Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-02-22 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS RE'1lISED AGENDA 1. . Continued Discussion Re: Town of Vail Mission/Vision/Goals. Arri~r~~~tt'A~Srnm8r' FI,g~?t$: R~q~#~St t~7t .ht.e; 3. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 4. Discussion Re: Eagle County Recreation Authority Final Draft of Letter of Intent, Ground Lease, and Joint Use Agreement. 5. Selection of Council Representative(s) to the West Vail Master Plan (Vail Commons) Task Force and Council Discussion of Issues to Include in the Request for Proposal (RFP). 6. Discussion Re: Alternatives Regarding Prohibition of Retail Sales of Handguns and/or Restrictions Regarding Carrying or Use of Weapons. 8. DRB Report. 90 Information Update. * Ford ParWFrontage Road Parking. 10. Council Reports. 11. Other. 120 Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START T9MES BELOW: • • • • • • • THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/1/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHANiBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/1/94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL~REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/8/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • • • • CAAGENDA.WS VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS RE1/IS'ED EXPANDED AGENDA 12:00 P.M. 1. Continued discussion re: Town of Vail MissionNision/Goals. Bob McLaurin Action Requested of Council: Review, discuss, and modify as appropriate the MissionlVision/Goals for TOV for the coming two years. Backpround Rationale: The third working draft of the MissioN Vision/Goals document is enclosed in your packet. 2: . ~:(lQ<:A: M. ArneriAtrl.lnes:;;su;mml~t~ ~t .<est;<tor;:; uarantee~ . . 9 Ker?t :.My0r . $ Backqtaund:>F3a#iorial~ Vail AsSociates, #nc (UAJ oftpals have asKQd;the ct~rnrnun,t~ #a +com~ wp w~t~ a~63U,~i0 ant~e and $70,0~0 ~n rnarket1 r7g co5ts x~ encc~urage Arnericar~ lir~es;: ta b~girt ;Surnm~r 5~~~~ #0 ~agl@ 0ttty R0gionat AitpOrt Vi4;~; plan calls tor th~ee I~eues af.cornrnifrn~~t' the gald teve;l, with;t~en grrru~is t~r ~ndiv~duals ComEng urith $2~t} ~~~h, the &'ilv~t t~v..... wJth 2:~ en~itres pro~itlmg $i0,c~0 ea~h, and the bronze;Ieve~, : SO erttifi0S COrrting with;$S,~Of# h 2:10 P.M. 3. Executive Session: Legal Matters. ~ 3:10 P.M. 4. Discussion re: Eagle County Recreation Authoriry (ECRA) final Tom Moorhead drafts of Letter of Intent, Ground Lease, and Joint Use Agreement. Action Requested of Council: Consider and approve, modify, or deny the final drafts of the Letter of Intent, Ground Lease, and Joint Use Agreement to be considered by ECRA on 2/23/94. Backqround Rationale: Give representatives of ECRA direction , and authority to approve draft provisions. 4:10 P.M. 5. Selection of Council representative(s) to the West Vail Master Plan Mike Mollica Plan (Vail Commons) Task Force and Council discussion of issues Andy Knudtsen to include in the Request for Proposal (RFP). Backqround Rationale: The Community Development Department is preparing to draft a RFP that would address design, land use, and traffic circulation issues for this site and the surrounding area. In general, TOV is looking at a mixed-use project which would also include affordable housing for the site. The task force members will review the draft Request for Proposal and will ultimately hire a consultant team which will assist TOV in developing the appropriate design guidelines, the list of allowable uses for this site, and addressing the transportation issues. Once this phase of work is completed, this information will be given to developers who bid on the implementation of the project. Staff would also like to hear Council's comments on issues they believe should be included in the RFP. In addition to Council representation on the task force, the staff i 1 , anticipates having a representative from the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Housing Authority, and representation from the community at large. 4:30 P.M. 6. Discussion re: alternatives regarding prohibition of retail sales of Tom Moorhead handguns and/or restrictions regarding carrying or use of weapons. Buck Allen Action Requested of Council: Consider alternatives concerning the above and discuss the present legislative action regarding licensing of handguns. Backqround Rationale: Council requested discussion concerning this issue. ARRie-Fe* . An}inn C]en o lerl nf Gn nn'1 Inrlin fo 4nr+h 1994 !99e L. .d a • . _ g 5:15 P.M. 8. DRB Report. Jim Curnutte 5:20 P.M. 9. Information Update. # Ford Park/Frontage Road Parking. 5:35 P.M. 10. Council Reports. 11. Other. 5:50 P.M. 12. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: • • • • 9 • • THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULaR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/1/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CF9AMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVEWING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3h/94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWM COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/8/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • O • • C:WGENDA.WSE 2 A VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1994 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA i. Continued Discussion Re: Town of Vail MissioNVision/Goals. 2. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 3. Discussion Re: Eagle County Recreation Authority Final Draft of Letter of Intent, Ground Lease, and Joint Use Agreement. 4. Selection of Council Representative(s) to the West Vail Master Plan (Vail Commons) Task Force and Council Discussion of Issues to Include in the Request for Proposal (RFP). 5. Discussion Re: Altematives Regarding Prohibition of Retail Sales of Handguns and/or Restrictions Regarding Carrying or Use of Weapons. 6. Discussion Re: Library Hours of Highest Usage and Holiday Hours. 7. DRB Report. 8. . Information Update. * Ford ParWFrontage Road Parking. 9. Council Reports. 10. Other. li. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETtNG START TIMES BELOW: • • • • • • • THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/1/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/1/94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/8/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • • • • CAAGENDA.WS VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1994 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 12:00 P.M. 1. Continued discussion re: Town of Vail Mission/VisionlGoals. Bob McLaurin Action Reauested of Council: Review, discuss, and modify as - appropriate the Mission/VisioNGoals for TOV for the coming two years. Backqround Rationale: The third working draft of the Mission/ Vision/Goals document is enclosed in your packet. 2:00 P.M. 2. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 3:00 P.M. 3. Discussion re: Eagle County Recreation Authority (ECRA) final Tom Moorhead drafts of Letter of Intent, Ground Lease, and Joint Use Agreement. Action Requested of Council: Consider and approve, modify, or deny the final drafts of the Letter of Intent, Ground Lease, and Joint Use Agreement to be considered by ECRA on 2/23/94. Backqround Rationale: Give representatives of ECRA direction and authority to approve draft provisions. 4:00 P.M. 4. Selection of Council representative(s) to the West Vail Master Plan Mike Mollica Plan (Vail Commons) Task Force and Council discussion of issues Andy Knudtsen to include in the Request for Proposal (RFP). Backqround Rationale: The Community Development Department is preparing to draft a RFP that would address design, land use, and traffic circulation issues for this site and the surrounding area. In general, TOV is looking at a mixed-use project which would also include affordable housing for the site. The task force members will review the draft Request for Proposal and will ultimately hire a consultant team which will assist TOV in developing the appropriate design guidelines, the list of allowable uses for this site, and addressing the transportation issues. Once this phase of work is completed, this information will be given to developers who bid on the implementation of the project. Staff would also like to hear Council's comments on issues they believe should be included in the RFP. In addition to Council representation on the task force, the staff anticipates having a representative from the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Housing Authority, and representation from the community at large. 4:20 P.M. 5. . Discussion re: alternatives regarding prohibition of retail sales of Tom Moorhead handguns and/or restrictions regarding carrying or use of weapons. Buck Allen ' Action Requested of Council: Consider alternatives concerning the above and discuss the present legislative action regarding licensing of handguns. 1 Backqround Rationale: Council requested discussion concerning this issue: 5:05 P.M. 6. Discussion re: Library hours of highest usage and holiday hours. Annie Fox Action Requested of Council: tndicate for the 1994 or 1995 budget if regular hours or holiday hours should be added. Backqround Rationale: Council requested discussion concerning this issue. 5:25 P.M. 7. DRB Report. Jim Curnutte 5:30 P.M. 8. Information Update. * Ford Park/Frontage Road Parking. 5:45 P.M. 9. Councif Reports. 10. Other. 6:00 P.M. 11. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: • • • • • • • , THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3h/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/1/94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/8194, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • • • • C:IAGENDA.WSE 2 ~ (3rd worktng draft) TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO STATEMENT OF GOALS & OBJECTIVES 1994 TRANSPORTATION Provide_for,the safe and eificient. movement of people and goods within the Town of V~II, the area served by the regionat transportation system, and the Denver/Glenwood corridor through a muiti=model system. A. Promote the greater use of public iransit throughout the Town of Vail and the regional transportation system. ai. Improve the operational efficiency of the Town of Vail transit system. a2. Provide efficient & convenient transit for residents and workers. (Eagle, Leadville) a3. Promote efficient and convenient transportation between the Eagle Airport and the Town of Vail. 0. Promote a mass transit system from Denver International Airport (DIA) to Glenwood Springs. B. Provide and maintain a safe and efficient street system. Minimize congestion at the Main Vail and West Vail intersections. , b1. Improve the operational efficiency and safety of the street network by constructing improvements at the West VaiF and Main Vail intersections. b2. Improve the operafional efficiency of the street network by constructing the Simba Run Underpass. b3. Review the effectiveness of the 93-94 Winter Traffic Management Plan. - C. ,Provide for the safe movement of pedestrians and bicyclists throughout the Town of Vail and the Upper Eagle Valley. c1. Complete the bike and walking trail system as identified in the open lands plan. Q. Implement the recommendations in-the Village Streetscape Plan, while improving current street infrastructure. c3. Explore the feasibility of expanding pedestrian areas. 1 TOV Stafement of Goals and Objectives/1994 _ D. Provide for the efficient delivery and distribution of goods into the Vai! Village and • Lionshead. d1. Work with VA, East Village Homeowners to prepare design for lots 3P& J. d2 Pursue ptan for the Intemational parcel. E. Provide value-priced parking for visitors, employees, and residents. e1. Identify Transportation System Management Techniques (TSM) to reduce parking demands (e.g. park and rides, price controls, car pooling, and transit system improvements). e2 Identify areas for additional public parking. e3. Review and improve skier drop off access. F. Cooperate with other governmental agencies to promote the viability of fhe Eagle Airport. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS PurSue a Valley wide approach. with other governmental agencies and the prtvate sector _ #o provide serv(ces to solve common problems, avoid(ng duplication and tmproving the value delivered for tax dollars expended. A. Identify existing shared services and explore additiona/ opportunities for fhe shared services. B. Esfablish a public private partnership for the continuation of a vailey wide markefing etfort. C. Work with other governmenfal enfities and the private sector to enhance the etficiency of the regiona/ transportation system. D. Complete the site p/anning, including a residential component, and secure the necessary approva/s for the Berry Creek 5th sife. E. Implement the Land Ownership Adjustment Plan. F. Explore the politica/ and economic /easibility of consolidaiion with other town and/or special districts. G. Explore opportunities for joint purchasing with other governmental agencies. H. Investigate the potential of a private land trust to preserve open lands.. i. Encourage and cooperate with other governmental agencies to preserve and protect open space outside the Town of Vaii. J. Participate in and support fhe Eagle River Corridor Sfudy. K. Maintain and enhance the aquatic habitat, riparian environment, and water quality of Gore Creek. Maintain minimum stream flow of for Gore Creek. 2 TOV Statemant o1 Goals and Objectivas/1994 , L. Investigate combined transportation services for school children within the RE50J School District. HOUSING Facilitate construction and retentfon .of local housing, which is affordable, compatible, and in order to maintain the economtc`and social viability of the Town of Vail. A. Work with Housing Authority to develop a 5 year Housing Plan. B. Imp/ement the _Vaii Commons (West Vait/Safeway) site p/an. bi. Prepare plan and project design. b2. Obtain necessary project approvais. C. Identify and acquire existing dwellingunifs to be converted to permanently deed resfricied housing units. . D. Ana/yze a/ready idenfified land to be acquired for construciion of new local housing units. E. Begin construction on TOV-owned parcels. . F. Explore a/ternative financing mechanisms for affordable housing. . G. Facilitate financing fa those who voluntarily deed restrict properties. H. Encourage through zoning improvements/changes/modifications our ability to stabilize the loca/ popu/afion. h1. Increase voter base. h2. Explore homestead exemption. G. Work to stop the conversion of local housing into tourist properties. PLANNING, GROWTH, & DEVELOPMENT ISSUES . Strive to maintain the unique alpine character of the Vail community. Matntain a balance between resort development and environmental and quality of life considerations. A. Maintain a land use pattern that provides a balance of land uses and recognizes the capabilities and limitations of natural and man made features. B. Allow sustainable growth and change which can be served within fhe capacities of exisiing and p/anned infrastructure. C. Protecf and enhance the quality of life in the community through the preservafion of open lands within the Town of Vail. c1. Implement the Open Lands Plan. 3 TOV Stazement of Goals and ObjectNesl1994 c2. Implement the Boundary Adjustment Plan. ' c3. Ensure that properties acquired with RETT funds are permanentiy restricted to open space. D. Identify lands necessary to meet future transportation needs. E. Identify parce/s necessary to meef future local housing needs. F. Implement the Cemetery P/an. f1. Determine the management structure for cemetery management & maintenance. f2. Construct Cemetery tmprovements. G. Review opportunities for further annexation to the Town of Vail. H. Conduct proactive,.long range p/anning activities. hi. Continue'to strategically plan with Vail Associates regarding future growth. h2. Update fhe Town of Vail Land Use Plan. h3. Proceed with the plan for and redevelopment of Lionshead. 1. Provide efficient development review and current planning activities. i1. Review Special Deyelopment District (SDD) regulations. 12. Complete the Vail Commons Master Plan and proceed with development. i3. Review and modify (if necessary) Design Review Board guidelines. J. Provide opporfunities for local, viable, convenient shopping within the Town of Vail. K. Create unique, commercial, innovative, and upscale opportunities for loca/ businesses. INFRASTRUCTURE Provide for malntenance of exlsting and future Town Infrastructure. A. Plan, prioritize and fund additional infiastructure necessary to maintain and enhance the quality of life in the community. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Work to promote a posittve, year round economtc envlronment. A. Maintain the short term bed base in the Vail Village and Lionshead. ai. Quantify the loss of short term rental units. a2. Review & modify (if necessary) land development regulations. B. With the retail community, develop strategies to enhance Vail's economy. bi. Work to inaintain a balance with condominiums and hotel units. b2. Encourage improvement of existing units. 4 TOV Statement of Goals and Objectivas/1994 C. Work with the VRD, the Vail VaNey Marketing Board, and others to conducf specia/ evenis -that will enhance the local economy. ENVIRONMENT Be a world leader in proyiding a safe, poliutton free environment. Strtve to malntain a high quality of life for Vall residents and guests. A. Imp/ement an Environmenfa/ Strategic Plan that addresses air and water quality and recycling. B. Work with the private sector to reduce second hand smoke in public p/aces. C. Promote recycling and reusing efforts. , c1. Work to create a regional market for recycled products. D. lncrease #he greening of the Gore Valley by planting trees, scrubs and flowers with a special emphasis on fhe I-70 corridor. d1. Identify areas to be landscaped. d2. Prepare landscape plans. E. Cooperate and support the Eagle Mine clean.up process. : ..ORGANBZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Matntain a htgti performing, highly efficient, customer drtven organtzatfon. A. Improve internal communications within the Town of Vail organization. a1. Prepare a Master Plan for TOV communica#ions (computers, voice& data) a2. Implement an Electronic Mail throughout the TOV organization. a3. Impiement a voice mail system on the town phone system. B. Improve external communications. b1. Enhance the image of the Town of Vail. b2, Concentrate on separate categories of communication including employees, guests, and residents. C. Integrate the principals of continuous improvement in the operations of the Town of Vail. c1. Train a11 personnel in TQM fundamental and Departmental improvement Process (DIP) training. . c2. Articulate the TOV's Organizationai Values and Principals. D. Become a cusfomer driven organization. Be sensitive io our customer's (both internal & external) needs and concerns. d1. Refine tracking system to monitor customer complaints. 5 TOV Statement of Goals and Objectivesl1994 •r E. Provide municipal services in as efficient and effective manner as possib/e. ' - e1. Implement cost accounting for major municipal services. e2. Implement performance based budgeting system. F. Analyze the result of the 1993 Survey and implement changes needed fo improve the service delivery. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Maintain the financial viabillty of the Town. A. Maintain stability of the town's revenue streams. B. Analyze the impacts of Amendment 1. C. Analyze the effecfiveness of performance based budgeting. D. Develop policies regarding fund balance levels, and debt management. E. Eva/uate opportunities for privatization of municipai services. F. Explore control of various municipal utilities. HUMAN. SERVICES Provide services and support activities that enhance quality of life In the Town of Vail. A. Provide opportunities for life long learning, and research through the Vail Public Library. a1. Develop and maintain state of the art library services to residents and guests. B. Investigate the feasibility of a private public partnership to construct a performing arts center. D. Work with the VRD to ensure continued recreational services for the Town's residents. E. Explore strategies for enhancing day care alternaiives with fhe Town. F. Cooperate with other educational agencies fo support a variety of educational opportunities. (e.g. Colorado Mtn. College, Vail Mountain School, Pubiic school system, Ski Club Vail) 6 TOV Statement ot Goals and Objectivesl1994 C VISION - VAlL, COLORADO OPTION #1: TO BE TH-E PREMIER , NOUNTAIN COMMUNITY AND INTERNATIONAL RESORT. O PTI O N #2 : TO BE THE PREMIER INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY AND RESORT. ' ' MISSION - VAIL, COLORADO OPTION #1: IN KEEPING WITH VAIL'S VISION, THROUGH : ;RESPC)NS,IBLE LEADERSHIP, TO PRQVIDE THE FOLLOWING: o- Effective and efficient municipai services. o Envirpnmentally`sensitive high quality of life. o Positive, sustained economic climate. oP-rioN #z: THROUGH RESPONSIBLE STEWARDSHIP TO'PROVADE THE FOLLOWING: o Effective and efficient- municipal services. o E0vironmental1y'9ens1t1ve high quality of life. o - Pos'rtive, susfained'economic climate. lead v. 1 guide, escort, direct, conduct, accompany, pilot, usher. 2 supervise, manage, direct, govern, boss, com- . mand, induce, iafluence. 3 precede, head, open, start, eacel, outstrip, sur- pass. --n. 1 leadership, Predomi- nance, priority, primacy, ini6ative, van8uard, direction, supremacy. 2 ~advantage, head start, lumP, edge, precedence, margin. 3 clue, hiat, tip, paiaier, suggestion, indication, cue, trace. . leader n, chief, commander, director, head, superior, chieftain, captain, foreman;,boss, conductoz, guide, su- pervisor, torchbearer,. bellwether, ' honcho (Slmig), Fuhrer. . aat. follower, disciple, myimidon, subordiaate, acolyte, adherent, leadeiship n. hegemony, charisma, dominance, Pneduminanr,e, forco- P~BCY, superiority, su- premacy, domination, generaLship, magnetism, influence, strength, ateward n. manager, oustodian, agent, administntor, caretaker, director, representative, proxy, factor, com- mission merchant, St@Ward (stUoVard, styU-of-), n. 1. a person who man- ages another's property or financial affairs; one who ad= ministers anvrthing as the agent of another or others. 2. a person w•ho has charge of the household of another, buying or obcaining food, directing the servants, etc. 3. an emplovee who has charge of the table, wine, servants, ~ etc., in a club, restaurant, or the like. 4. a person who attends to_ the domestic concerns of persons on board a vessel, as in overseeing maids and waiters. 5. an em- ployee on a ship, train, or bus wno waits on and is : e- . sponsible for the comfort of passengers, takes orders for - or distributes food, etc. 6. a flight attendant. 7. a per- son appointed by an organization orgr oup to supervise the affairs of that group at certain functions. S. U.S. Navy. a pettv officer in charge of officer's quarters and mess. -o.i. 9. to act as steward of; manage. -u.i. 10. to act or serve as steward. [bef. 900; ME; OE stiweard, stigweard, equiv. to stig- (sense uncert.• prob. "house, hall"; see srY') + weard WARD2] -stewiard•ship/, n. P 02I16/1994 15:27 303-949-1668 OUERLAND & D4'RESS PAGE 01 I' TD : ;.Bob. ~.'Mci;aurin: ~ DATE: 1f February 7994 , FROM; Jan Strauch RE: Next Week's Work Session As you know, I will not be at the 22 FQb meeting, and Z wanted to provide eome input on two of the agenda items: VAIL CdlmUNS ~ 1. TOTAL ECONQMIC REDEVELdpMENT PRDJECT: The plan should not only focus on the Vail Commons I,and but the entire commercial area between the Brandess Buildiny to wendy's. Let's not just build another "strip mall" but involve the other developers there to create a"unique ngw',' architectu~T' ally integrated Cammercialjresidential community with improvec1 tra f f ia f low,,parking, attracti.ve lighting, and retall exciteme,nt - 2. BELOCATE THE HRANDESS HUILDING: While maybe difficult and at first seeminqYy impossible, we should explore the passibility Qf tearing down the Brandess Buflding, offering improved space for those tenants in the new camplex, and leavinq that eastern lot as park/open sgace 3and. 3. Nb FIRE STATIpN: WhiZe,:there is strong interest/r?eed in putting a fire statian on vaiZ CQmmons, let's find a more aApropriate A1est Vai1 lpGation, like by tihe gas atationg. FirB station9 make poor-neighbars, and there are many other - more important things to.add.:to this relatf.vely small pieae of land, - 4. PRdVIDE BROAD MIX OF AFFORDABLB HQUSING: Since we have so few other gaoc3 lacations, et s maximize the density ...BUT,.. at the same time maintaining,goafl quality and attracting a gvod economic/demographic.mix of potential buyers/renters. A large number of cheap cook`ie cutter units is a bad idea. Let's offer a variety af sizes and prices far families, singles, yaunq married:;and,;winter rentals, etc. 4 5. IMPROVED RETAIL OPPORTUNITY:;;A larger/imprQVed Safeway will ba a major plus. But attracti:ng another major "anchar stare" oould tip the balaace of local retail activity back'up valley away from Avonf provic33ng the town and our residents with increased economic.atability'anfl convenience. ~ 1 ; ' ~ . j . ~ . Q 02/16/1994 15:27 303-949-1668 OVERLAND & IXPRESS PAGE 02 fag@ Tw8 fi. OTHER AGTIVITIES: bAY CARg is a growing popular lacal need. Let's relocate, expand, and improve the Mt Bell facility down ta Vail . Commpna. ° PARAING shauld best be undergraund or in an attractive structure to not only meet the cvmmon needs of all the shdppers arid residents but as a potential PARfC N' RIDE spat for dovan valley based Vail employees. ° SZSZLS: Can we add something there to create more life • and interest; tttaybe an ice rink, theatre, bowling alley, pool... - GOALS i OHJ$CTIVSS ~ Last niqht's session was gQOd work;; but in retraspect, I think we focused too much on being economic Czars. At most, TOV shauld pravide some direction and opportunity, but shonld not get tao mueh involved with specific business types. Let the market resdlve that. dn the balance of the items: ENVIRONMENTo D. Z'd like to see a spec3fic five year plan witri speci.fie gaa.ls including a commitment to completely "reforest" the Vail floor, planting 10,000 trees a year thraugh oombined effcrts of the town, other group$, and some type of property owner.incentive.FINANCIAL PERFQRMANCE: Let's fpllow Merv's comments and start Iooking/planning much longer term:_and explore what "no debt" will mean to Vail's future..- ~ ; I ; l. ~ ~ . . , . ~ ; i a- , . ~Vha ~ Vail Associates, Inc. February 17, 1994 Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver Creeko Resorts Dear Vail Valley business leader, As you may have read in this past Friday's Vail Daily, we have a unique and immediate opportunity to eBect summer air service via American Airlines into Eagle beginning as soon as June 16, 1994. American has agreed to a 52-day summer flight season wluch would set the pace for years of continued air capacity into Eagle year-around. A group of concerned business leaders have gathered and are volunteering their time to solicit financial commitment, in both hard and soft dollars, so that we have a unified ownership in the benefits of the air service. A number of other communities, including Jackson Hole and several Caribbean Islands have committed similarly to such ait programs. ' We must have letters of commitment for $700,000 by Wednesday, February 23 to assure flight service. Rough estimates of pledges so far, following a ineeting held at the Westin Hotel yesterday, indicate that we have over $200,000 verbally committed from various entities within the community. Financial commitments work, simply; as, follows: A small, medium or large business is asked to commit at a$5000, $10,000, or $20,000 level respectively. Only 10% of that pledge needs to be paid up-front prior to the initiation of air service: If revenues derived exceed expenses, no payment will be due. If - revenues fall short of eapenses, the community pays American Airlines the shortfall. American Airlines has agreed to accept the risk of any shortfall beyond $630,000. We are optimistic that with proper, aggressive and col(ective marketing by the community, that the potential down-side would be moderate. A pledge form is attached and we wouid ask that you take serious note of the request and fax it back to us at your very earliest convenience. We truly want to position the Eagle summer airlines program as a community-based and collective effort. In that way we can ensure its success. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to phone any of us: Phone: Fal:: Frank Johnson Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau 476-1000 476-6008 Brian Nalan Beaver Creek Merchants Assoc. 949-5001 KT Gazunis Manor Vail 476-5651 476-4982 Laura Southwick The Sonnenalp 476-5656 476-1639 Al Stratta The Lodge at Vail 476-5011 476-7425 Ross Bowker East/West Hospitality 845-9200 949-5526 Bill Anderson The Charter at Beaver Creek 949-6660 949-6709 Steve Dewire The Hyatt at Beaver Creek 845-2800 • 944-4164 Jonathan Staufer Vail Village Inn .476-5622 476-4661 Bill Tomcich Vail Assoc'iates Air Marketing Coordinator 845-5730 845-5729 Spencer Butts VaiUBeaver Creek Central Reservations 845-5736 $45-5729 Bob Kunkel Vail Associates Marketing 845-5852 845-5282 Chris French Vail Associates Hospitality Corporation 845-5857 845-5282 Plea turn pSedgcr^form to Vail Associates Public Relations at fax number 845-5728 or PO Box 7. thanks for ur interest and commitment. . i eriit yers Senior Vice President Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA -(303) 476-5601 . ~Vaila 0 Vail Associates, Inc. Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver CreekO Resorts SUMMER 1994 DALLAS/FT WORTH - VaIUEAGLE JET SERVICE PROPOSAL Schedule: Dpt DFW 6:30P - Arr EGE 7:52P Dpt EGE 8:45A - Arr DF1N 11:58A Connections: 89 Cities include several international destinations (See Reverse) Date Range: June 16, 1994 through Aiagust 6, 1994 Westbound June 17, 1994 through August 7, 1994 Eastbound Frequency: Daily Number of Ops: 52 Equipment Type: Boeing 757-200, 188 Seats (22 ist Class, 166 Coach) Proposal: Minimum Revenue Guarantee Required: Costs =$28,500 per Fi/T flight, $1,482,000 total If revenues derived exceed expenses, no payment will be due. If revenues fall short of expenses, the community pays AA the shortfall. AA has agreed to accept the risk of any shortfall beyond $630,000. Detail of Costs: $28,500 per RfT flight includes all fully allocated fixed costs: " Aircraft Ownership " Cabin Crew * Fuel " Landing Fees " Ground Handling " Terminal Access " Maintenance * Profit Margin " Cockpit Crew " Other Allocated Fixed Costs American has also agreed to absorb all associated variable costs: (Average $50 per RIT Passenger) * CRS Booking Charges " Travel Agency Commissions " Security Screening " Overrides Catering Credit Card Fees Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA -(303) 476-5601 VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. LIST OF 89 CONNECTING CITIES TO PROPOSED DALLAS-EAGLE SUMMER FLIGHT Abilene, TX Houston/lntl, TX Omaha, NE Amarillo, TX Huntsville, AL Oklahoma City, OK Atlanta, GA indianapolis, IN Orlando, FL Austin, TX Jackson, MS ParislOrfy, FR Baltimore, MD Jacksonville, FL Philadelphia, PA Baton Rouge, LA Kansas City, MO Phoenix, AZ Birmingham, AL Killeen, 7X Pittsburgh, PA Boston, MA Lafayette, LA RaleighlDurham, NC BeaumontlPt Arthur, TX Lake Charles, LA Richmond, VA Cancun, MX Laredo, TX St Louis, MO Charlotte, NC Lawton, OK San Anjelo, TX ChicagolOhare, IL Little Rock, AR San Antonio, TX Cincinnati, OH London/Gatwick, UK San Juan, PR Cleveland, OH Longview, TX Savannah, GA College Sta, TX Louisville, KY Shreveport, LA Columbus, OH Lubbock, TX Springfield, MO Corpus Christie, TX McAllen, TX Tampa, FL Des Moines, IA Memphis, TN Texarkana, AR Detroit, MI Mexico City, MX Tokyo/Narita, JAPAN EI Paso, TX Miami, FL Toronto, ONT Fayetteville, AR Midland/Odessa, TX Tulsa, OK Ft Lauderdale, FL Minneapolis, MN Tuscon, AZ Fort Smith, AR Mobile, AL Tyler, TX Frankfurt, GD Monroe, LA Waco, TX Greensboro, NC Monterey, MX Washington D.C./Dulles Guadalajara, MX Nashville, TN Washington D.C.INatl Guatemala City, GT Newark, NJ West Palm Beach, FL Harlingen, TX New Orleans, LA Wichita, KS Hartford, CT New York/LGA, NY Wichita Falls, TX Houston/Hobby, TX Norfolk, VA VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. AMERICAN AIRLINES MRG BREAK-EVEN MATRIX PREPARED BY BILL TOMCICH SUMMER 1994 DFW-EGE JET SERVICE PROPOSAL NET PROFIT (LOSS) MATRIX LOAD FACTOR: BRE1iK r~n.v: 3t1~J6 ` , 3t ` 40% $0.11 t175.46R/T ($1,014,218) ($858,291) Z702,364) ($546,437) ($390,510) ($234,582) . $78,655) 95.10/o, $0.12 5191•40RlT ($971,693) ($801 ) ($631,488) ($461,386) ($291,283) A ,181) $48,922 87.20 $0.13 a207.35RlT ($929,167) /44,890) ($560,612) ($376,334) ($192, ($7,779) $179,498 80.50/ $0.14 ,5223.3oRlT ($886,642) ($688,189) ($489,736) ($291,283) Z2,830) $105,622 $304,075 74.70/ $0.15 5138.23R/T ($844,1 ) ($631,488) ($418,860) {$206, j 0' $6,396 $219,024 $431,652 69.70/o $0.16 ,f255.2oRJT ($8 590) ($574,787) ($347,984) ( . ,181) $105,622 $332,426 $559,229 65.40/ $0.17 s271.15RlT 59,065) ($518,086) ($277,108) ($36,130) $204,849 $445,827 $686,806 61.50/ a, $0.18 $287.10 R/T ($716,539) ($461,386) ($206;V2) $48,922 $304,075 $559,229 $814,382 58.10/o $0.19 $=oSRIT ($674,014) ($404,685) J5,356) $133,973 $403,302 $672,630 $941,959 55.10 i- $0.20 5319.oD j$631,488) ($347,984) , ($64,480) $219,024 $502,528 $786,032 $1,069,536 52.34 Break-Even Point Point beyond which American Airlires is willing to absorb all risk ($630,000 Loss) SUPPLY . 52 FLIGHTS X 188 SEATS PER FLIGHT 9776 TOTAL SEATS AVAILABLE X 69.7% ESTIMATED BREAK-EVEN LOAD FACTOR 6814 # SEATS NEEDED TO SELL TO BREAK-EVEN - PROJECTED DEMAND 740 SEATS SOLD THROUGH VBCR FROM FEEDER CITIES LAST SUAAMER (JUNE 16,1993 - AUGUST 7, 1993) X 50 VBCR SALES 1NERE A 2% SAMPLING OF TOTAL SALES (R.R.C. ASSOC RESEARCH) 37000 TOTAL OUT-OF-STATE ViSITORS WHO COULD POTENTIALLY USE THESE FLIGHTS X 56% PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-STATE VISITORS WHO FLEW TO COLORADO LAST YEAR 20720 TOTAL PROJECTED SIZE OF INBOUND F.I.T. MARKEf FOR SUMMER FLIGHTS coNcLUSIoNs 33% PENEfRATION REQUIRED TO BREAK-EVEN. (WINTER PENETRATION = 21 MEETINGICONVENTION SALES WILL HELP DRAMATICALLY. LOCAL TRAFFIC FLYING OUTBOUND MUST ALSO BE CONSIDERED. American Airlines (AA) and Vail/Beaver Creek Resort (V/BCR) Summer Airline Marketing Plan SfTUATION ANALYSIS 1. Winter direct flights from DFW-EGE have become very successful after four years of operations. 2. Denver International Airport will be approximately 30 minutes farther away from the Vail Valley than Stapleton. 3. Vail will be the firat resort community in Colorado to have direct summer jet service on a major airline. 4. American Airlines has agreed to run daily flights from DFW-EGE subject to a minimum revenue guarantee from the community. This community is also responsible for marketing this program. TARGEf MARKEfS 1. Repeat summer visitors who in the past have flown into Denver. 2. Repeat visitors who in the past have driven to Vail, but now find it more convenient to fly. 3. New summer visitors who have vacationed in Summit County or Estes Park because of the closer proximity to a major airport. 4. New summer visitors who come to this valley because of its convenient access. 5. Local Vail Valley residente flying out on business or leisure. 6. 2nd Homeowners 7. Targeted metro markets listed in priority: A. DallaslFt Worth, TX D. Tampa, FL B. New York, NY E. Atlanta, GA C. Houston, TX F. Nashville, TN GOAL: Achieve a break-even the first summer season of direct air service. STRATEGY ONE: Position this flight from DFW-EGE as THE LINK to the Vail Valley from all points south and east. Showcase this service in all V16CR and Vail Valley 1994 summer marketing programs. Tactics: VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1. Intergrate Service into all resort collateral: Vail & BC Summer Brochures, mountain maps, etc. 2. Inclusion on TV-8 EGE Airport Editorial Piece & Commercial 3. Dallas Summer Radio Promo 4. Targeted Newspaper Advertising 5. Direct Mail 6. Produce 8 Distribute 3" X B" Promotional Flyer 7. Produce Fly-Vail Summer Promotional Collateral (Hats, Buttons, Calandars, etc.) 8. Integrate into all Sales Shows/Presentations 9. Include mentions on VBCR phone messagelFAX cover sheets 10. Integrate into all P.R. press kits, releases, media fams, etc. 11. Host BC Homeowners luncheon in target markets. VAIL VALLEY MARKETING BOARD 1. Integrate Service Announcement into all available advertising media. 2. Develop advertising campaign focused on new direct flights. 3. Host Press Trips 4. include in fullfillment piece. LODGING COMMUNITY 1. Include mentions of summer flights in all direct mail & confirmations. 2. integrate into all existing marketing and sales programs. STRATEGY TWO: Integrate service info into all available American Airlines programs. Tactics: t. Press Releases to all res & sales offices, trade publications. 2. Sabre Sign-In Message/Fun Facts on Vail 3. Res Agent Booking Contest for Vail 4. Frequent Flier Announcement/Bonus Miles 5. Mileage Summary Insert/Ticket Stuffers (V.A. Produces) 6. Citibank AAdvantage VISA Promotion 7. System TimetablelCover Photo? 8. American Way Magazine Featurn Article 9. LED Display in airport monitors 10. Inclusion on all Route Maps 11. Mentions in employee newsletter 12. Summer Airport Display at DFW SUMMER FLIGHT FINANCIAL PROPOSAL TOTAL COST OF PROGRAM... $1,500,000 TOTAL RISK TO COMMUNITY... $630,000 (SOFT DOLLARS) MARKETING DOLLARS REQUIRED... 70 000 (HARD DOLLARS) TOTAL COMMITTMENT NEEDED... $700,000 T'H~iE~'LEVELS dFI:CC~MMITTM~NT 10% HARD 90% SOFT SUBTOTAL GOLD 10 @ $20,000 $2,000 $18,000 $200,000 SILi/ER 25 @ $10,000 $1,000 $9,000 $250,000 BRONZE 50 @ $5,000 $500 $4,500 250 000 $700,000 , '.1 t ' VA puts tag price on air proposal Summer flights hinge on $630,000 in guarantees By David O. Williams • oairy sten writer Vail Associates Inc. officials on Fli9ht$ Thursday asked the community to From Page 1 sengers on each flight, a 70-percent concem that the new Denver Intema- come up with a$630,000 guarantee load factor translates into '7,000 tional Airport, which gces on line in and $70,000 in marketing costs to Aug.7,to be occupied in order for the brave souls that are willing to pay 250 March, is too faz from Vail, adding at entice American Airlines to begin summer flights to break even. bucks to fly in here;'.Myers said. least 30 minutes of drive time. summer service to Eagle County To that end, VA senior vice presi- That $250 figure was an estimated "How isolated dces the Vail Val- Regional Airport. dent Kent Myers said the ski compa- fare for a mund-trip ticket to Dallas, ley and the communities around it American officials have agreed to ny is willing to come up with $40,000 where connecting flights to 89 cities, really become?" Myers asked, adding run 52 nonstop Boeing 757 ftights or $q.ppp in "hard" dollars and primarily in the East and Southeast, that VA needs to have a definitive from Dallas-Fort Worth to Eagle this $36,000 in "soft" dollazs. would be available. answer for American by March 1. summer at:a cost of $1.48 million, but p5ked to estimate how much of a Myers said the plan needs to be "We've been talking about this for they want VA and the community to deficit the summer flights might mean "grass-roots driven" because iYs in a couple of years, but the time just accept up to $630,000 in risk. for the community in the first year, response to community pressure to hasn't been right," said Ronald • VA officials held an exploratory Myers said: "I think realistically we expand further the summer tourism "Ridge" Rairigh, regiona] general meeting Thursday at the Westin could look at a$200,000 shortfall." industry. Dallas is Vail's number-one manager for American. "Now I think Resort Vail to gauge the level of com- VA air marketing coordinator Bill summer mazket and services con- is the time. munity suppon for summer flights Tomcich set a more optimistic goal. necting flights to Mexico Ciry, anoth- and to outline a plan for municipali- ~~Our goal is to break even in the er rapidly growing summer market . "I think with t6e kind of product ties and merchant, tourism and pro- first summer," Tomcich said. "That's for Vail. we provide and the kind of resources fessional associa~ions to gei finan- no easy thing to achieve." . The timing of the push for sum- you can offer, it can be a win-win sit- cially involved. Based on 52 flights wifh 188 pas- mer flights is based mainly on the uation." VA's pian cal)s for three levels of • . - • ' commitment: the gold level, with 10 groups or individuals coming up with $20A00 each; the silver level, with 25 entities providing $10,000 each; and the bronze level, with 50 entities coming up with $5,000 each. • However, 10 percent of that com- mitment would be in "hard" dollars, actually requiring a check, with the other 90 percent in "soft" dollars, • meaning they would be paid only in the event that the flights fail to attract enough passengers. VA's estimates ca11 for 70 percent of the seats on the flights, which would run daily between June 16 and , Pfease see Flights Page 62 / MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Counci( FR: Tom Moorhead - DA: . February 16, 1994 RE: Eagle County Recreation Authority Attached you will find the Letter of Intent regarding the Berry Creek site dated January 5, 1994; the Ground Lease dated January 6, 1994; and the Joint Use Agreement dated January 6, 1994. These will be considered for execution at the Eagle County Recreation Authority meeting on February 23, 1994, at 7:00 P.M. Thank you. ~ . ' C:18RYCRK.MEM - - - - 1. ~ 1 \ ~yL ~l f,;TOWN OF VAIL J.:; 75 South Frontage Road _ Office of Town Anorney Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21071 FAX 303-479-2157 January 21, 1994 ~ Representatives of The Board of Directors Eagle County Recreation Authority c% Mr. Lynn K. Robertson, Administrator Benchmark Plaza, Suite 201 - 48 E. Beaver Creek Blvd. Avon, Colorado 81620 . RE: Berry Creek Lease Agreement and Use of Town of Vail Council Chambers Gentlemen: Enclosed are copies of the Letter of 7`ransm.ittal, I.etter of Intent, Ground Lease, a.^.d Joint Use Agreement between the Recreation Authority and the Schaol District. After each of the members has had an opportunity to review the document, this matter should be scheduled for special heari.ng or individual members should communicate their accepta.nce, rejection, or concern with the various Agreement terms and provisions directly to me. I am certain that all members of the Recreation Authority are aware that on January 19, 1994, the Eagle County Plan.ning Commission tabled the Berry Creek 5th sketch pla.m. It has been rescheduled for consideration on February 2, 1994. Bob McLaurin, Vail Town Manager, has given permission for the Recreation Authority to use ` the Town of Vail Council Chambers providing there is no conflict with a scheduled meeting or event in the facility. I know the Recreation Authority has been holdi.ng its meetings on Thursdays, and Thursdays are the regularly scheduled Municipal Court heari.ngs in the Council Chambers. Use of the facility should be coordinated through the secretary of the Town Manager and Town 9ttorney, dd Deto at 479-2106. . If anyone has any questions or comments concerning any of these items or issues, please feel ' free to contact me. Very truly y s, . . ' ~'`~'•'-~'"~"~~~.t'-'. ,%IiM~i , . d;53Town-Attorney{...i i RTM/dd Enclosures GRarrr, BE~va~ - DANffi. F. BERNARD P0.Sf OFFICE BOX 978 W.~ H. G~ I.yONS & GAI?DIS 515 ~ , RICHARD N. LYONS, II IANGMONT, CO 80502-0g78 JEFFREY J. KAHN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 303-7769900 . H. WII.LiAM SDMS, JR. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS MEfRO 571-5506 JOHN W. GADDIS SUZAN D. FR1TCfMLL FAX 772l105 SfEVEN L. SNYDER BxAnLEr A. HAU January 14, 1994 R. Thomas Moorhead, Esq. , Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road RECEIO/Ea ,1gN 18 1994 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Berry Creek Site Dear Tom: This will follow up on our recent telephone conversation concerning tying up the "loose ends" with respect to the above-referenced matter. I have enclosed duplicate originals of the following instruments: 1. Cetter of Intent Regarding Berry Creek Site dated January 5, 1994. 2. Ground Lease dated January 6, 1994. 3. Joint Use Agreement dated January 6, 1994. If you would be kind enough to have Howard Gardner and the Authority's Secretary execute both sets of these instruments and then forward them on to: Dr. Mel Preusser Eagle County School District RE-50J P.O. Box 740 Eagle, Colorado 81631 ' Mel can obtain the necessary signatures and return one original set of documents to you and retain one original set of documents at the District's Offices. We agreed that, under paragraph 5 of the Letter of Intent, the District's Board of Education has the authority to "not do the deal" if, in the Board's discretion, fails to approve a completed feasibility study. In liglit of that, we agreed that the Ground Lease should not be recorded until the following occurred: 1. The District's Board of Education formally approved the feasibility study; 2.. We were able to insert a specific legal description of the approximately 11.5 acres of real property which are the subject of the Lease as Exhibit 6 to the Ground Lease; and, 3. We were able to substitute a more specific Conceptual Site Plan as Exhibit C to the Ground Lease. ~ GRANT, BERNARD - LYONS & GADDIS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS R. Thomas Morehead, Esq. January 14, 1994 Page 2 Also, once the feasibility study is concluded, then the parties should be able to commence and conclude negotiations concerning the specific terms of Exhibit A to the Joint Use Agreement. Exhibit A will be a more specific description of the specific joint use facilities at the Berry Creek Site and the dates on which such joint use facilities will become available. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, GRANT, BERNARD, LYONS & GADDIS, a Profe ' na Corporation By anie F. Bernar DFB:sd:jlm Enclosures cc: Board of Education - Dr. Mel Preusser (with enclosures) r- . f . EAGLE COUNTY SCHUOL DISTRICT RlE SOJ P.O. BOX 740 ~ EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 ~(303) 328-6321 January 5, 1994 Mr. Howard Gardner, Chairman Eagle County Recreation Authority ' 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Letter of Intent Regarding Berry Creek School Site Dear Howard: This is to advise you that this Letter of Intent was formally approved by the Board of Education of Eagle County School District RE-50J (District) at its regular monthly meeting on September 8, 1993. As you know, the terms of this Letter were previously informally approved by the Eagle County Recreation Authority (Authority) at its meeting on August 12, 1993 (and ratified by the Town Council of the Town of Vail at its meeting on August 24, 1993). Subsequent to these dates, the parties have reached other agreements which have been incorporated into this letter. The Authority and the District have agreed as follows: 1. RECITALS. The Authority is.the fee simple owner of a 105-acre parcel of real property located in Eagle County, Colorado. Because of growth in the District's student enrollment, the District is seeking to find a site on which to construct a new elementary or middle school. The parties have reached concep- tual agreement that construction of a new school on approximately 11.5 acres of the westerly portion of the Authority's parcel would be to the mutual advantage of both parties in that the Authority would be able to jointly use portions of both the site and the school building without incurring out-of-pocket construc- tion expenses and that, in consideration therefor, the District would be able to 1 ease the si te wi thout payment to the Authori ty except for the Di stri ct i ncurri ng development expenses estimated to be approximately $755,170 for improvements which are unique to the site, except for the District incurring additional expenses estimated to be $1,200,000 to build a full-size gymnasium and a separate public locker room with rest room facility access at this site, and except for a nominal annual lease payment. Such development costs are set fo.rth on the attached EXHIBIT A. Some portion of such expenses would be incurred by the District at other school sites, however, the Authority will not incur these expenses for its own purposes if the District builds at this site. 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. The legal description of the Authority's 105-acre parcel is set forth on the attached EXHIBIT B. The approximate location of the 11.5- acre parcel which is the subject of this Agreement (referred to in this Agreement as the Berry Creek Site) is as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan which is attached as EXHIBIT C. 3. ACREAGE, USE AND OWNERSHIP OF SITE. The parties anticipate and agree that the 11.5 acres within the Berry Creek Site will be allocated into three Parcels, A, B and C, as follows: Mr. Howard Gardner January 5, 1994 Page 2 Approx. No. of Parcel Acres Anticipated Use' Ownership A 5.0 School building Leased by Authority to District Appurtenant structures pursuant to a ground lease. The Parking lots lease shall terminate at such time as the District ceases to use Parcel A as a public school.Z B 5.0 Playing fields Leased by Authority to District Athletic fields pursuant to a ground lease. The Parking lots lease shall terminate at such time as the District ceases to use the adjacent Parcel A as a public school.3 C 1.5 Roads Authority with the Authority granting the District non- exclusive easements for ingress and egress to Parcels A and B.4 'The District understands and agrees that its use of the Berry Creek Site will require the installation of appropriate fencing (at the District's expense) to separate the Site from adjacent properties, including the railroad and pasture land. 2The consideration for such lease will be part of the District's expenditure of approximately $1,955,170 for improvements to the Berry Creek Site which are unique to the Site, and for construction of a full-size gymnasium and a separate public locker room with rest room facility access, all of which will be a direct benefit to the Authority. The District agrees that it will maintain the gymnasium, the locker room and the playing and athletic fields on Parcels A and B during the term of the ground lease. 36ecause the District will be expending significant amounts to develop, operate and maintain Parcel B to the mutual benefit of the Authority, the District and the citizens of the area, the lease payment to the Authority shall be $1.00 per year. The parties agree to engage-in good faith negotiations concerning specific provisions of such ground lease. 4The parties acknowledge that Parcel C will be used for private roads providing ingress and egress to the school building, etc. The Authority will retain owner- ship of these roads which will be constructed at District expense. Initially, these roads will be maintained at the District's expense. However, as the remaining portions of the Authority's acreage are developed by the Authority or others, the responsibility and expense for maintaining the roads shall be reallocated between the District and the Authority (or other users or lessees) based upon their respective uses. ~ i ( Mr. Howard Gardner January 5, 1994 Page 3 4. IRRIGATION WATER. The Authority agrees to furn"ish necessary treated or untreated water to the District for those portions of Parcel B which require i rri gati on at no cost to the Authori ty and as 1 ong as the Authori ty does not need such water for its own purposes. The District acknowledges that it may in the future be required to buy treated water or rent or buy water rights to untreated water for such purposes. 5. FEASIBILITY STUDY/PERIODIC REPORTS. The District's Board has formally approved initiation of a comprehensive and detailed study to determine the feasibility of construction of a new school on the Berry Creek Site. The District will make periodic reports to the Authority's Board of Directors on the progress and status of such feasibility study at critical stages of such study. The purpose of such reports shall be to update the Authority's directors on the District's plans, to hear the concerns of the Authority's directors, if any, and to ensure that the District's plans are compatible with the purposes of this Agreement. In this regard, it is the intention of the District to develop specific conceptual plans concerning the type and size of the school to be constructed on the Berry Creek Site prior to any bond election. The parties acknowledge that the District's Board of Education may, in its discretion, take formal action not to approve the completed feasibility study for any reason which the Board deems appropriate including, but not limited to, the cost of construction of a new school at the Berry Creek Site. 6. LEGAL EXPENSES. The parties agree that the cost of preparing any legal instruments required to implement this Letter of Intent will be borne by the District; provided, however, that any costs incurred by the Authority in having such instruments reviewed by the Authority's attorney shall be borne by the Authority. 7. AUTHORITY'S APPROVAL. It is the Board of Education's understanding that the Authority has previously approved the contents of this Letter of Intent. Accordingly, would you please indicate that approval by signing the enclosed duplicate original of this Letter and returning it to me at your earliest convenience as the District is on a very fast track to accomplish all that is required by this Letter of Intent prior to the deadlines set forth above. EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50J By Dan Corcoran, Presi ent, Boar o ucation APPROVED AND AGREED TO on January , 1994. \ EAGLE COUNTY RECREATION AUfHORITY By Howar Gar, ner, C airman 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 949-4020 K:~~r*_,.TM, (303) 476-7325 (Fax) ~BERRY CREEK FIFTH FILING DEVELOPMENT COSTS BENEFICIAL,TO RECREATION AUTHORITY ELECTRIC' Loop existing 3 phase power from $ 54,000 north side of railroad to south side of I-70 (1500 LF) includes transformer, conduit and vaults. , PHONE' Extend line from I-70 to site - 12,500 includes conduit. GAS Extend main line to east end of 10k 2,500 acre parcel. WATERZ Looped system with 1400 LF of 8" DIP, 62,000 gate valves and fire hydrants. SEWER2 350 LF 8" PVC with manholes. 15.500 a 146,500 ENG/SURVEY Soils tests, design and layout for S 49,000 A/D lanes, access road and parking. A/D LANES Includes structural backfill, paving, 107,420 guard rails culverts, etc. ACCESS ROAD Includes structural backfill, paving, 159,950 curbs, culverts, etc. PARKING Parking lot for approximately 60 142,300 cars. PLAY FIELDS Two at $75,000 (per Peter Jamar). 150.000 E 608~.670 GYM/LOCKER Full size gymnasium and separate 1.200.000 ROOM public locker room ($370,000). TOTAL a1.955,170 For 10.0 acre parcel, cost to School District per acre =$195,517 For 10.0 acre parcel, without any utility considerations, cost to School District per acre =$180,867 For 10.0 acre parcel, without any utility considerations, or gym and a locker room, cost to School District per acre 60,867 'The conduits for electric and phone lines installed by the District at the District's expense shall be of sufficient size to enable those who subsequently develop the remaining 93.5 acres of the Authority's real property as described on EXHIBIT B to pull their respective lines through such conduits at their own expense. ZThe water and sewer lines installed by the District at District expense shall be of sufficient size and capacity to accommodate subsequent development of the remaining 93.5 acres of the Authority's real property as described on EXH I B IT B. ~;~~~.~EXHIBIT ]F orsIsa ~F 09029brY«it.li ' ha,+j"-.s S~~ ~y. ~fl;.-G^- . . ~ EXHIBIT 6 is to be the specific legal description of the approximately 11.5 acres of real property leased by the Authority to the District under the terms of the Ground Lease. As of the date of this Discussion Draft, such legal description has not been prepared. For a general description of the real property involved, please refer to EXHIBIT C. , . . , , ° EXHIBIT . ~ ~ B ~ ~ / . . a / . ~ ~ , y , • ~ ~ i ~ . • ~ ~ ~ • . • ' , ~ ~ f V~i~!";~fi- ~ ~ N~ • • - • ~ ~ . . ~ ~ - _ . . . . . ~ , = . ~`~t~r~r ' . - . ' - - - . . • . - • j r~ ~ ! . . - . • l tr r'. . . . . r . • . ~ ~ ~ j . &umD-rp No. 6110 ' ~ • ' • , • . • r'~ ~ ~ ~ PU~~~ n 2 VVJ - ' . ~ . . ~ Qa ~ • . . . ~ ~ f ~ 't"~F ~t~~ ~ ' ~ • ~i \ \ U ,)ao' ".r-o' „~~p' ~ f ~I • ~ ~ _ • / ` r • ; '1,.~„~, r ~ 6ROUND LEASE THIS LEASE is made and entered into as of the 6th day of January, 1994 by and between EAGLE COUNTY RECREATION AUTHORITY, a quasi-municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, referred to in this Lease as the Authority, and EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50J, a public school district of the State of Colorado, referred to in this Lease as the District. The District and the Authority are collectively referred to in this Lease as Parties. IiITP1ESSETH: WHEREAS, the Authority is the owner of approximately 105 acres of real property in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described on the attached EXHIBIT A which is incorporated in this Lease by this reference; . WHEREAS, because of growth in the District's student enrollment, the District needs to construct a new elementary or middle school; WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that construction of a new school on approxi- mately 11.5 acres of the westerly portion of the Authority's real property as described on EXHIBIT A would be to the mutual advantage of both Parties in that the Authority would be able to jointly use a portion of the school site and school building; WHEREAS, at an election on November 2, 1993, voters within the District's boundaries authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness for sufficient funds to construct a school and related facilities; and, WHEREAS, the lease of the premises shall be made for a term, at the rental and pursuant to the covenants, terms, conditions, and other stipulations set forth in this Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. PREMISES AND TERM. 1.1 Demise. The Authority, in consideration of the rents, covenants, agreements and conditions hereinafter mentioned to be kept and performed by the District, does rent, lease and let to the District the real property described on the attached EXHIBIT B which is incorporated in this Lease by this reference and which is referred to as the School Site with all of the rights, privileges, easements and appurtenances thereunto attached and any way thereunto belonging. 1.2 Easements. The Authority hereby grants to the District a non- exclusive easement in gross over, above and across the Authority's real property as described on the attached EXHIBIT A so as to allow the District's employees, agents, officers, independent contractors, and invitees to: survey for and carry out construction of the proposed school and gain access to the School Site. 1.3 Term. The initial term of this Lease shall be 99 years, commencing at 12:01 A.M. on January l, 1994, and ending at 11:59 P.M. on December 31, 2093. 1.4 Renewal. This Lease shall automatically renew for ten additional ten- year terms unless one Party notifies the other Party in writing 360 days prior to the expiration of the existing term of the election not to renew the term of this Lease. 2. ANNUAL RENTAL. In consideration of the aforesaid demise and lease, the District hereby covenants and agrees to pay to the Authority an annual rental, in advance, in the amount of $1.00 commencing on the first day of this Lease and on each anniversary date (Anniversary Date) thereafter during the term of this Lease; provided, however, that the District reserves the right to prepay such annual rental. 3. RECREATION FACILITIES. 3.1 Facilities to Be Constructed. In further consideration of the aforesaid demise and lease, the District affirms that it is its present intent to construct and develop the School Site set forth on the Conceptual Site Plan attached as EXHIBIT C which is incorporated in this Lease by this reference. Final development plans shall be remitted to the Authority as soon as they become available. 3.2 Joint Use Agreement. Prior to completion of construction, the District and the Authority shall enter into a written Joint Use Agreement. Said use agreement shall allow use by the Authority of the School Site, and specify the time of use, fees to be paid, and maintenance and repair responsibilities. 4. QUIET ENJOYMENT. The Authority covenants so long as the District shall keep, observe and perform and all of the covenants and conditions of this Lease, the District shall and may peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the School Site for the term of this Lease free of interference from the Authority or those claiming through or under the Authority. This covenant shall be eonstrued as running with the land to and against subsequent owners and successors in interest. 5. TITLE TO IMPROVEMENTS. 5.1 Title Upon Construction. Upon construction, title to any improvements placed or erected upon the School Site by the District during the term of this Lease shall vest exclusively in the District. 5.2 Useful Life. The useful life of the improvements placed or erected upon the School Site by the District shall be deemed to be coterminous with the initial term of this Lease. 5.3 Title Upon Termination. If this Lease should terminate because of a default as described in paragraph 12 prior to expiration of the initial term, then, in that event, the Authority shall pay to the District that portion of the costs of improvements placed or erected upon the School Site which shall be the p`roportion which the remaining term of this Lease bears to the original term. Upon payment in full of such costs, the District shall execute such documents as are necessary to convey title, and thereupon title to the improvements placed or erected upon the School Site shall fully vest in the Authority. 2 5.4 Title Upon Expiration. Upon expiration of the initial term of this Lease, title to improvements placed or erected upon the School Site shall fully vest in the Authority; provided, however, should this Lease be renewed pursuant to paragraph 1.4 above, the improvements placed or erected upon the School Site shall be considered to be a part of'the School Site leased under this Lease, and use by the Authority of such improvements shall continue to be governed by paragraph 3.2 above. ~ 6. INSURANCE AND DESTRUCTION. 6.1 Insurance. The District shall, at all times during the term of this Lease, keep the School Site insured or implement self insurance, pursuant to Colorado law, for the mutual benefit of the Authority and the District against loss or damage by fire, and other standard risks. 6.2 Liability Insurance. The District further agrees throughout the term of this Lease it will maintain a self insurance plan or purchase commercial insurance for: a. Public liability insurance in an amount of not less than $150,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence, or such greater or lesser amounts as may be provided for in the Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-101, and following, Colorado Revised Statutes, protecting the District and the Authority against claims of any and all persons, firms and corporations for personal injury, death or property damage occurring upon, in or about the School Site, or in or about the adjoining streets, sidewalks, and passageways, such i nsurance to be i n the amount agreed upon by the Authori ty and the District; and, b. Appropriate workers' compensation insurance. 6.3 Cooperation. The Authority and the District each agree.it will cooperate with the other, to such extent the other may reasonably require, in connection with the prosecution or defense of any action or proceeding for the collection of any damages that may be due in the event of any loss or damage, and it will execute and deliver to such other Party such instru- ments as may be required to facilitate the recovery of any insurance monies. However, the costs and expenses incurred on behalf of and at the request of the District, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the Authority, of all such actions and proceedings shall be paid by the District. 6.4 Policy or Certificate. Each Party shall make available, at the other's request, copies of all policies or certificates of insurance which are relevant to the provisions of this Lease. 7. MAINTENANCE AND COVENANT AGAINST WASTE AND RI6HT OF INSPECTION. The District shall, throughout the term of this Lease, at no expense whatsoever to the Authority, cause good care to be taken of the School Site and shall promptly . cause to be made all repairs, interior or exterior, structural or non-structural, ordinary as well as extraordinary, foreseen as sell as unforeseen, necessary to keep the School Site in good and lawful order and condition. The Authority reserves the right to inspect the School Site at reasonable times, during the 3 term of this Lease. When used in this paragraph, the term "repairs" shall include reasonable replacement, restoration or renewals when necessary. The Authority shall not be required to make any expenditure whatsoever for.the maintenance or repair of the School Site, except as otherwise indicated in this Lease. References in this paragraph to School Site include all joint use facilities. 8. USE AND COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. 8.1 Use. The District agrees that the School Site will, during the term of this Lease, be used only for school purposes. The District shall have exclusive management over the School Site subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease. 8.2 Compliance. The District shall, throughout the term of this Lease, and at no expense whatsoever to the Authority, promptly cause compliance with all laws and ordinances and the orders, rules, regulations and requirements of duly constituted public authorities, existing or hereafter created, foreseen or unforeseen, ordinary as well as extraordinary, and whether the same shall presently be within the contemplation of the Parties hereto or shall involve any change of governmental policy or require structural or extra-ordinary repairs, alterations or additions and, irrespective of the cost thereof, which may be applicable to the School Site, and the repair and alteration thereof including, without limitation, the fixtures and equipment therein and the sidewalks and curbs, in any, adjoining the School Site or the use or manner of use of the School Site, and the repair and alteration thereof including, without limitation, the fixtures and equipment therein and the sidewalks and curbs, if any, adjoining the School Site. 8.3 Contest. Provided such will not subject the School Site to a foreclosable lien, the District shall have the right to contest, by. appropriate legal proceedings, without cost 'or expense to the Authority, the validity of any l.aw, ordinance, order, rule, regulation or requirement of a nature herein referred to and to postpone compliance with the same, provided that such contest shall be promptly and diligently prosecuted by and at the expense of the District, and further provided that the Authority shall not thereby suffer any civil, or be subject to any criminal penalties or sanctions, and that the Distric't shall properly protect and save harmless the Authority against any liability and claims for any such non- compliance or postponement or compliance. Further, if requested so to do by the Authority, the District shall first furnish the Authority a bond, in form and amount, and issued by a surety company reasonably satisfactory to the Authority, or post other security in such amount and such type reasonably satisfactory.to the Authority, guaranteeing to the Authority compliance by the District with such law, ordinance, order, rule, regulation, or requirement and indemnifying the Authority against any and all liability, loss and damage which the Authority may sustain by reason of the District's failure or delay in complying therewith. The Authority shall have the right, but shall be under no obligation, to contest by appropriate legal proceedings, at the District's expense, any such law, ordinance, rule, regulation or requirement. 4 8.4 Cooperation. The Authority agrees to cooperate in whatever way necessary to assist the District in obtaining zoning, use permits, and other authorizations necessary to effect the intent of this Lease. 9. PERMITS AND LICENSES. The District shall, at its sole cost and expense, cause to be procured any and all necessary permits, licenses or other authorizations required for the lawful and proper use, occupation, operation and management of the School Site. 10. UTILITIES. 10.1 Utilities. The Authority shall not be required to furnish any utility services to the School Site, including, but not limited to, heat, sewer, water, and electrical power. Except when due to the negligence of the Authority, the Authority shall not be liable for any failure of water or gas supply or electric current or of any other service by any utilities; for injury to persons (including death) or damage to the School Site resulting from steam, gas, electricity, water, rain or snow which may flow or leak from any part of the School Site, or from any pipes, appliances or plumbing works, from the street or subsurface, or from any other place; or for interference with light or other easements, however caused. The District shall pay all charges for steam, gas, electricity, water, light, heat, power and other services used in or about or supplied to the School Site, and shall indemnify the Authority against any liability on such account. The District agrees that all electricity, gas and water usage for the School Site shall be separateiy metered. 10.2 Easements. The District shall have the right to enter into agreements with utility companies creating easements in favor of such companies as are required in order to service the School Site with consent of the Authority, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Authority covenants and agrees to consent thereof and to execute any and all documents, agreements and instruments, and to take all other actions in order to effectuate the same, all at the District's costs and expense. 11. ASSIGNMENT, SUBLETTING, CONVEYANCING AND ENCUMBERING. The District shall not sublease, assign, or encumber, in whole or in part, any portion of the School Site, or any part thereof, to any other person or entity, excepting, - however, a successor public entity performing the same functions as the District, without the prior written consent of the Authority, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Such requirement of consent shall be deemed to be waived by the Authority if written consent or disapproval is not given by the Authority with 30 days of the District's written request to sublease, assign, or encumber. 12. DEFAULTS. The occurrence of any of the following events shall constitute a default by the District under this Lease: 12.1 Failure to Comply with the Terms and Conditions. The District shall violate or fail to comply with any material provision, term, or condition of this Lease. 12.2 Injunction. Any third person shall obtain an order or decree in any court of competent jurisdiction permanently enjoining or prohibiting the District or the Authority from performing this Lease, or permanently 5 enjoining or prohibiting the District from going forward with construction or any material part of the School Site in accordance with the plans and specifications. Notice of any such lawsuit shall be provided to the other Party in a timely manner so such other Party may join the suit if it chooses to do so. ' 12.3 Remedies and Notice. Upon the happening of any one or more of these events of default, the Authority will, then or at any time thereafter, and while such event of default or defaults shall continue, give the District written notice of the Authority's intention to terminate this Lease. The District shall have 30 days following its receipt of such notice within which to cure such default or defaults. On the date specified in such notice, unless the event of default is curable and is cured, the District's right to possession of the School Site shall cease and the District shall peaceably and quietly yield to and surrender.to the Authority the School Site, and this Lease shall thereupon be terminated and all of the right, title and interest of the District in the School Site shall wholly cease and expire in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if the date of expiration of such giving of notice or 30-day period, as the case may be, were the date originally specified for the expiration of this. Lease. The District shall then quit and surrender the School Site to the Authority but the District shall remain liable as provided in this Lease. The District shall have the right to cure any event of default and reinstate this Lease by action within such 30-day period. 12.4 Repossession. Upon any termination of this Lease, or as otherwise permitted by law, or if an event of default shall continue beyond the expiration of any grace period, the Authority shall exercise its rights under paragraph 5 above. 13. SURRENDER. On the last day of the term of this Lease, or any extension thereof, or upon any earlier termination of this Lease pursuant to paragraph 12 above, or otherwise, the District shall surrender the School Site to the Authority without delay, and subject to the Authority's exercise of its rights under paragraph 5 above. 14. THE AUTHORITY'S RIGHT TO PERFORM THE DISTRICT'S COVENANTS. 14.1 Payments. If the District shall at any time fail to pay for or maintain any of the insurance policies provided for in paragraph 6 above, within the time therein permitted, or to make any other payment or perform any other act on its part to be made or performed within the time permitted by this Lease, then the Authority, after 20 days' notice to the District (or, in case of any emergency, on such notice, or without notice, as may be reasonable under the circumstances) and without waiving or releasing the District from any obligation of the District hereunder, may (but shall not be required to): a. Pay for and maintain such insurance policies provided for in paragraph 6 above; or b. Make such other payment or perform such other act on the District's part to be made or performed as provided in this Lease, and may enter upon the School Site for such purpose and take all such action thereon as may be necessary therefor. 6 . ( ~ . ; 14.2 Reimbursement. The Authority shall be reimbursed by the District for i ts costs of maki ng payment or performi ng any such act provi ded for by paragraph 14.1 above. 15. NOTIICES. 15.1 Notices. Every notice'and other communication required or permitted under the terms of this Lease, shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly given if sent by registered or certified mail, postage fully prepaid, addressed to the Party to be given such notice or other communication and, when so addressed, shall be deemed to have been properly served, valid and sufficient for all purposes hereof, 72 hours after being " deposited in a United States Post Office. 15.2 Addresses. All notices and other communications to the Parties shall be mailed to their respective addresses as indicated below: a. Authority: Eagle County Recreation Authority 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 and Eagle County Recreation Authority % Lynn K. Robertson Benchmark Plaza, Suite 201 48 East, Beaver Creek Boulevard Avon, Colorado 81620 b. District: Eagle County School District RE-50J Attention: Superintendent P.O. Box 740 Eagle, Colorado 81631 and Eagle County School District RE-50J , % Daniel F. Bernard, Esq. Grant, Bernard, Lyons & Gaddis, P.C. P.O. Box 978 Longmont, Colorado 80502-0978 The Parties reserve and shall have the right to change from time to time their said respective addresses for the purposes of this Lease. Every such change of address shall be by notice in writing given in the manner described in paragraph 15.1 above. 16. INDEMNIFICATION OF THE AUTHORITY. The District shall indemnify and save harmless, except for claims arising out of the acts or omissions of the Authority, to the extent provided by law, the Authority and any assignee of the Authority's interest in this Lease or the School Site against and from all liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, claims, costs, charges and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be imposed upon or incurred by or asserted against the Authority or such assignee by reason of any of the following occurring during the term of this Lease: 7 ?b.l Any work or thing done in, on, or about the Schoo] Site or any part thereof; 16.2 Any use, non-use, possession, occupation, condition, operation, maintenance or management of the School Site, or any public street, alley or sidewalk, or other space adjacent thereto; , 16.3 Any negligence on the part of the District or any of its agents, servants, or employees; 16.4 Any accident, injury, or damage to any person or property occurring in, on, or about the School Site or any part thereof or any public street, alley, or sidewalk of other space adjacent thereto not the result of the Authority's negligence; 16.5 Any failure by the District to perform or comply with any of the covenants, agreements, terms, or conditions contained in this Lease on its part to be performed or complied with; or, 16.6 Any tax attributable to the execution, delivery of recording of this Lease or any modification hereof. In case any action or proceeding is brought against the Authority, or its assignee, by reason of any claim, the District, upon written notice from the Authority or such assignee, will, at the District's expense, resist or defend such action or proceeding by counsel approved by the Authority or such assignee in writing, such approval not to be unreasonab]y withheld or delayed. 17. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the Authority and the permitted successors and permitted assigns of the District. 18. ADD%TIONAL PROVISIONS. 18.1 Fencing. 7he District agrees that its use of the School Site will require the installation of appropriate fencing (at the District's expense) to separate the School Site from adjacent properties, including the railroad and pasture land. 18.2 Facilities on School Site. A part of the consideration for this Lease will be the District's expenditure of approximately $1,955,170 for improve- ments to the School Site which are unique to the Site, and for construction of a full-size gymnasium and a separate public locker room with rest room facility access, all of which will be a direct benefit to the Authority. The District agrees that it will maintain the gymnasium, the locker room and the playing and athietic fields during the term of this Lease; pro- vided, however, that the Parties agree that the District shall be solely responsible for the costs of operating and maintaining those portions of its facilities which are being jointly used with other entities; and further provided, however, that the District reserves the right to charge, from time to time, reasonable user fees to non-District users of the facilities in order to provide sufficient funds to the District to reimburse the District for the pro-rated portion of its expenses attributable to non-District users of the facilities. Such user fees shall not exceed the District's actual costs. 8 18.3 Irrigation Water. The Authority agrees to furnish necessary treated or untreated water, as and if available, to the District for those portions of the School Site which require irrigation at no cost to the Authority and as long as the Authority does not need such water for its own purposes. The Di stri ct acknowl edges that i t may i n the future be requi red to buy treated water or rent or buy water rights to untreated water for such purposes. 19. WAIVER. The waiver by either Party of any breach by the other of any term, covenant or condition contained in this Lease shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or other term, covenant, or condition. 20. SHORT FORM LEASE. The Parties mutually agree that at the time of the execution of this Lease, each will, upon request of the other, execute and acknowledge a short form Lease which may be recorded; provided, however, that the Parties reserve the right to record this Lease. 21. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Lease contains the entire agreement between the Authority and the District with respect to the subject matter hereof and super- sedes and cancels any prior understandings and agreements between the Authority and the District with respect to the subject matter of this Lease. 22. PARAGRAPH HEADINGS. The paragraph headings in this Lease are inserted for convenience and are not intended to indicate completely or accurately the contents of the paragraphs they introduce, and shall have no bearing on the construction of the paragraphs they introduce. 23. INVALIDITY. If any term or provision of this Lease or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term of this Lease shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Lease as of the date and year first above written. EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50J By Dan Corcoran, Presi ent, Boar o ucation P.O. Box 740 Eagle, Colorado 81631 (303) 328-6321 (303) 328-1024 (Fax) 9 ~ ATTEST: ecretary EAGLE COUNTY RECREATION AUTHORITY By Howar Gar, ner, C airperson 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 949-4020 ATTEST: (303) 476-7325 (Fax) Secretary STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. , COUNTY OF EAGLE ) . The foregoing Ground Lease was acknowledged before me this day of , 1994, by Dan Corcoran, as President, and by Di strlct R -50J, as, Secretary, of the Board of Education of Eagle County School . Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Pu ic STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE The foregoing Ground Lease was acknowledged before me this day of , 1994, by Howard Gardner, as Chai rman, and by as Secretary, of Eagle County Recreation Authority. Witness my hand and official seai. My commission expires: otary u ic orsse 10 YAKC:t:L A . . A parcel land located in the W 1/2 of Secn 4 and the NE 1/4 of Sect-on 5, Township 5 South, Range 82 hCst of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Eagle, State of Colorado. More particularly described as follows: BeginninV at a point on the southerly right-of-way for Interstate Highway 70 from which the northwest corner of said Section 4 bears, N. 30 degrees 37'20"W. 2103.11 feet; thence S. 58 degrees 13130"E. along the I-70 right-of-way line 318.59 feet; thence departing from the I-70 right-of-way S. 41 degrees 58143"W. 141.00 feet; thence S. 48 degrees 01117"E. 150.00 feet; thence N. 41 degrees 58143"E. 150.00 feet to a point on the I-70 right-of-way; thence continuing along the I-70 right-of-way•128.41 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 2126.80 feet whose chord bears S. 44 degrees 56142"E. 128.39 feet; continuing along said right-of-way line, S. 40 degrees 41'3011E. 289.10 feet, continuing along said right-of-way line, S. 39 degrees 281'0011E. 296.10 feet; continuing along said right-of-way S. 43 degrees 53130"E. 366.70 feet; continuing along the arc of a tangent curvey~Le left 540.50 feet having a radius of 1787.00 feet, whose chord bears S. 54 degrees 15'22"E. 538.45 feet to a point on the east line of the SW 1/4 Section 4; thence departing from the Interstate 70 right-of-way and continuing along the east line of the SW 1/4 Section 4 S. 01 degrees 23101"W. 1372.38 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad; continuing along said right-of-way . 72.81 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1810.00 feet whose chord bears N. 67 degrees 23140"W. 72.80 feet; thence continuing alongr said right-of-way N. 66 degrees 14'3111W. 1553.35 feet; continuing along said right-of-way N. 89 degrees 441120"W. 121.64 feet; continuing along said right-of-way 1671.11 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 1860.00 feet whose chord bears N. 38 degrees 11159"W. 1615.47 feet; continuing along said right-of-way N. 12 degrees 27140"W. 171.74 feet; continuing along said right-of-way N. 01 deVrees 25133"E. 130.18 feet; continuing along the said right-of-way N. 15 degrees 23159"W. 299.69 feet to a point on the easterly side of the State Highway No. 6 access road right-of-way; thence continuing along the access road right-of-way N. 77 degrees 39'01"E. 16.50 feet; continuing along said right-of-way N. 73 • degrees 27130"E. 220.57 feet; continuing along said right-of-way 141.69 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 577.50 feet whose chord bears N. 58 degrees 37118"E. 141.34 feet; thence departing from the access road right-of-way S. 55 degrees 16112"E. 400.00 feet; thence N. 35 degrees-17128"E. 480.81 feet; thence N. 70 degrees 21100"W. 285.47 feet; thence N. 86 degrees 45100"W. 148.20 feet to a point on the State Highway No. 6 access road right-of-way; ' thence N. 25 deqrees 27'30"E. 27.00 feet to a point on the Interstate 70 right-of-way; thence along the Interstate 70 right-of-way S. 86 degrees 45100"E. 141.60 feet; thence continuing alonq said right-of-way S. 70 degrees 21100"E. 550.20 ' feet, to the point of beginning. PARCEL B ' A parcel of land located in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 82 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: - Beginning at a point on the west line of Section 4 from which the southwest corner of the NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 4 bears S. 01 degrees 25133"W. 254.00 feet; thence along the west line of Section 4 N. 01 degrees 25133"E. 802.17 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way of the Denver Rio Grande and Western Railroad; thence departing from the west line'of . ' • Section 4 and continuing along the railroad right-of-way along a ' curve to the left an arc length of 1378.34 feet, having a radius of 1960.00 feet, a central angle of 40 degrees 17f33" and • a chord bearing S. 38 degrees 17102"E. 1350.12 feet to a point on the south line of the NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Section 4; thence departing from the railroad right-of-way and continuing along the south line of the NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 N. 89 degrees 44'20"W. . 322.76 feet to the centerline of the Eagle River; thence , departing from the south line of the NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 and continuing along the centerline of.the.Eagle River the following four (4) courses: 1) N. 10 degrees 44120"W. 123.00 feet; 2) N. 62 clegrees 28145"W. 181.07 feet; „ EXHIBIT 3) N. 87 degrees 55151"W. 209.11 feet; ~ 4) N. 72 degrees 34127"W. 148.00 feet; to the point of beginning. A EXHIBIT B is to be the specific legal description of the approximately 11.5 acres of real property leased by the Authority to the District under the terms of the Ground Lease. As of the date of this Discussion Draft, such legal description has not been prepared. For a general description of the real property involved, please refer to EXHIBIT C. - EXHIBIT 6 z . . 8 , ~ B ar---+ ~ , N ~ n' f f~ ` - , y • ' ~ ~ i ~ ~ . • ~ ~ • . • " . ` H~~{L L I N~ ~ ' • • ~ ' . . ~ - - . . . . . . ~ - = _ ~~t~rn' . f~ . . . . . . . . • . - 4~~e`r''''~ . ~ ~ 1 r r r . ~ 1 ~ . . ~ . - , ~ _ Blume.r0 No. alte • ' - - _ , y~ • ~ . 1 • ~ _ r ` ~ f V ~ / ~ J W m • • . . ~ - . . n W , 4a~'VJ . • , t 1 • ~ , - ~ ~?~~P-rv~i. ~ s ~-t~ ~~rJ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ , , . ~ Ga-~rao U ~'~t-t'~' ~ ~f•~..{ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~'~i~~-- T+~. f% { ~ ~1 . ~ ~ . • ' . / l ~ ~ \ ' ~~~~g v • ~ • / \ \ ~ I )Co' p •,ao' ~ ~,,:o` „44 ~ • / f ` : T t - 1, - ~ ~,~~r-'r-~rf. . + JOINT USE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES. The parties to this Joint Use Agreement (Agreement) are EAGLE COUNTY RECREATION AUTHORITY, a quasi-municipal corporation of the State of Colorado (Authority), and EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50J, a public school district of the State of Colorado (District). 2. RECITALS AND PURPOSE. The Authority is the owner of certain real property leased to the District pursuant to the terms of that certain Ground Lease dated January 6, 1994 (Lease) which Lease is incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. The parties have also entered into that certain Letter of Intent dated January 5, 1994 regarding the Berry Creek School Site (School Site) which Letter is incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. The District has agreed to construct a middle school or an elementary school on the School Site which will contain a full-size gymnasium and a separate public locker room with rest room facility and access, along with playing fields, athletic fields and parking lots. The parties desire to jointly participate in the use of such facilities after they have been completed and constructed and, by the terms of this Agreement, to outline the general terms and conditions of such joint use. Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth in this Agreement, the parties covenant and agree to the terms and conditions set forth in the following paragraphs. 3. DURATION. The term of this Agreement shall be identical to the term of the Lease and any termi nati on of the Lease shal l 1 i kewi se cause a termi nati on of th i s Agreement. 4. CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES. The District will construct, within the• completion deadlines set forth on the attached EXHIBIT A, the recreational facilities mentioned above which are further described on EXHIBIT A. 5. COMMENCEMENT OF USE. The parties agree that the facilities described on EXHIBIT A shall become available for joint use upon their completion but, in any case, not later than , 199 6. USE OF FACILITIES. The District shall be responsible for and shall schedule all use of the facilities, including providing appropriate crowd control measures and crowd control personnel on those occasions when large gatMerings of persons take place at the facilities. All usage of the facilities by the District or the Di stri ct' s students or empl oyees wi 11 be schedul ed by the Di stri ct i n such a man- ner as to permit the District to fulfill its own educational/recreational needs. The parties acknowledge that the District may, with the prior written consent of the Authority, assign certain of the District's duties and responsibilities under this Agreement to a private or public third-party management agency. 7. SCHOOL YEAR SCHEDULING. The District shall have priority use of the facil- ities during the normal school year as it may now or hereafter exist; provided, however, that the District's use of the facilities is not intended to be exclu- sive at any time. Scheduling for the District's educational uses shall be accomplished on an annual basis and agreed to by the parties prior to the com- mencement of each school year and prior to a general scheduling of the facilities by the Authority subject to any revisions mutually agreed upon during the normal school year. Representatives of the parties will meet on a quarterly basis to review the schedule. The parties' agreements concerning scheduling of specific facilities are described on the attached EXHIBIT B. In the event of any conflict between this paragraph 7 and the provisions of EXHIBIT B, this paragraph 7 shall control. 8. LICENSE.- The District reaffirms its license to the Authority for non- District users of the facilities to utilize the District's access ways, roadways, and parking facilities, so long as such use by the Authority does not interfere with the District's needs. In consideration for this right to use the District's parking lots during such time as they are not in use by the District, and, if requested to do so, the Authority will post signs to the entrances to such parking lots stating that public parking in such lots is prohibited during the times when they are being used by the District. 9. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. Maintenance and repair of the facilities shall be the sole responsibility of the District; provided, however, that the District reserves the right to charge, from time to time, reasonable user fees to non- District users of the facilities in order to provide sufficient funds to the District to reimburse the District for the pro-rated portion of its expenses attributable to non-District users of the facilities. Such user fees shall not exceed the District's actual costs. 10. UN-CONTEMPLATED ISSUES. The parties acknowledge that, over the term of this Agreement, numerous issues will arise concerning implementation of this Agreement which the parties have not contemplated and which are not addressed in this Agreement. Recognizing that a high level of cooperation between the parties is necessary and desirable, the parties agree to consult with each other from time to time concerning the implementation of this Agreement or related issues and further agree that their respective representatives will meet at reasonable times and places upon ten days' written request given by one party to the other party to negotiate in good faith concerning such issues. 11. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall not be assigned or delegated except with the prior written consent of the parties. 12. NOTICES. Every notice or other communication required or permitted under the terms of this Agreement shall be governed by paragraph 15 of the Lease entitled "Notices." 13. EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are, by reference, incorporated in this Agreement for all purposes. 14. PARAGRAPH CAPTIONS. The captians of the paragraphs are set forth only for convenience and reference, and are not intended in any way to define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement. 15. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS OR ACTION. The parties agree to execute any additional documents and to take any additional action necessary to carry out this Agreement. 16. INTEGRATION AND AMENDMENT. This Agreement represents the entire agreement' between the parties and there are no oral or collateral agreements or understandings. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing signed by the parties. 2 17. ARBITRATION. Pursuant to Rule 109 of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, all controversies, claims, or disputes arising out of or relating to this Agree- ment, or any alleged breach thereof, shall be determined by arbitration in Eagle, Colorado in accordance with the rules of the American Arb-itration Association then in effect. The arbitration award shall be advisory only. The expenses of witnesses for either side shall be paid by the party producing such witnesses. The cost of the stenographic record, if any is made, and all transcripts thereof, shall be prorated.equally among all parties ordering copies thereof unless they shall agree otherwise, and shall be paid for by such parties directly to the reporting agency. All other expenses of the arbitration, including the expenses of the arbitrator, and the expenses of any witness or the cost of any proofs produced at the direct request of the arbitrator, shall be shared equally by the parties, unless they agree otherwise or unless the arbitrator in his award assesses such expenses against a particular party or parties. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties,.submission of all controversies, claims, or disputes arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the terms of this paragraph as a condition precedent to the institu- tion of any civil action in the courts of the State of Colorado. 18. WAI•NER OF BREACH. The waiver by any party to this Agreement of a breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by any party. 19. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties, and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns; provided, however, that nothing contained in this paragraph shall be construed to permit the assignment of this Agreement except as otherwise specifically authorized in this Agreement. 20. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. 21. SEYERASILITY. If any provision of this Agreement is declared to be invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be severable, and all other provisions of this Agreement shall remain fully enforceable, and this Agreement shall be interpreted in all respects as if such provision were omitted. 22. DATED. January 6, 1994. EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-50J By Dan Corcoran, Presi ent, Boar o ucation P.O. Box 740 Eagle, Colorado 81631 (303) 328-6321 ATTEST: (303) 328-1024 (Fax) ecretary 3 _ • ~ EAGLE COUNTY RECREATION AUTHORITY By owar ar, ner, C airperson 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 949-4020 ATTEST: (303) 476-7325 (Fax) Secretary STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) The foregoing Joint Use Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of , 19949 by Dan Corcoran, as President, and by , as Secretary, of the Board of Educati on of Eagl e County School Di strict RE-50J. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Pu ic , STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE The foregoing Joint Use Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of , 19949 by Howard Gardner, as Chairman, and by , as ecretary, of Eagle County Recreation Authority. - Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary u ~c G,05" 4 ~ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA , February 16, 1994 3:00 P.M. PROJECT ORIENTATiON 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm SITE VISITS 1:30 pm - 3:00 pm 1. Dauphinais - 1320 Moraine Drive. 2. Brown - 1245 Westhaven Circle. 3. Antlers - 680 West Lionshead Place. 4. Chapel Bridge - Vail Road Bridge over Gore Creek. 5. Rocky Mountain Clothing Works - 186 East Gore Creek Drive. 6. Ted Kindel Park - Mill Creek Court. 7. Tait - 1855 Sunburst Drive. Drivers: Randy and Jim 1. Ted Kindel. Park - Park and stream improvements for Mill Creek. TO/KP Site is to the east of the Mill Creek Court Building. Applicant: Town of Vail MOTION: Borne SECO.ND: Brainerd VOTE: 5-0 Approved with Conditions. 2. Chapet Bridge - Replacement of bridge. KP/GH Vail Road Bridge over Gore Creek adjacent to the Interfaith Chapel and Sonnenalp. Applicant: Town of Vail MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Tabled to March 2, 1994. 3. Rocky Mountain Clothing Works - Window replacement and cofor change MM to existing awning. 186 East Gore Creek Drive/Lodge at Vail Promenade. Applicant: Donna Foster MOTION: Borne SECOND: Brainerd VOTE: 5-0 Approved with conditions. 4. Moose's Caboose - Review of proposed sign (conceptual). RS 291 Bridge StreeUPlaza Lodge Building. Applicant: George Knox MOTION: Borne SECOND: Brainerd VOTE: 5-0 Approved with conditions. ~ .5. Antlers -Exterior alteration. RS 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association MOTION: Brainerd SECOND: Borne VOTE: 5-0 Approved with. conditions. 6. Brown - New Residence. AK 1245 Westhaven Circle/Lot 36, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Daryl Brown MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Tabled to March 2, 1994. 7. Moore - 250 request for an interior expansion of the second floor. AK 5017 Main Gore Drive, Unit 1/Gore Creek Condominiums, Building A, Unit 1. Applican#: Hate W. Moore MOTION: Borne SECOND: Bowen VOTE: 5-0 Approved with conditions. 8. Tait - Remodel for addition to kitchen, living and bedrooms including JC 250 addition application. 1855 Sunburst Drive/Lot 6, Vail Valley 3rd Filing. Applicant: Cliff Tait MOTION: Borne SECOND: Woldrich VOTE: 5-0 Approved with conditions. 9. Dauphinais - Conceptual review of new primary/secondary residence. JC 1320 Moraine Drive/Parcel D, Lionsridge 3rd Filing. Applicant: Pat Dauphinais MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Conceptual only. 10. Bellville - Change to approved plans. AK 4440 Glen Falls Lane/Lot 14, Forest Glen Subdivision. Applicant: R.A. Froberg MOTION: Borne SECOND: Bowen VOTE: 5-0 Tabled to March 2, 1994. 2 , t MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Hans Woldrich Jeff Bowen (PEC) Sally Brainerd Mike Arnett Bob Borne STAFF APPROVALS Rocky Mountain Clothing Works - Hanging Sign. 186 East Gore Creek Drive/The Lodge at Vail. Applicant: Donna Foster Wendy's - Add three light fixtures. 2399 North Frontage Road WesUUnplatted parcel. Applicant: Wendy's Vail Partnership Salad Garden - New display box and daily special board. 292 East Meadow Drive, #1 /Block 5, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Scott Medsker 3 F ~ ao~J •k~ bl~. ~co ROBERT E. FORD 2765 BALD MOUNTAIN ROAD. VAIL, COLORADO 81657 February 13,1994 Mr. Merv Lapin Councilman - Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Dear Merv, I just want to let you and the council know how appreciative I am of the new evening parking rules that were adopted this year. The additional free hours now available if you enter the structures after 6:00 PM is absolutely a terrific idea. My experience with my friends and house guests is that this new rule has encouraged more business to remain in Vail and not go down valley. I know you miss the funds lost for adopting these new hours, but I definitely feel it is worth it. The slow down in business throughout the Vail valley this year highlights how competitive the tourist ski business has become. The toughest competitor for our restaurants is just 10 miles down the road - Avon and Beaver Creek. I am very pleased to see the council give a break to the locals and }ourists alike. I would appreciate your circulating this letter to your fellow council members. Cordi y, Rob Ford (V,s a04 -y f atrLer N \ TOWN OF VAIL 42 West Meadow Drive Vail Fire Department Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2250 February 22, 1994 Town of Vail Council Members 73 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Council Members, For the past two years I have enjoyed the opportunity to serve the Town cf Vail's interests by serving on the Board of Directors for Channei 5. It has been enlightening and a valuable learning experience for me, and, I hope, productive for the Town. I now find myself, however, involved in many other personal interests, and feel it would serve the Town's interests if someone with more time and new ideas and enthusiasm could step in at this time. I have notified Frian Hall and told him of my decision to resign from the Board of Directors effective immediately. Again, thank you for the opportunity to serve on this Board. I look forward serving the Town in new and challenging assignments as they accur. c ~ f:ffff At encio Fire Inspector Vail Fire Department cc: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Dick Duran, Fire Chief . . . . . ~ ?~.~r,u-~ RECEIVED F B 01 1994, _ . , ~ January 31, 1994 ~ FROM: Booth Creek Local Improvement District Homeowners RE: "Vail Trail" article of January 14, 1994 discussing the "East Vail Berm Suit." Dear Members of the Vail Town Council: While most of you have probably seen the article in the Vail Trail on January 14, 1994, I am enclosing an extra copy for those of you that have not. I am also enclosing a copy of the financial information that was provided to us by the Town of Vail in the meeting last summer. The purpose of this letter is to further comment on the context of the article. Dr. Steinberg's comment that the "value of our homes was almost zero" prior the construction of the berm is simply not true. Additionally, we submit that the Town of Vail "created" the hazard zone with the instant result that all property values in the neighborhood dropped. Perhaps the Town should have been concerned about the rock fall hazard before allowing the subdivision to be developed. In reference to the "favorable" interest rates the Town was able to procure for its citizens, the Town of Vail only agreed to refinance the bonds at the current lower rate after pressure from the homeowners. We shou{d be grateful to get a rate that any person who walks into a bank could have obtained? One would hope that the Town would attempt to get the lowest rate possible for its citizens as a matter of course. As regards the Town's "reluctant" undertaking of the construction project, let it be known that the homeowners in the district were willing to manage the construction ourselves but were prohibited from the task by the Town of Vail. As citizens and taxpayers of the Town of Vail, we felt it important that the berm be constructed for the safety of our homes and families and to restore our property values. We accepted a bid for this project, with a 15% cost overrun provision. No one is disputing that we pay that amount. That we should gratefully pay an additional 32% just because our houses are now worth more (along with all Eagte County real estate) was not part of the contract. Nor was it our agreement that we should pay for the Town's mismanagement. If govemment makes mistakes or errors in judgement, engages non-performing contractors, commits to the unreasonable and unnecessary expenditures of funds, then such costs are borne by all taxpayers, not a select few. Had there been any communication from the Town of Vail Management to the homeowners in the district informing us of the problems with the project and the rapidly accruing interest, we believe that alternative forms of financing and payment could have been worked out. We were - not given that option. Sincerely yours, Booth Creek Local Improvement District Homeowners._ cc: Vail Trail . ' I 6ooth Creek Special Asse3wm$nt District Budget (Over) Percent . Original Actuai' Under Over ~ Budget Budget 8udget Revenue: . Contrbutions: Town of Vail 20,000 21,441 (1,441) Eagle County 20,000 (20,000) • Bond F'roceD „ds 365.000 36111,597 (2,697) Interest income 29.675 (29,675) Total Revenue 385,000 438,813 (53,813) Expenditures: Construction Costs 299,356 315,900 (16,544) Engineerin8 49,004 73,942 (24,942) Subtotal Construction 348,356 389,842 (41,486) 11.91% Engineering 21,088 (21,088) Legal ~ 30,690 30,690) Bond lssuance Cost . 18,640 10,024 8,576 Interest On Bonds 19,840 109,356' (89,556) Total Expenditures 386,756 561,000 (174,244) Shortfall (1,756) (122,187) (120,431) Bonds Payable 365,000 365,000 Tota-! Assessment 365,756 487,187 EXHIBIT bthbdgt ~ 15-Dec-92 ALLj'fATE IIGK MlRI OD. 12The Uat1naU - Janucuy 14, 1994 . : x • East Vail berm su• ~t p~ts town against residents - ~ Case may set precedent in dealing East Vail.property owners do said, had town officials allowed gineer was responsible for in- ~ not have a case. debt repayment on the project specting the berm, not the towri, r with special improvement districts Moorehead said requests for to begin during the lawsuit. and that the increased interest =F documents in the case went be- While aware of the town's payments were unavoidable. ~ By MIKE SPANIOLA the increase ° yond the scope of the suit filed. position, he points out that `By law, .we could not begin to Town of Vail officials refuse According to the suit, the The town's position is that the along_ with increased property collect the assessment until the ~b to budge in a lawsuit brought berm failed to meet town speci- sPecial improvement district values come increased tax rev- project was completed.' ~ against them by a group of East fications the first time because was properly created, and that enues for the town. "The prop- He also called the group's ~ Vail property owners, even tak- its construction was improperly Property owners have no case erty owners are indirectly pay- proposed settlement "absurd," ing one aspect of the case to the monitored by town officials. • beYond that point. ing for the berm a second time," and having "no relation to real- - State Supreme Court. When the suit was filed last Otto said. itj,," _ The Year-old lawsuit con- January, Vail officials asked for VAIL MOUNTAIN School Vail Councilman Tom Stein- In addition to the town hav- `r- cerns a sPecial imProvement a dismissal of the case, and occuPies one of the lots, and the berg said the town took the pro- ing refinanced the debt recently filed district formed to construct a a protective order to keep pro- school's treasurer, Vail attorney ject on reluctantly, and only at to the benefit of the East Vail rockslide barrier that protects ject documents from the prop- Fred Otto, said the case "has 'the urging of the neighboihood. home owners group, Steinberg 261ots in East Vail along Katsos erty owners. gotten out of hand for all the "We likely made a mistake said the project has involved a -~Ranch Road and Booth Falls However, when District wrong reasons." trying to help these people. We lot of town staff time, including Court. Court Judge William Jones in "What's gotten out of hand is were trying to save them finance, the council, and engi- The district was formed by Eagle ordered town officials to - the town at the request of the disclose the documents, Vail of- _ property owners after some ficials took the case to the State "What's gotten out of hand is the amount of money being spent on litigation.". ~ nearby Booth Falls condomini- Supreme Court, which sum- -Fred Otto, Vai11VIountain School treasurer. . ums were damaged by a rock- marily dismissed it, forcing the ' . - slide in 1988. town to turn over the docu- Construction of the half-mile- ments. the amount of money being money because the town could neering, that has saved the East long earthen -barrier, or berm, The Town of Vail, which to spent on litigation,° he said. do it cheaper having the benefit Vail group further expense. began late in the summer of date has epent $5,500 on the Otto said the group has of- of town bond rates." The plaintiffs, though, 'ha`ve 1989, and was to have cost case, is represented by attorney fered to settle the case, but the people in the neighborhood no plans to abandon their case, $14,000 per lot. Ike Kaiser of the Denver law town won't budge on its posi- could not sell their houses be- which A.nderson predicts will The berm, however, was im- firm of Berambaum and Wein- tion. cause of the rockslide danger, be decided in their favor: She properly compacted, and by the shenk. The school already had con- he said. also expects the town to appeal time it was completed in Sep- Town of Vail attorney Tom structed its own berm, but "The value of the houses was any such decision, and a" new tember 1992, cost overruns to- Moorehead inherited the case. Town of Vail staff inembers almost zero. Why should all the law regarding special improve-. - taled $120,000, raising charges from his predecessor Larry, convinced the school ofFcials to rest of the citizens in the com- ment districts may then result.: per lot by $4,600, or a total of Eskwith, who joined a private join the larger berm project munity subsidize these 26 lots •"Previous cases don't hold more than $18,000. law firm last summer. nonetheless. "They made a lot when the only ones. benefiting government entities to proper, Britt Anderson, a Vail attor- "We have provided disclo- of promises about it being are them," Steinberg said. management of special ':dis'= - ney representing the property sure to the plaintiffs, and that's cheaper, but it came out more "It was not mismanagement ~cts"she said. owners; said, "Aimost every- where the case stands," Moore- expensive." by the town that caused the cost In the meantime, the group'of body has paid the original as- head said. Otto said town officials spent increase. It was a problem with East Vai] property owneTS_ sessments. The lawsuit. con- The town's position is that approximately $30,000 to sue the contractor who did not sense an injustice beyond-the; ;F; cerns Lhe extra (charge) per berm has inereased property the berm's contractor, compil- compact the berm correctly, so case complaint. property owner. Our argument values by the amount of the to- ing at least $60,000 in additional we had to eventually sue the Jorge Navas, one of `the' . iE,: that there was no improve- tal construction charges, he interest payments during that contractor and the engineers in- plaintiffs, said, °I fee] like the . ment; it was mismanagement said. Because of the enhanced time. Those interest payments volved.° town is suing me with my own r~ on the town's part that caused value, the town believes the could have been nvoided, he qteinberg sttid the nrnin~t Pn- mnnev," TOWN OF VAIL MEMORANDUM TO: Robert McLaurin Council Members FROM: Judy Popeck . DATE: February 18, 1994 RE: Investment Report - Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of January 31, 1994. On January 18th, a FNMA matured for $215,000 and was used for the monthly payment for the police construction. No new purchases were made. The estimated average yield for the debt service fund was 4.24% and 3.42% for the pooled cash fund. Currently the yield curve for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.are 3.26%, 3.44%, and 3.72% respectively. Please call me if you have any questions. ' Town of Veil, Colorado lnvestment Report Sunnary of Accounts and lnvestments For the Month Ending January 31, 1994 Funds For Reserve Balanees Percentage Operating Funds 01/31/94 of Total _ Money Market Aceounts (see page 1) Conmercial Banks $162,362 $12,019 E174,381 1.17% Money Market and Mutual Furds $3,383,461 $7,305,367 $4,688,828 31.53% Colorado Investment Pools f3,914,077 E1,085,698 E4,999,775 33.62% Total f7,459,900 $2,403,084 E9,862,984 66.32% Camiercial Savings Banks 6 Loans Certificates of Deposit (see page 2) Eagle County Institutions 0.00% Other Lolorado Institutions $297,000 $297,000 $297,000 2.00% Nationel lnstitutions ` 0.00% Totat 5297,000 5297,000 E297,000 2.00X Percentage of Portfotio in Savings & Loans 0.00% U.S. Goverrment Securities (see page 3) ~ Treasury Notes 8 Bills E498,986 E779,935 E1,278,921 8.60% GNMA's E100,329 $100,329 0.67% U.S. Savings Bonds E26,001 526,001 0.17% Federal Agency Diseount Notes 8 eonds $1,499,869 E1,807,587 $3,307,456 22.24% Total E2,125,185 E2,587,522 E4,712,707 31.68% Total Portfolio $9,882,085 E4,990,606 514,872,691 100.00% Maturing Hithin 12 Months 58,058,769 E4,372,031 E12,430,800 83.58X Maturing Hithin 24 Months $198,000 $678,575 E816,575 5.49X Maturing After 24 Months E1,625,316 $1,625,316 10.92% f9,882,085 E4;990,606 E74,872,691 100.00% Breakdown of Reserve Funds • G.O. Bbnd Reserve $1,923,942 1992 eond Proceeds f2,192,287 Housing Bond Proceeds E862,358 Chuck Anderson Memorial E10,991 Health Insurarxe Funds $1,028 54,990,606 . 2/15/94j1p invsml . -Money Market Accounts as of January 37, 1994 --For the Month of January-- , Institution Balances Type of Accounts Nigh Low Average 01/37/94 COMMERCIAL BANK ACCWNTS First Bank of Vail - Operating • Interest 3.030% 2.070% 2.530% $125,130 Balance $1,300,081 $40,244 $378,231 First Bank ot Vail - Insurance Interest 3.030% 2.070% 2.530% $1,028 Balance Central Bank of Denver Interest 2.300% Generat Operating Account . Balance $48,223 . 7otai Commercial Bank Accounts $174,381 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS Colorado Trust Operating Account Interest 2.960% Balance $66,355 Colorado Trust Housing Bond Proceeds ~ Interest 2.960% Balance $862,358 CSAFE - Bond Proceeds Interest 3.090% ealance $223,340 CSAFE Interest 3.090% Balance g3,847,722 Total Local Goverronent Investment Pools Accounts $4,999,775 MONEY MARKET fUNDS First American Corp. Trust Treasury Fund Interest 2.480% Balance $1,032,259 Fidelity Investment Goverrnient Money Market Accounts Interest 2,750% Bond lssue Reserve Account Balance $273,108 Operating Account Balance $2,329,451 Overland Express Interest 4.000% ealance $1,054,010 Total Money Market and Mutual Funds $4,688,828 Total all accounts $9,862,984 **Account Subject to Arbitrage Rebate 2/15/94j1p invrtm1 . Page 1 , ' Certificates of Deposit as of January 31, 1994 Bank Name, Location Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity - . Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value BestBank, Thornton Colorado FDIC 4.750% 4.600% 16-feb-93 13-Feb-95 378 $99,000 Paonia State Bank, Paonia Colorado FDIC 4.400% 4.250% 17-Aug-93 15-Feb-95 380 $99,000 Bank of Greeley, Greeley Colorado FDIC 4.250% 4.000% 16-Jun-93 16=Jun-94 136 $99,000 Avg Yield 4.283% $297,000 invcdl 2/15/94j1p Page 2 as of January 31, 1994 ***Treasury Notes 8 Bills*** - n . Days ~ to Days ' Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity to Book Par Type Fund •Coupon Yield Date Oate at Purchase Maturity Value Value TNote Pooled 4.250% 4.340% 17-May-93 15-May-96 1094 835 $498,986 $500,000 TBill Bond Proceed 3.360% 25-Oct-93 22-Sep-94 332 234 $100,831 $103,000 Teill Bond Proceed 3.390% 25-Oct-93 24-Oct-94 364 266 $60,529 $62,000 . 2ero Debt Service 7.820% 21-Jun-91 15-Nov-95 1608 653 $618,575 $700,000 Average Yield 5.90% $1,278,921 $1,365,000 Average Days to Maturity 497 ***GNMAIS*** Years to Estimated interest Rate . Purchase Maturity Maturity Years.to Principal Pool Coupon Yield Oate Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding 5803 8.000% 8.480% 14-Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 76.00 $29,211 13003 8.000% 9.500% 24-Oct-86 15-Oct-06 20.20 17.00 $30,405 14659 8.OOOY 9.200% 24-Oct-86 15-Jan-O7 21.20 18.00 840,713 Avg Yield . 9.081% $100,329 ***U.S. Savings Bonds*** Years to Issue Maturity Maturity Years to Book Maturity Series Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Yalue EE 7.170% 01-Oct-86 01-Oct-96 10.00 2.67 $26,001 $30,000 ***Federal Agency Discount Notes 8 Bonds*** Days to Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Book Maturity Agency Fund Coupon `t Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value FFC Pooled 4.150% 4.150% 25-Mar-93 25-Mar-96 1096 784 $500,000 $500,000 PFC Pooled 3.560% 3.641% 07-Jun-93 01-Jun-94 359 121 $499;869 $500,000 FHIM Bond Proceed 3.190% 25-Oct-93 18-Feb-94 116 78 $309,516 $310,000 FHLB Bond Proceed 3.210% 25-Oct-93 15-Mar-94 141 43 $229,140 $230,000 FNMA Bond Proceed 3.240% 25-Oct-93 15-Apr-94 172 74 $158,964 $160,000 FNMA Bond Proceed 3.230% 25-Oct-93 09-May-94 196 98 $252,799 $255,000 FNMA Bond Proceed 3.260% 25-Oct-93 06-Jun-94 224 126 $222,504 $225,000 PFC Bond Proceed 3.320% 25-Oct-93 18-Ju1-94 266 168 $384,176 $390,000 FHLB Bond Proceed 3.360% 25-Oct-93 15-Aug-94 294 196 8250,488 $255,000 fHLM Pooted 4.560% 4.560% 03-Jun-93 03-Jun-96 1096 854 $500,000 $500,000 • $3,307,456 $3,325,000 ' Average Yield 3.65% Average Days to Maturity 248 Total $4,712,707 2/15/94j1p invtrl Page 3 Nc;; C:di,v~-~~ , 1660 Lincoln Street Denver, CO 802642601 RECEIVED rE D 1 0 1994 303861•5555 FAX 303 831-4646 February 7, 1994 ~ ~cGrant Thornton T Mr. Ronda.ll Ps Accountants and Town M eI Management Consultants Town ail 75 , Frontage Road West The U.S. Member Firm of 11~, , Colorado 81657 Grant Thornton International Dear Mr. Phillips: DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Please join us for a presentation on Denver's new international airport by Norm Avery, a Public Affairs Officer at Stapleton International Airport. Building a new airport in the time of long government regulation and short money is a challenge beyond measure. The sheer scope of the new Denver International. Airport makes this project one of the true engirieering/construction feats of our time. He will discuss the history of the project, its ramifications un the local and global air. , transportation system, the impact of the new airport on the not-for-profit business. communify and the redevelopment of Stapleton. A majority of Mr. Avery's entire career has been dedicated to serving not-for-profit entities. For the past seven years, Mr. Avery has served as Public Affairs Officer at Stapleton Airport. He holds a degree in Communication and Business Adininistration from Emporia State University in Kansas, and has taken advanced work in communication at New York University. and Denver University. Before joining Stapleton, Mr. Avery was Senior Public Affairs Officer at the Solar Energy Research Institute in Golden, Colorado. When: Thursday, February 17, 1994 Time: 7t30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Breakfast will be served Non-Smoking Seminar Location: The Ramada Inn - Skyl'ene Room 1475 South Colorado Blvd. Denver, Colorado Pleas:, RSVD by ca?ling Andrea K_apsos at 861-5555 on or before Feb:uary 15th. Remember that our geriodic seminars are at no cost to you, so please come and join us. Very truly yours, ;G1 T THORNTON J. Alge CPA GJA/ms m 'IN WAVE- UNTA " Quarterly publication of the Colorado Department of Transportation=Division of Aeronautics JAN(lARY 1994 COLORADO DISCRETIOIVARI( AVIATIOfV ~ GRi4NT CYCLE REVISED In recent correspondence to airports and aviation, facilities in the State, Colorado Aeronautical Board(CA6) . chairman, Mike Rock cited the limitations imposed by Amendment I, as well as falling revenues from jet fuel sales taxes, as the primary causes for re-scheduling of Colorado Discretionary Aviation Grant (CDAG) hearings from mid-February to early October 1994. Mr. Rock indicated that the delay in the opening of the new Denver International Airport has also brought about tess-than-anticipated increases in jet fuel tax revenues. Additionally, the decline in international crude oil prices from above $20.00 a barrel to under $15.00 are expected to be reflected in future jet fuel sales tax contributions, , which are based. on the cost to the consumer at the pump. . Another vital consideration coloring the CAB's decision to delay the awarding of funds is an attempt to bring the grant cycles into sync with the limited construction season in Colorado. Airport projects not ready for construction by early summer are unlikely to be completed within the season. This leads to an increasing number of incomplete projects which remain from previous CDAG cycles. Some projects nearly two. years old look to the coming summer for completion. , The amended grant award schedule hopes to bring a larger single pool of available resources to the grant hearings, while allowing airports to plan for maximum utilization of funding during limited construction periods. 1994 COLORADO DISCRETIOfVARY AVIATION GRANT SCHEDIJLE'' Applications mailed to sponsors July 11 Applications.deadline August 26 Grant award hearings October 6-7 Governor's review and comment _ November 9 Contracts to awardees November 14 Contracts returned to State January- 13 State processing (CDOT-Acct/i4G) March 3 ' Grantees mailed Notice-to-Proceed March 6 lnspiring views of the Bou/der F/atirons welcomed the Colorado Aeronautical Board to its January 6th meeting held in Jefferson County Airport's new $3.2114, 25, 000 sq. ft. Terminal8uilding. The CAB he/d discussions with regional airport management, Jefferson County Airport Authority, state and federal aviation staff and the flying public. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the CAB is p/anned for March 10 at the Sand Creek Police Station, Co/orado Springs. Following the meeting, the CAB will four the airport termina/ anticipated for comp/etion in October 1994 and fhe newly completed ARFF training facility. - ' Montrose - the Next-ichita7 - . DIRECTOR'S DEN = - Dennis Roberts As you know by now, Burt Rutan has chosen Montrose as his ~ new home for Scaled Composites Aireraft. City a more.'°pro- What a year this has been! A.s I write - business"attitude and better, "quality-of-life" climate in . this, 1993 is drawing to a close. Gen- Colorado than at his existing location in 1VTohave, CA, Rutan erally, we taice this tiine to reflect back, plans to begin engineering and manufacturing in Montrose as and assess the past ,year's activities. Despite. having_a banner soon as the sale of the Mohave location is finalized. . year, sq much is.ahead - I'd rather look forward to 1994 and - - give you a peek of what's coming up! CONGRATULATIONS. TO- NdONT'RO5E and ` VVELCOME BURT RiJTAN! . But first, just a quick glance back. As we noted in the first issue ofMountain Wave - tlie Colorado Division ofAeronautics CqB's Goals Expanded and the Colorado Aeronautical Boazd have established the . state's aviation programs aimed at maintaining and enhancing As a recent meedng, the CAB established its goals and the state's aviation system. objectives for 1994: In addition to continued efforts to ' . administer the Coloiado Aviation Fund in the most efficient DIA - Boom forAviation Statewide ' manner, the CAB began to take a more broad-reaching look at statewide aviation. - This coming year will see continued, growth in aviation on many fronts. We all know about the opening of the new Denver As the last :sfate to have an aeronautical focus, the CAB has - International Airport and while I realize some feel Denver's been faced primarily with the task of catching up. Most of our commercial. activity has limited benefits for the rest of the emphasis has been on getting tiie, state system simply backup state's aviadon community - it is really the life-blood of our to some sort of safe, minimum standard. While much remains . system. to be done in this azea, progress is being made. In 1992, approximately. $10.2M was funnelled to the Colorado with individual grants issued to over 125 aviation sponsors, Aviation Fund from aviation fuel taxes. Denver collected about the CAB is now turning its sights to more statewide issues. 92°/a of this money through fuel sales at Stapleton. They Included aze efforts to enhance all types-of airport-related received 70% back as entitlement refunds. (Denver is not ~~enance, expand the state's network of navigatiori and eligible for discretionary grants.) If my math is conect, that communcation aids, improve safety through pilot education " is a 22% contribution to the rest of the state's aviation aeeds. and better collection and dissemination of aviation weather information, to naine a few. The opening of DIA, in addition-to improving the.efficiency of the nation's aviation system, will increase revenues generated The CAB is committed to responding to the needs and desires for statewide projects - not to mention rnaldng available airfield of the-state's aviation users and providers. _ Plan to play your . equipment from SIA for airports across the state. part in this on-going commitment to Colorado's aviation future by attending a CAB meeUng and making your voice heard. While most of us will only use DIA as passengers - we wili all benefit greatly from its success! Here's hoping your 1994 is a happy, prosperous and safe one - and that all your flights will be CAViJ! Colorado youih;p~cipated u3 the anziual ~R1~T,'I'IO~TAti: : ~ - AVIATIt7N ART CO.N.TEST sponsored 1ay :he NationaI; Assoc~don of State ~,via~on C?~i~~als ~'h~s y~s si~e nner: wiIl be: entered a# t~e national level ;for the hanor represeAtJng our country In tlie I nternataonalj~tdgtng', Age 8 W?tl~am Jaramillo Spaiin Elerrientsry S:chool Puebta r ;Age 10 : Dev~n Cummuigs Wirt Elemenfary Sc1io41 Broomfield ;;Age 15..: Amber; Pteratti: I.:a-Veta HigIa Sch4aoi-La veta N'e: w;sh ou ~ueCX as: ou a~ard ~o the o ` y f ;.Nlll~Qlttdl pFltflQ~ltdOtl. ` ~/iam J. Jarami//o, age 8, of Spann Elementery Schoo% . 1' Pueblo, was State winner in the age catepory under 10 vrs AL~>of Colarada is p~rlli~agfor; ~'((~[l,. . , . The CDOT-Division of Aeronautics staff has grown AERoNAv7'I CS D! Y ISI ON srnce 7ts creation in 1989 to a staff of seven. As part of the newly-formed Colorado Department of STAFF REi4DY FOR 1941 Transportation, each staff inember has particular areas of specialization and responsibility. To provide you, the Division-user, with a better concept of these responsibilities, the following short contact roster has been prepared. Although it is always advisable to, call the Division at (303) 397-3039 if you are uncertain who can best assist you, you are also welcome to dial J~ directly to that person you know is equipped with answers. . ~ The Division Planning Staff consists of three persons: Bob Brown - (303-397-3044) manages contract g~a administration, RFP/RFQs, consultant selection and ` coordination with FAA and CDOT. He is the TQM and CQI team member for the Division. Bob is currently over-seeing preparation for continued ARFF live-burn ac row- cott rown ee, .av;s a;n, „ y arton an o rown. training and the emergency equipment (oan program, Front row - Carolrne Scott,*DennisRoberts andMaureenMilow - for commercial service. airports. Scott Brownlee -(303-397-3045) conducts FAA master . Maureen Milow -(303-397-3046) manages the fuel ' record inspections at 65 statewide general aviation tax reimbursement program, is Division computer guru airports and does design compliance inspections for and schedules ARFF training and certification. She is 14 commercial service facilities in Colorado. Scott the friendly, helpful voice of office administration who oversees airspace evaluations, pavement condition can be called upon for those hard of find fuel tax indexing, wind recording and aviation activity data answers. "Mo" does regular AutoCAD updates for all collection. He is currently coordinating publication of airport design changes and can be found answering the Colorado Aeronautical Chart. phones, placing faxes and making travel arrangements , Travis Vailin -(303-397-3048) works in close association with the FAA Denver Airports District Office. Caroline Scott -(303-397-3043J is grant administrator in establishing and maintaining the 5-year Capital for CDAG activities and the Airport Management Improvement Program (CIP) schedule and National Plan Internship program. She coordinates all CAB activities, for Integrated Airports System (NPIAS) conformation. as well as contributes to Mountain 'Wave. Caroline Travis is Division liaison for preparation of Airport Layout , assumes responsibility. for special projects - and is Plans (ALRs) and is currently developing a program to currently "trailboss" for the Division's relocation to provide statewide aerial photography of airport/heliport larger offices planned to be. completed by May 1, 1994. facilities. He monitors the on-going Aviation Weather , Observation System (AWOS) study. . All aspects of Division activities are under the Andy Garton -(303-397-3047) as staff engineer, directorship of Dennis Roberts. Mr. Roberts acts as provides technical..assistance to airports, including coordinator of Division implementation of CRB policy, prov,iding guidance on CDAG projects and close-outs. Prepares and monitors all budget activities, acts as Andy heads the Division task force supporting the legislative liaison and interfaces with transportaion ~ Stapfeton. Airport Surplus Equipment distribution administrators on local, state and national levels. He program. He is currently writing a series of "standard is immediate past vice-president of the National specs" for commonly accomplished airside projects Association of State Aviation Officials - Northwest which will assist regional airports in planning runway Region. - maintenance and fuel farm initiatives. The Division maan number is (303) 397-3039 - . Fax number is (303) 397 3042. , ROC.KY MOUNTAIN AIR FAIR LOGS _ SUCCESSFUL 'FIRST SOLO' On a crisp, bright weekend in early October, 1993, Teacher recertification seminars were lightly attended, the firsf annual Rocky Mountain Air Fair opened its but well received; expansion is planned for '1994: doors at the Colorado Convention Center. Planned as Federal Aviation Adminisfration Inspector-Ainivorthiness an event to showcas,e aviation, the FAIR was.sponsored (IA) recertification workshops are envisioned after by the Rocky Mountain Aviation and Aerospace Assn., March 1995. a Colorado non-profit corporation wfiose goal is to "promote and further education and public safety in 'The 1994 Rocky Mountain Air Fair is planned for the the aviation industry". weekend of October 8 and 9. Planned site is Denver's Currigan Halt, which provides. street-level exhibition and Major financial support of the Rocky Mountain Air Fair seminar areas,. outdoor marquee for greater visibility,, included ColoracJo Aeronautical Board, Federal Aviation and-easy, flexible exhibitor access. A,dministration, Jeppesen-Sanderson and Continental Airlines.' Organization, development and management At its Annual Meeting in December, the parent were under the capable,heaiiership of. Walt Barbo, a foundation Rocky Mountain Aviation and Aerospace long-time -active voice and proponent of aviation in Assn., affirmed officers; Walt Barbo was re-elected as Colorado. Tasks, from organizational to menial, were President; Barbara. Hobson retained as Vice President: . accomplished exclusively with voluntary participation Mike-Baldwin continued as Treasurer and Carol Leyner which included members of the Colorado Pilots Assn., elected as Secretarv - Colorado Wing-Civil Air Patrol, ColoradoAirport ' Operators Assn., the Ninety-Nines and, Colorado United Airlines, as a principal sponsor of the 1994 FA/R, Division of Aeronautics. is providing office space and telephone facilities in its Flisiht Traininsa Center at Stapleton which will serve as . An estimated 15,000 persons visited the static displays the 1994 FAIR headquarters. , and exhibits, took part in aviation seminars or were ' _ . entertained and inspired by speakers Phil Boyer, FANT~OSY Of"FLfCHT TAK~S lTS a11fINGS: in of United Airtines esid n PA, A 1 Haines, ca ta r f AO e t o p p ill-fat it Y fli ht,- and aviationhumorist an d ed S ioux C 9 lecturer, Rod Machado ~~t~Yo.f~8ht, the cone~pt so success[tf atthe 1g~3 Rocky.: Muiif~r€n~ir.::~'cur h~faken::on additio~i>aimensioiis In.e~'ozts: : A vital aspect of the FA/R was the Fantasy of F/ight -~Y ne`wly;formed ~'antasy af Fii,~hf ~'oundatron The ; _ learning stations designed to give realistic hands-on FaundRflons's:. goxl xs ta xeach greatei` numliexs ufstudent at participation to schooi children in aircraft dynamics, Rh.6 8~ $~de te~uels by;preselrtin~ Ftu?~as~ statevcnde - flight planning, meteorology. And many enthusiastic - ; stucJenfs were able to "take control" of the yoke of Fo~~eniaUve;s1tesin~r~ndJunctlvin,Bue~ta~sta;Sterl~n~ the simulator for a little PIC time. ~d.1~ar iiope #o aitrdct rtearly 11;50b sfiidents rrom local - and ':surrpuriding areas far tliis once in a;lifeUme: ; ' expenenae foc many, `the ficst=ever aRpc?muuty far a little "sfaek, : . 11me" ~s a;pureIX voTuntaYy:orgaiuzaUon,;ih~ ~oundat~on is . . : . . ; so asszstance an assun~sg that . , gernat ' soix citi ng fi nancial and - 1ha programbru~ s av~at~on ta the scboais S onsaxslups are ; ~ P being ~o1~~ited at the state and 1oca1 teveis to :defer the ~o5ts of ; ~ . : ~ ~ , ~ ~ eqwpment, travei ancl fransport expenses * 0 ~ 'AMh' Local v4lunfeers are Welcomed b.y ~he Foundati on to assist as Weather, fhghi plannrng,:s~rnulator - anc~ other learning stafi~on~ T'he program of ten sta~ons can ; rr,~zst~cally be ~ccomplished by a student in apptoximately ~ , . ~ one hour For more xnfqimabon about :Farriasy of Flrght t~r bec~ttung: a.; vvork~ixg volunteez, contact Faunuat~t~n president, ~eff Graves DOT AeronaudesDirector, DennisRoberts, explaixs to visitors the fne at ~303) 84Q-D'T45 or Camtin~ Scott;at CDq'` Aeronautics at ; oints ofCDOTARFF'equi ment.on dis la atRoc MountainAirFair. ~363) 597 .3043 ANNUAL COLORADO AERONAUTICAL TENTATIVE 1994 COLORADO BOARD SCHEDULE ANNOUNCED AERONAUTIC~4L BOARD SCHEDULE ' The seven-person Colorado Aeronautical Board (CAB), which is representative of a!l aspects of State avia#ion January 6 Regular business meeting - interests and regions, places considerable emphasis Jefferson County Airport on its relationship with its constituents in the aviation Btoomfield. CO communit.y Statewide. In keeping with the - encouragement of this relationship, it is the Board's March 10 . Regular business meeting wish to interact with as much of that community as ' Colorado Springs Muncipal Airport possible. , Colorardo Sprinas. CQ One such way to.better understand regional and local.June 9-10 Colorado Airport Operators Assn. . needs is to talk direetly to those needs on site - in the - Telluride. CO communities, at the airports. The 1994 CAB calendar _ encompasses visits to Fiont Range, Eastern Plains and August t 1 Regular business meeting , West S/ope locales, dealing directly with pilot groups, Lamar, CO operators and management. October 6-7 Discretionary Aviation Grant hearings . The CAB charter calls for meetings no less frequently CDOT-Division of Aeronautics than quarterly. However, membership may determine Enalewood, CO needs and can call more frequent sessions.. pecember 8 Regular business meeting The CA6 encourages .community participation and CDOT-Division of Aeronautics welcomes attendance at its meetings. We at- the , Engtewood, CO Division will.be happy to place your name on the mailing list to receive agenda and `minutes for regularly The CAB appreciates your participatron and looks ' scheduled meetings. A note or phone call .to Carolline forward to seeing you during the year at (303-397-3043) will assure you're included. , one of.;ts regional meetings. CANDIDATES FOR CAB EASTERN SLOPE . WESTERN SLOPE AIR SERVICE REPRESENTATION BEING CONSIDERED BY . ~~wED GOVERNOR ~ The Governor's office of Boards and Commissions has In astudynowbeingcompletedbyiJNISONCONSiJLTING, notified the CDOT-Aeronautics Division that it is INC. and fundedjointly by local, state and federal sources, assembling a pool of interested applicants for future Rep-ion 10 League for Economic Assistance and Planning position(s) on the Colorado. Aeronautical Board in Montrose is attempting to develop a marketing strategy to , representing Eas#ern Plains interests. According to attract additional intra-state air service to VVestem Slope CRS 43-1 0-104(2), applicants should reside East of communities. the Continental Divide and represent local ' government(s) which operate airports. The. Governor The study hopes to evaluate existing city pairings to devise will select from a list of nominees supplied by ,Iocal reasonable alternatives which no only utilize tlie expanding _ governments. markets resulting from the opening of Denver International Airport,.but attract potential expansion of intra-state sir service Interested candidates are encouraged to contact the to and froin Western Slope commercial airports. A usable Govemor's Office of Boards and Commissions at (303) product resuldng from the study is expected to be a user- 866-2471 for an application or additional information. friendly computer data-base which can be "personalized" to All applicants must have.an endorsement from the each of the Western Slope airports and which.will -aid these unit's governing body (city, county, etc). Applications; airPorts in attracting n.ew markets and new routes. - along with resume and letter of endorsement should . be sent to Ms. Karen Rokala, Governor's Office-Boards The finished,study is eapected somedme this spring. anb Commissions, 136 State Capitof, Denver. CO 80203-1792. At 9927 MSL, Leadviile, the nation's "highest" airport,recently saw completion of federally-funded runway expansion to 6400 ft. State grant funds provided pavement of a helicopter parking ramp for use by many high-altitude training squadrons, as well as, equipment for installation of a Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) planned for on-line this summer. 1f,~~~`~~ rv~ . ~ Steamboat Springs ski area is now. served by an expanded STOLport ' just west of the community. Continental Express ATR 42 service is made possible by recently completed federally-funded runway devel- r.m~rv _ r- ment expanding the runway to 4000 ft. State.funds will make possible the installation of a VOR-DME transmitter and a Remote Communications Outlet (RCO) providing enhanced communications between Denver Center and aircraft operating out of this unique , mountain airport. ~,LI ' ~ ~ -Federal Aviation Administration has recently commissioned RCO capabili ties in the-area surrounding the.busy skier gateway at Eagle County Re gional Airport serving Vail. Contract air traffic control services'are also ° operational at EGE through mid-April 1994 to assure safe movement of commercial and general aviation aircraft in the mountainous terrain whereweather -is sucha sigfinicant factor. _ BULK RATE CDOT-DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS_ • U.S. POSTAGE • 6848 S. REVERE PARKWAY, SUITE 101 . ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112-6703 PAW PERMIT NO. 738 Denver, CO , Pe99Y Osterfoss ;,t~~"'~iv ~ , J Mayor, Town of Vai l ~Uunw 75 S. Frontage Road ~ Vail, CO 81657 . " REC.E$VED rE3 ~ 7 1994 , y - KC: , i , lG9(~., wt Frederick Ross Cvmpany Worldwide Real Estate Services 730 Seventeenih Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-3512 (303) 892-1111 Telefax: (303) 892-6338 Establish2d 1888 February 14, 1994 Peggy Osterfoss Mayor, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Fax: 1-845-9135 RE: Archdiocese Pazish Site Dear Ms. Osterfoss This is to follow-up on a recent meeting with Bob McLaurin and Monsignor Dentici's contacts to you about the mission of the Archdiocese relative to lower-cost employee housing in the Vail area. This letter is to express the interest by the Catholic Archdiocese in working with you, the Town of Vail and the shareholders in the Berry Creek Fifth Filing to determine the potential for: . • A 10 to 15 acre site for a parish, K-8 school and related facilities and • Evaluating the potential to develop and manage 50 to 70 units of low cost housing. I helieve thut therc is a pote..tial for the r.eeds and interests of Lhe Archdiocese to c;,mplement the public agenda at the Berry Creek Fifth Filing. For example, the Archdiocese could help solve the site's infrastructure and access problems as well as respond to the community's ongoing housing needs. The Archdiocese wants to own, and intends to pay - either in cash or in site improvements, for the parish and school site. Relative to the non-profit housing, in order to achieve the target rent rates, it would be necessary for the land to be donated and to obtain additional development concessions. The Archdiocese would bring its credibility, development and management expertise, and its non-profit financial abilities to the development. There is some urgency at the Archdiocese to pin down their new parish site, and we are considering several possibilities. Therefore, we should move as quickly as possible if there is any potential for a match between the Archdiocese and the Berry Creek parcel. Please let me know if and how I can help. • IR Colorado Springs, Dallas, Houston Los Angeles, Chicago, ioronto. New York, Bosfon, San Diego. San Francisco, Seattle. London, Paris, Frankfurt and 100 other cities Established 1888 Peggy Osterfoss February 14, 1994 Page 2 I am sending a similar letter to Howard Gardner. Please let us know if you have any suggestions, either about Berry Creek or another location. Thanks again and let me know if you have any questions or suggestions. Sincerely, ROSS CO,?~T~ULTIN GROUP / Ar old C. Ray, ~RE Director ACR:sha TOWN OF YAIL 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Manager Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2105 / FAX 303-479-2157 ~ February 2, 1994, Helen S. Fritch President of the Board Vail Alpine Garden Foundation 183 Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Contribution Request Equaling $10,000.00 from 1994 RETT Funds • Dear Helen: In responding to your request for the 1994 contribution funding from the Vail Town Council, I found this money had been designated as a pledge. The Council wishes to clarify in writing the disposition of these funds. Payment shail be broKen into two portions, as follows: ' 1. $5,000.00 shall be tied to the design review process, e.g., the Council recagnizes the substantial cost of design work and will contribute this money up front. 2. The second half of the contribution, $5,000.00, will be tied to the issuance of a building . permit. The Council is extremely supportive of your continuing efforts to beautify the Ford Park area and will look forward to receiving further updates on your schedule for design work and construction as that becomes available to you. . In regard to your agreement with the Town of Vail, the Town Council has agreed that you should have a Lease Agreement rather than a License. They have directed Tom Moorhead to prepare a lease for your consideration. Helen, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincer ly, ` Pamela A. Brandmeyer Assistant to the Town Manager xc: Vail Town Council Bob McLaurin Kristan Pritz Steve Thompson Tom Moorhead ~RECEIVED F E 6 ~~19g4 0 w~. : ~i ?~e~ United States Forest White River Holy Cross Ranger District Department of Service National P.O. Box 190 Agriculture Forest Minturn, Colorado 81645 303-827-5715 Reply to: 1950/2430 Date: February 4, 1994 Town of Vail ' 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Many of you are aware that Congress passed new appeal regulations for decisions - . concerning National Forest lands. These new regulations went into effect on January 3, 1994. I am writing to make sure that each of you are familiar with . the new regulations and some changes we are making to comply with them. As in the past we will continue to send interested partiea scoping letters early in the analysis procesa to determine issues for specific projects. These isauea will help drive the analysis process.. Also comments will be accepted anytime during the analysis process. When a Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft Decision.Notice have been completed, individuals who provided comments during scoping will be notified as well as a legal notice will be published in a local newepaper. This notification will etart a thirty-day comment period with copies of the draft documents available for your review. All comments received during this comment period will be addressed and placed in an Appendix to the Environmental Assessment. At the completion of this step a decision may be made or the proposed action may be modified and a new comment period will be initiated. The signing of the decision document will start a 45-day appeal period. Several changes have been made in the appeal process and when implementation of a decision may occur. If a project receives no expression of interest during the entire analysis process (from scoping to comment period) it may not be appealed and may be implemented immediately when the decision is published in the paper of record. If a project receives an expression of interest but no appeal is filed on the decision within the close of the 45-day appeal period, implementation may occur on, but not before, 5 business days from the close of the period. If an appeal is filed, implementation may occur within 15 days after disposition of the appeal unless the decision is remanded back to the analyais process. In order to appeal a decision, someone must have "standing". Standing is defined by the Forest Service as participation in the project analysis by either submitting a comment during.the comment period or "otherwise" expressing interest in a project at any time prior to elose of the comment period. ~ This new process will increase the time involved to analyze and make a decision. Therefore, the analysis procesa will begin much earlier than in.the past in order that the best possible analysis can be completed and so projects can be implemented in a timely.manner. So with that in mind many of you have received in the past month requests for comments on aeveral propoaed timber salea. Several additional requests will be sent to you in the next several montha. Some of you may interpret these requeats as an increase in the amount of timber sold on the Holy Cross District and White River National Forest based on the number of requests you receive. I want to assure each and everyone of you that this is not the aase. The volume of timber sold on this district and the forest as a whole remains the eame as it has in the past. Some of the requests you will receive wi1T be for timber sales scheduled for 1995, some for 1996, and even some for 1997. But as mentioned before this new process requires longer time periods for the analysis and the decision-making process. This new process is designed to provide more interaction between.you as an interested party and the Forest Service in designing acceptable projects to both. I look forward_to your continued interest and participation in the decision-making process on the Holy Cross Ranger District. If you have nay questions feel free to give me a call. Sincerely; WILLIAM A. WOOD District Ranger Page 2 CML Newsletter-February 4, 1994 ~ C,olorado officials ~-Devavtation of Propositi_on 13 appointed to key The following article is taken from a bors in identical houses who have stayed N LC p osts RICHARD REEVES columrc by Richard put. That figure is predicted w reach 70 Reeves, distributed by Universal Press or 80 times early in the 21st century. Thomton Mayor Margaret Carpenter Syndicate. Reprinted with permission. n More than 90 percent of the home- and Broomfield Mayor Pro Tem All rights reserved. owners who benefited from Prop. 13 are Bob Sakaguchi were recently appointed Mammoth Lakes in the same homes they owned in 1978. to key National League of Cities posi- I was among the people who came Why should they move, when other tax- tions. Carpenter was named chair of here this winter to ski and [o ay to forget payers are being forced to pay their share NLC's Advisory Council. The principal the real world in a white week of down- of the costs of government? assignment of the Advisory Committee hill mind-cleansing. But when I picked this year will be to examine ways to re- up the local paper, the Mammoth Times, ¦ Califomia school funding and duce the crime and violence that endan- the first thing I saw was a long interview achievement have both dropped from gers neighborhoods and communities Wi?h the chairman of the Mono County 1970's rankings in the na[ion's top five to throughout the United States. Supervisors, Andrea Lawrence, who 1990's rankings in the bottom 10. ended the interview by saying: "There is Sakaguchi was reappointed as vice a potential insurrection out there." ¦ More than 40 percent of the prop- 1 Hard to believe while ou are lookin erty-tax relief has not been for homeown- chair of NLC's Transportation and Y g ers a[ all, bu[ has been an annual windfall Communicaiions Committee. This ear at or skiing the Sierra. But Chairman Y Lawrence has a haired, no-nonsense for corporations and landlords. the Committee will be the focal point BTaY- of NLC's involvement in the rapidly look about her that persuades a visitor. ¦ Local governments have tried to sur- changing arena of telecommunications "The obvious (issue) is how we are go- vive by inviting in auto dealerships and and the evolution of an electronic "in- ing to survive as local government. Wal-Mar[s to get a share of state sales formation superhighway."'The Com- You're getting now into whether we can ta,ces on high point-of-purchase volume. mittee will also be working on a vari- fill potholes, build community centers, "Fees" are another way for localities to et of trans ortation issues. put fish in our screams and provide fire y P and olice rotecdon...if we are down to to grab a few loose bucks: in Los An- P P geles County, there is now a$75 charge . They join Denver Councilmember-at- our last dollar, where do you want us to for group picnics in local parks. Large Cathy Reynolds and Fort Collins spend it?" Mayor Ann Azari in key NLC leadership Did I need this? That's the way they ¦Prisons in the state are at 184 per- positions. Reynolds and Azari are mem- talk in Los Angeles, where I was coming cent of capacity, and prisoners are being bers of NLC's Board of Directors. from. I had just finished several weeks of released before serving minimum sen- work for Money magazine trying to evalu- tences to make room for new ones. Denver Mayor Wellington Webb re- ate, in hard numbers, the impact of 1978's o The state's rado of librarians to stu- cently completed a two-year term on Proposition 13 on life in Califomia. dents has reached 1 to 8,512, compared the Board of Directors and now serves Money's editors asked me to do a with a national average of 1 to 820. on the Advisory Council. Through study because I had often deplored the these and other NLC committee assign- victory of the old vs. the young when the ¦ California state colleges have elimi- ments, Colorado continues to make its state voted to freeze property taaces at 1975 nated 6,000 courses in the past three presence felt in NLC acdviries and de- levels for homeowners who stayed put. years. Tuition and fees have been in- liberations. ? These aze some of the numbers we creased by 320 percent above the rate of picked up in trying to chart the decline in inflation since Prop. 13 was passed. California living as revenue collection in- So it goes in the Golden State. It will evitably centralized all government in take a miracle or a tragedy to arrest lhe Sacramento. California decline. The people who own CML ¦ Prop. 13 worked-too well! There the homes of 1978 are now passing their was a reduction of more than $200 billion tax exemptions on to their children-the Published biweekly by the eoioraao modern equivalent of royal land grants. Municipal I,eague for Colorado's in local revenues and, predictably, a de- municipal officials. (USPS 075-590) cline in lhe Perhaps a giant earthquake, massive un- Communications and Reseamh: Kay Mariea services provided by local employment or riots by less-than-royal Research Associate: Janel Helt governments-and the essendal local taxa ers mi ht force a chan e, or at Graphics Services: Tswnya Chandler services are education, health care and P Y g g Printer: Gary Dawson least a reconsideration of what Califomia POSTMASTEI2: Send address chan e form Public safety. g is doing lo itself. 3579 to: Colorado Municipal League, 1660 Li I assume that's what Chauinan ncoln 5t., Suice 2100, Denver, Co 80264. ¦ New homeowners are paying as Pnone: 831-6411. much as 10 to 20 times the taxes of neigh- Lawrence meant when she used [he word iubscripuon rates: $100 par year, nonmembers. IIISUfi'CCCtOR. ? ~C= IGCC.L . . AVEC, ;^A ~v R RESORT ASSOCIATION E, T\AIL1a11~, A ' 3 r2 olume 1 bruary `1994 BU$it1888 t0 BL18i11685 Lnages Elegant flooring and window newcomers at Business After Hours Mixers, help Discourrt Bulletin treatrnents. Avon. 949-5658. to weloome new businesses to the area with a Support your fellow chamber members' Lake Creek Village Apartmeats Affordable ribbon-cutting celebradon, and help to promote businesses! Placing an ad in this section of the housing rentals in Edwards. 9264550. ABCRA functions and membership benefits? newsletter is free, and listed discounts are Stanley Steamer Carpet Cleaning. 845-9512. You'll be rewarded with fame, appreciation, available to ABCRA members only. Don't miss Steve Jones Stables Horse drawn sleigh rides, personal fulf'illment, individual business the chance to advertise your specials in the summer trail rides. 845-7770. promotion opportunides, and lunch on a regular March newsletter. Southwest Untimited Furniture, home basis! Let us tell you more about it- call for all Beaver liquors-10% discount on all purchases accessories, and interior design. Avon. 845- the details on the ABCRA Acnbassador Program, Nova Guides- Offers a 15% discount on 9447. 949-5189. acdvides- year round. Snow mobile season is Vai! Bank Branch banking coming soon to 1~~ Studio One Inc. has expanded into new here! Avon! 476 -4fi00. The Coyote Cafe- $1.00 off all entrees for all Westslope Surplus Store Military surplus and °frices in EagleVail. Fstablished in 1985, Design Studio One Inc is a full service advertising and members of your party. sporting goods. Avon. 949-1985. ~keting design fum. Design Studio One Inc. Overland & Express Tl~avel- provides free offers a comprehensive service including: print parking for their clients at Denver's Stapleton Returning Members advertising, logo design, full scale identiry Airpon, as well as excellent money saving (continued from December & January) development, marketing bcochures, postQts, advice for all vacation or business travel. In the Alpine Management newsletters and complete graphic design ANNEX next to Walmart at 949-1600. Open Chicago Piua scrvices. They invite you to stop by and visit Monday-Saturday year round. Cordillera their new offices. 949-1716. H&W Therapy-10% off for ABCRA Intermountain Insurance members and family for physical therapy and Lodge at Avon Center Info about you and your business wanted: If medical services. Discount for the H&W Mountain Man Nut & Fruit you've had a recent move, expansion, addidon of Therapy fimess club, too! 949-0610. National Printing & Packaging new products or services, employee promodons, Vail-Beaver Creek Reservatlons- can save you Nova Guides etc., please let us know for inclusion in our up to 25% on cruises with 25major world-wide Public Service Company of Colorado monttily newsletter. Kate Collins, 949-5189. cruise lines. Call 845-5737 to book special Vail Sign Corporation B&B Excavating has established a cruise and vacation packages. Vans to Vail comprehensive parmership with Eagle Valley Cassidy's Hole in the Wall-10% discount on • High School. As a participant with the food at lunch, seven days a week; i i:oo,vM- January Visitor Irrtorntation °`Business Education Partnership of Eagle 3:OOPM. ReQlle8t8 County", BBcB provides a mentoring program ' Shrine Mountain Adventure is offering a 15% The total number of information requesu for for studenu to experience on-theyob awareness. discount on Redfeather snowshoes and December 26th through January 31 was: 856 : In reciprocity, Eagle Valley High School is re- acccssories to ABCRA members for the `93-'94 178 phone calls, 665 walk-ins, and 13 written designing their logo. If your business can assist season. Next day delivery to your door from inquiries. with an intemship program, donations of space, East Vail to Edwards! 827-5363. Within Colorado: 22.8% equipment, money, or time, please contact the . Avon Medical Center has new winter hours. Out of state: 66°lo Business Education Paraiership of Eagle County, Monday through Saturday, 8:OOAM-5:OOPM, Out of cauntry: 11.2% at P.O. Box 1384, Edwards, CO 81632. Sundays 12:OOPM-4:OOPM. The acute care Top five states: clinic is located at Vail Mountain Medical in the 1) Colorado Cellular Phone Service now available at a Vail Valley Hospital. Please cali for an 2) Texas , slgnificantly reduced rate! US West Cellular is appointment, at 949-3222. 3) New York, Illinois providing association pricing to ABCRA Beaver Creek West offers a 10% discount on 4) Califomia members. Their lowest monthly service plan is any two night stay through April 17th to 5) Florida available to you. Please call John Kirkuds at ABCRA members and their friends and Top five topics of inquiry: 476-2288. families. 949-4840. 1) Lodging The 4 Eagle Ranch- Enjoy a horsedrawn 2) Relocation . Gitty on up to the 4 Eagle Ranch Yes, they're sleighride dinner or aftemoon sleighride to feed 3) Maps , open in winter, too! A short ride takes you back the ranch animals. 10% discount to ABCRA 4) Brochure 100 years to the peaceful, romantic times of members and their families and out of town 5) Winter Activities cowboys and mountain men...and the only light guests. Call for information and reservations. in the sky is that of the stars! A horsedrawn 926-3372. P.S. !t's not too early to think about EtC@ti'8... sleigh ride and dinner by a cory fue in the end of season parties- we're green early! Gitty Speakers needed for 1994's Valley Business historic Nelson Cabin, with romantic cowboy on up!!! Forum Luncheons: Do you lrnow of songs, make the 4 Eagle Ranch a perfect place to motivationa] or educational speakers in the spend a winter evening with friends and family. New Members region who would like to speak at this year's Recapture the feeling of being azound a fue to Eashnan Of6ce Products Of6ce Products ABCRA luncheons? Please share your ideas talk, sing, and roast marshmallows. Also enjoy Suppfier- they deliver! 476-6542: with us. Call Kate at 949-5189. winter horseback rides and aftemoon sleigh rides Fiist Bank of Eagle County Hlill service • to feed the ranch animals. CaU for information banking in Edwards. 926-4150. ABCRA Ambassadors wanted! The Avon- and reservations. 926-3372. Formby Ford-Mercury Inc. Auto dealership Beaver Creek Resort Association is & service center. Silverthome. 262-9230. implementing a new program. Can you greet , F.',\ 003194`1-4i;S5 Bulk Rate ~ ~~AVEj~C U.S. POSTAGE PAID Avon, CO 81620 ~ x RECVC~ z,_- B 1 4 1994 PermitNo.30 RESORT ASSOCIATION Bob IlCLaL1Y•lI"i ? `7N\I1 Va i 1 Tor~~n l,ounc i 1 Anowhead Minturn Eagle-Vail Fdwards 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail c"4 81e67 I'.,>t Oiii:e R,,x 14i; ~\01). l:010r,i:lo ~l h'i f-:\\ (ii i1y4U.4iti; , 1(VSIDE calendar TH I S ISS U E February 1 Avon-Beaver Creek Town Race Series Beaver Creek Ski Area/Coyote Cafe March Valley Business February 8 Avon-Beaver Creek Town Race Series Beaver Creek Ski Area/Coyote Cafe ` Fo'rum Luncheon to ' Feature Panel Discussion February 16 Business After Hours Mixer at Comfort Inn in Avon on Eagle County Airpor# ? March 11 Eagle Counry Airport: a panel discussion.Valley Business Forum luncheon at ABCRA AittbasSs'dOi'8 the Christie Lodge in Avon. Wanted! ? April 1 Easter Egg Hunt IV@W Avon Post Office Apri! 17 Vail and Beaver Creek Close for the season Proposed , Beaver Creek Resort Concierge Dave Business After F9ours Mixer to American Airlines General Manager of Anderson recently began his position at the Ib@ H@Id 24 AVw'S COfl7f01't IY111 Colorado Springs, Gunnison, and Vail Activities Desk at Beaver Creek. Anderson will Join hosts Avon Liquors, Your Personal Chef operations will be the featured speakers. develop a range of new programs to increase the caterers, and the Comfort Inn staff for this level of guest services in Beaver Creek Reson month's Business After Hours Mixer. Avon AVOI~B@s1V@I' CI'@@k R@SOI't by developing [he Activities Desk into a full Liquors will host a"mini wine tasting", and ASSOC1at1011 B011'`I Of concierge service. Anderson is a member of the Your Personal Chef will be providing hors Directors exclusive Les Clefs d'Or, the prestigious d'oeuvres. Scheduled for Wednesday, February James Thomason (Executive Vice President of intemational concierge society. 16th, from 5:30PM to 7:30PM, the mixer is free FirstBank) President of charge and is open to all ABCRA members Spencer Butts (Director of VailBeaver Creek Help to speed coastruction of the new Avon and potential members. Reservations) Vice President Post Office by sending a letter to the District . Richard Carnes (Owner- Poor Richard's Music Manager of the US Postal Service. If you March Valley Business Forum Store) Treasurer mailed or had packages arrive during the ~llnctieon to Feature Panel Beth Slifer (President- Slifer Designs) Secretary holidays, you know the frustrations of the post DISCL15S1011 o19 W@ COUI'ty Greg Caretto (Owner- Nova Guides) office s[aff due to their inability to efficiendy get A11'p01't John Hazard (Avon Town Council) the mail to their customers. With our Bruce Kendall (Vice President- Cordillera) tremendous population increase in the western Perplexed by what's taking place in the world of Rick MacCutcheon (D'uector of Administration Vail Valley, coupled air travel? With the imminent opening of l at Arrowhead at Vail) , with a quickly growing Please help Denver Intemational Airport, convenient air Brian Nolan (Owner-"Eoyote Cafe) business community, the travel is of primary concem to all of us. The Ernie Chavez (Mintum Town Council- Mayor) post office simply to expedite the ABCRA's March Valley Business Forum will Pegg,y Collins (Director of Sales & Marketing- doesn't have adequate feanue three Eagle County Airport authorities. Comfort Inn) space to service the COItStI'uCt10ri Of In a panel discussion format, they will share ever-increasing demands their game plan to develop the tremendous AvowBeaver Creek Resort ot our commun;ry. the new Avon potential that exists for the Eagle County ASSOC1at1011 S$dff Please help to expedite Airpon. Don Orrell- Special Events Director the conswction of the Post Off1Ce... Kate Collins- Business Services D'uector new Avon Post Office Join us on Friday, March 11, from 12:OOPM to Wendi Buick- lnformation Services Coordinator by writing a letter to: Frank Beebe, District 1:30PM at the Christie Lodge in Avon for lunch Kris Pardee- Bookkeeper Manager Customer Services, United States and discussion. Craig Colby, Vice President and Vi Brown- lnformadon Center Postal Service, 7500 E. 53rd Place, Room 2204, General Manager of the Vail/Beaver Creek Jet Viola Jaramillo- Informadon Center Denver, CO 80266. Center, Bill Tomcich, Vail Associates Contract Patty Haclanan- lnformation Center Air Marketing Coordinator, and Ridge Rarigh, 4IL TOWN O75 South Frontage Road MEDIA ADVISORX Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 February 16, 1994 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn TOV Community Relations 479-2115 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEB. 15 Work Session Briefs --PEC/DRB Interviews Candidates for vacancies on the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and Design Review Board (DRB) were interviewed with final selection announced at the evening meeting. --Memorial Plaque at Stephens Park The council approved a proposal to install a plaque on a bench at Stephens Park in memory of Elizabeth.Burks, the two-year-old who was killed in a car-pedestrian accident on Sept. 11, 1993. The memorial was requested by members of Elizabeth's day care family. The inscription will read: "Fly in the Sky, Like Pan!" Elizabeth A. Burks ° For details, contact Dawn Melendez or Nora Murbach at 479-9500. --Town of Vail Mission, Vision, Goals The discussion was postponed to the evening session. --Trappers Run Also yesterday, the council authorized an independent review of the Trappers Run Environmental Impact Report prepared by the project's developers, and staff comments associated with the report. The review will require three types of consultants: transportation, soils and environmental/land use. The studies will cost between $9,000 and $15,000 collectively, and are expected to be completed within the next 45 days. The Trappers Run project is a 48-acre parcel in the northwestern-most portion of Vail. Gateway Development, Inc., of Englewood, is seeking the town's permission to develop 30 lots on the property, which is zoned hillside residential. Opponents of the project have presented a petition to the Town Council asking the town to purchase the land as open space. For more information on the independent review, contact Russell Forrest in the Community Development Office at 479-2138. (more) TOV/Add 1 Evening Meeting Briefs --Citizen Participation There was no citizen participation. --PEC and DRB Selection The council named Greg Amsden, Robert Armour, Dalton Williams and Jeff Bowen to the Planning and Environmental Commission. Their terms will run through Feb. 1, . 1996. Hans Woldrich and Bob Borne were named to the Design Review Board with terms also extending through Feb. 1, 1996. --Pulis Bridge The council passed a resolution accepting a$253,824 federal grant for replacement of the Pulis bridge located at the entrance to the golf course. The project is an 80-20 match; with the town contributing $76,176. The bridge has been deemed a safety hazard by the Colorado Department of Transportation because of width problems and voluriie of accidents. Construction is expected to occur this spring, and wil( take no longer than 90 days. For more information, contact Public Works Director Larry Grafel at 479-2173. --Town of Vail Mission, Vision, Goals The council began, but did not complete its review of vision-mission-goals. For a copy of the working document, please contact the Community Relations Department at 479-2115. ~ # # # \ ' M~~ ~y TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 16, 1994 Contact: John Gulick, 479-2253 Assistant Fire Chief STUDENT F)REFIGHTERS COMPLETE FIRE ACADEMY WITH HONORS (Vail)--Adam Graham and Brian Combs, Vail student firefighters, were recently graduated from South Metro Fire Academy in Littleton. The program involved 10 weeks of intensive fire suppression training. Combs graduated in the top 10 percent, and Graham was named "outstanding cadet" during the training. The two have since returned to Vail to continue training with the fire department while they pursue permanent paid positions elsewhere. Vail's student firefighter program was created in 1979. It provides free housing and , training while students pursue a fire science degree from Colorado Mountain College. The program accommodates up to 12 students at a time. Each, spend an average of two years with the department. Awaiting list is maintained for future students due to the program's popularity. # # # ~ . TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 16, 1994 Contact: Kristan Pritz, 479-2138 Community Development Director VAIL TOWN COUNEIL FILLS PEC AND DRB SLOTS (Vail)--The Vail Town Council has named six residents to fill vacancies on the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and Design Review Board (DRD). Greg Amsden, Dalton Williams and Jeff Bowen were reappointed to the PEC, while Robert Armour was appointed as a new member. Armour is a local excavator and part-time ski instructor. The council also reappointed. Bob Borne to the DRB, and named Hans Woldrich as a new member. Woldrich is a retired architectural control and design consultant. Duties of the seven-member PEC include review of variances and conditional use permits, subdivisions and rezonings. The four-member DRB, with one alternating PEC representative, reviews new structure designs, remodels, sign requests and landscaping. The new appointees will serve two year terms ending in February 1996. All are voluntary positions. Other applicants included Michele Colburn, PEC; and Susan Bird, Steven Boyd Jr. and Diana Donavan to the DRB. # # # SENT BY-EAGLE COUNTY ; 2-18-94 ~ 15:25 ~ 3033287207i 3034792157;# 1/ 4 , ~ . • . oiricitONY"Yy 981 1994- 14:41 ' CAGLECC3UhliYBlJlLflihlC, CVUNTY J4IANACiFR 500 BIU)AfiWAY (.303) 37,.$-$tip$ ' P.O. SC)7C $SU EACiIF., tC?LORAi.It) 81631-OAi() • PAX; (303) 37,II •7Z07 ' v.'r :ti! : , . EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADtJ MEMORANDUM . 70: All medfa snd interested parties FRaM: JacEc D. Lewis, County Manager QATE: February 18, 1994 - 14:41 '...i. RE: CHARGES TQ AGENDA F R@. C. B ARD QF COIVIMI 1Q Attached is a copy of new agendas far FebruarV 22, 23, 1994. . . :,i..,• if you have any questions please caIl Tom Jenkin$, Office Assistant at 328-8605. Thank you! JDL/tj cC: Board of County Commissioners ;James R. Fritze, County Attorney :-.,1: Allen Sar#in, Finance Directar Sara Fisher, Cierk & Recorder . , ~ Jack Ingstad, Pub?ic Information Officer ( . i : C:1WR'i 11PnGS1FHANCE51NtENtoRANU.AGE SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 2-18-94 ~ 15:26 ; 9033287207- 3034792157;# 2J 4 February 1$, 1994 - '!4:40 EAIiI.E Cc7lOVTY NIJILpING ~ 551 xxOACANAY OFfICE OF TME , : . ~ ~ ~ P.tl Rpx 8511 BOARD DF CCIMMIS51tJNERS kAGLE. COt O1iADO S I 631 (303) 328-$OQ5 • . ` ' °ti`' ~ FAX•({Ui)3,2R•7107 ;'•tit , i ; ~'r.•e,. A P EAGLE COLINTYi 4OLVR/1VV AGENDA BOARD OF CC1UNTY COMrVtlSSItJ1VERS , REGULAR "IVIEET(NG DAY FEBRUARY -22, 1994 4lF ~ 9F f ii3IF ~!P !F 1E ~E ~ 9E ~F it- iF' 1F. , ~i' i i1 iF tF i i1F Y IF ~F 9P IF 1E iE ~E 10:40 - FUNERAL SER'VICTS FOR ORMER EAGLE COIJIVTY LDSf~wrahGlanwaodSpiinps COMMISSIDNER dALE URA1117 01:30 - 02:30 APPRUVAL OF CDNCESSION STAND AND RESTR(7OMS, EepleCwmtyRoom PEa LEASE AGREEAfIE~VT B~TWEEN EAGLE COUlVTY, STATE OF COLORApp AND WESTERN EAGLL COUNTY METROPOLlTA111 :1RECfiEqTlON D15TRICT Bil! Heicher, iIVECMRD AGTION: Consider approval. 02:30 - 02:45 CONSENT CALENDAR Eeub Caunty Room Ir~m of ¦ rola6~p aM ~-sorWOrprvia) nativ* are plecad on SM eanewK eeien~ier w dlow eM Oo,pd of Camty Gammieafoners to opmx) Ite time mrcl rnmpp on mme ImporWnc t[emn on 4 IwipQw epmda. Nty Comml9eloner IHaY toqumt lhat an itmn ba •RFMOVED• irvm thp C4rnnt celpnder alttl Cateideiad sePnFzdely. My memhee ol ih6 puBliC mby •REdUE3T' My Itah he 'REFAOl7ED• hun the Cormenl Aperyla. ~ 1. BILL PAYiNG Linda Pankuch, Accounttng ~ Mark Silverthorn, Cuntroller ACTtQN: Approval subjeCt to review by the County Manager. CAWP67%D0CSIFEBR22.AGE ' ' SENT BY-EAGLE COUNTY ; 2-18-94 ; 15,26 ; 3083287207- 3034792157;# 3/ 4 2. RIGHT-CIF-WAY EASEMENT POR THE OVERHEAd PRlMARY ELEC7'RIC LINE RELOCA7'lON WEST QF FAIRGROUNDS John Althoff, Englneering AGTION: Gonsider apprnvai. 02:45 - 03:00 A. RESOLUTIpN AUTHl7RIZING Fl1l.L RELEASE QE Eftldc-ft.R~ COLLATERAL FOR GIL L.YIUD WAREMOUSE, CAL aEVELCJPMENT Mary Jo Ber6na#o, beputy County Attorney ACTION: Consider approval. B. RESO1.UTlUIV COIVCERNI{VO APp01lVTMENTS TO THE EAGLE COUN7Y FAIRBOARD Jack p.-Le~'ris, Caunty Manager ACTION: Consider approval. 03:40 - 04:30 NOTICE C3F APPEAL OF COMMUNITY DIEVELpPMENT'S EMIG cot"YP~M DECtSION FROIwI ,lANUARY 70, 9994 HEARlNG BY EBY CREEK MESA LIMITED PARTNER$MIP AS pEVELOPER DF EBY CREEK:MESA`SUBDNISfON Mary Jp Berenato, Deputy County Attorney ACTIUN: Consider approval.' 04:30 - 04:45 l14U4R LIdENSE,HEARING Emon Ccumv~om IVEW HOTEL & RES7'AURAIVT - FABULOUS FQQp, INC. dbe BLUE CREEK GRll.l ~ 11llary Jo Berenata, Deputy CauntyAttorney ACTIpN: Gansider approval, ; 04:45 - 05:00 OPEN MEEf'ING Eactle CautiN Rovm . . ! , • i THE HEXT MEE71N0 4F THE EAGLE COUNTY, CONYIWISSIpNEAS YUILL BE HEL6 GN KEBftUAfiY 29, 1884 7H18 A9Q9DA13 RRDVIDGD FON INFC7HMA'Y14NAL PURPOSES 4NLY - ALL 71M69/WE APPAOXIMATE. THE 6OARD WHILE IN 6E6SION Mqy ppN91DER OTHEfi IT9N9 THAT ARE BROUdF1T BEPOft£ IT. 0AvVp611h0c8XFeeR22mGe „ ° SENT SY-EAGLE COUNTY ; 2-18-94 ; 15:27 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 4t 4 ' ••c:': "A~"`•:i~;,;. February 18, 1994 - 1 4:41 ` ' . kAGLC COLWIY 6WLDING ' 551 BRDAI)WAY OFFICE ~JF THE P,C1. BOX 850 NOARD Or Gt7MM1551pNER5 EAGI E. CQLOfU1DC? 8163 i (303) 328•8605 ~~:ti•+N -fA%: (303) 376=7107 ~4' , 4.: } ':'i~ •'.F'~~ M1~~~, i EAGLE CQUNTIr`, COLORADCy . AGENDA BOaRD' oF Caurv-rY COMnnISsroNERS _.__.._...r... REGULAkVEETING DAY , FEBRUARY -23, 1994 . t ii 8 i # t i!M IF iF 9P iF ]E 4F 9k jE 9k #F 1E iF _ 8, iF d6 i i 8 i # • !E 4 +1F aF dF dF IF iF IF 'o 'i O:QO - 'I7:30 WORK SESSION 4WEEKLY IIPDATE Mtof thsHnlyCVaekRoom Jack D. Lewis, County Manager 71:30 - 91:45 BREAK 9 7:45 - 12:45 WORIt SESSION -:`pENDIN[3 LITlCiATION Mt of U,eNely Crqqy pqpm Jame's_. R; _ Fritze, County Attorney 01:00 - PERFDRMAIUCE EVALUATICIN TRAENIRIG PROGRQlIII fooe,o4owdr Caene Drumm. ~ THE ND(T MEETWO DF7µEEppLE COUN COMMISMN61S WILL BE HELb aW FERRUARY 28, 1884 THiBAfiNVbA IS PROVIDED FOR INFO ONAL PUIWOSES GNLY ALL 71ME,S ARE MPHD%ONATE T116 HoAxh wHU F iN aFFw0N MAY C4N6IDEfi OTI IER ITEM$ TFtAT AkE aRauoryT 9EF9RE IT. a:%lFEeR23.ncF ' z . ' • . • • ~ • ~ ATTACHl`1ENT # 1 Mu ii TOJff OF V~IL ~ 75 South Fronta,ne Road _ Departirrent of Connnulnity Development Vai1,.Colorado 81657 • 303-479-21381479-2139 ~ FAX 303-479-2452 January 12, 1994 Mr. Gary Arthur, President Gateway Development, Inc. 2303 East Dartmouth Avenue Englewood, CO 801 10 RE: Preliminary review of amended Trappers Run Subdivision appiication Dear Gary: Thank you for your most recent amended Trappers Run preliminary subdivision application. The Town of Vail Development Review Team has completed our initiai review and have determined that your application is incomplete. In order for the planning staff to adequately review the impacts of your proposed major subdivision, we request that you _ respond to the foifowing list of questions and comments. This letter identifies the lack of response, or inadequate response, to the questions and comments raised in our previous letter dated October 25, 1993 as weil as, requests additional information necessary to review the amendments you have made to the subdivision since our last review. This letter should not be construed to be a complete list of all staff comments related to the project, but rather an identification of additional information necessary for staff to adequately review your proposed preliminary subdivision application. . - Attached to this letter are additionai review comments made by the Town of Vail Public Works Department, Fire Department and Environmentai Health Department. We request that you review and respond to each of the comments listed in these attachments. Staff would recommend that you pay speciaf attention to completing your Environmental Impact Report which currently does not contain information and analysis, in sufficient , detail to enabfe the staff and Pianning and Environmental Commission (PEC) to assess the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Deficiencies in the EIR or base data are indicated in bold in order to differentiate them from other comments. 1. Perhaps the most significant deficiency of your application is the fact that your Environmental Impact Report does not adequately address alternatives. 1 ~ • Various development atternatives must be evaluated throughout the Environrrientai Impact Report which ultimately pravide a justification to y praceed with the preferred alternative. An "a(ternative" section must be ' added to yaur EIR which exp(ores, in d::tail, thP impacts of alternative road ~ alignments to and within the subdivision, as well as different development scenarios with regard to the number of the lots. • 2. Another concern with yaur Environmental Impact Report is that it appears that each of the studies prepared by your consu(tants were done independently of each other and not cross-referenced throughout the documc:nt. Many of the consu(tants do not appear to be aware of the identified impacts, conclusions and suggested mitigatian measures contained . in the other sections.of the report. An example of this would include the fact that it is suggested that a substantial portion of the property be dewatered through grading and piping yet possible impacts of this procedure are not discussed in any other section of the report. Please provide a statement from each consultant in their section which indicates that they. have reviewed the entire Environmental Impact Report and are aware of the effects af the proposed p~oject as a whole. Cross-references identifying the impacts of suggested mitigation in other sections af the report should be made wherever applicable. For examp(e, it would be appropriate for the consultant doing the vegetation analysis to discuss impacts associated with the proposed dewatering of the fandslide area. 3. As mentioned in the October 25, 1993 letter, it is necessary to provide a ' page numbering system throughout the document to allow reference to . specific sections. Please number all pages in the Environmental fmPact , . Report. 4. Staff has serious reservations concerning your decision to prohibit caretaker units within the Trappers Run Subdivision. The Town encourages the provision of affordable housing whenever and wherever possible. Your . proposed deletion of caretaker units in the subdivision would permanently preclude the opportunity for future lot owners to provide reasonably sized, - . . affordable housing units to employees in the Vail Valley. If your decision to propose the deletion of all caretaker units in Trappers Run is prompted by your desire to reduce traffic impacts on Cortina Lane, staff would suggest that you accomplish this by reducing your proposed number of lots rather than the deletion of caretaker units. 5. At the November 8, 1993 PEC worksession, all seven PEC members expressed concerns with the number of lots in your proposed project and associated environmental impacts on the Trappers Run property. Each of the members suggested a significant reduction in the number of lots you were proposing on the property (30). It is staff's opinion that your proposal to eliminate the provision of caretaker units on each of the thirty lots, does not address the PEC's concerns since the road, retaining wall, and building construction impacts are virtually unchanged. The most appropriate way to . 2 } i. . i i , address the PEC's concerns regarding density reduction is not through the deletion of caretaker units but through a reduction in number of lots being : proposed on this property, in order to decrease environmental impacts. 6. Staff recommends that the two plat restrictions you are proposing to place : on the final plat he amended to eliminate plat restriction #2 and to amend plat restriction #1 as follows: 1. The development of all lots within Trappers Run Subdivision shall comply with Section 18.69.050 of the Vail Municipal Code except that the maximum GRFA ailowed on each lot shall be 4,781 square feet, however an additional 425 square feet of GRFA shall be allowed if a caretaker unit is constructed. 7. As you are aware, the minimum lot area within the Hil(side Residentiaf zone district is 21,780 square feet of contiguaus buildab(e area. It does not appear that all of the lots in this subdivision meet the minimum contiguous buildable area requirement. Please amend the Land Use Summary on the Preliminary Plot Plan (sheet 2 of 9) to list the maximum contiguous buildab(e , area of each of the proposed lots. This chart must be certified by a licensed surveyor. 8. As suggested by the PEC, staff, and the general public at the August 9, 1993 and November 8, 1993 worksessions, as well as in my letter to you . dated October 25, 1993, the provision of useable open space within the . subdivision is very important. Although you show five open space tracts within this subdivision, staff believes that for various reasons (steep slopes, lack of adequate access, etc.), these open space tracts are not in fact useable to any great degree. by residents of the subdivision, their guests, or the general public. 9. As previously requested and assuming you are still proposing building envelopes, yaur preliminary plot p(an must be amended to show actual _ building envelopes. No building envelope may be located closer than 20 feet • from the lots front property line nor 15 feet from any other property line. Please amend your design guidelines to state that all portions of proposed structures must be located within building envelopes and delete the section in your design guidelines which states that 80% of propased building footprints shall be located within a 45 foot radius of a building envelope's center point. The building envelopes must be staked on site for staff to . review. This information will also allow you to provide estimated driveway grades for the lots. 10. It appears that the BLM (now USFS) road easement across Lot 16 is not in the actual location of the existing dirt road which extends from the end of Cortina Lane to the west. Staff requests that you amend your Preliminary Plot Plan to provide a new public access easement in the actual location of 3 • . ~ . 3 the existing dirt road. - 11. As requested on Page 1 of the October 25, 1993 fetfer, please provide detailed information of the proposed 150,000 gallon water storage tank. As ; current(y drawn an the Preliminary Utility Plan (sheet 4 of 5), your proposed water tan{c is too wide to fiit within the 24 foot wide access ancl vsrater easement focated along the nortilern portion of Lot 27. Please pravide a letter from Upper Eagle Val(ey Consolidated Water and Sanitation Districts stating that they have reviewed and approved your preliminary utility ptan. 12. The water resources section of your Environmenta! Impact Report states that a copy ot the hydrologic ana(ysis and the detailed drainage plan has been included. However, we have not received a copy of these documents. . P{ease provide a detailed drainage plan, hydraulic analysis and details related . to al( proposed sediment ponds referred to in your Environmental Impact Report. 13. P(ease provide Michael Claffey's (Army Corps of Engineers) written response to Loren Hettinger's request for a decision regarding the Corps' need for a 404 permit related to the proposed subdivision plans. This letter should include evidence that Mr. Claffey has been provided with and has reviewed a copy of the construction drawings related to the project. 14. Please provide detailed drawings of the three storm filtration tanks as well as the three bridges being proposed. Your Slope and Site Disturbance Plan does not appear to accurate(y reflect the amount of site disturbance associated with the installation of the three bridges or the water tank.- 15. P(ease describe to whom the 24 foot wide access and water easement along the northern property line of Lot 27 will be dedicated on the final plat. 16. Your preliminary utility plan shows a number of storm water inlets which appear to dump storm water directly onto individual lots, and not within platted drainage easements. Please explain this situation. In addition, the . storm drains crossing Lots 22 and 28 would also appear to direct storm water onto US Forest Service and Colorado Department of Transportation. property. Staff would discourage you from depositing storm water from Trappers Road onto adjacent properties. 17. Your consulting engineering geologist suggests that buildings, roads and other structural features may be built within the identified landslide area on . the property and suggests that the hazard will be reduced 6y restabilizing the landslide with appropriate grading, piping and dewatering. Please provide construction details as to how the grading, piping and dewatering of the area will be accomplished. It is likely that the proposed dewatering of a large section of the Trappers Run property will have an effect on surrounding vegetation. The impact of the proposed dewatering plan must be addressed in the vegetation section of your environmental impact report as we(I as any 4 othcr section which may be impacted by the proposed dewatering plan. 18. Rather than providing detaifs of typica( road cross sections at various points throughout the subdivision, staff needs to review actuai cross sections of the road at all locations where one or more tiers of retaining walls are located. The specific design and engineering, materials and associ3ted fandscaping for the retaining walls musfi be specified. Additionally, pleasp amend your plan to show retaining walls with a different symbol. Currentiy, the solid line retaining wall symbol matches the property line symbol and are difficult to easily differentiate. AI( proposed retaining walt locations on the Trappers Run property must be staked on-site for staff review. 19. The disturbance associated with the 20 foot sewer line easement which runs between Lots 3 and 4 and then heads east down the existing drainage way to connect to Arosa Drive is not acceptable. As mentioned on previous occasions, all utility lines within the subdivision should remain within the proposed road right-of-way. 20. As mentioned previous4y, the Town does require the undergrounding of overhead power lines whenever a property is developed or redeveloped. Staff will be discussing the feasibility of undergrounding the overhead power line located on Tract E with Holy Cross Electric and may require you to place money in escrow at the t'ime of final plat to cover this cost or require that you complete this work as a part of your construction of the subdivision improvements. • 21. Staff feels that'the Trappers Circle intersection with Trappers Road is located too close to the existing drainage way and requests that the connection with Trappers Road be moved further to the south. 22. Please explain the purpose of the 30 foot wide access easements across the southern portion of Lots 29 and 30 and the 50 foot access easement located on Lot 1. What is the maximum grade of the driveway leading to lot 1? Staff believes that the environmental impacts associated with the construc- . tion of bridges and long winding driveways to access the building envelopes on Lots 1, 29, and 30, are not acceptable. Staff would recommend that these {ats be defeted as building sites. 23. On Page 5 of the traffic'report it is stated that this study does not attempt to estimate construction generated traffic since this traffic is temporary and the impact is generally less than the traffic impact of the permanent land use. Staff disagrees with this statement and feels that construction generated traffic, both within the Trappers Run property and the streets leading up to • it, must be taken into consideration when determining traffic impacts on the West Vail street system. In Table 2 on Page 8 of the traffic study, there is reference to peak hour level of service a/a and blb. Although I am sure this reference has meaning to a traffic consultant, please keep in mind that this Environmental Impact Report is being reviewed by the Vail Planning and 5 :3 . , . . :i • :i . Environmental Commission, and Vail citizens, who do not have the background in traffic engineering necessary to decipher such references. Please amend the docurnent to axplain this and any other references which . i will not be clear to a lay person reading the document. 24. Please describe, in detail, the impacts on adjacent properties associated with your proposed Cortina Lane improvements. 25. Your conceptual constructiori staging/phasing plan.must be amended to • include considerably more detail. Employee and constructian vehicle parking areas, construction material storage areas and the sequencing of construction and revegetation are all important e(ements ofi the phasing plan. Please provide a more complete construction staging/phasing plan. 26. Your conceptual revegetation plan must be amended to include considerably more detail. Your plan must include specific numbers of each specie af plant to be planted in the areas shown. Additionally, the revegetation plan must include narrative describing the timing of the proposed revegetation throughout the construction of the subdivision improvements. 27. Your design guidetines are incomplete, in staff's opinion, considering the size and potential impacts of this proposed development. Staff would recommend that you obtain a copy of the recently approved Spraddle Creek Subdivision Design Guidelines. This document is a good example of design guidelines prepared for a subdivision similar to the proposed Trappers Run Subdivision. Other specific comments related to the design guidelines are as follows: - a. On Page 1, third paragraph - The phrase "quality oriented" is rather subjective. Staff would suggest that this be removed. Also in paragraph three, it is stated that only landscape architects experienced in mountain design shall be allowed to design the landscaping in Trappers Run. Staff recommends . that you amend the sentence to state that experience in . mountain design applies to architects as well as landscape architects. b. On Page 2, grading - Please amend the last sentence to prohibit grading beyond building envelope lines, unless it is for landscaping purposes. Utifities - first sentence, change the word "will" to "shall". In the last sentence of the first para- ~ graph state that landscaping around meters is required rather ' than encouraged. Please add a sentence which encourages . meters to be located on the structure rather than independently sited. Driveways - for the sake of consistency throughout town, staff would recommend that the wording in this section be changed to comply with the requirements enforced through- out the Town as a whole. Please add a paragraph to this 6 ~ . ; ~ section which de ;cribes the fact that on steep slopes, garages are encouraged to be Iocated as ciase to the raad as possibie, thereby eliminating long winding driveways. ~ . . , c. On Page 4, building height -P(ease expand on the comment regarding individual lot restrictions. 5taff believes that limiting : 6uilding heights on certain lots is a good idea and necessary to reduce visual impacis on certain lots in the subdivision. This area should be expanded to d?tErmine maxirnum building height lirnitations on each lot in the subdivision. Foundations - Please amend this wording to require that ail foundations be designed by a professional engineer only. Exterior Walls - Please amend the last sentence in the first paragraph to say that only the following materials shall be used for exterior , walls. d. On Page 5, swimming pools and tennis courts - Please amend this sentence to state that outdoor hot tubs must be located within building envelopes. Staff would suggest that a new paragraph be added which offers general design suggestions ~ for properly siting buildings on steep slopes as well as proper design and construction techniques in mountain communities. . e. On Rage 6, object - Please amend the last sentence which states that there shafl be little or no fandscaping in undisturbed areas. While areas outside of building envelopes should remain . undisturbed, it is possible that it will be necessary to plant additional vegetation directly outside of building envelopes in order to screen or enhance the appearance of structures that are constructed within the building envelope. Landscaping within the building envelope - Please remove the sentence . regarding an allowance for manicured blueyrass areas. f. As requested in our letter dated October 25, 1993, please : amend your design guidelines to include your proposed prohibition of woodburning fireplaces and stoves within the Trappers Run Subdivision. g. As requested in our letter dated October 25, 1993, pfease amend your design guidelines to include the addition of guidelines on energy and water conservation. 28. Please provide the larger scale photos of each of the simulated views as requested in our previous letter. Also as requested previously, please provide new photos of simulated views 1 and 2 with houses keyed to the lots. These views must also be amended to reflect the current layout of the subdivision. We are again asking that you provide the simulated views on Davos Trail and Arosa Drive as requested original(y and again in our letter 7 y • , ' ~ associated with the p: oposed br;dges and driveways leading to Iots 1, 29 and 30, as weil as the Trappers Road Bridge. Pleass provide simu(ated views of all three of these areas. Additionalty, please reference the Town . Engineers letter regarding a new view from I-70. Staff 6elieves fhat the proposed houses on lots 20 and 21 should be indicated in simulated view number four. Also, the bridge and driveway (eading to the proposed house on lot 29 is missing. Please remove the evergreen trees in tract D as wel( as those added behind the proposed , building on lot 29, from the bridge west. As you know, a worksession with the Planning and Environmental Commission has been scheduled for Monday, January 24, 1994. The purpose of the worksession is to familiarize the PEC with the amendments you have made to your preliminary plan since their last revietiv on November 8, 1993, and to allow them to make a formal determination regarding the completeness of your environmental impact report. Future scheduling of the Trappers Run preliminary plan will be determined at such time as you have made your application complete. The staff will require 30 days to review the completed submittal. If you should have any questions or comments concerning the information in this letter, please feel free to contact me directly at 479-2138. If necessary, the staff will be - available to go over these comments with you and your consultant team. Sincerely, Jim Curnutte Town Planner cc: Kristan Pritz Russ Forrest Mike Mollica Randy Stouder Dick Duran Mike McGee Larry Grafel Todd Oppenheimer Terri Martinez Bob McLaurin Tom Moorhead 8 ~ 1 . • . ~ . 5 ' \ TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Departanenf of Ptcblic Id,'orks/Transpa7-tation Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21581FAX 303-479-2166 MEMORANDUM T0: Jim Curnutte FROM: Greg Ha11 DATE: January 7, 1994 RE: Review of Trappers Run Submittal of December 22, 1-993 I was concerned the Trappers Run developer took the Town's review of the Gpplication for completeness and assumed these WeY'2 tre review comments for their submittal. The following items asked for in my memo dated November 2, 1993 were not submitted with this application: 1) Detailed traffic calculations for West Vail 4-Way. 2) Copy of hydraulic report with back up calculations. 3) Alternative analysis of retaining wall types. 4) Debris flow calculations. I have the following comments on the environmental impact report: Economic and Fiscal Impact Analvsis 1) The site is located in the northwest corner of the Town oT Vail and not the northeast as stated. 2) Town of Vail revenue generation and impact assumptions. a. Retail sales tax -$1000/unit equates to $25,000 being spent/year on taxable goods.within the Town of Vail limits. This appears a little high. The hotel staying guests contribution to sales tax is much greater than the single family homeowner. . . ; ; Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 ; January 6, 1994 ` . Page 2 b. Ski Lift Ticket Tax -.The sales tax is 4% not 2%. The report assumes 70 days/5 persons per unit skiing. This is more than 50%,of ttae ski season the units' guests are skiing. With 5 out oi 5.5 persons/unit average skiing. VA statistics show less than 500 oi total guests to Vail ski and that they only ski 4 days out of a 7 day stay. If one were to buy a community pass for $875. You need only need to ski 20 times to pay for the pass. This section needs more work. If we use VA numbers or we have many more people occupying the subdivision for a lot longer time. c. Transportation Center Receipts - this calculates to using the structure 19 days of full price full day parking or 37 days of coupon full day parking or 150 hours of hourly . parking. These numbers do not coincide with the proposed skiing numbers. It also doesn't allow much time to spend the $25,000 to arrive at the sales tax numbers. Since parking revenues pay for parking operations maybe both these figures should be removed from consideration. d.. Real Estate Transfer Tax Calculations - there appears to be $30,000 to much in year 4 for lot sales. This needs to be adjusted. The $16, 000 total for years 5- 15 needs to be stated as a yearly cost not a total as the first four row's of costs are shown. e. Revenue Generation Summary - should be revised to reflect the true cost of and Real Estate Transfer Taxes lift ticket taxes based on known data with Vail Associates and Town of Vail. It would appear sales tax maybe up to $400 to high and ski lift ticket is $90 to high when reductions are seen and higher rate applied. RETT is $66 . to high. The total would be more likely $3071 versus $3627 as shown. Town of Vail Service Expenditures and Impact Assumptions It is rather peculiar, these consultants did not question any Town staff on how their current budgets are broken down and how this development might influence their cost to provide the necessary services to th'e development. 1) The 1992 annual revenues and current revenues per unit should read expenditures instead. Why was 1992 used versus 1993 or 1994 budgeted? - understates current costs. ~ . i . • . j 3 = Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 . ' January 6, 1994 Page 3 . i ; 2) Debt service assumes costs are influenced by growt.h. This is ' true, however, the debt service is paying off capital projects which were influenced by growth, so I believe they need their share costed. ' 3) Public Works - a. The Town's street maintenance budget is not related to new or old streets. Al1 costs associated with increased > effort for older street is in the street capital budget. Due to the remoteness of this project our average of : $25,000/mile is more than adequate. . b. Snow removal - the Town's current snow removal operations are maxed out. The West Vail route is completely taxed by the time we reach the end of the route being Vail Ridge. To take on the additional mile of north facing steep curvilinear roads will require the addition of two operators to cover the streets 7 days a week from 7:00 am - 12:00 am. It will also require the purchase of one additional plow. The current town.shop complex does not have the room to store this additional plow. In addition, the effort required to increase th2 maintenance of the one mile of existing ro.ad network now functioning at a higher level of importance should be considered. The report does not consider the increased maintenance needed to correct any problems on the existing one mile road due to heavy construction traffic loads. The cost to the Town for snow removal for the one mile is: 2 Operators for 25 weeks .(25 X.40 X 2= 2000 hrs @$15 X 1.33) assume 40% is to the development = $ 15,600 . Overtime/operator time = 100 hrs . (100 X 2 X 1.5 X 15) assume 40% to development $ , 1, 800 Plow operating costs (260 hrs X$46/hrs) _ $ 11,960 Unimog/plow/sander costs . ($115,000 New -$15,000 Trade in/12 yrs) 400 $ 3.333 Shop Storage (15''X 30' X$125/SF/25 yrs) X 400 900 ~.,Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 4 Sanding/Cinders = $ 2,000 Deicer Chemicals = $ 200 TOTAL $ 31,793/mile or $ 1,193/unit Per mile costs understate impacts as certain areas cause substantial investments to maintain. . c. Building Maintenance - this cost includes street lighting and street signs. d. Other - this cost includes engineering who perform subdivision submittals review, subdivision engineered plan review, roadway construction inspection and review . of all new home construction. e. Parks - the.West Vail/Vail Ridge neighborhood has been identified as a neighborhood completely lacking an adequate neighborhood par}c system. This development will only worsen the situation. f. RETT - capital costs not considered. - These will be affected due to requirement to construct new neighborhood park and trail enhancements. g. Street capital Is used to correct problems, however, this dollar amount is only our preventative maintenance costs. The Town did not budget for a major street repair during 1992. Annualized cost to maintain streets: Roadway Capital Costs/1994 dollar8:/1 mile road: Crackseal every year $ 800 Slurry seal-years 4,8,18 $ 23,500/seal 1V2 inch asphalt overlay year 14 $ 80,000/overlay Major rebuild year 24 $ 520,000/Construction period Spot ove.rlays, pothole patching years 1_0-14/20-24 $ 2,000/year , ' • i . i Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 5 Total cost years 1-14 $ 148,000 =$10,585/mi/yr Yearly costs 14 = $353/unit Total cost years 1-25 $ 709,000 =$29,571/mi/yr 24 = $986/unit 4) Transportation - the report states no expansiori, largely fixed costs. All Town of Vail routes are at capacity at peak times ' and for 1994 have added additional service. The Town has been looking at providing bigger buses which is a major capital investment to meet demand. The replacement of existing buses comes from the Town's capital budget, which in 1992 there were not any funded. The Town has also looked at providing smaller feeder routes to those areas who are far from the existing stops. Trapper's. Run homes which average '1112 miles to the nearest stop would be prime candidates for the feeder route. In the parking section it is stated most residents will use the bus system. 5) Parking - states residents will likely use public transit. The nearest bus stop is over 1 mile away and from the farthest home 2 miles away. It is highly unlikely these residents will walk those streets carrying skis for 12/2 - 2 miles. The operation of the parking structure is covered by its revenues. The bigger issue is the capital construction of spaces. Since these residents will need spaces at Vail's structures during peak times it maybe assumed additional spaces may need to be built. The capital cost of spaces is: Initial Construction $ 15,000 Annual Capital/year $ 90 Major Renovation year 15. $ 500. Total Annual costs./ space of 25 years $ 710/unit Number of spaces needed for growth $710/unit - dollars do not overstate costs. 6) Fire - It is most li.kely this subdivision will require the construction of a West Vail Fire Station especially with the access 1 mile through the existing neighborhood versus the . quicker 1/4 mile straight shot from North Frontage Road. The new fire station costs for capital and additional operation do not overstate costs. Obtain numbers from fire department. Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 6 The summary states that taking the average costs overstate tYie true costs and the marginal costs would be more accurate. It appears the marginal costs are more accurate, but may not necessarily be more conservative. The analyst never worked with staff on actual costs and how they are broken out, or what is the long term costs, instead we have a snapshot.of how the 1992 budget and revenues are divided. Traffic Impact Study , The twotraffic impact studies are quite different. The first states tnree roadway connections were considered and the Cortina Lane access was determined to be the less desirable. It results in site generated traffic using existing residential streets; approximately 50 homes would be impacted by increases in local traffic. The existing road network contains excessive grades, poor sight distarice and narrow cross sections. The second report states the Cortina Lane access is the preferred alternative. Approximately 40 homes will be impacted by increases in local traffic. The extension of the North Frontage Road results in ' excessive grades to be constructed in the development. . The second report determines which access is best based on least ~ environmental impacts, and visibility. The traffic engineer does not use criteria such as safest, least traffic impacts, . encouragement of transit use, impact to pedestrians and bicycle users, and school children access to bus stops. It will definitely need to be known how homes, and traffic impacts , . were determined. Many of the Structures along the route have more than one dwelling unit. Impacts of increased traffic affects all ; who use the roadways. This is much more thari just those who abut the route. The Town's bus stops and the school bus stops are at North Frontage Road/Chamonix Road and Chamonix Road behind the Vail Inn. The neighborhood is in close proximity to the West Vail commercial areas. The Davos Trail is popular in both summer and winter. These generate a significant amount of pedestrian traffic along the neighborhood roadways. There is no pedestrian facilities along the route. ; i The popularity of the Davos Trail generates a great deal of bicycle ? traffic from April tlirough October. Again no facilities exist ! through the neighborhood. - i The change from 50 homes to 40 homes. from one report to the next is disturbing. How were less impacted the second time? , ' i Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 ' P age 7 ~The ability to say a grade of 8.8oon a straight of way is excessive to a grade in excess of 120 on a tight curve is ok seems odd. The fact of making 2 90° turns on grades in excess of 10 0 then able to continue up a winding grade in excess of 12% on a 20' wide roadway is not good traffic planning. , The use of these roads by seasonal users and even more of concern short term guests or visitors is putting unfamiliar drivers into a very serious situation. Was accident history of the neighborhood reviewed? Has the traffic : consultant driven the road in winter? The Town of Vail does have plans to improve the North Frontage Road/Chamonix Road intersection. This was the,number 3 priority of the Vail Master Transportation Plan adopted March of 1992. This • will most likely occur within two years if financial partners can be found. The recommendation of Cortina Lane access over the North Frontage Road extension, based purely on traffic engineering criteria is not even a matter of consideration. From a transit and school bus issue, the nearest stops average 1'/2 mile to up to 2 miles away on the preferred alternative. The North Frontage Road alternative bus stops average 2/2 mile and maximum 11/4 mile. There must be a better alternative for both modes. Trip generation numbers can be determined and reviewed once the actual number and type of dwelling units are known. The biggest issue is what rates are being used and based on what. Trip . generation rates can be computed on dwelling units, persons, or vehicles for weekdays or weekends average day or peak times. The other item is the definition for recreational homes is as follows on the ITE Trip Generatiuon book. Recreational homes are usually located in a resort- containing local services and complete recreation facilities. These dwellings are typically second homes useci by the owner periodically or rented on a seasonal basis. The trips for determination of trip rates measured were at the access points to the resorts. Higher trips occurred within the resorts for recreational purposes: The trip rate used by the report would be the number o-f trips.at East Vail and Dowd Junction. Not the trips through the neighborhood. The worst case of trips on Saturday usirig dwelling units is.305. The worst case on Saturday using persons is 449 trips. If employee housing units are required these numbers go up. i ( • . ' . ' ~ Review of"Trappers Run 12/22/93 ' January 6, 1994 . Page 8 The peak trips need to be considered the worst case as this is when we have our worst situation and biggest impacts. The capacity analysis of the 4-way stop assumes a capacity of 1800 vehicles per hour (vph) maximum. This is based on a split of 55/45. This does not really explain split. The highway capacity manual states a split of 50/50 is that all approaches are evenly loaded through the peak demGnd period. The text also stGtes lesser capacities and more variable distribution of delay occurs where demand is not evenly split among all the approaches. This capacity is as follows: Split VPH LOS C 50/50 1900 1200 55/45 1800 1140 . 60/40 ' 1700 1080 65/35 1600 1010 _ . 70/30 1500 960 Further LOS C volumes are.much less than the capacity. It"is very disturbing how the traffic consultant stated we had LOS A for lnlest Vail when even if we were evenly split, current volumes are at or 28% above LOS C volumes. The analysis also does not consider any interference from-the'close proximity of the I-70 ramps to the operation of this intersection. The recommendation, the intersection is alright and no improvements are required are inaccurate. The improvements put forward to widen Cortina Lane are not possible to construct without impacting existing drives already over current grade standards. The improvements also. don't address the major deficiencies with this ' proposed access. Air Quality The report mentions road sanding as a generator of particulate pollution, however, it is not part of Table 1. Road sanding has ' been found to be one of the larger pollutants in the mountain communities. The report does not adjust the emission numbers, even , though access to the site has increased by one mile. The Existing roadways. will need greater maintenance effort as their class function changes from local to collector streets and transit and pedestrians use by the developments' residences is greatly discouraged with the increased distance from bus stops and activity . centers. The number of vehicle trips needs to correspond to the correct trips from the traffic report and to an accurate total trip length. , Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 9 . The previous trip length hardly gets residences out of the subdivision. The air quality report should discuss the impacts of the two different access scenarios. GJater Resources The Town of Vail drainage criteria requires, storm sewers to be designed for the 25 year flow. The report states a copy of the hydrauiic analysis is attached. I cannot find this. It would seem feasible to provide the bridge crossing with the old access and remove the roadway out of the stream and both alternatives are equal. There also exists the possibility to create.a sedimentation pond/water feature if access from the North Frontage Road is developed in conjunction to a pocket park. Veaetation When staff walked the site with the developer, there was significant Columbine in the forest understory. It is -not mentioned as being on the site. What is the net loss or trees if access is from the North Frontage Road and aligned next to the stream bed to miss tre%s. Is there an opportunity to develop a pocket p:rk at the realigned Arosa Drive area in this scenario? Does there exist any opportunity to create a usable pocket park to be shared by the Vail Ridge neighborhood with the Cortina Lane access alternative. , Development should exercise the Wildland Fire Design Guidelines which call for fuel clearing around structures. Developer should provide a standard for revegetation which we could evaluate -now in determining how well the site will be restored. Example and caliber or size of plant species per say 100 square feet of disturbance. Wetlands The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will make the determination. In either alternative, the stream should be avoided, except for near 90° crossings. Wildlife The current site acts as the buffer with the Vail Ridge neighborhood as stated, the relatively dense forest habitat serves- as a buffer between existing development and more open habitats.ori the forest land. Wildlife activity within this site.is not concentrated due to' close proximity to the sights, sounds and smells of humans in close proximi.ty to the site. Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 10 Human and especially, dog activity through the site greatly affects the wildlife activity patterns. The construction of another subdivision, similar to Vail Ridge with no buffer strip, pushes the wildlife further to the west. The comparison of wildlife habitat lost in the whole picture of wildlife habitat is similar to each rain forest logger/farmer comparing each of their properties to the greater whole. It is small, but in aggregate quite devastating.. How much of the remaining wildlife habitat is permanently protected irom any . harmful development? If not, I don't think it should be counted. It is also disturbing that Vail should not worry about wildlife : nearby, and this is not something people expect when recreating in this area. The report states very clearly, without reducing the number of , residential lots on Trapper's Run, it is difficult to maintain a wildlife buffer zone. This is because the best lot sites are in the area of any proposed buffer zone. The second fact of developing the entire dense forest zone, doubly eliminates any buffer caith the more open habitat of the forest lands, this is partially mitigated by a ridge line above the site. The original report states bear problems exist on the south side of I-70. There has also been many incidents of bears on the north, most particularly the residences adjacent to the development. Would suggest any development of this area require use of bear proof garbage'containers. Preliminary Geotechnical Investicration The first report, mentions construction of structures in the area of the Iandslide is not recommended. No underground utilities . which transport liquids should be constructed in the landslide area. The report does not identify the rock outcrops at the end of Cortina Lane, and the potential difficulty in constructing the roadway through it. The report does not, recommend a maximum fill slope or total fill. No alternative analysis of retaining wall systems was performed. It needs to be discussed regarding aesthetics, ease of construction, amount of disturbance and costs. Retained earth systems like-soil nailing or a Hilfaker System may be appropriate on the north.facing cut slopes, where revegetation of the steep slopes is possible with proper erosion control and revegetation procedures. Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 11 . . The second report states the landslide area can support structures with proper dewatering and engineered systems. Is there any special construction techniques required to stabilize the subgrade which averages more than 65 o passing the No. 200 sieve while the roadways are under construction. Does the on site material meet the specifications for suitable backfill with regard to Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls? How will the top soil on site be handled, stockpiled and reused during construction? How do the two access alternatives compare in scope with regards to geotechnical.analysis.? Enqineerincr Geoloqic Hazard Study The original report identifies the landslide area. It discusses the use of specific geotechnical measures, such as ground dewatering or removal of the slide soils and replacement with engineered fill which could be implemented to improve the stability of the ground. It then urges no high-value structure be built within the landslide area. The second report states the landslide area will be restabilized by . dewatering so buildings may be built to an acceptable risk level. The geologic report does not identify the rock out crop from Cortina Lane. The report should also analyze the difference access alternatives. Rockfall and Debris Flow Analvsis Which consultant has the final word with regard to rockfall hazard? The original report supports the the'ory that the original road design was poor due to the fact the roadway is in the ravine. It also assumed the road could not be altered. The second report shows, through use of large box culvert crossings, how the debris flow can be mitigated. This technique may also be used for a revised original road alignment. The second report still does not calculate any hard numbers on the extent or volume of debris expected. The report also looks at only a debris flow originating high up in the incised ravine, however, the geologic hazard report identifies tYiree landslide hazards just to the north of the site. These areas if lubricated with moisture, such as a heavy snow year, and/or intense rainstorms, if released, in conjunction with spring runoff would cause a debris flow event. Debris flow events are not similar to floods or avalanches in which you have return periods. Review of Trappers Run'12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 12 It is disturbing, the report mentions, no prio.r events have occurred in the valley so the danger is not as great. Prior to the 1984 events in Vail, it was also possible to view those.areas which flowed and state, no prior activity has occurred. Debris flow potential is based on havin(4 the right topograpnic, geologic and hydrologic cirQumstances at the right time to trigger an event. Once the event occurs, it may never happen again as the material _ wh?ch gave way is now no longer able to supply a possible second event from exactly the same spot. The second map shows the debris flow hazard as a single line, non- colored as compared to an area as tr.e first map. The hazard should be shown as the first map depicts. The report points out that the stream even though crossed with wide spar box culvert bridges,- results in fills 29-32 feet above the inverts of the stream. The report discusses how the water quality report provides a detailed discussion of the sites hydrology. None exists. The report should mention seme device which may hold back large embedded debris which could block the bridges, causing a danger off damming, structural damage to the box culverts, and exper.sive clean up. It may be best to provide a large grate to keep the largest material from becoming lodged in the box. This allows the moisture ' and majority of debris to pass. What special measures are needed to adequately design the roadway fill to sustain the pressures caused by potential damming upstream of the boxes.. The report mentions no issue with the rock out crop at Cortina Lane. Again the report should analyze the difference between the Cortina Lane access with a revised North Frontage Road access. Desian.Guidelines - It would be appropriate that professional engineers licensed architects and landscape architects work together to create the . best designs. 1) Building envelopes - as written will be hard to enforce. Who is the enforcer? How will the enforcement be carried out? 2) Driveway - as written violates Town of Vail ordinances. Maximum grades of 8% are allowed. ,3) Retaining wall - as written violates Town of Vail ordinances. Maximum height of 3' is allowed in front setback. 4) Trash housing - should also require use of bear proof trash containers, once they are placed outdoors for pickup. Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 Page 13 5) Roofing - material of natural cedar shakes appears out of character for wildland fire desi,gn guidelines. 6) Preservation of vegetation - requires all trees 4" in diameter to be shown. Should we require the subdivision plan, prior to approval to show ttie same? 7) Fire protection - Wildland Fire Design Guidelines should apply to the subdivision. Develcper should provide a standard for revegetation which we could _ evaluate now in determining how well the site will be restored. Example and caliber or size of plant species por say 100 square feet of disturbance. View Szudies/Computer Simulation - The original views irom the Brandess Building appears to be the wrong spot. This view should be the center line of tne westbound lanes of I-70. The photo as is, uses the development in the foreground as a-screen and it is not a view point many people have. The westbound centerlane is a view poirt everyone has, and has less foreground screening. It may be appropriate to zoom the shot from I-70, as it is impossible to simulate the view as one drives down I-70, but as one gets closer the. view will be greater. The simulations, should compare the two different access alternatives once refined and development density res.olved from the same view points and those additional suggested by staff. The Tins created for visual simulation show no grading disturbance for the houses as shown. Roadway P1ans An extensive review was not performed as of this time it is clearly not known what the final product will be. The public works department does not support the access from Cortina Lane. The Cortina access is not acceptable as proposed. If density accessing Cortina is greatly reduced this my be an alternative. The old North Frontage Road extension as previously shown, however, is not .approvable either, but a modification which removes major portions of the roadway out of the stream and uses the large concrete box culverts to convey the stream would be acceptable. Limited density access of Davos Trail with the use of large concrete box culverts may also be acceptable. The original discussions with the developer, discounted such an access point, ~ due to excessive fill, however, the current plan presents 32' of fill over the creek. Review of Trappers Run 12/22/93 January 6, 1994 P age 14 The plan as proposed, does have utilities carrying liquids within ' the landslide area. The plan as proposed has storm sewers dumping out onto lots and U.S. Forest Service property with out the proper drainage easements. How will erosion be handled at these points? How are flows picked up docan below? , The face of retaining walls and guardrail must be 2' behind the flowline of the gutter. A 5' tier on cut wells allows a very small plantable area. What is the tier.width for fill walls? The plan shows no disturbance on adjacent properties. It is unlikely to construct walls right at the property line without working in front of them. They do show grading on Lot 13 Block B Vail Ridge. Do they have permission? The project still heavily disrupts the stream with the construction of the sewer line connection. what is the total square footage of wall and what is tne square footage per various wall heights? Where are the construction staging areas? How will access to the forest lands be maintained during construction? As was stated before, the improvement to Cortina Lane are almost impossible and does not address the, most severe sections. The TIN's as developed do not adequately show grading disturbances of the building envelopes and driveways. As was stated before, the revegetation plan needs to present some standards fbr material per known area. " Trappers Circle grades do not start at 8% at station 0+00 as this is centerline of Trappers Road. The cross slope of Trappers Road should be 2 0 . The forest access needs to be separate from the access to Lot 27. It needs to not feel like one is using someones driveway. People won't use the access if it does. The second submittal access which raises the North Frontage Road if revised to keep out the stream may reach a better result. If the . point of raising the North Frontage Road was further to the east this would reduce the grade. The road can be realigned to stay out of the stream except ;for crossings.of the stream of which there would exist similar to the current plan, but with less fill above the creek. ! . Review of Trappers Run ?12/22/93 . January 6, 1994 Page 15 If this development is to be an actual project, it should be developed in a way'which meets the goals of the Town and makes an improvement as well. , GH\dsr DR:GHJC.106 ~ i t . i ; ~ ; . a u i . ,Z - li TOWN OF UAIL 75 Souih Frontage Road Departnzent of Public IVorks/TransPortation Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21531FAX 303-479-2166 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Curnutte FROM: Todd Oppenheimer DATE: January 4, 1994 . RE: Comments on Trappers Run 1st Supplemeri to E.I.R. dated December 14, 1993. i have review the supplemental Trappers Run submittai and have the following comments. The most significant comments relate to the visual sirnulaticns and the revegefation pian. Please ca11 me if you have any questions. : 1.. There are some inconsistencies in the wildlife supplement written by Lesiie : Malville. In two places she references the total proiect of 47 acres as no longer available to deer and elk but in the conciusion uses only the. 6.6 acres of ha;d surfaced area as unavailable. The noise visual and activity-related disturbar.;es will probably make at least the entire 47 acres unavailable to deer and elk. This - report should stress that boir.,t, 2. Design Guidelines. An additionai sentences to the last paragraph of the introduction that stresses a tearn approach between the Architect and landscape Architect would be b?neficial. Having both professions invo{ved from the beginning of the design process will help ensure that the structures are successfully integrated with the site. , 3. Design Guidelines, Preservation of vegetation. I would like to see two adci~ior•al ' ~points covered. First, existing vegetation, including trees, understory and ' groundcover should be dug and transpianted wherever possible. This technique, . ~ if properly done, greatly improves the overall revegetation of the site. Second, ' Page 2 JC - Trappers Run 1 /4/94 specifici plans for protection of existing vegetation to remain should be inciuded with the site plan submittal.. This way staff can evaluate the plans to determine if : it is feasible to save the vegetation identified. . 4. Question. Are construction related items such as erosion protection, construction fencing and trash re.moval, sufficiently covered in the Town of Vail design guidelines or should they be included in the Trappers Run guidelines as well? 5. Simulated View Four from Cortina Lane confains several errors that must be corrected in order to properly assess the visual impacts of the project. There are as follows: ~ a). The structure, building envelope and disturbed areas for lots 20, 21 and 23 and possibiy portions of 25 and 24 would be visible in the photograph. b). The utility easement disturbance between lots 21, 22 and 23 would be visible in the photograph. c). The stand of evergreen trees shown at the intersections of Trappers Circle . and Trappers Road will not remain. Utility Plan (sheet 4 of 5) shows an . "STM Filtration Tank system and associated piping to tie installed at that location. The second tier of wall as well as fhe roadway would be visible when the trees are removed. d). The evergreen trees drawn in over the top of the house on ?ot 29 do not exist. The disturbed area in this location extends from Trappers Circle almost tb the stream. There are no evergreens on the camera side of the stream. If yau look ciosely at the evergreens in the existing view all you . see are tree trunks in.the shadows. Much more of the road, disturbed areas and walls would be visible in this location. 6. The parking spaces for forest access included in the original plan have been omitted in this submittal. Severaf spaces should be located in the vicinity of lots 26 and 28. 7. The piants indicated on the revegetation plan are appropriate. The appiicant needs to submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans showing plant locations and quantities as weli as the irrigation system. A statement regarding maintenance responsibility should also be included. Specific seed mixes, application rates and muiching techniques should also be included. CC/Greg Hall . Larry G rafe i jlt . t ow . 42~il 42 west meadow drlve tire depertment vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-2200 . MEMORA.NDUM TO: JIPZ CURr'UTTE, DEPARTMENT OF COTa•NNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: MICHAEL riCGEE, FIRE MARSHAL DATE DE CEMBER 27, 1993 RE: TRAPPER'S RliN PROPOSP.L . We received another submittal for,the proposed Trapper's Run project, dated 12/22/93. We have reviewed the submittal and have the followir.g comments: Exhibit 9 of the Supplement to the Environmental Impact Report, titled Town oF Vail Service Impact Assumptions, has a statement under impacts to the Fire Department, that "no new equipment or systems are required." THIS ASSUMPTION IS FALSE. . h'e have identified no less than 10 impacts: The impacts are. 1. Zve anticipate an increase in the number and frequency of both fire and medical calls to the West Vail area as a resulL of the increased density, both during const'ruction and after occupancy. 2. We anti*cipate and increase in both the actual number and in the potential, threat of wildland fires due to construction and habitation, especially given the terrain, natural ground cover., slope, and the fact that the project is on L'he south facing slope. 3. Average response time to calls throughout the Town of Vail . will increase due to increased vehicular traffic, impact on the Saesto Vail interchange, and the amount of:time required for an engine to respond to Trapper's Run from the main Vail fire station and the time required to respond to other calls within the Villaqe and Lionshead from'West Vail. 4.. According to a recent analysis conducted by Merrick & Associates for Upper Eagle Consolidated Water and Sanitation District, the water system in the Vail area, especially on Cortina Lane, is currently inadequate to meet existing fire flow demands. Any additional demands on the water system must be addressed and improvements to the existing system should be made prior to any 'additional demands being made on the water system. TRAPPER'5 RUN . PAGE 2 . ~ 5. The Insurance Services Office/Commercial Risk Services (ISO) sets forth classifications for municipalities that directly affect insurance rates. ISO criteria require all points within the city to be within a certain distance of a fire station. West Vail does not currently meet those criteria. Deficiency points are assigned on a pro-rata basis for the percentage oi the city that is not within the specified distance from a fire station. Development of Trapper's Run will increasa the percent of the city not within the ISO's.specified:distance of a fire station, will result in more deficiency points, and a subsequent reduction in Vail's classification which may result in an increase in insurance rates for the properties throughout Vai1. 6. It is reasonable to assume.that as.with any new subdivision, there will be some increase in the number of calls.for service to that area. Trapper's Run lies at the most remote west end of the north side of the valley and will require more travel time for fire apparatus to respond to and return from calls in that area.. ~ While the on-duty fire crew is tied up with even a false alarm in the Trapper's Run subdivision, they are not available to respond to other, perhaps more critical, calls in the rest of Town. This reduction in the engine company's availability for response to the rest of Vail is aggravated by the longer response times. 7. The proposed access to the subdivision is*via Cortina Lane. Cortina Lane,was not, designed to handle any significant increase in traffic volume or imposed loads such as would result from heavy construction equipment, fire trucks, moving vans, and other heavy vehicles. Fire Department access will require we trayel up Chamonix . Lane, to Davos Trail, through multiple intersections, none of which : were intended or designed for heavy vehicle loads or high traffic either. 8. Cortina Larie was built under County standards in the 1960's and was designed for light.duty local traffic only.. It does not meet current minimum design standards but is an existing non- conforming situation, servicing about 12 homes. 9. Under the proposed design, Cortina Lane would be expected to provide access to 42 homes: The proposed design includes an ' adverse mix of minimums and maximums. The road is designed to the ' ; maximum road grade, minimum width, and insufficient turning radius, ~ and the cul-de-sacs within the proj ect do not allow a fire truck to ? turn around without making at least a three point turn. 1 . . . THE TIMES' MIDWEEK EDITION ~.~~Il~•~i~' ' ~ . ~00 ]ll alll~ll~ SC110~~S~11pS ° VA offer~ng $40, . . . - ¦ Times Staff Report for a total of four scholarships.per yeaL scliolarship applications. 'Iliition, fees, For the Community Scholarshi.p housing and booksat Colorado 5tate In the continuing pursuit of its goal Program,.students will be selected from rnlleges costs approarimately $7,500,~p,er to foster educational and leadership tlie Vail~ and Eagle.valleys Students year, while' the same costs at pnvate training in.the Vail Valley, Vail Associates must attend eitHer Battle.Mountain or colleges and universities can exceed will provide as much as $40,000 per Eag1e Valley high school. . . ' $20;000. . year in scholarships to the Vail Under the Staff, Scholarslup Program, "Access to oppoitunities m higher Leadership and Educaponal Assistance students will •be selected from the education ;is crucial for`every " high Program. immediate families of Vail Associates' school, student in the Vail Valley,%said y 'a ly. The program offers college full-time and seasonal employees.tnntli`a . Vail Assoc~ates"~Pres~dent ~And D - scholarships to qualified students who minimum of . 2,400 ho,urs., of np~ goal ~s;to make possible the dreain live in Vail and the surrounding accumulated time working for the ski of ~ four students who`: m~ght. no'f communities.. The _,purpose of the . company. :otherwise be able to consider attending program is to encourage exeellence in Vail Associates::~w~ll fiave no `control a four-year college `orunivers~ty" ' scfiolastic achieveinent, to. stimulate over the selection of _ award recipients Board .members will be ,Va~l =Mayor interest in higher education among and those eligible for staff 'scholarsliips Pe Osterfoss, :Avon Town -Manager young adults in the rnmmuni .ty, and to are not eligible for the Community gill James, Battle Mountain High School provide incentives -to qualified Scholarship Progr,am. :Scholarship P~a al Erik Fredell, Eagle Valiey:~High secondary school students. who hope to winners will be chosen by the ~ool Princi al Ivan Kershne~ Minturn obtain university or college degrees. Leadership and Educational Assistance S P Scholarships will be granted in Program Board of Directors. Mayor Ernie Chavez, Vail. Associates rnnnection with two programs: the Vail : Each scholarship will .be for $2,500 President Andy,:.Daly, and VA'' Vice Valley Community Scholarship Program each year for a maximum of four years, President of Administration Jerry,Olivez and the Vail Associates Staff Scholarship or $10,000. Award recipients must For more information call Oliver;Lat Program. Two scholarships will be identify the colleges or universities they 479=3065. " granted under each of the two programs are considering attending in their WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1991 11/19 NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES TOM M./JIM C.: What can be done to make these uniform Planning staff has met with the newspaper owners and reviewed locations and locations less prolific? for boxes. Existing boxes have been located and counted. The plan is to define appropriate locations for boxes and appearance. Streetscape Plan calls for encasing the boxes in woodframe. "Free speech" issues are. involved with the effort. Project will be prioritized with other CDD Long Range antl Special Projects for Council review in at the 3/8/94 Work Session. 1992 11/10 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS Next meeting to be announced. 1993 10/19 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF COUNCIUSTAFF: Follow-up and respond to petitions Appraisal underway. _Rick Moser has contacted developer who has TRAPPER'S RUN PARCEL presentetl at 10119193, TC Regular Evening meeting. referred him to a condemnation attorney. Mr. Moser still feels he can - have the appraisal by 1/31/94. 10119 SNOW STORAGE LAND GREG/LARRY G.: Immediately pursue purchase from VA Initial discussion between TOV and VA re: possible future land exchanges PURCHASE , of current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres have occurred. atljacent to the west. 12/07 REFERENDUM SUBMITTAL TOM M.: Supply detail re: immediate disclosure PROCESS requirements for referendum petitioners. (request: Johnston) 1994 Issue will be addressed at the 2122194 Work Session. 01/04 LIBRARY HOURS (request: Johnston) ANNIE; Complaints have been received re; library hours, i.e., holidays, evenings, overall not convenient for "working" residents. ' 01104 HANDGUN ORDINANCE TOM M./KEN: Draft ordinance re: sale of handguns/ Tom M. will collect some model ordinances and the issue will be (request: Lapin, w/consensus of automatic weapons (prohibiting!!!) within the town limits. discussed at the 2/22/94 Work Session. Council) Check on lobbying efforts through CML's Sam Mamet. February 18, 1994 Page 1 of 1 01/04 VAIL AVALANCHE SIGNS BOB McL: When events other than hockey are occurring in Bob McL. and Rob will view the site during the week of 2121/94. (request: Strauch) the arena, would VRD be willing to cover the garish neon signs? ' 02108 MANOR VAIL SIDEWALK BOB McL: Investigate blind corner. (request: Johnston) 02108 STATUS OF INCOMPLETE KRISTAN: What process tlo we have in place to encourage BUILDINGS , the completion of construction? Specifically, what is the (request: Navas) status of the "ruins" at the Westin? 02/08 PAY-IN-LIEU SITES KRISTAN; Review of sites within pay-in-lieu category will be considered and prioritized at the 318/94 Work Session discussion of Community Development projects. 02/09 VA CATEGORY III PRESENTATION EVERYONE: A Work Session presentation has been set for 3/22/94, with an Evening Meeting public presentation not yet determined. Please mark your calendars!! 02115 CUTTING PACK IN LIONSHEAD LARRY G.; A backhoe and truck were observed at 10:45 (request: Strauch) P.M. Saturday evening (2112/94) cutting ice pack and disturbing restaurant-goers and overnight guests. Please review both the timing and expense to TOV. 02115 REAL ESTATE BOXES (AS KRISTAN: Real estate boxes have been birthing at an OPPOSED TO NEWSPAPER unacceptable rate. REMOVE IMMEDIATELY!! BOXES) (request: Lapin) 02/15 CHUCK ANDERSON YOUTH PAM: Contact VRD about moving up the selection process Pam spoke with Robin Henzler (URD Youth Services) who indicated the AWARD to allow awards to be given during May PRIOR to following: Susan Anderson is aware of the tlifficulty in drawing applicants (request: Strauch) graduation or to be included with the graduation for this prestigious locai award and is willing to discontinue it. Please see ceremonies. attached article on VA scholarships. Perhaps it is timely to consider attaching some monetary scholarship amount? 02118 ORE HOUSE AWNING Permit April, 1993. Approval January, 1994. Staff will prepare a memo for Council explaining the date the awning will be reviewed. Staff will also include the awning agreement. February 18, 1994 Page 1 of 2 .