The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994-05-17 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1994 1:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. Site Visit: Ore House Awning, 232 Bridge StreeULots C and D, Block 5, Vail Village, lst Filing. 2. Discussion Re: Ore House Awning. 3. Interview of Candidates for Local Liquor Licensing Authority. 4. Discussion Re: Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1994, prior to second reading at the Tuesday, May 17, 1994, Vail Town Council Evening Meeting, an ordinance rezoning a tract from Primary/Secondary Residential, Section 18.13 to Low Density Mufti-Family Residential, Section 18.16 generally located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road more specifically described as: ' A parcel of land in the Southwest Cluarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point whence a brass cap set for a witness corner for the West Quarter of said Sectlon 14, bears (North 29 degrees 28 minutes 51 seconds West, 1073.08 feet Deed) (North 43 Degrees 15 minutes 02 seconds West, 915.96 feet Measured); Thence North 74 degrees OS minutes 19 seconds East, 10.76 feet; Thence 183.62 feet along the arc of a curve to the right which are subtends a chord bearing North 88 degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds East, 181.76 feet; Thence South 77 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds East, 62.77 feet; Thence 147.43 feet along the arc of a curve to the left which arc subtends a chord bearing North 86 degrees 36 minutes 17 seconds East, 145.60 feet; Thence North 70 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds East, 406.55 feet; Thence 54.10 feet along the arc of a curve to the right which are subtends a chord bearing South 47 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds East, 44.20 feet; Thence South 14 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds West, 110.51 feet; Thence South 68 degrees 18 minutes 91 seconds West, 320.00 feet; Thence North 19 degrees 07 minutes OS seconds West, 50.00 feet; Thence South 77 degrees 48 minutes 41 seconds West, 160.18 feet; Thence South 10 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds 1lVest, 36.48 feet; Thence North 87 degrees 40 minutes 06 seconds West, 337.72 feet; Thence (North 11 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds East, 130.00 feet Deed) North 11 degrees 55 minutes 31 seconds East, 129.75 feet Measured) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Bearing from G.L.O. record for South half of Section line between Sections 14-15. (G.L.O. record South Ol degrees 30.2 minutes East) (South Ol degrees 38 minutes 32 seconds East Measured) 5. Town Manager's Report: ~ a) Work Program for Employee Housing. b) Summary of Community Development Department Project Priorities. c) Cost of Planner. 6. Review of Resolution No. 13, Series of 1994, a resolution ratifying and adopting the Mission, Vision, Goals and Objectives for the Town of Vail, Colorado for 1994/95. 7. Information Update. 8. Council Reports. 9. Other. 10. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 11. Adjournment. 1 NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES SUBJECT TO CHANGE) 0000000 THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 5/24/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAIVIBERS. THERE WILL BE NO VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION ' ON TUESDAY, MAY 31, 1994. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/7/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/7/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • • • • C:WGENDA.WS 2 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1994 1:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 1:00 P.M. 1, Site Visit: Ore House awning, 232 Bridge StreeVLots C and D, Block 5, Vail Village, Randy Stouder lst Filing. Larry Anderson Action Requested of Council: Examine the current awning. Backqround Rationale: The DRB approval was temporary and the awning agreement allows Council to affect change or removal if good reason for such exists. Staff Recommendation: See the attached memorandum for guidance from Vail Village Design Guidelines and Streetscape Master Plan. 1:20 P.M. 2. Discussion re: Ore House awning. Randy Stouder Larry Anderson Action Requested of Council: Discuss awning agreement with Ore House owner to determine if changes are necessary. 1:50 P.M. 3. Interview the three candidates for the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Pam Brandmeyer ' Action Reauested of Council: Review written applications from Don White, Amy Fritz, and Elizabeth Pickett. A ballot vote will be taken for two of the three candidates at the Tuesday, May 17, 1994, Vail Town Council Evening Meeting. Backqround Rationale: Terms for pon White and Mitzi Gimenez on the Local Licensing Authority expire June 1, 1994. Don White is re-applying. 2:00 P.M. 4. Discussion Re: Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1994, prior to second reading at the Andy Knudtsen Tuesday, May 17, 1994, Vail Town Council Evening Meeting, an ordinance rezoning a tract from Primary/Secondary Residential, Section 18.13 to Low Density Multi-Family Residential, Section 18.16 generally located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road more specifically described as: A parcel of land in the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point whence a brass cap set for a witness corner for the West Quarter of said Seciion 14, bears (North 29 degrees 28 minutes 51 seconds West, 1073.08 feet Deed) (North 43 Degrees 15 minutes 02 seconds West, 915.96 feet Measured); Thence North 74 degrees OS minutes 19 seconds East, 10.76 feet; Thence 183.62 feet along the arc of a curve to the right which are subtends a chord bearing North 88 degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds East, 181.76 feet; Thence South 77 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds East, 62.77 feet; Thence 147.43 feet along the arc of a curve to the left which arc subtends a chord bearing North 86 degrees 36 minutes 17 seconds East, 145.60 feet; Thence North 70 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds East, 406.55 feet; Thence 54.10 feet along the arc of a curve to the right which are subtends a chord bearing South 47 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds East, 44.20 feet; Thence South 14 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds West, 110.51 feet; Thence South 68 degrees 18 minutes 91 seconds West, 320.00 feet; Thence North 19 degrees 07 minutes OS seconds West, 50.00 feet; Thence South 77 degrees 48 minutes 41 seconds West, 160.18 feet; Thence South 10 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds West, 36.48 feet; Thence North 87 degrees 40 minutes 06 seconds West, 337.72 , feet; Thence (North 11 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds East, 130.00 feet Deed) North 11 degrees 55 minutes 31 seconds East, 129.75 feet Measured) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Bearing from G.L.O. record for South half of Section line between Sections 14-15. (G.L.O. record South Ol degrees 30.2 minutes East) (South Ol degrees 38 minutes 32 seconds East Measured) Applicant: Juanita I. Pedotto represented by Greg Amsden, 1 Backqround Rationale: On April 11, 1994, the PEC voted 4-0-1 (with Greg Amsden abstaining) recommending approval of the requested rezoning and minor subdivision. There are several letters from neighbors which are included in the packet. During Council Work Session on April 12, 1994, Council called up the minor subdivision request. Council approved the minor subdivision on May 3, 1994, with a 4-3 vote and made it contingent upon approval of the rezoning. On May 3, 1994, Council approved the rezoning on first reading with a 5-2 vote. In addition to the ten conditions of approval listed in the PEC memo, Council added four more conditions to the plat, including: 1. No 250 square foot additions shall be allowed for any dwetling unit on this parcel. 2. A homeowner's association shall be established prior to the issuance of a TCO to insure maintenance of the common area. 3. The deed restrictions for the three employee housing units shall include language requiring the units to be rented, and requires the rental rate be comparable to market rates. 4. The maximum GRFA allowed on this site shall be 25,900 square feet. Staff has attached a list of all theconditions which will be placed on the plat. Issues such as the construction of the sidewalk and construction of the employee housing units are identified in that list. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1994, on second reading at the Tuesday, May 17, 1994, Vail Town Council Evening Meeting. No action needs to be taken on the subdivision as that was approved by Council on May 3, 1994. 2:30 P.M. 5. Town Manager's Report: Bob McLaurin a) Work Program for Employee Housing. (45 mins.) b) Summary of Community Development Department Project Priorities. (30 mins.) c) Cost of Planner. (30 mins.) Action Requested of Council: Review enclosed memos. 4:15 P.M. 6. Review of Resolution No. 13, Series of 1994, a resolution ratifying and adopting the Bob McLaurin Mission, Vision, Goals and Objectives for the Town of Vail, Colorado for 1994/95. Action Requested of Council: Review Resolution No. 13, Series of 1994, in _ preparation for reading and vote at the Tuesday, May 17, 1994, Vail Town Council Evening Meeting. 4:30 P.M. 7. Information Update. 8. Council Reports. 9. Other. , 10. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 11. Adjournment. . 2 NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 5/24/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THERE WILL BE NO VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION OM TUESDAY, MAY 31, 1994. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/7/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING ' W1LL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/7/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. A • • • • • • < C:VIGENDA.WSE 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 17, 1994 SUBJECT: Ore House awning agreement . a}vav.;~~ %ro.~ , ~ti ~vti ~u~„~+`va~~4~~ti ~uti. ti~}~.ya~~i~w~~~;}~~~~~ ~ a~r~w.~~~~ ~~~,v~~~x ~ ~~»t~k~+~k~..~~r.~ :~r~+.~~h ~~~~~r.~~~ ~~+n~.~~ ~r~k~va~v~~wxa~~~ :r •.~a ~ ~ ~ ~ \ . , ~ ~ , .....:,.•.1;`:~•:.,;..,.~;:....:.:.••.: +a ~L~~.~+a+q,~~ti*,*~ vn\~\~. JZ::... ~ ~4 . ~ . .n\}1.~. ~~.y.~+:.. ~v~~\..u.i\.:.vk.. •J.?.v •.v: }v: ::•.l':.w::.~v.4~::: t: v.~ ~vn~\~» ~v...~ t\,-.v~ .\.:~}•,••.:~:.;•.y: .v v\\+v}v};;~,.~.tti.}~}}»::?:.. :..S:..x\~~~~.~;~.~.1..+:;,\;v,4:j.i,tii{ii~'>.?i\:v.~~:.~~:.\.v:...~x4 v~y\.:n~•.:.::w:::... v.\., .~.4~\\;.;.v.~\,M1;;.~~~ ..\\\".v;:~..::.i?'•`\.. \•}~;.~~.;.;~.:i:.......h........... ?.:.~.\+}'O:•ii}i:•:~~~\:'.hu;~...;.~~vyv..\:'a~.........,•,... . ~:,~j.~\y:c+:~:.;:::...•...~.,:a\:a3:;\+0:..~.;:::a:,.,....~:..•::.,..,,~~+:xc:x;.,,.. . .:.~a.•..a.,,~\..., : ...,'.ti , .\\....\.u~ } A\4.. . .l. h.. ..\\.y~~~ v}~.. .i:\.. '.ti.\ - '~v\.:i .~~..:.\v. iJti~\ : :\+•\~v \i}`, ..a,,.~a,a\~a: ~.v..\~,. .a. .>.4» :a~.> : u.. .4... ,...:::>:;o:~.~.:......\,•.,...;:::>:....4.,:••.k,.\;:~....;:..,,~:+?c~,,,,':',+~': .:v.::.?.y.,,...a:•x., .•..;.yr}.,-..;... ,,,.....~••..••.\`:`:'':.':3. ti. '+:1+1}y . d'•? v:}~0.ti.:4.....:.. \1.v:i.:~•n\\~.~......`y..\.i:::\......v::~..;, i .~.~..~~..v..vn1~:L';~v{~:k{i.`,.`,~Yii•'.iti~..n.n.\ :v4vk:{:ii-::ii~n\.~vr•n1t~ v. v~, .}~ti....•.z}•.}yv , ~ . w, , . w..,,\ ? , ......,...,,..,...,.....,.....,,..,,k.,.,,.,...,~.:~,.:,..::;,:,.,.::;;:;,\ti.,.~:.,.,,..~•:.,::,.1\,~;:;;a\\.\l:`.'£,':::~R?~~.,\::;;:•:;:~::C;;\\•~k.,~ 1. BACKGROUND On June 3, 1992, the Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the Ore House application to install a permanent awning across the front of the restaurant. The awning would be approximately 12 feet deep and 55 feet long along the west side of the Clock Tower Building adjacent to Bridge Street. The DRB members voted to approve the Ore House awning application by a 3-2 margin. The Town Council called this item up at the June 16, 1992 Town Council meeting. Shelly Mello reviewed the opinions of the various DRB members and why they voted for or against the application. Sherry Dorward voted for the application stating that the awning would extend the use of the deck and add vitality to the area. Ned Gwathmey and Gena Whitten opposed the awning stating that it would enclose and narrow Bridge Street to an unacceptable level and would not comply with several Vail Village Design Considerations. Following the review of DRB opinions, Peggy Osterfoss stated that she also felt that several Design Guidelines had not been met, specifically, there was not a varied height, there was no irregular street edge, and the suNshade issue on the deck had not been adequately addressed. After some discussion, Merv Lapin moved to uphold the DRB decision. Bob Buckley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion was defeated 3-4 with Jim Gibson, Jim Shearer, Tom Steinberg and Peggy Osterfoss in opposition. Following further discussion, Merv Lapin moved to modify the DRB's approval to a one year temporary approval with the contingency that Larry Eskwith draft a written agreement between the applicant and the Town establishing temporary approval and allowing the Town to request the removal or modification of the awning at the end of one year. A removal or modification request would need to be based on the determination that the installation did not meet the Vail Village Design Considerations. Bob Buckley seconded the motion, a vote was taken, and the motion passed 4-3 with Jim.Shearer, Tom Steinberg and Peggy Osterfoss opposed. A copy of the minutes are attached. On March 8, 1994, at Council's request, staff reviewed the awning agreement and brought the ' findings to the Town Council. Staff's memo stated that the Town Council had until January 18, 1995 to review and require modifications or removal of the awning. A copy of the March 8, 1994 memo is attached. 1 II. VAIL VILLAGE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Attached to this memorandum are the pertinent sections of the Vail Village Design Considerations. These considerations shouid be used to guide any decision regarding a modification or removal request for the Ore House awning. The major points to consider are as follows: _ "•Street Enclosure - An external enciosure is most comfortabie when its walls are virtually half as high as the width of the space enclosed. If the ratio falls to a quarter or less, the space seems unenclosed: If the height is greater than the width, it comes to resemble a canyon. When exceptions to the general height criferia occur, special • design consideration should be given to creating well defined ground floor pedestrian emphasis to overcome scale problems. Canopies, awnings, and building extensions can all create a pedestrian focus and divert attention from the buildings. •Street Edqe - Buildings in the Village Core should form a strong but irregular edge to the street. Plazas, patios and green areas are important focal points for gathering, resting and orienting and should be distributed throughout the Village with consideration to spacing, sun access, opportunities for views, and pedestrian activity. •Views and Focal Points - When evaluating a development proposal, priority should be given to an analysis of the impact of the project on views. Views that should be preserved originate from other major pedestrian areas or public spaces. •Sun/Shade - On all but the warmest summer days, shade can easily lower temperatures below comfortable levels and thereby negatively impact use of those areas. All new or expanded buildings should not substantially increase the spring and fall shadow pattern on adjacent properties or the public right-of-way. •Decks and Patios - Decks and patios, when properly designed and sited, bring people to ihe streets. A review of successful decks and patios in Vail reveal the following common characteristics: - •Direct sunlight from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. ~•Elevated feet to give views into pedestrian area. •Physical separation from pedestrian walk. •Overhang gives pedestrian scale/shelter. Decks and patios should be sited and designed with due consideration to sun, wind, views and pedestrian activity." •Accent Elements - The life, and festive quality of the Village is given by judicious use of accent elements which give color, movement and contrast to the Village. Colorful accent elements consistent with existing character are encouraged, such as awning. and canopies. cArandyVnemos\orehous.tc 2 ~ MEMORANDUM . TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 8, 1994 _ SUBJECT: Ore House awning agreement . +n~ux~ :m:nr.. ? »r .rm+xr:. . ~~,,.,..~~n .r~:, yx>~~-t.~>,~.: h;o.v,~.~,y`;~„~>~~n~:;>.a::... :~.~,~,a,S; .,~~:..«.~~hx};^.h~~)~`~~.A,`;ttra~~~+`C;M1~~\\'~t~v=~~;~.'c'.'~ ~~:c~~~~~e:~.~r.,. . ,.a. .,..~,~,4,,i,.;...,.~.,.,,:?.~r.:>as,.•~.. r.ti... ...\..~....\.,t: 14iv'?~•;~•T?^\•...+*\}:~4\~i4.vv..v:\~`.~., ~,.;i ..1,. ..~'~'"5.`.e•~~~t..±~::~.,•:~~. ..a,.. . ..•?tir ..~.'~K:..,.%~:•:~..4 \ ....:r..~..'..~.~....~r . . . :.........n . ..T. ~:`:v;:..'+.::. , • r.t•:. •::atSo->+ ~:••:,~:>•;•:::..~ti: ;•.,~.`.a.,,.~:.,,....ti.,.;~:a<•'.\.xa..:;~,o:;~:.:;•t~:::S:•.....::i...: .•.*v:: ti, . ~c.*.~..,.•:.,..:.::.,.... ;.•k\'............~+.`::'c.\;..~.:.a\.;:.........•,..,.• ~i'>.r ::4:\::j•:R:i•::i+~'~'~:A.~..\~.; p., n . .4; . T. .~{.~.:4\^\...~ . i^\~...:.y..~ 1.;~,..,\\.{.~1.v.,.w~4i\•. •::~.,L,. i.'.~ ..:\.:..~v ~ v..•:•:.~^.... .\w\M:•i4: n ...1;.y......Ti:•'.•i " ..\....»....?\~)~.'4~.i`h+\v.~~..\n\\. ..t+:Ji>ry::.w:?:.C~::.~`. ?.~~.i.~,vy}i::`i'~'>.•'..:~•: .i'...' . . x•..v. w~:.l . . ....4:.y:i•;••;?;\.:n.;.h.i:^:i:^}:Y•:{•?hv':}i.~\•:4~~+ni:J%•:::±t~yl}_.\+~{;....~\i•.::J:C:;{}J:v:}i:vn ~n.~~~~ .......~v...~::T.l:.q ~1C.y.~a\4.}.4\......~.....~~..n... .;.....4...,-.~.:n..:`:::: • : . . : ...v:?v-.~ v: \ •ti:. ~.:nv: vw:...v . ~v. •`y+•:.-.~ w. . ~~~v.ti:\i0• : •.2 ti`.;.,.h..,,,:,•I.t;C~:w;:~'u3:a>'.t~`:{k:;tii::Sva::a::iSR.ti'.~^i;45:t:;:'k`. v`......,,;I..v..;v.::aa:;2~~;::?v:::.:;;..a~:J\~,~....;,.\arti\:w.\.•...,~,~.......ti£a.,~1~av..•w..\;:'t:::'.'~2;;;x,~...,.. ~~:a\CY:;i::~;Y:~....,......v:::::.::ac.~. Staff has reviewed the Ore House awning agreement executed between the owners of the Ore House and the Town of Vail. The agreement states that: "the Town Council shall have one year after the final Building Department inspection of the awning to demand modification of the awning design or the ~ removal of the awning." ` The awning was installed by the Ore House in late April or May of 1993. It appears from a review of the permanent file that the Ore House never called for a final inspection on the awning. After a routine review of the files and activities, the Building Department discovered the need for a final inspection, and completed that inspection on January 18, 1994. Thus, the Town has until January 18, 1995 to demand the modification or removal of the awning. Such a demand is required to be in writing and must date the modifications that are required by the Town Council or the demand for removal of the awning. MINTJTES . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 16, 1992 7:30 P.M. regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, June 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, . MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor' , . - Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Bob Buckley • . Jim Gibson . . Rob LeVine - = Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg . MEMBERS ABSENT; none TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT; R,on pbill,ips, Town Manager . " Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney • ' Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager . Martha Raecker, Town Clerk Item twelve on the agenda was a call up by Town Council of the Design R.eview Board (DR.B) deasion approving the installation of an awning located on the west side of the Clock Tower Buildi.ng (Gorsuch building) for the Ore House Restaurant, 232 Bridge Street, Lot A, Block 5, Vail Village First Filing. Shelly Mello gave a brief overview of the project, stati.ng the owners of the Ore House R.estaurant made a request to lacate a green awning approximately 12' in depth with a combined length of bb' along the west side of the Clock Tower Building adjacent to Bridge Street. The Design Review Board voted 3-2 to approve the request, with Sherry Dorward citing in her motion the installation would extend the use of the deck and add vitality to the area. Ned Gwathmey and Gena Whittea of the DARB cpposed the motion, 5.ndi.ng that although the request did conform with a number of the Vail Village Design Considerations, it would enclose and narrow Bridge Street to a.n unacceptable level and would not comply" with several of the Vail Village Design Considerations. Ore House owners Larry Anderson and John Beaupre presented their project and stated they had full support from .David Gorsuch, the building owner. Rod Slifer, owner of the adjacent building, stated he was concerned with the permanency of the year•round awning and the protrusion of the buildi.ng into the street. Peggy Osterfoss said several Design Guideli.nes had not been met, speci.fically, there was no varied height, no irregular street edge, a.nd Lbe sun and shade issue on the deck had not been adequately addressecL. After fiuther discussion, Merv Lapin moved to uphold the DRB decision. Bob Buckley seconded that motion. A vote was taken and the motion was defeated, 3-4, with Jim Gibson, Jim Shearer, Tom Steinberg, and Peggy 4sterfos opposed. Followi.ng further discussion, Merv Lapin moved to modify the DRB's approval to a one-year temporary approval with the plaa as proposed. This motion also called for Larry Eskwith to draft a written agreement between the applicant and the Town regarding this temporary approval as it relates to the removal of the awni.ag should it be determined that the installation dces not meet the Vail Village ; design considerations. Bob Buckley seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion passed, 4-3, ~ Ji.m Shearer, Tom Steinberg, and Peggy Osterfoss opposed.. . At this ti.me Council returned to items ten and eleven on the agenda. Item ten was the Town of Vail and va;] Resort A:ssccie-jation (VR.A) Visitor Centers Agreement providi.ag for staff~ng-of TOV's Visitor Centers . . . . . . . , . . • . TOWN OF VAllJS80•VAII.,INC . ' • AWNING AGREEMENT. • . THIS AGREEMENT tnade and entered In1o on June 16, 1992 by and between the Town ot VaA, , . a Cobrado municipal corpcration ('the Townl, and SBD•Vaff. IncN dba The Ore House, a Cotorado - corporalion ('The Ore House'.) ~ RECITAIS ' 1. On June 3. 1992, a hearing was held belore the Town o! Vait Design Review Board to - detertnine whelher or not fo approve The Ore House's application to Insfaq a permanent awninB . . R . approximalely twelve (12) leet in depth wilh combined 1enBth oi tilty-(ive (55) ieel, abng the wesl side of . ' the Cbdc Tower buiidng acrjacenl to Bridge StreeL 2. Subsequeni lo the hearing, the Design Review Board voted to approve The Ore House's • . . appficailon for Ihe insiatlation ol the awning. .3. The dectslon o(1he Design Review Board was appeated to the Town CeuncA pursuant to . the Municipal Code ot the Town ol Vail and a hearing on the.appeal was heard by the Town CounW on June 16, 1992. • 4. Subsequenl to the presentation of the tacis ietatinD fo the appeat betore the Town CouncA, ' the Town CouncD suggesfed, and the appYicant apreed, thaf the Design Review BoarQ's approvat ol the awninp should be modilied irom a permanenl to a femporary approval,lasling not more lhan one (1) year from the date ol the inslaliation ol ihe awning. • 5. The Town CouncD requesled that the applicant and ihe Town enler Into a wriiten apreement setting toAh the femu and condtl'ans relating to the temporary Design Review Board appraval • 01 The Ore House awning. - ' AGREEMENT NOW. THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as lollows: " 1. In axordance wilh the decision ol Town Council at the June 16, 1992, hearing appeating . the Design Review Board approval o! The Ore House awning at the regulir meeting, The Ore Hovse is • hereby given a temporary approvat to install the awning as more paAiwtarly set foAh in the design and pian attached to ihis agreement as Exhibit "A", Subsequeni lo the installalion of the awning, The Town Council sha11 have one (1) year afler the tinal Bulding De_ p` a~ ent inspenion of the awning to demand modification , ol the awning design or the removai of the awning. • 2 Should the Town Council demand elther the modification or the removal oi the awning, it shali notity The Ore House in wriling oi eilher the moditical;on required or the demand lot removai, as the case may be. ' 3. il The Ore House tails to make the necessary modification 10 the awning sel lodh in ihe ' • , c~ . . .l . _ . R , . , Town PouncH notice or (ail lo remove the awning, as the case may be, within ihiRy (30) days of such . .~notice,lhe Town or 1s agent or representalives shap have Ihe righi to enler onlo The Ore House premises ' . and remove lhe awning. Any expenses Incurred by the Town related lo the removal of lhe awning shap . be reimbursed to the Town by Tha Ore House wtlhin thtAy (30) days of such removal. . 4. This agreement represents the entire understandng of the pariies and shall not ba ~ amended excepl by a subsequenl written apreemeni siBned by the parties.. THE TOWN OF VAIL - ~ ' BY . L : . . ' . Larry . r 1ei. A oi g Town Manager . ' SBD•VAIL, INC. • , . . eY. . - arry Ande son - , ; caonoousE.ucw , , : . . , _ ~ . f ~ ~f INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT " TOWN OF VAIL DATE JOB NAME a~!=- ~ ~J ~~;-G•: ~ . • CALLER ~ • . . , . ' . READY FOR INSPECTION: • MON WED THUR FRt ' AM PM LOCATION: 7-37_ ~/I//~~-' 'S~~ • ~ ' . . ~ BUlLDING: PLUM8ING: O FOOTINGS / S.TEEL O UNDERGROUND . . O FOUNOATlON / STEEL O ROUGH / D.W.V. , O FRAMING O F30UGH / WATER 0 ROOF 8 SHEER • ' O GAS PIPING ' PLYWOOD NAILiNG ~ D INSULATION O POOL / H. TUB I ~ O SHEETROCK NAIL p i ; O p i. ~lNAI O FINAL . . . ELECTRICAL: ~ MECHANICAL• • . . O TEMP. POWER O FiEA71NG O ROUGN O EXHAUST HOODS ' O CONDUIT 0 SUPPLY AIR ~ O O ~ . : ;t. O F1NAL O FINAL YOR . . • &gDVED O DISAPPROVED ~ O REINSPECTION REOUTAED ; RECTIONS: • ; . . . . 1 . ~ . . . . , , I~_..' . . •i.. ~ . . . ;t . . . j• : • f:..• . . . . . ~ ~ , DATE INSPECTOR ~ ~ • . • ~ r~ • w:nsv . ' . ' ' . • ' . . ' . , - _x' . . . . . . , . , . . , . ~ : . • . ~ . . . . ' . • : • ' ' , . ' ' . . ~ . • ~ ~ • . • ~ • . . . • 4 ' - • • . , , • . . • • ~ - • . . ' ~ • ' . . . . ~J • . . . ~ . ' . . . . ~ . • , " ~ . ~ ~ • ~ . ' . . • ~ . ~ ~ ~ , ~ • . ~ ~ . . ' , ' , ~ • . ' • ' • ~ • • . . • ~ • , . . . ~ 't• ~ • ~ • . ~ . . . , • ~ . . . • . . ~ ' . . . ~ . . - 4-: ~ . . . . . . . . • :~n~;,~' . • ~n. ' . ..e'y..'`~:i . . . : :"Si19W~. ':t~ :'~+i~~•F.in:.Wn::i. . . . . . • . ~ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .M . . . . , . . . . . . . ~ ' ~ • , ' • • . , . . • . ~ • J . . ' , Y ~ . . ' . . . : . . . , ' . ~ : ~ • ~ . S . . . . . ih_~'`` , • , • . . . ' , ' ~ 'i r. ' , ~ M . ~ ~ " ' , • y~ .j' o . : i . • . ~~---+'~~-~y'-' L~M~ ,f ~f.. ;a% r(~ ~yY• Y'f; f;;*• ~ ,,t - LL- ~.~,s,-" r ` ~``~s e ~f• ~ 1 ~ i a' '~,~T^ Tj r ~ I y - _ - ~ .~~_'W~••~~ ~ ' b~~ 1 ' ) -~-~..-_~...T_._ 1 ^V ~d •n~y "`-S.~ I . .r~ _ ~ ~1' ~ ` • ~4 w.•. .+l%+L•'?~~~ ~~~~1;~ ;r' •i~ • , ' 1 y ~ ' . ' . . ' . . . ~ ~ . . ' i . . , . . . • ~ , i COIORADO SiEEI ING ' • . , . • . , , l . ~ . } . . . ~ . . : , ' ~ •r , . : . • • . t " . i ' . : . S VAIL VILLAGE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS . , Orfgtnal Date June 11, 1980 Revised January 15, 1993 . INTRODUCTtON Backqround , rThese Design Considerations are,an integrat part of the Vail Village Urban Design Plan. The F1an as a whole is the culmination of many month's effort by residents, . merchants, Town staff, and consultants to develop a mechanism to manage physical change in the Village. It is an attempt to identify aspects of the physical character of,the Yil]age and to assure as far as possible that future changes will be consistent with the established character, and will make positive con- tributions to the quality of life. Vail was originally conceived as a mountain resort in the pattern of quaint European alpine village. It remains fairly faithful to that image today, because of the comnibnent of its early founders to that concept. However, recent rapid growth, both in size and popularity, has introduced new pressures for development, which many feel threaten the unique qualities from which that success has been derived. There are rapidly increasing land values and resulting pressures to expand existing buildings, infill parcels, and even total7y re- develop parceis less than 15 years old. This pressure for growth has brought with it the potential for significant change. flew materials, new architectural styles, the premiurri on land usage, and sheer numbers of people and cars all have potentially major impacts on the character and function of Vail. That is not to imp]y that all growth and change in Vail is negative. There are many areas that are underdeve7oped. The actual area of Vaii that gives it its • unique character is but a small area of the Village. There are definitely oppoctunities to extend the character of the Core beyond its current limits. These Design Considerations, and the Urban Design P]an as a whole, are intended to guide growth and change in ways that will enhance and preserve the essential qualities of Vail Village. This character, while inspired to a degree by E-uropean models, has evolved into a distinctly local interpretation. Any standards, in the end, must be based upon Vail's obvn unique characteristics. and potential now. To preserve this character, care must be taken to avoid both new architectural prototypes, and historical ones, local or foreign, which do not share the same design vocabulary. These Design_Considerations are a recognition that there is a distinctive design character to the Yillage and that this character is important to preserve. The Design Considerations . . The characteristics identified herein, are first of all, descriptions of the primary form-giving physical features of the Village: They are not exhaustive. They are a description of those key elements without which the image of Vai1 would be noticeably different. They are divided into two major categories: i . ;•Urban DesiQn Considerations General, large-scale land use planning issues, as well as form considerations - which affect more than one property (or even whole areas). These considerations are primarily !he purview of the Planning and Environmental Cortmission. This Comnission also has review responsibilities for additional zoning code compliance such as density control, pnrking, etc. Architecture/Landscape Considerations Detai.l, details, style and overall appropriateness of a design for a given site. These considerations are reviewed primarily by the Design Review Board (DRB). . Below is a general checklist of ma3or issues and concerns which the applicant must address in the course.of.the review_process. Each of the following items should be addressed at least briefly in any application hearing or submittal: Urban Desiqn Considerations Architectural/Landscape Considerations 1. Pedestrianization 1. R~OPS 2. Vehicle Penetration Farm . 3. Streetscape Framework Pitth' 4. Street Enclosure Overhangs • 5. Street Edge Composition 6. Building Neight Stepped Roofs 7. Views Materials . . Construction Zoninq Code Items 2, Ff-Sh-cr$ Materia)s 1. Density Control Color 2. Landscape Area Reduction Transparency 3. Parking Windows 4. Doo rs 5. Trim 6• 3• 8,4LCONIES Color Siie Ma55 - Materials Construction . 4. DECKS I PA7IOS ' 5- ACCENT ELEMFNTS 6• LANOSCAPE ELEMENTS . P]ant Materials Paving Retaining Walls Lighting Signage 7. SERVICE Materials ConstrucLion , ii Secondly,.the design considerations are intended to serve as guideline design ~parameters. They are not seen as rigid ruies, or "cookbook design elements" to bring about a homogeneous appeararice in Yail. Rather, they are a statement of .interpretation, subscribed to by the Town Planning/Environmental Commission and Review Board, as to the present physical character and objectives of the Yillage. They are intended to enable the Town staff and citizen review boards to more clearly communicate to property owners planning and design ob3ectives, and allow property owners in town to respond=in general cortformance or to clearly demonstrate why departures are warranted. Finally, these guidelines are intended to help infiuence the form and design of buildings, not to establish minimum b.uilding volumes:. Often more than one . criteria applies to a.given situation e.g. Building lieight, Enclosure, Views and Sun/Shade - all are concerns applicable to building height and massing - and they may be mutually conflicting if 3udged on equal terms. It is the role of the review boards, together with the applicant, to determine the re7ative importance of each eonsideration for a given situation. They then nust apply those considerations to assure that a ba]ance is achieved between the rights of the public and private sectors. . . iii . URBAN DESIGN +CONSIDERATIONS , - . . - , A. PEDESTRI,4NIZATION . All new or expansion construction should anticipate the appropriate level of " pedestrianization adjacent to the site. A major objective for Vail Village is to encourage pedestrian circulation through an interconnected network of safe, pleasant pedestrian ways. Many of the improvements recogni2ed in the Urban Design Guide Plans, and accompanying Design Considerations, are to reinforce and expand the quality to pedestrian walkways throughout the Village. Since vehicular traffic cannot be removed from certain streets (bus . routes, delivery atcess) a totally car-free pedestrian system is not ~ achieveable throughout the entire Village. Therefore several levels . of pedestrianization are proposed: • ~ . . . 1• pedestrian-only streets : 00, . ~ Y1 ' • , t . . ~ . ~ . i~idF{~ r~r~Fb ~ t . ~,~r.~~: ~ ~ ~ ~~f . r•:~ - . , 1 • ~ - ~•i~ t ~'~Ij, y..~.a ~.Je~ w~~~ i~... . ~ : J•lY+~'.-3 . . C ~i~~lr;•~:.r~r ! '•'r'~" _ ~ 2. pedestrian streets aith limited del•ivery traffic- w~k ~ass ~n~~ad ~dlj~ with sufficient width for unimpeded Qedestrian ~ wal ki ng , : . , - = 3. sepzrated.pedestrian walks . Nhere street wi.dth and . ~ . traffic rolume (trucks, t. ' shuttle bus, eLc) preclude . joint vehicle/pedestrian . • O use af the roadway • ' ::~':c , ' LZ' I , 4, primary vehicular routes- minimal pedestrian . development confined to . wide shoulder, sidewalk, or separate pathway. . :The Framework Girculation Plan, and - 'sub-area Guide Plans designate the specific type of street develop- •ment.desired for maj.or streets in Yail Yi7lage. , 2 : S. YEHICLE PEHETRATION ~ ~ To the maximum extent possible.nll - non-resident traffic should be erouted along the Frontage Road to Vail Yillage/. Yail LionsHead parking structures. 'In con3unction with pedestrinnization `5~niq¢ anr~ t~ " . -vbjectives, major emphnsis is focussed . - upon reducing auto penetration into - JnihiMizB the center of the Yilla9e. Ynil Road ~ and. Yai i Val ley Ori ve Ni l l conti nue y~f0 1~~t1~6 - -U serve as tbe orajor routes for . " service and resident nccess to the Viilage. • Road constrictions, traffic circles. ~a{'~ ~~`~~dj$&5e A signage, and other measures are ~wj eft fricfI bnsfo p indicated in 7he Guide Plans to visually and physicaily discourage ~ ~?,y~~~ ~„~~,y~ ,O all but essential vehicle penetration ~ DnJr O beyond the Frontage Road. Alternative access points and private parking - tZitz'zi relocation, where feasible, should be considered to further reduce traffic conflicts in the Village. , C. STREETSCAPF FRAMEWORK To improve the quality of the walking experience and give continuity to the pedestrian ways, as a continuous system, two general types'of improve- ments adjacent to the walkways are considered: 1. Open space ~ landscaping - berms. 9rass, f)owers and tree planting as a soft, calarful framework Unkage ~ alon Vtdestrian routes; and piazas and park green - spaces-as open nodes and ~ focal..points along those roubes, - ' 2. Inf111 conmercial storefronts - r ' expansion.of existing buildings, ' or new infil T development to create new commercial activity generators to gi ve street 1 i fe . and visual interest, as attrac- . tions at key locations along pedestrian routes. : 3 It is not intended 4o enclose all - • Village streets with buildings, as in - the Core Area. Nor is it desireable to leave pedestrian streets in the open • and somewhat undefined condition evident in many other areas of Yail. Rather, it is desired to have a Variety of,open and enclosed spaces, . bath built and. l.andscaped rrhich create a sb-ong framework for ` pedestrian walks as Mell as visual - interest and atti vi ty. D. STRFET EWCLOSURE Mlhile. building facade heights should ' not be uniform from bui]ding to building, they should provide a - 4" . - : "comfortable" enclosure for the . street. r • Pedestrian streets are outdoor rooms . . . whose walls are formed by the buildings. ~ The shape and feel of these 'rooms' are created by the variety of heights ` and massing (th ree-dimensional vari- ati ons ) whi ch gi ve much of the vi sual interest and pedestrian scale unique to Vail. ' Very general rules, about the perception of exterior spaces have been developed (empirically) by designers, based on the characteristics of human vision. They 'suggest that: Kan external enclosure is most --comfortable where its walls are , approximately h as high as the ~ aidth of the space enclosed; • I if the n tio fa11s to U or 1ess, the space'seems unenclosed; and . y~ . . , . if the height is greater than the _ wi dth. i t comes to resembl e a , canyon. . . ! 4 In actual application, facades are . _ seldom unifArm in height on both sides pf the street, nor is this desired. , Thus, some latitude is appropriate in the application of this h - to - 1 • ratio. Using the averaQe facade height y IL " • of bath sides Nill generally st311 be a guide fo the "comfortableness" of tfie enclosvre being created. , x ~ • ' -YtA= ¢ .'!X jo. dx . ~ ~ . : . . r. : In some instances, the 'cinyon' effect is acceptable and even desirab]e for example, as a short-connecting . linkage between larger spaces - to give variety to the walking experience. • For sun shade r / easons, it is often advantageous to orient any longer ' segments in a north-south direction. Id Long canyon streets in an east-west b 8. ' direction should generaliy be discouraged. ' _ , . When exceptions to the general height criteria occur, special design con- sideration should be given to creating pP ~ a well-defined ground floor pedestrian ~ ' . emphasis to overcome the canyon effect. ~4DlI . , Canopies, awnings, arcade and 6 building extensions can a?1 create a pedestrian focus and divert attention from upper building heights and 'canyon' effect. _ • arca ~na~~efi • For other considerations on building massing see: • Building Neight SunJ`Shade ' • ~ ' - y i ervs ' ' - Street Fdge • . . ~ - - • . _ , ~ . . ~ . $ E. STREET EDGE - Buildings in th e Yillage Core should form a strong but irregular edge to the street. ti - - Unlike many American towns there are no - standard setback requirements for buildings in Vail Yillage. Consistent with the desire for intimate pedestrian ~ scale, placement of portions of a oll ? . building at or near the property line is allowed and encouraged to give ~3• ~ ~ strong definition to the pedestrian streets. b~v This is not to imply continuous building f rontage along the property iine. A strong street edge is ~ important for continuity, but perfectly aligned facades over too long a distance tends to be ~ monotonous. With only a few exceptions in the Yillage, slightly , irregular facade lines, building ~ jogs, and 7andscape areas, give life to the street and visual interest'for pedestr.ian travel. tij . - ' Curud?near' ~}reeF~~ Where buildings 3og to create activity pocEcets, other el ements can be used to con- tinue ihe street edge: ar~~i~, g' • - low planter walls - ercades - tree pl anti ng - iaised decks b1~, - raised sidewalks -,texture changes - in ground surface ' • ' 6 Plazas, patios, green areas ere im- - portant focal points for: gathering, resting, crienting and should be ' distributed throughout the Vilinge 'With due consideration to: - spacing - sun access - - opportunities for views , - pedestrian activity See also: ` Sun/Shade Building Height • Street Enclosure Views F. BUIIDING HEIGHT Basically,.the Village Core is perceived as a mix of twa and three story facades,.although there are also four and five story buildings. 7he mix of building heights oives variety to the street--which is desirable. The height criteria are intended te encouraoe height and r:sssing variety and to discourage unifer.m building heights along the street. The dffinition of height shall be as it is in the Vail ldunicipal Cede. Building - height restrictions in Co,r.mercial Core I shall be as follows: 1. Up to 601. of the building (building coverage area) rray be built to a height of 33 fEet ar iess. 2. Ho more th3n 400 of the building (building coverage area) may be higher ' than 33 feet, but not higher than 43 feet. 3. 7ewers. spires. cupolas, chinr,eys. flagpoles, nnd similar architecturnl features not usearle as Gross Residentia7 floor Area may extend above the height limit n distance of no` more than twenty-five percent of the height limSt ncr more thnn fifteen feet. . 4. The above heights are based on an assurned 3 feet in 12 feet or 4 feet in 12 feet roof pitches. To accomnodaie and enceurage steeper roof pitches (up to 6 feet in 12 feeL), slight, proportionate height increnses could be granted.so long as the height of building side aalls is noL increased (see diagram following). . ~ • ' 1 7 - - , _ - . \ - ' ~ ~ ~ - . l ~ ~ • ~ Height af • . side • wall . does not ' • 'increase . f • . ; . s . 8 r - G. VIEWS AND FOCAL PO(NTS . Vail's mountaiNval(ey setting'is a - _ fundamental part of its identity. Views of the mountains, skt stopes, . ' creeks and other natural features . _ are reminders of the mountain environment and, by repeated : . visibility, are orientation reference points. Certain building teatures aiso provide Important.orientation references and visual focal points. The most significant view comdors have been adopted as part of Chapter 18.73 of the Vail Municipai Code. The view corridors adopted should not be considered exhaustive. When evaluating a development proposai, priority should be given to an analysis of the impact of the project on views. Views that should be preserved originate from either major pedestrian areas or public spaces, and include views of the ski mountain, the Gore Range, the Clock Tower, the Rucksack Tower and other important man-made and - - natural elements that contribute to the sense of piace associated with = Vail. These views, which have been adopted by ordinance, were ; chosen due to their significance, not only from an aesthetic standpoint, but aiso as orientation reference ~ points for pedestrians. Development in Vail Village shall not encroach into any adopted view corridor unless roved under . :::?:~;~'~.~:;.:.::~::::;:::~:::;:~:::;~;.'~'~'~:;.?:.;::i.~ ChaPter 18.73. AdoPted corridors . are listed in Chapter 18.73 ot the Vail Munlci ~ al Code. Whether P atiecbn ado ted view corridor 9 p s or . • - " . . . J - PAGE 8A not, the impact of proposed . - - development on views from pedestrian ways and public spaces must be kientif,ed and considered , y where appropriate. The Vail Land Use Plan. Town Policies, the Urban Design Guide Plans, and other i in~i,Id~?gt~~• in~iJl c(ey,~,~,,,~f • adopted master plans, shali be used ; b(xks v?ew ' ~ to help determine which views may f~O, by affected, and how 4hey should-be ~ addressed. , - (Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1992) ~ ~ 13 OX. PAG E 9 ww..e,o&M . H. SERVICE AND DELIVERY Any building expansion should = preseroe the functions of existing service alleys. ' The few service atleys that exist in . the ViIlage are extremely importarit to minimizing vehicle congestion on , pedestrian ways. The use of, and . vehicular access to, those alieys . should not be eliminated except where functional, aitematives are provided. . . In all new and remodeled - construction, delivery which avoids or reduces impacts on pedestrian ways should be explored; and adopted whenever practical, for immediate or future usage. Rear access, basement, and below- ground delivery corridors reduce congestion. Weather protection tncreases delivery efficiency substantially. Below grade delivery corridors are found in a few buildings in Vail Viliage (SitrmarWGore Creek Plaza, . Village Center, Vail Village Inn). Consideration should be given to . extending these cortidors where feasible and the creation oi new ones. As buildings are constructed or remodeled, the opportunity may . exist to develop segments of a- future system. PAGE 10 u.i... ,otioQ I. SUN/SHADE ' • ' - Due to Vatl's aipine cNmate, sun is = an important comfort factor. , especially in winter, fall and spring. r e4lSti Shade areas have ambient temperatures substantially below those of adjacent direct sunlit areas. On all but the warmest of summer days shade can easily lower temperatures below comfortable levels and thereby negatively lmpact uses of those areas. ; . All new or expanded buildings shou(d not substantially incxease the ' - ' • _ , . spring and fa(I shadow pattem (March 21 through September 23) on adjacent properties or the public R.O.W. ' 60• Z3 or in all building construction, shade sUn ave shall 'be considered m massing and t overaii height consideration. , rWQ Notwithstanding, suNshade ~ considerations are not intended to restrict building height aliowances, , but rather to influence the massing of buildings. Limited height • ~ exceptions may be granted to meet « this criteria. . , Additions to exlsting buildings may ' be created in several ways to avoid - • extending shadow patterns. ; rp ~r~s! or ~ n svn . ~ ~ , . ~ 3 ~ . . 6~ . . • - ~ ~ : . AA. PAGE 19 r . . o.wr,&Y1a _ _ . . . . _ . . _r. .W~.__.... ARCHITECTUR E/LAND S CAPE = CONSIDERATIONS . ROOFs Where visible, roofs are often Dne of the most dominant architectural elements in any bui)t environment. In the Village - roof fo nn, co7or and texture are visibly ~ dorinant, and generally consistent, ahich tends to unify the building diversity to a grea± degree. • The current expression, and objettive, - for roofs in the Viliage is to form • a consistently unifying barkdrop for the architecture and pedQStrian . . streetscape, and to avoid roofs which ' tend to stand out individually or distract visua)ly from the overal] character. • ' Roof Forms Roofs within the Yillage are typically • gable in form and of moderate-to-low . • pitch. Shed roofs are f requently used for small additions to larger buildings. Free-standing shed roofs, butterfly roofs and flat roofs, can be found in the Yillage but they are•generally considered to be o.ut of character and inapprop- riate. Hip roofs likewise are rare and genera7ly incon`sistent with the character of the Core Area,. Towers nre exceptions, in both form and . pitch, to the general.criteria, but ; - do have an established local veinacular style which should be respected. Q ' . 12 Pitch Roof slopes in the VIllage typically -1' range from 3/12 to 6/12, Nith slightly steeper pitches in limited applications. Again, for visual consistency this general 3/12-6l12 range should be Sj1L40 preserved. (See Construction below.) Overhanqs 6enerous roof overhangs are also an . established architectural feature in the Village - a traditional expression of shelter in alpine environments. Roof overh'angs typically range from 3 to 6 feet on all edges. Specific design consideration should be given ~ to protection of pedestrian ways . adjacent to buildings. Tee falls, snow slides, and runoff hazards can . . be reduced by roof orientation, gutters, arcades, etc. ~ Overhang details are treated with varying degrees of ornamentation. - Structural elements such as roof beams • are expressed beneath the overhangs, simply or decoratively carved. The ~ roof fascia is thick and wide, giving Ya~ ~+y a substantial edge to the roof. erYo~ Compositions The intricate roofscape of the Yillage as a whole is the result of many in- dividual simple roof configurations. For any single building a varied but - simple comPosition of roof planes is preferred to either a single or a complex arrangement of many roofs. As ja,,9c suv~ rwf P?~,e ff~ ~»r~ individual roofs become more complex the roof attracts visual attention away from the streapbusnde rtotal: ather roofscape tends toward Yness . Lhan a backdrop composition. , 4plia rw{ - ' Pl~eS 13 _ Stepped Roofs As buildings are stepped to reflect exis'ting grade changes, resulting roof steps should be made where the height change will.be visually significant. _ Yariations which are too subtle appear tb De more stylistic than functional, • and out of character with the more- straight-f.orward roof design typical in the Village. WK. Materials wood-shakes, Nood shingles, and built- up tow and gravel are almost exclusivel~ used as roof materials in the Village. (See Construction below.) For visual. ~ consistency any other materials should have the appearance of the abave. . Construction Comnon roof problems and design con- siderations in this climate include: - snowslides onto pedestrian walks - gutters freezing - roof dams and wnter infiltration - heavy snow loads Careful attention to these functional details is recomnended, as well as - familiarity with the local building code, proven construction detnils, and town ordinances.. . For built-up roofs, pitches of 4/12 . or steeper do not hold gravel well. For shingle roofs, pitches of 4/12 or shallower often result in ice dnms and backflow lenkage under the shingles. . , 14 Co1d-roof construction is strongly , prefefired, unless warm-raof benefits a~r~{ for a specific application can be ~!r liWt . demonstrated. Cold-roofs are double- roofs which insulate and prevent snow ~JYc~ mel t. from i nternal bui l ding heat. Sy - retaining snow on the roof, many of the problems listed can be Peduced. Perio'dic snow removal will be required - and should be anticipated in the,. ~ J19Mst . design. : . vcA ir*4~ a wc+G?tl~e Roof gutters tend to ice-in completely tu~ r~a a~ air - and becane ineffective in the Vail ~Ks~drs~ climate, especially in shaded north- side locations. Heating the interior gnIW 0Afic-M"'r circumferenee with heat-tape elements - or other devices is generally nec- essary to assure adequate runoff control in colder months. 15 ~ FACADES Materials - Stucco, brick, wood (and glass) are the primary building materials found in the , - _ YilTage. Whiie aot wishing to restrict , design freedom over-much, existing - tonditions show that within this small range of materials asuch variation and - individuality are possible wfiile pre- • serving a basic hamny. Too many diverse materials weaken the continuity and repetition which unifies the street- scape. - Of the above materials,stucco is the most consistently used material. Most of the buildings in the Village exhibit some stucco, and there are virtually no areas where stucco is • . , entirely absent. It is intended to preserve the dominance of stucco-by its use in portions, at least, of all new facades, and by assuring that other materials are not used to the exclusion of stucco in any sub-area within the Village. = - Color _ There is greater 7atitude in the use of color in the Village, but still a discernible consistency within a general range of colors. for wood surfaces, trim or siding, darker color tones are preferred - Drowns, greys, blue-greys, dark o7ive, slate-greens, etc. Stucco colon are generally light - white, beige, pale-gold, or other light pastels. Other light colors could be appropriate, as considered on a case-by-case basis. Bright colors (red, orange, blues, maroon, etc.) should be avoided for maJor wall planes, but can be used effectively (with restraint) for decorative trim, wnll raphics, and . other accent elements isee E. Accent Elements) 16 Generally, to avoid both "busyness", snd weak visual interest, the variety of I major wall colors (and materials ° • I excluding glass) should not exceed fou r plii 'f I nor be less than two. : . , A color/material change between the ' . _ ground floor and upper floors is a _ . comnon and effective reinforcement of the pedestrian scale of the street. Transparency Pedestrian scale is created in many ways, but a major factor is the openness, attractiveness, and generally public - character of the ground floor facade of adjacent buildings.\ Transparent - store fronts are "people attractors , opaque or solid walls are more private, imply "do not approach". - On pedestrian-oriented streets such as uP~er la~r5 Prr~a~+tnak~7 i n the Vi 11 age, ground fl oor commerci al 3 ~ dPaqoe wjW,,4AoP PW??r,~v facades are proportionately more trans- us• , parent than upper f]oors. Upper floors are typcially more residential, private , - and thus less open. M ! '~r~,Kd ~fax's PrQda?r,?~.fcl7 g tar ruls?H81~ percm?.~eqc _ of °P'4Je r?wfenaLs• :XY 3 xx- ~d 1? ' As a measure of transparency, the most . characteristic and successful ground = floor fncades range from 55% to 70% q ~ 55%w7~°~o of the total length of_the commercial f a c a d e. U p p e r f l o o r s n r e o f t e n t h e converse 30%-45% transparent. . - - - , Examples of transparency (lineal -feet of glass.to lineal feet ~ MK of facade) on ground level. - Covered Bridge Bldg. 58% , - Pepi's Sports 71% ~ - Gasthof Gramshartmer 48% ' - The Lodge 66% - Golden Peak House 62% - Casino Building 30% ' - - Gorsuch Building 51% Windows , In addition to the general degree of transparency, window details are an important source of pedestrian sca]e- , giving elements. ' . The si2e and shape of windows are often a response to the function of the street adjacent. For close-up, casual pedestrian viewing windows are typically sized.to human-siZed dimensions and characteristics of human vision. (Large glass-wall store- ~ . fronts suggest uninterrupted viewing, as • from a moving car. The sense of intimate pedestrian scale is diminished.) Ground floor display windows are typical]y raised slightly 18 feet f and do not extend much over 8 feet above th.e +val k- 'way level. Ground gloors which are noticeably above or below grade are exceptions. " r ~bN ~ : : : : Sriv:',•::v'~r.•'.~:~:~:: v : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .u~:~•frw.•: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : 17•A The a rti cul8ti on of the window i tsel f is still another element in giving , rec ~lar pedestrian scale (human-related dimensions). G1 ass areas are usual ly subdi vi ded to , ; tevtccal - express individual window elements - and are further-subdivided by mullions into small panes - which is responsible for much of the old-world charm, of the Yilinge. Similarly, windoNs are most often clustered in banks, 3uxtaposed with = plain wall surfaces.to give a pleasing ' rhythm. Horizontal repetition of single window elements, especially over long El o distances, should be avoided. Large single pane wirtdows occur in the Village, and provide some contrast, as long as they are generally consistent in form w ith other wi ndows . Long continuous glass is out of character. . :vs • . r;.; • •::~:::r s::::~ ` ~ Bay, bow and box windows nre comnon window details, ahich further vnciety and massing to facades - and are encouraged. I ' bow hox , Reflective glnss, plastic panes, and aluminum or other metal frames are not consistent in the Village and should _ be avoided. Metal-clad or plastic----. clad wood frames, having the appearance of painted aood have been used success- ful)y and are acceptable. - Doors ' Like windows, doors are important-to ' character and scale-giving architectural elements. They should also be somewhat transparent (on retail commercial facades) and eonsistent in detailing with windows and other facade elements. Doors with glass contribute to overal7 facade transparencye Due to the ~ visibility of people and merchandise at I~,,t ~,~~8~a~ inside, windowed doors.are somewhat more effecti ve i n drawi ng . peopl e i nsi de o arf~cutatu! Svrfaz to retail con~nercial facades. Although great variations exist, 25-30% t , transparenty is felt to be a minimum transparency objective. Private residences, lodges, restnurants, and other non-retail establishments have different visibility and character needs, and doors should be designed accordingly. Sidelight windows are also a means of introducing door- transparency as a camplement or sub- stitute for door'windows. , ' 19. ; % ' . • F • Articulated doors have the decorative quality desired for Vai]. Flush doors, 1 i ght al umi num frames, pl asti c appl i que elements all are considered inappropriate. ~ fira?~e ~ 00 p~a~el 13 ? _ ~ rr?r"fo1 p h • ~ var, k ~ I~ ~ra?,nG I - NOTE: Security is an important design consideration in Vail. Dead- bolt locks are encouraged. Locks, door handles and glass should all be designed to discourage break-ins. , Security-design discussions with the Town police staff are encouraged. As an expression o4 entry, and sheltered,v+elcome, protected entry- ways are encouraged. Ooorrrays may be recessed, extended, or covered. . rs6errKd e~c~er~Cd ~oul~r~'d . . . 20 Trim _ • Prominent wood trim is also a unifying , . . feature in the Yillage. Particularly ~ i at ground floor levels, doors and windows have stron o contrasting (see Color-Facades~ framin el g ements, _ which tie the various elements together in one composition. Windoars and doors are treated as strong visual features. Glass=wall detailing for either is typically avoided. • _ 21 . , ~ - . DECKS AND PATIOS -Dining decks and patios, wtien properly • designed and sited, bring people to the streets, opportunities-to_look and be looked at, and generally contribute - to the liveliness of n busy street- . . , making a richer pedestrian experience than if those strteets were empty. ' A review of successful decks/patios - in Vail reveals several carmon ch8r- acteristics: •b~l~~~( ~r bl~.. ~~~'~~N~ . ' • en~~~ bpa~.e , - direct sunlight from 11:00 - 3:00 , . i ncrea'ses use by many days/year Vm~f~~l3 pr of%r ~lvtiN and protects from wi nd -~r GDbY aNj, y4316 - el evated feet to gi ve vi ews •~~y~~~ ~=l~tite ~ ' into the.pedestrian walk (and not the reverse) - physical separation from pedestrian ~ walk of to (planter better than a wall) • ~9 ~ , ~i~, . ' ! 7 - overhang gives pedestrian scale/ q ~ , shelter. dl o , J Deck.s and patios should be sited and designed with due consideration to: 5#~ IGf{~ 1'~• - sun - views - wind - pedestrian activity ' . , 22 , • - BaLcorviEs . Balconies occur on-almost all Duildings in the Village which have at least a second level facade aall. As strong repeti ti ve features they: -.9{ve scale to buildings. - ~ - give life to the street (when used) - add variety to building foms - provide shelter to pathways below. ' . . The prominance of baicony forms is due ~ . to several fairly caman characteristics: ~ . _ ` . Color , They contrast in color (dark) with the • • • • . bui l di n, typi cal ly matchi ng the trim . . d~'k ~'d' ~ colors ~see Facade-Colorj. ' " , ~?9kf Hud~~_ ' • h~lk~rcr.tr~~ 5 i ze ~Ita~y ~r~tr~dPs 7hey extend far enough from the building 's~, ~n - to cast a prominent shadow pattern. ' Balconies in Vail are functional as well as decorative. As such, they should be of useable size and locnted to encourage use. 8alconies iess than six feet deep are seldom used, nor are those always in shade, not oriented to views or street life. Mass • - ~ . . • ~-ek~reY fs bc heav as~! or They are cornr~only massive yet semi-trans- • ~ ~uf parent, distinctive from.the building, . . ~ yet a1loKing the buflding to be somewhat ~ ~ U15rbrli~ . visib7e behind. Solid balconies are •~,r~~, ls found occasionallyfl and tend to be too / ,~m~Qry~~tt dominant obscuring the building archi- tecture. Light ba1 conies 1 nck the visual impact which ties the Village . . . together. ~ W 0,11 ~ _ ~ ht~!-t0 ToD Ltbi~j. 2 ~ ' . . ; • . i . ~ Materials Wood balconies are by far the most ~uc~ per,els comnon. Vertical structural members are the most dominant visually, often ~ decoratively sculpted.. Decorative ~ wrought iron balconies are also . - consistent visualiy where the vertical members are close enough to create semi-transparency. Pipe rails, and ' plastic, canvas or glass panels shou]d bg avoided. Wra~k} lrA~t Construction Cantilevered beams, beams extended to support the balcony, are most often visibly exposed on the underside of balconies. As such they are an expression of structure and tie the - balconies to the building visually. , otTtoom of sfi'uv,furd 24 . ~ • • . ACCENT ELEMENTS The 1'ife, and festive quality of the - Village is given by judicious use of - accent elements which give col,or, movement and contrast to the Village. Colorful accent elements consistent with . , existing character aPe encouraged, such , as: Awnings and canopies - canvas, bright - color or stripes of two colors. , Flags, banners - hanging from buildings, poles, and even across streets for special occasions. Umbrellas - over tables on outdoor . patios. Annual color flowers - in beds or in planters. Accent lighting - buildings, plazas, windows, trees (even Christmas - ' lights all winter).• , Painted wall graphics - coats of arms, symbols, accent compositions, etc. Fountains - sculptural, with both winter and surrmer character. 25 LANDSCAPE ELEMEtVTS Landscape considerations include, but go beyond, the placement of appropriate plant materials. Landscape considerations incl ude: - plant materials - paving - - retaining walls - - street furniture (benches, kiosks, trnsh, etc.) . - lighting _ - signage ~ ?lant Materials Opportunities for planting are not extensive in the Village, which places a premium on the plant selection and design of the sites that do exist. Framework planting of trees and shrubs should include both deciduous and evergreen species for year round - continuity and interest. NativQ plants are somewhat limited in varie.ty, but are clearly best able to Nithstand the harsh winter climate, and to tie the Village visually with its mountain setting. Some typical local plant materials include: Trees Narrow-leaf cottonwood Salsam poplar Aspen . Lodgepole pine Colorado spruce Subalpine fir, . _ , Shrubs 31111 ow Dogwood Serviceberry Alpine currant Chokecherry Mugho pine Potenti l.l a Buffaioberry 26 ` Pavin Tfi e freeze/thaw cycle at this altitude . virtually eliminates common site-east concrete as a paving surface (concrete spall). High-strength concrete may work in selected conditions. Asphalt . brick (on concrete or on sand), and concrete block appear to be best suited to the area. ` In general, paving treatments should be ~ coordinated with that of the public R.O.W: adjacent. The Town uses the ' follo+ring materials for all new tonstruction: - asphalt - general use pedestrian streets - brick on concrete - feature areas ' (plazas, intersections, fountains, etc.). Retaining Walls Retaining walls to raise planting area often protetts the landscape from pedestrians and snowplows, and should " provide seating opportunities: Two types of material are already well- established in the Yillage and should be utilized for continuity. - split-face moss rock reneer - Village Core pedestrian streets . (typical) . - rounded cobble hidden mortar - in open space areas if above type . not already established nearby. (example: Toan of Vail entry wall) Wood retaining walls nre strongly dis- couraged due to deterioration caused by the harsh climate. They may be _ effectively used with appropriate . . . detailing to resist rot and express crafted joint conditions. 27 ~ ` . ~ . ~ f~ . , Lighting Light standards should be ceordinated , . with those used by the Town in*the public R.O.W._ Si na e Refer to Town of Yafil Signage Ordinance. ~ Colorful annuals are used in key locations throughout the Yilinge to - accent pedestrian areas, highlight building entries, and as plaza focii. ' 7hese color accents can be provided in: - retained planting beds • - flower boxes ' - hanging pots, baskets - ground beds ~ - , • 28 . ~ • ' SERVtCE Trash handling is extremely sensitive ' in'a pedestrian environment: Trash collection is primarily made in off- peak hours. It is the building owners responsibility to assure that - existing trash storage problems are . ~ ~ corr.ected and futu.r.e ones avoided. CA'1Qi duw~ps~r cridrd ~W • ~ ~nin. tn~k,a~ct?vau~g ~ udjorrl~t t~lildi?~ Garbage, especially from food service establishments must be carefully • . considered, including: quantities generated . - pick-up frequency/access - container sizes - enclosure location/design • - visual, odor impacts Garbage collection boxes or dumpsters must be readily accessible for'col- lection at all times yet fully screened from public view - pedes- trians as well as upper level windows in Lhe vicinity. . . Materials • • Exterior materials for garbage en- -Tcrtaw4 fvm ed. da2,, Lie closures should be consistent with or,a4j.rrUarrl Q~~n7 that of adjacent buildings. ~ a Construction ' • !in 4r ' . Durabi 1 ity of the structure and oper- - tt=A -O'i?u ability of doors in all weather are prime concerns. Metal frames and posts . behind the preferred exterior materials : . . • . should be considered to withstand the inevitable abuse these structures suffer. 29 MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk DATE: May 11, 1994 RE: Appointments to the Local Licensinq Authority Terms for pon White and Mitzi Gimenez on the Local Licensing Authority expire June 1, 1994, and Don White is re-applying. Don was initially appointed in June of 1993, and his attendance records for each of his present appointment is as follows: Present Absent 06/92 - 06/94 29 3 u 1y TOWN OF VAIL From the desk of... Michelle Caster CLG~ Oul-j v APR 1 9 1994 Amy Fritz ' PO Box 356 V a i 1, C o 81658 476-5843 April 19,1994 To Vail Town Council Members: At this time I would like to be considered as a candidate to fill a vacant seat on the Liquor Licensing Board. I grew up in Vail and have an intimate knowledge of the resort. After I graduated from college, I returned to Vail and continued to accumulate experience in the local service industry. I have both a working knowledge of the law and a vested interest in maintaining its upkeep. I have recently purchased a home in Vail and I will continue to make Vail my permanent residence. My desire to become a member of the board stems from an interest in becoming more involved with the community I live in and the industry in which I work. I look forward to interviewing with you in May. Sincerely, . Amy ' z ~ C4) Yn I~C,w+C~l Dh Ed May 10, 1994 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Town Coumcil Members: Please accept this letter as an egpression of my interest in a position with the Town of Vail Liquor Authority. I have resided in the Vail Valley for the past eight years and during this time have hacl the opportunity to become involved with numerous issues affecting our community. Servgng as a member of the Vail Liquor Authority would further this involvement and would be a constructive way for me to - share my great interest in the growth as well as preservation of our community. I feel my contributions to the Vail Liquor Authority could be estremely beneficial to all involved. My employment as a personal assistant to another longtime Vail Valley resident allows me the freedom to devote significant amounts of time to projects I feel are worthwhile. I believe this position is of great importance to our community and would welcome the chance to offer my ideas and opinions concerning issues facang the Board. I wish to become a member of the Vail Liquor Authority as an upstanding and active citizen of the Vail Valley. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elizabeth Pickett 1 ° ~ ; ~ 'ols 304 BRIDGE STREET o VAIL, COLORADO 81657 TOCO FA(;T ,n (303) 476-7623 • 800-554-1546 a FAX 479-9980 ~ 27 Aoril 1994 Town of Vai1 75 South Frontage Road Vail. CO 82657 TO WHOM IT MA.Y CONCERN: Re: Membership Licer.sing Authoritv I have served for the past 2 years as a member of the Vail Licensing Authority Board and would like to continue to do so for anothQr 2 vears. Sincerely, 0 0,-.j~ Don White ~ MEMORANDUM ~ TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 17, 1994 SUBJECT: Summary of conditions of approval to be placed on the subdivision plat.for the Pedotto rezoning. ;;•1:;.::;:::,:.::•.:•:;~•:•~:•;:•x•»:•tit:•:::...:;•:.. ~~a:•:;;:,••::~•. . v:::•:::•::;;;~::::•::;.>:.::.::a::.::;.::::.: ~:a:•:;•::•:;;;.:;;:;~::.::;;;•>:;;;•: ~;:;a::;;.,>:.::;~:a:.::.:;.::•:;•>::a:;•:;:•:::•::•:::;;::; ti...;+:.:::: .........................................,.............1 ..ti.............~..:t..~....:.:...::..:.....~:.,....,........... . ~ ~ ~ <~;r:~>:: ....,~::.,.ti,,.,:,,~,~,. •:>ti::::. v.,~ •,•~w~ ;+:y;;~;;>::•?'•. . . J: ~'•:::;i:: i:•:•:t..:•:•t:.i:::'v: i>:;::.?::.:: . :•t:\:;~ ~ t:•t:a:~:,~> .:?::o::::;•>?i: . . . . . . i!:::<a:::..:.: ::?a?:....\ a ...\.a~•~~.».\~....,~:.»~::.:•::.~~:::•::•>:•:. , ~...:::y;:;;:;:;:~i:±'+•:•rr::>„~:., ~ • a•:1.:.,•:::: • ...:~•.t. • , . ,.,:+:+;t~~:cr:r:::~~.. . , •,cx. ; ~.:•.o: ...~.:>:::~v•:::::~::,,~...:>:::.,.»,....::,::.,-...k., ,4.,,,.p,o-~,•:;.;;::::>~w::;~~..~.w...,. . ? .,p: ..........,:..,a.:...... \a\.:.......~.,::.._....•.... Staff has summarized all of the conditions which have been discussed pertaining to the Pedotto rezoning. These are to be placed on the subdivision plat which will be in effect only if the rezoning is approved. Conditions 1 through 10 were recommended by the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). Conditions 11 through 14 were included by Town Council at first reading. Condition 15 is a detailed listing of landscaping requirements referred to in earlier conditions. Please note that the text in bold reflects the changes made by the PEC. ~ 1. The developer shall submit the subdivision plat, site plan, and recording fees to the Town prior to issuance of any building permit for a structure on this property. The plat and site plan shall include the plat restrictions listed below and all future development shall conform to these. ~ a. All construction shall conform to the standards listed below and shall comply with the building footprints shown on the attached site plan. b. There must be a minimum 15 foot separation between structures, including all decks and cantilevered portions, but excluding eaves. After the construction of the first structure and prior to any subsequent building permit applications, the applicant must provide survey information verifying the location of previously built structures to show that the 15 foot separation requirement shall be met given the . construction of the proposed unit(s). c. The height limitation for the development on this parcel shall be lowered from the 38 feet allowed by LDMF zoning to 33 feet. d. All driveways to be constructed on this site shall not exceed 8% slope. e. GRFA, site coverage and height shall be allocated for the structures as follows: 1 ` Building Total GFlFA Envelope # Dwelling Units Credit GRFA Ailowed Ske Coverage Height 1 2 450 sq, h. 2,080 sq. ft. 2,530 sq. ft. 1,800 sq. ft. 33 ft. 2 1 225 sq, ft. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 3 1 225 sq, ft. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 4 1 225 sq. ft. t,425 sq. fl. 1,650 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 5 2 450 sq, ft. 1,680 sq. R. 2,130 sq. ft. 1,683 sq, ft. 33 ft. 6 1 225 sq. h. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 7 1 225 sq. ft. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 8 2 450 sq. ft. 1,680 sq, ft. 2,130 sq. ft. 1,683 sq. ft. 1 33 ft. 9 1 225 sq. ft. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq. h. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 10 ~1 225 sq. ft. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq, ft. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 11 2 450 sq. ft. 1,680 sq. ft. 2,130 sq, h. 1,683 sQ. ft. 33 ft. 12 1 225 sq. ft. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 ft. 13 1 225 sq. ft. 1,425 sq. ft. 1,650 sq. h. 1,400 sq. ft. 33 h. 14 2 450 sq. ft. 1,680 sq. ft. 2,130 sq. i1. ' 1,683 sq. h. 33 R. f. No fences shall be allowed on this property. ~ g. Phasing - The applicant shall provide the employee housing units according to the phases shown below. i. Prior to the issuance of a final CO or TCO for any of the first six structures constructed in lnnsbrook Meadows, the applicant shall _ secure a final Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the first of three deed restricted employ"ee housing units. ii. Prior to requesting a final CO or TCO for any of the seventh through tenth structures constructed in Innsbrook Meadows, the applicant shall secure a final CO or TCO for the second of three deed restricted EHU for the development. iii. Prior to requesting a final CO or TCO for any of the eleventh through fourteenth structures constructed in Innsbrook Meadows, the applicant shall secure a final CO or TCO for the third of three deed restricted employee housing units. 2. The developer shall have the Environmental Assessment updated and shall have any required amendment to the site plan presented to the PEC for their review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permit on this property. 2 , • , , 4. The driveways serving Building Footprint #1 shall be modified to reduce the length by shifting the curb cut to the west. The Town Community Development staff and the Town Engineer must approve the change prior to any DRB hearing for any dwelling unit on this property. 5. The existing aspens located to the west of the green space area in the center of the site shall be transplanted or replaced on a 1:1 ratio based on the caliper of the existing trees. For example, and eight inch caliper tree would have to be replaced with two 4 inch caliper trees. Staff believes this is reasonable since larger trees do not transplant well according to the Town's Landscape Architect. 6. Staff may approve up to 10 foot shifts in building footprint location from those shown on the plan approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission on February 28, 1994 or April 11, 1994 as long as the 15 foot separation between the units is maintained. 7. The applicant shall provide a minimum garage area within each structure of 480 square feet. 8. The applicant shalt amend the site plan and subdivision plat according to the Public Works and Fire Department comments listed below. These changes shall be done prior to any DRB hearing for any dwelling unit on this site. Fire Department A. The fire access easement on the southwest corner of the site must be defined and then recorded at the Caunty C1erk and Recorder prior to DRB approval of any dwelling unit if a common access on the southwest corner of the site is provided. The easement must be posted in field with "No Parking" signs. Staff will allow the site plan reviewed by the PEC on February 28, 1994 or the site plan revised on April 11, 1994 to be constructed.. B. All driveway surfaces must be "all weather driving surfaces." C. Hydrants must be installed according to Town of Vail standards. 3 . Public Works A. Detailed regrading and landscape plans for the sidewalk and right-of- way area must be provided prior to a DRB hearing for any dwelling units. The Town Engineer is requiring a hard surtace sidewalk, curb, gutter, storm sewer, inlets, engineering drawings and/or grading plans to be provided by the developer. The Town Engineer must approve all engineering drawings for public improvements prior to any DRB hearing for any dwrelling unit on this property. The construction of the curb and gutter, storm drainage infrastructure, sidewalk and . -any other required public improvement shall be installed prior to the issuance of a TCO or CO for the sixth structure within the development. _ B. Easements must be dedicated for the sidewalks, drainage, utilities, road side ditches, streetlights, etc. prior to a DRB hearing for any dwelling unit: 9. Either site plan, the one reviewed by the PEC on February 28, 1994 or the one reviewed by fhe PEC on April 11, 1994 may be constructed by the appticant. 10. Approval of the minor subdivision shall be contingent on approval of the rezoning. 11. No 250 square foot additions shall be allowed for any dwelling unit on this parcel. 12. A homeowner's association shall be established prior to the issuance of a TCO to insure maintenance of the common area. 13. The deed restrictions for th'e three employee housing units shall include • language requiring the units to be rented, and requires that the rental rate be comparable to market rates. 14. The maximum GRFA allowed on this site shall be 25,900 square feet. 15. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the building . envelopes listed below, the applicant shall provide landscaping according to the quantity shown in the table below: 4 ~ , Building Envelope Quanttty oi Landscaping Caorwral Location # 1 5 aspen north of envelope 1 5 aspens, t spruce southwest of envelope 2 2 spruce north of envelope 2 5 aspens, 1 spruce southwest of envelope 3 5 aspens north of envelope 4 1 spruce east of envelope 5 7 spruce north of envelope ' 5 and 6 the equivalent of 66 inch caliper of aspen generally around envelopes 5 and 6 (2 inch minimum per tree) 7 4 aspen east of envelope 8 no landscaping required by PEC 9 3 aspen north of envelope 10 11 aspen southeast of envelope 11 7 aspen east of envelope 12 1 spruce west of envelope 13 6 aspen east of envelope 14 5 aspen east of envelope 14 8 aspen north of envelope 14 1 spruce northwest of envelope C'wQd+narosOaaono.aoi , 5 f ~ ORDINANCE NO. 5 SERIES OF 1994 AN ORDINANCE REZONING A TRACT FROM PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESiDENT1AL, SECTION 18.13 TO LOW DENSaTY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SECTION 18.16 GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2850 KINNICKINNICK ROAD MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS: A parcel of land in the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, more particulariy described as follows: Beginning at a point whence a brass cap set for a witness comer for the West Quarter of said Section 14, bears (North 29 degrees 28 minutes 51.9econds West, 1073.08 feet Deed) (North 43 Degrees 15 minutes 02 seconds West, 915.96 feet Measured); Thence North 74 degrees 05 minutes 19 seconds East, 10.76 feet; Thence 183.62 feet along the arc of e curve to the right which are subtends a chord bearing North 88 degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds East, 181.76 feet; Thence South 77 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds Eest, 62.77 feet; Thence 147.43 feet along the arc of a curve to the left which are subtends a chord bearing North 86 degrees 36 minutes 17 seconds East, 145.60 feet; Thence North 70 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds East, 406.55 feet; Thence 54.10 feet along the arc of a curve to the right which ere subtends a chord bearing South 47 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds Eest, 44.20 feet; Thence South 14 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds West, 110.51 feet; Thence South 68 degrees 18 minutes 91 seconds West, 320.00 feet; Thence North 19 degrees 07 minutes 05 seconds West, 50.00 feet; Thence South 77 degrees 48 minutes 41 seconds West, 160.18 feet; Thence South 10 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds West, 36.48 feet; Thence North 87 degrees 40 minutes 06 seconds West, 337.72 feet; Thence (North 11 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds East, 130.00 feet Deed) North 11 degrees 55 minutes 31 seconds East, 129:75 feet Measured) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Bearing from G.L.O. record for South half of Section line between Sections 14-15. (G.LO. record South 01 degrees 30.2 minutes East) (South 01 degrees 38 minutes 32 seconds East Measured) WHEREAS, the property located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road has been replatted to a single lot from an unplatted parcel in accordance with Section 17.20.030; and WHEREAS, an application has been submitted to rezone the lot from Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediate adjacent properties; WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental Commission had a public hearing on the proposed zoning amendment and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and . WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to plat restrictions which shall be recorded on the plat at the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder prior to second reading which stipulate how the future development shall occur; and WHEREAS, all notices required by Section 18.66.080, have been sent to the ~ appropriate parties; and Vti'H~~~AS, the Tdwn C.Founcil has heid a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: - ordinanee No. s, Series of 1994 4 Section 1 The Town Councii finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in Chapter 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied, and all of the requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments have been fully satisfied. Section 2 ° . The Town Council hereby rezones the property from Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family Residential. Section 3 _ If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, ctauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 4 The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 5 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 6 All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. Ordinance No. 5, s.r;oe m 1994 ~ INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL ON FIRST READING this day of , 1994, and a public hearing shall be held on the day of , 1994, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. , Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of . 1994. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: . Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD94.5 Ordlnance No. 5, s.rieo m 1994 ~ R . April 19, 1994 Town Council The Town of Vail 75 S: Frontage Road West Vail, Co 81657 RE: Pedotto Parcel Rezoning , \I The Pedotto parcel is being presented for your review and approval for rezoning. The proposal shows 14 buildings They are being presented as affordable housing for young families at approximately $315,000 for each home; but we feel that this is somewhat out of the range of most young families and that, in fact, these homes will become second homes. As a result we will have additional non-resident owners. While we do not object to non-resident owners, we would like to see InterMountain remain the last bastion of local ownership in the Vail Valley. At this time the majority of the people who live in InterMountain are local and we feel that retaining primary/secondaryzoning will maintain this permanent resident nature of this neighborhood. Although the present zoning allows for six primary/secondary duplexes on 6 15,000 sq. ft. lots; we feel that the size of these buildings would be more in keeping with the surrounding area which consists of townhomes and condominiums than 14 small alpine buildings that do not fit into the architecture of the neighborhood. As residents of InterMountain we would like to ask that you deny this request for rezoning. We are very much aware that this area will be developed and we have tried to give our input. It is of utmost concern to the residents of this neighborhood that a formal traffic study be undertaken to actually laiow the amount of traffic that is evident in this area. Seven road cuts off of K:innikinnick, which presently has an exceptional amount of traffic seems to only add to the danger of negotiating the streets in InterMountain. , With all due respect, Residents of Vail/InterMountain K ~ . PETTTION TO TOWN COUNQL We, the undersigaed residents of InterMountain Subdivision, request that the members of the V: Town Council leave the zoni.ng on the Pedotto Site at Primary/Secondary, rathez than approving upzoning this parcel and the proposed subdivision, to Low Densiry Multi-Family: NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHYSICAL ADDRESS TELEPHONE ~ ~wur IOL 7 Z Po ! s.i* e 9 76 - 2 Z gZ.-I .,~,1•~. ~r' ~ `~ct ~~1 4 -3(,~ ~L,I ~t ; ; s f, D K 9 ~ ~ , . y 1/a c, iSc~-;s u) Y7,- _4i ' rV\1-w ' ~ , ~ 97b s^rf r r .i 1 .I 4 I I `"7u ! •f ' 4- ` -14;i „ ~ T6-s~o ; ' - < ~ • . PETTITON TO TOWN COUNCII, We, the undersigned residents of InterMountain Subdivision, request that the members of the Va Town Counol leave the zoni.ng on the Pedotto Site at Primary/Secondary, rather than approving upzoning c this pazcel and the proposed subdivision, to Low Density Multi-Faznily: NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHYSICAL ADIIRESS TELEPHONE # , • ~ , ~ 6 . - u . 7~- ~ . . , J/Si7 74- i 33 7°~ 60 351 3 VAI L #3 41 7ce Z Q~ 00 1. 7(0 ' 2S2 ~ 6r~7,NG 476 1610 . tfT 1 !ki, Wktn 7 . "kihfir Cy~' 6- 0 y ~ 1 . PE'ITI'ION TO TOWN COUNCII, We, the undersigned residents of InterMountain Subdivision, request that the membess of the Va Town Council leave the zoning on the Pedotto Site at Primary/Secondary, rather than approving upzoning c this parcel and the proposed subdivision, to Low Density Multi-Faznily: NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHYSICAL ADDRESS TELEPHONE # ~cO k~~,., i~ ~~l,.L. (~S-`~ •Pi~j~ Q5~ V1~lL rv ~ 41 (a -3-7 -~3 3 ' C~?1v~~ ~',,~w'c~c . 11(YV'11 ~-1! 1C,i (1V1 UC I~1't1~ ~ i3 i~ 1(G' ~ I`-i~vuEr~ (w'. ',QL bCj&L , ?~n~ t ti~~i~k :MM CCOK- 4-.)N l NN IU9-% (<A4A[-:) ~ lJ .SC~ ?'1 ~ ~c i rl S a?o, 3~xs.-~3 V; I v i~~nn,•c.&;nn~~.t~ LI-7 ~ a 10, 1 _ 4 c.._ _ . ~~l ~ ~ /~I i~err~~ ~ ~ , k • . 1~~~ ~7~-,i~p..~ tr.si~~ -JWIS , / , / jaa2 ' 3rd May, 1994 Dear Vail Town Councilperson: • I have been a bit overwhelmed recently by all of the irons I have in the fire so didn't get the telephone calls made that I would have liked to make. I hope you will have time to read this note, then, before making a decision on Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1994 (rezoning of Pedotto parcel). While Ernie and I are not as affected by the rezoning as some of our neighbors may be, we do feel that the number of buildings planned for the Pedotto Parcel is out of porportion with the near neighborhood. True, there are a number of condominium and townhouse projects across the street to the north of this parcel, but most of the homes to the right, left, and behind the property (except for The Camelot) are single family or primary/secondary homes. The ambiance of the area will certainly be lost. Now when one crosses the bridge one appears to be driving into the forest; if this project is allowed and completed, one might as well be driving into a Denver Subdivision. Some of my younger neighbors are concerned as to what the completion of this project might do to real estate taxes. While we are in a position to handle an increase, many of the young families who have recently purchased in the neighborhood, while prices were down and interest rates low, may be very much affected. Their ability to make the payments may be marginal, and they may be forced out of the area down valley. , We would really hate to see this happen as we feel we need young families in this end of the valley; they are,Vail's future. Thank you for your time. I respectfully request that you consider all of the ramifications of allowing a rezoning of this parcel before you make your decision. Siricly, . =1y~~ ~ .9'0 Brown ' MEMORANDUM TO: , Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department ~ DATE: April 11, 1994 SUBJECT: A request for a minor subdivision and a request to rezone a tract from. Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Roadlmore specifically described as. follows: A parcel of land in the Southnrest puarter ot Section 14. Township 5 Sou1h. Range 81 West of the 6th Pnndpal Mendian. mae puticularly descnbed as fdbws: Beginning at a poim whanee a brasa cap sat for a witnass oorrwr fa the Wast (]uanar of said Seetion 14, baars (North 29 dayraes 28 minutes 51 seconds Wast, 1073.08 }aat pood) (North 43 pegraas 15 minutas 02 aeconds West. 915.96 feet Measured); Thenoe Nprth 74 degtees Q5 minules 19 seoonds Eatt, 10.76 feet; Thenee 183.62 feet along the arc of a curve to the rgM which are subtends a chord bearinp North 88 daprees 12 minutas 30 seCOnds East. 181.76 feet; ThenGe South 77 degrees 40 miruJtes 21 se0ond6 Eest. 6277 feet: TAenCe 147.43 feet along Me arc of a curve to the leh which are subtends a chord bearinQ North 86 dagrees 36 minutes 17 seCOnds EaSt, 115.60 feet; Thence North 70 degrees 52 minules 55 9eCOrbs East, 406.55 feet: ThenCe 54.10 feeT along the arc of a wrve to the rigM which are subtends a chord bwring South 47 dagreas 20 minutes 37 aecontls East, 4420 teet; Thence South 14 degraas 25 mirnrtos 50 seaonds West, 11051 feet; Thence South 68 degiees 18 mmutes 91 seconds VYsst. 320.00 teet: . Thence Nortli 19 degreas 07 minutes OS aeoontla Wost. 50.00 fest Thence South 77 degrees 18 mirunea 41 escaWs Wes4 160.18 feet; Thenee South 10 degrees 53 mmutes 33 aeconds West. 36.48 feet; • Thence North 87 degrees 40 mmutes 06 seconds West, 337.72 feet; Thenee (North 11 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds East, 130.00 feet Deed) North 11 degraes 55 minLaes 31 seoonds East, 129.75 feet AAeasured) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Beanng hom G.LO. reaord for South hal} of Seetion Gne betwaen Seqiony 14-15. (G.LO. record South 01 degrees 302 minutes East) (South Ot degrees 38 mmutes 32 saconds East Measurad) , Applicant: Juanita I. Pedotto Planner: Andy Knudtsen • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : . ~ : : . ~ : : : : : : : : : : . : ~ . ~ . _ : . . . . . . . . . . . : : : , :..4 . . . , , +n•.\...:::. . .\.:..lv\\....v.......... ? \v ::::::::::::::...........v4 :::::::::::::::::::.::.~::::.::::::.ir.::i:{t...~w:.~:.~•~ v.v.nw::nv.~.......v:v.~.v;.:::n}v.:w:::.}.~...n}y}~~}~n::i.y..w:. . ..l..v.v..v~v.. .............'.~:~~.v.~.v..~~w.vv: ..1}~~;~~~~»..v~~~. M1n\•Q~xxvvv:v:v.. . \~......v.. vv v; .......v~... w \.:.i~..~i:Jii':J: w., ~,-,-...i: :•}:.w.v.v.~ ~ ~ . n\v :::......::::::::.:........:..::::.i:<`•::.;:;iii:~:~i:~.v.._:::.~.~:x.y. \ \aSi:•.~.;,~..,v.~i.'~:.,. .v\..~ \\;iv\.v . . . . w. a+~::..;;.k..:..... :~a... ..a:::.;.,;.;....,.,......,:.::.:. - w\\............,.:::..... :.~._:.::::._.:.~•x.•t:;~::...'~::~::........:..:::..................:...,....,~....... E.....:......:......... :...•::..o:>i;:~ii: . ;t:................. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : . k 1. BACKGROUND (Please note changes to the memo since the February 28, 1994 review are shown in bold.) - On February 28th, 1994, The Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) voted 6-0- 1, with Greg Amsden abstaining, recommending approval of.the proposed rezoning. There were several conditions that the PEC requested be added to the site ptan and the plot. One of them pertained to the common access on the southwest corner of the site. ~ The applicant was required to get approval trom the adjacent properly owners regarding the common access. This was to be done prior to first reading at Town Council. The two owners to the southwest of this property have decided they did not . want to share the common access. As a result, the applicant has redesigned the site plan and provided access for building envelopes one and four from Kinnickinnick Road. There are no new curb cuts. The two westernmost driveways have been extended further into the site to provide access to these two envelopes. ~ 1 Because of the change in the site p1an, the applicant has been required to return to PEC for a review of the changes. All other development issues remain as aqreed to bv the PEC, staif, and the applicant durina the Februarv 28, 1994 hearinq The conditions are,listed at the end of this memo. - 11. SIDMMARY OF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIOId - Staff believes that the original site plan fs more comprehensive and addresses access to neighboring properYies better than the site plan proposed at this time. Flowrever, we believe that the developer of the Pedotto property should not be required to solve an access issue in a rnanner that requires adjacent.property owners to approve the access plan. Staff feels that the appiicant has done everything aeruthin his control to achieve this sotution; however, the neighboring property owners have not been willing to participate. Therefore, staff recommends that the Town allow either site plan to be developed. Staff prefers the site plsn reviewed by the PEC on February 28, 1994 with the shared access. However, staff does not believe that there are significant negative impacts from the site plan under review for the Apr11 11, 1994 hearing and that it should also be approved. . 111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Juanita Pedotto, and her representative, Greg Amsden, would like to rezone a . parcel of land in Intermountain from Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi- Family. If rezoned, the applicant is planning to construct nineteen dwelling units in fourteen structures. The parcel of land is 2.49 acres. Of this, there are 2.36 acres that are considered ~ buildable by the Town of Vail standards. In addition to a rezoning, the proposal includes a minor subdivision request. In the future, the applicant intends to use the single family subdivision process to sell off the individual dwelling units. Prior to this, however, the currently unptatted parcel must be platted as a iot. This provides an opportunity to document building footprint locations, GRFA restrictions, and other development standards on the plat. These standards will be fisted on the plat and will be applicable to any developer as well as future home owners. Since the previous worksession, the applicant has deleted one single family dwelling unit from the site plan. Another change is that the building envelopes have been deleted and replaced with specific building footprints. Previously, a prototypical footprint was shown within an envelope. It measured 37 feet by 37 feet. The updated footprints have been increased to 40 by 54 feet for the larger type of unit and 38 by 30 feet for the smaller type. The fooiprints will be a minimum of 15 feet apart. The applicant is requesting the ability to shift the foo9prints as much as ten feet, if needed. Changes in footprint location would have to be approved by the DRB. Fifteen feet of separation would have to be maintained for both the structures and decks. The PEC approved these standards at the previous hearing on , February 28, 1994. ~ 2 `j The current site plan proposed by the applicant is made up of nineteen dweiling units in fourteen structures. Nine of these will be single family residences. Three of them will be single family residences with a deed restricted caretaker unit located above the garage. Four of the dwelling units will be located in two duplexes. The total number of structures would be fourteen. Total GRFA for these dwelling units is anticipated to be 25,900 square feet. A site plan is attached at the end of this memo which shows where these structures would be located. The chart befow shows the break down of the structures and units: Number of Units . Number of Shuctures 9 single family 9 9 3. single family with EHU's 6 3 2 duplexes 4 2 TOTAL: 19 14 The architect has designed three styles for the fourteen structures. These are shown in the perspective attached at the end of the memo. Each type wi11 have the same materials, which include a stucco first story and horizontal cedar siding on the second story. The roofs will be shake shingles and will have clipped gables. There will be corbels to support the second story cantitevers as well as the eaves. The windows will all have shutters to help create a bavarian appearance. Though there are three different interior plans, the exterior mass and bulk is almost identical for two of the units. Therefore, there will appear to be only two different types of exteriors. The larger home, with the caretaker unit, will have.a footprint measuring 40 feet by 54 feet. The smaller home will have a footprint measuring 38 feet by 30 feet. The neighboring properties to the parcel under consideration include: North: Columbine North East: , Primary/Secondary development South: Camelot Townhouses and single family development West: Primary/Secondary development The property to the, north and east is zoned Residential Cluster. The property to the south and west is zoned Primary/Secondary. The Land Use Plan has designated the parcel under consideration as Medium Density Residential, Per Land Use Plan, a range of seven to thirty- three units is possible based on the 2.49 acres. This translates to three to fourteen dwelling units per acre. IV. BACKGROUND/FORMER REDUESTS • In October of 1990, the Professional Development Corporation proposed employee housing developments on several sites in the Town of Vail. The Pedotto site was one of them. In their request, they proposed Medium Family Multi-Family (MDMF) zoning. In the memo dated October 29, 1990, staff recommended that the app(icant reduce the number of units on this site to LDMF densities and maintain the amount of GRFA on the site to RC standards. The proposal for the site is shown belaw: ~ . 3 Type of Unit Number of Unes Square Footaqe GRFA Efficiency Unhs 6 435 sq. R. 2,610 sq. it. One Bedroom Units 6 482 sq. ft. 2,892 sq. fl. . Two Bedroorn Units 27 609 sq. ft. 16,443 sq. ft. TOTAL: 39 21,945 sq. ft. V. ZONING ANAL1fSIS Total Si1e Area: 108,682 square feet or 2.49 acres Buildable Area: 102,788 square feet or 2.36 aves Allowed Dwelling Units Employee Housing Dens Allowed Units Allowed GRFA Albwed'• . • e~_ Primary/Secondary: 15,000 sq. ft. of _ 12 dweUing uoits 6 EHU's by 24,368 + 5,100 - , buildable required oonditional reviewP 29,468 sq. h. per lot (six bts) Residential Cluster: 6 dwelGng units per 14 dweiiing units - 25,697 + 3,150 - buildable acre • 28,847 sq. R. Low Densiry Muttiple Family: 9 dwelling unns per 21 dwelling uttits - 30,836 + 4,725 - . buildable acre 35.561 sq.1t. Land Use Plan Medium Density Residerrtial: 3 to 14 dwelling units 710 33 dwelling units - - per buildable acre Proposed: 8.5 dwelling unAs 16 dwelfing units 3 EHU's 21,625 + 4,275 - per buildable acre 25,900 sq. n. 'These 6 EHU's would not count in density calculations. "Garages not induded in GRFA calculations. 4 Staff has analyzed the proposed site plan aubmitted by ihe applicant and has provided a toning analysis below. Total Site Area: 108,682 sq. ft. or 2.49 acres Buildable Area: 102,788 sq. h. or 2.36 acres Zoning which would be in effed: Low Density Muhi-Family Albwed Per - LDMF Standards propoSed Uses: Single Family, Two Family, and Muld•Family Single Family and Two Family Lot Area: MiAimum size: 10,000 sq. ft. of buildable 102,788 sq. tL of buildable Setbacks: Required: Frortr 20' Front: 20' Side: 23' (west) Side: 20' Side: 20' (east) Side: 20' ~ Rear: 20' Rear. 20' Height: 38' 33' GRFA: 30,636 + 4,725 = 35,561 sq. ft. 21,625 + 4,275 = 25,900 sq. ft. Density: 9 dwelling uniLs per buildable acre or 8.1 dwelling units per buildable acre or . 21 dwelling units 19 dwelling units ' Site Coverage: 350/a of total area or 38,038.7 sq. ft. 19.59'0 or 21,137 sq. ft. Landscaping: 400% of total site area or 43,472.8 sq. ft. 71.8% or 73,761 sq. ft. Parking: Per off-street parking requirements Meets code VI. RQONING CRITERIA A. Suitabilitv of the proposed zonina Staff's analysis of the suitability of the proposed zoning focuses on density, compatibility with surrounding,developments, and ways that the proposed development can be buffered from existing neighboring uses. Staff recognizes that many of the suROUnding properties adjacent to this parcet are multi-family complexes. The applicant has estimated their densities to exceed Residentia! Cluster (RC) standards and staff has coniirmed this information. The surrounding multi-family developments have densities that range from 11.3 dwelling units per acre to 22.2 dwelling units per acre. Please see the chart below. There are also surrounding single family and primary/secondary developments which have densities that are lower than the proposal. 5 Nams Units qP" pensih, Imerlocken 39 1.80 21.6 Columbine NoAh 16 .92 17.4 Flusaheim 4 ,24 13.8 Innsbrook 8 .36 22,2 Columbine West 7 .62 11.3 Camelot 8 ~ .36 22.2 Though the density of the suROUnding properties are higher than Residential Cluster, the type of development (single family, duplex or multi-family) effects the way the density appears on this site. For example, many of the developments are made up of townhouses. Since the units are more compact than detached single family homes, the structures do not cover as much of the site and are likely to have larger areas of useable open space. Staff believes that the proposal should be modified to improve the amount of useable open space, to reduce the amount of asphalt, and to increase architectural variety within the clusters on the site. . Specifically, staff believes that Units 13 and 14, Units 7 and 8, and Units 1 and 2 . ' should be combined. The units to be consolidated, houvever, should be the smaller of the two styles. At this time, the larger unit with the employee housing caretaker apartment is shown in each of the three areas. We are concemed that the structures may be too large if triplexes are created. Therefore, cn addition to consolidating these footprints, staff believes that the employee housing units should be shifted to other footprints in the development. We believe that the variety of massing created by a combination of units will help the development be more compatible with the surrounding properties, as they have been developed in more of a townhouse style. In addition, staff believes that the resulting open spaces will be larger and will be able to accommodate additional tandscaping, particuiariy on the northeast, northwest and central portions of the site. . Landscaping is a key issue in staff's opinion; as the amount of density to be considered under the rezoning proposal should be evaluated based on how it is buffered from adjacent properties. Staff is primarily concemed about the perimeter of the site. At this time, the applicant has committed to the following: 1. Six clusters of aspen located around the perimeter of the project along Bellflower and Kinnickinnick. These clusters range from three to eight aspen each. 2. On the east end of the site, there will be Yen to twelve aspen along Basingdale. ' 6 :-t~ ' :3 , • ' ~ . _'1 . • ' , ' 3. Two pianting areas of aspen made up of a total of fifteen to twen trees will be located next to the Camelot Townhouses. ~ ~ Staff understands that the drawings submitted to the Design Review Board (ORB) will . include additional landscaping and that the landscaping shown on these plans reflects - the basic landscaping needed to buffer adjacent properties. The landscaping listed above must be incorporated into the DRB drawings and'must be planted prior to - issuance of a final certificate of accupancy for the dwelling unit adjacent to the landscaping. , - • Another key issue that relates to landscaping is the preseroation of the green space in the center portion of the site. Since the last woricsession with the Pianning and • . Environmental Commission (PEC), the applicant has had an environmental assessment (EA) done for the wetland area This report is attached to the back of this memo and delineates the boundary of the wetland area as well as a 10 foot buffer : area along all sides of the wetlands. The map from the EA was drawn on the previous plan which showed a building footprint within the buffer area. This has been corrected. The revised location sites the building outside the buffer area. Staff believes that any rezoning approval should be conditioned with a requirement that the consultant rehum to the site in the spring or summer to confiRn that his analysis made during winter months is accurate. Any modifications that would be generated by the consultant would have to be inctuded into the site plan. Building footprints would have to be shifted if the update indicates that they are located in the buffer area. lf the footprints . need to be shifted, staff believes the project should be reconsidered by the PEC. There are some large existing aspen in this area adjacent to the wetland area to the . west. They range in size from two inch caliper to eight inch caliper. Staff believes that any trees that can be transplanted should be. If they are to be cut down, they should be replaced on a 1:1 ratio based on the caliper of the tree to be removed. For example, and eight inch cafiper tree would have to be replaced with two 4 inch caliper trees. Staff believes this is reasonable since larger trees do not transplant well according to the Town's Landscape Architect. Staff understands that the applicant desires to change the zonrrtg from . . Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi Family to allow additional units, . not necessarily more GRFA or site coverage. The applicant has agreed to reduce the amount of GRFA to below Primary/Secondary standards and maintain the amount of site coverage and height to Primary/Secondary standards. These restrictions will be recorded as plat restrictions. Staff does not have a problem with the number of units if they can be sited in such a way to provide adequate open space, buffering and minimal site coverage. In order to achieve this, we believe a more clustered design concept is necessary. We feel an adequate landscape plan has been provided, the _ wettand area has been protected, and that unit iayout is good as tong as the units are combined as suggested above. . B. Is the Amendment Providina a Convenient Workabte Relationshio with Land : , Uses Consistent With Municioal Obiecfives? . 7 Under-this criteria, staff has evaluated the rezoning proposal to ensure that it wili ' provide wrorkable relationships to those properties around the site. In addition, the rezoning proposal must be consistent with the Municipa! pbjectives. Ensuring that the future development will have a reasonabiy compatible relationship with the existing neighborhood has been the focus of much of this review. On January 17, 1994, there ` was a neighbofiood meeting attended by approwmately thirty neighbors. Attached to the memo are ali of the letters that have been received by staff from the neighbocs, - The primary concerns of the neighbors seem to revolve around pedestrian safety and tiraffic safery. Staff has contacted the Police Departrnent and the Pubfic Works - Department since the neighborhood meeting to ask them to look at incxeasing patrol as well as increasing the number of stop signs in the area This appears to be a problem that needs to be solved independent of the rezoning issue. However, the proposal will have some positive impact on these issues, since there will , be pubfic improvements made by the developer. The Town is requiring the developer to provide a sidewalk that will run the length of the property. The applicant is proposing a 6 foot wide walk that will be detached from the edge of pavement on Kinnickinnick. The Town is requiring that this be a hard surface wa(k that can be maintained during winter months. It will be the responsibility of the homeowners association to keep the walk clear. This is a Town wide requirement that applies to all , developments that have adjacent sidewaiks. The appficant is proposing a cinder walk; however, staff believes it musi be hard surface. Please see the plat restrictions at the end of this memo regarding the sidewalk and other pub(ic improvements. A concem related to safery invofves the number of curb cuts on Basingdale, Bellflower, and Kinnickinnick. Originally, the applicant had submitted a plan with five curb cuts on, Kinnickinnick and three on Bellflower and Basingdale. Since the original submittal, the architect has removed all curb cuts off of Basingdale and Bellflower. Staff believes that this is a significant improvement as the driveways were previously located relatively ctose to the intersections. At this time there are five curb cuts for the entire project which access from Kinnickinnick. These curb cuts access shared driveways. Staff believes that the revised plan provides a more efficient use of the site and leaves more of the landas landscaped area and open space. Though there has not been an increase in the number of curb cuts on Kinnickinnick from what was originally submitted, staff believes there is an opportunity to improve the situation. By relocating the access to Building Envelope #1 from Kinnickinnick to the shared access on the southwest .comer of the site, there would be more open space around Building Envelope #1, and one less curb cut on Kinnickinnick. Staff believes that this would be an improvement. Another concem of the neighborhood involved parking, storage, and general . appearance of the pmject. The neighbars were concemed that individuals living in this development would not have adequate parking and that additionat cars would be parked in the neighboring parking lots. Staff has reviewed this concem with the - developer and believes that the two car garages for each unit and the driveways in front of each unit will accommodate the parking demand. An alternafive woutd be to . create a parlcing lot for guests. However, staff believes that the parking apron in front - of each garage can accommodate guests most of the time. 8 Regarding storage, during the neighbofiood meeting it was suggested that there be an area on the side of each garage for_bicycles and other miscellaneous items. The appficant has designed one of the garages to be 480 square feet. The drawings show a temptate of a Suburban and a Cherokee to indicate how much of the garage will be taken up by automobiles. The remaining area of the garage will be available for . storage, and staff believes that this will be an adequate amount. One of the goals with the storage area was to ensure.that the two parking spaces will atways be avaiiable fior - parking. Though this cannot be guaranteed, staff believes that providing the storage that is shown on the drawings is a reasonable assurance that the spaces will be available. Staff believes it is critical that the other units (with garages approximately 387 square feet in size) be expanded to the.size of the larger garage. A significant concem to the planning staff was how the developer was going to work out agreements with the neighbors adjacent to the southwest comer of the site conceming parking and access. Currently, there are parking and driveway encroachments onto the Pedotto property by the neighbors. The applicant has worlced closely with the finro existing homeowners in this area -and has worked out agreements with them for shared access. This access also inctudes a fire truck tumaround. All of the driveway in this area will be paved. The adjacent owners will share the expenses with the developer. Staff believes that this is an excellent resolution to a problem that has occurred for some time. Staff wants to emphasize the positive benefits that result from the solution have been negotiated by the applicant. One of the final issues of concern by the neighbors involves the appearance of the project. The applicant has provided prototypical elevations as well as a perspective of ihree homes sharing one driveway. Staff believes that the design character of the homes is positive, including the materials, detailing and general massing. Staff believes that the three employee housing units proposed in this development are consistent with the Land Use Plans goals of the Town to have emptoyee housing units added to our community. We believe that this component of the development addresses a larger community need. By dispersing the three deed restricted employee housing units among the nineteen ciwelling units, staff believes that there is a gaod bafance of free market and employee units within the development. Attached to the end of this memo are employee housing restrictions that have been tailored for this development. They are based on the Type III EHU; however, they do not include provisions that allow the sale of the employee housing unit. C. Does the Rezonina Provide for the Growth of an Orderlv Viable Communitv? In order to ensure that the future development on the rezoned parcel will be developed in an orderly manner, staff has prepared the following ptat 'restrictions which will be located on the plat and recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder: , 9 Plat Restrictions 1. All construction shall conform to the standards listed below and shall comply with the buiiding footprints shown on the attached site plan. 2. There must be a minimum 15 foot separation between structures, including all decks and cantilevered portions, but excluding eaves. After completion of the - first structure and prior to the applicafion for any subsequent building peRnit, the applicant must provide survey information verifying the location of previously built structures to show that the 15 foot separation requirement will be met. 3. The height limitation for the development on this parcel shall be lowered from the 38 feet allowed by LDMF zoning to 33 feet. 4. All driveways to be constructed on this site shall not exceed 8% slope. 5. GRFA and site coverage and height shall be allocated for the structures as follows: Bullding Enwlopa # Dwelling Unlts Crodft GpFA Total dRFA Skn CorWap FMipht Allow~d . 1 2 450 sq. ft. 2.080 sq. R. 2.530 sq. h. 1.800 rfq. ft. 33 fl. 2 1 225 sq. h, 1,425 sq. h. 1,650 sq. ft. 1,400 sy. n. ~~n. 3 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. h. 1.650 sq. h. 1.400 uq. ft. 33 ft. 4 ~ 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq, h. 1.650 sq, h. 1,400 oq. h. 33 ft. 5 2 450 sq. fi. 1.680 sq. h. 2.130 sq. h. 1.683 aq. h. 33 ft. 6 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. ft. 1.650 sq. h. 1.400 sq. n. 33 n. 7 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. h. 1.650 sq. R. 1,400 sq. h. 33 ft. 8 2 450 sq. h. 1,680 sq. ft. 2.130 sq. h. 1,683 sq. h. 33 h. 9 1 . 225 sq. h. 1,425 sq. h. 1,650 sq, h. 1,400 aq. h. 33 ft. 10 1 225 sq. fi, 1,425 sq. h. 1,650 aq, h. 1,400 sq. h. 33 ft. _ 11 _ 2 450 sq. h. 1.660 sq. h. 2,130 sq. ft. 1.683 sq. h. 33 h. 12 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. ft. 1.650 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. h. 33 R. ' t14 1 225 sq. ri. 1.425 sq. h. 1.650 sq. h. 1,400 sq. h. 33 ft. 2 450 sq. h. 1.680 sq. h. 2.130 sq. h. 1.683 sq. h. 33 h. 6. No fences shall be allowed on this property. 7. Phasing - The applicant shall provide the employee housing units.according to the phases shown below. 10 A. Prior to the issuance of a final CO or TCO for any ciwelling unit located on Building Footprints #1 through #6, the appficant shall secure a final Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the first of three deed restricted employee housing units. B. Prior to requesting a final CO or TCO for any dwelling unit on Buitding Foolprints 7, 8, 9 or 10, the applicant shall secure a final CO or TCO for the second of three deed restricted EHU for the development. C. Prior to requesting a final CO or TCO for any dwelling unit located on. Building Footprints 11, 12, 13, or 14, the appficant sha)I secure a final . CO or TCO for 4he third of three deed restricted employee housing units. The Fire Department and Public Works Department have reviewed the proposal and support the project with the following conditions. Fire Department 1. The fire access easement on the southwest comer of the site must be defined and then recorded at the County Cierk and Recorcier prior to DRB approval of any dwelling unit if a common access on the southwest comer of the site is provided. The easement must be posted in field with "No Parking" signs. Staff . will allow the site plan reviewed by the PEC on February 28,1994 or the site plan revised on April 11, 1994 to be constructed. 2. All driveway surfaces must be "all weather driving surtaces." 3. Hydrants must be installed according to Town of Vail standards. Public Works 1. Detailed regrading and landscape plans for the sidewalk and right-of-way area must be provided prior to a DRB hearing for any dweliing units. The Town Engineer is requinng sidewalks, curb, gutter, storm sewer, inlets, engineering drawings and/or grading ptans to be provided by the devetoper. 2. Easements must be dedicated for the sidewalks, drainage, utilities, road side ditches, streetlights, etc. prior to a DRB hearing for any dwetling unit. D. Does the rezoninQ complv with the Vail Land Use Plan? Staff has listed the relevant goals and objectives from the Land Use Plan below: 1_1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to seroe both the visitor and the permanent resident. 11 1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. . 1.92 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed . areas (infill areas). ' 5.1 Additional residential growih should continue to occur primarily in existing, - piatted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. , 5_5 The' existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. . Additionat employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. The Land Use Plan designates this site as Medium Density Residential. Under this designation, the dwelling units allowed on this site range from 7 to 33. Based on the ANDR designation, staff believes some increase in units by rezoning is reasortable. The goals and objectives in the Land Use Plan describe development generally like the one being proposed. Goals 1.12 and 5.1 call for infill development that is not located in hazards. This plan complies with these goals. Also, the Land Use Plan calls for adciitional employee housing, which will be included in 4his proposal. Staff believes the three employee housing units proposed are positive. a/11. MINOR SUBDIVBSION CRITERIA The Subdivision Regutations in the zoning ordinance establish minimum stanaiards foP the creation or modification of lots. The Subdivision Regulations sllow for the division , of existing lots with the creation of newr lots from previously unptatted properties. The zoning ordinance establishes the requirements for lot dimension, !ot size and road frontage. These zoning standards have been rnet by the Pedotto proposal. The zoning code requires a minirnum lot size of 10,000 square feet of buildable area. The proposed lot size is 102,788 square feet of buildable area. The miruimum frontage required is 30 linear feet on a public right-of-way. The proposed frontage is approximately 1,000 linear feet. There is also a requiremenY that the lot be able to enclose a shape 80 feet by 80 feet within its boundaries. This standard has also been fulfilled. In addition to the specific standards listed in the Zoning Code, the Subdivision Regulations have purpose statements which are also criteria to review subdivision proposals. The purpose statements of the general provisions in the Subdivision Regulations (Section 17.04.010(A and 13)) are provided below: "17.04.010 - Purpose. A. The Subdivision Regulations contained in this title have tieen prepared and enacted in accordance wlth Title 31, Article 23, Part of C.R.S., 1973. For the purpose of promoting the health, safety and welfare of the present and future inhabi4ants of the Town of Vail, Colorado. - 12 B. To these ends, the regulations are intended to protect the . environment to ensure efficient clrculation, adequate improvements, sufficient open space, and in general, to assist the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the Town. 'Fhese regulations also provide for the proper arrangement of streets and ensure proper.distribution of populatfon. The regulations atso coordinate the need for public services with governmental improvement programs. The standards for design and construction of improvements are hereby setforth to ensure . . adequate and convenient traffic circulation, utilities, emergency . access, drainage, recreation, and light and air. Also intended is the improvement of land records and surveys, ptans and plats, and to safeguard the interests of the public and subdivider and provide common protection for the purchasers; and to regulate other matters and the Town Planning and EnvironEnental Commission and Town Council may deem necessary in order to protect the best interests of the public." The proposed plat will be taking a currently unplatted parcel and creating it as Lot 1, Innsbrook Meadows. Staff believes that the change from an unplatted parcel to a platted lot will not negatively impact the criteria listed above. As part of the subdivision approval, the design and construction of jmprovements in the public right- of-way will be reviewed by the Town Engineer. The developer will be fully responsible .'for providing a public sidewalk and drainage facilities adjacent to this parcei. Staff . believes that these requirements fulfill the standards Ifsted above. The Subdivision Regulations are further intended to serve the following specific purposes (17.040.010 (C)): "1. To inform each subdivider of the standards and criteria by which development and proposals wiil be evaluated and to provide information as to the type and extent of improvements required." The developer is fully aware of the requirements of the subdivision. "2. To provide for the subdivision of property in the future without conflict with development on adjacent land." - Staff has evaluated the proposed rezoning and subdivision proposal relative to the surrounding properties. As previously discussed in this memo, the developments to the north of the slte ail exceed the proposed densities. Furthermore, steff has worked closely with the developer, the Fire Department, and the Public Works Department on the proposed site plan. The site plan will be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office as an exhibit to the Innsbrook Meadows plat. The site plan has been carefully designed to minimize conflicts with developments on adjacent land, to preserve the environmentally sensi4ive area in the center of the site, and to ensure that all future development will be in compliance with Town standards. 13 ' "3. To protect and conserve the value of Iand throughout the municipallty and the value of bufldings and improvements on that land:" Staff believes that future development, In accordance with the proposed site plan and . plat, will not adversely affect the value of buildings and improvements in the surrounding area. . "4. To ensure that subdivision of properties is 6n compiiance with the Town's zoncng ordinance, to achieve a harmonious, convenlent, wmrkable. relationship among land uses, consistent wGth municipal development . objectives." As discussed previously in this memo, the proposed reaoning and deveiopment on the replatted lot will be in conformance w6th the proposed zone d6strict of Low Density Multi-Farrflily (LDMF). "5. To guide public and private policy and act6on in order to provlde , adequate and efficient transportation, water, sewage, schools, - parks, playgrounds, recreational and other public requirements and facilities and generally to provide 4hat pubUic facilities wiil have sufficient capaclty to serve the proposed $ubdivision." ` Staff believes that the review by the Public Works Departrment has identified aII issues such as transportatfon, water, sewage, etc. and that the eufsting infrastructure wlll be able accommodate the new developenent. The developer wfll be responsible for providing drainage improvements and sidewalk improvePnents on the perimeter of this site. These witl tie in with existing improvements In the area.and will be consistent wath the work the Town has done in the Intermountain neighborhood in the recent past. 1@6. To provide for accurate legal descriptions of newly subdivided. land and to establish reasonable and desirable construction design standards and procedures." The applicant will be requesting Single Famfly Subdivision review for each unit as it is constructed. Once the foundation has been poured, the applicant will be mble to submit a Single Family Subdivision application for that site. Staff believes that using the Single Farnily Subdivision process, the land will be further subdivided in conformance with the Town standards. '7. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, ponds, and to assure adequacy of drainage fac6lities, to safeguard the water table and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the municipality in order to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community and tbe value of the land." Staff belieeres that the environmen4al assessment done for the central wetland area of the site adequately discusses the issues associated with that area. The wetland area has been cielineated and a buffer area has been added to fvrther protect the green 14 space. A condition of approval of the rezoning is that the consultant who provided the environmental assessment return to the site fn spring or summer to verffy his estimates. Staff understands that during winter months, accurate wetland delineations cannot be done. tf there is any change to his original estimates, the applicant will have . to retum to the PEC wlth the site plan modifications. The verlfication must be done prior to any issuance of a building permit for this property. - VIII. - STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning and minor subdivision. The minor subdivision approval wili be contingent on approval of the rezoning. We believe the proposed LDMF zoning is consistent with the rezoning criteria and subdivision criteria and will be ' compatible with the surrounding properties. Specifically, staff believes that the requested zoning is suitable for the site given that it will be integrated into the neighborhood per the design of the site plan. We belive that the request provides for workable relationships with suROUnding land uses and is consistent with municipal objectives. Specifically, it is consistent with five different goals as weN as the MDR land use designation of the Town's Land Use Ptan. Finally, staff believes that the plat restrictions will insure that the development will contribute the viability of the community. The proposed subdivision meets all of the platting requirements of the Zoning Code as well as the purpose section of the subdivision section. Therefore staff recommends approval with the conditions that: (Please note that the conditions shown below in bold reflect the changes per the Planning and Environmental Commission.) 1. The developer shall submit the subdivision plat, site plan, and recording fees to the Town prior to issuance of any building permit for a structure on this property. The plat and site plan shall include the plat restrictions listed below and all future development shall confoRn to these. a All construction shall conform to the standards listed bebw and shall comply with the building footprints shown on the attached site ptan. b. There must be a rrgnimum 15 foot separalion between strudures, induding all dedcs and cantilevered portions, but exduding eaves. Afler the constructlon ot the tfrst structure and prior • to any subsequent building permit epplications, the applicant must provide survey infortnation verifying the location of previously built structures to show ihat the 15 foot separation requirement shall be meLgivan the eonstrucdon ot the proposed uMt(s). c. The height limnation for the development on this paroel shall be bwered from the 38 feet allowed by LDMF zoning to 33 feet. d. All driveways to be constructed on 1his sne shall not exceed 89'e slope. e• GRFA, site coverage and height shall be allocated for the sWdures as follows: 15 8uildfng TaRal GRFA Z Enwlope N DwNling Unib Ceedk GRFA Atlowed gib Covwogo FWgM 1 2 450 sq. h. 2,080 sq. h. 2,530 sq. h. 1.800 sq. ft. 33 h. 2 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. h. 1.650 sq. f1. 1.400 sq. h. 33 h. 3 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. ft. 1.650 sq. h. 1.400 sq. ft. 33 h. _ < 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. h. 1.650 sq• fl. 1.400 sq. fl. 33 ri. 5 2 450 sq. h. 1.680 sq. h. 2.130 sq. h. 1.683 sq. h. 33 h. 6 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. ft. 1.650 sq. it. 1.400 sq. ft. 33 h. 7 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sQ• h. 1.650.sq. h. 1.400 s4. h. 33 h. 8 2 450 sq. h. 1.680 sq. fi. 2.130 sq. h. 1.683 sq. h. 33 h. 9 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. h. 1.650 sq. h. 1.400 sq. h. , 33 h. 10 1 225 sq. fl. 1,425 sq. h. 1.650 sq, h. 1A00 aq. h. 33 R. 11 2 450 sq. h. 1.680 sq. h. 2.130 sq. h. 1.683 sq. h. 33 ft. 12 1 225 sq. h. 1.425 sq. ft. 1.650 sq. h. 1.400 sq. fi. 33 ft. 13 1 225 sq. ft. 1.425 sq. f4 1.650 sq. h. 1,100 sq. ft. 33 ft. 14 2 450 sq. h. 1.680 sq. h. 2,130 sq. h. 1,6@3 sq. it. 33 h. t. No fencos chall be allowod on Uti8 proparry. ' 9• Phasirg - The applicarrt shall provide the emPloyee housin9 unils axording to 1he pFwes ahown below. Pnor to the issuance of a finel CO a TCO for arry of the first six stnxxures oonswaed in Innsbrook Meadows, the applicant shall secure a final Cenificme of Occupancy or Temporary Certificate of Oecupancy for the fust of three deed reatricted empbyee houaing wft. ii• Prar to requeaing a final CO or TCO for arry of the oevemh through temh stnictures oonstructed in l^nsb?ook Maadows. the applieant ahall tecure a finW CO or TCO for the aecond of three dead restnaed EHU tor the development. iii. Pnor to requesnng a final CO or TCO for any of tha oleventh thrcwgh fourteenth structures conswaed m Innsbrook Meadows, the applicant shall sewre a fmal CO a TCO for the third of three deed restnaed employee housing unas. 2. The developer shall have the Environmental Assessment updated and shall have any required amendment to the site plan presented to the PEC for their review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permit on this property. - , , 4. The driveways serving Building Footprint #1 shall be modified to reduce the length by shffting the curb cut to the west The Town Community ~ Development staff and the Town Engineer must approve the change prior to any DRB hearing for-any dwelling unit on this property. 16 5. The existing aspens located to the west of the green space area in the center of the site shall be transplanted or replaced on a 1:1 ratio based on the caliper of the existing trees. For example, and eight inch caliper tree would have to be replaced with two 4 inch caliper trees. Staff believes this is reasonable since larger trees do not transplant well according to the Town's Landscape Architect. 6. Staff may approve up to 10 foot shifts in building footprint tocation frorra - those shown on the plan approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission on February 28, 1994 ,as long as the 15 foot separation between the units is maintained. 7. . The applicant shall provide a minimum garage area within each structure of 480 square feet. 8. The applicant shall amend the site plan and subdivision plat according to the Public Works and Fire Department comments listed below. These changes shall be done prior to any DRB hearing for any dwelling unit on this site. - Fire Department A. The fire access easement on the southwest comer of the site must be , defined and then recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder prior to DRB approval of any dwelling unit if a common access on the southwest comer of the site is provided. The easement must be posted in field with "No Parking" signs. Steff will allow the site p18n reviewed by the PEC on February 28, 1994 or the site plan revised on April 11, 1994 to be constructed. B. All driveway surfaces must be "all weather driving surfaces." C. Hydrants must be installed according to Town of Vail standards. Public Works A. • Detailed regrading and landscape plans for the sidewalk and right-of- way area must be provided prior to a DRB hearing for any dwelting units. The Town Engineer is requiring a hard surface sidewalk, curb, gutter, storm sewer, inlets, engineering drawings and/or grading plans to be provided by the developer. ' B. Easements must be dedicated for the sidewalks, drainage, utilities, road side ditches, streetlights, etc. prior to a DRB hearing for any dwelling unit. 9. Either site plan, the one reviewed by ihe PEC on February 28, 1994 or the one reviewed by the PEC on April 11, 1994 may be constructed by the applicant. 17 90. Approval of the rninor subdivision shall be contfngent on approval of the rezoning. Ovecvnemos\cedoco.,o, • J ~ 18 , - = iftDAmEs & MooRE 1125 SEVENI'EENI'H STREEI', SUITE 1200. DENVER. COLORADO 80202-2027 (303) 294-9100 FAX: (303) 299-7901 January 21, 1994 Community Development Town of Vail • 75 S. Fmntage _ Road Vail, CO 81657 , Attn: Mr• Andrew Knutdsen File: 02442-050 Re: Wedand Analysis - Pedotto Property West Vail Dear Mr. Knudtsen: The above-referenced property was inspected on .January 19, 1994, to determine whether wetlands occur on the site. This inspection was conducted with Greg Amsden of Christopher Denton Real Estate and Russell Forest, Town of Vail staff. ' This analysis must be considered preliminary because of snow, which covered most understory vegetation. Therefore, shrubs and trees were used to indicate potential wedand areas, along with site hydrology along a stream. The results of the field inspection are provided in the attached letter report. Please contact me at 1-299-7836 if you have questions on the information pmvided herein. SMOORE ettin , phD SemEcolo s Enclosure cc: Greg Amsden t nu:mcm p:\ra7lpedoonWfi01 OFFICES WQRLDw9DE „ . , . . OF A PARCEL OF LANO LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION O T WNSHIP 6 SOUTH,RANGE 61 WEST OF THE 6TF1 *PRINCIPAI MERIOIAN, EAOLE COUNTY, COLORADO . . . M~mITr ~ ' ~ AIN.•Ny~Y ~ ~Y ~M\y~ w1~~1 YIM~1` 11 ~~~~1 ' 1 `~~10 OIM 1 INI~I~IH IM+ w«1 1 ~u ~~S 1 1 ~N~r. rS 1~ tM ~YI~ N 41~~W • ~ Mr~lnlwll 1~~~~~M I~IIw~ ~ ~~M 1~~\II, w~ 1~1~ ~1~~ A~M~M IIr ~M 1~~ N y rlrl 11~11 ~W. W~~ w I~~w~ q~ ~ I~Ir W W 1• 4r1 ~ MIN • Nw`y~ ~ IN MIwN I~I~~w.Iw ~~Y. 1• ~v M~~ N+ • 1~ • ti~IW~ ~yi 1~ N• 11 M~~~ tiy~f n~~~ MI1~1 ~~wl yr~ Y~ YI ~Y W~ tiw~ IM I, • 11 ~ • 1~11 N I~r~ ~MI Y~~• F.Ty11i1~~\11~ ~/f IMW ~ ` • M~w~ ~~w • ~~w1~.11 N~1 • INI I•R~ • :~T'L~ + Z~'7. ' ~ i S .~~.~i~.ii~«'u ~~i.u , ' ~ ~1 IM M ~ ~ Mw~ ,i IM~~~j. M~~r Y~~1~1.I~ J~~~ i~ ~•~~1 N.~~ ~ ~ M • ~ Nw~. 1 ~«Y W\ ~1.1~ • _ _ - ~ :~.1 ~~I.., ~wt .r I . Ir ~.js c~:tit'~'trlnll"e ! . M~w MI~ r ~ r, , / rw..~r•Y~i. 1~~1~ 1~.11 1~~1 ~IW 1~ , N ~ • 1~ 1 1.~ ~ I~W • ~I w~~1Y MI~ • • - „ .,:.r.. . a. M., ~,.~r,..,,~~. - . . . ti. ~~I..H~ IMtii~14~~i~riW~~~~l• 1~~.M 1«~1 • : ~ t ..3 I= • ~«\1~ 1M • \ ~ ~'~Y `L ^Z ~ ~ ~ • - ~ . h»~=:ii'' S:°~'«i ~«u u an~.. u~ r..». ' C_ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ' • • • ~ ii~u ~ Si , . / aww ~ ~ • ` J1 .,3. ~ ~ • ~~~~.r ~ • . . . . f.'.ZC -.i~'~ ~ / A r~ ? P~~^~+K ~Me"b wwa r~ wnu~fy R..sa ae ''ij % s' • 1 ~ . tt~~f.w°.,,,,^~^^...n-..;' ...~.~...+r ~w-:. ~•~wrr~.l~ tT"'?~ . .w.y) ~^?"w Mtai - * . ' ' 6 ~i.+( ~ : ~ ~ I ~ ~ , ~ : I W*FFN:t ~M: ~a:.~ r j , • n:et...~F~ l ~~,Fv.wiril .:Y~ ~ ~ •14 ~ ~ g? ~ , • r, . t~v ' : ~ . . _ ? ~ ~.p!!o' ~ ~/~j/ ~ /y^ w~l ` _ = ~ - j ~ Guo nu. ~a ~"J : :•'i~~ ~ ~ ~ • \ ~ ' 1; /c' _ _ _ ~ . w . ~ ~ L . _ ~ . • n . ~ ~ ~ - ' ~ ~ s ./~j / + j , l C • ~ ~ - 1 ~ / ~ /Ix~L•i~ • . - • • ~ , ~ / / ~ / Y »N ~ - J . ' 1 . ~ L , /i ! ~ x ~ • ~ / , ` ~ ~ . . t M cM"re, 3 ?~~al ~ / / Z ~ ~-~.r-- ~ ~,D.__,~ , ~ I ~ • :is'- ''~tvcu:v?~Ht ~ ~ _ _ , ~ . • o~,'.`~ _ - . ~j~ i~ . • : , . _ lR ~ . I ' ~ ~ = - '~;h1 ~ . - ~'`~~c,,.-:_.. ~ ~ ~ / r.r~~w.• `'r~.,•'• ' . 1 ~,r un ~ ~ ~ ~ n« .rr ?t~[r~ ....a . ar ~ ~ AUSN M17MOMOM3 ws vr~we ua•~ r rr~ WflT RI73C C. COAIN'JM , . ~ jir ~ ~ ~`r n.no.~ e~u ar ' • ~r • wr r. ~ ~w.e w . ` ~wr w~ a.as.,e r~mY rq ' ~?w~ arri V~A •tar~.~r.r i1~• MMJ~~JS~~~~.b. . ~ Ir~ ~w ' e:ocu a . . • Vaa wR.aw_uiim~ . . u[,•~+~vr o e.a... ' t, Mm ~o~*..~ t..w.[t~ • Y w. w K ~.u~.~w....~w.~.e~wrer~rts.~• • U..1 Ir. ~/tw Ir~ NY' ~1f ~W ~~b ry~'H \I^M~ wM • r A A~~ IM w~~ ~I~ MWI M_ . v Aw Nlw~ ti~I1Y blyW ~w 4•~•,~ ' _Ni MI~~ •~/Y~Y'~ r~f /r Ir ~r.~ M 4~~w Y YI~i ~j yw~~ ~rh w~ O YM M ~ . .~I~M A II~N ~I~w~ r~~. r ww~• ~ ~W ~ M~~ Nw W YY N M~ ~v~11 ~y ~r.~.wr. Orr. a~~~,ft" . . . . . • . ' M.. 'iq. , ' . . . ' . l.~:i.:'.:1~;•~~~~~ . `K.. • ~Y: , . . ~ ' ' . , , ~ . . • ? . ~ . . . . . ? , . . ~ ~ . , ~ - ~ ~ , ' . . • , , . • ' ~ . ' ' 1 . ,il~{ . . . . ' ' ~ . . , , ' • ' ~ r ~ 1' ' • . ' ~ ';•;.1, ~ - . . . ' . . . . ;..~I; • • • , . • • - _ I •ir'-R. ~ ~ .t:L4.f:~ ~ .~`z'+'~ea~t? , . ~~~T- ' ' ~ ' ,v : : ' ' • - _ ~ ~ ~r~~J ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i ~~T' ~ `s"' • -L 1 1 1- ~CI 7-JJ _ ~ f • ~"'~•'-3... .../:.z r _J` _ ~ = • ~ f . - ~ ~ . d ~ ~ ~~r ~ - _ _ _ _ .ra: ~ ~a • . . ' ~ q~ ~ = ~ _ . . ~ I,~ . . y: ' . ! I i~ ` ~i.~i~ ~ - • - ~3M' '1' ~ ~ ' ~ • . . ~ . , ' - ~ ; ~ • • ~ ~ • ~ 1 • . /~`_j^ ~ • • ~ • AJ• ~ Jr'I ~ ~ . / + • . . ~ ~I\~ 1 • . . 1 ' ' . ~'u~J G~'" 1 r%OL.J.S . . . ' , t-~1-'~? . • ~ , • . . . ~ ~ ` L,..; . • M ~ {''Y;:~~L~ i~'k+K ~±~i:~;?i i{. ~..;•,'si..:y.t; .S'~.. , • . . . . , ~ . • ? . ~ , . . , . . . . . • ' ' . , ' . . . . '..~,~~ft, ' • . ~ ~ , , • , . . , . . , , . . . , . . , . • • • , . . ~ ,,A ' t ' r'f . . . . . . . ' . ' _ ' ~.t'• ' 1~ ~ ~ ~I~^ . . , • . . ~ • . .:r1 . • . . ' ~ ~ ' . 1 / , . . , . . 1 ' • • ~ . ~ ~ . ' , . . . ~ i. 6 ~~i ' , ~ ~ . . • . , . • ' • . • ! • I.i~~~i:l:.. , ~ ' , . . ; ' • , • • . . i . • . . , . . ~ , - . . • • , ~ : i i , • . . . • ' •~t ~ ' f~~ ' ~ • . . ~;4~ • ' . ' • . ' . ~ ~ ' ~'I~~'~''I~i~ i . ~ • . • i.,~ • . . . . , . . j . t'. . . . , . I ~ - a ~ ~ . ~ . _ r_-~.._ s ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - {~"~i~. _ . ' . . - • ~ ~ . a~'. L.n~ . ._v~` ; I ~ _ r.`_ J ~ ~ ~ _ ~~!q+ ~s-+-LSBr~. ~ ' s.. .u . =-~'.-s ~ ~ ~ _ -:J 1 ~ _C~~I~ 1 f' ~ j . 1, 1 =1:'6,:. ..i:i-.. _ ~ ~4 - ~ - , ~ ~ ~ . ~n~t!=~'a' ~ - r'`_. d~ - - ~ ~r=.;;1 u . . ~J, ~ • t ~ ' . . ~ `~r Uj~~ ~1 S`, r_ _ _ =,~t _ ar.~ _ .ra. • . . ~ • . _ - _ _ ~ • . i• :"'a~+. ~ . ' _ . ' • ~ ' ' ' 1 ~ ~ • ' , , tJ~.''~ ' ~ • ~ . . , ~ t + • i • . . ; . ' ~ • . , i~~s~~' 1 ~ • . . • `-'~`-r~ ' t'~1','= f' • L ' . ~Y:: ~ ,.v.:4`'`,~`;:~~~~~~,~;;`~~t; ~ i . . ~ ii• . ~ . . - i i:r . .~.~t+%~... . . . • , • . ; . • . . •.,.i?,;(~~;~;'1> ~~,i. • ~ • , ' , , ~ • ~ . 1 1 ~ ' . . . . . . . ~ i.^ ~ ~ ' ~I•'~ ~ ~ . • . . f ~ . . . . ' ~ . , . . . . . I ~ . . r , ~ 1 ~ • ~ , , ' ~ i~l ' . ' . • . . . , . r . ' . . . . ' . . , , , „ . • . . . , . . ,1; `;I. i. ' ~ . . . - . . • . . , • . ~ . ~ . . . • `,...i . ~ •ti ' . . ' ~ . . i ~ ; ~•1; . . . . . . . . ' , ' ' . ! . . . • . . . . , . , . • • • • • ~ • ~ ~ ' ~ • • ` ~ • ~~Y• " ~ \ , r ~ _ _ _ _ : - . ~ ~ . s.~ - - S~ • Plate 1. Willow-dominated sueam that flows southeast to northovest across the property.. Area of property on the leit - side of photo is non-forested. ~ r~ • .:1/ - , • .-"~`'`•t,=: ' ~dY M~ t . • _ ~rv . 17' ' r ' - • • ' r ~ - , . x- , _ ~ • - _ ~ J ' ~ . aa~~. ~ . . ``=r'~ '~~T. I .'.';.:•~'~ti:~~•~~`,~(v~.` ' r'~' .:L~. .a~'.n.:~.raj~~~~f~~ ••_~r' ~ .~~ii ! . , ^F - J~r• . ~',~ii7+.'~'~ • : . ~.:.~~.~+'i'~ , - Plate 2. A small seep may be indicated by the presence of coxv parsnip and coxv bain (center backorolind). i ~ • ;'t , . ~ ~ : i!' C. . : •i; . . ~ . . t ~ •':~1e~~'..':.J:~_ I • L.t1.. I . 1'I • • ' r; ~ tO ~ v C'4TAGE 8LE C4l;LE V1':IC,t! 30 ~iet ~ Fa 's .•eo• O/OIYT coo ~ N . co l5. 4561 , fn . G • ~ ~O ..i . ~~NN~ ~ w' _ ~ . ~ , ~ y r- •,i . • . ` . . „ 1NV 26 61~ ` • . II y~ ~ . •~1~~'~ . aL1 ~ i L2 \ ` ` ^ ~ i° ''i . ••`,n i ~bl~~ • C ..bo. . ao~ 14 • O_C8-N86' 36 ° 1 "E T~7g • 59 ~ ~14743 Am268.65 •31~ 44 ~ ~ . ` Sg 20 ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ • ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ . , ~ , . i \ j eo~ ~ t,a c du 5 MOaE H ~ a pa 3L _ l t.~; ~ • • l• . ,e' f,};• • . . ~ . , . . . • ~ ~ ` .f ~ ` . ~ ` ~ ~ • 18 .0 1 „ ~C_ _ 60~ • / - ' . ~ ~ " ' ~ 7 ~ ~ 4 ~ ,,,t~-~ / !'~i~~- t • ' ~ ~ ~ • - . 14' ~ i''• , ~ - :""6 qQ:K •.t' ' vt_ ~°"'`.'%;o~ ' _ _ ~ .r- ~ - - `78 50 Ic • S ~ • ' i' r - = : ~ j'~ _ - 7H60 - -'."s'= ~ . ~'r ~ . ~~...~v ' -.Y~~ • . -M.?i. RIM 57.80 IPIV. 4 9.70w ~ . : . f T;1~.•~: j'r ej 6 ' ~ 4 - • c ~ ; ~ . ,•i ! j._.F•~ ~ J!~t t~ • a'r ~ S8 S ( Pr ~s?'~;, . . . • . . ~ . . ~ ~ S.E 'y;.'~:ti..:. . • . . • • . • _ • - . . Y : -~r• ~ ~ • . . ~ . . • . . . . _ _ . •~..~'Y. . . _ . ' ~ L. ~ . . ~ . , . t - . . ~ ; : ~ . . , v ~ 1'! ' ~ ' ~y~ti. • _ . ' , . I-j; ~ •r :Jr j i . . ~ . . ' • • . - ~ ~ . . - . . ~r 1 1 _ . •'yj Hon Jan ' 94 18: qg PAGE 2/2 t _ . . . TO: Greq Amsdea • ' • _ Andp IGzudtsen . . FROM: Kap Chenep . • . '..'`~„J-• " 2754 Baaingdale Blvd. , • 4.76-4935 I mag not be able to attend the neiqhborhood meeting t.hja • evening, so•I wanted to eonvep ny fee.lirsgs the gropose d , development on tha Pedotto prcperty. oa . I have to sap that I don't understand the opposition which is being mounted to the development, since it seems to me *_o coavey a ver-I residential feelinq, -dhich is what I think . most people in Intermountain are hopinq to have, insofar as it is possible vith the eondominiura projeets alreadp is3 . the neiqhborhoad. . I think it is a goo3 idea to build single family hc;nes, since.that is what fasnilics in Vail want now that ve azQ cominq of aqe. The families that havfl lived here loaq enough have qrown grom rentinq spart*neats, to cwaing condorainiums, thzn d•iplexes and ultimatelp sinqle familp ' homes. Reqardless of wheti:er or not that is the best use of our limite3 space, that is vhat peopla want. ' . Buildirig the homes for sale, rathcr than rental, also adds to the residential quality of the rroject. I thir.k the revised site p:an appears to be an improrement aesthetically on the ori?inal site plaa. As I mer.tioned at the work session in December, my onlp concern Would ra t.hat a rezonir.q to low density aulti-family, ' so that the nature of the developner.t cauld not be-chanqed once the ir.crease3 density vas approved. . ~ Ilsn s°ir}' that I m,ight not be able to attend the meeting, . since so often onlp-negative vcicea are heard at these . meetings. If I can ge= aWay :rom my other appointsient w ear2y enouqh, I vill be there. . : , , . . "~:r~.:<.. , _ . . . . • _ - ' ' - . ' •~w>.~la, . _ , . . . , C. . . . . , • . : ' ' . . . .it . . . - . . . .,i ~ - Y; ~ • , ~ , ' . AMERIC~iN ' y* ~ 7C ti~r' - > » - sxz EacXsavGz . . , , cco) ~ , • ~ ~._1_~~c'~ ~ • ' ~ ~ ~ ~~?t.~.~,-~1l . ~ ~ c,~.5 c~s ' ~5 ~~-e..~ . ~ . ~ ~ _ . YOA qA1 alv)( \VA-w*) fc ~ ~~1n~C~~ ~1 L . , vap~n. c~ . ~O"- cx ~ VoloraXK~1 ~ e2251tifa11 Street Vail, Colorado 81 E~57 (303) 47G-1477 Outside C - _y 'it F~'~ • • . , ~ . P • i;i ~ , , ' • MA"aiG'0!CLT0 & 1SS~ {?S ~ y. . , , . . . • CCkST-. Ih.`TIOIn C L-~5L1T.'w+~'7'.Y . rLICliI7EG7t1Il-L ' • 1 Dcccmber 20, 1993 • • : . • . . . ; ' . . . . . . . ; o. • . . T'hc City of Vail ; . - • Planning Deps~rtment; ' • . ; Vai1, Colorado ' . • . . , , . ; . . , ; . . . A'ITIv: Andy knudtsea ' . . ~ . . . , ~ • , , , . . . . RF.: ' .8;50 KinaiclanriicL- Road Zoraing . . ~ ~ , , , . ' • . Dcar Mr. I{nudtscn; : : : . . : . , Yurs•sant to oUr recerit discussians,'I wish'to fcrmally ovtline z4objections rtgarding tre, Pedotto Parcel dcve!qpnenr plans,'as currently presenied. 'ths increisa.in dansity on the proocrt); couplcd %~-ith thc, sig;uficant anlount of hard ,urface ~ nreas, will re;ult in an ircrea:ed run-ofL A preliminary invcsubation reveals a great dtal of th:s run-off:has potential:,to char.nel itse:f inta the adjacent parcel at the cxisa:lg Vail _ Swim a.nd Terir:is CI'ub cntrance. lnis increaced nin•off will not o:ily causc problenu ,.,..associated witli the eatrance; but it wiil ha-ve a neQative impact,on the site drainaoe on the ~ structuresimnediatefy adjacer.t to I~'..inuickinaick Ro2d. , • : • . . ; . : T1':e second_concern whicb v~c havc:regar~ng the increased density and the proposcd plan, zelates to the architectural de;ion which 's bcin; propos~d. Wc highly rccornmend t;iat the' dereIopcr softcn the ~ery hard lines of his projcct;tl1rou&h the ut~7ization nf pcr'nicier eartb be.:ming, and a genetous im: t--ilation of conifzrs and decidt:ous trees to soften tl;a vi5ual impact.: . ' ' ~ • I Msh to 3dvi;e ; ou that i am not in objection to the devcloper's proposed project. However, in the bcst; ir.terest oi the imagc oi c;cyelopr.ient in Ihe to%vn of lr'ail, the above itsrns need to be adcires.~ed by the;de~relo~er. • . - 1~ •i'cl ~ ~ ' , . ; • • ' : J es A.I.A . , . . ' i , • • . . ' 1 ~ . . s ~ . NICY.niwTsT C,rTCE ~ ' - GLL~'JT.;t1A @FFiCE . • `.'9 _~'f TAA7,lRF~. ~..?E 1C7 iSO P~iVuIt.LVQ l~YE.. ~ iX''cTf OF: iCE ~RA7M7E ~r~lCr • =t~r~~AU~;a'roV96f~i ~ ~is: , v~o7AJV15sr. 3e4l n~~v~!~r~c;crulvr ' :CS-s:l•a~u . C•~CrAN~.n.c,itr~:3i•._tr•2c:s . }toUs7a4,'JUns 1I3~i0.it72 . D-11'Ef~C01.C~tAI10 !]I:a • t:4-:4s•:.17c (rAx? . 71-3. 3c3•l~+1,c7CV ' . , 732-:auy (MX) 3ClS61•SifS fF47 , . ' t ! • • . • . i ! . : , . . ; . ~ • , • . . • : ' • • ChzrIcs Ovuy , , 2833 Kinnic.kinruck #3 ~ . ..i . ~ VaiI, Cclorsdo 81657 T (303) 479-9133 = G Sun. Dec 19. 1993 l"~ To The Planning and Environmental Commission, Town of Vail, N I must Iodge, in the sfrongest possble.terms. my protest to your convening a p(anning it! IS . and zoning worksession regarding the rezoriing of the "Pedotto parcel" in Intermountain during whai is certainly one of the Valley's most busy periods. I received yo`ur nofice for an initial meeting on the 13th of December and was abie to : ••---take time to attend. I spent one and one half hours waiting for the "request for worksession" on the 2850 EGnnickinnick parcel to come on to the 2genda. After the first item of the agenda had not been finished, it was evident that the meeting was going to progress slowly. I had not pfannecf to spending the entire aftemoon at the meeting and h2d to (eave. In addition, i was frustrated by the fact that I could not find anyone in the front offica of the building who knew what a"request for woricsession' .•was. If the request was a minor procedural matter, might it not, more democratically, : have been disposed off at the beginning of the meefing? If "a request for worksession : is a schedu(ing matter should it not be sfated as such. In addition, I have not received ` a ma;led notice of the meeting on 20th December aithough f;was on your list to receive - a notice about the inifial meeiing. i am unabfe to attend the meeting on Monday the 204h as i have had prior work commitments for over 4 months: I am very interested in the proposal as 1 live at 2833 Kinnickinnick ;3 and my residence (ooks out across Kinnickinnick road at the property in 'question. . . . ( am n-ot unfavorably disposed to the devefopment of the Pedotto parcel as I believe that suitable develo'pment of a significant port;on of this land will impcove the_ Inie: mountian neishborhood. Furthermore, I am very encouraged by the open discourse that your department nurtures regarding all of Vai1's pfanning.questions. I do not feel that I have adequate information regarding this development and, at this . time, i am opposed to the plan as outl;ned in your memorandum of Dec. 13. i feel that the timing of your worksession on this property is most inappropriate. The . : neighborhood in question is certainly a"working" neighborhood and most residenis _ will be very inconvenienced by this meeting if, indeed, they are ab(e to attend at all. . . Shoutd there be any question that the submittal or scheduling of this worksession has, in any way been aifecied by the above concerns I wiit fuAy pursue my legal . . . aliernatives. In addition, l.will become vociferous and ob'streperous in my opposition . . to the app(icants proposal. • . . ! ' 1V1[EMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager RE: Town Manager's Report DT: May 13, 1994 At the last Council rrieeting, the Town Council requested time to discuss issues in the May 3rd Manager's report. Accordingly, we have allocated approximately 90 minutes to discuss these items. We will be prepared to discuss the following issues; the employee housing work program, Community Development department work program and priorities, and the new position in the planning department. I have attached memos that addresses each of these issues. ~ y MEMORANDUM , TO: Vcul Town Council Z FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Mcmager ~ DT: April 22, 1994 RE: Work Progrcun for E'mployee Housing Introduction At the Work Session on April 19th, the Council identified six housing tasks on which you wished us to focus. These included the plcmning cmd construction of the Vcul Commons project; construction of employee housing on the lots adjacent to the Town Mcmager's residence; establishment of a mortgage pool/soft second program; cmd prepciration of site plcros for Parcel H, the.Old Public Works Shop site, cmd the Water District Pcmcel. The Council also requested that we identify the expiration date of the Timber Ridge deed restrictions. I have also listed the on going efforts of the staff regcirding housing. The purpose of this memo is to provide the Council with information on these ideas, to advise you of the tasks necesscu-y to implement these projects, cmd a recommendation regc[rding priorities. Vcril Commons The RFP for the plcmning of the Vcul Commons project has been prepcired cmd approved by Council. It has been distributed to approximately forty consultcmts. The proposals cire scheduled to be returned May 16th. The Vcul Commons Task Force will review them cmd select a consultcmt by the end of May. Work on this project is expected to begin csound June 1 st cmd be complete by December of this yecir. Assuming PEC, DRB cmd Town Council approval, cmd assuming project fincmcing ccm be secured, project construction could begin in Spring 1995. As you cire awcire, the $300,000 grcmt for the State for housing must be used by June 30, 1995. Town Mcmager Lots The Town of Vcdl owns four lots immediately east of the Town Mcmager's residence. . These lots, described as Lots 1, 2, 3, & 4, Block H, Vcnl Das Schone, 1 st Filing, cire located on Gcirmish Drive. These four lots cQe 1.08 acre in size cmd cQe zoned P/S. The current zoning on these Iots would allow up to eight units to be constructed. Approximately three yecas ago the Town had several conceptual site plcros prepared ~ for fhis property. These plcros cQe in the files of the Community Development DepcQtment cmd cire avcnlable for your review. Please note that each of the plcros shows eight dwelling units on these lots. To construct eight units on these lots would require cm SDD or several vciricmces. Six units could be constructed with the existing plat. _ If you wish to proceed with this project, the Council should review these plcros cmd select one on which to proceed. On.ce the Council has selected the preferred site plcm, the steps necesscuy to proceed with this project cQe as follows : l. Hire a consultcmt to prepcire drawings. 2. Submit necessciry applications (SDD, vciriance, etc). 3. Review cmd approval by PEC. 4. Review cmd approval by Town Council. 5. Review cmd approval by DRB. 6. Prepcire construction documents. 7. Construct units. If the Council desires, we will schedule a work session to review these site plcros. Once you have selected a preferred plcm,.we will as indicated in Step 1 hire a consultcmt to finish the site plcmning, prepcffe the construction design, cmd to see the project through the design review process. Upon project approvctl, we will hire a construction mcmager supervise the site work cmd construction of the units. Given the level of neighborhood interest (cmd opposition), it would be crppropriate to schedule a public hec(ring on this matter ecsly in the process. In addition to approving the project design, Council also needs to decide how to hcmdle these units after they have been constructed. The alternatives rcmge from renting the units to selling them. I believe this issue ccm be dealt with during the Council's review of the project. Funding for the construction would come the from Housing Fund Account which has a fund balcmce of approximately $800, 000. It should be noted the construction of these units is mechcmically fcurly straight forwcird. However, (as you cse well aNvcre), the Council ccm expect significcmt neighborhobd opposition to this project. The construction of a pocket pcQk could - arneliorate these concerns to some extent. It should crlso be noted that the Trappers Run issue could crlso cdfect this project, in that if the Town purchases Trappers the . need for open space in West Vcdl is lessened. Old Town Shop Site The Town of Vcul also owns a lot on the South Frontage Road across from the Vcul ~ Associates mcuntencmce yc[rd. For a number of yecQS this property was used as a the ~ • i town's public works facility. It is now leased to the VRD, although the Town retcuned a portion of the building for storage. This property is .52 acres in size cmd zoned PUD. Our initicrl studies indiccrted that this pcscel could support between five cmd ten units. Pcircel H Site Pcrcel H is located in East Vcril. Although it is located within the corporate limits of the Town, this pcircel is owned by the Forest Service. The property is approximately. 10 acres in size. This site was identified the Housing Authority's Study cmd the Open Lcmds Plcm as being potentially suitable for housing. Wcrter District Parcel The Vcdl Valley Water District owns a small pcircel on Red Scmdstone Road which it intends to sell or trade. The site is ccpproximately 1.24 acres in size. If rezoned to LDMF, this pcu-cel could support ten or eleven units. We cire in the process of prepcsing cm RFQ for design services to prepcire cmalyses cmd site plcros for these pc'trcels. In addition to cmalysis, plcmning cmd design services, surveys, topographic maps, cmd title resecirch may also be required. We c[re also contacting the owners of the pcircel to advise them of our intentions. However it should be noted that we have had discussions about housing with both of these entities previously. Mortgaqe Pool The mortgage pool as envisioned would provide a funding source to help home buyers lessen the impact of the down payment to purchase homes in Vcul. I cun in the process of setting up a meeting with Jen Wright, Andy Knudtsen, Kristcm Pritz, Steve Thompson, Jerry Flynn, cmd Mcsk Ristow to discuss this proposal. No date has been currently been set for this meeting. Timber Ridge Restrictions Timber Ridge Apc[rtments were constructed between 1979 cmd 1981. This apcQtment complex contcdns 198 units. As pcst of the project approval, these units were deed restricted until November 30, 2001. On Going Stcdf Efforts The StaEf is currently working on zoning code cunendments that should help with the housing issue. The first would allow developers to use common cQea allocated to multifcnnily or commercial buildings to be used for employee housing. The second will tighten up the EHU requirements. The Stcdf is proposing to require the unit be rented, that the owners pay a fine or something equivcrlent if they don't rent the units, cmd that the rental rates be similcir to other compcQable units within the town. ? , ~ Recommended Priorities As you may recall during the work session with the Housing Authority, Jen Wright cmd Kathy bLcmgenwalter recommended focusing on one project cmd finishing it before tcrking on additional pro}ects. It is my recommendation the Council invest resources, both financial cmd stcdf time on the projects listed in the following order: l. Vcdl Commons. 2. Adopting code chcmges discussed previously. 3. Pursuing lots adjacent to town mcmager's residence. We recommend using the existing platting, proposing three duplexes, cmd selling the units once they are built. An alternative is to utilize cm SDD approach for clustered units to allow four duplexes. The tr.ade offs related to review process would need to be evaluated by the Housing Authority cmd the Council. 4 Hire consultcmt to develop mortgage pool. 5. Gather information cmd site plcmning for Pcrcel H, water district pcircel, cmd old Town Shops pcircels for future consideration. Thcmk you for your consideration of these issues. MEMOREINDUM TO: Vail Town Council FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager RE: Community Development Work Program & Priorities DT: May 13, 1994 At the March 8th Council work session, the Town Council reviewed and prioritized the work program for the Community Development Department. The Council's priorities are reflected in the attached exhibit (Exhibit A). At the work session on April 19, the Council reviewed the SDD ordinance. It was our perception, the SDD ordinance was to be revised to make several minor modifications, and that the comprehensive review would take place later. However, following this discussion, the Council agreed to move forward immediately with a comprehensive review of the SDD regulations, particularly relating to the applicability of SDDs in general throughout the community. In accordance with the Council's wishes, we are proceeding with this review. In order to maintain an orderly flow of work, I am requesting the Council revisit the priorities established March Sth. Specifically, you will need to remove one of the high priority items in order to make room for the work on SDDs, assuming this is what the Council desires. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. ~ . . ~ ~ . . MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development, Bob McLaurin FROM: Kristan Pritz DATE: March 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Summary of project priorities from the discussion with the Vail Town , Council on March 8, 1994. . . . . . . . w::..... . . ~<:.:.;:;.:;:.;:.::.:::::<.:;>:.:;.:::.:;>::::::.:.:.::;:::.;;:::,::: , , . .~~......~'::\'wwt•t~i i~4ti:hSftti~i(iS(~\t.i~~a.~~ 8:if\:iv ....r... ~...i.:::\i:~ii:~:ii:~i:~ti:~ . . . ~ . . . . . . ? . . . . . . . > :!':jT:':'''''i~i::'',ii~'i:~ii~:v:~:~:.Y~~[P~:•i~Qi:'i":~:i:~+h+v'~~~"t::-:!i~~~i:i:~.\~\A\~i::~:1~\\~~vT.~':F:ii::ii:i~ti.n.~.. Below is a summary of the priorities determined by the Vail Town Council: 1. Building Division. , A. Sierra Computer Implementation ~ . B. Community Education on the Development Review Process The above priorities will be completed within the next six to nine months. The community education on development review is an ongoing effort. ' II. Environmental Division. ~ A. Implementation of the Environmental Strategic Plan, to be completed within the next six months ~ B. Open Lands Plan Implementation, ongoing C. Air Quality, ongoing D. ~ Water Quality, ongoing E. Solid Waste Management Policy, to be completed within the next three months F. Environmental Excellence Award, to be initiated within the next three' months G. Food Handlers Education Program, to. be completed within the next six months ~ . . Second Tier Priorities •Environmental Impact Report Zoning Code Amendment . •Tree Ordinance ~ .r i'• ' ` •Hazaa'hrdous Waste Policy/Program Planning : A. Vail Commons Site, RFP to be completed by the end of March, 1994 , B. Housing Authority Discussion, to be scheduled in early April, topics to include the mortgage pool, purchase of existing units, Vail Das Schone project, Lion's Ridge project, and Vail Commons project. It was decided that if the Housing Authority develops any additional projects beyond Vail Commons, a consultant would be necessary to work with the Board. C. Art in Public Places Board, ongoing efforts include follow-up on the "Exuberance" mural at the Vail Transportation Center, schematic design _ for Vail Transportation Center for new lights, Temporary Exhibit Program; Mural at the Vail Transportation Center involving school ~ children, participation in Save Outdoor Sculpture, investigation of percent for Art Program, dedication of Terre Haute, and maintenance of existing artwork. It was decided that the staff should look into the possibility of having a part-time person staff this board as opposed to the Community Development Department. D. Adoption of the Land Ownership Adjustment Plan, to be completed ' within the next three months E. Employee Housing Amendment, to be completed within the next three months F. Lindholm Land Exchange, ongoing G. Organization of State APA Conference, ongoing H. Vail Associates Category III Review, ongoing 1. Gondola/Sunbird Redevelopment effort, ongoing . J. Village Loading and Delivery Plan, ongoing K. Cemetery Master Plan implementation, the Council decided that this item needs to put on'their agenda to determine a funding source. Dalton Williams and others from the Cemetery Task Force should be invited to this meeting. , . Second Tier Priorities . ' These projects will not be started until, at a minimum, a new planner is ' hired and has been on board for one month and the Vail Commons project is underway. 2 w . . Fl ^ 1 , •Open Space Code Amendments •Subdivision Regulation Amendments : Third Tier Priorities . The Council reviewed the list of projects in this category and voted for their top five choices. The following projects were included in the top six: 1. Amend the Hillside Residential zone district to require ~ larger lots and possibly less GRFA, 6 votes. 2. Newspaper boxes, 5 votes. - 3. Four new view corridors,-5 votes. --y 4. Amendments to the Special Development District Section of the Code, 5 votes. 5. Amend the parking pay-in-lieu areas, 5 votes. 6. Amend the Urban Design Considerations in relation to window design, American Disability Act implications for design, issue of alpine character, discourage split levei retail, etc., 5 votes. The following projects received votes but did not make the top six category: • •Nonconforming signs, 2 votes •Review of private parking practices, 0 votes •Creation of a Hospital zone district, 0 votes •Trash enclosure requirement, 2 votes •Utitities Master Plan, this project was seen as being a Public _ Works project if pursued and did not receive any votes. IV. Other Comments: •Do not limit current planning applications •Loot at an additional planning position funded from an increase in development fees •Look at sign code enforcement transferring to Police 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager RE: New Planning position , DT: May 13, 1994 At the March 8th Council work session, the Town Council reviewed and prioritized the work program for the Community Development Department. During this discussion, the Council discussed the feasibility of adding an additional FTE to the planning staff in order to handle the increasing current development work load. The Council discussed funding this additional position through an increase in development and building fees. This memo outlines the cost and funding alternatives for the proposed new position. The total cost of a Planner I position is approximately $41,000 annually. The last time the building and development fees were increased was 1991. They are schedule to be increased next January when the Town adopts the 1995 UBC. For your information, I have attached a memo from 1991 and current fee schedule. After reviewing the development fee issue, I believe this new position could be funded within the existing fee structure because these revenues have far exceeded the revenue forecasts. Collections for the past few years are as follows: 1989 - $317, 724 actual 1990 - $403,896 actual - 1991 - $379,260 actual 1992 - $680, 084 actual 1993 - $646, 567 actual 1994 - $286,830 budget Based on my discussions with the Community Development staff, I believe these revenues will be close to the 1993 levels. The difference between the revenue forecast and actual revenue collection is transferred to the fund balance for the general fund. Given the current volume of development activity. I believe this position is justified at this time. If the Council agrees to authorize this position, the funding for it could come for the development fee unanticipated revenues. . . When development activity eases and the development review work load is reduced, this position can be eliminated. Given the rate of turnover in community development, it is likely that, when necessary, this position could be eliminated through attrition. In terms of work activity, this position would work on reviewing minor projects, sign permits, variances, etc. This would free up the more senior staff to focus on larger, more controversial projects. Assuming the Art in Public Places Program remains at the current level, I anticipate we will handle the AIPP program internally. I also anticipate the planning staff would maintain the existing level of support for the Housing Authority and housing activities. However, most of the work described in the Housing Memo would be cione through consultants and contract labor. i t . . . / ~ : . ~ MEMORANDUM , TO: Town of Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department, Building Department Staff ~ ; DATE: July 23, 1991 . ' SUBJECT: Council review of staff recommendation concerning adoption of latest Building Codes and revisions to Municipal Code. _ - - - - I. BACKGROUND The Building Department is_progressing toward adoption of the latest codes. These include the 1991 Uniform Building Code, 1991 Uniform Plumbing Code, 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1991 Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and the 1990 National Electrical Code. After much staff debate we are proposing, limiting our amendments and deletions within each code to a bare minimum. We are however doing an extensive review of the Town of Vail Municipal Code in order to upgrade much of the content of the Buildings and Construction section of the Municipal Code. II.. PROCEDURES , The time table for adopting the latest Building Codes and revising the Municipal Code is planned as per the dates listed below: July 23, 1991 Town Council work session review of Building Department Staff direction. August 2, 1991 First publication to public of intent to adopt new codes and revise Town of Vail Municipal Code. August 6, 1991 First reading of Town Council intent to adopt latest Building Codes =and revise Town of Vail Municipal Code. August 9, 1991 Second publication to public of , ' intent to adopt new codes and revise Town : of Vax1;.Municipal Code. August 20, 1991 Second readirig of ordinance adopting latest cocles and revised Municipal - Code. , August 26, 1991 If approved August 20 by Council then new codes and revised Municipal Code , become effective. . . ; IIZ. MUNICIPAL CODE REVISIONS " "s ~ A. The Council has previously reviewed and approved staff recommendation for revisions to the fee schedule for all i fees charged for Building Permits. These changes will be reflected within the proposed revision to the Town of . Vail Municipal Code. . . . B. Practically all of the Municipal Code regarding roofs and their required assemblies per occupancy types is proposed to be deleted. C. Sections 15.08.010 through 15.08.050 coneerning the Town F Council review of all permits is proposed to be amended to reflect that the Town Council or the Building Department Staff is required to review and approve all building permits. D. Section 15.08.015 concerning Mailboxes is proposed to be deleted entirely. E. Section 15.28 concerning Water Closet Specifications is proposed to be deleted entirely. : F. Chapter 15.32 concerning the Model Energy _ Efficiency Construction Standards is proposed to be deleted entirely. . . _ ~ _ . ' • . . _ . . , . , . . . - . ~ . i `t RESOLUTION N0. 10 I ~ • Seri es of 1991 A RESOLUTION INCREASING FEES FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES ' S ~ ~ , WHEREFORE, it is the Town Council's belief that the costs relating to - certain community development department services should be increased to reflect inflation and the actual value of services provided by the Community Oevelopment ~ Department staff. ~ MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail: 1. The following fees shall be charged for services by the Town of Vail I<. ; Community Development Department: A. Conditional Use Permits , $200.00 . . - B. Vari ances $250.00 C. Special Development Districts• ~ t. 1, Establishment of SDD F-' $1500.00. 2. Major Amendments $1000.00 3, Minor Amendments $200.00 D. Zoning Code Amendments $250.00 E. Zone District Amendments (rezonings) $200.00 F., Exterior Alterations: 1. Less than 100 sq, ft. $200.00 • 2: More than 100 sq, ft. $500. 00 ; G. Subdivisions: f 1. Major (Prel im/Final ) $1000.00 PI us $20.00 , per platted • 1ot ` 2. Minor . $250.00 5 3. Duplex ' $100.00, : . . , . ' . . 4: Single Family . $100.00 5. Condominium and Townhouse Plats $100.00 ~ . ~ 6, Condominium Conversions $500.00 , . .i. H. 7, Additional GRFA (250) , $200.00 I. Secondary Uni t on Lots of Less than 15,000 sq. ft, (P/S) $100.00 J. Sign Review $20.00 Plus $1.00. per sq. ft of si gn area K. S ign Var i ance $200.00 , . . . . ' . i.~..'rfi~;.`.,~;~; ~f•. ir ~~~~z:':~ . . ' . ' , ~~'t,'., . . -i' ~e , ',v`;~•~,iF.; . ' ...~+~i, . ' . ' • ~ ;;i,, . . . , . . • ,"i; . , i'e,;f. ~ , i•: , i. e•. . . , . _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . ; . ~ . / , , . . _ - . . . L. Hazard Regulations: 1. Dispute of Designation $200.00 2. Map Amendment $200.00 , 3. Floodplain Modification $250.00 M. Art in Public Places . 1. Temporary Site Approval 150.00' - 2. Project Review Fee -p- - N, DR8 Application Fees: Valuation . 0 - $ 10,000 $20.00 $ 10,001 - $ 50,000 $50.00 $ 50,001 - $ 150,000 s $100.00 ,$150,001 - $ 500,000 $200.00 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $400.00 .~over - $1,000,000 $500.00 0. If any of the applications set forth above require . . a separate review by.any iocal, State or Federai agency other than the Town of Vail, the application fee shall be increased by $200.00. Examples of such review, may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Department of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc. ~ P. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees which are in excess of 50% of the application fee. If, at the applicant's request, any matter is postponed for hearing, causing the matter to be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant. Q. Applications deemed by the Community Development.Department to have significant design, land use or other issues which may have a significant impact on the community may require review by consul- tants other than town staff. Should a determination be made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to review any applications set forth in this resolution, the Community Development may hire an outside consultant. If the Community Development does hire an outside consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay him or her and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time he files his application with the Community Development Department. Upon completion of the review of the application by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded by the appli- cant for payment of the consultant which have not been paid to the consultant shal] be returned to the applicant. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the applicant.shall be ' paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the Town. - , . , This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1991. Kent R. Rose, Mayor . ; . • ; . ATTEST: ' . . i; . . . . t' . . Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk , , ORDINANCE N0. 6 7 ~ Series of 1991 ef AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.52.160 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TO SET PARKING IN LIEUFEES FOR COMMERCIAL • CORE I AND COMMERCIAL CORE II AT EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS ($8,000) PER SPACE; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. ~ ' WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to increase the parking in lieu fees for - Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II to reflect inflation and the increased . . costs of constructing parking spaces. . NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council af the Town of Vail, Colorado: 1. Section 18.52.160 B(5) of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby ; amen ed to read as follows: s:. 18 . 52 .160 B (5) , The parking fee to be paid by any owner or applicant is hereby determined to be eight thousand dollars ($8,000) per space. This fee shall be automatically increased every two (2) years by the percentage the Consumer Price Index of the City. of Denver has increased over each~successive two (2) year period. 2. Section 18.52.160 B(5) is hereby repealed in its entirety. ~ ~.:3: If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby ~ declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, sAfety and welfare of the Town of Vail and ; the inhabitants thereof. „ 5. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of an y provision of the Municipal,.:.:~ • Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right wh.ich has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occur.red prior to the . . . . t . effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under.or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed . and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or an ord i nance y previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 1< . , ` ~ci;'.. ' • . _ .~ui:~'.'. . . " ,^5't " . . . . . . _ . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . _I . . . . ' " . . . ' . . ' . . . . . . , 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or . ordinance, or part thereof, heretofore repealed. 7. This ordinance shall become effective immediately, with an exception for , projects which receive final Design Review Board or Planning and Envir:onmental Commission approval by May 1, 1991. Said projects will be eligible to pay the _ previous parking in lieu fees should a building permit be received by November.lr', 1991: . : . ` INTRODUCED, READ, AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this 194 day of 7Ylc4v , 1991, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on ~the day of Qrarr'I , 1991, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council'Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 19 day of ~Y?~-ti~ 1991. ~ ~ , , . . , . . . Kent R. Rose, Mayor - ' 'ATTEST: , . , . • . , .r , ; i., i, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town C~ INTRODUCED, READ, AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED' this day of _ C(,pv-i 1 , 1991. , . , . . • , 'S . . . . : . . ' §i V ' Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: , E :,c..t, . . t t,(,(~~ " ' , ' . . , . . : i : _:•i r; , Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk i , ; . . - . ~ ,•1 • , , • I . ' . „ • ' ( _ • . . , Pi;tz. ~ . r: • ' . . r _ - n ; . ' : n.,K.r..•..', a.. . . . ...a.. . . . " . n . ' . . . . . . . . • . . . '..1. .n.. ' ' . 4.... ..,_...a....._.........~__._...i_ _ _ _ I a`~ , ~_~_.__r_ . May 4, 1994 Dear Mayor Osterfoss, Peggy, ( would like to personaily thank you for calling me concerning the recent Town Council meeting last Thurs. I woufd like to restate that I was at the Council meeting as an advocate for Early Child Programs and children in general. I was not there to defiend whether Learning Tree - should pay for half of the cost of paving the parking lot on the Mt. Bell si#e ' which ABC School agreed to do when they were given the permits to build an addition in 1991. Because Early Childhood programs do not receive public subsidy, the cost of providing high quality CeP• is.expensive. I believe strongly that the cost of this care should be borne in part by the community, whom the schools belowg . t0, not just the parents currently attending the school. These children are the future of Vail and they deserve to be given the best! Over the past 16 years since our lease has been in effect, the town has a good history of supporting Learning Tree and ABC School through " cash and in-kind donations . We have built on your support of non-profits becoming educated on how to raise their own funds on the path to self- sufficiency. We have done an outstanding job in the fundraising arena. The funds we had requested from TOV in the last two years were turned down due to budget constraints. This however, does not stop me from requesting help in areas that I think are appropriate, such as waiving the paving.requirement . t encourage you to reconsider your decision. If the schools are to continue providing high quality care for young children the community needs' to assume some of this responsibility. Scholarship programs, worthy wages for staff and affordabie care will eo ever become a reality if we have to put fundraising money ( 15% of our budget) into projects like parking lot paving. 1 have enclosed a copy of the Vail Daily article, " Where do the Children Play?" As Mayor of Vail, I'm surprised that you were not aware of the support the schoo(s gave to the affordable housing project. Sincerely, Moe Mulrooney, Director `of Learning Tree I \ e~ A proposed e A housLng ~ ~ ~ project in Uail _ threatens two playgrounds . ~ a the _ nd ~ . ~ ~ . , jy. ~ - • sensibtlities of . - z some others...: Where d O t~te . children plav? In the shadow of the Mountain Bell site, children enjoy theplay equipment at the Leaming Tree preschool. Photo by T.J. Sokol. equipment :at.the Leaming Tree preschooL Photo by T.J. Sokoi. By CONNIE 8TEI68T ' have. it.: postponed until the 1"A 75 square feet of recrea- Local parents are coaceFnedplaao for: the apartment com- tional space pes chiid and is for both the safety of their~~re- P: worried whether there will be echool children and for:'•the -8:concera.is the lose of enough space. quality of their echool egperi- playgrannid. epace which wae Warmenhoven also worries encee if the propoeed re-soning )~t revamped this paist year, about construcrion problems. of the Mountain Bell towe~r.site ~d .the ;schools' nature trail Not only ie he~concerned about goes through in December.: which will be cut up for the. new the day-to-day: disruption to the Currently ' zoned as open road- - echools, but aleo about poesible apace, the Mountain Bell_ site ARike Warmenhoven, a par- accidenta, despite precautions. msy be re•zoned as multiple ent at ABC 8chool and on ite "Accidenta do happen,° he says. family space with 24 to~ 32 board of directors, has attended Increased traffic onto the apartments if approved by the manY of the meetings on the re- North Frontage..Road and the Town of Vail council. Its, pre- zoninB and he eays the nature .'four-way stor, has residents . liminary plana have passed the bmil "wil1 be hietory:' It "is not a concerned as well. Carroll . planning and zoning board: Bood tmde-0PF," he saye. Tyler, an area Realtor, says it If the parcel ia re-zoned, the Mulrooney says' she trusts will "add congestion" in that Town of Vail, which . owns, the ~t the Vail Hou~ng Authority, area property, along with the •Vail and in patticular Pritz and Jen Pritx, however, says they will i Houeing Authority, would like Wright,have the echools' best comply with county regulations ~ to see that space used to build interests:in mind, yet worriee to avoid further road congea- condominiums for employee that the current plans do not tion, such as adding turn lanes. ~ housing. Newer propoeale;;also, show any place to move the ef- Tyler ia further worried that I mention possible ownei•occu- fecte'd playground to, and this the town is "setting a bad pancy. concems her. She would like to precedent" by turning a"pretty The site is adjacent t&the see`something in.vvtiting. little meadow" and open space ABC Acres and Learning tree into.apartment buildings that pre-schools and has parents ANOTBER LSSLTE on par- will be the "first thing you see worrying about the continued enta' minda, is that an apart-: when you get off the highway." safety of their children. ment compleg could mean Warmenhoven maintains the Holly Bukacek, director of having ::more people coming site proposal is not the best use the ABC echool, says that eome and; going out of the echool of epace. He says "the whole of the parents have voiced area. Thi6 makee it hatder to thing is too much for the area." concerns about the increased maintain eafety for etudenta. . Merv IBpin admits that a bet- traffic an apartment complex $ukacek said parents have.. tsr site might be the Vail com- would produce aa .well ae the voiced concernd over the possi- . mon area near the Brandesa close praximity to the echool. 'bility of future residents cutting .Building in West Vail. War- The re-designed acceae road through school property. and menhoven said that eite would will swing around right in front using school grounde for their have acceas to both bua stopa of Learning 15ree, bringing traf- own recreation. . and storee. fic cloee to the two echools. Pritz Pointa out that the Town Mulrooney. concludes "we of Vail would retain ownership ..:pay auch a ea?all amount (to the The road would be moved of the land whether or not the :Town of Vail) that I can't across the rreek and. further to apartments are owner oc- :-always e$pect the land and all the weat, eays Kristan Pritz, the cupied. . the surrounding area to be there Vail Community Planning Dir- Even if owner cecupied unita for us," and ia willing to work ector of the Vail Housing Au- Were sold instead of rented, with the town" but would like to thority. It will also be etraight- they could not be eold to an out- make sure the school's interesta ened, so the steep incline that of-town vacationer. She says it are upheld. causea so many problems in the w,ould be a ffimilar arrangement Still, Mulrooney would like to winter will be alleviated. to the "MLldn Creek atuation." have more input from"her stu- This is the positive aspect of Warmenhoven arguee that dente' parenta at Lesrning'IYee the propoaed development, the town has not taken into "before its too late:' says Mo Mulrooney, director of account the hundred plus kids "It'a not my echool ita their's" the Learning 1ree Pre-echool. who use the two schools as ehe sayg, stating that if they Bukacek eays they did have a"their housing for the day." have concerns, now is the time variance to re-pave the parking Mulrooney states that the to mention them, not when con- lot at that spot, but are trying to achool ia reauired to have at atructions starts on the project. EAST VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCXC :CY`'"4U " OtTicers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Granun . ~ (r ` Directors - Dwight Bessmer - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie Caulkins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder To: President's Advisory Committee RECEIVED .MAY From: Jim Lamont ' Date: May 6, 1994 RE: Status Report The following is a status report on the current activities of the Homeowners Association: A. Special Development Districts: l. Town Council Action: i he Town Council appears to bz responding to our efforts to refbr.m the Special Development District ordinance. Last week, after receiving testimony from Rod Slifer and I, the Town Council voted unanimously to direct the sta.ffto have a proposal for the reform of the SDD ordi- nance by June this year. The council's action move up the schedule for SDD reform a full six months from that outlined by Mayor Osterfoss in her March 29, 19941etter to Bob Galvin. Rod Slifer's testimony and the content of the Association Amicus Brief were key factors in direct- ing the town council attention to the seriousness of public concern over Special Development Districts. Slifer's position was a result of a meeting the week preceding the Town Council decision called by the As- sociation with key representatives of community's real estate interests who have expressed concern about the recent use of SDD's. At the meeting the findings of the Association's Amicus Brief were presented and discussed. The meeting resulted in Slifer volunteering to present his opinions to the Town Council. The testimony was deliver at the Town Council'work session held to discuss a proposed amend- ment to preciude SDD's from Single Family, DupieY, Hillside, PrimarylSecondary residential zone dis- tricts. Slifer presented the view point that SDD's should be used only for large site (one acre or larger), that the gifting of additional densitv in eYChange for "exactions" was a grant.of special privilege and there- fore not appropriate. Slifer pointed out to the Town Council that the Covered Bridge Store, being redeveloped according to zoning standards by his associate Harry Frampton, provided adequate financial incentive to redevelop and upgrade the property. The Association expressed the view to the Town Council that SDD's were not appropriaie in estab- lished neighborhood, especially those wzth small lot subdivisions (particularly Vail Village). Further, that the SDD should not be used to increase density (GRFA or units per acre). It was observed that far reach- ing precedents may have been set, therefore the limit of applicability to future situations should be determined. The Association's stated a position that was sympathetic to the need to redevelop and upgrade sub- standard buildings and economically distressed neighborhoods, such as Lionshead. It was noted that the Town of Vail has no urban renewal authority that confers the right on the municipality to condemn or pur- • chase land and buildings for the purpose of redevelopment. As a consequence, zoning incentives to stimu- late redevelopment must be equally applied to all property owners within a zone district. 2. Joan Lamb vs Vail Athletic Club: The Association's Amicus Brief has been filed with Eagle County District Court. Copies of the Amicus Brief have been forwarded to interested parties. Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorado 81658 EVHA 5/6/94 . According to Lamb's attorney Ron Robbins, the case wiil be heard in District Court before Judge Jones be- g'uining in June. '--.Lamb's complaint argues that the VAC Special Development District may not controvert the un- derlying zoning; the application fails to satisfy the purpose of Special Development Districts; it fails to meet criteria to establish an SDD; and that it constitutes spot zoning; The complaint requests the Court to issue an order to the Town of Vail that redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club SDD as approved be va- cated. The defendant argues that if the VAC was built according to zoning standards, it would still block the plaintiff view. As well, it argues that the Town of Vail followed correct procedure to approve the SDD. The defendant avoids the constitutional issues by seeking to limit the argument to compliance with the re- view criteria. In all likelihood the constitutionality issue will be dealt with on appeal should the court rule against the plaintiff. Copies of all filings are available. 3. Golden Peak House SDD: On March 15, 1994 Clark Willingham appeared before the Town Council at awork session. He informed the council that his Golden Peak House proposal to remodel sub- stantially the eYisting building was no longer financially feasible. Willingham after conducting a construc- tion budget review found that he would tose $1,736,000 on the remodel proposal. He informed the Council that he intended to tear dowm and rebuild the building according to the approved plan. He also rep- resented that the building could be lowered by an additional siY inches. At the work session the Town Attorney rendered an opinion specifying that Willingham's approv- al for the redevelopment plan was not conditioned upon it being a remodel or a demolition/rebuild. There- fore, the Town Council had no grounds to intervene or rehear the proposal. The opinion rendered by the Town Attorney is controversial and possibly subject to challenge. Willingham's dependence upon economics as an argument before the Town of Vail, for the approval of the proposed remodel, was well known and documented in the public record. His case for additional height,. GRFA, and view corridor encroachments were predicated on his representation of costs associated with a remodel.. The Town of Vail rejected any objections to the project based upon economic advantage, citing a prohibition in the zoning code (variance provision) that the Town cannot take the developer's costs into consideration. While on the other hand, the Town authorities allowed the developer to argue his need to make the project financially feasible. He renresented the need for additional GREA, beyond that permitted . by zoning standards, based upon the extraordinary costs associated with the remodeling the building. Using commonly known real estate values the Town of Vail approved additional GRFA valued at $6,897,000 ($1000/sq.ft.). The project included $6,151,500 ($900/sq.ft.) in new commercial square foot- age for a value of atl new square footage of $13,048,500. Willingham represented that the construction cost for the remodel to be an estimated $3 million. The Town had required an estimated $200,000 in cash outlay eYactions for employee housing and streetscape improvements. Willingham's proposal may receive an estimated 50% ($200,000) subsidy for the cost of providing required parking in the Town of Vail Vail , Village parking structure. Willingham revised remodel cost was an estimated $4.5-$5 million. Revised construction costs yzelds a profit value of the "remodel" approach (market value less re- development cost) was 61.5% or $8,048,500. The failure of the Town of Vail to differentiate in its ap- proval of the project between a"remodel" versus a"demolition/rebuild" yields an estimated profit value of 77.3%or $10,048,500. 2 , ' EVHA 5/6/94 During the review process the Town Attorney was queried by the Town Council as to whether a specific SDD proposal set precedent for future SDD proposals. The Town Attorney responded in the af- firmative. The prospect now exists that all buildings in Commercial Core I could reach five stories in . height and receive similar grants of GRFA and other special privileges. Further, there is the possibility that if the Town seeks to deny other property owners the same rights, it could be subject to legal challenge. Credible sources believe there is evidence to indicate that the Town of Vail may have been mislead by the representations of the developer and there may have been serious abuses of the review procedure. Privately, questions have been raised as to the degree of possible misconduct and the probability of legal action. A cloud remains in the public's mind over the legitimacy and implications of the Town of Vail's approval and subsequent decisions regarding this matter. Sources within the real estate community believe the approved project still has many controversial issues to resolve. Some of these issues may scuttle the project or send it back to the Town Council. For eYample, there is serious doubt that there are air rights that have been granted by the building's condomini- um association that would permit the construction of a fifth floor as proposed. According to some observers, the major flaw in the proposal is existing owners are expected to fi- nance the remodel with little or no gain in the floor area of their individual condominium units. Further, there is a question as to the building owners degree of participation in the profits from the expansion of the building's GRFA and commercial area. Some believe that the $1.5 million maintenance bond approved by the ownership last year, when combined with the $6.1 million value of increased commercial area (allowed under present zoning requirements) is sufficient finance incentive to fund the upgrading of the building without the need to add the fifth floor. The Association continues to monitor the progress of this matter. ' 4. Cornice Building SDD: After reducing the GRFA below that requested by the applicant the Town Council approved the SDD application. The on site employee housing units will be relocated else- ~ where in the community. The Association registered a complaint against the project as the proposal was a grant of special privilege. 5. SDD Initiative Petition Drive: There has not been a great enthusiasm to approve SDD's by public election. The Association's sponsorship of the distribution of the initiative petition to Vail voters, in conjunction with it's newsletters, has significantly affected the public's attitude towards the acceptability of SDD's. The contentious approval of the Golden Peak Hcuse, Vail Athletic Club, and Cornice building SDD's in conjunction with the initiative petition, the VAC lawsuit, and in depth reporting by the Associ- ation of the issue, has stirred a considerable public controversy. There is growing political pressure to eliminate or significantly restrict when SDD's can be used. Many property owners do not favor a public vote because it does not provide sufficient protection against SDD's. For eYample, suburban voters can approve SDD's for the city center because they are not directly affected. The preference of public opinion appears to be to limit the conditions under which SDD's can occur. In response to public pressure the Town Council has undertaken its effort to resolve the matter through legislative change. 3 EVHA 5/6/94 j It is recognized by many informed observers that if the Town Council or the District Court fails to take sufficient steps to curb the abuses of the SDD, an initiative petition can be undertaken that will limit or eliminate the SDD. Authorities within the real estate industry, who oppose the abusive use of the SDD and are supportive of the Association's position, believe that political action along these lines would be successful. These sources cite a growing public attitude, as the rate of development accelerates throughout the Vail Valley, to more stringently control growth and density. These attiiudes are similar to those prevalent in Vail during the ma.jor growth boom of the 1970's. The SDD Election Initiative Petitioners Committee terminated their activity to solicit signatures based upon the action taken by the Town Council to undertake the reform of the SDD legislation on a timely basis. Notice has been given to the Town Council of the action taken by the petitioners committee. The Association will continue through its newsletter to inform the property owners and electorate of the is- , sues and proceedings. • B. Joint EVHANaiI Associates/Town of Vail PlanninQ: 1. Neighborhood Meetings: A series of neighborhood meetings has been conducted between the Association and Vail Associates. a. Gore Creek Neighborhood: Fifteen people representing most of the major properties attended a planning work session to discuss improving the area from the east portal of the Vail Village Parking Struc- ture, Vail Road to Manor Vail including the Golden Peak ski base area. The scope of the meeting included improving pedestrian safety, parking, recrea.tion amenities, and streetscape improvements. The merits of a proposal by Mark Foster, President of the Vail Trail East Condominium Associ, ation, to explore the privatization of the e~cisting Gore Creek Drive (East of Vail Valley Drive) and Chalet Road street rights-of-way was received with interest and favor. The purpose of the privatization is to re- solve long standing parking problems in the neighborhood. Through a 1970's agreement with the Town of Vail neighborhood property owners cunently pay private contractors for maintenance and snow removal of the right-of-ways. The ability for neighborhood property owners to make aesthetic improvements to ex- isting parking areas was considered a positive outcome of obtaining ownership to rights-of-way. The pre- cedent used by the Town of Vail to vacate and deed to Manor Vail a nonessential ri¢ht-of-way was eYplained as a possible means to accomplish the neighborhood objectives. Discussed was the concept of a pedestrian access corridor on Gore Valley Drive (East of Vail Valley Drive) and Chalet Road. The pedestrian access route would be similar in design to Manor Vail's pedestrian access corridor. The purpose of the pedestrian access comdor would be to provide a safer route to the Golden Peak Ski Base Area than would be possible along Vail Valley Drive. Vail Associates agreed to work with the neighborhood to study the feasibility of the pedestrian corridor. The status of the existing tennis courts was discussed. The Vail Metropolitan Recreation District has expressed interest in consolidating their Golden Peak Tennis Courts at Ford Park. The District current- ly has a long term (99 year) lease with Vail Associates to provide tennis at Golden Peak. It was noted that Manor Vail has in the past expressed interest in acquiring or managing the two tennis courts adjacent to Chalet Road. Discussion included other types of recreational amenities such as an ice rink, and cultural facilities. It was concluded that there was a need to retain recreational amenities in the neighborhood. 4 EVHA 5/6/94 There was a willingness to explore alternative approaches to ownership, management, and operations of the tennis courts. Vehicular parking and access was an issue of concern. The feasibility of limiting the entire East Village to private parking was explored. Included in the discussion was the concept of an underground pri- vate parking structure at Golden Peak and the P-3 and J sites. The prospect of reducing public parking and it's accompanying traffic congestion and safety problems was favorably received. The benefits of placing a mass transportation terminal underground, beneath an ice skating/tennis facility was considered. Addi- tionally, the value of relocating skier drop off locations outside of neighborhood was viewed as a means of reducing a substantial cause of vehicular traffic congestion. b. Lodge at VaiWail Village Ski Base: A meeting between the Association's representa.tive and a group of condominium owners from the Lodge at Vail was held to discuss development options for the Vail Village Ski Base. The residential property owners are concerned with the impact that the proposed In- ternationa! Wing will have upon their condominium uiits. They were interested in the Homeowner's As- sociation discussion with Vail Associates and the Town of Vail regarding alternative uses for the Land Exchange site. The property owners were informed of Vail Associates preliminary site study that demonstrates the feasibility to locate physically an underground truck parking facility that could serve the delivery needs for Vail Village. It was presented that Vail Associates and the Town of Vail are studying the financial feasi- bility of the proposal and have informed officials at the Lodge at Vail of their interest in the concept. The owners gave an overview of the position of different interest groups within the Lodge at Vail. These interests include a desire to increase the hotel room inventory and improve on-site recreation and conference facilities. Concerns were expressed that the proposed International Wing would significantly damage the residential qualities and views from many condominium units in the Lodge at Vail and adjacent properties. The complexity of gaining approval for the International Wing was considered. Discussion included site design alternatives for a new hotel wing that could reduce or eliminate the loss of views and privacy from existing condominium residential units. 'I'he location of a skier and special event service facility needed by Vail Associates was considered. It was concluded that there were other design options available that warranted further investigation. It was concluded that it was desirable to pursue site planning options that eYpanded Eaton (Founders) Pla- za and protected existing views of Vail Mountain from the plaza. It was determined that opporh:nities eY- isted to eliminate the unsightly parking and service areas South of the Lodge at Vail. The blighted area could be replaced with an extension of the Vail Village pedestrian mall system that gives access to a new hotel wing, with retail, skier/visitor services, conference, and recreational amenities built above an under- ground parking and truck detivery facility. The Association was encouraged to investigate site locations for a 3 to 4 story hotel wing that would not block vistas from any existing residential units at the Lodge at Vail or from adjacent properties. It is desirable for the hotel wing to be connected to the emsting Lodge at Vail by structures from one to one and a half stories in height, built above the underground parking and truck docking facility. c. Mill Creek Circle: A meeting at the Caulkins residence sponsored by the Association was held with Mill Creek Circle property owners and Vail Associates. Vail Associates presented concepts that had been discussed for the redevelopment of their Golden Peak Ski Base Area. They reported on lift locations 5 EVHA 5/6/94 - ` and other on-mountain improvements being done in conjunction with their proposed Category III expansion. Vail Associates and a representative from the Association outlined a variety of ineans to eliminate traffic congestion and improve pedestrian access to the ski base areas. Concerns were stated by the neigh- borhood property owners regazding problems of illegal parking, nuisances resultirig from pedestrian tres- passing and special events. The blighted condition of the Vail Village Ski base as well as the overall appearance of Vail Village was discussed. A general dissatisfaction with the Town of Vail's handling of the Golden Pea1c House proposed redevelopment was stated.. A representative of Vail Associates stated the company's efforts to improve the visual appearance of the Vail Village Ski base would begin this summer. When completed, landscape and fencing to define road alignments will return the area to a park like setting. The representative stated that Vail Associates is no longer actively pursuing the development of their land south of Mill Creek Circle as a residential subdivision. The need to improve recreational amenities in the neighborhood, including the retention of eYisting Golden Peak Tennis Courts was discussed. The concept of the neighborhood taking over the operation and management of the tennis court from the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District was criticized. There was a reluctance to give up tax supported facilities that would result in increased cost to neighborhood property owners. An explanation was given of the Association's efforts with regard to truck parking and increasing private parking for Vail Village. The concept for the P-3 and J sites parking structure/park was outlined. As well, the general concepts for improvements to their Vail Village Ski Base area, including the prospect of an underground parking and truck docking facility. The feasibility of positioning a hotel wing in a more desirable location than the proposed International Wing was favorably received. There was a general rec- ognition that a redevelopment of the Land Exchange site and surrounding area could lead to a much needed upgrading of the entire Vail Village area. 2. Category III: As a demonstration of our concern, we provided mass mailing support services to Vail Association in the mailing of a brochure explaining the various aspects of Category III to the 1,500 property owners and Vail voters on the Association's mailing list. The mailing was done as an adjunct to the neighborhood meetings being sponsored by the Association. Vail Associates Category III proposal is receiving criticism from environmental,and wild life pres- , . ervation groups. Criticism is aimed at a big ski area getting bigger at the expense of wildlife habitat and other back country attributes. In Colorado there is a disdain for the urbanization that accompanies ski areas. Critics are tying the two issues together. They are attempting to pressure Vail Associates as well as local governments to provide for both wildlife and employee habitat. The joint planning efforts of the Association, Vail Associates, and the Town of Vail will define the community's obligations to provide support facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed ski ter- rain eYpansion. If the results of our joint planning efforts are unproductive, the chorus of critics could in- . crease in volume and intensity. 3. P-3 and J sites: Analysis continues of planning and design concept studies conducted by Vail Associates. It has been represented to Vail Associates and the Town of Vail, if normal size parking spaces (8' x 18' x 7'-6") can be used to accommodate van size delivery and service vehicles, the project is feasible. 6 ' EVHA 5/6/94 It has also been represented that the project would have to include provisions to meet the terms of the warranty deed to provide a- specified amount of parking to the Christiania Lodge. Further, the point has been made that once constructed, the continuation of large trucks parking on the parking structure surface or on adjacent street rights-of-way is unacceptable. It has been stated that for the project to be financially feasible the Town of Vail must bear the cost of constructing the park to be located on the surface of the parking structure. Requests have been made of Vail Associates and the Town of Vail to expedite their design requirements for the project, so that development interests may proceed with a fair degree assurance that a financially feasible project can be constructed. It has been noted that the purchase of the property or the review process should not proceed without prior agreements on design requirements by all concerned parties. C. Monitored Activities: The following are projects or activities the Association is monitoring. The Association has provided testimony, advice, attended meetings, or received reports regarding these topics. 1. Pav-in-lieu Parking Fee: The Town Council has partially acceded to the Association's position that the pay-in-lieu parking fee for Vail Village and Lionshead should not be used as a subsidy to develop- ment. In a recent action taken by the Town Council, they directed that an ordinance be prepared that would raise the fee from $8,594 to $15,000. Previous deliberation of the Council had set the fee at $10,000. The pay-in-(ieu fee will continue to subsidize development as the Town has not included the land costs in the fee calculation. 2. Covered Bridge Restoration: The Vail Village Covered Bridge will be restored and upgraded. Portions of the structure are in an advanced state of decay. Design consultants advocated a redesign of the bridges from it present rustic character to a Tyrolean architectural sTyle. The testimony of the As- sociation and other communiry groups advocated refurbishing the bridge, retaining its rustic character, while making safety; lighting, and landscape enhancements. The Town Council subscribed to the position advocated by the public testimony. 3. Covered Bridize Building Redevelopment• The redevelopment proposal for the site was ap- proved with no variances, view corridor encroachments, or special privilege. According to the building's developers it could be profitability redeveloped within zoning standards. The Association urged the neighboring property owner of the Gasthof Gramshammer, who also have plans to expand their building, to coordinate their proposed development efforts with the Covered Bridge building . All parties were urged to integrate building designs so that problems of loading and de- liveries could be resolved to the public benefit. These matters are still outstanding and are the subject of ongoing private negotiations. 4. Vail Village Noise Ordinance: The Town Council has been requested to find means to reduce nuisance noise levels in Vail Village. An ordinance is under consideration that vvzll restrict the practice of piping canned or live music to outdoor decks and other external areas, unless the entertainers are perform- ing outdoors. Outdoor music from the same location on a daily basis for several hours of extended per- formance has also been a source of complaint. The Association has urged action on this matter so that all sources of noise nuisances are reduced or eliminated. The Town Council decided to increase enforcement of offender ra.ther than cause the present ordinance to become more restrictive. 7 EVHA 5/6/94 ' 5. Traffic Roundabouts: The Town of Vail is moving forward with design work on a large round- about system at the Main Vail interchange with I-70. For the first time in history the Colorado Depart- ment of Transportation is supportive of the concept. There has been some local criticism of the roundabout proposal, but none of consequence to date. The Town is awaiting design and construction cost estimates, agreements on matching funding, and approval by the state department of transportation. Con- struction could still occur this year. 6. Ted Kindel Park: Design Review Board and Corps of Engineers approvals have been received Construction bids are due in next week. The Town of Vail's project manager is concemed that excessive labor costs, due to the high construction volume in the Vail Valley, may drive up costs beyond the project's $110,000 budget. A delay of a few weeks may result, as early season labor costs will drop once the con- struction season is undenvay, allowing the project to be built within budget. 7. Town Administration: In an effort to work more closely with the Town of Vail, the Association is working with the newly appointed Town Manager and Town Attorney to provide an informed back- ground on the history and development of the community. At the present time, an open and candid dia- logue exists: It is the intent of the Town Council and Town Manager to create a more open and customer ser- vice oriented organizational structure. There is evidence that a more cooperative, respectful, and respon- sive working relationship between municipal employees and the community is growing. D. Affiliated Issues: In fulfillment of the conclusions of the President's Advisory Committee meet- ing in December for the Association to be concerned with issues effecting the larger community the follow- ing issues have been monitored. • 1. Town CounciUPlanning Commission Growth Policv Conflict: a. Alpine Design Issue: A considerable controversy is beginning to take shape regarding a desire by a majority of the Town Council to define the architectural elements of Alpine Design. The design codes of the Town refers to requirements that building design must be compatible with the features of "Alpine design. The topic of "design" has received greater attention due to controversial contemporary designs that have occuned in some residential neighborhoods and Lionshead. At a recent summit of the Town Council, Design Review Board, and Planning Commission there was heated discussions as to the urgency to define an "Alpine" architecture vocabulary. The meeting un- leashed frustrations thaf are symptomatic of the alienation between elected and appointed officials regard- ing redevelopment and growth related issues. . The frustration is created by a rapidly changing attitude of the electorate and property owners to increase controls over development and growth. Hyper-inflation in the rate of growth is fueling the change ~ in attitude. A majority of the Town Council is set on a course to tighten and equalize development regu- lations, while the Planning Commission and planning staff are attempting to enforce planning criteria for- mulated in the 1980's to stimulate growth by granting special privilege in exchange for exactions. There appears to be a reluctance on the part of some appointed officials to revise planning criteria to reflect changing values. Some appointed officials are counseling delay with the hope of frustrating the issue until the next Town Council election, eighteen months hence. Clear divisions are beginning to take place within the real estate and development professions regarding the ethical issues of special privileges and equal treatment. In the coming months there will be a heighten public debate over the issue of the 8 - EVHA 5/6/94 failure of the present planning policy to solve development problems. The debate will include protections that ensures the public trust provides equal protection and opportunity for property owners in the same or similar zone districts It has been advised that research be conducted to accurately define the traditional and contempo- rary international architectural styles that are encompassed within "Alpine" design. Secondly, that in recal- citrant areas of the community such as Lionshead, where deterioration occurs and property values have stagnated, research should be conducted to determine the consequence of opening the opportunity to in- crease commercial and residential density caps for "all" property owners, so that an area can "grow" out of stagnation. The Association is closely monitoring this issue as it is a fundamental debate with broad implica- tion for governmental control and property owner self deternunation. 2. Open Soace: a. West Vail: Pressure on undeveloped parcels in West Vail is fornung public opinion towards open space preservation. The Spraddle Creek subdivision north of Vail Village remains a source of contro- versy and derision. West Vail property owners are using public pressure to cause the Town Council to ne- gotiate the purchase of the 48 acre Trapper's Run parcel. The Intermountain neighborhood is organizing opposition to an attempt to upzone a 2.49 acre primary/secondary zone district to Low Density Multi- Family. The applicant is being represented by a planning commissioner. b. Lindholm Land Exchanee: This proposed congressionally mandated legislative land exchange is planned to abut the Town of Vail's northwest boundary above West Vail. The proposal is meeting with circumspection by the Vail Town Council. The consequences of the land eYChange because of its massive scale are not well understood by the general public. In all likelihood it will move greater concentrations of population closer to Vail causing the devel- opment of residential subdivision similar in consequence to Spraddle Creek. There is a high probability that the land will be annexed to the Town of Avon, beginning the process to narrow the ambitions of the Town of Vail's westward eYpansion. The availability of real water supply should be an obvious concern given the projected shortage of water supply being touted by local water authorities. 3. Affordable HousinQ: a. Vail Commons/Affordable Housing• A request for proposal has been solicited for the 6.6 Vail Commons site in West Vail, the proposal is to be an expansion of the West Vail commercial center and in- clude eighty employee housing units. In a recently released report of the Town of Vail's mission and goals the following statement was made regarding affordable housing. "Encourage through zoning improve- ments/changes/modifications our ability to stabilize the local population, thereby increasing voter base." The legitimacy of government encouraging local housing to increase the voter base is arguab(e. b. Emplovee HousinQ as SDD Esactions: An article in the local press regarding the Town of Vail's effort to encourage employee housing by requiring restricted employee housing units approved as a result of SDD's was less than successful. Several of the units remain vacant by action of the property owner. 9 , EVHA 5/6/94 ' • 4. Tax Issues: , a. Performance Center: A committee continues the efforts to built a performance center in Vail. The committee is advocating a 900 seat, $5 million facility at Lionshead. The financial pro forma for the defeated Performance and Conference Center was predicated on an estimated $8 million in endowments and contribution. It is unknown if a similar level of private donations are available. It is believed by some ex- perts in the performing arts that at least 2,100-2,500 seats are needed for a facility to be financially self supporting. There remains a strong interest in locating a performance center in conjunction with the Ford Amphitheater at Ford Park. b. Tax Research: Research has found that the property taac mill levy for governmental entities providing services is 30.110 mills in the Town of Aspen. The mill levy for Vail Village in the Town of Vail is 55.041 mills. Research continues into the differences in tax assessment, expenditures, service lev- els, and demographic profiles. E. Organizational: 1. EVHA Newsletter: The first quarter newsletter was circulated to 2,500 people including Vail Village property owners and Vail voters. The newsletter appears to have been favorably received as it evoked several phone calls, letters, contributions, and comments. The second quarter newsletter will be prepared and distributed in June. 2. Affiliated memberships: The Association has been requested to accept "Affiliated Member- ships" from property owners and organizations who are outside of the Association's membership area. An Affiliated membership is considered a nonvoting organizational membership. The dues rate is the same as an individual or organizational membership, $1000. 3. Contributions: The Association is gratified and appreciative of the contributions that were re- ceived from local property owners and voters expressing support for the Association's activities and news- letter. 10 , ~ ; . i!? TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 MEDIA ADVISORY FAX 303-479-2157 May 11, 1994 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn ' Community Information Office 479-21 15 VAIL TOWN COl1NCIL HIGHLIGHTS FOR MAY 10 Work Session Briefs . --Site Visit to 274 Beaver Dam Road This is a town-owned parcel with covenant restrictions. The parcel is identified in the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan as property that could be sold to generate revenues for other open lands purchases as long as the property remains permanently restricted as open space. An adjacent property owner has asked the Council to consider selling the property with permanent restrictions in the form of conservation easements, which would maintain open space. Because the land was originally donated to the town by Vail Associates, the Council expressed an interest in discussing the proposal with VA. A survey also was authorized at town expense to enable the town to better understand the boundaries of the property and any improvements that have been made. The Council also directed staff to inform adjacent property owners of the proposal and to notify the neighborhood group for this area. Councilman Merv Lapin said a philosophical discussion would likely be necessary to determine if the town should. be disposing of any open space for whatever reason. For more information, contact Russell Forrest in the Community Development Office at 479-2138. --Update Eagle Mine Superfund Clean-Up The Council heard an update on the Eagle Mine Clean-up by representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Colorado Department of Health and the Eagle River Environmental & Business Alliance (EREBA). Although a clean-up workplan is continuing under a 1993 state consent decree, Council members were told that additional mitigation activities mandated by the EPA could face delays this summer. . That's because a 3-party consent decree between the EPA, state and Paramount Communications has not been signed. Paramount is the company responsible for paying the cost of the clean-up. Similar problems delayed the clean-up process last year. As a result, the Council agreed yesterday to send a letter to the EPA urging completion of the negotiations. A copy of the fetter will be sent to Colorado's (more) . t ~ TOV Highlights Add 1 Congressional representatives. The EPA has ordered remediation actions that will cost approximately $17.3 million over 10 years. For a 3-page summary of the Eagle Mine Clean-up activities, contact the town's Community Information Office at 479-21 15, or call Russell Forrest in the Community Development Office at 479-2138. --PEC Report In briefing the Council on the May 9 meeting of the Planning and Environmental . Commission (PEC), Community Development Director Kristan Pritz said the PEC had approved a conditional use permit to allow for continuafiion of an outdoor dining deck at Garton's Saloon, 143 East Meadow Drive. The permit is good for a year. The Council directed staff to strictly enforce the conditional use, in addition to the saloon's amplified sound permit. For more information, contact Randy Stouder in the Community Development Department at 479-2138. --Installation of Heated Pavers at Gore Creek Promenade The Council heard a presentation from Public Works/Transportation Director Larry , Grafel and expressed interest in forming a public-private partnership for installation of heated pavers at the Gore Creek Promenade. Grafel estimated the cost at $143;000, plus an annual operating expense of $15;000. Although the heated walkway would reduce the town's snow removal costs, Grafel said he couldn't be any more specific about the savings until he prepared a payback analysis. The presentation then turned to a broader discussion of heated pavers throughout the Village. The Council wondered about the feasibility of expanding the heated paver system to Bridge Street and Gore Creek Drive. Based on projections for the promenade project, a 70,000 sq. ft. extension through the core could cost about $1.4 million, with an annual operating expense of $150,000. Most Council members said it would make sense to install a heated system in conjunction with utility work or other construction activities that would already require the streets to be torn up. The question of funding is a major issue. The Council discussed several•options, including a public-private partnership. -Rob LeVine, a former Council member who manages the Antlers Lodge, urged the Council to address infrastructure problems in Lionshead rather than spend additional money in the Village Core. The Council directed Grafel to prepare a list of town- - funded improvements scheduled for the Lionshead area this year, and to continue development of additional recommendations related to the heated pavers. For more information, contact Grafel at 479-2173. --Council Reports/Vail Valley Marketing Board Councilman Jan Strauch gave an update on the summer marketing plan. A budget is attached. - (more) w ~ TOV Highlights Add 2 --.Council Reports/Sister Cities Trip to St. Moritz, Switzerland The Council agreed to spend up to $3,000 from the town's unallocated marketing fund to help pay for a proportionate share of expenses related to a"Vail Night" presentation for residents of St. Moritz; development of a commemorative Vail-St. Moritz pin; plus a gift to be presented to the community. of St. Moritz. The Town of Avon and Vail Associates also will be asked to contribute towards the $3,000 budget total. Those making the July trip will include electeci officials from Vail and Avon, plus representatives from the Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau, Vail Valley Marketing Board, Vail Associates Inc., Colorado Mountain College and the Vail Valley Arts Council. The trip will be used to develop new strategies for marketing and special events activities valleywide. For more information, contact Suzanne Silverthorn in the Community Information Office at 479-21 15. # # # , . _ <<,: u TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Department of Community Developmeyit Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21381479-2139 FAX 303-479-2452 May 11, 1994 Mr. Jeff Sheppard Roth and Sheppard Architects 1623 Blake Street, Suite 350 Denver, CO 80202 RE: The Town of Vail Police Addition . Dear Jeff: The intent of this letter is to clarify a few points of your letter to Kristan Pritz and Jeff Layman dated April 20, 1994 regarding the Police Building siding and the garage door. The Design Review Board (DRB) did agree to allow a metal garage door to be located at the entry to the covered parking for the Police addit+on. The DRB has required that the garage door be painted, however, the final decision on the paint color will be determined by the DRB at the time paint samples are placed on the door for their review and final decision. Let me know when this occurs and I wiii schedule a site visit with the DRB at their next regularly scheduled meeting. For your information, the Town Council has decided to allocate additional funding to replace all of the existing T-111 siding on the existing Municipal Building. The T-111 will be replaced with similar "real wood" siding that is currently being installed on the Police addition. The DRB and the Town Council were both very clear that they would like all of the new wood siding to be clear coated. No dark brown stain is to be used on any of the new siding. However, the DRB did approve for the soffit, fascia, and window trim to be painted dark brown. The above information has all been confirmed with Jeff Layman. Should you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contacf ine at 479-2138. , Sincerely, Mike Mollica Assistant Director of Planning xc: Bob McLaurin Ken Hughey. Town Council. Design Review Board Kristan Pritz Jeff l.ayman ~S 5(D • ~,qo. ~,u,tt, 0 VAIL VALLEY MARKETING BOARD 1994 BUDGET RECAP FUNDING Town of Vail Business License Fee $ 357,000 Admin Fee (5$) - 17,850 Beaver Creek Resort 100,000 Town of Avon 50,000 Vail Associates , 50,000 Corillera 5,000 Arrowhead 2,500 Summer Magazine Rebate 12,750 Interest 5,000 $564,400 INVESTMENTS National Advertising $120,000 1/6th Page B&W ads 15 Magazines Groups/Meetings 153,000 Balance Vail Valley Convtn Kit $28000 Trade Ads $52,000 Trade Shows $10,000 Direct Mail/top 5000 $25,000 Front Range $13,500 - Tele-Marketing $10,000 Production/Miscll $14,500 Public Relations 50,000 Front Range , 10,000 AA Summer Flight Schedule 21,000 55,000 Magazine wraps 0 Dallas trade mission $7,000 2 American Way 4-color co-op ads $14,000 Postage 60,309 Agecy Fee 65,000 Production/Photography 25,000 Research 38,500* Miscellaneous 21,591 $564,400 * '94 Conversion Study $35,000 - '93 Attitude Study Retabs 700 '94 Occupany/Rate Study 2,500 Other 300 ~ S i r . , C' V TOWN OF VAIL MEMOR.ANDUM TO: Robert McLaurin Council Members FROM: Judy Popeck DATE: May 17, 1994 RE: Investment Report Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of April 30, 1994. On April 15th, a FNMA matured for $160, 000 and was used for the monthly payment for the police construction. Also, a$1,000,000 FHLB matured on April 19th and a$1,500,000 FFC matured on April 21st. Both of these were used to purchase a$2,500,000 FHLM on April 27th with a yield of 3.734$. The estimated average yield for the debt service fund was 3.01$ and 4.25$ for the pooled cash fund. Currently the yield curve for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year are 4.11$, 4.69%, and 5.16$ respectively. Please call me if you have any questions. , ~ Town of Vail, Colorado Investment Report Summary of Accounts and Investments Forthe Month Ending'April 30, 1994 Balances Percentage 04/30/94 of Total Money Market Accounts (see page 1) Commercial Banks $23,619 0.12% Money Market and Mutual Funds $5,041,365 24.82% Colorado Investment Pools $3,960,115 19.50% Total $9,025,099 44.44% Commercial Savings Banks & Loans Certificates of Deposit (see page 2) Eagle County Institutions 0.00% Other Colorado Institutions $297,000 $297,000 1.46% National Institutions 0.00% Total , $297,000 $297,000 1.46% Percentage of Portfolio in Savings & Loans 0.00% U.S. Govemment Securities (see page 3) , Treasury Notes & Bilts - $1,283,836 6.32% GNMA's $88,883 0.44% U.S. Savings Bonds ~ $25,371 0.12% Federal Agency Discount Notes & Bonds $9,587,938 47.21% Total $10,986,028 54.09% Total Portfolio $20,308,127 100.00% Maturing Within 12 Months $18,572,729 91.45% Maturing Within 24 Months $622,065 3.06% Maturing After 24 Months $1,113,333 5.47% $20,308,127 100.00% 5/13/94j1p invsm4 , Money Market Accounts as of April 30, 1994 -For the Month of April-- Institution Balances Type of Accounts High Low Average 04/30/94 CON9NERClAL BANK ACCOUNTS ~ First Bank of Vail - Operating Interest 3.190°/a 2.730% 2.890% $645 Balance $2,625,776 $146,941 $759,757 - First Bank ot Vail - Insurance Interest 3.190% 2.730% 2.890% $1,033 Balance Colorado National Bank Super Now Account Interest 2.330% General Operating Account Balance $21,941 Total Commercial Bank Accounts $23,619 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS ~ Colorado Trust Housing Bond Proceeds interest 3.270% , Balance $868,971 CSAFE - Bond Proceeds - Police Construction Interest 3.340% Balance $236.258 CSAFE Interest 3.340% Balance $2,854,886 i Total Local Government Investment Pools Accounts $3,960,115 MONEY MARKET FUNDS , First American Corp. Trust Treasury Fund Bond Reserve Interest 2.976% Balance . , $1,353,699 Fidelity Investment Govemment Money Market Accounts Interest 3.170% Bond Issue Reserve Account Balance $275,110 Interest 3.500% Operating Account Balance $2,347,933 Overland Express . 8alance $1,064,623 Total Money Market and Mutual Funds ~$5,041,365 Total all accounts $9,025,099 "Account Subjeci to Arbitrage Rebate 5/13/94j1p invmm4 Page 1 Certificates of Deposit ~ as of April 30, 1994 Bank Name, Location ~ Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value BestBank, Thornton Colorado FDIC 4.750% 4.600% 16-Feb-93 13-Feb-95 289 $99,000 Paonia State Bank, Paonia Colorado FDIC 4.400% 4.250% 17-Aug-93 15-Feb-95 291 $99,000 Bank of Greeley, Greeley Colorado FDIC 4.250% 4.000% 16-Jun-93 16-Jun-94 47 $99,000 Avg Yield 4.283% $297,000 r invcd4 5/13/94j1p Page 2 J ' ~ Govemment Securities as of April 30, 1994 "'Treasury Notes & Bills"' Days to Days Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity to Book Par Type Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value TNote Pooled 4,250% 4.340% 17-May-93 15-May-96 1094 746 $499,079 $500,000 TBill 8and Proceeds 3.360% 25-Oct-93 22-Sep-94 332 145 $101,663 $103,000 TBill Bond Proceeds 3.390% 25-Oct-93 240ct-94 364 177 $61,029 $62,000 Zero Pooled, 7.820°,6 21-Jun-91 15-Nov-95 1608 564 $622,065 $700,000 AverageYieid 5.90°k $1,283,836 $1,365,000 Average Days to Maturity 408 "'GNMA'S"' Years to Estimated Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Principal Pool Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding 5803 8.000% 8.480°k ~ 14Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 16.00 $27,423 • 13003 8.000°k 9.500% 240ct-86 95-Oct-06 20.20 17.00 $28,162 14659 8,000°k 9.200% 24-Oct-86 15-Jan-07 21.20 18.00 $33,298 Avg Yield 9.073% $88,883 "'U.S. Savings Bonds"' Years to Issue Maturity Maturity Years to Book Maturity Series Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value EE ~7.170% 01-Oct-86 01-Oct-96 10.00 2.42 $25,371 $30,000 '•'Federel Agency Discount Notes & Bonds"' Days to Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Book Maturity Agency Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value FFC Pooled 3.560% 3,641 °r6 07-Jun-93 ~ 01-Jun-94 359 ~ 32 $499,966 $500,000 FNMA Bond Proceed 3.230% 25-Oct-93 09-May-94 196 9 $254,819 $255,000 FNMA Bond Proceed 3260°k 25-Oct-93 06-Jun-94 224 37 $224,280 $225,000 FNMA Pooled 3.582°k 01-Mar-94 28-Jun-94 119 59 $497,170 $500,000 FFC Bond Proceed 3.320°k 25-Oct-93 18-Ju1-94 266 79 $387,259 $390,000 FDMC Pooled 3.992% 01-Mar-94 28-Nov-94 272 212 $488,772 $500,000 FHLB Pooled 3.551°,6 18-Mar-94 17-May-94 60 17 $998,446 $1,000,000 FHLB Pooled 1614% 30-Mar-94 31-May-94 62 31 $2,991,115 $3,000,000 FHLB Bond Proceed 3.361 % 25-Oct-93 15-Aug-94 294 107 $252,523 $255,000 FHLM Pooled 3.734% 27-Apr-94 27-May-94 30 27 $2,493,588 $2,500,000 FHLM Pooled 4.560% 4.560% 03-Jun-93 03-Jun-96 1096 765 $500,000 $500,000 $9,587,938 $9,625,000 Average Yield 3.67% Average Days to Maturity 125 Total $10,986,028 5/13/94j1p invtr4 Page 3 ~ SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ~ 5-11-84 13,16'3033287207i 3034792157;# 1/ . : >'ti:' a . l ~~:••A A• t:MILr. ~.f)uN1'Y Dki11t7tritG c,r~ ir_t; cW. 11, 199 4 - 10:04 sna riieoaDwAY C.t>UNfYMANRGER • : • P.O.IiCJXB!"i0 (,iaiJ 328•80V5 ~ r.nta.r.,c'c71.O1:At.r[?Alci3t-dii50 rAk, (303) 3J.R-77Ci7 . J EAGLE COCiIUTY, COLORApO 11llEMURANpUM ~ fl I I Y0: Alf inedia and interested partie FROM: Jacic E1. Lew(s, Cflunty Manager - aATE: hllay 71, 1994 - 10:04 RE: GHANCESr70 AGENdA,,FDEi` ,()ARD 0F COMMISSIOIVERS f 7. The fol{vwing item;has been added;!:to the'rMay'17 dgenda. ? OA~:DQ -~4:15 PD+293-D4-AF-CdRDILLERA, LO7 40, FIIING 2 i Community Developmsnt ACTI.ON: ..~~rtsitler a re'quesf #or an Amended Fina1 Plat adjusting the ;'plattedFbuildin;g"eny~lope. ~ If you have any questions please . ce[l~Tom Jen,kins;' Offic'e As$istant at 328-8605. Thank you! . JDL/tj i j co: Board of Caunty Comrnissioners`; James FI. rritz~, GQUn`ty 'Attorr.te y` , ,f ~ • Allen Sartin; Finance Director Sara Fisher ) Clerk & Racorder ~ Jack ingstad, Public Informatiori Officer , . ~ . . . . . . . , 7 I . . C~'. . . . . t . I ~ 3 .,t.~.. J • . I ~ r i . . . - , , . . - . . . 1 .n , ~ : . . , . . I I ~ ' ..i..! . . _ , , _ _ _ i G1WF511DOMFRAh1CE51ivffMUWAND.AGe i SENT BY-EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-16-94 ; 14:3$ ; 'E3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 4 ~ : May 16, 1994 - 13:35 ~ , ~ [AGIt- COUNTY BUIIl31NU i~. : - OFFICE OF 1'!* 551 HRC?ADWAY P.D Box s5o &3ARU UF COMI4ILSSIt~NtRS ~ ~ - .:i FAGLE.-fULORAf]fJ 81631 (303) 3 2818605 , :~i•"' • ; fAK: ()03J 328•7207 EAGlE GOllNTY, COLORADO , AGEND,A? BOARD OF.~oUNT~ Mi~~~ONERS ~ . REG'uLAR;MEFriNG aAY MAY 2_3;. , .-1,994 1 . '...i, . _ . . ,1. 'j~. 08:30 - 70:00 WQRIC SESSIb.N~='='1NEE:ICLY UPDATE ~ Mfte1rMHdyC.ocaqoom .:Jaick p: Leiivis, County Manager 1 a:U(J - 90:30 6REAK , 10:30 - 11:30 ' VUOaIC SESSION;-'FENa1NG LITIGATlON Mtofth°uMYc~m li,„m '.:lames R,_ Fritze, County Attorney . . :G... _ . , 'I 1:30 - 12:00 WOFtK SESSI(JN - MEETlNGS ATTEABUEp ? Mc or me nav cram aoom • 72:00 - 09:75 LUNCH . _ . _ f I i ~ 01: 15- IQ1:45 JAIL INSPECTlON eaalo Cmmfy ruKla Cemer 01:45 - 02:15 -AGREEMENT BtTWEEN IEALILE COtlNTY, STA7"E bF EeolecowcyRoom CULQRAb0 ANd RICK' EVANCHQ FQR PRORERTY !'l1RCl-fASE ~ Mike Bradley, Building and Grounds I ~ : . . ~ C:IWP61lb0C5UVfAY23.A(aN - ~ - . SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ~ 5-16-94 ; 14:38 ~ I 3033287207y 3034792157;# 2/ 4 • . { ~ ~ 02:15 - 02:20 CONSENT CALENaAFt Eaple Courrty qapm I Name of a r{nJtlfW lxld non-canVOVpIWpl MlW1 ere Pincad on thp ¢41wnt cdandar to Aqpyy ay gosy ~ COUray CO/llthimdonme to apq~p i18 lime md a~rpy ON t11ma ~pal~i itoma on 4 ierytlN opm~d0. AnY Commdaor~ mW reqtbeet that an ium ba "NEMOVED'~fiom ihe conoutt talendu wd cenc6Wo0 swvaateH. My wptber of the p~tic MeY 'REQUEST• crry itmn ps °REMOVM' from tM tombx ,q~,dd 1. BILL PAY't1VG - FOR WEEK OF MAY 23. & lUTAY 30. 7994 . LInda Pzinkuch, Accaunting Mark Silverthorn, Contrbller ACTlpN: Appioval subject ta review by the Gounty Manager. 2. PAI ROI:L FOR MAY 26, 1994 i~ ~ Jack D. Lewis, Caunty Manager ACTION: Approval subject ta review by the Caunty N1ana er. 3. ...._AG~EPTANCE-OF--P,4'VEIVlENT MANAGEMENT SU RV'EY " :!?RQPOSAL'~'(~?R PAVEti EAGLE COUNTY ROA17 aon Fessler, RQad aiid Bridge IICTlON: Consider approuai. 4. BID ACCEPTANCE.FaR OIVE 1994. 77 YARb, TWd AX[.E , ELEVATENG TR/.1CTOR SCRAPER Bill Srri th~ Motor Pool ~ ACTION: Consider approvat. . 41 , . a5. BID rACCEPTANCE FOR UNE COLOR COPIER , Alicfa Holder, Pur.c asin$ ; ACTION: Consider approval." . . . ; f. RESOLUTION'~':AUTH~~IIZlNG SUBST1TUTtON pF C47Ll:ATERAL- AIND RElEASE QF DEEU OF TRUST AND PROIVIISSORY NOTE FOR THE HQMEST"EAD, FIUNG NUNtBER 1 _ _ . . , ` L8t'r'y MetteriliCk,'. oun#y Engineer ACTiORt: , Cor~sider ap~rt~val.~4. ,~,r 7. ~4GREEM~.NT~ BE7WEEIV~ flEAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF CO'L'URADO....-A,ND... S.ILVERADO ROPING FOR EIVTERTAINlUILNT,: AT THE EAGLE CpUN7Y PICNIC Jk1NE 10, 1994 . , . J , • Kathy Ea$tley, Hu ~ an Resources ACT1QN: Consider approval: . . ..,r.._, ~n~.. C:1VYP511DOCS1MnY23.AGN - . . , . , ' ~Fr - . . { ~ : ; ' SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-16-94 ; 14:39 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 3/ 4 ~ r 8. AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY, STATE dF COLQRADt7 AND [.QMAR PUDBERSEK FQR ENTERTAINMENT AT THE EAGLE CQl„1NTY P1CNIC JUMJE 10,1994 ' Kathy Eastley, Wuman Re$ources ACTIOIV: Cansider approvat. 9. QGREEMElVT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORAC]O AND,,EAGLE COUNTY 4-H COUNCfL FOR CA7ERING THE EAGLE CpUNTY PICNIC JUNE 10, 1994 (tabled frr,m 5/1 6194) Kathy Eastley, Human Resaurces ACTIaN: Consider apprwwal. :t 02:20 - 02.45 A. ...=...-FIF~S~-,REl~Dd~t~1G~-(?F-T~E-#~RDINANCE APPftOV1111 j THE - Ewle comw Room INTERGOrlERNMENTI#L AfaREEMENT BETWEEN EAGLE CC.fUi?fTY, STATE QF COLURADQ AND 7HE R ARING FORK 7RANSIT A?GENC'Y ,lomes R. Fritzc, County Attorney ACTION: Consider approval. B. VIIILLITS LANE INTERSECTICIN AGREEMENT James R. Fritze, County Attorney ACTtON: Corisid'er approvai. C. ACCEP'TANCE , OF ANNUQL V1lILDFIRE OPERATIN PLAN FOR EAGLE COIJNTY 1994 A.J. Johnson, Sherlff ACTION: Can$id'er appraval: . „ D. 1994 EAGLE COUNTY 'GUARDRAIL CONTRACTS l.arry Mettb,rnick, Engineering . ACTtC1N: ! Cqnsider appravai,: , . . I E. HANGAR LEASE AT QIRpCIRT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY STATE OF COLO'RqpQ pND STEVE JONES AND LEE I LECHNER ~ Dan 114ynold8, Airport ~ AC"~7QN: ! Consid~ar appraval. . . F. ~ AGREEMENT BETINEEN EAGLE COUNTY AND MIDWEST AIR TF$AFFiC CQNTROL .sSeRVICES FQFi TOWER eAND WEATHER {JBSERVATIONS SERVICES ; . aan aeyn4lds, Airpbrt ACTION: Corisider app'raval: C:IWP61lDOCS1MAY?3.AGN . . 4 i . r f . . . . SENT BY-EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-16-94' ; ~4:39 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 4/ 4 . . 1 . . „ G. RES~~tUTtaN AVTHORIZING RELEASE OFCOI.LATERAL IN FOHM OF N4TE ANl? DEED OFTRUST AND ACCEPTANCE OF ~HECIG AS COLLATERAL FtJR WARRANTY PERIOD ANDI COMMEIVCEMENT OF 1NARRANTY PERIQD FCjFt Ei4GI LE @-!lLLS SUBDIVfS10N Larry Metterniclc, Engineering ACTION: Consider appraval, H_ RESOLU7rON APPRQVING FAIRGRCIUNUS AGREEI4fIEN7S FOR. COMPAIVIES FISHING AND RAFTING AT EAGLE CDUNTY FAIRGROUNDS ' Mike Bradley. Building and Grounds 'GTIOIV: Consider approva(. ~ ~i. . , E~ESO~Ed~-!QRl-~v-NCEf~b~llVGTHECOUNT'Y'SREDEMPTI N . OP ::CERTIFfCATEi7 OF PURCHASE RESULTING FROM EARONEdUS SALE FOCi '1'AX UENS 14ND AUTHOaIZING TREASURER TO PAY INTt-REST ON SA1D RED?EMPTIOlVS FRQM GENERAL FUND Sherry Brandoti, Treasurer ; ~ ACTlON: GQnsider, approval: ( I 02:45 - 03:00 BREQ6( . ; . . ,.J . _ 03:00 - 04:00 ROARD OF SQCIAL SERVICES Ew°Ccurgy aooin ,;tKathleen.'Forinash," Director of Sacial Services 04:00 - 05:00 LI+QUQA LICENSE HEAR11VG5 FaqleCeuntM i. RENEWi4L - GVI/EIVDOLYhI BRAATZ dba FIRESIDE LOpPE ii. RENEWAL -.YARNlQNY, INC. dba $TATE SRIUGE Lt]DGE iii. RENEWAL - TRtPLE T ENTERPRI$E, INC dba EL JEBEL GAS AN[7..TIRE iv• NEW 7AVERN -~GEMSA CORPORATIQlV dba CORDILLE A GOLF..CLUB ; .;Earlene Raach, C'ounty Liqtjar Inspector ACTlON: +Cpns+der approval,.: . . ~ . . . THE P/EXT MEETlNG F THE GLE l'Ot1NTY COryqMI,WpNERS YUILL 9E HQD dIJ NAAY 31, 7D04 TMI9 AQENPA 19 PROVIDEU FO INPOFwinnonru. PUrtr•oeRS ppLY • AlL 71M2S MC AF•FRdXIMh7e. TFiE BdARD WiilLf`IM SESSIN MhY CdN5lUEH OTHER ITEM3 THAT ARE BROUGNT BEFORE tT. 1 i CriWPFi71[)tl4`S1MAY23.AGM I , f ~ - ary Clinton contended that "we lack at eC'• some core level meaning in our indi- Se vidual lives and meaning collectively" er . ...~•~4ti.., a ni - will go l) f _,w, and that she aspires to "the sense that d: ~_ti~;~~!~.f~m ~ ~ our lives are part of some greater ef- dc. fort, that we are connected to one an- ~ •e ~ . in; other . . . part of something bigger ; a:~ ` •~"".r>`~ , i than ourselves." She called for the •.'c1Y" . b°° a N'~t to engage in millions of con- ~ ~e1;,~ „q,,~,; ~T•q~*, country ~ ' ~,!F,,~•' '~~•e' ` versations . . . about how we break A 1V1 o~" •~%~''b y~~ through old, views and deal with new • n problems.' Not everyone sees citizen discus- <<' sion groups as the answer to our na- 110( ~-~.e ~ cle:. . N ~ • tion's troubles, however. It s highly un- ~w;~ •fiQ~~~ h~h~~~~eri~'"~~;• likely that these national conversations thr( ,~p _ g~ o•~ will lead to any kind of ineaningful t he s c~~ ~ consensus, contends Leon Wieseltier f'ra~ ~ ~ . ~ • , l • in The New Republic (July 19, 1993). Clii J . ~p ' eAe S,~ ~ vs ae Z lt'il( rv ti., wy ~r o ' Scathingly critical of the Clintons, < ~ ~'~i • 'i, Lerner, and Etzioni, Wieseltier says ~ tior that all this emphasis on a national 7 bo, c conversation leads one to think that ~ . "truth is nothing more than consen- `c dret ~ sus." According to Wieseltier, "the Fo'' problem with conversation as an idea, CAN C~TIZEN DIALOGiTES in philosophy and politics, is that fre- " quently it is a principle of stalling. It •~`S II ~ FORGE NATIONAL IDENTITY? p cious of dec s ons and onclus o ss ` It recommends processes and meet- National Endowment for the Humanities ings. It is a weapon against urgency. It launches discussion forums dreams that there is a little bit of truth in everything." . Rather than one common good, n an effort to engage citizens in a permeable boundaries, and that the there are many, Wieseltier insists. He I dialogue about who we are as a meaning of any particular identity will points out that democracy is designed nation and what holds us together, change over time." Hackney hopes I for disagreements, not consensus, and the National Endowment for the Hu- that a national conversation will make ~ recommends "a sharpening of distinc- manities launched citizen discussion Americans' common ground more evi- i tions and a war of ideas, followed by forums around the country last winter. dent, allowing for ihe freedom to cele- what used to be known as leadership." A group of scholars selected by the brate our differences while at the same Wieseltier sees very little meaningless- NEH later met to discuss the results of time forging a"dynamic national iden- ness in our society: "The contempo- these gatherings and recommend what tity." He ended his presentafion by ~ rary problem is not that people believe to include in citizen discussion kits, quoting from President Clinton's in too little, it is that they believe in which the NEH intends to make avail- speech at the Holocaust Memorial ~ too much," he writes. "Too much of able to people who are interested in Museum dedication: "We must find in j what too many people believe is too hosting conversations in their commu- our diversity our common humanity. ;i easily acquired and too thoughtlessly nities. The Endowment also will pro- We must reaPfirm that common hu- 1 held. Americans are choking on iden- vide approximately $I million to manity, even in the darkest and deep- tities. Not the lack of ineaning, but the groups and organizations interested in est of our own disagreements." glibness of ineaning, is the trouble." sponsoring bieger -atherings. Implicit in a search for a common The NEH plan also came under NEH chairman Sheldon Hackney humanity is the assumption that there ~ attack in a recent New York Times outlined his notion of American plu- is a common good toward which we (Jan. 30, 1994) op-ed piece by Richard ralism in a speech to the Nationa] should all aspire. This is the antithesis Sennett, a professor of humanities at Press Club last fall: "There is an of rampant American individualism ~New York University, who views it as American identity that is different and reflects the now-famous phrase i n~thing more than the "gentlemanly from the identities of any one of the "politics of ineaning," adopted by the face of nationalism," because "the ~ ethnic groups that comprise the Amer- Clintons (coined by Michael Lerner, very notion of an American identity is 'ican population, that is inclusive of all editor of Tikkun magazine) and set a sweeping siereotype." He warns that ~ of them, and that is available to every- forth in the communitarian philoso- i it is a"Serbian solution to the chal- ! one who is American.... It also helps phy of Amitai Etzioni. In a speech at lenge of living with one another." to realize that all ethnic groups have the University of Texas last year, Hill- But how can the citizenry knowl- ~ 36 Utne Readrr • May/June 1994 tck at j •'~~•~t'I~ .harpcn its distinctions, or, as Ai- `;:nctt ~<<!s, ..lind ways to act toeeth- ethere's Q65014+e17 110 t'?~~I ~ely" r~%1111 ihusc they do not understand that ~ ~~h,~n~ thcy dfsGke when they do un- ~/~/e re hqs~, fhe r.land How can a country's lead- ~caTi_ : r. Counteract the glibness of inean- bi5, ~ 5 5 q4 n(i Us e arr~ beca ~ Se ( f S Vr Ie;~st Hackney and the NEH b~5i n e ~ jtr oR'cring speci fic sugges tions on ~ 0`~ ' ~qr r e- 4 r` Y f-or r"'~ efO 99 1e I ~ti.tt the average citizen can do. It's ~k~n J~ilicult to imagine a more effective new M.i> to raise the level of debate than to ) ~t S> 4 Pnkced wit h a government-led effort - ~ j ;cus- to get citizens conversing in neighbor- o ~ na- houd coffeehouses, taverns, study cir- ily un- Ic>• 5alons, and on-line forums sati~~ns tfiroughout the land. But members of ;ful ttic administration would do well to :ltier pr,«•u ` c.~c what they preach. Seeing the )93). Clintons, Hackney, and other political J Ir;idcrs actualiy engaging in conversa- ns, • ~ays _ ~~~~n» ~vith people in their own neigh- ma( - borhoods would be more meaningful that = than watching them perform at a hun- iseri- _ dred televised town meetings. the _ f~~r~nformation on tl:e Utne Reader ~'~~i hborhood Salon Association n idea, - ~•SA), ca11612/338-5040 or write at fce- _ NSA, clo Urne Recrder, 1624 Hurntun , ' t1 ~ • ~ ng.lt ; is sus- > Pluce, Minneupolis, MN 55403. M ( isious. -Griff Wigley ~ ~ neet- ( enc;y. It - Df truth good, ' • ' ' ~ ;ts. ]3e , csigned a„~ hat happens when one of the world's greatest sopranosYand operane stars disr.inc- meets possibly,dhe_ greatest Amencan songsrwtfi ever? :'Ihe cool fireworks of : , ,v or cassette from Angel Records.~ ' Y - ' ed b :Kiti S111gS PO1~CP=now."ava~lable on CD terstlip." 'ihe silken voice of Dame Kui Te Kanawa ~s a perfect match for iingless- smood~ soptvsacauon ofCole Porter's unforgettable composiuons. Her~`ur suigs a~ empo- - , , . It/j1flZC~ le believe _-suuig of Portees finest, from bnlliant show scores like ICus~,Me Kate, C~n Can, and -Tl1e Gay D~onee Her rend~aon of such Pqzter classia as Nght and Drr~,~,1,0~ u g ~ uchtof Farx~ Tr~reLove and.l'ue tYou UnderM'y Sk~n bruigs iiew ~chness to is too of Song, ;htlessiy Of course, Kiri.;is no newcomer'to'modem'Amencan music.;Her amaiuig rang,e ! on iden- and versatil iry mean that she's at home with every,thing from class~cal arias to l'c tand.~: g, but the u, o* gp Indeed; two recent recoc_ ,.Ksn Ssn s Kern )uble." P P ~ ~ ~ g ~ uader and K~i Sings Gershtiviu, were uemendous ~;m~ For anyone who appreciates m ic with style an , Rirhard savoit: fait~ Kir! Sitigs POt'ter is the tofx i,?c?NS ac Available at better record scores--or cali now cws it as order, mll-free. lemanly ~ • "thie 'X identity is Gall 1800788878574, varns that It only takes a momentto_o~er. , ic chal- ~ i her." i . y kruowl- . May/June 1994 • Utne Reader 37 RECEIVED • j ~ ' ~ j~r ~J ~ Vail AlPine Ga kden ' , Foundation ! :r _ Creek Wildflower •VOLUME 8 Winter • 1994 NuMSER z , VAGF Selects Fonnations Inc. I11 To Work on Gardens Interpretation , Firm Hel in to Plan p g .3 Program for Both a3 Gardens & Visitor Center ' { .1. Ever wonder what all those nice flowering i plants (and others, too!) in Betty Ford Alpine Gardens are all about? What's the difference ~between the three gardens already in place in - f Q Ford Park? Or, perhaps, how do the Gardens - .-o- - J~r relate to the mountains which surround them? Well, Vail Alpine Garden Foundation ~ (VAGF), creator of Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, ~ has selected Formadons Inc., of Portland, i 1 , Craig Kerger, President of Formutions Ine., is working ~ Oregon, to assist with telling the Gardens ~i on the interpretive program to begin going in place this /story to our thousands of visitors: What the coming summer in Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. plants are, why they are there, what they have to tell us about themselves and their place in the scheme of things. F2Sf1Vd1 Of FIOWeIS PI'Ori10teS Formations was selected by VAGF after r Early Summer in;Vail Valley looking at the work of a number of nationally ~ recognized firms which have worked with Unil Valley Festival of Flowers is getting museums in interpreting their collections-not bigger and better. From June 18 to July 10, it / many firms have worked with botanic will draw early season visitors to Vail for tours d ~ gardens, which lag well behind various types of Bettv Ford Alpine Gardens, garden walks of museums and zoos in telling the story of through Vail Village and wildflower hikes in \~i, what they display to the visiting public. the surrounding mountains. Special garden j % The President of Formations, Craig plaques, awarded by the Vail Alpine Garden Kerger, along with others on his staff, has Foundation, will identify outstanding arca made several visits to Vail, and later this gardens. Brochurc/maps promoting the self- c~l~~ summer will be installing the beginnings of guided tours, will be available at Vail the Gardens' interpretive program at Betty information centers during the Festival and C~;-a,~ .'(J`' 4r Ford Gardens in Ford Park. Their work will throughout the summer. atso be seen near the start of the Shrine Ridge The Fcstival will conclude on July 10 with Trail where the Foundation has bu;lt a bridge A ,'viidsiirnrner Night, a champagne benefit to protect a fragile bog through which the foot reception for Betty Ford Alpine Gardens, Please see Formations on page 4 PleASe see Festival o f Floruers on page 4 i Gore Range Ramblings Strangers in Paradise by Marty Jones, Gardens Director Many of us, upon first arriving in Vail, presumed that it was an inhospitable climate for ~ gardening, much less for human existence. I remember my first winter. I was ready to batten down the hatches and endure the season, . waiting eagerly for spring. To my most pleasant surprise, winters 1' Scotch Broom, have been much more miid and enjoyabte Cytisus scoparius: than those in my nadve Nebraska. And This shrub, about three the summers? Well, we all know how r• to four feet tall, produces glorious those are. the most stunning But still, it did not occur to me that display of intensely plants would respond in much the same fragrant flowers of any of way to our climate. I guess I was not yet the tradifional flowering sensitized. Understanding this was one of the inspirinQ factors in the conception of Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. Over the years we have had many wonderful surprises, along with some failures. Ten years ago when the garden was just a gleam in my eye, I never dreamed we would be growing plants from South Africa, Australia, the Mediterranean, South America, Mexico, De(osperma congestum Asia, and Europe. Through my association with Denver discovered many plants that, at first, were not Botanic Gardens and the curator of its Rock considered viable in our elimate by "experts." . Alpine Garden, Panayoti Kelaidis, we have Little did they know of my naivete and determination. I have tried many fascinating . . . . . . VAIL.ALPWE GARDEN FOUNDATION Newsletter new plants in the garden. me succeeded, many did not. But the successes far outweigh ['u6lisHed: quarteily;by Vai1 Alpine Garden FoundaHon, 183 Gore Creck Drive, Vail;.. the disappointment of the failures. Colorado 81657.., The newsletter is a benefit of inembership in Vail Alpine Garden . On2 Of mY fBVOrite UriuSUal pldIltS t}ldt h8S Foundation;: a nonprofir Colorado corporation: The newsletter solicits articles for : ;Pu.: adaPted to life in Vail, is Euryops ac7'eaus. This is lication:about'Plants and'gardeninS that are of interest to its membershiP: For ; b;.. : . , . a lovel dwarf Mediterranean shrub. Its silver fiuther: inforcnation about Vai1 Alpine Garden'Foundation or to submit an'article;Y please wriie to:che addreas above.or call (303) 47&0103: needle-like foliage and nice yellow ray flowers '.ED[7'ORIAL :BOARD. - Sydney.Summers (Edifor) , Helen Fritch, Deane Hall make it a wonderful choice for a rock garden. Also, it is quite high in "gloat factor." This is a , BOARD:`OF DIRECTORS . plant that a dear friend and intemationally HONORARY:DIRECTOR . Betty Ford respected rock gardener told me was "not for ' OFFICERS. Helen S. Fritch, President . Vail." Two years later, on a subsequent visit to Katherine S. Borgen, Vice President the garden, he was chagrined to find that we Lynda Coldstein, Vice President had produced a healthy specimen from a slyly- Andrew Pierce Secreta ry sneaked cutting. The plant is sdll doing well. Robert Kenney, Treasurer Another favorite is Raoulia australis one of DIRECTORS the many Australian "Vegetable Sheep:" -'This ` plant gets its name because of the way very old Jeanne Bailey Kathryn Haber Fern Portnoy Maureen Shapiro lants of this enus look from a distance-like Barbara DeVoe Deane Hall Peter Rudy James Stephcn,son P g Adele Douglas Ellen Watcrman sheep dotting the hillsides of their nadve ALPINE GAIZDENS DIRECTOR Marty Jones habitat. In our garden thcy appear as flat, one- quartcr inch high silver mats with a rubbery 2 4 feel. They produce many tiny yellow flowers P1d11 NOW fOr PIdI1f 5dle ' just above the foliage. Many of our visitors think they are a moss, or lichen. One visitor On Saturday, june 4 even thought it was spilled paint! It is a The Alpine Garden plant sale is a Vail wonderful addition to the garden, as well as a tradition. Now in its ninth year, the event will conversation piece. Be the first one on your be held on June 4 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. in the „Can we intrigue you block to raise "Vegetable Sheep." Safeway parking lot. with beebalm, Another gem is Delosperma congestum, Adele Douglas, Plant Sale Chair, has monkshood, batchelor commonly known as Hardy Ice Plant. This announced some new features: Garden buttons, dusty Miller, plant comes to us from South Africa, via Denver members will receive a 10% discount; non- sweet William? Botanic Gardens. This little succulent, which is members may join and receive the discount as Or are you looking for ~ often mistaken far a Sedum, is probably the well as other benefits.of becoming a Garden a nezv plant intro- showiest of the group. The lime green foliage.is member. duCtion Dianthus covered with large, brilliant chrome-yellow Lots of annuals, perennials, and hanging flowers in early summer. As fall comes, the baskets will be deltoides .dark eye,, foliage turns red and remains so until well into on display, as always, but Adele a r~pberry~lower the following spring' When the weather reall P~ans to extend the range of plant material at with dark eyes?" Y this year's sale, introducing new plants that are starts to get warm, the succulent turns back to not commonly seen in Vail. its wonderful lime green. ne last plant, a jewel indeed, is the Scotch Broom, Cytisus scoparius. This shrub, about <v, . three to four feet tall, produces the most stunning display of intensely fragrant flowers of any of the traditional flowering shrubs. The colors range from shades of pale yellow to gold, red and pink. The latter colors have not been 7 i adequately testcd at this time, but the yellow J,.~'~ . J and old forms have a lon successful track reco d in Vail. g Every year when they am in bloom, at least half a dozen ardeners come to me with a twi g g bearing these wonderful yellow flowers, + - ~ • „ ud: desperately wanting to know what this marvelous plant is. It is truly one of the most under-used and under-appreciated woody Lots of plants available at the snle. ornamentals available to us, perhaps for two She is making a huge effort to bring to the reasons: A relaHve of this shrub is terribly Vail Valley plants of Colorado culture that will aggressive. (If you have ever been around enhance our specific environment. We live in a Portland, Oregon in the spring you'll find it "divided" valley. The beautiful Gore growing everywhere.) Also, most nursery Creek/Eagle River is both a visual and a catalogs classify it as Zone 5 or 6. I assure you, horticultural divider. The semi-arid south- it is probabiy a Zone 4 or maybe a 3. facing slopes of juniper and sage brush are the "How ubout a bog As for plants we've tried and lost, like lost antithesis of the wetter north-facing ski slopes birch, Betula loves, it is best to not dwell on the past. with thcir huge Douglas firs, aspen groves, and However, we do have records of them upon flowing creeks. Plants suitable for the south grandulosa, request. slopes are not those adaptable to the north face propogated from These am only the highlights. We hope in without soil amendment, irrigation, and cuttings of one on years to come that we will introduce many more considerable adapability on the part of the Vail PaSS? Being a plants to Vail and that our friends at Denver plants. 1lative it Sllould do Botanic Gardens will continue to support our Please come to the plant sale. Bring your well where if can et testing efforts. Without them, chances are that questions, a description of your growing 8 we wouldn't have many of the wonderful, conditions, and we will make educated good moisture." unusual plants that we currently cultivate in evaluations in recommending plants for you Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. from thosc availablc at the sale. I hope you will try some experiments of Look for thc tcnt just off thc frontage road your own. If you have luck with something in front of Safcway, and experiment with some . different or unusual, let me know so we can ncw plants for your garden while you support share it with the community and our visitors. thc Bctty Ford Gardcns. 3 ~ Festival of Flowers from page 1 Formations fsom page 1 honoring the. best gardens in the Vail Valley. path passes near Shrine Mountain Inn. The reception will be followed by a Bravo! Formations has worked on numerous U.S. Colorado concert featuring the Colorado Park Service, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Springs Symphony performance of Beethoven's Service, and Army Corps of Engineers Ninth Symphony, conducted by Christopher interpretive projects since Craig Kerger, Wilkins. together with his buiness partner Sandy Kerger, Va11 Valley That is the public, marketing side of the began the company in 1989 after having worked Fesrival. The other side is helping gardeners to for others in the interpretive field for a number Festival improve their gardens. of years. of Flowers Whether or not you feel yours is a mature, While FormaHons has not worked with a elig-ible garden, we encourage you to enter your botanic garden before, the company is no June 18 to July. 10 garden in the Festival. It offers other benefits stranger to telling the story of the natural world. tours of Betty Ford besides awards. Our plant professionals come One of the firm's most interesting current Alpine Gardens, to your home or business to evaluate your projects is the Pacific Northwest Museum of garden walks garden and offer suggestions. These "garden Natural History which will open in Ashland, through Uail Village, gurus," with their advice and expert feedback, Oregon this coming July. Formations has done and wildflower hikes can help you to turn your garden into a future both the design and the fabrication work on all in the surrounding award-winning entry. of the new museum's displays interpreting the mountains We define "gardens" to include flower bio-climatic zones of the Pacific Northwest. displays both large and small, planters, and Funding for the museum is from private sources hanging baskets, as well as full size gardens. plus from the various Federal agencies which Garden evaluations will take place the week have stewardship of lands in the Pacific following the Fourth of July and include the Northwest-a particularly interesHng Federal- Vail gardcns awarded plaques in mid-June. private collaboration. Trophies for the bcst "gardens" in thc Vail Formations is also completing the design : Vailey will be awarded in four categories: and fabrication of a permanent exhibit for the residential, hotels/commercial buildings, Weyerhaeuser Corporation on the eruption of condominium associations, and Mount St. Helens and regional wildlife, forestry shops/offices/restaurants. practices and conservation. If you would like to have your garden Of the Vail project, Craig Kerger said, "We included in this event, please call the are eager to work with Vail Alpine Garden Foundation officc (476-0103). Foundation to dcvclop an intcrprctive approach and a set of exhibits that will sct new standards of excellence and cmativity for botanical Memorials & Tribzctes gardenseverywhem," and VAGFbclicves they can do it in Bctty Ford Alpine Gardens. In memory of Mrs. John A. Dobson [3ill WiJto The C Philip Smilcy Family Oran & Paula Palmatccr ~ Marvd Barnes Karen K. Cilbcrt ~ Marge_Burdick I'atrida Rickman Seeking Sponsors for' ~ Joan Whittenbcr Jim & Virginia Millsap ~ Vail Alpine Garden Foundation Qoard Barbara [iurton Vail Valley FesEival of Flowers ~ In memory of Kay Fuchs Roger & Margaret Reisher Margie & Mark MucUcr Vail Associates Rcal Fstate, A Midsummer Night ' Bcavcr Crcek Winter Interlude In memory of Trilby Porino Mrs. Polly Jcffries Bill & Adele Douglas Ceorgc Webstcr In memory of Viola Olson Luanne M. Smith The Foundation is seeking The C. Philip Smiley Family Barbara & Famonn Quigley sponsors for Vail Valley Festival of In memory of Derek f3runner Stephanie Ward Quigley Flowers A Midsummer Night and Robert OGver Marvel Barnes ~ [3ob & Debbie Warner Winter Interlude. Events are a good In memory of Elizabeth Alcxandra Marge Burdick Burks Peter va,,ra way for businesses to advertise their Mary Jo & Richard Froberg Gizella Schoren support of Betty Ford Alpine William H. Todd Claus Fricke In memory of Ella Andcrson xi?ma Dommer Gardens and our environmental Doris Bailcy Denise Hill eEforts. Call Helen Fritch at the Shirley Ward Foundation office (476-0103) for Lt. Scott Ward In honor of Phil & Janc Smilcy Pvt. Richard Ward Richard & Charleen Krumbiegel further information. Stacey Ward 4 ~ ~ Vail Alpine Garden Foundation 1994 Calendar o f Events MAY WhaYs in bloom in May? Early: Crocus, draba, iris reticulata, primula Later: Daffodils, tulips, a varie.ty of alpines 1 Betty Ford Alpine Gardens open for the season. ~ 6-7 ' Denver Botanic Gardens Plant Sale. This is a wonderful plant sale and a good time for mountain gardeners to plant perennials. Join a carpool on May 6 to visit Denver Botanic Gardens • ` and find some unusual plants for your garden. r~ 9 First Workday in the Gardens. Volunteer gardeners work on Mondays and Thursdays throughout the summer from 9:00 to 12:00. New gardeners, please come for a garden orientation on May 16. Garden and schoolhouse tours, demonstrarions, and 13 Spring Luncheon. 12 Noon at the home of Mary Jo advice from "Dr. Green" will begin in mid-June Froberg, 0221 June Creek Road, Singletree. on Saturday mornings from 10 to 12. Check Garden members, volunteers and newcomers to newspaper calendars for scheduled topics. the community are welcome to hear about Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and new summer programs. 4 Vail Alpine Garden Plant Sale. 9-3, Safeway parking lot. Annuals, perennials, hanging baskets, 16 Orientation for New Garden Volunteers.l0 a.m. planters, and more. Experiment with new plants Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. Beginning and for your garden and benefit Betty Ford Alpine experienced gardeners are welcome. Gardens. 17 "Garden Questions and Answers." 7-9. Vail Public 4 Orientation for pocents. 2 p.m. Betty Ford Alpine Library Community Room. Experienced and Gardens. Leam more about the flowers and professional gardeners answer your questions history of Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and the about planning and planting. historic schoolhouse. We welcome your enthusiasm as a greeter and guide and will 21 Town of Vail Clean Up Day. Join Vail's spring clean provide materials and training. up and benefit Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. It's a morning of worthwhile fun, followed by a Town 6 Spring Garden Workshop. 10 a.m. Betty Ford picnic... and the Town makes a donation to the Alpine Gardens. Gardens for each volunteer we provide. Call the VAGF office (476-0103) to put your name on our 18 Spring Potluck Dinner. 6:30 p.m. at the golf course list. home of Mary and Ralph Davis,1170 Ptar•migan Road, Vail. Gardeners are also wonderful cooks! 28 Bob Fest Breakfast. A pancake breakfast prepared Invitations will be mailed to local members in by some of our volunteers from 8 to 11 a.m. to early June. Call the VAGF office (476-0103) in introduce the world's Bobs to flowers and Betty mid-June if you do not receive an invitation. Ford's Gardens. Near the Bob Bridge in Avon. 18 Vail Ualley Festival of Flowers. A celebration of JLJNE gardens and flower displays in the Vail Valley. The Festival will include a F7ower Walk through What's in Bloom in June? . Vail Village and Lionshead and wildflower hikes Early: Tulip, columbine in the Vail area. Special plaques will be awarded Later: Lupine, oriental poppy, veronica, to outstanding gardens. The Festival will dwarf iris conclude wi th A Midsummer Night on July 10. i i JULY TBA Art Auction. Presented by the Vail Valley Gallery ~ AssociaHon and Betty Ford Alpine Gardens for WhaYs in bloom in July? the benefit of both nonprofit organizations. Early: Tall bearded iris, hardy geranium Invitations will be mailed in late July. Later: Shasta daisy, Siberian iris, day lily SEPTEMBER Garden and schoolhouse tours, demonstrations, and advice from "Dr. Green" continue on Saturday What's in Bloom in September? momings from 10 to 12. Check newspaper Autumn crocus, colchicum, a variety of late calendars for current schedule and topics for bloomers that hold into fall weekly programs. Garden and schoolhouse tours, demonstradons, and Wildflower Walks & Picnics. July is peak time to advice from "Dr. Green" will continue on some take wildflower walks on Shrine Ridge, Loveland' Saturday mornings from 10 to 12. Later Pass, Vail Mountain, or the many hiking trails in September programs will depend on the weather. the area. Pick up a Festival of Flowers Check newspaper calendars for weekly topics or brochure/map for suggested hikes and directions. call the VAGF office at (476-0103) for more informadon. 6-7 Vail Valley Festival of Flowers. Search for "the best gardens of the Vail Valiey." Garden judges will 3 Adopt-a-Plant Day. Give a plant from Betty Ford's visit residenHal gardens from East Vail to Lake Gardens a home in your garden. Garden Cmek. Call the VAGF office (476-0103) to enter volunteers will give away some of the many your garden. You will receive specific comments plants (also called "volunteers") that spring up in _ about design, plant selecHon, and maintenance of the garden over the summer. your garden to help in futum planning. 12 Fall Garden Workshop. 10:00 a.m. Betty Ford Alpine 10 A Midsummer Night. A champagne recepHon to Gardens. benefit Betty Ford Alpine Garderis and honoring the winners of Uail Valley Festival of Flowers. The OCTOBER garden party will be followed by a Bravo! Colorado performance of Beethoven's Ninth 3& 10 Garden Clean up Days. Join the garden crew and Symphony by the Colorado Springs Symphony. help put the Gardens to bed for the winter. Champagne reception from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. in the Gardens before the concert at 6:00. 29 Annual Meeting & Fall Potluck Dinner. Invitations will be mailed to local members in October. 30 Dedication of the Shrine Ridge Bridge. Tentative date. 11:00 a.m. near Shrine Mountain Inn. DECEMBER - Celebrate the preservation of this interesting , marsh area and learn about the alpine plants that 27 Winter Inferlude. Holiday concert and buffet to grow here and on Shrine Ridge. Bring the whole benefit Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. 5 to 8 p.m., family, your friends, and a picnic lunch for a Concert at 6:00 by the Chamber Orchestra of the memorable day in the mountains. Colorado Springs Symphony. Radisson Resort in Lionshead. InvitaHons will be mailed in AUGUST November. What's in Bloom in August? NA Early: Delphinium, tall phlox, Japanese iris, rose Later: AsiaHc lily, Asiatic gentian Garden and schoolhouse tours, demonstrations, and For More In f ormation advice from "Dr. Green" continue on Saturday momings from 10 to 12. Check newspaper about any of the events listed or for tickets to calendars for current schedule and topics for events, please call the Vail Alpine Garden weekly programs. Foundation office at (303) 476-0103. Wildflower Walks & Picnics. August features the ]f you are not a local resident and a member of the Alpine later summer wildflowers, although the weather Garden Foundafion but would like to be included on the is still iilviting. ' invitafion list for local events, please let us know. • Spring Luncheon to from ten unHl noon and to groups by volunteer workday. She stopped to ~ appointment. This year they will visit with some of the volunteers, Launch Summer include the historic schoolhouse on when one asked, "Do you have a few their tours. minutes?" Elien spent the next Volunteer Season We also will offer a series of mini- several hours on her hands and knees Members, newcomers to the Workshops on Saturday mornings. weeding and has been interested and valley, volunteers and potential Suggested topics include propagation, involved in the Betty Ford Gardens volunteers will welcome spring and building alpine troughs, flower ever since. learn about new volunteer photography, and hordcultural A Denver resident, Ellen was a opportunities at the annual Spring demonstraHons. We are looking for member of the Denver Botanic Luncheon on Friday, May 13. The talented volunteers with garden- Gardens Board for twelve years and luncheon will be held at the home of related subjects to share. Watch and was chair of their Education Mary Jo Froberg in Singletree. Call newspaper calendars during the. Committee. Although she left the her at 926-3220 to let her know you summer to see what is on the board hoping to devote some leisure are coming and whether you can schedule. time to educational projects, she bring something to share. We have been offered land to start couldn't resist the young, thriving The luncheon is a wonderful a community garden in the mid- botanic garde.n in Vail and the opportunity to greet other garden valley "banana belt." It can be an encouragement of her friends to members after the long winter. And exciHng community effort for people parHcipate. Ellen will focus on you will enjoy seeing the perennials h'ithout space to build gardens of education plans for our Gardens as and succulents in Mary Jo's lovely their own if we have volunteers well. rock garden. willing to coordinate the project. In Denver she is faculty About new volunteer coordinator with Jones Education opportunities: This summer we will Ellen Waterman Network, which offers their programs expand the docent program started through cable television. She is last year by Ken Slump. Docents are joins Garden Board currently developing a master's our hosts and hostesses who give Last year Ellen Waterman was program for-Jones. We welcome Ellen garden tours on Saturday mornings visiting the Betty Ford Gardens on a to our Board. Non-Profit [~llll . U.S. Postage ~ PAID il~ 7 ;.~v~ Petmit No. 31 GciYC~C'11111 E' Vail, Colorado r F0II1447f1011 183 Gorc Creek Drive %'aii, Colorado 81637 TOWN OF VaIL TOWN MANAGER' S CiFf= ICE 75 S. FRONTAGC RD. VAIL CO 81657 See You at the EXP,4NL:30E1D VAGF Annual Plant Sale, 4 Safewa Pa ~ June , y rking Lot n i; • iA,t.~u-t%~-- . The Vail Recreation District and •~<~~u~ , The Vail Business & Professional Women present - A WORLD FIT.TO LIVE IN. AI V1/a I ker, CS P former President of the National Speqkers Association Thursda Ma ~26..1994,' , noon - 1 pm - Luncheon presentation at Seasons at the Green Restaurant In order to create a world worth living in, one must first have a self worth living with. AI presents a business perspective on how successful people develop and use habits such as clearly defined goals, commitment, enthusi- asm and effective eommunications. Topics include: • Vlohat it takes to have self worth living with • Three areas of growth: Knowledge, Skill and Attitude = 'rersonai vaiues: Whut ao you tieiieve in? in inrnaT areas wiil you not compromise? • Creating the "Owner" att;tude • Tying it all together $20 fee includes lunch and presentation A portion of the proceeds to benefit the Resovrce Center • Please RSVP to the Vail Recreation District at 479-2279 or mail in registration form with payment. ~ ? Yes! I am interested in the AI Walker presentption. Please reserve spaces for our group. , ? No,.I am not interetsed. Please keep me posted on other business seminars in the Vai) Valley. Name: ' ' - Address: Cityf Stote/Zip: Organization: _ I have enclosed $ Please return registration form with payment to: ' Vail Recreation Distrid 292 W. Meadow Drive Vail, .:oloraC..) 81657 %61 Z 6 AdW 0311t3038 0-2 3 a/ , . L5s Ls 00`1!,Sn pBOa aft-;uoj=1 'S 51 joAeW Ipn lo unnol . . ~ ssoPa;sp A66ad tj~+.oly_ c.. = L99 L8 OD '.I1D,^ „ 9nia4 rnopoaW •M L67, u01104u9saad a9110M IW ~ . . - pu}si4 uoi1oajoa~ ~ion . AL VNALKERpresents . , : _ . ; - , . . . 4 . O . . RLD FITI .~ECEIVED ~MAY.1 3 199~ c . _ ~ - - - CoLO~ro~ Y - • ~ AT ' ' y ? ~ . _ . , , •x . , . . T~ J87 ~ WATCH ~ i~. ~ •i' I Coloraalo Legislanve Council ~ ~ . • . ' ~ j .:I'. ~ . . , . . t ' 994 AP. Vol. . . . . . , O M N I B U S C R I M E~ B I L L. M O V E S. T O: The House version' contains no new, mandatory, minimum . . . . ~ - , CONFERENCE: 5TATE MANDATES. MODIFIED sentence"s;;;except..Tfor a. version of. the "three: strikes" rovision that is~narrowe'r' than the Senate's: 'Ttie House The U.S_ House of Representatives has wrapped up -;bill"'also authorizes considerably moce money for"pure ; wock.on an omnibus, crime proposal;; HR 3355 (formerly . prevenUon.pkrograms, including new direct grants to nee~y 'HR 4092),~as a:response to,the:Senate-sponsored package ; communrtiessand special~ fund'uig foi.up to 15~ high-crime~~; • passed last November. As reported in ttie F.ebnia`ry/March areas,that would be~designaed as, model prevention zones ~ F _ ,'r y x ..r , ~ . . . . Mandafe Watch, the Senate, bill:.containefl: numerous. mandates and preemptions that would.affect state and.locai ~ Issues related to 4the scope: of the, two proposals are governments and whicti:. are potentialty very, costly. expected tojbe addressed~in conference committees in early House proposal would modify some of these requirements May.'~ For _ example;' ;the Senate, proposal contemplates-:~ : and retain others in an attempt~to 'win 'support for an authorizing,$8'.9.billion over'five years to help stafes and';~: ~ emerging federal role in the anti-crime arena. The House localities hiie;.a6out 100,.0OO.-new .police..officers; the bill would allocate $3.5 billion to hire 50,000 new police House version.authorizes. $3.5 ,billion~ in hiring grants'for _ officers, $13.5 bill ion to help states build more prisons and about 50,000 ne~v officers. Of critical imp.ortance to 'states ~ boot camps, and would create a~variety of,community w,ill be the oufcome..of.deliate~over mandatory sentencing: crime prevention programs.~ The total spending authorized provisions, which could cost states up, to $.12 billion under ~ by the House bill is nearly $28 billion as contrasted by the the Senate version of the legislation. Senate's plan to authorize $22:3 billion.,- . . - . ~ - - . . . . ~ ~ ; . . : Key differences in the House version/~may peovide - "FIDERAI. MANDATE ACT!' CLEARS COLORADO more tlexibility and ' fewer . mandates to states and SENATE ; ~ localities. A prime exa~mple is that the House calls for a$13.5 billion grant program for- state Q~rison The State Senate has given final approval to S.B. 94- construction without specific sentencing mandafes, and 157, Concernine the Implementation * of Federal ~ an additional $600 million for state boot camps and Mandates. Sponsored ' by Senator Tom Norton and other programs for youthful offenders. However, states Representative Chuck Berry, the new legislation lias been with stringent sentencing laws would be eligible for amended to cover a wider range of federal requirements, extra funds. The Senate bill has earmarked $3 billion to including mandates in such areas as environmental ~ build at least 10 federal regional prisons, but to access this protection, social services, education, -and-transportation: program, states would have to adopt so-called "truth in As amended,_the bill performs tttree major functions. sentencing" guidelines that require violent felons to serve • SB 94-157:requires state departments and:agencies to- at least 85 per cent of their sentences. .In addition, the follow ceRain guidelines in the development of state.,-. Senate bill contains numerous. new mandatoryminimum programs :wtiich respond to maridates ' in ~federal~` ~ sentences, including a"three strikes and you're out". statutes. The bill requires state officials to implement ~ provision that would mandate life imprisonment for three= ~ such programs witli a discerning view towaazd any time viotent offenders. Colorado Mandate Watch is a publfcation of the Colorado Legislative Council, the research'arm of the Colorado General Assembly. - Sources of information for this publication include the National Conference of State Legislature "s Hall of the States Mandate Monitor. 1 . teaerai. reguianons, guiaelmes, or poticies itiac are Inconsistent unnecessary_ burdens to - the State; legal theoeies with.Colorado state poticy or wluch do not advanCe}Rstate. : tosupport states' rights in implementing federal mandates; ,policy in acost-effective manner. and_recommendations for legislation.to ensure a state's - - . • - : authority; to _ implement federal mandates in a manner , • The ,TointBudget Committee (JBC) is directed to . consistent with.`state policy. The review would include determine whether a state 'program mandated by=, information on possible funding sources _for compliance federal scatute is necessary to protect the public health,• with federal mandates. " - - . . safetyq• and welfare. During preparation of the annual":. state budget, the. JBC is authorized to decide whether The significance . of S.Z. 94157 ' is 'that it will such programs are cost-effective or whether the;: : provide - a formal mechanism for the 1eg.islature to ~ program. can be better provided through a state-run determine whether compliance with federal mandates is program more closely based on state policy. = consistent with state policy, is cost-effecteve, and is necessady for protection of ..the public._ . In addition, a ~ The Executive Committee of the Legislative Council :'bofly of information_will be created ttiat. will. prt}vide the would oversee the implementation of the act,.includirig ~ state with strategic dafa on federal mandates. Compliarice a review of f'ederal mandates to be conducted by the ~ with federal mandates will be more strietly scrutinized by Legislative Council and the Office of Legislative Legal the Joint Budget _Committee, the Executiye Committee of Services. These agencies would issue a request for the Legislative,Counc'il; and. ultimately by the full*,General information to identify: those mandates that are Assembly during annual budget deliberations f- : : . , , . . . . 2.. : . - d. , v 'n , . . . . . , - . . • ~"p i.:::.:r'. "i:::: :::::::::'::::::::::::''ii::i:::::tiC:i::i:::::•':ii::::~.•:i:•::::.i:::i!:. J~ . . },'y \ ::.:::.....~:p:l.j::.:.:.:.:.:::.~n::?:.i.:.:.::.:::.i'`:~1j.::::i':i:Ji':>::::::::::ii:::::i:•i:`v•:iLi:::':':::j:ii>:~:::{:,':i'~.;i:::i:.:i'i'ri?S.`j:::i'r`:::::":i:i:::::::'r:':?:i`i'::::`::'i::'::::: "'...n. ' . i'•: : ' i : : : ' i: : i::: : i j:: i::::: : i:.: : : y'. . ..M.\........~t....:~~~!M!......~...'.Y..::.~::::v.........:..........................:i::::..:::::?:..:::::.::.:.:.:.::.................- {Pending i,a Congress, a regular feature of thrs. newslener., ~national- 6enefits package_ States ' wouldlhave to submit summariZes ederal mandate le ~.slation b ro ram area. ` ,f g~ y P 8 )plans to the National Health Board and, would become the ' primary admmistrative umt for the' national health care MUNY MANDATES PENDING BEFORE =103RD j : - P az? CONGRESS ADpOURNS 5) Immigrahon Stabilization Act (HIt 3320) The A large number of bills containing mandates to state billwould require states~or-local governments to,verify ttie . and local governments await action before the 103rd immigration status of. aliens apply.ing for AFDC, . Congress adjourns later tliis year. : The National ` M~icaid, unemployment compensation, food stamps, or Conference of State Legislatures is currently tracking 122 certain housing prograrns. States.not in compliance.could ~ bilis with potential mandates to the states:_ This issue of lose federal°'assistan& for these programs:` _ the Colorado Mandate Watch monitors 63 measures ` . . which may have impact on - government operations in 6) Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Chiidrn Act Colorado and its localities, and lists an additional 7. (S 1069, HR: 324) The' bill requires states to enter mandates which have already been signed into law: Listed information in the state law enforcement system and the below are capsule summaries of the 9 major mandates , National Crime Information Center computer networks on which this publication will track during the next several persons convicted of a criminal offense against a ininor. months, based on the magnitude of impact, fiscal States not in compliance may receive a reduction of federal implications, and likelihood of passage. law.enforcement assistance funds. - 1) The Violent. Crime Control and Law "n Comprehensive Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement Act of 1993 (HR 3355). Omnibus crime R e f o r m A c t ( H R 1280, S 5 75) T h e b i l l. e x p a n d s.. O S H A bill (see Mandate Alert, this issue): " - covera ge ,to state and local government em plo yees (see Local Frorrt, this. issue): . 1 2) Federal VVater Pollution Control Act (S 1114) and 3) Reauthorization of Safe Drinking Water Act (S , g) EpA Rule-Making Authority (confained in HR ; 1547). (see Focus Feature, this issue). 3245). The bill contains requirements that the EPA refrain-; from issuing any new regulations that do not contain a 4) President Clinton's Health 5ecurity Act (S 1757, . risk-benefit analysis. HR 3600) The president's health caze proposal, like other moderate proposals offered by Senator Chaffee and 9) Elementary and Secondary Education Act Representative Cooper, contains reyuirements that states (ESEA) Amendments (HR 6) Amendments to the Act have the primary responsibility for ensuring that everyone inciude requirements that schools expel for one year any' " within a state has access to health plans providing the Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building 0 Denver, Colorado 80203-1784 0 303/866-3521 0 Page 2 . 7 ~ r. . • £ . _ . . . . ' . . . ' . . , . . , ` student bringing a giin to'`schoo~.or~ risk loss; of federal - J=requiiements which may make federal funds for education ~;ESEA funding. Ttie bill . also. contains,'provisions to conditional onadoption of standazds included in the_ Goals eliminate funding for bilingual eiiucation that.woutd shift: 2000tegislation (P.L,. 103-227). these costs to states and locaGties. . Also, :there~; are 'new 4 r. ' . . . . , -a..s; , . .'J . . . ' " 'tc..,,. `'..F:i~'i::':~;::::i:;:;;:;:::::i;:.`:::::i:2i;;r;;i:.;;;.ti':;;:::<i!:'>::::::i::i::`:;::::;::::;.:::~i::::;:,::::::>:>:::''~:2:::;:'::::i::;:;:::::;:;::;i:i;`.:::::' . :'::.`;:;i;>::::i::::+•+::'::•::.:::.>'•::'•.:::;:..:'.>:;.:;>:>;:i:::>;::::;:::~:a>:.>:;:»>:. . . .:.::.::.b::;:;:i:i::::::::;:;::;:::::::::::::::::::::~~:..... (Focus identifies and analyies a subject area'of mandate.. Contanunaiets. The bill'eases. certain health standards activiry or an individual mandate of concern 'to Colorado.- for drinkirig water"supplies.' It raises to 1 in 1 million the 7yeis.month's focus feature.~was ~ contributed by Rochelle maximum allowed risk of acquiring cancer through human : Archuleta and Ken Cole of I;egislative Council Staff.) ~*exposure ;to contaminants It.- eliminates the current . . . . . . requirement `that the EPA: regulate at least 25 additional . This month's Focus Feature discusses5 the -major_ water contaminants'every .three :years._ : S: 1547. also: components of two. pieces ' of pending federal requires tlie EPA';io` identify 'and limit containinants that.'.. environmental legislation that aze likely to be acted upon _ pose the greatest health.;risk.-to humans: The bill provides _in the coming months:.., Both the reauthorization of the ' that a' 1 ist. of the ~15 ,coritaminants that 'pose the greatest Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act:wilI -liealth risk~be pubiished%witliin~'th`ree,•years-of~enacfinent: have substantiai implication,s for Colorado state and'local These changes are;designed to reduce r.egulatory'red tape, goents. ro focus the EPA on removiitg tlie rvorst'contaminants " - ' - - : ' t~ . .ra t.E.,~s , 2 .s"'~'.~k i~ 'i,i: ° - . . ; , . . , _ . - , } „r:n,' ~ i.: .1, a .w~ ~ t x. t . , • SAFE DRINKING ,WATER ACT . SmaU-~Water; ` Systems: €The SDWA temporarily waives : requirements for .water systems:that serve 10;000 or fewei . A. bilt claiming to make it easier and cheaper for crties.; people and,:which caniiot afford :to comply with current to provide safe drinking,water cleared a'm .ajor hurdle in 'drinking: water rulations and canriot purchase ttie best : March when it received unanimous approval from the . available technology`.: • This provision covers entities. ihat Senate Environment and Public Works.Committee: The supply water to, trailei'parkssubdivisions,~ and. :rurat" :bill,-S,,1,547, would.reauthorize.the.federal _Safe Drinking towns: The legislation stiil. requires small-water systems <Water Act (SDWA). Included in the proposed overhaul of 'to install'a water punfier, or-an affordable_ alternative tliat the 1974 law, PL 93-423, are the following provisions. provides adequate:watiec~quality and' health protection.• It . is estimaled 'that 87 percent of the nation's drinking water.. :.~Funding Issues. - The bill creates a seven-year; $6.6 'systems are:small;+serve 9'n' ly10 percent o,f, the population, billion revo[ving loan fund for locatities to construct and and bear about 40 percent~of the .SDWA's costs. - repair outdated drinking water system ; projects . . . - . . ~ - ($600,0001000 in FY 1994 and $1 billion per yeaz from Monitoring. The bill 'provides enforcement authorities FY 1995 through. FY 2000). ' Funds are distributed for non-compliance ~ including- monetary'. fines and -=according -to the current formula for federal grants to states, but beginning in FY 1998, funds would be administrative actions. - In addition, it reduces the distributed based on an EPA survey of drinking water monitoring of contaminants that have been identified in needs. The tiill allows funds to be used by local water drinking water but that are not currently regulated by law, systems to test water supplies, to find alternative sources The EPA 'is required to review the'monitoring schedule for of water, and to restructure financial operations. The bill. 12 contamiriants and determine whether continued tracking also enables governors. to transfer up. to 50 percent of a is necessary. " . state's Clean Water Act revolving loan fund balance to the • . ' new drinking water fund, and. vice versa; in order to rovide states with added flexibili Although. 5;1547 is heavily focused. on small water.: p ty in targeting urgent systems and 'was amended" to. include cost. assessment needs. Current law authorizes grants only, not a revolving ° loan fund. - . - . • - language, `a coalition of local, city, and state officials.haye. sharply criticized the bill's treatment of major issues sucfi Cost Assessment. The SDWA :requires the EPA to as standards setting, contaminanf selection; and flexibiliry examine both the health risks and-.the economic costs of in monitoring. Some members "of the Senate support an.. reducing those risks when it develops standazds to limit alternative SDWA bill,. 5.1920, sponsored by Senators ~.;.:cancer-causing agents in drinking water, Domeriici (R-N11) and Boren - (D-OK).,.. Congressiorial sfaffers anticipate that the bill, to be considered by the full - Currently the EPA is not reguired to consider economic Senate in late April, is due for . a~."huge battle on the costs to water systems when it establishes health standards. floor." ~ . Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building 0 Denver, Colorado 80203-1784 '0 30'3/866=3521 • Page 3 . CLEAN WATEIt ACT . . _ , . . . . . . . ' J' On February 25, .1994, the Senate Enviroiiment and'~ ' al'so 'authorized to review and amend the assessment. It Public Works Committee :voted to approve S.1114;:requires sfates, within,. two and a half years of reauthorizing the Clean Water Act. The bill; sponsored by'. enactmenf and every five years thereafter,.to submit to Senator Ntax Baucus.(D-MT)-and Senator John Chafee (R-:,:" EPA . for approval a` management program for RI), would continue federal funding for state revolving controlling NPS poliution and improving water quality. loan funds to assist local communities in updating and building sewage. treatment plants. . 5.1114 also -includes S. .1-114 permits states to use alternative management. provisions addressing nonpoint source pollution, wetlands;' measuces to control: NPS,, pollution if the alternative watershed planning, and ~municipal. and toxic pollution measures are, , as, effective,` as EPA• guidelines.. It prevention and control. . : . ; appropriates $300 million in ;'fiscal yeaz 1995 and $500 annually._ in fiscal', years 1996 through 1998 for - Action on fhe bill by the ;full Senate is expecfed in approved state NPS programs. June; however, concerns over the bill's funding ' ` i pcovisions, water rights, private property rights; . and' The bill allows states to designate watershed areas and unfunded mandates could slow Senate action: . While. the' develop plans `to: identify;, improye,. and protect ttie water bill's sponsors` argue 1114% makes it easier and` quality- viiithm des~gnated: watersheds:;~; ; It requires :that F.cheaper for states to comply .with the act, a coalition of j:water and sediment qualitystandards.are attained-within:l0 . state and. local government., leaders : feel . that certain.". years of tlie date of EPA approval _ of the ~plan;If only ::rov'isions in the bill continue to im ose unfunded~~ P p point sources exist within the watershed, then water.guality mandates on state and local governments.. - In addition,',: ::standards must be.met :withm five years of plan approval.congressional advocates of- .privafe property`': : rights'~ This bill' also sets` aside five percerit,of state revolving` loan protection are seekirig to amend federal: laws such as the tund allocations:for watershed planning iri fscal year 1995 ; Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act to enhance . -and mcreases the set aside to. 25 percent inti fiscal year the protection of private property interests. Included:in the . 2000 - . - proposed overhaul of the act are the following provisions. : Water. Qualuy Standards S 1:114 requires states, Funding Issues. Authon*zes $2.5 billion annually : within two years of enactment; to designate`and implement through the year 2000 to continue capitalization grants - a program to protect, "outstanding natural,resource waters'.-for state revolvirng loan funds; however,. c es in the "hang (ONRW) within, the .state.' ONRW include all waters formuta for allocating grant monies to states could within: national:parks:~ Sfates are also required to.provide result in a24 percent reduction in Colorado's allocation for citizen.petitions for ONWR designation:, formula. The new formula, to be phased in over four . years, provides money to each state based in part on a The legislafiori addsa provision requiring states. to 1992 EPA survey of cities most in need of new sewage develop, submit to EPA for -approval, and implement a- treatment facilities. As of December 31, 1993, the statewide antidegradation policy and implementation Colorado revolving loan fund has received $72.1 million proceiiures. The policy must ensure that all. nonpoint in federal capitalization grants and $10 million in state sources are subject to enforceable best management matching funds; however, 66 wastewater projects totaliing practices " before allow.ing a reriuction in the degree of . $338 million remain on the loan, fund's eligibility list: water quality. The bill requires states, within one year of. Municipal Water Pollution Control. The'bill gives „ enactment, to cotlect permit 'fe6.s from point source. states greater flexibiliry to control sewage overflows from' dischargers. The total amount of~fees collected. in any . eombined storm and sanitary sewers b.y relaxing a federal ' year must cover at least 60 percent ; of . the cost, of permit requirement.:. It allows tlie EPA.to give larger, cities °~.developing and administering the point aource elements of more time to obtain a permit and would completely waive :the state's water quality program. , . the permit requirement for smaller cities by allowing,.tiiem to join in a larger urban area's water quality plan, ; Nonpoint Pollution Control and WatershedPlanning. , The legislation requires states to develop assessments of waters impaired by nonpoint source (IVPS) pollution within two years of enactment. Citizens are authorized to petition . s. to add or delete waters from the state assessment. EPA is ' . Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building 41- Denver, Colorado 80203-1784 • 303/866-3521 0 Page 4 - . . . . • • r_ . ' _ ; . . , , • tGi2:::tit:::i;;ii'ii:i.iii:[[::;;:[:Ci;:r;:c::::::::':•:ii:i:it:t:i:i:: . .::.,;:,...:.:..~:::.,.,;:..,:•.:.::,..:y,,:,,:.,:.y.::.,...:.:i; ;;i:ii;`;iii::::`iii:i:i;[:;;:i;ii:i:?;::3ii;;iii [ii:i<tt%:t.[t:;t:::2iii[[i:'ii:.iti:>ti:ttt[>rii:rftc:t:}:;`i;:a:::2['i:i9i:::i:::::iC'•`::::in::t:::.: : T"'?f''~ i~:i :.:::,:......................:.:.::,::::::.::::.:....................::::~~:'.'...'.'..~i.. . . (News. from the Departme?rts, a . - . . . periodic jearure 'o}' rhis _ be .felt inthe `areas .of 'increased program demands and newsletter,,.. appears ~when, significant changes in ,rw,rdare ;increasedinmate litigation. ' Any person who believes that t"egislation - ar udministration are. reponed by '-Colorado's .his or her rights are being violated may obtain appropriate executive departmcnts and. agencies); relief from a federal court in addition to attorney's fees. . : - . .fAs one soucce .concludes:; _ ItELIGIOUS - . FREIDOM. RFSTORATION ACT MEANS.* NEW. MA1vDATE5 FOR - STATE °qihat thismeans, in plairi English, is that virtually CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES' every judicially approved resfriction -on inmate religious practiae in a prison or jail is now open to legal challenge. Colorado's correctional facilities will face new federal %fi~ It is :a, brand;.-new-;.ball game 'for institution-imposed requirements in -1994 as a result of the passage of Public „ restrictions on iniriate.religious practices and this new ball' Law 103-141, the Relil!ious Freedom Restoration Act game wilt be played under new rules which put a much Signed by President Clinton in November, 1993, the law .'greater burden. on. conections to: justify restrictions on forbids any local, state; or ferleral agency from imposing _-.:inniate; religious.practices.~':; (Correctional Law Reporter.•.:. \ a"substantial burden" on anyone's free exercise of religiop February, 1994) t: - unless the burden can .be justified as' ."furthering a' , • rt . . : - . - compelling state interest.".. Ttie lawis :viewetl ..by .:1'he implicahons of the new law :for C~olorado : correctional officials. as greatly expanding inmates', rights ,~n~tiona[ faciliries:aiaze;uncertain at this time. However, by changing the rules by which the practice of religion by DepaztmentofCorrections:officialsbelieyethat, depending •...f-. inmates will be judged. .~on the number and type~of inmate= requests, the costs of . : . . . . . . . . . • . : compliance.to tt?e°state may be signif i cant: ` The significance of this mandate for states is likely to . . . . , . . . . , : . - . . , . . , _ . : . .Y. : '..1'~.~:::;:::;:;:::?:!::~:;i 'L; ::;::>};:;{i:v:•:'?:'::•',:,i:.':i'4i::.:.}!:?`i :::.::.:..:::',:•'?i::.:ti;:;: ~:,:,~:j~:tii'::;'''~}}ti::;:iii:':::i ~:•:'i:.j:<!:;':•,:';;:':i;:;:iii: ii'i:4: 1f'1i{C!' (7he Local Front, a regular feature of this newslener, included..in, the bill, to offset the costs of_ compliance. highlights federal and state mandates which may impact local governments). ~ HR 3636.the Telecommunications Infrastructure Act, is viewed as a major pre-emption of - MUNICIPAI.ITIES MONTI'OR PENDING FEDERAL :local government franchising authority in the area of MANDATES telecommunications. Municipali'ties aze concerned that the bill provides no local government role in franchising Colorado cities and towns are continuing. to monitor agreements for phone companies that provide cable legis lation being considered by Congress that contains services. . In addition, the *bill appeazs - to pre-empt significant new mandates for local government. Through municipalities that currently have franchising. authority the efforts of the National League of Cities (NLC) and the from regulating telecommunications services. The bill is Colorado Municipal League (CML), municipal officials expected to have a negative fiscal impact for municipalities have been alerted to three bills which may have major due to the fact that if a.cable operator- or affiliate offers impacts on these units of local government:. telecommunications services such as phone services; the `municipality.cannot receive franchise fees for that part of - The Comnrehensive Occupational Safetv and Health the operator's service.., Reform Act of 1993 (HR 1280, S 575) would mandate ' OSHA coverage to all state and local governments. The • S 1547, Reauthorization of the Safe Drinkin bill would place several new requirements on state and Water Act, continues to be a concern to - local local employers, including: criminal penalties and ;•governments despite recent attempts to modify someof its : substantial fines for ofricials found to be in willful mandates. Major remaining problems with the . bill ~ violation of OSHA regulations in cases of deaths or serious include: the standard=setting process; the contaminant ' injuries; safety and health training. requirements for all selection process; and monitoring flexibility. (See Focus, employees; and expanded record keeping and reporting page 3 this issue.) requirements. No funding to state or local governments is " Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building di Denver, Colorado 80203-1784 0 30 . 3/866-3521 0 Page 5 • " . . Enbies ta bold ttalks lrtdicate reeQnt c/ranges or additions to the Scorecard. :.;..,.';~,...~::.>•:;::.:::;:~::':<:[:>":::':'s.::;~:'<~~:;;~>.?.r:;;'<z>:>:::X: iii:i,Ji ii::?iiiii:Ci: . . ~::~::::::.::::..:..:::.::..::::::::::.~.:~..................._............,I,~,,,~,,,,~......_:..................._........................... . . . . . . . . ~ BILL # SPONSOR TITLE ~ DESCRIPTION STATUS FAUCATION , . " _ ifR d Bildee (l141) ReautJwn¢ation of Elemsntary and Providu federal'funds to !u!p disadmnfaged . Houae, Education and labor Sic+ondary Pdurnlion Ad afudau with rmedid readin8, matk eer- - SubonmmiKes on E(ementmy, Secondary and Vocational Educau+ion - . _ , . . (luarin8a !uW 7113193, 7115193, 7113193) . . . ' " MonEed up and placed on calsndar jor floor - ~ , ndion on 2123191 : vr~ ,.Paased on 3124194 , . _ ,4-<. • Rsfe?ral m Senate Labor I11919I ~ HR 421 Collina (D-IL) Fquity in Sporm Requirea.univereitiea tn diecloee paiticipation retee ' House Fducation and Labor ~ . mW ProBram, iniPPort.expendidtrea m coLLege. - - Subcommittee on Poatsecondary - athletic programe: ' t:`.:. ~Fducetion and Training ~ HR 987 ' Mille.r (D-CA) Gun Free Schooln Act In order W receive federal nid, etatcs muat - : ~ House Education and Labor implement giui control in echoofe; Providee grants; -~Subcommitlce on Elementary Fducation ~ . to achool dietricta'for 'brime prevention: HR 1793 Schroeder Gender Equity in Fduce6on Act Requirca etstea (o eddreas the neede of pregnent Houee EducaOon and Labor (D-CO) .,.md paronting teeos.. Iriclidea~HR 921 HR 1793 Su4ioommittec on Elementsry . . . ~ • . Secondary nnd:Voce6onal Fducadon.'. HR 1800 Unaoeld, (D-WA) . a - HR.1800 Suboommiuee on Poet Secomdary Education and 'Iminiag. md'. . ubcommi 3 ttee o . u Elementary, Secondary md , ~ . . , _ - . - ~ Vocatiooal Educadon' IIW[RONMIIV'f . , . - , S IIII Bancri.s (D-M7) Federal Water Pollwtioa Cotirol Raqucres rtatea m idaaaif'y "usia" of.watas 'ado ~ Siowte Enviroxiwent dnd Public: WonEs. ' Ad dawdards and namerieal lunita, and unplerweW c - Subcnmisdtee on CYa+n Watsr, Fiaberrei ' "c+o!ePmhenaiw proB?aa to inonitor drs qudlay and WW e (/rearinga lield oe'6/13, 7/l; : . . navigable watera and aquntic sadiresnt witlibi fhs;:_.. :-7/lI, 7127, 8/I, 815, and 91I5) at , • ute Fw7we fo unplanent themandatoq NPS Approved fo'r full `oonrmittes wrtlwwt, plan may reault or bas oj?S% W 5096 of tha'" `wiiendwents (219I) c' ~ atata'r foml NPS'allooation Reqrurar amtas ho . Repo~tad (1/15194) - ~ . - , . > aoJlsd in permit fsea auffwtiens funding to e»ver . _ . . „ ` , . . eo°leai il~an'6o96" ojrbs ooa~a in.' developoig•drid - . admurutmn8 ths.ProBroni• . . S 1198 Mitchell (D-ME) Lakea Aeeeeement nnd Protection . Requirea etatee w edopt enforceable,'numerical' Semte Fnvironment and PubGc Worke Act water quality etandaide for lekea within tavo yeats ' - Subcommittee on Clean. Water, Fiehoriee ' of publication of criteria: ~.arid WiWlife (hoaring held 8/4193) S 1547 Raucu.e (D-MT) RGautlwiiuation ojSafi Drinking Requirea aYatea w%vrk w" wdiridud systeens m F.RVironment and Publrc Worka (heasin8 Water Ad. dsvdop small sydem c+vmplianee P^oSmms, and;w . held and onmplded 10127193) ' provide annual reporta on onmpJioxee.,,. Osiginal bdJ orderal repoited - S 1019, placed on calendar 41I5190 ~ HR 768 Englieh (D-0In No ehort tide Amende CERCIA to roqu've certain atatea W liouse Faergy and Commercc eonuibuu to officr etetcs' ehare of clcan up coats. - Subcommiuee oo Traneportadon • Houee Public Worka and Transportation ' - Subcommiuee on Waur Reaourcea HR 1818 Mnrkcy (D-MA) National Beverage Contniner Reuee Requirca etatea w either acliieve a 7096 recycling House Eoergy and Commorce , aM Recycling AM ' rate for beer, wine cooler; and eoft drink HR 1818 Subcommittee on' , containers oi instiwte a 5.10 depoeit on boWee end Traneportation and Hezardoue Matcriels ~ cens. S 818 Hatfield (R-0R) =.S 818 Swate Commerce, Sciwce & • , Treneporta6on . • HR 2543 , Oberatar Nonpoint Soures Wuter PoAufion Rsquiru dates to reviss and rubmit Nonpoint Public Works and Tmraportation " (aMN) Pisvenlrow Ad • Managsment Progriwn to recsivs eitlur funding or - Subeonumdtee on Merclwunt blarine rtnd.. _ permita fo diselwrgq dredge, or fi71. Pisheriea; Agriculpve; Enyironment, G}ed'q . . & Rwal Dwdopment; Wbter Resowces & • . Enivnnmenf; Environmau & Nahim/ Resrureea (hearinge beld 3122194 aid' ~ • ' ' 3123194) Refened to HR 39I8 IU-ALTH ' . . , . - , S 649 Riegle (D-MI). Medicare Fnrollment Improvement Requirea the Secretary of HHS to eeteblieh e Part Senau Fiaence and Protection Act,- A Medicnro buy-in egreement with all statea to . " enrotl eGgible individus?s automntioally, and bill; . - ~ state Modiceid plaoa for the premiume. Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building •Denver, Colorado 80203-1784 o 303/866-3521 •-Page 6' Entrigi lA'bold i~alla Indkats iaceet tGaRgts or cddiHorts to the Scorecnrd. • . , ' - r.' ~ . t. . . . , . : : : . . . . . . ~:::::;<.>:.:>::::;:•::<.::•;:.;•..;•.;;::::.: . . . . . . : . : . . :::.::::<;<o~•;;:.;;;:.;;;:;::.;:-•;:.;,:::: :•;:.;;>s:«•;~.;;:.:;.;::.;..<:;:;;:>.:::;:;>>:<:>.:<>:;<::•;s::»>,;>:z:>:->:a:.>:::>: ; ~ • ~ ` . ~ . .:;,:::•;:~•;:•,;:•;r>:;.:;~;:;~::<?•::;•:::~::;~::G;>;i:::i::. . t<:~ : •..:.:::.:.•:.:::::::;>v::.::::; to::s:~:+':: .:::?t~:;;;;:~>:o::o::•>::~.: ~ ii:>......:.:,•: :w:. s: :•::~>:::t.>:>:?;~ :::•::::::::>t:.ro. :•::::::::.to>r.:~;::;.. . BILL # SPONSOR TITLE :STATUS S 732 -7. KennodY C6iWhood Immim'vation,-ProBr*m Re9uires stetoe to eamblieh rogietriae of the Seoste Iaboi and Humen Reaourcan., . immun'vation hiewriea of c4ildren:':". ;Pessed on 11/4/93 " - • Paod'mg in Houee Faergy md Commerco % . • t - Committee - • ^ . ° . - Subcommittee on Heahh end Enviroament . ' . . . . S 1757 - Prssidrwt Qi~mw'r'Hwo4li Sreauity, = Rsqaoss uare, to: nrbnnit a.aats Ma++.forl~~' Labor and Hanran Remurru, Farancs, ' . Ad. aPPr»ad ojNwopropoatd progrnni;'providt . Armsd Smvieea, Pduoatioa and Labor, IIR 360U. Pos»nr,widt a stadnid¢sd assespaept Covawiwmt OP~n?, l~;einry, Nabunl, Gsplwdt (D- and aw adiridrwl Pg= of aons; a . '~'eiaobJah d'~ ~ Rerowrq, -Post O~Sce aird CirrT Servier . . MO) Madie+ok/ eiadiaaA) wsed9 P~B~ ~ !!~daatr of ' R~a; : Vdanaw ~ews;und Wa9a aad ' , ; ` .nwsue l~omu or inton~diafs.ams • . g,_ Iad~petlorr Msau • = ; , , . . , _du n~atallj iefuidad. . , ~ Coiwmdt~e bmeoigalheld. ~ , . HR 130 Calline (D-IL) Madiceid Women'e Bmie Health Requiroe etata Mediceid progrems W.provde.,:_? Hotise Faergy md Commerce: ' Cove~age Act of 1993 coveraga of inemmogra'me md paP emeeie. - Subcommiuee on Heaith . HR 307 Qwllen No short title R state Medicaid ro.. . p gnims:to prnve House Faergy md Commerca . = , • (lt-TM ~.clmical.wcisl worken ae e mnndetory tienefit - SubcommiCeean Health and . . . . , . -imder.Medicaid: ' 'Favironmeat > - ~ . ~ - • . Quillen (R-17V) No s6oR titlo ~ r . Reqwr~s etetee to provde for the mclueion of fhe.~ Houee Faergy end Commerce xrvicoe.of re gred professionel n r320H3 Madicem md Madicud S H~ VNnys eod Suboommimca on Health Willai (R-'17V) Mo short titk Reqi?irc~ smtes'to prvvide fqr.mclus MedofmLceaeed Howe;Faa~ md Commerce , . prnctical nwsee imder Medicaro md•d -$ubcommitiee on Health * • ' . . , . ' ~rrr •t ' - . . . . , . . , . . . ~ . . F HOUlO W~yt aOd MOBO! ~i . t;. ~ ~ s ~ ' • , , . A S~IGt6 O~ }TO~fb ~ . HR 425.. . . Vucanovic6, : Medicsid MemmoB!aPbY ~a~ Requi+'r+ state Medicaid plane W provida coversge: House Paer~^ end Commerce.: (R-N~ Act of 1993 , . . , ap meutmogram~: - ::~,=.N•. , r s.- • - Suboommiuee on Hoelth ; . HR 438 Wydcn (D-OR) . Lons Term Cnne lnsuronce , Requins etetea to adopt legielntion iega~dmg Houee Ener~ md Commerce u Com~er ProtxtanAot of.1993 _ bng-ferm cnre a~•recommaodad by the.Naboosl Suboommiuee on Heelth ' Aseociotion of Inswnnce Commiesione~e or elee: Snboommitfee on Commcrce . lone Medicnid funde. Alw requirustates W melce' . . . : . . . , - ~ , . . ce comumera. .x. . . mformsbon aveileble~to inewao HR 632 Snowe (R-M~ Ci~mrdmnshlP ~u'~ Ae s coodition of receiving Modicnid funde, statee. Houee'Faergy end_Commerce,'. ti. . Rea nebilitiaAct P~ are requirod W adopt lews W provide basic Subcommiuee o n"Healt6. P(OftChOR ~ (1g118 l0 PCf800! B116JGM [O ' . . - ~ ' _ . . _ . , BuaidienshiP ProceodinBe. • ~ . HR 1580 Dooley (0.CA) Advence Diroctivo Fzpemion Act Reyuirem slatee ro provide notice to individusle Houee Waya and Meane enrollad in Mcdicuid of t6e'v right tv accept or - Subcommittao on Health " • • rofueo medical caro end the'v rig6t to formulate. Houee Faergy end Commeme ' . ` edvsnce diroetives. - Subcammiuee oa Heahh HR' 1612 CoUins (D-II.) Medicsid lnfent Mortality Requirea statea ro'pheee m Medicaid covemge of Houee Faergy md Commerce , Ameadments pregnent women eod infenta up tn 185% of the._; :'~'Subcummiuee'on Health - povcrty levet. _ ' . . HR 1614 Collina (D-IL) Hospita? Closioge Commud~y (teHef, Aequirea emte Medicaid plepe to include provinioue Houee Fnergy aad Commerce ~ - p~ thet, m the event of the cloeing of eny hoepitnl 'm ' ' ~ the etate, ePPropriately rcapond to ffie reauiting , diminiahment in the eveilabiliry of 6ealth eervices , ia ffie affectal erea. . . 'a` . - HR 1683 Rictiunleon No ehort tillo . Requirea emte Modicnid progreme m provic(e - , Houae Faergy end Commerce . (D-NM) . . ' mendnWry coverage of eervicee furniehed by nuree - SubcommiGee on Heslth & Fav'vonment - • praetitiooen and clinical nwee.epecialiete. • ' _ . . . HR 2675 , Meek (D-FL.) No ehort tide Requiree etates W apply the income end rcaoiuce Housa Faergy and Commerca _ ~ - - . etendard_esmblietiod under the eupplemeatsl ` . ` . . - • , , ' eecurity progrom under Tide XVI (Mediceid) in determining eGgibiGty for medical aseintance: . - ' - . • tilJINAN SERVICFS S 1351 Reid (Ddd~ 1~graGon StabilizsGon Act Prohibhe faderel finenciel aeeietence to my state or Senate Judiciary `a . etate egency t6et'doee not verify the immigmtion . ~ . etatus of eliene aPPlY~B for beaefits ffiroug6 tho . . . . • uee of the automaeed System for Alien Verificetion~ (SAVE). ' . . . Legislative Council 0 029 State ~Capitol Building • Denver, Colorado 80203=1784 0 303/866-3521 ~0" Page. 7 ' Lntriss in boU halics indkate recent eltaages or oddhions to tht Scctacard. . t . . . . . . : ' ' t . . . - . .......:..t:iti t[;tittt[:i: ' :::...::.o:";r.: BILL # . ' SPONSOR TITLE. - , . . ;.DESCRIP'TION.-"~ ~ . ~ . STATUS ,r. HR 2557 'Solomon (R-N» . No"short tide_ Requirce states t"n u mplement worlcfae for•all ablo- . Houee Ways end Meaus. - . badied e4gble rocipiente without depeodente or, , • , - . ~ ' " ~ ` : k ; I. _ z. . _ looe 5096. of AFDC edminievstive funds. ~ HR 3320 Babmy (D-Ni) InurigraAioe Sfabdimtion Ad Requora a aWte'or JooaJ gorerni»ent or agenry to, -1~~ . • ms* the bnee47ndon atapla ojaliend upplYb?S.for = Suboaamdtae oe International taw, . MDL', MeJicnid,' uxemployixene.aniiijrsnaaAion;, Imntigrntion.a~d Rsfugua . . . ' . food ata+nPe,~or eerrpin Iwiuw~g benejb, onbas (l~Sa l~e1d 3123190) . aasuku~es for 1hess progwn~a HR 3363 , . Mnzzoli (D-Kl) Employer Senctione Improvemeat : Requira sterca to enforco omployer emchone as u Judiciary . under Sec4on 104 of ~ . • . _ _ : , _ -tltie Ommbue' Crime Controi nnd Sefe Stroetn Act of , HR 3500 Michel (R-IL) Wolfare Reform . : Required etatea to increase petemity eamblishment - House Waye md Meene,. Rulea. 'ludiciary; ~ , - _ rstee w 90% md,µunlas etntea pses legisledoo; . Oovemmont Opetations, Energy aad . r exdnpting th y emeelvea. no atog Pa mB welfaic ~ ~ Comm~rce, Fducation and IaborI Bmkiug, tienefite to parents under 18 yeun of'ege eiop= , mce nod U=ban .4fiaiis, end Agriculture- • ; , , • . F'~n , . ` . . . , : . . we - ' incrcasmg. Ifare c6eclce ahan famrhes on welfare Jeriuary 28,. 1994 $ubcommittee referrals 8 ~ . . . ~ . have,addAronnl ch~drca end termmetecaeh ~ ~ rt r• ' ' • ' . . . . ~ welfare benefite of fmu6ea whoee preachoo 1 ~ ? r . . . . : _ : ~ chitd~en tmvc nat been immumzad .'r HR 3588 fiood/ut8 (R-PA) L9wTd Abme nnd Ne8led ~ Amanda du L9br7d Abwse HroreAqon"and~ a ~ ' , . EdnaWon a»dLbor . Acenw~tabrlily , Ti~weet Ad to nquw . . ~ - dAfBl.lO I4[N IR~i6'lA1WN'~ ~ ~ ."i.. . - ' O - . - , priuriding for die proreerrtion f a per~na wM , , . . . , , ~ 1 - . reportr eh~Td abase o? negis~t withort rs,umnoMa k 108IAg.8M11V ' .^t t • . ~ _ ~ n. ' • e. _ . k . , . . . - _ a. n ~ ' . J . . . . - . . • . : i 'i°: ~8 , . ~d, JUS77CE. . y N - ~.r _ . .,rr, . . . rSS (Sunilar ' Flatcfi.(R-U'n Crime Control Act of 1993 Require emtce to 'ropoR aod mamtaiq a regutcy of Seaace Judiciary. IegislaGon. HR : . ' pereons convicted•of crimioat offeoeee . : . ' . 324. HR 515, HR • . _ ' - ` . minore 123~ , . . ° _ . . . . ~ ~ S 11 . Biden (D-DE) Violence Againet Women Act of . To obtain federnl,grante'fo help combaf.violence Seaete Judiciary (amended 5/27/93, 9/10/93);' 1993 egaipet.women.,etetee muetpeY for exeme_of:rape placed on calander 9/10/93 . victime. . . , . ~ _ S 689 Bradlcy (D-Nn Interstate Cbild Support Requiroe.emtea w heve auwmated ou-liria or, betch - S 689 Seuau Finance Fnforcement Act acceea W iafonaietion mgsidiing reeidenhel . eddreaaea..employere. mcome: eeseb,-md medieal . meurance of abeent parente. Mendetes'smte ohild, euPPnrt guidelinee.', HR 1600 Roulcema (R-Nn ' Requirea etetea to honor legsl and binding cour( - HR 1600 House Ways end Meane•r ordere, eubpoenee, nnd werrmta iaeuod'by enother ]udiciary; Bmlting, Finence & Urben ' ~ emte. State Gceneing boarde end profeeeional „ APfaire: Armod Servicee: Education & Labor' ` - boarde eha11 with6old Gceoseu of delinqueat - Judiciary refertsl on 6/24/93 . parente.., . -Subcommiaee on Economic md . . . Commerciel Law ~ . HR 1961 Keanelly (D-Cl) Requiree etates to: heve en.on-line informstion ' - HR 1961 Houne Ways & Meam, 4 , eyatem with data on abeent psrente; msinteia _ Judiciary, Natwal Reaourcea, Benking, ° rogietriea of eupport ordeee; record eociat aecurity Fimnce & Urban Affaire, Armed Servicea, numborn: nnd withhob occupetiooel, profeeaional,.. Foroip Affnira, Poet Office & Civil Service. utid'bueineee liceneee of delinquent,psrente. . and Adminietration. S 891. Cruig (R-ID) Federal Crimiml Recorde - Requiree ihat etate criminal recorde ayeteme be _ Senete Judiciary . • ' Identifica6on Act acceesible by telep6one by a licensed desler, child - ~ care'provider,'Inw enforcemont officer oi court of• ` lew. Statea without e crimiml beclcground c6eck y • to ecreen hendgun pucchaeea may lose funde. v . . . , . , ~ . ~ . - : f . . . . . - . . . . : _ . . ~ . . _ . . . . . . i Legislative Council • 029 State Capitol Building, 0._Denver, iColorado.80203=1784 0=303/866-3521 v.Page 8. . . N • ' Lyrbtas iA bold lfalla indkate reuRt dwaget or cddittons to the Scorecurd. _ . : . . ' f ~ ~ _ . r' • ~ ~ . ' . :e:>::>;:i:::»:::::>;;•;:•;:.::.:n;:•;:;;.;:.;;;;;:;:;;;:;:~;>;:•>;:•;s:;;:•;;::>;:;•;;:;::::•:::..;::::.~:;:: ` ~ ' . . •....v.:.; . . • a::.;•.:. y.;:::::::.;•.;•:.; ::::::..:.:::.y::.:•;::::::. . ~ c. n,a.oc.,: . . . . . . : . ~ : : . . : . ~:v:::;.:: :•::..~.:;:..::.:.::.~:.:::.y:::: :r:.:::::: ~~M. :f:Rc,,: ~ r?: tv ~ :r:p::;;>:::o-.::t:;...:.::;.>:..c::o::::o-'::.:::: ~..;:M1:::y::::.:::: . •::r. • ...a: x.r:.: . . . :'iir:%2;•`::2ii?::;ini;o:~?:~:::;::i: :'S:;;i:i:i::;:.;::'%L•.'it:`•:i;i%%;ii%.. :..%2;2:;:i:<:<:::C;:;:;•>::`;;`;:;i,ii;:ii~iii:i;fi:::~ir;~:~i~ii:::ii> ~i ~ . : • :2:'td:Si':'<;~:fi::}::;i~: . ~:.:::tc.: •v:.: ;':;:;ro-:::.;::. ~~>::~>;>;;:;;;.s:;>:a BILL # SPONSOR TITLE DESCYtIP,.TION STAT[1S : S 1069 Duronberger . Jsoob Wdterliug Crimes Ageiast Requiree etatee tn entei mformntion m the etete law ~ S]069 Seoate Judiciary (R-MN) , Childron Regiatrntion Aet . • aaforcemeni systasn ead 'm ILe Natiooal.Crime -;.w,; . - ~ . , . , ' . Informntion Canfe?`computer naworte on peisone.-. _ ' . . ' _ convicted of a criminal ofleaee agamsf a mmor. R._ Failuro to comply'wiU result ia n 2596.reduction of . Omm'biie Cnme Control aod Sefe Street Act of ~ . . ; . . . , 1968. HR 334 Ramstnd NR 330 Hoass Jwdiciary, Subcommittte oa (R-bfN) . . ~ • _ oct~ ' } ~ ~ ~ Glowe aW Gliinow! oppmved by Nonss ~ ?0/93: • ~ Refirrad ao ~Sawre J+idie+a?7 . , ~ . ' " • " ' fr 7 ` t.Rtfes?ed fo HR I092, pmaed Howse 313119I~ ' `nd wsbMd unm AR 3355. . ~ , . - ' • 7 _ -'f" ' • • . . . . . t " - COAfAN1~Cf ~.OAUJ~1/tQ! A8J7g/M{C/tti' S 1511 Dorgnn (0.ND) Violeat Crime Praveation Act of Requira etatea to elimmate croditing of time_.` Judiciary._ . ~ 1993 toaerd'xrvice of seatoncro ma rowerd for havmg , ' z.. .bx,u _ `oq good behsvioi. oi up to bee 10096 of ~ . dmg ~ fim "uoder Sation~506 of ihe Omwbue C e+ . CouUol~sod Safe SUeets Act of 1968 :./Ueoy ~dmtOla06r HI1/ tenmg Oc a,,s '.ij a b : ~i~ , . , . , dekmdmf convictad of a iexwil eot: tE the.ro4ueet- V , rr of t6e victirri or;lose I0S6 of;grnnt S 1381 ~ Liebemwn VioleM Crim Reductiae Act Requue~~ etaw b eoect legielabon wALm tao yeeis Judicisry t~•. . (D-Cn • . , . t~t ~ unlemeob i 20 . , 1 . . p , year ~tOf~ tl~D1WC6 f0 t t~' . , ` . valeot nroer crunmeb who oommit e cr~e ue~ig j ~ , f . .a fir~arm, or Ioee SOS6 of fuuds from die O~'bue ` '~fi ~ , ' ' Crmu Control wd SafaStree~ Aot of 1968 " ~''.-x; ~ . _ ;y: ~ , . . , S 1607 Biden (D-DE) Violau Crimo C.outrol aod Iaw . Attorney Oenerel will coneWct 10 regionsl ` 7udicin*Y (amended aod pmeed by Seaete Fnforcroment Aot of 1993 piiwoc : 7556 'of spaoe will.be dedicafed W 'l 1'/19/93) - . , • primonen from'9ualifYmB st+ta.. To:quahfy'shta~ . muu implemwt' of 'Uuth=ia-eeatea eod ~ Pro-~ - . ' . . ..Y . ,.E.,.- . _ Awi aatention. «ftbUr? rup fWih ma ceaa o . . _ : 'proteclive orden. re9uire sexualty viokat predeWn , : ; to rogular their currant addreae upcm-roleeee from . . ' . ` . ~ Qrieon or psrok, eod onforce'immigintion laws: HR 454 Frmlc (D-MA) FuU Faith aod Crcdit for ChiW Roquiroe etatea to give fiill fsith md crodit to child Howe 7udiciary Support Orden Act • -aupport orde» entarod by eieter amtes end Suboommiltee on Admiriietrntive Law eod edmmietretive bodiea:. . , . , ~ Governmental Relabons (emeodod 3/11Y93);. Rcported to the Hoiieo ~(emcodod 8/2/93). , , ~ . . ' . . . Referted W Senato Judiciery (8/3/93) . HR 840 Kemody' Netional SWlcor Roduction Act of.. To svoid reduction of federel fuode for criaie ' Houee Judiciary (D-MA) 1993 - . prevention. etatea nro required W peee lswe thdt - Subcommittee on Crime . . meke it unlawful foren individunl W willfully or ` -Ucioudy follow or hereee m iodividuel while - • - ~ _ Wroateniog physical violence. Also rcquird law eaforcemwt egaaciea w report informstion . . . -B~~B domaGc viol~ca tu a etatewide regietry. , _ . • HR 915 Schroeder C6iEd Support Economic Securiry Requ;ru smcea co.hove emrewido uniform rulas of Houee Judiciary (D-CO) Ad of 1993 child wpport enforcement. Requiree statee W have - Subcommittee on Economic md . ' on-line ncaae to detebesee meinteined by effite md Commerciel Iaw , " local juriedictiom., Requirea etntea to edoQt - House Ways md. Mune . . ' legielsdon eitniler W the Uniform Interemto FamilY SubcommiUee on Humm Reaouicoe Suppon Act. . ~ . - _ HR 1534 Mnrtinez PrivW Savrity OfPieers Quslily 'Requiree atatea m emura the quslity`aod•" Educetion ead IBbor (Approved eRer mnrk~ip (D-CA) . Aeeuranoe Ad aompetence of pri vete eecurity servicea md the'v by Educstion end Labor.. SubcommitCee on, . , . . - r~ 4.,~. peraoemel ee e condition of eGgibiliry w receive' °Humm Ruourcee 9/30/93) ' - fuode under 1'ide II of the ]uvenile lustice md ' Del6queria5' Prevention Act of 1974. . . . HR 1616 Colline (D-IL) Heodguo Regis4ntion Acf of,1993 Requiros etatea w develop 6mdgun rogisuation'.., , Houee Judiciary . eystams a6ich meet'federnl requiremeate or'be 9ubcommiCea on Crime. . . subject W a fodenil haodgun rogishation eyatem md ~ . - . lose all fimds`under the Crime Control end Sefa . , St+ats Aa of 1968. . , ~ ~ . . Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building Denver, Colorado 80203-1784 ye". 30378663521 Page "9 ~ _ • Cdaist th Dola itdtlcs tnacuts. receet chaages or aldit3ons to the SeorecaM.~ . ~ ' . _ 1 -S J_ . . _ . . . . . . . . (:r:L:~CVF'r:.'~.'•::~:';:i':4j:;;'i;:::v~i:y~:;::~:iSi:?::;:yj:%:i:.}: ...~~'~;::.::.:.;,.,:.;.::,:.;:.ti'..,.:.y:.,::~.~.,.~[$_.:,:•,::i?;•:i:;iS:~:i"'::~:'::':;}_i:;i:'i:''%''':'.i;i;:':::;:;;::~:`•£':;:•`:~:5.:~:'::;±,:3',:',Y::;~::i:v:''•'::i:~~:',:i:i::•`:~:i%~;;:'7G5:i:::::. : .:'s::: ..,y.;;..: . BILL # . : SPONSOR . TITLE " DESCRIPTION . . : STATUS HR 2872 : McCollum' Crime Control Act of 1993 - Requirea etatea to paes legieladon prohibifing,theRodt~ Judieia?y . , : (R-FL) , produation. dievibution, receipt,"or poeeeseioq of Subi+vmmifus rsfsrinla 111I193 . _ mnuriale depicting a peroon uoder' 18'eogeging m Subaomrwilus on.lntelledun/ Propsny xxually explicit condud w be eligble for certein (heasugr /utd 1110194) . faderal fw~ding.. Roquirca maintenence of stste, : . , - ~ regiehation piogrema for listing persom convicted . of crimea agemet e ctiild: Failum to comply may _ . • ' , , . " , ' result in e2556 roduction in certein federel ; :1 ' funding • . - [iX 327E . lohnston (D-FL) r faw Enforea»snt ond Comrdioxal Requima rmter` w provide a!id of nQ /aw Judremry .;.PI)Sesrr F,mPJq'raent Rsgirbation;.. arforceniwu aed corrediowal oo'rcerr w.biat ;~Ad . sinu 19901 indud6ig'PBIA8Q1Print nwwbeis, to . - =i an ageaey duignafed by t6s ACoiney Geneanl. ` . NR 2892 ' MeColtum Re9u+,+'sr afatsr to dw-go ientewcing laws w: ,/udrewiy. - (R-PL) aarch8an e for bedr w wd na»~s R , , . , . ,~8~P~ s4+~e+ = Subommmi#ee on [nteAielual ProPrt! , atatu to Pa).SO pereent ojaonsfndios~oosta at an ` d Judieia! Adminisfintion (heorw8a luJd . ' . - - , ' ~ . . - . _ _ . ° frdaqwl primnr aiid rsqu've tlwf a mAgs of ~x.'~ 211019I) . offsedsra.acrve 85 pa+amt of Oleir siae aent"eea.~ LABOR . _ . _ ° - . . , S 627 Kenaedy ` Rafoim of Devie-Bacon . [ncreeeea tho size threa6old:under,the.Davie-Bacon:;-t ...Seaete Labor aud Human Reeourcee ' (D-Mp) Act foi convacts for new' cooatiuction tepeu elte~ation, or domolmon -'Steu aad local lews ? . , a ` . - . , . . , . ; , . , , . . . , . ~ ' • ~ pertawng to wagea end benefite are. P~P~ . , ; . . . : ~ unloee thay conform with'tLe new. rcquuemenfa:,r - . . . . kIR 1256 Fcanlce (R-Ct') : No short'titk' • Requiree stet~e t'o eetablieli a syeum undar'wlucti:.'. ' Houee Ways and Mcatie ~ worlcore mey pwAase'msureooe.to cover'the coet. - : of heetth'insurmce while imemployed. HR 1280 Por+d (D-bf/) CoWnhenaiw Oecupatiowu! &rpanda OSHA aovemge to a~ats wiJ -$R 1280 Houas Adri~mis6neiow S4/a7 and HsaEfb Rifonot Ad.o.r . lood e~Plolta ' , ` Bducntwr tuud'I.abor`(h~arfngiTiald . 1993 */28193,1114193, 7131193, 9118193, _ . : , . ~ a ~ 10130193,;.1110194),,adercd reported and ' S 575- gennedy' .~•x. , ar»aided.3%!0/9e1 ~ (bMA) ::FyB+avmnrdtte llear»g'7/29193 -:Subi+orwmdfe~ on Labor StawJarda ' . ' . . . . . _ , ';(6+mrin8s:hdd'1/10/9Ij. . ~ , . . S 575 Snwte Labor'pnd Human Rtmurcea (beannga held 7111193, 11919I, and 313194) . . , HR 2937 Fewell (R-IL) Occupational Safety and Health Requiree emtee w conform labeling, content and` House Fducation and labor - Reform Act. . . 6azerd informution W foderad requiremrnts. Subcommittee on Isbor Standarde Yolunuer fire dcpetunents end aimiler public" (6earing heW 9/14/93) : - eervice providere aro exempt: TRANSPORTATION " . . . - , . S 809 ~ Dorgan (D-ND) Alco6ol Container Act. Requirea etatea to prohibit open contsiners .of Seueu Environment & Public Wortce . . . , alco6ol in vehiclee or loee S% of etate"6ighwaY' . funde. . ~ S 1424 ' Dorgun (D-ND) Nationsl PoGco Puratit PoGey AM Requirea etetea to eaact legielation malcing it Senau Commeroe, Scionce, end , unfawfiil for the driver of a motor vehicle W take _ Transportation . • ' evaeive action. if pureued by police. ltequiree atete . public agenciee to eeteblin6 a ho[ purauit poGey and . ' provide ndequate ttaining for ell lew enforcement. : . . . officets., S 1630 Bingamon (D- Hmdgune in. Se6oole Act Requiree statea w enect legielation tLat would EavironmCnt nnd Pubfic Worke NNO . require rmmediate rovocauon of one,'e;dnvas ~ _ - . Gcenee foc S.yem or until the age of' 18, • whichever ie longer. iP they bring e hendgun inw en elementary or eecondary echool zone. ` Feilure , . W comply resuhe io with6old'mg S%, sod lator' 10%, of the etate's federal formule highcvsy' fimdaf ' HR 1386 Se.~fiiff (R-N1v) Dnmk Driving Prevention Act of WitL6olde federnl funde from statea whic6 fail w - HR 1386 Hvune Rtblic Worlce sod 1993 _ dam,a pereon driving witha BAC of :08% or . 'I'rensportetion S'6U5 Domenici . • grcater tn be driving while,mtoxicated. - 5 605 Senate Environment and Pub66 (R-NM) ' Worlce ' . . . . ,i-. I Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building 0 Denver, Colorado _80203-1784 0 303/866-3521 • Page 10 e ;•`:n7 ./`1~.. , F ~ C . ~ .r _ , . ° . % bold,UalJer indtcals recsRt ehauges or oddWons to the Seorecnrd. ~ , . , ~ - " , . . . . . . . . , ~::::::::::.::::::::;<:::::::.~,::::::::,>~:.>~:,.r.:;;:.;•:_:::.::::.~ ..::::::::::...y:.>~::::,.•:.;:.::.;~::::::::::::::::::::.;::.;~:::::.~:::::.;~::::::..:.;::::::. . . >::::••,:•.'>•'r.;::'.>:::<:::::h:>.:z~>:::::is<<<,::z: . . . ..n r.... . . . ............:'t":%. . ..........p - - :'':::fi<:'':::•r''::i::'::'•?L.:.-...:.v.•,.:~ :..;.:..:•;•x::a.~.: .r. ~ . . . v.~ : ......::::::?ii:v ;C~!a t;:3`;~t;i;}i`1::c;i~;~:::~<' 5:::.:::: . :.~:.~:.:.r.. :.}•:.~•.1v:::~... ~f..:<:.::.... . t':. •::~d~.. ~ BILL ~ • - SPONSOR TITLE . STATUS . . NR 1824 Kamody.~ Bicycb 8 Pedeatrian'Trausportation. Requires stnua w use 396 of their federnd prfinary. House Public Worlrs & Trsnaportabon , (p_MA) 1mPr'e~t Act s.1 secoodery. md urbm hig6wny fwde to improve . . , t _ ~ . . . bicycle'nnd pedeetrim sctivi6a. . . ~ . . HR 2225 Kim (R-CA). Highaey Coostruction'Private' Requirm etaux w rnnhact aifh private pereom to~ Houee Aib6c Worlce md Tfaneponsiion Investmmt Act fiomco comtruction of toll fncilitia-or ri61c" i., - • , " - ` " ' . rediutioo m ISTEA grante. . HR 2939 Flolca (D-Nl) ' No s6ort tiNe to paes legialafiou'by Sephomber 30.: Houeo PubGe Worlcs and Trensportafion : . , 996 w .hich makee it sw , . . . ~ . • ful for a peroon loee `F ~ . ~ ' - ~ ,a ` ' tlun 21~~yeers of age aod w6o hm a blood alcohol { T:. ' ~ . . . ~ ; • contmt [evel of 0.02% or greater to dnve d mowr a~ . . ' , . . vehicle:~Fsilure w comply`raulte m widkhoWmg „ . . . • . ' ' 3% of certnin trmeporutioo 5mds. , . . • . . WII.FARE - ~ . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . ~ . . . . ~ S 596 . Rockefcller. . Family Proaervation eod Chi1d bill would werhaul. fadenl'piogreme for Semte Fmence ~ (D-WV1 Protection Reform i4et. ' . abueed md negla~fad childrea to provide eaeistancro. ~ ~ . , - W help voubled femiliq WY. i?B~•:~ ~ ~t • ' . . HA 892 Frodce (R-C11 Parontnl Reeponsibility Act. Statas'must ideahfy the biobgicel parenta of Haw Wa md Meana childron rocervmgaAFDC or nek reduchoo~ m?; ~ i4gpC~~~/~ ~ _ • - . _ CY rJ"'^"~' ,b 1[ ' • ".f~. r~^ au ~w` ~t~~.°r,.~ .,~'e n r~ 'Y' HR 944 ' . (unninghom: Raipoasibk VNolfira Ad of 1993~., Deoia AFDC peymenu to iodrvduaFi for my ' Houee Weya eod Meem ' . (R-CA) ~ ' , ~ " _ . • , ; ; weeY ia wluc6 the' mdrvdwl_aorlu oriatundi . . . . c. r - : • : - . ~ edu~sl coursei for Pewer lian 6outs t.. ~ ~ - HR 1384 ~ Smric No ehmt titk - µ ~Kl To be el~gible for:Mediced nimbu'nement, statea House Faergy sod Commerce ~ . ~ oiust oou$nue to provida their J!tau supplomeafs , m' oae of two' ifi'ed ~ vnteni mdhods: ~ - ' _ ' , . . ~ . . . . . . , r:::::::.:•:. ~ :........::;:.:.:R;„•:..•:.w:.:::. • w:<•:+>:; ~ :.:y:.~:.:~:::::::.~: . . . . . . . .r +::s~::::::.~:.:~:::: .a::.: ~r..,.....::::: t., . . . +'.:•isi'r.i.•xv:'... ..........:.E..::.:.. r•, s. . ..s. . . . . . . ............ti:: v:: • ~ r.:::::. 4:::::: ..v.. ...v w:.::: n : n . . . v . . .1...... v:x::::: :ry..... . ..Y......:: • v:?n; :n.~........v. .............:::~:.::::::::.f•:~;::::.>:<;:::: ....a:: . . j . . . . :...:;:~:..~::::::::::::::::::._:::::~>;r:~:::.;~:.r<: ' . : v: •::::::::>:`::•>::::•:.i~:::::::::»:•::•:::::::. ~ .w... . . ~ . . ...r . ~ . ..............i............. . .......v::'.i}i+ii'iJ:S:.ii} :hi:'~ii}i::.;::.:.}v:::::::::::.~.~::::::::::.<.;{:.};::{v:.vi~: :::v ~i'• . :.~~'Mi .~N4M'... . ..n......... . . . . ~~~~............nk ?.~..~uxx~n...u.........~\n.......~. . . . . ::v..: w:: ii:..ii}i:: ti.i:i:~': {v.:''::i.iiii•.i:4i:L: i.i'::;:i:i::ii:iii::i::i: ~:i:j>•i:i}:::::i::i':i::i<L::i:•:•:::•,:i::::•,:::i:::: . BILL # SPONSOR 71TLE'. DESCRIP'TION• STATUS : _ HR 2 Saift (D-WA) • Natiooal Voter Resietrntion`Act of Requirca stalea to eatablie6 voter rogietrntion 1) HR 2 signed by Prcaident on May 20. l993 S 460 Ford D-K17 1993 ~imulteneowly with appticxtion for e driver a ~ (PL: 103 31) Y ~ , 6ceose: 2) by uniform msil.applicetion: eod;3),bY. . . . eppGcation in person. . . . . _ - " , . . S S Dodd (D-Cn' ' Femily and Medicsl Lewe Act . Requires employern to.provide up w 12 meelce.of Sigaod;by Presideat oa February 5, 1993 . ' . : ; : , . . . , impaid leeve por year for birthe, odopdooe, or':,' _ (PL:'103-3 107 Smt ~ HR 1 Ford (D-Mn . , iUneaeee of employeea or their familiea: . . _ ' ' HR 2264 Omw'b- Budget Reconcil'mtion Ad Provisiom rolated to eWdeat Ioene..Medicnid, Sipad by Preaident on Auguet 10, 1993. . of 1993 . . AFDC, md chJd well'ere - (PL 103-66) , S 414 Metienbawn Bredy ymdsuo yiokaee Requiros Ioce1 goveroment law enforcemeat - SiPed by Prcaident on November 30, 1993 (D-OH) Prevention,Act egenciea w perform crimmN bactground chxks of (P.L 103-159) . , . hwWBun Purohesets during e S-day, w'aiting period. ~ HR 1025 Schwner (D-NY) ' _ , ~ ' . • HR 1237 Schroader Nntioml C6iW prmecyion AM Requiroe'eteua w, within 3 yeare of enactment, Signad by Preaidwt on December 20, 1993 (D-OO) meet md meinmin a computerized'history file'of at (P.L. 103-209) . • . least 80% of sU identifisble cluW ebuee ceeea with aMivity in the proceding five yean:. NR 180I imse (QM/)' C.aJr 1000 -'Ed+iaat~'Awaii+a Ad To obWix fe+demi nid for rcGool unpmvement Signed by Prusidsnt ow Mareh 31, 1994 ~ S 8I6 8rnnedy atata mwe derdop sfandanfi ojanntext cnJ (P.L. 103-Z27) ` . (D-MA) • - ' ' ' "oPPon-rh' b learn ataedandr. o . . . . HR 23 8 Natchn. (QB3) APP^aPriation+ -D*wfteMtr oI- Raqwwrs sfatea 1o Pallo? aboitioni for bir Signed bY Presidene Decembsr, 1993 (P.G'~ Labor, Headt aMd Numan iNOneis woeian w aasa of nvs or biwt or to ' 103411) Services, and 8duaafioe mve Nte 6fi of ths nwthsr. . . . Mwxlates vecked in this periodical aro ealectad from fhe Netioosl Coofaronce of 3tue Logielehire'e Hsll of the State's Mmdete Monitor, the Congraeionsl Qunrterly, ..F . identitiod by Colorndo slntn depuranenta, aod from othor wwroea. MModetp which repreaenc dircct ortlen from the fedmnl government w Colotndo emte gov from thoee maodates ornment, aro given top prioriw eelection. Mundatea which comtiwro e.coodition of aid erc e!w ry, emphesizod. HMendetee c6sracterizad bY Preewptions of etate actividee and cooeunmq on'stau authoritynre giv~ ~a leeet IegiemphsluneUioen iin the eelcction procexn. Additioonl critaria ueod in the xkction pro~,•eas include the roletive level of fucat or progismmatic impect of the mandate, ond the prog'reee of We n Congress. Legislative Council 0 029 State Capitol Building 9 Denver, Colorado 80203-1784 0 303/866-3521 0 Page 11 ~ , . _ ~ . - _ _ ` = 4 ~ L . . . . . . ~ . . ~ _ . . . ^ n .4t''i ~ " . . , . : , . . - . , ~ . ' • _ x . ` , . . . SN ' _ i ..r ~ 4 . . . . . e _ ' ~ ~ ' . , ' . . . , _ ~ . • . - - ~ : i. . . - . . . ' • . . . " . 1, ~ , 4 ' . o : . _ . . . . . . ~ , - . , ' . 1k . _ .,t.....: . _ . . . ~ ~ . . , ~ . . . _ . s ~ . . . . . - . . . , . . ..t~. . . . . . . . ~ - _ . ' ~ . . , _ . ' . . ~ ' ' : . ' : ` _ ' . ' . . , ~ . . , . , ~ i . ` ' i ~ . . r ~ : . ; ~ . . . . . ' ~ ' . ' . . . . . . . ~ , . : . . _ . • . . ~ . . . ~ . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . ' . . • _ . . , . . , . . , ~ . . . . ' . y , " . . : . , . , . ~ . . . • . kL ' ~ , ' ' zj;. ..1~. , . " • . ' ' ' . ~ _ .~1 y ~i4 T.e , , ~ ' " • . . . . . . ' . . ` . - . . . . . _ . ` ~ ~ ~ . . ' . . ~ ~ i~ . . . . . . . . . a. . . . , ~ . . - . ~ ~ . . . . , - . r „ ~ Y ~ " ' ~ . . _ . . . , ~ . . . . . , ' . . , : . . ~ . . ' . •1~. - , ~ • , . ~ _ , ~f ~ y . _ j n° w z~ `~.t~tiT ~ ~ ~ ~ ? , Y ~ . ~ ~ . w 1 'r • ~.p c . ~ ~ - ~a . . ~ . . : . . ~ : _ - . . Y ` . , ~ . . , . ~ _ . . . ; . . . . . . , , : a . . ~ „ . . . _ : ~ . . i ~ . . . . ' • . . ~ . . . . _ . . : F. : . ~ , " : . . . ~ ~ . . ~ . . y' ~ ~ • . . ,y _ : . . ' . . ; , . ~ > c._ . . A . . . . . . _ . . ' r . , . ~ ' . ' . . - . . . . . : , . . ~r.a,... R. ' ' ' . , . , . . . . ~ . ~ , ~ STATE OF COLORADO LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL,'! MarATsa STATE CAPITOL .BLDG., ROOM Q29 ' t~ ~ ~ • ° ~ ; ~ 4'' ~ ~ PRyIvE.p Ie YsA ~ !M FBMETEA DENVER, COLORADO 80203-1704CO 6$46835 M.1.10300000 - . , - . . . • . . , . ~ : . . . , , . , _ . . , . =:x~:. ~ - . . . . . . . . „ LARRY GRAFEL VAIL ACTING MANAGER . ; . • 75 S FRONTAGE RD ` ~ - . . VAIL CO 81657 . • . . } ~ : , ' " : . ~ . _ . . . . _ ' ~ ' . , ' ~ . . ' . .l . . ~ . - . , . . ~ . . ^ ' . ^ . , . . ' . . . _ ~ . ' _ . . _ _ . , . , ' . ~ ' ~ ' ' r . u. ' . ' ` ' . . ' ~ - . . ' . . . . . . _ . . . . ` . ' , . . . . " . . . ~ _ . . ~ . . ~:t; . . . . - . . . . ~ ~ ' . . . ~ . , : t ' . . . . . , . . . . _ . . . . I . ~ . . , ' . . . . _ ' . - . ' . 4VAIL TOWN TOWN OF VAIL NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 13, 1994 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL Media Note: In case you missed it last week, this update will be issued on a weekly basis each Friday afternoon. Please contact us if this schedule is not convenient for your publication or public record needs. The following building permits have been issued through the Town of Vail Community Department for the period May 6-13: Hudson, 531 E. Lionshead Circle, alteration, $1,000, Bob Lazier. Taco Bell, 2171 N. Frontage Rd., alteration, $145,000, Norron Inc. Weber residence, 1675 Aspen Ridge Rd., fireplace remodel, $15,000, RC Construction. Lifthouse, 555 E. Lionshead Circle, sliding glass door replacement, $28,000, P. Etters. Hess residence, 1881 Lionsridge Loop #2, remodel, $35,000. Tayler residence, 2409 Chamonix Lane, garage, $14,000, Tara Masonry. Dayco residence, 1280 Spraddle Creek, new residence, $1.3 million, Colorado Home Improvement. Sortland residence, 1881 Lionsridge Loop #3, addition, $9,000, All Environments. Miller residence, 695 Forest Rd., remodel, $75,000, R. Boymer Construction. Pierce- Segerberg, 1000 S. Frontage Rd., remodel, $8,000, Minick Construction. Sweet Basil Restaurant, 193 Gore Creek Dr., alteration, $3,000, Boles Construction. Galione residence, 122 E. Meadow Dr., remodel, $14,000, Gordon Rowe. Maui Traders, 225 Wall St., alteration, $4,000, Mountain Tees. 6720 1 ~ ~ iy TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 ' MEMORANDUM . TO: Sybill Navas FROM: Annie Fox DATE: May 13,1994 RE: Recreation Department Relocation On May 11, the Recreation Board received information on the feasibility of relocating the Recreation offices from the lower level of the Library building to the Golf Course Clubhouse. Bob McLaurin and I sat in on the meeting. Two issues addressed in this meeting were tied to the outcome of the May 3 election. The remaining issue was a structural concern which the feasibility study addressed. Issues included: 1. Would the new board members still support relocation of the Recreation District offices? 2. Would the vote support transfer of funds from TOV to the Recreation District, thus making such a building project more likely? 3. Could the Golf Course Clubhouse structurally support a second level? ' After reviewing the engineer's report, which indicated the Clubhouse could hold a second level, the Board voted unanimously to direct staff to proceed with a building of no more than $320,000. The project has a very aggressive building plan which would move the Recreation District out of the library space by May 1995. An architect has not yet been hired nor contact made with Community Development, PEC or DRB. Considering this is a large building and much work remains, May 1995 is a very tentative date. However, a willingness to vacate the library space has been shown. Therefore, preliminary investigations on utilization should begin. RECREAZ'ION DEPARTMENT RELOCATION PAGE 2 One possible use is expanding the library public area and staff area. Many of our reference materials are moving to various forms of computer-aided retrieval. The printing of ' citations, computer bleeps, and the constant movement around the computers are not conducive to a quiet reading environment. It may make sense to contain the noise by moving Reference to the Community Room and moving the Community Room downstairs. Additionally, the 700 square feet that houses 10 employees is quite inadequate. The initial architectural plan called for a maximum of 60,000 users and hours open from 9:00 - 6:00. The library long ago exceeded these benchmarks. The Library and Community Room are 14,000 square feet; the Recreation District space is 1,535 square feet. , The library will include a preliminary plan in the 1995 budget of library-related uses for the vacated space. We will use information from the resident survey and in-house surveys (guest views are not documented by the resident survey). , Whatever the Council chooses to do with this space, funds should be set aside for predesign. Issues include: The Connmunity Room roof leaks. Repairs have been done, however, it is a 10 year old roof. • Several Recreation offices and the Community Room are on the same heating zone, and controlled by one thermostat. Heating is difficult. • The lighting and wallcoverings in the Community Room need renovation. • The Library pays all utility bills, maintains fire panels, etc. - • The Recreation Department space is not ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessible. Enclosed is the Feasibility Study presented to the Recreation District. Interestingly, the District passed a motion approving a$320,000 figure for building and more square footage than the VRD staff initially requested. The Recreation staff came to the Board with a request for $220,000 and a plan of 2,068 square feet. The Board directed staff to pursue a building plan with greater square footage. The increased square footage was unspecified. CAF/dak xc: Vail Town Council Bob McLaurin . Pam Brandmeyer T " S H E P H,ER, RESOURCESINCOR . VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT _ FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING ADMIIVISTRATIVE & EXECTUTIVE OFFICES TO EXPANDED OFFICES IN THE VAIL GOLF CLUB BUILDING May 11, 1994 f VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB . May 11, 1994 . TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ I PROJECT STATEMENT 2 II EXISTING PROGRAM DEFINITION 3 III NEW PROGRAM DEFINTTION 5 IV PROJECT COSTS g V REPORT SUMMARY 9 1 VAIL PARK & RECREATION DiSTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 I PROJECT STATEMENT The Vail Park & Recreation District (hereinafter "VRD") must relocate administrative and executive offices from the current location at 292 West Meadow Drive, beneath the Vail Public Library, and must also expand existing golf offices at the Vail Golf Club, for the following reasons: 1 overcrowded, inefficient existing office conditions; 2 desire to occupy a more user-friendly location for staff and patrons; 3 effective January 1, 1995, the VRD will begin paying $32,000 annual rent for the current space. This rent will be charged to the General Fund and will go against the Amendment 1 spending limit ceiling. This rent may be abated for 1995 if a commitment is made to vacate by May 1, 1995; 4 the majority of relocation costs will be charged to the enterprise fund, and are not subject to Amendment 1. The VRD has evaluated all apparent expansion and relocation altematives. In order to maintain its cunent high level of upper management effectiveness, to maximize taxpayer dollars for venues other than for rent and to develop a more accessible location for the clients served, expanding the Golf Club and relocating offices thereto is the proper solution. This repoR seeks to define the office relocation, including space and proximity requirements, associated costs and expansion procedures. This report also shall serve as an architectural Request for Proposal, intended to solicit and define the scope of design services required to accomplish the project. 2 VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 .II EXISTING PROGRAM DEFINITION 1.0 The VRD administrative and executive offices currently occupy approximately 1,535 square feet beneath the Vail Library, while the golf offices cunently occupy approximately 360 square feet in the golf club. This area is roughly subdivided as follows: 1.1 ADMINISTRATIVE/EXECUTIVE OFFICES, total of 904 square feet, as follows: i BUSINESS MANAGER: Brian Jones 90 SF ACCOUNTANT: Geneva Duran 65 SF ASSISTANT ACCOLJNTANT: Lynda Lee 45 SF SPECIAL EVENTS DIRECTOR: Dennis Nichols 65 SF MARKETING DIRECTOR: Susanne Chardoul 190 SF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY/RECEPTION: Jana Carvill 209 SF VRD INTERN: Kevin Kairys 65 SF EXECLTTIVE DIRECTOR: Rob Robinson 175 SF 1.2 LOGISTICAL SUPPORT, total of 307 square feet, as follows: COPY/EQUIPMENT ROOM: 98 SF RESTROOMS: 50 SF GENERAL CIRCULATION: 159 SF 1.3 CONFERENCE, total of 324 square feet. 324 SF 1.4 GOLF, total of 360 square feet. GOLF CLUB MANAGER Piet Peters 90 SF GOLF CLUB ADMIN ASSISTANT Mary Lou Armour 90 SF PGA PRO Steve Satterstrom 90 SF ASSISTANT PROS, 4 each 90 SF The majority of these spaces are undersized to function properly, and most overlap in their respective functions. 3 VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 2.0 In addition to inadequate space, these other conditions in both office locations inhibit productivity, effectiveness and confidentiality: Substandard workstation sizes and poor circulation; Inadequate sound insulation between office stations; ' Inadequate ventilation; Distant location of files from workstations; Lack of parking and distance from parking to the offices; Lack of seating for visitors, both in the general reception area and at the individual workstations and offices. 3.0 T'here is an existing conference room at the golf club building, called the "Kreuger Room", which is intended to become the primary large conference facility for the new offices. 4.0 The golf club building is presently configured with flat roofs that are in poor condition, requiring periodic snow removal in winter and occasional repair of leaks. In the course of expanding the facility for offices, it is also intended that a phased plan be implemented to create a new roof structure over the marginal flat roof areas. 5.0 The existing electrical service and panel at the golf club have been visually inspected and evaluated to determine capacity. Seventy-seven of eighty-four available circuits distribute power to the building from a 400 amp service. Unless the new offices are heated electrically, the capacity shouid adequately carry the expanded use, however, due to the presence of the kitchen, a detailed load calculation will need to be accomplished. T'he primary panel is directly beneath the area to be expanded, eliminating the need for a sub- panel. 4 . VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 III NEW PROGRAM DEFINITION 1.0 To accommodate the new offices, and expand existing golf offices, the Vail Golf Club . building would be renovated in the area of the existing golf pro and administrative offices, and expanded over the existing cart storage area. An engineering study conducted by Boyle Engineering, Inc. confirms the capability of the existing structure, with certain modifications, to support the proposed expansion. The engineering study is attached to this report. 2.0 A listing of new office requirements is attached to this report. In generating this list, each respective staff individual has been consulted, and their minimum requirements factored into these conclusions. The new offices shall account for all administrative and executive office functions, as well as for existing golf-related functions, summarized as follows: ADMIrTISTRATIVE/EXECLTTIVE OFFICES: 1,020 SF LOGISTICAL SUPPORT AREAS: 528 SF CONFERENCE: 120 SF GOLF OFFICES: 400 SF ( T O T A L: 2,068 SF 3.0 The new offices shall be designed in accordance with the following criteria: l Size and arrangement shall respond to the list of required offices, spaces and functions attached to this report. The conference facility listed is secondary to the main conference room currently located in the golf club building; ~ . 5 VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 2 Interior ceilings shall be of an acoustical grid type, at a minimum height of eight feet; e 3 All exterior partitions and roofs/ceilings shall be therma]]y insulated. All interior partitions shall be acoustically insulated; 4 Computer and communication systems shall be accommodated as required by the VRD staff; 5 Mechanical systems shall include forced-air ventilation and heating to each room or space, with equipment located in the ceiling or on the existing roof structure. VENTILATION COMMENTARY: While a forced air system is specified, other alternatives are available if costs become an issue. T'he most economical heating installation would be radiant electrical strip heat, however, operation costs would be greater. If electric radiant heat is specified, natural ventilation would be required. In this situation, natural ventilation is required at a rate of 1/20TH of the floor area served, which can be satisfied by operable windows or doors to the exterior. If inechanical ventilation is used, a rate of 15 CFM per occupant is required, of which 5 CFM must come from an exterior source. Office climate is greatly improved with mechanical ventilation rather than natural ventilation, particularly in winter when it is unlikely for natural ventilation to occur. The code does not address failure of natural ventilation during cold weather, simply requiring operable windows or doors regardless of the exterior climate. This results in poor winter office conditions with no circulation. Thus, we strongly recommend a gas-fired, forced warm air system, with continuous, low volume ventilation when heat is not required Such a system would satisfy ventilation requirements as well as provide a better environment for the building. 6 Exterior systems and finishes shall match existing; 7 Offce expansion plans shall be integrated with a phased plan to construct a new pitched-roof structure over the existing flat roof areas of the golf club building. The roof enclosing the new offices shall integrate directly with these future roof elements. 6 VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 . The new roof structure shall be designed to cover most, if not atl, of the existing flat roof areas, effectively placing existing roof equipment into an accessible, openly ventilated mechanical attic or penthouse. T'he aesthetics of this phased roof work shall be congruous with the office expansion and, while not necessarily executed in detail, design and planning for this roof work shall occur in ' conjunction with the scope of the office expansion and subjected to the design review process concurrently. 8 All building issues shall respond to the requirements of the UBC 91 code and , local ordinances. 7 VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 IV PROJECT COSTS 1.0 PREDESIGN: includes engineering study, feasibility study: $ 3,750. 2.0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: includes further detailed programming (including evaluation of existing building and new program with respect to occupancy loads, egress, toilet facilities, ADA/handicap matters, etc.), schematic design, design development, ' construction documents, bidding/negotiation phase assistance and construction administration. The selected architect shall act on behalf of the VRD to solicit bids for the work and administer the contract for construction, which shall include, but not be limited to conducting weekly progress meetings, reviewing pay applications, resolving design-related problems and issues arising during construction, processing change orders, etc. $ 17,000. 3.0 COST OF CONSTRUCTION: includes construction of new floors, walls, ceilings, roofs, mechanical and electrical systems, finishes, etc. This cost is based upon 2,068 square . feet, assembled as defined in the attached Preliminary Estimate: $ 181,680. 4.0 MISCELLANEOUS: includes tap fees, relocation expense, miscellaneous fees and contingency. $ 20,000. 5.0 PROJECT TOTAL COST: $ 222,430 8 VAIL PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY: OFFICE RELOCATION TO VAIL GOLF CLUB May 11, 1994 V REPORT SUMMARY 1.0 Relocating VRD offices to the existing Golf Club is required due to overcrowded, inadequate present conditions. If relocation does not occur, the VRD will begin on January 1, 1995, to pay annual rent of $32,000 (fixed for the next forty years) on the current space. Relocating to the Golf Club now will cost approximately $ 230,000. Based upon rent expense, the cost of relocation would be recovered in just over seven years. 2.0 Certain advantages to relocation cannot be easily expressed in dollars, but include: Organized, functional and efficient administrative offices, combined with golf administration. This is important because golf is the primary revenue source for the district. Greatly improved accessibility for staff and patrons. An eye toward the future by beginning to remedy serious existing roof problems at the Golf Club. 9 . , VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT GOLF CLUB RENOVATION NEN OFFICE AREA REOUIREMENTS REPORT DATE: 11-May-94 \9319\PROGRAM DESCRIPTION FUNCTION SIZE ROOM OR AREA - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DESK, 2 SIDE CHAIRS, 2 4-DRAWER FILES, 160 SF ROOM 4 PERSON CONFERENCE TABLE 41/CHAIRS . 2 BOOKCASES BUSINESS MANAGER DESK, 2 SIDE CHAIRS, FILES, BOOKCASES, 120 SF ROOM 1 2-DRANER FILE - MARKETING DIRECTOR DESK, COMPUTER DESK, PRINTER, 1 4-DRAWER 160 SF ROOM FILE, DRAFTING TABLE, SHELVING ACCOUNTANT DESK, 2 SIDE CHAIRS, CHECK PR[NTER, 120 SF ROOM 2 4-DRAWER FILES, STORAGE CLOSET FINANCIAL ASSISTANT DESK, 1 4-DRAWER FILE 100 SF AREA EXECUTIVE SECRETARY DESK, COMPUTER DESK, STORAGE CLOSET, 120 SF ROOM 1 4-DRAWER f ! LE SECRE7ARY/RECEPTIONIST RECEPTION COUNTER/DESK, 1 4-DRAWER FILE, 240 SF AREA SHELVING, WAITING AREA, COUCH, 3 SIDE CHAIRS COPYJEOUIPMENT RDOM COPIER, MAINFRAME COMPUTER, 2 DUMMY PC'S, 144 SF ROOM fILE SERVER, SHELVING, SMALL STANDING NORK AREA IN fRONT OF PC'S CONFERENCE ROOM TABLE, 12 CHAIR CAPACITY 120 SF ROOM KITCHEN/BREAK ROOM TABLE, 6 CHAIRS, CABINET TO HOUSE 144 SF ROOM 14ICR041AVE, COFFEE MAKER, 1JATER COOLER, REFRIGERATOR, STORAGE GOLF CLUB MANAGER DESK, 2 SIDE CHAIRS, 1 4-DRAWER FILE, 120 SF ROOM SHELVING HEAD GOLF PRO DESK, 2 SIOE CHAIRS, 1 2-DRAUER fILE 120 SF ROOM ASSISTANT GOIF PROS DESK, 2 SIDE CHAIRS 100 SF ROOM GOLF RECEPTIONIST •DESK, 2 S1DE CHAIRS, SHELVING, 100 Sf AREA 1 4-DRAWER FILE MISC & CIRCULATION 200 SF AREA - - T 0 T A L A R E A 2,068 SF ? , boyie engineering; inc. ' prof¢ssional sirucfural engin¢¢rs ~0 REC'DC"'QU ~ FILE ~ - • . Apri128, 1994 ACiION Mr. Rob Robinson • REVIEW I : Vail Recreation District 292 W. Meadow Drive ' ' Vail, Colorado 81657 - • . p ~ . . L . . . . . ,-...:(e. . :..f - . . . - r ' Subjecf: Expansion Feasibiliry SNdY , Vail Golf Course Clubhoiue ' ' - _ . • z. : - Vail, Colorndo ~ ; :r , • . - DeaCRob: ' ~ - ~ ' • _ Y: ^ h , . , . . z , , * ir .~,f . M," " " '.$s you'lmow; I have analyzed;'Yhe,existing stiucture of•the iratl2Golf-Cotrcse Clubhotise to detemune if the ' `existing flat roof areas to the north,and"east of tlietpper,leveL'offices could bewme future office space. '[Lis i',is.asummsryofmy findings I ampleased to state ihat an'addrtiqnallevel can.be createa by coqverting these bxisting.flat.roofs to floor ` ~'space~and; framing; new wa1Ls-and~ tbofsrab,bve This: a~74i,hpri;;c6 uld be constructed with only_+or ' nuodifications w the extisting'shucbue belov{: ;The F.zpansion Feas~iliry, plan 5v`hichws~barf~if.~hs jcC~iPrtSUeSCn'besythe existing shucture and notes ttie areas - _.'-'thafmay iequire~&aming modifications ~ESSentially, We•,intent of+Uie,sh'vchue for an'addition should be ro_ , _ stack`tiew bearing loads over, the Cart Barn north and gouth beai~ng }va71s and the steel'pipe columns in the ' • . . . ~*.Cart Storage area. I have dete ine md=thatthe founda~ion"wa(Ls;and footings aze'ad`e,quate to support an addidonal level of loading tbmughouTthe i6commended'area. tlew building loads should be distributed into - ' the interior bearing wall between the original Cart Barn.and~the Cart.Storage azea as weJl as the existing row of . columns that parallels this wall to iniure that the footings uuder ihese two elements aze oot over s7essed. . ' The,pipe colunms have the capacity to suFport the additional loading. 1'he framed bearing wall may require new headers and/or addidonal studs. The steel beam over the pipe columns will require steel reinforcing if it • receives additional line loading. However, if the roof loads are concentrated over the column locations, the existing beam will be adequate. Similazly, ihe 2x4 bearing wall on the north side of the Cart Barn may require more studs to strengthen it. T6e spuies of the existing studs should be determined during the remodel process to see if any additional material . will be required. The existing roof framiug over the entire envelope described on Shee[ 1 will be capable of supporting llte new office floors. Furthermore, these systems have the capacity to acwmmoda[e [he additional dead load of over &aming that may be requircd to create a level surFace Uuoughout the addition. Obviously, this horizontal framing will require new trausfer beams if the roof framing imposes any point or line loads on ' iL As noted above, new reacdons from the roof frarning should be stacked over the recommended existing walls and columns below. 143 e. meadaw dr., suite 390 0 aossroads sFmpping center o vail, colwodo 81657 0 30.3/476 21 70 Mr. Rob Robinson ' Apri128, 1994 , Page - 2 This completes my analysis of the structure at this time. Sheet 1 should be •fairly self-explanatory, and should graphically provide the Architect with the informarion he needs to complete his portion of the Feasibility Study. I would be very interested in providing the Structural Engineering for this addition when and if you decide to proceed with the program. Please feel free to give me a call if you have any questions regarding this report, or if you have any further need of my services. ` Sincerely yours, BOYLE EN G, INC. Timothy M. oyle President TMB/dn . _ ~ - , r VRD GOLF CLUB EXPANSION PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE: COST OF CONSTRUCTION REPORT DATE: 11-May-94 \9319\ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION OUANT RATE SUBTOTAL . GENERAL REOUIREMENTS 1.00 LOT 25,000.00 $25,000 DEMOLITION/REFUSE REMOVAL 1 LOT 15,000.00 $15,000 CUT & PATCH 1 LOT 7,000.00 $7,000 FRAMING 2,068 SF 20.00 541,360 ' STUCCO 1,000 SF 4.50 $4,500 UINDOWS/EXTERIOR TRIM 1 LOT 8,000.00 $8,000 ROOFING/FLASHING 34 SQ 375.00 $12,750 ~ INSULAT'ION 1 LOT 2,000.00 $2,000 SHEETROCK 6,204 SF 1.60 $9,926 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS 2,068 SF 3.25 $6,721 DOORS & HARDWARE 18 EA 300.00 $5,400 PAINTING 6,204 Sf 0.75 $4,653 CARPET 254 SY 18.00 $4,564 TR1M/CASEUORK 1 LOT 8,000.00 $8,000 SIGNAGE 1 LOT 500.00 $500 MECHANICAL 1 LOT 7,000.00 $7,000 ELECTRICAL/DATA/COMMUNICATIONS 2,068 SF 4.50 $9,306 CONTINGENCY 1 LOT 10,000.00 $10,000 T 0 T A L $181,680 ' COST PER SOUARE FOOT 2068 SF $87.85 , I B . , • • 4 Summer • June 18 ; Ke~fy Eiur~t < J'une 25.:..Your.:fathe~s: 40 ; Mustache June 29;: Nelsqn ~tangel3 .Jufy 2 : Bwavo~ Coloracfo Juty 9 ~ Poar Boys ` J ado ~ uf~ Brauot Color Juty 13 : Wayne To~is :l.uty i a Brava~ Co!Grado Jufy 16 ~Aas~key Sirei? Juty 19 ; Brav~iF Col Jufy 20, ; Beatiisole~~ • JutY 2V;: Bravo}Calcrada `i Jufy 23 : Images Jury 25 ; Bravo~ Ce'ierad~ Jufy 26 ' Bravq~Cabrado > .1uly 27 .Asleep af ne iNheel:: .J uty 30 Laugh~r~ ~iands <Aug 2;,,; Bravot Co ~ra~v , Aug '3 ' Daviii fr~ , Mn ' Aug 6 . King Da~ ;Js 1A1K3 ~ef?i~ ; Aug 1 3 Hazel ; ;Aug i T: Lov~en ar~ Navatm Aug 20;: 1r~ ~anbbean ,fa~ ~ `Aug 24; Titd 6~~ed~aclciys 27:;~:':botseta<::::> , , ;Aug.<31:<:::::> ;Sep, 3,,~.:,4;patt.;Jut~xes::.»::::> Sep T : TBA ; ; ` Sep i 0;: FAtind Machtrie . 0.levelaiid. Trta,;;;' Sep 24 New<Suc..iirutt~dge »:::Jazz:: <»:«:;'<:::>::>:::<?'<:: ~ RECEIVED MAY 1 6 1994 LVER3'NORHE C O L O R A D O 601 Center Circle • P. O. Box 1309 • Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 April 25, 1994 Neighboring Cities, Towns and Counties, The Town of Silverthorne has recently reduced our funding for the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments to a$500 contribution for the "Area Agency on Aging." The decision not to fund the remaining programs was based on several factors. We feel it is important for other members of NWCCOG to be awaze of our actions and understand the issues from our view. In a very brief summary the decision was based on three issues: * Water Policy - In some cases the position taken by NWCCOG did not agree with Town approved policy or actions. * Value of Services - The value of services provided by NWCCOG staff to our Community Development and Public Works staff was minimal. * Water issues funded by the To,"n - The ToNvn agrees wiih many of the programs addressed by NWCCOG but did not feel that it was appropriate for the municipalities to fund these progranis. The Town is sharing this inforniation with other participants to clarify our position. It is not our intention to evaluate how NWCCOG provides services to your organization but to let you know what we are doing. If you have any questions, please contact Tom Long or Dallas Everhart at 468-9612. Sincer , J~ Dallas D. Everhart Tom Long ~ Town Manager Mayor ~ General Government 468-9612 Fax 468-8094 Public Safety 468-5892 Community Development 468-9649 Public Works 468-0353 Recreation & Culture 468-0711 TOWN OF VAIL MEMOR.ANDUM T0: Robert McLaurin Council Members FROM: Judy Popeck DATE: May 17, 1994 RE: Investment Report ' Enclosed is the investment report with balances_ as of April 30, 1994. On April 15th, a FNMA matured for $160, 000 and was used for the monthly payment for the police'construction. Also, a$1;000,000 FHLB matured on April 19th and a$1,500,000 FFC matured on April 21st. Both of these were used to purchase a$2,500,000 FHLM on April 27th with a yield of 3.734%. The estimated average yield for the debt service fund was 3.01% and 4.25% for the pooled cash fund. Currently the yield curve for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year are 4.11$, 4.69%, and 5.16% respectively. Please call me if you have any questions. • Town of Vail, Colorado Investment Report Summary of Accounts and Investments For the Month Ending April 30, 1994 Balances Percentage 04/30i94 of Total . Money Market Accounts (see page 1) - Commercial Banks $23,619 0.12% Money Market and Mutual Funds $5,041,365 24.82% Colorado Investment Poois $3,960,115 19.50% Total $9,025,099 44.44% Commercial Savings Banks & Loans Certificates of Deposit (see page 2) Eagle County Institutions 0.00% Other Colorado Institutions $297,000 $297,000 1.46% National Institutions , 0.00% Total $297,000 $297,000 1.46% Percentage of Portfolio in Savings & Loans 0.00% U.S. Government Securities (see page 3) Treasury Notes & Bills $1,283,836 6.32% GNMA's $88,883 0.44°l0 U.S. Savings Bonds $25,371 0.12% Federal Agency Discourrt Notes 8 Bonds , $9,587,938 47.21 % Total $10,986,028 54.09% Total Portfolio $20,308,127 100.00% Maturing Within 12 Months $18,572,729 91.45% Maturing Within 24 Months $622,065 3.06% ' Maturing After 24 Months $1,113,333 5.47% , $20,308,127 100.00% 5/13/94j1p invsm4 Money Market Accounts as oi April 30; 1994 . -For the Month of April- Institution Balances Type of Accounts High Low Average 04/30/94 CON4NERCIAL BANK ACCOUNTS ~ First Bank of Vail - Operating Interest 3.190% 2.730% 2.890% $645 Balance $2,625,776 $146,941 $759,757 First Bank of Vail - Insurance Interest 3.190% 2.730% 2.8909'0 $1,033 Balance Colorado National Bank Super Now Account Interest 2.330% General Operating Account Balance $21,941 Totai Commercial Bank Accounts $23,619 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS ~ Colorado Trust Housing Bond Proceeds - Interest 3.270% Balance $868,971 CSAFE - Bond Proceeds - Police Construction Interest 3.340% Balance $236,258 CSAFE Interest 3.340% Balance $2,854,886 Total Local Government Invesiment Pools Accounis $3,960,115 MONEY MARKET FUNDS First American Corp. Trust Treasury Fund Bond Reserve Interest 2 976% Balance , $1,353,699 Fidelity Investment Government Money Market Accounts Interest 3.170% Bond Issue Reserve Account " Balance $275,110 Interest 3.500% Operating Account Balance $2,347,933 Overland Express Balance $1,064,623 Total Money Market and Mutual Funds ~ ^$5,041,365 Total all accounis $9,025,099 "Account Subject to Arbitrage Rebate 5/13/94j1p invmm4 Page 1 . Certificates of Deposit > as of April 30, 1994 Bank Name, Location Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value . BestBank, Thornton Colorado FDIC 4.750% 4.600% 16-Feb-93 13-Feb-95 289 $99,000 Paonia-State Bank, Paonia Colorado FDIC 4.400% 4.250% 17-Aug-93 15-Feb-95 291 $99,000 Bank of Greeley, Greeley Colorado FDIC 4.250% 4.000% 16-Jun-93 16-Jun-94 47 $99,000 Avg Yield 4.283% $297,000 invcd4 5/13/94j1p Page 2 a 7 Govemment 'Securities as of April 30, 1994 "'Treasury Notes & Bills"' Days to Days Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity to Book Par Type Fund Coupon _ Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value TNote Pooled 4.250°,6 4.340% 17-May-93 15-May-96 1094 746 $499,079 $500,000 TBill Bond Proceeds 3.360% 25-Oct-93 22-Sep-94 332 145 $101,663 $103,000 TBill Bond Proceeds 3.390% 25-Oct-93 240ct-94 364 177 $61,029 $62,000 Zero Pooled 7.820°k 21-Jun-91 15-Nov-95 1608 564 $622,065 $700,000 AverageYield 5.90°k • $1,293,836 $1,365,000 Average Days to Maturity 408 "`GNMA'S"' ~ Years to Estimated Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Principal Pool Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding 5803 8.000% 8.480% ~ 14Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 16.00 $27,423 13003 8.000°k 9.500% 24-Oct-86 15-Oct-06 20.20 17.00 $28,162 14659 8.000% 9.200°k 24-Oct-86 15-Jan-07 2120 18.00 $33,298 Avg Yield 9.073% - $88,883 "'U.S. Savings Bonds"' Years to Issue Maturity Maturity Years to Book Maturity Series Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value EE 7.170% 01-Oct-86 01-Oct-96 10.00~ 2.42 $25,371 $30,000 "'Federal Agency Discount Notes & Bonds"' Days to Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Book Maturity Agency Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value FFC Pooled 3.560% 3.641% 07-Jun-93 ^ 01-Jun-94 ~35932 $499,966 $500,000 FNMA Bond Proceed 3.2309 25-Oct-93 09-May-94 196 9 $254,819 $255,000 FNMA Bond Proceed 3.260% 25-Oct-93 06-Jun-94 224 37 $224,280 $225,000 FNMA Pooled 3.582% 01-Mar-94 28-Jun-94 119 59 $497,170 $500,000 FFC Bond Proceed 3.320% 25-Oct-93 18-Ju1-94 266 79 $387,259 $390,000 FDMC Pooled 3.992% 01-Mar-94 28-Nov-94 272 212 $488,772 $500,000 FHLB Pooled 3.551% 18-Mar-94 17-May-94 60 17 $998,446 $1,000,000 FHLB Pooled 3.614% 30-Mar-94 31-May-94 62 31 $2,991,115 $3,000,000 FHLB Bond Proceed 3.361% 25-Oct-93 15-Aug-94 294 107 $252,523 $255,000 FHLM Pooled 3.734% 27-Apr-94 27-May-94 30 27 $2,493,588 $2,500,000 FHLM Pooled 4.560% 4.560% 03-Jun-93 03-Jun-96 1096 765 $500,000 $500,000 $9,587,938 N $9,625,000 Average Yield 3.67% Average Days to Maturity 125 Total $10,986,028 5/13/94jtp invtr4 Page 3 WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1993 10119 SNOW STORAGE LAND LARRY/BOB McL: Immediately pursue purchase from VA Initial discussion between TOV and VA re: possible future land exchanges PURCHASE of current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres have occurred. adjacent to the west. 1994 02/08 MANOR VAIL SIDEWALK BOB McULARRY: Investigate blind corner. Bob McL has viewed area of concern. Right-of-ways will be identified to (request: Johnston) see if there is room within the right-of-ways for a sidewalk. Greg Hall will have aerial photography of the area for review at 4126194 Work Session. 02115 CHUCK ANDERSON YOUTH PAM/MERV: Contact VRD about moving up the selection Packet received and included in Paul's and Jan's materials, 513194. AWARD process to allow awards to be given during May PRIOR to (request: Strauch) graduation or to be included with the graduation ceremonies. 03/01 VRD LEASE EXPIRATION AT ANNIE: Research lease to explore possibilities of space Bob McL and Annie Fox met with VRD Board on 5111194. They are LIBRARY use, working toward constructing a new building but do not have a definite (request: Navas) , timeline. 03/08 SAGE RE-PLANTING ON HILLSIDES TODD 0.: Research remediation and cost to re-seed both Todd is working with Marty Jones to come up with site-specific costs. (POTATO PATCH and BOOTH areas and present to Council at earliest opportunity. (3110/94) Marty is satisfied with replanting at Booth Falls. Continuing to FALLS) pursue other hiliside cut replantings. 03108 UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES LARRY; Create a Master Plan to phase the undergrounding Larry has memo in process. MASTER PLAN of all above-ground utilities within Vail. (request: Council) 03/08 NIGHT LIGHTING/NIGHT TOUR LARRY: It would appear our night lighting in the Will schedule for an Evening Meeting as soon as agendas will allow. (request: Strauch) CrossroadslVTRC/Covered Bridge area could use some TOV, in the past, budgeted $30,000 for adding lights to bus stops, street enhancement. What is the street lighting program currently intersections, and bridges for safety. Starting in 1994, the budgeted geared toward? amount was increased to $50,000 to address both safety concerns and those areas addressed in the Village Streetscape Plan, COUNCIUSTAFF: In the near future, we will try to schedule an evening "tour" to look at the ambience created Re: Christmas lighting at VTRC; Lighting addition depends on a and safety issues inherent in our "core" community. prioritization of funding. This could be a part of the night tour? May 13, 1994 Page 1 of 2 03/15 PRIVATE PARKING TOWING KEN: Investigate the use of Denver Boots or town tow Ken has spoken with Tom and will have a memo for packets. (request: Steinberg) trucks as alternatives to illegal parking on private property. 3/22 BEARSIGARBAGE RUSSELLIPAUL: The issue of bears attacking unsecured Russell met with BFI and DOW on 5/9194. They discussed doing a cost (request: Johnston) food has still not been resolved. What proactive stance can share program (properry owner i/a, BFI 1/a, DOW Ya, TOV Ya). BFI is we take to keep this dangerous situation from occurring? checking to make sure DOW still has funds. Another meeting has been scheduled for Friday, 5/20194. Note; 300 bear incidents in Vail last year. Note: DOW has new policy (one strike, you're out) where they will shoot any bear that is a threat. Bill does not like this. 04105 SIGNS LARRYIGREG: Why are there so many signs in this town? Bob McL will meet with Tom Moorhead, Ken Hughey, and Buck Allen in They represent neither a quality appearance nor are they May to determine how to resolve this issue. "use r-f ri endly. " There are 24 signs between Tom Steinberg's house and the TOV... 04/05 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS BOB McL: Coordinate with Jack Lewis, Bob McL met with Jack and is trying to set something up. 05/03 LIBRARY SIGN AND EXTERIOR ANNIE F.: What's the schedule for maintenance of painting PAINTING and repair? What happened to the Vail sign? (request: Strauch) 05110 SUN VAIL T-111 (request: Navas) May 13, 1994 Page 2 of 2