HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-06-07 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOUVN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION.
TUEJDd9 ll y 69UA\E C y II e79°U
u •00 P.M. IN TOtl COUNCIL Ctl-0i'9MBERa7
d°9GGElDA
1. Site Visit: Bald ANountain Road area.
2. Ten Year Employee Recognition:
~ Joseph P. Chesman, Police Sergeant.
3. Preserrtation Re: Senate Bill 94-216 conceming certain requirements for the development of large
planned communities under the "Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act" (CCIOA).
4• Update Re: TOV Environmentat Strategic Plan.
5. Discussion Re: Options concerning bear proof garbage containers.
6. DRB Report.
7. Information Update.
8. Council Reports.
9• Other.
10. Executive Session: Personnel Matters.
11. Adjournment.
NOTE U1PCOflAING MEET9NG ST'A,RT TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
(D * * 0 0 * *
g~~ NEXT NA9L TOWN COUNCIL RECflJLAR 1NOFi1C SESS90PE
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/94/94, BEGIPINING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAIUIBERS.
THE FOLLO!!1/BN~'a VA9L TOWN COUNCIL REGULe4Fa VVORK SESSION
1AlBLL BE 6aN TUESDR,V, 6/21/94, BEGI6VNIPIG AT 2:00 P.M. IN TpV COUNCIL CHAAABERS.
YHE FOLLOWBNG bAVL TOWN COUNCIL FiEGIyLAR EVEBVING NIEET9NG
W0LL BE ON TUESDAV, 6/21/94, BEGIfVNI1VG AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAnABERS.
(D ~ ~ ~ • • ~
C:WGENDA.WS
_
VAIL TOUVIV COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 7, 1994
9:00 P.M. [IIV TO!/ COflJNCBL CFIe4NIBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
i:QO P.M. 1. Site Visit: Bald Mountain Road area.
George Ruther
Action Requested of Council: Review site in preparation for first reading of
Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1994, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section
18.69.050 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures
for measuring slope of a proposed development site and permitting retaining walls
six feet in height in the front setback when associated with a permitted garage.
Applicant: Town of Vail.
Backqround Rationale: Please see attached PEC memo dated May 23, 1994. The
; PEC voted 7-0 in favor of the request to amend Section 18.69.050.
1:30 P.M. 2. Ten Year Employee recognition:
Ken Hughey * Joseph P. Chesman, Police Sergeant.
1:40 P.M. 3. Presentation re: Senate Bill 94 - 216 concerning certain requirements for the
Ed O'Brien development of large planned communities under the "Colorado Common Interest
Ownership Act" (CCIOA).
Action Requested of Council: Listen to presentation of Vail Associates regarding
substantive issues addressed by amendment. Please see attached memo dated
June 2, 1994, from Tom Moorhead including additional information.
Backqround Rationale: Council requested Governor Romer by letter to veto
Senate Bill 94 -216 because of lack of information and discussion by legislature
on this amendment. VA has requested the opportunity to provide Council with
background information.
2:40 P.M. 4. Update re: TOV Environmental Strategic Plan.
Russ Forrest
Action Reauested of Council: Review vision statement and goal areas.
Backqround Rationale: On June 2, 1994, staff presented the draft Environmental
Strategic Plan to the public. Comments from this meeting wrill be incorporated into
the plan. Staff would also like to provide an opportunity for Council to review the
draft plan so that their comments can be incorporated early in the planning
process. Staff hopes to bring the plan to Council for final approval by the end of
July, 1994.
3:10 P.M. 5. Discussion re: Options concerning bear proof garbage containers.
Russ Forrest
Bill Andre Action Requested of Council: Please review enclosed memo on bear proof
garbage containers and determine which options Council uvould like to pursue.
Backqround Rationale: In 1993, there were over 300 reports to the Department of
Wildlife and Vail Police Department of Black bears in the Town of Vail. Many of
the complaints received by the Department of UVildlife result from bears tipping
over garbage cans at residences throughout the Town. The most sign'rficant
problem area is the Intermountain neighborhood in West Vail.
Staff Recommendation Select one or more afternatives to address this issue.
1
~
3:55 P.M. 6. DRB Report.
Jim Curnutte
7. Information Update.
8. Council Reports.
9. Other.
4:30 P.M. 10. Executive Session: Personnel Matters.
5:()0 P.M. 11. Adjournment.
N0TE UPCONdENC MEEI'ING START TInAES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEkT VAoL T01NN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
!fl/ILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/94/94, BEGINIVING AT 2:00 P.M. 9N TOV COUNCIL CIiANABERS.
THE FOLLOW9RNG VA9L T0WN COUNCIL REG9JLAFd WORK SESSYOM
lR/ILL BE ON TUESDAV, 6/21/94, BEGINNlING AT 2:00 P.M. VN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
4HE FOLLOlNIR9G VA9L T01AIN COUNCIL REGULAR EVEIVING iViEETIPIG
WOLL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/21/94, BEGINIdIPlG AT 2:00 P.M. 9N TOV COUNCIL CHAAABERS.
~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~
C:\AGEIV DA.VVSE
2 .
~ .
MEflAORANDl9RA
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: May 23, 1994
SUBJECT: A request for an amendment to Section 18.69.050 of the Town of Vail Municipal
Code to clarify how slope is to be measured and to allow for 6 foot walls to be
constructed in the front setback for projects where the average slope of the site
beneath the proposed structure and parking area is in excess of 30%.
Applicant: Town of Vail '
Planner: George Ruther
INTROD9.DCT@ON
Section 18.69.050 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code allows garages to be located in the
front setback when the average slope of the site beneath the proposed structure and parking
area exceeds 30%. This section applies to four zone districts: Single Family, Two Family,
Primary/Secondary, and Hillside Residential. Since development on sites with slopes in
excess.of 30% often require retaining walls to stabilize cut slopes, and since garages are
permitted in the front setback when in accordance with Section 18.69.050, staff feels Section
18.69.050 should be amended to allow 6-foot tall retaining walls in the front setback under
these circumstances. According to existing zoning regulations, Section 18.58.010 allows walls
up to a maximum of 3 feet in height in the required front setback regardless of slope
conditions.
Staff also feels that an amendment should be made to this section as it relates to how slope
is measured at a proposed development site. Currently, slope on a site is only calculated for
the area under the proposed structure and the code does not address whether to take into
account the slope under any existin structures on the site.
uo. PROPosED cHANGEs
The proposed additions are shown below in the shaded text. The proposed deletions are
shown in overstrike.
18.69.050 Special restrictions for developments on lots where the average
slope of fhe site beneath all existing:';'or proposed structures and
par9cing areas are in excess of th6rty percent in the Fiillside
Residenfial, Single-Family Residential, Two-Eamily Residential, and
Primary/Secondary Residential zones.
1
The following additional special restrictions or requirements shall apply to development
on any lot in a Hillside Residential, Single-Family Residential, Two-Family Residential
or Primary/Secondary Residential zone district where the average slope of the site
beneath the proposed structure and.parking area is in excess of thirty percent:
A. A soil and foundation investigation, prepared by and bearing the seal of a
registered professional engineer shall be required.
B. Foundations must be designated and bear the seal of a registered, professional
engineer.
C. A topographic survey prepared by a registered surveyor, with contour intervals
of not more than two feet, shall be required.
D. Structures must be designed by a licensed architect.
E. Site coverage as it pertains to this chapter, as permitted by Sections 18~49090"
18.10.110, 18.12.110 and 18.13.090, is amended as follows: IVot more than
fifteen percent of the site area may be covered by buildings; and not more than
ten percent of the total site area may be covered by driveways and surface
parking.
F. A site grading and drainage plan shall be required.
G. A detailed plan of retaining walls or cuts and fills in excess of five feet shall be
required.
H. A detailed revegetation plan must be submitted.
1. The zoning administrator may require an environmental impact report as
provided in Section 18.56.020.
J. A minimum of one covered parking space shall be provided for each dwelling
unit.
K. Setbacks, as they apply to this chapter, as required by Sections 18.09.060,
18.10.060, 18.12.060, and 18.13.060, are amended as follows: There shall be
no required front setback for. garages, except as may be required by the Design
Review Board.
L; Reta~Ring walls shal[<:r~ot exceed' 6 feet'in hei.ght in the required f.ront setbac[~1j
VGV. STAFF RECOMMENDAT90N
Development on steep slopes (greater than 30%) inherently implies site disturbance and the
need for retaining walls. Often times, the steep cuts that are made in the front setback for
garage construction as permitted by Section 18.69.050 require the installation of retaining
walls in excess of 3 feet in height. Under existing conditions, a garage is permitted in the
front setback, yet a wall of sufficient height needed to retain any associated cuts requires a
wall height variance from the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC), thus creating a
contradiction in the Code. Staff feels the proposed amendments to Section 18.69.050
allowing 6 foot tall retaining walls in the front setback pursuant to Section 18.69.050, and
calculating slope under existina structures, will alleviate any contradiction without jeopardizing
the intent of the Code.
c:\pec\mem0s\sl0pe.523
2
r
~
MEMORANDUM
'Il'O: Van? Towun Coanneflll
lF'][t: 'd'ouan Moorhea¢Il, 'd'own Attoruaey
DA: Jaarae 2, 4994
RE: Senate Bal9 94-2Il6
Attaehed 'ns acopy of t9ne corre§pondence dated May 24, 1994, from Niayor Peggy Osterfoss Qo
Governor Romer requestnng that he veto Senate Bill 94-216. Subsequently, Ed 09DTIeIIy Vaad
Assoeiates Rea? Estage, provnded signiacant soaarce gnater6al so that the Towae Council can eva?uate
the substance of the amendaflaent to the "Coloa-ado CmYanxaion Interest Ownershep Act" (CCIOA).
Attaehed are tlne fol?owiang docunments:
0 Unprooffed A¢leanee, Unofficaal Copy off Senate Bill 94-216
0 Posntgoae memoranduaan from Coloruclo S&a Couretry USA
0 Mednorandum to Andy dDa?y from Ed O9A?rleny VA Real Estate, and Kevin
Counvvic9c, Attorney at Law 0 Memorandaaaua to Rick MacCutcheon and lEd O'Breen from G. Keefn
Cmnwnc8c, Agtoraaey at ILaw
° Cou'respondence datecfl May 17, 1994, to Governor gtoaner from Maa-Ec
O9ReHddyy Seneor Vfee President, M6ssion Viejo Comparay
° Correspondence to Governor HSouner from Edward D. O'Brien, Vuse
PreseaIleng and Claeef Fnnanceal Ot~iser, V$ll ASSOC1ateS R~al EStatC
0 Correspondence to Baad Gates, Coaanty Conaaa-dssioner, from Andy Da?y,
President, Vael Associates
Iff aYIIy addfl$90EHaB 9 OIPII6&'H$ll0i11 HS ll'eqfl&eSted OH' nQCeSSarys ple$SE dO H?0$ flLeSl$aQe $O COR$aC$ Ei1e.
ThaEDk3.
C:lSB94216.MEM
r
~
~
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 ~O,~ce of.the May~~r
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157 Pos4-14TM' brand fax transmittal memo 7671 #of pages c, /
Yo From
/~oNoR C~ Qb /e PfG~ d57~iPLoS
May 25, 1994 C~ ~-,c Aj o c~. ro v
Oept. Phone #
V74- .7/ v~
The Honorable Roy Romer Fax # 86 . v o 3 Fax # y 7 s_ •
Governor
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax Post-It'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 #of pages 9,/
Denver, Colorado 80203 va ~.,m
A/v4 j' ~JAL Pf66-1 o3>f~;,SS
co. vg co. Td v
RE: Senate Bill 94-216 Dept. Phone # y, 9--;?/
Fax#y~9_aos3 Fax# Y79
Dear Governor Romer:
In response to your request for input, the Vail Town Council requests that you veto Senate
Bill 94-216.
As presented at this time, we do not believe that there has been an opportunity for the
necessary public discussion and examination to take place. This Bill was presented at the
very end of the legislative session and was adopted by the House and the Senate in a manner
that leaves questions as to whether this provision serves the public good or is a grant of
special privilege. It appears appropriate under the circumstances that the Bill be presented
agai.n at the be•nning of the legislative session next year so that the necessary open and
frank discussion consistent with the legislative process can take place.
Thank you for the opportunity to present the view of the Town Council. I am sure you will
give this matter due deliberation.
Ver truly yours,
Peggy Osterfoss
1Vlayor
1VIA0/dd
r MRY-23-1954 15:09 OSPB 303 866 3044 P.006/006
1994'
.
UNPROOFED ADVANCE
UNOFFICIAL COPY
,
SEfVATE 8Il.L 94-216 BY SENATORS Wattenberg, Mutzebaugh, and Schroeder;
also REPRESENTATIVE lVilliams.
. i
CONCERNING CERTA%N REQUIREMENTS FOR -THE DEVELOPMENT QF LARGE PI.ANNED COMMUNITIES UNDER YHE 'COLORADQ COMMOfd YN7EREST
OWNERSHIP ACT". Be it enacted by the General Assernbly of the State ef Co7orado:
SECT%OGd 1. 3$d33.3-108, Coiorado Revised Statutes, 1982
Repl. Vol., as amendedy is amended BY TNE ADDITIOfd 0F A NEW SUBSECTION to read: -
38-33.3-103. Deflnftions. Rs used in the declaration and
bylaws of an associatipn, unTess specifitally provided otherwise
or un7ess the context otherwise requires, and in this articie: PLANNED THAT MEETS5THE" RRTERIA SET ORTH Ild SfECTYON 38P33N3ED16~3 (I) YSECTION 2. Article 33.3 of title 38, Golvrado Revised
Statutes, 1982 Repl. Vol., as amended, is amended BY Tl1E ADDITION
OF A PlfW SECTIDN to read: -
38-33.3-116.3. Large planned cemmunities -exemption from
• certajn rgqui rements. (1) APlY PARCEL OF LAND SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM
THE PROVISIONS OF TNIS ARTICLE AS SPECIFiED IN SUQSECTION (3) OF
THIS SECTION 4R AS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED IN ANY PROVISTON 0F THCS
ARTICLE, If:
(d) 1T CONSISTS OF AT LEAST:'TWO FiUNDREO ACRES; (
(b) IT IS ZONED FOR DEVELOPMEN7 OF AT LEAS1' TWO NUNDRED
r
Capltal 1-ifters indicate new material added to existing statutes;
dashes through words indicate deletions from existing statutes and
such material not part of act. -
TOTAL P.006
I
, I
r
G
~ . ~
~
. . . . . , I
RESID£NCES ANq A7 LEA57 TWENTY THOUSAidD SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL
' USE AT THE TYME OF RECORDING;IHE AFFIDAYIT_REQUaREO PURSUAMT TO
SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS.SECTION; ANU:
(c) IT MEETS TNE OEFINITION OF A PLANNED COMP9UMITY PURSUAPIT
T0 SECTION 38-93.3-103 ,(22)e, _ •
, .(2) FOR A1V EXEMPTYOP! AUTNORIZED IPd SUSSEC7ION (I) OF THIS
SECTION TO APPLY, THE PROPERTV P1UST gE ZONED WITHIN EACH COUNTY ' •
IPd WHICH ANY PART OF SUCH PARCEL IS LOCATED, AND THE OWNER QF THE
PAftCEL 5HALL RECORD WITH TWE COUNTY CLERK ANO RECORDER 0F EACH COUNTY IN WNICH ANY PART OF SUCH pARGEI %S LOCATED AN AFFIDAVIT
SETTING FORTH THE FOLLOWING: '
(a) THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUCH PARCEL OF LAND;
(b) A STATEhfENT THAT THE pARTY SIGNING THE AFFYDAVIT IS THE
OWNER OF THE PARCEL Ifd ITS ENTIRETY IN fEE SIMPIf, EXCLUOING '
MINERAL IidTERE5TS; '
(C) TNE ACREAGE OF THE PARCEL; •
(d) THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 7HE PARCEL, WITH A
CERTIFIED COPY OF ARPLICABLE~ZONING REGULATIONS A7TACEiEB; AND
(e) A STATEMENT THAT-NEITHER THE 04IPlER PlOR ANY OFFICER, DIREC70R, SHAREHOLDER, PARTPIER, OR OTHER ENTItY NAVING P'ORE THAN A TEN-PERCENT EQUTTY INTEREST.IN THE OWN£R HAS BEEN CO(dUICTED OF
A FELbNY WITHIN THE LAS1' TEN YEARS. .
(3) A LARGE pLANNED COMMUNITY FOR WHICN AN AFFIDAVIT HAS
BEEN FILEb PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE
€XEMPT FROPN THE FOLLOW[NG PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE:
, (a) SECTION 38-33.3-205 (I) (e) 7HROUGH.,.(1) (m); (b) SECTION 3$-33.3-207,-13);.....___.
- ~ (c) SECTION 38-33.3-208;
(d) SECTION 38-33.3-209 (2) (b), (Z) (c), (2} (d), (2) (f),
(2) (9)9 (4), ANQ (6);
(e) SECTION 38-33.3-210; '
'(f) SECTION 38-33.3-212;
(g) SECTION 38-33e3-213;
(h) SECTION 39-33.3-215;
(i) SECTION 38-33.3-217 (I);
PAGf 2-SEidATE BTtL 94-216 i
909i200°d bb02 998 20£ SdSO LO:ST b66T-22-AtiW
riH'r'-23-15y4 15;08 OSPB 303 866 3044 P.005i006
~
-
(j) SECTION 38-33.3-344.
(4) SECTION 38-33.3417 (4) SHAL! 6E APPLICABLE AS FOLaOWS: FJ(CEP7 TO THE EXTEiVT EXPRESSLY PERMITfED aR REQUIRED BY OTHER
• PROlIISIOA[S OF THYS ARTICLE, NO ANlENDMEIdT MAY CRF.ATE OR INCREASE
" SPECIAL DECLARANT RIGHTS, INCREASE THE PdUMSER OF UNITS OR THE
ALLOCATED YNTERES75 OF A UPdIT, OR THE USES TO WHICH ANY UNIT IS
RESTRICTFD, IN THE ABSEPICE 0F UNANIMOUS CONSEPlT OF THE l1NIT
06dNERS. ' . .
(5) THE EXEMPTIQN AUTNORTZED BY THIS SEGTION SHALL CON7INUE FOR THE WHOLE 0F THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTiON (2) OF THIS
SECTIOfd SO LONG AS THE OWNER SIGNING THE AFFiRAVIT IS THE OWNER
OF ALL 0F SAID PARCEL. UPON THE SALE, CUNYEYANCEfl OR OTHER
TRANSFER OF ANY PART OF SUCH PARCEL, THE PQRTIQN SOLD, CONVEYEQ,
OR 7RAPISFERREb SHA'LL BECOME St16JfCT TO ALL THE PROVISIONS QF THIS
ARTICI.E, BUT ANY SUCH POR7ION SHALL REMAIN SUBJECT TO ANY RECORDED
DEGLARA7CON5 E5TABLISNEp pRIOR 7Q THE SALE, CONVEYANCE, OR
TRANSFER.
i(b) 7H€ ASSOCIATION ESTABLISHED FOR A LARGE PLANNED
COMMUNITY SHALL OPERATE WITH RESPECT TO LARGE PLANNEb .
COMMUNITY-WIDE MATIERS AND SHALl. NOT OTHERWISE OPERATE AS.THE
EXCLUSIVE UNIZ OWNERS' ASSOCIATION WITH RESPECT TO ANY UNIT.
SECTION 3. 38-33.3-205 (1), Colorado Revised Statutes,.1982
, Repl . llol., as amended, is ametided BY THE AUDITION OF ANEW
PARAGRAPH tQ wead:
~ .
i 38-33e3-2050 Contents of declaration. (1) The dec1aration must-contain:
I, (p) A STATEMENT, IF APPLICABLE, THA7 THE PLANNED COMMUNITY
IS AiARGE PLANiVED COMMUNTTY ANO %S EXERCISIN& CERTAiN EXEPIP7IOPd5 ~
FROiW j7HE "COLORADO COMMON IPdTEREST OWNERSHIP AC'f" AS SUCN ALARGE ~
PLAN ED COMMUNITY.
SECTION 4. 38-33.3-207 (1)_ (c) and (4) (a), Colorado
Revi ed Statutes, 1982 Repi. Vol., as amended; are amended, and
the aid 38-33.3-207 (4) is further amended 8Y THE ADdY'fiON OF THE FOLLOWING NEW PARAGRAPHS, to read; 38-33.3-207: Allocation of allocated intere$ts. (1) The
declaration must ai]atate to each unit: -
• (c) Yn a planned co~pnunity, a fractian or percentage of the
common expenses of the association and, to the extent not
allocated in the byTaws of the association, a portion of t}te votes
in the assoCiation; FXCEPT THAT, IN A LARGE PLANNED CflMMUNY7Y, THE
. COWIMON EXPENSES OF THE ASSOCIAI'ION MAY BE PAID FRONi ASSESSMENTS APla ALLOCATED AS SET FDRTFi IN THE DECLARATION AND THE VOTES IN THE
ASSOCIATION MAY BE ALLOCATED AS SET FOitTH IPI THE OECLARATIpN.
PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 94-216
~
• . (4) (a) The declaration may p.rodide:
(I) That different allocations of votes shall be made'to
the unuts ora particular matters, specified i~a tli~ declaratian;
i
~ (II) For cumulative vo$ing or~l,y for the_purpose of eleeting
members of the executive boaa^d9 (III) For class voting on speCified issues affecting the
tiass if necessary to protect val'id interests of the class; AAtD • .
t .
(iV) FOR LARGE_ PLANNEfl COMMUNITIES CREAi'ED AFTER, JULY 1,
1994, FOR assESSMENts iNCLUDINb, BUT NOT LIMITED T0, AssESSMENTS
0N RETAIL SALES, REAL ESTATE TaANSFERS, AND SRECIFIED SERdICES
WITNIN SUCH LARGf pLANNEO COMMUNITY. ~(c) ASSES5MENTS ALL06dED UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (IU) OF
pARAGRAPH (a) OF THIS SUBSECTION (4) SHALL BE EPITITLED TO THE LIEN
PROVIUED FOR UNDER SECTYON 38-33.3-316 (1) &UT SHALL NO1' BE
EidTITLED TO TWE PRIORITY ESTABLISHED BY -SECTIO(d 3$-33.3-316 (2)
(b) ~ ,
I(d) LaRGE PLAP1fdED caMMUNiTiES 5PECZFYiNC,cLAS5ES FOR VOT[NG
IN TWE DECLARATION AS ALL4WED PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (III) OF
PARAGRAPN (a) OF THIS SUBSEC7ION (4) MAY bESIGNATE CLASSES OF
PIEMBERS ON A REASONABLE BASIS WHICH DO NQT AILOW~I'WE DECIARANT TO
CONTROL TME ASSOCIATIQN BEYOND THE PERIOd PR4VIOED~ FOR Ifd SECTIOId
3$-33.3--303 OR i'D CONTROL THE AS50CIATION ;T0 :AN EXTENT GREATER
TNAN ALLOWED FOR PLANNED COMMUNITIES OTHER THAN LARGE PLANNEb.
COMMUNITIES, IiVCLUDING; WITHOUT LIPIITATION, RESIDENCE OWidERS,
COPIR1ERCIAL SPACE OWN£RS, AA(D OWNERS OF L4DGING SPACE AND TO ELECT
P1EMgER5 TO THE ASSOCIA7'IOfd EXECUTIVE BOARLI FROM SUCM CLASSES.
I SEC`I'%aN S. 38-33.3-303 (5) and (8), _Colorado Revised
Statutes, 1982 Repl. Vol., as amended, are am~Pided to read: .
138-33.3-303. Execut7de T board members and mffieers. (5) Subject to subsection (6) of this section, the
deelaration may provlde for a period of dec]arant cantrol of the
associatian, during which period a declarant, or persons
designated by #4-ra SUCH DECLARANT, may appoint and remove the
afficers and members of the executive baard. Regardless of the
periad of declarant cantrol provided In the declaration, a period
of declarant contro7 terminates no later than either sixty days
after condeyance of seventy-five percent of the units that may be
created to un9t owners other than a declarant, two years after the
la:st conveyance of a unit by the declarant in the ordinary course
of business, or two years after any right to add new units was
last exercised; EXCEPT THAT THE TWO-YEAR PROVISIONS SHALL NOT .
APPLY TO TERNiINATE CIECLARANT CONTROL Ild A LARGE PLANNED COMMUNITY.
(b) A declarant may voluntariiy surrender the righL' to
PAGE 4-SEidATE BFLL 94-216 '
900i200'd bb02 998 205~ HdSO 90:9T b66T-£Z-JIdW
~ 19RY-23-1594 15; 08 USPB 303 866 3044 P.004i006
' ' ~
- J
appoint and remove officers and'members of the executive baard
before terminatbpn of the periad of declarant control, but, in
' that event, the declarant may require, fpr the duration of the
period af- declarastt control, tbat specified actians of the
assflciation ar executive board; as descrfbed in a recorded
instrument @xecuted by the decl arant, be approved by the declarant
befao^e they became effective.
(8) Notwithstanding any provislon of the declaratian or ,
bylaws to the Conttrary, the unit owner5, by a vote of sixty-seven
percent of all persons pv°esent and entitled tv vote at any meeting
of the unit ouuners at which a quorum is present, may remove any
member of the executzve board atith ar without cause, ather than
a member appointed by the declarant OR A MEMBER ELEC7E0 PURSUAN7
TO A CLASS VOTE UNDER SECTION 38-33.3-207 (4).
~ SECTIION S. 38-33.3-315 (2) Colorado Revised Statutes, 1982 f~epla VQ1., as amended, is amend d to ~^ead: ;
i
38-33.3-315. ;Assessments for common expenseso (2) Except
for assessments under subsections (3) and (4) of this section AND SECTIpId 38-33.9-207 (4) (a) (IU), all common expenses shall be
assessed against dll the units in accordance with the allocations
set forth in the declaration pursuant to section 38-33.3-207 (1)
and (2). Any pastmdue cammon L-xpense asSessment or installment
thereof sha71 bear interest at the rate established by the
'assotiation not eXceeding twenty-one percent ger year.
SECT%0N 7. Effectibe datee 7his att shall tak@ effect July
1, 1994. , .
SECTIOAt B. Safety clause. 7he general assembly hereby
. ' .
. ~
PAGE 5-SENA7E BILL 94-216
1_ .
f9 nds, determines, and dec7 ares..that. thi s_ act._i.s-necessary for the
. ammediate preseryatiun of $he public peace, health, and safety.
~
i
_ ,
. am Mortan C ar es E. era^y
PRESIDERIT OF SPgAKER OF THE HOUSE • TNE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIbES
• ~ .
I
oan A i Ju 1t M. Ro rigue
' SECRETARY OF CHSEf CLERK OF TNE NOUSF
5'HE SENATE QF REPRESENTATIYES
.
t
k,.
PPR011ED
Ray Romer
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
PAGE 6-SENA7E.BYLL 94-216
900fZ00'd bb0£ 998 202 SdSO 90:9T b66i-2Z-JIHW
rIRY Zb ' 94 11 :28RM . R. R EO. O~P ~~y p, Z
, ^ .
I ~II '
I
' I ;.jl •
~ • ~
~
n ~C~+~ I ~IICCF~8~4~ ~L9 W~r-~II68'S~-0~ • co"
-SMY= MEMp V=V=A ?zzLSQB m
covw Nm n GDmmuemo
~ ~t :L Meetinqs, representatives of
;~sociat.iaa gronP oPprasirag SM 216 pg~~~ats-cou16 raot,.Dave_bom bnilt =der
. CCXOA and'tliat C1aIC& =intentionally
iLmito tka flaxibi1,Lty ei° deeelop~s or ,
~JCw WGJ o .
Reprogentati~ ~f the oppos9,tion
testi~ied In the Senate Busftaens and~
Aftsiz-a cmmmittee heaciag that
g~teriag bs~a~ fioe the a~el Prap~g
$ ' at the aclcaowledges taat thera ijbguld,
~ 2aQMtJom :Evg large, saastax-p].atnsed
o ties - and As presently ater3eing on ;
S=h u ame$ to The oppo$itian preCsra
~o wai°~ Mti1 the Nationaal Boa3,`dl seets
, Were seeking relieg f.7a Co7,aaradoo
~ ~~e are impart=t proJer-ts in the
process isa Colgredo Vha.a}% nee+d imediate
rSI.16f a ThOse AMO3Ud6 vaWU ASSOCaatea m ,
B J.or G,9left prejeCt axd Keyston~
~ t&Ws Xantez=a de~opmtato ,
• 7~8 ~ ~ e anQi, AN wCnuOQgmr . '
T_P87bY~ED PROMVv ==r=Q IT °L'SH a'~iBTS •
mmwg 3'88'L' I'Y wd4LA Ait ~tCBffiOIIBL~' `
AMMSM 8gMMZMg 8WC8 GMM
0=0Aa ALMM WSWDS R1b+CS Ie M9t AFF== iZ' 98 EUB
mTm"w ~ p~~0~'s ~ aDA~offi ~As ' TO YLLQpyWq~t ~~~yy~qq
. F! or ~ ~.yA~ Qtlildd~Ai ~ e yi~y ~!/AL~Y~O.
1
~
I
9~k~ ~e~q, oe~oeo 4~ ~vFar~ am1 ~B~ ~OB ~'8-~~ ~A~ ~~9) ~`i1 ~7
' i~ ~tQd Af~ ~e~
, i ,
rIHY 26 '54 11 :2BRM V. R. R. E. , GROUP ~ P. 3 ~
, .
;
2=37 ]M=
Cs fte abigity Ovid~ V=ied
dMQCI."ILtj4 ~ rGZmS ~f qQvetlUL'Mta
wgse lSmtiAl°[@d Amm thIO ~*"=Oe si~~
~~OV8 da.~fargtt clagsgrg a:f owwraers ( guch as
raSjd i~SLj awmmgroa 1adge ownsrs .=d
CUVMS=iaI owtte=) to e].*ft & •
~ ~o the Asswiatiaws board
TI-Ag camot be dom undex .
. • ~r ~~aat$ s3Gh &ffi `~e c3IIes ment'd.med OR $hs
~av~~ ~~e use a variety of xevea~ ~
~ arder to proride neaaseary ~
~~i~3~~ ~~e3r-orora~n~-°'1'~o~m re~raaiue
I t~~~ uSCd ~er cCx~ as `
~,s~ ~emo~1g~ e~'~so ~t~epregentatig~ ag I
Oppoaition atXerwd relie£ 3a thJS are& I
L2 tkaeir AMAttWant and apparently 40 aaa~ ~
~
this maditicattiono
~e%pejawo of 2,argtAB cONM=f,ta,es mee~ ~
~elieg fto~ ~e massivn dlaecl.asu~Og' ~
gsVired by aCYOA which aaem to regua.se
gu to predS.at the c.ans" of N
davelopmen'~ ~f their projoct~ - wbdch f
~~d take morG tJ=sa I dOcIda tc =ple"o
~~'rides mo«st re13,e~ ~f t-higo
type.
~bw ~g trie ABA
aditaria3 ~~d and a stwot~ auppot-tter O'l
e~~ ~~teda . ,
of. [CMoILg
a,nnibit deve9.opmental flexibilitY
' i€a large, Mastsr-plaruagd
cmau7itieao T bealeve thir. lvffi~
or c1axibility resul~ frm
applicstion at cvndamizxi= •
yj cqa,V3.es tm lar5oo p1a=ad-taait ' devei~pim ('CLMO) 0 °due re9LSl.t _
ln uriuriour. tl3 the i31d1Ys'Crye
dev B'r ama $r8 COWt.noes+,
• ~
II .
; MTFL P. 03
;
I
P /
,
. 4%O/Vai
I
8amr Cree1N Resos
i P.O.lm 95S ,
Avan, COIafBdo i16N
y~,~
ME1+'d ~dOTA~l
7C1r84S5800 ~~v
J0.~49~
• FAX 3M95~'i77
. '%'p: , y Dalg/
FRORR: E ZB si~ i Conwic1e
DA o F tuary 10, 1994
RE: B log OWch bevelopme4tlCalorado = C mmon %nterest Qwnership Act .
I
• ,
, , I I
%aa, prmcp the l=d use glantuag fog the Bachelor G'ulch developmeat, we have
deternilned ehat rela4vely -new Colorado Land Use Act, the Colorado Cornmon Iateresg
Owmership Act (`CC%OA'I, oontains provisions whach may preveat us from utilazin,g
: maag? of the feat s wbich w~ successfully incorparated into the Beaver Cgeek land use ,
documents (and hic~ have been adapeed by maay resorts throughout the State of
Colorado). Co u~tly, We Wpldld E'o6QmIIleIId Ob4AiLtdslg C118'Btl~ Ieg16~~On f0 SIIOW
majoe, eor~plex gojects such as Bachelor Gulch to develop along the lims af Beaver
• Cresic.
_...._.._._.._._._.,._._~.._._,._....:_._..i._
'%be pxan i ipal preblem erm we see wata CGIOA are:
A, AMsQia? Renresenta4ioR e?$'Dfst~Ct Owa'exsMILGXUJIS
Diube Cnmrmu~ftl;v A~ga~cis#ion'- Roard -f YDirec4orsWe rurM pPabably want d'astinct gsAUps of property ovvners (hotel operators,
ffieach=Ys, single-fhmaly residencx oraraers, condominitum owners and maybe raw land
ovvneYS as vvell as the Wster Dmlopeg through subst8atia1 sellmeut) td be assured of
, ciistinCY grotap repieSentati0n oa the BacheieP ~'sulch COmffiwsity Assoc,iatiaa's board of
directors. This promotes democracy within the resotfi developmeat attd gave.s a brvader-
• based gsoant ot view d= naight otherwlse be obtainecL `rhe CCIOA stafttW as it presen4ly
exists does not appew to elloev such gepaeaentariora.
doil h=eiafom. Jac --Crestars an8 Opera?ors of vail and BeBVer CroeW ResoRs
218 dno~is •3°~I•d•n wd2i:s0 b6, 92 Adw
I A
i ~
P . .
. ~ .
~
. ~o 11fiLkado", bTotm=°Y'~a~4~~rs~l
La order to pxavradc V21acty af servf ces to homeawners, we wotald l&e the
Bachelor Wch Co~UZO Assosiadon to barre authoaity to use non-t-aditional ftdsng
. $0=99 ssOa as we~e used by Beaver Crftk Resore Campaay ('BCtC'Ie Theso iaol de
an assessment oa retasT sales simi.tas 4a BCRC's civao assessme8t, and an assessment oa
' traesfer of real eMW gimalar go BCggC9s amai esiate transfor assessmeat 1hese finsncang
, saurces are not aliowed uadgr CQOA,
23,~ein
` Perhaps the ffiost "L'ting (and dangerous) grravisioass of CCIOA m a seri.e,s of
provasions reqtiiring the Malar Developer 4o iay out in advaace, and apparently in
' consider$ble detaiI, its ezl&e development scheme. I$ aproject such as Bachelor Gulal,
waach will be built oue oves a period og at ieast 15 yoars, it ia enoraiausly difficult to
pPedict the =8=w qa whach the resort wf II9 ar shovlc, devetop. The prov?asiosas of
CCIOA seem designed fo8 inciividuai cccmdoffiiaium complexes aad ot}ses pro}eces which
. are lilcel3? to be completgd a ahort period af time and cau be canceived.i.n its
entirety at the autset. i
We understand ehag eg ski smas, such as Iteystc~ne, have also expressed
< concerns aboue the e~~c~ eCCIQA on tbe~ fut~ deveIa
Pm~e. ~/lareova, eve hatre
leamed P~at the ~ic~al aw. 'atian w-ar-.h sponsored the un33form act whiela led to
CCIQAis cansiderisg ame dffient$ -which-weWd-exeanpt mayor rosgst dovel9pan=ts such
. as $acbelog Gulch. Gons y, we tUn3c it is mosi appropriate to
logisla8~ to seek 1egislati relief. ~~h t~te
h
~'d dnoNs •3•8•d•n w82i:e0 b6, 92 Adw
'P
. tr.
~ •
A
XW+E6dE8ar O90NSi5BAAP AFrd
~
The Cologado Common %nte~~~t Ownexship Act (NCCIOAff1
as it presently ~xists Wauld aaot allow. deve1apers of compl~x
mubtg-purpoge pgogeuto to adopt maray of the ~~~tu7ees
succe~~fulby a~~orporated in zoveral of Coloradols most
popular gesortoo gxamples ef succe6sful resort area5 which
we.ge developed using land use covena~~s which would not be
aggmr~~d usader CCIOA include the Beaver Crook ski areas the
.
Ta1lura.do gk2, area and Purgatory ski area. ania(Af the
princi~~~ ~~~~~~ersoras of CCTOA has told me that dCgOAaS
effect ore major projects was uniratentianal and shaubd be
addressed by the g~~~~~tureo
a'h$g memorsB°adum ia intended to idlontify eome of the
1~mitagaons imposed by CCIOA wkaicYa will alffiost undQUbtedly
a •
~ haLmper the future develogament af similax projectso TbLe
magtegs adealtified bekorE _~re thatAght. attthar of this
AYVdNoradAdm7Y to O./e i!f 8Ya7ob c0/3lRVab{66 m00e6W a@!e aMS.OdAy Mt = Nartb
8
FJ'f b\.rI4/d2 C00M yyenti4Pd6ed iei thdLs mRS6\lC/baA{13456M COhdOph W?Yu.d+d pose
significaaat problems fAr aaajor developmentso For convenience,
tkais meinv will use the larid txse aovenants in effect for the
. Beaver Creek Resoa°t as the basis for a~entifyixag the
~
' prmvisions of CCIOA most gikely to 13mit fttture pro jects o
•~i ,
~ I -
V 'd dnoNs •3•a°d•n w8ei:s0 b6, 92 Adw
,
, • .r
• ~
. ~
~n th~ ~ov~~nlne~ Daar~ of Dfr~ct~rs q
The lasad us~ ~~cuments cxeating the Beaver Creek
~ Resort Com~any (the hameowierso association whicta cantrols
mos`~ ~ctiviti~~ at Beavex Creek) allows ttae ovsaer~ of distinat
gypes of property to be assursd of regresentation ` oaa the
RGSOgg Coffi~~ny°s Bosrd of Direcgosso The glroups cJtaaraxateed
' boagd representation ag ~~aver Creek a.nclraded (a) owaiers of
residenS:iag units, (b) owaers af commercial units (such as
re;l aii shops and restausants) o (c) ownirs of hateXs and other
godging facil3.tiesB and (d) owners of undeveloped lotso
Td$bi1e S 38°33 a 3m207 of CCIOA allAWs land b1se
~ d~clarations to provride wPor class gratinq on speci£ifi~7 ssues
' ~~tecting the c1ass if necessary to protect valid intexests of -
gB~~ classo pthiffi provision does not appear to go far eaaough to
. ab2,ew class voting for 'ch?e election of direatogsag Xt the
leasti:, the pravision is amloiguous on ichis point aaad would
probab1y be litigated •with potential].y unfortuaste results
for the honsowaaeg~P ~s~ocia~ionp whose a~~~farts ffiight be ,
• invabidated at directors are ubtimately disqu~litieae o
Beaver Creek Resort Company tvas Inteaeded to be more
1. gt as d~~~tabla whether the electiora of director$ is an
"isomeO as used in CCZOAo or whether a clags vote gar
digectort. ig oneceseary to protect o 0 o the ciasse0
-2-
S'd 8(10N9 '3'J'd'A WdbT:60 b6. 92 AdW
- !
I ~
li,e & town governmenit and chamber of coanaue oe thass a tl?picab
homeowners8 ~~sociatione %n that conaaectioaia the Resort
i
Cosnpany wa~ ~~quired to providep amonq ot?beLt tkaings gsecurity
~erviceso an extonsfve transportatioh' syst em, a central
reserv~~~~~~ ~ervice artd to advertise and p Qmote the Resorta
gn order to accamyalish its vax°ious ftznction the Resort
company needed a variety of fue?ding sotarces, and it elected ta
ttse fundang machBnistds sim3.lar to thgse used by iracorpoacated
mountain comavsnities o Thus the Resart Company vaas givera
atzgpaogity to a.mpose an assessmeYit asa retail sales (sia4ilar to
~
a'gov~rnmeratag sa].es taat), ts assess t ansfers of r~al estate
• (simigar to 'k.he geag e~~ate transfeg 'tl7ees ~hich are
. ~
ix~~~easingly popular in mountain conn=itie and to(impose
• i •
. an as~~srDment an'laft tickets, ski lessons Ind other
recreational actzvities in arder to make su le that ttae owaler
' of" thg Beaver Llreek S]ei area was contributing equitably ~o the
Resort Co~~anyo Tk1ese sourees ef funds have been ~ery
important to the success-vt -BQavar--Creekv -
%t would alppear tYaat none ef these reet~-traditional
~ources of fusade would be available under CCIt3A. CCgoA seems
to oontemplate onby the it~~ditioraag type of assessment imposed by hoffieownerBa asseciation%o Section 3-3303-207 requires a
graat~~~ peraentage of common ex'pensas of the associatiore
. be allocated to emch unita th~ ~f which messg eVal 100%e
Whiae a clev~r dra£tsman iaigP~~ try to dgaft a provrgsion
, _3tl
g'd ' 8f10N9 °3'~I'd'A WdbZ :E0 b6. 92 AdW
~.`~f
I
algo~?inq non-tgaditianai £undinq sourcec sucta as those
presently ~~~d in Deaver Cgeo}ca such an att pt would aimost
~ ~ertair~~~ ~~L leaaged $n cottrt a~d would xe a higYa ris*le of
bei,nq held invabada Corasequentlyo raew homaQwnersa
assocbation~ ~anraot re1~ on thoae furacla8~~ m ' hanisme ta
g~rovide f~ands that ~y be needed to succ~~g lby perform its
£unations an the comanunity which ~t iserveso :
Thg need ta uti1~~~ a variety Of funding sourees -is
pgebablY onZy applacable to homeowness a associagioaas servici.ng
major ffiixed use land develepmerat projeets which will proviele a
bsoad range of segvices to gts cottstituentso It may be
, =aaecessarY (axad perhaps tanwfse) to allow typical resa.dentiale
'gnly pro . jects to aase these broader rav Inue-producing
tectataaqueso
' So It~eA-t-1.f1Ca$ion Of__balm!@ L'7Y012pffie8, Qhttllo
'd Perhay@ $lae ffies$ tr0ublgnq aspect o$ CCIQA to a
develope.r of a major project, a.s aseries of grovis Qns
_ _ eu~ ga~ advar~~~o ~nd re ~ome
detag2,, bts entire development ache~meo 1 Majox proje t~ such as
Bea~~r Crack were built oveg several decades. Beaver Creek
was figst p1atted asa 1.9°78 and it is sti.ll tianderqoiatg
developmeatta As tiffies and tastes change, tlaese projects ffiust
•ry chang~ ~~~h theffi o F3.exibigaty is one of ttae developer° a most
o4a
L'd dtlO~IJ WdSt eE0 b6. 92 JIdW
, ' .r .
holy maantgaso gt is not cleag wkaetheg approgriAte flex, bility
for majog projects can be obtait3ed under Cr.%QAo i i
~ • Instancee S 36-33a3m209 requfres eacta p1~~
showP nmgrag other thingso , .
~
(a) name aaad a qensral schematic plan o£ the
en,ti.rea CAmEl1Q83 alltegest cm11mt181ity p '
(b) thle locatian and aa.mensione. cf ail rzel
estate nQt subJect to aeve3onmgnt ria4~s' or
subject only ~o develonin ri h~ ~ ~Xi draw o 0 o g
,at . • a lecraliv sufficient descriptson ot a6v real,
' • ~st-ate sudJ eC°it tQ deVLid me La a hto .
' i
. , ! labelled to identifV the righ&§ ap-pliceble
. ~
' (j) 'the apnroximate locatielt ar?d dimensions of f
~ limitid common el ants a a
z;
. ` t
2. This is not a def.ined_te=_.. It..implies:.that a plan as
reqa.f~ad envesin m re tkxan the instial phase of a mtall~im
phas~~project, gagi~~Yiis plan be changeci? Hoxr? By whom?
3. OLimitec4 common a].ementsm are def3neci to mean a 1 common
e].ements designated for the exclusivs use ef one or more
(bttt 1effis $han aa1.) txa9ltso NCommon elementsO are defined
tQ be aAy roal estate css,tt°,ed ar leased by the associagiaat,
other than a unigo Thus common elements and limited
common e1effierats as def iraecl its GCIUA are gx°eatIy diffe~ent
. froaa COMman elements and liffiited common elements iaa
condominium projects. This is very lilee],y to gead te
confusione one miqht wander why a unit (which ffiay be a
lot or acoandominium unit) which is owned by the
as$oeiation is nat a common elemetato Is an easement held
by an assaefation a common elsment?
a5o
8'd 8flO8J '3'8'd'A WdST:EO b6. 92 AdW
. Q
~
. Q
. ~ ~
Iaa addation, to the extent not shown or`projected on the
• platso mmmp~ ~f the uraits mtast show or projeoto
. (c) aLny units in wYtiCh the do~1.arInie ha~
reserved the riah~ ta ere:te addi-idfla~
Mafts or camman alem,entffi ic3entifig!a
A~tempging tA 6omplY with these maaadate& ira a Project
csavera.aago sffiY, g, 909 acgesp and which may be, buigt out over a
~ 20 og ~ ~-y~ar ~erbod is awesomeo Evren usiatq the most
conservativ~ approach og trying to reaerve the broadest
; . development rights ovrer agl areas for whgch speeific plans
; have aaot bees8 fanalazed has its hazards becatzse of ~e very
reab thgeat that hvmeawa~~~ri. may chalbenge (m) the adequacy of
the descgiption ot the developaasr~~ right, (b), iaYeether the rea].
° effi~~~~ subject to the development gights taad ma Iegally
' sufficieaat descgiptionmp or (e) whetlaer the real estate w~~
~ propegly plabagY~do or pidesatified appropriatelyo" .
Yr? addition..to...tkae.,_praviaivns..,af...S..38m33e3=2Q9, 5 38-
33 a 3n2o5 gecgtaiges eeery declaratioaa ooa~tain, ~morag otl~er
. T
thingse
. (f) a eiescreipgioa af aray lfmited comneon
eiementSv e o e a -gignneL1 L.'omm~nitve
4. CCgOA gails to explain what identificatign will be deemed
appropriatea Anyona ter 1.3,tigatfan? Alsoo isnat the
. statute inadvertently using the term Oeonmon elemen~~ in
its condoffi4.niusu settse?
6'd 8f10'J9 '3'~1'ti'A W89t:C0 b6. 92 JltiW
. ~
. ~
,
Any rgAl s~1Lte that is ar mup,t beccme
Comm n e lemsnts o g .
4~) a, d& cr Rtion o~ ~,r real entat ,except
~
Peal estate subject to develoPment rightso
=at mav be 111,t ocated subseauent9.y as
~.~.mi~ee~ comman ~~em~n~s~ o 0 0 , ? ,
(fl) gL_descri ~'ecn _of any develoipmen rights and
other spec; al dgglaXat n?~itPhts refiervad brr
tne decla ant tocrethe~ witll a leaally
gufficient descr.~pt„ an af ttLe real, estate .
~ .
to wttich each gg-asM FJUhts annl,~er. and a
.t9.me 1 imit ~ith~ n wrh fe-h Amach ~ those
reiarhts mu t be exercised , , , ;
(1) anv restrictionp on _r,e Ugg occupancv anci
alienation of the uni s? ,,,o
' (m) sche recording data Sar recorcied easements
a
oe, t6 000 any partion of the comon
cees~a w- _ .
5 e Tlais would sem to require an tt~-to-flate title clxec3e to
. see what r~aI property has become a! common e7.ement throuq$a
owaaership or lease by the assacistiono It is hard to
imagine any real esieate that pmust became" a common
elemesai: o
6. It &rauld seem that all rea1 estate mig'ht evel°itually be
pallocatedp ~s a limated common elemeYtto If a dleclarant
fail@ to describe sueh real estate, can gt never ever
~ become a limi~~~ common eleffient?
7. Can these restrictions later be changed? E13minated?
Could a ban on woodburning girepl,aces be impoged 18ter
air pollution becoffies a problem?
aya 0T•d 8no8s •3•8•d•n wdgi:Ea V6, 92 Adw ,
i
a
. ~
~
gnterest eammunity. is or may become subj ect
• by vartue of a res~~~tion in fiche
decgarationa (sic)
oaace agaa,n the developer of a cotnpJ,et project is .
challengsd to look fas Irato the future and to make
curreaa~ ~ommatmesats wfth respect go tae fanal ou~~ome a~
his projeeto Any failure ta accurately prad~~~ most
d~sirabl,e buaZdout of kais pra~~ct wial li]cely condemn the
i i
developeg (a) to hgs original coeaception or (bj' to yeara
og protracted easpensive l2,tigatione
6, Exeraise og bevelopffient Ric!' tRo ~
Us?der CCI6A 5 3 S=3 30 3=29,0o saela time a declarant
wiskaes to ex~~oise ssay clevelopmerat riqhtsp ttae decla~ant must
; exeguto aaad gscord an aaaendmerat to the declaration compl.yirag
: ~wi'th the provisaon8 og 5 33°3303°269o in a c4mp1ex
a ~ developmento thas will require hutzclx'eds or pegl1aps
. thousarads of amendmeratso The mast commoaa amendmeaat will
occur wheaa the declsrant'- (or more likelye _a. deeeIoper to whou
a c3eclaxant has sols4 a urait fag purposes ef baildang a multim
~nit 5tructure) ddas compleFsed a new sbd csc~ureo
in ogcier fog tkae declarartt (og assbgnse) to amend the
declaration in compliance with S 38a33 0 3-209o the amendtaent
must irteclude a saew (a) schematic ylan of the ment3re cAmmoaa
interest cammunity9 0(b) descriptiora of the location and
o8o
TZ'd dfl0?J9 '3'?J'd°r1 WdLZ:CO ti6, S2 JIdW
i
~
~ .
dimansioa~ ~f D_11 real estate not subject to development right .
1
~ o 0 0 and the locatgon and di.mension ;o:f &U exfsti.nq
, .
' improvaments ~r~ithin that raal ~~~at~; and (c) so foxth ttrough
~A
, the eight subsectaons and 14 submsubsections oi ttaat 5 38-
, 33 0 3°209 0 Sin~e this amendment would need to be accura~e as
@f 'the date at as £igedo the applicant would have to
~ inoorporage agl tla~ ~equired data Jt a 1 prajects cempleted in
tta e pga8~~~~ ~ommraaagty prior to the dati of tkiat amendmex~~
~~en though $ho6e proj~cts may havre been (arad probably were)
undet.°taleen by otkasrg arid lnay not be readal1r atiailableo
~
Tha provision saay ffiake sense in the case DE the
. aiaagl.e mandom raiuaa project which typicably earried out by
one declarant rasfaag a very thoroughly cenceived ~Jlan 3ntended
• to be coffipleted in a year or twoa As appbied to ;a coanplex
. gesort, thie provisfora wrould appaar to ba, at thd least,
. i
btAr~encome aXld, ~t the Y41ost, til9idor9Sableo
5p ~~~visfon of
. , . r.{..._
CCIOA ~ 38--33 e 3°213 3llows the subdivisioa~ ~f uni~s
under cextain circtamstanceso gx~ thgo cQeinectiono it should b~
~ nated tkaat in most cawes the exegcase of asay development right
is likely to resugt in a subciiwgsfon of unitso Thus these tw~
~ections sffiould be read in usaisAno
ixa order to subdivide a unit under the cited sectaano
thg unbt oraner 81tust fi1e an application to the homeowazereg
a9v
Z~ d df10N9 '3'N'd'/i WdBT :E0 b6, 92 JldW
? t /
• 'Q ~
' a~~oLation, whicki aarentlcaaa sefuse to a
~ PP Y pprove the
, I
sit&adivisiono Thas q3ves ara enoruous antourat,of cotat.rog to the
' hoffiwI wmizgft° ~~~~ciation and bs 9.ikely to be the sotxrce of ~
major contro~~sy.and litigatiott in a conpleac developmerat
proaecto
. Even during the period the declaxant maintaa.ras
' . contgol of the hotueowners' associationp this provision.can
caus substaratb~l misch3.efa ror instance, the deve].gper Qf a
compleiced coradomanium prAject whioh has not sold out may have
! I
very good a,conomic reasons to oppase the developanent other
I
pr03~cts whivh wigl compete with hbso Morsoverp owners of!
lproperty n ar gaew px'ojects oftexa dlisagree with a exact '
. locatgon, ebght or appaagance of rteighboring pr jectso
~ppt the o Han6eo the homeo~erraa associaLtion may k?e utaler
,
raox°maus pmessuge whera cvnsiclering wtaet'aer og raot to appxove
~tzbdbvasio s and the dire
~ o ctors app nted by declaratat are
, likely to ~e thre€ateaaed with persoraa. liability due to the
pfiduciaryA nature af their respons9.bilities as set. fortYi in
CG'gOA 5 38°33 0 _303 (a) o •
gap CCxoA S 3s-33o3-215 aalows the declarant
Tnaintain salng aff icese nanaaement affices and mo~els in a
esmmen intarest carnMur?it but enl if tha declaration so
~roy.jdes and @necsfie~ tIIe piahts of a deelarant wsth regLLrd
°1Oe
f~
EZ'd . df10N9 '3'8'd'A WdBt:EO b6, 92 JIMU
.
.l
: tethe number. gsme. lacation aL" JocatIon therea~0m
(EmpPsas a.s added o) The section goes o19 to state tYaat'any rea l
esta~e used as a sa1es affice, manaagement office or modeb and
not designated as a unit by the declaratian is a eommofl
~~emento ~
This pxovisi~n would be esetremely difPf,cult to
comply with in a 1arge pg~~~ct whioh will be Qevelaped over
time.~ _ ~~w can a developer toll whst size or loCagi0n a
sales oggioe or aanag4ment office zhust be some ten years
henceomuch 1.~~s where it shou].d be located e Moreovere the
c .
' proVisiofl1 ~onVe$'$i81g rea1 egtate w$11cp1 mSy foY a fRC9E{le1'b$ or twO
; have been uzed a osales efficew o~ onanagement officam
• (both ambicjacug germs) ingo cammon elemen~s would be puna.tive
and disruptive ta clevelopment of a ressrto
(b) ePXOA § 38-33 0P.-301 does aaot ailow anyone who
does aaot own a ungt in the coMunuhIty to be a mem?bex. This as
nog necessarggy a gaod thange At Beaver Creelca the oArxier of
' ~~aver Creet ski area--"s---raqtai-red to be a member o£ tti~
Beav~~ ~~~ort Company a?].though it aw-ned no property .
, withgn the Resorto The pur,aose for reqttbring svach memberstaap
was 90 that the Resort Comgsany corald gmpose assessments ora the
S. A cau~~ous declarant miq]xt inelude In the declaratior? the
right to m$intain aaa uralimited number of sales ofgscase
Maasagement offices artd mociels ot any size anyahare ira the
plaraned comtaunity, and to relocate them at any time to any
o'kher lcoatgono However, such qeneral etateffiea~~s mgy run
• ~~oul @2 § 33=33 0 3m112 or 33-330 3m113o .
o11e .
bZ *d 8f10Ns '3'N'd'A W86T:E0 b6. 92 AdW
.
owneg of ihe ski area to help defray the costs of advertising
the ResoYto
! (c) cCzOA 5 s$-33o3m303(5) requires the dociarantoa
control of the hemeownerse association ta expire wno later
. than either so days after conveyanae af 75 percent og the
units that iftay be created o°o, two yeats after the la$t
conveyance of aunit by the declarant gn t he ordinary Course
or busbness, or twa years after any right to sdd noW un1ts was
last exercisedo The aesthor of thia memorandum iaas g?o quazrel
' wbth the f irst two prorrisions which geqttire a change in
~
, .
coaatrol; however, reqx3ring declarant control go terainate if
, for two yeags the rfght to add r~ew units is not ~xercised a,s
vegy dangerous o During -a good reai estate markete gt is
1. aratirely conceivable that more than two yearse inventorgt of
uEa3.ts woulci be created. Thus tvao yeaxs could aasily lapse
;
: without new unitg mes.ng e.reated, thize triggeranq aloss of
u
control wall before tinab buildouto PTo logical reason' im
apparent for because o~ ~
~arket downtrarno gn iEacto. durang a 3aagket dowYittirn it may be
morg important thaa~ ~~er for the develope~ ~airatagaa control
so thar the developmer,t thetao fs nat abandaraed an favQr of
short-ite= interests dtaring t2ae eoonemic dowreturno
, (d) CC%OA ~ 38-33e3=903(8) provides that a ffiembes of
the executgve board (other than a member appointed by the
declarang) can be removed by the two-thirds vote of all
-3.2-
ST'd df10N9 '3'N'd'/t Wd6Z:E0 b6. 92 AHW
persone entg$aed to vate at any meetisaq ef the unit ownerg in
which ~ quarum as presento %fo as Is o€ten deairab2.eP
desigraated cb~~~er, of owrtera are a1~ow'ed to elect tkaeir own
representatives, ~t wauld seeaaa unfair to aliow ~emoval of o
saya a directos gepresentiaeg commegcial interests based upon a
vote made up praffiariiy af pessons owraing residetitial unitao
G. KoVin Coaw i,ck
; . . -.r~.~.. _ . . . . . . •
ol3Q .
~a/BOa
9Z 'd df10No '3'.N'ti'A Wd02:C0 b6. S2 .IFJW
05:00Pl'ZV. R. R. E. GROUP EIAO DSSM 1d7087 P. 992
,a
.a. °
o `
f
d
~g catcha9T8 ~ ~RBrien
8 @o mog8i$$ . Cmvick
DAM. T6xg&%Kff g6a 199A
` ta~~ =VieW Of ttae- COloraAg d~ 232tIr69t
, ownoa: Act CpCCXO&°) f,ndiCatee $Mt £t fff uttlikft1~ that
..~=---ram1.....aatatML, ~~esomaaats
arA r~~ ~ MR3,e8 ~f zMMVM=diaa v5.thi.n !
tag& A~sftt (O~~vIc Asoasmam~~) are p tto~ wWkw =OAa '
~~~Uta Q~~ ~eadlive JULY 1v I993 ~ =MAIXM
the
that each i paroaL
~ iv ;Lsaan Bm gmisitmed am zraztion ar p=c=tm9e of tta~
cmmon cmes @g th~ ~~ociat30n o a o o~ ACC== Ezvenaes~
~~~ned @s w1rtual.ly a3..1 UabMt~~s :Ccw mpandtita=e.m of ~
waa ~ p anffi~~~~~~~n whica has asseaamsnt powewrp aga3mt
I
~state wgtnin the ~SWC, it~ taing some
• tatd lonal 3wev-1sf~ wbicft acm7.d be =ad to justify Ctmdiaag
m ~i~ ~s UTA and cfvic As"sMma~~" those
y~~s, iosag' are ~p~~.t#.~giy ~de ~j~ ~ the sata~~°~ory
lyroviaims gequi~~g syscifia fsactic3= or psrmxatagen as
above,,
t ~ I
~ .
. I '
,
~
I
I
' a , . •e aUAY_j~~ _'94__ 0,: 01PrjmV._A. R~. . SaROUP mto D~ ~Qp098 P. 3 ~OU~
o '
C=C-1.~~i wi~ es~ u~?~
luni. ity 5choo1 of Lawo ftcr*5602~
agg the pri=ip~l draftOMM Of OA and sgae"@ .
~ ~atAg8~ ~ ~cxm As set forth o
~ila~~ a6d w,th the sLuthcw of iB
ta~a Q~$ ~~c)& doas ta~ ~ ~OP4w-%Y
~~gMt deVUjqp=MtSn aa~ that Cr-io~
~ould belamendeA LO allow i dwel tr. utilizing mode,sn
ai5 wm &me In 4viw . ' - proresscw WLnok=
~~come,~" tbagbe started righ~
avagp att=p'~ bo &aft to `atend C x:L
go ~ xilli ~ wwk wift us in
~ . .
' I
~
' ! u
'
~
I '
. /
a~a
S
1
1
i
; -
V. Fl. R. E. GROUP P.2 '
f M P02'
e . k, •
.
I
i
~ M155
`10N VICJO MPANY
y- 1d p 1~9,9 .
Offics of tY~~ ~~ve=og ' .
Coiorad~ ~~~te ~~pitog • 200 Sast Colftx
DenVero co $0203
Dear Governor era
Tliis letter 16 ~Ia regeica~~~ senate 1311 94-216 mmer,ditsg t.t~e
C+Daor8do COmffion $ntireB$-.. er81'iip- -AcC , wlYi4:h I LYrge 1?0u $o
sign is~~ ~alwo The purpoee of th3,~ Amemftent is to gaoilitate
conps9ehendive glanning and develapme=at gflarqe anagter plannad
casmunitfeso ~e existing Aat, an xrittana is fnterided ar a
consumer protection aaeasurso anadvar'kentl m i'~ sets up roac~
bloc~ t@ the Planninq of b~i~e projects ~r~tYa long ti,me boxiQ
:s
~~r exampleo zi lands Aa~~o where I an mployede is a 22ev00°
acxe- proi ect'Wf a 30-yeer projeatod bttild-outo It fs impoom
sible to k~~ ~ith reciaios~ at the ir~oaptfora how evety a~are of
l~d will uiti~iate~y be dovolopod and built. It vould have
been similar~~ impamaible 30 yaars ago to datormkrte lan4 umo
pat~erns 3n Morado in 19940 Thus, cso'mmon sonso diatates tbat
fZexilbility aaunt eaeist wit.isin a larad use maater Ian ta tcaka~
appropriate decisions i~a tlia gtitu~'eo Ser~ate Hi~l 94-216 is
inteBa~~ ~o do thatp w1°iile @tili qiving conaumers tha Actg~ prote~~ion at th~ time ttaey a ire property from a buildero
~ semanti@ d1~~inotion should ~adea t2~e niaundQrstandihg of
v~~ch haffi causa~ canxidex-abls coniusicn That in the distina-
tion betweea~ a Odevelopero' and a 41buil ara 13 A devalaper ie a
persoa~ ~ntity thnt does commuraity larnin and infrantrua-
tuss irestalsationo A huilder deals tth ing diiriduab projeCts
. vi~~~~ ~ ~ommunity and constxuat¦ buf~dirags wi3aich may ]be so1d
to a coraeumer Crasidoratial at catnmerai 1). Benat. Bill 94-216
is iratenc9ed to allor dewelopers to p1a' large praj.atso but JA
not inteaa+ded to deprive consumers of t e 9Protacti~ of the Aat
e~~ ~~spect to prajects built and sol` , by buildBZso
5:9 Senat~ Bl~,g 9~-216 dong P?e2~e beaom ~ law, developers me~y be
~'ore0~ '~O abind~~ ~~~~er planTdinq o sUbdivids largs lA3Yd ho1d~
in~r. into, amatg tractsp arad ma9ce short-ran e c4oois3onr ar~ a
basiso I ~a~ait that tla~n S,s sxactly the
gesult tYa~~ shoubd be avaidod by pol~cynakmrsd
i
. - _'!:F 6o~~ EVAF0 b13MLs,Nos RANIcb a c~~DRAco ea,z5 ~ (69 7S1•51ao
,
, H5 M~Y ~5 '11 ~t,Q4611 V. R. R. E. GROUP P. 3 P Q3
~
_ ° . The H~~~~~bl~ ~~~s2~ •
maY 2.7, S'9 ~ ~
~o quote The Colorado Yraflad U6e AG$o Cm2ia$o 24=65,4102 (i), °'~1~
GOt'~Oral Ass ly finds a~ad dsCla~res ~at ~e ra~pid qrowth ana
develop~~~ ~9 thQ stiate and thw resutting demands an land
resousaee MaM MW and Ina~ovativa measures a~mr-s¦aery ta exeaeu~~
~ e• p1~+~+ed and @rder9~y lar?d uoe daveiopmes~to o m " ~ataile ttniB
a ~ateaaetst of legSslative i°atont was made in a dif torent coa~~
tex'~ ~ ~t is q~~~ ~alicyo
please w9.lln Bill 94-216 Wh9,*Will ~~low larqe nartar
planned c ungtles,to be planned and devalopod o
Mar96 0o°RxGat1jgyy _ ~ ..,........_..~~._..._.~....,_d .
~enfor vioe P~~~~~ent
Coloxado DiviElon
I
I ,
I 1
. i
~
~ i
~
~
semvft Cetew Raeawt .
P.O. Dox 959 ' g
ArreA, Colaraao 81620
3031$45-5934
R,?u 303/845•5945 May 189 1994 ' .
~ Honorable 1~~~ ~omeiF9 Governor
S4ate of CoY~md~
State CagaitoIl BuiY~im~
~~ona Il~~
~~~~er9 fCola~~~
~ein
I o
Thete has been consideraiale ffiisnnderstaradflng about the
recently-engeted Senate Bill 216 which maYce~ only very imfted madi-
fications to 4he Coflorado Coffimott Intereet Ownership Act ("CCIOA")o
The purpo,e eaf $hns lettee° in to give you ~ertsin baclground facts and
~~~ar-np any misunderstandingso ,
First9 wa~~ CCIOA was asYoptea In 1991, Colorado's real estate
, . .
. market was snffering froe~ itiwo~$ reces~io~ evera A 0umber of pt°o-
i
Jects9 my condomnnaum projecta in the Denver attcl F'ront Itange. I
Me4opafit n areaz, ~ere undergoing forcclosures and othet° iinancial
mashapso It sooim became apparent tbat many of tlaese ue°ban conelom
minium projeeft had been developed in a ffianner which did not proteet
the snterests of consumerso CCIQA vvas passed to cure those probleffiaa
While CCIIOA was necessary and agpropriate, one of i#s pr3at~ary .
~~th~~ immediateBy agreed tbat its applicabili4j? to large, mastexb ~
planned communatnes was not properly considered and mnch of it~
affects on these communaties was unintended and inappropraatem He
rrecognnzed that an amendment o£ CCIOA vaas 6Curgently needed'9
Developers o#' Vail, Arrowhead and Beavee Creekj Rcsort
~d df10N9 Wd9E:20 b6. 92 AdW
r a"'
....e
t
Ho81~mb~~ ~omou- .
I~~~e Two '
May fls, 1994
Vea°y few people $ealaze tttat.under CC~OA, a num6er of very wel~
thought of c~~~muRniEies such as Beaver Creek I$esoa°t, Telluride 1Vloun-
taiaa Vil1age and Pnrgatory Vallage could not laave been builto 'I'his is
because CCYOA ° veriently prnhibited the demmc ratic and hmadn
based form of Mraamen4 ~~ovided for en 4hose resoe°t communitiesm
CCIOA also adynerWntlv prohibited the use of a varie of owner anc?
merchant assessmaent~ whieb hae helped make those areae successfulo
Everyone we ta?ked to about this problem ffor t~[ture mastor-planned
coffimunaties rec~~nized the nod. to lamit the ap?pficabitity mf tInose
provisions $o sanaHer and ffiore 9imited homeowner associationso , SB
216 cu~~~ these def~cts nn CCIOAe
Vnrtuall~ aiE of the peopYe involved en the passage of CCIOA bave .
~gr~~~ ~~~~A needed to b~ amencled to take fnto account the 1e-
git~~ate needs of developeas of large, master-p?anned cammunitfego
This anclu~~~ the Coffimunity ASSociations Institote, a gronp wbich ~
presetats hoaneowners associationsq the Colorado Bat° Asaocfatioa and
the Coffimisiiioners ~f Unfform State IJaws, In fact, at the national
levea9 the Commissionens of LTniform State L~~~ are worlaing on an
amendmeffit to the Unaform Comrnon Interest Ownersbip Acto This
amendmea~~ Includes miany of the provfsaons of 5B 2160
Becoazd9 I wou?d Uke to cBear up the misundorstanding that SB
216 was adopted specificeW to help Yail Asaocsatcs, Iraca Thfs ns nat at
alIl the caseo SB 216 as sftte-wide legielation and is supporteci by a
~~~ety of oirganszationsa Testnmony supporting SB 216 vvas given at
state legaslature by Keystone Resortg LIIacoln Wes#A Inca of Brockem.
PE~ge~ the develOpeD'~ ~f HighlaISds Ray1Chg Co1orado 17A11 CoUIOtE'a1 9the
CoIoradO RomCbuflldeE°s A8s0c9at10n a11d the COlOrado Board of
Realtors. HYghlands Rancb tesfified that ft could nat have been
deveYoped nf~ ~~s in effect when i# began its mammoth and
highlyd~~~~ed commua~ity9 isout?n of De~~ere
b' d d(10N9 ' 3'N' ti ' A WdLC: E0 06, 92 AtiW
O
•r
i Honarab9e P~oy Romer _
~~~e Three
May &8, 8994
`~~ird9 SB 216 is a mea°y nor~~ am~ndmento It appl$es only tm
commum~~~ ~~ctiimg the following three criteriaa (a) 200 ams of 1and9 -
(b) zonfng in niace gor at least 200 dwelling unats; and (e) xoning 'in
pim for at Reast 20,000 square feet of commercial spacee 'I'ttea°e are
'very few pruje~~~ ~~~ch ' meet these reqairementsm lYtoa°eove , 9B
216 exempts these ¢&evetopments fronB only a few of the provfsio a of
CCIOAo gn each case, the one~ous pr~visions, whicb the ezem~ on .
negates9 requi~ +~evelopers of ms~,or paoaects ia specdfy in ~tdv ee the
en~re d~aeflopr~ent scheme for each comtnunlty - vvith ve~°y lia~ tea~
p~sdbili~ to mot~~ ant~ adja~t the plae~ as development ~p~°ogre sese
°'h~ ~~e~ on be~g ~possIl61e9 %ad a4 the yeagt ~vauld lead ~o c,°y~
unsatisfactorgr ¢~~~~~~pmentso Pro1ects of tlie magnitude coveredzby SB
2Il6 are typicaUy buff~ out over a period of 14, 13 or even 20 years and
ime~ ~av~ ~exibitity to adjusS as the publ;c9i; tastes change and
additfonaR kaeowYedge becoffies available r8garding tlae pro,ecto
wifll Lcad to het~sr devmentse
, ~ I
&'ou~h9 the im,gor4aret consimmer nrmtections of CCIOA have be n
gAr"Irp1ja SB 216 doea not modify CCIQA's requireffient that the
deve9oper gnve up conte°oll when 75% oF ets lots have been sold9 or th~~
~~e resulting. community owwnee-9 aasociatiams be able to #eamaaflate all
unc~~scicaaable contracts and terminate all contracts bettween a4 and the
de~~~opea° wheffi the change of conta°o1 occurso
~ i • -
Severa? oe°ganhzatnons whach init~affy opposetl S$ 2X69 such as the
Community Assoc$atfons Institute, ended np withclrawin~ their oppos[-
doin after in ffew modn~cations were anade to satiafy their objectionse In
factfl $he Communnty Ass~~~~~ons Institu$e representatives askcd for
. ~odificatIlons whn~~ ~o-u1d allow afl hoatt~owners ot°ga~~atians (not
,~~~t t~~ ~argep master-planned ~mmunitfiee) to bave the ciemuerat~~
fum ~~g" f°nBUaent and bwegLeB ass`esgi n
its.
~
~
S'd dno~n •3•~I•d•n wdaG:Eo ti6, 92 Adw
,
i
~
. f~
I~~~arabRe Roy Romen°
Page Fouir
May Ilg9 n994
The EagH~ ~ounty Boardl of CommissYOner~ ~~BOC~ by letter
~eprCsBHItativE@ vtla~.'k JieBy1lOrg and 6CO~ ~o SeIIStoI° D$vC WattCHHb@:I°gg •
ezpressed theip ~~~cerns regarding an early draft of SB 2160 Follawing
sincere cansic~~~ation of ECBOC's concerns, and a coupie of further
affiendmen4sg both Ilegislators voted in favoa° of the ballo
SB 226 was reviewed in detail in t~e 6gislatiee piocesam Once ttaes
R °sfl~~on was underetood, at gaincd broad-~asedfl nonepa ° an su~~
~orL a`he baYl pasaed both houses of the Colomdo Legislatureg in the
$enate9 twenty-five voted in £~~or and eaght vmted ~gainsts antl in the
I~~use, fifty-aAz voted in favor and ngne ~oted agaensto SB 216 is a gvod
bafl whach ns ~mncfm imeeded in Colomdoo . Veff°y tral?y yoanrs9 ' VAIL ASSO~IIA°~~ AL ES'a"A'H'E GROUP9 INCo
~ .
EdwaH'd D. O9BirlleIm
VIlce FIl°e8iden4 and
,
cChieff FinancnlaIl officer .
~
gd df10z~9 '3 °N'd °A W88C:80 b6. 92 J,HW
~
P
• ` 1 ,
vma 0 • • .
. ~ 'll 5oc1ates, I c.
Cteatora and OperaYOre of 1Jai1 and Seaver Gceek" Reaoe
May 24, 1994
Mr. Gearge "Bud'° Gates, Commisaioner
Eagl@ County Boagcl oE.Commissioners
P.O. Bax 850
' Eagle, G4 81631 _
Dear Bud: The purpose of thi.s letter is to respond ta the coneerns you
have raised with gespect to Senate Bi1~ 216a The bi11, a,f
e,dopted, wi1l amend the Ca2.orade Cammon Interest Ownership
Act ("CCIOA° ) iai oraly aex'tain limited tnrays.
First, you eacpressed coneern aboug the pro].iferation af
°•specia]. Districtsp . Buci, cCIGA and SB 216 have aao
conneGtiorarwith metropolgtan. Special Dastrictsa CCIOA
xegulates; common awnership asaoci.ations sucka as eoneloeninxum
homeowner and community owraer associations. CCIOA was passed in 1991 largely xn respvnse to finaracial diffictzlties
experienced b~r, and deve2oper abuses of, individual buildiaag
, condominium ass master-
p3.snned cQmmun' y aosociations were captured in CCIO,Pa's "net" in a maanex not coratemplated by its sponsors and
authoxs. Its restrictions, intended prirnara.ly to regulate
ixadavidual builda.ng condominium associatians, are simply too
narrow via-a-viB large mastex-planned commuraity aBsrcia-
tiosts.
3econdly, you expressed conGern regarding sche provision of
SB 216 which will allow large master-planaed community owxy.er
assocfatiegaB to 7.errir special assessments, inc].uding
assessmesats ara retail sales and real estate transfars.
Z'hese, pawers already exist in associations which pxe-date
and are t.hun raot governeci by CCIOA yeti have contxibuted tv
the suecesa of such well Chought of communities as Beaver
Poee Office Bo# 7 o Vail, Cnlorndo 61658 g USA -(303) 476•5601
02 'd df1089 '3'?!'d'A Wd22:E0 b6. 92 AHW
• .
. ~ ~
Mr o Gearge "Bud" Gates
Pago Twao
May 24, 1994
Creek Resort eT~ll1drbde mountain Village and Purgatory
Village. ig is important far Iarge cvmmunity vumer
associatiaris te have selid finartcial tanelerpirisZings and
broad based assessmeat powegs kae].p assure this is ae . These
types of communbty associatidns perform furictiens such as
eemman a.rea maiaatenance (ancluding park anei grounds
beautifieatiora), in+tra-resort transportation, public safety,
design and review bdard functipns and resort spacial event
sponsorship and promotion 9.tems n9t atarcna2ly pxovided by
a single buildigag condominium owner assaciation whieh vaag
the primary object of CCIbA's regulatioxa. Yt is our belief
. that the spreading out af such casgs over each af such
community's canstituents 1oy way of mu].tiple but speci£ic
asseesments is most appropriate_ The Beaver Creek Resort
Company taoes four sepaxate $ssessmentse a two percent reaZ
estate trarasfar assessment (generally paid by buyers) , a
five percent cavic asseesment ora retaiI sales made within
the resort (most frequently pa3d by aaosa°a'esidents) ,a common
. assessment paid on real property values (enostly paid by notm
resident owmers of second homes) and a mountain/recreatian
assessmesat o£ fave percenfc on lift tic}cet, ski schaol,
tennig and golf fees (paid by Vail Assoeiates, Ince)o
E'urther, this allows the Beaver Creek community members to
, make choices xegarding,--se-~~ce--3--ave1s, ••w~~hin the resoxt tlaat
cou7.d not be responded to by a city or countZr government;
and such service demancls are self funded relieving Eagle
County of any sueh burden. Bud, I am nat avaase of arayene
beIieving that the essisterace of such broad assessmeat powers
in Beawer Cree]c Resort does anything but benefit the Beaver
Cree)e community specifiaally aazd Eagle County in general o
Egren single buildz.stg cvndominium asaoeiaCians ttave the powrer
of a~~esoment so I would hope that the isaue of multiple
assessmeazts verses single assessments wbuld not Cause
eoxicern.
Thirdl.y, you expressed concerra about SB 216' s provisbon
allowing large master-plazzned community associations to
elect directors fsom various elements within the eommuni'ey.
T21d 6f10N9 '3'2!'d'A W8E2:60 b6. 92 .ldW
MAY 25 194 04:41PM V.R.R.E. GROUP r--•, p,2
P • .
mro GeoX'ge °°BLbdo' Gaties j
P8.ge 7.'11r'ee Q.
May 24 , 1994 i
Beaver Creek Resorg Company, the master homeowner
assocbataoaa for Beaver Cseek Resort, £o$ instanae, proviclee
for the ~enants,bz~ commegcial/retail space, Awtzers of
ledgbaag faci2ities, owners of improved residences, and
owrYers of uni.mproved properties to eacta elect a o1irector to
ats board afc darectorso, Further, effective in Decembex'
1994, asa "at-large" member vaill be eleGted to the board
giv3aag iaad,epentlent represeragativ~s a majarity en the boaxc1
of direGtors. This.-assuxes-:that-Rea.ver Creek Resart Company
receives anput $rom :dbfferent sectors a£ its eommunitSr and
is regarded as amare demaeratie Porm of government than
would exist if all directors were elected at lsrge. 2
believe that Beaver Creek Resort Company has sesved its
% eomtnusaity, wg1l and know of xao critioism of its fotrm of
gevernance. .
I
i
Fina17.y, I uuatald lbke Lo assure you that BB 216 daes not in
any way ckaange the requirement that the cleveloper give up
cantrol of the owxaer association wkzen seventy-figre percent ; .
of the togal saumber of lcats in the cammunity have been svld.
We bebieve a.t xs vergr important to preserve this progrigioaa, i
which we consider a proper and appxopriate ferm og consumer
pratection.
if Imay ma]ce one more point, I~ wou d like to assure you i
that SB 216 is very narrow in its s ope and makes only very
limited chaxages tio CCIOA. Iaa suppo ting this legislation, ~
we inade sure that most af the provis ons of CC24A wexe
prevea^ved asad will apply to all of o~r projects. Ig you
.weuld 1bke aonfirmatioaa af the.fact hat SB 216 has no
adverae eonsequeraces on countieks, you ma.ght ca].1 Pat
Ratliff. Pat laad this legiela~fora revfewed to cietermine
that it had no negative impa.cC on local, goversaments. Fat' s
telepkaoaae =urnber at Colorado Countisp, Inc. is 303-861-4076
and her home xaumber is 7ti9-635-5Z08a
~
~
Mr. George °Bttdft Gates
Page Four
1+ay 24' 19a4 M
Bud, I sincerely hope thi& 1.etter adeqtaag~ly addresees your
concems e I urould look forraard to diseussing th' a matter ira more detail wigh youe
'tIery truly Yours,
i
il Assaciates, Inc.
tPrdrew P o a y
esident
CC: Commissioner Johnnette Phillbps
Goenmissgog1er James Jo13€ason
County Attqrney James Fritze
County Managex JacSs I,ewi.s
l
I ~ I
I I
218 8noz~5 •3•~I•d•n w896:s0 ti6, 92 Adw
r.
Vae?°S EIEv]III'oY9HIlIlenQAl SQII'8$eg9C fPBaHo
.
~aWs Environmental trategic Plan
Draft . .
June 29 1994
~
. .
~o ao
M~ . ECONOW
^
(Draft) 'Vail's Environmental Strategic Plan
~ - Table of Contents
Vail's Environmental Strategic Plan
Table of Contents 1
Executive Summary 2
1. Introduction 3
2. State of the Environment 5
3. Trends That May Affect Vail ................................................................................................,.....10
4. Framework for Environmental Protection ............................................................................,.....13
5. Sustainable Land Use Regulation and Development ...............................................................14
6. Ecosystem Protection 16
7. Environmental Efficiency ......................................................................................................,....18
8. Environmental Management and Compliance 20
9. Implementation 21
10. Conclusion
25
Appendix 1 Environmental Success Stories 26
APPendix 2 Common Wildlife Species in Vail 27
.a
1
°(Draft) Van9°s Enveronmeenta9 Sgrategie P9an
Exlecut'lve summary
The Vail Environmental Strategic Plan provides a long-term vision to protect Vail's environ-
mental quality and defines a sustainable development strategy. The vision statement is the
cornerstone for the goals, and action plans that are identified in this plan. The "Vision"
describes the desired future environment for Vail that was developed from input at the Vail Envi-.
ronmental Odyssey Search Conference. This Vision statement is: .
"The Town of Vai9 wa81 be a 8eader un natural resource stewardship and. wall strive
4o attain environmentaE and economac sustairtabulity dvhile prornofing a s4rong sense
of coenmaanity.,,
This vision statement recognizes the link betuveen environmental quality and economic
development and that a balance is needed between these fiwo elements. It also recognizes the
need to ensure a healthy environment and economy for future generations while protecting histori-
cal and cultural values in the community. This Vision is supported by four goal areas:
Sus4ainable laead anse regulataon and econornic deveBopment: Ensure Town of Vail
regulations and policies relating to development are congruent with the carrying capacity
of the area's natural environment and man-made resources and encourage sustainable
, economic development.
Ecosysteeva Protecguoe¢: Protect the areas natural resources (air, water, soils, natural
habitat) and recognize that they are interconnected and interdependent.
Endaronmenta9 Effuciency: Improve efficiency in water, energy, and waste management in
businesses, residences, and in government.
Environrnenfal Management and Comp9iancee Ensure environmentaf compiiance
through proactive environmental management that will identify Vail as an environmental
leader.
This plan identifies specific actions and a time frame for those actions that will move Vail
towards its environmental vision. Together these action plans define Vail's sustainable develop-
ment strategy: This plan is also intended to be a dynamic plan that should be reviewed periodi-
cally to determine its effectiveness in dealing with environmental issues. This will require estab-
lishing a baseline for key environmental indicators to determine improvements, or lack thereof in
environmental quality. Adjustment in action plans may require amendments to this plan as the
need arises. This plan will help protect Vail's valuable natural resources, provide a proactive
management approach to environmental regulations, improve environmental education, encour-
age collaboration to solve common environmental problems, and help distinguish Vail as an ,
environmental leader.
2
,
(Draft) 'Vail's Environmental Stragegic Plan
1. INTRODUCTIOBV
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this planning process is to develop a long-term environmental work plan
that will address the needs of the community as well as legislative, regulatory, and technological
trends. A proactive environmental program will enable the Tawn of Vail to maintain and improve
environmental quality in the Vail Valley. Protecting our areas natural resources is also critical in
protecting our tourist based economy. A major reason why Vail has become an intemationally '
renowned resort is because of the area's pristine natural resources. In fact, proactive environmen-
tal management and education can be incorporated into Vail's marketing programs. In addiRion,
the U.S. Government and State of Colorado are increasingly requiring local communities to
implement or regulate environmental programs. Proactive environmental planning reduces
regulatory costs of compliance and can increase net income bv reducing waste. This helps make
Vail more economically competitive through cost savings and by marketing Vail as an environmen-
tally desirable place to visit and live.
Most importantly, a proactive environmental program will enable the Town to be a respon-
sible steward of the Valley's natural resources. By acting locally, the Vail community will help
address, in its own way, many global environmental issues e.g. global warming, acid rain, wa;ter
quality degradation, loss of sensitive habitat. Many of the world's global environmental problems
can only be adequately addressed through the collective efforts of local communities.
OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN
1) Develop a long-range environmental work-plan to protect and improve Vail's environ-
mental quality.
2) Improve cooperation and collaboration to better address environmental challenges.
3) Help idenfify Vail as a leader in environmental stewardsh ip/su stainable development.
4) Keep Vail environmentally proactive.
BACKGROUND:
Vail has gone through a dramatic transition from sheep farming in the 1930s and 1940s to
an internationally renowned ski resort. The two WWII veterans Pete Seibert and Bob Parker• that
' established the Vail ski resort in 1959, probably could not then imagine the growth that has taken
place in the Vail Valley. A first rate ski resort and the Valley's natural resources have been key
ingredients in the success of Vail. .
Growth in the valley has been dramatic in the last 20 years and has raised the concerii that
the Town needs to take proactive steps to protect the area's na.tural environment so that the
success of Vail would not endanger the "Golden Goose" i.e. thE; Valley's environment. This plan
is intended to provide a framework to protect and enhance the Vail Valley's natural resources and
to maintain the high degree of environmental quality that our residents and guests expect.
3
~~aftD VaBB°s Envnronmenta? Sga-ategflc Plaau
A major step in the development of this document was "Vail's Environmental Odyssey:
The IVext Generation" search conference. On October 8th and 9th in 1993, approximately 50
different stakeholders representing various businesses, interest groups, neighborhoods and area
governments met in Vail to discuss environmental issues the Town needs to address. The input
from this conference provided the foundation for this plan.
This is a long-range strategic plan and it is intended to be a dynamic process where actions
plans are monitored and revievued. Also changes in environmental trends should be monitored
annually. So it'is anticipated that this plan be revisited and adjusted as necessary to reflect
changes in community needs and external trends fhat may affect Vail. .
5~RUCTURE OF TG~~ ~LAN
This plan is centered around a vision statement that is supported by goal areas. This
plan is the culmination of a two day conference, significant public input, and an analysis of envi-
ronmental trends that may affect Vail in the future. This plan begins by discussing the state of
environmental quality in Vail and then analyzes trends that the community needs to be aware of in
developing an environmental vvork plan. Then four goal areas for environmental protection are
identified which support the "vision" statement. Finally specific actions are identified to implement
the goals of the plan.
The strategic planning process illustrated in Figure 9 is a dynamic process that begins
with public input and analyzing environmentally related trends in legislation, technology, and public
opinion. Then a vision, goals, and actions can be formulated and reviewed by decision makers
and stakeholders. Resources for completing actions must be identified to develop an achievable
action. Finally, the Town must commit to the implementation of the approved plan and monitor
implementation progress and effectiveness. As mentioned, trends and public opinion change over
time and the plan should be modified as appropriate.
Figure 1: Strategic Planning Process Vail Town Council
review and identify
priorities
Stakeholders identify
environmental issues
Begin Town of Vail
Strategic Develop Stakeholders review
Planning Scan of Vission, Goal, Actions and identify priorities
rocess environmental issues
(Local, Regional,
Global)
Related government
units review and
stablish Implement through Town Council identify pnorities
Review and •
performance incentives, Approve
standards and education,
monitor regulation, taxes, Determine costs and
im lementation coo ration. F Complete final resources to complete
plan
actions
4
(Drafft) 'Vail's Environmental Strategic Plan
2. STATE OF THEENVIRONMENT
Before a long range environmental work plan is defined, the current state of environmental
quality in Vail Valley should be discussed. Vail's natural resources and environmental quality have
_ changed over time as the Valley has been developed. HowevE:r, environmental quality in Vail is .
still high. The Vail Valley has a gold medal fishing stream, pristine mountain views, and provides
habitat to many species of plants and animals. A summary of_environmental programs that the
Town has implemented is discussed in Appendix 1. The followang is a description of known envi-
ronmentat baseline conditions in the Vail Valley. .
Historical Background: Prior to the 1900's, the Vail Walley consisted of wetlands and
meadows. The primary inhabitants were the Ute Indians that ppriodically camped in the area. In
the early 1900's miners and families began settling along the Gore Creek to mine silver, lead, and
zinc around Battle Mountain. After the Great Depression, sheep farming became the major
activity in the valley. In the late 1930's a state highway extended into the Gore Creek Valley
under the direction of Highway Engineer Charlie Vail. During WWII, the 10th Mountain Division
trained at Camp Hale 20'miles south of the Gore Valley. After the war two soldiers, Pete Seibert
and Bob Parker who had trained at Camp Hale, came back to establish a ski resort in Vail In
1959, a land use permit was issued to an investment group that had been formed for the Vail ski
resort. The Vail resort opened on-December 15, 1962 with 876 acres of skiable terrain making it
the third largest ski resort in the U.S.. In 1966, the Town of Veiil was incorporated and in 1969
Lionshead was annexed into the Town. In the 1970s, I-70 was built through the Vail Valley.
Geography/ Land Cover: The elevation of Vail is 8,150 feet and the summit of Vai! Moun-
tain is 11,450 feet. The Town is approximately 10 miles long and .5 to 1 mile wide. The heatviest
snowfall months are March and April, with the valley experiencing an average of 335 inches of
snow per year. There is a total of 3,360 acres in the Town of Vail, of which 29% of the land area or
977 acres are zoned open space. There are three commercial areas (Vail ViIlage, Lionshead„ and
West Vail) that consist of 155 acres or 4.6% of the land and single family residential accounts for
12 % of the land (Town of Vail Land Use Plan, 1989). Interstate 70 runs through the length of the
Town and covers 505 acres (15%) of lands. The remaining 4()% of the land area consists o-f
multifamily, public use, and unplatted parcels. Gore Creek is the other major linear feature that
runs through town and the only major water body within the town boundary. Its confluence with
the Eagfe River is just west of Town at Dowd Junction.
Demographics: The Town has grown from 400 people in the early 1970s to approxi-
mately 4,000 living in the Town of Vail in 1990 with over 2,709 people commuting into Vail daily
(U.S. Census, 1990). Approximately, 30,000 guests may be in Town during the peak of ski sea-
son.. Vail currently has approximately 6,100 housing units (i.e.units with a kitchen). The Town of
Vail estimates that it is 86% built out based on current zoning and the Vail Valley Consolidatecl
Water District has estimated that Vail can expect 5 to 10 percerit growth each year. Based on the
Town of Vail January 1994 Development Statistics report there is the potential for 1,345 additimnal
dwelling units in the Town of Vail. Current zoning would allow for an additional 853 single family or
duplex units, 237 multi family units, and 255 accommodation units.
Vegetation: Several vegetation studies have been completed in the White River National
Forest area. Hess and Wasser inventoried the White River National Forest in the 1980's and
compiled a report on the forest habitat types. These habitat types can be delineated by altitucie
and include Alpine Tundra (14,000 ft-11,200ft), Subalpine (11,200ft -10,000), Montane (10,000 ft-
7,500ft), and Semi-Arid (7,500 ft. - 5,200 ft). Within the Vail Valley the primary vegetative types
are Subatpine and Montane which are described below:
5
(Draft) Vanl°s ]Envie-onmental3grategic P?an
Subalainee Engelman spruce and subalpine fir are characteristic of the subalpine zone.
The Town of Vail is not within the Subalpine zone but the valley walls above Vail extend into
this vegetative zone. The following species are found in this zone:
Trees: Engelman spruce, Subalpine fir, Lodgepole pine, Blue spruce, ,4spen
Shrubs: Sagebrush, Booth's willovu, Vllolf's willow, Russet buffalowberry, Grouse
whortleberry ,
Grasses: Thurber fescue, Bluejoint reedgrass, Kobresia, Elksedge .
Montane: The Town of Vail is situated in the montane zone. The montane zone is charac- terized by Douglas firs and Aspen and less common Ponderosa pine. Alpine wetlands are
also common in the montane in the Valley bottoms. The following species are found in the
montane:
Trees: Douglas fir, Lodgepole pine, Blue spruce, Aspen , Cottonwood, Birch, and
Alder
Shrubs: Juniper, Pinyon pine, Sagebrush, Serviceberry, Rose, Mountain Mahogany,
Snowberry, Booth's wrillow, Sandbar willow, Drumond's willow, Alder, Dogwood,
Grouse V1/hortleberry
'
Grasses: Idaho fescue, Thurber fescue, Tufted hairgrass, Bluejoint reedgrass, Elk
sedge, Bluebunch wheatgrass
Habitat: The Vail Valley is home to many species of plants and animals. V1lhite River
National Forest as a whole provides suitable habitat for 307 vertebrate species (Table 9). The
distribution of the wildlife in and around the Town is primarily influenced by vegetation distribution
which is discussed above.
VNildlife Species common to the Vail area are typical of Montane areas in the Rockies.
Areas within the Vai1 Valley have also been designated as critical habitat for mule deer and elk.
Both deer and elk move. into the Valley from the West in the Spring and then move back west in
the Fall as snow pushes them to lower etevations. Raptors (birds of prey) also find habitat in the
Vail Valley. Gore Creek also provides productive aquatic habitat for fish, macro i nvertabrates, and
terrestrial wildlife. An estimate was made in 1980 that Gore Creek has 1000 trout per miie in the 4
mile Gold Medal section. .A Gold Medal fishery is a designation given by the Colorado Department
of iVatural Resources for excellent cold water fisheries. Common wildlife species often seen in
Vail are listed in Appendix 2.
Tabfe 1: Number of Vertebrate Species
Total Species Game Species
Mammals 72 13
Birds 202 27 Reptiles 11 -
Amphibians 5 -
Fish 17 _
Source: V1lhite River National Forest Management Plan, 1986
6
(Draft) Vail's Environmental Stragegic Plan
Water Quality/Quantity: Gore Creek is a major tributary of the Eagle River and is a
significant visual and natural resource for the Vail Valley. Water quality and quantity are inextrica-
bly linked. Both water quaiity and quantity have been effectedl as Vail has grown over the last 30
years. Water quality and quantity directly affect aquatic habitat. Currently, a portion of Gore Creek
is designated as a Gold Medal fishing stream.
The Town of Vail has analyzed historical water quality clata and has found that some tivater
quality parameters have improved over time and others have yotten worse. Statistical analysis
shows that concentrations of the following parameters:
Are greater below Vail than Have become worse over Have decreased in coricen-
a6ove (that is, water quality time: tration (improved) over time:
gets worse)
- Dissolved solids - Zinc
- Suspended solids - Phosphorus - Manganese
- Dissolved solids - Nitrate and nitrite - Copper
- Salts (conductivity) - Salts - Cadmium
- Phosphorus - Fecal coliform
- Ammonia
- Nitrate and nitrite
Based on available information, it appears that the prirriary reason for the degradationi in
the above mentioned water quality parameters is due to increased development and runoff. The
parameters that have improved over time are most likely due ta improvements made to the Vail
Valley Consolidated Water and Sanitation District treatment plant on Forest Road. Additional
biologicai monitoring is required to determine the significance of the water quality parameters that
have gotten worse over time. The Vail Valley Water District recently completed its Master Plan. At build out, the maxi-
mum daily demand is approximately 1,119 million gallons (mg) per year which can be compar-ed to
the 1,335 mg that the District has in water. rights. Therefore, projected demand at build-out vvill be
approximately 84% of the maximum amount allowable under the existing water rights owned by
the district. However, it should be acknowledged that the City of Denver owns approximately
45,000 acre feet of water rights in the Vail Valley that are seniar to the Districts. Denver has not
taken action to utilize these water righ.ts which would significanitly impact Vail. The Town along with
other western slope water users are actively participating in discussions with the Front Range that
are intended to identify alternatives to the use of these water rights. , There is significant concern that there is not adequate water throughout the year on the
Eagle River to protect aquatic habitat. The Colorado Water Conservation Board sets minimuim
- instream flow standards to protect trout habitat. These are bare minimum standards and fisfi kills
have occurred in the Eagle River at flows above minimum instream flow (Bureau of Reclamation,
1993). As the valley west of Vail becomes increasingly developed the pressure on the EagVe '
River will increase. Water quantity will become a major controlling factor in the future development
of the Eagle Valley west of Dowd Junction.
7
(gDraft) Vai1's Environmental Strategec P9an
GROUIVDWi4TER: The Town of Vail is dependent on ground water wells for drinking
water. There are seven drinking dvater vvells in the Town that the Vail Valley Consolidated lNater
District operates located near Gore Creek in the vicinity of the Golf Course and the West Vail
Matterhorn Road. These uvells are directly linked to water quality and quantity in Gore Creek since
they are alluvial. This basically means that water availability and quality from these wells is directly
related to quality and quantity in Gore Creek. Also the Town of Vail use of groundvvater for domes-
tic drinking water results in a depletion of surface water in the Gore Creek between the Vail golf
course wells and the Forest Rd. Treatment plan where there is considerable return flow back to
Gore Creek.
A0R QUALITYe P?ir quality in the Vail Valley is generally very good. However, during the
winter air quality is negatively impacted by particulates emitted from fireplaces and resuspension
from roads. The primary air quality parameter that has been a problem is particulate matter '
measured as PM10, particulate matter under 10 micrograms/ cubic meter. PM10 is used as a
particulate standard because particles at and smaller than this standard can be drawn into the
lungs and create serious health problems.
Two actions have been taken 4o mitigate this problem. The first action was implementing a
voluntary conversion program to encourage residents to convert older open hearth fireplaces to
"clean" burning technologies. This program has been successful in converting over 400 "dirty"
fireplaces and has resulted in a noticeable decline in "brown haze" days. The second action that
has been taken is using volcanic cinders for winter road applications instead of sand. Sand blown
up into the air from traffic resulted in 39% of the contribution to PM 10. Volcanic cinders are
heavier and less likely to become airborne.
SOL0 WASTE: Solid waste is a major issue in the Town of Vail and in Eagle County. In a
recent report prepared by the iVorthwest Colorado Council of Governments, Vail was identified as
one of the largest generators of solid waste on the west slope. A major source of solid waste is
reconstruction where an old home or building is demolished and a new structure is put in its place.
The existing Eagle County Landfilt opened in 1990 with an expected capacity of 25 years. How-
ever in 1993, the County estimated that the landfill had only 10 to 15 years of capacity remaining.
A successful grass-roots recycling program has been created in the County called We-Recycle.
We Recycle diverts approximately 4% of the waste stream.
HAZARDOUS WASSPE & MATERIALS: The Town of Vail does not have one large genera-
tor of hazardous waste although there are a number of small quantity generators. The
Town also has numerous underground and above ground storage tanks. The Fire Department
currently keeps a list of hazardous materials that are stored on private and public property. There
are a total of approximately 109 commercial sites with some form of hazardous material. The
Town also responds to an average of 15 hazardous or special waste spills or leaks a year. The
Town, under the leadership of the Fire Department, has adopted a incident command system so
that Town, State, and other local authorities can most effectively respond to hazardous material
releases and other emergency situations.
The Town also actively monitors progress on the clean-up of the Eagle Mine Superfund, site
located south of Minturn. The Eagle Mine is on the fVational Priority List (fVPL) and is a source of
heavy metal contamination in the Eagle River. Recent studies on fish habitat and water quality
data indicate that improvements have been made to reduce heavy metal contamination. However,
ongoing vigilance is necessary to ensure adequate progress in the Mine's clean-up.
8
(Draft) 'Vail's Envirornmental Stragegic Plan
OPEN SPACE PROTECTION: The Town of Vail adopted a Comprehensive Open Lands
Plan in 1994 that will protect sensitive natural areas in Vail. Orrer 51 parcels are recommended for
acquisition, conservation easements, or trail easements. Many of these parcels include riparian
areas, wetlands, and sensitive wildlife habitat. The Gore Creek is an important wildlife corridor for
small mammals and birds. A major objective of this plan was to acquire or protect as many
stream corridor parcels as possible.
DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS: The Town of Vail has a number plans, regulations and
policies that control development. The Zoning Code and DRB regulations control how and where
development may occur. The Land Use Plan, Vail ViIlage Master Plan, Streetscape Plan, and
Town of Vail Landscape Plan also directly affect the character of development and visual appear-
ance of Vail. 9
(Draft) V$el's Endna-onenenga9 3trategie P9an
~o TRENDs THAT MAY AFFECT VAiL
Identifying key trends that may affect Vail in the future provides an opportunity to ,
proactively address environmental issues. Trends analysis involves looking at historical and
current information and identifying trends that vvill continue into the future. Key trends that were
analyzed included legislative trends, public opinion polls, technology, and environmental quality
indicators. NV1/CCOG prepared a report for the Towrn that discusses specific trends that is a
supplement to the Environmental Strategic Plan. Broad trends that may directly affect environ-
mental quality in the Vail Valley are summarized belowr:
9) Pub6ic Opinion Pernains stronqfy in support of environmental protec40ora.
* 80 percent of all Americans consider themselves environmentalists. Approximately 10
percent of all Americans belong to an environmental group.
* People feel that environmental protection laws have not gone far enough. In 1990, 64 .
percent of the American public felt that environmental laws had not gone far enough. This
is significantly up from 1975 when only 31 % of the general public felt that environmental
lavvs had not gone far enough.
' 71 % of people feel that too little is being spent on protecting the environment. Public
opinion surveys consistently show that people are willing to spend more on improved
environmental quality. This trend has gained momentum since 1975 when only 48% of the
. public felt that too little was being spent on environmental protection.
~ Surveys also indicate that consumers would be uvilling to pay up to 20 percent more if
purchasing an environmentally friendly product.
° 74 percent of P?mericans are willing to accept slower economic growth for a cleaner
environment.
° Residents in Eagle County and Vail have consistently said protecting environmental
quality and open lands are high priorities through public opinion surveys and public meet-
ings.
2) Increased s4ate and 9oca9 godernrnent involvement un environmental prograrns
Local government has become more involved in environmental issues for tvvo reasons; (1)
the federal government imposed responsibilities on them and (2) town councils have
reacted to public opinion to enact their own environmental laws. However, local govern-
ments are atso increasingly finding difficulties in trying to comply with federal regulatory
obligations without supporting funding.
10
(IDraft) Wail's Environmental Strategii~ Plan
3) The number of environmental laws has increased dramaticaily since NEPA. There has been a dramatic increase in the number of environmental laws since the pas-
sage of the National Environmental Policy Act in 1970. This trend appears to be continu-
ing. Approximately 460 environmental protection bills were introduced in the 102nd Con-
gress. This is almost a 25 percent increase from the 101st Congress when
373 bills where introduced. However, there is an increasing call to consolidate environmen- .
tal laws and eliminate contradictions and overlaps. The EPA,is attempting to do this
through their regulatory authority but this will be difficult until Congress consolidates envi-
ronmental committees and laws.
4) Environmental Law Enforcement increased significantly over the last twenty years.
The EPA and Department of Justice have significantly increased enforcement action in
the last twenty years. Belween 1989-1991, EPA assessed criminal and civil penatties,
of $201 million where as between the years of 1972 and 1988(16 years) only $166 mullion
in penaities was collected. Locatly, the 5th Judicial District has initiated an environmerital
law enforcement task force to aggressively prosecute emvironmental violations.
5) There is an increasing emphasis on pollution prevention and efficiency.
Federal legislative approaches are moving away from the strategy of the "cork" in whirh
they attempted to stop pollution at the "end of the pipe." This approach has proven to be
extremely expensive. Carol Browner, EPAAdministratar, plans to focus
greater effort and funding on poltution prevention. This approach is aimed at eliminating
the creation of pollution. Since pollution from industry often comes from inefficiencies iin the production process, pollution prevention has become attractive to industry. Polluters
are finding large long-term cost,savings in modifying their production process to eliminate
waste and improve efficiency. Compliance, disposal, and raw material costs for produc-
tion can be significantly reduced through pollution prevention strategies.
6) Increased emphasis on iden4ifying environmental indicators.
The EPA and environmental scientists are increasingly spending more resources identifying
key environmental indicators in natural systems that help determine the "health" of a natu-
ral system. This approach considers how different elements of an ecosystem interact and
how different types of pollution impact natural systems.
7) Federal government implements systems (Holistic) management approach.
The concept of managing systems instead of individual environmental components is
becoming increasingly popular in Congress, the EPA, and other land management agen-
cies. The Forest Service, along with other Federal Agencies, have adopted an ecosystem
management approach. It is also anticipated that when the Clean Water Act is reautho-
rized in the next year, watershed management will be a critical element in the law requiring
water quality and quantity planning based on a systems approach. A systems approa.ch
will also most likely be adopted in the reauthorization off the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). ESA has been criticized for not protecting natural systems, but instead proteGting
individual species when in fact their existence is at a crqtical point due to a loss of habutat.
11
(Draft) Van9°s Eneic-onmentafl Strategec ~~an
- 8) Rapid growth un moanntaan sta$es wu91 stra0n resources.
Significant population growth is expected to continue into the next five years. People
are moving from the coasts to mountain states to find a better quality of life and escape
urban centers. Improvements in telecommunication wrill increasingly allowr people to work
away from urban centers. Eagle County has grown significantly over the past 20 years
and continues to grow rapidly. There has been a 90% increase in the number of school
age children since 1980. Total population in Eagle County has grown from 7,498 in 1970
to 27,671 in 1990, an increase of 269%. Colorado as a whole is one of the fastest growing
states in the United States.
9) Market approaches to envaPonmental reglulation wil8 be ancreasing9y usede
The Bush Administration began using market incentives to control pollution with the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendment which established a market for major components of acid rain.
Companies now pay for tons of sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide (major pollutants that
cause acid rain) that they may emit through 4he Chicago Board of Trade. The Clinton
administration has indicated a desire to maker greater use of economic incentives and
market forces in environmental programs. Use of "Feebate" systems are discussed fre-
quently (charging a surcharge to polluters and using those funds as a financial incentive for
non-polluters).
12
(Draft) Vail's Environmental Strategic Plan
4. FRAl1AEWORK FOR ENVIRONIlIIEIVTAL PROTECTION
At the October, 1993 Vail Environmental Odyssey's Search Conference participants de-
scribed the desirable future they would like to see for Vail's environment and developed action
areas that needed to be addressed to attain Vail's desirable future. The participants description of
Vail's desirable future was used to develop a vision statement. The Vail Environmental Vsion
provides the direction for environmental programs. This statennent recognizes the link between
environmental quality and economic development and that a balance is needed between these
two elements. It also recognizes the need to maintain a healthy environment and economy for
future generations. The goals,mentioned below provide a framework to attain Vail's environmen-
tal vision:
Vail's Environrnental Visian
"The Town of Vail will be a leader in natural resource stewardship and will strive
to attain environmental and economic sustainability while promoting a strong sense
of community."
A total of 8 action areas were identified at the Search Confererice that included:
A. Become an environmental leader E. Maintain a relation of economic and environ-
B. Redefine development philosophy mental consideration in growth.
F. Protect open space
C. Create a stronger sense of community G. Improve Lnvironmental efficiency
D. Maintain and improve the ecosystem
H. Improve rnass transit and non-motorized
transportation.
The specific actions for each area were reviewed and similarities between areas were
identified to consolidate actions to create four major goal areas for the plan. These four goal
areas are:
Sustainable.land use reguBation and ecanomic development: Ensure
Town of Vail regulations and policies relating to development are congruent
with the carrying capacity of the area's natural environment and man-made
resources and encourage sustainable economic development.
. Ecosystem Protection: Protect the areas natural resources (air, water, soils, and natural
habitat) and recognize that they are interconnected and interdependent.
Environmental Efficiency: Improve efficiency in water, energy, and waste management in
businesses, residences, and in government.
Environmental Management and Compliance: Ensure environmental compliance
through proactive environmental management that will identify Vail as an environmental
leader.
Each of these goal areas supports Vail's environmental vision and is supported by action plans
and resources. The next four chapters will discuss each of the.se goal areas in detail. .
13
(Drafft) Vael°s Enviroaemental Strategic PRan
~o - USTAINABLE LAND 0 USEREGuLATio~ AN - D
DEVELOPMENT
BACKGROUND:
Sustainable development encompasses a number of issues inciuding; restating the Town's
development philosophy, improving residents and guests sense of community, and balancing
environmental protection and economic development. Sustainable developrrient is. a planning methodology that promotes development that is sensitive to fhe natural environment
and the character of the community. Sustainable development can be defined as "development
that meets the needs and aspirations of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations (i.e., humans and other species) to meet their own nesds." Sustainable development
involves understanding where sensitive natural resources are and how elemenis (e.g., vegetation,
animals, geology, water quality, air quality) of a natural system are interconnected. By under-
standing the carrying capacity of natural and man-made systems, planners can identify opportuni-
ties for development that are compatible with the natural environment.
Carrying capacity in a natural system can be compared to carrying capacity on a man-
made system such as an elevator. If the carrying capacity is 10 people for an elevator and 12
people get in - the elevator may not break but it may not work as efficiently. However, if 20
people squeezed in, there is a chance that the cables might break writhout warning. Carrying
capacity is that point where the additional use of a resource results in a degraded condition. If
people can develop without exceeding carrying capacities for nafural and man-made resources
then they are living sustainably.
In practical terms, sustainable development means ensuring that development does not
exceed carrying capacity, e.g., a development does not permanently impact wetlands, the vegeta-
tive cover around streams and lakes, or displace wildlife. In order to create a sustainabte com-
munity, the Town will also inevitably need to reduce waste generation, minimize energy and
water usage, as well as make sure development does not exceed the ability to provide water,
power, sewage treatment, and other public services without deteriorating environmental quality.
Determining carrying capacity involves determining wrhat the natural and man-made resources can
accommodate without being permanently degraded. By staying within the communities carrying
capacity, the Town will act as a gtobal partner with other communities to help address the world's
environmental concerns. By acting locally, the Town becomes part of the solution in solving global
environmental problems.
OBJECTIVES:
Ensure development does not exceed carrying capacity for key human and natural re-
, sources through implementation of environmental programs and policies.
` Develop a transportation system that minimizes impacts to natural and man-made
resources.
• Inform residents and businesses on strategies to foster environmental sfewardship.
* Promote and recognize sustainable economic development and environmental (eco)
tourism (e.g., interpretive hiking, environmental education on Vail Mountain).
14
(Draft) Vail's Envirommental Strategic: Plan
Instill a strong sense of community for residents through the implementation of envirnn- "
mental programs.
ACTIONS:
1) Through an environmental assessment of the community, determine key resources that
need defined carrying capacities. The Town then needs to identify those carrying capaci-
ties and develop strategies for staying within. those limits. The Town will need to identify
mitigation strategies if carrying capacity has been exceeded for critical man-made or natu-
ral resources.
2) Develop incentives to promote sustainable .
economic development in Vail. '
~
oura e
3
busines
s
es nd ov rmmen
) Enc 9 a g e t to
~o~~:~
adopt the Valdez principles through education ~
- i~i... sk[...
and incentives. . t
~a.- ...'.i..
Review international
4
) , national, and state ~
olicies for sustainable v I :~~s:::~ii
p de e opment and as ~?!;:::::.>:<s~
a ropri ::~;~?c~i~±~.;~~i~i~
PP ate draft local regulations/polices that
~
support them. ~
~i~~
5) ImPlement the Maurie Nottingham Environ- t:<:<;:
.
:;:~.;:e;*.+~;;?;;;?~;~i>:,?5;~::;i:i:it;?i:i::i;:;?::;:.:;.:;.;:•;:.::.:::>;:;::::;::;:::i2:::;:::i
:~:j;:; i;~;; ~::J:a::::~:?.~:>+:.,a:a•'.~.:,~::>:.::; _:~::;::~:;>:~::~::~::~>x•;r::~:;:~>::~>:;::<:a:a
mental Quality Award to recognize businesses
and individuals that demonstrate environmental
leadership.
6) Develop regulations, if necessary, to help ensure development does not exceed cariying
capacity for human or natural resources and is consistent with the community's mountain
character. This action would include,the following tasks:
a. Review Design Review Board guidelines for buildings and landscaping to
ensure the design principles are.environmenYally sound.
' b. Reevaluate the criteria and need for the Hillside Residential District.
c. Determine if a special zone district is needed to protect riparian areas around
Gore Creek and its tributaries.
d. Update the Vail Land Use Plan
e. Complete text changes to the Agriculture Open Space and Greenbelt
Natural Open Space zone districts as well as review parcel zoning and make
necessary rezoning changes to ensure effective protection of sensitive natural
open spaces.
7) Utilize carrying capacity thresholds when reviewing development applications.
8) Review the Inter-Mountain Transportation Plan and determine how the Town of Vail
should assist in the implementation of this plan. This plan identifies actions to improve
mass transit, cycling, and pedestrian transportation in the Inter-Mountain Transportatioln
Region. This region extends from Dillon to Parachute along the I-70 corridor and reaches
south to Aspen and Leadville. The estimated cost to implement the high priority actions is
$350 million. The Town of Vail would benefit significantly by the proposed rail and bus
connections along the I-70 and Highway 24 corridors.
15
(Draft) Vain?°s EnvuronmentaIl Strategnc Plaue
6. ECOSYSTEM"r'ROTECTION
BACKGROUNDe
Ecosystem protection provides a holistic approach to resource management. An ecosys-
tem can be defined as a community of independent organisms and the abiotic (nonliving) envi-
ronment they inhabit and interact writh in a geographic area. ~
Ecosystem management involves maintaining a healthy natural and man made system.
Traditionally, environmental regulations have focused on key problem areas such as a major point
source of water pollution or trying to save an endangered species in an area. Trying to
mitigate the symptoms of environmental degradation has led to reacting to major environmental
problems rather than trying to prevent them in the first place. Environmenfial scientists and policy
makers now see that ecosystem management is a more effective method of protecting the envi-
ronment.
The Town of Vail is located within a sensitive ecosystem that provides critical habitat to a
number of terrestrial and aquatic species. The water quality and air quality are also sensitive to
development. Since an ecosystem can consist of thousands of species, geologic and soil condi-
tions, water resources, and air quality, it is essential to determine key elements of an ecosystem
that reflect the general "health" of a natural system. For instance, a healthy
rainbow trout population can be an effective indicator of good water quality. Therefore it is not
necessary to measure every organism in an ecosystem to protect it, although it is necessary to
carefully determine "indicator" measurements and thresholds for those measurements. It should
also be acknowledged that no one governmental entity can protect an ecosystem, since an eco-
system boundary does not conform to political boundaries. Therefore, collaboration among gov-
ernmental entities and private property owners in a ecosystem is necessary to ensure effective
protection.
oBJEcTWEs:
" Determine key thresholds for air quality, water quality, and protection of critical habitat in
and around the Town of Vail as they relate to development or human induced stress.
' Ensure a sustainable trout population in the Gore Creek.
" Identify and protect sensitive natural areas e.g. wetlands, riparian areas, and critical
habitat, wellhead protection areas, aquifer recharge areas
* Reduce PM10 levels through uvood fireplace conversions and best management
practices (e.g. volcanic cinders, regular street sweeping) of winter road applications.
16
F
(Draft) Vail's Envirornmental Strategic Plan
ACTIONS:
1) Conduct an environmental assessment of the Town of Vail. This study would identify
environmental risks (hazardous materials storage) and impacts in the Town. It would also provide
recommendations to improve efficiency in the use of natural resources. The assessment will also
help identify key carrying capacity thresholds for the use of natural resources and public services.
A major benefit of this assessment would' be to establish a baveline for environmental quality by
which future environmental- programs could be measured. It would also help identify the need for
new regulations or modifications to existing regulations.
2) Implement the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. The action plan may need to be
modified after the environmental assessment of the community is completed.
3) Implement an information program for residents, guests, and students to improve the
communities understanding of our ecosystem. ,
4) Evaluate existing policies to determine if changes are required or whether new polices
are needed to protect the ecosystem. This may include:
a) controls on development to protect sensitdve natural areas
b) landscape requirements to minimize water consumption, improve wildlife
habitat, and to protect mature trees.
c) air quality regulations
d) regulations/policies to reduce impacts frorn nonpoint source contribution.
e) water conservation
f) wellhead protection program to prevent impacts to groundwater
wells.
5) Conduct a habitat study of the Gore Creek to determine species composition and
number. This study would also recommend specific strategies to improve habitat in the Gore
Creek.
6) Complete an urban wildlife study for Vail which woulcl utilize the information in the Open
Lands Plan. This study would foeus on identifying and improving wildlife corridors and educating
residents on living in a mountain community where individuals may come in close contact witti
wildlife. Another aspect of this program should be an effort to encourage residents to use bear
propf garbage cans to reduce conflicts with Black Bears.
7) Work with the White River Forest Service and the County to promofe an Ecosystem
Approach to forest and land management.
8) Develop a tree and vegetation protection program that respects private property rights
and ensures the protection of valuable trees and other vegetatwon critical for wildlife habitat arid
aesthetics.
9) Continue the annual Trees For Vail event and implementing the Town of Vail Landscape
Plan.
17
. ,
,
(Draft) VaeB's EnvironmengaH Stragegic Plan.
7. ENvsRoNMENTALEFFeciENcY
BACKGROUND
This goal area focuses on resource conservation in the Town of Vail in three areas: energy,
water, and waste management. Resource conservation is an integcal component in a sustainable
community. It reduces the amount of nonrenewable resources that are required to supply a com-
munity and it reduces the amount of waste generated that must be disposed or emitted into the
environment. ~BJECTBVES: 1) Reduce total energy consumption in the Town of Vail by 10% by the year 2000.
2) Reduce per capita water consumption by 15% by the year 2000.
3) Develop a comprehensive waste management program that will reduce the disposal of
waste by 30% within the Town of Vail by 2000 and reduce toxicity in the waste stream.
ACT90NS:
1) Establish a baseline in 1994 for water conservation, energy conservation, and waste
production so that the implementation of the above mentioned objectives can be measured. 2) Develop a comprehensive energy consenration program through the following methods:
A) Education on energy saving devices and building techniques.
B) Provide energy audits for residences and buildings to determine the most cost
effective means of reducing energy consumption.
C) Provide tours of energy efficient model homes.
D) Create incentives for implementing energy conservation techniques
E) Encourage the use of solar and other energy saving technologies
F) Create or change Town regulations to mandate energy consenration in
building practices.
G) Expand mass transit to reduce gas consumption
H) Develop and distribute a list of energy conserving appliances that can be pur-
chased in the area.
18
a
(Draft) Vail's Envirornmental Strategic Plan
3) Work with the Vail Valley Consolidated Water District to determine water use patterns
and then develop a water conservation report which will recorrimend water conservation tech-
niques that might include:
A) Education on water conservation.
B) Working with home and business owners to recommend the most cost
effective methods for water conservation.
- C) Incentives for imptementing water conservation techniques
D) Tours of model homes or buildings that use varater conservation technology.
E) Changes in regulations to reduce water consumption (e.g. low water.
landscaping requirements, building codes on low flow toilets and shower heads)
F) Developing and distributing a list of water saving products. -
4) Imp{ement an integrated solid waste management program for the Town of Vail that will
utilize the following hierarchy 1) reduce, 2) reuse, 3) and recycle. The following will be compo-
nents of this program:
A) Use the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments solid waste study for Eagle County
to determine waste stream characteristics in the Town af Vail.
B) Develop an educational program and incentives to encourage individuals and
businesses to reduce, reuse, and recycle.
C) Through education and incentives encourage food service establishments to buy
recycled materials, use reusable products, and to implement recycling.
D) Develop programs or policies to reduce the generation of cornstruction waste.
E) Develop a composting program to divert yard,waste from the landfill.
F) Work with We-Recycle to increase recycling rates to 30% 6y 2000. ,
G) Encourage users of hazardous materials through education and incentives to use less
toxic products and when they do use hazardous materials to safely store and dispose of
them. H) Develop a program to encourage households to use "clean" alternatives to
household hazardous waste generating products (e.g. pesticides, herbicides,
cleaners) .
19
/
(Draft) Vael'S E69V&I'Oi1meB9ga1 ?S't9'a$egiC PBaHH
S. NVIR NiVIENT~~ MANAGEIIAENT AN
COMPUANCE
BAcKGROUNDe
This goal area is focused on ensuring the Touvn of Vail is a leader in environmental manage-
ment and compliance. The number of environmental regulations that municipalities
must comply with continues to increase significantly. The Town of Vail wants to go one step beyond compliance and be proactive to potentially new environmental regulations that are on the horizon.
Through a program of proactive environmental management, Vail will become a recognized leader •
in environmental quality.
OBJECTO!/ES:
1) Develop a proactive environmental management program that will address ever increas-
ingly stringent environmental regulations.
2) Have the Town of Vail recognized as an environmental leader through implementation of
environmental programs.
ACTBONS:
1) Conduct an environmental review of towrn facilities and programs to ensure compliance\
with federal, state, and local environmental regulations. This review will recommend specific action
that the Town needs to take to reduce natural resource consumption and environmental risk.
2) Identify sources of hazardous materials in the Town and recommend clean alternatives, if
available, and provide property owners with information on proper handling and disposal of hazard-
ous materials.
3) Implement a training program for Town staff and other key agencies to effectively respond
to hazardous waste incidents.
4) Identify locations of all underground and above ground storage tanks and provide
recommendations to reduce environmental risk.
5) Identify grants for environmental programs and actively seek out environmental
awards that Vail might be eligible.
6) Evaluate whether a new Environmental Commission is required to provide guidance
for Town environmental programs.
7) Host environmental conferences and forums to inform residents of environmental issues and to help recognize Vail as an environmental leader.
8) Provide environmental educational opportunities, e.g. summer camp for high school
students.
9) Develop a means to inform business and general contractors about new Federal and
State of Colorado environmental regulations (e.g. notification of asbestos abatement).
20
;
(Draft) Vail's Environunental Strategic Plan
g. IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of this plan will require time, money, people, and cooperation among stakeholders
in the community. Full implementation will also require cooperation from other governmental
entities since environmental issues do not stop at political boundaries. The objective of this sec-
tion is to summarize the actions stated in the four goal areas, estimate costs, set priorities, and
identify stakeholders that are needed to implement the actions. It should be recognized that..
several actions apply to two or more goal areas. For example the environmental assessment
discussed in the "sustainable development" goal area is also an
action for "ecosystem protection." .
COSTS
The implementation of this plan is based on a four year action plan. Many of the programs
or policies implemented in this four year period will be ongoing in nature and will require monitor-
ing. Table 3 lists the associated costs that are estimated for each year of the implementatiori
plan. These costs reflect the actions that are described in Table 4. _
Table 3: Implementation Costs ,
Year Cost 1994 $19,000 (Town of Vail environmental budget for 1994 is $19,000)
1995 $213,000 (includes revision of land use plan)
1996 $21,000
1997 $36,000
TOTAL $271,000
Notes:a) Costs exclude open lands plan costs of $4.5 million payed from Real Estate Transfer
Tax.
b) Costs exclude mass transit costs ($90- $350 million) since implementation schedule still
needs to be defined by Inter-Mountain Planning Region.
ACTION PLAN
Table 4 summarizes the major-actions and how they will be implemented. Each action
may apply to several goal areas. The third column lists the applicable goal areas that apply to
each action. Action costs are a rough estimates and may be shared by several stakeholders.
This plan is intended to provide a work program for the Town of Vail and identify other stakeholders
to participate in implementation. This plan does not obligate them in any way to participate in this
plan. However, this will give the Town direction in terms of other stakeholders it should encourage
to participate in this plan's implementation. '
21
; -
(Draft) Vael°s I~nvironmental Sta-ategic Plan
Table 4: Acteon PIan
Start Aetion Appliwble Time Estimated CosV Swkoholdarm
Year Goal(s) Requiremerrt StattTime
Ongoing Work with the USFS 8 Courrty to 2 prgoing 40 Fqursyear TOV. USFS, White Fiiver Forest
implemeM ecosystem management
Ongoing Seek oul environmerrtal awart)s and grarns 4 Orpoing 120 hours statt time TOV, busirases, d residents
a year
1994 Completa Strategic Plan AII 1 year $B,OOOforplan TOV, communiry, businesess,
other govemmental agencies
1994 Fireplace Cornersion Program 2 120 hours/ g2,000 for TOV, Eagle County. Utilhies,
enmiely promotion Retaiwrs, Bardcs
1994 Complete Stormwater Discharge Plan 284 6 months $4,000 to complate TOV 8 NWCCOG
Pla^
1994 Complete Open Land Zone Distria 182 3 morrths 80 hours staH time TOV 8 residenis
changes
1994 Determine baseline for energy usage, 3 1 morrth 40 hours staff time TOV, Holy Cross. Public Service, .
water usage, and waste generazbn Vail Vallay Consolidated Water
Dist.
1994 Complete ernironmernal audit of Tovm 4 1 morrth $5,000 audit + TOV
tacilities compliar" cost
1994• Imploment Open Lands Plan 2 4 years $4.5 mil. Council 8 Staff
1997 .
1995 Propare Trea/Vegatation Care Ordanance 2 3 morrths $5,000 for imentory Vail Alpine Garden, TOV
of traes 8policy
1995 Errvironmemal Assessmem (EA) 18284 1 year $15,000 for EA Tawn ot Vail Business Owners
1995 Develop a water conservation p/ogram 183 1 year ;8,000 tor plan TOV, Water District, NWCCOG
1995 Evaluata nood ta create an onvironmomal 4 2 morrths 30 Faurs stafl time Council. PEC, 8 staff
commissan
1995 Begin implemerrting recommentlations 2 6 morrths $25,000 to begin TOV
from Stormwator Discharga Plan to implementatan
improve water qualiry in the Gore
1995 Evaluate Devebpment relazed policios, i.a. 182 1 year $160.000 for Lard Com Dev 8 public
revise Land Use Plan. DRB rags, zoning Use plan g
regs.
signHicarrt statt time
1996 Cominue ravisirg DRB and zonirg 182 7 year 200 hours staff time Com Dev 8 pubiic
ragula[ions
1996 Develop InceMives to promote sustainable 1 6 mornhs $2,000 for Town of Vail Prnvate Sector
economic devebpment promotbn
1996 Education to promote sustainable 183 Orgoing g3000year TOV. Rocky Mt Insittute, Building
developmern practices
Communiry.
1996 Education on araa ecoystem 782 Ongoing $1000yoar Nature Cemer, A¢pine Gardens,
TOV, Schools
1996 Host annual ernironmental symposium 4 Mnually 100 hours staff time Vail Symposium, TOV
1996 Review implementation of Irrter-Mourrtain 1 10 years + $90,000,000 Irrter-Mountain Planning Region 8
Transponation. Plan budgeted for region CDOT and U.S. DOT 1996 Evaluate ernironmerrtal regulazions to 182 6 morrths 200 hours staN time TOV & public
determine their adequacy
1996 Implemen[ a habitat improvemern program 2 2 years $15.000 tor study Trout Unlimitad, DOW, TOV
for Gore Creek and wildlile corridors and to begin
' improvemeMs
1997 Conduct a energy audil oi communhy and i&3 lyear $10.000 for plan TOV. Holy Cross. Pubtic Service,
develop energy conservation strategies Rocky Mt Institute, Builders
1997 • Develop an Imergrated Waste 183 1 year $15.000 forplan TOV. We Recycle, BFI.
Management Program NWCCOG
1997 Develop a hazardous material assislance 4 a morrths $10.000 Fire Dept. and Errv. Health
program
1997 ImplemeM a model home show to 3 4 morrths $1,000 for TOV, Homabuilders Assoc. Board
demonsiate energy, water, and natural promotion of Realators
resource conservatan
Note: This Table reflects estimated costs
:.:.u~i#i~?eti~l
;
. . . .
22
~
(Draft) dail's Environmental Strategic Plan
FINANCIIVG IMPLEMENTATION
Currently the Town funds environmental programs at approximately $20,000 per year and
has two staff members to work on environmental programs anci carry out environmental health
inspections. The plan will require creative methods to fully implement this program. Additional
sources of funding that could be used include:
US EPA Grants: The Environmental Protection AgencN has over a 100 different grants
where a municipality or state may apply to obtain funding for environmental programs. The Town
has obtained over $20,000 in EPA grants through Northwest Colorado Council of Governments to
help fund the stormwater discharge study. Many EPA grants require matching funding and a
significant amount of work to comptete the grant application. Never= the-less this funding source
should be pursued to augment Town funds.
Technical Assistance: Ths Nor Nest Colorado Council of Governments awards three
technical assistance grants a year for planning projects. The Town was awarded a technical
assistance grant to identify environmental trends that may affect Vail in the future. It is recom-
mended that the Town continue to pursue these grants from NWCCOG for planning related envi- ,
ronmental projects. Also other Federal and quasi public agencies provide technical assistance to
communities. For instance, the National Park Service has a technical assista.nce grant for rivE;r
and stream management. The National Heritage Program can provide assistance in identifying
sensitive natural areas. Another organization that could provide technical services to the Town is
the Sustainable Futures Society. The Sustainable Futures Society consists of professors and
other environmental professionals can assist with community environmental projects. The State of
Colorado can also provide technical assistance through the Office of Business Development and
the Office of Energy Conservation.
Land Trusts: Organizations like the fVature Conservancy or Colorado Open Lands carn
help communities cost-effectively protect environmentally sensitive open space. These types
of organizations can have significant financial backing and experience in protecting natural re-
sources.
Volunteer Community Support: Community volunteers could be used on many of the
recommendations. For instance local naturalists could assist with habitat studies. We-Recycle
could provide valuable assistance in the development of a intecirated solid waste program. The
real estate community could possibly assist with open,houses for energy efficient homes.
Volunteer Environmental Educators: Environmental education is a key component of i:his
plan. Educational programs are needed for schools, businesses, and the general public. The Vail
Valley has many individuals that have significant knowledge and interest in environmental issues.
The Town and other stakeholders may finance the creation of educational programs but could use
volunteers to inform residents and businesses on various environmental topics mentioned in this
plan.
Impact Fees: A possible source of revenue that has been used in other communities is to
create a development impact fee to fund certain types of environmental projects. For instance an
impact fee coutd be established for new development that would help create a fund for habitat
improvement and tree replanting.
23
-
(Draft) VaIl?'s Environmenta9 3trategfc P?an
° Private/Public Partnerships: Collaborative efforts between the Town and other interested
stakeholders should be in integral component of implementing this plan. Organizations that have
an environmental interest should be approached to cooperatively implement programs. For in-
stance both Vail Associates and the Vail P?Ipine Gardens have expressed an interest in providing
environmental education. The Town has wrorked with the County, Fireplace retailers, and Public
Service to develop an incentive program to encourage property owners to converf "dirty" burning
fireplaces to clean burning "state of the art" units. The Town should actively seek other interested
stake holders to collaborate with on environmental programs.
Universities: Universities and colleges are also sources of technical assistance. Most
universities have natural resource or environmental science programs with Graduate students that
might be utifized to work on projects. Working with graduate students on environmental project
can provide the Tovvn with free or inexpensive labor while providing the student an opportuniry to complete thesis or graduate course work.
Extend Time Frame: The annual cost for implementing the action plan could be reduced by
extending the implementation schedule.
24
~
(Draft) Vail's Environmental Strategic Plan
10. CoNCLvsioN
The Vail Environmental Strategic Plan defines a direction to make Vail an environmental
leader. Proactive environmental management and stewardship are essential in maintaining the .
natural mountain character of Vail. Protecting the natural character of Vail is also essential to
ensure long-term economic vitality since the valley's natural resources are a key element in the
economic success of Vail.
This Plan defines a vision statement that the Town wiN strive to obtain. To reach this uision
four goal areas have been defined and actions plans where developed to address these goals.
The four goal areas cover a comprehensive list of environmental issues from air quality protection
to environmentally sound design principles. The plan also defines a implementation plan wii:h
estimated costs to provide a practical means of implementing this plan.
This plan provides a framework for environmental management, education, and qualiiy
in the Town of Vail. Benefits of this plan's implementation include:
1) Providing a long-range environmental workplan to protect and improve Vail's environ-
ment which has wide support in the community.
_ 2) Improving cooperation and collaboration with other stakeholders on environmental
programs.
3) Reconizing Vail as a leader in environmental stewardship '
4) Improving fhe sense of community by active participation in the implementation of this
plan by residents, businesses, interest groups, and government.
4) Keeping Vail environmentally proactive and reducing compliance costs
Implementation of the four year action plan will allow these benefits to be realized. Many of
the actions outlined in Table 4 will also require ongoing support. This plan provides a direction for
attaining the Town's environmental vision and is also dynamic so that actions can be modifieci to
adjust for changes in trends and public concerns.- Allonitoring implementation will also be required
to ensure effectiveness.
Through this strategic planning process, the Town of Vail will set a standard for enviroii-
mental protection and natural resource stewardship. The Town will join other communities in
helping to solve global environmental challenges through local actions. Thinking globally ancl
acting locally has been a key ingredient in making Vail an international leader as a ski resort and
will also help distinguish Vail as an environmental leader.
25
i
(Draff~) Vaal°s Eneironmeaatal Strategic P9a¢a
0
Appendox 9
Envaronmen$a9 Success Stories
* In 1980 the Town of Vail established a 1% Real Estate Transfer Tax to acquire and Protect open
space in the Town of Vail.
" In 1989 V1/e Recycle was established as a not-for-profit company to provide recycling services to
Eagle County. This has been a grass roots effort in Eagle County that know diverts approximately
4% of the vvaste stream.
" In 1990, the Town of Vail implemented regulations that prohibited open hearth fireplaces from
being built in the Town of Vail. The Town also initiated a incentive program to convert existing dirty
burning fireplaces to clean burning fireplaces. To date over 400 voluntary conversions have
occurred and the brown haze problem in the Town has been significantly reduced.
" In 1992 the Towrn initiated a Stormwater Discharge program to reduce uvater quality impacts from
runoff. 1lVith the assEStance of NWCCOG the Town has completed a comprehensive survey of
water quality impacts and now working on developing programs to mitigate nonpoint sources of
wrater quality impacts.
° In 1993, the Touvn completed a biological sunrey of the Vail Valley with the assistance of the
National Heritage Program which identified sensitive natural areas in the Town that should be
protected.
° In 1993 the Vail Symposium was focused on healthy communities which in large part discussed
environmental issues. The Director of the United IVations Environmental Program was a speaker
at this symposium.
* In 1993 the Town of Vail created the Maurie fVottingham Environmental Quality Award to recog-
nize outstanding environmental programs or efforts in the community.
In 1994 the Town of Vail adopted a comprehensive Open Lands Plan that laid out a 4 year action
plan to acquire or protect sensitive natural areas and areas needed for outdoor recreatian.
" In 1992, the Trees for Vail program was initiated. This is an annual volunteer event in the sum-
mer to plant trees in the Town of Vail.
* The Town of Vail has adopted and begun implementation of a landscape plan to improve vegeta-
tive cover in public areas.
26
(Draft) Vail's Envirornuyental Strategic Plan
~
APPENDIX 2
Common Wildlife Species in Vail
SPECIES SCIEPdTIFlC NAME SENSI11VfTY TO HABRAT
LOSS AND HUAAAN
ACT1VfTV
AAAAAMALS
Black bear Ursus americgnus SensiOVe
Elk Cervus elaphus Sensitlve
Mule deer Odocoileus hemonius Sensifive
Snowshoe hare Lepus americanus Moderately sensitlve .
Bobcat Lynx rutus Sensi&ive
Red fox Vulpes fulva Moderately sensi0ve
Mountain lion Felis concolor SensiGve
Coyote Canis latrans Minimally sensitive
Porcupine Erethizon dorsazum Minimelly sensi[ive
Pine marten Martes amencena ` Sensitive
F3ed squirtel Sciurius hudsonicus Moderately sensiUve
Deer mouse Peromyscus spp. Minimally sensitive
Nu[tall's cottontail Sylvilagus nuttelli Minimally sensi[ive _
' Long-taled Mustela frenata Moderately sensitive
weasel
' Red•backed vole Microtis clethrionomys Sensitive
Bat Myotis spp. Minimally sensitive
BIpOS
Bald eagle Haleaeetus Minimally sensitive
leucocephalus
Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos MinimWly sensitive
Perigrine falcon Falco peregrinus Minimally sensitive
Red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis Min-Moderately sensitive
Northem goshawk Accipiter gentilis Minim;illy sensitive Northem 3-toed picoides tridac[ylus Moderately sensiove
woodpecker
Hairy woodpecker Picoides villosus Moderately sensitive
Northem flicker Colaptes auratus MinimWly sensitive
MacGillivarys Oporomis tolmiei Moderately sensibve
warbler
Pygmy nutha[ch Sitta pygmaea Moderately sensitive
Warbling vireo Vireo gitvus Moderately sensitive
Red crossbill Loxia curvirostra Moderately sensi[ive
Green-taled Pipila chlorurus Moderately sensitlve
[owhee
Virginia's warbler Vermivora virginiae Moderately sensitlve
Cedar waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum Minim211y sensitive . '
Magpie Pica pica Minimsdly sensitive
Stellars jay Cyanocitta stellen Moderately sensi6ve
Gray jay Perisoreus canadensis Minimally sensitive
Tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor Moderately sensitive
AMPHIBIAN
Tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Sensitive
27
~
b
(Draffg) Van?°s ~nvironmeuata? Sgrategic Plaau
9
REFERENi,eES
Garbe, lAlarren, Materials on VVafier Flow in the Eagle River
Basin Presented to the Eagie River Assembly, 1993.
Town of Vail, "The Vail Overview", Community Relations
Division, 1993
Touvn of Vail, "Development Statistics of the Towrn of Vail", De
, partment of Community Development, January 1994.
Vail Valley Consolidated UVater District,llVater Management .
Plan, December 1993.
U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 Census, 1990
28
ee
eg
TOWN OF YAIL
75 South Frontage Road Department of Communiry Development
I/ail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21381479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development
DATE: June 7, 1994
SUBJECT: Bear Proof Garbage Containers
- - - - - - - - - t--- - -
- -
I. BACB(GROUND:
The Town of Vail is located in Black bear habitat and bears are frequently seen within the
Town of Vail. In 1993, there were over 300 reports to the Department of Wildlife (DOW) and
Vail Police Department of Black bears in the Town of Vail. Many of the complaints received
by the Department of VVildlife result from bears tipping over garbage cans at residences
throughout the Town. The most significant problem area is the Intermountain neighborhood in
west Vail. Bears are primarily found in the Town of Vail from May to August.
Problems with bears and garbage have been most notable in our country's National Parks
e.g., Yellowstone, Glacier, and the Smokey Mountains. Bears, once accustomed to easily
available garbage to supplement their diet, will continue to pursue garbage as a regular
source of food. When garbage becomes a regular part of a bears diet, then bears begin to
associate humans with food which is inherently dangerous. Although bears are not naturally
aggressive to humans, the majority of human related injuries from bears result wrhen humans get in between bears and food.
When the Department of Wildlife finds a bear in town, officers will usually attempt to trap and
move the bear to a remote location in the White River National Forest. Drugging and
moving bears can be very stressful and bears have occasionally died in transit. Bears
entering inhabited areas will increasingly result in the extermination of those bears writh the
implementation of the DOWs new policy on problem bears. Last season, a bear typically got
two chances to be relocated and then on the third incident the bear was put down. fVow the
Department of Wildlife will be putting down any bear that may threaten humans.
A proactive measure being used in many National Parks, and now in Snowmass Village, is to
use bear proof garbage cans. If bears are prevented from eating garbage through bear proof
garbage containers, they then no longer have a need to go into populated areas. They also
begin to disassociate humans with food. Although, some wildlife biologists believe that when
bears become dependent on garbage it may not be possible to break a bear's associations of
~
humans with food. However, programs to use bear proof garbage cans in the National Parks
and other areas have decreased human and bear conflicts.
'y 19. OPTB08dS TO ADDRESS BEARS AND Ge4RBAGE
Below are four options for preventing conflicts between bears and humans in the Town of Vaii.
These options were developed from discussions with the Department of Vllildlife, BFI, and
Honeywragon.
A. uncentide Program
In 1993, the Department of V1lildlife and the Town of Vail staff began discussing the idea of
creating an incentive program to encourage Town of Vail residents to use bear proof garbage
cans certified by the fVorth American Bear Society. The containers are approximately five feet
tall by four feet wide (see Attachment 1). The color of the container is brown. VUaste
containers in the Town of Vail are required to be concealed so as to not detract from the
areas visual quality. People do place their containers on the street during trash pick-up
days. This would not be recommended with bear proof containers and may require people to
pay for the additional cost of waste haulers walking onto their property to collect their garbage.
Containers would have to be located where waste handlers could pick them up.
The major obstacle to using bear proof garbage cans is their cost. The cost of a double trash
container is $597 (see Attachment 2). Some matching funds are available from the
Department of Wildlife and BFI to help reduce property owners costs. It is proposed that the
Town of Vail match the Department of Wildlife's contribution. Table 1 describes one possible
contribution scenario. Under this scenario 30 containers could be purchased.
Table 1: Proposed Contributions
Contribution/can Total Contribution
Department of Vllildlife $100 $3,000
Town of Vail $100 $3,000
BFI (BFI Customers Only) $100 no limit now
Property Owner $297 BFI/$397 non BFI n/a
$597 (30 containers)
It has been proposed that this program could be focused on the Intermountain neighborhood
to have the greatest impact and to also determine the effectiveness of a bear proof garbage
container program. It is recommended that Intermountain be used as a test-bed for these
containers before either an ordinance or a more significant subsidy program is implemented.
It is proposed that the Department of Wildlife take the orders for the containers and the
containers would be shipped to the DOW and then distributed with the assistance of the Towrn
of Vail and BFI to residences.
B. BeaP PPOOf GaPba9e COP14a9B1eP OPdiP1aP1Ce
Since the number of containers that may be subsidized is limited, the Town may want to
consider an ordinance to require all garbage containers to be enclosed or be bear proof
containers. Snowmass Village recently passed a bear proof ordinance to try to reduce
conflicts between bears and humans (Attachment 3). Snowmass Village passed an
ordinance with the full support of the community that requires property owners to either use
bear proof containers or store containers inside. The Village also spent $50,000 to purchase
bear proof garbage can lids for Town residents. Before creating an ordinance for the Town of
Vail, it is recommended that staff evaluate the cost and effectiveness of this policy for the
Town. . C. Educa4ion
~ An action recommended in the draft Environmental Strategic Plan is to implement a wildlife
awareness program for residents. Part of this program should be to educate residences on
the problems of bears in Town and encourage residences to keep garbage safely enclosed.
D. Neighborhood Garbage Containers
An alternative to providing individual bear proof containers is to provide large containers for a
neighborhood during the summer months. This alternative would most likely be significantly
less than providing individual containers and make garbage collection much easier. Two
problems with this approach is that it would be difficult to prevent people not paying for
garbage collection from using these containers and it may be difficult to locate these
containers in Vail neighborhoods.
I11. C0NCLUS10N
With over 300 reports of bears in the Town of Vail last year, it is only a matter of time before
someone is injured in an accident. It is also very likely that the number of bears that have to
be "put down" in the Town of Vail will.increase. Staff recommends that the Town provide
support for a pilot project in partnership with the DOW and BFI, to subsidize individual bear
proof containers. It is also recommended that Town staff evaluate the cost of a bear proof
container ordinance in the Town of Vail and the effectiveness of a limited container "change-
out" program. After completing a pilot project and evaluating the cost effectiveness of an
ordinance staff could make a recommendation for a comprehensive program to address the
issue of bears and garbage containers.
• ' ~t 1'
d '
~
-Rift
. . Attachment 1
o .
, . ~
Aik~ ~
~ ~
• ~ O a ~ . ,
4 ~ .
4 •
~ , • p ^ ~ ; i
I
I
\
\
ao•P~o^ `
\
4S•Yi0°
. 1 '
,
- ~
, . .
. ~ . . . .
~
iR14! f~~~
° . - Attachment 2
North Arrierican Be'ar Society
~
~ DescrIlption PRICE
' Rainwater Catc ent 15,414.80
. ; Manway 131000
Lifting ILugs 182a80
FIlbePglaSS TrO~gh 19050o00
LAftIlng LlIgS 182.00
~ ~~~e TPash Container (STC) 249.98
Z" Fab9~ GalVo PoSt9 W/ tn9g 45e9/
Brkt9s & Cap for (ST~)
~~~icap S~~e Trash 38601 3
Conta~~~ (HTC)
;
'Double Tras~ ~~~ta~~~ (DTC) 597071
i ` 4 Cubflc Yard Container wflth 1 9470a90
one (1) Hood
Bear Proof Hood (only) for, 15309? .
. ~ four (4) Cubic Yard Containers .
~ea~ P'roof Food B0x 286073
ar Trap '~~afler 49320e00
Tennso Thirty day ne$o
.
o p.-.(~ ~nop a o
Prices Good Un~~ June. 309 1993.
P.O. Box 92R1 0 Scottsdale, AZ R5252 o (602) qs t-7a?9 I'ax: (602) A9t-1394
; - Attachment 3 -
~ . ~ 1•.
a ~ ,s~ A ~~y " • •O- . ' , •
b/ LI . Y : df e~1
.4i •
'r
ab • ~ S~
~
MEMORANDUM .
TOo All owners of trash dumpster 1ocations or operators of tcrash
dumpsteg facilities.
FR0M: Art Smythe. Chief of Poiice
DA'P1Eo March 29, 1994
SUB5ECT: Ordinance ivo. 1, Series of 1994, x'egarding bear proot
refuse containers and bear resistant dumpster storeage struettares.
As most of you are aware, over the past three years there has
been an inerease in the number of bears frequenting the populated
areas of our Vi,llage. Tlnfortunately, this past summer, these incursaons resu7.ted in a
significant publie safety concern whieh necessitated the relocation
of some of the bears by the Colorado Division'of Wildlife. This
relocation procedure is extremely sti'essful for the animals and,
on one ocCasbon, pgoved fatdl for a smail hear cub.
It has been clear from the onset that ali of the pxoblems
assaeiated aith beags in Snowmass Village can be Iin}eed to
discarded food atems; prfmarily garbage from dumpsters. The
bears quickly become conditioned to this food source and conflicts
with humans beeome inevitabbe. ,
In xesponse ta this situation, 'che Town Council unanimously passed
Ordbnance No. 1, Series of 1994, w'hich amends the Town's Solid
Waste Ordanance and establishes prvvisions regalyding bear-preo,f
re£use containers and bear resistant stguctures for the storage
of refuse containers. A Copy of this Ogdinance xs attaehed and
the key elements can be summarized as foblows:
1. Dumpsters whfch are not stored within sheds or buiidings
must be bear=proof dumpsters.
2. The Town's Solid bdaste Department will provide these bear
proof dumpsters and they must b2 not be visibie fzom off the
premises where they are located. Ig these bear°prodf
dumpsters are visible grom off the premises, they must be
stored within a dumpster enclasure or screened in some
manner.
d~ • .
' r .
~ 3. Dumpsters which are not bear=pgoof are now required to be
stored wgthin fullv encgoBed sheds or buildings.
4. These dumpster sheds shalY be constructed og modified in '
sueh'a way as to be bear resistarat, requiring significant
fogce for a bear to gain entry. ,
5. Owners of dumpster locations must ensure that reguse is
properly disposed of in the dumpster, that the area is
leegt free of ar?y loose accumulation of i:rash aad that the
daors to the sheds are closed artd secure when xefuse is not
being deposited. 1
A survey of dumpsteP sites currentiy in use throughout the
Village indiCates that most sheds and containers aiready meet the
gequirements called for in the new Ordinance. However, there are
same facilities that Qa not and we look forward to working wfth
you to briag them into compZi3nee. Officers from the Aaimal
Control Department wiil be eonc2ucting on-si.te visits and wiil be
prepared to answer any questions that you might have about the
Ordinance.
We beiieve thaic by worleing together on this project we can
significantI.y reduCe the number of negative contacts and create
a sager env$ronment for residenta, guests and bears.
a
>
+ TOWN OF SlYOWMASS VIL%AGE
~ TOWN GOUNC$L
OFtDIRTANCE N0 0 I •
SEFtIE$ OF 1994 .
AN aRDZNANCE AIrtENDINr. fiHE PROVYSIONS OF CHAPTER XVZTI OF THE IdLTAFICIPAL CODE
BY ESTABLISIiYNG PROV%SYONS IREGARDYAtG BEARdpROOF REFUSE CONTAINERS AAID F3EAR=
RESISTANT STRUGTURES FQR THE STORAGE OF REFUSE CONTAYNEFtS.
t,dHEREAS, the Colarado Divisaon of 6Jild~,ife h~s requested tP~~ Town
Council . to enaet an Ordiraanse requirbng beag°proef refuse eontairaers; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has requested the Pumlic Works Director anel
the Chief of Police to review the gequest of the Dbvisbon of Wildlafep and
WHEREAs, the Public Works Director and the Chaef ob Palice have
recommencleci ta the Towz: Couflcil that bear-proof refuse contair?ers become
mandatory fog the storage, collecta,on and disposal ef reguse; anci
WHEREAS, the Town Council is aware of the ancreaseci ancidenee af bears
entering hames w~thir? the Town in search of good; and
WlIEREAS, the ~own Ca?xncil desares to promote the maintenance of
' ldlbfe withan the Town; and .
imlw
IMP
inhiERF-AS, the Town Council desires to miniffiize the congact between
bears and resbderags of the Town; ancl
'HERF-AS, the Town Cauncil is concerned for the safety arid well lbebng
of the residengs af the Town and.wildlife; and
WFiF-REAS, the ~own Council desires to establlsh apelicy og the Tourn go
pzomote the utblization og bearmprQaf refuse cantainers; and
WHEREAS, the-Tawn Council has determifled taat the public-health,
safety and welfage is in jeapardy due to the increasefl incidarace of bears
waghin the Tvwn; and
WHER€A SP the Tawn Council gbnds that the utilbzation of bear-pxoog
geguse contabners wb11 reduce the incaclence og incursion by bears into
geftase contaaners; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council f inds ghat the utilbzation of bear resistang
sgructures gor the sgorage of gefuse will reduce the incidence of iaacursiori
by bears into dumpsters within the Town; and
*~ne~w iw
am~
:?EAd: . . , o
~ r •
e° 6dHERF-AS, the Tvwn Council gands tY~~t the utiiization of bearmproof
refuse containers and mear resistant structures for the storage of refuse
.cont~b~er~ reduces the possi.bility of detximental contact between bears and
!Iiumans ; and
6JHEREAS, the Town Cauncil has determined that bear-proof refuse congainers and laear-resistant structures for the storage of refuse
containers will protect the public health, safety and wglfare.
NOW, THF'REFORE, BE IT ORDAZNgD by the Town Council of the Town of
Snawanass Village as follows:
1. Statemeng og policv. The Public Works Dbrector shall insure that
all gypes of rafuse containers antended to receive refuse which is edible •
by bears are bear°greof containexs which aze re5].Stant go bears, or are
sgared witha.n a SgPuCture whieh is a building tdithin the meaning of the
Uniforffi Builcling code, or enclosed in astructure which will require
significant force anr3 a forcible entry by a bear attempting to enter the
structureo All refuse containers must be stdred in a sgructure or, ig
laear-proaf, screened from the public view.
2. Bear°Proaf Container Provisions, Sectiofl 18-1 bs amended by the
addition of the fo1J.Qwbng:
18d1°3 Aumpster Enclosure as astructure constructed a.n
accordance witYa the stauctural requirements of the Uniform
Buildbng Code in effect in the Z`own, irrespective of tYae actual
_ enclosed square foatage of ghe structuree The stxucture shall
consist of fous sades anci aroof, one side accammodatirag adooP
fog access to ghe refuse containero The structuzs shall have the
general appearance of dumpster enclasures presently existing
wighan the Towri. The precise location and design of the dulnpster
enclesuge skaall be approved by the Town Planner pgior to the
assuance of a building permit for the structure, The Tawri
Planner may approye a variance from the design requirements upon
good cause shewm to the satisfaction of the Town Pl$nraer.
18-1P7d6 Refuse Containers> A11 refuse containers intencted to
geceive reguse which is edible by bears shall be either Pub7.ic
Works Director apprvved bear-proof refuse cantainers which
prevent a bear from having access to the C017teht5, or refuse
containers which are stored within a Dumpster Enclosure, a
building, house og garageo
18-1-7-7 Bear-Proof Refuse Containers. A bear-proof refuse
cantainer must nat be visible from aff the premises, lat or
parcel upon which it is 7.oca.ted. If ghe bear-proof refuse
containeg bs vbsable from ogf ghe premises, lot or parcel, ghen
the centainer must be stored within a Dumpster Eaaclosuree
-2-
r;31-1994
_
3. Fesiaential Co?leCtion Practices. Section 18-1-5-2(b) shall be
ar~enced by the addition of the following at the end of the existing
.paragraph:
"Al1 refuse containe:s shall be stozed, when not placed far
eollectian on the Collection bay, an the hause eg garage ag the
resider,tial cusgomer or in a dumpster enclosure. °1 4. brop Off Collection. The provisions of Section 18=165-3 are
hereby amended by the additdon of subparagraph (c) as foilowse
°1e. Refuse Congainer. The Public Works Direcgor sha11 provide a
bear-proof refuse container or shall construct and maintain a
dumpster enclosure in aceordance with the provisions of
Section 18-1°7-6.11
5. Commercial cozleetion Praetices. 5ectlon 18-1-5 a.s hereby
amended by the addition of section 18-1-6-5, as follows:
18-1m6°5 Bear Avoidancee A1I Custpmers shall keep the.dumpstee
collection location premises free from the accumulatian of refuse
edimle by bears and shall ensure that all gefuse is properly
disposed o¢ in the dumpster. All bear-proof dumpsters or
struct-ures congaining dumpsgers shall remain secured when refuse
is not being rieposited to prevend access to the dumpster by
bearso
READ, APPROVED AN'D ADOPTED on first x°eaciing on January 3, 1994, by a
of 7ifl gavor and 0 opposed.
READ, APPROVED PND At70PTEp on second reading, as amended, on January
17, 1994, by a vote of 6in favor and o vppased. Councilzaember Shore was
absent.
OWN dF SNO SS ILLAGE
~
Bv : .
~ James , ~okez, ~yoP
ATTE5T:
\.V . ~
p~
Tx'udb Worline, Z'own Clerk
cadno:d I.44
TOTAL P.06
.i
L^
DES9GN REV~EW BOARD AGENDA
June 1, 1994
3:00 P.M.
Discussion of impacts of development on steep slopes. 99:00 a.an. - 91e30 a.rne
-Kathy Langenwalter
-Jeff Bowen -
PB~OJECT ORBENTATVON, 11.30 a°m. - 1.00 pem.
5911'E V@S9TS 1:00 p.n'u. - 3:00 p.m.
1. Regal - 1079 Sandstone Drive.
2. Brown - 1330 Sandstone Drive.
3. Atwell - 1390 Buffehr Creek Road.
4. V1/est Vail Mall - 2151 North Frontage Road.
5. fVational Velvet Dry Cleaners - 2141 fVorth Frontage Road.
6. Taco Bell - 2151 fVorth Frontage Road.
8. Lodges at Timbercreek - 2893 Kinnickinnick.
9. Gregg - 1966 West Gore Creek Drive.
10. Smith - 1367 Vail Valley Drive.
11. Caulkins - 3010 Booth Creek Drive.
12. Sundial Townhomes - 5040 Main Gore Drive.
Drivers: Jim and George
Xxx
1. Sundial Townhomes - Sign application. mm
5040 Main Gore Drive/Sundial Townhomes.
Applicant: Mark Matthews MOTIOfV: Borne SECOIVD: Bowen VOTE: 4-0 4
Approded with conditions.
2. Smith - Demo of single family home and construction of new duplex JC
including a 250 application.
1367 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 5, Vail Valley 1 st Filing.
Applicant: David Smith
MOTION: Borne SECOIVD: Bowen VOTE: 4-0
Approded with condigi0ns.
3. Brown - Fourteen townhomes. AK
1330 Sandstone Drive/Lot G-4, Lionsridge 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Stewart Brown
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Conceptual revAew - no dote 4aken.
~
~
4. Gregg - Single family residence. RS
1966 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 44, Vail Village West.
Applicant: Jim Gregg
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled until June 15, 1994.
5 Caulkins - Garage addition. , RS
3010 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 4, Block 3, Vail Village 11 th Filing. ,
Applicant: George Caulkins
MOTION: Borne SECOND: Brainerd VOTE: 4-0
Approved with conditions.
6. National Velvet Dry Cleaners - Sign variance. - RS
2141 North Frontage Road West/West Vail Mall.
Applicant: National Velvet Dry Cleaners
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled until June 15, 1994.
7. The Cryer - Newspaper tioxes. RS
Various locations in the Town.
Applicant: William Able
MOTION:, Borne SECOND: Bowen VOTE: 4-0 ,
Tabled indefinitely.
8. Taco Bell - Sign program change. RS
2151 North Frontage Road/West Vail Mall. Applicant: Fred Turner
MOTION: Borne SECOND: Bowen VOTE: 4-0
Consent approved.
9. Zneimer - Conceptual review of new single family residence. RS
Lot 7, Tract A, Lia Zneimer Subdivision.
Applicant: Ed Zneimer
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Conceptual review - no vote taken.
10. Bannister - New Single Family Residence RS
2930 Snowberry Drive/Lot 20, Block 9, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Frank Bannister
MOTION: Borne . SECOND: Bowen VOTE: 3-0 (Brainerd abstaaned)
Approved with conditions.
2
1
11. Gibson/Robinson -Conceptua0 review of proposed duplex. GR
1987 Hornsilver/Lot 10, Block 1, Vail Village 8th Filing.
Applicant: Tom Gibson and IVorm Robinson
MOTION: SECOIVD: VOTE:
CoraceptuaV rediew - no vote taken.
12. Lodges at Timbercreek - Sign application. GR
2893 Kinnickinnick/Lodges at .Timbercreek.
Applicant: Anne Fitz
MOTION: SECOIVD: VOTE:
Consent approved wBth conditions.
13. West Vail Mall - Exterior repaint. GR
2151 North Frontage Road/Lot 2, Vail Das Schone 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Mickey Gart
MOTION: Borne SECOiVD: Bowen VOTE: 4-0
Approded woth condBtsons.
14. Lauterbach - IVew duplex. JC
4335 Bighorn Road/Lot 4, Block 3, Bighorn Subdivision 3rd Addition.
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
MOTION: Borne SECOND: Brainerd VOTE: 3-0 (Bowen out of room)
Approved with cowcli4ions.
15. Regal - Changes to approved plans. JC
1079 Sandstone Drive/Lot A-3, Block A, Lionsridge 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Walter Regal
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Consenq approved.
16. Atwell - IVew single family residence with employee housing unit. JC
1390 Buffehr Creek Road/Briar Patch, Envelope C, Parcel F, Lionsridge 2nd Filing.
Applicant: 1lVebster Atwell
MOTION: Borne SECOfVD: Bowen VOTE: 4-0
APp9'ONed NMIth COB'9dltYOP1S.
17. Thain - Remodel of Texas Townhomes units including two 250 additions in JC
basement of building.
483 Vail Valley Drive/Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Applicant: John and Carmen Thain
MOTION: Borne SECOND: Bowen VOTE: 4-0
Appo'oded woth conditions.
3
. ;
?
18. Garza - New Primary/Secondary with a Type I EHU. GR
2399 Chamonix Lane/Lot 17, Block A, Vail Das Schone 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Sergio Garza
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled to June 15, 1994.
19. Morris/Allen - Remodel of primary/secondary residence. GR
1643 Matterhorn Circle/Lot 22, Matterhorn Subdivision.
Applicant: Gene and Ann Morris MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled to June 15, 1994.
20. Schulman - 250 request to finish 3rd floor loft. AK
1734 Sunburst Drive/Lot 74, Golfcourse Townhomes.
Applicant: Lee Schulman
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled until June 20, 1994.
21. Theys - Conceptual review of new single family residence. GR
1778 Alpine Drive/Lots 11 and 12, Vail Village West 1 st Filing.
Applicant: James Mesa and Thom Theys
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled indefini$ely.
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT \
Mike Arnett Hans Woldrich
Bob Borne
Sally Brainerd
Jeff Bowen (PEC)
STAFF APPROVALS
Ludwig - Addition of new airlock on east side of primary unit.
792-A Potato Patch Drive/Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch.
Applicant: Alan Ludwig
Lifthouse Condominiums - Repaint.
555 East Lionshead Circle/Lifthouse Condominiums.
Applicant: Packy Walker
Telemark Townhomes - Replacement of existing pool on common area of Telemark Townhomes.
1090 Vail View Drive/Telemark Townhomes.
Applicant: Telemark Townhomes Association
4
a
.r
0
Sable/Lupine Residence - VVindow changes.
3946 Lupine Drive/Lot 5A, Block 2, Bighorn 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Jack Snow
Delude - Addition/Remodel.
5040 A/iain Gore Place, #B-5/Sundial, Phase II.
Applicant: Claudia Delude
Indian Creek - Modifications to previously approyed plan. _
1139 Sandstone Drive, Building 2/1-ots A-1 and A-2, Lionsridge Subdivision.
Applicant: Mike Lauterbach
Brown - Landscaping improvements.
2952 Bellflower/Lot 18, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Jo Brown
Urano - Entry vestibule addition.
5033 Snowshoe Lane/Lot 25, Vail Meadouv 1 st Filing.
Appticant: Gary and Leslie Urano
Didio - Minor alteration to entry remodel.
5035 fVorth Main Gore Drive/Lot 20, Block 7, Bighorn Subdivision 5th Addition.
Applicant: Diane and Fred Didio
ABC Schoot - Reroof.
149 IVorth Frontage Road/Unplatted parcel north of the I-70 right-of-way, north of Vail Lionshead 2nd
Filing.
Applicant: Holly Bukacek, representing ABC Schoot
5
a1 , ~ 1 V
V May 18, 1994
VAILVALLFY
FOUNDATION
Yrocidirig!cadcrsl7ip MS. P11n Br3RdITleyer
in aU:letic, educatitirial TOWIl Of V311
aiid cuttural endeauora
to enl:ance ond sustanr 75 South Frontage Road
t/ic q:eality qf(ire ir, ~T ~ p
tke Vnil b'allep y CD 81657 Dear Pam:
Board of Directors
Spring is just starting to show in the Vail Valley and we are already
President Gerald R. Ford
Kobert E. Ba,-ren planning two tremendous ski events for next ski season, America's Legacy
Ixon D. Qlack
Carolyn S. Blount World Cup and the American Ski Classic. The ski season will start with
crais M. cogut three s ectacular World Cu races December 2-4. Once a ain Vail has
James Berr}I Craddock P P g ~
Jack cr°5b>' been selected to host the world's finest women racers who will compete
.Andrew Y. Dal~H. Ben;an,in lluke. Jr. in the Downhill, Super-G and Giant Slalom events.
Harry H. Frampton, !II
lohn Garnsey , -
Georxe N. cue«. Jr.
Pepi Gramshammer The American Ski Classic will be the highlight of spring in Vail with the
s«ve N. xaber
Martha Head , Ford Celebrity Cup and Legends of Skung returning March 9-12.
\1'illiant J. Hybl
Elaine W. Kelton
He°"'P''ra`'" We are pleased to provide you with sponsorship information for these
Fitzhugh Scott, E)nentus
M;cnaei s. sf,<,nno„ ~ two celebrated events. We have included a sponsorship proposal and the
Rodnev E. Sli(er
C. Phiiin sr»>i« new event brochure for your review.
tvcn,rd t_. swib ,
osc.ar i.. Tdr,g
Herhert A. Wenheim
We'd like to take a moment and highlight some of the great sponsor -
Jof,n carr„t, benefits offered next year: .
0 7hree I-hour ESPN televlsed s•hows- Amerlca's Legacy
0 715ree 1-hour 1r've internatlonal shows
1989 ~turla`Arr;,,,, ° One-l hour national network show-American Skl Classic
Ski C`hnmpionsltij,s
AF.1 n;n1d Fom,,,, 0 10 days ofskiing at Trail /Bea ver Creek -
Amcncan Ski Ctassic 0 8 days VII'hospltalrty areas
llai(ht7ernatronaf o Charlty calcutta _
Summer q/ Uante
0 Pepl and Sheika Gramshaminer's Crystal Ball
Ccrnld X. Ford '
Amphi(Geater '
F«pzdi„r 1he FGture _ We look forward with enthusiasm to another exciting year of skung in
HunibfnioerAwards Vail. We will be in contact with you to discuss your sponsorship
an,l Sr.lrolanltips
1994 involvement, until then, think VAIL'99!
tY~rld:'1lounfair~
Hike Chmtipronsl:lps
, Warm regards,
a
P.O. Box 309
Vail, Colorado 81658 .
303-476-9500 ~
Fax 303-476-7320
A Colorado 501 (c) (3)
Nonpsoht Co?poration
r,
.
. •
TOWN OF VAIL
SPONSORSIHIP PROIPOSAL
1994 AMERICA°S LEGACY/1995 A1ViE1tICAN SKI CLASSIC
1994 AmExrCA'S LEGACY 1995 AmEnICAv SKi Ci4.ssrc
December 1-4, 1994 _ March 7-12, 1995
Recognition
• Listing as Silver Sponsor on sponsor page of • Listing as Silver Sponsor on sponsor page of
Official Program Official Program
• One full-page advertisement in the Official • One full-page advertisement in the Official
Program Program
• Right to use America's Legacy logo in • Right to use American Ski Classic logo in
product advertising product advertising
• Town of Vail representation on Organizing • Town of Vail representation on Organizing
Committee Committee
• Two on-course banners for World Cup • Two on-course banners for Visa Ford
Downhill, Super G and Giant Slalom Cup races
• Two finish-area banners for World Cup • Two on-course banners for Rolex Legends of
Downhill, Super G and Giant Slalom races Skiing races
• Two finish-area banners for Visa Ford
Cup races
- • Two finish-area banners for Rolex Legends of
Skiing races
Social
• Sixteen VIP credentials, providing access to • Sixteen VIP credentials, providing access to .
skiing December 1-4, and access to skiing March 8-12, and access to hospitality
hospitality tents December 2, 3 and 4, 1994 tents 9-12, 1995
• Four invitation to the Sponsor Lunch . Eight VIP gift bags
• Sixteen invitations to the Welcome Party • Sixteen invitations to the Welcome Party
• Two Eagle Medallions (a transferable pass • Two Eagle Medallions (a transferable pass
good for unlimited skiing at Vail and Beaver good for unlimited skiing at Vail and Beaver
Creek resorts, as well as golf privileges for Creek resorts, as well as golf privileges for .
one year throughout the Vail Valley) one year throughout the Vail Valley)
• Four invitations to the Visa Ford Cup Finals
PartY
• Four invitations to the Rolex,Legends of
Skiing banquet
• Three race spots for the Visa Ford Cup races .
' • Four invitations to the Gorsuch Tea Dance
Sponsorship Donation
• All benefits of the Silver Sponsorship package are priced at $27,500 cash, plus 420 one-day
parking passes.
• Banners, lodging and promotional materials are to be provided by sponsor. (Banner specifications
are 3' x 12'.) . ,
.
0
Il994 Ameriica°s ILegacy/Il995 American Sid C9ass~~
~~~~duRe of Edents
1994 Alnwacca'$ Legacy '
Wo.-dd Cup Wosrnen's Races .
IIDa¢e Time Lveaag ~oc~gin
Monday, ATwember 28 , World Cup teams arrive
Tuesday, A1ovember 29 Downhill training Internadonal
Wednesday, Alovember 30 Downhill training International
• Thnrsday, December 1 Downhill trainin
, g Intemational
7:00 pm Welcome party - Library
, 8:00 pm Public pick/Sock hop Dobson Ice Arena ,
Friday, December 2 11:00 am Downhill race Intemational
7:00 pm Crystal Ball Hyatt
,
Saturday,,December 3 8:30 am Sponsor Breakfast Cookshack
11:00 am Super G race Internadonal
7:00 pm Public pick/Street party Pepi's Deck
7:30 pm Team party _ Serranos
Sunday, December 4 10:00 am Giant Slalom race International
- 1995 Almeyican Skd Classac
Legends of Skaang ancd FoPd Cup Itaces
IlDate 'g'eme lEvent ILoc_
Tuesday, March 7 1:00 pm Friends of Vail race Haymeadow
7:00 pm Challenge race Haymeadow
8:00 pm Challenge party Hyatt
Wednesday, A4arch 8 11:00 am Legends Downhill training Centennial
7:00 pm Welcome party/Calcutta gyatt
Thwsday, March 9 11,:00 am Legends Downhill race Centennial .
7:00 pm Legends banquet Hyatt
Friday, March 10 8:30 am Racer breakfast Hyatt
10:30 am Ford Cup race Haymeadow
1:30 pm Tea Dance Hyatt
6:00 pm Rolex reception Colorado Ski Museum
8:00 pm Concert Dobson Ice Arena
Saturday, March 11 10:00 am Ford Cup race Haymeadow
7:00 pm Ford Cup finals Haymeadow
8:00 pm Tent party Hospitality tent
Sunday, Nlarch 12 9:00 am Legends Giant Slalom qualifications 1876
10:30 am Challenge matches Haymeadow
12:30 pm Legends Giant Slalom finals 1876
5/10/94
.
;
~
"HE NEW YORK TIMES SPORTS THURSDAY, MARCN 17,1994
~•5 K I I N G
3~~~
.i "r 7
.+~N.~~ «i~i c p. , t,3~~..'L' ~ t~t f t .s• t h YtM .
~y~
S'°
C 5f J
) , y
tls s feYy yr ~':g x ic V`,"Rx~~
s
y f~4.<+a' ? - e „l~ . e
404~ ~ s~
t 44
4 f
{ ?
~M .
~
«I>:~~~,~'3~3"1'~Aa6~~.-.g',j
4 Gt~
f ~
.
'Y-
' ~ .t~ ~ Y . ''i' i,F,w' '~6 L .4,sa 'i ~ ~ Ri6:% yt 9 .s.•.~ '~`.,,~'.;lYsi~ky, :1 S y~~,.
.
S.'~ 6~ ? Nt ~ s i / j ~ Irs
Vix.-•LYy'
f 1:~ ~ ~ ~3 / ; ` s~ F~ ~y~ "~~'.G~f~~ (
f-•, t ? S.Y`iF'..'i~i.t }g}.rs .jt c
9 !'i
,3y f -
r p` :
t'*,.Gw'.~~~~~f-~~ .,eL ,"t`.e'~F.':E J"~
. . , . w.*,Ti . t;sa+F K.m~ .
Rcu"r
Marc Girardelli making turn in the last World Cup doumhill race in Vail, Colo., yesterday. His seventh-place finish gave him the 1.994 downhill title.
Moe, 3cl in Cup Downhill, Cets to .Srrtell the Snapa~ragons
By BARBARA LLOYD ~ today was Kate Pace ot Canada, with hill standings going into the race tc
Speclal to The New York Times a time of 1:47.26, followed in third by day, (inished in 1:38.17. Hanne
VAIL, Colo., Ma«h 16 -T,e poai- Pieabo Street also Vreni Schneider ot Switzerland, in Trinkl ot Austria was second, witi
um was small and rickety compared 1:47•27• 1:38.34; Mce's time was 1:38.66.
to the one at Lillehammer, NorweY.. walks away with With today's finish, Mce has added BNght sunshine blanketed th
two third-p.ace sts.-~C:ags tc "'ss Wcr:d IC,000-fMt downhill course on Vu:
to But smell Tommy the Mce tlowers took - a tne s ume mall bou coday - Cup downhill portfolio in the last 10 Mountain today. But the cheerinf
rlde gnd
quet of pink snapdragons - that were PeI-SOnal P days. Last weekend, he was third !n exuberant crowd turned suddenl,
handed him for his third-place tinish t the Wotld Cup race at Whistler, Brit• quiet as Pernilla Wiberg o( Swedei
here in the World Cup downhlll. CheerS at Villl. ish Columbia. tumbled down the course during
William Besse of Switzerland won Not a F9ash In the Pen rescheduled run.
the men's race, and KatJa Seizinger "It is awesome," said the 24-year- wlberg NnJures Ribs .
of Germany were first in the women's day, the best pertormance of her ca- old skier from Girdwood, Alaska. The Olympic i;old medatist in th
downhill. Her top finish, in 1 minute reer in a World Cup event. She won "People were thinking I was.a flash combined at Lillehammer, Wiber
47.08 seconds, earned her [he season's the silver medal in che downhill ac in the pan atter Aspen. But that was appeared to fall backward on her ski
overall World Cup downhill title. Lillehammer. because 1 was tired ouL" Moe was below French F ace, a partlcularl
But it was Mce and Picabo Street, "The Olympics is a dream, a big, alluding to two Worid Cup downhill nasty turn. She was rushed to Vai
the United States wunderkinds of the fuzzy dream place." Street said after • finishes earlier this month: 55th and Valley Nledical C:enter, which report
Winter Games, who walked away the race. "You can really have e 20th at Aspen, Colo., )ust after he ed that she had Injured ribs on he
with as much personal pride as high- dream-come-true finlsh. But here at returned to the United States trom lett side, and did not know when sh,
er standings had brought them at the World Cup, this is like my real job. Norway. could race again.
Lillehammer. 7'his is wha[ I do." At Llllehammer, he won a gold in The mishap vvas doubly unfortu
Street Finished Fourth Street finished 35-hundredths of a the downhill, and a silver in the super- nate tor Wiberg, since she was ii
Street, the 22-year-0Id skier irom second behind Seizinger, who also giant slalom. contention with 5eizinger to win th(
Sun Valley, idaho, finished tourth to- Won at Lillehammer. ln second place 4esse, sixth in the Worid Cup down- overall downhill World Cup title.
(I,d...S-TV~'1-~
a
. ~
A Happy Ending
Olyrnpic gold medalist Diann Roffe-Steunrotter
closed the book an an I 1-year career with a.
stirrang win at VaR - by William Oscar Johnson
"EVERYONE IS velline. 'Fairv tale! She was not. however, one of the favor-
Fairy tale!' and I guess they re rivht." said ites in Vail. Her best Super G finish this "
Diann Roffe-Steinrotter. "I have to admit ~ear before Lillehammer had been 13th,
that sometimes when I set mv mind to it. I and in her one post-Olympic trv she had
do some pretty unbelievable things." been 15th. In Lillehammer she had an-
The latest unbelievable thine Roffe- nuuncecl that she would retire at the end
Steinrotter did was win her tirst World ut this season and that the Super G in V"ail t`
Cup ski race in nine vears. She did it las[ wuuld end an often painful career that ~
Thursdav in Vail. Colo.. where the 93-u-1 .zemed loneer than the 11 vears it
World Cup szason ~vrapped up k%i[h -panned. "The Austrian and Swiss media
iz,rand finales in ail four racini! disciplines: ',eep savine ['m 30." said Roffe-Steinrot-
downhill, slalom. ciant slalom and Su- eer last week. "I'm mature and I'm experi-
per G. What's more. it was the I:ist Worid enced, but. dammit. I'm not 30!"
Cup race of Roffe-Steinrotter ; career. 5he is 26. but her s[rme of competitive
and the tield featured all three medal w m- peaks and vallevs and her run of debilitat-
ners from the Lillehammer Olympics. ine injunes and reconstructive surgeries
That. of course. included Rotfe-Steinrot- %vould seem ro fit onlv mto a loneer life.
tzr herself, who onlv 30 davs eariier had She undenvent her first knee surgery (for
flown uut of inediocritv to w mthe eoid in inflamed patella) at 14 and her last (for
medal in the Olvmpic Super G. a blown antenor cruciate lieament) at 23.
%~ith [hree other knee operations and a
m damaeed hand.and bad shoulders in be-
Ntueen. She ~%on hcr first major race (the
n fll:lll[ >I:,lum ac the 1985 FIS world cham-
m pionshiQs in Bormio. Italv) at 17 and her
tirst World Cup event (the giant slalom at
Lake Placid) that same vear. She did not
wm a World Cup race or a championship
medal u[ am kind aeain until the 1992 Al-
bert\ ille Ulvmpics. when she eot the silver o:
; .
in ihe eiant slalom.
Then came Lillehammer. Then came ~
. ~
~ ail. "In all mv vears on the team. I often ~.._•-F~=c:;~.::.
raced in asort of neutral zone, but not
in chis race." RotYe-Steinrotter said. "I ond, and Austria's Anita Wachter, the'93
rrankecl up all mv faculties. hecause I did uverall World Cup champion. was third.
not \kant to spend the rest of mv life re- When the last racer crossed the finish
gretting that mv last race was a bad race." line. Roffe-Steinrotter dissolved in sobs,
Starnne in fourth position. ,he slashed coverine her face aeainst a flood of inem-
down a course filled with bumps and ories. "I couldn't stop crying because I
sweepine tums in 1:24.93, a time so stun- was so sad that it was over," she said. "I
niniz that only three women in the field of don't want to stop racing, but I know I
+ + tinished within a second of hec Katja have ro stop because I said I was going to
? Seizineer of Germanv, winner of the stop and because I really do want to
overall-season World Cup tides in both stop."
' che Super G and the downhill, was sec- Still. the taste of victory after so
long-since that giant slalom victory on
~ IYIoo. Hhaed 9n 4he fi19ea! SupeP C New York's Whiteface Mountain on
A '~0 s4ated"angs, doesn'4 waM mue6- March 13, 1985-triggered a fleeting de-
~•a P~_ . jus8'°to bea! nme a akeft legend." sire for more. Said Roffe-Steinrotter,
41
z
.
s
a steel-construction worker. and his uncle
Shane Johnson rook charge of Tommy's
marketing strateey. They eschewed big-
time aeents. "Tommds only real goal is to
r become a shiine legend," said Tom Sr.
z
"He's cinlv 24, and he can do that if he's a
~ little bi[ lucky. I just want to be here to
help him.
There will be no high-profile agent for
Roffe-Steinrotter, either. Although her
~ victories in Lillehammer and Vail traxis-
~ formed her from a hardworking joumey-
v
man into a hiehly marketable heroine, she
is retainir:e J: Kenneth Sowles, a young
lawyer from Burlineton, Vt., who has
_vA~L been her agent for siac vears. "I have no
desire to be an IMG market fish," she
said, referrine to Mark !vlcCormack's
hieh-powered International Manageme:nt
G: oup.
~ f That doesn't mean Roffe-Steinrotter
? has no plans. "I am marketable in a differ-
ent wav from most skiers because I'm re-
tired, and I don't want the short-term big-
splash t}pe of contract." she said. "I want
to eive something back to skiing and may-
O be enlighten and inspire people about
what it'S ?ike to be an Olvmpian. With all
~ the ups and downs I've had. I think I c:an
do some prettv meanineful motivational
speeches. One of my biLy dreams is to do
i f TV commentarv-maybe not just skiing."
~ Will Roffe-Steinrotter be able to live
without ski racing? "One thing I know,"
r_ - she savs. "If I cion't find something else
realiv competitive to do. I will drive Willi
insane. I hope I%vill fill those needs by
riding...
Willi is her husband, Willi Steinrotter,
-29, the men's soccer coach at Clarkson
Universitv in Potsdam. N.Y., who has
-.4.`.•-- "
traveled the «orld Cup circuit with
r.~:.
Roffe-Steinrotter this season. As for rid-
_ ine, she has done that since childhood and
~ now does trainine in equestrian eventing.
,:,.z:~,~-=~•-~'*' [s it possible that Roffe-Steinrotter will
win an Olvmpic eold on horseback?
"Oh, please."she savs. "I could never
Oh. Qod. I'd love ro continue raciniz if- Rof4e-SteinrotteP'S Super G time say somethine as pretentious as that. ]['m
if-ii! But there s roo much travel. And I was sm fast that only three women just a retired skier who loves to ride, and
have atireat husband. And we have all came withon a second of her. Olvmptc equestrians have worked for
kinds of thines we want to do. And i['s vears to get where they are. The whole
verv hard to get up for races ac mv age. post-Olvmpic letdown to produce a vic- idea reminds me of the Albertvblie
A nd, god. I crinee when I think back to torv in the Super G and a third-place tin- Games, when Cathy Turner won a gold
the awiul month before the Olvmpics. ish m che downhill at Whistler Mountain medal in pack skatine and then inforn?ed
%khen I woke up so scared everv morn- in Vancou~~er two weeks aeo, which he me and a couple of other Amencan ski
ine-scared that I'd mess up. scared that 1 followecl in Vail wi[h a third in che down- racers, 'The next sport I'm going to win a
%%ouldn't make the team. But I dealt with hill and a sixth in the Super G. Moe medal in is skiing.' She sounded seriaus,
[hat, and [ won the eold. and now I've won wound up third in the overall World Cup and we just gulped."
the last big race of mv life. I could hardlv Super G standines, the hiehest finish in Turner was back in Lillehammer as a
ask more of myself, could I°" the discipline fur an American in Worid short-track speed skater. winning another
Nor could her U.S. teammate Tommv Cup historv. eold. Don't look for Roffe-Steinrotter at
Moe. winner of the men's downhill in Lil- For Moe the future looms full of possi- the 1998 Winter Games in Nagano, Ja-
lehammer. Moe had recovered from a bilities, and last week his father, Tom Sr., pan-unless she's in the TV booth. ¦
67
~
a
Steinrotter etires as lr~~er
Sy3cw1 W TTud Nav YOr4 Tlm=
VAIL, Co?o.. March 17 -'Ihe scripe waa wrieten today for Diann
RofYe-Steinrocter, the world-class akler whose final curtain call in racing
turned out to be an excraordinary victory here tn the super giant slalom.
'Ihe 26-year-old Roffe-Stelnrotter, who staged an equally surprising
victory by winnmg the Super-G in the Lillehammer Olympics last
month, barreled through the Vatl gates with a Yerocity and Yearlessness
not seen among the 16 other women in this final World Cup event oY the
seasan.
By tinishing in 1 mmu[e 24.93 seconds, Roffe-Steinrotter was 14-
, hundreaths of a second taster chan the second-place tinisher, Katja
Seizinger of Germany, who won the overall world Super-G tltle. It was
the lasc run of an 11-year career for Roffe-Steinrotter, from Potsdam,
N.Y., who announced her rettremetit in Norway.
"I'm sad now because 1 don't want to stop," she said. ;'But ! have to
stop because 1 said 1 was going to stop."
In the men's Super-G, Tommy Moe, the Olympic downhill gold
medalist from Glydwood. Alaska, flnished sixth. That placed him third in
the overall Super-G championship, won by Jan Einar Thorsen ot
Norwav.
~%l~ P , • \ ~ --9'1. n~ ~ _ . ~ 1 _ I n 1 ~1.
aca.a-~
V/1/
To: All Interested ]Parties :
IFrorn: Cherie Paller 949-7086
l[Ze: Family Center 1Vleeting
~~~tinga
Monadmy, June 6th,1994
5:30 - 7:00 pm Meetflng
lEdwards Elementary School
A r~~ l~P6'~z~~-?~~ ~ i~ ,i ) i .
AGENDA
Seflf-introc9uctiora/Representing what organization?
Comrnittee Reports:
(Holly) Self-care Training
(Cherie) Family Development Center Planning Grant update
(Tsu) Head Start
(Kay) Even Start proposal
(Janet, Colleen) F'amily Literacy
(Cindy) EagleCare Medical Clinic
(IVancy, Rosie) Childcare 1Zesource & Referral
?(Lissa) "VVF Family lLearning Center"
(Laurie) Central Rockies Prevention Project
(ICathleen) . FNII'/HRC/FgST
(Peg, Kathleen) Teen I'regnancy Group
(Marge) ""ealthy Babies an.d Families"
(Sharon, Rosie) "Kids Connection"
OTHERS
AnnouncegnenYs
Set iV1ElETINC SCEDUL.E/strategic planning sessions?
Va i 1
. F
7172
~ 199T
iYEC~;'~~R,'rE ~iEdiTEe`~ ~
90 ;t 3494 ~
e
TOHHU~
I OF VAIIle uVEVl9S REILEASE
4VAIL
TOd~I 75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157
f~~R WMEDaATE RELEASE
May 31, 1994 Contact: Bob fi/icLaurin, 479-2105
Town iVianager
PEAK PARKBNG PROGRQ?M TO BE ACTIVATED AT FORD P14Ri4 SATIJRDAsl(
DURBNG BMHS taRADUAT901V & SOFTBALL TOURNEY
(Vail)--The Town of Vail vvill implement its peak parking program at Ford Park this
Saturday (6-4) to improve access for those attending Battle Mountain High School
Commencement exercises a4 the Ford Amphitheater and a 24-feam softball tournament
at fhe ballfields.
Four free shuttle buses vvill run from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturday and will transport
riders from the top deck of the Vail Transportation Center to Ford Park and back. The
service will be offered at five-minute interva(s. Stops will occur on South Frontage
Road and on Vail Valley Drive.
Also, in-close parking at the 250-space Ford Park lot will cost $2 per vehicle
Saturday, and will be offered on a first-come, first-served basis. Free parking will
continue to be offered in the Vail Village and Lionshead structures. The Ford Park
parking fees vvill be used to help off-set the cost of added bus service on the peak days.
Saturday's parking changes mark the first of 32 selected dates for implementation of
the peak program. The changes are intended to address safety concerns along South
(more)
Ford Park Reminder/Add 1
Frontage Road during peak usage of Ford Park from June through September. Other
peak days scheduled for June include the Colorado Children's Chorale concerts on
June 11 and 17; Hot Summer Nights concerts on June 21 and 28; and the Allman
Brothers concert on June 24. Parking will remain free at Ford Park during non-peak days.
For a schedule of peak events or for more information, contact the Town of Vail
Community Information Office at 479-2115.
# # #
\
n4 [J N OF Vel~IL NEV~S t~ELE!'1 E
To~ oF v~rL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21 D0
FAX 303-479-2157
FOR WMED@ATE RELEASE
June 1, 1994
Confact: Bob iVicLaurin, 479-2105
Town Manager
TOW~ ~F VA9L ANR9UAL COMMURllTY SURi/EV GOES OUT TFG9S ViIEEK
T0 4,300 RESIDEIVTS AIVD BU5{NESS OWNERS
(Vail)--The Town of Vail's annual community survey is being mailed this vveek fo
4,300 residents and business owners. Comments will be used to help e.stablish budget
priorities for 1995 and to evaluate levels of efficiency.
"The annual survey is a convenient way for individuals to let their views be known,"
said Bob iVicLaurin, town manager. "1/Ve're encouraging those vuho receive the survey
to take a few minutes to respond as candidly as possible."
This year's survey asks individuals to evaluate numerous services, including street
repair, parking, snow removal, bus service, police and fire protection, and library
,
services, among others. The questionnaire also probes community interest in such
issues as affordable housing, transportation, open space, daycare, air and water
protection, expansion of tourism opportunities and construction of a cemetery.
This marks the seventh year for the town's annual survey. In response to communify
comments from last year's survey, the town has taken steps to experiment with free
- evening parking during the ski season; approved a plan to construct roundabouts at the
Main Vail interchange to relieve traffic congestion; installed a satellite book return in
West Vail;
(more)
Community Survey/Add 1
increased bus service; and adopted a Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. Actions froni
other surveys have included creation of an environmental planner staff position; an
expansion of snow removal operations; increased funding for street maintenance and
street lights; and creation of the Vail Housing Authority. .
This year's survey is being mailed to registered voters and business owners in Vail. '
Anyone else wishing to participate may do so by calling the Town of Vail Information
Office at 479-2115. RespondPnts are asked to return the survey by June 15.
# # #
SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6- 1-94 ; 13:40 ; 3035287207- 3034752157;# 1t 3
a •
June 1, 1994 - 11 : 18
kAGLE COUNTY BUIlC11NG
OFFICE OF TFiE 551 BROADWAY
~ . . : l .t7. f30X Ssc]
BOARD OF Cl?NiMIS510NEtZ5 ,y:'':;!,•' . EACaE. L:4)1.C7RApp S 164 I
.
{3Q3) 37E-8b03 ~ •r • FAlC: (303) 378 7107
- F.,. . ,
• ~
w .
GLE COUNTY9 COXORA
AGENDA
(
~~~~~Y MI~~~~~~R"ba
REGULAR- MEET8N'~ !bAY
:9U-NE 6, 1994'
u u o~ a? tt ts ~s # w o#~#~ a ~r ~ o~ u,s't . tt n a.m\ a~ a a n~ ~ n~ a~, m r~
OgamO - T0e30 FfVORK SESSION - WEEKLY aJPDATE '
+wtamnnay aa" Room ' .98Gk D. L8WI3, CbUfliy M$1181ger
J • I
I OeSO ° T 1.00 BREAK
i.:. . ,
9 9:00 -'6 2:00 woRK SESSIOR! - PENDIING 9.ETIGA'fION
Uto+t,oI lalytram noom James R. fritae, Caun$y s4ttornBy
12a00 - 09 e30 . ! dUNCH
01.30 - 02:30 @WQRK SESSION - MEETBIVt3S AT°PENDED
6tt at tha FMIy GMa Hpnm .
02a30 - 02045 CONSEW CALENDAR
Guido cou,ty Roam i
Itmna al a raulmc and ewn oantrovmoial neeao mc f`Imad on tlm oonoant colorder ta daw vw Heinra w -ntY W~b110~d w v0ond ile Gme mid anerov on moro imoortant imnm
an e bnptliY 4laWa_ Any t:onmtclamr meY rn9~t ttat an Imrn bo'REOAOVFD• trmn rM mws~ tv411aiN a! WhOMwOd vepvaNlV. Affry membm af thn Pu61c muy •1[6[LUkSI^
ary ib- 6e 'RCMOVm' rrom Ihv Canwrd Apmde.
ti . BI'LIL F'AY0NG _
Lincla Pankuch, Accoijntir?g
Marlc SiYverthorn, ContrmUer
ACifODi9: ApProval subject ko reviovv by the County Manager.
2. ~AVROLL FOR J0.lNE 9. ~ 9414
Jgck D: Lewis, Cauhty Manager
ACTION: Approval subject to review by the Caunty Manager.
c:%wp51Wocs1JuNr;0a.AC9
.
SENT BY:EAGLE GOUNTY ; 6- 1-94 ; 13:40 ; ~3033287207i 3034792157,# 2/ 3
3. CF1ANGER ORDER N191MBER IDNE TO THE FAaFi(aROIlNDS ROAD
PAVBNG CONTRACT
John AIthoff, Emgineerong
Don Fesslor, Ftaad and Bridge
ACT9ON: Consider, appPaval.
4. COR~TRACT 6ET1JVEEN F-AGLE CO1,DN'TY, S'TA'TE OF COLmRAC~O
AND ROYSTON D"EY11POF['1° FOII EIOfIPI.OYEE PIGiltlC
Edse Lengel, Human Resaurces
AC1"~ON: Considav approuat.
02;45 -03:00 0. RE8OLUTIQN ACCEPTINIG ARBITRAtiE FiEPORT
EaplBCWntYNeuds Sherry Brandon, TrBasurer
Allen Sartin, Finance
ACT9ONe Consider approvel. '
..........._.._..u_ :~._.___..~.~1._..~:,,:;,.,._..
U0. , LEA,'E ,~~'iREEiil1E1117' BE'Q'V~EE~16 ~GLE COUI~TYe ST'A''E OF
C~~ORi4DO 'J4ND HERTZ CORPORATION FOR OVERFLm!!~
PARK91VG .~T THE EA. ,fiLE Cdl+lJlYTY REGIOIVAL AIRPORT
Llan Revnolds, Airpart
AC'~~ON: Consider approval_
' 10@. PAF3Tee40. RELEASE OIF A POF$T90R! OF STe4NDA3D "1A'i'dON
AND HAZARD. F-ASEi1AENT (Pe4RCEL B AMD PARCEL C}
Bab Loeffler, Assistant County Attnrney
AC'UBON: Consider appraeal. „ . '
Ib. ADOP't'I0k OF THE ORDINA6VCE APPRO\/ING lrHE
bNTERGOVERh1MEN7'AL AO~EEOVIENT BETWEEN EACLE
~OUNTY. STA'FE OF COLORADO AND gHE F3OARING FOR9C
li'RANSII' ACENCY
James R. Fritze, Cqunty dlttorney
ACT9ONe Consider approval.
V. UNl'ER(3OdEFiNMEN7AL AGREEMENT FOR TRANSIT SERVICES
Jamgs R. Fritae, County Attorney
ACT8ON: COP1S1d8P ~ppP01/aI.
VO. SIT!£ PLAN AppRO4/t49. AIVHD 6HANGEFB B491LD1IMG APPROVAL
FOR ~~CHNIER-a9ONES FiANCa'ER s~
Dan Rebnolds, Airpvrt a}
A=ON: Considep apprOval. ~
~
, „ . •
I !lffl. CON1"R,~~~ BIE7YlIEEN EAGB.E COlJtilT'Y, S7'A4E OF C4LORAC1O
?4ND. DEPe4RTMENl'.. OF...:TFiANSP0R7°AT6ON.6iEGARD9NG TFIE
-
~ WILLI''S 11.ANE 0NTER5ECTSON
LaPry Me4ternictc, Engineer
~ Ac-rAom: Consider approval.
G:lWPb1lUOC&IJUPIE08JIGE
, I
~
~ I
SENT SY:EAGLE COUNTY ; B- 1-94 ; 13-41 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 3/ 3
.
,
03.00 - 03:9 3 1tERMS OF SALE OF TAX CERTIFIGa4T'IOfV 90-407
Eauia ccmtvamam PEJRSl,1y4NT TO 6$ESOL9.BTION 92-1 26
Sherry Branddn, TreasuPeP
AC"UION° Con$ider approvai.
03:15 - 03.20 ABATEMEN'B' 91EARlNGS
Emomc~,dy nM= i A?von Vllyndfield Inn, Ltd
Schedu!$ number 013905'
oi Basalt partnars ancp The Elk ffiun Singte Family Owners AssoC.
Schedule number tD~25951a 0825978
oii Holly S. Difani, Charles. A. Schudder, Caralyn S. Miller ared Jean
L_ Scuddev
Schedule number 016475
.
A11era Black, Assessor.,
AC~YYOONo Table vnt61 June 27. 1994 at` •00 p_an.
y ~
~ . , ......LL.__.....~..:..~_..W,~:..___~ ..~:.W~..:.~
03:20 - 03:25 , RES~.Ll9T9CiN,ADOP71R9qA:.; pPi.ERIIEfVTARY B9JDGET
Eacb ~ufav Aw, A6VD APpROPRtATING OF AN`I`iCIPATED REVENUES FOR
FISC~L YEAR 1994 AND AU'THORIZING TRAAISFER , OF
i ~ BIJDCEfED ANL) ApPROPR1eR ED RAONEYS BETWEEN VARlOlJS
; ~~~~~IIMG AGENCIES
I A11en Sartin, Finance ~ 4
I ACY8ON: Cpnsidet approval.
03:25 - 03:35 A. PUBLIC HEARING FtEGARDIN PROIi1BBTING 'd'HE
lo0leGkwmYflvom DISCHeARGE OF FIFtEARMS MTHIh! SBJB[~IVISIDNS LOCATED
~ W9THsN UNINCORPOMtATED EAGLE CDlJNTY ~
, ~Mary Jo Bprer,at0, Deputy Caunty Akt4rney
d~CT9OM: Gonsider apprnval.
0. RESOd.4DTl~N PROHlBETlNG. TFlE DISCHAR~',,IE OF FIREee1FtMS
W91fH1NSU13DIV9StUNS @.OCAiEI3 V4lITNI161 tyjlllIdCORPORA'$`ElD
IEAGLE COUNT4f
' iViary Jo Berenate~ De ty County Attnrney
AC'~~ON: Consider approval. . .
03:35 - OPEIM MEET6iVG
FaOk CmmtY Ra4m
. , r
7HE N[Xf M¢T1MG or- mt tnrr.e coiaurv CqWNP16310NLRS VWLL b6' imui oN .naA 13, IFWs
Th6E AGCrQM I:i MW¢]4U FOa NtlFOtii1An770ryqL pURPOSCS QMLY • ALL 161AE5 ANF ApPflQP(IMATC.
TIM BOARf) Wt44t fN 8E9SION PqAY CONSDEIi QiHFA ITFMB It1A1 RRE BROUGHT BOORE R.
C:11NP51lD0CSUUNEO6AGE
`
. ; RCH 1994
4VAIL VA1'LLB~l.J SINESS
TO u~l ~~~EW
May 31, 1994 Welcome to another issue of the Vail Business Review. This edition examines March 1994
sales tax collections for all filers and the first quarter of 1994.
Overall March sales tax increased by 12.6% evith Retail increasing by 15.0%, Lodging by
10.4%, Food and Beverage by 13.9% and Other (which includes anything not in the previous
categories) by 8.4%. The first yuarter resulted in a 3.2% increase overall with Retail increasing by
4.1%, Lodging by 1.6%, Food and Beverage by 3.5% and Other by 6.1%.
Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax
collections, as opposed to acflaal gross sales.
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at 479-2116 or Sally Lorton at
479-2125.
Sincerely,
Steve Thompson
Finance Director
I
, MARCH SALES TAX .
- VA/L 101LLAGE
MARCH NiARCH MARCH
1993 1994 %
Collections Collections Chan e
. :
Retail 5t~~' ~ . . .
+Q~'+~
,
~
Lodging
~ 3 '1, !~4'~ .
7~
Food &
. .
Beverage 316,A66 Other ~ . y . . .
.
• . . ;
Total
LAOMSIyEAD
MARCH MARCH MARCH
1993 1994 %
Collections Collections Chan e
R@tell 937'J'TZ'3 180,$67 . "
'1,:~.~1'°~~?.;
.
. .
Lodging 6,.140:
.
- .
ood & .
F ~ :
. .
-
Beverage . 223 2
:
Other : 624-
Tota l : 41 934 'f 0
' ~ ~ ~
~~J~v~~~ V~Lff~~~~/~~~~ 1~~~~~7~/tl~J~O~G/YI/~~~ 1/~I~
~~~(~6~ f~/~~~6~ ~/AR~~iI
~9~~ ~~94 %
~~9@e~~o~~t~ ~o~lectoons ~~an e
:::e::.~
. . :,.~:'~;;<i'
~
~ . : : : : : : : : : ~ , . . . . . . . • ~ f:.`:: ' ~ .
~ ~y /
~t~ 0 0
~ •
:::-::::~~:.;::,.:.:.;::•.•::~.•.:..~;~.:;~:•:.~.~,•,:.,..`~~~.f6~,+~~,,;:,,;::•::~::~.:•:;:::,::::;.;.::::.:,.:;.~!~!:~::.! .
,:(::,,,:{,;~~;~,~i:~:..; ~ i;~,:~;::~, `'::::i~::;~~: ~i.:~~:.~:.:::a~-,...~i.:..;, ~.r.r_..;~;:;::=.,.;:,:c .::..::..::::~.};~:;;;:;:~:,,:i:,'!:''::,::::;?:;;:::,~:~.~~:~.~.~._~~.;`~.~'~~,;,~,`~:.
~ '
~d
9 ~ : ~~~~Q~ : . ~.s$q~~s .
~ ~
~o~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~`:~:::t::~{~l:;,:;.,~;.~(;~~~:::;:::.;~?;?.:;-:~:;ri~:~~}~~`:`:-f~:`:;;:;;~::~~:~~::~;i':;;::~i::~~:~:.::`.::~r::~':::~~:~'r:;~~;':;:.:~~;;:"'~`~`_`';:_''~;:;';:'i``i;';:::~:':`~'::i;:?:~:~:~;;:~:i::i~(:>::~::;:~::.::,::';:;,"i:><:>,.,~:c:rii~:~~,:~::`~`~~}~~>;':::~:>
~ea
g . . . ~2g~~~ . , : . : ~~`~,.~"'1~,.::
. . . . . ! e3~
.~r:;~~~ •~1_~.}.y~ ~,.r{:.i.'.7?i,?'r_~:{~jt:;r:,;C_(:n,.~,. ;;r,r~~~~~,~:~;~,~,.~~:,.~r.:•:~:.~~.: :~~~`.I:';:>; ~:;~~>4~:%:;~~~.:: '~:_~:::::~;7::>::~~r:)i?.:`:'~,.~::~<:!'.`;i i;,:,>!::`:~;~:~,:,:~~:;;.:~:i,~:~:::`~r;.
~~i3 P
~ ~
...~~0~~0,_,
~ ~ . . . . , . . :.,:;.~;..;,~.~:~•'i~:.~'~;~:.
Q g
~ .,:..~g~~~... . :.i.•.~~i+/~~8~~.~.;:':?:;?::~.':,.;;~:'''r:i<.:;:r.,:;:r:.:;?:•r[''^.':C'r:
. 4:. :c:: ; . ' t;:t ri'r'r • i :i:.,,:,:;. .~a~.
I I ~
11~0~~~~ ~C~If~~Ull IIYtlB'9R'~~Ifll
~~9~ %
~OB~~C~0~~11~ ~O~~~C~901~~ ~~'1~~1 ~
. . . . .
> . . . . . . . . . . . . .
; , o.,.': ;
~ ~
~~~U~
~ . . . :q~~ . . . . . . : . . : : : :3.~P~: I~ .
.
~ ~
~
: : : ~ < : _ : .
9 ~1 . : : :::;::;~;~C~;~~;:::.<:':`::;:`::::::;:':~<r4,~~,>
~ , ~ .
~o~l .
~
;
C~ .
: : . .
e~ ~
. . . ...,:~~J.>:::::~~,~:~:':: : ;,;,;;,;;,;,>,,;':';;:i:_:;
~ ~
a
~ : . : . . . . . . . . . . . : .55~~6:1~ :
. . ; ' ' . - , : : : , : ' ; : : : `<<.`::
p ~
e
"':'.'_.'::~~y~:,.~ .............:...:.....`~Q~i~~~.,.,::::.::::.>::>.:::>:::,:t.<.:.:c::c:;~a:;:. ~
, 4R..
.
: : . . , ` ; ; ,,;:":::;.`:`;t::~:::<;<:;`".; q`y`.>' ¢"`./y'`'
~ ~
~
. . . °~9 ,J1~`~J~
. . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . : : : : : : : : : : : ~34~Q34
. . ' . . . . ~`~PPPO/ /~Y'::,
s
MARCH SALES TAX
TOTAL
MARCH NlARCH NBARCH
1993 1994 %
Collections Collections Chan e
Retail
. .
Lodging 82Q~257:
~
. .
Food & . ,
. . . . .
Beverage ~#3'~
~
. . .
Other ~
~~L.9.,~33:..;.: 8•~~'~'o;
.
Tota l .
t,988,Q8v: : .123~,5~~
0
RETA~~ SU MARY
1VIARCH 1VIARCH 1VIARCH
1993 1994 %
COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE
FOOD 104,430 111,542 6.8%
DRUG 3,751 4,124 9.9%
LIQUOR 21,725 24,119 11.0%
CLOTHING 743699 77,946 4.3% '
SPORT 303,073 357,956 18.1%
JEWELRY 33,787 37,810 11.9%
GIFT 38,575 39,639 2.8% '
T-SHIRT 53,436 67,540 26.4%
FUR 1,419 4,401 210.1% ,
GALLERY 7,358 7,249 -1.5% '
OTHER 76,139 93,480 22.8%
HOME ~55 395 11.3% OCCUPATION
TOTAIL 718,747 826,201 15.0% I
n
i
1994 YTD SALES TAX
VA/L 10/LLAGE
YTD YTD YTD
1993 1994 %
Collections Collections Chan e
.
.
Retail 1 ~'f 9 5 ~
. . , . . . . s. . . ~
.
:
Lodgin9 : 06
. .
Food & , . . . .
: .
:
Beverage
Otfl@1' 004
~ .
Total 3~06.~~ 3
L/OIIISHEAD
YTD YTD - YT'D
1993 1994 %
Collections Collections Chan e
:
Reta i I : 415,456 8,t180
Lodging ~ 60,9,237
sQ1 ,028
.
,
Food & ,
~
Beverage 2'I~226 ,2
:
Other
'~~4
. .
Tota I : :246
: rt ~~7
. ~
9 ~ 4 YTD SALES TAX
V SCADE VILLAGEj~ ~~IL/ SANDST 9 A EST VAIL
u TD YTD u
1993 1994 %
Coolect aons Col lections Chan e
.
. . . . : . .
Retau0 36*3,*622:
, • • . . . . . . . . y . . .
. .
L 0
dgang
Food &
Beverage 71
a
;
. . .
.
.
O$heP
y
ToW ~g @ ,
i~i~~~~€D~
$
OUT OF TOII9a
u ~~D
1~~3 1994 %
Co80ectaon~ ~oNections Chartge
. .
. ,
~
RetaH 69q5~~
. . ,
.
~odging A,5,47~
. , . .
Food & .
.
. . . ,
Beverage
. . .
. :
. .
OtheP 3~~,s~~
. . ,
. : . : .
ToW ~9~~T8~
i ~
1994 YTD SALES TAX ~
~ rorAL '
YTD YTD YTD
1993 1994 % ;
Collections Collections Chan e
~ . .
Reta i I 3~~830
Lod9in9
. Q91
. # ~542 ~~914~~~C
Food & ~ ~ . .
Beverage ~4
; : . . . . . . * 0~0~
. . . .
Other . 3$0-,335.
. . . . . .
Total S,G7~4gZ99, . .
~
~ .
,
~
,
,
i
I
~
;
' .
~
~
0
RETAIL SdJ MMARY
YTD YTD YTD
1993 1994 %
COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHAIVGE
FOOD 296,750 309,690 4.4% '
DRUG 11,409 10,519 -7.8%
LIQUOR 60,149 61,850 2. 8%
CLOTHING 215,558 211,941 -1 7%
SPORT 853,269 888,366 4.1% '
JEWELRY 92,309 89,513 -3.0%
GIFT 112,836 105,771 -6.3%
T-SHIRT 154,814 173,692 12.2% !
FUR 12,436 12,868 3.5%
GALLERY 23,494 19,261 -18.0% '
OTHER 220,201 254,185 15.4%
HOME 1,067 1,174 9.9%
OCCUPATION
TOTA11L. 2.054.292 2,138,830 4.1%
r
1
'I'own of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 \
.
`~e4
T0WN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21 DO
FAX 303-479-2157
FOR 9MAA~~~ATE RELEASE
May 27, .1994
Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn
Community Information Office
BUBLDUNG PERM@TS ISSUED BY THE TOVVN OF VAIL
The follovving building permifis have been issued through the Town of Vail Communify
Developmen4 for the period iViay 20-27:
Telemark, 1090 Vail View Dr., pool repair, $22,000, fVlaximum Comfort.
Smith Residence (Cornice Building), 362 Vail Valley Dr., nevv
residence, $262,000, Gary Bossow.
Telemark #18, 1081 Lionsridge Loop, alteration, $35,000, Pinyon Builders.
Lions Square Lodge #154, 660 W. Lionshead Place, alteration, $2,000,
Gray-Stone Construction.
Casa Del Sol condos, 2065 W. Gore Creek Dr., reroof, $104,000, Grand County
Roofing.
Sundial Phase I, 5037 Main Gore Dr., $198,000, Michael Lauterbach, nevv residence.
# # #
6748
NO COUNC9L WORK SESSIOR9 ON TUESDAV
Next week is a rare fifth Tuesday, and thus, no Council work session or evening
meeting. The schedule will resume June 7 with a 2 p.m. work session, followed by the
regular evening meeting at 7:30 p.m. For more information, contact fhe Town Clerk's
Office at 479-2136.
# # #
\ e4 ,
TO6VN OF VA1L
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157
FOR 9MMEDsATE RELEASE
iViay 27, 1994
Confact: Tom Collins, 479-2346
Vail PD Communications Manager
VA9L D95PATCH CENTER PREPARES FOR tIflOVE TO NEUV POL6CE ADDIT90N°
PORTABLE BACa(-UP SYSTEM TO FIANDLE EMERGENCY SERi/ICES
(Vail)--A $300,000, 34-foot mobile communications center vvill be rolling info Vail nexf
week fio provide emergency dispatch services while Vail's permanent system is moved
to the new police addition. The back-up system will be provided by the Colorado State
Patrol and is expected to be in use for five days to assist with the transition. No
interruptions in emergency service are anticipated.
Vail's public safety communications center is currently located in the lower level of the
flnunicipal Building. The cen4er provides dispatch services for police, fire and
ambulance from Vail to Wolcott.
Preparations for the move have been undervvay for the last three weeks, according to
Tom Collins, communications manager for the Vail Police Department. "We've already
installed cabling for the radio, telephone, computer-aided dispatch and the alarm
monitoring systems," said Collins. "On Tuesday, we'll start moving the computers and
other equipmen4."
(more)
Dispatch/Add 1
Although Collins says the move is extremely complex, he's hoping the new dispatch
center will be fully operational by the end of next week. "We want to extend our
appreciation to the Colorado State Patrol for loaning us the back-up system during the
project," said Collins.
The new dispatch center has been designed to accommodate up to four console
stations. Two consoles are in use today with a minimum staffing level of two
dispatchers per shift.
Soon, other Police Department offices will be moving to the new 12,000 square foot
wing to make room for renovation of the department's existing space, about 6,000
square feet.
Completion of the $3.5 million project is anticipated by Sept. 1. Parking will be
accommodated beneath the building and in a surface lot totaling 47 spaces (the same
number of spaces prior to construction). s
# # # Media Note: The mobile communications center will be parked on
the northeast side of the police expansion. Please contact Tom Collins at
479-2346 for photo opportunities or additional information.
~
.
u
e4
TOWW OF YAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157
FOR OflAMEDBATE RELEASE
May 26, 1994
Contact: Russell Forrest, 479-2138
Senior Environmental Planner
PUBLOC COMMEP9T SOUC;FiT ON EPIVIROIVIIAERITAL STRAT'EGIC PLAN:
DRAFT TO BE PRESEIVTED AT JUIVE 2 PIIBLOC MEETINC
(Vail)--The Town of Vail is inviting public comment on an environmental strategic plan for
the town. A draft will be outlined at a public forum beginning at 7 p.m. next Thursday (6-2) in
the Vail Town Council Chambers. The meeting will include a brief overview by Russell
Forrest, the touvn's senior environmental planner. Participants will then break into small
groups to discuss sections of the plan.
The purpose of the plan, says Forrest, is to develop a long-range environmental work plan
for the town. The effort began in earnest last fall when the town arranged an environmental
conference with representation from area businesses, neighborhoods, interest groups,
schools and area governmental entities. Input from the conference has been compiled and
incorporated into the draft.
Basic components of the plan include a vision statement, goal areas, objectives and
specific actions on such topics as: waste management; sustainable economic development;
habitat protection and improvement in Gore Creek; energy conservation; and ecosystem
protection.
The document is expected to be presented to fihe Town Council for approval in July.
For more information, or to review the draft in advance of the presentation, contact Forrest
at 479-2138.
# # #
.
eg
TOWN OF UAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157
FOR UMMEDBATE R[~~EASE .
iVlay 27, 1994
Contact: Jeff Bowen, 476-2701
Jonathan Staufer, 476-5622
iViike Mollica, 479-2138
Todd Oppenheimer, 479-2161
~~LUNTEERS NEEDED FOR °'TREES FOR VA9L°° PLANT'ING ON .9UNE 12
(Vail)--Volunteers are being requested for Vail's third annual community tree planting
projecf scheduled for Sunday, June 12. Organizers are hoping to enlist 200 volunteers
to help plant dozens of trees and shrubs at designated spots along I-70.
The effort, known as Trees for Vail, represents a public-private partnership to help
beautify the I-70 corridor. iVlore than 500 saplings, shrubs and full-grovvn trees have
been planted as a result of previous efforts.
This year, the planting of about 200 trees and shrubs will be staged along the
eastbound ramp of the Main Vail interchange and will include a variety of vegetation,
including Quaking Aspen, Pinyon Pine, Plum, Dogwood, Choke-Cherry and Buffalo-
Berry. The transplants will be linked to an irrigation system maintained by the Town of
Vail.
Funding fior the 1994 project is made possible through a grant from the Colorado
State Forest Service and contributions from the Vail-Eagle Valley Rotary Club, the
Town of Vail and private donors.
(more)
Trees for Vail/Add 1
Volunteers of all ages are encouraged to participate. Each recruit will receive a Trees
for Vail t-shirt and will be treated to a box lunch and a barbecue at the end of the day.
No advance registration is needed. Volunteers are asked to meet at 8:30 a.m.
Sunday, June 12, at the Vail Municipal Building, 75 S. Frontage Rd.
For more information, contact the town's Community Development Office at 479-
2138.
# # #
~eg
TOW+I OF VAIL
75 Sou1h Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157
FOR VMMEDBATE RELEASE
May 30, 1994
Contact: Bob McLaurin, (303) 479-2105 or (303) 476-7388, home
Town Manager ~
MACH PLACED 0N ADMIN6STRATBi/E LEe4VE EOLLOWING SFIOOTING;
RES9GNi4TION FFi0M TOVNN'S EiVIPLOVIVIEfVT SCHEDl1LED FOR JULV
(Vail)--Town of Vail Personnel Manager Bob Mach, who was scheduled to leave
the town's employment in July, has been placed on administrative leave following
the shooting death of Mach's wife, Mimi. The action was announced today (5-30)
by Vail Town Manager Bob fVlcLaurin.
Mach's administrative leave is effective Tuesday (5-31) and will continue through
the course of the investigation, or until the effective date of Mach's resignation
from the town, fVlcLaurin said.
McLaurin said the town had accepted Mach's written resignation on May 12.
"He approached me a few weeks ago, saying he would like to resign to pursue
other interests," McLaurin said. "I had accepted his resignation and we were
discussing that his last day would be July 1 5."
Mach has been employed by the town since 1991, managing a variety of
personnel activities for the town's 205 employees. Before joining the town, Mach
was a European human resource development and training manager for Digital
Equipment Corporation in Geneva, Switzerland.
(more)
Mach/Add 1
The investigation into Mimi Mach's death is being handled by the Eagle County
Sheriff's Office. For investigation information, contact the Sheriff's Office at (303)
328-8500. -
"This is a tragic situation and we all want to express our heartfelt sorrow to the
f families involved," said McLaurin.
A counselor from Colorado West Mental Health will be available to visit with
town employees beginning Tuesday (5-31) morning, McLaurin said.
# # #
Media lVote: Mach is pronounced Mack.
:
MEMOF6ANDUM
TO: Towaa Council, Community Development, Bob McLaurin and Town
Planners
FROM: Kristan Pritz
DATE: March 15, 1994 - Redised June 2, 1994
SUBJECT: Summary of project priorities from the discussion with the Vail Town
Council on March 8, 1994, arad Nlay 21, 9994.
Below is a summary of the priorities determined by the Vail Town Council:
1. Building Division.
A. Sierra Computer Implementation
B. Community Education on the Development Review Process
The above priorities will be completed within the next six to nine months. The
community education on development reviewr is an ongoing effort.
II. Environmental Division.
A. Implementation of the Environmental Strategic Plan, to be completed
within the next six months
B. Open Lands Plan Implementation, ongoing
C. Air Quality, ongoing
D. V1/ater Quality, ongoing E. Solid VUaste Management Policy, to be completed within the next three
months
F. Environmental Excellence Award, to be initiated within the next three
months G. Food Handlers Education Program, to be completed within the next six
months
1
.
i_ Second Tier Priorities
•Environmental lmpact Report Zoning Code Amendment
•Tree Ordinance
•Nazardous Waste Policy/Program
III. Planning
A. First Tier Priorities
1. Vail Commons Site, RFP to be completed by the end of March,
1994
2. Hausing Authority Discussion, to be scheduled in early April,
topics to include the mortgage pool, purchase of existing units,
Vail Das Schone project, Lion's Ridge project, and Vail
Commons project. It was decided that if the Housing Authority
develops any additional projects beyond Vail Commons, a
consultant would be necessary to work with the Board.
3. Art in Public Places Board, ongoing efforts include foltow-up on
the "Exuberance" mural at the Vail Transportation Center,
schematic design for Vail Transportation Center for new lights,
Temporary Exhibit Program, Mural at the Vail Transportation
Center involving school children, participation in Save Outdoor
Sculpture, investigation of percent for Art Program, dedication of
Terre Haute, and maintenance of existing artwork. It was
decided that the staff should look into the possibiliry of having a
part-time person staff this board as opposed to the Community
Development Department.
4. Adoption of the Land Ownership Adjustment Plan, to be
completed within the next three months - Completed NVay, 1994.
5. Employee Housing Amendment, to be completed within the next
three months
6. Lindholm Land Exchange, angoing - Resolution, June 21, 1994.
7. Organization of State APA Conference, ongoing
8. Vail Associates Category III Review, ongoing
9. Gondola/Sunbird Redevelopment effort, ongoing
10. Village Loading and Delivery Plan, ongoing
2
d
11. Cemetery Master Plan implementation, the Council decided that
this item needs to put on their agenda to determine a funding
source. Dalton VUilliams and others from the Cemetery Task
Force should be invited to this meeting.
B. Secoead T6er Praorities These projects will not be started until, at a minimum, a new planner is
hired and has been on board for one month and the Vail Commons
project is underway.
1. Open Space Code Amendments - initiate immediately.
' 2. SDD Comprehensive Review - inatiate October 1994 after
Open Space Revisiorts are cornpleted. Councal votetl 5-2 to
not impose a anoratoraum on SDD. 3. Void 250 Ordinance, 5 votes, 9-12 month timeline.
C. TIhiGdl 4GeP PPiori$ies
The Council revised the list of projects in this category and voted for
their top five choices on May 97th, 1994. The following projects were
re-praorafized:
9. Amend the Hillside Residential zone ciistrict to require larger
lo6s and possA4/ly I'G.7s GH"9FP9y 5 vO6P..7y 6 mon6C0 timeline.
2. Voidl 250 OrcJinances, 5votes, 9-12 month timeline.
3. Arneead 4he Lionshead Urban Design Considerations in
reBation to window design, American Disability Act
irmplications for design, issue of alpine character,
aliscourage splif level retaol, e4c., 5 votes, 9month timeline.
4. Amend the parking pay-in-Eaeu areas and investigate
possib9e loading pay-in-9ieu concepty 4 vOIQ.Sy 12 month
timeline.
4. Arnend Subdivision Regulations 4o disallow nninor
subdidisions in existing subd'ovisions that result on Bncreased
lots, 4 eotes, 6 anonth timeline.
4. Remode condominium coraversion sectaon of the Subdivasioo~
Regulatfonsy 4 do6esy 3 monLh timeline.
5. Newspaper Boxes, 2 votes, 9t0 92 month timeline.
3
F
4
6. Four New View Corridors, 1 votes, 12 month timeline.
The following projects received votes but did not make the top six
category:
•Nonconforming signs, 2 votes
•Review of private parking practices, 0 votes
-Creation of a Hospital zone district, 0 votes
•Trash enclosure requirement, 2 votes
•Utilities Master Plan, this project was seen as being a Public
Warks project if pursued and did not receive any votes.
IV. Other Comments:
•Do not limit current planning applications
•Loot at an additional planning position funded from an increase in development fees •Look at sign code enforcement transferring to Police
•Agreed Community Development could hire another PEanner I, with'out
increasing builaiing fees - insteacf, Council would increase fees with new code
adoption - planners to review most recent fee increases with the council writhin 2
months.
4
r
1
MERAOFiAPlDUM
TO: Town Council, Community Development, Bob McLaurin and Town
Planners
FROM: Kristan Pritz
DATE: March 15, 1994 - Redised June 2, 1994
SUBJECT:. Summary of project priorities from the discussion with the, Vail Town
Council on March 8, 1994, and May 29, 1994. .
Below is a summary of the priorities determined by the Vail Town Council:
1. Building Division.
A. Sierra Computer Implementation
B. Community Education on the Development Review Process
The above priorities will be completed within the next six to nine months. The
community education on development review is an ongoing effort.
II. Environmental Division.
A. Implementation of the Environmental Strategic Plan, to be completed
within the next six months
B. Open Lands Plan Implementation, ongoing
C. Air Quality, ongoing
D. Water Quality, ongoing
E. Solid 11Vaste Management Policy, to be completed within the next three
months
F. Environmental Excellence Award, to be initiated within the next three
months
G. Food Handlers Education Program, to be completed within the next six
months
1
1
Second Tier Priorities
•Environmental Impact Report Zoning Code Amendment
•Tree Ordinance
•Hazardous Waste Policy/Program
III. Planning
A. First Tier Priorities
1. Vail Commons Site, RFP to be completed by the end of March,
1994 _
2. Housing Authority Discussion, to be scheduled in early April,
topics to include the mortgage pool, purchase of existing units,
Vail Das Schone project, Lion's Ridge project, and Vail
Commons project. It was decided that if the Housing Authority
develops any additional projects beyond Vail Commons, a
consultant would be necessary to work with the Board.
3. Art in Public Places Board, ongoing efforts include follow-up on
the "Exuberance" mural at the Vail Transportation Center,
schematic design for Vail Transportation Center for new lights,
Temporary Exhibit Program, Mural at the Vail Transportation
Center involving school children, participation in Save Outdoor
Sculpture, investigation of percent for Art Program, dedication of
Terre Haute, and maintenance of existing artwork. It was
decided that the staff should look into the possibility of having a
part-time person staff this board as opposed to the Community
Development Department.
4. Adoption of the Land Ownership Adjustment Plan, to be
completed within the next three rnonths - Cornpleted NAay, 1994.
- 5. Employee Housing Amendment, to be completed within the next
three months
6. Lindholm Land Exchange, ongoing - Resolution, June 21, 1994.
7. Organization of State APA Conference, ongoing
8. Vail Associates Category III Review, ongoing
9. Gondola/Sunbird Redevelopment effort, ongoing
10. Village Loading and Delivery Ptan, ongoing
2
s,
d
0
11. Cemetery Master Plan implementation, the Council decided that
this item needs to put on their agenda to determine a funding
source. Dalton Williams and others from the Cemetery Task
Force should be invited to this meeting. IlAeeting occurred on
May 3rd. Couracil determaned that a ballot question should
Ibe prepared by staff to determirae if communety vuants the
cemetery (this was uncEear) and seconcily how the cemetery
should be funded.
B. SeCOP?d T9eP PPIOPI$IeS
These projects will not be started until, at a minimum, a new planner is
hired and has been on board for one month and the Vail Commons
project is underway.
1. Open Space Code Amendments - initiate immediately.
2. SDD Comprehensive Review - initiate October 1994 after
Open Space Revisions are comp9eted. Couracil voted 5-2 to
nof impose a moratoriaam on SDD.
C. Thiro1 Tier Priorities
The Council revised the tist of projects in this category and voted for
their top five choices on May 17th, 9994. The following projects were
re-prioritized:
1. Amend the Hillside Resodential zone distric4 4o require Iarger
lo4s and possibly less GRFA, 5 dotes, 6 month tirneline.
2. !loid 250 Ordinances, 5 votes, 9-1 2 month timeline.
3. Arnend 4he Lionshead Urbaw DesBgn Considerations in
relation to dvirtdovv desigrt, APnerican DisabilBty Ac4
irnplica4ions for design, issue of alpine character,
discourage split level retail, etc., 5 votes, 9 month tirneline.
4. Amend the parking pay-in-l6eu areas and investigate
possible loading pay-in-lie[a concepty vOIP.sy 92 month
tirneline.
4. Amend Subdivision Regulations to ciisallow minor
subdivisions in existirtg subdevisoons that resulf in increased
lotsy 4 tloLesy 6 moIIIh LiIIIeliIIes
4. Rerriove condorninium condersion section o$ the Subdivision
IRegulations, 4 dotes, 3 month timeline.
3
.»r
i
5. Wewspaper Boxes, 2 votes, 9 to 12 month timeline. .
, 6. Four IVew View Corridors, 1 vates, 12 month timeline.
, The following projects received votes but did not make the top six
category:
•Nonconforming signs, 2 votes
•Review of private parking practices, 0 votes .
•Creation of a Hospital zone district, 0 votes
, •Trash enclosure requirement, 2 votes . -Utilities Master Plan, this project was seen as being a Public
Works project if pursued and did not receive any votes.
IV. Other Comments~
•Do not limit current planning applications
•Loot at an additional planning position funded from an increase in development fees
•Look at sign code enforcement transferring to Police
•Agreed Community Development could hire another Planner I, without
increasing building fees - instead, Council would increase fees with new code
adoption - planners to review most recent fee increases with the council within 2 .
months.
4
G.0p~~
~ >
National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Officers
League Washington, D.C. President
O} 20004 Sharpe James
Cities (202) 626-3000 Mayor, Newark, New Jersey
First Vice President
Fax: (202) 626-3043 Carolyn Long eanks
Councilwoman-at-Large, Atlanta, Georgia
Second Vice President
March 28, 1994 Hal Conklin
Mayor, Santa Barbara, California
Immediate Past President
Glenda E. Hood
Mayor, Orlando, Florida
Executive Director
De1r MilyOC: Donald J. Borut
I am writing this letter to the leaders of our nation's cities and towns to encourage you to lead your
community in observing Flag Day on June 14, and to join with other communities throughout America
in this year's 15th annual "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance."
Whether seen at Olympic ceremonies to honor our medal winners, flying atop the White House, or
leading the way for a high school marching band, no symbol represents our ideals so immediately and
universally as the American flag. The Pledge of Allegiance has become just as enduring a statement
about our nation as the flag it honors; it is an affirmation of our shared beliefs and national spirit.
The "Pause for the Pledge" is a call for Americans everywhere to join in reciting the Pledge of
Allegiance at 7 p.m. EDT on Flag Day. Conceiverl in 1980 by the National Flag Day Foundation in
Baltimore, this annual event has gained widespread support from the President and Congress, from state
and local leaders, and civic, business, service, and educational groups nationwide. The "Pause for the
Pledge of Allegiance" was made an official Flag Day ceremony by an Act of Congress in 1985.
President Clinton has been invited to lead this year's national "Pause for the Pledge" at Fort McHenry
in Baltimore, where Francis Scott Key wrote the "Star Spangled Banner" during the War of 1812.
And once again, youth representatives will carry the flags of all 50 states as part of the ceremony.
In its effort to spread the word about Flag Day and the Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance, the National
Flag Day Foundation and its operating arm, the Natiqnal Flag Day Committee, have prepared a very
useful set of materials about activities, background, promotional ideas, sample resolution, participants,
checklists and other suggestions for organizing local Flag Day events. If you would like to obtain this
information for your community, please till out the enclosed request sheet from the National Flag Day
Committee and send it to the address appearing on the Flag Day letterhead. I hope you can join in
organizing and helping to lead this unifying event in your community on Flag Day, 1994.
Sincerely,
7 pe James, esi nt
Mayor of Newark, ew Jersey
enclosure
Past Presidents: Sidney Barthelemy, Mayor, New Orleans, Louisiana • Ferd Harrison, Mayor, Scotland Neck, North Carolina • Cathy Reynolds, Councilwoman-at-Large, Denver, Colorado •
Directors: Lucy T. Allen, Mayor, Louisburg, North Carolina • Ann Azari, Mayor, Fort Cpllins, Colorado • Lock Beachum, Sr., Councilman, Youngatown, Ohio • Don Benninghoven, Executive
Director, League of Calitornia Cities • Jimmy Burke, Mayor, Deer Park, Tezas • Anthony Capizzi, City Commissioner, Dayton, Ohio • Carl Classen, Executive Director, Wyoming Association of
Municipalities • E. W. Cromartie, II, Councilman, Columbia, South Carolina • Charles A. DeVaney, Mayor, Augusta, Georgia • John Divine, Commissioner, Salina, Kansas • William Evers,
Mayor, Bradenton, Florida • Marlin Gipson, Alderman, North Little Rock, Arkansas • Robert R. Jefferson, Councilmember, Lexington, Kentucky • Steven E. Jeffrey, Executive Director,
Vermont League of Cities and Towns • Walter F. Kelly, Town Council President, Fishers, Indiana • Abbe Land, Mayor Pro Tem, West Hollywood, California • Gregory Lashutka, Mayor,
Columbus, Ohio • Sheila Jackson Lee, Councilmember-at-Large, Houstor., Texas • Ilene Lieberman, Mayor, Lauderhill, Florida • Sylvia L. Lovely, Execu[ive Direc[or, Kentucky League of
Cities • Millie MacLeod, Council Member, Moorhead, Minnesota • Maryann Mahaftey, City Council President, Detroit, Michigan • Thomas M. Menino, Mayor, Boston, Massachusetts •
Thomas F. Morales, Jr., Vice Mayor, Avondale, Arizona • J. Ed Morgan, Mayor, Hattiesburg, Mississippi • Kathryn Nack, Vice Mayor, Pasadena, California • James P. Nic, Mayor, Fairhope,
Alabama - Mary Pinkett, Council Member, New York, New York • Sharon Priest, City Director, Little Rock, Arkansas • Carolyn Ratto, Council Member, Turlock, California • Bill Revell, Mayor,
Dyersburg, Tennessee • L. Lynn Rex, Executive Director, League of Nebraska Municipalities • Alicia M. Sanchez, Councilmember, Port Huron, Michigan • Raymond C. Sittig, Executive
Director, Florida League of Cities • Woodrow Stanley, Mayor, Flint, Michigan • Frank Sturzl, Executive Director, Texas Municipal League • Dan Thompson, Executive Director, League of
Wisconsin Municipalities • Max W. Wells, Councilmember, Dallas, Texas • Jim W. White, Councilmember, Kent, Washington • Jack B. Williams, Mayor, Franklin Park, Illinois
Recycled Paper
'Miw
~AMNALFLAGD~~ ~~~~~PMON, RNCo
418 South Broadway * Baltimore„ Maryland 21231 * (410) 563-FLAG
Hillary Rodham Clinton ~QUIESll"OR FLA"" DA" llNll ORMAll llGN
Honorary National Chair
Pause (or the Pledge
o( Allegiance Program
President ~ National Flag Day Committee
Louis V. Koerber 418 South Broadway
President
Budeke's Paints. Inc. Balt11710re MD 21231
Vice President
Richard M. Patterson, CLU ChFC
Patterson-Imbach & Associates, Inc.
Treasurer Yes, 1 would like to receive your informational materials
H. Victor Rieger, Ir.
Executive Vice President about organizing Flag Day events and having my
Signet Bank community join with other cities and towns in the PAUSE
Setretary
ceorge e Tnomsen, e5g FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
McKenney. Thomsen & Burke
Directors:
lohn W. Felton Please send your materials to:
Vice President
Corporate Communications
McCormick & Company
George V McGowan
Chairman, Executive Committee -
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. ! name \
l I
James McManus (Jim McKay)
Sports Commentator/lournalist
ABCTelevision Network
Earl S. Richardson. Ed.D.
President
Morgan State Universi[y ( title )
Brooks Robinson
Baseball Hall of Fame
Henry A. Rosenberg, Jr.
Chairman of the Board
Crown Cenval Petroleum
General lohn W. Vessey, )r., ~ 1UUrESS ~
USA (Ret.)
Former Chairman. Joint Chiefs
of Staff. The Pentagon
Mrs. Eldred M. Yochim
Honorary President General
National Sociery Daughters ~ Clty Stclte ZIP eode )
of the American Revolu[ion
Directors Emeiiti:
Herbert E. Witz, Esq. PhOne.
Attomey a[ Law
Dr. Milton S. Eisenhower
(1899-1985)
Please mail this form to the above address or call (410) 563-FLAG.
Anunanall Paun§e 1~oir 'II'he Nedge of All1legnan~e * FLAG DAY USA * June 14, 7 :00 p.m. EDT
ORE HOUSE - VAIL SBD - VAIL, INC. v ~""~'JOHN J. BEAUPRE
BOX 996 Md 1 8 1 9 9 4 PRESIDENT
VAIL. COLORADO 81657 Y ~
303-476-5100-2 LARRY ANDERSON
GENERAL MANAGER
Open letter to the Vail Town Council _2 105A
own of Vail Offices , i
75 South Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657 ~ .
Dear Mayor and Council:
Thank you for the very straightforward consideration of Ore House's awning
project. We are obviously very pleased that it received your approval.
While the economic, business development and community 'focus' elements will
be self-evident, there was not unanimous agreement on the aesthetic
considerations. To this end, we will pay close attention to the overhead heating,
table-top lighting and decor as requested, and keep the setting and railing well
maintained and properly 'flowered' in the summer, and subject to some further
planning, nicely decorated in the winter.
Though we cannot speak for the land owner(s), who at some future date may (or
may not) wish to build out to their property line, as long as we are tenants and
operate the 232 Bridge Street premises, we do and will regard_the space under the
awning as an outside deck, covered, but not (to be) endosed.
In addition to the deck's obvious summer, daytime operation, and to respond
specifically to councilmens' Stauch and Shearer's comments, we would very much
like to establish this deck's function as Vail's first (only?) heated and covered
outdoor space that can operate when possible during the winter and on cooler,
summer evenings as well. As, such, it will/would be a very nice addition to the Old
Town's core. . Thanks again for your consideration.
Sincerely,
.
; .
John J. Be pre _Larry Andelson
Owner - l Owner & 1Vlanager
JJB/P))
•FFIIIATED LOCATiONS.
t SIrvTA FE. On THE PLwSw. S-iA FE nEw nExiCO
2.OUHANGO.COLOR4Dp
3. SIIN VALLEY, ON TME -LI, SUN VAILEY, iDANO
Rn~o.wt Sr~c.~
May 24, 1994
Mr. Walter A. Goff -
221 N. 3rd Street
Frisco, Colorado 80443
Dear Mr. Goffe
We are in receipt of information from a Vail citizen which
indicates that you, or someone driving your vehicle, illegally
deposited several bags of trash and garbage in the area of our East
Vail exit. This incident occurred on the morning of May 11, 1994.
The purpose of this letter is to clarify the laws within the Town
of Vail limits relating to this activity. It is, by law, illegal
to deposit this or any other type of material on any property,
including highway right of ways, without the permission of the
owner. We would, therefore, request that future activity of this
type not occur.
If the information provided .to us as it relates to your vehicle
being at the scene be inaccurate, I would apologize for this
letter. However, we do encourage members of our community to help
us keep Vail a clean and safe place.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
TOWN OF VAIL
Kenneth H. Hughey
Chief of Police
KHH:lw
RECEIVEv 1M.4Y 1 3 1994
Dr. Robert E. Baker
3950 No. Frontage Rd E. # 22
Vail, CO, 81657
May 11, 1994
Mr. Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO, 81657 ~
Dear Mr. McLaurin,
I feel badly that we have not been able to get together, but perhaps it can happen
pretty soon.
I had an interesting experience this morning while taking a pleasant walk. As I
approached the "East Vail Telephone" down the road from our complex, a brownish
Bronco or Blazer drove up ta the stop sign, a nice appearing elderly gentleman got out of
the car and proceeded to unload several bags of trash and garbage. I suggested to him that
this was not a city dump, to which he said that the stuff would be picked up soon, hopped
in the car and drove off. His license number, I am almost certain, is ZR 7762 in case one
is interested.
I looked over the area and realized what he had done was just about right for how
the intersection appears, so I smiled and decided to let you know that even though we
have not been able to get together, I arn expecting the area to be cleaned up and repaired,
and the dead trees removed, new ones planted, the road repaired, and a covered bus
shelter properly placed
It was (is?) to be done this month, and over 113 of May is already escaped with
mighty little showing.
I am planning to be here most of the next few weeks with a few exceptions for
trips to Denver. I would like to meet with you when it is convenient for you since I can
now come almost any time. Please try again. My telephone is 476 0097.
I hope to hear from you I also hope to see the work start very soon.
Sincerely,
Robert E Baker
Copy: Peggy Osterfoss
r ,
~uf :~9~--tw VRFC VAgIL RUGBY FOOTBAg.]L Cg.UB
May 26, 1994
Mayor Peggy Osterfoss
Town Of Vail
75 South Frontage Road, West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mayor Osterfoss:
1VIy name is Gibney 1Vlurphy and I represent the Vail Rugby Club. In October of 1994, The Vail Rugby Football Club will be traveling to Hong Kong and
Singapore for a two week tour at the invitation of the Hong Kong Rugby Club. Not
only is this tour an opportunity for "the boys" to play in an international arena, it is
also a chance for Vail to promote itself in a region that is becoming increasingly
important to our resort economy.
In an effort to sponsor this trip, the Club is asking for help from the community, in
addition to hosting several fund-raisers over the course of the summer. Included in
these is the honor of hosting the Ski Town Rugby Championship, a competition that
brings rugby teams from ski towns all over the United States to Vail.
The Vail Rugby Club would appreciate any financial assistance that the Town of Vail
could extend. Over the past year more than ZO families from Hong Kong have
purchased homes in this area. We feel that our two week tour in Hong Kong would
give the Vail Valley additional exposure tliat could only benefit our community.
We would appreciate any assistance in helping us reach our fundraising goals. The
Tovvn of Vail's support will enable the team to represent Vail in Hong Kong and
Singapore this October.
Should you have any questioxis regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerel ,
. ~
~l
~ ~U
bney Murphy
PO Box 562
Vail, CO 81658
303-926-6464
I
JuN- 2-94 rHU i a: i e ~ X C~ L~
~~4,ii~ ti• P. e i
F..,I
ra : va zL T o~'lN cauN: zL MEMsERs a;~
FRtlM: LLOYD 3C7hiN50N
RE: PAY 70 PRRIC AT F ORD PARK
RS A 5ER50(V PAS..~`~ Fi0 _DER Tq TI-iE TENNIS COURTS 1' USE FOF2D PAF2K
4FTEiV _ I 57ROiVGLY OBTEC f TO I^IAVIhJG TO PAY TO PARIC BEFORE I PAY
TO PLAY.
I WYLL CONST17EF: CAN_ELLrNG M1' PASS AND PLAYING A1" ANOTHEk
FACILI'TY.
. . . . ~ ~%...~.._y.~.:._..,o.=:,.~>,
. . . i L.LOYf3 JOMFISON
~ I
, . ,
,
. , . ' I.. . i . . ' . ~ . . ,
b.
e
s
~
~ C' CGtNI.~r,l~' ~ .
Bc~av~~ ~~~eW Resort Company
O F C O L O R A D O
June 3, 1994
Peggy OsterFoss, Mayor
75 Sou4h Frontage Road
. Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Ms. Osterfoss:
I am a Director of the Beaver Creek Resort Company Board. We are the governing body
for Beaver Creek. The Board has identified a problem that exists within the community.
Rlamely, it is not clear that vve are in existence, and the roll we play. It is for this reason
thaf I would welcome the opportunity to meet with you.
VVe believe that Beaver Creek, as a community, should be recognized and involved in
more community-vvide functions. In addition to this, we believe that the community is
prepared 4o accept its responsibility in the Vail Valley.
I trusf fhat your visit in Rio has been successfiul, and I will look fonnrard to your
contacting me upon your refurn. I can be reached in Beaver Creek at 845-7945. I will
be in Nevv Jersey June 4th 4hrough June 13th and can be reached at (201) 376-1800.
V~ truly yours, ~
t I
;
iVielvin D. Marx
MDM:kp
Preserving and enhancing the values of the community
and the quality of life!
P.O. Box 915 o Avon, Colorado 81620 o (303) 949-5750
~
~ ~ C> Gt
"OF
a-
.APA' °
; - , Co~~ Plannin . - a tters • • • _
. ~
= . PA RA DIS~ ~ NOTNECESSARILY LOST
• AN URBAN OASIS F9GHTS ON .
Profecting lit4fefon's Soufh PiaPte Parlc. 'A t
by Tony Chacon, AICP
Senior PlanneP, Littlefon :
he year 1965 - Littleton and the south Metro Area
' is ravaged by the great South Platte River flood of -
1965, resutting in the U.S. Corp of Engineers pians _
to construct Chatfield Dam and channelize the river.
The nature of the proposed improvemenfis was of pro-: '
found interest to Littieton, since more than four miles
of the river lay within the City. Not satisfied with tradi-
tional flood control techniques, basically concrete or
earthen channelization, and concerned with the likely
develo ment of the entire river volle feSU~ O~ ~~eton's Sau~ P/aae Park seeks ro mainrain identny amid enuaadilng dernlop-
p y o5 a menr (badcgraund).
the improvements, the City aggressively pursued -
whot was considered at the time to be visionary the In 1985 acquisition of land for the park and all
acquisition of flood prone property as public open -°channelization° improvements was completed. By
spoce in conjunction with flood prevention meosures. 1989, the mining operations ceased. And, the City of
L'rttleton and the South Suburban Parks and
A °Nerturat° Park is Dom - ~ Recreation District worked diligently to prepare a
. moster plan for the Park. As an oufigrowth of previous
The Littleton Plan, developed by the residents of studies and plans, the South Platte Park Master Plan
fhe City of Littleton in 1970, challenged the conven- wfls adopted by the South Suburban Parks and
~ tionol practices for flood management and directed Recreation District Board in Morch, 1983 and the
energy to developing a cooperative arrangement to - Littleton City Council in April, 1983.
acquire and monage flood prone property. Simply
put the plan served a dual purpose of providing ode- The master plon stressed four primary gools:
quate and safe, yet oesthetically appealing, flood
control and management policies and improve- ° Maintenance of the flood plain;
ments, and providing large tracts of public open ° Renovation and preservation of the resource
space along the South Platte River. Combining finan- (being the park);
cial contributions from the U.S. Corp of Engineers and ° Provision of environmental education
matching City funds from a.1971 bond election, and opportunities; and, working closely with private property and mineral- ° Provision of limited leisure opportun'rties.
righfs owners, a. public °nature park° was created in . ; the river valley, fo be preserved for the public for - The Park covering an area of approximately 625
years fo come. Physical features created from ncrtur= acres, paralleling the South P{ofte River for two miles,
. al occurrences and man-made intnusions combined . is composed of five lakes and ponds, extensive ripari-
to provide a unique opportunity to mold the 'park° . an and wildlife hobitat olong the river and open irri-
` into. a commun'rfy resource. The great flood of 1965 gation ditches, ond acres of flot prairie. Substontial
literally removed most acquisition obstacles along the stands of 100-year otd cottonwoods dot the area,
rnier, and mining activity, produced lond forms and and wildlife appears fo be fhriving. Throughout the
reclomation efforfs that would eventuolly compliment Park ond along the banks of the river and lakes, the
orid enhonce the choracter of the river volley. Continued on Dago 9...
.
6
MINING Corrtinued...
The new regulations also tightened the standards remote zone district that would significantiy restrict
for lot s¢e variances. Development must meet all the abilrty to build on mining claims and other remote
current county standards for access roads, driveways, parcels. The purpose ot the proposal is similar to
utilities and infrastructure and voriances can be Eagle County - to protect the environment and
denied 'rf the presence of steep or unstable slopes, unique alpine character of remote mountain areas.
highly erodible soils, geologic conditions or other Pitkin's proposal would limit uses to a backcountry
known natural hazards care present. An additional cabin of no more than 800 square feet. No outbuild-
provision allows denial if it is found that the variance ings, extension of utilities or snow plowing for access
process is being used to evade or circumvent the would be permitted.
coimtys zoning and subdivision review process. ~
Regulcrting the use of mining claims will continue
It is expected that the combination of inerger to be achallenge to planners in mountain communi-
requirements and stricter standards for lot size vari- ties. None of these approaches is a complete
ances will significantly reduce random development answer, however they represent the latest efi`orts to
on remote mining claims. Requiring access to meet address difficuft and, at times, perplexing issue.
county standards is probably the limiting factor since
very few remote areas have roads that eould meet For more information on the approaches presented
the standard. In areas where roads are up to stan- here contact Brian Peters, Summit Gounty Planning
dard, the county has seen some density reductions Department, 453-2561 x105; Sid Fox, Eagle Cvunty
through the merger requirements. Community Development Department, 328-8730; or
Ellen Sassaro, Pitkin County Planning Department,
Eagle and Pffkin Counties 920-5090.
In January, 1992 Eagle County adopted a back- TOWN OF VAIL TAKES A
country zoning district that is intended to preserve COMPREWENSIVE APPROACH
- and enhance remote backcountry areas. Uses by
right are limrted to agriculture Cprimo(ly gra¢ing), TO OPEN LAtVDS PROTECTION
open space, camping, hunting and ouffifiter/guide -
services. Speeial uses which require an environmen- by Russell Forrest, Envlronmental Planner
tal impact report include single family dwellings, Town ot vail, co
water impoundments and diversions, day camps,
small dude ranches, mineral extraction and forestry - Thirty years ago, few thought open space would
activities. The minimum lot area required is 35 acres be a rare commodity on the western slopes of
except for parcels, including mining claims, that exist- Colorado. In that time, development pressures have
ed prior to enactment of Eagte County's first subdivi- increased dramaticalty and made open lancis plan-
sion regulations in 1964. According to Sid Fox, Eagle ning a high priority for western slope commuriities.
County Planning Division Manager, no special use On March 1, 1994 the Town of Vail, Colorado adopt-
reviews have been requested since the backcountry ed a Comprehensive Open Lands Plan to preserve
zone was adopted. the open character of the Vail Valley. This plan wilf
create an open lands 'system' for the Town that will
Pitkin County has a merger requirement that has protect sensitive natural areas, improve trail connec-
been in place for several years. This requirement was tions, and provide additional open land for passive
recently challenged in the Colorcado Court of recreation. Worc on the plan began in June of 1993
Appeals. The basis of the appeal was that each indi- when an Open Lands Committee was formed. This
vidual mining claim is a legally subciivided property Committee consisted of representatives from the
recogn¢ed by the U.S. Govemment pursuant to the Town Council, Planning ond Environmentol
1872 mining law and that the county was precluded Commission, Vail Recreation District, Vail Associates
by Colorado's subdivision law from any requiring min- (ski company), U.S. Forest Senrice, Board of Reaftors,
ing claims to be merged. Pitkin County won the suit, and Town staff.
with the court finding that the county had clear
authority in state law to require mergers. The Open Lands Commfftee integrated a number
of projects Town staff was working on into the
According to Ellen Sassano, a planner with Pitkin Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. Several of these
County, an effort is now underway to develop a rural projects included improving trails, consolidating the
16
, . :
a
'°"a°,;
_ , - 7
-.°',.~.-r, ~ _ _ •~~~~_e~
~ i
~
:.\L.
~ . ~ '
LEGEND .me
~
~ .~.m..,
g .~.m.....~..~
~
6/ai%s Comprehenslve Open Lands Plan
Town's boundary by trading porcels with the Forest Tax (REi'i) thaf generates an average of $1.5 million
Service, open space zoning changes, and protecting a year.
sensitive natural areas. The Committee olso decided
to create a land resenre for affordable housing and Prior fo the passage of the Plan, 4he Town owned
pubiic services. By creating a land reserve, the Town 313 ocres of developed porks and 400 acres of land -
hoped to address two difficutt issues (protecting open zoned open spoce. There are fwo open space zone
space and identifying locations for crffordable hous- districts in the Town: Greenbel4 Natural Open Space
ing and public senrices) wffh one comprehensive (GNOS) and Agricuiturai Open Space (AOS). In con- - ;
inventory of remaining undeveloped parcels and junction with the Open Lands Plan the Town is propos- ?
open spoce. ing changes to these districts to create a natural area
~ac~ roun~ presenrafion district and a outdoor recreational dis-
9 trict. These zoning changes would remove inconsis-
tent permitted and conditionai uses from the GNOS
There has been dramafiic growth in Vail since and AOS districts. For example, schools ond single
being founded in 1962. Vail's permanen4 populafion family dwetlings are a conditional use in 4he
is approximately 5,300 with over 6,100 housing units. Agriculturol Open Space Districf and these uses
In the last 8 years, Vail hos gone from 65% buift.out in woutd be eliminated under the proposed changes.
1986 to 85% built out in 1993. The number of building
permits for new development has confinued to The Town Staff complefied an extenslve invenfory
increase with annual growth ranging from 5 to 10 per- of the Town's open space anci existing trails in the
cent. The Forest Service estimates thaf skier num- summer of 1943. In Juy of 1993 the Town acquired the
bers, which affect development, will grow by 296 senrices of Design VVorkshop in Denver fo assisP wifh
each yeor. This may increase ff Vail Associates pro- the development of the plan. Design Workshop was
ceeds with a 25% expansion of skier ferrain. chosen for it's experience in developing cost-effec- T
five methods for protecting open lands through con-
The Vail Town Council hos placed a priorify on servcrtion easements, land trusts, and other creative
identifying and acquiring additional open space negotiating techniques.
because of the rapid pace of development and the Planning Process
relatively limited number of open parcels. The gen- The planning process used in 4his project focused on
eral public has consistently said through surveys and three key questions (Figure l).
public forums fhat presenring open spoce is a major f:
priority. Since 1980, the Town has funded open 1) How much and wha4 kind of open space
space protection through a 1% Real Estate Transfer Corttlnued on Pego 98_
17
i
r
VA1L Continuod...
exists in Vail? conservation easements or acquisition. The trails plan
2) What additional open space does the wili interconnect existing and new parks and activity
community need? areas. The planned trails system will aiso provide a
3) How can the Town in a cost effective manner seamless trail experience between the Town,
meet community needs for open space? National Forest System, and Vail Associcltes ski moun-
tain. Trail heads are also intended to act as activity
lnventory of Open Space: The first step in the areas by providing passive recreational oppcartunrties,
process was identifying and mapping buildable (e.g. play areas, picnic areas, interpretive opportuni=
undeveloped parcels, zoned open space, Town ties). High priority actions to provide the framework
owned open space and parks, trails; and sensitive for this plan are shown in Figure 1. Actions for p6rcels
naturat areas. The Town engaged the sPNices of the may include conservation easements, trail ec,se-
Ncitional Heritage Program and a PhD student from ments, acquisition, and view easements. Since build-
Colorado State University to identify sensitive natural able lots in Vail range from $ 100,000 to $1 mitlion, the
habrtat, wetlands, and riparian areas. These areas number of outright acquisitions +s limited in the p1an.
were later given a high priority for protection.
Affer a concept wos developed and specific
Defiermining Needs: The second major step was °action' parcets were identified, the Town held a pub-
determining communrty needs for open space. Two lic forum at a Town Council meeting to explain the
public input sessions were scheduled in August and proposed plan and to receive feedback from the
September of 1993. These meetings were very well community and the Town Council. As in many plan-
attended with over 40 people attending each meet- ning projects, this one did have a hotly contested
ing. They were facilitated by Town Staff and the con- concept that involved completing the expanding the
suftants. The purpose and process for the plan were existing steam walk. The Town took a very up-front
explained at each meeting. Later, the large group approach to this issue and objectively listed both pros
was broken into small groups of 5 to 8 people which and cons and attematives of this ospect of the plan.
= was extremely productive. In these small groups, resi- Affer a close vote, the Town Council did choose to
dents identified where they lived and what type of remove the streamwalk from the plan because of
open space, outdoor recreation, and trails they want- _ concems expressed by residents with homes on the
- ed to see in both their neighborhoods and in the stream. The Council insteod decided to idenfiify
community as a whole. The groups listed open stream access areas. At the fourth and final public
space needs and then priorit¢ed those needs. The forum on the plan, the major actions of the plan were
~ priorities where: presented to the community and they were very
favorably received by over 40 residents that attend-
1) protect sensitive natural areas, ed the meeting.
~ 2) improve trail connections,
3) improve passive recreational opportunities. implementation
Providing for the Need: Affer canalyzing public The Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan will be
input and previous open land, recreational, and trail implemented over a 4 year period and be paid for
plans, an integrated approach was established as a over a 6 year period. The total cost of the plan is esti-
key concept for the plan. Crfferia where established mated at $4.5 million. The major funding source will
which reflected community needs and promoted a be the Town's Real Estate Transfer Tax. However, the
"systems' approach that integrates open space and Town will also seek funding from Go Colorado funds
trails planning to achieve the plan's priorities. Over and util¢e volunteers in trail construction to extend its
350 parcels were evaluated using these criteria and resources. Major next steps for implementing the plan
51 parcels of land were recommended for some type include the following:
of action. Each of these actions was given a high, .
medium and low priority based on their vatue to the 0 Contract for the senrices of a land negotiator.
open lands system. • Develop an Ordinance to designate
The Town was able to cost effectively meet multi- protected Town owned open lands. This
ple objectives by integrating open lands protection, designation will be independent of zoning
recreation, trails and creating a lands reserve for pub- and will require a vote of the people to
lic uses All sensitive natural areas are designated for change the use of 'designated operi space."
~a
~
-
:
4 Initicrte neighborhood planning input sessions and leaming to take odvontage of opportunity.
to identify opportunities fo ensure existing Because trails and greenwoys connect diverse and
parks and open space are meeting needs in incompatible land uses, they bridge the isolation of
individual neighborhoods. car-based pianning and archffectural monuments.
Yef, the difficufty of trail projecfs comes firom their
~~~~usian mosf aitractive feature: linearify. .
The approach taken in this plan will help moinfain the Why is there currently such a wide interest in
natural open character of the Vail Vailey, improve greenway and urban trail developmenf? These are
the use of existing parks through a interconnected the dynamics that ore driving this movement nation-
trail system, and protect sensitlve notural areas. wide:
Through close collaboration between Vaii Associates,
the U.S Forest Service, Vail Recreation Dis4ric4, Town Diversifgr og Trail Users
residents, and the local govemment multiple objec-
tives were achieved wffh an integrated approach to Just cas our urban parcs ore no longer fhe domain
environmental protection, recreational open space, of the parasol-carrying gentility, urban 4rails are lined
and trails. The Town is currently searching for o land with more people doing more things. VVe hove seen -
negotiator to cassist with the plan and has already the demographics of all outdoor activffies expond 40
begun to take action on the fop prioties in the plan. include more families,more middle-aged and elderly,
and more people wifh a variety of disabilities. As the
~~~EN THREADS BN THE URBAN FABRBC variefy of troil users has increased, so t,as the diversity
of octnrities on trails. On backcountry trails on new
by stuart H. Macdonaid use, the mountoin bicycte, is now more common in
many years than the trodi#ional hikers and equestri- ~
Many of our brightest ideas ons. Innovations like the use of Ilamos to carry sup-
tum out to be new discoveries of plies for backpackers are bringing still further °
old ones. Concepts like changes.
"greenbetts° and °emerald
strands° come from our On urban trails, o spiri~ of inventiveness character '
profession's eariy visionar- izes Rew activi#ies. One small piece of technology,
ies, but have foken on a fhe quiet, free-rolling plastic wheel, has produced -
new importance in the face of development pressure skoteboards, in-line skc7tes, and wheeled trail °skis.°
and recreation frends. Big bicycle-fype wheels bring children onto trails in
buggies pulled by a parent's bicycle and in °racing
We have all seen examples of the classic green- strollers° pushed by a jogging adult.
way-restaurant tables along the Son An4onio River
Vl/alk, pastoral landscapes of the Hudson Rnrer Variations on the moun4ain bike are also bringing '
Greenway, and the muttiple trails of the American more people out on the greenways. fie bicycle ~
River Greenway in Sacramento. Buf these corridors boom of the 1960s and 70s was based on the now- Y'
are ar from a decorative touch fo our city centers. familiar ten-speed. Designed for racers and long-dis-
The need to revital¢e city cenfers hos brought an tance touring, these bikes were ill-suited to the orer-
interest in riverfront, open space, and natural orea oge person and most of the millions sold became
presenvation; a national commitment fo fltness has garage clutter. The new bikes may never see dirf,
increased the number of people ouf on trails; and much less a mountain, but their upright handlebars,
new concepts in mobility are bringing greenwoys into handy brake levers, and sturdy 4ires make 4hem fhe
the mainstream of transportotion. vehicle of choice for frail riding.
Our current concepfi•of °greenways° is o vision Two opposite responses have greeted these new
beyond the parks, plants, and visual aspects of the users. The negative reaction sees user conflict and '
past; now, greenwcrys encompass tronsportc7tion, seeks to bon everyone but pedestrians. Positive
urban wildlife, filood confrol, utilities, education, approaches fo multiple use are to build more trails, fo
neighborhood planning, and ofher threads of the design fhem with realistic width, gradient, and sighf-
urban fabric. Creating new greenways means under- lines, and fo include both paved and unpaved trails
standing the dynamics of many types of corridors, C,r,,,,,,ed o„ P,90 20...
19
VIIORK SESSION FOLL0IN-UP
TOPEC QUESTIONS FOLfl.0W-UP SOLflDT90NS
1993 10/19 SNOUV STORAGE LAND LARRY/BOB McL: Immediately pursue purchase from VA Initial discussion between TOV and VA re: possible future lantl exchanges
PURCHASE of current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres have occurred.
adjacent to the west.
1994
02/08 MANOR VAIL SIDEINALK BOB NicULARRY: Investigate blintl corner. Bob McL has viewed area of concern. Right-of-ways will be identified to
(request: Johnston) see if there is room within the right-of-ways for a sidewalk.
02115 CHUCK ANDERSON YOUTH PANUMERV: Contact VRD about moving up the selection Packet received and included in Paul's and Jan's materials, 513l94,
AINARD ( process to allow awards to be given during May PRIOR to
(request: Strauch) gratluation or to be included with the graduation
ceremonies. J
03108 UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES LARRY: Create a Master Plan to phase the undergrounding Larry has memo in process.
MASTER PLAN of all above-ground utilities vuithin Vail.
(request: Council)
03108 NIGHT LIGHTINGINIGHT TOUR LARRY: It would appear our night lighting in the Will schedule for an Evening Meeting as soon as agendas will allow.
(request: Strauch) CrossroadslVTRCICovered Bridge area could use some TOV, in the past, budgeted $30,000 for adding lights to bus stops, street
enhancement. What is the street lighting program currently intersections, and bridges for safety. Starting in 1994, the butlgeted
geared toward? amount was increased to $50,000 to address both safety concerns and
those areas adtlressed in the Village Streetscape Plan.
COUNCIUSTAFF: In the near future, we will try to
schedule an evening "tour" to look at the ambience created Re; Christmas lighting at VTRC: Lighting addition depends on a
and safety issues inherent in our "core" community. prioritization of funding. This could be a part of the night tour?
3/22 BEARS/GARBAGE RUSSELUPAUL: The issue of bears attacking unsecured Issue will be addressed at 6/7/94 Work Session.
(request: Johnston) food has still not been resolved. What proactive stance can
we take to keep this dangerous situation from occurring?
04/05 SIGNS LARRY/GREG: Why are there so many signs in this town? Tom, Ken, Buck, and Larry met Tuesday, 5113194. They will return with a
They represent neither a quality appearance nor are they proposed signing plan by the end of July,1994.
"user-friendly." There are 24 signs between Tom
Steinberg's house and the TOV... ,
P June 3, 1994 Page 1 of 2
04/05 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS BOB McL: Coordinate with Jack Lewis. Bob McL met uvith Jack and is trying to se4 something up.
05110 SUN VAIL T-111 T-111 was not put on Sun Vail. (request: Navas)
`
June 3,1994 Page 2 of 2