HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-21 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TODUN COMLIL @iVORIC SESSIOR9
uUESDAYy IrEBRUATn T( 21, B99J
1:15 P.M. iN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Site Visit - Lions Square Lodge.
2. Planning & Environmental Commission Interviews.
3. Art In Public Places Intervieuvs.
4. Housing Authority Interviews.
5. Ovenriew of Eagle River Nlanagement Plan.
6. Discussion of Lease Policy and Tent Sale Regulations.
7. Revision of Town of Vail Fireplace Regulations.
8. DRB Report.
9. Informatian Update.
10. Council Reports.
11. Other.
12. Executive Session - Land Negotiations.
13. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOBAING wAEET'ING STAF37 71nAES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIIIAATE APtD SUBdECT TO CIiANGE)
• * • • • • •
7HE NECT NAIL TODUN COUNCIL REGULAFi VIIORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2l28195, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. !N TOV COUIVCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOIAIING VAIL TOWN COUIVCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WOLL BE OId TUESDAY, 3/7l95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBEFiS.
THE P9E3CT bAIL TOVVN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETIIVG
liV9LL BE ORI TUESDAY, 3/7/95, BEGIPlPdING AT 7:30 P.M. Ifd TOV COUNCIL CHAAABERS.
• • • • • • •
C:UIGENDA. WSE
I a
C
1VAIL TOUVN COUIVCIL
. WORK SESSION
114.UESDAIIy FEB1-8V/9RH 61y 1995
1:95 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
1:15 P.M. i. Visi4 the site of the proposed Lions Square Lodge building addition, and
Jim Curnutte parlcing and common area variances (660 Lionshead Place), in preparation
for the Tovvn Council's evening discussion of their appeal of the PEC
approvaf. [MEET AT TOV MUiVICIPAL BUILDING]
2:00 P.M. 2. Planning & Environmental Commission Intervievvs.
Mike Mollica
ACTIOfV REQUESTED OF COUIVCIL: Review the attached four letters of
interest and interview the applican4s for the three open positions on the
PEC.
BACKGROUND RATION,4LE: There are three open positions on the
seven member PEC. All three openings are for iwo-year terms.
The terms of Bill Anderson,'Kathy Langenwalter and Allison Lassoe are
due to expire at the end of February, 1995. The newly appointed members
will join Greg Amsden, Bob Armour, Jeff Bowen and Dalton Williams,
vvhose terms will expire at the end of February, 1996.
The following citizens have applied for appointmen4s on the PEC: O(evin
Deighan, Allison Lassoe, Greg Mof#et, and Henry Pratt.
2:30 P.M. 3. Art In Public Places Interviews.
George Ruther
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review 4he letters of interest
submitted February 7, 1995 and interview the applicants for the fiive
openings on the AIPP Board.
BACKGROUND RATIOiVALE: There are five at-large member openings
on the P?IPP Board. Additionally, due to Kathy Langenwalter's resignation
from the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC), a new PEC
representative to the AIPP Board will need 4o be selected. The 4erms of
Jim Cotter, Lolita Higbe, Laura Nash, Ken Robins and Karen Smith are due
to expire at the end of February, 1995. The newly appointed members will
join the Design Review Board member representative, Alice Cartwrigh4,
IVancy Rondeau, Tom Steinberg (Town Council representative) and the
new PEC representative on the AIPP Board.
The following citizens have applied for appointments on the AIPP Board: Jim Cotter, Lolita Higbe, Kathy Langenwalter, Marianne McTighe, Ken
Robbins, and Karen Smith. `-V Yto
2:45 P.IVi. 4. Housing Authority Interviews.
Andy Knudtsen .
MCT;O1~ nEeuESi cu OF CGuNCiL: ~teview tne at4ached two letters of
interest and interview the applicants for the one position open on 4he
Housing ,4u4hority.
BACKGROUiVD RATIONALE: There are one open position on the five
member Housing Authority. The following citizens have applied for the
appointment on the Housing Authority: Dick Cleveland and Kyle UVebb.
1
I
3:00 P.M. 5. Overview of Eagle River Management !Plan.
Russell Forrest
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: ~Review and comment on the Eagle
River Management Plan.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The fundamental purpose of the Eagle
River Management Plan is to develop a common philosophy for managing
and protecting this critical resource in our region. Participants in this plan
include recreational interest groups, developers, water districts, Federal,
State, County, and local agencies. Eaclh agency is currently reviewing the
plan to determine if a memorandum of understanding could be signed
committing each participating agency to implement the plan, as ractical
and feasible. It is recognized that each jurisdiction has its' own system and
will implement the plan in different ways. The purpose of this work session
is to highlight the key components of the plan that may be applicablE; to
Vail.
3:45 P.M. 6. Discussion of Lease Policy and Tent Sale Regulations.
Tom Moorhead
Larry Grafel ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide staff direction on action to
Mike Rose be taken regarding use of public property, definition of special events s3nd
lease policy regarding public property.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This item for discussion is a follow up on
several items including deck leases, Iiaase of public space in VTC and
limitations on tent sales/special events.
4:15 P.M. 7. Revision of Town of Vail Fireplace Regulations. The PEC has stated same
Russell Forrest concern with the installation of a new tE:chnology solid fuel burning device
Paul Reeves within the Town limits. The solid fuiel burning unit is EPA phase II
approved, but has the ability to be useci in a fashion that may put the unit
out of compliance with EPA phase II mquirements.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Requesting direction on whether
the Air Quality/Fireplace Ordinance should be modified.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Attached is a memo presented to the PEC
on January 23, 1995. The memo addresses the installation of masanry
fireplaces in the Town of Vail. These uinits are installed similar to an open
hearth fireplace, but are further designed to compty with the EPA phase II
requirements. These units are very efficient if burned as designated. 'fhe
particular matter emissions from the unit when burned as designed are
approximately one half of the phase II rnaximum limit. The concern is khat
the unit could be burned with the cioors open, and possibly violate
emissions. The EPA tests these units, only as designed, with the doors
closed.
On January 23, 1995, staff discussed the issue with the PEC. The PEC
agreed that it would not be appropriatE: to single out masonry fireplac;es.
However, they did ask Town staff to look into modifying the ordinance so
that the Town would have the final abillity to exclude units if it were lilcely
that the unit could be operated in a fashion other than the. manufacturers
recommendations.
The opinion of the manufacturers, rE:tailers, and some environmental
professionals IS that .th?. units are uf!;3tt:'aC±iVB `Pl~th, ;c .'~.~t`i^vis vjren iGi
people to be inclined to burn in this mode (see attached letter).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend the ordinance not
be changed at this time, but the installation of these units will be monitored,
and if there appears to be degrading air quality, due to these installaticros,
then we would reconsider modifying the ordinance.
2
r.
4:45 P.M. 8. DRB Report.
Randy S4ouder
George Ru4her
5:00 P.M. 9. Information Update.
5:10 P.M. 10. Council Reports.
5:20 P.M. 11. Other.
5:30 P.M. 12. Executive Session - Land Negotiations.
6:00 P.M. 13. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOnAIF1G AAEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARc APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TC CHANGE)
0 0 0 0 * * 0
THE NEXT NAIL T01MN COUNCIL REGULAR 1AlORK SESSIORf
!A/ILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2/28/95, BEGIPVPIIiVG AT 2:00 P.M. IIV TOV COUNCIL C'riAPJi6ERS.
Ti-OE FOLLOlAl1NCa VAIL TOliUN! COUIVC9L FtEC'aULAR ifl/ORK SESSION
NlIILL BE Old TIJESDR,Y, 3R/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. !iV TON COUNCIL CHANBBERS.
T'HE VYEXY NAIL T01dVN COUIdCIL FiEGULAR EVENING IUIEETING
lNILL BE Oid TUESDAv, 3/7/95, BEGINFIING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CEiAAlIE:ERS.
• ~ • • • • ~
C:WGENDA.WSE
3
, ~ ~j~ IID~ILGI
A~i~ D~~ecbr -
~rn mu~ ~ ~e~~~
T~ ~ Va,1 = . -
~ taould a e~~, -
~ ~o-~ ~
aYI Y-nV,*(an
~
~IL 6-K
~
~LLlso~l
~
~
lFebeuaty 13,1995
- FEg y 4 1995 Vail Town Court6il
Town of Vail Community Development I)epartQneng
'I~ Jx~ ~ ~i ,I
! 5 SO1S4Q4 ]FSOY1$agC R0ad
Vally QiOlOgadfl
TO Wh0Lg1 I$ May COY]CeYTI:
Please accept this correspondence as my Letter of. $nterest for the vacancy in the Planning
and Enviromnental; Commission. My farrlily has reCentfy located to Vail from Denver and
I am inteees4ed in bccoming anore involved vvith the Community. I am a commercial real
estate c.onstaltant specializing in neighborhood shopping ccnters and have been involved
vvath development and constnaction for over 16 years.
As a recent home ovdner in the area, I am dery concerned vvith the tremendous growYh ra2e
throughout the VO Valley. I would like to be indolved in the fisture of oue Regaon as it
vvill affect the quality of living for ourselves and ouc famrnilies•
ificant entitlemenY and zoning experience ar?d feel Yny experience wil? lend 'atseIf
I hade sigm
ta ghi§ po§ftion. I arn noe developing anything in Colorado and do not feel rny backgroun
would cause any potential conflicY. I can be reachod a4 (303) 476-3436 should yau have
ques4ions or concerns regarding my background. in addition, I have attached a c.opy of
rny resume and a list of refe: ences which should provide you with additicnal inf'ormation
regard'ang my bactcground..
'g'hanlc you in advance for your consideration. Sinc,erely,
,
4~ein Deighan""%t
riu....o.,.,~ ~ e
~
KE\'1N P. llE1G114M1
2992 (E) Bcllflowcr
t'aii, CO
(303) 476-3436
experience
1994 nHT C',ROiiP, L.L.C. nenver, ('O
E.zecistive Jlice Presiderat
Hirzd to manage and eperate developme;nt and construction divisions fer
coimnercial development cornpany. Mana.ged development and constructior,
departmenl for %vork un rre (5) shopping c:enlers lolaling an cslimalCCi $16
million of constructior activity ir, 1}'ear. Responsible for all prc?jeet hudgets,
payment applications, negotiation of cont*acts, and supen-ision of all consultants
and general contractors. Handled due diligence and entitlements fer four (4)
shopping ccntcrs throughout thc Colorado rcgion. Analyzcd potcntiaX
CleVeIOpI[1cIlt L1aI15dGt1UI1s 2IlCi iiL'(,U1s1t1QI1S.
1991-1994 'I'HE kULL C'U~11YAN1' L-is Angeles, C:A
I"ICE PYESILIE71t, Southern Calirvrnia Region
IIired bti• Division President. and given sole responsibilit}• to start up Commercia:,
Develupmenl Crroup for lhe Lus An.geles Divxsion. Promuled to `'ict Presidenl of
Retail T)eveloprnent cn manage new bixsiness origination, due diligence,
development, acquisition, entitlement, ten.ant representation and leasing of
commercial projects throughout Californ:ia, - NTevada and Denver region`.
Evaluatcd individual propcrtics for potential dc-i-clopmcnt or acquisition.
Negotiated purctiase optioiis for projects i.'ollowitig ici-deptli arialysis of site,
construction costs, residual values, tenant interest and financing probability.
Prepared all construction and equity financing requests.
Esperience included the entitlement, marke:tina and development of a 15 acre
redevelopnient project for -kmerican Stores; entitlement. and disposition of a 70
acre miZed-use projezt, includina 2 land. sales totaling 45 acres; business
origination of joint venttse agreement and development agreement fo:r
de`-elopment of the Camarillo Factory Stores. Spezitic accomplishments
included:
..-kwarclel exclusive represenlalion agreemcnl wilh Am;,riQan
Store; fnr• sit.e selection throughout the South Ray and T,ang
13ea-ch rzgians.
. Hircd by Sun Amcrica ta rcdc\rclop and lcasc a 400,000
. squarc foot promotioiial cettter wtiicli iricluded SIIIILYLS.
Linens and Things, Good Guys, Tower, ANIC, Cost Plus,
Marshalls and koss. Pruject is 99% occupied and has met or
exceeded the project pro-forma.
. Res,-arched dlld pICpdied Illghest and Uest use analysis of
larg-. residential and commercial land parcels on behalf of
national financial institutions.
F~~rn: Kevm
~y C O~P a~ .
Mt4EL CR(~ t Park Placc~ Der•elopmerzt llv 4''°°°SSCd a ce foot tni%ea-
,ucccssfu place
TRA prir~cipa., ~11GZ1 ' ~.S IIU1~lOIl ~ u~S. Pa1~+ the
~ of pro~cct tcam e a S600.milliolG 4retail in
1 9 8 y-lyy~ ~~arl~cting c h a r g' p l a c, h~te~ ~~h a d u n~er~.
g;,~on d i n ar k: . re~i acn tia l, any o~ a e~,4 m i l l i o n,
lication of P p~'lce, LroN"' Comva sale
peieuii APP wh~ch included ~1 Trammell ~nt an
use pr°Ject est developmo ate~ ~n ~?e zntitlem~
Was the larg ,~~tively pa~'cip
States. of the Site• s.~~`~"tion
United T~~aential portion , est lease tr~n~ .
32 acre ercDivisioil ~~~.5 larg , c.. ~vh~ch
r,ire, ~r»1m ell ~ro: comP~ .vith DennyS v' and
resenta Traxnm foat le~se e~~.,s head4uarters il
rtin8 ~ep losecl er D ~f ° and reta
111a ne~otiated ~ square o f
l 6.~ 8ie f orm ice d, ~56 m~llion. dy~ent 25o,0p0 squa re fCesentati~~S that
198I-1989 ~olnun 1988, a tt~rzz t~etinQ eet o R~ Cesulted
a'quisition an~ lo,; ~e~o Ma
ii1latel}' wh~ch
~;~cluded the Leased a1~P One af marketing strategY
~tY• give project.
adJa~ent proP'first 18 inot?ths• ~omPreh~re foot cniYed-use
SpaCe ~n ~ ai~d iml~lexnez1ted a liam,l~'II
fp~11~2L~ of a 1.S m~llion Sg~ girmin-
an~y z rescoration
in a 99°;o flccup NCIir~~2 and hom
t~F BIR-MIresideritia'_ Painai g ozk on 2~ ~'tojects.
TI~E PAINT C~- ercial and
t~G p~xnzT'O~erato: of cc~mm nn~ bailt hus~nes5 to ai?r?
19'15-19 ~n}'. Furnjecl cor1Pan)
~ZI
comP• Detroit, -
OF LA~ti; ~4ichi~an
5CHO0L the Statz P'ar ofDistrict Cou~
D~TgpIT ~ N,dmltted to 5tates and
e~uc~tion 0~ ~u~~st,198 ~ th, Unite~ CoUn"eling
L1i\I~ ERSIT, *ticipate ~linic wojking full
Iuris D~ctc3rate ln to C~a• Ur1~an I-"M, ~N11i1e
a,vvardz~ Selected by iaculty ated in th`' oree in 3 year
in s
1986 19g'I. pa~ticip .u De~,
ship Pro~am~an~e d I-a .
I,-~tern v L11~1~~11t c1ie~lts. udge• goulder+ CC'
S~ll~lll~, ,,lerk for a probate I
tept~ maj~r in Political
time as ~ Ser.~or with a iaro,
c sp~aking
~ OF CnLOR- D~e O ee 1~ May~ 19 ` ylt.ei~vsrip prog'
,~gSIT LJnited States Senate zn~ies, Publi
t~`~ ~
lBacheor of and federal ag ~vithstuc~ies.
1992 n,S~~I~arded F a- ult.v apl~ oisltn~ent to ~on- stituents G~o~~,,urent.
CambzidJe.,
zf,ce. betti~een
edliais~n~'ork biUs. `arork e6 d ~1>>. ~t timF ~~a
nue1 ~.oilege, 1
lnclu , le isl~titie ~sonE~an •
an~ SCSZ1TL'~1 0, program les~.
Estate Sa
~ternational La ' ~.An1ent of R ~ot~n~il of 5hopFing
~,omPleted ~ed C.alifornia DeP xnational of Inte dn~} Foundation.
P'ss
stud5 an
additional t~ni~ersit}'. ~`ienber r;ational
B al ef N1ichigan C alif ornla
ef State ~t southern eless C.oxn~rittee.
~lemher ent for Hoi" eXpense'.
Past Ftesid Qundat~~n law schaol
C enter~ sa1i~ F e and ~n~mis
at~~liations of Ch~i: ' or.f collzb .
~4emreT paid 1G0 " e of PiOJzct y
,
ne children. o~vledg
d al~est of ~ ncluding ~vorking ,
~ ompl}ter l:texrte,
person~, bACI:ground
M
1
From.
f•
Project Re?ated Experience
• 1,oVF1,Ai~`f?, 0
, t project. «'erl:
Siit7PPTNC:F.[vTF~y4 a based reaevelopmzn truction oi
ecEm > bertson.
~'ork and the
~er
F.STj,aKF, FT.,,~7A ~,rEteel D
~300 square foot .~l off-site \
Cofi,truction Cam; ~ t a
Ire;,t a~ency, on- and
Srurus: and construction oredevel~~p
,
Man~ged d evelolment o tenants CO
E~
otiations ~vith existin~ NOR~,I~UL
included nzgSDdcG.
18,~00 sy`~are fec~ of shop ~TE ~ t eltsolis
CE"r nri1 1ete:~. 71,000 squa1e foot ~
`TE SHQPPI`C
`VASHI~GTV'~ POI_ c~E v~ ork C p Stz sitE; woik for 1 1995.
ad • PkaS Z ~ G~~ence Januar~,
Status: .:Ibertso!1s Building aflc~ Pr•oiect ~i~ TOI~, CQ
ment and consu~ ction of all on-site ? build~l.i~ ongs- L t0 THOR
?vlanaged devzlopacent shop space and P
based cenLer. Plannzd adj
OPPING CENTER . letail proje=t. Seven (7) Pad
lete
Sita tii'ork Comp
COLdR'~O PL'1ZA SH ~ite vc'~Jlk fOI' ZO dl,..
; Proiect 1995-
Off St.atus: Ph~.se 1 P4~i ~it lallC~ ~irilStllAGt10?1 Ct duled to commence inFeUtua1S'- pi;N.,~~, CO
de~ ele~n ,ho sPac~' ` 3EFFERSON C
= p
;~ianag' leced and phase Il ?~lb
sales ~Qmp ~TER
SHOPPING CE,'~. OpQ syuaic fool. er~sons ~a~
PINE~ ~'REEIk. Fhase II Ufi~er Carist;uc±1~~~ Gments lor 120:ha~e of the pr~Ject.
, P)~.;se 1Com~Ieteci, anJ l~nanl imp~ ~eC,~nd P
,~tatc.s. s a~e builaings ' 6.()n0 ~q~re foot AL;ROR~?, CO
1~-ianagc1l =Orc:Pl-tiun of shuP P~ ~
in~? center. Plann ~Hed and curi•entlv develoPing'
sS»pp unity shopPing
pPPINC CENTER aet hased> c~mm
T L~,~~ pL~,ZA ~ ~-~rtstruc~tior~ , uare foot, Tarb
~'~'l, , ,leted, Phase 11 Uju.c~ nf 5;~?00 s~
-,e: Corr~t mznt and construction - FORT
"tarc:s: ~ ~.`•lannu?g, dzvelop COLLINS,
-vi ~-Q
anagGd P
cent~r. G ~ ~NTER ~~~mp~eted site
NE,RS S~UPpi~,v , U ul rerileY
comm unity c~nter.
L' 5{or 195,000 square
C'L ' based
tso~s
sI Nlav 19
. .~idbertsuns' ~~eC~, Erentslitlfeor ~~:~i1ts Lnd~rw
C.OUti'~'h~ ~ B Su1e COR C_~mpl nti acr:.-, r'.lbet
lt~ _ a ~
~ning ~nd e~lem rtsnns. C.onstil.~ction scheduled tn
1~~Ianaging ~he plaznc: for
ort and all due dilig LOS ANGELES, CA
evatuatian rep
foot center. INt:. Stores and 5av6n) to
S PRQPERTIES, Stores
A,~~RIt.~rr STURE erican ~eles areas. ]-'~red to identi£~'
uietttnr~ penr~ing a,~ieement with olitan Los
resen.atiar . ~,letrop
r'ou~n and neg~ ~each ar~~ ~c cntitlcm~nt ot thc sitcs within thls
Statu.,s: T,and Leng
„~iated ~:xclus"v Sou B a~ l. ~ decumants, and mana~
en` sit~s i~ the urcha..
locate de~e~"ac~cloptn~n? 'ixcs' ncg°tiatu p
L,A JULLA, LA
and anal}Zc hic region.
;pecific gcOgya~ 'V I ~:i~ an`-, a
SHUp
Y1Nis L~~ t with 5olus Pra~~ert}' Compcyw~r
JC)1.L~• X` 1LL~•GE SC?l df,veloptftent Pro lec ol 418.00() syuare foc~l P
t Competed Fall IlI4 ~ p0`~ fee ana emVnl inemas, ~'tarshalis,
Constrxcc ion an apPro~ il"ate O, ANdC'.
Status: v an~ cons~ruc:~ion m lslands, and
cecuring 5m't~' ecords, Lost Ylus,
Assisted ~CTLG:S. CUTIITAGL lriG1UCiCS ~C~S1II„ •lower K 000 square 100t.
elivision of Sun • former re?iorial mall ~i11 ~,S~Su~ r C'xo~ •n, and leasfor 11~~
. 'Tris renovat'on °f 3 onsibies
Indi includza maxketing
centerKoss, 'irader Joes, Jenriter ~'onvertibles, Line
ia Pizza kltchen. vidual resp
Californ roJcct.
Szcond phasc of thc p
rrcm: r.evu) yZJ~..a.. oan.,u~r.c, ~ - . _
9
k
AMLlt1CAN S'1'U1ZE5 L'UNfTM1:1tC.LAL 1th:tUY;ti'Ei,OY~I*EN'1' Y12C).1EC"1' BUE1A 1'AItK, C'A
Slattts: Under Cons*ructivr, .
IIired as fee develeper by ?utterican Steres to ~e-develop and leasc a 15 acre coirunercial project. Project tenants
include Lucky Slures, Savin Drugs, and Pic•,N-Sav. Negolialed mulli-parly Disposition and Dtvelupxnenl
Agreement; tiTemorandum ni'IJnderstandina and De:,•iaration of RestricLive C'nvenants and Ccrnditions enabling
the proJect to be deveioped. V
Nc;otiat:.d and proccssca Conditional Uso 1'cnnit and Environmcntal vnpaot Rcport, managcd arclut:cturat and
eiigiiiccring drawings. astestes aUateme?u, demol1L10i1 BIICi GOI15t1'UCt10I1 Of 1'etJll. CeI1Ler.
liEL-M.Akt'1'Uw'N C'ENl'L12 SHUI'YIiVU C'EN'1'Y;K llJEVVElZ; CU
'Ztatus: Comvleted Er:Pitlenaents, Major Tc^,14cZ14I LEcIS'ES, DEffc?tedBy Citizen Referendu»i
Completed all entit?ements for development of a 450.000 square foa*_ power center. Completed graund leases
wilh Targcl. Mervyns, linited .Arlisls. Chevy's RCStauriaL and Grissanli's Reslauram. ResrwnsibililiUs includc;d ,
implementation of marketing program, and negotiatiom of an:,hor tenant leases.
IhOLL LEONARD CAM.:4RILL0 CENTER CAMARILLO, CA
Status: Plzusel Cvnsnzcctivr Sclrecluleca fcr ~ornpletio~, Jartuury, 1995
Negotiated and structured a joint venture agirtemen: with Chelsea!Gi'A REIT to purchase and develop a 35 acre,
300,000 square foot Factory Stores project.
Requested by joint venture parlnership io reposition and rezone 70 acre indu:trial pi•oject. Project was in
foreclosure at coirunence_nent of assi.grunent. Completed successful re-zoning of the property to a coimnercial
designaliun. Furmulaled an.a implemenlcd relail land sales prograin to pravide incorrie pruducing aclivily on lhe
site whil-. satisfyina rzstrictions impiemented hy financial inst.itutiom. Found, ne(rotiated and closed an t 1 acre
land sale to Edward's C'inema
PACIP`IC St1NSET MIXLD-USE PRO.JECT . LOS ANGELCS, CA
Status: Pr.n)ect Sold to Tiztrd Parh• Int~estor
Foiuld and negotiated asset management and leasing contract to work oirt iuifinished mi?.ed-use project in Pacific
Palisadzs. Obtained Car.ditional lise Permit and Certificate ofUccupancy tor 105,000 square toot project. This
project was previousl}' never occupied and sitting vacant far over 4 years. Managed construction completion and
rezoning of the project. Created and managed marketing program which resulted in securing leases for
approximatcly SU% uI'the reiail projCCl wiQun onc year. Projzct leasing Cnabled Hcller Financial le> dispose of
the center to a third party investor.
FIRST LA BANK CUNSULTIVC CONTRACT CALAB,XSSAS, C'A
Stutu,s: Cornr?letecl Consulting Corttract, A &:zltinX,-ippro-xl of Fntitlerrtertt Contract
Hired by First Los Angeles BanJ: to prepare a"High-.st and Best tise Study" for 220 acre commercial and
residential project. t_.onstilting work inclu.zed anaNsis of existing entitlements, enviro~mnenta.lly sensitive
wetlands areas. propased land uses, current residential niarkets, and opposing special interest groups. The
consulting repori included marlceting analysis for proposed retail center, nr.. entitlement strategy, land planning
study and a disposition strategy.
From:iCewnue,gn;,r,
r
KEb'1N Y. llE1CrHAN
Prufcssional Rcfcrcnccs
1. David Mudgett
Prasident
The Iioll Company Retaii Division
(714) 833-3030
2. rrederick Stephens
President
Kcmpcr Rcal Estatc Managcmz;nt
(510) 283-8280
C.hristoph~r Huss
Director of Real Estate, Western Region
,A,merican Stores (Lucky Foods and Savon T_)rugs) -
(714) 739-6313
4, Jefferv Dritley
Pv~sident
Kcamey Street Real Estate Company'moraan Stanle,y
(33110) 203-9600
5. M; Thomas M,;nonougr,
Yrincipal
Trammell Crow Company
(714) 553-1220
6. Nti'illiaiTi Gannon
Principal
OPM 11anaDement
(303) 320-5300
7.;Tonathan Genton
Vice Ptesident.
Helios Partners, L.P.
(312)920-2471
, -
1
• -
. a _
Schultz
006 _ .
Tel: 03) 476-1147
Fax: (30
February 2, 1995
Henry Pratt
3827-B Lupine Drive Vail, CO 81657
Re: PEC
_ Dear Councilmembers,
h have lived in the Town of Vail for the past 15 years, have a business in the Town and
would like to be considered for a position on the PEC. This application is being submitted
a day past the published deadline but this is a result of work pressures and not my normal
method of operation. My desire to serve on this board is the result of my concerns as a
citizen and is not related to my occupation as an Architect.
Sincerely,
GWAT~'MEX/PRAYT/S HUL.TZ ARCNl7ECTS. P.C.
Henry R. Pratt, AIA
HRP
P
. -
s aft,
Schult
Architec'tsi p.cl
IOiO -
_ 03)476
a _ (30
HENRY R. PRATT, AIA
ACADEMIC: Bachelor of Arts
Princeton University, 1977
Master of Architecture .
University of Virginia, 1979 .
REGISTRATIONS: National Council of Architectural Boards,
Colorado .
AFFILIATIONS: American Institute of ArchitESCts
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Gwathmey/Pratt/Schultz Arc:hitects, P.C.
Present
Henry Pratt Architects, Vail, Colorado
1988-1989
Gordon Pierce Architect, Vail, Colorado
1986-1987
SMS Architects, New Canaan, Connecticut
1985
Briner/Scott Architects, Vail„ Colorado
1980-1984
PROJECT EXPERIENCE: Liftside in Vail for MECM En-terprises, 27 condominiums
with underground parking and amenities. In progress..
Streamside at Vail Evergreeri Building for Marriott
Ownership Resorts, 39 units with parking and amenities,
90,000 SF completed 1991,
Gateway Plaza, Vail, Coloraclo, Project Manager for
60,000 SF mixed use facility, completed 1991.
Bishop Park, Vail, Colorado, 11 luxury condominiums/
townhouses with underground parking and amenities,
project architect with GPA, completed 1988.
Simba Run Condominiums, \/ail, Colorado, project manager
for Briner/Scott, completed '1983.
LOCAL SERVICE: Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums Board of Directors
Vail Lacrosse Club: Founder
p ; - . . . . . , . .
~ : : . . . . , .
~31y5
GREG MoFFET - 1753 SHASTA PLACE
. !/AIL, CO 81657'.. . , .
. : .
. . _ _ , . . _
: .
, . .
- . ; ' . , .
. . . ,
. . , _ _ . . Pam Brandmeyer
: . .
, . . . .
Assistant Town Manager - . . . . . ° ; _75 S. Fronfage Road
.
. . . , . - . , . _
. .
' !/ail,.. CO 81657 .
. . ; January 31, 1995
. . Dear Pam, : As we discussed, I am interested in serving on either the Planning Committee or
the Design Review Board. 1n either case my interest stems from my desire to
_ get involved in my community in areas where I can make a significant
contribution. Both fhese commiftees afford an opportunity to play a parf in
_ charting Vsil's future.
As a new full fime resident (and former weekender) with a fiamily, my interest is
_ focused on preserving and enhancing an environment that welcomes full and.
~ part time residents,families and visitors.
As for qualifications, I enclose a copy of my application fior the Vail Valley
- Niarketing Board. In addifion to the background described in that letter, let me
- emphasize a few points. ~
: During my ten years in fhe commercial real estate business I oversaw the design
. and construction of over two million square feef of construction. ! also .
developed and executed project renovations, which included exterior and inferior
: aspects, which exceeded $10 million. In mosf cases these projects involved the .
. incorporation of "public space" and I had to deal with the aesthetic as well as . -.#unctional components of the designs submitted. Additionally, I have experience
with ADA retrofits, Hazardous materials abatement and the other issues that
. : tend to impact projecf design. . .
. . , _ . . s
. . . . _ - i .
_ I am nof an architect:or des'igner;: but_ my ezperience broughf ine into almost ' - ~ daily contact with these professionals as well as engineers and contractors. I:,:: have participafed in.mastec plan development as well as ttie hiring; supervision; : -
and approval of design/construction teams: Some, of the projects" in which . I was inVolved include Prudential Plaza (offce _and. retail) ; City Center . and .First ; . • _ ; . : _ Interstate Tower Nortfi in downtown Denver,The Commons in Greenwood Village (including extensive site,changes) and Norhtgate Mall in.,Cinncinati ($100. ' -
million renavation)
_ . _ .
, .
. . ; -
. - . . . - . - - _
I believe my background issalient to both boards:. Please let me know if you
need any further information.
: -
. _ - .
. . Sincerely; . : . - : Greg Moffet = - . . _ , . , . . _
y - _
~
0
' GREG MOFFEu
1753 StiASTA PB..ACE
vAeL, co 81657
Pam Brandmeyer .
Assistant Town tVlanager
75 S. Frontage Road !lail, CO 81657
December 27, 1994 Dear Pam,
I am interested in'serving on the Vail Vailey Marketing Board. Although I am not
certain whaf constitutes a"letter of qualification°, perhaps a rundown of my
current and former positions and responsibilities will fit the bill.
I am currently Presidenf and co-owner of TIGA Advertising Inc. Our company
has the addertising contract for the Town of 1lail buses as well as AvoNBeaver
Creek Transit, Breckenridge and VI(inter Park bus systems, and the Vail and
Gunnison airports. Additionally we place advertising in ski areas throughout the
west.
President, while sounding grand, also implies salesman, customer service
director, ad installer and chief cook and bottle washer. I am responsible, in
essence, for selling the ads (we had a great year) overseeing ad production, and
getting the ads up. I have made sales catls on many businesses and maintain
customer relationships with over 100 current customers.
Prior to August of fhis year, I was VVesfern Regional 11Aarketing Direcfor for
LaSalle Partners, an institutional real estate company. Over my nine year
fenure with LaSalle Partners, I managed high rise affice buildings, brought
projects on line, and most importantly, oversaw the marketing and leasing of
over 6 million square feet of the company's inventory. Significantly, this involved
posifioning producfi in some of the wors4 commercial real estate markets in the
country, including Denver in the late 1980's, Minneapolis in the early 1990's as
well as Phoenix and LosAngeles. I also did a brief stinf as aMarkef PVlanager for
the company's retail group. As such, I was responsible for leasing shopping
t,
.
malls and maintaining relationships with national retailers (such as The Limited
and The Gap). ,
,t
I did well at LaSalle Partners in part because I was able ta develop effective
strategies to market our product under extremely cornpetitive conditions_ I
trained and led teams which very successfully execu!ted those plans. I also had
to get client "buy in" to our strategies prior to implementation. Inevitably I had to
maintain positive celationships with several different constituencies in almost
everything I did.
Developing our marketing plans involved everything from product analysis
(harder than it sounds on a one million square foot office building), market
analysis, competitive analyses, product position, collateral program, time lines
and budgets that ran into the high six figures.
Prior to my tenure with LaSalle Partners I practiced Iaw in St. Paul, Minnesota.
My educational background includes a BA from Calorado College and a JD Cum
Laude from the University of Minnesota.
On the personal side, my wife Chris works for Vail Associates this winter, and my
two daughters Molly, age 3 and Bridget, age 2 attencl day care here in the
Valley. We moved into our West Vail home full time in August. We also owned
a condo in Intermountain between May of 1990 and April of this year. V1le spent
over 100 days a year in Vail during that period, whicri included almost every
summer wzekend. During two of those years, I was cDn my Condominium
Association Board with Jan Strauch.
I believe my background suits the position and hope you agree. I look forward to
speaking with the Town Council. In the meantime, if you have any questions or
if this "letter" is deficient, please give me a call at 476-8528 or 479-9522.
Sincerely,
Greg Moffet
r
a
david mark peel, a.i.a.
at y angemva ter, a.i.a.
. JAN 2 3 1995
architects
2588 arosa drive •P.o.boX,zoz DEUo DEPTo
vail, co 81658
303-476-4506 - -
303-476-4572 fax ' -
January 18, 1995 -
Vail Town Council
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road Vail, Coloraclo 81657
Dear Council Members;
I would like to serve on the Art in Public Places Board for a three year
terme I am currently the Planning and Environmental Commission representative.
However, since I will no longer be on the PEC, I wish to become an appointed
member to AIPP.
Having been involved with AIPP since its inception, I have a knowledge of
its history and would like to continue to help develop the program.
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours truly,
Rathy La nwalter
F_
.
~
January 9, 1995
TOV Community Development Department Art in Public Places Board
Dear Sirs: '
I have just completed my first three year term
as a member of the TOV Art in Public Places
Board. I would like to continue as a member and
am requesting appointment to anot:her three year term.
I have been a permanent resident of Vail for over
five years, and feel very strongly about the roll
assigned to the AIPP Board and it:s impact on our
Town's way of life. I have been able to participate
and contribute during the early c3evelopment of the
Board's policies and activities, attending virtually
all of the meetings. It is important to have at this t:ime some consistancy
and history through established members as we begin tc>
sat new directions and goals for the coming years.
It has been a pleasure to serve on the AIPP Board
and I hope to continue in place.
. Sincerely,
aren Smith
2397 Garmisch Dr.
Vai1,.C0 81657 476-7424
0
SENT BY:Otten Johnson Robinson; 1-18-95 012:28PM o OJRNR (303)825-6525-4 3034792157;# 1
KENNETH M. RO81NS
ATTORNEY a7 LAw
980 SEVENTEENTM STREET, SUfT@ 1BOD . ' DPNVER.COIOAADO 80202 '
TEL• 302 885•8600 FAX: 909 82"585
January 17D 1993.
Aro Georcie Ru$her
A%PP Coordinator By Pax0 303-979-2157
Towsa og Vaig
75 Souta Frontage Road
Vail o ColOrado 81657 .
Da&r Georgeo
gwash to axpress my interest anci desire in continufng on the
Art %n Public Places Hoard of the Towaa of Vail for a raraewed ~erm, •
g have enjoyed my participation on the Boa'rci t,2iese past years
aflc$ believe that g can make a contribution in the futaaxe.
Z'harak you vary mtach Por your considegation.
SinCerelyp
j
r-
- o R 0~1%1~
. . ~ ~
i:
.
iM L.. -FoLZM Ce,u,,,Jc_+ L. TAO-4 2-5-, 19 q 5
Vi4i L_
VA'1 l.. I 6Lz?',4 Czi..tr..l u r_
C m r-4 n NUa r~ C-1 or4 ,Y. iV~r-, 'v'At L 1I?~-t~~ v4-~ ~~~~c? ~
~ (ZS`r&n-1 r~P U~. C~t~ '~.-i ,~t`~ t~'u,r~ti.?~ ~s~ ~ -
cl.., ~ v ? M Sp TlAE-- (3oAR-jO fr-J 19 9 3 P-n-?? Q
-FF-rvlp ~~,ec~ COM~:4-r
0 ;4-L ~ y~.~.~ r~~.~? N c~~
L ~e-AI
'~AIZAaZ.tS iQ-iZ-~ c~tiz~llz.a~-, ~s
I n1 C~ ? T~ ~ 1'`~i6~?'Z-~ ~~~Gt ~11'L-~
64'~u
~ S, Ce,tit n
l~t.y .j I 1~,y44'Lt~ (..:~G~I..t.Lt7 ~?t L'~ ~~~'["t-~^11 IZ~
1
To 1 N v c~v 6P w ~tK 1n4~4T- "S-, L cY1,
~
~
~
~ •
.C
January 27, 1995 '
Vail Town Council
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Roa, Vail, CO 81657
Dear Council Memb:
I am writing to exprE interest in being appointed to the Art in Public Places Board _
(AtPP). Having liv.ec Jll for two years, and having worked in Vaif's Community
Development Depar `or the last year, I have found my interest in Vail's public planning
growing.
Presently I have a ft ~ private psychotherapy practice in Vail Run Resort. My ec -3tional
background is in Ps gy and Symbolism, and I often use art in my work with cl?: 7. I
also believe I pay pi :rly close attention to the changing flavor of community v: s int because of my work psychothenapisto~u a y to always aoc vec commgment toe`., =Y
aesthetics, and wou to have a pp
becoming an AIPP "Jlember.
Additionally, I have .:sly co-owned and operated a photo9raPhY business ;:,r; ~~iemphis,
and have sold art c~ cially for a gallery in New Orleans. I have also worE:-d in the
admissions office fc lphis College of Art, where I often reviewed studen'.~.' ::ortfolios.
I have missed beinc ected with public a nSAIPP Board Pdlembera Thaer. ,u for yourake a
significant contributi, !he community as a
consideration.
Sincerely, •
Marianne McTighe ,
5115 Black Bear Lar, . '2
Vail, CO 81657
(303) 476-8266
_ . ~
i
J. COTTER GALLLR
J X '
A~~~ r 'i~! IL C;~)I_i) ANI) SILVI:f2SA111'I-I ~)i= V/11L
^ Sincr. 1970
234 E. Wall Sl./P. O. Dox 385, Vail, CO 0165a
(303)476-3131
v
December 16,1994 '
George Ruther .
Art in Public Places
75 S. Frontage Road .
Vail, C0. 8165£3
Dear George,
I would be very ini;erested in conti.nuing to serve
on the Art in Public Places Board.
ISineer
im -cott r,
,
tVS a a i H 5 V *LA Yf .5
February 20, 1995
To The Vail Town Council:
Please consider me as an applicant for the AIPP Board. Because of
professional commitments, I am unable to attejid AIPP interviews. I am
a psychotherapist and have an on-going Tuesday group session from 2 p.m.
until 4 p.m., which involves seven clients. This commitment would not
interfere with AIPP Board meetings, which, I understand, are always scheduled
on Wednesdayse I regret that I am unable to attend the interviews, and
wanted to express my sincere desire to become an AIPP Board member.
I have outlined my qualifications in my letter of intent, so I will not
repeat then heree Since I am currently employed part-41-ime in the Community
Development Department with The Town oL Vail, I am hopeful that some of
you have had enough contact with me to feel confident in my abilities.
I will be happy to come in at some time other than Tuesday afternoons,
or can make myself available for a telephone interview, should that prove
helpful to the councile
Thank you for your consideratione
Sincerely,
~
Marianne McTighe
5115 Black Bear Lane, #2
Vail, CO 81657
(303) 476-8266
o A Professional Corporation
d
143 East Meadow Drive 0 ~~~/ARCH ITECTS
Crossroads at Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657 M 3031476-51 Q5
FAX 303/476-0710
'JAN 3 1 TOVo January 31, 1995
com
gi, DEV, r ta Mike Mollica
Acting Director
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Rde
Vail, CO 81657
REo Appointment to the Vail Housing Authority
Dear Nlike,
Thank you for speaking with me regarding the available positions on
the Town of Vail boards.
As we discussed, the upcoming arrival of our first child will
somewhat restrict my free time. I feel the Design Review Board and
the Planning Commission are quite time-intensive, and I am not able
to commit to that amount of time at the present.
However, I would like to be considered for the vacant position on
the Vail Housing Authority. I am better able to commit to that
obligation. •
As you know, I have had many experiences over the last six years
with the various Town of Vail boards, as well as the plann~_~:~? staff
in the Community Development Departmente In the last four -ears,
I have been involved with two affordable housing projects,
including the design of the most recent Town of Vail Affordable
Housing project for the Vail Housing Authority. To add to my list
of experience, I feel I am in "sync" with the "target market1° for
affordable housing, being a young, married, middle management
professional myself. As an employee of Morter Architects and other
firms in the valley, I feel I have the expertise needed on such a
board, that of being an architect in a burgeoning economy in the
ski resort setting.
e
MORTERARCHITECTS
Mollica, Page 2
I look forward to further discussions witlh you on this subject.
Sin re :y,
UIL
Kvle H. Webb
MORTER A:RCHITECTS
P.S. I'll talk to Sally Brainerd for you, about her future as
chairperson of the Design Review Board.
cc: Andy Knutsen
9 ~j' ."J ' - _ - - _ " " _
_ _ - ' _
~ _ Y•
I - '
. • ~ . . •
Gi ' ' ~ ' - ' . . . - ' '
. ~
. . :
' '
.
.R,....~..: .i.1'• _ _
•c,;~:~c-.s... - _ r.~,-:::...:.....,.:.' K Ie ~H UNeb - - _ -
y 4582-A Streamside Circle 303.479.0285:':
~ . . b:~:~`.~-~='.~:`='=:
; s'~ - - _ - ~ - Vail; Colorado~ - - -
- _ _ _ _ - - _
. . ;
:a - - 81657:'
.
_ - ~ ° - _
_ - ~ - - - - _ _ - -
- - - -
;~f>, _ _
. _
- _ - - - - - - - '
-
- - L- -
~r - ~ : - ` - -
' s .
- - - -
. - - -
~ _ _
_ - -
_,r_,, . . . _ - - - - - - - .
, - -
~ .
.
r, . - -
. ~ :C.'
, ~ '
~ -
.
_ _
.
.«F . : - v::•._':'- _ .v..
, . _
C_°^
. , •.._.::==.:._::.~..:~':x' - _ ,'r•'
a.. , r..r-....__.n. . .r. . _~_..l--~._ ' _ - _ - _ - - ~".r~.:.:~
,i . t . , . ~ ~ - - - ' - '
. . . _ . .r i~•
' ' 'i.; _ - _ " ' _ _
- ' ' _ " - 's,. ' "
• ' -
_ _
_ ' ' _ _ ' ~'y„
' _ _
'r -
•'t~
i'Fi L'. -
' - : •
~L+ '
_ '
_
:~di.~: - _ _ ' "
~ _ - _ _ ~ '
~1i. ~ ~ - ' ' '
, `
_ _
_
' ~f
.-Y: '
' *
t.
_ ''y. =
. I~i~ ~ ' _
7r ' "
A
-s: -
'
' _ y " ' ' '
j~.. _ '
4 .
•'-5. ' _ i' -
~r~ -
f.
-t '
- "r~ - - -
-
i~i\. '$i'. - "'1~ J ~t.~~~h'.2~f... _
~ , ~ -
.C.Lt:s.'y - ~ _ - _ - _
- "4~ ' _ _ y:.' , :'~:i
~{i ~ h. - - L s I ~ _ ~ S' _ _ "a
~ T ~ ~f " ~'i ? . - r x
1'4~,..~, ~ .-r': .v- ~ _ - - ~ _1. i :p~ YS - ~7 -
"~y`,~ '•e. ° t:-``~= - - :=?S-• I . y j? ~ ' .~Y a '.t - - t ~ ~ - Ti. ~ ~~~i A - -
yL+.L, h, ~ ' 7 - _ - _ ~ / Q+-, =;k
, t y rtPROFESSIOitIAL.,~XXPERIENCE;` t ~f ~~.t~=- _ t , - -
~ ~ t. r - _ t ==V~~. - ~ ";<^`r.•'y: .
t ,...._.r~ f. 'ANor4er~Architecfs'~ .f~~ _ ~ f - - : _ •~-r:~ :r:. ~r,~::^-~
'~~tiy~ _Y.~ _ '!t~' CJR } . :j•'.~y:- _
OM - ~ ' ' .i• .t~,:i - ! 4':
`~A'r'[I~.~~~.ti:f J''~ Y '.~0~'! r - ..1~- `ti.J:~~ y ~ •'~j-. ~
- w~ _ , Colorado. - - ~ Desi ner~A-:'=
~y~~~.,;Y.: ~,1: ;[~~v k SYY_ _ ' `.^r'.. - _ f ~n, _.Y .tr'~r.,ry '.r.'~._:.
:f: -Ezperiences~ir~clixie~.Towr~ of Vail affordable Housin Pro ec~`~`ti->-~~~ PJovemba~ 1991= "
.~~t'~"' _ ~ ~1_993;~Nuinerous ProJeds ove[ 2stfou~ ears~iri Va'i~and1 .Presenf..` a~y4
' ~ - - . P... Y. _
~'3'~t.q.~k'.' .7 .i.-~ - _ : _ _~rr` _ '{'.r=~ ' '
_ su"rrouridingregion>~;_=>- _ - ,z..~_.'.` - _
sr•~: _ ~J - - - ' ~~,,''z=~~ i~:.
- ' . - 1~` _ ~~ti• -
r.~- _ - ,:s: _ r_ - - - ~ _
- _ ' _ - _ - - =i::i~
t LFri4zlen~ Pierce~Brine. - - -
r_ ~sw , r.;~~: _ _ _ _ , _ _
~ ~ VaiI,~C~ ' ' ~ - ~ ; r
olorado.~`~,, < ~ , - t r Designer,-
~ ~ ~ ` ,7 ~ - - Ezperiences include °Campbelt °Affo'rtiable Housing Projects ` _ Summers 1989 " • ~
: ~ r:,._..
•aa~ ~ . . - . , _ .
- ~9991, Numerous projeds in.Vail and surr~unding'area: ` " 1~990,9991 ,
~ ' ~ t, _ _ ` ~ _ t y--;,~:.~~.:;:
~ti'. ' r =.k , _ y `l~ ; f, ~E
.y , C pT p..~' ~ . f;,,-:~ _
4 ~ a
f:-f~" " GDUCPII ~~Jtl..•~ f _ _ ' t . - .
: ,~Catholrc University~of America,~Washington DC ~ , B.S: ~4rcFi > ~ r
' - ~ .
{'z: r TheSchoolofArct~itedure~8~_Plannir~~s - f ~ May.1990
.
t . filorth C~rolina 8tate University, Raleigh, N.C: - B: Arch.~~~
. ~ ~ ~ - - - - -
- : _ - _
The~School of Desi n. . ~ - - -
9 - - A~a ~ 199
Y -
- _
. .
_ _ _ - ~-.7._. -
~ . Thesis: Cemefery of St. Pauf ~at the National Cathedral, _ ti,
_ " 1Nashington, D.C. • _ _ _ - _
- - _ ~ . ,
~l . - . - , . - ~ . . ~ - - - - - -
. .
. : _
- : . : : . . . . .
~:~;-.:..::K:;... _ . . . _
~ . ~ • ~ ~ ' .
' _ : ACADEMIC EXPERlEPVCE: ~ - _ -
<<_. - - - - _ - - . - - ` - - - -
Honors a - -
. nd ~4ward - -
L. _ _ - s: _ _ . . - - -
S • ' _ ~ . - - ' " _ _ _
;~f'.:': ' ~ , - ' ' - _ - - _ _ ,
~Graduafed Ma na Cum Laude fro , -
9 m No•Jh Y::...'_. . Y _
_ _
: . _ . Carolina State Universit ~ Ma 1991
r _ ' ' Dean s List at North Carolina State Uni~: . ~it " - - - - - -
, . .
t- - - - Y - - ~ - :1990=1991':..
- ~ , - - " -
: Dean s List a
t The Catho
- Iic Univ , -
_ - ersit o~ . merica
- . Y _ _ M8 .~990. -
- - Y
~r?~~:`~`, ~ - n w - ~ -
Second Priie~in O nin New h
, pe 9 Doors T..e 1989-1990AIAS%CADKEYi"`:"°~ A~ri1~1990 -
- - _ - - p - -
. . ,
* : ~ 'National Siudent Design Competition. CADD drawin s and 3D Models '-~=y':: ~ -
- . - 9 - -
. _ . •
: ` _ - ' _"N Street Vllage" Seleded as the conceptuaf design .for a 128,000 sf: Au ust~1989 ~
a,~~"~.= - . - _ g.
~ f ~ mixed-use deVelopment for Luther P1ace Church; Washingtori, D C
' Appointed to Ezecutive Board of AIAS: Cattiolic Universit - - - - " -
: - , ; Y. ` -.1988-1989 . = ~
~ _ ..Co-Product'ion Editor of Ur~is; The Joumal of the Departrrient of 1987-1988 ~ `
-
_ : Archiiedure and Planning at Catholic Univers " _ _ ' ~
tr-• ~ ~ ~ ' ~ t • =
,
. . _ -
~ _ , r ~ - ' - -
,t: ~ : ' ; - " '
,
~
b -
.
~ Pu lish -
ed -
N41o
rk: -
. _ , . . . . _ . _
. .
- - - - - - ~ -
. . .
-
.
. s~ - - - -
. ,
. _ . . . : .
.
, d . . _ _ _ _
_a _ ,Y,
_ . . . _ , . ~
- , - - ~ Gnd a i - -
. ~ . ~a - -
T b e AIAS ' ~
_ . . . . _ . oazine - -
, _ . _ _ _ - _ _
F II 9
- 1 99 -
„ _ - ~
~11 -
_
- r~it.'~ _ _
_
U p
S P.
. . . .
o O ~
st ff (y~
ce at
Tenl
- e
• . .
r~: ' _ ~~V1m . `~i Y _ VUmmP.~ 1 ~7~7U•~
.
-
- . :
r..~;'- - - : $ - - Ocienina New Doors ~ - - - °s:===
: r
, AIAS/CADKEY Com - ~
- ~ tftion Catal " -
- Pe o9~==... -
« - - -
_
- w r. -
. y -
' ' ' _ _ ` _
- A VVrite - -
rs
- Re ea -
U
t. Urt~i~ -
5~ ~
~w
~ - - - •~y~ Fal1.1989
.r. - _ ~"Room ~Glove"'~The Apprentice Writer ` - ' -
;r~,- _ - Y The_'Susquehanna Univ; Joumal~=l=.Fall 1986 . ,~1~.
. ~
- - ~ r-' - '~1 - ~~a w - - - - -
. . ; .
_ .
: .
. . . _ ~
- .Ririged-Ne..~ Duck Pennsylvania Aur'u -
~ ; . _ - _ _ bon Sociefv Jaumal~ . S rin -
r ::c: ;
- _ - . p;. g`1986:"` ~ _
.
_ .
_ _ - - _ - - =
- - ~ -
_ _ - _ ;t -
- - - - - - -
- -
- -
r
:x. = " - -
- ~-IExhibi4ions~ ~ _ ~ ~ -
c~~~: ~ ~ - _ ~ - - ` ' _ _t`,
~ , U.S: Post Office . at A!E/C Sys;ems 90 Conference; Atlariia; Geoigia June~ 1990. °
J : f .
~ -"N Si~eet ~Nage" at Luther Place Pdlemorial~Church; !~/ashington,:D C~:;::.. Summer i989 r~
;r-.~et~~.:' , ~ Two~Plojects"in "University Scholar~" at Catholic University= : September 1987~:
: _ ..y , ~ _ 1 ~ - _ +
~t' . ' ' . ' ' - . - ~ ' , - ~
. ,
rT~ .~.c,' - ; ~'i' - - _ '
. .
:
. ; .
c.'.:.....•~ . . . . . . . - - - '
.~':'r'
. ~ . . . . - -
"
, . . . . . _ . . . , - - ~
. . . ~ . _ . _
r~' . _ . ~ -
ti` , '
. ~ , • . . ~ - ~ -
tiy.... ~ . : . . . -
~ . - . . _ ~ . . ' '
. _
5.•.i , . . . . : . : . . . . . .
t'.' _ . . ' . . . ' . . , _ . . . _ .
.
. - ,
. : . . . . . . . . . ~ .
~ . ,
. . . . . . .
~ . : .
~ " ' ~ ~ - = ~
_ . .
.
•
. ,
. . . , . ,
r_: . , . , • . . • , . - - . , • • _ _
~ - • ' . . . . - •
. _1. . , - - I
.t . ~ - . . . . _ - - ' ' - _
_ . . . : ' . e
_ _ _
. : ,11 (y. .,eoL . s'
' S: - _
. ' j
~ ' ,
y . '
.
.
.AS.^. . ' ~ _ _ . . -
~ .
.
~ .
:
. . . . . 1. . . . . - _ ~
. ' ~ .
. . ~ ~ . . . _
_ _ ' .
' " ~ ' _
. , . . . . :....'._'.'i..:;;',.' _ ' ' _
~ . • , e. . . . -
.__.S...:.....'~.. ' , . . . `1 . . . r . . . . " - . . .
.
_ , Kyle H. Webb - .4582=A Sfreamside Ci~cle ` - : 303.479.0765
~ ~ _ " - _ _ - - Vail, Colorado= - , '
,;;K- ' - =81657:, ,
f~` ~ i t ' ,l. J 'j ' ~ `C. _ _ _
l~r_ > yL 1 I C \ ' L 4 • t '
.k ? x 'i = . , ` y .f ' _
y r `4 '1 • ! k _ ;r '9. • 1 j _
~:n ~,1, , "q . - - i.. t. ~ _ , .E a-a S : 1_ ti, s _ e- l - '
j . J - ~ ~ ~ . . y ! . ~ ~
y . 1 1 ' . ~ .
~ t _ 3 . Y _ , ~ L y - ' • S. i ^ f , 't . .y F , I : f _ ~ r • ,
g~r~: w ,'i . , ` } F . . ~ r _ ~ i . ' t " ` J 5
-<fJ' ~f, - r ,~:c~'.q: . - ~ ~ ; . ci ~ .i.
z< ~ _ t~ r PROFESSIONALEXPERlENCEr ~ c, f y, ~ . ; ; . t _ ~
~ a . L ; ~ v -1~-~ r
, ` , ' _P,~orfer Architecfs ' z,~ < < " , . .
~ : ~ 4t Vail, Colorado ; ~ 2 a yr k:M ' ~ Designe~. ~ .
r.£ r ; - S e
s,, ~ J Ezperience's mcJude Towri of Vail Affordabfe Housing Frojectzf, November 199f- r
4 K.
~ i~' Y '--.1993; Numerous pro~eds over past four yearsin,llai( and r~. y Present
~r i - ` , ~ ~ suirounding itegibn ~ _ r ` t -
i'~ i?" - r ti' s ~ , _Y ' ' t ~ _ t :r ~
_ ; _Frifzlen; Pierc~e, ~Briner i - _ ~ r , Y
r-j< . s 1~ Vail, Colorado - _ ~e f ~ Des?gneFr:,:",.-,i. r `
~ = 3 -.Expenencesinclude"Campbell.'Affordabli~,yousing Projeds:; -~Summers 1989; , ~t
:~;'~^c ~-l-,~-- _ i991; Numerous projects in Vail and surrounding area:.:: 1990;1991 4
r .-2 ~ . - - _ _ . _ , , ' ' y .
y`r'. y- f ' { J _ _T ,
~ ` _ : ~
:uY EDUCATION:.:: - ~ . .
~ -
~ - - Cattiolic University ~of America, Washington DC B.S. Arch =
_ ^ . . . -
; ~ _ : TheJSct~ool of Architedure & Planning - - _ ~ May 1990
. . _ _ . . _
. .
,t,.r:..,.,,; _ : ~ ~ . _ _ - - _ - -
- . - . ; -,North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C::' . ; B. Arch.-; ;
.a-`. , , - _ - _ Ttie School of Design: . . . , - - . - - : May_ 1991.. ' - _ - -
, Thesis: Cemetery of St. Paul at the National Catheclral, = -
' - - - - -
_ . - . . Washington, D.C: . - - - , - -
. _ - , " - = . - . . _ . , ' . - - _ _ . -
_ - . - - - -
. _ . _ _
, . , - - -
. - . . - - •
_ - - - . • ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE:- . . . . - : _ -
_ - ~ Honors and Awards: . , . - - . - : - . " ' _ - ,
_ _ _ _ ' . Graduated Magna Cum Laude. from North Carolina ;>fate University. 'May.1991
: - ~ - - - _ :
_ _
Dean's List at Norih Carolina State University. y ~-1990-1991
-r- ' Dean's List at The Cathofic Universit ofAmerica
: . . . Ma 1990''::
P. - _ . _ , ' Y - y - . -T'"
, ,
, . ; -
, , . _ . -
, ,
. - : - _ _ Second P~ize in ".Opening New Doors" The 1989-19S10 AIAS/CADKEY:."~~,..~ -'April 1990'
Nat+onal Student Design Competition. CADD drawings and.3D Models,: • -
. _ _ " - - ° "N Stieet Vllage" Seleded as the conceptual design for a 128,000 sf: August 1989.; ; =f.::
- ..mixed-use development for Luther Place Church;ll`!ashington, D.C. z'
. P.ppointed to Executive Board of AIAS: Catholic Uni~~ersity 1988-1989 `
~ - - - - - _ : Co-Productiori Editor of Ufiis; The Jouma(of the De artment of_ ~ ~ - -'..1987-1988:,;~- ~ ~ - _
, IP _ :
> =Architedure and Planning at Caiholic University - ` %
y . ~ ~ 1•.:.. a . . - _ < I !
- Published Work:: .
: : _ - . _
"Gnd" Table -AIAS Maqazir~~.~ , Fall 1991 _
~ . ` ` ~ "U.S. Post Office at Tenleyiawn"• : '':.1-.' , : ` ' I' Summer °~g9a 1 : _ ;
r~- 7' '_t", j - ' ~Openinq New Doors; AIAS/CADKEY CompetrUon Catalog _ , > , , '
x . ! "A Writers Retreat" Urtiis'~. : . : " 7 , Fa_ ll 1989± - . _
~
~ , ,"Roomy Glove" TFie Appreniice Writer, The Susquehann~a Univ. Joumal "Fall.1986 _
~.?•'r ~ , , . .
' "Ringed-Neck Duck" Pennsvlvania Audubon SocietV"Joumal , Sng.998Ei r = - _
_ . ~ _ , , .
~ _ - - - _ " _ _ - ' _ : "
~ ~Exhions : _ - ~ _ _ _ - ~
; .
_ "U.S: Post Offce" afA/E/G a>ystems 90 Conference; Atlanta;~Geor~ia .Ju~e-1990
~ . , : - .:.r _ . .
5~ ~"N, S{reet Vllage" at Luther ~iace Memorial Church;lNashingfon, D C :t Su~nmer 1989 =
.Two Procholaic Uni~ietsit~/~ - - ' r: Septem 6er 1987 "
~ 4 _ ~e•ds in „Univ.er..s_ity S - rsw at ' , Cathol ` _ '
°3r ~ 1 . . ' . - y
' .i. . ' , „ ' :,ti. -,.c '
y. ' ' ` . _ - ' . . • _ . . ~ _ ,
> ,
-k=- . . ' - - ~ ~ . . , - - . _ .
-
' ' . . . ' _
- . . , . . . . . . • - ' . • ~ . _
~ ' . . . y . . . . . _ ~ . - . • - . . . .
. , . . . . . . _ . . . . . - . . . ; ' . . ~ , . . • . - 1 .'r_ : . .
a _ ,1 1'~ i -
I _ . _
" - -ie ~ H, INebb; - - -
_
~~1 .K .4582-A Str`eamside Circle':.
- ' 303479.0265 '.'i= .
~l~
_
.
. , _ - " '
.
. ' y.n.. _ . '
.
. _
. . . ~ - - . ' . . ~
. ' : r',. ~
"^i
~ - -
" ~ ' '
. : :
~ . .
. ~ . . ~
. -
- ^'':•_.v_-. . - ' Vail
' .
. . .
' C olorad o '
r.~..r. . _
r ;
.
_ - - - ~ - _ , - -
- -
.
;ti-
T
- 81657 ~ _ - _
o :t;•, - -
~-y` - _ - _
"
- ' r- "
_~r - '
_ - _ . ' -
- = ' -
3'' i' ' ' _
- _~7.~_ - - '
1 ~ '
A~ _ ' `i:•.
. ' ->Y ~ •.fV ..4~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ '',~e".' _ _ .i' i - -
; -y... . _ _
z ti . -
~
_ _ - _ _ - -
a..? . . ' . . ~ , ~ .
c'~ - - " -
' -
. • ' ~
~-.......y.. . . _
-
' ' _ _
.'C _ ' L 'y~:
~
- - r
r ` -
r. - - -
, ti
, J- - '
- _
'.a'~i - - ' f. ~ ^
' _ _
- F_- _ '
`'.S'••
~ _ -
- -
- - - -
- ~ s'• -
;
- - 'ia-:~. .y - - - . -
_ -
" ' ' -
' t, '
v I' . - ~ i• - : ~ ~ ` ~
.;;sS.. _ ,-i~" r~:a_:: _ r _ _ _
~l_ ~ .4=3'' y ~ ~ _ ' ' - ' T '
~ ^y` ' I
h _ _ ' ' ~
-rrY" ~s: - - •t"'., ~ ' ' -
- -
• t
~ ~
- a:
_
: - - ' - i
~C': N •
-
; - ' ' ,
''J ' -
~ •~i., - _
"r. % - ' r:. - - '
•
: `j. ;
'
1 ^4 - .~'i-f.~~
:
_ _ lY
'j..-- ' -
. r ~ r . _ ~
:.2Y T
: . . r., c> _
' _ _
r' ti _ 1'
' ~
; . . . . . ~
~ :T: V,: ;
4
-.'S'- _ - _
'
.~t=~'. ' - 'Y.
~ .
. ~ .f::
,c+:..y. ' ' ri4.' " - ~ ' - ' ' 'ti
' _ (i~
. 'i'~ ri ~ - -
, 4;
. . . :
~
. f s_}: ' - =3` - r,..
. :
'
~ s - . . . _
y - • . . ~ .ti . _ , i.~i.. ._....~,RO^" ' . • - ' - ~
. . ~ti' '
' -r - - - -
: c. ?x.. , . . ; . ~ , -
. ~ . . . . . . '
_ _ i.
_ _ - - '1'.'.:' i 1~, .
~ j`'.-
F~,-' y~ ~ - - . ~ - ` ' - ~ .
.
' : - ' ' ' t
_ _ ~ . ir;''~. .
P 'Y~ i. =
- FESSO I N,4L-EXPERIENCE: -
- f.{ - _ .
_
~t _ •C- .:y~ ~ . LF."~i ~t• " .~~i~=', - -
i - -
1;, • - _ _ _ . , .
. . -
_,f. , _
_ : i'.~ : ::S :
. _...'•,2 ~
. rc • - ~ ~--^..-.s > '--.~.a; .
~ ,:p: _
' 1
T
' ~ ' ~
S _
y ul ~
~
~ - .Y~.' i `.l . 11. f,: . .1. S ' '1 i ~~.N. '
; , ~Q~QY/"~~ C f114@CgS.:: y.. ~ ' ':M ` -
1.~.- :•J: .r'.c _ * r JS. .~,,.'4 :t ,l t..~. i:~r~'.t~ ' .a.. f ~.r •r
fC = - •y_ ~ r - - j '
n sa`?' =ValI''COIG(aCIO1~ - F5 • i ,l' L-'= ' ~ 5:: _
~y,. ~ ( _ ..t.- ~ _ . - a_ .°;-s- , -Designe>-,,.,..,,
~s7 ~ ; ~'z 4 A ,Xf - ~ Expenences jnGude:Town of Vail Affortiable Housing ProJed.~=~ nNovemtie~~199t~ <
~ ' ` ; ~4 ~ " , .1 993; Numerous,projeds.vver past four years in Vail and , „ Presertt . ~ =
`~-y 1' E r , ; ~ ` surruunding region rr ; , ` f ' _ LL ' =
S ' ' . i -.f:if.
r . a 7 ~ : , _ _ . . , .
s ) . . , ~ S ` i ` -
x _ ` ~ Fntzlen, P~erce, Briner - . . ~ - _ ' - -
~ ~ ^ , ~ Vail; Colo~ado ~ . ,F - s , ~ . -
~ % , Designer,"
r _ Ezperiences inGude "CamptSell "Afforciable Housing Projed_s ; ~Summers:1989,:; `s.: r'.
' V'''n< _ . - "Y"
C:r 199•:~ ~ - r 1; Numerous nrojeds iri Vail~and surroi~nding-area:~~'-;-=:; 7890 199 ~ . . ` -
_ _ i T4:'.
i~~C _ ~t• f _ _ . _ - _ f ~ ; - 1 1 ?
'r r. - _ - ' =y~:: _
EDUCATIOtV - ' { - -
_
`•.._.t:.:?:.:. - ~ - -
. .
: Ca4h - -
. : Z,~:
: _ j. ~ - . . ._olic Universi of Ame 'ca
n ashi n DC:~'
. . . tN . ~.W n9to - ~B.S:Arch::>..`::.;;:.:
:
; . . . _ - -
The Sctiool of Archiiedure & Pl _ anning = _ ~ PJlay 1990 ' - -
1 ,
2{ - _ - ,~North Carolina S4ate ` . i '
UniversiYy; Raleigh, N.Ce ~ _ _ B. Arch:: _
, . . . .
~ - • : The.School of Desi9n ' . . , PwPay 1991, : . .
. . ~ , . . . . ~ . . I :
. . .
.
„ . - . - ~ -
. . .
. . . - . ; : . ~ : _Thesis: Cemetery of St. Paul at the National Cathedral,.: : - ~ , - _ .
~ : . : - ~
, ' -
~ Washington, D.C. ' - . ~
-
" _ . _ _ _ . -
.
_ r
v . . _ - - , '
' ~ . - . . . . . - , - -
..'x'~ _ . . , ' . . - . . . I ; , " 1, - . ~ .
. _ , 1 . : _ . . . - -
- -
_ , . ',4CADEMIC EXPERIENCE: : . • . , - - _
. . . - .
. 7. . ~ = - ' Honors and Awards: : - . . . . _ _ _ -
, . . - - - . - . . , . -
- Graduated PVlagna`Cum Laude from fVo,~th Carolina State University.~~ May_9999 - -
.
? : - - ` Dean's List_at North Carolina StatE University.- - - • , 1980-1991-~.
=
. .
; . -
y, . : ; ~ ~ ~ -
- - - `s = an's List at The Catholic Univerit - ~ ~ - ~ ~ .
- ~ ~ ~ ` : ; De y ofAmerica,_.:~ - .May 9990-.:
~ ~ ; Y Second Prize in "Opening New.Doors" The 1989-1990 AIAS/CADKEY , Apri11990 : .
" : ~ - - .
. . = National .
Student Design Compeiition.~ CADD.drawings and 3D Models: - - • - ~
.
: . -
_ . . :
„ " - .
..N Street VillageSelecied as the conceptual design fora,128,000 sf.;:`~::-~~. August 1989;: .
. _
: . . _
; . : : . . . :
. - , _ - : _ - rriixed=use development for l.uther Place ChurcFi,1/Vashin9ton, D.C. : . - _ - _
- :Winted
~ . .
: .
s~.~: : . _ . . . . _ .c . -
. to Exe
= Aputive Boar~i of AIAS: Catholic University:- . . - . 1988-1989 , , - , _
~ - ..Co-Production Editor of Urtbis, The Joumal of the DepartmeM of . 1 987=] 988 -
k-- ' ~ . .
r;- r.;T: _ : . . _ - cture.and Planni nat Catholic Unive - -
, _
`Ai'chite g - - -
_
- - -
. ; . -
, . . ~ - -
_
: , . _ ~ - - - - _ - - - - _ - -
. - _ -
_
. .
. . _
_ . . . • -
- . .
. : -
rii• - - . - - - -
, - - -
- ~ . . . .
~Pub - - - - - -
- - . ' dUNo
he
-
, . `
' _ -
. _ _ . . -
~ lis
-
. -
~..:"i: : ~'r..• . ` w , , ' ' ~
~y ' _ '
: : .
V.. • ' " _ . ~ . -
' ' . . ~ '
. GndA . . T
le . AIAS PVIa a - . - - -
. . . . . , . afb a zine.:..: . _ _
: . . ' . .
_ - - Fall 1991 _
~ . , _ . : . . . ~ . . i.. t _ _ , . , . , . - -
.
.
_ 'J` _ "
_ . . . •..5'.~.:.. - ~ -
- ~ 1,Ili~
nN. - '
U
.S- P
o O
a
- t TenI
w -
~ • - _ Y~o" ~8ummer 1990 - -
~`_c~;~ 3~~Openin4 New Doors; AIA e S/CAD6CEY Competdion Catalog -
- -
` ~ "A NVriters Retreat"' Urbis , ` , r Fall I 989 ~
~ , , a.
~ ~ . ` ^ .FRoomy Glovep-,The Apprentice Writer, The Susquehanna Univ.~Joumal Fal1.1986
~r;= ; ,.Ringed-PVeUc Duck" Pennsvlvania Audu~on Societv Joumal , Spring,19~6 Y -
~ - - , . . - - _ •
. - - • : ~
, .
. . " - - _ . .
_ . , ,
,r,. ~
> -
> _ ~ ~ . - - J*'
. : . - , ' -
. ..i~• - - - ! - - -
. ' . . . . l
3_ - - -
s''^ ~
~ : ~ - - -
. ~ . lbrtions: ~ ~ ~ -
,
- ~C}l~
-
.
_
. . . . -
x: - _ ~ -
-
- - -
- . - _
- -
. _~.r==-.-.::..-_..:,.~.„ = _ -
x~ . . . . . , _ U.S :
.0v_. _ . ; . ~ ..Post Off, - -
iceat A/FJC.Syst,ems ~90~Conference 'Atlanfa `Geo ia : .~Ju - - -
ne 1990:: ; `
; . .
_ . , _
. - - ~ ~ ' ~
, . . . : - - -
. .
,
. :
:~s-- - _ _ N StreetUlla e at Luther Plece Memo ~°T:
_ ~
- '
;F~ - _ 9 ria[Churrti,VVashin9ton , 'D.C:` - Summer198~9
~ , . . . . =
,
_ . =
. 1_ - - - _
, ~r ; : . ~ . _ Two Pro'ects in "Uni
_ .
. . , .
, . _ J _ . _ versity.Scholars"
~ . .
_ , . . ,
eptem
. , .
~..'r,~l:r,•_.... .at Catholic University . - - ~.:S
. _ . _ ` ~
. ~ ber 19- 87~.'- - ;
. . . . . . ,
.
~
[..:5... . ' _ 1'"_
.
a...~.... ' ' ' ' "
: .
_ ' , c~-- . . ~ . ~ : .1.-:
_ ~ _
. . ~ ~ ~
_ - . - _
" . _ _ - _
;I..,• ' - _ '
~ ~ - ' _ _
V _ - ~
' .
.
_
.
- - : _ _
~ 1 . . . ~ - ' - ' _ '
.
r.•:.._ ~ : . . . . r.
- ~ . . ^
^ " r . ~ e :
. " . ' ~ '
. . ~ _
. • t,
J.
i~... : " . ~ _ . .
• _ _
. / . . _ _ _ _ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . . , " . .
. . 't..~ ~ ~ . . . .
. : . - . . _ ,
~ !
, * . . '
. . . _ ~
_ ;
d. _ ' '
y.... .I . . . . _
1, ' . .
c ` -
. . . '
" _ . _
:r ' - - - , . . . , , _
. . ~ r . r .
. . . . , .
. . . , . . _ . . , , . , .
_ , ,
- . . ' . '
- • . ' - - . - . - . . -
,
. . _ .
~ . . . . ~ .1.:. 7 . . ' . . _ . . - - 7
;F`: '=c' - - - - - - . - - 2' _ - - I
~ - - -
-
- - 1 : - - -
' i!: - - - " - - - ' . - . - -
A i _ . 1. . - ~ ; . : " .
~a - Kyle H Webb - _ i,4582 Q Streamside Circle . 30: ~79.0265~= ~ . -
?;r~.~, _ _ . ,
, _ - : - Vai{,.Colorado.: _
~,a : - _ , _ * 81657':: _ ~
Z . J~•
;r < i F
~ ` ' ' r•` !
~ t t r .c t. - ~ F ~ ~t 'rf ` " F , '
- 4'
) v t f~ J t .1 1
~ ~ x' ~6 7. <
~ 5 " ' = ~ .
v. > > i j - I ^ , .
? t s ' i. . ` . } ~ . ~ ! ~ ; ' . v .
~?i j W. ' '"r„y _..r ~ " - t a ~ _ , , T ~ ~ '
'11~ Y `.f' r r A '7.'` yy " - ~ ' :,y. + / . t .
~ ~ ~ ~ • _ r ~ ~ ~ ,15 c 7 , L] :1~.,_, yl . ~ y'~ .
i,;. , ~ , ~ ~ PROFESSIONAL EXPERIE~VCE ~ ~ r ti - > ` } ; `y i
c ~ i . , r~ Y y ~fc< ~ : ~ ? ~x 1 ti 2»~ a - `t.. i. . ~ i
t+'- n~ rMorterArchitects;-~ F - -
~±:~~~r K ;....s.; . j, . , yr.~ • i n ~z t r+s f r~1 4'~ :~a^i~ ~ r
~ t : Vaii,-Coforado ~s - , ; ~ " , _ ~f Designei~,~ f 1
~ r ; ` , _ _ Expenences inGude.Town otVaiCAfforrlable Housing Proled'F ` PJovemtier 1991- ~
~`~=M- ~ ; ' 4~ , 1 993;, Numerous ~rojeds ovec pa'st four-years in Vaif and P~esent , < 'z
~r y - ~
~ . < - _ ~
~ ; , ~ ~ Y surrounding region: ~ , ` , ~ J ~
w
~ - , _ - r~ - _ , r.
, _ . _ _ -
~ > ' ~ :.'Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner " '3 i ; , i ~ } ` ~ ~ ` Z.
' 1 ' - f _ u ' iz: v ; : - Vaii, Cotorado ~ :r' = - j . Designer;_
~rv ' > : - • .
' : - A':• ' Ezpenences incl~ide""CampbelL,Affordabl~~ Housing Projeds.' Summeis'~989,_~
F-P~~~-, _ ; t ,1991, Numerous projeds in Vail'and surrrounding area. ~ ~ 990;199'~ ~ _
" _ : ~ ~ ; s : '
,L:~ - f.: - - _ - s~; ? a _ + -
Y~ - - ~
. . . _./'t'a _ _ J .
r 1 EDUCATION - - ~ -
,
,
~ ~ Ca~holic University: of Ainerica,~YJashington DC B.S. Arch ~
L
Ttie _School of Archited ure 8~ Plannin _
! 9: May.1990 _
- -
"
~ ~ - - _ _ . ~ :
. - _ _ _
_ . .
~ . , .
_ North Carolina State Universr'ty, Ralei g' h, N.C: ' ~ -
_ . h
B. Arc. .
- The School of Design - . _ , . " _ " - May, 1991~.= ~ -
,
, • - . ,
. . - .
, ; ' - . .
r _ Washington,.D.C. • _ - - .
: _ . _ _ - - I _
. _ . .
- - . . - - _ - I - ; -
- - _ . . _ . . : . ~ . _ " . ' _
: ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE: _ . - ~ - - -
~ - - - • . - H and Awards: ~ - - - ~ ~ - _ - - ' -
:
. . : . onors . .
. . . - .
_ - , _ ,
1~,~ - : : _ _ . . . • :
- _ - - . . - Graduated Magna Cum Laude from North.Caro lina ;~tate University: May 1991._. '
- _ = _ Dean's List at North_Carelina State Universiry='-' - - : ~;1990-1991
" _ . ~ Dean's List st The Catholic University;ofAmerica~ _ - _ ' May 1990 '
_ _ - . - - ~ _ - _ Second Prize in "Opening New Doors".The.1989-1990 AIAS/CADKEY , April_:1950 ` . -
- 1 . .
- . : . . , _ . _
~ : - . tJational Student Desi 9 n ComPtition. CADD drawin9 > s'and 3D.Models
~ ~ -
- . _ . _ _
? . .
1.,Y .
_ - _.-"N Street Vllage" Seleded as the conceptual design for a 128,000 sf: A~gust.1989 : .
' - . _ . . ' . '
. '
.
~;f . . . ` : . - = -'mixed -use development for L'uther Place,Church,. W'ashington,,D.G:>:: : -
_ . - ' ~Appointed io Executive Boarzi of AIAS: Cafholic.Uni~~ersity ; ~ -~,.-1988=1989 _ _
~ - Co- Productiori, Editor of Urbis, The Joumal of the De~jartment of `;1987=1988
_ - Architedure and Planning at Caiholic University _
' _ - - . ' - ' - - - _ ~F 2..
_ _ _ ' ' '
~ ~ - Published Work: - -
K ' y ° ~"Gnd".Table A1AS^Maqazine~,`~, ; - r Fa. ~ ll.. ~ ~ 9991`_ , - \ :
~ 4t - - , _ " aU.S. Post Office at Tenleytown.~ : ~
' Summer 1990 `
j~==;;;: _ - f Openinq New Doo~, AIAS/CADKEY Competition Catalog• ~ ` -
f" ~ ~ ` "A Writers Retreat" Urtiis : - " _ , ~ - r ' Fall 1 989 ~ -
- f" . - , "Roomy Glove". The AQprentice _ Writer, The Susquehanna Urnv :Joumaly Fa11'1~98G.~_
¢ : ~ r • . . . ,
"Ringed Neck'Duck° Pennsvlvania Audution Societv Joumal i Spnng 1986=
,,1 L - r 'j- _ - _ _ ;
~j" - Exhibitions _ ~ - 3 ~ , ~ ` _
- "U,S. Post_Office" at AIEJC.Systems'90 Conference; ,Atlanta, Georgia J
une i 990 S
~y.='~ ` , ;"N Street Vllage" at,Luther Place_Memorial Church, V1%ashington;'D.C.:'° Su mmer 19~9
t- r -
~ . - - - i`t r MTwo Frods in"U niversifY Scholars" at Catholic.Universit - z p
Se tembee.9987`;
t~~ 1e y - 1 _ - - - -
,r.-cZ , ' ' ' - _ ' - ' '
~`~n ~ . " ' J Y , , ' ~ .
ki „t . . I ti; ~ ~
r. . . . . -
' - ,
~ ~
- - '
. - • • . • _ : -
-
. . . _
,
_ . .
• ' .
" - - - - - - - _ . .
. , . - . . -
- . . : r _ . . . ; - . - -
. t ~ ',7~'_.~~•~ ~ '1
~
I L ,
RBCHARD D. CLEvELAND JAp =51895
Post Ofi#ice Box 9065 Tov ° M M. D E ~
~lail, Colorado 81658-0576
(303) 476-2585 ,
(303) 479-0303 Fax D ~
,9anuary 20,1995 JAN 2 6 1995
Mp. Mike Niollica 0LwM DEV, DEPTo
Community Dedelopment Department
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
i/ail, CO 89 657
Fie: Housing Authorifiy !lacancy
Dear Mr. Mollica:
Please let this letter serve as my application for ihe upcoming vacancy on
the Todvn of Vail Housing Authority. I am a registered voter in the Todvn of Vail
and currently reside in lNest Vail. 9 have lived and worked in the \/alley since 1978.
I am interested in addressing the housing problems-which this community is
currently experiencing. I have some graduate training in architecture and have had
almost five years of experience in the building industry here in the !lalley. 8 have
also kept abreast of the work of the Housing Authority. 0 believe that 8 can make a
positive contribution to 4he community as a member of the Housing Authority.
Thanlc you for considering my application.
Respectfiully,
Dick Cleveland
f,
de
e4
TOWN OF vAIL
75 South Frontage Road Department of Communiry Development
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21381479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development
DATE: February 21, 1995
SUBJECT: Overview of the Eagle River Management Plan
Staff: Russeii Forrest
G. PURPOSE:
The Eagle River and it's tributaries are geographic features that are a shared resource in
Eagle County. The Eagle River is a sensitive natural feature that provides habitat for a
multitude of plants and animals. It is a predominant visual resource on the I-70 corridor. It
also is a significant economic generator in that it provides commercial opportunities for rafting,
kayaking, and fishing. Also, because it is a valued resource, property values adjacent to the
Gore and Eagle River are beneficially affecied.
The fundamental purpose of the Eagle River Management Plan is to develop a common
philosophy for managing and pro;ecting this critical resource in our region. Participants in this
plan include recreational interest groups, developers, water districts, Federal, State, County,
and local agencies. Each agency is currently reviewing the plan to determine if a
memorandum of understanding could be signed committing each participating agency to
implement the plan, as practical and feasible, in each respective jurisdiction. It is recognized
that each jurisdiction has its' own system and will implement the plan in different ways. The '
purpose of this worksession is to highlight the key components of the plan that may apply to
the Town of Vail and provide an opportuniry for the Town Council to comment on the draft
Plan. The discussion below summarizes the key actions in each of the five sections of the
plan that may apply to the Town of Vail.
89. 1NATER QUANT9TV
1) Issue: Currently, area governments base development decisions on water rights and
the ability of the water districts to provide water which does not always take into
account the impacts to stream flow.
. 1
,
Action: Create an Eagle River Management Committee that could assist in
evaluating the water quantity impacts of development projects. In addition, area
governments will be able to use the Colorado fRiver Decision Support System
by 1997 to help make informed water quantity decisions.
2) Issue: Minimum instream flow standards have been set for the Gore Creek and Eagle
River. These are bare minimum flows to maintain aqLiatic life. This is an inadequate
standard to evaluate the environmental and recreational impacts of development
projects.
Action: Through the Eagle River Management Committee, determine optimal
flows for the Gore Creek and Eagle River based on defensible biological and
recreational criteria. An optimal flow standard could then be used in lieu of a.
minimum stream flow standard for evaluating irnpacts of development projects.
3) Issue: Flows periodically drop below the minimum insi:ream flow standard:
Action: Develop a strategy for maintaining optimal flows using the following
hierarchy:
a) water conservation
b) managed growth
c) engineering solutions (i.e. interconnects betvreen Vail and Avon)
c) creation of storage
111111. WATER QUALITY
1) Issue: Decision makers and the general public need fo be better informed on water
quality issues.
Action: Through the Eagle River Management Committee, develop an annual
"state of the river" report that reviews water quality. Also, close coordination is
needed with the Eagle River Environmental Bu:siness Alliance to convey issues
about the Eagle mine to the pablic.
2) Issue: Although quality is still good, historical water qualiry data shows an overall
degrading condition in water quality in the Gore and Eagle River.
Action: Implement actions in the Vail Nonpoint Source Water Quality
Management Plan.
2
e
BV. WILDL9FE
6
1) Issue: There is inadequate biological information to determine the health of aquatic
life.
Ac4ion: Develop a biological monitoring program.
2) Issue: Riparian areas along waterways provide cCitical habitat for both land and
aquatic organisms.
Acfion: Develop a setback or buffer zone to protect the riparian area.
3) Issue: Water quantity and quality is often not adequate to provide optimal conditions
for aquatic organisms.
Action: Implement actions in qualiry and quantity sections.
V. RECREATGON 1) Issue: Increased number of people fishing are degrading the recreational experience in
some locations.
Ac4ion: Need to determine the condition of the existing fishery and the limits of
acceptable change. After threshold limits of fish are set, efforts to maintain
fishing habitat should be implemented.
Action: DOW and local law enforcement should improve enforcement of bag
limits and other fishing regulations. Also, permits should be considered for all
commercial fishing guide services.
2) Issue: People are often not aware of where to obtain access to Gore Creek and the
Eagle River.
Action: A map should be developed to identify access areas along Gore Creek
and the recommendations in the Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan to
improve access should be implemented. Also, improved signage is needed to
identify access areas.
3) Issue: Specific access sites need to be improved, developed or protected.
Acfion: As part of the Dowd Junction bike path plans, access will be
significantly improved in Dowd Junction for rafting, fishing, and kayaking.
. 3
~
~
4) Issue: Utilities or bridges obstruct boating on Gore Creek and the Eagle River.
Action: Attempt to underground utilities or create enough overhead clearance
to allow boaters to pass during high water. _
. VI. LAND USE
1) Issue: Water quality, wildlife, and recreation are beirig negatively impacted by
development directly adjacent to Gore Creek
Action: Change setback requirement to: "All siructures and land disturbances
shall be located outside of the riparian zone (defined on page 52), or 100-year
floodplain, or 75 feet whichever is greater."
2) Issue: During the public comment process for the P12in, the public stated concerns
about creating additional consumptive recreational uses (i.e. golf courses and ski
areas).
Action: Require that all major recreational projects demonstrate that they wi!l
not negatively impact water quantity and quality and will not accelerate land use
development beyond the carrying capacity of that particular area . One golf
course at each town or unincorporated commuiiity is the recommended limit (as
stated in the draft plan) for golf courses.
3) Issue: Trails sometimes negatively impact riparian areas.
Action: The plan discourages paved trails ancl trails over 3 feet wide in
riparian areas. It does acknowledge that in sorne areas (such as Dowd
Junction) it may not be possible to-avoid ripari2Ln areas because of geographic.
constraints.
F:\EVERYONE\RUS S\MEMOS\ERMP
4 ,
SE~'VT BY' 2-21-95 : 13:20 ;Cammur~ltyDeY~:lOpirieriT,yTOW'N OF 'ti :lL COM-DE~'~# 1/ ~
EAGLIF. RIIVEB MANACEli9E1V'I[' d'Q.ANNTNG 1(°ARTId`.HPANTSn
Af7't,liutaorn!?sn¢emQ Pcn nn
Town of va;s RufLsilil Fngre.se, Plarmer
Towaa ot Avon li/farry Ilalden, Plunnor
Towp1 oF Eagle Jor. Forintash, Ae.r;B. Phgr.
Town of Gypsuen Jeff Shcoll, ManagroP
Town of ARinturn I)ick D:?ngler, ANeemagcr .
Towiu of Recl Cleff C:i! 'fhum:ts, Manabtsr
lEagle finsin4y Elliu Cbvpl, T'Banner '
Kei4h Montag, Cl) Director
Ray A9orry, Le,v;lunacontxl Heaich Manager
Jahn A,ithoff, EngiueeriMarring
Tittnberline'I'ourslRafting Sue.ATattizuu .
Fiship~ Ken Neuhet;kCr
Eagle Vaei Matro Bcwrci Cliuk Stuvuly
A1ae.Pk.Svc.Riveas&'1'raii,% Kay Sata'ar
Bur"u off i.aM Managouiaw Mike Mottice, Francisuo tVlenJo7a, Jay Tl,nmpsoro
USFS/Iluly Cross Dixtr;ct I{xthy Hardy
Vail dasUey/Up1mr Eagle VaUuy
Waterf5anitation Districts Ecl Druager, Yliul TestwuiJe, (Chuck 0.6lby, Dennis Geh•in, 1~irk
MacCutcheon)
Colorscio Division of Wildlife Bill Heioher, F3f11 Andree, Crsig iXlrstuuett, jay Skinner
c:WCB, Flcxodplain Arii+n Hyda
Watet Cornmissioaer Div5,Dise,17 13i11 !4lcEwen
NOt4$We'St C'010YU.ci0 COLnCiI •
of Governments Rohert Rdy, ItICh HpWRYd t1t]CI KCvin l,anclahl
Cnl.l3iv. VNaY. t:nn. Dist_ I
Eagle River As.sambly (,ryirib rreese
Vatl Associatee Psul Tesnvuide, ]oe Macy
Fishing Bruee Keep
Developnie:ut Ccrosultane Terrill Kni,zht
U.S. Asmy Corgs of Enginears Mike Claffey .
Soil Conservation 5ervice Rfck O1szn
Coluraciu Depar4tnemt of Health 1iin M111,rilfo
ERLDA per ];t?Kld Mine Patricix 'I'iek
Vail Vs,11ay Tiities Altr.n Bes:t "
Aurorx Dept of Water ke.vnurc.es,'
Eagle Rivax Ar;.5em6,ly Dc,ug lCemp4~r (Urry llmwu)
6dydtologititlEngineeP L'enn Schore
RaftinglRayaking Dabbia Murquzz
Pir-hing Guide/Pruperty thaner Jamm ]ouflas
Ferhing Alcx S;tack
Prapertty Clwnar/VAiI Councii Merv lapin
Ra r'riex$lECayslcins Darrll IiKUg.., t
FIIIVIA/Regian 8 Virginia N(ocoyam;i
C`ulomdo Divieion of Wildtifr. A,ltuic Ccc:ailcush
Ca)1.I3ept.nf'Tsanspo, 13i1d Pdetsun,l..arry Ahhott,T.J.Smidi
US Env,Prot./t6uncy KitrCn hlamilton
Rocky Muuntain Institute Richard Pinkhacai
TTSIpslsegin D;ritrice PBUIa J~linslun
(PIa88C 6GD lCVCCDC SI(Se)
$E'T.BYFEB 21 '95 11:38AM TOWN OF AVOt`i + 17' 10 ALOmmun: tiyueri: i ur,uru b ;r
' . .
,U. '
. USFS/Supervixors Otl'u:a Jim SimoasoalBibl Kibe •
USFist nad Wi1c11iie Serviod Keith Ruae
U9 aumau of Raciaeaation Brent Vilnnbergillob Alonaan
Co1.I?cptof HeallhlVVatar QUSl. Kahleeet Aoilly, Dicti Parachiai
GWC$, Wutcr Cowrvyliun ChriS Hridges
CWCR, Is-Strmun Asn Merrimaa
Cc3t.St.Pstka,St" ?sailg Div. Cltris rord
Co1.3t.Parks, Westarn Regioa Kwt Mill
Caty of iSanvar Water $carsl Comnussioms .
Cn1oraclo of Bmergency Mgmt,. Robm Xistner
Colotsdo Stol+ i.snd HcmrJ Comus"ioneas
Ksyaker Cinc1Y Mtaaselt
benvezRioGrattdelWoswra RR 3tave Gardop
*Ptudcipation var'tes withsn this 'Committee' Iist. Sc)ene hava etleaJerl aearly every iAeeting (e.r• C.oughr. eer4ain
wwn& xtatelf6d sgenrane, citiams), othem. only one or Lwv but havm askwl. to be kept advised of a]I "vity (u.g,
cestain feslwal agenum uncl jn*r property ownrra). Othm h.ave not attenclecl aey mwitiings bat a&kW qeciSaaliy
to be inolucicd or wem eskecl w parcicipate, iLacJ haves rr.ceived plaaniag info;nnstiun throughaut =d in severa] cae8
hxve retirad'zcally eennmuniratexl infor=tien nr coauc.ata (e,g. falarat and ptx" ngsuec:ies, inwroatnJ sidams). 11is
Iikt dcwtt not roflm the fuxt phaae of gublic partioipacion hnld in August 1994 a(tlwubh 4 fcev of thn peoplo oa this
'Cammittw' malling lic+[ tbat hsd nnt pmvicwsly attended or made commmaau used that pnxms ac an oppartumity to
ootne to S tAeeting or gubiuit Cprmiemts und xro duly pot,xl=n the eicixan psrticipatioo dvctsmqatahan.
~
-
_ I
~
r' -
~
~
.1 l . l.e
d r 1 v.e r
flldfldqement pidD
~ANUAltY 179 1995
~~AFT FOY~ ~~~IEW A CO NT
EAGLE RIVER MANAGEMEINT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUnIIMARY
CHAPTERS: ~ Page
1. INTRODl1CTION 4
Purpose of the Plan
Need for the Plan
Scope Planning Process
Process Participants
How to Use the Plan
Relationship to Other Plans
Common Elements
Other Planning and Advocacy Efforts
2. WATER QUAIVTITY 8
Goals
Background
Issues and Recommended Actions
3. WATER O.UALITY 19
Goals
Background
Issues and Recommended Actions '
4. WILDLIFE - 28
Goals Backaround
Issues and Recommended Actions
5. RECREATION 36
Goals Background
Issues and Recommended Actions
6. LAND USE 50
Goals
Background
Issues and Recommended Actions ,
7. IMPLEMENTATION 611
8. APPENDICES: Glossary/References 66
Public Comments received and actions taken under separate cover
f~~~CUTWE SUMNIARY
~
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN
4
The purpose of the Eagle River iVianagement Plan is to outline actions that can be
taken to protect and enhance the Eagle River watershed. The Eagle River
fVianagement Plan addresses the entire Eagle River watershed which includes the
Eagle River, all of its tributary streams and the headwater lakes and springs.
The Eagle River iVianagement Plan focuses on the protection and enhancement of
water quantity and quality, wildlife habitat, recreation opportunities and land use
impacts.
NEED FOR THE PLAfr.
Although the watershed is a common bond and resource that all the towns and
County share, a unified approach to protecting the watershed was lacking. This is
plan is a first step towards establishing and promoting a proactive; local approach
to watershed protection, placing the stewardship focus on local citizens and
governments.
THE PLANN@NG PROCE5S
The Eagle River Management Plan (ERfViP) was initiated by local governments after
protection of the Eagle River was identified as a top community concern through
town and County master planning forums and surveys. Eagle County, Gypsum,
Eagle, Avon, Niinturn, Red Cliff, Vail, CDOW, BLM, NPS and USFS have worked
together and with citizens to create this guidance document.
IMPLEN~ENTAT0ON
. This plan is intended to be a guide for local decision making and regulatory
revision. Implementation will be carried out by collective and individual effort on
the part of local government, regional agencies and citizens. The plan includes an
action plan for timely implementation of recommendations. The level of
commitrneng o4 ea,ch entity to irnplementation will vary but all participants un the
plan are encouraged to carry on with the cooperative effort to achiede the plan
purpose - improve and enhance $he condition of the waYershed.
COMMON GOALS AND PR9OR9TY ISSUES OF THE EAGLE R6VER
fi~ANAGEMENT PLAN
The following outlines Common Goal's of the Plan and Priority Issues:
The plan is organized into chapters on each issue area. Many of the goals for each
issue area are similar because the inherent connections between watershed issues.
Cornmon goals for all issue and the planning effort include:
1. Determine and provide optimum fiows and quality to maintain a healthy _
and naturally self sustaining trout population, as an indicator species of a
healthy aquatic environment and for a quality fishing experience;
2. Improve the residents' and decision makers;' understanding of and interest
in water quantity, water quality, habitat, recrE:ation and land use issues
which improves the ability to make educated watershed decisions;
3. Develop a comprehensive planning strategy, to meet long range water
needs while protecting and enhancing the aquatic and riparian ecosystenns,
recreation, and aesthetics of the watershed.
Priority Issues: The following issue areas are presented in each chapter with
associated recommended actions.
Water Quantity Priority Issues: 1. Growth Management; 2. Providing Water
Planning Information; 3. Enhancing Stream Flciw; 4. Water Rights
Management.
Water Quality Priority Issues: 1. Quality Monitoring; 2. Public Information
and Education; 3. Runoff Impacts of Land Use; 4. Drinking Water Quality; 5.
Water Quality Linked to Water Quantity; 6. Water Augmentation Plans vs.
Stream Flow Needs. Wildlife Habitat Priority Issues: 1.In-Stream Flciws Insufficient for
Fishery/Riparian; 2. Riparian Habitat Decreasing Due to Human Development;
3. Water Quality Impact of Fishery; 4. Wildlife Solitude During Critical
Periods, 5. Quality and Productivity of Aquatic Environment .
Recreation Priority Issues: 1. Carrying Capacity; 2. Quality of Fishing
Experience; 3. Access; 4. Site Specific Recommendations
Land Use Priority Issues: 1. Land Use Impacts on Watershed; 2. Lack of
Coordinated Planning and Tools; 3. Access; 4. Historical Resources
Protection
Priority Recommended Actions
Priority recommended actions include creating/continuing an Eagle River Watershed
Committee to oversee the implementation of plan recommendations and projects,
development of optimum flow figures for improved water demand/supply planning,
and improvement of key river access sites. For a cornplete list of recommended
actions see Chapter 7- Implementation. 3
~ a-
CHAPTER 1. NTRODUCTMN
The Eagle River watershed. We all depend on it and enjoy the many fihings iY has
to offer. The watershed is an area of scenic beauty with recreation opportunities,
historic sites, and established communities. The vvatershed is almost entirely
contained within the boundaries of Eagle County and provides water for the needs
of citizens of both the vvatershed and several front range communities.
The following document, the Eagle River Management Plan, represents a collective
vision of vvhat it vvill take to insure the.continued or improved health of the Eagle River watershed for the benefiit of many. l'his plan is the product of a cooperative
citizen and governmental effort to coordinate local planning and problem solving
- relative to the watershed. 1"his document shovvs what people with a common
interest can do by working together.
PUffiP0SE OF THE PLAN
The purpose of the plan is to outline actions that can be taken to protect and
enhance the Eagle River watershed.
NEED I~~~ THE PLAN
AIthough the watershed is a common bond and resource that all the fiowns and
County share, a unified approach to protecting the watershed is lacking. This is
plan is a first step towards establishing and promoting a proactive, local approach
to watershed protection, placing the stevvardship focus on local citizens and
governments.
5COPE
The Eagle River iVlanagement Plan addresses the entire Eagle River watershed
which includes the Eagle River, all of its tributary streams and the headwater lakes
and springs. The scope of the planning effort was expanded from the original
proposal to address just the main stem of the Eagle River to a plan that incfudes
the tributaries of the Eagle as well. Some ofi the issues are more prevalent on the
Eagle River and major tributaries than on the smaller tributaries and are addressed
accordingly.
Primary issues of concern identified through the planning effort include water
quantity, water quafity, wildlife habitat, recreation opportunities, and land use
impacts on the watershed. These issues are perceived by citizens and stedvardship
agencies as currently in a threatened or less than acceptable condition and require
attention, or are currently in an acceptable eondition but have the potential to
degrade under potential future pressures.
. 4
' O <
THE PLANNING PROCESS
The Eagle River Management Plan (ERMP) was initiated by local governments after
protection of the Eagfe River was identified as a top community concern through
town and County master planning forums and surveys. The perception among
local citizens and community leaders was that the Eagle River is a tremendous
asset that has been abused in terms of water quality, quantity and adjacent land
use impacts and it's aesthetic, recreation and habitcit values have been neglected
' or degraded. Eagle County, Gypsum, Eagle, Avon, 1l/linturn, Red Ctiff, Vail, CDOW,
BLM and USFS jointly applied for and received a grant of professional planning
- assistance from the National Park Service Rivers, Trails and Conservation
Assistance Program which served as a catafyst for the planning effort to begin.
Other key events include:
*The ERMP officially kicked off in January 1994 with a rneeting of
representatives from the towns in the watershed, local representatives af state and federal agencies, regional representatives, special interest groups
and citizens.
* The group continued to meet monthly through May 1994 with
membership growing to include more interestE:d citizens and agencies.
. * June through October 1994, five sub-comrnittees met to discuss their
assigned topics - wildlife, water quantity, water quality, land use and
recreation.
* During that same period, additional public input was pursued with a
mailed questionnaire and two public meetings,..
* Using this information and the draft chapters the subcommittees
compiled, the committee met to_review a rouc{h draft in November and
December.
* The first official draft for public review was released in January, 1995. In order to develop the plan several goals for the planning process where
established:
1. Examine present environmental, social and econornic issues of the Eagle River
Watershed.
2. Establish common citizen, inter-agency and inter-governmental goafs.
3. Determine public interests, eoncerns and desired future condition of the EagVe
River Watershed.
4. Examine current management and regulatory tools; and compare to the issues,
concerns and desired future condition. .
5. Deveiop an action plan that can be as a guideline by all involved agencies and
governments and accepted by the public that includes recommended regulatory,
policy and incentive tools.
5
PLANftlVNG PROCESS PART9C8~ANTS .
Planning process participants included citizens, land owners, rafting and fishing
interest groups, Towns of ,4von, Eagle, Gypsum, Minturn, Fied Cliff, Vail, Eagle
County, Colorado Division of V1/ildlife, Bureau ofi Land Management; U.S. Forest
Service, iVorthwest Colorado Council of Governments VVater Quality Program,
National Park Service, Colorado Division of Water Resources, Colorado Water
Conservation Board, Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District, Colorado River V1/ater
Conservation District and iVatural Resources Conservation Services. Several other
agencies and interest groups were kept advised of the progress of the planning
effort. - . • . v .
HOW TO US(E THBS PLAR!
This plan is intended to be a guide for local decision making and regulatory revision
within town, county, state or federal jurisdictions.
Generally, implementation of regulatory recommendations are discretionary on the
part of the individual regulatory entity and may have to be tailored to meet the
needs and constraints of each governing entity. ,4ction on these recommendations
is encouraged in order to achieve the common purpose and long term goal -
protection and enhancement of the watershed. iViany of the non-regulatory
recommendations involve a coordinated effort on the part of local governments,
agencies and citizens.
This plan is intended to be a dynamic document that can be revised to reflect the
changing needs and priorities of the watershed and citizens. Recommendations on
who will implement specific portions o# the plan and estimated costs are included
in Chapter 7- Implementation. A priority recommendation, detailed within the
plan, is the continuance of an Eagle River iVlanagement Plan Committee to monitor
implementation. Said committee should be comprised of citizen, Town, County,
State, Federal and water provider representatives with their primary duty being
oversight of the implementation of this plan on behalf of the watershed and the
entities that they represent.
RELATOOWSV-88P T~ OT0-BER PLANS
iViany of the local comprehensive planning documents or zoning ordinances include
goals and policies regarding the river. This Plan is not intended to replace but to .
augment and reinforce those comprehensive plan goals and policies. As with local
comprehensive planning documents, this plan is a guideline for appointed and
elected officials.
~OMMON fELEMENTS
The plan is organized into chapfers, each addressing a specific issue topic. It is
6
- z
difficult to entirely separate each issue because of the inherent relationships within
the watershed. For example, quantity effects quality, quantity and quality effect - -
wildlife habitat, land use effects quantity and quality and so on. Because of these
relationships, overlap between topics exists and in many cases, illuminates which
actions are of greatest priority because of the ability to address several issues by
taking a specific action.
OTHER WATER PLANNING AND ADVOCACY EFFOFtTS
Planning: Eagle River Assembly: In 1993, a consortium of front range and Eagle County
major water rights holders and water providers convened to discuss common
problems and solutions to water supply challenges. In 1994, the Assembly issued
a draft report focused on resolving trans-basin and iri-basin water supply issues
and how to solve current deficits and meet future demand. The Eagle River
Management Plan chapter on water quantity includes some of the factual flow and
consumption data about the Eagle River water supply situation from that Eagle
River Assembly report. The primary difference between the Eagle River Assembly
and the Eagle.River Management Plan is that the forirer is focused on water
quantity and quality issues and the latter examines Iand use, wildlife habitat and
recreation issues, as well as water quality and quantity. •
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (NWCC:OG) 208 Plan Update:
NWCCOG is the designated regional water quality planning agency for Eagle,
Grand, Jackson, Pitkin, Routt and Summit counties. NWCCOG is using the Eagle
River Management Plan as the basis for developing the NWCCOG Eagle River
watershed portion (specifically the non-point pollutioin source portion) of the
regional water quality plan known as the 208 Plan): The 208 Plan is required by
section 208 of the Federal Clean Water Act and is u:>ed for wastewater treatment
plant site planning, local and federal water permitting issues, and directing efforts
to improved water quality in the region.
Advocacy Groups: •
NWCCOG Water Qualitv and Quantity(QQ) Program: As part of NWCCOG, the QQ
pragram specifically works to protect local governmental authority to impose
conditions on water diversion structures. QQ identifif;s, studies and helps resolve
regional water issues. QQ provides advocacy on behalf of west slope water users
quantity and quality positions to the state legislature„
Colorado River Headwaters Forum (CRHF): CRHF is a forum sponsored by the
NWCCOG QQ program. CRHF was established to facilitate discussion of Colorado
River headwater issues. The Group is composed of interested stakeholders fronn
the region and meets on a quarterly basis to share in-Formation, data and views
concerning water quality and quantity issues.
7
MV
CI~APTE6~ 2: ~lATfER QUAi~TOT~( 2.1 GOALS
. ~
The Eagle River and its' tributaries provide water for recreation, domestic vvater
usage, agricultural irrigation, snowmaking, and provides critical natural wildlife
habitat. Niaintaining instream water quantity is critical from a recreational,
economic, and environmental standpoint. The following are ERNiP goals for water
quantity on the Eagle River and its' tributaries, listed in descending order of
priority:
1. Ensure optimuuvi $lows in the watershed to maintain a healthy and
naturally self sustaining trout.population, as an indicator species of a healthy
, aquatic ecosystem. 2. Improve the corrimunity's comprehensive understanding of water quantity
issues.
3. Develop a comprehensive planning strategy to meet long range water
demands while protecting and enhancing the ecosystem, recreation, and
aesthetics.
2.2 Be4C8CGROUND
In Colorado and in other western states, water quantity has been one of the most
important issues for growth. Competition for water has been intense between
front range and west slope water users as well as between western states.
V1/here ample water and water rights exist, development of the towns and county,
recreation and agriculture have flourished. While water rights and trans-basin
diversions have always been a issue in Eagle County, it has only recently been
realized that development in Eagle County could surpass the Eagle River
watershed's ability to supply water for human consumption while remaining a
valuable natural and recreational resource.
Strearvo Flow Characteristics
Stream flow can be measured as cubic feet per second (CFS) or as stream
discharge measured in acre feet (see glossary for definitions). An acre foot is
considered to be an average quantity of water a family of four needs in one year
(Colorado Water Education Foundation).
Discharge of the Eagle River as historically measured at a stream gauge below
Gypsum Creek, averages about 415,000 acre feet per year. iViost of this stream
flow occurs in a short period in response to melting snowpack. About 75 percent
of the average annual runoff of the Eagle River occurs during the three months of
8
May, June, and Juty.
/nstream flow amounts are determined by the ColorEido Division of Wildlife and
Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) to "pre:serve the natural environment
to a reasonable degree." (CRS 37-92-102(3)) InstrE;am flows are quantified as a
flow necessary to sustain aquatic life. Table 1 sumrnarizes minimum instream flow
standards during different times of the year along the Eagle River.
Table 1 Eagle River Minimum Instream Flow Standards
REACH OF MIN INSTREf\M FLOW (CFS)
EAGLE RIVER SUMMER VVINTER
Cross Creek to Gore Creek 50 2:0
Beaver Creek to Lake Creek 85 3 5
Lake Creek to Brush Creek 110 4-5
Brush Creek to Colorado River 130 510
NOTE: Summer = May.1 through September 30, VVinter = October 1 throughi
April 30
Exist6ng Water. Storage Facilities _
In many river basins, dams and reservoirs capture a portion of the spring runofi: so
that water can be stored for drier periods of the year. There are four storage
facilities in the Eagle River Basin:
1. Homestake: The largest reservoir is Homes;take Reservoir which is
located high in the headwaters of the Eagfe on U.S.F.S. land southeast of
Minturn. Homestake reservoir delivers approximately 20,000 acre feet per
year to the cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs. Its storage capacity i;s
43,000 acre feet. Recently, a three year agreement was signed between
Aurora and a group of local water provider districts that calls for release of
300 acre feet of water from the Homestake Reservoir to augment flows in
the Eagle River during dry periods.
2. Climax Reservoirs: Climax Mine also has txrvo private reservoirs, Eagle
Park and Robinson Reservoir which together have a 6,000 acre foot capacity
and are used for industrial purposes at the mirie, tailings impoundment and
distilling. The Eagle Park Reservoir is currently being reclaimed and could be
9
~ -
available for augmenting flows in the in the Eagle River watershed.
3. Black Lakes: Black Lakes 1& 2 Reservoirs are designed for augmenting
flows in the Eagle River watershed (specifically Gore Creek) and have a total
capacity of 300 acre feet. Located on U.S.F.S. near Vail Pass.
4. Nottingham Lake: Located within Town of ,4von. A recreation facility as
well. Has 100 acre feet of storage capacity.
5. Sylvan Lake: In November of .1994, the Town of Eagle and the Colorado Department of Natural Resources signed an agreement to utilize Sylvari Lake
to provide storage for the Town of Eagle.
f. Lede Reservoir: Private reservoir on U.S.F.S land south of Gypsum. Built
Constructed for agricultural uses but some water leased to Gypsum. Also
used for public recreation.
Water Usage
Since the Eagle River is in the headwaters of the Rocky Mountains, water
availability is very dependent on precipitation, particularly snowfall. The ability to
use the water for a consumptive use is dictated by water. rights.
A very simplified explanation of water rights is that water users must acquire
water rights to use water when there is no available un-allocated water. Water
rights have a quantity associated with the right and a priority date (the year the
right was decreed). V1/ater users with the oldest or most senior water rights have
the first priority for water during dry periods when there is not enough water to
meet all demands. The most senior rights in the upper Colorado River are the
Shoshone Power Plant and farmers in the Grand Junction area (referred to as the
Cameo Call). V1/hen the Eagle and Colorado rivers are low, these water users have
the first priority for water usage during these times. This affects how water can
be diverted or used in the Eagle River.
In the Eagle River there are two major uses of water:
a) Trans-Basin Use
b) In-Basin Use
Both types of users are affected by the available water and the water rights in the
basin. The map following this chapter is a map of the Eagle River Basin that
displays municipal diversions (in and out of basin) and where water is returned
from waste water treatment facilities.
10
Trans-Basin Use
Trans-Basin Use involves transporting water from one watershed to another via
diversion systems. There are four diversions.that taEce water out of the Eagle River
watershed and transport it to certain front range citiE;s. These diversions include
the:
-Wurtz Ditch (City of Pueblo)
, -Ewing Ditch (City of Pueblo)
-Columbine Ditch (City of Pueblo)
~-Homestake 1 Project (Cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs)
Together these diversions transport approximately 34,000 acre feet of water tc? the
front range each year. Trans-basin uses result in a 100% consumption of water
since. none of the 34,000 acre feet is returned to the Eagle River Basin. Diversion
points are depicted on the map accompanying this chapter.
Timing of Trans-Basin Diversions It is important to note when out-of-basin diversions occur in relation to stream
flow in the Eagle River. Figure 1 displays stream flow for an average year and a
dry year. Trans-basin diversions occur during the spring melt o.ff when flows are at.
• their highest and can not occur during low flow periods because of the existing
senior water rights on the Colorado River. This basically reduces the intensity of
spring melt flows and does not affect in-basin uses. It should be noted that high
spring flows are important for "flushing" sediment out of the river in order to
maintain optimal aquatic habitat (Calow, 1992). Ho-wever it is not known how
much of a"flushing" affect is needed to maintain oFitimal habifat for aquatic lifie in
the Eagle River. -
Figure 1. Average Year Dry Year
s~ Fa
e...,
.
t 4
~ (
0 0
~ tL
E
m m
~
N~EWYq fq
' p SPMmFbw O
C C
O Q
E ~ E
< a
.-e......,,.a.
ow.m,
MMum
" Wown ~ 1Mwwn ww
\
F-YNwn Fb+r w. Mi. ~ .
in. iW. W. br. Yt. Jw Y tiR Srt 06 Mw. 0.e aw rr. nw. .w. ain. a~.
ti7.
On-Basin Q/se .
In-basin water use consists of all water uses that take water from the watershed
for use within the watershed. In-Basin water users in Eagle County divert water
from the Eagle and its' tributaries but unlike trans-basin users, they typically return
water back to the Eagle River watershed. Therefore, it is critical to look at where,
when, and how much water is diverted and vvhere water is returned to the Eagle
River. The following is a description of in-basin water users and typical return
flows:
1) Domestic users take water out, treat it, provide it for homes, and
businesses, treat it at a waste treatment faeility (typically downriver from the
diversion), and then return approximately 90% of the water originally diverted.
However, it should be acknowledged that there can be a significant depletion in '
stream flow between the points where water is diverted and returned at a waste
water treatment plant.
2) Snowmaking usually takes watec from the river in October, November and
December. Approximately 80% of the water is returned during the spring melt
(when flow is high) and the rest is lost to evaporation.
3) Golg Courses also divert water for irrigation. A well- managed golf course
uses water efficiently in that they only divert what is needed to maintain the turf.
However, well-managed golf courses are considered to be 100% consumptive
because there is typically no measurable return flow.
4) Agricultural users in Eagle County take water out at established diversion
points through. irrigation systems to grow feed for livestock. Return flows can vary
significantly depending on the quality of the irrigation system but can,range up to
50%, with the rest being lost to evaporation, plant use and deep percolation.
Agricultural run-off also contributes to sediment and nutrient loading in streams
and lakes.
!~laYer DeficiYs
Stream flows have been below minimum instream flows during the late summer
and winter during dry years. The frequency and duration of minimum instream
flow deficits (depending on the location on the Eagle River) varies from once every
1 to 5 years.
Fish "kills" have been recorded when flows have been above minimum instream
flows perhaps indicating that minimum instream flows may not be adequate to
protect trout populations throughout the length of the Eagle River. It should also
be noted that historic flows dropped below minimum instream flow standards on
portions of the Eagle River before there where either in-basin or trans-basin
diversions. This would suggest that there may have always been stress on trout
12
populations during natural low flow periods. Additional biological monitoring is
needed to determine the relationship between water quantity/quality and biological • -
indicators.
It is estimated by the Eagle River Assembly (1994) that to ensure that water levels
do not drop below instream flows, an additional 3,300 to 4,000 acre feet of water
needs to be stored and released into the Eagle River during dry times of the year,
typically late summer and early winter. It has been estimated by the Eagle River
Assembly report (1994) that 5,200 to 6,500 acre feet may be needed to ensure
mini,mum instream flow as the County approaches "build-out" of already approved
developments.
2.3 ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED ACTIOIVS
The following issues that have been identified through the planning process arE:
listed in priority order, followed by discussion and recommended alternative actions
to address these concerns.
Issues: 1. Appropriate Growth
2. Water Information for PlannincI
3. Instream Flow Deficits
4. Water Rights Management
2.3.1 ISSUE: APPROPRIATE GROWTH
During Phase I of the citizen p~rticipation process fcir this plan, a majority opinion
was that growth in the watersned should be based on wate: availability and other.
natural and man-made thresholds.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Master Plan Policies •
The County should act on the citizen recommendation (obtained throughl
public input) that the Draft Eagle County Master Plan should provide specific
recommendations for directing and controlling growth in 'Lhe County bas-ed
on critical natural and man-made thresholds, particularly for water avat~V,!0ility
that should be incorporated into the County Master Plan and other future
planning efforts.
Other carrying capacity thresholds that should be identified include habitat
loss, air quality, and transportation corridor capacity. These should be
determined and understood so thaL informed long-range development
decisions can be made. The Towns should also incorporate this concept into
13
applicable future planning efforts, particularly master p{an updates.
2.3.2 ISSUE: WATER INFORMATIOfV FOR PLAiVIVING
An informational source is needed about the Eagle River so that development
decisions can be made with an understanding of available wet water and how a
development project might affect quantity and quality in the Eagle River.
RECOMiViERIDED ,4CTIOiVS:
1. Eagle Rivep Managernent Cornrnittee
Create/continue an Eagle River Management Committee. Key functions of
this committee would be to provide information/education on the Eagle River
for decision makers (towns, County, etc.) and the general public, and to
oversee the -continued implementation of the nfianagement Plan. The
Committee should include citizen, local and regional government and water
provider representatives, at minimum. The Committee's role would be
advisory, not regulatory.
2. Determine Optimal IFlows
As a priority of the above Committee, establish a cooperative effort between
the Division of Wildlife, CWCB, recreationalists, water users/providers and
governing entities to determine an optirnal flow for Yhe Eagle River and
tribu$araes that has defensibfe criteria. This optimal flow should then be
used as a target flow when reviewing projects that may affect water
resources. The Eagle River Management Committee could initiate the
effort, in cooperation with other on-going water planning groups.
This effort should also include a complete study of water use in the
watershed by identifying major water consumers in the watershed,
consumptive use, actual supply, and estimated projected demand for the
entire watershed.
3. Colorac?o River Decision SupporY Systern
Utilize the Colorado River Decision Support Systerri to make informed
decisions related to water quantity. This is a state sponsored computerized
system that has stream flow information and modeling capabilities to allow
water planners to make informed decisions on water development projects.
This system is planned to be avai{able in 1996 or 1997.
4. Water Plan Review ,4ssistance
County and applicable towns should collectively contract with a water
analysis consultant on an as needed basis to review proposed water p8ans
.14
for proposed development, to augment review services currently provided
for some projects by the Division of Water Resources. • 5. Groundwater Sensitivity Study
Proliferation of individual wells in the County could lead to water quantity
impacts. Ground water wells, due to the geology of the area, can divert
water from the Eagle River and it's tributaries,. As technology advances
allow, perform a groundwater sensitivity study for the Eagle River watershed
to determine what the groundwater supply potential is in the watershed
based on underlying geology and other factor;,.
2.3.3 ISSUE: INSTREAM FLOW DEFtCITS
Stream flows drop below minimum instream flow st-andards and deficits will
continue to increase in frequency as the County continues to develop.
RECOIVIMEIVDED ACTIONS: The recommended approach to addressing the stream flow issue is to determine
the optimal flow of water needed in the Eagle River and its' tributaries during
different times of the year (as previously recommended), then the Eagle River
Management Committee_should evaluate the following menu of specific actions to
determine the best local approach to obtain an optimal flow:
1. VVater Conservation
It is recommended that every effort be taken to first implement conserveitioro
measures, in tandem with examining how to inanage growth through loc.al
control. A water conservation program must be watershed-wide with a
focus on landscape irrigation. Encouraging or ignoring wasteful practice:s
does not promote protection or enhancement of the Eagle River watershed.
A. Specifically target landscaping irrigation, golf courses, hotels and
residences for water conservation.
B. Revise local -water rates to increase over a certain amount of use.
C. Require raw or gray water irrigation systems for any new golf course or
landscaping projects with over 22,000 squarE: feet of irrigable area.
D. Reward water conservers with reduced rates or other incentives.
E. Restrict daytime watering.
15
F. Request that water providers jointly fund a"water cop" and encourage
- - citizen reports of violations.
G. Require eva$er effiicient landscaping and irrigation plans through the
development process and jointly fund a trained professional to review these
plans for effectiveness. H. Use the Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District example to
set-up acounty-wide water consePVation program that applies to towns and
County which has voluntary and mandatory components. I. Conduct awater conservation review of all buildings, facilities and
{andscaping owned and operated by the towns, County, and metro districts.
J. Require the installation of water conserdagion devBces in all buildings and
irrigation systems.
H. VVork with local 1A/ater Commissioner to determine efficiency of dBgch
irrugation systems and if there are methods for improvement of flow and
return that local entities could assist with.
2. Growth Management
Growth managervien$ tools can balance the rate of growth with natural and
man-made carrying capacities and community values. The following are
recommended methods to investigate:
A. Buy development rights or property to control the rate of in-basin water
consumption through open space funds from towns and County.
B. Limit the number of building permits granted each year, based on
estimated carrying capacities.
C. Limit number of water taps granted each year, based on estimated
carrying capacities.
D. Initiate a Jointly funded study to detePrnine $he economic Bvnpac$s of
growth management on Eagle County to control future water demand.
Include an analysis of the other consequences of growth management -
reduced rate of habitat loss, etc. - for a balanced perspective.
3. Storage and Engineering
Investigate the following storage and engineering solutions to reduce the
frequency of minimum stream flow deficits and augment supply:
16
A.. It is recognized that some form of storage may be needed to protect and
enhance stream flows during low flow periods. A reservoir or several small - -
reservoirs could provide additional water storage for the Eagle River
watershed. A reservoir proposal would need to carefully evaluate the
environmental impacts (positive and negative),, evaluate hydrologic impacts
to the Eagle River, examine the socio-economic pros and cons, and provide a
long-term solution for water usage in the EaglE: River watershed. The cost
, for a reservoir ranges from $4,000 to $8,000 per acre foot and can take a
considerable amount of time to design, receivo permits and build. Reservoir
development must be addressed through specific proposals that are subjE;ct
to the appropriate federal, state and local govE:rnmental processes at the
time they are formally proposed. A reservoir EiIso has potential recreational
benefits.
B. Pump back systems, such as between Dovvd Junction a.nd Vail, can help
increase flows in between diversion and return flow points. Whiie useful in
specific areas, they are not a watershed-wide solution for improving flovws. •
C. Require consumptive uses such as golf course and snow making
operations to incorporate storage in the golf c;ourse and snow making
operations to mitigate the impacts of their seasonal withdrawals.
4. Protect lnstream Flow .
Implement policies to eliminate practices that negatively impact instceam
flow:
A. Evaluate all proposals involving water use (development, snowmaking
operations, etc.) on whether they contribute to minimum instream flow
deficits (or optimal flow when established). Projects that are found to crE;ate
deficits without adequate mitigation (i.e. "wet: water" contributions to
stream flow) should be denied. For example; water augmentation from
Green Mountain Reservoir in the Upper Colorado River drainage does not
contribute any "wet water" to the Eagle River watershed and should not be
considered adequate mitigation.
C. Require that all development proposals prave availabiliay of water ria6its
and water supply ("wet water") rather than awailability of water rights orily.
D. Require that proposed development grant all water rights associated with
-the project and/or subject property to the local existing water district (i.e.
Town of Eagle policy).
E. For uses that propose seasonal, intensive applications of water, evaluate
for measures that insure reasonable recharge of groundwater as opposeci to
excessive run-offi or evaporation, as part of tFie land use review process.
17
- 2.3.4 ISSUE: VV,4TER RIGHTS fViANAGENrEIVT Long-range water planning is difficult because of the number of entities involved in
water issues in fihe Eagle River watershed - developed and conditional rights
holders from the Front Range, many local water districts, other rights holders and
local governments.
RECOMMEiVDED ACTIOfVS:
1. Work with Frong Range Communities ,
Continue dialogue with the front range communities so that there is clear
communication on any proposed use of conditional water rights and so thart
Eagle County water users can work proactively with the front range rather
than reacting to water development projects through costly legal
proceedings.
2. Special Districts
Encourage consolidation ofi special districts where there is an economic
benefit to consolidation and service levels can be maintained or enhanced.
Through the development process, discourage the proliferation of small
service districts. Do not approve the creation of new districts when services
are available from an existing district.
3. @Alater Rights
Purchase or acquire water rights as a cooperative efifort between
governmental entities and in-basin water providers.
18
~
EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED
~ WATER QUANITY ISSUES
~
.
WATERSHED BOUNDARY
~
~
/ i
LEGEND
/k STATE Of COLORADO
FORESS SERVICE
BUREAU OF LAND MANACEYENT
PRIVATE UWO
/ ~ / i . ~ ~ . ~ • YUNIGPAL DNERSIONS
. ~ /
TREATED WASTEMGTER RETURNS
O STORACE
_ ._rr~ if i / i i, . 'l'i " ,
INSTRFJW FL01N OEfICITS
(OTMER DEFICrrS E%15T
ON TR19UTARIES)
WATERSHED BOUNDARY
~ AX
EAGLE COUNTY LINE
I O~
aiwxe scNa
~
CHAPTER 3: WATf~~ ~~AUTY f,
. . ~
3.1 GoALs -
The following are ERiViP goals for water quality on the Eagle Fiiver and its tributaries,
listed in descending order of priority.
1. Protect and enhance water quality in the Eagle River and its tributaries.
2. Research, characterize, understand, and document trends in water quality
in the Eagle River.
3. Provide watershed water quality to maintain a healthy and naturally self
sustaining trout population, as an indicator species of a healthy aquatic
ecosystem.
4. Develop better community understanding and interest in water quality.
5. Develop a consistent underlying philosophy for improvement of land
management practices which impact water quality.
f. Generate and implement a mechanism to ensure that development
approvals are made congruent with deliverable "wet water" in the interest of
water quality. •
3.2 BACBCGR0UND -
Water quality in the Eagle River watershed is a reflection of the land uses and
practices in the watershed. Generally speaking, water quality in the Eagle River and
~ its tributaries is better than the state standards for drinking water, the protection of
aquatic life, and recreation uses. However, water quality in certain segments of the
Eagle Ri.ver is degraded periodically by natural causes as well as human activities
including: agricultural practices, construction activities, hazardous materials spills,
mining, road sanding,.urban stormwater and snowmelt runoff, water diversions, and
wastewater treatment plant discharge under low flow conditions.
Sete Specific Ettarnples of Quality Problems
In Gore Creek, sediment, nutrients, and dissolved oxygen conditions have degraded
due to development in the Vail area. These trends could occur in all areas prone to
development unfess mitigating steps are taken.
Although metal concentrations in the Eagle River downstream of the Eagle Mine
have significantly improved, fish and aquatic insects are still impacted by mine
19
discharges as far down as Edwards.
Lower in the Eagle River, from Edwards to Wolcott, and from Eagle to Gypsum, fish
die periodically, due to poor water quality, increaseci water temperature from loss of
stream side shading, and habitat disturbance and destruction. ,
A significant source of sediment, which smothers aiauatic life, comes from the Milk,
Alkali, and Ute Creek drainages. This is due to the Iiighly erosive sediments which
can easily be washed into the creeks during spring Isnow melt and runoff from rain
storms.
Public Opinion
Based on citizen comment through public meetings, written material, and surveys,
the public perceives many threats to the river. Mos1t of the development in the
watershed (as in most mountainous areas) occurs along valley bottoms in fairly, close
proximity to water features. As the watershed beccimes more developed, additional
measures to protect water quality will be necessary to maintain existing water
quality. To improve water quality in degraded areas of the watershed will require
even more effort.. Specific actions will need to be tziken in order to protect water
quality from the impact of those activities previously mentioned.
3.3. ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
The following issues that have been identified through the planning process are
listed in priority order, followed by discussion and recommended alternative actions
to address these concerns. -
Issues: Water Quality Monitoring and Funding
Public Information and Education
Runoff Associated with Land Use/Water Quality Impacts
Drinking Water Quality Protection
Water Quality Linked to Water Quantity
Water Augmentation Plans vs. Stream Flow Needs
3.3.1 ISSUE: WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND FUNDING
Individual agencies monitor water quality for their owm purposes without regard to
long term goals, coordination between agencies, and other monitoring efforts.
Organization is lacking in attempting to assess existing water quality and trends
throughout the watershed. No mechanism exists in IEagle County for continued
watershed planning and management. Funding for water quality monitoring ancl
water quality improvement projects are available, but limited.
20
RECOrVifViENDED ACTIOfVS:
1. Eagle Rider Managernent Cornmittee
Create/continue an Eagle River Management Cormmittee to compile and assess
existing water quality data (physical, chemical, and biological), data needs,
trends, etc. This Committee should include the T'owns, County, State !lVater
Quality Control Division, Division of Wildlife, and water and sanitation
districts. Other potential participants could include fiederal agencies with
water quality/quanfity interests (USF&WS, USFS, BLiVi, EPA), and Vail •
Associates. The group should meet on a regular and continuing basis. The
Committee should have the ability to expend funds for monitoring, data
- analysis, project development and implementation, and public information
dissemination. iVear-term priority projects should include:
A. Review of existing monitoring programs such as River Watch, etc. and
perform biological monitoring to answer questions concerning water
quality impacts on the biota;
'
B. Review previously gathered data, studies (e.g. BLNi, "iinilk-Alkali Creek
Watershed Plan", 1985) and new information, and encourage
interagency cooperation with private landowners to implement
strategies on fViilk, Alkali, iViuddy and Ute Creeks to control the Eevels o$
sedirvient that those streams contribute to the Eagle River. Determine
where opportunities exist for local agencies, water districts, citizens
groups, etc. to contribute to the on-going efforts by the BLM to control
those sediment flows;
C. Explore alternative gunding mechanisms for water quality and quantity
protection/enhancement. ' .
3.3.2 ISSUE: PUBLIC IiVFORMATIOIV AfVD EDUCATION
The public could be better informed on water quality and quantity issues in the
watershed, including land use impacts on water quality, what individuals can to
protect/enhance water quality, and who are potential major polluters and water
consumers. RECOiV1fViEIVDED ACTIOfVS:
1. Public fEdtacation Program
Develop a public education program to: 21
A. Inform citizens of activities which impaict water quality and how those
activities can be modified. - '
B. Produce an annual "State of the River" report for public information.
This document could be produced by the Eagle River Management
Committee and coordinated with the S-tate 305 B(re: Clean Water Act)
report and program.
C. Publicize ways that citizens can reporf water quality concerns (illegal
4
dumping, erosion control problems, fish kills, etc.).
3.3.3 ISSUE: RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH LAND USE AND IMPACTS ON WATER
QUALITY
Numerous land uses have documented impacts watE;r quality, and it is highly IiBcely
that future development will further impact water quality. RECOMMEfVDED ACTIONS:
1. Best Management Practices
Implement appropriate Best IVlanagement Prac:tices (BMF) for the watershed.
These include, but are not.limited to:
A. Management and Monitoring BMP's
B. Household and Citizen Involvement BMP's
C. Development and Construction BMF"s
D. Transportation and Parking Lot BMP''s
E. Individual Sewage Disposal System BMP's F. Gravel Mining BMP's
G. Agricultural Uses BMP's
H. Logging BMP's
1. Recreation BMP's
A. Management and Monitoring BMP's:
1. Develop municipal stormwater managennent plans.
2. Storage of toxic materials should be continuously monitored throuclhout
the basin by local emergency service and environmental health
agencies.
3. Identify and research physical stream erihancement projects (stream-
side tree planting, in-stream aeration structures, stream side sediment
control structures, stream bank erosion control, stream channel
modification, etc.) for implementation on private or public lands.
22 -
4. Encourage proponents of water development projects to provide $he ' - uninimum $low based on methods used in determining effluent limits -
whenever possible so that project related increases in wastewater
treatment costs are avoided.
5. Require mitigation of negative water quality impacts associated with
water use and development to the eutent allowed under State o$
Colorado law.
6. Require runofg filters and drainage plans to be in continually working
order, i.e. Vail Parking structures, and make semi-annual inspection as
part of enforcement plan outlined in Chapter f- Land Use.
7. Locally monitor Superfiund site, mine seepage and possibility of blow-
out, establish an semi-annual area briefing by the EPA and State on the'
status of the clean-up to continue until the area has been declared
reclaimed and fit for preservation. V1/ater quality monitoring has shown
(and public perception is) that the Eagle Mine and other mines still
contribute pollutants to the watershed.
8. $rade Bands to obtain riparian areas.
9. Develop wetlands protection prograrn to enhance existing regulations.
B. Household and CiYizen Onvolvement BMP's:
1. Pass and enforce "pooper scooper" ordinances in urban areas for pet
wastes.
2. Provide a mechanism for citizens to dispose of household hazardous
materials in an environmentally sound manner.
3. Develop Public Inforrriation Program (see 3.3.2).
C. DevelopmenY and Construction BMP's:
1. Enforce erosion and sediment control requirements for construction
sites. Performance bonds, a common method, are proposed as a
means of ensuring that erosion control plans are implemented. Erosion .
and sediment control plans should include:
*Disturbance management and revegetation plan
*Timing of disturbance
#,4rea controls (limiting area of disturbance at any one time)
*Soil stabilization during disturbance
#Site monitoring and maintenance during disturbance
#Post disturbance monitoring
2. Ensure that developers obtain and comply with state requirement for
Storrriwater Permits for construction activities on areas greater than 5
acres in size. It is recommended that local governments exceed state
standards and require a stormwater plan and permit for any disturbance
of over-3 acres and/or more than one residential unit.
3. Prohibit soil disturbance on slopes greater than 30 degrees.
4. Ensure adequate stream setback "Buffer Zone" requitements . V1/ithin
23
"Buffer Zone" do not allow: soil disturtiance, vegetative disturbarice
(other than minimal pruning of shrubs), lawn mowing, fertilizers and - '
pesticides. This includes residential, cammercial, golf course,
recreational, agricultural, and logging land use areas. (see also Land Use
Section re: setbacks)
6. Require storm water detention and water quality enhancement facilities
for all PUDs.
7. Encourage use of constructed wetlands to enhance stormwater and
snowmelt runoff water quality.
8. Prohibit direct discharge of stormwater to lakes, streams and wetlands.
Requirement that all stormwater runoff be treated (detention ponds,
. constructed wetlands, infiltration, grassy swales, etc.) prior to
discharging to streams or river.
9. Regulate the amount of impervious surfaces to ensure ground;~~ter
recharge and decrease flooding concerris. Require disconnectin4;
impervious surfaces:
10. Require use of grass swales and porus loavement where appropriat:e.
, 11. Require stormwater infiltration facilities where appropriate due to
impervious surface concerns.
12. Require developments to maintain pre-development hydrologic
conditions through engineering solutions.
13. Encourage cluster development (easier i:o provide stormwater quality
improvement).
14. Prohibit industrial uses or any other uses that involve hazardous
materials from land adjacent to the river corridor and tributary va;ieys.
15. Golf Courses must include a manual of water quality best managernent
practices in their submittal for approvals. Goff course must include
features to prevent run-of# into adjacernt water features (berms,
retention, filters, groundwater recharge, etc.).. Review of plans for golf
courses could necessitate a fee for outs-ide professional evaluation of
the BMP and drainage plan. A fee coulci also be assessed to hire annual
inspection services of the golf course management activity unless local
governmental time and expertise is availabfe.
D. Transportation and Parking Lot BMP's:
1. Prohibit/Relocate public/private snow storage areas from land adjac;ent to water features and install filtration systems at snow storage sites.
2. Require setback from water feature of at 6east 100' for parking lotx or a
drainage plan that prevents runoff into the water feature.
3. Discourage construction of new roads along water sources such as
creeks and river. Discourage widening of existing roads unless a
drainage plan can be developed that deflects drainage away from the
adjacent water feature.
. 4. With CDOT, Southern Pacific Railroad, C;ounty and towns, review
transportation practices to determine which ones contribute to non-
24
giounq soua~ce pollution and can be locally/regionally altered.
' - 6. Lobby CDOT for testing of alternative; more environmentally sound
practices on selected sections of road in Eagle County.
E. ~ndividual Sewage Disposal Sys4ern Adrninistration BMP's:
~
1. ,4ddress impacts of septic system impacts to ground and surface water
quality by:
*Increasing rninirnum size stanc?arc9 for eligible lots for septic to 5
acres and increase minimum standard for disgance from stream or
PIbeP t0 100 feet;
*Septic design engineers must prove factually ghat groundwatee
and adjacent surface water vvill not be impacted and be liable for
impacts;
*Encourage the logical eztension of sewer lines. Clarify
distances for required connection to existing sewer service lines
or thresholds for when a public sanitary sewer is required;
#Establish a well head protection program in the County Land
Use Regulations
2. Develop regulatory program for inspection and maintenance of
individual sewage disposal systems (septic systems).
F. Gravel Mining BMP's:
1. Implement specific gravel mining standards that include:.
#Limits on percentage of site disturbance
*iVo disturbance of-established wetland/riparian vegetation areas
or any other identified sensitive area
*Bufifers from river
*On-site detention
: #Limits on life span #,4cceptable levels of traffic ienpact and mitigation
#Reclamation plans to completely restore native vegetation (or
better) that include supplemental irrigation for plant establishment
. 2. Enforce wastewater discharge permits for gravel mining operations and
encourage citizen reporting of potential violations (see Public
Information and Education 3.3.2).
3. Encourage gravel retrieval along the Eagle River or tributary valleys in
areas where development that will require site disturbance As approved
or expected and acceptable. Gravel mining in tributary valleys is
discouraged if gravel resources are present along the Eagle River
Corridor. -
25
G. BMP's for Agricultural Uses on Public or Private Land:
1. Restrict grazing in areas with highly erc?sive soils such as public lands in
the Milk Creek, Ute Creek, Muddy Creek, Alkali Creek drainages.
2. Decisions as to limitations and manageiment of agricultural chemicals
should be based on preparation of carefully designed pest control and
nutrient management plans reflecting iritegrated approaches to pest
control and detailed soil testing and plant analyses.
3. Require fencing, herding and other means to prevent livestock frorn
concentrating in riparian areas. Do not locate livestock watering
facilities in the riparian area. Access to) riparian areas by livestock
should be limited, and should be designed to minimize water qualii:y
impacts.
4. Review impacts of agricultural practices on water quality in local areas
under USFS and BLM jurisdiction. Revi:se/develop standards for water
quality protection in USFS and BLM management documents.
H. BMP's for Logging on Public or Private Larids:
1. Work with the local Forest Service Rancjer District to encourage BE;st
Management Practices during timber harvesting to reduce potential for
erosion and improve public information process. Specific recommended
actions include:
*Review of current erosion control methods for maximum
effectiveness;
*Possible revision of those erosion control methods;
*Review of necessity for road building or other timbering
associated activities or practices that reduce the forest cover and
cause erosion; and
*Development of a public informiition process that includes
posting the timber sale with informative signs that describe the
action being taken and reasons why (i.e. bark beetle kill, etc.)
' and distribution of information to local media for public
information.
1. Recreation BMP's:
1. Keep constructed trails out of riparian areas, but if heavily used
anyway, provide a designated trail to concentrate impacfs.
2. Provide toilets and trash receptacles in zireas of high recreation use (e.g.
parking areas adjacent to streams, boat launch areas, high fishing iise
areas).
3. Develop and implement travel management restrictions on
public land off-road areas where erosive soils are present (USFS, BLIVI).
26
3.3.4 ISSUE: DRIiVKING WATER QUALITY PROTECTION
Good drinking water quality is a priority concern to communities in the watershed.
RECOiViiViEiVDED ACTION:
1. Wagershed and Wellhead Progecqion Programs
Fiefine wagershed protection prograrn outlined by this plan and develop a
wellhead protection ppograPxo to protect drinking water quality from pollution of •
the water. source.
2. Public Onforrnation Prograrn
Include Anformation on drinking water in the "State of the V1/ater" report that is
part of the Public Information and Education Program (3.3.2).
3.3.5 ISSUE: WATER QUALITY LIfVKED TO V1/,4TER QUANTITY
In=basin water quantity is limited, and further depletions will impact in-stream water
quality.
RECOiVifViEiVDED ACTIOfV:
1. Water Quantity
Refier to Chapter 2-Water Quantity for specific actions related to improving
water quantity in the watershed,
3.3.6 ISSUE: WATER AUGNiEIVTATIOIV PL,4NS DO NOT ALV1/AYS ADDRESS
STREAfVi FLOW NEEDS
Water augmentation plans are made with trades which remove water from the Eagle
river basin during times of low in-stream flows. During these times, dilution flows
are critical to meeting water quality standards.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. "Wet" Water Development Approval
Dedelopment approvals should be made on the condition that deliverable water exists which does not reduce instream flows during low flow periods
(July through September and January through iVlarch). Discussions with the
CWCB on water augmentation plans could help develop local criteria for
development approval. 27
EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED
~ yVATER QUALITY IMPACT
AREAS
. '1~ I
? i
~ WATERSHED BOUNDaRr
!
7/~~ II rli ~i , J%~ ~ ~
ISTORIC
FISH
"KILLT L E G E N D
.
STATE OF COIOFtADO
fdREST SERNCE j ~,f ~;f~ ~tF~~' .;w~y 1 " ~/~j, ` ;r% ~ii
BUREAU OF LM10 MANACEMENT
PRIVAIE LANO
7~/
MIATER DNERSIONS
WASTEWATER TRfATMENT PLANT
I/
//,,fi'i /j
ii COL.F COURSES
~ ' O ~ _ ~ ~~~.,a~i f/~/ ~ 'rf r ~i i /~J / i / /~i v ~r^ / ; •
ji~ NQ~10/ RNL
/
; UNBAN NON POINT 4YSTEN
A~ /%i %l , i„ ~ ~ ~1i'~ t ~
RIPARYW OISTURBMICE
r)$t~% O 41NING
WATERSHED BOUNDARY
ACRICULTURAL
~/~x.vi%' ? /7 j'~~ ~~i
RECREATION
NOTES:
n~
AREAS HIGHUGHTED ARE APPROXIMATIONS EAGLE COUNTY LINE ~
AND 00 NOT REPRESENT EXACT BOUNpARIES.
LEVELS OF IMPACT VARY.
Z~
~
~
. B
CHAPTER 4: MLDLIFE
- . /
4.1 GOALS
r
1. Determine and meet optimum in-stream flows in the Eagle Fiiver and its
tributaries.
2. iViaintain or increase amount of riparian area open space and riparian
vegetation on the river and its tributaries.
3. Improve water quality in the river by lowering amount of sediment load,
contaminants and pollutants reaching the river.
4. Improve solitude for wildlife during critical times of the year, particularly
along tributaries.
5. Maintain/improve the quality of aquatic habitat on the river and its
tributaries.
4.2 BACG(G~OUND
Ptablic Opinion
In a statistically valid survey done in 1993, Eagle County asked a question, "What
makes the quality of life so high in Eagle County?" One of the top reasons people
said that they enjoyed living in the area was because of the abundance and visibility
of wildlife. A majority of the wildlife in the Eagle Valley use, at least at some time .
of the year, the habitat associated with the Eagle River or one of its tributaries.
Eagle River Watepshed Wfldlife AYtributes
The Eagle River basin is a fairly unique river system. Of river systems in northern
industrialized nations less than 25% of the major river systems flow freely. The
Colorado River is the most affected system in North America. The Colorado's
waters have been manipulated. by damming and diverting and have caused "highly
fragmented " populations of species living in and around the river (Dynesius and
iVilsson, 1994). In-stream manipulations are not the only cause of fragmentation.
fVianipulations of the habitat surrounding the rivers also create impacts.
The area influenced by the high water table including the banks of the river and the
. adjacent vegetation are defined as riparian ecosystems. Riparian ecosystems
constitute one of the most limited (in terms of land area covered) yet species rich
ecosystems in Colorado. This ecosystem serves a variety of functions including
water storage, aquifer recharge and discharge, streambank protection, biological
28
filters, and as an area used for many recreationai activities. Of Colorado's .
approximately 1000 species of wildlife, over 500 of these utilize or occupy riparian
ecosystems ( Colorado Division of Wildlife, 1992 The riparian areas along the
Eagle River provide important wildlife habitats, migration corridors, breeding, nesting,
fawning, and calving areas.
Riparian ecosystems are one of the most important and sensitive of a11 habitat types.
Eagle County lands are comprised of 80.3% state and federal public lands and
19.7% private holdings ( Eagle County Master Plain, 1994 It is estimated that
90% of riparian ecosystems along the Eagle River mainstem are on privately owned
property. Habitat Loss or Degradation
In Colorado we lose 1.7 % of mule deer range peir year ( WalmoFet al, 1981), and in
Eagle County, estimates are that up to 40% of deE;r winter range has been lost.
Most of this lost habitat has been adjacent to the Eagle River. Developmenty
industry, agriculture, and recreation have all contrilbuted to the loss of riparian areas.
*Housing developments are often found directly adjacent to riparian areas.
These sites are sought after for aesthetics ahd tranquility. Also these low
lying areas are usually adjacent to transportation and utility corridors.
*Along with the development of property comes the developments of roads,
for every mile of Interstate built 45 acres of land are. used, for every mile of
rural highway 12 acres of land are used and for every rural mile of road built 7
acres of land are used (Walmo;et al, 1981
flndustry in the form of mining and manufacturing also have impacted ithe
Eagle River. The Eagle mine in Gilman has been and continues to be asource
of heavy metal discharge into the river. Superfund monies are being used to
c{ean up the site and rectify the problem of the discharges with some degree
of success. *Agriculture competes for the water in the Eagle River and the river's
tributaries. Agricultural water rights can at times severely deplete the river's
tributaries. tivestock also use riparian areas for feeding, resting; and as 'travel
lanes, thus, increasing the impacts to soil and vegetation ( Stoddart and Smith,
1955 1.
*Recreation impacts may be more subtle and less understood but inciude
littering, soil compaction, loss of vegetative c.over, site development,
disruption and harassment of wildlife.
29
Wa9dliffe Use Patterns
Some species of wildlife use the riparian area year round, these include mammals,
amphibians, reptiles, crustaceans, birds, invertebrates, and fish. Other wildlife may
use the area only seasonally for a variety of purposes such as migrating from their
summer/fall range to wintering areas, or for breeding and rearing their young, as the
Great Blue Herons do. Bald Eagles and many other raptors use the area for
wintering, roosting and hunting areas. Elk and deer usually calve and fawn within
400 feet of free flowing water usually on south facing slopes with a gentle aspect,
on the edge of an ecotone with a wide open field of view ( Thomas, J. W. et al.,
1982 In the Eagle Valley these areas are usually on or near the tributaries of the
Eagle River. Other wildlife that have been sighted in the riparian areas of the Eagle
River include Greater Sandhill Cranes, moose, White Pelicans, Trumpeter Swans,
Whooping Cranes, otter, beaver and mink. A list of wildlife using the riparian area is
available at Division of V1/ildlife offices ( Colorado Division of Wildlife, 1982
Fishery CharacterisYics
The Eagle -River is and has been a good fishery but is not considered a"great"
fishery. There are a number of reasons why the river does not excel in fish
productivity: •
#Historically and presently there are times of the year when the river is
running below minimum in-stream flows. This can cause a variety of
problems for a fishery, including increasing water temperatures, which in turn
stresses the fish, making them susceptible to diseases and parasites. During
the past few years the Eagle River has had fish die-offs (or "fish kills") during
the low water times, most typically in the during the summer. The cause of
the die-offs has been diagnosed as the disease furunculosis. The low flow
rates during the winter create a problem of not having over-wintering habitat
for the fish. The Eagle River has a limited number of deep pools where fish
can survive the winter.
*There is also a problem with sedimentation during the spring run-offs or after
a"gully washer." The sediment during the spring buries any eggs that may
have been laid thus inhibiting natural reproduction. The sediment also covers
potential spawning areas and many invertebrates thus restricting reproduction
and also decreasing food supplies. The drainages including Niilk, iViuddy,
Alkali and Ute creeks are the, main problem areas. The geological make-up of
these areas, with unstable sparsely vegetated soils, are the cause for the
majority of the sedimentation. The banks of the river in areas are without
vegetation and eroding, adding to the sedimentation problem.
30
*Pollution from heavy metals plays a part in poor fish productivity in the upper
Eagle River below Gilman. Runoff from golf courses, parking areas, roads, - '
adjacent lands also can greatly impact fish productivity and survival.
*Diversions and culverts also can impair a fishery by creating barriers to fish
movements and migrations.
The Eagle River has been stocked with Rainbow and Cutthroat trout at several
locations to supplement or replace natural reproduction of the fishery. Rainbow and
Brown trout are the two dominant trout species found in the river. Brook and
Cutthroat trout are also present as are several types of suckers, chubs, whitefish
and sculpin. Many of the privately owned ponds (e.g. gravel pits) next to the Eagle
are now stocked with a variety of species including 1arge and small mouth bass,
sunfish, perch, catfish, and northern pike. These other species may impact the long
term survivability of the trout. .
4.3 ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
The following issues that have been identified through the planning process are
listed in priority order, followed by discussion and rec:ommended alternative actions
to address these concerns.
Issues: In-Stream Flows Insufficient for Fishery/Riparian
Riparian Habitat Decreasing Due. to Human Development
Water Quality Impacts on Fishery
Wildlife Solitude During Critical Periods
Quality and Productivity af Aquatic Habitat
. 4.3.1 ISSUE: INSTREAM FLOWS INSUFFICIENT FOR FISHERY OR AQUATIC
HABITAT
tnstream flows fall below minimum levels at certain tiimes of the year. The minimum
flows may not be sufficient to. maintain the fishery or the riparian habitat.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Identify optimum in-stream flows and produce a management plan for meeting
the iarget amounts. Work with CWCB and CDOW to evaluate the local.
minimum stream flow calculations to determine, defensibility and adequacy
based on scientific principles. Determine if the minimum stream flow
timelines are appropriate or require adjustment to more accurately reflect the
natural hydrological cycle. As part of the management plan, identify major
and minor water users in the watershed and their diversions and consumptive
use.
31
2. Promote engineering solutions which increase the flexibility of a
' sharing/distributing water among various providers and provide water
augmentation during low flow water periods of the year.
3. Purchase water rights.
4. Implement a county wide conservaYion program for water use.
5. Do not allow development that does, not have adequate "wet" wa$er to meet
estimated demand and is dependent on sources that do not contribute °°wet -
water" to the Eagle River (i.e. Green Mountain Reservoir).
6. Request that CWCB, CDOW and CDVVR p(ace additionai gauges on ali streams
and the river to determine in-stream flows and offer town and County staff
assistance with the project and funding requests.
(see also 'Chapter 2 - Water Quality)
4.3.2 ISSUE: RIPARIAiV HABITAT DECREASIiVG
Riparian habitat is decreasing due to developmental, agricultural, industrial, and -
recreational uses.
RECOMNiENDED ACTIOiVS:
1. Trade lands in order to obtain riparian areas.
2. Increase and require for all land uses a stream side setback or "buffier zorae"
where the natural vegetation and soil must remain intact to fully protect
riparian habitat for all: Enhancement of native or natural vegetation may
occur, particularly in areas where historical use has impacted the riparian
vegetation (see also Chapter 6- Land Use re: setbacks).
3. For recreation uses, develop access, ingress, and egress points through the
riparian habitat to concentrate impacts and then require users to utilize only
these points (see Chapter 5- Recreation re: access).
4. Fence apeas where vegetation is disturbed by livestock or wildlife to promote
restoration. Install "wildlife-friendlyrr fences are 40" to 42" high with a 12'
kickspace to avoid entrapping wildlife in these areas.
5. Require any type of development to maintain ripapian an 6ts natural condi$ion
and cluster the development away from the riparian areas.
6. Determine potential project locations and implement physical stream
enhancement projects ( vegetative plantings with native species, bank
32
stabilization, erosion controls, stream channel modifications, etc. ) as joirit
projects between CDOW, Corps of Engineers, Towns, Eagle County and - others.
7. Develop a public information program to inforrn citizens of activities which
impact the riparian habitat and how these activities can be modified to lessen
or remove the impacts.
8. Develop standards in order to require "wildlife--friendly" drainage and
transportation improvements for river and creek valleys. The standards should
include an inventory of existing problem facilities: For example, culverts can
become barriers to fish passage and bridges constructed without filling tfiat
span the natural width of the stream should bf; used.
9. Conduct an inventory of all riparian, wetland and floodplain zones of the Eagle
River and tributaries to determine habitat type and variety, condition and
productivity, need for r.evegetation and/or stabilization. First priority would be
the main stem and then the major tributaries facing most development
pressure. Include a standard for revegetation and stabilization in the study.
. 10. Require that all riparian/wetlands be protected and allow no mitigation
• because mitigation does not compensate for the loss of established habitat.
The following exception may be allowed: Require mitigation of the impac;t
before any construction starts i.e. create same! acreage of fuily functioning
wetlands before disturbing the existing wetlands. Working wetlands would
have the same or better wildlife, filtering values, etc. as the current wetlands.
This same technique can possibly be employeci with other types of species
habitat (deer, elk, etc.) if it is same or better type of habitat. Mitigation
should occur on-site or as close as possible to the disturbed area to actually
offset the impact 1e.g. wetlands degradation on Lake Creek is not mitigated by
providing a wetland at Camp Halel. (see aiso C:hapter 6- Land Use re:
sensitive lands)
11. In specific cases where mitigation is found to acceptable, mitigation trust
funds based on a shared, local formula should be pursued. Funds received
should accurately reflect the costs to mitigate the habitat disturbance.
~
12. If platting and/or development is proposed, require that wildlife corridors be
maintained as open space.
4.3.3 ISSUE: -WATER QUALITY IMPACTS FISH PRODUCTION:
Water quality continues to be a factor in fish product.ion and survival with
contaminants coming from a variety of sources.
33
RECOMMEIVDED ACTIOiVS: . 1. Develop and implement local policies and regulations to congro9 urban run-offf
and prevent drainage into river, streams and riparian areas.
2. Continue clean up of the Eagle enine in GilPnan to remove that source of heavy
metal contamination.
3. Monitor the river for pollutants and contaminants.
4. Piant natade vegetation along the river and in the adjacent uplands to serve as
a natural biological filter and sediment trap.
5. Provide an area where Eagle Valley residents can durnp household aoxec mater6als (motor oils, paints, etc.).
6. Review existing programs, revise as necessary and implement a program to
control sedirnent Bn the Milk, Muddy, Q.Dte and AlEcali Creek drainages tfiat
includes:
A. Develop sediment catch basins or other sediment catching
structures; and
B. Establish vegetation, where topography and soil substrate allow, for
greater soil stability and for a natural sediment filtering process; and
C. Restrict grazing to levels that serve to improve soil stability through
plan establishment, and
D. Restrict ofif-road vehicle use to lessen soil disturbance.
. 4.3.4 ISSUE: WILDLIFE SOLITUDE DURING CRITICAL PERIODS IMPACTED
V1/ildlife's solitude is being disturbed during critical periods of the year such as
breeding, calving and fawning, nesting, migration, and while winter ranging.
Solitude during the summer is also disturbed by human activities (i.e. Homestake
Lake use).
RECOiViMENDED ACTIOfVS:
1. Restrict or prohibit human use in cPitical habitaYs during critical times of the
year ( e.g. seasonal closures on areas where elk are known to calve, when
Sage grouse are strutting, etc.). CDOW and USFW can advise local regulators
of private land and regional managers of public lands about areas of concern.
The following actions can be implemented through public education via the
media and signing, physical closures (locked gates, barriers, etc.), and
monitoring by volunteers or wildlife staff. Actions should include:
A. Restrict daily or hourly use of critical areas.
34
B. Confine human use to a prescribed area during these critical time
periods.
C. Restrict access to foot only or vehicle only, depending on area.
D. Monitor sites to determine if restrictions are negating the impacts of
human activities.
2. Provide a"buffer zone " between human land development, recreation, etc.
and wildlife activities. Buffer zones can be a vegetative barrier between
wildlife and humans or in some cases simply 143aving enough distance between
humans and wildlife.. Viewing af wildlife should be done from the perimeter of
the buffer zone. This can be implemented by local governments as setbacks
. or open space and by federal agencies through use restrictions and education
(see also 4.3.2.2. and Chapter 6- Land Use re:setbacks).
3. Designate sites for wildlife watching in order to concentrate and control
• impacts.
4.3.5 ISSUE: MAINTAIN QUALITY AND PRODUCTI'VITY OF AQUATIC HABIT,4T
To try to maintain the quality of the fishing experienc;e on the Eagle River and
increase the productivity of the fishery.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Determine and maintain optimum instream flovvs in the river on a year round
basis.
2. Habitat improvements to the river such as bank stabilization with willow or .
other native vegetation will provide cover, thermal protection and source of
food to the fishery. Placement of structures or large rock for cover and hiding
may be bene:tcial assuming the armoring of the riverbed is not disturbed.
Placement -of gravel beds for spawning, enginE:ering culverts or other diversion
structures to allow fish movements will all be beneficial. Projects could be
jointly implemented by CDOW, County and local fishing organizations.
3. If fishing use of the Eagle River watershed continues to increase and the
fishery cannot support use levels, implement restrictions on fishing use and
increased bag limits to maintain a healthy aquatic ecosystem.
4. Evaluate impacts of fish shocking techniques used on local fish populations.
35
. , I
R86W R85W R84W R83W R82W R81 W R80W R79W
a . I
N ~ EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED i
~ WILDLIFE HABITAT
~
6RAPHIC lCA18 I
I~r~rf
WATERSHEO BOUNDARY ,
, .
V) I
! I
, -j
LEGEND
/ t ' i~;~ ~i iiil , i /
fTAi[ Or OOl01tM0
7 , . / / ij ~ i~ / ii/. . ~'i?i~/ / , ' ~ ~ ~ .
?acst fawec
N ~j~i/~ OMI[MI Of LNW 91w11G[Y[Mi
to MCN1R tN0
% • % „ ';:i', • ACM M[IIOi IIOOMEIM
MlD fAOtL IIOW 1Rf
YDYdIM RVTMt (CGrRM
N ~ MMIIM ~MM~~i (Iqi ML NCti.YMR)
J ~
W.E,,
. ~c_
/r } • NFPRESENTS MAAkiTY pf RIP- 1M31iAi (Iqf M1 IN[LUSIYC) .
/
SOUt[E- [OLORA00 DIVISIOM Of vILDLIi'[
WATERSHED BOUNOARY N
N
°D x s
f--
EAGLE COUNTY LiNE ~
I / ~ ,
. . ~
s
~
CHAPTER 5: RECREATION
•
5.1 GOALS
1. To preserve and improve the high quality of recreational opportunities, such as
fishing and boating, which exist along the Eagle River and its tributaries.
2. To implement good management practices that are practical, economically
feasible, and fair to reduce the real or perceived overcrowding and impact of
recreation within the watershed.
3. Actively pursue access options, particularly in high use areas as identified for
segment specific areas. Develop access on public lands, and improve current
access sites where necessary, while respecting the private landowner's rights.
4. Protect the Eagle River and its tributaries so people can continue to catch fish
of "respectable" size well into the future.
5.2 ~~CKGf~OUND
The Eagle River and its tributaries support a wide range of recreational opportunities
and the number of people taking advantage of these opportunities increases
dramatically each year. The Eagle River watershed has become a premier year round
resort area, as well as an increasingly desirable place to live for those who enjoy the
recreational amenities.
Recpeational ActiviYies
Fishing, rafting, and kayaking are the most popular activities on the river itself, but
many other activities along the river and its tributaries have been identified, including
hiking, biking , wildlife watching, camping, hunting, cross country and dovvnhill
skiing, golf, rock climbing, sledding, snowmobiling, picnicking, jeeping, horseback
riding, and berry picking. Increasing pressure has already begun to show, both
physically on the river itself, and in the expressions of concern from the people who
live and visit the area.
' Excamp9e off Use Stagistics
The BLfVi monitors river floater user days each year between iViinturn and Gypsum,
and the statistics below help illustrate one aspect of the tremendous recreation
growth on the Eagle River. The figures below include fishing and rafting outfitters
and clearly show that recreation use of the Eagle River has increased drarnaticaBBy.
36
Year SRP# Use (commercial) Use rivate Total Use
1988 7 2,945 440 3,385
1989 10 3,453 520 3,973
1990 11 7,951 1,190 9,131
1991 13 11,388 1,710 13,098
1992 14 16,685 . 1,310 10,044
1993 19 15,255 2,290 17,545
1994 25 to be updated for final draft
SRP# BLM Special Recreation Permit (fishing and rafting outfitters)
Economic Impacts of Eagle River Watershed Recreation
The economic impact of this use in the community can be estimated by a 1991
survey done by the Colorado River Outfitters Association (CROA). The study
estimates $168 was spent on average for every person per raft day. This number
includes the secondary economic impact of rafting siuch as lodging, transportataon,
clothing, and dining costs. Using the above figures, this means approximately
$1,300,000 spent by people rafting on the Eagle River in 1991 (and the season only
lasts for approximately 6 weeks!). Similarly, the DOW estimated sportsman
expenditures on fishing in 1991 state wide to be $920,411,800...and one can
assume that a significant portion of this must have been spent in Eagle County.
5.3 ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
The following issues that have been identified throuilh the planning process are
listed in pr.iority order, followed by discussion and recommended alternative actions
to address these concerns.
Issues: Carrying Capacity/Limits of Acceptable Change
Quality of Fishing Experience
Access
Site Specific Recommendations
5.3.1 ISSUE: CARRYING CAPACITY
One of the primary issues facing the Eagle River wa-tershed is overcrowding. L7uring
the public participation process for this plan, most people indicated that they felt the
37
river is not too crowded yet, but has the potential in the future, and with sound
' • management we can avoid the types of problems facing other heavily used rivers in
Colorado. iVlany people were concerned about "over-regulation" of recreation.
Carrying capacity is defined as "the number (amount) and type of use an area can
accommodate without altering either the environment or the user's experience
beyond a degree of change deemed acceptable by the management objective.°"
To a large degree, the feeling and perception of solitude is often an essential aspect
of a quality recreational experience. This is particularly true for fishing, hiking,
wildlife viewing, rafting, and kayaking. . The .Eagle River Corridor from fVlinturn to Gypsum is becoming increasingly urban, particularly in the Vail-Avon-Edwards area. .
This makes the sense of solitude and the perception of overcrowding worse.
The areas which are still rural in nature also tend to be largely private, with access
granted by permission only. As a result, the few areas that are on public lands to
tend to be overused. The DOV1/ leases some significant tracts for fishing access,
however there i's no guarantee that these areas will remain available in the future as
some of the leases are not in perpetuity.
Conflicts between recreational uses along the river are minimal at this time,
especially since most rafting and kayaking occurs in the early summer when the river
is too high and muddy for good fishing. Inevitably, though, as use by all recreational
activities increases, so does the potential for conflicts.
RECOfVifViENDED ACTIONS:
1. DeterPnine Carrying Capacity
Determining the "carrying-capacity" of the river is essential before any major
management decisions are made, especially regulating recreation to reduce
overcrowding. A cooperative effort between the BLNi, USFS, DOW, and
Eagle County needs to study the current situation by monitoring use levels by
all recreational users, determine, what visitor preferences are, and establish
what impacts are occurring (photos would be useful). These agencies need to
establish the carrying capacity or "limits of acceptable change" appropriate for
the watershed by addressing the physical, ecological, and social capacities of
the river and the existing facilities. The economic impact of enforcing these
limits must be carefully considered making a determination. See the following
references for a description of the. methods commonly used to make these
determinations: Appendix from the Yampa Plan--Carrying Capacity and USFS
Manual for Establishing Limits of Acceptable Change. 1lVith prudent planning,
we hope to avoid the problems facing other popular rivers without having 40
implement too many "restrictions." The creation of an interagency monitoring
committee is necessary to accurately gauge recreation growth and recognize
problems as they arise.
38
2. Improve Existing Access and Create New AccEiss
Improve existing public access points and create new ones where appropriate .
to help disperse users along the river. ImprovE;d and maintained facilities will
help reduce the impression of overcrowding by reducing litter, reducing the
amount of time that large groups are at a particular access points, and
improve the overall recreation experience. (seis Issues: Access).
3. Mapping
Create a detailed recreation map to address many of the issues regarding
recreational opportunities by providing information on the following topics:
* Access
* Navigation assistance and hazard ideintification,
* Explanation of river ethics
* Encourage environmental protection t:hrough education * Disperse users
* Protect private land, reduce trespass violations
The map should be a cooperative effort between the agencies managing the
• land and those promoting tourism, and distributed free or for a small fee at
information booths, hotels, shops, and access facilities.
4. Review Restrictions
Once the carrying capacity or limits of acceptable change have been
established, restriction on commercial operaticins may have to be implemented
by the BLM and USFS. Real restriction of commercial outfitters (ie: boating
ana fishing) would involve a change in jur.isdiction along the river, as commercial outfitters do not need to be permitted by these agencies if they
only use -private land. Other rivers in the stato (the Arkansas) have become a
State Park, and then can be truly regulated. F'rivate individuals could also be
permitted, or some kind of "fee for use" implemented. Regulation of this type
is extreme and should be carefully considered.
5. Special Events
Organize local raft companies and kayakers to establish a kayak course and
"river festival" to increase awareness and appireciation of the Eagle River and
its tributaries.
39
5.3.2 ISSUE: QUALITY OF FISHIiVG EXPERIEiVCE Fishing on the Eagle River and its tributaries has seen dramatic growth over the past
few years. The style of fishing is also changing as fly fishing grows in popularity,
and with it, the increased use of guides and commercial outfitters. The general
growth and accompanying development in Eagle County along the river corridor has
also had an impact on the quality of fishing. As more land is being removed from
recreational uses, it limits access and degrades the overall experience. Conflicts
between commercial guides and individuals are becoming increasingly common, as
are other problems involving fishing style (bait vs. fly fishing), bag limits and
enforcement, catch and release fishing and the quality of the aquatic habitat.
It is important to note, that the DOW considers the Eagle River to be only "good"
fishing, not "great." (See Chapter 4-Vl/ildlife) For this reason some of the management strategies used on "Gold Mledal" fisheries are not appropriate in this
area, with the exception of Gore Creek between Red Sandstone and the Eagle River.
Another important consideration is. the way people fish. The DOV1/ found in a survey
of 400 fisherman statewide, 50% use a c.ombination of flies, lures and bait, 25%
use bait only, 14% use flies and lures only, and only 13% use flies only. AIthough
these numbers are probably different in Eagle County because of local interest and
clientele utilizing guide service, it is safe to assume that a significant number of
fishermen along the Eagle and its tributaries enjoy fishing with bait and lures, as well
as flies.
RECOMfViEiVDED ACTIONS:
1. Determine Condition of Fishery
As stated above in "Carrying Capacity," a detailed study off the exact
condition of 4he gishery and lirnits of acceptable change Pnusg be done to
assist management in making sound decisions. After threshold limits of fish
must are set, efforts to maintain fishing habitat can be implemented by
recommended actions listed in the Water Quality, Quantity, Wildlife, and Land
Use chapters.
2. Irnprove and Create Access
Spread out the fishing pressure with better access to improve the quality of
the fishing experience along the corridor. Increase access through easements
and teases. Better education with signs and the recreation map will also
improve the pressure situation.
3. Fishing Designations
Designate portions of the Eagle River, tributaries, and lakes as "fly fishirag--
catch and pelease only", while allowing bait and spin fishing in other areas.
40
Again, the detailed recreation map will better disperse people to areas suited
to their fishing style. Both Gore Creek from Red Sandstone creek to the - -
confluence with the Eagle River and the new A,rrowhead DOW lease currently
have this designation.
4. The DOW should improve enforcement of bag limits and regulations. Also
possibly increase the existing bag limit.
5. A commercial guide limitation should be implernented if deemed necessary to
protect the quality of the fishery and fishing experience.
5.3.3 ISSUE: ACCESS
Access to the Eagle River and its tributaries for recreation use is being e(iminated or
impaired by development of the adjacent land. Most of the land along the Eagle
River Corridor is privately owned (55% between Edwards and Dotsero, and
approximately 50% between Tennessee Pass and Minturn).
As recreational use of the river and its tributaries grows, increased and improved
access will be needed. The ERMP advocates well planned access points to alleviate
pressure on the few well known and heavily used sites while also being sensitive to
the riparian and aquatic environment and to the needs and rights of the adjacent
private land owners.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. River Access Improvement Guidelines
This action recommends improvement guidelines for both existing and new,
proposed access sites.
A. Preserve site character, using environmentally sensitive site selection
and facility construction processes. WFiile disp.ersion of access will
ease crowding, within the access point:; themselves every effort should
be made to concentrate and mitigate imipacts. The riparian zone must
be preserved using guidelines outlined in Chapter 4- Wildlife and
Chapter 6- Land Use. Stabilize streambanks wherever possible with
structures or re-vegetation.
B. Site selection and facilities should be dE;signed for access by the
physically challenged wherever possible. (See Yampa Valley Recreation
Plan-Barrier Free Requirements referenced).
C. Provide adequate road surfacing and parking, at major river access
points.
41
D. Provide restroom facilities at major river access points. Consider the
' • use of composting/desiccating toilets. Maintain all facilities to meet
health and safety standards.
E. Reenove existing navigation hazards, such as irrigation diversion
structures and debris to insure safe and passable boat chutes.
Developers and governmental agencies must be required to consult writh
whitewater specialists before building or allowing structures in, under,
or over the river.
F. The pecreation rnap will help disperse use along the river and help direct
users to areas which can tolerate higher levels of use, reduce trespass,
and ensure use of p.roper access points.
G. Vmproded signing will help reduce trespass and confusion.
H. Implement and enforce seasonal closure of areas, particularly on the
tributaries, which are environmentally sensitive. This includes areas of
wildlife calving, spawning, erosion problems and trail or land restoration
(see Chapter 6-Wildlife).
1. Set camp sites back frorri the rivep a minimum of 100', with 150'
setback the optimal goal. Camping should only be allowed at
designaged sites along the Eagle River iViainstem, and sites should be
carefully monitored by the USFS and BLiVi and closed for
repair/revegetation as necessary.
J. All access points to the Eagle River and the tributaries should be
rrionitored by agencies managing them to see that their "carrying
capacities" are not being exceeded, and seek alternative or
modifications as they become overused.
K. Guidelines for the management of sites should be $ollowed by aIB
• managing entities; federal, state and local.
L. Support implementation of local trails plans, particularly for segments
that provide access to the river or tributaries.
2. Land Developeneng Provides/Protects Access
Redise town and county land use regulation, policy and planning documengs,
and work programs to implement the access actions listed below.
A. Additional access along the Eagle River and tributaries should be
42
pursued in close proximity to population centers or in areas where
public access will not impact sensitive or riparian areas. The map - accompanying this section details some of the existing easements and
public lands that are available to the putilic as access points and
indicates that access is available but not: convenient or encouraged, or
in the areas where most in demand. Foi, example, the stretch of river
that features the most concentrated poriulation in the watershed, that
between Vail and Minturn and Avon, ha;s the least amount of public
land or access easements along the. river.
. B. Through development of remaining parcels adjacent to the river, and
tributaries, request easements for public access. The minimum wicith
of an easement request should be 25' paralleling the river, at least on
one side, wherever possible, with the exception of sensitive areas and
other areas identified through mapping as inappropriate for unlimited
public use access. Soft surface footpaths (no bicycles) should be
required as part of development proposzils to direct the impacts of foot
traffic. Connecting access should be provided to the nearest public
roadway. Easements should allow for tiravel on dry ground as opposed
to an easement that lays entirely in the river or tributary.
C. Enforce protection of the riparian zone, wetlands floodplain, or 75'
setback (see Chapter 4 and 6-Wildlife and Land Use), whichever
applies, with the intent of establishing ai greenbelt along the length of
the Eagle River and its tributaries.
5.3.4 ISSUE:SPECIFIC ACCESS SITES NEED TO BE IMPROVED, DEVELOPED OR
PROTECTED
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Develop or Improve Access
All of the following sites-or areas currently provide recreation opportunities
which should be protected or improved in the future following the civer site
management guidelines stated above. The use in these areas must be
monitored to manage them properly. The following recommendations are
listed in order of priority for A. Development cif New Sites (some may inc;lude
access now but are not focused on providing access to the water feature);
and B. Implementation of Improvements.to Existing Access Sites:
A. Development of New Sites: B. Improvement of Existing Sites:
1. Dowd Chute 1. ArrowheafJ Park and Easements
2. Wolcott Bridge 2. BLM Campground at Wolcott
43
3. Gilman Gorge 3. Lake Creek Apartments and Squaw ' 4. Eagle River Parks Squaw Creek confluence
5. Beaver Creek 4. Town of Eagle
6. Lake Creek/Squaw Creek 5. Gypsum Ponds State VVildlife Area
7. Ute, Alk, fViilk Creeks 6. DOW Fishing Lease & Red Canyon
8. Brush Creek/Gypsum Creek 7. Gore Creek-Ford Park
8. BLNi Access Edwards to Dotsero
9. Edwards ,4rea and Easements
10. Avon ,4rea Easements
11. Gypsum Area Easements 12. Other tributaries
DE@lELOP NEW ACCESS SITES:
1 . Dowc9 Chute
The whitewater between Minturn and Eagle Vial is becoming very popular for
rafting and kayaking. There are currently no adequate facilities to handle this
use, which will increase dramatically in the future. The USFS is currently
improving the boating access across from iVieadow iViountain and is
encouraged to follow all guidelines listed above (see River Site Management).
One of the current takeout points is at the entrance to the River Run Condos -
available for public use because it is on State Land Board land and is under a
DOV1/ lease. This site is inadequate for heavy raft and kayak use, having very
little parking, no board ramp or rostrum facilities. This area is the primary
takeout for boaters in Dowd Chute, as well as a principal put-in place for
boaters for the less challenging downstream stretch through Eagle-Vail and
Avon. An adequate access facility is essential in this area. Possible sites for
developed boat access points are the State Department of Transportation land
in Eagle-Vail, the DOW leased tand near River Run, under the I-70 bridge just
past Eagle-Vail, and the US West Building at Stone Creek. There is also
access to the river in Avon on Vail Associates land on the southwest side of
"Bob" the Bridge. There is a road to the river, but no restroom or trash
disposal facilities. It is also on private land with no guarantee of continued
access availability in the future, therefore a developed site in the Avon area is
also desirable. Funding for these projects could be shared by the USFS,
DOV1/, Eagle County, commercial outfitters and town governments.
2. Wolcott Bridge
This is another important access point to the Eagle River on BLNi land for
boating and fishing, above the Trestle Rapids. It is also a dangerous place,
with access being squeezed between the river and Highway 6 across from the
V1/olcott Store. The BLM is looking into acquiring the current Colorado
Department of Transportation site near the railroad trestle west of Wotcott.
They hope to develop this site -after the Department of Transportation moves
. 44
out. The rest of the land in this area is privately owned, so this would be a
good site to purchase land or acquire easemen-t rights. -
3. Gifman Gorge
No public access currently exists in this area. 'The Gilman Gorge has the
potential for providing a number of recreationall opportunities such as
, advanced rafting and kayaking, rock climbing, -Fishing, hiking, picnicking and
historic sites. Many public comments have concentrative on this area, as
people know of the recreation value and have had to trespass to use this area.
Eagle County and the USFS should pursue acqijiring access in and out of the
Gilman Gorge for both land and on-water use from the private land owners
(primarily the railroad and the mines). The optimal access points would be
somewhere around both the Red Cliff Bridge arid Tigiwon Road. Continued
efforts to clean up the river in this area should be monitored and encouraged.
4. Eagle River Parks near Community Centers
Identify locations for parks established adjacent to the river within each
population center. Potential sites include Edwards (possibly the Brett Ranch
and or State Rest Area), Vail, Minturn (Bolts Lzike and/or Southern Pacific rail
• yard downtown), Avon, Eagle-Vail, Wolcott, Eagle County Fairgrounds,
Gypsum, and Dotsero at the confluence with the Colorado River, Trail
networks proposed by the Eagle County Trail F'lan could link these parks
together by non-motorized routes.
5. Beaver Creek
The lower section of Beaver Creek is highly developed and recreation
opportunities are primarily golf, hiking and biking. It is a high profile area, like Vail, and receives extensive recreational use. 'The upper part of Beaver Creek
extends into the Holy Cross Wilderness area hijs potential for many
recreational opportunities. Public access to this major tributary needs to be
protected and possibly expanded.
6. Lake Creek and Squaw Creek
Both of these tributaries flow through a considerable amount of private
property.which is being developed at this time. They are also valuable
recreation corridors for many people for hiking,, biking and fishing and should
be protected for continued public recreation uses wherever possible through
development or other means.
45
. ,
7. Uge, AIlcali, Muddy and Milk Greeks
These tributaries flow into the river from the north near VVolcott and the land
along them is a mix of private ranches, large acreage home sites, BLM and
USFS property. The upper reaches of these tributaries are important areas for
camping, hiking, hunting and wildlife watching. The headwaters of Milk and
Alkali Creeks are within a BLM V1/ilderness Study Area vvhich encompasses
Castle Peak. There are numerous camp sites on the BLM and USFS
properties, however none are developed campground areas.
S. Braesh Creek anc8 Gypsurvi Creek Both of these major tributaries lie in land that is still largely rural and
agricultural in nature and provide considerable recreational opportunities. The
headwaters of both creeks lie in USFS land, while the lower stretches are
largely private. The Sylvan Lake State Recreation ,4rea is on V1/est Brush
south of Eagle. Fishing, hiking, biking, horseback riding, wildlife watching,
camping and hunting are important.in these areas and draw a considerable
number of people from outside Eagle County for these activities. These are
also areas in which recreational opportunities could come under considerable
jeopardy by plans for development. They are the last major tributaries of the
Eagle River which still have a pre-resort economy character and any
development should take into consideration the potential effects on current
recreational activities in balance with those that might be gained.
IMPff30VE IEX9STBNG ACCESS S6TES:
9. Arrowhead Parlc and Easements-
iViany people would like to see some sort of access to the stretch of river
along the Arrowhead at Vail development. A public access easement exists
along the Eagle River through the Arrowhead development and is accessed via
the "public park" at the west end of the development but is not well known.
Arrowhead is planning to designate this section of river "fly fishing only."
Access in this area should be monitored to prevent overuse, and follow the
guidelines established above (see River Site Management). Boating access
features would be desirable.
2. l8fl.M Campground in Wolcott
This site is west of V1/olcott and has been recently improved by the BLM,
providing a gravel parking area and restroom facilities. The site provides both
takeout and put in access for boaters and access off the highway for fishing
both on BLM and Denver V1/ater Board land to the east. It is also a favorite
site for rock climbers, as is the railroad trestle area to the east. (the trestle
area is however on private land). Because it is already developed, it should be
46
listed on the recreation map as a majar recreation point, and monitored and
improved as use increased. More camping sitE:s between the road and the - -
river.
3. Lake Creek Apartments and the Squaw Creek !Parcel
Access along this considerable stretch of river is open to the public at this
time and is important for many recreational ac-tivities. Public access was
granted along the river as part of Lake Creek Apartments development. A
bike path has been constructed separate from but parallel to the river for the
length of the project. The Squaw Creek Waste Water Treatment plant
. provides a principal put in and take out point for boaters, and with the DOW
acquisition of the Squaw Creek Parcel lease approximately one and a h:alf
miles of river has been opened to the public for fishing and other recreational
activities. The State Land Board owns the land downstream from the
Treatment plant and the continuation of the DOW lease is by no means
certain. Eagle County has expressed an interest in purchasing this land for
recreation and open space purposes and is trying to find funding for this
purchase. The Squaw Creek stretch of water would be a good candiaate for
catch and release or fly fishing only status. Any improved/acquired :4ccess in
this area is very desirable.
4. Eagle Boating access to the river exists at Chamber:> Park and at the EagIE County
Fairgrounds. Both of these sites provide parking, restroom and trash disposal
facilities which are adequate at this time, but should be carefully monitored.
Access for fishing and other activities exists ait both sites and for about a mile
downstream from the Fairgrounds on the north side o# the river. Float trips .
for both fishing and for drifting along a relatively undeveloped stretch of the
river can be attractive from this point. Throucjh the current effort to master
plan the Eagle County Fairgrounds, fishing, w;3lking, and scenic viewing
should be incorporated into the plan. Public input indicates that this area has
tremendous potential, particularly in regard to the river access and scenery.
An access easement along the river in east EEigle was recently obtained
through development of the Eagle Villas apartment project. The project aIso
includes a public park on the river. A soft focitpath may be warranted along
the waterline to concentrate impacts.
5. Gypsum Ponds State Wildlife Area
This is an important piece of the river for fishing , hunting and other recreation
and.wildlife activities. It is owned and maintained by the Divisiors :~f Wildlife.
Some public comments have indicated a desire for a boat takeout, and pijt-in
site here. Funding from concession/outfitter -fees for the wildlife area could be
used to implement rhat suggestion.
47
6. DOW fishing lease east of Eagle and BLM land in Red Canyon
This lease runs for approximately six miles along the north side of the river.
People moving to fish south of the-river centerline are trespassing on the
Diamond S Ranch. fVumerous pullouts exist along Highway 6 throughout this
stretch. There are no improved areas, however, for parking or restroom and
trash disposal facilities, but they should be considered. There is some private
land which breaks up this stretch at about the mid-point and east of the rock
quarry. This is another area where development could jeopardize access to
the river in the future and easement should be encouraged.
7. Gore Creek-Ford Park
During the citizen participation process, there was a comment that it would be
nice to provide kayak put in and takeout facilities at Ford Park. Niost kayakers
gain access-to Gore Creek at the East Vail exit, and take out downstream,
generally where any bridge crosses the stream, but a facility in this area
should be considered if funds become available.
8. ~LM access sites between Edwards and Dotsero
Sites that should be monitored and improved if necessary to handle increased
use, as recommended above, include Bellyache, the Booco Cabin Site,
Community Site, Horse Pasture, Gypsum and Lava Flow. Day use only should
be allowed at all BLiVi sites except Gypsum and Wolcott, where overnight
camping is acceptable. No camping should be allowed in Red Canyon on the
BLfVi land on the south bank of the river.
S. Edwards ,4rea and Easements
A 15' public access easements was granted through Old Edwards Estates on
the north side of the river. Public parking does not exist except for streets in
the subdivision and this easement involves being off of the bank and in the
water most of the season. Not well known and travels through private lots.
The Edwards State Highway Rest Area has potential for improved river
access.
10. Avon Area and Easements
A 50' public access easement was granted through River Forge development
west of Avon. It is a relatively short section of river and a relatively unknown
easement but available to the public. See Dowd Chute for boat take-out/put
in recommendations.
11. Gypsum Area Easemen4s
48
a
A public access easement is granted along the north bank of the river through
the length of the Eagle Estates subdivision. Generally 20' wide but travels • '
through private lots where access sometimes inhibited. Informal access
through Wallboard plant property to CDOW Gypsum Ponds.
12. Other Tributaries
Other tributaries where access and environment are possibly threatened t:hat
were identified in the public process and shoulld be studied include: Eby, Salt,
Bruce, McCoy and Buck Creeks (A trailhead recently installed .
49
PUBUC USE ACCESS EASEMENT OR LEASES ON PRIVATE LAND TOWN/COUNTY/STATE ACCESS ,
1. Eagle County Fairgrounds
1. Eagle River Estates permanent easement 2. Town of Eagle Chambers Park
2. Eagle Villas Apartments permanent easement 3. State land Board Eagle RiveNSquaw Crec K confluence (mgmt.by CDOW)
3. Red Mtn. Ranch permanent and temporary easements 4. CDOT Edwards Rest Area
4. Eagle Springs Golf Course limited easement 5. Town of Avon Bob Bridge
5. Lake Creek Apartments permanent easement 6. CDOT I-70 bridge over Eagle River
6. Old Edwards Estates permanent easement 7. State Land Board Dowd Junction lmgmt.,;y CDOW)
7. The Reserve permanent trail easement near river 8. Town of Vail Ford Park
8. Arrowhead permanent easement 9. Town of Mintum Eagle River Park (actually are 2)
9. Beaver Creek permanent trail easement along river
10.River Forge permanent easement R 84 W R 83 W R 82 W R 81 W ~
R80W R)9W
N
n
r ~
i
EAGLE RIVER
WATERSHED BOUNDARY
WATERSHED
~
RECREATION
~
io
~•:i ~ i ~ i l"~:~, 'l,~/'' ~ /i/ ~ ' ~ , i ii.:. /~i 6i
5 /
LE G E N D
n ~
si•R v eaawo
1011[fT xRMR
//1
i RIKMI d IAND WIM~~flli
10 " ~ . i o/~^?/~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i ~ i / 1r ~ ~ ~ /iir ~i ~f //iii i ~~~3~~ r ~ i ~ ~^n"~ /Rw1R IAND
~"i ~i' .i or r?/~ i~~ ~ i
~ rs nMweo
~
~ wr rra~ Aaas
~ ? iir p . ~r i r, j Y f i i O .y.i i~r ~~i
5b~ r i / P//" I s? ii i
0ft IM~flt ~OCI!
30.
N
J~i/ /'I~~O~ /i~ Y .~%/9~~" /ii / ?J / 1/,
wo. n ~ .a[s
wo
WATERSHED BOUNQARY
a _ ~y AONM MM N[WwG r/IIO~R1~O~r
(ftt nm *aq
BLM RIVER ACCESS CDOW RIVER ACCESS
1."Lava Flow' access Gypsum Pwnds State Wildlife Area
2."Horse Pasture" access ~q ` " 1~~'~,~,;
3. General "community" access US FOREST SVC. RIVER ACCESS 4: B L M c a m p g r o u n d w e s t o f G y p s u m 1. " D o w d C h u t e" l a u n c h s i t e f J 4 C L E C O U N tt U N E
5. "Dead Cow Rapid" access 2. Gore Creek access '
6. "R8d Canyoh/Borrow Pit" access 3. Champion Whitewater Kayak course
7. BLM camppround west of Wolcott 4. Rock ciimbing sites in Gilman Gorge
A"Annrn" arrnee F(;ilman (:nrna lannch cit.
. 0 4
• • . .
CHAPTER 6 LAND USE 9MPACTS
6.1 GOAL5
1. Improve the regulatory and non-regulatory tools that local governments and
citizens have to direct the future of the watershed towards the overall goal of
protection and enhancement.
2. Protect open space and sensitive areas such as springs, wetlands, floodplains, riparian zones, critical habitat and other landforms and functions that are
_ associated with the watershed.
3. Improve the level of cooperation, coordination and educated decision making
in regards to land use within the watershed.
6.2 BACBCGR0a.DND
Human land use in the Eagle River watershed is the major influence on the overall
health and condition of the watershed.
Land uses have impacted the quantity of water through human demand for the
resource through residential, commercial and industrial development; the quality
through additions of chemical and organic substances to the water from direct
sources such as mines or in-direct sources such as urban run-off; associated wildlife
habitat that is adjacent to water features or provides routes to water sources that
have been removed or blocked; recreation opportunities that depend on a particular
quantity or quality of water or access availability; and the aesthefic quality of the
water features which are often hidden or encroached upon by land uses.
Population Growqh
Between 1980 and 1990, the population of Eagle County increased by 64%. V1/ith
an average annual growth rate of near 7%, Eagle County is exceeding the 2 to 3%
growth rate that is considered a desirable pace by communities nationwide. For
several years running, Eagle County ranked as the third fastest growing population in
the state, with the top honors going to two urban counties on the front range. In
many ways, Eagle County is becoming an urban county. The bulk of the private
land in the County is located in the river and tributary valley bottoms and the
majority of the population lives along the Eagle River, presenting the image of a very
dense and developed section of the County. Development to accommodate the
needs and desires of the growing population has altered the watershed in many
ways, some of which were described above.
50
. .
Inconsistent Regulation
Inconsistencies between town and County stream rEflated regulations were identified .
during the planning process, in addition to other ineffective or deficient land use
practices and regulations. Town and County development setback regulations from
rivers and streams vary between 50', 30' and in sorne cases no setback is required.
This has not helped establish a consistent, protective greenbelt along the river which
has been identified as an essential component of rivier protection.
6.3 ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
The following issues that have been identified through the planning process are
listed in priority order, followed by discussion and recommended alternative actions
to address these concerns.
Issues: Mitigation of Land Use Impacts on Water Features Lack of Coordinated Planning and Tools
Access
Historical Resources Inadequately Protected
6.3.1 ISSUE: LAND USES AND RELATIONSHIP TO WATER FEATURES
Some industrial, commercial and residential land uses adjacent to water features
have a variety of negative impacts upon those water features including water quality
impacts, diminished or degraded wildlife habitat, diminished recreation opporturiities
and overall increased water supply demands. It may be possible to mitigate the
impacts of land use on the watershed by making selE;cted and specific changes in
the policies and regulations that citizens and local governments have as tools far watershed protection. The following recommendations are for
RfCOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Review and Revise Regulations for Consistency and Effectiveness
All Towns and the County should review and revise current regulations triat
deal with water, waterways, and drainage issues for all Towns and County,
including definitions, to eliminate conflicts, create consistency and promote
protection of the riparian and aquatic environrrients and as described
throughout the ERMP. This would include but not be limited to floodplairi,
subdivision, environmental impact, drainage and zoning regulations.
Generally, the emphasis of these revisions should be on:
*Providing buffers between water features and. uses;
51
*iViatching densities with river and tributary protection and community
growth values; *Discouraging land uses with higher impacts from the lands adjacent to
river and/or tributaries.
*Providing a consistent approach to the watershed by all local and
regional governing entities
The following "watershed- friendly" land use concepts: setbacks,
development densities, specific use policies, development and design
standards, open space protection, sensitive lands protection, overlay zoning,
improved floodplain regulations, are recommended for inclusion in local, state
and federal policy and regulation for consistent and coordinated protection of
the watershed resource from future land use impacts.
A. Setbacks:
1. To promote the river greenway concept which involves protecting the .
river and tributaries and associated habitat and aesthetics, all land use
regulatory agencies in the Eagle River watershed must adopt a
consistenY setbaclc that requires:
All structures and land disturbance shall be located outside of the
riparian zone or 900 year floodplain of a river, lake, perennial or
intermittent stream, or 75. feet whichever is greater. If necessary to
protect the riparian, floodplain or waterway, additional width may be
required.
AII vegetation shall be left- undisYurbed in its nagural s4ate within the
described protection zones. Vegetative disturbance allowed is
enhancement of the area with native riparian zone plantings (willows,
cottonwoods, etc.).
Approved trails, bridges, fences, irrigation structures, flood control and
erosion devices may be constructed thereon if there will be minimal or
no disturbance. Underground utilities may be located in such proteated
area with a Special Use Permit provided there is no afternative location
for such utilities, there witl be minimal or no disturbance and other
pertinent approvals are obtained (e.g. Corps of Engineers).
*Riparian aone is defined as the banks and adjacent vegetation influenced by the high water
tab/e. Plant types associated with riparian zone include but are not limited to cottonwoods,
willows, alders, aspens, and chokecherry. The presence or absence of these p/ants does not
always indicate a riparian community. Past land use practrces may have degraded the
vegetation to the point where it does not appear to have riparian characteristres but because
of the high water table in the area a change in the land use can quickly restore the riparian
community. Conversely, a few characteristic plants may not indicate a Prue riparian
community. For this reason on-site analysis is needed to he/p make this determination. The
agencies available to make these inspections include Co%rado Division of Wildlife, Soil
52
Conservation Service, Corps of Engineers, Eagle County Environmental Hea/th and other town
or County staff with appropriate training. Challenges to the on-site studies shall be based on • -
scientific analysis from expert sources. This definition of riparian was comprehensively
compiled from CDOW, Natura/ Resources Conservation Services (was SCS), USFS and US
Army Corps of Engineers definitions of riparian zone.
Shrubs and graaa
ty-eeu
1.
~
Shrubs
Sedyes end rushes
EmergeMS-
a'-~-.- - - -
Water Aquatic Rlparlan Upland
~Ecosystem Ecosystem EcosYstem y
B. Development Densities:
1. In Unincorqorated Areas of the Countv lands adjacent to the river and
creeks should be of graduated intensities with one to two acre lots;
permissible on the boundaries of communities, 10 acre lots at the -fringe
of the community influence area and the remainder of the lands
adjacent to the river and creeks shall reimain 35 acre parcel zoning.
(Resource), as the majority of unincorporated area land is zoned. These
densities are suggested in response to c:itizen concerns regarding
existing and potential future densities along the river and tributaries.
2. Within Incorporated Towns and Unincorporated Community Centers,
allow single-family, medium and high density residential development
and moderate sized commercial projects on properties adjacent to
creeks and river but implement riparian setbacks and seek the creation
of a common park/open space immediately adjacent to the river as part
of the development that ties into an easement running parallel to the
river for walking and fishing access and where specified in an adopted
trail plan, biking.
3. To protect wildlife habitat and aesthetics and discourage sprawl alung
the waterways, require cluster developnient on lands adjacent to the
river and tributaries.
4. As means to protect watershed resources from development that does
not correspond with the natural watershed carrying capacity, multi-
53
~
jurisdictionally support increased parcel size at sgate leve@ from 35 acres
go a minimum o$ 70 acres or higher and increase in state vvell permit
acreage minimum.
C. Specifiic Use PoYicies:
1. In Unincorporated APeas of the County, (most of which is currently
zoned Resource, 1 dwelling unit to 35 acres) do not allow commercial,
multi-family or mobile home park developments within the river corridor
or along any creek unless indicated as an area suitable for these uses in
the pertinent County community plan and buffered from the water
feature by a minimum distance of 300'. Within unincorporated
community centers 1i.e. Edwards, VVolcottl, uses shall conform to the
setback requirements described below (i.e. defined by riparian zone
limits, etc:).
2. tn Incorporatec9 Towns and fl.Dnincorporated Areas, prohibit future
proposed industrial or heavy service uses adjacent to the river and
tributaries for reasons of water quality, habitat, aesthetic and general
incompatibility with the riven and tributary environs. One possible
exception to this is gravel mining provided that they meet best
management practices as suggested in Chapter 3- Water Quality.
3. Water Consumptive Recreation Uses such as Golg Courses and Ski
Areas must be: completely self-sufficient in terms of water needs; able
to implement a self-monitoring water use program that includes best
management practices; able to prove that river or tributary water
quantity or quality will not be negatively impacted; not involve any
alteration of riparian or wetland habitat, and not accelerate land use
development beyond the carrying capacity of that particular area as
established by relative comprehensive plans. One golf course at each
town or unincorporated community (Edwards, etc.) is the recommended
limit for golf courses.
D. Dedelopnnent and Design Standards:
1. Adopt sitie deeelopment standards for all 35 acre or greater parceBs that
prohibit uses that will impair view corridors, eliminate critical wildlife
habitat, exacerbate wildfire, create extraneous roads and utility
easements, degrade water quality and quantity, exacerbate ISDS .
problems, cause or impact geologic hazards areas.
2. Adopt design standards for parcels and uses adjacent to the Eagle River
and tributaries that include at minimum: *Focusing the design and site orientation towards the river
54
. *Building heights of less than 35' feet and designed to step down in
height as they near the river and in response to natural topography ' *A minimum of 50' between clusters of buildings
*Lighting standards for downlighting
*View corridors into the river area without obstacles
*Trails, soft or hard surface, that provicie defined access to the river
corridor
*Native plant landscaping only
. *Berms in front of buildings to offset, no berms in view corridor to river
3. Develop master plans for each of the tributary valleys that propose
finite densities and carrying capacities based on natural elements and
community desires for each. Refine the~ Eagle County Master Plan to
include that same information on a future land use map.
4. Revise net developable land definition iri Eagle County and all towns
regulations that make that distinction tc? include riparian zones,
floodplains and wetlands.
E. Sensitive Lands Protection:
1. County and Towns cooperatively define sensitive lands, map sensitive
lands, and draft a sensitive lands ordinance that can be applied by all
towns and County that is defensible anci able to withstand legal
challenge.
Include standards for "buffer areas" imrnediately adjacent to onretland
areas and floodplains, where development would be required to be of
lower intensity adjacent to the sensitive area.
Sensitive lands should include but are is limited to wetlands,
floodplains, critical wildlife habitat, wellliead protection areas, aquifer
recharge areas, headwaters and tributaries, confluences and riparian
zones (public input has specifically ident:ified riparian zones that need
protection on Buck and Gore Creek, wel:lands on Lake, Squaw, Bruish,
Gore, Homestake, Cross Creek and on E:agle River near Edwards, Avon
' and Wolcott).
2. Wetlands "banks" are not considered ari acceptable justification of
removal of natural or established wetlands if the intent is to eliminate
wetlands or free flowing stream in other areas of the County and
displace resident species. (see also Chapter 4- Wildlife re: mitigation)
55
. ;
3. Advocate increased authority on ecological matters related to water
features protection being granted to the County and applicable tovvns
through adoption of entire House Bill 9049. F. TPails:
Trails planned in riparian area may not be environmentally sensitive and should
not be constructed within the riparian corridor if paved or not paved and over
3' in width. Some trail construction may be allowed in riparian habitats or
setbacks because of topographic.features or to reduce larger impacts by placing trails outside of these areas and no other reasonable option exists.
This should be done on a case by case basis and based on input from all
interested agencies and citizen groups. G. Open Space:
1. Ins'ure that lands set aside as open space through development or
governmental purchase rerviain open space perpeYually through plat or
deed restrictions, zoning or granting of conservation easements (when
eligible).
2. Rezone public lands to open space on zoning rnaps including State Land
Board, Division of Wildlife, USFS, BLM and other appropriate lands.
3. Pool gown and County open space resources to protect remaining
sensitive lands, open space buffer lands and appropriate ranchland or
agricultural uses that are located on private lands for perpetual
protection (sample acquisition methods: acquire through development
dedication; fee simple purchase or development right purchase).
4. Establish riparian lands as lands of highest priority to pro2ecg en federa9,
state, county or towns land acquisitions by trade, purchase, easement,
etc.
H. Overlay Zones:
1. For all of the specific regulation revisions described previously,
incorporation into existing regulations is one option. A second option is
to adopt an overlay zone for the river corridor, accompanied by a map,
that sets out the parameters for development within the river corridor.
The same technique can be used for each or some of the tributary
valleys.
56
1. Flood Plain Regulations Revisions:
. .
1. Prohibit development, encroachment or alteration of the 100 year
floodplain or federally qualified wetlands. Deny all floodplain alteration
permits (i.e. filling above flood level so Iland can be developed, etc.) and
wetland alteration permits. Exceptions to this provision are approved
trails, bridges, fences, irrigation structures, flood control and erosion
devices that cause little or no disturbance. Underground utilities may
be located in such protected area with.Special Use Permit approval
provided there is no alternative location for such utilities and there is
little or no disturbance associated with -the use.
2. Prohibit any alteration of river or stream channels unless approved as an
enhancement project by the pertinent agencies (i.e. drop structures).
3. Require all development adjacent to a water body to map 100 year
floodplain and address possible impacts, 4. Prohibit building projections or appurtenances (decks) into the riparian
zone, wetland or floodplain.
5. Determine which of the Army Corps Naitionwide Permits are problematic
and may warrant stricter control at a loc:al level. Revise regulations to
allow for local and possible state .review and state restrictions where
warranted.
6. Annually notify real estate agents and builders about floodplain
regulations. -
6.3.2 ISSUE: LACK OF COORDINATED PLANNING AND TOOLS Local governments do not have:
1. a comprehensive understanding of the watershed system ancl the balance
between human activities and the health of the watershed;
2. a comprehensive understanding or knowled(le of all the pertinent state and
federal agencies or regulations regarding watershed features;
3. enough information sharing occurring between local, state, and federal
levels and coordinated administration of regulations and management plans;
4. information sources that present a comprehensive picture of the watershed
resources;
5. enforcement tools or personnel.
57
o
RECOMiViEfVDED ACTIOiVS: 1. lEagle Rivep Management Cornmittee
Creage/Continue wiYh Eagle VRiver Management Plan ComrriiYtee following plan
completion to oversee action plan implementation, project review, policy
review, enforcement, grant application and information sharing. Encourage
additional citizen and elected official participation. Progress reports should be
compiled every six months for presentation to the Eagle Valley town councils,
BOCC and citizens through the media. 2. Enfopcement Carnpaign
Develop ajo6ng enforcemeng campaign that will take place over several
months and involve all relevant jurisdictions to survey the river for violations
and potential problems that need to be remedied by appropriate private party
or owner (dumping, erosion, point source pollution, encroachment, over-
allocating water to themselves), operation under terms of special use permit
(gravel pits), and expired uses. As part of the awareness and appreciation
campaign, include clean-ups and target specific debris and dumping problem
areas. through owners.
3. Mapping
Create a set of rriaps that detail the following information regarding the
watershed:
Access: existing river and tributary access easements and terms of
easement, endangered access points, potential access
points(particularly that provide access to adjacent public lands, possible
multiple use access sites (combined with parks), improvements
necessary at which sites (restrooms, launch ramps, parking, signs,
etc.), identifying existing and potential access points main stem, every
mile on the tributaries and more frequently within most densely
populated areas, fee areas, commercial limited areas, vehicle restricted
areas, closures for wildlife benefits, and other sensitive areas to avoid.
Land 4.Dses: areas acceptable for gravel extraction, areas where
disturbance has been caused by grazing or other agricultural practices,
parcel boundaries, ownership, private and public open space, roads and
trails, jurisdictional boundaries, zoning districts, existing land uses and
densities and recommended land uses, golf courses, snow dumps,
stormwater discharge areas, existing and proposed irrigation structures,
point source and non-point source problem areas, drop structures for
fisheries enhancement, distribution systems ofi existing water systems
58
. : (including storage and diversion points), hazardous irrigation structures ,
or areas where debris exists in the river
Transportation: _culverts, bridges and other transportation features that
negatively impact the watershed because of habitat, quantity, quality or
recreation impacts
Sensitive and Open Lands: critical open space and sensitive land areas
including but not limited to wetlands, wildlife habitat/calving and
nesting sites, wellhead protection areas, groundwater recharge areas,
headwaters, tributaries, riparian zones, floodplains, areas where
. floodplains aren't mapped, geo-hazard Eireas and where not mapped,
natural and human caused areas of erosion that need attention, soils for
determining septic and wellhead and quality conflicts, shallow ground
water areas, topography, greenbelt bufi'ers for all areas for habitat
linkage, Threatened and Endangered species locations; potential
Watchable Wildlife sites
2. Update Flood Maps
Obtain FEMA, Army Corps or Bureau of Reclarnation financial assistance to
complete flood mapping for the Eagle River and major tributaries in the -
watershed, including mapping for mud and debris flows. All Towns and
County should take part in the in the community flood rating system.
3. Map Exchange Lands
Develap a map of federal lands that local citizens and governments advocate
remaining public lands and not subject to land exchange. This reflects local.
concerns about protection of key open space, buffer or sensitive land parcels
Additionally, land trades can increase the amount af developable land which
may not be beneficial to the health of the watershed. .
4. Create Inventory of Reference Information .
, 1. Acquire a current set of air photos of the Ezigle River watershed for use in
planning and management of the watershed.
2. Identify local, State and Fed (BLM, USFS, et.) regulations and enforcement
procedure as they relate to land use and water features and create an
inventory list for inclusion in the final ERMP.
3. Include a data base and inventory of all information and studies related to
the Eagle River watershed as a single source of information on the watershed
in the final ERMP.
5. Work with Agricultural Representatives
59
O
, To inventory impacts o4 agriculgure on vvater $eatures, convene meeting with
all area ranchers to discuss problems with riparian impacts and what help they
need to control those impacts. Initiate as joint effort with NRCS, BLM and
USFS. Determine if agriculture is Fmpacting any particular location along Eagle
County streams (Ag. is exempt from nationwide permit process).
6.3.4 ISSUE: ,4CCESS Access to river and tributaries for fishing, boating, walking, etc. being eliminated or
impaired by development of land adjacent to the river and tributaries
RECOMMEiVDED ACTIOiVS:
1. Revise town and County land use regulation, policy and planning documents
and work programs to implernent access protection and enhancement actaons
identified in Chapter 4- Recreation.
6.3.7 ISSUE: HISTORICAL RESOURCES IiVADEQUATELY PROTECTED
Historical/Cultural/Archeological Resources within watershed not identified and or
protected or available for education;
~ RECOfViiViENDED ACTIONS:
1. Historical/Cultural Survey
Obtain a State Historical preservation grant to do a County-wide historica9
survey, working with Eagle County Historical Society and other existing
sources, Incorporate the study into the Eagle County iViaster Plan and all
: town plans as an. element that will be reviewed as part of land use proposals. .
Within the plan:
A. Identify sites that are suitable for improbernent fioP public v6satagoon
and ingerpretation. Develop plans for improvement inter-jurisdictionally
with the aid of State Historical preservation grants (e.g. historic barns)
B. Ob$ain cultural resource invengories that have been prepared as part
of Green Niountain augmentation plans. Request proof and copies from
augmentation candidates that cultural resource inventories have been
prepared and submitted.
C. Identify sites that are most threatened and in need of protection or
preservation work.
60
EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED
.
LAND USE PATTERNS
WATERSHED BOUNOARY
T
' ~ ~ ~ 'i
{ /
///G j i
f ~ ~ / i i ~ ~ ~ii . ii / j / ~ /i ~
~;vorri;vc ~
~ LAKS
LEGEND
~ i . i~. ~ i,, ! i~~ , .i <~r~ ~i,
~ ~'i ~ i~%ii/~2'~• /~j~ c•y/~% % STATE OF COLORADO
/ FOREST SERMCE
.
BUREAU OF WID MANACEYENT
RESIOENTYIL VEM LAIN OENSITY
i jj,~i ~ //ii i/ %~li'/~ /i lr ~ r'r % ~ i ii~~ i'~'~i? , %/n.i , ~ RESIOENTNL LOM OENSIiY
RESIOENTIAI MEqUN OENSITY
/ RESIOENTNL MKx1 OEN511N
i i~U ~ ~
~ p~ii
COMYERCML
r i//„ % i / .iC i, ~?i ~ i / ~ j ~
"~i / y / ~ / y' ~ / ~ ~ / / ~ i i i /
INDUSTRIAL
PUBLIC AYEMTKS/iACILiTIES
.r
i
,
WATERSHEO BOUNDARY COIF COURSES
~
/
,
EAGLE COUNTY LINE
. . ?
C0--0APTER 7: MPLEMENTAMN ACTMN PLAN
0
The implementation of this plan is expected to take place over several years and will
require the commitment of all local officials and the direct guidance of a specific
entity, as suggested in various chapters of the plan. This plan is intended to be
integrated into the work programs of the participating governments and agencies
and special interest groups where appropriate. ,4s discussed earlier in the. plan, plan
participants are not obligated to implement all or any of the plan recommendations
but are encouraged to have the foresight to implement as many as possible.
A?ction Plan Table
The following table synthesizes all of the actions recommended in the plan, indicates
who should or will be responsible for 'implementation, when the action should be
implemented, an estimated cost and whether or not the action is of a regulatory or
educational nature.
Priorities for Action Implementation
High PrioritY - the action should be taken as soon as possible, within the next
one to three years if feasible. Actions have been indicated as high priority if:
there are critical situations in need of attention before a situation degrades
further; or there are immediate windows of opportunity; or it undertaken
relatively easily with beneficial results; or it needs to be implemented before
associated actions that are related can be implemented.
Medium - the action is either: an item that is on-going now and needs to _
continue (e.g. Remedy of natural sedimentation problems or monitoring of the
Eagle Niine); or, is dependent upon other actions occurring first before it can
be moved up to a higher priority (e.g. evaluating a development's impact on
in-stream flow is dependent on establishing a defensible, optimum in-stream
~ flow).
Low - the action is important but does not have as critical an impact if it is not
implemented in the next five years. It does not mean, however, that these
items are unimportant and should not be implemented given the opportunity.
.
Funding
Funding costs are estimations only. Some actions can be implemented with existing
governmental resources such as available staff time. Others will require minimal or
significant financial resources from one or several entities.
61
RECOMMENDED ACTION
CHAPTER WHO EST. REGULATORY/
COST EDUCATION '
HIGH PRIORITY:
"Carrying-capacities" in Q, QU County, Staff/experts R
County/Town Master Plans Towns
Eagle River Impiementation Q, QU, LU Citizens, Volun./stafif E
Committee Twn,Cnty,
State, Fed
Water Conservation Program Q, W, QU Twn, Elec. E/R
Cnty, Cit. Off/Staff
investigate Growth Q, QU Twn, Cnty Elected R
Management Tools Off./Staff
Base development approvals Q, QU, W Twn, Cnty Elected R
on provision of "Wet Water" Off./Staff
vs. paper rights
Continue dialogue w/Front Q, QU Twn, Elected E
Range re: Water Cnty, Off./Staff
Development water
prov.
Determine "Optimum" W, Q, QU State, Study $S E/R
Instream Flows Fed,
water
prov., cit.
Investigate Engineering/ Q, QU, W Twn, Staff/Study E
Augmentation Solutions Cnty, $S
water
prov., cit.
~
Revise Stream Setbacks/No W, QU, LU Twn/Cnty/ Elected R
Riparian Disturbance Feds_ Off./Staff
Public Information Program W State/Fed Staff E
about Wildlife Twn/Cnty
' Revise Habitat Mitigation W Twn/Cnty/ Elected R
Requirements State Off/Staff
Local Water Quality QU, W Twn/Cnty/ Vol.lStaff E/R
• " Monitoring Program State/cits.
Native Vegetation Planting W, QU Twn/Cnty/ Vol./Staff E
Program State/Fed/
cits.
Wildlife Solitude W Twn/Cnty/ Elected E/R
Policies/Regulations State Off./Staff
Identify/Implement Joint Fish W Twn/Cnty/ Vol./Staff E
Habitat Project(s) State/cits.
Public Information Program WQ Twn/Cnty/ Staff E
about Water Quality State
Citizen Best Management WQ, W Twn/Cnty/ St9ff/Vol. E/R
Practices (BMP's) State
Construction & Development WQ Twn/Cnty Elected E/R
BMP's Off./Staff
. 62
:
Transportation & Parking Lot WQ Twn/Cnty Elected E/R a BMP's Off./Staff
Public Land Logging BMP's WQ USFS, Staff E/R
BLM
Implement Development LU Twn/Cnty Elected E/R
Densities adjacent to Off./Staff
River/Tribs
Implement Specific Use LU Twn/Cnty Elected E/R
PolicieslRegs Off./Staff
Sensitive Land Protection LU Twn/Cnty Elected E/R '
Off./Staff Build "Riparian-Friendly" LU Twn/Cnty/ Elected E/R
Trails Feds Off./Staff
Open Space Preservation LU Twn/Cnty Elected Off. E/R
Flood/Wetlands Regulation LU Twn/Cnty/ Elected R
Revision State/Fed Off/Staff
Joint Enforcement Campaign LU Twn/Cnty/ Vol./Staff E/R
State/Fed
Watershed R, LU Twn/Cnty/ Staff/Vol./ E
Opportunity/Constraint State/Fed contract $S
Mapping
Improve/Develop Access for R, LU Twn/Cnty/ Staff/Vol./ E/R "
Recreation ' State/Fed/ contract SS
cits
RECOANMEfVDED ACTIOfV CHAPTER WHO EST. REGULATORY/
COST EDUCATIOfVAL
RflEDIUfifl PRIORITY: -
Utilize Colorado River Q, QU Twn, Cnty, NA E
Decision Support System State
Water Analysis Q, QU Twn, Cnty contract E/R
Consultant Contract
Groundweter Sensitivity • Q, QU Twn, Cnty contract E/R
Study $ g
Purchase/Acquire Water Q, W Twn, Cnty, $S NA
Rights State
Consolidate Special Districts Q Water Staff/SS NA
Prov.
Management and Monitoring QU, W Twn, Cnty, Elected E/R
BMP'S State Off./Staff
Septic System Administration QU, W Cnty, State Elected E/R
BMP'S Off./Staff
Agriculture BMP's QU, W Cnty, Staff E
State, Feds
Recreation BMP's QU, W Twn, Cnty, Elected E/R
- 'State, Feds Off./Staff
63
y
Develop Wellhead Protection QU, W Cnty, State Elected E/R
Program Off./Staff '
Control Ute, Muddy, Alkali, QU, W Cnty, Vol./Sttiff E
Milk Creeks sediment flow State, Feds
Place Additional Gauges W State/Feds Vol./Stfiff E
Develop Access to Control W Twns, Vol./Steiff E/R
, Riparian Damage Cnty,
State, Feds
Maintain Wildlife Corridors as W Twns, Elected E/R .
Open Space Cnty, Off./Staff
State, Feds .
Revise "RiverlTrib. Friendly" W Twns, Elected E/R
Transportation Design Cnty, Off./Staff
Standards State,feds
Identify/Implement Stream W Twns, Vol./Staff E
Enhancement Projects Cnty,
State,
Feds, Cits
Inventory Riparian, Wetland, W Twns, Vol./Staff E
Floodplain Habitat/Identify Cnty,
Projects State,
Feds, Cits
• Improve to Effective levels W Twns, Elected E/R
Habitat Mitigation Trust • Cnty, State Off./Staff
Funds
Designate Sites for activities W Twns, Staff E
to lessen Impacts to Wildlife Cnty,
State, Feds
Continue Eagle Mine Clean-Up QU, W State, Feds Staff R
Implement LU Twns, Elected R
Development/Design Cnty Off./ '
Standards Staff
Investigate Overlay Zones for LU Twns, Elected R
RiverlTribs Cnty Off./Staff
Request FEMA update flood LU Twns, Elected R
mapping in Eagle County Cnty, Feds Off/Staff
64
v
~ RECORARAEfiIDED ACTIOW: CHAPTER UNHO ESY. COST REGULATORY/
EDUCATIOWi4L
LOW PRIORITY:
Evaluate Impacts of Local W State, Feds Staff E
Fish Shocking
Implement Fishing W State Staff E/R
Restrictions
Fence Areas of Disturbed W Twn, Cnty, State, Vol./Staft E
Riparian from Feds, cits
Livestock/Wildlife
Trade lands to obtain W, LU Twn, Cnty, Feds Elected Off. E
Riparian Land/Map Trade
Lands
Toxic Household Waste W Twn, Cnty, State Staff E
Dump
Restrictions on R Feds, State Staff E/R
Commercial Outfitters to
match Carrying Capacity
Inventory Impacts by LU Feds, State, Cit. Vol./Staff E
Agriculture
HistoricallCultural LU Twn, Cnty, State, Vol./Staff/Grants
Resourceslnventory Feds
65
~
GLOSSARY ~
Acre Foot -
The volume of water required to cover one acre of land to a depth of one foot. An
acre foot is equal to approximately 325,825 gallons, The capacity of Trout Pond in
Eagle-Vail is 7 acre feet, storage in Nottingham Lake near Avon is about 100 acre
feet, the combined capacity of the Two Black Lakes is approximately 600 acre feet,
the capacity of Homestake Reservoir is 43,000 acre feet, and Dillon Reservoir is
approximately 250,000 acre feet in size.
Adjacent To -
Meaning land that shares a property boundary with t:he river or a tributary or
includes said water feature within its boundaries, at the time of this plan adoption.
Aquatic Habitat -
Habitat available for use by fish and other aquatic species. The area of usable
habitat in a stream typically increases as stream flovr increases, except when stream
flow is very high and water velocity is greater than clesirable.
Baseflow -
The period of the year in which stream flow in rivers and streams is the lowest,
typically from August through April. During this period, stream flow primarily results
from groundwater that is discharged to stream and rivers.
Build-out Conditions -
The population that is projected to occur with complete development assuming a
development density comparable to existing conditions on all planned and platted
sites. Actual build-out could vary significantly, depending upon market conditians
and land use approvals. . Carrying Capacity-
The number (amount) and type of use an area can ac:commodate without alteririg
either the environment or the user's experience beyond a degree of change deeimed
acceptable by the management objective. •
Cubic foot per second or cfs -
A rate of stream flow equal to one cubic foot of water (7.5 gallons) every second.
One cfs flowing for one day results in a volume of water equal to two are feet. The
Eagle River near Gypsum typically flows about 100 to 200 cfs during the low flow
winter months. During peak snowmelt the flow of tfie river near Gypsum often
exceeds 3,000 cfs. The flow of Gore Creek at Vail i.s usually about 10 to 15 cfs
during the winter months. Peak snowmelt stream flaw of Gore Creek is often 900
cfs or greater. 66
~
• Consumptide Vlatep Use - ° That amount of water that is actuaily consumed by a given water use and does not
return to the stream. For example, domestic water use typically consumes about 5
_ to 10% of the total amount of water that is diverted.
DepleYion -
The use of water in a manner which makes it no longer available to other users in
the same system. For example, immediately below a municipal diversion headgate,
the stream depletion is equal to the amount of water diverted. Downstream of
return flow from a municipal wastewater treatment plant, the depletion is equal to
the amount of water actually consumed by the municipal use that is not returned to
the steam.
Domestic Watep Use -
Water used for household purposes, and for lawn and garden irrigation in residential
areas. Bnstream Flow -
The amount of stream flow in a stream or river that is recommended to maintain
natural resource values such as fish habitat, recreation or water quality.
On-Basin Water Diversion -
The diversion of water from the Eagle River Basin for use within the Eagle River
watershed.
Vnstream Flow Water Rights -
A minimum flow standard established by the Colorado V1/ater Conservation Board in
consultation with the Division of Wildli#e, Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation,
and/or agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of the Interior
that is intended to preser1e the natural environment to a reasonable degree. (CRS
37-92-102(3)).
Non-Pofimt Source IPollution -
A source of pollution that has a diffuse origin. For example, sediment erosion from a
construction site or oil and grease washing off roads in a thunderstorm.
Non-Structural Strate9y -
A water supply strategy, such as conservation, that does not involve the
construction of a dam,. reservoir or diversion facility.
Opgirnum Onstrearn Flow -
A flow amount which maximizes an instream flow value such as fish habitat,
recreation, aesthetics, or water quality.
67
,
Out-of-Basin Diversion - •
The diversion of water from the Eagle River Basin for use at locations outside of the ~
Eagle River watershed.
Point Source Pollution -
Pollution that comes from a discreet or specified source such as industrial or
municipal wastewater discharge.
Return Flow - '
Water returned to the stream after being diverted for some use such as irrigatimn or
domestic purposes. Usually return flows occur dowinstream of the point of
diversion.
Riparian -
The banks and adjacent vegetation influenced by the! high water table. Plant types
associated with riparian zone include but are not limited to cottonwoods, willows,
, alders, aspens, and chokecherry. The presence or absence of these plants does not
always indicate a riparian community. .Past land use practices may have degraded
the vegetation to the point where it does not appear to have riparian characteristics
but because of the high water table in the area a change in the land use can quickly
restore the riparian community. Conversely, a few characteristic plants may not
indicate a true riparian community. For this reason cin-site analysis is needed tc) help
make this determination. The agencies available to rnake these inspections include
Colorado Division of Wildlife, Soil Conservation Service, Corps of Engineers, Eagle
County Environmental Health and other town or County staff with appropriate
training. Challenges to the on-site studies shall be b;ased on scientific analysis from
expert sources. This definition of riparian was comprehensively compiled from
CDOW, SCS, USFS and USAC definitions of riparian zone.
Shoshone Demand -
The water demand associated with the Shoshone Hydroelectric facility on the
Colorado River in Glenwoo.d Canyon. This is a senioi, water right that frequently
limits upstream diversions in the Eagle River Basin.
Water Right -
The legal right to use a specified amount of water. kNater rights.in Colorado are
administered according to priority (first in time, first in right). An absolute water
right is a right that has been historically applied to a beneficial use. A conditional
water right is a right that has not yet been developecl or used, but that retains its
historical priority. Conditional rights are usually associated with water projects 'that
require years of planning and construction.
Water Right Augmentation -
A means to allow diversion of water by a junior water right when this junior right
would otherwise be out-of-priority and unable to divert water. An augmentation
plan typically replaces (or augments) the amount of vvater consumed by a junior
68
0
0
° water right with water from a reservoir, or with water previously used for another
r purpose such as irrigation. By replacing the amount of water consumed, the amount
of water available to senior downstream water rights is not diminished.
"Wet" Water -
,4ctual water supply as opposed to supply granted by water rights.
Coneersion Table ~
1 acre foot of water = 43,560.0 cubic feet or 325,581.0 gallons
1 cubic foot per second (cfs) = 450.0 gallons per minute
= 646,320.0 gallons per day
' =1.983 acre feet per 24 hours
= 59.5 acre feet for 30 days
= 724.0 acre feet per year
69
REFERENCES '
Calow, P. & G.E. Petty, The Rivers Handbook: Hvdre)logical and Ecological Principles
Blackwell Science Inc. 1992.
, Colorado Division of Wildlife, 1992. 1991 Annual Renort to the People of Colorado.
Prepared by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Derrver, Colorado.
. Colorado Division of Wildlife, 1982. Colorado Mammal Distribution Latilong Studv•
Prepared by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Denver, Colorado. Dynesius, M. and Nilsson, C., 1994. Science. Excerpt from the Rocky Mountaan
News, IVovember 20, 1994. Denver, Colorado.
Eagle River Assembly, Overview of Eagle River Water Basin Issues - Phase I Report,
Septemtier 1994.
Hunter, Christopher, Be:ter Trout Habitat: A Guide to Stream Restoration and
Manaqement, Island Press, 1990.
Stoddart, L. A. and Smith, A. D., 1955. Ranae Management. McGraw-Hill,
New York, New York. 433p.
Thomas, J. W. and Toweill, D. E., 1982. Elk of North America: Ecology and
Management. University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln, Nebraska. 698 p.
Walmo, 0. C., 1981. Mule and Blacktail Deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln, Nebraska. 685 p.
Yampa Valley Alliance, 1992. Yampa Vallev Trails and Recreation Conceptual I31an.
, .
I
~ ,
~
~~14 1
70
ee
db
TOWltl OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road Departrnent of Community Development
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21381479-2139
F.4X 303-479-2452
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning and Environmental Commission
From: Community Development
Date: January 23, 1994
RE: Masonry Fireplaces in reference to the Fireplace Ordinance
Staff: Russ Forrest & Paul Reeves
I. BACB(GROUND:
In response to the PEC recommendations on January 9, 1995, the Environmental Health staff
have proposed to modify the existing Fireplace Ordinance wording. The intent of the
rewording of the Ordinance is in response to PEC's concern that masonry fireplaces can be
used improperly (ie. with the doors open) and therefore not meet the set standards for EPA
phase II units.
There are at least six manufacturers that produce a product that looks like an open hearth
fireplace, yet is a certified EPA Phase II unit. The current manufacturers include the Moberg-
Royal Crown model 3036, Fireplace Xfirordinair models 36A & 44A, Biofire model 4x3,
Deitmeir-Ward-Stroud model Envirotech Radiant, Temp-Cast model 2000, and Tulikivi models
I(TU2100L & I<TU2100. These units have a full masonry firebox rather than an insert that
would be placed in a firebox. The doors of these units tend to be larger than a typical phase
II unit, and could therefore tempt owners to operate the unit with the doors open. However,
there are many other wood burning units that can be operated with the doors open or run
improperly and therefore generate more than the 7.5 grams per hour(EPA particulate standard).
There are no emission test results available that address the operation of units with the doors
open. Since we have no information on this, we do not know if these units are consistent
with the intent of the Ordinance.
II. PROPOSIED CHARlGE:
The following is one way to reword part of the Ordinance to exempt this type of unit:
Chapter 8.28 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
Section 8.28.020 Definitions
B. "Certified solid fuel burning device" shall mean a solid fuel burning device
which is certified by the Environmental Protection Agency and by the Air
Pollution Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health (ic) to produce
7.5 grams of particulate per hour or less. This shall include both catalytic and
non-catalytic Phase II stoves as well as pellet burners and any other technology
which can be shown to meet these emissions criteria. This definition shall
exclude any unit that is c4nstructed of a full masonry fire box with no insert,
equipped with a secondary damper that would facilitate aperation with the
doors open. If data is produced to prove that t:he abave criteria is met when the
unit is operated vuith the doors open, the unitt shall be allowed.
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIOiV:
In the past.two weeks staff has further researched this issue:, and have spoken with a number
of fireplace retailers. In addition, staff have carefully reviewed the effectiveness of our current
air quality policy. To date the policy has been effective in reducing PM10 levels in the Vail
Valley (see attached figure). In speaking to retailers, it was found that there are a wide variety
of wood burning and pellet units which meet EPA phase II emission standards that could be
opened or run improperly and most likely not mest this air quality standard. There was also
a unanimous feeling that people which have wood burning units which can be opened up,
typically do not choose to do so. Also, there is no supporting documentation to determine
what the emissions are of any wood burning unit which are not operated as recommended by
the manufacturer.
Staff would like to recommend carefully monitoring the installation of masonry fireplaces and
vuorking with retailers to insure that clients are informed that the glass doors need to remain
closed during operation. Another consideration is that short: term guest units have by far the
most significant impact on our air quality, and the cost of these units will be cost prohibitive
for this type of installation. Yherefore, it is unlikely that the improper use of a masonry
fireplace would nEgatively affect air quality in Vail.
F:IEVERY0NE\PAUL\PECMASN2.MEM PRINTED ON RECVCLED PAPfR
I•~~ 01!23i55 10:49 15~ 503 2276 4548 tiY~`,LTER "iOBEkC ~j 02
,
F I !RLS1'ACEti, IN('.
921 5.1N, MC?kRISON ~1'ItLL'1, SUiI*F. 4:39
FARESPACES I'ORTL,1Nu, oRFGc~N 97205
PHONr 1503) 117-054"
FAX (503) 227-05413
Li u
FrxEYl.Ac:r:s ANa rcx)hr;nNcES
PEMORAIDUM
b . d
I3AT'Eo January 23, 1995
. TOe. Planning and Environmental Cornmission
Town of Vail '
' Vail, Colorado
' rROMs Walter i-faberg, Px'esident .
. I'ireSpaces, Irc. -
Port 1 anrl, OrPgon
REo Frcposed restri,^ti nnr, fnr the
Moberg-Royal Crcwn 3036 fireplaC2s (24RC3036)o
ati has just come t-o our attention that the Planning and
E-nvironmental Commicoion is going to hear 2.r0umantS tnday
regarding Section 8o28.020 of your Chapter 3.28 Air Fnllution.
CunLiol regulationse After apca)ciag with :tua6ell ForesL frcm t'r.p
Department of Conmunity Deveiopment and Bll1 nndeiSOn, c:>f the ,
COmmisSiUri lo5t wt2ek, we have somc in-.Earmatior1 ~)Ihout t}:<~ r.ature
Qf the argu.ments, and offer the following staterr.cnt for yvur
consideratione
Reqarding potential ?nd reasonab?e obuse of tt,e I.-RC3036 by users
violating standard oUeratin g proce3ures. We do r.Ut bel~eve Mir.
Ariderson's ccntenrioa that users wil-I leave our C00rS a1l(I ~ialll~J~lb
apen, any more than other allowed devicPs wi i;h glass doors and
bypass damperse '1'he 11;RC3036, like other clean-burning devices.,
is not designed for. nor equipped with a screen, fo-- open-doo_ operationsa The doors, with their glass panes and retine(I
fixtures are, in fcct, both M key functional and -aesthet i c: part
of the MRC3036o Our custemers do not purchase this product,'with
tha PitrPnaP of removing the doors. h'hile an uninfcxmed
prospective buyer may ask if the heater can be operated wi th the
dcors open, thA pdor.at.ed buyer cduickly a.earns the aefects in
leaving thern open, to wite . A) The shallow f irebox -of the MRC3036, combiried with vi gorous
cornbuction, t-hrows £lame ar1Ci sparks very close to thc
opening of the tireboxo It.is a safety hazar.'c3 i•o leave the
doors opcn (ac with al]. koodstoves).
B) W11en the dcors are opcn,thcrc are tubes, gasketino, ei nr3
baffles that are exposed, reducing the aesl:hetic anpearance
ob ttae ~r~eciit,y o
a °
~ .01i23%95 10:49 d 503 227 0548 WALTER tIOBERG Qj 6~
. ,
MEMORANDUM ;lanuazy 23, 1995
Planning and Environmental Comnissibn
Town of Vail
C) With the *;RC3036, while capable.of hawing the doors open for
the shozt times of reloading witriout: spilling gases, ai2d
. even with the bypass damper open (for prirnir.g L'here .are uneven pressures during lonaer-term iDperatipns that woulcl
. frequeritly resuit in smcke spillage (<as will all woodstoves).
if these were left open.
In summary, although our product n.rovides some very gaod
aesthetic similarities to maeonry firepla.ces, it is in fact a
. stove and it has been eur universal experi.ence over. the 1Gst two
years of sales and operations, that users do not leave the doars
and dampers oFen. .
. While the subject of wood-burning i:s a legitir:iate subject
for any town cormission, we wou1d hnpa that any r.Pgi)lai:ion would
not un.aizJ.y discriminate against the MRC:3036 simply bccause of
the masonry firebo:s cons:ruction. The use of masnn.r.y anri
refractory materiaZs are, in fact, key to the success oi:clean=-
burning combustion proCC33c3 and arc morc durable fox' t,he long-
term reliable operaticn.
Users in Vail who wart to burn wood re:sponsi.bly would simpl..y
'.be foscea tv pure:lic5e L11C iut--tal slove3 ctiriently allohed, with a
net increase in ernissions due to their general.ly h.i.gher emissions
faCtoxs. 'isers in vail who want to buz•n wvuc3 irie5~~~:bil,].y will
nqre.likely use "traditional" rnethods of violations: converti_nq
_ cheaper gas log typ$ installations witri wood-fi:eled eperat.i.vii:s.
Hopefully, enfarcement will help keep Vail's airshed as clean as '
possible. As long as only the cleanest devices arP allowed, .
however, w-e hope that you will continue ta include our ve.ry clean
and.very cu.-able, Colorado-approved devices.
I am available to discuss tihis fur-ther with 8ny of the
Commissioners. Please feel free to call me at (5(}3) 227-0547.
Thank you. .
• r:
~
p
a
DE58~~ ~OARD AGENDA
FebruarZr 15, 1995
3:00 P.M.
PR0.9ECT ORSENTAT90N 92:00 p.m.
56TE VaSBTS 9:30 p.m.
1. Wittemeyer - 338 Rockledge Road.
2. Town of Vail - Pulis Bridge at Vail Valley Drive.
3. Vail Mountain School - 3160 Katsos Ranch Road.
4. Kaiser - 4916 Juniper Lane.
5. Lions Mane Condominium Association - 1116 Sandstone Drive.
Drivers: George and Randy
1. Town of Vail - Conceptual review of Pulis Bridge reconstruction. L,W
Pulis Bridge at Vail Valley Drive.
Applicant: Town of Vail
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Conceptual review - no vote taken.
2. Parkside Villas - Concepfiual review of seven new single family residences. LW
1546 Matterhorn Circle/Part of the NE 1/4 SW 1/4, Section 12, TSS, R81 W of
the 6th Principal Meridian.
Applicant: Elk Meadow, Inc.
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Conceptual review - no vote fiaken.
3. Vail Mountain School - Addition to building. RS
3160 Katsos Ranch Road/Part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Pam Hopkins, representing the Vail Mountain School
MOTION: B. Borne SECOND: S. Brainerd VOTE: 4-0
Consent approvea.
4. Lions Mane Condominium Association - Replacement of retaining GR
walls and deck.
1116 Sandstone Drive/Lions Mane Condominiums, Lot A-5, Block A, Lionsridge 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Ed Drager, representing the Lions Mane Condominium Association
MOTION: B. Borne SECOND: G. Amsden VOTE: 4-0
Approved with three condi4ions.
.
5. Up the Creek - Sign/Awning application. GR
223 Gore Creek Drive/Creekside Building.
Applicant: Annie Egan/American Awning
MOTION: B. Borne SECOND: S. Brainerd VOTE: 4-0
Tabled to March 1, 1995.
6. Crossview - Conceptual review of site plan only. GR
The Valley, Phase II.
Applicant: Crossview Properties, LTD.
MOTION: B. Borne SECOND: G. Amsden. VOTE: 4-0
Tabled to March 1, 1995. 7. Kaiser - 250 request for an addition to primary/secondary residence. GR
4916 Juniper Lane/Lot 3, Block 5, Bighorn 5th Addition.
Applicant: Galen Aasland, representing Ursula Kaiser
MOTION: B. Borne SECOND: G. Amsden VOTE: 4-0
Approved with three conditions.
8. Wittemeyer - 250 request for a kitchen area addition. GR
338 Rockledge Road/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 3rd Filing.
Appiicants: John and Nancy Wittemeyer
MOTION: B. Borne SECOND: S. Brainerd VOTE: 4-0
Approved.
9. Ferguson - New single family residence. RS
1205 Westhaven Gircle/Lot 48, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: David Ferguson
MOTION: B. Borne SECOND: S. Brainerd VOTE: 4-0
Approved with conditions.
10. Serrano's - Reconstruction of building. AK 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Margretta Parks, represented by Glenn M. Heelen
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled to March 1, 1995.
11. Hitchcock - Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence. LW
421 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 3, Bloc.k 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Christopher Hitchcock
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled to March 1, 1995.
2
0
12. . Lions Square Lodge - Review of new lobby addition. JC
660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Lions Square Lodge Homeowners Association, represented by Bill Pierce
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled to March 1, 9995. .
13. Thain - Changes to approved plans. JC
483 East Gore Creek Drive/Lots 8 and 9, Vail Village 4th Filing.
Applicant: John and Carmen Thain
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled indefinifely.
14. Garton's - Sign/Awning application. LW
143 East Meadow Drive/Crossroad Center Mall Building. Applicant: Dave Garton
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled indefiinitely.
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Michael Arnett Hans Woldrich
Bob Borne
Sally Brainerd
Greg Amsden (PEC)
STAFF APPROVALS
One Track Mind - Add one window sign to each store. LW
203 Gore Creek Drive/Vail 21 Building and Mill Creek Court Building.
Applicant: Larry Ast/High Tech Signs
Base Mountain Sports - Add window signs to each store. LW
492 East Lionshead CircleNail 21 Building, Vail Village Inn and Landmark Building.
Applicant: Larry Ast/High Tech Signs
Bloomberg - Place small satellite dish antenna (18-inch diameter) on parapet wall LVU
on the roof of the Mountain Haus Building.
292 East Meadow Drive/Mountain Haus Building.
Applicant: Michael Bloomberg
Marriott Hotel - Sign application. GR
715 VVest Lionshead Circle/Marriott Vail Mountain Resort Hotel.
Applicant: Lee Snyder for Marriott Hotel
3
r
Up Your Image - Sign application. LW
168 Gore Creek Drive/Lodge Promenade.
Applicant: Chuck Struve, representing Up Your Image
Lohre = Minor alteration/change to approved roof materials. GR
1300 Westhaven Circle/Lot 25, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Buff.Arnold, representing the Lohres
Edwards - Hot tub. LW
1402 Moraine Drive/Lot 1, Dauphinais/Moseley Subdivision 1;;t Filing.
Applicant: David Edwards
j 4