HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-05-23 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
REVISED AGENDA
VAIL TOVVIV COUfVCIL
WORK SESSI~N
TUESDAX, MA1f 23, 9995
12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUiVCIL CHAfViBERS
EXPANDED AGEP1DA
12:00 A.M. 1. Review of the Vail Commons short-listed developers
Andy Knudtsen
Chris Cares ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Reviewr material to be presented at
meeting.
1:30 P.M. 2. Vail Recreation District (VRD) request to change the zoning from the
Russell Forrest Natural Area Preservation District to the General Use District for the Vail
Ernie Bender Golf Course Maintenance Facility located at 1278 Vail Valley Drive, Parcel
E, Vail Valley 7th Filing.
ACTIOiV REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review and provide comments on
the proposed zone change request being made by the Vail Recreation
Distric4.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On April 4, 1995, the Town Council
unanimously approved changing the Vail Land Use Plan designation for
this property from "Open Space" to "Public Semi Public". This zone
change request is the second step, in a three-step process, that could
enable the District to apply for a conditional use permit to remodel the
facility. This maintenance facility is currently a legal non conforming use
on property that is zoned fVatural Area Preservation (NAP). The use of the
site is not consistent with the zoning (the only permitted use in iVAP is
nature preserve) and has existed on the site since 1966. The site is used
. for storage of fuel, equipment, and various supplies used to maintain the
golf course.
2:00 P.M. 3. Site visits to approximately 12 parcels of property throughout Town in
Jim Curnutte preparation for the June 6th Town Council evening meeting, at which time
Russell Forrest Council will consider Resolution IVo. 13, Series of 1995, to change the Land
Use Plan designation of the properties (and 5 others that Council has
already visited).
ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Conduct site visits to the properties
proposed for Land Use Plan designation changes.
BACKGROUiVD RATIOIVALE: On May 8, 1995, the PEC unanimously
recommended approval to change the Land Use Plan designations of 17
parcels of property throughout the Town, from their current designations to
the Open Space and Public/Semi-Public designations. (See attached staff
recommendation to the PEC dated May 8, 1995).
4:00 P.M. 4. Discussion re: Sales Tax on Animal Prescription Drugs.
Dr. Sheila Fitzpatrick
Sally Lorton ACTION REQUESTED OF COUfVCIL: Listen to Dr. Fitzpatrick's request
Steve Thompson to exempt drugs prescribed to animals from taxation. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Dr. Sheila Fitzpatrick claims that the drugs
she prescribes to animals are the same that are prescribed to human
beings and therefore should be exempt from tax. The sales tax code
exempts prescription drugs for humans and taxes drugs prescribed to
animals.
STAFF RECOMMEIVDATIONS: Staff does not see a reason to change the
current regulation.
1
~
4:10 P.M. 5. Regional Transportation System:
Paul Gotthelf a. Bike Path Coalition.
Larry Grafel b. Recommendations.
Mike Rose
ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUfVCIL: Discussion options, come to
consensus on issues to be taken to the June 6, 1995 Mass Transportation
working group of elected officials.
BACKGROUfVD RATIONALE: Three previous "Summit" meetings have
taken place regarding the development, organization, and operations of "a"
Regional Transportation System. To date nothing has been resolved, nor
has there been any real forward movement. The Eagle County Mass
Transit Committee and attendees to the summit meetings thought that
there needed to be a summit of Elected Officials from the funding entities
to break the deadlock, discuss the issues, and select a direction for mass
transportation within Eagle County.
STAFF RECOMMEfVDATIONS: Council must discuss the following issues
and develop a position regarding the following:
1. V1lhat does the concept/vision of "Regional Transportation" include
and exclude?
2. How do we "de-politicize" the operational aspect of mass
transportation? Is it a stand alone authority with appointed
representation, or is it something else?
3. VVhat are the financial implications regarding capital, facilities, and.
operations? NVhat funding issues/options must be overcome?
4. How should mass transportation continue to be implemented?
Short term funding requirements, i.e. Gypsum route, continued
funding of Leadville, etc.? Long term target(s)?
5. Should a"Transportation Tax" be submitted to the voters of Eagle
County this November? UVould/should it include bike paths and
trails?
5:10 P.M. 6. Golf Course Street Project Bid Award
Larry Grafel
Greg Hall
5:20 P.M. 7. PEC Report.
Mike Mollica
5:35 P.M. 8. DRB Report.
Randy Stouder/George Ruther
5:50 P.M. 9. The applicant, the Vail Valley Foundation, is requesting the Town Council's
George Ruther permission to proceed through the planning process to construct a crowd
control fence at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or deny the applicanYs
request to proceed through the planning process.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On May 15, 1995, the Vail Valley Foundation
submitted a Design Review Board application to erect a Crfoot, wrought
iron fence around the amphitheater. The expressed purpose of the fence
is to manage crowds during events at the amphitheater. A site plan is
attached for your reference.
2
o .
The purpose of this request is to allow the applicant to initiate the DRB
process. If the Council is interested in the details of the design, the
Council will have an opportunity to "call-up" the item after it has been
reviewed by DRB.
5:55 P.M. 10. Information Update.
6:05 P.M. 11. Council Reports.
6:15 P.M. 12. Other.
6:25 P.M. 13. Executive Session.
6:55 P.M. 14. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOAflINC MEETIIdG START TIfNES BELOVV:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
0 6 0 * • 0 0
THE NEXT VAIL TOWBd COUNCIL REGULAR VVORK SESSION
lAIILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/6/95, BEGINPIING AT 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
TBiE FOLLOWIBdG VA1L 70WP1 COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIOid
!AlILL BE OPd YUESDAY, 6/13/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CFOAiNBEFiS.
. THE NEXT VABL TOVIlM COUNCIL REGULAF3 EVEPIING MEETING
W1LL BE ON 7UESDAY, 6/6/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IGd TOV COUNCIL CFEANIBERS.
m 0 • • • • •
C:WGENDA.WSE
3
REVISED AGENDA
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
lNORiC SESSION
TUESDAY, MAY 23,1995
"
12.00 P.M. BN TO!! COUNCIL CHaA9VIBERS
1. Vail Commons UVrap Up.
2. Discuss Rezoning of VRD Maintenance Facility.
3. Site Visit re: Change in Land Use Plan.
4. Discussion re: Sales Tax on Animal Prescription Drugs.
5. Regional Transportation System:
a. Recommendations.
b. Bike Path Coalition.
6. Golf Course Street Project Bid Award
7. PEC Report.
8. DRB Report.
9. Vail Valley Foundation Request to Proceed Through the DRB Process for Fence
Improvement for Ford Amphitheater.
10. Information Update.
11. Council Reports.
12. Other.
13. Executive Session.
14. ,4djournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START 71ilAES BELOVV:
(ALL YIAAES ARE APPROXIIViATE AND SUBJECT T'O CHANGE)
* • • • 0 • •
TFIE PlEXT VABL TOWN COUNCIL REGULA?IR WORIC SESSION
lMILL. 8E ON YUESDR,V, 6/6/95, ~BEGINNIfVG AT 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOlNING !/AIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR VlIORK SESSION
!AlILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/13/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAflflBERS.
THE NEXT bAEL T01A/N COUNCIL REGULAR EVEIVENG MEETING
!AlILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/6/95, BEGIPINIiVG 14T 7:30 P.M. Ild TON COUNCIL CHANABERS.
~ • ~ ~ a ~ •
C:WGENDA.WSE
PUBLIV NOTgCE
VAIIJ TO'I8N ~ OU1'tl Ce L Mr, riTg.lqG
Tuesdav, Mav 30 1995
Work session............ 1V0 IVIEETIlVG O1V 5th TLTESDAY OF NTONTH
~
VAIL TOWN COUIVCIY. M[EETIN(a SCHEDI.TLE
(as of 5/23/95)
JtlJNEy 1995
In an attempt to respond to scheduled meeting demands, as well as adhere to mandated
ordinance and charter requirements, Council meetings are scheduled at the following times:
EVENING MEETYNGS
Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each
month, starting at 7:30 P.M. These meetings will provide a forum for citizen participation
and public audience for conducting regular Council business.
WORK SESSIONS
VETork sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues
before the Council, will now be scheduled to begin at 2:00 P.M. (unless otherwise noted) on
everv Tuesday afternoon.
THE 1395VAIE. TOWN COUNCIL MEETYNG SCHEDgTLE
' ~S AS FOI.Y.OBVS:
Tuesdav, June 6 1995
Work session............ 11:00 A.M. (atarting time determined by length of agenda)
Evening yneeting......... 07:30 P.M.
Tuesdav, June 13 1995
i]flork session............ 02:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda)
Tuesdav, June 20 1395
Work session............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda)
Evening xneeting......... 07:30 P.M.
Tuesdav, June 27 1995
Work session............ 02:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda)
TOVVN OF VAIL P~.uc~u ~rar~~eyar ,
Assistant Town 1Vlanager
I
SDVT BY: FAGLE COUN'fY ; 5-23-95 ; 12:11 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 2
:
May 23, 1995 - 12:22 ~:r•
. .
fnc« cauNrv RIm.dNnrc;
_ ~~.~Y•..r^ . 551 f3ROA1)WAY
oFRCE QF THE P.O. .60x 850
RQflRD Of L'OM9RNI5$lOWERS EAGIf. CCILORAI?CS 81631
fAX: (403) 329•7207
'.-<=:t:.;:
_;}=:;~r,y~..
. -=====EAGLE COLl1VTY9 COLORADO
AMENDED,
AGENDA 041F llNT"Y COMM1SSiOIVEI~~
~~~~ING DAY
MAY 30, 1996
AAffoo4i}ooop~ aocut?trAOQt7A8ouuAaooAfSbaoopi
9o00 FIltlAl6 SETTLGMG17T FOR 9HE DIlY'6/G CORf'VfV1TIOGtl
FOR EAGLE RtVER DROP STRIlCTURES
Jian Fritze, County Attom~~
~~~~ON: Consider approva9.
~ 91 RESOLUT8O8V CONFERRiNG POWER OF ATfOitNEY FOR
DRA1iV18YG ON 4.E'i-fER OF CREDIT IVOo 802-0744 FOR
DONALD B11iD AND GREGOIZY JAt71/1S Jim Fdtze, Gaunty Attorney .
ACTIIONe Cansider approval.
940 _ 9:55 WORK SESSIOIV - COAAMl1tVITlf DEVELQPIVIENT
84eittt Montag, Director, Community Development
9:55 - 90:13 PLAT AND RESOLUTION SIg°aNING
6Cathy Eastley, Planraing Techniciarn, Cornrmuni4y
Development
9~09~ - 10o30 BREAK
SENT BY:EAGLE CO[1NTY ; 5-23-95 ; 12:12 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 2/ 2
P0-314-94-P-4!TE CiZEE1C PUD
6Cathy Eastley, Planning Technician, Communi4y
Develapment .
AMOR9: Yo consider a reques4 for a storage facility.
ZC-264-94=UTE CREEK PUD
9Cathy EasUey, Planning Technician, Community
Development
ACgM: To csonsider a request for 2 zane change fPOrn resource
to 9'9JD for a storage facility. .
1125 - 11:46 BE-66-96-BEAIIER CttEE1C STH FIUNGP LOT 6, BLOCiC 2
Kathy Eastley, Planning Technician, Community
Development
ACTMo To cor?sider a request for a. Bualding EnVelope
Artnendmenfi.
M45 - 12.00 SU-955-94-AF7-EBY CREEf( LOTS 72 & 73
Kathy Eastley, Planning Technician, Community
Development
ACTIONa To consider a reqaaes4 to arnend fihe Finaf F'la4.
92000 _ 1o30 LUf~CH 1:30 -2.45 ZS-364-95mGAME CREEK CLIIB
Kathy Eastley, F'Ianning Technician, CommuncQy
Development
~~~ON: To consider a reques4 for a private cPub, one 4
bedPOOm guesg cottage, assor,iated utilities and access.
2:45 - 4:00 PD=335=96-Sm9NFiISKEY CitEEK
PeuP Clarkson, F°Isnner, Camrnunity Development
AC"~~ON: To consider 13 single family lots and a use by iight for
the existing unit as a bed and breakfast.
4.00 _ 4:15 AP9NUAL WILDFIFtE OPElaATIQN PLAN FOR ElltG9.E
COUNTY 1995
A.J. Johnsqn, Sheriff
A~~~ONo Consider approval.
T11E AIEXYMEE71A4CJ QF YHE (EACiL.E CWN4V CQMAAI&sIDWERS YNIt BE HELD ON JUPdE S. 9996
ALL RAEETIAlGS dtlII,L BE HELD IAI THE EAGLE COUNTY gU1LpING - 5ap BROADWAY, EAQLE - pR OIHERWtSE N07ED>
THIS AOEPdDA IS pRpVIpEp fOR INFO(iMATlO1dAL PURPOSES ONLY - q(,L 71lAES ARE APPRQXIMq7F,
7HE 6{WD UIfiULE IR1 9ESSION &PAY CUWSIDER O7HF-R ITEMS VHAT AI:E BRQUdNY BEFOR$ IT.
1
~
~e e
e4
TOWN OF vAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970 479-2100
FAX-970-479-2157
MED9A ADV9S062V
iViay 24, 1995
Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information Office
VAIL TOWN COUIVC9L 641G6iLBGHTS FOR MAX 23
Work Sessuon Bruefs
Council members present: Johnston, Lapin (arrived later), Ostertoss, Shearer,
Steinberg, Strauch --Vail Commons Evaluation Discussion
During a joint meeting with members of the Vail Commons Task Force, the Council
(Lapin did not attend fhis discussion due to a conflict of interest) reviewed a
comparative analysis of the three remaining mixed-use development proposals under
consideration for the town-owned Vail Commons property. The analysis prompted
additional questions by the Council and Task Force, including the pros and cons
surrounding future ownership of the property; the economic feasibility of two competing
grocery stores in West Vail; day care and employee housing demands created by the
development; quality and affordability of the housing components; and traffic volume
impacts. The three development proposats, narrowed from a field of seven, include: 1) a plan to locate City Markef on the site, plus additional commercial space, a day
care facility and affordable housing units; 2) a plan for redevelopment of the West Vail
iVlall, redevelopment of Safieway at its existing site and development on the Vail
Commons site, including affordable housing, additional commercial space and a
community pavilion; and 3) a proposal to build a new Safeway on the Vail Commons site with redevelopment of the existing Safeway site, plus affordable housing,
commercial space and a community center. The issues will be discussed again by the
Council in late June as it moves forward in the selection process. The 6.6 acre
property was purchased by the towrn in 1993 for $3.2 million. For more information,
contact Andy Knudtsen in the Community Development Department at 479-2138.
--Rezoning of Vail Recreation Distric4 Niaintenance Facility
After reviewing criteria for a rezoning request from the Vail Recreation District, the
Council aufihorized staff to move forward with the public process regarding VRD's
proposal to change zoning of the golf course maintenance facility at 1278 Vail Valley
Drive from Natural Area Preservation District to General Use District. The zoning
change request is the second step in a three-step process that could enable the distric4
to apply for a conditional use permit to remodel the facility. The site is used for storage
(more)
:
Council Highlights/Add 1
of fuel, equipment and various supplies used to maintain the golf course. An ordinance
for the zoning change will be considered for first reading by the Council on June 6. For
more information, contact Russell Forrest in the Community Development Department
at 479-2138.
--Land Use Plan Changes The Council continued its review of a plan to revise the town's land use plan by
changing the land use designation on about 20 town owned properties. Local resident
Hermann Staufer received support from the Council in asking that a town-owned parcel
near his home remain as open space in the land use designation rather than leaving
the possibility open for subdividing the land with potential development on a portion of
the property. The Council will consider a resolution at its June 6 evening meeting to.
adjust the land use plan as it relates to those 20 parcels. For more information, contact
Russell Forrest. in the Community Development Department at 479-2138.
- --Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) Report
During an update on the May 22 PEC meeting, the Council voted 4-2 (Johnston,
Shearer against) to call-up PEC approval of a conditional use permit to allow for an
automatic teller machine to be located at 244 Wall Street. The applicant is FirstBank of
Vail. Council members voiced safety concerns regarding skier access to the mountain
and the potential for litter. The measure will be reviewed by the Council at its June 6
evening meeting. For details, contact Jim Curnutte in the Community Development
Department at 479-2138.
--Design Review Board (DRB) Report
During an update on the May.17 DRB meeting, the Council was notified of DRB
approval of the Pulis/Golf Course bridge replacemenUwidening project. Construction
could start as early as August. For details, contact Greg Hall, town engineer, at
479-2160.
--Vail Valley Foundation Request for Fence Improvement at Ford Amphitheater
' The Council voted 6-0 to allow the Vail Valley Foundation to proceed through the
planning process to construct a six-foot, wrought iron crowd control fence at the Gerald
R. Ford Amphitheater, which is located on town property. For more information, contact
George Ruther in the Community Development Department at 479-2138. _
--Bid Awards
, The Council voted 6-0 to approve a bid of $1.03 million from B&B Construction for the
golf course street reconstruction project. Also, the Council voted 6-0 to approve a bid
of $105,000 from CAntinental West for walkway improvements at the Bald Mountain
underpass. For construction details, contact Greg Hall, town engineer, at 479-2160.
--Regional Transportation
In preparation for the June 6 Transportation Summit, the Council continued its
(more)
.
Council Highlights/Add 2
discussion on regional 4ransportation issues. The outcome of yesterday's discussion
included: an interest in keeping public funding for recreational paths separate from
public financing of a regional bus system; support for a separate broad-based authority
to develop and operate a regional bus system; flexibility in working writh other entities to
create a regional system; support for continued operation of existing community bus
senrices separate and distinct from the.regional system (although the systems would
need to provide a connection to the regional system); a commitment to help fund
existing bus routes in the near term; and support for a conservative financing plan for a
long term regional system. There was also interest in discussion of a sales tax which
might sunset after a period of time and flexibility expressed with regard 4o rebates or
fair share formulas. The Council will discourage moving forward with a transportation
tax question on the November 1995 ballot, noting that much more work should be done
to define an operational plan before asking voters to approve a possible sales tax.
--Dowd Junction Bike Path
The Council asked Town Manager Bob IVicLaurin to work with the state and other
entities to coordinate opening of the Dowd Junction bike path with completion of the
Fiighway 6 widening project to improve safety along the route. For details, contact
iVlcLaurin at 479-2105.
--Sales Tax on Animal Prescription Drugs
The Council heard a request from Dr. Sheila Fitzpatrick, a local veterinarian, to exempt
drugs prescribed to animals from the town's sales tax. Fitzpatrick argued the drugs she
prescribes to animals are the same prescribed to human beings and therefore should
be exempt from tax. The 4own's sales tax code exempts prescription drugs for humans
and taxes drugs prescribed 4o animals. The impact to the town was estimated
yesterday at from $50 to $200 annually. Council members denied the request to
amend the sales tax code. Othervvise, Council members said, it would appear to be
granting a special privilege. For more information, contact Sally Lorton in the Finance
Department at 479-2125.
Information Update
--Calendar information: the Town of Vail will host a reception for the 10th Mountain
Division Reunion on iViay 28 at 4:30 p.m. at the Vail Village Inn; Vail Police will hold an
auction of unclaimed property from 1 to 4 p.m. June 2 in the TOV Council Chambers.
The {o4tery winner of coins collected from the town's fountains is "Pennies for
F'laygrounds" at Red Sandstone School. Schoolchildren will begin counting and
wrapping the coins this week. For more information contact, Assistant Town iVianager
Pam Brandmeyer af 479-2113.
Council members were invited to attend the June 12 meeting of the Planning and
Environmental Commission to hear a presentation from Vail Associates on the Golden
'Peak redevelopment project. (more)
.
Council Highlights/Add 3
The Covered Bridge is scheduled to be reinstalled this week.
--Other
The Council directed Town Attorney Tom Moorhead to prepare an ordinance which
would require all employee housing units in the town to adhere to all ordinances, rules
and reguiations in effect as may be amended from time to time. For more information,
contact Moorhead at 479-2107.
At the suggestion of Mayor Osterfoss, the Council agreed to explore a formula which
: would require employee housing units within commercial development projects based
on the percentage of full time equivalent employees associated with the project.
Also, the Council agreed to pursue an idea by Merv Lapin in which residents of
employee housing units, such as the future Vail Commons project, could be exempt
from franchise fees collected by utilities to reduce the cost of housing. Although such a
an exemption appears to be minimal, Council members said the concept is appealing.
--Council Reports .
Jan Strauch indicated -the Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau had asked about
the status of efforts to create state legislation to form a local tourism district. Town
Manager Bob McLaurin said he is working to arrange a visit by the area's legislative
delegation to pursue the matter.
The Council reiterated its interest in consolidating newspaper boxes on public property
in the commercial core areas and asked Town Manager Bob McLaurin to share an
action plan at its next meeting.
# # #
Upcoming Discussion Topics
June 6 Work Sessron
Regional Transportation
Liquor Board Interviews
June 6 Evening Meeting
Environmental Quality Award Ceremony.
First reading rezoning ordinance of VRD maintenance facility
Second reading water district ordinance Second reading animal control ordinance
Resolution on land use plan Resolution to adopt TOV non-point source water quality plan
Appointment of Liquor Board members
(more)
.
6
Council Highlights/Add 4
June 13 Work Session
Community Development Department Budget Session
Update on Eagle Mine
250 ordinance discussion
Outdoor display of goods
. o
1NORK SES510N FOLLOW-UP
FSNOW Q~DEST9ONS ~ FOLLONI-fl1P S09.~DT90NS
STORAGE LAND Current tliscussions presume a decision in 6 months (April '95). VA has
s
LARRYIBOB McL: Immediately pursue purchase from VA asked to dump snow at ihis location. Because of our environmen4al
PURCHASE of current snow storage site, as well as anotfier 10 acres liabiliiy, this request was denied. Larry, Bob, and Tom are follouving up.
adjacent to the west. Joe Macy vuas in to see Larry again this week. Has taken the lease to VA
attorneys to address environmental liability issue.
02/95 CHUCK ANDERSON YOl1TH PAUUJAN: Contact VRD about moving up the selection Met uuith all principals/headmaster/and Superin4endent of Schools on
AlNARD process to allouv awards to be given tluring May PRIOR to 3123195, antl will continue to follow up on this auspicious beginning to
(request: Strauch) graduaiion or to be included with the graduation create a new scholarship program to replace ihis previous avuard.
ceremonies.
01124 iOTIq MOUNTAIN DIVISIiJN PAiN Coordinate a reception, possibly in conjunction wiih The Town will host a reception ai ihe VVI from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
RECEPTION Colorado Ski Museum (Lucy Babcock) for May 28, 1995. Sunday, May 28, 1995.
Coordinate paitnerships in this effort wIVVF, VA, UFW, etc.
02/07 "NEED LIST" FOR '99 ALL: Finalize list with departments and Council for Following the 2114195 council work session discussion Bob and Mero met
CHAMPIONSHIPS presentation to Siate. with VUF to review their needs for the '99 Championships. We are
compiling a combined list to discuss with Larry Kallenberger of Dept. of
Local Aifairs. This meeiing will likely be held in approximately one month.
02/29 CHILDCARE/JOHANNES BOB: Johannes has expressed an interest in Steve will follow up w/ABC Sctiool (liolly Bukacek) since ABC is currently
FAESSLER providing/maintaining/subsitlizing childcare for the "general considering an expansion oi their current facilities. Paul will contact
public" at the Moun4ain Bell site. Follow up on this inquiry. Johannes to deiermine how serious his original offer was.
L_04/04 TOURISNi DISTRICT BOB/TOM: Follow-up with appropriate process and Jack Taylor will call back after he's set up meeting with Dave Wattenberg.
(request: Strauch) legislation to promoie and create a Tourism District.
May 19, 1995 Page 1 oi 1
- Gu5 5'0 3• 1~5 ~ 1
4VAIL
TO1~1 O75 South Frontage Road Deparnnent of Comntuniry Development
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21381479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
AAEAAORANDUwfl
TO: The Vail Town Council
FROM: Andy Knudtsen, Staff and the Consultant Team ~
DATE: Status of Vail Commons Evaluation
SUBJECT: May 23, 1995
At your work session on Tuesday May 23, we will be prepared to give you an overview of the
status of our evaluation of the three Vail Commons teams. With participation from Jen VUright
and Diana Donovan as Task Force representatives, we completed intervievus with each of the
teams on May 17th. We have used the time since the interviews to further organize the
information that we have received and this information is summarized in the attachments and will
form the basis for our discussion with the Town Council.
There are several key points that we wish to make before discussion occurs. First, we are
. recommending that a decision not be made at this time and that no formal or informal indication
of Town Council preferences be made. Rather, this is a work session and, as explained belouv,
evaluations are still in progress which should be finalized before a decision is indicated.
Information provided in the attached matrix is preliminary and will be verified shortiy.
. Second, we will not have Dan Guimond, our economic consultant, at the meeting. UVe are
working with Dan to evaluate the sales tax and operating issues associated with one or two
supermarkets. This evaluation is not yet complete; we vuill be providing Council with findings as
soon as they are available.
Third, we are in the process of checking references and clarifying various figures included in this
summary packet. As a result, all information should be considered preliminary. It will be
finalized prior to your next meeting concerning the Vail Commons development team selections.
VVe look foruvard to discussing the findings from the process to date and will ask for your direction
concerning questions on issues to be explored prior to your next formal discussion (currently
scheduled for June 20th).
F:\everyone\andy\co m mons\52395
Pros andl Cons ~eveRopment Team Proposals
Based upon interviews of candidates May 16-17 and evaluation of site plans and submittal packages
TEAM
Reputation, experience with similar types of real estate development, anticipated ease of working relationship,
financial solidity, ability to secure private financing, local knowledge, long-term commitment to the project and to
the Vail community, property management capabilities and approach, apparent receptivity to public process, etc.
DESIGN/PLAN
Quality of the site plan in terms of building scale, density, open space, screening and linkages; quality of the
neighborhood created on the site; quality of the azchitecture relative to building costs and styles appropriate to a
mountain environment; appropriateness of the amenities and mix of housing types for long-term residents;
relationships with adjacent uses; pedestrian/bike linkages; traffic and other impacts; adequacy of parking for
residential and commercial uses, visibility of parking and lazger commercial buildings, quality of open space, etc.
FINANCING AND PROJECT COSTS
Feasibility and attractiveness of financing methods proposed, affordability of proposed housing price ranges,
credibility of estimated building and sitework costs, etc.
BENEFITS TO (AND CONTROL BY) TOWN OF VAIL
Extent to which Town retains ownership of the land, TOV control over commercial uses, assurance that housing
units will remain affordable, costs borne by TOV, financial retum to the Town, "ripple" effects, etc.
OFTUS PROP/ .
TEAM
Pro Con
1. Loftus: good retail experience, good reputation, has 1. Lofius and Mulhern: not much affordable housing
done other development projects with Safeway; has experience.
been interested in Vail and in this site for a long time. 2. Mulhern: more experience in urban retail than
2. Mulhern (architect): reputation for competence, mountain resort building types.
quality; retail experience; has worked with Safeway 3. Housing team references are being checked.
before. 4. Too many players needing to earn their retum in too
3. Kendali: Vail resident many ways (Young: consulting fees?; Kendall: condo
4. Most key players seem easy to work with. sales commissions; Loftus: retail management and
leasing and development of old Safeway site; AHDC:
housing management fees)
5. Not clear whether Loftus plans long-term involvement.
6. Management of housing element not proposed to be
local.
7. No commitment yet from Safeway. Safeway's
guidance so far has been relatively conventional with
regard to the design of the facility and they were not
available at the interviews to discuss specific intentions
or levels of interest.
dDESgGN/Pg,AsN
Pro Con
1. Reasonable mix of housing units. 1. Of the three plans, this is the most urban and most
2. Public open space in landscaped areas and rooftop commercially intensive in appearance. The site plan
courtyards has been improved over the team's initial seems rather rigid and axial, and much of the open
proposal by the introduction of structured parking for space is more hard-edged than soft. (To some extent,
the units over the Safeway. this can be fixed during the design process.)
3. Frontage along Chamonix is good. The housing 2. Retail parking is the minimum required for commercial
screens the neighborhood from Safeway parking, lights space (3 spaces per 1000 SF) and may be inadequate
and noise. There is limited vehicle access to the for a supermarket (Safeway wanted 5 spaces per 1000
project from Chamonix. The Safeway back-door is a SF if they could get it).
vast improvement. 3. Residential parking is also tight, especially for visitors.
4. Most units on the site are buffered from the Frontage Parking for units over retail is in the structure at the
Road (except the south end units). west end, faz from many of the units, and is mingled
5. Townhouses have their own garages. with retail traffic. There aie fewer structured (and
6. Good connections with Vail das Schone for pedestrians therefore hidden) pazking spaces in this plan than in the
and cars. others. .
7. Offers good possibility to rearrange parking on all 4. Grocery loading area may be inadequate, and requires
properties along the Frontage Road so that cars can tuming maneuvers on Vail das Schone property.
move more freely among them and so that there is 5. Elevation sketches show no retail signage or lighting
greater opportunity for shared parking in peak periods. and landscaping in excess of what will likely be
8. Vaii Commons plaza and the playground/park offer the planted. Trees in the large pazking lot, in particulaz, '
potential for good new neighborhood public spaces. are impractical for snow removal. No space is shown
9. Reduction in commercial squaze footage on the old for snow storage, which could make the parking
Safeway site permits commensurate reduction in the numbers even more constrained.
- size of the parking lot. 6. The conventional siting demanded by the supermarket
, represents a significant extension of the pattern of large
surface parking lots along the Frontage Road. The
small pad buildings and transit center at the Frontage
Rd. edge may not offer sufficient screening to mitigate
the visibility of the relatively large area of asphalt.
7. The arrangement of condo units is fairly linear. It will
take more effort to get natural south light into more of
the units.
8. Feasibility of rerenting and reusing the old Safeway
building has not been tested. Visually, it may be
preferable to start over with the store than to revise it.
9. Not sure all the cars going to Safeway can be handled
with just one driveway entry off the Frontage Road.
&'INANCINNG AND 1PRO,bEC'd' COSTS
Pro Con
1. Hard costs at $70/SF inay not buy the quality we want.
' Landscape budget probably inadequate to create the
intensity of screening and vegetation we would like,
especially with the much higher cost of landscaping
over structures.
2. Use of short-term revenue bonds for construction
financing ads another step to the process; complicates
negotiations.
3. Project economics on the Commons is dependent on
linkage with development on the old Safeway site, and
is therefore dependent op the developer's ability to
. conclude a deal with Safeway.
4. Financing capacity and equity sources are not as clear
as those of the other two teams.
2
]B]ENlEFffTS TO THIF TOWN
Pro Con
1. Developer will provide and manage a community 1. Proposal asks TOV to sell land under condos.
room. 2. Units (36) on old Safeway site are market rate.
2. Neighborhood playground on site. 3. TOV control over commercial tenant selection is
3. Transit center. , unlikely on either site.
4. Ripple effect: redevelopment of the old Safeway site. 4. TOV loses the potential to hold the commercial center
5. Developer pays for street improvements on both the as an appreciating asset.
Commons and Safeway sites. 5. Unclear at this time the relationship between Safeway
and developer.
6. Previously existing Safeway site was to be deeded to
TOV and a portion of Vail Commons site was to be
deeded to Safeway. At this time, Town involvement in
' the Safeway site would be limited.
CITY . RKET'PROPO .
'II']EAM[
Pro Con
1. Warner: local resident, experienced builder of quality, 1. References of team members are being checked.
reasonably affordable housing. 2. Some indications that this team are relatively rigid in
2. The primary developer (City Market) is also the their approach. They have done a large amount of
contractor, the financing source for the commercial evaluation and there aze now more "givens" in their
space, and the major tenant. The deal is simple, the approach.
structure and organization seem straightforward, and 3. Who will manage the housing component?
the piayers are committed to long-term involvement.
3. City Market has experience running good quality stores
in other resort communities and understands staffing
needs.
4. City Market designs its stores to match the market and
character of individual locations ("micromarketing").
5. All team members have worked in the Vail Valley and
understand local issues.
DIESIGN/]PILAN
Pro Con
1. Generally agreed that this is the best site plan and has 1. Wall along the Vail das Schone side is an obstacle to
the greatest potential to create a strong sense of good car and pedestrian linkage.
neighborhood and community. 2. CDOT may not allow the project 3 curb cuts along the
2. Architectural quality depicted graphically seems closest Frontage Road.
to reality for the per SF costs projected. 3. Ped/bike connections east-west through the site could
3. Of the 3 plans, the commercial space and associated be stronger (easily fixed).
parking aze least visible in this plan. T'he plan will 4. Some grocery store pazking is, visible from Chamonix.
greatly improve the character of the Frontage Road 5. Will vehicular traffic generated by two supermarkets be
along the property and provides a good ternunus to the significantly higher than with one grocery plus smaller
commercial strip. retail?
4. Plan offers the greatest number of parking spaces, with
a large percentage underground.
5. Plan offers a reasonable number and mix of units.
Number could be increased slightly if desired.
6. No traffic impact on Chamonix. .
3
,
]E7aVAP1CING AIVIID PROJEC'g' COSTS
Pro Con
1. Commercial component will be paid for by developer 1. Total cost of units to buyers is still high after inclusion
without financing. of all costs and monthly fees.
2. The proposal accepts that the project will be built 2. Landscape budget probably too low to achieve the
entirely on leased land. effect suggested in the drawings.
3. Dwelling units to be privately financed; no public 3. Lease payments may disproportionately burden
sources of funds sought. residential azea relative to the commercial area.
BlENElF7[7CS TO THE TOWN
Pra Con
1. Sales tax receipts estimated by proponent to be higher 1. Much controversy over the idea of two adjacent
in a two-store scenario than in any other mixed-use grocery stores. Is this the best use of the land? Would
scheme. Safeway stay in business? If it eventually succumbs,
2. Strong market rationale for two stores as way to stop • what would become of its property?
the leakage of grocery sales to Avon and elsewhere. 2. The ripple effect on neighboring commercial properties
3. Day care center (although it probably needs to be larger is not as immediate or direct (rather, it comes through
than 40 kids). increased sales taxes).
4. Developer commits not to change deed restriction even
if sales of units are slow.
5. Strength of City Market as a store operator.
6. TOV retains ownership and control of the entire Commons site.
7. No rental units (could also be a negative), except for
City Market employees.
8. 12 employee units for use by City Market is a good
precedent for the Town.
9. Developer indicates willingness to work towazd
satetlite grocery operation and creative delivery
concepts.
. . . ROPO .
T]EAM
Pro Con
1. The team represents strong financial condition. 1. Architect for Vail Commons has limited experience
2. Gart is already locally involved. with affordable housing.
3. Development team indicates they will have a long-term 2. Gart/Elkins appear to lack experience as a developer
commitment to the project. and has no experience building (as opposed to simply
acquiring, owning and managing) afforda6le housing.
3. Relationship with Safeway is thorny; Gart has not
gotten a firm commitment yet from Safeway to
participate in the project.
4
n
e
DIFi.SIG~/PLAN
Pro Con
1. No traffic is added to Chamonix from the Commons 1. Site plan for the Commons is weak: no common open
project. space, no pedestrian connections, no cohesive approach
2. Facade improvements to existing Gart and Safeway to landscaping.
structures. 2. Serious doubts that the architectural character sketches
3. Removal of berm between the two existing properties in the proposal can be achieved at an affordable cost.
will improve the flow of vehicular circulation between 3. Questions about the appropriateness of single-family
them. housing and the cost on the Commons site.
4. T'he land consumed by the 18 single-family lots greatly
increases the effective density and decreases the
available open space for the remainder of the units,
leading to questions about the livability of those units.
. 5. Layout of condo units above the commercial space on .
the Commons is not shown; floorplans in the proposal
are not suited for a rooftop situation on a building 65'
in depth.
6. Car access to Commons single-family units is through
much denser townhouse area and is likely to be
congested at the central rotary.
7. Question whether the site plan and building concept for
the Gart/Safeway sites could get approved on its own:
facade along Chamonix is long and institutional in
current elevation sketches.
8. 107 under-structure parking spaces access the existing
two sites from the Chamonix side.
FINA1+1CdNG E,ND PRO,YIECB' COS7C5
Pro Con
1. Project economics do not depend on tax credit 1. Unit costs quoted do not support the level of
financing. architectural character depicted in the sketches (but
2. Developer's current net worth simplifies obtaining proponent sounded flexible on almost every aspect of
private financing; could mortgage their other properties the proposal).
that are presently debt-free. 2. Cost of some housing proposed does not fit a priority
3. Flexibility of team to work toward modifying the plan. segment within the Vail affordable housing market.
BENEYITS TO TBIE T0WN
Pro Con
1. Two existing sites aze included in the development l. May not be willing to put commercial space on leased
proposal: a significant ripple effect on the West Vail land.
commercial strip. 2. May not be willing to deed-restrict housing units on the
2. Smaller commercial component, divided into multiple two existing redevelopment sites, (West Vail and
smaller spaces, may attract more local businesses. Safeway).
3. Some aspects of plan are beneficial to Town regardless 3. Town not likely to have any control over the selection
of Vail Commons outcome. Want to encourage the of retail tenants.
Gart/Elkins team to continue integrated planning and
redevelopment.
4. Only proposal identifying office space as a proposed
use.
5
a
cCity I~arket Ga~t Lofftus
Companies Deve?opments
1. Density
Number of Dwelling Units
Vail Commons Site
For-sale 53 78 57
Rental 12 0 16
Total 65 78 73
Allowed Density per Zoning Code
. 78 d.u. (Plus Type III EHLJ's)
GRFA proposed on Vail Commons 67,900 90,700 68,910
GRFA allowed per zoning code -
71,874 sq. ft.
Number of Dwelling Units -0-
Off-site 36 36
Note: 36 "off-site" Note: 36 "off-site"
units may not be units may not be
deed restricted. deed restricted.
2. Net Add'1 Square Footage For
all Properties in the West Vail
Area
Retail or Restaurant 5,000 28,800 31,000
Grocery 55,000 20,000 19,000
Office -0- 10,000 -0-
Total 60,000 58,000 50,000
3. Budget for Vail Commons
Com. and multi fam. housing 8.9 4.1 6.2
For-sale housing 6.7 10.2 6.3
Total 15.8 14.3 12.5
1
,
a
CIlty Mau-ket Gart Loftus
eCoanpaaies Deve?oprnents
' 4. Return to the Town from Vail C.
Residential Fee $ 80,520 per year $2,044,500 one time $ 427,500 one rime
Retail and Office $100- 150,000 per veaz $ 825,000 one time 138,000 per year
Total $180,520 $2,869,500 $ 565,500
Present Value Calculations (5%)
Residential Fee $1,237,790 30 years $2,044,500 $ 427,500
Retail and Office $2.021.979 30 years S 825.000 $2.121.398 30 years
Total $3,259,768 $2,869,500 $2,548,898
5. Fees for Vail Commons
Developer Fees 0% or $0.00 3.5% or $480,727 4.2% or $400,000
Real Estate Commission 2% or $133,198 5% or $630,000 6.0% or $403,200
For-sale housing profit $10,000 per or $18,000 per or -0-
Per dwelling unit/Total $530,000 $1,385,966
Bond Issuance S0.00 $0.00
Total Fee $663,918 $2,496,693 $803,200
6, Calculations per square foot for
residential on Vail Commons
Construtuion cost (shell only) $ 74.22 $ 71.36 $ 70.00
Total Construction cost $112.50 $112.45 $114.76
7. Monthly Payment on a Typical 3 bedroom 3 bedrrom 3 bedrrom
Townhouse 1400 sq. ft. 1300 sq. ft. 1400 sq ft.
$160,000 $175,000 $170,000
Principal and Interest (io% doWn) $1107 $1211 $1176
Home owners association dues $ 132 $ 73
Land Rent 14 -0- -0-
Total $1379 $1284
8. Range of Sales Prices
Studio/Condominium $109,500 $ 89,0004135,000 $ 90,0004105,000
Townhouse $117,5004159,500 $140,000-$185,000 $120,0004170,000
Duplex/SingleFamily $157,500 $189,9004275,000
9. Site Coverage 123,000 99,261
2
,
Cflty Market Gart ILoftus
Coinpanaes DeveYoprnents
10. Commercial Parldng
Total Number 300 108 171
Number of Covered Spaces 170 0 0
Note: 50 spaces are Note: 46 spaces aze
structured for 2nd structured for 2nd
level condos. level residential
Ratio-- Spaces: Comm Sq Ft 1:200 1:296 1:350
11. Landscaping
Total Area 81,222 97,140
Total Budget $393,717.00
Amount allocated to plant $138,405
material and irrigation
12. Community Daycaze paid by $105,065 -0- $225,000
residential portion of project
13. Team Members Developer - City Developer - Tom Developer - Jim
Individuals/Role Market Gart and Steve Loftus
Contractor - Robert Elkins Contractor - Shaw
Warner Contractor - Construction
Architect - Mazk Colorado First Architect - M[ike
Donaldson Architects - Mulhern
Humphreys and Sales - Bob Kendalll
Pariners, Wyatt Housing - John
and Associates Young
Housing
Management -
Jonathan
Rose/AHDC ,
f:\everyone\andykommons\
matrix.620
3
q CITY MARkET GART COMPANIES LOFTUS DEVELOPMENTS
COSTS PSF COSTS PSF COSTS PSF
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Hard Costs 4,417,550 66% 74.22 6,472,250 63% 71.36 3,838,100 61% 70.00
Site improvements
Landscaping 212,000 3% 3.56 103,804 1% 1.14 100,000 2% 1.82
Parking 39,456 <1 % 0.44
Utilities 95,400 1% 1.60 413,104 4% 4.55 •
Walks & Paths 10,750 0% 0.18 18,225 <1% 0.20
Signage 12,000 <1% 0.13
Curb & Gutter 5,813 <1% 0.06
Roads 116,600 2% 1.96 43,594 <1% 0.48
Excavation 67,140 1 % 0.74
Lighting 9,000 <1 % 0.10
Total 434,750 6% 7.30 712,136 7% 7.85 100,000 2% 1.82
Soft Costs
Architecture & Engineerin 280,900 4% 4.72 247,500 2% 2.73 188,690 3% 3.44
Permits & Tap Fees 278,250. 4% 4.67 400,000 4% 4.41 399,000 6% 7.28
Legal/ Accounting/ Ins 84;184 1% 1.41 97,500 1% 1.07 44,500 1% 0.81
Sales Commission 133,918 2% 2.25 500,000 5% 5.51 403,200 6% 7.35
Construction Interest 212,000 3% 3.56 260,000 3% 2.87 330,000 5% 6.02
Developer Fees 530,000 8% 8.90 353,636 3% 3.90 400,000 6% 7.30
Misceflaneous 0 56,962 1% 1.04
General Conditions 127,200 2% ' 0
Total 1,646,452 25% 27.66 1,858,636 18% 20.49 1;822,352 29% 33.24
Other
Community Center 105,065 2% 1.77 0 225,000 4% 4.10
Underground Parking 135,000 1% 1.49
Gazebo 15 000 <1% 0.17
Total 1 5, 5 % 1.77 150,000 1% 175 225,550 4% 4.1
Contingency 92,061 1% 1.55 982,136 10% 10.83 307,048 5% 5.60
Offsite Improvements .
Relocate Water Line L 0 24,375 <1% 0.27 0
Total Froject 6 695 678 1 112.50 10,199,535 100% 112.45 6 292 500 100% 114.76
Total Square Footage 59,519 90,700 54,830
Total Cost Per Square Feet 112.50 112.45 114.76
COMMBUD.WK4 Page 1 05/23/95
,
a
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development
DATE: March 27, 1995
SUBJECT: VRD request to change the zoning from the Natural Area Preseroation District to the
General Use District for the Vail Golf Course flAaintenance Facility located at 1278 Vail
Valley Drive, Parcel E Vail Valley 7th Filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District Staff: Russell Forrest V. 9NTFiODl9CTB0N
The Vail Recreation District is requesting that the zoning designation for the Golf Course Maintenance
facility be changed from the fVatural Area Preservation District to the General Use District. This is the
second step, in a three-step process, that could enable the District to apply for a conditional use permit to
remodel the facility. This maintenance facility is currently a legal non conforming use on property that is
zoned fVatural Area Preservation (fVAP). The use of the site is not consistent with the zoning (the only
permitted use in NAP is nature preserve) and has existed on the site since 1966. The site is used for
storage of fuel, equipment, and various supplies used to maintain the golf course. The maintenance
operation includes 25 seasonal and part-time employees. The reason for this request includes the
fo!lowing:
1) VRD would like to make improvements to the existing building and landscaping.
2) Existing underground storage tanks need to be replaced with above ground storage tanks
because of new Environmental Protection Agency and State regulations.
3) VRD wrants to install a wash wrater recycling system to reuse water used in cleaning equipment.
The parcel is approximately 2.2 acres (95,832 sq. ft.) and encompasses a portion of the golf course, Vail
Valley Drive, and the existing golf course maintenance facility (See attachment 1). The existing site
coverage on the property is approximately 4,538 square feet or nearly 5%. There is also a red avalanche
hazard area on the south portion of the property and a blue avalanche hazard directly south of the existing
building (See attachment 2). The Towrn of Vail owns ihe property which was recently acquired from the
Forest Seroice in 1994. As part of the open space zoning changes that Town staff is working on, this site
was identified as needing to be rezoned to General Use which would allow for a maintenance facility as a
conditional use.
This application will focus on(y on the criteria for changing the zoning on the site. If the proposed zoning
change is approved, then the VRD could then apply for a conditional use permit. In the General Use
District, the PEC is given the responsibility of determining the development standards for the property. This
will be done as a third step, if and when the District would like to formally submit an application for a
conditional use permit which would consider site and landscape design. Any improvements to the exterior
of the facility, other than maintenace, would require a conditional use permit that would involve determining
the development standards (listed below) for the site.
II. EXPLANATIOPV OF ZOPIING CATEGORIES
The VRD is proposing to change the zoning from Natural Area Presenration to General Use. Zoning
identifies uses permitted by right and conditional uses that an Applicant has to receive approval from the
PEC. Attachment 3 identifies the permitted and conditional uses for each District. The following is a brief
description of the NAP and GU districts.
Natural Area Preservation District: This district is intended to protect sensitive natural areas such
as wetlands, riparian areas, wildlife habitat, and high hazard areas. The only permitted use in this
district is nature preserve. Trails are allowed as a conditional use. This is the most restrictive
zone district in the Town of Vail.
General Use District: This district is intended to provide sites for public and quasi-public uses. The
general use district is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of
quasi-public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed to meet the
needs of residents and visitors to Vail. The permitted uses include passive outdoor recreation and
pedestrian/bike paths. There are a wide variety of conditional uses for this district, e.g., hospitals,
schools, maintenace facilities, parking structure. Since there is such a variety of uses possible in
the district, the PEC must determine development standards for each property zoned general use.
These standards include:
A. Lot area nd site dimensions;
B. Setbacks
C. Building height;
D. Density control; .
E. Site coverage
, F. Landscaping and site development
G. Parking and loading.
The Town code (18.36.050) states that development standards shall be proposed by the applicant
as part of a conditional use permit application. Site specific development standards shall be
determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission during the review of the conditional
use request.
III. CRITERIA FOR A ZONIPIG CHANGE:
1) Is the existing zoning suitab0e with existing land use on the si4e and adjacent land use?
The existing zoning is not suitable for the existing site. The maintenance facility has been located on the
site since 1966. This property was annexed into the Town with a number of other properties in 1982.
These properties were then zoned Greenbelt Natural Open Space(now called Natural Area Preseroation).
A maintenance facility is clearly not consistent with the purpose statement, permitted uses, or conditional
uses of the Natural Area, Preservation District. The Golf Course Maintenance facility, as indicated by its
name provides for the maintenance of the surrounding golf course which has a significant positive affect on
value af surrounding homes. This facility needs to be located in close proximity to the golf course and is
certianly consistant with golf. If the facility is adequatly maintained and screened, it should not negatively
impact adjacent home owners.
tl -
4
2) I3 4he dB4'11eP1dme81t pPeber9Y9ff9g a C06EV@I'E98n4, dvorkable reiationship with Iand uses consis4ent uvit9a
muaaacapa@ o@xgectades?
The amendment does not prevent a convenient workable relationship writh land uses consistent with
municipal objectives. This is a legal non-conforming use which is important to maintain a valuable summer
attraction - golf. Improving summer recreation and maintaining structures and facilities in good working
order are both municipal objectives stated in the Town of Vail Land Use Plan on page 6.
3) Does the regoning provide for ghe growt6a of ara order6y, diable comrraunity?
This project will not negatively or positively affect community growrrth. The rezoning will allow the
maintenance facility to make needed improvements to improve operations, facility aesthetics, and to protect
the environment.
The Town has historically asked that redevelopment proposals involving a Special Development District or
the General Use District provide employee housing. Providing housing is a major goal of the Town in
maintaining a viable community. Staff wrould ask that a single Type 3 EHU be considered for the
redevelopment at the time a conditional use permit is applied for by the applicant.
4) Is the change cons6sten4 wiSh 4he Land lise Plan?
This proposed amendment would be in concert with the Land Use Plan's goals. A goal of the Land Use
Plan on page 6 is to protect the quality of the environment. A major reason for the VRD's request is to
make improvements to its fuel storage which will protect water quality and prevent soil contamination. The
VRD also would like to create a vuash facility for vehicles and equipment that would recycle used water.
Another goal of the plan states: °The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible." Currerrtly the VRD can do basic maintenance on its' existing facility as a nonconforming use but
cannot make significant improvements. Also several goals state that the Town should improve summer
recreational opportunities. The Golf Course maintenance facility is a critical element in the operation of the
Vail Golf Course which is a valuable recreational draw to the community in the summer.
VN. ST,4FF RECOAAAAENDAT10N:
Staff recommends that the zoning be changed for the Vail Golf Course maintenance facility from IVatural
Area Preservation to General Use. The General Use zone district would be consistent vuith the use of the site and allow the VRD to make needed improvements to the site which would allow them to improve the
aesthetics of the facility and protect the environment through improved containment of fuel. To amend the
zoning for this property, the PEC would need to make a recommendation to the Town Council to pass an
ordinance which would amend the zoning designation for this property.
~
R' (,)S 5a 6• 95 l,'j,wuo 3
.
AAEMORANDl1M
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: fViay 8,1995
SUBJECT: A request Yo change the Vail Land Use Plan for 17 parcels of property throughout
the Town of Vail (see Attachment #1, located at Yhe end of this memorandum for
legal descriptions) from their current Land Use Plan designations to the Open
Space and Public/Semi-Public designations.
Applicant: Tovun of Vail Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest
Ve @NTRODUCT90N AP?D DESCFiOPTION OF TFiE PROPOSED L4PID USE PLAN
AiUIEiVDIWEfdTS
The Community Development Department is proposing to change the Vail Land Use Plan
designations of 17 properties throughout the Town of Vail (see Attachment #1). The reason for
proposing the changes is to address inconsistencies betvveen the actual use of these parcels
and their current designation on the Land Use Plan map. Of the 17 properties identified by staff
as being in need of amendment, 10 are currently designated Low Density Residential (LDR), four
are designated Medium Density Residential (MDR), one property has a designation of both
Resort Accommodations and Service (RAS) and Transition Area (TA), one property has a
designation of Transition Area (TA), and one property has a designation of Tourist Commercial
(TC). The staff is proposing to change the Land Use Plan designations of all of these
properties, with the exception of one (the Vail Interfaith Chapel property), 4o the Open Space
(OS) designation. The Vail tnterfaith Chapel property is proposed to receive the Land Use Plan
designation of Public/Semi-Public (PSP). The Land Use Plan defines the seven land use
categories being discussed in fihis memorandum as follows:
Lowr Density Residential (LDR) - this category includes single family detached homes and
two family dwelling units. Density of development within this category would rypically not
exceed three struc4ures per buildatile acre. Also within this category would be private
recreation facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools and clubhouses for the use of
residents in the area. Institutional/public uses permitted wrould include churches, fire
stations and parks and open space related facilities.
Medium Densitv Residential (MDR) - the medium density residential category includes
housing which would typically be designed as attached units with common walls.
' Densities in this category would range from three to fourteen dwelling units per buildable
acre. Additional types of uses in this category would include private recreation facilities,
private parking facilities and institutional/public uses such as parks and open space,
churches and fire stations.
Resort Accommodations and Senrice (RAS) - this area includes activities aimed at
accommodating the overnight and short term visitor to the area. Primary uses include
hatels, lodges, service stations and parking structures (with densities up to twenty-five
dwelling units or fifty accommodation units per buildable acre). These areas are oriented
~
)
.
toward vehicular access from I-70, with other support commercial and business services
included. Also allowed in this category, would be institutional uses and various municipal
uses.
Transition Area (TA) - the transition area designation applies to the area between
Lionshead and the Vail Village. The activities and site design of this area is aimed at
encouraging pedestrian flow through the area and strengthening the connection between
the two commercial cores. Appropriate activities include hotels, lodging and other tourist
oriented residential units, ancillary retail and restaurant uses, museums, areas of public
art, nature exhibits, gacdens, pedestrian plazas, and other types of civic and culturally
orientated uses, and the adjacent properties to the north. This designation would include
the right-of-way of West Meadow Drive and the adjacent properties to the north. -
Tourist Commercial (TCl - the tourist commercial designation is aimed at preserving
areas to accommodate commercial activities oriented toward the visitor to the area.
Activities which would be appropriate to this area include lodges, retail businesses and
offices, restaurants and personal service establishments. A high density of development
is suitable for the area, with the emphasis on the pedestrian. Vehicular access would be
limited to emergency and service requirements.
Open S ace (OS,) - passive recreation areas such as greenbelts, stream corridors and
drainageways are the types of areas in this category. Hillsides which were classified as
undevelopable due to high hazzards and slopes over 40% are also included within this
area. These hillside areas would still be allowed types of development permitted by
existing zoning, such as one unit per 35 acres, for areas in agricultural zoning. Also,
permitted in this area would be institutional/public uses.
Public/Semi-Public (PSP) - the public and semi-public category includes schools, post
office, water and sewer service and storage facilities, cemeteries, municipal facilities, and
other public institutions, which are located throughout the community to serve the needs
of residents.
The process being discussed at today's meeting does not involve the actual rezoning of any
properties within the Town of Vail. Rather, staff wishes to focus the discussion on the Land Use
Plan designation changes of the 17 properties identified on Attachment #1, and shown on the
accompanying maps. Staff believes that the current Land Use Plan designation of these
properties is not consistent with the goals and policies of the Town, their actual use, and/or their
existing zoning, and are therefore requesting approval of the changes indicated in the right hand
column of Attachment_#1.
Staff requests that the PEC discuss the proposed Land Use Plan changes and make a
recommendation regarding this application to the Town Council for their consideration at a
regular evening meeting, (currently scheduled for May 16, 1995). Upon approval of a resolution
authorizing the Land Use Plan changes, staff will immediately schedule a worksession with the PEC to discuss the proposed zone chanqes of approximately 60 properties throughout Town.
Thirteen of the 17 properties listed on Attachment #1 are owned by the Town of Vail. One of the
properties is owned by the Vail Religious Foundation and the remaining three are owned by Vail
, Associates, Inc. Staff has received verbal authorization to proceed with the proposed Land Use
Plan changes from these property owners.
2
,09. RAClCGROUPYD
On August 22, 1994, staff received approval to amend the text of Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and
iVatural Open Space District (GiVOS) and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District (PUD), of the Vail
ilAunicipal Code, and to create a new Chapter 18.33, Outdoor Recreation District (OR). The text
amendments to the GIVOS and PUD zone districts, and the creation of the neuu OR zone district
were the first step in a nro step process intended to insure that the uses allowed in these zone
districts are consistent with their purpose statements, and that properties throughout Town,
especially those with open space characteristics, are located in the appropriate zone district. An
initial revieuv revealed that approximately 60 properties (mostly Town owned properties) were in
need of rezoning.
It was always intended Yhat immediately following the adoption of fhe above mentioned text
amendments, staff would analyze numerous properties throughout Town to determine whether or
not the characteristics of each warrant their rezoning into, or out of, the three zone districts
previously mentioned. However, in conducting a detailed analysis of these properties, it was
discovered that many of the rezonings contemplated by staff would not comply with the current
Land Use Plan designations of the properties. It therefore became necessary to propose Land
Use Plan designation changes on approximately 17 of the 60 properties being researched prior to
proceeding with the aforementioned rezonings.
As indicated on the attached chart, all of the 17 properties to be discussed today have Land Use
Plan designations that would allow for varying degrees of residential development. Although
many of these properties coutd not be developed due to lack of access, extreme slopes, red
haiard avalanche, e4c., some of them (approximately 10) are readily developable. Staff was
concerned about proceeding with a process to apply more restrictive Land Use Plan designations
to these properties vuithout prior Town Council authorization. Therefore, on April 11, 1995 and
April 18, 1995 worksessions were held with the Town Council to discuss whether or not some of
the properties on the list at that time, should be removed. The Town Council, after conducting
site visits to the properties, removed tvdo properties, but kept the remainder on the list for PEC
review and recommendation.
0900 CR6TEROA T USED IN EVALUAT9N TFiIS PROPOSAL
Page 61 of Yhe Vail Land Use Plan identifies the arnendment process which would be used to
change the Plan, and accompanying map. The Plan states that the amendment process shall be
used to insure the Plan's effectiveness, with periodic updates to reflect current thinking and
changing market conditions. The process includes amendments which may be initiated in any of
the followring three ways:
A. By the Community Development Department B. By the PEC or Town Council
C. By the private sector
Proposed changes by any of the three above mentioned applicants requires demonstration as to
h0w condBtaons haee changed since ghe Plan was adopted, how the Plan is on error, -Qr hovv
the addition9 deoetBon oP change to the Plaw is in concert with the Plan in general.
3
v
The Vail Land Use Plan points out that the boundaries of the various land use categories
established on the plan map are general in nature and were not determined based on parcel-by-
parcel property boundaries. The Land Use Plan also points out that the constraint maps adopted
by the Town, which indicate geologic hazards, snow avalanche and floodplains, should also be utilized in conjunction with the Vail Land Use Plan during the review of any development
proposal.
Staff has reviewed the 17 properties proposed for Land: Use Plan designation changes and
compared them to the above listed criteria.. We have grouped many of the properties into the
same category, upon determining that they have similar features as compared to the Land Use
Plan amendment criteria. The following list demonstrates how each of the properties meet the
criteria necessary for changing their current Land Use Plan designations:
1. How have conditions changed since the Plan was adoQMd? Staff believes that with
regard to the following property, conditions have changed since the Plan was originally
adopted:
Reference #9. The Land Use Plan designation of this property is Low Density
Residential. Staff believes that this was the correct designation of the property (at the
tirne that it was placed on the entire neighborhood) due to the fact that Lot 20A was a
developable lot. Since that time however, Lot 20A has been donated to the Town of Vail
for the purpose of preserving it as permanent open space. It is staff's intention to change
the Land Use Plan designation of this property to Open Space and then down zone the
property from Primary/Secondary Residential to an open space zoning designation:
Therefore, staff believes that conditions have changed since the original Land Use Plan
designation of the lot was made.
2. Flow is the alan in error? - Staff believes that the following properties have current Land
Use Plan designations which were adopted in error, when considering the uses and/or
characteristics of a specific property that existed at the time each received iYs Land Use
Plan designation:
Reference #1. This tract of land was recently acquired from Consolidated Oil and Gas
and is located in a high hazard rockfall zone and a red hazard snow avalanche zone. The
property has no access from a public road. Staff believes when the Land Use Plan Map
identified the entire neighborhood as Medium Density Residential they did not specifically
consider the site constraints associated with this particular property, and therefore this
parcel received a residential Land Use Plan designation in error. The property is currently
zoned Agricultural and Open Space.
Reference #2. Similar to the parcel described in Reference #1 above, this unplatted
parcel of land has no access to a public road and is Iocated in the high haiard debris flow
and rockfall zones, as well as the red hazard snow avalanche zone. The property is
currently zoned Agricultural and Open Space. Staff believes that it was an error to give
this specific property a Land Use Plan designation of Low Density Residential.
Reference #3. This is the stream bed, and associated floodplain area, of Pitkin Creek
located between I-70 and Bighorn Road. It is also the site of the historic Circle K Ranch
house which is currently used as a bus shelter. The property is currently zoned
Agricultural and Open Space. For these reasons staff believes that it was an error to
4
apply the Medium Density Residential Land Use Plan designation to the property.
AlYhough 4here is a bus stop building located on this property, it is not a concern to staff to
change the Land Use Plan designation of the property to Open Space since "public uses"
are allouved in the Open Space land use designation.
Reference #4. Stream Tracts B and E, Vail Village 11 th Filing, were established on the
Final Plat for the purpose of providing for the uninterrupted flow of Booth Creek through
this subdivision. Although the Land Use Plan designation of tfiese tracts, as well as 4he
entire neighborhood, is Low Density Residential, it is an error to apply a Residential Land
Use designation to these specific tracts.
Reference #5. This property is located in a high hazard rockfall zone and is currently
zoned Agricultural and Open Space. Staff believes that due to the shape of this property,
it was intended to provide for an open space connection between the large open space
tract north of the subdivision (Tract A) and the Vail Mountain School property. Tract B
does not meet the minimum lot frontage and dimensional requirements for a developable
lot in any zone district in the Touvn of Vail, and also does not meeY the minimum lot size
requirement of 35 acres in the Agricultural and Open Space Zone District. For these
reasons staff believes that the current Land Use Plan designation of Low Density
Residential is in error. - Reference #6. This property is located in a high hazard debris avalanche zone, a
medium hazard rockfall zone and a snow avalanche influence zone. It is currently zoned
Primary/Secondary Residential and has a Land Use Plan designation of Low Density
Residential. Although it appears that the southern half of this property is accurately
described in the Land Use Plan, (similar to the residential development on either side),
staff believes that the upper portion of the lot should not have a residential Land Use Plan
designation and 4herefore the Land Use Plan map is in error.
Reference #7. Although these properties have a current Land Use Plan designation of
Low Density Residential, they are all zoned Agriculturat and Open space at this time.
These parcels are located in a medium hazard rockfall zone, high hazard debris
avalanche zone and a red snow avalanche zone. Their current zoning designation is
Agricultural and Open Space.
Reference #8. The Vail Land Use Plan includes this property in the Medium Density
Residential designation, however, this property has always been used as the site of the
Vail fnterfaith Chapel. IYs current zoning is Agricultural and Open Space. Staff believes
that it was an error to apply the Medium Density Residential land use designation to 4he
property. Staff is recommending that a designation of Public-Semi/Public is more
appropriate, given it's existing and historical uses.
References 410 #11 and #12. These tracts of land were established for the purpose of
protecting the floodplain and riparian zones associated with Middle Creek. It is clear that
the Land Use Plan categories, within which these properties are located, were not
intended to specifically designate these tracts as being available for'residential and/or
commercial development. Therefore, staff believes that their current Land Use Plan
designations of Resort Accommodations and Service, Transition Area, and Medium
Density Residential, uvere adopted in error. "
5
Reference #13. This tract of land is located immediately north of Gore Creek and
stretches east to west throughout much of the Lionshead area. It was established for the
purpose of protecting the riparian zone of Gore Creek. Staff believes that the current
Land Use Plan designation of Tourist Commercial, which is applied to the majority of the
Lionshead area, inadvertently included Tract B. ~We believe that the Land Use Plan is in
error with regard to the designation of this property and recommend that it be changed to
the Open Space designation.
3. How is the addition, deletion or change to the Plan in concert with the Plan in
gene a1? - The staff believes that all of the recommended changes to the Land Use Plan
designations, of the parcels identified in this memorandum, will not be detrimental to the
Plan in general since they do not appear to be reflective of their actual use and/or existing
zoning. Additionally, the proposed changes would appear to carry out the following goal
statements contained in the Vail Land Use Plan:
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance
between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor
and the permanent resident.
1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources
should be protected as the Town grows.
1.6 Development proposals on the hillsides should be evaluated on a case by case
basis. Limited development may be permitted for some low intensity uses-in
areas that are not highly visible from the valley floor. New projects should be .
carefully controlled and developed with sensitivity to the environment.
1.7 New subdivisions should not be permitted in high geologic hazard areas.
1.10 Development of town owned lands by the Town of Vail (other than parks and open
space), may be permitted where no high hazards exist, if development is for
public use.
1.13 Vail recognizes its stream tracts as being a desirable land feature as well as its
potential for public use.
2.5 The community should improve non-skier recreational options to improve year-
round tourism.
2.7 The Town of Vail should improve the existing park and open space lands while
continuing to purchase open space.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes to the Vail Land Use Plan designations of
the 17 properties identified in this memorandum. Staff believes that with regard to some of the
properties, conditions have changed since the Plan was originally adopted. With regard.to the
remaining properties, staff believes that their Land Use Plan designations were determined in
error originally. Staff also believes that all of the proposed Land Use Plan changes
recommended in this memorandum are in concert with the Land Use Plan in general.
6
~
0
~ ATTACHIVIEIVT 1
PROPOSED LAAID USE PLAN CHAIVGES
Rof Legal Description and Property omvnet Unique Featutes and CfiRERIA FOR CHANGING THE PLdN Lond Use
A Addros of propor4y and Asaessore Comments/Hazarade Demonatreto haa condKfons have chenged sinco the Plan
Parcel Pfumber Plen wras adopted, how the Ran Ig in error, or how the Destlnation
addkion, deletbn or change to the Plen is In eoncert FROAAiTO
rifth the Plan in general.
1 Unpatted land south of Town ot Vail Steep area - needed for Parcel located in high hazard roekiall zone and a red hazard MDR/OS
Courtside Townhomes 2101-124-00-00 south irail. #46 in OPL, snow avalanche. Land Use Plan did not consider the site
4.47 acres. Hezards: High constrainis associated with this property and theretore this
rock iall and red snow parcel received a residential land Use Plan designation in
avalanche. enor.
2 Unplatted land south of Lots Town of' Vaii Steep hillside. 2.48 acres, Parcel iocated in several high hazard areas. Land Use Plen LDR/OS
1-4, Block 2, Bighom tsi 2101-111-00-00 Hazards: High hazard did not consider the site constraints accosiated with this
Add'Aion debris flow end rockfall, property and therefore this parcel received e residentiel Land
red snow avalanche Use Plan designation in error.
3 Stream tract diiectly west ot Town oi Vail 1.73 acres. Hazards: None This stream tract is the 100-year floodplein. Lend Use Plan MDR/OS
Pitkin Creek 2101-111-00-00 did not consider the site constreints essociated with this
property and theretore this parcel recieved a residentiel Land
Use Plan designation in error.
4 Siream Tracts B 8 E, Vail Vail Assxiates Stream iracts. Hazards: This is a stream tract in the 100-year floodplain. Land Use LDR/OS
Village 11th Filing P.O. Box 7, Veil, Flood plain. Plen did not consider the sRe constrainis associated with this
CO 81656 properry and therefore this parcel recieved a residential Land
Use Plan designation in error.
5 Trect B, Vaii Village 12th Filing Vail Associates HazarcJs: High rocMall. Parcel located in a rockiall area and does not meet ihe LDR/OS
2101-034-05-00 minimum lot fmniage and site requirements for a
developabla lot. Land Use Plan did not consider the site
constrairAs asscociated with this property and tharafors this
parcel received a residential Land Use Plan designation in
ertor. •
6 South half of Tract F, Vail Town oi Vail Hazards: High debiis Paroel located in severel high hazard areas. Land Use Plan LDR/OS
Village 7th Filing. 2101-092-08-00 avalanche, medium did not eonsider the site constraints associated with this
rocMall and snow property and therefore this parcel received a residential Land
avalanche iniluence. Use Plan designation in error.
7 Tract A end Lots 9, 10, 11 Veil Town of Vail Hazard on-site. Hazards: Parcel located in several high hezerd areas. Land Use Plen LDR/OS
Village 10th Filing - Fairway 2101-081 •16-00 Medium rockfall, high did not consider the stte constraints associeted with this
Court debns avalanche, red property and theretore this parcel received a residentiel Land
snow avalanche. Use Plan designation in error.
8 Vail Intertaith Chapel, Vail Vail Religious Structura cwers pa2el The use of the site for religious services and functions is PADR/PSP
Road Foundalion 277 ecres. Hazards: more consistent with the Public/Semi-Public designation.
2101-071•09-00 None.
9 Lot 20A, Block 7, Vail Village Town of Val Wetlands on property. Site hes wetlends and restrietive covenants steting that the LDR/OS
1st Filing, 274 Beaver Dam 2101-071-t3-00 HazarOa: Wone. parcel shall stay in a open space use. Land Use Plan did not
Rd. ' consider the site rnnstraints associeted with this properiy
and therefore this percel received a residential Land Use
Plan designation in error.
10 Tracts A, Vail Lionshead 2nd Town o1 Vail Stream Tr= AAdde Creek This is a stream traq in the 100-year floodplain. Land Use RAS &
Filing 2101-064-07-02 runs througn n. Flezards: plan did not consider the site constraints associated with this TA/OS
and None. property and therefore this parcel received a RAS end TA
2101-064-07-00 Land Use Plan designation in error.
11 Tract A, Vail Village 2nd Filing Town ot Ve,l Hazerds: None. This is a stieam trert in the 100-year floodplain. Lend Use TA/OS
2101-064-07-01 Plan did not consider the site constreints associated with this
property and theretore this paroel received a TA Land Use
Plan designation in error.
12 Tracts C, Vail Lionshead 2nd Town ot Veil Stream Tract Middla Creek This is a stream tract in the 100-year floodplain. Land Use MDR/OS
Filing 2101-064-07-02 runs tnrougn n. Ha.zards: Plan did not consider the site const2ints associated with this
and None. properry and therefore this parcel received e MDR Land Use
2101-064-07•00 Plan designation in error.
13 Tract B, Vail Lionshead 1st Town of Vail Stream Tract. Hazards: This is a stream tract parcel. Land Use Plan did not TC/OS
Filing No parcel Fbod plam. cansider the site constraints associated with this propeAy
and therefore this parcel received a TC Land Use Plen
designation in error. LAND USE PLAW DESIGNATIONS
OS = Open Space TA = Transition Area
MDR = AAedium Density Residential RAS = Resorl Accomadation 8 Senrice
LDR = Low Density Residential TC = Tourist Commercial
P = Partc SB = Ski Base
PSP = Public Semi Public VMP = Vail Master Plan
~ .
I
8 ~
I i .
RIDGEVIEW S UARE
SUBDIVISION
BIGHORN SUBDIVISION
• ~"'TS a-G THIRD ADDITIOfV
~ 9-12 o INTERSTATE 70
4 J6 ~ ~ ~1 4593 u~RS 2.1 ( IN T.O.V. ) ~
4315G 45z5 ~,6,3 4^ 3 WOODRIDGE VAI - RACOUET CLUB
TOWNHUUSES
f- - - - - - DISTEL HOR +»o
-Sl18DIVISlO ' STq +ssi 4575
I I / 12 f4M 19 19 4484 13 14
S~nf G
4494 4512 15 pC(E- [AS q~ ' Q ~ ~
0
TIMDER FALLS 4532 16' 17 1 ~ 4610 aG~20 4C~ f
? 4552 4582 4590 , ~ ~4S Q e c`}l~HWSE
CONDOMINIUMS
~ Q a - a:~00 a496• 4503 ~STp asgp ~ RE CREEK
, S~:A • Q 4501 ~--i-, VAIL RACOUET CLUB 5020
o
4$Q4 4508 p ~
O Tos~J~ 4594 ~ AIL COf~pphfIN1UM$
O
4 0 tncouE ~ "
r s~ ~1'°
~ SUN WOpD 4560 . cLuewusc Q u BIGHORN <
~ T1MB~f: I MEADOW DR. 4693 46$fl PARK
O O,9 ~ GORE CREEK
~
%4575'. 4690 RIVERBEND MEADOWS 8 487' .
M ~ 4900 485 T ~
4460 q F? ° 0 ~ ~ ~4 m t ~,p~ ~ s 20 ~ 4 575
~ O O COURTSIDE fq0
4517 q•,r V~~-~ e T O w N M O M E S 0 W
4.510 `~J' 9 6'J9 .fz-~ 1 ~ ~-e • OR 486 4976 4916
4420 s,~ O q 8 3
TRACT D 2 q
• ~
23-r w 4
COURT$IDE 4~ 8 816 IF H A~DITIDI
.
TOWNNOMES ,9 184e19 17
47?9 BJ 16
~ TRACT C 2 oes
~ 4778 • 4791 ~
^ MOUN7AIN ~ F4
0
N MEADOY/S C
Ja B0 3 4 ae29
\ 4762 4799 Z f
C
~ TOWNOUSES rj 4940
T E SUBDIVISION 4792 4
4802 7 v
oeiz g
0 ~819 9
/48.~'aefa •
VAIL BOUNDARY . . . .~.a... .
-
1309 ot
SHOP BUSES
UNPLATTED f289 `
UNPLATTED • o vAIL VALLEY DRIVE 0
TOWN OF VAIL
MAINT. SHOP
~
INTERSI",4TE 70 7
(NOT IN T.O. v. )
.
TRACT P
o ~ V,41L VILLAGE. 84h. FILIRIG
TENNIS COURTS
x •
I VALLEY LI 4
O 3 1397
PA R K - d 1055 i II 1 1183 O 1297 1307
~a~ C 6 IS 1163 ~ 4 °
• A,1L 45T V4IL WAT[R 967 1031 104 0 05 8 O 9 10 v 9 0 1193
. SAUiTaTiON Bl(1 TTiACT 1 2 3 54 7 125 1159 : 2 ~ 2 22 ;
~ 1001 ° IOa' w ~ 11114 iioq 1287 1328
C. 1007 u 1034 1106 RNSILVER I C
FORD
AMPTNEATEA 1 ~ 3 u 4 9 10 1157 11e7 14 TRAGT
1022 ~ 5 ' 1~$7 ii36 12 . 13 0 1195 E
NATURE ~
CENTER p 6,1024 ioel ° Iif ~ O vALLEY
~oP~, 601 a 4 b12 .r 1014 1278
~ 1250
620
992 o VAII. 4 PARCEL E
d o O p 2 Zqp.~ GOLF COURSE MAINT.
SOCCER FIELD 3 TRACT D ° 1220
U
TRAGT A ggq p!~ ~
0 2 . Q p!*\ 1200
.170
996 3
1 2 3 4 S 6 2 F
'RTE A 998 1 017 I 7 1 7 1119 ~1 1150 7
;V,41L VILLAGE 7th. FILING ~
4 q 963 Q, g 5 PARCEL D
1 FI Z I 2 ~ '
923
wp~ L~
FAIRH'AY
• o °4
990
GE 104 FI IN
9 8 7 6 5
1 920 930 950 970
. . .
i . ,
UNPI.ATTED
MOUN7AIN BELI
SOIAR 150
VAIL ~1 A8C'SCHOOL,
~ LEARNING TREE
~fe)UNrAIN BELL RD.
a 129
•
' INTERSTATE 70
(IN T.O:V.) EsUWY-
l1JCK I, VAIL LIONSNEA d ING .
~ - -
VAN GE pARKIN.; j
POr 2 STRUCTURE ~ VAIL 7
i WEST- SOB INTERNATI N s
W,NOS , VAI NS EAD 395
348 ISt. I ING ~ 4 3~ ESO HELIPAO ' FAPT
LqN UOLETREE iZS I
~ ~A~~ , VAIL 11gT DIL GE 2nd Fl
LIFTHOUSE 21 5 LIONSHE P0 ~~E '
835 3 521 ~ 7 Ftl1CTF EAST LIpNSHEA[) U CLE ICE ARENA 2nd FILING
IONSHEAD Qf5 (com e,catl ~ -1~-u 321 O 2 PO ICE 8
RCAUE 6 0 OFFICES MAIN VAIL
331 LOOGE AT U ~C HEAO TRACT A C- 75 O EXIT
TREE70P5 ~T G Li AR ~.J.~
GONDOIA . VAIL
600 452 292 F E NAT'L BA 0 q LIONSHEAD o 7 IA I 281 BLDG.
CENj~R 5 ~ \ VAII VAILEY 2 10e $COR 10
. y ~ ~MEOICA CENTER p
121
HOLIpAY INN
• GOPf 9 I I SKAAL 13
~
HOUSE ALPHORN TANOAR GAiEwA ~
. TRACT D UM1PLATTED ~~T B 272 e ?~'ESr ~A~ 141 121 . C SZB' 12 l0T 0
~I 252 7 W Dq A o N
'IOLIDAY
UARE O r 232 AI VIL AG Zn L1N ~ VAIL VILLAGSDINN
6 5 4 3142 122 2 1 OUSE ~ 'oo
~
212 182 162 82 9 e j• M 4M
~ ARCADE
q 381 tA- uac~E 44 • qll. ~
92 362 FIRE • IS p
325 fOttEST ROaD • 4 5 VHIL IVG MEQDOW OEPT.
LIONSHEAD °i • ~~L qZ SONNENALP
ToT LoT V ILL G 3SZ ;o TRCGT B ~ G f~ ~~SM ,
~1 3' F LI G 41 40 VILLA 1S1
SKIER BRIDGE 363 1 275 39 38 37 36 GOR 21Z BANK
3 Z 343 333 ~5 223 193 153 123 7
1 383 ~ BnvA iA
0 4 3 a0 HS ~
0 447 421 pM 24 2T R RH SE
•lig 0 g o ~E.a ~ 8 9 10 19 23~ le4 134 28 • \I
;tTS n 463 c 7 374 354 344 324 8; 31 TRACT 2
63
O 6 394 2 25 26 29 ~ ~oP 1
434 20 21 245 22 185 165 30 32 pRK 43 ~
g 4 3i5 g~ 35 325 285 ~ . F 113 33 34 ,L~W c
454 42 • 226 7 186 166 RE 45 15 35 9; ILL¢~
•
327 I~e Z~ N 9 8 6 • 44' 8~~
~ 1~ • 12 146 5
Z • Cl. 307'
, 486 26 126 3
556 TRACT A I 6 5 4 3 Z 338 1~ ~7 Z
O 4~ 446 421 416 366 1 16 15 13 O 67 97 127 97 e7 1
278 211 • 07
299 r
-
_ / i ,
,
~ UNPIATTEO
T H E FA L L S UNPLATTEO '
AT VAIL BIGHORN SUBDI\
~ TNIRD ADDITION
. \ 3930 •
4p2p Q~~p
3850 0
PITKIN CREEK
, MEAD0WS
IN7ERSTATE 70
EMERGEHCY VEMICLE
THE LEOGCS TURNAqOUND
1, ~ Q1~Q pV~. Q UNI i 5 A- F
~•Q Q~ 3~ BIGFiO
'y-
E HIpI\
4
2C_ - PITKIN n 0.06 L9~l.C g7 °4123 , 6 7 9 (0
~ CREEK 5 `~oy ~ 4133 8 41q$ 421
-'0 p pAqK J7~1 3971 f ~ \ 13 4141 414$ (,9l/ 4143 I I 12 13 It
7 1[ N v 4173 4193 4 I
TR~CrQ~ ~ 40J p SPRUCE WAY
RACT GOR~CRE&C-1p/ 0 14 4110 4112 I ~ 6iGNOR LODGE qLTAIR V41L
7
4132 0 7 6 5 4 3
7 p 41 S 944 4192 422<
~ ~ 1 1 6 3954 3964 4 3 2 ~ ~
~ 877 3974
3994 4014 01 n 2
6 ~NF ~ ~ 5 3984
o
6' 0 3 4 z
'h1e 1 DR. o IUPINE oR aee 7 4 `t a 4054 4074 ~ 40940 19 ~
0 v 3BI 7 ~ on~ co~ ' =UI 1 Do ~ ~D' S W.S. "o r
n a:
3e~b 9626 m ~0°6 a 9907 2 7 dnc °
I B IA B 7 6 tg'' a~6r
1,0 ~ g 3947 A
\10 '~01 16 3967 3977 9997 401T 4027 ~ 14 yaIL COLUMDIN DR.
9 6 4096 I5
14146 18
,~s 030 4 116 16 4
0 IUPINE OR. 13 FinE 4126 ' - -
o+-4026 Ai10 ~ 4150
3916 q C~ 12
\O~ ~ _Ly 3956 3 4024• 11 3966 2 I 9 9f. ~1~jN0~ \I~
00 3989 33 ?R 4016 4022
Gp.- . 3~5 Q2 CONDOfViINIU
~ - 2IG-H-0BA
TERRACE
N D
~ ~ - BIGHORN
SIJBDIVISIO
BIGHORN SUB. RESUBDIVI:
FIRST ADDITIOfV OF L07' 20
O 3035 MpTC?{ 1tJE RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK-2
-3- oooT?i FALLS CoNOO•S. VAIL VILLAGE 121h. FILING
13 th. FILING 5 6 13 O b~o M. 309
0
2965 2975 3031 4 VAIL VILLAGE 12th. FILING
7
T.RAGT C 2945 2985 14 t(`
¢ 30e J O . .
3 IS 10 3 8 ~
~ 93 p0• 2360 ` 309 3100 17 3115 2
O . 2 9 16 3145 11 RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 7 BL,
2 ~ 92 940 3015 7
i
4
3120 . 3275 Vi41L VILLAGE 12th. FILING
65 3 O 920 17 3011 (D 6 ~ O
2793 Z o 3130
2e03 800TH CREEK 2 ~g 10
~ TOWNHOUSES ~ 5 4 326
~ • Ze2 ' 3140 3150 9 8 TRACT A
2873 2900 TRqCT B 3253 3245 O 3235 '4 Ch
qp • NS II 12 TRAC B 3241 5 k~ O
MpN s 3010 3236
VnIL MOUNTAIN 4
SGHOOC 7RACT C I 2 3
1 • 3160
7 3220 3226 3230
9 ?_"„7 ~ZL~-~t~_ Z
LOT 27 RESUBDIVISION OF TRACT _
AGE. VAIL VILLAGE II th. FILING INTERS7ATE 70 . INTERST E 70
TRACT E EMERGENCY vENICIE
TURNAROUNO (N0T IN T.O.V.) (IN T.O.V.)
1 2 I 2O 3 _.4 RACT A~
4Sp fN B55 2863 2905 2925 2945 248 10
II g 3130
12 80 ~ CqN f e CREEK 2990 4 5 6 7 0 3110 ~
17 0295 3 10 3030 3050 3070 309 5 G
oo~ 2 _
4 16 eso zeeo
13 IT eno I I .
810 2e9 0~292 2930 . ' • ~
14 IS ~ 3
82 293 2 ~ .
2910 TRAC VAIL VILLAGE I I th. FILING .
~ TRACT C
• -
UNPLATTED
RESUBDIV SIO
VAIL VILLAGE Ilth. FILING . .
IPIATTEO
TOWN OF VAIL ROUNn/\RY - ° =
~
RE(a1LATIUM 96.14-H-(2) ~
10
Any adjustments in the sale price such as allouable discounts, rebates and credits cannot be
;7D anticipated and the tax must be based on the original price unless such adjustments have
•'l actually been made prior to the filing of the return uherein such sale is reported. Houever,
if the price upon which the tax uas computed and paid to the City by the vendor is subsequently
readjusted, Prior to payment of the tax by the purchaser, a proper credit may be taken against'
the tax clue on the next subsequent return.
. oa
J No credit for discount uill be altoued to a vendor unless the decrease in Sales Tax is actually
passed on to the consianer. A cash discount actually given for a payment on or before a given
date is an allouable adjustment to the selling price in determinin9 gross taxable sales.
-oa If. any vendor makes an overpayment of the tax, or is entitled to a credit on his/her tax
~d payments on account of mistake, errors or cancelled sales, credit for the amount of overpayment
~ due from the City may be taken on the subsequent return and filed Within a reasonable time
•.m thereafter, unless such person is no longer engaged in business, in uhich event he/she should
' apply for a refund.
~sn
~ uhere any taxable article is returned to the vendor thereof for adjustment, replacement, or
~ exchange, under a guarantee as to quality or service, and a neu article is given pursuant to
the guarantee, free or at a reduced price, the tax shall be cortiputed on the actual amount
paid to the vendor for the nea article.
~
uhen any article sold is returned and the sale rescinded in the same tax period, no Sales Tax
is due on the transaction if a full refund is issued.
J I-(1) Prescriptien Drucls artd Prosthetic Devices
~ -
The sale or purchase of drugs for hwnan consumption only, dispensed in accordance uith a prescription being a
~ uritten order by a legally qualified member of the healing arts ordering any registered pharmacist to dispense
drugs to a specified individual, all sales of insulin in all its forms dispensed pursuant to the direction of
a licensed physician, all sales of glucose usable for treatment of insulin reactions, all sales of urine and
y~ blood testing kits and materials, all sales of insulin measuring and injecting devices, including insulin
syringes and hypodermic needles, and all sales of prosthetic devices.
~ REGI1LAT! 0N 96.14- I- (1) •
(1) The sale and purchase of prescription drugs for himian consumption are exempted from the
imposition of the Sales Tax. This is to be interpreted to mean the end sale; that is, between
the pharmacist (vendor) and the patient uhen prescribed by prescription of a physician or when
purchased by a legally qualified member of the healing arts for use as part of patients
~I treatment is exempt. Physicians, surgeons, hospitals, clinics, dentists, and veterinarians
are the consurners of the various items of tangible personal property uhich they use in the
r rendition of their professional services, and as such, are required to pay the tax to'the
I~ vendor on all purchases of tools, equipment and other medical supplies other than prescription
' drugs.
i~ (a) The term "prescription drugs" shall be defined as medicinal substances, such as narcotics,
-J barbiturates, antibiotics, penicillin and sulfa drugs, etc., used in the treatment or
prevention of disease, which are purchased under a prescription order of a state license
practitioner of the healing arts and dispensed by a state licensed pharmacist.
(b) All sates and purchases of proprietary drugs or patent medicines or non-prescription drugs are taxable. All sales and purchases of drugs or medicines for use or consumption by animals
are taxable.
i ~
~
(2) The Sale and purchase of prosthetic devices are exempted from the imposition of the Sales
Tax.
(a) The term "prosthetic device" shall be defined as any artificial limb, part device or
appliance ahich (1) aids or replaces a bodily function, (2) is designed, manufactured, altered
or adjusted to fit a particutar individual, and (3) is prescribed by a licensed practitioner
of the healing arts.
I~ 31
-O-
r~
0
a _u
(b) Prosthetic devices include prescribed auditory,. ophthalmic or ocular, cardiac, dental, e~
therapeutic, or orthopedic devices or appliances which meet the definition of prosthetic -
device, as stated herein.
1JI
(c) Standardized or stock devices or appliances, whether or not mass produced, which are
designed for use by the mass populace or may be used for purposes other than the treatment of
t medical disorders arc not prosthetic devices. -
(3) Physicians, surgeons, dentists, veterinarians and other licensed practitioners of the
healing arts, and hospitals, clinics and the like, shall pay the tax on the sale price of their
purchases of any equiFxnent, instruments, furniture, fixtures and medical and surgical supplies
used or consumed in the ordinary and usual course of the business or practices. M;.
-
(4) The list of exempted drugs and prosthetic devices cannot be increased by implication or ;7
similarity. If there is any doubt as to the taxabitity on the sale or purchase of any
particular item, the taxpayer should exercise the option provided for under Regulation 16.98
herein and inure as to the exempt status of such item, in all cases, the burden of proof is upon the taxpayer to establish that a sale or purchase is tax exempt.
(5) As veterinary drugs sold at retail are not exempt from sates tax, the manner in which the
tax obligation must be extinguished is dependent upon uhether consumption occurs in the
performance of a veterinarian's professional services or apart from such services. -(6) Veterinarians are primarily engaged in the business of rendering professional services, IL...
the gross receipts from which are not subject to sales tax, to ouners of domestic animals ~
through care, medication, and treatment of such animals. All items of tangible personal ~
property such as drugs, medicines, serums, bandages, and dressings which are used in the -
rendition of such professional services are deemed consumied by the veterinarian and thus are
taxable to him. In order for items such as bandages and dressings to be considered consumed
in the rendition of professional services they must be applied by the veterinarians or persons
in his/her ertploy. Drugs, medicines, and serians uitl be considered consumed in the rendition . Ew-
of professional services only when either (a) administered directly by the veterinarian or -
persons in his/her employ or, (b) dispensed by him upon actual diagnosis of illness or disease
or in prevention thereof. {p:.
(7) Hhere veterinarians sell tangible personal property to consiuners, which sales are separate
and apart from the rendition of professional services as heretofore set out, they are required P!
to register, collect•and remit sales tax.
J-(1) Food Stantp or Fedarat Spacial SLipplement Program Sales
The sales and purchases of food, as specified in 7 U.S.C. Section 2012(g), as such section exists on October W1, 1987, or is thereafter amended, which is purchased with food stamps pursuant to the' Federal Food Stamp
Program and; pp;
The sales and purchases of food, as specified in 42 U.S.C. Section 1786, as such section exists on October 1,
1987, or is thereafter amended, which is purchased with u1C vouchers or checks pursuant to the Federal Special
Supplemental Program tor Woman, Infants, and Children are exempt fran the Steamboat Springs Sales Tax.
RE(XILATIQY 16.94-J-(9) `
All sales and purchases of food in the City are taxable except for qualified purchases under
the Federal Food Stamp and Federal Special Supplement Programs.
The following is a partial list of food and non-food items which qualify,under the Federal Food
Stamp Program and is intended as a guide, refer to the specific United States Code section for ~
more detail. The Federal Food Stamp Program definition includes, meat, poultry, fish, bread,
and breadstuffs, cereals, vegetables, fruits, fruit and vegetable juices, dairy products,
coffee, tea, cocoa, candy, breath mints, condiments, spices, soft drinks, cakes, cookies, ~
potato chips, special dietary foods (e.g., diabetic and dietetic), enriched or fortified foods,
health food items (e.g., Merecal, Enfamil, Sustegen, aheat germ, brewer's yeast, sunflowcr ~
seeds which are packaged for human consumption, rose hips pouder which is used for preparing
tea, and other food products which are substituted for more camnonly used food items in the
diet), infant formulas•, distilled water for human consumption, ice for human consumption, and ~
items incorporated into foods aith other ingredients (e.g., pectin, lard and vegetable oils).
32 `
C~.
~
~ TOWN OF VAIL SALES TAX POLICY 88-12
I
TO CLARIFY CHAPTER 3.40 OF THE TOj4N OF
VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE
Medical Exemptions
First, the tax levied by the Town of Vail shall not
apply to any supplies given, sold or consumed while an outpatient,
inpatient,_or emergency room patient at the hospital.
Second, if not being treated at the hospital, the tax
levied by the Town of Vail shall not apply to the purchase price
of prescription drugs or prosthetic devices.
Prescription drugs and prosthetic device defined:
~ Prescription Druq - means a substance for human
~ consumption used in the treatment or prevention of disease or
other illness, the sale of which is delivered on a written order,
dated and signed by a licensed practitioner of the healing arts
specifying the name and address of the patient for whom the
medical substance is or.dered and directions, if any, to be placed
on the label or dispensed in the practitioner's office.
Prescription drug does not include any medical substance which may
be purchased by the general public without a physician's
prescriptiono
~ SALES TAX POLICY 88-12
~ PAGE 2
~
Prosthetic Device - means any artificial limb, part
device or appliance for human, use, which aids or replaces a bodily
function; is designed, manufactured, alte.red or adjusted to fit a
particular patient; and is prescribed by a licensed practitioner
of the healing arts. Prosthetic devices include but are not
limited to prescribed auditory, ophthalmic or ocular, cardiac,
dental, therapeutic, or orthopedic devices or appliances, and
oxygen with related accessories.
Licensed Practitioner of Healinq Arts - anyone who
passed the State requirements which include: testing, degree,
residency or internship; who can legally prescribe drugs as
defined herein.
The terms prescription drug and_prosthetic device include but are
not limited to the following:
blood and blood products and derivatives
contact lenses (corrective)
crutches sold to patients under written prescriptions
dentures and items designed to restore or replace a
dental function, e.g. inlays, crowns, fillings and
orthodontic wires and traction devices
eyeglasses and frames (corrective)
hearing aids and batteries
hemodialysis products for use at the patients home
hospital beds sold to patients with prescriptions
insulin and insulin injecting and measuring devices
oxygen and related equipment when prescribed
pacemakers
shoes, special when prescribed
wheelchairs when sold to patients with a prescription
drugs, ointments and medicines administered by doctors
x-rays and film ~
0
a
~ SALES TAX POLICY 88-12
, PAGE 2
~
The terms prescription drug and prosthetic device do not include
medical equipment or supplies such as:
contact lenses (cosmetic)
c,ontact lens chemicals and appliances
crutches without a prescription or when sold to a
licensed practitioner's office
dietary supplements and special foodstuffs
eyeglasses (cosmetic) such as non-prescription
sunglasses
hot tubs, whirlpools, mattresses, chairs and other
similar "appliances"
kits - urine, pregnancy, blood, etc.
pregnancy prevention devices purchased over the counter
ramps, special equipment and other facilitating devices
used to aid mobilization of handicapped
supplies consumed by licensed practitioners, e.g.
tongue depressors, cotton swabs, etc.
vitamins and vitamin supplements
wheeTchairs without a prescription or when sold to a
~ licensed practitioner's of-fice
June l, 1988
RONDALL V. PHILLIPS EFFECTIVE DATE OF POLICY
~
.
, W5 5,a3-15 \&u- f 6
EA uLE COUNTY MASS
,
TRANSPORTATION ,
:L. . x . . : _r F . : . .
Questions to be Answered,.
-
io what 9"z the Town Council"s Conce` ~i~
~
Vis8on of Mass Transportation i"n Eagle
County?
2. ~nfflyvrAuthargly wil1 e
respahsoble to Develop and Operate Mass
Transportatoon on Ea 4e County'?
3. What are the near far term, fundinO O p p ~ ~
o~~~~catoons re ~rde~~ ~~~ta1 uo ent,
Facilities and Operation .
4o How should Mass Tr~~~ ortation be
funded in ~nd L ong terrn ?
5. Is a o'Transportatson Tax" ballot
~ rioate to e i"nc/uded in
v'
EAGLE
COUNTY MASS
TRANSPORTATION 1. What os the Town Councol°s Concept and Vision of Mass
Transportato~n i'n Eagde County?
TAFF RECOMMENDATIONo
0 THESYSTEM BEMULT9-MODALo WOULD
§NCL C~ ~E ALL KU NDS/ 6 EI Fi ES OF TRANSPORfl ATIONo
Y V' Fl ODES0 . .
0 THE SY SO E(!W9 V d OU@aD COU FYSIST OH
veEXPRESS TYPE"" ROUTES THAT OPERATE PRIMARILY
Ol'! V 1-70 6 YY VD VS 6.
0 THE S Y ~ ~EM TO BE UL TIMA TEL Y L INKED
TO AL/ V ~~~G COUW V TIES WItl tl 41 E4 l~ ~STI G OR
DL_ W ELOFI ING U U Y O 11 U VS¦ ORU ATIO SYSTEM p '
0 THA T S YS TEM FUNDING A ND
OPERATIONS BE ""DE-POLIT/CIZEDF a
0 §NITIAL FOCUS BE ON DEYELOP,dYG
EXISd ING BUS SERVICE WITHIN THE COUNTlO
0 SYSTEM A LLOWS CONTe UED
OPERATION OF EXI STING CO 9VI UI d i TY BUS SERVI CES
SEPERATE AND DISTINCT FROM THE C VNTY IDE
MASS TRANSPOR6.ATI ON SYSTEMo.
.
EA OLE COUNTY MASS
TRANSPORTATION
2. tf L/ Itl UL1 YT L.1'! VTITY OR O UUTHORITY 9V NLL BE !J lJESPOO VS/~~~
~ ~~ON IN
EAGLE COUNT?
G
0 ESU ABm ISL C/ f! Y! SEPERA~~ AUTHORIT^U m
DE V EL O6 f! -O U FY D OPEp LI A IJ "1~! !1 !9 B E S YS TE O
0 EACH INCORPORAY ED COY U tl UNI I Y
SERV ~ Y THE AV:/ 0 ~Il b OR't! IY r! LUS TQ W E COUd V TY
V [7 OULD APi! OINT ONE MBa MBER TO S@m VE O tl ¦ ¦ E
' AUTHOR'TY BOARD OF DIRECTORS0 EACHMEMBER
V V OULD HAVE O9 VE V OTE0 .
0 BOARD V U OULD HAVE T E !Y ?UTHOR'TY T •
APb-" ~INT STAFFy DEVELOP AND IMPLEIY9EI Y T d HE
SYSTEM FOR THE REGI o
0 EACH SERVED COMMU/YlTl AGREES -TO
APPROP IATE A FAIR PORTIO/~ ~ ~
FI NCE TH~ IN~~~AL ~ESEARC Anl DEVEL PME110T
lI HASE OF THE SY STE O .
0 THE BOA D OULD BE RESPONSIBLE AIVD
REPORT D1RECTLY TO THE COUIVTY
COMMISSOONERS.
~ .
EA 02ijt hiw COUNTY MASS
TR A S NPORTATION
3. WHAT ARE THE NEAR AND FAR TERM FUNDIIYG
UMPLICATIONS REGARDING CA~~TAL EQ0~ ~~MEd Y T
FACILIT1ES AND OPERATIONS?
0 HOW DO WE CONTINUE TO FUND EX0STING
SYSTEM UNTgL A TRUE REGIONAL SYSTEM BECOMES
OPERATBONAL 1-3 YEAR$)
TOV WITHD6~~ ~ ~~~~ING FR0M LEADVI LLE
AND REAPPORTsON TO G YPSUM - VA1L ROUTEo
AV O0t7/BVRA d VUC%D LEADVtlLLE ROUI E PLC49S HIWAY 6.
. . . , .._..,r LONG TER
{7Gi' HAT FUNDI8 17G SOURCES E/SIV T TO
CAPITILIZE AND OPERATE A COUIVT1/ WIDE S1,STEM?
- A TRANSPORTATIOIV TAaC
- FEDERAL CAPITAL AND OPERATIIVG
GRA(1 @! TSO
NE S I ~~FT TAaC AT BCI A R WF/EAD9
ADAMS RI y ETC.
PLANNs~~ AND ENvsRorvMEN-rAL coMnnissioN
May 22, 1995 , -
AGENDA
Please meet at the Com-Ded office a41:30a No lunch will be servedo
Site Visi4s 9:30 p.rne
1. One Vail Place
Drivers: Jim and Mike
Public F9earing 2:00 p.rn.
1. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an automatic teller machine to be
located at 244 Wall StreeUa part of Block 5C, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: FirstBank of Vail/Blanche C. Hill
Planner: Jim Curnutte ,
2. A request for a major SDD amendment to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office
Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesUArea #4, SDD #4, Cascade Village.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Partners
Pfanner: Randy Stouder TABL.ED INDEFINITELV
3. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining deck at the Daily
Grind Coffee Company located at 288 Bridge Street/Lot B, Block 5H, Vail Village St.
Filing.
Applicant: The Daily Grind Coffee Company
Planner: George Ruther TABLED tNDEFINlTELV
4. A request for a minor SDD amendment to allow for a modification to the Alpenrose
outdoor dining deck located at 100 East Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village First
Filing.
Applicant: Mirco and Verena Tonon and Peter Haller
Planner: Randy Stouder lA/ITHDRe4VllN
5. Council update: .
Byrne Conditional Use
Vail Commons
6. Discussion with Susan Connelly.
1leveryonelpeclagendas\052295
1
tl
I
{ D]ESgGN REVIEW BOAItBD AGENDA
~s Wednesday, Niay 17, g995
,
3:00 P.M.
PROJIECT ORIIEN7CA1['ION 1Il:00 AM
SI'II'IE V][SITS fl o 00 PM
1. Crossroads - 143 E.1Vleadow Drive
2. Hovey - 1339 Westhaven Circle
3. Cunningham - 1319 Greenhill Court
4. Hitt/1Vlehler - 1717 Geneva Drive 5. Rosen - 1722 Geneva Drive
6. Hackman - 2801 Snowberry Drive
7. Schmidt - 1410 Buffehr Creek Road
8. Dauphinais - 1824 Glacier Court
9. Villa Cortina - 22 West Meadow Drive
10. Byrne - 126 Forest Road
11. Gartons - 143 E. Meadow Drive
12. Johnson - 375 Mill Creek Circle _
Drivers: George & lLaurere
1. Tovvn of Vail - Pulis Bridge LViI
South Frontage Road and Vail Valley Dr.
Applicant: Town of.Vail
MOTIOIV: Brainerd SECOIVD: Moffet VOTE:4-0
Approved with Condi4ions
2. Trevina L.P. - Repaint Crossroads Center (Both buildings) RS
143 E. Meadow Drive/Lot P. Block SD, Vail Village lst Filing
Applicant: Steve Stafford for Crossroads Condo & Commercial Assoc
MOTIOIV:. Brainerd SECOND: Woldrich VOTE: 4-0
Approved
3. Gartons Corral and Sign applications RS
143 E. Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block SD, Vail Village lst Filing
Applicant: Dave Garton/Garton's Bar & Grill
MOTION: Brainerd SECOND: Moffet VOTE: 3-1 (VNoldrich dissenting)
Corral- Approved Signs- Approved with Conditions
l
. 4. Haagen Dazs - Sign Application LW
141 East Meadow Drive/Crossroads
Applicant: Rick Almas
MOTION: Brainerd SECOND: Woldrich VOTE:4-0
Consent Approved.
5. Cunningham - new Primary/Secondary Residence RS
1319 Greenhill Court/Lot 24, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Applicant: Barry Cunningham
MOTION: Brainerd SECOND: Woldrich VOTE:4-0
Tabled to 6/17/95
6. Villa Cortina Trash Enclosure GR
22 West Meadow Drive/Lot H, Vail Village 2nd
Applicant: Rick Haltman MOTION: Brainerd SECOND: Woldrich VOTE:4-0
Approved with Conditions
7. Hilb - Change to approved Plans GR
4040 North Frontage Road/Lot 3, Pitkin Creek Townhomes
Applicant: Dave Hilb
MOTION: Brainerd SECOND: Woldrich VOTE:4-0
Consent Approved- One Condition
8. Johnson Residence - change to previously approved plans GR ,
375 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 17, Block 1, Vail Village 1 st Filing
Applicant: Pierce, Segerberg representing the owners
MOTION: Brainerd SECOND: Woldrich VOTE:4-0
Consent Approved- One Condition
9. Schmidt - Conceptual review of new secondary unit and addition to LW
primary unit using an additional 250 sq.ft. GRFA allotment
1410 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot G1, Lionsridge Filing #2
Applicant: Leroy Schmidt .
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
No Vote- Conceptual
10. Byrne - conceptual review of a new primary/secondary with an EHU LW
126 Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing .
Applicant: Ron Byrne
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
No Vote- Conceptual
2
o '
11. Hackman - Conceptual review of a new single family residence LVV
2801 Snowrberry Drive/Lot 9, Block 9, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Patricia and David Hackman
MOTIOIV: SECO(VD: VOTE:
RNo !l04e- Conceptual
12. Rosen - Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence GR
1722 Geneva Drive/Lot 10, Matterhorn Village
. Applicarit: Rick Rosen
MOTION: SECOIVD: VOTE:
No Vote- Concep4ual ,
93. Dauphinais-Moseley - Conceptual design of a new primary/secondary residence GR
1824 Glacier CourULot 20, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3 '
Applicant: Pat Dauphinais
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
No Vo4e- Conceptual
14. Hovey - Conceptual review of a new single family residence LV1l
1339 V1lesthaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Applicant: Charles and Nancy Hovey
MOTION: ' SECOND: VOTE:
No Vote- Conceptual
15. Hitt/Mehler - New Duplex residence LUV
1717 Geneva Drive/Lot 8A, Matterhorn Village Subdivision
App4icant: Dennis & Debbie Mehler and Gridget & Farrow Hitt
MOTIOfV: . SEGOND: VOTE:
No Vote- Conceptual
16. Ganter - Addition and deck, stairs, and hot tub JC
2427 W. Chamonix, #1/Lot 22, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing #1
Applicant: Judy Ganter
MOTIOIV: SECOIVD: VOTE:
TABLED BNDEFINITELV
Staff Aorovals
Coldstream Condominiums - Paint & move existing sign and redo entryway RS
1476 VVesthaven D rive/Cold stream Condominiums
Applicant: Colstream Condominium Association
FAEVERY0NE\DRB\AGENDAS\051595 3
. s
.
- Langenwalter/Cleveland - Addition GR
2586 Arosa Drive/Lot 1, Block D, Vail Ridge Subdivision
Applicant: Kathy Langenwalter and Dick Cleveland
Stearns/O'Laughlin - Minor window/door changes. Mm
4708 Meadnw Dr.Bighorn Townhomes, Unit A-4
Applicant: Sid Schultz
Helipad - Improve existing helipad site. • AK
75 S Frontage Rd/Unplatted parcel, Municipal Annex
Applicant: Todd Oppenheimer Rembert - 250GRFA addition. AK
1547 Springhill Ln/Lot 2, Block 3, Vail Valley 2nd Filing
Applicant: Frank Rembert
Swartz Residence. - addition of two windows JC
1106 HornsilverlLot 9, Block 6, Vail Vaillage 7th
Applicant: Allen & Kathy Swartz
Golden Peak House - Rooftop mechanical screening/railing detail Mm
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B& C, Block 2, Vail Village First
Applicant: Lee Neeley, Snowden & Hoplans
John's Deck Enclosure - Enslosure of existing decks totalling 248 s.f. GR
3094 Booth Falls Road
Applicant: Gordon Rowe
Connelly Re-roof - Replace wood shake shingles with asphalt shingles JC
4238 Nugget Lane
Applicant: Michael Connelly
Indian Creek Building # 1- Numerous minor changes to previously aproved 3C
plans (fenestration, materials, mass, etc.)
1139 Sandstone Dr. `
Applicant: Mike Lauterbach
Caster Residence - Add stone veneer over existing lower level stucco RS
trim & deck rails to match other half of duplex; remove window & replace with
slider, add trellis, add landscaping
2375 Bald Mountain Road
Applicant: Ben Aguilar
FAEVERY0NE1DRBWGENDASW51795 4
..:u'.. _ - '
. _ _
:
. _ '
. .
~
.
_ . 4 •.a.... . ~ . _ _ - .
. e
_ . ~ . . . ~
.
- . . . - . . - ~ _ . • ?
~ .
~ . . , . . ~ . ' _ - - . ~
. . . . . . . . .r.
~
' _ - _ ~ . . . . _
' ' ~ .4 . . . ' ~ . ' " i: : ~ _ - . . ~ ~ ~ _ _ _L~;• - ,
_ ~ . . . -
" ' -
~ / ~ ~ ~ / iRJ?OSEDFEMC
/ . ~ y:~ .~t~ ~ - •f'' . .
.
a- - -=E~
.
~
.
_ . . : • ' .
. .
"i
~
' . . . . " ~ . .
~ '^J .
- - -
: " .
.
'
• .
.a
. . ~ . -
. . , _ . -
~
,
. . . _ . - . . .
. .
. . . 1 - -
. . . - - . ~ ~ : . _ . .
Y-
. . ' ' . . . . _ " - . .
_ . . . . . . .
. ' . . . ~ . ~ . . . .
~ ~ • ' ~
- ~ . . • ? _ ' /
, ~ xu•,£~a~~ ..t. ~ .
• _ ' - .'F~~' v~m~ ~ ~i ~ ~ .
i y.~ , . ~ _ n1 ` ..ti e• ,%.L~ •
01 " 1• ~ `'L.'.r.._e Xr~ce_ti-~. / ~C~.~ . ' , . . .
' ~ ' Ya ~ Cv.^: +9 ~l~ ,i //~rj~ . . .
_ ( _ . ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~~•,r - .
• _ ~ ~ ? = ~~l " ~ ~ f - w , 1
~ ~ L .[1~ ` . ~ : ~ .3"7'b w ~ ~6i. ~l..~.~.C'. 3'•~. ~ L ~ . . . .
. l 1 ~ \ _ ` L~~ ` ~~+~.:/[a: r '/til'~ ' . .
•J - ~ / r ~ " r. 'ti - s e ~ I, - ~
asc-e~ / ` ~ . \ ' . ~ '-'1 .:r
. '
-
~ ~
f
I ~
ete-m.
r~.~C~ . ,
~ l.•'~~+_. ' j- ~ti`. ~ ~ /~~-%r' , " ' '
. ~ ' T-7p..s•~ .-a 4'i- \ ;e. .y r~ "4'
~ r.~~1
.~.m.evc,T . ~ .•;c~ . ~ . ~ , t- • a:.i. ~ l ti ' / . ~ ~ ~ a.. wce ~ e vn»es , ,
- _C• ~ ~ ~ ~`c e~. =i: ' / ~ ~ a
. . . - tfn:. ~ `..~r~., ae.~ - ~ f~~/•..i.y`~., ~r
_ . _t
- . _ . , .
~ . . . ~ ~ ~ , .
. . . . ; . . • . ' . ~ _ ' ' . .
. . . ~ " - , ~ . . . . . ~ . . _ ' ~ \ _ . . . . . . .
l .t • r-YV~
. ~ ~ • ~ °`f ~ . ~ r , , • `
, r_ ~ ! 1 y e. ° s " ~ ~ . / . ' _ . .
, ~siu! . i ~ ~-~..-.'t . • , ' ~ . . . .
•~i• - " . . " . . ' - .`6:e ' ~ ^ JL[+ / ~ . '
. ' ~ . f' . 1~ - . h7~ ~ ~ . ' J ~ ' ~ ~ _ . .
y 1~,~• ~y~~`~ ( ri' . c~~ ~ r~).-' . , . L~.1:!7~-~ ..w . . ' . '
l . - --f.. ~ ' ' ` . ~j• i ' . I . ' .
. .
. " _ , v ~ ~ ~ 'O . ' " 0 . . ,
.
. ~ ~ . , . _ , _ .
. ' . ~'YP~J.~ i 1 . . . . r . ' _ . ' . . .
CeMan'6rI.N:
1 ' Y
. . .
,
.
. • ~
. .
b _ . . ° ' .
, .
; ;i. , ' , , . '
7 r, , ' ~t
, ~ .
5 ~t M'~ 7 ' . ' ~ . . - ' . ~ ~,S . j:F s.
. . . . 'S.. . . . . . ,
. . . ' S . ~ . , . . . ' . . . . . . . . . ,
. . .
~i • t.. . . . . . . . .
. :
: ~
. . .~,..~i . . . , .
.
,..1.
.
.~..c..,, .
. . ~ .
.ri..lrv .
l:
~~1.1.. Le, . .
- l.a~. ~ .o..~..~ . . . ~ • ~ t•~.-,':
. . ''ti : a~ . • , . , . . . ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~t *
~ ~.~.y:•~`;~},,J.~;~,))~~.•.~, ~ ~.r,:,\~ . ~ ' , , ~ , ' . . . . . . ::~:.~~7.,,
' ! ~ ~ t ' . ~ ' . . . . . • , ~ ~
~ ' J • . ' . . ' ' . . j' ~ .
• . ' ~ ~ ~ . .
. . . . . ~
. ~ A~ ~ p ~ + r~ ~
I~.
~ tl 4,,~~ t ' ' • ~ fi + ; , ~ ' ~
' ~ , ;
,
.
. y
1 1 , ~ y' ¢ A+ ~ ~ ~ ~ rr^ w aI
A
it- t'. ' ~t i ~M• ~,'Y ~r r~•
r•. ~y t
~ ' s • ~ ~ 4 ~r~~+{ 1 ~.~.R/ * a .
~V ~4.',•~~ r r x~• 4
.
y+~? ' t `r ""fAcC~ ,e i
~'~i. ¢~*x•~r My;~ J ,
~ i'~ ~~y~W .•l~ . l
~ry . m ~J?d `r~q - .
. ~ ~r ~F ~ • M .1
~ . r .1. _~:L:~~+i"',7~a1~'.:~~~.: •
Y ~ ~ r a . . ' . • . , . /,,1' ~ . i
, . • . ' ~ . ~ . . . . ' ~ ' ' f . .
. ~ : . . . . .
.
~ ' . ~ ' , • , , . _ . ,
,
. .
~ <
_ ~
a
,i. . ~ ' i ~ . . . ~ . ; . ~ . • '
. . ' . . . . . '1'~' " . . ~ . . ~ . , .
SD'r BY'EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-16-95 ; 16•16 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 4
~
W}y 16, 1995 - 16:27
'4.'.
IA(;IF((1lINlYlilllllANi;
' 'ifRl UR( )Af )WAl'
( 3FFIf'l: l1f 'I'I IC "r ' P.( K( l;( Ji.'d1
8( inRf ) i~r" c:OMMr:;su ONl•R5 . L'Ai ;l f, l:( )I ONAf ) ti 163 t
rnx: 00:1).2 t~-7207
_ o;~• ~~.;t,; ~~i '
EAGLE COU1 ~~~OAADO
AGENDA .
CxjMD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REG'U'LAR MEEn n~~
Y 229 1995
9o15 -10:45 WVORc SEssION - vu~Y UPOA"M
Ja& D. LeM5, Counfy n?ranaW
10o46 - I to .
Rc sEssiON m PBUNG U71GAMOu
JaMes R FntZe, County Attomey
~ 1e30 -2:00 ~JALUNCH
IL~~ ON .
EALLE caunrrv n=cE cDqnSt
2oW ° WYORK SESSION - ATTENDED
31.W ° 3.15 BREAK
315- 3030 CONSEIVT CALENDAR
itmm of $ mare and na,-=~ Fma,O am FIX811 a? ft oa,aNI ra*rdff magmu,B ewa of cauny cxn.,,rssb-m,s to sped ft rum
and mrgyr an nmre inpnrtant ftm on e kqhy sgmda Arry c"rtrrmaw rrtay roque9t tlat an itern be'mAq4w ftm the aonaerd mje~
artd =Wd8fed Wparetely. Arry rteardwagftPUbkptaY W:QLIEST" eny ken he FagIIpAIgriPiCfl'1411@ Corm:rd Agerd&
~ e L9!¦ L P/"9 Y111lG
L.I[lda PanI41Ch, ACcoU[ltlllg
Ni'dlk SIKeMOi1'i, (ontrolleP
AL'MON: Appmva@ subject to review by the Courity M-anager.
SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-16-95 ; 16:17 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 2/ 4
2. PAYRUL F IVIAIf 25, 1995
Jack D. Lewis, County Manager
ACTION: Appruval subject to review by the County Manager.
I 9 IOffi4L ACqa:EIVEl1(I° 8E111FEIV EAGLE
COUNTY, F`91 ~OF Cs1/s..m+R/'lDO lrYV./ 1HE 1 W YI\ !JF
~D C1.JlFF F'bRS /y1tl1MWL CONTROL SGWVES
Bob Slag(e, Mirtal Contro!
ACTION: Consider approdal.
~ FICA?710N OF P LE71OIIV FOR POLAt
STAR ENDOE -
George Roussos, Engineeing
a Consider approval.
I lJNTf RAW.S 5ER1/1CE OFFICERS NIOIYTI-BLY
REFORT FOR APFdL,1995
Jack Johnson,l/eterans Servioe Off'ioer .
TI o Consider approvaL .
S. f4fEl~ BErMEJEN EAGLE COUNTY, ST'ATE O~
COLORADO AND HARf7Y'S HEA1/Y HAUUM OF BASALT
o FOR GFiAVEL HAULlNG
Dort Fes.sier, Road artd Bddge
A 0 Consider approval.
7. EAGLE COUNTY REGtONAL AIRPORT PASTJRE I..~E
EXECLlT1ON VUI7H CFIR1S ESTES .
Dan Reynolds, Airport
ACTI o Consider approval.
S. A NG THE IVCEIVIENT OF `I'FIE
WARRi4NTY PEIZIQD, McGARbY ACR~~
~UBD11iISIOMNQTI1NCHANI RAAtCF#
John-Athoff, Engineering .
ACTION: Consider approval.
B. END P AL FOR CENTRAL SLJP~~Y
Nlark Silverthron, Fnance Departrnert
Aliaa 6-iblder, Finanoe [jeparhmnt
Consider approval.
SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-16-95 ; 16:17 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 3/ 4
3:30 - 3' A A9N1ENf~~D A1iD 61GSTMTED DEO.rl-AIVA1 IOItl \JF
RESTRICTI1lE CO1/ENANTS, CONDI710NS, e4ND
~ RESTRIC7°IONS FOR BERRY CREEK RANCH
SllM11/IStOIV, FsUNGS, 1, 4 3, AND4(fabled fcrm 5115195)
Jack Leauis, Courety Lianager
ON: Consider approval.
BL R&SOLUTIOIV AL1'THORRONG DRAIMNG OF COl1ATERAL
OF LETTER OF CREDIT 9144787 FOR KED
D IVVENT ROAD ctJT PERI1117' NUNBER i903
Jim Ffitze, (:ounty Attomey
o Consider approval.
. C. RESOLUTIOhl AllFl-IORZING D2AVVlIVG OF COL1.A1EF8AL
• OF LErIER OF CREDIT 9144639 FOR KED
DEVELOPMENT ROAD C1lTS PERNT Nl.llllWR 1994
Jim Frit-xe, C;ountyy Attomey
e~~ Consider appmvaP.
0. O1V AWWfWNC3 DRAIANG oFCoLLI.ATERAL
OF LETTER OF CRED1T 915-8162 F012 .IIM GUID4
CO TION FOR RDAD CllT PEfZI1NT NIAVISEt 1888
Jim Eritze, County e4ttomey
ACTION: Consider approval.
F- RF-S ON CONCERMNG APPOINTIIfENY'1S
Joe VMnstead, Extension
KathIeen Forinash, Social Senric~
ACTIONe Consider appmval.
-
F. RD APPRO/141e AND CONTRAcT ExEcllTIOIV FOR
WYESTERN M0811E IVQR'THEM INC. FQR ASPI-IALT AND
CR#CK-SEAI.INC OF A11RPORT MOVEIIIENT AREA SIV
NCr1Oi11 Wf T-i THE DMS[ON OF AVA-n0N GRAN'T
. D-an Reynolds, Airport ACTI e Corisider approvd.
3:45 - 4~00 BREAK WORK SESSIOV IJPDATE A,i/ON VILLAGE
. fPeter Jarnar, Jarrar and Associates
Tl-E NEXT f1AEETItdG OF TM FAGLE (XIUVTY COflMA$SUOPEFtS YtLL HE FiELLD OV RaAY 23, 1995
dt1 A1WnNGS VUiLd. HE FfaD IIV THE EAGE COUYTY BUILDWG - 500 BRQl1GA(AY, E/iG1F -O2 41HERWISE iYdTID.
THIS AGHNDA I& F'PUJIQFQ FOR IwOF2haTIaMJU. pJRP05E5 ONLY - ALL TINES AfiE APPRLIXIMA7r,
Y1-IE BQARD 1NHtE IN SESSION WY tXNSM 6THHR fTEUI$ T}A7 ARE BROtDGif BEFORF IT.
SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-16-95 ; 16:18 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 4/ 4
~
May 16, 1995 - 16:27
.
U1U I. f.()i1NIY I11111111NG
RR(U\IIWAY
l)I I I( 7 l)I I Fil: : I'f 1. lif 8~U
6f1Aitl1(11 (:i)MMItiSI(]NIkS .
1 iA(:;I.E.(r.)LiNinu0aiir,{I
(li1S1'i9N nhii5 f ' . IAY:fIl13) i~it ;:,t);°
. .
:=r :y.; .
EAGL~ ~OUNTV, CfJLORAD~
~GENDA
BOMD 0Ft""OUNTY ~IVmS5I0NERQ
REGULAR M NG DAY
Y 2391995
WOW 9~~ -~Oo9~ SESSION - llPDAl'E FRO111I DIS1121CT ATliD
Peler 0918ftvla70d1 9y DA
10.00 -11000 41PPER EAGLE Vi4l.lEY 1NA1ER AUTHORIT1f AND AVON
WATER TREJe1TNEhFT PL/o?NT EXPANSIaIV
RaY Mom Et'evirorwrenta) 9-iealth Offfiou
0Ne Consider appraval.
~ Ua - Ilo
t eW - 3o00 RK IO1A " RCVrlRWIN7 I IY9 i9w.
3o00 ° 3a ll5 BREAK
o~~~S -6:00 a7ESSiV1\°1r¦/~ERDGYGLO [tL7.7/+1RI.JIlMG
I UES WTH FINAL PLAT 9aOMES7EAD FILlNC 11
Fobert Wamer, UVarner Development
SHE NDCT NfEEf1NG OF T1iE EACL.E C=jrY COWAlSS10NERS WLL BE FaD ON IIAAY 3U, 9996
RLL RAEETUVGS IAALL BE HELD IN THE E1G19 Coui(TY BUILDUJO - 5m BR4FIOIAlAY, FAGI.E • OR QTHERIMSE IdOTm.
THIS AGENuA 15 PRC7VIOEn FoFt woF21W1T10PWL F'URMM MbLY - N1. Z1MES ME ANPFCD(IlYW7E
TFE BaARD V1f}illE 1m SESSI(Kd m4Y foNs1DER QiHE3t 17H1hS T1if1T Aw SPoOUGHf BEFciRE IT.
SE,,NT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 5-17-95 ; 12:55 ~ 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 1
, ~ .
CiFFI~F. C7~'199P. 17, 1995 - 13:26 EncIr: cc x,nrrr iwiLrnrvG
CUUN1Y MANACiER 50A RR(7ADWAY
(303) 3"Lti-ri0U5 ti P.O. BnX $50
. f.AC',LL, CGLORADO Rleijl 0850
' fAK (303) 328-72u7
. ! _ F
'v;'',":' '
EAGLE COUNI'Yo COLORADO
MEMOR4NDUM
TO: AlI media and interested parties
FROMe Jack D. Lewis, County Managerje,
DA4E: May 17, 1995 - 13:26
RE: C9~ANGES TO AGENDA FOR E. C. BOAFtp OF COMMISSIOPIERS
The M9owing igem has been addec1 4o Qhe May 22, agenda.
9:90 - AGREEMEbT BETWEEN EAGLE COlDNTY, STATE OF
C0LORADO APdD nAICH~LLE YVRIGHTIAMERICAN
~~~ERATBON OF MIISICIANS FOf$ ElVTERTAINMENT AT
EAGLE COUNTf'S EAIf3
Jar.lt Lewis, County Manager
~~~~ON: ConsideP approvaB.
Iff you have any questaans please call Tom Jenkins, OfFice Assistant at 328-8605. Thank
You!
JDUtj
cc: Board of County CammissionePs
JaPnes R. Fri4ze, County Attamey
,Allen Sartin, Finartce Director
SaPa FISheP, Ceerk & Recarder
Jack ingstam, Pubeic Information Officer
SM BY:EAGLE COU(VTY ; 5-18-95 ~ 10:27 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 1
o ~
AW1 8, ~ 9~5 1.OsJ LAr;LL COUNiY DUfLUING
(~FFICE U SOO ltlLUAUWAY
COUNTY MANACiER
13031 37,8-q<,os I'.i nOX tlso
r'nf,i.r.. CCH.OunrxO x1n31.cWj;o
FAX; (303) 328 '7207
Ee~GLE ~OUNTY, COLORADO
M A
ME~U'rVANDU
70. All media and interested parti~
FROM0 .fack D. Lewis, County Manage 4~~
DATEe May 18, 1995 - 11:05
REo CHABVQES TO AGENbA FQR E. C. BOARD OF COMINISStONERS
The following i4em has been from 4he May 23 agenda.
90:00 - 99:00 4UPPE~ ~GLE VA1.1LEY WATER AUTHORBTY AIVD AIlON
WAg~R TREATAAEIVT PLANT ECPAN1SIOtd
Ray merry, Environmenta! Heslth Officer
ACTlONo Consider approeal.
If you h2de any questions please call Tom Jenkins, 0ffice AssistanY a4 328-8606. lfhank
yau!
JDL/4j
cc: Board of County Commissianers
Ja,mes R. Fri4ze, Goun4y Attocney
Allen SarUn, Finance Director -
Sara Fisher, Cferk & Recorder
Jack IngsQad, Ptablic IrlgorrnaQion Officer
J
e4 •
TOWlil OF UAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Off ce of the Town Manager
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-4 79-2105 / FAX 479-2157 MEIVIORANDUIVI
TO: Vail Town Council
FRO1V[: Pamela A. BrandmAssistant Town 1Vlanager
DATE: May 17, 1995
RE: Joint Work Session with PEC
re: Golden Peak R,edevelopment
The Golden Peak redevelopment plan has been submitted to the Community Development
Department. The first work session with the Planning Commission is set for Monday, June
12, 1995, at 2:00 p.m. A site visit will precede this meeting, at a time still to 'ne determined
that morning. At this meeting, Council is invited to observe and make comments in regard
to some items that may be of interest, i.e., for salelprivatized parking passes (125); lack of
road improvements between the Golden Peak parldng lot and the soccer field Iot; and others.
Again, this is an early warning notice for Council's convenience that may allow you to attend
the initial Planning Commission review for this important project.
PAB/aw c:bam\„amos\fc
ee
a4
TOWN OF VAdL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157
FOR WMED@ATE RELEASE
May 17, 1995
Contact: Jeff Bowen, 476-2701
Jonathan Staufer, 476-5622
fViike fViollica, 479-2138
Todd Oppenheimer, 479-2161
!lO~UNTEERS NEEDED JIJfVE 17 FOR FOl3RTH ANNUAL
TREES FOR VAOL PLe41VTINC
(Vail)--Vail's fourth annual community tree planting project, organized by Trees for
Vail, will be Saturday, :lune 17, and will be at a new and different type of location.
Trees for Vail has picked a steep road cut on the North Frontage Road, just west of the
iViountain Bell Tower, for its 1995 planting site.
Organizers Jeff Bowen and Todd Oppenheimer said Trees for Vail wanted to tackle
the road cut because it was one of the ugly remaining evidences of Interstate
construction, and, it would offer an excellent proving ground for new types of foliage
and a planting strategy that could be used in future years.
The plan this year is to place approximately 100 trees and shrubs on a bench in the
road-cut, then spade-plant more than 1,000 small natural ground-cover plants in the
steep sections. What is additionally exciting is that Kay Rehm has agreed to organize
a group which will plant native perennial flowers along with the other plants, so the .
beauty will be instantaneous.
Trees for Vail is hoping for 200 or more volunteers this year, including young people, ,
(more)
Trees for Vail/Add 1 -
for installing the small plants will be a great activity for children, who are the ultimate
beneficiaries of Trees for Vail. Each volunteer will receive a T-shirt, and will be treated
to a box lunch and a barbecue at the end of the day. No advance registration is
needed; simply arrive at the Red Sandstone School parking lot around 8:30 a.m. with
work gloves and a shovel or spade, if you have either.
Trees for Vail was created as a public-private partnership in 1992 to help beautify the
I-70 corridor. Since then, nearly 1,000 trees, shrubs, and saplings have been planted
by community volunteers with sponsorships by the town, many businesses, and
contributors.
For more information, call the town's Community Development office at 479-2138, or
any of the Trees for Vail board members: Jeff Bowen, 476-2701; Mike Mollica, 479-
2138; Jonathan Staufer, 476-5622; or Todd Oppenheimer, 479-2161.
# # #
o .
C
dd
e4
TOWN OF ~AIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157
FOR OMMED9ATE RELEASE
iVlay 17, 1995
Contact: Jody Doster, 479-2174
Transit Operations Coordinator SUMME92 BUS SERVICE BEG9NS MAY 27
(Vail)--The Town of Vail will implement its summer bus schedule beginning Saturday,
. Niay 27. The free summer service will be offered daily through November 19.
The in-town shuttle connecting Vail Village and Lionshead will run from 6:30 a.m. to 2
a.m. daily at a frequency of every 15 minutes.
Service on most outlying routes will begin as early as 6 a.m. and run as late as
midnight. An additional late night route will depart from the Vail Transportation Center
at 2 a.m.
Specifically, outlying schedules are as follows:
West Vail Green (south to north) runs at 6:10 a.m., 7:30 a.m., 8:50 a.m.,
10:10 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 12:50 p.m., 2:10 p.m., 3:30 p.m., 4:50 p.m., 6:10 p.m.,
7:30 p.m., 8:50 p.m., 10:10 p.m. and 11:30 p.m. from Vail Village transportation center.
West Vail Red (north to south) runs at 6:50 a.m., 8:10 a.m., 9:30 a.m.,
10:50 a.m., 12:10 a.m., 1:30 p.m., 2:50 p.m., 4:10 p.m., 5:30 p.m., 6:50 p.m., 8:10 p.m.,
9:30 p.m., 10:50 p.m. and 12:10 a.m. from Vail Village transportation center.
Sandstone runs at 6:40 to 8:40 a.m.; 10:40 a.m. to 12:40 p.m.; 2:40 p.m.; 4:40 to
(more)
'
Summer Bus Schedule/Add 1
6:40 p.m.; and 10:40 to 11:40 p.m. from Vail Village transportation center.
East Vail Express runs from 6 a.m. to midnight with service every hour.
Go/f Course runs from 7:35 a.m.; 9:35 a.m.; 11:35 a.m. to 1:35 p.m.; 3:35 to
5:35 p.m. and 7:35 to 9:35 p.m. from Vail Village transportation center.
Bike racks will be installed again this year after a successful pilot season a year ago
only on outlying buses. Due to safety concerns, rollerbladers will be asked to take their
blades off while boarding and unloading.
The town also operates a wheelchair lift-equipped paratransit van service for those
who are unable to use the fixed route buses. For information please call 479-2358.
For additional information on the summer schedule, call the town's 24-hour bus line
at 328-8143. # # # .
0
1995 >
S~Jl~1~IER B~JS f~i
~~3~;CE7t~RS~. . .
jl ~~HE~~LE 6:40A-8:40A-10:40A-12:40P.2:40P_ 7:33A-9:35A-II:35A-1:35P_
°EAST VAIL ° WEST VAIL ° SANDSTONE ° ,:~p'6:~p~: ~P-10:60P-I1:4OP 3:35P-5:33P•7:35P-9:35P
° GOLF COURSE ° VAIL VILLAGE/LIONSHFAD ° Trans rtation Center :40 Trans ation Center :35
Sandstone School :43 Hanson Ranch Road :37
UrJ~ ~AR E 1 B'Kgl J S 0 Red Sandstone Road :45 Golden Peak :38
Avoid parking hassles, traffic congestion and the high costs of dail View/Red Sandstone :47 Soccer Field :39
Sandstone Creek Club :49 Ptartni an West :40
dtiving by riding wilh us every day Simba Run :50 Ptarm an East :41
~
US 5C~..IED~E ~O~A,g,gON, Vail Run :51 1448 Vail Valley Drive :42
Sandstone Schod :53 1610 Sunburst Drive :43
Supmisora office: 479-2339 Lost and Found: 479-2358 ' T18ns ati0n Cellter :00 Club House :qs
Operolions Meneger: 479-2174 24 Hour Bus Infortnation: 328-8143 1610 Sunburst Drive ;47
Bus vider infonnation: 1448 Vail Valle Drive :48
~Alt Be early to your bus stop, wratches Ptarmi an East :50
may vary. We set our Gme to Ptarmi an West :51
Runc ot: Runo ol: Ru~o ot:
e:10a r.aoa o:yua Boulder Standard Time, 499-7111. Soccer Field :53
1010e, »:soa 12:50v Actual arrival times may vary Golden Peak :55
6:10A - 11:30P 2:10P 3:30P 4`5013 due to tranc, construction and Vortaufer ;56
8:10P 7:30P O:SOP
+0:10v »:aor weather conditions. Trans rtation Center :00
Trans rtation Center ;~p ;gp
Vail AAunici I Buildin
:12 :32 :52
Concert Hall Plaza :14 :34 :Sq 6:00~? - 112:00~?
Cascade Crossin :~g Trans
Cascade Ylla e ;18 .38 ~ rtation Center :QO
Matterhom .21 .41 .01 As n Lane ;05
Ptarmi an :23 :03 Booth Falls :06
Unde ss .25 Falls At Vail :Og
Intermountain PRkin Creek Park ;10
27 :47 :07 Lu ine/Bi hom Road :11
RAeadow Creek :29 :49 :09 Unde ss Columbine/Bi hom Rd :12
:31 :51 :11 Streamside Circle ;13
Chamoniu :33 :53 :13 Timber Falls :14
West Vail Lod e :35 :55 :15 Rac uet Club ;15
Vail Das Schone :36 :56 ; 1g BI hom Park g
Buffehr Creek 37 :57 17 Meadow Lane East :17
Timb2r Rid e .qp .00 L-56 Sandstone School Meadow Orive :18
:42 :02 Main Gore / Juni r :19
Trans rtation Center :50 :10 Main Gore / Bi hom :21
Rac uet Club Tovmhomes :22
ei hom Rd / Streamside E. :23
Runo or. Runo ot: R,,,,, o,: Columbine / BI hom Rd :24
e:g°A 0:10A 0:30A Vail East Condos ;25 ,
p 1o:soa 12:10P 1:30P Pitkin Creek Park :26
6.70Pq ° 1210A 2:90P 4101) 8:70P '
8:90P O:/OP e:wP Falls At Vail :27
10`e0° 12.110A Booth Falls .29
Trens rtation Center Bald PAountain ;30
.30 Trans rtation Center :35
Sandstone School :53 :13 33
Timb2r Rid e :56 :16 36 ~,;A....~..7..: .r.: ~...E..;:~......;b..: ..c: ^.:..C..
Post Office :57 :17 37
West Vail Mall
00 _p.
20 :40
Chamoniz '03 :23 :43 At 2:00 a.m. 4he Town Of Vail will rovide two buses at the
Unde ss :05 :25 ;45 Vail Transportation Cenfer. One bus will go to East Vail and the
intermountain :07 :27 :47 Golf Course. The other bus will go to West Vail and Sandstone.
RAeadow Creek :Og .29 ;qg These buses wilt onl run if 4here are assen ers at 2:00 a.m.
Unde ss :11 :31 :51
S ruce Creek :12 32 :52
AAattertiom :14 The'H'osaae Ot Vrail operaees
Ptarm' an :16 36 :56 awheeEe9aa6P Bb6B eqanipped
Spruce Creek :17 :37 :57 pam6aaaosae van seawice foP
Cascade ViIla e :19 ;39 ;5g those w6eo are nawab[e 60
Cascade Crossin :21 :41 :Ot
Concert Hall use the 9ised Pourte buses.
23 :43 :03
Munici I Buildi .25 .45 :05 FOP BtBOBe p9BfOrB94at9011 CBBI:
Trans ation Center :30 :Sp :10 479-2174 0r 479-2358
:
~TlJgtfe . VaeV Vallage /L6onshead `£~I'S A'fl' ~EESIGIVA~ED BUs S''flPSQ.
_ a
.
R
u
ns
eve 15 mi ;
VIV
~Y nutes from 6• .30A 40 2..00A ;;Please arse <:::sto uesf:::on:;auN n.>ruutesP1
\
dd
e4
TORW OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road , Dffice of the Mayor
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21 DO
FAX 303-479-2157
May 10, 1995
Mr. Bob Moroney .
1Vlanager
Vail Athletic Health Club
352 E. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Bob:
On behalf of the Vail Town Council I wanted to take this opportznity to express.our deep and sincere
appreciation for your work on the Volunteer Adopt-A-Path Prograr.z and the Stranded Motorist
Program. Your work in these areas is another example of your outstanding cor.:m-:tment to our
community. We are most fortunate to have individuals such as yau in Vail. Your wcrk in these areas,
on the Trees for Vail project, and your work with the Town Manager regarding the use of equipment
policies are most.appreciated by the other members of the Cour_cil and me. We are most fortunate to
have you in. our community.
Once again, let me express our sincere thanks for all your work to make Vail the finest moLntain
community in America.
Sincerely,
TO F VAIL
Margare . sterfoss
Mayor
1VIA0/aw
xc: Vail Town Council
e
dd
e4
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Nail, Colorado 81657 .
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157 .
TO: Mr. Merv Lapin lt'Ir. Jan Strauch
Vail Town Council Vaii Town Council.
1VIr. Peter M. Abuisi lbir. Eric Fredell
Headmaster Principal
Vail 1Vlountain School Batfle IVlountain H;gh Sc'r.ool
iV[r. Robert Bandoni ivir. ionn C. Heity
Assistant Hes.d*a-+pr _ Superintendent of Scnools, RESpJ
Vail 1Vlountain School
FROIVI: Paul John ston
DATE: May 23, 1995
AE: Consolidation of Feedback
To all of you who have responded with your thoughts, suggestions an3 summative repcc:-is, my deepest
thanks. With the school year over, perhaps we can put our h2ads tcgether again this summer and
have a program in place by September.
I am including copies of an original concept ou*line as well as the individual reapc:.ses you sent in.
I think it is important to review some of the points discussed that might still have *n-Irit, even though
the program appears to be taking dramatic shifts.
* Recognition or awards presented at schoollgraduatian iunctions
* Junior year recognition relevant for college applications
*"Mayor's .Task Force on Youth" may be an approp:-iate title
* Internship experience within the community, private!public, should be ccas:3ered
* Community service is a key component
* Need an evaluation/selection committee
* Need an accountability committee
* Should there be small scholarship dollars for such a larbe group of studer.ts?
I believe Jan's proposal for the TOV to supply funding and suppcrt personnel is the operative key to
such a vision becoming a reality. If you are able to formulate any additional concepts or constructs,
do not hesitate to forward them to' me through the TOV.
Let's think in terms of an early July meeting. If you could please advise us of operable meeting dates,
time of day (or night), that would be helpful. To those of you in the academic world, cangratulations
on surviving another year! To the rest, enjoy springtime in the Rockies! Paul
Attachments
' • ~
a
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY YOUTH LEADERSHIP AWARD
Given annually-to promote broad based excellence
in young adults, stimulate interest in high school
programs, and increase the awareness, importance,
and par"ticipation by teen=agers in local service
projects, towards creating better more informed future
community leaders. ~ .
REQUIREMENTS•
° Citizen of Vail Colorado
° Open to any student attending high school in Eagle
County
° Enter compe~!~Cion by February 1st of Freshman year
, with minimum criteria.
° Awarded annually in May to 1(or more) Juniors based
on excellence in:
1. Basic core academic courses
2. Extra-curricular courses such as music, art,
drama, speech,...
3. Athletics
4. Community service such as world cup volunteer,
Vail Clean Up/Tree Planting, Rotary Inter-act,
ect...a (Specific pre-determined qualifying
programs that require dedication)
AWARD
$10,000!
In the form of a five year bond/annuity/CD/other
to be used to start in.business, a family,
post-graduate education, or other personal desires!
NEXT STEP
1. Approve concept
2. Name
3. Imput from local schools
4. Fund
5. Announce February 1st 1995 to all qualified
students and parents..
6. Choose 1st winner April 15th 1997!
• MAR 29 '95 12:58 VAIL MOUNTAIN SCHOL 4763860 p,z
• . I
, I.
~ . . ;
MEMORANDgJM . I
TO: Paul Johnston .
F~Ohi* Peter Elbuisi .
RE: 11Reeting Swnrnary "
DATE: March 29, 1995 j
.
t
Thanlc you for including ttie in the meeting to discuss Town of Vail plans for area youth. ~
At your rcquest, I share the fallowing impgessions froln that meeting.
It is my understanding that wrhaY was formerly known as Y}ie Chuck Anderson Youth
Recognition Award 'as being revised and wili no longer anclude Chuck's name. Instead it vuill be
something from the Town of Vail involviatg the Town Cottncil aaid revised wittl a new concept, - My impressions from the meeting include that the trend will be shifYed from a summative
award recognixing boys and girls for a job well done, to providing high school students with
oppommities eo become more involved in the social order. Among the many ideas discussed, the
one receiving the greatest amount of attention was a praposal to create a community "stude8t
council" comprised of rising ninth graders throvgh seniors in high school.. This group inight .
. nuanber frorn eight ta sixteen: The students would be given an opportunicy to become familiar wi41a
goverrirrment at the seate Ievel and locally. Various experiences wQUld be arranged to connect them
with local councalpeople via attending events and by participating in specific service projects. PasRicular eraiphasis was placed on doing service now as a vehicle foa understanding tlnat ninning - -far affice is aai aspect of volunteerism in adulthood; the power accorded to people virho are elected .
is a byproduct of their willangness to serve. There was no consensus of how this group would be.
appainted/elected, nor was there a conclusion as to whether VMS with its small numbeas should be .
represented to an equal or lesser cfegree than the. yauAg people ac B1VlI4S vvhere thcrc are
signi~icantly larger numbers. The suggestion was made thai students not be considered according
to whcre they attend school, but rather based upon the quatity of their applieation.
Ile feeling seemed to be that rather than give an award to any one student who serves in
this capacity, the "reward" would stem from the opporkunities afforded to the young peopla who serve on tlus couneil. Vdhat might be givea is a certificate of successful participation. In
supnmary, the conversation at the meeting moved firom one about pa.SE avvards to a dialogue about
giwing local high sehoolers an opportunity to get to know governmene while also serving the -
coarimuniey. Y look fprward to the next discussion.
PMA/ty
~
0 .
03/28/1995 09:05 3039491550 BMHS PAGE 01 •
~ Tr~~,' . ~
P.O. 8ox 249 / 750 Eagle Road Mintum, Colorado 81645 (303) 949-4490
Dr. Erik S. Fredell - Principal Mr. Gerald Schmidt
Ms. Ronda S. Woodail - Assistant Principal Ms. Judy Caligiuri
Mr. Robert Isbel! - Athletlc Director Guidance Counselors
MEMORANDUM
TO: Paul Jvhrison, Town of Vail
FROM: Erik Frodell
TOPIC: Thoughts on the Chuck Artderson Award
DATE: Mar6 L395 -
Thank you Por including me on the discussian oP the Chuch
Anderson Youth Award last weak. The following are my thvughts on
our discussion the other day:
* Does TOV want the responsibility far an onqoing
program and its inherent staff and financial needs?
* Thougp Isupport the need for leadership training for all
students, is this the appropriate venue?
* Is there adequate commitment from studel°its to fa2law this
, program thraugh ta the end? Will we have el7ough
activities, programs, etc. to hold a yaung person
through-all four years?
• The person who wauld coardfnate t.his program would need to
be a person with a background with adoYescents and some
tr.aining in working with teams.
* enle must create a fiexible entry/exit process to allow for
the tremendous influx/exodus of students irt aur schools
* Are there exitinq models of teen leadership proqrsms that
we could benefit from.studying?
I quess thi~ just illustrates the Pact that "the more you know,
the ].ess yo%~ knew.n I hope these age helpful and not too
confusing for your small group to garner some ideas from.
Look forward to hearing tram you in the neag future.
"The Pride of Eastern Eag/e County; ?n a Class by Oursalves"
i
I
e uI$ :[ijiiJa 19:z1 '&3U3 aYb 1U14 EAGLE CU SCHOOLS Q001/001
~ AESAIC;L.E COLJNTY SCHOOI. DISTR.ICT RE 50J
kJOHMN E-EF1Y - SUPERMMME-rr P.O. BOX 740 - FAGLF_ COLpRADO 81631 a (303) 32"321 o FRX (303) 328-1024
- XC: C&tt-a-f,
MarCh 74, 1995 Q
J~
RRP. Pdul IOhnstOri
TOtAIII Of @/ffiil
'S S. FrO11Y8$C R67~~
VA wOSadO BM7
DCar Fauk
IIvogr ffibach apprecmed boing pag og the group that met oa Thnrsday, RRardi 23, L995, to re-think the Chuuck
Anderson YouthAwaad. Mwagr wmthwbile ideas weee sbared. Here: are ffiy doughts scpadinB edeas tbat may
$ave promnse-
1. Perhaps an c s macum xous on ataaineaining and izopeoein8 the qv~ttJ? of life cou9d be put forwmrd as
the seasfln foa the existence of the group. Maintaiaiag and impraving the quaIity of lifc is appareatlY
axe atr.ffi of coacean ffiroiaghout ehe County. It seeins to ffie tha[ youag people ewouId be cflncerned about
the cguality of IifE for yrov3h in Bagle Couaty. Also, OeY magr have somc fresh adeas about ways eo
nasintaea and impeo,e the qualaty of life foe all catizem an the Cqt?n4y,
~
2. If the rcasm fop the cxistenc~ og t1u goup is maiatainiag and impoving the qnality of life an Eag1e
Caun2y aad ebai reasoa ic sandioned and honored by a body lilce the Va~il T'awss Connci'], partici,patioa
eakea oa more meaning. Yg the Couna7 actually solidts the gQad thiakinB of the studeut membecs of
this grouP vhen addxessing paoblems related to the qual"aty of bfe in Vail and the Couaty, ffieatbership
and particapageoa an the group eakes oa greae signiGcance.
3. Young people wh,n opeSate as Yole mmdels for other youeh wane ¢o ffiakc a difference mma 2bear
eommeanitics. Ig e}eag groap is gives the aP1ommi4Y te malcc a diffcrence, membeaship wlll be attractivc
eo the yosaeh i,L the am&
4. Soffie individuai os sffi$ll goup of kdiv;duais w71hlc1y need eo provide organiaational and 1ogistacal
supporY for ghe group. Someoae sn11 aeed eo handle the commanication, the schednl* the agenda
buildang, and, nn mme cases, the snpcrvi5ion of variou astavedes.
5_ If seems to ffie thg we aeed io be clear about the seasoaa fog the existeace of the group !and the
expeeted sesnles ffor group ffiembers and the commuaity befare we determine 4 of the ogeraaonai
~etafils.
'Y'hese are nay [houghYs at ihas taffie. I hogse they are_helpfuL Yf you need eo.hade me elaboaate on asy of theaa,
pleass givc me a call. Again, IIwaw 6o iadicaee that I aPPreciaee ehe opporttmigy to be aawked.
~in~a~l~,
i
~C
ug~aten e)
BCH/dd
1 .
9
T0: PAUL JOHNSON
DATE: 1 MAY 1995
FROM: Jan Strauch
RE: VAIL COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL PROJECT
Looking,over my notes and the summaries from Peter Abuisi and John
Hefty, I think there is general agreement and, enthusiasm for
r.estructurin5 the old Chuck Anderson Youth Award into a more
dynamic educational.__foruin where the emphasis would dramatically
shift from a passive recipient role to one of active engagement. We
would create an opporturiity for local high school leaders to learn
about, participate in, ar,d provide a new youth perspective on how .
a corru-nunity is o•rganized and how it solves problems and ideritifies
and achieves it's future goals.
:dore specifi•:!jT suggest the following outline as something
to distribute ar,d flesi'l out into a more formal plan:
NAME: VAIL YOU"H LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
PURPOSE: Restatement of above, adding to build community values,
responsibility,knowledge of the political process, team building,
dialogue, cnaracter, service.
ELIGIBILITY: BaiL'le Mt and VMS sophomores, juniors, seniors
nominated by high school principals on grade point average,
demonstrated leadership capabilities, interest, and
SELECTIOI3: Nominees would be interviewed and selected by Vail Town
Council in September 1995 to provide group of 12-18 initial
members. New members would be selected each following September
with participation of existing appointees. Goal would be to provide
balance betwee.n men and women and-between valleywide schools.
RECOGNITICN: Patch for blue blazer (as part of official dress
code/uniform for ofiiciai functionscertificate of participatior..
Annual dinner.
FUNCTIONS:
" Attend annual youth :eadership conference
" Vail Town,Council Orientation Day.
" Eagle County Government Orientation Day
" Day with Town Manager
Trip to Denver to meet local congressmen, governor, etc
~ Speakers program (special or as al~eady scheduled)
` Assignment to community projects: •
VAIL 99, Rotary Club, Special evFnts, social projects, etc.
' Dis::ussion groups to "bring closare" to all these items.
' Internal salection of leaders and group goals with one major
project each year.
' Meet incoming dignitaries.
" Lead hiqh school f;"orurns (or sur~~-- -,o determine needs/cancerns
i' 1
, Of va112}' }'Gufii :i:=:. :iaE'.i ileip Yc::i)iV2.
~ Other ,
b
0
FUNDING: Vail Town Council would fund all costs to potentially
include part tim,~ administrator.
~NEXT STEPS: Lets get all the written ideas 1-ogether and fine tune
a proposal to discuss again with the previous committee and then
the other council peop:e.
Hope this is helpful towards that end!
4
~
r
Z°r1~s~~
EDITOR'.S NOTES
. )ohn P Sheehy Publisher
Merv A. Cravson Edltorial Dlnetar ~ kurcn CorJncr Editor
.
, Spse1N Projects Editor
News
WhoEllen 'llSa~~e the Children? Weismun
Geri Aston, Jeffrev Green, ICevin Murrey,
k:lizebcth Oplatla
• ' ' . CopY Desk
, llugh Cavaneug6, Kevin Swecncy, .
` Ghuclc Watcrs -
SIaH Aasistant Fced llaes
' Clrculatlon'Kethryn Con[cr ~RAT-A-TAT-TAT-TAT." TIIE SOUiVD OF MACHINE- COIT1IIlOri th8ITle: Tlley flTC COIIlITlllriltY , S. . Waahinaton StaN -
gun fire, the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, efforts representing collaboration, imag- Famn K~tres4 c„ry ~.gg;m
AI Capone.... Before Michael Jordan, ination and early intervention. oa.san Dlroctor Kmmyi Lcc
Produetion .
this was tlie image that Chicago inevitably One way that ti-ustees may start reach- ,-M„n;,, w~~l, lli~e voung,
argare[ Jeblonski
~ conjured up throughout the world. It took ing out to their communities is highlighted -
- :
us three NBA championship titles to live in "A Seat at the Table" (Pag / e 10l, 1 ~1V EdHOrlal Advlwry Board '
Creig dcrJccr. 7cmcsecc Hmpiral Aswcintioa \mLvillc;
Nelpb Rinns, 13ethada Ilmpiiel loc_ Cincinnaii; Dick
down A1 Capone, and now we're back Lauren Yhillips, which discusses how sev- C~~~,,,~~tW,sh;ng,onH,d;c,lCe,,,m, .
wliere we slurtcd. crul hos itals use communit advisor `'°'""""`~""°`"°~u°"'s,0a~c°°''"°"'"`~.
~ y y ~ ~ynnnis, Mn; rrmkric C. D.eyer 1.., chedmn ~ lmiih
p__ _ ~ Sysmm.+ end Charlmo Mcmorinl hlarpital. }'ull Nivcr,
Exce t it's wore-.-__ ^~w the boards.
~ MA; Mcrrill Ceppmnvcr. Uteh Vallcy Ncqiuml NeJirvl
murder victims are children-272 kids Advisor boards can ta into the Gmer, Provo, anJ Intennoumnin Ilrahh Cero,
Y P s„i, 4,ke ciw: Marv, Ne.i wttkinson. c:opiey Heeith
under 20 years old in 1993, according to diverse resources of a communitY and s"""°`"`.."'°'"s"'ll°,Vr;J°"'° D F'°`"`"."`0c`s'
Medicel f nmq Tulsn, OK; R. Kem f Ienslee. Ged.den
the Chicago Police De >artment. And far rovide a fresh ers1'1ective on a health (AL) Regionel MediuJ Cenrer: h'rences N. HoQman.
b 1 P P C !'runklin Gcnerul Honpital, M.np,on, IA: lohn U.
. t00 OftCtl; LhCSC ICldS f1fC care orbQanization's mis- I,eecn. J.o., Ilealih Ilill Iiarpiial (nr Childrcn, "
ClcvclunJ; Willinm W. Mnwx.'I'Lc )1cUuvcll I lwpiml.
Sl IIl 1 117 L}1C W COII~T ; 5101] 3I1C~ TOle IIl YI1C COIR- ~'a'. NC; k:cith L. McRuLcns, Uullua (:u.wry
~ y b I Iospital. Perry. IA: Jena L. Miichell. M.D.. I ledem
L - HosNitnl Cwmr, ticv York City: EliznLcih Mulu~s,
place at the wrong time. F munity. And LhI'Ollall Criunen Mcdiuil Cenmr, M-, IU; Srophcn E. Nunui,
Last year the Chica- their advice and the net- Milrore (cr) nmPiml Inc.; A;chern B. sh..e, somerset
, +~~ical ce„ter, sooicmue. u: cluiria swe. cod .
: . • .
o Triburee made an edi- work of contacts these ShcpheniGuwmwii~yHospitul,Hennisron.ON;Juhn
: g Vihinen, Hudond (V'f) Reginnal Siulical Cemer
,
` torial decision to run a board mc?nbcrs brim,
b , . . Advertising Salea Stak . . front-page story every with them, tTllStCeS C$R yice President oi Sales and Muketfna:
time a child was the vic- gain closer ties to their st°°°° J. Me^ds"
Direetor of Sales: ~
rim of a homicide. On far communities. _ J;n, Ek.„i,
[00 many mornings, I Such tics are the cen- saie. eeo.e.e~ee:ive.:
' drank my morning cof- terpiece of the Healthy Miaaie Atlantic/Nor?hemstern
M.I. :wmca Associates mc.
fCC UVCC SlOI1CS Ol /lI'1VC- Communities initiative, 155Souih WhimHorsePike'
by shootings, stabbings, as Tyler Norris explains R"l'"' NJ 080` (009) 768 y"i0
rupc and olher forms ol' in uCreating the Build- (B,,,,,,Y) M;cnoii
1117 Pcrimctcr Centcr, Wm4 Sth F'loot t:eH
violence. The victims were infants, tod- ing Blocks for Health» (page 16).Trustees Ailanw, CA 30338 (404) 3923349 '
dlers, and, mostly, teenagers. across the country are discovering that Lo.e. Mie.e.:
If ou live in a ciryo ou have undoubt- the factors most responsible for their com-
737 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 700 . .
edly shared my horror. But even if you . munity's health lie outside the doors of IL 60611 (312) 440•6800
live in the suburbs or the country, you the institution. °p~~~ ' .
probably haven't escaped the spread of When die victims of violence are lucky, Cf 3~~ N; 11bo i i~ai2j 4~0
~cx,
violence in your coininunity. our ernergency department physicians w,s,e,,,
Surveys eonducted across the country and staff can patch up the bullet holes. Hen*r c. eacnen ,
Danu FAchen .
repeatedly document that communities' But that comes at an awfully high price ' 444 N. ?amhmont aiva, sUi« ios
Lus Angcles, CA 90004 (213) 461-0961
number one concern is crime and vio- to everyone. It makes a lot more sense to ,.„u;,,.tt (11WI „o„ .3674) pJ&4n1 n.wnLly.aqx 1..
Liixrl iuw in lnh/Anpni md \mnnlrrA}md.r I..
: Icnce, "pcci;illy as it rclate5 to chili-lren. kecp onr chil,;ren safe and healthy in the I1,.y,iielPnl,liMldyL...7371.)IkLi~n A-_Cfi.~ IL ~1 1.
: '301.1nii .1iiX-rnniI I-,mil A-ini:x. jvuaF.
Bui wl?al caii cutniuunilics du? WliuL will lirst plucc un, IatLuck lltc ruut cuuaca ol' ,~~~~~~~Chu„- ~~~i-^. ,~~ri,^~••^ ~z-I^,A
r-iF, sw.uu. ,w fin.ip, .r, m i. i..i..ut i' -4. I'Mi.id"l m4,ie. tiS.IXI. /'+ymiF6, 1'1'1.:. Aurriru. Nryinl
make a difference? . violence. H~4~4~,K.w.;,~,,.,.....,.1..,,,_as..1.
~ lii our covcr slory, "Violciicc in tl?c '1'Ix; aood ucws is that communities ~.-H.6"Fr-fl•1•4~~i.1- ,,,,,,;,,C-- 4--k.1,•.
,w.• (:.m ` . .~,I
Streets: What Can Communities Do?" can do that. These storie~ ~s well as oth- M~~~" Clw.~dA~LIm.::...,,,~we...~..
'i _ii, i..n'iw srri. 737 N. uKW,w er... sw,.
700. (1-,. u. o0u11..~d ~ b-d 1.bw..- K.riw ~n. 4a
(page 6), Norra Tancienhaus describes ers in future issues prw f it. T vki- . A aA~ w- - iMWw ts.
-4e' ~ m~aiml. F'INTI,\tiTF.R avd rMlm~ ~iwµe+
some innovative solutions-ones that ~O ~+~~F ++egsnM.737N. %14i.irn.. n.,.. s,n, aoo. ce..p, n.
C) 41WII.T~Iryd-.-.(312) 440.WNp.11..114u4n1.rry~I11..11wn _
6 um -..nrihn11..y dL. ~d-d Mmnirau lYyud INdd'uhuu
beyond building bigcer prisons, enacting lar mdvburcruilbqwidA.+.iaYv~.Allnuvrid'mflWuupd,r
.imdahirc:~nu~ni.IvniLll.iuk~nlr..ln IRi.vn.ut.Mdww
,a~tougher sentences and hiriuQ more ~~olice. J 4,~;h~~rc~mW~"yn~, .,~~"~,14•~~' ~•~w~M~M
.,a.x'w: nw...l. yynryu'v~ ~nf...:xrl .IwiLl lr vwilinl.
Although the programs that 1'annen- Princed in the U.S.A. V/BPA
• haus discusses are unique, tt?ey have one
2 Trnstee April 1995
SENT BY:EAGLE COLNTY ; 5-22-95 ; 16:30 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 1
UFFlc:Eftt~~ 1995 - 17.02 t:AC;LLCUIINTiYBllll.l)ING
LUUNIY MAIVAC;GR S()p UKOADWAY
0031 77.8-flFiO i . ~ . I'.(_). lSC)X 850
Enc"., C(a.c)Rnnosi63i-t%%o
' FA?(: (307) 32A-77.07
- +i ~ - -
~~GLE COUNTY, COLORADO
MEMORANDUM
TOe AV( nvdia and interested parties
FRM JaMay cc D. Q..eWs, County Nianager DATE: 27, 1995 -17:02
CHAW-EES TO -A F F_ C ~F CQMSSIQIVM
The fol9oWrg atern haEr been added tm the May 23, 1995 agenda.
AMENDED AND REST/aTED DE TVON OF
C CREEK RANCHD FILJNG 1,2,394
Jac~c Lewis, County klanaqer
AC11 o Consider appraval. If you have any quesfiions p@ease call Tam Jenlams, Office ASSistant at 32848605. Thank
you!
JDLL.6q .
cc: Board of C-ounty Corrnissioners
James R. Fritze, County Attomey
Allen Sarfin, Fnance Dre,Ltor
Sara isher, aetk & Recorder
Jwc @ngstad, Ptabl9c Infonrsatism Officer
RECEIVED P,1~;~, ~ X6: Cnu~~~ R a r- , T"1 W
6tUTAK ROGK
A PARTNERSHIP
INCLUDiNG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS KANSAS CITY
SUITE 2900 . LIT7LE ROCK
717 SEVENTEENTH STREET New VORK
OKLAHOMA CITY
DENVER, COLORADO 80202-3329 OMAMA
PHOENIX
303-297-2400 PITTSBUFGH
FACSIMILE 303-292-7799 WASHINGTON
COLORADO SUPREMF, ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ AMIENDMENT I
'd'he Colorado Seapreme Couat today delivered ats first ruling clarifying enterprise status under Amendment fl. T'he principal holdings of Nichodl v. E-470 Paeblac Flaghway Asetthoraty are:
(1) '&'he IE-490 Public Haghway Authority does not qtaalify as an enterprise because the
Authoriey has the powP Yo levy °general eaxes. QThe fact that the Authority has not exercised
its pou+ea to levy such taxes did not affect the court's ruling.
(2) 'Me 1986 lmnds thae were originally isse?ed by Arapahoe County eo finance the E-470
highvvay may be gemarke$ed vvitbout voter approval because the renaarketing, pursuane to
agreements an place long before Amendment 1 was adopted9 does noe create a new (post-
Ameadment fl) finat?caal obligation.
(3) Redenues used to pay debt service on the 1986 bonds and to pay the costs of
operatiag and maintainang the highvvay aae outside the Authority's Amendment 1 revenue and
spending limits becaease the collectlon and spend'eng of such revenues are part of the pre-
Pmendmene 1 obligataon represeneed by ttie 1986 tmnds.
Other aspects of the case of interest to Colorado governments include nalings that (a) noa-
eaterprise revenue bonds payable from general governmental revenues are financial obligations that must
be voted under the Ameadffient, (b) debe service on honds and other financaal obligations is not subject
to the fiscal year spending flimits of the Amendment, (c) the eeceipe and ezpenditure of bond proceeds
does not impact fiscal year spend'eng undec the Amendment, (d) the court clearly rejected a holding of
the trial eourt thai would haee pgeveated aay eaeity operating an "essentaally goveramental activity" such
as a publlc highvvay feoffi aualaffvine as aa enteaprise and (e) fees (and presumably taxes) that were
approved by dae voters prioa to Ybe a,doptaon of Amendment 1 are eoter-approved revenue changes even
if approved prioe to Yhe 1992 daee specified 'en section (7)(b) of the Amendmene.
Kutak Rock is bond counsel for the E-470 Public Highway Authority and the firm responsible
for the Amendment fl analysis wlth respece to the Arapahoe County bonds in this case. Kutak Itock also served as couassel to the following entities that filed an amiaas curiae brief before the Supreme Court:
City and County of Deneeg, Colorado Association of 1Vlunicapal dJtilities, Colorado Association of School
Boards, Colorado Community Revitaliaation Association, Colorado FIealth Facilities Authority, Colorado
liRunicipal League, Noathglenn Urban Renewal Authority, Paeblo County and Special District Association
of Colorado. If yoia bave questions regarding this case, any of otber matter involving the application of
Amendment 1 co public finance, please feel fxee to contact a ffiembes of our Denver Public Finance
Department.
KU'TAK ROCK PUBI.IC FIRIARICE - DENVER May 15, 1995
05/18/1995 12:19 3034790559 BRAVO COLORADO PAGE 02
. BRAvol .
D~lj
VML V11Ll.I:Y
MlJSIC: f:f-:SI'IV/'1l.
may 18,199s
Mr_ Stan McKinzie
.
TCI Cablcrisioa of tbc Rockies, llnc.
Box 439
Avon, Coloraddo 81620
. IDear 3um,
We wan4 to ftnk you vry much for recomsiderWg support of the Eighth Season of 8he
Bravo! Coloaado Vail Valley Music FeWval. TCl[ has bem such aas important sponsor sance our
inception and we really appamiatc this patronage fi-om one of our Yalley°s rnost fmportant
busimesscs. We°re pleased dw 1ICI will be co-paesenting oaar Family Concr,rt a public seevice
to ehe Vail Valley on Aaagust 3 ae the Gerald R. Ford Amphieheatero
Again, your supgort is vitai ¢o otar suomm and tae welcome your vontinued participation.
g reptds,
gierringeon
Director of Development
cc: Torarn of Vaal Coiaacil
Town of Aeron cCoumal
Mcav l[.apiiai, 'B'owsa og Vufl
C66d6dy lVall7 v°°uy Wa19 Jtddb.
Keng M31Crs, ~eaver C81~~ ReSOPt
ZOhn RRalOYIe,
COll~ Abduhk TU
Braaaa Shark, TU
JoHN w CrovqNDO - F,r-.ti1,clh:m-ro, IAA KAVAFIAN • Murerllimrior
963 Sourh Proncasa Rond Suiie 104 . vo;l. cOlorado . 81657 . p6one 303.476.0206 • Fax 303.479-0359
p~ r.- e„~ ~ ~ L
Vaifl \valley Consolfldated Water Distric~` s+ V . . ,JJ.~
846 Forest Road Vail, Colorado 81657 .
Telephone: (970) 476-7480 Fax: (970) 476-4089
6?~' ~
May 11, 1995 .
Mr. Dick Duran
Vail Fire Deparcment r
42 West Meadow Drive Board of Directors yazl, Colorado 81657
Rick Sackbauer
Chairman
Byron Brown RE: Fire Hydrant Snow Removal
Secretary
Pat. Dauphinais Dear Dick:
Chuck Ogilby
paul Tescwuide Iam writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Vail Valley
General Manager Consolidated Water District to thank you for your past efforts in the
Dennis Gelvin reanoval of snow from fire hydrants and to offer fmancial assistance to
fiature efforts. VVe understand the workload of your department has increased over the
years, while your manpower has not. This has diminished your abiiity to
clear snow from hydrants. We believe, and we understand you agree, that
it is best for snow removal to continue to be performed by the fire
department so that your fire fighters know locations in an emergency.
Also, if necessary to set priorities, you personnel would know best.
So, we conclude that if we could help you in funding the of manpower, we
could enhance the fire hydrant snow removal function. We propose an
intergovernmental agreement under which Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District would pay a mutually agreed upon amount, not to exceed
$25,000, in the winter of 1995-1996, and repeat that amount, plus cost of
living increases each year thereafter in perpetuity (to the extent we can
make such a guarantee under TABOR). In return, you would assume full
responsibility for fire hydrant snow removal in the entire District with the
exception of Gypsum.
CONsERvE
?
The staff and I aze available to meet with you at your earliest convenience.
, We would like this to occur prior to our May 25th Board Meeting. Please
call me at 476-4497 to discuss a date and time for a meeting.
Sincerely,
VAIL VALI,EY CONSOLIDA'd'ED WATER DISTRICT
Rick Sackbauer
Chairman
RS/egw
cc: James P. Collins, Esq.
Dennis Gelvin, General Manager
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
R. Thomas Morehead, Esq. ~ .
COPISERVE 6
_ RECEIV ,a,. . ~ .
,
EAc~LE C~~NTY TRArisPoR~ATIoN sUMMIT
MW7C61RR1 T0WN HALII..
Manutes Q '
may 10, 1995
~ I. Registration and Continental Breakfast
II. Vdelcome and Introductions
Participant List (attached)
III. History and Summary
Review of minutes of ineeting, April 12, 1995.
IV. Regional Budget at Existing and Expanded Levels
A. Presentation by Harry Taylor and Larry Brooks
Regional Transportation - 10 Year Financial Summary Handout (attached)
Operating Assumptions
Facility Impact Assumptions
Regional Transportation Summary
Lease Purchase Model
' Cash Purchase Model
B. Group I3iscussion of the Presentation
The question was asked, what if the tax doesn't pass? Larry Brooks responded that
this was a policy question and as a staff person he could not ezpress an opinion.
The cost could go out of bounds, the system can't go with the status quo. The
system can operate (gas, drivers, etc.) but no replacement of buses and no rolling
stock.
The present buses can't be refurbished. ADA makes you add lifts which is very
expensive and they no longer make an engine to fit in the current buses. They
would not be worth rebuilding.
In two years you are not going to be able to provide the service that you have ,
today and the public needs to understand that.
Eagle Transportation Summit
Minutes, May 10, 1995 .
Page 2
C. Discussion of the .5 Cent Sales Tax
It was decided that a.5 cent instead of the .33 cent sales tax was needed to
adequately fund the bus system.
Several in the group felt that their councils and consrituents would not be open to
any tax increase this year and that the tax should be put on next year during the
regular election. Waiting until next year would also give more time to do a lot
of PR work and to educate the voters.
It was felt that the County needed to focus on the De-Brucing issue on this ballot
and that putting any type of a tax increase on the ballot with it would be like
shooting themselves in the foot.
There was a consensus that the group had a problem with presenting the tax and
now needed to reach a consensus on a solution.
The alternative to a.5 cent sales tax is to continue funding from the general funds
for now. Funding from the general funds will not buy new buses. The buses are
wearing out and without replacements we won't have a bus system.
D. Presentations to Councils and Boards
The group discussed the fact that all of the policy makers are on a different
learning curve depending on their transportation experience and that it would be
important to start educating these groups so that everyone wiil be on the same
page when it comes to decision making.
Everyone thought the data that had been presented was adequate to be used in a
presentation to the policy making groups. It was felt that the term "excess
revenue" should be changed to "fund balance". It was felt that they should use
the .5 cent sales tax in the presentations.
E. Trails Presentation by Ellie Caryf a nd Paul Gotthelf
The Eagle River Valley Trail System Information Sheet (attached)
The Eagle County Trails Plan has a completion timeframe many years down the
road due to the fact that there is no dedicated source of funding.
The costs on the information sheet do not include land acquisition, the entire
_ project-construction and land could cost $7 to 9 million.
i
Eagle County Transportation Summit
- 1Vlinutes, May 10, 1995
Page 3
Group Discussion:
Garfield County has no trails plan, Pitkin County has a plan and a trails tax,
Summit County has been very successful with grants.
, Would it be possible for the fund balance from the transportation tax to go to the
trails project? If we go only with GOCO and Federal Grants it may take 20 years,
at best, to complete the trail through Eagle County.
A transfer.tax cannot be used for this project because the Bruce Amendment says
if you don't have a transfer tax now you can't establish one, it is now in the State Constitution.
PUD funds can oniy be used in the area that the PUD impacts. Development in
Avon has provided for some paths. Much of the path on Highway 6 between
Eagle and Gypsum will be funded by development. A PUD will not give a
complete path project. VA was required to build a trail and it has two ends but
goes no where so no one can use it.
Would it be possible to ask the developer to contribute to the path at a point
where it will do some good? The PUD requirements say you have to show a
correlation between the development and the impact on that particular area. Is
there an innovative way to do it? It was decided that a legal opinion would be
needed to answer these questions.
Summit County generates $5 million in revenue 3 months a year from their
extensive bike path system. A survey they did says that people come up there
specifically to ride the paths. Summit County had to put traffic officers on the
paths to control traffic and accidents.
It was brought up that there was a concern with connecting the paths to the
transportation tax. The suggestion was made to use the fund balance and call it
a trails balance.
The Town of Vail has done a great job on trails and may have some resistance for
putting up money for something they already have. A. portion of the sales tax
could be retumed for maintenance of existing trails for situations like theirs.
The timeframe from CDOT to get shoulders widened is a 20 year plan. Perhaps ~
they could be encouraged to move the plan up.
Eagle County Transportation Summit Minutes, May 10, 1995 -
• Page 4 F. Group Consensus
A prepared agenda regarding the transportation tax will be put together so that
what is presented to the governments.in the County will all be the same.
These presentations will be done by professional staff and will not be the
responsibility of the Transportation Committee members.
The presentations should be done by Harry Taylor and Larry Brooks and by Ellie
. Caryl and Paul Gotthelf on the trails subject, if their supervisors will agree to
allow them time to do this.
Larry Grafel and Ellie Caryl will coordinate the information to be presented and
prepare an agenda.
June Deane will schedule the meetings with the various government entities for
the presenters when they have everything ready. ~
The question of whether we put this to the voters or go to the general funds will
have to be answered before the end of June.
The next regular Transportation Committee Meeting will be Thursday, June l,
6:00 p.m. at the Eagle County Building.
After all of the presentations have been made to the various government entities
it will be decided if another Tcansportation Summit is needed.
V. Preliminary Plan Outline for Operations
No discussion VI. Proposed Tax Ballot Issue
- No discussion
VII. Interconnect Issues (County Interconnects and Rail Issues)
No discussion
VIII. Next Steps
No discussion
IX. Adjournment - 12:00 noon
1~AR''g77[CIPANT LILS'II'
` ~AME REPRESENTIIVG ADDRES S
Bruce Campbell Trans. Comm. Avon, CO
Larry Grafel Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd., Vail 81657
Barb Bomier Red Cliff Box 114, Red Cliff 81649
Tom Hines . Avon Box 1998, Avon 81620
Larry Brooks Avon Box 975, Avon 81620
Richard Carnes Avon Box 1486, Avon 81620
Mike Rose Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd., Vail 81657
Paul Gotthelf EVCC 122 E. NTeadow Dr., Vail 81657
Art Bowles Trans. Comm. Box 98, Basalt
Harry N. Taylor Avon Box 1726, Avon 81620
George Roussos Eagle County Box 850, Eagle 81631
June Deane Eagle County Box 850, Eagle 81631
James Johnson Eagle County Box 850, Eagle 81631
Stan VVmC 181W. IVleadow Dr., Vail 81657
~
1VTichael Gallagher Minturn Box 309, Minturn 81645
Bob Warner • Trans. Comm. 1825 Sunburst Dr., Vail 81657
R.M. Dangler Minturn Box 309, Minturn 81645
Ellie Caryl Eagle County Box 179, Eagle 81631
Beth Vail Associates Box 915, Avon 81620
Bob McIlveen B.C. Resort Box 915, Avon 81620 Jeff Shroll Gypsum Box 130, Gypsum 81637
Peggy Osterfoss Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd., Vail 81657
Jill Kovacevich Trans. Comm. 953 S. Frontage Rd., Vai181657
REGIONAL TIZANSPORTATION
10 YEAR FINANCIAL SUlVIMARY
May 10, 1995
,
.
~EG~~~AL TRANSPORTAT~~~ ~~~TEM
OPERATING A5~~~PTIONS
Canru~ent Reguounal 'II'raunsportatuon Servuces Inclande:
* AHI Roantes caurreuntly operated 'ancOaad'ung Gypsuara to Vaal
* 1,500 servuce hoauu~ growBh per year
* 5% unffRatuonary rate per year 6n Operatiaag Costs
* Ve9uucDe repVacemenQ schec9ande
Reveunaue Assanmpauouns:
* IFOat u~ate stranctaare for Sung9e Itide Revenues. (ueo fare
6nca-eases pro,pecged)
* annanal uncrease an Discount & Monthly 1Pass 3ales .
* Sa?es 'd'ax revenane oncreases 5% annually
. New Assumptuounso
* Rudlershup andf safles tax revenues aa-e onsy soua-ces of fuands
* }Expandedl modeV to ghe year 2004 to show fu89 10 year projectuoua
* U1Pgracdea9 servuce hour gs-owth to aecommodate:
a) pau'aQa-ansut demands
b) gro`vQBn an lEagle-Vail, Leadva8le, GYpsum, Haghway 6
* Addfed ]EI ,UebeV/Basa9t Contributioun
* Addea9 p9annung all0owance
* Adldled operaaung capiQal ,
* ]Refgected saVes tax at .50%
* Geneu-atedl two models:
a) cash paarchase model
-lb) lease purchase mode9
, .
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
FACILITY IMPACT ASSUMPTIONS
Fixed Cost Assumptions:
* Land Cost
Facility Land (3 acres) $1,610,000
Park-N-Ride (4 sites, 1/2 Acre each) $1,000,000
Dowwd Junction, Eagle Vail,
Edwards, Eagle-Gypsum
* Improvements to . Park-N-Ride (4) sites $ 300,000
(asphalt, lighting, etc. @ $75,000 each)
* Facelity (51,000 sq. ft. for Operating $5,100,000
and Maintenance functions)
* Bus Shelters (9 shelters at $10,000 each) $ 90,000
* Debt Service begins 6/1/96
* Facility begins operating 1/1/98
* Maintenance Cost of $4.00 sq. ft. with 5% inflationary
annual increase
* Sales Tax revenue' increases 5% annua9ly .
* Credits for current Fixed Costs begin 1/1/98
.
~
REGIONAIL TRANSPORTA7I'ION S1UMMARY
CURRENT SERVIC]ES 1PROVgDE~ BY:
TOWN OIE' AVON
TOWN OlF Vf1I1L,
~ERVIClE ]f~OUlftS:
TOWN OF AVON - 24,955 Hours
TOWN OIF VE1dIL ~ 1,900 Hours
NUMBIER OF BUSIES OIP1EIEtA'II'ED IBY:
TOWN O]E' AV ON - 16
'd'~WN OIE' VAgE., - 2
lEXIS'd'dNG I[~OU'II'ES:
LIEADVd]L]LlE 'Il'O f1VON •
1EDWA]ltDS 'g'O VAgL
BIEf1V1ElE8 CRIEIEK .'II'O Vf1g1L
GYPSUM 'II'O VAI1L
IE~OU&8S O]F OPlE][tATdON:
. WdN'II'lER - 5:00 AM TO 2:30 AM DAdlLY
SUMMlER - 5:30 AM 'II'O 8:15 PM IIDAILY
Existing Transportation System
Counly Transportation System-Revised May 4, 1995 ~ Lease Purthase Model '
Projection of Annual Costs, Revenues, and Required Subsidies
For the Years Ending December 31, 1992 through 2004 No Fare Increases May 8,1995
Actual Actual Actual '
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1990 . 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
SystemMiles 490,000 537,694 563,117 650,377 785,308 920,239 1055,170 1,190,101 1,325,032 1,459,963 1,594,894 1,729,825 1,864,756
Syslem MPH 24 70 24 70 23.98 24.40 24 40 24.40 24 40 24 40 24.40 24.40 24 40 24.40 24.40
System Hours 19,839 21,769 23,479 26,655 32,185 37,715 43,245 48,775 54,305 59,835 65,365 70,895 76,425
Syslem Hour Growih 1,930 1,710 3,176 7,200 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530
Inflation 8 County Sales 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1 05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Operaling Expense:
Fixed $221,801 $258,527 $262,286 $276,469 $290,292 $304,807 $320,047 $336,050 $352,852 $370,495 $389020 $408,471 $428,894
Variable Rate Per Hour $21.10 $24.06 $23.50 $2520 $26.46 $2718 $29 17 $30.63 $32.16 $33.77 $35.46 $37.23 $39.09
Variable $418,690 $523,678 $551,705 $671,706 $851,615 $1.047,836 $1,261,550 $1,494,015 $1,746,573 $2,020,652 $2,317,773 $2,639.554 $2,987,719
Management $35,000 $50,000 $50 000 $50,000 $52,500 $55,125 $57,881 $60,775 $63,814 $67,005 $70,355 E73,873 $77,566
EI JebeVBasaN Coniribution $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,200 $158,760 $166,698 $175,033 $183,785 $192,974 $202,622 $212,754 $223,391
Planning Allowance $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Operating Capital $80 000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 E50,000 $50,000
Capital Existing $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,242 $276,274 $457,297 $457,297 $457,297 $457,297 $457,297 $457,297 $748,049
Capital Expanded Routes $0 $0 $0 $0 E183,725 $257,162 $355,162 $206,836 $245,987 $393,616 $398,616 $404,616 $286,616
Total Ezpense - $755,491 E832205 $863,991 $998,175 $1,662,574 $2,199,964 $2,718,636 $2,830,006 $3,150,308 $3,602,039 $3,935,683 $4,296,564 $4,852,236
Revenues
Single Ride-Eagle County
Passengers 146,250 193,095 184.430 185,000 185,000 185.000 185,000 185,000 . 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000
Rate Per Passenger $2.00 $2 00 $2 00 $2 00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00
Revenues $292,500 $386,190 $368.859 $370.000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000
Single Ride-Leadville
Passengers 13,000 17,798 16,915 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000
Rate Per Passenger $3.00 $3 00 $3.00 $3 00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00
Revenues $39000 $53,395 $50,744 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $61,000 $51,000 $51,000
20 Ride Eagle Counly Pass
Passes Sold 390 417 5B9 600 630 662 695 729 766 804 B44 886 931
Rate Per Pass $30.00 $30 00 $30.00 $30.00 $30 00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00
Revenues $11.700 $12,513 $17,655 $18,000 $18,900 $19,845 $20,837 $21,879 $22,973 $24,122 $25,328 $26.594 $27,924
Monlhly Pass:
Passes Sold 1,560 2,283 2,752 2,900 3,045 3,197 3,357 3,525 3,701 3,886 4,0B1 4,285 4,499
Rate Per Pass $30.00, $30 00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 . $30 00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00
Revenues $46,800 $68.489 $82,567 $87,000 $91,350 $95,918 $100,713 $105,749 $111,036 $116.588 $122,418 E12B,539 $134,966
Gypsum System:
Passengers 0 0 0 14,031 14,733 15,469 16,243 17,055 17,908 18,803 19,743 20,730 21,767
EHectNe Rate/Passenger $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07
Revenues $0 $0 $O $15,013 $15,764 $16,552 $17,380 $18249 $19,161 $20,119 $21,125 $22.181 $23,290
Ezpanded Routes ,
Passengers 0 0 0 0 48,000 50,400 52,920 55,566 58,344 61,262 64,325 67,541 70,918
EHective Rate/Passenger $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 E1.07 $1.07 $1.07
Revenues $O $0 $0 $0 $51,360 $53,928 $56,624 $59,456 $62,428 $65,550 $68,827 $72,269 $75,882
Total Revenues All Sources $390,000 $520,587 $519,825 $541 013 $598,374 $607243 $616,555 $626,332 $636,599 $647,379 $658,698 $670,583 $683,062
Annual Subsidy $365,491 $311,618 $344,166 $457,162 $1,064,200 $1,592,721 $2,102,081 $2,203,674 $2,513,709 $2,954,660 $3,276,985 $3,625,981 $4,169,174
1 % Eagle Courny Sales Tax $4,825,645 $5,369,263 $6,026,395 $6,400,000 $6,720,000 $7,056,000 $7,408,800 $7,779,240 $8,168,202 $8,576,612 $9,005,443 $9,455,715 $9,928,501
Add Impacts of New 8us Maintenance Facility-Assume 1996J1997 Construction and 1998 Year One Operetions
Actual Actual Actual
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fixed Cost Reduclions: 30 / of Annual Operating Lease Expense in Amount of $122,960 (1993 Dollars) 47,079 49,433 51,905 54,500 57,225 60,087 63,091
30 % of Annual Existing Transit Facility
Utility and Maintenance Costs in Amount ol $32,210 (1993 Dollars) 12,333 12,949 13,597 14,277 14,990 15,740 16,527
Total Fixed Cost Reductions 59,412 62,383 65,502 68,777 72216 75,827 79,618
Fixed Cost Additions:
Annual Debt Service on $8.1 Miliion Bond Issue-June 1, 1996 .
Preliminary Number lor Land, Intra., Construction, Design, Shellers, Park 8 Ride,
Other-7.511d20 Year Serial Bonds 397,274 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547
100 % ol Projected Annual New Transil Facility
Utility and Maintenance Costs (Assume $4.00/Square Fooi X 51,000 Sq. Ft.) 260,361 273,380 287,048 301,401 316,471 332,295 348,909
Total Fixed Cost Additions 397,274 794,547 1,054,908 1,067,927 1,081,595 1,095,948 1,111,018 1,126,842 1,143,456
Total Net Fixed Cost Add $0 $0 $0 $0 $397,274 $794,547 $995,496 $1,005,544 $1,016,094 $1,027,171 $1,038,802 $1,051,015 $1,063,838
TotalSubs;dy- ExistingBNewTransilFacility $365,491 $311,618 $344,166 $457,162 $1,461,473 $2,387268 $3,097,5T7 $3,209,217 $3,529,803 $3,981,831 $4,315,787 $4,676,996 $5,233,012
Total Projected 1 %
Eagle Counly Sales Tax at
5 % Annual Growth $4,825,645 $5,368,263 $6,026,395 $6,400,000 $6,720,000 $7,056,000 $7,408,800 $7,779,240 $8,168,202 $8,576,612 $9,005,443 $9,455,715 $9,928,501
°o of County Sales Tax
Required to Fund Delicit
Existing and New Facilities 008% 0.06 % 0.06 % 0.07 % 022 % 0 34 % 0 42 % 0.41 % 0.43% 0 46 % 0.48 % 0.49 % 0.53 %
% ol County Sales Tax
Required to Fund Deficil
Exisling Service Only 0.08 % 006% 0,06 % 0.07 % 016 % 023 % 028 % 028 % 0.31 % 0.34 % 0.36 % 0.38 % 0.429/6
Annual Cash Flow
Assuming .50 % Sales Tax:
50% Sales Tax Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,360,000 $3,528,000 $3.704,400 $3,989,620 $4,084,101 " $4,288,306 $4,502,721 $4,727,857 $4,984,250
Less: Above Subsidy $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,461,473 $2,387,268 $3,097,577 $3,209,217 $3,529,803 $3,981,830 $4,315,787 $4,676,996 $5,233,012
Excess Annual Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,898,527
$1,140,732 $606,823 $680,403 $554,298 $306,476 $186,934 $50,861 ($268,762)
Operating Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,898,527 $3,039,258 $3,646,081 $4,326,484 $4,880,782 $5,187,257 $5,374,191 $5,425,052 $5,156,290
Existing Transportation System
County Transportation System
Projected Schedule ol New Bus Acquisitions and related annual lease purchase paymenis at 8.50/d10 year amortization
For ihe years ending Oecember 31, 1992 Ihrough 2001
May 4, 1995
Assumes No Federal Funding ,
Projected Annual Lease Payments
Existino Svstem Onlv ~1 1993 1994 ]m im Lm 1998 iqqo 2000 2001 ZQQZ 2m =4
1993 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
1994 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
1995 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $0 $p _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
1996 Acquire 1 Bus $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $33,242 $33,242 $33,242 $33,242 $33,242 $33,242 $33,242 $33,242 $33,242
1997 Acquire 7.Buses $1,645,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $243,032 $243032 $243,032 $243,032 $243,032 $243,032 $243,032 $243,032
1998 AcqutreSBuses $1,225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 • $0 $181,023 $181,023 $191,023 $181,023 $181,023 $187,023 $181,023
1999 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2000 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . $0 $0
2001 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 . $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p gp
2002 Acquire No Buses EO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p gp
2003 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2004 Acquue 6 Buses $1,968,000 $O LO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $290,752
TOTALS $5 063 000 s0 $0 $0 y33242 $276,274 $457297 $457,297 $457,297 $457,297 $457,297 $457,297 $746.049
Projected Annual Lease Payments
Exnanded Routes' too~ ]m 1995 jM 1997 1998 ]~,Q$ 2000 ZQQ], 2QQZ 2m ZQ44
1996 Acquire 3 Buses $675,000 $0 $0 $0 $99,725 $99,725 $99,725 $99,725 $99,725 $99,725 $99,725 $99,725 $99,725
1997 Acquire 2 Buses _ $470,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $69,438 $69,438 $69,438 $69,438 $69,438 $69,438 $69,438 $69,438
1998 Acquire No 8uses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . $p yp
1999 Acquire 1 Bus $255,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,674 $37,674 $37,674 $37,674 $37,674 $37,674
2000 Acquire i Bus $265,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,151 $39,151 $39,151 $39,151 $39,151
2001 Acquire 1 Bus $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,629 $40,629 $40,629 $40,629
TOTALS $1,940,000 $0 $0 $0 $99,725 $169,163 $169,163 $206,837 $245,988 $286,617 $286,617 $286.617 $286,817
Projected Annual Cash Payments
~ Peoole Movers : C= 1993 1994 1995 ]m 1997 1998 1999 ZQQQ 249.1 2m
50AA2004
+ 1996 Acquire 1 P.M. $84,000 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p gp gp
S~ 1997 Acquire i P.M. $88,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $88,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
/ 1998 Acquire 2 P.M. $186,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $186,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
1999 Acquire No P.M. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2000 Acquire No P.M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 $0 $0
2001 Acquire 1 P.M. $107,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107,000 $0 $0 $0
2002 Acquire 1 P.M. $112,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,000 $0 $0
2003 Acquire 1 P.M.. $118,000 $0 $0 $0 ' $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $118,000 $0
TOTALS $695,000 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $88,000 $186,000 $0 ' $0 $107000 $112,000 $118.000 b0
EzistingTransportalionSystem County Transportation System-Revised AAay 4, 1995 CaSh PuiChaS9 Model
Projection ol dnnual Costs, Revenues, and Required Subsidies
For the Years Ending Deoember 31, 1992 througA 2000 No Fare Increases
May 4,1995
Actual Actual i Actual
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
SystemMiles 490,000 537,694 563,117 650,377 785,308 920,239 1,055,170 1,190,101 1,325,032 1,459,963 1,594,894 1,729,825 1,864,756
System MPH 24 70 24 70 2198 24 40 24 40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40 24,40 24.40
System Hours 19,839 21,769 23,479 26,655 32,195 37,715 43,245 48,775 54,305 59,835 65,365 70,895 76,425
System Hour Growth 1.930 1,710 3,176 7,200 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,530
Inllalion 8 County Sales 1 1.05 1 05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
I
Operating Expense: '
Fixed $221,801 $258,527 $262,286 $276,469 $290,292 $304,807 $320,047 $336,050 $352,852 $370,495 $389,020 $408,471 $428,894
Variable Rate Per Hour $21 10 $24.06 $23.50 $25.20 $26.46 $27.78 $29.17 $30.63 $32.16 $33.77 $35.46 y3723 $39.09
Variable $418,690 $523,678 $551,705 $671,706_ $851,615 $1,047,836 $1,261,550 $1,494,015 $1,746,573 $2,020,652 $2,317.773 $2,639,554 $2,987,719
Management $35,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $52,500 $55,125 $57,881 $60,775 $63,814 $67,005 $70,355 $73,873 $77,566
EI JebeVBasalt Contribution $0 $0 $O $O $151,200 $158,760 $166,698 $175.033 $183,765 $192,974
$202,622 $212,754 $223,391
Planning Albwance $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Operating Capital $80,000 $O $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Capital Existing EO $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $1,645,000 $1,225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 §0 $1,968,000
Capilal Expanded Routes $0 $0 EO $0 . $759,000 $558,000 $186,000 $255,000 $265,000 $382,000 $387,000 $393,000 $275,000
Total Expense $755 491 $832,205 $863,991 $998,175 $2,429,608 $3,869,528 $3,317,176 $2,420,873 $2,712.024 $3,133,126 $3,466,770 $3,827,651 $6,060,570
Revenues
Single Ride-Eagle County
Passengers 146.250 193,095 184,430 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 195,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000
Rate Per Passenger $2 00 E2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00
Revenues $292,500 $386,190 $368,859 $370,000 $370,000
Single Aide-Leadville $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370,000 $370.000 $370,000 $370,000 $370.000
Passengers 13,000 17,798 16,915 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000
Rate Per Passenger $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 E3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00
Revenues $39,000 $5$395 $50,744 $5~,000 $5 000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $61000
20 Ride Eagle Courny Pass $51,000 $61,000
Passes Sold 390 417 5B9 600 630 662 695 729 766 B04 844 886 931
Rate Per Pass $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30:00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 0.00 $30.00
Revenues $11,700 $12,513 $17,655 $18,000 $18,900 $19,845 $20,837 $21,879 $22973 E24o22 $25,328 $30~ ~ 924
Monthly Pass: ~26,594
PassesSold 1,560 2,283 ' 2,752 2,900 3,045 3,197 3,357 3,525 3,701 3,886 4,081 4,285 4,499
Rate Per Pass $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00
Revenues $46,800 $68,489 $82,567 $87,000 $91,350 $95,918 $100,713 $105,749 $111,036 $116,5BB $122,418 $128,539 $134,966
Gypsum Syslem:
Passengers 0 0 0 14,031 14,733 15,469 16,243 17,055 17,908 18,803 19,743 20,730 21,767
EHective Rate/Passenper $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1,07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07
Revenues $0 $0 $0 $15,013
Expanded Routes $15,764 $16,552 $17,380 $18,249 $19,161 $20,119 $21,125 $22,181 $23,290
Passengers 0 0 0 0 48,000 50,400 52,920 55,568 58,344 61,262 64,325 67,541 70,918
EHective Rate/Passenger E0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07 $1.07
Revenues gp $p $0
, $0 $51,360 $53,928 $56,624 E59,456 $62,428 $65,550 $68,827 $72,269 $75,882
Total Fevenues All Sources $390,000 $520,5B7 $519,825 $541,013 $598,374 $607,243 $618,555 $626,332 $636,599 $647,379 E658,698 $670,583 $683,062
AnnualSubsidy $365,491 $311,618 $344,166 $457,162 $1,831,234 $3,262,285 $2,700,622 $1,794,541 $2,075,425 $2,485,747 $2,808,072 $3,157,068 $5,377,508
1 % Eagle Courdy Sales Tax $4,825,645 $5.368,263 $6,026,395 $6,400,000 $6,720,000 $7,056,000 $7,408,800 $7,779,240 $8,168,202 $8,576,612 $9,005,443 $9,455,715 $9,928,501
Add Impacts of New Bus Maintenance Facility-Assume 199611997 Construction and 1998 Year One Operations Cash Purchase Model .
Actual Actual Actual
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fized Cost Reductions:
• 30% of Annual Operating Lease Expense in Amount of $122.960 (1993 Dollars) 47,079 49,433 51,905 54,500 57,225 60,087 63,091
30 % of Annual Exisling Transit Facilily
Utility and Maintenance Costs in Amount ol $32,210 (1993 Dollars) 12,333 12,949 13,597 14,277 14,990 15,740 16,527
Total Fixed Cosl Reductions 59,412 62,383 65,502 68,777 72,216 75,827 79,619
Fixed Cost Additions:
Annual Debt Service on $8 1 Million 8ond Issue-June 1, 1996
Preliminary Number ior Land, Inire., Construction, Design, Sheflers, Park R Ride,
Other-7.51W20 Year Serial Bonds 397,274 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547 794,547
100 % ol Projected Annual New Transit Faciiity
Utility and Maintenance Costs (Assuma $4 00/Square Foot X 51,000 Sq. Ft.) 260,361 273,380 287,048 301,401 316,471 332295 348,909
Total Fixed Cost Additions 397,274 794,547 1,054,906 1,067,927 1,081,595 1,095,948 1,111,018 1,126,842 1,143,456
Tolal Net Fixed Cost Add $0 $0 $0 $O $397,274 $794,547 $995,496 $1,005,544 $1,016,094 $1,027,171 ) $1,038,802 $1,051,015 $1,063,838
Total Subsidy-Existing 8 New Transit Facility $365,491 $311,618 $344,166 $457,162 $2228,507 $4,056,832 $3,696,118 $2,800,085 $3,091,519 $3,512,918 $3,846,874 $4,208,083 $6,441,347
Total Projected 1 %
Eagle County Sales Tax at
5% Annual Growth $4,825,645 $5,368,263 $6,026,395 $6,400,000 $6,720,000 E7.056,000 $7.408.800 $7,779,240 $8,168202 $8,576,612 $9,005,443 $9,455,715 $9,928,501
% of Cour»y Sales Tax
Required to Fund Deficit
Exisling and New Facilities 0.08 % 0.06 % 0.06 % 0.07 % 0.33 % 0.57 % 0.50% 0,36% 0.38% 0.41 % 0.43 % 0.45% 0.65%
' % ot County Sales Tax
Aequired to Fund Delicit
Existing Service Only 0.08 % 0.06 % 0.06 % 0.07 % 027 % 0.46 % 0.36 % 023 % 025 % 0.29% 0.31 % 0.33'Y, 0.54 %
Annual Cash Fbw
Assuming 50 % Sales Tax:
50% Sales Tax Revenue $0 y0 $0 $0 $3,360,000 $3,528,000 $3,704,400 $3,889,620 $4,084,101 $4,288,306 $4,502,721 $4.727.857 $4,984,250
Less: Above Subsidy $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,228,507 $4,056,832 $3,696,118 $2,800,085 $3,091,519 $3,512,918 $3,846,874 $4,208,083 $6,441,347
Excess Annual Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,131,493 . ($528,832) $8,282 $1,089,535 $992,582 E775,388 $655,847 $519,774 ($1;477,097)
Operating Reserve $0 $0 $0 EO $1,131,493 $602,660 $610,942 E1,700,478 $2,693,060 $3,468,448 $4,124,295 $4,644,070 a3,168,973
' ~ ~
Existing Transportation System
County Transportation System CaSh PurChaSe Model
Projected Schedule ol New Bus Acquisitions
For ihe years ending December 31, 1992 through 2004
May 4, 1995
AssUmes No Federal Funding .
Projected Annual Cash Payments
xictina System Only C= 192q im c,~,~g¢ ]m 1998 1494 ZQQQ m 2= - y= ygQq
1993 Acquire No Buses $p gp $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0
1994 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $p gp $p $0
1995 Acquire No Buses $p gp $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0
1996 Acquire 1 8us $225,000 $0 $0 yp $225 p00 yp $0 $0 $0 . $0 $0 $O $0
1997 Acquire 7 Buses $1,645,000 $0 $p $p $0 $1,645,000 $0 $0 EO ' $0 $0 $0 $p
1998 Acquire 5 Buses $1,225,000 $0 $p gp $p §p $1,225,000 yp gp $p $p $0 $p
1999 Acquire No Buses EO $0 $0 gp gp $p $0 $0 $0 $p gp $p $0
2000 Acquire No Buses bp gp $p Ep $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $O $0 $O $0
2001 Acquire No Buses gp yp yp yp $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $O - $0
2002 Acquire No Buses $O $0 $0 $p $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $p $0
2003 Acquire No Buses SO $0 $0 EO Ep $p $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $O $0
2004 Acquire 6 Buses $1,968,000 $O $0 EO $p $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,968,000
TOTALS $5,063,000 $0 $p $0 g225,000 $1,645,000 $1.225,000 $0 $p $p $O $p $1,968,000
Projected Annual Cash Paymenfs
xoarxi d Ro ts S,.Q~( +qo~ 1994 ]_gM ].yR 1998 1999 ZQ~ ~1 Z=
1996 Acquire 3 Buses $675.000 $0 $p $p $675,000 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0
1997 Acquire 2 Buses $470,000 $0 $0 $0 §0 $470,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p
1998 Acquire No Buses $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $p $p $p $o $0 $0 $0
1999 Acquire 1 Bus $255,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2000 Acquire 1 Bus $265,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,000 $0 $p $p $0
2001 Acquire 1 Bus $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EO $0 $275,000 $275,000 $275,000 $275,000
TOTALS $1,940,000 $0 $0 $0 $675,000 $470,000 $0 $255,000 $265,000 $275,000 $275,000 $275,000 $275,000
Projecfed Annual Cash Payments
Peoole Movers lc c~ 1997 1998 M2 Z= 2001 2=
1996 Acquire 1 P.M. $84,000 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $p $0 gp $p $0 $0 $p $10
1997 Acquire 1 P.M. $88,000 $0 $0 $0 $p $88.000 ap $p $p $0 $0 $0 ap
1998 Acquire 2 P.M. $186,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $186,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p
1999 Acquire No P.M. $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p ap
2000 Acquire No P.M. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2001 Acquire 1 P.M $107,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107,000 $0 $p $p
2002 Acquire 1 P.M. $112,000 $0 $0 $0 $p $p $p $p $p $0 $112,000 . $0 $0
2003 Acquire 1 P.M. $118,000 $0 $0 $0 $p $p $p yp $0 $0 $0 $118,000 $0 .
TOTALS $695,000 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $88,000 $186,000 $0 $0 $107,000 $112,000 $118.000 $0
The Eagle River Valley Traii System
~
The proposed system is comprised of two types of trails and the main goal for this system is to
move towards accoinplishment of both of these types:
1. A widened shoulder on the entire length of Highway 6 through Eagle
County to accommodate the higher speed trainer, commuter bicyclists and reduce
. conflicts with motor vehicles, and to link sections of the separated path system in
areas where there are gaps between sections of separated trail due to construction or
acquisition difficulties.
2. A non-motorized mtilti-use traii, separated from roadways traveled by motor
vehicles, that would accommodate more of the recreational type user. The trail
alignments indicated on the trail. maps vary in their orientation to the Eagle River,
Highway 6 and Interstate 70 but generally move from east to west, maintaining the goal
of Iinking communities within the Eagle River Valley together. In general, it is desirable
to have the trail adjacent or near to the Eagle River, which is viewed by citizens as an
attractive and usable amenity, when it can be achieved without impacting the riparian
corridor or wetlands.
Priorities for Trail Development.
The following ranking was developed through the Trails Committee meeting process as the order
in which the individual segments of the Eagle River Valley Trail System should pursued. The
system is comprised of two types of trail - the Highway 6 shoulder system and a non-motorized
trail separated from the roadway - as previously noted. They are identified here by those same
categories, by segment (which generally span the distances between communities) in order of
priority:
Highway 6 Shoulder Widening Separated Trail
l.Avon to Edwards 1. Avon to Dowd Junction
2.Eagle to Gypsum 2. Dowd Jlinction to Minturn
3.Edwards to Wolcott 3. Avon to Edwards
4. Wolcott to Eagle 4. Eagle to Gypsum
S.Minturn to Red Cliff(6&24) 5. Edwards to Wolcott
6.Gypsum to Dotsero 6. Wolcott to Eagle
7.Dotsero to Glenwood Canyon 7. Minturn to Red Cliff
8. Gypsum to Dotsero 9. Dotsero to Glenwood Canyon
The following section describes the proposed Highway 6 and separated trail improvements to
Highway 6 by segment, from an west to east perspective. The preliminary estimates are that
comprehensive widening of Highway 6, as described in the following section, will cost
approximately $9,800,000. The complete separated trails system will cost between $7 and
$9 million dollats.
NOTE: Estimates as described do not include potential cost for property acquisition ,
which is not detinitively known at tllis ti?ne, and do not include contingency, which is estimated
at 20%. Surveying and construction design will be provided by Eagle County. Estimated trail
costs include general gradinb, shaping, base materiai and paving. It is not known at this time
how much of the tollowin; described improvements will be constriicted by public entities or
private development interests.