Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-06-27 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESS@O~ TUESDAY, JflJiVE 27, 1995 - 12:00 P.M. 8N TO!/ COUNCIL C6iAB1ABEFtS 1. Executive Session - iVegotiations (in Community Development Large Conference Room). 2. St. Moritz Presentation. 3. Community Survey Results Presentation. 4. Vail Commons Discussion. 5. Seibert Circle Design Discussion. 6. 1995 1 st Quarter Financial Report. 7. Regional Transportation Discussion. 8. Alpenrose Tea Deck Expansion. 9. RFP/Ford Amphitheater. 10. PEC Report. 11:. DRB Report. 12. Information Update. 13. Council.Reports. 14. Other. - 15. Adjournment. R10YE UPCOflflIIdG RflEETING Sl'A12T 7'IfVIES BELOVlI: (ALL TIMES AFtE APPROXIIIflATE AND SUBJEC7 TO CHANGE) 0 m o 0 0 0 0 THE NIEJCT VAIL 70WN COUNCIL REGULAf21iVORK SESSIOYV WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7/11195, BEGINfVING A7 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING !lAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULA121NORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDA,Y, 7/18/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN 1'OV COUNCIL CHAPIABERS. THE NEXT VA1L TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENIPlG WIEETIRlG lMIL.L BE ON TUESDA'Y, 7/18/95, BEGIiVNIfVG AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHi4MBERS. ~ ~ ~ e • ~ ~ C:WGENDA.WSE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JIIIVE 27, 9995 - 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGEIVDA 12:00 P.M. 1. Executive Session - Negotiations. 01:00 P.M. 2. St. Moritz Presentation. Susanne Robbi 01:05 P.M. 3. Community Survey Results Presentation. Suzanne Silverthorn Nolan Rosall 02:05 P.M. 4. Vail Commons Discussion. A discussion of the Vail Commons Andy Knudtsen project, specifically a review of traffic impacts, market analysis, the Chris Cares matrix comparing the final three developers, and the criteria to be Dan Guimond used in evaluating each proposal. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to presentations, review material, and direct staff to enter into negotiations with a developer or direct staff to provide additional information to clarify each of the proposals. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Please see memo in packet. 04:05 P.M. 5. Seibert Circle Redesign Presentation of DRB Selected Alternative Todd Oppenheimer Design Paul Kuhn, Winston Assoc. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUiVCIL: Approval of DRB selected alternative. BACKGROUND RATIOiVALE: Seibert Circle is included in Streetscape fVlaster Plan. Project tied to redevelopment of Golden Peak House. STAFF RECOMIVIEfVDATIOiV: Approve DRB preferred alternate. 04:35 P.M. 6. 1995 1st Quarter Financial Report. Steve Thompson 05:20 P.M. 7. Discuss Summit County regional transit authority policy, finance, Larry Grafel and operations to give the Town Council an understanding of the Mike Rose political as well as the operational nuances associated with a non Amy Ostrander -political authority. Will also be discussing staff recommendations and develop transportation "criteria" to present to the next Eagle County Interim Regional Transportation Authority meeting. ACTIOfV REQUESTED OF COUiVCIL: 1) Ask questions of Summit County representatives; 2) Discuss staff recommendations ana Louncil issues; and 3) Develop preliminary transit system criteria. BACKGROUiVD RATIONALE: Eagle County has been trying to implement a Regional Transit Authority that utilizes an independent transit authority, develop initial service routes, an operating budget, with a focus on putting the transit issue before the voters this November regarding a"Transit Tax", with the percentage to be determined. 1 ~ Council raised concerns regarding continued levels of funding for certain routes, specifically Beaver Creek to Vail service, and whether or not that is/would become part of the "regional" system, and whether that would be appropriate to be funded by a transit tax. Other issues surfaced regarding authority representation when tied to percentage tax revenue generation, and expansion of initial routes to Red Cliff, Minturn, etc. Council requested staff to provide some basic "Criteria" on the - operation of the authority and the system to present to the next Transit Authority Board meeting so that what ever issues that are surfaced can be dealt with early on in the development of the regional system. 06:50 P.M. 8. Request by Alpenrose Tea Room to extend a portion of deck on Tom Moorhead Town of Vail Property. Bob McLaurin ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: To consider request by applicant to extend onto TOV property. Council's consideration will only relate to use of property and not the merits of their request ~ from a PEC/DRB point of view. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Before proceeding through permit process with application which includes improvements on TOV property, Council should decide issues as to use of Town property, Community Development will not be making a presentation to Council at this time on the application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Grant authority to proceed through process. If application is approved the use of Town property will require either a deck lease or a revocable right-of-way permit. 07:05 P.M. 9. RFP/Ford Amphitheater. Bob McLaurin 07:10 P.M. 10. PEC Report. Mike Mollica 07:25 P.M. 11. DRB Report. Randy Stouder George Ruther 07:40 P.M. 12. Information Update. 07:50 P.M. 13. Council Reports. 08:00 P.M. 14. Other. 08:10 P.M. 15. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE ANO SUBJECT TO CHANGE) 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7/11/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWIIVG VAIL TOWN COUWCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7/18/95, BEGIYVNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7/18/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. o s • • . • • C:WGENDA.WSE 2 UVORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOIN-UP SOLUT@OfVS 1995 Current discussions presume a decisior? in 6 months (April '95). VA has 10119 SNOW STORAGE LAND LARRYIBOB NicL: Immediately pursue purchase from VA asked to dump snow at this location. Eecause of our environmental PURCHASE of current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres liability, this request was denied. Larry, Bob, and Tom are following up. adjacent to the west. Joe Macy was in to see Larry again thi:; week. Has taken the lease to VA attorneys to address environmental liability issue. 02115 CHUCK ANDERSON YOUTH PAUL/JAN: Contact VRD about moving up the selection Met with all principalslheadmasterland ,3upenntendent of Schools on AWARD process to allow awards to be given during May PRIOR to 3123/95, and will continue to follow up cn this auspicious beginning to (request: Strauch) graduation or to be included with the graduation create a nevu scholarship program to replace this previous award. ceremonies. 02/07 "NEED LIST" FOR '99 ALL: Finalize list with departments and Council for John Dakin of the Vail Valley Foundation has prepared a report which is CHAMPIONSHIPS presentation to State. currently being reviewed by the Town and Foundation staffs. It will be ready to discuss with Taylor and Watteriberg when they meet with Council. 02121 CHILDCARE/JOHANNES. BOB: Johannes has expressed an interest in Steve will follow up wIABC. School (Holly Bukacek) since ABC is currently FAESSLER providing/maintaining/subsidizing childcare for the "general considering an expansion of their currerit facilities. Paul will contact public" at the Mountain Bell site. Follow up on this inquiry. Johannes to determine how serious his original offer was. 04104 TOURISM DISTRICT BOBITONi: Follow-up with appropriate process and Fouc membecs of the Firoance Comma-t4ee from $he VVTCB wal9 be (request: Strauch) legislation to promote and create a Tourism District. traveliaag 40 DenveP to discuss with Dee Wusor. 05/23 EHU TONI: Council directed Town Attomey to prepare an Tom will be corresponding with both Hoiy Cross Electric and Public ordinance which would require all employee housing units Service Company. in the Town to adhere to all ordinances, rules and regulations in effect as may be amended from time to time. 05123 EHU/COMMERCIAL TOMJSUSAN: Council would like to explore a formula which would require employee housing units within commercial development projects based on the percentage of full time equivalent employees associated with the project. ' June 23, 1995 Page 1 of 2 05/23 EHUIEXEMPTIONS TOMIBOB: Council agreed to pursue an idea by Merv Lapin in which residents of employee housing units, such as the future Vail Commons project, could be exempt from franchise fees collected by- utilities to reduce the cost of housing BOB: Council reiterated its interest in consolidating We have completetl an inventory of existing box locations and numbers 05123 NEWSPAPER BOXES newspaper boxes on public property in the commercial core and have compared them with the study that was completed 2 years ago. areas and asked. Town Manager to share an action plan at We are currently preparing a map desic;nating specific approved locations its next meeting. which we will be presenting to the newspapers. This map will be completed next week. We will finalize the box design and location issues ' (e.g., size, number, rotation of users) by late June. We intend to order the boxes and have them fabricated by late summer. Copies of the map witl be provided when completed. 06l06 BUILDING PERMIT FEES SUSAN: Merv Lapin wondered how we monitor accuracy of building violations by applicant. (What is originally declared and assessed vs. as built). ~ June 23, 1995 Page 1 of 2 fPUBLIC NOTICE . VA0Q. TO9A/N CO~.1.91VCIL IrIEETITIG SCFIEDIlLE (as of 6/23/95) yULYo 1995 In an attempt to respond to scheduled meeting demands, as well as adhere to mandated ordinance and charter requiremenu, Council meetings are scheduled at the following times: E@/EAI@AdG MEET9NGS Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each month, starting at 7:30 P.M. These meetings wrill provide a forum for citizen participation and public audience for conducting regular Council business. WORK SF,SS@ONS Work sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues before the Council, will now be scheduled to begin at 2:00 P.M. (unless otherwise noted) on everv Tuesday afternoon. TF~~ JULY0 1995 9/AI9. 7"OV1IN COl11VClfl. MEETITIG SCF9EDlJLE 9S AS FOLLOWS: Tuesdav, )ulv 4, 1995 No work session............ (No Meeting - Holiday) Evening meeting....o....... (No Meeting - Holiday) Tuesdav. ]ulv 11, 1995 WOC{C SeSSIOtI....va.a,... 02:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Tuesdav,,ulv 18 1995 bNork session............ 2:00 P.M. (s[arting [ime determined by length of agenda) Evening meeting......... 07:30 P.M. . 1"uesdav, ulv 25, 1995 Work session...o....:... 02:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) T01MN OF !/AIL Pamela A. Brandmeyer Assistant Town Manager ~ MEnAORANDIJM TO: Town Council and Vail Commons Task Force FROM: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Susan Connelly, Director of Cornmunity Development _ Andy Knudtsen, Vail Commons Project Manager DATE: June 27, 1995 SUBJECT: Update on the Vail Commons Project 0. INTRODfl9CT9ON The purpose of today's meeting is to review two recently completed reports that address questions raised by the Town Council and Task Force at the May 17th meeting regarding anticipated traffic impacts and market analysis and to answer any other questions raised by Council. Representatives of Safeway and City Market will be present and have requested the opportunity to briefly discuss, in general terms, how each proposal benefits the community. The purpose of th6s aneeting is to bring closure to the two outstanding. questioras and ensure that there 6s adequate 6nformatAOn in order to select a developer. Council may request add64ional ana9ysis of other ussues, or rnay believe the available Bnformation is adequate and may ti6rect staff to enter aaato negotiations with a siragle deve9opere H. BACKGROUND On May 17, 1995, ihe Council and Task Force heard presentations from the three short-listed developers. At that time, a greater understanding of each proposal was gained and many questions were raised. From those discussions, two issues surfaced. The first involved market area and whether or not the Vail market wras large enough to support two grocery stores. The other involved traffic impacts. VVould the traffic impacts from the proposed developments exceed the capacity of the streets surrounding the property? Staff has had consultants look into these tvvo questions and a summary is provided belovu. The full reports, are attached to this memo as Exhibits A & B. Concerning other issues, staff has provided an "apples to apples" comparison of 17 different aspects of each proposal. These are listed in a matrix, which is attached to this memo as Exhibit C. An earlier version of the matrix was presented to Towrn Council and the Task Force on May 23, 1995. That matrix has been refined and greater detail provided. Qdd. O5SUE5 FOR DISCUSS00N Market Analysis The Touvn's retail consultant, Dan Guimond, has concluded: "It is ciear that there are sufficient sales potentials to support an expanded Safeway. In our opinion, there are also sufficient sales outflows, and opportunities to gain sales from competition, to attract a competitive chain such as City Market to open a new store and compete with the existing Safeway store." F:\everyonelandylmemos\council.627 1 „ Please see the report for a greater understanding of the market potential and the corresponding amount of grocery store floor area that can be supported. While two stores can be supported in the market area, Safeway's market share is likely to decline if a second store is opened. Traffic Analysis _ Concerning the traffic impacts, our consultant has concluded that the Loftus proposal would generate 9,300 vehicles per day, Gart's development proposal would generate approximately 8,400 vehicles per day and the City Market proposal would generate approximately 6,750 vehicle trips per day. It is important to note that at peak hour, demand from the Loftus and Gart proposals would result in a 30% increase over existing traffic volumes on the North Frontage Road. City Market traffic generation results in a 20% increase at peak hour. , IV. EVALUATION OF CRRERIA. Eight selection criteria were identified to each developer during the RFP process so that each developer would fuNy understand the Town's interests. These are provided below in bold text. A. Review and discussion af the proposed development plan, including proDect scale l and land use relatioroships. Quality of site planning and treatment of par6cing and open space, and liveability for residents and users of the commercial area. 1. City Market - It is generally agreed that this is the best site plan and has the greatest potential to create a strong sense of neighborhood and community. Architectural quality depicted graphically seems closest to the reality of the per square foot costs projected. Of the three plans, the commercial space and associated parking are the least visible. The plan will greatly improve the character of the Frontage Road a4ong the property and provides a good terminus to the commercial strip. This plan offers the greatest number of parking spaces with a large percentage underground. City Market will have 300 spaces for the commercial use. Of those, 170 are on a lower level structure. The ratio of spaces to commercial square footage is 1:200. Garts will provide a ratio of 1:324, with no covered spaces for comrnercial. Loftus will provide a ratio of 1:353 without any covered spaces. Loftus and Garts do provide some structured parking for residential uses. The City Market plan offers a reasonable number and mix of units, with no traffic impact to Chamonix Lane. The architect has successfully benched the grocery store into the hillside, thereby creating a larger portion of the site for residential purposes. The alignment of the residential portion of the site will benefit from good access to sunlight. A negative aspect of the City Market site plan is that the wall along the Vail Das Schone side of the project is an obstacle to good pedestrian and vehicular , connections to the rest of the West Vail commercial area. 2. The Gart Com nies - The positive aspects of the Gart proposal are that there will be no added traffic to Chamonix Lane, there would be facade improvements to the existing Gart and Safeway structures, and the removal of the berm between the two existing properties will improve the flow of vehicular circulation. F:\everyone\andy\memos\council.627 2 o . The negative aspects of the Gart proposal include a weak site plan, no common open space, no pedestrian connections, and no cohesive approach to landscaping. Staff and consultants questioned the appropriateness of single family housing on this site. Though the program for the Vail Commons site offers the greatest potential for creativity and density because of the number of parcels involved, staff and the consultants believe that this proposal does not take advantage of those opportunities. The plan is relatively traditional with single family homes being accessed from cul-de-sacs. The parking structure on the rear of the Safeway site abuts Chamonix Lane and uvould provide an unfriendly streetscape for the neighborhood. 3. Loftus Developments - The Loftus plan provides public open space and landscaped areas and has been improved over the team's initial proposal. The frontage along Chamonix Lane is good. The housing screens the neighborhood from the Safeway parking lights and noise. The back door to Safeway is a vast improvement from the initial design. There are good connections with the Vail Das Schone property for pedestrians and cars. The Vail Commons plaza and the playground/park offer the potential for good, new neighborhood public spaces. There is a good understanding of the topography within the site plan and the Loftus architect has also taken advantage of combining the roof of the grocery store and the eastern portion of the site. Of the three plans, the Loftus proposal is the most urban and most commercially intensive in appearance. The site plan seems rather rigid and axial and much of the open space is hard edged instead of soft. Retail parking and residential parking may be too tight. Additional parking lot area may have to be added to the project. Conventional siting of the supermarket facing the Frontage Road may continue the "strip commercial" appearance of the West Vail area. Arrangement of condominium units is fairly linear. It will take more effort to get natural south light into the units. B. The eutent 4~ whach the propmsal meet the communities need for both housing andl commercaal uses. The three proposals are fairly closely clustered in respect to this criteria. Each provides a similar amount of commercial floor area as well as a similar number of dwelling units. Please refer to the matrix, specifically numbers 1 and 2. IVone of the proposals provide a significantly different amount of commercial floor area or number of dwelling units. As a result, in staff's opinion, all three address this criteria to the same degree. C. The pogentaal o9 the pIaea as proposed to create a "rBppAe effect" resultang in desarabse deve9opment off-site, ancBuding improvemerats and/or the creation of affordab9e housung or commerciaB redevelopnnent in the areas beyond the VaiB ~ommoeas boanndar6es. 1. City Market - City Market is the only proposal vuith a single lot. As a result, there is an apparent disadvantage uvith this proposal in that it does not directly improve other lots in the vicinity. Houvever, staff w?ould like to emphasize that there is a financial return which could be considered a"liquid ripple-effecY'. The City Market proposal includes an annual lease payment uvhich would supply a stream of income to the Touvn for the term of the lease.. The commercial portion of. the lease uvould be from $100,000 to $150,000 per year. Staff believes that this is a sum of money that could be earmarked for other improvements, including employee F:\everyone\andyNnemos\council.627 3 + ~ housing. It should be noted that there is a sales tax increase from the project that could also be combined with the lease payments for community purposes. City Market is the only proposer to include funds to improve the right-of-way to the I- 70/West Vail interchange with a left hand turn lane. 2. Gart Companies - The Gart Companies proposal includes three different parcels. Initially, it appeared that they would be able to provide the greatest ripple effect as they would be making improvements on three different sites. Unfortunately, the potential synergy has not been developed. There are concerns about the architectural treatment of the Safeway renovation, both on the north elevation . facing the neighborhood as well as the south elevation facing the Frontage Road. Although staff believes the architectural changes could be addressed and refined , during a negotiation process, the designs could have gone further than they are currently represented to be. The Gart proposal includes the lowest return to the Town concerning the fees, thereby resulting in the least ability to use the return from this project on other areas or community projects. 3. Loftus Developments - The Loftus proposal involves two sites. There would be a _ renovation to the existing Safeway site and the development of the Vail Commons ,site. It is assumed that they could be tied together across the Vail Das Schone site, however, no funds have been budgeted for those improvements. There would also be a rental revenue stream of $138,000 per year that could be used elsewhere within the community, but it will generate less money over time when compared to City Market. D. Discussion of approach to managing the proposed development. Staff believes that the City Market proposal is the simplest regarding future management. The grocery store would be responsible for all rental units on site. The rest of the dwelling units would be sold and a homeowners association would be established to maintain the development. Other proposals involve a combination of rental and for sale housing which require greater rnanagement expertise. Staff believes that this criterion does not significantly distinguish the three different proposers. E. Ability.to ensure ongoing management of the proposed development and to maintain the development in an aesthetic manner, arad to continue to house the targeted population. Staff believes that the deed restrictions proposed by all three developers adequately address this criteria. F. Price and terms disclosed by the developer. jPlease refer to the matrix attached herefo as Exhibit C for a full understanding of the different ferms.) 1. City Market - The Gity Market proposal is distinctly better than the other two regarding price and terms. While the budget is the highest for City Market, the fees paid to the developers are the lowest. There is a significant difference in residential shell cost per square foot which means that City Market would produce a higher quality residential development that the other two proposals. The reason for the higher quality is that the profit for the developer is the smallest. Staff believes that the City Market proposal has been able to provide the highest F:\everyone\andyUnemos\council.627 4 e 0 budget and the least amount of fees as it is the smaliest team. It is made up of three locals who understand the market and have experience in providing this type of product in the Vail Valley or on the Western Slope. As a result of their local expertise, staff believes that they have been able to provide a leaner proforma than the other twro teams. 2. Gart Companies - Of the three, Gart Companies' proposal has significantly more , developer profit than the other tvvo proposals. Gart Companies has a significantly higher average sales price and significantly higher home price than the other two development proposals. 3. Loftus Developments - Loftus Developments could be considered closer to City Market than Garts. Again, there are differences which make them less attractive than the City Niarket proposal. Please refer to the matrix for a more detailed comparison of the three teams proposed prices and terms. G. Qua9fity and seeccess$u@ implerraentation of corrtparably sBzed developmentse 1. City Market - As mentioned previously, the three members on the City Market team are local and have provided this product locally in the past. Bob UVarner's vuork in Homestead, City MarkeYs work in the Roaring Fork Valley and Avon, and Mark Donaldson's work Iocally, are all known quantities and are successful. 2. Gart Com anies - Gart Companies has also done work locally, however they specialize more in acquisition and redevelopment than development. Gart Companies has an understanding of the issues and requirements to accomplish the tasks. Gart Companies has worked writh Vail Associates and received strong recommendations. 3. Lpftus Developments - Loftus Developments has done extensive work in the Front Range. Their ability to tackle a project of this size has been seen many times in Boulder and the Denver area. H. Wallangness to goan 6n participatooy process BnrioBving Town officia9s and staff, and neBghborhoodl or community groaops. 1. City Market - The team members of Ciry Market have all worked through local development review processes effectively. City Market also has demonstrated its commitment through this selection process. 2. Gart ompanies - The Gart team also has vuorked through the development review process, though not as many times or as extensively as the other twro teams. , 3. Loftus Develo ments - Loftus Developments, being based in Boulder, certainly understands the impact community participation can have. They have successfully uvorked with many different neighborhood groups and have incorporated their comments into projects. F:\everyoneVlndy\memos\council.627 5 ~ . Summarv ? The above analysis of the three proposals based on selection criteria previously developed shows that the City Market proposai meets the criteria better than the other two proposals. ? The market analysis indicates that two stores can operate within the community. ? The traffic impact analysis indicates that ihe City Market proposal would create less of a traffic impact than would the other two proposals. Staff would like to emphasize that the primary gaal for the site is to provide a high quality housing development. The City Market proposal provides the nicest neighborhood, with the highest quality of architectural and site planning features. This is largely a result of City MarkeYs willingness to structure 170 parking spaces for their commercial use. The resulting efficiencies that are created by using structured parking have resulted in an improved site plan for the residential portion of the site. Furthermore, the matrix comparisons indicate that the City Market budget is the largest for both commercial and residential development while their fees are the smallest. The resulting quality is critical to the success of the project. F:\everyone\Andylmemos\council.627 6 Eachibit A y Memogandum ~ lR, To: Andy Knudsen Town of Vail From: Dan Guimond a BRW, Inc. Date: June 21, 1995 BRWING Re: Vail Commons Supermarket Evaluation This memorandum summarizes our evaluation of the market, financial and planning implications of the alternative supermarket development options for the Vail Commons property. There are three basic supermarket development options with variations as described below: 1. New Sa$'evvay. The Loftus proposal contains a new 54,000 square foot Safeway supermarket with 6,000 square feet of additional retail space. The existing 36,000 Safeway would be replaced with 25,000 square feet of new Planning smaller store commercial space. Transportation Engineering 2 ~]e~y Cg~, M~.ket. The City Ivlarket proposal calls for a new 55,000 square Urban Design foot City Market on the Vail Commons property. The existing Safeway store is assumed to remain. A variation on this scenario would be for Safeway to 1475 La"'ren`e expand to an unspecified larger size on the current site to better compete with Suite 300 City Market. Denver, co sozoz 3. ~~panded Saffeway. The Gart Brothers proposal calls for a new 55,000 303/571-4440 square foot Safeway on the existing site and 25,000 square feet of commercial Fax303/571-4448 gnd 10,000 square feet of office on the.Vail Commons site. Denver ][ngrodHgCgflOHd Minneapolis rnoeniX This memo addresses the primary issue of the supportability and implications of the Orlando supermarkets without consideration of the ancillary retail and commercial space. The San Diego supermarket sales and expenditure issues can be separated into six separate questions. seattle Each question will be addressed below. Donald W. Ringrose 1 What is the supermarket trade area for the Vail Commons location and what is Richard P. Wolsfeld the permanent and visitor population of the trade area? Peter E.Jarvis Thomas F. Carroll 2 What is the total amount of supermarket purchases made by Vail trade area Craig A. Amundsen residents and visitors (expenditure potentials)? Donald E. Hunt ]ohn B. McNamara 3 yhat is the current distribution of these purchases (sales inflows and Richard D. Pilgrim outflows)? Dale N. Beckmann Jeffrey L. Benson 4. How will the three development options alter the current sales flows? Ralph C. Blum Gary J. Erickson - 26983961.MDG John C. Lynch Paul N. Bay J 5. How will the additional levels of space and competition affect the viability of the individual stores? 6. How much additional sales and sales tax revenues will be captured in the Town of Vail as a result of the various supermarket development options? The estimates of the sales flows are based on a combination of actual store sales and market survey . data provided by Safeway, City Market, and the Town of Vail. Other estimates are made by BRW based on its experience in retail development feasibility at other locations. Trade E1rea Safeway considers the Vail Valley from East Vail to Intermountain (Census Tracts 95.35. 95.36, and 95.37) as the primary trade area for their Vail supermarket. They estimate the total annual equivalent population of the trade area by using single family equivalent sewage flows as measured by the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District. The District has estimated 7,563 year-round equivalent single family units for the primary trade area in 1995. Based on an average household size of 2.4 persons, the estimated year-round population would be 18,151 persons. This is a good way to estimate the year-round population, as dealing with unit types and occupancies adds additional estimates and assumptions. However using unit types and occupancies as a point of comparison, this figure would equate to the permanent population plus an average 60 percent annual occupancy of Vail Associates' estimate of the Vail Valley guest capacity of 22,633 persons. We therefore believe tfie Sanitation District estimates to be a reasonable estimate of actual occupancy. Given the closer proximity of Minturn to West Vail than Avon, it could be argued that it should also be part of the primary trade area. If so, it would add an additional 593 single family equivalent units or.1,423 additional equivalent residents to the trade area. The total 19,574 population which would represent an eight percent increase in the trade area over Safeway's estimate. According to City Market's proposal submittal, the Vail trade area has a total population equivalent of 18,900 including resident population and visitors. This number is four percent greater than Safeway's figure of 18,151. Trade Area Expenditures Safeway estimates weekly grocery store-type expenditures of $33.33 per capita in Vail, which multiplied against the trade area population results in expenditure potentials of $604,793 per week or $31.4 million per year. City Market estimates $36.00 in per capita sales which equates to $680,400 per week, or $35.4 million per year, in supermarket expenditure potentials. Safeway's more conservative estimate of the trade area population multiplied against its more conservative estimate of sales per capita results in nearly a 13 percent difference in potential sales compared to City Market. 2 26983961.MDG 0 JaleS IFlOWS Sales outflows or leakage is calculated by subtracting actual store sales from expenditure potentials as estimated above. Grocery store-type sales include convenience stores, supermarkets and other grocery and specialty food stores. Safeway has estimated current total grocery store-type sales in Vail stores at $455,000 per week or $23.7 million per year and City Market has estimated current sales at $410,000 per week or $$21.3 million per year. Based on Town of Vail sales tax receipts data, BRW was able to place 1994 actual sales at $426,189 per week or $22.2 million per year. This was comprised of sales of $324;266 per week or $16.9 million for the year for Safeway and $5.3 million for four other stores selling grocery-type goods. Subtracting the actual total grocery store sales figure from Safeway's estimate of total expenditure potentials of $604,492 would result in an outflow or leakage of $178,784 per week or 30 percent as shown in Table 1 below. Subtracting actual sales from City Market's estimates of total expenditure potentials would result in 37 percent sales leakage, or $254,211 per week as shown. Table Il Vail Supeamarket Sales li'lows Safewmy City 1lqarket Weekly Annual Week Annuml Trade Area Population 18,151 18,151 18,900 18,900 Sales per Capita 33.33 $ 1,733 36.00 $ 1.872 Total Sales Potential $604,973 $31,458,587 $680,400 $35,380,800 Vail Sales - 426 189 -$22,161,817 - 426 189 -$22.161.817 Sales Outflow $178,784 $ 9,296,770 $254,211 $13,218,983 Percent Outflow 30 % 30 % 37 % 37 % Source: City Market, Safeway and Town of Vail D'asgrabuntion of Sales Oaagff9oevs The next question is where are these sales outflows or leakages taking place? According to City 1Vlarket, sales outflow from Vail to its Avon store equal $70,000 per week or $3.64 million per year. Subtracting the Avon City Market sales and existing Vail grocery store sales from expenditure potentials, there would be $108,784 per week or $5.7 million per year in other sales outflows using Safeway's estimate of expenditure potential. There would be $184,211 per week or $9.6 million of additional sales outflow using City Market's estimate of expenditure potentials as shown in Table 2 below. 3 26983961. M DG Table 2 Vaal Supermarket Sales Outflow Safeway - City Market - Weekly Annual Weekly Annual Total Sales Potential $604,973 $31,458,587 $680,400 $35,380,800 Safeway Sales -$324,266 -$16,861,817 -$324,266 -$16,861,817 Other Vail Stores - 101 923 -$5,300,000 - 101 923 -$5,300,000 Outflow from Vail $178,784 $9,296,770 $254,211 $13,218,983 Percent Outflow 30 % 30 % 37 % 37 % Ciry Market Avon Sales - 70 000 -$3,640,000 - 70 000 -$3,640.000 Outflow to Denver $108,784 $5,656,770 $184,211 $9,578,983 Percent Outflow 18 % 18 % 27 % 27 % Source: City Market, Safeway and Town of Vail Most of these sales outflows are made by Vail area residents making trips to Denver or Glenwood Springs to big box stores such as Wal Mart, Sam's Club, Cub Foods to stock up on dry goods and health and beauty products where the costs savings can be substantial. According to a Safeway market study completed in October 1994, Vail residents spend an average of $190 per trip for these purchases on out of town shopping excursions. The market study indicated the number of trips per household was no more often than monthly, but did not establish an average figure that could be used for calculations. While it is logical for the permanent population and even the seasonal-owner population to make these cost saving stocking up shopping trips to Denver, the guest population is not doing so. Using the most inclusive definition of permanent resident population (including both year round and seasonal owners), there would be a total trade area population of 12,387 or 5,161 households, according to the Vail Associates pillow count estimates. Under Safeway's estimates, these resident households would spend an annual total of $1,096 or $91 per month to account for the estimated sales outflow. Under City Market's estimates, they would spend $1,856 per year or $155 per month. The estimate of sales outflow based on City Market's expenditure potentials would appear to be the more accurate figure. We have therefore used it in the calculations below. Estimate of Net New Sales The first question regarding the supermarket development alternatives is how much of the estimated outflow could be recaptured by adding either an expanded store or a second supermarket chain in West Vail. Either an expanded Safeway store or a new City Market would add additional departments not found in the current Safeway such as a pharmacy, expanded deli, and seafood counter, as well as provide expanded and more specialized product lines in other departments such as produce. The additional variety available would reduce sales outflows and would also generate net new purchases from visitors not being made at present. In terms of sales outflows, these additions would probably cut more into sales outflows to Avon than to sales outflows to Denver. City Market would add a level of competition to the Vail market that . would likely result in some price reductions that should reduce the incentive to, buy as much at 4 26983961.Mnc 0 Denver big box stores. However, this type of infrequent stocking up trip at the big discounters is a common shopping practice by many shoppers even in the Denver metropolitan area. So, these trips would not be entirely eliminated. All of the sales outflow would therefore not be recaptured in either case. The greatest level of sales capture would happen if there were two competitive supermarkets in Vail. BRW has estimated total Vail grocery store sales potentials based on the adding a City Market versus expanding the current Safeway in Table 3 below based on the following assumptions. ° Tvvo Sanpermarkets. If a City Market were added in West Vail, all of the existing outflow to Avon City Market could be recaptured as well as an estimated 50 percent of the outflow elsewhere. 0 Oaae 3angermarket. An expanded Safeway would provide a greater variety of supermarket goods in Vail but would not provide the same level of price competition achieved with two stores. It would therefore not capture all of the sales going to City Market in Avon, nor would it capture as much of the outflow out of the region. We have estimated a capture rate of 50 percent of the City Market Avon sales outflow and 25 percent of the remaining sales outflow as shown. 'g'able 3 Vaafl Saapea-market Sales Recaptaare 5afeway City Market Vi'eekly Amnual Weekly Annaaa9 Cunent Vail Grocery Sales $426,189 $22,161,817 $426,189 $22,161, 817 City Market Sales Capture Rate 50% 50% 100% 100% City Market Avon Sales $35,000 $1,820,000 $70,000 $3,640,000 Sales Outflow Recapture Rate 25 % 25 % 50 % 50 % Sales Outflow Recapture 6 053, $2,394,746 92 106 $4.789,492 Total Vail Grocery Sales $507,242 $26,376,563 $588,294 $30,591,309 . Source: City Market, Safeway and BRW, Inc. . Based on these assumptions, a new City Market plus the existing or expanded Safeway would generate total annual sales of $30.6 million, which is $8.4 million above today's level. The expanded Safeway development option would generate annual sales of $26.4 million or $4.2 million above current levels. SaIles ][,evefls aand Safles Tax Captaare The next step is to estimate the distribution of these store sales expected under the various ~ development proposals. We have estimated total store sales and total sales tax revenues for a new Safeway store and a new City Market as shown in Table 4 below. 5 26983961.MDG • Table 4 - Supermarket Amnual Sales and Sales Tax Revenues New New Safeway City Market Total Grocery Sales Potentials $26,376,563 $30,591,309 Sales to Other Existing Stores - 5,300,000 - 5,300,000 Total Supermarket Sales Potentials $21,076,563 $25,291,309 Local Sales Transfers $526,914 $1,264,565 Supermarket Sales plus Local Transfers $21,603,477 $26,555,874 Square Feet of Space 55,000 91,000 Sales per Square Foot $393 ' $292 Total Current Safeway Sales $16,861,817 $16,861,817 Net Change $4,741,660 $8,429,492 Net Sales Tax Growth $189,666 $387,762 Source: BRW, Inc. New Safeway Store. In calculating the supermarket sales potential, we have assumed that the additional variety and choice provided would result in a 2.5 percent increase in overall sales due to the diversion of sales from other grocery, food and other convenience goods establishments. Based on this supermarket sales potentials increase from $21.1 million to $21.6 million. These annual sales levels would result in sales of $392 pei square foot for Safeway based on a 55,000 square foot store and would generate net new sales taxes of $189,666 as shown. New City Market and Existing Safeway. With the greater variety and price competition associated with two stores, we have assumed a capture of,five percent additional sales diverted from other stores. As a result, there would be a total of $26.6 million in supermarket sales potentials. If the two stores shared these sales proportionately, there would be average sales of $292 per square foot. The net sales tax increase would be $387,762 as shown. Based on the estimated sales levels, the following points can be made regarding the three basic supermarket development options: 0 If a new Safeway was built on the Vail Commons property, it would be a highly profitable store with estimated sales of $22.1 million or $402 per square foot. This store would also provide the additional variety inherent with a larger store. However, with a relative monopoly on the market, it would not provide the level of price competition present with two stores and would therefore likely not result in the same level of reduction in sales outflows. 0 If City Market is built on the Vail Commons property, it will be the largest store with the most variety. It would therefore be expected to capture a large portion of the area sales and cut into Safeway's current sales levels. City Market has stated they expect to capture sales of $350,000 per week or $18.2 million per year. If they are successful in doing so, Safeway would be forced to either run a less profitable store or replace its existing store with an expanded store now or at some point in the future. 6 26983961.MDG d i ~ If Safeway decided to expand its existing store to compete with a new and larger City iVlarket, the two stores would be expected to more or less split most of the supermarket sales in the City. Based on projected sales levels, these two stores would share total sales of $26.6 million. With 100,000 square feet of total supermarket space, there would be average sales of $13.3 million per store or $242 per square foot. Conclaasioans It is difficult to measure precisely the sales potential of a new store as its sales will be derived from a number of sources including capturing sales outflows, taking sales from existing competitors and generating unrealized sales from areas residents and visitors. To a great degree, the differences in estimates of total sales potentials and sales outflows between Safeway and City 1Vlarket are explainable and reflect the biases that each store has in this situation. It is clear there are sufficient sales potentials to support an expanded Safeway. In our opinion, there are also sufficient sales outflows, and opportunities to gain sales from competition, to attract a competitive chain such as City Market to open a new store and compete with the existing Safeway store. It is likely that a new expanded City Market would take considerable sales from a smaller existing Safeway. Safeway could continue to operate its existing store at lower sales levels because they have a low basis in the property and it is therefore relatively inexpensive to operate. It is also possible that Safeway could try to protect its turf by expanding their current store, either at the current time, or at some point in the future when overall sales potentials increase. A third possibility is that they would decide to close their store. The additional choice and selection associated with either supermarket expansion option is a benefit to the community. And in general, there are some additional benefits associated with the variety and price competition inherent with two stores over one. 7 26983961.MDG e Exhibit ]B : Memorandum TO: Ancfly IKnudt.sen, 'B'owan of Vail FROMe ][{aa-? Buchholz, Bfl2W Kc~~ SNB,bECTo 'd'raffes Analysis foa° Vail Conanors Pa-oposals B R W INC. DATEo June 21, 1995 I have completed a review of the site generated traffic for the three Vail Commons proposals. The following is a summary of findings and key assumptions used in the analysis. . o Land uses for each proposal were based on the site plans provided in the proposals and information provided, by Town of Vail staff. The TTE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trin Generation Nlanual (5th Ed ) PlaM'n8 and grocery sales analysis figures were used to develop projected traffic Transportation volumes for the ANT, PNT and weekday traffic periods. The attached Engineering tables show the expected site generated traffic volumes by land use for Urban Design each proposal. 1475 Lawrence o The Loftus proposal, which includes redevelopment of the existing Denvero Safeway site and a new Safeway at Vail Commons, would generate the co 80202 highest daily volume of traffic at about 9,300 vehicles per day (vpd). 303/571-4440 This volume is about 10 percent higher than the expected daily traffic Fax 303/571-4448 generated by the proposed Gart/EI.KCO development (8,400 vpd) and about 35 percent higher than the proposed City Market development Denve= (6,750 vpd). Minneapolis Phcenix O There are two primary reasons for the difference in total daily traffic orlanao volumes between the three proposals. First, the Loftus proposal includes San Diego 8,000 SF of restaurant space and restaurants typically generate more Seattle traffic than general retail or residential land uses. Second, the total Donald WRingrocery related traffic under the City 1Vlarket proposal (existing Safeway Richard P. Wolsfeld Plus new City lViarket), is constrained by the market demand for gracery Peter E. Jarvis retail in the West Vail area (ref. Dan Guimond'.s memo 6-21-95). In Thomas F. Carroll other words, the traffic generated by two grocery stores is not simply Craig A. Amundsen twice that of one store because the overall sales (and therefore traffic Donald E. Hunt volume) do not increase commensurately with the increase in space. This John B. McNaman 1S also the case if the existing Safeway store were to be expanded to Richard D. Pilgrim 55,000 SF under the "City Market proposal. Dale N. Beckmann Jeffrey L. Benson Ralph C. Blum Gary J. Erickson John C. Lynch Paul N. Bay r • Although there is a measurable difference in total daily site generated traffic between each proposed development, the difference in peak hour traffic volumes would be less noticeable. During the peak traffic hour (PM), the L.oftus and Gart/ELKCO developments would each generate approximately 740 vehicles per hour (vph). The City Market development would generate about 570 vph. Thus the Loftus and Gart/ELKCO developments would essentially have the same impact on the exisdng street system during the peak traffic period. The City Market proposal would have a lesser impact during critical traffic periods. • Based on existing travel patterns in the West Vail area, it is expected that 60 percent of the traffic will travel through the West Vail I-70 interchange to access the site. At the North Frontage Road/Chamonix Lane intersection, the site generated traffic would represent a 30 percent increase over existing traffic volumes for the Loftus and -Gart/ELKCO proposed developments and a 20 percent increase for the City Market development, during the PM peak hour. Given this interchange's cunent overcapacity condition during peak periods, excessive motorist delay and vehicle queuing can be expected for all three development scenarios. Interchange reconstruction and a grade separated crossing of I-70 at Simba Run would help to ameliorate existing traffic congestion as well as future traffic demands. In summary, the City Market proposed development would have the lowest overall (daily) traffic impact while the Loftus proposal would have the highest impact. During the PM peak traffic period, when traffic congestion is most critical, the Loftus and Gart/ELKCO proposed developments would have a similar level of impact on traffic operations at the existing West Vail interchange. The . City Market proposal would also have a significant impact, but to a lesser extent. Expansion of the existing Safeway under the City Market proposal would have little or no additional impact to the sunounding street system. cc: Greg Hall, Town of Vail Chris Cares, RRC Dan Guimond, BRW y VaIlR CCommons Mas~eir - Tir~~~~ ~oft~~ ProposaR Vail Commons Site Land YJse Trip Generation Rates Trip Generarion Volumes n'E Mf Peak Houu PA1 Peak Hour Weekda Passer-b AM Peak Hour h PM Peak Hour (vph) Weekda S've Unit T.Q Code Rete In Out Rete In Out ADT Rate Reducti on Volume In Out Volume In put Grce eiy Store 34 1000 SF 650 2.01 70% 30% 10.34 51 % 49°. 125 26°/. 78 55 23 402 205 197 4860 Resfaurant 4 IOOOSF 832 IA.BI SI% 491/o 12.92 56% 44% 177.87 40% 36 IS 17 31 17 14 427 , Sh Crntet / Grneral Reteil 2 I000 SF 620 2.16 63'e 3T/e 8.44 SO% 50% ' 91.63 9% 4 2 1 15 8 B 167 Residrntel Condo / Tovmhome 57 DU 230 0.44 17% 83% 0.55 66 % 34 % 5.86 25 4 21 31 21 11 334 Raidrntial Aputirnents 16 DU 220 0.51 I T/e 63 % 0.63 68% 32 % 6.47 8 1 7 10 7 3 104 General Offitt 0 1000SF 710 31 89°/. 11% 3.4 IT/e 83% 24.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TotalSiteTra6c: ISI 81 70 490 238 232 5891 Existin Safe«:a y Site I,and Use Trip Generation Rates Tri Generation Volumes w«tae (I~E AM Peak Hour PA1 Peak Hour Weekda Passrn AM Peak Hour (vph) PM Peak Hour (vph) Siu Unit T.G. Code Rate In Out Rate In Out ADT Rate Reduction Volume In Out Vohune orocffy Store 0 1000 SF 8511 2.01 70% 30% 1034 51 % 49% 125 28% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Fest Food 4 I000 SF 834 55.87 SI`e A9°s 36.56 52 % 48'e 710 50% 112 37 35 73 38 35 1420 Sh ' Crnttt/GeneialRetail 21 IOOOSF 820 2.16 63% 3T/. 6.44 500/0 SOYe 91.65 91% 41 26 IS 161 BI 61 1751 Raidmtie! Condo / Townhome 36 DU 230 0.44 I T/e 83 % 0.35 66 % 34% 5.66 16 3 13 20 13 7 211 RaidrntialA rnts 0 DU 220 0.31 17/• 83% 0.63 66% 32% 6.47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totel Site Tradu: 169 86 83 254 1321 122 3382 Total Tratflc Volume Both Sites : 320 167 153 744 389 353 9274 BRW 6/21 /93 Vail Commons Master Plan -Traffic Analysis City Market Proposal with Existing Safeway Vail Commons Site Land Use Trip Generation Rates Trip Generation Volumes !fE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Wakda Passer-b AM Peak Hour h PM Peak Hour h Weekda Siu Unit T.G. Code Rete In Out Ra[e In Out ADT Rete Reducuon Voliune In Out Volume In Out NO) GGrocery Store' SS IOOOSF 850 1.45 70% 30% 7.45 51% 49% 90.6 28°/. S'7 40 17 295 150 145 3586 Fest Food Retail 0 1000 SF 834 55.87 31'e 49% 36.56 52% 48% 710 SOYe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shopping Crnttt / General Retnil S 1000 SF 820 2.16 63 % 3T/e 8.44 SO % 50 % 91.65 9Ye 10 6 4 38 19 19 417 Residrntial Condo / Townhome 53 DU 230 0.44 I T/e 63% 0.55 66% 34•. 5.66 23 4 19 29 19 10 311 Residrnual A artrnrnb 12 DU 220 0.51 I T/. 83 % 0.63 66Y. 32 % 6.47 6 ' 1 3 8 S 2 78 General OtSce 0 1000 SF 710 3.2 89•/. 11 % 3.4 177• 83% 24.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Site Treffic: 97 51 45 370 194 176 4393 Existin Safewa v Site Land Use TFip Generation Rates Trip Generation Volumes W«kda ffE AA1 Peak Hour PR1 Pwk Hour Wmkda Passer- AM Peak Hom h PM Peak Houv (vph) Size Unit T.G. Code Rste In Out Rate Out ADT Rete eduction Volume Out Vo cffocery Storc ' 36 1000 SF 850 IAS 70•/. 30Y. 7.45 SI % 49°/. 90.6 28°/. 38 26 11 193 98 95 2348 Fazt Food Retail 0 1000 SF 634 55.87 51% 49°/. 36.56 52'/e 48°/. 710 S(N/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 'al Retail 0 IOOOSF 814 6.41 48% 52% 4.93 57°/. 43% 40.67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Raidrntiel Condo / Townhome 0 DU 230 0.44 17% 83 % 0.55 66 34 % 5.86 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 ResidrnCalA aztrnrnts 0 DU 220 0.51 IT/e 83% 0.63 68% 32% 6.47 0 0 0 0 0 P271 0 Total Site Tta~c: 38 26 11 193 96' 2348 Total Trsfllc Volume (Both Sites): 134 78 57 563 293 6741 ' Nota Trieneration iata ad'usted to reflect sala trntial with hvo grocery stores BRW 6/22/95 ~ o ~~IlIl CCommons Masteg° Plan - TE°affic Anafl~s'is . Gart / EL~~~ PiroposaR Vail Commons Site Y.and gJse Trip Generation Rates Trip Generation Volumes ITE Mf Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Wttkda Pusa-b AM Peek Hour h PM Peek Hout (vph) Weekda Size Unit T.G. Code Rate In Out Rete In Out ADT Rate Reduction Vohvne In Qrt Vdume In Out Grocery Storc 0 l000 SF 850 2.01 70% 30 % 10.34 51 % 49Ye 123 28% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fast Food Retail 0 1000 SF 834 35.87 SI % 49^/e 36.56 • 52•/. 4g^/. 710 S(p/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sho ' Crnta/GenerelRetail 25 IOOOSF 820 2.16 63% 3T/. 8.44 sp% Sp•/. 91,65 q•/ 49 31 18 192 gb % 2083 Residrntiel Condo / Townhome 60 DU 230 0.44 ?T/e 63 % 0.55 66Ye 34% 5.86 26 4 22 33 22 11 352 S' e-Fem' DetachedHous' IB DU 210 0.74 26% 74% 1.01 65% 35% 9.33 13 3 10 IB 12 6 172 ~ffice 10 1000 SF 710 3.2 89% 11% 3.4 17Ye 83•/. 24.6 32 28 4 34 6 28 246 Total Site TreHic: 121 67 53 277 133 142 2835 Existin Safewti Site ]Land YTse Trip Generation Rates TriGeneration Volumes ' w«tae li'E AM Peak Hour PM Peek Hour Weekda pauer-b M1 Peak Hour h PM Peak Nour h Sitt Unit G. Code Rate put Rate In Out ADT Rete Reduction Volume In Out Vo Grocery Storc SS 1000 SF 850 2.01 70% 30% 10.34 51% 49% 123 28'. BO 56 24 409 209 201 4950 Fast Food Reteil 0 1000 SF 634 55.87 SI % 49% 36.56 32 % 48% 710 30% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shopping Crnta/GenetslRetail 4 IOOOSF 820 2.16 63% 037.*/* 8.44 50% S!N/e 91.65 8 S 3 31 IS IS 334 Residmtinl Condo / Townhome 0 DU 230 0.41 17% 0.55 66 % 34•. 3.86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RaidencelA ertmrnts 36 DU 220 0.51 IT/e 0.63 681% 32% 6.47 18 3 IS 23 IS 7 23; Toml Si4 Tre6c: 106 64 42 463 240 ' 223 5517 'I'oQal TratYlc Volume (Both Sites : 227 131 95 740 375 365 ~371 ]BRW 6/21 /93 Exhibit C ~ „ Cgty Marlcet Gart Loftus Cognpanies Developments 1. Densiry IVumber of Dwelling Units - Vail Commons Site For-sale 53 78 57 Rental 12 Q i-6 Total 65 d.u. 78 d.u. 73 du. Allowed Density per Zoning Code 78 d.u. (Plus Type III EHLJ's) GRFA proposed on Vail Commons 167,900 sq. ft. 90,700 sq. ft. 68,910 sq. ft. GRFA allowed per zoning code - 85,931.4 sq. ft. IVumber of Dwelling Units -0- Off-site 36 d.u. 36 d.u. Note: 36 "off-site" Note: 36 "off-site" units may not be units may not be deed restricted. deed restricted. 2. Net Add'1 Square Footage For all Properties in the West Vail Area Retail or Restaurant 5,000 28,800 31,000 Grocery 55,000 20,000 19,000 Office -L- 10.000 Q Total 60,000 sq..ft. 58,000 sq. ft. 50,000 sq, ft. 3. Budget for Vail Commons . Com. and multi fam. housing $ 8.9 $ 4.1 $ 6.2 For-sale housing $ 6•7 10.2 L6.3 Total $15.8 million $ 143 million $12.5 million 4. Retum to the Town from Vail C. Residential Fee $ 80,520 per year $2,044,500 one time $ 427,500 one time Retail and Office $100- 150.000 ner vear $ 825.000 one time $ 138.000 per yeaz Tota1 , $180,520 $2,869,500 $ 565,500 Present Value Calculations (5%) . Residential Fee $1,237,790 30 years $2,044,500 one time $ 427,500 one time Retail and Office $2.021.979 30 years $ 825.000 one time S2.121.398 30 yeus Total $3,259,768 $2,869,500 $2,548,898 Updated 6/23/95 F:\everyone\andy\commoa9\metiix608 1 ; City Market Gart Loftus . Compaaies Developments 5. Land Ownership Pattern Commercial Lease Sale Lease Residenrial Lease Sa1e - Sale 6. Fees for Vail Commons Developer Fee 0% or $0.00 3.5% or $480,727 4.2% or $400,000 Real Estate Commission 2% or $133,198 5% or $500,000 6.0% or $403,200 Builders Fee 8% or $530,000 5% or $537,508 4.0% or $279,633 For-sale housing profit $18,000 per or Per dwelling unit & Total $0.00 $1,385,966 $0.00 Total Fees $663,918 $2,904,201 $1,082,833 7. Calculations per squaze foot for residential on Vail Commons Constiutuion cost (shell only) $ 76.36 $ 64.90 $ 64.40 Total Construction cost $112.50 . $112.52 $115.06 , (Includes contingency fees, permits, etc:) 8. Range of Sales Prices Studio/Condominium $109,500 $ 89,000-$135,000 $ 90,0004105,000 Townhouse $117,500-$159,500 $140,000-$185,000 $120,0004170,000 Duplex/Single Family, . $157,500 $189,9004275,000 Average Sales Price $112.50 $150.27 $122.56 9. Monthly Payment on a Typical 3 bedroom 3 bedrrom 3 bedrrom Townhouse 1400 sq. ft. 1300 sq. ft. 1400 sq ft. $160,000 $175,000 $170,000 Principal and Interest (io% aoWO) $1107 $1211 $1176 Home owners association dues $ 132 $ 73* $ 129 Land Rent 140 -0- -0- Total $1379 $1284 (*does not $1305 include reserve) Updated 6/23/95 F:\everyone\andy\commons\matrix.608 2 " City Mae-ket Gart ILoftus Corripanies Deve?opments 10. Commercial Parking for Vail Commons Total Number 300 108 - 170 Number of Covered Commercial Spaces 170 0 0 Note: 50 spaces aze Note: 46 spaces aze structured for 2nd structured for 2nd level condos. level residential Rado-- Spaces: Comm Sq Ft 1:200 1:324 1:353 (note: parking may need to be increased for residential portion of site). 11. Number of parking spaces n/a 107 58 located off the Vail Commons site which aze structured. 12. Loading and Delivery for grocery store. Size of Area 30 X 105 30 X 75 23 X 60 Underground/Screened underground underground underground Ease of access all tuming can be all turning can be requires use of Vail accommodated on- accommodated on- Das Schone for site site access 13. Landscaping Total Area 93,806 sq. ft. 114,776 sq. ft. 112,944 sq. ft. Amount allocated to plant $260,000 $138,405 $177,000 material and imgation 14. Number of dwelling units to serve on-site commercial. 12 units to be owned 0 units 16 (not necessarily by City Mazket owned by Safeway) 15. AccelUDecell. $360,000 Total $20,000 for Safeway $260,000 to be $300,000 State and West Vail covered by $300,000 $30,000 City Market AccelUDecell lanes grant $30,000 Town of Vail Other costs to be AccelUDece11 covered by State adjacent to V.C. Grant Center tum lane from V.C. to interchange., 16. Community Daycare paid by $105,065 -0- $225,000 residential portion of project Updated 6/23/95 F:\everyone\andy\commonslmetrix.608 3 City Market Gart Loftus ~ Counpanies Developments 17. Team Members Developer - City Developer - Tom Developer - Jim Individuals/Role Market Gart and Steve Loftus Contractor - Robert Elkins - Contractor - Shaw Warner Contractor - Construction Architect - Mark Colorado First Architect - Mike Donaldson Architects - Mulhern Humphreys and Sales - Bob Kendalll Pariners, Wyatt Housing - John and Associates Young Housing " Management - Jonathan Rose/AHDC Updated 6/23/95 F:\everyone\andy\commons\matrix.608 4 o CITY MARKET GART COMPANIES LOFTUS DEVELOPMENTS COSTS PSF COSTS PSF COSTS PSF CONSTRUCTION COSTS Hard Costs 4,544,750 68% 76.36 5,880,081 57% 64.83 3,531,052 56% 64.40 Site improvements Landscaping 212,000 3% 3.56 103,804 1% 1.14 100,000 2% 1.82 Parking 39,456 <1 % 0.44 Utilities 95,400 1% 1.60 413,104 4% 4.55 Walks & Paths 10,750 0% 0.18 18,225 <1 % 0.20 Signage • 12,000 <1% 0.13 Curb & Gutter 5,813 <1 % 0.06 ` Roads 116,600 2% 1.96 43,594 <1% 0.48 Excavation 67,140 1 % 0.74 Lighting 9,000 <1 % 0.10 Total 434,750 6% 7.30 712,136 7% 7.85 100,000 2% 1.62 Soft Costs Architecture & Engineerin 280,900 4% 4.72 279,244 3% 3.08 188,690 3% 3.44 Permits & Tap Fees 278,250 4% 4.67 400,000 4% 4.41 431,898 7% 7.88 Legal/ Accounting/ Ins 84,184 1% 1.41 120,147 1% 1.32 55,466 1% 1.01 Sales Commission 133,918 2% 2.25 500,000 5% 5.51 403,,200 6% 7.35 Construction Interest 212,000 3% 3.56 260,000 3% 2.87 330,000 5% 6.02 Developer Fee 353,636 3% 3.90 400,000 6% 7.30 Builders Fee 530,000 8% 8.90 537,508 5% 5.93 279,633 4% 5.10 Miscellaneous 56,962 1% 1.04 Total 1,519,252 23% 25.53 2,450,535 24% 27.02 2,145,849 34% 39.14 Other Community Center 105,065 2% 1.77 0 225,000 4% 4.10 Underground Parking 135,000 1% 1.49 Gazebo 15,000 <1 % 0.17 Total 1 5, 5 % 1.77 150,000 1% 1. 5 225,506 4% 4.1 Contingency 92,061 1% 1.55 1,045;010 10% 11.52 307,048 5% 5.60 Offsite Improvements Relocate Water Line 0 24,375 <1 % 0.27 0 Total Project 6 695,878 1 112.5 1U,262,137 100% 113.14 6 308 949 100% 115.06 Total Square Footage 59,519 90,700 54,830 Totai Cost Per Square Feet 112.50 113.14 115.06 COMMBUD.WK4 Page 1 06/23/95 Leasing Commercial PROS CONS 1. Retain land as an asset for future use 1. Makes it more difficult for developers by community. to secure financing (without deed subordination). 2. Income generated through leasing exceeds income from sale (assum es a 79 year lease). 3. Provides for limited control of retail . users. Leasing Residential PROS CONS 1. Provides land as an asset to the future 1. Though possible, makes individual cornmunity of Vail (assuming Town mortgages difficult to secure. buys out homeowners at end of lease). 2. Reduces up-front costs to individual 2. May be very difficult near end of lease homeowner. to sell dwelling units (may require buyout responsibility by Town). 3. Reduces tax burden to individual 3. Diminishes sense of roots within the homeowner by 10% to 20%. community. . 4. Control of use as employee housing is adequately addressed through deed , restrictions. Control may be more , effective if land is held by multiple owners. f:\everyone\endy\commonslcommpros.612 Exhibit D ~~~~~~~N CPUTERJA 1. Review and discussion of the proposed development plan(s), including project scale and land use interrelationships. Qualiry of site planning and treatment of parking and open space, and livability for residents and users of the commercial area. Imagination and creativity in land planning, as evidenced by plans for the Vail Commons site and in previous work, an ability to meet the quality expectations of the. town, and design as evidenced by previous projects will be evaluated. 2. The extent to which the proposal meets the communiry's needs for both housing and corrimercirad uses. Site planning concepts will be evaluated on whether they address the identified community need and the long-term needs of the residents . and shoppers. For example, family units must be designed to be livable, with appropriate amenities and open spaces. Pedestrian/bicycle access through the site . should be sensitive to the Vail Commons n to the larger needs of West Vail: These and other community benefits will be considered in the review process. 3. The potential of the plan cas proposed to crecate a"ripple efJ'ect" resulting in desirable development off-site, including improvements and/or the creration of affordable housing or comm ercial redevelopment in areas bevond the Vail Commons boundaries. Development on the Vail Commons represents an important oppornanity for other actions in the larger West Vail area; your plans will be evaluated based on any contributions to West Vail, both on and off the site. 4. Discussion of approach to managing the proposed development. The Town seeks to ensure that residential development will remain affordable within the guidelines proposed. 5. Ability to ensure ongoing management of the proposed development and to . maintain the development in an aesthetic manner, and to continue to house the targeted population will be evaluated. 6. Price and terrns disclosed bv the developer. The total offer to the Town of Vail, the structure of that offer, and the financial capability of the developer team to cany out the proposed site development will be carefully considered. The ability to secure financing, and to complete all negotiations withe the Town for the proposed development in a timely and expeditious manner, is important. 7• Quality cand successful implementation of compcarably sized developments. Affordable residential development experience and commercial developmeat experience of a similar nature and at a similar scope will be viewed favorably, and the commitment to quality as evidenced by previous developments and their aesthetics will be considered. . 8. Willingness to join in participatorv process involving Town officials and staff, cand neighborhood or community groups (as required). Ta: Town Council From: Andy Knudtsen, Vail Commons Project Manager , Subject: Market analysis data Date: June 27, 1995 Please note that all of the information provided in the attached letter from Howard Gerelick, the Safeway Store Development Director; has been communicated to the Town's consultant, Dan Guimond. Staff requested that Mr. Guimond review the information, discuss it with Safeway, and provide a separate analysis of the market potential. Mr. Guimond's report is included as Eglaibit A in the Council packet. f:bveryma\aodykommm s\nom.627 . . , - ,~ECEIVED JttP~ 1 2 9g~ ~'uNca - 6900 S. YOSEMI7E o EPIGLEWOOD, CO 80112•1412 P.O. BOX 5927 TA (303) 843-7600 DEMVER, CO 80217 June 8, 1995 The Honorable Peggy Osterfoss Mayor of the Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 RE: Safeway Store Vail, Co Dear Mayor Osterfoss: I have reviewed the City 1tRarket's analysis of the potential of another store in Vail with great interest and i found it flawed in several areas. I hope to .present additional facts based upon our research to demonstrate the additional sales tax revenues City Market is projecting are not possible. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that City Market could generate the sales they are projecting without taking substantial sales away from the existing stores in Vail. Any analysis of potential sales for a store begins with defining the market area. We believe the primary trade area for Vail is census tracks 9535, 9536, and 9537 consisting . of the sub communities of Glen Lyon, Lions Ridge, Inter-Mountain, West Vail, Gore Valley, Bighorn, Vail Village and Vail Mountain. Based upon research conducted by the Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District, they projected the equivalent of 7,563 single family units within this area in 1994 growing to 7,753 u:uts in 1997. Using the findings from Consumer Research conducted by Creative & Response Research Services, Inc. for Safeway in October 1994, the average family size in the trade area is 2.4 persons. Multiplying the average family size by the number units (7,563 x 2.4 persons) results in an average year round population of 18,151 people. Our same research reveals that the average per capita expenditure for grocery store type merchandise is $33.33 per person. Multiplying this times the number of people provides the total market potential for weekly grocery store sales (18,151 people x$33.33 per person equals $604,972). ~ Recy"~ed PaW . ~ The Honorable Peggy Osterfoss Page 2 ' Now that the total market potential has been deternuned, it is easy to determine how much is leaving the area. By subtracting how much business is being done by the existing Vail stores from the total market potential gives us the leakage. According to the Colorado Department of Revenue, total grocery stores' sales in Vail averaged $455,000 per week. Subtracting this from the total available gives us the total leakage ($604,972-$455,000 „ equals $149,972). This $149,972 is only 24.8% of the total available and is substantially less than the 40% estimated by City Market. Furthermore, City Market stated in their May 16, 1995 presentation that they get approximately $50,000/week from the Vail trade area. Subtracting the $50,000/week from the total leakage of $149,972 leaves $99,972 leakage to other stores outside Vail and Avon, most likely to Denver azea stores. Our research confirms this leakage to Denver in that nearly 38% of those interviewed shop in Denver on occasion for groceries with 82% of them stopping at Sam's Club, Cub, Price Club/Costco as being most often mentioned as the stores they shop. Considering the convenience of a City Market 7 miles away is only able to stop 1/3 of the total leakage, I do not understand how they plan to stop any additional leakage by having a store in Vail, particularly considering that the low price, unconventional stores are attracting Vail residents to Denver. Even if they were to stop all the leakage which I doubt they or anyone else could accomplish, this would give them only $149,972 per week in sales - not enough to justify a store. d City Market represented that they project weekly sales of $360,600/week. They also projected that Safeway would have sales of $96,153 per week after they opened. Considering Safeway's sales average $330,000 per week, City Market's sales comes at the expense of Safeway and other existing Vail stores. Let's review the math again compared to City Market's projections. City Market projects $360,600/week in sales. They estimate that they will take away $233,847/week from Safeway. That leaves $126,153 from converting leakage and taking sales from other stores in Vail. Assuming they convert the $50,000/week they are now doing in their Avon store to Vail, that leaves $76,153 or 76% of the leakage to Denver that they must convert, or take further sales from Safeway or other stores in Vail. to achieve their sales projection. They also stated that a new City Market and an expanded Safeway would generate $200,000 more in sales tax. That would require Safeway's having to increase its sales $96,153 more a week with an expanded store and with a new City Market. Where are these sales to come from if City Market has, as they projected, converted 85% of the leakage leaving only $23,819 for Safeway to try to convert? This leaves $72,334/week that Safeway needs to capture form somewhere to achieve City Market's sales tax projections. ~ As shown in the table below, it is impossible to achieve City Market's projections. Since the resulting total sales of all stores exceeds the market potential. Even with the projected d ~ The Honorable Peggy Osterfoss Page 3 population growth, the total market potential in 1997 is only $620,178, considerably short of the $701,725 needed to make City Market's projections work. Existing Proposed witb City Market ']['oW Mau'ket $604,972 'g'ogal Mairket ~ $604,972 ILess Sales lLess Sales . Safeway $330,000 Safeway Expanded $192,306 Other Vail Stores 125,000 Other Vail Stores 125,000 Leakage Denver 99,972 Leakage Denver 23,819 Leakage Avon 50,000 Leakage Avon -0- Toga? Sales $604,972 Balance Avail to City Market 263,847 City Market Projected Sales 360,600 Amount City 1Vlarket sales . exceeds available market potential $96,753 On the other hand, a new Safeway store combined with a non-food retailer in the old Safeway store would generate more sales tax dollars than two grocery stores. Specifically a new, larger Safeway store would be better able to compete with the City Market in Avon and converting a portion of the leakage of food dollars to the Avon City NTarket as well as encourage Avon residents to shop in Vail for food. The following table shows the additional sales tax dollars projected with a new Safeway and a non-food retailer. Additional sales/week to new Safeway Conversion leakage to Avon $25,000 Attract sales from Avon 50,000 Total Additional Weekly Sales . $75,000 Weekly Sales from IVon-Food Retailer in Safeway Store ~$139 000 Total Additional Weekly Sales 214,000 Annualized Sales . $11,128,000 Sales Tax @ 4% 445,120 *Assumes $200/s uare foot in sales which is national avera e r The Honorable Peggy Osterfoss Page 4 ' In conclusion, a new Safeway combined with a non-food retailer would generate twice the projected additional sales tax than what City Market is projecting for a new City Market and expanded Safeway. Furthermore, City Mazket projects they would do more business than Safeway, but it requires a market potential greater than presently exists. At the sales volumes they are projecting, it is unlikely both stores could survive and by their own analysis, they project Safeway with a larger store to do less volume than we are presently achieving. If City Market were allowed to proceed and it results in Safeway's closing its store, this would leave two City Markets in Eagle County as the primary grocery stores resulting in a potential monopoly for City market and exposing the community to even higher prices. I hope this analysis provides further clarification of the market potential and will help you in deterniining the best alternative to developing Vail Commons. Sincerely, 1176~ , ~ HOWARD GERELICK STORE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HG/sh cc: City Council, Vail, CO Daniel R. Guimond John King Scott Graham ~ ~ e4 T0WN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Office ofthe Town Manager Vail, Colorado 81657 . 303-479-21051 FAX 479-2157 _ MEfViORA?NDUM 70: Vail Town Council FI20Rfl: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager~ RE: 1 st Quarter Report DA7E: June 23, 1994 Please find the attached 1st Quarter Financial Report. As indicated in the report, it appears that we - will not achieve the revenue forecast for Fiscal Year 1995. Based on current estimates, we believe that the actual sales tax revenues will be $450,000 short of the budget. Sales tax revenues are divided at a ratio of 65/35 between the general fund and capital projects fund. The estimated shortfall for the general fund is estimated to be $245,000. The estimated shortfall for the capital projects fund to be $222,000. While the shortfall in revenues (as pointed out in Steve's memo) is a serious concern and may further reflect trends discussed in the budget transmittal letter last year, we believe we can deal with this shortfall without adversely affecting town operations. Most of the shortfall in the general fund will be absorbed from reduced property and liability insurance costs. Therefore, we will attempt to have a balanced budget at year end. This report also identifies a number of supplemental appropriations. Steve Thompson and Larry Grafel will be present at the meeting to discuss these appropriations and to answer any questions you may have. However, I want to discuss several major items with you in this memorandum. Golf Course Stree4 Project. This amount reflects the cost of utility work which will be conducted in . conjunction with the street project. These funds will be provided by the various utility companies. Mafterhorn S4reet Project. This appropriation also reflects the cost of utility work and will also be provided by utility companies. Seibert Circle. This project was designated as part of the Streetscape Master Plan. Project funding of $35,000 was advanced to 1995 to complete the design of this project, with work substantially complete. The $300,000 would fund the construction. The opportunity to construct this project at this time is a good one because of the construction of the Golden Peak House. We will discuss the design of these improvements, as well as the timing of this construction. We have a substantial amount of construction underway this summer and want to make sure everyone is comfortable before we proceed. This project would commence in the fall and be completed by November. East Lionshead Bus Stop. Funds were budgeted for this project in the 1995 budget. This amount has been ad'ded to incorporate some changes required by the Americans With Disabilities Act. A portion of the additional $40,000 will be transferred from the ADA account. West Vail Development Plan (Vail Commons). This is a roll forward from 1994 and covers design and selection services. \ Library Carpet. This is a roll forward from 1994. Replace Eight Buses. These funds were originally planned to be expended in FY 1996; however, because the grant will not be available until 1996, it is necessary to move this appropriation forward. There will be no difference in the cost of the buses. This is simply a matter of changing the time in which the payments are made. Replacement Vans. This appropriation reflects an increase over the original budgeted amount. The funds for this appropriation were taken from the bus purchase which, as you will recall, came in significantly under budget. This item will purchase approximately six vans which will be used for non- peak scheduling and for providing required services for the disabled. Main Vail Interchange Improvements. Funds for the Main Vail Roundabout were budgeted in 1995 budget. When the project was awarded, the funds budgeted were not sufficient to cover the cost of this project. This amount represents the additional cost of the contract for B&B, as well as reimbursements to the Town for utility work as part of the contract. West Vail Interchange Improvements. This.is a new appropriation and represents money which would be used to do the construction design of the West Vail Interchange improvements. We have done some preliminary work (conceptual geometric design). This appropriation would fund the actual construction design and contract documents which would enable the project to be constructed in 1997. Open Space/Rec Plan Trail. This amount would purchase the land from. Doug Elmore. This appropriation will fund the bike path improvements which Larry Grafel discussed with you two weeks ago. South Frontage Road Bike Path. This appropriation was authorized by the Council several weeks ago. These funds will be used to pave the bike path along the South Frontage Road and will be done in conjunction with the repaving being done by the Water District. We are providing this information for your review and will be available to answer any questions. We will be bringing the formal request for approval of these appropriations back to you in the near future. ~ . TOWN OF VAIL 1995 FIRST QUARTER FIIVANCIAL REPORT . Presented by Steve Thompson Finance Director TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road - Yail, Colorado 81657 970 479-2100 " FAX-970-479-2157 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council Town Manager Department Heads FROM: Steve Thornpson DATE: June 23, 1995 RE: First Quarter Financial Report Enclosed is the First Quarter Financial Report with estimates of revenues and expenditures as compared to budget. REVENUES Sales Tax. Sales tax collections through April are $33,000 less than last year, causing a shortfall from budget of $268,000. We needed a 3.5% increase in sales tax collections in 1995 to meet budget. I have projected a 0% increase in sales tax to show the impact of a flat year on the Town's budget. I am calling for a shortfall of $450,000, which is split 65/35 between the General Fund and the Capital Projects Fund respectively. In order to meet budget, we need $6.8 million in sales tax collections, or a 7.5% increase for the balance of the year. If sales tax increases just 3% . for the balance of this year, overall we will be short $286,000. Another concern about meeting the projected budget is that we are depending on the summer to help us out. Last summer's sales tax collections were 12.8% greater than the summer of 1993. Therefore, the summer of 1995 revenues have to be 16.7% greater than the 1993 summer revenues to make budget. Our average growth in sales tax in the summer season over the last five years has been 6.6%. LIFT TAX Lift Tax revenue for the 94-95 ski season was down 1.45% from the 93-94 season. For the 1995 calendar year through April, Lift Tax is down 1.7%, costing the Town $94,000 in revenue. If you project the 1.7% loss for the balance of the year, we will be short $130,000 which is split evenly between the General Fund and Capital Projects Fund. BIIIlLDING REVEl+l It looks as if building revenues may be the savior again. We are projecting building revenue to exceed the budget by approximately $150,000, bringing the total for building revenues to $500,000, which is about the same as what was collected in 1994. - PARKp1VG REVEIVUES If daily parking revenues collected in November and December of 1995 are the same as 1994, revenue will exceed the budget by $24,000. Daily parking revenue collected in the 94-95 ski season exceeded 93-94 collections by 3.5%. The Village structure was up 10% and the Lionshead structure was up 5%. Coupon sales between 93-94 and 94-95 were down 3%, despite a 6% increase in the.rates. Parking pass sales between 93-94 and 94-95 were down 14.5%, despite a 5% increase in pass rates. We sold 20 fewer gold passes in 94-95 ski season than in the prior season. The poor performance of these two revenues has left a shortfall of $61,000 if this trend continues through the end of the year. EXIPEIVDp We are projecting expenditures to be on budget. A supplemental appropriation of $3.4 million is required, of which $137,043 of department savings will be used. Of the required Supplemental appropriation, $1.4 million represents reimbursements to the Town for projects by other entities. This report will be presented at the June 27 Town Council Work Session. Please review before the meeting to expedite the presentation. TOWN OF VAIL . 1995 SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE UNAUDITED Percent Estimated Estimated Transfers increase Estimated of Fund Fund Balance Revenue Expenditures IN(Out) (Decrease) Fund Balance Balance to Fund Type/Fund 1994 1995 1995 1995 in Funtl Bal 1995 Revenue General Fund 3,262,453'; 14,125,876 14,539,689 38,653 (375,160)Y 2,8$7,293' 20% Special Revenue Funds: ; Capital Projects Fund 5506,583', 7,579,223 11,607,894 (1,097,711) (5,126,382) 380;60t. 5% Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 1,667 0t7 2,037,825 2,564,293 (155,000) (681,468) : 985~549;; 48% Police Confiscation Fund ; 429,838,: 41,200 101,464 (60,264) ' 69;574' Vail Marketing Fund 18,290; 838,500 856,790 (18,290} ~ Vail Housing Fund 85t,008:; 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 881;d08; m Bond Proceeds Construction' Fund - 35;012; 0 74,632 (74,632) (39 620) Internal Service Funds: Heavy Equipment Fund : 337,437; 1,619,051 1,738,524 (119,473} 13% Facility Maintenance Fund i82,073;s 1,641,254 1,663,146 (21,892) ; t60„~8t; 10% Health Insurance Fund 725793~ 1,042,026 1,054,405 (12,379) 713414 68% Enterprise Fund• Parking Structure Enterprise Fund ? 21 61Oi 1,945,816 1,667,223 (284,593) 15 6t0" 1% Debt Service Funds: Town of Vail Debt Service Fund >1 852 962; 160,110 2,979,903 1,468,651 (1,351,142) ` 501;820' Booth Creek Debt Service Fund 55,549 68,000 , (12,451) ' 2,636 5% Total 14605;561 31,116,430 38,945,963 0 (7,829,533) ~:-6776';U30' 1 GITRFINS. W K4 PAGE 06/23/95 _ A 995 Sl' ,QUATER FINANCIAi. REP-RT . . . : . . iJNAUDITED . M1` 1995 ; 1995" , 1995 . UAR ANCE ; : , C3RIGiNAL 4 ~1MEld[1ED ESTlMATE :OVERI(UNDER)`. GiEINE„R,AVI~UND.HEdEP(IJE... . . ':..BUDBUD.C~T Taxes Property & Ownership Taxes 1,777,710 1,777,710 _ 1,777,710 0 Retail Sales Tax 8,685,854 8,685,854 8,400,000 (285,854 Ski lift Tax 1,045,000 1,045,000 980,000 (65,000 Franchise Fees 570,440 570,440 538,700 (31,740 Penalt & Interest 37,000 37,000 37,000 0 Subtotal Taxes - 12,116,004 12,116,004 11,733,410 (382,594 Construction Fees 349,966 349,966 500,000 150,034 Licenses & Permits 52,960 52,960 54,800 1,840 Charges for Services 243,941 243,941 243,029 (912 Intergovernmental revenue 1,038,545 1,038,545 1,058,845 20,300 Fines & Forfeitures 261,575 261,575 253,075 (8,500 Transfer from Parking Structure Fund 105,348 105,348 79,736 (25,612 Other 282,217 282,217 282,717 500 TOTAL GF REVENUE 14,450,556 14,450,556 14,205,612 244,944 ; ! ~ 995 - 199~ > .1995 VARIANCE _ . L7RIGINAL - AMENDEQ ESTIMATE OUERf(UNDER) ; .OIENERAL FBJNp EXPENSE~ , . ; B,UDGET. Town Officials 779,598 809,046 809,046 0 Administrative Services 1,321,208 1,329,248 1,329,248 0 Community Development 997,640 1,062,751 1,062,751 0 Police 3,219,122 3,219,122 3,219,122 0 Fire 1,188,203. 1,188,203 1,188,203 0 Public Works . 2,121,025 2,128,814 2,128,814 0 Transit 2,172,745 2,187,085 2,187,085 0 Library 577,372 582,860 582,860 0 Building Maintenance 831,508 831,508 831,508 0 Insurance 344,489 344,489 344,489 0 Contributions & Events 885,737 885,737 885,737 0. Em lo ee Benefits 11,909 11,909 11,909 0 TOTAL GF EXPEIVDITURES 14,450,556 14,580,772 14,580,772 0 SURPLUS/ SHORTFALL 0 130,216 375,160 1QTRFIN5.WK4 PAGE 2 06/22/95 ; ` 1995 1995 VARIANGE l . - ' . ; ORI(31NAL RMENDED `:ESTIMATE OVEW(UNDER)>. CAPIT~?t;:PROJECTS;REVENUE ~ BUQGET. ;6i1DGET,.. _ , . Retail Sales Tax 4,764,548 4,764,548 4,607,000 (157,548) County Sales Tax 210,000 210,000 210,000 0 Ski Lift Tax 1,045,000 1,045,000 _ 980,000 (65,000) Reimb for Projects 500,000 500,000 Earnings on Investments . 124,000 124,000 124,000 0 Other Co. Reimbursements 419,900 419,900 CDOT Grants 200,000 200,000 RETT Project Reimbursement 155,000 155,000 Miscellaneous 3,203 3,203 Transfer from Parking Fund for Capital 204,857 204,857 204,857 0 Transferfrom GF 11,083 11,083 RETT Loan Repa ment 535,120 535,120 535;120 0 TOTAL REVENUE 6,883,525 6,883,525 7,950,163 1,066,638 10TRFIN5.WK4 PAGE 3 06/22/95 L , ~ ' 1895 - 1995 - 1995 . <VARIANCE ` ; - .0R,IGiNAL AMENDED ESTInIIATE C3VER/(UNOER Project Management 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 Golf Course Street Reconstruction 1,500,000 1,706,500 1,706,500 0 Matterhorn Street Reconstruction 900,000 1,156,100 _ 1,156,100 0 Capital Street Maintenance 570,000 455,000 455,000 0 Ice Arena Pedestrian Chute 65,000 65,000 65,000 0 Siebert Circle 0 300,000 300,000 0 Street Light Improvement Program 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Pulis Bridge Construction 120,000 145,000 145,000 0 Chapel Bridge Restoration 40,000 150,000 150,000 0 Covered Bridge Restoration 173,000 228,000 228,000 0 Town Shop Improvements 675,000 675,000 675,000 0 Parking Structure Capital Maintenance 204,857 204,857 204,857 0 Bus Shelter Replacement Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 Emergency Building Maintenance 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Drainage Improvements 144,000 124,000 124,000 0 East Lionshead Bus Stop 60,000 100,000 100,000 0 Install New Bus Shelters 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 Diesel Exhaust System Station I& II 22,513 22,513 22,513 0 Irrigation and Fountain BackFlow 19,528 26,838 26,838 0 Police Department Space Expansion 0 456 456 0 West Vail Development Plan 0 123,532 123,532 0 Land Use Plan 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Lionshead Master Plan and Design 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 SDD Consulting VVork 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 Electric Raceway & Carpet @ Library 0 35,000 35,000 0 Comm Sys Maint. & Replace 0 3,857 3,857 0 Replace Mobile Fire Radios 0 2,119 2,119 0 Replace Eight Buses 1,286,000 2,042,040 2,042,040 0 Town of Vail Bus Grant Lobbyist 0 8,629 8,629 0 Back Flow Prevention Device 0 3,185 3,185 0 Under Grounding Utilities 25,000 25,000 0 News Paper Dispensers 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 Bald Mountain Underpass 87,194 105,000 105,000 0 Additional and Replacement Vans 230,000 336,514 336,514 0 Alarm Monitor Unit 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 Replace Carpet in Muni Building 25,000 25,000. 25,000 0 Street Furniture Replacement 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 Expansion Heavy Equip Vehicles 122,300 122,300 122,300 0 Second Radio Channel 0 4,254 4,254 0 Automate East Vail Interchange 9,900 9,900 9,900 0 Main Vail Interchange Improvements 2,000,000 2,602,300 2,602,300 0. West Vail Interchange Improvements 100,000 100,000 0 Solar Side Walk @ Blue Cow Chute 30,000 30,000 0 ADA Improvements 50,000 30,000 30,000 0 Transfer to Debt Service 1,468,651 1,468,651 1,468,651 0 TOTAL EXPEiVDITURES 10,412,943 13,076,545 13,076,545 0 SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL (3,529,418 6,193,020) (5,126,382) 1QTRFIIV5.INK4 PAGE 4 06/23/95 J , 1995 u 1995 ' 1995 VARIANCE CaRIGINAL , M AME~V~ED ESTIMATE ;~UER!(UNDER} > RE~l~ ESTA?E TRANSFER TAX BUt~"~ET. ; . ` REVENUE RETT Taxes 1,700,000 1,700,000 _ 1,700,000 0 Golf Course Lease/VRD 90,300 90,300 90,300 0 Recreation Amenities Fees 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 CDOT Grant 145,000 145;000 Lottery Revenue 14,025 14,025 14,025 0 Earnin s on Investments 58,500 58,500 58,500 0 TOTAL REVENUE 1,892,825 1,892,825 2,037,825 145,000 EXPENDITURES . Debt Service on Golf Course 340,432 340,432 340,432 0 Loan Repayment 535,120 535,120 535,120 0 Miscellaneous 0 500 500 0 - Projects: • Playground Safety Improvements 75,000 85,000 85,000 0 Back Flow Prevention 15,000 18;900 18,900 0 Irrigation Control 60,000 101,000 101,000 0 Gore Cr Promenade Stairs 0 25,000 25,000 0 Vail Trail Safety 2,200 2,200 2,200 0 West Vail Bike Path 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 Dowd Junction Bike Path Design 0 0 0 0 Ford Park Bike Path Design 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 Park Maintenance 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 Rec Path Maintenance 120,000 112,500 120,000 (7,500) Dowd Junction Land Improvement 8,500 8,500 8,500 0 Pirate Ship Park 41,000 0 0 0 Covered Bridge Pocket Park 11,500 11,500 11,500 0 Mill Creek/ Ted Kindel Park 0 11,141 11,141 0 Vail Das Schone Bike Path 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 Master Open Space/ Rec Trail Plan 150,000 400,000 400,000 0 North/South Trail 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 S. Frontage Road Path 175,000 492,500 485,000 7,500 Sunburst Shoulder 135,000 135,000 135,000 0 Ford Park Master Plan 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 TOTAL RETT EXPENDITURES 2,108,752 2,719,293 2,719,293 0 SURPLUS/ SHORTFALL 215,927 826,468 681,468 1QTRFIN5.WK4 PAGE 5 06/22/95 a . 1995 ~`I 995 VARIANCE : • : ORIGINAL . AMtNDE~ ESTiM}iTE :OUER/(UNDER EQUIPMEN'T =lliVn . . . BUDGET..;;:. . BU~GET . . . : . ~ . : . REVEIVUE 1,619,051 1,619,051 1,619,051 0 EXPEfVDITURES 1,729,976 1,738,524 1,738,524 0 SURPLUS/ SHORTFALL (110,925 119,473 119,473 ' 199, * 1995 1995 VARiANCE PkRKtNQ STRUCT'UR~ ~~lIV~ ; QRIGINAL, AMENDED ESTIMATE 01/ER/(UNDER} ; - • fi . ; . ' BUD~ET : ,BU~~ET . . REVENUE Daily Parlcing Revenue 1,401,500 1,401,500 1,436,000 34,500 Passes & Coupons 407,875 407,875 347,000 (60,875) Lease Revenue 86,916 86,916 84,816 (2,100 Parking Assessments 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 Miscellaneous 3,000 3,000 TOTAL REVEIVUE 1,971,291 1,971,291 1,945,816 25,475 EXPENDITURES Operations & Capital 1,334,206 1,340,343 1,340,343 0 Debt Service 531,737 531,737 531,737 0 Transfer to General Fund 105,348 105,348 79,736 (25,612 0 TOTAL EXPEiVDITURES 1,971,291 1,977,428 1,951,816 25,612 SURPLUS/ SHORTFALL 0 6,137 6,000 1995 1995 1995 UARIANCE ~RIGINAL ; AfvIEN~ED ESTIMATE UVERI(UNDERj: P't"1LICE COIVF .ISC~_,'TIN FUND BUD:GET ~:B:Ui7GE;T . • ; REVEiVUE Confiscation Proceeds 10,000 10,000 37,500 27,500 Earnings on Investments 3,700 3,700 3,700 0 TOTAL PCF REVENUE 13,700 13,700 41,200 27,500 EXPENDITURES 101,464 101,464 101,464 0 TOTAL PCF EXPENDITURES 101,464 101,464 101,464 0 SURPLUS/ SHORTFALL 87,764 87,764 60,264 1 QTRFIIV5.VVK4 PAGE 6 06/22/95. TOWN OF VAIL SCHEDULE OF REQUIRED 1995 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ADDITIONAL DEPT PROJECT 1995 SAVINGS No. EXPENDITURE OR PROJECT EXPENDITURES USED GENERALFUND: Town OHicials: Town Manager Compensation 11,340 Free Parking 4,025 Town Manager Appreciation Lunch 3,000 3,000 Carpet Muni Building 8,240 TM Contribution to Library Carpet 2,843 2,843 29,448 5,843 Adminisirative Services: Town Clerk Remodel and Computer 8,040 8,040 8,040 8,040 Community Development: Professional Fees \ Code Revisions 13,414 13,414 ' - Professional Fees \ Village Views 13,873 13,873 Professional Fees \ Water Quality 10,288 10,288 Art Repair and Maint 11,877 11,877 Art in Public Places Project 6,117 6,117 Building Permit Software Development 9,542 9,542 65,111 65,111 Public Works: Unifortns 4,642 4,642 Software Upgrade PMS 1,000 1,000 NNCR for PW Office 600 600 Office Fumiture 1,547 1,547 7,789 7,789 Trensportation Uniforms 9,790 9,790 CDL Cones 800 800 Radio - Bus Washer 750 750 Printer for schedules 1,500 1,500 Bus Wash Janitonal 1,500 1,500 14,340 14,340 • Llbrary Error in Retirement Contribulion 2,645 Library Carpel 2,843 2,843 , 5,488 2,843 SUBTOTAL: GENERAL FUND 130,216 103,966 10TRFIN5.WK4 PAGE 7 06/22/95 / A ADDITIONAL DEPT PROJECT 1995 SAVINGS No. EXPENDITURE OR PROJECT EXPENDITURES USED CdPITAL PROJEC7S FUWD: 114 Golf Course Sireet Reconstruction 206,500 115 Matterhom Street Reconstruction 256,100 153 Siebert Circle . 300,000 405 Pulis Bridge Construction 25,000 408 Chapel Bridge Restoration 10,000 410 Covered Bridge Restoration 20,000 556 East Lionshead Bus Stop 20,000 559 Irrigation and Fountain BackFlow 7,310 706 Police Department Space Expansion 456 708 West Vail Development Plan 123,532 902 Eleciric Raceway & Carpet @ Library 35,000 904 Comm Sys Maint. 8 Replace 3,857 906 Replace Mobile Fire Radios 2,119 912 Replace Eight Buses 756,040 913 Town of Vail Bus Grani Lobbyist 8,629 915 Back Flow Prevention Device 3,185 917 Under Grounding Utilities 25,000 933 Bald Mountain Underpass 17,806 940 Additional and Replacement Vans 106,514 987 Second Radio Channei 4,254 Solar Side Walk @ Blue Cow Chute 30,000 990 Main Vail Interchange Improvements . 602,300 992 West Vail Interchange Improvemenis 100,000 2,663,602 REdL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND Miscellaneous 500 9,020 Playground Safety Improvements 10,000 9,021 Back Flow Prevention 3,900 9,022 imgation Control 41,000 9,023 Gore Cr Promenade Stairs 25,000 9,087 Pirate Ship Park (41,000) 9,090 Mill Creek / Ted Kindel Park 11,141 9,094 Master Open Space/ Rec Trail Plan 250,000 9,096 S. Frontage Road Path 310,000 610,041 PAR6CIPdG STRUCTURE FURID: Uniforms 2,333 2,333 Radio Base Station 1,304 1,304 ' Copier 2,500 2,500 6,137 6,137 . HEAVY EQUIPAAERIT FUR1D: Uniforms 1,388 1,388 Misc Small Tools 2,060 2,060 Misc Capital Toois 5,100 5,100 8,548 8,548 FACILIYIES AAAIRIYERIANCE Uniforms 2,892 2,892 Muni Building Carpet 3,500 0 Facility Replacement Forecast 2,000 2,000 Carpet Parking Office 500 500 Dust Collection system Upgrade 10,000 10,000 Programmable Sign / Clock for Terminal Building 3,000 3,000 21,892 18,392 GRARID TOTAL 3,440436 137,043 1QTFiFIN5.WK4 PAGE 8 06/23/95 . SCHEDIDLE OF DEPARTMEPVT SAVINGS Savings Savings Savings Balance Used Balance . 12/31 /94 1995 _ 3/31 /95 Generai Fund: Muni Court 11,298 11,298 Town Manager 50,312 5,843 44,469 Town Attorney 19,102 19,102 Finance 82,714 82,714 Data Processing 7,640 7,640 Personnel 26,754 26,754 Town Clerk 13,567 8,040 5,527 Office Support 6,135 6,135 Insurance and Safety 16,400 16,400 Community Development 129,961 65,111 64,850 Police 131,074 131,074 Fire 10,225 10,225 Public Works,Transportation Fleet, Faciliry and Parking 398,075 55,206 342,869 Library 14,596 2,843 11,753 Total 917,853 137,043 780,810 1 QTRFIN5.WK4 PAGE 9 06/22/95 S,G.GE. \ o. oo a ~ f YB) \ uQ yP ~ 6 Y~ ~ v6 ? InOicaras chanpo in tloor aleration N. i-• y ~ a ~ J. J• ,LO9 (trO.) Sao buil0inp ooclions . STAIR , `Q UNIT 19 ~ J. LIno of loer G.C.E. v Y• oDOw. ; \ /i u. O. v0 N ~ STA1 R p v G.C.E_ bj 69 'C. ~6• UNIT 6 L J q p ~6 y ~ \ 24 Do.+n to unit 9 P Za / ~ 'L v v ~`9 0I. 'm. O '.o. 'm• Z'e a- \ . / AJ _~p, \ / / Ap O UNIT 18 g. UN17 17 ~ 0 9c+ fi v. 9 ~ PLAZA ~V~ c G.GE. UNIT 3 F 'r,o D"r. ' ` - Y y. • ~ InCltatoo poundmr Dulvoon ~y6 Q 2 .}6 PotW(LGE Unlf9) onE aYO. uQ a• ~G.C.E STAiR 4C.E Wnxo(TyP) ~ ABOYE ~ N / a q 'm. UNIT 16 PAT10 LC.E. UNIT S } N D 2'•~p ~ YxT~I`i ~~r. . m• ¢~N10VE ~JCIG'~ ~11LINo \ BAr NnN00 STEPS G.C.E. UNIT 9 ' Sea 9atlon KK _ PLAZA a° f; 'u;¢:• \ _ f V;i'• c~u . ~ -.3`•: . E G.C.E. w< :rttic A~:;- RAI*ED p~~'~Ies k~ (11 ° WqLL 14" WAi.L . GJTOtJE WALL ENGI.GYi~1~E~ `24~ WAL~ "24" µ/ALL i0 ~1tG~ ~X1GJ(~6 \ ~ `~YIZ I1AND~zqIL "(o F'I~rG1~ EXI~T~ • ~8„=, ~ PLANNING APdD ENVIROtJIIAENTAL CONAnAISSION June 26, 1995 AGENDA Siqe !/isi4s 10:30 p.en. West Vaii Mall 1390 Greenhill Court Cascade Crossing Medical Center, Catheter Lab Daily Grind Drivers: Andy & Randy ProjecY Orientation Lunch 12:30 p.rne Discussion of appropriate materials, colors and advertising for outdoor dining/public seating areas. Public Hearina 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a worksession for a conditional use permit to allow the Vail Valley Medical Center to park a mobile catheter lab/trailer at the Nleadow Drive loading area, located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E& F, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Dan Feeney Planner: Randy Stouder 2. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a liquor store to be located at the Cascade Crossing Retail Center, 1031 S. Frontage Road West /an unplatted parcel located west of the Vail Professional Building and south of I-70. Applicant: Andrew Woods, DBA Local's Liquor Planner: Mike Mollica 3. A request for a setback variance to allow for an addition to a residence, located at 1390 Greenhill CourULot 12, Glen Lyon. Applicant: Summit Vacation Properties Planner: Andy Knudtsen 4. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for exterior seating at the West Vail Mall, located at 2151 fVorth Frontage Road/Lot 2A, Vail Das Schone 3rd Fiting. Applicant: Vllest Vail Mall Corporation Planner: Randy Stouder 5. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining deck at the Daily Grind Coffee Company, located at 288 Bridge StreeULot B, Block 5H, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: The Daily Grind Coffee Company Planner: George Ruther ~ 6. Approval of June 12, 1995 minutes. F:\everyone\pec\agenda\062695 6 DESBGN REVIEW BOARD AGEIVDA Wednesday, June 21, 9995 2:00 P.M. PROJECT ORIER~TA~~ON 11:00 AM S9TE VBSSTS 12.30 PM 1. Lot 10, - 1722 Geneva Drive 2. Sadler - 9950 Chamonix Lane 3. Smith - 1473 Aspen Grove Lane 4. Gooden/Fallier - 1873 Lionsridge Loop 5. CB Smith - 1179 Spraddle Creek Rd. 6. iVioran - 3797 East Lupine Drive 7. Garton's - 143 East Meadow Drive 8. VVestStar - 263 East Gore Creek Drive 9. Seibert Circle - Intersection of Hanson Ranch Rd./Bridge St. Drivers: Randy & George Brent Alm suvorn in as neuu Design Revieuu Board member. 1. Ganter - Addition of hot tub in setback area. JC 2427 Chamonix Lane/Lot 22, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing #1. Applicant: Judy Ganter MOTION: Borne SECOND: Moffet VOTE: 5-0 CONSENTAPPRO!!ED 2. WestStar - fVew ATM in Village GR 263 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot E, Block 5, Vail Village 1 st Filing Applicant: NVestStar Bank, Beth Golde MOTIOiV: Borne SECOfVD: Moffet VOTE: 5-0 COPBSENT APPROV[~D W/CONDIIT@OPlS 3. Lot 10 - Conceptual review of site plan only GR 1722 Geneva Drive/Lot 10 Matterhorn Village Applicant: Rick Rosen MOTION: SECOfVD: VOTE: ~~~~EPTUAL - NO VOTE . 4. Seibert Circle Redevelopment - Conceptual review mm Located at the intersection of Hanson Ranch Road and Bridge Street Applicant: Tovun of VailNVinston arld Assoc. MOTION: SECOiVD: VOTE: ~ON~EPTMAL REl~~EW - NO !!OTE 5. Hackman - Review of a new single family residence LW ; 2801 Snowberry Drive/Lot 9, Block 9, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Patricia and David Hackman MOTION: Borne SECOND: Moffet VOTE: 5-0 CONSENT APPROVED 6. O'Neill - New Primary/Secondary Residence. LW 1385 Westhaven Drive/Lot 51, Glen Lyon Subdivision: Applicant: Patricia O'Neill MOTION: Borne -SECOND: Moffet VOTE : 5-0 ' APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS 7. Sadler - New primary/secondary residence. GR 1950 Chamonix Lane/Lot 34, Buffer Creek Subdivision. Applicant: June Sadler . MOTION: Borne SECOND:Moffet VOTE: 5-0 T14BLED UNTIL JULY 5TH, 1995 8. Smith - Garage expansion and two-story addition. LW 1473 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 5, Block 2, Lionsridge Subdivision,Filing #4. Applicant: Snowden Smith MOTION: Borne SECOND: Moffet VOTE: 5-0 CONSENT APPROVED 9. Reunion Units/C.B. Smith - New Single Family residence LW 1179 Spraddle Creek Rd./ Lot 7, Spraddle Creek Applicant: Reunion Units MOTION: Moffet SECOND: Alm VOTE: 3-0-2 (Woldrich out of the room and Arnett left early) APPROVED W/CONDITIONS 10. Garton's Saloon - Sign variance RS 143 East Meadow Drive/Crossroads East, Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st Filing Applicant: Dave Garton MOTION: Borne SECOND:Moffet VOTE: 4-0-1 (Arnett absent) CONSENT RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL 11. Riva Ridge North - Change to approved plans. LW 133 Gore Creek Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Riva Ridge North Condominium Association MOTION: Borne SECOND: Moffet VOTE: 5-0 CONSENT APPROVED 2 ,a 12. The Lodge at Vail - Construction of the International V1/ing AK A 174 E. Gore Creek Drive/a part of Block C, Vail Village 1 st Filing Applicant: The Lodge at Vail MOTIOiV: SECOfVD: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL- NO VOTE 13. Moran Residence - Concepiual review of a Demo/Rebuild of Single Family Residence. RS 3797 East Lupine Drive/Lot 4, Bighorn 2nd Addition Applicant: Chloe Moran MOTIOIV: SECOIVD: VOTE: COf19~~PTUAL - Ng VOTE 14. Gooden/Fallier - Conceptual review of a new duplex. , RS 1873 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 2, Block 3, Lionsridge Filing 3 Applicant: Don Gooden MOTION: SECOIVD: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL - NO !lOTE 15. Bannister - Remodel and addition of a garage JC 2943 Bellflower/Lot 4, Block 6, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Frank Bannister Te4BLED UNT9L J~LY 5, 1995 16. Houtsma - Garage addition and foyer GR 1868 West Gore Creek Drive Applicant: John and Bobbi Houtsma • TA~~~D UNT8~ AUGUST 2, 1995 NiENiBERS PRESEiVT MEMBERS ABSENT Mike Arnett Bob Borne Brent Alm Hans VVoldrich Greg Moffet Staff Approvals Sterling - Slider door addition RS 680 Lionshead Place, Unit 107/Antlers at Vail Condominiums Applicant: Jill Sterling 0'Rourlce - 250 GRFA Application for interior addition GR 1259 VVesthaven Circle/Lot 35 Glen Lyon - Applicant: Gerald O'Rourke FAeveryone\dtb\agendasW62195 3 c, Glazov - Landscaping LW 454 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village 3rd Applicant: Burton Glazov Ast/Kleimer - Repaint GR 5194 Main Gore Drive/Lot 16, Vail Meadows Applicant: Larry Ast Timberfalls Condo - Window addition LW 1204 Timberfalls Condos/Timberfalls Applicant: Charlie Flowers . Tyrolean Inn - Awning Addition LW 400 E. Meadow Drive Applicant: Pepi Langegger MarmoYs Tale - New Sign . LW 141 E. Meadow Drive Crossroads Applicant: Steve Dowswell Tondre Residence - Roof material change JC 1374 Sandstone Dr. Applicant: . Brice Tondre Indian Creek/Ferman - Fireplace removal JC 1139 Sandstone Drive Applicant: Michael Lauterbach Manor Vail - Landscaping RS 595 E. Vail Valley Drive Applicant: Ric Peterson Wimer - Addition GR 2860 Aspen Lane Applicant: ' Frank Wimer Clark, Cogswell,.Wilson - Garage addition GR 792/794 Potato Patch Applicant: David Thornsberry . Ryerson - Addition AK 4859 Meadow Drive/ Lot 16, Block 5, Bighorn Sub. Applicant: Tony and Cindy Ryerson . , FAeveryone\ft\agendas\062195 4 . MEMORANDUM Toe Town Council Froma Community Development Department Datee June 23, 1995 Subject: Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment Just a reminder that the second joint TC/PEC worksession to discuss the proposed Golden Peak.Ski Base redevelopment has been scheduled for Monday July 10, 1995. The public meeting will begin at 2:00 , PM. Vail Associates has requested this worksession to respond more thoroughly to the questions and issues that were discussed at the first worksession; held on June 12, 1995. We expect to receive from V.A. a written response to the comments made on June 12 and staff will prepare an appropriate memo for your review prior to the July 10, 1995 meeting. ` SINT BY:FAGLE COUM'Y ; 6-20-95 ~ 14:13 ~ 3033287207- 3434792157;# 1/ 4 - June 20, 190 - 94:24 UK;Lf l:( ri!N f Y HUILDIN( ; (lffl(:CUf UII '1(91 R!)AI.IWAY r.c~. lu )AkU of c:tMautitit)NERS tu)x xs,i : GU~I I, t'cNCN:iUX) ~it6'u I'IpJI ~2tl-If(dl.'i ' : fAX: (.IU:f) JZi{-71t1/ ~ •`a`j ;~1'i.~ _EAG~~ ~~~OR/ ODO . . AGENDA Buo"ARP" ~ `UNTY MOMM'~~~~~~~~ ~ ~EETING DAY c~J4.DNE 269 1995 , o A o 0 0 0 0 o a,a a o a o o c a a o 0 0 0 0 o a p a o o a o 0 0 o a a y p • 9a00 - 9010 WORK SESSIOA9 - 1NE€BCLY UP~ATE Jadb D. Lswis, County AAataager 10e30 - 19 ~REAK 19:00 - 92e00 WORK SESSION - PENDifYG 5..MGATI 0N Jarnes R. Ffte, Coun4b Att4orptey 12M - 1:2@ LUNCH 9:30 - 2a30 . WORK SlESSGON - NIEF-TING~ ATrENbE~ 2:30 - $:4@ PD-293-9SdF9-CQR01LLERA PlfASE 11 IBEARCAr FILBnIG 13 Ka4hy rzasttey, PIanning Technidan, Cmmmuroity Development " ACTDON: To consider a requesQ 9o nsubdivido Tracts A& 5 to create gour 4mc4s oi Opera Space, 14 single farrtdy lois and related Poadway and easeenenM . 2-*40 - 2A5 CONSENT CALENDAR it=a.eA n+Bugm o~ Ron-comw-votm naGao om PEvew ew ft cowam rsyar eo aftw ft Baem of cCUa* cmmkdomgs b qAnd Is fto mte ORNM sn tteoro trnpoaOrEa4 ftwcna bagmp GrQfb, qpq ~7 ~y~ tl~e ~e BaRa aD °~lAOYEDP Phero Aaq rv~~ c? 6b ~a W860a~at =Mv3krV4 mosidwod wperab*. ~D °~EQl1~T° aP~ ~an tr:°REk~01/~D' Pre~ tP~ C~oNq ~i 1. s81 PAYBRlG . Landa Pankuch, Accoun4ing RAaek Silvoethom, Controller ACTBOR9: Approeal subject Yo review by 8he County Manaqer. SENI' BY: EAGLE COUYI'Y ; 6-20-95 ; 14:13 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 2/ 42. CENTEtAL COPIER PURCHASE Martc Silverthom, ConVoller ACTION: Consider approval. 2:45 - 8:00 A. RESOU1T10N SUSPENDING BEAVER CREEK FOOD SERVICE8, INIC d6a BROKEN ARROW CAFE'S UQUOR UCENSE Robert LoetHer, Assistant County Attomey ACT10N: Consider appPOVal: B. RESOI,.t1TI6N3USPENDING MID-VAOLRESTAURANTSLIQUOR UCENSE Robert Loeftier, Assistant County Attomey ACTION: Consider approval. , C. RESOLUYION DRAWING ON LETTER OF CREDIT FOR BOLES CUSTOMS BUtLDERS, INC. Jim Fritze, County Attomey ACTION: Consider approval. " D. FINAL PI.AT, BEAR tiULCH FILING ONE AND TWO Kathy Eastley, Communlty Develapment ACTIOIV: Consader approval. E. PARTIAL RELEASE OF COLLATERAL AND COMMENCEMENT OF THE vUARRANTY PERIOD FQR gHE EASY WEST IN7ER- CONNECT WATER MAtN John Althoff, Engineering . ACTION: Consider approval. 3:00 - 3:15 gREqK 3:15 - 5:00 ZS-357-94THIRTY MILE PIT ' Sid Fox, planning, Communify Development ACTION: To consider a request for gravel. extraction and processinp, asphalt and c:oncrete produciion. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE EAOLE COUMTY CpMMIS810NER8 WILL 6E hIHLD ON JUPE 27, 1886 ALL MEETIN081MLL BE HELD IP1 THE EAOLE COUNTY BuILqNG • 600 BROAOWAT, EAGIE- OR OTHERVNBE NpTED. 7HS AGENOA 18 PROVIpED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE9 ONLY - ALL Y1h1ES ARE APPROXIYATE. TFIE BOARD WFtlIE IN SESStON MAY CON91DQt OTWEq ITEMS THAT ARE BROIJGMT BEFORE IT. SEFPI' BY:EAGLE COUlVfY ; 6-20-95 14: 13 : 3033287207- 3034792157;# 3/ 4 , . - - . Jtane 20, 1995 - 9 4:25 ~a FAC:I.f (I N.IN IY IiUll I)INf ~ r orrui oi. iiif Sfqt BRO?IriyAY • ISC1AN11(J1 C!)MMI551(7N1Ati 'Y.. N.c).H!)XM"U (.N):p 17H Hfd15 ! AGI F, ('!)I.( ktAllf ) 81(.11 FAX: f:u1'11 'f±8•/1!)7 =:~~~s T• ..e',!'' . ~ • `q /•'''y/ A~~~ ~OUNl I COLoRADO . AGENDA BOARij vF COuNTY "OnnMIssraN~~~ ~EETING DAY JUNE 279 1995 0 ooit4o ooQOBlaoooooooo4floooadi?oaaooA~do 9:30 WORIC SESSIQN - REGARD1NG INFORMATIOIV SYSTEIVIS SEfZVICE POLlCV AND PRAC71CE , a4lien Sartin, Fin~nce ~ 90:30 WORK SESSION - REGARDlNG TV IN EJe1GLE COUNTY Wayne Randal 992~ ABATEIUDE6~T HEAPJNGS , d. Kuul E. and DIane F. Voge1man . Schedule number R031536 H. Caaig S. Sirnon Schedule number M018995 880. CharBes V. Mcadarn IB@ Ss;hedu6e number R039984 B@f_ Ruben & Estrella Romero Schedule nurnbor R000990 V. EdwaPd F. CollAns SCttedule number R009648 W Chais Adams Schedule number 030549 VPI. . SQepPuen I. Ka4z Schedule number 096E28 !lIPI. Sulgroup Properties, Limited ParQnership Scnedule number 014726 SEIYI' BY : EAG[E C011N'fY ; 6-20-95 ~ 14 :14 ; 3033287207- 3434792157 4/ 4; . . IX. Elizabeth Webster . Schedule number 009110 . X. Hundred Acre V11ood, Inc. Schedule number P021857 . Xl. D'Coffee Beanery Sc.hedule number P022481 XII. Moffat Coel Company by US West Comm. Inc. Go Consultus . , SChedule number 000715 AIlen Btadc, Assessor 11CTION: Consider approval. 11:30 -11:4b 1. T-27.95-BROWN RESIpENCE 2. T Z8-95 BARTI..ETT RESIDENCE 8ruce CampbeA, Community Development ACTION: Consider approval.. 11a45 - 12:00 JAIL. IPISPECTION Eegle Courtly Juaffce Center 12:00 - 1:30 LUNCH 7:30 - 5:00 SERVICE PIAN FQR HORSE MQUNTAIN RANCN METROPOUTAN DISTRICT (tabled from 414195, 4125194) 6Ceith Montag, Community Development ACTION: Consider approval. TFIE NEXT NEE11F1[i OF THE EAGLE CoU?rTY Cp1W3gpNERS 1MLL BE NELD ON JUI,r 10, 1995 All MEETINGS 4NLL BE HELD IN 7HE EAGLE COUN7Y 8UI1DlNp . 600 gRp,qqvyqY. EAGLE _ pR pRy{ER{MSE NOTED. THlS ACaEMA LS PftOVlDED FOR IWaORiAllT10NAL PURP06ES ONLY - AL.L 71h1ES ML' APPROJDUATE. . TME BQARD WHILE IN SEssION MAY CON5IDER 07MER fTEMS TNATARE eqOUGHT BEFaRE IT. JUN 21 '95 09:47 VAIL SKI RENTALS . p,z Imia. afl, 1995. . , . . ~ . . Assocfatan vvm~) 6et yes~r,rdaya ~aa~ ' a?a' ed to pasa ~o~ ~a t~ ~ie~~ts ~e concer~d ~bout and some suggestio~s. ~I~ t~aey . . . . ~ . ~ ..o ~ Way Stop/ROUDdda-~ut ~e ARercchae~rs do s~B ~at, it clased 4t al~ eveu Chough almmadve rnute3 aae . : ~ . ~ . ~provided. S&tha feedbeck wa quite sftoug on thfe ieeiie: 4on°t close the fonr-way at 4 -for tngr length mf per3od. _ . _ . - , : ' Perhape-a traffic control gmon'should be'placed directly In. the aniddle of the four• ~ '.way to direct tmfflc, aud keep:it cantinuat often t{ma, FcoPle ane still stappin~ ` even ~y doa~°t nead. to.: traf#'ic co~olp~o n (sirnilar w the T'ovi+m ~o~,ce ' aunng ft winter) woWii keep tcaffi°c contmo ,s and ytaick. ~ . . . . . : ~ `Anothee tmft cmtroI pemn ae te W_ V9Y e-idt Cdmflw aftaation to ahove). ~ , . . . . , : . ~ . , 7 o ~ . Vi~ Bahn . . . :'TEe MercbaYats also f~ vory stroagly aboiat this issue. They.waYae the Vista Bahn ~ . Open as, gnuch as.possWe throughout the summer, but in alizin canstraints, khey . alizig . ~ ~t?ill settle wi~. it duflySth closWg. Y exp ' ta the Merchants the ftm rea~ons ' . . ~ ~t as cloain ea o : p I . . g (Nfld°VWI ConBh't1Cti0ri, OWen PCAk CAIIBh11Cf10n, allld : . , . : : . :mamtenance) bu¢ dmy, ell felt Hke Vail Associates could afPond -to keep itopen for ~ • ..1.Q dAys oY .90. Simply put: we all reIy on tl;e .Yista Bahn during the . , . _ • ; 'aat~snef to pult toudO in. Withvut it, aud with all the conetrucaan, we are Zoolting : ; . . ~ ~ . ;.!at slow autnmercommg otat of a slow vWntrr. All the Merdazit°s agree tliat is not n . . . . peuX Pacwm to flook ag! . i . i . . . ~ Sime dW-Mercbat Amciation v~s fOrmed to s;r-ane lim of conimuwiiCCatim between ~ MageMet+ch$nb and the Tovs+n of Vail, Vai1 A,s4ociatcs, VVTCB,° eec., I wanted to get ehis feedbe6k to you as soon a,a go8eible. Please cA1Y me dia~ectly at 476-533' if you have ' . . ~y questiOni.. , • E ~ : ' ' . . . • • . ~ ~ . ~ , ~ . . . . ~ ' . ~ . ' I . ~ i ~ ' ' ~ ~ • : . . . ,aYD. i • . • t . . n~ @y ~ICy . , . ; . ~ . i . ~ . Vafl'~f1~ge M 'on , . ~ . . . _ , ~ ~ . • ~ . . i ~ , . . , . . , ' i : ' . . ' ; . • ~ . ~ • ' ~ . ~ , . ~ . • i . , . . . i , . • ~ . y . . . f . . . . S l ~ ~ ' ' ' • • ' ' f . • . , t . . ~ . . ~ . . ' . . ' ' . . j ~ I . ' . . ~ . , . ~ ' ~ ~ 'r; . _ - IK • ~ ~ ~ - ,r i,ai1.DaW 110 rlr 103.1 e~~h~OUNTflII~ VAIL VALLEY AND AVON ~ J p~ `'q~~~y _ s ' ' . . _ tl'L'Wi 9A?.ddiri ~ FOUrr~MOnr Tuesdlay Nights ,w 44~~~ ~ 6o30 pm , 00 ~0 vgWxl~t SPffC1AL JULY 4YE-0 YIR~-9 P.RA. ~.qp `~0°' ieloo. ~ ~ IE'ord Amphfl$~eater ~,Q~~ Vail9. Colmrado ~'19'9 THE eAIL eALLEY FoUNDATIoN LND Y6i& SYAFF OF 469E FORD AMPHITHEATER MEMoND voU sHAr THE FOLLo~~~ ~ERMIMD slor VAYaI1R7 Ya9E ffd?CILJYY: ? Smoking ? Lawn Chairs ? Cameras o Sealed non-alcoholic ~ ~y~ p~ g~ beverages may be bmught 000 ~ ~9 ~ E into the amphitheater. m4blY 70U FOR YOUR COOPEIRAYIOPd. CONCERT S ERIES TOWN OF VAIL MEMOR.ANDUM TO: Robert McLaurin Council Members FROM: Judy Popeck DATE: June 19, 1995 RE: Investment Report Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of May 31, 1995., We are in the process of closing our Dana Investments account with Colorado National Bank and transferring it to Bank One in Wisconsin. This should be completed prior to the end of June. A$1, 000, 000 FNMA was purchased on May 16, 1995 with a yield of 6.037% maturing on November 14, 1995. Also a$1,000,000 FHLMC was purchased on May 25, 1995 with a yield of 5.9333% maturing on July 20, 1995.. The estimated average yield for the debt service fund was 5.84% and 6.52% for the pooled cash fund. Currently the yield curve for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year are 5.65%, 5.61%, and 5.49% respectively. Please call me if you have any questions. ~ Town of Vail, Colorado Investment Report . Summary of Accounts and Investments For 4he fiNonth Ending May 31, 1995 Balances Percen4age 5/31/95 of Total Money MarEcet Accounts (see page 1) Commercial Banks $2,515,527 12.00% Money MarEcet Funds $135,074 0.64% To4al $2,650,601 12.64% Commercial Savings Banks & Loans ~ Certifica4es of Deposit (see page 2) Eagle Counfiy Ins4i4u4ions 0.00% 04her Colorado Institutions $198,000 $198,000 0.94% Na4ional Insti4utions 0.00% To4al $198,000 $198,000 0.94% Percentage of Por4folio in Savings & Loans 0.00% U.S. Govemmen4 Securi4ies (see page 3) Treasury Notes & Bills $5,799,792 27.66% GiVNiA's $76,935 0.37% U.S. Savings Bonds $28,432 0.14% Federal Agency Discoun4 Nofies & Bonds $12,216,869 58.26% To4al $18,122,028 86.43% Total Porffolio $20,970,629 100.00% Ma4uring VVithin 12 flHon4hs $17,095,081 81.52% AAa4uring VVithin 24 Months $2,802,739 13.37% Maturing After 24 AAon4hs $1,072,809 5.19% $20,970,629 100.00% 6/19/95 invsmjlp Money fVlarket Accounts - as of May.31, 1995 --For the Month of fViay-- Institution Balances Type of Accounts High Low Average 5/31/95 CONAIVIERCIAL BANK ACCOUiVTS First Bank of Vail - Operating Interest 5.805% 5.657% 5.702% Balance $4,313,037 $2,633,097 $3,392,202 - $2,513,476 First Bank of Vail - Insurance Interest 5.805% 5.657% 5.702% Balance $1,072 Colorado Na4ional Bank Super Now Account Interest 3.500% General Operating Account Balance $979 Total Commercial Bank Accounts $2,515,527 fViONEY NiARKET FUNDS . First American Corp. Trust Treasury Fund Bond Reserve Interest 5.457% Balance $86,062 U.S. Treasury Securities Money fVlarket Fund Interest 5.687% Balance . $43,269 Fidelity Investment Govemment Nioney Market Accounts Interest 5.690% Bond Issue Reserve Account Balance $5,743 Total Money Market Funds $135,074 Total all accounts $2,650,601 `*Account Subject to Arbitrage Rebate 6/19/95 invmmjlp Page 1 0 Certificates of Deposit . as of May 31, 1995 Bank iVame, Location Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturi4y Maturity Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value BesfiBank, Thomton Colorado FDIC 7.250% 16-Feb-95 16-Feb=97 627 $99,000 Bank of Greeley, Greeley Colorado FDIC 5.000% 5.120% 16-Jun-94 16-Jun-95 16 $99,000 - Avg Yield 6.185% $198,000 6/19/95 invcdjlp Page 2 ~ 0 Govemment Securities as of May 31, 1995 •••Treasury Notes 8 Bills••` Days to Days Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity to Book Par Type Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value TNote Pooled 4.2509G 4.340%, 17-AAay-93 15-May-96 1094 350 $499,559 $500,000 TNote Pooled ' 3.875%, 6.009% 13-Oct-94 31Act-95 383 153 $793,155 $800,000 TNote Pooled 6.5009U 6.553% 13-Oct-94 30Sep-96 718 488 $499,667 $500,000 TNote DebtService 5.605%, 07-Ju1-94 15-Nov-95 496 168 $1,347,143 $1,350,000 TBill Pooled 6.180% 17-Nov-94 27-Ju1-95 252 57 $990,628 $1,000,000 TNote Pooled 6.858°J5 05-Dec-94 30.Sep-95 299 122 $990,464 $1,000,000 Zero Pooled 7.820% 21-Jun-91 15-Nov-95 1608 168 $679,176 $700,000 AVerege Yield 6.20% $5,799,792 $5,850,000 Average Days to AAaturity 215 ,°•GNAAA'S•°' Years to Estimated Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Principal Pool Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding 5803 8.00095 8.4809b 14Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 11.00 $25,781 13003 8.000°l6 9.5003U 240ct-86 15-Oct-06 20.20 12.00 $22,239 14659 8.000% 9.20096 240d-86 15-Jan-07 21.20 13.00 $28,915 Avg Yield 9.045% $76,935 °"U.S. Savings Bonds`•• Years to Issue Maturity . Maturity Years to Book Maturity Series Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value EE 7.170% 01-Oct-86 01-Oct-96 10.00 1.34 $28,432 $30,000 '°'Federal Agency Discount Notes & Bonds"' Days/Years to Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Book Maturity Agency Fund Coupon reld Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value SBA Pooled - Dana 9.725% 26-May-94 25-Mar-2008 13.8 12.8 $100.892 $109,734 FHLAA Pooled - Dana 8.396% 28-1un-94 01-Mar-2019 24.7 23.8 $58,775 $66,355 FNMA Pooled - Dana 7.4709G 28-Jun-94 01-Oct-2017 23.3 22.4 $86,645 $97,572 FNAAA Pooled - Dana 8.866% 29-Jun-94 01-Jun-2014 19.9 19.0 $87,978 $110,531 SBA Pooled - Dana 10.225% 29-Jun-94 25-Feb-2008 13.7 12.7 $77,019 $82,749 SBA Pooled - Dana 9.475% 29-Jun-94 25-Jun-2019 25.0 24.1 $104,630 $106,523 SBA Pooled - Dana 10.225% 18-Aug-94 25-Ju1-2008 13.9 13.2 $93,715 $109,875 SBA Pooled - Dana 10.225% 29-Jun-94 25-Jan-2008 13.6 12.7 $99,693 $110,088 FNRAA Pooled - Dana 7.11196 27-Aflay-94 01-AAay-2020 25.9 24.9 $82,175 $100,577 SBA Pooled - Dana 9.725% 12-1u1-94 25-Jun-2019 25.0 24.1 $105,151 $108,744 , SBA Pooled - Dana 9.475°5 08-AAay-95 25-Dec-2019 24.6 24.6 $99,201 $99,391 FNAAA Debt Service 6.912% 27-Feb-95 17Jan-97 1.9 1.6 $284,046 $280,000 FNMA Pooled 6.512°16 22-Feb-95 17-Nov-95 268.0 Days $485,441 $500,000 FHLRflCPooled 5.93396 26-AAay-95 20-Ju1-95 55.0 Days $992,098 $1,000,000 FNMA Pooled 6.037% 16-May-95 14Nov-95 182.0 Days $973,279 $1,000,000 FHLB Pooled 6.749% 02-Mar-95 02-Aug-96 1.4 1.2 $755.288 $750.000 FHLAACPooled 6.789% 27-Mar-95 23-Aug-96 1.4 1.2 $735,306 $750,000 FHLRAC Pooled 6.200°16 17-Mar-95 02-Aug-95 138.0 Days $989,444 $1,000,000 FHLB Pooled 6.0949G 28-Apr-95 06-Sep-95 131.0 Days $1,476,093 $1,500,000 FHLB Pooled 6.370%, 27-Mar-95 16-1an-96 - 295.0 Days $336,556 $350,000 FHLB Pooled 6.600% 31-AAar-95 10-May-96 1.1 Days $700,242 $700,000 FHLB Pooled 6.808% 05-Dec-94 04-Aug-95 242.0 Days $997,575 $1,000,000 FHLB Pooled 6.412% 26-Jan-95 26.1un-95 151.0 Days $995,627 $1,000,000 FFC Pooled 6.150% 01-Dec-94 01-Jun-95 182.0 Days $1,000,000 $1,000,000 FHLAA Pooled 4.560% 4.5609l, 03-Jun-93 03-Jun-96 3.0 1.0 $500,000 $500,000 $12,216,869 $12,434,139 Average Yield 6.52% Average Years to Maturity ' 9 Total $18,122,028 6/19l95 invtrjlp Page 3 : ! u e: Coc~~,e. ~ ! ~uKe 22, a~~s i ~ 4: 30 lu~tte~ tle Pa„iu! :~r~~et~I ~o~a iJ "oeu.~rc~ aua.' ~res~u! u~E Be 1 s4 cad Pa•c cui~ k cufadaZ&, ~ SEN'' BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-20-95 ~ 16~17 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 2/ 7 , xc~ CC~uu~ . MELTE4b TR&NSPORTATION MAsTER co ~ wddLsy9 &M 16, 1995 ~ubf~~ ~ Aele~ I~lleaeocip~ ~UlI~~ to ~~~rs~OPD Present: - 7asines Johaason-FAgle Coun4y Dave Williaaaas-Vael I)uly Nt'uchael Gallagher-Mntum Tanomas Hines-Avmn Keng Myeri-Vaal Assocaates Richard Cames-Avoao Bob McIlveen-Beaveg Ce&. Resort Co_ Chrns Fztos-(iypsum Muke Rose-@I'auY George Roussos Eagle Coiaeaty . Afichelle Fronge1eo-A1won Lacrry Broaks-Avon bill Kovaceviclh-Tms. T'ask ]Fogce Jaane Deane-Eaag~e County ]C,arsy Grafe1-Vail I. (Dpeaaixag A- Tae meeBing was operxed at 8:25 a.m by dames Johnson, Eagle Coalnty , CoanmissioneP. B. lLatry Bgooks intradaar.ed Ibfichol9e Frongeleo who is now iaa dheir Taansporta4ion Muke4eng area. U. Goafls A. The rransportation MasgeP Ptan fl. The Mastee Plaaa as not a ballot or anarketing tool. . 4. We are settdumg up gtoured aiales_ b- The Mas4eP Plaea sanust be separated from any polatical considerations. 2. '%'hc Master Plara as not a PlaBa of Opoo-afioais T7ae Plan of Opcrations wi19 be done by the Regional Traa?spvrtaBion Autboraty Boatd. b. 7his Authorety vr,ill consas4 og one meanber firam each • meapnfcipality, the Couaaey snd the Beaver Creek Resoug Cornpany. . B. Txaasporta8non Survey 1. ThC Vaufl A55oc1a4e.5 hAS the SUeFIey HB8 f{BTOgreSB Ofl] $vw0 flCN@jS. . Swxv+oying of focus groups (Il) Why theg, did os d'nd not vrote for the transpartation 8ax whan es was on the ballog. . (2) Fo6us gaoups do be doae by Jan@y 10. SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-20-95 ; 16:17 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 3/ 7 ' Ti-ansportatioa Master Plan Committee ~ Minutes, 7une 16, 1995 $ttbv'E'~~ ~ Page Two Ct rp ~ Si ah b. Telephone Survey (l) What do the voters want? (2) Telephone survey to be done by July 18. c. All survey numbors processed by the third week'in 7uly. (1) The survey will give us direction on what sppropriately should be funded by any proposed ballot initiative. (2) We already have costs associated with lease purchase and cash purchase from the secand Transportation Summit. C. What Do We Mean-I,evels of Service 1. What Calculations to Use Levals of Service7 a. Use .5 cent sales tsx in our calculations. b. Which ca[culations will best service the needs7 (1) Leate purchase (green sheets) (Z) . Cash purchase (yellow sheets) 2. What does the group envision when speaking of Levels of Service? , a. Geographical servico areas b. Para-transit c. Maintenance facilitias , d. 5helters e_ Define deficiencies in the current levels of service III. Levels of Service A. Geographical Service Areas 1. Leadville a. Existing sarvice (1) Two morning routes • (2) Two evening routes (3) One exclusive route run by Beaver Cresk Resort Company , b. Expanded service (1) Four moming routes year-gound (2) Four evening routes yaar-round I ~ SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-24-95 ~ 16:17 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 4/ 7 R Traasportataon Master Plan Commtittee 1~in~atos, 7une 16, 1995 s~b~~ ~ I?, Pago Three . Sroyp 2. Rcd C?af.fMntiaan a Exbstang service-none b. &~~oposed service (1) Two morneng rou4es year-rouad (2) 7Cwo evening routes }?car-rouad (3) Commutar toutes on 20 passenger people moeets. (4) Possible expansion to wwmmodate evening work hoenrs aaad sestaurant patrons. 3. Eagle-Vaal 9. Escis9ing service-nonc b: Proposed seMce (1) Colloctor routes usiaeg 20 passenger peop?e rnowess 3?ear- round. ' (2) U.S. Haghhway 6 aouto expanded to accoaeanaodate Eagle- V$1l c9gCB8Ia40P POIItes, 4. A9/oYE & E%&S'tHYIg 5e8'vlCe (1) Expres5 route (2) Commu¢er (3) SeasonaI . b. Expanded service (Y) Express route (2) Destanation stops (3) ycu-aouaad service 5. Edvvards a. lExastivog service (fl) Pae'k and Ride (z) Hfghway 6 Expross goaate b. lExpanded service (fl) Highway 6 commaater aoute year-roeand (a) Hoanestead and othea area subdivusion colloctor routes usisag peop9e movers. . (3) Park and Ride facali4gr 6. Woflaott a. Exastiaag seuvice-eaone b. Proposed serwar.e-Psrk and Rode Facility SENT BY:EAGIE COUNTY ; 6-20-95 ; 16:18 ~ 3033287207- 3034792157;# 5/ 7 ` Transportation Master Plan Committee Subie . Minutes, June 16, 1995 ct ro . ReVjgian Page Four ~ - 7. Eagle a. Existing servicc (1) Papk and Ride Facility (2) Two moming routes-Eagle/Gypsum Express (3) Two eveniag routes-EagleJGypsum Express (4) Seasonal service b_ Bxpanded service (1) ]Park and Ride Facility (2) ]Eour morning routes-Eagle/Crypsum Express (3) 7Four evening routes-Eagle/Cxypsum Express (4) Year-round service 8. Cypsum a. Existing service (1) Park and Rida Facility (2) Two moming rQUtes-Eagle/Gypsum Express (3) Two evening routes-JF.a,gle/Crypsum Bxpress ' (4) Sessonal service b. Facpanded service (1.) Park and Ride Facility (2) Four moming routes-Eagle/Gypsum Express (3) Four evening routes-Eagle/Gypsum P.xpress (4) Year-round service 9. Eagle County Regionat Airport a. Exastirag service-none b. Proposed service (1) Park and Raae Facitity . (2) Bmpl4yec service (3) No commercial service 10. Dotsero a Existing service-none . b. Proposed service (1) Fark gnd Ride Facility (2) Four morning routes-extension of EagleJGypsum Express (3) Four evening routes-exterosion of Eagle/Gypsum Exprass (4) Year-round seroice , ~ SF1VT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-20-95 ; 16:18 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 6/ 7 a . Tsanspogtuaon Maser P'llmn CoanenitBee RA F-T - Maztutes, 7une 16, 1993 Su~dect t0 fdeviSdOn Page ]Fado 1 Il. Basa1gE1 7ebe& a. EXiS4ing S6rVaC*-RFTA seavace b_ 1Bxpanded service (1) RFIl'A service (2) Tas mon~ generated irn thgs aroa to go for existing mr ex-paaaaea MA services os tiails. 12. Vaifl L Existang scevace-V7C~ Destiaaation Stop b. Exparaded service . Q1D Westirs/d.ionshead (sueraamer)ITransporta4eon Centeg (yeaa- ~ound) (2) Othcv stops as neededl 13. Beader Creelc to @tail G. lExisting service (1) Cy98C5$ICiY1pI0yBC S'Oute $hfOllg}E BCSVeS Q:PeeIC 4f1P.18a $O Va. (Z) ,.~omI9al 8l1111Y31eP b. Expanded service (1) Re50rt CoHI1pSiPy VR/lIY d0 feCdeH' TOl1$C t1So11$h BCaVCP Creek. (2) Regional Systcan to Easg Lo4 at BC, Avon, EVress . (3) SeweeQta bteses (4) Becoxrnc part of the Itegional Systein 14. Coaarntty Z'raaesig Sysgem Partacipants a. Vail-Witl confinue presen¢ syseem b. Avon-Will continue present sysdem C. ~eavcy- Cgeek Resort Company-Wil1 c.ontinue presemt system dl- Rcgiomal Tpmsig System-Will connect communitaes and presen4 ssrsteeras. . B. Maiaatenance lFacilities 1. Preseuag Il.ocations a. Vail 'D'ransporta4aon Cepateg lb. Town of Avon ~ 2. PossnbHe Satelae$e Iocataon$ A. I,e4drrul8e b. Vacinity of Eaglc Couaaty Regaonal Afepor¢ SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-20-95 ~ 16:18 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;f, 7/ 7 ± . . Transportation Master Plan Committee , Mi ~RAFT\ nutes, June 16, 1995 Subf~ Page Six ~t ro Re1rrsiOn C. Para-Transit 1. 2,400 haurs budgeged the first year of regional service. 2_ 730 hours every year after initial start up year. . 3. ADA Compliance siandards to be met. D. Other • 1. Shelters-safe,, secure, well-lighted 2. Address growth problems pertaining to bus system 3_ Address environmental concems IV. Itcgional Transportatian AuQhority A. RepYCSCtItahOn l. Municipalities-one each ,2. Beaver Creek Resori Company-one 3. Eagle County-one B. Timelines 1• Each group to be represented to submit a nominee's name to the County Cnmmissioners' Office by June 30. 2. A Resolution for the Autharity and appminting it membcrs will be on the July I1 Eagle County Commissionors Mee4ing Agenda. V. Next Mecting A The Transpartation Master P1an Committea will meet on: Juty 7, ] 995 8:00 am. to 12-00 noon Avon Municipal Building, Avon B. Ellie Caryl will present the Bike Path Componemt for consideration_ C. County staff will provide demagraphic information and a ooncept plan for the Regional Transportatiom Bus Systam. ~ , x e : ?~ca~ ~~~,c. ~ June 12, 1995 . D ~ Ms. Peggy Osterfoss Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. , Vail, CO 81657 Dear Peggy: I enjoyed meeting and working with all of you. Congratulations on the progress you made at the transportation meeting of June 6, 1995. Enclosed is a summary of the meeting notes. Please don't hesitate to cali me at 612-975- 2100 if you have any questions or concerns. Good Luck! Sincerely, •i / ' - . Hersch . Wilson Pecos River Learning Centers, Inc: HW mwm • Encl. Pecos Kiver Leurninr Centecs, Inc. -6011 Esecutive Dr.. Eden Prairir_. i11\ 553=1=1-36i7 U5A 'I'eL• 613-975-21110 F.iz: 612-975-2199 r Vail Valley Regional Transportation Meeting - , Summary of the Vail Valley Regional . Transportation Meeting , June 6;1995 Common vision It is 1997, the unified Regional Transportation System is valley-wide with connections to Leadville, Glenwood.and Summit counties. It is a convenient, user-friendly system available year round or as demand dictates. A strategic long-term plan for the system is in place; the current infrastructure provides for the replacemerit of rolling stock and mainteriance of the system's facilities. - The systern is :ndepEndently uperaLc-d and managed by a joint board of directors composed of individuals from each of the appropriate county communities and private entities. The system has reduced transportation costs'for valley residents and has positively impacted environmental concerns and parking shortages. The system is funded by a combination of federal grants, fare boxes and an increase in the county wide sales tax. The Regional Transportation System has received , • wide public support. Agreements from the meeting • The ballot initiative will be put in place for a November, 1995 vote. In order accomplish this, the initiative will be submitted no later than August 15, 1995. * Two options will be submitted iriitially, one with bike paths and one without. In the interim, a survey of county residents will be conducted to test public opinion on the two options. The option with the most support will be submitted for vote and the other option will be dropped by August 15, 1995. The survey effort will be funded by the Eagle County Leadership Forum. • A boarci of directors will be appointed to manage the system. Each one of the appropriate communities and private entities will appoint one person to serve on the board. The board of directors will have the responsibility of managing . the master plan and have the responsibility of selecting an operating organization (private or public). The relationship among transportation board, county and communities will be benchmarked on the Summit County model.. • An interim board of directors will be appointed by June 15,1995. They will be asked to develop the master plan and recommend a service level for the July 18, 1995, regional transportation meeting. Based on their findings, a sales tax level will be discussed and agreed upon at the meeting on July 18; 1995. 7 O June, 1995, Pecos River Learning Centers, Inc. Page 1 i , Vail Valley Itegional Transporfation liReeting The following individuals were appointed to serve as interim members on the board of directors: City of Vail: . Tom Steinberg _ Alternate: Peggy Osterfoss Avon: Tom Hines or Richard Carnes , Vail Associates: Kent Myers . Eagle County: james Johnson Transportation Task rorce: . Jill Kovacevich Minturn: ' Mike Gallagher Gypsum: . Chris, Mike or Jeff The other entities will be contacted by Eagle County to appoint members to the interim board. Eagle County will also supply the support, provide the support staff to the interim board artd coordinate the first meeting. , ~ O June, 1995, Pecos River Learning Centers, Inc. Page 2 . - .r, . ; . _ . _ XC • ~ ~ June 8, 1995 ID7'~l. Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage v ~ Vail, Colorado 81657 SUBJECT: Medical Center Mobile Lab Port Dear Council Members, As owners of Unit #202, Scorpio Condominiums on West Meadow Drive, we are particularly concerned about the Medical Center Mobile Lab Port being considered by the Town Council at this time. I Although we understand the importance of diagnostic equipment for area residents, we question if this is the appropriate location of this facility. A major docking port of this magnitude hardly is in keeping with the residential environment of this area. Considering heart surgery is not conducted at the Medical Center and it is not anticipated that there is sufficient local need to permanently house the lab in the building, another location not within a residential area of the village makes more sense. Also, once the docking port is in, other uses for it are available to the Medical Center. We already have noise from the Frontage Road and don't want the possibility of adding more. A permanent docking port for a 60' long 15' high semi-truck trailer has commercial/industrial elements incompatible with residential environment. This is not the appropriate location for the catherization lab and/or any other truck-trailer usage. We urge you to consider the negative effect upon the character of the area and impact on property values, as you proceed with your review of this conditional use permit application. Please advise the scheduled date for public hearing on this issue. We also are interested in attending any neighborhood meeting prior to the Town Council's public hearing, and would appreciate being advised of tre same, so we can make plans to he present. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and concerns and your response to this letter. Sincerely, elmosse 5420 Renaissance Avenue San Diego, CA 92122 (619) 756-3795 Fax (619) 756-9591 cc: Ken Barber, Rawhide Company East Village Homeowners Association ~ . _ . - XC'. C&AAL %ma~ ~ 90~w+'~"~"'•- A ~ Dy s ~ 5 t 1. e. { ~ I ..i. '{i ..7, r . Thir runny tha- teauwith.ruperb ~r ,p0(ZiZj`le Dlt)IlBI''S ' anrique.r and in- viting comfort u one of.rix mag- -s`= - - nifrcent private - - ~ . x • re.ridence.r oie the - r•~- ~ _ 12th annual Bert of Beauer Creek ~ Hmne Tour June 25 to bene~t the Colorado Ski Mureum in Vail. . . ~ ~ s~-:~lr . OME of the most magnificent photographs, clothing, equipment t~ i ~ - homes in Colorado have made and videos. ~9~~~ ' the Beaver Creek Home 7'our a r-- . must-see for those who love to see The yellow chateau pictured here laqish residences in an elite moun- echoes the architecture ofa historical tain community that usually guards building the owners admired in Aus- • its privacy zealously. tria several years ago; the shade of The 12th annual Best of Beaver yellow is seen on churches through- Creek Home Tour next Sunday from out that country. [nside, glorious 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. continues that tra- crystal chandeliers, superb antiques, dition, with a half-dozen spectacular gorgeous colors and sensational 4- homes opening their doors. --The tour views combine in a splendid settine. , benefits the Colorado Ski Museum- The Texas family has had a home in Ski Hall of Fame in Vail. Founded in 1976, the museum is a nonprofit.or- . Continued on page 9 ganization depicting more than 120 years of Colorado ski history through' . Photos by GRO8@1 MaA't1f@ .c•~~ ~,•.i. /vnn IA /OOC "r(ia nonvor Pncl Mno"ina'/Z v.r 0 6JG/Q,' /Xt. ' • ~ " e . " ' - S i',4a[~~.'~\~O'~ (~C ~'c'`'~~SY¢i't~N~'1~(t`. +S S # z~f~~/~'~~~ {'`c)£ICc(~~'~,~..~4<;~ µta ~.t s~~',t~r f ~~~d to be ' c v E R ~ . T 0 R Y o91ly m who, ONS have been following in their fathers' footsteps a zin this country at least ' ~llowe ~ e~ . since the days when Cot- ton Mather joined 1n- ' S., crease in preaching to the .,b a J' , Aadp~ foobftps0 Colonists. But except Story I7y: perhaps in Hollywood, : Jack where countless daugh- . N. 4 ' But changes. in ters of actors have grown . ' _ 4 'up;to become actresses, female-children only in recent years @4 - NO,h ' o have begun taking up the same line of ~Socletp ; 4hd`,~°-0 . work as their.:dads. The process has been hastened, ob- viously, by the dismantling ofgender n 6arriers that once channeled women fa'~s~h~v~ = . into careers.as nurses, schoolteachers and social: workers. It would be an in- ' sult to [he women involved, however, , aI'0~/~ to condude that daugh.ers are now joining the'ir fathers in,the workplace rrierely because it f nally has become ftr ~~~~~~ika socially acceptable to do so. Some- ` thing else is.-goin9 on here. K ` ~SK.'... . ' . ' . . . . ~ . : . , • . . t ' Joe anel Carey Bozevich' Like their, male brethren; girls may . 4.~ ~1@~A/ ~''a~1~1~11~ • For the part.l0 year.r, Carey. ha.r workedwith herfather, zi~ho.raid• `She in some cases be motivated by the had to learn to c'all mz Joe i?zrtead ofDad around the oce.' simple desire to win their fathers' love . , , • ' - ' . • and respect. In other cases, the "like ' . father, like daughter" phenomenon . ' may be explained as a matter of expe- ' • dience. 1t has always appeared, at Here s what's- needed for ' I~c: y~~ -~~.1ip~~ oved voti][19 S By Shepard PIGveI mined to exercise their voting privileges. fore the polls clos . But from their collectivf aP9d Rick Daily Consider a few (whose names we've egperiences, we gleaned a few insights - o; Special to The Denver Post changed in deference to privacy): varying significance - for improving the reg. lthough Denver's dramatic, often w Sarah, eight months pregnant with her istration_and voting process: brnising mayoral race generated a second child, traveled by bus, with toddler in S4rengthen the "Motor Mo4er" lstv fair amount of cynicism, such high- tow, to her precinct, only to discover she was We encountered several Denver residents Aprofile political battles offer a rich still registered at her old address. who thought they had registered to vote wher harvest of rewards: focusing attention on im- w gill, a lank portant public policy issues, motivating in- Y, g~-natured man who had they renewed their driver's license at the Di- cumbents and challengers to find better and failed to complete his registraiion form be- vision of Motor Vehicles. They had filled out more efficient ways to govern, generating a cause he hadn't realized that he could use his the registration application, some (as of Julc ~ communitv-minded esprit de corps among current address - a homeless shelter. 1, 1994) even had their registration to vote thousands bf campaign volunteers, and re- 'o Frank, who took two buses from his designated on their driver's licease. But or. minding citizens of a remarkable political in- Place of work to tell us he had registered dur- Election Day they received -surprising news: strument - the ballot box. _ ing an organized voting drive, but wasn't on they weren't on the voting list at their pre- the authorized list at his precinct. ciact. Vde learned that they had to get "back- From our vantage point, as Election Day so Tom, who registered to vote at the same up" documentation from the' Department of volunteers assisting folks who faced legal or time his wife did, when they renewed their Revenue in order to prove fhey were register- technical problems in voting, the view of our driver's licenses. She was on the voting list; he ed. Ttus was a tune-consuming task virtually fellow residents was inspiring, often poignant. wasn't. impossible to perform on such short notice, For 12 hours, we encountered - by phone and We were able to help some; others faced in person - committed Denverites deter- procedural obstacles we could not resolve be- Please see bOTIR9G on 5E I~~- I ~ pu Ro tN te,ya..Hom a:.A c,ow WI&z ;ti (56n*~ . DW, AnP ild. P'W~5 fiN~ WoRrN I6 In~C~{f io ~Amo."f' iN ~ A5 94W-. D :~'4 ~ . ~ ~ ' + ~ ;f•T ~11' ' • ' -1;~~:=;~;: ~ G~ - yu•~'~;.:.T~a,:Y;~;... 8,m 5Aw 9 AO'aYe 4~. MCdl S'bme.l ~ ~ IIP . . . _ _ . . _ . . _ . ' r ~ . . . .A a unei uuugeL auur.s we uas, an everyvue nuuwa „ ° , ~ ~ ~ ' - . _ , ' r ~ eior IN.IlvedVAPNd the way "Jre voter 11S3L;5 G from Page 1 E tain up-to•date lists in our increasin I tran• purged ~~~~N • B Y admmistrativel ea ensive „sient society, and to diswurage voter fraud, discourages cit~ien participatonrement that closing registrat on books 30 daystin advance sible election. and incansistent with state law which say;; by reconfirming voter addresses. But, in prac- m~^ that the "voter•yes" designation on the driv- tice the wholesale removal of names from Colorado's law allews "purged" voters who of an election cuts voter turnout by up to 9 yoting is like staking a claim or makiog license "shall be the elector's receipt." voting lists has disproportionately disenfran- m~t certain residency requirements to rein- Percent. (The last day to register to vote in investment, and it serves us all to infuse es,. er's y. P man Americans as ossible with a Prop~ vidently, an occasional communications chised low-income and minority citizens. state their registration, even on Election Day, Denver's June 6 mayoral iun-otf election was breakdown occurs between the county clerk';, The requirements o[ Colorado's voter purge but few eligible electors or election workers May e.) etary mterest in the well•being of our nation,a,,, „ office and the Division of Motor Vehicles, law, even as amended, go beyond what seems are aware of this last•minute option. Further- In many ways, personal and advance reg- Conclusion is,.. , , more, the state s provision for voter rein• No Denver election will be without pro~; a w ch is supposed to forward voter registra- necessary. Two categories of registered elec- , istration requirements defy logic. Voter fraud tion applications and changes on a weekly ba• tors are deemed "Inactive" (a precursor to S~tement is not as broad or voter•friendl as ~s hardly prevented b traosferrin the re is• lems. The logistics of big•city races are imu,,, sis. "Motor Voter" legislation is perhaps the being purged): those who have moved without its federal counterpart, and thus may not be tration burden from the state to the individu• mensely challenging. mos significant recent national eFfort ta ex• notifying the county clerk of their new ad- in compliance With the National Voter Regis- al. And it exaeerbates a disturbing phenome- Despite the eEficiency and hard work 61 pedite the registration of our voting•age popu• dress, and those who have not moved but who tration Act. non: the c6asm in voter turnout between the Denver's hig6ly regarded election staff, pti~'~"" lation (and Colorado helped lead the way, in did not vote in the preceding general election. Aufometlc or Election Dey regisiretion wealthy and the poor. The few states that per• tential glitches loom at each precinct, afi(F-14 1984, with a citizen initiative). It would be un• The first category makes sense - if ou've Either of these reEorms would obviate the mit voting without advance registration (@Vis• with every absentee ballot. But some admin-A-~'-~.' fortunate , indeed, if this important public pol• moved outside of your precinct's boundaries need for the other suggestions. The United consin, North Dakota, Minnesota and, more istrative obstacles to voter reglstretion cHh"'s•" ~ icy were compromised unwittingly by admin• you shouldn't vote in your former nei hbor~ States is alone among Western democracies recently, Wyoming) are not awash in voter be eliminated in inexpensive ways, enabling "u istrative omission. B in imposing an affirmative obligation on its traud. hundreds of additional citizens to vote. RePorm "voter ur in a ain h°°d• And the county knows who has moved, citizens to register. The original motivation Eighteen years ago, Congress considered a p 9 9 9 because it mails an elector information ~A principal purpose of the National Vater card" to everyone on its registration list. If behind our relatively stringent, advance-re • universal voter-re istration lan re uirin Precinct workers, for instance, could f g B P 4 B ward basic informatfon about Election Registration Act of 1993 (which Colorada's someone 6as relocated, the U.S. Postal Ser- istratian requirements should give us pause. Election Day registration. In her testimon "voter purge" law was redesigned to imple• vice affixes the correct address on the card Early in our history, few states even required on the bill before the 5enate Committee on ~emedies to citizens who find themselv,~s.,~4 . ment) is to prohibit "the remaval of the name and returns it to the clerk's office, B utiliz- registration in advance of voting. Even as Rules and Administration Colorado's then- missing From the list of authorized electo of any person from the official list of (regis• ing the postal service's National Chan e of ~ate as the 1890s, most states with registra• Secretary ot State, Mary Estill Buchanan of-, Perhaps a single sheet guide, entitled Com;~:,,~, B tion requirements put the onus on public em• fered several insights that remain timel ; mon voting snafus that you can correct befor.e.,: • ered voters) by reason of the person's failure Address files, the county can achieve an even ploye~ Who compiled lists of qualified elec- (1) "With the careful use of voter identifi- to vote." Y the polls close. ) higher accuracy.) But large oum6ers of Denver's registered The second criterion for "Inactive" status tors. Personal registration and registration cation and good management, Election Day Other more comprehensive reforms, re~~a~~~ ' electors still are being removed from the vot- is !ar less compelling. No important ur ose renewal laws became commonplace only in registration (would) be demonstrably fraud- 'luiring changes in the election statutes, wouTd " , ing lists for precisely that reason. P P the 20th century, and were among the many free." (2) The interest of many voters peaks a j~rmg e'ven greater benefits, trimming admir~'` is served by removing a properly registered devices used to suppress the black vote in the week or so before the election, too late to vote We received numerous calls from people citizen from the rolls simply because he votes South and to discourage poor and immigrant under current registration laws. (3) ~~We in ~strat~ve waste, increasing voter tumout by who went to their polling site, only to discover only occasionally (and fails to submit a"con- voters in the North. the thousands, and reinvigoraling the most sa~~ ' they were no longer eligible to vote. The theo• tinuance card"). government have a major image problem ~'red rite of demacracy. ry behind "voter purging" has merit: to maio- Taxpayers are subsidizing an avoidable and u The Ame~ric~ani Enteripr~'~sePInslitute, a con- ng ou selves to a complet ly penyand acces• v oerd Nevel is a Denver attorney and freelence w~it' g p f r, ick Deily, also a Denvar ettorney who Ilvee In Leko~.; i; . _ ' ~ TOWIV COUiVCIL COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE APPOINTMEIVTS TO: Town Council FR: Pam Brandmeyer DA: June 21, 1995 RE: Committee/Task Force Appointments This is a list of all committees/task forces to which Council members have been appointed or for which they have volunteered. It is my understanding that all assignments run to the next Regular Municipal Election, November 1995. COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. NWCCOG Tom Steinberg Sybill Navas, alternate 2. Vail Valley Tourism & Jan Strauch & Convention Bureau Jim Shearer, alternate (formerly VRA) 3. Vail Transportation and Sybill Navas Parking Task Force Peggy Osterfoss 4. CAST Jim Shearer ' Merv Lapin, alternate 5. VRD/Council Subc,ommittee Merv Lapin Ken Wilson Paul Johnston Ross Davis 6. Art in Public Places Committee Jan Strauch 7. Special Events Committee Sybill Navas 8.. Bravo! Colorado Board Merv Lapin Sybill Navas 9. NWCCOG Water Quality/ Tom Steinberg Quantity Committee Sybill Navas, apprentice 10. Avon-Beaver Creek-Vail Regional Peggy Osterfoss Transportation Committee Tom Steinberg 11. Eagle County Recreation Merv Lapin Authority Paul Johnston, alternate 12. Town of Vail Housing Authority Peggy Osterfoss Jim Shearer, alternate 13. Channel 5 Board 14. VIP Quality Council Member Peggy Osterfoss 15. Vail Valley Arts Council Jim Shearer 16. CAST - Colo. Tourism Advisory Jim Shearer Board Council Merv Lapin, alternate 17. West Vail Master Plan Peggy Osterfoss (Vail Commons) 18. Mauri Nottingham Environmental Tom Steinberg Award 19. Lodge at Vail Land Swap Merv Lapin Paul Johnston Bob McLaurin Tom Moorhead 20. Vail Valley Exchange Peggy Osterfoss Merv Lapin . 21. Channel 5 Sybill Navas 22. Regional Transportation Com. Peggy Osterfoss Tom Steinberg, alt. until '95 elec. C:ITCAPPTS.LST 4 i ee e4t TOW1V OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970 479-2100 - FAX-970-479-2157 MED9A ADVISORV . June 21, 1995 Contact: Suzanne Siiverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office VAVL TOWN C0UNC@L H1GFiLIGHTS FOR JIJtVE 20 Work Sess'son Beae$s Council members present: Lapin, Navas, Osterfoss, Shearer, Steinberg, Strauch --Discussion of Channel 5 Funding The Council voted 6-0 to continue funding of Vail Valley Community Television Channel 5 at its current contribution level (2% of the town's 5% franchise fee from TCI Cablevision) through Dec. 31, 1996. The contribution will provide about $38,000 annually toward the station's $80,000-plus operating budget. Funding of the public access station is no tonger provided in the town's franchise agreement with TCI. It now must be considered as a separate contrac4. In extending Channel 5's funding yesterday, Council members expressed concern about the station's chances of retaining another $30,000 in annual funds previously supplied by TCI through facilities grants and an amount that would approximate a 2% franchise fee from unincorporated Eagle County. The supplemental funding by TCI is no longer mandatory due to changes in the federal cable act. In response, Brian Hall, president of Channel 5's board of directors, said the station could be forced to scale back services. Channel 5 also receives 2% franchise fees from.the towns of Avon and Minturn, plus sponsorship fees from Eagle County, commercial businesses and other organizations. Also yesfierday, the Council postponed a request from Channel 5 to allocate up to $17,000 per year in surcharge fees currently collected by TCI (50 cents per month for residential. subscribers; 25 cents per month for hotel units) until other uses for the community educational grants have been evaluated. In addition, Sybill Navas was appointed to represent the town on the Channel 5 board of directors. In a rela4ed discussion, Merv Lapin said he wras working with Channel 5 and members of 4he news media to develop a regular news program covering items of local interest. For more information, contact Town Attorney Tom fVloorhead at 479-2107, or Jim Penhale, Channel 5 director, at 949-5657. --Design Review Board Interviews The Councit interviewed two applicants for a vacancy on the Design Review Board in preparation for appoinfiment at the evening meeting. The Council also agreed to attend (more) ' 'v Council Highlights/Add 1 the July 24 meeting of the Design Review Board to learn more about the review process. --Larkspur Lane Vacation of Right-of-Way The Council voted 6-0 to direct staff to enter into a contract with four property owners . on Larkspur Lane. The document would outline a process in which the town's right-of- way. would be vacated following construction of retaining walls and an off-street parking area in preparation for creation of an employee housing unit. For more information, contact Town Attorney Tom Moorhead at 479-2107. --Request to Create 3.2 Acres of Wetlands on Katsos Ranch The Council voted 6-0 to allow the Vail Valley Consolidated Water District to proceed through the process to create 3.2 acres of wetlands on the east end of the Katsos Ranch property east of the golf course. The project would complete the district's mitigation ptan mandated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of the Black Lake No. 1 project, located on the west side of Vail Pass. Black Lake was created to augment flows in Gore Creek. In 1991 the town approved creation of 6 acres of wetlands on the Katsos Ranch property. The district was successful in creating 2.8 acres and now needs to create an additional 3.2 acres to meet federal approval. Water district consultants said yesterday the new wetlands plan would utilize existing drainage beds and natural topography to provide the additional wetlands through minimal disturbances on the property. For more information, contact Russell Forrest.in the Community Development Department at 479-2138. --Information Update Next, the Council agreed to join the Eagle County Commissioners in sending a letter to the Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners. The letter will urge the board to maintain a 540 acre parcel of land just west of Dowd Junction as recreational use . rather than changing the designation to urban lands. The letter urges the board to keep the existing recreation designation for four reasons: part of the area is geologically unstable; the property provides a valuable open space buffer between Vail and Eagle-Vail; the area is a critical habitat for elk and deer; and recreational access to the Eagle River should be maintained on the property. For a copy of the letter, or for additional background, contact Russell Forrest in the Community Development ~ Department at 479-2138. --Finance Director Steve Thompson invited the Council to attend a performance measurement workshop on June 26. --Public Works/Transportation Director Larry Grafel gave an update on the latest regional transportation meeting in which: 1) a preliminary concept for service and , routes was established; 2) agreement was reached on three funding models; 3) a mission statement was created; and 4) a July 11 deadline was confirmed for appointment of an interim 9-member transportation authority. Each municipality in the (more) 0 ~ Council Highlights/Add 2 county would appoin4 one member, the Beaver Creek Resort Co. would appoint one represen4ative and Eagle County would appoint one person to the authority. Yesterday, the Council appointed Peggy Ostertoss as Vail's representative on the au4hority; Tom S4einberg will serve as al4erna4e until his term expires in IVovember 1995. Council members directed staff to prepare service level criteria and other standards which might assist the authority in making sound business decisions in managing a regional transportation system. For more information, contact Grafel at . 479-2173, or Transit iVlanager fliiike F2ose at 479-2178. --The Council received an update on the various construction projects: Chapel Bridge is now open; the Covered Bridge opened last Friday with removal of the temporary bypass bridge scheduled for tomorrow (Thursday); and the south roundabout will be func4ioning by the July Fourth holiday. The town is continuing.to encourage detours around the iViain Vail intersection. The detour routes are voluntary and are marked by orange signs. --In response to a stafif request that Council appoint a member to an advisory committee to assist s4aff with an update to the Ford Park master plan, the Council voted 3-3 not to proceed writh the update. The Council asked staff to return with the request next week (when all seven Council members are present) to break the deadlock. --Council Reports Tom Steinberg distributed drafts of wa4er issue policy statements from the fNorthwes4 Colorado Council of Governments (NINCCOG) and asked for input. Merv Lapin announced Karen Phillips of Vail Associates has assumed coordinating responsibilities for the Sister Cities project. On another subject, Lapin reported interes4 by the Vail Valley Arts Council in managing the Arts in Public Places program, now administered by the town's Community Development Department. Tom Steinberg reminded stafif to install public access signs along unmarked streamwalk areas of Gore Creek and in the park area to the south of the Vail Athletic Club. Jan Strauch asked if Vail Associates would agree to assist with revegetation of the Spraddle Creek area to safiisfy VA's landscaping commitment outlined in the TO!/-!!A managed growth agreement. Towrn Nianager Bob McLaurin will follow-up. Evenuovg Meetuo~~ Braeffs Council members present: Lapin, Navas, Osterfioss, Shearer, Steinberg --Citizen Participation There was no citizen participation. (more) a ~ Council Highlights/Add 3 --Rezoning of Vail Golf Course Maintenance Facility The Council voted 5-0 on consent agenda granting final approval of a request to rezone the Vail Golf Course Maintenance Facility from natural area preservation district to general use district. --Design Review Board Member Appointment Brent Alm, a local architect, was selected to fill a mid-term vacancy on the Design Review Board, created by the resignation of Sally Brainard, who is moving out of the Town of Vail limits. Alm's term wilf run through February 1996. --Contract renewals , The Council renewed its employment contracts with Town Attorney Tom Moorhead and Municipal Court Judge Buck Allen for another year. --Award Russell Forrest, environmental planner, announced Vail's comprehensive open lands plan has won a national and state award from the American Society of Landscape Architects. # # # 4VAIL TOi~I 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Mayor Vail, Colorado 81657 _ 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 June 20, 1995 Mr. Max Vezzani Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners 620 Centennial Bldg, Room 620 1313 Sherman St. Denver, CO 80203 Ref: Whiskev Creek School Section at Dowd Junction Eagle CountX Dear 1VIr. Vezzani, The Town of Vail strongly requests that the Board of Land Commissioners maintain the recreation desiQnation on the Dowd lunction property in Eagle County and not change the designation to urban lands. M3intaining the Meadow Nt. area and the south side of the Eagle River near powd Junction as open space is critical to maintaining the open and natural character of tbe area. The Town strongly supports main;aining the existing recreation designation on the Dowd property for the following reasans: 1) The area on the south portion of this property (south of I-70) is geologically unstable. Development at this locat:on could result in an inci•eased l;kelihood of debris flow on I-70 blocking our major access ir,to the 7"eN,.m of Vail frem the west. In addition, investigators from the State Disaster Planning Group in 1984 determir.ed that unstable conditions (debris flow hazards) in this area could create a dum c,n the Eagle River and result in a significant flood hazard. 2) This property provides a valuable cpen space buffer between Vail and Eagle-Vail and is critical in the open space character of this area. 3) This area provides critical habitat for elk and deer. This winter, large herds of elk inhabited this area. VJe would also hope that you would maintain the Division of Wildlife lease on the south portion of the property to protect wildlife habitat. 4) There is a river access point west of River Run Apartments which is on this property and provides valuable river access for commercial rafting. Maintaining and enhancing summer recreational opporiunities are a strong interest of the Town. Changing the designation on this land to urban lands and potentially selling it for private development would create a significant negative irnpact in the area by impacting wildlife, open space, recreation, and public safety. We strongly request that the Board consider the above reasons and keep the Dowd Junction properiy in the recreation designation. Sincerely, . ~ a. ~ Margaret A. Osterfoss Mayor , X.C. Roy Romer, Govemor James Lochhead, DNR Bill Wood, U.S.F.S Vail Town Council ~ ~ - , -~---C--~ V , 7, .^vi.~ . - Ct. t[;•' C: . . ~ i r- J ~ ~ r~~ ~l ':~_~L,,~ , ~ C ~'L1 r,~/f ~ . ~ _..1/~ .r ~ L~ll(,~~ ,1... ~ ~ L.~~:•1__~` --~Il,~ ~ ~i(f • ~ 1,~ -1't'Z~},;J~~'-~~> 0_kC-C_~~'` ,I . , : , _ . . , C..~~(' ~1 ~C ~(.,ti-~ G~ti.l%e~,. .~e,-r~.~e.c.~.~.. ' ~ - " ' ? ~ y-~('c.L~-.. - f ~1C~ 1,~;~il ~.:i~~ C: 1, / L _:G •-L~.f_ ~ C- ~.t' t:. C : ~ ( ~ ( ; ~ ` . ~ ' If ~ ' ! '}t%.cl' L(%t,~-i~'T? ~,C,~~.t-. ti~.c:t~ ~_~C'.<< (_~%~.C_c°~_ . .f~~.cCC.~~ -i;-~ 1-r''ti.ti_'~ - I;+,.C~: c' t ~?i.c~~: ~.r 1 ' _l) 1-~..c~. '(,,C.t. C°. 41u..~ l•C~~_i_: f.~'L~ ~ c . ' 1 c.~C'c~~:) cz:~v~_r.~ .--~L.c? / C~c+~ . ~ ; ~ . ~ ~.(•'.C~ 1 C t ~ ~ . L,l!~ C , ~ . l . G J,-° ~ . . ~ cS~- - ~ - _ , , dl rz-'~--'~ . , . ,~t-.~, ~~•~~L~.cv-,r~~C.,~{~ CE1 l~~C. ~'?F ~l~-C'l~~ ~~1;~..~ y~,~~~ ~L,.S-LJ 'bl_~~_.( J~~ ~..CC:y1.,l..f.~t~~~~-'!:~.,9' v~- (.L~,~-~,, ~ ~ j ~1- c. c.~ ~ h.~,c.1,z_ ,~:~..~`~,c.r_C: ~~_r >>_G:._ t;-d_r.'~~~~ `r~ ~ ~ ~ ; :~C 1.r;_ c~~..c.~. ? ~ C. ~ C;~~Y ~ Z.l~~_(". ' ? ~IN. C,P V`~__. .,1.!~'~_• I~L(~,fl' l`(. ~~,•l';l_l;t.~,~'~~C", a- . ' % ~ n i. ~ • / f1 ( / r~~ ~1 n (1 ~.~~Q. ,C.l.'_t.~. C~.{~~ 1..,(~"~C'-C'~1.-9 ~::t..C?~- ' ~.~~~L.C~-C,L~J ~f/l.L~~,L.. (L•`1"1.~.~~ r;1~~~' c L?L ' c" en`;._C~~C. .~LL.(~, ~:~1~,C- ~"l.~.CC~.I~~-.~-'._~:.C,?-C:~L.e('~,~ 2.L~ _[,)tii CC_C(^~~1~ (.~~1Y1:~__l..f:l'.~1L.~1 ~'-•E ;-~'.i_E_(.~.C~.~'L(;~( lqc t j L:-a-C' ? . ``~-F ~c.~l.t'_;?~c~ ~~,~c.,~(t~'ti,~ C.~ . L.~1~k,C~ -~~(;~/._titC~ .~Lf:~~~~~!'. _~:~1~t.t,~- ('.f`~~ r'=' ~ ~ .~~fL~.:~~ Ll.~ C~'r'l,(.~-~ C~, 1.! ~,VI,E~ _ ~l'•?>'~..UZ-T~cZ'-.:'L~Z.:''''~C1~[~=~- . %:1-~~~~C1_ , ~c.;(_ tfi . Uko S)~,f,ti~~_t°_f.~~ ~,~~..C(~_'~~'l~..l'.c_F•h:J ~ ;t.t'-~.(•_..~~ ~,;."Gl Cl~ ~(_~'L'i.~'(.__ • % ) NNLc.~ lf~.c::i::N~~' . l`~ - ~ ? ~ ,r, - ~ ~ ~ . r,~: ~ r' . ~ ~ . (JU7 ; , , L 1., i 4~ J 2.~1n ..~.(,~~~.Q.=1.~~---~~-~-t;'2L~~'L' . .C`:'V1,' t~ C!..2~ ~Y1.C,~~1 c'(y,`% (.C ~.~l.C`. f ~CI1 t. `t. ~l_ G ~ :J L e. (i(~_,'~l_.~ _ ~ c.. , Z_,f'~? . 1( !'.~?l.C-,(~-t:(.~J Ct'._-l.'.C.(.~~.'(_ l . , ~ f%V ;-t_~:~ L.~t c. C:-ti-v' _..-p , , 7 ~ , r y.Jb..~..~o C; , Cc~ ~ ~ ~ `lC~. t_-.._ 1,L,! c~ F..fl;'L ) ~,~~(.~~~.~~---?l~ J1,`~ (,~i-L,.~,~1l;jYl.l~~(_1~71~~~' C:~,c_,% _(G^r~ (.~i~-(_ ~1(._C ~'~CC 1..-~. , ou,clvr,c.~-c 1.c~,C~~~~ LC'_('uZ':~.o Ct,n~tCl~ ~Z~~t.~<.' _`a ~_:4..%. .,C_:~.. ,~_!•,J . K?_~ :l~?("~;' ~ . ~f . `C'.C. CC,~~~-~ ,c~.~ ~r~~«! ,~5-C~ rl'L~ (`.'~,c.c.,~ ~.r.-~:~'_C___ ~.c c~~~_.~-- t,,~?~i.,C- ~T..~;v~: . r~ ~ ; _ . /i ; ` ~ C ~J ; ~ IF.. 4 _ C • . C. ~ ~ ~ ~ : . (c-'1~• ~ l, ll l • <<->>_ ry-~ ~s~c c~ ~`.r ~~~1_., tci.r-4' - ~~'~.~/)i,C~~ ~_~~.~J .~_~~.~•'91"7 ~ (.,i ~'z..~, (.~?,i'',~.~.~`.i C~ ~ ('j 1,~..(:~~_`~~l..f_-t l./.."' ~l v'~-C s') ~j'l.(~(' C?,1J:(-):( . )(tic•l~C~ A.4`1~~.~('i~ L-:.~ _(t!(_~\.~~. \.~`L~.`___ ~l (_`t i• i~~ -Cc~:14 `,i`:_9 lC ,~.t. _ ` . 1 ( r ~ t, ' ' r' ~ •r I " ~ . ~ t,7 4U~ TOiI OF 75 South Frontage Road Office of Mnyor- Vail, Colorndo 81657 ~ 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 March 8, 1993 Charlene Marquez 1785 West Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Dear Charlene: As you're aware, the Van i own l;ouncii and i own o'i Vaii sidii nave emadihcd uri ri~driy rieW C{VeIkiCJ recently in their continued goal of excellence. We are working hard to create a longterm vision for this community and our organization, and to provide top notch services which are responsive to needs and desires of residents and guests. As the Town of Vail is the community's organization, a major part of our improvement depends on continuous dialogue with residents, guests, and second home owners. We have instituted nurnerous avenues for public input over the past few years, including Speak Up meetings, community surveys, and Resident Input Cards. However, we vrill be taking fihe input process to a higher level in the next few months. The Town will be embarking on a comprehensive citizen survey process which vrill include written questionnaires sent to 8,000 residents, as well as focus groups and phone surveys conducted with individuals from all community sectors. The findings from this rnulti-faceted process will be used by the Town Council and all departments to guide decision making, budgetary priorities, and staff time emphasis. We plan to continue the focus groups, as well as the Speak Up meetings and Resident Input Cards, on a year around basis in an effort to stay up-to-date on your thoughts and concerns. Please join us for one of two upcoming focus grouKis, scheduled for "fuesdav, March 16 at 7:00 ' P.M. and Wednesday, March 17 at 7:30 A i1H in tiie CommunRiV Development DepartmenYs conference room. Ten to twelve individuals from ihe community wiii take part in each session and participants will be ericouraged to candidly share iheir thoughts about local issues. Nolan Roseil of. Hosell, Hemmen ana i;ares, an individual who nas done a great dea{ ol' survey work with our c:ommunity in the past, will lead the sessions. Town Council members will not be present in order to facilitate your openness about matters of concern; however, transcripts from the sessions, participant names excluded, will be shared with tt-ie Town Council and department heads following the sessions. Aqain, the success of our community depends ore the involvement of individuals from all local sectors. Please call Desiree Kochera at 479-2118 Fay 5•00 P M Friday March 12 1993 to let us know which #ocus qroup fifs with vour schedule We thank vou in advance for takinq the time to be a part of this imporfant input process Sincereiv, ~ fz Margare~' A-~ Os ~erfoss Mayor S !t f ~ I I ~:~~,i~ '`iF-l:` i rr ' . . I ~ _ _ .i ~ f I .~-c~,n~,~.Q.~-~JL,~ ~t~rv~. . ~ , ,'C,~1.ZLvv~, (,U~-'t~vt.~ l.~~L~. C.'~,~ V C~ , p ZEE'LQ_: , ' 1lCC-c-O ( ,'1.C-t-c ..~vu ( q e TA.r- ~ C~ v ;VZcT-d uu~e.j- Vced cyU vt~-uj-1/., . ` -41/~ tuy , c~2 ~-Jdc-2- , g)yo A-e.p & , ~e- ,Q.w ilvo T5, CY'~ - C-tI`" ` CQ.m GYV VA-: . Q ~Uflk . i ' TZ -7- D v 4~ J~-Cbj T6 _,V,c~.v-L 6)--1--~,eGCj . A`' . ~ . tti~,u,ce.. L; , - 4VAIL T0~-~'N 75 Sout6 Frontage Road Depnrfinent of Public jf'orks/Transportation Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21581FAX 3037479-2166 June 2, 1994 Dear Property Owner/Resident, Lower Matterhorn Ca.rcle West Gore Creek Drive Shasta Place Alta Circle Happy summer to you! The Town of Vail Public Work's Department is geared up for another busy and productive construction season! Included in this summer's workplan is the reconstruction of the above streets in your neighborhood. Your input last year on problem areas, drainage and overall improvements was extremely helpful during the design phase. We are confident that you will be pleased with the end result. Following is the anticipated timeline for completion of this street project. Advertisements for Bids negin Pgay 30, 1994 Pre-Bici Pqeetinc,q June 10, 1994 11:00A.M. PW Admin. Buildinq Bid Opening June 16, 1994 10:00A.Aq. PW Admin. Buildinq Project Start Date July 5, 1994 Substantial Compl.etion September 15, 1999 Final Completion September 30, 1994 As with any construction project, delays and inconveniences can be expected. If you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact Terri Martinez, Project Engineer, at 479-2169. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. , ~ : e~ TO WN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Department of Public FVorks/Transportation Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21 S8/FAX 303-479-2166 August 3, 1994 Dear Property Owner/Resident: Lower AAatterhorn Circle llVest Gore Creek Drive ' Shasta Place Alfa Circle At this point in the summer, the Town of Vail Public Work's Department hoped to be underwray with the reconstruction of the above streets in your neighborhood. The bid process began in May with three bidders far the project coming forward in .1une. After the bids were opened, the lowest bidder, B&B Excavating, vvas still $300,00 over the engineer's estimate and allotted budget. Subsequent negotiations with B&B Excavating failed to bring down the cost of the reconstruction project. The following options were available: 1) Ob$ain more money Frorn the T'own Council for the projec4 2) Fiebid, but the project would not be finished by winter 3) Defer until next year, reb6dding the project in December 1994 The Town Council opted for choice three with a Spring start up date. Again thank you for your cooperation with the delay of the reconstruction project in your neighborhood and hope it hasn't caused any ir-iconvenience. VVe wilf keep you informed as to the rebidding process. in December 1994. if you have any questions or desire additional information, please con#act Terri Martinez, f'roject Engineer, at 479-2169. buYs home sites to keep : o~pen space , . , 8y AIfi~on Anderson TnW._,;of,Englewood had planned ; speciai to Tne Denver Post ' to buy the. parcef and build on Residents;.of, West;Vail. will'; :30:; lots; but, the towri instead continue hiking.'and biking on,48 bought the .property;, under acres of forested ,land :.the town ;,..threat of :condemnation,,: from ' has.agreed to purchase for $2.5. ` Florida `landowner; John Ul- ` inillion, to prevent, development, brich..Closing day for the sale is of 30 hoine sites.:Aug. 30 An'.'appraisal'conducted in "Development on the upper ; December;put the,;value_,of:the ridge would be very, visible," . land north of .Interstate 70 as, ` said :Vail rMayor Peggy Oster- !.high as ,$4,1 million,depen'ding foss:' "Our goal is to maintain ; on th , e: number, of : lots.devel; some, open space ;around the. oped Gateway Development tuwn of Vail:" (,(j-f f ~q -1 V I r"'.% C_-~f ~ ~ ~ . J ~~U~~ <.;(,%1'i1 S ~.J ~ . ` ; ("s • ~ y «l f ~I~+1~\'?~lJ.._:~;y)t^i~'\_,~ , L`~~•~1,: ~~"'~~7~.~C.,~~ , f/`11 ~ 1~~~~1~C~'~i1.~:.i~\'1.,^'~- ~~~.~1~~(~%i'~?~'~` f V?Y`~~ U~- i~e~~ ~,,I~~t.~~~~-~~ ~f':( ) ~1l ~l- ~ 1..,~JY~C. / /1-,~; t_ . t` ~~~_n 4~_ l~_, .V~ ~1•(•~ ~,.c., - r~. I ~~~~1 % l~ ~.'\S~'~ '1;' ,•1'~.~ : • . . _ , f~ . 7 , ~ - kn _V q • ~ I fj.4.-~ ~U;t~' A. c1 ~ , ~ ~~b _ . . ~ TOWVN ~OF V~IIL 75 South Trontage Rond Dcpartment of Conr.m7rnity Developnr.cnt [~Ril, Colorado 81657 303-479-21381479-2139 July 27, 1992 Ms. Charlene Marquez 1785 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 RE: Letter Concerning B(iegal Units at 8773 Shasta Piace Dear Chariene, I wanted to write you to let you know that we have received your letter dated July 10, 1992. Staff is in the process of researching your concern about the illegal units at 1773 Shasta Place as well as the clothes line at 1875 West Gore Creek Drive. These issues will take some time to review so I ask for your patience during this research time. Our department does care about your concern and will try to get back to you in a prompt manner. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, ~TA~ Kristan Pritz Community Developmcnt Director e TOWN OF UAIL 75 Soiith Frontnge Road Dcpai-tnler,t of Comnttt.vity Devclopntent Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21381479-2139 August 4, 1592 Nls. Charlene Marquez 1785 Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Ms. Marquez, This letter is written in response to your letter dated July 10th concerning the issue of a clothesline at 1875 West Gore Creek Drive. The issue of clotheslines was raised during the most recent series of Speak-Up meetings held by the Town of Vail. Staff research irito the issue revealed no current regulations within the Town of Vail Municipal Code which prohibit the presence of clotheslines within town iimits. Additional research indicated that clotheslines are prohibited by neighborhood covenants in many areas throughout town, but these covenants are not enforced by the Town of Vail. It is possible that the appearance of clotheslines could be reviewed by the Design Fieview board, but it is not currently required. If you have any other questions concerning this issue, please do not hesitate to contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, . ' . ~ Sus n Sca lan Environmental Health Officer \Ird cc: Kristan Pritz, Director of Community Development Pam Brandmeyer, Assistanf to the Town IVlanager An Il~~ortant message from the Town of Vail and the Vafll Poflice Department.oa p Dear Resident: We need YOUR help! Together we need to make sure that Vail's neighborhoods are kept clean and safe. We need to work together and take the necessary steps to ensure our streets are clutter-free and hazardous situations are avoided. Over the years various cades, guidelines and laws have been established to maintain neighborhood quality and safety. They h~lie been established by popular demand and include the following: 1. Store and keep articles and bui'-c:ing materials out of public view on your property. All refuse and container_s must be obscured from view and not accessible to scavenging animals. This includes vehicles which c3Z'. ° 1P_ca^t ..~..ai^1..i~., n i~.~ ~ ~V~iCi. Opc^i.-~,.t1vZ'i 1iG~.ai tile:ii vWii 2. Trash must be stored in either in refuse containers or in refuse storage rooms. The containers inust have tightly fitting cover or lid. The storage rooms rciu.st bF approved by th:: building department and must not present a'fire or ::ealtl) hazard. Refuse containers may not be left along the roadside. 3. No.ise must be kept to a reasonable level. At ni.ght the saunds or music coming from your property must be kept at the level of a normal conversation. 4. Property owners should be aware that no parking is allowed on residential streets. Off street parking must be provided by the property owner. 5. Vehicles parked in plain view must be in running condition. A vehicle is considered inoperable if it cannot be movEd within a thirty day period under it own pawer. Other regulations from the Community Development Department include: 1. Building permit: A building pe.rmit is required for new consLruction. Tn ?d;%.it' ^^r a .l-DL:11d111g t.ciiTilt 1S ii2CeSS3ry IOr renovations 02' improvements to your property. If you plan to improve your property, please check with the Community Development Department as to whether or not you will need a building permit. 2. Property improvement: Most property improvement projects require design approval from the Community Development Department or the Design Review. This includes changing the color of a building. Please check with the Community Development Department as to whether or not you will require design approval. 3. Signage: Sigr.age';in, the Town of Vaii is regulated by the Vail Sign Code. This code determines size, lecation, etc. of all signs within the Town of Vail limits. Please check with the Department of Community Development before you instaall any signs. SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-22-95 ; 11:10 ; 3033287207y 3034792157;# 1/ 1 l ACI I l:f 1l INI Y 1i1111.! IINI; '0U Bk()N)WAY (ll'll(:l.l)! IIII I'.().li()XSSU iic~ntii) ()i cT)nnM1551ONkl.'S FnGU_.~:c)L(~knlx)~fi~~t i I1U:!) 3Zl1-lu~(l~; I•nx: ( :u .l~11 12117 . f.': y~.~':/r , . EAGLE COl1fVTY~ COLORA~~ MEMORANDUM 7!'Oa Town Cotaeacil Membcrs and °I°own ARarflagers Basalt Gypsvsn Eagle Arron Vail , ARaiatiarn Red Cliff FROMe The Eagle Cauaaty Boacd o¢ C..ornenicseneoers DATEo June ai, 1995 RIEe IOTO'I'ICE OF FS1 1V.A.TI(JN Eagle County's gn=ager Jack Lcwns is leaving his county jab to pursue other intereses. Mr. I.ewis will continuc un a consulting capa,city with the county over the ncace several gnonths. Iai the interian, the cmunLy s:ommissionegs have designated ¢our counry depa.etment heads to oversm wuntY operagdoms: AlHen 5artin, administratlve serviccs (970) 328-8620, Kathleen Forinash, health aaad hutxsata scrve.ses (970) 328-8840; Keieh Montag, public erorks (970) 328- 8730; and Jim Frem, aarpoat (970) 32M685. Shnuld you 6ve any questions mr need a,ssistance piease contact tkae apprapraate persorn lasted above, or calll this office at 328-8605. ¢b SENT BY:FAGLE COUNTY ; 6-22-95 ; 15:45 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 7 . . 1i1(;I.I l:( )I1N I Y IS1 1Il I)IN, i i(IU IiR()AIIWAY ( ll I I(1 f 11 fl II • . P.( I!l )X 11.'i(1 14)A1,11) (11 c'1.1h1MiStil( INI RS 1 A( -I I,!'(11()1:AI 1(1 H 16.11 I'AX: (.~U i).511{-72D7 ~~1.. ' : 41 _`r~ }C5. r.• J C00"IJNTY COLQRADO o UM. Too Michael Ga11ghex-ARenBurra l'homas Hines-Avon Kent Myers-@lail Assmiatcs Itichard Caa-nes-Ae?on Bob McIlveen-Beaverr Crk. Resort Co. Chris I"sstes-Gypsum Mike Rose-Vail George Itoussos-Eagle County ][.uggr Brommks-Avon Dal1 Kovacevich-`II'rans. Task'Force lLarry Grafel-Vail Peggy Ostterrfoss-1laifl ]cff' Shrolfl-Gypsum . 'II'om Steinberg-Vai1 Haxry T'aylor-.4von Barbara Fresquez-Ited Cliff Wilfli~ ~owcll-Fagle FROMa James 7ohnson, Eagle County . IDATEo ]une 229 1995 RIEe Transportaeion Maseer Plan Meeting Fnclosed ape the minutes of the 7une 16, meeting ue Avon_ ne ncxt Yneeting has be,en scheduled fog Friday, July 7, 8:00 a.rn., Avon Munecipal Building, Arran. SEN7' BY:EAGLE COI.JNTY ; 6-22-95'; 15.45 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 2/ 7 TRAN3PQbRTA7'QQN MA57.'F.R CONllVi 1VIEETiNG FfiVayy um II6g O99J . AvmBn MUn9Ce]lA B611lding PIeS0t1$: 1faroae.s Johnsdaa-Eagle County Daee Williams-Vai1 IDaily MichaeI Guilagher-MiYeturaa Thomas Elines-Avoaa Kent Myers-V'sifl Associates Richard Carnes-.4eon ]9ob-ARcI?veen-Beaver Cpk. Resort Co. Chras Estes-Gypsum Miko Rose-@fO GBQ$ge RULi5505-EBgI@ ~.'OUDty Mnchelle Frongclom-Avon ]Larxy Brooks-Avon Jifl9 Kovacevach-Trans_ Task Fogce June Deaae.-Eagle County ][.arpy Grafel-Vail 1. Ogettaing . A. The ameetfng was openvd at 8:25 a.rn by Jalncs 7ohnson, Eagle CounYy . Counmissnoneg. B. ]L.arry Brooks itatroduced Michelle Frongelem vvho is now in thei8 Trannspoetation Markcting uea- U. GoaYs . A. gho Trauispor4a4ion Mastcr Plan . . b. 'd'he 1!!lasteg Plaaa as not a ballot or marketing tool. & We are settang up groand rules. b. °p'he Mas4ea Plnpa rnust bc separated from any politacal Co1flS1aCYgtioIlS. 2. "Y5}ee RRaster Plan is not $P1an of Opeaations. a. T'he Plan of Operatians wi1l be done by the Regiantl Transporta4i.on Authori4y Board. b. This Authority will consist vf one Bnember from each . maanacipality, the County and the Beaver Creek Ytesort Company. B. Tgaaspor&ation Suevey 1. The Vail Associates has the survey in progross on two levels. Surveying o4' focus groa'ps (1) Why 4$tey did or did.not vote fmr the transportation tax when is was on the ballot (2) lFocus groups to be done by July 10. SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-22-95 ; 15:46 ~ 3033287207- 3034792157;# 3! 7 TransportaYion Master Piaan Committee Mnutes, Jtne 16, 1995 Page Twu b. Telephone Suevey (1) What do the voters ausnt? . (Z) Telephone survey 8o be done by 7uly 19, c- AH 5uY'Vey riUlribeTS pT0685SCd bS? $he t7iCd dV88k 1C1 Tfllly. (fl) The suawey will give us direction an what appropriately should be funded by any proposed ballot initiative. (2) We already have com associated with lease purchasse and cash purohase from 4he second Transportation Summit. C. W'bat Do We Mean-I,eve9s of Service . 1. What Calculataons ta LTse Y.evels of Service? & iJse .S cent sales tax in our calcula8imns_ b. Which catculations will best service the needs? (fl) I.me purchase (green sheets) . (2) Cash purchase (yellow sheets) 2. W1nat does the group envision whe~sa speaking of Levels of Serrveee7 L Ceographicafl servico areas b. Psra-transit c. Maineenance facilities d. Shelters e. Dcfane defacir.ncies in the current levels of seavice. M. d„eve?s of Segvice A. Ge.ographica1 Service Aveas 1. B.eadrrelle a• EYCBSgBT9g 5BD'V1CB (1) Two anorreang soutes . (2) 'Q'wo ewening route-s (3) Ono cxclusive route run by Bcavea Creek Itesort Company b. Expandcd servvice (1) Four moming routes ycear-rocand (2) Fotar evening roeates year-round SEN'f BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-22-95 ; 15:46 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 4/ 7 T'ranspoakation Masteff PBaai Commnt4ee MmuYes, June 16, 1995 IPage 'Il'hree . 2. Red CBeffMn4urga I. Exis4ing seavice-none b. lProposed service • (I) Tfrnro morning routes year-round (2) Two cvening rouYes year-rouad (3) Cominu4er routes on 20 passenger people movers . (4) Possible expansion 4o accornmodate evening work hours and restaurant patrons. 3. Eagle-@Jail ai. Exlstang sorvace-none b. Proposed service .(1) Co1lccYoir routes ustiaag 20 passenger people movers year- rourad (2) U.S. ffighway 6 rou4c oxparided to accoiaatnodate Eagle- Vail circul$tor routes. 4. Awon L Existeaag service , (1) Express roaite (Z) Coaamuter (3) seasonal b. Expanded service , Express a'oute (2) Dcstination stops . (3) year-lYbuild 5B6d1C8 S_ ]Edevards a_ 1Exusteng service (1) P$rk axd Ytide (2) I~ghway 6 Express rouge b. Expandec9 service (Il) kiaghway 6 commuteg route year-round , (2) ]Eioanestead and other area subdivision colloctor routes usietg peaple movers. . (3) Par8c and dtide facilify 6. Wolcott L Existing servvace-none b_ Pgoposed service-Park and Ride Facfli4y SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-22-95'; 15:46 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 5/ 7 b TrunsporIIataon Master Plan Cornm'attee Adinu4es9 Jugae 16, 1995 Pago 1Foiar ' 7_ IEagle . a. Exis4ieeg service (1) Park and Ride Fac:iliey (2) 'II'wo morning soutes-Eagle/Cxypsuln Express - (3) 'g'wm evening routes-Eagle/Ciypsum F-xpress (4) Seasonal service b. Exparaded service (1) Park ac?d Itide Facility (2) Foue moming roiates-Eagle/~'vypsum Ecpaess (3) Foue evrening routes-Eagle/Gypsum Express (4) Yeu-round serwir-e S- GypsuaBt Existing service (1) Paak and dtide Facilegy (2) 'II'wo axeoaning rou4es-Eag1e/Gypsum E%press (3) Tvvo evening routes -Bagle/Gypsum Express (4) Seasonal service b. lExpaeaded service (1) Park sead Rida Facilityy , (Z) Four naorning routes-Eagle/Gypsum Express (3) Foue everting routes-Eagle/6rypsuna Express • (4) Year-round service 9. Bagle Coeanty Ikcgional Aieport a. ]Existing servlce-none b. Prroposed service (1) Park and Ride Facili4y (2) Employee service (3) ATo coBnmercial servico 10. Dotsero a. ]Existing servece-none b. Proposed service (1) Paek and Ri de Facality (2) Four envming routes-extension af Pagle/Gypsum Express (3) Four evcning routes-extension of Eagle/Gypsum Express (4) Year-round service SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-22-95 ; 15:47 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 6/ 7 > 'lCranspostatiora Ma.sgeg PIlan Comanifltoo Mmutes, dune 16, 1993 Pago Fabe _ 1 Y. BasaltlE? Jebel & ExesQang servicc-RF'd'A service b. Expanded seivice (l) RFfi'A service (2) Tax enoney generated iaa this area to go for existang oc expanded RIFTA seavices og teails. 12. Vffiil . Existing sepvico-@/TC Destinateoee Stop . . b. Esapanded service (fl) Wes4in/Lionshead (ssammeir)/Transpoatafion Center (yea- rouaacf) (Z) Other stops as needed 13_ besver Creek to @/ail . a. F-Ids¢ieag servece (1) Guest/eanployee route 4hrough Beaver Cseek then Yo Vaol. (z) Seasona9 summeir b. Expanded service (l) Resovt Coanpany we11 do feeder routa through Beavor - CIreek. (a) Regeonal Systein to East g.ot at BC, Avon, lTTC Express (3) Seven buses , (4) Becoma patt of t}ac Regional 3ystem 14. County 7'ranss4 Systeaaa Participants . a. Vai9-Wilfl continue presen¢ systom b. Awon-Wi18 continue preserat systom C. Beaeer Cseek Resort Company-VNill eontinue present systeen d. Regiona9 Transa4 Systcan-VNiI] connect comma,nities ared present Sys4ems. B. Maintenaaace lFaculities Il_ Presen4l.ocations a. Rlail Transpostmion Center b. 7fowm of Avmn 2. Possible Satellite Locateons a. g.emdwille . . 1b. Vicinity of EagiB Coauaty liZegional Aarpore SEN'f BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 6-22-95 ; 15:47 ; 3033287207- 3434792157;# 7/ 7 0 Transpoa-taion Master Plan Comaraettee Mnutes, pianC 16, 1995 . Pago Six C. Paa$-Tsansn4 1. 2,400 hoa,rs budgeted the firse ye$r of regional sarvice. 2. 730 houffs ewery yeu after inigial sgart aip yea,v, . 3. ADA c~omp&eance standards to be inet_ D. OBheP 1. Shelterrs-safe, secuee, wcll-lighted. 2. Addtess growth proble8ns pertaining 4o bus system. 3. Address environmentai concereis. IV. Reguonal Transpoat-ataoaa Riu4homtg, A. Represeae4a4amn fl. MuesicipaliYies-one each . 2. Deaver Creek Rewrt Company-one 3. EagUo Coteaat}r-one D. Timelines 1. Each geoaap to be aepeesented to subanit a nominee's name to the County Comaaaissioners' O1fice by June 30. 2. A Rosolu4ion for Yhc Authority and appointing it members vvill be ors the Jtely 11 Bagle Cotenty Commissioners Meeting Agerada. V. Next Mee4aaag A. The Trail5pOS4at3011 Mut@8 ~lai1,C0YmY¢fEY$8e will rileet On: July 7, 1995 8_00 iLm. 4o 12:00 aa00n Adoaa Maanicipal Building, Alvoaa B. ]E81ie Cmy1 wi18 pi-osent the Bikc Path Coenponent for considesation. C. County s8aff M01 provede deBnographic dnfonnataon aaed a conccpt plari for the Regaona) Tiransporqation Bus Systean. dd d~ TO ~ff OF VAIL 75 South F'rontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970 479-2100 - FAX-970-479-2157 IFOR INBIVdEDBATE 9iELEASE June 23, 1995 Contact: IRod Gifford, Public Service Co. (719) 486-6515 GAS MA9N ONSTAL(~AT80N CAUSES TEnAPORARY BBICE PATH CLOSIJRE 9fV LDONS@iEAD AR~A JUNE 26-28; ALTERBVATE ROIJTES VVILL BE PROV6DED (Vail)--There will be yet another construction project in Vail next week. However, the gas main installation project by Public Service Co. vuill be short-lived. llVhile contractors install a gas main to upgrade service for the expansion of Eagles Nest on Vail Mountain, a one-third mile section of the recreational bike path through Lionshead will be temporary closed from West Forest Road to the Lionshead Niall. The bike path closure is scheduled from 7 a.m. Nionday (6-26) to 7 p.m. 1lVednesday (6-28). Public Service Co. will install orange detour signs at key intersections to reroute bike path users around the closure. For additional questions or more information about the project, please contact Rod Gifford with Public Service Co. at (719) 486-6515, or 390-3555 cellular. # # # dd e4 TO~r OF vAIL 75 South F'rontage Itoad Yail, Colorado 81657 970 479-2100 - FAX-970-479-2157 FOR IMflflED9ATE RELEASE June 23, 1995 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office BUILDBNG PERMITS BSSIJED BY THE TOVVIV OF VAIL The following building permits have been issued or applied to the Towri of Vail Community Development Department for the period June 9 to June 22: Schwartz, 1187 Vail Valley Drive, remodel, $51,000, Alleman Construction, Inc. Sudbrink, 1670 Sunbursf Drive, remodel, $16,000, Jeff Lutz Builders. 333 Trust, 17 Vail Road #4, addition/remodel, $37,000, Creative Design Services. Town of Vail, 580 South Frontage Road East (tennis building), remodel, $1,500, Achelpohl Consfiruction. Hofiday House Association, 9 Vail Road, alteration, $5,000, Holiday House Condominium Association. Ying, 486 Forest Road, remodel/addifiion, $281,000, Boymer Construction/Cont. . Innstead Limited Partnership, 421 Beaver Dam Road, new construction, Woodstone Homes, Inc. Berman, 933 Red Sandstone Road, deck repair, $3,000, Berman. iViont de Neige Holdings, Ltd., 3025 Booth Falls Road, addition, $42,000, R.A. Nelson & Associates. Brooktree 221 D Par4nership, 970 Vail View Drive, reroof, $16,000, fVlaster Sealers, Inc. Ogilby, Lodges at Timber Creek, new residence, $550,000, S.H. Cole Construction Co. (more) Building Permits/Add 1 Newton, 442 South Frontage Road #A &#B, reroof two buildings, $49,985, B & R Roofing. Jardis, 1395 Westhaven Drive, 250 addition, $42,000, Hiland Construction. . AM Bros. Development, Inc., Innsbruck Meadows #6, new residence, $140,000, Snowshoe Development. Chamonix Chalets Condo Assoc., 2456 Chamonix Road, reroof, $32,000, Snowcap Roofing. Stork, 2605 Davos Trail, reroof, $2,000, Sherman Construction. Flowers, 4572 Meadow Drive, window addition, $1,900, Sherman Construction. Village Inn Condominium Assoc., 68 IVleadow Drive, awning, $6,445, Dilligaf, Inc. HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., 715 West Lionshead Circle, addition, $15,000, Maximum Comfort Pool & Spa. Buffehr Creek Home Owners Assoc., 1885 Buffehr Creek Road, reroof, $15,300, CFP Enterprises. # # # TOW N OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Department of Community Development Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-21381479-2139 FAX 970-479-2452 . June 22, 1995 Ms. Roni Telmosse 5420 Renaissance Avenue San Diego, CA 92 ] 22 _ RE: Vail Va11ey 1vledical Center's Proposed Mobile Catheter Lab Dear IVis. TcL~nosse: Thank you for yot:r letter dated June 8, 1995 expressing your concerns about the proposed mobile lab, .Your input is very helpful to the Town staff, advisory boards and Town Council. To answer your questions about additional opportunities to participate in the decision-making on this proposal, a worksession will be held by the Town's Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) on Monday, June 26 at 2:00 p.rn. A public hearing will be scheduled sometime after that meeting. Two individuals who are active un this issue on the neighborhood level are Joan Norris on behalf of Skaal Hus (970-476-3250) and Jim Lamont on behalf of the East Village Homeowners Association (970-827-5680). Dan Feene.y at the Vail Valley Medical Center (970- 479-7271 ) is most helpful. We will share your letter with the PEC on Juine 26 and will inform you of the dates of future meetings. If you have specific questions for Town staff, please contact Randy Stouder at 970- 479-2138. Tbank you for your interest. Very truly yours, an Connelly Director of Community Development xc: -4own Council Planning and Enviroumental Commissian Tom Moorhead } Pam Brandmeyer Randy Stouder RECYCLED PAPER June 8, 1995 21 10 Vail Town Council IOu 75 South Frontage Vail, Colorado 81657 SUBJECT: Medical Center Mobile Lab Port Dear Council Members, As owners of Unit #202, Scorpio Condoininiums on West Meadow Drive, we are particularly, concerned about the Medical Center Mobile Lab Port being considered by the Town Council at this time. Although we understand the importance of diagnostic equipment for area residents, we question if this is the appropriate location of this facility. A major docking port of this magnitude hardly is in keeping with the residential environment of this area. Considering heart surgery is not conducted at the Medical Center and it is not anticipated that there is sufficient local need to permanently house the lab in the building, another location not within a residential area of the village makes more sense. Also, once the docking port is in, other uses for it are available to the Medical Center. We already have noise from the Frontage Road and don't want the possibility of adding more. A permanent docking port for a 60' long 15' high semi-truck trailer has commercial/industrial elements incompatible with residential environment. This is not the appropriate location for the catherization lab and/or any other truck-trailer usage. We urge you to consider the negative effect upon the character of the area and impact on property values, as you proceed with your review of this conditional use permit application. Please advise the scheduled date for public hearing on this issue. We also are interested in attending any neighborhood meeting prior to the Town Council's public hearing, and would 'c.~'-'PT°clute bei::g udV1s2G1 Of th° Sa^:° , SO w@ CaT: I?:a}{? '.~~ldT1S t^ rP present. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and concerns and your response to this letter. Sincerely, elmosse 5420 Renaissance Avenue San Diego, CA 92122 (619) 756-3795 Fax (619) 756-9591 cc: Ken Barber, Rawhide Company East Village Homeowners Association • ~l'j ~ - - - - r'..v'"'"~`.,:,:~•~ ";i;~~ EAGLE COU""iTY, COLORAnO June 20, 1995 Town of Vail The Honorable Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Peggy: At the Transportation Worksession on Tuesday, 7une 6, it was agreed that the Regional Bus System would be managed by an Authority of appointed members. Each municipality in the County would appoint one member, the Beaver Creek Resort Company would 'appoint one representative and Eagle County Government would appoint one person to the Authority. At the 1Vlaster Plan Committee 1VTeeting on Friday, June 16, it was agreed that the Authority should be appointed by 7uly 11. We are asking that each entity send or ca11 with the name of their appointee for the. Authority ' by Friday, June 30. A Resolution appointing the Authority will be on the County Commissioners' agenda Tuesday, July 11, 1995. Please notify Jzm~ J)eane at the County Commissioners' Office, 328-8605 or Fax 328-7207 with the .name of your nominee. Sincerely, EAGLE COUIVTY COXMSSIOIVERS ~ s E. , r Cseorge A. Gates Johnnette Phillips Chairman Commissioner Commissioner jd