HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-09-05 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETI~~
TUESDAY, SEPTEfVIBEFi 5, 1995
7:30 P.M. EN TOV COIJIVC9L CHA?fVIBERS
REV9SED AGEIVDA
1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
2. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of August 1 and 15, 1995.
B. Approval of modification of previously granted sign variance request for Curtin Hill
Sports, located at 254 Bridge StreeULot 1, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Jack Curtin.
3. Presentation to Jim Shearer - Award of Appreciation.
4. Discussion of Vail Commons Issues.
5. Ordinance IVo. 13, Series of 1995, an ordinance amending the Charter of the Town of Vail,
Colorado to protect Designated Open Space.
6. Resolution No. 21, Series of 1995, a resolution amending the Town of Vail Deferreci
Compensation Plan.
7. Resolution No. 22, Series of 1995, a resolution approving and adopting the acceptance of
a settlement agreement and release in Civil Action No. 93-CV-88, the Town of Vail vs.
Chevron USA, Inc. and Amoco Oil Co.
8. Ordinance IVo. 12, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting
Ordinance IVo. 8, Series of 1995, to provide changes to Area D requirements for SDD No.
4 that concern the development plans for the Glen Lyon Office Building site (GLOB); and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
9. Town Manager's Report.
10. Adjournment.
N0TE UPCOIViIIVG NIEIETING STe4RT TIfVIES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWIV COIJIVCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
VUILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/12/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
7HE FOLLOVVING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
VUILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/19/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IM TOV COUMCIL CHA?MBERS.
THE IVEXT VAIL TOVI/N COUIVCIL REGI?LAR EVENIIVG NIEE7ING
NVIL.L BE OIV TUESDAY, 9/19195, BEGINNING ,4T 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
C:\P,GENDA.TC
~
VAIL TOWN COUIVCIL
EVEIVIIVG MEETIIVG
TIDESDAV, SEPTEMBEF3 5, 1995
7:30 P.M. @N TOV COIiiVC9L CHAfVIBEFBS
REVISED EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1: Citizen Participation.
7:35 P.M. 2. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of August 1 and 15, 1995.
B. Approval of modification of a previously granted sign variance
request for Curtin Hill Sports, located at 254 Bridge Street/Lot 1,
Block 5-C, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Jack Curtin.
7:40 P.M. 3. Presentation to Jim Shearer - Award of Appreciation.
7:45 P.M. 4. Discussion of Vail Commons issues.
Andy Knudtsen
8:30 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance repealing
Randy Stouder and reenacting Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1995, to provide changes to Area
D requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for the
Glen Lyon Office Building site (GLOB); and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance fVo.
12, Series of 1995, on 1 st reading.
BACKGROUIVD RATIONALE: The Glen Lyon Partnership wishes to
abandon plans to develop a micro-brewery at the current site of the Glen
Lyon Office Building. Instead, they wish to proceed with an expansion of the
existing office building and parking lot. The office building is located within
the Area D of SDD#4. Any changes to the approved plans constitutes a
major amendment to the SDD and requires ordinance approval by Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Both the PEC and staff have reviewed the
proposed office expansion and recommend conditional approval.
9:30 P.M. 6. Ordinance iVo. 13, Series of 1995, an ordinance amending the Charter of the
Tom Moorhead Town of Vail, Colorado to protect Designated Open Space.
10:15 P.M. 7. Resolution No. 21, Series of 1995, a resolution amending the Town of Vail
Steve Thompson Deferred Compensation Plan.
10:25 P.M. 8. Resolution IVo. 22, Series of 1995, a resolution approving and authorizing the
Tom Moorhead acceptance of a settlement agreement and release in Civil Action No. 93-CV-
88, the Town of Vail vs. Chevron USA, Inc. and Amoco Oil Co.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The settlement agreement and release
provides for an equitable resolution of a cause of action brought by the Town
against Chevron and Amoco for an alleged release of petroleum products
stored on the Chevron/Amoco property onto the Old Town Shop lot. The
agreement provides that Chevron will be responsible for remediation of the
groundwater contamination. The Town will take the responsibility to provide
any remediation required of any soil contamination.
RECOMMEIVDATION OF STAFF: Authorize approval of settlement
agreement and release.
10:35 P.M. 9. Town Manager's Report.
10:40 P.M. 10. Adjournment.
1\ t
N0TE UPCOVViVNG MEETING START TIf1AES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
I I I I I I I
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COl9NCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIOiV
VI/ILL BE ON TUESDi4Y, 9/12/95, BEGINNIIVG AT 2:00 P.M. IIV TOV COUNCIL CHAl1ABERS.
1'HE FOLL011VIRlG VAIL 70WRf COUNCIL REGIJLAR WORK SESSION
VUILL BE ON 7l?ESDi4V, 9/19/95, BEGINIVING AT 2:00 P.M. IfV TOV COUNCIL CHAIVIBERS.
THE IVEXT VAIL TOWN C09JNCIL REGULAR EVEiVING MEETING
VUILL BE ON T99ESDAY, 8/19/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHANiBERS.
IIIIIII
C:WGENDA.TCE
VAIL TOVVN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
T9.DESDAV, SEPTEflABER 5, '9995
7:30 P.M. 0N TOV COUNCIL CBiAAABERS
AGENDA
1. CITIZEiV PARTICIPATIOfV. °
2. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of August 1 and 15, 1995.
3. Presentation to Jim Shearer - Award of Appreciation.
4. Discussion of Vail Commons Issues.
5. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting
Ordinance IVo. 8, Series of 1995, to provide changes to Area D requirements for SDD IVo.
4 that concern the development plans for the Glen Lyon Office Building site (GLOB); and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
6. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1995, an ordinance amending the Charter of the Town of Vail,
Colorado to protect Designated Open Space.
7. Resolution No. 21, Series of 1995, a resolution amending the Town of Vail Deferred
Compensation Plan.
8. Resolution IVo. 22, Series of 1995, a resolution approving and adopting the acceptance of
a settlement agreement and release in Civil Action No. 93-CV-88, the Town of Vail vs.
Chevron USA, Inc. and Amoco Oil Co.
9. A request for modifications to conditions of approval of a previously granted sign variance
request for Curtin Hill Sports, located at 254 Bridge StreeULot 1, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1 st
Filing. Applicant: Jack Curtin.
10. Town IVlanager's Report.
11. Adjournment.
NOTE IDPCOMONG MEETBf1BG START T6MES BEL01nl:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
I I I I I I I
THE NEX'T VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAFi lIVORK SESSION
lIUILL BIE ON TUESDAV, 9/92/95, BEGIIdNIIVG A7 2:00 P.NN IN TOV COUIVCIL. CHANABEFiS.
T'HE FOLLOWINCa VAIL 70NVN COUNCIL RECalDLr4F3 liVOR6f SESSION
lNILL BE ON TUESD.4Y, 9/99/95, BEGIYVNING AT 2:00 P.M IN TO!/ COUNCIL CHAnABERS.
THE NEXY VAIL TOliVN COUNCIL REGQ.DLAR E!/EiVING IVIEETING
NVILL BE ON TUESDAV, 9/19/95, BEGINNING Al' 7:30 P.flN IN TOl1 COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
C:WGENDA.TC
VAIL TOWIV COUiVCIL
EVENING MEETING
. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1995
7:30 P.M. 9N TOV COUiVC9L CHAMBEF3S
EXPANDED AGEnIDA . 7:30 P.M. 1. Citizen Participation.
7:35 P.M. 2. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of August 1 and 15, 1995.
7:40 P.M. 3. Presentation to Jim Shearer - Award of Appreciation.
7:45 P.M. 4: Discussion of Vail Commons issues.
Andy Knudtsen
8:30 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance repealing
Randy Stouder and reenacting Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1995, to provide changes to Area
D requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for the
Glen Lyon Office Building site (GLOB); and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUfVCIL: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
12, Series of 1995, on 1 st reading.
BACKGROUIVD RATIONALE: The Glen Lyon Partnership wishes to
abandon plans to develop a micro-brewery at the current site of the Glen
Lyon Office Building. Instead, they wish to proceed with an expansion of the
existing office building and parking lot. The office building is located within
the Area D of SDD#4. Any changes to the approved plans constitutes a
major amendment to the SDD and requires ordinance approval by Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Both the PEC and staff have reviewed the
proposed office expansion and recommend conditional approval. 9:30 P.M. 6. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1995, an ordinance amending the Charter of the
Tom Moorhead Town of Vail, Colorado to protect Designated Open Space.
10:15 P.M. 7. Resolution No. 21, Series of 1995, a resolution amending the Town of Vail
Steve Thompson Deferred Compensation Plan.
10:25 P.M. 8. Resolution No. 22, Series of 1995, a resolution approving and authorizing the
Tom IVloorhead acceptance of a settlement agreement and release in Civil Action No. 93-CV-
88, the Town of Vail vs. Chevron USA, Inc. and Amoco Oil Co.
BACKGROUND RATIOIVALE: The settlement agreement and release
provides for an equitable resolution of a cause of action brought by the Town
against Chevron and Amoco for an alleged release of petroleum products
stored on the Chevron/Amoco property onto the Oid Town Shop lot. The
agreement provides that Chevron will be responsible for remediation of the
groundwater contamination. The Town will take the responsibility to provide
dny remediation requirea or any son contamination.
RECOMMEiVDATIOiV OF STAFF: Authorize approval of settlement
agreement and release.
10:35 P.M. 9. A request for modifications to conditions of approval of a previously granted
Randy Stouder sign variance request for Curtin Hill Sports, located at 254 Bridge StreeULot
1, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Jack Curtin.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, deny, or modify the request.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On Aprii 6, 1994, the DRB reviewed a sign
variance request to allow for a third business identification sign at Curtin Hill
Sports. The DRB imposed several conditions on the approval
recommendation. The applicant has complied with all the conditions except
#3a. The applicant returned to the DRB on August 16, 1995 to request that
Condition 3a be remaved. The DRB agreed to remove the condition and is
now forwarding a recommendation for approval of the requested sign
variance to Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the requested variance.
10:55 P.M. 10. Town NYanager's Report. 11:00 P.M. 11. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPRO7(IMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/12/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWW COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIOfV
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/19/95, BEGIiVNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN C09JNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 8h9/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
CWGENDA.TCE
S
VUORK SESSION FOLLOUV-UP
TOPIC QvEST90NS FOLLOW-UP S09.UT90NS
1995
10/19 SNOW STORAGE LAND PURCHASE LARRY/BOB McL: Immediately pursue purchase from VA of Current discussions presume a decision an 6 months (April'95). VA has
current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres asked to dump snow at this location. Ber;ause of our environmental liability,
adjacent to the west. this request was denied, Larry, Bob, and Tom are following up. Joe Macy
was in to see Larry again this week. Has taken the lease to VA attorneys to
address environmental liability issue.
02/15 CHUCK ANDERSON YOUTH PAUUJAN: Contact VRD about moving up the selection Paul sent another letter to all county educ;ators requesting appropriate
AWARD process to allow awards to be given during May PRIOR to criteria for formaton of this scholarship prugram.
(request: Strauch) gratluation or to be includetl with the graduation ceremonies.
05123 EHU/EHU/COMMERCIAUEHU TONi; Council directed Town Attorney to prepare an Tom will be corresponding with both Holy Cross Electric and Public Service
EXEMPTIONS ordinance which would require all employee housing units in Company.
the Town to adhere to all ortlinances, rules and regulations in
effect as may be amended from time to time. •
TOM/SUSAN: Council would like to explore a formula which _ would require employee housing units within commercial
development projects based on the percentage of full time
equivalent employees associated with the project.
TOM/BOB: Council agreed to pursue an idea by Merv Lapin
in which residents of employee housing units, such as the
future Vail Commons project, could be exempt from franchise
fees collected b utilities to retluce the cost of housin .
05/23 NEWSPAPER BOXES BOB: Council reiterated its interest in consolidating Bob will meet with newspapers re: locations. The etem uvull be set for the
newspaper boxes on public properry in the commercial core 9/12/95 NlS.
areas and asked Town Manager to share an action plan at its ~
next meetin .
06/06 BUILDING PERNiIT FEES SUSAN: Merv Lapin wandered how we monitor accuracy of Susan is preparing a memorandum to be delivered to Council on 9/5/95 at
builtling violations by applicant. (What is originally declared the Community Development Work Sessic>n.
and assessed vs. as built .
September 1, 1995 Page 1 of 1
THE TOVI/IV OF VADL
GU9DELINES FOR TYPE A-EMPLOYEE HOl9SIP1G U1N6rS .
• Effect6ve Allay 2, 1995 ,
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of the Type A Employee Housing Unit is to enable individuals to purchase primary
residences within the Town of Vail. One of the goals of the deed restrictions is that the residence
be owner occupied. Renting the residence is allowed in extenuating circumstances only, as .
described in Section IV below. Additional information pertaining to the Type A Employee
Housing Unit deed restrictions can be found in the Type A Employee Housing Unit "Occupancy
and Resale Deed Restriction and Agreement" (deed restriction).
The purpose of the Type A Guidelines is to set forth the requirements and restrictions for those
existing dwelling units throughout the Town of Vail that are purchased via the mortgage
guarantee program, the rnortgage credit certificate program, or the dwelling units created by the
Town, such as Vail Commons Village. These programs and developments are available
individually or can be combined by potential homeowners. At the time of closing, if any program
or product has been utilized, the owner must sign the Type A deed restriction which will run with
the property in perpetuity.
II. RESALE RESTRICTIOIdS
In the event that-an owner desires to sell the Type A Employee Housing Unit, the owner may do
• so provided that the resale price and prospective purchaser meet the standards of the Type A
Guidelines and deed restriction. Resale price may not exceed:
A. The original price;
B. Plus an increment equal to 3% per annum of the said purchase price from the
date of purchase (prorated at the rate of 0.25% for each whole month of any part
of any year); •
C. Plus the value of capital improvements (including professional fees) made to the
Employee Housing Unit not exceeding 10% of the original purchase price. For
every ten years from the date of original purchase and deed restriction, another
ten percent of the purchase price may be added to the value of the property for
capital improvements;
, D. Plus the value of any special assessments made by a homeowner's association or
by a local government that have been paid by the owner.
Additional details regarding resale value as well as calculation methods are provided in the deed
restriction.
III. PURCHASE CR(TERIA
Individuals desiring to purchase an employee housing unit shall receive preference and be
prioritized according to the order of the criteria listed below. Units with the highest offers of equal amounts and equal priority status shatl be placed in a lottery which will be held within a reasonable amount of time following the deadline for bids.
A. Highest offered price below or equal to stated maximum. The Housing Authority,
Town of Vail or owner reserves the right to reject any and all offers. In addition,
the Town may set a minimum offer price, below which no offers will be accepted.
F:\everyone\andy\admin\guidlin.vi ~
B. Individuals vuith the longest consecutive record of employment within the Town of
Vail boundaries.
C. Individuals with the longest consecutive record of residency within the Town of
Vail boundaries.
D. Individuals who reside and are employed outside the Town of Vail boundaries but
inside Eagle County.
E. Employers who may purchase a unit specifically for employees of a Vail business.
W. OCCUPA~~~ ~~QUOREIUiEPJTS
Once a Type A Employee Housing Unit has been purchased, it must continue to be occupied in a
manner which is consistent with the goals and policies of the Town of Vail Housing Program.
The Type A Employee Housing Unit must be owner occupied by:
oAn employee, vvorking in Eagle Counry vvho works a minimum of thirty hours per vveek,
and the employee's spouse and children.
oA retired individual, sixty years or older, who has uvorked a minimum of five years in
. Eagle County for a minimum of thirty hours per week, and his or her spouse and children.
Other regulations pertaining to occupancy are as fotlows:
A. A leave of absence may be granted for one year, subject to clear and convincing
evidence which shovus a reason for leaving and a commitment to return to the
Vail/Eagle County area may be approved by the Town. Said evidence shall be in
written form presented to the Town 30 days prior leaving for review and
recommendations. The Leave of Absence shall be for one year and may, at the
discretion of the Town, be extended for one year, but in no event shall it exceed
tvvo years. The unit must be rented during said year or years to residents who
" comply vuith occupancy requirements. Rental periods shall not be less than 30
days. After verification and qualification of tenant(s), a copy of the .executed lease
shall be furnished to the Town.
B. If the Type A Employee Housing lJnit is listed for sale and the owner must
relocate to another area, the unit may, upon approval of the Town, be rented to
residents who comply with the occupancy requirements. ,4 letter must be sent to
the Vail Housing Authority requesting permission to rent the unit until sold. A
minimum six (6) month written lease must be provided to the tenants with a sixty
(60) day move out clause upon notification that the unit is sold.
C. Co-signers may be allowed but shall not occupy the unit unless the occupancy
requirements of 4his section are met.
D. If an individual owns a local residence wrhen purchasing an employee housing unit, the individual must agree to restrict the residence as a Type A Employee
Housing Unit as provided in the deed restrictions or sell the residence. The
residence must be listed for sale within ninety days of purchasing the employee
tiousing unit and must be sold within one year of closing.
F:\everyone\andy\admin\guidlin.vi 2
E. If an individual owns vacant land within Eagle County when purchasing an
employee housing unit, as soon as the land is improved with a residence, the
individual must sell the employee housing unit or agree to restrict the new unit as
a Type A employee housing unit, as provided for in the deed restrictions.
, V. ANNUAL VERIFBG4TION AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION
A. No later than February 1 st of each year, the owner of the restricted employee
housing unit shall submit two copies of a report, on a form to be obtained from the
Community Development Department, to the Town of Vail Housing Authority and
the Town of Vail Community Development Department verifying that the dwelling
unit continues to be owner occupied, that it.has been occupied in accordance with
Section IV of these guidelines; that the occupant has worked thirty hours per
week for the previous year, and where the occupant has worked.
B. If the Town determines that there has been a violation of the occupancy
- standards, the owner of the restricted employee housing unit shall be found to be
in noncompliance. Penalties the Town may assess against the owner include
eliminating.resale gain and/or penalties found in the Town of Vail Municipal Code
Section 1.01.100. Any misrepresentation by an applicant in submittal material
' shall disqualify the applicant. VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMEIVTS
The applicant shall provide, upon request by the Town, the following documentation as proof of
residency, employment and income:
A: Federal Income Tax return forms. Applicant must provide the last four (4) years of
Federal Income Tax Returns, an audited financial statement, or acceptable
documentation to the Town. _
B. Verification of current employment or job commitment in Vail or Eagle County (i.e.,
- wage stubs, employer name, address and phone number or other appropriate
_ documentation as.requested by the Town).
C. Landlord verification (proof of residency, physical address).
D. Valid Colorado Driver's License (address, issue date).
E. Voter registration. Please note that individuals must register as Vail voters within
thirty days of closing. .
F. Deposits for down payment shall be verified by the holder of such funds.
G. Any co-ownership interest other than joint tenancy or tenancy-in-common must be
approved by the Town.
H. Signed authorization from the applicant allowing the Town of Vail to discuss
details with applicant's employer.
F:\everyone\andy\admin\guidlin.vi 3
g .
I. Any documentation which the Town.deems necessary to make a determination.
!/DU. FORECLOSURE
The Town of Vail (the "Town") may, pursuant to an agreement entered into in connection
with any first lien deed of trust or mortgage to be secured by the afifordable housing unit,
agree to release and waive their ability to enforce the resale restrictions contained herein,
in the event of foreclosure, provided that such agreement grants to the Town Council and
Authority, the option to acquire the affordable housing unit within 30 days after the '
expiration of the statutory redemption period for an option price not to exceed the
redemption price on the last day of the redemption period.
The following option provisions shall be included in loan documents, or in a separate ~
agreement entered into in connection with loan documents, and shall be executed by the
lender, the Town Council, and the Authority.
In the event of a foreclosure by the holder (including assigns of the holder) of.the
promissory note secured by a first deed of trust or mortgage on the affordable housing
unit, and subject to the issuance of a public trustee's or sheriff's deed to the holder
following the expiration of the borrower's redemption rights, the Housing Authority of the
' Town of Vail ("Authority") and the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado (the "Tovun
Council") shall have the option to purchase the affordable housing unit uvhich shall be
exercised in the following manner:
A. Notice. The holder shall give notice to the Authority and the Town Council
that a certificate of purchase with respect to the affordable housing unit
has been issued to said holder by the Public Trustee of Eagle County.
Such notice will be given writhin 10 days of the issuance of the certificate.
fVotice shall be deemed given upon being placed in the U.S. Niail, First-
, class postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:
Town Manager, Town of.Vail ~
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Chairman, Housing Authority of the Town of Vail
' 75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657 , B. First Option. The Town Council shall have 15 days after the expiration of .
the borrower's statutory right to redeem in which to exercise its option by
tendering to the holder, in cash or certified funds, an amount equal to the
redemption price which would have been required of the borrower on the
last day of the redemption period.
C. Second Option. The Authority shall have 15 days after the expiration of
the Town Council's option as set forth above to exercise its option to
purchase the affordable housing unit by tendering to the holder, in cash or
certified funds an amount equal to the redemption price which the
F:\everyone\andy~admin\guidlin.vi 4
,f
i
borrower would have been required to pay on the last day of the
redemption period.
D. Title. Upon receipt of the option price, the holder shall deliver to either the
Authority or the Town Council a special warranty deed, conveying the
property to either the Authority or the Town Council. Title shall be
merchantable, free and clear of liens and encumbrances which would
render title unmerchantable.
In the event that neither the Authority or the Town Council exercise their
respective options as provided above, the Authority and the Town Council
shall cause to be recorded in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of
Eagle County, a fult and complete release of the covenants restricting
such unit to Affordable Housing use which appear in said records in Book (
) Page Such release shall be placed of record within three days
after demand therefore by the holder following the expiration of the ,
options.
1
F:\everyone\andy~admin\guidlin.vi 5
a
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager FROM: Andy 6Cnudtsen, Vail Commons Manager
DATE: August 25, 1995
SUBJECT: Design and Site Planning Guidelines for the 1lVest Vail Commercial Area.
After vualking the site with architects and developers, Town staff has generated the follouving
design elements to be included in a Design and Site Planning Guideline (hereafter "Design
Guidelines") document for the VVest Vail Commercial area.
0. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The scope of the Design Guidelines includes most of tMe commercial properties in West Vail.
The boundaries of the Master Plan run from the Vail das Schone Building on the easY side 4o the
1lVendy's property on the west side, including what is referred to as the Hud 1Nirth site behind Texaco. It does not include the Vail Commons site, as the current site plan for that property
already has been generated in response to a thorough analysis of the area context, as described
in the Vail Commons Request for Proposals, and includes the design elements listed below.
The primary purpose of the "Design and Site Planning Guidelines " is to study the functions
between and among the properties and to make the area uvork more efficiently. For example, the
plan should coordinate automobile, pedestrian and bicycle traffic between these sites and the
surrounding areas. A secondary goal is to improve the aesthetics of the commercial area. The
perimeter of this commercial area should be improved in a coordinated, high quality fashion.
Creating a better visual relationship between the commercial area and the surrounding
residential area is a priority for the residents of the area. Architectural uniformity is not a goal of
the guidelines. Limited analysis and recommendations pertaining to general massing and basic
architectural elements are desired. The guidelines will not include studies of uses and/or specific
architectural treatments. The desired goal of the guidelines is to set forth a road map that will
guide future development in order to create a cohesive, highly functional, attractive commercial
area. ~
uu. PRocEss
A. Public Input and Plan Development
The Towrn is directing the lead architecUplanner to interview each primary landowner in
the area. In addition, we are directing that the lead architecUplanner conduct a minimum
of one public meeting for the neighborhood to attend, in which residents can understand
the scope of the work, revievu basic concepts for the guidelines, and make suggestions to
the architecUplanner as to the direction the plan should take. After these meetings have
been completed, the lead architect will generate the design guidelines document
according to the format listed below, addressing the design elements listed belowr.
i:\everyonelandy\commons\vwmp.728 1
~ .
B. Public Review and Approval
Once an initial document has been drafted, pubfic review will occur follows:
1. PEC / Town Council worksession - October / November
2. PEC formal recommendation - .
3. Town Council worksession - November / December
4. Town Council adoption by resolution -
Modifications to the draft document will reflect the comments made by the Planning and
Environmental Commission, the Town Council members, and members of the public who
attend the public hearings.
III. DESIGN ELEMENTS A. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
1. Provide a continuous internal pedestrian access way from the West Vail
Lodge, through McDonalds, West Vail Mall, Safeway and Vail das Schone,
to City Market. f
2. Study needs and opportunities for an external sidewalk from the Wendy's
site to Vail das Schone.
3. Provide access points from the commercial improvements to the north into
the residential area. Identify the existing routes to make the plan as
responsive as possible to the existing use patterns of the area. A key
parcel on the north side of the study area is the Hud/Wirth site. Determine
how future development on this site can facilitate efficient pedestrian
access. _
, 4. Provide a sidewalk along the south side of Chamonix. .
5. Include bus stops at appropriate locations.
6. List pros & cons of the various elements which could be included in the
Frontage Road right-of-way. The decisions involve detached/attached
bike lanes or bike path and detached/attached sidewalks.
B. AUTOMOBILE CIRCULATION 1. Improve the interior automobile access. There should be a continuous
automobile lane adjacent to the commercial improvements, as well as
adjacent to the southern property line. The purpose is to provide a route
for drivers to easily move from one property to another, without entering ,
the Frontage Road.
2. Unify the layout of parking aisles and parking spaces.
3. Coordinate the aisle system to prevent "dead end" aisles.
4.. Create a soluiion for the drive-up bank on the Vail das Schone property
that works with the automobile circulation around it.
f:leveryone\andy\commons\wvmp.728 2
f
/
a
5. Appropriately locate access points on the Frontage Road. Evaluate the
efficiency, number, and location of existing curb cuts.
6. Identify uvhere loading and delivery should occur. Describe how it shoutd
be buffered.
7. Explore opportunities for shared parking.
8. Identify uvhere structured parking should be located.
9. ,4ccommodate emergency access, where needed.
C. BICYCLE CONNECTIONS
1. Plan a hard surface path which separates from the Frontage Road,
crosses Buffehr Creek Park, passes the rear of the Brandess Building, and
works its vuay through the Vail Commons site Yo Chamonix Lane.
2. Evaluate the pro's and con's of a detached bike path or attached bike
lanes in the Frontage Road right-of-way.
D. FROIVTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMEfVTS
The design of the Frontage Road should be completed by a Civil Engineering firm. The
Town is looking for the elements listed below to be designed in conjunction with the
design guidelines.
1. Design a center left turn lane, from the Vail Commons property to the
VVest Vail 4-wray stop. _
2. Delineate the edge of existing and proposed pavement and edge of right-
of-way line for the length of the improvements listed in #1.
3. Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, bike lanes, and
acceleration/deceleration lanes adjacent to the Vail Commons property.
The specific recommendation for ihese improvements are as followrs:
Two 12 foot through lanes;
One 14 foot center turn lane,
A 12 foot acceleration/deceleration lane,
. Two 6 foot paved shoulder/bike lanes,
An 8 foot detached bike path/sidewalk,
Accommodation for all storm water flows with a curb and gutter
and storm sewer system. r
4. Identify the amount of landscaping to be included in the right-of-way
(please note the CDOT will have to approve).
5. Design the necessary drainage improvements. These may include an
extended curb and gutter-system, a belouv grade storm sewer, or an
integration of curb and gutter with the existing ditch system. 6Ceep in mind that the study area and design area may exceed the boundaries of Yhe
area to be improved. Existing drainage systems in particular must be
integrated with the proposed solutions. i:\everyone\andy\commons\vwmp.728 3
r
~
E. LANDSCAPING
1. Design a berm along the Frontage Road screening the parking lots from
the Interstate and Frontage Road. Please be sure to indicate the height,
slope and width of the berm as well as the number of plantings.
2. Automobile entrance elements. The Town has discussed stone entry
features, set into berms, to be placed on either side of each entry. We are
anticipating simple, metal letters to be set into the stone. Staff will be
verifying the sign code allowances for this type of signage.
3. Identify the potential for {ocating landscaping within the interior of the
existing and proposed parking lots.
4. Anticipate removing or relocating the landscaping area, or a portion of it,
between the West Vail Mall and Safeway.
5. Identify the existing landscaping in,front of the commercial improvements.
Advise as to if it should be relocated, removed, or augmented.
, 6.- Include landscape islands within parking lots to delineate access ways.
F. OTHER
The miscellaneous items requiring design standards include:
1. Trash enclosures.
2. Roof top mechanical.
3. Re-cycling centers.
4. Bus stops.
5. Lighting elements. Be sure to select a fully cut off fixture:
6. Newspaper box enclosures.
7. Snow removal/snow storage.
G. RESIDENTIAL ELEMENTS
1. Plan for an entrance element on Chamonix for the West Vail
neighborhood. Please explore this idea; what do you think the best
location for that is and what it might look like?
H. ARCHITECTURE "
1. Explore the pros and cons for uniform architectural treatment. Elements
such as color, materials, awnings, signage, and roof treatments should be
considered. Basic architectural standards for buildings may need to be
developed. For example, flat versus pitched roofs are the types of
architectural elements which must be prescribed in the design guidelines.
f:\everyone\andy\c6mmons\wvmp.728 4
s
r
v
W. FORMAT
The Design Guidelines should include both written and graphic components. The graphic
component wili be a base map and the written component will be the design considerations.
The base map should build on the information Town Staff has provided. Staff has compiled all of
the sunreys in the area and put it together on a 24" X 72" drawing. The final product should be
made up of two boards of 24" X 36" each. The plan should be general in nature and include both
existing and proposed conditions. These should be clearly depicted on the base map, to be _
easily understood by the Town Council, staff, and developers wrho will be using them in the
future. In addition to large scale design solutions shown on the base map, the master plan
should identify specific areas needing improvement. These should correlate by number to
detailed solutions in the design considerations, which are explained in more deYail below.
The design considerations should have twro parts. The first should be general standards that will
apply to all of the properties in the area. These standards should include text and simple
graphics that proscribe solutions for details such as 4rash enclosures or roof 4op mechanical
equipment. These are the types of elements which every developer will encounter on each site
and which warrant uniform solutions.
The second section of the considerations should be area-specific desian solutions. When a
specific area requires a unique solution, a section of the design considerations should address it
vuith text and sketches. Each solution should correlate back to the base map uvith the numbered
system.
. .
f:\everyone\andy\commons\wvmp.728 rj `
RECEIVED AUG 1 6 1395 po~5
UML Colorado Munidpal League
1650 I,incoln Street, 5uite 2100 o Desnnver, Colorado 80264-2101 o Phone (303) 831-6411, FAx (303) 860-8175
c,(-
f - s•4s
. lJcc,c.~ c1.a-~.~ ~ .
~O~ Mayors and Managers (or Clerks in Municipalities Which
Have no Manager) of Member Municipalities~
FItOl~e Ken Bueche, Executive Director ~
SUBJECT: Appointment to CML Policy Committee
DA'g'Eo August 14, 1995
It is again time to make appointments to the League Policy
Committee< Each member municipality of the League is entitled to
designate a representative, and all cities over 100,000 are
entitled to designate two representatives< In addition, all
Section Chairs and District Presidents are automatically appointed
as members of the Committeeo Appointments to the Policy Committee
are made each fall, and members serve for a one year period.
The Policy Committee is responsible for reviewing legislative
proposals and recommending to the League Executive Board positions
of support, opposition, no position, or amendment to a wide variety
of legislation affecting cities and towns. The Policy Committee
also proposes to the membership at each annual conference in June
revisions to the League°s policies which guide League positions on
public policy issues affecting municipalitiese
~ The Committee normally meets three times a year - before and
during the legislative session as well as in May prior to the
annual conferencee Meetings are held in Denver, usually from about
10000 a.mo t0 3:00 pomo The girst meeting this year will be held
in Denver on 6dednesday, November 8. The meeting held during the
legislative session will be February 9, also in Denver.
If your municipality desires representation in 1995-96 on this
Committee, please appoint an official - elected, appointed, or an
employee - who will be willing to take the time and effort to
serveo Please return the postcard (enclosed with the memo being
mailed to the manager or clerk) by September 29, We will then
notify Committee members oYtheir appointment and send them
background information and a notice of the first meeting.
' wS Q15•96
d
EPA_ TME/ Y T OF PUBL/ RKS &
TRANSPORTAT/ON ,
PARKI~~ STRUCTUR.~~~
[BACKGROOUND INFORMAT/OOIN
TOTAL TRANSACTIONS= 497
987
o 47% OF ALL TRANSACTIONS ARE FREE
o OPERATED 150 DAYS9 24 HOURS PER DAY
o STRUCTURES FILLED 38 TIMEV
o AY ~ ~ ~E I-ENGTI I ~ TAY ~ 5 - 7 HOV
~ ~ ~~RAGE FEE $ 7 ° ~
~ ~ 8.,~~ ~ ~ ~~~DAY
o OH URLY A lCl1VG FEE CHAIVGES llV
THREE YEARS
i
DE ARTME141 T O PUBLIC WORKS &
TR PORTAT10/ V ,
PARKING STRUCTURE5 , .
ENTERPRISE FUND
Ro $ 1y971y297 (AH Fees Co,Iected)
(EXPE NSE~
~ ~~~RATIONS $ 332'320
o MAINTENA CE
OPERATIONS $ 1,001Y886
o DEBT SERVSC~ ~ 531,737
TO TAL $ 19865,943
il
~ . _ EPARTMENT OF PU- L/ ORKS &
TR O_ ~ ~~ON . 1
. THES"R VEY SAYS!
o 650 SuU F7 et9I? s sef9 U t out
o 165 ~~sponded m 25/ f~~~~rn ratM
12 options ~r~~opos .
DD l1 ~v
o 74% said keep 1 112 hour free
~ 55% said keep 6 - 9 omo free
o 48% said keep Ford Park free for carpools
o 62% said keep Soc r Fie/d free
a 66 % said no to Sum er parking fee
~ 4. % Mad Fa,wab~ ~~~giramo ~
% [.eas9 Fuvmabta 19 5-96 .
O
75'/0 - _.----749'a--------------------------------------------
" S
70% ~ ~.5
bb%
(>S% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - G - ~ 4
b0'/o -=-----4--"_ - - - _ -_.--s `
3.5
~ 55% ss~a ~
~ - - - 3
~ $Q% - - - - - - - - - - -
&7%- - - - - ~---48%• ------•48%- _ - 2.5
h ' 4$% '
~ _3sx - --d-- ~ a.
~ 4o~o _ - - - - -
e__------- ~
A 3s~o - ~ 3so
31% 33% - - - - - - - - ~
a' 300/o ~ - - - _
27°Yo'---
~ 25% /.x - - " - - - s_ ;
~c - - - - - ^ - -.,e
20% _ so~Yo
- - s-----
16% E :
IS% -14"Yo 17%
'13%- - -
10%
G%
5% 4% ,
+ 3°/a ~ -
0%
30 muro. 1 lmur foee FteRuiro Chage Ya t Keay 1 1/2 Koop 6.9 p,m. Fad Park Inoro~eo car Charge $g por Trat woccr Leavc aoooer e
free patlcing. perlcnig. bueimae rnto fa [itsl 1 hovre froe free parlcing stalua yao. pool requiro- day at Boooor fiald leke Ford field se frea flN tste for
Chatgo S1... C6ergo S3 fw validetiae Coe I12 kwes... parlcing... bue nJd irnooe at Ford fio[d... Perk, free if... empbyYO sumner
1-2 hauro... 90 mim*s Stetua quo. merchmq Park_ perking psrking.
. 8ee.._ velidation.
e
C•
u'EPA RTMENT OF PUBL,C WORKS&
TRANSPORTAT,ON
PAt7 U Kl3 G STRUCTURE-
PROGRAMS AND RATES .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Q'S TA TUS 0 UO
r
,n .
e9
TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Mayor
Vai1, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157
August 21, 1995
Dear Business Owner:
As part of developing the 1996 town budget, the Uail Town Council is discussing the various proposed parking
programs and rates that affect the V'illage. and Lionshead parking structures. In that regard, we are asking for
your candid feedback and suggestions on the various parking fee and incentive proposals being considered.
Any discussion of parking programs and fees is emotional and contentious. Regardless of any final decisions, we
are sure that not everyone will be completely satisfied. Locals of course want to park for "free," and guests don't
want to feel "gouged" by rates or programs. How we balance local and guest needs is the dilemma. We want
your input.
Our request is that you take a few minutes to look at the attached questionnaire, review the options, select one
or more, or suggest some other option we should be considering. Send it back to us before Sept. 5) when we will
be discussing these options and your input at that day's council work session.
Thank you in advance for your help with this important community issue.
Sincerely,
M w:ga :et A. 101 ste rfoss,
Mayor
'II'OWN OIF VAM PARKI[N~ ~~~EY 1995
The Town of Uail is attempting to assess various parking programs and/or rate adjustments for the 4VK
1995-96 season. We invite you to participate in evaluating the various options presented below. Please keep in mind the status quo may not be an option this year. To make your views heard, just TOWN Oreturn the survey in the enclosed postage-paid envelope by Sept. 5.
1. Please rate the following options on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being "Least Favorable Option" and 5 being "Most Favorable
Option."
Least Most No
1Parking Structures Favorable Favorable Opinion
a) 30 minute free parking. Charge $1 for 31-90 minutes. Rates remain the 1 2 3 4 5 0
same as last year after 90 minutes.
b) 1 hour free parking. Charge $3 for 1 hour to 2 hours of parking. Rates 1 2 3 4 5 0
remain the same as last year after 2 hours.
c) Require business validation of parking coupon to receive 11/z hours 1 2 3 4 5 0
free parking. Businesses would have to purchase stamps to use.
Approximate cost for each stamp, $8-$10.
d) Charge $1 flat rate for first 11/2 hours of parking. All other rates 1 2 3 4 5 0
remain the same
e) Keep 11h hours free parking. Status Quo. 1 2 3 4 5 0
f) Keep 6 to 9 p.m. free parking. . 1 2 3 4 5 0
To receive free 6-9 p. m. parking, parking coupon must be validated.
Business owners must purchase required stamps. .
1Ford ]Park
g) Keep free parking at Ford Park if you park before 8 a.m. or for vehicles 1 2 3 4 5 0
with two or more occupants after 8 a.m. Continue to charge $8 per day .
if single occupant vehicle.
h) Keep free parking at Ford Park same as above, excent change vehicles 1 2 3 4 5 0
occupancy requirements from ttwo, to three or more occupants. Charge
$8 per day for vehicles with less than tbree occupants.
Soccer Field
i) Charge $8 per day at soccer field parking lot. 1 2 3 4 5 0
j) Treat soccer field lot like Ford Park, free if 2 and/or 3 occupants per 1 2 3 4 5 0
vehicle, charge $8 per day if not.
k) Leave as free employee parking. 1 2 3 4 5 0
Summer
1) Keep all existing programs and rates but charge a$2 flat rate for all 1 2 3 4 5 0
parking in the SUMMER.
2. ' a) Which of the above options would have the least impact on your cusYomers?
b) Which of the above options would have the least impact on your employees?
c) Which of the above options would have the least impact on you? 3. a) Which of the above options would have the most negative impact on your customers?
b) Which of the above options would have the most negatrve impact on your employees?
c) Which of the above options would have the most negative impact on you?
4• Other comments with regard to this issue. .
Thank you for your participation ire our research program Please return the survey in the enclosed
postage paid envelope by Sept. 5. If you have other comments or questions, please contacl the Town of Vail
Community Informataon Offace at 479-2115. ,
P9..ANN1tdG e4ND ENViRONMENTAL COFJtKR1SSION
August 28, 1995 . .
• AGENDA
* PLEASE N0TE TtiAT R90 LUtJCH liY1LL BE SERVED
Si4e Vis€ts 1:30 P.M.
- ' 9. Solar Vai!
: 2: Vail Gateway
Driver: Andy
Public Ffearincs 2:00 p.m.
; 1. A request for a Conditional Use PermiY to ailow for a new cellular phone base to be
lacated at Solar Vaii located at 501 North Frontage Road WesUPart of Lot 8, Block 2, Vaii
Potato Pa2ch.
Applicant: Larry Storms of SASI, representing Faessler Realty Company
Pianner: Randy Stouder
2. A requesf for a minor Special Development District amendment to allow for an interior
resnodel to Gateway Condominium Unit #5, 12 Vail Road/Lot N, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st
- Filing.
ApplicanY: Vail Apartments Inc. / Leo Palmos, Vail Gateway
Pfanner: George Ruther
3. A request #or a major SDD amendment, located at the Vail Athletic Club/ 352 East
. Meadovv Drive and more specifically described as follows:
A paroel ot land in Traci B, Vail Village First Fling, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, commencing at the
• Ncxiheast comer of said Tract B; thence N 79`46'00' W along the Nonheriy line of Vail Viflage, First Rling, and
along the Nonherly line of said Tract B 622.86 teet; thence S O5`26'52' 1N a distance ot 348.83 feet to the
Soudiwesl comer of ihat parcel ot land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorcied January 1 U,1966 and filed
in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, said comer also being the True Point of Beginning; thence S
79`04'08' E and along tha Souiherly line of said parcel 200.00 feet to the Southeast comer ihereoi; ihence N
62`52'00" E and along the Northerly line of ihat parcel of land described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in
1977 in ihe Eag1e County Records, a distance of 66.78 feet to the Northeasterty comer ot said parcel cf land; said
comer being on ihe 1hFesterly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road, 2s platted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; lhence N
27°33'37° W a distance af 77.37 feet atong said Westerly right=of-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89°29'22°
• W a distance of 1280 feet to the Northeasterly comer of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Paga 139 as.
recmrded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Northwesterly
26.51 feet afong ihe arc of a 37.50 feet radius curve to the lefl having a cenual angle of 40°30'00" whose chord
bea= N 53°40'00° W a distance ot 25.96 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 73°55'00" W and along said tangent .
~ 66.44 teet; thence PJ 85`10'21 ° W a dislance of 50.40-feet to the Northwesteriy comer of ihe Mounlain Haus
Parcel; thence S 02`18100" W and along the easterly line oi said Mountain Naus Parcel a distance of 100.00 feet to
ihe: Southeasteriy comer thereof; thence S 45°13'53' E a distance ot 38.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning,
~ conMaining 30,486 square feet, more or less. .
~ ApPlicantm J1MT 9987 Vail Limifed Partnership, (d/b/a Vail Athletic C(ub), represented
- by Stan Cope and Michael Barclay
Pfanner. Mike MolGca
TABLED UNTlL SEF'TEMBER 25y 1995
- y
- 4. Discussion of Community Survey. - 5. Discussion of Long Term Environmental Plans. .
- 6. DRB schedule for 1995 & 1996.
DRB Representative Jan. - Mar. 1995 Grea Amsden
= - Aprii - June 1995 Greg Moffet
July Sept. 1995 Bob Armour
Sept. - Dec. . 1995
Jan - March 1996
Aprii . - June 1996 July - Sept. 1996
Sept. - Dec. 1996
7. Councii Reports.
8. Approval of August 14, 1995 PEC minutes.
~ . , . _ , . . . .
.
. .
2
A
a~
MEMORAiVDUM
TO: Vail Touvn Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 5, 1995
SUBJECT: A request for modifications to conditions of approval of a previously granted sign
variance request for Curtin Hill Sports , located at 254 Bridge StreeULot 1, Block
5-C, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Jack Curtin
Planner: Randy Stouder
Ve DESCRIPT@0N OF THE REQIJEST The applicant is requesting a third business identification sign at Curtain Hill Sports. The
sign code allows for one sign per frontage with a maximum of fiwo signs per business.
The applicant is requesting a third business identification sign to be located on the west
side of the building, on the awning above the building entrance.
0o. BACKGE80fl9ND
Attached are two memorandums from the Community Development Department to the
Design Review Board. The first memorandum is dated August 16, 1995, and discusses a
request to delete a condition of approval that was placed on the sign variance request by
the DRB at the April 6, 1994 meeting. The second memorandum is dated April 6, 1994,
and describes the original sign variance request made by Jack Curtin on behalf of Curtin
Hill Sports. The applicant has or wilt comply with all the conditions listed, with the
exception of Condition 3a. At their meeting on August 16, 1995, the Design Revieuv
Board approved the request to delete this condition of approval. The vote was unanimous .
(5-0). VOo, RECOAAIUiEN~~~~ON
4he Desogn Rediew Boapd and Staff recornrnend tha4 the Coaanci@ appeove the
requested sign daraaruce as amended, with ttae deletion of Condition 3a. The
applicarog has aEready comp9ied with Cond"ation 2 and Cond'otion 3b, and Conei6timn 9
B'e6VEa9ffEs On$aC$.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Design Review Board _
FROM: CommEUnity Development Departrnent
DATE: August 16, 1995
SUBJECT: A request for modification to conditions of approval of a previously
granted sign variance for G~urtin Hill Sports located at 254 Bridge
StreetELot 1, Block SC, Vail Village lst Filing.
Applicant: Jack C;urtin
Plannea: Randy Stouder ,
1. BACKGROUND
On Apri16, 1994, Curtin Hill Sports approached the Design Review Board (DRB) and requested
approval of a sign variance ta allow for a third business identification sign, to be located on an
existing awning at the western entrance to the Curtin Hill Sports Building (see attached copy of
staff report to DRB). At their Apri16, 1994 meeting, the DRB decided to recommend that the
Council approve the Curtin Hil1 Sports request for a third business identification sign with the
following condirions:
1. If the applicant wishes to erect a building identification sign in the future, then one
of the three business identification signs described in the staff inemo regarding the
sign variance request must be removed. The sign to be removed shall be on the
same frontage as is chosen for the new building identification sign.
2. The applicant must bring all other signs on the properiy into compliance, i.e. the
window signs must conform to the appropriate section of the Sign Code. It was
determined at the DRB hearing that the appropriate number of window signs is six
and that the current logo signs are acceptable under the Sign Code. Thus, please
reduce the number of window signs to six.
3. Previous conditions of approval must be complied with prior to the DRB
forwarding their recommendation for approval of the sign variance to the Town
Council. Their_were two previous conditions of approval which are as follows:
a. The cut in the brick on the chimney on the west elevation must be repaired,
so it is no longer apparent that there was structure attached to the building
at this location.
1
P
b. The second floor balcony rail on the wcst elcvation of the building xnust be
repaired, even though an awning currently covers the damaged section.
The DRB recommendation for agrproval required that the applicant comply with conditions 2 and
3 above prior to ~'inal Towa Council action on thhe variance request. B'htas, staff never scheduled
this item for revievv by Couacil.
iffo l[~~~ TIQN OF ,1SEQUES
The applicarit wishes to amend the DRB conditioas of approval. Coadition 3b above has been
satisfied; the railing has been repaired underneath the existing awniag. However9 thc cut in the
brick chimney (condition 3a) on the evest elevation still remains and the applicant feels that the .
eictent and cost of the work neccssary to complete the repair of this section of chi.mney is
excessive. Thus, the appRacaint requesgs taat the DRB waive cond°ation 3a and forward their
recommendatioitn ffoe° app¢°ovaIl off the sign varaance reqa~est go tlae'I'own (Council at tha~ ~me.
111e ST.~F RECOhDEEN?ATIOl`I
Since Condition 3a was a specific condiYion imposed by the DR:B, staffwill not render a .
recommendation on this issue. If the DRB feels that condition 3a is still reasonable and
applicable, then staff would recommend that the DRB forward a recommendation for denia? of
the requested sign variance to Council at this tiffie. The applicant has stated that he simply cannot
comply with condition 3a and is willing to go to the Town Council vaith a denial recommendation
from the DRB.
P:\everyone\randy\memos\cvrt1n.0816
2
As close as it gets.
Design Review Board
Dear Members,
I am following up to last years variance approval for Curtin Hill Sports signage, as of
April 1994. I realize this was quite some time ago, but as many things are, it was put on
the `summer project lisY. T'he last letter we have from the Design Review Board (DRB)
dated April 13, 1994; stated the sign variance would be approved with certain stipulations,
and two of them were:
3.
a. The cut in the brick on the chimney west elevation must be repaired so
that it is no longer apparent that there was a structure attached at this
location.
b. T'he second floor balcony rail on the west elevation of the building must
be repaired, even though an awning currently covers the damaged section.
We have come into compliance with all the other stipulations except the above noted
conditions. The reason we have not complied is two-fold. First, we are simply a tenant
here. Second, it would take a great deal of money to fix the above mentioned items.
Money we sirnply do not have and the landlord will not provide.
Since we cannot comply with the above mentioned items, we are asking the DRB to
eliminate those conditions of approval. We are asking that our sign variance be approved
without further delay. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
• , . -
Teak Simonett Susan`Harvey
General Manager Marketing Manager
254 Bridge Street • Vail, CO 81657
(303) 476-5337 • Toll Free (303) 972-1234 • Fax (303) 476-0269
~ , .
RflEflAORAfiVD41flA
TO: Design Reviewr Board
FROM: Communify Development Departmenf ~
- DATE: April 6, 1994
SUBJECT: A sign variance request for Curtin Hili Sports located aY 254 Bridge
StreeULot 1, Block 5-C, Vail Viilage 9st Filing.
Applicant: Jack Curtin and Teak Simonetf
Planner: Randy Sfouder
~ ::,:......,.,...........r..>,,,,>,.»>„»».>„~.~.>.;:.,..»,.:>.,,,,,,,,,,,,,>w,,.>.,.•...k.,>.>.,.,
.
:.i:.:.v v . :...~•.:::.v:::::: ? ~
,~::..:.:.•:::::a::•:.:::.::..;y.;:.
~:::..:.:,:.,::•:::ti:::•::-:'•::•::•::S .............ti.ti.:'•T.:•;:. . .
~.v\~ii~:.'',::iii::{:
. . . . . .
..........~.....1..::.:
A?4:~~
L~4+vn
.
c~.4`::Y:t•:,:?t.~<~<;~::~::w:::C:;
ti;~r:.... ::.~:v:;r~'.;
...:.v:~.
'ti•:ititi::i.:i"~.'~:}•{+'~
`
. :•:•>::•:t.:~:::i:.>:•::.::~:• .
:....:.......v.~::::........ :•.v ~
~
. , , . w . ~ n ; ~ : a. ; o- ; : a u : ; : , ; : v : ; : a 3 : ~ : : a ; ; ; ; ~ : ; , ~ w . , , . , , , ~ . : » , ~ , ~ . , , ~ . , a ~ : ; ; v . ~ ~ , • . » , . : : . , . • , . , ~ : . , ; : i : ; ; : ~ : ; : , : t , a v . , ; a ; , : : ~ • : : . , w • , . : - A , ~ . , . , • ; ; ; : ~ : 'a d ~ : ; ; ; ; \ a S a, c ; v A~ • : c : a
Be DESCRIPTION OF TF1E REQIIEST •
The applicant currently has two business identification signs locafed at the northwest and
northeast corner entrances to the building. At the northwest corner, the applicant has a sign
with the words "Curtin Hill Sports and Ski Rentals" on an awning. This sign is cfassified as a
projecting sign and is 3.5 square feet in size. The sign at the northeast corner of the building
is mounted on a second story deck railing and is classified as a wall-mounted sign. This sign
is 10 square feet in size vvith the same wOrding as the awning sign.
Section 16.20.010 of the Town of Vail Sign Code states that:
"An individual business within a multi-tenant buitding may be permitted the following
signs: projec4ing anci hanging signs or wall mounted signs or any
~ combinafion 4hereof, not to exceeci a maximum number or size of sign as
designated by any one category
Section 16:20.090 and 16.20.190 of the Town of Vail Sign Code state respectively that:
"Projecting or hanging signs-Individual business within a multi-tenant bu'ilding:
D. Number, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the
business abuts, as determined by the administrator with a maximum of fvvo
signs, subject to reviewr by the Design Review Board."; and
"1lVall signs-Individual business within a multi-tenant buiading:
D. IVumber, one sign per vehicular street or major pedestrian way which the
business abuts, as determined by the administrator with a enauimurt, of 4wo
signs, subject to review by the Design Review Board."
The maximum number of signs designated in both the wall sign section'and the projecting
sign section 'is two. Thus, the applicant is aflowed a maximum of two signs for business
9~
identification purposes. As described above, the applicant currently has two business
identification signs; a wall mounted sign and a projecting sign. The applicant is requesting a
- variance from the section of the sign code cited above, to allow for a third business
_ identification sign to be located on the existing awning at the western entrance to the
building (across from the Vail Mountain Ticket Office). The proposed.sign would be 5
- square feet in size and is considered to be a projecting sign. The sign would contain the
words "Curtin Hill Sports".
II. BACKGROUfVD
On January 6, 1993, the Design Review Board (DRB) recommended that the Town Council
approve a sign variance to allow Curtin Hill Sports to exhibit three signs of up to 20 square
feet. At the time of the DRB meeting, it appears that Curtin Hitl Sports had at least four
exterior signs and up to twenty window signs. The applicant was requesting the variance to
allow for four signs to remain. Staff supported only three of the exterior signs and
recommended that the window signs be reduced to eight in number, which would be the
allowed number of window signs (two per frontage). The DRB had no preferences to which of
the exterior signs needed to be eliminated but stated that one of them must be removed and
the window signs be reduced to eight in number. The variance request was presented at the
next Town Council meeting, and the Town Council supported the staff and the DRB
recommendation to allow only three exterior signs and eight window signs at the property.
They had no preference as to which sign needed to be removed and left that up to the
applicant. The applicant stated that he wished to retain a free-standing sign, a hanging sign
and an awning sign.
Since the Town Council approval of the variance in January of 1993, the applicant has made
several changes to the signage of the property. The applicant has changed the types, sizes
and locations of the business identification signs. The applicant now proposes two projecting
signs and a wall mounted sign instead of a projecting, a hanging and a fres standing sign as
previously apProved. Since sign variances are granted based on the specific nature of each
proposal, a new sign variance is required.
II1. FINDINGS AND CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Before the Board acts on a variance application, the applicant must prove physical hardship
and the Board must find that, .
A. There are special circumstances or conditions applvinq to the land. buildinqs,
topoqraphv, veqetation, siqn structures or other matters on adiacent lots or
within the adiacent riQht-of-wav which would substantiallv restrict the
effectiveness of the siqn in question: provided, however, that such special
circumstances or conditions are uniQUe to the particular business or entemrise
to which the applicant desires to draw attention and do not apply qenerallv to all
businesses or enterprises.
Staff Response: ,
2
v
Currently, the buiiding has entrances on ail four sides, however, Curtin Hiil Sports can
be entered only from the west, north and east sides. The fourth frontage has an
en4rance to the building, but the entrance is accessed by descending down a flight of
stairs into the basemenf level of the building where Vail Ski and Boot Repair is located.
Staff believes thaf special circumstances applying to the Curtain Hill Sports restricf the
effectiveness of only two signs for business identification purposes. Specifically, the
business has three pedestrian frontages (the north, vvest ancl easf) as well as limited
frontage towards the mountain on the south. Therefore, staff feels that a maximum
number ofi fivvo signs specified in the Sign Code is not appropriate for the identification
of the building, and that a third sign should be allowed.
. B. That special circumstances were nof creafed by the applicant or anvone in privv
to the applicant.
Staff Resoonse:
It is somewhat unusual that a single business would have three frontages as does
Curtain Hill Sports. Since Curtin Hill Sports occupies the en4ire ground floor of the
building, the business also has three fo four frontages depending whether the ski stope
side is considered as a frontage. Staff feels that this section of the Variance Criteria
pertains to circumstances other than that being considered here. The applicant did not
deliberately create unusual circumstances that would allow additional signage.
C. That the orantinq of the variance will be in Qeneral harmonv with the Aurqose of
. ~ this title and will not be materiallv detrimental 4o the qersons residinp or workinq
in the vicinitv. to adiacent propertv. to the neiphborhood or to the public welfare
in Qeneral.
S4aff Response:
Staff feels that. the request for three signs is reasonable and is in harmony writh the
general purpose of the Sign Code. Staff does not believe this will be materially
detrimental to other persons or businesses residing and conducting business in the
vicinity.
D. The variance applied for does not depart from the provisions of this title anv
more than is required to identifv the aAplicanYs business or use
Staff Response:
As discussed in Section I of this memorandum, the proposed sign and the Nvo curren4
signs will meet all other provisions of the Sign Code other than the maximum number.
allowed.
?
3
V
r
- ~l
. ~ . .
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATtOfJ '
Staff is. recommending approval of the requested sign variance to allow for a third sign to be
- located on the awning at the westem entrance to the building. Staff has reviewed the size,
. location, lighting, and other characteristics of the sign and finds that the proposed signage is
. in harmony with the regu)ations contained in the Sign Code. However, staff recommends that
the following conditions be 2ddressed prior to uncovering the awning sign at the west side
entrance:
1. If the 2pplicant wishes to erect a building identiflcation sign in the future, then one
of the three business identification signs described in this memo must be removed..
The sign to be removed shall be on the same fronfage as is chosen ior the building
. identification sign. 2. A/The appiicant must bcing all other signage on the property into compliance, i.e. the
tivindow signs must conform to the appropriate section of the Sign Code.
&4#Since the applicant leases building space in the Hill Building to Vail Ski and Booi
Repair, this business's signage must also be brought into conformance with the sign
Code.
c:lran dylrr e r_-slhil is ;n. a 00 .
` ~6V-~-'~l L/"• _ . . . . , . .
~ . ' _ • . . • . - . . •
c~^~'`~I t~+,ls~ ~ r~~~%? ~ . . .
.3 . a) Cwt ~n ~ct-
~ , . .
~ y ~ . .
. , . .
- . . . ,
b
. , _
7 .
d
r'
~Ca j v
CURTIN - HILL SPOR7S CURRENTLY HAS TWO BUSINESS SIGNS ON OUR
BUILDING9 ONE ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER AWNING, AND ONE ON THE
, NORTHEAST BALCONY RAILING. THESE WERE BOTH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. WE AL50 HAVE ONE AWNING SIGN, WHICH
IS CURRENTLY COVERED UP ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDIPVG9 FACING
THE VILLAGE TICKET OFFICE.
IN NOVEMBER OF 1992, WE APPLIED FOR A SIGN VARIANCE TO ALLOW
US TO HAVE THREE SIGNS ON OUR BUILDING. AT THAT TIME WE RECEIVED
APPROUAL FOR THE AWNING SIGN W.HICH IS CURRENTLY COVERED UP, AND
TWO OTHER SIGNS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY NOT IN USE. WE REQUEST THAT
4JE BE GRANTED ANOTHER SIGN VARIANCE, WHICH WOULD APPROVE THE
USAGE OF OUR TWO CURRENT AWNING SIGNS, (APPROVED IN NOVEMBER OF
1993) , AND THE OLD AWNING SIGN, (CURRENTLY COVERED) WHICH WAS
APPROVED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SIGN VARIANCE IN NOVEMBER OF
1992. THIS WOULD GIVE US A TOTAL OF THREE SIGNS, THE SPECIFIC
DESIGNS OF WHICH HAVE ALL BEEN APPROVED, BUT AT DIFFERENT TIMES
' BY THE DESIGN REVIEW .BOARD. I HAVE TAKEN PICTURES OF RLL OF THE
SIGNS FOR YOUR REVIEW.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IN THIS RATHER CONFUSING
BUT AL50 SIMPLE REQUEST.
SINCERELY,
~ .
TEAK SIMONETT
GENERAL MANAGER / OWNER
r
. `f
, -
r
' I~ •
a
~ R
x-~=•~~'~~~i-
-
f/10 1Sl6
a 4-7k,: ~ ~ll--
~~~~~c~e~ ~P r r~~f93• ~:~af-~'~''rO.
~
1
. 0 ~ S~ ° 1' ~ ~ P.C~ ~ •
~ 1 h
,
wov4
"ol
. ~ .
V n /~~/C
W e
~
, C•1 l ~ ~ '
oo"
o P
. ~
i
. - - . . . ~
.
~ . - -
. .
~ .
. .
iViIiVUTES VAIL T01nIN COUiVCIL MEETING
AUGUST 1, 1995
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, August 1, 1995, in
the Council Chambers of the Vail fViunicipal Building. The meeting vvas called to order
at 7:30 P.M.
MEiViBERS PRESENT: Peggy OsterFoss, Mayor
- fVienr Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
Tom Steinberg
Sybill Navas
Jan Strauch
Jim Shearer
Paul Johnston
iVIEMBERS ABSENT: None
TOWiV OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Tovun Attorney
Pameta A. Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk
The fsrsg item oav the agenc@a vvas Citizen Participation of which there was none.
The second item on the agenc9a was the Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meeting of July 18, 1995. Mayor Pro-Tem Lapin asked
for a motion on the minutes. Steinberg moved to approve the minutes of July 18, 1995
with a second by fVavas. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 6-0 (Osterfoss not
present for vote).
B. Resolution iVo. 18, Series of 1995, a Resolution Declaring September 2- 4, 1995 as the
First Annual Vail Jazz Party Weekend. Howard Stone, event coordinator, thanked the
council,for this resolution in support of the First Annual Vail Jazz Party Weekend. Mayor
Osterfoss read Resolution 18, Series of 1995 in full. Johnston moved to approve
Resolution fVo. 18, Series of 1995 vvith a second by Lapin. A vote was taken and
passed unanimously, 7-0. The thBrd item on the ageruc9a was Ordinance iVo. 6, Series of 1995, first reading of an
Ordinance Amending Chapter 18.71 Additional Gross Residential Floor Area. Tom Moorhead
and Mike Mollica presented this item. Staff is recommending this item be approved. Art
Abplanalp asked Council to clear up the language regarding which dwellings must have a TCO,
possibly add "if required at the time of construction". Bob Armour likes the Ordinance, but
wants a 5 year time frame instead of 10 years. Galen Aasland stated the Ordinance is better
written than last draft, however it does not address the catastrophic loss. Strauch made a
motion to approve Ordinance fVo. 6, Series of 1995 on first reading, with the following changes -
fix the typos, change the 10 years to 5 years of time passed that the building was issued a
certificate of occupancy, redefine the dwelling units which must have a certificate of occupancy,
clarify uvhether applications should go before the Design Review Board or the Planning and
Environmental Commission, eliminate 250 eligibility for new dwelling units constructed after
IVovember 30, 1995 and address catastrophic loss with a second by Navas. A vote was taken
and passed 4-3, Strauch, Osterfoss; iVavas and Johnstnn vr,tinci in faynr a?,H chonror, I
_„~r..,,.
and Steinberg voting against.
Yhe foaarth item on the agencBa was the Town Manager's Report. The Pulis/Golf Course
Bridge project is proceeding on schedule with construction to occur this fall. The project is
funded through an 80-20 match with the state. All street projects are going well and the north
side of the roundabout will be paved next week. He is working with VA to prepare a parking
incentive program. McLaurin met with the engineer who designed the roundabout to work on a
feasibility study regarding a roundabout at the West Vail Interchange. A conceptual design
from Leif Ourston is due September 15.
Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Mintues, August 1, 1995, Page 1
Steinberg moved to go into executive session to discuss legal matters, second by Jim Shearer.
A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
There being no further business, Johnston moved to adjourn at approximately 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted, .
Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk
("Names of certain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
~
r
t
}
Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes, August 1, 1995, Page 2
~
,
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL iVlEETIiVG
AUGUST 15, 1995
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, August 15, 1995, in
the Council Chambers of the Vail Niunicipal Building. The meeting was called to order
at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESERIT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor
fVierv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
_ Sybill Navas
Jan Strauch
, Rodney E. Slifer
Paul Johnston
MEMBERS ABSERIT: Tom Steinberg TOWN OFFICIALS PRESERIT: Bob McLaurin, Tovun Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Asst. Town fVlanager
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk The ffmrs$ otem on the aglenda swearing in of the newly appointed Town Council Member,
Rodney E. Slifer. Mayor Osterfoss thanked applicants Bob Fiske, Ludwig Kurz, Greg Amsden
and E.B. Chester for their interest and support of the Town of Vail.
The second utem on $he agenda vvas Citizen Participation
Willa Scott, an activist from San Francisco is traveling the United States on three issues a)
police harassment, b) concern for global warming and c) lack of help for the homeless.
Daniel Frederick asked the Tovun Council why he has not received his building permit. He has
gone through the process and is still being denied the permit. Tom fVioorhead indicated there is
a meeting set for next Thursday to meet with Frederick. Frederick had agreed to a deed
restriction condition which he is now unwilling to meet. A transcript of the meeting is being
made. Osterfoss advised Fredrich that the Council could not respond to this issue during
Citizen Participation, and advised him to continue working through the process with staff.
The thorrd otem oa~ the agenda was the Consent Agenda:
A. Proclamation No. 3, Series of 1995 proclaiming the week of August 14, 1995
"Team Sunrise Week."
B. Resolution No. 6, Series of 1995, a resolution commending Bill Anderson for his
contribution to the Planning and Environmental Commission.
C. Resolution No. 7, Series of 1995, a resolution commending Kathy Langenwalter
for her contributions to the Planning and Environmental Commission.
D. Resolution No. 8, Series of 1995, a resolution commending Allison Lassoe for
her contributions to the Planning and Environmental Commission.
E. Resolution No. 17, Series of 1995, a resolution commending Sally Brainerd for
her contributions to the Design Review Board.
F. Resolution No. 19, Series of 1995, a resolution designating Christine B.
ni iuci aGi'1, l-Ul Ill UIICI , db an acicaiiiunai signer on tne i ovvn or vairs cnecKing
account #229-570-0037 as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances,
and the statutes of the State of Colorado.
G. Resolution No. 20, Series of 1995, a resolution designating an additional
checking account for the Town of Vail with Carol Fox, Susan Boyd; Walter
Ingram, Katie Laubengayer, and Kelly McCrae, as the designated signers on that
account, permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes
of the State of Colorado.
Vail Town Council Meeting, August 15, 1995, Page 1
A
L~
i~
1
Mayor OsterFoss read the Consent Agenda in full. Paul Johnson moved to approve the
Consent Agenda with a second by Merv Lapin. A vote was taken and passed
unanimously, 6-0. Bill Anderson, kathy. Langenwalter and Allison Lassoe were present
to receive their resolutions.
The fourth i$em on the agenda was, discussion of desired use of community building in the
Vail Commons Development. Andy Knudtsen and Susan Connelly presented this item to
council to review options such as a day care or a community meeting room, and provide
direction to the Vail Commons Development team as to the use of the community facility. Andy
Knudtsen reviewed the results of the Town survey regarding a day care center or community
center. Nancy Nottingham, who manages all the day care centers for Vail Associates and is a
member of the Eagle Valley Child Care Task Force gave the Council her recommendations as
to what would be involved in developing a day care center on this 3,000 square foot area within
the Vail Commons. Child care needs from Vail to Gypsum is growing, especially for infant care.
There are 2,000 children under the age of five years from Vail to Gypsum. Cherie Paller, from
the Resource Center and Family Center stated the Family Center is in need of space and the
proposed day care center could have great potential of shared space with other social service
providers and the Center. Nottingham thought this a great idea to share the space because it
would generate additional revenue to cover the costs. Nottingham added that 750 square foot
of fenced outdoor space would be required for a day care. Colleen McCarthy stated the
Council was not listening to the people's.desires, nor are they open to the local's ideas. At a
neighborhood meeting she attended it was important that a good sized community center be
built and the neighborhood people did not want a grocery store. She questions if there are 40-
52 kids in Vail to utilize a day care center. Nottingham responded there are enough kids to
support another day care center from parents who work in Vail, but live between Vail and
Gypsum. Dick Peterson questioned if it is the Town of Vail's responsibility to use Vail tax
dollars to supply day care for non-resident children. Nancy Rondeau asked where the
proposed West Vail Fire station would be located. Bob McLaurin responded that currently three
sites are being looked at and the Commons site is not one of them as the Fire Chief has
determined this site inappropriate. Rondeau wants to charge a higher fee to non Vail residents
utilizing the Vail child care. She would like to provide more free parking on this site and start a
park-n-ride. Lynn Fritzlin, resident of West Vail feels the traffic is at capacity and questions
adding a large commercial complex space to this congestion. She would like a large
community room. Jeff Christensen representing the Common Sense for the Vail Commons .
wants a master plan of the site first, then move ahead with getting a developer. Since the
Council is not responding to this request, his group is forced to do an initiative. Andy Knudtsen
stated they are looking at the Master Plan and how to make it work with the commercial site.
Jeff Christenson supports a day care centec, but wants the council to reconsider their position.
Martin Waldbaum wants a day care and add sufficient square footage to accommodate a
` community center on the second floor. Alice Cartright asked if the initiative process defeats the
City Market what then. Tom Moorhead stated it first needs to be determined if this is an
administrative or a legislative issue: The Council agreed to continue exploring a combination of
day care and community room uses for this site and asked staff to research size, site coverage,
cost and operational needs. Mayor Osterfoss invited all citizen to attend an upcoming work
session regarding the development of other elements of the Vail Commons project. The exact
date will be advertised in the paper. Discussion will include use of the revenue from the
development and the criteria to be used for selection of the community members who want to purchase one of the 53 homes in the proposed development.
The fifth item on the agenda was , Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1995, second reading of
an Ordinance Amending Chapter 18.71 Additional Gross Residential Floor Area. George
Ruther and Tom Moorhead presented this item for Council to approve, deny or modify
Ordinance No. 6 as presented. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1995 passed on first reading with
the following provisions: five years must have passed since the unit was issued a Certificate of
vi:cuNaocy (wnefher temporary or Tnai) or, in ihe event a Certificate of Occupancy wasnot required for use to the dwelling at the time of the completion, from the date of the original
completion and occupancy of the dwelling. We believe this addresses the issue of the
requirement for a Certificate of Occupancy. The ordinance reflects that these applications will
be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental. However, all proposals will still be required to
conform to the Design Review Guidelines. This ordinance eliminates 250 eligibility for any
dvirelling unit not in existence as of November 30, 1995 or one for which a completed Design
Review Board application for the original construction of a dwelling unit has not been accepted
by November 30, 1995. In regard to "catastrophic loss" it would be inappropriate to address
Vail Town Council Meeting, August 15, 1995, Page 2
tl
J
Q
that issue in this provision as it is properly addressed in Chapter 18.64 of the Municipal Code.
Section 18.64.090 provides that :"whenever a nonconforming use which does not conform with
the regulations for the district in which it is located or a nonconforming structure or site
improvement which does not conform with the requirements for ....density control.... is
destroyed by fire or other calamity, by act of God or by the public enemy, its use may be
resumed or the structure may be restored, provided the restoration is commenced vvithin one
year and diligently pursued to completion." This provision would pertain to any structure that
has received the benefit of 250 additional GRFA from that amount that wauld normally be
allowable within its zone district. Staff recommendation is to approve this ordinance. Tom
Moorhead stated additional language needs to be inserted regarding that the demo/rebuild is
not available for additional GRFA, demo/rebuilds must meet present zoning requirements for
GRFA. Tim Driscoe, a local attorney, representing his parents stated this ordinance
hurts people and is against the ordinance. Jan Strauch moved to approve Ordinance
No. 6, Series of 1995, on second reading with the modification that language will be
inserted stating that any single family duvelling or tvvo family dwelling v?rhich is to be
demo/rebuilt shall not be eligible for additional GRFA and the removal of the requirement of a dwelling to have received its final certificate of occupancy prior to
receiving its additional GRFA be made, with a second by Paul Johnston. A vote was
taken and passed 4-2. Lapin and Slifer voting against the motion.
The saxtta utem on $he agenda was Town Council call-up of a Design Review Board
approval of an amendment to the sign program at the West Vail Mall. Lauren VVaterton
presented this item for Council to uphold, reverse or modify the decision made by the Design
Review Board. At the request of the Subway Restaurant located in the West Vail Mall, the
West Vail Mall Corporation has applied for an amendment to the existing sign program for the
West Vail Mall. The current program requires signs to be white_wall-mounted letters, with an
allowance for the addition of a logo using corporate colors to be not greater than 20 percent of
the sign area. The West Vail Mall Corporation has requested that corporate color may be used
in 50 percent of the total sign area. On July 19, 1995, the Design Review Board approved (by a
vote of 4-1) a change to the West Vail Mall sign program, allowing the sign area for the Subway
sign to be 50 percent color and all remaining signs uvill continue to be restricted to 20 percent.
At the July 25, 1995 Town Council worksession, this item was called-up by the Town Council.
Tom Moorehead read the motion made by the DRB and stated this variance was not
appropriate because it was for one specific sign (Subway) and not for the entire West Vail sign
program. One of two choices can be made a) allow all the signs to have 50% color or b) allow
no signs at the West Vail Mall to have 50% color. Mike Arnett, Chairman for DRB indicated the
DRB wanted to allow for this one time variance for this one shop (Subway). Paul Johnston
moved to send this item back to DRB for further consideration of changing the sign program for
all West Vail Mall shops to have 50% color, second by fVavas. A vote was taken and
passed 5-1 with Johnston, Navas, Osterfoss, Lapin and Strauch voting in favor of the
motion and Slifer voting against.
The seventh otem on the agenda was appeal by an adjacent property owner, Neal Groff, of
an approval by the Design Review Board for an addition using an additional 250 square feet at
the Stevinson Residence, located at 1498 Springhill Lane/Lot 16, Block 3, Vail Valley 3rd Filing.
Lauren Waterton presented this item to Council to uphold, reverse, or modify the decision of the
DRB. At the August 2, 1995, Design Review Board meeting, the Board approved (by a vote of
4-1) an addition to the Stevinson residence, located at 1498 Springhill Lane. The adjacent
neighbor, located at 1468 Vail Valley Drive has appealed the decision to approve this
application. Waterton stated Groff is appealing this addition because it will obstruct his view of
the Gore Range. Tom fVioorhead stated the TOV does not have adopted view corridors for this
lot and there is no legal basis to intervene based on a private view. The Council must apply .
design review guidelines. Larry Eskwith, representing the Stevinson family, stated that Mr.
Grnff vUag nntifiarl nf 4hc 4iqiC I'1RR mee+;ngs Mn4 1.0 : ..r v ~...a~,vu i ? ~i' T~~ ic ' ^ . ,
~jr:.c:~ ii.ic~. is i1G
alternative spot to place this addition. The Stevinson family would like to accommodate Mr.
Groff, but there just is no practical way to do this. Neal Groff stated he had no knowledge of the
first DRB meeting and learned of the second DRB meeting the day before and wrhen Groff
spoke to Larry Stevinson, Stevinson indicated he would postpone the meeting for two weeks,
which he did not do and moved ahead with the scheduled DRB meeting. OsterFoss stated
Council has to follow DRB guidelines and there are no legal view protection lauvs for this
property. Lapin made a motion to uphold the DRB approval for the Stevinson residence
addition at 1498 Springhill Lane, second by Johnston. A vote was taken and passed 5-1
Vail Town Council Meeting, August 15, 1995, Page 3 .
i
i~
:
!
with Johnston, Navas, Osterfoss, Lapin and Siifer voting in favor and Strauch voting
against.
The eighth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. McLaurin stated he
will be attending a Cast Meeting the end of this week and'a Legislative Workshop
sponsored by the North West Colorado Council of Governments is upcoming and
anyone interested should contact Anne Wright to register. Paul Johnson wants the pay
schedule for council addressed and suggest $12,000 per.council member and $18,000
for the mayor. He would like this addressed prior to the election so we can attract more
candidates. The additional money may encourage people to apply knowing the money
would offset the cost of hiring help to cover their businesses while they attend Council
matters. McLaurin pointed out that all TOV wages have been frozen for this year. Tom Moorhead will report to the Council what the requirements are to change the pay.
There being no further business, Lapin moved to adjourn at approximately 11:05 P.M. ,
Respectfully submitted,
Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk
('Names of ceRain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
, Vail Town Council Meeting, August 15, 1995, Page 4
I
r
n
~
~ - OF3DIP9APICE NO. 92
SERIES OF 9995
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REEhIACTING ORDINANCE IVO. 8, SERIES OF 1995, TO
. PROVIDE CHANGES TO AREA D REQUIREMEPITS FOR SDD NO. 4
THAT CONCERN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE GLEN LYON OFFICE BUILDING
SITE (GLOB); AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
bUHEREAS, en Glen Lyon Office Buflding, a Colorado partnership, has
' requested an amendment to the existing Special Development District No. 4. Area AD; and
1A/HEREAS, the Planning and Environmental* Commission has recommended that certain
changes be made to Special Development District fVo. 4; and ,
lMHEREAS, the Towm Council considers that it is reasonabte, appropriate, and beneficial to
tfie Touvn and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to repeal and reenact Ordinance No.-F 8, Series
of 1993 5 to provide for such changes in Special Development District IVo. 4, Cascade Viltage.
iVOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDA?NED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOVVN OF VAIL,
COLORADO, THAT: Ordinance No.4 8, Series of 1993 5, is hereby repealed and reenacted, as follows:
Section 1 Amendm nt Pro Pdwgi Fulfill d Plannina Commission ReRort
The approval procedures described in Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code have been
fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental
Commission for an amendment to the development plan for Special Development District No. 4.
Section 2. Soer.ial DeveinQment Dicrricr Nn a
Special Development District No. 4 and the development plans therefore, are hereby
approved for the development of Special Development District No. 4 within the Town of Vail.
Section Chapter 18.46 Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, is hereby
repealed and re-enacted with amendments to read as, follows:
18.46.010 Purpose
Special Development District No. 4 is established to ensure comprehensive development and .
use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town, provide
adequate open space and recreational amenities, and promote the objectives of the Towrn of Vail
Comprehensive Plan. Special Development District No. 4 is .created to ensure that the development
density will be relatively low and suitable for the area and the viciniry in which it is situated, the
development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning
Commission, and because there are significant aspects of the Special Development District which
cannot be satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
9 '
w
_ 16.46.020 Definitions For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: '
A. "Special attraction" shail be defined as a museum, seminar or research center or
performing arts theater or cultural center.
B. "Transient residential dwelling unit or restricted dwelling unit" shall be defined as a
dwelling unit located in a multi-family dwelling that is managed as a short term rental in whiCh
all such units are operated under a singte management providing the occupants thereof
customary hotel services and facilities. A short term rentaf shall be deemed to be a rental
= for a period of time not to exceed 31 days. Each unit shall not exceed 645 square feet of
GRFA which shall indude a kitchen having a maximum of 35 square feet. The kitchen shall
be designed so that it may be lodced and separated from the rest of the unit in a closet. A
transient dwelling unit shall be accessible from common corridors, walks, or balconies
without passing through another accommodation unit, dwelling unit, or a transient residential
dwelling unit. Should such units be developed as condominiums, they shall be restricted as
' set forth in Chapter 17.26 Condominiums and Condominium Conversions. The unit shall not
be used as a permanent residence. Fractional fee ownership shall not be allowed to be
applied to transient dwelling units. For the purposes of determining allowable density per
acre, transient residential dwelling units shall be counted as one half of a dwelling unit. The
transient residential dwelling unit parking requirement shall be 0.4 space per unit plus 0.1
space per each 100 square feet of GRFA with a maximum of 1.0 space per unit. -
18.46.030 Established
A. Special Development Disfict No. 4 is established for the development on a parcel of
• land comprising 97.955 acres as more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A.
, Special Development District No. 4. and the 97.955 acres may be referred to as "SDD No.
4. '
B. The district shall consist of four separate development areas, as identified in this
ordinance consisting of the following approximate sizes:
2
~ Area Known As DeveloQment a?pg
- Acreaoe
Cascade Villaqe A 17.955
Coldstream Condominiums B 4.000
Glen Lyon Duplex Lots C 29.100
Glen Lyon Commercial Site D 1.800
Dedicated Open Space 40.400
B~~ 9.700
TOTAL 97.955
18.46.040 Development Plan-Required-Approval Procedure
A. Each development area with the exception of Development Areas A ewd-9 shall be
• subject to a single development ptan. Development Area A shall be allow?ed to have Nvo
development plans for the Cascade Club site as approved by the Town Counctl. The
UVaterford artd Comerstone sites shall be allowed one development plan each. Beyekpment
6eaneif. The developer shall have the right to proceed with the development plans or
scenarios as defined in Section 18.46.103, 1-4.
B. Amendments to SDD No. 4 shall comply with the procedures ouUined in Section
18.40.
C. Each phase of development shall require, prior to issuance of building permits,
approval of the Design Review Board in accordance with appiicable provisions of Chapter
18.52.
18.46.050 Permitted Ucec
A. Area A. Cascade Villaa
1. First floor commercial uses shall be limited to uses listed in 1824.030 A-C.
The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building that is located at
grade or street level;
2• All oiher floor levels besides first floor street level may include retail, theater,
restaurant, and office except that no professional or business office shall be located on street •
level or first floor (as defined in Section 1824.030 A of the Town of Vail zoning code in Area
A) unless it is clearly accessory to a lodge or educational institution except for an office
space having a maximum square footage of 925 square feet located on the first floor on Yhe
northwest corner of the Plaza Conference Center building;
3. Lodge;
4• Multi-family dwelling;
~ 5. Single Family duvelling;
6. Two-Family dwelling;
7. Transient residential dvuelling unit;
3
_ 8. Employee dwelling as defined in Section 18.46.220; 0
9. Cascade Club addition of a lap pool or gymnasium.
B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums
1. Twafamily dwelling;
2. Multi-family dwelling. -
C. Area C. Clpn Lyon Du Y i nfc
J
1. , Single family dwelling; . '
2. Two-family dweiling.
D. Area D. Glen Lyon Comm -r -ial Sit .
1. Business and professional offices;
2. Employee dwelling as defined in Section 18.46.220.
- 18.46.060 Conditional Uses
Conditional uses shall be reviewed per the procedures as outlined in Chapter 18.60 of the
Town of Vail zoning code.
A. Area A Cascade Villagg
1. Cascade Club addition of a wellness center not to exceed 4,500 square feet.
2. Fractional fee ownership as defined in the Town of Vail Municipal Code,
Section 18.04.135 shall be a conditional use for dwelting units in the Westhaven
multi-family dwellings. Fractional fee ownership shall not be applied to restricted
employee dwelling units or transient residen6al dwelling units. Ownership intervals =
shall not be less than five weeks.
3. Special attraction;
4. Ski lifts;
5. Public park and recFeational facilities;
6. Major arcades with no frontage on any public way, street, walkway or mall
area. B. Area B. Coldstream Gondominiums
1: Public parlc and recreational facilities;
2. Ski lifts.
C. Area G. Glen Lyon Dul2lex Lota
1. Public park and recreational facilities; •
2. Ski lifts.
4
D. Area D. Glen Lyon Gommercial Site
1.
- 1. Retail
a. R@staUP8P1Y aP1d BaP
3. Multi-family Dwellinp
18.46.070 • Accessorv Usec
A. Area A. Gascade Villapg .
1. AAinor arcade.
2. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in
accordance writh the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190.
3. Attached garages or carports, private greenhouses, svvimming pools, tennis
courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental.to permitted
residential uses. 4. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional
uses, and necessary for the operation thereof.
5. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreational facilities
customarily incidental to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary to the
operation thereof.
B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums -
1. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in .
accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.56.130 through 18.58.190.
, 2• Attached garages or carports, private greenhouses, swimming pools, termis
courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted
residential uses.
3• Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional
uses, and necessary for the operation thereof.
4. Swimming pools, tennis court5, patios or other recreational facilities
customarily incidental to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary to the
operation thereof.
C. Area G Clen L,yon Du I x ots
1. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190.
5
e
_ 2• Attached garages oc carports, private greenhouses, swimming pools, tennis y
courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted
residential uses.
3. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional
uses, and necessary for the operation thereof.
D. Area D. Glen Lyon Gommercial Sit .
, 1. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190.
2. Attached garages or carports, private greenhouses, swimming pools, tennis
courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to-Wntittee}
conditional residential uses.
3. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional
uses, and necessary for the operation thereof.
4. Minor arcade.
18.46.080 t ocation of Business Activitv
A. All offices, businesses, and services permitted by Sections 18.46.050 through
18.46.070 shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted
unenclosed parking or loading areas, and the outdoor display of goods.
B. The area to be used for ouidoor display must be located directly in front of the
establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property: -
Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by
outdoor display. ~ 18.46.090 D _nsi --Dwelling Unirc
The number of dwelling units shall not exceed the following:
A. Area A Gascade Villaae
In Area A, a minimum of three hundred fifry-two (352) accommodation or transient
dwelling units and a maximum of ninety-four dwelling units as defined by the tables in
Section 18.46.103 for a total density of two hundred sevenry (270) dwelling units. B. Area B. Coldstream Condomini um~
Sixty-five (65) dwelling units
C. Area C. Glen Lyon Du I x o+c
One-hundred four (104) dwelling units.
D. Area D. Glen Lyon Commercial Site
6
p _ 4• g ti mts, Two ef whi mployee dweIling units as defined by the
table in Section 18.46.1 03F.
18.46.100 Densi --Floor Area -
A. Area A. Cascade Villaae
The gross residentlal floor area (GRFA) for all buildings shall not exceed 289,945
square feet. B. Area S. Coldstr eam Condominium~
Sixry-five thousand square feet (65,000 s.f.) GRFA.
C. Area C. Glen Lyon Du Y i nrc • •
GRFA shall be calculated for each lot per Section 18.13.080 densiry control,4 and
B for the Primary/Secondary district of the Town of Vail municipal code.
D. Area D. Glen Lyon Gommercial Site
. . Subject 40 4he Employee 9iousing QDn14
restrictions in effect at time of cons4ruc4ion as ou4lined in Chap4er 98.57 of Yhe Zoning
Code.
18.46.102 Commercial Sauarp Footaae
A. Area A. Gascade Villaa
Area A shall not exceed 35,698 square feet of commercial area. Commercial uses
•include retail, office, theater, restaurant, uses listed in Secbon 18.46.050 A-1, and the special
attraciion use.
B. Area D. Glen Lyon Comm .rriai SirP
Area D shall not exceed 16;789 23,998 gross square feet of office fo:Phase
& 11 er 15,584 Swqtiafe feet ef offiee le. Phousace ~111 and shall be cons4rucYed per the approved
appeoved
development ptans. 18.46.103 Develooment Stabcrirc for Area A CacradP Village and Area D Clpn i yon
Commercial Site
7
. CMART 1: Area A Completed Projects
RetaiU Sqwre OrFSne Caseaue Swawe
. AUs DUS GRFA Canrtterda! Faot Parkuig pad"
MILLRACE I 16 20.000- 20 000
MILLRACE 11 . t4 17,53~ ~r 0.00
MILLRACE IV
' 6 10,~50 !9 0:00 •
. WESTIN 108 55.457 0.00 115
Aliredo's
- 104 SeYts Cate 71 Saets
LMIO St" 1250
Pepi SP-S 2.491
W 8 H Smith. Vaumot 900 .
CMC BUIIDING Caatada Wing _ 8 15.870 0.00 16
Clancys 1.600 0.00 13.3
. Thealer 4220 28
College Gasuroams 0.00 40
College Office - 0.00 4
TheateNMeetmg Hoom ?J 1.387 0.00 /1 S
TERRACE WMG
Rooms 720 58.069 0.00 105
Retail -
, 5.856 0.00 20
PLA2A 1
. Rooms 20 7205 0.00 16 Retail
1•099 0.00 4
PLAZA II
~ference
0.00 35
Retail
925 0.00 3
CASCADE CIUB
Retail
300 0.00 1
Bar d RawaWom 252 0.00 3S
Offiee in CMC 828 0.00 3
WellneasCenter 1,386 0.00 J
Oflice in Club 420 0.00 1.4
TOTALS 288AU " M DU 0184,58S 19,179 , 72
"'For the purposes of calculating GRFA for the CosgnN parcel (Millrace IV), no credils shall be given except }or 300 s.f. to be albwed
fa eaeh enqosed parking apace, per.Seclion 13.46210(c)(5)G) . .
.8
.rO CHART 2:
PROPOSED PROJECTS '
cauceaa
sq.~~o ondec, svueeave
1. COANERSTOWE AU or TR D11 GRF4 Comnmrdel Finat Psrhft parfcim
unrts 64 TR 28.119 53
. Empbyee Units' 3 1.800 11.100 3
' Retail 11.100
37
. . TQTALLS 64 n1 70.110 11,100 93
MEN=
2 WATEAFOqD
. Unns 27 56
Empbyee tkiits 2 1,100 p
' TOTALS ~ L47 gpp 58
~
S. V7E37HAVEA1
cowoamiMuDas
. uniu 20 22SOo
40
Empbyee Unns (Maz a). 10 6.400 . . pp
TOTALS p 2Zqpp . so
4. OQUlraw III
Unr° 3 6,450 7
TOTALS 3 6460 7
5. Cmarady Cq& AddItlon
scenarw 1(Wellness Cemer) 4.500 22S -
or
. Saenario 2 (Gymnasium) 4.500 0
TOTALS
' So311360 1 4,500
. . Seonorio 2 4 500 2Es' .
6. Ptora ONieo" 925 .
TOTAL DAAHIWUtA3"' 84 TR SO 104560 16525 0.300 210
292 . .
'Empbyee Units shalt nm count toeiard denmty w GRFA tor the purpose of this SDD
"Plaza sPaCO lias aMeady been coumetl fa a ratait parking requiremem. The new parkmg requirement ia basad on tha diflerence benaemn tlq romil
and offico peritirg reqLniemerns.
•"Tmal figuras repreaeM higFqsl aermity end commercial epaca soenarios.
9
CHART 3: AREA A
REOUIRED PARKING Parking for Completed Projects per Chart 1 in Parking Spaces
Cascade Parking Structure • . 426.7
Proposed Projects w/ req. parking in the Cascade Parking Structure:
Scenario 1- Wellness Center 22.5
OR
Scenario 2 - Gymnasium 0.0
Plaza Oifice 07
Subtotal • - 449.9
Less 17.5% Mixed-Use Credit _78 7
Total Required Parking at Build-Out of Area A
in Cascade Structure 371.2
Existing Parking in Cascade Structure 421.0
Required Parking in Cascade Structure at
Buitd-Out of Area A
With 17.5% mixed-use credit 371 2
10
18.46.104 pevelonment Planc_
Site specific development plans are approved for Area A and Area D. The developmenT
plans for Area A are comprised of those plans submitted by Vail Ventures, Ltd. and other
developers. The development plans for Area D are comprised of those plans submitted by the
Glen Lyon Office Building, a Colorado Partnership approered by the PEC August 94, 9995. The
following documents comprise the devetopment plan for the SDD as a wrhole, Waterford,
Comerstone, Cascade Club Addition Scenario 1 and 2, RAillrace IV, and Area D-Glen Lyon
Commercial Site and is not all inclusive:
1. Waterford, Sheet #L-2, dated 11-12-92, Landscape Plan, Dennis Anderson.
2• Waterford, Sheet #1.1, dated 11-13-92, Site/Grading Plan Gwathmey, Pratt,
Schultz.
3. Waterford, Sheet #2.1, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 38/43' 3", Gwathmey, Pratt,
Schuhz.
4. Waterford, Sheet #2.2, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 48'-6"/53'-0", Gwathmey, Pratt, .
Schultz.
5. Waterford, Sheet #2.3, dated 11-13-92 Plan Level 59'-0J64'-3" by Gavathmey,
Pratt, Schultz.
6. Waterford, Sheet #2.4, dated 11-4-92, Plan Level 69'-6"/74'-9", Gduathmey, Pratt,
SChultz. •
7. Waterford, Sheet #2.5, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 80'-0"/85'-3" Gwathmey, Pratt,
Schultz.
' S. Waterford, Sheei #2.6, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 90'-6" Gwathmey, Pratt,
Schultz. .
9. . Waterford, Sheet #2.7, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 101'-0" Garathmey, Pratt,
Schultz.
10. Waterford, Sheet #2.8, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 111'-6" Gwathmey, Pratt, -
SChultz.
11. Waterford, Sheet OY2.9, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 122'-0" Gwathmey, Pratt,
Schultz.
; 12. Waterford, Sheet #2.10, dated 12-14-92, Roof Plan All Levels Gwathmey, PraYt,.
Schultz.
13. Waterford, Sheet #3.1, dated 11-13-92, Elevations Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. .
14. Waterford, Sheet t13.2, dated 11-13-92, Elevations, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz.
15. Waterford, Sheet #4.1, dated 11-4-92, Sections Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz.
16. Waterford, Sheet #4.2, dated 11-4-92,. Sections, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. .
17. Waterford, Sheet #4.3, dated 11-4-92, Sections, Gwrathmey, Pratt, Schuftz.
18. Waterford, Sheet #9.1, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz.
19. Waterford, Sheet #9.2, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans, Gwrathmey; Pratt, Schultz.
20. Waterford, Sheet #9.3, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz.
21. Waterford, Sheet #9.4, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz.
22. Waterford, Sheet #9.5, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz.
23. Cornerstone, Sheet #L-1, dated 11-13-92, Landscape Plan Dennis Anderson.
24. Cornerstone, Sheet #1, dated 12-21-92, Cascade Village AAaster Plan Gwathmey, .
Pratt, Schultz.
19
_ 25. Comerstone, Sheet 4t2, dated 12-29-92, Floor Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schuttz.
26. Comerstone, Sheet #3, dated 12-29-92, Floor Plans, Gwathmey. Pratt. Schultz.
Schultz. '
27. Comerstane, Sheet #4, dated 12-21-92, Elevations Gwathmey, Pratt, Schuftz.
28. Cornerstone, Sheet #5, dated 11-13-92, Site Plan/Grading Plan, Gwathmey, Pratt,
SChultz.
29. Cascade Club Addition Site Plan, Roma, 10/10/88.
30. Cascade Club Floor Plan, Roma, 10/10/88.
. 31. Millrace III, Sheet #1, dated 5/6/93, Site Plan, Steven James Riden: .
32. Milirace III, Sheet #2, dated 4/13/93, Floor Plans for Single Family Residence,
Steven James Riden.
- 33. Millrace III, Sheet #3, dated 5/6/93, Etevations for Single Family Residence,
Steven James Riden. 34. Millrace III, Sheets #4 and #5, dated 3/20/93, Floor Plans for Duplex Building,
Steven James Riden.
35. Millrace III, Sheets #6 and #7, dated 5/6/93, Elevations for Duplex Building,
Steven James Riden.
36. Millrace III, Sheet L1, dated 5/6/93, Site/Landscape Plan, Steven James Riden.
- 37. Millrace IV, Scenario I, a/k/a Cosgriff Parcel, Site Pfan, Amold Gwathmey Pratt,
10/28l91.
38. Millrace IV, Scenario I, a/Wa Cosgriff Parcel, Elevations Amold Gwathmey Pratt,
10/22/91.
39. Miltrace IV, Scenario I, a/k/a Cosgriff Parcel, Floor Plans Arnold Gwathmey Pratt,
10/23/91.
40. Millrace IV, Scenario I, a/Wa Cosgriff Parcel, Landscape Plan, Dennis Anderson
Associates.
41. Cosgriff Parcel, Survey, Alpine Engineering, Inc., 10/31/91 stamped. 42. Survey, a part of Cascade Village, Eagle Valley Engineering, Leland Lechner,
6/8/87.
43. Site Coverage Anatysis, Eagle Valley Engineering, 10/10/88.
44. Cascatde Village Special Development District Amendment and Environmental
Impact Report: Peter Jamar Associates, tnc., revised 11/22/88.
45. The Ruins, site plan, Kathy Langenwalter, AIA, 1/16/95.
46. The Ruins, basement and first floor plans. Kathy Langenwalter, AlA 1l16/95.
47. The Ruins, second and third floor plans, Kathy Langenwalter, AIA 1/16/95..
48. The Ruins, elevations and fourth floor plan, Kathy Langenwalter, AIA 1/16/95.
49. The Ruins, elevations, Kathy Langenwatter, AIA, 1/16/95.
50. The Ruins, Survey, Duane Feheinger, 12/1l94.
51. The Ruins, Landscape Plan, Land Designs by Ellison, 2/2/95.
' A maximum of 1000 sq. ft. of common area, in addition to the approved plans, may be
added to the Waterford project to allow for compliance with the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Fire Code and American Disabilities Act. The staff shall review all such additions
to ensure that they are required by such codes.
12
• . 52. ShooY 9- EuiSBing Condi4ions Site P'lan; Pierce, Segerborp & Spaeh Archl4ec4$;
9/5/95.
53. Shee4s 2& 3- Proposed Site Plan; Pierce, Segerberg & Spaeh Archi4ec4s; 9/5/95,
54. Sheets 4& 6-Proposed and ExisYing Floor Plans, Pierce Segergerg & Spaeh
. Architects, 9/5/95. . 55. Shee4 6- Eleva4ions and.Sections; Pierce, Segerberg & Spaeh Aechitectt; 9/5/95.
56. Shee4s 11 & 92 - Landscape Plans; Dennis Anderson dAssociates; 9/5/95.
.___ti, vcicv ~,crn ~ n~.,.,',,v., ~
~'~+ac~~
, ,
W4.
• ,-tJ8f:rdaf" 6, 87
. 18.46.110 Devetopment Standards
The development standards set out in Sections 18.46.120 through 18.46.180 are
approved by the Town Council. These standards shall be incorporated into the approved
development plan pertinent to each development area to protect the integrity of the development .
of SDD No. 4. They are minimum development standards and shall apply unless more restrictive
13
standards are incorporated in the approved development plan which is adopted by the Tovm J
Council.
18.46.120 Setbacks _
A. Area A. Cascade Village
Required setbacks shall be as indicated in each development plan with a
minimum setbadc on the periphery of the properry of not less than twenry feet, with the
exception that the setback requirement adjacent to the existing Cascade parking
structure/athletic club building shall be two feet as approved on February 8, 1982, by the
• Planning and•Environmental Commission. All buildings shall maintain a 50 foot stream
setbadc from Gore Creek. The'Watertord building shall maintain a minimum 20 foot
setback from the north edge of the recreational path along Gore Creek. .
- B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiumc
Required setbadcs shall be as indicated on the development plan.
- C. Area C. Glen Lyon Du I x ot
Required setbacks shall be govemed by Section 18.13.060 Setbacks of the
Primary/Secondary zone district of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. .
D. Area D. Clen Lyon Gommercial Site
. Required setbadcs shall be as indicated on the approved deveiopment plans.
18.46.140 Heaht
A. For the purposes of SDD No. 4 calculations of height, height shall mean the
distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more
restrictive), at any given point to the top of a flat roof, or mansard roof, or to the highest
ridge line of a sloping. roof unless otherwise specified in approved development plan drawings.
B. Area A. Cascade Villaae
1. The maximum height for the Westin Hotel, CMC Learning Center, Terrace -
_ Wing, Plaza Conference Building and Cascade Parking Structure/Athletic Club is
71 feet.
- 2. Cornerstone Building: Maximum height of 71 feet.
3. Watertord Building: Maximum height of feet as measured from finished
grade to any portion of the roof along the north elevation shall be 55' (South
Frontage Road), 56' along the west elevation Westhaven Drive, and 65 feet along .
the south and east elevation as measured from finished grade.
4. WesYhaven Building: A maximum of 55 feet.
5. Millrace III: A maximum of 36 feet. 6. Millrace IV: A maximum of 36 feet.
7. Cascade Club Addition: A maximum of 26 feet.
8. Cascade Entry Tower: A maximum of 36 feet.
, 9. The remainder of buildings in Area A shall have a maximum height of 48
feet.
C. Area B. Coldstream GondominiumS
The maximum height shall be 48 feet.
D. Area C. Glen Lyon DQI.x otc
The maximum height shall be 33 feet for a sloping roof and 30 feet for a flat or
14
mansard roof.
E. Area D
4tv . Glen Lvon Commercial Site . Heigh4 limitations shall be as indicated on 4he
approved devGlopmen4 plans. On the perimeter of the building for Area D, height is
measured from exis4ing or finished grade up to any point of the roof, arhichever yielc9s _
4he greates4 height. On the interior area of any buitding, height is measured from
existing grade up to the highest point of the roof. ..i}o
eens
18.46.160 Site Coveraae
In Areas A and B, no more than 35°k of the total site area shall be covered by buildings,
provided, if any portion of the area is developed as an institutional or educational center, 45% of
. the area may be covered unless othenwise indicated on the site specific devetopment plans. 'In
Area C, no more than 25% of the total site area shall be covered by buildings, unless the more
restrictive standards of Chapter 18.69 of the Vail AAunicipal Code apply. In Area D, no more than
37% 8.3% of the total site area shall be covered by building.s _
18.46.170 Landscanina
At least the following percentages of the total development area shall be landscaped as
provided in the development plan. This shall include retention of natural landscape, if
appropriate. Areas A and B, fifry percent, and in Areas C and D, sixry percent, of the area shall
be landscaped unless othenvvise indicated on the site specific development plans.
18.46.180 Parkinq and Loaci)na
A. Area A. Cascade Villaae .
1. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52,
except that 75% of the required parking in Area A shall be located writhin a parking
structure or buildings with the exception of AAillrace IV, Scenario I, where 66.6% of _
required parking shall be enclosed in a building. If the development table in
Section 18.46.103 is amended, the parking requirements shall be amended
accordingly.
2. There shall be a total of 421 spaces in the main Cascade Club parking
structure. A 17.5 percent mixed-use credit per the Town of Vail parking code,
Section 18.52.20 has been applied to the total number of required parking spaces
in the Cascade structure. , 3. There shall be a total of 58 on-site parking spaces on the Waterford
building site with a minimum of 75% of the required space Iocated below grade.
No mixed use credit shall be applied to this site.
4. There shall be a minimum of 93 enclosed parking spaces located urithin
the Cornerstone building with 37 of the required spaces available to the public for
short-term parking. No mixed use credit has been applied to this lot.
5. The third floor of the Cascade parking structure shall not be used to meet
any parking requirements for accommodation units, transient residential dwrelling
units, employee dwelling units or dwelling units.
. 6. Phasing: All required parking for Cornerstone and INaterford shall be
located on their respective sites. AII required parking for Yhe Cascade Club
15
i
-
_ Weilness Center Addition Scenario t shall be provided in the Cascade parking '
structure.
7. Seventy-five percent of the required parking shall be located within the
main building or buildings and hidden trom public view from adjoining properties
within a landscaped benn for Westhaven Condominiums, and Millrace III.
8. All loading and detivery shall be located within buildings or as approved in
the development,plan.
B. Area B. Cotdstream Condominium~ "
Fifry percent of the required parking shall be located within the main building or
buildings and hidden from public view from adjoining properties within a
landscaped berm.
C. Area C. Glen Lyon Du I x ots •
Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52.
D. Area D. Glen Lyon Commerrial Site
TLn
length e` Required Parking and Loading shall be determined using
the normal code requirements for off-street pmrking as expressed in Section
18.52 of Yhe Zoning Code.
18.46:190 R r ation Am _nitie Tax As -c. ed
The recreatiohal amenities tax due for the development within SDD No. 4 under Chapter
3.20 shall be assessed at a rate not to exceed twenry-five cents per square foot of the floor area
in Development Area A; and at a rate not to exceed fifry cents per square foot of GRFA in
Development Area B; and at a rate not to exceed fifteen cents per square foot of GRFA in
Development Area C; and at a rate not to exceed ~~~~=~!;~f~•~ ~~-ft one dollar per square foot
of floor area in Development Area D; and shall be paid in conjunction with each construction
phase prior to the issuance of building permits. -
18.46.200 Conservation and Pollution Controlc
A. The develaper's drainage plan shall include a provision for prevention of pollution
from surtace runoff.
B. The developer shall include in the building consVuction, energy and water
conservation controls as general technology exists at the time of construction.
C. The number of fireplaces permitted shall be as set forth in Section 8.28 of the
Town of Vail Municipal as amended.
16
D. If fireplaces are provided evithin the development, they must be heat efficient
through the use of glass enclosures and heat circulating devices as technology exists at
the time of development.
E. All water features within Development Area A shall have overflow storm drains per
the recommendation of the Environmental Impact Report by Jamar Associates on Page
34.
F. All parking structures shall have pollution control devices to prevent oil and dirt
from draining into Gore Creek.
+wves~+ert~
G. All trash compactors and trash storage areas shall be completely enGosed within
Special Development District 4.
H.. Protective measures shall be used during cnnstrucbon to prevent soil erosion into
Gore Creek, particularly vuhen construction occurs in Areas A and D.
1. The twro employee dwelling units in Area D shall only be allowed to have gas
fireplaces that vneet the Touvn of Vait ordinances goveming fireplaces.
18.46.210 Additional Amenities and ft roval Agreements for S~ecial Develooment
District IVo. 4.
A. The developer shall provide or work writh the Town to provide adequate private
transportation services to the owners and guests so as to transport them from the
development to the Village Core area and Lionshead area as outlined in the approved
development plan. '
B. Developer shall provide in its approved development plan a bus shelter of a -
design and location mutually agreeable to developer and Town Council. Said shelter to
serve the area generaliy. C. Area A, Cascade Village
t. The.developer shall be responsible for providing a break-away bollard for
the emergency access road between Eagie PointeJPark Meadows, 1472
AAatterhorn'Circle, and UVesthaven Drive. The design of the bollard shall he
mutually acceptable to the developer and Town of Vail. This improvement shall
be constructed when a building permit is requested for the Comerstone, Millrace
III, Millrace IV, Westhaven Condominiums, bVatertord buildings, or Cascade.Club
addition. The bollard shall be included in the permit plans. The bollard shall be
constructed subsequent to the issuance'of a building permit and priar to the
issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the Cornerstone, AAillrace III,
AAillrace IV, Westhaven Condominiums, UVaterford buildings, or Cascade Club •
addition.
2. The developer shall consuuct a sidewalk that begins at the entrance to the
Cascade Club along Westhaven Drive and extends to the uvest in front of the
Westhavembuiiding to connect with the recreational path to Donovan Park. The .
walk shall be constructed when a building permit is requested for Westhaven
17
_ Condominiums. The sidewalk shall be part of the building permit plans. The
sidewalk shall be constructed subsequent to the issuance of a building permit arnd
prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for Westhaven
Condominiums.
3. The developer shall provide 100-year floodplain information for the area
adjacent to the Waterford and Comerstone buildings to the Town of Vail
Community Development Department before building permits are released for
either project.
4. • The conditions for Area A in Sections 18.46.020 B, 18.46.180 A. 1-7,
18.46.200 A- F, I, J, 18.46.210 C, 1-3, and 18.46220 shall be set forth in
restrictive covenants subject to the approval of the Town Attorney and once so
approved shall be recorded on the land records of Eagle County. The developer
shall be responsible for_submitting the written conditions to the Town Attorney for
approval before a building permit is requested for the Cornerstone, or Millrace III,
or Millrace tV, Westhaven Condominiums, or Watertord buildings, or Cascade
Club Addition.
5. Westhaven Drive
The Town acknowledges that it has been paid the sum of $97,500.00 from
other sources to be used by the Town for the repair and reconstruction of
Westhaven Drive. The Town further acknowledges that the title of Westhaven
Drive has been transferred to the Town. The date for the commencement of the
repair and reconstruction of the right-of-way improvements shafl be entirely at the
discretion of the Tovm. Should the Town not require the entire amount of the
, $97,500.00 for the repair and the reconstruction of Westhaven Drive, the Tovm
will forward any amount remaining after all construction related costs have been
paid in full to the parties originally contribuNng the $97,500.00 who shall refund -
. such amount pro-rata to the parties originally contributing the $97,500.00.
6. Miltrace IV. S. nario I
a. The developer shall obtain an easement from the owners of the property
adjacent to the eastern boundary of the property commonly called the Cosgriff
Parcel, which is more specifically defined in Exhibit A, attached to this ordinance
and incorporated herein by reference. The easements shall be sufficient to permit .
the construction, maintenance and replacement of retaining walls for the purposes
of grading and boulder retention all along the western property line of said
adjacent property. The easement shall be in a form acceptable to the Town
Attorney, shall run with the land, and shall be recorded on the land records of
Eagle County priorto Design Review Board review.
b. The developer shall provide the Community Development Department of
the Town with written consent from the Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation
District permitting the encroachment of certain decks specified in the development
plan for ihe Milirace IV condominiums, as set forth in Section 18.46.140(18) of this
ordinance into,their sewer easement recorded in Book 217, Page 428 of the land
records of Eagle Counry. This consent shall be submitted prior to Design Review
Board review.
18
c. The developer shall receive final approval of the site grading plan for the
construction of Millrace IV, Scenario I, from the Town Engineer prior to Design
Revieuv Board review.
d. The Millrace Condominium AAap, recorded at Book 326, page 257, of the
, land records of Eagte County shall be amended so that the access easement
shouvn thereon shall align wfth the present location of the roadwray on the western
property tine of the Cosgriff Parcel, and the amendment shall be recorded on the .
land records of Eagle County.
e. The developer shall install 15 (6-1,0') evergreens south of Yhe 5outh
Frontage Road adjacent to the Cascatle Club building, and 5(6'-.10') evergreens
to the south of the Westhaven Apartment foundations and north of Westhaven
Drive. The developer shall obtain the written approval of the Colorado
Department of Highways (CDOH) permitting the installation of these trees along
the South Frontage Road prior to said installation. If CDOH approval cannot be
obtained, then a minimum of 10 (6'-10') evergreens shall be installed adjacent to
the 1Mesthaven Apartments.
f. The developer shall apply for and camplete the minor subdivision process
for the Cosgriff Parcel and a subdivision plat signed by the Town of Vail shall be
recorded on the land records of Eagle County prior to the.release of any building
permits for the construction of any structure on the Cosgriff Parcel.
g. Landscaping along the south and west property lines of the Cosgriff Parcel
shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board to insure a suitable buffer area
between it and the other properties along said property lines.
h. The Design Review Board shall review the architecture and landscape
plan further for compatibility with the surrounding area.
i. The developer and the adjacent property owners shall submit a landscape
plan for the area north of the Cosgriff property to the Design Review Board for
review. .
j. For purposes of calculating Gross Residential Floor Area permitted on the
Cosgriff Parcel, no credits of any kind (overlapping stairs, mechanical, etc.),
excepf.for 300 sq. ft. to be allowed for each enclosed parking space,.shall be
given. 7. Cornerstone
a. Before the building permit is released for the project, the developer shall permanently restrict three employee housing units in accordance with Section
18.46220 of this ordinance.
b. The landscape plan set forth in the development plan for Cornerstone beNveen
the Terrace Wing and Cornerstone building shall be revised prior to the review of
the project by the DRB in the followring ways:
1. For emergency services, an access lane shall be provided from the
western courtyard to the ski lift.
2. If deemed necessary by the developer and the Communiry
Development Department staff, the water feature on the landscape plan may be removed or revised. The landscaping in this area shall be part of the Comerstone
19
development, and, therefore, it is the Comerstone devetoper's responsibiliry to
complete this portion of the project prior to the release of a final Certificate of
Occupancy for the project. These plans shall be included in the building permit for
the Cornerstone development.
c. After the Town of Vait has title to Westhaven Drive, it shall convey title to the
developer for the area of Westhaven Drive under which parking is located for the
Comerstone project. The amended minor subdivision plat shall be submitted by
the developer before a building permit is released for the Cornerstone site. The
developer shall dedicate an access easement to the Town over this portion of
Westhaven Drive.
d. All fireplaces shall be gas appliances pursuant to Section 8.28 af the Vail
Municipal Code.
e. Those spaces allocated to commercial areas as short term public parking shall
be permanently restricted for the use of the Comerstone project. All required
parking associated with the uses shall not be conveyed, used or leased
separately from the uses. Publie parking on the Westhaven Drive level of the
Cornerstone project shall be made available to the public for short term parking.
8. Waterford
a. The developer shall permanently restrict the tow employee housing units
provided in the Waterford Development Plan in accordance with Section
18.46.220 of this ordinance.
b. A minor subdivision plat shall be completed and recorded prior to the
release of any building permits for either the Cornerstone or Watertord
developments.
c. The recreation path shall be relocated as set forth on the development
plan and shall be amended on the minor subdivision plat for the Watertord and -
Cornerstone lots to correspond to the new locaaon.
d. The DRB will review the landscaping in the areas of the retaining walls on
the west and east ends of the site. The DRB will review the north elevations
• architectural details. The applicant shall review the possibility of eliminating the
skier access on the east end of the project. However, if the applicant can
significantly decrease the retaining walls necessary to build the access. the skier
access may in.
e. All fireplaces shall be gas logs permitted pursuant to Section 8.28 of the
Vail Municipal Code.
9. The Ruins / Westhav n Condomini mc
a. All construcbon shall conform to the development presented to the Planning and
Environmental Commission on February 27, 1995, and to the drawings identified
in Section 18.46.140 (development plans) numbered 45-51.
b. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall sign Type III EHU
Deed restrictions for the 17 employee housing units. The deed restricUons shall
be modified to fa low floor area requirements to be less than 450 sq. ft. In addition
to the restrictions included in the Type III EHU deed restriction, the applicant .
, agrees to future restrictions that the Town will adopt that pertain to deed restricted
20
employee housing, including, but not limfted to; a three percent cap on resale
price, requirements that employee housing units have a reduced homeowners
association fee relative to free market units; and requirements pertaining to resale
procedures.
c. Prior 4o issuance of the building permit, civil engineering plans for road
improvements must be reviewed and approved by the Town of Vail Engineer.
Road improvements shall include curb and gutter trom the eastern edge of the
bike path to the westem edge of the curb cut servicing this property.
• d. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the appticant shall dedicate an
easement for the bike path that crosses this property.
e. Prior to an issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy (TCO) the applicant
- shall regrade and revegetate the berm adjacent to this site, in the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) right-of-way, so Yhat its northern slope does
- not exceed 2:1. Prior to the issuance of a TCO, the applicant shall remove the
Nvo utility poles in the CDOT right-of-uvay and shall bury the uUlity line to the third
utility pole wrest of this property.
f. Prior to the issuance of a T.C.O., a sidewalk shall be constructed that begins at
the entrance to the Cascade Club along Westhaven Drive and extends to the west
- in front of the Westhaven Building to connect with the recreational path to
Donovan Partc
g. The entire building, including the garage, must be sprinkled.
D. Area D, Glen Lyon Commercial Site. 1. The developer shall agree to construct a bus lane per Towrn of Vail
standards '
adjacen4 to the office building's main entryway. The specific location for the _
bus lane shall be
, ' . s shown on the approved and development plans. The bus lane shall be constructed subsequent to the
issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of
occupancy for ' , the office expansion. exeladiflg-pr?Crse
site.
2. The developer shall 21
eendotmaLnftl
stwelare.construct all rosd and bike lane improvements shown on the
approved development plans according to CDOT and Town of Vail,
requirements and standards. The road improvements shall be constructed
subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and such improvements
shall be revuevued and accepted as complete by CDOT and Town of Vail prior
to the issuance of a TCO for the ofBice expansion.
3. , The developer shall underground the eiectrical utitities along ttie north side
of the Glen Lyon property from the norttiwest corner of the properry to the
northeast comer of the property. This utiliry work shall be constructed subsequent
to the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary
certificate of occupancy for eiNjer the $rerrefy-eddigert, office expansion.
4.
5. The developer of the Glen Lyon Office property shall not file any
remonstrance or protest against the formation of a iocal improvement district of
other financing mechanism approved by the Vail Town Council which may be
established for the purpose of building road improvements for the South Frontage
Road.
6. The developer shall provide a fire hydrant per Town of Vail Fire
Department requirements on the northwest portion of the property. The specific
location for the fire hydrant shall be approved by the Vail Fire Department. The _
fire hydrant shall be provided subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and
prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for Hhe-brewery
addifren; office .
stfuettife.
7.
The developer shall submit a full set of civil
engineered plans for the South Frontage Road improvements consistent with
the approved site plan to the Town of Vail Engineer for review and approval
. befere-e prior to submittal of building permit is released for eitk?erPpese-I
, 11, . the office expansion.
22
~
9. The entire Glen Lyon Office Building amd Bpshall be
sprinklered and have a fire alarm detection system. Town of Vail Fire Department .
approval of the sprinkler and fire alarm systems shall be required before a building
permit is released.
10. The developer shall submit a set of efwended civil engineered ptans to
the Colorado Di7isieR-ef-Higlnnr~qs Depardnen4 09 TransportaYion for review and
approval. The improvements on-GH9:F CDpT property proposed by the
developer must receive 6B911CDATapproval betor , 11,
aod-1+1-m plans presented to the Town of Vail Design Review Board for final
approval.
18.46.220 Emolovee Ho Ucinn
23
The development of SDD No. 4 will have impacts on available employee housing within
the Upper Eagte Valley area. In order to help meet this additional employee housing need, the
developer(s) of Areas Aand-E) shall provide employee housing on site. The developer(s) of Area
A shall build a minimum of 17 employee- dwelling units within Area A Westhaven Condominium
building, 3 within the Comerstone Building and 2 within the Waterford Building. Each employee
dwelling unit in the Westhaven Condominium Building shall be deed restricted as a Type III EHU.
Each employee unit in the Comerstone Building shall have a minimum square footage of 600
square feet. There shall be a total of 2 employee dwelling units in the Waterford Building. One
shall be a minimum of-300 square feet and the other a minimum of 800 square feet.:
The developer of Area D shall bnilel provide 2 employee dwelling units in-N9e,4ree-D
. . to offset employee housing
needs. The !wo units rtoay be provided off-site H roecessary, but must be,newly deed
restricted employee units. All Employee Housing Units shall be deed restricted per Section
18.57, as amended, of the.Vail Muniapal Code prior to issuance of building permits for the
respective project.
18.46.230 Time Renuirements
SDD No. 4 shall be governed by the procedures outlined in Section 18.40.120 of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Section 4•
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validiry of the remaining portions of
this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and -
each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Section
The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code
as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any dury.imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective dafe hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any ,
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 6•
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. The repealer
shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof,
heretofore repealed.
24
i
INTRODUCED, RE4D, APPROVED, AfVD OFIDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IfV FULL OfV
FIRST READING this and a pubiic hearing shall be
held on this Ordinance on the , , at 7:30 P.M. in
the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
AAargaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly L. fiAcCutcheon, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING this day of
, 1995.
AAerv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
ATTEST: .
Holly L. W1cCutcheon, Town Cterk
f:l9veryonebrdbrd8.95
25
- HLE COPY
RAEIIAOR/ANDLIM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FRONH: Community Deveiopment Department
DATE: August 14, 1995.
. SUBJECT: A request for a major amendment to the Cascade Village Special Development
District (SDD #4) to allowr for the expansion of Yhe Glen Lyon Office Building
located at 1000 South Frontage Road VVesfi/Area D, Cascade Village.
,4pplicants: Gordon Pierce, representing Glen Lyon Partnership Planner: Randy Stouder
De 6NTROD9JCT10N APBD BACKGROUND
The Glen Lyon Office Building is located in Development Area D ofi the Cascade Village SDD
(SDD #4). The original Cascade Village SDD was approved in 1976 and has since been
amended several times. The most recent amendment to SDD #4 is Ordinance No. 8, Series ofi
1995, which stipulates how all of the areas are to be developed, including Area D. The latest SDD amendment approval that affected Area D specifically, was granted by the Town Council in 1993. This approval gives the applicant the ability to:
1. Add square footage to the existing office building;
2. Develop a micro-brewrery; and
3. Construct one free-market dwrelling unit and finro Type III employee housing units.
Section I I I of this memorandum compares the latest Area D amendment approval with the
current proposal.
In the fall of 1994 the applicant proposed a major amendment to the approved micro-brewrery
plans. The 1994 proposal included the elimination of the brewrery in favor of additional office
space. It called for a tvvo-phased development plan that included an addition over the existing
office building, a new office building and structured parking. The PEC held a worksession to
evaluate this proposal, but no formal action was taken on the application. Thus, the original .
approved micro-brewery plans still represent the latest vested approval.
00. PRO.?ECT DESCR1PT9ON
The current proposal calls for the elimination of the micro-brewery concept. An 8,527 square foot
office addition is proposed. This proposal would add a third level to the two-story section of the
existing building, and a fourth level over the entire building. The current proposal would expand
and realign the existing parking lot so that alf required parking would be contained on-site. A
portion of the existing parking lot is located on Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)
right-of-way.
The office building expansion generates sufficient additional automobile trips to trigger several
improvements to the South Frontage Road, including turn lane additions and a reconfiguration of
the existing bike path and the bus pull-out areas. The entryway to the parking lot will be moved
so that it lines up with the east entrance to the Cascade Crossing Shopping Center. Also, the
applicant proposes to apply a Type II Employee Housing Unit deed restriction to an existing off-
site, free-market unit as compensation for the loss of the iwo employee housing units approved
with the micro-brewery amendment.
The existing Glen Lyon Office Building has cedar siding, which has been stained dark green.
Accent elements have been painted dark orange: Under the current proposal, the applicant
would remove the cedar siding on the existing building and replace it with stucco to match the
proposed addition. The added upper level stories will have a slightly larger footprint than the
existing building, creating a two-foot overhang on the north and south sides. A vaulted fourth
floor (17 fooi plate section) and standing-seam metal roof, at a 6/12 pitch, are proposed and will add significantly to the overall height of the building. The entire building will be upgraded to meet
Building Code exiting, ADA, and fire regulations. A new elevator tower will be added adjacent to
the building's main entrance. An existing external stairway will be extended along the east side
of the building to access the proposed upper level addition, and a new stair tower will be added
at the northwest corner of the building. _
The proposed changes to the South Frontage Road are shown on the applicant's site plan (see
attached drawings). The road section will be re-striped to meet CDOT and TOV standards, and
the bike path will be accommodated as a paved shoulder in the proposed road section. The bus
stop will be moved to the west and a new bus pull-out will be provided directly in front of the
building. The roadway concept for the South Frontage Road includes a through-lane in each
direction and a center turn-lane that would accommodate left-hand turning movements into the Cascade Crossing Retail Center and the GIen.Lyon Office Building. An acceleration/deceleration
lane will be provided in each direction to accommodate right turns into and out of the parking
lots.
A public meeting to consider the applicanYs proposal was previously scheduled with the PEC for July 24, 1995. The PEC received a staff memorandum prior to the scheduled meeting and that
memorandum recommended denial of the applicanYs proposal. The applicant requested that the
PEC table their application for the July 24th meeting so that the remaining staff issues could be
resolved. The applicant met with CDOT, the Town Engineer and the planning staff, and has
resolved the major outstanding issues raised by staff in the July 24, 1995 memorandum to the
PEC. Although civil engineered plans must be submitted to CDOT and the Town Engineer for
final approval prior to Design Review Board action on this proposal, staff is reasonably
comfortable with-the current road improvement proposal by the applicant.
,
2
UiDe ZONIR1G STAMST9CS
The table below compares the approved SDD (micro-brewery) to the current proposal:
Aooroved SDD Prooosed addition Ebstina Buildina
Height: 51 % max. 40 feet 47 feet 30 feeU20 feet
4996 max. 32 feet
Setbadcs: Per developmern plan:
Pl: 2 feet N: 18 feet iV: 28 feet
S: 8 feet S: 31 feet S: 33 feet
E: 30 feet E: 425 feet E: 425 feet
W: 15 feet W: 82 feet W: 94 feet
Stream Setback: 50 feet from oenterline 59 feet building 61 feet building
53 feet on- grade parking 60 feet on-grade parking
Site Coverage: 37% or 29,010.9 sq. ft. 8.3% or 6,551 sq. ft. 7.45'0 or 5,791 sq. ft.
Landscaping: 609Y or 47,044.8 sq. ft. (min.) 62.9% or 49,345 sq. ft, y/,4
Parking: Per Town of Vail regulations 78 spaces required 52 spaces required
(100 spaces enclosed) 78 spaces proposed 53 spaces provided
Commercial Floor -
Area: - 32.314 sq. ft. Gross: 23,918 Gross: 15,391
Net: 19,736 Plet: 13,087
Rsnsity: 1 hee market DU allowed -0- free market -0- 6ee market
2 Type III Residential EHU's required 1 type II EHU eestrietad ° -0- EHU's
GRFA: minimum size for the two 844 sq. ft. for the (y/q
employee units shali be off-site EHU
795 square feet and
900 square feet.
Common Area: 35% of 32,314 square feet 4,182 sq. h. 2,304 sq. ft.
or 11,309.9 square feet
Loading and Delivery: 1 benh required ' 1 yehh -0-
' A reduction in the number of EHU's is proposed. The applicant proposes to deed restrict an existing hee-market unit, located off-site.
The approved SDD (micro-breuvery) has several significant development standards that will apply to the
proposed addition. Below are salient points from the approved SDD. Staff will ensure that these standards
are met prior to issuing a building permit for,Yhe project.
1. The developer's drainage plan shall include a provision for prevention of pollution from surFace
runoff.
2. The developer shall include in the building construction, energy and water conservation controls as
general technology exis4s at the time of construction.
3. All parking sfructures shall have pollution control devices to prevent oil and dirt from draining into
Gore Creek.
4. Protective measures shall be used during construction to prevent soif erosion into Gore Creek,
particularly uvhen construction occurs in Rreas A and D.
5. A recreation amenities tax is to be assessed at a rate of $1.00 per square foot of floor area to be
paid for each phase before the building permit is issued.
3
IV. SDD CRITERIA
~
There are nine SDD review criteria which are used to evaluate the merits of an SDD amendment.
The criteria are as follows:
~
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative go architectural design, scale,
bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and
orientation.
The applicant is proposing a 47-foot tall, 4-story structure. All other structures in
the general vicinity are between one and three stories tall, with the highest
structure being the Vail Professional Building directly across the street, with a
height of approximately 30 feet. The applicant has designed the fourth floor to be
vaulted space, with a total cross sectional height of 17 feet, including the
structural members of the roof. The vaulted space adds to the height, mass and
bulk of the building.
To reduce height, mass and bulk of the building, staff feels that the long,
unbroken ridge line (96 feet) should be stepped down or (lowered) at the west
side of the elevator tower. This would break up the mass of the building and step
the ridge line down with the topography. A significant portion of the building would
still have vaulted space. The applicant points out that the requested stepping
would compromise internal space (i.e. a portion of the internal space would have
a ceiling height of less than 8 feet). Although staff believes it is not grounds for a
recommendation for denial, staff feels that the stepping of the roof line would
reduce the mass and bulk of the building,.resulting in a structure that is more
compatible with the surrounding development. We would encourage the applicant
to work with the DRB on the final details relating to the roof design.
The applicanYs ptans indicate a 12-22 foot wide landscaped buffer area between
the parking lot and the South Frontage Road. Other adjacent properties have a
minimum 20 foot wide bermed and heavily landscaped buffer area separating
buildings and parking areas from the Frontage Road. In some instances, the
buffer area is up to 40 feet wide (V.A. Maintenance Shops). The applicant has
provided the widest possible landscape buffer given the road improvements
required by CDOT. The specific details of the proposed landscape plan will be
thoroughly reviewed by staff, CDOT and the Design Review Board prior to final
plan approval. However, staff is satisfied the landscape buffer is sufficient to
screen the parking lot area and mitigate visual/aesthetic impacts related to the re-
development of the site.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable
relationship with surroundirug uses and activity.
Staff agrees that the expansion of office space on this site is very desirable. The
communiry has been requesting new office space in Town to prevent the move of
office uses to down valley areas. -
The applicant has agreed to place a Type II employee unit deed restriction on an
off-site secondary dwelling unit as compensation for the loss of the two Type III "
EHU's. Staff finds this acceptable since this proposal is a much smaller
expansion than the Brewery.
' 4
C. Compliance with parkingi anci 9oading requiretnents as out66ned 'an Chapter
18o52a -
The applicant has revised Yhe site plan to provide all seventy-eight (78) required
parking spaces and the required loading berth. Twenfy (20) spaces or 25% of the
required parking spaces have been designated as compact car parking. ,411
parking requirements (Chapter 18.52) have nouv been met. ,4lthough the loading
berth does not fiully comply with the 12' X 25' dimensions, it should be adequate
for the UPS type vehicles that make deliveries to be properry. The constraints of
the site simply do not allow for a full sized loading berth.
D. Conform¢ty with applocable e9ernents of the @Jail Comprehensive Plan, Towea
po9icies and Urban Desogn Planso
"1. General Grov??th and Development 1_1 Vail should continue 4o grow in a controlled environmen4, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve
both the visitor and the permanent resident. -
1_2 The quality of the environment including air, water and oYher-natural
resources should be protected as the Towrn grows:
1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible. -
1.5 Commercial strip development of the valley should be avoided.
1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing
developed areas."
The goals of the Town's Land Use Plan, quoted above, indicate that additional
commercial development should be accommodated in existing commercial areas.
They also indicate that new commercial development should be balanced with a
need to preserve desirable natural features such as trees, and stream valley
areas. These goals also encourage quality redevelopment, and state that
commercial strip development of the valley should be avoided.
The proposed parking lot design could have significant impacts to existing
vegetation. The portion of the parking lot east of the vehicular entrance has been
shifted to eliminate previous encroachment into the stream seYback area. This will
reduce potential impacts to steep streambank areas and has eliminated a section
of the retaining wall along the south edge of the parkin.g lot. However, the
proposed parking lot Will still encroach into the drip zones of several large trees.
Staff will continue to work with the applicant to reduce impacts to exisYing trees,
and if necessary, will bring this issue back to the PEC for further consideration.
E. Otlent's$6ca40on and ma4igaqaon of natura9 aead/or geo9ogic hazards that affect the
p@'opePty On eRlh9Ch tB'B@ SpeC9aI deV@IOPmeEEt d9Str9Ct @S prOpOSede
The natural and geologic conditions related to Gore Creek and the adjacent steep
slopes produce significant constraints on the re-development of the subject
project. The applicant has done a good job to minimize impacYs to the
5
streambank areas, but significant impacts could sYill occur. Staff will work with the
applicant to reduce impacts related to the installation of the parking lot retaining
wall and storm sewer pipes that convey parking lot runoff down to Gore Creek.
. The applicant has revised plans to minimize disturbance to the extent feasible.
The applicant has also provided the minimum amount of parking lot area
necessary to meet the parking standards for the Town.
F. Site plan, building design amd location and opem space provisions designed
to produce a functional developcnent responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
The staff believes that the proposed site plan is as sensitive as possible to the
natural features and vegetation that exist on this property. Some impacts to
mature trees are likely, and limited areas of streambank disturbance will occur.
However, staff feels that the project has been designed to minimize these
impacts. Additional measures can be used to mitigate potential impacts. Staff
will work with the applicant to implement "Urban Best Management Practices" or
BMP's to prevent tree loss in key areas. BMP's are essentially state-of-the=art
techniques to minimize environmental degradation associated with urban
- development. The applicant has committed to install curb and gutter to control
drainage and improve the aesthetics of the proposal. Given the currently
proposed grading of the parking lot, the applicant will need to install a curb at the
south edge of the lot to prevent drainage from causing erosion of the step
streambank areas.
G. A circulation system designed for bo4h vehicles and pedes4rians aaidressing
on and off-site traffic circulation.
On-site circulation patterns within the parking lot are not optimal but are
acceptable. The parking lot entrance has been relocated to align with the
entrance to the Cascade Crossing and Vail Professional Center parking lots. The
applicant has maintained a 10-foot bike/pedestrian shoulder lane along the
Frontage Road. Grade separated sidewalks are provided adjacent to the bus pull-
out, and a walkway and steps provide pedestrian access from the bus stop to the
building entrance. A light pole will be relocated to the top of the stairs for safety
purposes. .
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to op4irnize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
The applicant has worked within the natural constraints of the property to
maximize useable open space and preserve natural features. Recreational
. opportunities are provided in the form of bike path improvements. Meaningful
landscaping is provided along the Frontage Road and will be increased to the
extent feasible given the limitations imposed by automobile safety precautions
related to road shading and site•lines.
1. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional anai
efficient relatioraship throughout the development of the special development
CI IStPtCi.
No phasing plan is proposed as a part of this development.
6
V. STAFF RECOnAMENDAT9ON Staffi recommends that the PEC foavvard a recommendation of approva9 of the proposed
major SDD amendrneng go the Town Counc'sEe Final project approval should be contingenY upon
compliance with the following conditions:
9. The applicant shall minimize impacts to existing trees and steep slopes adjacent to Gore
Creek. The applicant shall work uvith staff and the Design Review Board to implemenY
BMP's and revise plans to achieve this goal. The applicant shall pravide a letter of credit
or escrow account deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the replacement cost of the
large evergreens around the edge of the proposed parking fot. This financial guarantee
shall be held for two (2) full growing seasons to ensure that these trees survive the re-
development of the property.
-2. The applicant shall underground all above.ground utilities in conjunction with the
proposed construction. In the event that the utilities cannot be buried on this properry
only, then the applicant shall provide a cash deposit or letter of credit to benefit the Tovun
in efforts to bury a larger segment of the utility lines in the vicinity.
3. The applicant shall obtain_ CDOT and TOV approval for the proposed roadway and
drainage. improvements prior to DRB submittal. A full seY of civil engineered plans must
be submitted to CDOT and the To'wn of Vail staff to address this issue. Curb and gutter
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Town staff. Minor improvements to the
roadway in the vicinity of the Sandstone Creek crossing and points further east may be
. required at the discretion of the Town sYaff.
4. The applicant shall provide curb and gutter across the entire frontage of the property.
The applicant shall also install a curb along the south edge of the parking lot to channel
runoff into storm drain inlets.
f
Aeveryon elpec\m emos\g lob.814
7
~
;
SCALE: t' = 20'
\TE OF SURVEY: 5/13%94 w„ w
I.N arr •.o cro , w
c c,w
~ .
McIur[z :O..rfpa,s -ar.t wc ~v_.• ~:wt-[. ~
~
M"'TS XpOQ.M ytf. AM: -•.M }/w!'En
~
~ r er~ a !
~ i? ~~~i,: i ~ ~
sop~,~yos C7tBO
aIWk 4lVC
~ 11~Af /
Pt.. 0 C4P
dt~+d oft ~
. EP:! Jf ~ -ra•. ~ ' y ~ "mww./ OllTO
P"f 3 ~
RE7r ,
aFV»~ vc.+ o-.i y ~ v ' !aF=.....rs~io;,
_nr5 ' ~•o ~ M~FI
8-
A . ~
R l7qCH / ~ .
'.n' '~o :o
. ' ~~~1~`-1 ~ ~1 r?~W p..
~ J/1 h
SC-ER w. t.i
, ; \ • ~ Z ~ ~ CRE
WRE
~-o• - vv.cu o«c
i
~~i^ 79r15'02r E, c.rn -
,
EDGE COItE
/9060
/ ; / ~ ~ . ! o...
PROPOSED SITE P N
_ J// / ~ eatlA17~00 O~w~ e.
~ CMa1N SI
i~
i .
-
. , _ . -
PARXING REQUIpENENTS ' Sepa~,
4
poa0
AraAltaete
P.C.•4.1.~.
onrn e~
0.^!. ~.mCYA el O~M .+~~.d .y.d ' _~nca oamcacacs .
' Aw.e ~ea.r.r c.a. M..~ 7T.7 .l Aa . . nnces. I
i+J ~.o iW w.e 1
~
e~
hrl R.de d 4~ 1Lpb~! 17 ~~~J . , 1
ttt r heaa faem Ca h fsa.e • ' . / v~~ ~ f~ , i
~c 1k vs.~'_d [ tl) mC[ ~~t a a i .n~~n ~
- m {
\ uGi . ~
TGI 4e f4+.4d p
6fm 10 iR FSiRRi ~ ~ em 1 ~
n0."w
mMR ~
a
I I
' /f1m IP •~aY
1 IOGS/
~O, ~~tai •FS
~ / 6 ~`ppf.• 1
/
I / i
[xx nM e u,mn ~ ~ rG ~ ~ ~ ' ~
r`¢°
viaK ~ V
W ~
I
, rp'~ ~duo
V
No
8 w
SE a0~
~M1f P G ~o~,~,
, / _ I Q tJ~B'afi~.'a0
ro /
I .
g W ~ ~
~
' • t, , o ix ' °...mmv•
e.a~ux So^x f > • cao~,n I
_ m
• - % o ' o
30 aoc.
N L ~ ~ ~ ~,n
J ~ / , ~ ~ •
. J ~ ioe au rwoe PLa14,~erta.oau~ernov
looea re~~.r~ooomfun.nc[ uuo. nat-
i
i
i
_ ~~~~~SED
. I f ~e.w a I
~
~ O
a
. ~
: i
?
C." a 00n. ~ . ~
e . i
- ' I
r~onr I
ourt V
~
tx Ls 14e21
i a . Wwr..
fmc
/ y_ ~ l ~C~ ~~Hc ~ oa o. .rr.,. ~ A 'Q;
62C w
/ o ~0
N ~ - W - , ~ ^ Z ,
t11Gt{WR
fROM11++" ~ ASp.yit ~MR _ 1. ~ . "
fQ ~ / ~ I
dx
~ ~ • ; ' p p
/ i ~ ~ ' i?f.
= ~SMK' ~M IRM lOUID[" ( 1.! .
a.
. ~a roc• ~ S1~g~ ~a ) cam:eia f
-.o.7 rw ~ •c ~ 6g~ fM) < ~ ` ~ ~
_ i
- ~
Wwr
"l1 ~
I /
K ~ i00 K~~ R000 R~~w.~w~IMOt~ttOropr I
~ ro~. a r~i~. qooe ~~fu+~+c[ 1~VOr ~fv.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
.d...... ~
. ~ C
~
~ PREAJMINARV PLAP'T SCHEDULE~o~a~,~
. I SeQa~a.Q a
Spaoq
Cm. Cvr&%CAL am= OQ Wl'79 OIiD qOppc(p ' ArehllaHp
nlta v.c.. ~.~.w.
o waaa.~-~eG~+ ut~ ooGms 747.8.14r.aJr.7.10 Wj~
Qw~q A~ ..r..,..vt:=.Cm
cu~~ I
Pwr~aio R-qh4ftw~
Ne! Ww3alr-MIO F~ q~ ar OL •
' Am.m- A%eea , c~C~
wr
I ~Mm~ we°°".e ~ wro m
wo~w a
a ocrw'~r,~
rms..camc mreoaa~ra a o.e
a~amo ~a amw am.w ~ maca ra wo~r~.~ m oo.e,c rrq as~a
_ I I~~m sim~.v sm~aa ft~- a o~ m O.c tftgd, ft-v . I
caamm
scnLE: a20- DATE OF SURVEY: 3/13/94 1 I ~ (
~ I
. on, ovr o dm ~ I I )
em[: . . ~ o 00 ~ i
umx~*e oowv+an rn¢ ,wo rrana awcrzn ~
0
QWuro ocw«R ma »4 w~.cna 1NtER5SA `so~'"
.
I.
~ ~
\~a~..
. F.0 - Ii.o M a 6+C
Q ~
^ [0010 OVM-im
a'W4M \
0.0 ( M 1 a. . I ~ww..
/ wc owm e~acs
PO-0 i 0~owvoo
~ saw
a ~ e090
ft-.4 G°RE / I I (
E _ 31~.74
1 ma oouc umc ~
~ _ a.....
. / ~
/
" _ PLAING AND EI1tONMENTAH., COM101IS3ION
Augusg 14, 1995
Minutes
MEMBERS PRESERIT: MEMBERS ABSEATT: STAFF PRESEAT'T:
Bob Armour Dalton Vdilliams Susan Connelly
~enry Pratt Mike Mollica
Jeff Bowen Andy ICnudtsen
Greg 1Vioffet Randy Stouder
Kevin Deighan George Ituther
Greg Amsden Russell Forrest
Judy Rodriguez
IPublic Hearin- 2:00 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Bob Armour at 2:05 p.m.
1. A request for a site coverage variatice to allow for additions to the existing residence
located at 1868 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 47, Vail Village West Filing #1.
Applicant: John and Bobbi Ann Houtsma ,
Planner: Cieorge ltuther George Ruther gave a description of the request and explained that it was on the DRB agenda for
8/16/95. He stated that Staff was recommending approval of the request with four conditions.
The applicant, Bobbi Ann Houtsma stated that this was the only design they could come up with
for a new garage.
Bob Armour reiterated that the landscaping along the road needed to be maintained by Yhe
. applicant.
Kevin Deighan had no concerns with the request.
Greg Moffet agreed with George Ruther as far as the applicant meeting the criteria and findings.
Greg Amsden had no problem with the request. Henry Pratt had no problem with the request.
Jeff Bowen commended the applicant for creating employee housing, while improving the
residence.
Planning and Environmental Commission
- Minutes
August 14, 1995
~
Jeff Bowen_made a motion to approve the request for a site coverage variance with the condirions as stated in the Staff inemo. The motion was seconded by Greg Moffet. .
Ail voted unanimousiy in favor, with a vote of 6-0. .
2. A request for a Conditional Use Pernut to allow the Vail Valley Medical Center to park a
mobile catheter lab/trailer, located at 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E& F, Vail Village
2nd Filing. ' Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Dan Feeney
Planner: Randy Stouder Jeff. Bowen stated he would not step down regarding this request.
Randy Stouder gave an overview of the request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Staff has
recommended approval with conditions, since the applicant has met the CUP criteria. The Staff
felt the landscaping condition was important, as well as.revisiting the approval after one year.
Landscaping Option A calls for six large evergreens to be placed on the north side of the lab.
Option B revised the proposal by suggesting a mixture of trees, perhaps smaller in size with an
incrcased quantity providing a wider belt of landscape screening.
Dan Feeney had comments on the Staff s conditions. To have the lab gone by 4pm might be hard
to comply with, since a heavy patient load might cause a delay. A heavy patient load could lead
to bringing the lab back a second time.
Bob Armour asked if the lab would be brought in more than once per month.
Dan Feeney stated yes; but no more than three times per month total.
Dan Feeney said an exception must be made for running the generator during a power outage for
patient safety.
Bob Armour stated that the one year re-evaluation would be a review of how smoothly the
operation was going. '
Randy Stouder, likewise, stated that this re-evaluation was to review operational procedures and
would not be used to revoke the CUP unless major problems arose.
Henry Pratt said that the purpose of the one year terni was not to revoke the CUP, but would be a
chance to fine tune the agreement; i.e. to change operating hours or respond to complaints.
Ray McMahan was uneasy with the one year re-evaluation and wanted assurance that the tenn
would be at least three to five years.
Greg Moffet said perhaps the condition could be reworded.
Planning and Environmentai Commission
Minutes
August 14, 1995 2
• - - 1, _
Li
' Randy Stouder strongly advised to keep the one year re-evaluation ia the agreement.
Creg 1Vloffet remimded Ramdy Stouder that this procedure represeated a three year investcnent.
Henry Pratt suggested the language be changed.
liRike ARollica mentioned Ciarton's Saloon was in a similar situation and had to reapply each year.
He also agreed with Randy Stouder to re-evaluate the project after 1 year, not to revoke the
permit, but only to tweak and refine it. .
Kevin Deighan agreed with Staff because the CUP could affect the neighborhoad. He wanted to
re-evaluate it after. 1 year.
Pam Stenmark, manager of the Evergreen Lvdge and representing the management and condo
association, agreed with examining the impacts after 1 year. She agrees with the new lab location
if heavily landscaped. ltight now the south facing rdoms do see an unlandscaped berm and are
already faced with truck noise and views of the hospital's back side.
Bob Armour asked if Pam was comfortable with the landscaping Option B.
Pam said yes, if 2/3 of the plants are placed west of the Ambulance District Building.
Bob Armour asked for aay more public input.
Henry Pratt wanted taller trees for instant gratification. He felt screening the ambulance building
was a waste of money. He also doesn't believe in telling people what hours to run their
businesses. He would like to see not restricting their hours of operation, but only that they could
not operate before 8:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. Guests at the hotel shouldn't have to hear the
noise generated from this operation. .
: Stephanie Urbanowitz said restricting hours was going to present some problems. Weather could
be a factor. ?o arrive on the site between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m..the night before and leave
between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. was a commitment they could keep most of the time.
Bob Armour said he didn't want trucks backing in and out during yuiet hours and wanted the
PEC to review this again next year. He felt it important to keep specific hours since this was a
sensitive issue.
Jeff Bowen suggested adjusting the times of departure to after 6:00 p.m. and not later than 9:00
p.m. .
Greg Amsden thinks there needs to be work on the landscaping around the tnack area, but
otherwise he is in favor of the application. Greg Moffet thinks to avoid peak times, they-should arrive prior to 9:00 p.m. and depart prior to
8:00 p.m. the following day.
Planning and Environmental Commission
AAinutes
August 14, 1995 3
Stephanie i.Jrbanowitz wanted a window open between 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m to depart. Greg Moffet suggested a 12 hour window, between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
Kevin Deighan agreed with the 12 hour window.
Bob Armour said it is best to ask them whea not to operate, rather than when to operate.
Randy Stouder stated that it was the transportation of the vehicle in and out of Town that was the
issue, not the actual hours of operation of servicing the patients.
Pam Stenmark suggested recording the times of operation, arrivals and departures in a log.
Randy Stouder stated that some of the landscaping proposed on Option B did not meet the
Town's minimum size requirement for trees ( 2" caliber).
Bob Armour said that alI aspens should be changed to a 2" caliber.
Henry Pratt said he would like see taller trees.
Henry Pratt asked Randy Stouder if this plan had to go to the DRB.
Randy said no, it could be Staff reviewed and approved.
Pam Stenmark suggested wildflower seed on the bank to supplement the trees.
Bob Armour said he was comfortable with the landscaping plan and felt quantity was importa.nt.
Pam Stenmark said she would like to see some taller trees in the plan. She thought perhaps fewer
aspens, which are barren in the winter, adding to the height of the spruce instead, so during the ,
. winter a screen is still there.
Randy Stouder suggested the applicant produce a final landscaping plan for Staff review based on
the PEC's comments.
Henry Pratt made a motion to approve the CUP subject to the following changes:
1. That arrival or departure will not occur between 9:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m.
2. That the plan is re-evaluated at the end of one year.
3. That the landscaping Option B is changed per the PEC's comments and subject to final
review and approval by Staff. That ten (minimum 2" caliber) aspen be planted and eleven
spruce with a height of 8'-12' are iucluded in the landscaping plan,
Greg Moffet said that during unforseen power outages the lab should be able to run the
generators.
Planning and Environmental Commissian
Minutes
August 14, 1995 4
Henry amended the motion.
Per Greg's comments Jeff seconded the motion.
Ray McMahan asked if the language could be chaaged to "review," rather than re-evaluate.
Henry Pratt was reluctant to change the language to review.
Bob Armour stated that the language would remain re-evaluate.
All voted unanimously in favor, with a vote of 6-0. 3. A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the remodel of the Cpolf Course
' Maintenance Facility, located at 1278 Vail Valley I)rive/Parcel E, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Vail flZecreation District, represerrted by Emie Bender
Planner: Russell Forrest
Russ Forrest said the request had been changed since the worksession. He gave an overvievv of
the changes. Staff recommended approval with the following conditions: ,
A) A letter be prepared by a qualified geologist or engineer stating howr mitigation
can protect the facility and not adversely affect other adjacent properties. This
mitigation rnust be incorporated into the building plans for the facilitN.
B) A written report from the environmental audit be provided to staff and that all
major compliance issues be resotved uvithin 60 days of the PEC approval of Yhis
application.
C) Wood siding or stucco, subject, to DRB approval, be placed on the exposed
concrete wall surrounding the trash enclosure.
Russ Forrest said the applicants have bullced up the landscaping plan as suggested at the
worksession. Staff feels that the landscaping plan will be an improvement to the site.
Russ Forrest alsa noted that an environmental audit, that the PEC requested, was done and six
different acrions to clean up the site were identified. A letter is still needed from a geologist.
Staff wants this done, along with completing the actions in the audit, within 60 days of approval.
Russ Forrest also mentioned that wood siding is also needed on the exposed concrete for the Yrash
container.
Russ Forrest stated that Tom Moorhead was asked to look at the General Use District and
whether the applicant was required to provide housing. Tom could find no provision in our code
to require housing. For example, a hospital expansion may require housing for new nursing
students. There seems to be no reasonable connection between housing and this application. Tom
Moorhead described when housing is appropriate. He doesn't feel housing, in this case, is
appropriate. Tom 1Vloorhead prepared a memo to address employee housing.
. Planning and Environmental Commission .
Minutes
August 14, 1995 5
Greg Amsden asked if the applicants had anything to add.
Tim Kehoe stated that he was open for questions.
Kevin Deighan had no major problems with the plan, but is "disillusioned" that employee housing
is not part of this plan.
Jeff Bowen was "saddened" that no housing was being proposed. He is not sure that housing at
this site made sense. He feels strongly that employee housing should be included with all new
development in the town. He looks forvvard to further clean up of the area.
Henry Pratt thought that the new elevated tank should be painted.
Greg Amsden said he wanted to see the western setback increased. He is very much in favor of
employee housing. He stated that more direction is needed from the Town Council.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the request in accordance with the stafrs memorandum
and condirions.
Greg Moffet asked what the material on the south side of the building was.
Rudi Fischer stated the surface was stucco over concrete on the south side . Stucco would also .
be on the trash enclosure,
Greg Moffet seconded the motion.
The request was unanimous with a vote of 5-0-1. Bob Armour abstained.
4. A request for a major SDD amendment to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office
Building, located at 1000 S. Frontage Rd./Area D, Cascade Village SDD #4.
Applicant: Gordon Pierce for.Glen Lyon Partnership
. Planner: Randy Stouder Henry Pratt stepped down.
Randy Stouder gave an overview of the request. Staff recommended approval with conditions.
He said that a full set of plans needs to be submitted before the DRB can take any action. Staff
had concerns about the strong unbroken roof line. Staff felt it needed stepping to reduce the mass
and bulk. The employee housing issue needs to be discussed by the PEC. Randy said staff wants
to work with the applicant to make minor design changes which can be worked out with the
DRB. There were four conditions of approval. It must go on to the Town Council, since it is a
major SDD amendment.
Ken O'Brien addressed the roof height problem. He could not lower the height of the roof .
without lowering the window height. It would make the office ceiling and window heights
unworkable.
Planning and Environmental Commission •
Minutes
August 14, 1995 6
s
Mike Mollica reminded everyone of what the parameters are for roof height. He stated the guidelines for roof height. .
Bob Armour said that the buiiding is too high.
Ken O'Brien said the project has been a real challenge since the site is so difficult.
Kevin Deighan was disappointed that the previously approved plan went from two employee
housing units to one. Greg Moffet would -look favorable on votiag for the project it if the roof line was brokea up.
Greg Amsden wants to jog the ridge line. He wants to stick to requiring two employee housing as
in the original approval and that the units could be on-site or off-site.
Jeff Bowen said the utilities must be underground. There musf be two employee housing units
and there must be a roofstep to break up the roof line.
Bob Armour said the building height is 47 ; but perceived differently and lower, since it is below
street level.
Ken Deighan said the current parking is 53 spaces.
Bob Armour said the original approval was for 100 spaces although the proposed was for 78. He
reminded everyone that it is 13,000 sq. ft. less than the brewery proposal.
Randy Stouder reminded everyone that there are now different uses from the brewery and
restaurant, and this also affected the parking space requirement:
Bob Armour said that snow storage was a problem. He is for two employee housing units and
burying the urilities.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to send it to Council with a recommendation for approval with the following changes to the Staff conditions:
~ That the second sentence of Condition #2 be stricken. All utilities must be
undergrounded as part of the project construction. ~ That two employee housing units be required. .
~ That the roof be stepped. The building design should be revised so that it is 18" higher on
the east side and 18" lower (than proposed) on the west side. The roof step is to occur on
the west side of the elevator tower (a 3' total step).
~ That snow storage plans be reviewed and approved by Public VVorks.
Planning and Environmernal Commission
AAinutes
August 14, i sss 7
' .
. _ . - _ - r-- _ -
Greg Moffet seconded the motion as amended. - - The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 5-0-1. Henry Pratt abstained.
5. A request for a setback variance to allow for an addition to the existing residence located
at 5119 Black Bear Lane/Lot 8, Block 2, Gore Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Ron and Chris Yaros Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an overview of the request with a change of 4 1/2' setback instead of the 4' as
stated in the Memorandum. Staff was recommending denial. George pointed out that an
unfavorable letter was received from a neighbor to the east of the lot in question. Mr. Yaros also
presented George with a letter in support of the side setback variance.
Ron Yaros, the applicant, stated he has spent a lot of time trying to enlarge his home using an old
survey. The present survey was different from the one he used and shows all the lots were shifted
in the subdivision.
John Perkins, the project architect, explained that Ron wanted an additional bath with the new
bedroom. It just made sense to expand the iiving room to the northwest. The breakfast nook was
structurally necessary to support the new bathroom and fixtures. John Perkins said they could
add onto the other side, however it would detract from the front entry of the house.
Ron Ya.ros mentioned to add onto the other side of the house you would have to put plumbing in
where no plumbing exists.
Many Sullivan, representing the adjacent Wren House, said that the Wren House had no problem
with it at all.
: John Perkins stated to move the addition to other side was a hardship, due to the location of the
trees.
Jeff Bowen asked how long the applicant has lived there and why he didn't have a survey of the
lot.
Ron Yaros said 10-11 years and that he had no survey.
Greg Amsden said he doesn't think it is necessary to encroach into the setback.
Jeff Bowen said that setbacks are important and the applicant is akeady into the setback. To
further encroach is not something he can agree to.
Greg Moffet mentioned that setbacks are there for a reason.
Henry Pratt agrees with the others and that it increases the pressure on Lot 9 and also adding
GRFA in a setback constitutes a special priveledge. It's unfortunate, since it's an improvement.
Planning and EnvironmeMal Commission
Minutes
Augusc i a, i sss 8
~
r
' Kevin Deighan said a xnore appealing plan doesn't constitute a hardship.
John Perkins said because of the interior traffic flow there is not another way to design this
addition.
Bob Armour said given the Town's rules, there is not a hardship. Under the guidelines and codes
we can't come up with a hardship. There exists a aon-coafonning sitaation.
Greg Amsdea suggested tabling this indefinitely.
John Perkins said Ron could have a deck which could go 10' into the side stetback.
Henry Pratt suggested converting the garage and building a new garage. .
1VTike Mollica said to table it to a specific date.
Jeff Bowen made a motion that it be tabled to the second meeting in September.
Bob Armour said it would give the applicant tune to withdraw since PEC does not look favorably
on this application:
Jeff Bowen amended his motion to table the request to the second meeting in October.
Bob Armour seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
6. A request for a Conditional Use Pernut to allow for an addition to the Town of Vail Public
Works Administration Building and a renovation to the Transportation and Fleet
Maintenance Buildings located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/on an unplatted tract, located
north of Vail Village, Eighth. Filing. .
Applicant: Town of Vail .
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
Andy Knudtsen briefly gave an overview with the criteria. Staff feels there are four key criteria
that are quite significant. Staff would like to see a better landscaping transition around the snow
dump. 29 spnace need to be relocated and an adequate transition between the older and newer
part of the berm. Staff would like to see housing oa the site. Staff is recommendiag approval,
with the conditions in the memorandum.
Bob Armour asked for questions on the following: Guest parking, landscaping, lighting and
details. .
Bob Armour would like an identification sign for Phase 1. Larry Grafel wanted the sign to be interior rather than on the Frontage Rd.
Planning and Environmental Commission
AAinutes
" . August 14, 1995 9
Bob Aimour said he wants it on the Frontage Rd. to direct trucks where to go. Greg Moffet asked about the underground fuel tanks and if they are going to be double walled.
Lany Grafel said the trough would have double walled pipes. Larry Grafel always felt it was ideal for housing to be located on the site. The appropriate target
was towards seasonal employees. Housing should be limited due to the nature of the industrial
activities. He looked at dormitory, cluster, bedrooms off to on side of a living azea, efficiency and
one bedroom apartments. Financing was a problem. It would be a-collective effort on behalf of
the T'own to offer limited housing. He feels 3-6 units are appropriate. Some people think it
should be more dense. 12 units of efficiency type dwellings fit the site's topography and activiries. The willingness is there, but the financing is not and how many age appropriate
questions to be answered.
Bob Armour asked where the number 12 came from. The Master plan says 3 units for Phase 1.
Larry Grafel said 3 units were in the original Master Plan. They were to be 600 sq. ft. and low
on the hillside so not to offend the neighbors. -
Bob Armour thought they should be rented rather then for sale to the prospective tenants.
Chris Hedberg said they wanted to stay as far away from the Administration Building so as to
differenriate from Public Works. There are topography constraints on the eastern ead. The
applicant needs feedback from the PEC to modify where the housing would be.
Susie Hervert said they had input from Andy Knudtsen as to what other communities are doing
and as to what to avoid.
Andy Knudtsen said it might warrant a closer look at other resorts with Keystone being the rnore
successful. Once that can be identified, the types of tenants can be identified.
Bob Armour said the type of employees will drive design.. .
Larry Grafel asked what, how much, and how it would be financed. He was concerned about the
timing of the request.
Kevin Deighan would like to see some vehicle in place to dedicate this property for employee
housing. It's a need right now and should be the incentive to get this thing moving.
Greg Moffet agrees with Kevin and thinks it is an excellent location for seasonal employees. It
should not be for families with children.
Greg Amsden agrees that housing should be a component, but does not feel it should hold up the remodel of Public Works. He wants to put the pressure on the Town of Vail. He thought we
should also be open minded to a manufactured type of housing to cut costs. He thinks we should
investigate a lower cost, but attractive manufactured product.
. Planning and Ernironmernal Commission •
Minutes
August 14, 1995 10
a
r-. r-- -
i ,
i
' Jeff Bowen stated that it vvas not Larry's job to provide housing, but to provide public works.
Z'he Town of Vail has got to get into housing. The .population in less than 10 years is going to be
half of what it is today unless we get into employee housing. T'here is a wide range of employees;
families and seasonals. With good proximity to public works, seasonal employees are ideal. The
site, with good architecture, can provide privacy and security and so it is ideal. Financing could be
a"tag along" with the Commons. There is a need to put in some timelines.
Henry Pratt said the Board is struggling with whether, to require housing in the first phase or
. second phase. Henry proposed approval with the condition that a minimum of three units be
under a building permit before a TCO of phase 2 can be issued. Iti would then put pressure on the
Council to make a decision. He doesn't think they should be for sale, but for use .by the Town as
rentals.
Bob RRcLaurin appreciated all the concern about housing. He met with Council last week and
they are supportive of continuing along these lines. We appreciate the flexibility. However, the
proposed improvements to Public Vdorks are critical; so he would like to have it resolved.
Henry Pratt asked if there was a 2 year shelf life on this proposal, thus making it 3 years down the
road.
Bob 1VicLaurin said housing couldn't be built in a specified time. But that the Town was
committed.
Bob Armour expressed the frustrations of the Board. They require housing and then Council asks
for more. The Board is tired of wrestling with this. The Town should not be treated differently
from anyone else. He doesn't care about the financing, it isn't his concem. It is too liberal and he
wants to give it to the T'own Council right now. Seasonal employees are the target. The Town as
the applicant will not be let off the hook. If it's not in the budget, then find it. It should be part of
Phase 1 as master planned, but the Board will allow it for phase 2.
Jeff Bowen made a motion that the request be approved with the additional coadition that a
minirnum of 3 units be under permif before a TCO be issued for phase 2. He also said that a
directional sign be installed as part of the -approval.
It was seconded by Henry Pratt.
The request passed unanimously with a vote of 6-0.
7. A request for a major SDD amendment, located at the Vail Athletic Club/ 352 East
Meadow Drive and more specifically described as follows:
A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, commencing at the Northeast
corner of said "Iract B; thence 1J 79°46'00" W along the Northerly line of Vail Village, First FiGng, and along the Nort6erly
line of said Tract B 622.86 feet; thence S 06°26'52" W a distance of 348.83 feet W the Southwest coroer of t6at paroel of Iand
described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County
Rxords, said comer also being the True Point of Begiming; thence S 79°04'08" E and along the Sout6edy liae of said parcel
200.00 feet to the Southeast corner t6ereof; thence N 62°52'00" E and along the Northerly line ofthat parcel of Iand described
iu Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 ia the Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78 feet to t6e Northeasterly coraer
of said parcel of Iand; said comer being on the Westedy right-of-way liae of Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fifth
Filing; thence N 2713'37" W a distsnce of 7737 feet along said Westedy right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N
, 89°29'22" W a distance of 12.80 feet to t6e Northeasterly comer of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as
Planning and Environmental Commission •
AAinules
August 14, 1995 ~ 9
~
rocorded Jenuary 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Northwesteriy 26.51 feet '
along the arc of a 37.50 feet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40°30100" whose chord bears N 53°40'00" W a
distaoce of 25.96 feet to a point of taagency; thence N 73°55'00" W and alottg said tangeot 166.44 foet; thence N 85902 1" W
a distance of 50.40 (eet to t6e Northwestedy coroer of the Mountain Haus Pamel; thence S 02°18'00" W and along the easterly
line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of 100.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner thereof; thence S 45° 13'S3" E a distance
of 38.70 feet to the 7 rue Point of Beginaing, containing 30,486 square feet, more or less.
Applicant: JWT 1987 Vail Limited Partnership, (d/b/a Vail Athletic Club), represented
by Stan Cope and Miehael Barclay
Planner: Mike Mollica
TABLED UNTIL AUGiJST 28,1995
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item until August 28, 1995.
Bob Armour seconded the motion.
The motion was unanimous with a vote of 6-0..
8. Council Reports:
• Vail Commons.
Susan Connelly said a committee has filed 'a petition. Council has an opporiunity to act on a
Master Plan for West Vail, and that no action on the Vail Commons will happen until a Master
Plan has been established.
Bob Armour stated that you can't Master Plan private property.
Mike Mollica disagreed and said giving a Master Plan to the public to approve (i.e. vote on) is
what makes this different.
Bob McLaurin said he's not sure it's petitionable. It's a murky area. Are we voting on the plan
or the development issues?
Susan.Connelly stated that we are undertaking a Master Plan for the West Vail commercial area.
It's already underway. .
Henry Pratt asked if there was a public meeting tomorrow to discuss what to do with the
property.
Andy Knudtsen said the use of the community space is what's on the, program agenda.
Susan Connelly wants to share the results of the Community Survey with the PEC.
Bob Armour said whether or not it is on the agenda; we need to get the thoughts on paper in
order to digest it a1L r Susan Connelly said Community Development is meeting with the Town Council next week to
share their goals.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
August 14, 1995 12
~ - , • ~r ,
Bob McLaurin said housing cannot be a double standard. VVe're committed to it as well as the I
Council. l1Ve just need tirne to work on the budget. VVe.are aow looking into switching the
Public Work's phasing.
9. Approval of July 24, 1995 PEC minutes.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the minutes vuith the modification of the name cha.nge on
page 3. The morion was seconded by Greg Moffet. The minutes were approved as modified with a unanimous. vote of 6-0.
Henry Pratt suggested 3-hole punched mernos.
The Board would all prefer 3-hole punched packet inforrnation.
Bob Atmour made a motion to adjourn the meeting.
It was seconded by Henry Pratt. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 6-0.
The meeting adjourned at 5:40 p.m. , Planning and Environmental Commission •
Minutes
August 14, 1995 13
_
-
, _
. .
, _ .
.
~ . . , _
`'i - . - - - OFBDINANCE N0. 13 `
_ ~ - seeies of 1995 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CFOARTER OF 7'HE T01NFI OF !/AIL,
COLOi3AlDO TO PROTECT DESIGNATED OPERD SPACE .
- - . . - - - - _ WHEREAS, 4he Yoarn Coundl has epproved an~Open:Land Plan whicFi induded a
provision to require voter approval before ihe use or ownership of a"Designated'.Open Space ,
parcel could be changed; and
VVHEREAS, the Town Council believes 4ha4 i4 is ap.propriate to freeze zoning on certain
designa4ed properties in perpetui9y unless, and ungl; a majoritynof ihe Yown of Vatl registered, _~Y.
. . . ...r.. , . : _
elec4ors decided-to remove 4he "Designated Open Spaoe° dassificaUon; and
UVHEREAS, the Towrn Council wishes to submit an emendmen4 to the Charter:of 4he
.
.
. - 1 :
_ Town of Vail to 4he registered elecfors oP the 7ovun of Vail for their vote. - -
~ . _ -
. . . , .
_ . _ • . :
` NOUV,_THEREFORE, BE.IT ORDAINED BY THE TQWN COUNCIL OF THE TOlAlN OF
, . ' ' . ' .4''
VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLL01lUS:
1. The Charter of the Tovun of Vail, Colorado is hereby amended 4o include an article
entitled Designa4ed Open Space 4o read as fotiows: .
Section 1. Designa4ed Open Space. .
As used in this Charter, Designated Open Space shall mean any interest in real property
owned by the Town of Vail which, arhether acquired by purchase, lease, donation,
condemnation, or any other means, has been dedicated by ordinance as Designated ,
Open Space. Such Designated Open Space shall not be alienated, sold, leased, or •
subjected to a zoning designation change other 4han one of 4he open space zone ~
districts identified in 4his Article, unless all terms and provisions of this article have been ~
met.
Section 2. Characteristics of Designated Open Space.
To qualify as Designated Open Space the designa4e parcel must be owned or leased by
4he Town of Vail and zoned Natural Area Preservation, Outdoor Recreation, or
Agriculture Open Space and be either.
a) environmentally sensitive lands (we4lands, riparian areas, criticai habitat iden4ified by '
the Division of NVildlife or the Riatural Fieritage Program);
b) high naturai haaard areas including the 100 year flood plain, red avalanche hazard
area, high rock fall hazard area, and high debris flow hazard area; or
c) Town of Vail parks that provide passive outdoor recreation opportunities.
. . q;`.
1
otdhwooo roo. ,a. scriss w,e9s
SeGtion 3. ~Creadon of the"Designated Open Spaoe Eoard of Trustees.
- . . - . . . . _
. . . . . , . _ . : . ~ . There shall be an apen spaoe_Boar+d of Trustees consisting of three members. The
_ - m
_ embers of the Board shall be the Town Manager, one Town of Vail Council member,
and one Pianning 8~ Environmental Commiss(oner The Town, Coundl member and the •
~ : . ; _ • - - _ _
Planning &'Ernironmental Commissioner shall be designated by their respecdve boards ~
. , . . _ : . . - _ _
- . : . . . : .
.
The Desi nated O en S ace Board shall .
.
- not pertorm any administrative functions unless..:._,
_
.
. . . . . . . ~ -
° - - expressly provided in this Charter .The Board shall
•a) make recommendations to the Town.Council of eppropriate parcels to be designated
.
. . -
.
as open space; and
.
. . , . _
'
- - b) make recommendatlons to the Town Council'ooncemin removin
- 9. . 9 Parcels froin a
Designated Open Space status.
;
.
_ a .
The Town Coundl and7or the Town Manager shall not act on any of.the`matters set forth ~
in paragraphs (a) and (b) without securing a recommendation from the Board as above
provided. The Board's recommendation shall not be binding upon the Town CounalSection 4. Creation of a Designated Open Space Parcel.
Upon unanimous recommendation from the Open Space Bosrd of Trustees concemirigya
- • . . _
parcel of land which meets the characterisUcs as set forth in this Charter, the Town Council shall consider an ordinance to include such parcel as Designated Open Space.
Every ordinance designating Open Space shail require the affitmative vote of three- -
fourths of the enUre Council for final passage.
No Designated Open Space may be sold, leased, traded, or otherwise conveyed, nor . ,
may any exclusive license or permit on such Designated Open Space land be given, nor
may any use or zone change other than one of the open space zone districts idenfified in
this Article to such Designated Open Space be peRnitted, until such disposal as set forth
in Section 5 below has been approved.
S io . Disposal of Designated Open Space.
Town Council may consider the sale, lease, trade, atienation, partition, granting of an
.
exdusive license or permit, use or aone change other than one of the open space zone
districts identified in this Article of Designated Open Space only upon receiving a `
: unanimous recommendation of such action from the Open Space Board of Trustees. - Once such recommendation is received the Town Council shall consider an ordinance
. referring such question of disposal of Designated Open Space to the reglstered electors ,
at a Town election for their acceptance or rejection. The ordinance shall give the
.
2 ' ' -
, ONlnarbe No. 19. Swip d 1996 -
. . ` 4 ,~a' " . . . , . '
. . u , . . ; . ;f k . ' ;
" -4.~u '1 i • '~•y i - _ • .
loca4ion of the land in quesdon and the fMended disposal 4hereof. Every such ordinance -
,l. . . ` - .
• . .
shall require the a9firtnative vote of three-fourths of the entire Coundl Por passage, e
Th
, _ . , , . - . . . -
:,.vote of the 'fowrn on proposed disposal 04 Designated Open Space shall be held not less
. _ .
. . . . . - . . .
- : 4han thirty days and noY later than ninety days from the date of the flnal Counal vo4e
4hereon. If no regular'Town election is to be heid vvithin the pariod prescribed in 4his -
. ~ ' . _ . " , . ' p . . ' ~ f - _ ' ' . _ • . . -
subsection, the Counal shall provide for a special election; otherwise, the vote shall be
.
.
. . _ . -
. . : .4,.... - -
held a4 4he same time as sucFi regular election, except 4hat the Council.may at its
: . ~ discretion provide for a spedal election a4 an eariier date within the prescribed period.
Copies of the proposed ordinance to dispase of Designated Open Spaoe shall be made
available to the public within-a reasonable time before the elecc4ion and also at the poles
_
a4 the time of the election. - • - - -
. . ~ .
, . _ ,
.
- 2. _ If any part, section, subsection, serrtenoe, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any ;
. . _ - -
. reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining por4ions of
this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares i4 would have passed 4his ordinance, and
each part, section, subsection, sentence, ciause or phrase 4hereof, regardless of the fact tha4
any one or more parts, sections, subsecfions, sen4enoes, dauses or phrases be declared
-
invalid. - ,
3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is .
necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants - : 4hereof. - ~ -
4. The repeal or the repeal and reenaCtment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
. provided in 4his ordinance shali not affect any righ4 which has accrued, any duty imposed, any _
' violation tha4 oxurred prior to the effeo4ive date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any .
, other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted.' The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or e
any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressty stated herein.
5. e411 bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsisten4 herewith are
repealed 40 the exten4 only of such inconsis4ency. This repealer shall no4 be construed Yo revise
any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, 4heretofore repealed. .
lNl'RODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED '
PUBLISHED ONCE IfV FULL, this 5th day of September, 1995. A public hearing shall be held . , _
. . . . .:K'r
. 3 -
ordhmw ?m.,asoft* m,M
.
hereon on the 19th day of September, 1995, at the regular meebng of the Town Council of the f L
Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Muniapal Building of the Town.
. . , . r .
Margaret A. Ostertoss, Mayor
AITEST: _ : - _ - - -
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
, this 19th day of September, 1995.
- Margaret A. Ostertoss, Mayor _
ATTEST: -
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk 4 _
_ OrCMianoslb. 13. Serise a11885
tl
D L
~ ee
e4
1! OW1 tlOlf' WlIlIL -
75 South F'rontage Itoad Department of Community 1)eveloprrient
- Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-21381479-2139
FAX 970-474-2452 - TO: Vail Town Councii
FROM: Administration & Community Development
DATE: September 5,1995
SUBJECT: Protection of Designated Open Space
Staff: Tom Moorhead and Russ Forrest
U. PURPOSE°
The purpose of this memorandum is to discuss a means of increasing pro4ection of Town ofi Vail
owned parks and open space parcels. The Comprehensive Open Lands Plan identified next
steps to better protect Town of Vail open space. An issue raised during the development of the
Plan uvas thafi parcels zoned as either IVatural Area Preservation, Agriculture Open Space, or
Outdoar Recreation can be changed by the Vail Town Council. IY wras also felt that property
owners may be hesitant to donate land to the Town knowing the Towrn could rezone the property
to any existing Town zone district.
00e BACKGROUNDo
A key next step in fhe Open Lands Plan was to develop an ordinance or charter amendment that
required voter approval before the use of a"designated" open space parcel could be changed.
To designate a parcel as open space, the Town Council would pass a ordinance identifying a
parcel (most likely Town owned) as "designated open space." This could have the effect of
fireezing zoning on that property in perpetuity unless a majority of Vail voters in a referendum
clecided to remove the designated open space classification.
Staff has contacted the cities of Boulder and Denver to obtain copies of their ordinances on
protecting open space and park lands. The Boulder City Charter requires approvat by both the
_ City Open Space Committee and Town Council before land can be sold.. IY also provides a
process whereby the general public through a referendum could overturn ihe Town Council's
vote to dispose of open space. Denver, as part of the City Charter., prohibits fhe City from
disposing of designaYed parlc lands. If the Cify would want to dispose of park land, the City
would have to amend its charter to allowr for the disposal of a specific parcel.l'his requires a vote
og the people. Also the Denver Charter states that public property cannot be compromised for
other purposes. As a result there is protection ofi park land from transmission lines and other
utilify corridors, which could affect park values. Both Denver and Boulder, allow for significant
flexibility in providing for a wide variety of uses on park lands and open space. Denver can even
change zoning on park lands to allow for more intensive recreational activities or conversely can
place a more restricYive zoning on open lands.
RECYCLED PAPER '
~
s
. . . . . . . , . ' .
~
III. STAFF RECOMAAENDATION:
On May 2, 1995, staff presented several alternatives to further protect Town owned open space.
Options included using conservation easements to permanently protect open space, creating an
ordinance or charter amendment that would require a vote of the people before designated open
space could be sold or rezoned. After reviewing the Town Councils comments from this
worksession, staff would like to recommend creating a Charter Amendment that woutd create a .
open space commission and require a vote of the people before designated properties could be
sold, leased, or have the zoning changed to a non open space zone district. The open space
commission would include the Town Manager, 1 Town Council Member, and 1 Planning and .
Environmental Commissioner. There would be two basic function of a Charter Amendment: _
1) designating parcels as open space and 2) removing parcels from a designated status.
Dssi nating, Parcels - Staff recommends that properties be placed in a designated status based on whether a parcel
met specific criteria. Staff could assist in recommending parcels for designation using these _
criteria. Then the Open Space Commission would review staff's recommendation and vote on .
designating a-property as open space. Then the Town Council would have to pass an ordinance
upon an affirmative vote from the Open Space Commission to place a property in a designated
status. Specific criteria for placing parcels in.a designated status include:
a) parcels must be zoned Natural Arsa Preservation (NAP), Outdoor Recreation (OR), or .
Agriculture Open Space (AOS).
b) environmentally sensitive lands (wetlands, riparian areas, critical habitat identified by the Division of Wildlife or the National Heritage Program).
c) High natural hazard areas including the 100-year floodplain, red avalanche hazard
area, high rockfall hazard area, and high debris flow hazard areas.
d) Town Parks that provide passive outdoor recreation opportunities.
* A parcel must meet criteria (a) and one of the following criteria (b-d)
. Disposing of a DesiQnated Parcel .
The Charter Amendment would require the following before a parcel of land that is designated
open space could be sold, leased, or rezoned to any zone district other than the Natural Area
Preservation, Outdoor Recreation, or Agriculture Open Space: .
1) Unanimous vote of the Open Space Commission.
2) A three quarters (3/4) vote from the Town Council to create a ballot issue to sell or .
significantly change the use of a parcel designated as open space.
3) A majority vote of registered voters in the Town of Vail.
~3 . - - . . .
a _
OVo ~~eps
If the above recommendations are acceptable to the Town Council, staff recommends that
language be prepared immediately for a Charter Amendmen4 and a ballot issue for the November
election.
~ _ _ ,
RESOLUT90N BVO. 21
- , SERIES OF 1995
A RESOLUTBOtV AnAENDlIVG T9iE VOliVN OF !/AIL
DEFERRED COIVIPENSATVON PLAN.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail established a deferred compensation plan in April of 1981; and
WHEREAS, on July.18, 1995 the Town of Vail terminated the ICMA Deferred Compensation
Plan that had been.established on December 18, 1984, and decided to cease using Great West for
new contributions for the Town of Vail Deferred Cornpensation Plan and to use new investment
providers for the Town of Vail Deferred Compensation Plan; and
WHEREAS, a review of the Town of Vail Deferred Compensation Plan's plan document
revealed that the definition of eligible employee, did not accurately reflect their intent.
iVOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado that:
The Town of Vail Deferred Compensation Plan be amended by deleting Section 7.02
of the Plan in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
"7.02. ENdPLOVEE mearas aray person, excludang incfepencient contractors and
seasonal eanp8oyees; who perEorms seavaces for the Employer as aregaaBac fu@I-
tiene Employee and who receides compensation from the Employer for the
servBces performec9."
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AIVD ADOPTED this _ day of , 1995.
Margaret A. Osterfoss, Niayor
ATTEST:
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk
C:\RES01-1.19421
, Fesolution No. 21, Series ot 1995
,
,
j
RE.e9OLUTION NO. 22
SEFi9ES OF 1995
A RESOL9JT10N APPROVING AND AUTHOFiIZ9NG TBiE
ACCEPTANCE OF A SETTLEIIAEN'T AGREEAAEtVT AND RELEASE
ON C6!!0L ACT601V NOo 93-CV-88, THE TOWN OF 1/A9L @/S.
CWE.tlRON mdS91y IItl6f. PiEl6J P9~OCO OIIkO &9OMPP9NQ
VVHEREAS, fhe Tovun Council authorized the commencement in the Districfi Cour4, County
of Eagle, State of Colorado, Civil Action No. 93-CV-88, the Town of Vail vs. Chevron US,4, Inc. and
Amoco Oil Co. on or about iVlarch 19, 1993; and
VVHEREAS, a settlement agreement has been reached vvhich in ifis principle part causes
Chevron to remediate any ground water contamination; and
WHEREAS, the agreement provides that the Tovvn of Vail will assume responsibility for any
state required remediation of any soil contamination now existing on the Old Town Shop lot.
NOVV, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, Yhat:
1. The settlement agreement and release in the Town of Vail vs. Chevron USA, Inc. and
Amoco Oil Co. attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A is hereby approved and adopted.
2. The Town fi/lanager and the Town staff are hereby authorized to take all actions
necessary to implement this settlement agreement and release.
3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
IPVTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of September, 1995. Margaret A. Ostertoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk
C:\RESOLU94.22
: r
~
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
1. PARTIESt ,
a. The Town of Vail ("Town"), a home rule municipality
organized under the laws of the State of Colorado.
b. Chevron USA, Inc. ("Chevron"), a Pennsylvania corpora-
tion, having its.principal place of business at San Francisco,
California.
c. Amoco Oil Co. ("Amoc:o"), a Maryland corporation, having
its principal place of business at Chicago, Tllinois.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE:
The effective date of this agreement is February 10, 1994.
3. RECITALS: a. The Town owns a parcel of property situated at 890 South
Frontage Road in the Town of Vail, Colorado (the "Town Site").
Amoco owns the adjacent property located at 934 South Frontage.
Road; that parcel was earlier owned by Chevron (the "Chevron
5ite"). A creek runs along the southern edge of both properties.
b. On or about March 19, 1993, the Town commenced an action
in the District Court, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, Civil
Action No. 93-CV-88, captioned as follows: The Town of Vail v.
Chevron USA, Inc. and Amoco Oil Co. alleging generally that the
release of petroleum products stored on the Chevron/Amoco property
had contaminated soil and groundwater on the Town Site. Chevron
and.Amoco answered the complaint filed by the Town, denying lia-
bility. .
c. The parties desire to settle all claims between the Town
on the one hand and Chevron and Amoco on the other relating to soil
and groundwater contamination on the Town Site and any damages, ex-
penses or costs related thereto.
4. AGREEMENTS:
a. Chevron will, at its sole cost and expense, undertake all
reasonable steps to remediate the groundwater contamination now
existing on the Town Site to the standards required by the Colorado
Department of Health or the State Oil Inspector (the "State")
whether the requirements are -pursuant to the State of Colorado
Basic Standards for Groundwater, which are currently codified at 5
C.C.R. 1002-8 (3.11.0), another regulation or an order (the "Stan-
dards"). The Standards now require remediation of the benzene in
~
the groundwater to a level of five parts per billione The parties
recognize that the State may change the benzene standard, in which
case the new standard shall apply. Any other changes to the Stan-
dards adopted and effective before remediation of the grounclwater
is completed will govern the remediatione 1Votwithstanding the
foregoing, remediation of the groundwater shall be deemed completeci
when the State issues a written notice to the Town in accordance
with the requirements of § 25-18-104 (11), C.R.S. stating that the
Town's Site has been remediated, and that no further action is
_ required (the "Closure Letter")e
ba (1) If Chevron determines that it is not reasonable to
attain remediation to the Standards and desires to request an
alternative standard for the remediation from the Stateo Chevron
will provide the Town with notice of its decisiona The Town magr,
at its option, retain technical consultants and counsel to cieter-
mine whether Chevron's proposed alternative standard is reasonable
under the circumstancese Chevron will pay the reasonable costs of
the Town's technical review anci legal services relating to Chev-
ron's proposal. The Town shall be provided daith all data generated
or maintained by Chevrom or its consultants relating to the site
and a reasonable amount of time to consicier Chevron°s proposale
(2) If the Town does not agree that Chevron°s proposed
alternative is reasonable, Chevron will retain Dre Jerry Zimpfero
whether he is employed by Harding Lawson Associates or another en-
tity, to evaluate all relevant information regarding Chevron°s pro-
posal and determine whether it is technically feasible for Chevron
to attain remediation to the Standardse Both parties expect that,
in reaching his determination, Dre Zimpfer shall exercise his in-
dependent professional judgment, and he shall consider technologies
and systems then in use in the State of Coloradoe Dr< Zimpfer~
shall prepare a written report of his professional opinion regarci-
ing Chevron's proposal ("Zimpfer Report")o A copy of the Zimpfer
Report, and any draft thereofo shall be delivered to the Town at
the same time it is delivered to Chevrona
(3) If the Town°s consultant disagrees with Dre
Zimpfer's conclusions or recommendations, the Town°s consultanto
. Dr. Zimpfer and Chevron shall confer with each other and make a
good faith effort to resolve their differences and agree upon an
acceptable standarde If they are able to agree upon a standard to
which the groundwater should be remediated, Chevron shall utilize
that standard in remediating the groundwater. The Town will then
cooperate in Chevron°s effort to obtain State approval of that
agreed upon alternative.level of remediationo If the Town°s con-
sultant, Chevron and Dr. Zimpfer are unable to agree upon a stan-
dard to which the groundwater should be remediated, Chevron and the
Town shall each present their respective positions regarding the
alternative levels to the Statee The State°s determination may be
appealed, if provided for by lawe
-2-
~
c. In order to remediate the groundwater, Chevron will need
to extend the groundwater remediation system currently on the
Chevron Site to the Town's Site. A third party has discussed with
the Town the possibility of using the Town Site to access property
across the creek, which will require the construction of a bridge
on the Town Site. The discussions are preliminary in nature. The
Town will provide Chevron with whatever information, if any, is in
the Town's possession concerning the locatiQn of the proposed
bridge across the creek and the associated access road.so that the
groundwater remediation system can be designed and constructed in
a manner to avoid damage from the construction of the road and
bridge and from the use of the road and bridge by vehicles and
heavy equipment and Chevron shall so design and construct the sys-
tem. To the extent the Town has waived its sovereign immunity, the
Town shall be responsible for any damages to the groundwater re-
mediation system caused by the negligence or the willful acts of
its employees and agents. The Town shall have no responsibility
for any damages caused to the groundwater remediation system by its
independent contractors. As to the third party that may construct
a bridge on the Town Site, the Town shall have no responsibility
for any damages caused to the groundwater remediation system by the
third party so long as the Town conditions any agreement of access
to build and use such a bridge on the third party's agreement to
indemnify Chevron for cost of system repair or replacement occa-
sioned.by such use or construction.
d. The groundwater remediation system shall be designed to
allow for the use of the property by vehicles and heavy equipment.
Chevron will provide the Town a reasonable amount of time to review
and comment on Chevron's proposed design for the groundwater reme-
diation system to be constructed. Chevron will pay the Town's rea-
sonable technical consultant costs, if any, for that review. The
Town shall have no liability for damage to the system unless•such
damage results from willful or negligent conduct by the Town. Once
the groundwater remediation system is constructed on the Town's
Site, Chevron will deliver to the Town three sets of "as built"
drawings for the system. The Town, its employees, agents and inde-
pendent contractors shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy of
the drawings in conducting any excavation or other activities on
the Town's Site.
e. The Town hereby grants to Chevron a limited, non-exclusive
license to enter upon the Town's Site for the following purposes
only:
1. to construct, install, maintain, inspect, test, operate and
abandon wells and associated equipment; and
2. to maintain, inspect, test, operate and abandon those certain
groundwater monitoring wells currently located on the Town's
Site.
-3-
i
Chevron ancl its contractors shall provide prior reasonable notice
to the Town of drilling or other construction activities, including
the abandonment of any well and shall cooperate with the Town in
scheduling such activities so as reasonably to minimize disruption
of Town use of its propertye The Town°s contact for coordination
and scheduling is: Russell Forrest, Senior Environmental Officer,
telephones 303-479-2146e . ~
f. The groundwater monitoring wells currently located on the
Town°s Site shall be monitored and tested by..Chevron in accordance
with State requirements.
g. If a drill rig is taken onto the Town°s Site, the rig
shall be decontaminated before arrival on the Town°s Site, and all
equipment shall be decontaminated between drilling locationso All
drill cuttings, decontamination fluids and purgeci water shall be
contained and properly disposed of off-sitee Drilling fluicls that
could interfere with the interpretation of any data shall not be
usedo Soil borings shall be filled with grout upon completione
Any well installed shall be finished at or below ground surface<
Chevron, its agents or independent contractors shall provide all
notices and obtain all approvals required by any governmental or
quasi-governmental entity prior to the drilling or abandonment of
any wells.
ho The Town will assume responsibility for any State-required
remediation of any soil contamination now eacisting on the Town
Site. The Town will provide Chevron with all reports concerning
current soil contamination levels and concerning any remediation
efforts relating to soil contaminatione
- i. Each party shall deliver to the other party a copy of any
document which is submitted to the State or the United States Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") and which relates to the
contamination at the Town's Site or the Chevron Siteo The copy of
any such document shall be delivered to the other party',at the time
it is delivered either to the State or the EPAe
j. The Town, for itself, its successors and assigns, re-
leases and discharges Chevron and Amoco and their successors, as-
signs, subsidiaries, parents, affiliates, officers, ciirectors, anci
employees and agents, from any and all causes of actions, judg-
ments, claims, rights, damages, charges, liabilities, and demands
of any nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, arising out of
or relating to the contamination currently on the Town°s Sitee
ke The Town assigns to Chevron any claim it may have against
third parties related to the current groundwater contamination on
the Town Sitee
1. Chevron shall indemnify, defend and hold the Town harmless
from any and all liabilities, claims, damages, losses, suits or de-
_4_
mands of any nature arising out of.or relating to: (1) the ground-
water contamination now existing on the Town Site; and (2) any ac-
tivities conducted on the Town's Site pursuant to this Agreement by
Chevron, its directors, officers and employees, its agents, or its
independent contractors.
M. Except for the specific undertakings assumed by Chevron
under this Agreement, this Agreement is not intended to define any
rights or liabilities between Chevron and Amoco relating to the
subject matter of the Civil Action, Chevron and Amoco agreeing that
those rights and liabilities are defined in other written agree-
ments between them.
n. Chevron has advised the Town of an agreement between
Amoco and Chevron concerning any future releases at the Chevron
Site. No obligation of Amoco.thereunder to respond to future re-
leases will relieve Chevron of its obligation to the Town to per-
form the remediation contemplated above, nor does the agreement
between Amoco and= Chevron create any duties or rights between Amoco
and the Town.
o. Within five (5) days of all parties executing this Agree-
ment, the parties shall file a Motion and Stipulation for Dismissal
With Prejudice in Civil Action No. 93-CV-88, providing that all
parties will bear their own costs, expenses and legal fees. The
parties hereto authorize and instruct their attorneys of record to
file all documents necessary for the entry of an orcier of dismissal
with prejudice of Civil Action No. 93-CV-88.
p. Chevron shall require any independent contrac.to= conduct-
ing any activity on the Town' s Site to purchase and maintain insur-
ance that will protect the contractor, Chevron, if it so desires,
and the Town from the claims set forth below that may arise out of -
or result from any activity on the Town's Site:
1. claims under workers' compensation, disability benefits artd
other similar employee benefit acts;
2. claims up to one million dollars for bodily injury, occupa-
tional sickness or disease, or death of the contractor's em-
ployees or other persons;
3. claims up to one million dollars for property damage; and
4. claims up to one million dollars for bodily injury or death of
any person, or for property damage arising out of the owner-
ship, maintenance or use of any motor vehicle.
Each contractor's insurance policy shall identify the Town as an
additional insured. Prior to beginning any work on the Town's
Site, Chevron shall require a11 contractors to provide the Town
with a certificate of insurance from an insurance company that is
. -5-
a,
licensed to do business in a state of the United 5tates and quali-
fiecl to cio business in Coloracioo
5e MISCELLARTEOUSs
a. This Settlement Agreement and Release shall be governed
by the laws of the State of Coloradoo
bo This Settlement Agreement and Release shall be binding
upon anci inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors,
assigns, subsidiaries, parents, affiliates, officers, directors,
employees and agentse
. C. The parties to t his Settlement Agreement and Release
represent that they have reacl and understood the contents of this
Settlement Agreement and Release; that they have executeci it volun-
tarily and.upon advice of counsel; that they have not been in-
fluenced by any persons or attorneys; and that they unclerstand that
after signing this Settlement Agreement and Release, the parties
cannot sue or institute further.suit or make.further claim against
each other for any claim arising out of the contamination currently
on the Town' s Site; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not
prevent or otherwise estop any party from commencing an action to
enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreemento
de This Settlement Agreement represents and expresses the
entire agreement of the parties hereto and may be modified or
changed only by a written instrument signed on behalf of all par-
tiese iVo waiver by any party, whether express or implied, of any
of the provisions of this Settlement Agreement or of any breach or -
default of any party, shall constitute a continuing waiver or a
waiver of any other provision of this Settlement Agreemente -
eo Any notices requireci by the terms of this Settlement
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand, tele-
copy or certified mail, prepaid., return receipt requested addressed
to the following:
The Town: The Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Attentiona R. Thomas Moorhead, Esqe
Telecopy RTumber: 303-479-2.157
With a copy to< Cockrell, Quinn & Creighton-
1700 Broadway, Suite 1516
Denver, CO 80290
Attention> Florence J. Phillips, Esqe
Telecopy Numbers 303-860-7344
-6-
.
Chevron: Chevron USA Product Company, Inc. Law Department
6001 Bollinger Canyon Road
P. 0. Box 5044
San Ramon, CA 94583
Attention: Jon M. Robbins, Esq.
Telecopy Number: 510-842-3365
With a copy to: Holland & Hart
555 17th Street, Suite 2900
Denver, CO 80201
Attention: Wiley E. Mayne, Esq.
Telecopy Number: 303-295-8261
Notice shall be deemed given when personally delivered, mailed or
telecopied, so long as receipt of the telecopy is confirmed by the
receiving party. Pursuant to the terms of this provision, each
party may specify.a different address for the giving of any notice.
'f. Each person executing this Agreement represents and war-
rants that he or she has the authority and power to bind his or her
party to the terms and conditions herein.
g. This agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts
each of which shall be deemed an original. When signed by both.
parties, this agreement shall be effective as of February 10, 1994.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Settlement Agreement and Release on the dates stated hereunder.
THE TOWN OF VAIL CHEVRON USA, INC.
By: gy;
Its: Its:
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
By:
Its:
-7-
4
A
S.TATE OF ~
) sso
COUNTY OF ~
The foregoing instrument was acknowleciged before me this
day Of , 19_, by , as
of
Witness my hand anci official seala
Notary Public
My commission expirese
STATE OF ~
) ssa
COURTTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day o f , 1 g_, by o aS
of
Witness my hand and official sealo
Notary Public -
My commission expiresa -
STATE OF
) sso .
COUIVTY OF ~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day o f , 19_1 bY , as Witness my hancl and official seale
Notary Public
My commission eacpiress • '
-8-
'
~
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
HOLLAND & HART ~
COCKRELL, QUINN & CREIGHTON
By gy
Wiley E. Mayne, #2631 Richard M. Foster, #9726
Craig Stewart, #17539 Florence J.. Phillips, #14262
555 17th Street, Suite 2900 1700 Broadway, Suite 1516
P. O. Box 8749 Denver, CO. 80290
Denver, CO 80201 303-860-7140
303-295-8000
ATTORNEYS FOR CHEVRON USA TOWN OF VAIL
PRODUCTS COMPANY and
AMOCO OIL COMPANY .
By
R. Thomas Moorhead, #22445
Tawn Attorney
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
303-479-2107
ATTORNEYS FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL
' 351366. - 9 -
Y . .
dd
e4
TOHN OF ~AIL
75 South Frontage Road Off ce of the Town Maiiager
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Robert W. McLaurin
Town Manager
DATE: September 1, 1995
SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report
ROUNDABOUT UPDATE
The Roundabout is substantially complete, with the exception of the final lift of asphalt. The
contractor will pull off the site for the Labor Day weekend and will resume work on Tuesday. It is
our intention to close this intersection on the 18th and 19th of September in order to complete the
final paving of the project. This project will be complete prior to the Celtic Festival which begins on
September 20th.
SLIFER PLAZA CONCRETE SLABS
Several weeks ago Sybill Navas expressed concern about the condition of the concrete in the Slifer
Plaza area. She indicated that it had deteriorated and questioned if it should be replaced.
The cost for repaving this area with concrete is approximately $125,000. To replace the concrete
with brick pavers would be approximately $150,000. Please note this does not include the cost to
heat any of the pavers. This item is not currently programed. If you want to proceed with this
project, it will be necessary to include it in the capital budget.
HAAGEN-DAZ BUS STOP
There was also a question several weeks ago about paving the dirt area in front of the Haagen-daz
Ice Cream Shop. This area is partially on Town of Vail right-of-way and partially on private property.
Todd Oppenheimer is currently developing a cost to install pavers. We are also exploring the
possibility of a joint effort between Crossroads and the Town of Vail to improve this area.
NATURE CENTER ROAD
Tom Steinberg had indicated that the road to the Nature Center was in poor repair. We have
contacted the VRD who is responsible for this area and have not yet received a response from
them.
RECYCLED PAPER
LANDSCAPING NORTH OF RUSSELL'S
Todd Oppenheimer is currently doing some additional design work to carry the pocket park through
Gore Creek Drive and will develop the cost associated with this.
SEIBERT CIRCLE UPDATE
As you are aware, we are planning to construct Seibert Circle this fall. We are currently negotiating
with Hyder Construction to do this work.
It appears that the construction schedule is as follows:
September 11 - 22 excavation and utility installation
September 25-29 install pavement heating system
October 2-21 install pavers
This is a very tight schedule and we will need to work very diligently to keep it on track. At this point
we are waiting for the final design for storm sewer and the grading plan.
We are aware that this schedule conflicts with the Celtic Festival and the Oktoberfest, but if we
intend to finish this before the snow flies we have not choice but to proceed. As you will recall, it
was the desire of the Golden Peak Developer as well as other merchants at the upper end of Bridge
Street to construct this project this fall
AROSA DRIVE A-FRAME
We exercised the option on the A-frame at the bottom of Trapper's Run. This closing was held
Friday afternoon. The funds for this purchase were taken from the housing fund. The rental lease
on this property expires August 31 and we have indicated that they may remain for the month of
September, pending the Council's decision on what you wish to do on this property. The four
tenants who currently occupy this residence qualify as full time employees as defined in the TOV
Housing Guidelines. They are interested in signing a one year lease.
RWM/aw
C:\Townmgr.rpt
<.3f1'ic~- of thc ISp1rd o( C:oiTnnisxicmcrs T.:aggIc ('ouaty Ruililing
(970) 328-860S f'.U. 13ox RSO
Fax: (970) 328-7207 . .Sl)tl Ilmadway
'n>n: (970)szs-x79n ' i~.,t;ie, C',x,I~~raJc~ 8 163i-oKSC~
.
e4ugus& 31, 1995 - 91:9 7
1~GLE (CO , COLORADO
AGENDA .
muARD . F %C;4' NTY AAMISSI~IU~R
~~~ULAR MEEToNG DAY
SEPTEMBER 59 1995
e o~ a ir 4 iS tr a oa o n o c o n a 4 k{} * b A fl a n o a v o 0 0 0 0 o R tY '
a:30 - 10:00 WORK SESS80N - PENDBNG UTIGATIOR4
James R. Fritze, Coun4y Attorney
90o00 - 10:96 BREAK
40e15 - 11o15 . WORK SESS80N - WEEKLY UPDATE
l909s - 92.0ff BREAK
92000 - 1_30 LUE~CH
9:30 - 1:45 CpPDSENT CALENDAR IHewm oi o rou46ie end non-coMmverelal nature are pleced an the mneen9 caiendar4o a9ow4he Board otCounlyCurmnieWaneis pc spend ks g„e
afld energy an mmre Imvorlantltemson a langthq egenda, Aqy Cuntmissioner rtmy requeetthafan pom bs 9iEiNOYED° Goen tho omisentcelander
and cans"sdmrad wM1a49ltl. A11y ffmmbmr of tlhe publie may °REi3t.lESI" erry ilem be °REQAOVED° Prnn the Cermnt AAende.
1. B1L4.. PAY9NG ~ .
Linda Pankuch, Accounting
NHark S;lverthom, Controiler
AC4EORl: Approval subjecg 4o review by Qhe Chairman.
2. CHANt°sE ORDER NU~~~R TWO FOR THE 1996 PAaVING
C0~TRACV
Don Fessler, Road and Bridge Direc4or
ACT8O N: Consider Approval
i
.
I
3. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRA1VSPORTAMON
SURPLUs EQviPMENT PRoGRAM AssuRANCE {Airporq
Dart Reynolds, Airpor4 Manager
ACTBONo Consider approval
k!o ~OUAHTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATBQN TQ HEAR THE
RECOM~ENDATION~ OF TFIE HEAPJNG OFFICF-R
REGARDIR4G THE HEAR?NG RESUL7ING FROM .
EQUAUZ1NG PROPERTY VAL4JAT11ONS THttOl!GH09.8T
EAGLE C0UNTY
Rober4 Loeffler, Assis4ant CoUnty AYtomey ACT8ONo Consider approval- ------------------------5. RESOLUTBON REGARD1NG THE CORRECTlONS TO THE
PET6TION$ T0 THE EAGLE COUNTY BOe4RD OF
EQo.~~~IZAr*14
Roberf Loeffler, Assis4arat County Attomey
ACTION: Consider approval. a. RESOLl9TIORl ADOPTGiVG RlULE3 QiN~ PROCEDURES FOR
ARBBTItATBON AND. APPOINTENG ARBITRATORS FOR
APPIEALS FROM DEC@SION OF THE 1995 ARD OF
1~QUALIZATBON
Rober4 Laeffler, Assis4ant Caunty Attomey
ACTION: Consider approval.
9'As - 2e00 A. INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEAAENTS BE1fVYEEN ~GLE
CO1.9NT1f, S7'ATE OF COLORADO AtVD ALL POUTICAL
5UBD1VtS9ONS PARTBCIPATIlVG 9M tHE 9995
COORDBNATED WiAIL ~~OT ELEC710N
Sara Fisher, Eagle Counfy Clerk & RecordQr
ACTION: Consider approeal.
M RESOLUTSOPd AIDTHOPiOZING DRAVIIIlVG OF LE3TE12 OF
CREDtT FOR a1D9a0 FoR BAsALr TRADE AssOc~ATES
James Fritze, County Attomey
ACTION: Consider approval.
6o00 ° be181 FIN9`9L SEB 6LEItl6ENNS WUTH 6"OaORRY aS 69EAtl i 7'1M6/ @oERS °
THREE Co~TRAcTs (#c95 10960 AND #C95 12260 AND
THE CHeP sEAL PRoJECT)
Don Fessler, Road and Bridge Direc4or
George Roussos, Coun4y Engineer
ACTION: Consider approval.
2096 _ 2046 CONTINU6NG DtSCLOSUR€ UAIDERTAiQNG AF9D
ESCROW AGREEhRENT A11D ASSOCIATED DOCl9AAENTS
FOR SALES TREVENUE REFU6VDING BONDS
RoberQ Loeffler, Depaaty Coun4y Atfiorney
~~~ONe Consider appPOVaI.
2:45 - 31.00 RESOLUT90M REGARDBNG EICCHANGE O~ REAL
PROF"ERT'Y AND POWER OF ATTTOEtNEY (AIRPORT -
LEHMANN)
3ames R. Fritze, County A4tomey
ACT6ONe Consider approval.
-
3o00 _ S09~ ~REAK
3:19 - 4e00 WORK SESSlOR! - MEETIIVGS ATTENDED
. . . , . , _ t. . .
TO1E AIEXT AAEEY1IdG OF TP4E @AGLE COi1NTY COAWAA1S5fOMERS tAALL BE HELD OPl SEPTEAABER 91, 9M
ALL d9EEYlN08 WLt B@ H@LD IiM 'PH@ F-/1pt-E (.OUPJTy OUILOIN4 - SOC BROAOWAY, EAOLE- OR OTMERYWSE W0Te9.
THIS AGEPIDA IS PROVIC]ED FOR IPdFORMATIOPdAL pURPOSES OdLY - ALL T1RAE5 AfiE APPROXI6Am77'E.
TM BOARD iflRiILE IfV SESSIOtd AAAY CORISIDER OTFIER ITERAS TP11iT ARE BROUGFIT BEFORE 1T.
r
•
.
~
. d i` J r~ ~ r'^~~~ r~,°~''~.~+ ~ G , , ~ f~ YI,
p!`4 M ~~~j C~ t`S ~ F y• i %7J
7 • . . .
, Avon.-,A,reb i nt l ar
f.. .d~ scourse
. , . , . . . _
from ~
I Co'mmons'
By Andrew.
Daily Staff Wnter . ~ • , _
WaIl&t'tb aldd flIIIly
`'AVOW,~=~"~Locals„womed about .
plans to: annex-1,789, acres to Avon vog~e anq~ ~uggestwe
learned a thing or two from the Vail
Commons .pulilic-input problems $lo~' flt d6DwIl and
last.month. ' • . : ' In Vail, folks worked fhemseives ~~~~t -~vhag •
into a tizzy oyer. plari`s to de'velop a ~'QDB~.'1Ce a~9o~lltt .$o 6~6e»
City Market nezi td:Safeway in West , •
Vail after the Vail counciNlready'.. ' _~',us Ni~holson. had moved forward with"a proposal:
Avon r'esidents. worried' about of Minturn,
Magnus , Lindholm's'. plans don't to the Avon council
'want to inake'the sarrie mistake. '
Localshave organized'a'group'to ' - , give the Avon council their side of • the story bef re it's too late. property.
"Our p~n~d"ry message:is that we "I feet;,13,ycanvassing the commu-
want to avoid another situation like nity, they say, `Slow it down, slow it '
Vail Coinmons," said Bob Doyle, down,"' he told the council. "You're '
owner of Bob's Place restaurant in: building a whole new city. It's just
Avon and an Eagle-Vail resident starting .to hit them. That's why who helped otganize Citizens foc a You'ra getting late input on this.".
Better Avon. ' Eagle-Vail residents are worried
; 1Vlembers of the group attended about increased [raffic on Highway
Tuesday's council meeting to raise 6 as well as talk about building an
their concerns over traffic and.access Interstate 70 interchange - in_ the to Lindholm's plans to add 1 million vicinity.
square feet of commercial develop- The Avon council approved'four
ment and more hoines and town= measures that begin formal annexa- 1
houses to the area. tion proceedings for the project on S
,"That's why we're'coming to the. Tuesday, including the first reading h
table now to work with the town and of aa annexation ordinance and a, a
the developer to address our grow- resolution to set a Nov. 7 election to il
ing concerns. Our goal is not to stop reimburse the developer part of the, S.
this development," he said. cost of public roads. '
Doyle saicl locals are just starting ' Still, ' members of the public t,
to understand the scope, of Lind- urged the council to take the slow S
holrr?'s project, which would double, road with the project. . c
the number of ezisting stores already "I want to.add my voice and, sug- ~
in town and, increase traffic in and gest we slow it down and think about:; v
out of Avon as new residents drive what you're,about to do," said Gus.,
to and from homes proposed for the Nicholson, a Minturn resident:.. •
,
.
- - - P
a l • ~ y
. . . _ .
A~[~$
' ~ J T'• ~ Vs0 PS Y n
. Roundab0
,
. . . . . V ~ a : . _
. ~
From Page 22 f
~
circle of green in the middle with "
trees or flowers. Montpelier's was Ig's Vea~~aoaag's 1Far$~
shaved back to a smal] oasis with a
single tree to make more room for roundaboug and •
trucks. It cost $120,000, including ghere's OIEl go ~De a
the slice of land. g ~
~
Karen McCarthy, a paralegal, learnyng,Curve here°»
~ a~•3 said the first time she drove through
the roundabout, other drivers -Douglas Hoyt
appeared as confused as she was. Police chief
"Cars were going through in oppo-
site directions," she said.
Many of those who already
know the rules of the round roads speeds that you have in round•
R , such as the one about drivers in abouts, chey're very forgiving ol
the circle having the right of way - any error a driver might make."
AP photo grew up with roundabouts or their V?ell, somewhat forgiving.
Cars circle the new roundabout in Niontpelier, Vt., Tuesday. Ver- higher-sPeed relative, the traffic "I haven't heard of any crashes
even near-misses," said Glenn Ger
mont's first-ever roundabout will slow traffie, cut pollution and circle. shaneck, Vermont's de uc secre
make the three-wa unction of roads safer for bic clists and "I was shocked the first time I p Y
yj y saw it, but I knew what to do," said tary of transportation, ``but I d(
pedestrians, according to Tony Fiedington, a planner for the state chris Cunningham, a Montpelier know that people have beer
Department of Transportation. bookseller. "I grew up in Massa- mouthing what appear to be profan
° chusetts." ities as they either move through o
RoundaDuut %ill Ewns i '-Redington said studies showed wait to get into the queue."
the circles cut accidents by 50 per- Police aren't handing out tickeL
Ve ~ ~ ~ 0% d ~ f cent and injuries by 80 percent. yet.
"If someone makes a mistake "It's Vermont's first round
and goes the wrong way, people about," said Police Chief Dougla
9 dri~~~ ~ sort of point to you and show you," Hoyt, "and there's going to be ;
he said. "Because of the slow learning curve here."
had only stop signs. Proponents say Po 00 oq
~ associated aress the circular route will cut pollution by
-MONTPELIER, Vt. - Summer- eliminating stops . and starts;. and
time, the L.egislature has adjoumed make the thtee=way jurtction nice to
look .:at and ~safer 'for -bicylists and
for the. yeac,r and. traffic moves slow- . . . . . . . . . : E , . , : . _ .
pedestnans. ~
ly,in Montpelier.sA kid~on.askate-,. z,•-:.,.:n:,.,-w
boa'rd can¢ overtake cais;in the city~s :~~+t~oblem is,may ° drivers want out
one cential.Ynteisectio'n'AA lunchtime ;~.ofthe experiment: r_ r...
' peilestrian !crosse's,theestreet without' ~~t~zji; If I_ never drov'e" throagh ;fiere ,
taking his nose'outt0f a-book., It'LLwould,be'too'soon," 'said
. , ' ' ',RotSert Jones; wlio held up traffic for
~ Nlost people whojlive and;work in ;r;, . .
the, nation's smallest capital.(pop:. •;tseveral,manutes'-while•he,"eased his
8,2(20) say ihat'`s.fine'witli tliem:,They .:t:~-foot , tractor=trailer through the
like the soothing~'p"ersonality of this tiSht cucle. " ^ , ,
town,where thepeaceis,almosfnever ' `•`"";,'~~:lt s~~ndiculous, ~ `sa• ~d
broken'by 'sirens,`car al`arnis or the {Bri~ Towne, a Federal Express
othec disturliarices°of:city,life a 6er ~"I riever realized therdrwas a.:; ~i
, Buf ;this= civic =sahsfachon, so problem;there
' uncommori where'."c u?attets aceS-°. ~ Redington, a plai?ner for the state,s
, concerned,"make`"s;Tony Redingtbn''s'~'x'. ~ Agency ; of Transpoitation; said he r::
job doubly hud:' knew.':ftie r'adjustinent', would: take": .
Redington lobbiedsuccessfully to ume. - '
~ pat Verinont's<fir`st eoriridabout.at an ~ Roundabouts usually boast a large :
:
. . Rlease see nextp, a e '
" Montpeher.mtersect?on that a. . g,
. outlying~
THE DENVER pOST .
AC
man grileyS
es .
anic
By !/irginia Culver - Gove Denver Post Religion Writer ~'O~ ~~~~9 ' ~
~ flg nothing, loans it to the government,i
VAIL - Conservative Christians which then pays interest on it forev-~
er," he said.
feel a"growing frustration" with a Christians to- learn "behind-the- about Vincent Foster, the Clinton He also holds the view of ma
government they believe lies and a scenes" information not found in the aide who committed suicide, and consei;vative Christians that Vinc nt, •
"liberal" media. secular media. "We need alternative Whitewater. y
That is only a,partial list of griev- sources i ter ion
becapse we suspect the me- ' She said she's more likely to be- Fconnosteecr'tiowasas ~ to murdered because of his'
, ances expressed this weekend duiing dia is liberal-oriented," Perkins said lieve the Mind speakers and their ~,`~Jotin Ankei6er to~d liste `
~iliatal:<b an~ing., how;
the Steeling the Mind of America con- in an interview yesterday. ~
ference °
. ~ newsletters than the secular media, pr9ve ttiat "Jesus`'exis£ed an .th t;
Participants at the meeting but can't prove either is ri ht.
Depending on the speaker, they al- agreed. , g • the Bible is true. His book table-was:
I so:worry about the Federal Reserve " ' ' , "The only things I'm sure of are -loaded with how to debunk almost.ev-:'
system; cults, holistic medicine, non- ting h straight dope from mainline the I:o d I sg comi gl bla~kt~ Harpea 'lims~Jews, holistic medicine 'astrolo _i
j Christians, apd evolution=and sex edu- media,".said Mike 1VIcHugh, a truck . said..::: . ' y g- cults, the Mormons, Mus-,'
~ cation:in schoois,_ ,
: J~~ ' driyer who would say only that he's She fumly believes, however, that _ Witnessest1Freethe mason ult, Jehowa~'s~
Nearly'1,500 people aTe'attendin from Colorado. "The bulk of the me-
! the• conference, which ends today. I h~ dia lies to us daily." "constitutional rights are being taken tiori; witches, rock music'a d CYqris-i
is one of six this year. This is the away because abortion and ho m o s e x- st i a n e v a n g e l i s t s w h o c an' t be trus te d.~,.
t i r d:annua l conference;.in Vail, but tha be, r esaid nK thi tSam yle hof I.ittle-, uality are allowed. '
" The Chattanooga, Tenn., television''
P Chuck Missler, also of Coeur. ~ talk-show host has written 39 b6oks;
this year the Mind conferences have ton. "The government makes sure we d'Alene, opened yesterday's sessions'and is heard in 50 markets acros5`the
expanded to Philadelphia; Coeur hear only what they want us to hear with a biting indictment of the Feder- country.
and-=Jerusalem. 4
d'Alene; Idaho; Los Angeles; Nassau; : about things like the United Nations al Reserve system which he termed Charles Huyck of Salt Lake : ; ~
want to help people steel their anMost ~f t ose ~interviewed'don't a„charade." . , , • 'Gityl ;
minds on how to operate in a world' like Bi11 Clinton's views on an thin . said there is "a lot of gloom: and;
It s designed to subjugate the ' doom here, but there is a spiritual~
Y g, American democratic system," he battle going on.
that is moving away from Christian including abortion, homosexuality said, and it controls the money sup- "Satan is winning now, but in`-`the,'.'
domination," said Bill Perkins of and the federal Department of Edu- ply, businesses, the credit system and : end, Jesus Christ will save''the'
Coeur d'Alene, who started the con- cation.
state ferences. Regina Harper of Pueblo believes ated toeg ve privateiwealth to the im-., . cknowl dged he o~rks for the feaery;'
Perkins wanted conservative the media has covered up the truth perial elite. It creates money out of., al government. '
. - ~
- ; ,
r ,
SALES TAX RECEIPTS
LAST UPDATE 29-Aug-95
VAIL % ASPEN % STEAMBOAT % BRECKEN- % FRISCO % AVON % CRESTED % MT CRESTED 3; DItLON %
SPRINGS RIDGE BUTTE BUTTE
SELF INC. SELF INC. SELF INC, SELF WC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC.
(4%) ..(I.7%) ---(4 .5%) (4 - 12%1 (a%) (4%) (4°i) (ay,)
JANUARY 1990 1,599,123 9.1 369,028 122 894,101 13.8 726,467 18.8 108,761 185,586 9.5
FEBRUARY 1990 73,895 17.5 164,401 142 36,111 46.9
1,695,850 8.6 37A,189 7.6 960,017 11.6 758,430 2.4 118,844 187,147 10.3 81,702 18.3 192,340 232
MARCH 1990 1,897,718 -22 433,791 (6.9) 1,127,570 6,0 916,270 2.3 40,055 21.9 APRIL 1990 151,328 226,931 4.0 103,860 -02 226,760 15.8 53,405 2.3 MAY 1990 634,174 11.1 142,333 10.3 359,116 242 322,455 19:1 81,745 120,697 15.1 27,399 40.3 23,958 0.7 18290 35.5 JUNE 1990 236,359 9.6 100,353 7.0 256,613 29.6 142,887 15.8 66,480 106,472 18.3 30,243 46.5 8,695 16.1 1104 13.8
448,227 13.9 185,965 4.1 372,629 26.9 230,726 20.8 88,376 135,500 23.8 51,993 12.1 17,513 •10.8 18,770 38.3
JULY1990 665,094 2.5 339809 43J 434,693 20.7 299,994 7.2 102,631 154,707 17.3 87,445 132 41,416 -102 17,834• 0.2
AUGUST 1990 618,071 1.5 339!592 432 454,176 18.7 298,424 -6.0 106,306 160,052 222 90,188 32.4 43,814 113 19,874 ' 17.4
SEPTEMBER 1990 482,328 2.8 237,034 41.6 425,205 21,3 237,320 8.0 101,733 132,183 17.5 66,986 -7.5 18278 -19,5 21,912 26.7
OCTOBER 1990 364,002 8.4 147,885 202 327,755 28.8 168,216 15.5 76,069
NOVEMBER 1990 128,420 18.1 36,958 33.8 13,432 10.1 12,450 24]
438,731 1.8 176,752 312 314,767 24.3 206,403 1.8 88,070 135,642 12.3 38,503 15.4 26,683 -8.1 16,853 31.0
DECEMBER 1990 1,625.219 0.6 548 - ,892 • 31.1 913,741 5,9 694,800 3.4 161,642 265,113 4.6 90,753 •0.5 131,041 -18.0 39,766 •3.8
-
- 10,764,896 4.4 3,399,623 18.6 6,840,383 14,9 5,002,392 7.1 1,251,985 1,938,050 12,7 779,925 12.6 908,331 6.1 306,804 16.7
JANUARY1991 1,713,091 7.1% 483,390 31.0% 1,001,837 12.0q 767,079 8.3% 107,359 -1.3% 201,236 8.4% 81,207 9.9% 155,333 -5.5% 36,189 Q.235
FEBRUARY 1991
MARCH 1991 1,737,343 2.4% 493,184 30.4% 1,083,273 12.8% 877,121 157q 141,980 19.5% 201,792 7.8% 82,503 1.0% 171,823 •10.7% 41,513 3.6% APRIL 1991 . 2,051,820 8.1% 584,887 34.8% 1,156,455 2.6% 988,910 7.9% 146,028 -3.5% 242,360 6.8% 93,173-10.3% 186,485-17.8% 52,812 -1.1% MAY 1991 616,648 -2.8% 185,295 302% 339,205 -5.5% 303,228 -6.0% 72,907 -10.8% 124,670 3.3/ 32,191 17.5% 26,950 12.5% 19,661 7.5% JUNE 1991 250,809 6.1% 132,558 32.1% 274,190 6.8% 139,485 -2.4% 58,992 -11.3% 116,162 9.5% 33,299 10.1% 9,167 5.4% 13,403 16.7% JULY 1991 468,948 4.6% 246,454 32.5% 386,262 3.7% 252,388 9.4% 110,996 25.6% 147,072 8.5/ 59,760 14.9% 16,436 -6.1% 18,038 -3.9%
AUGUST 1991 737,288 10.9% 349,450 2.8% 492,413 13.3% 338,285 12.8% 110,846 8.0% 185,900 20.2% 105,069 202% 53,521 292% 21,747 21.9%
761,992 12.4% 377,546 112% 511,742 12.7% 335,982 12.6% 125,197 17.8% 175,535 97% 96,028 6.5% 43,405 -0.9% 22,280 12.1 %
SEPTEMBER 1991 491,684 1.9% 244,967 3.3% 453,530 6.7% 267,705 12.8% 86,719 •14.8% 148,925 127'Y
OCTOBER1 71,258 6.4% 22,454 22.8% 19,095 •12.9%
991 324,802 -10.8% 179,500 21.4 % 339,388 3.5% 201,547 19.8% 85,421 12.3% 138,965 82% 43,284 17.1 ! 11;087 •11.5% 16,455 32.2%
NOVEMBER 1991 428,086 -2.4% 185,968 5.2% 327,600 4.1% 251,435 21.8% 90,527 2.8% 151,448 11.7% 45,685 18.7% 40,012 50.0% 15,412 •8.6%
DECEMBER 1991 1:&91,775 4.1% 577,419 52% 892,011 -2.4% 688,577 -0.9% 155,351 -3.9% 293,103 10.6% 111,192 22.5% 173,275 32.2% 37,183 -6.5%
-
..---11,274,286 47% 4,040,618 18.9% 7257,906 6.1% 5,432,342 8.6% 1,292,323 32% 2, - 127, - 1 - 88 -
- 9.8% 854,649 9.6% 909,948 . 0.2%
31 • 3 - ,788 - 2.3%
JANUARY 1992 1,709,654 -02% 504,822 4.4! 980,739 -2.1% 768,183 -2.4% 125,541 16.9% , 232,362 15.5% 97,994 20.7% 187,560 20.7% 35,537 -1.8%
FEBRUARY 1992 1,780,568 2.5% 501,254 1.6% 1,027,777 -5.1% 817,367 -6.9% 137,669 -3.0% 228,809 13.4% 97,512 182% 191,505 11.5% 42,977 3.5%
MARCH 1992 1,977,995 3.6q 597,681 2.2/ 1,247,216 7.8% 1,081,300 9.3% 168,099 15.1% 272,750 12.5% 131,046 40.6% 228,030 22.3% 54,540 3.3%
APRIL 1992 691,163 12.1% 211,310 14.0% 377,799 11.4% 359,175 18.5% 99,715 36.8% 164,407 31.9% 39,454 22.6% 31,529 17.0% 21,744 10.6%
MAY 1992 268,000 6.9% 168,773 273% 303,162 10.6% 164,922 18.29% 77,713 317% 137,682 18.5% 33,091 -0.6% 7,619 -16.9% 12,590 -6.1 %
JUNE 1992 468,598 -0.1% 278,878 132% 455,632 18.0% 275,311 9.1 % 105233 -52% 178,937 21.7% 69,376 16.1% 22,342 35.9% 19,210 6.5%
JULY 1992 742,750 0.7% 376,727 7.8% 554,641 12.6% 391,311 15.7% 115,978 4.6% 204,076 9.8% 124,687 18J% 48,922 •8.6% 22,839 5.0%
AUGUST 1992 767257 0.7% 426,955 13.1 % 559,271 9.3% 403,871 2029% 128,671 2.8% 201,747 14.9% 111,227 15.8% 49,353 13.7% 22,121 •0.7%
SEPTEMBER 1992 485,954 •12% 296205 20.9% 553,798 22.1% 311,450 16.3% 105,021 21.1% 173,095 162% 89,715 25.9% 30,780 37.1% 20,518 7.5%
OCTOBER 1992 367,578 132% 197,161 9.8% 414,077 22.0% 200,221 -0.7% 90,994 6.5% 172,972 24.5% 48,575 122% 17,542 5821% 14,957 -9.1%
NOVEMBER 1992 497,907 16.3% 210,307 13.1 % 388,945 18.7% 262,813 4.5% 102,565 13.3% 181,882 20.1% 48,689 6.6% 59,064 41.6% 20,518 33.1%
OECEMBER1992 ------•1,846,223 9.1% 656,042 - 13.6% 1 - ,041,437 16.8% 798,341 15.9% 162,251 4.4% 347,427 18.5% 144,802 30.2% 220,915 27.5% 46,544 252W
-
11,603,647 2.9% 4,426,115 9.5% 7,904,494 8.9% 5,834,325 7.4% 1,419,451 9.8% 2,496,146 17.3% 1,036,174 212% 1,095,161 20.4% 334,095 6.5% ~
- - - - -
'
<
SALES TAX RECEIPTS
LAST UPDqTE 29-Aug-95
TELLURIDE % SILVERTHORNE % SNOWMASS % EAGLE COUNTY % MINTURN % DURANGO % ESTES PARK % GLENWOOD % BEAVER CREEK %
SPRINGS RESORT CO
I STATE INC, STATE INC. SEIF INC. STATE INC. STATE INC. . SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. SELF INC.
(4q) (4%) (1 (I q) (4%) (2%) (4%) (3.00%) (5%)
JANUARY1993 220,048 11.6% 327,588 5.0% 155,432 2.1% 659,952 102% 33,564 10.3% 292,159 9.8% 145,635 3.1% 376,13919.4% 696,612 16.5%
FEBRUARY 1993 233,116 19.1% 342,418 2.6% 184,882 15.0% 656,584 57% 34,853 17.9% 269,822 2.0% 143,084 -2.1% 364,769 16.8% 755,661 15.8%
MARCH 1993 315,936 15.3% 447,696 2.1 % 198,734 8.6% 785,359 5.9% 41,725 -3.6q 358,813 -02°/ 195,477 82% 459,989 23.5% 911,750 9.6%
APRIL 1993 94,692 26.1% 290,308 7.3% 52,604 13.0% 349,410 18.3% 25,310 27.0% 302,338 5.9% 169,924 -0.1% 432,802 22.4% 269,744 67.9%
MAY 1993 71,968 -02% 252,454 -02% 11,411 -0.9% 190,942 -23.9% 13,721 2.4% 369,631 6.0% 270,722 4.6 % 469,413 17.9% 45,291 6.9 %
JUNE1993 187,364 -1.0% 334,102 -2.2% 31,877 -5.6% 327,390 22.8% 23,508 28.1% 489,800 7.8% 489,638 4.2% 538,492 232% 144,123 6.3%
JULY 1993 168,467 9.0% 30,804 3.3% 42,926 -5.4% 398,041 18.3% 22,955 -10.9% 522,548 7.6% 592,147 4.7% 564,235 25.0% 216,493 -0.5%
AUGUST1993 190,234 5.8% 450,524 d2% 72,149 377% 436,683 22.5% 29,060 6.9% 511,971 9.5% 575,406 -2.8% 552,149 17.8% 240,676 0.0%
SEPTEMBER 1993 185,132 3.2% 359,806 -0.4% 28,322 -6.5% 365,864 15.8% 29,691 17.5% 523,957 92% 576,538 8.6% 572,793 212% 160,840 1.9%
OCTOBER1993 91,301 62% 320,170 27.1% 11,623 4.1% 238,999 6.5% 20,542 267% 397,193 10.4% 273,750 13J% 525,808 232% 74,951 37.3%
NOVEMBER 1993 121,178 252% 300,406 6.1% 20,417 1.6% 301,865 14.5% 18,692 53% 342,738 212% 234,002 407% 494,920 23.9% 116,272 47.7%
DECEMBER 1993 .282,369 8,9% 480,557 2.3% 139,242 6.9% 772,160 11.1% 37,245 4.9°k 551,537 19.0% 218,508 -8.7% 652,014 20.4% 775,943 19.1%
2,161,805 9.5% 4,289,833 .2.0/ 949,685 82% 5,483,249 330,866 4,932,507 3,884,831 4.9% 6,003,523 21.3% 4,414,368 15.3%
o
>
JANUARY1994 218,816 -0.6% 377,276 15.2% 170,413 9.6% 689,137 4.4% 36,744 9.5% 327,036 11.9% 160,651 10.3% 421,973 12.2% 737,822 5.9%
FEBRUARY1994 276,850 18.8% 391,786 14.4% 185,587 0.4% 702,441 7.0% 34,371 -1.5% 304,884 13.0% 178,663 24.9% 412,770 13.2% 751,060 -0.6%
MARCH 1994 341,941 82% 571,893 277% 225,075 13.3% 866,967 10.4% 45,742 9.6% 412,973 15.1% 218,480 11.8% 531,905 15.6% 1,057,058 15.2%
APRIL 1994 134,558 42.1% 329,330 13.4% 46,790 -11.1 % 423,028 21.1% 22,830 •9.8% 345,826 14.4% 196,104 15.4% 471220 8.9% 249,086 -77%
MAY1994 91,277 26.8% 292,293 15.8% 8,127-29.2% 223,901 17.3% 17,185 252/ 402,803 9.0% 302,968 11.9% 508,722 8.4% 42,108 -7.0%
JUNE1994 193,009 3.0% 398,928 19.4% 34,530 8.3% 349,617 6.8% 22,879 -2J/ 566,796 15.7% 535,491 9.4% 615,667 14.3% 144,810 0.5%
JULY1994 190,169 12.9% 484,942 26.4% 58,525 36.3% 448,749 12.7% 29,281 27.6% 563,123 7.8% 629,833 6.4% 592,544 5.0% 259,942 20.1%
AUGUST 1994 217,890 14.5% 471,138 4.6% 55,371 -23.3% 492,869 12.9% 28,929 -0.5% 551,364 7.7% 629,507 9.4% 604,758 9.5% 298,394 24.0Y
SEPTEMBER 1994 202,844 9.6% 405,330 12.7% 27,566 -2.7% 446,549 22.1% 28,139 -52% 581,765 11.0% 691,588 20.0% 631,090 102% 190,259 18.3%
OCTOBER 1994 110,225 207% 348,825 8.9% 20,266 74.4% 309,112 29.3% 20,413 '-0.6% 431,993 8.8% 294,452 7.6% 555,267 5.6Y 74,614 -0.4%
NOVEMBER 1994 110,240 -9.0% 329,503 9.7% 23,597 15.6% 339,848 12.6% 15,423 -17.5% 360,405 52% 209,198 -10.6% 526,937 6.5% 119,437 2.7%
DECEMBER1994 _286,463 1.4'Y 574,102 19.5% 136,358 -2.1% 833,946 8.0% 41,324 11.0% 582,991 5.1% 275,294 26.0% 707,863 8.6% 850,448 9.6%
2,374,282 9.8% 4,975,346 16.0% 992,205 4.5% 6,126,164 11J% 343211 3.7% 5,431,959 10.1% 4,322229 11.3% 6,580,716 9.6% . 4,775,038 82% •
- - - -
JANUARY 1995 307,516 40.5% 388,808 3.1 % 169,332 •0.6% 739,397 7.3% 36,727 -0.0% 355,501 8.7% 151,629 -5.6% 858,844 16.4%
FEBRUARY 1995 332,898 20.2% 410,914 4.9% 188,814 1.7% 754,584 7.4% ~ 33,152 -3.4% 346,287 13.6q< 203,979 142% 813,260 8.3%
MARCH 1995 393,255 15.0% 516237 -9J% 211,813 -5.9% 903,019 42% 47,909 47% 450,725 9.1% 226,199 3.5% 1,038,808 •1.7%
APRIL1995 122,357 -9.1% 366,618 11.3% 45,740 -22% 428,484 1.3% 25,866 13.3% 368,238 6.5% 212,103 82% 263,854 5.9%
MAY 1995 109,460 19.9% 307,824 5.3% 12,911 58.9% 262,409 172% 16,698 -2.8% 426,317 5.8% 297,3.81 -1.8%
68,215 6Z.0%
JUNE 1995 391,786 -1.8% 31,W9 -10.0% 385,764 10.3% 25,615 12.0% 590,692 42% 542,292 1.33~ 163,846 13.1%
AUGUST JULY 1995 1995
250,846 -3.5%
SEPTEMBER 1995 .
OC70BER 1995
NOVEMBER 1995 .....k... .
DECEMBER 1995
1,265,486 d6.7% 2,382,187 -52.1% 659,689 •33.5/ 3,473,657 -03.3% 185,967 d5.8/ 2,537,760 -53.3q> 1,633,583 -622/ 0""'•"" 3,457,673 -27.61
o D ~
" July 1990 Aspen imposed an addltional .45% sales ta,x dedicated tor affordable employee housing
" 1/1/93 Glenwood Springs sales tax rale increased to 3.00%
NOV.'92-APRIL'93/NOV.'93•APRIL'94 12.8% 13.4% 6.1% 10.1% 3.6% 16.0% 13.8% 15.9% 9.4%
MAY'93-OCT.'93 ! MAY'94 - OCT.'94 12.4% 14.3% 3.0% 16.0% 5.3% 10.0% 11.0% 8.8% 14.5%
NOV.'93-APRIL'941NOV.'94-APRIL'95 12.9% 5.5% -1.5% 6.5% 2.5% 7.8% 6.0% •58.6q 7.0%
MAY'94-OCT.'94lMAY'95-0CT.'95 -89.1% -70.9% •78.5% •71.5% -71.2% -672% -72.8% -52.2%
SALES TAX RECEIPTS
LAST UPDATE 29•Aug•95
TELLURIDE % SILVERTHORNE % SNOWMASS % EAGLE COUNIY % MINTURN %DURANGO % ESTES PARK % GLENWOOD % BEAVER CREEK %
SPRINGS RESORT CO
STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. STATE INC: SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. SELF INC.
(4%) (4%) (1 (4q) (2%) (4%) (3.00%) (5g;)
JANUARY 1990 127,194 (9.7) 218,154 33.4 128,563 19.1 530,616 222 22,246 211,261 10.9 105,843 4.4 266,035 97 382,928 62.0
FEBRUARY 1990 134,724 (16.5) 239,012 28.0 158,097 39.8 549,853 16.1 24,650 199,581 72 101,731 1.7 269,437 12.0 462,466 54.0
MARCH 1990 150,032 (13.9) 296,142 9.7 183,804 57 675,367 5.8 37,241 299,074 122 152,776 72 373,654 14.1 581,887 36.0
APRIL 1990 61,514 522 173,038 3.3 28,841 (33.0) 241,646 20.1 15,420 229,390 14.0 136,169 13.9 303,960 9.0 83,177 20.0
MAY 1990 55,150 (3.9) • 163,520 27.4 9,886 79.1 185,322 37.9 9,497 211,620 10.8 211,884 -16.4 333,164 15.1 38,505 321.0
JUNE 1990 119,123 35.8 210,954 22 21,082 14.4 249,611 20.4 20,450 406,433 132 406,075 272 426,821 12,0 95,816 64.0
JULY 1990 108,137 0.0 253,528 152 37,135 (26.7) 284,135 10.1 19,566 371,381 9.3 487,255 82 394,580 11.6 135,179 64.0
AUGUST 1990 120,339 30.0 269,130 172 42,076 12.8 316,719 20.9 19,232 362,029 9.1 453,005 6.9 400,602 9.6 139,963 138.0
SEPTEMBER 1990 124,912 10.0 221,462 (4.2) 28,771 67.8 264,156 9.4 22,012 454,287 16.4 500,240 6.0 421,828 103 119,114 247.0
OCTOBER 1990 68,039 36.9 185,300 20.1 7,511 4.8 198,394 23.4 12,904 281,597 14.0 201,156 9.4 362,262 13.9 37,499 234.0
NOVEMBER 1990 69,366 (3.7) 221,172 13.8 11,900 (238) 199,855 20.7 13,999 240,653 6.4 145,616 10.2 335,541 8.3 57,635 76.0
DECEMBER 1990 156,168 (30.7) 331,436 27,0 98,734 (20.3) 574,106 -18.5 30,103 394,038 9.9 200,358 -2.5 471,725 1.3 459,086 18.0
•
1,294,698 -2.0 2,779,878 15.3 756,400 6.0 4,269,780 10.0 247,320 3,721,350 11.0 3,102,108 6.8 4,359,609 102 2,593,255
- . _
JANUARY 1991 170,037 33.7% 273,702 25.5% 139,704 87% 557,300 5.0% 29,819 340% 235268 11.4% 128,036 21.0% 296,231 11.4°!> 472,426 23.4%
FEBRUARY1991 168,934 25.4% 308,146 28.9% 155,434 -1.7% 572,313 4.1% 31,083 26.1% 225,908 112% 116,892 14.9% 285,097 S.8% 534,690 15.6%
MAFCH 1991 199,375 32.9% 445,966 50.6 % 162,027 -11.8% 718289 6.4 % 39,765 6.8% 325,723 8.9% 157,335 3.0% 370,952 -0.7 % 683,227 17.4 %
APRIL 1991 69,452 12.9% 219,124 26.6% 38,116 322% 243,048 0.6% 16,729 8.5% 244,960 6.8% 134,666 -1.1 % 316,761 42% 130,645 57.1 %
MAY1991 76,847 39.3% 204,702 252% 9,746 -1.4% 110,893 -7.8% 14,638 54.1% 303,403 11.7% 237,388 12.0% 345,715 3.8% 42,852 11.3%
JUNE 1991 146,444 22.9% 345,368 63.7% 22,059 4.6% 284,523 14.0% 18,381 :10.1 % 450,719 10.9% 430,401 6.0% 427,291 0.1% 122,735 28.1%
JULY1991 154,387 42.8% 367,912 45.1% 37,912 2.1% 325,662 14.6% 21,980 12.3% 426,098 14.7% 518,745 6.5% 398,205 0.9% 170,948 26.5%
AUGUST 1991 154,590 28.5% 393,662 47.9% 49,796 18.3% 335,927 6.1% 21,185 102% 432,332 19.4% 567,691 253'Y 418,206 4.4% 170,230 21.6%
SEPTEMBER 1991 132,791 6.3% 373,944 68.9% 23,349 -18.8% 293,847 11.2% 18,580 -15.6% 477,387 5.1% 481,236 -3.8% 445,232 5.5% 151,700 21.4%
OCTOBER 1991 74,272 92% 242,620 30.9% 11,029 46.8% 197,823 -0.3% 15,837 22.7% 321,323 14.1% 208,843 3.8% 368,825 1.8% 63230 68.6%
NOVEMBER 1991 79,876 152% 227,900 3.0% 15,797 327% 198,806 -0.5% 13,643 -2.5% 266,427 10.7% 164,821 132% 338,528 0.9% . 38,052 -34.0%
DECEMBER1991 191,440 22.6% 442,984 33.7% 112,512 14.0% 619,189 7.9% 31,998 6.3% 452,268 14.8% 208,905 4.3% 479,701 1.7% 561,326 22.3%
1,618,445 25.0% 3,846,030 38.4% 777,481 2.8% 4,517,620 5.8% 273,638 10.6% 4,161,816 11.8% 3,354,959 82% 4,490,744 3.0% 3,142,061 212%
- - - - -
JANUARY1992 197,167 16.0% 312,012 14.0% 152,259 9.0% 598,833 7.5% 30,424 2.0% 265,994 13.1% 141,270 10.3% 315,108 6.4°h 598,189 26.6%
FEBRUARY 1992 195,661 15.8% 333,758 8.3% 160,764 3.4% 621,265 8.6% 29,565 -4.9% 264,442 17.1 % 146;106 25.0% 312,289 9.5% 652,735 22.1 %
MARCH1992 273,926 37.4% 438,364 -17% 182,913 12.9% 741,508 32% 43,295 8.9% 359,409 10.3% 180,591 14.8% 312,547 0.4% 837,370 22.6%
APRIL 1992 75,073 8.1% 270,606 23.5% 46,564 222% 295,252 21.5% 19,935 192% 285,414 16.5% 170,178 26.4% 353,701 11.7'Y 160,674 23.0%.
MAY1992 75,150 -22% 253,008 23.6% 11,580 18.8% 251,059 46.9% 13,404 -8.4% 348,762 15.0% 258,861 9.0% 398,076 15.1% 42,392 •1J%
JUNE1992 189,295 29.3% 341,678 -1.1% 33,776 53.1% 266,640 -6.3% 18,350 -02% 454,460 0.8% 470,100 92% 437,015 2.3% 135,604 10.5%
JULY 1992 154,564 0.1% 418,348 13.7% 45,366 197% 336,427 3.3% 25,750 172% 485,467 13.9% 565,744 9.1 % 451,371 13.4% 217,565 27.3%
AUGUST 1992 179,144 16.3% 470,378 19.5% 52,414 5.3% 356,478 6.1% 27,180 28.3% 467,448 8.1% 591,899 4.3% 468,880 12.1% 240,617 41.3%
SEPTEMBER 1992 191,304 44.1% 361,300 •3.4% ` 30,303 29.8% 315,846 7.5% 25,261 36.0N 479,829 0.5% 530,881 10.3% 472,571 6.1% 157,872 4.1%
OCTOBER 1992 85,977 15.8% . 251,946 3.8% 11,161 12% 224,342 13.4% 16,211 2.4% 359,779 12.0% 240,795 15.3% 426,738 15.7% 54,584 •13.7%
NOVEMBER 1992 96,751 21.1% 283,184 24.3% 20,092 272% 263,731 32.7% 17,748 30.1% 282,739 6.1% 166,270 0.9% 399,494 18.0% 78,741
DECEMBER 1992 259,411 35.5'Y 469,654 6.0% 130,259 15.8% 695,308 12.3% 35,510 11.0% 463,462 2.5% 239,335 14.6% 541,478 12.9% 651,268 16.0%
1,974,023 22.0% 4,204,236 9.3% 877,451 4,966,689 9.9% 302,633 10.6% 4,517,205 8.5% 3,702,030 10.3% 4,949,268 102% 3,827,611 21.8%
AUG 29 '95 11:37AM
P.lii
.
. • FOR RVNEDIPiTE RE'i.EA5E ~
• • Media Contacts
' • ' Paul Witt (970) 845-5720
Rob Perlman (970) 845-5721
. • S.A~ UP TO 70% AT E 5IECOND A'NITAI, IVIQITPTLAIN AUDNFSS
1EW
. SALE
. , .
• VAIL, Colo, Augus4 29, 1995 -Bargain bunters looldng for some of the bese deals of
the year on a variety of new and used merctmdise ruill waait to mark their calendars for
. the Secoad Annuaf lihtountain 1Madness Tent Sa1e, Friday-Suriday, Sept. 14, from 10:40
a.m. to 9:00 p,m. ~~n municipal lot, located nexY eo the Turntable restaurant,
The Vaii Associates retail department will offer shoppers up to.70% o£f itezas £rom
manufacturers such as Rossignol, IVordica, Salomon, Helly lHCansen, A1evica, A,valanche,
VOl~ Burton and many more. Winter items being sa]d include skis, boots, biradings,.
poles, sunglasses, goggles, hats, snowboards, slawear and much more. Summer
merchandise includes mouata,ia bikes and accessones, in-line skates, shoes and appacel: in
~
addition to the great deats on summer atxd wizrter items, the tent sale also $a,y children's
merchandise and household accessory items.
' New this year, oae lucky person will be chosen from a drawing for a shopping spgee, The
. wirmer will have one minute to scout the rnerchandise and then 30 seconds to grab items.
T'o makke thzngs interesting the winncrwill have to wear snowshoes, mittens, a parka and
goggles vvhile maldng the mad dash for the goods. The drawing will be held Thursday
. night at 6:00 p.m, an,d the shopping sprec evi]1 lcick-off the tene sale on Friday at 10:00
a.m. To enter the drawing, sign up at any VA retail location including Avaal Adventure
Outfitters, Beawer Creek Sports, Edgewise and Singletrack Sports.
; :
j~As 'wi2h last year's sale, a pvrtion oFthe proceeds vvilI 8enefi4 a local organization. Thi8
year's beneficxary is the Mnturn Fire Department,
. ~ -30-
VMWCHWAOINC
sti a?whm-Aun
tAnreanin?t?
PO Box 7 9 Vail, Colorado 0 81658 a phone 303 645 5723 ° fax 303 645 5728
Town of Vail
Sales Tax Estimation Worksheet
8/31 /95
/ Change / Change
1995 from trom
PRonth 7964 15195 1986 1587 1588 1999 1990 1991 7992 1993 1934 Budget Esiimate Varfance 1994 Budget
~i~i;~~i;`>
. .
~ ;
2>4;..
""::^;::'Y:;;,'......;~:;:%.:~"~' ^.:;;.'.::i`% ;
~
_ . . . , ....'r..::::.,:.'~.:; .
, . . . :..;;~o.'
6:>:+ :i~i::. . ' .
"ii:i>:'%.'.':::i:::..:[:
. . . . . . 'o>..: ~ . . . . . . .
January 742,262 881:304 890,585 1,063,196 1,126;496 1;465,870 1,599,123 1;713;091 1;709;654 1,855;304 1,805,707 1,869;600 1,893;097 23;497 4.84% 1.26%
February 824,650 918;154 946,552 1,135;786 1,205,101 1;561,286 11695,850 11737,343 1,780,568 1,828,766 1,814,4951 1;883;100 1;814,419 (68;681) 0.00% -3.651/.
1
March 1;084;814 1187,520 1;316,652 11378,782 1,591;705 1,939;758 1,897,718 2;051;820 1,977,995 1,988,090 21250;656 1 2,326,900 2,137,610 (189;290) -5.02% -8.13%
April 481;204 531;665 430,877 425,961 550;205 567,684 634;174 616,648 691;163 8G4;303 794;668 820,500 789,288 (31,212) -0.68% -3.80%
May 166200 162;912 244,987 245;518 170;567 215,548 236;359 250,809 268;000 257,248 287,315 296,000 322;820 26,820 12.361/ 9.06°/
June 262;696 280;828 361;627 331,531 329;039 393,470 448.227 468;948 468;598 475,161 548;820 564,900 586;505 21;605 6.87 % 3.82°/
July 406;462 447,815 479,507 479,201 559,683 649,139 665;094 737,288 742,750 811,538 f392,830 928;700 876,000 (52,100) -1.89% -5.61 %
.
, ; .
:x.i
~ ~ .i:. .i ~ .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . :
. . . . . . . . .
TOTAL 3,968;288 4,410,201 4;670;787 5,060;025 5,532,796 6,792,755 7,176;545 7;575;947 71638;728 81080,470 8;394,491 I 8;689;100 8,419;739 -269,361 0.301/ -3.10%
. . . . .
.
. . .
.i '
August 402;792 386,985 512,513 536,904 575,887 668;119 678;071 761,992 767,257 825;954 891;566 928,100
September 384,864 340;102 374;060 442,402 422,502 469,032 482,323 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 753,200
October 206;248 209:282 237,504 273,951 291,204 335,740 364;002 324;802 367,578 400,525 408,405 417,000
November 310,588 229,083 376;657 386;270 376,235 430,820 438731 428,086 497,907 553;681 594;491 605;300
December 906;758 905;955 11167,280 1;245,612 1,455;948 11615;278 11625,219 1,691;775 1;846,223 1,974;553 1;992;855 2,057,702
> >s»s>:~»:<~:.»s>;s:::as> ~s>s»>s>:~>
;
. '
.
:
. . . . . ,
'i!::;':.';";, : . , ' ~
. : . . .
.
~ . .
Total 6,179,538 6,481;608 7,338,801 7;945;164 8,654,572 10;311,744 10,764;896 11,274;286 11;603;647 12,395,718 1310071013 13;450,402 8,419;739 ~
SALES TAX RECEIPTS •
LASTUPDATE 31-Aug-95
VAIL % ASPEN % STEAMBOAT / BRECKEN- / FRISCO % AVON / CRESTED % MTCRESTED / DILLON %
SPRINGS RIDGE BUTfE BUTTE
SELF INC. SELF ' INC. SELF INQ SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC.
(ay) ..(1.7%) . (4.5%) (a%) (2q) (a%) (4%) (4%) (4%)
JANUARY1993 1,855,364 8.5% 612,492 21.3% 1,059,677 8.0% 848,602 10.5% 145,276 15.7% 276,902 19.2% 96,459 •1.6% 191,847 2.3% 40,820 14.9%
FEBRUARY1993 1,828,766 2.7% 595,485 18.8/ 1,089,995 6.1% 908,305 11.1% 140,546 2.1/ 252,441 10.3/ 110,096 12.9% 202,607 5.8% 44,520 3.6%
MAflCH1993 1,988,090 0.5% 689,769 15.4% 1,304,499 4.6% 1,122,593 3.8% 186,521 11.0/ 310,910.14.0% 134,365 2.5% 222,566 •2.4% 59,595 9.3%
APRIL1993 864,303 25.1% 210,069 27.8% 440,315 16.5% 432,777 20.5q 108,701 9.0/ 185,925 13.1% 39,988 1.4% 44,224 40.3% 26,33721.1%
MAY1993 257,248 •4.0% 207,336 22.8Y 336,298 10.9% 178,430 8.2/ 86,544 11.4% 153,663 11.6/ 36,152 92/ 10,333 35.6% 14,207 12.8/
JUNE1993 475,161 1.4% 321,768 15.4% 505,790 11.0/ 277,762 0.9% 116,677 10.9/ 206,420 15.4/ 76,702 10.6% 20,635 -7.6% 22,603 17.7%
JULY1993 811,538 9.3% 461,587 22.5% 631,027 13.8Y 464,381 18.7% 140,811 21.4/ 244,697 19.9/ 123,293 4.1/ 55,968 14.4% 31,918 39.8%
AUGUST1993 825,954 7.7q 468,612 9.8% 648,090 15.9% 436,894 62% 148,164 15.1/ 229,405 137% 119,867 7.8% 50,535 2.4% 25,417 14.9%
SEPTEMBER 1993 560,535 15.3% 349,333 17.9% 627,873 13.4% 349,002 12.1% 138,613 32.0% 197,197 13.9/ 91,573 8.8% 30,262 •1.7Y 25,852 26.0/
OCTOBER 1993 400,525 9.0% 227,090 152/ 431,901 4.3% 248,171 23.9% 109,162 20.0% 194,654 12.5% 57,715 18.8/ 16,493 -6.0% 17,816 19.1 /
NOVEMBER 1993 553,681 11.2% 223,362 62% 443,324 14.0% 339,988 29.3% 134,525 312% 220,648 21.3% 72,427 48.6/ 76,278 29.1% 25,286 232/
DECEMBER 1993 1,974,553 7.0% 719,183 9.6/ 1,100,033 5.6% 884,934 10.8% 178,418 10.0% 358,978 3.3% 152,158 5.1% 229,865 4.1% 46,831 0.6%
12,395,718 6.8% 5,146,106 16.3% 8,618,822 9.0% 6,491,839 1,633,958 15.1% 2,831,846 13.4% 1,116,795 7.8% 1,151,613 5.2% 381,202
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JANUARY1994 1,805,707 -27% 640,713 4.6% 1,087,246 2.6% 916,224 6.0% 153,307 5.5% 278,391 0.5% 91,478 -52% 185,375 •3.4% 45,145 10.6%
FEBRUARV1994 1,814,495 -0.8% 635,652 6.7% 1,104,119 1.3/ 931,580 2.6% 153,158 9.0/ 263,028 4.2% 114,492 4.0% 220,042 8.6% 49,339 10.8%
MARCH 1994 2,250,656 13.2/ 738,349 7.0% 1,378,438 5.7/ 1,245,513 10.9/ 212,440 13.9%a 338,763 9.0/ 151,863 13.0% 269,698 212Y 78,380 31.5%
APRIL 1994 794,668 $.1 / 265,461 -1.7% 474,773 7.8% 514,225 18.8% 122,437 12.6% 204,538 10.0% 36,988 -7.5% 29,059 -34.3% 26,540 0.8%
PAAY1994 287,315 11.1% 211,479 2.0q 381,085 13.3% 223,275 25.1% 104,711 21.0% 185,122 20.5% 45,029 24.6% 12,317 19.2% 17,541 23.5%
JUNE1994 548,820 15.5% 337,606 4.9/ 545,361 7.8% 342,336 23.2% 137,653 16.0% 229,785 11.3/ 92,182 20.2% 22,539 9.2% 29,213 29.2%
JULY1994 892,830 10.0% 548,222 18,8/ 685,546 8.6% 509,336 9.7% 166,891 18.5% 273,543 11.8/ 162,956 32.2% 60,434 8.0% 34,006 6.5%
AUGUST1994 891,566 7.9% 512,317 9.3/ 702,321 8.4% 469,792 7.5% 151,931 6.6/ 264,961 15.5% 139,003 16.0% 52,928 4.7% 30,767 21.0%
SEPTEMBER1994 725,205 29.4% 351,921 0.7% 644,202 2.6% 359,496 3.0% 167,927 21.1% 241,489 22.5/ 109,288 12.0% 30,882 2.0Y 28,654 10.8Y
OCTOBER 1994 408,405 2.0% 213,533 -6.0% 451,845 4.6% 270,388 9.0% 127,498 16.8% 225,391 15.8/ 61,673 6.9/ 23,689 43.6% 19,432 9.1%
NOVEMBER 1994 594,491 7.4% 153,891 -31.1 % 448,761 1.2% 402,619 18.5% 136,193 1.2% 247,643 12.3% 67,971 -6.2Y 48,914 -35.9% 22,283 -11.9Y
DECEMBER 1994 1,992,855 0.9% 736,999 2.5% 1,171,042 6.5% 959,585 8.4% 222,389 24.6% 419,132 16.8/ 147,237 -3.2% 223,427 •2.8% 51,992 11.0%
- -
13,007,013 4.9% 5,346,149 3.9% 9,074,744 5.3% 1,144,571 10.1% 1,862,535 14.0% 3,171,986 12.0% 1,220,160 9.3% 1,179,304 2.4% 433,292 13.7,/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JANUARY1995 1,893,097 4.8% 646,515 0.9% 1,098,162 1.0/ 936,978 2.3% 139,670 -8.9% 312,731 12.3% 99,226 8.5% 187,145 1.0% 48,595 7,6/
FEBRUARY1995 1,814,419 -0.0% 639,840 0.7% 1,169,109 5.9% 986,519 5.9/ 187,202 22.2% 296,623 12.8% 131,004 14.4% 206,851 -6.0% 49,181 -0.3/
MARCH1995 2,137,610 -5.0% 747,349 1.2% 1,368,734 -0J% 1,130,691 -9.2% 217,964 2.6/ 372,790 10.0% 156,793 32% 279,610 3.7% 64,267-18.0Y
APRIL1995 789,288 -0.7% 294,844 11.1/ 459,748 -3.2/ 549,690 6.9% 127,521 4.2% 226,013 10.5% 49,457 33.7% 44,110 51.8% 30,461 14.8%
MAY1995 322,820 12.4% 181,040•14.4% 375,651 -1.4% 253,042 13.3% 121,767 16.3% 199,975 8.0W 51,681 14.8% 14,273 15.9% 23,059 31.5%
JUNE 1995 586,505 6.9°Y 361,656 1.1Y 596,153 9.3% 143,733 4.4/ 264,004 14.9% 92,771 0.6% 35,711 58.4% 26,473 •9.4%
JULV 1995 876,000 -1.9%
AUGUST 1995
SEPTEMBER 1995
OCTOBER 1995
NOVEMBER 1995
DECEMBER 1995 ' .
8,419,739 -35.3% 2,871,244 -46.3/ 5,067,557 -44.2% 3,856,920 -46.0/ 937,857 -49,6/ 1,672,136 -47.3% 580,932 -52.4% 767,706 •34.9% 242,036 -44.1 /
- - - - - - - - - - -
"July 1990 Aspen imposed an additionel .45% sales taz rJedicated ior eflordable employee housing
" 111l93 Glenwood Spnngs sales tax rate increesed to 3.01%
" 111l95 Telluride seles tan rate increased to 4.5%
NOV.'92-APRIL'93 / NOV. '93-APRIL'94 3.5% 62% 4.9% 10.5% 12.8Y 7.0% 7.8/ 7.3% 13.9%
MAY'93-OCT.'93/MAY'94•OCT.'94 12J%a 6.8% 7.20/o 11.3% 16.661. 15.8/ 19.3% 10.1% 15.8/
NOV.'93-APRIL'94MOV.'94-APRIL'95 0.3% -0.1/ 2.3% 2.8% 8.0% 12.7% 5.2% -2.0% •1.7/
MAY'94-OCT.'94/AqAY'95-OCT.'95 -52.4% -75.0'Y -71.5% •88.4/ •692% -67.3% -76.3/ -75.4% -69.0%
.
SALESTAX RECEIPTS
LASTUPDATE 31-Aug-95
4AIL % ASPEN % STEAMBOAT / BRECKEN- / FRISCO / AVON % CRESTED % MTCRESTED % DILLON /
SPRINGS RIDGE BUTTE BUTTE
SELF INC. SELF INC. SELF INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC.
(4%) ..(1.7v) (a.si) (ai) (2i) (ai) (ai) (a%) (a%)
JANUARY 1990 1,599,123 9.1 369,028 122 894,101 13.8 726,467 18.8 10B,761 185,586 9.5 73,895 17.5 164,401 14.2 36,111 46.9
FEBRUARY1990 1,695,850 8.6 378,189 7.6 960,017 11.6 758,430 2.4 118,844 187,147 10.3 81,702 18.3 192,340 23,2 40,055 21.9
MARCH 1990 1,891,718 -2.2 433,791 (6.9) 1,127,570 6.0 916,270 2.3 151,328 226,831 4.0 103,860 -0.2 226,760 15.8 53,405 2.3 APRIL 1990 634,174 11.7 142,333 10.3 359,116 242 322,455 19.7 81,745 120,697 15.1 27,399 40.3 23,958 0.7 18,290 35.5
MAY 1990 236,359 9.6 100,353 7.0 256,613 29.6 142,887 15.8 66,480 106,072 183 30,243 46.5 8,695 16.1 11,484 13.8
JUNE 1990 448,227 13.9 185,965 4.1 372,629 26.9 230,726 20.8 88,376 135,500 23.8 51,993 12.1 11,513 -10.8 18,770 36.3
JULY 1990 665,094 2.5 339,809 43.1 434,693 20.7 299,994 72 102,631 154,707 17.3 87,445 13.2 41,416 -10.2 17,834 0.2
AUGUST 1990 678,071 1.5 339,592 43.2 454,176 18.7 298,424 -6.0 106,306 160,052 22.2 90,188 32.4 43,814 11.3 19,874 17.4
SEPTEMBER 1990 482,328 2.8 237,034 41.6 425,205 21.3 237,320 8.0 101,733 132,183 17.5 66,986 •7.5 18,278 -19,5 21,912 26.7
OCTOBER 1990 364,002 8.4 147,885 202 327,755 28.8 168,216 15.5 76,069 128,420 18.1 36,958 33.8 13,432 10.1 12,450 24.7
NOVEMBER 1990 436,131 1.8 176,752 312 314,767 24.3 206,403 1.8 88,070 135,642 12.3 38,503 15.4 26,683 -8J 16,853 31.0
DECEMBER 1990 1,625,219 0.6 548,892 31.1 913,741 5.9 694,800 3.4 161,642 265,113 4.6 90,753 -0.5 131,041 -18.0 39,766 •3.8
10,764,896 4.4 3,399,623 18.6 6,840,383 14.9 5,002,392 7.1 1,251,985 1,938,050 12.7 779,925 12.6 908,331 6.1 306,804 16.7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JANUARY1991 1,713,091 7.1/ 483,390 31.0% 1,001,837 12.0Y 187,079 8.3% 107,359 -1.3% 201,236 8.4% 81,207 9.9/ 155,333 •5.5% 36,189 0.2%
FEBRUARY1991 1,737,343 2.4% 493,184 30.4% 1,083,273 12.8% 877,721 15.7% 141,980 19.5% 201J92 7.8/ 62,503 1.0% 171,823•10.7% 41,513 3.6%
MARCH 1991 2,051,820 8.1 % 584,887 34.8% 1,156,455 2.6% 988,910 7.9% 146,028 -3.5W 242,360 6.8% 93,173 -10.3% 186,485 -17.8% 52,812 •1.1 %
APRIL 1991 616,648 •2.8% 185,295 302% 339,205 -5.5% 303,228 -6.0% 72,907 -10.8% 124,670 3.3'Y 32,191 17,5% 26,950 12.5% 19,661 7.5%
MAY1991 250,809 6.1% 132,558 32.1% 274,190 6.8% 139,485 -2.4% 58,992-11.3% 116,182 9.5% 33,299 10.1% 9,167 5.4% 13,403 16J%
JUNE 1991 468,948 4,6% 246,454 32.5% 386,262 3.7% 252,368 9.4% 110,996 25.6% 147,072 8.5% 59,760 14.9% 16,436 -6.1% 18,036 -3.9%
JULY1991 737,286 10.9% 349,450 2.8% 492,413 13.3% 338,285 12.8% 110,846 8.0% 185,900 20.2% 105,069 20.2% 53,521 29.2% 21,747 21.9%
AUGUST1991 761,992 12.4% 377,546 11.2% 511,742 12.7% 335,982 12.6% 125,197 17.8Y 175,535 97% 96,028 6.5% 43,405 •0.9% 22,280 12.1%
SEPTEMBER 1991 491,684 1.9% 244,967 3.3/ 453,530 6.7% 267,705 12.8% 86,719 -14.8% 148,925 12.7'Y 71,258 6.4% 22,454 22.8% 19,095 -12.9%
OCTOBER 1991 324,802 -10.8% 179,500 21.4% 339,388 3.5% 201,547 19.6% 85,421 12.3/ 138,965 82% 43,284 17.1 / 11,087 -11.5/ 16,455 322%
NOVEMBER 1991 428,086 •2.4q 185,968 5.2% 327,600 4.1% 251,435 21.8% 90,527 2.8% 151,448 11.7% 45,685 18.7% 40,012 50.0% 15,412 -8.6%
DECEMBER1991 1,691,775 4.1/ 577,419 5.2% 892,011 -2.4/ 688,577 •0.9% 155,351 -3.9% 293,103 10.6% 111,192 22,5/ 173,275 32.2% 31,183 -6.5%
11,274,286 4.7% 4,040,618 18.9/ 7,257,906 6.11% 5,432,342 8.6/ 1,292,323 32% 2,127,188 9.8% 854,649 9.6% 909,948 0.2% 313,788 2.3%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JANUARV1992 1,709,654 -0.2% 504,622 4.4% 980,739 -2.1% 168,183 -2.4% 125,541 16.9% 232,362 15.5% 97,994 20J% 181,560 20.7% 35,537 -1.8%
FEBRUARY1992 1,780,568 2.5% 501,254 1.6% 1,027,777 -5.1% 817,367 -6.9% 137,669 -3.0% 228,809 13.4/ 97,512 182/ 191,505 11.5% 42,977 3.5%
MARCH 1992 1,977,995 -3.6% 597,681 22% 1,247,216 7.8/ 1,081,300 9.3% 168,099 15.1 % 272,750 12.5% 131,046 40.6% 228,030 22.3% 54,540 3.3%
APRIL 1992 691,163 12.1% 211,310 14.0% 377,799 11.4% 359,175 18.5% 99,715 36.8% 164,401 31.9% 39,454 22.6% 31,529 17.0W 21,744 10.6%
MAY1992 268,000 6.9% 168,773 21.3% 303,162 10.6% 164,922 182% 77,713 31.7/ 137,682 18.5% 33,097 -0.6Y 7,619-16.9% 12,590 -6.1%
JUNE1992 468,596 -0.1% 278,878 13.29% 455,632 18.0% 275,311 9.1/ 105,233 •52% 178,937 21.7% 69,376 16.1% 22,342 35.9/ 19,210 6.5Y
JULY1992 742,750 07% 376,127 7.8% 554,641 12.6% 391,311 157% 115,979 4.6% 204,076 9.8% 124,687 187% 48,922 -8.6% 22,839 5.0%
AUGUST 1992 767,257 0.7% 426,955 13.1 % 559,271 9.3% 403,871 20.21/o 128,671 2.8% 201,747 14.9% 111,221 15.8'Y 49,353 13.7% 22,121 -0.7%
SEPTEMBER1992 485,954 •12% 296,205 20.9% 553,198 22.1% 311,450 16.3% 105,021 21.1% 173,095 16.2% 89,715 25.9% 30,780 37.1% 20,518 7.5Y
OCTOBER 1992 367,578 13.2% 197,161 9.6% 414,077 22.0Y 200,221 -0.7% 90,994 6.5% 172,972 24.5% 48,515 12.2% 17,542 58.2% 14,957 •9.1%
NOVEMBER 1992 497,907 16.3% ' 210,307 13.1 % 388,945 18.7% 262,873 4.5% 102,565 13.3% 161,882 20.1% 48,689 6.6% 59,064 47.6% 20,518 33.1%
DECEMBER 1992 1,846,223 9.1 % 656,042 13.6% 1,041,437 16.8% 798,341 15.9% 162,251 4.4% 347,427 18.5% 144,802 30.2% 220,915 27.5% 46,544 25.2%
11,603,647 2.9'Y 4,426,115 9.5% 7,904,494 8.9% 5,834,325 1.4% 1,419,451 9.8% 2,496,146 17.3% 1,036,174 21.2% 1,095;161 20.4% 334,095 6.5%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~
a=~'o
SALES TAX RECEIPTS
LASTUPDATE 31-Aug-95
TELLURIDE % SILVERTHORNE / SNOWMASS / EAGLE COUNTY W MINTURN / DURANGO % ESTES PARK % GLENWOOD ! BEAVER CREEK %
SPRINGS RESORTCO
STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. SELF INC.
(4%) (4i) ll %l II il 14i1 Ipi) (av) (s.ooi) (si)
JANUARY 1993 220,048 11.6% 327,588 5.0% 155,432 2.1 % 659,952 102% 33,564 10.3% 292,159 9.8/ 145,635 3.1% 376,139 19.4% 696,612 16.5%
FEBRUARY1993 233,116 19.1% 342,418 2.6% 184,882 15.0% 656,584 57% 34,853 17.9% 269,822 2.0% 143,084 -2.1% 364,769 16.6% 155,667 15.8/
MARCH1993 315,936 15.3% 447,696 2.1% 198,134 8.6% 185,359 5.9% 41,725 -3.6Y 358,813 -0.2% 195,411 8.2% 459,989 23.5% 917,150 9.6%
APRIL1993 94,692 26.1% 290,308 7.3/ 52,604 13.0/ 349,410 18.3% 25,310 27.0% 302,338 5.9% 169,924 -0.1% 432,802 22.4% 269,744 67.9/
MAY1993 71,968 -0.2/ 252,454 •0.2% 11,477 -0.9% 190,942-23.9% 13,721 2.4% 369,631 6.0/ 210,722 4.6% 469,413 17.9% 45,297 6.9/
JUNE 1993 187,364 -1.0% 334,102 -22/ 31,877 -5.6% 327,390 22.8% 23,508 28.1% 489,800 7.8/ 489,638 42% 538,492 23.2/ 144,123 6.3/
JULY1993 168,467 9.0% 383,804 -8.3% 42,926 •5.4% 398,041 18.3% 22,955-10.9% 522,548 7.6% 592,147 4.7% 564,235 25.0% 216,493 -0.5%
AUGUST1993 190,234 5.8k 450,524 •42% 72,149 37.7% 436,683 22.5% 29,060 6.9% 511,971 9.5% 575,406 -2.8% 552,300 17.8% 240,676 0.0%
SEPTEMBER1993 185,132 -32% 359,806 •0.4Y 28,322 -6.5% 365,864 15.8q 29,691 17.5% 523,957 9.2'Y 516,538 8.6/ 512,918 21.2% 160,840 1.9/
OCTOBER1993 91,301 62% 320J70 27.1% 11,623 4.1/ 238,999 6.5% 20,542 26.7% 397,193 10.4% 273,750 13.7% 525,916 232% 74,951 31.3/
NOVEMBER 1993 121,178 25.2% 300,406 6.1% 20,417 1.6% 301,865 14.5% 18,692 5.3% 342,738 21.2'Y 234,002 40.7/ 495,198 24.0% 116,272 47.1/
DECEMBER1993 282,369 8.9% 480,557 2.3% 139,242 6.9% 772,160 11.1% 37,245 4.9% 551,537 19.0Y 218,508 $.7% 660,328 21.9% 775,943 19.1/
2,161,805 9.5% 4,289,833 2.0% 949,685 8.2% 5,483,249 330,866 4,932,507 3,884,831 4.9% 6,012,499 21.5% 4,414,368 15.3%
- - - - - - - - - -
JANUARY1994 218,816 -0.6/ 377,276 15.2% 170,413 9.6% 689,137 4.4% 36,744 9.5/ . 327,036 11.9% 160,651 10.3% 421,973 12.2% 737,622 5.9/
FEBRUARY1994 276,850 18.6% 391,786 14.4% 185,587 0.4%• 702,441 1.0% 34,322 -1.5% 304,884 13.0% 178,663 24.9% 413,043 13.2% 751,060 -0.6%
MARCH1994 341,941 8.2% 571,893 27.7% 225,075 13.3% 866,967 10.4% 45,742 9.6% 412,973 15.1% 218,480 11.8% 532,058 15.7% 1,057,058 15.2%
APRIL1994 134,558 42.1% 329,330 13.4% 46,790-11.1% 423,028 21.1% 22,830 •9.8% 345,826 14.4% 196,104 15.4% 471,253 8.9% 249,086 -7.7/
MAV1994 91,277 26.8% 292,293 15.8% 8,127-29.2% 223,901 17.3% 17,185 252% 402,803 9.0% 302,968 11.9% 508,826 6.4% 42,108 -7.0%
JUNE1994 193,009 3.0% 398,928 19.4/ . 34,530 8.3/ 349,611 6.8% 22,879 -2J% 566,796 15.7% 535,491 9.4% 616,320 14.8/' 144,810 0.5%
JULY1994 190,169 12.9% 484,942 26.4% 58,525 36.3% 448,749 12.7% 29,281 27,6% 563,123 7.8% 629,633 6.4% 594,767 5.4% 259,942 20J%
AUGUST1994 217,890 14.5% 471,138 4.6% 55,371 -23.3/ 492,869 12.9% 28,929 -0.5% 551,364 7J/ 629,507 9.4% 609258 10.3/ 298,394 24.0%
SEPTEMBER1994 202,844 9.6% 405,330 12.7/ 27,566 -2.7/ 446,549 22.1/ 28,139 -5.2M 581,765 11.0/ 691,588 20.0% 631,090 10.2% 190,259 18.31
OCTOBER 1994 110,225 20.7% 348,825 8.9% 20,266 74.4% 309,112 29.3% 20,413 -0.6% 431,993 8.8% 294,452 7.6% 555,267 5.6% 74,614 -0.4%
NOVEMBER 1994 110,240 -9.0% 329,503 9.7% 23,597 15.6% 339,848 12.6% 15,423 -17.5% 360,405 5.2% 209,198 -10.6% 526,937 6.4% 119,437 2.7%
DECEMBER1994 286,463 1.4% 574,102 19.5% 136,358 -2.1/ 633,946 8.0% 41,324 11.0% 582,991 5.7% 275,294 26.0% 707,863 12% 850,448 9.6%
2,374,282 9.8°1, 4,975,346 16.0% 992,205 4.5% 6,126,164 11.7% 343,211 3.7% 5,431,959 10.1% 4,322,229 11.3% 6,590,655 9.6% 4,775,038 ,8.2%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JANUARY1995 307,516 40.5'Y 388,808 3.1% 169,332 -0.6% 739,397 7.3% 36,727 -0.0Y 355,501 87% 151,629 -5.6% 449,412 6.5% 858,844 16.4%
FEBRUARY1995 332,896 20,2% 410,914 4,9/ 188,814 1.7/ 754,584 7.4% 33,152 •3.4% 346,287 13.6% 203,919 14.2% 447,342 8.3% 813,260 8.3%
MARCH1995 393,255 15.0% 516,237 -9.7% 211,813 -5.9/ 903,019 4.2% 47,909 4.7% 450,725 9.1% 226,199 3.5% 573,460 7.8% 1,038,808 -1.7%
APRIL1995 122,357 •9.1% 366,618 11.3% 45,740 •22% 428,484 1.3/ 25,866 13.3% 368,238 6.5% 212,103 8.2% 480,261 1.9% 263,854 5.9%
MAY1995 109,460 19.9% 307,824 5.3% 12,911 58.9% 262,409 17.2% 16,698 -2.8% 426,317 5.8% 297,381 -1.8/ 516,631 1.5% 68,215 62.0%
JUNE1995 391,786 -1.8% 31,079•10.0% 385,764 10.3% 25,615 12.0'Y 590,692 42% 542,292 1.3% 649,148 5.0% 163,846 13.1%
JULY1995 262,340 0.9%
AUGUST 1995
SEPTEMBER 1995
OCTOBER 1995
NOVEMBER 1995
DECEMBER 1995
-
1,265,486 -46.7% 2,382,187 -52.1 % 659,689 -33.5% 3,473,657 -43.3% 185,967 -45.8/ 2,537,760 -53.3% 1,633,583 -622% 3,116,314 -52.7% 3,469,167 -27.3%
"July 1990 Aspen imposed an additional .45% sales tex dedicated ior aflordable employee housing
" 111l93 Glenwood Springs sales tax rate increased to 390%
NOV.'92-APRIL'93lNOV.'93-APRIL'94 12.0Y 13.4% 6.1% 10.1% 3.6% 16.0/ 13.8% 16.3% 9.4%
MAY'93-OCT.'93 / MAY'94 - OCT.'94 12.4% 14.3% 3.0% 16.0% 5.3%. 10.0% 11.0% 9.1% 14.5%
NOV.'93-APRIL94MOV.'94-APRIL'95 12.9% 5.5/ -1.5% 6.5% 2.5% 7.8/ 6.0% 6.4% 7.0%
MAY'94-OCT.'941MAY'950CT.'95 -89.1 % •70.9% -78.5% -71.5% -71.2/ -672% -72.8% •66.9% •51.1 %
Ia Y
SALES TAX RECEIPTS
LASTUPDATE 31-Aug-95
TELIURIDE / SILVERTHORNE % SNOWMASS / EAGLE COUNTY / MINTURN / DURANGO / ESTES PARK / GLENWOOD % BEAVER CREEK %
SPRINGS RESORTCO
STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. SELF INC.
••(4.5%) (49%) (i%) (i%) (4%) (2%) (4M) (3.00%) (5%)
JANUARY 1990 127,194 (9.7) 218,154 33.4 128,563 19.1 530,616 222 22,246 211,261 10.9 105,843 4.4 266,035 9.7 382,928 62.0
FEBRUARY 1990 134,724 (16.5) 239,012 28.0 158,097 39.8 549,853 16.1 24,650 199,587 12 101,731 1.7 269,437 12.0 462,466 54.0
MARCH 1990 150,032 (13.9) 296,142 9.7 183,804 5.7 675,361 5.8 37,241 299,074 122 152,776 7.2 373,654 14.1 581,887 36.0
APRIL 1990 61,514 52.2 173,038 3.3 28,841 (33.0) 241,646 20.1 15,420 229,390 14.0 136,169 13.9 303,960 9.0 83,177 20.0
MAY 1990 55,150 (3.9) 163,520 27.4 9,886 79.1 185,322 37.9 9,497 211,620 10.8 211,884 •16.4 333,164 15.1 38,505 321.0
JUNE 1990 119,123 35.8 210,984 22 21,082 14.4 249,611 20.4 20,450 406,433 13.2 406,075 27.2 426,861 12.0 95,816 64.0
JULY 1990 108,137 0.0 253,528 15.2 37,135 (26.7) 284,135 10.1 19,566 371,381 9.3 487,255 8.2 394,580 11.6 135,179 64.0
AUGUST 1990 120,339 30.0 266,130 17.2 42,076 12.8 316,719 20.9 19,232 362,029 9.1 453,005 6.9 400,602 9.6 139,963 138.0
SEPTEMBER 1990 124,912 10.0 221,462 (4.2) 28,771 67.8 264,156 9.4 22,012 454,287 16.4 500,240 6.0 421,828 10.3 119,114 241.0
OCTOBER 1990 68,039 36.9 185,300 20.1 7,511 4.8 198,394 23.4 12,904 281,597 14.0 201,156 9.4 362,262 13.9 37,499 234.0
NOVEMBER 1990 69,366 (3.7) 221,172 13.8 11,900 (23.8) 199,855 20.7 13,999 240,653 6.4 145,616 10.2 335,541 8.3 57,635 76.0
DECEMBER 1990 156,168 (30.7) 331,436 27.0 98,734 (20.3) 574,106 -1E.5 30,103 394,038 9.9 200,358 -2.5 472,304 1.3 459,086 18.0
1,294,698 -2.0 2,779,818 15.3 756,400 6.0 4,269,780 10.0 247,320 3,721,350. 11.0 3,102,108 6.8 4,360,228 10.2 2,593,255
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JANUARY1991 170,037 33.7% 273,702 25.5% 139,704 8J% 557,300 5.0% 29,819 34.0% 235,268 11.4/ 128,036 21.0% 296,231 11.4% 472,426 23.4%
FEBRUARY 1991 168,934 25.4% 308,146 28.9% 155,434 -17% 572,313 4.1% 31,083 26,1% 225,908 132% 116,892 14.9% 285,097 5.8% 534,690 15.6%
MARCH 1991 199,375 32.9% 445,966 50.6% 162,027 -11.8/ 718,269 6.4% 39,765 6.8% 325,123 8.9/ 157,335 3.0% 370,952 -0.7% 683,227 17.4%
APRIL1991 69,452 12.9% 219,124 26.6% 38,116 322% 243,048 0.6% 16,729 8.5/ 244,960 6.8% 134,666 -1.1% 316,761 42% 130,645 57.1%
MAY1991 76,841 39.3/ 204,702 25.2% 9,746 •1.4% 170,893 -7.6% 14,638 54.1/ 303,403 11J/ 237,388 12.0/ 345,715 3.8% 42,852 11.3%
JUNE1991 146,444 22.9% 345,368 63.7% 22,059 4.6/ 284,523 14.0% 18,381 -10.1% 450,719 10.9/ 430,401 6.0/ 427,291 0.1% 122,735 28.1!
JULY 1991 154,387 42.8% 367,912 45.1M 37,912 2.1 % 325,662 14.6% 21,980 12.3% 426,098 14JY 518,745 6.5% 398,205 0.9% 110,948 26.5%
AUGUST1991 154,590 28.5% 393,662 47.9% 49,796 18.3/ 335,927 6.1% 21,185 10.2% 432,332 19.4/ 567,691 25.3% 418,206 4.4% 170,230 21.6/
SEPTEMBER 1991 132,791 6.3% 373,944 68.9% 23,349 -16.8% 293,847 11.2% 18,580 -15.6% 477,387 5.1 % 481,236 -3.8% 445,232 5.5% 151,700 27.4%
OCTOBER1991 74,272 92% 242,620 30.9/ 11,029 46.8% 197,823 -0.3% 15,837 22.7% 321,323 14.1/ 208,843 3.8Y 368,825 1.8% 63,230 68.6%
NOVEMBER 1991 79,876 152% 227,900 3.0/ 15,797 32.7/ 198,806 -0.5% 13,643 -2.5% 266,427 10.7% 164,821 13.2/ 338,528 0.9% 38,052 •34.0%
DECEMBER1991 191,440 22.6% 442,984 33JN 112,512 14.0Y 619,189 7.9( 31,998 6.3% 452,268 14.8% 208,905 4.3% 479,045 1.4% 561,326 22.3%
1,618,445 25.0% 3,846,030 38.4% 771,481 2.8/ 4,517,620 5.8% 213,638 10.6% 4,161,816 11.8% 3,354,959 82% 4,490,088 3.0% 3,142,061 21.2%
- - - - - - - - -
JANUARY 1992 197,167 16.0% 312,012 14.0% 152,259 9.0X, 598,833 7.5% 30,424 2.0% 265,994 13.1% 141,270 10.3M 315,138 6.49/o 598,189 26.6%
FEBRUARV1992 195,661 15.8% 333,758 8.3% 160,764 3.4% 621,265 8.6% 29,565 -4.9/ 264,442 17.1% 146,106 25.0% 312,239 9.5% 652,735 22.1%
MARCH1992 273,926 37.4% 438,364 -1.7% 182,913 12.9% 741,508 32% 43,295 6.9/ 359,409 10.3% 180,591 14.8% 372,547 0.4% 837,310 22.6%
APRIL 1992 75,073 8.1% 270,606 23.5% 46,564 22.2W> 295,252 21.5% 19,935 19.2/ 285,414 16.5% 170,118 26.4% 353,701 11.7% 160,674 23.0%
MAV1992 75,150 -22% 253,008 23.6% 11,580 18.8% 251,059.46.9% 13,404 -8.4/ 348,762 15.0% 258,861 9.0% 398,076 15.1% 42,392 •1.1%
JUNE1992 189,295 29.3% 341,678 -1.1% 33,776 53.1% 266,640 -6.3q . 18,350 -02% 454,460 0.8% 470,100 92% 437,015 2.3% 135,604 10.5%
JULY 1992 154,564 0.1°Y 418,348 13.7% 45,366 19J% 336,427 3.3% 25,750 17.2% 485,467 13.9% 565,744 9.1% 451,371 13.4% 217,565 27.3%
AUGUST1992 179,744 16.3% 470,378 19.5/ 52,414 5.3% 356,478 6.1% 21,180 28.3% 467,448 8.1% 591,899 4.3/ 468,880 12.1% 240,617 41.3%
SEPTEMBER1992 191,304 44.1W 361,300 -3.4/ 30,303 29.8% 315,846 7.5% 25,261 36.0% 479,829 0.5% 530,881 10.3% 472,571 6.1Y 157,872 4.1%
OCTOBER1992 85,977 15.8% 251,946 3.8Y 11J61 1.2% 224,342 13.4% 16,211 2.4/ 359,779 12.0% 240,795 15.3% 426,738 15.7% 54,584•13.7%
NOVEMBER1992 96,751 21.1% 283,184 24.3% 20,092 27.2% 263,731 32J% 17,748 30.1% 282,739 6.1% 166,270 0.9% 399,494 18.0% 78,741'•""'°
DECEMBER1992 259,411 35.5% 469,654 6.0% 130,259 15.8% 695,308 12.3% 35,510 11.0/ 463,462 2.5% 239,335 14.6% 541,595 13.1% 651,268 16.0%
- -
1,974,023 220'K 4,204,236 9.3% 877,451 4,966,689 9.9% 302,633 10.6% 4,517,205 8.5% 3,702,030 10.3% 4,949,365 10.2% 3,627,611 21.8%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
i
'1Co: All Interested Parties ~ ~U 11
b- 3 0 IE'u-oaiu: Cherie 1'aller 949-7097 ifge: Family Center 1Vleeting XC~
Riext MIEMB ~ ~SHIIP meetIlngo
]NAIonn (fty, Septeinber 11th, 1995
. 5e30 - 7:00 pu~i MeetAng
(new) AVON PUBLIC LIB12fi.RY, large conference room
NOTE Board Mee Lll1g wlll foll ovvo 0 0
AGENDA
ll. SeVf-deuta oductuoui/Representing what organization?
2. VJpdate by Exec< ConnQinattee/ll$oau•d ~
30 ?'Q-eseuetaguoau of ?$aasuaiess Pflaea
- discussion
4. C(DtliBi19ttee deeeHopnieuit (this means YOU!)
Sa N~twofl-]kung (iricludes info. sharing/annouiiceiiierits)
If you have an agenclA IlCi11, please call rne (949-7097) so I can arraiige time for discussion.
"L7canks!
If?9ease uiofleo I_,aurie 1Vlactavish no lonber has a Minlurn office, at~d her 827- 9210 tel.
11uM»er 1S NO LONGER VALID. We'Il let yoLt know the new # soon. Please call her at
homP lo !eave a n1essage sn !he inlerin-i.
M/lRK YOfllaZ CALENDAIlgS with these FAMILY CEN1'ER MEMBERSHIP
MEET'INGS:
Occober 2, 1.995
November 6, 1995
December 4, 1995 ANNQJAIL MEIET?NG
- electio»s
- Bylaw review/clianges
!
IMPORTANT MEE'IING INFORII!1AT10N ENCLOSED!!!
I:agle Valley Family Center - - ,
1'ost Of1'ice Box 3098 °S"
li.von, Colorado 81620
~Y FUSi[ ~ ~k •4 rQ•0~ ~ ,
{Jairn [3i-andincyer
~ TUM-~GUMM -TUM RECEI'JED AJG, 2 8 ~~95
UIVION PARK X C G9u,~u.e-
WATER SIJPPLY PR JECT
Gunnism Cuunty, Colorado
WDY].d° S PbSt Cost-~fectgN~, EaVl%'O'Fmmt alloPICl[g
Dlater Ca3servation StoPage Proposal
Proiect Purpoae: To hold Colorado's unused Colorado River Ccmpact waters at
high altitude during wet cycles for augmentation of river environments on both
sides of the Continental Divide during extended droughts.
Site descrintion: 4,500 acre saQe covered boxl that can hold 900.000
~-~,~,,,Q f To N, ac:e feet , off river, with 1qw ~
P4HSe ~ Ce !lecTi'~.,~ -s%6~ Fmr e'a
Tb~i~u]-A~i~S ~re Vd~1 cost rcck fi? led dam. (C.4,v
EebsT ~d@P' ah ,t
Operational concept: Durina sDrina
_ CiooA' runoff, in Sret cycles, surplus
~ co?rmact waters will be oumper in-o
~ gB4 Union Park from existing '^aylor ?ark
% ~ Reservoir for long term cyclic stor-
' age. After several years of drought,
stored waters will be released '--y
' Yopr/as Portr
gravity conduits to the Taylor,
l5'aQmsa~sr Gurn: son , Colora3o, ar.d Scuth n? S=te
Rivers for endangered fish, aildlife,
recreation, agriculture, and immicfpal
needs. I7ai?y peaking power reve_nues
from reversible pumQ/generators will
7oqGor PoPk Darra more than caver spring pimming costs
to fill Union Park Reservoir. Cnion
; Park will ce aworld class Lake :'rout
oc ~ ~~e Llishery. Seasonal fluctuations in
Taylor Park will be elim nated. ~t'ey,a•J~6~
~ er,~r..~~ t-ed~e&,po-wer,
pea"l go
Prolected Cost: $464 llion
o ~ -Q
(EooQ C~dopa For
averaqe Diversion To East 51oDe:
60,000 ac:e :eet, + 60,eo4,4 F EAsTJQiVel:
Yield Multiplier For `iet:o Denver: -
120.OOQ acre feet C~. c J .P' :.JA~' us~a~
UAfsa Povi? Rononoir ~ .4.s carauyAr 44ckipo ,~,r- e~c.'.iT•:+~ ~~s~~ld`S~
Q a E1•90+082. ` Yearly Metzo Denver Cost: $300/acre
foot (about half cost of other alter-
~ natives) PoWer &-e?eNve.,s ,,:rl
UnE@A Pmrrts g@M !
~ redace Ts$;s Co.4-77
Proiect Sponsore Rrapahoe County
(other local, state, and federal
A 1 entities aay join)
n
3
n~~O Completion Tarcret Date: 200f0'
Hoet'Ib Cet Theres From City of Gtannison, drive 30 miles northeast to
'I'aylor Park Reserroir. From 'I`aylog Park, Caake Wi11oHr Creek Road 1 mile to
tfiion Paglc sign• Head south 4 aiiles on Forest Service road to Union Park
dam sige. 'E'wo vteeg driwe vehicles are adequate durirg stumrter and fall,
vim -crea~hes isFeg additie~ ini~oaaation , contact Dave Mi11er,
(719)~1-2003. P.O. Bnoc 567, Paluer Y.aICe, C0. 80133. ,~y-ra.
August 21, 1995
A g?evelopment P9an Fmr ECo?orado's EdoOvnng VYater Crisis
Over the last thirty years Colorado's water development has not kept pace with its
strategic needs for growth, drought protectioq wildlife, recreation, and interstate comgact
obligations.
As a result, Colorado's urban water tap and service fees are now the highest in the West.
The river environmerns and economies of both slopes are becoming more and more vulnerable to
the damaging three to five year drought cycles. Kansas recently won a ten-year U. S. Supreme
Court battle to stop Colorado's over depleeion of the flrkansas River. Federal agencies are
demanding more South Platte River water from Colorado for recovery of endangered migratory
birds in IVebraska. Colorado's Front Range cities have resorted to mining the state's finite ground
water reserves, and other high energy alternatives. The Ogallala Aquifer is also drying up, with
no replacemeat water in sight for Eastem Colorado farmers.
All of these Colorado water shortages are worsening in spite of the fact most renewable
surface water for VElestern states originates in Colorado's high terrain.
West S1ope Sueplu§ li/deanwhile, Colorado's regrettable Colorado River Compact losses
to Arizona, Mevada, and California are also worsening because of the steady Vb'est Slope switch
from high consumption agriculture to tourism, small business, and retirement. Incredibly, there
are no Colorado plans to capture some of the state's wasted Colorado River surplus for statewide
droug-hts and reversal of the growing East Slope water shortages.
Recent Colorado water losses from the Upper Gunnison Basin provide a good example of
the uossiy unbalanced water usage within the state. This untapped basin only consumed about
I°/a of its 199; runoff, and usage will be even less during the 1995 heavy snowmelt year. If half
of this wasted Colorado enritled runoff had been saved in high altitude Gunnison storage, both
, slopes would have more than enough low-cost insurance water for the next five year drought
cycle. .
SoBaation Colorado urgently needs one or more conservation reservoirs on the Gunnison
side of the Continernal Divide to store some of the state's currently wasted wet year runoff.
These saved Colorado waters would then be available, when and where needed, for efficient
gravity augmentation of the Taylor, Cpunnison, Colorado, Arkansas, and South Platte Rivers
during the damaging drought cycles. Headwater sYorage can change damaging floods into liquid
gold for Colorado's environmental and human needs.
Sttate RespmasabaUitv In 1937 the state legislature established the Colorado Water
Conservation Board to help plan, develop, and conserve Colorado's urterstate compact vvaters for
the beneficial use of the state°s current and future generations. Hovaever, Board minutes from the
last tvderity years show the politically sensitive interbasia developQ?ent issues are not openly
addressed to protect state interests in the high stakes competition for edater in the arid West.
- 1
State officials could make up for lost time, while fulfilling their legislative obligation to all
Coloradans, by adopting the following Three Point Colorado Water Devvelopment Plan of
action: -
Prioritv Action No. 1 Arrange for immediate return of the Taylor Park Reservoir Refill
Decree from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to Colorado control.
Comment This unprecedented headwater storage right for 106,000 acre feet was justified
in Gunnison Court to provide more water for Taylor River fish during the heavy runoff years.
The extreme flow objectives in this decres exceed the historic total average flows of the river by
501/o (see chart). If these stigulated "optimal flows" were maintainable, the waxer velocities
would actually harm the fishery. Safe fishing would be impossible.
The real reason for this unreasonable decree, and its subsequent March 22, 1993 transfer
to federa] ownership, is to force unappropriated state waters down river. Influential West Slope
activists readily admit they would rather see Colorado's surplus waters flow out-of-state instead
of to storage and diversion to East slope dry areas. .
The T'aylor Refill eave away is probably the most costly water mana.gement mistake in
Colorado's history-. The rights to guaranteed transbasin water currently sell. for about $10,000
per acre foot in Colorado's water-short Arkansas and South Platte River Basins.
The U. S. Bureau of Reclamation would surely cooperate with an official Colorado reyuest
for early return of the Taylor Refill Decree. This federal agency is required by Congressional law
to assist all Western states with development and beneficial use of their respective interstate
compact entitlements.
Prioritv Action No. 2 Upon return, immediately allocate the Taylor Park Reservoir refill
rights to a Colorado managed conservarion pool within the proposed 900,000 acre feet lipper
Gunnison headwater storage facility.
Comment A state conservation pool would be cooperatively managed to guarantee flows
in Upper Gunnison rivers at substantially higher levels than the state decreed minimums. The
remaining water from the refill decree would be added to other unallocated Upper Gunnison
waters for storage and use by the Front Range urban water providers who construct the facilities.
As an added catalyst to quickly unite local, state, and federal- support, the project
developers would agree to give the state a negotiated portion of their customary right to use and
reuse transmountain water to extinction. Such a cooperative water management concept would
then allow the state to meet its interstate compact and endangered species obligations to Kansas
and Nebraska without adversely impacting Colorado taxpayers and farmers.
Prioritv Action No. 3 Immediately form a high level Colorado team to evaluate,
promote, and facilitate the eariy construction of a headwater storage program for both slopes,
using the vast untapged flood flows of Colorado's Upper Gunnison Basin.
_ 2
e
c~omment If'local, state, and federal leaders would unite behind this proposed multi- .
purpose storage program, Colorado water development could soon recover from 30 years of
infighting, indecision, and neglect. An Upper Gunnison storage capabiiity with gravity conduits to
Colorado's four major river systems could be permitted, constructed, filled, and in service by
2005 at about half the safe-yield cost of any other alternative. The increased Western power
potential from the guaranteed drought flows could further enhance the extraordinary cost-benefit
ratios. The customary adverse environmental 'unpacts, evaporation:losses, and silt build-up
assa;iated with low altitude damming of rivers would not be a factor.
SuenmaIn spite of the current populat notion against dams, there is no substitute for
an off-river, headwater facility that can capture wasted snowmelt for low-cost gravity delivery to the region's natural and human environments during droughts.
Dave MCiller
P.O. Box 567
Palmer Lalce, CO
(719)481-2003, Fax 3452
Encl: Taylor River Flow Chart
-
_ 3
Vail Moc9ern Roundaboeag In$erchange (Revased $/28195) .
- - April------- -j-- - --MeY- - --_I__ ` June _~~^--------.-JuIX August Seetember ~
Task W~rm 419 - _ 4/23 1 517 L 5121 _1 7/16 7130--
_ 8/13812 9/10 9/24
Roaandaboa,ag @ngerclhange
Obs4euction Removal
Earthwork ! Grading ( N. Side )
Earthworlc / Cirading ( N. Side )
Eattftuvork ! C3reding - ( S. Side )
CPAP / Inlets / Manboles r , . . , . .
EIecQric Condufts / Vaults
Cable T!! Conduit / Vautts
Spraddle Creek Boulder Wall ~
Concrete Prep
Pire 6iydrant
10" DIP T~
Road Base Prep
Asphalt Paving - Bottom Lifts
Asphalt Paving - Finai Lifts ~
Yopsoll Ptacetrrent
Sfl8b-C0nt(faCgOB's
Cnncrete Form! Pour / Finish
Payers
j
Rock Watls
99 .
Lan4scape (Tree Repiac¢ ) M : T,
t.andscape ( Irr[gation )
Landscape (Pianting ) `
~ i ~ . . .
: ElsclriC Conduit . . ElecYric Lighting
Otatside lJtuligies
Telephone .
~
Gas - - -
Electric , , ~
r.i ~
..6?o96sei PewEcbng 6.04
GlBYb E1tRensiCn ,
Cabl@'1V Conduit Hau! Of Eucess Dirt
i. y.
! ~1+. ~b
11 4£ w. ~+X..'~`: y~
' : : : : ~ _ikC~Y
• , ,
.E
.
/d
n~
TOWN OF VAIL , 4LA
75 Soutb Frontage Road Department of Public Works/Transportation
Va'il, Colorado 81657
303-479-21581FA X 303-479-2166
August 24, 1995
N[r. H. Michael Miller
Berenbaum, Weinshienk & Easton,. P.C. ` 26th Floor, Republic Plaza 370 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202-5626
Dear N1r. Miller,
I would like to respond to the issues raised in your letter regarding Golf Course service level
changes. Several residents of the neighborhood have expressed displeasure with the changes
made and I have compared the concerns to the schedule changes that took place on this route in
the last three years. The following conclusions can be made:
1. The printed schedule from 1992 to 1995 indicates no change in the 30 minute peak service
on the Golf Course route. I have included copies of the schedules to confirm this.
2. In 1993, the non-peak service was reduced based on low ridership during this period.
Peak service remained nu chan2ed and maintained at 30 minute intervals.
During actual peak times, 8:30A.M. to 10:30A.NT. and 4:OOP.M, to 6:OOP.IVI., we carried an
average of 100 passengers per hour. At non-peak times, the passenger count dropped to 1-10
passengers per hour. Historical ridership figures were used to set an appropriate level of non-
peak service. Included for your review is the ridership breakdown.
a.
Please note that at peak times, cost per passenger is $.16 and at non-peak the cost escalates to
$5.03 per passenger. For the upcoming `95/'96 winter season, we do not plan on increasing bus
service to the Golf Course area. ~
lf you need further clarification of the situation, please feel free to contact me at 479-2173, or Mike Rose, Transit Manager, at 479-2178.
Sincerely,
a
Larry E. Graf , Director ,
Department of Public Works/Transportation
cc: Vail Town Council
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
M'U AUV 1 1 1995 x c.
~u.
' . ToWN oF vAM
. 4;
Iriput/Inquiay Response Record ~
The a4tached comments were recently received by the T'own of t7ai1. We encourage Vail
residents and guests to give us such input and tive strive for timely responses. PLEASE
ADDRESS THESE CONCEIZNS WITHIN FIiTIE WORI<ING DAYS AIVD RETURN THIS
CORRPLETID FORN1 TO PAIvi BRt1IVDNfEyER, .
DEI'ARTMEii'I' TO FiAIVDLE IIVQUIlZX
` IIVVDIiTIDUAI, TO HANDI.E INQLTIlZX
DATE TOV RECEIVID IIVPLJT/INQUIlZY ~1 15
TYPE OF INPUT/INOUIIZY: .
PHOIVE CALL (indicate date)
LETTER (attached) w ~ ~9-d'~-R~C. • ~
~
RFSPOIVSE CARD (attached)
TYPE OF RESPONSE (check one):
LETTER (attach copy)
PHONE CALL (indicate date)
BRIEF SUMIliIARY OF RESPONSE OR AIVSWEIZ T'O IIVOLTIIZY:
DATE OF RESPOIVSE FOIZIVI RETURNED BY DII'ARTMENT TO PAM BRANDNqEYER:
A copy of this inquiry and fotm will remain on 61e at the TOV Community RelaGons office. As soon as this form is retumed to Pam
• Brandmeyer, this inquiry will be considered dosed
• THAW YOU WR YOUIZ'iMFI,Y HAINT)WC OFZI-US MUE IFYOU HAVE ANY QUFSnONS, PLEASE FEEI, FREE Tp COM'ACl'
PAN( B(t.•1NDMEYER AT 479-2113.
A,r;4`..r^ BERENBAUNT, WEINSHIENK & EASON, P. C.
A7TORNEYS AT lAW
e26TH FLOOR, REPUBUC PLAZA ~
..s,x'•'%'' , , .
370 SEVENTEENTH STREET
DENVER, COLORADO 80202-5626
PHONE (303) 625-0800
H. MICHAEL MILLER TELECOPIER (303) 629-7610,
DIRECT DIAL (303) 592-8330
August 7, 1995
Via Facsimite - (970) 476-2157
and Federal Eacpress Mail
Vail Town Council
75 South F'rontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 '
RE: Fallridge Communiry Association
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I represent the Fallridge Community Association. 'g'hey have asked me to contact
you with regard to the pending discussions concerning the. bus system schedule to the golf
course area which serves members of this Association.
'g'he Fallridge Community Association consists of both the Fallridge Condominiums
and the neighboring townhomes. In total, there are approximately 150 members.
As I am sure you are aware, the residents in this area are extrenlely upset and
disappointed over the change in the bus service which was made last winter. In most cases,
the service was reduced to once an hour, compared to once every ten or fifteen minutes for
other areas serviced by the system. As a result of the reduced service, the buses were
extremely overcrowded and often left passengers stranded at the bus stop. Because of this
extreme inconvenience, this resulted in a substantially reduced number of riders on the
system.
T'he results of the reduced service, inconvenience, and reduced usage becomes
obvious. A system intended to assist in the Town's promotion of a clean environment has,
in fact, become counterproductive. A number of people serviced in this area are either
visitors or owners of a vacation residence. 'I'he distance from their units to the center of
town is too far to walk, particularly in the winter. 'I'his results either in substantial increase
in automobile traffic back and forth from the golf course to the center of town, or people
not coming into the business section. In either case, it is extremely harmful to the Town.
Increased traffic usage causes serious environmental problems, as well as overcrowding in
the parking facilities. T'he alternative of not coming into the center of town reduces the
business traffic with the obvious adverse consequence to the Town's merchants.
RENBAUM, WEINSHIENK Bc EASON, P. C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
^F' ?
Vail Town Council
August 7, 1995
Page 2
~
When the service was reduced last year, it was explained that this was done to allow
expansion into new areas. While we are sympathetic with the desire, and advantages, of
such expansion, it makes no sense if this is at the expense of a successful system to the areas
already serviced.
We urge you to give proper consideration to the users in the golf course area. We
believe that the facts well support a substantial increase in service (which existed prior to
the 1994/1995 winter reduction). We urgently request that service be restored to a level at
least with the frequency of the service provided to east Vail, and suggest that the historical
use would even suggest an increase in such service.
Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact me directly.
Very truly yours,
/
H. Michael Miller
HMM/jc
cc: Ms. Marta Cadmus, Fallridge Community Association
Mr. Harvey Deschene, President, Fallridge Community Association ,
jc\hmm\fal(ridg\vail.ltr
- - - ~•.r ¢~y EAST VAFL EXPRE~
BLUE 7:/8
@dGFWURS
p 9~6i~6 '~`666~ 10-PNAff/AKMQ WHOTEUWVRAISD EVEPl1 ~1pliyfl IMEFYALO
Y ufOn Qr. W ~ :0S
Asom lam ~s :W :W so 2.0 o.~ 3:43 A- 2•00 A a:as a-0:ae m e:oo v - ::oo a
_ sideaoounadn ~e 21 ~e si
t :es ~:1a ao Ao :m
eo~ F.re w ss :37 :R ' w» :so bs 20 x ba ~Aspm s
O Raft m Vi1 :0 21 zo So 8oo1h Fs1e ~1 :0! 21 aB
Piwn G1edc Prh :tt 20 :ot SO Fesa tl VYB :53 :OB 7~ ~ b9 28 LLokwaahm Noad :13 29 :49 ~f ~ p~dn Croek Parfc SS :10 25 :10 :40
Cd~ar~6is 1~ Ro~ :15 ~0 :4S ~ ~ 88 :11 1! %1 :11 A1
Stroamside C6db :18 ~t :68 :01 Lupk"-ftiorn qpye : Cohmdne• qpsd ~7 :12 77 :42 :12 :42
~ rn. F.~e :,e aa :au :03gIJS S70PS sa.ar,,.iee cka. :se :13 se A :13 :43
oaoweern wemam eo ust atb :20 :X :50 aa o Mmoer Fal. :oo :~s ao :as :~o :oa
@~fwm PaAt 21 38 s1 m oNLY AT q MeeOowe O2 :17 ~2 :19 :18 :4S
~v,.eom ~ a~ sa m naah GoreklunIper ta,o 23 ae DESIGMA7~ ~ BWioin P.t roo :1e ~ :re :16 :48
~ 8US ST~OPSI r~~ Lm+e eas~ ~a :19 2e ~ :47
PAD" Chh~ To~vrdqrtres ~8 :41 :11 Meadow Lane/Mak+ Oor. :OA :19 24 :49 :17 :47
Cd twm R~d 2a :a9 ~ :19 ?,taln GorelAmipw larna IN :21 :X 31 :18 :40
j Ptdn Gexk PaAt :31 :~8 A9 :16 Main CiOr ROed 08 23 ;30 39 21 :51
Chib 7bwrfiomeo :10 SS :40 ~B 22 :52
~ 8oa7h Fae 36 ~D A6 .20 , z 5treemside Earl :tt 28 :61 M 23 :49
= ew uo,~, ~e as s1 ~121 ~ cok.r,a~e R"a :12 s7 :a sr 24 :sa
~
Tr Cerrter :42 S7 :12 :27 p v~ East Condoe :19 38 :69 $6 25 :ss
tri P19dn Geek Pph :14 29 :8t :59 28 :S@
EAST VAL/ $ Fa9s et VaA :18 31 :48 *t 27 :57
GOL.F COUF3$E 30-MINUYE : Boothfalo :18 :33 :ae 99 29 :se
~ ~ ~ C INTERVALS rO~lf (~Ui~SE ~ Bald Mo~udeYl :18 ~1 :49 AO ~O :00
~ 7:90 P - 2:00 A lj ELL~W • Trdns 25 :40 :SB :10 :N :08
Y ' C6. W
FORD PS4RIC ~
°°ift^~ CHR Gol Course-Ford Parh
~ ~ i
PtwntPn Aoea wes? a~ ~r ~p - ip~vrE urreRVnw GOLF CpOURSE~~p FORD PARK
fioedEsst ~B 6Wnt~o 8:90A-1:~P I ~~~a~~C~O / O ~
14e8 Vh1 varay ~ ~
t6tosur,b„sia?v~ :ao :10 z T m ~ @AORP~IPlG IN90UND AfTERR100PA OUYBOUftlD
Ckbhouse '42 12 ~ ~W :05 :W . I 30•MINUTE INTERVALB Sp-MINUTE INTERVALB
0 1810 9Laft wst Driw :43 :13 m 1810 Subast Dr1a :08 :ig
j!1s n lan0 :47 11 Z 1448 V99 VaM Dti~B 97 ~7 1 6:~0 A-tO:M A I1:00 A-~:00 P
Qm Ba10 A4wxtaM :46 :18 V. Plaffrtm Eao Q8 26 Trans oRellon Ctr. TAC :00 :30 TransDOrts60n C1. (fAC) :00 30
~ BoaM Ftlb :49 :19 Zpwnydw M" .09 m dubtaus9 95 :35 Ooiden P08k :OS aS
fota A W St 21 Z Soccer Fmk! :10 YO 1810 SunMuet DA" _W :36 Socceir Fbid ;pg :36
~POdn C49ok Perk 53 23 CC Go5den Pad :11 :49
LLghWBighm Road :56 :25 ~ T ' Ctr. :iS ~9$ 1648 Vell Vafle DrlvO 07 a7 Wql ;07 ~7
Ptarrn an Esot -0 :38 rtarmi m Emt :OB :W
. . Roed :58 R8 Fad Vak :W 50 Plarm en West 109 :39 1448 Vb0 Vaf1eY DrIMB :10 :40
SlroamsfGe Ckcle :57 27 T ' Qr. gLXL 25 56 $oogr FIq :10 :AO 1810 SinDurot Orlw :11 :41
Q Thrbcr Fab "SB 26 30-ktltdllTE IHTERVAL.B C30109n Pe~ :11 :41 C4bA0uq :12 :CZ
RacgLet CMiD Condoe ".SB ~ ~ ~o~0 2:00 P- t:m P . Tran9 on Ctr. frRC) :15 :45 1810 Sunbtrtsf G'M :13 :0.1
sdlom PBA '00 :30 Z T • Go'. ~D Ford Perk 20 :50 TransportoWn Ctr. :18 :48
A4esdw.a lene Eest A1 31 D i Trani Ctr. 25 :SS FWE Pwlc ' (rRCj
:20 :SO
Main Gore/.An' r lane 02 ~2 0 GoMen PeaEt b6 35
Tr on C!. :25 :SS
Pacqast d,oTawrtwmea bs as E. SoocarFrald ~s ~ AdI~NF OUTBOUND
CoQsrb'visJ6' n Raad :07 :37 2 PWmi e^ Road VVea 97 27 ; 30•NINUTE INTERYALB . , .
~ Ptmm' art FiDed E8e1
COt~dOL V8 38 0:60 P-2:00 A .
w&in c400 Pal* :09 :39 z uae van var~ Drfm :W :40 . BUS S70PS
Faa ~ vba :io :ao o +e,o sur,w" orto :41 ~ T cw. :10 :40 = • ='ONLY AT
o eoovi Fom :12 :ai a ce,cr,«m :12 :42 oaaen Peak :13 :v
Z Bald 0.4ouwain Fload :13 :63 ¢ 1810 51~as1 W~ :19 :q Soccer Fleld 14 :44 - DESIGNATED
p ~ :18 :48 Tran Ctr. :18 :48 Ftartnl an Wast :15 :45
vt~bn A BV.S .5T0PSI
m t810 surbLord ~ ~ -
:19 :48 < FarO Vwk ~0 50 ~mlgan Eed :10 :e8 L . . . ~ :
~ 1448 VB9 Wley OrIw 21 S1 Tr Ctr. iTFQ 25 56 1448 Vell VWley thlve :18 :IE • Pi8RS8 USe ~
o~ ~ s~ BIIS STOPS OPlLY AT taio s~mewot orwe :19 :eg _ a
akono o a, , stopr~~quesf.°
so~ F.ea 24 54 DESIGN~,TED BUS STOPS9 ' 1e10 su.,a,m orn~. n ~a . ~
~ .
n Peak ~ Sb Ford Perk 24 ~4 . POUdAS.
(Mg ~ 58 Trons Ctr. 27 ~7 -
Yrc tion Ctr.
. ;
- - ~ In°T0wY1 ShUftle Vil(a e/[.ionskead
~'~~fl~~tO~~ ; ViLIA(3FJiJONSHE,40
6:15 A - 2:15 A y TO 10 MINUTE IPlTERVALS
o:9oawt.-a:9oarm. ~
• i Rure on 7 b 10 mknAe Mervela befltmlrq et B:t S am fiuro $rouph 2:1 S e~ m
~vosr~ aauuiNurE INrEAVALs
LI" URPLE 0:10 A- 2:10 A
j ~ , . . .
Y dr. (TRO :10 ~ SO ~
a°° sa"°stom S°'od a3 :53 ~ The Town ot Vail operates a wheelchair fN-equipped
~Y ~„Road ~ ~ 7 S ~ paratransd van service for those who are unable to
senass«o c.sok ca,e :1e a~a ss use the fxed route buses.
S"ft POWa° :20 .40 00 ? ^ Rides can be requested on a next-day basis with 24-hour
Vafi i°°' ~211 :a' Al
'advance reservations. Reservations can be made up to two
Aea sartes«s schom as :43 m weeks In advance.
-awportation - ctr• frnc) 27 :47 Ar '
^ The sendce is operated withln the Gmib of the Town of Vail.
~ BUS STOPS 0NLV AT DESIGPlATED BUS STOPSI ~ j 0 For more information or to make reservations, call 479-2174.
. . . - ~
' GOH,F COITRSE
PEAI{ `dIYdTEId
TIMESo OF PEOPI,E CARR%ED COST COST PER PASSENGER
8030AM°10030AN 650000 $10,642 $0o16
4o OOPFZ-6 o OOPN
NORT-PEAK 6V%NTIIt
.18 HOURS OF 30
AZINtTTE SERVICE 9,529 $47, 892 $5 0 03
SiJNMEIt AR1D OF'F°
SFASON 12 , 064 $11,466 $0. 95
TOTAL 86,593 $70a000 .
i (°bus\golf) r
( . ' r
1993 RIDERSHIP AtUMBERS
0
DATE # OF PASS
,
JAN 93 18,679 ,
FEB 93 27,643
MAR 93 19,389
APR 93 11,540
MAY 93 168
.
JLTN 93 798
JUL 93 1,609
AUG 93 1,237
SEP 93 471 '
OCT 93 333 '
NOV 93 1,677
DEC 93 13,049
WINTER 74,529 ,
'
SUMMER 12,064
TOTAL 86,593 TZMES
6:40 AM ° 8:30 AM 2 RIDES PER HOUR X 147 DAYS = 588
8:30 AM -10:30 AM 110 RIDES PER HOUR X 147 DAYS = 32,340
( 10:30 AM - 4:00 PM 10 RIDES PER HOUR X 147 DAYS = 8,085
4s00 PM - 6:00 PM 110 RIDES PER HOUR X 147 DAYS = 32,340
6:00 PM - 2:40 AM 1 RIDE PER HOUR X 147 DAYS = 1.320
74,671
COST WINTER: $58,534.00
COST SUMIriERt 11.466.00
$70,000.00
1 .
~
,
.
Id
n4
TOW1 tl OF C'AIIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 .
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
FOR BNIMED9ATE RELEASE
September 1, 1995
Media Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information Officer
~OWN COUNC9L TO D6SCl,9SS !lACL COIVIIIAOBVS CO~~RACT
AT SE9~~EMBER MEETINGS
(Vail)--The Vail Town Council reaffirmed its position on the Vail Commons
development Wednesday (8-30) after emerging from an executive session which was
held to discuss contract negotiations. Mayor Peggy Osterfoss says the decision to
continue moving forward on the Vail Commons project is unanimous. "If negotiations
are successful, ground could be broken this fall on the housing portion of the project
with more than 53 families moVing into new, local employee homes by spring," she
said. Osterfoss said the decision to proceed--while in the midst of a petition campaign to
suspend the project--comes as the result of careful evaluation. "To their credit, the
Common Sense petitioners have underscored the need to improve our communication
with the community," she said. "We've responded by taking another hard look at the
proposal and by evaluating suggestions made by the public. From the beginning, we
have responded to the neighborhood's request for low-density, owner-occupied family
(more)
RECYCLEDPAPER
~
,
Vail Commons/Add 1
housing; the need for pockets of landscaped areas; a day care facility; and a plan to
address.traffic impacts, including a commitment to prevent access on Chamonix Road.
Most recently, we're looking at a location in which we can accommodate a community
meeting and/or a"pavilion" type facility." Therefore, after careful reconsideration,
members of the Town Council are confident about the plan and feel strongly about the
need to act now on the affordable housing issue, she said.
"We've been promising to provide affordable housing for as long as I can remember,"
Osterfoss continued. "In 1990, we learned an additional 800 units were needed
throughout the valley. Although we've made incremental steps to improve the situation,
such as zoning changes to create caretaker units and development of a mortgage
guarantee program, we have not persevered in previous attempts, in the face of
apparent community opposition, to break ground for affordable housing. This, despite
community survey results which have continued to give this issue priority. While we
have hesitated to move forward, the nature of our community has changed
dramatically. Now, over. 70 percent of our population are second homeowners," she
said.
Town Council members are confident that "master planning" issues suggested by the
petitioners have been adequately addressed, -according to Osterfoss. "We have had
the Vail Land Use plan in place since 1987," she said. "This plan identifies the
Commons parcel as a commercial site and now as a second step, we're creating design
and site plan criteria for the West Vail commercial area." This plan will include details
suggesting access, circulation, landscaping and lighting solutions.
(more)
o ,
0
~
Vaii Commons/Add 2
Agenda items for the Sept. 5 afternoon Town Council meeting will include an update
on contract discussions for the Vail Commons development. Then, later in the day at
the evening Town Council meeting, there will be an overview and timetable for creation
of design and site plan guidelines for the West Vail commercial corridor and an update
on plans to create a day care facility and/or community room. On Sept. 6, the project's
site plan containing 65 dwelling units and a 55,000 square feet supermarket has been
scheduled for conceptual review by the town's Design Review Board.
"Every day that we_delay in moving fonward with this project, more Vail residents find
more affordable housing down valley," she said. "The fact that the Town Council lost
an excellent and dedicated member when Jim Shearer was forced to move out of Vail is
one of many examples. This is a tremendous loss to our community."
"The Vail Commons development is a very good plan with high quality, permanently
deed-restricted, owner-occupied affordable housing for families. It was by far the best
match with our request for proposals. The free market selected the grocery store
concept as a viable funding vehicle for the project. This means the $18 million project
will be financed by the private sector ($8.5 million residential, $9.5 million commercial)
with the exception of a$300,000 grant from the State of Colorado for infrastructure
improvements. In addition, the citizens of the Town of Vail, while being paid over time
for the land, uvill continue to own the land and will own the improvements as well as at
the end of the lease. This is a win-win solution for our community and we look forward
to seeing this effort successfully completed," she said.
# # #
i~
. . .i t~r t 1 :Mi.i.. .41 I!'-V'' . . "1r? -.w n ~ ' UfFicc of Ilic Board o( C:;oinmimioncix ,
1?:tI;Ir Gxnily 13uildinl.
(~)7U) 328-Nl~(.15
1'ax: (s»o) 32e i207 . 11 , O. Jkyx xsn
~r7~r~. (~n~>) ,~a-H~~~» , tiUU I{rt~ut~way
_ i I.q;lc, (".uluradc) N 163 I-Q850
EAGIE CO[N"t'Y, COLOR.ADO'
PAEMORANDUM
~o Regional Taansat Authoriey:
Kent Myess, BCRi Ken4Mue(Ier, Beaves Cree& Resort Company
Peggy Osierfoss, Town of i/ail Mike Gallagher, Town of IVlintusn
. Chris Es4es, Town of C'vypsum Tpm $Ijnes, TQvna of Avon
s 1.p''J•Y:A~•~N•~ r.•,:,.,. ,r, ~~b
I)uane Zieglcr, Town of Eag{e James Johnson, Eagle'~~o~iir~
~'o~nm of Red Cliff (Vacas~t)
Alterna4es:
Rieha$d Cames, T'ovvn of Avon Jeff Shro18, Tovvre of Gypsurn .
Tom Steinberg, Towm of ilail Y.aray Stone, Town of 1lRin4urn
George Itoussms, Eagle County
'FROMo June Deane, AdtninistraYive Assistant
~AM Septembev 1, 1995
RE= Regional Transit Au4}eorlYy Meehng
'd'hc firsg meefing of the Rcgiona! Transit Authority vvill be hcld:
nuisdaqq Sepfr-mbeir A4fl 1995
9000 2.BL Qo 12:00 eaooae
Sauag?e.Ta~e Cleeb House
Edwmds, C09omdo . , , . . , Ilf you have any questions pBease call me at 328-8605.
1d
I RECEPVED P1G 3 ~ ~ggq
oq O°,~ eW 0 0°0 V a o°~ ~V OT @a~~~ 0 'q'O oo
IQ
O
X C ' C'F~
O
~ ~ou're gnv8 ~~d tO a El
O ~
D p
O 0
o C~~~~rad~ ~~~~tain College 0
~ D
p Co~1~.~1~1fl~.~I Mee~.g~Ag O
D
O p
O p
o ll~ua°posee o
~ To gather your ideas for the future of t;7
CMC. We are planning new facilities and 0.
0
~ programs for Eagle County to prepare us for ~
p the 21 st century and want to krtovv vvhat p
0 vvould serve you best. You are the `o
p cornmunity in coynmunity college and your D
0 perspectives ancl suggestioms are vital to our °
0 0
~ success in serving you. Please invite others ~
O you think vvould be interestecl. p
D p
0 O
p Where and When: o
o Eagle Senior Center, September 12 °
0
o Edvvards Elementary. School, September 13 0
~ Westin Hotel, September 14 ~
O p
0 71'amee 7 to 9:30 p.rn. each night o
0 0
D ~
0 .~'lease attend the session most convenient foryou and we would 0
0 appreciate an 1rZSVP at 476-4040 to help us prepare. O
~ D
O p
~ Refreshments will be provided. o
o D
o CD a
~v~ ~°~~m o°~ 12~*,;6 ~O Oe* ED 0
' „ •:1.. i. . di.i , . ? . 1. f•l.U....
OFfice (,f thr lii,.lril ci1 (.umimssi<inccN k1};lc• C:uunty IZuilding
(9'%0) 31R-ti605 . I'.( liIJx $$(1
F:ix, (970) 328 7207 sr?t, Rmadway
'I])I): (970).32R-87!)'/ f;a91c, (.;r>loradc?RIfi31-f185U
EAGLXECOUNTY, COLORADO
MEMo~AN~UM
TOo AIB Media arad lnterested Parties
FROM: June Deane, Administra4iee Assis4ant
DA11 E: SeplemMBr 1, 1995 ~iilln.kUiRy: r ~i,y.;,...yr Ii,rl •»,inyin r•y:,l: v,':,.i .m..., ,.i+l M"1.. :...yl~:. .
REo &09-AAItlYBES TO THE /'CGE1`lLd69 Fo9l II r9~ EA67LE Bo/iRal/ . . .
~OUNTY COMMISSIOIVERS
The fol9owing item has been added to the September 6, 1995 agenda:
1:30 - 1a45 de REVllSED COIVT'RACT BETVVEEN EACiLE COUR9TY9
STATE OF COLORADO AN(D GLOBAL ELECTIONS
SYSTEM
Sara Fisher, County Clerk & Recorder
ACT9ON. Cansider appraval.
4:00 - 4~16 RESOLUT@ON REGARDlIVG T1iE APPR01/AL OF THE
HORSE M0UNTP,IN NIETROPOLIT'AN DISTRICT .
Mary Jo Berenato, Deputy Counhr Afforney
ACT8ON: Cansider approvai.
af you have any questions please call 328-8605_
cc: Board off County Commissioners
Jarnes R. FrAtze, County A4torney
. Allen Sar4ira, Finance Directar
Sara Fisher, Clerk & Recorder
,Dack Bngstad, Publec Informatian Officer
;d
_ Van aauy saa„raay, saptemeer a, 1eas -Page Qs
au
~~~•N !b~ ~ .
. WOIZLD
0
Roundabout at
When I was in college I had a lot of intemst in four or Sve tliings. Not
nece,ssarily in this order, but they weae, surfing, drawing cartoons, matb,
engioerring and, of counse, girls. I don't thirilc I ever majored in any one
subject since I dropped out in my senior year to go skiing. I took courses in
surve3'lng, analYtical SeometrY~ WOUPhYsIcs, calculus (both differential and
integial), life diawing, astionomy and aeronautical engineering.
' Don't ask me why I don't iemember much of what I studied, I do
. remember my asunphysics teacher maldng us leam the equation to calcu-
late the velociry nece,ccary for a rocket to escape from the gravitational pull
ather than Labor Day marking the end of the _ of the eanh, how big a rocket it would have to be and how much payload
- summer, it actual}y is-a preview-in-miniature it could carry. Once we leamed the equation and passed the tesc he told us,
V o f how the roundabout will handle holiday trdf- 'NoW you can forget it because that will never happen in your lifetime. fic. We're glad to have the roundabout, and here are There iS waY Possibie for science to build a rocket that will leave eanh's
' our top 10 reasons why:
So much for science. 10. KeepS Vail moving to the right, Today I have a hatd time working a simple algebia problem and I always
~ 9. Helped former Vail police chief make timely career let my wife balance my checkbook That's because I flunked creative writ_
~ decislOn. ' ing and whatever I-write on the check stubs makes no sense whuscever to
8. Our spell checker learned a new word. me or anyone else, espaciallY mY wife.
However, our lives are govemed every day by arithmetic calculation.
7. Four-way stop sounded so negative. ( Remember rhose wdtten 9uestions You had co develoP an ~
~ equaaon for.
6. More "dumb tourist" stories to tell. i Here ate a few for today.
~ 5. Plenty of material for lame TT columns. , How much shaild you pay for a mountain bike so yoa can geq to the top
4. Vail needed another ice-skating rink. of old Heazc Attack Hill one ana a half minuces sooner?
3. Aspen has Hard Rock, Vail has hard plac--. '°`fter hOw ma"Y tums, on 6ow many ski runs, on how many days of sid-
2. Kee s retenhous stiefCh limousines out of [own. i"g ~g a winter dces it become cost effective to buy a season pass for
P P X douars ratner than buy aaily us ackeu?
. Council didn't waste the $2.5 million on employee How much fuel does it take to troll in a small boat, at what altitude and "
n g. how far to catch your limit of trout?
lrhouS.
~'ound: Someone found a camera on Booth/Piney HON' ~Y do you have to work to earn X so you can do Y after
Trail. To claim (must describe and give dates lost) call , the Mecry Band of Poliacians in Washingcon take their fair shazie off the
of your paycheck? ~
Joe at 926-8090. A happy 22nd birthday to Kenny . How many ciry council members does it take to vote "Yes" to spend
She¢'Il', know to friends as Kenc$oggea', who is leaving how many millions of dollars to convert a four-way stop into a nine-way
~ Vail today for Bolivia. May his dreams to become ' scop?
world dictator come 1rue. HoW many man hours a[ $10 an hour dces i[ rake co reach the 00,000
If you like winter, you dOn't have to w3i[ until a year the,new rounda6out wIll save by putting the former flag wavers out
of a job?
Qj. November or fly to Chile for a taste of snow. Let's see, that's 10,000 man hours or 6ve flag-waving persons could
?S Please see wn T Page 52 direct traffic 40 hours a week for 50 weeks a year for the 00,00p, pr for
the same number of hours for 25 years for the cost of the roundabout
How many wm,cked cars will provide how many jobs for how many tow
auck opecators, auro body repainnen, auto paint sprayers and rental agents
selling toundabout insurattce? •
How many names on a petidon did it take to get gun control on the bal-
lot? How many voters would have cast a ballot if the nine=way stop had
been on the ballo[ instead of gun contml?
Simple arithmetic.
Zero is the same number of trips a lot of people make w the city coun-
cil meetings no matter what the amount of tax dollars being spenG L.et's see now. E=MVz, divided by the number of cas per minute
aPProaching the roundabout at the legal speed limit of 65 miles per hour
and 6ave to decelerate to 11.75 mph ro negotiate the fust roundabout with
a 45-foot radius. (These figures were supplied by a Detroit Auto testing lab-
oratory and was the maximum spaed on a dry road with no dust, dut, rain>
ice or snow without skidding and dated March 18, 1995).
Now if I approach the roundabout at 70 mph eastbound on I-70 and azn
followed immediately by 17 other people who aze late to woflc, and all are
following me at a less than legal distance, how faz and for how long will
we all be backed up waiting for the cars that have already negotiated round-
about No. I since ihey were driving westbound on !-70 and have already
outdueled the PeoPle tryin8 to enter the cvundabout fiom Nrnth Frontage
Road and are aLso trying to get to the Vail &-ee parldng before 8 a.m.?
They will be coming out from under the undeipass like ants 6eading for
, a watermelon.
'Ibe simple way to solve this equation is to slide in behind a four-wheel-
• drive Suburban with Texas olates. a bumner crirke, r?,ar "tr - ti-_
arru years all new people," and centai snowboards on the roof and just
follow it through the nine-way stnp equatian.
There is 26 inches of new powder and the parldng snvcture is full and
you now have to go back througfi both mundabouts again because you got
henied by your right exit the fitst time around and this time try for the Lion-
shead padcing structure,which will be almost fiill by the time you make it.
The equapon of time is now on your side becanse you can get a half-day
lift ticket and the money you save will buy the gas you bumed while trying
to solve the calculus problem pmsented by the nine-way stop.
Was it differential or integral calculus?
By now, five of the 19 flag persons who were going to be put out of work
by the consttuction of the new and exciting bumper car ride but are back
direcdng uaffic, are on their hourly coffee brealc for the many roundabout
route directois. Their coffee and doughnuts are fumished by the Ajax
wmcldng company, which has the eacclusive haul-away concession for cars
that have sustained right-side damage, and the Zephyr Fender Bender Co.,
which oNy hauls away cazs with damage on the left side.
Arithmetic being what it was when I was in college and with that escape "
velocity equacion spinning around somewheee in the folds of my aging
brain, maybe somewhece in someone's brain is a soluaon w help make the
neat oouple of roundabouts the city council builds a little moie complex so
we don't have to wait 50 years or moce until science advances faz enough
so we can acwally use the Roundaboat Escape Velocity equation.
U4Lgj' MLW' 4X~ a~ C~.-~,~,i~'~
~;~~`~4'~.- • ' T6w . .
- I
. ,
moneyfrom Eagle Coun-cou~.c~:~
o o
go to pay fo~° ~.pacts i~o~ ILea~e I
Rpoposafl t(b ing to George's explanation, the money
actually comes ovt of the state treasary.
addresS".IlneqAflIltIles . oMoney will be allocated by the' •
° o state treasurer to a local growth impact
Il~ ~~~ort regIlonis fund: Three members of each entity -
?.B ~I~~ ~~S$ ~ . • • for purposes of example, three each
• Times Managing Editor, 1:. i' from Eagle and Lake counties - will
monitor the money and decide how to ~
Next Januay state legislators will use it.
probably be looking at;legislation that To pursue this hypothetical ex-
' would divert revenue from high-growth • ample, suppose Eagle and Lake
areas such'`as Eagle County to impacted counties did enter into a pact. The
neighboring coun[ies like.Lake Counry. county commissioners could decide, for .
Yep, and without'nicking Eagle ; example, that the money should go to
County's'budget, says" State. Rep. , Lake County's family care center. Or
Russell George, a Republitan from perhaps [o Lake County transportadon ~
Rifle. - , to Vail and Beaver Creek.
It's like Santa Claus has been hiding It just doesn't have to be counties,
ou[ for some time, and only lately has tliough. Vail and Red Cliff could enter 1v
been discovered hiding out in the State into a similar agreement. . t
Capi[ol. The premise of his bill is thac. -
there are actually svrplus revenues WHgRE DpEg the money come rD
going into state government. from, you undoubtedly are. asking. c~
While he is. thinking Vail and Does this mean that Eagle County, ' Leadville while drawing up his bill, which says it can't afford to pay for. ~
George's mo[ivation probably is closer open space or bus transportation' and C"
to home. Increasingly in recent years, lots of other things, would be giving
Rifle has become ' a bedroom money to Lake County?
communiry for Aspen, located 75 miles No, the sugar daddy here is state '
away. People work in, Aspen,: spend government, ivhich collects both sales
their money a[ Wal-Mart in Glenwood tax and income taxes across the state.
Springs, and play in the parks in Rifle. • ~ qnd, apparently, it must have a surplus.
t1 similar-- complaint. is'voiced in The money that would be. earmarked
Leadville, where public officials say would be based on how much sales tax
they are saddled with takirig care of and income taxes are paid in Eagle
low-income':•residents attracted to the County to the state.
area by the jobs of the, Vail Valley and ' George told local 'officials recently
Summit Connty. ' . I I ; that he has no intent of s ecifinn how
Eagle Counry Commissioner.John- the money would be'used ghese.
nette Phillips is "delighted with ttieibill. ~,.;ntergovernmental agreemerits. "I have?,.
Active during the last two years in the great confidence that the money.will be'
five-county Rural Resort Symposium, spent wisely," he said. "But even if it's
she pointed,,, out,.that ._impacts to not, that's not mine to decide.";
-adjacent counties was one of the three Unlike the revenue-sharing con- `
; key tasks identified at,lastrDecember's cepts spawned in'Was}iington, D:C.,,....::'
; summit meeting at Beaver Creek. during the 1960s and 1970s, when .the
federal government began taxing more
' %.'HEdiE'S HOW-':IGEOrge's plan and specifying - often very specifically`
would work; : - how it would be spent at state and .
-Growth.entities would be defined local levels, George believes stace'
; by the,per capitar'revenue,generated. by government does not know best.
i. that. en[ity;-sucli;.as'Eag1e~ County,.,;.:, ~
r during the'preceding; fiscal`~year GgqygGE CO%CEI)ES his, bill has:._,;
that revenue:.is';greatersthan the'..per; little chance of succeeding, given the: '
: capita revenue, statewide. for the~ same
fiscalyear. .mood of the legislature and issues.
' - A subsidizingrentity (sa Lake along the Front Range;, which has more'
y than 80 percent of the state s ti
pop
Coun -
ty) uses.the same formula, but to lation. But George'also said he believes
qualify as a• subsidizing entity,,that, .,;t's a good idea, and he's counting on figure must. be at least 10 percent less the support of Gov. Roy Romer, with his
than tHe growth entity, 'as wel] as the strong political constituency.
statewide per capital revenue: Too he's counting on the timing,
*If the two governments . agree, now that the state's spotlight has been
they can enter;a;pact for;:essentially, focused on resort commuriities•and `
revenue sharing - except that, accord- growing inequalities of wealth.