HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-09-12 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VABL T0WN COUNCIL
WORIC SESSION
TUE~DAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995
1:00 P.M. @N TO@! COUNCIL CHAI1ABEF3S
1. Jeff Layman 15 Year Anniversary.
2. Annie Fox 10 Year Anniversary. .
3. Employee Survey Results.
4. Vail Commons Discussion.
5. PEC Report.
6. DRB Report.
7. Information Update.
8. Council Reports. ,
9. Other.
10. Executive Session - Legal Matters.
11. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOfVVIIVC MEETIIVG S7ART TIMES BELOUV:
(,4LL TIMES ARE APPROXInAA?TE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
IIIIIII
THE NEXT VAIL T'OWN COUNCIL RECaULAR UVORK SESSION
WILL BE ON Yl1ESDe4V, 9/99/95, BEGIIVfVING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CFIAMBERS.
THE FOLL01fllING !/,AIL TOUVN COUNCIL REGULAR VVOFtK SESSION
lNILL BE ON TvESDAV, 9/26/95, BEGIIVNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAnABEFiS.
THE NEJCT V,41L YOVUN COUNCIL REGl9LAR EVENING IIAEETING
lIUILL BE Oid YflJESDAY, 9/19/95, BEGINNIiVG AT 7:30 P.M. YN TOV COUNCIL CHABABEFiS.
IIIIIII
C:WGENDA. WSE
VA@L TOWN COUNCIL
.
WORK SESSION
Tfl3ESDAV, SEPTEnABER 12, 1995
1:00 P.M. EN TOi/ COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGEIVDA
1:00 P.M. 1. Jeff Layman 15 Year Anniversary.
1:05 P.M. 2. Annie Fox 10 Year Anniversary.
1:10 P.M. 3.' Employee Survey Results.
Dick Dugdale
Jeannie IVewman
1:40 P.M. 4. Vail Commons Discussion.
Andy Knudtsen
Susan Connelly ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUiVCIL: Direct Town fVlanager
Tom Moo.rhead to enter into contract with City Market.
2:10 P.M. 6. PEC Report.
IViike Nlollica
2:25 P.M. 7. DRB Report
Randy Stouder
George Ruther
2:40 P.M. 8. Information Update.
2:50 P.M. 9. Council Reports.
3:00 P.M. 10. Other.
3:10 P.M. 11. Executive Session - Legal Matters.
3:40 P.M. 12. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMBIVG MEET9NG STAFiT TInAES BEL01M:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXY Ve41L 1'OWN COUNCIL REGULAR V?/ORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/19/95, BEGIfVNIiVG AT 2:00 P.M. lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBEFiS.
THE FOLLOVUING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR V!/ORK SESSION
WILL BE ON 1'UESDAY, 9/26l95, BEGINNINC A7 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VA1L T'OVUN COUNCIL REGl9L.AR EVENING nAEETING
VNILL BE ON Tf9ESDAV, 9/99/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAIVIBERS.
IIIIIII
CA,4GENDA. W SE
INORK SESSION FOLLOVV-UP
TOPeC QUESTIONS F0LL01N-UP SOLUT@ONS
1995
10119 SNOW STORAGE LAND PURCHASE LARRY/BOB McL; Immediately pursue purchase from VA of Current discussions presume a decision in 6 months (April '95). VA has
current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres asked to dump snow at this location. Because of our environmental liability,
adjacent to the west. this request was denietl, Larry, Bob, and Tom are following up. Joe Niacy
was in to see Larry again this week. Has taken the lease to VA attorneys to
address environmental liability issue.
02/15 CHUCK ANDERSON YOUTH PAUUJAN: Contact VRD about moving up the selection HavAng receaved anput on9y from PeQer Abuasi, Paul os moving forvvard
AWARD process to allow awards to be given during Niay PRIOR to wlpuaYterag ooa pVace the new program am,d iQs cr64eria.
(request: Strauch) graduation or to be included with the graduation ceremonies.
05/23 EHUIEHU/COMMERCIAUEHU TOM: Council directed Town Attorney to prepare an Tom will be corresponding with both Holy Cross Electric antl Public Service
EXENiPTIONS ordinance which woultl require all employee housing units in Company.
the Town to adhere to all ordinances, rules and regulations in
effect as may be amendetl from time to time. TOM/SUSAN: Council would like to explore a formula which
would require employee housing units within commercial
development projects based on the percentage of full time
equivalent employees associated with the project.
TONi/BOB: Council agreed to pursue an idea by Merv Lapin ~
in which residents of employee housing units, such as the
future Vail Commons project, could be exempt from franchise
fees collected b utilities to reduce the cost of housin .
'05/23 NEWSPAPER BOXES BOB: Council reiterated its interest in consolidating Bob will meet with newspapers re; locations. Snow removal concerns
newspaper boxes on public properry in the commercial core have been addressed as we99 as amap vuith proposed locations and a
areas and asketl Town Nianager to share an action plan at its lotfecy sysfem. This shou@d be back to CoaanciE by 9/26195.
next meetin .
06/06 BUILDING AND PLANNING SUSAN: Merv Lapin wonderetl how we monitor accuracy of This discussuora uvill be oncluded in kicbc-off budgeR ovecvaew on
REVENUE FEES builtling violations by applicant. (What is originally declared 10/3195.
and assessed vs, as built .
September 8, 1995 Page 1 of 2
09105 WATER/SEWER TAP FEES BOB: In re: affordable housing, continue negotiations
with a ro riate s ecial districts.
09/05 LOADING FACILITY TOM/BOBlLARRY/SUSAN: Compile pros/cons for such
facility to be discussed as ASAP in Council executive
session.
September 8,1995 Pagel_of 2
G
i
,i
P:
z
m
`f.
i
j
I
i
~ LOYEE OPI NION SURVEY
~
~
i
i ,
5
a
a
i' -
~
s
~
`
PREPARED F o
~
. T WN OF VAI L
7
d
PREPAREO BY:
MOUNTAIN STATES
EMPLOYERS COUNCIL, INC. `
P.O. 8ox 539
Denver. Cotwatlo 80201-0539
~ (303) 839-5177
April, 1995
~
TOWN OF VAIL ~
EMPLOYEE OPINIOW SURVFY ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
` The TOV Employee Opinion Survey was coriducted xn April, 1995
by-Mountain States Employers Council, Iric. All persoiinel at
TOV were asked to participate during worlc time. 148 out of
270 employees completed the survey questionnaire for a
response rate-of 55%_ tJhen the survey alas conducted in June
1992, the response rate was 76%.
The questionnaire contained a lotal of:
X 69 Multinle Clioice Questions
37 Standard Questions (aiitii norms) •
32 Custom Questions
X 7 Open Ended (essay) Questions
~ 5 Demographic Sorts
The multiple clioice questions are scorecl on a 1.0 to 4.0
scale, with 4.0 heing the most positi.ve possible score.
Remember, the hiqher the numerical valuA, tlie more positive
the results regardless of how the question is worded.
The numerical v~lttes used in this survPy can generally be
interpreted as follow:
3.0 and above Very Positive
2.8 - 2.9 Positive
, 2•6 - 2.7 Somewhat Positive
2•5 Neutral.
2.4 and below Negative
\
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUMCIL, INC.
t
y
° TOWN OF VaII
~ EP9PLOYEE OPIPdIOid SURVEY
EXECUTIVE SUPIPIARY
Overall, the score for TOV was a Positive 2.8 which is .1
above the overall 1992 survey score. In comparing just the
norm questions which were asked by TOV, tiie organization had
an average score of 2.9 compared to the norm average score
of 2.9.
The 69 multiple choice questions were placed in 10 subject
• categories. The specific category scores ranged from a high
of 3.2 for the F90URS APID WORKIPdG COIVDITIOIdS Category to a
Iow of 2.3 for the PAY Category.
CATEGORY AVG.
HOURS AND 6dORKING CONDITIOPdS 3.2
BEPdEFITS 3.1
EP9POWERMEidT 3.0
SUPEO2VISIOid 2,9
'
JOB SATISFACTIOid 2,8
GOAL SETTIPIG 2.7
P9APdAGEiNEMT 2.7
CL%MATE/CULTURE 2,6
COFiF9UPdICATIOP! + 2.5
PAv 2.3
2.8
-2 -
P10UNTAIPd STATES EPIPLOYERS COUNCIC, IPdC.
~ TOWN OF VAIL
. Opinion Survey Results
By Category
Survey Score -
4.0
3.5
_ .
3.0 .
2.5
, 2.0 - - 1.5 ~ 1.0
Hrs.B W.C. Empower. Job Sat. Mgt. Commun.
Benetits Supv. Goal Set. CII/Cul Pay
3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3
TOV's Overal i S core 2.8
~
W .
W q ~
,
' TOWN OF VAIL
~ dJEIGHTED AVERAGE BY PROFILE
PROFILE PROFILE Np,
PJO. TYPE CODE DESCRIPTIOPJ PART. AVERAGE
1 WORK LOCATIOPd 1 FIRE DEPARTMEidT 16 3.0
2 POIICE DEPARTP9ENT 36 ~ 2.5
3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPPIENT 13 2,9
4 PUB.ddKS/RDS.& ST.P9AINiFAC.WiAItd 28 2,7
5 BUS/PARCC.STRUC.iLAPJDSCAP.&PARK 9 2.9
7 FLEET P9AIPJTEtdANCE 13 2,8
8 D.P./FIPlAPICEiSALES TAX 10 3.1
9 LIBRARY g 2.8
10 ADP9Ih1. SERVICES 13 3.3
11 PdOT SPECIFIED 1 2.7
PROFILE TOTAL- 148 2,8
2 EMPlOYEE STATUS 1 REGULAR FULL-TIP9E 133 2,8
3 SEASONAL g 2.8
5 FIRE DEPT.RES.STUD.iPART-TIP9E 6 2,6
6 PdOT SPECIFIED 1 2.7
PROFILE TOTAL- 148 2.8
3 SEX 1 FEiWALE 47 2.9
2 FiALE 101 2,8
PROFILE TOTAL- 148 2,8
4 AGE 1 29 YEARS APdD UPIDER 25 2.8
2 30-39 YEARS 55 2,8
.
3 40-49 YEARS 52 2.8
4 50-59 YEARS q 2.9
5 60 YEARS AND OVER 6 2.8
6 MOT SPECIFIED 1 3.1
PROFILE TOTAL- 148 2,8
5 LEPdGTH OF SERVICE 1 UIVDER 5 YEARS 65 2.9
2 5 YE/lRS, LESS THAPd 10 YEARS 38 2,7
3 10 YEARS, LESS THAN 15 YEARS 24 2.8
4 15 YEARS AfdD OVER 21 2.8
PROFILE TOTAL- 148 2,8
GRAND TOTAL- 2,8
NOTE: For reporting purposes, Parking Structure/Landscape & Parks
are combined with the Bus Department. Part-time and Fire
Department Resident Students are combined. Participants
with over 20 years of service are reported with the 15 to
20 years group.
' -4 -
P70UPdTAIPd STATES EP9PLOYERS COUNCIL, IP1C.
6
TOWtJ OF VAIL . ~
EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVFY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MOST POSITIVEiMOST NEGATIVE
Among all multiple choice questions askPd, tlie most positive
and most negative results are as follo4r:
MOST POSITIVE
Quest. Co. ~ Prev.
No. Question AV9. ~ AVq• Norm
~
4 DO YOU FEEL THE EMPLOYEE COST 3.5 ~ 3.2 NiA
FOR MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE ~
IS REASONABLE? ~
I
66 IS THE TOWN MANAGER WILLING TO 3.5 I 2.7 NiA
TALK WITH•ANY EMPLOYEE IF THE ~
EMPLOYEE DESIRES? ~
I
10 DO YOU HAVE A LOT OF FREEDOM 3.4 I 3.2 NiA
TO GET YOUR JOB DONE?. ~
' I
32 ARE SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3.4 ~ 3.3 3.1
AVAIIABLE WHEN YOU NEED THEM? ~
I
43 IS YOUR SUPERVISOR WILLING 3.4 ~ 3.4 3.4
TO HELP OR ANSWER QUESTIONS
YOU HAVE CONCERNING YOUR WORK? ~
I
18 DO YOU FEEL THE TOV IS 3.3 ~ 3.2 3.2
CONCERNED ABOUT THE SAFETY ~
OF ITS EMPLOYEES? f
I
56 DO YOU ENJOY YOUR JOB HERE? 3.3 ~ 3.3 3.3
I
58 ARE YOU GIVEN A CHANCE TO USE 3.3 ~ 3.3 3.2
YOUR OWN JUDGMENT WNERE CON- ~
DITIONS WARRANT IT? ~
~
12 . DO,YOU FEEL TOV'S BENEFITS ARE 3.2 ~ 3.1 2.9
ADEQUATE TO MEET YOUR NEEDS? ~
. ~
13 ARE YOU TREATED FAIRLY 3.2 ~ 3.0 3.1
BY YOUR SUPERVISOR? ~
I
19 ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH YOUR 3.2 ~ 3.2 3.3'
CURRENT WORK SCHEDULE? ~
~
33 IS YOUR SUPERVISOR HONEST WITH .3.2 I 3.2 3.2
YOU? ~
I
55 DOES YOUR SUPERVISOR UNDER- 3.2 ( N/A 3.2
STAND YOUR JOB? ~
~
57 WHEN YOU HAVE A WORK RELATED 3.2 ~ 3.1 3.1
PROBLEM, DO YOU GO TO YOUR ~
SUPERVISOR FOR HFLP? ~
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUNCIL, INC. •-5
TOWN OF VAIL
¢ EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVEY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MOST NEGATYVE
Quesf. Co. ~ Prev.
No. Question Av9• ~ Av°• Norm
~
24 DO YOU BELIEVE THERE ARE 2.1 ~ N/A N/A
COMP9UPlICATION PROBLEP7S ~
BETWEEP! DEPARTP9EPdTS? ~
~
48 bdOULD YOU ACCEPT A JOB AT 2.1 I 2.3 2.8
ANOTHER ORGANIZATIOid DOIPdG THE ~
SAWIE JOB AS YOU DO HERE, ddITH (
THE SAP7E PAY, SCHEDULE didD ~ BENEFITS? (
I
1 DOES THE TOV MAKE AP! ADEQUATE 2.3 I 2.6 2.6
EFFORT TO TELL YOU HOW PAY IS ~
DETERIWIPdED? ~
I
14 ARE THERE OPPORTUNITIES FOR 2.3 I 2.2 2.6
AD1lAidCEP1EPlT FOR QUALIFIED ~
EPNPLOYEES IM TWE TOU? ~
I
17 DOES YOUR PAY PROVIDE YOU WITP1 2.3 ~ 2,3 N/A
.
A tREASONABLE STANDARD OF ~
. L%N%PfG APlD LIFESTYLE? ~
I
23 GlHERf CHAWGES ARE P9ADE IN TNE 2.3 ~ 2.2 2,4
OPEIRATIOW AT THE TOV, DO YOU ~
FEEL THE IPdTERESTS OF ~
EPNPLOYEES ARE CONSIDERED? ~
I
36 IPf GEPlERAL, IS COP9MUNICATIOP! 2.3 ~ N/A N/A
. AT THE TOV GOOD?
. '
45 DO YOU FEEL FiSNAGEMENT bdILL 2.3 ~ 2,1 2,4
TAaE STEPS TO'CORRECT THE ~
PROBLEVWS IDEPdTIFYED BY TFIIS ~
SUR!!EY? I
I
16 IPd GENERAL, DOES WiAPIAGEiWEPdT 2.4 ~ 2,3 N/A
KPdObd bdHAT ° S GOING ON AT YOUR ~
LEllEL OF TPIE ORGAPlIZATIOP!? ~
I
38 DOES YOUR SUPERNISOR APPLY 2,4 ~ PdiA 2,8
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES ~
COWSISTENTLY? ~
I
46 IS WIORALE IN YOUR WOROC 2.4 ~ N/A N/A
GROUP 69IGH? ~ -6 -
P10UNTAIP! STATES EiWPLOYERS COUNCIL, IPIC.
TOWN OF VAIL EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVEY ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS SURVEY
Follow-up surveys provide consistent measurements for
management on effectiveness of changes. Comparisons of an
organization to itself over time are considered more
imPOrtant than comparisons to the overall norms. The
comparisons of ttie TOV 1995 and 1992 survey results for
questions that were asked in both surveys are as follow':
1995 1992 Deviation
Categorv Avs• AV9• from 1992
COMMUNICATION 2.7 2.4 . .3
EMPOWERMENT 3.2 3.0 .2 MANAGEMENT 2.7 2.5 .2
HOURS AND WORKING CONDITIONS 3.2 3.1 .1
JOB SATISFACTION 2.8 2.7 .1
BENEFITS 3.1 3.1 .0
SUPERVISION 3.0 3.0 .0
PAY 2.3 2.5 .2-
-7 -
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUNCIL, INC..
TOWN OF VAIL
. ~p 0 0
inioIl 0 uI1 vey Resufts
Compar0~~~~ ~~sufts
Survey Score
400
,
3 e ~ .
30 0
2.6
2.0
1.6
100
Commun. Mgte Job Sat. Supv. Pay
EmpoweP. HPae& W.C. Benefl4s
9995 ~ 2.7 3.2 2.7 3,2 2.8 3.1 3.0 2.3
1992 ~ 2.4 ~ 3.0 2e5 3.1 2.7 3.9 _ 3.0 2.5
9995 Overali Score 2.8 •
9992 Overall Score 2.7
,
~ ~
TOWN OF VAIL ~
EM('LOYEE OPINION SURVFY
EXECUTIVE SUMMt1RY COP1('ARISON TO f'F',FuTOU~ SURVEY (Cont'd)
More specificelly, the resulting scorf-cz Ifiat deviated the
most from the 1997_ TOV survey resul-t< <•+-re:
P9R5T POSITIVE M01lr-FiEi4T
i~uesi. 1995 1992 Devia tion
tJo _ Q_uestion Avg_._ Avg_ from 1992
66 IS TtiF Il)ldil t1ANAGER NJILLING TO 3.5 2.7 .8
TALK 6JITH ANY EMPlOYEE IF THE
fMPLOYEE DESIRES?
30 IS THE GOMMUNICATION FROM TO!•!Pi 2.8 2.2 .6
MANAGEMEN'T USUALLY OPEN AND
HONEST?
41 OVERALL, DOES EVERYONE FEEL 2.5 2.1 ei
FREE TO SPEAK-UP AND SAY 1•ltiAT
HE/SHE Tt1INKS?
4 DO YOU fEEI THE EMPLOYEE COST 3.5 3.2 .3
FOR MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE
IS REASONABLE? '
34 DUES TFIE TOV FILL JOBS 2.9 2.6 .3
INTERNALLY WHEN THERE ARE
QUALIFIED PEOPLE WITHIN WNO
WANT THE JOB?
35 IS MANAGEMETdT CONCERNED AROUT 2.6 2.3 .3
YOU AS AN INDIVIDUAL?
67 DO YOU fEEL FREE TO DISAGREE 2.8 2.5 .3
WITH YOUR SUPERVISOR I•JITHOUT
FEAR OF REPRISAL?
-9 -
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS CO(11)(:i1_, IfJC.
. zoaiN or vn r I.
~J [F9F'LOYEE OPINION SURVf-.Y
EXECUTIVE SUI'IP7nRY
COMPARISOtd TO FREI/IOUS SURVEY (Cont°d)
P90ST NEGATIVE FIOVEMEPlT
Quest. 1995 1992 Deviation
No. kuestion Avg. Qvg, from 1992
ZS IS THE SKI PASS BEPJEFIT .'.5 3.V .5-
VALUABlE TO YOU?
1 DOES Tt1E TOV P7AKE Aid ADEQUt1TE 2.3 2.6 , 3-
EFFORT TO TELL YOU HOW PAY IS
DETERMIIdEI)?
5 DOES YOUR SUPERIlISOR Ct1RE :.1 3.3 .2-
ABOUT YOU I1S A PERSOPd?
47 DOES YOUR SUPERVISOR LET YOU 2.9 3.1 .2-
KPlOb! EXACTI Y 6•1HAT IS EXPECTED
OF YOU?
48 bJOULD YOU ACCEPT d JOB AT 2.1 2.3, .2-
APdOTHER ORGAPdIZATIOPd DO%PIG Tt9E
SAME JQA AS YOU DO HERE, WITt9
THE SAP9E PAY, SCFiEDULE APID
BEPdEF%TS?
P10UNTAIPd STATES EPIPLOYERS COlitiCiL, IPdC. -10-
TOWN OF VAIL
• EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVEY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMPARISON TO NORMS
The norms in the survey are formed by the opinions of
S
approximately 65,000 area employees in a wide variety of
private and public enterprises. When only the standard
questions are used, the results for TOV compared to the
norms are as follow: , Co. Norm Deviation
Cateaorv Avg. AVg_ from Norm
BENEFITS 3.2 3.0 .2
HOURS AND WORKING CONDITIONS 3.2 3.1 .1
JOB SATISFACTION 2.8 2.8 ,p
MANAGEMENT 2.6 2.6 .0
SUPERVISION 3.0 3.1 .1-
PAY 2.3 2.6 .3-
-11-
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUNCIL, INC.
v •
. Tu"WN OF ~AL
Opin0~~
~~~~~~~~ons to Community Norms.
. Survey Score
4a0
3 e ~ . _
3,0 _
2o5
2a0 - -
100
Benefits Job Sat. Supv.
Hrs, & W.C. Mg4. pay
TOV ~ 3.2 3.2 2.8 2.6 3.0 2.3
CORAAAUN8TV ~ 3.0` 3.1 2.8 2.6 3.1 2.6
TOi!°a Overal8 Norm Score 2.9
Corrisnunity Overall Norm Scoce 2.9
,
N
T04JN or- vniL
FMPLOYEE OPINI0I4 SURVFY
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CUMPARISONS,TO NORPIS (Cont'd)
More specifically, the resulting scores Fliat deviated the
most from the no?•ms were:
iNOST POSITIVE MOVEMEtJT
Quest. Co. Norm Deviation
. No. Question Avg,. Ayg. from Norm
12 DO YOU FEEL TOV°S BENEFITS AP,E 3.7 _ 2.9 .3
ADEQUAIE TO MEET YOUR NEEDS?
32 ARE SUPPLIES AtJD MATERIALS 3.~i 3.1 ,3
AVAIIABLE l•lHEPJ YOU NEED TN[M?
34 DOES THE TOV FILL JOBS 7.9 T_.G .3
INTERNALLY WHEN THERE ARE
QUALIFIED PEOPLE WITHIW 41H0
I•JANT THE JOB?
44 IS YOUR JOB CHALLENGING ENOUGII 3.1 2.9 .2
TO USE YOUR FULL ABILITIES?
51 DO YOU FEEL THE OVERALL /1TTI- 2.7 2.5 .2
TUDE OF 7OV EMPLOYEES TOl•JARD
THEIR JOBS IS POSITIVE?
MOST NEGATIVE MOVEMENT
Quest. ' Co. Norm Deviation
No. Question Ava• Avg, from Norm
• 48 WOULD YOU ACCEPT A JOB AT 2.1 2.8 .7-
ANOTHER ORGANIZATION DOING THE
SAME JOB AS YOU DO HERE, 64ITN
THE SAME PAY, SCHEDULE AND
BENEFITS?
38 DOES YOUR SUPERVISOR APPLY 2.4 2.8 .4-
DZSCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
CONSISTENTLY?
1 DOES TNE TOV MAKE AN ADEQUATE 2.3 2.6 .3-
EFFORT TO TELI YOU HOW PAY IS
DETERNiI1dED?
11 IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAS OVER- 2.7 3_0 .3-
TIME, IS OVERTIME ADMINISTERED
ON A FAIR AND EQUITABLE BASIS?
14 ARE THERE OPPORTUNITIES FOR 2.3 2.6 .3--
- ADVANCEMENT FOR QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES IN THE TOV?
-13-
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUtP:Tl. IPIC.
TOWN OF VAIL
~ EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVFY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NO OPIPJION RESPOPdSES
It should be noted #hat 19.5% or more of fhe survey
participants had no opinion on the foliowing 2 multiple
choice questions:
Question Percent Co.
NO. @uestaon Pdo Opinion Av°•
11 %F YOUR DEPARTMENT HAS OVER- 21.5% 2.7
TIIWE, IS OVERTIME ADMIPdISTERED
OM A FAIR AND EQUITABLE BASIS?
54 ARE PROP90TIOPdS AT THE TOV 20.1% 2.5
GIVEid TO THE P10ST QU/lLIFIED
PEOPLE? •
WIOUPdTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUNCIL, IPdC,. -14-
M
COM1dIENT SECTTONf
The open-ended questions at the back of the questionnaire afforded employees an opportunity .
to expa.nd on previously surveyed topics or verbalize their thoughts to questions requesting an
_ essay response. Their responses provide exoellent insights and some thoughtful suggestions.
Samples of each of the open-ended questions follow.
A What I really flike about the TOV is:
"Good benefits. Great people to work with. Good work environment."
"Town's willingness to try and keep improving."
"The location - Va.il in general. The health benefits are excellent for the price I pay. NTy flexible
schedule works well." "Freedom to make decisions without having someone looking over my shoulder."
B. V6hat I really dislike about the TOV is:
"Lack of advancement opportunities. Poor communications between dept."
"Town Council is out of touch with our jobs and our workloads."
"Decisions not being made timely or improvements ta.king too long to implement."
"Low sa.laries for cost-of-living."
-15-
~ .
~~MhMN7CS SECg`gON (Continued)
C. g affiprovementts off changes would you reco dto help nmke the TOV a
betge~ ~lace to work°P
°°I think they need to look at the pay scale and cost of living in Yhe Vail Valley.°'
°''Timely decisions by Ynanagement and more delegation so decision-making can occur without
vvaiting around."
"Better interdept. communication. There is a need for more teamwork between depts."
°°Get a personnel director."
"Have employees become a part of decisions."
"°KeeP uP with 'I' Q train.ing to sta.y on target. Allow gsople to grow and change by providing
tOOIS a.IId P.dllC3t.lOII."
D. What is yoaazc ~ ~f informataon at the TOV?
The grapevine was cited most often by survey participants as best source of information.
Meetings, Vail 1Vewspaper, Newsletters and Supervisors aae the four next best sources of
information. Also mentioned several times were: Memos and the Town Manager.
E. Is ikflac Employee off the ~ear program ffiaeanangful and wo~ ~ntinuing?
~o Comments:
Fiifty-three gercent of respondents to this question do not feel the Employee of the Xear -
ProgY'amis mea.ningful and worth conti.nuing while 35 percent do and 12 percent are undecided.
"We a.Y'e working towards a tea.Yn orientation, I feel we should recognize teamwork a.nd effort,
a.nd not the individual.°"
flIt's now a popularity contest."
°'Should be a better way of electing the candidate."
°'Recognition, positive, of any kind is always worth continuing."
-16-
COMMENTS SEGTION (Conti.nued) F. In general, the environment in which I work (lighting, heating, space, cleanlimess,
etc.) is appropaiate for my position and the kind of work I do. Yes No
If no, plea.se list specific problems.
Over 60 percent of respondents to this question indicated the environment in which they work
is appropriate.
Specific problems include:
Heating ,
Ventilation
Cleanliness
Lighting
Overcrowded
No windows
G. General comments:
"For the most part, I believe the TOV is a great place to work. We need improvement in pay scales; and need the ability to add more employees to help with the workload."
"I think the Town is genuinely trying to make changes. I want it to keep going. I want the
Dept. heads to take TQM and run with it to make it work." "Keep up the i.mprovement process."
~
-17-
~
PIEMlEMBER.. .
~ Timely feedback of survey results is critical to the integrity of this proce.ss.
TVormally, the organiza.tion-wide results of the multiple choice questions are
shared with employeas, along with a°'thank-you" for their participation.
Management's evaluation, responses, and action steps should be communicated
reasonably soon thereafter to the employees.
~ Management should take any negative results in as constructive a manner as
possible. Avoiding defensiveness, blaffie placing, and "witch hunting" are most
important in achieving positive resalts from the survey.
~ Tais suavey is only a"snagshot°° of what participants thought on the day they
coffipleted Yhe survey. Opinions are dynamic and can Ue (axid are) changed.
~ Tais report does not contain all the solutions to the challenges you face. It muust
be regarded as another piece of creiitable management information Yo be used
in reaching sound decisioais. Howeaery at does quantify and document what
employees considertlaegreatest strengths a.nd shortcomings ofthe orga.nization.
~ Follow-up sugvveys are norma11y aecommended 18 to 24 months apart. This
proeades consi.stent nneasureanents fog ma.nagement on the effectiveness of their
changes. Compa.easons of yotarself, ovea- t'ime, are far more impoa-tant than
comparison to noxms.
-1~3-
WPh~..., P. O. BOX 729, GRAND JUNCTIOIN, CO 81502 (303) 244-9074
JOHIV L. CALDWELL, DiRECToR, REAL rsrqTE
September 10, 1995
TRANSnN@TTED V9~ FAX TO (970) 479-2452°
Tom Nloorehead, Esq.
. Andy Knudtsen
Touvn of Vail 75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Remaining Vail Commons negotiations matters
Dear Tom and Andy:
We are very encouraged by the progress made in the last two uveeks in the
negotiations for the land lease for the Vail Commons project. From Tom's voice mail
message and a telephone conference with Andy last vveek, vve understand the
remaining unresolved items are, and our input is, as fo!lows:
1. DUE DATES FOR REIVTAL PAYMEiVTS. Our original proposal was for
annual payments, in arrears. Council suggested quarterly payments, in advance. We
proposed instead quarterly, in arrears. We were surprised when Council rejected that
compromise, since it reflected a signifcant move from our original proposal, and since
Council's proposal, for three months in advance at a time, is especially aggressive.
We suspect that Council is looking at this issue as perhaps a matter of principal,
whereas for us the timing of cash flows is integral to the perFormance of the internal rate
of return model which we used to build the proposal. Advancing the timing of any
payments causes that financial model to deteriorate. In this particular issue, every
payment for the 49 year term of the lease is being advanced in time. Thus, there is a
dollar cost to us in this change which may not initially be apparent to Council.
Again as a compromise, we now propose monfhly payments in advance. We
trust that, when weighing the sum of the concessions v?re've made in these negotiations,
Council will keep in mind that this one also reduces our return on the project.
~
~
\'J2. INCREASES IN BASE RENTALS OVER TIME. This is, for City Market,
one of the two very serious issues remaining in these negotiations. We suspect that it
remains unresolved because Counci) perhaps believes that the rents, over time, will.
become a bargain for City Market as inflation reduces the value of the dollar. We
concur that this is likely. However, we also suggest that this is appropriate, when
considered as part of the entire package.
The original RFP concept was that this project is much more than a land lease.
Significant financial burdens for the developer were designed into that RFP, including
the affordable housing, the day care or community center facility, the requirement that
the store be disguised, the need for the parking structure, significant frontage road and
other off-site improvements and the requirement that the developer manage to finance
the project without ownership of the underlying ground. All of these represent
additional costs which must somehow be recovered if the project is to be successful,
and all are fixed, front-end costs to be incurred at the start of the project. Finally, it was-
our understanding that these features of the project were non-negotiable, and that the
underlying rental rate should reflect this situation. By definition, then, this project wouid
not create market rate land rental revenues for the Town of Vail. The City Market proposal involves the largest total project investment (more than
double what we spent for our new 53,000 sq. ft. store in the Roaring Fork Valley), and
the highest annual rents. Together, these two characteristics of our proposal represent
more financial risk than proposed by any other developer. In addition, we agreed that,
if the sales vo4ume justified it, we would pay additional rents as a percentage of sales
override. No other developer offered such potential for additional future rents. Thus,
we made an aggressive offer that contains no relief for City Market if the market stays
flat or weakens, and yet provides increased rentals for the Town if the market grows
over time.
We've recently heard suggestions that the percentage override offered was too
"risky" for the Town, since safes growth may not occur, and override payments may not
result. Such sentiment ignores the huge front-end investment in this project, which
must be recovered by any developer. If the sales growth does not occur, the Town still .
received the housing, the parking structure, the road improvements, the disguised store
(with its sales tax benefits) and still retains ownership of the property. The fixed rental
structure in such a low-sales growth environment is then critical to the economic
viability of the developer.
In summary, then, the "risk" here is not that the Town may not receive value for
use of the land. It already gets that value in the design and cost of the project, in the
added sales tax revenues and in the highest rental proposal from any developer. The
true "risk" here is that, by adding another financial burden in the form of fixed rental
increases, the project may at some future point become economically unstable. After
committing to the fixed investment required by this project, City Market is very reluctant
to add such additional risk (as would be any of the other developers, none of whom
even came to the table with our amount of investment or rents).
d
0
~
3. "GO-DARK" PROVISION. This is the second very serious issue
remaining for City fViarket. We understand that Council is sensitive to fihe political
ramifications of a project which may "go darbc" at some future date, and that Cou.ncil
desires the ability to promptly deal vvith that eventuality. However, there are very va(id
economic reasons why this issue should be resolved with some compromise.
We have heard comments that it is a default in many leases when the tenant
stops operafing in the premises, and this is correct. However, those are invariably
leases where the landlord ov?rns both fihe land and the improvements. "Go dark"
provisions are absolutely unheard of in land leases. The reason for fihis is simple.
Lenders are unders4andably wary of, any provision which mighf result in loss of their
collateral. Thus, a"go dark" provision is a direct 4hreat to any financing effort.
Consider the ramifications of a"go dark" provision to a lender. If the operations
cease, the lender must not only begin foreclosure to take ownership of the premises, it
must also find another operator to get the facility reopened. Until the foreclosure is
finished, the lender cannot take possession, and thus has no right to install any
replacement operator. When a"go dark" provision exists, and vvhen the time period for
cure is anything less than a year, the lender will simply not have sufficient time to make
this happen, even af a replacement operator can be found.
Recognizing this, City iVlarket at first intended that the lease uvould have no "go
dark" provision at all. Subsequent consideration of the political issues in the Town
convinced us that we needed to make some provision for this remote possibility. Thus,
we included the provision that a closure of 365 days constituted default, even though it
added substantial new difficulty in arranging financing for the project. In other words,
including this provision in fhe lease at all was a major concession by City Market.
Council's suggestion that the 365 day "dark" period be reduced to 90 days would
make frnancing the project an impossibility. No lender would accept such a short fuse
on his opportuni4y to protect its collateral.
When it became apparent to us that fihis was a significant issue to Council, City
Market offered to shorten the "go dark" period in the early years of the lease term,
recognizing that this might mean we could not finance the project at all until the early
years of the lease term had passed. We believe that no developer could offer more in
this circumstance, and vve again request that Council reconsider our last proposal on
this matter.
4. ELIGIBILITY OF CITY fVIARKET EiVIPLOYEES TO PURCHASE
HOUSING. We accept Council's argument that City Market employees will
automatically be in the highest priority pool for eligibility, due to their status as
employees in Vail, and we hereby remove the request for special consideration for
these employees.
e
?
~
5. RENTAL FOR THE DAYCARE FACILITY. Our proposal has always been
that a modest amount of rental would be charged for the day care facility. This was not
an attempt to generate profits for the project, but instead a design to recover the
ongoing real property tax, insurance and maintenance costs of operating the facility,
and over time, the investment. It was new information to us last week to learn that the
Town owns and leases other day care facilities for only nominal rents.
We do not believe that the Town's plan here is to unduly enrich day care
operators. We suspect that the low rentals charged to other operators, and requested
by the Town for this project, simply reflect the Town's desire to create day care for
residents at modest cost, and we intend to participate in achieving that goal. However,
we also suspect that none of the Town's nominal rent arrangements has a 49 year
term, and that the Town might agree with us that over time, day care could become an
economically viable business. Accordingly, we propose the following:
A. For the first 5 years of the lease term, the day care rentals shall not
exceed the taxes, insurance and maintenance costs incurred by the owners.
B. At the end of that 5 year term, if the Town is still committed to providing
long term space to other day care operations at nominal cost, and if by virtue of
waiting lists it is apparent that a day care need still exists, the rents for this
day care facility will again be set at the amount described in A above for the next
five years. This process will be repeated every five years thereafter.
C. Even if, at the end of any five year period, the Town and the owners agree
that sufficient day care space is then available, or that day care is then
economically viable as a stand-alone business, the owners will never charge
rentals for this space in excess of 50% of the rents then charged for the other
non-residential space being rented to third parties in the project.
D. At any time after the first ten years of the lease term, the owners would
alternatively have the option of operating the licensed day care operation in this
facility themselves.
6. DEED RESTRICTIONS FOR THE 18 CITY MARKET EMPLOYEE
HOUSING RENTAL UNITS. We have consistently agreed that these units shall be
deed restricted. Perhaps because of our unfamiliarity with other deed restriction
arrangements in the area, we were unaware of the precise terms of such restrictions;
specifically, that they included a formula for calculating maximum rentals, etc. We
hereby request a complete package of that data for review.
Many of our employees work less than 40 hours per week. We are especially
interested in the definition of "full-time" emplo.yees. We also observe that, by including
utilities in our rentals and by providing some units furnished, we may have different circumstances than do existing units so restricted. We will do this review quickly after
receiving the materials.
e
9
b+ -
1Ne look fonnrard to discussing these issues with you both, and Susan and Bob
on Nionday morning.
Very firuly yours,
John L. Caldwell
cc: Vail town negotiations file
Tony Prinster
Bob VVarner .
Greg Hoskin -
PLANNaNG AND ENviRONMEni~AL CoMnnassiON
September 11, 1995
AGEiVDA
12rojec4 Orienta4ion / Lunch 12.30p.m
Discussion of Community Development reorganization - Susan Connelly
Public Hearing 2:00 p.en.
1. A 6equest for a worksession to discuss a proposed amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the
Vail Municipal Code ( Ski Base Recreation) and an amendment to the previously
approved development plan to allow for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base,
located at 485 Vail Valley Drive / Tract F, Vail Vitlage 5th filing and Tract B, Vail Village
7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates Inc., represented by David Corbin
Planner: Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton
2. Ara appeal of an adminisYrative decision by the Zoning Administration to deny issuance of
a building permit, located at 5040 Main Gore Place #A3/Sundial Townhomes (Phase II).
Applicant: Jeffery Schillman
Planner: Randy Stouder
3. A request for a Major SDD Amendment to SDD .#31, the Golden Peak House, to allow for
a rnodification to the approved density, located at 278 Hansen Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E.
Applicant: GPH Partners, Ltd.
Rtanner: Mike Mollica
4. A Fequest for a worksession to discuss the Eagle River Watershed plan.
PEanner: Russell Forrest .
5. A request for a rezoning of various properties throughout Town, (as described on the
attached Exhibit A), from their current zoning designation to the IVatural Area
Preservation District (iVAPD), General Use (GU), or Outdoor Recreation (OR) Zone
Districts.
Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Jim Curnutte & Russ Forrest
TALBLED UR9T9L SEPTEAABER 25,1995
6. Approval of August 14, 1995 PEC minutes.
7. Approval of August 28, 1995 PEC minutes.
F:\everyonelpe&1agendas\091195 ~
r
4
DESIGN REV0EW BOARD AGENDA
September 6, 9996
3:00 P.M.
PRO.9ECT ORBENTAT80N 10:30
SITE VOSOTS 12.00
1. Falls at Vail Condo. - 3950 iVorth Frontage Road
2. Sim - 3916 Lupine Drive 3. Coggin - 4207 Columbine Drive / Bighorn Condominiums
4. Lauterbach - 4335 Spruce Way
5. Faessler - 501 fVorth Frontage Road West
6. Indian Creek #1 - 1139 Sandstone Drive
7. Roost - 1783 North Frontage Road
8. Vail Commons - 2099 North Frontage Road UVest
9. Gund - Sierra Trail
10. Kehrman - 12 Vail Road
11. Dews.- 278 Rockledge Road
12. Cook - 1012 Eagle's Nest Circle
13. Vail Rec District/Golf Course Maintenance Facility - 278 Vail Valley Drive
Driver: George '
1. Vail Commons - Development Proposal. AK
2099 N. Frontage Road UVest/located on an unplatted parcel, Vail Commons
Applicant: City Market represented by Victor Mark Donaldson, ,4rchitects
MOTION: SECOiVD: VOTE:
CONCEPTUAL REVVE@N - NO !lOTE
2. Spraddle Creek Estates - Public Information Sign (revised version) RS
1253 Spraddle Creek. Drive/Spraddle Creek Subdivision
Applicant: Charlie Biederman
MOTION: Borne SECOiVD: Armour VOTE: 5-0
TABLED UNTBL SEPTEMBER 20; 1995
3. Faessler - Construction of cellular phone site and antennas. FtS
501 fVorth Frontage Road V1/esdPart of Lot 8, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch
Applicant: Larry Storms of SASI representing Faessler. Realty Company
MOTION: Borne SECOND: Armour VOTE: 5-0
APPRONED @N/~OND8TIONS
4. Liftside Condominiums - Sign application. GR/CS
1275 VUesthaven Drive/Liftside Condominiums.
Applicant: Larry Ast, High Tech Signs
MOTIOiV: Alm SECOfVD: Armour VOTE: 5-0
APPRObED
F:\everyone\drb\agendas\090695
5. Houtsma - Approval of color scheme for residence. GR
1868 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 47, Vail Village 1 st
Applicant: Bobbi Ann Houtsma
MOTION: Armour SECOND: Arnett VOTE: 5-0
TABLED UPOTIL SEPTEIUIBER 20, 1995
^ 6. Kehrman - Minor Amendment to SDD - Gateway Plaza, Unit 5. GR
12 Vail Road, Unit #5/Gateway Plaza Building.
Applicant: Steve Riden for Karl Kehrman
MOTION: Alm SECOfVD: Armour VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED W/CONDITIONS
7. Roost - Reroof with new metal roof. GR
1783 North Frontage Road/Lots 10,11,12, Buffher Creek Subdivision
Applicant: John Hazen
MOTION: Armour SECOND: Arnett VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED W/CONDITIONS
8. Sim - New single family residence. GR
3916 Lupine Drive/Lot 58, Block 2, Bighorn 1 st Addition.
Applicant: Dalton Sim represented by Bob Borne
MOTiON: Alm SECOND: Arnett VOTE: 4-0-1
(Borne abstained)
APPROVED W/CONDITIONS
9. Cook - Conceptual review of 250 GRFA for Primary and Secondary Residences GR
1012 Eagles Nest Circle/Lot 2, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Fritzlen Pierce Briner representing Sam B. Cook
MOTIOIV: SECOND: VOTE:
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW - NO VOTE
10. Indian Creek #1 - Changes to previously approved plans. JC
1139 Sandstone Drive, Unit #1/Indian Creek Townhomes.
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
MOTION: Armour SECOND: Arnett VOTE: 5-0
TABLED UNTIL SEPTENJBER 20,1995 _
11. Vail Recreation District - Redevelopment of Golf Course Maintenance Facility. RF
278 Vail Valley Drive, Golfcourse Maintenance Building/Parcel E, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Town of Vail
MOTION: Arnett SECOND: Woldrich VOTE: 5-0
r
APPROVED WICONDITIONS
12. Dews - Demo/Rebuild of a Primary/Secondary residence using two 250 sq. ft. GRFA LW
allotments. 278 Rockledge Road/Lot 15, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing
Applicant: Julie Dews
MOTION: Arnett SECOND: Armour VOTE: 5-0
DENIED
F:\everyone\drb\agendas\090695 2
r'
~
13. West Vail Mall - Amendment to the sign program. Lyy
2161 N. Frontage Rd. WesULot 2, Vail Das Schone Filing #3
Applicant: VVest Vail Mall Corps represented by Larry Ast
iVlOTION: ,4rmour SECOND: Arnett VOTE: 5-0
DEP6BED 14. Falls at Vail - Replacement of timber crib retaining walls. GR
3950 North Frontage Road North/Falls at Vail Condominiums
Applicant: Jim Poppleton
MOTIOfV: Alm SECOIVD: Armour VOTE: 5-0
APPRO!!ED WXONDrrmS
15. Gund - Newr Primary/Secondary residence. RS
Sierra Trail/Lot 18, Block 1, Vail Village VVest 1 st Filing
Applicant: Ed Gund
MOTIOIV: SECOfVD: VOTE:
TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 20, 1995
16. Lauterbach - New single family residence. JC
4335 Spruce UVay/Lot 4, Block 3, Bighorri Subdivision Third Addition.
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
MOTIOfV: SECOfVD: VOTE:
TABLED fl9N'6'IL S~~EMBER 20, 1995
17. Town of Vail - Addition to Public VUorks Administration Building and AK
renovation of Bus Barn. 1309 Vail Valley Drive/Unplatted Parcel
Applicant: Town of Vail Public Works Department
MOTIOIV: SECOiVD: VOTE:
T~~~~D UftT6~ ~EPTENIBER 209 1995
MEMBERS PRESENT fVIENIBERS ABSEiVT
Mike Arnett
Bob Borne Brent Alm
Hans VVoldrich
Bob Armour
Staff Ap r vals
Ryan - Portable Hot Tub. Lyy
1310 VUesthaven Drive, CiVIC Building, Cascade Village •
Applicant: Richard Ryan
Hobbit Hill/Milloy, Sutherd, Rx Ski Corp. and Ryan - Roof line extension over entrywrays. LW
1546 Matterhorn Circle, Hobbit Hill
Applicant: Stephen Smith representing Milloy, Sutherd, Rx Ski Corp. and Ryan n
F:\everyone\drb\agendas\090695 3
~
Levy - Minor alteration to approved plans GR
4819 Meadow Drive/Lot 18, Block 5, Bighorn 5th
Applicant: Ed and Joanne Levy
Steadman Residence - Realign driveway. AK
1253 Spraddle Creek Road/Lot 11, Spraddle Creek
Applicant: Dr. Richard and Gay Steadman
Trotta - Deck and handrail addition. GR
1568 Golf TerraceNail Golfcourse Townhomes, Sunburst Filing #3
Applicant: Bill Trotta
Gibson - Repaint. GR
1855 West Gore Creek/Lot 22, Vail Village West #2
Applicant: William Gibson
Jackle - Landscaping GR
1672 Matterhorn Circle/Lot 21/23, Matterhorn Filing #1
Applicant: Sally A. Jackle ~
Gray Armstrong Duplex - Window Additions JC
2672 Kinnickinnick/Lot 2, Block 2, Gore Creek Subdivision
Applicant: Harry Gray and Tom Armstrong
Vail Valley Consolidated Water District - Piping of new well, updating of elec. and LW
telemetering system.
Vail Golf Course Pumphouse Building
Applicant: Gail Lucas for Vail Valley Consolidated Water District
Scott, Hayden - Excavation of crawl space. LW
1350 Sandstone Drive, Unit #1 /Lot G3, Eiger Chalets, Lionsridge # 4
Applicant: Hayden Scott
Treetops Condos - New exterior doors. LW
450 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st
' Applicant: Treetops Condo Association
Ying P/S - Skylight addition. . JC
486 Forest Road/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 6th
Applicant: Chartes Ying
Bannister - Change to approved plans. LW
2943 Bellflower/Lot 4, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Jack Snow, RKD for Frank Bannister
Base Mountain Sports - Sign application. LW
610 Lionshead Place/Landmark Building.
Applicant: Larry Ast, High Tech Signs
Koenig Residence - Change to appr`oved plans. GR .
795 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 26, Potato Patch
Applicant: Gary Koenig
F:\everyone\drb\agendas\090695 4
a
Steadman = Change to site walls. ,qK
1253 Spraddle Creek Road/Lot 11, Spraddle Creek Estates
Applicant: Dr. Steadman
P?ndretta - Skylight addition Lyy
3891 Bighorn Road/The Ledges, Unit B
Applicant: Nirs. Andretta .
Boniface - Landscape Renovation GR
2038 SunbursULot 17, Vail Valley 3rd .
Applicant: Bernie Boniface
Alpine Standard - Satellite Dish • AK
28 S. Frontage Rd./Lot A, Vail Village 2nd
Applicant: Doug Sterkel
Bass - Trim Repaint. LW
345 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 14, Block 1, Vail Village 1st
Applicant: Lee Bass
Prussian & Santull - Entry remodel LW
556 Forest Rd./Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Village 6th
,4pplicant: George Prussian & Richard Santull
Miller Residence -.Change from previously approved plan JC
1477 Aspen Grove Lane/Lat 3, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing 4
Applicant: VNill fVliller
Evergreen Lodge - iVevu 18" satellite dish. - JC
250 S. Frontage Rd. V1/esULot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd
Applicant: Pam Stenmark
Cook - Entryway enclosure. RS
5037B Niain Gore Place, VVest UniULot 1, Sundial Subdivision
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach for Laura Cook
Vail Mountain School - Site plan revision. RS
3160 Katsos Ranch RoadNail Mountain School.
Applicant: Pam Hopkins for Vail Mountain School
Lancaster - Repaint of exterior of building. RS
5047 Ute Lane/Lot 33, Vail AAeadows Filing #1.
Applicant: John Lancaster
Park Meadows - Renovation of front entryuvay. RS
1472 Matterhorn Circle/Park Meadows Condominiums.
Applicant: Farrow Hitt for Park Meadows Condominiums
Friztlen/Fallridge - Office exterior alteration. L1N/CS
1650 East Vail Valley Drive, Unit C-1/Fallridge Condominiums/Lot 2, Sunburst Filing #3.
Applicant: Lynn Fritzlen
F:\everyoneklrb\agendas\090695 5
Y
I
Poole - Window Addition. CS
2039 Chamonix Lane/Lot 17, Vail Heights
Applicant: James and Sandi Poole
Redpath - Driveway Reconstruction. GR
. 2692 Cortina Lane/Lot 10, Block B, Vail Ridge
Applicant: Bob Redpath
Base Mountain Sports - Window Signs. LW
610 South Frontage Road/Landmark Building
Applicant: Larry Ast - High Tech Signs Aldrete - Remodel. RS
1784 Matterhorn Circle/Lot 3, Vail Village West 2nd
Applicant: Val Aldrete
Bailey - Site Improvements. RS
1287 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 2, Block 3, Vail Valley 1 st
Applicant: Gary Bailey
Fargo Residence - Interior 250. . GR
1645 Golf Terrace/Golfcourse Townhomes
Applicant: Fargo Energy Corp. Krogmann Residence - Alteration on approved plan. . RS
2575 Davos /Lot 1, Block F, Vail Ridge
Applicant: Pvlonica and Juergen Krogman Mancuso - Decks. . CS
1761 Alpine Drive #1/Lot 32, Vail Village West 1st
Applicant: Jennifer Mancuso
F:leveryone\drb\agendas\090695 6
. '
~o
~ ,pF~i~ u,.~~~. ,e ~.t:i i i,~ ~ ~.yn11 i • , , , .;a•;~„RS., :r i t
( lffir.r c~f th~~ 14c,:url c>f (_:~nnniissi~,iicn l",aglc C:uunty 13uildink
({1%(l) 31R-FiGli.S PO. Rox 950
I ;ax: (970) 31.8-7207 . `r, . 50xy Broadway
II)I): (9711) 3211-8797 . ~ Ltgli:, C.tduiqdn RI(i3l-0$tip
Sept@mber 1, 1995 - 16:07
~GLE CO X, COI.ORADO
" - .
AGENDA
Es' , 0 A ~ ~ ~~~TY" COMMISS«N~~~
~~GULAR MEETING DAY
SE0 TEtltl0B~
ER u 1p 1995 . . 4 .
O C O O 4 fS ttr 4 4 Q d{} * C p Q Q{t A R p A O O C O 4 O 6 A 4 O 4 O A t1 4 4 .
8o30 - 10.00 CtlP7~RK o7ES07'Of! - PGNDIAVG I..tlT'VP49lO9tl
James R. Fritze, Coun4y Attorraey
il 0:o0 - 9 0o15 Bi2EAK
10095 - 99:IS WORK SESSIOfV - VVEE!(LY UPDATE
1116 - 12a00 WORK sEsS'ON - M~~~~~~ ATTENDED
12o00 - ~20 LUNcH
1e30 = 1a45 (~ONSENT CALERIDAR
Items of a routlne end nomcontrovarsial natum are Plsrod on the consonP calendarto allow 1he Board of Couny Cooanlss~ners 4o spand I1~ tim.
and energq om marm IwnporImnt ilema an a Ionglfig agonda. Any Commissioner mey raqueat that an Qem be'REMOyEp° 9foM U1o Cotlsoni cmlondui
en8 oDnaldered seperalely. Anp merrtbar o( the pybliC may °REQUE57° ahy Ilbm be 'REMOVED' fram 1Pee Coneenl Agende.
Ile BIVLIL Pf"6UING " . i .,...:,t..r : r:,.; Linda Pankuch, Accounting
Mark Silverthorn, Controller
ACTdONo Approval subjec4 4o review by the Chairman. .
a. PAYROLL FOR SEPTEAflBER 14, 1995
Mark Silverthorn, Controller
AC78ONo Approval subject to review by the Chairman
. . . . . . i . .
3e STdll 11 E U tltlOJHOQAY ~CCESS tlERM'T
George Roussos, Gounty Engineer
ACT@ONo Consider approvaI.
4. . b`9GREEIYAENT BE tl tlYEF-N EA67bG WOV W NTY9 S0 dr'9 EE OF
COLORAD0, ST'14G GIJLCH PARTNERS AND MC JOINT
. VENTl1RE REGARDIIVG COLLA1°Et7AL FOR BEARCAT AT
• THE RAiVCH AT CORD9LLERA, PF{A5E 11, CORDILLE
a7UBDltl'o7IOltly F18_AAYG 13 •
6Cathy Eastley, Planning Departmen4 ACTION: Consider approval. .
5. RESOLUTBON UFTIlVG THE B111l.L11NG lUIORATQ121lJAA OIV
ALL dOTS WITHIIV EB1( CFtEEK MESl4 Sl1BD11lISlON,. . . .
James Fritze, County Attorney W~~~ONa Consider approval_
S. LEASE AGREENIEIVT BE7V!?EEN EAGLE COUNfiYe STATE
• OF COLOFtr4DQ AND HERTZ CAR ' RENTAL' ' FOft . . , . . OVERFLQW PAFtKING AT THE EAGLE COU1VTY
REQ390NAL AtRPORT
• Dan Reyeaolds, Airport ManageP ACTION: Consider approval.
7. OMPROVEMEtdT PROJECT GRANT' AGREEIVlENT '
EXECUTIOIV FOR EAGLE COIJMTY REG9ONA! AIRPO13T
Dan Reynolds, Asrporf Manager
ACTION: Consider approval. 1:45 ° 2:00 Q. WTEi24yOVEftNMENTAL AGREEMEfVT BETIA?EER! E4(;1.E
COUNTYD STATE OF COLORAbQ AND THE TO1NA! OF
. SALT FOHt OFFICE SPACE iN THE AL7' AAIINlCIPAL
I~~ILDiNG
Mike Bradley, Building and Grounds Manager
. ACTION: Consider approval.
E ~OUNTY AMBIILANCE PERMST
Nursing Departmen4
ACTION: Cansider approda0. . ' . C. ~~~~LUTIO N AUTFIORBZIIVG DRAiNING OF C4LLJ4TER4~
~N LETTER OF CREDaT FOR INEfVD COLOfZA~~
~ARTNERSH[P (EL JEB~~ ~EXAcO)
James Fritze, Coun4y Attorney ,
ACT9ONo Consider approval . . . .
~ •
D. RESOL9AT90N AND POWER QFATTORIVEYAIJTHORIZING
DRAINING OF COLLATEite4L ON CERTIFICATE OF
DEPOSIT FOR Si1MMIT VIEW
James Frifze,. County Attamey .
. ACTIONo Consider approval. .
E_ COLORA130 DISCRETIONARY AVIAT101~ ~RANT
PROGiZJ4M APPLICANT NOTICE s41VD CO11AAAITIIAENT
Dan Reynolds, Airpost Manager ACT~ON: Consider approvai.
. F. A9RPORT S[GIV PQUCY STATEMEIVT REV@E1h!
Dan Reynolds, r4irport
ACTeONa Consider approva9. . .
2:00 - 2a30 WORK SESSION - F-AGLE COl9NTY REG60NAL AiRPOFtT
FAX~D 13ASE OPEitATIOAR$
Jarnes Fritze, County Aftomey
210 - S_30 WOR1C SESSION 4 F@REFeGHTIfVG ANNIIAL REPORT . .
Dave Vroman, C;ypsurri Voluntesr Firibepartnient`
3:30 - 3A5 BREAK .
3:45 - WORIC SESSBON - LAIVDFiLL UPDATE
, Don Fessler, Road & Bridge Direckor
Ron Rasnic, Solid Wasfe Coordinator -4:45. - SMS WOEtK SESSION - GHENT SiTE PLAN APPROVAL FC)FZ
OPT6QN PROPERTY
Dan Reynolds, Airport Nlanager ,
THE PlEx7 MEETIPoO OF YHE EAGLE COUNTY CORAMISSIONERS bUILL 9E 1iELD ON SEPTEdA9Ef@ 12, 9995
ALL dwEE71Na5 VWLL BE HELD IN 7FIE EAC3LE GOUPITV 6UILDING - 500 BROApyyAY, EAOLE- QR OTHEFIwISE M07Ep,
YFIIS AGEPIDA 15 pROVIDED FaR INFQqMAqIpyqL pURPOSE3 OId4Y • ALl YIAAES ARE APPROXIWIA7E,
71iE BOARD M16E IPd SESSlo1y BHAY CONSIDER 07NFR I7ERAS THAB AFtE BROUGHT BEFCRE fT.
l)(I,ix• 1.3( t1,(l Bt),nxl c,f Cumnussioncrx l:n;;lC (:0mnty Building
(970) 37.8-R605 I:O. 93c)x 9.50
Fax: (970) 328-7207 ~ . Slif1 firoadway
-rr)r): (970) 32H ,irvi i_;,g<<:, c_44ol;,du 8 1631-035()
- - .
September 1, 1996 - 9 6: 9 - -r . ' .
EAGLE CO Y, COLORADO
AGE f V DA
BOARD O'U""F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGULCR M~~~~ NG DAY .y.l '9~Di .V Ihi,rdpP1 n„n:+.,,en ~ xiai alir..••,,,,i.v..,. f1M nn.l n":a: itn: •I,
SEPTEMBER 129 1995 . .
. affooirAdrAttAUaaao auoo aa a aocaaa aocsQOaooao
9.00 _ 11o00 I~GUQR LICENSE HEARiNGS
Da MODIFICATiON 0F PREMISES - BEAVER CREEK FOOD
SER1lICES,.IIVC. dba BEANQ'S CABIN
llfla 9tEP9E11VAL - RESORT RESTAURANT AAAR9AGEAAENT LQ.C
dba BEAVER TRP1P TFiVERfV
D1fla RENEIAFAL - LAKE CREEK LIQUORS, INC. dba SOl1TH
FORTYY LIQUORS
W. NEW = J6M D. SIMIVIONS, THEODORE R. SHIPIVlAN, IPVC.
dba EL JEBEL COIV!lEIVIEIVCE STORE
11e00 - ft15 BREAK
. , ,
tq Als ° 12000 q!! ppdr@IIL p O6Vp~Sfr'~oTIO~D itl
pg~~1o .
lEogi8 C.Difllty J11dlCB C.oPllef
.~9~3g~pR p p~{~~~op~ I... I. .I 2 . i~ v b:r t~ ~t~.ud971 ~ ~_d96Y b~6d0~iJY-II
, 6:30 9-30 PO-138-95-SI ADAM'S RIB GOLF COURSE P11BBJC
HEARSNC9
7riE wEcT M~ETINo oR niE EaoLE couraTV coeWigSIpNERS WILL BE HELO ON 3EPTEMBER 98,1995
AL.fl. RflEE7ItdG.9 Ml.L BE HELD (R1 THE E11OLE CGUfdTY BUILDING - 500 BROADWAY, EAGLE- OR O7?1ERIMSE NO'iE9.
rrais aGENOn Is PrzrnnoEn Fpra WFOraPnanoMqL pURAOSES ONLY • ALL 71MES ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE 80AR0 U1/H16E Iid SESS101d AAflY COPdSIDER OTFiER ITENAS TMAT ARE BROUC3HT BEFORE fT.
~~~ENE 0 SEP C:IT'y
SEPTEMBER 1995
.
k"...,u E
N'v
-":CTIONS
~ 'Ouar
. .O. City . County o vemmental •
uto dealers y CIaIm SaIeS New Tax Information
taX Cred ItS Available
____010N6
Motor vehicle dealers who directly finance sales of motor vehicles for their customers
now may take bad debt deductions whenpurchasers default on loans that included the sales The following publicaaons may be obtained
±3,8 duP nn Y}1P. CalP TFIP tar Ir±uct hav? 31readv heQn remittQd iin. filll tn thQ ctatP. Vben in person or by mail from the State Forms
the purchaser defaults on the payments to the seller, the seller may deduct from the next Cencer, 4200 Garfield St., Denver, CO 80216-
sales tax return that portion of the sales tax that has not been collected. House Bi1195- 6517. No telephone orders are accepted, but
1279 treats seller-financed sales of motor vehicles the same as seller-financed sales of You may call (303) 3214164 to verify prices.
A$2.50 shipping chazge plus applicable sales
other tangible personal property. taz must accompany each order. Make checks
If the amount to be deducted exceeds the amount of sales tax to be remitted by the seller payable to the State Forms Center.
for the tax period> the seller may carry forwazd the remairung amount of the deduction to • ColoradoBusinessTaxStatutesa,ulReg-
future sales tax returns. The deduction is reported on Line ZB on the "Colorado Combined ulations, ,Ian.1,1995. New publicarion cov-
Retail Sales Tax Return" (DR 0100). ering all sales, fuel and ezcise tax. Text and
;v:.::<.;::.;:.;.:;.;::<.;:::;::::
'
index of statutes
and re ulations included.
t~,~.:0„~.:9.:l.:1?.:.~::!?.:~.:i.:~!::•:.+.~~.:?.,-Y;~.:.~::.:: ~.:1.:r.,::~::~D.;f.:Y::+::4::#.:4.:1!:1?.,1.:~;;4.,A.:~!:.0::+g
o Revised annually. Replaces previous sales,
fuel and ezcise tax regulations books and sup-
e i e I e s wg% n in a raff I e plements. Price: $15 plus shipping charge.
a
;A Commodity number 615-82-614121. Also
?::n Under most circumstances a vehicle sates tax on the price of the vehicle and available on diskette; price $3.50. Commodity
awarded in a raffle will be taxable. takes title in its name, the sponsor can give number 205-71-61-2959.
:;o The Departrnent of Revenue will ac- the vehicle as a tax free gift to the recipient. Revised copies for 1996 will be available in
!;n cept private appraisal, a Federal 1099 If raffle or contest rules state that sales January 1996.
form, or a blue book price to establish tax is the responsibility of the winner, that • Colorado Income Tax Statutes and Reg-
ulalzoRS, Jan. I, I995. New publication cov-
<o the value. Tax is then computed on that person must pay the tax.
ering income and withholding tax. Text and
.n value. To register and license the vehicle in index of statutes and regulations included.
?:a Sales tax must be paid by either a Colorado, the winner must pay the sales Revised annually. Replaces previous income
donating dealer, the sponsor of the event tax or prove payment by others. Colorado and withholding tax regulations books and
'o nr rhr w;rnPr nf rhe vehicle_ statntes nrohihit issuing the license if the supplements. Price: $12.50 plus S~11pp111Q
If the vehicle is won from a motor tax due on the value of the vehicle has not chazge. Commodity number 615-82-60-6200.
vehicledealer,thedealermustpay sales/ been paid. Also available on diskette; price $3.50. Com-
:?o use tax and take tide in its own name. Colorado requires that the sales tax be modity number 205-71-60-1952.
The dealer then can ive the vehicle to Revised copies for 1996 will be available in
S paid only once per transaction, and that ary
: a the recipient with no tax due. transacrion is usually the acquisition of the • UBusines Made Easier-- Preparing Your
If the sponsor of the raffle pays the car by the sponsor of the raffle. Sales Tax Return. 24-minute videotaPe Pro-
:::a:.:;.;:.;:.;:.:;.:;;.;:;.;:.;;:<.>:.:<.:;:;::::;;>:.;:>:.;::.;:.;:.:<.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.>:.;:.;:.;:.:.::;;:.>
;ov::m::..:o.:~.:s::q::a.:~e.:.::•:•::..;r.:o.:o„o.:e.:~.:o.:v.:v;:~;:~;..:.s::e'e_sse.i::s.s:.s::_ v'd' . .
............:..........::........:.......:..........:...::........:...::.::.;:a i mg complete mstructions on prepanng a
Colorado Combined Retail Sales Tax Return
(DR0100); price $7.50. Commodity number
City & County Tax EFT" Transrnissson Due Dates I 205-81-64-9412.
City & Counry Connedions is pub/rshed quartedy
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) of taxes to local govemments will occur on end mai{ed to city and cnunty governmental oHidels.
''aaesday, S0ptember 12: WedIIeSda()etober 11> • and ''l~ursda NOVCR1UeY 9. Questions end commenfs ars welcome and should be
y> sentto: City&County Connectans, CobradoDepsrtment
More than 1601ocal jurisdictions receive tax payments from the state via EFT e~ach ol Revenue, Room 262, 1375Shenrmn St.,
month. If your office is receiving payments by mail you may want to change to the Denver, CO. 80261.
EFT method for faster payment. Contact Corky I.opez, '1'axpayer Service, (303) ExeautiveEditor, DorothyDa/quist
Editar, Terri Livingston
866-4359 for more inforn?ation.
SALES TAX: HB 1028 - Machinery purchases eligible for
> sales and use tax exemption. Eliminates the
requirement that a purchase of machinery,
machine tools, or pazts be made by a person
engaged in manufacturing and used by the
Legoislati(Dn samepersoninmanufacturingtangibleperson-
.
al property to qualify for the sales and use tax
. exemption. 04/07/95
` SB 221 - Property tax, sales/use tax, business
Following' is a list of some of the new laws exemptions, credits and refunds. Changes the
enacted by the General Assembly during its substitute plate with the same numbers and criteria for qualifying for the incentive pay-
1995 regular session that pertain to the De- letters that appeared on the plate to be re- ment or credit based on the taxpayer's property
partmentofRevenue. Bffective dates are listed placed. If an identical license plate is request- and sales tax levies to include a taxpayer's
after each swrwnary. ed but the original plate is not surrendered to establishment or expansion of a bosiness facil-
1DIOTOR VEHICLE: the department, there will be a 12-month wait- ity within an enterprise zone. Adds steam to the
HB 1003 - Unlawful sales of motor vehicle ing period for reissue of the identical plate. indusmial fuels that aze exempt from the sales
registration materials. Clarif'ies that it is un- 07/01/95 and use tax law. 05/31/95
lawful for anyone to offer for sale any certifi- SB 1- Vehicle registration fees for trucks and F UEL TAX:
cate of title, validation tab or sricker, or regis- h'uck tractors. Modifies the vehicle registra- Hg 1154 - Gasoline tax. Liability for payment
tration number nlate that the person knows is tion fees for Orucks and truck tractors with an ef ga.;o?ir.e :a-, is a: e: before the :?:iad disuib-
stolen. 07/01/95 empty weight in excess of 16,000 pounds. utor acquiring the fuel. Clatifies definitions of
HB 1021 - Ownershi tax on rental vehicles. 01/01/96
P "distributor" and "refiner." Requires itemized
Requires rental caz companies that aze autho- SB 131 - Driver's licenses, insurance policy distributor statements about the acquisition
rized to collect ownership taxes from persons premiums, provisional license afterrehabilita- and disposition of gasoline. 07/01/95
who rent vehicles to submit and report tazes tivetreatrnent,financialresponsibility,release SB 169 - Special fuel tax. Allows any person
monthl to the coun where the vehicles are of proof and evidence of insurance. Prohibits
Y h' operating amotor vehicle other than a qualified
rented rather than to the county where the an insurer from increasing the premium of an motor vehicle, such as small two-axle diesel
rinci al office of the rental car com an is insured or a family member of the insured if it
P P P Y powered trucks, to bring into the state for the
located. 07/01/95 would result in an excessive or unfairly dis- operation of that vehicle only the amount of
HB 1094 - Sale of custom trailers. Exempts criminatory premium. Allows the department special fuel contained in the ordinary fuel tank
gersons who sell custom trailers from the re- to issue a driver's license to a person who had of the vehicle without being liable for payment
quirement to maintain a sepazate place of busi- previously had his/her license revoked based of the state special fuel tax. 04/07/95
ness other than their residence if they have upon a physical or mental limitation if such MpSCELL.4NE0US:
been residents of Colorado for the preceding 12 person is receiving certain care. 05/23/95
months and if they have less than four custom SB 167 - License plates, automobile dealers/ HB 1145 - Department of Revenue (various
hailers in inventory at any time. Requires Wholesalers, full-use dealer plates, transfer provisions). Exempts a charitable organization
motor vehicle dealers who aze issued plates and assignment, and annual fee. Authorizes from the state sales tax if retail sales of tangible
because they sell custom trailers to use the thedepartrnentto issue full-use dealerplates to Personal property for fund raising purposes do
plates on the custom trailers only. be used in lieu of license plates issued for not occur more than 12 days per yeaz and if
04/17/95 privately-owned motor vehicles. 01/01/96 revenue from retail sales does not exceed
HB 1222 - Used motor vehicle sales. Requires SB 172 - Motor vehicle insurance, uninsured $25,000 in a calendaz year. Clarifies the
motor vehicle dealers to deliver or facilitate the motorists and study. Directs the transportation definition of "good cause" for purposes of
delivery of an out-of-state certificate of title to legislation review committee to examine the refusing or denying a beer or liquor license
the purchaser or transferee within 30 days after problem.of uninsured motorists and to propose renewal or initial application. Allows wineries
thedaeeofsaie.ratherthanrequiringdeliveryof legislation to alleviate the problem. D'uects with manufacturer's licenses to conduct tastings
the cerrificate immediately upon sale. the committee to examine the current compul- and sell wine, food and general merchandise on
07/01/95 sory motor vehicle insurance system and other the licensed premises and one other licensed
Y-IB 1236 - Some nonresidents exempt from enforcement mechanisms, including uninsured location.04/27/95
motor vehicle registration. A nonresident motorist identification database programs Local Sales Tax Collection
employed in Colorado using his or her own adopted in other states to help verify owner
vehicle in commuting daily from another state compliance with motor vehicle financial secu- CI1an9@S
to a Colorado place of business is exempt from rity requirements. 2 EffeCtiveJuly l,thecityaf Sheridan
registering the vehicle in Colorado. Nonresi- 05/23/95
dent students are also exempt if they display a PORTS OF ENTRY: added an exemption for the purchase of
valid nonresident student identi~cation tag HB 1068-Motorcarriers. Allows the issuance food for home consumption.
issued by the school where the student is en- of temporary certificates through the state's ~~so effective 7uly 1, the town of
rolled. Applies only if the state where the ports of entry for motor carriers handling cer- Silverthorne beCame self-collected.
person lives extends the same privileges to tain agricultural products. 05/31/95 Theirlocaltax shouldnot be reported on
Colorado residents. 03/31/95 HB 1085 - Truck tractors. Changes the defini- the State's Sales Tax Retum (DR 0100).
HB1349-Substitutelicenseplates. Ifalicense tion of the term "truck tractor" by making a VendorsshouldstartusingSilverthome'S
plate to be replaced is in the possession of an distinction between "laden" and "unladen." fOim.
applicant for a substitute plate, the applicant is Specif'ies exclusions applicable to the 75-foot For more information order the latest
requued to surrender the plate to DOR at the length limitation for specialized equipment COpy Of Forn1 DRP 1002 (07/95) by
time of application. For replacement of per- used to transport automobiles and boats. Calling theFornlSLine, (303) 534-1408.
sonalized plates, the depattment must issue a 07/01/95
d~C
TOVVN O F VA I L
cf
COUNCIL COIVTIiVGENCY
Account # 01-0100-52857
1995
Contingency
Funds
Original Budget Amount $50;000
Uses:
Sister City Program 7,800
Grundig Mountain Bike Race 15,000
Abe Shapiro memorial contribution 200
Pete Edrington memorial contribution 200
John Hazard memorial contribution 200
Hoedowrn corporate table 400
Bus system - VA 400
10th Mountain Division (Memoriat Day) 3,000
Legal fees - reseawh low-interest financing for Vail Commons purchasers 2,000
VLt,
Total Amount Used 29,200
Total Amount Left $20,800
$11,375 is authorized
COUCON95 PAGE 09/07/95
1
• -
~e
eg
TORW OF I~AIL
75 South F'rontage Itoad
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
14'AX 970-479-2157
MED9A ADVISORl(
September 6, 1995
Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information Office
VA~~ ~~WN C0UNCUL HIGBiLIGHTS FOR SEPTEMBER 5
Work Session Braefs
Council members present: Johnston, Lapin,* fVavas, Osterfoss, Slifer, Steinberg
*Lapin did not participate in the Vail Commons discussion
--Vail Commons Contract and Policy Issues
The Council reviewed a list of 15 discussion points currently under negotiation with the
Vail Commons development team in preparation for a final contract on the project.
John Caldwell, City Market real estate director, responded to the town's requests with
additional detail, and in some cases, counter proposals on: rent payment schedules;
gross sales exclusions; use and administration of 18 (24 bedrooms) City Market
employee housing units; residency eligibility waivers for up to three City Market
management employees who qualify to purchase the for-sale housing; below-market
rental rates for the day care center operator; procedures for negotiation at the end of the 49 year term of the lease; "dark period" schedules; extension of the residential land
rental schedule to 99 years (which cuts the rent in half); payment of real estate taxes;
water tap fees; and frontage road improvements.
Also yesterday, in reviewing the prioritized categories for lottery selection of those in
line to purchase the 53 housing units, the Council agreed to give higher priority to
employers wanting to purchase a unit for employees of a Vail business than individuals
who reside and are employed outside the Town of Vail boundaries, but who live within
Eagle County. The categories, in priority order, are: 1) individuals with the longest
consecutive record of employment within the Town of Vail boundaries; 2) individuals
with the longest consecutive record of residency within the Town of Vail boundaries; 3)
employers who may purchase a unit specifically for employees of a Vail business; and
4) individuals who reside and are employed outside the Town of Vail boundaries but
inside Eagle County.
The afternoon Vail Commons discussion concluded with a brief overview of a project to
create design and site planning guidelines for the remainder of the West Vail
commercial area. The work, to be conducfed this fall by Winston & Associates of
Boulder, will include guidelines for pedestrian circulation, automobile circulation,
bicycle connections, frontage road improvements, landscaping, residential elements
and possible architectural treatments. The master planning document is intended to
~ (more)
RECYCLEDPAPER
ti
Council Highlights/Add 1
help guide future commercial redevelopment in West Vail through greater cohesion and
coordination between and among the various properties from the Vail das Schone
Building on the east to the Wendy's property on the west. For more information on the
Vail Commons project, contact Andy Knudtsen in the Community Development
Department at 479-2138.
--TOV Parking Programs/Rates
Hourly parking rates and programs for the 1995-96 ski season in the town's parking
structures will remain unchanged from last year. However, the Council decided
yesterday to modify its policies regarding the town's outlying parking programs at Ford
Park and at the soccer field. To encourage more car pooling and/or increased use of
regional transportation, the free parking program at Ford Park will require three
occupants within the vehicle (up from two occupants last season) for the upcoming ski
season. Also, the Council decided to extend the car pool policy to the soccer field.
The Council directed staff to create a management plan to implement the new policies
and to ensure fhe regional transportation system will be sufficient to handle employee
work schedules. Upon the recommendation of Town IVlanager Bob McLaurin and
Public Works/Transportation Director Larry Grafel, the Council agreed to maintain the
hourly fee schedule and free programs in the parking structures for another year. By
maintaining fihe status quo another season, the town will be able to test effectiveness of
a coordinated effort to build business during traditional non peak periods; McLaurin
said. Vail merchants who participated in a survey of 12 parking options indicated
support for retaining the free 90 minute program and retention of the 6 to 9 p.m. free
evening parking program, in particular. There was minimal support for summer parking
fees. The parking structures handle about 500,000 transactions during ski season, or
about 19,000 vehicles per day. Of those, 47 percent are free transactions. The
average length of stay is five to seven hours and the average fee is between $7 and
$8. For a copy of the survey results, contact the Community Information Office at 479-
2115. While hourly rates will remain the same this season, debit cards will be
increased from $4.75 to $5 per day. Blue passes will be sold for $525, while gold
passes will cost $1,100. The town's parking rates for the 1995-96 ski season will begin
on Nov. 22 and will continue to April 14, 1996.
--Open Space Charter Amendment
The Council reviewed an ordinance to amend the Town of Vail Charter to protect
designated open space in preparation for the evening meeting (see evening briefs for
details). --PEC Report
During a staff update on the most recent Planning and Environmental Commission meeting, the Council was informed of a request to table until Nov. 7 a request for a
major amendment to a Special Development District to allow for expansion of the Glen
Lyon office building.
(more)
e
;
Council Highlights/Add 2
--Information Update
The Council declined a request by the Vail Valley Foundation to place the 1989 World
Alpine Ski Championship monument in the middle of the south roundabout. Instead,
the Council directed staff to look for other, more suitable locations.
During a progress report, Public Works/Transportation Director Larry Grafel indicated
the Main Vail intersection will likely be closed on Sept. 19 and 20 to allow for the final
layer of asphalt on the roundabout. Grafel has asked the contractor to research if the
paving can be done at. night to reduce the public's inconvenience.
The Council authorized spending the remainder of the May town wide clean-up budget,
about $1,800, to help pay for dumpster fees for a special clean-up in the Matterhorn
neighborhood.
--The Council recommended Town Manager Bob McLaurin for appointment to the
Colorado fVlunicipal League policy committee. •
--Council Reports
Paul Johnston said he was preparing to move forward with announcement of a new
youth award. Johnston also asked about the status of an education campaign on
safeguarding trash from bears and other animals.
iVierv Lapin suggested the town apply for GOCO state lottery grants. At Lapin's
suggestion, the Council also agreed to spend up to $2,000 in Council contingency
funds to hire the town's bond counsel to research the possibility of providing low-
interest financing for those wishing to purchase the 53 for-sale residential units at Vail
Commons. For more information, contact Town fVlanager Bob NicLaurin at 479-2105.
Tom Steinberg reported on a recent meeting of Northwest Colorado Council of
Governments in which State Rep. Russell George of Rifle presented a growth-relief bill
that would provide financial relief to political entities wrho are impacted by unusual
growth in an adjacent political entity.
Sybill Navas gave an update on the Channel 5 board of directors meeting. Following
the update, Council members expressed interest in increased utilization of the
television station to communicate with the community.
Peggy Ostertoss indicated continued interest by ESPN to film an extreme sport
television series in Vail. John Garnsey of the Vail Valley Foundation will be asked to
give an update on the project. .
Osterfoss also indicated the TOV-VA Task Force is making progress with the first,
integrated attempt to try to move visitors to the non peak seasons.
Rod Slifer stressed the need for permanent signs in the roundaboufi.
(more)
e
~
Council Highlights/Add 3
Evening Briefs
Council members present: Johnston, Navas, OsterFoss, Slifer Steinberg, Strauch
--Citizen Participation
Bob Fiske, a part-time Town of Vail bus driver; complained of "unfair and improper
hiring practices" when the town selected a candidate to fill a full-time bus driver
position. Mayoc Peggy Osterfoss asked Fiske to work out his concerns with the town
manager.
--Consent Agenda .
The Council approved on consent agenda a request for modifications to conditions of
approval of a previously granted sign variance request for Curtin-Hill Sports, located at
254 Bridge St. For details, contact Randy Stouder in the Community Development
Department at 479-2138.
--Jim Shearer Award of Appreciation
Former Vail Town Councilman Jim Shearer was presented with an award for his three-
plus years of public service. Shearer, who was forced to resign from office when he
could no longer find housing in Vail, said he hoped his predicament would send a loud
and clear message to other local governments to share in the responsibility of providing.
affordable housing.
--Vail Commons Discussion
An update was presented by Town Attorney Tom Moorhead on the status of contract
negotiations with the Vail Commons development team. Moorhead summarized
discussions which occurred at the afternoon work session. He also read an open letter
from Councilman Merv Lapin indicating Lapin's decision to refrain from participating in
the Vail Commons discussion. T.hen, project manager Andy Knudtsen of the town's
Community Development Department announced City Market's willingness to fund
construction of a center turn lane on the frontage road from the Vail Commons site to
. the West Vail interchange to help mitigate traffic impacts. A timetable for design and
site plan guidelines for the remainder of the West Vail commercial corridor was
presented. The criteria for the lottery for the for-sale housing was also presented. The
discussion ttien turned to an update on a proposal to combine day care and a
community center on the site by adding a second story to the 3,000 sq. ft. day care
center (which would be housed on top of the supermarket). Mayor Peggy OsterFoss
called the concept a good idea. However, the second story proposal exceeds the site's
maximum height requirement of 38 feet, she said. A variance would be difficult
because it would require a physical hardship. Therefore, Osterfoss said, an interim
solution'might be to share a community meeting room within the day care center while
a proposal to add a community room to the proposed West Vail fire station is pursued.
Town Manager Bob McLaurin said three sites are currently under consideration for the fire station. A site recommendation is anticipated within 90 days. Or, if the community
is more interested in a pavilion facility in a park-like setting, Osterfoss said the Council
(more) .
a
<
e .
Council Highlights/Add 4
was willing to discuss a more appropriate site for such a facility. She referenced some
of the town parks as better locations for a pavilion than the commercial area of West
Vail. Several members of the public participated in the Vail Commons discussion.
Cindy Steitz of West Vail suggested the need for a community building or recreafional
center, citing such amenities in. smaller communities, including Rifle, Rangely and
iVleeke,r. iViartin Waldbaum expressed concer-n about the risk to the tovvn if City Market .
defaul4s on its construction loan, while Lars Burghardt said a new grocery store,
needing more employees, wrill put a crunch on an already tight housing situation in Vail. .
Meanwhile, Housing Authority Chairman Jen Wright encouraged to Council to push
ahead with the project--grocery store and all-=noting the most importanfi aspect of the
development is the affordable housing componen4. 1/Vright also urged the Council to
reduce or eliminate residential land lease fees to help reduce a home buyer's monthly
mortgage payment. For more information on the Vail Gommons development, contact
Andy Knudtsen in the Community Development Departmen4 at 479-2138.
--Charter Amendment Ordinance to Protect Open Space
The Council voted 6-0 to approve an ordinance on first reading which would amend the
Town of Vail Charter to protect designated open space. After second reading approval,
the charter amendment ordinance will be submitted to Vail voters in the iVov. 21
municipal election. If approved by voters, the amendmen4 would create a three-
member Open Space Commission and require a vote of the people befiore designated
properties could be sold, leased, or have the zoning changed to a non open space
zone district. Properties would be placed in a designated open space status through
Council action as recommended by.the Open Space Commission. The Commission
members would include fihe town manager, one town council member and one member
from the Planning and Environmental Commission. The action essentially freezes
zoning on certain designated properties in perpetuity unless, and until, a majority of the
Town of Vail voters decide to remove the designated open space classification. The
voter approval provision is recommended in the town's Comprehensive Open Lands
Plan adopted in 1994. For additional details, contact Russell Forrest in the Community
Development Department at 479-2138. --Resolution Amending the Town of Vail Deferred Compensation Plan
The Council voted 6-0 to adopt a resolution amending the definition of employees
eligible to participate in the deferred compensation plan. For details, contact Finance
Director Steve Thompson at 479-2116.
--Glen Lyon Office Building
This ordinance to modify the Special Development District for the Glen Lyon office
building was tabled to the Nov. 7 meeting at the request of the applicant.
--Town of Vail vs. Chevron USA, Inc. and Amoco Oif Co. Settlement .
The Council voted 6-0 to adopt a resolution approving a cour4 settlemen4 stemming
from the release of petroleum product in 1989 on the old town shop lot. Chevron has
(more)
~
Council Highlights/Add 5
agreed to remediate any ground water contamination at the site, while the town will
assume responsibility for any state required remediation of soil contamination on the
prope_rty. For details, contact Town Attorney Tom Moorhead at 479-2107.
# # #
. Upcoming Discussion Top6cs
September 12 Work Session
Jeff Layman 15 Year Anniversary
Annie Fox 10 Year Anniversary
Employee Opinion Survey Results
DRB & PEC Reports Building and Planning Fees
Sound Committee Report
September 99 Work Session
Contribution Requests
Liquor Board Interviews
Eagle County Regional Airport Overview
September 19 Evening Meeting
Vail Commons
Liquor Board Appointment -
ftE v~~,
O u r M i s s i o n i s Y o u r S u c c e s s X c' (/ftLkXki
~~YJ
OLOIP
_ • 1?k.~-~
' 1 0 0 1 k , , ~ , 4 k \ T R A V E L & T O U R I S M A U T H O R I T Y ~ v
August 1995
Dear Stakeholders and Friends of CTTA:
With autumn approaching and the Colorado Travel and Tourism Authority nearing the completion
of its fourth month of existence, it seems an appropriate juncture to give you a progress report and
a sense of CTTA's direcdon. Our history is brief but I andcipate a bright future based on what is
accomplished to date. .
I'd like to rirst mention your Board of D'uector's and their commitment to lead, shape and advocate
this fledgling organization. 11us group of leaders has not merely maintained, but increased, the
energy and enthusiasm that coalesced at their retreat and inaugural Directors' meedng in April.
Their attendance at monthly meetings is nearly perfect; all Directors serve on at least one
committee and most serve on two. These are working committees that meet often, conduct tiealthy
debate and make solid recommendations to the full Board regarding all aspects of the strategic
direction of CTTA. You need to know, also, that each Director has fully contributed to CTTA
they've put their money where their mouth is. Their mission is your success.
One of the first decisions made by your Boazd, other than to roll up their sleeves, was to own and operate the 1-800-COLORADO phone number that served the State in the past. The decision was
reached on NTay 4 and the number was in CTTA's possession and operating by June 5. With 24
hour per day answering, the Product Line has handled more than 50,040 phone calls to date on
behalf of the CTTA.
A special committee has been established to explore the possibilities of using the 800 number for
more than just information fulfillment. The "one stop shopping " committee is charged with
developing methods of taking an 800 caller as close as possible to the sale of any CTTA
Stakeholder's.lotlging pioperty, recreation venue, attraction, meedng facility or other travel
product. The oudook for this project is promising and we will keep you informed.
Another coup for CTTA was acquiring the Internet address, colorado.com. Colorado's home page
is being developed now. CTTA will be on-line soon with information about all its Stakeholders.
Look for more about this exciting development and how you can participate in the near future.
CTTA recently passed a$6Qa,000 budget.for R/Lay through Decembez 1995. This includes
$220,000 for Informadon Services (800 number and fulfillment) and $230,000 for advertising and
other promodonal programs beginning with Autumn 1995. Other important lines in the budget for
projects already underway include Database Development, which is our mailing list of the 11,000+
travel and tourism business in Colorado, Invoicing, and Stakeholder Relations. We've also
purchased a desk and some chairs to augment those being provided so graciously by ICarsh &
Hagan Advertising.
Speaking of Karsh & Hagan, it is very important to mendon their significant contribudons to
CTTA. All aecount service, media service and creadve service, which is the time spent on P.O. BOX 3524 • ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80155
TELEPHONE (303) 779•5965 • FAX (303) 770•8410
~ CTTA's account by highly qualified advertising pros, is provided at no charge to CTTA. This
represents approximately $25,000. Thank you, Karsh & Hagan! By the way, K&H has also
acquired over $39,000 in free adverrising in several publications like Food & Wine, Ski & Skiing,
Outside and American Heritage magazines. These and several other publishers have all been
extremely generous with their valuable media space. If you make contact with any of the reps from
these magazines or newspapers, please say thank you.
CTTA is meeting with a major credit card company to develop a summer 1996 advertising and
promodonal campaign. The possibility for this exciting co-op to happen is very high; however, it
is dependent on the annual contribudons from those businesses which have not yet contributed to
CTTA. This promotional project would be the first of many with this paRicular partner and we
look forward to putting it together and working with them.
There have been several articles in papers throughout the state recently reoorting a decline in
tourism. Often these stories cite the lack of a tourism office as the reason for the decrease. If you
are given opportunity, lease talk with these reporters about the CTTA, what we've done and what
our plans aze. Hearing progress reported by someone in your position is just what the state needs
to boost its image.
One of the primary aspects of CTTA's pragram is its belief in, and desire to, deliver tangible
benefits to its Stakeholders. Although CTTA believes it is resgonsible for promodng Colorado as
a destination to travel customers, we are firm in our resolve to provide as many opportunities to
increase business or direcdy affect the business of each of our contributing partners. 'Ihis is a
topic for discussion and debate at nearly every meedng and as a result every program to be designed for CTTA will be considered on its ability to deliver individual and collective benefits.
'Ilie Directors believe in taking their meetings to Stakeholders, therefore, each meeting will be held
in a different location throughout Colorado. One of the first items on our monthly agenda is the
Stakeholders' open fonun designed to provide you the opporlunity to be heard by the full board.
We encourage you to attend our meetings to observe what we're doing and, just as importantly, to
express your thoughts about CTTA's performance and programs. We invite you to call 303-770-
3736 to learn about our meeting schedule and we look forward to seeing you and hearing from you
at a meedng in the near future. I will ston for now although there's more good stuff to tell. I've tried to give you the flavor of
CTTA, some of what we've done, what we're doing and where we're going. Thank you for your
staunch support of CTTA. We look forward to helping you be more successful.
Sincerely,
~
Rich Meredith President
.
Allen D. (Dave) Miller R E CEI 1/E0 ~
~ P.O. Box 567
Palmer Lake, Colorado 80133 (719) 481-2003 ~ FAX (719) 481-3452 XC:
August 28, 1995
PJ[emo toa Co?orado l[,egns9a$ours
IFro¢aBe Dave Mnl?tr
Sub,pect: ]Invesgagatnon off CoIorado W$ter Giveaway to the Fede¢~~~ Govee-nment
On the 22nd day of 1VTarch 1993, the Colorado Water Conservation Board allowed the West
Slope to improperly transfer over $1 billion worth of Colorado's most developable Colorado River.
Compact waters to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Colorado's legislature should thoroughly
investigate this state tragedy, as it seriously violates CWCB's legislative charter to plan, develop, and
conserve Colorado's interstate compact entitlements for current and future generations.
The federal "taking" of the Taylor Park Reservoir Refill Decree was a major governmental
blunder, caused by misguided intent and misuse of state testunony in Gunnison Water Coun.
During the unprecedented refill trial (86CW203), the court was improperly led to believe the
Taylor River fishery had improveti because of a 1975 Reservoir Mana.gement Agreement that increased
flows below the dam. However, a careful after-the-fact reading of the State Fish Flow study clearly
shows the fishery improvement was due to reduced river flow "fluctuations" not "higher flows" as
understood by the court. The fish study also shows the six study sites were 22 miles below the dam,
where intefNening tributaries mak-e river flows nearly double that of the court-designated Taylor Dam
Gauging Station.
As a resuIt of these serious judicial errors, the court awarded a West Slope refill decree with
"optimal river flows" that would require 50% more water than the total avera.ge virgin flow of the Taylor
River. The unsustainable optimal summer flows are 350 to 5501'6 higher than the reasonable CWCB
decreed minimal.flows for fish at Taylor Park Dam. T'he court's concept of "optimal flows" is entirelv
new under CoIoraao water Iaw. '
In spite of protests by Arapahoe County, CWCB supported the West Slope position in Colorado Supreme Court. tieither CWCB or the higher court was willing to review the factual enors. The linited
States supported the Arapahoe position until immediately before the trial. Incredibly, the L.S. switched
sides after the VVest Slope river districts agreed to assign all water rights to the U. S. within 60 days of the
final decree.
Although the court record indicates the trial was primarily over historical flows for fish, all
persons involved would truthfi211y admit the real iritent was to reduce the unallocated state waters
available for high altitude storage and gravity distribution to East Slope needs. CVdCB's involvement in this case should be thoroughly evaluated, because it exemplifies the
twenty-year "understanding" between West Slope and state natural resource leaders that Colorado's vast
untapped Gunnison waters are off-limits for East Slope needs. If this artificial state barrier were lifted,
Colorado would have ample ]ow-cost renewable surface water for its current and future generations.
. ~
W.-O WE
ain
' . , . ~ ,
,
~
. . . ' . .
- . - - _ _ _ .
lbesday, Aug. 29, 1995
3E30
t500. In De9Ign@ted -
Colorado s#ill has foglitong c~~ance to reverse water iiianagement blundem
The U.S. Supreme Cotirt re- /lrkansas Etiver Gomp.ict. fluw slucly a»c1 pr.essure from aC-
cently decided t}iat Colmado is 131uncler No. ? also evolvecl dhir- livists, who7re cleterlYiiried to keep
guilty of stealitig Kansas' water ing this tirne wlien sl.deand fccleral 04c?r,icio's water flowing freely
tlu-ough exccssivc pumpinK ft-otrl ofluc-ials lusf. tlicir vi5ic~n ,ind d()wnrivct'.
irrigation wells in tlie Lower Ar- usc Coloraclo's tnidevelupccl O?I- I`urlunately, stale and federal
kansas River Valley. Recause of this orndo 1Ziver Cmiip"Ir,.i entitlements, ()fGci;ils ran reverse the Gunnison
serious, lotiK-lerut vic>{ai.io»n uf thc Thc l.urkest c:1stially ()f tliis pqflir.y rcfill crrm- lu ,iIl()w carly resolulioii
1949 Arkansas Iliver Cnmpact, shift w:1s the i'ln~emi nf Rerlrinmi- 4 Ilic K,ins;is suif.. Reversal of this
ColoraClo taxpayr_r~ arc n~~w far.ecl lioni's u?s( ~cl /1rit;inr;ri : rl~~rr~•~• ~•ni~ :~15() hel() tiiit.igatE' the
witlt a$10U i»illiu?i claitt) fi-otji !'n?jecl, wliirll wmflcl Imve (1(mlrlcd (i.1t11;~ge (-'alt5ccl hy ticglect of Col-
Kansas for rciml)urfiemrnt. Cnlo- ('~?I~~r;ulu's tr:?nsmoiint:1iii w,iier fo~r t w;id(?'s strsitegic wat:er neecls.
rado's itunoceni: Arkansas Valley ilti I lydrIIl(? gisls Icnuw t:h'aL gravity
farmers are also faced wiUi eithcr ['lalte rivrr basins. cicliveries f1-o»Ta drought-cycle stor-
diying up their family farms or buY- I3lunder No. 3 is pr(Ambly the aj;e mn the ( ;ulinisoii side of the
ing expensive water ta maintain worst single water mistalcc in l;()1- (;m it incntal Uivide would be worth
Arkansas River flows tor J{arisas orac(u's hisl:c>ry. C)n Marcli 'l,l, I993, I>illimnti fu flie r«viroautient's and
during critical dry ycars. West Slope water r»sirmgc~rs (iiiiel I}7 CC()n()iiiies uf bollt slopes. '1'liey
Meanwhile, Colorado's vast un- I:ransferrec.l Colo raclo?'S mo,sf. valii- ,?Is(i Icno?w tliat urban water and
developedCnloradoRivez- Cocnpact ahle uiidcvelupecl %vatcr shiin{(e j)(1wez ievenues could yuickly
waters ate still flowing freely to righl to thc fcclcral kovcrnnienl.. rmrr thr esliiiaalecl $464 t»illiott
Arizona, Nevada and California. This "[aylor lWlt llcsr.rV()ir llefi{I c~c~st 1 u~>erinit. ancl construct ati
Colorado's Kansas debacle was llecrec: was origi~ially jusl.ifccl to? 11~)pc~r (,uunisun reservoir with
eaused Uy:tliree major water riian- provicle inore watr,r fui- Tfiylmr j,mvily e:macluit:s to holh slopes. .
agerrientblunders: Itiver fish durinR heavy riuio,ff Co,lm-aciu slicnilcl Itut be denied a
~ Blunder No: 1 started abaut 30 yr,irs. Ilrmevct; cvcry (ishernmn f;icilily Iliat can tisc Cc~lor:tdo's su~-
yearsagowhenstateofficialsbegan ltriow. Csli (4) not rcrIiiiic inmre pliis; w:ik-.t- fo?r lc?w-c~c?st tlrouglit
issuing.hundreds oftugh-volume waf;er when rivers are flc,ocliriy,. pr(?tec.tio,n. ,
well`'permits : without considering "'his mistake was r.~t~sc~cl l,y ~r~is- Dave Miller
the depletion impacts on the inter1wetation c,f :i Cr~lr~r:i~ln fis'll l'aImer Lalce
•
^ Allen D. (Dave)' Miller
P.O. Box 567
~ Palmer Lake, Colorado _80133
_ (719) 48 I -2003 , FAX (7l9) 481-3452
A ul IV~`~'
0 d"/~40-OWC J17
§oee,;A1 Oelqp-.~~ j4reewe y ~s Fv r ~i~.e%sXy f& : 7'`
llPLJ~ ee.,r i-e.e~`~'",~~~~;~ y~v -,o~.
,
~~~?i~'~~ ~~Gas.~~{~' ~J~..~ sUUa~ ~
~ ~ ~ P~ r li°~diJ~~.~ Jl ai~ ~ ~'•w i ~
~
p~i''e! ,
/ l
A+s ~eeaj de 44e7-4 ~11.6p.4c(61
l.~s~ ~ G ye.~ . S•~~c v,~ ~ e~~.~a~ ~voiy"~e.
7e-
. /7` ved 4 --e,4
~ i
.~es7 /~fe- T:
Z 7 id,~-i~l f` t~VeC1'v~~
7a i-Cz-a lve 7~4~ A-~" S-~ ;7~ ~ 4e-r-
~ 4il
~
Allen D. (Dave) Miller .
P.O. Box 567 ~
Palmer Lake, Colorado 80133
(719) 481-2003 • FAX (719) 481-3452
A~yvsT 2,~
D7-o~ igD ve r wpl- ko y/Qo~P
/
1ct&*l : Nve- /`'li l/er- A6~
~G : lP~ ~'s,q j!~F Ccl r.4da s Fval vi r~'~-is~;r r
f~sk ~'a rAAr Ar.4j0Aho e~ C,a c,.JI' .6 r: e~':.v aaJ
/~fe 1~~4.~v/iOS ~d b e+.vG~!'TS o~ >`T.s ~`a.w>i:sc~.? ~~.4d -
J,c,t.4~'e/` e ~'Inol ecT _
1. /`tS/~ ~a` ~r ~02 AL'i ,-t"r:af d.J 7;
S7~ T`s rc .le s~) A 4-d e rA ~ ye Herwti
3. ~Q,~~~~~ ~e~,~ar -~e~ ~,s,•r ~d
,
T~i e a~f - r: ve,- ~,~,v.sc.~ s~or•4~ ~ s; 7--c. 7`~
4~
alerxc4 Ga/~eP' ~&A-,- loyoA., evT /o14.v aic AcT~.~/.
. x7o. . a .
F4~COLO . . .
~ ~ .f~ l,Pi?t,fZU91( f .l ~C Md°'~.a~~ ~'?~/°.~.~Pll J ~ ~1,~~Z~`~lISZ
ZI'S Volurnr~ 99, Plumber GG ~
.
d -
~
Col .~st ill a hig fan of Hoover D
In a tmertt e=y, tV_v-"pr• cnliuniii." col+itnnisi quntes firniqe Speaker dent on the tivvi lae lielpect statxiuQ.' Gco?W I'. W111 wtites in :rwr, of Ilcxivin tJewt (:fngriclt: 0 l;cn4^tnma1011 ofllicdarnacAatthclivr9
Darn -arici says projcm of a siirtilar smpe 'We need a seties of lalge pro)ects, of I 10 men, °xnne ofdiem viulms oEfjeat
woildn'edotheornnuyabitoflwrmtalay, You don't liolc.t together the ftee people prostration in temperatures that o(}en
I3uI1dIng Fioaver Dam fimt requirad of the planet by small diuigs.... We tapped 125 d
ei7ees deeP [n the cartyon.°
mwing the Colorado River, 1Mll pofnts ougtn to be back on the moon. We Could l Iocrver Dam be built todayt
ouL 'Itien, thausandy of inen woridng in ought ta be on Mars. And we ougbe to Will thinlc.v it could °Ef ft did not unduly
diree shIfts around the dock every day do !t witli :t!l the fnee nations of die incomenfence svme cousin of the snail
excePt Ctuistmas and die Fourth of )uty, - planet partldpating, so that we butld a darter, and if all the impact statements
and paid $6 a day, from whldt $1.60 ivas momentum of the human race...." and radal set-asides cou(d be negoti-
subcraueci for food, housing and uans- tlehin(i 1 loover Dam Is UtIce Mead- ated before evY~cyone decideci the whole
portation, poured 4.4 million inb1c yanis which holds enough water, WiII tay:v, 'to dilng was roo much trouble.°
ofwnaete, enough to pave a fiIgliway 16 cvver f'enn.rytvania a foot deep.' And (n die 193(ts, however, °before it was
R. wide from New York ro San I'randsoo.° ne<v the dam is Las Vegu, ttie fastest coruideted m[rect to be a mnscientiuus
That was 60 yeacs agr). 7he job.took gm)wing city in the nation. In 1935, he ohjector to the 'mnquest' of nature,
less than tour years, and was done two ploirits out, las Vel,,,~s had a pc,pulation of Americans had :ua appetite tor big con-
years ahead ofschedule. 7,000. lt4 population tociay is t million. queiingprojecis,° Wt11 says. In the 1940s
'[,etusnowptaisetthosewliomnm.icecl Wiil sets forth additional iiaforma- ffierewastliealomicbomb.lndie1950s
andaceaiteddhisstill-brtaditaldngmazveJ,' tion about Hoover Dam: Uiere was the Interstate HighwaySystem.
Wtll edhorm ttis readas, 'Md lrq u9 paiue - It s named atter I ierbcrt ! Ioriver, ttie And in 1969 t1.ie Apollo I'roject 'fuifillecl
during dis season of disoontes;t with tlie president who nns an enginccr and who a grneriiment -ow made in 1961.'
federal$ovecntnent and all Its wridcg to mn- PncrninRed ihP projecx. "l le wa4 srYTrrary '1bJay, sar. Wl!!, 'thc movie Aro!!o
sidawhatwehavelostthatthewwiUyliad ofr.ommcrcc in 1922 when ihe{:alorado 13 is thrilling audienucs for whoin the
when itliadawill Corstidi grratwoileq.' I2iver (;ompact allocated the tiver amonp, "hilaration of collective adiievemcnt
Having thijs put the natbon's cap- the states it un2s.'I'cxiay, half the poE»da- tli?oupJi goveintnent is bttt a rumor
ital in the picture, the cottservaeive tiom o(die West iv to sortie exterit clepni- about IonR ago." '
v 04 ee:~0 .JL2
~
.
• . .
Leave_M.6fterhorn f6r Qocal$ -'in, which I would find surprising'any time soon'
Junk, Too much J'unk, I ' . ` _ (But i
guess, is really the issue.'Or is could weU be their intent, and she just might cave.yLL~:,~:y
it? It seems the Town of Vail is leaning on one lorig-stand- - TO ~Y developei-s out there, I realize this piece of land.•:'
ing indePendenf landowner because she keeps an unkempt looks asgood to you as my landlord's head on a plafe
back po~h. Try as she may, she cannot seem to keep her ~'ould to the Towri'of Vail, but please leave the Matter-:~.'L.
tenants from allowing their power washers and tool boxes hOrn area alone. It is a landmazk. If we are ever to lace~;s~,
to peek out from inconspicuous places. Furthermore, the anY imP°rtance on the needs of the people who help Pmaice ~J
transient and fickle nature oP her tenants (as most of us this town a town, Matterhorn must remain what it is:.
have become out here) lends itself to junk piles among the most closely-knit affordable housing community in'this $tall grass and wildflowers. Tenants bring their bicycles, town, despite the junk. The Matterhorn area, and;:its,. -
cars and other belongings, then leaye them behind in rusty °Wner, have given wonderful service to this town`foi;
heaps for the landiady to deal with and go their merry wa . ma°Y, many years in providing this kind of housing..We~
with shiny new toys. But regardless of the junk on'the c~not'be tempted to allow a situation that could use a,r~.
property or how it got there, where have I been? I was not considerable amount of improvement, but that would be `
aware the neighborhood junk was obscuring the view well worth the effort, turn into a situation in which a few .
from Vail Town Hall. . : people make a lot of money to very little common good:
The neighboring landowners, of whom there are few, Let us not sit around in five years asking ourselves; even
have been leaning on her as well. You guessed it, because more than now, questions like: How did Vail lose all sem-
of the junk, but I doubt that's all. I have a sneaking hunch blance of a real community? W}ien did the housing'pinli~~
they are pressuring her to sell. Now, I don't know this for lem become so incredi6ly bad? Why did everyone mov '
sure, but I bet since the value of the land is so high, because down-valley? Or maylie this will tum out to be. anottie~
of the location, that they will most likel case of Vail residents slowly being ~
sold down the river: `a~.;
y try , to sell the . Kath
whole parcel to one developer to make the highest profit. ryn Haughey' '
If this turns out to be so, I su ppose, they will have figared Scott Pittman
MatterhornVai1
anmg would be better than their view of car skeletons
that can be seen now, even if it is another resorthotel or ~
somebody's six-figure second home sitting vacant for most
of the year: We ought to take bets on which real-estate Lett~~~
giant or developer jumps on the chance to develop the Mat- Letters to the Editor should include a signature,
terhom area. (Poor rent-paying locals only, please. At least' address and phone number.l'he Daily reserves the _
then a few of us would get something out of the dea]! This
is, of course, assuming that first, this is the intent of the S e d letter~s to P.O 1Box 81 nVail, COa8~165gmmar.
neighbors and second, that this woman eventually caves ~
- ,
\
dd
e~
TOWN OF VAdL
75 South Frontage Road Offzce of thc Towiz Maiiager
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157
September 7, 1995
Mr. Paul Golden
Managing Director
Vail Associates, Inc.
Post Office Box 7
Vail, Co 81658
Dear Paul:
This is a long overdue response in regard to your letter requesting a memorial marker to
commemorate the successful 1994 World Mountain Bike Championships.
Your idea was well received by the Town Council. Unfortunately, we now have a dilemma as to
where such a memorial should be placed. The Vail Valley Foundation currently has a design in mind
for the 1999 World Alpine Ski Championships, and in an attempt to combine that with the `89
Championships marker and possibly the memorial you suggested, leaves us inquiring as to the proper
location.
We currently are looking at a variety of sites, including the following: the Vista Bahn; the Golden
Peak redevelopment; Seibert Circle; and the rock retaining walls on the perimeter of tfie new
Roundabout at the main Vail intersection, among others. It will take some additional time to
coordinate location for all of these markers. The Town Council discussed at their worksession just
yesterday a possible location toward the center of the Roundabout but was unanimous in opposing
that due to safety considerations.
RECYCLEDPAPER
C~
Again I would like to thank you for your letter and suggestion. It is one that is being studied but will
take some additional time for resolution. Keep those good ideas coming!
Sincerely,
TOWN OF VAIL
•
Pamela A. Brandmeyer
Assistant Town Manager .
PAB/aw
xc: Vail Town Council
Robert W. McLaurin
Larry Grafel
Susan Connelly
TRANSPORTATION SALEta~ TAX BALL T QUES VN
QUICK FACTS .
. Hd~~RY:
'II'Ie EaIIoY question ns the produs:tt off a-
oecr tevo years of meetiugs oeadh vuioaas
igianicipalmes and uampor~ttation expert.s. O p,~ ~N 7HE ,i UTHORny?
'~D' Yg;~•- ~ ''B'he gollowang have betn appmved to sit '
7l HE BAL~OT QiJES71'pORl. ota the Aaiehoriey: .
A saIes tax for mass hmspwrtation Avora- T'offi Hines,.(A]teraaate Itidard
puaposes, excluding air, by efle additimn of Canis)
one-half of one perccnt Wes tax ($_005). BLuit- Keffi fiRuellear
Sges = cmllected in Basalt and 0 JebeIl Eagte- Duane Ziegler _ _ - - - ' - _
wotild be used ffor that pare of Eagle Cuuxny, Gypwni- Chris Estes (Aleernare - Jeff
ShaolB)
~MT TA~ ~SE? Mint~ Mike Ga11$gher (Alternate
LarrY Slone)
dt as estimted to taase approximtely Red CHff- apgoirned at a later daee
$3.2 mifflon annuaflly. ilaifl - Pcggy Qseexfass (Atiernate Tom .
steenber~
~HA T DOES ONE=,HALF OF ONE Beader Creek Resorc Co.- Kene Myers d'ERCEN'd' M ?
Eag1e County- Jam~s Johnso~ (Altcrnate
Ile 1l2 cent saim tax eqaaals, 5 cersis Geogse Roussos)
on $10, or SU cents pcr $100. If a fmialy
spend $200 a ffiommth on Yaon-exemp$- ite~ BIKE PATH MONlES:
. ~
the tu woufld cost ehem ~adcflieional $1 a A sub-co~itt~ of the A~xthority :.~i,
mvuth, or $12 a. year. anM be appointed ta make rec 'ons ~ .
. cornccnaing bake patls. .
WHAT IS EXEMPT FROM 7tHE SALES
Exempt from tte saies eax wil~ ~ PLAN: . .
. sales . of food, ptescpiptimn medicataomp 'fl'be regaonal transpoatation system wiIl
clectricity, coa19 wood9 nawrafl gas, gasoUm, combine the exisdng transgortation rouces of che
1tnaChinery and ffiachinc Bools. '1'hesC Original 5ystem (Lcadville to Ae?on and Edwards .
exeffiptioais wilfl ease the bu.aden on low to tO Vai1) and the Triat syscem (Gypaum/Eagte co
ffiodetcate income funi1ie5. Aeon/Vail). The system wai9 - aLso include
WHO W1lLIL MA NA(GE THE expanded ammd new routes i~ arem wherc an .
SPOlFTA77ON S~f'.5TEM9 exiseing need is p$esent (collector ran4r: in
Eagle/Vail, expansioa~ of the C'sypsuan/~g1e to
~~uthori~jr has been ar~t~ e~ AdoNVaal route to inchade Dotsero, aml.a Red
managa 6.he syStem. I11ey will malce policY ClifflMinturn to VaiVAvon rouee). The re$ioml
decisiOnS 011hOw the regi'onal system will be system will add Park-¢RIde facilities in areaffi
operated. 'IIlxy sM be responsf ble fog an where the use of the system, in the most affimial capataal and ogeration budget, and finaaciallg? re"ngible manaeer. .
long range p?antaing gor the system, ' 1l`1he Ten percene af all revernae cotlected froraa
smmal plata Wall includt schedu(itag9 faze the tax are dedicated Yo bike paets.
rate, capital expenditures,eec. Z'he Authority
will chose a system operaYOr(s) fraffi a For more anformadon coretcecB dlae corarso's
competativc pPOCess. in.farmataon oBko srB 328-8605.
~e
eg
Mff OF vAlL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
F062 9MMEDsATE RELEASE September 8, 1995
Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information
BU@LD9N~ ~~RM9TS BSS4JED BV THE TOWN OF VABL
The following building permits have been issued or applied to the Town of
Vail Community Development Department for the period August 17 to
September 7:
Villa Cortina Homeowners, 22 West Meadow Drive, alteration, $3,400, Rippy
Contractors.
Scott, 1350 Sandstone Drive, alteration, $2,700, Spencer Concrete.
Levy, 4939 Meadow Drive, remodel, $26,000, Snowshoe Development.
Timber Falls Associates, 4475 Glen Falls Lane, new residence, $750,000, Elk Ridge
Design Builders.
Gray, 5109 Black Bear Lane, windows addition, $1,000, Gray-Stone Construction.
Harley, 1873 Lions Ridge Loop, new residence, $268,248, Southwest Builders, LLC.
Brady, 1881 Lions Ridge Loop, expand deck, $3,500, Steve Gerhardt Renovations.
Otto, 122 East fVieadow Drive, remodel, $81,500, A.T. Smith Corporation.
Wachs, 2269 Chamonix Road, reroof, $16,000, fViaster Sealers, Inc.
Pack iVleadows, 1472 Matterhorn Circle, remodel, $4,500, Farrow Hitt.
f
Brey, 434 Gore Creek Drive, remodel, $22,000, A.R. Builders.
Town of Vail, 321 West MeadowDrive, relocate wall, $8,100, David Brennan
fVlasonry, Inc.
~ (more)
RECYCLEDPAPER
Building Permits/Add 1
Red Lion Condo Assoc., 304 Bridge Street, demo interior wall, $50, Red Lion
Condo Assoc.
Tichenor, 548 South Frontage Road West, remodel, $10,700, Alpine Custom
Woodworks.
Redpath, 2692 Cortina Lane, re-construct retaining wall, $35,000, Minick Construction.
Kachmer, 380,East Lionshead Circle, remodel, $2,950, C& H Woodworking.
Spencer, 380 East Lionshead Circle, remodel, $10,220, C& H Woodworking.
Morris, 164 Gore Creek Drive, remodel, $62,900, Sherman Construction.
L-0 Westhaven, Inc., 1000 Soutfi Frontage Road West, addition, $262,000, J.L. Viele
Construction.
,Stevinson, 1498 Spring Hill Lane, addition, $115,000, Gallina Company.
Isadora Investments, 600 Vail Valley Drive, addition, $155,000, Nedbo Construction.
Wagner, 5168 Gore Circle, replace decking, $5,500, Cadillac Construction.
Breakaway West Assn., 913 Lions Ridge Loop, reroof, $8,900,
NBQ Roofing/Construction. _
Forey, 1755 Gore Creek Drive, replace stair and walkway, $10,000, Karen Forey
Design Group, Inc.
# # #
ee
e4
TOWN 0F ~AIL
75 South Frontage Itoad
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
FOR IIVIMED@ATE RELEASE
September 12, 1995
Contact: Paul Reeves, 479-2333
Environmental Health Officer
~EAR SEASON REM9NDER FROM THE TOIIVN OF VA0L
(Vail)--It's bear season again in Vail. And that means paying close attention to the
way you store your garbage, says Paul Reeves, the town's environmental health
officer. "If we make it so the bears can't get to the food, the neighborhood sightings will
be reduced," he said.
Since August, the Vail Police Department has fielded over 20 bear complaints from
the Matterhorn and East Vail areas, according to Reeves. Most of the calls have
involved a mother bear with cubs. The problem has been aggravated this season by
. the lack of berries and other natural foods, say Colorado Division of Wildlife officials.
Therefore, Reeves is asking residents and businesses to do their part in making trash
and garbage inaccessible for the next 8-1.0 weeks. "One of the best and easiest ways
to prevent bears and other animals from getting into your garbage is to delay taking
your trash to the curb until the morning of collection," he said. "We also can provide
tips on bear proofing containers and dumpsters." Second homeowners, especially
those who frequent Vail each weekend, should contact their private waste hauler to
make arrangements for Sunday pickups, he said, or perhaps some vacation property
owners who reside nearby, could consider taking their trash home with them to be
~ (more)
RECYCL6OPAPER
BearsiAdd 1
included with regular trash pickups there. "We understand some of the problems are
being caused by people putting their trash out several days before the regular
collection cycle," Reeves said. "We're asking for voluntary compliance to keep our
neighborhoods safe." '
With funding assistance from the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the town is doing its
part to discourage the presence of bears through the recent placement of five
commercial bear proof containers. Located in Bighorn Park, Ford Park, Pirate Ship
Park and Stephen's Park, the sites were selected based on the frequency of past bear
activity, he said. The containers are designated for park use only.
"While it can be exciting to see a bear, it's a dangerous mix to attract these animals
through our own neglect," said Reeves. "Eventually, someone will get hurt."
For more information on bear proofing efforts, contact Reeves at 479-2333, or Bill
Andree with the Colorado Division of Witdlife at 926-4424.
# # #
S
~d eg
TORW OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
MED9A ADilBSORV
September 11, 1995
Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information Office TOV CONSTRUCTIOIV UPDATE
Here's a brief look at construction in Vail for this week
(Sept. I I - Sept. I5), as provided by the Town of Vail's
new 24-hour recorded information line, 479-2477:
Main Vail Roundabout Construction work at the main Vail roundabout will continue on the south side with
placement of curbs, paving Vail Road, paver sidewalks, irrigation and plant installation.
On the north side, crews will continue with minor grading, irrigation and tree
installation. Expect traffic delays throughout the week. We strongly recommend you
select alternate routes on Beaver Dam and Forest Roads through Crossroads to avoid this area, especially during peak periods. Construction continues Monday through
Saturday, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., with occasional late evening and Sunday work through
the project's duration. B& B Excavating is the project contractor. Town of Vail project
manager is Greg Hall. Hall can be reached at 479-2160.
Matterhorn Street Project
The contractor on the iViatterhorn Street project will continue this week with subgrade
grading and excavation on the west end of Matterhorn. They will also be paving
driveways and roadway on 1Nest Gore Creek Drive. The contractor will be closing
short sections of roadway 100 to 200 feet long for excavation on Matterhorn during this
period. Traffic control will be stationed at either end of the project to direct residents.
Continental West Constructors is the project contractor. The Town's project manager is
Terri Martinez. Her number is 479-2169.
Golf Course Street Project
Work scheduled this week will consist of new utility lines, culvert placement and
adjustment of subgrade on Spring Hill Lane and Sunburst Drive. Concrete curbs will be
placed on Ptarmigan. Paving began on Fairway Circle, Fairway Drive and Ptarmigan
Sat., Sept. 9. Paving continues on Eagle Nest, Hornsilver, Homestake, and Cabin
Circle beginning iVion., Sept. 11. Residents are requested they do not drive over the
concrete for four days following placement. There will be minor traffic delays during the
construction period. The contractor for this project is B&B Excavating. Town of Vail
. project manager is Terri Martinez. Her number is 479-2169.
~ (more)
RECYCLEDPAPER
Construction Update/Add 1
Vail Valley Consolidated Water District
South Frontaae Road Water Line Project
Wor.k continues this week on the water line installation project along South Frontage
Road from the West Vail interchange west into Intermountain with ditch cleanup and
final paving. During the construction period, there will be 10-to 15-minute delays. ' It is
suggested you plan your travel to avoid this area if possible. Vail Valley Consolidated
Water District project manager is Gayle Grider. For any specific questions regarding
this project, please contact her at 476-7480.
South Frontaqe Road Bike Lane (West Vaii)
Work scheduled this week consists of installation of curbs and gutters and the north
side roadway paving. Expect minor traffic delays during construction. The road will be
down to one lane with alternating traffic. The contractor for this project is Western Slope Utilities. The Town of Vail project manager is Jim Weber who can be reached at
479-2344.
Bald Mountain Underpass Project
There will be no work conducted this week. Work will resume the week of Sept. 18 with
grading and concrete slope paving. There may be some traffic delays due to
movement of machinery. The Town of Vail project manager is Jim Weber. His number
is 479-2344.
# # #
~
, . . . Officr aF c}ii, Riiaiyl i,f (_.umtnissioncn . P'a;,+lU {:4311111y Rililding
(970) 318460i 1:0. llox 85(1
}'ax: (97t?j 328 720-i 500 Rmadway
Tf)I):(97(1)32R-K7!Yi , I?agIc,Colondr>NIG.iI-OR5t1
' •f J,.G: h.
EAGI,E COMd'Y, COLORA~~
~~~ORANDUM
TOo AIA Mer9ia and 9nterested Par4ies
FROMa Jeene Deans, Admirtistratide Assistant
DA7Ea September 8, 1995
RE: CHARB~~~ ~O THE AGENDA FOR THE EAL'sLE BOARD
OF CO9JNTY COiVIIVIISSIONERS .
The ffollovving item has been added to the Sep4ember 11, 1995 agenda:
9 030 - 9.45 ae RESOLUT6ON AL1TH0RlZIRlG TFtE BAL~OT QUESTlON
FOR THE EAGLE ~ALLElf L9BRAFtY DIST6tlCT
Library District
ACTaONo Consider approval.
Change 4o the September 11, 1995 agenda:
From:
, .
ZaOO - 2e30 WQRK SESS106V - EAGLE CO@JIVTY REG9OPVAL
AIRPORT FOXED BASE OPERAT90NIS
James Fdtze, Coun4y Attorney
T'o:
2000 go 2e30 . VABL BEAVER CREEK JET CENTER REQUEST FOIZ .
S8'GE APPROVAL OF TERIVIINAL @iVlPROVEMENTS
Craig Colby, !/ail Beaver Creek Jet Genter
-b
Pag9 2
Charages to SepternbeP 11 Agenda ~
Septerrnber 8, 1995
Remove from the Sepfiember 11, 1995 agenda: 4:45 _6:15 WORF( SESSION -GHENT SlTE PLAN APPROVAL FOR
OPTION PROPERTY
Dan Reynolds, Airpor4 Mana.ger
!Y ypu haee any questions p!ease Call 328-8605. cc: Boatd of County Commissioners
,?arnes R. Fri4ze, County Attorney
Allen Saatin, Finance Directar Sara Fisher, CIePk & Recarder
Jack Ings4ad, Public Ingormatian Officer
1d
Uk~- rVA-, q-g•9,5
` - (,~t~u,u1L
' , o ? -
, ~ •,N,,.l, o ~ _ . ' e,,~~ , p~,
~ J. ' Q ` . J . = . . . . iO?11 I ~ o SL ~ .
. ~ 7• j, . , . ~ • _ . ~ ~b
:
. s
, J ~ ~ c• .a ` ~1 • J J'J,. ~ ~ ~
{ ~ . 4.
i I' ~i ~ ,
\
d" ~ ° t'• ~ ro S i ^ ~ ~
' J, a~r, a~. a
~ • ~ o.. ' j ~'.~.r , ~y ~ ,i ~ r r.y
• s` . ,p. , ;~5~' -S`~S , dro v ; o :
~ ' ~ D'_~~ ~ °a ~ _ , '6} . r • ' _ • ' _ ' .~t~
. , . ;
~ "DO YOU EVER (iET 114AT FEELING tHAT 50MEfHING BAD HA510
HAPPERI W OKE YHEY FINfSH THE D0WD JUNCtlON WE PATH?
~