Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-12-19 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session VAIL TOlA/N COUNC9L EVENING MEET'~G TUESDAY, DECENiBER 19, 3995 7:30 P.M. 9N TO!! COIIIdC@L CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. CITIZEIV PARTICIPATIOIV. 2. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 18.39 (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) of the Vail Municipal Code and approving the Deveiopment Plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, 485 Vail Valley DrivelTract F, Vail Village 5th Filing, and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. 3. Ordinance iVo. 25, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance amending Section 18.24.050 (B) of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for eliminating any existing dwelling unit or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor in Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. 4. Appointment of Special Election Judges. 5. Town Council call-up of a PEC approved Conditional Use Permit to allow for a"quasi-public - club" in the Commercial Core I Zone District, to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors of the Serrano's Building, located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Viilage 1 st Filing. Applicant: Glen Heelan, representing Margaretta B. Parks. 6. Town iVlanager's Report. 7. Adjournment. NO'~E UPCONIING MEETBNG S'Td4RT-TInAES BELOW: (ALL TIAAES ARE APPROXIAAATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOVVN COUNCIL REGtJLAR UVORFC SESSION liNELL.BE ON YQ.DESD,4X, 9/2/96, BEGINNINC AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUfVCIL CHAOVIBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL 1'ONVId COUNCIL REGIlLA?R 1A?ORK SESSI09V WELL BE ON TUESD.4V, 1/9/96, BEGINNifVG A'T 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CIiA11ABERS. THE NEXY VAVL TOVUN COUNCIL REGUI.AFi EVENING nAEE71NG WlELL BE ON TC9ESDAY, 1/296, BEGYNIVIIVG AT 7:30 P.M. IN 70!! COUNCIL CHe4NIBERS. I I I I I I I Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. C:\AGENDA.TC l VAUL T01A/N COl91VClL EVENING MEETING T49ESDAV, DECEMBER 19, 1995 7:30 P.M. BN TOV COUNCIL. CF9AIViBERS EXPAIVDED AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEiV PARTICIPATION. 7:35 P.M. 2. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance repealing Jim Curnutte and reenacting Chapter 18.39 (Ski BaselRecreation Zone District) of the Vail Municipal Code and approving the Development Plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, 485 Vail Valley DrivelTract F, Vail Village 5th Filing, and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. 7:45 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance amending George Ruther Section 18.24.050 (B) of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for eliminating any existing dwelling unit or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor in Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance IVo. 25, Series of 1995. BACKGROUIVD RATIONALE: Staff believes that an amendment should be made to Section 18.24.050 (B) to include text requiring a Gonditional Use Permit for any use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor, similar to that which is required for uses on the second floor. Staff believes this amendment should • be made to create consistency within the Zoning Code and to help carry out the intention of the Permitted and Conditional Use Sections of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. A copy of the Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum dated IVovember27, 1995 has been provided for reference. On iVovember 27, 1995, the Town of Vail Community Development Department presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission; the above described amendment. After a lengthy discussion, a motion to recommend approval of the proposed amendment to Town Council was made. The Planning and Environmental Commission voted 4-2 in favor of the recommendation. Planning Commission members Greg Amsden and Dalton UVilliams voted in opposition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels the proposed amendment to Section 18.24.050 (B), will create consistency within the Zoning Code and will help carry out the intention of the Permitted and Conditional Use Sections of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. Staff believes it is the intention of the Zoning Code to permit dwelling or accommodation units to be eliminated above the second floor in the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts to allow for another Permitted or Conditional Use, subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Gliapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code. The proposed amendment wilf ensure that a request to combine or enlarge existing accommodation or dwelling units into one or more units will be reviewed by the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. 8:00 P.M. 4. Appointment of Special Election Judges. Holly McCutcheon 8:05 P.M. 5. Town Council call-up of a PEC approved Conditional Use Permit to allow for Jim Curnutte a"quasi-public club" in the Commercial Core I Zone District, to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors o# the Serrano's Building, located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Glen Heelan, representing Margaretta B. Parks. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold/modify/overturn the Condition al Use Permit approval. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: At the December 5, 1995 Town Council rneeting the Town Council members approved a motion to call-up the PEC approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a"quasi-public club" to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors of the Serrano's Building. The Conditional Use i'ermit request was approved by the PEC on November 27, 1995, by a vote of 5-1. STAFF RECOMIVIENDATION: Uphold the PEC approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a"quasi-public club" on the 3rd and 4th floors of the - Serrano's Building. For more detailed background information on this project please see the attached staff memo'randum to the PEC and meeting minutes for the November 27, 1995 PEC meeting. 8:35 P.M. 6. Town Manager's Report. 8:40 P.M. 7. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIfVIES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHAtdGE) . THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/296, BEGINNIMG AT 2:00 P.M. IPl YOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWIYVG VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE OIV TUESDAY, 1/9/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IYV TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVEiVIiVG MEE7ING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/2196, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUIVCIL CHAMBERS. ' IIIIIII Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 475-2356 TDD for information. C:VIGENDA.TCE - PUBLIC IVOTICE VAIL TOUVfV COUfVCIL MEETING SCHEDULE (as of 12/15/95) JANUARY, 1996 In an attempt to respond to scheduled.meeting demands, as well as adhere to mandated ordinance and charter requirements, Council meetings are scheduled at the following times: EVEN9NC MEETINGS Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each month, starting at 7:30 P.M. These meetings will provide a forum for citizen participation and public audience for conducting regular Council business. lNORFC SESS9OPVS . Work sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues - before the Council, will now be scheduled to begin at 2:00 P.M. (unless otherwise noted) on everv Tuesday afternoon. THE .DAVNUARY. 1996, VAIL TOWN COUNCIL nAEET6NG SCYiEDUL.E IS AS FOLLOWS: Tuesdav, Januarv 2. 1996 Work session............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Evening meeting......... 07:30 P.M. Tuesdav, Januarv 9. 1996 Work session..........., 02:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Tuesdav,Januanr16,1996 Work session............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) . Evening meeting......... 07:30 P.M. Tuesdav, January 23, 1996 Work session............ OZ:OO P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Tuesdav, Januarv 30, 1996 No work session............ (5th Tuesday of the month) TOV1/iV OF VAIL uJ Pamela A. Brandmeyer Assistant Town Nianager Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. , ~~BLIC NOTICE VAYIL TOWN COITI+1CIL MEET'ING Tuesday, December 26, 1995 Work session NO MEETING DUE TO HOLIDAY Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Y * Y TOWN OF VAIL MEMOR.ANDUM TO: Robert McLaurin Council Members FROM: Judy Popeck DATE: November 17, 1995 RE: Investment Report Enclosed is the.investment report with balances as of October 31, 1995. A$2,000,000.00 FHLMC was purchased on October 18, 1995 with a yield of 5.667$ maturing on November 20,1995. A$1,000,000 FHLB was purchased on October 4, 1995 with a yield of 5.683% maturing on November 3, 1995. A$500,000 FHLB was purchased on October 31, 1995 with a yield of 5.611% maturing on December 4, 1995. Al1 of these securities will mature in time for our debt service payment and more capital prajects payments. The estimated average yield for the debt service fund was 5.80% and 6.41% for the pooled cash fund. Currently the yield curve for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year are 5.28%, 5.31%, and 5.25 respectively. Please call me if you have any questions. Town of Vail, Colorado ~ Investment Report Summary of Accounts and Investments For the Month Ending October 31, 1995 Balances Percentage 10/31 /95 of Total ~ Money Nlarket Accounts (see page 1) Commercial Banks $3,054,907 18.48% Money Market Funds $152,841 0.92% Total $3,207,748 19.40% Commercial Savings Banks & Ldans Certificates of Deposit (see page 2) , . Eagle County Institutions 0.00% Other Co!orado Institutions $198,000 $198,000 1.20% National Institutions 0.00% - Total 9 98,000 $198,000 1.20% Percentage of Portfolio in Savings & Loans 0.00% U.S. Govemment Securities (see page 3) Treasury Notes 8 Bills $3,047,532 18.44% GNMA's $72,892 0.44% U.S. Savir.gs Bonds • $29,236 0.18% Federa( Agency Discount Notes & Bonds I $9,974,715 60.34% Total $13,124,375 79 40% Total Portfolio $16,530,123 100.00% , Maturing Within 12 Months $14,410,513 87.18% Maturing Within 24 Months $1,035,775 627% Maturing After 24 Months $1,083,835 6.55% - - - - - - , $16,530,123 100.00% 11/16/95 invsmjlp 10" ~ Money Market Accounts . as of October 31, 1995 -For the Month of October-- Institution Balances Type of Accounts High Low Average 10/31/95 COMiViERCIAL BANK ACCOUNTS First Bank of Vail - Operating Interest 5.395% 4.945% 5.220% Balance $3,839,380 $2,355,873 $2,933,273 $3,051,516 First Bank of Vail - {nsurance Interest 5.395% 4.945% 5.220% Balance $1,078 Colorado Nationat Bank Super Now Account Interest 3.410% General Operating Account Balance $2,313 - - Total Commercial Bank Accounts $3,054,907 MONEY iViARKET FUNDS First American Corp. Trust Treasury Fund Bond Reserve Interest 5.187% Balance $87,924 Bank One flHoney Market Fund Interest 5.231 °lo Balance $59,041 Fidelity Investment Govemment IVloney Marlcet Accounts Interest 5.450% Bond Issue Reserve Account Balance $5,876 - - Total Money fVlarket Funds $152,841 Total all accounts • $3,207,748 "°Account Subjec; to Arbitrage Rebate 11/16/95 ~ invmmjlp Page 1 , Certificates of Deposit as of October 31, 1995 Bank Name, Location Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value - - ~ BestBank, Thomton Colorado FDIC 7.250% 16-Feb-95 16-Feb-97 474 $99,000 Key Bank of Colorado, Greeley Colorado FDIC 6.392% 6.600% 19-Jun-95 19-Jun-96 232 $99,000 Avg Yield 6.925% $i98, 000 11 /16/95 invcdjlp Page 2 Govemment Securities as of Odober 31, 1995 °"Treasury Notes & Bills••• Daysto Days Interest Rate Purchase Maturiry Maturity to Book Par Type Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value TNote Pooled 4.2509b 4.34096 t7-AAay-93 15-May-96 1094 197 $499,749 $500,000 TNote Pooled 6.500% 6.55390 13-Oct-94 30-Sep-96 718 335 $499,768 $500,000 TNMe Debt Service 5.6059b 07-Ju1-94 15-Nov-95 496 15 $1,349,761 $1,350,000 Zero Pooled 7.820% 21-Jun-91 15-Nov-95 1608 15 $698,254 $700,000 Average Yield 6.0695 $3,047,532 $3,050,000 ' Averege Days to Maturity 141 •••GNAAA'S••, V Years to Estimated Interest Rate Purchase Maturi ty Maturity Years to Principal Pool Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding 5803 8.000% 8.48096 14-Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 11.00 $23,534 13003 8.000% 9.500% 24-Od-86 15-Od-06 20.20 12.00 $21,616 14659 8.000°,b 9.200% 240ct-86 15-Jan-07 21.20 13.00 $27,742 Avg Yield 9.057% $72,892 "'U.S. Savings Bonds"' Years to Issue Maturity Maturiry Years to Book Maturity Series Yield Date Date at• Purchase AAaturity Value Value EE 7.170% 01-0ct-86 01-Od-96 10.00 0.92 $29,236 $30,000 '°'Federal Agency Discount Notes & Bonds•,• DayslYears to Interest Rate Purchase P.laturity Maturity Years to Book Maturity Agency Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value Value SBA Pooled - Dana 9.725°•6 26-May-94 25-Mar-2008 13.6 12.4 $94,611 $109,734 FHLM Pooled - Dana 8.400°b 28-Jun-94 01-Mar-2019 24.7 23.3 $57,609 $66,355 FNAAA Pooled - Dana 7.46896 28-Jun-94 01-Oct-2017 23.3 21.9 $82,944 $97,572 FNMA Pooled - Dana 8.431% 29-Jun-94 01-Juh-2014 19.9 18.6 $76,678 $110,531 SBA Pooled - Dana 10.225°•b 29-Jun-94 25-Feb-2008 13.7 12.3 $71,051 382,749 SBA Pooled - Dana 9.475% 29-Jun-94 25-Jun-2019 25.0 23.7 $98,348 $108,523 SBA Pooled - Dana 10.225% 18-Aug-94 25-Ju1-2008 13.9 12.7 $90,729 $109,875 SBA Pooled - Dana 10.22596 29-Jun-94 25-Jan-2008 13.6 12.2 $83,831 $110,088 FNMA Pooled - Dana 7.090% 27-May-94 01-May-2020 25.9 24.5 $79,226 $100,577 FHLMC Pooled - Dana 7.807% 28-Aug-94 01-Aug-2018 23.9 22.8 $73,680 $74,245 SBA Pooled - Dana 9.725% 12-Ju1-94 25-Jun-2019 25.0 23.7 $103,427 $108,744 SBA Pooled - Dana 9.475°,6 08-May-95 25-Dec-2019 24.6 24.2 $98,809 $99,391 FNMA Debt Service 6.912°b 27-Feb-95 17Jan-97 1.9 1.2 $283,058 $280,000 FNPAA Pooled 6.51295 22-Feb-95 17-Nov-95 268.0 Days $498,578 $500,000 FHLB Pooled 5.68296 04-Od-95 03-Nov-95 30.0 Days $999,689 $'i,ppp,ppp FNMA Pooled 6.03796 16-May-95 14Nov-95 182.0 Days $997,855 $1,000,000 FHLB Pooled 6.749% 02-Mar-95 02-Aug-96 1.4 Days $753,462 $750,000 FHLMC Pooled 6.789% 27-Mar-95 23-Aug-96 1.4 Days $740,189 $750,000 FHLMC Pooled 5.667% 18-Oct-95 20-Nov-95 33.0 Days $1,994,117 $2,000,000 FHLB Pooled 5.611% 31-Oct-95 04-Dec-95 34.0 Days $497,476 $500,000 FHl.B Pc:,ied 6.370% 27-Mar-95 16-Jan-96 295.0 Days $345,494 $350,000 FHLB Pooled 6.600% 31-Mar-95 10-May-96 1.1 Days $700,137 $700,000 FFC Pooled 5.79496 27-Jun-95 28-Apr-97 . 1.8 1.5 $653,717 $650,000 FHLM. Pooled 4.560% 4.560% 03-Jun-93 03-Jun-96 3.0 Days $500,000 $500,000 $9,974,715 $10,158,384 Avsrage Yield 6.34% Averege Years to Maturity 10 7ctai $13,124,375 11/16/95 ' invtrjlp Page 3 PLANNBNC AND ENVIROIVMENTAL COAAnA9SSlON December 18, 1995 . AGENDA Project Orientation / Lunch 0 . Si4e Visits Public Hearina 2:00 p.in. HI 'to " T MEETING HAS BEEN ANCELLED F:\eve"ryone\pec\agendas\111395 1 . 7 ORD9NANCE N0. 25 SER9ES OF 1995 A,N ORD9NAiVCE AMENDING SECT90N 18.24.050 (B) OF THE iUillNiCIPAL CODE OF l'EiE T01NN OF VAIL., SET`GGN(s', FOf3TF9 NEW PROCEDdJRES FOR ELIIVIINATING a41VY EXBSTBNG DWELLaRIG Q.DNIT OR ACCOMMODATION l1NIT OFi ANY PORT90N THEREOF ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR BB\9 COflfiMERCBAL CORE 8 AND COMMERCBAL COFiE BS ZOIVE DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the Town Council believes the following amendment will create more consistency within the zoning code and help to carry out the intentions of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Code II Zone Districts; WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the amendment; WHEREAS, the Town Council believes it has been the intention to require Planning and Environmental Commission review of a proposal to eliminate an existing dwelling unit or accommodation unit or any portion thereof to another Permitted or Conditional Use, subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Town Council believes the proposed amendment will insure that a request to combine or enlarge existing dwelling or accommodation units into one or more units will be reviewed by the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO that: 1. Section 18.24.050 Permitted and conditional uses - Above second floor. A. The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above gracie: 1. Multiple-family residential dwellings; 2. Lodges. B. The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in , accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60. Any perrnitted or ; v.~ 11 11 conditionalFuse~which eliminates any existing,;tlweUing o,r accommodatio,n ~u urnt;~or any portron thereof, shall reguire a:Conditional~Use-Permit: _Such uses may include: 1. Retail stores and establishments, including the following: Apparel stores, . Art supply stores and galleries, Bakeries and confectioneries, restricted to preparation of products specifically for sale on the premises, Bookstores, Camera stores and photographic studios, Chinaware and glassware stores, Delicatessens and specialty food stores, Drugstores, Fforists, Gift shops, Hobby stores, , 1 Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1995 ~ rl ~i. -w Jewelry stores, ' Leather goods stores, Luggage stores, Music and record stores, Newsstands and tobacco stores, Photographic studios, Stationery stores, Toy stores, Variety stores, Yardage and dry goods stores, Liquor stores, Radio and TV stores and repair shops, Sporting good stores ~ 2. Eating and drinking establishments, including the following: Bakeries and delicatessens with food service, restricted to preparation of products specifically for sale on the premises, Cocktail lounges and bars, Coffee shops, Fountain and sandwich shops, Restaurants; 3. Professional offices, business offices, and studios; 4. Banks and financial institutions; I . 5. Personal services and repair shops, including the following: Barbershops, Beauty shops, Business and office services, Small appliance repair shops, Tailors and dressmakers, Travel and ticket agencies; 6. Theaters; 7. Additional uses determined to be similar to iermitted uses described in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of this section in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.040, so long as they do not encourage vehicular traffic; 8. Reserved; "9. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060; ##1~9. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.0 I70. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of ti e remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. i 2 Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1995 0 ~ ~ 3. The ~wn Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the'Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. IItlTlf'~~DUCGDy RGADy G'9PPROVIGD, L`1ND ORDGRED PVBLIJ1-IGD o1MCG IEtl If"ULL oEV FBRST RE,4D9NG this 19th day of December, 1995, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 2nd day of January, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk r READ AND APPROVED ON SECOiVD READIiVG AND ORDERED PUBLISHED in full this day of , 1996. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD9525 3 Ordinance No. 25, Series ot 1995 9 o~~~~ANcE No. aa SerAes of 1995 AN ORD9N`4NCE REPEAL9NG d4ND RE-EN9ACTING CFIAPTER 18.39, SlC9 BASE/RECREAT@ON DISTR@CT OF THE VAIL flAflJNICOPAL CODEe WHEREAS, Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Nlunicipal Code describes the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District; and WHEREAS, Vail Associates, Inc. has submitted an application to amend Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of the amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend said Chapter of the Municipal Code. IVOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIIVED BY THE TOWN COUiVCIL OF THE TOWtV OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Cliapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby repealed and re-enacted to read as follows: 18.39.010 Purpose. The Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District is intended to provide for the base facilities necessary to operate the ski mountain and to allow multi-family residential dwellings as . a secondary use if certain criteria are met. In addition, summer recreational uses and facilities are encouraged to achieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and provide for efficient use of the facilities. 18.39.030 Permitted uses. A. The following uses shall be permitted within the main base lodge building in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District: 1. Ski lockers/employee locker rooms. 2. Ski school and ski patrol facilities. 3. Lift ticket sales. 4. Tennis pro shop. 5. Ski repair, rental, sales and accessories. 6. RestauranUbar/snack bar/candy sales. . ~ 7. Sum~-ar seasonal recreational, cultural and educational programs and offices. 8. Meeting rooms for owner use and community-oriented organizations. 9. Injury prevention and rehabilitation facilities for owners' use. ~ 10. Basket rental 11. Special community events. B. Retail and meeting room space limitation. 1. Retail sales space in the first two floors shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen percent of the non-residential gross square footage of the main base lodge building. Under Section 18.39.030, retail shall be defined as tennis pro shop, candy sales, ski repair/rental sales, accessories and clothing, basket rental, ski lockers and storage for the public. 2. Meeting rooms shall be limited to a maximum of ten percent of the non-residential • gross square footage of the main building. C. Multi-family dwelling units within the main base lodge building if the following requirements are met: 1. The dwelling units shall be a secondary use within the main base lodge building if they meet the following criteria: a. No residential use on ground level. b. Visual impacts such as surface parking for the dwelling units shall be minimized by providing at least forty percent of the required parking within the main base lodge building or in an attached parking structure. c. The maximum gross residential floor area (GRFA) devoted to dwelling units shall not exceed thirty percent of the total gross square footage of the main base lodge building. 2. Before acting on multi-family dwelling units, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors in regard thereto: a. Relationship and impacts of the use on development objectives of the town. b. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportatian facilities, utilities, schools, parks, and recreational facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. c. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and I pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, i~ d maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. d. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. . 3. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the findings set forth in Section 18.60.060 B before permitting multi-family units within the main base lodge building. D. Permitted uses within the Children's Ski School building: 1. Year-round child care and children's ski school and appurtenant recreational , facilities and programs. 2. Children's ski school services and programs. 3. Community events and programs. 4. Summer recreational, cultural and educational programs. E. The following uses shall be permitted outside the main base lodge and Children's Ski School buildings as shown on the approved development plan: 1. Ski trails, slopes and lifts; 2. Snowmaking facilities; 3. Bus and skier dropoff; 4. Surface parking lot; 5. Ski racing facilities; 6. Public parks, tennis and volleyball courts, and playing fields, playgrounds; 7. Water-treatment and storage facilities buildings; 8. Mountain storage buildings; 9. Ski school activities; 10. Special community -events; 11. Food and beverage service;. 12.. Indoor and outdoor ski storage. 18.39.050 Conditional uses. A. The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60: 1. Recreation room/minor arcade. 2. Addition or expansion of storage buildings for mountain equipment. ~ . 3. Sum ==ar outdoor storage for mountain equipment. 4. Redevelopment of water storage extraction and treatment facilities. 5. Redevelopment of ski racing facilities. 6. Redevelopment of public parks, playgrounds. 7. Summer seasonal community offices and programs. 8. Additions or expansions of public or private parking structures or spaces. 9. Seasonal structures to accommodate athletic, cultural, or educational activities. 10. Redevelopment of ski lifts and tows. 11. Food and beverage cart vending. 12. Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 18.58.810. 13. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. 14. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. 15. Public, private or quasi-public clubs. 18.39.070 Accessory Uses The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District: A. Accessory uses customarily incidental to permitted and conditional uses and necessary for the operation thereof. B. Home occupations, subject to the issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. 18.39.080 Location of business activity. A. All offices and retail sales conducted in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building except for approved special events and food and beverage vending. 18.39.090 Development plan required. A. To ensure the unified development, the protection of the natural environment, the compatibility with the surrounding area and to assure that development in the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District will meet the intent of the district, a . development plan shall be required. B. The proposed development plan shall be in accordance with Section 18.39.110 and shall be submitted by the developer to the zoning administrator, who shall refer it to the Planning and Environmental Commission, which shall consider the plan at a regularly scheduled meeting. A report of the Planning and a 0 Envi-,=-:nmental Commission stating its findings and recommendations shall be transmitted to the town council for approval in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code. C. The approved development plan shall be used as the principal guide for all development within the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District. D. Amendments to the approved development plan will be considered in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.40.100. E. The development plan and any subsequent amendments thereto shall require the - approval of the design review board in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 18.54 of the Municipal Code prior to the commencement of site preparation. 18.39.110 Development Plan - Contents The following information and materials shall be submitted with an application for a proposed development plan. Certain submittal requirements may be waived or modified by the Director of the Department of Community Development if it is demonstrated that the material to be waived or modified is not applicable to the review criteria, or that other practical solutions have been reached. A. Application form and filing fee. B. A written statement describing the project including information on the nature of the development proposed, proposed uses, and phasing plans. C. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions.of the properry to be included in the development plan, including the location of improvements, existing contours, natural features, existing vegetation, water courses, and perimeter properry lines of the parcel. D. A title report, including schedules A and B. E. Plans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations, . etc.), if applicable. F. A complete zoning analysis of the existing and proposed development including a square footage analysis of all proposed uses, parking spaces, etc. i u , G. A sitE plan at a scale not smaller than 1= 20i, showing the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, all principal site development features, vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems and proposed contours and drainage plans. H. Building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than 1/8" = 1', in sufficient detail to determine floor area, circulation, locafion of uses and scale and appearance of the proposed developmeni. 1. A vicinity plan showing existing and proposed improvements in relation to all adjacent properties at a scale not smaller than 1" = 50'. J. Photo overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for demonstrating the visual impact of the proposed development on public and private property in the vicinity of the proposed development plan. K. An architectural or massing model at a scale sufficient to depict the proposed development in relationship to existing development on the site and on adjacent parcels. L. A landscape plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', sh i wing existing iandscape features to be retained and removed, proposed landscap~ing and other site development features such as recreation facilities, paths and trails, plazas, walkways and water features. M. An Environmental Impact Report in accordance with Chapter 18.56, unless waived by Section 18.56.030. N. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Director of the Community Development Department. I With the exception of the model, four complete copies of the abo;ve information shall be submitted at the time of the application. When a model is required, it shall be submitted a minimum of two weeks prior to the first formal review of the Plalnning and . Environmental Commission. At the discretion of the Director of Community Development, reduced copies in 8.5" x 11" format of all of the above information and additional copies for distribution to the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council may be required. 0 0 18.39.120 DevF! ;-pment Standa rds/C rite ria for evaluation. The following criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria. 1. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. 2. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. 3. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, provide adequate buffering between the proposed uses and surrounding properties, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. 4. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and aesthetically pfeasing circulation to the site and throughout the development. 5. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the. project's Environmental Impact Report, if not waived, and ali necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the proposed development plan. 6. Compliance with The Vail Comprehensive Plan and other applicable plans. 18.39.130 Lot area. The minimum lot or site area shall be forty acres of site area, at least one acre of which shall be buildable area. 18.39.150 Setbacks. In the Golden Peak Ski Base/Recreation District, front, side, rear and stream setbacks , shall be as indicated on the approved development plan. 18.39.170 Height. - Up to sixty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be built to a height of thirty-five feet, or less. No more than forty percent of the building (building coverage area) may be higher than thirty-five feet, but not~higher than forty feet. Towers, spires, cupolas, chimneys, flagpoles, and similar architectural features not useable as gross ~ residential f.t~,r area may extend above the height limit a distance of not more than twenty-five percent of the height limit nor more than fifteen feet. 18.39.180 Density Control. Total density shall not exceed one dwe(ling unit per eight acres of site area. 18.39.190 Site coverage. Site coverage shall be as shown on the approved development plan. 18.39.210 Landscaping and site development. . Landscaping requirements shall be as shown on the approved development plan. All areas within the area(s) of disturbance in the landscape plan notI occupied by build'ong, ground level decks or patios, or parking shall be landscaped. 18.39.230 Parking Plan and Program Parking Plan and Management Program shall be as shown on and described in the approved development plan. Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passedl this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection; sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violatiori that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. I F a Section 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. IiVTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READIIVG, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IRI FULL, this 5th day of December, 1995. A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, on the 19th day of December, 1995, in the Nlunicipa! Building of the Town. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk IIVTRODIJCED, READ, ADOPTED AIVD ENACTED OIV SECOiVD READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE OiVLY) THIS DAY OF , 1995. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk ORD24.95 (aolden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment. Conditions of Approvaf At the December 5, 1995 Town Council meeting, the Town Council determined that the following conditions should be attached to the approval of the Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment application. , 1. Priar to the Town's issuance of any Building/Grading/Demolition Permits for the redevelopment, the applicant shall be required to enter into an agreement with the Town. This agreement will specify the obligations of the Town of Vail and Vail Assoeiates as they relate to the Golden Peak redevelopment, i.e., transfer of easernents, details on cost sharing, establishment of the Golden Peak Operational Management Plan Assessment Committe, etc. . 2. The Town of Vail and Vail Associates agree that the 148-space parking siructure is an integral component of this project, and that it will be constructed as an element of the Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment. It is also acknowledged that the construction of the parking structure may begin in the 1997 construction season. If any Certificafe of Occupancy for the redevelopment is requested, and the parking structure is not completed, the Town will request that the applicant provide sufficient collatoral to insure its completion at a later date. 3. Staff is directed to prepare a memorandum to the Design Review Board identifying - the PEC and Town Council's concerns with the project and requesting that the DRB focus their review on the following issues: * The roof material used on the mechanical covering/architectural element should be the same material as used on the remainder of the building roof area. This covering should be mounted on posts so that it is 6"-12" above . the flat roof surface. ' Building colors, materials and details * Landscaping, site details and materials * Design of the Mill Creek Circle plaza will be reviewed with regard to increased landscaping, screening of the telephone utility box, and final design. Children's Center parking lot and sidewalk design * Comprehensive sign program • 4. The final streetscape/roadway/bus lane construction designs must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works and Community Development Departments prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the project. ' 5. The sidewalk proposed on the east side of Vail Valley Drive, the sidewalk from the Children's Center to the soccer field, and a pedestrian connection to the Ford Park parking lot shall not be considered to be a part of the Golden Peak redevelopment plans and wiil not be constructed in conjunction with the Golden Peak improvements. 6. The Environmental Impact Report must be revised/updated and approved by the Town, including the Mill Creek Geological Hazard Analysis, prior to the issuance of a Bui(ding Permit for the project. 7. The aisle widths in the Children's Center parking lot will be reevaluated by the Town of Vail staff and the applicanYs representatives in an effort to provide a sidewalk of acceptable width, including landscape screening and retaining wall design. The final design is subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board. 8. The appficant will complete construction of the Vail Trail extension from its current terminus, located behind the Children's Center,.to the western edge of the Vail Associates property prior to the issuance of a Temporary I Certificate of Occupancy - for the base lodge facility. The design of this trail must beI reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 9. The design of the seasonal tent, proposed to be located near the ski race course finish area, must be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to its placement on the property. 10. A comprehensive sign program for all on and off-site signage in the area of Golden Peak must be reviewed and approved by the Desi6n Review Board prior to ihe issuance of a Building Permit for the project. 11. Section VI (B) of the Golden Peak Operational Management Plan (DEVO/Local and Community Programs) shall be amended to read as fi Ilows: Tier II. In the event that some or all of the Tier I techniques have been implemented and DEVO still adversely impacts portal congestion then ihe following successive management efforts will be undertak'en in the next ski season or Peak Period: 1. DEVO will be relocated in part or in whole to other Vail Mountain portals, ' ~ ~dM ~I;.JLJLJLI~o O~UU 416 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE PHONE (970) 476-5646 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 FAX (970) 476-0301 December 19, 1995 Vail Town Council 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, C0. 81657 Dear Town Council Members Over the course of the last two years we have been involved in discussions with Vail Associates and the East Village Homeowners Association regarding the Development Plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base. In general, those discussions have been productive and informative. As the project is reaching its final stages of approval, we are pleased with the overall appearance of the building. It appears that it will blend both from a mountain and residential standpoint. In our support of the project, one of the elements that we were pleased to see proposed, was an underground parking structure with surface landscaping. This we felt would in general enhance the appearance of the development and area. Of recent days, however, we are advised of discussion that the parking structure may not be built or that fees may be considered payment in lieu of parking. Please understand that a portion of our support for this project was the benefit of underground rather than surface parking. Although we can understand the desire to pre sell spaces to off- set construction costs, we do not favor the pay in lieu of parking alternative. Further, if the structure cannot be built, we would request that the space be restrict-ed to green space only. This is what we anticipated our view corridor would consist of with the landscaping proposed for the structure area. .r ~ Vail Town Council Page 2 A second matter of concern is the signage issue. Although studies suggest that the vehicular traffic impact may not increase significantly, there is no question that Vail Valley Dr. will realize a noticeable increase in traffic. We ask that the Vail Town Council, in its discussions with Vail Associates, provide for adequate electronic signage at the Golden Peak Ski Base as well as on Frontage Road that would minimize unnecessary traffic flow on Vail Valley Dr. In particular if no parking is available, cars should be directed elsewhere prior to coming down the Blue Cow Chute. We are optimistic that these issues wili be addressed in the final approvals of the Development Plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base. Sincer2LII-II -4 ely ~ /t/ Niels W. Johnsen, President Rams Horn Condominium Association NWJ/dlm i-a, aZO lnL- ll:lb r~ OU~L6.7rJUJ 13KYAtr iiHU'1'fiElCS, INC 002 C 'n e JOHN R,~~~OLPH HvTrc~~S13N ~ 5598 FAl.Pd90UT}1 S7'REEq. SUITE 903 RICHAkOPlB. VIRGINtA 23230 ~ TELEPF4ONE BQ4f288-= P.O. 60XX 123¢3 FAX 0 8940545@3 RIpHAROfdD, VA 73203 %December g4 a 1995 1K~ers of Towsa Cauncil The Tows'n of Vail 17 r7 e 1C iontage JCloa6d p WeS b - ilagl p Co 81637 . Dear Coaancil Neuberso As a long time awner ag Maraor Vail g.odge xwoulcl Yike ta express my concern and displeasure at the suggested closireg of the existinq pedestrian crossing from Manar Vaal to Golden Peak> This pedestrian crossing has beera in existence for a number of yeax's and has wogked in tae pasto My concesns areo b. People will nnt wallt to the proposed new north or scuth csossings, but rather, wall climb acrass the berm and "jaywalk90 to ghe opposate side og the street e 2. Visibality froan the new proposed crossings is no better than . thhe vbsability fgom the existirag crmssings o 3. The road cannot be wadened enaugh to elaminate the visability problemso Perhaps a11 0f the concexns, goe<, liabilgtyo visibilityo etcoe woaabd be better serred ig the eaeisting crosswalk were made more vasible with increased signage, and a painted crasseaalko . I hope that you wibl consider oiar opinions on this i?atter before votinq on this pgojecta Sincerely, CRohx~ R~dolph Htatcheson assie Caa-tes Iiutcheson Unbt 215-16-17 JRH/bb cC S Vagg AuSoc1atS6 p g87C. p Ddvld CDrbl41 East vlblage Hmmeowners ASSOCiation, J1ffi Lamont . ~ RECEIVED DEC 1 9 1995 I think before the Golden Peak Expansion is approved, the town council should iake a closer look at the overall future and consequances of this expansion. Why is Vail Associates pumping twenty seven million - dollars into an oversized Beaver Creek facade development praject? For every potential ski facility development within the towns limits, including the redevelopment of Lionshead~ that Vail Associates in' the future takes on, always to be on the level af promethean, exorbitant, exclusive, and proportionally unfit to the area. This is not Beaver Creek nor do we need a second Beaver Creek. Who asked Vail Associates to develop this exclusive, massive project with private parking? I do not know of anybody in town or visitors that view Golden Peak today and proclaim w+e need eighty three thousancf square feet of exclusive ski facility property in the Town of Vail along with twro and five million dollarcondominiums on top, pnvate parking, valet service,a ten thousand square foot restaurant ( with food prices to go aiong with thesquarefooiage),asmallerrestawrantdownstairs,andprivatelockerfacilitiesalllocked inforthirty exclusive years. What the normal , logical skier, snowboarder, resident, non-resident, would like to see is a quaint down size rebuitd of Golden Peak. Along with a new ticket office, ski tockers, restaurant or restaurants, locker storage, shop, and parking passes.comparable io the Town of Vails, and the new ski lift -yes, always a plus. Vail Associates is dealing with an inexperienced town council and is woang the council and area citizens in attracting the town to their vote by promoting the parking facility. If they do not 'sell. all parking exclusivity, and possible have to revert back to ten dotlar a day parking, then what Idnd of traffic problems will the town and area residents be faced with in the future. Beaver Creek rode on the same philosophy of exclusivity, they are so exclusive, why is theirtrack homes on the golf course, tfie biggest eyssore of Beaver Creeks future. I Eric Windisch made it this far with the Golden Peak building, anything would be an improvement. Eric said he used to store his skis in the boiler room well now he will have eighty three thousand square feet of storage including underground parking to store skis. This is skiing mentality and not golf course mentality, there is a big difference. - Town council look into another roundabout by the Tyrolean Inn Restaurant, as you will have a honendous traffic problem accumulating, for any intelligent logical minded and sane person knows that Vail Associates will never be able to sell these exclusive parking places and this proposal is asnoke screen for their own controlled parking for skier numbers in the next thirty years. Think don't get caught up in the illusion of exclusivity. Lisa Zmmermann i . ' a 4 gz 1 MEMO 12/13/95 TO: The Town of Vail, Colorado Town Council/(970) 479-2157 FROM: Stephen Schutz, Owner Northwoods Condominium Unit F-8 Fax (619) 454-6745/Voice Mai1 (619) 456-2336 COPY TO: East Village Homeowners Association Fax (970) 827-5856 and Northwood Condoninium Property Owners Representative, Tim Lamont, via Mrs. Brinkman By Federal Express I recently studied the Vail Valley Drive streetscape plan as it was published in a flyer by the East Village Homeowners , Association. I realized that although a lot of attention has been addressed to traffic congestion, the streetscape plan does not fully address pedestrian traffic and could lead to a dangerous situation. A large number of parents with children will be left off by the bus at the curved driveway in front of the proposed Golden Peak Base facility.(The bus stop is not marked on the streetscape plan, however, that is the obvious location for it). In order to get to the children's ski school many parents and children will enter the base facility, walk upstairs, exit the base facility on the other side and walk around back down the hill to the children's ski school. However, some of the parents and children will decide to take the sidewalk, which is a more direct route. This will require that they walk across a private driveway and around a sidewalk bordering Vail Valley Drive. During peak hours some pedestrians will inevitably walk onto the road. It turns out that this sidewalk is located along a curved area of Vail Valley Drive where the likelihood of skidding cars is greatly increased. This could lead to a dangerous situation. There is a very simple solution to this problem that does not involve any change in plans of buildings or driveways. The solution would be to build a pedestrian ramp over the private ' driveway that enters the Golden Peak facility. Presumably the planned driveway would enter the base facility below street level which would enable a ramp to traverse the driveway only slightly above the street level. This would necessitate some reduction in the landscaping in that area but would provide an additional path for pedestrians to walk in the direction of the ski school without walking on the sidewalk bordering the Vail Valley Road. I plead with you to consider the addition of this pedestrian walkway to accommodate the enormous pedestrian traffic that will result from the increase in "up mountain" capacity at the site. Please do not wait until someone is killed on that dangerous curve before you decide to add an additional pedestrian walkway. ~ . . . . . . . , . • . ' . . .•r: ' . . ~ ' . . ' ~ . . . ,r; . r. . ' . ' • ' . . . ' ~ . . . . . ~ _ ' • ' . . ' , , r t+,' ~ . , . . ~ ' ~ , ;':~I'. ~{~}r~.,i' 7, , . . ' , . . . , , . . ,1.. ' . . , . ~ . . ~ i - . ~ . ' . ~ . : . ~ ' . _ . . . . . a' ~ ~ , . , ' . . . i . . . . ' . . . . • ' , .l' . ' . , ' , , . . . " . . ` . . 1 • l . . nxitx USAAZrbZll: N~mti. 8 420,0 7 08.16 .N~ ~Rec ip e inrs CopV.;s~'~~ , from _ _ . S8fTI1C6U.6nncommronmtmqMlanrm~onnmu • Date 1 _ , FedEx Prioriry Ovemi9ht FedEx Standerd Ovemieht ? I~~, ...f . ~ , R~.uwrin.umormiq~ . ?a.nmdn.n.lbmoon~ ~a ~ ~•,•F''^~ i l FedF~t Govf, Ovemi8ht • ~ Sender's ~ f 1 I Name onq) ? ` ' wriei>nux ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;t°.,• • ~ Phone~~ ~FedExOvemightFreiBM• ?fedEz2Deykeipht ' i •i ` ` f ~ . Cep ~ i f/$IftjR001i1' I' Ir„ Wck.puarM 150f" LNMry~eMEW.I-J ~ ''r ~ UBpt/PDo ~ CGmPeoY y~ NEW Fid6FfiEdOve ~ , i t • ; ~ ~ - , . ^ (6rkamiaEus'u~o"~~pyr~l~i~ , . 'HdFa4MrR~a~miiv.OWb tOp4ct loutloni) M~ • ~ ~I " I: (MhlwrmtpPlry OmWoneiN4inbwm 7Dqcnr~h. Address ( , P ping f) s rs . . . . . i. . Lad ~ ~ ~ e~ C~.~~ , ? FedEx, ~o Little - • 9mc r Tuba i Peckapop n.a.~a'.iw cma I State ~p Your Internal Billing Reterence Information', , , . Special HsridUnp 3i T. . aotei~~dua~o~isu0odrt t :,1 ? Yes Rec ft.n s % v " ; ' ' , • . • i i ~ Dry ke ~~,s n v t . a,-± , ~ ` ~ ti' J •-r ~ onka.4'urr in ~ , ~ • A . ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ ; ~w,a.,w. s~'~ww~.oa~~a ?a . , , ~v , { i ~ . ~ ~ r•y . r , o.xMoQys,~oon, 1!ei?me - " i- ,7, Obtam Recipfem C0f"DenY j .Pe~ FedEx Account Mo ~ KB;~a u~~+~~. ~]Haelp~rrt"' ; I v f ,.em~~.ra QTh6dM, ~Ged'4Cerd El Caslp ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ fEnw hdFx ~cewm no. ei Gedh C~N ro MbMj~ ' • ~ ~ GIeCk I 1 Address ' ~ . . • ~ 1 M., ~ , 'ti~ ~ ~ /~1, , ` . ~ 1~ .i t . . • J: ~S~', . ~ ~ 'i Q. _ y , .c' ~ ` Ro'HOID' u FadFx locatlpn, print FedEv eddwu Aara) ~ 1`. ! 1•, , uv s~~ z~ 1 t < ] r~~,,, ~ ~HO ~wn cn~k aere Hob W~ F@dElt ? Had searoao eturdep Delivero check hero Tofd le~d Ya~~'. N . i a.ei.n roo~ J ~ IF,o-. cn.ry. Ha wailaeM m ~ekc.uan) ' • ' ~IMatmkbhwahfidEa'FmtOrvr~imipAU . , ~ mi4hMrMFelFaFrt 'NTeiMelpiq~nMnhblyrNentlW ~ r.a~, sm~a„a o..~w , ; ~amoiat oeo~ raueiuir ~ . ~ aea~"ran~a«i,n~.mm ~udAl~~ ~ . . , r. ~ ~ f ~ , , , ~ 4~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j 7 f ~i8f8886 e~16~jfl0~UP8 I : ~ ~ i"~ a r, I . ~ . I +Ca . ~ • e4200 11 oe~e ~,r!~~ ~ ;`y ~t~.• `<<~ , , . . ~ tYas upnowra lmhaame isMnl Ewntt m d~8ror tld~ ~hip. f~" ' ~ ~ m~MMUaROMaMipa nwm~M ' , a .~~~~~.~~.~to` 232 c,~FOHMIDNO. 8w. Dm N85 • PA(1T #la7ei i ~ " m~991~~f~AEe•VRINiE01NU.5A GBiE I1/06 e ~ 7 i . . . . ' ~ . ~ . . . . . ' . ' ~ , f~(~ o SENT BY:Xerou Telecopier 7020 ;12-18-95 0 3:26PM o GOULD/BRT/M RJESTIC-o 3034792157;8 1 YtIC H. uLD 60 cU7TETt Mru. RnADi, SUr7'E 303 G&eqT AIECIC. NBW YORK 11021 . December 18, 1995 cs~~ 0a.3100 _ vfm gax 990-474-2157 Tsa.scoPIEa 0 (516) 466-302 Members of Tawn Cotaacil ~ . Z'pae Tawn of ilai1 17 Se Frosstage Road, Weat VafJl, CO 81657 Deffir Coune$l Mfembegffis . I grecentIy pr,arcriased a u'ngg gn Famor F/ail %,odge and iwould 1ika to-express my ' coneern agad displeastars at the suggested closing of the exiating gsedestrian ; cro~sing from M$xtor 11a41 ga Goldea2 PmLko This pede9tr4an eroaaitlg 2ias beesa in ~ exigtence ior ffi saiambag of years aaad it,was as8tmd that it would continue ta be opeaa forsveg a i My eoxaceans age e 1. People wfll nOg walh ta the prapoeed ttew north or mout}a cros • I sings0 but ~ rather, will c11mb acrarbo the beam and "jsywalk1P to ithe opposite sfds of the - streete b o Visibil3fiy $rom the aaew proposed crossings is aaot better than the visibilifiy ~ from the exigta.rxg crossfaagoe . I 3e Z'he goad canaaog be wbdened enough to eliminate the visiblli$y problemsa , Perhaps a1l of the conce$°gasa f.e.o liabflityn visibalftgve otcoo wou1d be better . ~erved if t$1e exfstinffi cgos$walk were made mora rrfsible wfth iaacreamed si8nageD and a pffiinted crossva].k, I ~ Ihop~ that yau wall considgY oux opinions osa this aaatter befare vating on thfm I. prco j ect o fnc ~1 a . ~ r c ota1~ e • . i. c co ilail Assocf esD %snc, - David CArbiaa (Fs$ 970-845m2555) Exsg Village Homeawrlera Anaociation ~ Jim Lamoat (Fax 970-827-5956) r. ' • f I . ; 6• _ . i 12-18.-95 12:49 PM FROM JR HANSEN-BP HANSEN TO 3034792157 PO1 ' ,r .IULIAN R. H/?NSEN ATTORIrEv AT uAW P.o.eiUx 1117; HA1tHWGTON.ILLINO15tNx?11 7Wiw:fl11 4a40 FILEe VIA FACSIMILE N0. 970-479-2157 December 18, 1995 . . ~ Town af vail Council Gentlemen: Regarding the Golden Peak Redevelopment Plan (1995) the undersigned, as a long time owner (1965) in the A11 Seasons Condominium, request the Council to: IL. Take whate..er action is required (deed restriction, zoning . prohibition) to ensure that surface parking 's eliminated now and prohibited in the future on the proposed landscaped areas.of Golden Peak; 2. Not delete Section 18.39.75 (Prohibited Uses) unless other code sections clearly and specifically prohibit the enumerated uses; and 3. Provide a reasonable time notification to adjoining owners of any proposed change considered by the zonilng administrator under seC. 18.39.090 D and provide a simple hearing process if the ovvners file,a written objection to the proposed change. The undersigned enthusiastically endorses the Golden Peak Redevelopment,Plan with the above changes. . ve tru y your L~ ian R. Hanse cc: Jim Lamqnt Al1 Seasons Condominium Department of Community Development e:\wp60\epc\vail.ltr ~ I d DEC-18-95 SUN 07:54 PM CAULKINS 3033888418 P.01 , '°oe ''°own of ilail- ~'owea Coc~nci8 De~° ~ ~s ~ 995 Fromo E61ae Caulkans 304 Milf Creek. Circle , Vai~ 81657 Ree 9 995 Golden Peak dtedeveloprnent PBan - D am concemed about the TOV°s proposed changes to the zonirag da~trict regula$+ons of1985e Ut seenns that it woutd be an act of bad faeth to remove 9ong-standing "Prohibited uses°° as stated in the covenants which were mutually agreed upoaa 6ay Vail Associates, the Town of @laiV and neighborhood property ouvnerse A9soy d vvouPd apprecoate your providing public notice and conducting public hearangs 6f there are any proposed atterations in the development pBan9 rather $han $he gown's zoning admanistrator acting in that rolea Additionalty9 d feeB that at would be appropriate to inc9ude the affected neighborhood or ets represeratative in the process of se6ecting the argwork to be 9ocated at the Mill Creek CircPe p0aza/park> The 6nc9usion of streetscape improvements and stone entrance py9oaas and sa9nage $o further diseourage non-resodent parkung9 s9cier dPOp_mff and non-essential traffic ara Mi8( Creek Circle are much apprecoateda Wili there be assurances that the stated landscaping w61G be comp9eted? 8@ook'foa-ward $o the success of thds we6e-conceaved pa-ojecto B am gratefaa8 for the regular inforrnation receaved during the plann6ng process ancd welcoene cont6nuing cornanunication as at moves forwarde Thank yoaa very muc9ao ~ DEC-14-95 THU 12:29 PM MANOR VAIL LODGE FAX N0. 9704764982 P.O1 ~ , ' ~ . 1 a~. . . _i December 13, 1995 Members of T'own Council . The 'rown of Vail . 17 S. Frontage Itoad, West . Vail, CO $1657 . Dear Council Meffibers: As a long time owner at 1Vlanor VaR Lodge I would like to, express my concem and displeasure at the swggested closing of the eaisting pedestrnan crossing froffi Manor Vail to Golden Peak. This pedestrian crossgng has been in existence fbr a . rnunnber of years and has evorked in the past. My concerns are: 1. People will not walk to the proposed new north or somth crossings,lbut , rather, will climb across the berm and.pjaywalk" to the opposite side - of the street. . 2. Visibility from the new proposed crossings is no better than ffic visiibility from the existing crossings. 3. The road cannot be widened enougln to eliininate the visYibillity problems. . Perhaps a110f the concegns, . i.e., liabiliry, visibility, etc., would be better served if the existing crosswalk were madc mvre visible with increased signage, and a painted crosswallc. I hope that you wilI consider wr opinions on this matter before voting on this project. Sincerely, ~ Donald H. Williams 595 E. Vail Valley Drive, #103 Vail, CO 81657 cc: Vail Associates, Inc. - David Corbin Fax: 970-845I 2555 East Village Homeowners Association - Jim Lamont Fax: 970-827 5856 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ;12-19-95 ; 1:58PM ; 303479955.5-+ 3034792157;# 2 -r...- x- t: F' I)ecembar 15, 1993 . Dear 'I'owrn Couna'1 Representatives: Rcoently, z was informe~d of the intentian to renovate the base of Gold Pea~ moian4ak, Althduo thare are msny bonefas from tbia pYOjece, I am concemed S=AnNAN rU,,,Ia,ffi abaxat the effects on the Gold Peak uad volleyball cotarta. In this leeter, I . cum would like 4o convoy soffie of the advantagea of ffioting the sand couafs to ano4hex looatimn in Vail. 7I'he ini¢ial benefit is for the menbere o£mur oommunity. As a pareicipant in the King af the Mouaq.ain voll,~ysball touxnzmwt, I can. d'arec4ly relate to the v,M imporeAnce ofvolleyball to the Vail local& Ibis sport pgovidea an importan4 rccrmiorl outlot for numerotas residents. I,ocaLq amd frimda of locals J.R. stna=,, M.D. shovvoase 8ome of the beg vmlleyball talent ffi the rtate eaah saamnor. Many of xJ. xowkiiu, nq.n. the athletcs play three or four timee pcx wreek all summor lang! W.J. Sremm M.D. In addi4aon, the Kiag of the Mountaiai volleyball tou.ffiament is tho longest nmain$ two man volleyball toumament ffi the state of Colorado. For fiwenty- 4hree years, 4e~ havve fiequeatly traveled froffi Califoffiia, PTeev Moxico, and ~ Utah to campete a , gaffist sogne of the best players ie? the regiaaa. The M. Dw61ik, M.D. avaflaba'l~' y of sand courts makes it possible to attract this high level of taleut. Withou2 the opcn division, the King of the Mountain toumammt would not T.F. Schkgel, NLD. exii. Two m~ volleyball also offire soa~ ~haa~e naark~ potential. This epoxfi ie a~",~_v°'~ one of the most exciting and fasting grovvmg sporta in the nat'ton. With the S.F. liorntel, M.D. construction of new sead couYttil, we have a great opportunity to paomote L.fY. Urreo R M.D. g11Y18Y'e evCtlts t0 thC ValEy. D.P. Vnn Psncmaum, M.D. gAgily' ~e fmancW bWligffdow of new simd volleyball courts anake a lot of R.S. Waakowia,M.A 9ensC. Thg d1Y'ed aYld %881tiU,&i YeFJen110 P06S1bflItieS AI'e tLemendOll6. One aan sA. wrig,t,M.n. dWlY look towuds Aspen as a prime oxample ofhow hacratiwe a voIleyball tmummmt can be for a aki towin. With the assis¢ance of the VRD, Vail caa host anc of the premiey' vmlleyball tmumamenta in the countcy. Furtharmore, cOMMTUW PHYMCLtM the cDnstruction cvsts sppm to be rel.atively inexpeneide. I hope that these boaefLts ue coneidegad durinv.g your next toevn meeting. 'Ihanks for all of your J.n. spi-Sal- BffOYLB. KD. P6ar~-. M.U. lfor,dSarpno . ~(1 ' ?7mCi~ely1 *,.tcrcu, 181 W, Meedow llr. M.D. 5ulre Nulnher 400 WIS/P8 Vaii, CO 81657 (47n) 476-1I00 FA.?: (970) 479-9555 TRW OZTSE A3SOCIATION Vail, Colora,do . c/o Rike Woottm 3700 Eut Aflameda Ave,tiue #SQO Denver, Colorada 80209 303-388-5535 or Fax 303-322-3769 Decezaber 15, 1995 Town Coteaacal Town of Vanl ' -by FAX: 790-479-2157 Aadges and Gentleanene At your meeting in Dwember 19, 1993, ie is our understandarr,g that you wanl gave fiiW consideration to Vail Associates redevelopment plan for Gold Peak. We have expressed genag stappoft for this process, especiaUy g~ mzded ~ and baw ffacilides. One of the n ed base fficilities is ianproved parking facalibies, espeeMy undegground parking. We strongly support the constructioai of the undergauiand facility as proposed by VA. VVe also atrongly opposa ft concept . of replacing 4his undergzund facility with a surface pazkuig lote Tlvis would mplace tanas cvurta wath cars - not a gvod switch. T'his would most seriously aanpac4 the huald'aaags and hornes to our west, such aa Ramshorn, but would effect our viera~ as welfl. We will ag¢empt to be at 2he mee4ing an person, but wanted 80 express our vaews foP the aecord. Thank you fog your considerataon. And HaPPY Holidaya! , . ~ . D. Wootte%fl presiden4 g Td WdE0:20 S6. Si 33Q DEC-15-95 FRI 09:07 AM P.01 Deccmbcr 14, 1995 A/lemben of'I'Own Council The Town of Vai1 17 S. Fa'On4age Road, West Vail, CO $ 1657 Mat Couneil Meembers: As a long dme owner ag Manor Vai1- L.adge I would l,ike eo expTe5s my shock and displeasure at the Bugg@sted closirtg of the exasting pr.destrian crassing &om Nipnog Vail fo oWzn PCa Thia pedeanian crossing has been in existencc for many yeara attd has tia+orked very wel.l.. Nty concerns are: 1. people will not walk to the proposed new noreh or south cm ssin s, but rathe~', will cli~mb across the bexxn and "°jaywal~C°' to the opposite side of the street, whic ~ waicause greae danger. 2. Visibility #'rom the, new proposed crossings is no better than the visxbiliey from the existing . GxOSSings. . 3. The soacl cann:GC 1>:; widened enough t.o eliminate the visibiliYy pxOblems. Perhgps alI Of the Cbncei-ns, i.e., liabi]ity, visiblzity. etc., w0uld b8 becter servcd in A simple martner if the exiscing crosswalk were made more visible with increased signage, nobng "pe&strian crossing" and a paijite,d crosswa.lk. I feel very strongly about this issue and do not think that the tawzz of Vail morally or legalfy has the right to block the access to our private walk to oux condominiums. I hppo thac yau krill agreC with our strong objecciqns co chis maaer befora voting on this projocG 'o ~ ~ ~ / - r--c e 1,46) c r0 .rs ~ 'e /~a ~ /J C!a .SS GvA/~ G~v v~~f a/e ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ /6~1tik.3 tor yotr ~ ti;Q c n~f C~-~ r` C ~ C p s~ S'1 r_ . ~ ~l (I" ~ . REC(~IVED ~0. D Q. E ~ - .~595 EAST VAIL vALLEY DR1VE VAIL, Co[.oanllo 81657 970-476-5000 Fnx 970-476-4982 December 15, 1995 800-950-8245 Mr. Robert Mcl.aurin THE TOVVN OF VAgI, 17 S. Frontage Road, West Vail, CO 81657 Dear Bob: I have been getting a lot of comments opposed to the closing of the existing access point from Manor Vail Lodge to Golden Peak. While there appear to be no objections to the proposed new crosswalks, our owners are concerned about issues of convenience and safety by physically obstructing the walk that has been in existence for 30 years. It has been pointed out by some owners that the location of the new crosswalks are no less dangerous than the existing walk. Common sense dictates that people will cross the road at the point closest to where they want to go. Even today, many people 'by-pass the existing walk ways and cross at places they perceive to be more convenient. Ignoring this reality may result in a greater liability potential rather than a lesser liability potential as some of the inembers of the Town Council think. In fact, there has been some as yet unorganized discussion about directing me to ask the Association's legal counsel to intercede on the owners behalf because the Ho:r.eo :vnar's Assceiation is cor.cerned that the Towr~ of Vail is encumbering liRanor Vail Condominium Association with a greater liability risk. I urge you and the Town Council to reconsider your decision relating specifically to the closure of this area. T'hank you, MAN0R VAIL LODGE Robert S. McCleary, C General Manager PRESENTED BY VILLACE RESORTS MANAGERS OF F`INE CONDOMINIUM PROPEATIES 12/14/1995 19:29 3102710876 FROM THE ROSENBERGS PAGE 01 Decembar 14,1995 ftRemhes of Town Council The 'd'own of i/ail 17 S. Fmncage Road, West Vail, CO 81657 I?m CouncaP A~Reenbers: As a long eime ownea' of Manar Vail I,odge I would l.ike to express my shock and displeasure , at the suggested closing of the cxistuig pedcsaian crossing fronn ManorVai1 to Galden Pea1c, Z'his petesbrian crossing has bcen in existence for many years and has worked very well. My concerns are: 1. Pcople will not walk to the propvsvks new north ob• :.oueh c-rossings, but rathe; will climb across the berm and "jaywalc" ta the opposite side of the sftet, which vdi11 Gause gmat d.arsger. 2. ~fisibzlity from the n.ew proposc;d „•;si.ng;, i~,• r.7 better than the visibiIity ftom the existing crossings. 3. ne rflad cannot t1e widened enough to eliminate Yhe visibiliry prablezzts. Perhaps all of the concegns, a.e., liability, visibility, etc., would be bcccF;r se:rded in a szmple manner if the existing crosswatlc weze made more viszble with incteased signagc, noting "pedes4rian cros5ing" and a painted crosswalk. Ifeel very strongly about this issuc and do nat think that the town of'Yail moz'alIy or legally has the rzght to block the aGCess to our private walk to our condominiums. I hope thaY you will agree with our strong objections to this mattea before voting on this pmjecL Sincer c ly, Sydney I. Rasenberg cc: Vkit Assas;iatc;s, Lic. - David Corbin FasY ~1'illage Homcowmcrs Associarion - Jim Lamone Jack Paul - Attoxncy DEC-14-95 TNU 12:29 PM MANOR VAIL LODGE FAX N0, 9704764982 P.O1 ~ aM.fi s~ December 13, 1995 , Members of °]('own Council The Town of Vaafl 17 S. Fgontage Road, West vail, 81657 Dear council Meffibers: As along tnme owneg at Manor Vail Lodge I vvould flike to expreSS ffiy concern and dpspicasure at the suggested closang of the existtznng pedestrian crossing from Maavr Vail to Golden Pealc. 'fl'his pedestrian crossing has been in existence fvg a naarnber of yeaxs and has worked in the past. My coacerns are. 1e Peop1e will not walk to the proposed new north or south crossings, but gathcra will ciianb across the berffi and "jayvvalk" t0 tle OppoSitc 5ade of ghe sgxeet. 2. Visibality fgoan the new proposed crossings is nm better than the visibility from the existing crossings. 3. The road cannot be widened enaugh to eliminate the visibility problems. ~erhaps a11 0f tae concems9. i.c., liability, v1S1b111ty, etc., wou1d be better served if the existizag crosswalk were rnade gnvxe wisible taith inereased signage, aLnd a painted crosswalko I hope that you wili coaasider our opinions on this matter before voting on this pgojecg. SlE1CeIClyy, ~ DonaYd H. Williams 595 E. Vai8 VaIIey Drive, #103 Vai19 CO 81657 cco Vail Associates9 Inc. - David Corbin Fax: 970-845=2555 Bast Villagt IHoffieowners Association - Jim Lamomt Fax: 970-827-5856 12/14/95 THU 11:18 FA% 8042852563 BRYAPI BROTHERS,INC 0002 J?o-9N 6aANDOLPH HUTGI-9E5ON 551 B FALAflOUTH STFEET, SUI'TE 302 . RICHMONO, VIRf31NW 23230 7'ELEPHbME 804/288-0300 P.O. BOJt 1234 FAX 0 g04/2W2563' RICHNROND, VA 23209 December 14, 1995 Members of Town Cauncil The Town of Vail 17 S. Frontage Road, West Vailo Co 81657 Deag CouanCii MemberS o As a long time owner at Manor Vai:L Lodge I would like ta express my concern and displeasure at the siuggested closing of the existirag pedestrian cxossing from Manax Vail to Golden Peake This pedestrian crossing has been in existence for a numbex of ye2tx's and has worked in the past e My concerns areo 1_ People will not walk to the: proposed new north or soutYl crossings, but rather, wil:L clilab acrass tYae bergn and "jaywalk41 to the opposite side af the streeto a. Visibility fram the new proposed crossings is no better than the visibility from the exzsting crossingso 3 e The road cannot be raidened encangh to eliminate the visibility problemso Perhaps all of the cancerns, i.e., liabilitya visibility, etco, would be better served if the exi.sting crossraalk were made more vi,sible with increasei3 signage, and a painted crvsswalk. . I hvpe that ydu will consider our opinions on this matter before voting on this prvjecta sincerely, 12 ~Rossie ohn Randolph Hutchesdn Carter Hutcheson Unit 215-16-17 JRi / bb cca Vail Associates, Inc_, David Corbin EaSt villdge HofieOWFSe]rs 14550Giat1091, Jim Lamvnt - - Go?den Peak Skn Base RecDevelopment • , MEMoRANDUM • TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: iVovember 28, 1995 ~ SUBJECT: Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment : , ::~:iz: <:';••><::::::>::?>:>?'.>:z~:::::':?~ .,...v.....,.,...,,...,...,r ............................,,,..,.....<.:.~:•::;;::::;:~:~::•::::::;;•::::•;;>:.:;:•;;::>::>'::::>:::':::'>:z::::::<;::::~~::';:<:>:~::`:;;~'z:::::'•>:>~; ;:i?!>%;:?::z::':<:>:i:>:::~:i::;::z:::`:;E;?'i.....,.. Attached to this memo is the staff memorandum on the proposed Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment, wrhich was reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission on November 27, 1995. This memorandum is provided to the Council members as background information for the discussion of the Golden Peak Redevelopment Application, which is scheduled to occur on the afternoon of iVovember 28, 1995. Although the Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment Application is not scheduled for a first reading review until December 5, 1995, staff requested a brief worksession in order to familiarize the council members with the proposed redevelopment project. ~ GOLDEN PEAK SK9 BASE REDE1/ELOPMEIVT ~ Staff Mernorandum TABLE OF CONTESVTS 0. Ontrodaact6orL ...................................................................................................................2 A. Zoning Code Text Revisions .................................................................................2 ~ B. Revisions to the Previously-Approved Development Plan ......................................3 1. Overviev?r ....................................................•..............................................3 2. Major Elements ...............•--.......................................................................4 go. BackgroueadL ...................................................................................................................8 0980 Zonung AnaEysos ............................................................................................................11 o!/. Cr6teraa To Be Used un Eva&uatBng This Proposa9 ........................................................13 ~ A. Zone Change Criteria ..........................................................................................13 B. Conformance V1/ith The Vail Comprehensive Plan ...............................................14 1. Vail Land Use Plan ..................................................................................14 2. Vail Village Master Ptan ...........................................................................15 3. Transportation Master Plan..................................................................... 17 4. Streetscape Niaster Plan .........................................................................18 5. Recreation Trails Master Plan ..................................................................25 6. Comprehensive Open Lands Plan ...........................................................26 C. Development Plan Standards and Criteria ...........................................................27 D. Criteria for Approving the Multi-Family Dwellings .................................................33 V. Staff Recommenda4Bon .................................................................................................35 f:\everyone\pecMemos\gpeak.n27 1 ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development and Public UVorks Departments DATE: iVovember 27, 1995 RE: A request for an amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District), and an amendment to the previously approved development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, 485 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by David Corbin Planners: Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton 0. V9VTRODUCT90N ~ Vail Associates, Inc. has requested approval of an amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Niunicipal Code (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) and an amendment to the previously approved development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base property located at 485 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. The Golden Peak Ski Base is located in the Ski Base/Recreation zone district and is the only property within the Town of Vail which has this zoning designation. Ski Base/Recreation is a very unique zoning designation, however, it does have similarities to the Special Development District (SDD) and the General Use (GU) zone districts. The zoning parameters allowed within these districts are very closely tied to a"development plan", w?hich is reviewed and approved along with the proposed text of the zone district provisions. Therefore, it is important to note that the revievu of the Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment application is twofold, and includes: (a) Zoning Code text revisions, and (b) Revisions to the previously approved Development Plan. A. Proposed Zoning Code Text Revisions The applicant is proposing to make minor amendments to the text of Chapter 18.39 of the Vail Municipal Code (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) to reflect the proposed amendrnents to the previously approved development plan. Rather than provide a detailed explanation of all the proposed text changes in this memorandum, staff requests that the PEC members review Attachment # 1, in which the proposed changes are clearly identified. The text proposed to be deleted from the District has a line through it and the text which is proposed to be added to the district is in bold. f:\everyonelpec\memos\gpeak.n27 2 ,i ~ B. Proposed Revisions to the Previously Approved Development Plan ~ 1. Overview Chapter 18.39.090(A) (Development Plan Required) of the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District states: "To ensure the unified development, the protection of the natural environment, the compatibility with the surrounding area and to assure that development in the ski base/recreation district will meet the intent of the district, a development plan shall be required." The approved development plan shall be used as the principat guide for all development within the Ski Base/Recreation District. Amendments to the plan which do not change its substance may be approved by the PEC at a regularly scheduled public hearing. The changes to the previously approved plan currently being proposed by the applicant are considered to be substantive and, therefore, require PEC, Town Council and DRB review. There are significant transportation/circulation and parking issues and opportunities associated with the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base. The interface between and among Town of Vail buses, private shuttles and vans, private vehicles and pedestrians must be carefully reviewed. The challenge is to accommoc9ate the variety of sometimes conflicting uses and users in the most safe and efficient manner possible, taking into account the interests of the neighborhood. To understand and meet the transportation/circulation and parking needs, associated with ~ the Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment, Vail Associates has hired TDA, Inc. of Denver (a transportation planning firm) to conduct an analysis of the transportation operating characteristics of the Golden Peak Ski Base. This analysis identifies the number of skiers arriving by the various modes of transportation, documents existing access and circulation conditions, provides future design day arrival volumes, and presents an operations plan to insure appropriate use of the facility and minimal traffic congestion. Vail Associates has also hired RRC, Associates of Boulder (a research, planning and design firm) to perform a Golden Peak Ski Base portal analysis and facility survey. This survey polled 527 skiers regarding information relating to their current and expected uses of the Golden Peak Ski Base facilities. A copy of the complete TDA and RRC reports are contained in the original application notebooks previously provided to the PEC and Town Council members. A summary of the information contained in those reports, however, can be found as Attachment #2 to this memorandum. Vail Associates proposes to alleviate vehicular and pedestrian congestion now experienced on and around the properly by (1) formalizing and improving the general skier drop-off, (2) reducing vehicular traffic with the removal of the present public parking lot and by "managing" the on-site parking, (3) designing the Children's Center drop-off area, and (4) making improvements to the major pedestrian ways leading to the site. f:\everyone\pecMemos\gpeak.n27 ~ 3 2. Nflajor Elemen$s The major elements of the proposed Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment plan are identified as follows: (see Rttachment #3 for site plans, building floor plans and elevation drawings and other drawings associated with the redevelopment project). o The existing Golden Peak Ski Base facility is proposed to be replaced with a new base lodge building of 82,779 sq. ft., in virtually the same location as the existing building and the building approved in conjunction with the 1985 redevelopment plan. (Please see Section II of this memorandum (Background) for a more detailed description of the previously approved 1985 redevelopment plan). The proposed program for the new base lodge building includes employee lockers and office space, meeting room areas, public restrooms and lockers, condominium parking spaces and a private club on the lower level of the building. The second level of the building (which is the first level on the mountain side of the building, due to a grade differential) is comprised of retail space, a restaurant, and ticketing/ski school facilities. The third and fourth levels of the building are devoted to six residential condominiums. A more detailed breakdown of the square footage calculations of the proposed building, in comparison to the 1985 approved plan, is provided on the page following the Zoning Analysis. The proposed uses un the base Eodge buildirag are vir4ually the same as the uses revaewed and approved 6n 1985. The square footage allocated to each of tFuese ~ aoses, woth the exception of restaaarant and employee Bocker room space, has signif6cantly ancreased. The building square footage proposed for approva9 with this redeveloprraent p1an as approxBmately 17,629 sq. ft., or 27% 9arger than the 1985 approval. o The exostirtg 950-space surtace parking Eot, which is currently open $o the public for a fee, is proposed go be rernoved and replaced vvith a 148-space "managed" parking structuceo This structure is proposed to be approximately 64,800 sq. ft. in size and is substantially buried into the hillside where the tennis courts are currently located. With the exception of the vehicular opening on the northwest corner and the pedestrian access on the northeast corner, the structure will not be visible. In response to neighborhood concerns regarding traffic congestion in the neighborhood, Vail Associates has proposed a managed, or "reserved right-to-park," mechanism that is designed to control the availability and use of parking spaces in the structure. This mechanism, which wrill be offered to the public, is a non-equity "club" or association of up to 500 members, who would have the right to park in this structure for a fee. Two tiers of membership in this association are proposed. The first t6er would consist of 50 members who would have a right to park in the structure in an identified reserved parking space. These first tier members would also have the right to use the club facilities located within the lower level of the base lodge facility. This club includes lockers, locker room facilities, ski valet, ticketing, and other amenities. The remaining 98 parking spaces would be sold to second tAer members, wrho wrould have the right to park in the structure based upon a controlled reservation system. Second tier memberships would be sold at a 2:1 ratio, however, if demand warrants, additional subscriptions may be offered up to a ratio of ~ 4.5:1, or approximately 450 tier two members. Second tier members would also have the right to use the club facilities. These members would be required to call a minimum of 24 f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 4 ~ hours in advance to reserve their use of an available space. A reservation list would be compiled daily for use by Vail Associates personnel stationed in the attendant booth at ~ the entry to the structure. In the event that not all of the 98 second tier parking spaces are reserved on a given day by the club members, Vail Associates reserves the right to utilize these spaces for other guests, members of the skiing public, employees or other persons who could call and reserve a space less than 24 hours in advance. This provision in the operational structure of the club would allow full, or nearly full, utilization of at least 98 of the 148 parking spaces in the structure. Members of the general public would be able to reserve a second tier parking space but will not have the right to utilize club amenities. See the Golden Peak Operational Management Plan, Attachment # 4, for a more complete explanation of the proposed parking structure management. - Although the applicant has indicated that they intend to construct the parking structure and all improvements on the Golden Peak property during the same construction seasan it is possible that, due to lack of sufficient pre-sales, the parking structure may not be built at all or may be delayed one construction season. Vail Associates has indicated that if the parking structure is not constructed, the area where it was intended to be located would be regraded and revegetated and a discussion would occur with the Town Council regarding their obligation to pay parking pay-in-lieu fees for the loss of public parking that would result. • The four existing tennis courts at the Golden Peak area are proposed to be removed in conjunction with this redevelopment proposal. An agreement has been reached beiween ~ the Vail Recreation District (VRD) and Vail Associates that calls for a cash payment to be provided by V.A. in order to cover the cost of relocation, resurfacing and construction of new court(s) elsewhere in the Town of Vail. The number and location of the courts will be determined by the VRD, with Ford Park being considered as the possible new location. The 1985 approved development plan contemplated the possible relocation of one tennis court to the Chalet Road right-of-way. It is the intention of the VRD to leave the existing tennis courts next to Chalet Road, but not to expand the tennis program at that site. Therefore, no additional courts have been proposed in the Chalet Road right-of-way. • Both ski lifts 6 and 12 are proposed for replacement as a part of this redevelopment plan. Chair 6 is currently a double chair with an hourly capacity of 1,130 skiers per hour. It is proposed for replacement with a detachable quad chair lift with an hourly capacity of 2,250 skiers per hour. Chair 6 will be redesigned to allow skiers to unload at a midpoint on the top of Golden Peak, or to continue on to the top terminal lo'cated near the base of Chair 11. In the future, Chair 10 will be realigned and extended, ultimately enabling skiers to ride a 6 to 10 connection to the Two Elk Restaurant and China Bowl. The new plan calls for the lower terminal of Chair 6 to be relocated approximately 30' ta the east. This will cause the lift alignment to shift from its current location, and will necessitate the removal of additional trees in the area. The lower terminal is proposed to be of a similar design as the lower terminal of the Vista Bahn. The color of the terminal housing, however, is proposed to be green rather than blue. The lift operator building will also be replaced, and relocated to the east side of the terminal. It is intended that this building will accommodate overnight ski storage and a bus shelter in addition to its function as a lift operator building. ~ f:\everyone\pecVnemos\gpeak.n27 5 ~ The existing Chair 12 is currently a double chair with an hourly capacity of 960 skiers per • hour. The proposed replacement chair wrill be a fixed grip, low profile, triple chair, with a slow loading speed to assist in the instruction of chi4dren and first time skiers. This lift is proposed to have an hourfy capacity of 1,500 skiers per hour. The base of Chair 12 will remain near its present Iocation. However, the upper terminal of the lift will shift approximately 230 feet to the west and will be 50 feet lower in elevation. This relocation allows for less interference with other skiers and provides easier terrain for beginners. The new alignment is proposed to be tocated through an existing stand of trees, some of which may need to be removed. Similar to Chair 6, a new lift operator building is proposed near the lower terminal. The existing lift operator building also functions as a locker room for lift attendants that are based out of Golden Peak. The new plan calls for these employee lockers to be relocated to the basement of the new base lodge building. In addition to the replacement of Chairs 6 and 12, the applicant is proposing to relocate the "poma" lift from its current location on the west side of Chair 12 to the Children's Center area. The !ift will service the practice area for the Chitdren's Ski Schoof, as welf as provide ski-in/ski-out opportunity for the residents at fVorthwoods Condominiums and Pinos Del Norte to the east. Some regrading is proposed in this area, but there will be no loss of vegetation. o There are currently 21 head-in parking spaces located immediately wrest of the Ch6@dren's Cengere The proposed redevelopment plan includes a total of 30 short -term spaces located on the inside curve of the expanded bus drop-off lane. Although Vail Associates' traffic consultant recommended the addition of 12 to 15 parking spaces to the 21 existing spaces, which would provide a total of 33 - 36 spaces, it appears that site ~ limitations are such that 30 spaces are all that can be provided. The bus lane will remain on the east side of the Golden Peak property between the new base lodge and the Children's Center. The separated bus lane is proposed to be much longer than it is currently, accommodating the turning radius requirements of the Town of Vail's new longer buses. o The geaaeraB pub6ac skier drop-off zone, which is currently located an the eastern portion of the site, has been expanded and relocated to the north side of the newr base lodge building and parking structure. This area has been designed to accommodate 29 vehicles. 23 of the spaces are depicted on the site plan as angled drop-off spaces, with the remaining 6 being parallel drop-off spaces, thereby maintaining a continuous flow of vehicles through the area. In the center portion of the skier drop-off zone, one loading anci delBvery berth has been provided into an area betvveen the base lodge building and the proposed parking structure. The en$uance to the sux residentiaB condorniniurns is located on the far eastern end of the general public skier drop-off zone. The entry courtyard is gated and surrounded by a privacy vuall and landscaping. Two guest parking spaces, a sidewafk and the driveway leading to the residential parking structure are Iocated inside the courtyard area. o VaiV Va91ey Drfive Bs proposed Yo be realigneci to allow for an improved intersection at the existing Manor Vail entrance, as well as to straighten out curves in the road, in order to improve sight distances. f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 6 ~ • Severai pedestrian and bicycle conraections leading to, and around, the Golden Peak Ski Base are proposed for improvement in conjunction with this redevelopment plan. On- ~ site pedestrian and bicycle path improvements are depicted on the various site plans and off-site streetscape improvements are described in more detail later in this memorandum. Upon final approval of the development plan, cross-easements will be entered into between Vail Associates and the Town of Vail to assure the unrestricted use of the public areas in and around the Golden Peak base area. • In an effort to provide more detailed information regarding how the various elements of the Golden Peak Ski Base facility will be operated, the applicant has submitted the "Golden Peak Operational Management Plan" for PEC review. This plan is a supplement to the various development plans that have been presented in conjunction with the redevelopment application (see Attachment # 4). The plan is also an outgrowth of the Growth Management Agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Associates, which is intended to manage peak periods within Vail. Like the Growth Management Agreement, the proposed Golden Peak Operational Management Plan is a means of managing the demands upon the Golden Peak portal and the impacts on surrounding infrastructure. The Management Plan provides varying operational techniques, depending on the period of the year. There are three different periods that have been identified: Christmas Peak, which are the days between December 26th and December 31 st; High Season, which includes President's weekend and each weekend beginning the third weekend in February through the end of March; and non-peak, which are the days outside of the fwo above-mentioned periods. It is important to note that the design day standard for Golden Peak planning studies and infrastructure assessment is 15,000 skiers at one time ("SAOT"), which is a typical ~ day count for the current Christmas peak period. The physical infrastructure currently proposed is designed to accommodate the portal demands at a 15,000 SAOT event. As recommended by staff, the components or elements which.are identified in the Operational Management Plan for Golden Peak, include the following: A. Managed parking structure; B. Public skier and Children's Center drop-off areas; C. Employee parking; D. Mountain operations; E. Local and community programs, such as DEVO; F. Ski Club Vail activities; G. Aduft and children's ski school; H. Loading, delivery and trash removal; 1. Snow management; and J. Special events. • The Mill Creek Diversion, a branch of the Mill Creek main channel used to-divert excessive stream flows, runs through the Golden Peak property. A portion of this diversion, from Chair 6 to the north side of Vail Valley Drive, is currently in an underground culvert. The applicant is proposing to extend and bury the culvert an additional 370 feet to the west. This extension is necessitated by the regrading of the lower sections of the ski runs that end at Golden Peak. Staff has received a letter from the Colorado Division of Wildlife stating that they have no objections to the culverting of this section of Mill Creek. The applicant has also been working with the Army Corps of ~ Engineers to obtain approval of the undergrounding. Staff believes that the proposed culvert extension will not adversely impact this site. Alpine Engineering Inc. has designed . f:\everyonelpecUnemos\gpeak.n27 7 ~ the extended culvert to accornmodate, the proposed undergrounding without increasing ~ the 100 and 500-year flood potential on surrounding properties.. o Currently, there are two race course lanes at Golden Peak. These race courses are used for the Ski Club Vail program, amateur racing and private races for groups visiting Vail. The proposed redevelopment increases the number of race course lanes to three, with the ability to have four wrhen demand is high. A new bui{ding is proposed to be IocaYed at the base of the race course. This building is intended to be used for the operations of the races, including public address and timing. The building is proposed to be located approximately 130 feet to the south of the new base lodge facility. The three existing buildings, located near the race course, are currently used for storage associated with the race lanes and are proposed to be removed. The new lift operator buildings and the race finish building will provide storage for race events. OV. BACICGR0UND In 1983, a new zone district, Ski Base/Recreation, vuas created in order to allowr the Golden Peak Ski Base facility to be rezoned from Agricultural and Open Space to Ski Base/Recreation. As a part of the rezoning process, a development plan for the site was required. In late 1983, the Town Council approved a development plan for the Golden Peak ski base. The concept of that development p{an vuas to retain afl the uses in one main building. The existing building was to be removed and a new building was to be constructed in the same general location as the existing building. The plan included a new base facility containing: public lockers, employee lockers, condorninium ~ parking, retail, and a nursery on the first level. A restaurant, Ski School and Children's Center was located on the second level. As with the current proposal, the 3rd and 4th levels were dedicated to six residential condominiums. There were also improvements to the parking, tennis courts, and bus turnaround. Amendments to that plan were approved by the PEC on January 7, 1985 and final Design Review Board approval was granted on January 30, 1985. This plan has never been fully implemented. At the same time that this development plan was approved by the Town, Vail Associates signed a declaration of protective covenant with the neighborhood. Any additions or modifications to this covenant requires a vote of approval from the owners of 75% of the "benefitted land" (the Golden Peak IVeighborhaod Association). Since the initial approval, Vail Associates has requested several amendments to the approved development plan. Listed below are the amendments that have been granted: 1) On July 2, 1985, the Town approved an "interim" development plan for Golden Peak. At that time, Vail Associates did not wish to fully complete the development plan that had been approved earlier in the year. The approval for the interim plan lapsed after two years. The interim plan contained the following: A. A nevu modular building, adjacent to the existing winter-time modular, for day-care purposes (for children ranging in age from infant to 3 years old). B. A revised parking lot configuration accommodating 103 paid, public parking spaces, 20 Vail P?ssociates staff spaces and 18 parent drop-off spaces. C. A new set of stairs, near the existing drop-off area, leading to the bike path west of the modular buildings. f:\everyon e\pec\memos\gpeak. n27 8 ~ D. A revised landscape plan including berming on the east end of the parking lot and five additional spruce trees north of the modular units. ~ E. An interior remodel of the existing buildings to improve employee working conditions and to add space to the rental shop. 2) In February 1988, the PEC and the Town Council approved the Golden Peak Children's Center. The Town Council approved Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1988, and amended the Ski Base/ Recreation Zone District to allow for the Children's Center in this zone district. The approval allowed for the separation of the children's ski school program, and child care, from the main building. This approval also allowed for the removal of the existing modular building that had been used for several years by the Ski School. 3) On September 14, 1992, the PEC approved an amendment to the development plan to allow for the addition of two ski tows, located adjacent to the Golden Peak facility (the magic carpet and the poma lift). 4) In July 1993, the PEC approved an amendment to the development plan to allow for new restrooms and locker rooms, attached to the northwest corner of the existing building. These buildings were constructed as approved. Since May 1995, when Vail Associates submitted the application for an amendment to the approved development plan and an amendment to the text to the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District, there have been many meetings with the PEC, Town Council and staff. The following information is intended to provide a summary of the discussions that have occurred. A joint worksession with the Vail Town Council and the PEC was held on June 12, 1995. The i purpose of the worksession was to provide an overview of the project to the public and the board members, as well as to discuss and provide direction to the applicant regarding the Town's position on a number of "policy issues" related to the proposed redevelopment project. The issues discussed at the worksession included: A. TransportatioNCirculation and Parking 1. Privatized Parking Structure; 2. Employee Parking; 3. Skier and Children's Center Drop-Off/Pick- Up Areas; 4. Roadway/Pedestrian Improvements; B. Neighborhood Issues; C. Employee Housing; and D. Review Schedule. At a Vail Town Council worksession on July 11, 1995, the Council discussed and resolved a number of the larger policy issues related to the Golden Peak redevelopment application, and the surrounding neighborhood. The issues discussed included: A. Implementation of the Streetscape Master Plan; B. Making Vail Valley Drive a one-way street; C. Primary modes of access to the new facility; D. The loss of public parking; ~ E. Employee parking; and F. Possible parking structure at Ford Park. f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 9 r ~ At the end of this meeting it was suggested that joint working meetings be held with the applicant, the applicant's consulting team, neighborhood representatives and Town staff for the purposes of clarifying and resolving technical issues related to the project. Five joint working meetings held throughout the months of July and August (1995) included discussions of the following topics: A. Pedestrian connections, including implementation of the Streetscape Master Plan; B. Vehicular entrance to the residential units; C. Design of the Children's Center and General Skier drop-off zones; D. Managed parking structure; E. Outline of Operational Management Plan concepts; F. Design of soccer field parking structure; G. Building architecture, mass and bulk and, roof form; and H. Project revieuv schedule. On September 11, 1995 a vuorksession vuas held with the PEC for the purpose of updating the public and PEC members on the revisions which had been made to the project since the last public meeting (July 11, 1995). Issues discussed at this worksession included: A. On-mountain improvements 1. Lift alignments 2. Mountain regrading 3. Race course 4. Mill Creek diversion culvert extension ~ 5. Debris flow study . 6. Bike paths and hiking trails B. Base facility site planning 1. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation 2. Landscape plan 3. Grading plan 4. Snow management plan 5. Building massing and roof form A joint worksession was held on October 9, 1995 with the PEC and the Design Review Board for the purpose of discussing the architecture of the proposed base lodge and employee housing. On October 23, 1995 a final worksession was held with the PEC to discussion the Streetscape improvements planned for Vail Valley Drive, from the Village Transportation Center to the Children's Center. The PEC also gave the applicant feedback on the proposed Operational Management Plan. Staff memoranda and minutes for the meetings described above are on file at the Office of the Department of Community Development. f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 10 , III. ZONING APIALYSIS The following zoning analysis has been prepared for the purpose of comparing the proposed ~ redevelopment plan to the Ski Base/Recreation zone district development standards and to the previously approved 1985 development plan. For a more complete breakdown of the specific uses within the building and a comparison of the 1985 approved plan to the 1995 proposed plan, please see the next page. Zoning: Ski Base/Recreation Lot Area: 49.83 acres Allowed/Required 1985 approved 1995 proposed bv Zonin4 develooment olan develoament nlan Setbacks: As shown on the n- 95' n- 96' 10 lodge approved development s- n/a 78' to garage plan e- 45' s- n/a w - 206' e - 43' w- i 5' to garage 210' to lodge Site Coverage: As shown on the 30,156 sq. ft. 31,725 sq. ft. lodge approved development 32,254 sq. ft. of plan parking structure Landscaping: As shown on the N/A N/A approved development plan Parking: As shown on the 149 spaces *'221 spaces approved development Plan . Height:"' For a flat or mansard roof - 35' 35' 6% arch. projections 60% roof area less than 35' 40' , 74% less than 35' 40% roof area less than 40' 20% less than 40' Dwelling Units: 1 dwelling unit per 8 acres or 6 dwelling units 6 dwelling units 6 dwelling units GRFA: 30% of the tolal gross 22.2% or 28.3% or square footage of the 14,462 sq. ft. 23,457 sq. ft. main building Commeroial area No limitation except retail & meeting 4,633 sq. ft. or 7% for retail 7,526 sq. ft. or 9% space, which is 15% & 5% respectively 2,005 sq. ft. or 3% for meeting space 3,607 sq. fi. or 4% of the non-residential floor area. Total floor area: As shown on the 65,150 sq. ft. 82,779 sq. ft. approved development plan ' This figure includes 118 public parking spaces, 12 spaces associated with the six residential units, 7 general slcier drop-off spaces and 12 Children's Center spaces that were added in 1988. This figure includes 146 managed spaces, 14 spaces associated with the residential units, 29 general skier drop- off spaces and 30 Children's Center drop-off spaces. For a more detailed definition of how building height is calculated in the Ski Base Recreation Zone District, please see the proposed zoning changes attached to the end of this memorandum. Note: Architectural projections may exceed the maximum building height by 25% of the height limit but not more than 15 feet. ~ f:\everyon e\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 11 . Square footage caEcu8at6ons and comparison to the 1985 approveci plan Square Footage by Use 1985 1995 %Chanae Retail space 4,633 7,526 + 62% Restaurant . 12,165 9,756 - 20% Ticketing/Ski school 3,097 3,252 + 5% Conference/meeting rooms 2,005 3,607 + 79% Employee lockers 7,998 5,764 - 28% Residential: GRFA 14,462 23,457 + 62% Common area 2,662 6,910 + 159% Parking area 2,227 5,055 + 127% - Children's Ski School 5,863 0 N/A Private Club 0 4,170 iV/A General Common Area: Mechanical/Storage 1,790 3,680 + 105% Circulation 7,463 7,689 + 3% Restrooms 785 1.913 + 144% Base ILodge Total 65,950 82,779 + 27% Managed parking structure + 0 +59.380 iV/A 1tota! BuildiBlg Sqa9aB'e FmO$age 65,150 142,159 ¢ 918% • re Foo e b Floor 1985 1995 / °oChan ~ ~ Y ge First 28,131 30,097 + 7% Second 20,691 25,115 + 19% Third 13,190 18,339 + 39% Fourth 3.138 9.228 + 1 g7% TOTAL 65,150 82,779 ¢ 26% Square Footage by Dwellina Unit Unit 1 2,883 4,637 + 61% Unit 2 1,890 3,339 + 76% Unit 3 2,638 5,000 + 89% Unit 4 2,639 3,295 + 25% Unit 5 2,556 3,590 + 40% Unit 6 1.856 3.596 + 93% TOtaV Gff$FAe 14,462 23,457 + 62% Residential Common Area: +2.662 +6.910 + 159% T0ta8 ResidentaaB FCoor Area: 17,124 30,367 ¢ 76% f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 12 IV. CRITERIA TO BE USED IPI EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL The following criteria and findings shall be used in the evaluation of the proposed zone change ~ request (text amendments to Chapter 18.39-Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) and amendment to the previously approved development plan. A. Zone Change Criteria. 1. Suitability of the proposed zoning. Staff Response: The proposed amendments to the existing text of the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District are consistent with the purpose statement of the district and the permitted and conditional uses currently allowed. The uses on the first and second levels of the building are uses generally found in a ski mountain base facility. These uses include a restaurant, ski lockers, retail, meeting room/restaurant overflow, ticket sales, ski school and employee lockers. The applicant is requesting the additional use of a private club, serving as a private locker room and ski valet for its members. This use is similar to the other uses in the building and therefore, staff believes it is suitable. The applicant is also requesting that "indoor and outdoor ski storage" be added to the list of permitted uses for the site. This will allow for overnight ski storage at the bus shelter and other potential Iocations near the chair lift. 2. Is the amendment proposal presenting a convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal objectives? • Staff Response: Staff has reviewed the existing and proposed permitted and conditional uses in the Ski Base Recreation Zone District and believe that these uses are consistent with adjacent land uses and municipal objectives. The text changes being proposed by the applicant are minimal in nature and are simply intended to clarify and bring the text language up-to- date with today's standards. 3. Does the rezoning proposal provide for the growth of an orderly and vuable community? Staff Response: It is staff's opinion that the most significant element of the proposed text changes is the revision of the submittal requirements and the requirement of a new, or amended, development plan application. Bringing this language up-to-date with today's standards assures that more complete and accurate information will be provided for review by the Town staff and boards and the community. Vail Associates has been meeting with representatives of the East Village Homeowners Association for well over a year. Staff believes that this extra effort with the neighborhood has assured that the proposed application provides a convenient, workable relationship among land uses. ~ f:\everyone\pec\memos\gpeak.n27 13 4. Vs the proposed rezoning consistent with 4he Va61 Land IJse Plan? • StafiE Res op nse: Staff believes that the proposed text revisions to the Ski Base\ Recreation Zone District are consistent with the Vail Land Use Plan. The proposed changes do not alter the basic intent of the existing Ski Base/Recreation Zone District, which is in compliance with the Land Use Plan. B. Conformance with the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Staff has evaluated the proposal for compliance with the applicable elements of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan, including: 9. VaaB Lanc9 Use PBaeo Staff believes the proposed Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment would carry out the following goals identified in the Vail Land Use Plan: Goal 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance betvueen residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and permanent resident. Goal 1.3 The quality of development shoutd be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. ` Goal 2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day visitors. Goal 2.2 The ski area owner, the business community and the Town leaders should work together closely to make existing facilities and the Town function more efficiently. Goal 2.3 The ski area owrner, the business community and the Town leaders should work together to improve facilities for day skiers. Goal 2.4 The community should improve summer recreational and cultural opportunities to encourage summer tourism. Goal 2.5 The community should improve non-skier recreational options to improve year-round tourism. Goal 2.8 Day skier needs for parking and access should be accommodated through creative solutions such as: a) increased busing from out of town; b) expanded points of access to the mountain by adding additional base portals; c) continuing to provide temporary surface parking; and d) addition of structured parking. f:\everyone\pecMemos\gpeak.n27 14 2. Vail Village Master Plan , While Golden Peak may not always be considered to be a part of the Village, it is ~ included in the Vail Village Master Plan. The goals for Vail Village are summarized in six major goal statements. Each major goal focuses on a particular aspect of the Village community (promote healthy economy, environmental protection, etc.). Staff has listed each goal and the applicable objectives and policies that appear to be addressed by the proposed Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment. Goal 1 Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. 1.2 Objective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facifities. Goal 2 To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-round economic heaVth and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. 2.1 Objective: Recognize the variety of land uses found in the 10 sub- areas throughout the Village and allow for development that is compatible with these established land use patterns. 2.5 Objective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging antl commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. ~ 2.5.1 Policy: Recreational amenities, common areas, meeting facilities and other amenities shall be preserved and enhanced as a part of any redevelopment of lodging properties. Goal 3 To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of ,the walking experience throughout the Village. 3.1 Objective: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. 3.1.1 Policy: Private development shall incorporate streetscape improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways. 3.4 Objective: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible greenspace areas, including pocket parks and stream access. 3.4.2 Policy: Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as designated in the Vail Village Master Plan and/or the Recreation Trails Master Plan. • Goal 4 To preserve existing open space areas and expand greenspace opportunities. f:\everyone\pec\memos\gpeak.n27 15 4.1 Objective: Improve existing open space areas and create new plazas ~ with greenspace and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each xype of open space in forming the overall fabric of the Village. Goal 5 Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulation system throughout the Village. 5.1 Objective: Meet parking demands with public and private parking facilities. 5.1.5 Policy: Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide underground or visually concealed parking. 5.2 Objective: Encourage the use of public transportation to minimize the use of private automobiles throughout Vail. . 5.4 Objective: Improve the streeetscape of circulation corridors throughout the Village. Goal 6 To ensure the continued improvement of the vital operational elements of the Village. 6.1 Objective: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development. ~ Golden Peak is one of the 10 subareas identified in the Vail Village Master Plan. The specific concepts that describe the Golden Peak area serve as advisory guidelines for future land use decisions by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council. The Master Plan recognizes that the site will redevelop, given the approval of the 1985 redevelopment plan, with the statement: "Redevelopment will attract additional traffic and population into ihis area and may have significant impacts upon portions of Sub-Areas 6(East Gore Creek) and 7(East Village)." Staff believes the following concepts for the Golden Peak sub-area are carried out with this proposa(: Tennes couc4s ampacted by the redevelopment sha91 be re9ocated 'on the area (or an Ford Park)o The proposed redevelopment calls for the removal of the four tennis courts, which are currently located on the site. The tennis courts are operated by the Vail Recreation District (VRD) under the terms of a long-term land lease with VA. The VRD has agreed to release VA from the lease for monetary compensation, which the VRD will use to refurbish the existing courts at Ford Park. The VRD may also add one additional tennis court at the Ford Park complex. Commercaa9 activ6ty at 4his sote shoaald be limi4ed to "ska base/recreationaB°" uses. All commercial activity allowed in the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District, and proposed with the redevelopment plan, is limited to "ski base/recreational" uses. f:\everyone*nUnemoslgpeak.n27 16 Addi4ional parking for any facilities to be provided on site. Although the revised development plan wili provide mare tatal parking spaces than ~ currently exist on the site (short-term and long-term), which were approved with the 1985 plan, the spaces will not all be availabte to the public on a daily basis. As mentioned previously, if there are not sufficient pre-sales of club memberships, the 148 space parking structure may not be constructed. If this happens, the applicant has indicated that they will pay a parking pay-in-lieu fee to compensate for the loss of public parking that will result. Existing covenant restrictions in this sub-area would need 4o be addressed to allow 4or development. The restrictive covenants, entered into between VA and (generally) the East Village Homeowners Association at the time of the 1985 plan, control where and how development can occur on this property. The Association's consultant has been invoived in the development of this plan from its beginnings and has not expressed any concerns with regard to the proposal's non-compliance. Pedestrian improvements, such as sidewalks, are important to connect this sub- area to Ford Park and the soccer field. There is currently a sidewalk connecting Golden Peak through the Manor Vail property to Ford Park. This sidewalk connects to a path in Ford Park, however this path does not connect directly to the Ford Park parking area. The applicant is not proposing any improvements which would extend the pedestrian system directly to the Ford Park ~ parking area. Additionally, the applicant is not proposing to extend the sidewalk along Vail Valley Drive from the Children's Center to the soccer field parking area. Redevelopment of the Golden Peak base facility shall be low profile (2-3 stories) to minimize impacts on views to Vail Mountain. Although the Vail Village Master Plan recommends a building of not more than three stories, the maximum building height allowed by zoning (up to 40 feet) will allow for a four story building. The proposed base facility is four stories. While the building does conform to the maximum height requirements as defined by the zoning code, it does not comply with the sub-area concept of being low profile (2-3 stories). 3. Transportation Master Plan ' The Vail Transportation Master Plan, adopted in 1993, focused on all forms of transportation and developed a long-range implementation strategy for the transportation programs. The Plan is intended to guide the Town's decision-makers in developing a coordinated approach to implementing transportation improvements. The broad categories of the Plan that relate to Golden Peak include parking, the Town bus system, and trail system interface. The parking issue revolves around the parking supply and the parking demand. The existing supply of parking is fairly constant from day-to-day, however, the demand for parking varies, depending upon the season of the year, day of the week and the time of the day. ~ f:\everyone\pec\memos\gpeak.n27 17 Based on the existing supply of parking, the parking demand overflows the . parking structures and thereby requires parking on the Frontage Road, approximately six days per year. VVith the expansion of the ski mountain it is anticipated that there will be an increased demand for parking. Given this information, the following Master Plan goals are identified to meet the parking demands in the future: 0 The Town has determined that overflow demand for parking is acceptable 15 days per year. 0 Travel demand management (through bus service, ride sharing, and price controls) needs to be implemented to reduce parking demand. 0.. Provide reasonably priced parking to serve the visitor and discounted parking to serve the Vail resident and employee needs. 0 Provide limited premium service parking at a price commensurate with the value provided. 0 Identify candidate expansion areas for additional public parking to accommodate long-term demands associated with the potential ski area expansion. 0 Retain the private parking supply as an important and needed element. ~ The long-range parking concepts contained in the Master Plan that aim to meet the general parking demand include: 0 The existing Ford Park parking area should be considered for a possible two-level parking facility with one level provided below existing grade. 0 The existing VVest Day Lot and the fVorth Day Lot should also be considered, in conjunction with Vait Associates, for a possible two-level parking facility vuith one level partially depressed belovu existing grade. 0 The Golden Peak area, in particular the soccer/practice fields; the ski school/practice area; and the tennis courts and parking lot should be considered as potential parking expansion areas if the traffic impacts can be mitigated. Streetscape Iwaster P9aP9 Improvements in and around the Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment area are included in the "East Village" sub-area of the Streetscape Master Plan. This sub- area includes Vail Valley Drive, Hanson Ranch Road, East Gore Creek Drive and East Meadouv Drive. The East Village sub-area is predominantly made up of lodges and condominiums. Vehicular traffic is not restricted. The Golden Peak Ski Base facility and the Children's Center are at the center of the sub-area and are both major vehicular and pedestrian destinations. The Streetscape Master Plan recommends that the primary goal for this area is to provide an effective and safe pedestrian system, while accommodating the f:\everyone~pecVnemoslgpeak.n27 18 vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic. The Plan recognizes that traffic along Vail Valley Drive is very heavy throughout most of the year. It is especially heavy in ~ the morning and late afternoons during the ski season and evenings and weekends during the summer months. Vail Associates Ch'ildren's Center is a major source of vehicular congestion during the winter season, with parents dropping-off and picking-up children at the beginning and the end of each day. The Master Plan points out that the roadways throughout the East Village area are asphalt and are recommended to remain so. Concrete curb and gutter will be needed on Vail Valley Drive. This will be an appropriate treatment given the existing and proposed pedestrian and vehicular traffic in the area. There is a need for additional seating opportunities along the pedestrian system in the East Village area. Landscape treatments that might be proposed as a part of the Streetscape Master Plan will only address those areas where landscaping infill is needed. Additional lighting will be necessary along Vail Valley Drive. The streetscape improvement plan for the East Village focuses on the pedestrian corridors adjacent to the asphalt roadway (see attachments 5 and 6, which are the applicable maps from the Streetscape Master Plan). One of the Plan's goals is to direct pedestrians to key destination points such as the Golden Peak Ski Base facility, the Children's Center, Ford Park and the Ford Amphitheater, and the Village Core. No major changes to the vehicular circulation system or roadway are proposed for this sub-area. The Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment proposal includes the implementation of a number of elements identified in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan ~ (see attachment # 7 for a copy of the ApplicanYs Pedestrian/Streetscape Upgrade Plan). The recommended streetscape improvements for the East Village sub-area are listed below (in bold), followed by a staff analysis of how the applicanYs proposal carries out, or does not carry out, the recommendations in the Streetscape Master Plan. In addition to the improvements identified by Vail Associates, staff witl take a comprehensive view of all improvements needed to address neighborhood concerns. These include roadway and pedestrian improvements leading to the Golden Peak Ski Base, from Ford Park, the Village path, the connection to the Vista Bahn, Chalet Road, the soccer field, etc. Staff believes that the proposed redevelopment o4 the Golden Peak area offers a unique opportunity for the neighborhood, and the Town as a whole, to work together with Vail Associates to accomplish all of the recommendations suggested in the Streetscape IUlaster Plan. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicanYs Streetscape Upgrade Plan, which will be reviewed in conjunction with the Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment application, address all of the recommendations for the East Village sub-area (from the Vail Transportation Center to the Soccer Field), including various connections with existing and proposed pedestrian systems. A discussion of cost-sharing will be needed to establish each party's appropriate level of financial responsibility (VA, Town of Vail, neighborhood). Streetscape Master Plan Recommendation The Plan recommends sidewalks on both sides of the street along Vail Valley . Drive, from Blue Cow Chute to the entry to Manor Vail. The west and south f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 19 side shouBd be a concrete unBt paver vualkway, eught to ten feet wide and the east and north side should also be a coeacrete unit paver sidevNalk, five to sitt feet wisBe. Staff Analysis: Vail Associates is proposing to construct an eight-foot wide concrete paver walkuvay along the west and south sides of Vail Valley Drive. The walkway will be reduced to six feet in front of the Golden Peak site, in order to provide as much landscape buffering in front of the skier drop-off lot as possible. The applicant is then proposing that the walkway be further reduced in width to four feet along the Children's Center drop-off lot. As requested by the Town, a walkway is shown on the east and north sides of Vail Valley Drive, from the Gore Creek Bridge to Ramshorn. However, Vail Associates has stated it is not proposing to be responsible for improving this side of the street, as VA believes it is not directly related to the Golden Peak Redevelopment Project. IVo improvements are shown on the north side of Vail Valley Drive from Ramshorn to the Manor Vail entry, as suggested in the Streetscape Master Plan. Although the Streetscape Master Plan calls for concrete unit pavers to be used on the east side of Vail Valley Drive, a portion of this sidewalk has recently been constructed using concrete. The applicanYs design consultant has indicated that the paving material on this side of the road is as "yet to be determined," to allow for further discussion by the PEC and the Towrn Council. ~ Staff recommends that the sidewalk on this side of Vail Valley Drive be constructed of concrete unit pavers. Streetscape Master Plan Recommendation A9ong @lai6 VaB6ey Drive, from AAanor Vail's narth eratry to the soccer fietd, an efight to ten-foog wide concrete unit waBkway is recommeraded on the south side o4 the roatG. The P@an poants out that reta6ning w?alls wil9 be needed in some areas due 40 an 6nadequate raght-of-way and a hillside being immediately adjacent to the roadway. There 6s r?o sidevvalk proposeci for the north side of the street due to the tagh~ phys6caB constraints along the northerBy cight-of-way Bine. TBae Piaat recmmmends thaY a sidewalk/crosswaik salution wall be necessary $o provide safe pedestrian access through the Golden Peak bus turnarourac9 area. Staff P?naly,sis: Vail Associates is proposing to continue the pedestrian walkway on the south side of Vail Valley Drive as suggested in the Plan, from Manor Vail's north entry to a point just east of the Children's Center. As mentioned previously, the walkway in front of the Children's Center drop-off !ot is only four feet wide. Although Vail Associates is not proposing any streetscape improvements to the soccer field, it ~ has provided a plan depicting a sidewalk to the soccer field. This plan does not accurately depict the improvements recommended in the Streetscape Master Plan. f:\everyone\pecVnemos\gpeak.n27 20 Staff recommends that Vail Associates construct a six to eight foot wide sidewalk in front of the Children's Center drop-off lot and provide the Town with a ~ Streetscape Improvement Plan that accurately reflects the recommended improvements identified in the Master Pfan, from the Children's Center to the Soccer Field. StreetscaN Master Plan Recommendation The existing Vista Bahn/Gold Peak recreational trail and the pedestrian connection to Ford Park through Manor Vail will be used as a part of this sub-area's pedestrian system. Manor Vail's entry to Ford Park should include additioraaf signing or an entry statement. Staff Analysis: Vail Associates proposes additional signage at both ends of the Ford Park path in order to better inform the public as to the location of this pedestrian link between Golden Peak and one of its associated parking areas. These signs will be included in a comprehensive sign program that will be presented to the Design Review Board for its review and approval. Streetscape NBaster Plan Recommendation Additional minor pedestrian paths, either concrete or asphalt, are proposed as follows: An easUwest comnection between Vail Valley Drive and the existing ~ recreational trail west of the Tivoli. A path north of the tennis courts to the north entry of the Gold Pea9c ski base facility. Staff Analysis: The applicant's Streetscape Upgrade Plan does reflect a four foot wide asphalt path connecting Vail Vatley Drive to the existing recreation trail west of the Tivoli. As recommended in the Plan, Vail Associates is proposing to provide a path north of the tennis courts to the north entry of the Golden Peak Ski Base Facility. Streetscaqe Master Plan Recommendation Consider eliminating the win4er-time parking use on Chalet Road. Closure of the dead-end road and development of a pocket park/open space area should be pursued. Staff Analysis: Although the closure of Chalet Road and the development of a pocket park/open space area was a part of the 1985 development ptan, it is not proposed in conjunction with this redevelopment plan. For the past two ski seasons, the Town ~ has eliminated (by pfowing snow across the entry) the winter-time parking use on Chalet Road. f:\everyonelpecUnemos\gpeak.n27 21 Some residents in the neighborhood have expressed interest in closing Chalet ~ Road and converting it to a pocket park, however, there does not appear to be neighborhood consensus on this issue. Staff believes that it is appropriate to address this recommendation of the Streetscape Master Plan at a later date and not tie it to the Golden Peak redevelopment application. Streetscape Master Plan Recorrimendation Two srnal9 landscaped plazas are proposed at the south entry to Fork park and at the pount where Vail Valley Drive turns to the eas$ at AAill Creek Circle. On eaCh Case the un4ent us to Ceeate a $oCBB point that BCCents these IOCBtsOns. At the FoPa1 Patk entrance, a handicap drop-off as needec9 an addition to concrete ueuBt pavers, seating and landscaping. These irnprovements wrill increase the vis6bility and usefulness of this important access to Ford Park andl the PIa4uPe Center. A smal6 plaza w6th Bandscaping at the Vail Valley Drive/AAil9 Creek Circle 6ntersectBOn is entended to provide a"pivot point" for pedestrians moving metween the Nillage parking structure and the (aolden Peak ski base facility. Current9y there as no visual connection betweera these two facilities. Ira order to d6scourage aannecessary vehicular traffic on Mil9 Creek Circle, consiaierat6on should be given to narrowBng the intersection with Vail Valley • DB'9!!e. Staff Analysis: At the Ford Park entrance, a handicap drop-off has been provided by the Town of Vail. This improvement has increased the visibility and usefulness of this important access to Ford Park and the Nature Center. VVith regard to the plaza at the intersection of Vail Valley Drive and Mill Creek Circle, the proposal from Vail Associates indicates that the entire corner area will be paved (concrete unit pavers) with landscaping provided south of the plaza area. Additionally, three benches are depicted. Staff feels that the plaza at the intersection of Vail Valley Drive and Mill Creek Circle should be designed as suggested in the Streetscape Master Plan. This Plan shows the sidewalk angling away from Vail Valley Drive in order to provide small landscape islands at the corners of the intersection with Mill Creek Circle. The Plan also shows a landscape island in the center of the plaza. Staff believes that additional work should be done on this element of the plan to make this focal point more aesthetically pleasing to users and passers-by. A design similar to Mayor's Park which is located at the intersection of Vail Road and VVest Meadow Drive would seem to be an appropriate example of the type of improvements that should be provided in this area. f:\everyone\pec\memos\gpeak.n27 22 Streetscape Master Plan Recommendation It is proposed that the Children's Center bus stop be relocated to the • northeast of the Golden Peak ski base facility for two reasons: 1) congestion caused by heavy drop-off traffic at the present location causes delays for buses and; 2) the proposed location provides better access for summer events in Ford Park. A pedestrian crosswalk from the relocated bus stop to the Manor Vail/Ford Park path will be necessary. Staff Analysis: After several meetings with Town of Vail staff, Vail Associates staff and neighborhood representatives, it was determined that the best location for the bus stop is where it is currently located, between the Children's Center and the base lodge. This location promotes the use of the bus system by providing bus riders with the best access to the ticket windows, the Children's Center and the ski lifts. A pedestrian crosswalk, to the Manor Vail/Ford Park path has been provided with the new redevelopment plan in the same location as is suggested in the Master Plan. Additionally, Vail Valley Drive will be relocated in front of Manor Vail to improve site distances and provide a safer driveway intersection with Vail Valley Drive. Streetscape Master Plan Recommendation The westbound bus stop that is presently located on Vail Valley Drive near ~ the bridge over Gore Creek is recommended to be eliminated at the request of area residents and to reduce vehicular/bus congestion. The eastbound stop at the Garden of the Gods will remain. Staff Analysis: The Plan proposed by the applicant shows the removal of the bus stop as suggested in the Streetscape Master Plan. Ultimately, the Town Council will have to make the final decision to remove the bus stop. Streetscape Master Plan Recommendation . Landscaping, lighting and site furnishings should be included where possible as the streetscape improvements are made. All bus stops and feature areas should provide a full compliment of site furnishirags. Staff Analysis: The applicanYs plan shows that "Village" light fixtures will be provided on the west side of Vail Valley Drive (from the Transportation Center to the Mill Creek Circle Plaza). These lights will then continue along the south side of Vail Valley Drive in front of the Golden Peak Ski Base, east to the Children's Center. ~ i f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 23 A nevu landscape planter is proposed in front of the Vorlaufer and at the corner of ~ Hanson Ranch Road. Three streetscape benches are shown at the Mill Creek Circle Plaza. Staff recommends that "Village" light fixtures be provided on both sides of the entire length of Vail Valley Drive. S4reetscape Master Plan Recommendation Recon#igurung the parking at the Vorlaufer to provide for a pedestrian walkway mn the wes4 sude of Vai9 Valley Drive. Of the 12 existing spaces, tvvo "gaaesq" parkBng spaces for the Vorlaufer may need #o be relocated to the eas4 side of Vail Val6ey Dreve. The final design shall ensure that there 6s no net 9oss of parking spaces for the Vorlaufer. Staff Analysis: The current proposal allows for the addition of an eight foot wride pedestrian walkway on the. wrest side of Vail Valley Drive and maintains the existing 12 parking spaces in front of the Vorlaufer. There is no need to relocate two guest parking spaces to the east side of Vail Valley Drive, as suggested in the Plan. The reconfiguration of parking spaces, however, vuill require modifications to the existing planters and retaining walls in the area. Stree4scape Master Plan Recommendation ~ W6denang of the Vail Valley Drave bridge over Gore Creek to better accommodate the proposed pedesirian waikwrays. Staff Analysis: The applicant's plans show that the bridge will be widened to accommodate an eight-foot wide walkway on the west side and a four-foot wide walkway on the east side. Streetscape Master Plan Recommendati n Add a "neck down" at the east end of Fianson Ranch Road (at VaiB Valley Dreve)o 4his narrowing of the roadway siiscourages unnecessary traffic and provides aea opportun64y for additional landscapinge Staff Analysis: The applicant is proposing to carry out this recommendation of the Streetscape Master Plan. surnmam In summary, staff believes that the applicant has provided drawings which accomplish a number of elements recommended in the Town's Streetscape ~ Master Plan. However, as mentioned previously, there are certain elements included in the applicant's Streetscape Upgrade Plan that are contradictory to the f:\everyone\pec\memoslgpeak.n27 24 recommendations in the Streetscape Master plan, including: 1) The proposed plaza at the corner of Vail Valley Drive and Mill ~ Creek Circle is not designed as suggested in the Streetscape Master Plan. 2) The sidewalk in front of the Children's Center is four feet wide, rather than the 8-10 feet suggested in the Streetscape Master Plan. 3) The sidewalk to the Soccer Field is not designed as suggested in the Streetscape Master Plan, nor proposed to be constructed by the applicant. 5. Recreation Trails Master Plan In May 1988, the Town of Vail completed and adopted the Vail Recreation Trails Master Plan. This Master Plan is intended to help guide the Town's development of its recreational trails system for the foreseeable future. The goals and objectives of this Master Plan are as follows: • Identify problems and deficiencies in the existing trail system; • Identify who uses the trail system, what their needs are and who can safely share trails; • Identify where trails are needed and which trail segments should be constructed first; ~ • Develop a master plan that will allow for all types of non-motorized use in a safe, efficient manner; and • Produce a final report that will be a working document and a resource book for the staff. That portion of the Master Plan which identifies the shortcomings of the existing trails in the Town of Vail states that Vail Valley Drive, from the Golden Peak Ski Base east to the athletic field, is an area of concern. The combination of a narrow road and heavy use by cars, bikes, and pedestrians makes this section of on-road trail very congested and often hazardous. Improvements which move the non- motorized uses out of the travel lanes will help alleviate the problem. These could take the form of widened shoulders or a physically separated trail if the right-of- way is wide enough. The Master Plan recommends that bike lanes be added to each side of Vail Valley Drive and be four to five feet wide (depending on the shoulder availability). Each bike lane should be one-way and move with traffic. Although not intended for pedestrian use of the bike lanes, limited use by joggers, rollerbladers etc. should be anticipated since this will be the only path available in many areas. The implementation section of the Master Plan provides design details for trails and associated improvements, (i.e. signs, retaining walls, etc.). The Master Plan recommends that timber retaining walls, when designed and constructed correctly, are adequate and can be used. However, there are wall systems now on the market that can be erected easily by Town staff that are more durable. While ~ such systems may be more expensive initially, their longer life expectancy should f:\everyone*c\nemos\gpeak.n27 25 offset the higher cost. In high profile areas, such as along Vail Valley Drive, more • decorative walls should be considered. Concrete walls faced with stone or dry- layed stone walls should be explored as an option. The Master Plan points out that the final design of the trails system is unity. Materials and color should be simple and repeated throughout the system. The crispness of the detailing will be the most noticeable characteristic to the visitor. Vail has a reputation for quality design that should be upheld in the design and construction of its recreational trail system. The proposed implementation portion of the Master Plan suggests three different types of trail systems associated with the Golden Peak redevelopment application (see attachment 8, Figure 19 of the Recreation Trails Master Plan). The Master Plan shows that an off street/pedestrian trail should be located directly through the Golden Peak Ski Base property from the Mill Creek Circle/Vail Valley Drive intersection to iVorthwoods and Pinos Del fVorte Condominiums to the east. This path runs east to west and is located on the south side of the ski base, Children's Center, and Ski Club Vail buildings. The second type of trail associated with Golden Peak is a pedestrian path, which the Plan recommends the upgrading and widening of the Vail Trail, which leads from Golden Peak to the east. The third type of trail through the Golden Peak area is a four to five foot vuide bike lane on each side of Vail Valley Drive. The proposed rec9eveloprnent of the Golden Peak Sk6 Base appears to carry ou4 a naumber of the cecoratmendations in the Recreation Trails Master Plara. Specifically, a new 4railhead sign wilB be constructed and the Vail Trail is ~ intended tm be extended through the Goldera Peak property to the west. The applucaeot has indicated that the exact alignment of the Vail Trail extension be contingent upon U.S. Forest Service approval of their summer mountaira bike and pedestrian plara. The ienprovements 4o Vaii VaBley DrBve, recomrnended 6n the Master Plan from the Children's Center to the east, are not proposed to be accompiishec8 iro conjunction with the Golden Peak application, as it is the appGocant's opinion that the redevelopment of Golden Peak does not have any relationship to the need for pedestriara improvements along Vail Valley Drive east of the ChBldrero's Center. Staff recommerads tha4 the Vail Trail extension to the west be completed, prBor go the ossuance of a Temporary Certificate ot Occupancy for the Golden Peak baaiod'ong and that the applicant provide the drawings necessary for the Town to coaas$raact a sidewa9k $rorn the Children's Cen4er to the Soccer Field. 6. Comprehensive Opera Lands Plan On March 11, 1994, the Town of Vail completed and adopted the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. The objectives of the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan are: 0 To identify citizen and visitor needs and preferences for a comprehensive system of open space uses such as parks, recreation, protection of environmental resources, trails and reserve lands for public use; 0 To prioritize available open lands for protection; f:\everyone\pecMemos\gpeak.n27 26 • To identify creative strategies to implement the acquisition and protection program; ~ • To define a management system to appropriately manage Town-owned open space lands; and • To buffer neighborhoods with open space. The recommendations contained in the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan that are applicable to the proposed Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment are as follows: ~ Adding an extensive new trail system that essentially surrounds the Town and provides an interface with the National Forest system lands and Vail Mountain. The proposed trail system is somewhat similar to trail systems found in the Alps, where interconnected trails allow hikers to move around and to mountain villages. ~ The Golden Peak area should be used as a trailhead to access both mountain trails and the Vail Trail. • Add three "trailheads" in the core areas to access Vail Mountain trails and inform visitors of trail opportunities. • Golden Peak is identified as an "activity center." These centers are activity areas where people are likely to gather or chose as a destination. Connections must then be provided that tie various activity centers throughout Town together through a series of bicycle and pedestrian trails. ~ ~ It is a high priority for the Town to obtain a public use agreement with VA to maintain access to all existing and proposed trail systems through the Golden Peak property. Additionally, the extension of the Vail Trail to the west is a high priority. • Paved shoulders on Vail Valley Drive should be provided for a safer recreational path east of the core area. The current right-of-way is too narrow for complete bike lanes on either side, but paved shoulders will make the recreation path significantly safer and easier to use for both drivers and cyclists, in-line skaters and pedestrians. Staff believes that the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base carries out a number of the recommendations in the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. Specifically, a new trailhead sign will be constructed and the Vail Trail is proposed to be extended through the Golden Peak property to the west. C. Development Plan Standards and Criteria Chapter 18.39.120 establishes the criteria by which a proposed development plan for the Ski Base Recreation Zone District will be evaluated. The development plan shall meet each of the following standards or demonstrate that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved: ~ f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 27 1. The deve9oper waBV provade a buffer zone in areas where the Ske Base/Recreation ~ district boundary os adjacent to a residential use district boundaoy. The buffer zone must be Bcept free of buildings or strucfures and must be landscaped, screened to protect 6t by natura6 featccres so that adverse eifects on the surrounding areas are minarnozed. This may require a buffer zone of sufficient size to adequately separate the proposed use from the surrounding properties Bn Berms of vBsual privacy, nobse, adequate 9ight, air, aur po6lution, s6gnage and other comparable poeentiaily 9EVCOmpat9bIe $aC$OPS. Staff ReSpOP9Se° The revised development plan indicates that a buffer area has been provided where the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District boundary is adjacent to a residential use district boundary. Specifically, along the western property line, where the Golden Peak property is adjacent to the residential lots along Mill Creek Circle, the applicant has provided a setback of 210 feet to the base lodge. There is significant landscaping proposed along this edge, writh consideration given to the impact on views that additional landscaping may create. In addition, the majority of the activity on the property will occur in and around the base lodge, which is located on the northeast corner of the property, adjacent to Vail Valley Drive. The applicant is proposing to relocate the poma lift from the west side of the property to ~ an area behind the Children's Center. This will further increase the buffer between the Golden Peak facility and the residential lots to the west. The top of Chair 12 will move 230' to the west, but staff does not believe that this will create any negative impacts on adjoining residential properties. Properties across Vail Valley Drive will have a landscape buffer to partially shield the, skier drop-off area from the neighborhood. This landscape buffer will reduce noise and other impacts caused by the drop-off. As mentioned previously, the 148-space parking structure has been entirely buried, with the exception of the vehicular and pedestrian entrances, and additionally screened with landscape plantings. 2. A c6rcuVa$ion system designed for 4he type ofi traffic generated, taking into consideration safety, separatiora frorn living areas, converaience, access, noise, ansi exhaaast controV: Pcavate iraterna9 streets enay be permiYted 'of they can be used by police and fire department vehicies for emergency purposes. Bicycle trafific shal9 be coeasBdered andl provided vvhera the site 6s to be used for residential purposese Sgaff Response° The proposed redevelopment plan attempts to reduce congestion in the public skier drop- off and the Children's Center drop-off areas. There are currently 21 head-in parking spaces located immediately west of the Chifdren's Center. The proposed redevelopment plan includes 30 short -term spaces located on the inside curve of the relocated bus drop- off lane. Although Vail Associates' traffic consultant recommended a total of 33 - 36 spaces, it would appear that site limitations are such that only 30 spaces are all that can be provided. f:\everyone\pec\memos\gpeak.n27 28 Although some PEC members have raised concerns about children crossing the bus lane, staff believes the area will function safely as designed. The bus drivers for the in- ~ town shuttle are accustomed to driving in a pedestrian oriented environment, and will use caution in that area. A barrier will be placed between the bus lane and the drop-off area to encourage people to cross only in the designated area (which will be ideniified with pavement striping). As identified in the Operational Management Plan, during Peak Periods both drop-off areas will be staffed with Vail Associates employees to assist in traffic flow. The public skier drop-off area located on the north side of the building will serve as an access point to three other traffic uses; the parking structure, the delivery area, and the residential condominium entry. Staff believes this area will handle the traffic generated by these uses. The parking structure will generate traffic, but due to the location of its entry/exit portal on the far west end, the traffic should not intertere with the function of the drop-off area. The only exhaust fans from the parking structure will be above the vehicular entrance and will vent toward the south. The condominiums will not generate a large volume of traffic and will not interfere with the public skier drop-off area. The delivery area witl be used during non-peak hours, as defined in the Operational Management Ptan, therefore staff believes its impacts will be minimal. The existing bike path south of the base lodge is proposed to be relocated, but will provide for continuous access through the site (connecting to Vail Valley Drive, east of ~ Ski Club Vail, and to the Village path to the west). As mentioned previously, the Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment proposal includes the implementation of a number of elements identified in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan. Additionally, Vail Valley Drive is proposed to be reconstructed and straightened in order to improve site distances along this heavily used portion of the road. 3. Functional opero space in terms of: optimum preservation of natural features (including trees and drainage areas), recreation, vievds, convenience, and function; Staff Response: The open spaces on this property are both formal and informal. The existing ski runs allow for both winter and summer activity. While serving primarily as an access for skiing, Golden Peak will also serve as a trailhead for the Vail Trail and access to biking and hiking trails on Vail Mountain. The Golden Peak base facility is also used #or both winter and summer special events. A temporary tent will be located near the ski race lanes for special events during the ski season, and during the summer. Some trees will be removed to accommodate for the realignment of Chair 6 and the addition of a race course lane. The applicant has proposed to mitigate the removal of trees by planting 10'-12' tall evergreens and 3"-6" caliper aspen trees around the new base facility. ~ f:\everyone~pec\memos\gpeak.n27 29 The existing Mill Creek diversion that runs through the property is proposed to be ~ culverted an additional 370 feet. This will allow for regrading to occur, and it will provide for flood control, as well. The Environmental Impact Report has not been approved by the Town Engineer or the Senior Environmental Policy Planner. Staff is recommending that no Building Permit be issued for the redevelopment project until the report is updated/modified and approved by the Town. Views from surrounding properties will not be detrimentally impacted with this new building. Generally, the proposed base lodge building will be no higher than the building approved in 1985. 4e barBety in terms o$e houssng type, densities, facilities and opera space9 Staff Res onsee Variety is achieved through the many uses located within the base lodge building. The facility will include ski lockers, restaurant and retail space; lockers for employees; club space for members; meeting rooms for ski events, community meetings and restaurant overtlovv and six residential dwelling units. VUhile there is no variety in terms of housing types or densities proposed on the Golden Peak site; Vail Associates has committed to continue to vuork with the Town to provide affordable housing for employees. In April 1995, the Town of Vail and Vail Associates entered into an agreement to manage • peak periods. In this agreement, the Town and VA acknowledged the ongoing commitment to foster adequate employee housing within the Town of Vail. VA and the Town renewed their commitment to explore other opportunities, to strive to replace employee housing that has been taken off the market, and to work in a comprehensive fashion with the Vail Housing Authority. In addition, VA specifically pledged to participate with the TOV in making the Vail Commons affordable housing project a reality. Due to the competitive nature of the Vail Commons developer selection, assistance from VA has not been needed. Although not yet constructed, all agreements have been executed and ground breaking for Vail Commons is anticipated soon. Staff believes that VA should transfer the commitment that was intended to be invested in the Vail Commons project to the next Town housing project. At this time, the Town believes that the next project is likely to target seasonal workers and that VA could have a greater role to play in making the project a reality. Therefore, staif recornmends that as a condition of approda9 for tFae Go9den Peak Sk6 Base, Vai! Associates patticipate in 4he next Torwn of Vai0 housing proflect, uov accordance with the existing agreement adentifsed in the TO!!/!!A agreemen4. 5e Pravacb in 4erms of the needs of: individuals, famil6es and neighbors; Staff Resp nse VVith the exception of the neuv condominium units, the newr base facility, and accompanying activity, will occur awray from adjacent residential properties and should not interfere with their privacy. f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 30 The private condominium entrance will afford some level of privacy for these owners and their guests. The residential dwellings are located on the third and fourth floors and are ~ distinctly separated from the public areas of the building. 6. Pedestrian traffic in terms of: safety, separation, convenience, access to points of destination, and attractiveness; Staff Response• One of the most important off-site improvements that will occur with this redevelopment is the addition of an eight-foot wide sidewalk, on the west side of Vail Valley Drive from the Vail Transportation Center to Golden Peak. The sidewalk will be completed in conformance with the Vail Streetscape Master Plan, as discussed previously in this memorandum. On-site, there are sidewalks proposed along Vail Valley Drive in front of the base facility and the Children's Center. Staff recommends that the six-foot wide sidewalk along Vail Valley Drive be extended along the road at the Children's Center drop-off, instead of the four-foot wide walkway currently proposed. This will require the reduction of aisle width and parking space length, in order to gain enough space for the expanded walkway and a landscape buffer. The applicant has proposed to improve the pedestrian connection at the Manor Vail north entry. Vail Associates will close off the dangerous sidewalk, located just south of this entry, and create a landscape barrier to encourage people to use the sidewalk and crosswalk at the north Manor Vail entrance. • 7. Building type in terms of: appropriateness to density, site relationship, and bulk. Staff Resppnse: Staff continues to have concerns regarding the mass and bulk of the proposed structure. We acknowledge the fact that the applicant is attempting to work within the "covenant boundaries" according to the approved 1985 plan. The program elements within the building have changed significantly since 1985. The overall square footage of the structure is significantly larger than what was approved by the Town in 1985. Approximately 17,629 sq. ft., an increase of 27%, has been added to the structure. While staff acknowledges the applicant's need for the additionat square footage for the ski related uses, we feel that the applicanYs desire to accommodate the additional square footage within the same "1985 building envelope" is creating a rather large, boxy structure. The architecYs attempts to break up the boxiness of the structure has been successful on many portions of the elevations, however, the staff continues to be specifically concerned with the north and east elevations. Due to the lower natural grade elevation along the north, the building reads as a four-story structure in this area. This also occurs on a portion of the eastern elevation. Staff recommends that the applicant consider stepping the building back, on the third and fourth floors, on these sides of the building. We believe that this would reduce the mass and bulk of the building from the two areas of the site which are proposed to receive the largest number of g uests. ~ f:\everyone\pec\memos\gpeak.n27 31 Bea an atternpt to further monirnize the mass and bulk o$ the build6ng, staff w?ould • recommerad that the large, third floor dormers on the east and south elevations be paa@Bed back. We be9seve that this would provide more of a pedestrian scale to the east and soutb eledations and we believe if would not compromise 4he interior spaces (GRFA) of the condoenanaurns. Overall, staff believes that the emphasis of the new Golden Peak base lodge should be placed on its public uses, as opposed to its residential functions. The purpose statement of the Ski Base/Recreation zone district states that this district: "is intended to provide for the base facilities necessary to operate the ski mountain and to allowr multi-family residential dwellings as a secondary use if certain criteria are met." VVhile the residential portion of the building may be comprised of less overall square footage than the base facility operations, the character of the building appears to be predominately residential. Additionally, staff believes that the residential decks overhanging the public areas will increase unwanted shading in those areas. 8. Larodscaping o$ the to4aB site 6n terms of: purposes, types, maintenarace, suitaba664y, and effect on fhe neighborhood. Staff Response: The landscape plan is designed to act as a buffer between differing uses occurring on the ~ site. The most heavily planted areas are along the west and north sides of the site, near the public skier drop-off area and the proposed underground parking structure. The buffer betvveen Vail Valley Drive and the skier drop-off area is an eight-foot wide landscaped berm. A mixture of nine coniferous and 24 deciduous trees are proposed in this area. The proposed underground parking garage also includes a heavily landscaped berm in front of the north-facing wall of the building. The 20-foot wide berm between the skier drop-off area and the north wall of the parking garage contains a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees and shrubs. The plaza on the south side of the building, however, is relatively void of plantings. The residential entry to the building, as well as the east elevation, is proposed to contain fewer trees than on the western and northern sides of the building as there is less room for planting. The Children's Center parking area contains the least amount of buffering and trees on the site. Additionally, the Public Works Department is concerned about sight distances, therefore many of the trees shown on the applicanYs landscape plan may need to be removed or relocated from this area. The top of the parking structure will contain a variety of plant materials. No activities are planned for this area, and it is intended to be naturally landscaped. In order to break up the west eleva4oon of the base 9odge, staff recomrnends that additional evergreero 4rees be added to the area between the parkang structure and the main building. Staff a9so Pecommends 4hat the Planning and Environmental Comrnission and the Des6gn Review Board take a detai9ed Sook at the overall plara to deterrnine if ghere are oppoctunlt6es $or additional landscaping, especially in the Ch6ldren's Center drop-off aote f:\everyone~pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 32 D. Criteria for Approving.the Multi-Family Dwellings As required in Chapter 18.39.010 (D,2) of the Ski Base\Recreation Zone District, before acting on . the proposed multi-family dwelling units, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following Conditional Use Permit factors in regard thereto: 1. Relationship and ienpacts of the use on the development objectives of the Town. Staff Response: As identified previously in this memorandum, the proposed Golden Peak redevelopment will carry out numerous recommendations for improvements as identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plans. It woufd not appear that the residential portion of the redevelopment project would have any negative effect on the development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks, and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. Staff Response: As indicated in the TDA and RRC studies, the Golden Peak redevelopment will have a significant effect on the distribution of the skiing population among the four major portals to Vail Mountain. It is believed that the proposed Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment ~ will double the current uphill capacity of this particular portal. The applicant has indicated that the mode of arrival most likely to see increased use will be the way of mass transportation and pedestrian usage. They have also provided information which indicates that, because of the managed nature of the parking structure, traffic impacts associated with the redevelopment proposal will be significantly less than that which occurs currently, as a result of the loss of the public parking lot that exists on the site. Additionally, because of the expanded and improved Children's Center and general skier public drop-off areas, staff believes that these transportation facilities will function significantly better than they currently do. Although staff believes the managed parking structure will result in reduced vehicular trips on Vait Valley Drive, we are concerned with the location of the attendant booth at the enirance to the structure. In its current location the booth is visible and allows for the possibility of the public believing that the structure is open to the public on a daily basis. Staff recommends that the booth be relocated in the structure, or removed from the structure. As mentioned previously, VA is proposing to implement a number of the streetscape improvements which they believe are directly related to the Golden Peak redevelopment. These improvements will encourage the expanded use of the pedestrian system throughout Town and have a positive effect on the reduction of vehicular traffic in the neighborhood. Overall, the proposed redevelopment of Golden Peak area is a positive improvement that should assure Vail's continued standing as North America's premier ski resort and mountain community. • f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 33 9 3. Effect upon $raffac, with particular reference to congestion, automotBve ~ and pec9esqrian safety arad convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maeoeuverability, and remova9 of snouv $rorn the streets and pack6ng area. Staff Response° As mentioned in response to the criteria listed above, staff believes that the Golden Peak redevelopment will have a positive impact on traffic congestion, automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access and maneuverability. Although it is difficult to estimate how well the new portal will function in terms of the above listed criteria, VA has supplemented their application with an Operational Management Plan which allows for continued monitoring and amendments to be made to address concerns that are not abie to be predicted through design. With regard to snow removal, the applicant has provided a snow removal plan and has included the management of snow removal in the Operational Management Plan. 4. Effect upon the character of the area Bn which the proposeal use is to be 9ocaged, one6ud'ong the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relaYion $o surrounding uses. Staff Response° VVith the exception of the single family homes along Mill Creek Circle, the Golden Peak Ski Base facility is surrounded by large multi-family residential buildings. ~ Although the proposed building does appear to be in scale with the multi-family buildings surrounding it, staff continues to have concerns with certain elements of the building itself. As mentioned previously, the protective covenants untler which the applicant is attempting to work, appear to provide artificial limitations to the property, severely constricting the creativity of design. The applicant is attempting to fit substantially more square footage into a building envetope that is very similar to the plan approved in 1985, on vuhich the protective covenants are based. Staff believes that too much emphasis of the newr Golden Peak Base lodge is be+ng placed on its residential functions, as opposed to its public uses. This appears to be contrary to the purpose statement in the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District. Staff is recommending that the PEC, Town Council and Design Review Board continue to try and reduce the scale and bulk of the building, including the expansive deck areas and unnecessary dormers over those decks. Additionally, staff believes that the south and east sides of the building need considerably more work to bring the building down to a more pedestrian scale. In addition to the four criteria listed above, the PEC shall make the findings set forth in Section 18.60.060B (Findings for Conditional Use Permits) before permitting multi-family units vvithin the main building. These required findings are as follows: 1e That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of this title and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 34 . 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this titie. • V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the Criteria and Findings identified in Section tV of this memorandum, staff recommends approval of the Golden Peak Ski Base redevelopment application and the Zoning Code text amendments with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment, the applicant shall be required to enter into a Developer Improvement Agreement with the Town. This will insure that the proposed on and off-site public improvements associated with this project are completed in conjunction with the redevelopment. 2. If the proposed 148-space parking structure is not able to be constructed during the same construction season as all of the other improvements at the Golden Peak site, the applicant shall be required to return to the PEC, or DRB, with a regrading/revegetation plan for the area. And, as already committed to by the applicant, the applicant shall meet with the Vail Town Council to discuss payment of parking pay-in-lieu fees for the loss of on-site parking. 3. Staff recognizes that changes to the project may occur at the Town Council and final Design Review Board stages of this redevelopment application review. However, once final Design Review Board approval has been granted, any substantial changes to the project will be required to be returned to the PEC and possibly Town Council for additional review and approval. ~ 4. Rather than participating in the provision of affordable housing associated with the Vail Commons project, as committed to in the Town of Vail/VA Growth Management Agreement, staff recommends that VA transfer their commitment to the next Town of Vail affordable housing project. 5. Staff recommends that the PEC, DRB and Town Council review the final architectural design and detailing of the building, specifically with regard to the criteria identified previously in this memo related to the building's bulk and mass. 6. The final streetscape and bus lane designs must be reviewed and approved by the Pubiic Works and Community Development Departments prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the project. 7. The Environmental Impact Report must be revised/updated and approved by the Town, including the Mill Creek Geological Hazard Analysis, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the project. 8. The Mill Creek Circle Plaza must be designed in a manner more closely matching the design identified in the Streetscape Master Plan. 9. The aisle widths in the Children's Center parking lot must be reduced in order to accommodate a minimum six foot wide sidewalk along Vail Valley Drive in front of the parking area. Town Engineer approval is required. ~ f:\everyone~pecUnemos\gpeak.n27 35 t 0 10. The Vaii Trail extension must be constructed from its current terminus, located ~ behind the Children's Center, to the western edge of the Vail Associates property prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the base lodge facility. 11. The design of the seasonal tent proposed to be located near the ski race course finish area must be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to its placement on the property. 12. A comprehensive sign program for all on and off-site signage in the area of Golden Peak must be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the project. 13. The attendant booth currently shown at the entrance to the managed parking structure must be removed, or relocated as discussed in the memo. 14. Staff recommends several improvements to the landscape plan, howrever, since the landscape plan requires Design Review Board final approval, these comments can be addressed at that time. ~ f:\everyone\pecUnemos\gpeak,n27 36 ~ a ATTACHfVIEIVT #1 ~ Chapter 18.39 GOIL~~~ PEABC SKI BASE/RECREATIOfV DISTRICT Sections: 18.39.010 Purpose. 18.39.030 Permitted uses. 18.39.050 Conditional uses. 18.39.070 Accessory uses. 18.39.080 Location of business activity. 18.39.090 Development plan required. 18.39.110 Development plan - Contents. 18.39.120 Design Dede9opmenq Standards / Criteria for evaluation. 18.39.130 Lot area. 18.39.150 Setbacks. 18.39.170 Height. 18.39.180 Density control. 18.39.190 Site coverage. 18.39.210 Landscaping and site development. .18.39.230 Parking. 18.39.010 Purpose. The GoBden Peak ski base/recreation district is intended to provide for the base facilities ~ necessary to operate the ski mountain and to allow multi-family residential dwellings as a secondary use if certain criteria are met. In addition, summer recreational uses and facilities are encouraged to achieve multi-seasonal use of some of the facilities and provide for efficient use of the facilities. (Ord.38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39,030 Permatted uses. A. The following uses shall be permitted within the nmin base Bocige building in the Golden Peak ski base/recreation district: . 1. Ski lockers/employee locker rooms. 2. Ski school and ski patrol facilities. 3. Lift ticket sales. . 4. Ski repair, rental, sales and accessories. 5. Restaurant/bar/snack bar/candy sales. 6. Meeting rooms for owner use and community-oriented organizations. 7. Injury prevention and rehabilitation facilities for owners' use. 8. Basket rental 9. Special community events. 1 Y -1 B. Retail and meeting room space limitation. 1. Retail sales space, , in the first two floors shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen percent of the non-residential gross • square footage of the niain base lodge building. Under Section 18.39.030, retail shall be defined as , candy sales, ski repair/rental sales, alid accessories and clothing, and basket rental, ski lockers and storage for the public. 2. Meeting rooms shall be limited to a maximum of #tve ten percent of the non- , residential gross square footage of the main building. C. Multi-family dwelling units within the niain base lodge building if the following requirements are met: 1. The dwelling units shall be a secondary use within the nmiin base lodge building if they meet the following criteria:. a. No residential use on ground level. • b. Visual impacts such as surface parking for the dwelling units shall be minimized by providing at least forty percent of the required parking within the nraiR base lodge building or in an attached parking structure. c. The maximum gross residential floor area (GRFA) devoted to dwelling units shall not exceed thirty percent of the total gross square footage of the base lodge building. 2. Before acting on multi-family dwelling units, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors in regard thereto: a. Relationship and impacts of the use on development objectives of the town. b. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks, and recreational facilities, and other public • facilities and public facilities needs. c. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. d. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 3. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the findings set forth in Section 18.60.060 B before permitting multi-family units within the niaift base lodge building. D. Permitted uses within the-seeendary+ Children's Ski School building: 1. Year-round child care and children's ski school and appurtenant recreational facilities and programs. 2. Children's ski school services and programs. 3. Community events and programs. 4. Summer recreational programs. E. The following uses shall be permitted outside the fma+A-build+ng base lodge and Children's Ski School buildings as shown on the approved development plan: 1. Ski trails, slopes and lifts; 2 • ~ Q 2. Snowmaking facilities; 3. Bus and skier dropoff; • 4. Surface parking lot; 5. Ski racing facilities; 6. Public parks, tennis and volleyball courts, and playing fields, playgrounds; 7. Vllater-treatment and storage facilities buildings; 8. Mountain storage buildings; , 9. Ski school activities; 10. Special community events; 11. Food and beverage service; 12. Ondoor and oantdoor ski storage. (Ord.28 (1988) § 1: Ord. 6(1988) § 1: Ord. 38 (1988) § 1. 18.39.050 Conditional uses. A. The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the GoBdeea Peak ski base/recreation district, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60: 1. Recreation room/minor arcade. 2. Addition or expansion of storage buitdings for mountain equipment. 3. Summer outdoor storage for mountain equipment. 4. Redevelopment of vuater storage extraction and treatment facilities. 5. Redevelopment of ski racing facilities. 6. Redevelopment of public parks, playgrounds. 7. Summer seasonal community offices and programs. 8. Adda4ions op eupansions of public or private parking structures or spaces. ~ 9. Seasonal structures to accommodate athletic, cultural, or educational activities. 10. Redevelopment of ski lifts and tows. 11. Food and beverage cart vending. 12. Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 18.58.310. 13. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060; 14. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. 15e Pub9ac, pr6eate or quas6-pubBic clubs. B. ..i f .~.a. . • ~ ~ 3 i 1 ~ 18.39.070 Accessory Uses The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Golden Peak ski/base recreation d istrict: . A. Accessory uses customarily incidental to permitted and conditional uses and necessary for the operation thereof. B. Home occupations, subject to the issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) i . 1 l n..a..C'i LCi:t 3....iI1G....7 ....a..6.1:..4..n....a.. ..aL...f tL..... S....a:..... 1O.nn.nen I l i . . . , . . , 18. . . • A~ A..:......1 ......J/.... I:......a....lC C3LVRi~ ..1.. . , 18.39.080 Location of business activity. A. All oifices and retail sales conducted in the Golden Peak ski base/recreation district shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building except for approved special events and food and beverage vending. (Ord. 21 (1986) § 2: Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39.090 Development plan required. ~ A. To ensure the unified development, the protection of the natural environment, the compatibility with the surrounding area and to assure that development in the Golden Peak ski base/recreation district will meet the intemt of the district, a development plan shall be required. B. The proposed development plan shall be in accordance with Section 18.39.110 and shall be submitted by the developer to the zoning administrator, who shall refer it to the Planning and Environmental Commission, which shall consider the plan at a regularly schedufed meeting. A report of the Planning and ' Environmental Commission stating its findings and recommendations shall be transmitted to the, town council for approval in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code. C. The approved development plan shall be used as the principal guide for aif development within the Golden Peak ski base/recreation district. D. Amendments to the approved development plan which do not-ehaft" substaflee alter the basic intent and character of 4he approved development plan may be approved by the zoning administrator or by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060. E. appfeved The development plan and any subsequent amendments thereto shall require the approval of the design review board in . 4 ~ d ~ • . accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 18.54 of the Municipal Code prior to the commencement of site preparation. • (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39.110 Development Plan - Contents , . • , sti ueture(s).- . , , . , , > > , such , , . fveee , areas. . , • ' , bieye'e , , , , . . , iivof , , , , otentoal . The followsn9 oaaformation arad materials sha91 be subrnct4ed witFu an application for a pu'oposed deve9opmen$ plan. Certain submittal requirernents sriay be waived or anodified by $he Darector of $he Departmerat of Cornrnunity Developrnent Bf Bt is dernonstra$ed that the materia6 to be w?aived or modified is not applicable to the review croteraa, or that other pract6cal solutions have been reachedo A. App9ecat6on form and fi9i~~ feeo 5 s ~ B. A written statement describing the project inctuding information on 4he nature of the devetopment proposed, proposed uses, and phasing plans. C. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing cond'ations of ~ the property to be included in the development plan, including the location of improvements, existing confours, natural features, existing vegetation, water courses, and perimeter property lines of the parcel. D. A titie report, including schedules A and B. E. Plans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations, etc.), if applicable. F. A complete zoning analysis of the existing and proposed developrnent including a square footage analysis of all proposed uses, parking spaces, etc. G. A site plan at a scale not smal6er than 1" = 20', showing the location and dimensions of all existing ansi proposed buitdings and structures, all principal site development features, vehicular ancV pedestrian circulation systems and proposed contours and drainage plans. H. Building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than 1/8" =1', in sufficient detail to determine floor area, circulation, location of uses and scale and appearance of the proposed development. 1. A vicinity plan showing existing and proposed improvements in relation to all adjacent properties at a scale not smaller than 1" = 50'. J. Photo overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for dernonstratirug the visual impac$ of the proposed deveiopment on pubiic and private property in the vicinity of the proposed development plan. K. An architectural or massing model at a scale sufficient to depict the proposed development in relationship to existing development on the site and on adjacent parcels. ~ L. A landscape p9an at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', showing existing landscape features to be retained and removed, proposed landscaping and other site development fea4ures such as recreation facilities, paths and trails, plazas, walkways and water features. M. An Environmental Bmpact Report in accordance with Chapter 18.56, unless waived by Section 18.56.030. N. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Director of the Community Development Departrnent. With the the exception of the rroodel, four cornplete copies of the above information shall be submitted at the time of the application. When a model is required, it sha81 be submitted a minimum of two weeks prior to the first formal review of the Planning and Environmental Commission. At the discretion of the Director of Community Development, reducedl copies in 8.5" x 11" format of all of the above information and additional copies for distribution to the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council may be required. 18.39.120 Besign Development Standard s/C rite ria for evaluation. , 6 • I Q a • ' r noise, adequate 'ight, aof, affif > B. , talt-mg > > , noise r wemen > > fFIiG[eiVf~~ . ' • f f , ' • f 1 F. • QGLIIaLy f eenvense 1 destofi 1 f . ' f Site f and f . 1 types, f ) • ~ ~ The fo9@owAng crater0a shal9 be aased as the principal means for eva9uating a proposed deve9opment p9an. @t shall be the burden of the appiicant 4o demonstrate tha$ 4he proposed deveBopment poan complies with all applicable design criteria. 9 e Bua9ding desegn weth respect to architecture, character, scale, rnassing and orieautatoon us cornpatible w6th the site, adjacent properties and the surround6rag neighborhoode ao BuiBdings, omprovements, uses and activities are designed and BoGated 40 prodaace a functiona6 development plan responsive to the site, the surrouneBing ne6ghborhood and uses, ancl4he coenmuni4y as awhole. 3. Open space and 9andscap6ng are both functiona9 and aesthetic, are des6gned to preserve and enhance the natural features of the s6te, enaximaze opportunities for access ancl use by the public, and when possable, are . untegrated with existing open space and recreation areaso 44. A pedes$rian and vehicu9ar carcuBation system designed to provide safe, effacient and aesthe$ica86y pleasing carcu6ation to the site and throughout the sBeve9opmen$e 5. Env6ronmenta0 impacts resu9towg from the proposa8 have been identified on the project's Environrnen4a0 6rnpact Report, af not waived, and all necessary mitigat~~g measures are imp9ernented as a part o$ the proposed deve6oprraerat p9an0 6. Compluance wu4h The VaaB Lared Use PBan and other app9acab9e p8ans. 7 Y d ` i 18.39.130 Lot area. The minimum (ot or site area shall be forty acres of site area, at least one acre of which ~ shall be buildable area. (Ord 83 (1983) §1.) 18.39.150 Setbacks. In the Golden Peak ski base/recreation district, front, side, rear and stream setbacks shall be as indicated on the approved development plan. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39.170 Height. , . up-to . , , . , , eupoles, ehaFnneys, , and fi##een-tee~ Building height shall be as shown on the final roof plan as included in 4he approved development plan. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) , 18.39.180 Density Control. Total density shall not exceed one dwelling unit per eight acres of site area. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39.190 Site coverage. Site coverage shall be as shown on the approved development plan. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) . 18.39.210 Landscaping and site development. Landscaping requirements shall be as shown on the approved development plan. All areas within the area(s) of disturbance in the landscape plan not occupied by building, ground level decks or patios, or parking shall be landscaped. (Ord. 38 (1983) § 1.) 18.39.230 Parking Plan and Program Parking Plan and Management Program shall be as shown on and descrit'ed in the approved development plan. heveryoneyi m\skibase.wpd . 8 • ATTACFiMEPBT 2 • A summary of the TDA and RRC reports TDA Analysis - Existing conditions base data was compiled by severai methods. Automatic , traffic count recorders were placed along Vail Valley Drive from UVednesday, December 28th through Friday, the 30th, Christmas week, 1994. Manual counts and video observations were recorded on Friday, the 30th during the morning (8:15-10:15am) and afternoon (3:15-5:00pm). All vehicular and pedestrian movements to and from the Golden Peak Base Facifity were recorded during these peak periods. On Saturday, January 21, 1995 and Saturday, April 1, 1995 data was recorded in order to observe traffic conditions during a typical DEVO Saturday. - The skier day count on Friday, December 30th was 14,700 skiers. The 1,200 space main Vail Village parking structure filled at 11:45am, vuith 2,855 vehicles parked throughout the day. Over 980 students were in ski school lessons and the base restaurant processed 1,150 transactions throughout the day. On January 21 st, the skier day count was 14,620 skiers. Vail parking structure also filled on this day at 10:30am, with 2,422 vehicles throughout the day. - Daily traffic volume on Vail Valley Drive was over 8,000 vehicles per day at East Meadow Drive, reducing to 1/4 of this, 2,030 vehicles per day east of Golden Peak. From 8:45-9:45am on Vail Valley Drive across from the parking area, was • 220 eastbound and 215 westbound vehicles. This is equivalent to about 7% of the daily volume of 6,125 vehicles at this location. The PM peak hour volume was 210 eastbound and 325 westbound, representing approximately 9% of daily traffic. - During the December count, 14 vehicles were observed entering Mill Creek Circle to drop skiers off in the AM peak hour. TDA estimates that approximately 30 skiers were dropped off from those vehicles. During the PM peak hour, 30 vehicles were observed entering Mill Creek Circle to pick up skiers at this location. - Directional distribution shows strong directional orientation of Golden Peak vehicle trips to and from the west (Vail Village, 1-70 interchange and beyond). About 80% of the vehicles came from and returned to the west. Virtually all trips to the site were destination rather than passerby trips, meaning motorists returned to the same direction they approached from. - The following explains the mode of arrival to the Golden Peak base for the 1,500 peak hour. Pedestrians were the greatest single mode of arrival at 34% of the peak hour persons. Seven percent of arrivals were Children's Center drop-offs and one-fifth of all arrivals came via the In-Town Shuttle. The Golden Peak parking lot uvas the source of 15% of the AM arrivals. Twenty percent of arrivals are skier drop-offs. This activity generates the highest number of vehicle trips, 44% of all vehicles arriving in the AM peak hour. The Town shuttle is responsible for an equal number of arrivals, 300 persons, yet it represents just 3% of all vehicle trips. ~l - The parking lot, skier drop-off area and Children's Center are the major vehicle destinations at Golden Peak. Vehicles approaching from the west show the parking lot was the biggest destination, attracting 42% of all vehicle trips. The • Children's Center and public drop-off were equal attractors at 29% each. On Saturday, a larger percentage of vehicles are destined for the parking lot due to DEVO drop off occurring there. - Currently, the public parking area consists of a 130 space lot on the south side of Vail Valley Drive. Approximately 10-12 spaces are reserved for employees, 10 spaces are reserved for Spraddle Creek residents and nearby condominium development and four spaces are reserved for people with disabilities. - The Golden Peak parking lot is used as a skie'r drop off point, as well as for all day paid parking. On Saturdays, the west portion of the parking lot is reserved until 9:30 AM for parents of children in the DEVO program to drop their children off. Because of the large volume of DEVO vehicles arriving at one time vehicles trying to get into the parking area for drop-off s#ill often back up on to Vail Valley Drive. - The public skier drop off area is located between the Golden Peak lodge and the Children's Center. There is currently space to accommodate a maximum of 10 vehicles off-street for this activity. At this level of use, vehicles must wait for the - ones in front to exit before they can exit the turnaround. Ai any one time there were between three and five vehicles stopped along Vail Valley Drive during peak periods. - Dwell time is the average length of stay per vehicle in the drop off/pick up ~ turnaround. Posted signs limit vehicles using this area to a 5 minute dwell time. Dwell time in the AM peak hour averaged 3.3 minutes per vehicle. In the afternoon, this duration increased over 75% to 5.9 minutes per vehicle. Nearly 40% of the vehicles using the turnaround in the PM peak hour stayed over five minutes, and 15% stayed over 10 minutes. - Day care and children's ski school activities take place at the Children's Center. Currently, there are 21 head-in spaces in the parking lot serving the Children's Center. It is signed "Children's Skiing Center Drop-Off Parking Only." The average stay for vehicles enter the parking lot was 12 to 15 minutes. Two vehicles remained parked in the lot all day during the 12/30/95 observations. In the AM peak hour, December count, 70 vehicles entered the Children's Center parking lot. From observation, approximately 100 people were dropped off at this time. This accounts for 25% of the total people dropped off at Golden Peak. - Over a third of the peak hour arrivals, 510 persons during the December count, were pedestrians. The following information represents the relative use of the six distinct pedestrian paths used by skiers walking into the Golden Peak area. The path from the west (Vail Village core) was the most utilized by arriving pedestrians, just under one-third at 31%. Walk-ins from the south side of Manor Vail was next highest at 19%, followed by those coming up Chalet Drive, 16%. About 13% of the pedestrians come along Vail Valtey Drive north of Golden Peak ' ~ and 7% from the east afong Vail Valley Drive. The Ford Park Path, intermingled with Manor Vail guests, accounted for 14% of the walk-ins. ~ - Tvuo Vail transit routes serve Golden Peak: the In-Town Shuttle and the Golf Course route. The In-Town Shuttle runs every 7-10 minutes connecting Golden Peak to Lionshead Village via the Transportation Center. The Golden Peak bus turnaround is the east terminus of the route. During the December AM peak hour 300 people (20% of all arrivals in the peak hour) arrived at Golden Peak via this , shuttle. In January, 110 people arrived during this time. In April, 150 people arrived to Golden Peak via this route in the AM peak hour. - The Golf Course route runs every 30 minutes cannecting the Golf Course to Golden peak and the Transportation Center. In December, 30 people arrived at Golden Peak via this route in the AM peak hour. Traffic study recommendations: - Redevelopment of the Golden Peak Base Facility should consider mitigation of several capacity and safety deficiencies. - The Children's Center could use an additional 12-15 off-street spaces to augment the exist+ng 21 short term spaces. - The drop-off lane has a demonstrated need for about 25 to 28 off-street stalls. - This should be separated from the private vehicle drop-off area to reduce pedestrian/vehicle coriflicts, thereby increasing safety and efficiency. The bus • boarding area should be wide enough to allow buses to pass each other, approximately 22 feet. - The existing inbound bus stop for the Golf Course route drops skiers at a precarious location, just west of the sharp curve in Vail Valley Drive. If this stop could be incorporated in the future shuttle turn around, this safety problem could be eliminated. - Golden Peak pedestrians using Ford Park Trail cross or walk along Vail Valley Drive where the road curves sharply. Future redevelopment should consider a formal crosswalk to the trail that leads conveniently through the new facility. - Since over 80% of the vehicles arriving at the Golden Peak base come from and return to the west, it is important to minimize their penetration into the Golden Peak activity area. Access to and from the parking structure and private vehicle . drop-off should be along the west portion of, the Golden Peak site. - An operation plan, combined with adequate site design, will be needed to. safely accommodate the anticipated increase in Golden Peak Base activity. RRC Survev - Among the overatl sample, about 7 percent used Lift 6 as their first lift of the day, ~ with 40 percent using the Village and 48 percent using Lionshead. Locals and - Front Range day visitors were more likely to use Lift 6(9 percent and 12 percent, respectively) than were destination visitors (about 6 percent). - Overall, about one third of the respondents walked to the mountain "today," 43 percent drove, 13 percent used the In-l'own shuttle, 6 percent used lodging/van services, and 5 percent used the outlying bus. Overnight destination skiers were more likely than average to walk, with day skiers and locals more likely to have driven. - Thirty-two percent feel that Lift 6 is the most important of the remaining out-of- valley lifts to be replaced. In comparison, 41 percent would prefer Lift 1(Vail Village), and 22 percent would prefer the gondola out of Lionshead to be replaced. - Currently, 46 percent indicate they do not use Lift 6 at all. If it was replaced, only 11 percent would not use it at all. - Locals, Front Range day, and Colorado overnight guests would be most likely to use Lift 6"most" or "all of the time." - It is evident that a substantial increase in utilization would occur, particularly among those visitor segments who already have an inclination to use the lift or to prefer the eastern portion of the mountain. - It is conceivable that demand for usage, specifically for Lift 6, to access the ~ upper mountain and China Bowl areas referred to above (as well as the use of Lift 6 as a"skiing " lift) could increase the usage of Lift 6 as an out-of-valley lift from current levels, to range of 20 to 28 percent of the visitors and locals on any given day. - Currently, many visitors complain about the length of time it takes to migrate across the mountain and to and from the Two EIWChina Bowl area from the Lionshead or Vail Village portals. This issue will clearly be mitigated by the opportunities afforded by the upgraded Golden peak base area. However, this increased demand for the use of Lift 6 would be balanced by realistic access and skier processing/lift capacity limitations at Golden peak, which would make it highly unlikely that the estimated demand would be exceeded. Also, countering the projected increased demand for Lift 6 is the situation that skier loads and levels of congestion at the Vail Village and Lionshead pods will be reduced by the incremental shift to Golden Peak. This will create a continuing draw to the Vista Bahn and Lionshead and will help to maintain a reasonable balance between the three primary portals to Vail nllountain. . - It should.also be noted that the current use of the Golden Peak portal includes many ski school students and nursery children (and their parents who drop them off) who do NOT use Lift 6. The portal is also used by Vail Associates employees, currently numbering about 500. In light of the decision to expand the Children's ~ e , d Ski Center at Lionshead, it is not anticipated that either ski school students or the number of VA employees based at Golden Peak will expand significantly. ~ Given the variety of uses at the Golden Peak area, while demand for Lift 6 might be tripled over the current (rather low) levels, total access to the pod might only be expected to increase by about half that amount, due to the anticipated relatively constant level of use and lack of future growth in demand by both the Golden Peak Children's Center and by Vail Associates' employees based at that _ location. - Indications are that most of the shift access to Galden peak would be absorbed by increased use of the shuttle bus. Such usage would increase dramatically based on the survey data (48 percent would use the shuttle bus to access the Golden Peak area). This would place some increased demand not only on the Tovun bus system, but also on the passenger loading and unloading areas at Golden Peak as vuell. Currently, many skier passengers who unload from the bus at Bridge Street will continue instead to ride the bus to the Golden Peak stop. A certain proportion of this increased tn-Town bus demand for Golden Peak can be absorbed within the existing capacity of the system. - This analysis is based upon responses to a more comprehensive capital facilities survey, completed by a random sample of skiers interviewed at all of the various on-mountain restaurants at Vail. . ~ ' ILItb`'~`.. : • ~~Ac . REDEVELOPMENT ' - - - - - - - ~ TOCiW OF vAf1 Slt&,'yTTAL PAQtACE i U~dolo I Li SITE PLARf ~ \ - - - - - - - . . v„o,.,a wr. vAa AsacaaTEs ; Pove oa er oESMWoRcsW)r \ \ f~.oc~cr G. N94 . , ~ - a..e n m m 03W ~ . UCOID PAVENeif AE PER TOV 47FAN75GCit tAASTffi RMl ICONCIMiF UMf DAV@M • ~ ASPIYlLT PAiH ~ ~COL0.2M CON@ETE PAVFM81f ~ COIOM CCTCCQE7E PAV@STOKPS 00 ' , _ \ r y~~\ \ , _ ! , - - - _ _ - . , ~ ~ q , , , I 1\ ~ _ ~ i ~ M.n~°.ALX, ~ o URM % ( 1 \ \ \ ~vw6~su A ~NU~txc.w~n~ ??~1~ ,M BASE FACILITY ' - REDEVELOPMENT TOWN OF VAL AJBMfTTAL PAOUCE L2 SITE CRADINC PLAN ~ ?..w.d F«: vw assow,Fs CHILDRENS SKI , _ ?..w.~ ew oESMwbernar ~ SCHOOL BIDC ~ - w..r.. o. M" \ \ F117 UFT I 12 / NOTE tEM' LOAD BEVATION OF QiA! Q 6 LII! _ _ ~~--~1 ~ F ~ I ~ ~ ~ . i s4a~s ~ I COIDEN PEAK - ~ - _ , ~ \ ~ ~ ~c.... BASE FACILITY - -o,a - - ' - - ~ ~ ~ . I PROPOSED CARACE ,.,4NOR VAIL I ' "H I , \ I ~ \ ~ • \ , • i \ ` _ ~ ~ \ . ' ~ . G ~ - \ ~ r~ / C~& VAIL VqLLEY DRIVE \ G ~ ~ • ~ ri,.1t~ ~ ' V • 1~~ ~/'9~LIILIII Ild ~EDEVEU..OPIF7NENT I - Y010.qtl QF dALi SUMTTqL PAQCACE I Updalo J L3 PLANTINC PLA~1 I amva+oe F~. vaa Assoaans vope•aa an cISONmoaYS+cOP I rcovEaM o. em - - ~ ZIU12F 7 - ~ U2F , ~ - Z ~ .,7 Q~ .`..e.....~,._.~.. 0 on.. ~m „ u Dows . I- M02 M peyseC f'Oee bwp dyey~ ~I~w~ e MJnin \ ~ ~ uMi bw i w ZT-~ . " s e.yo;... . w~e e.a~ a 1~ ~ •r rcr. ~ a.N~~ew a~ae~w. i e. ~ ~ i i w~•^~v~m.e \ 1 J / TFM M rOYAlE r I~ ~ ! FLANTM s~ sW I - , - ~ - n ~ PAVED stOFacES / C., - - - i' ` 1~~, J ~cam 'Aar,~° j l*MF - - - - - ~ . _ ~ rr ° / -1 rt~c ' l COLDEN PEAK ~ BASE FACILITY REDEVELOPMENT PACKACE p l4 SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN_ ~ I. . P~+pr~d Fon VAl ASSOdATEt ?'"ar oE"wamcaa? ~ . ~ oclobe 27. Ms +m. ~ w ~ • LECEND Ordto snew Nwap vwe ' \ . Amr te M dored uW Mwed un-Nte ArMs b N dsvad end raeaved ol}-tlv -ap Tooperwy ~ 1 ¦ orridwee,oR dd~? To Ae n Ynow MII aremo ~ . ~ \ . 1 . . . ~ . . , , i , ~ . . • . . i ~i' A (C IL O~~ ~~DEqELOPMENT , IZZ YOCYPf OF tlA(L SfWS" PTAL PAtttACE i UpdnM acum L5 FIRE APID EPAS PLARf ais w2 eas aoCM aeEa LEFt OuF r~ ~WOOMW ~ P-wCF9LDREMS SIU e vaa assaa~~ Sf]iOQL BLDC o. fm s I tffr CuF ang LIFT °0'° 1. t~ e - 0,~~ e. «.m~aaa .o, r~v I ~ - _ _ ~ ~ - _ _ _ C.~~T b metl a? M imCa. d 70 Wl M e rnY~nu~~i M1~1 b Ib ~ Wvaea ~ livn pe:a b tb m4 M!e bp cfi- d T, ep e'~w~aw IsyM ebvve d J'J" ryan pa0e b W . I~f eEetlw~P4 ~ ~ . ~ M IYO ba c'~ tlKJ Ge 0~ b U~v ~aaL. 1 `.R m1EiB0.m aoO{!= I ~ ~ ~TO ntCFtf Tlstot101 1 EplTl9E [qR R30P07F 1C07) ~ ? ~ - _ p .O . ~ 0 ' ` r \ ~ ~ ~ ~sa 1 I GOLDBd PEAK F 1 BASE FApUTY j a+ie.Oa+c waTER-N roa+T ~ rM oartuod Para RM oE". COPSECTKM ~ ,'•,F~E ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ F E \ + / \ ' \ •AANOR VAIL I~ ~ ~_-~-~-~y p ~-=~4~# ' \ `-FOM LANE ' - ' fME LAFff AWACE ~ . CHALET ~440A0 ~ axe La~ rwnce ~ r~ xrasta?+T / ` - - ~ ' i ~t, . i ' VAII VALLEY DRIVE . . , _ . ; ~ ~ . IY00YD fM I~D COLDEN PEAK BASE FACIUTY REDEVELOPMENT TOWN Of VAL ft,6M1TTAL IAqCACE ~ L6 PARCEL PLAN ~ eMr~d Fx: VAL ASSOGATES LFT QUE MAZE h CNILDRENS SKI I ~ M".r.4 Br• oESio+woecs140p SCHOOL BI.DG octb.. 23, ina _ - . ~ , LOT 17 - ~ LIFT WE MAZE LIFT ~ ~ ~ rRACT 12 ~ BARY PARI,kL yON J ~ ` : t wo 1944 eLjLDjNC _ ~ ~vE 1 tOPE BASE FACIL TY 1~ \ IJ 3 ~ , , ? LOT lf , , NANOR. Vnll f 4 ' ~ ~ -1 ~ I ; ; ~I r u ~ ~ \ ~ (b • , _ ~ \ , : ~ , ~ ~ w~ c Ilnl E I 'Ik~1I' L • ` ` \ EXKIING ROW ~ - ~ - - ~ - ~ ' ~ . - . _ _ . ' - - - - , Ire, VAIL VALLEY DRI VE ` - M?~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ; - - ~ ~ • ~ ~ - . Um RJMNM oa~~oo o ~ ~ . a~ma~ao / ~ q > ~ CiPI Cva. ~-u C"r..:3 Q~vAr 4~ qTm.. G N1 - ~ v ~?~y ~ C(kr qu'fy+*.a G'~ We~+nU~ p S 1`-'- ' / MMLL W S:JYO p - wm em~s cux~vo.r~av oewme~ yU ~ . . ~S] ~~n w o C~w.. rcv c+c " ~ ' ~ ~ ~q~ ~p ~ ~TIW - F~. ~ WMr4 1JFLLL ~p. CQIOOP~In~~JM ~ .Nil ~ RAIL ~ ~ ~ -0-'ftav • La~lc~e~ Owls w,t-L. , ie - r•s ~.a..,,... Q,r . ~ (g a ~ a.e,..;~ t ~ Ncr ~ y ~reMi f 'L ~ ~61L WJOY LmlJ ~ (ry~r~ Ti ~ ~ . ~ . --4 ~ r' ~ ' D, ~ . " Llf;~t... •w~ I I ~.~i~ r~ - - Fs. ~ ~ i. ? _ I ILvyPS 1 M Yoem.v I ! y JI ~y , ¢ .i• i: q, + _ ~ v.ams c..ae.e~ ~ ~A-~~ : eo&. T. 7~\ 4'ar~. !~e 6 t'.~. ~ . S °""'~'en .1La ~ 1,(I : I.. ~ ~ - . ~Y"~1Atlr 160`/I'~A ` \ -QGnLC y;.n.` DEIIELO~QY , _~i mtIMBTTAL /~p~~ne~ - va: ~.oa.~¢f ~d°t1~.++eq' ~ eLSrra?~o+r a•f'm1- 6,Jn~ uls1L Lv, ~•eva~ ~ MiF ORAu ~ ~FT J7 ~ L12 ~ • v -sa _ _ _ °~.C38CD W2~ i9"{~'N LMOR9Yf AMOWI@C111 lM0 RAIIMC IMM/Ol1101 \ d cv,.~ ~.w~ S~.`Y;• Td~ RNNC r~_.a-•~.~w'-'~°~ J.:o.w.~•..~ .,..ti~`.n"' '(T ~"°mxcro. ° ~~~m • y.+.w ti ~ ' .ncn c. s~? , fy _ r s-~c•ow_- ~'~~,tp~` i)~f+l,•.__ _ ~e--. r+ s+ , • ?.e~ aux N .-.c m.o~ ~ `'',F,t' ~ • „ ~ ; Ma• ~ _ a?~~~u. . a.•.~wr..r.~+.s-.~~ - _ 'F--.~.~a~~...,. „ A Kn/[ y . ~~ay~ya~~ • . M - 1n01SfMQM//IiD ] ro~etww0 _ ' _ _ / ` . • ~ r.~ao.a~.~.vra ~ - ' - ' - - ' - - - - - p.j SHRCO Pa , -r - ~ - - .mm...u CC- p . 1 - ~~a? o~ sHRCD 1\C :ROCNDCO\"Eii PLANTI~G DET.1:I. O 1QFARONMIGM , U 0 • • MYmR W ` . - nef~oeMF - r, i - w,^ • O' • ~I srM¢ III.I~I .a,ervr r..ww W :4 _ - aW, U; .9 ~O ~ ' . ~ ' ]Ittv[wCO003Y)O~ `-L~'• - X'Y} •+R'_.Y ' . J4p.n.r er~~ xe e++~+e; a • / Z 1 ~ y,A ~ ~cra.o ~~r `~~~~..u•~a ~ ~'•~'.o' . . ,r. 1r r~"'~'^+!' 9..,.,.,e . w~e. o~. ' _ = - +~v~. r~ ~ . ~a.c-s'~.x - i I ~ ~ ~ - , _ , ? I~I~ ~ IK M1)•.rr+~Or. ~ - . ~ .c~ • • ~ H I . //I ti i/ . . . w.r ~ `rw M~rrsn ~ I i ~ YGCiC9O ~ '~LR ryE15L Y _ yq~,-JM!HK,_ ~ 1 i ~SYT'~5~1G• _ _ r~vr.O.~Ir i~Yl ' ~ ~r~~ ~M n Y~•Q~~•~~f • , r SUWN"AL Wn OCTAL$ >il~LTi-7F:l~KF.D-THEE >T4KINf. DF.TNL A..u nP"!w~ BCl1'is! ~'e 4 R6r'~,SD ~9ai~•.J ~ L13 • ~ ~ ~ - • n j ml)t _ ~ _ aa°r~0 O ~~R~y~\ ~ • ~ µsbuctme ~co' '*~•e • O ~ pr? ~.a~'a~ \ ~ ~~y •c~" ' ~ ~ \ c'J,; ,r/ • . ~ Q s' / ' p ts ~ , &I~ w Go1dm Fkat ~ Fad Pa'h . , ~ ~ .1 ~ Maor Vail ~.•-r-- ~ ~ ~ ~~l ~ o /j/~ ~ ~mk~„g • P ~y7„ ~r~' _ fC~ . Veil Vi~~ge\~ ~ * w+' • ° ' ` ~si }L d.egend I'nmarv Pedntrian AatB tC-E ER] Secondary PedestrianAmss ~ cAiae, rnk ssee ~-'yr _ ~ - ~ `J - . -i~i / ^ f-~~-_ ~ 1/O • tQ.JO~ µ~p•l~;.i. _ ~ ~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~`'~L_ .J ~ • ~ `etf i ~ ~ . ? 7, , %f-='~- i i j '•.i% ' S~ ~ ` ~ i i / / GOIdeI& ~~ak . Redevelopment Prdcstrinn Connections and Context Plan . ( a ia isa m a ~ N ~ r Pi' rce, Se6 bfrg k i 1 T I T 7 ~ Y ~ nee ie~es ~ I rt ~ Arc6ltecla I I I I ~I I I I I I I a ' - ' - ~ _ ~ - - --i7 f ~ ` I I ~ kl j ~ ~ ~ ~ q I I ~ nu, - - ~ o~~ Nl~~ • - - I \ .a g ~ - ¢ I I ° I I cL < > md Q- - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - ~ x ~ ~ . N Q- - - - - - - ~ - E ~ ~In~~ I ' I t°• ~ ~ o ~ > ~ ~ - - - - - ~ ¢ - - -~--I- b I i ~ I cw~ I I I R ~ I I _ I I o- - I I - 4-- ~ - -~I - I - I - I I J~ I I I I _'__I~ •i I I__ > ~e.eT O ! ~ ~ I I 0~l. ~J~~ll 4D Cd~ J ~IR~CIaLIaJ I I . vvT I I I ~ ~ o- - - ~ - - - ~ - - - . , i ~ - - ~ ~ - _ e• ~ o=~~`~"' FLOOR PLAN-LF.VEL I94 - ~~!i7T.-~_~_.----- ~ ~ ~ a - I___- • ~ • . f t ~~lef ~ C; C~ C~~ ~ c~ c, ~z, ~9, n SeRerberRh ; I I I 'I 'I~ ~ hexncielrx •_I ~ I I ~ Ar Pchit«t9 i ~ r.~•~ ~~~w ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~I Cr- - - - - - - - ~ - -L-----~ - - -n ' I ~ o m o ~ m m m -;i------~~-:-:-_~-- --J-~ i - - - ~ ~ , ct - ; - - - - - - - ~ - ;h; ;i i ' i i i i i i ? i e ' I~~ i IW I I o ~ ~ I ~ I I I I I j F o ~ -~1-~ - - IF-=-==>-=- I~. f~-- - - - _ ~----~~--cr_ u > v ° ~ ~ I I I; ;I I I j- j d . o- ~ - - ~~-~---fi- - ~ - ~ ~--Q Z , cm ~ I I ~ a' ~ • ~ Q~' i - - - - - - - - ~ - - -I - - - -'-E~ - - e Ca Q i i j- - -0 -.7 co cmi ~ I i i Q i ~7 > o- - - - - = - - - - - - ; i° i o ~am am 0 o- - ' - - - - - ~ - - - - - --j -1- - .o_--- i--- - o- - - - - - -o 0 0 - m I I I I I I I ~ j I a j ~ ~ - - ~ ~ Ii I \ . I , , I I I I I -'-'=-4. _ ~ ~ I - !-l - - - ~ i- . ~ - - - i - . - - i i ~ a,~; FLOOR PLAN-LEVEL 207 r r - - tiee~rin eeH O O ~ Q O Q Q ~ ~ " A,o ~ A,ti,te ~ F.C.-~.I.1. e,~ • :e. . l. I I I .I i I. ~~.e• o.o~ o.o• ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I II ~I : : - ~ , I I L -1 _ ? w...._ CJ - - _ - - - I - - - - - - a~ - - I I - ~t- <A~ : . „ ~ oa. o• on ~ on o 71 . ti.~. - ~ t ~ - ~ , ~ . G - 4 , , , . . . y ~ I~ ~ ~ ,'e- ' _ . -i ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ UNIT •4 ~ ~ • I - l I ~ I I I ' ~ - - . ~ ~ ~ - - - - ° ~~;-----------=~I j c~ Q V uNir 3 II II I I I ~ ' ~T- ~ - - - - ~ - - ~ b~ e l ,~,ro, ~ ~ UNiT - a--------I -------1 ~ --i i ~ Ll w J IT UNIT '2 ° I I I ~ I ~ 'I II f ~NIT _ I . ~I _'i'_' - I I Ll Q - - - , . ~ . ~ ~ N . . ~ I ' ~ - u irl "i oA ~ o - - - - - - - - - - - ~ y- = ~ . - . i i - ~ . . - L~l - - - - - - - " - - . . - - ~ ----r`__ - . • ~ I 1 I fo._ _ , ..e ,...w.. ..e• ..e• ..e. .:e. - - ...e ~e.~ - - - - - - - _ . i~ FI.OOR YLAN-LGVEI. 219 ~ i 0" , o: 3 A2.3 •o+^, :c~rorrucJ ..r ~ ~ ~ • a . n Pierce, ~ V ~ ~ Q Q Q Q Q im it SAaeoc sleeh ~ ~ ArchilecL~ P.f: A.I.~. I •~y r.~• n~.~~ ~~.r r.~v.• i~~. • snm o.o• v-~ w~ima I I I I I I I I I ~ ~u`t.~r. v o O ~ - - _ - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - a _ - - - _ ~ _a..._ 4 ' J I I ;~I ~ f ~ _ ~ - - - - - -j~, I _ : - - . " I I • _ I ~ ~ _ ~I;~,__;~) ~ ~ i# f r 7 ~ - - - - - - ~ _ - - - - - - - - - --1 u!,ur,•4--- .-~I~ ~ ~ s ~i,- -----II - - - l~~ c:~ ~ PUNIT -3 ~ • a ~ - - - - uNi 12 _ - ---I- • n. vi Q --r='=-=--- _ - - - UNir - - - - : 4-4-~~EI Q N I__ ~ - - _ UNIT •6 ' I Q - - r=-=-=~ - - - - ~ - ~ _ _ _ ~ z " I . i I I - - - J - ' c - {h~.;- ~r - - T= - - - - - - - - ~ - - t-- - r;, fi- - = j- ~ ' . e.e s ~ l3+IN ~ i.Y.J µi W4~v uru e w>uu ~ rL.ooR P~,nrv-Lrvei, -{o~a; - ~ A.'.;l , r - - I Y I I) QC+) I~ (I;) ticgerberg rs h Aneocia l ArcLilrcls P.C.-A.1.1. I I I I ~ I I I ..L' I I I I dn~ I I I I I I I I I I I I o-- - - - -1--- -I- - - - = - - -L - - - ~m~ o ~R . , . ' ~ ~ I I ~ o-~-¦; ~~I ~j I I ~ , ~ o- - - - - - - .o . , . \ : • p~ ~ ~ Y o-~ - - - - - II-----1I - - - - - - - ~ - - --i- --~-i - - J~ ~ ; ~ i i i _ i I; .;I- _ i ~ - ~ i ° ~ z , - Zi r ° _ " _ _ • ~ -E.--- _ . . ~ ~ , ~ ~ - - - - - - - ~ _ - - - - ~ T - - - J - - ~ , .o o-~ - - - _ - - - - - - - - J~l r - - _ - - ~ - -{----j---LJ ~ - Q- ~ - _ _ _ ~ ,'~F~ o- - - - ~~i R0~ - - - _ r- I I I I I I I I I I I , , o, , ~ 01' PLAN ~ j ~ o ~L .o.~. ~ ~[iroPrucr i ~ . • a ~ . . 0 1 e) . • tr V ( (i~ ~y ~ n 9a~erbr arfeo msoel G ~ eo ~ ArctdtocU " 4~ vc-us ------------i---------i----- B ,~d = - - - ' - _ - - - ~ i 4 -----i---- ~ i - - . , U u . I I ~ • . - ~ > , i i - - - - ~ Q _ Tl _ -a_ ~ ~ o ~ i - . -r- i - - - - ; i „ , ~ • , ~ ~ s _ _ - ~ - - - ~ t ~ - j - - - - - ~ I ~ ~ ' w I F , • i - - I I - - ~ ~ --F- --r- - 0 ~ ~ ~ - --1- I - - = ' I --h~ - - - - I ~ a j ~ • - - ; ~ ~ . I o- i ; ~ _ - - _ ~ 'I Oi` . . ~ ~ ~ ~m~~• . . i ' I I~ e-+-(~ I I . ' ' . I o.wa r¦ . . ~ w.e~ a~ i \ PARKING GARAG@ PLAN-IEVE6 163 ~ ~ b•..Q ~ A3.1 - - I ir Se~er~cr e6h Aaeocisl Y 7 A.~nii«U d I I I I I I I I an~ ~ I I I I I I I I s= ` ~ I I I I I I I I B --t~- I I~ --~--•i,--- I , - - - - ti.` - - ! ~ I I I I\ I I ° . - - - w-n - - - - - , - I~ - ~ - - - , --A~ o I I I I I I H ~ I I I I I , a o ~ I I I I I I ~ < Q I I I , ~I I , ~ - ~ . ~ ~ I - - r~i ¢ I I I I I I ~ ti ~ - - -~1--- - -°-f:------- ~ -f p., ~ I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ - --a-- - - - - - - - - ~l w o + I I I I I ~ ~ q 6 I i ~ I I I I I I ---l--~ -J ----{a~ --l L _I ! I I I I I I I a N - - - - I J I~ ~ w~ + I I I I I I i ~ I I I I I I I a fi-~-- - - - - - - - + ~ ~ ~ 1 0, a K _I-'__-'~._ • . . --•--~Y L..~ _ _ , O..m Il I[c I I I I - i - --L - - - PARKING GARAGE PLAN-LEVEL 194 ~ . ~o•.Y !)mnsxur L • ~ ° .i. I . . . _ _ . . Pier Segerber6 k ABCOCWP6 Archltects 10 ~ 17 13 ~y ( I I I I I ` PRI ~ I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I 1 I I 0 ~ - - - ~ - ~ - - - - - - - T ~ - F-- - - - - - - - - - - -----=~=~a-~ - - ~ - - - .~da.,.. - - - - = W - , --y - - - ~.~..,.~..y . . ~ - _ ~ ~ ~I w G F=-=~~ - -~:~m ~ -=F-- ~ z 6 ~ ~ PARKING CARAGE NORTH ELEVATION W~°n 1A3.3j o Q a O J ( ~ > i I I i - I ~I~eu . o ? - - y~~ o00o m; m. ? ~ ID - FMI - - - - - - - ~ - - - --n-----1--,----- fi,- - - r ~ T~ - - - - - _ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ L - ~ ~i-~ ~Kn~:.`.^0 a~~a•~n_!~ ` z PARKING GARAGE WEST ELEVATION ^ 7 ) ~ i ~ ,C33 ~A m I r. 1. 1.• 1 I~ ~ _ _ w.R.. Se~~t Aftwtod, • ?c.-ua ~ (3) ' ~ r I I I I I I tr ; I i------ i _r_. - - I - -----i I ------r ;I i: - - i - I i _ ~ ' ~ - ~ - - ~ - - i - _ ~ _ ;,,~~a ~ s I I I I I 1 ~ ~ ~ . . : . . ~ . _ , ~s > ' - - - - - - - W II II~ ~I I ~ • : - - , I ~ - . ip ~ ~ , Tp r~ t ii. Ng_01"""~' z _L ~ LONG[TUD[NAL PARKING CARAGE HUILDING SBCTION W yt A3.4 0 ~ _ - - - - - - - - - - . ,~„a~..~? vi V I ~ I~ . i i~ . . . . ~ . _ _ . . . - ~ - . ' ~ _ . _ I~ ~ • • T -a- - - ~ . - - - - ~ C :1 ~ ' . ~.a.rc.,..• i I- I- 1' r_._>ww wr ~~~~a . 7'RANSVERSE PARKING GARAGE BU[LDING SECTION ~w.I~' _ _ _ _ ~ (LaM y f.¦ r~ 1 Y 1 ~ " A3.4 I'ierer, Se6erAer6 k , Ase cialea Archilecls . . w, . i:..~~~ • i i «w~ i i`~ ,..~~o, ' i i ~ I= a ' - I ~ac ~~J ( - - ~ ~ . aa ! oI ! o~ o ¢ ° - - • ° , Q [r" > - - - ~ . _ ~ $ - u.n~e,-. ~ _ _ - L----- ~ 0 . .M.. - ~ . z 6 U NOR'fll [;LP,VATION W ° J < A4.1 • ~m Q N Q o oQ ~ ~ im Q I Q~.~+mA. I L ~I I I I I I I - I , .,....~.o • , - - - - - - = - - - _ - ' - . - - - : ~ - - ~ . , - - - o ~ . , I mm ~ - - - - - - - - - - I I I I w I ili i i------------ L------------ 1------------ ~-----------i ri L------------ 1---------------- J-- I _J ; ~ / ? ~SOUTH FLEVATION i. A.1. I i: - Se6erberg k Aeeocisles ArchitecLs I I ~rtv I I I I I I I w~n`.Y r1 w. I I I l I I I I - I I I I ,I ~ - - I ~ ' ~r~ I I I -~I - - - - - - - _ If , - 71 o'~- , - o --.-j :o-,-. - - ' a . ' o FE-1~ - - - - - ~.x.~,:~r I I I > I I I I I I~ I I ~ n _l - -f- J-------~-- - - - =o~. ~ •s x ~ Z i EAST ELEVA]ON W ~a.2 m l1. vi 7 u • Gz] o _ Q N ti t < ~ - I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I I f I - - - - - - - . ~ - I I I I°M 0M!0 \ I w = - - , • . , oo , - - - , ' - + - - - - - - oi0 B - ~ - i - - - - - A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - -t ------~-----t-----;-------~------t------t-- -=i ~ .,.,.,..r ~,.w.,,.~~... ~ I f CeKk.dJLT . .~.tl.l ~ z WEST ELEVATfON, I i ~ i $r.rrbery Q ( I z) e ~ • AMOObIao I r ~ ~ ~ O AlClit6CtB ~ I ~ I I I i i . ( I I I I ~ . i i I - _ = - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ . , m ~ - , , . . I , - ~ - ~ I ~ II I - I , i ~ • - _ - ~i . ~ i ~i i ~ - ~ ~ -=~P Of~ ~ I III '_-_e~~.~ I I I' _-___l..~.____ - I_--_I ~i~• I~ Q I I b~0 ~ R , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ - 9 ~ . _ _ - - m ~ : _ ; - - - - - - . i _ - ~ . ~ ~ . - - ~ 1~-------~!~ - - 1---------------1------------j------------- - - ------------,I ~ -1------------j--------------- , I ¢.oNcrruDtNai. Bcnc. secTtorr A3.1 w.rv 0 ~ r , • ' ~ . _ s•i sn ll ~ ' • f' i I i I . ' ~ - - . ' . I O . I I ~i I e»~ - - ~ - . . _ : i ~ _ ~ ; _ T - I •~•~,.a ~ .va I------ ~ _ • _ , - ~ i ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ :.:I - . , , - r ~ ~ - , . : ' I , - i . , . ? ; ~ ~ ; , , ~ . . ~ - - ; I__ - - - - - - - ; • ; i , - -------J L- • -----------~---------------1------------j------------- L 1------------j-------------------..,~_-"..°=~~ ~ I I f-4P ' I n.r. r w.~w M~nl? ~BI _r2\ LONGITIJDINAL HLDG. SEGTIOM A5.1 8eCerbery k ~ ; , ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ; i . , _ . . , ~ . ~ ~ • . ~ - , . i - - - - i , . - . ~ ~~.M. ~ II A~ ~ ~ - • I - , . , - i - ~ . , . , , . . ~ i . s - ~ ~ ------t - - ---------i - ~ j ' w 46 ~ a 1 LO NGITUDINAL BLDG SSCTION W ~ ?.7 ~ 0 7 i . .o.v.~. . . . . . I . --i.., i , i ~z, ~ ~ , ~ ° . ~ r - - - - ~ - ~ ~ . . rr ~ m ..4... ~ - ' - - I .cr rH~ 1 FF~ I `ubNi .I I . • . • ' I ' ~ I I - , • ro y' ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ I I . ~ j : rt ^~M k iwer _0 LITERAL BLDG. 9EC'f10N i o.... y, ] w~ e ' ~ 1 M 1 • .,,..o.o..~....,~....~. - - A5.2 - - - - - - ~ - ~ ° . ~ . i - - r emeitactn ~ ~ I~ Y I 1. (Jl P.G-616 I I ; I • , ~ - - ~ I, I I ti I II ..,a jI . j ~ ~ ~ , I ' ~ i-------- • I -I- - - - - - - - - - - - ,~..a ~ i ~ ~ m.~ v S m....m. j - - I ~ a W ~ ~ LA1'SRAL BLDG. S1~CTIOAI a' ~ NOTE~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ I j ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ _ , - _ ~ . . ~ - I ~ _vd~...,. I~.,.._~. ~ I ' ' - = • . - - ~ - ~ ~i - ~ ~ - . ~ - , , I - - i - - 1 ~ ~ tiy W le-IR~. I ~.?w r. ~w.a M1w.b r• LATERAL BLDG. SECTIOM A93 w~...o~ I A 5 3 ~ - - - ~ ~--T--- - . . _ - c ~ Arcwuct. ~ ~ ~ \ ~ i ..c-uA . . ` , , ~ ~ : ; . ~ • y \ 1 - 1:= - . _ = ~ - - , ~ ' , ; • : ~ a c~ . . ~,~r ..~w~_~~ - ~~r. " I ~ ' ~ ti ,O•~:~.°. '1 ~ J ( d - ' ~ J ° , 1 a~ 19 m 'G~ ' 0 t1lY' YI ~ alze • t,` ` oote j~ ~ - •C~ \ . I7_t ~ ~ . ~ ~ ` ~ , ~ v ~ , . . 1 ~ . - • .'f~; . . \ ~•+c~~~.~~r~~.~ \ L= . . a ~ - ~ ~ - . ~ - - - ~ ~ - _ . ; ~ ' . . I - " ~ f-\ W: 1.~-• IIEIGHT CALCULATION AReIIITF:('TURAL SITI: PI_1N A111 , - I - ~ ~ - - - - - - ~ • e - - . ~ ~ • ~ , ' • ' ~ ; ~ . ~ th ~ ~ . . ~ , ~ . , , , . ' • ' , a . ' • , , ~ ' . ~ . • ~ . ~ : , , . ~ ~ . , - I I 1 2,4~0" I , ~ ' PieYce REVISaON: Jbtvo.)w43.0Sheet: ' Sege&Cag & • Asaociakeo Drsean: ~ Amchitec8s ~.C. A.g.A. Dam_ I I• I~~~ ~ j i ~ f C.~- :..o-~,.r-"-,,r,F•I T . t X '1 . +J' r t ` a , : j ; ~ 1 it yb~~ " Piepce REVISION: )ob No. Jgpq~, SheeE: $egetbetg & Z12 • Associates Drawn: ~ Architects P.C. A.I.A. ~ I I• IZ• 92 • ~ ~ ~ - _.1. \ ..,,i ~ i; ~ ' ~ ' - i . e,~ . ; _ - 1,-~ . , ~ ~ - I . _i... - L------ ~ U I.I.tVAil()NS a W . ~ 61a p . _ - ~ - - ~ - . R ~ , . m~s- ....-ca.-. ~ ~ ~ ~ i . ..o.-•._ a- • m- w .'1. ~ a 11)WEN LEVF.1. 1'LAN UPPER ROOF ~ ~`~sc°rou AaAc:E BaJoaDeNG ,,o•.10• . . . ~ i • . ~ ..~a~ _L - . - ) I Q • ~ w' i NOHiH G5T I ~ " . _ - ~ • ' . I ~ . . ~1, ' • I I ~ ~ ~ _ _~M . . i , • ~ ~ _ - - _ ~ - 4-~- „~.e. - I SlHl~tll WI ST @~ lolOB, GJNTf'9IN ELI:VATIONS ~ {N AN ~ OPLE9f~ 8 IOl~1 I crrr a•,• Pi.c'' oe m BvS S0-UEO..'Q'E68 Bl[lELDBR1eCS Il.3 4 Al l. 1/0' • 10 . . . _ _ v ~ - ATTACHMENT #4 Il 4 • ~OLDEN PEAK OIPERATYONAIL. MANAGEMENT PILAN 1> ~~~DUC7[TON Vaufl Assocaates, Iunc. (66~- t» R7 A 99) has fled aua app9esatdon to amend ghe Approved Developeaaent P?aua for the Go?den Peak Base FaCHl9ty. 'd'he amerudrnents anelude D'e@'IlS&OIIIlS t0 Vehllc9fllaIl' pa?'flSll9lg OQD the S9te9 g9ae desngn and fueactnon of both pub9ac skiee~ and Cha?drean's ~enter drop off, as well as a9terataons to employee parking9 ?aft capacntty, and skn base operationso Iaa the coaerse of the submatga?, VA has m~~~ ~ertaiun represeangatnons reganding the physicaIl sete plan and the operations of the pou-tal. The Town of Vanl Depaatment of cCoenuanunaty Develop8aeeant has e-equested eIlabmragion. Thi§ plauu expauud§ aupoan and supplemeaats the applicagion arac?, tm the • exQeHY$ Ilt flS flHHc0I95?SQeIIIl$ wE$h the appI9Ca$lOdH9 supplangs it. Tlnis Go9dean Peak Macaagement Plaea Ils aaatecnded -to enhance the ezperieraces of gaaes$s to Vacl aaaa~ of the resgdengs o$' the Go?den ]Peak ne6ghboa-hood in a grnanraer consnstent svuth the goafls aaud objecteves of.ghe agreement between gfine Town of Vanl /66TOV99) $IDIQ~ Valll E~53oc6a$es $0 HHDaYHage ~DeagS pe1CflOQ~3 HIID $~lHS 9'eSOH'$ cOIHHIH1LiHflfl~'. IHIl l effecg, gflne ganeasanres proposed fln thus pRan aa-e means of aanaenaging or controlll6ng the deuuaaends anpoun gifne Golldeun lPeaik pouta~ and the impacts upon uts sura-ouruding uunfrastraacgaare. 'd'8ne coneept§ and prenciples of the Progrann T0 1Vlanage Peak Periods Agreernent (the 66t11greeHHIlCHdLL99) betweean TOV and VA are t@nerefore incou-poragec? by refereance ento t9na§ managerneng p9ano . 2 . ~ P A reality that must be recognized in ezamining the creation of infrastructure ~ and operational systems for Golden Peak or Vail at llarge is that both the ski ' company and the greater Vail comrnunity. are engaged in the winter and summer resort business. For reasons beyond the complete control of the community the demands far and use of resort goods and services will always be subject to specifac or isolated events such as the Christmas holiday or a world class competitive or cultural event. Events such as these will by necessity mean that Vail will egperience surges or, peaks of visitor use that may be mitigated, but will not be enterely overcome or eliminated by investrreent in Inard assets. To the egtent that such high demand events tax the capacity of our systems and our collective patience, we r¢iust also acknowledge that these events, if well managed, are also what give us. life, vitality,,excitement and special appeal. • It is the effort to "manage well" that leads to the creation of this plan. In its application VA has proposed significant physical improvements to the Golden Peak portal. These include: - doubling the skier drop off zone capacities; - improving drop of$' flow and function; - giving locational primacy to public transit; - structuring and landscaping private auto parking; - improving lift access to balance portal use across the Village; and - improving base lodge facilities for the guest and local alike. ~ 3 V ~ 'd'hns urtna,por nnves$meaaa in haa-d assets satisfies to the flnighesg degree possibBe t9ae programmatuc reqaenregaaeaats of ghe Golden Peak project's planneeng professionals. The proposed maanagemeng techneques whgch fo19ow are nneant to be flezeb9e gflflfldeIlIl&?e3 andl dlyaaauanuc toolls whfich may be altered, revised, enhances?, or eveea elHm&flflated'ovCII' tnme as uneeds requare to 66HQHaHHage we1199e AQDd, whi9e these tec9nngques are descrubed in geraaas of VA or 'g'OV responsnbilities, et must be aaotec~ that o$hea-s, gltne greater Vaafl communaty and each and every Goflden Pealc neighbor, uaauust flakewise contrnbante, acg a'esponsibly and greag otiaers equitab9y in managing or 1IEQllgllgagHHH~ the ?HAllpac$S 01F t&Se9 grow$h and congesgaon during peak peraods vvsthuan oanu- co¢nnuanaune4y. IEor gheer parts, paae-sua¢ng to ghe Agreeagaeng, both VA and TOV have ~ ammediate respouusubaflntnes to umdea-take groavth management aneasuu-es. Section ffi (pages 1 Il-16) o$' the Agreement outlieues these umatfledaate responsebi9ities uander Tiea~ ~ of tIltne Naan. VA93 oQDQ9ga$fl06HS H8&cBl9de FHlCaSflflreS @'~Yh&CpD [9E9ght IIII9Y$iga$e AdH9paC$S a$ Golden Peak sanch as provad'ang bus passes to appropraate egnployees 6'0r aase on gllae Towun o$' Van? sysgem, eHHc09flH'agIlHIlg Cafl'pOOI9IIlg9 agDd pIIIrSBIlflIIg Pa9'YZ aQ9d RIdC Sfl$eS fOH' euruployeese TOV9s OUYllHgaLLiOIIIlSq sea forth aaa ghe Agreerneaat, inc9aade controlling peak tra~~ and parknng n$sanes, prodaecguve manageanent of grafrie circulatgon aeed parkang systems, creatuve aQlocagnon of the baus servgce, effectnve aatiaageoaa o$' ?aw ¢n4'orcemean$ persoaenefl, aandl betger dflS$H'Hb9fl$IOHIl o$' skieas to d'nft'erent base area faCIll?tIleS. 4 'r For these purposes it is pertinernt to note that in the Agreememt "Peak ~ Periods" are def ned as: Christmas Peak: That period which eztends between December 26 and December 31; and Hagh Season: That period which includes Presidents' Weekend and each weekend beginning the third weekend in February through the end of March. "Nonpeak Periods" are def ned as: Those periods falling outside of the Christmas Peak and High Season and which normally anclude the early ski season, Thamksgiving, the pre- mid-February period, and the late s9ce ~ Christmas Period, the January to season. " Another pertinent concept in the Managed Growth Agreement is the benchmark capacity of the mountain which has been defined as 19,900 skiers at one time ("SAOT"). The theory behind the Managed Growth Agreement ns to implement tiers of management techniques to control infrastructure demands and operations at or below the 19,900 SAOT threshold. An additional facgor for consideration is the design day standard for Golden Peak planning studies and infrastructure assessment which is 15,000 SAOT, a typical skier day count for the ~ ~ g a ~ caarrent EChristmas Peak. The physacal nnfrastrucaanre of Goldeaa Peak ns designed go accomugaodage the poe-taQ deganands o$' a 15,000 SAOT event. The AssessHaaeent cCommitgee, described en Section VI of the Agreement, us the euatnty charged wugfln moneton-ing, evaluating, and refineng the operatioaas o9' the couregaaaanngy manageaunent plan. ]~or the purposes of this Agreeme¢et, the Assessment COII6IlIIDIlP$$ee fiS fl?keVY?Se ChaH'gCd wll$h th13 reSpOLIlSflbId&tyy QDYBt Ht IlS UflflIldCI'S$OOd tY1aQ fOIl' ghese pua-poses the Assessmeant Committee may de9egate ats a'evuew fiunction to the Vaell 'IC~anspoatatuoan ']Cask Force oa' other desQgnee and shall anc&ude representatives of alge affec$ed GogdeYIl Peak dfleIlgIHb01'hOOd 9n $I1C fl'evIeVY pIl'OCCSS. The pro,pect compmnents or elements wh6ch might be consneiered for tiered management g~chanuq anes ag Goldean Peak flncflaflde the fo1lowHng: (a) Managed ~ Parkang Strucgure9 (b) Pubflnc Skier and Chn?dren9s Center Drop-off Areas9 (e) ]Empfloyee lParking9 (d) Mountanau Operations; (e) Loca9 and Community Programs, saach as 9)EVO`v lml SkIl (Cflub Vaflfl ACtl`'&tfleS`s (g) Adult and Children's Ska Schmo@9 (h) ]Loadnang, Deluv~~ Trash Remova9'q (1) SIIIIOW 1711anagemCntq (.U) Tic?ceting; and (lk) Specnall lEventse U. MANAG1ED PA G S'ICRUCTURE. The App a'oved Deve9opment PEan of 1984 depacted 130 saee-face parlflcaaag spaces, prumarnly Qocaged on the noatln side of"Tu-act F a?ong Vaa@ Valley Drive for alll VaII'llegHeS off aasers o~ th'ss pautgcu?afl' portal and 6 an$erioe- parYdng spaces for the resuderataafl couedouanenbums. The Cheldren's Center p@aen of 1988 u'equared 12 spaces. . 6 ^ ~ 7Caken together these total 148 spaces for drop off and parking. Presently the ~ surface lot egisting at Golden Peak holds approgimately 150 automobiles or less dePending on the amount of snow storage on the lot and the efficiencies of car storage. Of these 150 spaces roughly 18-20 are used by ernployees; Spraddle Creek ProPerty Owners reserve and utilize 8 spaces; 4 spaces are used 4'0r Cross Country Ski Van pick-up and drop-off; and approgianately 118 spaces are available for use by the skiing public for a fee. Parking requirements for the Ski Base/Recreation District are addressed in Section 18.39.230 of the Vail Ordinances which reads: . "Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52 and/or as specified on the Approved Development Plan."(emphasis supplied) ~ The ?anguage of this section permits and contemplates a parking function and design unique to this district aced its development plan. In response to this umique environment the parking structure proposed in this plan consists of 148 parking spaces (including 5 handicapped or ADA spaces) located at or below the street elevation and landscaped across the top to provide an aesthetic benefit to the development and the surrounding neighborhood. The fundamental concept of the organization and management of these parking spaces, the equivalent of a Tier I management techn6que, is to create a managed or reserved "right to park" mechanism desagned to control the availability and use of the spaces and hence cut down on indascriminate traffic flows while providing for and paying for the aesthetic ~ 9 begaef~' g@ae flaana~scaped sgraacgaa¢~e. The anechanesa~n foa'iatae0ated to p~'ovede ghi§ ~ its o II&HaIIlagCd paH'kIlHIlg pH'odll&C$ $o the p9Hbl9C 9S a Yfl0&1-equety c?ub mr assoc'sation of up to 500 ugne¢nbeu-s who woun9d have the right to park naa ghis structaare foa' a$'ee. Two taers of membershap uau the assoceagnon aa-e contemp?ated. The frst tflC@' VNmH&Id C03fl3IlS$ 0f uap go 50 memfl~ers who woaald have anglnt to park in an adentif eaIl reserved paa'kiaag ~ spacee ']Che s~~ond tuea- of meHeubers would be up go 450 peopIle who hawe a reght to park nn the sgrancganre baseafl upon a monetored and computer conta'olled a'eservataons sgeuaa. Itfls the IlEHte9flt Of gpH~ ~pplflCaflflt t0 llY9flt6alfly OffeIl' SO fIlH'St tllel'.aH1d ZOO SCcOnd Sy aeer membersllnnps to the pub?ac. Parkang memberstaeps vvouQd be so?d ien the fal9 of 1995 contnngeunt anpoau fanall approvafl of the GoQden lPeak Base Facnlity Projecg by the Towua off Vaall and su$'ricaent subseraptions go comanence construcgion of the pafl'knng ~ structure en the sprang of 1996, but no flater tYaan spriaag of 1997. In the event thag the unecessaa-y snnbsca-aptions a¢'e not forthcoaniaag to commence constructaon ian 1999, VAE 'Wulll oaautuate dnscussnon§ wutln the Town Counei9 concerning payment an 9etan off par9cnng alternatnves. -'ff'llne $nrsg tner member woaald secure a e'aglat to ense apartucular paa'king space oua a year -u'oannd basn$. Hence, the raggo of fie'st tuer neembeu-s ao par9cang space§ reseeved $'or tflnenr anse wmuld lbe flto fl. The second taee- enembers woaald have a yeai'- rouaand u'nght to un~~ ~ ~arkaetg space based upon ae'aaflabil'aty aend pa'aou- reservatfloun, monatored lby a compaater~ed rotatfloan systeaee to nnsanre ecganutab?e and optimnzed ansea H9Ilit8$l offerauag off second taer membershiqns vvould constntute a ratao of T@ne 8 `t approximately 2 members to every parking space. These,members would call the • arking manager more than 24-hours in advance to reserve their use of available P spaces. A reservation list from among the members would be compiled daily for tlhe management of entry access by personnel stationed in the attendant booth at the entry ta the structure. Access anto the structure would be permitted upon presentation of a photo I.D. identifyang the bearer as a member and a confirmataon of a reserved parking space on the parking avai9ability list. In the event that alll parkirng spaces are not fully reserved and utilized by the club members, VA, as operator of tlae facility, reserves the right at any time of the • year to utilize unreserved spaces for other guests, members of the skiing public, employees or other persons who li9cewise must call and reserve a space less than 24- non-members would be permitted only ~ hours in advance. This short-notsce use by on a daily basis by reservation. However, this managed operational feature evould ' ezpand the availabte user groups and increase the utilization of the structure an non- peak peraods without adding appreciable, unvvanted traffic. Further, if the utility of the structure can be maxnmized by offering additional nnemberships for sale, VA wi11 do so after the first year of operation establishes typical occupancies. M. SKIER DROP OFF Skier drop off occurs presently on the east side of the egistnng Golden lPeak structure and 'ammediateiy to the north of the Children's Center. Ezisting conditions provide for 21 head-in spaces adjacent to the Children's Center arnd 10 ~ 9 0 para19e?, or actuve parflcnang spas.e§, gn a floop drop-off area foir the general paab"c, ~ toga9eng 31 spaces canrreaut9y ded'acated to all drop-off fuuactioae§. ']fhe proposcd plan neau-fly doanb9es gllnns ~apaCIl$y VDy p H'08'9dflHdg fOQ' 30 flnead-en spaces dedicated ao ChnE~~en's Ceuater dro~ off aand 29 spaces for genera9 skier du'op off noeth of the propo§ed bnaildnung, totaflnng 59 spaces foa' skier drop off at alaes poataflo (A.) lHga. MaHHagtEHE~ent YIHeas9IlH'eS $o be ?IIH1deY'Qa{ZeIH aHIl a sCq?ledl$9aI faSflfl9oIll couacanrreantlly wnglln redevelopmeuug nencludeo 1. DUIlQ'IlIIIlg ghe (Chfl'fl5$maS Peak pefl 10d and Pa'esgdents' Weekens9 VA wnlfl . s~aff g?ue Geunerafl Skier and Chilcls-ean's Cenger afrop off zones wet?n 6 peopde, spflu~ ~etweeun the drop off zones as te'affac needs demand, during peak are-uv~~ And depau-Qaaa-e hoaars or appa'ozieaaate9y 6rom 8,30 to 10 aom. aand 3 • p.mno to 4e30 p.m. 'd'hese traffic manager§ wall d'nrecg tratfic, assesg and expedl'ate gltne fload'uuag auad aanfloading of passeuageas and eqeaepHnent, encourage the tngunefly and swnfg departure o6 vehec9es, aaed enforce u'estrictaons agaens4 aauuautl~orIlZed parlkaaag by calleng 6or the removad or gowing of o41'ena?in~ ~ehncflese Daniruung the High Sea§on pee-aod VA we?ll §taff ghe Generafl Skaea~ and cCtanBdrew's du'op mff zones with 2 g~ 4 peopfle, sp?it betweeun tflae zones as trafnc uneeds dlema¢ad aflanraaug peak aa-rnva9 and depaa-taare houa's. 3. DurHng non-p~ak pefl'llOd3 aII960 d?HH'llIIHg, e9'eHHarig OD' 699ght h011Il's $fDe dH'oQD off zmwes woaulldl lbe s~affed or managed upon ahe operataona? d'ascregion o6 VA a§ 10 r' may be needed to prevent congestion or vehicle stacking into Vail Valley • Drive or the bus lane. During these periods and times, except for special events, VA will permit parking by the general public in the drop-off zone surface spaces consistent with the practice and use of other VA parking lots such as North Day lot. 4. Permanent, static, signage at the top of Blue Cow Chute will be installled by TOV indicating that there is no public parking at Golden Peak arnd that only Children's Center and skier drop off is permitted. 5, In Section V(page 25) of the Agreement additional skier drop off zones have been identified as "pressing current transportation and circulation needs". VA will gherefore cooperate with the TOV in identifying additional ~ skier drop offf zones elsewhere in the town including Ford Park, the M[ain Parking Structure, Lionshead, and other locations which will be formaluzed ' and improved by the Town of Vail. Initially TOV will develop and implement a plan for general skier drop on the upper deck of the Transportation Center utilizing ezisting physical improvements and facilnties. 6. Upon the conclusion of each Peak Period and ski season the Assessment Committee or its designee, will specifically assess access to and egress from the mountain at Golden Peak, together with traffic and drop off impacts associated with the skier movements and will make recommendations for • Illl a ~ ad'a~sgusaeunts or n~n~pu~oe~eugnea~g$ to g~ae '~ieH' ~ ¢aaaaeageaaae~nt ttcflnnit~aaes ~ descrnbed alboveo (lg,) ']Cuer Iun the eveuet that soiaee or aflll of the Taer I ataanagemeunQ ~~channqanes abode hade been amp9eanenteafi aand traffric ~onge$tioan dn the drop off zouue§ sgnllll resanlt§ nn vehnc8e stacking gnto the sgreeg or bars lane§ g~ ~ degruuuneun$~~ ordanat'y mperateon o6 the fln$'u'astn'aacgure, ghen the fo&lownng sancce§sae~e manageanent eff0rt$ wi?fl be aenderta?cen 6n gtrc next _ sancceeaflnaflg slkn §easoane 1. ~n.d/or TOV walfl nmplement add'ntiona9 Tner g gechanuques whic?a have unot yea beeun emp9myed or wi9fl eeahance t9aose Teer gtechnaques alreaeiy in aase • accordnung to the recommendateoaas of the Assessment Committee> 2e 7COV, panu-sunant to og§ genera6 obligations un the Agreemeant to amplemeng }pro-acgnve mauaageYaae¢ag effoa-ts iau coord'nnatioan watln VA to controY gratTic, w61ll nuacrease antudnzatnoun of llaw enforcemeeu4 personaaefl dua'ong peak periods uun the upnaana~emeung off traffnc at Golden Peak (Sectaon ffie A. 2< a., page 13). 3. Ba§ed anpou~ the uuanpacts of tratTic congesguon and as aransportatao,n needs afleuunand, 'ICOd wndfl ampllement an e9ectronnc signage prograan whech wou9all duspday punessages ouu Qflne toavn arteraaIls regardeng traffee cond'etio¢as wutll~~~ the toewn paa'king garage§, drop off zoaae grafac sgatans conaflfltnons and lift m~~ ~ondntuouns at the base pou-taQs. 12 ~ Iy; EMPLOYEE PAItKING Presently 18 to 20 VA employees Park at Golden Peak of the approgimately . 500 employees who are based there in Peak Periods. Another 25 to 30 spaces are . seasonally leased by VA from third parties for employee parking. The remaining 90% of Golden Peak based employees park in public lots, use pubtuc transit, or use other private parking spots. A, Tier I. The following management techniques will be impleinemted ment to mitigate employee transpoe-tation sequentially upon redeve9op impacts and serve the needs of the coinmunity's employees: 1. VA, together with TOV, will enter into negotiations with the Colorado ployee park and • Department of Transportation to secure, if possible, an em ride intercept lot on Highway 6 in Eagle-Vail. This lot would be used for VA and TOV eRnployees to park their vehicles in Eagle-Vail and utilize tablished public transportation routes to conQinue on to their job locations es in Vail. In the event the CDOT site is not available or unsuitable, other sites wi91 be located and secured for a park and ride lot. 2. To the extent space availability egists during non-peak periods, V. A. will ermit managed employee parking by reservation in the parking structure at P . Golden Peak. , ~ 13 ~ 3. Daarnng Peak Peireos9s VA eHnployees we9? carpoo9 go tlae soccer f eld Dot paarsanaunQ to t8ne Ho?aday Traffic and Parking P9an as managed and operaged lby 7COd or algerunatuvelly a§ maueaged by VA. 41e Danruang Ql~~ ~hrisgmas peak pernod-aaadq in faCLLq ezttndang beyond 'nt from December 24 nnntnll Janaaau-y ll in aHny geven year, ~A wafll emplleeneng ngs Holuday 'ICra4fnc aun~ ~arkang Plane Il)aarnng thas peraod VA wall providt ffrte baa§ gackea$ ~or the Avon/Beaver Creek bu$ syst-em to al9 Goldeae Peak based §~aff. Parlknng in \VA lots such as West Day ILot ancIl North I?ay Lot, wnllfl be avaaflabfle 4'or fu'ee to emp9oyees who carpoo9. Euaiployees anot carpooling we9l lbe charge¢? a feeo 5e VA wnDll adaIl g9ne Holy Cross Lot to uts par9cing inveiatory for peak peraod • euanp9o~~~ ~arpoo9ang. 6. A§ nece§§arys VA @'NAflIl aSS9gn eHI9plOyeeS caH'pOOIIIIg QOC'cit90I1S 9IE paiF't9CBYYar llots auuuong the W¢st Day, North Day ancff Holy Cross propeaties aaed manage euutry acce§s uunto these pu'operkies. 7. VA wnfl9 llease 20 parking spaces 6rom a third paa-ty or, alternatevely9 pnnrcIluase 20 66bAQae99 ~arkiIIflg passe§ 4'rom the TOV for parking in the town §traactanres. S. Upoan Bhe conclansnon of ~~ch Peak Pernod and gfine skn season, the Asses§agneuat Comannggee ou- uts designee will uaaonatmr ghe Tder I techniqaaes 14 described above assess the operational results, and make recomirnendatioms ~ , for alterations or enhancements to the plan. (g,) Tier U. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management techngques have been implemented and employee parking and transit is stil& a concern, additional methods of employee trarnsit and parkang wil9 be undertaken at the recommendation of the Assessment Committee or its designee. V. MOUNTAIN OPERATIONS (A,) Tier I. Management measures to be undertaken during peak periods in a sequential fashion concurrently with redevelopment include: 1. VA will eztend its periods of mountain operataons later into the day (e.g. i until 4•00 p.m.) to spread out the departure times of skiers 6rom the mountain. " 2. Employee passes will be restricted during the Cinristmas Peak and Presidents' weekend. 3. Improvements to the food and beverage offering at the base facility restaurant, irncluding apres ski and dinner offerings, will be designed to attract the skiing public and stagger the public's departure from the poY-tal . 4, VA will cooperate and coordinate with TOV and the Colorado ' Department of Transportation regarding the installation of signage at base facilities, including Golden Peak, advising departing skiers of road conditions • ll~ a ~ dv~e~s~, envatn~ng oi' advising depaa~tung skiers go stay auad, nf coeadl'ntuo~ns are aQateIC llIlfl the vIlllage aIlfld d@'a@'N 099$ ttie9H' H~epaII'tul'e tHmCSe . ga Npon the conc9ansion of eac6u Peak Peraod and the ska season the Asse§smeaag cCoavnmIl$gee ou' ats designee wel9 assess uanountain opefl'atfion flmpacts and uanall~e recommeuudagnons for ad,gustanents or flHnprovemeaets to the 'ICaea- I manageuuaeueg techaeiques descrabed abovee (Bo) 'lCne~ I[an the eve~sg that some or a?ll o~' the '~nee~ I[ ananageme~a~ teChIIllflqbfle5 ha@~e betEH9 IlIIHHple661eYflte(D and congestion Stflll exiSt3 Il1Il g~~ ~orta8 QBIfl?'lllflg &D~~k peIl'iod5y t9aen the following successeve managemeaet effoats wfllfl be anncflertakeun nan the nezt succeeding ski season or Peak Period: • b, `YA aIIIldI/oiC T~V w&?l flH9flp1eIYleH1t add9tlOY?ad T9Cr I meaSfl16'eS idI11CI3 haVe uuot yet lb~en enaployed or wall enhaaxce those Tier gtechneques a9ready in aase accordnng to the recougumendations of the Assessmeng Conemattee oa' ets designee> . 2e VA wn~~ ~onteuuaae to take operateonal neeasures to balance the funncguouaa9uty aend use of ngs poatals, as well as oaa-HE90@IlII9$afln CflH'C91,atiOIIH. v][. D]EVO/LOCA]L ANBD eCOMMUNITY ]PItOGI8AM5 66}WEtl' O99 Ils aHQ aLL/brevQation Ror the VaIltl lll'eveAopment Team9 a Cd9ildren9s SYell SchooIl Proga'am consesteaag of 300 chflla?e'eau w9nich offers specna?ized ski schoo? classes a~ chaldreua of locals aH~~ firo~t range skaerso 7Che hegtn concentrat6on of UocaO§ 16 t esults in an inordinately high drop off iinpact on non- ~ participating in the progra~n r peak Saturdays which minaics peak conditions throughout the season. (A,) Tier I. Measures to be sequentially undertaken concurrently with , redevelopment include: 1, The DEVO program does not run during the Christmas Peak or mver Presidents' Weekend. The progratn will continue to be lemited in ghis fashion. 2. Arrivals for the DEVO program will be staggered in advance of the typical ski school or mountain opening times. DEVO arraval will be ~ scheduled for 8:30 a.m., oa?e-half hour prior to lift opening. Pick up will likewise be scheduled earlier than regular mountain closure. ~ 3. Drop off for DEVO will be formalized and managed by DEVO instructors in the Golden lPeak skier drop off zones to prevent stacking into the streets. 4. VA will investigate splitting the DEVO program further and masing some portion of the program in Lionshead or staging it at other drop off zones. For egample, moving the Freestyle Program, approgimately 15% of tlne DEVO skiers, to another drop off zone such as the TOV structure will be exPlored and implemented if alternate drop offs are created. Staging IDEVO out of the Lionshead Teen Center will also be egplored with TOV, including the creation of short-term, 30 eaiinute, drop-off and pick-up parking spaces in the Lionshead Parking Structure. . ~ a g~ • 5. DlEVO race events will be moved in vvhole or 'san part go other ?oca? coaflrses. 6. U~on t}He cpQHcUflIlSllOII& 0f each 3,{D SCaSOHfl the ASSeSSIt9eH9$ COHY9IIflAttee Od' IltS aBesngunee will assess ghe i¢npacts caansed by the DEVO prograan ancE aaaake recoYanmendagaons for adjaastment or amprovennent to the 7Ceer g techaeeques descrnbe¢ll abode. (Ba) Iun ghe event that socane or all of the Tier I techniqaaes have been ump9ementeaIl auad DEVO s$ill adverse&y impacts portall congestaon tlaea~ the $'o1?ownung snnccessive management efforts will be undeutaken naa the nezt s?d §easmun or Peak Periosfle 1. DEVO will be reIoeaged iea paat or nn whofle to otEner poatals, iaecluddaag ~ dowan-vafllley poa-ta9s accesseng Beaver tCu'eek Moua?gaino 2. DEVO and ogher saach 9oca1 programs will be germinatedo VU, SK1[ CILN~ ~AEL SkIl ClUHb VallV llS a pfl'llVagey noea-pl'ofit Skfl clLflb WhiCdIl IlS 6Aot OWHIed, operated, or managedl by VA. VAq hOVVCVerq pa'ovides on-naoaantain access for gu'aining and racang ewean$s for Ski c~~~b Van?. Sk9 ClH9b Vafll $1C'aHEEllHYg aCCOflIlII9tS fOr app1'OZ@mately 60,000 gate s~art§ per y~ar and Ska C9n~~ ~~~l racamg actIlV9t9eS accoaent foir aan a6fldHtllOH11~l 15,000 gage staa-ts per year. FGeaaeral?y racung activity, enc?udang Skn C?aab Vaill, ranens 4'roagu 8:30 aam. untnll 4030 p.mo and frequentfly occaars seven days per week daarneng the skn season. . 18 r 1Vlanagement measures to be taken concurrently with (A,) Taer I. ~ redevelopment include: 1. Ski Club Vail programs will be coordinated, vvith other special evemts, as was done during the 1994/1995 season, to prevent overcrowding of groups in the portal at any one time. ` 2. Start times for Ski Club Vail dureng peak pernods and high season willl be coordinated so that Ski Club Vail arrival tiHnes will occur before the 9a.m. peak hour rush and will be terminated tater in the' afternoon to spread the . departure from the ski mountain. 3. VA well alllow and encourage Ski Club Vail users to arrive and depart using the General Skier Drop-off Zone. ~ 4, Upon the conclusion of the ski season, the Assessment Committee or its designee will monitor the Tier I techniques described above, assess the impact of Ski Club Vail on the use and efficiencies of the portal and make recommendations for alterations or enhancements to the plan. (g.) Tier U. In the event that some or all of the Tier I measures have been lemented and Ski Club Vail still poses logistical problems for the iinp optimized use of the portal; the recommendations of the Assessment Committee or its designee wil1 be implemented. 1. Ski Club Vail will be terminated in whole or 'in part in its use af ghe Golden Peak race courses and base facility. ~ 19 VM. ADW LT A1~~ ~HILDRJL+1V 9 S SKL ~~~~~~S The Gofldlean Pealk portafl as somewhat unaque in that ut supports a faa9O cflnnfldreaa's slkn schooll, unc9udang uaursery, as well as the aduit skn schooll. ~pprozimately 39g000 Skll SCll?OOLL StBHdeQHtS pCr SeaSOIIIlq or an average 264 per day, are se6'@rflced at ghHS ]EDoII't`a6l. 7Cllne saze and scope of skn schooll activegaes in the poatal are unataeraIllly constraaneaD by g9ne saze of the base area facilit6eso The Ciaeldren's Skn Schooll in pautacunflau' us 4'aaauctiona91y 9eaainted by ttne bualciing size and the skn yaa'c~ avagHable gpH' llHIlQ?'odll?ctoII'y chHldIl'eHIl9S ClaSSeSe (Ae) 'ICier 1. Maaeagement measua-es to be undertaken in a sequential fashuon ~oncanrreuatdy wuth reaYeveloprraent nnc9udea . Ile Sid schoo? classes wall be coordgaeaged with morning arreva8s of other specnall an§er groups s~ that ski school c9asses wi11 sequentially foliow t9ae aIl'@'H9'afl $9QllIl~~ of ~theIC gIl'OB9pS aY1tI aC$ivIl$9e3 aild SpII'ead Ol&$ pOC"tal aT&'IllraIS. 2< VA wn9Il emphasize a "one sgop shop99 0f flessons and eqeagpment, anclead'nng overanng9na storage, wflaisfln wall a-ec9aace the uaeed for arravad by private aantouuaobn?e a§ we9l as reduce dvvel@ tume§ o$' auaomobiles whech do arrsve fou~ off. 3e VA wullfl p¢'omote in nts marketuaag materials ghe convenienct of pnnb9nc gra¢nsn~ whnch seuwnces the ae-eae 4. VA wnflIl exp?ore the empleagaentagion ot ae?epinone or elec$ronec Q?H'e]CegIl$tICatHoIIH IlIN SkH 3ch0ol, 6nclead'nng the Chi9dren's Sku School, 6n an effoet 20 r to cut down the dwell times of automobiles dropping skiers off for ski school . registration. 5. Upon the conclusion of each Peak Peraod and the ski season, the Assessment Committee or its designee(will assess congestion in the portal related to ski school activities and rgeake recomrnendations for adjustments or improvemeats to the Tier I management techniques discussed above. ' (B.) Teer U. In the event that some or all of the Tier I management techniques have been implemented and congestion associatecD with the sllci schools still results in crowding in the portal then the followwung additional ananagement steps will be sequeratially implemented: 1. The recommendations for improvements or adjustments made by tlae Assesspnent Committee or igs desi nee will be instituted in the followin • ~ g season or Peak Period. 2. VA will make improvemerats to its Lionshead Sku School facilities upon the redevelopment of that portal taking pressure off of the Golden Peak portal. IX. LOADING, DELIVERY AND TRASH REMOVAL The Golden Peak Base Facility requires the delivery of food and liqwor for its restaurant operations and trash arnd recycling pick-up for all functions located at Golden Peak. Currently, food and liquor delivery takes place daily between 6:00 a.rni. and 7:00 a.rn. and again between 5:00 p.rn. and 6:00 p.m. The majoe-ity of ~ 21 6 ~ ffood and 9uquor s8efle~erues are ffursg sorted out ag the Gonc9ola Bueldiaag 6¢n Lionslnead, tltaen dellavered go Go9den Peak by VA employees. Cnnrreng9y, ghere us ¢~o foraanaQ 9oad'nng dock at Golden Pea9c whieh results aau the HHeed fO?' t4'd'o (2) daIlly f00d a69d lE(]UAOd' deIIlve9'y $r9(DS. Yn additaorn, there ns a grash compacgor at GoDdeua Peak caarreaet?y avhech resaaRts an the need for daa8y grastn colllec$non at 7:00 aomoe Recyc9ing peck-up 6s done by VA and occuas as needed concuru~en$ly waglln ffood auud 9iqaaor drop-off. gt as estnana$ed t?aat caarreant delaveay gnmes wa?? remanun gllae same go awoid iraterference wit9n skier trafric, thoug9a the addfitnon o$' a 4'ormall Road'nng area and storage may recluce the euuamber of daily del'aven-y grcps by VA ffrom flwo (2) to one (1)0 The adc9ation of a ga-ash correpactou- ag Go9den Peak shoau9d resDuce the frequency of daily greps requnred for trash pick-aap, • (Ao) 7Cner 1. Measaares to be aandertakeet coencagrrently wath redeve9opaaient unclludee Il. DeRaveuy tnapnes wn?? be managed so that ¢ao deoivery or grash pick-up welfl occaar danrnung the hoaua-s of 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. t0 5:00 p.m. 2. 'g'lfne Assesspuuent Commattee we?l review and assess gruc9c deleverees aand $ee-wwace at the coaac?usno~ of each ske season and unake recommendatnons £or aYgeratno¢ns or Hmprovements as necessarye (B<) 'd'aer B. In the event that soarae or all? o$' the above measures have been ump9emenged and u4' Qoaa~ing, de8every and/or grash a~emova@ resaelts uaa 22 , operational inefficiencies in the portal then the following management ~ techniques will be ienplemented in the nezt succeeding ski season: 1. The recommendations of the Assessment Committee will be umplemented. 2. VA will endeavor to deliver larger loads directly to G'olden Peak and store additional food amd beverage on site thus reducing the number of trips or will arrange night delivery to avoid tratTic congestion. X. SNOW MANAGEIVYENT Snow unanagement at Golden Peak will be conducted in a manner similar to that in other VA portals. Snow storage zones have been depicted upon the revnsed snow storage map prepared and subrraitted with the Application. (A.) Tier I. The following management efforts will be undertaken with respect to snow storage and management during the ski season, including ~ peak and high season periods. 1. VA will by contract with third parties or through its own forces plow all areas of vehicular circulation as depicted on the Snovv Management Plan by 6 a.m. every morning upon a snowfall of 4 or more inches. 2. VA, through its own forces, will remove snow from sidewaflks and plaza areas depacted upon the Snow Management Plan by means of a bobcat, an ATV and/or by hand betwcen the hours of 7 and 8;30 on all mornings following a snowfaIll of 4 inches or more. • 23 ~ ~ 3. VA waflD StOD'e 5IlIl0w iQfl $empo&'dd'y snow S$OY'age a8'eaS 9U'HthAff9 the drop off zones and wethnn two go seven days of a 4" s'nowfall we69 aase 9oaders and trancks to remode t9ae snow stored thea-e and transpoat et frorra the site. ][mpacts o~ traTnc congestnon wil9 determaaa~ the speed aandl frequency of reaaeovafl of snow frougn the temporaay snow sgorage arease VA will reenove snow nmmednatelly uf snow storage resu9ts aaa coaagestuoan en t?ne drop-off aorees caaaseng aauto s~~ckang nnto the streeto 4e At t1~~ end o6 each Peak lPereod and ghe sku season gflne Assessrnent Comageatgee or nts deseganee wilfl review snow remowa9 perforanance dane-eng the season and, as uaecessau-y, make reconnmendataons for adjustmercts or nmproveauaen$s the Tner I tec@anaques descrabed above. • (B.) Tuer U. ffuu the event ghat some or a?9 off the Taer g techneques designed go manage snow have not effecgave9y cleared the snow from the drop off zones oa- ot9ner panbHuc areas and/or have aanpac$ed circaalatuon on the paabflic streegs, t?neau VA wn?? uueup9emeant recomaraenda#aons made by g9ne Assessment Couuamuttee ou- nts desugnee. XI. SP]EtCIfA]L.1EVEN7['S AND SKY RAcCING Gmllsfeen PeaIk ns the snge of many slca races and specna9 evengs daaring the coaarse of a ski seasone TypQeallg~ the racung seasoaa begins an nnid-I)ecember aaud u-uns thu-oang?n ear9y A\pru?. Traannng for skn rracnng can be broken down as fo9lows: Sku C?ub Vai? generates 60,000 gate s~arts per year; llnigh school prmgrams add 7,500 24 ~ gate starts per year; and corporate/club training events add 7,500 nnore starts per • year. Actual racing starts for these three user groups are approzimately 15,000 gate _ starts per year for Ski Club Vail, with an additional 2,000 starts per year for local high school programs, and 10,000 starts per year for corporate and club racing. These total roughly 102,000 gate starts per year and average 4.5 ski racing events ger week. Daily activity for ski racing typically commences at 8:30 a.m. ared continues until 4:30 p.m. Of these race events tivo or three major tetevised edents ; occur each year, not all of which are headquartered out of the Golden Peak course. These include the Pro Tour, FIS World Cup and North American Trophy Series races. In 1999 the World Championships will be held at Vail and opening ceremonies are scheduled for Golden Peak. Race starts and demand for training space have been growing steadily for the past decade. • Special Events which occur at Golden Peak, an addntion to the routine racing programs, include various snowboarding events which draw typically 100 to 250 people, the U.S. Pro Tour which draws about 500 people, and~ Hot Winter Nights evemts which draw 500 to 1000 people typically in February and March and up to 3000 people during the Christmas holiday. (A.) Tier I. Macaagement techniques already utilized arad in place at Golden Peak or which will be implement with redevelopment include: I ' ~ , 25 ~ • Ile Suuowlboard6uug events typ6ca91y he?d un uaon-peak pereods are aasua9fly sma?ll wuth meuanmall naunpact on poutaG arrivals or use. Aa-c-nvals aaad staging of event pau-tncnpaunts wnflll be agaanaged wuth VA persoaanefl on an 66as needed99 basiso Hot Wnuu~~r Nughg§ events are he1d duraang off hoaars and do ueot nnterfere wnt9a mg9ner poutall arrewa9s or demands on nnfrastruetureo These wd9fl lbe maaaagec? wngh VA personne~ on an 66as Qaeei~a.8ern.7199 basas. 3e Ia'1[a,por eveunts, saach as gelevised F][S racireg events, $he Wor9dl Clfuampnonshnps, ma,por becycle race eveuegs, anaff surnereer firewor?s welIl. he unnaanagedl t8nroungh the standard specia9 event pernaittiaag process of the 'd'OV. 4e At t9ue eund of eacln ]Peak Period and skn seasoan the Assessmen$ Coanmittee or nts deSHgHIlee @'6'Ilflfl revaew and make recommeaudateons soncerning Specaall ~ lEveaats aand raca¢ag actuvnties at Go9cien Peak and tlEnear empacgs oea the porta9 auud couugestnoun nuu the saarroanuad'ang anfrasgragctaaree (B.) 'p'uer IT. Iun gflue eveng some or a?0 0f the Tfler g Bechaeeques have been nmplemenQ~~ and eonges$uoun has §te99 resu9ted at the postall adhich adverrse9y effects $raffifnc or sanrroaandung toevan unfrastrueture ghen VA wall9 eanp?emean~ the recomuunendatnoun§ of the Assessanent Connmittee or egs dlesegnee un g?ne fo99owuuag skn seasoun or Peak Pergodo ffeu add9tio9fl the fo19mwing successeve Quuauuageme¢nt technuryuees wel? be amplemenged. Ile Specna? events wul9 be aunoved uau paa-t f~om ghus pmu-ta? Bo dowun va99ey llocatuonse , • ~ ~ • . ~ ~ ~ • . . I: l.. 6' ~ c: ~.Q,~ 4~ " . ..F t . • 17 ` 1 .e..,.~_........ ~p. On~~. ~ l.. swwor. ~wr n.~~w V~ 4 . ~ I 9•~ ~7~ ~ D ''1, .a......a.,...~ . y ^ ` t jq. ~ i ` \ . . i ~ ~ • _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ • A R• ~ . o~~ ~ a b.:- t - ~ r ~ ~ ~w ~ 4,C~'; ~ • ' I . 8 av'•.v e . • ^ ,~'•Q E.3ST VILLAGE / ~ ~ ' w~on'moraw•.n~ ~ ~ . ' ' ~o.oa ~momw r.n~ E-- _ ' aow~voo ~ - •wamm.i.w....~ow. < ~ ' ~ 1 e~...o~en..v1m.. su..w.eoo..mm~m a 'a.am.i..w _ ~ oanw.naw r ' a ueawa-taw wm cauwmr . . /«orm~o'ruw~.,~ooam~Hr ~ . uur w:n.r ~ ~ F1guZ'@ . Un ilsil Streetscape Master I'lan . Page 92 • . ~ ~ 1 . . ' . I ~ i I ' f POTF-%TIAL YOItUI'iER P.aPKLNG 1{ % 3' GONCR£TE lY[? PAVCA / , . I s 91DEwAl1t w[TH CURB Yall TA+iLS _ . \ - EXISf1.VG 14.1NTF.R3 \IUVEO MCK ~ vOaULcEa a 4~ PEDESfHLaN EaE>IEN T REVCIHED LCISTINQ w'ALK VUVED 6.U'R PLtNTEHORTVOtOMP.aCT s 1 Pn1UItiG SPAf. FS / p{AZA nR !4ALL VANK ~ 1 F~• ~V S+' ('CHP Tn CCRB T ~?CH17F. PA.Y A'ITII '2 ^ 4 ' ASPfI%LT NU.aD .CHFACE• uS HONN . i +'.IV fU\fRE7E C\IT P.aVEK renESreI.iv' F'.\TII WITiI Cl'RB ~ F.\LTI~~: BIt11w1F. a\LF T0 Itt: WlUf:',Ei/ T ~ .~~'CU~lnfl.\TE PF.UEaTHi.U I'.\iM: ~ ~ ' GAaOEn Oi TwE GOO9 ~ / S TrvOl1 LOOGE . S J ` ru.NSOv R%.Nt-11 n, ~:w N:ucKrncen Ar E.VTRI' TO DISCUCII\t:F C?:?:!t'FS3ARY ~ . T(l\FFit' L . ~ x . PBUESTRIA.C Y:\Tfl !V~>'fl\L'F.: SOITII Tc) ' CO\\ElT TO E\I TI\G ,\S{'fl.{I.T REl'NEATION TR\II. • ~ 1 ' a ' VAIL VALLEY DRIVE DETAIL ` ' VAIL STREESCAPE N(aSTER PI_aK ' Town Of Yeil ~ . I ' i. . . . . " Figui, 19 Towk,~j' Vail Stmetscape Master Plan . Page 93 4i--- t 0 . a:. m - e~..~.~.. S' o~eioxr~oaus~ aMtrG 4~0 • Y1l ORmA00 fp~' o . V4iL oTNLEtIC \ CLJB I ~Y ~m .ieo. ~ Otr.4Q~~ W 1`. CPCQR N~J~1'4RR w ~ . . • ` \ ~ ~\V v ? , . • . ~ eaaw . a.rorw .ewa asa~oa uranuo HOtE 9/ LEGEND +md coom ro ~ ecco.oouv 1,~ ~ * \ ~ o~ m~aoao' J y~~ ~ \ 1 p \V ~~v n ~~ta•~ y~ o ~i°o w ~r4-xn .0O~'ov.~ ~ , vu~asrvKa e~d n,oa , m r~i~w'°~.eooa~i rao~ o-4 0 . 1 0 aaca om ao . . `a""° ( 9~ ,~1 rar~ aru r.e raw ~a. U V rX4 t \ ~ > ~ r vOIQLAIffER ~ n*a .ooa.c. m nne qo. c . .~a avc, m cscem+ w~o~. o~n.. "~O maarvc o'a'tovo- ro c3 R=%ecec a ~ . - ( mn~~mop~ wmus ~ ew m vAS vnu.uT oaq. 1 ~ O ~e0tab T. ^~J ~ {.J V ' ~ •'~CJravP OI.f1'P ' ~ ' W41 ~ " I ~ ~ ~ ~ N r ~ s / VdIL w~r!r0oA=C~qt 4l I TRAIL9 13 O q I^ 'I O q i \ 1' 1~ 1 1I . ~ \ `I~r00fuRw410020CRV^nQD • ~ • D ' ~f R 1 ~ ' \ \ \ \ • 1 ` \ ~ c DW~ AT _ ,1a GdL47iN Q ' ALIfER ~ ' c<ro~•c • ~ LODGE o.~o..a ~•ov..u. ~an rw- ~ 'p 0+1@•Y.1'~ r~Y1C@~,y, 1?i.~C1Rl~y1bT~.i \ fO~QOOY3~dll1lOMIO~~O~CO \ Z g11YM10@p g 61MOYi~-10 1`\ rao nrnw ra~~ 7p ~ 1 a wnrw comn_ coc R~: .a ~ ve mae.w o~vi i.+rt+ri ~ O \ , .wevmo ` s'E.•+~n••uns_ ~ ~ ~ `4 ~1 ~ e~rn~.uv "'~4a~tiYU~ Q}~O~b WLL `C l ~N r ~~-r-. ~ .l ; ~c :c.wnr rc s• . ~ onsm ~ ~ ~ o~a v.. ' ~ ~ r0.1 . LODGE ~awft~ - - ` r.nroe enMu. yC.tL '/AILEY DRIvE . , ~ ~ • C ~ C . ' • uw ' ~ - tV4~Il - C'~ ewe ewc~e . ~ ~ - w•.r.. IL9 eazn. ~Y~evw Of tle;] ~ / c°°°e""i . ~ ~ r~ ~ ti~r~ ~ w.~.o~ ` ~ 0~tltfd ( o+vn,.~d»~..,. ~2 H ~ / i " ~ ' ~ : ~ ~ " ' • " ia.w. m..w i ' :w = .ara'~` .~°we ~e e"'OO .emca ~ S ~ ~ cm^*r o~.¢ ro uRA ~g N~~ ~ con.en raWO~as.i caeac•~o..~•os~v- ~ ~a eeemw oe~w~wr~°menea J. LODCaE ~ R°w•~ ~ oa +.m rroms~. TMo' wave+e m'im-aevvp~sc,y~m• ~ ca.~m. ~a.o ro rco•vo.v m Otroatoeopo ^ Ik'dvoft Vl,.r I U^I ~ GOQr~O+4V~ CO1~C.~Ct. 00 f0 ~11 Wl4 CLG~ ~ 0Ri[ i ~ V A aa tOr O~PTOCY4 Cn+rti~Ci Nr0 QWtb ' f~w~rnt~1 tnw _ _ _ i ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ i ' ~H.rw•w ^ N , ~ ,T~, ~ rn 1' G•s~Y~.. ~ ~ F,`~.. ~t:~'~~/~ _ / .~L~1~ ' ~ ~ • ~ I, • - I / .c.<e •e • ~ ~ / / / i/ , 1 \ 41 ~ . / Pro /Vt • ~ ° _ . ~ ? ~!4 CW r~~1 . 7~0.~ ~ ~ I i1L'~. e.• ~°a ~ ~ ~ ' 8 ~°`~°4~L~+_e. / ~ ~ - - - - - , ~ ~ \ \ \ ` 1 . . • : . ~ ~ - ~ \ ~ - ~ ~ C r `ry ~ ~ -e/jS C~-~.'~~?~ ~~c~) 5~~I-P, -r ~ 1 WEST M1E.1D0W ORNF . . . . . . MIFRNAiF TRAI~Y%S+~~fM'A' . . . •t)i~m ~.mi...d 4++:tn. n u.e Maee d Ne ~^PRaQ d Ee aeeY cn~ n tlu ~e~. a~le nu~r vA~.WRJi~p~ynn nv~Arrin Jo~f Ee - ~ . ~ 4t aen w i~.w Ir bcn"v~ pm b~W~1' M+bM.~{ ~ trai . •ShW tr h~.qe0 ad <orKicd i~ . wuN cmict tlr CowM tlrt Coe G~ Pima~ude tv.* rM PerR .i.m. pedeu~w aea N tl~e ^~ypy Y4 P^P~~Y. . •Our io <t N x~r d tl~e Trt'~. . . watl 1~ey ~edc~ ~vq~~o~ m Te Coe hea b+h. U~ ~M'n~ ~vtl rq tr ~c~~b0 n„ uaJ nP~.w~a.~ f4. W.yM . 4~i ear..w'~i tl~JE Ee ~ed u ~ uGn npa:n~ pyR~ 4 ~le &~kp - Aui~ UJ J~akl Ml Ee m w~ tide d •k d< ro ' " l. ~ /~J _ O ~ ~ ~l~ , :t~~~~~w~? ' Reui~~q ..~6 ri tr ~aaded . / / . Y~NLNIG - - - - = y _ _ _ - i-~ >~'i ; ~ ~ , ~ ~ . ~ miuwm~vwwmaawu~muou 'uuuuiwummnwmm~~~~pp°~°16~~1°1°'°1°~"~nu o ~ ~l _ _ ~ ~ ~ ' : ~ ! - 4 , Y • ~rimyyqyu°'muuVawmmalYUUmI?nnm9 ~ moWON, eiupui~ t ~anln V~~1~ / ~ . 41.1 v! ~ `"~'''J ~~J~ ' ~ 1 ) ? ~ 1 39'•' ~ a' ~~Ir ~ ~ \ e o~°•4'9~ ~~i- / 1 ` - /.f ~ 'C~'' a 4~ .~i, ~ ~v"' ~ ~..\``-~\i `1 ~~~"i/'~ ~J~~~~~boa^9~ • . „ • ^ L~ c,E3 . e S ~ c v ~ ~ " - -"T~ ~ ~ ~ ' : . ~ ° ' ~ ~ y//,;_~i~ , C~, r1 ' ~ _ v ~-"~t~`"~' 1t~\~ ~A } \ ee ~ji~ ~v~~ i`' - 7-' J 7~~• •.~J.`t ~ . . =r v:?_• \ ~ j/ C J11'' 4 =_@~~ 'i~ ~ ~ "a` ' • ~ ~tuunm 1 l i . t~'' ~q-L,~9 • ` ~ / =j e11.~'`• ~~4 ' . . ~D~i~`~s~~L~s~ -\~`'K`~`a.~ --`=~t~_'__ ;J- , `~'`j~~;i `L~'• ~o~ I, oanvE..~ r ~~•.4`'~ ' .O ` ..'"'r' ~ ~..J».~+~-~ ~_r ~ _ , ;l' 'y~~~~^ ~ ~ t!.8 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~1~ ~ ~ i~ / - CORE AREA ~ ~L 6~~<dCltl~ . EEK PEDESTRWJ PA1H \ . • . .s_y WMA Peh' ~rn oiI Pv~ ~ ~ \ \ \ ~ ~ ~/f EXI$TV'1(i TRAIL$ OR $IOEWALX$ wm.iainim aKE PAIJES AMAU'1, c~J U LSUV° °r~QI1V ~ •co.a m~er , ~.-~~r a~ „a ~'.zr'. ~ oa.e1-. &KE/PEDESTRIAN LANES ON-STREET TRA1L C e. e e iTRNN ~ 1~' e4 cw a~u~ Mdye. Gw &uniA LLig 1!` , OFF-STTiEET TAAR X TAIL . ao+f e~.yr .d wao. Br.µe ~..e o..,u. - . ~~v. SIDEWALIC - ° • PEDE,STRIAN PATH S • • ~ • ~ L BRIOC.E BENCFIES ~ Figure 19 co f4OV 03 '95 10:47AM AMEP,ICAN MNP,KETING P.1 ALAN W. ~~SLOFF 1056 W. ssth street • Kams City, MO 64113 November 3, 1995 Town Council Planning ar1d Envarvrmental Comanittee Town of Vai1 75 South Frontage Road Va, CO $1657 ~ear Ladies aad Gent1emen: Iam the owaer of a condominium unit in VaBt Trails Chalet, and have been a part-time resideng of Vafl faP ~~~e dm 20 years. Because of the many rhanges in MY neighborhood, g understand that e' ' g the, bus stop across from the Vorlaufer is being considered. T'hat would cx~ate a serimus harrdship for all of the Yesidents in the area; not oraly the residents of Vail Trails C;halet, Vai1 T'ra.ls Fme, and the Four Season.s, but also those residents and visgtors Rwther c$st along the path to Ford Park, such as tha Wxen • Ap ents. Many families count on that bus stop tO travel into town and utilize the stares and restaurants. I be1ieve if peoplc had to wallk to the transpoatation cent~r they rrLight choose nat toA aad the impact on businesses in the vila~e wouId be, negative. Ibelieve tha$ the value af vur propertjr is cnhanced b'Y the prox=''ty of a bus stop. '%he eliminatioa of that stap could reduce the valuc of hornes axd condominiums an the area. I a1so urge that the oastbound stop at the C°ratl$ton . be rnaintained as we119 for a11 the reasons I previously ci4ed in geverse. Thanks fop your 6onsiderataon, and I hope you will vote to ffiaintain the exisring bus stops in my area. 5incere1y you8°s, 1 Cl~ , << AIan W. Kosla cc: Jim I,arno (via fax) ~ MEMORANDUM TO: TOWN COLJNCIL FROM: HOLLY MCCUTCHEON, TOWN CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 19, 1995 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL ELECTION JUDGES It is my pleasure to suggest the following four prospective appointees and one alternate as judges for the Special Election to be held Tuesday, January 30, 1996: Karen Morter 2985 Booth Creek Drive, P.O. Box 308 Vail, CO 81657 Mary Caster P.O. Box 1427 Vail, CO 81658 Jeannie Tilkmeier 5016 Main Gore Drive Vail, CO 81657 Holiday M. Cole . P.O. Box 741 Vail, CO 81658 Alternate: Pam Story 3230 Katsos Ranch Road Vail, CO 81657 I . _ p { MEmORAY@DUM . ~ l C ~ copy T0: Pianning and Environmental Commission , FROM:. Community Development Department DATE: iVovember 27, 1995 SUBJECT:. A request for a Condifional Use Permit to allowr for a"quasi-public club" in the Commerciat Core I Zone District to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors o# the Serrano's Building located at 298 Hansen Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village . 1 st Fifin9- . . Applicant: Margaretta B. Parks, represented by Glen Heelan Planner: Jim Curnutte 0. BAClCGRAUND AND DESCRIPTION OF TFIE RE@IJEST Glen Heelan, on behalf of Yhe building owner, has requested PEC approval of a Conditional Use Permit iiin order to construct a"quasi-public club" in the Commercial Core I(CCI) Zone DistricY, to be loca:1ed on the 3rd and 4fih floors of the recently approved new Serrano's Building,. located at 298 Hansen Ranch Road. The Town of Vail Municipal Code defines a quasi-public.use differenBJy from a use thaf is entirely private or public. For the PEC's information, the code defines these uses as follows: - Private - "Private" means a use, area, property or facility which is not public. (Ord. . 21(9994), § 5.) - Public - "Public" means a use, area, property or facility which: A. Is owned and operated by a governmental entity, and functions or is available for use by all persons whether with or without charge; or B. Is owned or operated by a person or entity other than a . governmental entity, and functions or is available for use by , all persons writhout charge. (Ord. 21(1994) § 6.) - Quasi-Public "Quasi-public" means a use vuhich is characterized by its availability to the public, with or without cost, but which is conducted by an entity, organization, or person which is not a governmental entity. (Ord. 21(1994) § 1.600.) A"quasi-public club" is not specifically IisYed as a permitted or conditional use in the CCI Zone ,DistricY. Near the end of tG~te list of conditional uses, however, is a statement which a((ows for . addition. al uses..de.terminefl..Yn.be. similar to. the..permitted. and.conditional uses described above." Staff has determined that the proposed quasi-public club is "similar" to two of the eating and drinking: establishments listed as conditional uses (above the 2nd floor) in the CCI Zone District. These uses are "cocktail Imunges and bars" and "restaurants." Since staff has determined that these us;es are similar to the proposed quasi-public club, the applicant has proceeded to apply for a Comditional Use Perm6$. Additionally, staff will use these categories in order to determine the partdng requirement fioir the club. f:\every=ne\pec\mamos\serranos.n27 ~ , ~ ~e p~„~,~n more detail in Section II (Background) of this memo, the ProJ'ect developer, Glen yqn&eTe"lan, recenUy received PEC approval (March 13,1995) to. demolish the existing Serrano's Building and reptace it with a new structure. The approved uses on the 3rd floor of the new building include two offices and a portion of a residential condominium. The remainder of the condorninium would be located on the fourth floor of the building. The new concept is to use the 3rd and 4th floors exclusively for a quasi-public club. The club owners will be offering their members not only the traditional ski storage (in the basement), but also areas of comfort and relaxation together with an array of services. The applicant has indicated that club members would have the ability to ski down to the base of the mountain, give their skiis to the ski valet, and enter the club. Here they would have the luxury of taking off their boots, sitting down by the fireplace in a quiet atmosphere to relax in the comfort of their "mountain living room." They might enjoy the refreshment of their choice, make a couple of phone calls, check the stock market, send a fax, hold a meeting or host a dinner party for their family, friends, or business associates. It is anticipated that the 3rd floor of the building would be used for: _ A. Personal lockers, steam room and showers (similar to a private golf club where bags are stored elsewhere); B. Office space for building and club operations; . C. Lounge area where members could have a drink, make a call, send a fax; and D. Up to three meeting and/or dining rooms. The 4th floor is anticipated to be the "living room on the mountain." This is an area where members could sit by the fire and relax, meet with friends and family, have an appetizer and a - drink. This Conditiona! Use Permit request does not involve -any exterior changes to the previousl}r approved building. The or'rginal approval of the Serrano's redevelopment included a restaurant and a"private club" on the 2nd floor of the building. The applicant has indicated that that portion of the 2nd floor currently labeled as private club, will be used as additional dining for the 2nd floor restaurant. Since this entire area was calculated as a restaurant for parking purposes, there will be no additional impacts associated with the proposed change in use. II. 113e4CKGROUND On March 13, 1995, Glen Heelan, the project developer, received PEC approval to demolish the existing Serrano's Building and replace it with a new structure. (Please see attachment #1, site plan, elevation drawings and floor plans of the approved building). The building program included: Commercial uses..andea.potential nightclub._in the basement. • Retail uses on the 1 st floor. Restaurant uses on the 2nd floor. • Two offices and a portion of a condominium on the 3rd floor. • The remainder of the condominium on the 4th floor. ~ f:\everyone\pec\memos\serranos.n27 2 In adcfiljon to these uses, walkway and landscape improvernents on the north, east and south sides of the building vuere approved, as well as a 2nd floor outdoor dining deck over the Hansen Rancta Road right-of-way. To accomplish the above described proposal, a CCI Major Exterior Alteration and the following variances uxere required: . 1. A setback variance for an 11-foot encroachment into the 30-foot stream setback for Mill Creek (for the basement floor only); 2.. A variance for common area of 78.9% (35% is allowed by zoning). Also, the following tnro conditional use permits were required: 9. An outdoor dining deck on the second floor; and 2. Office space on the third floor. The project was reviewed and ultimately approved by the Vail Town Council and the Design Review Board in the Spring of 1995. ,4lthough the applicant had intended to demolish the existing structure and begin construction of the newr building in the spring of 1995, he was not able to adhere to Yhat schedule and demolition/construction has been delayed until the spring of 1996. In the meantime, the applicant has reconsidered the previously approved uses of the 3rd and 4th floors of the . building. • On October 9, 1995, a worksession was held with the PEC to discuss this Conditional Use Permit requesY. At thaY time, the applicant had intended to have the club be a"private" club. The PEC was not receptive to the idea of a private club in the Village and the negative precedent that may se$ and directed the applicant to explore other options. In response to that direction, the applicant has amended the intended operations of the club so that the club would now be open to the pa,blic (see attachment #2 for floor plans of the club). The applicant has indicated that the public would be able to avail themselves of a number of options related to club services. For example, the public could rent ski lockers in the club on a seasonal basis, pay a daily, weekly or monthly access fee to use all, or a portion of, the club amenities, or pay a full membership fee and accompanying annual dues. The applicant has also pointed out that the liquor license , associated with this club avill be the sarne as those granted to public restaurants and will not be a private riquor license. . On November 13, 1995, the PEC tabled this application anc9 requested that the Town Attorney provide a written opinion on the applicanY's right_to apply for the requested Conditional Use Permit. See attached copy ofi the Towra Attorney's response to the PEC request. W. CR9TERIA TO BE V9SE~ 1~9 EVALVJATING TFIIS PROPOSAL Upon review of Sec4ion 18.60 - Conditional Use Permits, the Community Development . Departrnen4 recommends approda0 of the conditional use permiY based upon the following factors: f:\everyone\pec\memos\serranos.n27 3 A. Consideration af Factors: 1. Relationship and irnpact of the use on the development objectives of ttre Town. Staff's Res onse - Staff is in support of the proposed use of the 3rd and 4th fioors of the Serrano's Building as a quasi-public club. It would appear that the club has the potential to provide more activity and interest in the . Valage than would be provided by one residential dwelling unit and two office spaces. . Additionally, staff believes that the proposed Conditiona! Use Permit request would serve to carry out the fotlowing goals, policies and objectives of the Vail Village Master Plan: 24 Objective: Encourage the development of a variety of a new . commercial activity where compatible with existing land uses. ~ 2A.1 Policy: Commercial in-fill development consistent with established horizontal zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provide activity generators, _ accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and • streetscape improvements to the pedestrian network throughout the Village. 7-4.2 Policy: Activity that provides night life and evening entertainment for both the guests and the community shall be encouraged. 2:5 Objective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovatiori and . maintenance of existing lodging and commercial _ facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. . IrT #he CCI Zone District, "meeting rooms" may be approved, as a Conditional Use, only in the basement or garden level and on the 2nd level of'a building. They are not allowed, as a permitted or conditional use, on . the 1 st floor or street level or any level of a building above the 2nd floor. Since the applicanYs request includes the proposed use of a portion of the 3rd floor for meeting and/or dining rooms, staff was concerned with aulborizing a use which is specifically prohibited on this level of a building in the CCI Zone District. The applicant has responded to staff's concern by committing that the.meeting rooms will be used solely by club rnp-mbers, and therefore, can be considered.as accessory to the functions ot the quasi-public club. The club members, as a group, will not rent the. rooms to the general public. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, . tramsporta4ion facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilBties needs. f:\everyone\pec\memos\sersanos.n27 . 4 ff , ' a SYaff Response - Staff believes that the proposed change in use from residential and office use Yo a quasi-public club wiil have no negative effect ora any of the above listed criteria. 3e Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestions automo4ide pedestrian safety and convenience, trafific flow and control, access, enaneuverability, anc6. remova8 of srtow frorn the street and pae-king areas. SYadf Res nse - Staff believes Yhat the proposed change in use from residential and office use to a quasi-public club uvill have no negative effect ora any of the above listed criteria. ~ EffecY upon the character of the area on aNhich the proposed use is to be flocated, incBuding the sca9e and bulk of the proposed aase an relation to surrrounci6ng usese Sta#f Res onse - As mentioned previously, there will be no external ' changes made in conjunction with this proposed change in approved uses. of the 3rd and 4th floors of the Serrano's Building. Therefore, there will be no changes in the scale and bulk of the building previously reviewed and approved by the PEC, Town Council and Design Review Board. 1Nith regard to the change in use and its effect on the character of the area, staff believes that the proposed change from one large residential coridominium unit and tvvo small office spaces, to a quasi-public club, cotgd have the effect of providing more activity and therefore a livelier fieel to tihe Village, which is a goal of the Tovvn. B. Fk irt The Planwiflg and Environmental Commission shalB make the following findin,.gs be9ore g nting a conditional use p-ermit: 1. 'fhW the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the d'asffiict in which the site is located. 2. Tta# the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it ,would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public . hea3th, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or irnprovements in the vicinity. 3. Thai the proposed_ use would comply with each of the applicab?e . pardisions.of She condiiional. use per.mit.section of. the zoning code. C. AdcliYional Crigeria tor consideration of Conditional l?se Permit aqmlications in the CCO Zone Districft In addition to the standard Conditional Use Permit Criteria and Findings listed in f:\everyone\pec\mmmos\serganos.n27 5 'e paragraphs A and B above, applications for a Conditional Use Permit within the CC I Zone District must address the following additional development factors: 1. Effects of vehicular traffic on Commercial Core I District; Staff ResAOnse - The proposed change of approved uses on the 3rd and . 4th floors of the Serrano's Building, from a dwelling unit and office space to a quasi-public club, would not appear to have a negative effect on velhicular traffic in the CC I Zone District. The loading and delivery traffic - associated with -the club will be accommodated by the same loading and deEvery vehicles associated with the restaurant already approved on the second level of the building and should not result in additional traffic impacts. 2. _ Reduction of vehicular traffic in Commercial Core 1 District; ~aff Response - The proposed change in use would not appear to cause a reduction, or increase, in vehicular traffic in the CCI Zone District. ' 3. Reduction of nonessential off-street parking; • %aff Response - The proposed change in use would not reduce, or irxrease non-essential off-street parking. There is currently no off-street parking associated with this property. 4. Qontrol of delivery, pick-up and service vehicles; Staff Res~ponse - As mentioned in staff's response to criteria #1 above, sta#f believes that there will be no increase in the number of delivery, pick- up ar service vehicles associated with the proposed club. The food and beverage elements associated with the club appear to be ruinimal and can be accommodated through the deliveries that would aAmady occur in relation to the restaurant on the 2nd level. _ 5. 0?evelopment of pubtic spaces for use by pedestrians; Staff Response - The proposed quasi-public club will have no effect, positive or negative, on public spaces for use by pedestrians. , 6. C.cntinuance of the various commercial, residential, and pubtic uses in GaNmmercial Core I District so as to maintain the existing character of the ar€a; Staff Res onse - Staff believes that the proposed quasi-public club use - ---wcaiId continue the- various commercial andpublic uses in the CC I Zone . District. Approval of the club would displace the previously approved dwelling unit from the property, however, since the Serrano's Building . does not currently have a dwelling unit in it, (only an approval for one large ccandominium to be built), the proposed club will not change the xi 'n character of the area. In staff's opinion, the replacement of the approved ccndominium unit with a club is a positive change, as it would appear to . . oftr the opportuniry to provide a more active and lively feel to the Village, arrd to provide additional services and amenities for the Towrn's guests. f:\everyone\pec\memos\ser:anos.n27 6 e Q . 7. Control quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape design in Commercial Core 9 District so as to maintain the existing character of the area; Staff Response - The applicant has stated that no exterior changes will be made to the building in association with the proposed club. Staff was corucerned however, that depending on the scope of the food service element of the private club, it may be necessary to add additional mechanical equipment related to any new or expanded kitchen area. In response to this concern, the applicant has assured staff that all food preparation activities associated with the club will be handled in the kitchen of the restaurant, located on the 2nd floor of the building. 8. Efifects of noise, odor, dust, smoke, and other factors on the environment of Commercial Core I District. Staff Res ans - Staff believes that none of the elements listed above will be a concern related to the proposed club use of the 3rd and 4th floor, with the possible exception of noise. This issue was a concern during the initial discussion of the building's redevelopment, related to the possible bar use in the building. The solution to that discussion was fhat noise levels will be adequately addressed through the Touvn's existing noise ordinances, and staff beiieves those measures are appropriate for the proposed club as well. 8V. STAFF RE~OAIINi~~~ATBON Upon review of the Criteria and Findings outlined for review of Conditional Use Permit applications in the CCI Zone DisVicY, staff recomrriends approval of the applicant's request for a quas6-publac club oaa the 3rd and 4th lee?els of the Serrano's Building. Staff recommends that the following conditions be attached to the conditional use permit approval of the club: As mentioned previously, the original approvaf of the Serrano's redevelopment applicafion included a Conditional Use. Permit for two office spaces on the 3rd floor. VVith the club's Conditional Use Permit application, the only office use occurring on the 3rd or 4th fioors will be offices used by employees and staff for `Ybuilding and club operafions.° Tlhe applicant has stated that this office space will not be rented 40 outside piarties. The staff recommends that since the office Conditional Use PermiY granted in the spring ofi 1995 is no longer necessary, it shall be considered null and void upon the approval of the new "Club" Conditional Use Permit. 2• Once final floor plan drawings are provided for staff review, a parking analysis will be- performed-in order-to detemnine if-there is an- incremental parking demand associated duith the proposed quasi-public club, as compared to the previously approved commercial office and residential uses on the 3rd and 4th levefs of the building. Upon compleYion ofi the parking analysis, a parking pay-in-lieu fee may be determined. This fee must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project. Please note thaL under Section 18.60.080 (Permit Approval and Effect) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code9 the approval shall lapse ifi construction is not commenced within two years of the date of issuance and diligently pursued until completion, or if the use for which the permit is grantedl is not commenced within two years. f : \everyone\pec\tmemos\senanos . n13 7 • , ' twwl a~nf • ' : . / ~ ' ~ • „ .t..,e.. ' / ( . • . ? i ~ i ~ ~ ;~y . I I I ~ f M~lMtORtMMb ' I ~ . 4. ~ . GOn.iQ?IErs Fcnr, u~~RIM ,b~'~~~ ~~:~ai. ~ ° ~ P_I ~:i~T~i~~VATION _ `l . • ,s . . Gllb'•O' (NAtl:G1 NY1G1 F~O~1 ' ' ~ . . . ~ • I. ' ' ' ~ au.u~dr ~ ~ • ' • • . , . ~ rf . ~ ~ • ~ WaNyy 1_ 1 ~~b~MY~wa'M ~ . ~ ~ p,...~~.~ ' I / :a. . . I ' I --~rr;~~r ...__.._.J 4 , e~ 1 ~ ' . ~ ¦7rY~ ~p b WoYAR . ' • ' Avl nUV~ li+?+u+t Mb ~ ~ a~ sumpm ~~ws at vn trNa • ua a da u~w t 1 , o~,.Mww~e 'F ~ ' .www. I ~ ~ • ~"''i ~ qµ?wi ' 1~~ ~ i~c.sai.a.a..ro ' 'nnr.r~ne~~ ~ ~ e~sdx ~z. • I . ;`t~Dm~.w•Yw[~ ' . I%f xwau'wl ' ' Krawv? I ~~j/~ ow~M 1 . , ' , ' . N ~bMM ' ? • / uoa~.ue a sawe~ • twsr.onn ' i I~~, ~ 1 , ~ ' • • : [W/.1'M~[l S ? ~ ?r t~' . HY1 ' ~ • . . w~s~owm . i • . • I ~~I(, ' • , ' . . oa~ s~rwr~ Y • , , • • . UI ' 'i~ ~ ' ' ' . ~ ~ owan.~•w~ct~ ~ ' ~ R~ ~ ~ ~ • ' ~ SE~3~3~11~J0I~ (CAr477[I`JA ae~~~m ~ , • ~ y~ ~....o ,~UNQ~ir m+~ a,Nw• • ; ~ ~ • . • aw.w ~ ~,~'1 I r FI ~~VE_ ~L VATION I~~ tii ~ n• . oni.u~vw 0116'•D' (1W45GN RtJiCN Fu0AD/ IOMVa ' . ~ ~I ~I ' • 1~/1' G.OfS16Mn(YATGM NtD'd . !00'4' ~ • ~ ~~q ~ Q~ I'l1I'I 1 I~Y~CIL IINNIMWI NO~A.?UIIS I Fii .,1 ~ ~ql 1~14~ sire eoveW,s - :e-M sF. C4q &I. c% 7~ ~M UL~ ~/~~1 1 ( ~ ,~~IM~IMt ~ ~ ~r.~ (I,~~~~ ~ ' ~ (I~II 11 ~ ~ (1 . • . V :TIYR . ~ , .iihji,~ I---~- - ~ S~ •j~pf f~ • ~ ;ii;~i ~ 4~ ~~~t,4~ 4 ~rf ~ • , `4 ~``4¢4r n , j . ~ y ' . ~ \ • ~ I . ii./~ii~ . ~~.~.-11V-.y ~J~~,- ---!.1''-.~ h , ~ , ~ ~ z~./ ~ 4vft1 J ?N~r f • . I~+M W Iq ' ~ ~www~uw.v.w ' t~~t 1~ • • . - TIUS UM WJ4I h MSlD ~ - ON 'HTtR+iIRITNN D1611tERI6' ( lra s~~y T~L MAP W4~FD, l~ ' ~ ' • ~ / . . j/%/./~ wr M,iG, ot.or,~ 7, v~ I~ ~ ~ • . . ~ ~ \vIUA6e.r~lNOao. l aAaeGt I • / . ~ W, q MOy, OAIE 591,EDo U•IMI. . ~ • , j//'/.~~~~% j % . • / • • ii~iii~ i~! !iiii~!~~ ~ 'J'.` ~.-I~ ' j ~ 1 ' '1'p . . . . . ~ . icuc a ,ea.e v 0 . ~e ' ~ ~ 0179 ~I ~ I . . • • tll~ r i~ H pi Tr Tm1r • ' ~:;v. :4• , ~ ' ' ~ll~~ LI"11.e~~ . 1 • . . ~ • . • , . . • . . . • . . . . ~e . ~ 4 + • , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ A I . . I . • • . . ' ' . ~ , . . , • . ~ nw~n~..,,e, J . : , asm.~~aw ~ . ~ ' . , a`walaooam ~ FLODRARFALAILllAT107~~ . ~ , • ~~w~a ~ 1 . ' . svN~W~wusL 11~~a eMd . . ~ ' ' • ' LL+n~ nasi a~ w»aa . ~ W:U~M 1.1+~6 ~fp y~A -D:J01 5-~V~y~ 10lft I1v11. ?M! 601. e ' . ' f[UUIP~ 4!M 5~710P. TdOOP. . . o :y.~ I •'i ~f~ ~ ' . . . °nar~ML fONSr. m y R099v: aA9P; ' . ' ?awm !'8 ~ • ' ' ' ~ 1~i6 9P 9Y 9 bP ' ~r' o ~ i F~ ~ ~ i ~ YJ ~ it 3F~i1.Fb dP""$9k~3~ ' . iI I ~ . • ~'1,~ ' , . , • , , ~ ' .r• . 'ti'•,, ~Cil ~ ~ a, . , . • , . • , . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • aaro I~ ' ~ , , .q . , ~ , • ~ e•~ ' euw ~ 6l~ r • ' p . . IJIeL7/ ~.ST• ~ ~j~ • ~ ' ' . „ . \ ~ ~ ~ 1 • . I ~ ~e ' . . . . . ~ . ' ` ` . o . . DaDLAIMe` p • . :.~•~a~:;i~ ~ , . ,r: ~:,:.a'iri•ta, . ' , • tl • • ' :,;t:~ . . . • ~ 1' . ~ ' ~ . 1.;:'. ~ . . . ~ ~ i • . ' „ " We~iw~ ~1 . • ~ • , E~ o' wu,o ww vea 0.v~a ~w n9e ' , ~ . , ~ i. /FRMIIYKG~ . . , ~ . ~ • I • _ " • . ~ ~ . • ' ~ . . . . i i . . . . . ; ~ , o I i . ' ' ~ , . . ' ~ ~ o~.~ o ~'l LC~ckFaa • Q~~ ~ ' 3U ~ . • . ~ ia ~ ~ ~ . . ~ aean Aav, e gv av. ' ainM aWaoaaov. • . ~ . . ~ y ~ ^ ~ f_vc.i / a • . ' ~ \ • \ 1 . , ~ ~ ~ • " MMl p1 qaai ~ • ~ ~ ~ : , . ~ ~ ' i~ ' < /s ~ , • ~ o 0^~ioG~qowo6~SZ-aoo oa~aemaoomoac~poesa• •oCeoeamsoootr aacr~oeam~~ar,eet~moo~yydao oeemesa+meemoaCC ~ ~ , _ ~ • ~ YO AR/N ¢QrdMK lP~ r ' ~y_ . . 'V~~ . . . ~ . y. ' ~ • • ' ~ . ~ • . . CJIAPMC gW M1 • . y - . ~.i. , ~ ' ''t"~- ' 1 . . . i --...--........~wnnrn+3 . . , ~ • RWNIII IYKy ~fAL~. K~l Sf~nOes ?g~~ ; • . • ~ ?wt ln~l 8ea ~r. !u~ ar. xo e~. • swSi ~fs/. 7ry, I.1~~,. I ' ' ~ ~u~l/. N~y1/1. ' . . . • ~ • ~ f 1 ~ 'i.~,..' . , I . . . 101 ~ ` ~I~IZ~a~ M I~.N~R~ . • ~ i ` ~ r • ~ ~ 4: ~ . . R . . . 'j '~In~}~ ~,.I ,r,,~ . • , ' r,%, • ; ' • : .~Lw. ; . : : . . • . ~f.•~ • f ~ ' ~ , ji • ~ ~ • ~ .K' i}i I ~ . ~A; • ~ • ~ , 1 1. ~ i ~ ~ . . .,..1 , , . . . . . . ~ v ,~:d:p • . 91I9 • . : ~ . . w ' . . ' ? • • , ~ • ~ • ~ YE~tL - ~000Y ~ . . ,y.~.;:. • . . ~ . : . • • ' dh e ta~ ! . O . ' ~ + . . ~ . ' ' ' ' . • • `M 4~K;~;....: .{J:., ~ . , ' • • . . . j7, l . '~:~rRt~; ~ .S''''~~;K ~~IM . y , , ~ ~ . ~ i~ ~ ~rr ~ j ~ I ~ •~~•A•~ N~t~l ~ ' ~ ' ~ •I' 1~ „ ~M ~ ~ I.~ . ~ ' . . . ~ a . , . r. . / '~.i!/. . ~ ~Stt'' ~ ~ . , .I ~ . ii. . O ~ ~ ' • ~ ~ ~ • ~ • . ~ .'r: I rs~, . ~ . !.`a.iLf~L gPA~~} . . , I° . . ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ' 5 " e ~ . . Itl IIaW NfA• UJI ~f. ~ rr~ , . •.a I . 1,.~ . 1 k. t ~~i ~r.,, , • . ~ ' • ~ ' , . . , ~y ~ ~ I ~ . , ' ' • • ~ Cs~ 1 • . . ~ ~ i . . . . ~ . . . . , CcZCT/~ IL 6t9A~ \ • . ~ ' . in~'wnw...o,,, ~ ~ • . ~ . /.0 • . \ ~ . . I I ~ , ~ : / ' ~ \I • . ' . 1~ < t\`` ~ • i~wi~inT " • , ' • ~ ~ . ' ' ~ .w~+~ • /`/O : fONLtwet I . ' . \ ~ ~ Yrr~cKlMl I' , • , . '''~j'/ • . ' ~ .'t ~y'•' • ~.,1'~'•!', •:i:~. ~ , ~ , ~ , . ca~nac scn.t . . . ~ ~~1N . iLll!~lll I , . . I'•'• ~~uU~ 11 . Rll:dV llelU i!' il.e TiI~ ~1T "°"`•»•'~•°•D•« . ~ • . • Y o . 0 1.' . , • • . • , ^ ~ ~ . . I. • • 1 ' ' rtooa ~wu cns.utnn~y ~ ~ • . . ?+w~ ~r _ • ~ p 14 ~4 , ~ • . • , e ~ 9ew ev ~ 7~0 P • vo OP. q~ ~ • ~ ~°j~,~', ' ~ • ' ~ p"~'R'~iva _o~u4,av~. wr~wer.,~~~ . . • ° ~ ~ ~.I!II:~h • ~ ' . . , . • ' i' n~' o ~i tiJa6 : . ' . . . ~ ' ~ ~9 S7' ~ t , lLeod ~~0„pO ~ ~ t• i, ~ . . • ~ . . . p 6. ~ ~ . . ~ . /r • ~ ~ ~ 6~si . Q d 1 . . ~ .u R ~ SY/II • ~ ~ YL•ST• ° An PA . • t,'~'~ . • j , t, . ~ ,.o ;.r . N..r. , . ' ~t' . , . ~ ( . . . . . • ',;~•~ti~'i ~ ' • , • ~ • , t: v '•~'p•r.'f~,l~~ j. . • • ; . • . ' _ ' l~I.• , ' ' ' ' . 1 . ~ , • • • ~ ~ • . • • -:i. i , : . . . , , ' ' 1~ ~ ~ Al` ~ I ' rN xanarouov.~ • ~ . ( ~ ~ o • ~ j 1•1 ~ • ' ~ ~ ' ~ nu~art~~ ~ ~ P~IST4elat4CMM9/01QeY1~J 1 , . . ~ . • g1i~1~c.N ~~,~sa~ ~ 1 . ~ . . . . . .I . ` • . D"40 oo ~ ~ • . , . . . ' ~ ~ . / ' • ~ ` _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ cae maea ~ , • = = ~ . ' . ma.- - -~_s.- - - ~ t~cao~t ~ 1.4 ' . , • ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `•.,,i-cw =*m crw4x "a ~ , . . . . , . . • • , . • ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ • - Q:ORD ]LIE . . . ~~ola - . ~ • . ~ i . . . . ; . . . ~ . ~ . . ~ . . . . ~ . . . , . . . . ~ ' ?t~ ~ c+uuuraus . e.x ~ APIA wi aoe.~ru I a.'. . ; • rru~~~~u'ie~nM tr.1i aNr,G ues s~. ` . • . ; , ' • OEEI S/. O~B 100 !I, sr. I ~~~'1!~~•4~ ' ~ Il.~`~ ~'4~~ / . ' ~ ~ LLNL Ee11V.~ 9D~{/.~. ~?I~ ' . ~ I ~'..s . , 'I 1,'1' ~ :i. I • . , 1 ~ I w~~II/T-rl'R7N IJIIT/~.1 1' ~ ~1 ~ . ,i.. ~ ~ . ' • 1 1 . . . ' , . • • . ~ . . i. . ' " ' ' 1 . . . . . • .j , ~ ~ 1 1 1 ` 1 . • . • I ~ ~~n~rw.,`~ .~~c~.~ r - ~f . . • . ~ . _ . . ~ . . • • ~ I ' l' -~~GL 1 I}1V- ~ • ' . ' . • ~ I' V Ii d49tl.'~~ ~ 1 Mv-/G~1~t$ , • ~ I' ~ te. ~i I . . , .i ia`..'' .1 . ' ewb~~.. '.l'il~~ i.. (~ri~~~ .~1: ~ .Iil l • '.1. ~ j ~ . ~ ~ ' . ' . r r ; ~,•I,r:?rr~ r~~~i~ ~ ' ~ a ~~r ~ rr r 1 ? r i r.r' r.~ ~ ~ . ' ~ . ' ~ f t~ . t . ~ ~ • " • L~••. . . ~ . .I~ ~ . ' . ' • 1.• • . ~ I . ~ . . ' ' , . . • . . . ' ~ • ~I • ' ' I ' 1 " • • ~ r\. WA. )2~0 . I. -c I ` r • ~ i i , - o- - . • . . ~ ~ 4 . 1. e . I 1 = ~a r ; • ' ~ ~ ~ . . ~ , • , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e~mrw, ` • e~+- i~. . ~~~~~..~.~°1~..~~~ ~ fr~'~L • _ / M • I... ' 1 ~ ' 1 , r~~ ~ ~ , , •.0~. ' I ~`~p~N1e[q~dt{l~ ~//I ~ 1 • , ~ . ~~1 • . / 1• 1 . ' ' •''':f`~!: ~ ~'i . , - . ''.%:ii.~~. ~ ~~~~i ' • '~LLll~~ .ri e V 11U~ . rnr, xuu ~lU r .i• ~ . • °r . 1!' 11.eOOIN !I-LAN. ',.~:-ti:.,. . . , , ; - ' ; ' ~ • ' ' . • ' ~ , ' . ~ . ~ • . 4. . , 1 ' . ve , . ':..y., • li6 . VLOOSt /UtPA CAL[iQA7E0PH . . : nH hA7y pqP'Jg ' ' • lMl R.al NSA Wy togton • . . ' i ! • • . ~ _ Ml001t ~yqy a!]D SP B[1o . • . . 7u6t 1lvP9. 9em 6P. 16P. 1709 OP, ' ~gpp0~ 3+21 9P. LO UP• . • • i ' : . . j 1l.~ • 06ro 9/. „fe 6p . 9pTm 8G. ' ~ • ull ~tW ML Duq 6I. Wa Sv. g y~ . . . . IWtIn1A4L Im SP IA04V ' y ~ !1,1°ei~' ,i:• ~ . 1 I "_'Im~7eF-4i~n3'-~fjJ~' . ...,.'s~~~.d • :y':~ , ' 't~ • _ .~`3 ` ' . 1 , ' , , ~ ~ . : • ~.r ;~..:.a; 'n;•~ , ' ~ , . ~ . ~ • ' , :r ' • osp Cti ELE . ~ ~ ' ,I • ' ~ I ~ 1 ~ ' . omc: : ;9,,, • ~ a~, ~ 1-~ , ~ `~-f e.e.., ° e ~ e o ' e a :e..e ~1 ~ n ' . a• ~ ~ • ~ y.~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ' • 't;: . ' : . • \ ' . ~ ( . ~ ' I 1 _s` , . . . . ,;;`~i~. ~ f~~ ~w.on ~1 . . . • . F~ ~ ' I~ . ~ ~ I~I~;j.' • . . ~ 1P. I ^ , 1 - : • ~.e p~ , ir,~~ i ~ I ' I • . . • -Or ~ • ~ \ ~ _ ~ o . . , ~ i~•~•~ . ~ ~ ' ` I~ ~ ~,=P°' ~E ?~aR~6 • , • I ' ' ~ ~ ~ ` . . . ~tl ~ , . , J ( I , • ~ 1 - ~ r > . . / ~.,Da eLm ~ / ~ r ~ -n I 4 ' '~,C_ e ~ 1 ' ~ ~ ~ aam v~an 1 l ..CW_°nm__ catc¢weap ~Q • . . I ~ . I 1 ~1. ~ e.. , . . : e. . , . . ~ . . ~ . . • roapmr ¢rd r . . . . . !I° O~JlN 11 dill llelEV 11d116 MOOR )PIIdL~111\I • 'i;r~:, . . . ~ : . . ' • ' . . . ~ . ~ n . . . . . , . i . , , . ~ . . . . i ~ ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ , . ~ . . ~ , . ~ . i • • , ~ . ~ . • ~ ~ . • . • . . . . , . . . . . ' • • . . , . '?wWU'! CNIrtU f ldMl T~lc IqhC . . . . . . ~ ' ~f: . . ~ I . • . . . . . ~u+~oe ~nrn O ~ . . . I . • • . ui.-r • ~ ~ ~1~~~ n~r~~~~'r ~i iu~A~ ~1) ~ u/y` ~h~~~l{~w1~ 1~'~'~~~ M I 1~ i 1 • ~ ~ ~ , ui~~~ ~'Yt?AYN ~ n I~III I~ . w,vI ^e.A _-~III~~~ ~I) ~ll~ ~l~ 1~ . • • • pvme ,ewn^ , ^_~~•p•v .~..~.i ~ _ _ _ ~ III~ _ f. ~.`a. . . "~1N'?vV • •'h•'•t~,';•r~~~ , V=7-~ ~ • ~V~ ~ • . ip Ar • • . . • ^ ~ :.4;' '~,~;~~..:~'.~Mi~~~~i; ~•~.i.:, ~y^ ~ . u1.1' ; •.l . ~ N11~.1afJ0 t41 . ~ • .1 ' i~'. ~ ~ _ ~ I . SOA[O , _ ' _ ' .•t'•,1 . , ' \ rnmiwconwor • ~ ~ I ~v~w~ M. - _ I . IIIII I ~ . td~T~N1~6 ~ ~ s nin ~-r: - ' l1i Ir I. ' - 2 1 - IT : , U IY6!- n~. . . ~ , 41i . . , . . I . ; ~ • . - • ' MOOII~NA1 q1 ~ ~rl~ ?~~~m Mt . . . ,vyl ' ~OOO fM1~1 wtl • [~A1~1 M~10 ~ W! Wll ~llMlq ~ . • . . . , . . ` YOIR /1 L11 IC, ILIlOVa LIPilOa Y~ - . • • ~ • ~ . ' ' . ' , ~ • . , . y _ . ' • . . ' . o • . • ' . ;.I,. t . . ' ~ • . , •.:~~:.3::~`~ . . . , ~t: , . • . • • • ' . . f . ,~•..t1; . , . ~ . ~ . . . • • , , ~ ~ . , ~ . ~ . ' ; ~ , • • ~ . • . . . ~ ~ ' ; , , . . . . . • . . • . ! . ~ • . ' ' , ' , ~ • . i ' ' ",u•~ . ' , . ' o • % , ~ II0111 t IIII01 ~0,90 a_e112 ua . . ~ 4~1~1 • . . . . ;n.,. . ? I?~I ~ o ~ ' . ' : '.:;'.:;r', `.:+r' ~ ~ . . . .i;p~ . . 'I . . • . oew,~...a~? , ' . . ~ - _ tI) • . ~ . ~ . _ _ • - _ ~ • . ~ ~ - - : ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . QBS~QxI i~lOLfl~~ - ~ . J ~ o~, o • . - ' (~I - - ~ ~b ' IIIIII~II I I ~II~ . ~ "vreiv~~t • _ _ - _ . oaese o.m ~ ` ,,,t-_ , a }r -IT . • ~ ' , • ' 116a]1~~ lLl/Ldlld V 6 ]l~~~d V • . . • . . • ~ . ~ . . . ~ • • ~ ' ~ . . ' . . ~ sau~, rr.« Ktr,~ ~ ; _,uw.» uwn,u~ ~ ' ' . . . . . ~ ~•_i • ' . . ~ . ' . ~ , ` - ' . , I . • . . . . . • . • i . ~ ~ , ..L~ , • . , ' . • , ~ . ~ ~ . ' , • ~ • • • ~ . ~ ~~~~~5`iM~tMil~~~~~~ ~,,1~~~) P~ y~ y~,~~~~.ll • ~~.jr~~ . ~ ~4 1 • ' ''1 M l , • ' . . ..1+ iry~:l' y~.~.• f[~~ ~ ~ _ T ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . • . rjYyf ~ ~ . . _ • ' ' _ ~ , ' . . . . . . • • . ~ ~ • ' ~ ~ . , :.ti:. Illf ~I • - . ( • • n . . ~ I ~ I Ifl!(I I r=?; , ~ .r:~:;,.ir~ ~ -:.-r.-r-- .,;...~.,.r~;. e,: y , 11~6 _ ` ~-W~4 ~ • I1lIII ' L~,n. ~a°•n"'°"`M • \ ~ - - - ' _ _ ~ . • ~ -~-.-G-:..~ - . , • ' Y' , ' • - n+e in,t ~ - _ - ~ l ~ ' - - ~ ~ ~ 1- - ~ - IU1:~t~ l~lol~l~ D~l~(a_ ~ p:Ul.~l 1QI~`1~ OIOtIAiQI ~ . wX,'...i.; J ~aj,AlY/W' _ - ' ' • n ~ . . . ~ ` . "pq . . r,7rcer9 1 ti A I~ ' ~ r 1 q ~I~.• • 1 L.JLJ~ II I ~ . . Jij . . . . , . . . . ~ . . . . ~ , : ~ • ]EL~~AMON ~ ' • . . . ~ . . ~ ~ , . _ e . . . . ~ i.~~. .11. ~ . , , . • . . . ~ 8. o0av~• ooov• , oo'q~aT'o~ . • ~ca~a. ~ . or~raar , . ~ 1~ . ~ I . • . I . , ~ " . _ , - 1 •.1 ~fl . , . . ,1~• / 1 , t ' il 1~1'......y 1 ~,~J , i ~,i1 ~ ~ 1 •I}... 1.. - I_ . _ r ~1 • . _ . c ~ ~ • _ I i ~ 1 . - ~•Y• i 1 ~ . ' ~ I .i ~I ~ . iw/ . I . • ~ / " , ~ • ~ A~r , I ; ,11? 1 ~ ; ~ _ . r' ~1 1 . . 1 •,1 . . , tl • / I . /~y, . ' . 1 v -T . • , I • , ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ I I ` • ' ~ I° 2 . ~ ~ fl . .Y. ~ , ' ~ ~IDI~ 0~ ` ? / ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ . . . _ -y-- v ~ ~ - ~ ~ I . ~ ~ \ - . _ . . . _ . ~~r r~- , - . , ~ _ ' } ' . . • 1'~ . ~.._.i1 i • ~T: • •~iT: , ~ ^t~ ` • ~ ~ I . • __.i,~' ~`i ~f ' . ~ .i1 _ • ~ ' _ " q~ ~ ~ ~ Nlk~ `a, ? i..._ . . .I-• } ~ t . ! ~ ! I 1 1 ' ~ V 1 . ~ ~ ' .i• . Cw7 I ~ . . ' ' ~ 1~? t ~ i , ~ ~ I ~~3- , , ~ 1 • ~ ~ ' , ' . • . 1~~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ` \ ~ `l~, .Ir. r , 1 ^~,t~r~.~ ~ ~ ~ V,'.~,`;`•.v. 1 ;f , ~ ' ~ . .:GO/VG f'/!! ~ • \ 1 . • . . ' I ~`1 1 i • '~~~j%~, V ~ i • i ~ _ ' I ~ - i ' I v _ ~11, _ _ - - _ . ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ '~T '!v ? wy.,~~•i / ~ ~ ra. I •i.. .p..',.•. `~~+.:r::•', '5.~.• / .r~ ~ ^ - , . ~ , . , s. . . ; ~.,s~:•:.~ : : - ~ r . .j;,~i.~ , i- ' rlb . \ 1 ? s~__' _P _ '1 ~ y • 1 . ~ . ~ i . . ~ I ~ • ~ ~ I ~ ' I ~ ~ 0 I • ~ - ° ~ t . ' ~ i a . . - ' FILE COPY T~f~I *IL 75 South Froratage Rond . Office of the Town Attorne Yail, Colorada 81657 970-479-2g07/Fax 970-479-2157 . MEiVIOR4ND@JRfi1 TO: Planning & Environmen4al Comeraission FROM: R. Thomas Moorhead ,LL DA~'E: r - . .November 27, 1995 REe I have been asked by the PEC fo provide an oPinion concerning the requesY for a Conditional Use Permit on the thirci anc9 fourth floors of the Serrano's building. It is my understanding thaY the applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permi4 fo allow for personal lockers, steam room and showers, office space for building and club operabons, drinking establishment, meeting and dining roorns. This use would be replacing the prior approval for a residential condominium on the third and fourth floors of the building with_ office space on the third floor. Secfion 18.24.050 B provides for eating and drinking esYablishments including cocktail lounges and bars, coffee shops, foun4ain and sandwich shops, anci aestaurants above the second floor above grade. These uses are subjecY to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 18.60. A description of the proposed uses seem 4o meet this requiremen4 for CC9. • Though this application originally describecl a"private club" it has been amended by the applicant to allow for availability to the public. This woulci qualify as a"quasi-public" use which is charac4erized by its availability fo the public, with or vvathout cost, bu4 which is conducted by an enti4y, organization, or person which is no4 a governanental entity. Section 18.04.282 of the Municipal Code. . An issue has been raised by the East Village Homeowner's Associa4ion characterizing 2his applica4ion as inappropuia4e "because the proposal wi18 allow the building 4o becbme totally commercial, the proposal is contrary 4o the purpose and inten4 of the zoning regulations and supporting planning documenfs established for CC1 ancd CC2." Nlr. Lamohf relies upon a prologue from a 1975 ordinance $o support his position. RECYCLEDPAPER _ - s 3jil yq03 , In 1981 the commercial core 1 district provision was amended to include the foilowing Purpose Statement . "The commercial core one district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and. commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The commercial core one district is intended to insure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. District regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to insure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly cfustered arrangements (sic) of buildings fronting on pedestrian ways and public green ways, and to insure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the building."- The legistative intention that Mr. Lamont relies upon from Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1975, is not. found in the above Purpose statement Likewise, there is no prologue in Ordinance No. 21, Series of 198a, adopting the new Purpose statement that is consistent with that cited from 1975. Upon a review of Chapter 18.24 and the Vail Village Master Plan, I can find no provisions which preclude the granting of the Conditional Use Permit requested. The present building which is being replaced does not, to my knowledge, contain residential units, lodges, dwelling units or accommodation units. The Vail ViIlage Master Plan does contain the objective to increase the number of residential units available for short term, overnight accommodations. The policy supporting that objective states: "The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required to' be designed or managed in.a manner that makes them available for short term, ovemight rental.° While it might be appropriate to encourage this applicant to include an accommodation unit or units within the development, I can find no authority requiring a residential use in this building. I would be happy to respond furthet' as necessary. ~ Thank you. RTM/aw = C:\Peamem . - ~ . ~ • . , . ~ ' . PLANNING AND IENVIRONMEtVTAL COMNIISSION November 27, 1995 MinuYes . fVIEMBERS PRESENT: NdF-M6ERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Bob Arrnour Torn Moorhead. Greg Arnsden Mike Mollica Greg iVloffet . Jim Curnutte . Henry Piratt Lauren VVaterton Jeff Bowen Randy Stouder Daiton Williams George Ruther Kevin Deeghan (1 hour late) Judy Rodriguez Public Bearina _ 2:00 p.m. The meeting was called to order by Bob Armour at 2:05 Kevin Deighan was not presenY. - Mike Mo?lica asked for a Cornmission discussion and voYe on an issue with the VA temporary tent in Lionshead. Randy Sgouder staYed that the VA temporary tent is made of vinyi, rather than canvas (approved material) and he felY that the PEC should review the change in fabric. He said there would also be rougtn_ Iog siding on the fower portion of the tent. He asked ihe Commission to discuss the material change. Jack Hunn said the current fent was not portable9 however, the fabric is of the same quality. , DalYon !i!/i;liams had a problem with the rough wood siding and with the material change. He stated thaY the wooci siding would make ihe tenY look like an old k+eat-up shed. Last year's material was better. Dalton said to put back what was approved, the size cons4ruction.etc. Jack Hunn said the new location was approved. Dalton Williams said last year's ten2 had ro11-up sides and the current tent with wood siding prectudes tha$. VA is modifying an approval. He is not in favor of approving this change. Jack Hunn saeci the rough siding was added fo give the tent a western look and character. Randy Stouder also addec6 that staff recommended that the rough siding be added. . Greg Moffet a.skeci if the same material from last year was still available. Jack Hu-nn saici that it was9 but it wouldi have to come from a different manufacturer and this would gake more time. Jack requested going through one year looking like it does. They made a mistake by puMing ihe shiny side ouY instead of the dull side. Three fabric samples were shown to Yhe PEC. Jack sYated thaY sample #I was last years fabric, sample # 2 is this years, with the . exception that the shiny sicie mistakenl}p was puY on the outside and can't be turned inside out at this point. • 1 ~ • ~ Dalton 1E6Tilliams said sample # 3 is acceptable: . Greg Moffet'moved that the tent fabric be changed to.sample # 3 with the rough siding this year, before Ghristmas. . GregAmsden seconded ihe motion. - The vote was 5-1, with Dalton Wilfiams opposed, because the wood siding is not in the same* tasie as the rest of Lionshead. ~ 1. A request for a setback variance to allow for a residence under consVuction to encroach - into the front setback located. at 2850 KinnickinnicWLot 6, Innsbruck Meadows ` Subdivision. ' . : Applicant: Am. Bros. Development Inc., represented by Bob Borne Planner: George Ruther Greg.Amsden abstained from this item. George Ruther gave an overview of the request and stated that in staff's opinion, Criteria A2 and B1 had not been met and staff is recommending denial. Bob Bome, the applicant, expressed embarrassment and gave an apology for this error. He stated that he has been doing this type of work for 35 years and this is the first time a surveyor has done something like this. Bob Borne mentioned that he has established a new procedure in his company because of this error. He explained that his company would request a preliminary ILC everytime a foundation was located near a setback line. He feels with this new procedure, a mistake tike this can be avoided in the future. This is a result of an error in the surveying technique. The hardship of taking down the building is extreme and the punishment does not fit the crime. Bob Armour asked if the spacing between the buildings would be compromised. Bob Bome said the lot lines are imaginary it would not compromise anything. George Ruther asked if the building was pushed. back would it not encroach into the required bui(ding separatio.n. . . Bob Bome said no. Henry Pratt recommended denial because he thought there may be a grant of special privilege. Datton ldttilliams recommended denial because of special privilege. He stated that Bob Borne is . in the business and should not make mistakes like this. Jeff Bov+ven had nothing to add. . Greg Moffet recommended granting a variance with conditions as listed in the memo. Bob Arrreour noted that a letter that Bob Borne sent was now in the packet: Bob Armour said a preliminary ILC adds another step in the already long process. He sees no harm in this building • betng 3_5' in the setback and he is in favor of it. •Planning and Environmental Commission • Minutes Nwember 27,1995 2 ~ . . 9 ' ` Jeff made a motion for deniale - , Daltorn @Ptfilliams seconded the motion. . Dalton asked if he missed something similar thaY had been previously approved during meetings in the past. Dalton said his concerns were that in his 6 years on the Board9 they made someone take a iroof off for a similar situation: Bob Armmur reminded the Commissioners thaY there is a motion on the floor and discussion . should have been taken up in the vvorksession. . George Ruther mentioned the MusyU residence anci the Plnichael Lau4erbach residence on Sandsione were similar situations where. sunreying errors caused buildings to be non- ' conform8ng, however, the PEC had granted a variance. Daltoru YVilliams said errors and omission insurance should cover this Ioss. Bob Boraae said with regard to the Musyl residence9 the surveyor made a 2.5' error in height. The Boazd granted this variance. 1-te stated that the home (Unit 6, Innsbruck Meadows) is sold and the owners want to move in. It cannot be moved. • Bob Armmur reminded Bob Borne that there is ara appeals procedure after the PEC vote. Dalton VVilliams asked the staff if there is any such thing as a penalty to the surveyor because of this error- George Ruther said he is noY aware of any way for the Town to penalize the surveyor. The vote was 3 in favor of denial and 2 opposed for denial. Mike fVlollica stated that Bob Borne had 10 days im appeal to Town Council regarding the PEC vote of cfen;al. ' 2• A request for an amendmeng to Chapter 1824.050, Permitted and Conditional Uses Above Second Floor, Yo clarify the Zoning Code regarding the removal of dwelling units' and accommodation units for all floors above the second floor, requiring a Conditional lBse Permit. Applicant: Town of Vail Manner: George Ruther . . George Rufher gave an overview of the request and stated that he was bringing it 4o the PEC as a housekeeping item. If we are proposing to keep the use the same, there would be no change in the peffmhted use.. TMis change-iru:the permitYed use is in the staff memo with the language. Staff -feeFs this change should be rnade to create cmnsistency ira the code. Bob Arm(ouir asked Tom Moorheaci if he vvas going to say anything on this subject. Jim Lamonit, represenYing the EVFiR, vdould like tm see the language strengYhened and is in favor . of the change, because it promotes the mixed use in fhe neighborhood. -Greg fVlaiffeQ asked if we were recomranending this $o go to Council. Plarening and Envirmmental Commission Minuies . Alwembea 27,1995 . 3 . I George Ruther said yes, ttiat any change to an Ordinance goes to the Council. Greg Arnsden is against it because it is an addition to a process that is not needed. Jeff Bowen said it tightens up the Ordinance. He proposed that in addition to the staff's ' language some of the uses in the memo should be deleted such as delicatessens and specialiry food stores, Variety stores, Liquor stores, Radio and N stores and repair shops and kennels. Dalton Williarns said it reduces density in the wrong place and so he is in favor of it. Dalton said to delete dog kennels, but wants to stick with the text that staff recommended. - Henry Pratt falls between the two Gregs. He can go either way. Bob Armour is in favor of it. Jeff.Bowen made a motion'to approve this request for recommendation to Council with the additional language that dog kennel and Household Appliance stores be removed. Greg Alloffet seconded the motion. . " Dalton Williams said he hates to tinker with the wording on the spur of the moment, although he is not in favor of dog kennels being included. Jeff Boweri reminded the Commissioners that this is goirig to Council. The vote was 4 in favor and Greg Amsden and Dalton Williams opposed. 3. A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a"quasi-public club" to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors "of the Serranos Building located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing. -Applicant: Gretta Parks, represented by Glen Heelan. - Planner: Jim Curnutte _ Bob. Armour reminded everyone that at the last meeting this item was tabled. Tom Moorhead gave his.determination of a Conditional Use Permit and clarified it with a memo. He does believe the application meets the Conditional Use criteria and a privafe club is not an issue. !t is his understanding from the Conditional Use standpoint, nothing stands in the way of issuing it. There was a New Purpose clause adopted in 1980 and nowhere under the CCI regs is there identified any requirement that each building have a residential component. There is no ' reference to dwelling units, so basically he could not find any regulation that would preclude granting this-request. The building that is being replaced had no residential component. Jeff Bowen said the applicant has changed frorn a private club to a quasi-private club. His question is does that use fit within the Zoning Code. Henry Pratt asked if excluding clubs was intentional. Tom Moorhead said that under the present application, if is available to the public for a fee. Jeff Bowen asked if that would be Tom's opinion if it would be a private club. Planning and EnvironmeMal Commission • Minutes November 27, 1995 4 4 9 0 ' Torrn Moorhead said he didn't know. V1/hat is being proposed +'s not a private club. Glen Heelan said he doesn't have a lot to add. VVe have identified the issues. The 3rd and 4th floor es simiiar to an eating and drinking establishment. Jirr~ L=-mon8, representing the EVHA, asked Torn if this is quasi-public, do these definitions stem ~ from the open space zoning issues. How do vve define private. If one needs a membership to join aprivate club iri other zone districts and also has a membership in a quasi-public club; what is the clifference between them. Torrs Moorhead said the use is issue being addressed. In 1980 the New CCI Purpose statement did not reference any old language. Old language weight was lost with the New Purpose statemenY. Jim Lamon$ said a policy issue is the argument. ThaY this use will not change the character of _ the ne~ghborhood is a fallacious argumenY. Clearly any new building must conform to the mixed use gcals. Our discussion here should be if we can have accommodation units in the building and stffl have a club. He talces argument with staff and stated tha4 we have to be very careful if we are cchanging our philosophical goa1S. If vve are going to follow the staff's recommendation, then ai precedent will be set that will eventually do away with the mixed use in the neighborhood. 1Ale dan't want to become a sales tax cow to finance the government. . Kevira Deighan arrived at 3:05p.m. Tom NCmorhead said accommodation units are encouraged. VUhat staff has recommended clearly referefar-es the policy that is now in effect. Greg MoffeY is in favor of it but tivith minor changes. He would like a condition to be added that aPpl?cant apply for a public tiquor license. Greg Amsden agrees with Greg Moffet's comments. VVhat if the success of the private club was so go0d ihat they want to go totally private. Some recourse needs to be done by the Town. He • didn't Uaink many people aciually reside in the CCI Zone District. He doesn't believe iYs a residerafial sector. Henry Pratt said this use is beneficial to the Town. We must evaluate these requests on a case by casze basis. VVe should consider a restriction against live music; where a party might bring in amplifo-led or live music. Jim Cuumutte stated that ihe noise ordinance vvould deal with any live music. Henry. PraYt said the noise ordinance is reactive. He would like to prohibit it altogether and take an actswe s2ance v?rith this condition. . Glen Fgeelan said it may be appropriate to have live music, such as a piano bar as long as it complie~s with the noise ordinance. Tom Kffiborhead said iq comes down fo the design of the amplified sound system. We may want to consgder some Yype of condition 2o approve the design of the amplified system. Jim Cemnutte said existing noise ordinances anc? promises by the applicant made him believe that this v?rou9c9 be complied with. Planning and Environmernal Commission • Winutes November 27, 1995 5 . , i . Glen Heslan said they are air-conditioning the whole building to control noise. He stated ihat he is sensiiive to the noise issue. . . Dalton Williams sees no problem with the proposed use. That is what the village is about. This . is a case where the building has never had accommodation units and so is not setting a pEecedent. . . Je#f Bowen said AU's are important but not necessarily in the village. This is an excellent use of • the building. He still has a problem with the.exclusivity.. . Jim Lamont said this was a mixed use building in the 1970's. In response to Greg's point; In the '79s it was employee housing and that is why the horizontal zoning was passed. The cornrriercial value is exceeding the residential value. We are not here to protect the locals, but to protect the residential use. Residential means being made up of residential and accommodation unats. We are making a decision in a de facto basis to turn it into all commercial. Jim tends to agree with Tom regarding having a sound design system. Bob Armour is on the fence. It is not an existing lodge, nor wil( it be. He is against a private - ctub: A quasi-private is somewhat better. Jim Cumutte clarified the horizontal zone and that this property, in relation to a quasi-club, meets the criteria for a Conditional Use . Bob Armour said he wants to change the two year start date to one year. Greg Moffet agreed that he doesn't want it two years from today. Tom Moorhead said the approval stiould be concurrent with the date. Kevin Deighan said he will not vote on this issue, but is happy with the change to quasi-private. Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve with the additional conditions that the applicant must carry a public liquor license and that the approval run concurrently with the approval of the original projecti Greg Moffet seconded the motion. - Bob Armour stated that in April 1997, this Conditional Use would expire should there be a lapse in construction. Dalton Williams wanted it clear that if it becomes a private club, it will no longer be able to . operate_ . Tom Moorfiead said,the applicant's change-o# use is not being hindered by the State Legislative Liquor Law. . Glen Heelan said we are applying for a hotel and lodging liquor license. Dalton Wlliams reminded the applicant that the Conditional Use approval would go away if it becomes private. - Planning and Environmental Commission • Minutes ' Nwember 27, 1995 6 t ' . o- . `The vote_was 5 in favor and Bob Armour opposed and Kevin Deighan abstaining. Bob Armour is not conv-mced that ihis is an appropriate use and is concerned with pseudo exclusivity. 4. A Qequest for an amendment to Chapter 18.39 of ihe Vail Municipal Code (Ski Base _ Recreationy and an amendmenf fo the previously approved development plars to allow for the redevelopmenfi of the Golden Peak Ski Base, located at 485 Vail Valley Drive / Tract Ffl llai) Village 5th filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th filing. ApplicanY: Vail Associa4es Inc., represented by David Corbin . . Pianner: Jirra Curnutte and Lauren liVaterton . Bob Arrnour asked Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton Yo go through the staff memorandum and talk about staff concerns. He would like to ask the Commissioners how they feel regarding the staff concerns. He reminded everyone that this is not a worksession. Dalton Wiiliams asked to go over Attachment # 1(Zoning Code texY amendments), vote on it and get it oug mf the w,ay. . Jim Curnutte addressed ihe texY amendments in the memo and stated that the changes to the Zoning Code were fairly insignificant. Bob Arrxiour asked the applicant if he had any objection to the proposed changes. . Dave Corbin, with respect to the Ski Base/Rec Distric4, stated that he has no objection to the changes_ VA completely concurs with the changes that staff has proposed. Jim Lamont said the Homeowners Association takes exception. VVhat was negotiated in '83 and '84 are philosphophical issues and rather than take up the PEC's time, the EVHA would prefer to deal wi2h ihe Town Council. Kevin Deighan, Greg Moffet and Greg Amsden had no comments. Dalton Williams questioned why the Tennis Pro Shop vvas being removed. Jim Curnutte said that it is because the Yennis-courts vvere being removed from the property. Henry Piratt had no cornments. Bob Armour haci nothing further to add: . . Jeff Bowen moved that the PEC recommend to Towrn Council that the Ordinance be changed per the staff inemo. ' The mogon was seconcied by Daltoru Vl/illiams. .The voge-was 7-0 for the Ordinance to be changed as per the staff memoe . Jim Cumut4e touched on each of the elemenYs that the redevelopment plan requesg involves. In summairy the building has gotten bigger than was previously approved, but it is still in compliance with the ffequirernents o$ ihe code andl has been since the original submittaf. . Plarming and Environmental Commission Winutes ' Nwember 27, 1995 . 7 , ~e e e4 TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Off ce of the Town Manager Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 MEMORAIVDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Robert W. McLaurin Town Manager DATE: December 15, 1995 SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report Goal Setting Retreat As we discussed last week, we will be setting up a goal setting and strategic planning retreat after the first of the year. I spoke to Dick Bowers, who will facilitate the retreat, and he is available on January 23rd and 30th. Therefore, the Council should decide Tuesday which of these dates works best for you and we will make the final arrangements for this session. CAST Meetinq The Colorado Association of Ski Towns will hold its January meeting on January 11 and 12, 1996. This meeting will be held at the Hilton Hotel in Grand Junction. For your information I have attached ' the agenda for this meeting. Although CAST is formally constituted with Mayors and Town Managers, I wanted to extend an invitation to any of you who may be interested to come to this meeting to meet some of your fellow elected officials in CAST. If you are interested in attending please contact Anne Wright at 2106 no later than December 28th so that she can make the necessary arrangements. IVewlv Elected Officials Workshoq The Colorado Municipal League will be sponsoring a workshop for newly elected officials. This meeting will be held on January 20, 1996 at the Marriott Hotel in Golden. I have attached a copy of the registration form for your information. If you are interested in attending please complete the form and return it to Anne by January 4, 1996. I believe this workshop is most helpful and would encourage those of you that can attend to do so. Please note there will be other session such as this later in the year if you cannot make this one. Christmas Tree Liqhting Ceremonv The Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau will be conducting the annual tree lighting ceremony. on Thursday, December 21st in Vail Village and Lionshead. The ceremony will begin at 5:30 p.m. at the Chart House with appetizers and soft drinks. I believe you may have received a personal invitation to this but if you have not and wish to attend, please RSVP to Jessica Feinberg at 479- 1000, ext. 3014. For your information I have attached a copy of the invitation. RECYCLEDPAPER , Christmas Holiday Plan As we have discussed previously, given snow conditions and the fact that Christmas falls on a Monday this year, we are expecting increased visitation over the past two years. We have been working with Vail Associates and other large employers to implement for the third year a holiday traffic management plan. This plan provides for staggering of work hours, car pooling incentives as well as free bus service in the regional transportation system. This program has been fairly successful over the past two years and we anticipate additional success this year. This year for the first time we are working with Vail Associates to implement a Vail Hosts Program to help assist our guests throughout the peak holiday season period. I will give you a report after the first of the year on the outcome of these efforts. RWM/aw C:\Townmgcrpt , ~ ' . ~ ~ ' , • , , • ~ ~ ' • , • : • 'f_ ' . . % ~ . , . ' • • , , ' ' • ' ~ ~ • , , . • . . • r• . ~ ~ • , . ' . . '-20[~ .3P ~ GuA • ' ~ . ' , • . , ~ f: ~ ~ ~p~ arYflv~ ~ ~ Rc`~7'nr~ ~3~~r,'~~•'°.ry9o ~ Ct71ST 1'iTANG, GRAND JU1V Cll A0~f , ~ , ~ ; ~ • • ~ . o' ' '9 co• , • a•~'ds'~ ~ , J~~&~ 1~° 12, 19~'S' ' • • ' ' • . • ' ' ' ; ' : : ' ; . 0~ ~ ~ JaYAUgy I-L 1995: • . . , , ~ . . , . , rfi~ 6. 00 pm Cocktaiis Observatory o~ 'Hiltozi Hbtel Q~.o 7:00 ~pm Dinne~° Red Cl~ :~Qoifi ~~IBl~tc~i~; M16fel . , . • ~ 4 , r ~ • . Januarv 12. 1995. ~ ~ : • ~~~Xa . ~,~8:~0 ~ ~on$Ilnental, breakf~t at-~e 9: 00 - 12e00 C.A. S oTa meeting L,p Bn ' ' , • ' - ~ . . ~ c~l~ • n°~ A block of ~~oms havd been. reser*e ~ ; , d-~. .~e . `~d.a J[nxa, 2790 Cu-ossroa.ds BNd. @ .~onizo-;I )di"'C" : The : .~4'pt, . a~~ cost gs $~-4.00/roorrfl and ~°oox~s must;be :~s~~e~f by ~ . ~ ~ . ~~uary 1, 1996 to receive the- $44 mentIlon th.e CA5T ~~eting when.. ni-a.kin-g' ' ~ , . . . resereratnon. . ~ : , , , ' ` , ~ ~ . ~~~'o , • ~ ` . • ~ ~ , . . . . ~ Agpda and minutes from last mee~g,~~~~°~~~~~. ~ J'"n~ . . ' ,y, , • ' i~~P. "~°~'~~1,, ~ ~ i`f~'ry,,i 0.~A~ ~ ~ ~ "~s'~' ~i~ ' " ' • . • . Q~,~,,' ' • . C~1'R1) rY"'n . ) ..+'U r.S'~ij , i~~i •~r~15'. u"'D Ef~~~• iS"'~1~~ . . , . . , ~ , , ' . , ~ . . . , . , • ' ' , . . • . ' . . :•i • , , , . , • • .i. • . , , . ' , ' . ' ' • . . Z~~ d • • N3dSti J0 .IlIJ Wti62:60 S6. EI 33Q ~ ~ ~ fools of the Trade C_;°\AL Elected Officials' U(lori<shop a, r~. Jantiary 20. 1996 { ~ klainott Hotel Golden, Colorado . 01 ~ !Locaced at 1717 Denvei Wes[ f-arkway; take Exit 263 off I-70) ~ c ,o ; a 8:00 Registration and Coffee 10:30 Intergovernmental i 0 v o 8:15 Welcome and Introduction Responsibilities: Your Role ~ y in Communicating and ~ .Y ° ~ S u s a n T h o r n t o n, C M L E x e c u t i v e ~ O v Q . Board. Littleton Councilwoman Interacting with Other at-large Governmental Entiti~_s Sam Mamet, ~ 8:20 Parliamentary Procedures: CML Associate Direcror v E Y What You Need to Know ~ u Q to be an Effec[ive Participant 11;00 S u c c e s s f u l W o r k H a b i t s ; r~' rn i n C o u n c i l/ Boar d Mee tings for Elected Officials o"' ~ o Loretta Simonson, Professional Pete Morrell, ~ v ~ ° °1 ~ ~ Registered Parliamentarian ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p M,orrell and Associates ~ v E o L ~ 9:00 Your Responsibilities as an ~ W o Elected Official under the 12;00 Lunch v Conflic[ of Interest and ° CIRSA Municipal Liability Video: ~ E~ v v Open Meetings Laws "Play ic by che Ruies" ~ O~ u ~ Geoff Wilson, CML General Counsel ~ u. C v N, vi 9:45 Break 1;15 Roles and Relationships ~ 0tf v v oLn 10:00 The Basics of of Elected Officials v v o o c Amendment 1 (TABOR) ~ E c: o Shaping Trends and Forces cu v u David Broadwell, Affecting Municipal Governmen[ CML Staff Attorney ~ o Roles of Elected Officials o v o 1 ~ Council/Manager Relationships Effiective Teamwork ; i ` ~ and Communication ~ vi Carl Neu, President, ; ~ I Q a,~., v.c ? Neu and Company ~ ~ v, \ c - 1 ( i• ~ ~ c o N ~ ~ p J ~ 4:00 Adjourn E Q D ~ ) U ~ i l~J lti..Ongra,. atioIrBS ^'ro your eHecgIIonQ Join us at t, •:'ec[ed Offici~ WorkshoP and learn C-a howyou u:r ::.come a morc: effective leader ~n your ~ ' communiry. ~;i~,~' ° { "j 4 , j ; c:_: , The Colora .1o Municipal League invites you to ?n all day trair rng woir"-shop de~,igned to 9ive You a bet- rer overall understanding of :,Iunicipal governr.ient, and how co be a more effec: "ve mayor, cour,;!mem- }fj ber, or board member. ~ y qc~ X~2"t ~ t' Ey ~ 4'~ f: ~ M1 F J~r k: Workshop participants whc -:_end the full day work- cll >shop will receive seven credits toward their Municipal ~ Elected Of;!cials' Leadership Training Certificate or l'j 21 Pin. Sign-up and program description forms vvill tie i" i ~ y provided ir the workshop packet for those rot ~ presently enrolled in the pregram. O . /NH ~ ~ y~,•' . ~r :?~U:The momi, ~g sessions provide basic information on ui > parliamenr~ry procedure, a legal discussion of conflict ~~~~~4 L.1 ~ ~ of interest and open meetings, an overview of the ~ ~ r ~ ~ s~~e fundamentals of the TABOR amendment, a discus- n`' 1~"„,~ N ~ a l1~ w ~i~ sion of intergovemmental relationship,, and a Pre- ~ '~,t ~y~...~;~ ~ ~ " ° - ~ ~?4 r k S Lj h yi ,y# ~ i sentation en ways for elected officia!,' ~ baiance pri- d orities. The roles and rela[ionships sessior: i-ie aftemoon y y~~ ~u4 , , t4 ' will help elected officials understz a^d use th? c ~ skills tha[ contribute to effective )o : -i formulatien ~ ~ and implementation. The f ons corrbine lectures, p ,a ~AV%~~,~ ~ .4 3~"ffl-h.. a provocative video case s: ; and discussion to t""f,~ provide a practical and hig;.., aseful leaming ex- qW, perience. The workshop also provides an excellent opportuniry O to meet and talk with other municipal officials about . S ~,,f •,i .y,~ ~,F common problems and common solu[ions. C' The registration fee for ni mbers 's S65 if received by the League on or before. in. 5, ; 996, and S75 if recerv-d after thaf date. r on-me )ber fees are 585. IM The r.on-refurdable fee -)vers co,t of al? materials lu and iunch. Transportariori is ava:'aUle between Denver Intern2.:ional Airport and the hotel from ~ Golden West Commuter for S30 round trip. N Canua~ 99G Reserva[ions are required; ca(I (303) 342-9300. C ~K ~ 41 '"'XMarrfot~ Hoter'A OVt 'llghC fOOf,, reservations a[ the Marriott Hotel O O car. made by calling (303) 291-3624 or y0 u U COI.OI'adOn - ' 2Z8-9290. Ask fo; "he CML rate of 549. ~i"gFr $ " 0 O c . ~ ~ Q wl,~J¢~rqx ~ y y,~~ M~a ,~+c' y,~s,w ~w'y p Fa' h~~~ qEi~~~r ~ Hop co see y` ~ there! o O v • .n . • Y„ -,..,,,.j,.,..~:~, ~ u,. L. M , , f / . i i. , r I„ L VkILVALLEY ` RECEIVED NOU 2 ~ 19M TOURISM & CONVENTION BUREAU FVA 100 East Meadow Drive • Vail, Colorado 81657 November 27, 1995 Mr. Bob McLaurin 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 . Dear Bob: On behalf of the Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau and the . Town of Vail, I wish to cordially invite you and a guest to attend the 1995 President Ford Tree and Menorah Lighting Ceremonies Thursday, December 21 in Vail and Lionshead villages. Ceremonies begin at the Chart House in Lionshead at 5:30 p.m. with appetizers ~nd soft drinks. The Lionshead.tree and menorah lighting ceremony will begin promptly at 6:00 p.m. Afterward, we will proceed to the Mountain Haus in Vail Village for snacks and warnl beverages. The Vail tree and menorah lightings will begin promptly at 7:00 p.m. at the north end of the covered bridge. The ceremonies wi-I 1 be high-lighted by comments from Presj.. -nt Ford anci our local dlignitaries, along with choral entertaL.:.:ent by Vail's Own Dickens Carolers, the Children's Chorale and so'-ist, Pat Hamilton.' PlFase R.S.V.P. your attendance by calling Jessica Feinberg at the WTC3 at 970/476-1000, extension.3014. If you wish to leave a message, please inforn, us of whether you and a gt.zest ~,iill attend. Plan to dress warmly as the majority of the evening will be spent outdoors. We hope you will be able to j oin us and the Vail community for this annual holiday tradition! Sincerely, ~ William J. Brice Direc'Lor of rromotions and Communications a Central Reservations 1-800-525-3875 Group Sales (303) 479-236r :isines:. '-~r!;cr ' GroupSalesl-800-775-8245 FAX(303)479-2364 FAi,~,;,,,,,•,,;,-6pLI 40 Y - / - (.)l(icc o1 tlec- IZoard uf (.:"nimiissioncrti 1=.at,lc• Coninty Liuilding (970) 328-8605 P.( Rox .950 Fax: (9711) 328 7207 SUU lsn»dway T11I1: (970) 128-879'1 ~ 1::tg1c, I::cilc~~:~clii }i1631UBS() December 12, 1995 - 1 6: . EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO A.(~.~END~ ~OA~ 0`0 UNTY COMIVIlSSIONE1~~ ~ECEMBER 19y 1995 4Qd68 Ce8888~y~ pptyAAZSlSbd61AQ Q0006i604~6h0A~~GOpB-C8e3(yA~d138bAQ d~d13ab~SdA Qpb 9:00 - 10000 aamo UQUOR LJCENgtE FIEARING 9. 6111ANAGERS REGISTRATION - BEAVER CREEI( FQQD SERVICES, IRIC_ dba/SADDLERIDGE AT BEAVER CREEFC ooe RENE1fliAL = ROBERT V_ PRIGMQRE dba/LEGEND s RESTAURANT . P0g. RENEVYAL - MARQUEZ RESTAl1RANTS, INC_ dbaIFIESTA'S NEVV MEXIC,4N RESTAIlRANT W. MANA(aERS REGIS'fiRAT1ON = BEAVER CREEK FOOp SERVICES, INC. dba1BRQKEIV ARR01/V CAFE W. MANAGERS REG15TRAT101V = BEAVER CREEI( FOOD SERVOCES, ?NC. dba1BEAVER CREEdC GOLF CL4JB BAR & CRV« Eaaiene RoaePu, Liquor Inspec4or 90:00 -~1 -.00 ADARAS RIB G LF C llRSE PIDBLIC FYEARING Keieh AAontag, biractor, Gommunity Developanent 19 000 - 9 9 e19 ffi.a~uo BREAYd 51909s - 11:30 ~1a~'ilo PLAY AiVD RESOLUTION SIGNING Kathy Eastley, Planning Technician, Comnnu~ity DevePopment r . Eiagte Board mf County Commissoonars Agenda, Decernber 9 9, 1995 Page Two 95120 - 11o46 a.me Z§-370-95-13ELL1fACIiE RIDGE CQMMUIVICATION §ITE Paul Clarkson, Planner, Communi4y Development ~CTIONe To mnsider an expansion of the Bellyache Ridge Multi- user Communications Si4e. 11.45 - 12.00 pomo C FiT9F1CAT10P1 F It.L LE1/iES . ' Allen Ssrtin, FinanCe Directou' Mark Silverthom, GontrolleP 12_oo - 9000 P.M. UNCH 9 ~OD -2a00 p.ma . PD-293-95- -C RDILfLER14 SUBDIVISION Sid Fox, Planninq Division 9Vlanager, CommuniQy Development ~C71ON: Tm add 320 acres, 4he Bearden pars:el, 4o the Cordillera P19D. PD- 9 -96aA-CORDILLERA BDBVISION Pl1D CONTR L -QQCUMENT Ssd Fox, Planning Division Manager, CorYlmurtity Development ACTDON: To add 320 acres, 4he Beardera parceB, to the CordilleP'a PvD. . 2,00 _ 2o15 p.m. SE-398-95- FI OD EXENIPTION Kathy Eastley, Plan. Tech. Community Development ACTaO6~: Exempt a 3.359 acre parcel which was creatad in 1975. . 2:45 - 3=00 P.M. WORK SESSION - COMIIlIIlPlITY DEVELOPMENT . KeIth Nlontag, I7irector Community Development 3.00 - 4:00 P.M WORIC 59SSION = BFI RIECYCLIIdG PROPOSd4L Don Fessler, Road & Bridge Director. Ron Rasnic, Solid VVaste Coordlnator . 'YHE PMT MEE71Nc3 oF YHE EAGLE CWNTV CauallssIordER3 WALL BE PIELD ow ,wwuarar 2, 19es ALL MEEY1N05 W6L BE HELD IRf Y99@ MLE COUNTV BUIMNCa -Soq BROADWAY. EIIOtE - 003 07p1ENVN6E NQ7F-0. YHIS SGEPddA IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMA71atdAL PURPqSES ONLY - ALL YIMES ARE APPROXOdATE, 74iE BOARD twflilLE IW 9E8SIOW MAV COF151DER 07HER ITEkAS YSiAT ARE BROUQHY BEFpRE (Y. ~ (.)ffii:c ~~I tlr Bo~rd n( (;ommis~i~ucis ('!70) .1-2$-H(iUti h1gIc (AuuIily 1311ildinE F;tx: (9i0) 1214 7707 . 1'.0. li~)x 850 (970) 32R 8797 . . 500 1911%1dway , l:,f;lc, ("~i>r~~do R i Fi3 f-t1RSC1 DecembeP 12, 9995 - 9:35 EAGLE COiIIVTY, COLORADO AGEnl ~ ~ ~RD J'U'z"F UNTY COMIUI1SSIONER ~ ~~~ULAR MEEToNG DAY - DECEfVlBER 1 8,1995 1} 4 4 Y} O 4{t q A 8 Q 4!S f~ O Q 3 Q 6 8 4 Q 4 A A d Q 4 R'tr tY R~;t 4 Q Q fl 8:30 - 10:00 WORK SESSION = PIEfVD11oIC; LITItaATION James R_ Fritze, Courat}/ Attomey 40006 - 9015 BREAK 10:95 d 91095 WORK SESSION a 1AIrzE1CLY 4lPDATE 91AS - 12°00 WORi( SESS9ON - AIIEETBNGS ATTEIVDED 92:00 - 1e30 [LUNCH 1:30_ 1:49 CONSENT CALEIVDAR Itmme of a routine and nomconlmvomlel neturo 8re pkCed On yho co,mnt ealendar tn Ollow ph'P goerd oi Caunty Commiaeionsre lo spond its Ume end en6e9Y ofl mare Imporlent tROme oA A 1en89hy ogeride. qng Commienloeer mpy requew lhat en Irom be °RlfMO11E0° Prom 1hm consent oalendar ad consldered 30138re4mro, Aaro mmmbev of the pyblic may `ftEQt1E5T' any Rem me °REMOVED' from the Cnesant Agenda. ~o BIIl.L PAY0NG FOR TH6 tlYEEKR7 OF DEMoEMB4QO ~a A1YD DECEMBGR 66 . Linda Pankuch, Accounting Mart Silver4horn, Con4roll~~ ~c'noma Approval subjecQ to review by 4he Cllairman. 2. PAY R09..L FOR DECEIVIBER 21, 9995 Mark Silvertharra, Gontroller ACTU~N.- APProbal subject go revievv by ghe Chairman. Eagle Coun4y Cornmissioeters Agenda, December 18, 9995 Page Two 3- ADDENDUM TO SUBDIVISION OARPEt01lEMENTS AGREEAAENTFpR SOPRIS 1/fEWVApAitTAAENTS PARCELS Op 'V' ilp Y/io9 VilU John AYthoff, Engineering ACTION: Consider approdal. ' ~INAL RELFJ45E OF COGLL4TERAL AND TERMINATION THE WAFtRdINlTY PERIOD F01t CASTLE PEAiif TOiNNHOMESe BUlLDINGS E AVD F Joh ACTION: COP1SlCJeP appPobaP AIthoff, Engineering AUTH0R1~E FIIVAL FtELEASE OF COLLAT'ERAL FOR SOPRIS VlEV4i APARTMENTS, PAFdCEL 01 John vI,AYthaff, Engineering ACT9ON= ConsideP appPO 6. FINAL ~~LLATERAL AAID TERMiNATlO1V OF THE lN1ARRANT1( PEIZIOD FOR Sl1MM@T VISi'A, PFBASE 19 SUBDNISION Mike GrubeP, Engineering ACT8ON; Consader approval. T. APP~OVAL OF Pl1FtCNASE OF RI4NGER plC1C-UP FQR . 7HE ENGINEERING DEpARTMEfVT Bill Smith, Motor Pool ACTION: Consider approvaE S. ~gN3~RGOVERAIMEiVTAL AGREEMEIVT BETWEEN EAGLf~ l~iOl1/NTYD SQA~~E OF CO`OfiC?6./O A7\D TF7E A6P9tlA~ ~F F-AGLE FOR ANIMAL CpNTROL SERVICES Bob Slegle, Animal Control Director ACTION: ConsideP approvaP. 0. CONTRACY RENEiAIAL BETf41EEIV EAf;LE COIJNTYo OF COLpRADO AIVD THE COLOiiAbO DEP641tTAAENT OF HEA~TH qIVD ENVI1tOIVAIIEIdT W1C PROGRAM . Kathleesl Foryryash, Health & Human Serdices DIP@(tOP ACTION: CoOP'9$fdBP c21pp9'OVaI Eagle COuntY Commissioners Agendim, peeembeP '8 a, 1995 Page Th~~~ ~~GLE COIJNTY VETERANS 5ERVICE OFFICER°S ~~~THLY ItEPORT FOR IYOVElUIBEFt 1995a Jadc Johnson, 9leterans Setvice Officer ~CTION: Consider approval. 9:49 - 2"00 ~~~~~UTIOfVANDpOWEitOFATTORIVEYAIITHORlZING DRAINING ON LETTER OF CREplT FOft BASALT TRADE ASSOCIATES ACTllON~ CoP~side~ a~Opr~i aFr'itze, Cvunt~+ A4tomey 2:00 _2-16 Q`VD Ai'PiiOYE LANDFILL DES9GN, OPEIZATIONS AND , CLOSl1RE pLAN FQR EAGLE CO11NT1(AS PREPAOtED BY acRw CoNsuLnNG (2' siGN cOVER t.ETrER To COLORApO DEPARTAAENT OF PUBLlC HEAL7"H AIVD E1dVIRQdVAAEN7' REQUE$TING APPR0I/AL Ron Rasnic, So1id Wagte Coordinator Don Fessler. Road & Bridge Directar ~CTION: Consider approval. 2'15 - 3c1 a WOF81C SESSIONI - REVIEV1o OF THE 1996 FdiJMAN SE1aVICES GRANT$ Kathleen FoNnash, lieaith & Human Services DirectoP . 3.95_ 4'00 fBOARD OF SOCIAL 3ERVICIE3 AAIEET[NC; Kathleen Forinash, Nealth & Piumen Services Darector WORK SESSlO1V dANIAAAL CONTftOL 15Sfl1ES AIVD 1996 RESOLUTdON E30b $lagie, ,4njmal Cantrol Director THE WEXT flqEETlpJO OF T}qE EAGLLr CpVR1Y COMMIS31pP1ER3 4WLI, HE FIELD Oly DECEMBER 99. 9885 ALL flAEETifdGS MLL BE h1ELD IA1 THE FAGL.E COURffY BUILDIMO - SOD BRdAQiNAY, EAGL.E- OR OTHERVNSE I407ED. • Yi11S RtENDA fS PROMDED prcut uYFQRMA710NA1. PuRPOSES ONLy - ALl T1MEg ARE APPROXNMTg. ~ ~ "ILE IN SEg8101d MAV CONSIOER bTHER ITEA9s THA7 qRE BROUoNT BEFaRE IT. _ C)Ffict- uf llle lioard oF (:ummk.icmcrs i'Ar{Ir ('nuiily IZuil(Iillg (97()) 378-$6(}5 P.U. Rox 8ti{) (1)10) 318-7707 , 500 Briiadw;ry (970) 328 8797 1;aglc, C:iilur;uln 81631-0850 . . Decernber 14, 1995 - 9:1 ~~UNTY, COLORADO AGENDA ~OARD OF %*'wA'f"O`UfVTY COMIVIISSIOtVERS ~~R MEETS NG DA1r DECEMBER 250 1J95 a~~ a a a a a a a o o a a a rr c o a e~ a~ o u u u a a a a a o m u a u a n CHRISTMaS DAY C041NTf' OFFICES CLOSED R9O 6~~~ULAR MEETIi11G OF THE L~~~E BOARD OF C0911VTY CONAMISSiONE1ZS Y6iE PlEXYRAEETIidC'n OF YH@ EAGLE CpUPoTY CONffU115510MER$ MLL 8E QIELD OIV JANUARV Q, 1996 ALL MEETIPIas MLL BE F9ELD lid 7P9r: EAaLE COUfdTY BU1LpING - 500 BROADWAY, EAGLE- ors oniERW19E MOTED. T9f15 AOENDq 13 pRpMDED FOFZ INFORWSq7Ip(dqL pURPOSES ONLy -ALL 71NIE5 ARE APPAOXIMqTE, Y@1E BOARD MiII.E IfV SESSiofv WIAY COMSIpER OlNER REMS 7HATARE BROUGHT BEFORE IT. U(fii:v n( llie Rotird of C'cimniixsianciti li;il:lr. C;cninry Ritildint; (970) 3714-86U5 ' I'.(). iiux RS() I ax: (4)'/0) 328-7207 , 500 liroadway Il)Il(<):(!) 3'/.N-8797 1`:1gltr, t.i>Ic~r;uln R16iI Uti:~(1 . December 94, 9995 - 9:1 1~~~~ COMMo COLORADO G A EN~~ 0AR 0F lJ N TY COIVI IVI I S S ION E RS . Rf~~ULAR MEETING DAY ' L~~~EM~ER 26y 1995 Q Q'a Q a' d k b' A' 8 Q R C Yi Q 7t 4 Q d O G 4 t? tr Q R A A A A A A A R O O A 4 Uf7~ ~EGUdlt..lJ@R MEEp'NG OF T6-tlE EG~~~~ ~OARD OF COUNTf COIIAAflISS80NEF2S MLL BE HEfl..D ON THIS DATE Y4iE NEXT MEEYIPdO OF 7HE EACLE COUNTY GOMMISSIONE123 lWILL BE P9ELD OW .wuuARv 2 .1e95 ALL AflEETI@dGS Ntql,1, BE HELD IId THE EAGL-c COUidTV BUILDING - 500 BROADWAY, EAGLE- OR OTHERyWSE NOTgD. YMIS AGfPlDA IS PROVJUEp FOR INFORNWA71oNAL PuRPOSE$ qNILV -ALL 71MES ARE /IPPROXIMATE. THE B4A9dD Udh91LE IPd SESSIOIU RAAY COiUSIDEFi O7MER ITF]IAS TFIATARE BROUGHT BEFORE (7. a' Y dd e4 TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 F0R 9(IlAMEDOATE RELEASE December 14, 1995 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office . PERKS a4ND PRUZ[ES IN STORE FOR THOSE W9-90 DO TF$E@R PAIZT TO REDUCE !lA9L'S HOLIDAV TR14FF9C (Vail)--Ride a bus or carpool this holiday season in Vail and you might feel like you just won the lottery. VVith free breakfast coupons and a chance to win some great prizes, new incentives have been created this season to reward those who help reduce Vail's holiday traffic congestion by leaving their cars at home. The "Peak Week Perks" program Dec. 23-31 is the creation of the Vail Community Task Force, which was formed to help implement the managed growth agreement between the town and Vail Associates. With projections for brisk business this holiday season, Vail Town Manager Bob iVicLaurin says the program is essential. "We need everyone's help to pull this off successfully," he said. "In Vail, every car makes a difference in our ability to successfully manage the peak periods. Fewer cars means less congestion on the roadways, improved parking availability and a better overall experience." fVicLaurin says he's inviting residents to join him in riding the bus to work each day. Those who ride Vail's outlying routes or the Gypsum-to-Vail bus will get a coupon for free breakfast, plus a punch card. Get the card punched at least eight times (one punch per ride) and you'll earn a chance to win some great prizes, including a 10 day , ~ (more) RECYCLEDPAPER Peak Week/Add 1 ski pass, 10 day Vail Athletic Club membership, cassettes and CDs from KTUN radio, plus restaurant and merchant gift certificates. Similarly, those who carpool with three or more occupants at the Ford Park or soccer field lots between 8 a.m. and.1 p.m. Dec. 26-31 will receive free parking plus the punch card. Once the card is punched at least eight times (two punches per trip), carpoolers will be eligible for the Peak Week Perks prizes, as well. For those who need help finding carpool companions, the town's environmental office will assist through a new program called "E-Ride," short for Eco-Ride. The service is available to employees who work within the boundaries of the Town of Vail who regularly drive to work and would like to share the cost of the commute. The number to call is 479-2224. Incentives also are in store for those who volunteer to become Vail Hosts, assisting guests with skier-drop off and other needs. Volunteers will earn two free lift tickets and half price lunch on the mountain for a nine hour commitment over two days. Employer Participation . In addition to the Peak Week Perks program, Vail's three largest employers will continue to play a role in reducing traffic. For the third year, the Town of Vail, Vail Associates and Vail Valley Medical Center will implement a multi-faceted plan for increased employee bus use, carpooling and.staggered..work.shifts during the 9-day peak period. Collectively, the three organizations employ about 4,500 workers. Those employees will be offered free bus tickets for the Avon/Beaver Creek Transit system and the Gypsum-to-Vail Express service, while workers who live outside (more) a ~ a Peak Week/Add 2 scheduled bus routes will be encouraged to carpool. Employees also will be asked to arrive before 8 a.m. or depart after 6 p.m. In fihe Vail Associates lots, company employees wrho carpool (2 per car) will receive free parking, plus 4he Peak UVeek punch card. Those who don't carpool will be charged a daily fee of $2. The fees collected will be used to fund the free bus passes for Vail Associates employees. In addition, for each day employees of Vail Valley flAedical Center (WiViC) leave their cars at home (Dec. 18-29), the hospital will provide a$4.50 voucher for 4he hospital cafeteria, which is triple the normal value of the voucher. Following the holidays, WMC will continue providing free bus passes year-round for employees who commute from Eagle, Gypsum, Leadville and Edwards. The Community Task Force will monitor effectiveness of the peak management program by evaluating traffic count comparisons, bus ridership figures, parking structure numbers, skier numbers, weather conditions, visual observations and visitor surveys. The program will be repeated during President's Weekend Feb. 16-19. For more information on the program, contact Vail Town Manager Bob iVicLaurin at 479-2105; Chris Ryman at Vail Associates, 479-3020; or Stan Anderson at Vail Valley iViedical Center, 476-2451. # # # . ~ ToWN oF vAIL . ~ Iaiput/Iriquirj' ~ZesPonse Record ~The attached comments were recently received by the Town of VaaI. We encourage Vail residents and guests to give us such input and we s4rire for tirtely respoaues. PLEASE ADDRESS THESE CONCERNS bV1TF-IIN FIVF. bVORIEQNG DAYS AND REI'URN THIS COMPLETID FORM TO PAM BR.ANDMEYEIL DEPARTiMENT TO HA1~lDLE IIVQUIIZY ' IlVDNIDUAL TO HAiNDLE IlVQLJIlZY Cod DATE TOV RECF.IVED IlvPL1T/ INQLJIIZY Id • Id • 9 5 < < < v TYPE OF IIVPUT/INOUIIZY: . . PHONE CALL (indicate date) ~ LETTER (attached) ? 'L~, ~j~~, ~ ! L' j RESPONSE CARD (attached) TYPE OF RESPONSE (check one): LETTER (attach copy) , PHONE CALL (indicate date) _ BIZTFF SUMMARY nF RESPONSF nR 61~TS4iTEIZ TO IIVOUIRY: DATE OF RFSPONSE FOIZi RETIURNED BY DEI'ARTitiiLNT T'O PAI1/I BRAi'VDMEYER: A copy of this inquiry and focm will remain on 61e at the TOV Communily Relations officr. As saoa as this focm is cetumed to Pun • Brandmeyer, this inquiry wili be aonsideced dosed. T'HA,v'K YOU FOR YOUR TMI.Y HA,\D[LtiC OFTHS LSSUE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUFS'RONS. PLFIISE FEEt. FREE '1'p COM'ACf PAIM BRA,\DMEYER AT 419-2I23. . ~S7xX1.71"I~XJ~~~~ ~~?TlCEST~~ Vw~ p~ ea mome~~ d:o~ ~r~u7r ~c~~.ghts ~nd t.. O:rap off ox m~ai:I ~I~~s ca~d ba~k , . . ux.<~~ ut 77-/c.: Tvcv ~NC) c. - ld ld ~ 45 l,c1N~.~J Yo-v cvnJs„D4~22. 77fc P4y2k1ti1G s~rv~on,l ~Al ~LD kl KC Yov 7O C'OAUSiva-p- 7t~: A5 7¢.c1 OF LJH>/ R47XtJAAArl-5 ¢.5170P.S I&J vitJoT Ns9 vc= f} ~z=A Z;y l vz),4 y-L r18i o? .zocR 4_s f=o~e -ZctrlAv~sJ :c vA,r.V IAv eAJ 1~ . 17 C)51 inL #AJ Afo nm~ - Rndl oye ~vt~ $Qoc.v~C In) 71h o-jNt-R /#~ff AgISS [s -ra 07?/&-je 7?m63 R~z ~ ~ l~ 4lH~~k=-- %a SAbJ° oko ~-~1-! Ozr-, ~[J.~77PLY 7NIS ,BYC."~cruGH P~~LL tIT S4 PoeOB Lt-M• y077 U~.~ ~ qe ~~ppy y. Y~ v ~ 6 V OF ~yA V~ Inpu$/Inqtairy IZ,gspogase Record , 41 The a4tached co~ents c~ere recently gerei~red by the To~ of t7~ We courage Vai1 gesadenes and guests to give tas such input arad we stdre for tiadely respanses. PLEASE ADDRESS THESE CONCIItNS WrIHN RVE WORKNG DAXS AND REI'UItiV THIIS CONTLETM FORM T'O P~ BRANDMEYER. - DEPARTiWEN'I° TO HAiV'VDLE NQIJIIZY IIVDIVIDUAI. T'0 HAt'VDII.E IIVQLTIlZI' K DATE Tov zz~FCEVED INPUr/INetrIRx 14~ ~4 46 , . T= OF IIVPUT/IlVOL.TIRY: PHOIVE CALL (indicate date) , LETTER (attached) 16'6 RFSPONSE CARD (attached) TYPE OF RESPOIVS (check one): LETTER (attach copy) , PHOIVE CALL (indicate date) . BRIEF SLTMmA RY OF R SP(~tVS QR ArvSWM iO INOLITRY; DATE OF RESPONSE FOIZlYI REIZJRNFD gY DEI'ART'MNT T'0 pA,g BRANDMEyER; A copy of this inquiry and form wii( remain on 61e at the TOV Commwity Relations office. As saan a9 this Eocm is retukned to pun • Hrandmeyer, this inquiry will be considered dosed ' THA,VK YOU FOR YO[JR 7DAEZY HA~VDL-IING OF'fIHIS LA'iJE IF YDU HAVE ANY QUFS'i'IONS. PLEASg FEII, FREE Tp CONTACT PAN( BRA,\'DMEYE. AT 479-2113. x d ECEIVED DEC 1 R 17 Vail Road, Unit 2 Vail, CO 81657 and ?266 E. Cape Cod Drive Bloomin;ton, IN 47=101 December 8, 1995 Dear Mayor Armoarr, Mayor Pro Tem Navas; Cozrncil Members Foley, Ford, Jetivett, and Johnston Congratarlations on yoarr election and on yoiir assumption of new and continuing roles. There are significant continzting and emerging challenges in the administration of Yail. From tivhat we read in the ti"ail newspapers, you have the dedicar.ion and intelligence to carn,- oui ycarr important dzrties effectively and we tivish yoar well in that important role. While we may represent one of the special interests that Ms. Oster.f'oss warned against, we zrrge that yoar keep in mind that the btrlk of the city's revenzres and the cazrse of the barlk of the ciry's cnallences are people who do not have an opportzrnity ro vote.for you and have no official constituency voice. We are non-resident property owners and toarrists. We hope you can keep the needs crnd preference~ of these interests in mind as you make dec:s;ons. We applaud the attention to the appearance of the communiry that the planning, zoning, and architectural review process has established and inaintained. This is a key feature that has made Vail "special. " Throzrgh personal experience, we know that this process is complex and causes frustration but tive hope you can maintain the objectives while attending to procedural concerns. Transportation issues seem to have also been addressed effectively with a good bars. system and the new round-abouts that solved a difficult traffic problem in an attractive and functional way. The prior council seemed to have misplaced its priorities in the matter of the City Market proposal. We hope the new coarncii can undo the unfortunate mistalres of the pnor administration. The prior cozrncil members did not even know how many people woarld be housed in the subsidized facilities that are part of the proposal. There seemed to be no appreciation of the needless economic disrzrption that the action plan will sirrely cazrse. 'Two banknrpt szrper markets and no place left for local people to shop than high pr-ice - convenience stores seems like the certain result of the current plan. The entire proposal is much too high a price to pay for a few subsidized housing units for a few Izrcky people. Normally, "affordable" housing occurs as a result of excess housing. Restrictions on development work against this source of affordable housing and Vail has and should restrict development. Therefore, Vail must arse other, normal city services to foster the availability of affordable housing. This includes assuring that utilities are available and that bars service is available in areas where it is economically feasible for developers to bziild affordable .Q e 0 housing. Tax incentives and zoning variances* can also be used. Devoting prime commercial land with easy Interstate highway access to affordable ho:lsing makes no sense. Of course, the council must maintain the mutually supportive functioning of the city and its prime economic force, Vail Associates. While the influence of Vail Associates is pervasive, Vail "is not the only community with this situation. Even in Bloomington, Indiana, oarr primary residence, Indiana University has an unusual influence on city government. "'~zil may be able to learn from the experiences of other communities with a dominant economic influence; non-resident property owners and tourists may have valuable knowledge of those situations that can be shared. We know these are only a few of the key issues to be considered today and during your terms of office. Again, we extend ozrr congratzrlations and best wishes for your success in thoughtfully_firffilling yozr important responsibilities. We urge you to consider the »iews and use the experience of the constituencies who have no voice in yoarr selection. Sincerely ltm Ronald and Carolyn Kove er (h) 812-337-881 5 or 970-476-5990 (o) 703-836-0250 or 812-337-8920 RRKB: council *A developer in Bloomington recently got a variance from parking requirements for an affordable housing proposal by guaranteeing that every resident would have a bicycle. 9 TOWN COUIVCIL COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE APPOINTMEfVTS TO: Town Council FR: Pam Brandmeyer DA: December 12, 1995 RE: Committee/Task Force Appointments This is a list of all committees/task forces to which Council members have been appointed or for which they have volunteered. It is my understanding that all assignments run to the next Regular Municipal Election, IVovember 1997. COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. NWCCOG Sybill Navas (New member), alternate 2. Vail Valley Tourism & Bob Armour & Convention Bureau Rob Ford, alternate (formerly VRA) 3. Vail Transportation and Kevin Foley Parking Task Force Rob Ford, Alternate 4. CAST Bob Armour Bob McLaurin 5. VRD/Council Subcommittee Kevin Foley Ken Wilson Rob Ford Ross Davis 6. Special Events Committee Sybill Navas 7. Bravo! Colorado Board Kevin Foley 8. NWCCOG Water Quality/ Sybill Navas Quantity Committee (New member), apprentice 9. Eagle County Recreation Paul Johnston Authority (New member), alternate 10. Town of Vail Housing Authority Michael Jewett 11. Channel 5 Board Sybill Navas 12. Vail Valley Arts Council Sybill Navas 13. Mauri Nottingham Environmental Bob Armour Award 14. Lodge at Vail Land Swap Paul Johnston Bob McLaurin Tom Moorhead ' 15. Vail Valley Exchange Sybill Navas 16. Regional Transportation Com. Kevin Foley Rob Ford, alternate 17. Ford Park Management Plan Rob Ford 18. The Chamber Paul Johnston 19. Open Space/Charter Committee Sybill Navas ' 20. Art In Public Places Kevin Foley C:\TCAPPTS.LST ~ a; ee e4 ivA TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 MEDBA ADVISORV December 13, 1995 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office TO@i~~ ~OUNCBL 6i9(9HLIGHTS FOR DECEflIIBER 12 Work Sessuon Bruefs Council members present: Armour, Foley, Ford, Jewett, iVavas --PEC/DRD Review During an overview of the most recent meetings of the Planning & Environmental Commission and Design Review Board, Council members learned that four of the seven seats on the PEC and two of the four DRB seats will be up for appointment by the Council in February. --Update and Overview of the Town of Vail/U.S. Forest Service Land Exchange As part of the recommended actions in 4he town's 1994 Comprehensive Open Lands Plan, a land exchange is proposed between the two agencies to remove Forest Service lands from within the town boundaries and to acquire Forest Service lands that have public or private improvements. Specifically, the proposal includes exchanging five properties totaling 85 acres of town-owned land for 11 Forest Service parcels totaling 108 acres. During.an overview yesterday, in which the Council agreed to proceed with the project, Russell Forrest, the town's senior environmental planner, said a critical next step is underway to receive an appraisal of each of the properties. The exchange is intended to trade lands of similar value. The 48'-acre Trappers Run parcel in West Vail is the largest town-owned property proposed to be traded to the Forest Service. The town, meanwhile, is attempting to gain ownership of a parcel beneath the interstate for a possible employee housing project, while many of the remaining parcels would be obtained to convey public improvements, such as roadways, to the town while possibly transferring ownership of driveways and other encroachments to the private property owners. Once the appraisals are completed, a public involvement process will be scheduled to discuss the exchange proposal in more detail, Forrest said. Sybill Navas wondered if adding deed-restrictions to any of the properties wrould make the appraisals more equitable. The initial appraisal work is scheduled to be completed Dec. 22. For more information, contact Russell Forrest in the Community Development Department at 479-2138, or Kathy Hardy, assistant district manager for the Holy Cross District of the U.S. Forest Service, at 827-5715. ~ (more) 1164 RECYCLEDPAPER ~ ~ ~ Council Highlights/Add 1 --Peak Week Perks (Holiday Management Plan) Council members received an overview of a holiday management plan to reduce congestion in Vail during the period Dec. 23-31. Called "Peak Week Perks," the plan uses incentives to encourage use of public transit, carpooling and volunteerism to help create an enjoyable holiday experience for residents and guests. In addition, major employers are being asked to do their part again this year by staggering work shifts - and encouraging use of public transportation. The plan is part of the managed growth agreement between the town and Vail Associates. Incentives have been added this year by members of the Community Task Force to enhance the program and increase participation. A news release detailing the program is forthcoming. --Discussion of Vail Alpine Garden Foundation Lease The Council yesterday agreed to postpone consideration of a request from the Vail Alpine Garden Foundation to sign a 49-year lease with the town for operations at the town-owned Ford Park site. Town Attorney Tom Moorhead had proposed a lease term of 10 years, citing the need for flexibility and to be consistent with the lease established with the Vail Valley Foundation amphitheatre, which is 12 years. In addition, since a six-month master planning process is currently underway to create a management plan for Ford Park, Moorhead said a 49-year lease would be inappropriate until the study is completed. Sammye Meadows, executive director for the Alpine Gardens, said her board had directed her not to accept a 10-year lease. With a capital campaign currently underway to raise $1.5 million for an education center, she said the Alpine Gardens needed a 49-year commitment from the town in order to make the investment on the property. Council members assured Meadows the town had no intention of eliminating the Gardens at Ford Park. They encouraged her to participate in the master planning process while they give more thought to the extended lease request. The Council will take the matter up again at the Jan. 9 work session. --Information Update A new voice mail system for Council members has been created to encourage public contact. The system is activated by calling 479-1860. Public Works/Transportation Director Larry Grafel announced delivery of a the first of eight new low-floor 40 ft. buses for the in-town shuttle system. The bus, which will increase carrying capacity on the route, will be put into service next week. For details, contact Grafel at 479-2173. At the request of Eagle County, the Council authorized an appropriation of $1,000 from the 1996 budget to assist with a statewide feasibility study on intercity passenger/commuter rail. Also, Kevin Foley, Larry Grafel and Todd Oppenheimer ' agreed to assist Eagle County Engineer George Roussos as possible alternates on the ~ Colorado Department of Transportation steering committee, which will direct the study over the next 12 months. (more) r d* s < Council Highlights/Add 2 --Council Reports Sybill Navas reported on a recent meeting of the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments in which affiordable housing on Forest Service lands was a discussion topic, among others. Kevin Foley gave an upda4e on the first meeting of the Regional Transit Authority. Next steps include creation of a draft operational plan for the new regional transportation system. Foley also reported on a meeting of the Art In Public Places (AIPP) board. Interviews for an AIPP coordinator will be held on iVionday. Bob Armour reported on a meeting held earlier in the day with representatives from the Lionshead Merchants Association, Vail Village iVlerchants Association, Gallery Association and the Vail Valtey Tourism & Convention Bureau. Topics included streamlining the town's rules and regulations and a shortage of seasonal housing. Armour said the representatives agreed to actively par4icipate through focus groups and other actions to help make improvements. --Other In response to a quesfiion by Sybill Navas, Town fVianager Bob fVlcLaurin said he would be meeting with representatives from the Vail Valley Consolidated Water Districf this week regarding interest in a joint employee housing project on some lots owned by the district. Rob Ford suggested inviting members of the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board to upcoming meetings to learn more about their work. Kevin Foley asked for clarification regarding the future of the volleyball courts at Golden Peak. He was told the courts are not part of the redevelopment plan presented by Vail Associates. However, the Vail Recreation District is exploring the possibility of relocating the courts to the east side of the soccer field. . Sybill Navas said she had received an invitation to join the board of the Vail Valley Arts Council. # # # Q.DPCOMONG DISCUSSBOftN TOP9CS December 19 Work Session PEC/DRB Review Endowment for Community Health Discussion of text amendment to Section 18.24.050 Town Council Organizational/Policy Discussion (more) . Council Highlights/Add 3 December 19 Evening Meeting Second Reading of Golden Peak Ski Base Redevelopment First Reading of text amendment to Section 18.24.050 Appointment of Special Election Judges Town Council Call-Up of Serrano's/PEC Decision No Council Meetings December 26 January 2 Work Session Site Visit, Vail Athletic Club SDD January 2 Evening Meeting Second Reading text amendment to Section 18.24.050 Resolution re: Posting of Public Meetings First Reading Vail Athletic Club Major SDD Amendment L 1'-- . C3(tic:c ul llic I{tizrci oF (:c>iinni :%icini•rs 1=aVir. (:ciuncy Building (970) 328-3605 1'.( Ijox 850 1'ax: (970) 318-7107 500 I1madw.1y rl )1): (970) 328-8797 i liay;le, (..uloradu R 16 i I(lASO M EAAGLE CO Y, COLORADO FAMORANDUM 'lrce Town og Avon Town of Basalg Town of Eag9e Town of Gypsum _ Town of Menttam Town of Red Cliff Town of Viu'l Beaver Creek Resort Assn. FROMo Jaane Deane9 Ad8ninis4rative Assisfan4 (I . . DATEe Decernbcr 14, 1995 RE: Rcg eonal Transportataon Authori4y Itesmlutiore Oea Jauly 11, 1995 Eagtc County approvcd Resolution 95-79 Bstablishing the RegionaY Transportation Systean Authoritgr. T}de rasolution stated that, dt such time as 4he ballot question asking the votors Bo approve.& countywrede transportataon sales tax is approvcd by thc voters of Eag9c Coaantg? the Board shall adop4 a resolution whech officially ostablishes the Regianal Teanspoatation System Au4horifiy, Pursuang to 29-1- 201 et. seq., C.R.S. Eagle Couuntgr ns wow preparing the aaew aesogiataon and we aee asking that each group gepresen4ed on the authoritgr check over the membegs and alternates listed below. If yoaa ffaave ariy additioas, changes oa corrections, please call tne at 328-8605 before Frnday, I?ecember 22. hOlABERS: AY,TERNATES: Toain Hines-'d'ornn of Avon Rar.ha8d Caanes-Town of Avoaa . Keant Muellleff-Town of BasalY Duane Zggle¢-Town of Eagle Chris Es4cs-Town af Grypsaapn Jcff Shroll-Town of Gypsaam Mkc G$19$gher-Tmvan of Rh[ieutum L.aery S4one-T'own of Mintuxaa VDcYoP CiSneY05-TOfR/i1 Of Red Ciflff Rarbara Domier-'8'orwn of Red Clnff Kevin Fvlegr-Tawn of Vaal Kcaag Myegs=BCSVeS CTeCk ReSOPt ASSEI. 7acgnes Johnson-Eagle Caurbty George Roussos-Eagto Coun4y RECEfiVEU UtL I J ~e o ~o/oP~e UTILITIES DEPARTMERIT Administration ~ 1470 South Havana Street Aurora, Colorado 80012 December 6, 1995 303/695-7370 Dear West Slope/liRountain Resident: On IDecember ll and 12, 1995, the Aurora and Colorado Springs City Councils are expected to authorize modified filings on what we now call the Eagle River Conjunctive [Jse Project. The Project promises to be more beneficial to the west slope and the environment as well as the cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs. It is an outgrowth of studies and dialogue by front range and west slope water users warking together as the Eagle River Assembly in recent years. One Assembly objective was to study water project altematives for the cities that would be more beneficial to the west slope than Homestake II. That led us to what amounts to changes in the Homestake decrees and changes in the 1988 filings that the cities made in the Camp Hale area. Objectors to Homestake II and Iron Mountain Dam urged us to look at groundwater in Camp Hale and smaller reseivoirs. Eagle I'ark was rich in wetlands before it was drained by the Army to create Camp Hale for traming the lOth Mountain I)ivision during World War U. We believe we can restore some of those wetlands while retaining the area as a memorial to the lOth. Eagle River Conjunctive Use Project is an altemative to Homestake H. It does not impact Holy Cross V1/ildemess Area. Features include Blodgett Reservoir on Homestake Creek above the Eagle River, which may hold up to 30,00 acre-feet, Eagle Park Aquifer below Camp Hale, a well filed, and different water intakes in the area. The Eagle River Conjunctive Use 1'roject aIlows use of project waters in the Eagle and Colorado River Basins, conveyance to Aurora and Colorado Springs, restoration of wetlands and a range of other benefits. In additional to the coordination between features of this project, the Conjunctive Use Project can work effectively with local projects both built and proposed. We anticipate ea-tensive study and continued dialogue aimed at mutual benefit following the filing. A summary of the filing is enclosed. Please contact me or Doug ICemper, our VVater Resource Manager, at 695-7370 if you have questions. Otherwise, we will keep you informed. Yours truly, To C'rriswold I)irector of LTtilities enc. tl 6 0 EA(~'uL~ ~~~R CON.~~CTIVE USE PROJECT SUIlHffiHIlflaIl'y This project represents an alternative to the Cities (Aurora and Colorado Springs) 1988 groundwater filings and altemative points of diversion to the Homestake B project. As compared with the single plupose ofHomestake I and II of water for the front range cities, the filing for altemative points of diversion also allows for a range of uses in the Colorado River Basin. 1VIam features ofthis modified version are Blodgett Reservoir on Homestake Creek above the Eagle River, Eagle Park Aquifer Enlargement beneath Camp Hale, a well field in the aquifer and some stream mtakes m the general area. The concept is to mTnimize surface disturbance and avoid the Holy Cross Wilderness Area while providing sufficient water for the Cities, to restore historic wetlands, provide augmentation water for the Eagle River and improve fisheries. The water could also be used m.the Eagle and Colorado River basins for snowmaking, recreation, wildlife and domestic purposes. Further studies will be conducted and may result in modification of some features and elimiuation of others. The studies will also determine average annual yield, which is expected to be comparable to previous altematives. FIRST CLAIM. Blodgett Reservoir, up to 30,000 acre-feet of surface storage on Homestake Creek just above the Eagle River. The water would be used to create wetlands in the 1,450-acre Camp Hale area and replenish the aquifer, and for diversion directly to the front range, and for a range of uses in the Colorado River Basin. SECOND CLAIM. Eagle Park Aquifer Enlargement. Enlarges previous claims by the Cities to approximately 90,000 acre-feet beneath Camp Hale. Vdater would be pumped from the aquifer and replenished through infihration of surface water mcluding surface storage and if needed, through deep well injection. Water to the front range would be delivered by pipeline through the rail tunnel beneath Tennessee Pass or through other routes including one up the Homestake Valley to Homestake Reservoir. TH[W CLAIM. Eagle Park Aquifer Well Field, First Enlargement. Iprovides for approximately 20 wells some 700 feet deep pumping at a rate near 7 cubic feet per second (cfs) in the field above the Eagle Park Aquifer. FOURTH CLAIM. Homestake Creek Intake. An intake of 400 cfs approximately two miles above the junction of Homestake Creek and the Eagle River. The intake would divert water for the Eagle I'ark Reservoir below Camp Hale and is an altemative to Blodgett Reservoir and the Eagle River Intake (sixth claim). Only on of the three would be built. FTFTH CLAIM. Turkey Creek Intake. A 200 cfs intake located about 1,000 feet above Red Cliff would deliver water to Eagle Park Reservoir. It is an altemative to Eagle River Intake. (over please) ~ e f ~ SIXTH CLAIM. Eagle River Intake. A 600 cfs intake on the Eagle River below the confluence with Homestake Creek. It would deliver water to Eagle Park and is an altemative to the Turkey an Homestake Creek Intakes. SEVENTH CLAIM. Eagle - Cross Tunnel and 1'ipeline. Would divert water by gravity fram Fall Creek (250 cfs) and Peterson Creek (100 cfs) to Blodgett Reservoir, directly to the Front Range or to Eagle Park Reservoir, First Enlargement. . Water from Cross Creek (450 cfs) would be diverted at a point below Holy Cross Wilderness and pumped to the terminus of the gravity tunnel. EIGH'T CLAIM. Homestake Conduit. Moves some of the Homestake decrees to the Blodgett site. NINTH CLAIM. Exchange. Provides for release of water from the aquifer to the Eagle River and the diversion of water into Blodgett. TENTH CLAIM. Exchange. Provides for the release of water from Blodgett and the diversion of water to Camp Hale. Can also release water from Homestake Reservoir, pump back and divert to Camp Hale. ELEVENTH AND TWELF'TH CLAIM. Augmentation and exchange. Provides for the non-injury of water rights of others by allowing augmentation and exchange. PEC EB VED DEC 13 DECEMBER 1995 : ~ . . . . .4._., . ~ UIN: S.a . ~•..•~A~ti . : N ~ k..., l A Q • 1 • . 1 I City / County Govemmental Officials Mass tranSit tax B IlCllJded W~t~1 I COUn ty t ; ;:<><::~:<:> Effective Jan. 1,1996 the mass iransit tax for Summit and Pitkin counties will be !:!';;'.<:;:::;i::: re rted with the coun tax in the .~CNTY S„ column of the DR C m' Po h' /MT 0100 o bmed Sales TR ax eturn. countY taxrate ~ will' The nc rease bY 0.5 Per ' 1 cent to mc ude the mass i trans ttaz. The DePartment of Reve nue,s comPuter Y stem s will auto matically cr edi t the tax to the , < `'~:~7`~~;'` arad mass tr3ni s t acco.u?t s. co~~ .o ~ Ra . , ~ law Pi ~ tkin 3 % .S% 3.5% ~3XP~ Ll~ P1~QIL (lIl Ba.S31C) Z~ ~IO .S~IO L.S~IO ~~s1i~ee3rriiii~:fi~gds;traiis=:;:;' Summit 2% .5% 2.5% r~eu::o"::<.;';.. ~da~a tt?::::> Im ro er vehicle0 T~:~~O ud0 ~t verifications p p re BJhen auditors r uest verification of 9istration :~s : :~ii:i~:: tl~iur~; ~1 >>:<:<:;:: g sales and i c arette taxes remi tted b the 3~ y Investi adons azeunderwa concernin Colorado De artment of Revenue, the fol- g y g P ~ ~e~: ez€~d.~a ~re improper registration of vehicles, includ- o 'delin 1 winS ~ es should be used: ~:a<: <'; . .~ing registering a vehicle out of the Air '~riveatti~::;::: 1. ARake a separate request for each Pro area to evade emissions r uire- : type of tax. Address sales tax ~uests w ~ ~ tun~ei:;6!;T~ie?n~~iei~::tiero:;ys:;::::: ments. Cases also involve registering the > ttheCmrlcy I.opea, Department of Revenue, vehicle in a countY with lower tax raees to Busin ess Tax Acco untin 1 375 Sh erman Ag, ts.. avoid a' aP~~ o'ate taxes. Felon >St., Room 188, Denver, CO 80261. p~g y charges may result from these invesriga- A ddre i ss c arette tax uests to lena C g ;nairs 2~ ~ eaSe+d?~v'~ C~1ge. . , ~ tions. P Schaefer, Tax Accounting,1375 Sherman Vehicles must be registered in the coun- ~St., Room 286, Denver, CO. 80261. ty where the vehicle owner resides. 2. List the figures bY mon t h, as s hown ;;;::<.;::~~caco.r e~o . ' ess: : inyourrecords, rather than suPPiYu?g onlY ~rOC;>.;;;>fihen~~,uf the - total fi~es r'or th e y ear. y S ' Ele ion ct s brin9 ta x ; ether ou want the fi f0r filin S~ptem~:~,~fl~ ta~~pa~~rs ~ere;wh Y ~S g iail~i~' periods of a certain year or for the months ehan @S tO SO117 e al'@as be: . 2: You actually received the money. ;:ne~v;E~T:; .'.pi~'~ R .-J_ etailers should note chan es in sales Reclue g sts f r hig o h waY users moneY oran~ g..:.:.. F.~paaon~?ca~;the; , should be directed to: State Treasurer and/or use tax rates effecdve Jan. l in cities >;Pctfli~i';:; > .ie~..(3~'3) State Cphto and counties around the state. The c hanges >:::::~:~.5;»:>~;:::;;:>;:::?`Y' i 1 B " uildui ;~eq eSt;rh~ }3R ~7~~: :;:;:<...::.:<.: g, Room 14 0> Den- are the result of elections held Nov. 7. ver, C O 80230. Some areas will see new taxes while experience increases or de- City & County Tax EFwT sm, creothersases in will tax rates. Transrr~ission Dates Cify & County Coniroctions a pub/khed qusrtarly and meiled to eity end oounry govemmentel oJficials. Questions end commenLS ere welcame and shouW tre Electronic Funds 'fransfer (EFI') of taxes to lacal governments will occur on -rro: c1tYa coUnrYco,v,ecww, Cob„adaDepe,r,mr l~onday, Dec, 11, ~Vedmesday, Jan. 10 and Friday, Feb. 9. If your office is receiving o' nue, Room242a 1375Shemren St, o~,~; co. payrments by mail you may want to change to the EFT method for faster payment. For ~ecutive Ed'Kor, Dorothy Depulst more information contact Corky Upez, Taxpayer Service, (303) 866-4359. fddor, TerrlUvingeton ~ Maier Vehicle fivies • • • De artment of Revenue Director Renn P y Fagan has appointed I.arry Huls director of the Division of Racing Events. Huls moved ¦ A11 licensed Colorado trailer dealers are asked to notify the Nlotor Vehicle from his position as deputy director of the Dealer Board when they acquire a new franchise. They should also ensure that Colorado Motor Vehicle Division on Aug. 1. the manufacturer has a valid Colorado manufacturer's license. Even out-of- Huls, who spent 19 yeazs with the Motor state manufacturers must have a Colorado license if their vehicles are sold in Vehicle Division, became deputy director in Colorado. chazge of vehicle services in 1987. He fre- ¦ Areport filed withalocal law enforcementagencymaynotbe enoughwhen quently served as Motor Vehicle's liaison with drivers are involved in a traffic accident. Motor vehicle owners/operators are the state legislature and worked closely with required by law to report an accident to the Motor Vehicle Division within 10 the state's county clerks. days after the incident when a person is killed or injured, or when more than $1,000 property damage to the property of any one person is involved. The a~ report form, "State of Colorado Report of Motor Vehicle Accident" (DR 2301), Effective Nov. 30, Ivan Krueger Tax Ac- is available from any law enforcement agency or at Colorado Driver License counting Assistant Supervisor and former City offices azound the state. Failure to file the report could result in suspension of and County Support Unit member, has retired. driving privileges. Ivan was one of the fust members of the City ¦ As of September 29, 1995, Colorado has 2,537 licensed motor vehicle andCountySupportUnitestablishedtoprovide dealers, according to the Dealer Services Secaon. department assistance andinformation to cities Franchised New Vehicle Dealers 666 and counties. He was also responsible for developing the form DR 0026 which is used as Used VehiCle Dealers 1,506 a receipt to prove taxes were collected on Wholesalel5 359 motor vehicle leases. Wholesale Auctions 6 Active Salespeople 7,553 A fast way to income New driver record system links tax forms is here C o I o r ad o t o ot h e r s t at e s' re co rd s There's a faster way to get Colo:rado income When an out-of-stater moves to Colorado and wants to get a Colorado driver's license, tax forms rather than waiting for thiem to arrive the state wants to know if that person has been a problem driver in other jurisdictions. A in the mail or picking them up at a forms site. new computer system at driver's license offices statewide is improving DOR's ability to Dial up the DORElectronicInfortnation Bulle- detect potential driving problems with new residents. tin Boazd or the Govemor's Home Page on the Intemet. Under the previous computer system, a new resident received a license at a driver's The DOR electronic bulletin board system license office. A chP„ck of the driver's record occurred overnight If the driver was found has been open for business since May 1. All to be under restrair?t in another state, Colorado had to send the driver a letter requesting 1994 income tax booklets and instruccions were the return of the license. The letter also directed the driver to contact the other state to put on the BBS. The 1995 booklets will be clear that state's res¢rair?t action. Then the driver could meet Colorado requirements and available in November. receive another license. The old system was not always current, and in some cases, Use the communications softwaze of your Driver Control personnel had to make long-distance calls to other states to get information. choice to connect to the DOR BB S. ThenewNationalDriverRegister-ProblemDriverPointerSystemcontainsnationwide 0 BBSTelephoneNuanber:(303)866-2600 information on problem drivers. Driver examiners will immediately know of actions • Modem: 9,600 Baud, external modem taken in other states against a Colora,do driver license applicant. Additionally, other states recommended will be able to check on the records of drivers who move from Colorado. • Modem Settings: 14,400 BPS (birs per second) Updated Colorado sales/use tax ratPis 0 Communication Settings: No Parity, 8 8its, i stop Bit publicatnon avglaUle twice a pear Formoreinformationaboutthebulletinboazd and to obtain a brochure about how to use it, call "Colorado Sates/CTse Taz Rates" (DRP 1002), published 7anuary 1 and July 1 each year, lists the DOR Electronic Information BBS Help taz rates and ezemprion information for state-collected cities and counties; rates and telephone Line at (303) 866-2386. numbers for home rule cities; taz rates and informarion for the Regional Transportation District; Another method of obtaining tax forms and Scientific and Cultural'Facilities District; Metropolitan Baseball Stadium District; Gounty information is the State of Colorado Gover- Lodging Taz; Local Improvement District Tax; Mass Transit District Tax and Short-term Rental nor's Home Page on the Internet. The Home Tax. To order the publication by mail, contact the DOR Forms Hotline, (303) 534-1408. Page offers informarion on several state agen- By computer and modem, dial up the DOR Electronic Information Bulletin Board at (303) 866- cies, including the Department of Revenue. 2600. TheIntemetaddressishttp://www.state.co.us Q RECEIdED Oft-C 1 3 10 ~ X C • G~c.d-~,c,~ VaiLVAUJEr ~ FOUNDA'I70N Providing leadership iri aflrletic, edircatiorra! - and ctdtrrrnl erxleavors to eulvance and srrstaiu the qunlity offije i» ~ rhe uarl uoney December 11, 1995 Board af Directors 1'residcid Gcrald R. Fori hobcri fi. 13an-ett l.eon D. Blaclc Carulvn S. Blount Dear BOb, . A9arlcnc I.. 13u11 . Craig M. Cognt _.i1°nes «`rry cr;"d`i°`k I have moved from the Institute over to the ~ i.~ek- cro:b,- ,a„drew n;d,. Foundation where I am responsible for new - Benian~~~i Duke..ir. programming in the area of Education e The f irst program will be a Salon Series this Winter. !olin G,irnsc%~ c;«>r,;e N.c;uot. ir. John Garnsey, Elizabeth Slifer and I would like ~Gilbert R. Giordano t0 invite y011 t0 jOlll L1S e ~ Pepi Grani;hamuncr s'e°e N. `'`''"r Alanha I lead We will be discussing ideas in the Salons and Wiui;,,,, i.H,.bi bringing the Professors into the local schools El:~ine W. reitoi; the next day e We hope to provide provacative - Ja`k K""p programming to the community and bring talented I le"ry R Kr'vis Pit2hugh Scou, li'mrrrhrs Professors into our schools e Your comments and nrci,:iel s. si,an„o„ support would be greatly appreciated as we . R°d°e,' S'irel investigate these new programs e oscar ]r'',ing John Garnscv - Presidont ' Frienilstjb"trrl Happ Holidays, / l~ 1989 1 V`"dd Alp"n`'Ski Claudia Dulude Chnmpiorskips. .-1F_Y I1"ir6l Furnnt _ ' - ,9urerirmi Ski Cfassrr ~ FlSAlpiur. IVorld Qrp Vni/ luternalrmtnf Strutntrr uf Uancn . Grrald R. Fnrd AmpL rllicr. tcr ~ Ftr nd jm' thr Ftrf nrr HrnnGlumer.-itcards ton:i Sclrulmsliips 1994 II'in'!d lllnrntfnin ~ I;ike Cliamprrnrships \ I999 IPiwld.9lpinc ?~d~S ~ ~ e'^'~d~-~ S?;i Chnnrpiouslrips P.O. Box 309 ' Vail, Colorado 81658 97(1949-1999 ~ Fax 970-949-9265 , A Colorado 501 (c) (3) • Noriprofit Corposation ~ ' -y~,~ 31r jI ,L ~"~°°t'SR~r iy , _ {N .A _ ~ ~1, V~~ • , - - 1 - . , . . - . !w . - ~I~ ~t~ st s;~_3.. , .ry _i - ' . Q><y~ - .I k~ -i ..f°,•Y'~ ' - #w 4 ~r - ^..}i i, . Y~, ' ntP, a . ''c' - •,A: jy y' ' _ ' •~~~~A~ y~~/~--~''._7 :~?,"7 ~1 . Y~• " uw.w~ ~ I~~~Z.M~-~;' - M!'"' ~,1~1~.?~~~ _ ~+y ra lO~.l~ _ ~ + ''~~~~p ~~i~~•S.1f],v ~ ~ k d - _ • ' ` ~ n. f 1' ~ ~~J~1.y~,!~lY~y~' Y ie wp~tF~jyy~ ~ "y F~L6R'`,i.,'.~.~'•h vatI~l;~ (1 F ~YI'T' _ ~ y~~~{/ y¦ 'F'~ ~ ¢y /],~gy~ ~ry~i,y '~fa ~n.a,J~'/y~~/.~" ~ ~ i~: t ,C. ~ 3ir ? v 'l • i6~F~~3~~~ ~11f~ 6~JiY"'CV~Y~~i~1sT/ W~L~~~~~~~- 6_.' _ b~ Y ~ - f~ ~ T,T ' ~'~p{i~ , t~»~ ii1'~-~'i1~1~ . ~ _ s : ~_r ,~•~t~~V~~~ tiY~~~~,~~' '~y;~~~ ~ ~ f ii ~ . {I.KR++Yir;~~~At).MLWi i.~~..j~1~"y~.~z r ~ P~VVk ) 9~*'Yid { W ~ ` I~ . • . , ' . . . . . n - ~~~r~vV 29I n UrAv&'~~ '.tV(!tj r-'s'C.'.`'~y,p~.•~~~.?`~~"a~-1fwT~t ~ _ • . : , a~ ~Whut-Bi'L"~~~ itid' ~instl: ; '~~a~:'~?~~.~" ~ - 97~4 i'i~F+'! ' (C~'S . ~ ~ I~ . ~':l~~G~f~~l~~~ry_"~.~ Y ~ ~ a , ~ _ . ~ ' , a '~~f. ~ '~"~h~f ; ~ k j ~ . ~#,LgisAk E~?.~~Ai~~~ and~~~~g 'r~ .1'r as ¦ ' ~ i ~ ~x - ~ ~ f _ ~al ~ . _ '~a , n _.~~!k ~ ~ . • r Ei~.» ~~~~)d -.~seli, ~ 4 . { s J,~ i[,~,~.~ q. .p'.Y ry r ' z ~ '~LL " ~ ;F, 5 K{J Y'~+~~J'?f~~VJ~~4`~~~~re1~W~~~ ~ . P~ ~ lN~i' E~ ~'?i~~~- ~r, ~ • _ AU ~w.ls.;'e:~~~'~~~§.&gS~~°~~•iw~.~}"9ad..5 '~.'.e~ ~ ' ~ ' a ~ • ' _ , ! . ,4~ ~r~r ~ ~ , ~5:0~3 -p~'~',~~don` ~ ft~. ^~~''y' - ' ~T~ ~v~~~Y 7 F~~1~~d~ft, t~~.at 9~~~~'9~/u~ ~,"t ',qT • ' _3•~, • ~ c ~V* ~ • i . , . .r ~ ~ ~ . . _ } ~~li~~',' ~ ~ , ~ fIa ~ P • P, sly ,zJ' ~~`i aNf . .ai' .~1~n ~ _ ~ 6 • _ • • j p ! " ~ ' ~ . ~ F~:, x~y. 4~1 h ~ i v . • y ~ : ~ ~ . i ~ s r f H : , / y s+q , }r December 1995 Dear. Fellow Coloradan: The Nvvember 4 statewide Smart Growth and Development Summit brought ver 800 indivtduals partici- together more than 800 citiuns from across the state who shared t}ieir concerns and their ` pated in the second ' visions For Colorado. It was a result oFa year of extraordinary work where Coloradans statewide summit on Smart' channe(ed the hopes and dreams they have for their communities inco local and regional Growth and Develo ment held in visions and action plans to address growth issues. P • • - The summit allowed us to explore.:fogethet recommendauons idenufied by the Denver. on November 4. Participants . Interregional Council and the sixissues task forces-recomm,endations were revieyved ai included local elected and appointed Fall regional growth.meetings,around~the state prior to being.presented at the summit offiCials, concerned cicizens, - The 11 regions as well as business agricultural,-envtronmental, governmental and com- , landowners, business people; envi-. muniry interests were represented on>the couricil an d che tsk forces ronmentalists and others. The focus The slide presentatio~ given by the 11 state regions at the ~summit, whicli oudined' _ ' I of the summit was two-fold: a) view the unique qualiues of cheir areas as.wcll as theic vtsioris for the future;'was veryimpres- . " and listen to re ional visions for. sive and underscored chat Colorado is truly a speczal.place While eacfi,of che>regions .9 _ have unique concerns and qualities, there are several-themes.:and issues common to each future communiry development, of chem and, 6) evaluate and comment upon For example, citizens and their regions consiscently idencified,transportation as a'pri- 76 draft solutions recommended by onry: On che scate level, action already:has:.been taken-to, address this cr?tical issue I have the Interregional Council (IRC) S , appointed a.Blue Riblion Panel on Transpoitation that will explore exisun an g d necessary relatin to smart rowth and devel- resourccs to meet our state's cransporiaaon needs. g g `We still have a tremendous amounrof work aliead of us. Since January and the firsi opment issues affecting the state. stateivide summlt, we've taid the essentia? gioundwork in identifying priorities and the rec- After an introduction by Gover- ommended action that will:get this workdone. Weve been successful in bringing cogether noi Romei, representatives, from'each communities, state arid local government and vanous organizations"and,incerests to create, : . of the 11 regions gave a slicle Presen-.- proteci;and enhance, the Colorado we want to leave for our children and grandchildren. tation depiCting vtslons for Col- On the state level, departments are worlung with_communines in creating a:legisla- ' ' orado's future. Slides of ristine ti_ ve package to be;brought before the:General Assembly dnring,the 1996Iegislaiive ses- - p mountain vistas that exem li wh sion. I already have issued an execuuve;'order direcung that,state agencies align<Eheir plans P~ y • _ with regional visions. Thatrparnculaz-execuuve order•is`the firse in a series I plan to issue- Coloradans wan[ to live-here-and _ through my work wich °stafe departinents members of the Incercegional Council and the why others want to move here were six task forces-Agriculture; Communiues; Land Use and Governatice; Economic Vita1= jwxtaposed with pictures of makeshift iry/Affordable Housing, Transportauon a nd Aii Qualiry and Natural Resources and dwellings: Slides of diverse"recre- s. Environment-to complemenrlocal:pians.and:visions~.::. ' ` - ° - ational o ortunities contrasted Citizen pazticipation will continue to 6e most critical co this effort. Whether its - pp through voting on growth-related ballot issues, advocating for proposed legislation or those of congested highways and • working in cooperation with local organizations and governments, Colorado's fiicure is in poor air qualiry. Scenes oF our valued our hands and now is the dn,e co aec. agricultural lands and heritage aieas I want to thank all of you.who participated in the November summit and other . C{emonstrated the great potential for smart growth activities and encourage your continued involvement wich this exciting and expanding our economy tllrougflout important endeavor. the state, while keeping in mind _ Sincerely, those things we value the most. The slide presentation showed the posi- tive and the negative aspects of Roy . Romer Governor - continued on page 3 A - RMALA B.1 E},. . ~ RE01 L4'SL COUNCHL' ' . ~~~OM...:' EN.-0 ATHONS ~ ~ ~ ' • Input gained from discussions at the summit was presented.to the Interregional Council at a meeting on November 5. After lengthy debate, the council voted to incorporate.some changes, which included moving two recommendations into the top priority category. The final draft document has 74 recommendations, 18 of which are considered priority items. Of the 74, 23 require legislative action, five recommend executive , orders and 46 suggest poliry and/or administrative changes that can be implemented at the state or local level. The 18 priority action items are: 1D Appoint a blue ri66on panel to develop strategies to meet the state's future-transportation, needs; M Convene a statewide panel to analyze public sector fiscal poliry alternatives and develop an action plan . for consideration by the General Assembly; - ' - " . 3) Reexamine the state Enterprise Zone policy; 4D Enact enabling legislation which permits counties to approve or disapprove the subdivision of lands into parcels of 35 or more acres with review; SD Improve transportation and comprehensive planning in all communities across the state; - GD Increase support and incentives to expand protection of soil, water, vegetation and wildlife on agricul- tural lands; _ `a'~ Protect water supplies for highly producuve lands; BD Reform State Land Board poliry to be consistent with state and locaf community priorities; _ OD Enact enabling legislation which clearly provides for the local option to impose school impact fees;- - 10) Adopt enabling-legislation which establishes the authoriry_of local governments to employ the transfer and/oi purchase of development rights; ^ 9 q Enact legislation that creates a comprehensive telecommunications policy for Colorado;: 12D Include air qualiry protection as a component of all "smart growth"; - 1 M The Governor should request that major local government organizations, in consultation .with other, . interested groups as identified by the Governor, convene a panel to consider mechanisms to resolve . problems related to local government boundary changes, the creation of new units of local govern- ment,, and development-related disputes; - " - Amend-statutes to clarify the agricultural land classification for properry tax purposes; 161 Develop a system of performance standards/benchmarks; - ~6) The Governor should issue an executive order directing state plans to be aligned with local plans when- ever possible; - ~I G') Amend state enabling statutes for master planning to include specific reference to afforda6le housing, _ so that local governments can establish plans and administrative policies focused on incentives to encourage developers to provide a wide mix of housing types; and, 18) The Governor and legislature should convene a state education action coalition. For a complete set of rhe Interregional Council recommendations, call the Smart Growth & Develop- ment hotline at 1-800-899-4769 or (303) 866-2817. . . 13~ IJ ? o o . ~~~~~~~3~9 . _ In the breakout sessions, participants were asked for input on how to' implement the Interregional Council's recommendations.-Each recommenda- - Nearly half of those - _ - tion will fleed action at one or more levels of government: a) execuhve; b) leg= who attended the . - , - ; islative, and c) administrative. A coordinating agenry and contact person has . November been assigned to manage implementation. They are: summit 5 r' Covetre9or's Offace-education & eXecutive orders " stepped for- ward to Contact: Dlun ougYoung, (303) 866-2155 vo , teer to help Otffifoce of Busoness Deve8opBnGn't-economic development, enter- , - ~prise zones & benchmarks implement specific , - ` recommendations. _ Contact.• Greg Diamond, (303) 892-3840 : . Summit participants. also iden-, -~epartment of AgrocuBta9mb -agriculture & opea space- - - tified actions individuals can ~ Contact.• David Carlson, (303) 239-4100 take to continue building the _ DD el~artmo?nt of L~cag A$ffaursJ- citizens' movement that will Division of Local Government-land use & governance help make Smart Growth and Contact: Charlie Unseld & Carolyn Misch, (303) 866-2156 - Development a lasting realiry. _ Division of Housing-affordable housing = These ideas will be pub- Contact: Pat Coyle, (303) 866-2033 lished in a Citizens'Action Community Partnership Office-community and citizen participation Guide for Smart Growth and->~ Contact.~T. Michael Smith, (303) 866-4900 , . Development early next year. ~eparPtmenft of kn]a$uira0 ResoumeS--environment, water, air qualiry The guide will provide infor- ~ & open space mation on how individuals can_ Contact. Steve Norris & Kathy Kanda, (303) 866-3311 get involved at the community? Def~DaF~tr~eti~t ofif P48bgoc fr3ea9t~t ~ L~tP~~9o~l~t~e~F?t--environmental regional and statewide level'._- _ ~ ~ Call the Action Center for qualiry _ more information. - Contuct: Jackie Berardini, (303) 692-3099 - - ~~pa9"$mtLP8f~ ~f TlT'an5~~rta{kBoW-transportation & air quality - ' Contact.• Bill Stringfellow, (303) 757=9011_ - Individuals who vorunteered at the summit to help with implementation •for specific recommendations will be contacted by the appropriate agenry. If- ~~eruoew you are interested in volunteering and are familiar with the 74 recommenda-. -continued from page 1.: . tions, please call the appropriate individual listed above. If you would like more information or a copy of the recommendations, please call 1-800-899-GROVV Colorado's developing economy, _ (4769), or (303) 866-2817. which are the crux of each region's. concerns. , - The morning assembly was fol- ` lowed by break-out sessions in the Mft~ ` ~H afternoon, where participants were ' divided into groups of 10 and asked Implementauon' hasalready b'egun on two action items : to discuss the IRC's recommenda- No 1 u s. n6bon paneQ tD°anSpo10.tatBow=-appointed tions. Each group was first charged by Governor on Nov 14, began wa.rk on~I~Tov 17 (report due ._with evaluating the 16 prioriry IRC in 90 days} , recommendations and-then discussed No 16 C~ec~{f'~8@!e:,:oQ"de&' oC~1 ~Q9gn084~ other items of their choice of the ~~~~tp Bae~~-executive order was issued at the Conelu.sion remaining 60. of Nov. 4 summit Finally, participants volunteered . to help implement many of the IRC ; ~ • : , recommendations. ~ Based on requests from summit participants, the Gov- ernor's Office is developing a video of the re ional visions g - .s~x ~ ~~+?'x~ r ~i.W'~ slide show and corresponding scripts, which will be available at the first of the year. ; ~ • _ Z F~~;~°~~~~' ~ % zv ~,~i CL ~C~~~ CQQ ~~1 - t ~ ~ j~ b ' • ; 4 4.. ' i y. , 5 Citizens can send comments and ideas to the Smart Growth.Acaon f - b ~ Center at the followingemail address=- ~ ~.6~We6'dbtick~cs~on~$ `Smarr growth` and developmenr informauon can be obtauied on the ' . . Internet through:the woildwide web at the followcng ad~ess- ' ~ - duovc9u/Smar°FGrolkMa~ntpageolht SI~RT GROWT~ ~CTION CENT]ER: (303) 866-2817 or 1-(800) 899-G-ROW (4769) , - ,r - prinurlon s. rerycledpaper SMART GROW'I'H AND DEVELOPMENT ACI'lON CENTER ~ - - Department of Local Affairs FIRST CI.ASS us PosrnGE -Centenriial Building, Room 5211" PAID 1313 Sherman Street DEt•rvEx, co -Denver, CO 80203 PERMIT #738 280000500 - - - - ` _ • . XC ~ Town Of Vail M5, Pamela A. Brandmeye Town Clerk C/Q Town of Vail 75 SouttEFro_n',~A~J t~o'd~ ~ ~ - Vail, Cfl 81657 ~ _ e ~V~Symposium 25th Anniversary rVA, I L 35thANNIVERSARY iirEAKER SE~ES . ,9.0 -,99s FRIDAY, DECEMBER 29, 1995 ~ auYa Zahri9 Co-Anchor, CBS TDaas Morning ~U~ . 66Election 199699 7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. ~ Hyatt Regency at Beaver Creek ~ $18.00 (members) • $20.00 (non-members) Includes steaming-hot breakfast buffet! Reservations strongly recommended. v T tions ~ Vail Symposium •"Providing a Pu6lic Forum" •(970) 476-0954 for reserva mnmmm~ ~ dd eg TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FOR WNIEDeATE RELEASE December 15, 1995 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information BUVLDDNG I~~RM5TS.9SSUED Blf TFBE TOWN OF !lA9L The following building permits have been issued by 4he Town of Vail Community Development Dept. for the period December 1 to December 14: . Kelley, 992 Ptarmigan Road, addition, $16,500, Brown-1/Volin Construction. 286 Bridge Street, Inc., 286 Bridge Street, bay window alteration, $4,000, Scharpf Construction. Pryde, 5032 Prima Court, remove interior wall, $3,500, Rusty Spike Enterprises. Village Center Association, 122 East Meadow Drive, elevator shafts, $1,200, A.T. Smith Corporation. Town of Vail, temporary tent, $6,000, Distinctive Tent Rentals. # # # RECYCLED PAPER 0 Q d dd e4 ~'Obl OF ~~~L . 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157• FOR IflflnflED9ATE RELEA5E December 15, 1995 Contact: Bob McLaurin, 479-2105 Vail Town Manager TOWN OF VAIL REGOGNBZES VETERAN iNOFiKER AND A NEWCOMIER AS ORGANIZAT@ON'S TOP EIIAPLOYEES (Vail)--Town of Vail employees have selected a veteran staff inember and a newcomer to receive the town's top employee recognition awards for 1995. Charlie Davis, a building inspector with 16 years of service to the town, was named employee of the year, while Ron Braden, information systems/communications manager since 1994, is supervisor of the year. The two were selected by their colleagues for outstanding service from among 18 nominations. Awards were presented at the town's holiday party, Dec. 8. Co-workers say Davis exemplifies the town's employee values through his motivation and positive attitude. As construction inspector for the town, Davis has won praise and respect from area contractors who have found him to be compassionate, rather than adversarial, in his ability to solve problems in the field. In addition to his.positive contact with the public, Davis also was recognized for contributions to his fellow employees, including a project to improve internal communications by using electronic mail to route daily construction schedule information to the staff. Davis began working (more) RECYCLEDPAPER 0 Employee Awards/Add 1 for the town in 1979 when he was hired as a snow.shoveler. After working as a maintenance worker and an equipment operator, he was named construction inspector in 1990 and was promoted to building inspector earlier this year. "What I've enjoyed most about the town is the family atmosphere around here," Davis said. "It makes coming to work enjoyable. How can I not give my all to an organization like this." Davis and his wife Robin have two children, Tony, 12, and Daryl, 4. Braden, the supervisor of the year, was recognized for extraordinary customer service, innovation and teamwork within the organization. Since coming to the town in 1994, Braden, along with computer technician Greg Raile, has made significant technologieal improvements. Those efficiencies have included installation of voice mail, electronic mail, a new computer system for the Police Department, Internet access and a new fiber optics network connecting the town's five buildings. Employees also value Braden's perseverance in keeping the new hardware running smoothly. An excerpt from his nomination reads: "I have left messages on Ron's voice mail at 4:50 p.m., expecting to hear back from him in the next day or so, only to find out he stayed late or came, in early and solved the problem." Braden says he's pleased with the recognition. "IYs a real honor to be chosen for this award," he said. "I've only been here for a relatively short period of time and the people in this organization are very supportive. It's a great place -towork:"-- Br-aden has nine years of experience in the communications field. Before joining the Town of Vail, he served as project engineer for Eagle Computer Systems in Eagle. The two winners each receive.a check for $500 from Town Manager Bob McLaurin. (more) 6 ' 4 t ~ Employee Awards/ Add 2 , Other 1995 nominees included: Christine Anderson, finance controller; Brenda Chesman, personnel assistant; Lorelei Donaldson, administrative secretary in Community Development; Dick Duran, fire chief; Greg Hall, engineer; Jim Jones, firefighter; Andy Knudtsen, housing coordinator; Jeff Layman, acting police chief; JacqueLovato, accounting technician; Linda Nioore, municipal court administrator; Annie Niurray, children's librarian; Greg Raile, computer technician; Bob Riggle, heavy equipment operator; Joe Russell, police detective sergeant; Corey Schmidt, police lieutenant; and Suzanne Silverthorn, community information officer. Nominations were evaluated in eight categories tied to the town's employee values. Those values are: respect the individual; recognize effort and achievement; communicate openly and honestly; encourage innovation and risk taking; commit to excellence in all we do; use teamwork to achieve results; manage our resources to serve the community of today and the future; and each take ownership for Vail's future. Also recognized last week were 13 employees who received five year awards with the town. They are: Jim Applegate, police officer; Becky Comroe, dispatcher; Lorelei Dondatdson, administrative secretary, Community Development; Terry Hall, bus driver; Andy Knudtsen, housing coordinator; iViatt Martinez, mechanic; Todd Oppenheimer, landscape architect/parks superintendent; Marlene Rivera, administrative municipal court clerk; Debbie-Roeland; executive secretary-wi#fi PubliaWorks;. Carmen Slagle, personnel analyst, Lori Stahlin, bus driver; Linda Vllolz, executive secretary, Police Department; and Sandy Yost, accounting technician. The town has a full time staff of 196 employees. # # # ~ . ~ RECE9VEO DEC -9 2 `7AILVALLEY • ' FOUNDATION Provirling leadership irt athletic, erlucatiortal and caltxrnl endeavors to enhance atid szrstaiit , ~ - the r~:~nlity of life iu . the Vail valley ' December 8, ~ 1995 ' Board of Directors - Pmsident Gerald R. Ford _ Mr. Bob 1VIcLaurin ~ Pobert E. 13an-etl Leon D. Blaclc Town of Vail , Carolyn S. [3lount Marlcne L. 13011 75 South Frontage Road Gaig M. Cogut, V~, 81657 Jnmes Bcrry Craddock - ]ack Crosby ~ Andrew'P. naly H. Benjamin Duke,]r. D@illP BOb:_ . Hany H. Prampton, II[ John Garnsey . ceorge N. ciuett.Jr. On beha]f of the Vail Valley Foundation, I would like to exterid a Gilbert R. Giordano Pepi Gramshanuner ~ personal thank you to you and the, Town of Vail for your support of 1995 , ste°e N. }'abe` M.u-tha Head Chevy Trucks International Ski Festival. ` ~ N'illiam Hybl - • , Elaine W. Kelton J~ck Kemp The beautiful weather, world clas's skiing competition, attendance and ~ Henry R. Kravis rit,.l,t,gl, scott. F,ne.,t„s overall enthusiasm of the crowds, all combined to make this year's event n9ichael S. Shannon Rodney F. Slifer a tremendous.success. As always, we would not be able to continually ~ , oScarTang bring events, such as the Chevy Trucks International Ski Festival, to the ~ - Vail Valley without the involvement and dedication b£ the Town of Vail. ~ Jolin Garnsey . . ~ I'resident ~ Thank you again for everything, it was truly appreciated. Friends ojTlail 1989 VVmld A1pine Ski Sincerely, ~ Clrmnpionshrps , , . i AF.1 Tl'orfd Forirm . Aiilericair Ski Clnssic ' F/SAlpnre.T-{lorld Grp ~ John arnsey Vail Gtfernational Pr~;5ju' n 4 . ~ Smnuner of Dance ~ ' Gerald R. Fnrd , pR~ltr Ainpkitlreater Fmrd for tlte Futare HornblowerAwards - aud Scholarslrips 19.94 FVorld Mornitaiu Bike Clrampinitships 1999 IVorlrlAlpiite , . Skr Clianrpioxships P.O. Box 309 , Vail, Colorado 81658 ~ • - 970-999-1999 Fax 970-949-9265 . . A Colorado 501 (c) (3) Nouprofit Corporation , ~ ~ ea e4 41 1! OD'G' N OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Off ce of the Town Manager Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 , December 18, 1995 Mr. George Russo Eagle County Engineer Post Office Box 850 Eagle, CO 81631 . . Re: CDOT Rail Feasibility Dear George: Pursuant to our discussion regazding the Colorado Department of Transportation Rail Feasibility Study, the Vail Town Council has authorized $1,000 to help fund the local match study. These funds will not be available until fiscal yeaz 1996. Please let me know how you wish to handle the distribution of these funds. We look forward to working with you and the Department of Trarisportation on this important study. Please feel free to call me at 479-2105 if you have questions. . Sincerely, . TOVVIV OF VAII. ' ~ Robert W. McLaurin Town Manager . RWIiR/aw. xc: Vail Town Council Eagle County Commissioners . RECXCLEDPAPER ~ ~ i~--- _ Fi:y~lc: (:.utuily l3i.uldinK 5(X) llrrradwaY PRESS RFLNEI4S E r.c ,iox Kso [:at:lv, Colondr, x 163 ! 0850 • (970j 128-8612 .r,-. I-,x: (970) a2K 7207 Ill'ecembGr 10, 1995 101); ~ ~7lf)) :i1A-K7.)7 ~~mediate Rei~~~ ~GLE (COtIA1TY, COLORADO .~.~Y HARDIANtv NAMFn EAru r C(1~ IY A121wINrS1•~AMR (aggc) Jim ]EIartanam is 1F.ag1e County's neov admanistrator. lElar¢mann acc;epted the job offeg from ghe Eagle Couney Conimf ssioners ovcr the weekcnd and tendered his resignaYion $oday as dircceor nf the adgnanistaative support didision at Orange Cmunty, Floricia. He searts his new job Ianuary 15. Hartmaran reccntly coordic2ted negotiaeions for a new S132 million coaanty courthouse in Orlatttdo, Florida. "With over forty elecc:ted officiaLs having an interese in the facili¢y, Jilh was resgomsible for sophastis:atec4 inter-ageni:y coorciination and superivr public relataoaes," said ccmn8y commission chapr .Dames Jolanson. "His successfial experietce working wittn other entetaes is a big plus as we c;cwntinue to try to wopk cqoperdtively in resolving eounty 1SSueS. Harhnann oversees five coeanty ciegdr.tments and adnaaiusters a$32 million operating budget and afivc-year capieal budget mo:e than $250 e?ti.llion. "He's goL lhe experaence axid d fiaanc he has the personality," said countg? conunissioaer George "Bud" Ga4es. pHe is frona a aeson-type community anci ehac knowlecige will help us,p Sd81d COIflIIty COIIIffiflSSflOIIeT .Vuhmette Phillips. "Our employees are dery comEobiable nn the situation eve haee cight novv. He has agreedl to work with department heaais, in the sxue maaner.," (Harwnm's gesume anl home numbeg available upon request hy contacting Jack ][aagslacfl at 328-8605) , - Development Review Team Community Development Large Conference Room Wednesday at 9v00 a.m. December 20, 1995 Attn: Greg Hall Susan Connelly Todd Oppenheimer Mike Mollica Terri Martinez Jim Curnutte Larry Pardee Russ Forrest Larry Grafel . Andy Knudtsen Sally Lorton Randy Stouder • Tom Sheely Lauren Waterton Holly McCutcheon George Ruther - ' Pam Brandmeyer Dan Stanek Fire Dept (fax #479-2176) Dominic Mauriello Fred Haslee UEVWSD (fax 476-4089) Staff Comm Dev Police Fire P.W. Landscapina Holly M. 1. Special Events / Business Licenses X X X X ' X GR 2. Theys Building Permits X X X GR 3. Dauphinais New P/S X X X FINAL COMMENTS ARE NEEDED OIV THE FOLLOWING: Staff Comm Dev Police Fire P.W. Landscaping RS 1. Ferguson X RS 2. Fallier X RS 3. Reeman/Randall X JC 4. Drisko X JC 5. Walton Duplex X ~ • GoEdeaa Peak Skn Base IRedevelopment • • ~