The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996-01-02 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session vAaL TowN couNciL Ei/ENING NIEE°TING TUESDAV,,9ANUARY2, 1996 7:30 P.M. BN TOV COUNC@L C9iAIVIBERS ' AGEYVDi4 1. CITiZEN PARTICIPATIOiV. 2. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of December 5 and 19, 1995. B. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1996, a resolution designating a public place within the Town of Vail for the posting of notice for public meetings of the Vail Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, Design Review Board, and other boards, commissions, and authorities of the Town of Vail. C. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance amending Section 18.24.050 (B) of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for eliminating any existing dwelling unit or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor in Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. 1 Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance, First Amendment to the Town of Vail Police and Fire Employees' Pension Plan. 4. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance amending Special Development District No. 30, The Vail Athletic Club, and amending the development plan in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. 5. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance for the regulation of traffic by the Town of Vail, Colorado, for the purpose of providing a system of traffic regulations consistent with state law and generafly conforming to similar regulations throughout the state and the nation; adopting by reference the 1995 edition of the "Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities"; repealing all ordinances in conflict therewith; and providing penalties for violation thereof. 6. Town Manager's Report. 7. Adjournment. NOll'E UPCOflflING fVIEETIiVG ST'ART TIIVIES BEL.OV1l: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) I I I I I I I THE NEXT VAIL 70WN COIYNCIL REGULAR WOFtIC SESSION WILL BE ON 7UESDAY, 9/9/96, BEGVNiVING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHa4M6ERS. THE FOLLOWIftlG Ve41L. 70WN COUNCIL REG99LAR !n/ORK SESSIOiV VI/ILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/16/96, BEGINtJING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VA1L TOVVIV COIINCIL REGUL,4R EVEPIING nIIEET1iVG lIUILL BIE ON 7UESDAY, 1/1696, BEGIIVNING AT 7:30 P.M. IiV TOV COUNCIL CHL1AlIBERS. IIIIIII Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. C: WG ENDA.TC VAIL TOWfV COUIVCIL EVENING MEETI~~ TUESDAY, .flA?NUARY 2, 1996 7:30 P.M. BN TOV COUNCBL CHAnflBERS ' AGEfVDA 7:30 P.M. 1. CiTIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:35 P.M. 2. Consent Agenda: , A. Approvaf of the Minutes for the meetings of December 5 and 19, 1995. B. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1996, a resolution designating a public place within the Town of Vail for the posting of notice for public meetings of the Vail Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, Design Review Board, and other boards, commissions, and authorities of the Town of Vail. C. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance amending Section 18.24.050 (B) of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for eliminating any existing dwelling unit or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor in Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. 7:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance, First Steve Thompson Amendment to the Town of Vail Police and Fire Employees' Pension Pfari. 7:55 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance amending Mike Mollica Special Development District No. 30, The Vail Athletic Club, and Michael Barclay amending the development plan in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipaf Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1996 on first reading. BACKGROUIVD RATIONALE: Please see the attached memorandum from the staff to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated December 11, 1995 and Exhibits A-F attached to that memorandum. STAFF RECOiVIMEIVDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1996 as presented. 8:25 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance for the Tom Moorhead regulation of traffic by the Town of Vail, Colorado, for the purpose of providing Buck Allen a system of traffic regulations consistent with state law and generally Greg Morrison conforming to similar regulations throughout the state and the nation; adopting by reference the 1995 edition of the "Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities"; repealing all ordinances in conflict therewith; and providing penalties for violation thereof. ACTIOIV REQUESTED OF COUIVCIL: Adopt Model Traffic Code as amended. BACKGROUND RATIOIVALE: The Model Traffic Code is intended to provide uniformity between the state's traffic faws and the various municipaf traffic codes. CDOT has prepared a 1995 revised edition of the Code, reflecting recodification of the vehicle and state traffic laws enacted by the State General Assembly. STAFF RECOMMENDAT101V: Pass Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996 on first reading. 8:35 P.M. 6. Town Manager's Report. 8:40 P.M. 7. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMBNG MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMA7E AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) I I I I I I I THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/9/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWIIVG VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/16/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. . THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY,, 1/16/96, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. fllllll Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. C:WGENDA.TCE ~ , 1 : DlESgGN REVl[EW BOARD AGENDA December 20, 1995 3:00 P.M. lPRO1f]ECT ORIENTATI[ON / ILUNCH 12:30 SdTlE VI5ITS 1:45 1. Brown - 1239 Westhaven Circle 2. Gray - 2672 Kinnickinnick Ct. 3. Dauphinais - 1875 West Gore Creek Drive 4. Mizner - 5030 Main Gore Drive South 5. Meal Ticket Cafe - 244 Wall Street 6: Oleson / Volinn - 3275 Katsos Ranch Road Driver: Randy 1. Meal Ticket Cafe " Standing rail for outdoor dining. RS 244 Wall Street/ One Vail Place Building Applicant: Julie Iverson and Kiendra Hoover MOTION: Alm SECOND: Borne VOTE: 5-0 . APPROV1ED WITlH][ CONDIT?ONS 2. Reeman/Randall - New single family residence. RS 2865 Snowberry Drive/Lot 2, Block 9, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: John Railton representing Clive Reeman and Louise Randall MOTION: Borne SECOND: Alm VOTE: 5-0 AlP1P][tOV]EdD WI'Il']E][ CONDIT8ON5 3. Gray - Dog run and fence. RS 2672 Kinnickinnick Ct./Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Intermoutain. Applicant: Harry Gray MOTION: Borne SECOND: Alm VOTE: 5-0 TABlLlED UN'g'I[lL JANUARY 3,1996 4. Innsbruck Meadows - Change to approved plans, Units 1& 3. GR 2892AIB and 2832 A, Kuiriickinnick Road Applicant: Bob Borne MOTION: Woldrich SECOND: Alm VOTE; 4-0-1 (Borrie) CONSIENT AlPPROV]ED t i 5. Oleson/Voliun Residences - Conceptual review of request to separate duplex units. GR 3275 Katsos Ranch Road / Lot 11, Block l, Vail Village 12th Filing Applicant: V.M. Donaldson, Architect for Oleson / Volinn MOTION: Borne SECOND: Alm VOTE: 5-0 DENIED . 5. Brown Duplex - Change to approved plans. GR 1239 Westhaven Circle/Lot 37, Glen Lyon Applicant: Sally Brainerd MOTION: Woldrich SECOND: Alm VOTE: 5-0 CONSENT APPROVED / window changes and meter enclosure . , 6. Sadler - Final review of a Primary/Secondary residence. GR 1950 Chamonix/I,ot 34, Buffher Creek Subdivision Applicant: June Sadler MOTION: SECOND` VOTE: TABLED - (prior to meeting) 7. Dauphinais - Conceptual review of Primary/Secondary residence. GR 1875 West Gore Creek Drive/Vail Village West #2 Applicant: Pat Dauphinais MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 8. Mizner - Conceptual review of a new single family residence. RS 5030 Main Gore Drive South/Lot 1, Vail Meadows Filing #1. Applicant: Duane Piper representing George and Joanne Mizner MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Mike Arnett Bob Borne Srent Alm Hans Woldrich Henry Pratt (PEC) 2 9 6. Staff A1212rovals Gazioglu - Color changes and stucco addition. GR 3120 Booth Falls CourtlLot 7, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing. Applicant: Peter Koliopoulos representing Halide Galioglu Miller - Color change to exterior. JC 1477 Aspen Ridge/Lot 3, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #4. Applicant: Will Miller Holm - Changes to approved plans. RS 4237 Columbine Drive/Lot 22, Bighorn Tenace Applicant: Claes and Amy Holm Vail Management Co. - New directory sign. LW 201 Gore Creek Drive/Bell Tower Building Applicant: Larry Ast, Hightech Signs Surefoot - Sign application. LW 278 flanson Ranch Road, old Gold Peak House/Bridge Street Lodge Building. Applicant: Larry Ast, High Tech Signs Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District - Stairway installation. RS 846 Forest Road/Sewer Plant Applicant: Gail Grider for UEVCSD Picture This - New Sign. RS 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing Applicant: Eddy Krasauskas Tuchman =.Remodel to allow for an addition (including 250) to the building. JC 3110 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 9, Block 3, Vail Village l lth Filing Applicant: Mr. Tuchrnan . Hughes - Remodel to allow for an addition (including 250) to the building. JC 3110 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 9, Block 3, Vail Village l lth Filing Applicant: Diane Hughes, Kendall Burney, King Hughes Bannister - Satellite dish JC 2943 Bellflower/Lot 4, Block 6, Intermountain Applicant: Frank Bannister Innsbruck 1Vleadows - Change to previously approved plans. GR 2832 A Kinnickinnick Road/Lot 3, Innsbruck Meadows Applicant: Bob Borne, Snowshoe Development 3 : ~ . Innsbruck Meadows - Change to previously approved plans. GR 2792 A Kinnickinnick Road/Lot 7, Innsbruck Meadows Applicant: Bob Borne, Snowshoe Development Bridge St. Lodge - New Sign. LW 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Bridge St. Lodge Applicant: Mike Justis . Telleen - Minor addition. LW 931 Red Sandstone Road/Aspen Tree Condos Applicant: Dan Telleen Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for infor?nafion. 4 - MEMORANDUM TO: Vaii Town Council FROM: Community Development Department • DATE: January 2, 1996 SUBJECT: Vail Athletic Club - Major Special Development District Amendment On December 11, 1995, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously recommended approval of The Vail Athletic Club's proposal for a Major SDD Amendment. The vote was 6-0. The Planning and Environmental Commission's recommendation for approval carried with it the 7 conditions as recdmmended by staff. The Pianning and Environmental Commission did, however, modify condition No.'s 4 and 5 as indicated in the bold type below. 1. That the applicant permanently deed restrict the 55 accommodation units as short-term rental units, and that the 55 accommodation units shall not be subdivided in the future to allow for individual ownership. The condominium declarations for the Vail Athletic Club shall be amended to include this requirement. These items shall be completed prior to the Town's release of any occupancy permits for the building. 2. The applicant shall execute and have recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office, the Town's Type IV Employee Housing Agreement for the four employee housing units proposed in the structure. This shall be required prior to the Town's release of any occupancy permits for the building. 3. Construction drawings, for all the site planning/streetscape improvements included as a part of this project, shall be submitted for the review and approval by the Town Engineer. This shall be required prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the project. 4. That the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the Design Review Board, carefully review the architectural character of the building and the details and materials which are proposed for use on the exterior of the building. That the proposed oversized shingles not be used as the exterior siding materials for the building and that the applican4 use more traditional siding materials such as stucco, wood and stone. 5. That all the deck rails and the exterior siding of the building be consistent with regard to design, material and color, and that this requirement shall include the two existing condominiums on the third and fourth floors of the building. . 6. That this application shall conform to Chapter 18.40.120 (Time Requirements) of the Town's Municipal Code, relating to "sunset" provisions for Special Development Districts. 7. That all the provisions stated in Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993, be met in full and be included as a part of this amendment to the SDD. Since the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting, the applicant has modified the Major SDD Amendment proposal to comply with the PEC's request to change the exterior materials of the structure. The applicant is now proposing an exterior that is predominantly stucco. The use of wood and stone is also apparent on the exterior of the building. The applicant's revised building elevations are attached to this memorandum to the Town Council. ~ \ i , 11 W n~, ~;~~d1P•~1 II~'~ n'-I ~I~ ~I ( i p il I i ~I ~ LJLi~LJ~ ol I ~ ."•~ad~ ~!~tdi =,!I ~ ~ I I . . I~. ~,i , g" ii iiT ~~,II" ; I, ~~~~.1~ i '~LW :r; .1;3: ~ la~~d~~. ~ i ~ ~i~, I ~ ~ i~. ~,I.~ .-•rirl ~ ~ ~-~+~id~_~I,.~ d ~ _ ..rl~~-' f ~ I ° I~C~ .i '-11 i! ~ ; . ~ ~ ~ ~'i ? ~~I !i u . ~ ~ ~ .,j ~ rTy- r - \ l VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB South Elevation . . . . . F= Moda. Dmq vzi. Cdmdo. ~ . ~ Wdud 8uday. Architcct Sale: 1/8'.1',0• 235 Fat nin Sneei. xew vut tn 10003 q 11_ . . ~ ° pmc 2K 598 0492, fa: 212 674 6869 Uac 11 • I4 . 15 i ~a , y. t411.4 ~..y.,• ~ ~ ; 'I ~ / i - ~ ~o~L~:~~l~~~, 7~ I~ ~ ~ ~ 1B. 1 1 ~ !y~W iI (I I~ ~ t. - ww~ai..ee. 1 ~RM I 1 'I , Il I I~II~ . wu wa rc efwu s - , r: I . I M I~ i 11 ~ I111~ '~UJ1!I li ~y_~ i p ~ ~ I i I ~ ItN.S' • ~ ~ ~5~1.1~ ~ ~,w,...~,• ~ I' \ ~ w. MM1Kf etil.~' L . _urr ~u~ ! ~Lil urg ~ _ ~ i ~.r,i.~~ j~.l 4~~1 w,il:~i~::i. • I~ i il lN u ~ ~ ~ h - ?L`, °a 1~1L' cz~= I - -VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB Elevations ~ . . Ca MeaOOn Drns. Y211, CdasEO ' . . l4ifuel BnNay, Architett Snk: 1/8'•1'-0' 235 Ent 17th SUect, New York. NY 10003 y 'I' O~a mne: 212 598 M92, hr. 212 674 68W Oaz Is • I7 •'Ih ti I MEMoRANDuM FILE COPY TO: Planning Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: December 11, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for a Major Special Development District (SDD) Amendment, tocated at the Vail Athletic Club, 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly described as. follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Tract B; thence N 79°46'00" W along the Northerly line of Vail Village, First Filing, and along the Northerly line of said Tract B 622.86 feet; thence S 06°26'52" W a distarice of 348.83 feet to the Southwest corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January 10. 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, said corner also being the True Point ot Beginning; thence S 79°04'08" E and along the Southerly line of said parcel 200.00 feet to the Southeast corner thereof; thence N 62°52'00" E and along the Northerly line of that parcel of land described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle County Records, a ' distance of 66.78 feet to the Nor[heasterly corner of said parcel of land; said corner being on the Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27°13'37" W a distance of 77.37 feet along said Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89°29'22" W a distance of 12.80 feet to the Northeasterly corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Northwesterly 26.51 feet along the arc of a 37.50 feet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40130'00" whose chord bears N 53°40'00" W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 73°55'00" W and along said tangent 166.44 feet; thence N 85° 10'21" W a distance of 50.40 feet to the Northwesterly corner of the Mountain Haus Parcel; thence S 02° 18'00" W and along the easterly line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of 100.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner thereof; thence S 45°13'S3" E a distance of 38.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning, containing 30,486 square feet, more or less. Applicant: JVVf 1987 Vail Limited Partnership, (dba Vail Athletic Club), • represented by Stan Cope and Michael Barclay Planner: Mike Mollica V. PROJECT OVERV9EW and IBAC9(GROIBND On IVovember 2, 1993, the Vail Town Council approved the establishment of Special Development District (SDD) fVo. 30 ( the Vail Athletic Club) and the detailed development plan for the SDD. The Town Council approval of Ordinance No. 27; Series of 1993 passed by a vote of 5-2. The Town Council approval occurred following approximately six-months of review, by the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Design Review Board (DRB), during which four joint PEC/DRB public hearings were held. An overview of the 1993 SDD approval is . 1 listed in outline form as Exhibit B, attached to this memorandum. On July 24, 1995, the Planning & Environmental Commission held a worksession to discuss possible amendments to the 1993 approved development plan. A copy of the meeting minutes are attached to this memorandum, as Exhibit D. Subsequent to this July PEC meeting, the applicant requested that the Major SDD Amendment request be tabled, in order to allow them to make adjustments to the application. At this time, the applicant is prepared to move forward and os requesting a Major Amendrnent to the 1993 approved SDD, to allow for the redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive. The proposed amendments to the 1993 approved SDD inClude the following: , • The creation of three additional accommodation units (AU's) - for a total of 55 AU's for the SDD. The creation of one additional dwelling unit (DU) - for a total of four DU's for ihe SDD. • The expansion of the spa lounge to the south, over an existing skylight, (190 square feet of floor area). This expansion does not count as additional site coverage since there is ' existing floor area beneath this space. This is the only proposed change to the "general footprint" of the 1993 approved structure. • The reconfiguration of the north facing, upper-level dormers. Nine gable dormers are now proposed in this area, and are similar in architectural design to the previously approved south-facing dormers. The 1993 approval included nine "articulated" north-facing dormers. • The addition of a north-facing 5th floor clerestory (as suggested by the PEC in July). • The south-facing dormers have been slightly modified. Additionally, the south-facing inverted dormers ("roof cutouts"), originally approved in the center-most area of the roof have been eliminated. • Although the overall mass and bulk of the proposed structure has not changed to any significant degree,. an internal reconfiguration of the spaces has occurred. The details of this reconfiguration (area calculations) are included as Exhibit A. In summary, the applicant is proposing an additional 1,769 square feet of gross floor area, to be located within the building envelope of the 1993 approved plans. Relating to building height, all the proposed dormers (north and south facing) will meet the 1993 approved maximum ridge height elevations. • The reconfiguration of the interior spaces has resulted in a decrease in the required number of parking spaces. The 1993 approval required that nine additional parking spaces be added to the existing 19-20 space garage. This SDD amendment request requires four additional parking spaces, which are proposed to be provided within the existing parking structure. • All of the proposed site and building improvements (including streetscape improvements, landscaping, etc.) associated with the 1993 SDD approval remain intact. A detailed 2 v" listing of these improvements is attached as Exhibit C. H. CRITER9A TO BE fl.DSED BN EVALfl9e4TiiVG THIS PEiOPOSAL The proposed amendments described in Section I are considered to be Major Amendments to the 1993 approved SDD. As stated in the Zoning Code, a major amendment is defined as follows: "Major amendment means any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential floor area; change the number of dwelling or accommodation units; modify, enlarge or expand any approved Special Development District (other than minor amendments as defined in subsection 18.40.020B)." Since the applicant's proposed amendments to the SDD involve changes to gross residential floor are.a, as well as density (number of units), the proposal is required to follow the Major SDD Amendment procedure. The PEC shall provide a recommendation to the Town Council regarding the proposal. The Town Council shall approve the proposal via two readings of an ordinance. 611. SPEC9AL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CFiITERiA As provided for in Chapter 18.40 of the Town's Municipal Code, there are nine SDD review criteria which are to be used to evaluate the merits of a proposed Major SDD Amendment. Vt shou9d be noted that ghe sgaff analysis of 4he project's compliance with the SDD revieuv criteria has only focusedl on the proposed amendments to the SDD, and not on the balance og the 1993 approdal. The review criteria, and the staff's analysis of the proposal's compliance with the review criteria, are as follows: A. Design compatobaB6$y and sensitavity to 4he Bmmediate eravironment, neighborhood and acljacenY properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building heighg, buffer aones, edentatyy CItlaraC6PiPy visual integrity and orientation. Due to the.nature of the SDD review process, the PEC has the authority to review and critique much of the architectural detailing for the project. The staff will be presenting colored renderings of the exterior elevations of the structure, of.both the 1993 approved drawings as well as the current 1995 SDD amendment proposal. Although there have been a variety of architectural changes made to the design of the building, the overall scale, and mass and bulk of the proposed structure will generally remain as it was approved in 1993. The primary roof forms (and building height) will also remain as approved in 1993. The following outlines the areas vuhere there are proposed changes to the architectural design of the structure: • Upper level dormers and clerestory (fourth and fifth floors); • Third level "porches" (north elevation); • Gable roof added to east stair tower/restaurant entry; • Restaurant fenestration (north elevation); and • Architectural character of the building (elimination of srucco & the use of uvood siding/shingles). 3 , The 1993 app-, oval included a series of "articulated" dormers on both the north and south elevations of the structure. Staff believes that the 1993 architectural approach was very successful in that it not only broke up the large expanses of roof area, but it also allowed for a very attractive interior room layout. Additionally, the design kept the shading on East Meadow Drive to a minimum. Although the project architect is now proposing a more traditional gable-style dormer, the staff continues to be comfortable with the design approach, and we believe this change will improve the overall "alpine character" and quality of the building. Staff does, however, have some concerns with the proposed changes to the overall ~ architectural character of the building. The project architect is proposing to eliminate the previously approved stucco on the exterior of the building, and is now proposing to side the building with a mixture of oversized wood shingles, board and batten siding, redwood trim and a new stone base. A new shake shingle roof is also proposed. According to the project architect, the proposed "rustic mountain lodge" design is intended to mimic the architectural style(s) used for buildings such as the Clubhouse at Cordillera, the Old Faithful Inn (Yellowstone National Park) and the Boathouse at Saranac Lake (New York). Please see exhibit E for reproduced photos of these properties. The staff's concern is that this design style has not historically been utilized in the Vail Village area, and although we are not opposed to a"new" design approach, we are concerned with the precedent setting nature of the issue. We encourage the PEC, and subsequently the DRB, to carefully review the proposal with regard to the overalf . character of the building, and specifically, to review the proposed exterior materials.. One additional detail relates to the two existing condominiums in the project (third and - fourth floor locations). These two condominium owners do not wish to modify their exterior deck rails to conform with the new deck rails proposed for the balance of the building. Staff believes that all the deck rails on the building need to be consistent and we will recommend this as a condition of approval. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatibte, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The general uses within the redeveloped Vail Athletic Club (VAC) are not proposed to change. Given that the applicant is generally working within the confines of the 1993 approved building envelope, the staff views the addition of three accommodation units to be a positive element of the proposal. Short-term accommodation units are strongly recommended in the Vail Village Master Plan, as discussed later in this memorandum. It should be noted that one additional dwelling unit is also proposed at this time. While the staff would prefer that this unit be an accommodation unit, we also recognize that the existing VAC has a total of nine dwelling units, and that the SDD proposal calls for the elimination of five of those units. When viewed as a whole, this is a positive step, in staff's opinion. Staff recognizes that approximately 1,769 square feet of gross additional floor area is proposed to be added as a part of this amendment application. We feel that the project architect has been very creative in the overall design and layout of the interior spaces, . and has now maximized the full floor area potential within the 1993 established building 4 envelope. VVc are comfortable uvith the request for the additional square footage. C. Coewpl6ance wath park6ng andl loading requerements as outlined un Chapter 18.52. Staff believes that the proposed amendments to the SDD are in comptiance with this criteria. As detailed in Exhibit A, the proposed Major SDD Amendment requires an additional four parking spaces. This is a reduction from the 1993 approval, which required an additional nine parking spaces. To satisfy the Town's requirement for the - four additional parking spaces, the appticant has proposed a valet paricing program, and vuill add four parking spaces within the existing parking structure. The valet parking program was approved in 1993, and the staft continues to support the valet parking Concept. As approved in 1993, the applicant is continuing to propose a loading area (a pull-out) off of East Meadow Drive. This area is intended to accommodate the shart-term parking needs of the project, as well as the loading and delivery functions for the hotel and restaurant. In addition, the applicant is proposing to remove the existing trash facility currentfy located on the west side of the building, and to construct a trash room (with a trash compactor) within the enclosed parking garage: D. Conforenity wi$h app9acable e0ements of the Vai9 Cornprehensive Plan, Town policies and 49rban Design PIans. VAUIL LAND VJ ~~_~LAN The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to be used as the Town's policy guidelines during the review process for new or amended development proposals. The staff considered the following Land Use Plan Goals/Policies during the initial review of the 1993 SDD establishment for the Vail Athletic Club, and further, staff believes that these goals and policies continue to be applicable with regard to the current Major SDD Amendment proposal: 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve • both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 3_2 The Village and Lionshead areas are the best location for hotels to serve the future needs of the destination skiers. 3.3 Hotels are important to the continued success of the Touvn of Vail, therefore conversion to condominiums shouid be discouraged. 4_2 Increased density in the core areas is acceptable so Iong as the existing . character of each area is preseroed through implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. 5 C 4_3 -The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail and should be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, small town feeling, mountains, ' natural setting, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental quality.) 5_3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions. 5_5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved. and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. Overall, the staff believes that the proposed Major SDD Amendment application meets the goals and policies of the Land Use Plan as described above. VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN The staff believes that the 1993 approval for the redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club carried out many of the goals and objectives contained in the Vail Village Master Plan. Additionally, the staff believes that the current Major SDD Amendment proposal also furthers the following Master Plan's goals and objectives: , Goal 1-Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. Objective 1.2 - Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. Goal #2 - To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-round economic health and . viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. Objective 2.1 - Recognize the variety of land uses found in the 10 sub-areas throughout the Village and allow for development that is compatible with these established land use patterns. Objective 2.3 - Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations. Policy 2.3.1 - The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term overnight rental. Objective 2.5 - Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. Policy 2.5.1 - Recreation amenities, common areas, meeting facilities and other amenities shall be preserved and enhanced as a part of any redevelopment of 6 e 7 ladgiriy properties. Objective 2.6 - Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of the private sector. Objective 2.6.1 - Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning. Goal 3- To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience throughout the village. Objective 3.4 - Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access. Goal #5 - Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulation system throughout the Village. Policy 5.1.1 - For new development that is located outside of the Commercial Core I Zone Disirict, on-site parking shall be provided (rather than paying into the parking fund) to meet any additional parking demand as required by the zoning code. Policy 5.1.5 - Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide underground or visually concealed parking. The staff believes that the proposed Major SDD Amendment application meets, and furthers, the Vail Village Master Plan goals, objectives, and policies as described above. E. Vdentification and ma4igation of natural and/ar geologic hazards that affect the property on whach the speciaE cJevelopment district is propasec9. Although this project is located adjacent to Gore Creek, no portion of the proposa,l encroaches into the fifty-foot stream setback, nor into the 100-year floodplain. There are no other natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property. F. Site plan, baaaBdong design and location and open space provisoons designed to produce a func4AOna0 development responsove and sensitive to nataaral features, vegetatoon and overall aes$hetic quality of the comrnunity. I Although this criteria was discussed extensively during the 1993 review, staff believes that the proposed Major SDD Amendment will have no negative impacts on this criteria. G. A circuBaBion system alesugned fior both vehic9es and pedestriaras addressing on aaas9 off-si4e 4raffic cBrcuBa4Bom. - The staff believes that the proposed Major SDD Amendment will have no impacts on this criteria. The staff uvould encourage the PEC to review the September 30, 1993 staff memorandum to the PEC (attached as Exhibit F) for background information regarding this issue. 7 , r H. Functional ai-id aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. Again, the staff believes that the proposed Major SDD Amendment will have no impacts on this criteria. 1. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughouf the development of the special development district. The applicant has not proposed that the construction of this project be phased. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommendation is for approval of the applicanYs request for a Major SDD Amendment, to allow for the redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club. We believe that the _ proposal meets the review criteria for Major SDD Amendment applications, as detaiied in Section III of this memorandum. We also believe that the Major SDD Amendment request is in compliance with the goals and objectives of the Vail Comprehensive P1an, as well as the purpose section of the SDD Zone District. The staff recommendation for approval carries with it the following conditions: 1. That the applicant permanently deed restrict the 55 accommodation units as short-term rental units, and that the 55 accommodation units shall not be subdivided in the future to allow for individual ownership. The condominium declarations for the Vail Athletic Club shall be amended to include this , requirement. These items shall be completed prior to the Town's release of any occupancy permits for the building. 2. The applicant shall execute and have recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and „ Recorder's Office, the Town's Type IV Employee Housing Agreement for the four employee housing units proposed in the structure. This shall be required prior to the Town's release of any occupancy permits for the building. 3. Construction drawings, for all the site planning/streetscape improvements included as a part of this project, shall be submitted for the review and approval by the Town Engineer. This shall be required prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the project. 4. That the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the Design Review Board, carefully review the architectural character of the building and the details and materials which are proposed for use on the exterior of the building. 5. That all the deck rails on the exterior of the building be consistent with regard to design, material and color, and that this requirement shall include the two existing condominiums on the third and fourth floors of the building. 6. That this application shall conform to Chapter 18.40.120 (Time Requirements) of 8 J a the Tuwn's Municipal Code, relating to "sunseY" provisions for Special Development Districts. 7. That all the provisions stated in Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993, be met in full and be included as a part of this amendment to the SDD. F:\everyone\{iec\memos\vacamend.Dt 1 9 VAI]L ATHII,E'g'~~ CLUB - DECEMBER 1995 SDD AMENDMENT ANAILYSIS PARKING 1995 PROPOSED 1993 APPROVED SPACES FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA DIFFERENCE REOUIRED EHU (GRFA): 11295 Sq. Ft. 1,383 Sq. Ft.* - 88 Sq. Ft. 4.0 AU (GRFA): 24,898 Sq. Ft. 24,687 Sq. Ft.* + 211 Sq. Ft. 46.555 ~ DU (GRFA): 8,312 Sq. Ft. 6,252 Sq. Ft.* + 2,060 Sq. Ft. 8.5 (Includes lock-offs ) Comrnon: 15,054 Sq. Ft. 14,265 Sq. Ft.* + 789 Sq. Ft. 0.00 Club: 21,609 Sq. Ft. 20,881 Sq. Ft. + 728 Sq. Ft. 0.00 Garage: 4,780 Sq. Ft. 5,512 Sq. Ft. - 732 Sq. Ft. 0.00 Restaurant (Gross): 3,268 Sq. Ft. 3,285 Sq. Ft. - 17 Sq. Ft. 16.8 (net public areas) 1Vleeting/Conf 1.545 Sq. Ft. 2,727 Sq. Ft.* - 1.182 Sq. Ft. 6.437 'd'otals: 80,761 Sq. Ft. 78,992 Sq. Ft. + 1,769 Sq. Ft. 82.292 -78.440 (existing/grandfathered) 3.852 = 4 Existine 1993 Approval* 1995 Pronosal # DU's = 9(2 with lock-offs) 3(2 with lock-offs) 4(2 with lock-offs) ~ # AU's** = 28 52 55 # EHU's * = 4 4 (Type Nl 4 ~ Total Density - 24.33 30.33 32.83 y - a Per Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993 AU's constitute 0.5 of a DU -for calculating density EHU's constitute 0.33 of a DU - for calculating density f.bwryone4nilm\vac.wpd . T ! EXHIBIT B Highlights of the1993 SDD approval: 1. Decrease the amount of GRFA allocated towards dwelling units and increase the amount of GRFA for accommodation units. 2. Decrease the number of c}welling units and increase the number of accommodation units. 3. Ericroach further into the front setback with entry and second-story accommodation unit as well as an addition to the restaurant to the east of the entry. 4. Irtcrease common area while decreasing the area allocated towards accessory uses and . athletic club use. 5. Add dormers to the building on the north and south side which do not exceed the existing ridge height of the building. Insert decks into the roof structure on the south elevation. 6. Increase the amount of site coverage as a result of the new entry and restaurant addition (554 square feet). 7. Add terrace and expand dining deck on south elevation. 8. Removal of deck on the south elevation which currently encroaches onto public land. 9. The applicant is proposing to meet the incremental increase in parking requirements. There is an existing deficit of 58.44 spaces on the site. The new parking is located in the following manner. 92 spaces built underground below the entry 92 spaces added by relocating an existing ski storage area •2 spaces added by relocating the laundry room •1 space added along the south side of the parking structure •2 sAaces in central area of 12arkina structure 9 total . 10. Change exterior materiais of building. This includes stucco, wood trim,•deck railings and a wood shake roof. 11. Add streetscape improvements. These include: a 6 foot heated concrete paver walk along ` West Meadow Drive, an 8 foot heated concrete paver walk along Vail Valley Drive extending over the Gore Creek bridge and sVeet lamps. The pavers on the bridge will not be heated. 12. Relocation of existing trash area and removal of the existing trash facility wrhich is encroaching onto adjacent properties. 13. The applicant proposes to provide one two-bedroom employee housing unit within the Town of Vail which will be restricted according to the Town of Vail employee housing requirements. 14. Additional landscaping on the north and south sides of the building. , VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB EXHIBIT C (4 pages) ~ September 1 1, 1993 IVovember 11, 1995 revisions in "italics" ' SDD - STATEMENT OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The Vaii Athletic Club (VAC) agrees as part of the implementation of our SDD proposal to make the foliowing improvements: Landscapg - East PAeadow Drive / Vail Val{ev Dride The VAC will extend the curb and sidewalk.6'-0" along East Meadow Drive and 8'-0" along Vail Valley Drive to create a continuous, heated, rectangular concrete paver sidewalk extending from west end of the VAC service/parking drive on East Meadow Drive to the Gore Creek Bridge on Vail Valley Drive. This will be coordinated with the town engineer. We will revise the curb line at intersection of East Meadovu Drive and Vail Valley Drive in accordance with the "entry feature" concepts put forward in the Vail Village Master Plan and as shown on the site plan. At the "entry feature" and partially along Va+l Valley Drive, we will eliminate the existing retaining wall to bring the landscape down to the level of the sidevualk. We will reface the existing landscape retaining walls along the garage and Vail Valley Drive with stone. We will incorporate signage to inform vehicles that East Meadow Drive is a"pedestrian area" open only to vehicles on "official business" with the VAC and the Mountain House. We will work with the Design Review Board and AIPP to supplement the existing streetlamps along the VAC side of Vail Valley and East Nieadow Drives. . We will create a new car pull-off guest drop-off area directly in front of the new hotel/health club entry. This area will be paved with granite pavers and heated. We will need consent from the town's authorities that short-term parking in the opposite direction will be permitted here. The creation of the new hotel/health club entry and car pull-off along East Meadow Drive shauld resuft minimal disruption to the existing vegetation in the landscaped area above the existing garage. All necessary steps will be taken throughout the course of construction to protect the existing vegetation. New drainage grates will be introduced to handle melting runoff at East Meadow Drive. This will be coordinated vuith the town engineer. We will replace the existing wood transformer grate with a new steel grate. Landscape - Gore Creek / South Side We will work with the town to formalize an informal maintenance agreement regarding the town's property between the VAC and ttie pedestrian path along Gore Creek. We will prune the dead brush in the area between the VAC and Gore Creek. We will remove the existing wood sundeck that is partially on town property, as well as the existing wood utility shed by the hot tubs and the existing wood trash shed at the service/garage drive. We will create -a landscaped path from the end of the existing service drive/fire lane through to the town property on the south side of the VAC. We will construct a new stone terrace at the existing upper health club/swimming pool level along the south side of the building as shown on the site plan. Buildinq Exterior We will reside the entire outside of the building. The new siding will be a combination of oversized shingles at most of the existing stucco areas, board and batten at the new dormers and redwood trim. There will be a stone base by the new entry. We will be installing a new wood shingle roof throughout. We will be building onto and residing the existing porches, balconies and decks with new wood trim to create the more traditional porches shown on the elevations. We will be extending the existing dining deck along the south side of the restaurant to connect with the new hotel lounge. We will be constructing a new on-grade hotel/health club entry on East Meadow Drive. We will be extending the north wall of the restaurant 6'-0" to the north and filling in an existing 28' x 9' "indentation" along the south side of the dining terrace. We will be installing new clad wood windows and doors throughout. We will be adding new dormers at the fourth floor level along both the north and south sides of the existing structure. We will be adding new chimneys throughout for the new gas fireplaces. 0 071teP90P Imlprovemerats - Health Club 0 The improvements to the health club will not be extensive, they will focus on increasing the spa and cardiovascular capacity of the club and adding new doors and windows along the south wa11 of the upper level in order to introduce more natural light into the club. Most areas of the club stay as they are. VVe will be adding a new tloor at the upper health club level above the existing racquetball court. dVe will be creating a new staff locker/lounge area at the upper health club level. IP1tePIOP IenpPOVemerets - Garage We will create a total of 4 additional on-site parking spaces for a total of 24. Interoor ImprovePnents - Hotel We will be creating a new double-high hotel lobby vuhich will connect to the new hotel/health club entry. There will be a new open stair to a balcony above the iobby at the second floor. . VNe will be renovating and revising the existing conference room on the first floor. We will be relocating two employee units from. the foureh floor to the first floor. The other tvuo employee units will be relocated to the third floor. These units will be maintained on-site, as per a previous agreement, for the life of the structure. We will be eliminating 5 existing DU's and adding 27 new AU's to create a new room mix of 4 DU's and 55 . AU's. All of the existing hotel rooms will be totally renovated. All of the bathrooms will be renovated and made larger. Other Improvements Most of the existing mechanical systems will renovated and relocated to an attic above the fourth floor or to new mechanical rooms at the lower health club level. We will be installing a new, 6-story, hydraulic, passenger elevator within the existing shaft to serve the hotel and health club. We will be installing a new 2-story, hydraulrc, passenger elevator between the restaurant and the upper level of the health club to faciltate deliveries and trash removal. We will be installing a trash compactor and roll away trash containers to handle the hotel/health club trash. The restaurant grease and trash will be handled in a similar way. Trash storage will be at the west end of garage. We will be adding a sprinkler system to the hotel portion of the building. The entire building will be brought up to the current handicap requirements. . Schedule We hope to start construction in the spring of 1996 and open the renovated VAC in by the start of the 1996-7 ski season. , , a EXHIBIT D 0 • (3 PAGES) Greg Amsdem sana thank you and that this meeting was for directional purposes for the applicant. 3. A reqnestt for awmrkgessaon for a major SDD amendment, located at the Vail Athletic Club/352 East Meadover Drive and more specifically descnbed as follows: . Aparcel of land in Trac4 B. Va7 !/illage Frst Firing, Town of Val, Eagle County, Colorado, commencing al the. Waaiheast comer of said Tract B; thence N 79`45'00° W along the Northerly line of Va~l Vllage, Frst Fling, and - aYong the MoNherly 6ne of said Tract 8 622.86 feel; Yhence S 06°26'52° W a dstance of 348.83 feet to the Saanhwest comer of lhal parcel of land described in Book 191 al Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed j- ira Reception No.,102978 in 1he Eagle County Records, said comer also being the True Point of Beginning; thence S79°04'08° E and along the Southerly fine of said parcel 200.00 teet to the Southeas4 comerthereof; thence Pd r 62°52'00° E and along the PJoRherty line of thai parcel of land desuibed in Book 222 al Page 513 as recorded in ` 1971 in the Eagle Gounty Records, a dstance of 66.78 fest to the Northeasterfy comer of said parcel o( land; said coner being on the WesteAy right•of-way fine of Gore Creek Road, as platted in Val Vllage, Ffth Fling; thence Pd - 2'7•73'37° W a distance of 77.37 teet along said Westeriy right-of-way Gne of Gore Creek Road; thence Pd 89°2922° 1h/ a dstance of 1280 feet to the Northeasierly comer of that parcel of land descnbed in Book 191, ~ Page 139 as recorded January 10,1966 and filed in Reception No.102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence ; Pdorihwesterty 26.59 feet along the arc of a 37.50 4ee4 radius curve to the leit having a cernral angte of 40°30'00° whose chord bears Fd 53`40'00° W a distance of 25.96 teet to a point of tangenry; thence Id 73°55'00° W and • along said tangen9166.44 teet; thence id 85`10'21 ° W a distance of 50.40 feet to the Aforthwesterly comer of the ` RRountain Haus Paroel; thence S 02`18'00° W and along the easteriy line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance . of 900.00 feet 10 lhe Southeasterly comer thereof; thence S 45°73'53° E a distance of 38.70 teet to ihe True Point - of Beginning, containing 30,486 square feet, more or less: Applacant JAV'T 1987 Vail I.imited Parmership, (d/b/a Vail Athletic Club), represented by Stan Cope and Michael Barclay Planner_ Mgce Nqollica Mike Mollica asked the PEC to look at the dra«rings Arith the proposed changes. Mike reviewed the zoning analysas with the PEC and discussed the staffls identified issues. Michael Barclay, representing the Vail Athletic Club, spoke about the architectural qualities of the building and stated that the three shed dormers vvere only one solution to resolve*the snow problems on the roof. Mike Mollica said the shade and shadow'was an issue. He explained that December 21 st was the worst scenario. - Bob Armour said that the 1993 approval was for 1600 sq.ft. of additional floor area and now it's 1800 sq.ft. Dalton VVilliams stated that he had no problems with the square footage proposed. Bob Armour asked if everyone was comfortable mith the addition of hvo accommodatibn units for this buildinga The project also includes additional square footage (from the parking garage) for a staff lockerarea. Bob Amlour stated that they were not changing the building envelope, just ~ adding squage footage intemally. ' ~ ~ Michael Barclagr said they were better off leaving the roof on and using the extra space to house t mechanical xysYems. Heniy Pra4t said building over the skylight technically changes the building envelope. Planning and Environme:nal Commission ' • Minvtes / 1 i ' Daltan Williams-baid modifying the dormers changes the roof height. Dalton said he likes this architecture better, however, he wants to feel secure that the height is not changed from the 1993 - approvaL - Mgce Mollica suggested loweri.ng the dormer height to the approved 1993 approved plan. Henry Pratt asked for.the history of the East Village Homeowners A.ssociation's issues. = Dalton NV'311iams explained why Jim Lamont opposed the original plan. . _ Bob Armaur wanted to touch on the parlQng issues. . = Mgce Mollica suinmarized. that in 1993 there were 9 parldng spaces required. This new proposal reduces tbat number to 2 spaces. . : Jeff Bowen has a problem with the lack of parking. He stated, "a hotel of this substance can't . reducc the number of parking spaces." - Mike 3Vloilica said the zoning code is wbat sets the requirement for the number of parldng spaces . and that the applicant was meeting, and exceedinc,, the required pazldng. JeffBowen said with an SDD, 9 spaces should still be required. Mi7ce Alollica said the parking requuement in the zoning code was tied to the uses. JeffBowen said the zoning code was used as an index. Parking spaces were computed for a reason agd he feels the 9 spaces must remain for the hotel. Bob Armour said he would like to see more spaces. Michael Barclay stated that he is providing 4 spaces wben the Zoning Code only requires two. Greg Amsden agrees with Staff regarding the parldng. - Greg Moffet had no problem with the parking proposal. Kevin Deighan agreed «rith Staff. Henry Pratt also agrees with the parlcing numbers that Staff has come up with. DaltQm Williams also agrees with the parking numbers that Staff has come up with. Bob Armour asked the Commissioners if they were comfortable with the 1995 architecture. Kevin Deaghan was more comfortable with the 1993 architecture, but doesn't have a problem with the revised 1995 plan. Greg Moffet said the architectural decisions were more appropriate for DRB review. Planning and Environmemal Commission I,Ainines Q . d . - Greg Ansden likes the new architectural design and said that DRB will fine tune it. - MAe Mollica stated that the clerestory was recently added to the plan. Michael Barclay said the clerestory eaould not bc covered with snow most of thc time, as skylights ; would- - _ Henay Pmt4likes the dormers, but prefers the 1993 fenestration. The dormers are too close " together and he feels will piesent a leaking problem. He thinks the shed dormers detract from the ~ design. . . L ~ DaltoraWilliams said the clerestory on the roof adds architectural interest on the roof. The 1993 cutouts nn the roof didn't work very well. Dalton reminded everyone that the Town rules for a SDD required PEC to re`riew the architectural details. t' Jeff Bm-wen, notwithstanding the fact that he liked the 1993 version, felt the new design was quite nice. He has a problem Nvith the second story restaurant expansion in that it doesn't seem to fit the rest mf'the building. It seems too massive. Aqichael Barclay stated that the vegetation was thick and would cover it. Bob Aamour thought the restaurant area was a little too high. Henry Pr.att pointed out thae in the 1993 design there were punched windows and now there is a window vvall. He felt it wasn't consistent. Dalton Williams asked if the pavers on the Gore Creek bridge would be heated. Mike R/Iollica said the wallcway to tbe edge of the bridge Nvould be heated, but not the bridge itself. Hc also said there would be brick pavers that would match the Town's Streetscape Plan. . Bob Aainour asked if there was anything else to give direction ta the applicant to look at. Michaei Barclay had one comment about the restaurant windows. Most of the facade is window or wood tri.ni. This mirrors what is on the south side. They wanted to introduce more wood to break up -the stucco. ' Bob Arni+.our thought the DRB vvould have some problems with the restaurant design and he directed tie applicant to explore more options. 4. .,.~ret~uest for a major SDD amendment to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office s Bmild.ang, located at 1000 S. Frontage RdJArea D, Cascade Village SDD #4. ~ • Alpplicant Gordon Pierce for Glen Lyon Partnership ' PEanner: Randy Stouder Jeff Bowcm made a motion to t.able this until August 14th. , Plan"ning and Environmental Commission M P Barclay, Architect EXHIBIT E(6 a es 235 East Eleventh Street P g New York, NY 10003 212-598-0492 ~ December 2, 1995 Mike Mollica Community Development Town of Vail Vail, CO 81657 re: Vail Athletic Club Dear Mike, Enclosed are "in progress" 1/4" elevations of the south, east and north elevations of the VAC. Hopefully these will provide sufficient detail for you and the staff to clearly understand my proposal for the outside of the VAC. My proposal calls for replacing all of the stucco at from the first floor up with either wood shingles, wood trim (or metal trim detailed and painted to appear to be wood) or board and batten. Most of the east, north and west elevations of the VAC as it exists today would become sheathed with oversize (approximately 9" exposure) wood shingles. The new dormers will be sheathed with a rough-faced board and batten. The south side of the building, as a consequence of its almost continuous porch or windows, will be a combination of wood trim and steel painted to read as wood. The handrails on the south side of the building will be steel with 1" square ballusters and 5" spaces. On the north side of the building, the handrails will either be steel or wood slats 5 1/2" wide with 112" spaces. These will be painted or stained to appear to be the same shade of redwood. I've also enclosed photographs of some of the buildings that are similar to certain aspects of my proposal . for the outside of the VAC. Old Faithful Inn, Yellowstone National Park (color and black and white) - for the the massing, trim and use of oversize wood shingles Boathouse at Saranac Lake, NY - for the trim details and the variety of different exterior woods The Clubhouse at Cordierra - as an example of a mostly wood exterior and for the combination of board and batten and wood shingle I hope this is helpful. I'll call Monday. Y U1~ Michael - - Uia raitntul inn is iocaied m a geothermai area w+th eartnquake proof oesign. A new rear entrance of rustic ° Wyoming - Idaho ° Old Faithful geyser nearby. Construction of the inn was stick style blends into the scheme of the inn, provides AAon4ana started in 1903. Design changes and additions were for handicapped accessibility, and also relieves the made until shortly before World War II. Small congestion from the service and front desk areas. d ~ iq , ~ t 1 ~ e r , r ~ ~.~s --~.~~'~'~,'~~*`~,~~P - !qi."3 5~ ''•'4ik.6 Q:s.~ u ,~"tE; . x'3a~'c~'h - . ~o`v, . • . ':1,,., 2' ,k .T.:, '?F . ( i: ~.r , . • ~t . ss'"~'~ i.i ~e'• k-~z~3exX,~~4c ~'-.?r_ ~'~,,,"~f,1.r,. v,e .t-'r~' i.-~ .Y ' ~~h ~~c~• Y.,.U_~ ' c..f~W~ . 1 III ' 11 11 l:' • r. ...'fu4~' . S iA•: ~T;: x K~~,t.•.5'.~_'YV . . .tr ~ , i ~ , • ,;rn~' ; : W: R' ' x . I~ , • ~~t~C~ ; i y``•. ; . ~ • t; ~ ~ y,~•. Jlf: ~ ~ . ii~.' ~t~?''` r `~~ib`•1. ~ '%~i~ ' . + ~ .,:1' ' ~'~.t ~ .•J _ ~ ~ ' .,a~~r :,,-f ' r A,~,~ : . . : • ~ : ~ 't ^T1 ~ . ' . f r~'! ~ I 11 I i I r`.;^= i~ ;J., . I I• . ~•t ~ , •I.i. i i•,:. - ~ ,.i~,. ~ 'j , ' r , .1 : . ~ •.r-- , . . 1' ' 1 _ • 11~' ` 4wi..... ~ . _ . _ . ~ .C „ •Yw.. .4 ~}..~..~-"'-'r.;JR-+. 'n~.r' ...r,~ ~ ~ "L , !;t r~,o ~ , • ' . i 'rc~;••.'~wAild~rr~:fR',r~"a~ij, ...~~!'•~,~~..~-1~~r.w~.. I ..:~1!IC~~ L':'~'~fr•I.~.:~~~A ~ r.' N ' - ` ~„~b arL , . ~ .~.~tk4 .w,-~:.'. _ ~ • . ~~~~,~~.."rl t 4i.. .:;~r . • 'i~ . . ~ iyiyV• : ~.r - ' • . . . _y • ' ~ k~!:y46~~ . -:r• ~ .•4~"y. _ . • . '"A':r' • ~ + '*.~K.~ :~..~.J: ~,'•i: . . ; . ,'r- ' v: .i. ~ .~~y~St.~,...~ii+~; - : . :J. : • . _ . ~ . . ' . . - . . ~r- ~ .E; . _ . . • . ~ - . • y, • - - ' • ~ J' ' ' " . `Y ~_y Y:'.~.70' ~ ?`•':t''~' ~.J, - . . • 1~ ~ . . ' ' J ' Vi . ' :t,M' - . , . . ' • ~ . . 'T~. . . ' . ~ '1 + a ' + ~ ' . ~I'.1•...i . .S~'. ' ' ' , ~ ' . ~ , ~ti~l ' •A 4 • , • 4^~ ~''.Jf~ ~ . _ ` . ` ~ ~ . . + ~ . ' _ ' ~ • , • . . . . . . ~ - , " ' . , , " . • , .-~r-"Y,~'.,y' . • . . . . . • ~ . 2. View of the •old house', ctrca 1905 ~ Please credit: NPS Archtves Duplication Permission Granted ~ R: . • ~ . 1 ~ o~ . ~ I ) 1~ f r 1 , . . Y~~;i"M. ~ .?o' ~ ~A9'~ y . _ ' , ` • +dM ~~~~~.nr'~?~~~ ~ 4~.. .~j . ~...1,,,• . . ~~,p ..o ylf~ . . . . , . ~ - ' ~ f. t „ i . _ , ¢ ~ " + 'td" . o~ ...'~w ' ...n!'~'t~' • " .,q1 _ -sG . , ` ~ •tr . . , , ~ ,,•°~vI . .Q . ~•'e i~~~. . ° :b , G~ _ . ~ , . 1903 plc9 r-Oi4h4u1 inn~ A{chlves 9. cred14: NPS t~ran4ed Pteas ~ permisslon na nel`C81QiOn ~ ~ ~ ~:Qi~} ~~y{.~ ~ ' T ' . ?~,1 y . ~ ~ ~ ' t y r~ 1'i..~~.:~a. • r ~ ~ H ~ i, `4i~; . ~ . t Ir ~ a'~ ~ • `i G . 3'`~.~ . . . , ~ y./ 4 ` ~ ~ ~ I , . I _ _ I ~ " ~ "`fi•3' y' - - . -?o, . , " t ~ - , ~ „ =i' ; • ~ / , i ~ , ' - • ' t • • , i ' . _ " ..t ? . . . .i blf II ~ .t ~ + I • ' , f~ 4t . ~ ~ , I `I~ s ~It . :i ~ ~i~. . • ' ' ~ ~ . _ ~ ' ~ _ i^. r . ~j ' I ' • . ~ ~ 6r-~' d ~ . . : . . ~~~I ' Mi ~ ~ . • _ . . . . ~ -r ~ r ! • I~~r , I d J ~ ~ ~ ` I~ J'i=; ~ i . . . , • . . 1: . • . . F . I ~ y . . + ~ _ i ~ ; { r (x~ I . ~ t - i's' ~ ' ~~t~,; ~ - v1+' ~ t Rr, i I t ?.'Y ~ i , .z~ . - 1. r:. , 6 ~r.+a•L"~ n~ ~t ,4~~, ~ `~if ~ r . • . Y I r r. 1 j,+f 3:. ~ . . ~ ~r ' ~ , U w ~ ~ ~ x.. ~~'t~ y .~I : I l• I ~ 'I u . ~'i - . ~~y'~t3de4Y411-,x+^aLi+a4Ua,ptc+~?s ~-n - - ~ ~ aru • j ~ f ~!_F ~ f ~Yi~~-~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' ~ t{~6LL-1 ' A . / 1. ~ . _ _ . ~_~L..~ a . ::i. „ .4~_.. , ~ ' ~ ~ , c „ . _ •r ,.rt ~3 t _ . ~ , rr a -^c-~ r •~~w-~-~4a.:• ..sc. .,:.~-K J +a i'S,_ a .s'F-,?'b.. ~'r.~.« ~ - ~ , . f ~ 1~ . ~ii~i~! f . ~i ~ eC . ~ C-s~•~ P..^~'i " ' • I ..l J.. ~ . i x ~,:t,,.. y" 1 . . , . . i r _ _ ' . . i ~ - _ ~ • ' . . ' i.,- . . ' ~ ~I 4 d ~ I ~ . ~ i ~ ~ ~ I r~ 4. I a, F I I ~ ~ 1 '4 ? v { ~a a.i _ . O •y4~~ 4A' :'kN!''3T~.e~4.; . . . .ST . • ~ yi?+- ~ . ~.n• ~.~C'~r~w~,~~. ~ _ "b' ....1: ~ _ 4 11 _ a L tj~r - MEMORANDUM EXHIBIT F TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: September 30, 1993 SUBJECT: RNuesf for the estabiishment ofi a Special Development District to ailouv the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club located at 352 Eas4 fiAeadowr ~ Drive. A.pplicanf: Vail Athletic Club ' Planner: Shelly Mello . . . :•.y... ~.v,•:.,,.:,.,,,»,•:::::..v x~::~.:: , . • . . . ~ ~ . . ':~~;:::i::::::~;:':;';;::'_;~ %_'::'~:'•f~:~:::;:~:::::;;:~i?:~':`~;?;:~:::5:::::::::::::::;:::: ~::$::':;ty;:y~i:;~:;<:<~':`:%%;t~'i:~:~:~';tt>Si:`•`.•::~: i:~::::;~'::::::;:;~:;~:;:;;:;:;: ~ : .......i........ ti~: v On September 27, ,1993,-fhe Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) reviewed a request from the owners of the Vail Athletic Club for the establishment of a Special Development District: This meeting was the final hearing after a series of three worksessions uvith the PEC and Design Review Board (DRB) beginning in June of this year. Attached please find a copy of staff's memorandum dated September 27, 1993 regarding the details of the applicanYs request. The PEC voted unanimously to approve the project with Jeff Bowen making the motion and Dalton 11Villiams seconding the motion. In addition •to the staff's conditions which required the following: 1. The applicant permanently restrict the proposed 52 AUs as short-term rental units and that the 52 AUs shalf not be subdivided in the future 4o allow for individual ownership. The Condominium Declarations shall be amended to include 4his point before an occupancy permit will be released for the projecf. 2. The applicant provide one 1 bedroom and one 2 bedroom employee housing unit and restrict them per the Town of Vail Employee Housing Ordinance. The employee housing restriction agreement shall be signed- and submitted to the staff for approval before a building permit will be released for the project. The proposed employee units shall provide housing for a total of 6 employees. The units shall meet fhe minimum standards specified in the Town of Vail's Employee Housing Ordinance. Further, the PEC recommended the following conditions: 9. That three of the parking spaces currently being proposed cn the site for the incremental increase in required parking shall be removed and the applican4 shall pay into fhe parking fund for these three spaces ($8,000 per space =$24,000). UVith this provision, the applicant shall remove the two eicterior parking spaces adjacent to fhe structure en4ry and Yhis area shall be designated ~ 1 ' r - for load;ng and delivery. An additional space within the interior of the parking structure shaii also be removed from the proposal. This condition was due to the PEC's concem with the ability of the parking structure to function with twenty-seven interior valet parking spaces. , 2. That the applicant work with the DRB to develop a landscape plan on the south side of the building between the building and the streamwalk with the goal of returning this area to a more natural condition. This work includes improving and allowing public access through the property via the existing bridge and path on the southwest corner of the building and removing the existing sod and reseeding the area with a natural grass seed mix and possibly adding addifional planting. The area to be returned to a natural condition begins just south of the willows adjacent to the VAC and extends south to the streamwalk. 3. That the DRB review the architectural details of the building further to insure that there is adequate architectural relief in the window mullions, trim, etc. 4. That the applicant work with the DRB to improve the signage, landscaping and general of East Meadow Drive as it intersects with Blue Cow Chute particularly the north side of East Meadow Drive. The objective of this effort is to not only _ to improve the pedestrian character of this area, but to also deter unnecessary vehicular traffic from entering East Meadow Drive. O.shellyUnemos\vac.930 . 2 ~ ' • MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: September 27, 1993 (Corrections rnade September 279 9993 are In bold.) SUBJECT: ,4 request for the estabiishmenf of a Special Development Dis4rict 4o allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadowr Drive, and rriore specifically described as follows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail ViIlage, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of sa;d Tract B; thence N 79°46'00° W aJong the Northerly line of Vail Village, Frst Filing, and along the IVortherly line of said Tract B 622.86 feet; thence S 06026'52" W a distance of 348.83 feet to the Southwest corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, said corner also being the True Point of Beginning; thence S 79004'08" E and along the Southerly line of said parcel 200.00 feet lo the Southeast corner thereof; thence N 62052'00" E and along the Northerly line of that parcel of land described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said parcel of land; said corner being on the Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27°13'37" W a distance of 77.37 feet along said Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89029'22" W a distance of 12.80 feet to the Northeasterly corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence fVorthwesterly 26.51 feet along the arc of a 37.50 feet.radius curve to the leit having a central angle of 40130'00" whose chord bears N 53°40'00" W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 73055'00" W and along said tangent 166.44 feet; thence N 85010'21" W a distance of 50.40 feet to the Northwesterly corner of the.Mountain Haus Parcel; thence S 02018'00" W and along the easterly line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of 100.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner thereof; thence S 45°13'53° E a distance of 38.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning, containing 30,486 square teet, more or less. Applicant: Vail Athletic Club Planner: . Shelly Mello < . . 0. PROJECT ONERVIENV The applicant is requesting a review of the proposed establishment of a Special Development District (SDD) for the redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club located at 352 East Meadow Drive. The Vail Athletic Club is located on the southwest corner of Vail Valley Drive and East Meadow Drive at the bottom of Blue Couv Chute. The property is currently zoned Public Accommodafiion and is considered to be nonconforming with regard to developmenf standards. The applicant has indicated that Yhe purpose of requesting a SDD for this property is to improve the appearance of the building and site as well as make it a more viable hotel. The proposal includes the deletion of six dwelling units, the addition of tnrenty-four 1 accommodz'.:on units, a. decrease to the Club Area, a decrease in tota) restaurant area, modifications to the elevations, a decrease in common area and the addition of nine ° underground parking spaces. The four existing employee units will remain on-site and will be permanently deed restricted. The deviations from the Public Accommodation development standards include: 1. Densi . The proposed density #or the project will be 30.33 dwelling units (DU), which will include 52 AUs, 3 DUs and 4 employee housing units. The existing density for the project is 24.33 DU and the allowed density for the project 17.5 DUs. The total density increase is 6 DUs over the existing development and 12.83 DUs ovet the allowable density. _ 2. GRFA. The applicant is proposing a total of 32,282 square feet of GRFA. In addition to this, there is an overage on common area of 8,456 square feet. When this is added to GRFA, the total.GRFA for the project will be 40,738 square feet. The allowed GRFA/Common Area for the project is 32,924 square feet. Currently, there is 33,902 square feet of GRfA in the project which includes overages on common area. This results in a total increase of GRFA/Common Area of 6,836 square feet above the existing development and 7,814 square feet over the allowable GRFA/Common Area. 3. ' Common Area. The applicant is proposing to reduce common area, however, the existing project is in excess of the allowed common area by 13,541 square feet which is added to the GRFA. The proposa( would exceed the allowable common area by 8,456 square feet. 4. Heiqht• The existing building is 67 feet in height on the south elevation and 59 feet on the north elevation. The allowable height is 45 feet. The applicant does not propose to increase the ridge height, however, dormers will be added to both the north and south of the building where the ridge heights exceed the 45 foot height allowance. 5. Site Coverape. Currently, the site coverage for the project is 20,796 square feet. The apptication will increase this to 21,350 square feet. Which includes the underground . parking and service areas. The allowed site coverage for the site is 16,767 square feet. 6. . Accessorv Use. The accessory use allowance is 10% of existin GRFA. If built as proposed, this project would have an accessory use allowance of 3,228 square feet. As proposed, the allowable accessory use will be 3,426 square feet. This is a reduction from the existing 4,066 square feet. However, there is still an overage of 198 square feet. . 7. Setbacks. The applicant proposes to add building along the north side of the project. This will be in the area of the entry and the restaurant. The addition of the entry will result in a 1 foot setback from the property line. The existing parking structure has a o foot setback. On the south side of the project, the applicant i s proposing an at grade terrace which will have a minimum seffiack of 2 feet. The required setback in this area would be 10 feet. In addition, other areas of the building which are currently in the . 2 setbacks will be infilled. This includes an area on 4he northwest comer as well as decks along the rear of the building. The dormers will also be increasing the amount of buiiding in the setbacks. The applicant has proposed to do the following with the application:° 1. Decrease the amount of GRFA alloca4ed 4owards dvvelling units and increase the amount of GRFA for accommodation units. 2. Decrease the number of dwelling units and increase Yhe number of . accommodation units. 3. Encroach further in4o the front setback with _entry and second-story accommodation unit as well as an addition to the restaurant fo the east of the entry. ~ . 4. Increase common area vvhile decreasing the area allocated 4owards accessory uses and athletic club use. 5. Add dormers to the building on the north and south side which do not exceed the existing ridge height of the building. Insert decks into the roof structure on the south elevation. 6. Increase the amount of site coverage as a result of the new entry and restaurant addition (554 square feet). 7. Add terrace and expand dining deck on south elevation. 8. Removal of deck on the south elevation which currently encroaches onto public land. 9. The applicanf is proposing to meet the incremental increase in parking . requirements. There is an existing deficit of 58.44 spaces on the site. The new parking is located in the following manner: -2 spaces built underground belowr the entry , -2 spaces added by relocating an existing ski storage area -2 spaces added by relocafing the laundry room -1 space added along the south side of the parking structure -2 sQaces in central area of parkinq structure 9 total 10. Change exterior materials of building. This includes stucco, wood trim, deck railings and a wood shake roof. 3 11. Add-s!reetscape improvements. These include: a 6 foot heated concrete paver • walk along West Meadow Drive, an 8 foot heated concrete paver walk along - Vail Vailey Drive extending over the Gore Creek bridge and street lamps. The ' pavers on the bridge will not be heated. 12. Relocation of existing trash area and removal of the existing trash facility which . is encroaching onto adjacent properties. 13. The applicant proposes to provide one two-bedroom employee housing unit . within the Town of Vail which will be restricted according to the Town of Vail ' employee housing requirements. 14. Additional landscaping on the north and south sides of the building. 'For further details on the deviations please see Section III, Zoning Analysis, of this memorandum, which specify the changes in development.standards for the project. Also, please see applicant's description of proposal for specific details. 11. BACKGROUND A. Project History The Vail Athletic Club was originally developed in 1977 and included a mixed use building with condominiums and accommodation units as well as the health club facility and offices. Twenty on-site parking spaces were provided for the project and a variance was received for the remaining required spaces. Per the file records, it appears that the variance was granted in order to facilitate the construction of hotel rooms which were needed in the community at the time. In 1977, it was felt that it would be reasonable to grant a parking variance for the sixteen parking•spaces for this property due to the proximity of the Town parking structure. . Parking variances for four additional spaces have been granted for the project.since that time. In addition, while variances were not granted for height or density, the project was allowed to deviate from these standards. Setback variances were granted in 1977 for the development of the project. The property has been the subject of numerous redevelopments over a number of years and subsequent parking variances. . At the time of the project approval in 1977, it was discussed that possibly a portion of the property which the Vail Athletic Club had acquired would not be counted towards their developable site area. Research has been conducted regarding this issue to determine whether or not that was actually done. The staff has found no definitive information which would indicate that this was completed. B. Previous PEC reviews On June 28, 1993, a joint worksession was held with the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Design Review Board. (DRB) to discuss the establishment of an SDD for this site. At this time, the applicant was directed to work with the existing volume of the building. It was also indicated that it might be acceptable to expand the building adjacent to the Mountain Haus. It was stated that some expansion would be acceptable on the 4 . southwes4 corner and tha4 no additional development should be proposed on the north side of the building. In addition, fhere was a concern with the additional shade/shadow being cast on Nleadow Drive. in regard 4o parking, the PEC indicated tna4 the applicant should strive 40 accommodate parbcing on-site. On Tuesday July 93, 1993, a vuorksession was held with the Town Council regarding the parking for this project. During 4his discussion, three of the Town Council members were open to discussing fiurther the possibifity of pay-in-lieu parking for this site. Three of the Town Council members #elt that the ,app(icant should accommodate parking on-site due Yo the already significant overage ofi parking which is not provided on the site: As a result of Yhis discussion, the applicanf has provided an additional nine parking spaces on the site which will accommodate all of the increases in parking generated by the renovation of the building. On Juiy 26, 9993, an additional worksession was held with the PEC. Please see the attached minutes which detail the discussion 5 M. ZONING Aivt1LYSIS - Listed below is the zoning analysis for itie Vail Athletic Club SDD proposal. ALLOWED DEV. EXISTING PROPOSED - STANDARDS DEVELOPMEtJT DEVELOPMENT Site Area: 30,486 sq. ft. 30,486 sq. ft. 30,486 sq. h Setbacks: 20fee1 north: -0- north: -0- south: 2' - 26' south: 2' - 26' 0' (decks) -04dedcs) east: 12 - 20' east: 12 - 20' , west: 12' west: 12' . Helght: '*eet 67 south; 59 north 67 south; 59 north Slte Coverage: 16,767 sq. ft. • 20,796 sq. ft. , 16,300 sG. ft. + 5,050 sq. ft. - 21,350 sq. ft. includes • garage and below grade , service area on east side. Landscaping: 9,145 sq. ft. 9,071 sq. ft. 9,730 sq. ft. (including at-grade decks) Uolts: 25 units per acre 28 AU + 9 DU - 23 DU(2 LO)"°' 52 AU + 3 DU a 17.5 units + 4 emp units" = 24.33 DU(2 LO)' , 29 DU (2 LO) + 4 emp units = 30.33 DU (2 LO) GRFA: 24,388 sq. h. (80%) 10,927 AU f 8,122 DU 24,647 AU + 6,252 DU - 19,049 sq. h. - 30,899 sq. ft. + 1,383 + 1,312 emp units - 20,361 emp unhs = 32,282 + 8,456 + 13,541 common = 33,902 common overage = 40,738 Accessory Use: 10% of eAsting GRFA 2,036 sq. h. (Allowed) 3,228 sq. h. (Allowed) Restaurant: 3,606 sq. ft. 3,285 sq. ft. Club Retail: 460 sq. fl. 141 sq. ft. Total: 4,066 sq. ft. 3,426 sq. ft. Common Area: 8,536 sq. ft. (35%) HaIIs/Mech: - 19,235 sq. fl. 14,265 sq. ft. Con(erence: 2,842 sq. h. 2,727 sq. fl. Total Common: 22,077 sq. ft. 16,992 sq. fl. (13,541 sq. h. overage) 8,456 sq. h. overage) Club Area: 22,257 sq. ft. 20,881 sq. ft. Parking Garage: 4,131 sq. ft: 5,512 sq. h. Totaf Building Square Footage:"' 72,892 sq. ft. 79,093 sq. R. 6 - Partcing: ~ 20 on-site due to 20 29 (242% compact) approved variances. Hells/AAech: -0- -0- Gub Area: -0- -0- Retail: 1.84 parking spaces .47 parking spaces . Conference Area: 11.8 parking spaces 1129 parking spaces Restaurant: 22.5 parfcing spaces 20.3 parking spaces AU: 21.8 parking spaces 44.75 parking spaces DU: 16.5 parlcing spaces 6.5 parking spaces . Emp Units: 4 parkino spaces d parking spaces Total Parking: 78.44 parking spaces 87.31 parking spaces (8.87 w 9 space inaease) ° A bckoff is an accomrtmdation unii which is attached to adwelling unit and is no larger than one-third oi the total floor erea of the dwelling unit. Required by the Vail Town Council in 1977. Units are to remain on-sile tor the (ife of the building. Eacfi employee unit counts as .333 unes towards density. Indudes GRFA/Accessory Retail/ReslauranUClub/Common/Parlcing. There is a total increase of buifding area oi 6,201 sq. n. The memorandums on the Vail Athletic Club condominium conversion process indicate that 24 AU and 5 DU were rental restricted and 2 DU were approved with no restrictions. There are no file records which indcate the approval of the 4 additional AU's and 2 DU's cuRently on-sile. 0!/0 CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALIJATING TFi1S PROPOSAL ,4s stated in the Zoning Code, the purpose of Special Development Districts is as follows: "The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use: to improve the design character and quality of new development within the Town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utifities; to provide the natural and scenic.features of open space areas; and to further the overall goafs of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive . Plan. An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction writh the property's underlying zone district, shafl establish the requirements guiding development and uses of property included in a special development district." . The staff finds that the application meets the purpose of the Special Development District. Specifically, staff finds that this application furthers the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. The project proposes to improve the design character, function and quality of the development and provide additional short-teRn units within Yhe Village which is a specific goal of many elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The staff as well as the PEC have identified in past reviews that this site is appropriate for increased densities as well as a variety of uses due 4o the location and proximity to the Village core area. in addition, employee housing and streetscape improvements are proposed which provide overall community benefit. Staff recognizes that the existing building exceeds fhe underlying zoning requirements, but believes that due to the site and location it is suitable to allow for such deviations as proposed in: ffie application given the goals and policies in the Town's Land Use Plan, Vail Viflage Master Plan and Streetscape Plan. Please see Section VI for gurt er details on these p ans. _ 7 V. SPECIAL GEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CRITERIA The following nine criteria should be used to.review the project. A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. . Massinq The staff feels that ihis criterion is especially important to the review of this project. While this application does not propose to increase the maximum ridge height, the proposal includes adding dormers to the existing roof. The amount of building area is increased with building infills and the introduction of a series of doRners. On the south side, roof cut outs are being used for the three central top units. Otherwise, dormers have been added to both sides of the roof form in order to utilize existing "dead" space. The applicant has also modified the roof form on both the east and west elevations of the building. The east elevation terraces back from Vail Valley Drive and additional windows have been added to this elevation. Terracing has also been accomplished on the west elevation adjacent to the Mountain Haus. The low eave line which is maintained with this proposal and the landscaping of the site bring the scale of the building down to a pedestrian level. The staff feels that maintaining the pedestrian character of this area is important as it is . seen as a major corridor to Golden Peak and the Village from the parking structure and is also used by pedestrians to access Ford Park. The Vail Village Master Plan calls for this building to have a maximum of four stories. From the original application, the applicant has lowered the building to , the existing ridge line in all locations and decreased the scale of the dormers in order to decrease the shadow on East Meadow Drive. Sun/Shade The proposed building increases the amount of shade on East Meadow Drive by 5 feet 6 inches in the area of the entry, 24 feet 6 inches on the west wing . and 5 feet on the east wing on December 21st (See attached sun/shade analysis). The impacts on shade on September 21st will be an increase of 1 foot 6 inches in the. center of the building, 11 feet on the west wing and 2 feet 6 inches on the east wing. The amount of shade is determined by both the angle of the sun and the height of the ridge or eave line. While the December 21 st . date creates the most impact, the September 21 st date is what is specified in the code for sun/shade analysis in the CCI zone district. Although this property is not in CCI, the shade impact is important to address for this pedestrian area. 8 . The greatest impact in shade is seen on the west wing of the building. On December 21st, the proposed building will cast shadow onto the sidewalk. On September 21st, the increase in shade in this area will be 91 feet and does ' not cast shadow onto the sidewalk.' 9t should be noted that the existing . building casts shadovu beyond the sidewalk into the street in the center of the building and east wing. In the center and east wing, the additional shade cast will be 5 feet 6 ietches arid 8 ieet accardingly as a result of the dormers. The a.pplicant proposes to heat the paver sidewalk which wiff make this area safer for the pedestrian. The staff feels that the increases in shade have been minimized to a point fhat is acceptable. Entrv On the north side of the building, the applicant proposes to add a tvvo and a half story entry area to the building. The entry has been lowered by two floors from the original proposal. The design of the entry minimizes the mass+ng impacts of the element and does not add any more shade to the street. Buildinq FootRrint ' The applicant proposes to increase the building footprint by 450 square feet to allow for the restaurant addition and entry. Staff does not have a problem with the restaurant addition as no fandscaping is removed. The entry wi11 remove two to four trees which the applicant has agreed to relocate or replace. Streetscape The applicant has proposed to install reguired streetscape impravements discussed in section VI11 af this memo. This includes a heated paver walk along Vail Nalley Drive as well as a heated paver walk along the south side af East Meadow Drive. The driveway to the garage will also be heated. ln general, the project is sensitive to adjacent properties through the use of appropriate architectural design and massing as well as landscaping. B. Uses, actidity and density which provide a compatible, efificient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and actidity. Densit , The applicant proposes to increase the totai density of the project by six avvelfing units. This incfudes the removal of six chwelling units as well as the ° addition of twenty-four accommodation units. Of $he etine dwelting units on-site, siu are currently Pestric4ed per 4he .,Condominiurn Condersion requirementse Thsre are twa existing units which are free market and the applicant wishes to retain one additional unrestricted unit. The staff feels that because this unit is already restricted that it should remain available for short-term rental according to Section 17.26 of the . Subdivision Regulations, Condominium Conversion, or an employee housing unit should be provided in place of the restricYed unit as was allowed with the Vail Village Inn Goodes space, The staff would prefer to see an additional 9 employee housing unit versus the restricted DU provided as we believe the employee housing unit also prodides an important community benefit. The staft feels that the appiicanYs desire to increase the short term hotel units . is very positive. The GRFA attributable to ctweliing units has been decreased by 1,870 square feet. 13,270 square feet of £RFA will be added to increase the amount of floor area for accommodation units. The additional GRFA has been gained by using existing dead space within the building, using common area more efficiently, and the addition of dormers and infilling portions of decks on the south side: An additional 6,201 square feet of total building area will be added with this proposal. In order to insure that the AU's remain as short- term rentals, the staff requests that the owner agree to not subdivide the units in the future per the Condominium Conversion section of the Subdivision Regufations. Emplovee Housinq Currently, four employee housing units are required on-site per the 1977 parking variance. The applicant proposes that these units remain on-site and has agreed to restrict these units on a permanent basis. Due to the requested increases in density, the applicant has indicated that there may be an increase of two to four employees on the site. Utilizing the EmFloyee Housing Guidelines, based on the net increase in development over the existing building, two to four additional employees would be generated by the expansion. The staff woufd require that one two-bedroom or two one-5edroom units be provided to address the increase. The summary is as follows: a) BaNRestaurant = 321 sq. ft. (@6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 2.08 employees (decrease) b) Retail/Service Commercia! = 310 sq, ft. (@6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 2.015 employees (decrease) c) Dwelling Units = 6 units (@.4/room) = 2.4 employees (decrease) d) Accommodation Units = 24 units (Ca).75/room) = 18 emqlovee (increase) e) Total 11.5 or 12 employees •12 employees x.15 housing multiplier = 1.8 or 2 employees •12 employees x.30 housing multiplier = 3.6 or 4 emp(oyees •Assumina two emplovees per bedroom the proposed one two-bedroom unit would be needed per the employee generafion formula. The staff has used the . higher mu(tiplier due to the overages in density. The Employee Housing Report does not differentiate between the provision of an-site or off-site housing. As 10 : stated above, the staff would like to see one more employee unit provided in order to lift the use restriction on the proposed dwelling unit. C. Compl6ance with paPking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.52. ?arkin Parking 'has been a long standing issue on this site. In researching the history . of this project, the staff found that there uvere a number of variances granted to this project. In December of 1977, iwenty underground parking spaces were approved for this site. At that time, it was recognized that surface parking was not appropriate for this site and that these spaces wou(d be the maximum number that could be placed on the site. Different arrangements have been made over the years for parking on Town of Vail land as well as other properties for this project to address the deficit. Variances have been granted for a total of twenty spaces over the life of the project. Using today's standards, there is an existing deficit of 58.4 parking spaces for the project. There would be a nine space parking requirement increase as a result of this expansion. This is based on the difference between the required parking for the proposed project and the existing development. The applicant is proposing an additional nine on-site parking spaces which would bring the total on-site spaces to twenty-nine. All of the parking spaces would be valet. ' Currently, the applicant valet parks eighteen parking spaces in the existing structure. The parking structure will be expanded which will accommodate the nine additional spaces. Due to the type of use of this facility, valet parking is appropriate and has been approved for other projects of this nature. With the full-time concierge and valet, this type of parking solution is feasible. In addition, after reviewing the function of the existing facility, it appears that the proposed plan is reasonable and, the additional nine parking spaces can be accommodated. The two existing exterior spaces will remain adjacent to the , . entrance to the parking structure on the west side. No additional square footage has been added to the health club and therefore the staff does not feel 4hat it is appropriate to assess a parking requirement for this facility. Parking for a health club is determined by the PEC. There is no parking standard for this type of use. No parking requirement has been assessed in the past and the staff is not assessing any additional parking nor do we recommend to the PEC that a parking requirement be set as no club square footage is being proposed. ~ ~ 91 Load?^q and Delivery _ The appficant is providing a loading facility with a pull-out from East Meadow Drive. This wifl accommodate the short-term parking needs of the project. Loading and Delivery will also be accommodated in this pull-off area. The . applicant wilf no longer be allowed to unload deliveries afong Vail Valley Drive adjacent to the restaurant entrance. This is a very unsafe practice which the Town does not encourage and wi!l not allow fo continue. In addition, the applicant proposes to remove the existing trash facility on the west side of the project. This enclosure encroaches both onto Town of Vail land as well as Mountain Haus property. The applicant would propose to include the trash facility inside the building in this same area. D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plans. There are three other elements of the Comprehensive P(an which appiy to this appfication: The Vai( ViI(age Master Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan and ti'le Land Use Pian. Ptease see Sections VI, VII, and VIII of this memo for further descriptions of these plans. Many elements of the Town's Comprehensive Plan encourage the development and preservation of hote!-type units. The applicant - proposes to add an additional twenty-four AU's and delete six DU's for a total:of. fifty-two AU's and three DU's. This is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan's objective to increase the hotel bed base. Please see Sections VI, VII and V111 that identify the applicable goals and objectives of the plans. E. Identification and miiigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. This site is located adjacent to Gore Creek. No portion of this proposal encroaches into the 50 foot stream setback or the one hundred year floodplain. F. Site plan, bui(ding design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functiona( development responsive and sensitive to naturat features, vegetafion and overafl aesthetic quatity of the community. Buildinp DesiQn While the changes to the site plan through this proposal are limited, the building design changes significantly. In respect to the south or Gore Creek side of the building, the applicant is proposing to change the character of the efevation with the. enclosure and redesign of balconies and to change the window design. . Dormers will be added to the east and west wings and decks will cut into the roof form in the center area. The applicant has adjusted the south elevation to break up the facade per PEC and staff comments. Initially the applicant proposed to increase the height of the westem section of the building. 12 Currently, the appficanf proposes to maintain a11 of the existing ridge lines and not increase the ridge in any area of the building. The staff feeis that this is very positive. In addition, the applicant is proposing to add a terrace at the lower {evel on the south side of the projecf. This will encroach into 4he 20 foo4 settiack and result in a 2 foot setback a the tightest point from the south property line. On the norfh elevation, the applicant proposes to infill an area on the east wing adjacent to the restaurant and add an entry. In addition, balconies will be . added to units on the east wing. Dormers will be added in all 4hree areas on this elevation. This will allow for the additional accommodation units on the upper level. These additions will cast additiona) shade onto East Meadow Drive. Landscaping has been proposed along the retaining wall adjacent to the sidewalk on the north side of the building. This will increase the landscape • buffer between the building and the public area. The staff feels ihat this . additional landscaping is very important to the project as it will screen the building and mitigate both the existing and proposed impacts of the building. Buildin-q's impact on open space and veqetation The application impacts the existing landscaping on the north side of the building. Approximately two to four iarge evergreen trees will be lost as a result of this proposal. The applicant is proposing to (andscape along the new stone retaining wall adjacent to the west wing in order to better screen the building in areas where landscaping does not currently exist. The staff feels that while it is unfortunate that these evergreen trees will possibly be lost, the addition of landscaping which includes evergreen and aspen trees along the sidewalk, will mitigate the impact of the loss of these two to four trees. The applicant will attempt to save these trees. However, in the event that they cannot be saved as a result of this construction, the applicant does agree to replace the trees. The applicant has also added a 3 foot planting step to the . east of the existing at- grade parkin.g on the west end of the. building in order to . help screen the parking. The step wi11 afso reduce the height of the wall in this area. On the south side of the building, the applicant wiH be removing an existing deck which is currently located on Town ot Vail (and. The applicant proposes to add additional landscaping in this area which includes shrubs and aspen frees. This will buffer the building from the public area. Due to the amount of fand and landscapirig between the streamwalk and the building, adequate buffer areas are provided. The proposed landscaping adjacent to the building will be positive and will not hinder 4he use of this open space area on the south side of the building. The applicanf has also agreed to provide a maintenance agreement to the Town for this open space. 13 G. A circwlation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and aff-site traffic circulation.. The applicant proposes to add nine underground parking spaces. By adding , additional on-site parking, the vehicular traffic on East Meadow Drive will be increased. While it is an objective of the Streetscape Plan to make this area more pedestrianized, it is aJso an objective of the Vail Village Masfer Plan to have properties in this area provide on-site parking. The staff feels that the provision of on-site parking to meet the additional requirement is important given the constraints on parking our community must deal with. The applicant does propose to install an entry and pull-off in order to facilitate tfie drop-off of guests and loading and delivery. The installation of a drop-off area will be a benefit to the area as currently there is no off-street drop-off area for this building and the existing situation creates congestion along East Meadow Drive as guests and trucks park in the bus lane on Meadow Drive. The Town Engineer has signed off on this solution. With this application, the staff recognizes that it would be difficult to completely restrict East Meadow Drive from vehicular traffic, but would strive to limit the number of vehicles which must access East Meadow Drive. We also believe that by providing safe well designed sidewalks, pedestrian circulation can also be accommodated. The appficanYs proposal improves both pedestrian and - vehicular circulation in an area that currently must provide for both uses. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize . and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. Due to the installation of the pull-off and entry and relocation of the retaining wall in this area, two to four evergreen trees could possibly be lost. The applicant has agreed to attempt to save these trees, however, it would appear that this may not be possible. The applicant does agree to replace these trees in addition to increasing the landscaping along East Meadow Drive between the building and the roadway adjacent to the sidewalk. Trees.in the 30 foot range will be required to replace the trees that may not be able to be relocated. The new landscaping in front af the building includes evergreens that range in size from 10 to 15 feet and aspens having a minimum of a 3 inch caliper. To the east of the main entry to the building, the applicant is proposing to redesign the sidewalk as well as the landscape area. This will involve cutting back the existing utility grate and bringing the landscape down to the same grade as the sidewalk. This is accomplished by moving the sidewalk and curbline to the south from the existing location. Landscaping will atso be added on the south elevation in the area where the existing deck is being removed. Aspen tress and shrubs will be added to this . area and the grades will be redone to match the existing topographic conditions. 14 The Baradscaping on-site will be increased as a Pesult of the removal of an abode gPade deck. With this application, 4he project vbill be 6n. compliance with $he landscaping requirernent for the siteo 1. Phasing plan or subdieision plan that witl main4ain a workable, functionaY and efficient Pelationship throughout the development.of the special developrnen4 districte The applicant has not proposed that the construction of this project be phased. V80 !lAVL LAND USE PLAN The goals contained in the Vail Land Use P(an are to be used as adopted policy guidelines in the revieuv process for new development proposals. The Land Use Plans Goals/Policies applicable to the Vail ,4thletic Club redevelopment are as follows: 9_9 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environmenf, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1_2 Ttie quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 3_2 The Village and Lionshead areas are the best location for hotels to senre the future needs of the destination skiers. . 3_3 Hotels are important to the continued success of the Town of Vail, therefore conversion to condominiums should be discouraged. . . 4_2 Increased density in the core areas is acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is presenred through implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. 4.3 The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail and should be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, small fown feeling, mountains, natural setting, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental qualiry.) 5_3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with . appropriate restrictions. 15 5_5, The existing employee housing base should be preserved and . upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be_ accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. The application meets the goals and policies in the Land Use Plan. The addition of short-term hotel rooms is a very positive addition to this area. Item 4.2 specifies that increased densities in the core are acceptable if the character of the area is preserved. The applicant proposes to change the character of the building by changing the materials and design details of the building. While the proposal increases the size of the building, the staff believes that the applicant has attempted to utilize the unused interior spaces of the building to minimize the expansion on the exterior of the building. The scale and design of thebuilding with the addition of new materials and landscaping maintain the alpine character of the development. V!!. VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN The proposed redevelopment of the Vail Athletic Club carries out many of the goals and objectives contained in the Vail Village Master Plan. Appficable goals and objectives are as follows: Goal #1 -Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. , Obiective 1.2 - Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and-_ commercial facilities. Goal #2 - To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-round economic health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. Obiective 2.1 - Recognize the variety of land uses found in the 10 sub-areas throughout the Village and allow for development that is compatible with these established land use patterns. Obiective 2.3 - Increase the number of residential units available for short term - overnight accommodations.. Policv 2.3.1 - The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels • are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term ovemight rental. , Obiective 2.5 - Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. . Policv 2.5.1 - Recreation amenities, common areas, meeting facilities and other amenities shall be preserved and enhanced as a part of ariy redevelopment of lodging properties. 16 , Obiective 2.6 - Encourage the deve{opment of affordabie housing units through Yhe efforts of the private sector. ' Obiective 2.6.1 - Employee housing units may be requirecl as part of any new or redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning. Goal #3 - To recognize as a top priority fhe enhancement ofi the waiking experience . throughout the village. . Obiective 3.4 - Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access. . Goal #5 - lncrease and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation ' and circulation system throughout the Village. Policy 5.1.1 - For new development that is located outside of the Commercial Core l Zone District, on-site parking sha{I be provided (rather than paying into the parking fund) to meet any additional parking demand as required by the zoning code. Policv 5.9.5 - Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide underground or visually concealed parking. . Obiective 5.2 - Encourage the use of public transportation to minimize the use of private automobiles throughout Vail. Although this location is not addressed in any sub-area concept of the Vail Village Master P1an, it is discussed with regard to the height of buildings. The Vail Village Master Plan specifies that buildings adjacent to Gore Creek should have a height of four stories. The existing buifding is four stories along East Meadow Drive. The proposal builds into the . existing roof to form a fiith floor. This is being accomplished by adding dormers, infilling portions of decks an the south side, and using existing common area and dead space in the . roof form. Rlone of the ridga lines will be increased and a11 of the existing eave fines will be maintained. This application addresses the four Vail Village Master Plan goals which are applicab4e to the site. It also meets the twelve policies and objectives which are applicable. !/alB. STREETSCAPE RNASTER PLAN The Streetscape Master Plan points out that traffic on Vail Valley Drive is very heavy throughout most of the year. It is especially heavy in the moming and late aftemoons during . the ski season, and evenings and uveekends during the summer months. Pedestrian traffic has increased because of the expansion of the Village Parking Structure and the creation of a new eastem exit portal from 4his facility a4 Vail Valley Drive. Specific improvements for Vail Valfey Drive in the area of fhe Vail Athletic Club include the addition of an 8 to 10 foot wide. heafed concrete unit paver walk on the west side of Vail Valley Drive extending over the 17 • . bridge at Gore Cre& and a 6 foot wide concrete unit paver walk on the south side of East Meadow Dcive. The applicant has included these improvements in this app(ication with the exception that only a 6 foot walk is being proposed along Vail Valley Drive due to site constraints and 8 feet along Meadow Drive. IX. STAFF RECOMMEPJDATIONS , The staff recommends approval of the application. We find that the proposal has developed into one which is in compliance with the objectives and purpose section of.the SDD zone district as well as the other Comprehensive Plan elements as described in the memo. The approval includes the following understandings: 1. That the owner will permanently restrict the 52 Aus as short-tenn rental units , and that the 52 Aus shall not be subdivided in the future to alfow for individual . ownership. The condominium declarations shall be amended to include this point before any occupancy permits will be released. 2. In addition to the one.two-bedroom permanently deed restricted employee , housing unit, the owner shall provide one-bedroom employee housing unit.to ' allow for the use restriction to be lifted from the restricted dwelling unit. The employee housing unit restriction agreements shall be signed and submitted for staff approval before a building permit will be released for the project. } ne follpwing items will need to be addressed further as the project develops into working drawings. . ~ 1. Engineered drawings will need to be submitted which address the streetscape improvements for review by the Town Engineer before a building permit is released for the project. The staff feels that the application is a positive one and does meet the goals and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive Plan. These include the Land Use, the Village Master Plan, Zoning Code and SDD Criteria. We rscognize that the proposal deviates from the existing . zoning. We recognize that it is important to increase accommodation units as well as maintain and improve existing buildings. in town in order to maintain the area. We feel that this is a site which can handle increased density and deviations from the site development standards which include height, density and site coverage while maintaining the existing scale and character of the neighborhood. c:lpecUne mos\vac.927 18 1 - . i • ~ • . ' • i ~ . dsv. n A,.r . -••~}----..1.. i , . , . , . .T , ~ . i . . - _ - - _~-I - - - - - _ iI~- - - I 1 ~°"•'~'7: ~ Lyjlj__.- M • . . , , Zr= . ~ ,a ~ r~> c ` MIR 1 . • . ~ . . . ~ . ~ • . • . . . • ( i, • • . I i ~ ~ • ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ' ~ • ~ . ~ ~ . ~ , . ~ i ~ . • ! i ~ ~ . ~ i ! .VAILA7'lfl..ETiCCI.UB $ouW FJCVdtJpp FJ ~ ~ . ~ • . 1 N~d i O.R!~ ArtNSn 7mta VP.I1P ~ ~ . 1 1~aN~Ieb~f~MM~.~ _ . . . • ~ ' i.. ~Car.' w sa on p~ au ar c C7 q• 11 I ~ . . [ , a ~ ~ A MP A:~A2up, ~ ~ Tti~ . ~ ~ ~E~~ ~ ~ ? -t~'~-~"~ ~ M- - , . ~ . . ~ . a,....._ r 1 ' . . 9 . _ .D_. , ~ - ~ _ ....T 8 ~ I~ ~ • ~ ~ ~r - wO'. LU • . . ~ ~ ' • ~ ~ • ~ • ~ ~ ~VA~rr ~ r. MN' ~ / . • . . . I ~ { 1~ • - ' ' wr1+Y ~+~Y w~V • ~ • ' I I I?L~f LLtv/.i~orl . ' S~nt G6tv~t~o.~. . VAIL ATHI.ETIC CLUB Elevadons • ~ .......o...~ u... . . ~ McMd ~m+ctep. McL~oc~ faYr I~r ~ 1'-P . ~ an+~i~.rs».r.arr ww , ~....ausw~.a~.mw~ o.. 1~~1 •~t . . . . . . _ . ~ 1 ~1 r . • r . . . . . . . . ,i' . . . _i . . • _ • _ ~ . . . ' ' . . i _ . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ - _i!'• ~ - 71^--,~,_ _ " ' , • 1 • • ` o + 1q • 1e . p ~ n . . . Q 0 ;i. . Q 9 • L ' 7 ' • ' i ' I ~.wnw i~ . i ' r~ ~ i 1J 14 ' . 11L~=,.~-_ ~ .--~--~a.r ~si~- - . •_y- _ 'r-.~,~L` L . i -----~-----__T------------ ; r---_-• ~.m.~a~; e ~ v 1 ae I ne ~ n9 ~ v i. w' ~ u.+.r~ ~ ~..~..ca • _ - r--- { I f , • ..e w e. ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ' II ~ ` • ~ M\ . ~ • ` ~ ' \ ` • ~ ~1 ~ iN WMeO I bWwOe 1 Ow'1[+e? WvI1f. ~ m/Y~/R , ' ~ ~ ICwfT/iK . r . ~ , . . • 1 ~ 1 C r1M N ) w~yy ~p~+~-~-~ ~ i aw CWII• ~ 1 L-=.1 toao? I 1 ta. ~ I! r• . : ' . I r .L ~ ...mw..w t~~* . pp p~ ' • • ~+0°'1 ~ . • . ' ~ ~ ~ ..w ~.-.w~! ' ~I 'r"~ I ..~t..._._r r o r, - ' ~ i ' + II -r , ' ' _ ~ao.e ~a oow.l . • i' ~ ~ L • ~ ; ~ . . \ I119 . fl1 I 10. 0 Y 10.1 ~ p p ' ~ 1 j ~ \ I ' ~ . • • ~ 1 IJ~ 1~ L« ~ei/ 4. aNA ~ ~ . + . ~ t'. 1__~__~~~+ ~ • . . L ,,.,.~..e ,o..... a...,. ~ ~ ..4 - . -------=~---~1~____~;.. . . 1 ws.e..w.~~ Mf fb 9 . . . . r~? p+r~ ~'y ' • ' ~ i ~ ~ l we~c~e ac+w o. oo+'• u~a Oaw . . 00 i ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 . • - - - - :.._.VAIL ATFfl.EfIC CLUB lJppec liealth Club ' p.s uw a~v rNr .eo v~.raKt~ • • c-ym-:~.mem ms~» d,~, ? /~.1r w~nrr . s++.J.a ~1~t +f o . . `t~ " f'.~!' 41.w. 4.ev a.M4 . a waf+~-~`~^.~••e~.etor+iw'~Nlly.s?4)c:]~ctaM~r . ryv~ ' . ? W~ ~N'~ LL.9 •.1 ~ Ii.O Nr~.v4/rpfA 1~71 M TM ` . z~ ~.~.~I/?~! • ~p~ ~ ~.r~.~eo 9 1 . • , . ,v~~l0+r O ~ . • : mce nde,r.r.wrr eo 4 . ~ pcj~HLQ I~N V.L - lto • . PYY~L _ I 1-1 57 ~96~7~ww . • _ t _ e.. . . , .a~. ,~•»•90 lot-.6 rovv. /aajma. . cton'v 4 0 -f-c^ ( • ' :zzz~ / . ~ . ~ !1 n•w •w , n~.• ~ I O. ~ r .Yy~ ' I I ~ . • ~ ^ •I~ ~ ~_WI~•/~iM ~~II ~_~~~~_J ~ O ~w - ~ =yr~_ ~wfwyuvT_ • • ' . . p w 1~ 1 N-- i . • • 1 ~ ~-i ...a ~ ~ ' . • ~ t~ w H.~w1 . . . • ' . w ~ ~ MI•wr u~.wrr. ~ \ . e• " • ~ • ' \ ~ a ? ~ . ' i' ~ . • . • ,•w: ~::r; r»;.., ~R ' r • ~jl1l~ - ~ -o o - . , ~ r % ~ ~ i^ r` • 'i:«~ . ~ v ~ ' ~ ~y•'~~ • • V~.Y " . • w ~ \ U ~ . . • ~ ~ ~ ~.r : m ~ r ~ ~1---. o ' ~ ~II t ,V) w \ \ - ~ ' ~ {ww~ ~IY ^ \ • n \ f..... f~ 1.~.~:q ' i..:h ~Mwr) ~l <:v.l ~ ~ ~ . w . M~ ~ ' ~ . ; i . • l~r...ww r' cR... • r..~w r"i..... ~w~~~~ ...,...Y,~~ .,...w. H.«.w~. VAILATHLETICCLUB FltuFloorPlan.. 11ti~. 1f~1 ~1M1 • MI~~ ~I ?/VIr~~• ~l/+r> • K M'~ 11Mr V~N~ 1 IM. 1 w~ ?IMti ~+~~~y ~ r~~r.O~wW fW~Y 1Or7 1 L yt . t1~~ ~~~N ~~.~~1 ~I L~nIW. • 1~ I.~ti ~ 1~ M. 4~ OJ'~ 1~~n/~: ' . ~ tnf~.'_ - - IMt nf ' • . t .~-~.r• ~l. v ~ . Yr.~aM~• L W'.. . ~NWa14rtIry.ArtNrn .PMa M~~. ~{~~M M ~ r ' •ww..w6 Nr. ~~.~~1- 4,W . n,•~•+r ,l~--~•~.w~ ?.~+r 1u4.~~•b..awr.~nw.s~ . I.r./`~ , 1G'1~l£d.L!1FG~•. L°iGllr_.._~-- •yr~ 4~~ - . ~....+wr~«al+auar u.. 1•11•~: M.r•~a i+sawu..~n~. q~~q~ M~~q• I•h+~ ~..r..wv r r•. a•• . t- .io-. , hu~w/~r.ti/~rwl . . • 1 - Mw t 1` -~~q - H~n~ r • ~/K ~m~..w, r.-. /..i.q ~v f n... ir~..~ i ~ . . r ~ ta+a~ ' . r- r M1w.1 1 M1PM ' Mwd PW ~ . 'I 11Nr)~ ~i~.~~ ln.r ~ ~ • ? . ~ . , ' Mw ~ a~ = aa.o ^....o i,,,«, a...n ' : 6GO4 I N 'IJ\' I /bYlrVOef IP i I ir • ~ ~ ~ i . ~ • r ro+w.a...~ ve..~ ' " ~ _ ~ ~ .i • • ~ , ~p V..g.. ! '0' •M•~in ~ ~ ~~-5' _ ^ ; , IoI O , Irn ~vl ~ , Ivi-x p I. I ~~I Laxv I: ~ k~ ` ~ p Li(Nea/1 fWf) e / " '._J1 . . ~ / f~e.# M1w / r.M NtiA , 1 . ef ,Mwl ~ ~ / f•~ I I 1 _ , ~ ! I ' ~ ! ' I ~ . , ~ , . . F.,,, ~„e. r-a.».~ ~....e...~.. , dA1L ATHLECIC CLUB Second Flaos Plan h. p~a~.. A110w~ II.N 9we~ 9rn Wil,~.~sl C Ocs-4.Ovak# Cd ' . Wn•oa..y 9'M 4~ I.fO 969~ N• - PC<M~I 6aclay. Ncb~cxt fmGS LIR'~ {••O' Lf 6e~!!O isw !bv Inl M I91~ - 1`1 ~ ~ ~ y...~r~.ra..~ lleo q/ o . 14 b MA (:s LJ me P R~ ' h . R~+. 9 • a4 • 9*1 ~ ' . . . p~ ~ . ti~ ~L Iw~~ M • • I • ~1HL ~/1 ti ti~~ 1 ~ _ l~ • r \a~'~ {r Ml {H\ H1 ~ti1v) . w..~u' ' _ - - a - - - - - - a a ~ ~ 171. • _ ~ ~b . ~ - ^ . . • . ~ U • ~c ~ • ' . . , • . o... . . ~ (M~l M.A Iiry~.l I~+YI (w Vl (Y~1 Yl N~r Y) LMY) . . . . W rt W r~~ MI rM, M L r~? . . • ' v"~ o..~ e~.~, ~ ' • . . ~ I I ' I I I I I ~ I I ( I ~ ~ . . . ' . ~ .ynu.nrHt.erIccl.us 'Ihird Flooc Ptan ~ ~ • w~I'~ •~~1 M Il.l~. 1~ ~.~~l~aY~~~1..~1. r~.O~r.1V ii~1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ OV~v/l~V Iw.~.~I l~'MY~~w? . ~ . . nrr~ • . MAud 4n~T..4~t~M~r~ ~a~ I~I'. 1'~O ~ ~ 1 . . ?tn/..M f+~ Y V !~/..Irw~w.HN^~ ~ . { Y~ "L . . • . . . . , • . ' . . ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . . . ' ~ . ~ ' . . ' . ~ i, . ~ . ~ . ,s . . • - `M ~ a . • ~ ; i ,.,,,...svt ' . , . • . ~ I • ' - • . ' • ' Flttti Ftaas Platt - . ' , ' e``• • ~ , • . ~ ~ . • - r_ ' , i~ ' ~ - / • • . . . t~..? ~ ~y'y1 ~J j / / . ~ / ~v+,^ '.t`.• / i l. ~ ~ 1 yi . . • / f ' , M~ ~ / / ' t • , 1 ~ . . t : / t ,4.~ae ~ Y` /l. 1 , ' . . io ~ ' a ~ {,M.~;~~~ - R . . • ~ . .I ; ~ ~ L... w • ° ~I-~ j , ~ ' ~ . ~ i..:::.+' ~ . . , • l._-- ' . i"' ~ I ~ , . - < . . - ° ~ _ . • . ~ ~1-0~ . ~ , - , =~;a . - f ~ ~ ~ i~~n~ . ,~1 . , . . , _ ' , , y:. -1~~ . - ~ p , Ql yysw... ~~-~N, • y 9 ' ' - ~ i ~ ~ 4:. ~r . 'r • ~ ,..,,Vfti • /I , . ' a~ Mw. ~.L+ % s ` ',4..rr~ t • ~sx (rn"1 ' ' b = `~~l' / . ~ .1«1.:.4 i~"':r'^ ay ~ • , , . . / e6• • IM~\ /ti. 14nN1 1 ~J I . ' • , w~ir ~ ?a1°~ ~ ~ ~ q•..~ ~ = t ~ ' , ~ ~ • ~ • ~ Faucth Fl~f Plani . ' ~ ~ ` . • j YAfL ~T o tCCi.tJS • ' ' , ~1 O1 - ~.r"~.--+".~ . ` M F`. `L'o {:o' { . • - • _~L~i_.. ; ~ , t...~ ,y 0.7`v^o'. ~...r~.4M~""`iT' t~wrw.~~•,~~Yi~ t ~ 1•a.ya ' . ' 1..i.. Fe +r---- ~o.tm+..l•.se" i:..~"' i . • ' ' N~/M/ . . . . . , VAIL ATHLE'I'IC CLUB ~ September 11, 1993 SDD - ST_'AM2IIqT OF PROPOSID IMPRO The Vail Athletic Club (VAC) agrees as part of the implementarion of our SDD proposal to make the folloiving improvements: Tancisc_'anP - East Meadow Drive / Vail Vallev Drive The VAC will extend the curb anci sidewalk 6'-0" along East Meadow Drive and 8'- 0" along Vail Valley Drive to create a continuous, heated, rectangular concrete paver sidewalk extending from west end of the VAC service/parking drive on East Meadow Drive to the Gore Creek Bridge onVail Valley Drive. This will be coordinated with the toivn engineer. , tNe Nvill re-%dse the curb_line at intersection of East Meadow Drive and Vail Valley Drive in accordance with the "entry feature" concepts put forward in the Vail Vi.llage Master Plan and as shoivn on the site plan. At the "entry feature" and partially along Vail Valley Drive, we will el'uninate the existing retaining wali to bring the landscape down to the level of the side«,alk. We ivill reface the existing landscape retain.izig walls along the garage and Vail Valley Drive with stone. We ivill incorporate signage to inform vehicles that East Meadow Drive is a ".pedesti ian area" open only to vehicles on "official business" with the VAC and the Mountain House. We Nti711 %vork with the Design Re~Zew Board and AIPP to supplement the existing streetlainps along the VAC side of Vail Valley and East Meadow Drives. We will create a new car pull-off guest drop-off area directly in front of the new hotel/health club entiy. This area `vill be paved cvith granite pavers and heated. We ivill need consent from the towri's authorities that short-term parking in the opposite direction will be permitted here. The creation of the new hotel/health club entry and car pull-off along East Meadow Drive should result minimal disruption to the exisring vegetation in the landscaped area above the existing garage. All necessary steps will be taken throughout the course of construction to protect the existing vegetation. New drainage grates will be introduced to handle melting runoff at East Meadow Drive. This will be coordinated with the toivn engineer. We will replace the existing wood transformer grate with a new steel grate. ' I.an scane m Core C'reek / ~outb-Side . We will work dvith the gown to formalixe an informal gnai.ntenaace agreeffient regarciing the town°s pgoperty betweea the VAC and the peciestria.n path along Gore Creek. . We wiU prune the ciead brush in the area between the VAC a.nci Gore Cree.k We wiU reffiove the existing vvooci suncieclc that is partially on town property9 as well as the existi.ng wood utility shed by the hot tubs and the existing vvood trash sheci at the service/garage ciriveo We vvill create a landscaped path fram the encl of the existing service clrive/fire lane through to the town property on the south side of the VACe We wiU construct a new stone terrace at the existing upper health club/svvimm;ng . pool level along the south side of the builcii.ng as shown on the site plarie Buildinz Exterior VVe dvill restucco the entire outside of the buldinga The stucco color will be light, natural coloro T'here willbe a stone base by the new entrye We wiU be installi.ng a new wood shingle roof throughout We wiU be introduci.ng new wood t-im and roof overhangs as shown on tie elevationse We vvill be revising the existing porches, balconies anci decks with new vvooci tri,m to create the more trad.itional porches shown on the elevationso . Vile vvill be extendung the existi.ng di.ni.ng cleck along. the south sicle of the restau.rant to covnect with the new hotel loungeo We will be constructing a new on-grade hotel/health club entry on East Meaciow Drivee We vvill be exteaciing the north wall of the restaurant .6"-0" to the north anci filli.ng in asn existing 28" x 99 41i.I16denl6ildOd.b" along the south sicie of the c~ni.ng terrace. We vvill be installng new wood windows a.uci doors throughout . We will be adding new siormers at the fourth floor level along both the north and souti sicies of the existing stuctureo We will be acid.i.ng nevv chLmneys throughout for the new gas fireplaces. Interior Imnrovement-s - H al hCltih The improvements- to the health club will not be extensive, they will focus on increasi.ng the spa and cardiovascular capacity of the club and adding new door's and windows along the south wall of the upper level in order to introduce more natural light i.nto the club. Most areas of the club stay as they are. We will be adding new floors at the upper health club level above the weight room and the existing racquetball court . We will be creating a new staff locker/lounge area at the Iower health club level. . Interior Imnroveinents - C;arag.e . ~ Our SDD proposal will create the need for an add.itional P cars to be parked on site. We will be relocating a portion of the existi.ng Iaundryfacility to create room for 3 add.itional cars and eliminating two storage rooms to create room for an additional . 4 cars. The rema;ning 3 cars will be accomodated within the existi.ng garage , through a valet parking arrangement Interior Improvements - Hotel We will be creati.ng a new double-high hotel lobby and Iounge area which will connect to the new hotel/health club entry. There will be a new open sta.ir to abalcony above the lobby at the second floor. We will be renovating a.nd revising the existing conference room on the first floor, addi.ng a new boardroom at the second floor and creating a new meeting room along the south side the first floor of the building. We will be relocati.ng two employee units from the fourth floor to the first floor. The other two employee units will be relocated to the third floor. These un.its will be maintained on-site, as per a previous agreement, for the life of the structure. We will be eliminating 6 existing DU`s and adding 24 new AU`s to create a new room mix of 3 DU's and 52 AU's. The average size of our new hotel roonl(AU) -will be increase by 54 square feet to 478 square feet from 424 square feet All of the existing hotel rooms will be totally renovated. All of the bathrooms will be renovated a.nd made larger. . Jioterior Ymnrovements---Hea" Club • . - The improvernents to gh.e health club will not be extensive, they will focus on ~cre.a.sing ~e s~ ~d cardiovascular capacity of the club and aclding nevv doors and vvindovvs along the south vvall of the upper level in orcler to introduce inore natu,ral light into the clube lvlost areas of the club stay as they are< We will be aciding new floors at ttie upper health club leve1 above the weight room and the exi.sting racquetball co~ We wi1l be rreati.ng a new staff locker/louage area at the lower health club levelo . Interior° Im~ ovem nts - Carage . . Our SDD proposal will create the neeci for an adciitional ~O cars to be parked on site- We will be relocating a portion of the existing laundry facility to create room for 3 add.itional cars aaci eiuninati.ng two storage rooins to create roorn for an additional 4 cars. The rem ''ng 3 cars will be accomociated dvit.hiri the existing garage . through a valet parki.ng arrangement Interior Tmnrovements - Hotel . VVe will be creati.ng a new double-high hotellobby and lounge area which dvill connect to the neda hotel/health club entryo There will be a new open stair to abalcony above the Iobby at the second floore dVe will be renovati.rlg and revisin.g the existi.ng conference room oa the first floor, addi.ng a nevd boardroom at the second floor and creating a nedv ineeti.ng room along the south sicie the first floor of the builcii.nge btle vvill be relocating two employee u.nits from the fourth flovr to the first floaro The other two employee un.its will be relocated to the thirci floora These units will . be maintai.ned on-site, as pe.r a previous agreement, for the life of the structuree VVe vvill be eluminatin.g 6 existi.ng DU's and adciing 24 new ALT`s to create a new rooffi mix of 3 DU's and 52 AU'sa T'he average s3ze of our new hotel room (AIJ) -will be m1crease by 54. scgua,re feet to 478 square feet from 424 square feet All of the existing hotel rooms will be totally renovatecio AlI of the bathrooms vviil be renovatecl and made largere ~ . , . Q I,er Imnrovements Most of the existing ffiechaiucal systems will renovatect and reIocated to a plenum above the existing double-high space at tae restaiarant or to a new gnechan.ical room at the lower health club leveL . We will be installing a new 5-story9 hydraulic, passenger elevator vvith.i.n the existing shaft to serve the hotel and health dubo • We will be installi.ng a nevd 5-story, hyciraulic freight elevator for "baclc of the house" servicese The exist3ng dumbwaiter at the west enci of the buildi.ng will rema.i.no _ . We dvill be imstalli.ng a trash coffipactor and roll away trash conttainers to ha.ncile the hotel/health club trasho The restaurant grease and trash will be lzandled i.n a- similar wayo 'I'rash storage will be at the west end of ttie buildi.ng and at nevv trash strorage closet at the garage. VVe wiIl be adding a spri.nl-ler system to the hotel portion of the buildi.ng. The entire buillcling will be brought up to the current handicap requirementse Schedule . We hope to start consti-uction in the spri.ng of 1994 and open the renovated VAC i.n by the start of the 1994-5 slu seasono . . . _ t - request. The PEC asked staff to pass on to Council that they supported the Council's efforts to permanently restrict the six existing employee housing units. 4. A request for a worksession for the establishment of a Special Development District to atlow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Ciub, loca4ed at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as foliows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Yail Village, First Filing, Tcwn of Vail, Eagle County, Cobrado, more particularly descnbed as follows: Cammencing at the Northeast comer of said Tract S; thence N 79046'00' W along the Northerly fine of Vall ViUage, First Filing, and along the Northerfy line of said Tract B 622.86 feeh, thence S.06026'52' W a distance of 348.83 feet to the Southwest comer of that parcel of land descnbed in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in.Receptian No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, said comer also being the True Point of Beginning; thence S 79°04'08' E and along the Southerfy tine of said parcel 200.00 feet to the Southeast comer thereof; thence N 62'52'00' E and abng tfie Northerfy line of that parcel of land described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded 'm 1971 In the Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78 feet to the Northeasterly comer of said parcel o} land; said comer being on the 1Nesterly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road, as plaried in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27013'37" W a distance of 77.37 feei along said Westerly right-0i-way line of Gora Creek Road; thence N 891,29'22" W a distance of 12.80 teet to the Northeasterly comer of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Northwesterly 26.51 ieet along the arc of a 37.50 feet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40`30'00' whose chord bears N 53040'00' W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 73`55'00' W and along said tangent 166.44 teet; thence N 85010'21' W a' distance of 50.40 feet to the Northwesterly comer of the Mountain Haus Parcel; thence S 021118'00' W and along the easterty line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of 100.00 teet to the Southeasterty comer thereof; thence S 451113'53" E a distance of 38.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning, containing 30,486 square feet, . more or less. Applicant: Vail Athletic Club Planner: Shelly Mello Shelly Mello made a brief presentation per the staff memo and stated that her presentation would focus on the changes that had been made to the proposed Vail . Athletic Club expansion since the worksession with the PEC and DRB on June 28, 1993. Stan Cope stated that they were trying to create a hotel. He said that the proposed fifth floor would consist of loft bedrooms. He stated that he would like to see ihis property become a small hotel concentrating on suites. He said that they have decreased the dwelfing units in order to increase the combination accommodation units. He stated that their goal was to have forty-nine accommodation units. He stated that the modifications tfiat they had made were an attempt to address the concems that the PEC members had from the June 28, 1993 worksession. Kathy Langenwalter stated to the PEC members that she would like them to comment on whether the SDD process was appropriate for the project. . Planning and Environmental Commission Juty 26, 1943 4 I . ' r • l r~ ~ ; • i P~~ ; • . ~ I Z ~ ' . ~ . . 7 ~ EA41 Muomw pa~~' • _ ' ~ / ~ ~ . , . ' ~ ' . ' . . ' • ~.e~n rvu,.,n ' • f • I , r~ nev a Heeo.,, ' IN.~ nMO o+a~~o ? re JI ' ~~`~w+~~. PCwryRy• i ~ ~ f ~af vnu.aY ra.,ecc / o , i•, ~y.~ / c ; l_:_~~s..:_ c.•' ~ ~ DPWa ; ~ ' ',~-Iwt n 4?/wp / w ~ iL- nrdi.en~ C-we ~ PwPa.eo eF ~o n~ i ' ' .evr or.o.w ruw • i,,t+i q - 'W,.ww ~ . . ~ . NoC e.+c++~ .~r~ ._t11 x tae~ua , I ~wuo r•tK 0 ay owow.•w. i~~14~'r oaye 1 + 'A 1 & ltrc ~at • o~, \ ' . . r er . . . . . a.~a • \ , ~ • +M pf~w/ ONW6 I VMI4 MAf~~~ ~ . ' W"w.a f , a.•n~ . . o~ ~u . ~ A-6 ~ . i tu e~ e~~i' f R*c 9r ; R+ f . ` . pyi,,,o _ . . (•.f ` L~~ y'.~...eree.,~ ~ ' w~., , ~ l ` \ ~ . ~i. . waow ' a r.a ~ o ~ f r-i ' ro•.~,,,,u / ~ \ i l., ; ; ~ ""''b R~vaa-.Nai:t~ V,41L ATHLETIC CLUB - Slte Plan . - MK'hid8atclayhilttt Sde Ii16•.1'•P :!t Ew iro tnn !i. M re.t M' laru . nffROK4Hnt~U~f~f ' ve-:rirweazl- 21:474 aseco~ b•t~•is . ' - / ~ ~ c ~c^aw p,~~.,c ~ . t.~ r~,~ • . .•r.c. ww,,.f pP'~ ~ ? ~ ~ ' n~ •n ~1 ~ ~ s •t CT~ t +a ~ 1 ,r°f •'t "t^~ ~ ' ~ • p •f f °f y.. r~ef y~IL _ pNJ~ 0 NJM~ tef ~ YNy htr:~tt~o • ~ „ ~ , . . + „ lJ n p p+.~c ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ . ' ' , ' '.?q-D ~ ~ Qey~ ~ . N' •In O . ~01( Y/ IWiIF ~ ~ . ' • /y~..rfM . ++iw'ue' ~iw aRwl- ~ b,~rt~~""r~4rn+?~ tMA'* . . . . . ~ 0?~iw~f4 ~~~~wt~ , Site CL VA~tLA~ SCNW ' • . tr. fa r ~ ~n 112 11 I~ l I~. I j1! Lll,j11J • ~ I i I ~ I «ow o ascr ^ TI' "~-w~w . v ~ ~ i~H~:.}i i~,. ~ y, ~ • E . . ~ o • 4 [w~a Iw' . ~ . ~ a w ~M. ~M~ . ~ rr.+ca stn.~• ~ . . '^~°".1. _ I~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~ I I I ~ IV~• +II i i• i~ ~ ~ ~ t~+ Ai%A Mq- - ~ L. ~~~~U? ~ ~ - h 1ULJ.W' q. a" ~ 1'~ __i ~ en~• - ~ 19 • . VAII ATNLETIC CLUB ~ Elevations . ~ w M=ft, onko, ve% cc!I ' NOV 17 195~ y ~ a~bo, n ~ I ~I,•:' ~ ~ ~ ~ . I 1 ~ ~ ~ d ~ • F r , p . __~VAIL ATNI.EfIC CLUB ._South Elevatic E2.t M..daw DrW~ VA cakw-'* 0 . \ / ~ . ~a a a ~u 4-4 • \ ~ ~ ~ ~ P, a~w«cu P wwwr Gw+i~t~.~w E MihCN'r LN~FLG+ Htr'~ tl~aCl~ ~uM µNAC« Iru~ ~ LIfAL~n6 VNf uiN4 ~ hrL(ioN A•^ hCl-111" h•D.:.'' LAnj SJI.14 , . I / l ~ /J' ~Ip ;y, ~ ~~~1MM(OU) Ia pw~ ~Yrt ~ . ~X DR . I / I SN ~Y ~ ? II M~ Lw..IM ~py~ VE E I ` 1 s~~ ~LL y~ I i . ~rr~w ~.ee~ ~.LL . I ~ ow. _ ~s ~eeY una~ 11 r - e~r.we J~. fa ~ ~ua R s ta? w.~ ~aJ d E ? . ~t.UG0.• ~~Ghew G•G A~rif.oN vO • LWiCIC " / .VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB Sections cme W~ u+w va. ea-ft rawd evdry. aaa«t sde: lA' . r• r „<<_ . r . . . ' L. M~~W . I . . ~ . , . . . . ~ DIC. ~ _ . . , . . . . , n/.i~./r. . . • i. ^ti/'~` - . ' . . _ "'/.n,~ ~ - . . " _ . _ } ~._...1 -3~_ ' . - - i• ~ : , ~ . . _ ' y« eev ~:r-? .._.1 ~ . . . 1 ~ ~ LNA N.b J . . ' . ; j - ' ; ; ~ . MtL wkeY ~ DtUVt . . , - i _ i • t . ' . , . i ~ i ~ . hirc rv.N I , i i ' r • - , I Iy. i 1 • • iw _ _ I_ • ~ n ~ I ~ ~ • ~f~. ~ I I f. . l{ i i M:~. lr'.•it:i . ,*y ' t~' I h iH~ : ; . . . . . ~ VNLATHI.6'(1CCLUB D- V.4 C.b.. . , I. ~ _ K I • ~aude~c~•,,+rc~ec+ ~r. ~ . . . ~ 231Gnl1lSeni A1~Ir1 m~rn ~ p o N~+A1. AePn+W+~ NW l+P~~evNwU~F ' ~wa N4~.FW, • I 1' 1 lI~1 lp.. ~ a J I I ~1 I , ~ ~T• . ! ~ C ~ C LN 4V~(MG ~aJM~ uoirX ~r , . II ~ ~ ~ 9 1 ~ . . . RY. f I 1,~~ ~ ~10. ~ .V ~ 1 11 VP,lL ATHLETIC CLUB Lo+wer Health Club [u ~a omo, v~ cm~do . ' WaM:O md.r. uchilecc Sdo: tio"-P•o' ~ . 275 Fait l lin Gtrr.e. 1N Yr.4. N1' tIrv11 K ~ i ` ~ '1 i,M woa"' G~ s• i I , rnu n ~MMf ~ D~ ' . ' owy 9nf N'~i . . Q G `J C ' . `M/" 13 o M~ ~ . . n ~-~j ~ nih~ (0 j~ . U /tVa .j t ~ lMW ~r 7 , ~ L, 1 v M~ hq - . . . ; Q UPPer Nealth CIt : VA~~ AT~IE~ U~ E.0 ~ d s or D~ Q w ~r o~ n p y . p^ J ^ 9 On ~w n0 . ~ . . w~at ^ ^ I ta+y. . ° ~ ~ ~ _.s~•. i~aaa.,u. . . or . 04 ~ ~ t HirL. 611M1. Mm~uo e~ Hmr.wet em~.s nva amw fuHl . ' i 1 • ' ~ . i ..,.i ` b er..a n. . . . - ' ~ ' ~ f. ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ^ v~ ~ ? I 4 . I ~ Q I 1 Q ~V w~rrn+ , 0 • i a ~ m \ A , 1/I M I/1+0 NM I VIM , ~ ` . wm u~w I i~~ ~o ue eo ~mnrst . I . yA ' I ~w - j ~ i I f--~-~---- ~ ~ . VAIL ATHLETIC CWB _ First Floor Pian . F' un Mae- omo. vA cob~ . . . Y+1+aN Pvrlw l~~~..~.n o ~ yu wy v1 , ' . 0 ~ ~ . I V voef ~I. O Q M ~ 00 c C; II ° co c C ~ 1 o0 ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~s~, ~ s~~ +o +~~•o ~ . i~r •o Y! ~v . II I ~ 1 . : VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB Second Floor Plan oltl., vr. c-M-ft lidud Bad~Y~ Arda1M N~k: 1/C•1'•0' . ' 235 Em illh Siier• r~. M' ~~7 p ~ 1N M~ I , by ww !10 ~ • . ' ~ f.ey _ ~ . I ~ - L7. ~ ~ ~ Q.Q... .'Y•::: " [t:i::it:[tti . . ~r..w.a w. , . , ~ . . .;r....:. . . , ' : . . : , ` . . O : . : :'~...•...:.:::'::..•::::::•v: : :.:::::::'::..'0 ~ ~ ~i ~ . . . ::::0 IC ~ . . . ~ ............lM:Df[.::.':':::::.:: ~i~1 F~wc . ' I i ' .w ~w, eu.e N A rt76 PW. Q ~.MAIL ATHLETIC CLUB Third Floor Plan . ~ Nw1~Yr Mb/ i 444 . 9=3 K=de QMJ. VLl (dYidO . ' ~ k5tlud 8frthv. Arfhnrrt • • ~ 0 ~ ~I ea O O M nra nw. _ Ao r~ ~ 4; . , I I t ~ ' `Y ' M. ivw '~9 . t"'~ ~ ° 3 r, Q Q ~ 0 0 1eM~K . ' . ~ , ' . MM. : \ . . :•1 ~ . . K ? ~ y~ . . ~ =r.'h - . -{~,a ""1cti?~?':. •.-~-R - ~f , ~ . . . _ . ' . . . , . . . - " . , . , ~ _ . ~ , IrnIL.. . • : .~eV ' IN' Nr~. . "%e . .~.r.. ' . , _ ..r~:. . . . . . . . . : ;....~:.o.r.5 . . _ : . . . , _ . . . J+~ J 5. . ~ r E. . . . , , : _.r... . . ."y'.' s ki ~ sF:. . ~.,~,y ' . yS~ ...~,,%°K:~ _:z°"' ---."al -_"+-:.::s'~" - # i y~ OM1•. - - ~ ~ + { ~ ~..•F- N, ~ _ r -:~-7-VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB Fourth Floor Plan ~ woeo. on... val tda,do WMWi f/~iv ^ K44 1• ~ ~ . ' IfOOd BY +Y AIdMKt.. . ' ,.V:~~? N Sok: 1/C. 1'.0• . ~ S ORD9NAGVCE NO. 2 Series of 1996 AN ORDBNANCE AMENDANG A SPEC9AL DEVELOPMENT DISTFiBCY - SDD No. 30, THE VABL ,4TFiLET6C CLUB AND AnAENDING TFIE DEVELOPMEIVT PLAN IN ACCORDAIVCE VUITH CHa4PTER 98.40 OF THE Ve4BL MIBtVICiPAL CODE A1VD SETTIR9G FORTH DETAILS IN RECARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development Districts within the Town; and WHEREAS, the developer and applicant, JWT 1987 Vail Limited Partnership (aka The Vail Athletic Club), has submitted'an application for aMajor Special Development District Amendment for a certain parcel of property within the Town, known as the Vail Athletic Club and as Special Development District No. 30 ("SDD No. 30"); and WHEREAS, the Major Special Development District Amendmen4 for SDD No. 30 will ensure unified and coordinated development within the Town of Vail in a manner suitable for the area in which it is situated; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has unanimously recommended approval of the amendrnenq to the SDD; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to arnmend SDD No. 30. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled Planning Commission Report The review procedures prescribed in Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the report of the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending approval of the proposed amendment 4o the development plan for SDD No. 30. Section 2 Special Development District No 30 SDD No. 30 and the arnended development plan therefore, are hereby approved for the redevelopment of The Vail Athletic Club. Section 3. Purpose SDD No. 30 is established to insure comprehensive development and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town of Vail. The development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council and meets the design standards as set forth in Section 18.40 of the Municipal Code. As stated in the staff memorandum dated September 27, Ordinance No. 2 1 Series of 1996 t i 1993, there are significant aspects of SDD No. 30 which are difficult to satisfy through the imposition of the standards of the Public Accommodation Zone District. SDD No. 30 allows for greater flexibility in the development of the land than would be possible under the current zoning of the property. SDD No. 30 provides an appropriate development plan that maintains the unique character of this site and the surrounding area. Section 4. Development Plan A. The amended development plan for SDD No. 30 is approved and shall constitute the plan for development within the Special Development District. The amended development plan is comprised of those plans submitted by the developer/applicant and consists of the following documents: 1. Site Plan and Landscape Plan by Michael Barclay, Project Architect, dated November 11, 1995. 2. Survey completed by Inter-Mountain Engineering dated June 8, 1993. 3. Building Elevations by Michael Barclay, Project Architect, dated December 15, 1995, (Sheets A-10 and A-11). 4. Floor plans by Michael Barclay, Project Architect, dated November 11, 1995, (Lower Health Club, Upper Health Club, First Floor Plan, Second Floor Plan, Third Floor Plan and Fourth Floor Plan). 5. Building Sections by Michael Barclay, Project Architect, dated November 11, 1995. 6. Shadow Studies for September 21 st and December 21 st by Michael Barclay, Project Architect; dated November 11, 1995. . 7. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the Special Development District. B. The development plan shall adhere to the following: 1. Lot Size: 30,486 square feet. . 2. Permitted Uses: a. Accommodation Units. b. Dwelling Units. c. Employee Housing Units. d. Health Club. e. RestauranURetail. 3. Accessory Uses: , All other uses accessory or incidental to the allowed uses. Ordinance No. 2 2 Series of 1996 ~ 0 4. Setbacks: The setbacks shall be those shown on the site plan. 5. Densitv: " Approval of this development plan shall permit 4ifty-five (55) Accommodation Units (AU), fiour (4) Dwelling Units (DU) (tvvo with lock-offs) and four (4) Type IV Employee Housing Units. The developer shall permanently restrict the approved 55 AU's as short-term rental units and the 55 AU's shall not be subdivided in the future to allow for individuai ownership. The Condominium Declarations shall be amended to include this restriction before an occupancy permit will be released for the project. 6. Building Height: Building height shall be as indicated on the elevations. 7. P ra kina: A minimum of hnrenty-four (24) dalet parking spaces shaVl be provided within the existing parking structure. The developer agrees qhat the area adjacent to the parking strucYure's entry, and the area acijacent to the main entry to 4he ho4el (on East Meac9ow Drive), shall be clesignated and used for short-term drop-off and foading/delivery use only. 8. GRFA / Common Area: The total GRFA allowed shall be 34,505 square feet: with 24,898 square feet for Accommodation Units; 8,312 square feet for Dwelling Units; and 1,295 square feet for Employee Housing Units. Additionally, the total common area allowed shall be 15,054 square feet. 9. Site Coveraae: The site coverage shall be as indicated on the Site Plan and Floor Plans. 10. Emplovee Housing: ~ I The developer shall provide four (4) Type IV Employee Housing Units on-site, which ~ shall be restricted per Chapter 18.57 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code prior to the release of any Building Permits for the project. Additionally, the developer shall provide one one-bedroom employee housing unit and one two-bedroom employee housing unit. These employee housing units shall be located off-site, shall be toca4ed within 4he Town of Vail rnunicipal boundary and shall be restricted per Chapter 18.57 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. The employee housing restriction Ordir.ar.ce No. 2 3 Series of 1996 , r agreemznt shall be signed and submitted to the staff for approval before a Building Permit will be released for the project. The units shall meet the minimum standards according to Chapter 18.57 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. 11. Landscaping: The area of the site to be landscaped shall be as indicated on the landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for their approval. The developer shall provide a landscape plan to the DRB and contribute a minimum of $20,000.00 to the design and redevelopment of the landscape on the south side of the building between the building and the streamwalk. This work includes improving and allowing public access through the property via the existing bridge and path on the southwest corner of the building and removing the existing - sod and reseeding the area with a natural grass seed mix and possibly adding additional planting. This area is just south of the willows, adjacent to the Vail Athletic Club, and extends south to the streamwalk. The developer shall maintain this area in perpetuity. 12. Streetscape: The developer shall install a heated concrete unit paver walkway and lighting according to the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, parallel to both the northern and eastern property boundaries of the Vail Athletic Club property, continuing south on the west side of Vail Valley Drive. The walkway will extend across the Gore Creek Bridge as indicated on the Site/Landscape Plan, however, the walkway on the bridge will not be heated nor will the bridge be widened by the developer. At this time, it is anticipated that significant reconstruction of Vail Valley Drive will occur with the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base. All streetscape improvements shall be coordinated with the Town Engineer. In addition, the developer shall provide a plan to the Design Review Board for their approval and shall complete such improvements with the project to improve the signage, landscaping and general pedestrian character of East Meadow Drive as it intersects with the Vail Valley Drive, particularly the north side of East Meadow Drive. The objective of this effort is to not only improve the pedestrian character of this area, but to also deter unnecessary vehicular traffic from entering East Meadow Drive. The developer shall contribute a minimum of $100,000.00 for the design and Ordinance No. 2 4 Series of 1996 ~ b instaliation of the streetscape improvements. Should the cost of these improvements be in excess of $100,000.00, the developer shall be responsible for these costs in their entirety. Stamped engineered drawings shall be submitted for these improvements to the Town of Vail Engineer for approval, prior to the release of any Building Permit(s) for the project. The developer shall maintain the sidewalk, lighting and other streetscape improvements in perpetuity. 13. Desian Requirements: At the time of the DRB submittal, the developer shall submit drawings with architectural details of the building. Section 5. Amendments Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments which do change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by the Town Council after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development Department shall determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan. Section 6. Expiration , The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3) years from the time of qhis Major SDD Amendmen4, and continue diligently toward completion of the project. The developer must meet the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Section 7. Indemnification The developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Town of Vail, including attorney's fees, in any cause of action or suit which joins the Town of Vail concerning the issue of taking any part of any individual's view as a result of this project. Section 8 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 9 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided Ordinance No. 2 5 series or 1996 ti . + in this ordinance shail not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1996, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of , 1996, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Bob Armour, Mayor Attest: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ, AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this day of , 1996. Bob Armour, Mayor Attest: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 2 6 Series of 1996 e ' ~ MINUTES VATL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING December 5, 1995 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held,on Tuesday, December 5, 1995, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Bui-lding. the meetirig was called to order at 7:35 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Armour, Mayor Sybill Navas, Mayor Pra-Tem Peggy Osterfoss Paul Johnston Kevin Foley Michael Jewett Rob Ford First item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Rick Sackbauer of the Vail Valley Consolidated Water District congratulated new council members on their recent appointments and presented a brief update on district projects which included: efforts to consolidate the water district and sanitation district through an election process in May, 1996; progress on employee housing; Eag1e Park Reservoir. project and completion of the . interconnect. Mr. Sackbaur informed Council members he would come in after first of the year with a more detailed update and thanked Council for their participation. The.second item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda which consisted of approval of the Minutes for the meetings of November 7 and 21, 1995. Mayor Armour read the Consent Agenda in full. Sybill moved to approve the Consent Agenda with a second by Kevin. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0. Third on the agenda was Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 18.39 (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) of the Vail Municipal Code and approving the Development Plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, 485 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing, and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant Vail Associates, Inc., was represented by David Corbin. Mayor Armour read the title in full. Town of Vail planners Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton reviewed i the application, plans for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base, and work sessions that had been held with the PEC and the Town Council regarding the application. (For a complete. analysis of the proposal, please refer to the November 27, 1995 staff inemorandum to the PEC, distributed to the Council on November 28, 1995.) It was further explained that staff recommended approval of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1995, and conditional approval of the Development Plan. Jim Curnutte stated the purpose of the ordinance was to propose text changes. Sybi11 moved to approve Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1995 on first reading, and the motion was seconded by Rob Ford. A vote was taken and approved unanimously, 7-0. Discussion then centered around the proposed development plan and 1 v~c e~ e~y rr~.c,~ m~,toh , zio5/~as , t included: the proposed new base lodge and the building of a 148- space parking structure. Council members reviewed a list of conditions attached to the development plan from Community Development. Dave Corbin, representing the applicant, explained that the parking structure would possibly be phased iri over a two year period. He stated parking issues were complicated and suggested an amended plan be brought to the December 19 council evening meeting for possible approval. Disc.ussion continued regarding the proposed parking structure and what would happen should Vail Associates not build it. Additional topics of discussion included street scape improvements, cost sharing and maintenance of proposed street scape improvements. Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association, asked for clarification of who would be responsible for maintenance of proposed new sidewalks. Diane Milligan, representing the Ramshorn Condominium Association, commented on snow removal for the area. Tom Moorhead informed Council that Public Works does not maintain sidewalks and that by ordinance it is the responsibility of the individual property owners. Vail resident, Nancy Rondeau asked questions and expressed her concerns. Council members agreed the development plan would be subject to Council's approval at the time of the second reading on Ordinance 25, Series of 1995. . The fourth item on the agenda was Resolution No.27, Series of 1995, a Resolution setting the date for a Special Election for the purpose of electing a Council member to complete the unexpired term of Margaret A. O.sterfoss, term to expire November, 1997. Paul Johnston moved to approve the resolution, with a second by Sybill Navas. A vote was taken and approved • unanimously, 7-0. Item number five on the agenda was the appointment of Local Licensing Authority Member. Dave Chapin, Gene Uselton, and Terry Walker were applicants for one position created by the resignation of former chairman, Davey Wilson. Ballots were distributed and Holly McCutcheon tallied the ballots. Sybill moved to appoint David Chapin to fill the vacancy on the Local Licensing Authority, with a second from Mike Jewitt. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0. Sixth on the agenda,was an appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision to deny the requested front _ setback variance proposed for the residence currently under construction on Lot 6, Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision/2832 C Kinnikinnick Road. The appellant, Bob Borne, represented by Sally Brainerd of RKD Design Inc., was appealing the Planning and Environmental Commission's denial of the front setback variance request, pursuant to Section 18.62.070, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. - Town of Vail planner George Ruther reviewed the background of the appeal and the November 27, 1995 PEC meeting and the Commission members vote of 3-2 (Armour and Moffet Dissenting) to deny the proposed front setback variance request. George explained the members voting in favor of the motion to deny, felt that the granting of the variance would result in a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the Zoning Code. Applicant, Bob Borne explained the had requested the setback due to a surveying error 2 ryn-;,n , z/os/b a ' and the error had caused a 3.5 foot encroachment into the front setback. Mr. Borne respectfully requested the council's consideration to overturn the PEC decision. Vail resident, Michael Arnet spoke in favor of Mr. Borne and cited human error. A motion was made by Peggy Osterfoss to overturn the PEC's decision based on the fact that the request did meet variance criteria and did not create a special privilege. Sybill Navas seconded the motion, a vote was taken.and passed unanimously, 7- 0. PO amended her motion to include the staff recommendation and .was approved by all council members. Item No. 7. on the agenda was an appeal of a DRB decision to approve the International Wing at the Lodge at Vail, located at 174 E. Gore Creek Drive. Town of Vail Planner, Andy Knutdsen reviewed the history surrounding the project and explained that - on 11/1/95 the DRB voted 5-0 to approve the International Wing, and that three work sessions with the DRB preceded that decision. An exterior alteration approval by the PEC was made on 10/10/83, and the PEC approval was based on the criteria for exterior alterations as well as an agreement which the Town had executed with the Lodge relating to accommodation units and conference area within the Village. Attorney, Jay Peterson represented the applicant, Lodge Properties, Inc., explained he was there to request the 1983 DRB decision be upheld. Mayor Armour requested Mr. Peterson and other.lawyers present speak after the presentation by the applicant. Applicant, Lodge Properties, Inc., represented by Greg Christian, distributed the design of the proposed International Wing, and presented the proposed change of 1983, adding 19 rooms. Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead explained that 1983 decisions were still in effect. He further stated that any changes or modification to the original approved application would have to be reviewed by the DRB. Ann Frick, on behalf of Lou Ann Wells, adjacent property owner, that statutory procedures were not adhered to, and that the 1983 agreement was illegal. Architect, Lynn Fritzlen, stated inappropriate procedure was followed and that relying on a 83 planning approval was inappropriate after 12 years. Peggy Osterfoss asked what the ti,me line was for approval. Tom Moorhead informed her that in 1983 there was no time line set forth on exterior alterations, but since that date there has been,a two year time limit put into effect. Those opposed to the approval of the International Wing who gave input included: Attorney, Art Abplanalp, representing owners of Unit #527, Mr. & Mrs. Saltz, as well as three other units. Mr. Abplanalp presented a map which he said depicted the . proposed sight barriers of certain private condomin.ium owners and stated that Rick Rosen represented the Cabinas, also adjacent property owners. Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association, requested council members take into consideration a new opportunity, and requested this project be withdrawn. Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, Lodge properties, Inc. addressed concerns and answered questions. Mike Arnett, Design Review Board Chairman, was on hand to answer questions, as was Jack Zehren, architect for the project. Peggy moved to uphold the DRB approval of the project with the stipulation that additional staff-approved modifications be made to the plan to improve sight and sound barriers on the building's west side. Kevin Foley seconded the.motion. A vote was taken and passed, 6-1, Mike Jewitt voting in opposition. 3 'UmG `J_ C-l C-j Yll.4,1 71"n t 2 f Q5/95 ~i. ` Item No. 8. On the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob asked council members to c:heCk their calendars in order to meet for a special work sessior.l on Tuesday, February 13, and reminded them of the Town of Vail`s Christmas party at the Marriott on Friday night. Mayor Armour informed thos;e present of his concern regarding raising the speed limit to 75 mph and asked that staff research the issue and any possible! alternatives. Bob McLaurin said he would discuss it with the new.Police Chief. Other topics of discussion. included: the shortage of bus drivers and overcrowding; the need for a voice mail system for council members. There being no further business, a motion was made by Pau1 Johnston to adjourn, with a second from Kevin Foley at approximately 11:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Armour, Mayor , ATTTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Cler}c (Names of certain individuals who gave :public input may be inaccurate) LE v~G CwunaE E',w~ 'In~„~ 711,,~~ 12/(15/4s t e - 1 NiIiVUTES VAIL TOWIV COUfVCIL MEETIIVG December 19, 1995 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, December 19, 1995, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESEIVT: Robert W. Armour, Mayor Sybill IVavas, Mayor Pra-Tem Paul Johnston , Kevin Foley Michael Jewett Rob Ford MEMBERS ABSEiVT: Peggy Osterfoss TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager R. Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney Anne Wright on behalf of the Town Clerk The $orst atem on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Joel Heath of the Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau encouraged the Town Council to help find alternative sites for volleyball courts, in light of the fact that the existing courts at Golden Peak are proposed to be removed with the redevelopment. Second on the agenda was second reading of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1995, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 18:39 (Ski Base/Recreation Zone District) of the Vail Municipal Code and approving the Development Plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base, 485 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing, and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing. Jim Curnutte explained that the ordinance was the same as the Council reviewed at their last meeting with the exception of one change on page 5, paragraph D. Staff recommended passage of this ordinance with this change. Dave Corbin on behalf of the applicant statedhe had reviewed the change and had no objection to that revision. Jim Lamont representing the East Village Homeowners Association stated that the change met their needs. Sybill IVavas made a motion to pass Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1995 on second reading with a second by Mike Jewett. A vote was taken and passed unanimously 6-0. At this time Fred Wyman, a resident of All Seasons Condominiums approached the podium and expressed his concern with the parking. Bob Armour informed him that that matter would be addressed a little later in the meeting. Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton initiated discussions regarding the Developer's Agreement, including agreements on cost sharing, the transfer of easements, the estabfishment of a neighborhood assessment committee, etc. ~ Bob McLaurin talked about the realignment of Vail Valley Drive before any decision is to be made on the iVlanor Vail pedestrian crosswalk. Paul Jahnston stated he thought the sidewalk along the west side of Vail Valley Drive should be heated. Several neighboring residents and condominiums expressed their concerns about the following: * lighting of Vail Valley Drive and the pedestrian walkways * heating and definition (color) of sidewalks in the areas * maintenance of the area 1 Vail Tuwn Council Evcning Mecting Minutcs 17J19/95 r A j A clean copy of thcwrecommended Conditions of Approval was provided and the items were diseussed. Bob Armour said that VA would like to amend the parking structure portion of the Golden Peak operational management plan. VA has requested that 25 spaces be added to tier one. Various neighboring residents and condominiums voiced their concern about additional traffic and congestion on Vail Valley Drive and that perhaps some type of electronic signing could be utilized. Dave Corbin thought the children's center sidewalk and parking lot design in condition No. 3 was taken care of, however after some discussion he agreed that it should stay as written. Sybill Navas moved to approve the Golden Peak Redevelopment Plan with the conditions recommended by staff, as modified at the meeting, with a second by Rob Ford. A vote was taken and passed unanimously 6-0. - Third on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1995, an ordinance amending Section 18.24.050 (B) of.the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for eliminating any existing dwelling unit or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor in Commercial C,ore I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. George Ruther presented this ordinance. Staff believes that an amendment should be made to Section 18.24.050 (B) to include text requiring a Conditional Use Permit for any use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor, similar to that which is required for uses on the second floor. Staff believes this amendment should be made to create consistency within the Zoning Code and to help carry out the intention of the Permitted arid Conditional Use Sectians of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. A copy of the Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum dated November 27, 1995 has been provided for reference, On November 27, 1995, the Town of Vail Community Development Department presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission, the above described amendment. After a lengthy discussion, a motion to recommend approval of the proposed amendment to Town Council was . made. The Planning and Environmental Commission voted 4-2 in favor of the recommendation. . Planning Comrriission members Greg Amsden and Dalton Williams voted in opposition. Staff feels the proposed amendment to Section 18.24.050 (B), will create consistency within the Zoning Code and will help carry out the intention of the Permitted and Conditional Use. Sections of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts. Staff believes it is the intention of the Zoning Code to permit dwelling or acc;ommodation units to be eliminated above the second floor in the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts to allow for another Permitted or Conditional Use, subject to the issuance' of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code. The proposed amendment will ensure that a request to combine or enlarge existing accommodation or dwelling units into one or more units will be reviewed by the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. Sybill Navas made a motion to pass Ordiriance No. 25, Series of 1995 on first reading with a second by Kevin Foley. A vote was taken and passed unanimously 6-0. Forth on the agenda was the Appointment of Special Election Judges. The list of judges is . Karen Morter, Mary Caster, Holiday CoIP, Jeannie Tilkmeier and Pam Story as alternate. Paul Johnston made a motion to approvE the list of Election Judges, with a second by Sybill Navas. A vote was taken and passed unanimously 6-0. Fifth on the agenda was a Town Council call-up of a PEC approvEd Conditional Use Permit to allow for a"quasi-public club" in the Commercial Core I Zone District, to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors of the Serrano's Building, located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Glen Heelan, representing Margaretta B. Parks. At the December 5, 1995 Town Council rneeting the Town Council members approved a motion to call-up the PEC approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a"quasi-public club" to be located on the 3rd and 4th floors of the Serrano's Building. The Conditional Use Permit request was approved by the PEC on November 27, 1995, by a vote of 5-1. Tom Moorhead and Jim Curnutte presented this call-up. Glen Heelan was present on behalf of the applicant, Margaretta B. Parks. 2 Vail Tuwn Cauncil Evcning Mccting Minutes I JIIllS b a' • Paul Johnston askGd Mr. Heelan how many members he anticipated to be in this club. Mr. Heelan said approximately 400. Paul Johnson asked how Mr. Heelan anticipated these members would access the club. Mr. Heelan replied by walking from the parking structure. Paul expressed his concerns that the club members would be dropped off on Hanson Ranch Road, creating more traffic and congestion in that area. Michael Jewett asked why the change in plans for the use of this building from residential and office space on the top two floors to the current plans. Mr. Heelan said it was looked into and this was a needed service for Vail guests and that use seemed to make better sense. Jim Lamont voiced his concern regarding policy issues. He stated that staff was biased against dwelling units as opposed to accommodation units and commercial uses. Bob Armour asked about the horizontal zoning and Tom Moorhead and Jim Curnutte explained the same. Paul Johnston made a motion to overturn the PEC approval of a Conditional Use Permit with a second by Sybill Navas. A vote was taken and the motion failed 2-4, with Kevin Foley, Michael Jewett, Rob Ford and Bob Armour opposed. Kevin Foley then made a motion to uphold the PEC approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the two staff conditions. Michael Jewett seconded the motion. Jim Curnutte informed Council there were two additional PEC conditions which were that the applicant have only a public liquor license and that the Conditional Use Permit run concurrently with the other approvals that were granted in April. Kevin Foley amended his motion to also include these two additional conditions and Michael Jewett seconded the amendment. A vote was taken and passed 4-2, with Paul Johnston and Sybill Navas opposed. Paul Johnston wanted it noted for the record that Hanson Ranch Road is one way going east. Saxth on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob McLaurin asked Council if they were willing to have an all day retreat on Tuesday, February 27. Council agreed. Bob also asked members of Council to let Anne Wright know if they were interested in attending either the CAST meeting or the CML - Elected Officials' Workshop. . There being no further business the meeting was adjourn at approximately 10:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Anne Wright on behalf of the Town Clerk. ('Names of certain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurale.) 3 Vail Tuwn Cauncil Evcning Mceting Minutcx 17J19/95 RESOLUT90tV NO. I SEFiIES OF 1996 A RESO~UT90N DES9(aNA'B'9NG A PU6LIC PL.ACE W9'TFIIIV THE TOWIV OF VA1L FOR THE POSTING OF NOTICE FOR PUBLIC nAEET'IfVGS OF . U HE tlP1ILL. TOYY/tl i./OVlVClLy PLAYVNING AND ENV9R0NMENTAL COMfVIISSIORI, DESIGIV REi/IE11V BOARD, P1ND .'1J 0 HER BOF'ilfLDSy '1/OIYEItl6Ia7S'OYtlJ, P91YD /`9iY 1 9-!OR' 0IES OF THG TOYtlltl OF tlP1IIL. WHEREAS, Section 24-6-402(c), C.R.S., as amended provides that local public bodies must give full and timely notice to the public of any meetings at which the adoption of any proposed policy, position, resolution, rule, regulation, or formal action occurs at which a majority or quorum of the body is in attendance, or is expected to be in attendance; and WHEREAS, in addition to any other means of full and timely notice, the statute provides that a local public body shall be deemed to have given full and timely notice if notice of the meeting is posted in a designated public place within the boundaries of the local public body no less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the holding of the meeting; and WHEREAS, the statute further provides that the public place or places for posting of such notice shall be designated annually at the iocal body's first regular meeting of each calendar year; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail now wishes to designate a public place within its boundaries for the posting of such full and timely notice to the public for meetings of the Town Council, the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Design Review Board, and other boards, committees, and authorities of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: 1. The Town Council hereby designates the bulletin boards at the east and west entrances of the Town of Vail Municipal Offices as the public places for the posting of full and timely notice to the public as provided for in 24-6-402(1)(c), C.R.S., as amended. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of January, 1996. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\RESOLU96.1 Resolution No. 1, Series of 1996 'v ' ORDINANCE NO. 25 _ SERIES OF 1995 AN ORDINANCE AAAEPdD19VG SEC710P1 18.24.050 (B) OF TF9E AAUPIICIPAL CODE OF THE . Y01A/W OF NAIL, SETYING FORTH NlEW PROCEDURES FOR ELINNNATING ANY EXISTIPdG DWELLING UNIT OR ACCOMMODATION UNIT OR APJY PORTION THEREOF ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR lN CONiMERC1AL CORE I AND COMMERCIAL CORE II ZOPdE DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the Town Council believes the following amendment will create more consistency within the zoning code and help to carry ouf the intentions of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Code II Zone Districts; WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmenta{ Commission recommends the amendment; ' WHEREAS, the 7own Counci{ believes it has been the intention to require Planning and Environmental Cammission review of a proposaf to eliminate an existing dwelling unit or accommodation unit or any portion thereof to another Permitted or Conditional Use, subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Town Council believes the proposed amendment will insure That a request to combine or en4arge existing dweiling or accommodation units into one or more units will be reviewed by the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNC{L OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO that: 1. Section 18.24.050 Permitted and conditional uses - Above second floor. - A. The following uses shail be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade: 1. Multiple-family residential dwellings; 2. Lodges. B. The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60. Any permitted or conditional use which etiminates any existing dwefling or accommodation . unit, or any portion theieof, shalf require a Conditional Use Permit. Such • , uses may include: 1. Retail stores and establishments, including the following: Apparel stores, • Art supply stores and galleries, Bakeries and confectioneries, restricted to preparation of products specifically for sale on the premises, , Bookstores, Camera stores and photographic studios, Chinaware and glassware stores, Delicatessens and specialty food stores, Drugstores, ' Florists, Gift shops, Hobby stores, 1 Ortlinence No. 25. Series of 1995 Jewelry stores, Leather goods stores, Luggage stores, Music and record stores, Newsstands and tobacco stores, ' Photographic studios, Stationery stores, Toy stores, , Variery stores, Yardage and dry goods stores, • Liquor stores, - ' Radio and N stores and repair shops, Sporting good stores; 2. Eating and drinking establishments, including the following: Bakeries and delicatessens with food seneice, sestricted to preparation of products specifically for sale on the premises, ' Gocktail lounges and bars, Coffee shops, Fountain and sandwich shops, • Restaurants; 3. Professional offices, business offices, and studios; 4. Banks and financial institutions; 5. Personal services and repair shops, including the following: Barbershops, Beauty shops, Business and office services, Small appliance repair shops, Tailors and dressmakers, Travel and ticket agencies; 6. Theaters; , 7. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of this section in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.040, so long as they do not encourage vehicular traffic; 8. Reserved; =199. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060; 1410. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason hefd to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validiry of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 2 . Ortlinance Na 25, Series ot 1995 0 ° 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safery, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants > thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extend.only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any byfaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INT'RODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READIfVG this 19th day of December, 1995, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 2nd day of January, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Ghambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED in full this day of , 1996. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATT'EST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk ' C10R095.25 3 Ortlinance No. 25, Series of 1995 ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 27, 1995 SUBJECT: A request for an amendmPnt to Chapter 18.24.050 (B), Permitted and Conditional Uses Above Second Floor, to clarify the zoning code regarding the removal of dwelling units and accommodation units for all floors above the second floor, requiring a Conditional Use Permit. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther I. INTRODUCTION Section 18.24.050, (Permitted and Conditional Uses - Above Second Floor) of the zoning code permits numerous uses above the second floor in Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II. Examples of conditional uses in Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II are retail stores, restaurants, professional offices, etc.. Multi-family residential dwellings and lodges are permitted uses on any floor above the second floor above grade. Section 18.24.040, (Permitted and Condil:ional Uses - Second Floor) of the zoning code, identifies uses which shall be permitted on the second floor of a structure above grade. Section 18.24.040 also indicates that a Conditicanal Use Permit will be required for any use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unit ar any portion thereof. Currently, this requirement is not applicable to uses above the second floor (Section 1$.24,050). Staff believes that an amendment should be made to Section 18.24.050 (B), to include text requiring a Conditional Use Permit for any use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unit or any portion thereof above the second floor, similar to that which is required for uses on the second floor. Staff feels this amendment should be made to create consistency within the zoning code and tG help carry out the intention of the permitted and conditional use sections of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II zone districts. , It is the staff's opinion that it has been the intention to allow dwelling or accommodation units to be eliminated (above the second floor) and replaced by other permitted or conditional uses subject to the issuance of a'Conditional l9se Permit. While it is true that the elimination of a dwelling unit or accommodation would be looked at through the Conditional Use Permit process, the elimination of a dwelling unit or accommodation unit is currently no,t required to be reviewed should the use remain residential. This srtuation has occurred when a property owner proposes to combine one or more dwelling units or accommodation units into one or more new enlarged units. In this situation, the use has remaiiied residential, however, there has been a reduction in the number of overall units. Staff's proposed amendment to Section 18.24.050 (B) will ensure that such requests are reviewed in accorclance with the Conditional Use Permit chapter of the zoning code.. a ~ I PROPOSED AMENDM1€NT The proposed addition to Section 18.24.050 (6) is shown below. The addition appears as shi~detl text: 18.24.050 Permotted and conda$Bonal uses -Above secowd itoor. A. The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade: 1. Multiple-family residential dwellings 2. Lodges , B. The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Ch r 1 : apte 8.60 ~y vo~r~~c~ or ~n#rtt~p~~E ~s~ ~h:~l~m[nat~~.:any ex~s~€r~g duveIling Mr ac0o€~~nd~~Qi~~iTii~;: o~ ~Py.p~rti~±~ #.ereof, s~all ~~~~~re a~onti~ti4r~ac k~se P~rrnit: 1. Retail stores and establishments, including the following: . Apparel stores, Art supply stores and galleries, ' Bakeries and confectioneries, restricted to preparation of products specifically for sale on the premises, Bookstores, Camera stores and photographic studios, Chinaware and glassware stores, Delicatessens and speciality food stores, Drugstores, ' Florists, Gift shops, Hobby stores, . Household appliance stores, Jevuelry stores, Leather goods stores, Luggage stores, , Music and record stores, iVewsstands and tobacco stores, Photographic studios, Stationery stores, Toy stores, Variety stores, Yardage and dry goods stores, Liquor stores, Radio and TV stores and repair shops, Sporting goods stores; 2. Eating and drinking establishments, including the following: Bakeries and delicatessens with food service, restricted to preparation of products specifically for sale on the premises. Cocktail lounges and bars, Coffee shops, Fountain and sandwrich shops, 2 ~ ~ Restaurants; 3. Professional offices, business offices, and studios; 4. Banks and financial institutions; 5. Personal services and repair shops, including the following: Barbershops, Beauty shops, Business and office services, Small appliance repair shops, Tailors and dressmakers, Travel and ticket agencies; 6. Theaters; 7. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of this section in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.040, so long as they do not encourage vehicular traffic; 8. Reserved; . 9. Dog kennel; 10. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060; 11. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. (Ord. 8(1992) § 21: Ord. 20(1982) § 5: Ord. 8(1981) § 2: Ord. 26(1980) § 2(part): Ord. 16(1975) § 3(A)(D): Ord. 8(1973) § 8.200(D).) III. CONFORMITY WRH THE TOWN'S RELEVANT PLANPIING DOCUMENTS In considering the proposed text amendment change to Section 18.24.050(B), staff relied on several relevant planning documents before making a decision. Specifically, staff reviewed the purpose section of the Commercial Core I(CCI) and Commercial Core II (CCII) zone districts and the goals and objectives stated in the Vail Village Mlaster Plan. According to Sections 18.24.010(Purpose, Commercial Core I) and 18.26.010 (Purpose, Commercial Core II), in part, the purpose of the CCI and CCII zone districts is to provide sites for . a mixture of multiple dwellings, lodges and commercial establishments and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village and Vail Lionshead pedestrian environment. Upon review of the Vail Village Master Plan, staff has identified the following goals, objectives and policies as being relevant to the proposed text amendments: GOAL #1 Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Vail Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. 1.2 OBJECTIVE Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. GOAL #2 To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year round economic health and viability for the Village.and for the community as a whole. 2.3 OB.DECTIVE Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations. 3 ~ P 2.3.1 POLVClf The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed abo.ve existing density levels are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term overnight rental. 2.5 OBJECTIV!E Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging in commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. IV. STe~~F RECOIIAMENDAT90N Staff feels the proposed amendment to Section 18.24.050 (B), as described in the memorandum, will create consistency vuithin the zoning code and vuill help carry out the intention of the permitted and conditional use sections of the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II zone districts. Staff believes it is the intention of the zoning code to allow dwelling or accommodation units to be eliminated above the second itoor to allow for another permitted or conditional use, subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Chapter 18.60. The proposed amendment will ensure that a request to combine or enlarge existing accommodation or dwelling units into one or more larger units will be reviewed by the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. , f:\everyone\pecMemos\zoning.n27 4 ~ R - PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION November.27, 1995 Partial Minutes 2. A request for an amendment to Chapter 18.24.050, Permitted and Conditional Uses Above Second Floor, to clarify the Zoning Code regarding the removal of dwelling units and accommodation units for all floors above the second floor, requiring a Conditional Use Permit. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther George Ruther gave an overview of the request and stated that he was bringing it to the PEC as a housekeeping item. If we are proposing to keep the use the same, there would be no change in the permitted use. This change in the permitted use is in the staff memo with the language. Staff feels this change should be made to create consistency in the code. Bob Armour asked Tom Moorhead if he was going to say anything on this subject. Jim Lamont, representing the EVHA, would like to see the language strengthened and is in favor of the change, because it promotes the mixed use in the neighborhood. Greg Moffet asked if we were recommending this to go to Council. George Ruther said yes, that any change to an Ordinance goes to the Council. Greg Amsden is against it because it is an addition to a process that is not needed. Jeff Bowen said it tightens up the Ordinance. He proposed that in addition to the staff's language some of the uses in the memo should be deleted such as delicatessens and speciality food stores, Variety stores, Liquor stores, Radio and TV stores and repair shops and kennels. Dalton Williams said it reduces density in the wrong place and so he is in favor of it.. Dalton said to delete dog kennels, but wants to stick with the text that staff recommended. Henry Pratt falls between the two Gregs. He can go either way. Bob Armour is in favor of it. Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve this request for recommendation to Council with the additional language that dog kennel and Household Appliance stores be removed. Greg Moffet seconded the motion. Dalton Williams said he hates to tinker with the wording on the spur of the moment, although he is not in favor of dog kennels being included. Jeff Bowen reminded the Commissioners that this is going to Council. The vote was 4 in favor and Greg Amsden and Dalton Williams opposed. ORDINAIVCE NO. 9 SER6ES OF 1936 F6RST A4iflENDiViENT TO TIiE TOWN OF VA?4L POLOCE AND FIRE EMPLOYEES' PEIVS90N PL.A,N WHEREAS, the Town of Vail adopted, effective January 1, 1983, a qualified maney purcFiase pension plan known as the Town of Vail Police and Fire Employees' Pension Plan (the "Plan"), for the purpose of providing retirement benefits for its police and fire employees; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has amended from time to time the Plan, and restated the Plan to incorporate all propr amendments and other changes required by law effective January 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail desires to further amend the Plan to ciarify certain administrative issues that arose in the request for determination from the Internal Revenue Service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: , 1) In consideration of the premises, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: Section 4.1, Contributions by the Employer for Full-Time Regular Employees, the last two (2) sentences shall be deleted. 4.1 Contributions by the Employer for Full-Time Reqular Employees. The Employer shall contribute and pay into the Trust Fund for each pay period to the credit of the Employer Contributions Account of each Participant who is a Full-Time Regular Employee an amount equal to 11.15% of such ParticipanYs compensation for such pay period during the first year of employment and 16.15°l0 of such ParticipanYs compensation thereafter. IVotwithstanding the foregoing, the rate of contribution of any such employee shoe date of employment with the Employer was prior to June 1, 1986 will remain at 17.6%. The Employer shall make payment of its contribution for each pay period in one sum as soon as practical after the end of such pay period. Such contribution shall be made in cash. 2) If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for . any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of 1 Ordinance No. 1, Series ot 1996 this ordinance; and the Town Council riereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, s"uUSection, sentencp, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any _ one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3) The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4) The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or pror,eedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5) All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 2nd day of January, 1996, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 16th day of January, 1996, at 7:30 p..m. in the Council Chambers of tfie Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this _ day of , 1996. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD96.1 2 Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1996 ' ORD9NAfVCE N0. 3 SER9ES OF 1996 AN ORDINANCE F0R THE REGULATION OF TRAFFOC BV THE TOVVN OF VA?BL, COLORADO, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SVSTEIVI OF TRAFFIC REGl1LATIONS C0NSISTENT WITH STATE LAV!/ AIVD GENERALLV COIVFORnABNG TO SIMILAR REGULe4TDONS THROUGHOUT THE STr4TE AND THE NATION; d4DOPTfNG BV FiEFERENCE THE 1995 EDITBOM OFTBiE "IIAODEL TRA?FFIC CODE FOR COLOFtADO fViUiVIC9PALBT9ES"; REPEAL9NG ALL ORDIIVANCES IIV COIVFLICT THEREW6'T8-9; AfVD PROV6D9NG PENALTIES FOFi VIOLATION THEREOF. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail has previously adopted by reference the "Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities", 1974 Edition, and 1977 Edition, for the regulation of traffic within the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Department af Highways for the State of Colorado has revised said "PVlodel Traffic Code", and the Town Council of the Town of Vail deems it in the interest of the public safety and welfare to adopt such revised "Model Traffic Code" in its revised form for the regulation of traffic within the Town of Vail; . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWIV OF. VAIL, COLORADO THAT: 1) Adoption by Reference. Pursuant to Article 16 of Title 31, C.R.S., as amended, there is hereby adopted by -reference the "Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities", officiaiiy approved, adopted, and published in 1995 as such by the Colorado Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, and hereinafter referred to as the "Municipal Traffic Code" of which three (3) copies are now filed in the office of the Clerk of the Town of Vail, Colorado, and may be inspected during regular business hours, the same being adopted as if set out at length save and except the amendments set forth herein. " 2) Amendments. A. Section 1101 is hereby amended as follows: (b) 15 miles per hour in any business district, as defined in Section 42-1- 102(11), C.R.S.; (c) 15 miles per hour in any residence district, as defined in. Section 42-- 102(80), C.R.S. B. Section 1503, shall be amended by adding the following subparagraph: (6) All motorcycles and motorized bicycles shall, be prohibited in areas designated by the Town as pedestrian malls or areas. 1 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996 ~ 3) Application of Ordinance. This ordinance and the Municipal Traffic Code shall apply to every street, alley, sidewalk or sidewalk area, driveway, park and to every public or private way and public parking area, whether within or outside the corporate limits of the Town, the use of which the Town has jurisdiction and authority to regulate. 4) Violations and Penalties Thereof. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any of the provisions of the Municipal Traffic Code as adopted and amended hereiri, or of any provision of this ordinance, and any such violation shall be punishable as hereinbefore provided. Every person convicted of a violation of any provision of the Municipal Traffic Code or of any provision of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than three hundred dol{ars ($300.00) or by imprisonment for not more than ninety (90) days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. 5) Filing Copies. After the effective date of the adoption of the Municipal Traffic Code, three copies certified to be true copies by the Mayor and the Town Clerk shall be filed in the Office of the Town Clerk where they shall be kept for public inspection during regular office hours while this ordinance is in force. 6) Repeal. . . This ordinance shall be in fu{I force and effect after its approval by the Town Council and final publication as prescribed by law, and shall supersede all previously adopted Municipal Traffic.Codes as amended. Upon the effective'date of this ordinance, the Town Council specifically repeals Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1976, provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed or deemed to affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance, section or provision of any ordinance repealed or superseded by this ordinance. 7) Severabilitv. It is the intention of the Town Council that this ordinance or any part or provision thereof, shal( be considered severable and, if any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared severable. 8) If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Councif hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and 2 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996 ' : a each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 9) The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 10) The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 11) All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED OIVCE IfV FULL ON FIRST READING this 2nd day of January, 1996, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 16th day of January, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail . Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this _ day of , 1996. S Robert W. Armour, IVlayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\OAD96.3 3 Ordinance No. 3, Series ot 1996 ~ g - ORDINANCE NO. 3 SERIES OF 1996 AN ORDYNANCE FO~ THE RECUL.Q?TfiOIV OF TFiA?FFIC BV 1'0-IE TOVI/IV OF VAIL, COLORADO, FOFE THE PURP'OSE OF PROV9DING A SYS'CEM OF TRAFFIC REGULA?TIOIVS CONS9STE~T W9TH STATE LAVV ARID GEIVERALLY COIVFORMING TO S[MtLAR REtaQ.YLA?TBOn9S TC-9R0UtaF80BJT THE ST',4TE AIVD THE INAI'10N; ADOPTING BY REFERENCE TEiE 1995 EDBTlON OFTHE "MODEL TRAFF9C CODE FOR COLORADO MUNIC9PAL6T9ES"; REPEALING ALL ORDINAfVCES IN COIVFLICT THEREVUITFG; AND PROVID@iVG PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail has previously adopted by reference the "Model Traffic Cade for Coiorado IViunicipalities", 1974 Edition, and 1977 Edition, for the regulation of traffic within the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Department of Highways for the State of Colorado has revised said "IVlodel Traffic Code", and the Town Council of the Town of Vail deems it in the interest of the public safety and welfare to adopt such revised "Model Traffic Code" in its revised form for the regulation of traffic within the Town of Vail; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIiVED BY THE TOWIV COUIVCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: 1) Adoption by Reference. Pursuant to Articie 16 of Titie 31, C.R.S., as amended, there is hereby adopted by reference the "Mode{ Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities", officially approved, adopted, and published in 1995 as such by the Colorado Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, and hereinafter referred to as the "Municipal Traffic Code" of which three (3) copies are now filed in the office of the Clerk of the Town of Vail, Colorado, and may be inspected during regular business hours, the same being adopted as if set out at length save and except the amendments set forth herein. 2) Amendments. A. Section 1101 is hereby amended as follows: (b) 15 miles per hour in any business district, as defined in Section 42-1- 102(11), C.R.S.; (c) 15 miles per hour in any residence district, as defined in Section 42-- 102(80), C.R.S. , B. Section 1503, shall be amended by adding the following subparagraph: (6) All motorcycles and motorized bicycles shall be prohibited in areas designated by the Town as pedestrian malls or areas. 1 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996 ~ r 3) Application of Ordinance. This ordinance and the Municipal Traffic Code shall appiy to every street, alley, sidewalk or sidewalk area, driveway, park and to every public or private way and public parking area, whether within or outside the corporate limits of the Town, the use of which the Town has jurisdiction and authority to regulate. 4) Violations and Penalties Thereof. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any of the provisions of the Municipal Traffic Code as adopted and amended herein, or of any provision of this ordinance, and any such viofation shall be panishabie as hereinbefore provided. Every person convicted of a violation of any provision of the Municipal Traffic Code or of any provision of this ordinance.shall be punished by a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) or by imprisonment for not more than ninety (90) days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. 5) Filing Copies. After the effective date of the adoption of the Municipal Traffic Code, three copies certified to be true copies by the Mayor and the Town Clerk shall be filed in the Office of the Town Clerk where they shall be kept for public inspection during regular office hours while this ordinance is in force. 6) Repeal. . This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its approval by the Town Council and final publication as prescribed by law, and shall supersede all previousVy adopted Municipal Traffic.Codes as amended. Upon the effective date of this ordinance, the Town Council specifically repeals Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1976, provided, however, that nothing herein shaU be construed or deemed to affect or prevent the prosPCUtion or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance, section or provision of any ordinance repealed or superseded by this ordinance. 7) Severabilitv. It is the intention of the Town Council that this ordinance or any part or provision thereof, shall be considered severab{e and, if any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance whicri can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared severable. 8) If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for , any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hEreby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and 2 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996 ~ ~ each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 9) The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 10) The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vaii as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 11) All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED OIVCE IN FULL OIV FIRST READING this 2nd day of January, 1996, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 16th day of January, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Hoily McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ A1VD APPROVED OIV SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this ! day of , 1996. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Hoily McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD96.3 3 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1996 4VAIL TO~r 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Maiiager Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Robert W. McLaurin Town Manager DATE: December 29, 1995 SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report Town Council Retreat We are set for February 27, 1996 for the Town Council Goal Setting/Strategic Planning Retreat. This retreat will be facilitated by Dick Bowers who is the City Manager of the City of Scottsdale, Arizona. Dick has conducted a number of sessions with the Vail Town Council and Town of Vail staff. The tentative location for this retreat will be at the Ford Room at the Village Hall in Beaver Creek. It will begin at approximately 8:00 a.m. and should conclude no (ater than 5:00 p.m. I wili let you know when these arrangements have been finalized. As we have discussed, the purpose of this retreat is to establish the Town Council's critical strategic goals and critical objectives for the coming two years. If possible, I would like for the Council to meet on Monday evening to have dinner and to meet Dick Bowers. This would give you an opportunity to discuss some of the issues with Dick prior to the session and would make the Tuesday session more effective. Public Participation Workshop On February 13, 1996 we have set aside all day for Council workshop on pubiic participation. As we have discussed, we hope to establish a systematic process of public participation. We hope to review the theoretical basis for public sector decision theory, and we will have some Vail examples as well. We believe this workshop will be most helpful in establishing a positive working relationship with the various interest groups and community members in the valley. RECYCLED PAPER Vail Host Program The Vail Host Program which was discussed in the last Town Manager's Report was very successful. Approximately 75 community members volunteered to assist our guests during the holiday peak period. The volunteers worked from 8- 10 a.m. and 3-5 p.m. each day and assisted guests with loading and unloading of skis on the busses and private vehicles. Volunteers also were stationed at the TRC and at the Slifer Plaza to provide information and assistance to our holiday visitors. As indicated, this program was successful beyond our expectations and we hope to implement it for the President's Day weekend as well. The success of this program was made possible by the outstanding efforts of Susan Connelly and Suzanne Silverthorn of the Town and Robin Litt of Vail Associates. They played an instrumental role in the organization and implementation of this program. Thanks to Rob Ford and Kevin Foley who were out introducing themselves to the volunteers and thanking them for their time and efforts. RWM/aw C:\Townmgr.rpt s • (.)Ilicr c>f Ihe Boar(I ilf (.~inmiliti%inni•rs IAt,Ir C.nnnly Iiitilclint; (970) 328-RGIIS ' P.O. f3ox 850 F;tx: (970) 37R-72117 - • 500 Ritl;idw.ry T[)f): (970) 328-8797 l.iag lt, (.;ulc7radu BIGi[ (?KSU - . . Deceenber 22, 1995 - 12A EACLE CO Y, COLORADO AGENDA ARU"'0"'F COUNTY GOMMISSIONE~~ PLANNING MEET91VG DAY JANUARY 29 1996 aar,aa~sa~~aananaaaa~~~r~ a orrnow~r~eraaraao~d oaemsr~$~m~e~~ma~e~~~~ma~~oo.~~am~Ab~a~ 1. 8:30 -10_00 9APORK SESSION - PENDIPIta LaTldaATi4N James R. Fritze, County Attarney flTEMS ON THE RECORD ~a J LSage IOaOc ° 10a15 a.m. P~. p ple1T A~e1¦D 1tBE~7cOLi/Y ggyIQ1~ ~p~o a7I~7~±NI~\~yl7 Kathy Eastley, Planning Techniuan, Community Deve.lopment 3. 10o16 -11:16 m.m. PD-342-95-S/P-COFIFLUEIVCE SITE Kathy Eastley. Planning Techniciara, Community Developrnent A~~„N: A Minflr P4JD far cons4ruction lay-down and parking mn 1 J acres. ZC-269-96-CQNFL ENCE SITE Kadhy Eastley, Planning Ter-hnician, Cornmunity Development ACT@ONe A Zone Change for construcfion lay-down and parking or9 19 aCres. fEagEe Board off County Commissioners Agenda, January 2, 1996 Page Two ' 9 t1b -9 9 oS0 ~e~uo BREAK . 40 91e30 -12o30 pomo PD-343-95-S-ST. CL4RE OF 14SSISI Sid Fox, Plartning Division lUlanager, Community Developenent AC~ N: St. Clare of Assisi Pariish Church, School, Pre-Schoml Rectory and 20 Dwelling llnits. 112o30 -11.:30 ~.mrue L IVCH 6_ 11.30 a1:3ffi P.M. FIPIAL SETTLEMER?T FOR YVESTERN MOBILE Eagle County Airpo~ S. 1:35 = 9 :40 pama A(aFtEEMENT BETINEEN EAGLE COlDN7Y AYVD KING TIRE RESOURCES. iNCo Eag(e County Landfiil ACT9ONe Consider approval. . 70 9:40 -1e45 p.m. A RESOLUTION N07°IFYfINO YH $TA?TE TFtEASURER TO DISTRIBUTE FEDERAL MINERAL LEASING FIINDS IN ACCORD W1TH TpiE PR01/16IQNS OF $34-63-102e C.R.S. Sherry Brandon, Eagle County Treasurer AC~ONo ConsideP approval. a0 9 a4S 4050 P.M. COFFEE Pt3T R AD _ PRQJEt',T 14GREEMERIT ISET11VEEN COIJNTY AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRiCULTURE F ItEST SERI/ICE Eagle County Road & Brfdge ACTBONe Consider approval. 9. To50 4:55 P.M. MT. SOPRIS TREE FARIVI PLAIVNiNG CONTRAC'T - . EXTENSION TIME TO MARCH 31. 1996. ~ 6Cathy Eastley, Rfanning Technician, Community Development AC°E'9ONo Consider approdal. Eagle Board of Counfy Commissfoners • ' Agenda, ,?anuary 2, 2998 Page Three 41~0 9055 -2:00 P.M. LEASE AGR EMENIT BETWEEN EACs°LE COUIVTY dlIVD HERTZ CORPORATION FUR QVERFLCJW PARKING AT THE EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL AIfdPO RT . Ea,glg Courtty Airport ACT9ONe ConsideP approdal. 91e 2:00 -2a06 [P.M. §ECOIVD AMENDIVIENT TO AVIATION RELATED CAR RENTAL BUSINE33 AGREEMENT AND LEASE Eagle County Airpork . ~~~ON_ ConsideP approvaB 12a 2o06 =2o10 P.M. FiNAL SfETYLIEMEN7 F0R GnACO CORPOMTIQN Eagle Coc,nty Raad & Bridge -AC49OM: ConsideP approval 2:90 = 2e30 poma BREAK 2:30 - 2:49 ~~~~~NT ALENDAR leama oio mutine ond nan-0ontroeemi4l nature a,re Plaoed on Iho oonaeM celendmrto albw the Board otCounly Commlsslonera to spend dm tcRa end mneRyq on mare irnpodant 9erm on ~ lengttiy egenda_ 61ny Commiseloner meg request Mat sn i4em fie °REMOVEO' fmm tho cronsent cnlemderend conatdemd aepamtely. Any menber ortne Pub6c mao 'REquesr amr Po.m 6m 'FtFMoVEO' irom the Coneent Agonft. 513e B@LL PAYI NG FOFt 7'liE WEEiC OF olAPlUAfBY 19 1996 Linda Pankuc,tt, A=unting HAark Silverthom, Controller AC45ON0 APPPObaI Subj@ct tO rBVICW by tI7e ChalPfftaP1. 94. PAY R0L[L FOR JAIVl1AfZY 4,1996 Mark SildertiioPn, ControlleP AC4UONa Approva9 saabDect to review by the Chairman. 7HE PoEI{T GAEE71fVCo O{; 7iiE EAGLE COUfYTY COBAMIGSIONERS 4%iLL BE HELD ON J/1NUARY B. 1YY6 ALL (WEEYIPSCaS WLL BE HELD IN 7HE EAC3LE COIJNTV BWLWNO - 00 gfiOADVIMIY. EAOIE • OR Q7NER1N19E PIOTED. . THIS A4EPdDA IS PRONIDED FOR IPIFORMqiIOMAL PURPOSES WdIY - A4l TIMES 01RE APPROJOMATE. T61E 9QAOtb lMiill.E IPf SESSlOPd MAY COPdS1DER o7HER ITIMS THAY ARE BROUGHT BEFORE IT. 4IL T 0 ~V:~l OF 1309 i'ai! Valley Drive Department of Public Works/Trqrrrportation Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21 SS/FAX 303-479-2166 Decembcr 20, 1995 Mr. Bert Hauser 7'own of Vail Transportation Division Vail, CO 81657 Dear ~ tt is a plcasure to forward the attacbed letter from Mcl Preusser, the Assistant Superintendent of schools for Eagle County School District RE SOJ. Your contributions in helping solve the school bus driver dilemma that faced the school dish-ict is recognized and greatly appreciated. I am espccially proud of you for taking your personal time and lending your expertise in solving this important community widc issue. It spcaks well of the dcpartmcnt; thc transportation division and for you personally. Again, thank you for assisting the school district. Sincerely, 4arry, L rafel Director xc: Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town M[anager Mike Rose, Transportation and Parking Manager Personnel File ~ EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE 50J i . ; i JOHN HFFIY - SUPERIMFNDFNT P.U. BOX 740 • FAGLE, COLORADO 81631 •(970) 328-6321 • FAX (970) 328-1024 December 7, 1995 ~ i Mr. Larry Grafel ~ Town of Vail ~ 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 . . Dear Mr.'Grafel: ~ ; I am writing to call your attention to the contribution that Bert Hauser has made to the ~ work of a recently convened Transportation Task Force in our school district. The work of this task force has been critical to addressing the needs of a bus driver shortage which we are currently experiencing. Bert's participation on the task force has ' required attendance at lengthy meetings in the evening and sometimes scheduled during the work day in order to meet the ambitious timelines described by the Board of ' Education. I am happy to say that the task force has met its responsibilities and has ~ been so efficient that we will be able to cancel one of the meetings previously scheduled. ~ On behalf of the Board of Education, I express appreciation of Bert's time and ' assistance in meeting this challenge. This kind of commitment and partnership is one of the factors that makes Eagle County School District a quality place to work and learn-a good place for our children. Thank you for allowing and affirming his participation. Si cerely, , i ! Mel Preusser Assistant Superintendent ~ ~ MP:pdm ; ~ ~ • i . ~ ~ rown of vaii . Sales Tau Es4imation 1iVorkshee4 12/27/95 x Changs % CAenge 1995 BUtlget fio!!I ' tfOT MOPl4a1 1864 1985 1986 1487 1m 1m 1990 1991 1992 1907 1994 Budget Estlmate Varlarrce 1994 Budge! January 742,262 881,304 890,5851,063,196 1,126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,855,364 1,805,707 1,869,600 1,693,104 23,504 4.84% 1260/ Februa 824,650 918,154 946,5521,135,786 1,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,828.766 1,814,495 1,883,100 1,814,425 (68,675) 0.000% -3.65% AAarch 1,084,814 1,187,520 1,316,652 1,378,782 1,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 1,988,090 2,250,656 2,326,900 2,137,616 (189,284) -5.02% -8.13% A ril 481,204 531,668 430,877 425,961 550,205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 864,303 794,668i 820,500 789,384 (31,116) -0.66% 3.791fo AHay 166,200 162,912 244,987 245,518 170,567 215,548 236,359 250,809 268,000 257,248 287,3151 296,000 322,973 26,973 12.41 % 9.11 % I dune 262,696 280,828 361,627 331,581 329,039 393,470 448,227 468,948 468,598 475,161 548,820~ 564,900 588,976 24,076 7.32% 4.26% July 406,462 447,815 479,507 479,201 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 811,538 892,830 928,100 891,712 (36,388) -0.13% -3.92% I August 402,792 386,985 512,513 536,904 575,887 668,119 678,071 761,992 767,257 825,954 891,5661 928,100 865,355 (62,745) -2.94% -6.76% S tember 384,864 340,102 374,060 442,402 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 753,200 642,836 (110,364) -11.36% -14.65% October 206,248 209,282 237,504 273,951 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367,578 400,525 408,4051 417,000 458,510 41,510 12.27% 9.95% November 310,588 229,083 376,657 386,270 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 497,907 553,681 594,491 605,300 603,038 (2,262) 1.44% -0.37% TOTAL u 5,272,780 5,575,653 6,171,521 6,699,552 7,198,624 8,696,466 9,139,677 9,582,511 9,757,424 10,421,165 11,014,158 11,392,700 11,007,929 -384,771 -0.06% -3.38% December 906,758 905,955 1,167,2801,245,612 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,775 1,846,223 1,974,553 1,992,855 2,057,702 ,::2.74,2::8 .:.::.;:..179,538 6,.481 608.:7,3.38,801 7945,164.:: 8,:554:::.; ,572 10,31.;1,.;.;744 10,~ ::.764,::: :.89.51i.: Tota{ 6, fi 1.1.::,.;;.603,64.7:.:12,.3>95,7.18 :,.13,00.::7,01.3. .I13,450,4 02 11,007,929 RECEI!/ED DEC 2 7 ~~~~ER D ~ s 01 g n s December 26, 1995 Mayor Bob Armour Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Bob: There are definitely economic trends which are having an adverse affect on Vail retail sales, and consequently, on Vail sales tax revenue. To give you some concrete information, I am providing you with sales data that is normally confidential. For the period December 1- 24, 1995, compared to 1994: Slifer Collection 230 Bridge Street Vail Down* -29% Slifer Designs 182 Avon Road Avon Up +53% Slifer Designs 601 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen Up** +76% The grovvth of population and services down valley plays some role in the net change; but, surely, other factors are affecting purchasing patterns. We hope that the final week of 1995 will improve the net change in Vail. However, we believe a careful economic assessment is necessary to identify the influences which are undermining the retail economic base in the town. Please take action as soon as possible to avert economic distress in 1996. Sincerely, 6ctL Beth Slifer President * The Vail store is up 2% through November 30, 1995, YTD, which could be reversed by negative net changes in December. Our Aspen store opened in November of 1994. The Aspen store is considerably ahead of projections, despite low snow accumulation for 1995 cc: Vail Town Council Members O(ficr. uF thr li(nrii 4-i1 (.:uinmissiuncr.; Ela,Ai- C(nmly liallr{ins; (`_)%0) 3l8-ti(if15 1'.0. ffox Still hix: (4170) 328 %lU'/ • 500 Hi»adw:ry <7:nlnr,tdo 81031-0850 . EAGILE COiyNT'Y, COLORADO December 29, 1995 -11:30 AMENDED AGENDA BOARD.OF COIJNTY CQNIMiSSIONERS P NNSNG MEEI°IIVG DAY JANUARY 2, 1996 lk1F3FA'A'RlS~i}3SYtIFkkiti7irik3FiFAllrlTiYiY91r1Yitir5YL7lkil'QlSilik{ftYSYikikt}{t.44{t4R/tAARtrRRR4AtrOQfltTSkR4tfr!ltt4fti! OTEINS ON TFIE RECORD 15o 2o50 -3.-W IRD-1 6r.Sl - AD M'S RIB COLF COURSE IYIEN12191P SKMH PLpN DENIAL RE50LlJTION James Frltze, Eagle Courltv AttoPnev y RECEIVED D'rL.' Z 1 19% , I=;~~inc~•rin< Dc~~~tmc~~~ '_-,~I~ c..cnint~huildir~ (070: 3i8-S760 Fas: (970,) 32ti-7118= lirc>aci~~a~1 I )i'J: .._~-8i,,~ ' . ,j~• ~ nfc;t: dt, 516~ l-tlti~l' EAGLE COUNTX, COLORADO ~ D e c e mb e r 22, 1995 Mayor Bob Armour ~ Town of Vail . 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mayor Armour: The purpose of this letter is to advise you that Eagle County has retained Attorneys to assist with actions relating to the proposed abandonment of the railroad rights-of-way and the merger application submitted by the Union Pacific and the Southern Pacific Railroads, and to inquire as to,whether or not you are interested in using the same counsel in order to achieve efficiencies.. Enclosed please find the curricula vitae for Fritz Kahn who will be handling matters relating to the Interstate Commerce Commission's handling of the application. Fritz Kahn is especially qualified for this task having served as the General Counsel for the Interstate Commerce Commission for six years. Also enclosed are the Curricula vitae for Stephen Alfers and Sarah Rockwell, both with the firm of Morrison E, Foerster in Denver. They are partnered with Fritz Kahn and afford us experts in the area of land use and land acquisition. Tliey are located in Denver which should provide us with a cost effective legal resource, when needed, since the Southern Pacific Real Estate offices are located in Denver. For your information Eagle County has been contacted by Lake County with their intent to use the same legal counsel for the abandonment. It is our hope here at Eagle County that you will join our effort to present a united voice to the Interstate . Commerce Commission in achieving our objective of preserving the ~ corridor for the benefit of the citizens of Eagle County. Please be advised that ou need to make a decision on whether or not you intend to participate because . ommerce ommission has set Januar 14 1996 as the date or w ic a par ies mus o icia y indicate whether or not t ey ' rrd o participate. I will be forwarding a draft notice of intent to participate which may be sent to the Interstate Commerce Commission once it has been finalized by Fritz Kahn. This should occur on or before January 2, 1996. December 22, 1995 Page 2 Please contact me as soon as possible concerning your intentions so that we may finalize our understandings and the equitable cost sharing arrangement. - If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (970) 328-8760. I will be gone next week so please contact me at home if necessary at (970) 945-4856. Hope you have a happy Holiday season. Sincerely, _ EAGLE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I~1/ . Arge Roussos County Engineer xc: James E. Johnson, Jr., Chairman (w/o enclosures) Eagle County Board of County Commissioners James Fritze, Eagle County Attorney (w/o enclosures) Chrono/file 1 SENT.BYa 12-29-95 ~ 12:45 ;CommunityDevelopment- 3034792157;# 2/ 8 Fgatx 21e Kahm a.rt. a Lawyer cpaabalazimg in the fi.alci ef adinanietrat$gre an$1 tganoportatioa lcaw. Nith offices at 1160 New . Xork kv=ue, WK, W&ghington, DC 200051 Mx:< Kalaa g~present,s botb sflbbppeis ratacl t~drrieY•a, x-a81~ ~d mot9r, bel0re the lnteretate ConnePCe c:ommission, tne U. S. Department o# TrangportiLtiarx and tha courts. . Amrag the moot pgowfnent of the caseEl hamUed by Ms. Rabn eaan hA8 8'eprese8i,t&ttioa Og the C$bacag0 and Nogth GTpm?:nrn Trannportataoin Cnmpamy in ft.E; rueeessful antry into the cesai g,roducarag Southern Dowd+em Rivor Bagin of Wyming, previoucly thc axclusive domaias of the Auz-13.mgton Uorthe= Railroad. Mr. ReLhaa repr~siEuaLed 4Bae Norfolk Oouthern Coggorataon asa ito acyuisiLiuu Ug Nortri Americaaa van Lintgo, Y1lC:. e and Greyhoaind Lines, Inc., in itgt acquisition of Trdlb~~S Li%1e8, 1nC. Mro Lqdiaa en~ered the private practice aftar serving izix years ffis the YCC'o Genegal .Councel. As the agency'a r-hiet legal of f icPr. 1e, . moaag other things, arguedi the Narthpv-n Unps cace before the 9up~eme f_rn»-i% 7e-adimg to the establishmant of ths, Burlington Nortpaern. Pailroad, Over tho objcction3 of the Departmeiat oL . JtactB.Ee' 0 Aritbt8%ot Diirimioxi. A-uttaar 9g ~g'gaac'~~~f H~9 ~o~ Cari•i~z• Rey~ala inn aiid Mg. K.aTn IS a tteql3ei1t sOarl,j-ibusLux 9:u tgaaaspox-tatioYl 3.aw jouggals aU, for earaaple, n Conaemaat9.on - An Altepnatgye Means gor Railgoad Line -1- SENT.BY: 12_29-95 ; 12:45 ;CommunityDevelopment- 3034792157;# 3/ 8' - - , Acquisitionsl' in the Fall 1993 issue.of the Transnnrtatinn al, and partiCipates often in panel diRrniRR9nns on transpartaL3on regulatol^y 1Fsi1PR . F$p has taught trunctportaCion c0urees at C2o Southeastern Vn3varsity it1 Washington and aC the V. S. Arrny Tranoportation School at Pt. Ilustis, YA. Mr. Xa2n is an Ordez aL l.lie Cuif and 1aw review graduate pt LtLe xativnal I,aw center oP Che George washington Cinivereity and a lmi tieta xappa ancs Omicron Delta Kappa gra8uate of the Columbian College of the Unfversity. Yie ia a member of the Assdciation of Tranapnrrari.on Law, GogistiCs aAd Policy, nf which hp war, Prwsident ia 1488-99, the "!`ranapnrt.Ati nn Regearch FQrtBtri, of which hQ waEi General Couneal fzom , 1979 ta 1987, tha Ameriaaa Bar Ancociation, the Fedesa]. Ddr AseociaCion and the TraiiBpOYtBt10n Lawyers AssociaL.Luil, Mr. Kahn ia married Lo Bllcit A. Xfron, atld they resiQe in Wa?slil.ziytan.. OCtober 1995 . -2- SF1VT BY* 12-29-95 ; 12:45 ;Communit Develo ment- 3034792157;# 4/ 8 I315TRICT OF CQLUMplA ' . YERAlElt. I.pIPFE12T.. 8ERNHAldl) NcPHEdf.SORI ARlD I3isBrict of Columbis Har; American Bar Associatiom JJA~ ' H1AND. CHARTERBA Was6ingtos--Contir,ued U5Xp 1%949731. Corpomre, Ent¢nalnmen4 spars. 'IHo" J. KEa.[,eR, born Indianapolis, Indiana, May 74 1943. Ag+prals, Fifth Circuit; 19$1, U.S. Court of Appcals, Eleventh CSe- adngyted tp bar. 1971. Disetict of Columbia; 1912, uut; 1983, U.S. Qaims Court nnd U.S. Court ot Apgwls for tLc 1977, U.S. 5uprnme Court. Edycatian: Uoivcr5ity of Akttm Fcdcrsl Circuit. Edmcation: Harvard University (A.B., cum Lmude, 1960. Anxhmn University (].D•. 1971)_ General C.pungd, 1966)- &iarvard [Jnivcrsicy IAw School (J.ID.. 1969). Facu[ty pyc pffice of the Preaideat, Office of "I'decommunicatiqm pd,,, LiRember, Tranx"tion Iaow Instituu. 1986. Aqerre6ey: The DiA- 1975-1976. Me„iber. 'Ibe District of Columbia 6ar; taict d Columbm Bmr; ?he Har Aseciciation of the Disuict of Co- 5tate Bar; Americsn Bar Aasoc.tiution; Fcdtral Comm~~ ltmbi:e; Amexiean Bar AesociaGion; Tcansportstion d.swyers Asso- Bar Assacistion. • c6atian (Chairnean. LegL-ilative Coaamittce. 1983-1986; Ytxipicat of Distinguished Savice Awrard, 1485: Secreeuy and 1bYember of JariN A. MERRiGAn, born LonB Ikactw IYeW York, ~ Executive Committ~. 1936~-). Tr~tation. Adrniralrrvatix la• 1448; admittcd to bar. 1973, District of Columbda. F~ao*; Law. Georgetoan University (A.&, 1970): I.dYola Univmity (im. eum laade. 1973~ Alpha Sigaa Nta. Autbor: 'Wiretsppint ~1)0, Fm7z R. MAxw, bnrn Ludw'tgshafea. Ciameny, 1Vovmbrr 12, matic Sccurity Caecs.' 20 I.oyola Univasity law Reyiew 1926; aimitted 4o bar. 1950, District of Colambia eaed Rduylaod; 1973-1974. Ccr.Authar: °C.aogress +n tbe Winga: Tbt C!necb 1961. U.S. Supremme ConrY. Educatinn: George 9Vaahiagton LJni- ~ Negotitatioos, 1974-1981.° 40 Washington and Lee d.err Review X aersity (A.A_. 1948; I.Y..B.. 1950). Phi Btita Kappa; Phs E4a Sigms; $pring. 1983. Member.• Tliee Distrirt of Columbia Bar;: /?igiftqM Ornicron Ik,ita ICaPPa; Order of tbi! Caif_ IMemtrtt, GeoBe Vl7aah- 7lar Assoiatiaa. inaton UniversiYy I.aw Review. 1449-1950. Author: "SriDCiples of Motor Carrier Regularion,° Wm. G Brown Cvmps?ny. Aubuque. fltiCff[aeto L. CYS, born Boulder. Cn(ocada. Oceober IA, 1958; "Fecierml I.imitztions Upoci Statc AQotor Catrier Taxs- admit~ to bar. 1%9. Disuiet of Columtria. Educatimn: Uaivayt~ tion and Regulaeion: 32 ~'emple fl.aw Quartedy 61. Fall. 1958; of Cnlorado a4 Boulda (B~.S.. ~vieh honors. 1466); Qpq~p~y@MUer's Lew of Freght Y.cm and I)amage C[aitns; Wm. G University (J.D.. 1969). Iaw Qerk to Hon. Jahn PMt,.6J,g. 4a Orown Cornpany. Dubuque. iA. 2nd ed.. 1961; "P1F.PA and the trict Judge foY We Dishict of C:olumbia. 19e9-1970- , Aduwal U.g. ' HCC." 41 ICC P~rinnerx' Journr~i 204, Jaaunr.y-Febrasry, 1974; A~rocl+ for the Distriet of Columbis, 197a1977. A/t~ g* °The d~ormacion o[ Railroad ~gnletioa: 43 ICC Proetetioncre' of ~utl°~ Assatiation of the Disteict p} (o. 3ourna] 309, May-June, 1976; °Atmlition of ehe'TrwAing Exanp- luanbia; Ameriraa Bar Aseociatian; intcr-Amcricam _BM~,A!~p~. tion: Pros astd Cons," 48 flntilrust I.,aw Journal 555,1979; 67 ICC ~on. l.irigaaton. Iraremotionat TYad~ -rR';~~EI Yructiticmers' Journal 154. patiuary/Fcbruary. 1980; °AlTotor Car- Jcjwt[ Y,. MANsom, IIY, bOt11 Richmond, Vitsink'~ Q rier Regulatory dtdorn~-Fai¢ Aca:mpli," 19 Transportatiori L•rw 1949; admitted ta bar, 1974, 1975. District of.8 , Jaurt?al S, 9Hiater. 1979; Pfhe ltcvalving Doo[-Should Yt Be ~~j~ Univusity af Virginta B~S., 1970} F.mory,U~ p'~ Iq 5top~d,° 32 AdminiAtrativc YAw Remicer 388. Spriag. 1980; CJ.D., 1974D. ,Pbi Delta Phi; Omicron Dtlta ICappe.. bfembeP, i 'Keogh's ICaput"49 ICC Practitiorxrs' Journa1478, JulylAugust Board of Mtm, Emory Laav Jonrnd. 1973-I974. Antbor,'D~ . 1982; "Rescoring 8rown & Shoe: Railroad Mergers aad tlze Anu- versity )wuwctian--Appaintmcat of Ancillary Admioistritoe ta ~ trust Laeas.° 32 Transp. Prac. J. 40. General C.ounsel. Interstete Ddmt Divasity." 23 Journsd a4 Public Iaa. Clisitmen.'fiieatielb . Commerce Commi9sion. 1970-1976. General Counsel, 1Vationsl Natiana) Conference of l.aw Reviews, 1974. Membtr.' Tbe ~ Bus T'rsffrc Associntion. 1995-. Gcacral Counseb Trsnsportatiou of Columbia Hsr; State Har of Georgi~ Americsn Bor A~ocLtb~ Re9earch F~onem. I979-. Adjunct Qnbtructor. 'rhe U.S. ArmY (Mcattba, Scction of LBhar and Employmeot Law)- I~ . '%'ransportarion ~cx~l. 1979-. A9embey 'd'he %)istrict of Colutu- po~teon. bia Bae; Fedenal and Ameriean Bac Avsadatians; TrAnspartation v•A ~ Y..~wycrs A~atirn?; AssocisUOn of TranR~rt~tion Ptactitioners. L JoHN OS~Ru, ~~'n Walthatt~,lVlaSeachusetts. APt~I; i B; admitted to bar. 1974, AAassscLusetts; 1978, Disdriet of Cpi~o~bi~ I . WRUBtE, bom ~ilkes-Burre, Pmnsytvanie. Ed~ecarion.• Hoston Cdlege (A_H.. 1970; J.D-. I974). R''~~ AIa• ~ BEawH,~tnT K March 21, 1942; udmitted to bar, 1968, A1ew York; 1972, U.S. tiunal Muut Couct Competitlon, 1973. Appolate AttWncl;,016c't Supreme Conrt; 1981. DixtrieY of Calumhia. Lducatioa: 66?'illicros of Geanerdl Counect. Iaterstate Commtrer Comtnisr!,,~~ CollcBe (B.t~.. 1963); Univcr.rity ~ Pennsylvsaia ,(9.Y..B.. eum 1976. Aplxllate Attorney. Antilruse Division, U.S. Ikp~~ laude. 19(i5). Member, Order of thc Coif. Editar, Uniwrsity of Justice, 1976-1977. Member.• T'he Distriet of Colwnbia Pennsylvania l.aw Review. 1965-1966. Law Clerlc to Iionorabte ican Bar Association (Membec. Antitrust anQ Pnblec,I~'~!,~ i Phillip Fnrmxn, U.S. Court,of Appeals For ehe Tlird Ciecuit, tions). T'ienspartarion, Enrr~. Aneitncst 1467-1968. Parmer. Simpson 'fhatcher & 6iarlett, 1974-1977 (Pe9' RAYmOPID S_ SCZU8L0. boen Qksn. tVew 7'ortc: Juiy l6.1lit. eaciate. 1967-1973). Principal Ikpuly Gcneral Couasd to t6e 1Ze- . gmtemme of 4he ~+rmy. 1977-1978. Dieeeeor, Oi6ce of Governmeut ~mittod to bar, 1975, Diatrict of Q:dumbia; 1980. U.~g~ Ethicc, 1979. 1Sxecutive AsRistant to the Seere4ary and I)eputy CjOurt• ~ucattm Unevecmty of Detroi4 (8bi•E.• 3971} .awr i. Socretsry o[ Einergy, 0079-1981, Executivc Director, Preeidrnt'e town Univcrsity (J.D., 1974). Case aad Note EditoY, 1,610`0d Interagency G~al Eaport 7'aisk Farcc. 1990-1981. ~fernbeP• The ~ Tntemational Boaineas, 1973-1974. Au~~: Yr . Dietrict of Colo~mbia lDar; The ~iatiun of the Bar of thc Qty wg ~w and EF~' Deploymeat; Journat of R~ r?c ai Idew York; American Bar .cx.tiation. Liaigatlop. Corpomre. I3I, Pdo. 1, Merc}i. 1981; °Aaatrp6t A9pects oi Sbsrod tcma ]vurnal of Retail Banking, dol. In, No. 3. : STUARr F. Pmxsorv, born Wal+iogton, D.C. lunc 33. 1943; 1981; °I'Le Marioc Midland Decision and Shared ATJ~ ~ . ~ , radmitte?i tu bar, 1969, I7istrict oY Columbin; 1974, U.S. Suprcne BankinB Expanaion Reporter. irol. 3, No. 20. &**W! Court; 1984, Ide~r York_ ,~ducativfl: dlobart College (~.d., cutn Memlxr. Rnrrd of Directors, Childrea's Hospla( N!~ ~ laude. 1965}, Y)uke Llnivtrsitq Y.aw Schoal (7.D., i968). Phi DClln cal C~ter, Washington. D.C., 1985. Member I7?e Du~ d~ Phi.llVith U.S_ Detwertment of Juataee. Cti~rii Qtigfats Divieion, 1968- lumbi~ Bae; Americaa Dar Assa:iati~ (Member, ~°4W1971. Asr,istant U.S. At4orney. Westan Diatrict of VVashington. toinationat Law; Carporatioa. Banking und Hatiaew IA*~~ 1971-1973. Specisl Assistant U.S. Attoincy, Watern E)ir,triet of ican SoeieYy of IaBernational Law. D~nmestic ond I~aa~,. Washington. 1973. Member. The Y)istrict of Cdumbia Har; Ameo- ComwoePCia171+ansntt(ort.x Banking aad C"aspovote iean Bar Assdc,tiation; The Ascati&¢aon o['Trial [a?wyers of Amee- icL Media Faev, Govevnmenf Iavestrgariogg C'wremerrfa! Lifigahon. RooErt M. WFtn.tAw, born Niorttclsir. Idew Jers~9 12, 1936; admitted 4o bor, 1962, District of Col?mtb~ HowEE.L E. BEG1.E. JR„ born IDetrait. Uochigan, January 4. Suprane Cain; 1985. U.3. Distiict Courc, IDNist~ 90 1944; admitted 'to 6nr. E969, Ncw York and U.S. Cowt o! Rtili- Educatiox: Georgetown Univemitq (A.B.. 1959; . • [ . f,ary A,ppeals; 2974. District of Columb;a_ Educaflac Univcrsity of T6eta Phi. Antbor: °BeuEccuptcy-A IItemaly far ik~.~It fhe South (B.A., cum laude. 1~I65}, Institute 9ar /~mcrican U,uiver- Distrcased Client,° Diatrict of Columbia Har 1~~'~ 9ities. Aiu-m-Provcnce. F'reuce; Univicnitp af N[iChipu (J.D.. cum "fhe Danlcmptcy ltuiee: A Pracxdura! Step r~91°~' i lau" 1968). Ordr,r of the Ccrif; Pi Sigma Alpha. Member. The Har Aseocaeticm Judge's Journal. fDctnher. 1974; -fbc ~ fTAls Caud G,etinucd) Fw signiJtmrme of YieW of law rn hae,WyAirnl skvuAef. spe Esploaatnry Nows on iuide nner. SEIVT BY: 12-29-95 ; 12:46 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 3034792157;# 5/ 8' I~ . r:0~~ ~ 14 ~ 40 = il4F0 D~TdVET~ . . 903 888 0240 ~ ~ SOWT BY : • MOu aIsO:v & FOExs'rEtt 1AfQ PNAN~7APl1 ATI~IW d!Y IST frAw [~W ID=1C 1K11/MNCTnP?. R~ S7AS KMOL7C 6la?2w tAlbON .CRA.C.E +-`uLN1'Y NY 1?7f! yU= 11Miq K yww ^64v eawwm C3u0Kwsj0 s~ ~ uClr4 Ia71MC 1MAIJiJf LIIZ ]1lL~ i~l1l~~ . . . l01wY1ta ~ , ~ . - • . ~~.1.. . . u . • ~ 'Y A . ~r1~t+her 7d.1S~1S - ni~ti. enn~ i'~~• u[.~, . ~ . -59Z-Z26S By Ta]eCkaimi1e Heary vV. tpBea, Eeq. - ~ Y tplaie, Rvbats & Owm. LLC ; 1700 T..incaia Sftct~ Suiti 4100 ~ . . . ~ L]evtr. Colrn-.ds 60203 ~ R . - - • . - . _ . ~ Kr_: NaQle Gvaittty . . . _ _ . - - ~ Da`ac klYnSc: • , . . - - ku+ao Asos to tti(k +vah yoY dge morning. VHc muol? appwists yaur tTIird.inu uf m w help oat y2ur clinat, Fagle County, . Since we apoke rh16 marnhj& l haYe Icimed th,s wrc hsue oolm~de*abk expaimm wlth vscatlnF rlglzcs of way. My pa'RUCC. 5arah Rmkwell, md i huve hoth wodcad wtth tliuil u? dic pmt. Sarsh.ln facT, s 1ew ,resrs sp 4d 9uborrtul excriow. ncscftjRtS vacaccd Aad aiuviduum! riMW or vwy tn YMcln CnM. ntL 0f 'tl1a pm]ect invnive+i rmting public agms uc twueetts in ctmectiosl wlth ebafidmcm aPYhe ci=ha nf wag. . 1 aR+ fax;% with this lotter grufessionol rontmark3 iw Samh nnd me. We can diacount our raua offbring aOiacoo~ ra* of VO.00 pot hour for bath $uah's time aad ruine_ rhis projeCt will iixvalvr iand am waric and inatysiz of 9paciCic w=% dcc& md rm. rr,vAtions. Aceordingly, we avould lUcL1y weat to ueo junivr anvr.iama and pandapla • ahere x~r~+ri~t~s Wew.~uld dr~ ehu ranly..,itl+ pr~~f~ent appravn{ ~+datlsr ~t~~;.,g their hiUing rates with fhe clrsnf, ' Wc tmvc vac c:liam wl'dti shaveholdem md dlrccrors canmen tn 1lcrver kio [;rxedn 1rOroad. 1'I~ia ol ioni QWcy~ Cwnenunloe~laot. Whfie i dv not tCC mat enpguuneRt aR p canfliot Of illto[C9t, j du w&nL Vo m6ka, 1llat t1iwIvvYIC. 'tf them le ahyehing tinther tio youc neEds, plense c.alt. . . Sincerely, ~ f'~ft~7VCI~ U. I~,yyCiJ d1~2!(15 SF1N7' BY' 12-29-95 ; 12:46 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 3034792157;# 6/ 8 ~ Ssqr ev- ~ d4-99 ~0 DMV&- 903 Hd 0200:9 31 5 ~~OFESS~ONAL S-UliiMAKY STEMEN D. ALP= Stephm D. Alftd jalwd ds film in RYovmdcr 1992 in a Parl= in avr LVttveP offim fatteWi% hvd-w pcws as apytne• at die Deitrr,r BaW Gfirt af 3?svig, Urahh= & StubbL I10 h" his DA, MA. dcgmO ;u F.cunrmiO AOm Or tJniveiBitY of DWM. CA~Orl, Eroeia e90 PLmaagh 8973 bo ser?ad foUC YM as 11 U.S. id!?val OM=9 with twu wadtabe dtpluyammls wilh 3he amphfb101iS SDl= ID s+oUth c3ct In 1975a W A9fct~ xadiwcd tawsa tbr Unri=sity of VVZWR Sc11001 of u.aw. MSa Afms. pbib't~~ ~ amwtraW 1n1ntQmiSZI oKI t1s117BE.1'Llf'. ffimp`p,1m oaa WuLtf utdeaacs in lhe Hu3imS 01 develouintl pmecious Ntd hase croPo, cwl, urKnfuffi aud u1hcr wicnp anitacrah, and lndustcial mhrrWs in ttw j Jnitrcf Smfirm, Nou(6 Amexlca. . ataal ntkwfwe6gacauaftim 'fhat wosfC hoe Wcluded 9nejnr ncquWWrn]S mad litigauom_ Ttlpatslp tlim!fficiat h&.9 hi3t0lklly plyCd ap1 imNrplM. pM ffi'dfe deV6fljuflCK4t ut ~~~eW =WMo AnO W. Q9ID• cIkm 6ncI1kI[: _IApmC$eo Gcrmw4 liQj(wL baDdl2ay . Excacl 88d other foacip entilits in soqvltinE n+W davdogfq bawe xnd precinus nestalt, . Wuskiaf mfiMraYs W emW pqocM in the UaiOcd Srams. W AUh:A ho rqpm%WPA vn4winb clae.nts in the acquisYdea ef mit9ing Pt'oPmt% fUsuatlm of mlsvlsng wnh=nv, AmMna aad negr?liating mioaeg aCro+trMi4 md nll *3e8 of dsy 70 dU explamtian, devefopmcix~ snd mining vpcnations. In zecent yaaso, RRr. Abfm ia tmm wwklj* on xvisiow to tbs cening, enviroguesamtoill, oil ;sEd Bas, and G?rdr In flawo in counides the warspresented 1d, mart rwcnly actiag sn bcholf of . 4h(l GOVmm=t of Adosigalis. Adr. AlE'ers ha atso cricnu an thG cucil.oe,aunn . ~g ~aaas~~4n~ anenl~aaag ~iog ~rop~rtY.~r ~aaporate aoquisitioa~ ~ Scuth Amerisou nd ¢be 1ormerS9vkt LJnIa& 'Alfars hu 14ndlnd xipificc=ttaainingl{tig,ntiou, ippoariiap, befvm *AcW and stgo " ataw ugeneles, end ehft end BeUrd tri,ett uad auxkc comis waiind the WUA SWM. is adraattcd to pcdm in Yhe State oE Calorailu, ttu UmaBad StateS Dimoc6 Courc fos dw Da-ArieB of Co:oz~, to QJr,imd 5taaes COLIK u4' Appuk fbeft R~'r~ath md Toutta C' 'aW the Z)natsd Saaeo 9cyrmm Cuaect %o Jw%6- ef aWy, Is&Wan wts inteoducod in Cong= to =pcnI tbc Cgaicaml Mini I..M of 1873 md eo dqssiets snmv aosinnat mWng law. Sia= 1989fl WU,, AtOas kAm ~Pmm ft4iee~ ~tha tlnitod Sum Sotaatc aad ehc Housc of 1tepMentative5 to tapliry a[ ne?aly heariq m mpea% an thg lovv. Siacc dat time he hu acted uu bdfna,lff of majvir miximB inamt?ay us& .ase*eseat6w !fl amestiom with rAking law Ati'ea= mw4lem Hohmded the miximg Wduay pr4not to mdp lbs cwwmici,mplications df vafl9ait3g B~Ab,'' ~a Csm ~f~ LaYt?. In h1ae6633y IMp MP. AlfCTS p1LbTtdwd $ha4 m4dp, • hen4,=6 Impact of Wmins %aw Rdfom.° Mo,lblters has fauowsd up dwl c nn 53,~0T WOZ-80 SENT BY: 12-29-95 ; 12:47 ;CommunityDevelnpmenty 3034792157;# 7/ 8° 9M SY' KOFO D",. 303 8~f'+ 02444 4/ 5 . wortc with aagoiag rcp=nUWcwn (,e;,,du:try;n wmh;-dtR,n in eonaeve+am vvith mining law tctbtm and ndicr nadnnhl irxinztry bsucs. W Alfrxs' pnbdiaadgms inctude tha tellovdna: °A C,omparniw Molydy of . Mining fm And Royaldes." (14ozrisos & roeretar aed Cocpem & Lyhr.jesd,1993?, "'lhc FtxfllpmUG Im~ ~f UlAmg 1.AW ]ti'fO!'mj u (akvia. ~m & .~~1bbs pmd C00pw! f_ybvnd,1WZ); "Coping with Noing LaW Rdnrm." Rak- Mft Adffrr, L, rnse. (t 791 , "Sudkoe Use Agrtaamb;l RlgMs ofAeam md Swf4raQ Ui@ Pajer Na 2 (tocky Mt l1din- L. Pomdsfiva 1984); nhe Uttaimn Royatty Today," 35 Roeo Mtn. JIk L lrur. t 9-1(1979x "D=ps nnd Dili»gs," 23 Rarky 11dm Aft L. hnr.171(1978); md "Accommadbtl4n or prcrmptinn? 5sonu md Pedeeai Control aFNi,?arc Coei Lands in ql?yorning " 12 Imd 8 Waior L, Rirr. 73 (1477). . W. e41fet+s bas bw an adlumt Ptolcg,tor of Lsvr at 'I% Unimsaty of Qanver, ' tea:l~mg Miaing Law. Hc wae hornod ea tho 1940 AMAX Distinguisdod f't"tiujwx-in- Rcaidcru:e ot Tbe Uutvozeity ofDcnvca Collo=c of I,a•v. In cvtwettivu wiiL tLc AMAX appoiOnvat, Mr. .+ilfen ddivCrr.d a 9t:iss af lechm vn wudcw m;ui~vj uyuwtivns. . Mr. Alfcrs is a racmba or shCC amku Her Ajwxdalicm tke Coloredp Hat Associotleu, ind Ihc Gc,lareda MininA Asur.-Wun. He t-a mved as a 1MW ofthe Rocky biountain Nmccd Law Fawt3asivti fiu mnv yuss. Cuncatly Mi. AltLfca it a . n,wtbr.r o f t6v Duard of blrectors uf do Colcxwlv MbxinQ Msoeialloa. Ylx hmi heetl actirc iu tlu Mincral Law sutiuu uP i}w Cukw8d0 Daf ABSOClBiioL 9mAn~ WSW" froaiL 1961 ay 198Z, YWe Clusii,nan hom 1982 td 1983. and ChaI:man Rc+r~ 1 (181 m 1!)84. He lms l=n lislal in ?9tr Bcs! I.awl+dR Lt Mvica aad Wk's 16'hn Ut krrir.tH:ft 111tvma}x sincc 1989. ~~0 ~ ' ~ Ot:ar eain~.an ~ SENT BY: 12-29-95 ; 12:47 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 3034792157;# 8/ 8 SE'NT BY' NOFO DENVER- 303 886 0200;r S! 5 4 ; . iF T1 ~3 g If dD N A!!. ~i YJ m m Am Y . ~ ta M. Rocxvm.L 4 Mso Rockwell ae t pamerr in an perxnr affict, vsialiring iat laW uue WA I iaw md genag ecal cetafae She bW ber yraaiz ara Dtanvxr nad !wa =enay. elr+atftc3 dwn Wfta d°agc poM ln ft flrm'ffi San lFMXisM atAcc. I+b. RoClcweU rewved txr B.A..OqM 8~r~i 5~ $YWversq afi 1910 a~rod iriv @av degew fsam Bosroa iJuiveaxity in 14991, 41w. vtso Wds aMastea°a degen isa Chy Planniq fgm MAnadtusetm taieciwcc af f~4s. Ror.kve99 has G=Metled pubaic en0ft. LandMvnm. imrMnd $nd k-.~.$ a~ ~ on wttta uvzridy eW H14nd use and amirometasl mmeera. SM !2o paRiailar mert6c . 9n 81maing nd a.oaia~, historac pme,rvaa'm. tr=sponetion asd aie "tiqr ianuA. gf,c ai3s ~l~,s 1 a~Y sa~,s ae~Q~as. W11oe in 30 Fme, R9A. k _98 wa4 involv+d in B wede eratiety of pubiir, plsawng APd l9rA lLn IutlPs_ Sk WW mnipT YC'Spomtbllby on dprojiL$1i{m 6OL rqntKmOd tk , C9lim of cOett[z Coagg 0n SAI6SEC66i0Y9 wlth ft COWq`g prcouvi Q!$' a ctJlri{1M11CJNIVL1 updaee of ft Coneas CosU OAStug GcnecaI E'1au atln CerrMPMlding Ovlannmerttzl bpU . TWOET. 3W SBlO ddnl3od " OW afii CSK111tY Of SAn Rznri~',,:b 9tl eWnMBiAi6 with " envammnrmva9 ncar6m ma9 appaa%-J of rhe new Master Fltte fos elw 9m FmecL9so %ncsnaaeiohs9 Aarp-a MW peavedee oago6reg coUqgU[tg eo e66 aizpore aa tbo Ma,tr.r P1aa ia*4&nt2euu1uea. . $IM WneiMes se Wv$ae me*A XAise¢ ftratr.tuaIC va penNtdr* ata emJdq1in lnucs rrlatud t1D tltc &,edvpm.sa3 af t1m adliain in Plotibugy Wiornia. ' Duffins hcr easlete pmccke in Dae»er. %q& ytadcwelt wm iavoivcd in tbe prqmrstiun of Qbo deAign Bvaew Oy4i~ for ft 4OWGF 1Bownlc+wii Iaix1ax16 dhtia sn4 Teptesstlted semxl !ovnz dsswnttama pmprny a9wmrs in gelik[(on to ft Ci[y's opplavaf of $eeniptdseziw pin YAP Dovcr ~ PiveE' IVWIey.S7ie aasce handled rea9 eseaee aod i6nft ccaieteaesicm for 9~~4ier~ atK~ ~r:~•e!@~ee eli=. . U9. Rwkw;!6e is nmeniber me ehe Cdluradu, CaliCuretia NMd Aieriean h2r asociaYain. and tFae fYD16a'aC8at P1ig[qA18ig ASPSCAaxic,m. She also aervei On ehe boad o8' de YnmrmiPe IiesWnYEoti Truse. Shg ds !k@psed an pr.=iw. tRw in bath Cabrado znd Califarnia. Y~ ~oo~ ~ Ja A~ : S1Y Cat,69 oan - - . TH]E ~ALL STREE9C JOYJIR,RTAI[: FRIDAY, DECEIVIBER 29, 1995 , 0 , c~~ - A ~ en Has,.More'u~~cn~ a,a~•~~ C'ele-bnod ~ ~ ~ BY FEI.ICIA PAIK . tery class of regular visitors and va- ' ~ - : S26,f~,f R2QOTI2f Of THE WALL $TREET:IOURNAL After 25 years of calling Aspen, '"There are a lot of 'in' places to go now," says Loren Jenkins, the . Colo., home, Richard Rudolph moved former editor of the Aspen Times. away from the resort hamlet in Octo- ber. "The town has completely "The cachet of coming to Aspen, in changed," says Mr. Rudolph, a real-es- some circles, may have become tate investor who has resettled in Ari- somewhat of a cliche:" He adds that zona. "When I used to go backpacking, z 'some emigres are seeking "a place I'd run into maybe three people. Now that is more exclusive and unspoken when you go, there's a crqwd." ; of like Aspen used to be." For Mr. Rudolph and some others, Among them: Telluride, Colo., this ski viUage high in the Rockies ~ which has become popular with Hol- . isn't the easygoing, exclusive en- ,lywood stars; Jackson Hole, Wyo.; clave it once was. Multimillionaires ~ : > where"President Clinton spent his : mer vacation; and Sun Valley, still flock here, especially this week sum between Christmas and New Year's tionally 'Idaho, 'where New York financier z.~ ~5 annual con-- when Hollywood's power elite tradi- Herbert Allen holds h. ence for the movers and shakers • descends en masse. But many fer of the wealthy who made Aspen a of the media, entertainment and fashionable winter playground and computer industries: summer arts colony are moving on- Now, at the height of Aspeds winter season, the year-round popu• to trendier pastures, or into estates or condominium communities away lation of 5,400 has swollen to 40,000. from the center of the two-square- - -~e The puddle-jumping commercial mile town. flights from Denver are booked• Aspen's residential real-estate mar- solid. The hotels are full. There are ' ket has saffered accordingly: Rou+n nnocirei,i long waits in lift lines. ¦ The number of homes sold is Movie producer Ted Field's down 40% this year, and the average 15,000-square-foot mansion sits near sale price has fallen to $1.7 million from more than $2 mil- 0 Among those trying to sell out: media baron Ru- the gondola at the Little Nell ski slope. Mr. Field bought lion last year. pert Murdoch (asking $5 million), publisher Mort . the estate along with other property in 1988 for a reported ¦ There are now 15.6 houses priced at $1 million or more Zuckerman ($9.8 million, down from $11 million 18 $16.3 million: It's been on the market for several years, at . on the market, compared with 126.at the end of 1994. months ago) and tennis champion Martina Navratilo- what. some local brokers call an "unrealistic" asking • ¦ The most expensive t?omes can languish on the mac- va ($8.2 million). price: $16.5 million, the highest in town. ~ ket for years, and local brokers acknowledge a four-to- Newer winter resorts have pulled some jet-setters away, Real-estate agent Carol Ann Jacobson, who has the flve-year inventory. from Aspen, even as Aspen has.begun attracting a less glit- . Please Turn to Page 88, Column 4 ~ . . . .~~~eno More Cliches an Cachet? Crnctinued F'rom Page BI prominent banker, and she's the daugh- listings for the Murdoch and Field houses, ter of movie mogul Jack Warner), have , says it takes at least 18 months to sell such put their large homes on the market but properties. Buyers, she says, can be skit- pian to stay in the Aspen area. Restau- tish about purchasing a home from rateur Paul Chanin, whose Pinons is a "someone who is a name, because they popular local hangout, is looking for a don't want publicity." new, smailer home in a golf-course com- Aspen ance offered the rich and famous a munity outside town. low-key yet luxurious refuge that some old- Mr. Chanin, who has lived in Aspen for timers complain has vanished with the in- a decade, disagrees with those who think flux of touristy crowds and mall-type retail iYs overcrowded. "With only 5,000 who stores. A Banana Republic outlet and a Hard live here year-round, whaYs a couple of Rock Cafe have sprung up in recent years. hundred more?" he says. "I think Aspen Originally a mining town, Aspen be- has all the charm it ever had, and in fact, came a haven for well-to-do entertainers I like it better the way it is now." and counterculture types in the '60s and There are still plenty of moneyed peo- , then, in the '70s, wealtY?y vacationers who ple moving in, but for the most part they mingled easily with the ski bums who mi- aren't household riames. Some, like newly grate here annualiy, minted Netscape Communications Inc. bil- Recalls Mr. Rudolph: "When I first lionaire James Barksdale, bought existing gat here, I used to play golf with my homes this past year, garbage collector. That would never More frequently, the newcomers are happen today." building residences outside fown and Though auto industry magnate Lee Ia- away from the.ski slopes. This group in- cocca and race-car driver Danny Sullivan cludes Jim Fifield, chief executive of both recently sold their homes here, As- EMI Music Worldwide, a unit of London- pen retains plenty of resident starpower. based Thorn EMI PLC, and Jamie B. Gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson Coulter, chief executive of Lone Star is still a full-time resident, and recently Steakhouse & Saloon Inc., a restaurant led a successful fight to block an airport chain based in Wichita, Kan. Former expansion. Other homeowners include ac- Wall Streeter Boyd Jefferies has gone tor Jack Nicholson, movie producer Peter into the home-building business; he is Guber, Walt Disney Co. chief Michael Eis- trying to sell an 11,000-square-foot spec ner, dieting maven Jenny Craig and Sun house for $7.9 miilion. • Microsystems Inc. co-faunder Bill Joy. As Aspen broker Sandye Whitaker . ~ Some longtime residents, including says, "These people can go anywhere they t Mort and Lita Heller (he's a locally want, but choose to come here." . . RECEIVED DEC 2 9 ~~!nc ~OLORADO RIVER HEADWATER F~RUM X ~ 405 Broadway C) PO Box 2070 Eagle, Colorado 81631 970/328-7052 7elecopier 970132$-7051 December 27, 1995 Dear Colorado Headwater Forum Participant, I have incorporated The Colorado River Headwater Forum, as a non-profit corporation. Begirming in January, 1996, this new corporation will sponsor the Forum. No membership is required in this new corporation. The business of the corporation will be controlled by the Board of Directors. We need interested persons to serve on the Board of Directors. We will have an organizational meeting after the CRHF on January Sth, 1996. All interested persons are encouraged to participate. If you won't be attending the meeting, but would like to participate on the Board or would like more information, please call me. We will adopt by-laws and settle other corporate business at the meeting. . The Forum will continue to operate much as it has. The new corporation.will merely operate the business side of the CRHF activities. Please advise your bookkeepers that all future payments should be remitted to: ~ The Colorado River Headwater Foundation P.O. Box 2070 Eagle, CO 81631 . . . Tax ID (ElN) 84-1326793. Accompanying this letter is form W-9 for your records. One final announcement: Richard Howard will be ending his association with Lindahl Associates as of the end of this month. We wish him well in his new endeavors. Sincerely, Kevin B. Lindahl sueicmre Form REQiTEST FOlt TAXPAYER IDENTMG-MON c,xo.wo lx,~mRn: ct ad,nu;sotioo W_9 NTJNMER (TIlV) 'VFRM' CCATION no NOT sena w rns PRT.NT OK TYYE Lega1 Name The Colorado River Headwater F r m no xcrXN7rx-r~m su:Ness xnIMeF A so~aaorrt~soaset~on ~ta~ - sQ a~,ss ~~oo~.v mru~,n+do~ I'rade Name CCI.(DL,ET m.tY iF DMC 8LME55 AS ;MWxl. Mailing Address P. 0. Box 2070 Cinr,Stace.?ip. Eagle, CO 81631-2070 Remit Addrrss - Optivnai City, State, Z:Q, . Ordcs Address - dptional C:ry. State. ?ip, Checb:leaal entiry type snd encer 9 di;it Tazpayer ldeari6cation Number (TIN) beIow: I (SSN c Sotial5aeaity Niattbet QV a Ecuployer (dendficr.tion Number) ~ ~ Individual (Individual's SSN) - - - - - - - N6lE 7vn nre a d¢kd m a Jvint .twcw= vhen tlKee irnqwc mm a~e ~um~ ihe mmbQ -ill Eo ooeqaema m he duc oi die fint iows lifrd . ~ Soie P'roprietorshig (Owner's S5N or Bus,iness FEIN) • SSN rro~ Z,vereom ae v&.dsssr ana as a-;-e snv rrfrYYc mquimd mh~ OW E~ - ~ Parmership ? General ? Limiced (Partnesship's Mi) - - - - - r D FSfBtEI TI71St Ci.c5d1 EJIAN'S E~l~ ~ - Nt7?E: Do =Li+v.iab thv iJsndelcoma nm~ M Pe IYrarol ¢pe~aeta~i.e .x xumee unlas tte F.~I mtilY :9di is r.ae aesiErnxd ia Ne osoe.rt U0c. l1i wA ei/de de name d me ke.aJ vw-L ea:t er pea+ion a~.ae - - - - - - ^ a Othes Groups of IndividnsLs (Endty's IIN) _ cc.osef !:AM.. cwwwr. J-= v-v~ A.«l-dm, cnbl - - - - - - ~ Corporstion Do you pTovide medical services? D Yes No (Corp 's ~ g 4- 1 3 2 6 7 9 3_ e1~1~a.. o~ooas pmv+ainF menal sluiogssr'rW ~ Govecnmeut (or Governm=t Opezated) Encry (Ena[y's EIN} - - - ~ ~ - ~ F-I OrganQStion Emwapt fram Tax uuder Sectian 501(a) (Org's EII+) - ~ _ - - - - ' + Da you provida medical scrvices? ? Yes ? No - Q Check Here if you do nac have a SSN or ETN, bat have applied for oae. See rzvmc ior inforroation on Hew to Ohrairc A?7N. Licerse3 Real Estate Braker? ? Yes ~ No - L'nder Ptnalties of pw~ I eatify :mc . (1) 7hc number listed on this :am is m•r mcicu Taxpsye ldendficstion h[umhQ (ar 1 atn woiring ior a numbtr io be issotd ca me) .:ND (Z) I am not subjxt ro ba 'cnep withhoi3ing bcnuse: (a)1 am escmpt from backun withtu:lcfiny or {b) l hsvs ao[ beea oadfnd by thc Ineerm) Revenuc Scrrix (7RS) 1b21I am subject m t:,elcup wit`.shctdirig u a issuit vf a Pai[ere w c=poct sll intiest or 61virlnds' a teI the IR5 tw oodfiod me dut F am oa tengc sabjea mbeclciip ' withMldiog (decs :rn app3y to cnE eseate tra^4°^"^^& maipge incnt pnid. ft xgaisirioa of ab=ndoamcsu of sc-ed pn4xxty, corua"buean te an iadiv;dual tcanmmt srtanges=t (1PA). and paymesrt: othei tbsn inttcrsc atsd dhrldmds). CFRTgTG4I'IC)IV [NS7RUCTIONS - Yw must anss out ium (Z) !bora id you hsve been noufud by the JR5 that you ste C+3mody ;ubjcsx m b=3z:p witbtwidiug becacsse or under rr:pOreng inte= ec thvioenda OD yoar tu eemra (Sx Signi4g the CerCf:cancn a, tx rsv~c of Car feca y NA.V1E (Ptinc er Type) lr' T1TL.E (Princ or TYPc) n J jigC' r^ r AUi-RORiZEDSiGNATURE a pA-M 12/26/95 PItONE(q7fl } 19R-717M DO NOT wRTTTs BELOW THLS LIIr"E AGENCY USE ONLY 'qppr°u`d By D= I099 Y [Y VEND Additicr. AecfionCoaaplemdBy Dare 395S347_5066 (I2 ICl44) ~ ~L NCIDENT REP.. T - 1997 TO 1998 1997 1998 TOV PROPElf~~~ DAMAGle $4,489/5 TOV PROPERTY DpaMAGE $84,680130 V[EHBCULAR $71,526/108 VEa-BOCULAR $65,202156 OTIr-BER PROPERTY DAMeqG(c $0/0 OTHER PROPERTY DAMAGE $414/5 PERSONAL @NJURY $1,832131 PERSONAL IN.9URY $4,010/11 WORK COM~ CLABMS $38,198136 VVORK COMP CLA9MS $369001152 Uncidents 120 Incidents 167 Total costs $1429923 Total costs 51549827 A DIFFERENCE OF = $119904 . AIV IIVCREe4SE OF = 8% state compar~ed to 1998 state Streets Bus Police Parking Facilities Administration Fire Landscape Com Dev 158,000 miles 804,800 miles 262,000 miles 23,000 miles 77,000 miles 66,000 miles 1,700 hours 25,750 miles 42,000 miles 1998 vehicular incidents = 104 1998 preventable vehicular incidents = 49 1998 non-preverttable incidents = 56 1997 vehicular incidents = 108 1997 preventable incidents = 65 1997 non-preventable incidents = 43 A difference of = 4 A difference of = 16 A difference of = 13 A decrease of = 3% A decrease of = 24% An increase of = 30% 1998 vehicular costs =$67,586 1998 preventable costs =$32,924 1998 non-preventable costs =$32,278 1997 vehicular costs =$71,526 1997 preventable costs =$35,871 1997 non-preventable costs =$38,795 A difference of =$3,940 A difference of =$2,947 A difference of =$6,517 A decrease of = 5% A decrease of = 8% A decrease of = 17% 1998 personal injuries = 11 1998 work comp claims = 54 1998 struck rock wall at Dobson = 3 1997 personal injuries = 31 1997 work comp claims = 36 1997 struck rock wall at Dobson = 6 A difFerence of = 20 A difference of = 18 A difference of = 3 . A decrease of = 64% An Increase of = 50% A decrease of = 50% 1998 personal injury costs =$4,016 1998 work comp costs =$36,001 1998 Dobson rock wall costs =$1,918 1997 personal injury costs =$1,832 1997 work comp costs =$38,198 1997 Dobson rock wrall costs =$4,247 A difference of =$2,178 A differece of =$2,197 A difference of =$2,329 An increase of = 118% A decrease of = 6% A decrease = 55% ~lsll:::'~~~ : . . . . : : . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~.:d~'...~`~~~.. ~ ~ ~ <.:::.;; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : . . . . . . . : . : . : . . . . : : : . . . . . : . . ~::;:2:S::i::i:::i y:`.:;}::.:~: .'f~~.:~.::::.:.~.~' ..~.~.;i:::::i~:i::i:'';::2:i':':::::f;':':''~~~':'':'j:.:;t::::: _t: ~:.::.>::j:.>::::.:;'r;::::;::: •:.'<:ifi.:.: . ~'k F. . . . . . . i~:::~ e ~NCIDEIVT COSTS 1996 - 1998 ~ 2 5 0000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : $ , . 1<.7 <:$:.:2 , 0 000 20 $ ~ 150 000 $ , ~~~~125 05 , "is 100 00 0 $ , .;7 :.:.1 398 , 50 000 $ , ~ 0 $ # OF INC9DENTS BY fVIOIVTH 1996-1998 30 . :::::::'::;;:::;kj';:;::;::,:':,:::::::::;:rr''S::::::";;i:?'::;;:':~'~'~`i?`i`:i>`<``~";::;::::';::;:._;;?:i.:.:'.f;.,i{~:t:;,y:::;;y~::y:':;:::;;";~:'::'::::ii'ii::::: 25 <'::2.... li«.~.'::~~::;;::::~:':::::~:':j':';;::'`;;~:::::;?.:.;,:~;,~::~ >:;:.:::.<~'~::::::::<::`:`:.:.::'::::::::::::<~:;: « 20 1 ¦ 996 15 ¦ 1997 12 01998 M10: . 10 <:::< 9 . 7 « S : »5 5 w.1: <::2 so. ?~?0 0 J J ~ r Q.Qt J 0 ,J\~ J5 `O `0 `0 `0 5~ ~ O ` TO`~~L MCIDENTS BY TYPE 1996-1998 120 < . :;«<::::<>:>:::::<:::>::::`:;::::::~:s:>'::::>:::;::>'::; 10 100 :<92: 80 ¦ 1996 60 ¦ 1997 :xx ?1 8 99 40 . . 3 >><23 . 20 >3~. ::_:.'•S i::::::;';:::. : 0 , Personal injuries 70V vehicle Private vehicle Private property TOV property VVork comp damage damage damage damage claims $180,000 COST BY 9fVC9DEIVT TYPE 1996-1998 1 ;<:':<;;::'::>:;;;.;:»?«?:<:';::::::;? $ 00 160 0 $ 140 000 $ $120 000 $1 0 00,0 0 6 ¦ 199 ¦ 199 7 $ 80'000 ? '1 8 99 $60 000 1>9:.: 3 ' <.<". 8 8<"'`?:~;> ~ . : . . . . 40 00 $ ,000 24 268 : . : . . 2 22 , 20,000 • $ . : . » $ 8 05::.~ 1 $ , . :>:;:<»>:::<>;::: ~ <:::<:::. ' 1 832 ~ 0 $ TOV property damage Personal injuries Private party damage Work comp claims ~ 1998 Q9EI9@CULAR INCIDEIVTS BY DEPARTIIAENT Fleet-2 Facilities-6 Parking-0 2% 6% 0% Landscaping-4 4°6 fffs;, ;;rrff ~%;;i•,'/~.:;: ; Police-11 1 1% r ~+I{r I Admin-1 : 196 , . Fire-4 4% • I Bus-62 Streets-14 13% # OF VEFBICULe4R II!lC6DEIVTS BY DEPARTMEfVT 1996-1998 70 : «>~3''~>::::::~::;:~:~~::;;~~:::::~>::::::::;:~<_.;<;i:«««;:::<::::::::;;>:~~;::;~:`:::~:::~:::€':;::::::::::'[<::<::~;:;:;:::<;'::::> »:~:::':~::~::::::~:~~>:~;.?:::::`:;<:::;:`:;:«`<~'>:>::::::`~?:::z«;::::<`':<~:«:':::~::::::::~::~<~~:::~:::;:~::;~:~::;:~::>;:<`<::::~•.`•.::::<~~:`::<`':`;«::<~'::::<:~«~:::::~::':::<:»'«~:~'~_':~' 60 50 <::4:•: 2 40 ¦ 1996 ¦ 1997 ?1 998 30 >:~>:.>;:.:.»::>::.::.:.::c:::;::i::i::~: s:::i::i::;:::2:::i 20 . ' ,,..1.: 0::;:<>> 10 ":'•8:::..;'` :::.:::::::<:::;::<: ~ ' ;;.:;t;~:n;:;:::.x:.;+•;»o-:»:::>:>:.;~.;;.~:.:~ :o; . . _ ...::::a: . . . ' :.:..~.:y~.~:::.. . :::':":.•..:::~f:;:::~T:::'::":it%iii:':ii;:`E';`''t:i~:<it:ji::{''•:%{;;ii .:f:i:Y':::::~::.::;;::;:::::::i:tQ:it:":~'`:i:'t::ti ,.,;t.,....::;:::::.;.: ::.:.::.i::;.:: . :i:::::::::: .2. _ ' . ~:::.::<o»: . :~:~:':::':::2:::;:2;;::::::::;~:;~ : . . ~ :><>«>::0?. p 0 Bus Streets Fire Admin Police Landscape Fleet Facilities Parking 1998 PERSON64L MlDRIES BY TYPE I ~ ~ ~ I i Struck tree on bike-1 Struck by object-2 9% I ' •,,>~18% J! %iir il,r:~i.:i:~iiYi ~;iiii:%i::i>~ •f r:i4:f/,.+f,.• ~~'l,.?i?4 .................f{f ;:;i;,;'•,9.~'•'i%i.:%~; .'f :+i:i':;•'':::~ r%;'';:t:'.'•<; ;,',,:2u/~ ii.,r••r.~:6 ~ i r~ •;%y;•;:~;if;;f;< ;%;Slip and fall-2 ::..::::w::;:3r;rij'.::r.:;:'>r,;:r.'t•i.'i;•rs.•w :::r% pp •.:,,/.,.r;i•f.'.,if:~J'" ".'r1±:~G.•;:~:f:.r{/,.rr.t•,'•/,•, 1U~O ;ry%s'y:'i+;!/:yj -r_..L':~;r:,•.Y'»'•f• :yr"~: -;;~-;r,:~. ,~~~.;-~ff%:~ttt'.l'••.':Y'~; +f•'f.~i. l''•i~~fJ:~iiA::::iv:i:i::. " ;t %j Trip and fall-1 9% - Ste 2 PPin9 from- 0 18 /o Fall from elevation-3 28% - ~ ` PREVEi~TABLE VEHICa,BLa4RS BY DEPAAsRTflAEIVT 1997-1998 40 35 i?....2.??;'?.'`'~?t'.:.???ii.~i;.ii:ii:s:ii:::i~>::i;?'si:i:<i;::~i ::::i 30 25 ¦ 1997 Preventabl e 20 ¦ 1998 Preventabl e 15 10 : .......................................::r:........ . . . ~ ~5 i:::: ..::i::»:::'.oi:}:5::r:.::i:}::.A •?}s.ss:.: . .J...:........:.,1 . iii:::::::::::::::i:::::::;;•>:;c:;:>5>:e:::::Y:::::.. ::::::::::::::>~3'::,° 5 ~ .:::"<<<``.::: ~ . : 0 : : : 0 . ~•~~~~a~o~ ~Jy G~~OO, QaG\\ ~``0 NON-PREVENTABLE VEHICULAR INC0DENTS [~Y DEPARTIVIEIVT 1997-1998 35 . . . . 30 25 20 15 10 . . . 5 ~ . »;3:<: . , . . 0 ;~o~ `~~0 ayG~Q~ eo\\~~ ~~`~e~5 , ' . , ~ ~ ~ . . < Tfl~n~pt U~s. ~o~or~P . . ' . . .'i.... . "64 .~16~ . . . . . . . , Gas tax, lottery monies. Sponsorship bad idea Would always 6e looldng for . Alternatlve acrivitles for tourlst and teens a a new s onsors & ollttcall correct s onsor. Better concert/meetln venue a/b a,b ot c Should not rel on one fundin source Would like to see a sheet of ice residents and vlsitors could skate without Civic Center a/b b schediilin . We need to have places for workers to flve but should not scariflce Vall's Communi lheater (3) a/b b recious arks and o en s aces - I don't see why thece has to be a"single" funding source. 7hLs is a loaded Conference Facill (4) a/b 6 uestton. Absolutely wfll organize and campaign against fundinng for any project which Conventton Center a/b undecided alters Gore Creek, remainin natural areas and tnountain abiance. Golfcouise b b A ubllc wte will defeat the roosals Green s ace/ en S ace (2) b b Ke Vatl risllne, natural, exclusive, eaceful G tlc (3) b b Preserve mountain atmo here Housin (2) b b The whole idea is absurd. Hub area -[1b -Dobson b b Ir-ealluestion the need for such a fadli . I.earni center b b It's time for a llttle realtionary thinktn on the aR of our tnwn. Ubrary (2) b b,a Do we reall need to grow more? Take a lesson from some of the truly great desinatlons. (Alta, St. Barts, Law densi buildin s b b/c Nantucket) Whatever use comes of this ]and, I hope the TOV dtlzens have the right to vote MuIU use ace-funcrional, chan eable (2) b b/c on It Must fit the existln arehttectural desi s in Vail b c Must res ect citlzens b c b c b c b c b c c (wk in Vail) c-former Vail res. need a113 (2) ' ~ ej Su~ a~ B~2 tea~ ; , O~~ . . : ' ' < . ' ~G ~'~SB{F~p,CC,: R~~:~• Second Ice Sheet (11) Someihin new - leamin ctr, event or adventure 7Yans ortallon (2) Vaff/Lionshead connectton (3) Whatever enerates the most activt X-stream conc t Youth / famfl fr[endl acrivlttes (3) Youth Center (3) Skate board facllities Nature walks Cafes Parks with la ound faciliries Kee as natural as ossible I.eave Gore Creek and wetlands as nature reserve Plaza - atherin s ace (2) Recreattonal Faci]itles (ice skate, bike, climbtng, swimmin ) [2) None are in the best interest of Vall Natural Beau Limited Access Wffdlife access to Gore Cneek Pedestrian streets Green arks Creekside ath Must res ect views Parkin Pedomun Arts Te EvaRua$Pons Site Use s: a) excellent b) Satisfacto c) Unsatisfacto Numbers in O indicate multi le res nses. . . < 0 no #W04" ~p ~es. r ; : . . > . I llke that they took a big bite, almost too much to cheuv, how incredible [o if we can :<>»:;:i;:::;:':;:> a(8) don't miss ud e ust b/c of "across the dver" ideas Ve Creattve Impossible to implement mana e to swallow. "Fusion of community & resort" - gieat b(4) Unique ap roach Facilittes tled to ether 5wim in Fast Vall statement 1liought it through, said what they ihought c(11) Understand Vail Ice Palace Bu n condo in Lionshead?? not what we wanted to hear. Too bl & ovenvheluiln Donovan Park rema[ned Park would like to hear more Loved approach and entry Don't seem as connected to our community, would they really understand as they work All in one place Overall view Ilbrary additlon wlth TOV? Stuff across the rlver would be farther from parking and hard to get Bmad concept, s eciflcs not coveied Aspen corrldor (4) to wlth familles/ roups Not as easil roachable Doesn't touch on "bad" past of LH, makes worse Trying to make a communi Not In Vail character The "Bi " thinkl ihis pro'ect needs VerV poor - remwal of lo in unacceptable Intensi of hub Too randiose Too fan kee it simple visionary Attenllon to creek (2) Overwhelmin Keep top of structuce for transportaUon Plans should not remove limited green space Ignored need for conference space nor should they require condemnatton of Weakest roposal Grandness of the idea completel private properties. guestion the need of many of the proposed facilittes when local retail, restaurants are Poor (2) Connectlon to rlver Imax - ddiculous use • struggling. Great Sense of arrival Too much like a ci Use eve reens instead of aspens in corrldor Condemnatron wlll create higher cost and - delays: trying to take homes away from long time second owners & locals will create divisiveness, hostllity instead of community Too concentrated In one lace Town Centers Probabl impossible solutlon harmon . "lhe Green Team's concepts are very L.A. tn nature, essentlally creation of a glltzy inner Doesn't appear to connect to existing city env[ronment In llonshead, ignoring other Stupid reliance on condemnatlon Creek as focal point facllitles as well as the others. parts of town. If this team says skler visits are Ilat now - they will assure this trend with more development. Young Very hard to conceptuallze - could 19ie team's heary reliance on condemnatlon of fanulies will not come to Vall to stay. Vail will have used more vlsual - 3 residential private pmperiy for reallzaUon of become another Estes Park caterin to T-Shirts. Flnancials seem well thou t out dimensional or model their plans seems unwlse. rlght to condemn the properties in question, ihe cost in dollazs and ID-will among the Development of wellands south side owners of those propertles is llkety to be very Ok Solves problems of Gore Cieek hi . There is nothing remotely related to mountain Love the arrival experience 1-70 screen Gets into weflands In Lionshead livin . i ~ : ' ' ~ ~:'::;:::::"';;i:;::> . . ~`i ~y. +WQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~~i$' ; ' To those of us who have been here since 1967 No Integratlon of faclliries with or before the center of Vail ls and wlll be Bridge ~ B er & better pobson natural envfronment St. ~ '19ie'Town'[heatre" could be any Everything metro olis or suburban sho in 'a. Nane Nothin Guest in need of the roosed facWtles Tco urban Poor use of green space/wetlands which should be reserved Too much retail Presentatlon Too modern - too Ve as Pedestrlan/ green Arrival e edence is reat ; ~apt t~ ~tert: Tmalrtqa~ e~':~rmaeuk~' ~~;~~:((k~¢Il;: Phase approach -Kept hub site for guest & hdght, does it fit the rest of Vail's Seaned to understand the Lionshead a(8) Well done comm, amhitecture Maste lan & communi hansparent/glass open areas, mtn mmodel of Dobson, 6uild aver not Too much emphasls, on what decLsion makers b(2) don't like idea of readin out trademazk in laza destrohistodcal dest wanted to hear and able to be done in pleces if c(6) Network of fadliries and ideas for relacement More assive as ou move out from hub necessary Good mix of eo le Rrst choice Connecllon to natural environment Ice Idea - hrrr Understand all the co Ieldttes / flexlbW Goal to have Design 9Jkshp on team, Cuttfn off Dobson roof and reroofln Glass eak roofs knowled e of Lionshead Master Plan Doesn't touch on 'bad" LH ast, makes worse Better walkwa from Idonshead to Library Doesn't allaw for future expansion talk to. Good use of existin bld s [ce Plaza and all the windows Not co rehensive Use of exisUn bld s unremarkable, expected Multi u ose area Too much chrome/ lass Phased iniplementation wd Conc t shows Coo much develo ment on arks G stlc area close to arkl dest Too fankee it s le Appears to be well suitecl into the existlng Drawings not conducive to Vail, structures Ties into environmental hub conc t reresentatlve of another area Keep to of structure for tran ortatlon are not as compaUble with the residential structures across the Ve ood Modify Dobson for other uses street. No uni ueness to Vail Converting Dohson wlll result in • pdmary use other than skatlng Too much development - needs to be more Poor FleAdble s ace I.e. outh ctr factli . This is a serfous flaw in the discrlminattn Great Golf Club, multl use Overvtew a ears "D1sne like". (2) Views are greatly Would not stand the test of tlme - Creattve use of etdstln facllittes Plaza ve much a theme ark look. Seems to be the most creatlve Spreading facilittes around town and creattng them vrith pazks and recrearional paths revitalizes whole Thazilc you for 8nding ways to use Dobson the whole communi Tiers Desi n of architecture Arena and not taktn wa our residences! Phasing development with stand alone phasing Is smart, economical and allows for future flexdbllity needs chanes Climhin wall Gets into weUands Poor use of s ace above azkin center. Design should be more classical, tiadlllonal Allows for more divetsi of fundin sources Abili to hase in Nothin and lastin . 'Ihe Colonnade is cold, obtrusive and . could be easily situated in Manhattan or Chicago - Don't people guestlon need for meetlng rooms as already 7he "[ce Palace" is an abberallon. Dlfllcul followln lan come to Vail to esca e the c[ ! su lied b local hotels. Very much agalnst using Dobson for more Who needs a cllmbing wall.in the mountains when concerts & other venues - we need two sheets one can do the same at an REI store in Denver. SiUn / hasabill Too man brid es across Gore Creek of ice for hock & flgure skatin now. Grand Promenade is too mechazilcal A model of each would have been much easier Better of the three if lt must be ood architecture - SAFE and Disn sh f6r the non-architect, non- lanner. Heard seveial people commentlng on lack of Too masstve Conce t of the entire Town bein used ' conc ts from all teatns. Best concept of linldng facUttles, acllvltles to Please keep the theme of Vail in mind, do not, Dtrected more toward community & T'OV nature & creating places where locaLs and destro what we have, residents visitors can intermin e .3le a,. ! ; : ttther€bmmeatsi , : ~ ast Ca~ae s . ~93s~ka. Ttils is suPPosed to be a 4ualnt ~:T~:~pQE98:; Ice palace is imaginatlve integcarion of Bavarlan fillage..,that is what ' `'indoots and out attracts est to Vail. Uked iheir approach and ideas. Creates informal gathering places for sociai Seemed to understand Vail and its future activitles & im romteau meetin s needs. Spreadtng new publlc faciliries throughout the valley and using eidstlng facillries as the basis Ada llve reuse for new ones seems like the d t wa to o. The modular approach to planning,m with each new or upgraded factlity being independent of others, seems like a prdgmaric Nothin and workable a roach. Evexydiing Wouid like to see this #eam chosen. Limitcd What are ou think( . add to our ariractlon? NOTHING ~tce~Oe~' ' I ~a ptt ~f~?~ a~ ~ a~~t e~e ~t~s ke~ ~e~ . : ~~r~e~ KaYak river ieminded of Pool comPlex that was wted down. Morethan a(4) Don't like readi stuff all around Connects llonshead/Vail what the communi asked for. Seemed more uest than communi oriented 'People lwe to come to share there is a sense of community" very good quote, very wlse to Llke the Adventure Center on South side of LH - keep "next generatlon" in mind, something this b(6) arldn structure fleadble "2nd ice" area, outslde oes In make a dense corridor more dense valle has to otten Racquet club would be good upgrade but would Residenttal always ends up in c(6) eo le use it? "next eneratlon" osiUve hrase conllict wlth ubllc uses I.e. Red Iion Fire statlon at'[bwn sho ResidenUal needs separate locatton Push out si e homeowners? I don't thlnk so. X-stream adventure center or co onent on ed e. Out of box thlnki , flexlblli Liked Ilnkin everything to ether Combination oC nature and culture B n Iaonshead I.od e, etc. Cood ra ort between team members good Connection to Dobson Very 70's in style Listen and understand wmmunity ood - future minded Conventlon center where Subwa is located Bo arc:hitecture Ve o anized/concise/well lanned resent Concept: ok as long as existlng neighbois welcome the constructlon Tram/walkwa 1Ye the across the creek area in better Thou t more about the cash and feaslbili Housing, if not a Mtn. Bell site should be What ha ened to eadstln residential units? I1 tln Removal of s/f homes uestlonable mainl em 1 ee "homogenous" architecture - strip creates excellent tlow and connection Architectural oints o( reference mall meets Vall Mon Phase I ok Phase Il bad en at structures Too much llke Beaver Creek Too keep tt s le Integratlon of [lonshead/Vail to form core Top of LH structure should be for Excellent tram/pedestrtan connection No housing here transportarion Adventure architectural design & matedals This team is on the rlght track, but don't want Ok to enhance chaiacter No deflnlUon of Vail to look like Dallas (chrome/ ass) Great Multr use facilittes / Too much chrome/ lass B far the stron est conc t. Do we realiy want a tram In Vail for Too concentrated in one lace Conference s aces such short distances? Best use of s ace Same stupid reliance on condemnaUon as Green Team Housin on arkin structure Do not take awa resldentlal units. Excellent flow and inte rallon. To ruln the last naturai prlsttne aiea of Gore Creek 9uesllon the need for duplicatlon of civic w(th a kayak course and natural trall is rldiculous. center and meeting rooms already prov[ded by We alread have this at Ford Park Good master lannin Phase II locai hotels. Kayak river reminded of pool compiex that was wted down. More than Too massive Housin In Town what the communi asked for. E ensive and seasonal Seens llke there is a better use than Re ect for arks Ita akln Vatl alread too crowded Quesllon the need for additlonal hotels, retail, pretty Ictures Access to Lod e at Lionshead restaurants when man In town are struggling. Phase II requims condemnatlon of private Meets the 1 est number of oals. Nothin " property I strongly o ose. Traditlonal/lastln Too urban, e ectall the traln Questlon hotel where condos are. Too much big new butlding without No one wlll really use it. People can Itayak or the tram - streetcaz conc t(2) use of existln facllittes walk thru the meadow as it is now. ; ; ~onuC~~~s ' > .v~ep~~ee~'::::.: . . . ; ;:~a Co.' ; 'i 8~~ ;:..."WLst ;HatiPtlid:> :sa:#eel;a'b~ fke:~~ : ~ ;s_. . : , Large civic center is too insiltutlonal, Condemnatlon wlll create hi8her cost, delaYs; Provldes no inteBratlon with natural trying to take awaY homes from long ttme Pmmenade envlivnment second homeownecs &'locals No infonrial areas where locals and Will create divisiveness& hosUlity tnstead of Everything vtsitors can intermin e communi hamio ~ The Grand Promenade looks exacly The plans weren't as heavlly centered around like D[sneyland. Will the Golden Bear llonshead as the Green Team's but thought sell "stuffed animals - Golden Bears" the emphasis was stlll too heavy amund Civlc Center and rest of Phase I ? Llonshead. Think the wndemnatlon oC property is a bad None Too much, ass, Holl oai idea. Kayak course another alternatlve for skters 7'ram made flttle sense, don't see how it would and locals rovided wst is k t down. ~ be better than the exlsrin bus service. Please do not take away the family homes on West Meadow Ddve - ihese are true old tlmers Wothin - what ha ened to our Swiss Vill e of Vail. , , .ee i ' ' Ot]?~r:~onmm~is......... Shouldn'[ think in terms of massive structures but ones that flt the to h and e ra h Need to build on our existtng vlllage (tyrolean) crearivel and crome u with u ue desi s. Vail needs to be deftned by its citlzens and this should be communicated to the architects All of these proposaLs - the whole concept is self defeating. Tourlsts want natural mountain beauTy and sports - Residents want sports - real spoits - not conMved real ieock climbin , ka aldn etc. Don't we almady have enough of this available in Ford Patic? Do we really need to attract more people than are now visitln tn summer or wlntef.~ How about an emphasis on qualtry not quantity. T-Shirt shops are already in over su l Let's stop new constructlon for at least some edod to et a grip. ; dttusirA;aumr Iiked the consultant who said to be who we are - hoPe we concenttate on our successes as i:;>:;z!:;:;::»:>S>:«:<;::!:::inthe ast. 1999 World Championship extra coverage DATE: SHIFT ROUTE PdAME ~ HOURS j# buses i • , ' Intown lan Brown ~ 8 1 3- i 11 P Saturday 3•11p ' Intown 8 2 ! 3-11p Intown 8 3 3-11p ~ lntown ~ 8 4 ~ 8 5 3-11p lntown 3-1 ip Fordpark ~ 8 6 ~ 3-11p Fordpark B 7 I j 56 4 5:30A-1:30P ~ Intown I 8 1 Monday 5:30A-1:30P lntown 8 2 ' 5:30A•1:30P Intown , 8 3 i 5:30A-1:30P i lntown B 4 i ' 5:30A-1:30P Floater i I 8 5 ~ I 5:30A-1:30P ~ Floater ! 8 ~ 6 5:30A-1:30P Donovan I 8 7 ~ 1:15p-6:15p I Intown I 5 ' 1:15p-6:15p I lntown I 5 1:15p-6:15p I lntown I 1. 5 I i 1:15p•6:15p I lntown I 5 , ~ 1:15p-6:15p ; Floater ~ 5 I i 1:15p-6:15p Floater ; 5 ~ i ~ 1:15p-6:15p i Donovan ~ 5 91 I i ~~pt~ky ~tf49$ -a5:45a-3A5p/wv/int j For Ernie Sr 10 1 I 5:30A-3:30P Dally IErnie Sr Tuesday Uti115:30a-3:30p j ForCindy 10 2 5:30A-3,30P Dally ndy , 7a 5:55a-3:55p ev I For Jim 10 3 5:30A-3,30P ~ Dally ,Jim Util 2 9:00a-7:00p I For Craig I ~ 10 4 ! 5:30A•3:30P Dally ;Craig i#8a 1:30p•9:30p wv j For Cincy 8 5 '5:30A•3:30P ' Dally iCincinnati #7c 1:00p-9:00p ev + For John E i ~ 8 6 5:30a•? Dally 'John ~#3 5:30a-3:30p wviint ~ For Ernie II 10 7 , 5:30a-? Dally IErnie II ~ 1:15p•9:15p Inrown S 8 i ; j 1:15p-9:15p lntown I 8 9 I i , 1:15p•9:15p Intown ; 8 10 I 1:15p•9:15p I lntown 8 11 i 1:15p-9:15p Floater I a 12 1:15p-9:15p Floater ~ 8 13 1:15p-9:15p Donovan I 8 14 I 9:00p-midnight , Intown 3 9:00p-midnfght Intown I 3 128 Pagei 1999 1999 World Championship exua coverage . reb#KI;9~::::;:;<:; 5:30A-1:30P lntown 8 1 I : . : : : . . ~ . : : : . . r:.....:.::........::...... Friday 5:30A-1:30P lntown 6 2 ~ 5:30A-1:30P lntown 8 3 I 5:30A•1:30P intown 8 4 I 5:30A-1:30P Floater 8 5 ~ 5:30A-1:30P Floater ~ 8 6 I 5:30A-1:30P Donovan ~ 8 ~ 7 ~ 1:15p-9:15p Intown ~ B '1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 ~ 1:15p•9:15p lntown 8 ~ 1:15p-9:15p {ntown 1 8 ~ 1:15p-9:15p Floater g ~ ~ 1:15p-9:15p Floater ! $ 1:15p-9:15p Donovan 8 ~ 112 _ ; ~e~etagr~~h;~~99 #7c 1:00p-9:00p ev For Hal L _ 8 1 ~ 5;30A•3:30P i Dally iJohn E Saturday I ! 2 5:30A•3:30P I Dally 'Jim C ~ 3 5:30A-3:30P Da{ly Cindy 4 5:30A•3:30P Dally 'Ernie II , I I 5 5:30A•3:30P Dally iErnie Sr 6 5:30a-? I Dally .Hal L I I I 7 5:30a•? Dally iCincinnati 1:15p-9:15p lntown j 8 ~ 6 ~ i 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 9 1:15p-9:15p lntown i 8 I 10 I I 1:15p-9:15p (ntown I ~ 8 I 11 1:15p•9:15p Floater lan Brown ~ 8 12 ~ 1:15p-9:15p Fioater ~ 8 13 I i, 1:15p-9:15p Donovan S ! 14 i ; 64 ' I ~ebtltaty?4h,1"~99 5:30A•1:30P Intown I 8 Sunday ~ 5:30A•1:30P Inrown i 8 2 ~ 5:30A-1:30P Intown 8 ~ 3 i ~ 5:30A-1:30P lntown 8 I 4 5:30A-1:30P Floater I 8 ~ 5 , 5:30A•1:30P Floater I 1 8 6 ~ I 5:30A-1:30P Donovan ! 8 I 7 1:15p11:15p lntown ! 10 1:15p11:15p Inrown I 10 I 1:15p11:15p lntown 10 ~ 1:15p11:15p Intown 10 ! 1:15p11:15p Floater lan Brown I 10 i 1:15p11:15p Floater ~ 10 ~ 1:15p11:15p Donovan 10 126 ! Page 2 1999 1999 Worid Championship extra coverage ua '#7c1:00 •9:00 ev ForJohnE 8 1 5:30A-3:30P Dally IJohnE ,..,:::..r..:::.::'.; P Monday 7a 5:55a-3:55p ev For Jim 10 2 5:30A- 3:30P Dally !Jim ~ Util 1 5:30a•3:30p For Cindy 10 3 5:30A• 3:30P Daliy iCindy #3 5:30a-3:30p wvAnt For Ernie II 10 4 5:30A• 3:30P Dally Ernie II ` Util 2 9:00a-7:00p For Craig W 10 5 j 5:30A- 3:30P Dally ! Craig #8a 130p-9:30p wv For Cincinnati 8 6 5:30a-? Dally iCincinnati 7 ~ 5:30a•? Dally ; Ernie Sr 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 g j I 1;15p-9:15p Intown 8 I 9 ' 1:15p-9:15p Intown I I 8 10 ! 1:15p-9:15p {ntown 8 11 1:15p•9:15p Floater I 8 I 12 1:15p-9:15p Floater 8 I 13 I 1:15p-9:15p Donovan 8 i 14 ! 112 _ ~Bb~UaT~9~h,1~9~ 5:30A-1:30P i Inrown I S 1 I Tuesday 5:30A-1:30P I Intown , 8 ~ 2 5:30A-1:30P lntown 8 ~ 3 5:30A•1:30P Intown ( 8 4 ~ I 5:30A-1:30P Floater 8 ! 5 I 5:30A-1:30P Floater j 8 i 6 I 5:30A-1:34P Donovan 1 8 7 1:15p•9:15p Intown B 1 ~ 1:15p•9:15p I Intown ~ I 1:15p-9:15p I Inrown ~ 8 1:15p-9:15p I Intawn , 6 I I 1:15p-9:15p Floater 8 1:15p-9:15p Ffoater ~ 8 I ~ 1:15p-9:15p Donovan 1 6 i ~ ~ 112 ! 1:30p-9:30p i Inrown ~ 8 ~ 1 Wednesday 1:30p-9:30p i Intown 8 I 2 , I 1:30p-9:30p Intown 8 1 3 1 1:30p-9:30p I. Intown a 4 I ~ j 32 ; . 1r,bCU&Cy~`1xk1,199~ 5:30A-1:30P i Intown a I 1 I Thursday 5:30A-1;30P I Intown ' 8 2 ~ ' 8 3 5;30A-1:30P Intown 5:30A-1:30P Intown 8 4 5:30A-1:30P Floater 8 ~5 I ~ 5:30A-1:30P Floater 8 6 5:30A-1:30P Donovan 8 7 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 1:15p-9:15p Intown B 1:15p-9:15p Intown B 1:15 -9:15 Floater 8 Page 3 1999 1999 World Championship extra coverage 1:15p-9:15p Floater I 6 I I 1:15p-9:151:i, Donovan ~ g I I 112 I j I Page 4 1999 1999 Wor1d Championship extra coverage 5:30A-1:30P Intown B I 1 : • Friday. 5:30A-1:30P Intown 8 2 5:30A-1:30P Intown B ~ 3 ~ I ~ 5:30A-1:30P Intown 8 i 4 5:30A•1:30P Floater B 5 5:30A-1:30P Floater 8 6 5:36A-1:30P Donovan B I 7 i. 1:15p-9:15p Intown I B 1:15p-9:15p Intown I B ~ 1:15p•9:15p Intown ~ 8 I 1:15p-9:15p Intown ! 8 1:15p-9:15p Floater ~ 8 i 1:15p-9:15p Floater ~ 8 i I ~ 1:15p-9:15p Donovan 8 112 ~ 5:30A-1:30P Intown ' 8 I 1 SaturdaY 5:30A-1:30P Intown I 8 2 I I } 5:30A-1:30P Intown ? 8 I 3 I I 5:30A-1:30P Intown 'i 8 ~ 4 5:30A-1:30P Fioater ~ 8 I 5 ~ 5:30A-1:30P Floater 8 6 j 5:30A-1:30P Donovan 8 7 I 1:15p-11:15p Inrown ; 10 I 1:15p-11:15p Intown 10 ! 1:15p-11:15p Intown 10 I 1 I 1:15p-11:15p Intown 10 1:15p-11:15p Floater I 10 i 1:15p-11:15p Floater ~ 10 ~ 1:15p-11:15p Donovan j 10 I , 126 ~ I I 5:30A•1:30P Intown i B 1 . ~ Sunday I 5:30A•1:30P ~ Intown ! 8 I 2 5:30A•1:30P Intown ; 8 3 ~ 5:30A•1:30P Intown 8 4 530A•1:30P FVoater 8 ! 5 ~ 5:30A-1:30P Floater ~ I 8 i 6 5:30A-1:30P Donovan 8 i 7 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 1:15p-9:15p Intown 8 ~ 1:1,5p-9:15p Floater I 8 ~ 1:15p-9:15p Floater 8 1:15p-9:15p Donovan 8 112 Page 5 1999