HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-03-19 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session
• !/A1L TO!!VN"COUNCIL
E\/ENING MEETING
7lYESDAY, NIARCFi 19, 1996
I:30 P.M. 9N TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FtEVISED AGENDA
1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
2. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of February 6, 1996.
B. Ordinance IVo. 4, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance amending
Chapter 18.18, Section 18.18.090 Density Control, Medium-Density Family (MDMF)
District of the Vail Municipal Code.
C. Ordinance IVo. 6, Series of 1996, second reading of First Amendment to the Town
of Vail Employees' Pension Plan
3. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996, first reading of an Ordinance Amending Title 16 (Sign
Code) and Title 18, Chapter 18.54 (Design Review Guidelines) of the Vail Municipal Code.
4. Ordinance IVo. 10, Series of 1996, first.reading of an ordinance amending Section 2.24.020,
Members-Appointments-Terms of the Planning and Environmental Commission; Section
2.26.020 Arts Board-Appointment; Section 2.26.030 Members-Appointments-Terms of
Town of Vail Arts Board; and Section 18.54.020(b) Board Organization.
5. Ordinance IVo. 8, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting
Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1994, to all for the construction of a Type III Employee Housing
Unit in the Cornice Building; to amend the development plans for Special Development
District IVo. 32 in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code; and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
6. Request to Amend Golden Peak Operational Management Plan.
7. Discussion Regarding Employee Housing Unit 56 at Innsbrook Meadows Subdivision.
8. Town Manager's Report.
9. Adjournment. .
NOTE UPCOIVIING MEETING STARY 1'IMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
I I I I I I I
7HE NE1CT VAIL T0WN COUNCIL REGULAR V!/ORK SESSION
: WILL BE ON TUESD,4Y, 3/26/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IIV TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOUi/ING VAIL TOViIN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
llillLL BE ON 7UESDAY, 4/2/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUIVCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NIEXT VAIL 1'OVVM COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETIfVG
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/2196, BEGIYVNIIVG AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or
479-2356 TDD for information. -
C'\AGENDA.TC
5
!
a
.i
NA8L TOWN C,OlDNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TtJESD,4Y, MARCH 19, 1996
7:30 P.M. 9N TOV COUNC9L CHIAMBERS REdISED EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
7:35 P.M. 2. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of February 6, 1996.
B. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance
amending Chapter 18.18, Section 18.18.090 Density Control,
Medium-Density Family (MDMF) District of the Vail Municipal Code.
C. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1996, second reading of First Amendment
to the Town of Vail Employees' Pension Plan.
7:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996, first reading of an Ordinance Amending
Randy Stouder Titie 16 (Sign Code) and Title 18, Chapter 18.54 (Design Review Guidelines)
of the Vail Municipal Code.
ACTIOiV REQUESTED OF COUIVCIL: Approve Ordinance No. 9, Series of
1996, on first reading. .
BACKGROUlVD INFORMATION: A Technical Advisory Committee was
formed to guide staff in the formulation of amendments to the Sign Code
and Design Review Guidelines that will expedite the development review
process for items of minimal complexity. The proposed amendments have
been reviewed by the DRB and the PEC, and embody the recommendations
of Staff, the TAC, the DRB and the PEG. The PEC unanimously (7-0)
recommended that the Town Council approve Ordinance No. 9 at their
meeting on March 11, 1996.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval-of Ordinance No.
9, Series of 1996 on first reading.
8:25 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1996, first reading of an ordinance amending
Pam Brandmeyer Section 2.24.020, Members-Appointments-Terms of the Planning and
Kathy Langenwalter Environmental Commission; Section 2.26.020 Arts Board-Appointment;
Section 2.26.030 Members-Appointments-Terms of Town of Vail Arts Board;
and Section 18.54.020(b) Board Organization.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, modify, or deny Ordinance
No. 10, Series of 1996, on first reading.
BACKGROUIVD lNFORMATION: At the time of the recent board
appointments it became apparent that it was in the best interests of the
organization to have a consistent date of termination for the Pfanning and
Environmental Commission, the Design Review Board, and the Arts Board.
It is believed that the date of Nlay the 1 st, being between the seasons, offers
the best time for transition of inembers.
The Arts Board is interested in increasing its membership due to the amount
of interest in the community to participate and an increased membership will ease 4he obligation of inembers to attend all meetings. The Arts Board will
be meeting on Monday, IVlarch 18, 1996 to confirm the suggested number
of eleven members. The addition of the Design Review Board member is
consistent with what has been occurring in practice.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIOIV: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No.
90, Series of 1996 on first reading.
'
~
8:40 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 8,. Series of 1996, second reading of an ordinance repealing
George Ruther and reenacting Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1994, to all for the construction
Tom Braun of a Type III Employee Housing Unit in the Cornice Building; to amend the
development plans for Special Development District No. 32 in accordance
with Chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code; antl setting forth .
details in regard thereto.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No.
8, Series of 1996 on second reading.
BACKGROUND: On February 12, 1996, Tom Braun, representing the
property owner David Smith, appeared before the Planning and
Environmental Commission with a request for a Major Amendment to
Special Development District (SDD) No. 32, to allow for the construction of
an employee housing unit, located at the Cornice Building, 362 Vail Valley
. Drive/part of Tract B, Vail Village 1st Filing. In addition to the proposal to
construct an employee housing unit in the Cornice.Building, the applicant
also proposed a change to the approved development plan with regard to the outdoor lighting requirements. The applicant was seeking greater
flexibility in the outdoor lighting requirement than is currently allowed by
Chapter 18.54, Design Review, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Upon review of the Major SDD Amendment request, in accordance with
Section 18.40.100 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Planning and
Environmental Commission approved a motion to recommend approval of
the Major SDD Amendment request to the Town Council. The Planning and
Environmental Commission recommended approval with the following
conditions:
1. That the proposed employee housing unit, within the Cornice
Building, not be eligible for sale separately from the single-family
dwelling unit. -
2. That any previous approvals for outdoor lighting on the property be
voided by this approval.
3. That the internal access door between the existing garage and the
proposed employee housing unit be eliminated. -
The motion to recommend approval of the Major SDD Amendment request •
passed 3-1-1 (Bowen dissented, Amsden abstained).
A copy of the memorandum prepared for the Planning and Environmental
Commission, dated February 12, 1996, has been attached for reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the memorandum
prepared by staff for the Planning and Environmental Commission (2/12/96),
the Community Development Department recommends approval of the
proposed Major Amendment to Special Development District No. 32, the
Cornice Building. `
8:55 P.M. 6. Request to Amend Golden Peak Operational Management Plan.
Bob McLaurin Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.
Tom Moorhead _
Jim Curnutte ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or deny amendment to the
Golden Peak Operational Management Plan.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Town Council has been asked to consider a
request by Vail Associates, Inc., the applicant, to amend the Golden Peak
Operational Management Plan. This request is to allow the 150 parking
spaces, in the parking structure to be offered as first tier parking
memberships. This would be an increase from the presently permitted 75
parking memberships provided in Section II. Managed Parking Structure as
approved in the development plan.
. _ ,
.
-
~
This request does not include a modification to buiiding plans, site or
landscape plan or any proposal to change uses; increase gross residentiaf
floor area; change the number of dwelling or accommodation units. The
request does involve the operation of the managed parking structure.
9:55 P.M. 7. Discussion Regarding Employee Housing Unit'56 at Innsbrook Meadows
Tom Moorhead Subdivision.
Andy Knudtsen
10:40 P.M. 8. Town Manager's Report.
10:45 P.M. 9. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEET9NG STA?FtT TIflAES BELOW:
(ALL T1MES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SllBJECT TO CHANGE)
T'HE NEXI' VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAa2 lflIORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/26/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLL.OliM/1NG VAIL Tf3NilN COUNCiL 62EGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 412196, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN 70V COUNCIL CHAnABERS.
THE WEXT VAIL T01)NN COURlCIL RECUL,4R EVENING flAEETING
lAIILL BE ON TUESDAY, 412/96, BEGINNING A7 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUfVCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
Sign fanguage interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please ca11479-2114 voice or
479-2356 TDD for information.
C:WGENDA.TCE
News ReBeaseo Foo° B~~edaate ReBease
Marc h 13, 1996
Con8act: IVancy Sweeney
Art In Public Places Coordinator
970/479-7990
Town 04 VaiB Temporarv Art Exhsbition Program
The Town of Vail Art in Public Places.Board is seeking applications Yor the
Temporary Art Exhibition Program. At present, fourteen exterior sites are
available within Vail Village and Lionshead for the temporary display of artwork.
Each site was carefully selected for its visibility and access to both visitors and
residents of the Vail Valley. This Art in Public Places program is in collaboration
with the Vail Valley Gallery Association and the Vail Valley Arts Council. It is
designed to enrich the community and provide exposure to artists working
within the public realm.
Vail is a high profile international resort committed to excellence. The selected
artwork will exemplify this same commitment to quality and innovation. The
Temporary Exhibition Program was designed to create a mutually beneficial
partnership betvveen the Town of Vail and artists working both within and
outside of the community.
Applications are due by 5:00 PM on April 19th, 1996. There is a$20 application
fee to help pay for costs associated with reviewing the proposals and
determining placement. Selected artists uvill enter into a standard lease
agreement with the Town of Vail for each piece of a?tvvork proposed for a site.
The length of the lease will be approximately six months with the option to
renew. A two percent sales commission will be collected for any arnrvork sold.
Instaliation of the artvvork will take place June 1-16, 1996. Applications are
avaifable at the Town Clerks Office in the Town of Vail Niunicipal Building, 75
South Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657. For more information contact Brent Alm
at 827-9650 or IVancy Sweeney at 479-7990.
r
CisYOlY SLLaleOC0eG06
SeEbeG$ CEPCIe
Seibert Circle is located in the center of Vail Vllage. It is positioned at the base of the mountain
and serves as the transition from recreational wildemess to urban hub. This center is a
thoroughfare for pedestrian traffic, as well as, a popular gathering place. Regardless of the
season, Seibert Circle is accessibie and well maintained. Both visitors and residents are invited to
sft, have lunch, read the newspaper, or simply enjoy the outdoors. Several of Vail's quality retail
stores and restaurants encircle this site creating an intimate neighborhood feel.
The selected artistic concept will lead the design of Seibert Circle. Representing the Town's
commitment to excellence and innovation, the area will be identified as a significant landmark. By
selecting a professional artist, the town will be able to build community support and increase
visibility within other communities as well. As an international, cosmopolitan resort, it is necessary
for the artwork to reflect a commitment to quality and distinction.
The four seasons dramatically affect the amount of light Seibert Circle receives. During the
summer months, when the sun is high, the area is filled with intense sunlight for the majority of the
day. In the winter, however, the sun does not illuminate the area until approximately 10:00 a.m.
and it is in shadow after 4:00 p.m.. The position of the sun has a tremendous influence on the
general mood and appeal of the area.
Similarly, the artwork will be responsible for creating a certain ambiance. Due to the nature of the
location and the multiple functions it serves, the atmosphere is extremely lively,and energetic. It is
important that the artwork possess this same vitality. The artwork will be an extension of the
congenial, vivacious nature of the Town of Vail. Whether the piece includes a water feature, or
moves with the wind, it is essential that it be engaging.
In order to accommodate pedestrian activity, Seibert Circle will incorporate seating, and street
lights, as integral elements in the design. Some heating element may also be included in the
. master plan. The surrounding corridor must provide access for delivery vehicles and the fire
department. Therefore, it is necessary to remain within the boundries outlined for artwork and
landscaping.
Seibert Circle
Selection Criteria
1. Qualitv and innovation
The consideration of highest priority is the inherent artistic excellence and innovation of the
artwork. The intention is to create a signature piece for the Town of Vail.
2. Timelessness
The artwork should be viewed as a long-term acquisition that should have relevance aesthetically
to the community in future years. Due to the high visibility by residents and guests who frequent
Seibert Circle, the piece should reflect enduring artistic quality. -
3. Approachable
Seibert Circle is both visually and physically a town center. The area functions as a meeting place,
gathering spot, and thoroughfare. Therefore, the artwork should be inviting, interactive and
approachable.
4. Permanence
The work of art shall have structural and surtace soundness and be resistant to theft, vandalism,
and weathering. The piece must be durable enough to withstand hanging, swinging, jumping, or
general carousing. The artwork shall not require excessive maintenance or repair cost. Any
artwork that requires expensive and/or continual maintenance is discouraged.
5. Public Safetv
The artwork shall not create inordinate safety problems or liability problems for the general public or
Town of Vail.
6. Non-Obstructive
The artwork must not obstruct street level views. There is no specific height restriction, however,
the piece must not visually hinder access to stQrefront windows.
7. Inteqrated Desipn
The artist will be working in collaboration with the Town of Vail and the selected Landscape
Architeci to create a master plan addressing the entire area. The lay out should integrate lighting
and seating as un'rfied elements.
8. Communitv Involvement
The artist wiH work in collaboration with the AIPP board to develop a process of community
participation which fosters a feeling of investment in and ownership of the artwork.
9. Site Appropriateness
The artwork should be compatible with the surrounding area and should form an overall relationship
with the site. The actual site for artwork includes an area approximately 30 feet in diameter. This
space may be asymmetrical or undetined, however, it must provide a 22 foot set-back from each
surrounding building in order to accommodate the Fire Department.
10. Climatic Consideration
Seibert Circle receives extreme weather conditions which dramatically impact the surroundings.
The intense temperature variations and large amount of moisture from snow, ice, and run-off,
create profotmd expansion and contraction. The site conditions range from heavily shaded to full
sun exposure depending on the seasonal and daily conditions. All of the materials used will be appropriate for the specific climatic conditions, i.e.. pavement, etc..
11. Maintenance
The level of maintenance will be documented in advance with a recommendation regarding
frequency. The work should not require excessive or continual care. Depending on the identified
method of snow removal, machine operated snow plows require approximately 13 feet.
(,U S 3 • l ~i • 4l~ ~..l~f-`~u- ~
PROPOSED
VAIL VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
(VVCWD) - TOWN OF VAIL PARTNERSHIP
FOR LOCALS HOUSING
RED SANDSTONE ROAD
OUTLINE OF THE PROPOSAL
1. 12 -20 units for sale or rent (to be determined).
2. WCWD and TOV each will control number of units equal to percentage
of land each puts into the project.
3. WCWD will be the developer.
4. TOV participation is dependent upon completion of LOA transfer of parcel from
USFS to TOV.
5. TOV will initiate a rezoning of the USFS properiy. WCWD will initiate
rezoning of its property.
6. The project may include free market units, up to 25% of the total number of units.
7. The two partners will jointly convey the land to a hoineowners association.
8. Construcrion financing will be on a pro rata basis.
9. Deed restrictions on the units will be the same as on the Vail Commons units (if
owner occupied) or other TOV EHLT restrictions for renters, with the addition of a
right of first refusal for each of the partners to purchase its share of resale units.
QUESTIONS:
A. How will the profit from the sale of any free market units bc
(a) divided and (b) applied?
, ~
GI~~S ~ c t 4 (o ~r,ru, ~ ~
Lottery applications
avaifab(e VAIL COMMONS LOTTERY PROCESS
Friday, March 29 MARCH 19, 1996
Participants secure
prequa(ifi-cation and
com lete latte a Construction
anticipated to begin
by mid to late April
Application Deadline
Thursday, April 25
Report to Council ,
May 7, 1996
VerificaCion by TOV
Drawing to be held
May 20, 1996
Selection of Units
Contrac# executed
by each lottery
winner by May 31
FNMA approval
anticipated
Individual loan
commitments
secured
Aa- ~W
Cert. of Occupancy
issued between
9-96 and 1-97
Ctosings '
Occupancy
e'
ME11h[ORA1VDU11R
TO: T'own Council
F1tOlVt: Randy Stouder, Town Planner
Susan Connelly, Cornmunity I)evelopment Director
RE: Proposed I)esign Review Process and Sigri Code Modifications
DATE: 1Vlarch 19, 1996
_ In response to the 1995 Community Survey results which indicated grustra4ion with the
existing Design pteview guidelines and process and to the Community Development Department's
need to "do more with less", staff has spent 4he last several months reviewing Tovvvn codes and
identifying areas for procedural improvemeat. iR/e seek to achieve two goals: (1) to improve
customer satisfaction asid (2) to improve staff efficieacy and, thus, availabiliry to respond
proactively to other community planning needs (such as revising 4he GRFA regulations, the
Community 1'lanning process, and Lionshead redevelopmeut).
Early in the effort, staff enlisted members of the commtanity who were experienced with
the TOV's design review process to serve on a technical advisory committee ('TAC) to have "framework discussioas" upon which the staff would "build" recommendations for specific code
modifications. Summaries of the TAC framework discussions held on October 5 and October 25,
1995 are attached hereto for your review.
The staff's proposed recommendations were reviewed in worksessions by the Design
, Review Board (DRB) on February 21, 1996 and by the Planning and Environmental Commission
(PEC) on February26, 1996. The final PEC review and unanimous favorable recommendation
occurrcd on 1Vlarch 11, 1996.
. The essense of the proposed code modifications is: .
A. SIGIV CODE. Staff would assume revicw and approval authority over all requests
for new signs, using the same criteria now used by the DRB. DRB would have the authority to
call up a staff decision. All new sign programs would continue to be reviewed and approved by
the DRB.
B. DESIGIV REVIEVU PROCESS. The proposed amendments would clarify the
distinctions between the staff's and the DRB's review and approval authority and authorize staff
to'deternune compliance with the Design Review Guidelines on applications of minimal
complexity. Such items would includc: any applicaiton to modify an exissting building tha4
dces not significantly change the existing planes of the building and that is generally consistent
with the architectural design, including but not limited to exterior building finish materials,
exterior lighting, canopies or awnings, fences, antennae, satellite dishes, windows, skylights, and
minor commercial facade imrovements outside the commercial core areas of the Village and
s.
Y
Lionshead, as well as site improvements or madificatioas, including driveway modifications, site
grading, site walls, and installation of accessory structures and recreational facilities. DRB would
continue to have the authority to call up a staff decision. (Please refer to the actual ordinance
language at page 10 for detail.)
To assist Council in its deliberations on the proposed code modifications, enclosed
herewith in addition to the summaries of the two TAC meetings and proposed Ordinance No. 9
Series of 1996 is a copy of the March 11, 1996 PEC Memorandum and excerpts of minutes of the
March 11, 1996 PEC meeting. Staff will look forward to answering any questions you may have at the worksession and the evening meeting.
/ DESIGA1 REVIEW 'g'AC MEET'ING SLJMMARY _
Thurs. October 5, 1995PRESEIVT: SaYly Brainerd, Tom Braun, Pat Dauphinais, Diana Donovan, Jay Peterson, Bill
Pierce, Henry Pratt, I3ans Woldrich (Jim Morter submitted written comments
" wtnich were read to the group) AT1D ST'AFF: Susan, Mike, Jim, Randy, George,
Lauren (Bob McLaurin gave opening remarks) . FOCYJS: Fraanedvork Discussion . OUTCONlE: Consensus re: 1. I,eave with DRB : A1ew construction, demo/rebuilds, major commercial remodels and
all commercial alterations in CCI and CCII, and sign programs.
2. Staff will approve: Signs, lighting, canopies, colors, additions and alterations, site
improvements, retai.ving walls, fences, and landscaping. 3. We must strictly enforce the requirement for complete submittals.
4. Reduce redundancy of projects going to both PEC and DRB. (Decide what should
go where under what circumstances.) 5. Spell out in regularions and applications exactly what level of detail and submittal is
rcquired at cach stage.
6. Staff must be aware of neighborhood context whenreviewing applications.
ZOIeINIG ISSUES RAISED (for future review): .
1. GRFA . . .
2. Height restrictions/ interpretations
: 3. Site coverage limits
NEXT STEPS: 1. TAC and Staff will submit proposed substantive changes to design review guidelines
(or staff interpretations) by Friday, Octobcr 13 (to Randy Stouder).. .
2. 7"AC and staff will meet again on Wednesday; October 25 from 10 a.m. to noon in
ComDev Large Conference Room. .
COIvYliEIyT: We can expand the number of staff approvals starting immediately and probably
can adopt necessary procedural chan-es (e.g., si?n code chan'es) by our January 1, 1996 target.
Other substantive changes will not be adopt-able by January 1, 1996. Rt this time, I ariticipate
adoption by 1Vtarch 19 1996.. _ '
/ .
. I3ESIGIV 1ZEVIEW TAC MfEETIPdC SLTADVIARY
Wednesday9 October 25,1995 PRESENT: T'otn Braun, Pat I)aupbinaisa Diana Uonovan, Jay Peterson, Bill Pierce (Sally -
. Bxainerd svbmifted written comments which were read to the group) and ST.4FF:
Susa.n, Raqdy, George and I,auren. .
FOCUS: Recap of October 5 meeting (Framework Discussion) and continuing discussion
of evhat works9 what does not wor?s9 and possible improyements
SCJMMARY OF KEY CONUV=S: . 1. All new construction should be reviewed by DRB.
,
2. Applicants (particularly those unfamiliar with our guidelines/process/prior decisions)
do not lnow what they can and cannot do. There is a perception of arbitrariness. 3. More specific proceduraUjurisdictional guidelines are necessary.
4. We need to clarify/ modify the existi.ng (substantive) design guidelines:
* review intent (what are we nying to accomplish by design review?)
* adopt standards (vs. guidelines), where possible
* review why we require certain items of infomnation/certain level of detail .
. * clarify submitfial requuements and streamlinc administrative processing of .
applications '
d
MElrlO 6JM
TO: Planning and Envirwnentat Commission FILE
FR0M: ~ Comxnuaity DewelmpYnent Departmeent
DA'TE: March 11, 1996 .
RE: A rcquest for an aunendmcnt 40 the'Town of Vail Municipal Coic9 Chagter 54 of .
Title 18 (Design Iteeiew Guidelines) andTitle lb (Sign Code).
. Applicaat: 'g'own of Vail
Plannerr: Randy Stouder Ilo &QUEDOl~ ~F MU REO~
Staff is progosing to make ameadments 4vi certain sections of the 3ign Codc and the Design Review (iuidelines. We request thha4 the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) revievv
the proposed changes amd forvvard a recomneadation for approval of the code changes, as
outlined in Sec4ioa N of this ynemorandum, to the Town Council.. The specific, recomgnended
text changes can be found in Attachrnent #2 of this memorandum Background.informaation is
incorporated into Sections II and III of the memorandum. 'I'hese two sections explain the
rationale behind the casie changes.. Section V discusses the need for additional, fiature changes Yo
the Design Review Ciuidelines.
At a worksession held on February 26, 1996, the I'EC raised the following assiaes. Staff has
addressed each issue as noted belovv:
1) A question wras raased regcarding the notif'rcatdon requirerreertts f'op adjacertt property owners.
1'licre is eumntly.an adjacennt property owner notification requirenent only for sign '
variances. Staff is not proposing to change the current nodfication requirements.
Neighbors will stili see staking for projects that go to the DRB, annd vvill see staking of
some items subjcct to staff review. 3taff reviewcd the comments of the PEC and felt ghat
adding.a public notice gequirement to. the design review process would be-onerous and
contradictory to the purpose of the code changes tlnat are proposed herein.. -'I'he purpose
of the code chaages is to expedite the design review process for deeelopment proposals of
. minimal complexity and itnpact. Adding a public notice requirement would lengthen the
process and defeat the purpose of these code changes. Therefore, staff would aot
recoxnmend any changes to the public notification requirenents a4 this time.
1 .
a
2) The PEC felt that sign programs should be required for new and demo/rebuild commercial
proj u
this comment and has added this requirement to Section 16.12.10
paragraph C of the Sign Code.
3) A question was asked regarding how staff will decide which items to forward to the DRB and which items to review at a sta.fJ`'level.
This question was asked in response to a statement made by staff at the worksession.
' Staff emphasized that if a project was controversial or had wide-ranging ramifications, that
the project would be forwarded to the DRB for review. Staff does not intend to defer
decisions on projects of minimal impact to the DRB. We intead to review all projects that
fall within the parameters outlined in Section 18.54.040 paragraph C3 "StaffApproval".
Projects subject to staff review will be reviewed either iadividually, or by a group of
planners foP the more complex items, for consistency with the Design Review Guidelines.
If the proposal conforms with the guidelines, the proposal will be approvod. If staff
cannot come to a consensus on conforniance with the guidelines, the project will be
forwarded to the DRB for review. Any prnject for which we have received significant ,
- input from adjaceat property owrners, and where issues cannot be resolved between the
p'arties at the staff level, will also be foiwarded to the DRB for review.
II. BACKGROUND
= The Community Development Department is committed to unproving both customer satisfaction
and staff efficiency in all of our activities. One of the areas in which we are focusing our
` improvement efforts is the development review process. "Phase I" of our efforts is to improve the
efficiency of the development review process and involves code changes to portions of the Sign
Code (Title 16) and the Design Review Guidelines (Title 18, Chapter 54). The desired outcome
of these code changes is to expedite the processing of development proposals of minimal complexity, by giving staff the final review aud approval authority over applications that would .
otherwise have gone to the Design Review Board for review and approval. Staff believes that by
modifying the review and approval authority, that application processing times for proposals of
minimal complexity can be reduced from four weeks, to one week or less. Staff has already
_ identified several types of developrnent review applications that can be tutned around in 24 hours
or less. _
Section III of this memorandum summarizes changes in the office stiucture of the Community
Development Departrnent that have akeady been made to facilitate and expedite the processing of
development applications. Section IV of this memorandum summarizes the proposed changes to
Title 16 and Title 18 (Chapter 54 only). We have attached a copy of the proposed code changes
in ordinance format (i.e. text additions are indicated with shading and text deletions are indicated
with strike-thru). -
2
s{;
a Staff is proposiag the cade changes, and has re=structured tae Community Development
Departmcnt for several reasons. Community input is regularly geceived through an annual T'own-
vvide survey. That siarveyy has xegularly indicated a desirc to reducc the amount of time the 'g"own
takes to review and approve minar development proposals such as new commercial signs, cxterior
facade changes, minor a,dditions to residential-structures, minor changes to the exterior af
coYnYnercial establishrncnts outside of thc corc areas, decks, hot tubs, landscaping and other site
dewelopment improvenents. gn response to the Community 3urvey, staff undertook an internal
analysis of the Town's developmcnt review process. .
A series of nneetings wcre held euith the'Il'owci staffme.mbers directly involved in the review
process. Ps Technical Advisary Committee (TAC) vaas fornied Yo represent the people withia the
communi+ty that regularly deal with the Town's development reeieev prncess. T'he reeiew process
was examined and input gathered from Town Staff and the TA?C. at vvas determined that the
Tovvn's development gevieeu process should be changed to reduce processing tiffie for certaan
, types of applications. T'he prelinninary findings of this effort have culminated 'an the proposed
changes outlined belova. 111, G''~MMUNYT~ ~~VELOPIiIAT'I' I)EPAR'I'IVIENT OF~FICE S'Y'ItUCnM A.ND
PYtOC S5 C'HANGES
Based oa the community input vde have received so far, the (:omxnunity Developmeat Department
has been re-structared and the following changes have been rnade:
1) Prakccionat ervice Coztrtter.
Service hours have been established and professionals with decision maldng authority have been
. located up froat at a new service counter area to expedite the processing of certain 4ypes of
' applications 4hat were identified by staff as being of minimal complexity. A Building Liaison
Officer and a Planning Liaison Officer have been named and placed at the new service counter to
help review development applications and inform the general public of submittal requirements and
application review processes. A list of items of minimal complexity has bem developed b}? staff. .
, These items of minimal complexity geaerally do not require a review by 'd"ovva agencies other fban .
the Department of Cominunity Development, and thus can be staff approved, either on-the-spot
or within 24 hours (if a site visit is required). 7he initial list of items of minimal complexity hss
been attached to tbis xnenorandum (see Attachment #1). T'his list is eacpected to change or evolve .
over time. : _ 3
0
2) Develonment Review Annlications and Subntittal Reauirements:
The Town's development review application forms are being consolidated and revised to simplify
the papcrwork for applicants, and to clearly outline submittal information requirements. The
Community Develapment Department is now accepting only complete applications, and rej.ecting
applicarions that do not coatain all the iequired submittal inforrriation. Starting this year,
submittal deadlines were changed to noon instead of five o'clock on the subauttal deadline dates.
The noon deadline gives the Planning Liaison Officer time to check application submittals for
completeness the same day they are received. If the application is not complete, immediate
contact with the submitting party is be rmade by the Planning Liaison Officer and the missing items
aze requested. The applicant then has wp to 24 hours to make the application coniplete. If the
applicant cannot submit the required items within the 24hour grace period, the application is
returned and the applicant must start over on a new submittal deadline. -
3) Develonment Standards: -
The Town's internal Development Review Team (DR'I) is undergoing a development review
improvement process (DRIP) to examine potential process changes that will improve application
_ review and processing efficiency. The Town Manager and the DRIP steering committee have
oudined a governing philosophy that will guide the DRT in the formulation of a clearly defined .
review process and a written set of development standards. The developmeart standards will
essentially be a road map for applicants and design professionals. They will guide the
development of plans that will gain Town approval with little or no modification, eluninating the
review of multiple plan submissions, thus reducing processing time and frustration.
, 4) Code Revisions:
The Community Development Department will propose the code amendments in two phases. The
goal is to make the development review process more efficient, more understandable and
pre.dictable. IV. PROPOSED PHASE I COIDE REVISIONS
_ The following is a brief summary of the proposed Phase I code revisions being recommended by
staff. The Phase rchanges are largely chang'es to the administrative processing sections of both
Titles. 1} Sign Code itle 16):
Staff proposes to assume review and approval authority over all requests for new signs. Staff will
review all new sign requests using the same criteria the DRB currently uses. We reiterate the
review process here for informatianal piuposes. If a proposed sign meets the technical
requirements and the design guidelines outlined in the Sign Code, the request will be staff
4
v aPProved. If a sip proposal does not meet the technical requirements and the design guidclines
outlined in the Sign Codc, the applicant will be requestcd to modify the proposal to conforan to
the Code or it will be dernied. Applican4s evill be iaforined of appmval or deaial in vvgiting. '%'hc
code-based reason(s) for the ,4dministrator's decision will be cated in the evritc up. .
If the AdYninistrator denies a sign request based on lack of conformance with a design guideline
(e.g. earth tone, architectaral harrnony, etc.), the applicant will havc the right to appeal the
Adninis9rator's denial to the DltB, in vvri4ing. 3taff feels 4hat this is appropriate since design
guidelines are by natuee, somewhat subjective. Applications rejected hccausc the proposal does :
not rneet a technical requircment (e.g. size, height above gradc, e4c.) xnust be revised to meet the
scandard, or a variance can be filed with the PEC. Vaaianccs will be pxbcessed by the PEC and
evaluated according 40 the existing Sign Code variance critcria. 'd'he revievv process outlined
above will replace the existing process, whereby individual sign applications go ta the DRB for
review, with variaaices going to DRB for recommendation and then Council for final review and
~ decision.
Staff will notify the DRB of all administxative actions on sign reques4s by publashing a list mf approvals/denials on the next D1tB inectiag agenda. 1 he decision of the Adnain.istrator will becorne fnal upon publication on the DRB's meeting agenda. The DRB vvi11 have the right to
review the Administrator's decision at their next regularly scheduled meeling. 'I`he
Administrator's decision may be appealed by the applican4, in writing, within 10 days of the
decision becoming fixal. All new sign programs vvill continue to be reviewed and approved by the I)RB. Sign programs
will be required for all new or demo/rebuild multi-family residential projects, for new or
demo/rebuild commercial projects, and for other significant new developments or redevelopaien4
; projects at the discretion of the DRB.
Future changes to the Sign Code (Phase II) will involve the removal of all references to fees,
appeals and variances f'rom 4his Title, in favor of a cross refereace to other code sections, such as
the administrative 4atle (Title 2) or to the administrative chapter of the Z,oning Ordinance ('fl'itle
2) D,~cign Review Guad -lines (GhaptQr 54. Tide 1a):
- The I)esiga RBview (iuidelines are proposed to be amended to clarify the distinctioas between the - staff s and the *DRB's review and approval authority. The goal of 4hese revisions is to take the
less complex itemss offthe DRB's plate and allow staff make the dccisions of compliance with ghe
guidelines on applica9ions of gninirnal complexity. Staff can revievv and approve the iterns of
minimal corr?plexity rnore egf'iciently than the DRB. Staff, the TAC and the DRB identified the
types of development activities that should be reviewed at the staff level instead of at the board
level. Modifications to the DRB guidelines are proposed accordingly.
7'he text of section C(3) of "Freliminarjr/Final I)esign Review" portion of the Design Iteview
Guidelines (page 454c), lists the items that are subject to staff review and approval. Staff
. 5
r
proposes to expand paragraph (a) of this section by adding the foUowing items: exterior finish
materials (e.g. stonework, siding, roof materials, paint or stain), exterior lighting, caaopies or
awnings, fences, antennas aad satellite dishes, and minor commercial facade improvements
outside the commercial core areas of Vail Village and Lionshead. Staff would also like to add a
new pazagraph (d) allowing staffto revieev and appmve all site work (e.g. grading, landscapin8,
retaining walls, etc.) after the initial site development has occurred.
Staff believes that these changes do not significantly alter or reduce the review authority of the
DRB. Any decision of the Administrator would be noted on the next DRB agenda and would be .
subject to review by the DRB. Staff intends to exercise its approval authority judiciously,
deferring projects to the DRB that could have wide ranging implications or significant impacts to
sunounding properties. Special sensitivity will be exercised in the Vail Village and Lionshead
areas. Neighborhood cantext will be carefully considered in all staff decisions.
~ Again, fiuther changes to the Design Review Guidelines (Phase II) wiilfl involve the removal of allreferences to fees, appeats and variances, and lapse of approval frnm Chapter 54, in favor of
cross references to either Chapter 18.62, "Variances", or to Chapter 66, "Administration".
3) Phase I Code ChanPe.S P ul :
The proposed Phase I code changes have been presented to the planning staff, DRT, TAC, DRB
and the PEC informally in a series meetings and discussions. The PEC reviewed the proposed
changes at a public worksession on February 26, 1996. Staffproposes the following public
meeting schedule:
• March 11 th - PEC Final Review and Recommendation
• March 19th - Council Worksession and 1 st Reading of Ordinance
~ • April 2nd - Council2nd Reading of Ordinance
. Y. PROPOSED PHASE II CODE REYISI4NS -
In reviewing the Design Review Guidelines for the proposed Phase I code changes ouflined
above, it becazne clear to staff that further review and modification of the Design Review
Guidelines is necessary. The guidelines have evolved and changed in a piecemeal fashion over the
= past two decades. The guidelines have become overly complex and are poorly organized. The
~ Town Staff is now=considering a major overhaul of the guidelines. Far this effort, we are
considering utilizing a consultant who has the expertise necessary ta accomplish this major task. Staff anticipates that this overhaul will occur over the next twelve months to eighteen months.
Staff feels that the desiga guidetines should, at a minimum, be revised so that they are logically
presented in text and graphically illustrated where helpful. Design standards will be quantified to the extent practical.
' 6
q
Vlle Mffi1`ClM&= ~F 12iJPLYl..AB ffiOl\ Oi' REi' dL' 0'1 BV 1 i1L` LidB A1aY/ II 11E PE1L.
A suggestiorn evas Ynade by staff to elixninate duplica4ion of review between the DRB and the PEC
for major projects requiring revrieev by both boards. Fiowever, the TAC thought that a better
solution to resolving 4his issue was to pcrfoxm joint work sessions (I?RB and PEC) early on in the
, revieNV process so 4hat the DItB would not be put in the awkward pasition of wanting to revisit
design issues that had already been addressed by the PEC and/or the t;ouncil.
At a worksession held on February 21, 1996, the DRB was asked for input regarding the
. proposed I'hase I c.ode rewisions. 'd'he DRB was generally comfortable with Staff s proposed
code changes. Hoevever, the DRB was not in favor of joiat worksessions. "I"he DRB felt that
there evere simply too many decision makerrs (up to 11 people) present at the joint vvorksessions
for these meetings to be cffec4ive.
Staff solicited feedback frorn the PEC regarding this issue at a workscssion on February 26, 1996.
The PEC felt that the most effective evay to get the DitB involved was to schedule the iteffi for an
iaitial worksession with the PEC aad then, schedule the item for a subsequent worksessioa with
the DRB within the next vveek or two. This evould allow the PEC to give direction to the
applicant on major site development issues, and the DRB to give direction on nnajor design issues
at a very early point in the review process. The applicant could then revise the proposal to
address the initial concerns or decisions of the PEC and the DRB before the application would be
brought back to the PEC for final decision or recommendation to Council.
The PEC identified the following types of projects that should be reviewed accordiag to the
procedures outliaed above: lYiajor SDD Anendments, new SDI)'s, Major Exterior Alterations ia
= the commercial core areas and other major demo/rebuild projects in the commercial and business
• districts.
. 7
Items of 10/Iinilnal Complexity .
or
Planning Liaison Ufficer Approval Items
.
s
q
The Planaing Liaison Officer can approve the following itens evithin 24 houas of receipt of a
complete application/request:
l . Color changes
2. Landseaping 3. Fences
4. Exterior decks#
5. Window and door changes#
6. Slcylights#
7. Signs on a building that has.an approved sign prograna in place
8. Hot tabs*
9. Changes to exferior building Ynatcrials* 10. Exterior lighting*
11. C;hanges to previously approved plans*
12. lte-roof*
# May require the issumce of a Building Pemiit lrom the Building Divieion
f:\everyone\zandy\items.plo 9
~
~
Attachment # 2
Proposed Phase I Code Amemd.ments
A) Sign Code
(Title 16)
B) Desigm Review Guidelines
(Title 18 Chapter 54)
Note: Only the pages of the Code that are being amended are attached. For a complete
copy of either A or B above, as currently adopted, contact Communihy Development @
479-2138.
10
'VISION'S,
. ~ l)"E ~ 16e36)
teTs 16 •o~9 16.~~. ~
169 Chap. .
11
C6apter 16.08 ,
ADMIIITISTRATIOleT
Sections:
16.08.010 Appoiatmeat
16.08.020 Responsibffitnes.
16.08.030 EnfmrcemenL
16.08.040 Appeal. 16.08.050 Amendmentso
16.08.010 Appointment.
. The town manager shall appoint an administrator, who shall administer and enforce this
chapter. This position may be combined with another position of the town. (Ord. 9(1973)
15(1).)
16.08.020 Responsibilities. :
.1'he administrator shall be responsible for such duties as prescnbed in thas chapter, and
~ shall be responsble for enforcement of the sign regulations. (Ord. 9(1973) § 15(2) (part).)
16.08.030 . Enforcement.
The admimistrator may serve notice indicating the nature of any violation, or requiring the
removal of any sign in violation of this title, on the owner or his authorized agent. The
- administrator may call upon the town attorney to institute necessary legal proceedings to enforce
the provisions of this title, and the town attorney is authorized to institute appropriate actions to _
that end. The administrator may call upon the chief of police and his authorized agents to assist in
the enforcement of this title. (Ord. 9(1973) § 15(2) (part).)
16.08.040 Appeal.
A. Appeal trs6. or determination by th~::~ign~c~ode
administrator pursuant to the provisions of this chapter may be with the Design
.
Review Board b an a.PPlicant within ten da .
Y. Y.. Ys following the action or deternunahon:`b~o~g
A. decxs~tm a.~thc ~d~a~istrat~ :~ievomes: fmat:~ p~x~e~+~ .w~,r~ 8~e
~ Des;tg~i:Revtew l~t~d's ~fttmeeting:agenda. In the event of appeal, the Design Review Board, '
~ after reviewing a report from the aiiministrator, may confirm, reverse, ar modify the action of.the
administrator. Failure of the design review board to act within sixty days of the filing of appeal
shall be deemed concurrence in the action of the administrator. (Ord. 14 (1982) § lb: Ord.
_ 9(1973) § 3.)
_ . .
` t~ ~ga R~?ie~! :~rd
to t~ prov~ns ~f ~s: ~t,~ ~y be; fiied, :in wr~~eug~
. . , ::<.:<::;;> ~F
, . , . ~~fl~ t~y~.ot±~ng tb.e ac~on. ..In the ev~t~ c~~` app~: ~r
r+~cei~ a ~ ~e ~xg~ ~t~rnaw Board, m~y~:~.~:
th~ Des~g~
16.08.050 Amendments.
The regulations prescribed in this chapter may be amended, or repealed by the town
council. (Od. 9(1973) § 4.)
12
d
ChapteA° 16ofl$
~ ADWUNI$~~~~ PROCEDURE
See$HoFBse
Il6vIl2o010 AppUcgitions and appe°ovalfs req~iredL
Il6oIl2o020 Applecataoa~ procedue°eso _
Il6efl2e030 Yeeso ~
.Il6oIl2e0g.0 Applicatmow and appe°ovals rreqeairedo
It is unlawfial for any person to display any sign wifhin the town wi4hout complyiag with
the followig requiremen4s:
.
A. Corriple9ion of the sagn application;.ma
.
B. Revnedv admamstrator; ~
~ C. Revicw ,:arfthe Design IZewiew
Board:::.:»~`
:
Ms~dea~::: :~:P~MAY
. . . .
, .
7 9 9
D. Approval by the sign adYninistrator for signage not specifically required to be reviewed by
the Design Revieev Board.
(Ord.5(1993) §2: Ord.51(1978) § 1 (part).)
Il6oIl2o020 ApP?icatioen pu°ocedeuiresa
The procedures to be followed in fulfilling the inten4 of the sign ordinance are as follows:
A. A sign application for an individual sign or a sign program must bc obtained, properly
completed, and retuYaed to the sign administrat,or,
B. 'I'he sign adxninistrator shall accept and review the properly coxnpleted sign.applica4ion.
~sor v~nl;i approv~;..cvnditivIla~3~
. .
,
Vp.ic~tion b~s~d ~ $~s::c~nfs~rm~sc~' w~th ~s ~e as ~o~ws;
1) If the admiaistrator determines that the sigm application does not aneet t3ii::
:
' ~i~s~d ~:`:{~qp~q~ of:~' #i?:~' #ie>~> the technical re/~
uirem~t
s
i;:ii~~:;:;:;.;;:;....;i.. .":.a."".~:"~. . ~;:::;:;::9:~;: . `1 9
16:24 a~ 16.21i. ~f ~as:T~t~ . . ~ . .
s=e, heightandmwnbervfthisr' , the administrator deay the
application. Upon denial of an application by the administrator,
. .
~o~~?~.<:~i~`:.~cJ. tthe aP.licant may aesubmit a modified
~ . appiicatim 'p""fl-file an application for a varianceu` ~'1b:~6
. . . :
,
•
C
:
sbr~tor,::bsse~ :oe~des~~a *~:t
-W1~h ~rocedur~s <~I~n~ in ~p~~ ~ t4*fl~ ~pfit~ts. ;;~h~bo~t
13
0
notice. ~
hewing, >
; detein-n
that the si meets the
~`~:ai~ri;ti~5t€::~ui~~s
~ ~ gn
general requirements of this title, the sigs administrator may approve ~
. .
The-siga administrator sha11 notify the Design Review Board of all adminishative
decisions at their next re:g~arlY scheduled me '
.
The Desi Review Board
,
~ may require that any decision of the siga administrator be reviewed bq-it at its next
~ regularly scheduled meeting;
Applications for . , siga
programr, ~rp~;shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board at its next regularly
scheduled meeting in the presence of the applicant or his representative following a
. detennination by the sip administrator that the application has beea properly com~leted.:
~ ~ The Design Review Board will approve, conditionally approve or reject the sign pi~:':
application based upon its conformance with this title and its aesthetic value*<fi#"
decisioa;
1) If the Design Review Board determines that the sign program application does not
::>:>:<::«<.;.; :_:::;:.;<;;::>::>::::7:<:;:.~:»:;::::~:.:;:<::::::::;.;<:.;;:.;..;:.;:.;;
:::~~:;the
~ meet ~ c~g~. gu.~~ ~~ci;~>:.. .:;Ib::..............
4, ~ -
technical requirements, ex~~~t#>~~:r~`
. .
, _ , , the Design
Review Boazd sliatmap deny the application. Upon denial of an application by the
Design Review Boazd, ~a~ed vn;lac~.~ifc~npli~ith~fi~Mt~
: t'equitime~ts, the applicant may resubmit a modified application s3.r file an
: application for a variance. ~a ~ce ~ppn
d~l o~~6app~~m h~r the Desi R
gn eu~eww B,oar~ bas~ an ~.g~
. .....::r~::
II~. I~C.Si~~ Z ~ ~fl ~
.
th~ T o~cm Gt~uncil: in mc edttt~'c~ ~iat~d ~ ~
P 4':~$':t~
2) After having determined that the sign program meets the general requirements of ~
this title, the Design Review Board may appmve #~e;~~p!~~ti;~<Sigasnat
_ = > . .
` Upon the ~f #h~
~Proval ~ga ~plication by ~
D ~ a~:ar .....`:s.
Review Board, the
~ , . , .
administrator and-dn;-app~icast will-be duly notift*:#~e~~,.~of the......
wn#~:~±o~<~m~~:~
.
. . . .
th6
:giti~~:::>Upon rejschc~a
of the sign application perinit by the rv :
:~~;~;~f
. .
<Design Review Board, notification will be given in writing to the applicant
specifying the reason for disapproval and maldng recommendations to bring the sign prr
siPVagmm into conformance with the provisions of this title.
. 14
1 •
;
H:
A, HU71r&W7111V. A;FLIUU-UUI aFP-"1
. ,
COWTL*.
~ .
9 • .
51
~
:
: . . . . . . . . : ' . : : ry':.. ~ 4.v.v...i::i:::: r•I...:i ~ :ii .4:::: .
~r ~ . ~<:<>~.'b.~
~ . . . . .
v~;.
. (Cl#aapter 16.36
VARIANCES
Sectnons:
Il6-36e0fl0 Purrpose - ILemegataoaesa
Il6e36.020 ApSpDHcaQaoQ9.
Il6.36e030 IE'ee
; Il636e040 IE~esarung.
Il6e36e050 04.... foi.:apPt'ov~
~ Il636aOW . t~ ppM to town councu@ action.
Il6e36a0Il0' Puuposce - ILnm6tatuouus.
A. . gn ordcr to preveat or to lcssen such practical diff'iculties and unnecessary physical
hardships inconsis4ent wi4h the objectives of this title, variance from the regulations may
. be grantedi A practical difficulty or urmecessary physical hardship rnay result from the ~
siae, shape, or darnensions of a structure, or the location of the stnacture, from topographac
or physical conditiori.s on the sitc or in the immediate vicinity, or from othcr physical
limitations, street locations, or traffic conditions in the immediate vicanity. Cost or
inconvenience Yo the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be
a reason for granting a variance.
B. A variance may be granted with respect to any regulation contained in 4his title.
(Ord. 4(1975) § 2(L,)(1): Ord. 9(1973 17 (1).)
Il6-36o020 Appfleutiona
15
Application for a variance shall be made upon a form provided by the administrator. The
variance application shall include the application for a sign permit and shall also state the
~ applicant's reasons for requesting variance in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section
16.36.070. (Ord. 4(1975) § 2(L)(2): Ord. 9(1973) § 17 (2).)
16.36.030 Fee.
The town council shall set a variance fee sufficient to cover the cost of towns stafF time
and other expenses incidental to the review of the application. The fee shall be paid at the time of
application and shall not be refundable (Ord. 4(1975) § 2(L)(3): Ord. 9(1973) § 17(3).)
16.36.040 Hearung.
Upon receipt of a i~q;q~p~:variance. application, the administrator shall set a date for::.: .
t:~
e «.;<.;..;;;,::.;::...41
:.>~.;<`.t>:<:;hearing before th
A.
coi~d~ : ...........................:...lu~ga.ct~~~r~cn~a~~.t~.:v!...:.;.:.......:~:..:'~:#1~........
.
>
,~quu~n :
: ;:.:;.;:.:;;~Et::.
1t~: . .
~ ~t?f~r~€
~
.
.
~
4(1975) § 2(L)(4): Ord. 9(1973) § 17(4).)
,
16.36.050 Criteria for apprmval.
,
Before the baaiPlAhiiing; and ~xironme~tal asun acts on a variance application
from this 3'~, the applicant must prove physical hardship, and the fioud
~g.~
Envimn~r~ta1:C.~.~sa~:must find that: ~
- A. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, topography,
vegetation, sign structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent right-
of-way, which would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question:
provided, however, that such spccial circumstances or conditions are unique to the
particular business or enteiprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention, and do
~ not.apply generally to all businesses or enterprises; .
B. . That such special circumstances were not created by the applicant or anyone in privy to ~
~ the applicant;
C. That the granting of the variance will be in, general harmony with the purposes of this tide,
and will not be materially detrimental to the persons residing or worldng in the vicinity, to
_ adjacent pFOperty, to the neighborhood, or to the public welfare in generaT;'
D. The variance applied for dces not depart from the provisions of this tide any more than is
required to identify the applicant's business or use;
E. Such o"ther factors and criteria as the Pi `
anning ~~~~v~p.::3desigu
~ revitw-bowd deems applicable to the proposed variance.
(Ord. 4(1975) § 2(L)(7): Ord. 9(1973) § 17(7).)
16
~
, .
,
Il6~6o~?::::»:<; ; 7I'own (Counc° ° e
e
,
9
7
9
f
caase,
. . '..;::2i':;:::::;`::..'.:.;::.::::' ;.t::: .
: . ' .
:
.
. . . : •
' 17
" k
(
GZ7IDELINES 1tEVISIONS
B~ DE~IGN I~VIIE~V
(Title M Chapter 54)
~8
d
DE?~IGN EOEG EEW
~~~g9~9t1S~e
18o54o0g0 RQUtenQa
Il8o54e0Il~ ~eflnndons and e°u&es of consttrucdono
Il8e54o020 Boae°d or~~~atioEm
Il8e54e030 IIDesignaPProva?o.:::,..
: . . . . . : . . .
~o
04A
. t~ .........:.::.:::~~~e~~
Il8e54e0SIl Park aIlesip guid'elinesa
Il8o54o060 IIDesngn a°eview fm
Il8e54<0`I~ Pee°foir~ance bondo
Il8<54o08m A~~~igrative poH~deso
Il8o54e090. A~pea? to to~ ~ouncne
fl8e54oIlO0 IEnfforcemeniL .
Il8og4oIlfl0 ILapse off desngn e°eview approvaL
Il8o54e0Il0 II~~ente
Vail is a tovvn with a unique natural setting, intennationally knoev for i4s natural beauty9 .
. alpine enviromneat, and the coaipadbility of man-made structures vvi'th the envfronment,..These_
characteristics have caused a sigaificant auaiber of visitors to coxne to Vail evith many visitors
eventiaally becoming pm-na-
nent residents participating in commuaiey life.
These factors constitute an importwt economic base for the town, both for those who
earn their living here and for those who view the town as a precious physical possession. T'he
town council finds that new devclopment and redevelopment can have a substantial impact on the
character of an area in which it is located. Some fiazmful effects of one land use upon another can
be prevented through zoning, subdivision controls, and building codes. Other aspects of
development are more subtle and less amenable to exact nales put iato operation withou4 regard . to specific development proposals. Among these are the general forrn of the land before and after .
development, the spatial relationships of structures and open spaces to land uses within the '
vicinity and the town, and the appearance of buildings and open spaces as they contribute to the
area as it is being developed and redeveloped. ln order to provide for the timely exercise of
_ judgement in the public interest in the evaluation of the design of new development and
redevelopment, _th& tovvn council has created a design board (DRB) and design criteria.
T'herefore, in order to preserve the natural beauty of the town snd its setting, to protect
the welfare of the commuunity, 4o maintain the values created in the communiity, to protect and
enhance land and propertjr, for the promotion of health, safety, arnd general welfare in the
community, and to attain the objectives set out in this section; the improvemcnt or alteration of
open space, exteriar design of all new development, and all modifications to existing devclopmeat
shall be subject to design review as specified in this chapter. .
It is the intent of these guidelines to leave as much design freedom as possible to the
individual designer while at the same time xnaintaining the gemarlcable natuml beauty of the area
by creating stnactures which are designed to complemcn4 bo4h thcir individual sites. and
19
c
SlltlnllIIdlIIgS. }
The objectives.of design review shall be as follows:
A. To recognize the interdependence of the public welfare and aesthetics, and to
provide a method by which this interdependence may continue to benefit its citizens and
visitors;
B. To allow for the development of public and private pmperty evhich is in harmony with the
desired character of the town as defined by the guidelines herein provided;
C. To prevent the unnecessary destruction or blighting of the natural landscape;
D. , To ensure that the architectural design, location, configuration materials, colors, and
overall treatment of built-up and open spaces have been-designed so that they relate
hatmoniously to the natural land forms and native vegetation, the town's overall
appearance, with surnounding development and with officially appmved plans or
-..r. guidelines, if any, for the areas in which the structures are proposed to be located.
E. To protect neighboring property owners and users by making sure that reasonable
provision has been made for such matters as pedestrian and ve}uculai tcaffiic, surface water '
drainage, sound and sight buffers, the preservation of light and air, and those aspects of
design not adequately covered by other regulations wluch may have substantial effects on
neighboring land uses.
w_ (Ord. 39 (1983) § 1.)
18.54.015 Definitions and rules mf construction.
Any words, terms, or phrases used in this design review guide shall be defined and
interpreted in accordance with the definitions contained in Section 18.04 of the Vail Municipal
Code, unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning was intended. If the context is
unclear, the matter will be referred to the design review board for final determination.
= The distinction made between those items contained within this chapter that are
mandatory and those that are discretionary is that statements which are mandatory are prefaced
by the word shall, and the statements or guidelines which are discretionary (or merely
suggestions) are prefaced by the words should or may. In all instances, any particular or specific
controls over the general.
(Ord. 39 (1983) § 1.) 18.54.020 Board organization.
A. There is established a design review board (DRB) of the Town of Vail. The DRB should
= be composed of five members. Four members shall be residents of the town of Vail
appointed by the town council and the fifth member shall be a member of the planning and .
environmental commission of the town. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the cun-cnt desagn
review board members as of the date of the passage of this ordinance who will no longer
be residents of the Town of Vail due to the deannexation of the area laiown as West Vail
from the Town shall be permitted to complete their term on the design review board.
B. The terms of office for the four members at large shall be two years on an overlapping
basis and shall expire on February l of the year of termination. The term of office for the
planning and environmental comanission member shall be three ffionths.
C. A vacancy on the design review board shall occur whenever a member of the board is
20
r
, remowed by the tovva souncil, dies, becornes incapacita4ed and unable to perg'orrn his
duties for a period of sixty days, resigns, ceases to bc a aesident of the Town of Vail, or is
convicted of a felony. Rlotwithstanding the foregoing, the current design review board
inembers as of the date of the passagc of ttiis ordinance vvho vvill no longcr be residcnts of
the Toen of Vail due to the deannexation of the area knoevn as West Vail from the town
shall be permi4ted to complete 4heir term on the desiga revieev board. In the cvent a
vacancy occurs, the toen council shall appoint a successor to fill the vacancy and serve
the rexnainder of the term of the formcr Ynember. The board shall select its own chairman
and vice-chairinan froin unong i4s rnembcrs. T'he chaiaman, or in his absence, the vice-
chairman, shall be 41ne presiding officcr of its meetings. In the absence of both the
chainnan and the wice-chairinan from a ffieeting, the aaembers present svall appoint a
rnember to serve as actiag chairman at the ffieeting. All business of the board shall be hcld
at the muaicipal building of the TovNa of \/ail, unlcss othervvise specified, vvi4h adequate
notice given to all interested parties. T'hree members shall constitute a quorum for the
uaasaction of business, but in the absence of a quoaum, a lesser number shall adjourn any
. mec4ing to a later tine or date, and in the abscncc of all mcmbers, any staff member shall
adjouYn any xnee4ing Yo a later time or date. .
D. 'g'he board shall operate in accordaace with its own nales of pxoceduge as pmvided for in
Section 8.6 of the Home Rule Charter. 1'he rules shall be filed evith the town clerk and
maintaiaed in the records of the tovvn, and shall be subject to public anspection; prowided,
however, that the board shall submit its proposed nales or any amendment thereto to the
tovvn council evhieh, by motion, shall approve the nales or amenciment and direct their
adoption by the board or disapprove the pmposal with directions for redasion and
resubmission.
E. The design review board shall meet ~::Y~ first and third Wednesday of each month.
Additional rrieetings may be called by the design review board or the toevn staff if such
meetings are deemed necessary. Should the staff or the dcsign review board require any
- additional mee4ings
date ~ <:,; : ><;<;:;: ;><:><,;>>.;;:<.;:>::: :>•~;<t::>:-:::<::
notifi
cation
. of Yh
e
meetings shall be
IIC8.7338
, : ,
newsga~er of ~aa+e~1 cir~ula~o~;i€~ ;Eagle ~ou~it~3 uz~: ~da~ pnar
~:and shall also be found posted within the Community DevelopYnent I3eparnnent
of the Tovva of Vail. (Ord. 46(1991) § 1: Ord. 18(1985) 1, 2: Ord. 39(1983) § 1.) . Ilffio54o030 II?~ign ffipgniroaa?a
_ A. RIo person shall conunence removal of vegetation, site prcparation, building construction
- or demolition, dumping of material upon a site, sign erection, exterior alteration or
enlargement of an cxisting structure, paving, fencing or other improvements of open space
within the corpora4e limits of the Town of \/ail unless design approval has been granted as prescribed in this chaptcr. The addition of plant materials to existing landscaping,
gardening and landscape maintenance shall be exempt from this provision.
B. It shall be a violation of this chapter and the building permit for any person to commencc,
continue or coYnplete work that has not received design approeal as prescribed in this
chapter and/or is not in conformity with the-plans approved and authorized by the zoning
administrator and/or I)RB and the chief building official.
(Ord. 39(1983) § 1.)
21
y
18.54.040 ARaterial to be submitteid/procedures.
Items A and B of this section have not been affected by the proposed code changes and therefore
are not included here.
C. Preliminary/final design review.
Item 1 of this section has not been affected by the proposed code changes and therefore
is not included here.
2. Staff/DRB Procedure.
The Department of Community Developmeat shall check all material
. submitted for design review for compliance with-;:~;applicable provisions of the
oning Code, Subdivision Regulations, and with Section 18.54.040C
Z:::.
,
::::t>:..:.::.,::..:<z; :::::::::::::::,:::::>::::<..;::>;>;>::>:<::;::::~,>::>::::>><;::>
e applicahon is
s, ~~cq~~:;o~'~5::~. If th
foland to be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Zoningode,
!.~vision R;egulations, and Section 18.54.040(.; the project shall ~A& be
placed upon the agenda of the next appropriately scheduled DRB meeting in
accordaace with the required application submittal deadlines on file in the .
Community PeveloPment DePartment c~~B
>:>::>::<;<:::>:::>:::
e w~~.tt~ ~n?ee af th~&.8ec~a ~t~~:If the application is
found not to be in compliance with ft:`applicable provisions of the0oning Code
and Section 18.54.040;(1), the application and materials shall be rehuned to the
applicant with an explanation of the zarning administrator's findings. The z+oniag
administrator may require any additional items from the applicant as may be
. necessary for complete and proper design review.
a. The or.the Design:Review Board shall review the application
and supporting material, and if the design of the project is found to comply
with the objectives and design guidelines of this chapter, the jA"
. ;
4rthe:Design Review Board shall approve the design of the project;
. .dn~u~enting such approval in writing ~.d no0hg ap
proval. If additional items are needed as specified herein to determine
whether the project will comply with the purposes, statement and design
_ guidelines of this chapter, the DRB may give preliminary approval or table
the project until the ncxt regularly scheduled meeting. If the project is
tabled or if preliminary approval is given, the board shall specify the
conditions and additional and/or modified materials which must be
,
subuutted by the applicant to the Design PevieW.;~oard
~r., including any changes in the design of the project. The
applicant may also table the application to a future meeting for any reason.
b. If the project is found to conflict with the design guidelines, the
st~'avr.the D~ ~~~:Board shall disapprove the design of
the project. Any disapproval shall be in writing and shall specifically
describe the design guidelines with which the design of the project does not
22
f
comply aad the manncr of noncompliancc.
the 1~I~ shall have thirty days ~~asid~r and appmve or deny
aa applica4ion. T'he time for action may be extendod at the request of the
applicant.
. d. IP changcs in the design of thc project are aequested, the boand shall
~ approve, disapprove or request further changes evithia thiriy days of the
meetiag at which the I)RB receaves the chaages unless aa 'extension is ~
agreed to by the applicant.
e. 1'he applicarnt or his auYhorized repaescntatiwe shall be present at the design
~ revieev boaed xneetiag.
3. 3taff approval. Z'he zonmg ~administrator ffiay approve any of the follovNing
applications:
~ a. Any application to an existiag building that does not signaficantly
change the existing planes of the building and is geneYally consastent wita
the architectural desi ' including, but ~
• :::.iii:.::.i:::'.ii:"q:L.i"i:4ii:.:::i::iiii:...:r.iii::i.i:::::::lii
not l~ited ~::~::i:::~"or~~ttt'~ : :~'a~~8::,
~ ~1E~~~1 . ,
:;0~:~~#~i$S,
.
~i~aa~„ safi~~~i#~:d~~s; v~nndoevs, skylights,~idiag,~~~a1
. :
.
~c~ ~r+~~?~trt o~~e ~::~~c~::~e::~ ~.Ya~;'~`.
_ .
and other similar anodifica~ions;
b. Any application for an addition to an existing building that is consistent
with the architectural design, materials and colors of the building, and
approval has been received by an authorized member of a condominiuYn
- association, if applicable;
c. Any application to remove or modify the existing vegetation or landscaping
upon a site ; anti
d: ~pplica~ivn far si~ imnpavve~nfs cu .c~c~s;~but:~
~YOdN W! 44r6Y . ' . \ ~ ~ ~ ~
° ewBY FYt~1~IC8~1~S9 5t~ ..I., ~S~t~
00 Msory stnacttres or recrsationat*11~~5; ; ~ .
In the abave-specified cases, the zoniTrradministrator may revicw and approve the
applicaYion, approvc the application with ceytain modifications, ..........t:~
a~pi~lica~o~;::or msg? refer the areq application to the D*esign Review Jaoard for
deoision. All other applicarions shall be referred to the I)esign ~:eview Board. ~
(Ord. 9(1993) § b: Ord. 12(1988) § 1: Ord. 39(1983) § 1.)
Il 8.54e080 Adminasta°ffittnve po?icices.
A.
• . . . : ;
~ ~:~:e~is~~i:>o~'8i~
a~am~s#rato~ ~all ~~n~reyed ~~e ap~~c~ o~ ~s::agea~ A~es~s fi..... d~
~aiov~:: shall be I
Wed:
23 .
~
. ,
app~ro~-The °strator shall pu~a
:
summary of all decisions made '-"?~:~:~g;8~~~~:~f~~sitg~,~~w Bc~ard.
~~mr~. ~a.
next
B. A decision':~~<~~:`~ administrator may be appealed to the ~esign
R-Teview Ofioard by the applicant;
~ia~;:adjacent properiy owner,
~<::.::»><::<::
::~~n>:~~:::..:.. ~.~ra~'~;:~~<:~....:.:.: i~:
:
ofthe The dOesign rfF;eview ~~oazd i,y
; . .
a~» .
.
c..:a~e~c~a#~:~~::::.. sc.;~g;
~ . . . . : .
. . C. .
D. The design review board shall consider the appeal in the same manner as the board
considers mll other applications coming before it.
. (Ord:"39(1983) § 1.) ~
18.54.090 Appeal to town council.
A. ~,~g~;to the ~'own c~ouncil,
by the applicant,;~r;::": adjacent properiy'owner, or by the tTown nManager. T'he-down
c0ouncil can also call-up mattcrs by a majority vot .
B. For a11 appeals, the appeal must be filed in writing ten days following the decision or must
~ be called-up by the-tTown cCouncil at their next regularly scheduled meeting.
C. The cCouncil shall hear the appeal within thirty days of its being filed or called up with a
possible thirty day extension if the council finds that there is insufficient information.
(Ord. 39(1983) § 1.) .
24 .
0
Galen Aas9and had no comment. DRAFT
Pam Hopkins askec9 if the applicant could stain the soffiYs.
ANike RAoltica said it should be pain4ed white to match the rest of the building.
Greg Moffet asked wha$ the timing was for the requesY.
Pam Hopkins said next spring of 1997.
Greg ANoffeY suggesfed that it integrate with La Tour.
Greg Amsrlen made a motion 4ha4 the reques4 be approved per the staff recommendation on
page 8 of the memo wiYh an additional condition that the applicant pay the parking fee prior to the
issuance mf Building Permit aY the prevailing rate. _
~ Henry Pra4f seconded the motion. It passed unanimously by a vote ofi 7-0. 5. ATequest fior proposed amendments to numerous sections of The Towrn ofi Vail Municipal
- Code, including but not limi4ed to Titles 16 & 18 Yo ailow for modifications fo the Sign
Code and the Design Reuiew Guidelines.
Applican4: Town of Vail
Planner: Randy Stouder
Randy Stouder surrmarized the proposed changes to the Sign Code and the Design Itevieev
Guidelines. He referred the PEC to Attachment #2 of the staffmemo which includes the ac4ual
, texe of the changes proposed. He presented the proposod code changes as ouYlined ia Sectioa gV
' of the staff inemorandum. He stated that the changes being proposed would allow staff to review
and approve individual sign requests and minor design review requests. He stated that all staff
decisions would be published on the next Design Review Board (DRB) meeting agenda. The
DRB would have the ability to "call-up" any staff decision at that rrieeting. He reiterated that the -
proposed changes do not remove the right to appeal a staff decision to the DitB, and a DRB .
decision to the Town Council.
He stated that the proposed changes were in accordance with the findings of the Technical
Advisory Committee (T'AC) tbat was formed to guide staff'in reviewing the code. Randy stated
that staff wouid forward coatroversial requests on to the I)RB for review, especially where an
adjacent property owner vvas raising an objection. He also stated that high profile projects in the
Vail Village and Lionshead areas would be sent to the I)RB for decision.
Itandy stated that sign programs will be required on.rriost new or demolrebuild commercial
projects. Itandy stated that sign variance requests would be sen4 4o the PEC for review rather
than to the DRB and then The Town Council (per cialrent process).
Planning and Environmental Commiasion
Minutes
March 11, 1996 Id
.
. .
DRAFT.,
Greg Moget noted for the record that there was no public comment on this item.
Henry Pratt asked if an adjacent property owner could still appeat.
Randy Stouder said yes.
There were no comments from the other Commissioners.
Kevin Dei+ghan made a motion for approval of the proposed changes as shown in Attachment 2
of.the staff inemorandum.
Henry Pratt seconded the motion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0.
6. A tequest for a change to the Town of Vail Survey Policy relating to the establishment of
base elevations used in the calculation of building height.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Lauren Waterton
Mike Moilica, on behalf of Lauren Waterton, listed the 3 options in the memo regarding
modifications to the survey policy. Staff was recommending Option No. 2.
Greg Moff et noted for the record that there was no public present with any comments.
Henry Pratt said that he is not in favor of Option No. 3 or Option 2 since it has hidden cost
increases and time increases. He is in favor of Option No. 1. Not raising the height limit is less
burdensome for staff and the Boards and it would not allow people to design to those tolerances.
Greg Amsden is in favor of Option fVo. 2, since the bulk of people build within height limits.
Kevin Deighan is in favor of Option No. 2 for the reasons stated by Henry Pratt.
Galen Aasland agrees with Henry. Hp doesn't like Option No. 2, since it increases costs and
time with the.surveying. It is not making it easier for people in Town. .
Diane Gotden had no comment.
Gene Uselton thinks Option No. 2 raises costs and increases time. He feels with Option No. 2,
you know in advance what the ridge will be.
Greg Moffet is in favor of Option No. 2. He has the same reasons as Gene Uselion and Greg
Amsden. . Greg Amsden made a motion, per the staff memo, for approval of Option No. 2.
Gene Uselton seconded the motion.
Planning and Fnviromnental Commission
Minutes
March 11, 1996 5
ORDINANCE NO. 9
Series of 1996
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 16.08, 16.12 AND 16.36; AND TITLE
18, CHAPTER 18.54 OF THE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE
FOR THE EXPEDITIOUS REVIEW OF REQUESTS FOR DESIGN REVIEW OF ITEMS OF
MINIMAL COMPLEXITY.
. WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to improve both customer satisfaction and
efficiency in the processing of development review applications; and
WHEREAS, the Tovvn Council finds that certain changes to the administrative
processing chapters of the Sign Code are necessary to improve the efficiency of the Design
Review Process; and
WHEREAS, the Tovvn Council finds that certain portions of the Design Review
Guidelines regulating the processing of applications for items of minimal complexity can be
revised to improve the overall processing efficiency; and
WHEREAS, the Tovun Council recognizes that a Technical Advisory Committee was
- formed to guide staff in the formulation of code amendments to improve the processing of
development revievv applications; and
WHEREAS, the Town Councif finds that public notification as required by Section
18.66.080 has occurred; and public hearings have been held by the PEC and the DRB; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that both the Design Review Board and the
_ Planning and Environmental Commission have reviewed the proposed code amendments
contained in this ordinance and that both bodies unanimously recommend that the amendments .
be approved as contained herein; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of
the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
RIOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUiVCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1. Titfe 16, Chapter 16.08, "Administration," is hereby repealed and reenacted to
read as follov??s:
1 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
Chapter 16.08
ADMINISTRATiON
Sections:
16.08.010 Appointment.
16.08.020 Responsibilities.
16.08.030 Enforcement.
16.08.040 Appeal.
, 'i 6.08.050 Amendments.
16.08.010 Appointment.
The Town Manager shall appoint an administrator, who shall administer and enforce this
chapter. This position may be combined with another position of the Town. (Ord. 9(1973) §
15(1).)
16.08.020 Responsibilities. .
The administrator shall be responsible for such duties as prescribed in this chapter, and
' shall be responsible for enforcement of the sign regulations. (Ord. 9(1973) § 15(2) (part).)
16.08.030 Enforcement.
Tlie administrator may serve notice indicating the nature of any violation, or requiring the removal of any sign in violation of this title, on the owner or his authorized agent. The
administrator may call upon the town attorney to institute necessary legal proceedings to
enforce the provisions of this title, and the town attorney is authorized to institute appropriate
actions to that end. The administrator may call upon the chief of police and his authorized
agents to assist in the enforcement of this title. (Ord. 9(1973) § 15(2) (part).)
16.08.040 Appeal.
A. Appeal of an action or determination by the administrator pursuant to the provisions of
this chapter may be filed, in writing, with the Design Review Board by any applicant within ten
days following the action or determination becoming final. A decision of the administrator
becomes final upon publication of the dPCision on the Design Review Board's next meeting
agenda. In the event of appeal, the Design Review Board, after reviewing a report from the
administrator, may confirm, reverse, or modify the action of the administrator. Failure of the
Design Review Board to act within sixty days of the filing of appeal shall be deemed
concurrence in the action of the administrator. (Ord. 14 (1982) § 1b: Ord. 9(1973) § 3.)
2 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
~
B. Appeal of an action by the Design Review Board on a sign program application pursuant
to the provisions of fhis chapter may be filed, in writing, with the Town Council by the applicant within ten (10) days fotlovving the action. In the event of appeal, the Town Council, after
receiving a report from the.Design Review Board, may confirm, reverse, or modify the action of
the Design Revievv Board.
16.08.050 Amenc8avaeaats.
The regulations prescribed in this chapter may be amended, or repealed by the town
. council. (Od. 9(1973) § 4.)
SECTlON 2. Title 16, Chapter 16.12, "Administrative Procedure," is hereby repealed and
reenacted to read as follows:
Ghapter 16.12
ADMIiVISTRe4TIVE PROCEDURE
Sectioavs:
` 16.12.010 AppBacations and approvals requared.
16.12.020 t~ppslCa$90PE pPOC@dUPeS.
16. 12.030 Fees. 16.12.010 Applacation and approvals requured.
It is unlawful for any person to display any sign within the Town without complying with
the foNowing requirements:
A. Completion of the sign app{ication; and
B. Revievv and approyal of the application for a sign by the administrator; or
C. Review and approval of the application for a sign program by the Design Review Board.
Sign programs shall be required for all new or demo/rebuild multi-family residential
projects and for nevv or demo/rebuild commercial projects. Sign programs may be
required, at the discretion of the DRB, for other significant new developments (e.g.
subdivisions, ski base facilities) or redevelopment projects; and .
D. Approval by the sign administrator for signage not specifically required to be reviewed
by the Design Review Board.
(Ord.5(1993) §2: Ord.51(1978) § 1 (part).)
16.12.020 App@ication procedures.
The procedures to be follovued in fulfilling the intent of the sign ordinance are as follows:
3 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
'
A. A sign application for an individual sign or a sign program must be obtained, properly
completed, and returned to the administrator;
B. The administrator shall accept and review the properly completed sign application. The
administrator will approve, conditionally approve, or reject the sign application based
upon its conformance with this title as follows:
1) If the administrator determines that the sign application does not meet the design
guidelines contained in Chapter 16.16 of this Title, and the technical
. requirements, contained in Chapters 16.20 and 16.22 of this Title, the
administrator shall deny the application. Upon denial of an application by the
administrator, based on lack of compliance with the technical requirements, the
applicant may resubmit a modified application or file an application for a variance
in accordance with Chapter 16.36 of this Title. Upon denial of the application by
the administrator, based on the design guidelines, the applicant may resubmit a
modified application or file an appeal with the Design Review Board in
` accordance with the procedures outlined in Chapter 16.08 of this Title.
2) If the administrator determines that the sign meets the general requirements of
this title, the administrator shall approve the application.
3) The administrator shall notify the Design Review Board of all administrative
decisions at their next regularly scheduled meeting by publication of the
decisions on the Design Review Board's next meeting agenda. The Design
Review Board may require that any decision of the administrator be reviewed at
its next regularly scheduled meeting;
C. A sign program application shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board at its next
regularly scheduled meeting in the presence of the applicant or his representative
following a determination by the administrator that the.application has been properly .
completed. The Design Review Board will approve, conditionally approve or reject the
sign program application based upon its conformance with this title and its esthetic
value as follows: .
1) If the Design Review Board determines that the sign program application does
not meet the design guidelines contained in Chapter 16.16 of this Title, and the
technical requirements, contained in Chapters 16.20 and 16.22 of this Title, the
Design Review Board shall deny the application. Upon denial of an application
4 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
e
by the Design Review Board, based on lack of compliance with the technical -
requirements, the applicant may resubmit a modified application or file an
application for a variance in accordance vuith Chapter 16.36 of this Title. Upon
denial of an application by the Design Review Board, based on the design
guidelines, the applicant may resubmit a modified application or file an appeal
with the Tov?rn Council in accordance with the procedures outlined in Chapter
16.08 of this Title.
2) After having determined that the sign program meets the general requirements
of this title, the Design Review Board shafl approve the application.
D. Upon approval of the sign application by the administrator, or approval of the sign
program by the Design Review Board, the administrator will duly notify the applicant of
the approval in writing. The written approval will include any conditions placed on the
approval by the administrator or the Design Review Board. Upon denial of the sign
application by the zoning administrator, or denial of the sign program by the Design
' Review Board, notification will be given in writing to the applicant specifying the reason
for disapproval and making recommendations to bring the sign or sign program into
conformance with the provisions of this title. .
16.12.030 Eees
The Town Council shall set a reasonable fee for fiiing a sign application. The fee shall
be sufficient to caver the cost of Town staff time and other expenses incidental to the review of
the appfication. The fee wrill be adopted in a fee schedule. The fee shall be paid at the time of
application and shall not be refundable.
SECTIOiV 3. Title 16, Chapter 16.36, "Variances," is hereby repealed and reenacted to read
as follows:
Chapter 16.36
!lA921ANCES
Secgaoaas:
96.36.010 Purpose - Liavaotations.
16.36.020 App96cagaon.
16.36.030 Fee
16.36.040 Hearang,
5 Ordinance No. 9. Series of 1996
16.36.050 Criteria for approvaf.
16.36.060 Appeal to Town Counci{.
16.36.010 Purpose - Limitations.
A. In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical
hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title, variance from the regulations may
be granted. A practical difficulty.or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the
size, shape, or dimensions of a structure, or the location of the structure, from
. topographic or physical conditic>ns on the site or in the immediate vicinity, or from other
physical limitations, street locations, or traffic conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost
or incanvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not
be a reason for granting a variance.
B. A variance may be granted with respect to any regulation contained in this title.
(Ord. 4(1975) § 2(L)(1): Ord. 9(1973) § 17 (1).)
16.36.020 Application.
' Application for a variance shall be made upon a form provided by the administrator. The
variance application shall include the application for a sign permit and shall also state the
applicant's reasons for requesting variance in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section
16.36.050. (Ord. 4(1975) § 2(L)(2): Ord. 9(1973) § 17(2).)
16.36.030 Fee.
The Town-Council shall set a reasonable variance fee for filing a sign variance
application. The fee sha11 be sufficient to cover the cost of Town staff time and other expenses
incidental to the review of the applicatian. The fee will be adopted in a fee schedule. The fee
shall be paid at the time of application and shall not be refundable (Ord. 4(1975) § 2(L)(3): Ord.
9 (1973) § 17(3).)
16.36.040 Hearing.
Upon receipt of a complete variance application, the administrator shall set a date for,
and conduct a hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter 18.62 of_Title 18. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.62 conflict
with, or differ from, the specific provisions contained in Chapter 16.36, the provisions of Chapter 16.36 shall override and/or nullify the cnnflicting provisions of Chapter 18.62. (Ord. 4(1975) § 2
(L)(4): Ord. 9(1973) § 17(4).)
, 6 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
.
16.36.050 Criqeria for appPOVat.
Before the Planning and Environmental Commission acts on a variance application from
. this Title, the applicant must prove physical hardship, and the Planning and Environmental
Commission must find that:
A. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings,
topography, vegetation, sign structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the
adjacent right-of-way, which would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in
. question: provided, however, that such special circumstances or conditions are unique
to the particu{ar business or enterprise to which the appficant desires to draw attention,
and do not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises;
B. That such special circumstances were not created by the applicant;
C. That the granting of the variance will be in general harmony with the purposes of this
title, and will not be materially detrimental to the persons residing or working in the
' vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or to the public welfare in general;
D. The variance applied for does not depart from the provisions of this title any more than
is required to identify the applicant's business or use;
E. Such other factors and criteria as the Planning and Environmental Commission deems
applicable to the proposed variance.
(Orc1. 4(1975) § 2(L)(7): Ord. 9(1973) § 17(7).)
16.36.060 AppeaB to Town CoaancaB:
An appeal to the Town Council of a Planning and Environmental Commission action on a
variance may be made in accordance with the appeal process as outlined in Section 18.62.070
of the Zoning Code.
SEGTION 4. Title 18, Chapter 18.54, "Design Review," the table of contents only, is hereby
repealed and teenacted to read as follows:
IIDESIGN REVIEW
Secteons:
Il8.54.0Il0 ff nteimt.
Il8.54.015 ~efiffifl$lloIlIlS BII9tIl Il'6Ille5 0f CO&1S$1'1HCt&oBIl.
18.54.020 Board orgaffiization
7 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
18.54.030 Design approval.
18.54.040 Material to be submitted/procedures.
18.54.050 Design Guidelines.
18.54.051 Park design guidelines.
18.54.060 Design review fee.
18.54.070 Performance bond.
18.54.080 Administrative policies.
18.54.090 Appeal to town council.
18.54.100 Enforcement.
18.54.110 Lapse of design review approval.
SECTION 5. Title 18, Chapter 18.54, "Design Review," Section 18.54.020," Board
Organization," Paragraph E is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
E. The Design Review Board shall meet the first and third Wednesday of each month.
Additional meetings may be called by the Design Review Board or the town staff if such
meetings are deemed necessary. Should the staff or the Design Review Board require any
_ additional meetings, a notifieation of the date and items to be reviewed at.the additional
meetings shall be given by publication once, in a newspaper of general circulation in
Eagle County, on the Friday of ghe week prior to the meeting.
(Ord. 46(1991) § 1: Ord. 18(1985) 1, 2: Ord. 39(1983) § 1.)
SECTION 6. Title 18, Chapter 18.54, Section 18.54.040, "Material to be
submitted/procedures," Paragraph C, "Preliminary / Final Design Review," Items 2 and 3 are
hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
2. Staff/DRB Procedure.
The Department of Community Development shall check all material
submitted for design review for compliance with the applicable provisions of the
Zoning Code, Subdivision Regulations, and with Section 18.54.040C (the
submittal requirements of this section as outlined above). If the application is
8 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
.
found to be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code,
Subdivision Regulations, and Section 18.54.040(C), the project shall either be
placed upon the agenda of the next appropriately scheduled Design Review Board
meeting in accordance with the required application submittal deadlines on file in
the Community Development Department, or be reviewed by the administrator in
accordance with item three of this section (staff approvals). If the application is
. found not to be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code
and Section 18.54.040 (C), the application and materials shall be returned to the
applicant with an explanation of the administrator's findings. The administrator
may require any additional items from the applicant as may be necessary for
complete and proper design review.
a. The administrator or the Design Review Board shall review the
_ application and supporting material, and if the design of the project is
found to comply with the objectives and design guidelines of this chapter,
the administrator or the Design Review Board shall approve the design of the project, documenting such approval in writing and noting any
conditions of approval. If additional items are needed as specified herein
- - _ to determine whether the project will comply with the purposes, statement
and design guidelines of this chapter, the Design Review Board may give
preliminary approval or table the project until the next regularly scheduled
meeting. If the project is tabled or if preliminary approval is given, the
board shall specify the conditions and additional and/or modified materials
which must be submitted by the applicant to the Design Review Board or
to the administrator, including any changes in the design of the project.
The applicant may also table the application to a future meeting for any
reason.
b. If the project is found to conflict with the design guidelines, the
administrator or the Design Review Board shall disapprove the design of
the project. Any disapproval shall be in writing and shall specifically
9 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
describe the design guidelines with which the design of the project does
not comply and the manner of noncompliance.
c. Following the final review of an application by the Design Review Board
at a public meeting, the Design Review Board shall have thirty days to
consider and approve or deny an application. The time for action may be
extended at the request of the applicant.
d. If chariges in the design of the project are requested, the Design Review
Board shall .approve, disapprove or request further changes within thirty
days of the meeting at which the Design Review Board receives the
changes unless an extension is agreed to by the applicant.
e. The applicant or his authorized representative shall be present at the
Design Review Board meeting.
. 3. Staff approval. The administrator may approve any of the following applications:
a. Any application ti) modify an existing building that does not significantly
change the existing planes of the building and is generally consistent with
the architectural design, including, but not limitecl to exterior building
finish materials (e.g. stonework, siding, roof materials, paint or stain,),
- - - - ; exterior lighting, canopies or awnings, fences, antennas, satellite dishes,
windows, skylights, minor commercial facade improvements outside the
commercial core areas of Vail Village and Lionshead, and other similar
modifications;
b. Any application for an addition to an existing building that is consistent
with the architectural design, materials and colors of the building, and
approval has been received by an authorized member of a condominium
association, if applicable;
c. Any application to remove or modify the existing vegetation or
landscaping upon a site ; and
10 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
d. Any application for site improvements or modifications including, but not
limited to, driveway modifications, site grading, site walls, installation of
accessory structures or recreational facilities.
In the above-specified cases, the administrator may review and approve the
application, approve the application with certain modifications, deny the
application, or refer the application to the Design Review Board for decision. All
other applications shall be referred to the Design Review Board.
(Ord. 9(1993) § 6: Ord. 120988) § 1: Ord. 39(1983) § 1.) SECTION 7. Title 18, Chapter 18.54, Section 18.54.080, "Administrative policies," is hereby
repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
18.54.080 Admannstratuve pmlueues. A. The decision of the administrator shall be conveyed to the applicant or his agent in
writing. Reasons for denial or conditions of approval shall be listed. The administrator
shall publish a summary of all decisions made on the next meeting agenda of the Design
Review Board. The administrator's decision becomes final upon publication on the
agenda..
B. A decision made by the administrator may be appealed to the Design Review Board by
the applicant, or an adjacent property owner, in writing, within 10 days of the
administrator's decision becoming final. The Design Review Board may call-up a
decision made by the administrator at their next regularly scheduled meeting.
C. The Design Review Board shall consider the appeal in the same manner as the board
considers all other applications coming before it.
(Ord. 39(1983) § l.)
SECTION 8. Title 18, Chapter 18.54, Section 18.54.090, "Appeal to Town Council," is hereby
repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
11 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
18.54.090 Appeal to Town Councal.
A. A Design Review Board decision may be appealed to the Town Council, by the applicant,
by an adjacent property owner, or by the Town Manager. The Town Council can also
call-up matters by a maj ority vate.
B. For all appeals, the appeal must be filed in writing ten days following the decision or
must be called-up by the Town Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting.
C. The Town Council shall hear the appeal within thirty days of its being filed or called up
with a possible thirty-day extension if the Town Council finds that there is insufficient
information.
(Ord. 39(1983) § 1.)
SECTION 9. If any part, section, subvection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is
for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this
' ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless
of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be
dectared invalid.
SECTION 10. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that fhis ordinance is
necessary ..and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vaii and its inhabitants
thereof.
SECTION 11. The repea{ or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal
Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right whicM has accrued, any duty
imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution
commenced, nor any other action or praceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the
provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not
revive any provisions or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
INTRO,DUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 19th day of March, 1996, and a public
12 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996
~
.
hearing on this Ordinance on the 2nd day of April, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Attest:
, Holiy L. NlcCutcheon, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED OiV SECOND READING AiVD ORDERED PUBLiSHED
in full this 2nd day of April, 1996.
Robert W. Armour, Nlayor
Attest:
Holly L. McCutclieon, Town Clerk
13 Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1996 •
d
iViINUTES
VAIL TOV1/N COUNCIL MEETING
February 6, 1996
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vaii Tovvn Council vvas held on Tuesday, February 6, 1996, in the Council
Chambers of the Vail Municipal Buiiding. The meeting vuas called to order a4 approximately 7:30
P.M.
iVIEMBERS PRESEfVT: Bob Armour, Niayor
r Sybill Navas, Nlayor Pro-Tem
6Cevin Foley
Rob Ford .
Niike Jewett
Paul Johnston ,
Ludwig Kurz
iViEMBERS ABSEiVT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Robert W. iVicLaurin, Towrn Manager
R. Thomas fVioorhead, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Touvn fVianager
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
Fars4 item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Touvn of Vail resident J 6 Smith voiced
his concerns regarding the regional transportation authority and their working on expanding
the regional transportation system. Mr. Smith complained about people driving 40o fasfi and
° recklessly in our area and urged Councit to oppose an increased 75 mph speed limif.
Second was the Consent Agenda which consisted of approval of the minutes for the
meetings of January 2 and 16, 1996. Sybill moved to approve the Consent Agenda, and
the motion was seconded by Kevin. A vote was taken and.passed unanimously, 7-0. .
The therd item on the agenda was Resolution No. 4, Series of 1996, a Resolution
Extending the Present Term of the Design Revievu Board. Tom Moorhead expfained that
the terms of Hans Woldrich and Robert Borne, had expired on February 1, and it vvas
~ necessary to reappoint fihem in order for the February DRB meetings to be conducted with
a quorum. Tom further explained that sta4f was recommending the Council pass Resolution iVo. 4, Series of 1996 un4il new DRB Members could be svvorn in on Niarch 6. A motion wras
made by Paul to approve Resolution No. 4, with a second from Mike Jewett. A vote was
then taken and passed. unanimously, 7-0.
Fourth on the agenda was Resolution iVo. 5, Series of 1996, a Resolution Agreeing to
Indemnify Stewart Title for Attorneys Fees. Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead, presented the
item, stating that pursuant to the agreement with Ci4y Market, i4 was the obligation of the
Tovun of Vail to provide title insurance. In the event such title insurance was no4 available
it vvas the obligation of the Town of Vail to bring a declaratory judgment action to resolve
any issues concerning the Town's authority to enter into the previously executed
agreement. Tom said 4ha4 upon review of the agreement and the authority of the Town 40
enter into the same, Stewart Title believed that the actions taken were appropriate and
consistent vvith Town of Vail ordinances, its Charter and Colorado law. However, Tom
stated, obtaining title insurance would require an agreement that the Town of Vail v+rould
share any cost of defending such a lawsuit. Tom stated that such an agreement was
reasonable and v?rould relieve the Town of Vail of the obligation to presently bring a
declaratory judgment ac4ion to remove any potential of a lawsuit being fifed by the
"Common Sense fior the Commons" Petitioner's Committee. Tom fur4her stated that the
stafF recommendation was to pass the resolution, which would authorize the Town
Manager to enter into an agreement with Stewart Title to share attorneys fiees and cosfs
in the event a cause of action was brought by the "Common Sense for the Commons"
1 Town Council Evenong Meeting 02106196
f.
Petitioner's Committee challenging the authority of the Town of Vail to enter into the
agreement with City Market. A motion was made by Sybill to approve Resolution No. 5,
Series of 1996, with a second from Paul. Mike stated he didn't participate in an earlier
executive session because of his involvement with the Common Sense for Commons
Committee, but said he would vote on the issue. Sybill questioned whether the time frame
for a lawsuit had passed, and Tom stated that the review period for a court action in district
court challenging the project as arbitrary and capricious had passed. Mayor Armor
questioned whether it was appropriate for cauncil member Mike Jewett to vote on the .
issue. Tom addressed the question, stating it Mike Jewett's responsibility to disclose any
conflict of interest he might have. Mike said after studying documents he received from the
Secretary of State's office he was confident he did not have a conflict and stated he was
cleariy'opposed to the project. A vote was taken and passed 6-1, Mike Jewett voting in
opposition. Item number five on the agenda was an appeal to the Town Council, pursuant to Section
18.62.070 of the Municipal Code, of the Planning and Environmental Commission decision
to deny the Koenig driveway grade request, for a residence currently under construction
on Lot 26, Potato Patch SubdivisionR95 Potato Patch Drive. Town Planner, George Ruther
presented the item, and provided the following background: On January 8, 1996, the
applicanYs representative rriet with the Planning and Environmental Commission, ("PEC"),
requesting a driveway grade variance for a residence under construction at 795 Potato
Patch Drive, in accordance with Chapter 18.62, Variances, of the Municipal Code (see
attachment 1). Upon review of the requested variance, a motion was made to deny the
applicanYs request since the PEC could not make the findings necessary to grant approval
of a variance (see attachment 2). The motion passed unanimous4y (4-0). A letter from the
applicant's representative, Eric Johnson, dated January 17, 1996, appealing the PEC
decision, was reviewed (see attachment 3). In the applicant's letter, he referred to Section
17.28.030, Design Criteria, as being the section of the Municipal Code from which he was
seeking relief. Specifically, the applicant was seeking relief from the maximum grade for
heated ci.riveways (12%). In this appeaV, the applicant wished to be permitted a heated drivewaywith afinished grade of 14.1 A copy of the memorandum prepared by staff to
the PEC on January 8, 1996, was attached for reference (see attachment 4). George
' reviewed the three findings as outlined in the variances section of the Town Code. Town
Engineer, Greg Hall, said maximum grades for both heated and unheated driveways were
adopted and_that not more than 12°lo was allowed. Project Architect; Eric Johnson,
addressed the Council, stating the biggest concern should be the safety issue. He said the
Fire Department had reviewed the site and issued a letter of support. Mr. Johnson then
presented a survey of the property and expressed his feeling that more hardship would be
caused on the property if the driveway were not allowed as requested. Contractor, Ray
Kutash, and owner of Beehive Construction, reviewed the details of the heated driveway
and explained how the survey error had occurred. He felt the survey error constituted a
hardship, and that allowing the variance would not be detrimental to public health or safety
and reiterated the fire department's approval of the request. Project engineer, Jerry Law,
informed Council that it would be safer to allow the driveway to remain as is. He then
reviewed possible solutions and presented a diagram of the project. Councilman Ludwig
K'urz asked if the 12% grade could have been adhered to, and the applicant stated that it
could have been in compliance had the surveying error not occurred.. Paul Johnston said
that if the owner of the property would be willing to indemnify the Town of Vail against any
emergency or accidents, he would have no problem overturning the decision. George
explained that the applicant would be willing to indemnify the town, but felt strongly that the
agreement should be recorded, as future owners might not be willing to comply. Tom
Moorhead said he'd not heard of such an indemnification running with the iand. Paul
Johnston moved to overturn the decision of the PEC, conditionaf upon the owner of the
property indemnifying the Town of Vaii. The motion was seconded by Sybill Navas. Mike
Jewett was concerned that vehicies might end up parking on the street if they couldn't get
up the driveway, and Ludwig Kurz commented that he would be in favor of Paul's motion
. for two reasons: 1) the percentage by which the grade was in excess was minor, and 2)
because the applicant did not intentionally go over the allowable grade. Sybill stated she
2 Town Council Evenong Meeting 02106196
~
a
~
7
would vote in fiavor, bu4 felt it unfiortunate 4hat many designs are being built at the absolute
maximum allov?rances vvi4hout leaving room for possible error. Rob agreed, suggesting
applicants needed to allow for a contingency. A vote vvas taken and passed; 4-3, Mike,
Sybill, Paul and Ludvvig in favor; iVlayor Armour, Rob Ford and Kevin Foley voting in
opposi4ion.
Tom Moorhead asked if it was a requiremenfi that the indemnification agreement be
reeorded with the Counfiy Clerk & Recorder, and council members agreed that it was a
. condition of the motion fihat the owners of the property execute an indemnifica4ion
agreement with the Town of Vail, and fiurther, 4hat the agreement must be executed and
recorded wi4h the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to issuing a T.C.O. for
the east-half of the duplex.
The s6xth item on the agenda vuas a report from the Tovvn Manager. Bob McLaurin gave
an update on the railroad abandonment projecf and asked Council fio allocate $4,000 from
councii contingency to assist Eagle County with legal fees associated with the project.
Paul Johnston moved.to approve the $4,000 contribution and the motion v?ras seconded
by Sybill Navas. A vote vuas taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Bob then invified council members to attend an appreciation luncheon fior Tovvn of Vail employees the follovving day, to thank tovun crevus fior their hard vvork during January's
record snow fall.
There being no further business, Rob moved for adjournment. The motion was second by
Ludwig and the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTEST:-
Holly L. iVicCutcheon, Town Clerk (Names of certain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
3 Town Council Evenong Meeting 02106196
~
2/6/96 Town Council Meeting
R.A The next item on the agenda, Resolution No. 5, Series of 1996, a resolution directing the
Town Manager to enter to an agreement with Stewart Title Guaranty Company for
attorneys fees and costs.
RTM Mayor this relates to our agreements, for the development of Vail Commons which will
provide the public purpose of making housing available for local employees. Pursuant to
our contracts the Town has an obligation to provide title insurance. Based upon threats of
litigation that it had been previous brought by the Common Sense for the Commons
Petitioners Committee, Stewart Title is willing to provide the title insurance up to the
amount of $20 million for the improvements on the property with the agreement that the
Town of Vail would share attorneys fees and costs for any cause of action that was
brought by the Common Sense of the Commons Petitioners Committee. I believe that
that is a reasonable request by Stewart Title and would recommend passage of this
resolution. RA Thank you Tom. Is there any public input on this? If not, is there a motion for
discussion.
SN I move for approval of Resolution No. 5.
PJ Second.
RA So moved by Sybill, seconded by Paul. Is there any further discussion?
MJ I'll discuss.
RA Yes.
MJ. We've had a couple of , we had an executive session today where basically, and I don't
really think that that was privileged what we were talking about specifically, but I think
that for the sake of , for my interest I think that I should mention that I did not participate
in the actual executive session that concerned the commons because I have been a
- - participant with the Common Sense for the Commons Committee, which of course is
against this particular project. And as I've been out of Town for a week and I'm not sure
of the current status of where they're going with this, my understanding is that they did
want to pursue some type of legal action, but since I have been extremely close to this I
did remove myself from the meeting today. I felt that the conflict was really not because
I am an employee of Safeway but I wanted to bring it out in the open that it was because
of my participation as a member of the Common Sense for the Commons Committee. As
far as the voting on this particular issue I guess I've got a choice to make, I can either
abstain, or I can make a move to vote. .What I think would do on this particular case is
~
because I do not know for sure if there is action, I will vote on this particular issue, with
the understanciing that I have not participated in executive session participation. Thank
you.
RA Further discussion.
SN Did, Tom did you just (inaudible) sorry, I know it was mentioned earlier that the time
frame for a lawsuit has passed... RTM For certain lawsuits Sybill, for a lawsuit that would be brought pursuant to Rule 106,
which provides for District Court review of any action of Town Council as to whether it
would be arbitrary and capricious, that time has passed.
. SN Thank you.
RA Tom your, and I ask for legal advice on Mike's decision to vote on this, is it appropriate
or should he recuse himself. TRM Mike had previously stated to me that he had a conflict of interest in regard to any issues
dealing with the Vail Commons. Other than that he and I have had no discussion in
regard to this. Whether or not he has a conflict is something that falls within his decision
making process. It's not for me to say whether or not Mike Jewett has a conflict in this _
matter. MJ I think that if I can respond to that. My concern originally, and I'm not an attorney so I
, don't want to intezpret law, but the way I was reading the documents that were provided
plus what I've picked up from the Secretary of State's Office was that there was a need
for like a monetary gain and I didn't see any monetary gain on my part. Because at
Safeway, where I work, I' m very very high on the seniority list and so as far as layoffs
and that type,of thing I don't anticipate any problem. Where the conflict would arise now
' at this point is if the Common Sense for the Commons Committee did file a suit and I
was in an executive session where privy information was being divulged then in theory if
I'm part of that group then I would have that conflict with the Town of Vail. Now at the
same time I feel that I have, I represent a certain group of individuals within the Town of
Vail who are against this particular project and was voted into office for that particular
reason. There's going to be a varying degree depending on how that individual felt but
certainly I received enough votes to get elected and they knew my position clearly, that I
was against this particulaz project, not because of another grocery store but because of the
way this process was handled and the way it all came down. So, for that reason, there's
no monetary gain and so I feel comfortable voting.
RA Very good. Any further discussion? Is there a motion? (Inaudible) There is a motion on
the floor. All those in favor?
Aye.
~
~
RA Opposed?
MJ Aye.
RA I am in favor 6-1 with Mike Jewett being opposed to this.
ORDINANCE tJO. 4
Serses of 1996
AN ORDBNANCE AMERIDIIVC3 CiiAPTER 18.18, SEGT90N 18.18.090 DEfVSITY
CONTI20L, MED9l?M-DENSOTV NfL9LTIPLE-FAMfL.Y (nIIDIVIF) DISTRICT OF THE VAiL
Ml9NICBPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.18, Section 18.18.090, of the Vail iVlunicipal Code describes the
Density Control of the Medium-Density fVlultiple=Family Zone District; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1991, inadvertently omitted previously existing
language regarding density control; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has
recommended approval of the amendment to Chapter 18.18 of the Vail Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and
welfare to amend said Chapter of the fViunicipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIiVED BY THE TOWN COUiVCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1.
Chapter 18.18, Section 18.18.090, of the Vail iVlunicipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.18.090 Density control.
- A. Not more fifian thirty-five square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be
permitted for each one hundred square feet of buildable site area, provided however,
that single family and two-family dwelling units constructed in the fViedium Density
Residential District shall be entitled to an additional two hundred twenty-five square feet
of GRFA per constructed dwelling unit. Tofal density shall not eXCeedeighfeen dwelling
units~pe"r"~acre:of!builtlabfe:,site area.
(IVote: "REMAIIVDER OF SECTION REMAUVS UIVCHAIVGED")
Section 2.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason
held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and
each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact 4hat
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be dec{ared
invalid.
Section 3.
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and
proper for the heatth, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 4.
The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall
not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to
the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as
. commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision
hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded
unless expressly stated herein.
Section 5.
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE IN FULL, this 5th day of March, 1996. A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held
at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, on the 19th day of .
March, 1996, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THIS 19th DAY OF March, 1996.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
. ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
f:\everyone\ord\ord4.96
I
ORDgNANCE NO. 6
SERIES OF 1996
lFIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
TOWN OF ~AIL E1!'di'~OYEES' PENSIOTd PLAN
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail adopted, effective September 20, 1983, a qualified
money purchase pension plan known as the Town of Vail Employees' Pension Plan (the "Plan"),
for the purpose of providing retirement benefits for certain of its employees; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has amended from time to time the Plan, and
restated the Plan to incorporate all prior amendments and other changes required by law effective
January 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail desires to further amend the Plan to clarify certain
administrative issues that arose in the request for determination from the Internal Revenue
Service. -
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1) Section 4.1, Contributions bv the Employer for Full-Time Regular
Emplovees, the last two (2) sentences shall be deleted.
4 1-- Contributions bY the Employer for Fu11-Time Regular
Emplo,Kees. .
The Employer shall contribute and pay into the
Trust Fund for each pay period to the credit of the
Employer Contributions Account of each Participant who is
a Full-Time Regular Employee an amount equal to 11.15%
of such Participant's compensation for such pay period
- - during the first year of emplo.yment and 16.15% of such
Participant's compensation thereafter. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the rate of contribution of any such employee
, whose date of employment with the Employer was prior to
June 1, 1986 will remain at 17.6%. The Employer shall
make payment of its contribution for each pay period in one
sum as soon as practical after the end of such pay period.
Such contribution shall be made in cash. T'-e eo--*-:'-.
«4«....«4 4h,.«..4.. C.t..h .n<...b..4...« ..ed....+.on ..h..ll 1-...
,~FG1 GeTl PC
2) If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have
passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof,
regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
Ordinance No. 6, Saries of 1996
3) The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
4) The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal
Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has
accrued, any duty iinposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any
prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue
of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not
revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated
herein.
5) All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only.of such inconsistency. This repealer shall
not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore
repealed.
- INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE
IN FULL ON FIRST READING this Sth day of MarcH, 1996, and a public hearing shall be held
on this Ordinance on the 19th day of March, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Robert W. Arnlour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED tliis 19th day of March, 1996.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD96.6
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1996
4
_ ~
ORDONANCE N0. 10
Ser6es of 1996
AN oRDINANcE AMENDING SEcTIoN 2.24.020, MEMBERs-APPoINTMENrs-~~RMs
OF 11'PrIE PLANNING AND ENV9F20NMENTAL COMMISSION; SECTION 2.26.020 ARTS
Bp,4RD-APPOINTMENT; SECTaON 2.26.030 nllEllABERS-APPOIIVTMENTS-TERMS OF
TOW6d OF !lADL ARTS BOARD9 AND.SECTSON 18.54.020(B) BOARD ORGAIVIZAT10N.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Arts Board, and the Design
Review Board have inconsistent provisions regarding the date of the expiration of their members'
terms; and
WHEREAS, the Arts Board desires to increase the number of inembers participating on the
Board; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council is of the opinion that the amending of these sections to provide
for consistency of the expiration of the terms and to increase the number of the members of the Art
Board would be in the public interest.
" fVOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUiVCIL OF THE TOWfV OF VAIL,
COLORADO, THAT:
1. Chapter 2.24 of the Vail Municipal Code is amended as follows:
2.24.020 Members-Appointments-Terms. The planning and environmental
commission shall have seven members appointed by the town council. All members of
the commission shall be residents, qualified electors of the town, and if any member
ceases to reside in the town, membership on the commission shalf immediately
terminate.
All theif
,
. The terms of the members of the planning and environmental
" commission shall be for two years on an overlapping basis and shall expire on iVlay 1 st
of the year of termination.
2. Chapter 2.26 of the Vail Municipal Code is amended as follows:
2.26.020 Arts board - Appointment. The town council hereby appoints the Town of Vail
Arts Board composed of ekj4# eleven members shall act in accordance with the
charter, this chapter, the direction of the town council, the ordinances of the Town of
Vail, and shall be appointed and serve as provided in this chapter. ,
1 Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1996
' - - PL
2.26.030 Members - Appointrrients - Terms. The arts board shall consist.of eig44
eleuen members appointed by the town council which shall include 94.x eigh# members at large, one
town council member, snd one planning and environmental commission member anci one„desi gn
review board merrib"er: In addition, the arts board may consist of honorary advisory members who
shall not have the power to vote on issues which come before the board. The number and term of
such advisory members shall be at the discretion of the town council. All members of the arts board
shall be individuals who have demonstrated expertise in architecture, art criticism, art education, art
,
. history,.foreign arts, graphic arts, interior design, landscape architecture, town planning, or other art
and design related fields, or who have demonstrated a strong interest in the visual arts and civic
improvement. All;members shall either be residents of the Town of Vail, or own property within the
Town of Vail. The terms of the eight members at 1a,rge ;of the arts board shall be #ef three years on an
overlapping ~basis and: shall:"expire on May'1 tt'of the year of termination~
3. Chapter 18.54 of the Vai1 Municipal Code is amended as follows:
18.54.020 Board organization.
` A. (No change).
B. The terms of office for the four members at large shall be two years _on an
overlapping basis and shall expire on FebFusryf May, 1st of the year of
termination. The ferm of office for the planning and environmental commission
member shall be three months.
C. (No change).
D. (No change).
. E. (No change). ,
4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each
part, section, subsection, sentence, clause.or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
~
more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants
thereof. `
6. The amendment of any provision of the Vail IVlunicipal Code as provided in this
ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred
2 Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1996
d
4 prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as ,
commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby
shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly
stated herein.
7. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith
are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, orcler, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
IfVTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READIIVG, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED OiVCE IfV
FULL, this 19th day of March, 1996. A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular
meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, on the 2nd day of April, 1996, in the
Municipal Building of the Tov?rn.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon; Town Clerk ,
IIVTRODUCED, READ,-ADOPTED ARID ENACTED ON SECOND READIIVG AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE OiVLY) THIS DAY OF , 1996.
Robert W. Armour, Niayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
3
e
ORDINANCE NO. 8
Series of 1996 AN ORDINAfVCE REPEALLING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE (VO. 7, SERIES OF 1994,
TO ALLOW FOR THE COIVSTRUCTIOiV OF A TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSIIVG UNIT IN THE
CORNICE BUILDING; TO AMEIVD THE DEVELOPMERlT PLAiVS FOR SPECIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 32 IiV ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL fViUNICIPAL CODE; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD
THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail fUlunicipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Todvn in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS, the developer, David Smith, or the successors in interest, has submitted an
application for the iVlajor Amendment of Special Development Dis4rict (SDD) fVo. 32, for a
certain parcel of property uvithin the Town, legally described in the attached Exhibit A, and
commonly referred to as the Cornice Building Special Development District No. 32; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on February 12, 1996, held a public hearing on the Major Amendment of an SDD,
and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and
beneficial to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to amend SDD iVo. 32; and
WHEREAS, the Major Amendment to the approved development has been reviewed
pursuant to Section 18.40.100 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. •
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter .18.66 of
the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. iVOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIiVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTIOiV 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development
Districts in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
SECTIOfV 2
Special Development District iVo. 32 is established to ensure comprehensive
development and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character
of the Town, provide adequate open space, employee housing, and other amenities, and
promote the objectives of 4he Town's Zoning ordinance. The developmen4 is regarded as
f:\everyone\ord\ord8.96 1
;complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental
Commission, and there are significant aspects of the specia{ development which cannot be
satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No. 32 is established for the development on a parcel of .
land comprising 3,659 square feet in the Vail Village of the Town; Special Development District
No. 32 and said 3,659 square feet may be referred to as "SDD No. 32".
r
SECTION 4
The Town Council finds that the development plan for SDD. No. 32 meets each of the
standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail or
demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040,
the development plan for SDD No. 32 is approved. The development plan is comprised of
those plans submitted by David William Haase Associates, and consists of the following
` documents:
1. Sheet No. 1, dated February 23, 1994 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. 2, dated February 12, 1996 (landscape plan). .
3. . Sheet No. 3, dated February 12, 1996 (west building elevation).
4. Sheet No. 4, dated February 12, 1996 (south building elevation).
5. Sheet No. 5, dated February' 12, 1996 (north building elevation).
6. Sheet No. 6, dated February 12, 1996 (east building efevation).
7. Sheet No. 7, dated February 12, 1996 (garage level " 1 " floor plan).
8. Sheet No. 8, dated January 24, 1994 (bedroom level "2" floor p{an).
9. Sheet No. 9, dated January 24, 1994 (great room level "3" floor plan). 10. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Special Development District.
SECTION 5 in addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 4 above, the
following development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental
Commission for its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town
Cauncil; these standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the
integrity of the development of SDD No. 32; the following are the deveVopment standards for
f:\everyone\ord\ord8.96 2
B
a
SDD iVo.'32;
A. Lot Area - The lot area shall consist of approximately 3,659 square feet.
B. Setbacks - The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans. .
C. Height - The maximum height of the Cornice Building shall not exceed 33 feet
and shall be as dimensioned on the Approved Development Plans.
. D. Density Control - The maximum GRFA for the Cornice Building shall not exceed
2,387 square feet (2,000 square feet for the single-family unit, 387 square feet for the employee
unit). This figure is the maximum GRFA that will be allowed on the lot. An additional 250
square feet of GRFA, per Chapter 18.71 of the Vail Niunicipal Code, shall not be allowed on this
site, now or in the future. A 600 square foot credit for a tvvo-car garage shall be allowed in
addition to the 2,387 square feet of GRFA allowed on the site. The approved density for the
Cornice Building shall be one and one-half dwelling units (one single-family dwelling and one
' Type III Employee Housing Unit). ,
E. Site Coverage - The maximum site coverage for this Special Development
District shall not exceed 1,397 square feet, or 38% of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on
the Approved Development Plans..
F. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved
Development Plans.
G. Lighting - All outdoor lighting shall be in accordance with the approved
Development Plan.
SECTION 6
The developer, jointly and severally, agrees with the following requirements, which are a
part of the Town's approval of the Major Amendment of SDD Rlo. 32:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a demolition/building permit for the
redevelopment project, the developer shall identify the location of three permanently restricted
employee housing units, which provide a minimum of three kitchens. The units shall be located
within the Town of Vail limits, close to a Town of Vail bus route and be rented at reasonable
market rates. The units shall always comply with the Town of Vail housing ordinance
requirements specified in Chapter 18.57 (Employee Housing) of the Vail Municipal Code, as
may be amended from time to time. The proposal for acceptance of the employee housing
f:\everyone\ord\ord6.96 3
~
units shall be brought back to the Town Council for their review and approvaf at a regularly
scheduled meeting, as a condition of the issuance of a demolition/building permit. The three
units`shall be deed restricted and available for occupancy before a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy is issued for the Cornice Building. Upon receipt and recordation of a written
agreement to permanently restrict the three off-site employee housing units in compliance with
Chapter 18.57 (Employee Housing) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, and upon issuance of a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy fvr the redeveloped Cornice Building, the owner shall be
. released from all obligations contained in the employee housing agreement dated May 2, 1985,
by and between the Town of Vail and the owner of the Cornice Building, its heirs, successors
and assigns.
2. The applicant shall provide a drainage easement to the Town in order to provide
for the maintenance of the existing storm water drainage system located on the western edge
of this property. The location and width of the easement will be determined by the Town
Engineer.
` 3. The applicant, or his assigns; agrees to be responsible for the maintenance of all
landscaping on Town property, as indicated on the approved landscape plan, for a period of
three years. If any vegetation dies during the thcee year period, it shall be replaced by the
property owner at the time, at his/her expense.
4. A revocable right-of-way permit shall be obtained for all improvements on public
property. ~
5. The applicant, or his assigns, agrees that the Empioyee Housing Unit shall not
be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the single-family unit.
6. All approvals for outdoor lighting previous to the Major Amendment are null and
void (i.e., entrance gate).
7. The use of the driveway for on-site parking shall be limited to loading, delivery
' and other short-term parking only. In the event that the Town of Vail staff determines that the
driveway is being used for permanent parking, the Town Council may, at their discretion,
impose additional conditions or restrictions regarding on-site surface parking. It is the intent of
this SDD that on-site parking be accommodated within the garage.
8. No interior access shall exist between the single-famiiy unit and the employee
unit.
SECTION 7
f:\everyone\ord\ord8.96 4
a
S
Amendments to fihe approved development plan shall be reviewed pursuant to Section
18.40.100 of the Vail fViunicipal Code.
SECTION 8
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three
(3) years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project. The developer must meet the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the iVlunicipal Code
of the Tovvn of Vail.
SECTION 9
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, cfause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it vvould have passed this ordinance, and
each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared
invalid.
` SECTIOiV 10
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTiON 11
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail IVlunicipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution cammenced, nor any
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or
any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
IiVTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READIfVG, APPROVED, AIVD ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE 1N FULL ON FIRST READIfVG this 5th day of March, 1996, and a public
hearing on this Ordinance on the 19th day of March, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Bob Armour, Mayor
f:\everyone\ord\ord8.96 5
!
e
Attest:
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECONQ READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
in full this 29th day of March, 1996.
Bob Armour, Mayor
Attest:
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
f:\everyone\ord\ord8.96 6
r
1 EXHBBET A
Cornice Building, 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows:
A part of tract "B" and a part of Mill creek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, state
of Colorado, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the iVortheast corner of Vail Village, First Filing; thence fVorth 79°46'00" West
along the Southerly line of U.S. Highway iVo. 6 a distance of 367.06 feet to the Northeast corner
of said Tract "B"; thence South 10°14'00" West along the Easterly line of said Tract "B"; a
distance of 198.31 fee4 to the Southeasterly corner of said Tract "B"; thence iVorth 79°46'00"
West along the Southerly line of said Tract "B" a distance of 100.00 feet to the true point of
beginning thence north 09°10'17" West a distance of 41.67 feet; thence South 88°27'11" West
, a distance of 75.21 feet; thence South 27°13'37" East of distance of 77.37 feet; thence North
57°24'00" East a distance of 55.11 feet, more or less to the true point of beginning.
f:\everyone\ord\ord8.96 7
Vail Is~odates Real Estate rou s lnco
..e...........ae...e.......a.
March 19, 1996 ~ o
~
Mr. Jim Cumutte
Senior Planner .
Tawn of Vail
1301 Vai.l Valley I7rive
Vail, Co 51659
VIA FACSIMILE 479-2452
ItE: Proposed Amendment to Golden Peak Operatiortal ?Vlanagement Plan
L?ear Jim:
Vail Associates has conYinued to market the first and second tier parking
anemberships for the Golden Peak base facitity parking structure since the Council's '
approval o€ Llie project in December. VJe have successfully marketed all of the 75
£zrst tier memberships; buY have o7ly sald 16 of the second tier memberships. As
you may recalls the second tier consists of up to 450 memberships, 200 of which
were contemplated for the #irst offering to tr.a publie.
9av9bpcn of var(
8"M'C'Efk°RP"'% CZearly the market recceptian ~ the two memberships has been strongly vv~eighted in
Rrrowhead"and
9ache7orGUnAVillage" fa`'Og Of th~'i "gUarSI]t$6'Cl" IJaIlCITIg space of the tier one membership. T18 ObjeCtioX1
zo the tiEr twa membership is tiha4 the member can not atways be assured that a space
is available for them and lacking tha± assuranee they c3o not wish to substandally
invest in the anembership which would pay for the garking structure. Criven this
maakgt objection to the second tier product Vaii :Sssociates p:oposes amending the
Golden Peak Qperational 1tilanaDerrient Plan to previde for up to 600 members, an
increase of 75 memlxr, from the cuirent 525 permitted. In t,ddition, the applicant
proposes that the first tier could censist of up to 150 members who have a right to
pazk in an identified, reserved parlQng space. In effect what we are proposing is ?hat
the opsrational management pla.n allow far both types of parking memberships, the
tieA ane and the tier twoA but that the marketplace would determine the mix of these
memberships fypes and that theoretically a110£ the spaces could be sold as tiez one
rnemberships.
Y.1
i•:::
~
reia. et+nl aIn
137 @enchmark Road aP0 Box 959. Avon, Co"crado 0 81620 o phone 970 845 2535 a fax 970 545 2555
, . . ~nnv~ • -3 • ;J • t-i • n i.tHCC • T T Q~ . r-T ?I4.1
. ~
m
ZVir. Jim Curnet4e
March 19, 1996
Page 2
The applicant understands and presumes th.at the Town's concerri with the pogential
increase of tieP one memberships will be the utilization of the spaces. Vail
Assocfates likewise does nat wish Yo invest a very significant suin of money an this
parldng structure and have the spaces starid idle. However, we anticipate utilization
of the spaces; wbether tieY one og tier two will be quite highh. We have conducted a
survey of the existing tier one members and of the 36 members responding, 33, or
91%, indir-ated that they would ei#her be frequen4 users of the facility themselves or
would participate in a rental pool and place their parking spaces into the pool for use
in their absence by the public under our operational management. Only 3 of the 36
resgonden#s (9%) said they were not interested in participating in a rental pool.
Vail Associates further groposes Zo amend the Golden Peak (?perational
Management Plan to explicitly provide foY the creatiora of a rental pool program for
the first tieP parldng memberships. We propose adding ihe following language to
paragraph 2, page 7, beginning with the following as the third sentence;
The first tier members will be incented to place their parking space in a rental
pool program available to guests, mexaibers of the skiing public, employees,
or- other persons who must call arid reserve available spaces ira advance. 1'lae
first tin meanbers parucipating in this prograrn would advise or notify the,
ckub manager of those times or occasions when they would not be using their
parking space and it would be available for rental by reseavation. T}ae
proceeds from the first tier rental progrann wou]d be spl'at so that 54% of the
revenues achieved would go directly 4o the mexnber's account offsetting their
dues and 50% would go to the operating expenses of the Golden Peak
Pssport Clubhouse, indirectly offsetting or reducuzg the dues requirements
of the members. Vail Associates as managex of ihis f$cility will directly .
maxket these available parking spaces 'to parents of the Golden Peak
Cl~drens Ski School prograara, parents of DEV'O and other special programs
paricipan4s, private ski lesson customers and identifiable front range gacsts.
Begin.ning ia the 1996197 ski season ski school clients will be able to phone
in reservations for the ski school' and through a camputerized reservation
syman Vail Assoeiates will offer daily parking in the Golden Peak structure
fra= the pool to these cusfoaners and guests and will provide a phone number
forp.arking reservations available to the publie.
. ~
. r.i.e-. ? i u x i urr^ . T T n~ L T ~ILII 1
• ~
N[r. Jirn Cuxne4te
March 19, 1996 Page 3
The cmrr.bination of frequent use by fust tier members, the fnmcial incentives to
paol available spaces into a rental program, and the direct Ynarketing effa:ts for these
pooled spaces should resWt in higl3 ueilization of the first tieg spaces.
'Fhe cgeation of the underground parkiag s4xucture has always be€n a unique and
cemplacated component of the Golden Peak development plan. A number of
plaaning and development goals hinge on the success of this unique structure and its
management. The neighborhood has soughht a cantrolled access underground
structure to reduce traffic volumes, adverse traffic impacts and visual clutter in the
neighborhood, ilail Asseciates has favored the concept of this structurg to achieve
this ka$'fic control, as well as to increase the site surface areas available for skier
d.rop-aff, skier and pedestrian ci.rculatioa, and green space. T`he orily complicatilag
factor for Vail Associates has been the creation of a mechanism to pay for this
extraoxdi.nary parking solufion. The Town's goals have been to insure that there is
no net loss of physical parking spaces nor a reduction in utilization of these parking
spaces that would be equivalent to a net loss of parking available to the public. It is
our belief that the proposed amendments to the 4perational Management Plan will
continue to zrteet these multiple goals of conttolliag traffic, increasing the site surface
area fog otheY beneficial uses, and achieving high utilization of the parking '
coustraaatad. We therefore request the Council's approvai of this proposed revision
to the Operational Management plan. VerY trwY,
VAII, ASSOCIATES, LNC. .
bavid G. Corbin
Vice Fresident of I7evelopment
ec: Jim Larnont, EVHOA
DGC:it
nn~ in u• n I i_J."Arw . 7 T OC C T ~1L11.1
'CHe YASSPORT CLUDNO41Sg
si
GOLDEV 1'EAK
Charter Mersber Utiiizatian Survey
03/1&196 11:54 AM
An informal phone survey of 7; Chert.er raembers' expezted utilzzation of their designated parking space at
the Pzssport Clubhouse at Golden Peak was conducted during the period of Mazch 4- 15, 1996. The
survey produced Yhe fo.lowing resuits:
0 93 Charter Members
0 36 responding 49 % re:ponse rate)
0 33 will be frequent users or would participate in a rer.tal pool concept for the followine reasons:
o front eaage residenu
o second homeowners ifl'Vail Valley
o living in Vail Val!ey
0 community awareFess of parking ava;lability
o"s are not intares4@d in participadng in a rental pool
Percentage of utiliaation for the respoadiag saanplg of members - 33 af 36 = 9fl i°/a
Frequent use was described as utilization of a designated perking space:
o multiple uss during the week and over the weekends
o warm season use for various activities:
o Bravo attendance
o Vitlage shopging
o Kestaurant dining in the Village or at Passpo:t Clubhouse trroughout the yezr
276 i1ANSON itANC!-i RO.4D Pci. Wx 7 va:!, c.:i 4f634 97(1-479.9000 ('nX 9YU-479-6010
i+. inn~ic~ •~•~•u•e r.r._~-r r~ rT
,rYg i~A55PORT CLUbHquSB
a+
GOLI7EN YF..4K
CHARYER PASSPORT RENTAL PbOI. PROGRAM
DeacPi$tinn : Cbarter Passport holders will ba incented to place their pa-kiag space in a rental pool program available to guests of
Vail Mountain.
RentAt Prooram _wJtaLeket:
Children's ski school parents, DP-VQ parenis, private lessons; snd Fron4 Katige Quests:
n Startina in k,e 1996/97 ski season, si:i school clients will lx zble to phone in their reservations. At the rime of
confirmarion, they ean be prompted on whether wey.would like to have pa,*king space zt Golden Peak for the
day of their Iessen; subject to availability of spaces in the rental pool fox that day. Incentives to_Josa I3ental Prn am: o All proceads from the rental program will bs split as follows:
0 50% goes dhctly to member's accoun: offsotting their annual dues
0 50% gees to tbe Passport Clubhouse, indirectly offseuiag dues
o Mora personaliaed servicelbetter manaaement of parkzno spaces o Community-8inded
nerRtional/iAanagement T'0etics
o Computer reservatioas system, sirnilar to a golf zee time oP hotel reservation system.
o Users can e311 ia using 4]te phone key pad to type in alenu ehoice5. They wilt receive eonfirmetion of a
psrking space or they will leave a telephoae au.*nber for the waitlist.
o The system will assi?n parkin.z on a$rst come. first serve basis tivrth the ah:litv to t+rioritire users based o-i
usnge frequency, o The 5ystem will haadle Sigr?ature membershxp reservarions as well as Rantal Pool reservarions.
278 1',A.'VSUN FANe;-i :tU.Sn ro. Gox 7Vq:l.. Co) 81659 970-479•6000 r•ax 970-+9').80I0
q ' A ~nnv~ •-3 •v•W •n i.i~rr•~T oc cr ]1HI.1
6
dd
e4
TOWN 0F VAIL
75 South Frontage Road Offcce of the Town Attorney
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2107/Fax 970-479-2157
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: R. Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney
DATE: March 19, 1996
,
RE: Employee Housing Unit 5B at lnnsbrook Meadows Subdivision
On May 17, 1994 the Innsbrook Meadows Subdivision received approval for a rezoning from
Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family Residential and a major
subdivision. The development consists of 14 buildings, 19 dwelling units, and the developer
agreed to provide four employee housing units in the project. (Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1994
attached)
An "Employee Housing Unit" (EHU) means a dwelling unit which shall not be leased or rented
for any period less than thirty consecutive days, and shall be rented only to tenants who are full
` time employees in Eagle County. A"full time" employee shall mean a person who works a
minimum of an average of thirty hours per week. (18.04.105). The EHU's at the innsbrook IVleadows Subdivision are Type III which are permitted in multiple
family and .mixed use zone districts. They shall have a GRFA of not less than 450 sq. ft. and
not more than 900.sq. ft. and no more than two bedrooms. No more than two persons for each
bedroom located therein shall reside in a Type III EHU. A Type lll EHU may be rented or it may
be sold, transferred or conveyed, separately from other dwelling units or employee housing
units that may be located on the same {ot. (18.57.060).
If sold the EHU rrTUSt be used by the owner of the EHU as a permanent residence. A
permanent residence shall mean the home or place in which one's habitation is fixed and to
which ane, whenever he or she is absent, has a present intention of returning atter a departure
or absence therefrom, regardless of the duration of the absence. In determining what is a
permanent residence, the Town staff shall take the following circumstances relating to the
owner of the residence in account' business pursuits, employment, income sources, residence
for income or other tax purposes, age, marital status, residence of parents, spouse and children
if any, location of personal and real property, and motor vehicle registration. (18.57.060 B. 11.
a.). .
RECYCLED PAPER
~
If a Type III EHU is sold its tenant must be a full time employee who works in Eagle County. A full time employee is one who works an average of a minimum of thirty hours each week.
(18.;57.060 B. 12. and 18.57.020 C.)
No later than February 1 st of each year, the owner of a Type I I I Employee Housing Unit within
the town shall submit a report establishing that the employee housing unit is occupied by a
tenant who is a full time employee in Eagle County. (18.57.020 E.)
A copy of the Deed Restriction that pertains to the employee housing units at the Innsbrook
Meadows Subdivision is attached. '
Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type III EHU, the perspective purchaser shall
submit an application to the Community Development Department documenting that the
perspective purchaser meets the requirement of a tenant who is a full time employee in Eagle
, County and that it will be used by the owner of the EHU as a permanent residence. (18.57.060
B. 13) The affidavit attached pertains to the Innsbrook Meadows Subdivision, Unit 5B being
discussed at this time.
RTM/aw
attachments
I
h
a OFiDIidAPICE PlO. 5
SERIES OF 1994 '
AN ORDI@dAPlCE FiEZOP11PlG A 7RACT FROAA PRIMRFiY/SECOPIDARY RESIDEMTIAL,
SEC'TIOId 18.93 70 LOW DEhISITY RAULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SECTIOId 18.16
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2850 PfINNICKINNICK ROAD MORE SPECIFICALLY
DESCRIBED AS:
A pereel of land in the Southarest Ouerter of Section 74, Toamship 5 South, Range 81 West ot the 6th
Principal &fleridian, more pertfculerly described as tollows:
Beglnning at e point vuhence a brass cap set for a wimess comer for the dVest Ouarter of said Section 14,
bears (Worth 29 degrees 28 minutes 51 seconds West, 1073.08 feet Deed) (North 43 Degrees 15 minutes 02
seconds West, 915.96 feet Measured); Thence Plorth 74 degrees OS minutes 19 seconds East, 10.761eet;
Thence 183.62 feet along the arc ot a curve to the right which are subtends a. ehord bearing North 88 degrees
12 minutes 30 seconds East, 161.76 feeh Thence South 77 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds East, 62.77 feet;
Thence 147.43 feet along the arc of a curve to the left whleh are subtends e chord bearing Ptorth 86 degrees
36 minutes 17 seconds Eest, 145.60 feet; Thence Norlh 70 degrees 52 m)nutes 55 seconds East, 406.55 feet;
Thence 54.10 teet along the arc of a euroe to the rlght which are su6tenda e chord bearing South 47 degrees
20 minutes 37 seconds East, 44.20 feet; Thenee South 14 degrees ZS minutes 50 seconds West, 110.51 feet;
Thence South 68 degrees 1B minutes 91 seconds West, 320.00 feet;
Thence North 19 degrees 07 minutes OS seconds West, 50.00 feet;
Thence South 77 degrees 48 minutes 41 seconds West, 160.18 feet;
Thence South 10 degrees 53 minules 33 seconds West, 36.48 teet;
. Thence Alorth 87 degrees AO minutes OS geconds West, 337.72 feet;
Thence (Plorth 11 degrees 52 m{nutes 13 seconds Eest, 130.00 feet Deed) North 11 degrees 55 minutes 31
seeonds Eaet, 129.75 feet AAeasured) to the POIMT OF BEGIPINIPdG.
8earing hom G.LO. record for South halt ot Seclton line tsetween Sections 14•15. (G.LO. record South 01
degrees 30.2 minutes F.est) (South 01 degrees 38 minutes 32 seconds Eest AAeasured)
WHEREAS, the property located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road has been replatted to a
single lot from an unplatted parcel in accordance with Section 1720.030; and
WHEREAS, an application has been submitted to rezone the tot from
Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family Residential; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediate
adjacent properties; ` WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission had a pub{ic hearing on the proposed zoning amendment and has submitted its
recommendation to the Town Councii; and .
. . WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to plat restrictions which shall be recorded on the
plat at the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder prior to second reading which
stipulate how the future development shall occur; and
- WHEREAS, all notices required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
6ti'HEREAo, the Town Council has held a pubiic hearing as required by C;napter 18.66
of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT:
obinx= xo. s,
, sonoo m Ieea
~
;
Section 1
The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in Chapter 18.66 of the Municipa! Code of the Town of Vail have been fufly satisfied, and all of
the requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments
have been fully satisfied.
Section 2
The Town Council hereby rezones the property from Primary/Secondary Residential to.
Low Density Muiti-Family Residential.
Section 3
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
' this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance,
and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the tact
that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
invafid.
Section 4 .
The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safery, and weffare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
Section 5
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued,
' any duty imposed, any vioiation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any
prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by
virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not
revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly
stated herein.
Section 6
All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or .parts thereof, inconsistent herewith
are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
. ' oidin.m. Mo. S.
. s.rw a I ow
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL ON
a'
FIRST REAdING this 3rd day of May, 1994, and a public hearing shall be held on the 17th
day of May, 1994, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vaif,
Colorado.
Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
READ AiVD APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
BY TITLE OiVLY this 17th day of May, 1994.
• Margar A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hoily L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
- ~
C10RDBrS
. . ONlneneo ko. 5,
. soRoo a 1sPA
~
TYPE Ill EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
I / y~
WHEREA.S, ~S hltM &f~~ t)(2,)P~~.s the owner oi certain property ("the
Owner") described as: 1~~. ~,T S~~ ~,L~~•~l~ -i71~~ 1,-=-„ ~b~l~'.~~'=" ,,,JT
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions on the use of a unit or apartment
located on ihe Property tor the benefit of the Owner and the Town of Vail, Colorado ("the Town').
NOW. THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, es;ablish, acknowledge, declare for the
, benefit of all persons who may hereinaher purchase, or lease, or hold the subject land ihe foliowing
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the land and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, its respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
L7
e-~
1. Unit or Apartment containing IT& square feet, is hereby restricted as a ~
~
Type III Employee Housing Unit (EHU) which must comply with all the provisions of
Sections 18.57.020. 18.57.030, and 18.57.060 of ihe Vail Municipal Code as amended.
2. The Type III Empioyee Housing Unit shall be leased to tenants who are full-time
employees who work in Eagle Gounty. An EHU shall not be leased for a period less tfian
thirty consecuiive days. For ihe purposes of this section, a full-time employee is one who
works an average of thirty hours each week.
3. A Type lif EHU may be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from other dwelling units
or Employee Housing Units ihat may be located on the same lot or within ihe same
~ buiiding so long as it meets the following conditions:
aj h musi oe used'oy iiie owner oi ihe tiiLJ as a permanant residence. ror ihe
purpose of this Qaragraph, a permanent residence shall mean the home or place
in which one's habitation is fixed and to which one, whenever he or she is absent,
has a present intention of returning afier a departure or absence therefrom,
. regardless o( the duration of absence. In determining what is a permanent
residence, tfie Town staff shall take the following circumstances.relating to ihe
owner of ihe residence into account: business pursuits, employment, income
sources, res:dence for income or other tax purposes, age, marital status,
567260 B-671 P-242 07/13195 10:45A PG 1 OF 3 REC DOC
- Sara J. Fisher Eaqle County Clerk & Recorder 16.00
1
~
Q residence of parents, spouse and children if any, location of personal and real
property, an motor vehicle registration.
b) If a 7ype Ill EHU is sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the other
dwelling units and/ar Type III Employee Flousing Units in a mu{tifamily structure it
is apart oi, or from other dwelling urKS and/or Type III EHUs located on the same
lot, the 7ype Ill EHUs in the structure or on that lot shall be subject to all the
. provision set forth in Section 18.57.020.
4. The Type Ill EHU shall not be divided imo any form of timeshares, intervel ownership, ar
fractional fee ownership as those terms are defined in the Municipal Code of the Town of
vaii.
5. filo later than February 1 of each year, the owner of each employee housing unit writhin the
town which is constructed following the effective date of this chapter shall submit two
copies of a report on a form to be obtained from the Community Development Department,
' to the Community Development Departmerit of the Town of Vail and Cfiairman of the Town
G~
of Vai! Housing Authority setting forth evidence establishing that the employee housing unit P91
C~
has been rented throughout the year, the rental rate, the employer, and that aar.h tan*kn? ~
w
who resides within the employee housing unit is a full-time employee in Eagle County.
6. The owner of each EHU shall rent the unit at a monthly rentaf rate consistent whh or lower
~ than those market rates prevalent for similar properties in 1he Town of Vail.
G.
0
7. The Town of Vail Housing AuthOrity will determine the market rate based on the study af .
a mher units ot comparable size, location, quality and amenities throughout the Town. The
~ market rate shati be based on an average of a minimum of five rental rates of comparable
~
° units. If the unit is not rented and is not avaiiabie at the market rate it shall be determined
~
to be in noncompliance. In addition to any other pena{ties and restrictions provided herein,
- ~
~ a unii tound to be in noncompliance shali oe suoject to puolication as determined by ine
~
~ Housing Authority.
N
C
N
a 8. Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type III EHU, the prospective purchaser
~ shall submit an appfication to the Communiiy Development Department documenting that
~ .
• the prospective purchaser meets the criteria set forth above and shall includE an affidavit
affirming that he or she meets these criteria.
o .
cD
CQ
2
~
~
~
9. The provisions of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by the Owner and the
Town.
10. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements conlained herein shall not be
waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the
Town of Vail and the Owner of the property.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corpn;ation ~ By: .
Bob McLaunn, Town Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this `,L`r'''day of~ 199~
blic~
_ ili~ u
llnne E. MMgK fVotary puygc .
Comrmssfon Exi'ms 617-1999
" My commission expires:
BV:
Property ners
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 day of
< ~-Notary ublic ~
. • i j~
• My cortxnission expires: _ ~'/d •9~ ^ • r
. . T P < .
. . Cpf- `U~O~~~~. .
Y
r iA . f' , , , F:W~ryarVOrms~FJlUlll
567260 B-671 P-L42 07/13/95 10:45A PG 3~,, OF 3
. .
T
e
d
t~,...
•
. i.
:;i................... {
1
~
~.r
>:h
. "?F~ ~ r:},.:::: :w:::::::i::::::i:
.i
. fi
0
y./
•
/"SS`<i:<:'•i:~i:"`'i::r: ~%i'ik'':: ~~>~i:;~~.-.~i~:
i
`•.3..+c.
i
1 (
1 ~
J28/96
. Dear Andy,
I wish to state for the record that I%vork in Eagle County forty hours per week at AMR
Senrices and that I intend to use my Innsbruck Meadows unit as my primary residence.
Sincerely,
Peter Battin~
~
Peter Battin
,
Nota " ./~ci .'-v Yo.
G y~
,
o~ ~ C~~cL~; .
0
~
40-~
ooooo00 ~
- My C,Ommission Expires 1011911999
MAF2- 1 S-96 TUE 1 8= 2'9 P3
~~~~~ne o ugan9 roker
~
2642 Kinnickinnick Court 0 Vail, Colorado USA 81657
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3768 o Vail, Colorado USA 81658
- Town of Vail Town Counsf (970) 476-0764 - FAX (970) 476-2564
, Fax: 9'70 479-2157
;March 19, b 996 _
, ~ear Members:
gaete wreting to you concerning Pete BaYtin, a Town and County emptoyee, who is trying to buy
his fitst~ho~e, ~a4:Innsbruck IV~eadows. ~ mentioned his situation briefly, at the workshop on ~Iail Comrrions, at your. February meeting.
Pe2e called CoYnmmunity Development in January (I beiieve) to get the application to fil1 out for the
;Tovvn (per 480 the Type l 1 lEmptoyee Housing Covenant). The Town didn't have one but he
was:asked to. write a letter stating he worked in Eagie County. He did that but then, that wasn't
good.enough. ° He was asked to bring in a letter from his employer. Then that wasn't good.
enough; He was asked to prove he worked in Fagle County by bringing in his pay stubs. Then I
w~s$old by Aridy Kriutson that he didn't.make enough money. V4Then I expiained that most of his
~ income. came froYri tips ~ndy wanted proof of tha# in the form of a tax return. Pete doesn'~ show
that on a tax retum:: ~ mentioned Pete recently came into a trust. Andy told me the T'own didIA
:Warit.those type.of people in these employee units {just as one counsiiwoman expressed the same
, the vvorkshop meeting). Then the next ttung was, the'Town had to prove that Pete worked 30 .
`:houi5 a week so, again; verification of employment was provided by the employees and I believe,
. the L;ender involyed in this transaction. Andy Knutson then says Pete just made it qualifying on
Yhe hours worked (30.9) and the application was going to 'Il'om Moorehead for approval. Now,
~.to-day; l hearete is rejected because he doesn't qualify? IVow there is another guideline that has
' come up_,$hat requires 12 weeks of consecutive weeks of employmene (or something to that
e4~ect)?
:1Land Title faxed Yne this covenant Jan 31, 1996. 1 have read it. 1Vawhere have I found any
°reference to IPd#cliasers having to qualify with the 30 hours a week. #3a) only says that the owner
has to be a permaneht resident. #2 references tenants in Type 111 units must be full-time
:empYoyees arid vvork 30 hours a week (there is no mention of 12 consecutive weeks or wHat ever
: m,li/loorehead is now stating as patt of this covenant). Therefor, Pete qualifies unless this is
= the Towds way of keeping trustfunders out of these type of units? There are two types o£
`•1nastfianders. 'On~'s that dort't work and those who work, enjoy working and give to the
cami*mty. Pete is ehe latter.
i :
r; It. was; my undersYanding that the Town wanted to attract permanent residents baclc into the town
loosing permanent resident families to down valley due to no kids in `Iail and
sch.o,o? districts. V~il always attracted the singles but now I'm hearing that they prefer Avon to
;~..Yaal.' ~If you t?vanti to' agtract people back to Vail then you need to make it attractive to come back.
Cpiving people the nun around is not the way. It's hard, enough to find the right property to buy
:.'.then: have to go thcough the frustraiion of the loan application without having then to gp through
ttie third de0ee vvith the Town. And for what reason when the Covenant does not request all this
~
o, ,
Y"lAR- ,S <3-,9S TIJE f 8 - 28
I
proof (again #3 on the Covenant). I am advising Pete Battin to come before Town Gounsil and
request a hea.ring on this issue. Unfortunately, I have not been able to reach him to-day and I
lcriow he wiu riot be happy.as he has been waiting to close on this unit and has ordered
, Sincerely,.
SuelDugan
. < Copy to Pete gaitin
~ .
I
~
:
j : .
l
b
~
/d
eg
~'O~ OF ~AIL 75 South Frontage Road Off ce of the Town Attorney
Yail, Coloraclo 81657
970-479-2107/Faz 970-479-2157
MEMORAfVDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: R. Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney
DATE: fViarch 19, 1996
,
RE: Employee Housing Unit 5B at Innsbrook Meadows Subdivision
On May 17, 1994 the Innsbrook Meadouvs Subdivision received approva{ for a rezoning from .
Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family Residential and a major
subdivision. The development consists of 14 buildings, 19 dwelling units, and the developer
agreed to prov'ide four employee housing units in the project. (Ordinance iVo. 5, Series of 1994
attached)
An "Employee Housing Unit" (EHU) means a dwelling unit which shall not be leased or rented
for any period less than thirty consecutive days, and shall be rented only to tenants who are full
' time employees in Eagle County. A"full time" employee shall mean a person who works a
minimum of an average of thirty hours per week. (18.04.105).
The EHU's at the Innsbrook Meadows Subdivision are Type III which are permitted in multiple
famiVy and mixed use zone districts. They shall have a GRFA of not less than 450 sq. ft. and
not more than 900 sq. ft. and no more than two bedrooms. No more than two persons for each
bedroom located therein shall reside in a Type III EHU. A Type III EHU may be rented or it may
be sold, transferred or conveyed, separately from other dwelling units or employee housing
units that may be located on the same lot. (18.57.060).
~ If sold the EHU rrrust be used by the owner bf the EHU as a permanent residence. A
permanent residence shall mean the home or place in vuhich one's habitation is fixed and to
which one, whenever he or she is absent, has a present intention of returning after a departure
or.absence therefrom, regardless of the duration of the absence. In determining what is a
permanent residence, the Town staff shall take the following circumsfances relat+ng to the
owner of the residence in account: business pursuits, employment, income sources, residence
for income or other tax purposes, age, marital status, residence of parents, spouse and children
if any, location of personal and real property, and mator vehicle registration. (18.57.060 B. 11.
a.).
RECYCL,EDPAPER
(
If a Type III EHU is sold its tenant must be a full time employee who works in Eagle County. A
full time employee is one who works an average of a minimum of thirty hours each week.
(18.;57.060 B. 12. and 18.57.020 C.)
No later than February 1st of each year, the owner of a Type III Employee Housing Unit within
the town shall submit a report establishing that the employee housing unit is occupied by a
tenant who is a full time employee in Eagle County. (18.57.020 E.)
A copy of the Deed Restriction that pertains to the employee housing units at the Innsbrook Meadows Subdivision is attached.
Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type III EHU, the perspective purchaser shall
submit an application to the Community Development Department documenting that the
perspective purchaser meets the requirement of a tenant who is a full time employee in Eagle
. County and that it will be used by the owner of the EHU as a permanent residence. (18.57.060
B. 13) The affidavit attached pertains to the Innsbrook Meadows Subdivision, Unit 5B being
discussed at this time.
. . C.'-Y1
RTM/aw
lattachments
~
r
~ ORDINAPlCE PlO. 5
SERIES OF 1994
AW OF{D{PIANCE REZOIVIPIG 61 TRACT FROIIA NRIMARY/SECOPIDARY RESIDEPlTIAL,
SECTiOId 18.93 YO L01M DENSITY AAULZ'1-FAMILY FiESIDEtJTiAL, SECTf09d 18.16
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2850 OCINNICKINNICK ROAD MORE SPECIFICALLY
DESCRIBED AS:
A pareel of land fn the Southwest Ouarter ot Sectlon 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West cf the 6th
Principal 6a4erfdian, more perticularly described as tollows:
Beginning at e point whence a brass cap set for e witness corner ior the West Quarter of said Sectlon 14,
bears (Pdorth 29 degrees 28 minutes 51 seconds West, 1073.08 feet Deed) (North 43 Degrees 15 minutes 02
seconds West, 915.96 feet Measured); Thence Pdorth 74 degrees OS minutes 19 seconds Eest, 10.76 teet;
Thence 183.62 feet along the arc of a cu?ve to the right whfch are'subtende a ohord bearing Norlh 68 degrees
12 minutes 30 seconds East, 181.76 teet; Thence South 77 degrees 40 minutes 21 seconds East, 62.77 feet;
Thence 147.43 feet along the arc oi a curve to the left which are subtends a chord bearing North 86 degrees
36 minutes 17 seconds Eest, 145.60 feet; Thence North 70 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds Eest, 406.55 feet;
Thence 54.10 feet along the arc of a cunre to the right vuhlch are suhtends a chord bearing South 47 degrees
20 minutes 37 seconds East, 44.20 feet; Yhence South 14 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds West, 110.51 feet;
Thence South 68 degrees 18 minutes 91 seconds West, 320.00 feet;
Thence Norlh 19 degrees 07 minutes 05 seconds West, 50.00 feet;
Thence South 77 degrees 48 minutes 41 seconds West, 160.18 feet;
Thence South 10 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds West, 36.481eet;
Thence North 87 degreea 40 mfnutes 06 seconds West, 337.72 teet;
Thence (fVorth 11 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds East, 130.00 ieet Deed) North 11 degrees 55 minutes 31
seconds East, 729.75 feet AAeasured) to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Bearing from G.LO. record for South half of Section line betvreen Sections 14-15. (G.LO. record South Ot
degrees 302 minutes Fsst) (South 01 degrees 36 minutes 32 seconda Eest Measured)
WHEREAS, the property located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road has been replatted to a
single iot from an unplatted parcel in accordance with Section 17.20.030; and
WHEREAS, an application has been submitted to rezane the lot from
Primary/5econdary Aesidential to Low Density Multi-Family Residential; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediate
adjacent properties;
` WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission had a public hearing on the proposed zoning amendment and has submitted its
recommendation to the Town Counai; and •
WHEREAS, the appficant has agreed to plat restrictions which shalt be recorded on the
plat at the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder prior to second reading which
stipulate how the tuture devefopment shall occur; and
WHEREAS, all notices required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
6ti'HEREAS, the Town Council nas held a pubiic hearing as required by C;hapter 18.66
of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWiV
OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT:
. obinanao rm. s,
Sorbn ol 1820
ti
~
Section 1
The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in
Chapter 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fulfy satisfied, and all of
the requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments
have been fully satisfied.
Section 2
The Town Council hereby rezones the property from Primary/Secondary Residential to.
Low Densiry Mulii-Family Residential.
Section 3
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, ciause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the vatidiry of the remaining portions of
this ordinance; and the Town Counci4 hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance,
and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact
that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
invalid.
Sectios? 4
The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and prciper tor the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
Section 5 ,
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has.accrued,
any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any .
prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by
virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not
revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly
~ stated herein. _
Section 6
. All bylaws, orders, resoiutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith
• are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construsd to
revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
~ oram.ne. ?w. s,
s.ri. m I uN
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND OROERED PUBLISHED IN FULL ON
FIRST READING this 3rd day of May, 1994, and a public hearing shail be held on'the 17th
day of May, 1994, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail,
Coiorado. .
PVlargaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
BY TITLE ONLY this 17th day of May, 1994.
a
Margar A. Ostertoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
• Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Cierk ,
C:10RD915 Odlnenco ko. S,
Sorlao of 7000
r
l>
.
TYPE ill EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
WHEREA.S, 61~ } 1 AfP IO 's lhe owner of certain property ("the
Owner") described as: lii_u'T
. - ~
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions on the use of a unit or apartment
located on the Property for the benefit of the Owner and the 7own of Vail, Colorado ("the Town").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, esiablish, acknowledge, declare for the
benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, or lease, or hold the subject land the foliowing
, restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the land and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, its respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
- L7
1. Unit or ApaRment - R . containing ~ square feet, is hereby restricted as a ~
. ~
Type III Employee Housing Unit (EHU) which must comply with all the provisions of
Sections 18.57.020, 18.57.030, and 18.57.060 of the Vail Municipal Code as amended.
,
2. The Type III Employee Housing Unit shall be leased to tenants who are full-time
employees who work in Eagle County. An EHU sha!t not be leased for a period less than
. thiny consecutive days. For the purposes of this section, a full-time employee is one who
wor?cs an average of thirty hours eaCh week.
3. A Type III EHU may be soid, transferred,, or conveyed separately from other dwelling units
or Emptoyee Housing Units that may be located on the same lot or within the same building so long as it meets the following conditions:
aj ii must ue used 'oy iiie uwner oi the EiiLJ as a permanen{ residence. ror ihe
purpose of this paragraph, a permanent residence shall mean the home or place
in which one's habitation is fixed and to which one, whenever he or she is absent,
has a presenl intention of returning aher a departure or absence therefrom,
• regardless of the duration of absence. In determining what is a permanent
residence, the Town staff shall take the following circumstances reVating to the
owner of the residence into account: business pursuits, employment, income
sources, resAence for income or other tax purposes, age, marital status,
567260 B-671 P-242 07/13/95 10:45A PG 1 OF 3 REC DOC
Sara J. Fisher Eaqle County Clerk & Recorder 16.00
4
e
0
Q residence of parents, spouse and children if any, location ot personai and real
property, an motor vehicle registration.
b) If a Type 111 ENU is sold, transterred, or wnveyed separately trom the other
dwelling units and/or Type III Empioyee Housing Units in a multifamily structure it
is apart of, or from other dwelling urRs and/or Type III EHUs located on the same
lot, the Type Ill EHUs in the structure or on that lot shall be subject to all the
' provision set forth in Sectibn 18.57.020.
4. The Type III EHU shall not be divided iMo any form of timeshares, interval ownership, or
fractional fee ownership as those terms are defined in the Municipal Code of the Town of
Vail.
5. iVo later than February 1 of each year, the owner of each employee housing unit within the
town which is constructed following the effective date af this chapter shall submit two
copies of a report on a form to be obtained from the Communhy Development Department,
to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail and Chairman of the Town
G~
of Vail Housing Authority setting forth evidence establishing that the employea housing unit
~
has been rented throughout the year, the rentaV rate, the emplover, and that aer.h tpnP.nt ~
~
who resides within the employee housing unit is a full-time employee in Eagle County.
6. The owner of each EHU shali rent the unit at a monthly rental rate consistent whh or tower
M than those market rates prevalent for similar properties in lhe Town of Vail.
w
O
7. The Town of Va+I Housing Authority will determine the market rate based on the study of .
'
a other units of comparable size, location, quality and amenities throughout the Town. The
¢
LO market rate shall be based on an average of a minimum of tive rental rates of comparable
° units. If the unit is not rented and is not available at the market rate it shall be determined
to
rn to be in noncompliance. In addition to any other penalties and restrictions provided herein,
_ . ~ .
' cn
~ a unil founu to be in noncompliance shali be suoject to Qublicatian as detecmined by tne
~
° Housing Authority.
, N
r7'
N
a 8. Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type lll EHU, the prospective purchaser
~ shall submit an application to the Community Development Department documenting that
ca
'm ' the prospective purchaser meets the criteria set forth above and shall includE an affidavit
affirming that he or she meets these criteria.
o .
. co
N
t- 2
cD
~
9. The provisions of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by the Owner and the
Town.
10. The conditions, restriciions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be
J- waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the
Town of Vail and the Owner of the property.
~ TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corp~ration
ey:
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2!~day of ~ y 19 9J
~ oPublic~
. ~ ^ . • : . Mne E. Vftfit, Note?Y Pubie
_ . . Nb ~~~ge E)qfts 617•1999 Road
'
My cnmmission ezpires:
BV:
Property ners
' 1•.
j rN
The foregoing insirument was acknowledged before me this day of
f
Notary ublic ~p7q ~D'O
.A ~
' My commission expires: P<n
~
Or
. F:W~yon~Vutm~~FJ1Ut11
~
567260 B-671 P-242 07/13/95 10:45A PG 3f,,': OF 3
, . . . T
.,3 . , -
.
d .
.
~
.
~
.
i#~:•>/ ~
1 •
1
.f
/•'•%;•`•;;;'';:z:i>~?'»:?'>`?s?>Ez:::':;:'
. ~ h•.::-::: s
f
1.:':.. .
~ e
/
:.r
i
1
1 ~
,...i:::s.~,M,..~, .w..~,,._.. . .
2J28/96
, Dear Andy, ~
I wish to state for the record that Iwork in Eagle County forty hours per weel: at AMR
Services and that I intend to use my Innsbruck Meadows unit as my primary residence.
Sincerely,
Peter Battin~
71~
Peter Battin %
,
Nota v
. ~ I i~1(v
'•m`~~
z o o
~
~°o° cct; ~ .
o
0
0
~'J. 00 ",8~' ~
. ..0..00... My CammWon wlres 9011q11999 -
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
]FR: Bob McLaurin
~
RIE: Town Manager's Report
DT: March 15, 1996
1996 Commaanfl~ ~nan-veX
The 1996 Community Survey is scheduled to be mailed at the end of this month. This is the
eiglitth year we have surveyed residents, second homeowners and merchants. This questionnaire
' is attached for your information. This is the third consecutive year we have used this format.
This format is used to identify satisfaction levels with various town services and departments. It
also asks "how are we doing?" with respect to the Town Staff, TOV Boards and the Town
Council.
The survey is used to help measure performance. As you will recall, each TOV department
identifies specific outcome measures in the town budget. This survey is one of the principle
tools we use to measure organizational and departmental performance. This year the survey will
also focus on community priorities with respect to various town services. We intend to use this
data as we work through our budget problems.
Please note this copy of the survey is still in draft form. We will be conducting several focus
groups on March 18 and 19 to help test the instrument. If you have comments or questions
regarding the instrument, please feel free to contact Suzanne at 479-2115. We would like to hear
your comments by Tuesday evening in order to maintain our schedule. We intend to mail the
survey at the end of March, and have the data by the middle of May. This will provide us with
the results in time to assist in our internal budget work.
Ten Year Budlged Update
As we discussed several weeks ago, flattening sales collections and increasing costs due to
inflation makes the Town's financial future somewhat uncertain. I indicated at that meeting we
would be working internally over the next four months to develop a strategic financial plan in
order to deal with this problem.
Pursuant to the format discussed at the Kezziah Watkins, the attached documents show the
Statement of Problem and a list of Givens. I have also attached chart showing the process we
will use develop the strategic financial plan. As indicated in the chart, this wark will conclude in
August when we prepare the 1997/98 budget document.
' 93-11-96 12:01 RRC A9SOCIATES ID=303 449 6567 P•02
'll'OWRl OF prAIQ., CO11'i1VII1NLTY 3UtVEY 1996
,
7fJbefollooWng queseenea.s pPobe cwtadw emm aelafed do tbe adrqttacy OndpcrfnrMcofsce njt9ee Qooow nj glail govevs+ment
We w+mld appPeciate your vawopLve to Bdee c8enf ovDaiek yoas are able. ff.yoea 66a ve aeo oparesnro, or no &ndwledge of a
' Pae8ds:eslov ssebjea:B, pIBQ83B lE/flldC bLa6dLt /DA 8Y86I8LN8XR 8W BId~ appYOJJP6ate waGe.
l. Hora satisficxi are you, in geneeal, with the overall pcrCoemance and responsiveness ot'the "i'own of Vail govcrnment?
Usc: a seale from 1 to S wherc 1 mcans "Alot at Alt Satisfied" and 5 means "Vc;ry 5atisficd."
N(.1T AT AI.1. VF.RY
t;A'175FIED _ 3ATISFIf.1)
'fnvsm Councll 1 2 3 4 5
Boaeds and Cosrantusxions 1 2 3 4 5 ~ N • ` ` , : ,
Town or Vail staff ] 2 3 4
~t u. ~•cC~~aa~ds: w ~~T.
- . a 4~``v• -
. . . , '~---7_- ' '
Ayyv
2. What do yau bclicve are the tbra: bigbest problems, in ordea of priority, facing thc Ta`an ot Vai17
1.
2.
3.
3, Howr do you rate your satisfactiou wilh the fbllowing public faciliucs and services fin QW 'S"oavn o6 @/ael'1
N(rT AT Al.l. VliltY AIO OPINIqIV/
, SATI51~11:0 SA'175FIF:) Bi»v"r a:nrOw
Snow removal feoen roads 1 2 3 4 5 0
5urct sweepang 1 2 3 4 5 0
Road maintcnance (potholcs, cracks, etcJ I 2 3 4 5 0
(:onditiaa? of peics4rian valkways 1 2 3 4 5 0
i
< Maire 1lail roundabout 1 2 3 4 5 0
p?dcquac,y of svect ligh4ing l 2 3 4 5
Enforccmcnt of trmffic regula4ions (speeding,
recklcss driving, DUI, cOc.) 1 2 3 4 S 0
Crimc preven4ian, fecl6mg oP securiry 1 2 3 4 5 0
Uff-stree¢ pse2sing I 2 7 4 S
Eatfpre;cmeaeY of parhing regulatipns ! 2 3 4 5 0
TYasb/LiUcr, abanc9oned dchiclcs 1 2 3 4 5 (l
Rfeighboehood noise 1 2 i 4 5 U
-Animals (running a4 targe, birking) 1 2 3 4 5 A
Adequacy Or signs (stra:t namcs, traffic canlrols) 1 2 3 4 5 0
Pollu4ion ffroen waWsmoke 1 2 3 .S 5 p
Extent oF Tecreadonal facilities (bikc paths,
parks, P1aYgrounds) 1 2 3 4 5 0
Other: 1 2 3 4 3 0
Commpuo4o: V . -
vniMrriYp119J6U:()AAMS1JRV1CX' pal
03-11-96 '12:01 RRC ASSOCIATES' I13=303 449 6587 P.03 4. How do you rdte your lcvcl nf satisfaction with public CACilities and services; iTi thc'I'awn? .
Frcaucncv aad Oualiri ot Bug Svstem
NU'I' AT AL.I. VERY N() c)YINIUN/
8A'17SPllill _ SA7'15FiLD DC1N'T KNOW
1+eyuency uf•
In-town shunle 1 2 3 4 5 U
Sandstone route 1 2 3 4 5 0
East Vail routc I 2 3 4 5 0
West Vail roulC 1 2 3 4 S 0
Golf CouTSe roulc 1 2 3 4 5 0
i.ionsridgC L,oap toute 1 2 3 4 5 0
IFord Yark route 1 2 3 4 5 U .
Gypsum to Vail routc: • 1 2 3 4 5 U
Quality:
Adequacy of bus xhcltcrs 1 2 3 4 5 0
Rus dnvCt coutiCSy 1 2 3 4 5 0
• Cicanlincss oCbuses I 2 3 4 5 U
Dcpcndability of bus service 1 2 3 4 5 0
k'aza-Transit (handicappcd/spcctial nccds) 1 2 3 4 S 0
Parkin~
Nc1T nT nLL vIiRY N4 oPrNrnw
1A'I'ltih'1l:1J SA'I'[tiFIh:l) !n)IV'T KNOW
AmouM of parkinK in
Viliagc: parking structure 1 2 3 4 5 U
Amount af parking in
Lionshead parking structure 1 2 3 4 5 U
Discount parking prvgram (dcbit card) i z 3 4 s o
BOOIh aliCndanl courtesy 1 2 3 4 S 0
Speed of transaction at exit boolh. 1 2 3 4 5 U
Overall parking fee pricing structure 1 2 3 4 5 0
Commcats On Town Services:
vzi1lwwrM~+sx,u:c,nuNSVxv.ruxj pg2
03-11-96 12:01 RRC ASSOCIATES ID=303 449 6567 p,04
• 5, The Comenunitv Developmcne Dep.tetment provides planning, design rewiew, cmrironmcntal, heallh, and buitding
insgsection scrvices. Plr.ase ratc your satisfaction wilh 1.he follovaing aspcc;ls of 4he C.ommunity Dcvcloprncnl
Depaetmcnt. (Basc your eealuateon on experiencxs you havc; h.3d, or dcCnite impressions you have formcd from what
you'vc hcard. Cheose'Alo (Vlnion/Doa't Know"where app6icable,)
W()'f AT N.1. VE12Y NO ()YIMONI
SA'1'LSFIEn SATISNtM.I) BO 'tY 1' IiNC)W
[Zesnqloveeo
Orrera6l M:rvice and c[riciency l 2 3 4 5 0
Coueticsy and alli4ude 1 2 3 4 5 U
Competence and professionalism 1 2 3 4 S U
QDpes'sAionts .
ncvelopmenl rcview prucCSS (sta(T Icvel) 1 2 3 4 5 U .
. Building pcrmit plan rcview I 2 i 4 5 U
New Pcranil Coun9cY (as op'3an. I, 1996) 1 2 3 4 5' U
Zuning code ukfoecemcnt 1 2 3 4 5 0
Bieild'ang inspectioees d&. code enCOrcement 1 2 3 4 5 0
Sagn wdc enfoaceonCat 1 2 3 4 5 U
Restaueant unspec:tioaa prorr-am 1 2 3 4 5 0
Environcnenta? planning program 1 2 3 4 5 0
Enviroiuaiern8al code enforccment ' 1 2 3 4 5 Q
6. Arc you awarc ot the Totan af Vail's housing lottcry process?
a) l l Yes
b) f 1 No 7. (8F Y(F-4) How woulc9 youu ratc ttlc effecQivcr?ccs of the housing lottcry?
NUT AT Al.l. VC•.RY wOornNuOwi
EFFRC:77VLs GFFF..L:1'1 VI~: IK~N"1" KAIOVd
1 Z 3 4 g 0
- 8. Fttorts hawe bccn made to crcate a morc user-fraendly Community Developmc;'u Departmcnt. 9-lave you n(iticed any
changc in the a4tilucflc or perforrnance of thc (:onununity Dcvelopmcnt Departmcnl slaff over thc past 12 monlhs?
0 1 1 Ycs
b) l l Mo
c) f 1 Uncertain .
Please explain:
9. Hoda sausf'ted arC you vvilh 1hC police and Gre protectiori services in t}iC '1'own of V:iil?
NC?T AT AI.1, VGRY NU UPIPIIQN/
SATISFIKU . DA'f'ISI•7E1). IX)N'T tfAi()W
Fiee
- Fire pro9cxtion and response 4ienc 1 2 3 4 5_ p
Fieg; COde enforccmCnt 1 2 3 4 g 0
Emergency medical seroic,.t 1 2 "i 4 5 U
Firc ccBuCaeion servia:s I 2 3 4 5 0
Ovcrall feeling of sccurity in Lhc commcrciaf
cx:ntcrs of !/aal 1 2 3 4 S 0
Visbilil.y of golice foot/vchicle patrol 1 2 3 4 5 0
~ Fraendlinc:.•s and approachability of
Vail policc dcpaatment cmployees l 2 i 4 3 U
Cnmu prewetation aClivitees in schools 1 2 3 4 S 0
Overall pcrforenance of Vail Police Dcpartment 1 2 3 4 5 (l
commcnta: ixx: DPJ
03-11-96 12:02 RRC ASSOCIATES ID=303 449 6567 P.05
1(1. How salisfied arc you wiih the following sc;rvices and facilitics providcd by thc library? ,
Ncxr nTat.i, vLRY nox"7• kNOwi
SA'17SPiF;1) _ SA7'19FlF.l) N() c)NIPIIt1N
Servicc~
ResearCh information 1 2 3 4 5 q
nn-line d.itabases I 2 3 4 S U
Fiction books 1 2 3 4 S IJonficlion books 1 2 3 4 S U
Vidcfls, Cds 1 Z 3 4 5 q
MagtzinCS and ncwspapers 1 2 3 4 5 U
Books on tape 1 2 3 4 5 0
Ghildren's books 1 2 3 4 5p
Children's story limes 1 2 3 4 5 U
Facil'atieb
I.cvci of crowd.ing within facility 1 2 3 4 5 A
iiourseroperation 1 z 3 a s u
Lc.wel of nnisc 1 Z 3 4 5 p
Cammcnts:
11. How would you r,ttc tlte ovcrall performance of thc following administrative/managcntenl furtctions of thC 'I'own
' bovcrnment? NU'fATAid. VF.RI' NOUP1N14N1
SA'!'ISF1R.1) 4ATi3rIliU TX)N"l' KNl)W
Genera{ administration (managcr's off-icc,
finanac deparimcnt, clerk's office, staft) 1 2 3 4 5 U
Responsivcncss,to public inpudconcerns 1 2 i 4 5 p
[nfor[nation disseminalipn (newslctters,
meetings, announcerncnts) ] 2 3 4 5 0
Municipai Court 1 2 3 4 5 p
Financc/cashier window 1 2 3 4 S 0
Saics tax bt business liccnsc servioc.: ! 2 3 4 5 U
` Commenta:
12. Thc Town of Vail is facing potenlial budget shortages wcr ilie next several yc;irs. Plr?sc hClp us to ev.iluate which
setviccs.stud programs are MUS'C esscnl.ial to maintain at currcnt or exp:urded levels, :+nd which ace of lowcr priority
given limilcxi resourccs. •
RE1~tJCb: MA1NTnlN iNCR1tiA8L Nt)UPJNION/
1_R10 CUHU- NT ' Pit[QRiI'Y TX)N"f A'Nl)W
Trsaeoortateun/ 'trcetsu
f'ublic frinsit/bus sc`rvice 1 2 3 q S p
- Yarking Structures 1 2 3 4 S p
Strcct maintenanc:c 1 2 3 4 5 U
TrafTc: coutrol 1 2 3 4 5 . U
Expand strcet capacity lo reducc cangestion 1 2 :i 4 5 0
Park* and Recry• ion
Acquisition at sites 1 2 "i 4 5 0
llevelopment of cxititing facilitics 1 2 3 4 S. U
Maintenanc:c; of existing park facilities 1 2 3 4 5 t)
Mainten.icicc of trails/bike paths 1 2 3 4 5 0
,nduwm%1Q%r.0nnMSi.7RVrxx: psa
03-31-96 12:03 RRC ASSOCIATES ID=303 449 6587 P-06
• ~ ~O~l~~ ~~PVIC0~4 •
~ Crime psevicn4ion/edoication l 2 3 4 5 c)
TriR'ic enforoernent 1 2 3 4 3 (1
UaiifQruned pattol serwices I 2 3 4 5 0
}~'au~ ~~~m~4
C:ode enfforccment 1 2 3 4 5 0
L'mcrgenry mwacal response 1 2 3 4 5 0
Constauction oC mv.v firc §tatioa 1 2 3 4 5 0
ILi
~'icneral library seYVdces I 2 3 2 5 p
COmmU91ige[ DCYCllODYBeII4 A
Code enforccment L 2 3 4 5 U
l.ong-range planroing/neighisorhood planning i 2 i $ 5 U
Devclopmetbt PcdeCea paacess 1 2 3 4 5 Q
Environencaital plantting 1 2 3 4 5 p
Hmaamia
Pernrision of atrorclable housing l 2 3 4 5 0
QBt9eee Cic,-neral beautifacauonAaau'lwaping I 2 3 4 S p
Acquisi8aon and presenrataon oi' open spacc l 2 3 4 i p
Recycling program 1 a 3 4 5 U
Cicnerat administrativc/st:aff eupemscs 1 2 7 $ S U
Maantenanix off pvblic buildiaigs/faceiities 1 2 3 4 S U
ComanCnts or suggcxtions aboui prioaiYies for spending: 13, In the cvent of continuiag budgct shortialls, should the Town seeJc to rcfinancc its current dc$I in ordcr to spread oul
(hC iepa_yrncnt, red=ting annual paymcnts but, in the lang tc:rm, increasing the total amount of inlerest paid'!
, a) I 1 ves
b) [ 1 tvo
c) ( ] Unceatain
14. CurPCraYly, JS pcrcent of Lhc Town's salcs tax revetities aze alloc;aied to spa.tiGc capital c:.rpenditurc:s for anfrasteuc:euee -
' irnprove¢t1Cnl5 and 1iCw iacitities, wiulc GS pera;ni are allnc;itcd to general opeaaunns and naaintcnance (transil,
. snowplowing, etc.). Vdould you support alloc;ation of a larger peeccntage of n.~vc.nuies to general opexai.ions if such bscame necessary lo maantain (he desieed ]evels of .c.~rvice?
a) f ] ves
b) Il Wo
c) ! 1 ZJncx:rtain
15. Wouid you suppurf the crealion of a pmgram imolving increascd user fees for certain public seeviceg such a.c Ihc
librdry, public frattsit, rcerea4ion fac.~ilities, or p:?rking if such becanie ncrmssary to m;iintain the desired Icvcls of
service'>
a) l 1 Yes
b) No
c) ~ J Unccrmin
16. Vdould you suppori a tax iYK;rease to fund essential scrvices
g) I I Yes
b) I 1 No
c) p a Uncertain
vadluxm11"61C'(7MMCURV.1tX: PRS
03-11-96 12:03 RRC ASSOCIATES 113=303 449 6567 P.07 ~
17, Under tight budget circumstancxs, which of the following is the MOST appropriatC public polic_y? And what , .
would bc youur seoond choicc? '
Fixsr SL•'CUNI)
citaicL cNOicc
a) ! i l J Refinance cxisting debc
b) ~ 1 I 1 lncmasc rcvcnue allocauon from capital budgq to general opcrating fund
c) l 1 ~ I Adopi expandcd uscr fees (ar initiatc where not currc:n(ly in placc)
d) f 1 I I Incrc.m sales taK
e) f) Cul back essential public serviccs
Please provide f/ec follnwiltg denugraphic infnrntnteoir. Feel jree to /Cave blank any qpmtiows you are aot comfortahlt
ansxer?eltg. Agriin, srerveys wiU rrmrrin onnny?rtoqa. Please dn Itpt wrile yaur Karqe or aclJress nA thts yarvey.
18. Whcrc is your residencc wilhin the town of Vail located?
a) East vait
b) Booth Falls and Bald Mountain ltnad arLas
C) I 1 Bootli Creek/Aspen Laiic .
d) 1 J Golf Coursc
c) ~ ~ Vail Village
~ I ) i.ionshead
g) I I YolaW Patch. Sandstniu:
h) 8uffehr Creek, Lionsridge, the Vallcy
i) 1 J Vail Commons/Safeway arca
J) f 1 Wcsl Vail (iwrth of I-70)
k> ~ j Maltcrhom, Glen Lyan
1) [ntermountain
rn) ~ j Nol a resident of t.hc Town of Vail
19. Which of the foqowing categori4s best describes your residency status7
a? I I ti'car-azound Vail ruideni '
b) ~ j Seasonal Vail resident
c) Owncr of vacauon propcrty in Vail
d) Non-residGnt, owner of business or cvmmercial propc;rty in Vai(
c) I 1 Othcr;
20, Do You own or operatc a business within thc Town of Vail?
a) ( I Yes
b) r i No
21. How Long.havc you lived withiii the town of Vail (or owned property ;f a non-residcnl)'!
( I l.ess thm 1 yc:ar
b) yc:drs '
c) 6-15 years
d) Morc than 15 years
- 22.- Do you own orreat your propctty?
a) I 1 Own
b) l I tteni c) f I 01her (specify)_ _
v,rilltownt19Wiu7oMMSUAV.ixx' P8h
~ 03-21-96 12:03 RRC ASSOCIATES ID=303 449 6597 p,86
0
° 23. lA/hich of 4hese categorics bcsl dcscritses ynur marital status?
a
. al [ I Singlc
b) ~ j Singlc vyilh c;hildren
c) ~ I Single, chi)dren no longcr at homc
d1 l I Couple, no childaen
e) ~ J Couplc wilh childgen at home
Q [ J Couple, cheldren no longer at homc
lF YUU FIAYT C:HILDl2~'N
24. Hovu many are in lhc follovding agc groups?
a) U-5 years
b) 6-12 ycazs
c) 13-19 ycaFN 25. Including yoursclf, how many Jsersons reside in your hausehold7
26. Which of these categories hesl dcsc;ritx;s yrnir Agc?
Urider ao c) ~ i 45-54
b) 20-24 f) ~ J 55-64
" c) 25-34 g) 65 or over
d) I I 3 5-44 h) llo not wisti to eeply
27. VVhich nf thcm c:xtegeries lxsfl describes the annual inco[ne of your houschold (bcforc hsucs)?
a) f 1 $0-14,999
b) S15,000-34,999
C) ll $35,0(x)-49,999
d) ~ t $50,000-74,999
c) l j $75,000-99,999
0 1 $100.000- I 49,999
S) $150,0011 or more
h) Do not wish to reply
Thank you fo~YOMePartacapa8onn 6n oMr veaeavch pwvmm.
vailltnwn515Rtt~u`x)MMSUkV.ISCx, rg7
TOWN OF VAIIC,
T1EN YEAR BUDGET
~~~~ement off Prolbllem
Although financially secure today, the Town's ability to maintain its future financial well being
is jeopardized by flattening revenues and growing expenses. Since 1994 sales tax collections, the
largest source of revenue used provide municipal services can capital improvements in Vail,
have been unable to keep pace with inflation. If these conditions are allowed to continue, the
Town will face a$7 million deficit in the year 2005. Our challenge is to decide how to make
adjustment now, in the form of reduced expenditures, service modifications, tighter budgeting,
increased revenues, or a combination of all, to avert financial hardship for this community's
future. Anything less would be irresponsible.
Gnvens
4- All decisions and recommendations will be made within the context of the Town of Vail
Organizational Values.
The do nothing alternative is not acceptable. We will proactively address this situation.
1P There will be no lay offs. There may be reductions in force, but these will occur through
attrition and turn over.
4- Decisions about service provisions and service level modifications will be made with
extensive public involvement.
+ There will be no across the board reductions. Each service, task and process will be
reviewed, analyzed and evaluated separately.
lProcess
(see attached)
,mwr,oFvAa ~ TOV Budget Deficit Public Process `
March 1 March 1-7 March 1-5 March 1-4 March 1-5
Define Problem ~ Ask People to ~ Estabtish "Givens" ~ Identify Interests ~ Establish Eapectations ~
Validate Problem including who will and Issues for Participation
make tinai decision
~ Establish Problem Statement ~
< How do we balance the budget .
in the next 10 years?
Possible Tools Possible Tools Possible Tools Possible Tools Possible Tools
o Media coverage/editorials o Informai Dialogue with o Brainstomting at 3-1 staff o Issues, interests 0 Brainstorming at 3-1,staff
0 10 Year Model Newspaper Publishers meeting o Matrix meeting
0 Sales Tax receipts - retail sales o Informal Dialogue with 0 Council Meeting Approval o Group Lists o Council Meeting Approval
o Council Retreat, discussion Lionshead Merchants
0 1996 Budget assumptions, Association (3-1)
salary freeze o Informal Council Meeting
Update (3-5)
o lnformal Dialogue with TOV
customer contacts during
week
o Monitor letters to the editor,
otherfeedback
_1 3-1-96 Community Information Office
rowr,oF~,au j TOV Budget Deficit Public Process
I
March 1- Ongoing March 1 March I-7 ~ Step 1 March i l- I S Step 2 March 27-May 15
I
I
Assess Information ~ Design Process ~4 Ask People to What's the Role of the W-4 What's the Best Way to ~
Needed React to Process I TOV Governmeiit? Balance the Budget Over the
Next 10 Years.'
• To participants for judgment Leadership
• From participants for decision Service • Service Priorities
Possible Tools Possible Tools Possible Tools Delivery • Service Ratings
I
? Brainstorming by staff ? Citizen Participation ? Informal dialogue with ~ Possible Tools Possible Tools
? Citizen feedback through Workbook newspaper publishers
informal dialogues e Brainstorming by Task Force ? Informal dialogue with Four focus groups (to help ? Written survey mailed to
staff Lionshead Merchants ~ shape written survey) registered voters, merchants,
Association (3-1) ~ (pull participants from Vail and a sampling of second
? Informal Council meeting ~ Hosts, TOV Board applicants, homeowners
updaie (3-5) I Vail Commons inquiry list) e Group meetings (service clubs
o Informal dialogue with TOV I representing a cross-section of
customer contacts during ~ community)
week . i
~I
~ I
~ I
~
~I
. ~
~ I
~
0. I
I
~
2 ~ 3-1-96 Community Information Office
ro~rvoFV,w. TOV Budget Deficit Public Process Step 3 May 15 - 22 6tep 4 May 22 - June 30 Step 5 Juiy 1- August I Step 6 August 1- October
Analyze Alternatives ~ Service and Revenue mgm+ Town Staff' Prepares 1997 -~4 Final Budget Adopted
Suggested Options Narrowed Based Budget Based on Citizen on Citizen-Defined TOV Priorit'ses
Government Role and
Community Service
Priorities
Possible Tools Possible Tools Possible Tools Possible Tools
o Community newsletter o Present preliminary plan back o Media coverage 0 Media coverage
published in Vail Trail to original service groups who 0 Thank you ads from TOV to 0 Televised Evening meeting
o Televised update at Town participated in previous include listing of citizen
Council meeting discussions priorities
o Media coverage of analysis o Two Town Council "mobile"
work sessions
o Town Council televised
Evening Meeting
_3_ 3-1-96 Community Information Office
Oflic;C nl Llu' 13t strd O( C_.iniI Iuiss io ni-1s F~tiIc County liuildin;,•
(971)) 318-860.S I'.O. Rox 850
Fax. (970) .37H-72117 SlIt1 flr~adway
I 1)I): (970) 328-8797 H Ili1 I-0$50
MaPCP1 12, 1996 - 16:51
~GLE COtINTYp COLORADO .
AGEnIDA .
F IJNTY OMIVlISStQNERS
BOARD ~~~ULAR MEETING DAY
MARcH 18,1996
[a o 0 0 o a o a a o ca c o cA 4 sr o~~~ p~y ir t~ ~r tr ir fr~s ~f o o tr a n v
Ua 8o30 ' 10.00 7VORK JCSSIOld -PCNDII\V LATIVATION
.iames R_ Fritze, County A44omey
10a00 - 10e96 BREd4K
2e 90015 - 51416 WORK SESSION - WEEI(LY UPDATE
S. 11o15 ~ 12~0 WOFtfC SESSION - MEETINtGS AT"TENDED
~ 12o00 = 9030 LUNCH
~o 1o30 - 9.45 C IVSEIVT C14LEIVDAR
IIlYe1[sM0 roW61o and non-mnUnveraiel nemoe ore pleceA an the ppnseryq qlendaPte elbw lhe Boafd oP Couh9y Commisslonors b apen9
ha tlnm end emrgy on more fnportnrd iteme on e Enngthq openda. Any Commisslonsr nwy rmqwst thet sn hwm bo'REMONEp' Pmn,
the omignoil cm'gn der a11d Wlleideted sepa?aFely. A11y member oi Um puL6c meyp 'R EqUEST arry iism 6e"REMOVEp" (rotn th0 Cqns=i
Agonft_
~ .
A. BILL PA1fIIVG FOR TFIE WEE!( OF lVIIo1RCH 18, 1996
Linda Pankuch, Accounting
Mark Silverthorn, Controller
ACT9ON. ,4pproval, subject to review by ghe County Administrator
~ 9e AGREENIEIVT BETVVEEIV HOFiSE AAOUN'TA1N
NCH, LLC AND EAGLE CQUNTY REGARDING
HOidSE MOUIV7'AIN FtAPICIi lVIETROPOLITAIV
`DISTRICT .
~ Mary Jo Berenato, At4orney's Offid;e
AC'nOm: ConS6der approvaB
~
`
1
1
1
Eagle Boerd of Coun4y Commissioners .
Agerada, March 18, 1996
Page 1"wo
ffEMS ON THE RECORD
aa 1o49 - 2~00 UQUOR LICENSE IHEAIZIIVG
SPECIAL USE PERAAIT a TASTE QF VAIL dba/l"ASTE
OF !!AI L
S. 2:00 - 3:00 A 7'EIIAENT HE4RINC;S
A. FRED P. KENiVY - SCHEDULE #41638
B. COL)NTRI' CLiJB pF THE RQCKIES - SCHEDIJLE #R039689
C. GARY & MrARGIE PLATH - SCHEDULE #39833
0. WOLUAM A. STEPHENS - SCHEDULE #30252 (1995)
PARCEL #32113-052-029
E. 11VILLJAM A. STEPNENS - SCHEDULE #17187
F. WiLL9AM A- STEPHENS - SCHEDULE #30252 (1995)
PARCEL 42113-00-010
G. TiD1PO RIVERS IN1/ESTMENT - SCHEDULE #2401 1
(1993)
H. WYLUAAA A. STEP1iENS - SCHEDULE #24011 (1994)
Oo WILUAaA A. STEPFIEIVS - SCHEDULE #24011 (1995)
J. JOFIN & JANICE CARDINALE - SCHEDULE
' #P022480 .
Mary Jo Berenato, Afforney's Qffic~
~CTdONo Consider approval , T. Se00 - 3e06 ORDER OF CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN
UNCOLLECTABLIE TAXES
Karen SheaffeP, Treasurer
ACT9OMe Consider approval
a. 3.06 - 4:00 WORK SESSIOIV - GIS SYSTENa
Allen Black, Coun9y Assessor
6:00 - 7a00 WORK SESSION - RED CLIFF TOiNlV COUlVCBL
YHE WEIjY l1AEETIPIG OF TCiE EAOLE CWl@dYY COlAWAIS3IONER8 IANLL BE b119LD OPO dAAFlCF9 99, 99Y5
/9LL WAEE71P1G5WLL BE HE9.D IPd TNE El1GLE COUNYY BUILDIHG - 500 BROApyyAY, ¢qp{ E- pR 0411ERWI9E NOYEO.
T@iIS AGENDA 16 PROVIDED FOR IMFORMA7IONAL PURPOSES ONLY - ALl TIRiIES ARE AppROxIMATE.
THE BOARD IflMILE IN SESSIO9u MAv C01dSI0ER OTHER I7Elel8 TFOwT ARE BIiOUGhT BEFORE IT.
('.?fFicc i~( ihc Ruarce oE (:r?ln~nissioncrs C.~ounty li~~il<lin~;
(970) 32$. fi(iUS 1'.O. Rox 85t1
Fax! (970) 3211-7207 5(1(1 llrtildw.,y
(w(1) 32R-8797 . 1=.qde, (.~iliruln $ I631-085(1
March 12, 1996 - 9 6:48
EAGLE COUN'I'Y, COLORADO
AGENDA BOAFt F lJ NT'Y COIVI MQ SSiO1V ER~
~~~~~NG MEET6NG DAY
MA C H 19, 1996
,
is aaaaa *irdaa co+o-~daaaoffoaaaavao~amc a woaes
9:06 - 9:45 aeme WORfC SESSION - COMMUNiTI( DEVELQPMENT
Kei4h fViontsg, Director
9a46 - 10.00 a.ma PLAT AIVD RESbLIlT14N SIGIVIN_
Kathy Eastley, Planner, Community Development
10:00 - 10:20 a.m. PD-100-95-F-BACHELOR Gl1LCFi VILlJ4GE, FILINC; I
Kathy Eastley, 6'lanner, Gammunity Development
ACTlONe To consider a request for a final plat of 561.605 acres for 47
primarylsecondary lots, 9 tracts of open space, roads and
u4ifi4ies.
10:20 - 90:30 a.m. PD-908-96-AF1-BERRY RANCH, FLG 4. LO°P 22e .
BLIC I
~
Paftie Piaefela, Planning Tedlnician, Comrr+unity
Development
AC'TO N: To consider a request to vacate a poetion og a road
maintenance easement.
90:30 .10:45 a.6ffile BREA
10o46 - 91000 B.nL PO-296m95-F2-CORDIL.LERA VALLEY CL~~~ FLG 4. A
RESUBDIVISION OF TRACT U.
Kathy Eastley, Planner, Community Development
, ACT9OIVo To cflnsides a request a final pla4 for 17 single tamily Iots.
Eagle Board og Caunty Commissaoners
Agenda, RAarch 19, 9996
Page Two
91.00 m19a19 a.m, SE-320-96-REIfNQLDS E7(EMPTIdN, PARCEL 2
Kathy Eastley, Planner, Community Developrnent
ACT80N: To consider a Pequest for a subdivision exernption for 2 .829
acre parcel which has existed sirace 1983.
99e10 - 11e30 aoma ZC-279-95-1PRIiVG CREE1C
Paul Clarkson, Planner, Cammunity Developmen4
LCTI01~e To conslder a request for a zone change from Ftesource to
Agricultural Residential.
I4030 - a9.40 aomo Ge82-95-PQLAR STAR VACAT10N
George Roussos, County Engineer
ACN,~ To cansider a request for reducing the right-of-w6y for a
por4ion o9 Polar Star Driva from 80 f4 4o 60 ft.
11:40 - 11o50 aem. 1049-037a96-GORDlLLERA PR1DISEARDEN PARCEB.
ONlPLE7ENESS HEARINC
~
Ray nllerry, Environmenta! FlealtFt OUanager
AC To defermine completeness of a 1041 perrnit applicatian and
estirna4e fees. 11.50 - 12.00 P.M. SU-339-95-AF4-EDYVARDS iiiLLAGE CEIVTER. M 6 & 7
Sid Fox, Planninq Division Manager, Community
Development
ACT9ONe 'fo consider a Peques$ for an Amended Final Plat.
12o00 - 1e30 p.me
1e30 - 2e30 pome flN QFFfCE COnnPl1TER TRAiNrNG
2o30 - 3:30 pamo - J~~~ ~~~~~CTLQN
TC9E WEXT AAEE71W0 OF YHE ERGLP CQiJPW COMISS10tdERS WLL BE FiELD OI+I 11qARCW 26, 1888
ALL RAEETINO6 g1Nl.L BE PiELD IW YHE EAGLE COUPdN BUILpING - 500 BROADWAY, F-AGLE - DR OTHERVYI.SE NOTED.
TP49 At3EPdDA ls PRQMIDED FOR tA]FDRMATIONAl, b+uRPp9E3 ONLY - ALL T1MES ARE APpROXpNATE.
T61E SC1ARp lflfp4lLE IPd 8E631dP1 AAAY CON8IQER dTHER REM6'QtIqTARE BR011tBHT 6EFOFtE ET.
FROM : ABPLANALP PHONE N0. : 3043433648 Mar. 14 1996 12:51PM P02
0
u
Law oFr• ices '
DUNNy C`JBPLANALP & CHRisrENsrSENp P.C.
A PW0FFFS10o+wL CbNl'ORATION
JONPS W. dUPoM VAtt- BAMK BUILDIPdR TELEPHPPJE:
ARTMUR A. AaPlANA1.P. JW. ISUIYE 900 (070) 476-0900
AI.LEPd G. CFOPtIOTIEPo6EAf
DIARIE L. F1EflA~+APd 108 SDUTH FROMTARr ROAD dVH6T T~LECOPIEit:
CAWOL E. OAV~6 (090) 476-4988
bAll., CULORADO 81667
- KAWfiPo M. DUPoW
OpffC1ALCOYNOL4 CERTIFIED LEOALAB018TANT
JERWYtR/, Hnro+Ya?+ aQ MarC$a 1996
Towsa Cezwnci I
Towsa of Vaib
75 Sotsth Frontac~e Roac! West
Vaig ~O-
V%A TEbECOPIER ARlD VlA FEDERAL EXP1tESS Tow1 of Vail Plasaaaa8~c~ and
' Esnv~ronm~~~al Comqissioaa .
I , 75 Soiagh Frontage Road Wesg
Vail Cb
VrA TELECOPgER AA1D VYA F°EDERAL ECPRESS
I Re: %odge at ilail gznternatioraal Wing
%~~ar Sar ox Madama
pg Trh~is Fi~'a~ ~'ep~'esax~ts Mg> A~aata 5a1tz, the ouner of Coaadomini~t
VJnit 5L/ p Ahe Tiodge at Naid d9partment CdndOminiumgg on wdlose behaJlf
this letter as bea.ng dixeGted to youe
By this letter, Ms eAnata Saltx appeals the action of the Towaa
af Vail Department of Communaty Deaelopmexat and, to the extent and
if any action was taken, the Towra of Vai1 Design Review Boaacd,
approving certain revised plans of TYae I.odge at Vagl aaagexnational
Wiaago Deepate repeated requests £or informetfon and notace of
.cmngiderata.on of proceedings, notice was not psovicled of either stafg consadex'ation ox og any consaderatioxa by the Desiqn Review
Boardo Fog the reasonr noted below, tlaex-e iB uhcertainty from the
xecard regarding the nature of the acti.on whicta purports to $pprove
the paans wlaich apparently hawe, soanehowa been given approval
the Tor,n of Vail >
, The T" Coiagacil consiclexed and garre conditional appraval to
~ the Lodge %saternational Wigag isa early Deceanbero 19958 despite
objections by adjacent owmers based aaposa botfla desigaa and tgegpass
ango the comhion elements af the i,odge Apartmeant Cmndominiumo Ths
Couracal was assured by the developer that no trespass occurred
aaradeg the offered plan, arnd a.anposed only the condatiorn that tha
pbaga be $edeeagned to increase the buffeac betvaeen the Iaaternationag
Wing penthouse stuuctpre and the affected Lodge Apartment
condominiums> The deve~opex theaa suB>mitted a revased praposal to
the Departsnent af Community Developeneaat wttacta confirmeei the
exis~ence off the trespasB previouslgr idesatffied in the plasa
preoented to, considered and conditioanally appxoved by the Town
+ FROM : ABPLANALP PHONE N0. : 3043433648 Mar. 14 1996 12:52PM P03
A
Councile That revised plan was di.sapproveci by the Departmemt of
Community Development staff, at which tiAne anterested paz'tioe were
effectavely cut off from negotiations which ocCUrreci betweega sta£f
and the d~~elopere
Oun the 12th of P9arch8 1996, this Fixm xeceiveci notiCe that a
revised plan fau the Lacige at Vail Internation81 Ydiatg haci beeaa
approved b~ ~own of Vail. I't is that approval which is the
sas~~ ~ct mf this appeale
Initaaglya the$e is uaacertainty reqa=ding the souxCe of the
appaeovalo and therefore the nature of the aplpeaX oThe Town Councig
re£erred the plaaa caaisidereci by a.t an December baGk to the
Departnaent of Coanautaraity Development staf fo Howevex' Q the "ap1Prmveti"
plan provialecl by the '~own of vail indiCat~~ that it wag °'Approved
by the Towta of Vaal Desagn Revaew Boazd - iKarch 7a 1996", and also
endicates that at was "ApProved bI? Staff - Arady Itntadtsen - 3l7j96'° o
Therefore Q the Towaa' a recoxd indicatea that appro~al may have
occux'red either by the Design Review Board ox bgr staff, or by btatha .
WQ3 s$laAl TCely YdpO%D the TCawC1 tO C1@~ermY81e whO toODK the aCt10Ya atld $o
direct this appeag to the appropriate body, isa accordaaace with the
daig Muaaicipag Codeo
Wath refere%bGe tO the ICea60Y1B for tYfl1s appealo they age
m18l$9.pleo
1e 'l1ha plffin wh1Ch waS p]C"Ov1C1ed ag8d bdOn$lfg~~ that
receiva¢ag Town of Vail appraval i$ virtually unintelligible; buto
$o the ezteng at is antelligBble, it clearl.y hae no relationehip to
that wh2.ch was approved by the Towca Councig o Ttaeseforeg the
app7lication must be iaaitiated as a new proceBsB rather thara beinq
subject to wholesal.e redesigra at the discretion of Commuality
Developmeaat stafg e .
2. The now pian has an area which is between Condom3.nium
LPnit 527 and 533, on the west, and the pexathouse 4tructuace, oaa t12o
easto which is not labelec3o dia9ramed, or the subject of ar?y
eIevationo and wtnich was not included on the praos plane_ Yt may be
an egevatar shagt, and it anay. have a slmping roof or a flat roafe
It may be two feet kaigho ox it may be twelve feet high. No
in€ormation ha~ ~~en pgovided which giver. any ixaformataoxa regarding
these questionsa
3. Neath~~ the '°Roog P1an°' raar the "Roof/P].aaateg 5ection1° iden$ifies the &o~ati~~ the latter eectaone One caxa only
specaalate even as to wiaether the Lodge Apartment Condominiuan is on
the geft or ga.gk~~ ~f that sectiono but it is clear ttaat the &atter
does aaot represesat a aection andicatixag the size or ianpact of the
structure arhach apparently is planned adjacent to i1nita 527 and
5330
1
FROM : ABPLANALP PHONE N0. : 3043433648 Mar. 14 1996 12:52PM P04
0
When, axad if, oaar c].ierat anci the mther objectors are provided
Ya9it$~ any add$tgoX6ab plallB 1nit11C$1 are nBC@B6a8'g7 tO 8na1[e
anndearstaradab3e those two maps whxch were pro'vided to ue, it may . be
61a to bderatafy with specificity other problems with the d8sign
which are not naw adenti£iable. By this letter, in addition to
ianitiating t&ne appeal as set foacth above..we again reque8t Copies
of all submattaJ.s, maps, planso COruespond@noe and Other anateri~l
presented to thse Town of vail in aseoca.ation wi.th tka~s mattero og
exchanaed betw~en' the Town of Vaal ammd the applicanto . .
ery truly ora o .
. DUNId, A p & SEYV',
Arthur A. Abplsaaal .7a-o
xC e P9eo Anita Sagtz •
P9r e Tom Moouhead
Mso AF1Y1 Fr11Ck
FRg e Jay Pe$erson
.
. . . . , . . _ . _ . _ . .
;
b J11 7~`<
Fall/Winter 1995 Lakewood, Colorado
F XyS~~~
COLO6tAD0
RECYCLES
L"
COLORADO RESeDENTS TOP 1001 Pounds Recycied Per Person
T he trend continues! Colorado continues Aluminum, Glass, NewPaper & Plastic
to exceed the national per capita average
for recycling. Coloradoans have fopped 120
the per capita recycling figures for the eighth
straight year, with the average Colorado resident N 100 101.80
recycling more than 100 pounds per person for the a
first time ever. ~ $o 89.80
More than 885 million pounds of aluminum and ~ cF
steel cans, glass newspaper, plastic, cardboard, and ~ so
office papers were returned for recycling in the state ~
last year based on Colorado Recycles' annual cn ao
recycling survey conducted by the University of ~Colorado at Boulder's Recycling Services. 0 20
The average Colorado family of four recycled -
more than 405 pounds of materials in 1994 (101.84 0
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
pounds per person, well above the national
average of 89.75 pounds per person). The per
person aVerage represents an increase of eight U.S. Average Colorado Average
pounds over 1993. In Colorado there was an "
Year U.S. Average Colorado Average
increase of nine percent over 1993, while, nationally,
the increase was only two percent. 1987 59.6
Recyciing of steel food and beverage cans 1988 68z
showed the greatest increase in volume, up more 1989 61.6 76.3
1990 73.42 87.2
than 80 percent over 1993. Glass food and 1991 eo so
beverage containers and old phone books had the 1992 es.s 95.4
next highest increases. Newspaper recycling 1593 a~.2, 93.3
1994 898 101.8
increased another 15 miilion pounds, continuing a
trend established two years ago. Newspaper
recycling has a tendency to follow market prices
for scrap newsprint. Prices paid at the end of 1994
were very high. The 1994 figures also inciude . r=; ; - . ; ~ .
polystyrene foam and plastic shrink wrap,
commodities not included in previous surveys. ~
~
Pri~nced on recycled paper
~ 50 /o recycled content
10% Post-consumer waste
CJ ' SPONSORED 8 Y COLORADO+ RECYCLESrv
COLORADO RECYCLES "It's 11Vhat To Do VVhen You Finish A Good Book..:'O Recycle!
BOARD OF DIRECTORS t's a lot like the holidays - it arrives every year whether you're ready or not!
President: Chuck Dunnebacke What IS It? The U S WEST Direct White and Yellow Pages. In Colorado ,
Golden Aluminum Company alone, U S WEST Direct publishes 52 directory titles! While everybody loves to
Vice President: Millie Steeves get their new, updated books, many people wonder what to do with the old
Ciry Market, ino. ones.
Lia Garcia, recycling manager for U S WEST Direct, says "Whatever you
Treasurer: Jim Fisher
Ball Corporation do, don't throw your old phone book away. We have 16 telephone directory
recycling events, throughout Colorado, covering 39 directory titles. These
Secretary: Bob McNamara events target more than 99 percent of the paper we distribute in Colorado:"
Columbine Beverage Company U S WEST Direct's concern for the environment prompted the beginning of
Charles Bayley its directory recycling endeavors in 1990. The company now has successful
Waste Management closed-loop recycling events throughout its 14-state service area. "Although
Lynn canison telephone directories make up less than one percent of landfills, even that one
Mile High Accounting Service percent of our resources should not be wasted;" says Garcia.
BobCase Garcia explains that U S WEST Direct has closed the loop on recycling by
Browning Ferris Industries turning old phone bobks back into new phone books. Beginning in August
sean Crowell 1992, U S WEST Direct began shipping old telephone directories to a paper mill
Pepsi Cola specifically designed to recycle telephone directories. This facility is technically
Gail Ederer advanced in re-manufacturing outdated telephone directories into recycled
Glass Packaging Institute directory paper. The new directories contain a minimum of 25 percent.post-
consumer material. Using this closed-loop process allows U S WEST Direct to
Lloyd Frazier turn old phone books into new phone books over and over again.
Full Service Beverage Company "Since 1990, we have collected more than 55,000 tons of outdated directories
Betsy Giles and our efforts continue to grow. In Colorado, we
Miller Brewing COmpany
collected more than 793 tons of outdated directo- Y
Willie A. Hunt ries in 1995 - with results from our largest effort, in , f• 1wa
Nor-ColoDistributing Denver, still pending. We are leading the tele- .~r aQw
Ss~c
Ss
KateJohnson phone directory publishing in our recycling efforts, " T hall~ ,g~ ~ss
League of Women Voters Garcia adds.
Don Kneass Garcia thanks the thousands of Coloradoans
NAPCOR who have taken the time to recycle their old ,~:'d
RollieLockhart directories in 1995. She also thanks their Denver Coca Cola community partners who help collect outdated
directories and promote their not-for-profit
Eric Lombardi
Eco-Cycie environmental communitY service recYclin9 events.
Garcia urges you, your friends, neighbors and businesses to recycle their
Hal Louder outdated directories. Just watch for the instructions on the special insert that
Anheuser-Busch, ino. comes with your new directory. If you need more information on the l1 S WEST
Shayne Madsen Direct oid phone book recycling events, please call 1-800-422-1234.
Anheuser Busch Companies Inc.
Kristi McVey ' Trademark of U S WEST Marketing Resources Group
, COORS Brewing Company
Steve Morris
McDonald's of Aurora ~
Ralph Powell
. e:
King Soopers, Inc. News To Re-Use is published by Colorado Recycles, a
Jeffrey Stroh nonprofit educational organization established in 1983 to
Sateway, Inc. promote recycling in Colorado.
Ben Walker Duplication of contents is encouraged with proper credit
Steei Recycling Institute and a copy sent to Colorado Recycles.
.
Jim Wexels
Public Service Company of Colorado Colorado Recycles, 8745 W. 14th Avenue, Suite #216,
Dianne Beal ' Lakewood, CO 80215, (303) 231-9972
Executive Director
. _
. _ . _ _ , . .
Page 2
, - - o - -
RIGClf CLEIf"1 OF tl HIG HEP'iR tltllltlltlEIfTJ H01tlORGD
A total of 7 programs 0 Has a new management SPECIAL MERIT AIMARD FOR
recieved honors in the course on environmental OUTSTANDING COMMITNiERIT
Calorado Recycies' 11th business issues, resort TO RECYCLIftIG
annuaf Recycfer of the Year recycling tours and
Awards. The 1995 winners come environmental hikes. THE DENVER POST
from all areas of the state and
represent everything from a grass PRESIDENT'S AVIJARD 0 Continuously supports of
roots rural cooperative to big recycling and Colorado
business resort recycling. A special award given to a Recycles.
Foliowing are some of the program that goes above and 0 Sponsors "June is Recycling
highlights from the award beyond in recycling. Month:"
winning programs. 0 Delivers Colorado Recycle's
BOULDER COMMUNITY annual Recycling Guide to
OVERALL RECYCLER HOSPITAL over 400,000 subscribers,
OF'THE YEAR design and layout, and
0 Through a grant from the donates 25,000 extra copies
RALSTON RESORTS . Governor's Office of to distribute.
(Breckenridge, Arapahoe Energy Conservation, the 0 Print annual Recycling
Basin and Keystone) hospital is working with Sweepstakes.
Colorado State University 0 Implemented the Read, Ride
• Fast becoming a leader in to create a program that and Recycle program with
resort recycling. would teach other RTD. The program recycles
• As of June, 1995, their hospitals how to recyle and oVer 260 tons of newspapers.
volume of recyclables had reduce waste. 0 Employees recycle newsprint,
increased 20% over 1994, ~ Recycling program has more cardboard, and aluminum
• {ncreased collection route than doubled its collection cans.
to over 65 areas, some with of items over the past year. 0 Uses recycled paper in their
custom-built co!lection newsprint.
centers using recycled
PLASTI- FENCE. BEST SCHOOL
• Recycles from the remote RECYCLIiVG PROGRAM
areas using the snow-cats
RECYCLE COLORADO STATE
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
Recycle over 5000 cubic
yards of material each year -
close to 20 percent of the
schools trash.
and gondolas 2000 feet ~ Since June of 1994, recycled
above Keystone. ~ Program collects cardboard, over 763 tons of aluminum,
• Recycles woodwaste from glass, metafs, paper milk glass, plastic, tin, phonebooks,
constuction projects, use containers, plastics, blue cardboard, laser printer
recycled building products insulation foam, kitchen oil cartridges, mixed office paper,
and incorporate sustainable and grease, motor oil, office newspaper, computer
principles into their design. pak, printer ribbons, reusable printout, magazines and
• Participates in the EPA's gowns, medical equipment polystyrene.
Green Lights energy and supplies, food, sutures, ~ This fall implementing a new,
conservation program. saline botties, silver from x- Integrated Solid Waste
• Purchases recycled products rays, and other medicai items. Management program which
from office materials to fleece 0 Recycling program has top will increase recycling, reduce
garments and uniforms. And, down support. off campus dumping, and
switched to non-toxic cleaners 0 Employee education is largest save 15% of the cost of
for housekeeping. component of the program. waste management.
; „ . . . _ . , , , , , . „ , . , , . g
Pa e 3
• Implementing a composting o Hires at-risk youths through ATTENTIOiV
program to manage the straw the Governor's Office of RECYCLIiNG
generated from the Colorado Energy Conservation's Youth WRITERS
state Veterinary Teaching Energy Alternatives Project.
Hospital. Hope to divert aving ~
3,000 cubic yards from the INDIVIDUAL EXCELLENCE trouble
landfill. IN RECYCLING H finding time to research
and write an article for your
BEST COMMERCIAL PAULA VOLKIN newsletter or newspaper?
RECYCLING PROGRAM Colorado Recycles can help you
o Initiated a unique collabora- provide recycling iniormation to
ARAMARK, MESA VERDE tive partnership with the your readers without using your
Boulder Community Hospi- staff time to research and write
• In 1994, began recycling for tal, the Governor's Office of that article. the lodge, campground, the Energy Conservation, and Colorado Recycles publishes
camp store, and the two Colorado State University to a monthly column that is available
cafeterias and giftshops in study hospital waste source free to any editor in the state.
Mesa Verde National Park. reduction, recycling and to Topics in 1995 ranged from
• Recycles aluminum, glass, conduct educational pro- source reduction and composting
plastic, steel, cardboard, grams. to fun facts and results of
newspapers, office, and 0 Conducted pre- and post- Colorado's annual recycling
computer paper. recycling surveys. survey.
• Utilizes supply truck to bring 0 Developed educational You are welcome to use any.
recyclables to a warehouse in displays. issue of the column in its entirety,
Mancos. Brings full 0 Obtained top management word for word, or you may modify
truckloads to Cortez and support of her programs and it to include local information.
Farmingdale. provided staff incentives. Colorado Recycles distributes
• Garbage disposal costs have the monthly column free of
~ been lowered. charge, thanks to our generous
• Encourages local businesses sponsors. The 1995 columns
to participate. BELow: coiorado Recycies' soard . were sponsored by City Market,
• Instal(ing a baler to collect Member Millie Steeves (left) of City the Colorado SOft Driflk
cardboard from local Market presents the Special.Merit::; ASSOCIatiOft, and The Kroger
businesses. a,ward co Geri nneyers (rignt) or Tne Foundation. Call Dianne Beal
Denver Post. See page 3 for more 1 at COIOrado ReCyCles,
BEST i110iv-PROFlT on the award. (303)231-9972 to be added to
the distribution list.
RECYCLING PROGRAM
SUMMIT RECYCLING PROJECT < > - -
, 0 ; ~
o Seeks and obtain grants and
other funding to purchase
:
new equipment.
0 Processes over 800 tons of
recyclables per year. •
0 Assists in county-wide
recycling amounting to over
3600 tons of recyclables.
o ~
Diverts over 20 different
materials, recently began
k ` r I
diverting wood waste.
Collects green glass for use
;
as aggregate. . ~
~ Drop-off hours extended for
residents' convenience.
_a r
Page 4
~
l~
.
f ~ ~ • LEFT: Colorado Recycles' Board
President Chuck Dunnebacke pre-
sents Overall Recycler of the Year
ward to representatives of Ralston
Resorts. RalstonResorts inciude
k G ~ ~ x Y`
Keystone, Breckenridge and Arapa-
I-M
~
hoe Basin.
N ~ .F.. .
P t ~
. 9
/ .
.
~
< ,
• .
L6
~ ~
PETE HDPE V LDPE PP PS OTHER
Poly ethylene High•Densiti Vinrl Low•Densih Polypropylene Polystyrene AllOfherResins
Terephthalale PolYelhYlene PolytiinYl Chloride Polyethylene and Layered
IPETI IPVCI ,Wuiti•macerial
LOI.'RTESY OF COLORADO RECI'CLES COLORADO A-,- RECYCLES
\4an
recydrrs accept botdes labeled I or aZ only~, plrase". ° .
~ Y \
,
Cn
~
' : . e.
: ' . " .
RIGHT Colorado Recycles Board : t:Ijij
r ~
Member"Jim fisher presents the
.
Best Indrviduai Recycler award to + ~ E I
_ Paula Volkin.:,.,
..n'v:.. .
?
, . . .
; .
(
Page 5
M1rURKETSaoo MARKETS000 M(/'llRKETNJooo
from landfills, while complementing national recycling
efforts. Coloradoans recycled close to 130 tons of
~ steel food and beverage cans alone in 1994.
In 1994, Americans recycled 53 percent of alf steel
cans used. SRI has set a goal to reach 66 percent
~ recycling rate for steel cans. If Americans recycle at
least 95 of the average 144 steel cans they use each
" year.(including food cans, empty paint and aerosol
cans and other common household containers), the
steel industry will reach its goal. The Super Recycling
~ Sweepstakes is just one of many SRI consumer
outreach initiatives aimed at increasing recycling. The
initiatives have led to a number of lasting partnerships.
Nationally, grocery prize packages were pro-
SUPER REGYCLING Sd1/EEPSTAKES vided by major food brand sponsors, including
Borden, Del Monte, Hunt Wesson, Kal Kan Foods,
Inc., Faultless/Bon Ami, Pillsbury/Green Giant,
R ecycle a steel can and it could come back as a S&W Fine Foods, S. C. Johnson Wax and Tri Valley
new car. Or it may have come back as $1000 Growers (Libby's).
in free groceries. That's the spin on the "Super For more information on the Super Recycling
Recycting Sweepstakes" that hit Denver this September Sweepstakes or steel recycling in your area, contact
and October. The program targe4ed consumer Ben Walker, SRI's southwest regional recycling
awareness and recycling participation with a manager, at 823 Congress Avenue, Suite 1104,
sweepstakes format through which consumers were Austin, TX 78701. (512 472-3276.
awarded a grocery prize package or the grand prize - a For infiormation on locations to recycle steel cans,
1995 Jeep Wrang{er. call the steel recycling hotline at 1-800-YES-I-CAN.
The radio promotion, sponsored by King Soopers,
KOSI-FM, Chicken of the Sea, Jeep Eagle, the Steel
Recycling Institute (SRI) and major food brands in cities
throughout the United States and Canada, provided
consumers with a series of high-interest recycling tips
to reinforce the need for steel recycling. ~ 99~ ~~`~Q`
As part of the a SHOWS
sweepstakes, consumers ~ qpQ 9NCF3EASE
were urged to peel the IN GLASS
label from steel cans, use Glass 9~ COi~TAIi~IEFi
~h~ f~~ the labels as entry forms, Packa in
~ Institute @~~CVCLIi~G
~ rinse the cans and place
the cans and other
recyciables into a
recycling bin. The label
was then dropped into merican consumers are recycling glass
displays at Front A containers at a faster rate than ever
Range King Soopers or before. According to data from the Glass
Front Range Jeep and Eagle Dealerships, and the Packaging Institute (GPI) glass container recycling
steel cans were recycled at King Soopers' drop-off . increased to 37 percent. ~
recycling sites, other participating drop-off sites, or GPI reports the increase in 1994 marks seven
through curbside collection programs. consecutive years of recycling rate increases. In
The sweepstakes, which ran in selected markets Colorado alone, glass coniainer recycling increased
across the U.S., generated nearly 100 million consumer by more than 10 million tons over 1993. GP1 says .
impressions in the first four markets - Baltimore, the increase indicates that the g{ass industry's
Philadelphia, Houston, and Minneapolis. The consumer efforts to build a sustainable, national glass recy-
impressions lead to recycling. By recycling steel and cling infrastructure are proving successful. Glass
other materials, Coloradoans divert tons of materials recycling help lessen reliance on landfill Space and
Page 6
, ,
lltlllARKE0 Sooa IIDUARKETSnoo II190ARKE11 Sooa
bottMe is assumed to be used an average ot
eight times. The rate has varied slightly from
year to year.
0 Glass recycled in secondary markets. This
sum represents the gross tonnage of recycled
containers recycled in the United States.
The gross tonnage is then divided by the sum of the
following numbers which represent net domestic sales:
~ y • Sotal domestic production of glass containers
as reflected in Department of Commerce and
mdustry figures.
• Net imports or the sum of all imported
containers less exports.
Re ~ o Mateo The recycling rate for glass reflects ail types of glass
~ 9 containers including all food beverage, juice, beer,
6° es ffiemy wine, liquor, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic packaging.
For more information on glass recycling rates,
contact Gai! Ederer at GPI. Gail has a new address
and phone number: 1301 Broad Acres Drive,
Norman, OK 73072. (405)447-9955.
reduces the need for virgin materials. Additionatly,
growth in glass recycling results in increased . ~
energy savings, criticaf reductions in air emissions
and helps maintain high paying, skilled employment
for glass container industry workers, and creates Gsass Recytlang Rate
jobs in the reCyCling IndUStfy. Percentage Of i'slass Containers Recyded In The U.S.
GPI notes that the 37 percent glass recycling rate
reflects the percentage of containers actually being
recycled by manufacturers, not just the amount
collected. The recycling rate inciudes aii jars and
bottles sold. Glass is also bein used in secondar ,
9 Y
markets such as fiberglass and glasphalt. - -
Unfortunately, failure of many material - -
-;;recovery facilities to produce a high quality cullet is 22% 24% 2s/e 31°Ja 33% 35% 37%
jeopardizing the growth in the volume of containers
recycled. If recycled glass is not contaminant free and
color separated, the material cannot be used in making
h.
new glass containers.
IhM dma i~pmm~ An M~.q roh Iw ~ Gb++ tan~d+rt Ai«daA diaAd ne~ bwd h ~on9akan aNh otMr palviynq mntntds Ae~ memma
. . . . , . . , _ , . : . . , . . . . aro qp o lood w bmrepr einafnv.
If recycled glass as not contaminant fre.e.
and color' separated;' the materiul cannat
beused in making new glass containers.
RECLAIMER INCREASES
GPI determined its recycling rate by using the MA+RKET FLEXIBILtTY
• following procedure.
Total recycled glass includes: AConsumer rmed with an aggressive plan for expansion -
• Totai cuilet purchases by the glass industry. and a healthy dose of pioneering spirit-
• Refillable bottles are caiculated at a trippage Plastics Recycling (CPR), of
rate of eight times for 1994. This means, for Denver, is now filling a much needed role in the
the purposes of this ca4culation, each refillable Rocky Mountairs. CPR is a reclaimer. Adding a
Page 7
MARKETS00o I1011!/1i11 LLKETSooo I1tl11A0 IlKETSooo
versatile receiving system and a new densifier for million KWH ene`rgy saved; and, laid end-to-end, the
film and polystyrene has established CPR as a very books would stretch for about 219 miles. '
important link between supply and demand in this More than 95 percent of the phone books collected
region. Those additions have also given CPR an by U S WEST Direct are turned into paper used in new
opportunity to accept post-consumer plastics from directories. The remainder are turned into other
a wider variety of sources and the flexibility to paper products.
capitalize on broader ranges of marketing opportunities.
For example, the
Denver area features
a number of potential o
r~
markets for CPR's
post- consumer flake. In fact, three of the
I I I nation's four slip sheet
manufacturers are =y
based in the Denver
area. One of these
I I I companies, Repsco,
worked closely with
CPR in developing PAPER iNDUSTRY CAPACITY
I~ I product specifications STILL GFiOVVIiVIG
for the recovered
material. CPR also Aindustry ccording to the American Forest and Paper
purchased an optional Association (AFPA), the U.S. pulp and paper
baffle that allows their expects to increase its capacity
densifier to be used investments during the 1995-1998 period. The AFPA
for polystyrene. The densifier was purchased with has projected a four-year average annual growth rate of
grant from the American Plastics Council's Technical 2.5 percent for paper and board. That average is the
Assistance Program. The densifier produces same as the average achieved from 1985-2004.
batches of densified flake thaf can be mixed with The AFPA categorized the capaciry expansions into
virgin resin in extrusion applicatio'ns. two categories: new machines and net improvements.
CPR is able to bale or densify collected Net improvements includes rebuilds, grade shifts and
plastics. That gives CPR the flexibility to take miscellaneous improvements. Fifty-six percent of the
advantage of market opportunities as they arise. CPR anticipated paper and board capacity increase is
accepts plastics in loose truckloads, mixed or source expected to come from improvements.
separated bales or compacted roll-off containers. CPR Total U.S. capacity for all paper will increase to
can service everyone from smaller communities lacking 103.1 million tons in 1998. That will be up more than
compaction equipment to sophisticated source 10 million tons from 1994. Additionally, the paper
separated collection operations. recovery rate is also expected to climb this year to
Need more information? Call Joe Lefferdink at 44 percent, up from 41 percent in 1994. The indus-
CPR, (303)295-3577. try may just meet its recovery goal of 50 percent by
the year 2000.
OLD PI-aOiVE BOOK RECVCLIN(a' Nj)00
D RFC`s-
uring 1995, cumulative Colorado telephone g C~~
directory recycling drives have collected and
-
recycled more than 793 tons or 1.58 million
pounds. The total is expected to reach approximately
:~<~;_~i~ .
2,500 tons or 5 million pounds of used directories.
That 2,500 tons translates into 42,500 trees saved;
8,250 cubic yards of landfill space saved; 8,750 barrels
of oil saved; 17.5 million gallons of water saved; 10.25
. , _ , . : .
Page 8
'naEDUCE that describe these successful
REU5E source reduction programs being
~iECYCL~ imp{emented at the community
level or in conjunction with
industry.
R I I I educing is the most ~~~ching
important part of the solid
waste management mowers
hierarchy. Often it gets ~~~~~~e gTass
overlooked. Many times source
NAPCOR reduction programs don't get ClippIlngS Ilnt(D
SER'VICE BUREA4.? funding either, as programs can
have benefits can be difficult to ~extihzerso
measure. ft may, therefore, be hard
he NAPCOR Service to "selP" the program to decision
Bureau is a one-stop makers in both business and
shop dedicated to starting government. We must learn to
or improving your PET recycling incoroprate "cost-avoidance"
programs. The Service Bureau figures and be a little creative.
provides a series of teaching tools Source reduction programs ~
you can tailor to fit your needs. are not impossible to implement. `
Best of all, they're free! There are also many programs
The Service Bureau has free out there that we can learn from.
brochures, a TV PSA, a radio PSA, For example, the City of Lafayette
bus signs or otFier outdoor signs, implemented a"Let It Lie°
editorial articles and timeline tips. program for grass clippings. The
To sign up caif Quinn city provides a$5 rebate on
Davidson, NAPCOR's director of purchases of mulching mower
communications, at (704)358- blades and mulching lawn
8882 or complete and mail the mowers.
following form. ~~RAL
PoOeoooppppee~ RECYCLIfVG
COUNCIL
~gl~l U[~~??
0 ow Do ~D
C~
~ Wanc a winning recyding program? It's easy
~ and ic's free' Simply FiU ouc and send in this B ~ he National Recycling
Q Form Eor information on NAPCOR Service Coalition's Rural Recycling
~ Bureau macerials. Or call Quinn Davidson> TCouncil (RRC) wants help
to facilitate and increase
p Ni1PCOR's director of communications, at
~ 704/358-8832. materials, conservation, waste
~.x,..
reduction, composting and
Q Yes, . Please send my a NAPCOR 0
Service Bureau Introductory Kit recycling in rural areas and smail
towns throughout Colorado and
~ NP.iME: 0 If you know of a local the U.S.
government source reduction Colorado is lucky to have a
~ TITLE: ~ program, please call Pat representative of that council
0 ADDRESS: ~ McClearn at Colorado Hospitals right here in our state. !f you
8
CITY: for a Heaithy Environment, would like more information
~ (303)758-1630. Pat is a member about RRC and its activities,
. ~ STATE: ZIP: ~ of the National Recycling contact Sandy Sturm at The
~ PH. NUMBER: 0 Coalition's Source Reduction _ Energy Office, 128 S. 5th, Grand
~ DATE: ~ Forum. The group is charged with Junction, CO 81501. (Yes,
promoting successful source Sandy has moved from United
~ Please mail m: NAI'COR SerVice Bureau, NAI'COR, 3770 ~ reduction programs taking place at Waste to The Energy Office.)
~\'acionsBankCorporatcCenrer, IOON.Tr}•onSaeec, ~ the local government level. Sandy's phone number is
Cliacloae, NC 25202 or Eax co 704/353-8769 The are coliectin case studies
~ooooo0000000~ Y q (970)241-2871.
. , . Page 9
L] cJ elJ CJ s LI f7 omo 0 0 YOvR TO'"
~
u
ews from ...YOUR TOWN will return in the next issue of News To Re-Use. We encourage all areas of the
state to call or write with information about what's happening in your area. Our readers love to get the
N
scoop, catch up on news or learn new ideas from others. Colorado Recycles, 8745 West 14th Avenue,
Suite 216, Lakewood, Colorado, 80215-4850, (303)231-9972.
\~A7~(r ` °-~r' sr. •m•
J9, x
RENEdV COlOraudo
T he Colorado Housing and Finance Authority
(CHFA) has announced revisions made to the
Recycling Loan Program. The first change is a
new name. RENEW Colorado was chosen to
emphasize the broader goal of the program. The
program was developed to finance the implementation
of waste diversion activities and recycling strategies oin City Market, Colorado Recycles, Garden
in Colorado - not,just recycling. Centers of Colorado, King Soopers, Public
Additionally, loan terms have been lengthened and ' Service Company, The Colorado Springs Gazette,
the maximum loan amounts have been increased. and Waste Management in supporting the American .
Now there is more flexibility to better address the Lung Association of Colorado's annual Trade for Shade
borrower's needs. Potential borrowers who were not program to be held on Saturday, April 27, 1996, from
eligible before may be now. Give CHFA a call and 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
check it out. Trade for Shade is a community-wide environmental
If you need more information, a loan application, or education program that encourages recycling and tree
a presentation of the program to you or your organiza- planting as one way to improve air quality. The public
tion, contact Jake Danaher, Commercial Programs is invited to trade in a three-foot stack of newspapers
Officer at CHFA, (303)297-7327. for a free tree certificate at one of twelve Colorado
Trade for Shade sites.
For information on how you, your school or your
organization can participate, please call
P
- (303)388-4327 or 1-800-LUNG-USA:
~`D°
G AMERICAN
0 LUNG
ASSOCIATIOiVo
of Colorado =
Page 10
a
~
COL~RAD~ ~~~CLES
8745 West 14th Avenue, Suite 216 ~ Lakewood, CO 80215-4850 ~(303) 231-9972
Colorado Recycles is a non-profit, 501(C)(3) educational organization, dedicated to making
Coloradans aware of why, where, and how they can recycle aluminum and steel cans, glass
and plastic containers, newspaper, and other valuable materials.
Our awareness and education campaigns are made possible by the support of businesses and
individuals like you. If you would like to help us continue our many activities that promote
voluntary recycling, comp(ete the membership form below and mail it today with your tax deduct-
ible contribution to Colorado Recycles, 8745 W. 14th Ave., #216, Lakewood, CO 80421-4850.
COLORADO RECYCLES SUGGESTED 1996 MEMBERSHIP CONTRIBUTION LEVELS
Colorado Recycles Federal Tax Identification # 84-0932949
PATRON: Contributions of $2500.00 and above
SUSTAINING SPONSORS:
Gold - Contributions of $1000.00 to $2499.00
Silver - Contributions of $750.00 to $999.00
Bronze - Contributions of $500.00 to $749.00
ASSOCIATE: • Contributions of $250.00 to $499.00
GENERAL: Contributions of $100.00
INDIVIDUAL: Contributions of $25.00
NON-PROFIT: Contributions of $25.00
GOVERNMENT: Contributions of $25.00
fVame
Organization
Phone/Fax
Mailing Address
City State Zip Code ~-9-
Page 11
F,,,4.. ~~..:,v~ .,1."A• 7l'
57%
Y J.,
t
f:'R ~i. J .~t~ ,r~~`~ ~ ~ a i4 f ~ qJ.. + ~`7~ S'~
Yri ~
: ,x • v~ .z € ~ . ~ '
5 P O Pd 5 O R E D B Y C O L O R A D O it E C Y C L E 5
H ave you seen the great new Colorado Recycles logo yet? The color logo is especialfy eye
catching with its bright blue, red, yellow and white combination. We have a limited
quantity left. If you would like a sample, call Colorado Recycles, (303)231-9972.
We also have a limited number of black and white "slicks" of the COLORADO LOVES
RECYCLING logo and other graphics found in this newsletter available free of charge.
- ~ - _
%•'~'r ~ ` ' E_,j ± ; ~ . - - - , , :
~ I~ - ~ i•, .
CoB~~ado RecycBes
~ ~r„
8745 W. 14th Avenue, #216 ~
Lakewood, CO 80215-4850
Forwarding & Return Postage Guaranteed .
Address Correction Requested
in this issue... peqqy Osterfos ayor(
Town .Of V '
5urvey results V5 So Frontage Road West
, CO 81657
Recycl er of the Year awards ~~~~~~~D MAR I
Market news
~
' ee
e4
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Itoad
Vail, Colorado 81657.
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
MEDEiA ADVISORlf
, March 13, 1996
Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information Office
VA?L TOWN COUNC9L HBCFiL9GHTS FOR MARCH 12
Work Sessuon Bruefs
Council members present: Armour, Foley, Ford, Jewett, Johnston, Kurz, Navas
--Update on Eagle iViine Clean-Up
During a progress report, Gene Taylor of the Environmental Protection Agency said the .
clean-up of the former mine is about 90 percent complete. The EPA, Colorado
Department of Health and the mine's former owner, Viacom, are working collectively to
finish work on the site. The mine, south of Minturn, was named a Superfund site in
1988. Taylor said between $50 and $60 million has been spent on corrective actions,
thus far. lmpacts from the mine have included: high heavy metal concentrations in the
Eagle River and near elimination of fish populations within 3 to 4 miles downstream of
the mine. The clean-up has included plugging the mine, development of a water
treatment plant to address seepage from the mine, capping the tailings pile next to
iViinturn Middle School, assessments showing no health risk to iVINiS schoolchildren
and the monitoring of aquatic life in the Eagle River, which has improved dramatically,
Taylor said. Also, the concentration of inetal contaminants in the river has declined
over the past five years. Taylor said a second risk assessmenfi will be perFormed fihis summer to identify possible risks to "casual trespassers" in the Gilman area. However,
fihe study won't apply to redevelopment of Gilman as a residential area, he said. In
addition, Taylor said the clean-up team is identifying concerns regarding railroad .
= abandonment pcoceedings. He said a 3;to 4 mile area surrounding Beldon is of
greatest concern to health officials if the line should become a recreational trail or bike
path. Several buildings associated with the mine are located there and are
contaminated with asbestos and other materials, he said. For more information,
contact Russell Forrest in the Community Development Department at 479-2146.
--Council Long Term Strategy and Goal Setting (continued from Feb. 27 session)
0 Debt Refinancing
The C.ouncil agreed to continue researching the possibility of refinancing $15 million of
the town's debt after reviewing the pros and cons with Peter Zent, a local financial
advisor. When the debt was refinanced in 1992 by the town, payments on the principle
were postponed for 4 to 5 years to free-up cash for additional capital projects between
~more~
R CYCLED APER
~
Council Highlights/Add 1 1993 and 1996. Those projects have included the Golf Course and Matterhorn street
reconstruction projects, the roundabaut and the purchase of new buses. As a result,
accelerated debt service payments af more than $3 million per year between the years
2000 and 2005 will compete with town capital projects during those years, according to
Town Manager Bob McLaurin. However, the town would essentially be debt free after
2006. Afthough the debt does not impact day-to-day operations of the town, debt
service does compete with capital projects, McLaurin said. By restructuring up to $15
million of the town's current $24 million debt, annual payments would be more evenly
distributed, according to Zent. However, payments would be extended another three
years. The restructuring scenario could free-up about $3.5 million over a 10-year
period to supplement capital improvements at a present value cost of just under $1
_ million, Zent said. However, Council members agreed the town must determine if the
benefit of the additional cash flow outweighs the additional cost of extending the debt.
Councilman Mike Jewett, who said he was "outraged" by the 1992 restructuring, said
he was not inclined to support a second refinancing. However, most Council members
said they supported reviewing as many options as possible. Councilman Paul
Johnston said the town may need to look to the community to help with the flattening
revenue situation, possibly in the form of special assessment districts. For more
information, contact Finance Director Steve Thompson at 479-2116.
• Transportation
In preparation for the next Regional Transportation Authority meeting, the Council
agreed to continue its support of the railroad abandonment proceedings, although there
was a reluctancy to contribute additional funds toward the effort. Also, the Council
received a lukewarm reaction from Public Works/Transportation Director Larry Grafel
when asked if the town would be interested in bidding on operation of the new regional
transportation system. Town Manager Bob McLaurin suggested delaying a decision
until the town reviews the RFP (request for proposals) from the Transportation
, Authority. The Council aiso agreed ta explore the concept of park and ride lots and.to
-continue discussions on parking rates in the two parking structures. Standard Parking
of Chicago, one of the leaders in the parking business, has been contracted by the
town to review Vail's parking operatians, council members were told. A report is
expected in the next 30 days. In addition to numerous rate and merchant validation
ideas, several Council members said the town, itself, should actively promote its free
parking options, particularly the three hours of free evening parking. Council member
Sybill Navas suggested the town become more involved in issues surrounding the
Eagle County Regional Airport and DIA.
• Infrastructure
Addressing the West Vail Interchange was given highest priority by the Council. Other
possible projects included: left turn lanes on the Frontage Road; negotiating a possible
maintenance for the Frontage Roads with the Colorado Department of Transportation;
Seibert Circle; renovation of the Transportation Center terminal; West Vail Fire Station;
loading and delivery changes; perforining arts center/community center; and Golden
Peak to Ford Park access on Vail Valley Drive. Regarding the fire station issue, Town
Manager Bob McLaurin said he's asked Fire Chief Dick Duran to take one more {ook at
(more)
~ .
p
Councii Highlights/Add 3
Discussion of Red Sandstone Emptoyee Housing Project
Discussion of Vail Commons Lottery/Details/Schedules/Deed Restrictions/Timeline
Discussion of Ordinance, Phase 1 Design Review Revisions
March 99 Evening Meefing
First Reading, Ordinance Change in Municipal Code re: Appeals
First Reading, Ordinance Phase 1 Design Review Revision
First Reading, Ordinance to Amend Design Review Board Terms
Second Reading, Ordinance Cornice Building Special Development District Niajor
Amendment
Request to Amend Golden Peak Ski Base Development Operational Management Plan
March 26 Work Session
Cinda Rau 10 Year Anniversary
PEC/DRB Review
Library Update
Revisit Towrn Council Appointments
Discussion of Vail Valley fVlarketing Board & Housing Authority Benefits
Housing
Executive Session
April 2 Vllork Session
Site Visit, Glen Lyon Office Building
` April 2 Evening Meeting
First Reading, Ordinance Plumbing and Electrical Code
First Reading, Ordinance Glen Lyon Office Building
Second Reading, Ordinance Zoning Change
Second Reading, Ordinance Phase 1 Design Review Revisions
Second Reading, Ordinance Design Review Board Term Change
Proclamation, Take Our Daughters to Work Day
Award Certificates of Appreciation to Board and Commission iViembers
~
~
~
Council Highlights/Add 2
the possibility of relocating the two existing fire stations.to provide increased coverage
without the expense of a third fire station. Although McLaurin said he's not backing
away from a third fire station, he says he wants to review all options.
• Vail's Governing Philosophy for Development Review
The Councit embraced the concept of adopting a resolution which would set the tone
for a kinder and gentler development review process. The new and improved approach
. will be announced at the town's annual Construction Kick=off gathering with architects,
developers and contractors on March 28.
Also yesterday, saying it consumes too much time on the part of the applicant and staff,
the Council agreed to begin a process to eliminate or modify Vail's GRFA (gross
residential floor area) requirements. Next, Bob McLaurin presented an overview of a
. grassroots plan by the Vail Community Task Force to develop a strategic action plan
for the community. He said the Task Force would be coming to the Council soon to
make a formal presentation.
--Information Update Assistant Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer announced creation of a scholarship
program administered by Signature Homes and the John Roeland family for Battle
Mountain High School seniors in memory of Katie Elizabeth Roeland. A$1,000 college
scholarship will be awarded each year ($4,000 total) to an outstanding student who has
received a:3.0 minimum grade point average and who has lettered in three sports
during his or her four years of high school. Applicants must be attending an accredited
four year college. The deadline for submission to the Battle Mountain High School
- guidance counselor is Aprif 18.
--Council Reports
Sybill Navas said the Special Events Commission will be gathering event planners
soon to compare notes on upcoming events and how to incorporate those events into
the Vail Valley Marketing Board's program. Bob Armour and Rob Ford joined Bob McLaurin in Denver for a meeting of the
Colorado Association of Ski Towns (CAST) and a luncheon with the state legislators.
While there, they also met with staff members from the Colorado Municipal League.
Kevin Foley said he's continuing.to attend meetings of the Eagle County Transportation
Authority and will report on the Council's transportation discussions at the next
meeting. "
~ # # #
UPCOMING DISCUSSION TOPICS
March 19 Work Session Art in Public Places Discussion, Kathy Langenwalter (more)
SALES TAX RECEIPTS LAST UPDATE 13-Mar-96
VAIL % ASPEN % STEAMBOAT % BRECKEN• % FRISCO % AVON % CRESTED % MTCRESTED % DILLON %
SPRING3 RIDGE BUTTE BUTTE
SELF INC. SELF INC. SELF INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF ING. STATE 4NC. SELF INC. STATE INC.
(40%) „(1.7%) (4.5%) l41/61 12%I (41i ) 140i 1 (40i ) (40/6)
JANUARV 1995 1,894,597 4.9% 646,515 0.9% 1,097,312 1.0°/0 936,978 2.3% 139,781 0.7% 313,193 12.5% 99,226 8.5% 187,145 1.0% 48,595 1.6%
FEBFUARY 1995 1,816,107 0.1% 639,840 0.7% 1,167,708 5.9% 986,519 5.9°l0 167,019 21S°/o 296,623 12.8% 131,004 14.4% 206,682 -6.0% 49,181 •0.3% MARCH 1995 2,139,298 -4.9% 747,349 12% 1,366,934 •0J% 1,130,691 -92% 218,594 5.4% 373,955 10.4% 156,193 32% 279,753 3J°!o 64,267 -18.0%
APRIL1995 791,092 -0.4% 294,844 11.1% 459,409 •32% ~ 549,690 6.9% 127,866 8.0% 226,920 10.9% 49,457 33.7% 44,110 51.8°1a 34,461 14.8%
MAY 1995 324,681 13.0% 181,040 -14.4°!a 375,600 •1.4% 253,042 13.3% 122,042 26.3% 200,814 6.5% 51,681 14.8% 14,273 15.9% 23,059 31.5%
JUNE 1995 590,685 7.6% 361,656 7.1% 599,035 9.9% 365,542 6.8% 142,751 9.0% 267,828 16.6% 92,771 0.6°/e 35,711 58.40/6 26,473 -9.4%
JUtY 1995 893,483 0.1% 507,033 -8.4% 709,431 3.6% 584,851 14.8% 166,700 -14.5% 286,059 4.6% 139,921 -14.1% 54,613 •9.6% 47,438 39.5%
AUGUST 1995 861,125 -2.73'0 515,942 0.6% 668,032 -1.9% 516,707 10.0°!o 168,585 13.5% 285.095 7.6% 141,640 1.9% 52,783 •0.3% 36,376 182%
SEPTEMBER 1995 645,902 •10.9% 381,425 -0.9% 703,552 92Mo 410,605 14.2% 174267 8.5% 268,473 112% 108,751 -0.5°! 35,714 15.6% 30,573 6.7%
OCTOBER 1995 461,791 13.1% 229,086 7.3°/0 462,000 2.33'0 290,660 7.5% 126,571 82% 222,532 -1.3% 65,482 6.2% 20,062 -15.39'a 26,289 35.3%
NOVEMBER 1995 611,147 2.6% 225,664 -13.9% 457.026 12% 372,774 -7S°/ 131,246 2.5°l0 260,955 5.3% 15,164 10.6% 65,061 33.0% 29256 31.3%
DECEMBER 1995 1,994,540 0.1% 727,059 -1.3% 1,182,828 1.03'0 1,017,163 6.0% 226,521 6.80/6 446,892 6.6% 147,442 O.t°fo 209,123 -6.40% 68,406 31.6%
13,030,448 0.2% 5,457,453. -0.6% 9,269,067 22°/0 7,415,222 3.6°/ 1,933,963 72% 3,449,339 87% 1,259,332 32% 1,205,230 22% 480,374 10.9%
JANUARY 1996 1,922,525 1.5% 678,756 5.0% 1,064A03 •12°! -100.0% -100.4°/0 316,534 1 J°lo -100.0% 180,885 •3.3% -100.0%
FEBRUARY 1996 •100.0% •100.0% -100.0% . •100.0% -100.0% -00.0% -100.0% -140.0°/0 -106.0°l0
MARCH 1996 -100.0°/0 -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0%
APRIL 1996 -100.0% •100.0% -100.0°1< •100.0°! -166.0% -100.0% •100.0% •104.0% •100.0%
MAY 1996 -100.0% -100.0% •140.0% •100.0% . -100.0% •100.0% -100.0% •100.0°fo •100.0%
JUNE 1996 -100.0°!0 •100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% •100.0%
JULY 1996 -100.0% -100.0% -140.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.00% -100.0% •100.0% •100.0%
AUGUST 1996 -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% •100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •104.4°1
SEPTEMBER 1996 -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -104.0% -100.0%
OCTOBEA 1996 -100.0% •100.0% •100.0% -100.0°Jo -100.0% -100.6% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0%
NOVEMBER 1996 -100.0% •100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% •100.0°/0 -100.Uqo
DECEMBER 1996 -100A% -100.0°Jo •100.0% -100.0% -100.0°6 -1W0% -104.0% •100.0% -100.0%
. _ . .
•--•---1,922,525 •852% 678,756 -81.6% 1,084,003 •88.3% 0 -100.0q<-----•-------------0 -100.0% 318,534 -90,8% 0 •100.0% 180,665 -85.4% 4 -100.0%
" July 1990 Aspen imposed an addi6onal .45% sales tax dedicated ior aflordaMe employee housing
" 1/1193 Glenwood 5prings sales tax rate increased 25% to 3.00%, 1/1196 Glenwood sales tax increased from 3.00% to 325%
" 1 i1 l95 Telluride sales lax rale increased .50% to 4.5%
" 1/1/96 Eagle Courty sales tax rate increased from 1.0% ta 1.5% for iransportation and bike paths " Mintum is reporting ciry and their courny poAion
NOV.'92-APRIL'931NOV.'93-APRIL'94 3.5% 62% 4.8°/0 10.5% 9.3% 7.0% 7.8% 73% 13.9%
MAY'93-OCT. '93 / PAAY '94 - OCT. '94 12.7% 8.7°b 72% 11.3% 15.3% 15.8% 19.3% 10J °l0 15.8%
NOV.53-APRIL94MOV.'94-APRIL'95 0.40/a 3.3% 2.4°l0 2.8°/0 9.7% 12.8% 52Mo •2.0°/0 -1.7%
MAY 54-OCT. '94IMAY '95-OCT. '95 0.8% -1.7% 3.6% 11.3% 5.8°10 7.8% -1.6°!a 5.1 % 192%
NOV.'94APRIL'95MOV.'95•APRIL'96 •54.9°!a -51.0% -52.3°/a •72.0% •64.7% -45.3% -65.8% -54.0% •63.4%
MAY'95-OCT.'951AflAY'96-OCT.'96 -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% •100.0°/0 -100.0°!e -100.0% -100.0% -100.0%
SALES TAX RECEIPT3
LAST UPDATE 13-Mar-96
VAIL % ASPEN % STEAMBOAT BRECKEN- % FRI5C0 % AVON % CRESTED % MTCRESTED % DILLON %
SPRINGS RIDGE BUTTE BUTTE
SELF INC. SELF INC. SELF INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC.
(a%) ••(1.7%) (4.5%) 14°la) (20/0) (4%) (4°ia) (40/6) (4%)
JANUARY 1993 1,855,364 6.5% 612,492 21.3% 1,059,472 8.1% B46,602 10.5% 145,276 15.1% 276,902 192% 96,459 •1.6% 191,647 2.3% 40,820 14.9%
FEBRUARY 1993 1,828,766 2.7% 595,485 18.8% 1,089,826 6.1% 908,305 11.1% 140,546 2.1% 252,447 10.3% 110,096 12.9% 202,607 5.8% 44,520 3.6%
MARCH 1993 1,988,090 0.5°! 689,769 15.4% 1,304,181 4.6% 1,122,593 3.8% 186,521 11.0% 310,910 14.0% 134,365 2.5% 222,566 •2.4% 59,595 9.3%
APRIL1993 864,303 25.1% 270,069 27.8% 440,315 16.6% ~ 432,777 20.5% 108,701 9.0% 185,925 13.1% 39,988 1.4% 44,224 40.3% 26,337 21,1%
MAY 1993 257,248 -4.0% 207,336 22.8% 336,298 11.0% 178,430 8.2% 86,544 11.4% 153,663 11.6% 36,152 92% 10,333 35.6°/0 14,207 12.8%
JUNE 1993 475,161 1.4% 321,768 15.4% 505,625 11.0% 271,762 0.9% 116,677 10.9% 206,420 15.4% 76,702 10,6% 20,635 -7.6% 22,603 177%
JULY 1993 811,538 9.3% 461,5B7 22.5% 631,025 13.6% 464,381 187% 140,811 21.4% 244,697 19.9% 123,293 -1.1% 55,968 14.4% 31,918 39.8%
AUGUST 1993 825,954 1.7% 468,612 9.8% 648,090 15.9% 436,894 82% 148,164 15.1% 229,405 13.7% 119,867 7.8% 50,535 2.4% 25,411 -14.9%
3EPTEMBER1993 560,535 15.3% 349,333 11.9% 621,728 13.5% 349,002 12.1% 138,613 32.0% 197,197 13.9% 97,573 8.8% 30,262 •1J% 25,852 26.0%
OCT08ER1993 400,525 9.0% 227,090 15.2% 431,901 4.3% 248J71 23.9% 109,162 20.0% 194,654 12.5% 57,715 18.8% 16,493 •6.0% 17,816 19.1°/0
NOVEMBER 1993 553,681 112% 223,382 6.2% 443,172 13.9% 339,986 29.3% 134,525 31.2% 220,648 21.3% 72,427 48.6% 76,278 29.1% 25,286 232°/0
DECEMBER1993 1,974,553 7.0% 719,183 9.6% 1.095,108 52% 884,934 10.8% 178,418 10.0% 358,976 3.3% 152,158 5.1% 229,865 4.1% 46,831 0.6%
,
12,395,718 6.8% 5,146J06 16.3% 8,612.743 9.0% 6,491,839 1,633,958 15.1% 2,831,846 13.4% 1,116,795 7.8% 1,151,613 52% 381,202
JANUARY1994 1,805,707 -23°! 640,713 4.6% 1,086,307 2.5q 916224 8.0% 138,845 -4.4% 276,391 0.5% 91,478 -52% 185,375 -3.4% 45,145 10.6%
FEBRUARV1994 1,814,495 -0.8% 635,652 6.7% 1,102,435 12°/ 931,580 26% 146,730 4,4% 263,028 42% 114,492 4.0% 220,042 8.6% 49,339 10.8%
MARCH1994 2,250,656 13.2% 738,349 7.0% 1,376,118 5.5% 1.245,513 109% 207326 112°/ 338,763 9.0% 151,663 13A% 269,698 212% 78,380 31.5%
APRIL1994 794,668 -8.1% 265,461 -1J°/ 474,482 7.8% 514225 18.8% 118,377 B.9% 204,538 10.0% 36,986 -7,5% 29,059 •34.3% 26,540 0.8°6
MAY1994 287,315 117% 211,479 2.0% 3B1,077 13.3% 223275 25.1% 96,594 11.6% 165,122 20.5% 45,029 24.6% 12,317 192% 17,541 23.5%
JUNE 1994 548,820 15.5% 337,606 4.9% 545,054 7.8% 342,336 232°/ 130,927 122% 229,785 11.3% 92,182 20.2% 22,539 92% 29,213 292%
JULY 1994 692,830 10.0% 553,656 19.9% 664,636 8.5% 509,336 97% 197,253 40.1% 273,543 11.8% 162,956 32.2% 60,434 B,0°/ 34,006 6.5%
AUGUST 1994 691,566 7.9% 512,818 9.4% 701,671 8.3% 469,792 7.5% 148,527 02% 264,961 15.5% 139,003 16.0% 52,928 4.7% 30,767 21.0%
SEPTEMBER 1994 • 725,205 29.4% 384,740 10.1% 644,138 2.6% 359,498 3.0% 160,674 15.9% 241,489 22.5% 109,288 12.0% 30,882. 2.0% 28,654 10.B%
OCTOBER1994 408,405 2.0% 213,533 .•6.0% 451,792 4.6% 270,388 9.0°la 119,138 9.1% 225,391 15.8% 61,673 6.9% 23,689 43.6% 19,432 9.1%
NOVEMBER 1994 594,491 7.4% 261,952 17.3% 448,367 12% 402,819 18.5°/a 126,087 -4.B% 247,843 12.3% 67,971 -62°!a 48,914 -35.9% 22,283 -11.9%
DECEMBER 1994 1,992,855 0.9% 736,999 2.5% 1,170,961 6.9% 959,585 8.4% 212,151 18.9% 419,187 16.8% 147,237 •32% 223,427 -2.6°/ 51,992 11.0%
13,007,013 4.9% 5,492,958 6.7% 9,067,038 5.3% 7,144,571 10.1% 1,604,629 1,0.4% 3,172,041 12.0% 1,220,160 9.3% 1,179,304 2.4% 433,292 13.7%
i.f
SALES TAX RECEIPTS
LAST UPDATE 13•Mar•96
TELLURIDE % SILVERTHORNE % SNOWMASS % EAGLE COUNTY % MINTURN % DURANGO % E3TE5 PARK % GLENWOOD % BEAVER CREEK °/o
SPRINGS RESORT CO
3TATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. SELF INC.
(4.50/6) (40/6) (1 '-(1.5%) '*(4%) (2%) (40Q *.(3.25°/a) (5°(0)
,
JANUARY 1995 307,516 40.5% 388,808 3.1% 169,332 •0.6% 739.397 7.3% 36,727 -0.0% 355,561 8.7% 151,629 -5.6% 449,497 6.5% 864,953 16.70!0
FEBRUARY 1995 332,898 202% 410,914 4.9% 188,814 1.7% 754,585 7.40/ 33,152 •3.4% 346287 13.6% 203,979 142% 447,396 8.3% 619,779 9.1%
MARCH 1995 393,255 15.0% 516,237 -9J0/6 211,813 •5.9% ` 903,019 4.2% 47,909 4.70% 458,729 11.1°1 226,199 3,5% 574,274 7.9% 1,036,608 -1.7%
APRIL1995 122,357 •9.1% 366,618 11.3'/0 45,740 •2.2% ~ 428,485 ' 1.3% 25,866 13.3% 368,238 6.5% 212,103 62% 481,023 2.1% 263,469 5.8%
MAY 1995 109,460 19.9% 307,624 5.2% 12,911 58.9% 262,408 17.2% 16,698 -2.8% 426,317 5.8% 297,163 •1.9% 518,587 1.9% 66,598 56.2%
JUNE 1995 218,669 13.3% 391,786 •1.8% 31,079 -10.0% 385,764 10.3% 25,6115 12.0% 598,692 5.6% 542,292 1.3% 663,380 7.3% 160,214 10.8%
JULY1995 217,907 14.6% 505228 4.2% 51,223 -12.5% 505,440 12.6°b 34,195 16.6% 589,775 4.7% 691,855 9,8% 608,242 2.3% 281,091 8.1%
AUGUST1995 265,697 21.9% 505,884 7.40!6 57,610 4,0% 499,859 t.d°lo 34,111 17.9% 565,625 2.6% 636,336 1.1% 626,663 2.9% 297,871 -02%
SEPTEMBER 1995 198,429 •2.2% 456,616 12.7% 35,827 30.0% 454A24 1.7% 48,194 71.3% 622,141 6.9% 624,841 -9.7% 670,325 62% 169,007 -0.7%
OCTOBER 1995 128,739 16.8% 345,363 -1.0% 13,971 -31.1% 340,000 10.0% 24,113 18.1% 455,522 5.4% 329,121 11,8% 566,246 2.0% 91,768 23.0%
NOVEMBER 1995 117,763 6.8% 348,913 5.9°/a 16,732 -29.1% 382,408 12.5°I> 18,259 16.4°/ 381,589 5.9% 209,606 02% 528,293 0.3% 161,409 33.6%
DECEMBER 1995 299,159 4.4% 593,223 3.3% 126,458 •7.3% 924,104 10.8% 38,864 -6.0% 604219 3.6°1 283,316 2.9°!0 743,488 5.0% 898,903 5.4%
2,7i1,849 142% 5,137214 3.3% 961,510 -3.1% 6,579,493 7.4% 393,703 11.8°!0 5,772,915 6.3% 4,408,460 2.0% 6,877,416 4.3% 5,129,870 7.40
JANUARY 1996 -100.0% -100.0% -100.0°! -100.0% -140.6% 382,790 77% •100.0% •100.0% 852,366 •1.0%
FEBRUARY 1996 -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0°1> -100.0%
PNARCH 1996 -100.0°/0 -100.0% -100,0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0%
APRIL1996 -100.0% -100.0°/a -100.0% -100.0% -106.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% -100.0%
MAY 1996 -100.0% -100.0% -100,0% •100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0°! -100.00/6
JUNE 1996 -100.0% •100.0°l0 •100.0% •100.0% •100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0%
JULY 1996 -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% •100.0°!0 •100.0% -100.0% -100.0%
AUGUST 1996 -100.0% -100.0°1e -100,0% , -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •104.0%
SEPTEMBER 1996 •100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% -100.04
OCTOBER 1996 -100.0% -100.0°1a -100.0% •100.001i -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% -100.0%
NOVENkBER 1996 -140.0% -100.0% -100,09'a -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% -109.00/.
DECEMBER 1996 -109.6% -100.0% -100.0/o ~ -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% •100.0% -100.0%
0-100.0% 0-100.0% 0-100.0% 0-100.0% 0•100.0% 382,790 -93.4% 0-100.0% 0 -100.0% 852,366 •83.4%
" July 1990 Aspen imposed an addiflonal .45% sales tax dedicated ior aflordable employee housing
" 1/1193 Glernrvood Springs sales tax rate increased .25% to 3.00%
" 111/95 Teliuride sales tax rate increased .50% to 4.5 %
" 1!1l96 Eagle Courny sales tax rate increased from 1.40% to 1,5%for iranspoAation and bike paths ,
" MiMum is repoding ciry and their county portion.
NOV.'92•APRIL'93lNOV.'93•APRlL'94 12,8°10 13.4% 6.1°fa 10.tqo 3.6% 16.0% 13.8% 16.3% 9.4%
MAY'93-OCT. '93 ! MAY'94 - OCT. '94 12.4% 14.3% 3.0% 16.0% 5.3% 10.0°fo 11.0% 9.1 °l0 14.5%
N4V.'93-APRIL'94/NOV.'94-APRIL55 12.9% 5.5% -1.5% 6.5% 2.59'0 82% 6.0% 6.5% 7.3%
PAAY 54-OCT. '94/MAY'95-OC7. '95 13.3% 4.6% -0.9% 7.8% ' 24.6% 52°la 12% 3.9% 7.6%
NOV. '94-APRIL'95/NOV. '95-APRIL'96 -73.1°!0 •63.6% -81.5% -67.3% -71.5°b •44.6% -61.4% -60.1% •51.7%
MAY55-OCT.'951MAY'96-OCT.'96 -100.0% •100.0% -100.0% •100.0% . •140.0% -100.U°lo -100.0°/0 •100.0% -100.0%
ci
SALES TAX RECEIPTS "
LAST UPDATE 13-Mar-96 TELLURIDE % SILVERTHORNE % SNOWMASS % EAGLE COUNTY % MINTURN % DURANGO % ESTES PARK % GLENWOOD % BEAVER CREEK %
SPRINGS RESORT CO
STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. STATE INC. SELF INC. SELF INC.
~(4.5°l0) (4°l0) (1%) •'(1.5%) "(4%) (2%) 149/6) "(3.25%) (5%
)
'
JANUARY1993 220,046 11.6% 327,587 5.0% 155,432 2.1% 659,952 10.2% 33,564 10.3% 292J59 9.8% 145,635 3.1% 376,139 19.4% 696,612 16.5~a
FEBRUARY 1993 233,116 19.1°1e 342,417 2.6% 184,882 15.0°/0 656,584 57°/ 34,853 17.9% 269,822 2.0% 143,084 -2.1% 364,769 16.8% 755,667 15.8Yo
MARCH 1993 315,936 15.3% 447,696 2.1% 196,734 8.6% ` 765,359 5.9% 41,125 -3.6% 358,813 •02% 195,477 82% 459,989 23.5% 917,750 9.6%
APRI11993 , 94,692 26.1% 290,308 7.3°6 52,604 13.0% I 349,410 16.3% 25,310 27.0% 302,338 5.9% 169,924 -0J% 432,802 22.4% 269,744 67.9%
MAY1993 71,968 •4.2% 252,453 -02% 11,477 -0.9% 190,942 -23.9% 13,721 2.4% 369,631 6.0% 270,722 4.6°!a 469,413 18.5% 45,297 6.9%
JUNE1993 187,364 -1.0°1 334,102 -2.2% 31,877 -5.6% 327,390 22.6°!a 23,508 28J°/ 489,800 7.8% 489,638 42% 538,492 227% 144,123 6.3%
JULY 1993 168,467 9.0% 383,604 •6.3% 42,926 -5.4% 398,041 18.3% 22,955 -10.9% 522,548 7.6% 592,147 47% 564,235 25.0% 216,493 -0.5%
AUGUST 1993 190,234 5.6% 450,524 -4.2% 72,149 37.7% 436,683 22.5% 29,060 6.9% 511,911 9.5% 575,406 -2.6°la 552,300 17.8% 240,676 0.0%
SEPTEMBER 1993 185,132 -32% 359,806 -0.4% 26,322 -6.5% 365,864 15.6% 29,691 17.5% 523,957 92% 576,538 8.6% 572,918 212% 160,840 1.9%
OC70BER 1993 91,301 62% 320,170 27.1% 11,623 4.1% 238,999 6.5% 20,542 26.7% 397,193 10.4% 273,750 13.7% 525,916 232% 74,951 37.3%
NOVEMBER1993 121,178 25.2% 300,446 6.1% 20,417 1.6% 301,865 14.5°/0 , 18,692 5.3% 342,738 212% 234,002 40J% 495,198 24.0% 116,272 47J%
DECEMBER 1993 282,369 8.9% 480,557 2.3% 139,242 6.9% 772,160 11.1% 37,245 4.9% 551,537 19.0% 218,508 -8J% 660,328 21.9% 776,715 19.3%
2,161,805 9.5% 4,289,830 2.0% 949.665 82% 5,483,249 330,866 4,932,507 3,884,831 4.9% 6,012,499 21.5°!o 4,415,200 15.4%
JANUAHY 1994 218,816 -0.6% 371,276 152% 170,413 9.6% 689,137 4.4% 36,744 9.5% 327,036 11.9% 160,651 10.3% 421,973 122% 737,823 5.9%
FEBRUARY 1994 216,650 16.8% 391,786 14.4% 185,587 0.4% 702,441 7.0% 34,322 -1.5% 304,884 13.0% 178,663 24.9% 413,043 132% 751,060 -0.6%
MARCH 1994 341,941 82% 571,893 27.1% 225,075 13.3% 866,967 10.40f6 45,742 9.6% 412,973 151°/ 218,480 11.8% 532,058 15.7% 1,057,056 152%
APRIL 1994 134,558 42.1% 329,330 13.4% 46,790 -11.1% 423,028 21.1% 22,830 -9.8% 345,826 14.4% 196,104 15.4% 471,253 8.9% 249,086 •77%
MAY 1994 91,277 26.8% 292,293 15.8% 8,127 -292% 223,901 17.3% 17,185 252% 402,803 9.0% 302,968 11.9% 508,626 8.4% 42,108 -7.0%
JUNE 1994 193,009 3.0% 398,928 19.4% 34,530 8.3% 349,617 6.8% 22,879 -2.7% 566,796 157% 535,491 9.4% 618,320 14.8% 144,810 0.5%
JULV 1994 190,169 12.9% 484,942 26.4% 58,525 36.3% 448,749 12.7% 29,281 27.6% 563,123 7.8% 629,833 6.40% 594,767 5.4% 259,942 20.1%
AUGUST 1994 217,890 14.5°/0 471,138 4.6% 55,371 -23.3% 492,869 12.9% 28,929 -0.5% 551,364 7.7% 629,507 9.4% 609,258 10.3% 298,394 24.0%
SEPTEMBER 1994 202,844 9.6% 445,330 12.7% 27,566 -2.7% 446,549 22.1% 28,139 •52% 581,765 11.0% 691,588 20.0% 631,225 102% 190,259 18.3%
OCTOBER 1994 110225 20.7% 348,625 8.9% 20,266 74.4% 309,112 29.3% 20,413 -0.6% 431,993 8.8% 294,452 7.6% 555,376 5.6% 74,614 •0.4%
NOVEMBER 1994 110,240 -9.0% 329,503 9.1°/ 23,597 15.6% 339,848 12.6% 15,423 -17.5% 360,405 52% 209,198 -10.6% 526,937 6.4°1 120,768 3.9%
DECEMBEfl 1994 286,463 14% 574,102 19.5% 136,358 -2.1% 833,946 8.0% 41,324 11.0% 582,991 5.7% 275,294 26.0% 707,863 • 72% 852,677 9.8%
2,374,282 9.8% 4,915,346 16.0% 992,205 4.5% 6,126,164 11.7% 343,211 3.7% 5,431,959 10.1% 4,322,229 11,3% 6,590, - 899. 9.6% 4, • 778 • ,619 - 82%
ee
e4
411
TO1~V~1 OF ~AIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Attorney
Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2107/Fax 970-479-2157
March 15, 1996
HAND DELIVERED
Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr., Esquire
Dunn, Abplanalp & Christensen, P.C.
108 S. Frontage Road, Suite 300
Vail, CO 81657
. Re: International Wing - Lodge at Vail
Dear Art:
We are in receipt by fax, regular mail and Federal Express your client's objection to the staff
decision of March 7, 1996 on the above-referenced project.
Pursuant to Section 18.54.080 of the Vail Municipal Code, this appeal is scheduled on the Design
` Review Board agenda on April 3, 1996.
Very truly yours,
~
R. Thomas Moorhead
Town Attorney
RTM/aw -
xc: Vail Town Council
Planning & Environmentai Commission
Andy Knudtsen
Jay Peterson, Esq.
RECYCLEU PAPER
~
/d
e4
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of tlze Towii Manager
Vail, Colorado 81657
470-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 .
Marcli 11, 1996
Mr. Piet Peters
Director
Vail Recreation District
292 W. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Re: World Wide Church of God
Dear Piet:
The purpose of this letter is to confirm our understanding regarding our recent discussions regarding
the World Wide Church of God. As we discussed several weeks ago, the Town of Vail is willing
allocate 13 of its free use days specified in our agreement with the VRD for use by the Vdorld Wide
Church of God. It is our'understanding that the Church of God will utilize 10 of these days for its
activities in Vail. The remaining three days are to offset the cost of providing this service for the
` Church of God.
If this agreement is acceptable, please endorse below and return the original to me for our records.
The Town would have 17 days remaining for its use this year. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
TOWN OF VAIL- ACCEPTED BY:
Robert W. McLaurin
Town Manager Piet Peters, Director
RWMJaw Vail Recreation District
xc: Vail Town Council
R. Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney
Frank Johnson, WT&CB
RECYCLEDPAPER
C)flic:c ol thc- liuard c11, Ci,1iimicsiunr.i-: li;iglc (;cWilly Building
(970) 318-$60i P.O. Hox SSi)
e•
1'az; (970) 32N-7207 • 50(1 BtYndwaV
T[)D: (5170) 328-H'!97 , 1:ag)i•, Cn1t?r;tdci 8(631-085(}
MaPCh 15, 1996 9 5:'4 6 . .
~GLE COllNTY, C~~~~~~~
A'W"O" EIMD A
no%
gauAR'u ""F C'UUNTY COMMISSf~NERS
~ REGUL'"0R MEET6NG DAY
, ARCH 18,1996
~ a p o o i1 u sr A o a it a a d a c it a o a a v ff b c es d a a tr a a C a a a a a
I
~~~~~~T CALENDAR
Pmme, oq a rouGnearod nnmeonbavorsiml niatum ere plawd on the oonssnt cebnaer to altour the Oftrd of Couniy Comiea"orrem9a apsnd
de tiw mnd energy on nmre Impodanl (tema on n Iangthq ee6nde. Any cammbaioner nmy r.quset thal an asrn be 'REMOVED' trom
tPsa cnnoent eatendar ond cowddorod nbpiarstety. F9nq mendmr uf the pub0a may °REQUESl' imny ilem be "REAAAOVEL7` Pmffiffi8Canasnt
Agenda.
~
` ADDo
,
C. 4RANSPOR7'ATIQN SER1/ICES AGREEIUIEIdT
BETWEEN E4G1.E COUIVTYa STA7E OF COLOitADO
AND THE TOWfd QF AVON
Rabe?t Loeifler, Attorney's O€fic.e
ACTsON: ConsideP approva!
7p9E NIEXT 04EE71RU3 OIF 7HE EAcaLE COUNTY CCUN11551oNER5 fnALL BE HELD Otd AIARCH 19, 19e6
ALI. RAEEi'lP1" VNLL BE H@LO 16dTHE EAAGI.E COUtdN 011q.OINO - 300 BRqwDWAY, EAGLE• OR OTHERYNSE Pl07ED,
TkdS AGENDA 1$ PRObIDED FOR INFORMWT10P111l. PURPOSES ONLV - ALL'YIMEs AAE APPROJtIMAYE_
3NE BOARO NUFiIt$ lid 5E9510W RAAV CC1N31DER OThER ITEM6 THAT ARE BRWOHT BEFOdE IY.
I