HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-10-01 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1996
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
2. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of September 3 and 17, 1996.
3. West Vail Interchange.
4. A. An appeal by an adjacent property owner of a Planning and Environmental
Commission decision granting an approval of a request for a front setback
variance, to allow for the construction of four, triplex buildings, located at 1894
Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3 (Vail Point Phase III).
Appellant: Phyllis Mango
B. Review of the proposed Development Plan for Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3
as required by the Annexation Agreement of 1979, annexing Lot 27 into the Town
of Vail. Applicant: Steve Gensler and Stephen Katz.
5. Town Manager's Report.
6. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
• (ALL T1MES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
I I I I I I I
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/8/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10115/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/15196, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
I I I I I I I
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or
479-2356 TDD for information.
C:WGENDA.TC
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1996
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
7:35 P.M. 2. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of September 3 and 17,
1996.
7:40 P.M. 3. West Vail Interchange.
, Larry Grafel
Greg Hall ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve recommendation to design
Dick Bauman and construct the roundabout at the West Vail Interchange.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Extensive public process, staff analysis and
recommendation to design and construct the West Vail Interchange. VviII
include preliminary cost estimates, construction schedule option and
preliminary plan, and financing options.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve proceeding with design and
development of construction documents on the two lane, double roundabout
at the West Vail Interchange.
8:40 P.M. 4. A. An appeal by an adjacent property owner of a Planning and
George Ruther Environmental Commission decision granting an approval of a request for
a front setback variance, to allow for the construction of four, triplex
buildings, located at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing
#3 (Vail Point Phase III). Appeltant: Phyllis Mango.
B. Review of the proposed Development Plan for Lot 27, Block 2,
Lionsridge Filing #3 as required by the Annexation Agreement of 1979,
annexing Lot 27 into the Town of Vail. Applicant: Steve Gensler and
Stephen Katz.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
A. Uphold, uphold with modifications or overturn the Planning and
Environmental Commission's decision of August 26, 1996, granting an
approval of a front setback variance at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block
2, Lionsridge Filing #3.
B. Approve, approve with modifications or deny the proposed
development plan for Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Please see the attached memorandum from
the Community Development Department staff, to the Vail Town Council,
dated October 1, 1996 and the memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission dated August 26, 1996.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
A. Uphold the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision of
August 26, 1996, granting a 12' front setback variance.
B. Approve the development plan for Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3
as proposed.
9:00 P.M. 5. Town Manager's Report.
9:05 P.M. 6. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
tiAtt MMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUB.tECT TO CHANGE)
I I I I I I I
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1018/96, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWiNG VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION '
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,10/15196, BEGINNiNG AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENtNG MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/15/96, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or
479-2356 TDD for information.
C:WGENDA.TCE
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Qevelopment Department
DATE: October 1, 1996
SUBJECT: An appeal of a Planning and Environmental Commission decision granting an
approval of a request for a front setback variance to allow for the construction of
four triplex buildings, located at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge
Filing #3 (Vail Point Phase III).
Appellant: Phyllis Mango, adjacent property owner
Appellee: Steven Gensler and Stephen Katz
Planner: George Ruther
1. SUBJECT PROPERTY
Vail Point Phase III, located at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3.
11. STANDING OF APPELLANT
Pursuant to subsection 18.66.030 (13)(2) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, an appeal may be
initiated by
"an appl+cant, adjacent property owner, or any aggrieved or adversely affected person
from any order, decision, determination, or interpretation by any administrative official with
respect to this title."
Staff finds that the appellant, Phyllis Mango, an adjacent property owner to Lot 27, Block 2,
Lionsridge 3rd Fi(ing, has standing to file an appeal of the Planning and Environmental
Commission's decision of August 26, 1996, granting an approval of a front setback variance.
III. BACKGROUND
On August 26, 1996, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission, upon
conducting a public hearing, granted an approval of a request for a front setback variance to
allow for the construction of four triplex buildings, located at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block
2, Lionsridge Filing #3. The Planning and Environmental Commission's decision to grant
approval of the requested variance was based upon the findings that:
• the granting of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege, inconsistent
with the limitations on other properties classified in the Medium-Density Multi-Family Zone
District.
• that the granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or
welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
1
• The variance to encroach into the front setback was warranted since the strict and literal
enforcement of the 20' front setback regulation would result in an unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the goals and objectives of Chapter 18 of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code.
Upon making the findings, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted unanimously to
approve, with modifications, the applicanYs request for a front setback variance. The Planning
and Environmental Commission's approval carried with it the following conditions:
1. That the applicant scheduie a hearing before the Vai1 Town Council for review of the
proposed site plan, prior to appearing before the Town of Vail Design Review Board, as
required in the Annexation Agreement of July 17, 1979;
2. That the applicant verify the vacation of the 15' wide, utility easement along the northerly
property line prior to appearing before the Town of Vail Design Review Board;
3. That the applicant receive Town of Vail Public Works Department and Town of Vail Fire
Department approval of the proposed site plan prior to appearing before the Town of Vail
Design Review Board;
4. That the applicant install a construction fence, along the 40% slope line and the area
around the existing landscape improvements, to protect these areas during the
construction process, and that said fence not be removed until all driveway and building
construction is completed; and
5. That any encroachment of Building #1 into the front setback be removed and the site plan
be amended accordingly.
A copy of the memorandum prepared by staff to the Planning and Environmental Commission,
dated August 26, 1996, and a copy of the approved minutes from the August 26, 1996 Planning
and Environmental Commission meeting have been attached for reference.
IV. NATURE OF THE APPEAL
On September 4, 1996, the Town of Vail Community Development Department received an
appeal letter from Jennifer Henise and Phyllis Mango, requesting that the Planning and
Environmental Commission decision granting an approval of a front setback variance to allow for
the construction of four triplex buildings, located at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2,
Lionsridge Filing #3 be appealed to the Town Council. The appeal has been filed pursuant to
Chapter 18.66 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Ms. Henise and Ms. Mango filed the appeal
as adjacent property owners.
On September 5, 1996, the Community Development Department received a letter from Jennifer
Henise requesting that her name be withdrawn from the appeal of the Planning and
Environmental Commission's action.
According to a written explanation of the reasons for the appeal, the appellant argued that the
Planning and Environmental Commission's decision granting an approval of the front setback
variance is inconsistent with Section 18.18.010, (Medium-Density Multi Family, purpose), of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code. According to Section 18.18.010, the purpose of the Medium-
2
Density Multi Family Zone District is, in part, to insure adequate light, air and space and to
maintain desirable residentiaf qualities of the district. According to the appellanYs letter, she
feels that adequate light, air, and space is denied, since the proposed triplex structures are too
close to one another and the triplexes are too close to the neighboring Capstone Townhouse
property, where she owns a unit and resides.
The appellant further believes that the triplexes wifl be "touching" mature 20-year old Blue Spruce
trees and some selected trees will be moved in order to build the triplexes. Additionally,
according to the appellant, the proposed development for the four triplex structures completely
take up all the buildable land of Lot 27 and provides no open space between the buildings and
adjacent properties. The appellant further contends that the three-story buildings will be
"towering" over Capstone, which is 10'-20' lower in elevation than the appellee's property. Lastly,
the appellant has expressed concern, and has requested that consideration be given to snow
removal on Lot 27.
A copy of the appellanYs appeal request and a letter describing the nature of her request has
been attached for reference.
V. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL
Uphold/ uphold with modifications/ overturn the Planning and Environmental Commission's
decis+on granting an approval of a front setback variance.
The Town Council is required to make findings of fact on this appeal in accordance with Section
18.66.030 (D)(5), Findings:
" The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on
the particular evidence presented to it. The findings of fact must support conclusions that
the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title have or have not
been met."
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Vail Town Council uphold the Planning and Environmental
Commission's decision of August 26, 1996, granting an approval of a 12' front setback variance.
- Staff recommends that the Town Council make the following findings:
1. That the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on
the requested front setback variance in accordance with Chapter 18.66 Administration
and Chapter 18.62 Variances, and has made the appropriate findings pursuant to Section
18.62.060 Criteria and Findings of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
2. That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 18 (Zoning) of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code have been met.
3. That the proposed development plan for Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3, has been
approved by the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission and is in
compliance with Section 18.18.010 Purpose, Medium Density Multi-Family Zone District
of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
3
~''7~~
E;
~ ~ ? ._,c .
TY)WN OF YAIL
~ N ~,PPE,A~ ~ORM
TOt~-~U ~
REQUIRED FOR. F1LIh1G AN APPEAL OF A STAFF, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OR
PY.A1oiNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION
A. ACTION/DECISION BEING APPEALED:
4 ti cC "KUh'f 4 H CfS '7~ G ~ l o W ~ 7/vZ
?
U '
Lo t Z~ , 3/0~,~ Z, L i o..s r, ol ;j'L hci
-A rccn~ : Sk&-en caehs(tr GhG~ ~-~2 Lti
~ /4 a .L Pr • C~ ~NS-G lzJ~~
B. DATE OF ACTION/DECISION:_ Av~~2j+ 1-iq(.
C. NAME OF BOARD OR PERSON RENDERING THE DECISION/TAKING ACTION:
D. NAME OF APPELLANT(S):
MAiLINC ADDxEss: _ ~ rv1 e~d o -2; d 4- Vc~ I C.~ ~-7
, PHYSICAL ADDRESS W VAIL: PHONE: 03 Cos
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF APPELLANT'S PROPERTY IN VAII,:
E. SIGNATURE(S):
Page 1 of 2
F. Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of land? If yes, please provide the following infonnation:
are you an adjacent property owner? Yes -X- no
If no, give a detailed explanation of how you are an "aggrieved or adversely affected person." "Aggrieved or
adversely affected person" means any person who will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or
furthered by tlus title. The alleged adverse interest may be shared in common with othcr members of the
community at lazge, but shall exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons.
G. Provide the names and addresses (both person's mailing address and propecty's physical address in Vail) of all
owners of property which are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including properties
separated by a right-of-way, stream, or other intervening barriers). Also provide addressed and stamped envelopes for
each property owner on the list.
H. On separate sheets of paper, specify the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code secdons having
relevance to the action being appealed.
1. FEE: $0.60
,
Page 2 of 2
We are appealing because Code Section 18.18.010 , Purpose,
states that there must be intention 1) to ensure adequate light,
air and space, and 2) to maintain desirable residential qualities
of the district.
We feel that adequate light, air, and space is denied by 1)
the triplexes are too close to themselves and 2) the triplexes are
too close to the neighboring Capstone Townhouse Property, and 3)
the triplexes will be touching mature 20 year old blue spruce trees
and some selected trees will be moved in order to build the
triplexes. The plan of four triplexes has completely taken up all
buildable land allowing for no open space between buildings and
inadequate space between neighbors. Three story buildings, 30 feet
away, will be towering over Capstone which is 10 ta 20 feet lower.
Neighboring residences are surrounded by a great amount of open
space.
Another cansideration is that drainage and snow removal will
adversely affect the Capstone property.
Jennif er Henise
1817 Meadow Ridge Road
Vail, CO 81657
Phone (970) 479-0426 Fax (970) 476-4704
~
September 5, 1996 ~
ft P{~ r~ .
George Ruther
Planning and Environmental ~~~j
Town of Vail ~ U4:
Vail, CO
Dear George,
I withdraw my appeal submitted yesterday concerning the
Ginsler development of Lions Ridge Loop adjacent to our property.
Please notify all to whom it may concern. Thank you.
Sincerely,
J
q4
Jennifer Henise
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: August 26, 1996
SUBJECT: A request for height and front setback variances to allow for the construction of
four triplex buildings, located at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge
Filing #3 (Vail Point Phase III).
Applicant: Steven Gensler and Stephen Katz
Planner: George Ruther
4
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. General Descri tp ion
Steve Gensler and Steve Katz are proposing to construct four, triplex units on
Phase III at Vail Point. Phase III is zoned medium density multi-family. The four,
triplex structures will be served by a common driveway, 22' wide, with an
emergency vehicle turnaround at the south end of the driveway. There will be a
total of 12 dwelling units comprised of 21,614 sq. ft. of GRFA. The units will
range in size from 1,783 sq. ft. to 1,804 sq. ft. Staff will discuss specific
components of the development under the analysis in Section IV of this
memorandum.
The applicants are proposing to construct two of the four structures in the
required, 20' front setback. One of the structures encroaches up to 12' into the
front setback, while the other encroaches up to 9' into the setback. A total of 286
sq. ft. of building footprint area will be in the front setback. According to Section
18.18.060 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the minimum front setback for
structures built in the Medium Density Multi-Family Zone District shall be 20'.
Therefore, the applicants are requesting a variance from Section 18.18.060,
to allow for the construction of two structures to encroach into the 20'
required front setback, up to 12' and 9' respectively. The applicants have
stated that the location of Lionsridge Loop in proximity to the northerly property
line warrants the granting of the requested variance. A letter from the applicants
addressing their position on the variance has been attached for reference.
The applicants had originally requested a building height variance to allow one of
the four, triplex structures to exceed the allowable building height of 38'. The
applicants have since withdrawn their building height variance request.
Therefore, staff will not be addressing the building height issue in this
memorandum.
1
B. Process
When Vail Point was annexed into the Town of Vail, the Annexation Agreement
dated July 17, 1979, (Book 428, Page 936) stipulated that there would have to be
a review of each proposed site plan by the Planning and Environmental
Commission (PEC), the Vail Town Council and the Design Review Board (DRB)
for each phase of the Vail Point project. Though the process is similar to a
Special Development District (SDD), the proposal is not an SDD. Furthermore,
the annexation ordinance did not specify review criteria. However, applicable
criteria for this project include the standards for the Medium Density Multi-Family
Zone District, general goals addressed in the Town of Vail's long-range planning
documents and the Design Review Board Guidelines (Chapter 18.54) of the Town
of Vail Municipal Code.
The annexation agreement permits 15 dwelling units and 19,462 sq. ft. of Gross
Residential Floor Area (GRFA), plus credits of 225 sq. ft. per dwelling unit for Lot
27. Under the proposed design, there are 2,700 sq. ft. of credits as there are 12
dweiling units. By adding the credits to what is allowed, ihe total allowable square
footage for Lot 27 is 22,162 sq. ft. of GRFA.
II. BACKGROUND OF THE VAIL POINT PROJECT
The Vail Point Townhome development (formerly Talon Townhomes), Phases I, II and III, was
annexed into the Town of Vail on July 17, 1979. Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1979, addresses
the annexation. Upon annexation into the Town of Vail, Lot 27 (Phase III) was designated
Medium Density Multi-Family zoning with the conditions outlined in the annexation agreement.
The review process was defined at the time the project was annexed into the Town of Vail, as
described in Section I of this memorandum.
The Vail Point Townhome development is comprised of three phases. Phases I and II are
located on Lot 1, Block 3, which is on the north side of Lionsridge Loop, and Phase I II is located
on Lot 27, Block 2, which is across the street, on the south side of Lionsridge Loop. According to
the annexation agreement, Phases I and II were approved for 48 dwelling units, while Phase III
was approved for a maximum of 15 dwelling units.
- The list below summarizes the history of the Vail Point Townhome Project:
Phase I Phase I, as constructed, includes 20 dwelling units having a total GRFA of 27,759
sq. ft. It is completed and final certificates of occupancy have been issued.
Phase II As originally approved, Phase II called for the construction af 20 dwelling units
having a total allowable GRFA of 28,045 sq. ft. In September of 1989, the
Planning and Environmental Commission approved a modification to the plan to
decrease the number of dwelling units by one and increase the total GRFA
allowed by 750 sq. ft. This approval resulted in the overall total allowable GRFA
for Phase II to be 28,795 sq. ft. The 750-sq. ft. of additional GRFA granted by the
Planning and Environmental Commission to Phase II was required to be deducted
from the total allowable GRFA for Phase III.
2
On June 8, 1992, Steve Gensler proposed a modification to the approved plans
for Phase II. This plan was approved by the Planning and Environmental
Commission and was subsequently constructed. It included a total of 28,682 sq.
ft. of GRFA in 18 dwelling units. The difference in GRFA (113 sq. ft.) was to be
transferred back to Phase III. A large portion of this was used at a later time by a
96 sq. ft. interior expansion to the Katz residence in Phase il. The 96 sq. ft.
expansion left only 17 sq. ft. of GRFA to be transferred back to Phase 111.
Construction in Phase II is not complete.
Phase III Originally, there was 19,445 sq. ft. of allowable GRFA (plus credits) allocated for
Lot 27 (Phase III). The total allowable GRFA has been increased by 17 sq. ft. to
19,462 sq. ft. plus allowable credits. There is a credit of 225 sq. ft. per dwelling
unit for units constructed in this zone district.
On June 13, 1994, Steve Gensler appeared before the Planning and
Environmental Commission with a request for a worksession to discuss the
construction of four, duplex units on Phase III. At that time, the applicant was
proposing to reduce the total density on the property from the allowed 15 dwelling
units to 8 dwelling units. The Planning and Environmental Commission discussed
at length the site plan for Lot 27. Of most importance, was the preservation of the
existing landscape improvements, constructed by the owners of the Cappstone
Townhomes, along the southerly property line of Lot 27. Additionally, the Planning
and Environmental Commission was interested in seeing the developer keep a
minimum of 15' of separation between each structure constructed on the properry.
The Planning and Environmental Commission did discuss the possibility of
granting a front setback variance to allow several of the structures to encroach
into the front setback, in order to preserve the existing landscaping along the
southerly property line. It is important to note that the discussion was preliminary,
and a more specific application would need to be submitted for review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission. The Planning and Environmental
Commission was specifically concerned that the applicant needed to exhibit the
existence of a physical hardship, allowing the granting of a variance at the time of
final review.
On June 13, 1994, a motion was made to table the discussion to the July 27,
. 1994 Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. On Septernber 12, 1994,
the applicant requested that the item be tabled indefinitely, to allow the applicant _
time to address the numerous issues identified by the Planning and Environmental
Commission.
On August 12, 1996, Steve Gensler appeared before the Planning and
Environmental Commission with a request for a front setback variance, to allow
for the construction of two of the four structures to be built in the required, 20'
front setback. One of the structures was proposed to encroach up to 19' into the
front setback, while the other structure was proposed to encroach up to 17' into
the front setback. A total of 832 sq. ft. of building footprint area was proposed to
be bui{t in the front setback.
After a lengthy discussion on the proposed front setback variance request, which
included public testimony from adjoining property owners, the Planning and
3
Environmental Commission voted unanimousiy to table the applicanYs request to
a subsequent meeting, to allow the applicant time to redesign the site plan. The
Planning and Environmental Commission members agreed that a hardship
existed on the property, thus permitting the applicant to encroach into the front
setback, however, the Planning and Environmental Commission members did not
feel that the hardship warranted a 19' and 17' encroachment into the front
setback. The Planning and Environmental Commission requested that the
applicant reduce the amount of encroachment into the front setback. A copy of
the draft August 12, 1996 Planning and Environmental Commission minutes
addressing the applicanYs request have been attached for reference.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
Legal Description: Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 3/1894 Lionsridge Loop (Phase III).
Zoning: Medium Density Mufti-Family (MDMF).
Lot Size: 2.103 acres (per Eagle Valley Surveying) or 91,637.2 sq. ft.
Allowable GRFA
per Talon Townhome
records: 19,462 sq. ft. of GRFA + a credit of 225 sq. ft. per constructed dwelling unit or 22,162 sq. ft.
Development
Standard Allowable Proposed
Height: 38' 375
Density 15 D.U. 12 D.U.
GRFA: 22,162 sq. ft. 21,614 sq. ft.
Setbacks:
Front: 20'
Side/Side 20' 23'
Rear: 20' 24'
Site Coverage: 45% or 41,236.7 sq. ft. 150/. or 13,716 sq. ft.
- Retaining wall heights: 3'-6' 6'
Parking: 2 per dwelling unit 2 enclosed spaces per dwelling unit
IV. CRtTER1A AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Section 18.62.060, Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the
Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback variance.
The recommendation for approval is based on the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
i. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
4
Phase III of the Vail Point Townhomes is approved, per the Annexation
Agreement of 1979, for 15 dwelling units and 22,162 square feet of GRFA.
The proposed density of Lot 27 (Phase III) is compatible with the density of
the other multi-family projects in the vicinity (Vail Point Townhomes
Phases I& II and the Capstone Condominiums) The applicant has
proposed to construct 12 dwelling units comprising approximately 21,614
square feet of GRFA. The applicant has proposed to construct the four,
triplex buildings as far to the north as possible to maintain an adequate
separation between the Capstone Condominiums to the south, and to
preserve the existing landscaping and landscape improvements
encroaching on to Lot 27. This has been proposed as a result of
worksession meetings with the PEC in June of 1994. !n order to maintain
the existing landscaping and provide an adequate separation between the
proposed structures and the existing condominiurns to the south, the
applicant has proposed to encroach up to 12' into the 20' front setback.
Staff believes the requested variance is reasonable, as the applicanYs lot
is severely impacted by steep slopes and encroachments onto the
property. Approximately 1.265 acres (60%) of the total 2.1037 acre lot has
slopes greater than 40%, or is within required setback areas. Staff further
believes the requested variances will have minimal, if any negative
impacts on the existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
Lionsridge Loop is constructed within a 70' wide right-of-way. The actual
width of pavement is 22' to 24' . The road, as constructed, is all the way
to the north side of the right-of-way, and therefore, approximateiy 50' of
right-of-way is located between the edge of existing asphait and the
applicanYs north property line. Staff believes that the 50' of vacant right-
of-way will act as a sufficient buffer between Vail Point Phases I and
II, Lionsridge Loop and the proposed structures.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
Staff believes the applicant has requested the minimum amount of retief
necessary from Section 18.18.060 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code to
attain the objectives of this title without resulting in a grant of special
privilege. Setbacks are intended to provide, in part, minimum separation
belween structures and uses, and to insure adequate light, air, and open
spaces and maintain desirable residential qualities. Staff believes the
requested variance to encroach into the front setback up to 12' is in
concert with the intended purposes of setbacks. Staff further believes that
there are extraordinary conditions and circumstances (steep slopes,
existing landscape encroachments, proximity of Lionsridge Loop) that
apply to the applicant's site warranting a granting of a setback variance.
5
Staff has had conversations with the applicant regarding the siight shifting
of structures to reduce the encroachment into the required setback area.
Staff would suggest that the PEC discuss with the applicant the ability to
reduce the amount of setback encroachment through slight site plan
modifications.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The staff believes the requested varianoe to encroach into ihe front
setback wi(( have positive impacts on existing development in the area.
Siaff believes the variance will allow for greater separation between the
proposed structures and the Capstone Condominiums, without negatively
impacting Phases II of the Vail Point Townhomes to the north.
B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall m ke the following findings
before grantina a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
priviiege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the applicanYs
request for a variance from Section 18.18.060 to allow the construction of finro structures
to encroach into the 20' required front setback up to 12' and 9' respectively. Staff
believes the applicants have met the Findings necessary for the Planning &
Environmental Commission to grant an approval of their request. Specifically, staff finds
that the applicants have met Finding B.1 in that the granting of the requested variance will
not result in the grant of special privilege. Finding 6.2 has been met, in the opinion of the
6
staff, since the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and that
Finding 6.3(b) has been met since there are extraordinary circumstances, in the form
steep slopes and existing landscape improvements, which precludes the applicant from
developing the lot to its full potential. Additionally, Finding 6.3(c) has also been met,
since the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the other property owners in the same district.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to grant an approval of the
requested variance, staff would suggest that the PEC find that:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same zone district, and;
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity, and;
3. That the variance is warranted since the strict literal enforcement of the
front setback regulation would result in an unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Chapter 18 of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code.
Additionally, staff would recommend that the approval carry with it the following
conditions:
1. That the applicant schedule a hearing before the Vail Town Council for
review af the proposed site plan, prior to appearing before the Tows? of
Vail Design Review Board, as required in the Annexation Agreement of
July 17, 1979; and
2. That the applicant verify the vacation of the 15' wide, utility easement
along the northeriy property line prior the appearing before the Town of
Vail Design Review Board; and
3. That the applicant receive Town of Vail Public Works Department and
Town of Vail Fire Department approval of the proposed site plan prior to
appearing before the Town of Vail Design Review Board; and
4. That the applicant install a construction fence, along the 40% slope line
and the area around the existing landscape improvements, to protect
these areas during the construction process, and that said fence not be
removed until all driveway and building construction is completed.
7
1
s
..1
.95 f 1 ( ?
t
I 1 ~
c?°4 / / ~ ~ / , ^ ~ ~ ' ;
L~oric~
_ _ . _ . . . - • _ . - ' 1
1 ~ ~ • 1 ~ ~ _ A
~ . . - ~_~3~; ~ , , 1 , ; ~
.
. .
.
, . .
I~'a~
` ~
f Y~~1 \
, ~ ~ ' `-1 ~ { r i a~'r~" ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ~LL~ t~~ ~ , _
r
7.
/ / t ~ ~ Y -
L 10?1'~ RI~ I ~ ~ / ~ i~ di~
t ~ ~ \
~ ~ • ~ 1`' ' ~ ~ /
~ ( , ~ • ~ ~
\ ~ ' X ~ , ~ \
~ ~Na
Ll
\ ' , s T~~ i ~ I,~"'~` ~0,~
` ~ ~ \ ~ , ~ / / 1~1~ ° / \j ? 1\ o
/
~ \ \ \ ~ ~ ` ' ~ I/ \ L'~ X i~~~ / ~ ?~6 L~~ ~ \ ~1'~~ i_~ / 9 i~/~// r~? ~ ~
~
'7\
M~r~J\
7 7--
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ . ~ L. .
,
a
SITE PLAN
~r~ ,•-,oLo• o . .
~ .
S0 V• °
I
V~ ~S:
- -
LOZ 27,BLOCK 2, _ -
_ LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION, FILING N0. 3
TOWN OF VAIL,
~ EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
\ • ~s SC<LE: 1 ` s 30'
N 0653'~J' /
29.58 ~ ~'ONS. a~rw~ ro ~ n.+. v raa
Ie19'21'00' 56~. N t639'02' E~
R-65.00 IaR~2~70.21 28.85 ? / 3~' aewiero~.s
L:15.91 m.c~. 60.29 m.n f
1C-5417 \ \ ?6J <oOP T:174.07 .~ry~ .
CB-N 3334'13' w LC-284.77 ~yS{~
~ CB=N 83'48'36' E
(70" R.O.W.)
P LOT 26
~u~
N 58'14'47' W B S
111.58 JA
f~ P+q B J i
CI9~, \O / c^
et o i
I-3T03'25' - ?
R= i 35.00 'b
La87.31 lucl. 8~.08m.n o Y
i.15 24
CB-S ~c }9•43 =e510 ~ LOT 27 ~,v m LOT 25
90 w _:.d
5 63'27'39" E- 29.57
O.
.p
0 \ B9'27'25' W - 0p0 I
~ N 21'11'18' W
83.09 \ r ~
LOT 20 LOT 27
\ e--~e.~ w
RESUBDIViSiON OF BUFFER CREEK SITE PLAN
1.. = 30.-0"
Q
o
D ~
~
OQ LEFTSIDEE~~,~~
DU
0
..nm_.
~
=
~ ~
'y
I
. ~ ~Q~ p ?
U
p? ? ~
? ~
~ OST a LEVATIar~
tM"
~ o.
~ c
~
o~ o
~dG~aT E~.~:a-~ ,
8V{~pWG B
d
~F'f SID~ ELE~1Aµ ~OP~!
, 00 ~~NO n
aa
,
~
,
~
o Q] R
~
1 ~
00
4L o
~nor~
~Cl ~.cac ~1.EV
B~ ~
. i
oa ? ? aa ? ? c~a ? ?
FROPIT ELEVA310N
BURDIN6 A 1/1' - 1'-4T .
I ~
DD
~o
RIGNT SIDE ELEVl1TlOM ' o-
BUILDINO A 1H' • i'-0' » ~ o
I ~
0
~
lFMOOMI2
' KAM
O ~
r
eEDpppYp ~ I
G. i
~ wAd
RNM ~
o r iI .maa~c i.
saow a i
~ =a
...~r.~«.
7.
f' I ~I
m~ '71
J~
~ z. 7 etoleoaa i
I ~ w.4'w~G . i
i
1\
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JI
l~IIOOMO
I ~ II
I
7•
_ _ _ _ _
0
e i yy
UPPER IEVEI FLOOR PLAPI ,
a ~ ~ , '
IN. , Nr
,
~
1 r
1 ~
1 1 /
l 1 / - =
~ o
i'
~ i -
\ 1 i T
~ KI[~~ . 1
~
J~BEIV.~"'--
~H aI
PY&A 1 i r y.
a~nt
~ - ~ ~.4TFR~awro*
awu~~-
-
a
~Y
•d ~ I~ { ` ~ ~
- Sr,m
~
3S
~ ~OPM L~Y ~C~,ti'~+R ~ ~ ~ ~•A
Ni67~~
1
' - _ ;
/
~ I
,---i I
.
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
i
I I I I
I I I 1
~ 1111~
GiARAI?E
M• CBMO
/ / CONfJE1!
-6•
~ . ~ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ '
pq RMy
I I
I I
~ M•CBLIq
sr ~r ~
•r-ar -v ~
I I I I' I I
- -d
J 111~ ~ ~
I l
I I
OARAGE
r-r ca~a
eawcnEre
m.~ vr. x•+o im
t
I I
I y
'
I i
E!(TfP( f I
eawo
taf ~ -
~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I
= le
~ : ..9
L01NER L,EVEL FLOOR PLAIV
. ,
r
% I
- ' ~
%
M
~
i
• Gi i r
~ - - ~'-lof •-6' - S'-2f
x
BEDFtOOM 02
~ ~Aa
~ . ;
-i
- _J
~
grAM
a SUFTE
I : 21 . ~
.
r-s s•-s~ v-a 21-61•yv ~ s.. r err_8 ' _ e• ._s ._u 'p._~. ._o. ~
_________J
~
~
- ~ BEDROOM 117
_
1 ~
= k l
~ -.-J I -
~I
______________J~
~i ~
I~ -
I . -b
~I -
, ~I h_ i ea
-L---------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
t
UPPE62 LEVEL FL(30R PLAPd
eua.oiNO A vs• , ra k1
• 'Q
ra c
~ a
I
I
1 DINIrN~O AREA
~ " srwr •
' .
LI'tiNOAREA
i )
Y Q
DINNO AFEA
' ~ .
tLL
i .v - . .
~ tm?KiAREA
C~ i ~ j~ ~ S I
_ P s
? I ~ DININO AREA
i ~
EDRO~
~ ~ I ~`i'~~ BEDROOWQ ~EDROOMp
_ .
L1NNO/~AE7~ ,a---------'-___'__
i r
~5911" 1 ~ ~ v~ v
_ i - ~ - -
O
3v O ~ . ~
arNns ~ . • • ~ - -
- ~i -
- - MAS7ER SUrtE ~
_ ,t,P1M•
]l POt '
)'-0' ~'3'-BP ]'-OY ~
BEOROOM 02 , BEDFIOqA /3 - -
i
i
I ~
i
MAliV LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
BURDINO A /M' - T-0'
r i
r J
_ - _i
1
l~ I
I
I
_ __'__'_'___i
~ I
Y •
~ 10 n I
I ~
~ I
- - - x
~
y SI 3i l~ I
• ~ j, 1'-2 3'-4• k 20'-5/ B'
^ / h n
f •-6• y~ ~
I
~ 1?7 ~
RMY I I I (3ARpGE
~ ' rwiwr 1 I I ~ ~ i
~ .
~ ,
~ k ~ • I
I 1 ~
M r-n• I I
r~ frM1s I 1 I I' r I I I _
~ ~r I I I I n ~
J 111 j GApAGE
oorRn
- ~ ' nrt~sr
I
I
Sr ~ YY N H I
~ 3'-3/ 3'-~• '-B•
PI
' • '
- .L~
6ARAGE . ~
~ I I ! •v°.°~ia y ' • ~ -
_
~
~ - ,
~ , -
r r I
I ~
LOWEBi LEVEL FLOOR PL4M = W ~
suu.oiex?A iu• - r.a ~ - ~
.
.
LOT 27, LLC
VAIL, COLORADO
July 15, 1996
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Attn: Mr. George Ruther
Re: Property Line Set-back Variance
Dear Sir:
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing users or structures in the
vicinity will have no adverse effect whatsoever. I am requesting the ability to maximize
the buildable area of the site. Lionsridge Loop when constructed is outside the road
right-of-way to the north. Therefore, Lot 27, Block 2, Filing 3 northem most property
lines are in excess of 50' offthe road.
Our request is to be able to build up to the northern property line which will a11ow for
more spacing between four triplex buildings being proposed. The 20' set-back
requirement is to provide some buffer between roads and developments. Allowing this
variance will still provide a 50' set-back from Lionsridge Loop. In this case the variance
will actually improve spacing and allow more buffer from Cap Stone, which is along the
southern property line of Lot 27.
The property is zoned medium density for development of up to 14 dwelling units. Our
proposal is reducing by two the number of units while using the GRFA square footage
allowed. -
Enclosed for your review is the site plan with improvement elevations. As this request
relates to property line set-back variance the exterior design of the units will add some
Gables to the front of the buildings. This will be shown in the design review board
submittal.
Thank you for your consideration of our proposal.
Sincerely,
XS
1 t
APPRQYEPS'Ep a 9 ~
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
- August 26, 1996
Minutes
MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT:
Greg Moffet Henry Pratt Susan Connelly
Greg Amsden Mike Moliica Galen Aasland Dorninic Maurielio
John Schofieid George Ruther
Gene Uselton Judy Rodriguez
Diane Golden
Public Hearing 2:00 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Greg Moffet at 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for height and front setback variances to allow for the construction of four
triplex buildings, located at 1894 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 27, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3.
Applicant: Steven Gensler and Stephen Katz
Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an oveNiew of the request. At the August 12, 1996 PEC meeting, the
applicant had requested variances of 17' and 19' respectively, to encroach into the front setback.
After a lengthy discussion, the PEC voted unanimously to table the request until the applicant
redesigned the project with less encroachment into the front setback. The PEC was generally
agreeable to permitting some form of encroachment, but agreed that the amount requested was
excessive and needed to be reduced. George went on to explain that the applicant had come
back with a reduction from 17' and 19', to 12' and 9' of encroachment. Buildings have been
shifted on the site plan. One of the concerns from the 1994 request and the August 12, 1996
PEC meeting was the emergency vehicle turnaround at the southerly portion of the site. The
developer has pulled the turnaround out of the setback area, in order to provide snow storage,
which the Fire Department has approved. There are three 10' tall Lodgepole trees that need to
be moved. It is up to the PEC to decide a location on the site that would work, so the trees can
be preserved on the property.
Greg Moffet asked if the applicant was here. He was not present. Greg then asked for any
public input.
Phyllis Mango, owner of Capstone #1, reviewed what happened 2 years ago when the
Commission rnet. Mr. Gensler has not increased the space between the buildings, nor has he
stayed away from the gardens. He wants to move trees, that are 15' tall, only 5', which is not
much of a move. He plans to put them on boulders. Trees do not grow on boulders. We would
like to suggest not moving the trees. In 1979, Rocky Christopher planted those trees as a barrier
to benefit both parcels. I have a letter here•from him`and from Mr. Toffel to do so. Capstone has
an implied easement to use that property~_.
,~i: -
Planning and Environmental'Commission
Minutes
' August 26, I 996 1
.
<
Greg Moffet asked if the document had been recorded?
Phyliis said, no.
Greg Moffet said then that was a legai issue between the parties and that the PEC could not
recognize anything that was not recorded.
Phyllis Mango said at the last meeting it was impiied that we were trespassers. We were granted
the licensed easement from Mr. Toffel. We spoke with him in Tucson. Those are our trees. You
can't take away someone's license. I ask you to search your conscience. This is an issue of
only 5', but it has a huge impact. I ask you to stand by your environmental titles.
Greg Moffet asked for any other input.
Steve*Gensler said we have tried to redesign the project to get as far away from the front
setback as we could. As far as Capstone, we readjusted the buildings and only need to
transplant one tree. We went over the new drawings with the Vail Point owners. We wanted
Buifdings 7, 8 and 9 to slide into the setback. We are only taking away the highway view from
the Lionsridge Loop homeowners. The problem with the homeowners is the tot lot. They don't
want it, but prefer to store snow there. The tot lot is sitting right next to a cliff. The only way to
get a CO is to get signatures from the homeowners stating that they don't want the tot lot. They
deserve to have COs. We would like to put snow next to Building # 7, storing it on our property
down below instead of building more units there. We have tried to listen to comments from the
PEC in our redesign. -
Galen Aasland stated there was a hardship because of the steepness of the lot. With regard to
Units 1, 2 and 3; there is no hardship and therefore, no way to support a variance. I would like to
see you address the trash issue and snow storage better. You can't put all the snow in the
hammerhead. A suggestion for Unit #7 might be to take off the dining room . I feel sorry for the
Capstone units. The Capstone owners have been given a gift for many years. It will cost
Capstone some money to deal with this, since Mr. Gensler has a right to develop his property. I
would like to see as much landscaping maintained there as possible.
Diane Golden would rather have the front variance and leave 7, 8 and 9 where they are. Phyllis,
with regard to Capstone, it is beautiful back there and lovely and i feel they will be able to ksep
everything, except some of the trees. I agree with Galen as it is the developer's right.
John Schofield echoed the comments. Rocky Christopher knows enough about real estate to
have recorded the document. Buildings 1, 2 and 3 are ok.
Gene Uselton asked the developer if he considered interchanging Units 1, 2 and 3, with 11 and
12? Steve Gensler said 1, 2 and 3 don't bother anyone. I would like to use wider units for profit
reasons, but if narrow units are the only way io get this approved, I will do narrow units.
Gene Uselton asked if snow storage would be a probtem down on Buffer Creek and how is
garbage removed from each unit?
. ~ .
Steve Gensler said, yes, garbage will be emoved from each unit.
.
Planning and Environmental Commission
• Minutes
h. August26.1996' 2
i
2
J
Greg Amsden para(leled John Schofield's comments regarding rearranging 1, 2 and 3. You must
architecturally modify the product to keep it out of the setback, based on the developer's desire.
Greg doesn't have a problem with 7, 8 and 9.
Greg Moffet said specificaliy 10, 8 and 9 reduce the totai variance. Now you need to make the
Unit 1 encroachment go away. Building # 7's encroachment is ok, because of the hardship.
Regarding the landscaping in the back; if Phyllis thinks they have an easement, then they must
go and find out. As it stands here, iYs a straight case of private property. Mr. Gensler has a right
to do what he wants. I get the feeling from the commission that Unit #1 has an encroachment
that must go away.
George Ruther said the location ot 8uildings 1, 2 and 3 becomes a DRB issue. The 3 trees that
are proposed to be moved on the site plan, can be moved 5'. Is that plan acceptable, or would
the PEC desire the trees to be moved somewhere else?
Greg Moffet asked for inch for inch tree loss mitigation which is appropriate for the DRB to
handle.
Greg Amsden asked Phyllis if she might want the trees moved onto the Capstone site.
Phyllis Mango said the purpose of the trees was to be a shield between the parcets and would
just like them to survive the move.
Steve Gensler said we would work with Capstone to move the trees. Greg Moffet said the trees need to live, or be replaced.
Diane Golden asked if the trees could be moved anywhere on the property or on Capstone's
property?
Greg Moffet said iYs up to Steve where the trees go.
Phyllis Mango wants a working solution and would like to have the trees higher up on the wall to
benefit the new owners.
Steve Gensler said since they are Capstone's trees, Capstone can move them wherever they
want. He doesn't want to be responsible for the trees.
Phyllis Mango asked about the bonding issue.
Greg Moffet said we require a bond sufficient to have the trees live, or be replaced. We do
transplant a lot of trees; iYs not uncommon.
Phyllis Mango said it negates that idea, if he's putting it in our laps.
Galen Aasland made a motion for approval to grant a variance for Unit # 7 for only a 12'
encroachment, because it meets the variance criteria . Before the applicant goes to the DRB,
they need to submit a snow removal plan, bond for 3 evergreen trees for a period of two growing
seasons, assure no stone wall, on Mr Gensler's property, be at a height greater than 6'.
. .
- .
Planning apd Environmcntai Commission
Minutes
August 26, 1996 3
~
v`-
' .
.j
Gene Uselton seconded the motion.
Galen Aasland amended the motion to add that the staff recommendation, on page 7 of the staff
memo, be included in the motion.
Gene Uselton seconded the amended motion.
Greg Moffet stated so included and so moved and asked for any other input.
Gene Uselton said that it was reasonabie and equitable for the Capstone residents to have the
opportunity to move the trees where they like as an alternative to the bond.
Galen Aasland said the bond was required of Mr. Gensler, if he moved the trees.
George Ruther said if Capstone wants to move the trees at their own expense, Steve Gensler
would grant them the right to come on to his property to do so. Staff woutd not enforce the
bonding on the developer, if Capstone moved the trees onto their property.
Galen Aasland asked if Mr. Gensler would be subject to the replacement of those trees on his
property, if the trees were removed from his property?
Greg Moffet said we are referring to the trees as Capstone's trees. 1Ne are not making a
judgement as to who owns those trees.
John Schofie.ld said we would allow Capstone to move the trees at their own expense.
Greg Moffet said that that was implied in the motion.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
Phyllis Mango asked who will move the trees?
Mike Mollica said that Steve Gensler would determine that and present it to the DRB.
2. A request for a major SDD amendment to allow for the enclosure of a roof deck located at
12 Vail Road/Lot N, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st
Applicant: Vail Apartments, Inc.
Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an overview of the request and presented the two main issues; the view
from the roundabout and the compatibility of the addition with the architecture already existing on
the Gateway Building. We have received an approval letter from the Vail Gateway Condo
Association for Unit 5 to enclose the exterior deck. The Association has no objection to this
proposal.
Greg Moffet said because it is an SDD, there is not a cap on the GRFA.
; -
,
Plaming and Emironmental Commission
• Minutes
, August 26,1996: 4
~ .
r
West Vail Interchange
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
Item Item Cost
Roadway $7309000
Retaining Walls $6309000
Bridge $1,090,000
Drainage & Utilities $4409000
Surveying, Design & Permits $4009000
Construction Management & Testing $5459000
Landscaping $7509000
Construction Traffic Control $2509000
Mobilization & Contingencies $6659000
Project Total 1$595009000
1997 1998
Task Name S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N
Notice to Proceed ~ 10/14/96 :
Preliminary Design
Field Inspection Review ~ 11/29/96
(FIR)
Final Design
,
Final Of~ice Review (FOR) ~ 1/31/97
Advertise Project
Award Construction 0 3/15/97
Contract
Begin Construction ~ 4/1/97
Phase 1,2,and 3
Construction
Complete Major '
~ 11/1/97:
Construction
Phase 4 Construction ? ?
Project Completion West Vail Interchange 6/15/98 *
. .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8' -1 i
~
/4' i 34.5'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B/KE PATH GORE CREEK
. SECTION THROUGH BRIDGE
BIKE PATH UNDER BRIOGE CONCEPT
EAST VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Officers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gratmn
Directors - Judith Berkowitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie Caulkins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder
Agenda
Vail Village President's Advisory Committee
Vai1 Village Noise Issues
July 24, 1996
3:00 p.m.
Mountain Haus
1. Call to Order: Jim Lamont, Executive Director
2. Introductions:
3. Overview of Issues:
4. Topics for Discussion:
a. Amplified Sound:
1. Scope of Amplified Sound Ordinance and enforcement program.
2. Effectiveness of ordinance provisions and enforcement program.
3. Definition and scope of problem.
a. Purpose and intent of amplit'ied sound and its regulation.
b. Adequacy of decibel levels
c. Building controls for entertainment uses.
d. Hours of operation
e. Enforcement
b. Late Night Revelers:
1. Definition and scope of problem.
2. Existing prohibitions.
c. Special Events:
1. Definition and scope of problem.
2. Existing prohibitions.
a. Amplified Sound.
b. Hours of operation.
5. Recommended Remediation Strategies:
a. AmpliGed Sound:
1. Increase restrictive regulations and proactive enforcement.
- 2. Building controls for entertainment operators.
3. Outright ban.
b. Late Night Revelers:
1. Regulation and enforcement.
c. Special Events:
1. Regulation and enforcement.
d. Working relRtionship with Vail Viilage businesses.
6. Other Nuisance Noise Sources:
7. Recornmended Remediation Strategies:
8. Adjaurnment:
Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorado 81658
Telephone: (970) 827-5680 Message/FAX: (970) 827-5856
(.t95 lQ • 1~t la l~'~Guc- ~ 5
I
. ~
vail
Village
Merchant
Association ~~i~,H.4-~-~ lb~ k/o PO BoX 2135, Val CO 8I658
To: Town of Vail Council Members
From: Vail Village Merchant Association
_ Re: Revised Proposal for Funding Turn It Up!
Date: Ocotber 1,1996
Honorable Councilmembers,
The Vail Village Merchant Association and the Lionshead Merchant Association are
before Town Council Members to ask for assistance in funding the T'urn It Up! Vail
`96 program. The program breaks down as follows:
Frontline employee customer service training $13,000
Holly Steil Speaker
Kick Off to `96 Party $5,000
(pending no food sponsor)
Advertising Costs $1,500
Publicity Person $1,500
Administrative Costs $1,500
Other _ $1,000
Total $23,500
Current Financial Contributions
NOWS Services $5,000
lst Bank of Vail $1,000
Clearly, funding is a difficult task at this time and the Merchant Associations are asking for yQUr assistance.
Sincerely,
Vail Village Merchant Association
Lionshead Merchant Association
RECEIV'_D: 9-27-96; 12:15PM; 970 478 0269 TOV HUMAN RESOURCE; qi
9-27-1996 12:29PM FROM CURTIN HILL 970 476 0269 p_1
Va.i1
Vi11age
Merchant
Association PO Box 2135, ''Val, CO 81668
To: Tcrwn af Vai1 Council Members
From: `V'ai,l Village 1VXuchant Association
Re: Praposal for FundXng Ttiun Xt Up!
Date; Septeznber 26,1996
Honorable Couneiamembers,
The Vail Village Merchant Association and the Lionshead Merc.hant Association are
befare Town Council Membezs to aslc foz assistance in fuadaOg the Ttarn It Up tVail.
196 progXam_ The prograin breaks down as follows:
k'rontline einployee customer service training $13,000
Holly St,eil Speaker
. Kick flff ta °96 Party $3,000
Advertisxng $2,000
A,tlministrative Costs $1,540
Other $1,(}00
Total $20,5Q0
Current Finamcial Contribudons. $5,000
Balance <,$X 5,500>
Clearly, funding is a dif£icult task at this time and the 1Vler0hant Assacxations are
&ddng fox your assistarice.
5inecrelY,
V'<til Village Merchant AssociaCion
Lionshead Merchant Associaaon
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
September 3, 1996
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, September 3, 1996, in the Council
Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:35 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-tem
Kevin Foley
Rob Ford
Mike Jewett -
Paul Johnston
Ludwig Kurz
MEMBERS ABSENT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Town of Vail resident, Jo Staufer stated that
while his in-laws (ages 90 and 91) were in Vail recently, the most enjoyable part of their visit was the
streamwalk. Jo suggested the Town finish the stream walk from Ford Park to Lionshead.
Next, Audrey McLean, a resident of the Village Center condos distributed a letter to council members
regarding noise and drunken behavior in the Village. She said the noise was caused by Garton's Saloon
and other amplified sound, which, she said had been unbearable over the past three years.
Item number two on the agenda was the Consent Agenda which consisted of the approval of the
minutes for the meetings of August 6 and 20, 1996. Paul Johnston moved to approve the Consent
Agenda with minor changes, and Sybill seconded the motion. A vote was then taken and approved
unanimously, 7-0.
Third on the agenda was the appointment of one Local Licensing Authority member to fill an unexpired
term to expire June, 97. One letter of interest was received from M. Kathy Vieth. Rob moved to appoint
Kathy to fill the unexpired term due to terminate June, 1997. Sybill seconded the motion and a vote was
taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Agenda item number four was Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1996, first reading of an Ordinance Amending
Title 18 Zoning, Sections 18.24.020, 18.24.030, 18.24.040, 18.24.050, 18.27.030, 18.28.030, 18.28.040
and 18.29.030 of the Zoning Code to Add Brew Pub as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Core 1,
Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3, Commercial Service Center and Arterial Business Zone Districts
and Delete Brew Pubs as a Permitted Use in the Commercial Service Center Zone District of the Vail
Municipal Code. Mayor Armour read the title in full.
Town of Vail Planner, Dominic Mauriello presented the item and provided the following background: The
applicant, Vail Associates, Inc., was requesting a Zoning Code amendment to allow brew pubs as a
conditional use in the Commercial Core 2(CC2) zone district (Lionshead commercial area). Brew pubs
were a permitted use in the Commercial Service Center (CSC) zone district (Crossroads commercial
area) for establishments operating without off-site sales and as a conditional use for brew pubs with off-
site sales. He continued, stating the permitted and conditional uses for the CC2 district reference the
uses in the Commercial Core 1(CC1) zone district (Vail Village commercial area) and therefore both
districts should be amended. Dominic said that a comprehensive analysis of all of the Town's
commercial districts was done by staff to see if brew pubs would be an appropriate and compatible use
in other districts. Based on the analysis staff believed that brew pubs should be listed as a conditional
use in all of the commercial zone districts including: Commercial Core 1(CC1), Commercial Core 2
(CC2), Commercial Core 3(CC3) (West Vail commercial area), Commercial Service Center (CSC) and
Arterial Business (ABD) (Glen Lyon commercial area) zone districts. Dominic explained that it was staff's
belief that with the current definition and existing limitations, brew pubs could be a positive and
compatible use in the CC1, CC2, CC3, CSC and ABD zone districts. The PEC, at its August 12, 1996
1 Vail Town Coundl Evening Mee6ng Minutes September 3, 7996
. meeting, unanimously recommended approval of the proposed amendment, and the recommendation
of staff was also was for approval of Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1996, on first reading, he said.
Mayor Armour noted for the record a letter which was received from Jim Lamont representing the East
Village Homeowners Association, opposing the proposed amendment in CC1 because of an unresolved
dilemma of truck delivery in the Village.
PEC member, Greg Moffet was on hand to answer questions and stated it was in his opinion a very
appropriate use for the CC1 district.
Mayor Armour stated that operating a brew pub was not a use by right, and applicants would have to
apply for conditional use permit.
Paul Johnston spoke about the unresolved dilemma of truck delivery and potential problems which could
occur because of off-site consumption, delivery, and sales. Paul then moved to approve a modified
version of Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1996, excluding the CC1 zone district from the ordinance. Sybill
seconded the motion.
Mike Jewett then asked if CC1 would then be discussed separately at a later time and Mayor Armour
explained that the intent was to not allow brew pubs in the CC1 zone district at all.
A vote was taken and passed 4-3, Rob Ford, Bob Armour, and Kevin Foley voting in opposition.
Fifth on the agenda was Resolution No. 16, Series of 1996, a resolution determining the necessity of,
and authorizing the acquisition of an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned by the Lodge
at Lionshead by either negotiation or condemnation for Town public purposes. Mayor Armour read the
title in full.
Town Attorney Tom Moorhead presented the item, and provided the following background: The Town
of Vail had recently opened bids for a street project to take place in the area of the Town of Vail Library
and Dobson Arena. Th e street project would require a temporary construction easement and a
permanent street easement on property that is owned by the Lodge at Lionshead, Tom said. The Town
of .Vail had been involved in negotiations with the Lodge at Lionshead through its Property Manager, Jeff
Bailey, and that an appraisal of the fair market value was being completed by Shields Appraisal Services.
He said the town planned to enter into an agreement for immediate possession at which time the fair
market value.as determined by Shields would be tendered to the Lodge at Lionshead in exchange for
immediate possession. It would then be incumbent upon the association to acquire the agreement of
its unit owners as to the fair market value of the easements in question. In the event that such approval
is not forthcoming, it may become necessary to file an action in the Eagle County District Court for a final
determination as to the fair market value. Staff's recommendation was for approval of Resolution No.
16, Series of 1996.
Larry Grafel spoke regarding the necessity of the easement, its use for public purpose, and said it was
essential to complete the project. Tom presented a color coded map depicting the temporary and
permanent easement sites, which Larry reviewed with Council members. Rob Ford moved to approve
Resolution No. 16, Series of 1996, with a second from Paul Johnston.
Kevin Foley thanked Suzanne Silverthorne for sending out a media release informing the public of
upcoming construction projects. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Agenda item number six was Resolution No. 17, Series of 1996, a resolution determining the necessity
of, and authorizing the acquisition of an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned by the Vail
das Shone Condominium Association by either negotiation or condemnation for Town public purposes.
Mayor Armour read the title in full. Larry Grafel presented the item and stated it was necessary to
acquire a temporary construction easement and a perpetual nonexclusive access easement over
property which was owned by the Vail das Shone Condominium Association for access to the
development and improvements taking place on Vail Commons. An appraisal of the fair market value
of the easements was being completed by Shields Appraisal Services. The fair market value of the
easements would be tendered to the association in exchange for immediate possession of the property
involved in the easements. Negotiations befinreen various affected entities including WestStar Bank, a
tenant of Vail das Shone, had been productive and Larry said he anticipated such negotiations would
result in agreements for immediate possession. In the event Vail das Shone Condominium Association
was unable to receive the approval of all the unit owners, it might be necessary to file an action in the
Eagle County District Court for a final determination on the fair market value. The staff recommended
2 Vail Town Council Evenin9 Meeting Minutes September 3, 1996
~
. Council adopt Resolution No. 17, Series of 1996. Town Manager Bob McLaurin explained the easement
would provide interior circulation to the project. Sybill then moved to approve Resolution No. 17, Series
of 1996 and Ludwig Kurz seconded the motion. A vote was taken and passed 6-0-1, Mike Jewett
abstaining. Agenda item number seven, was Resolution No. 18, Series of 1996, a resolution determining the
necessity of, and authorizing the acquisition of an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned
by the Vail Golf Course Townhomes Phase I by either negotiation or condemnation for Town public
purposes.
Agenda item number eight was Resolution No. 19, Series of 1996, a resolution determining the necessity
of, and authorizing the acquisition of an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned by the Vail
Golf Course Townhomes Phase II by either negotiation or condemnation for Town public purposes.
Agenda item number nine was Resolution No. 20, Series of 1996, a resolution determining the necessity
of, and authorizing the acquisition of an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned by the
Fallridge Recreational Facilities by either negotiation or condemnation for Town public purposes.
Resolution Nos. 18, 19, and 20, Series of 1996, were then considered simultaneously. Mayor Armour
read the titles in full and Larry Grafel reviewed a diagram depicting the easements which would give right
of way for the road itself, and stated such easements were required to complete the project, a
housekeeping item, he said.
Rob Ford moved to approve Resolution Nos. 18, 19, and 20, Series of 1996, and Sybill seconded the
motion. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Tenth on the agenda was a report from the Town Manager. Bob McLaurin stated he had nothing to add
to his memorandum.
Larry Grafel then described improvements scheduled to begin later in the week near the library and the
ice arena. Improvements were to include adjustments on rock walls in front of the arena, repaving,
widening the chute to create a sidewalk, drainage improvements, installation of a hydronic snow melt
system, and landscaping. Council was then asked by Town Manager, Bob McLaurin to authorize a
transfer of funds from the East Lionshead Bus Stop project to complete the $452,000 project. Sybill
moved to approve the fund transfer as requested, and Ludwig seconded the motion. Kevin Foley
confirmed three large trees were to remain and that a rock wall would be built around them.
Mayor Bob Armour advised Council members review and be aware of the Blue Ribbon Panel Report, a
panel appointed by the Governor which identifies the long term transportation needs for the state.
There being no further business a motion was made for adjournment and the meeting was adjourned at
approximately 8:30 p.m.
A public service announcement was then made and Council members reminded the Channel 5 viewing
audience of the upcoming activities associated with the Vail Tomorrow project.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTE'ST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Holly McCutcheon
(*Names of certain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
3 Vail Town Council Evening Mee6ng Minutes September 3, 7996
. MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
September 17, 1996
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, September 17, 1996, in the Council Chambers
of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:40 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-tem
Kevin Foley Rob Ford
Mike Jewett
Paul Johnston
Ludwig Kurz
MEMBERS ABSENT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Josef Staufer, Town of Vail resident and owner of the Vail
Village Inn expressed his concerns about plans for employee housing units proposed at Red Sandstone on
property owned by the water district and land to be exchanged to the Town by the U.S. Forest Service. Mr. Staufer
said he supported employee housing and noted that he paid in excess of $10,000 per month to help provide such
housing for his staff, but stated he objected to selling such units for private ownership. Staufer said that as an
involved party in Action Vail, the group is opposed to public lands being sold for private ownership. He used Pitkin
Creek as an example of units constructed for the purpose of employee housing, which, he said are now owned
mostly by second homeowners and non-employees. Mr. Staufer suggested the Town of Vail retain ownership of
the project and rent the units out.
Town Manager, Bob McLaurin, explained that many decisions remained yet to be made with regard to the Red
Sandstone project. He stated that Council would be reviewing details more thoroughly and would have an
opportunity to make decisions during upcoming meetings scheduled throughout November.
Next, Vail resident, Sue Dugan suggested marking the lanes of the roundabouts at the Main Vail interchange.
Also, she said the issue of animal control needed improvement, in particular dog waste. Ms Dugan said she
noticed improvement when "clean it up" signs were placed in her neighborhood and suggested the town erect more
signs throughout the community. Finally, Ms. Dugan addressed the need for a bus stop between the Wren and
Apollo Park, stating it was unsafe to walk that distance on South Frontage Road in the winter. Dugan then
introduced the Wren's General Manager, Lisa Watts.
Lisa announced she had scheduled a meeting with Public Works Director, Larry Grafel to address the concern.
Ms. Watts said the situation was very dangerous due to the lack of a sidewalk. Additionally, she said the
streamwalk was not maintained in the winter and was too slick to be used.
Sue Dugan then referenced a letter which had been faxed to Council members regarding the Buddy's program,
and encouraged all to participate.
Next, under citizen participation, Michael Jewett appeared before fellow Council members on behalf of the
Common Sense for the Commons Committee. Mr. Jewett reviewed the history of the group and its initial purpose
to persuade the Council to put the project up to a vote of the citizens. He said fundraising had always been an
issue for individuals involved with the committee, and explained that members had wanted the matter to go to a
vote. When it didn't, the committee wanted the project investigated for legal issues and retained Hugh Warder,
a Glenwood Springs attorney, to investigate the original request for proposal ("RFP") process, and contract
negotiations, among other issues. Jewett said he was before Council to announce that because of costs involved,
and the potential of the matter being tied up in a lengthy lawsuit, his group would be dissolving the Common
Sense for the Commons Committee and their fundraising efforts. Jewett was critical about the RFP process, and
said he did not believe the town sent out 50 RFP's as he had been told. He said he would have preferred a
department store such as Target as an anchor to the project as opposed to City Market, one that would not have
competed with retail business in West Vail. He recommended the issue of competition be taken into consideration
by Council in the future. Additionally, Jewett expressed his disappointment that the Council failed to recognize a.
petition which was brought in, asking for a public vote on the project. He then announced the issue was over and
suggested everyone move on.
Lars Berkhout, a resident of Sandstone said he worked with Mike Jewett and complimented the project, but
complained about the huge wall of plaster on the west side. He said he hoped that in the future citizen input would
be taken into consideration, and suggested that at the time petitions were presented, some motivations of Council
1 Vail Town Counal Evening Meetlng Minutes September 17, 1996
members seemed suspicious.
Next, Dan Charboneau, camera operator for Vail Valley Community Television and a Vail resident, announced his
departure from Vail to return to the East Coast. He complimented the Council for keeping the interests of the
citizens in mind and thanked the Council for its support of Channel 5. Mayor Armour then commended Dan on
his expertise, a job well done, and wished him good luck.
Item number two on the agenda was a status update on the Vail Tomorrow process. Bob McLaurin gave a brief
update following the Imagine Vail Tomorrow Community Conference which was held on Saturday, September 7,
1996. He said more than 130 people attended the conference in which participants identified 11 goal areas for
the project: world class resort, natural & built environment, growth management, safety and security, building
community, economic diversity, affordable housing, cultural and educational opportunities, youth, family and
regional cooperation. He said procedures had included drafting goal statements for the 11 areas and doing
research, and that during the following month information would be gathered on each of the goal areas for Vail
and three comparison communities (Aspen, Whistler, and Sanibel, Florida). The information would then be shared
at the next conference, "Describe Vail Tomorrow," scheduled for Nov. 1 and 2. The purpose of the research would
be to describe how Vail and other would-class resorts fare in each of the goal areas. Bob said it was important
for people to understand the need to participate in the next conference to make sure their voices were heard on
the issues that are important to them. After the November conference, teams will form around prioritized goal
areas and action alternatives suggested and will begin making recommendations for action. Mayor Bob Armour
commended all those who organized and participated in the recent conference.
Third on the agenda was Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1996, first reading of an Ordinance amending Special
Development District No. 21, the Vail Gateway Building, and amending the development plan in accordance with
Chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicant, Vail
Apartment, Inc. (Owners of Unit 5) was represented by Steve Riden. Town of Vail Planner, George Ruther
presented the item and described that pursuant to a memorandum from the Community Development Department
staff to the Planning and Environmental Commission, dated August 26, 1996, the initial SDD approval allowed for
the construction of 12 dwelling units and consisted of not more than a total of 13,000 sq. ft. of GRFA. He said the
developer chose to construct only seven dwelling units, utilizing a total of 11,999 sq. ft. , leaving 1,001 sq. ft. of
the approved GRFA and 5 dwelling units which were not constructed. A remodel of a unit in the fall of 1995 added
356 sq.ft., increasing the total GRFA contained within the building to 12,355. George explained that the applicant
was now proposing to modify Unit No. 5, adding another 460 square feet of new GRFA, which would result in a
new total GRFA for the Gateway project of 12,815 sq. ft. He said such request would require a major SDD
amendment, and the Council was asked to review certain criteria as follows: Design compatibility and sensitivity
to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk,
building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. George then distributed a letter
from Norman Helwig, attorney at law, representing the interests of the Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium
Association, which stated that the approval of the Association for the approval of the addition to Unit 5 had not yet
been received, but was expected at an upcoming meeting of Association members.
The staff recommendation was for approval of Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1996, on first reading with the following
conditions: 1) that the applicant be required to provide Community Development with an approval letter from the
Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Association, prior to scheduling the second reading of the ordinance; and 2)
prior to scheduling second reading of the ordinance, the illegal, neon illumination on the directory sign located on
the west side of the Gateway Building, be removed and brought into compliance with the original DRB approval.
Steve Riden, on behalf of Vail Apartments, Inc. (owners of Unit 5), stated he had no objections to the approval,
but was concerned with the condition of the neon sign being brought into compliance. He suggested it could be
handled in a different manner, such as a citation, rather than including it as a condition of approval, as the owners
of Unit 5 had no authority to require the removal of the sign.
Sybill Navas asked Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead, for his opinion, and Tom stated there were are a number of
different routes that could be taken. However, he felt that placing the condition as referenced above was the
Town's first best opportunity to bring it into compliance. If it did not work, he said, then the town would proceed
with the citation process.
Paul Johnston moved to table Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1996, until such time as approval from the condominium
association was received and the sign was in compliance. Rob Ford seconded the motion. Sybill said she was
inclined to vote for passage of the ordinance on first reading with conditions stated. Ludwig said he felt there were
to many inconsistencies and would go along with tabling the ordinance. Mike Jewett was in favor of staff's
recommendation and moving ahead with approval on first reading along with the conditions suggested.
Paul again moved to table Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1996 until such time as the application was complete and
an agreement reached to bring the illegal neon sign into compliance. A vote was taken and passed, 5-2, Sybill and
Mike voting in opposition.
Agenda item number four was Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1996, Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1996, second
reading of an Ordinance Amending Title 18 Zoning, Sections 18.26.040, 18.27.030, 18.28.030, 18.28.040 and
18.29.030 of the Zoning Code to Add Brew Pub as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core
3, Commercial Service Center and Arterial Business Zone Districts and Delete Brew Pubs as a Permitted Use in
the Commercial Service Center Zone District of the Vail Municipal Code. Town of Vail Planner pominic Mauriello
2 Vail Town Council Evening Meetin9 Minutes September 17, 1996
s
, introduced the item and presented a modified version of the ordinance, which excluded the Commercial Core 1
area, as moved by Council at first reading of the ordinance on September 3.
Rob moved to approve Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1996, with a second from Sybill. Kevin Foley said the reason
he was voting against the ordinance was because it excluded the Commercial Core 1 zone district. Mayor Armour
also felt that staff could control establishments applying for a brew pub businesses on an individual basis, if the
Commercial Core 1 zone district was included in the ordinance. A vote was then taken and passed, 6-1, Kevin
Foley opposed.
Fifth on the agenda was a report from the Town Manager. Bob McLaurin explained that the existing signage at
the main Vail roundabout was temporary, and that new signage would be installed within the next couple of weeks
which woutd comply with Federal Highway Administration and Department of Transportation standards. He also
talked about Council goal setting, issues and strategies, and his feeling that the Vail Tomorrow process was an
important component in achieving Council goals which were defined last February. He then encouraged all to stay
involved.
There being no further business a motion was made for adjournment and the meeting was adjourned at
approximately 8:50 p.m.
Respectfuliy submitted,
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Holly McCutcheon
(*Names of certain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
3 Vail Town Cowicil Evening Meeting Minutes September 17, 7996
\
11
Iy
TOWN OF YAIL 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Manager
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-21 S7
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Robert W. McLaurin
Town Manager
DATE: October 1, 1996
SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report
Council Goals and Strategies
We are continuing to work with the goals and strategies articulated by the Council several months
ago. Specifically, we are working to define and refine the action steps necessary to achieve your
goals and priorities. For your information I have attached a copy of the latest draft of this
document. As you can see, we have wherever possible, extended the work program out as far as
possible. I hope to finalize this document next week and present to you a final copy at that time.
ICMA Conference
parsuant to my employment agreement I will be attending the International City Managers
Association conference in Washington, D.C. I will be ieaving Thursday afternoon. Foilowing the
conference I intend to take several days of personal leave and will be back in Vail on October 13.
Anne wi11 have a number where I can be reached during this time and I will be checking my
messages and E-mail daily.
Dowd Junction Bike Path
Despite the poor weather in September, the Dowd Junction Bike Path is proceeding at an
acceptable pace. However, it appears that because of poor weather we will delay paving the
"platform" until next spring. This will allaw the platform to settle and will provide a more stable
surface when complete.
RWM/aw
Attachment
RECYCLEDPAPER
4VAIL
TOWN TRANSPORTATION -
THE GOAL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL IS TO PROVIDE FOR THE SAFE AND EFFICIENT MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS WITHIN THE TOWN OF
VAIL. THE TOWN IS COMMITTED TO A MUL71 MODEL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL, AND WITHIN THE REGION.
Strate ies
a. Improve the efficiency of the TOV Transit System.
b. Work with the Regional Transportation Authority to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Regional Transportation System.
c. Work to provide for the efficient delivery and distribution of goods in Vail Village and Lionshead.
d. Provide for the safe movement of bicyclists and pedestrians within the TOV and in the region.
e. Maintain a safe and efficient street system in the Town of Vail. Minimize congestion.
f. Work with the Rail Coalition to secure the abandoned Southern Pacific railroad right of way.
1996 Actions ResponsibilitV_ Time Budpet tmpactlFundina
* Plan and select preferred alternative McLaurin, Hall, Grafel, Silverthorn 10196 $75,000'
for the West Vail Interchange
* Complete the Dowd Junction Bike Path Grafel, Hall 11196 $1,200,000"
" Complete library chute pedestrian improvements Grafel, Oppenheimer. Hall, McLaurin 11l96 $450,000
' Analyze Simba Run Options Hall, Grafel, McLaurin complete NA""
Identify sites for park and ride lots Grafel, Hall, Rose, McLaurin 12/96 NA
*$75,000 will fund the technical analysis and public parficipation element necessary to select a preferred afternative. Once the Council has selected an alternative the construction design and preparation of contract
documents will cost approximately $150,000. The cost of the actual construction will be a function of the selected alternative. To date $300,000 has been aflocated from CDOT. We will be pursuing additional funding for
the construction of this project.
Funding sources for this project are as follows; TOV $460, Eagle County $200,000, CDOT $740,000
"f This analysis will be included as part of the analysis of West Vail Interchange options. The cost of this work is included in the $75,000.
TRANSPORTATION 1996 Actions (continued) Responsibility Time Budpet ImpactlFundinq
t Conduct rate analysis for parking structures Rose, Grafel, McLaurin complete
' Cantinue to participate in rail abandonment coalition Rose, Grafel, McLaurin, Foley On going
' Continue to participate in the Regional Transportation Authority Foley, McLaurin, Grafel, Rose On going $115,000
' Complete loading and delivery study Hall, McLaunn, Grafel, Moorhead $30,000
* Continue to implement Holiday Management Plan Grafel, Rose, McLaurin 12196 NA
' Traffic Code modifications (speed limits) Hall, Moorhead 8l96 NA
1997 Actions Responsibility Time Budpet ImuactlFundina
` Construct West Vail Interchange McLaurin, Grafel, Hall 6198 $5,500,000""'
" Replace soc buses Grafel, Rose, Scholl 12f97 $1,250,000'""'
' Complete WestVail bike path Forrest, Hall, Oppenheimer 10/97 $325,000 (RETT)
' Construct Vail Valley Drnre (Hansen Ranch - TRC) Grafel, Hall
" Lionsridge Street Project Hall 11197 $2,300,000
1998 Actions Responsibility Time Budpet ImaactlFundina
' Reconstruct Vail Valley Drive (Golden Peak to Sunburst) Hall, Grafel, McLaurin 10197 $2,500,000
1999 Actions Responsibility Time Bud et Im actlFundin
East Bridge Road Reconstruction Grafel, Hall 10199 $2,500,000
2000 Actions Responsibility Time Budaet ImaactlFundinu
" Reconstruct Meadow Drive (East Vail) Grafel, Hall 11/00 $2,200,000
2001 Actions Responsibility Time Budaet ImaactlFundinq
' Reconstruct Glen Lyon Streets Grafel, Hall 11l01 $1,500,000
The cost of item is to be measured in terms of lost revenues. The specific cost will be a function of what actions are implemented. For example, con6nuing the free 6-9 program will have one cost, w i e
eliminating charges after 4:00 pm will have another.
This is the es6mated cost prior ta construction design. This project cannot be constructed in 1997 with funding assistance from CDOT, FHWA or other fun ing pa ners.
`++µa+This includes federal funding of $1,000,000 and $250,000 from the TOV
~ i .
11
Ih
TowN oF v~
LOCAL HOUSING
THE GOAL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL IS TO FACILITATE THE PROVISION A RANGE OF HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES WHICH WILL PROVIDE LOCALS AN
OPPORTUNITY TO LIVE IN VAIL. THE TOWN BELIEVES LOCAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES SHOULD INCLUDE OWNER-OCCUPIED DEED
RESTRICTED UNITS, RENTAL UNITS AND UNITS FOR USE BY SEASONAL EMPLOYEES. THE TOWN OF VAIL RECOGNIZES THAT LOCAL HOUSING IS
IMPORTANT TO MAINTAINING OUR SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IS CRITICAL IN SUSTAINING THE VIABILITY OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY.
Strate ies
a. Maintain the existing rental housing base in Vail.
b.' Facilitate the development of new seasonal housing.
c. Facilitate the construction of new rental housing in Vail.
d. Update and revise existing housing regulations as necessary.
e. Continue to utilize and enforce existing employee housing regulations
f. Develop partnerships to help implement the Town's housing goals and strategies.
g. Facilitate the development of new owner occupied units in the Town of Vail.
h. Use the TOV land development regulations to help achieve the Town's goals.
1996 Actions Resaonsibilitv Time Budpet ImaactlFundinq
" Execute agreement with USFS for local housing pilot project Knudtsen, McLaurin 12196 NA
" Oversee the construction and sale of the Vail Commons units. Knudtsen, McLaurin, Moorhead 3197 NA
" Plan, and designed Red Sandstone site. (With Water District) Knudtsen, McLaurin 2/96 $625,000'
" Plan, and design seasonal units at the Public Works site Knudtsen, Grafel, Hervert 9197
" Identify and commit to additional sites for local housing McLaurin, Moorhead, Knudtsen on going NA
" Determine the appropriate use of the Berry Creek properly Town Council 12196 NA
.
The TOV will fund the construction of these units from the Housing Fund. When the units are sold this fund will be reimbursed.
9121196
. .
LOCAL HOUSING
1996 Actions Responsibility Time Budpet ImaactlFundinq
' Pursue genera6ng funds for housing through sale of select LOAA parcels Connelly, Forest, Knudtsen 12196 NA
" Participate in Eagle County Housing Task Force Knudtsen on going NA
" Review GRFA regulations Mollica
1997 Actions Responsibility Time Budqet ImaactlFundinp
' Complete construction of Vail Commons Units Knudtsen, McLaurin 6J97 NA
' Construct Seasonal Housing at Public Works Knudtsen, Grafel, Hervert 9l97 $2,000,000"
* Plan and design redevelopment of Arosa A Frame Knudisen 6/97
1998 Actions Responsibility Time Budqet ImpacUFundinu
" Redevelop Arosa A Frame Knudtsen, Mclaurin 6/98
` Plan, design and program housing at Manager's lots Knudtsen, McLaurin 9198
' Plan, design and program housing at Old Town Shop Knudtsen, McLaurin 9/98
1999 Actions Responsibility Time Budpet ImaactlFundinp
* Construct housing at Manager's lots Knudtsen, McLaurin g/gg
'Construct housing at Old Town Shop Knudtsen, McLaurin g/gg
This amount is currently unfunded. It is an6cipated this project would be a tax credit project and the capital for this project would come from a private developer.
9121196
4FA
TOWNINFRASTRUCTURE
THE GOAL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL IS TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY TO
MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR RESIDENTS AND TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF THE EXPERIENCE FOR OUR GUESTS.
Strate ies
a. Plan, prioritize and fund infrastructure necessary to maintain and enhance the quality of life and the quality of experience in the community.
b. Prepare a 10 year capital budget which prioritizes the TOV capital needs.
c. Identify and construct capital improvements necessary to enhance the 1999 Ski Championships.
d. Commit to and fund a systematic street reconstruction program.
e. Identify additional funding sources to help fund major capital projects.
1996 Actions Resaonsibilitv Time Budpet ImaactlFundinq
' Plan and select preferred McLaurin, Hall, Grafel, Silverthorn 11J 96 $75,000'
alternative for West Vail Interchange
' Construct public works shops Phase I Grafel, Hervert, McLaurin 12/96 $2,500,000
* Design Seibert Circle Improvements Oppenheimer, Hall, AIPP 4/97 (design)
' Recanstruct Vail Valley Drive (Hansen Ranch to GP) Hall, Grafel, McLaurin 11/96 $300,000
* Construct Pulis Bridge Hall, CDOT complete $130,000
* Construct Library chute pedestrian improvements Hall, Oppenheimer, McLaurin 11J96 $450,000
' Construct Bridge Street drainage improvements Hall, Weber complete $35,000
' ConstructVista Bahn Drainage Project Hall, Weber complete $125,000
.
$75,000 will fund the technical analysis and public participation element necessary to select a preferred alternative. Once the Council has selected an alternative the construction design and preparation of contract
documents will cost approbmately $150,000. The cost of the actual construction will be a function of the selected afternative. To date $300,000 has been allocated from CDOT. We will be pursuing addi6onal funding for
the construction of this project.
I
\
INFRASTRUCTURE
1996 Actions (continued) Resuonsibilitv Time Budget ImpactlFundino
' Plan, design and renovate TRC Grafel, Rose, McLaurin 11/96 $1,050,000
* Construct North Frontage Road improvements Hall 11l96 $500,000
' Complete the Dowd Junction Bike Path project Hall 11196 $1,000,000
* Complete Golf Course Street Project Hall, Marfinez complete $450,000
* Bald Mountain Rd/ Glen Lyon Seal Project Hall complete $60,000
` Marriott Curb & sidewalk replacement Hall 11/96 $50,000
1997 Actions Resaonsibilitv Time Budget ImaactlFundinn
' Construct WestVail Interchange McLaurin, Grafel, Hall 6198 $5,500,000"
' Construct improvements at Seibert Circle Oppenheimer, Hall, AIPP 10197 $450,000
` Construct Vail Valley Drive (Hansen Ranch - TRC) Grafel, Hall 9171?
' Westhaven, W. Forest Rd Overlay Hall 8/97 $225,000
' Lionsridge Street Project Hall 11197 $2,300,000
` Reconstruct Slifer Plaza Grafel, Hall 10197
` Reconstruct Checkpoint Charlie Plaza Grafel, Hall 10/97
` Public Works Shop Upgrade Phase II Grafel, Hervert 10/97 $600,000
1998 Actions Responsibilitv Time Budget ImaactlFundinp
* Reconstruct Vail Valley Drive (Golden Peak to Sunburst) Hall, Grafel, McLaurin 10/97 $2,500,000
1999 Actions Resaonsibilitv Time Budget ImaactlFundina
" Reconstruct Children's Foundation Pavers McLaurin, Grafel 10/99
' East Bridge Road Reconstruction Grafel, Hall 10l99 $2,500,000
2000 Actions Responsibilitv Time Budget ImuacUFundinq
* Lionshead Redevelopment Council, McLaurin Connelly, Grafel 10/2001
' Reconstruct Meadow Drive (East Vail) Grafel, Hall 11/00 $2,200,000
2001 Actions Resoonsibilitv Time Budget ImaactlFundinq
' Reconstruct Glen Lyon Streets Grafel, Hall 11101 $1,500,000
;iThis is the estimated cost prior to construction design. This project cannot be constructed in 1997 with funding assitance from CDOT, FHWA or other funding partners.
ECONOMIC STABILITY
THE GOAL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, THROUGH A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS TO HAVE A STRONG, VIABLE LOCAL ECONOMY.
THE LOCAL ECONOMY SHOULD HAVE A SOLID ECONOMIC BASE AND A REASONABLE RATE OF GROWTH. THE TOWN WILL STRIVE TO
STRENGTHEN VAIL'S ECONOMY WHILE MAINTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL AND DESIGN EXCELLENCE.
Strate ies
a Enhance economic development opportunities.
b. Strengthen relationship with the business community.
c. Encourage responsible commercial redevelopment in Vail Village, Lionshead and West Vail.
d. Increase the number of "live" beds in the Vail Village and Lionshead.
e. Work with the private sector to improve the quality of the existing bed base,
f Work with the private sector to increase taxable retail sales.
g Improve customer focus and service. ,
h. Encourage special events and create festive retail opportunities.
Actions Resaonsibilitv - Time Budpet ImpactlFundinp
' Analyze retail trends and opportunities (eg ULI) TOVNA Task Force, LH & W Merchants
McLaurin, Connelly Silverthorn
* Streamline development review for Connelly
commercial redevelopment,
` Conduct study on Village loading & delivery. Grafel, Hall, Connelly, Sheely $30, 000
' Review special event regulations to determine how to Brandmeyer, McCutchen, Special Events on going NA
ease application process for these events Commission Waterton, Sheely
' Complete West Vail Design Guidelines Ruther, Hall
' Complete Ford Park Master Plan Brantlmeyer., Ruther, Oppenhiemer 10l96
, VRD, WF, Alpine Gardens
.
ECONOMIC STABILITY
Actions Resaonsibilitv Time Budaet ImpactlFundinq
* Explore alternative parking management strategies Rose, Grafel, McLaurin 9196
* Develop a plan for the Lionshead redevelopment and 7awn Council, McLaurin, Connelly 1197
develap partnerships to implement said plan Moorehead, Thompson, VA LH Merchants & properiy owners
* Undertake and complete the Community Strategic Pian TOVNA Task Force, McLaurin, Connelly, Silverthorn 12196 $200,000"
* Complete Development {mprovement Review Process Connelly, Duran, Hall 7196 NA
* Continue to develop non peak strategies TOVNA Task Force on going
~The cost of this item is to be measured in terms of lost revenues. The specfic cost wiN be a function what action(s) are taken. Far example, continuing the free 6-9 program will have one cost, while eliminating
charges after 4:00 pm will have another.
ti This is total estimated cost of this effort. It is expected the total TOV porGon not exceed $50,000. The balance is expected to come from the private sector. The TOV portion is to be reallocated from the capital
budget currenUy allocated for a land use plan update.
4VAIL
COMMUNITY COLLABORATION TOWNTHE GOAL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL IS TO EXERCISE COUNCIL LEADERSH{P TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY DiALOGUE AND FOSTER A MORE
C04LABORATIVE COMMUNITY.
Strate ies
a. Foster a more collaborative community
b. Improve community dialogue and participation in the creation of programs and policies that enhance our community's quality of life,
c. Build trust and credibility within the community through promotion of responsible and responsive decision-making by 70V staff and council.
d. Identify (conflicting) needs, values and concerns of the community audience segments,
e. Articulate and clarify key community goals and issues to audience segments.
f. Create an environment of informed community consent on major public decisions
g. Strengthen the Town organization.
Actions Resaonsibilitv Time Budaet ImaacUFundin4
* Identify, organize and create a dialogue with community Silverthorn, McLaurin, Council on going NA
contact in each neighborhood
* Increase presence in community through organized appearances Council, McLaurin, Silverthorn on going NA
presentations to Village & Lionshead Merchants, Rotary, etc
' Hast regular MayodCouncil walkabout through neighborhoods & businesses Council, McLaurin on going NA
' Host town wide community breakfasts on a quarterly basis Council, Silverthorn, McLaurin
' Complete the Vail Tomorrow effort Council, Silverthorn, Connelly, McLaurin 2197 $225,000'
a
" This effort is a public private partnership. It is anticipated that the TOV contribution will be $100,000. This amount was originally budgeted to update the Land Use Plan. However it was felt that Vail Tomorrow would
more readily achieve the Council of fostering collaboration and building trust.
9121196
~
>
GRFA PROJECT
Proposed Public Involvement Process
9/24/96
Step 1: Analysis of Alternatives * Researched alternative methods to GRFA
Aug & Sept * Surveyed 8 other resort communities (Beaver Creek, Deer
Valley, Whistler, Keystone, Breckenridge, Park City,
Steamboat, & Aspen).
Step 2: Public Involvement * Synthesize survey and research into a 2 page summary of
Weeks of Oct 14 8z 21 st pros/cons of each alternative method.
* Conduct two roundtable forums to obtain input on pros
and cons of each alternative and identify additional
alternatives.
Step 3: Review Alternatives * PEC and Town Council review alternatives
November 5 to determine if any alternatives should be
eliminated.
* Staff further refines analysis of pros and cons and
develops a recommendation.
Step 4: Approval Process * PEC and Towm Council review recommendation and
November/December choose an alternative or no action.
* Ordinance prepared and presented to PEC and Council.
Printed by Anne Wright 9/26/96 8:34am
From: Anne Wright
To: Towii Cbuncil, Bob, Pam & Suzanne
, Subject: '
TOV/Breckenridge Town Council
meeting
='=NOTE===....-s-=.==- 9/26/96=-8:34am==
Gary Martinez, Town Manager of
Sreckenridge called to say that the
date of 10/29 is fine. The
Breckenridge TC would come here about
5:30 p.m. and meet for approximately
one and one-half hours. He also said
they would be planning a dinner
af[erwards. He would like to talk to
Sob to follow-up on this.
Page: 1
u
~y
,OWN OF VAIL
75 SouZh Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 19, 1996
Contact: Susan Boyd, 479-2194
Assistant Library Director
SELECTED CDROM'S NOW INCLUDED IN
TOWN OF VAIL LIBRARY CHECK-OUT ROTATION
(Vail)--The Town of Vail Library has now added selected CDROM's to its list of items
that may be borrowed. With the proper equipment on your home, school or office
computer, CDROM's provide an added multimedia dimension to standard computer
software. The library is the first in the region to include a portion of its CDROM
collection in its circulation. The decision, said Susan Boyd, assistant library director, is
a result of customer interest. "This is something our users have been asking for over
the last year," she said. "It's the kind of technology many people in our community have
incorporated into their leisure, educational and business pursuits."
The town library will begin immediately by circulating approximately 30 CDROM's.
Present topics include travel, games, education, sports and nature. The materials,
worth $500, were donated by individual supporters. If the materials are well-received,
Boyd said the library will consider increasing the size of its CDROM circulation over the
winter.
Vail library patrons have been exposed to CDROM's since the late 1980s when a
magazine index CDROM was installed. Since then, the CDROM materials have
(more)
RECYCLED PAPER
r
Town of Vaii Library/Add 1
increased to over 30 items including Colorado statutes, Morningstar Mutual Funds and
children's multimedia, such as Toy Story. Most of the CDROM's installed in the library
have restrictive copyright laws and cannot be circulated, Boyd said.
The new software materials approved for circulation are compatible with most
CDROM drives on home computers, Boyd said. Operating and copyright instructions
are included with each software program.
CDROM's have become popular with many groups of library users because they add
the dimensions of sound and motion, Boyd said. For instance, nature lovers enjoy
hearing the sounds and watching the flight of North American birds on a CDROM, while
young children and their parents find it intriguing to watch an animated version of the
ABC's, or a CDROM on the subject of creative writing may entice an otherwise reluctant
student, she said.
To check-out a CDROM, patrons simply need to present their Vail Public Library card
to the circulation desk. The user then has three weeks to enjoy the new software. Due
to the limited size of the collection, CDROM check-outs will be limited to one per patron.
The service is free.
For more information, contact the Vail library information staff at 479-2187.
# # #
.
~y
TOWN OF VAIL -
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
MEDIA ADVISORY
September 25, 1996
Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information Office
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL HIGHLIGHTS FOR SEPTEMBER 24
Work Session Briefs
Council members present: Armour, Foley, Jewett, Johnston`, Kurz, Navas
(*Johnston excused himself mid-way through the meeting)
--Loading and Delivery
An experimental approach for delivery in the Village Core will continue for another 30
days while town officials work to refine a recommendation presented to the Council
yesterday. The recommendation--allowing loading and delivery in outlying loading
zones from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., with interior delivery anywhere along Gore Creek Drive
during a three hour window in the morning (starting after 7 a.m. and ending by
11 a.m.)--was met with some concerns by the numerous delivery drivers who attended
the meeting. While drivers were generally supportive of the recommendation to park
anywhere along Gore Creek Drive for interior deliveries, they said the three hour
window wasn't long enough to do their work. Representatives from the mail delivery
services, for example, said they needed time to service their customers (the
businesses), most of whom aren't there until 10 a.m. Others expressed concern for the
mix of trucks and ski-bound pedestrians during peak season. Some of the drivers
suggested mandating a"lock out" period during the peak pedestrian period similar to a
program at Denver International Airport. There, drivers are allowed to make deliveries
on foot, but are not allowed to move their trucks until the lock out period is over.
Another driver suggested a gate system with strict enforcement that would honor the
sensitivities of noise and engine exhaust issues of the core. Representing the
surrounding residential community in the core, Jim Lamont of the East Village
Homeowner's Association criticized the recommendation for continuing to allow delivery
trucks in the outlying areas. He said the residents have been saddled with the trucks
for too long and demanded the problems be handled without the bounftries of
Commercial Core I. He then went on to describe potential parking opportunities, most
of them in private lots, to service each of the buildings in the core. Lamont also called
for a long-term solution to the problem and criticized the town for not including
concerns of the residential constituency in the current recommendation. Councilman
Paul Johnston and his wife Sally, operators of the Christiania Lodge, said they, too,
were tired of being saddled with the burden of delivery trucks lined up along Hanson
RECYCLEDPAPER
TOV Council Highlights/Add 1
Ranch Road. Paul Johnston suggested opening up both Gore Creek Drive and Bridge
Street for interior deliveries to spread the burden to those who benefit from the
deliveries. Maybe then, Johnston said, the businesses will see fit to work toward a
long term solution. The solution, said Town Manager Bob McLaurin may be the
construction of a central delivery system, which could cost as much as $10 million.
That's the easy part, he said. The difficulty will be determining how the project would
be funded and how it would operate. The reaction from Council members to the
discussion incfuded: a suggestion by Michael Jewett to create a schedule for
defiveries with assigned parking spots; a comment by Kevin Foley to understand
stafifing levels of the community safety officers in the Police Department for improved
enforcement; a comment by Ludwig Kurz who expressed disappointment in the lack of
representation at the meeting by the merchant, restaurant, and lodging community and
a suggestion that truckers, too, will need to be prepared to compromise on certain
issues; a suggestion from Paul Johnston that the Vail Transportation Center should be
incorporated as a distribution center; remarks by Sybill Navas that the short-term
solution should be more creative; a suggestion by Bob Armour that vehicles be
categorized by size and dealt with accordingly; and written comments from Rob Ford
who suggested limiting the delivery by refrigerated trucks to three days a week. In
addition, Navas said she agreed with Paul Johnston that delivery trucks should not be
placed in the outlying residential areas during the 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. period. In the
meantime, the following plan was developed to be continued on an experimental basis:
parking in outlying areas allowed from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., while interior parking anywhere
along Gore Creek Drive will be permitted from 7 a.m. ta noon. For more information,
please contact Police Chief Greg Morrison at 479-2209.
--1997 Contribution Requests
The Council reviewed contribution requests from 28 organizations and agreed to
- forward the following funding recommendations for the 1997 proposed budget:
I r I:
Colorado Ski Museum-Ski Hall of Fame, corporate table sponsorship, $600
Economic:
Bravo! Colorado, $27,500
The Chamber of Commerce, $6,000
Colorado Avalanche Information Center, $200
United States Demonstration Skiing Association, declined
United States Ski Team, declined
Vail Associates Cloud seeding, $8,000
Vail Jazz Foundation, declined
Vail Mountain Rescue Group, $2,000
Vai! Symposium, declined (but sent on to the Commission on Special Events &
Activities)
Vai! Valley Arts Council, declined
Vail Valley Exchange, $6,300
Vail Valley Foundation, $72,500
(More)
a
!
TOV Council Highlights/Add 2
Educational:
Learning Tree, declined
Meet the Wilderness, declined
Health and Human Services:
Colorado West Mental Health Center, 4 blue parking passes and 60 debits
Eagle Valley Family Assistance Fund, declined
Echo Ranch, declined
Food Resource Center, declined
Healthy Babies & Families, declined
Minturn Volunteer Firefighters Assn., 60 parking debit cards and in-kind bus
service for July 4 fireworks (contingent on fireworks being held another night
than Vail's).
Northwest Colorado Legal Services Project, declined
Recreation:
Ski Club Vail, 4 days at Dobson Arena
Snowboard Outreach Society, declined
Vail Junior Hockey Association, declined
Vail Recreation Gymnastics Program, declined
Vail/Beaver Creek Buddy Werner League, declined
Contractual Arran emen :
Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau, $418,700
Channel 5(franchise fee 40% contribution), $44,084
Avon-Beaver Creek Transit, $115,000
Vail Valley Foundation (World Alpine Ski Championships), $112,000
Contributions from Real Estate Transfer Tax:
Vail Alpine Gardens, $10,000 pledge
In using the town's four critical strategies as a criteria for reviewing the 1997 proposals,
the town saw significantly fewer requests from community organizations this year -
(nearly half), although those requests were $114,500 more than the $815,000 cap
allocated in the proposed budget. The town's critical strategies are: 1) effective and
efficient municipal services; 2) responsible municipal leadership; 3) environment; and
4) sustained economic climate. Next steps in the 1997 budget process include
preparation of departmental budgets by Oct. 4. For more information, contact
Christine Anderson in the Finance Department at 479-2119.
(More)
TOV Council Highlights/Add 3
--Information Update
Public Works Director Larry Grafel gave an update on the Serrano's construction. The
project is on schedule, he said. Concrete foundation slabs have been poured, with
crews now working on framing-up the exterior for the next concrete pour. Steel work wiU begin the week of Oct. 7. He said the contractor has asked for permission to work
on Saturdays and Sundays through Nov. 20 to maintain the schedule. Grafel said he's
prepared to authorize the weekend work, with slightly reduced hours on Sunday.
Council members have asked the town to assist the contractor in minimizing
construction impacts on traffic, residents and guests.
Assistant Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer said a discussion on changing the
municipal election date in the Town Charter will be scheduled at the Oct. 8 work
session. The topic was mentioned by Bob Armour at last week's work session during a
discussion on procedural issues. Currently, the Charter calls for municipal elections to
occur the first Tuesday after the third Monday in November, odd-numbered years,
whereas county, state and federal elections are held the first Tuesday in November,
annually. Armour said it might make more sense for Vail's election date to now be
consistent with the others. Any change in the Charter would require an election.
--Council Reports
Kevin Foley reported the Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority has hired a
director. Jim Shrum, who previously ran the transit system in Scottsdale, Arizona,
begins his new position Oct. 14. Foley also said the Trails Committee met on Monday
for a site visit of the Dowd Junction recreational path. He said the Committee is
interested in designating a portion of .the trails fund to help pay for construction.
Bob Armour said he attended a TOV-VA Task Force meeting in which projects were
prioritized for the upcoming ski season. The group will work on increasing
communications in working with the business community in promoting the Vail Valley
Club card and the new recreational activities that will be opening at Eagle's Nest atop
Vail Mountain.
(More) .
~
,
~
.
TOV Council Highlights/Add 4
--Other
Saying she wanted to follow up on Paul Johnston's inspirational "watering the seeds"
comment at last week's meeting, Sybill Navas said she had two causes she wanted to
bring forth. The first, is a connection of the streamwalk from Ford Park to Donovan
Park. The second issue, she said, is to pursue locals' housing at the water district site
near the Glen Lyon Office Building. Navas also said she was interested in seeing
progress at the "ruins" site at Cascade Village.
Prompted by the pending merger of area ski resorts, Bob Armour said he and Bob
McLaurin met with municipal officials in Breckenridge to begin discussions of common
interests. Vail council members expressed interest in having a dialogue with the entire
Breckenridge Council on Oct. 29
Bob Armour shared his enthusiasm for the recent Oktoberfest and complemented the
staff of the Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau for coordinating the activities in
Vail Village and Lionshead.
UPCOMING DISCUSSION TOPICS
October 1 Work Session
Site Visit, Vail Pointe
Amplified Sound Update
October 1 Evening Meeting
Vail Gateway Building Special Development District Amendment
Town Council Selection of Final Alternatives for West Vail Interchange
Appeal of PEC Decision re: Vail Pointe
October 8 Work Session
Vail Commons Interior Package Tour
Discussion of Changing the Regular Municipal Election Date
October 15 Work Session
Joint Presentation by Vail Village & Lionshead Merchants Associations
October 15 Evening Meeting
Lionshead Redevelopment
Review of Ford Park Conceptual Master Plan
# # #
~
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 25, 1996 .
Contact: Rob LeVine, 476-2471
Coordinating Team Member
VAIL TOMORROW NEXT STEPS ARE PRIORITIZATION AND BRAINSTORMING
AT SECOND COMMUNITY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 1& 2
(Vail)--The Vail Tomorrow project will soon move into phase four of its seven-step
community action planning process when participants gather for the "Describe Vail
Tomorrow" Community Conference on Nov. 1 and 2. There, decisions and actions will
be based on 11 goal areas established at the first community-wide gathering Sept. 7.
To maximize participation, the Describe Vail Tomorrow Conference will be held during
two sessions beginning the evening of Friday, Nov. 1, and continuing through Saturday
morning, Nov. 2. Anyone who cares about or is impacted by Vail is encouraged to sign-
up for all or a portion of the conference activities. Both sessions will be held at Manor
Vail and discounted child care will be provided nearby.
Rob LeVine, a volunteer who's helping oversee logistics of the Vail Tomorrow
process, says the decisions made at the next conference not only have the potential to
directly impact people's lives, but will be dependent upon those who participate. "If
you've been wanting to share your specific ideas about how to make Vail a better place,
this is your chance," he said. "There are 26 organizations and agencies throughout this
region who have endorsed this effort and are ready to strongly consider the actions
recommended by the Vail Tomorrow process. Because of that, we have a tremendous
opportunity to work together as a community to make things happen in a positive way,"
he said.
Activities at the November conference will continue the work established by
(more)
P.O. Box 1019 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • 970-479-2451 • http://vail.net/Vail-Tomorrow
,
Add 1/Vail Tomorrow
participants at the first community conference earlier this month. There, 130 people
worked together to develop consensus on 11 goals. They are:
• World Class Resort
We recognize and agree that our natural environment, and in particular, our ski
mountain, is critical in making Vail a world class resort and forms the foundation for the
community that has grown up around the resort. Our goal is to preserve that critical
foundation and to enhance it through diversification of overall amenities and
improvement of guest and support services.
• Natural & Built Environment
We will continue to preserve and protect the ambiance, charm, warmth and natural
beauty of Vail as a mountain community, focusing on both the natural and built
environments and the integration of the two.
• Growth Management
We will continue to direct growth to maintain our status as a world class resort and to
achieve our other community goals.
• Safety & Security
We will not sacrifice the safety and security that we enjoy in our community today.
• Building Community
In the early days of Vail, members of the community were involved in creating the resort
and community and there was a high degree of acceptance, respect and interaction.
Today, there is a desire to recapture that sense of togetherness and community. We
agree that we will work to generate more opportunities, occasions and physical locations
for community interaction and to promote broader participation in our community life. We
will reach out to our extended community, embrace our part-time residents, enhance
. communication and strengthen neighborhoods. We will increase social responsibility
and cooperation, including more public-private partnerships.
• Economic Diversity
In supporting our commitment to building community, we will increase our
sensitivity to and respect for the essential needs and dignity of our workforce, including
seasonal employees. We will expand the diversity of the economic base.
Economic diversification will promote social and cultural diversity by creating more and
varied employment opportunities and more "rungs on the ladder" professional growth
opportunities, job satisfaction, year-round financial security and long-term housing
opportunities.
• Affordable Housing
We will provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of a diverse
community.
• Cultural & Educational Opportunities
We will develop and enhance cultural and intellectual opportunities for all ages.
(more)
r
~
Add 2Nail Tomorrow
• Youth
We will improve education, recreation and devetopment programs, and foster a sense
of inclusion, for our children and teenagers.
• Family
We will maintain and enhance our family focus in Vail, particularly in the areas of quality
affordable health care, child care, public education and family-oriented activities.
• Regional Cooperation
We will improve and increase regional collaboration, specifically on planning and
transportation issues.
In preparation for the November conference, research is now underway to document
quantified or objective aspects of the focus areas and to compare those areas with
three other resort communities: Aspen, Whistler and Sanibel, Florida. Conference
participants will then review the research, and work together to decide which of the
goals are most important to pursue first. They also will brainstorm actions to achieve
those goals.
"It's extremely important for the various points of view to be represented during these
discussions," LeVine said. "This is where the rubber meets the road in mapping out our
course of action for Vail's future.
Vail Tomorrow is an open, honest and fair process and we want to let people know
they're welcome to participate," he continued. "But we also want to make it clear that
we won't be going back to revisit decisions that have already been decided through the
consensus of the participants."
LeVine noted that more than 1,200 people, including full-time residents, part-time
residents, business owners, commuters and others, have already used their voices in
the Vail Tomorrow process through involvement in community roundtable discussions,
responses to surveys or through attendance at the first community conference. "The
(more)
r
F
Add 3/Vail Tomorrow
level of interest and enthusiasm for this process has been overwhelming," LeVine said.
"We need to carry the momentum into tangible actions and that means each of us
taking personal responsibility for our collective future."
Following the November conference, organizations and individuals with a role to play
in implementing the actions will work alongside community volunteers to determine
which actions are best for Vail. Their recommendations will be reported back to the
community at a final conference in the spring, and the actions will be underway.
For more information about the Describe Vail Tomorrow Conference on Nov. 1
and 2, or to sign-up to attend, please call (970) 479-2451.
Endorsement Update
Here's a list of the 26 organizations endorsing the Vail Tomorrow project, to date:
Chamber of Commerce Vail Valley Restaurant Association
Colorado West Mental Health Vail Alpine Garden Foundation
Eagle County Commissioners Vail Associates, Inc.
Kiwanis Vail Symposium
Lionshead Merchants Assn. Vail Daily
Snowboard Outreach Society Vail Mountain School
Town of Minturn Council Vail Valley Theatre Company
Town of Vail Council, Vail Religious Foundation
PEC and DRB Vail Valley Foundation
U.S. Forest Service Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau
Holy Cross Ranger District Vail Village Merchants Association Board
Partnership for Environmental Vail Recreation District
Programs, Inc. (PEEP) Eagle River Water and Sanitation District
Eagle County School Board
# # #
Town of Vail
Sales Tax Estfmation Worksheet
9/24/96
% Change s: Change
1996 auaget mom trom
Month IMs 1996 1997 isW ,sw iaqo 1991 1902 f= igaa rgm eudger esurnre vane,rce rsas eudeer
Janua 881,304 890,585 1,063,196 1,126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,855,364 1,805,707 1,894,597 1,891,738 1,933,323 41,585 2.04% 220%
Februa 918,154 946,5521,135,786 1,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,828,766 1,814,495 1,816,107 1,813,365 1,990,912 177,547 9.63% 9.790%
March 1,187,520 1,316,652 1,378,782 1,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 1,988,090 2,250,656 2,139,298 2,136,070 2,238,409 102,339 4.63% 4.79%
A ri! 531,668 430,877 425,961 550,205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 864,303 794,668 791,092 789,890 963,716 173,826 21.82% 22.01%
May 162,912 244,987 245,518 170,567 215,548 236,359 250,809 268,000 257,248 287,315 324,681 324,179 316,017 (8162) -2.67% -2.52%
June 280,828 361,627 331,581 329,039 393,470 448,227 468,948 468,598 475,161 548,820 590,685 589,783 589,941 158 -0.13% 0.03%
Jul 447,815 479,507 479,201 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 811,538 892,830 893,483 892,126 958,246 66,120 7.25% 7.41%
Au ust 386,985 512,513 536,904 575,887 668,119 678,071 761,992 767,257 825,954 891,566 867,125 865,808 980,450 114,642 13.07% 13.24%
i:•'r•::~:~i::;;::2~:~:2t:~::~ ~:::::~::~:Y•3:~:~:: r:;:~:~:~;t:::::.'':::::;•':;:~`:;`~:~~;:;;:;~:_;::2:~:::<t::~;: ~~:£.:~::~:~;`:~;:~i:~::::::~;::::~::~:a:~i:~;:~i:~ -
TOTAL 4,797,186 5,183,300 5,596,929 6,108,683 7,460,874 7,854,616 8,337,939 8,405,985 8,906,424 9,286,057 9,317,068 9,302,959 9,971,014 668,055 7.02% 7.18%
Se tember 340,102 374,060 442,402 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 645,902 645,195
October 209,282 237,504 273,951 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367,578 400,525 408,405 461,791 460,170
November 229,083 376,657 386,270 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 497,907 553,681 594,491 611,147 608,123
December 905,955 1,167,280 1,245,612 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,775 1,846,223 1,974,553 1,992,855 1,994,540 1,990,566
.......................:::::.:.:~,.;~.;~..y;y.y.;y.;•,.y:::..
,
~:::>::::;:::::%:~:;::::::::::r:::s::s:::: =:z=:: ~:<:#:<::<:::::_>:>:>:<g:<:>::::»::s:i:;>;>.
~;::•r:•::.;•::•:::::::-~...;:~~:•c•:.;.: ...-::::~:::....,-:'::'r:.s:.:x.::•;:::.;:;..~
. . .
, . . .
:r::i::i;#;:~:~:~:::~ii::~:~s:~>::~::~:~~%•'S~~>'~::~:~::~:~:::•'•.::::>:i:::: r•:::::::::
. ~
; .
;:;f.>2:r:~:~:~:.'•:~::~::::?:::y;:~:<::~<:;;:::$3:::;:;:::~~~:~:;~:`:'~2~::;::;::::':~:.`.~i::':::~;:%;:?;::;~:::;:=::: ~:::t;';:
, ::::::.~~::..:':.'.'::':%::y:.;.:::::::::::: :.r::.:::•:%•::~:5:~::~::'<.5:::4:::::'<~::::;::::%~:::::~i:=:~Sii:;~`:ti~:~:i:~>:::~-3.~i;:s:~':~:`;i:'<:;:•':•x.5::.
: ,.;•::•r:;;:as:,.....................::::::.~::.~::::.~::::::._::: ::.::::c:::::::::::::::::::~:;::.:;~ .
. . ,...,::,:x:: :•::.:x:•;r~:::.
: r.::: :•._::~:::.>xt~:~;::~::~r•;~::~:,~
y: :::•::::::::.y::._::.;?:•»::+-:::•>:.;•........... . •~:~.::i•:::::r.-: . . . .
..y,.::::::::.~._
. ,
~:ii:Y+-.' ...~......r{y::: . v: vy,-~;x::: w: v:::
'•:•>r.•;:•.'•':•x•:;:•>::•<::,.y;.;.:.
•.'•;~•;x;'•:
•;••~•!,•:.;;::;:.:::;;>'.;::;'-~::?b:::t~::.:xcs:.:.::; :•:;::::.rxc.:rrv: w:•~:r•:;::::•:;;r,::r;;r;:r; ~ ................~::;x:::::::•: ~•.•:x>:::::~;:::ri:Y,::rr:d::>:;5;;::•;L::;=::;;r
::rv::::ix~:: .:i:::::. . . . .
'•:'~~:i::~':3:t~"
Total 6,481,608 7,338,801 7,945,164 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,603,647 12,395,718 13,007,013 13,030,448 13,007,013 9,971,014 668,055
r
. . .Va11 ASSUGIat(',5,1iic.
. .
A
Seplembei 4, 1996 •
~
TM TM
Dick Duian Cliiet; Vail I~ire l~e}~arl~nent
42 W. Meadow ,Drive
~ Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Dick:
On behalf of Vail Associates, 1 woulcl like to send our thanks and praise to the Vail Fire
Department for your efforts during the recent Piney River Ranch van accident.
i
Incidenls lilce tliese are never easy lu work with, but the expertise and professionalism
shown by the members of the Vail Fire Department helped inake a very difficult
operation the success that it was.
Sincerely,
Making Vacation VAIL ASSOCIATES, ]NC.
• Dreams Come True!
Andrew P. ll y
President
~
1999 WO0.LD AI.PINE
$I(I CqANPI0N5111P5
YAIIIIEAVEICAfEK
o ~ o, A o 0 PO Box 7• Vail, Colorado. 81658. phone 970 476 5601 . fax 970 845 5728 L~
Printed by Pam Brandmeyer 9/19/96 5:06pm
---------------------------------------?+-~'~P.e~ ~.Lrv~ dl,i~?t `~fi~~ t~t,
From: Pam Brandmeyer ~ ~/1•~~~ ~,~/M~y{~`1 ~
To : Everyone Gzoup
Subject: STEVE THOMPSON'S DAD.
===NOTE====------=====9/19/96==5:03pm== ~
...died at 3:00 A.M. this morning.
He will be interred saturday in ,
Colorado 5prings, but there will be a ~ ~memorial service at 11:00 A.M. Monday
(9/23/96) in Denver.
5T. JAMES PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ~
3601 WEST BELLEVIEW AVENUE
LITTLETON 794-6851
In lieu of flowers, contributions to
the American Cancer Society can be
mailed to the following address:
IN MEMORY OF RICHARD THOMPSON
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
2255 SOUTH ONEIDA
DENVER, CO 80224
(303)758-2030
If you wish to send a card to Steve,
Laurie, Tyler, and Mollie:
P.O. BOX 630
AVON, CO 81620
If you wish to send a card to Steve's
mom :
BEVERLX THOMPSON
2311 SOUTH LEYDEN
DENVER, CO 80222
FYI.
Page: 1
LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY AGENDA Present Absent
SEPTEMBER 11, 1996 Dave Chapin Don White
10:00 A.M. Connie Knight
Kathy Vieth
Mary Zarba
1. Swear in new member, Kathy Vieth.
Kathy Vieth was sworn in to fill an unexpired term terminating June, 1997.
2. Consideration of the Authority of a Modification of Premise for a Hotel and Restaurant
License with Extended Hours for Rocky Mountain Restaurant Management, Inc., d/b/a
Michael's II, at the location of 12 South Frontage Road, Vail Colorado.
a) Expand the Michael's II premise to include the atrium area of the Gateway to host
a private party on Friday, September 20, 1996.
b) Modify the expanded Michael's II premise back to its original state on Saturday,
September 21, 1996.
Oktoberfest Event Manager, Bill Brice and Michael's II President, T. Michael Ditch were
present.
APPROVED, 4-0.
3. Consideration of the Authority of recent renewals:
Flexible Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Montauk Seafood Grill;
Slalom, Inc., d/b/a Nick's; , Up the Creek Bar & Grill;
G T S, Inc., d/b/a Vail Conoco Service;
Mountain Liquors, Inc., d/b/a Peregrine Wines & Spirits;
Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., d/b/a The Chalet Bar;
Vail Oasis Corp., d/b/a Uptown Grill;
JWT 1987 Vaii Limited Partnership, d/b/a Vail Hotel 8 Athletic Club;
JA Chelsea, Inc., d/b/a Club Chelsea;
The Customer Company, d/b/a Food and Deli;
L-O Vail, Inc., d/b/a Heart Rate Cafe;
Grand Prix, Inc., d/b/a Grand Prix Room; and
Gaffinkel Enterprise, Ltd., d/b/a Garfinkel's
The above-listed renewals were approved, 4-0, with the exception of Garfinkel's which
was removed from the list for discussion.
4. Any other matters the Authority wishes to discuss. _
In relation to a renewal application for Garfinkel's, the Authroity was informed of
recent complaints against the establishment from neighbors pertaining to the conduct
of the establishment and the license holder permitting undue noise, profanity,
rowdiness or other disturbances.
Reg. 47-110.1 of the Colorado Liquor and Beer Codes states that whenever a written
complaint shall be filed with a licensing authority, charging any /icensee with a
violation of the Colorado Liquor Code, the licensing aufhority shall determine by
investigation the probable truth of such charges. The Vail P.D. is in the process of
conducting an investigation.
LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY AGENDA
September 11, 1996
Page Two
Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead explained that pursuant to a recent change in the
liquor code it was appropriate to not renew a liquor license for "good cause", and
that one of the issues of concern pursuant to the recent complaints against the
establishment was whether or not that establishment was operating in a manner
that serves or fulfills the needs of the neighborhood or community.
David Chapin then suggested that based on the complaints received against
Garfinkel's, the matter should be scheduled for a hearing before the Local
Licensing Authority at its next regular meeting.
APPROVED, 4-0.
5. Next scheduled meeting October 9, 1996.
ADJOURNED 10:30 A.M.
TOWN OF VA{L
Local Lic nsing Authority
Holly L. McCutcheon
Secretary to the Authority
Printed by Anne Wright 9/26/96 4:09pm
From: Linda Wolz
To: EVERYONE GROUP
Subject: JOE RUSSELL'S FATHER
-
===NOTE====______=====9/26/96==3:47pm~=
As you know from an earlier message,
Joe Russell's father passed away on
Tues. The funeral arrangements are as
follows: .
Mass will be held at 3:00 P.M. on
Friday, Sept. 27 with a full color
guard and bag pipes at
Holy Ghost Church
19th & California in Denver
Reception immediately following at:
Police Protective Association
2105 Decatur St. (near the Bronco
Denver stadium)
He will be buried in Wambely, SD.
In lieu of flowers the family asks that
donations be made to:
Police Protective Association
2105 Decatur
Denver, CO 80211
If you wish to send a card, Joe and
Cheryl's address is:
P. 0. Box 1031
601 Washington Street
Eagle, CO 81631
Page: 1
~
RFrPvFn SEP 2 7 f996X~~
VAIL VALLEY v
~
TOUR(SM & CONVENTION BUREAU
100 East Meadow Drive • Vail, Colorado 81657
V
September 25, 1996
Mr. Bob McLaurin
Town Manager •
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Bob:
For the second consecutive year, Oktoberfest Vail has been a great success for the VVTCB, Vail
businesses, local community members and visitors. We are very happy that Oktoberfest has now
proven itself to be a sigruficant September event with the potential to grow into one of Vail's
annual, cornerstone festivals.
Besides the fact that the weather has been in our favor two years in a row, we owe much of our
success to the Town of Vail and many of its departments, management and staff. Like most of
our events, Oktoberfest Vail '96 required a great amount of coordination on the part of the town.
And, like all the events we have produced over the past year and a half, this was no exception
to the positive and professional manner in which everyone from the Town of Vail helped to
support our efforts.
From the liquor review board, to the public works department, police department, town clerk,
community development department, transportation department and the administrative staff,
everyone did their best to assure a safe, successful and well organized event. Working with the
Town of Vail is truly one of the most enjoyable aspects of my job. Saying "thank you" is also
something that I enjoy taking the time to do, especially when it is so well deserved.
To you, and all who contr:buted time resources to Oktoberfest Vail '96, the WTCB recognizes
and appreciates your support and thanks you for being a integral part of our success!
Sincerely,
~
William J. Brice
Director of Special Events and Communications
,10-ai Reservations 1-800-525-3875 Gr-oup Sales (970) 479 2360 Business Office (970) 476-1000
Groul) Sales 1-800-775-8245 FAX (970) 479-2364 FAX (970) 476-6008