Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-02-11 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session !/A9L TOWIV COUNCIL, WORK SESSI~~ TUESDAV, FEBRUARY 11, 1997 2:00 P.M. AT TOV COfJNCIL CHA?IIABERS - AGE(VDA NO'TE: T6mes of 6$ems are approxurnate, subject to change, and canno$ be Pelied uporu go determ6ne at wtuag t8me Council wBEA consider an itern. 1. 10 Year Anniversary of Georgie IVlanzanares. (5 mins.) 2. PEC/DRB Review. (15 mins.) 3. Town of Vail/U.S. Forest Service exchange agreement for the land Russell Forrest exchange. (30 mins.) ACTIORI REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Reviewr the draft exchange agreement for the TOV/USFS land exchange. BACKGROUiVD RATIONALE: On February 4th, the Vail Town Council approved the final appraisal for the land exchange. In addition, The Town Council passed a motion which identified the properties that would be included in the final exchange based on the approved values. Council must now review the draft exchange agreement. If the agreement is acceptable to the Council, a resolution will be presented to Council on February 18th authorizing the Town Nlanager to sign the exchange agreement. An ordinance will also be presented to Council that would enable the Town to convey the TOV lands in the exchange to the U.S. Forest Service. STAFF RECOMMEPVDATIONS: Direct staff to prepare a resolution and ordinance to execute the exchange agreement. 4. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Planning Process. (5 mins.) Susan Connelly Tom Moorhead ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Authorize Town Manager to execute (1) Agreement for Professional Services between Town of Vail and Design Workshop for Master Planning Services; and (2) letter agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Associates regarding the Master Planning collaboration, including cost sharing. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On November 5, 1996, the Town Council approved 4he Problem/Opportunity Statement, the Lionshead Policy Objectives, the Master Plan Scope of Work, a community participation plan, a process schedule, process ground rules, a proposed collaboration with Vail Associates, and a master planning process budget and requested to review the consulting services agreement with Design Workshop, Inc. and the cost sharing agreement uvith Vail Associates prior to authorizing the Town Manager ±o execute those agreements. Copies of the agreements, as vvell as the November 5, 1996 memorandum to Council from Susan Connelly, are enclosed for your review. STAFF RECOM11iiEiVDATIOIV: Authorize the Town Manager to execute the two agreements. 5• Compliance review of Serrano's construction. (15 mins.) Greg Hall 6. Discuss cancellation of March 18th work session and evening meetings and reset regular evening meeting for March 25th. (5 mins.) 7. Information Update. (10 mins.) 8. Council Reports. (10 mins.) 9. Other. (10 mins.) 10 Adjournment - 3:45 p.m. NOTE UPCOMING ANEETING START T9MES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL T01NN COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2/18/97, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. Ifd TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWIIdG VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2/25197, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2/18I97, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. I I I I I I I Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. C:WGENDA.WS 2 ~ . Abcnda lasl rcviscd 2/I 1/97 10 tim PLANNING AND ENVIROIVf1AENT'A,L COilAY1flISSION Monday, February 10, 1997 FIiVAL AGENDA Project Orientation / LUNCH - Community Development Department 11:30 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT DRB MEMBERS PRESENT DRB MEMBERS ABSENT Greg Moffet Galen Aasland Ted Hingst Michael Arnet Greg Amsden Brent Alm Clark Brittain Henry Pratt Gene Uselton Diane Golden John Schofield Site Visits : 1:95 pm 1. Brooks - 1502 Buffehr Creek Road 2. Swiss Chalet - 62 East Meadow Drive 3. Austria Haus - 242 East Meadow Drive Driver: George m~/, • p oo y`o' NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearinq - Tovun Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for aworksession to develop a preferred alternative for Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA). (2:00 - 3:00 p.m.) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Russ Forrest VVOFiECSESSBON - NO VOTE 2. A request for a vvorksession with the Design Review Board for the establishment of Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce Planner: George Ruther lIUORGCSESSION - N0 VOTE 1 i\gcnda last rcviscd 2/1 U97 10 am 3. A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage, located at 1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant: Art and Elaine Kelton Planner: Dirk Mason MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Gene Uselton VOTE: 4-2 (Henry Pratt and Greg Moffet opposed) APPROVED WITH NO CONDITIONS 4. A request for a worksession to discuss variances from Sections 18.22.060 (Setbacks), 18.22.140 (Parking), 18.04.130 (Common Area) and 18.22.020 (Percentage of Accessory Uses) to allow for an entry addition at the Swiss Chafet, located at 62 East Meadow Drive/Part of Lot K, Block 5-E, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Henry Pratt Planner: Lauren Waterton WORKSESSION - NO VOTE 5. A request for a major amendment to SDD # 29 to modify the platted building envelopes and create 1 primary/secondary lot, located at 1502 Buffehr Creek Rd./Tracts A-1 & A-2, Parcel 2, Lions Ridge 2nd Filing. Applicant: Harold Brooks Planner: Lauren Waterton MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: Gene Uselton VOTE: 7-0 RECOIUrMEND APPROVAL TO THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WITH THREE CONDITIONS (#2 AMENDED) - 1. That a minor subdivision, eliminating the common lot line between Tracts A-1 and A-2, be approved by the PEC. 2. That the existing viewing deck (not approved by the Town) be removed by-ApH4-4; 1-997 J,une.1; 1997 3. That the lot line discrepency between the final plat and the most current survey be resolved to the Town's satisfaction. 6. A request to amend the Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan and adopt the Gerald R. Ford Park Management Plan. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Larry Grafel, Pam Brandmeyer, Todd Oppenheimer. Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 24, 1997 7. A request for a conditional use permit to allow a Fractional Fee Club to be located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 24,1997 2 , ngcnda lasl rcviscd 2/I U97 10 am 8. A request for an interior remodel to the secondary unit utilizing the 250 ordinance, located at 778 Potato Patch Dr./Lot 18, Biock 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Fred Bartlit Planner: Tammie Williamson STAFF APPFiOVED 9. A request for a residential addition for an expansion of the living room, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd Filing. Applicant: Nate Accardo Planner: Lauren Waterton 1NITHDRAWN FFiOM AGEND,4 10. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a Type II EHU, located at 392 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 4, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing. Applicant: Howard Koenig Planner: Tammie Williamson W~THDFtAWft1 FR061fl AGENDA 11. Information Update: 12. Approval of January 27, 1997 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Community Development Department 3 ngcmL•i lasl roviscd 2l6(97 R aiii PLANNING AND ENVIRONnAENTAL COnAIIflISSION Monday, February 10, 1997 AGENDA Probect Orientation / LUNCH - Community Development Department 11:30 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits : 1:15 pm 1. Brooks - 1502 Buffehr Creek Road 2. Swiss Chalet - 62 East Meadow Drive 3. Austria Haus -,242 East Meadow Drive Driver: George ~ NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearinq -'fovvn Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a dvorksession to develop a preferred alternative for Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA). (2:00 - 3:00 p.an.) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Russ Forrest 2. A request for a dvorksession with the Design Review Board for the establishment of Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce Planner: George Ruther 3. A request for a front setback variance to allow for a new garage, located at 1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant: Art and Elaine Kelton ~ Planner: Dirk Mason 4. A request for a wor6csession to discuss variances from Sections 18.22.060 (Setbacks), 18.22.140 (Parking), 18.04.130 (Common Area) and 18.22.020 (Percentage of Accessory Uses) to allow for an entry addition at the Swiss Chalet, Iocated at 62 East Meadow Drive/Part of Lot K, Block 5-E, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Henry Pratt Planner: Lauren Waterton Agcncia la,t rcviscd 2/6/97 8 am 5. A request for a major amendment to SDD # 29 to modify the platted building envelopes and create 1 primary/secondary lot, located at 1502 Buffehr Creek Rd./Tracts A-1 & A-2, Parcel 2, Lions Ridge 2nd Filing. Applicant: Harold Brooks Planner; Lauren Waterton 6. A request to amend the Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan and adopt the Gerald R. Ford Park Management Plan. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Larry Grafel, Pam Brandmeyer, Todd Oppenheimer. Planner: George Ruther 7. A request for a conditional use permit to allow a Fractionai Fee Club to be located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 24, 1997 8. A request for atn interior remodel to the secondary unit utilizing the 250 ordinance, located at 778 Potato Patch Dr./Lot 18, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Fred Bartlit Planner: Tammie Williamson STAFF APPROVED 9. A request for a residential addition for an expansion of the living room, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd Filing. Applicant: Nate Accardo Planner: Lauren Waterton WITHDRAWN FROM AGENDA 10. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a Type II EHU, located at 392 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 4, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing. Applicant: Howard Koenig Planner: Tammie Williamson WtTHDRAWN FROM AGENDA 11. Information Update: 12. Approval of January 27, 1997 minutes. f The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Community Development Department Published February 7, 1997 in the Vail Trail. AgcnLla last rcviscd 2/6/97 R .im DESI`lIIla RLLi tl IIEO'Y IIDO!'9RD FI1VtiL f\'lIIElVDA Wednesday, February 5, 1997 3:00 P.M. 6'RO.?G:C'V O9tflEN'VAT?ON / NO LUNCH - Community Development Department 2:00 MEM[iERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Michacl Arnctt Brcnt Alm Clark Brittain Tcd Hingst John Schoficld (PEC rcp.) 5ITE iJOSI'VS - 2:20 1. Bresnahan - 4532 Strcamsidc Circlc 2. Pctcrs - 4193 Sprucc Way Drivcr: Dominic 0'UBOJIC HEARQNG - 'VOWN C0UNC9L ClfAMBEIZS 3.00 1. DiscuSSion of tcrms of officcrs. MOTION: Hingst SECOND: Brittain VOTE: 5-0 E7C'VEIVD vN'V?L AP9t9L 2,1997 2. Pctcrs - Ncw residcncc Laurcn 4193 Spruce Way/Lot 12, Blocl< 9, Bighorn 3rd Addition Applicant: Stcvcn Pctcrs, rcprescntcd by Stcvc Isom MOTION: Hingst SECOND: Schoficld VOTE: 5-0 TABL~D U1+ITllL IE'EBRUAR1' 19,1997 3. Bresnahan - Garage addition Lauren 4532 Streamside Circle East/Lot 15, 8ighorn 4th Addition Applicant: Lillian & Bill Bresnahan MOTION: Alm SECOND: Hingst VOTE: 5-0 r1~PPBgOVED WI'd'lH[ ll CONDI"B'9ON - l. Add 3 Aspens, 2" - 3" caliper, on the west elevation. 1 4. Wcst Vail Roundabout - Lilil(JtiCapC pl111 Gcorgc Applicant: Town of Vail MOTiON: Alm SCCOND: Britttllll VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS - 1. Usc darkcr charcoal color for concrctc apron. 2. Any cxposcd concrctc on thc briclgc must bc tcxturizcci and colorcd. 5. Information Updatc: • Joint PEC/DRI3 mecting on Fcbruary 10, 1997 0 Elcction oF 1997 officcrs. Namc Tcrm Expirc Tcrms Scrvcci Michacl Arnctt 03/31/97 12/92-03/97 (2) Brcnt Alm 03/31l97 02/95-03/97 (1) Ciark arittain 03/31 /9R 03/96-02/98 (1) Tcd Hingst 03/31/99 03/96-02/98 (1) 1997 PEC Rcnrescntativc John Schoficld Jan. - Mar. Gcnc Usclton Apr.- .lun. Galcn Aasland Jul. - Scpt. TBD Oct. - Dcc, Staff A1212rovals Savoy Villas - Rcapproval of DRB 4/95 approva) Dominic 1230 Lionsridgc Loop/Simba Run, Savoy Villas Applicant: LarryBcnway, Isom & ASSOCiatcs Lia Zncimcr Subdivision, Lot 6- Changcs to approvcd plans Gcorgc Lot C, Lia Zncimer Subdivision Applicant: Brcnt Alm, Alm Architects, Inc. The aprlications and inlin-mation about the proposals are available Ior public inspection during regular office hours in the project rlanner's ollice, located at the Town of Vail Conu»unity Developmcnt Depailment, 75 South Frontage Roa<l. Sign languagc intci7prctation availablc upon rcqucst with 24 hour notilicalion. Plcasc call 479-2114 voicc or 479-2356 TDD for inliirmation. ~2 tv3 0-11• il V*4u.V3 , LAW OFFICES DUNN, ABPLANALP Sc CHRISTEiVSEN, P.C. A PROFESSIONALCORPORATION ` JOHN W. DUNN THE VAIC BANK BUILDiNG TELEPHONE: ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP, JR. SUITE 300 (970) 476-0300 ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN OIANE L. HERMAN 108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST TELECOPIER: R. C. STEPHENSON VAIL, COLORADO 81657 (970)476-4765 KAREN M. DUNN SPECIAL COUNSEL: ' CER7IFIED tEGAL ASSIS7ANT JERRY W. HANNAH 11 February 1997 Town Council Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail CO 81657 Re: Rockledge Land Adjustment Exchange Members of the Council: As a number of the members of the Council are aware, this Firm represents several of the homeowners on Rockledge Road who are interested in the proposed exchange of land by which existing and . long-established practical access to their residences, and the existence of a Town-maintained street known as upper Rockledge Road, would be legally recognized. Our clients who are interested property owners, and on whose behalf this letter is written, include the following: Owner(s) Property Mary Noel Lamont Lot 2, Block 7 Vail Village First Filing Various Trusts for the Lot 3-A, Block 7 Benefit of the Hunt Family Vail Village First Filing Clinton Josey, Jr. and Lot 3-B, Block 7 Betty Josey Vail Village First Filing Vernon Taylor . Lots 4 and 7, Block 7 Vail Village First Filing Trust for the Benefit of Lot 8A, Block 7 Catherine Edborg and others Vail Village First Filing Initially, our clients wish to express their appreciation to the Town of Vail and its personnel for their efforts in resolving an issue which has been a continuing challenge, first for Vail Associates, and then for the Town of Vail and our clients, for more than thirty years. The focus on the resolution af the problem of town and public roads being located on Forest Service lands has been welcomed. The discussion which occurred on the 4th of February, particularly at the evening meeting of the Council, however, indicated a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the problem which is confronting the Town and the property owners, and a possible expectation on the part of the Town which our clients and we have been attempting to dispel. With reference to the probZem which exists in the Rockledge area, there was some discussion in the recent meeting to the effect that the principal purpose of the property acquisition was to correct encroachments and title problems of the property owners. With the exception of a deck at the west end of the proposed parcel (not the property of any of our clients), our clients are aware of no encroachments onto Forest Service property. Neither does any property have a title problem. There is a practical problem with access, which relates to the fact that the town road, known as Rockledge Road, and the privately maintained former public road (orig.inally part of Mill Creek Road) east of the traffic circle at the end of Rockledge Road, which originally served as access to Vail Mountain, are located on Forest Service property and were never authorized or Iegitimized by the Town of Vail (which originally recognized and maintained both as public roads) or Vail Associates (which originally established and/or used both roadways). It is this practical problem, whzch is shared by the Town of Vail and the property owners, which is to be resolved by the exchange process. The second issue relates to the contribution which the Town may expect from the property owners. When the property owners were working with the Forest Service several years ago, it appeared that cost of acquiring the required narrow tract which was required to correct the road problem would cost less than $500,000, and a number of property owners were willing to participate in that cost, if they acquired the property adjacent to their platted lots. Our clients acquiesced in the Town's request that they leave the negotiation of the exchange to the Town of Vail, and that decision was premised upon the understanding that the final cost of the Rockledge parcel would be in that range. The cost of the Rockledge parcel has now increased to $2,400,000, and there seems to have been the suggestion that the Town of Vail may expect the property owners to defray the greater part of this amount. As we have advised the Town of Vail in previous letters, this is not a realistic expectation. While our clients (who do not represent all affected property owners) are probably willing to participate at the level anticipated several years ago, the suggestion that they participate at a level several times that which was previously discussed is not realistic, and the Town of Vail should be aware of that fact before it enters into an agreement with the Forest Service with any such expectation. Our clients remain supportive of the exchange effort and are appreciative of the efforts of the Town of Vail to resolve this O long-existing problem. However, they do not wish the Town to be placed in a position where it enters into the aqreement based upon expectations of contribution which are not realistic, and which our clients have attempted both in the past and at this time to correct. It is in that spirit that this letter is provided to the Town Council. If you have any questions regarding our clients' position on this matter, you may either contact me, or you may contact our clients directly. Very ly you , / D N, AB A ALP IST 5EN, C • Arthur. A. Abplanalp, Jr. ~ xc: Ms. Mary Noel Lamont Mr. Bill Lamont Mr. and Mrs. Clint Josey Mr. A1 Allred Mr. Vernon Taylor Mrs. Kathleen Edborg MEMORANDUM [ ] 0/25/96] DATE: November 5, ] 996 TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department RE: Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Bac9cge-ouaod: On Junc 4, 1996, Davc Corbin of Vail Associates Real Estatc Group (VAREG) presentcd to the Town Council a proposal for a joint study of redevelopment opportunities in Lionshead. The proposal reflectcd both VAREG's desire to redevelop its own properties in Lionshead and a recognition of the Town of Vail's keen interest in revitalization of Lionshead. Since June 4, a tcam composed of Town of Vail staff, rcpresentatives of VAREG, and professional consultants in the areas of engineering, planning and design has met regularly to analyze the problems and opportunities presented in Lionshead, policy objectives and a scope of work for a master planning effort to address both public and private properties, a community participation process, givens, and a process budget and schedule. Each of those items (except the master plan budget) was tested with approximately 60 members of the community in six focus groups held in late September. The information and recommendations contained in this memo rcflccts thc input rcccived in thosc focus groups. Coantents mff This Memo: A. Prob9em/ Opportaanaty Stafement 'B. ?.eouushead Polecy Objectives C. Laouns6neac9 Master Plan Scope of Wor9c . D. Commaan'sty PartecApatson Plan E. Master Plan Process SchedaaBe F. Process GroundranVes G. Prmposed Collaboratioan ev0t9n Vau9 Assocaates H. IVIfaster PDaasaaung Process Budoet ll. SQaffff Recommendatfions lExBuubuts throangh E A. Tovveu Couuucel's Cr6tacal 3Qrategues ffor 1996-98 B. Va6O "Q'omorrow GoaB Statecnents C. 1L'uons9nead Master Plann6ng Process graph6c D. PQn,ysaea9 and Desagn Pe-ogram Matrux A. Problem/Opportunitv Statement: Lionshead lacks the charm, character, appeal and vibrancy expected of a world-class resort. lt lacks a sense of arrival and sense of place. Pedestrian flow through the mall can.be confusing and disconnected. The architecture lacks a unique identity or reference to Vail's historica] antecedents or its alpine environment. Many of the buildings are physically aging and functionally under-utilized, resulting in negative impacts to property values, private profits, and public revenues. Potcntial hospitality, retail and recreational uses, and community amenities arc unmet or unrealizcd. It would bc short-sighted to ignore these conditions and do nothing. The opportunity exists for the public and private sectors to act collaboratively to renew and revitalize this important component of our community. B. Lionshead Poliey Objectives: Given the problems and the opportunitics presented by the Lionshead arca and the framework provided by the Council's adopted Critical Strategies for 1996-1998 (see Exhibit A attached hereto), as wcll as the Vail Tomorrow Goal Areas articulated by the community through the Vail Tomorrow process to date (see Exhibit B attached hereto), staff recommcnds adoption of the following policy objectives to serve as the foundation for the . master planning process and future decision making regarding Lionshead. OBJECTIVE 1. RENEWAL EiND REDEVELOPMENT Lionshcad can and should be rcncwed and redeveloped to become a warmer, morc vibrant environment for guests and residents. Lionshead needs an appealing and coherent identity, a sense of piace, a personality, a purposc, and an improved aesthctic character. OBJECTIVE 2. V[TALITY AND AMENITIES We must seize the opportunity to enhance guest experience and community interaction through expanded and additional activities and amenities such as pcrforming arts venues, conference facilities, ice rinks, streetscape, parks and other recreational improvements. OBJECTIVE 3. STRONGER ECONOMIC BASE THROUGH INCREASED "LIVE BEDS" In order to enhancc the vitality and viability of Vail, renewal and redevelopment in Lionshead must promote improved occupancy rates (i.c., "live beds" or "warm pillows") and fhe creation of additional bed base through new lodging products. OBJECTIVE 4. IMPROVED ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The flow of pedestrian, vehicular, bicycle and mass transit traffic must be improved within and through Lionshead. _ OBJECTIVE 5. IMPROVED INFRASTRUCTURE • The infrastructurc of Lionshcad, including strcets, walkways, transportation systems, parking, utilities, loading and delivcry systems, snow removal and storage, and other public and private scrvices must be upgraded to meet the capacities and service standards required to support redevelopment and revitalization cfforts and to meet the expectations of our guests and residents. Page; 2 OB.U}ECTllVlE 6. C?tlEATIVE FRNANCING F0R ENHAliiCED PllSllVATIE PROF?TS A1~~ PUBIt,IC REVENgJES Redevelopment in Lionshead must bc undertaken in a financially creative, but feasibie, manner so that adequate capital may bc raised from all possible sources to fund desired privatc and public improvcments. C. V.aomsheadl Master P9aun Scope off Work: Thc Mastcr Plan scopc of work will involvc tive stages, each with its own community involvement process, products and decision points. See , Exhibit C, attached hereto. Stage Il. Data GatVnereng anc0 Sute Analyses (Defning Opportunatoes and Coeastraints): The purpose of Stage 1 is to gain a detailed understanding of the existing conditions in Lionshead. A number of elements will be mapped and analyzed, including topography, vegetation, utilties, traffice and circulation, building mass and height, regulatory parameters, census data for building uses and populations, and solar access. This mapped data will form the basis for dcfining opportunities and constraints in Lionshead. Stage 2. Program Devesmpment (Braanstoraru L6Wash Lest"): The purpose of Stage 2 is to define the needs and wants of the principal stakeholders in Lionshead, thc Town of Vail, Vail Associates, and the community at large. During this stage, all participants will have an opportunity to dcfine thcir "wish lists" for possiblc inclusion in thc mastcr plan program to be approved by the Town Council. 5tage 3. AnaVyze A?teu-naguves and SeBect Preferred Algee-native: The purpose of Stage 3 is to test the approved program clemcnts against the Stage 1 site, opportunities and constraints analysis. A serics of alternatives for Lionshead will be developed, presented, and ciiscussed, leading with community input to Town Council selection of a preferred plan. Planning/design critcria and financial feasibility will be major aspects of the selection process. Stage 4. Develop and Adopt Master Poaen and Desegn Guide9ines: Thc N[aster Plan Devclopment stage has two purposes. First, a final plan will be defined which. will constitute the physical design paramcters and goals for revitalization and redevelopmcnt of Lionshead. Second, a set of design guidelines will be developed and approved to guide the architecture and strectscape of individual development opportunitics. Stage 5. Appu-ovaV of Omp?ementat6on Act6ons (Adopt Requia-ed Code 19'?odaffacatuons): Thc purpose of the final stage of the master planning process is to write and adopt such code modifications as may bc recommcnded to achieve the Master Plan's objcctives. Pagc 3 D. Community Particiaation Plan: Community participation is highly desirable at all stages of the master planning process for two reasons: onc, in ordcr to crcate a better understanding of the various factors and interests involved in master planning and redevelopment, and two, to offer additional creative input. Public input to date has been in the forrn of six focus groups composed of stakeholders and interested citizens who reacted to drafts of the proposed problems/opportunity statement, policy obicctives, master planning process and process goundrules. 7'he versions of those items contained herein reflect the community input received on the drafts. Community involvemcnt in Stage 1, Defining Opportunities and Constrainsts, will take two forms: review of information about existing conditions and input regarding additional factors or aspects to be considered. We anticipate that a matrix would be created to consolidate all information on existing conditions and proposals gathered in this stage on one (large!) handy sheet so that all information is scen in the context of the policy objectives underlying the master planning proccss, cxisting conditions in Lionshead, and proposals for redevelopment already on the tablc. A draft of the matrix is attached as Exhibit D. We propose two walking tours and two public workshops to engage the community in Stage 1. In addition, we will provide survey response forms for those who are unable to attend either workshop. In Stage 2, Brainstorming "Wish List", we will use three public workshops and continue to use a survey response form to gencrate ideas frum stakeholders, community members and others interested in brainstorming ideas for possiblc inclusion in thc mastcr plan program. Thc Internet will be onc of several survey responsc form vchicles to communicate with part-time resident property owncrs. Public participation also will occur as recommendations arc brought to the Planning and Environmental Commission and thc Vail Town Council. In Stage 3, Development of Alternatives and Sclection of Prcferred Altcrnative, two public workshops are planncd, as well as survey response forms, to gather inforrnation on the alternatives presented. Public participation also will occur as rccommcndations are forwardcd to the PEC and Town Council. Community participation in Stage 4, Master Plan and Design Guidelines Development, will be in the form of worksessions and public hcarings beforc the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC), Design Review Board (DRB) and Town Council. In Stage 5, Adoptionof Required Code Modifications, community participation will occur as proposed code revisions are presented, discussed, and acted upon by the PEC, DRB and Town Council in worksessions and public hcarings. E. Master Plan Proeess Schedule: The Town of Vail needs to balance its responsibility to process specific development proposals, such as that presentcd by VAREG, with its responsibility Page 4 to maximize positive benefits to the community as a whole. The proposed approach to achieving that necessary balance is thc master planning process, which will create a framework for decision= making on develomcnt proposals for all private and public properties in Lionshead. Given that there are specific redevelopment proposals pending, time is of thc essencc in thc Lionshead Master Planning Proccss. The proposed schedule for the master planning process is ambitious. It will require considerable dedication on the part of Town of Vail staff (Community Development, Public Works, Fire and . Town Attorney) as well as the expertise of professional consultants in a variety of areas. For reasons of rime urgency and budget efficiency, staff proposes to continue to utilize the consultants who already are on board and familiar with thc issues, sites, process and existing Town of Vail regulations Design Workshop, Inc. (.DW1) pursuant to a Contract for Professional Services between the Town and DWI. F. Process Grouand Raafles: The Town of Vail is committed to open, honest and fair processes that create informed judgment and better decision-making. In order to clarify roles and expectations and ensure that the Lionshead Master Planning Process is undertaken and completed in a responsible way, the following ground rules will apply to the master planning process and will be included in all documcnts and discussed in all meetings regarding Lionshead Master Planning: 1. Thc Master Plan to be developed for all public and private lands in Lionshcad will scrve as the policy framework for all future decision-making on specific development and rcdevclopmcnt proposals in Lionshcad. The Master Plan will be based on the Lionshead Policy Objectives adopted by the Town Council to reflect the community's interests. 2. The Mastcr Plan area will be bounded on the north by I-70, on the east by 1Vliddle Creck (wcst of theVail Valley Medical Centcr), on the south by the Town of Vail boundary (south of Forest Road, and not including single-family lots and on the west by Rcd Sandstonc Crcck (east of thc Glen Lyon Officc Building). 3. Thc Town of Vail (TOV) will work coliaborativcly with Vail Associates (VA) on the master planning process for Lionshead and will involve all other interested citizens and property owners in the master planning process. The master plan ultimatcly recommended may or may not reflect devclopment approaches currently being explored by VA. 4. Proprietary information of any privatc propcrty owner or developer will rcmain private and confidential unlcss it becomes part of a public record. Pagc 5 5. There will be no net loss to the Vail community of either locals' housing or parking spaces (public and private) now existing in Lionshcad. 6. Collaborative public/private redevelopment and financing ventures, including urban renewal authorities and downtown development authorities, will be considered. 7. The intent of redevelopment includcs minimizing short-term construction-related impacts of redcvclopmcnt on cxisting busincsses and residents and increased cooperation , bctween the public and private sectors. 8. The Town Council will have final decision-making authority on the Master Plan, adoption of implementing actions, use of public lands, public improvements, and public financing mechanisms. The Town Council or its authorized boards (e.g., PEC and DRB) will make final decisions on subscquent site-specific dcvelopment proposals consistent with the Master Plan. G. Proposed Collaboration with Vail Associates: The Lionshead Master Planning Process, including funding of the planning effort, is proposed to be a collaborative process between the Town of Vail and Vail Associates. The reasons for the proposed collaboration are several. First, thc Growth Management Agrecment developed and entered into by the Town and VA in 1995 wa5 a commitment to public-private partnership to achieve the missions of both organizations. For the Town of Vail, that vision is to be the prcmiere mountain community and international resort. . Second, VA is the principal landowner in Lionshcad, has reversionary interests in Town-owned lands, and was the catalyst behind the mastcr planning concept because of ats own proposals for rcdcvclopmcnt in LionShcad. Finally, staff believes that a proactive pooling of information, resources and commitment is the most effective approach to achieving the Council's critical strategies and specific objectives for Lionshcad in a timcly, efficicnt, and likciy-to-bc-impicmcntcd manncr. Town collaboration with VA on the master planning will not obstruct participation by the broader community and, in fact, likely will enhance the opportunities for community involvement in the process. VA has embraced the Town's commitment and methods to achieve open, honest and fair processcs that lead to more informed judgment and better decision-making. H. The Master Planning Process Budget: A master planning process of this magnitude and detail requires significant expert, technical and graphical support. The total master planning budget, including necessary professional consultants, computer and mapping expertise, and Page 6 graphics, is estimatcd at approximately $400,000. Analysis of financial feasibility and financing mechanisms would be another approximately $200,000. Thcse sums arc exclusive of other planning costs assumed by private parties. To give somc Council some perspective, this $600,000 figure represents approximately 3% of $200 million of potential devclopment investment on core sites in Lionshead. Pursuant to the proposed collaboration with VA, the Town would pay one-half of the master planning and financial fcasibility costs, or approximately $300,000. Assuming implementation of some or all of the master plan's ultimate recommendations, some or all of the planning costs may be , recovcrable, depending on the financing mechanism utilized. . . 1. Stafff Recommendatuoons: Staff rccommcnds that Council: A. Approve/adopt the following items: 1. The Lionshead Problem/Opportunity Statement, 2. The Lionshead Policy Objectives, 3. ` The Lionshead Master Plan Scopc of Wark, 4. The Community Participation Plan, 5. The Master Planning Process Schedule, 6. The Process Ground Rules, 7. The Proposed Collaboration with Vail Associates, including the cost- sharing, and 8. The Master Planning Process Budget, apa B. Authorizc the Town Manager to execute: 1. A Contract for Profcssional Services between thc Town of Vail and Design Workshop, lnc., and 2. A letter agreement with Vail Associates Rcal Estate Group, Inc. rcgarding - the master plan collaboration, including cost sharing. EXHIBITS ATTACHED A. Town Council's Critical Strategies for 1996-1998 B. Vail Tomorrow Goal Statements C. Lionshead Master Planning Process graphic D. Physical and Design Program Matrix Page 7 EXHIf3IT A 4F' TOYViV COMMUNI'i'Y COLLABORATION CRITICAL STRATEGY EXERCISE COUNCIL LEADERSHIP YO IMPROVE COMMUNITY DIALOGUE AND FOSTER A MORE COLLABORATIVE COMIMUNITY. Obiectives ` a. Foster a more collaborative community b. Improve community dialogue and participation in the creation of programs and policies that enhance our community's quality of life. c. Build trust and credibility within the community through promotion of responsible and responsive decision-making by TOV staff and council. d. Identify (conflicting) needs, values and concerns of the community audience segments. e. Articulate and clarify key community goals and issues to audience segments. f. Create an environment of informed community consent on major public decisions g. Strengthen the Town organization. ; EXHIIIIT A TO 4ML tii'' LOGAL HOIJSING - CRITICAL STF2A7'EGY FACILITATE THE PROVISIOiV OF A R4ftIGE OF FiOIJSi(VG OF'POF2TUiVITIES !!lIHICH WILL PROVIDE L.OCALS AN OPPORTUfVITY TO LB!!E @N !lAIL. '6"HE TOWN BELIEVES LOCAL FIOl1SING OPPORTUNITIES SHOLILD INCLUDE OWNER- OCCUPIED DEED RESTRICTED UNITS, RENTAL UNIT'S AND l1NITS FOR USE BY SEASONAL EMPLOVEES. THE T'OV!!N OF VAIL RECOGNIZES T'FIAT L.OCAL HOUSING IS IMPORTANT TO fVIAINTAINifVG OUR SENSE OF COtV1MUN17Y AND IS CRITICAL IN SUSTAINING TFiE VIABILITI( OF TFiE LOCAL ECONOfViV. Obiectives a. Maintain the existing rental housing base in Vail. b. Facilitate the development of new seasonal housing. c. Facilitate the construction of new rental housing in Vail. d. Update and revise existing housing regulations as necessary. e. Continue to utilize and enforce existing employee housing regulations f. Develop partnerships to help implement the Town's housing goals and strategies. g. Facilitate the development of new owner occupied units in the Town of Vail. h: Use the TOV land development regulations to help achieve the Town's goals. ~ EXHIBIT A 41AIL TOii'A' ' TRANSPORTATION CRITICAL STRATEGY PROVIDE FOR THE SAFE AND EFFICIENT MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AfVD GOODS WITHIN THE TOWN. THE TOWN IS COMMITTED TO A MULTI MODEL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL, AND WITHIN THE REGION. Objectives a. Improve the efficiency of the TOV Transit System. b. Work with the Regional Transportation Authority to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Regional Transportation System. c. Work to provide for the efficient delivery and distribution of goods in Vail Village and Lionshead. d. Provide for the safe movement of bicyclists and pedestrians within the TOV and in the region. e. Maintain a safe and efficient street system in the Town of Vail. Minimize congestion. f. Work with the Rail Coalition to secure the abandoned Southern Pacific railroad right of way. g. Work with Department of Transportation on the I-70 MIS Study. ; EXfIIBIT A TO 4VAIL T-i~' ONFRASTRUCTURE _ CRITICAL S1"RATEGY THE GOAL OF THE T'0VlN OF !lAIL IS TO PROVIDE FOR T'HE CONSTRUCTIOftI AND flflAIRITEN,4NCE OF F'UBLIC INFF2ASTRUCTl1RE NECESSAFtY TO MAIIVTAIN AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR RESIDENT'S AiVD ENHANCE T'FiE QUALITYY OF THE EXPERIENCE FOR OUR Gl1EST'S. Obiectives a. Plan, prioritize and fund infrastructure necessary to maintain and enhance the quality of life and the quality of experience in the community. b. Prepare a 10 year capital budget which prioritizes the TOV capital needs. c. Identify and construct capital improvements necessary to enhance the 1999 Ski Championships. d. Commit to and fund a systematic street reconstruction program. e.. Identify additional funding sources to help fund major capital projects. ; EXHIBIT A TOIi4VAIL ECONOMIC STABILITY - CRITICAL STRATEGY PROMOTE A STRONG, VIABLE LOCAL ECONOMY THROUGH A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR. THE LOCAL ECONOMY SHOULD HAVE A SOLID ECONOMIC BASE AND REASONABLE RATE OF GROWTH. THE TOWN WILL STRIVE TO STRENGTHEN VAIL'S ECONOMY WHILE MAINTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL AND DESIGN EXCELLENCE. Obiectives a. Enhance economic development opportunities b. Strengthen the relationship with the business community. c. Encourage responsible redevelopment in Vail Village, Lionshead and West Vail. d. Increase the number of live beds in the Vail Village and Lionshead. e. Work with the private sector to improve the quality of existing bed base. f. Work with the private sector to increase taxable retail sales. g. Improve customer focus and service. h. Encourage special events and create festive retail opportunities. . e EXHIBIT t3 INHAGINE V,41L TOMORROlIV G0,4L STAT'ENAENTS VVORLD CLASS RESORT We recognize and agree that our naturai environment, and in particular, our ski mountain, is critical in making Vail a world class resort and forms the foundation for the community that has grown up around the resort. Our goal is to preserve that critical foundation and to enhance it through diversification of overall amenities and improvement of guest and support services. NAT'URAL & BUILT ENVIRONMENT We will continue to preserve and protect the ambiance, charm, warmth and natural beauty of Vail as a mountain community, focusing on both the natural and built environments and the integration of the two. GROV1/T'H EViANAGEi1hlENT We will continue to direct growth to maintain our status as a world class resort and to achieve our other community goals. SAFETV & SECURITV We will not sacrifice the safety and security that we enjoy in our community today. BUILDING CONiiViUNITV _ In the early days of Vail, members of the community were involved in creating the resort and community and there was a high degree of acceptance, respect and interaction. Today, there is a desire to recapture that sense of togetherness and community. We agree that we will generate more opportunities, occasions and physical locations for community interaction and to promote broader participation in our community life. We will reach out to our extended community, embrace our part-time residents, enhance communication and strengthen neighborhoods. We will look for increased social responsibility and cooperation, including more public-private partnerships. ECOiVOfiflIC DIVERSITV . In supporting our commitment to building community, we will work to increase our sensitivity to and respect for the essential needs and dignity of our workforce, including seasonal employees. We will work to expand the diversity of the economic base. Economic diversification will promote social and cultural diversity by creating more and varied employment opportunities and more "rungs on the ladder" professional growth opportunities, job satisfaction, year-round financial security and long-term housing opportunities. AFFOFiDABLE F10USING We will work to provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of a diverse community. Ct1LTURAL & EDl9CATlONAL OPPORTUNITIES We will work to develop and enhance cultural and intellectual opportunities for all ages. VOIJTH We will work to improve education, recreation and development programs, and foster a sense of inclusion, for our children and teenagers. FAMILV We will work to maintain and enhance our family focus in Vail, particularly in the areas of quality affordable health care, child care, public education and family-oriented activities. REGIONAL COOPERAT10N 1IVe will work to improve and increase regional collaboration, specifically on planning and transportation issues. I:\HI1iIT c L:RVNy aGffi:250[ _ . t`1 j LIONSH.EAD ~ ~ j . MASTJUR.PLAN.. . ~ J r~J L~... z.l._.._~r' Define Opportunities ~ and constraints e Brainstorm • Jan-Feb'97 ~ U~alking Tours Q cc¦UiSh liS!„ Z) i March-April '91 f Puhlic Worksliups (2) - Kiosk H Pu61ic VYnrkshaps (3) ~ esponse Forms Anal Ze Alternatiues and Wl Kias9c Res~ponse Farms ~ f Internet Response Forms Select Preferred Aiternatiue Puhlic Hea - a - ' ren L 9s (z) M y pugust 91 ~ Public IWarkshops 121 Kiosk Respanse Fnrrns Pu61ic Hearings (2) : . , . . , . Adopt Required . . Code Modifications ----Zt~~-- ~r: , ~r'~' ~ r ; Nouember '91-ongoing ..W.4 Public Hearings [TBD) Deuelop and Adopt Master Plan ~ Design Guidelines Aug-Oct '91 Pu61ic Hearings [2~ )F 7 • ' a...... EYHIBIT D Vail "I'ommorow : Town Council's, Lionshead Yolicy Vail Associates Other Yroposals f'or Wish List 'Goal Areas...: Critical.Strategies Objectives ProposaLs Consideration World (CIaSS :Resort COm1riu11ity. Renewal and Master Plan Collaboration Collaboiration RedeveloPment iVatural and I3uilt Envia-onments Economic Vitality Vitaliry and Amenities Redeveloped Core Site. 1'ertormin- Ans Center Ice Rink lEconornac Diversity Growpb Convention Center Iiqaria*gerrient CuitiflY'al and Stronger Economic Base 71ncreased Live f3ed/ Hotel Educational Through Increased Li~•e Oppoa-tunities Beds $afety aY1d.SCCUY'ity Additional Retail Space g,ocals Housing .Additional Condo's I3uilding Improved Access and ?lew Central Service COrilYriuIHity Circulation Transport~tion Redeveloped Employee Effordable Housin , g ousincy Improved Int'rastructure New Streetscape New Skier Dropoff "I'rolley to link Lionshead ` outh and Vail Village Family ' Regional ~nfrastructure Creative Financing for DDA Enhanced Private Profits Cooperation and Public Revenues 4•11-q7 . . . TO: Vail Commercial Property Owners R E A L E S T A T E FROM: Rod Slifer SUBJECT: Town of Vail Council Meeting - February 11, 1997 DATE: February 7, 1997 Telephone 970 476 2421 These are the points we will address at the TOV Council Meeting on Tuesday, February Facsimile 1 lth, at 7:30 PM during "Public Input". 970 476 2655 * We appreciate the Council hearing our proposal regarding parking. We also Bridge Screec nt applaud the steps they have taken to date. We would like to tell you what we've done Vail Vifinge Off«e since then. We still feel free parking from 3:00 PM until 7:00 AM is something we 230 Bridkr stCret should implement ASAP. vdil colo~ado * We ran a full page ad in the Vail Daily on Sunday explaining the current free 81657 three-hour program. We will also run the same ad in the Vail Trail and Vail Valley Times. We have also mailed to the village merchants a letter asking that they mention the "free parking" that is currently available in their advertising. We also provided them with wording we feel is understandable. * Here is a check for $1,500 to pay for the re-programming of the parking structure. We are serious. * We feel that since the town is already paying $400,000 to study the future of Lionshead, Vail Village deserves financial consideration. The reality is that our free parking program would not be implemented until March which would reduce the $120,000 ($90,000 in Vail and $30,000 in Lionshead). The actual new cost might be closer to $75,000-80,000 or less. * We again want to emphasize the importance of keeping skiers in Vail past 4:00 PM. We desperately need to keep these people here as long as possible. Additionally, it would greatly help the local employees (and employers) who work a second job in Vail Village or Lionshead from having to pay for parking. One of the first things employees ask for is parking. Free parking would build exhuberance and add life to the apres ski, shopping and dining experience. 0 SOTMBY'S i VTfNNA"f10NAL Rl:ALTY * We also recommend a sign program that includes signs at the entrance and exits of both parking structures, the round-about and the East and West Vail exits. Even signs in the village would be appropriate. * Finally, we need a long term service-oriented plan to address parking free parking, valet parking and anything else that would make Vail more accessible. No studies we just need to sit down as partners and work out solutions. One final comment on Seibert Circle art piece. We feel that one day to review the five proposals is not enough. We would suggest leaving the proposed works available for public review for ten days so that people who cannot make the public meeting on March 25th have a chance to give you input. Then you would meet immediately following that time period. TOWN OF VAIL/DESIGN WORKSHOP. INC. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made is entered into on , 1997 by and befinreen the Town .of Vail, a Colorado municipal corporation ("the Town"), and Design Workshop, Inc. ("the ConsultanY'). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Town wishes to hire the professional services of Design Workshop, Inc. to provide planning and design services for the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has prepared a final proposai for the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan that is titled Lionshead into the 21st Century. A Proposal for Plannina and Design Services for a Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan (hereinafter "Lionshead into the 21 st Centurv"); and WHEREAS, that final proposai as submitted is incorporated herein and made a part hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties further mutually agree as follows: 1. Project Description See Exhibit H of Lionshead into the 21 st Centurv. 2. Scope of Services See Exhibit C on pages 5 through 25 of Lionshead into the 21st Centurv. 3. Personnel Consultant has assembled a master plan team working with David Kenyon, Principal, who is the individual responsible for the overall management of this project. The personnel constituting the master plan team are identified on pages 26 through 28 of Lionshead into the 21st Centurv. Consultant agrees that no substitute of personnei shall be made without the prior approval of the Town. The Consultant represents that its personnel engaged in this project are fully qualified and properly trained to pertorm the services related to this Agreement. 4. Time of Performance The services set forth in the scope of service above shall commence on the date of this Agreement and be performed on an ongoing basis for a maximum of twelve (12) months. 5. Compensation The Consultant's total fee shali not exceed the amount of four hundred three thousand two hundred and twenty dollars ($403,220.00) as set forth on page 22, Compensation for Design and Master Planning Services, of Lionshead into the 21st Centurv. This total fee includes all services but does not include direct charges and reimbursable expenses. Reimbursabie expenses are defined as all expenses, taxes, materials and other charges, purchases, but not limited to, travel, photography, telephones and printing expenses incurred by Consultant on behalf of the Town and not specifically delineated in Scope of Work to be performed hereunder by Consultant. Reimbursable expenses shall be billed at ConsultanYs cost plus 10% for handling. Reimbursable expenses are estimated as 12% of the 1 I master plan fee and are not maximum amounts. Invoices will be based on the task/time/budget estimates set forth in page 23 of Lionshead into the 21st Centurv. 6. Payment If there are no contested items in Consultant's invoices, the Town will pay the amounts due as indicated by the statements submitted by Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an itemized statement. If the Town, in its sole discretion, disagrees with any charge in ConsultanYs itemized invoice, the Town will give notice to the Consultant of the Town's disagreement and the parties will work together to resolve the disagreement. Any payment made by the Town shali not constitute a waiver of the right of the Town to require the fulfillment of all terms of this Agreement and the delivery of all services embraced in this Agreement complete and satisfactory to the Town in all details within the budget set forth on page 22 of Lionshead into the 21st Centurv. 7. Reports. Documents The Town has the right to ownership and use of the plans prepared by Consultant under the Copyright Act of 1976, as amended. Drawings and specifications as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of Consultant and the Town, whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. Provided the Town has fully compensated Consultant for all outstanding invoices for services rendered, the Town shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies of drawings and specifications for information and reference in connection with the Town's use and occupancy of the project. Except by agreement in writing with appropriate compensation, the drawings and specifications shall not be used by the Town on another project, or for completion of this project by others, provided Consultant is not in default under this Agreement. 8. Independent Contractor Consultant is an independent contractor, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall constitute or designate Consultant or any of ConsultanYs employees as agents (except as expressly set forth in this Agreement) or employees of the Town. Further, it is agreed that: a) The Town of Vail does not require Consultant to work exclusively for it; b) The Town of Vail, for whom the services are to be pertormed, does not establish a quality standard for the Scope of Services; c) The Town of Vail may supply plans and specifications, but will not oversee the actual work or instruct the Consultant as to how the work will be performed; d) The Town of Vail can terminate the Contract if the Consultant violates the terms of the Contract or fails to produce a result that meets the specifications of the Contract; e) The Town of Vail does not provide training for the Consultant's employees or workers; 2 fl The Town of Vail does not provide tools or benefits to complete the Agreement although materials and equipment may be supplied; g) The Town of Vail does not dictate the time of performance except that a completion schedule and range of work hours may be estabiished; h) Payment for services rendered pursuant to this Contract will be made to the trade or business name of the provider of services rather than to the individual; and I) The Town of Vail does not in any way combine its business operations with those of the Consultant. CONSULTANT IS AN INDEPENDENT COiVTRACTOR IS NOT ENTITLED TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS AND THE CONSULTANT IS OBLIGATED TO PAY FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAX ON ANY MONIES EARNED 9. Insurance Consultant shall obtain and maintain in force for the term of this Agreement the following insurance: A. Comprehensive general liability (including personal injury) in an amount not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per individual and not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence. B. Workman's Compensation and employer liability in accordance with the Workman's Compensation Act of the State of Colorado for employees doing work in Colorado in accordance with this Agreement. C. Automobile liability (including owned, non-owned, and hired) in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per individual and not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence. D. The above coverages shall be obtained from companies acceptable to the Town. Certificates of Insurance evidencing automobile liability coverage shall be furnished to the Town at the time of the signing of this Agreement. The general liability policy shall include the Town as an additional named insured by policy endorsement. 10. No Waiver No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other provision of this Agreement, nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided, nor shall the waiver of any default of the terms of this Agreement be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default. 11. Termination The performance of the work provided for in this Agreement may be terminated at any time in whole or, from time to time, in part by the Town for its convenience. Any such termination shall be 3 affected by delivery to the Consultant of a written notice specifying the date upon which termination becomes effective. This Agreement may also be terminated by Consultant in the event of a material default of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by the Town, provided the Consultant has first provided the Town with written notice of the default and the Town shall have failed to cure the specified default within seven (7) days of receipt of the notice. In the event of termination, Consultant shatl be paid on an hourly billing and expense basis for work satisfactorily completed prior to the date of termination. 12. Jurisdiction. Venue and Attorneys Fees The jurisdiction and venue of any suit or cause of action under this Agreement shall lie in Eagle County, Colorado. If it becomes necessary to bring any cause of action to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be awarded its legal costs including investigation and attorney fees. 13. Point of Contact Any points of contact for both parties and any notice provided for in this Agreement shall be deemed given if mailed to the respective parties at the addresses below: Town of Vail 1309 Vail Valley Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Attn: Robert W. McLaurin ph. 970/479-2105 Design Workshop, Inc. 953 South Frontage Road West Suite 102 Vail, CO 81657 Attn: David Kenyon ph. 970/476-8408 14. Assianment This Agreement is for expert services of the Consultant that may not be assigned without the prior written consent of all parties to this Agreement. 15. Compliance with Law Consultant will not perform any of the services provided specified in this Agreement contrary to any local, state, federal, or county law. 16. Severabilitv Should any section of this Agreement be found to be invalid, all other sections shall remain in full force and effect as though severable from the part invalidated. 17. Discrimination Consultant shall not discriminate against any employer or applicant for employment because of disability, race, color, age, sex, religion, or national origin. 18. Intention of the Parties This Agreement contains the entire intention of the parties and may only be changed by a written document signed by the parties. 4 19. Execution The parties have executed this Agreement on , 1997. TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation By: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager Attest: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk DESIGN WORKSHOP, INC. By: David A. Kenyon, Principal C:\designwk.agt 5 ~ RE CE@VED .lAN 3 1 1997 Tafl Associates Real Estate Group, Inco January 27, 1997 Tom Moorhead Town Attorney Town of Vail Re: ]L'nonsh~ad Ma§ter IPYannnnang Dear Tom: As you know Vail Associates, through Vail Associates Real Estate Group, has agreed to jointly fund the Lionshead Master Planning process. Our commitment to Town Co.uncil was for $300,000; $200,000 as incurred and billed by Design Workshop and their subcontractors and another $100,000 towards a financial feasibility study with Arthur Andersen. I am sure you would like a written memorandum or letter agreement confirming our commitment. We would also like your reciprocal commitment to fund the other $100,000 of the Andersen study. I am including a loose "term sheet" of points which I feel should be included. Please advise me of your thoughts on this matter and whether you would like us to originate a draft or you would like to do so. Developers of Vail, Beaver Creek°Resart Arrowhead°and Very truly, Bachelor Gulch Village" VAIL ASSOCIATES AL ESTATE GROUP, INC. David G. Corbin Vice President of Development DGC/db enclosure 4 1"9WOUDALPINI SE C9AtlPION,HIM YIIL /111Yl1 Cl6[I C 0 L 0 1 . D 0 137 Berichmark Road PO Box 959 • Avon, Colorado • 81620 • phone 970 845 2535 • fax 970 845 2555 . ~ ` m LioneheAd M$ster Plan Letter Agreement with Town of Vaill Jaauary 17,1997 • VAI shall cooperate 8c panicipate in aIl public process and informational aspects of ma9ter planaing • VAI shRll directlY partioipate in ail stages of master planning, curceutiy described as 1-5 • VAI shall have access to all materials, data, etc., generated in data gathering and site analysis, incIuding physical conditions, traffc, infrastructure, . cotastsints, opportunities, etc., ~ VAI shalt shate with TOV all merial map data and any other materials, maps, or other physical information prcviously generated in Lionshead studies • It's understood that the physical data will ultiaistely become part of the public domain and available through TOV for the cost of nproduction ~ VAI retains or shall retain proPrietarY rights to all fiaancisl profocmas, etc., until and unless shared with TOV with thc pcpl~ iSe cit~iritent tt:at the infonmation become part of the public record • VAI dt the T4V each agtee to share all data or infoimation they may respeceively have regarding propqty pwners4ip, convenants, lease holds, uses, . • VAI get copies: hard eopy 8c CAD: of all products/deliverables generated iri the master plan process . ° VAI pays one half on the actuai cost incurred by TOV, payable to Design Workshop, Pursuant to the mASter platuung letter agrecment betvveen TOV & DWI, not to exceed $200,000. VAI to pay TOV as invoiced • VAI gets copy of the progratn, wish list data and matrix a VAI will copy TOV with ski qperations program aad any presumptive data forming 4he basis for this progratn • VAI will give to TOV basic retail market analysls, but keep as proprietaty any information expiieitly regarding product tnix, prospective tenants, retail or rentat rates for VAI propcrties, etc., • VAI will contribute a projeet ar mazket armlysis regsrding retail demand • VAI will contract w'sth Arthur Andersen for a market and financial analysis, including tax inerement financing studies, which would serve as the basis for an urban xenewal or a downtown development authority bond issuance • TOV will pay one-half of the actual costs incurred by YAI, payable to Arthur Andersen, pursuant to a services agrecment, aot to execed $100,Od0. TOV to . pay VAI as invoiced • V'AI will participate in a11 design charettes and alternative studies for land Planning, building massing, intrastructure planninB, design guideline drafting, etc., • VAI will participate in zoning or land use ordinance drafting and/or regulatory and guideline dtafting or development . j:WansloorbinlLionshead Mastet plar, Letcer qgreement TOV , ~ ~~t.~. ~(~c.~ i tti d• i c- ti h(,C 4VAIL TOU~ 1309 vail Valley Drive Department of Public Works/Transportation Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21 S81FAX 303-479-2166 January 15, 1997 Sent via FAX & mail Mr. James L. Viele J.L. Viele Construction Inc. 1000 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Jim: This letter is a follow up to your request for modification to the construction work hours at the Vail Villaae Club project and the subsequent discussion held with the Town Council on the 14th of January. The Town Council has approved the following modifications and conditions for continuing work on the project. 1. Approved exterior work, Monday through Saturday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Approved interior work. Monday through Saturday from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. 3. No work will be allowed February 15-17 (Presidents Vl%eekend); March 15-16 (World Cup Finals); and March 29-3 1(Easter). 4. No Saturdav deliveries to the construction site will be allowed. 5. The developer/contractor, is to provide for Hanson Ranch Road traffic control as part of this project. You should immediately coordinate the specific details of implementing this requirement directly with the Chief of Police, Grea Morrison. His phone number is 479-2209. 6. All previous conditions contained in our November 27,1996 letter regarding delivery times for construction materials/supplies, on site snow removal, and employee off site parking remain in effect. 7.. The Town Council will review compliance with these conditions at its February 11 th work session. It is important these conditions be adhered to in the interest of minimizing economic and neighborhood impacts, visitor and guest skiing experience, and most of all, continued progress in completing this project as soon as possible. If you have any questions or need clarification in regards to any of these conditions, please call me directly at 479-2173. Sincerely, Larry E. Grafel Director. xc: Vail Town Council Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town ManageF Greg Morrison, Chief of Police . Susan Connelly, Director of Community Development " Larry Pardee, Construction Inspector MEMORANDUM TO: Pianning and Environmental Commission FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: February 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Review of existing GRFA policy and alternatives Staff: Russell Forrest 1. PIJFtPOSE: The purpose of this worksession is to review the analysis for three alternatives to the existing GRFA policy for single family, duplex, and primary/secondary type structures. This worksession is intended to describe: how to implement each of these alternatives; what homes might look like under each alternative; and to identify considerations that would need to be evaluated for each of these alternatives. The PEC will be asked to comment on ihe effectiveness and appropriateness of each alternative. In addition, the worksession provides an opportunity for the PEC to request additional information that will further clarify and describe the consequences of an alternative. On February 28th, the PEC will be asked to select which alternative they would like to recommend to the Vail Town Council. II. BACKGFiOIJND: The Vail Town Council directed staff to evaluate the existing GRFA system and determine whether this is an effective and appropriate tool when compared to other alternatives. Three reoccurring issues have been raised by the Town Council which include: 1) Is GRFA an effective tool in controlling mass and bulk? 2) Is it appropriate that the Town should be reviewing interior floor space? and 3) Is it an effective use of staff time (both TOV and designers/builders)? In October 1996, Tom Braun, the planning consultant for this project, prepared a paper which addressed the following: 1) Reoccurring concerns/issues with the existing system, 2) Objectives of having mass and bulk controls, 3) Mechanisms for controlling bulk and mass, 4) History of GRFA in Vail, 5) Analysis of how seven other resort communities control bulk and mass, and 6) Analysis of five alternatives. At the public meetings on October 30th and 31 st, Tom Braun presented the findings in the background paper. A majority of the time at the meeting was spent obtaining input from the public on the existing system, discussing pros and cons of alternatives, and identifying new alternatives. Approximately 45 people attended these meetings. 1 The PEC reviewed this analysis on November 11, 1996. Four members felt that alternative three (eliminating GRFA) was the best alternative with certain conditions. The PEC felt that if GRFA was eliminated, additional design guidelines would be needed. 'One commissioner that supported alternative three, felt that at least two architects should sit on the Design Review Board. The other three members of the PEC felt ihat some form of GRFA should continue. One member felt strongly that GRFA does effectively control bulk and mass and eliminating the system would increase the size of structures in the Town of Vail. The other two members were interested in pursuing alternatives 2 and 4(allow interior modifications and don't count basement space in GRFA calculations, respectively). Overall, there seemed to be a consensus on the Commission that home owners, particularly owner occupied homes, should be able to do interior remodels without GRFA being an issue. Council reviewed the analysis on November 26th and directed staff to examine the following alternatives (not listed by priority/preference) in more detail: ' Allow interior modifications to exceed the maximum GRFA allowance for existing structures, provided such additions do not add to the bulk and mass of the home. ` Amend the definition of GRFA to exclude basement space from calculation as GRFA. ` Eliminate the use of GRFA for controlling mass and bulk for single family, duplex, and primary/secondary type structures. The Vail Town Council was very clear that any alternative should not significantly increase bulk and mass. The Council was also very sensitive to any recommendation that might inhibit creative design solutions. In addition, several Council members were interested in exploring how vaulted space could be better addressed in the Town's regulations. 111. PROCESS OVERVIEW: The process for this project is broken into three phases 1) identification of alternatives; 2) analysis of alternatives; and 3) legislative review of the preferred alternative. The following are specific steps in the process. Phase I Identification of Alternatives 1) Background analysis of existing GRFA system and alternatives. September & October, 1996 2) Public meetings to review pros and cons of existing GRFA system October 30th & and alternatives. & 31 st, 1996 3) Presentation to PEC and Town Council to review pros/cons and November 11 & (PEC) public input. The purpose of these public meetings was to November 26 determine if any of the alternatives could be eliminated. 1996 2 Phase II Analyze how 4o implemen4 alternatives and identify the impacts of each alternative 4) Complete analysis of alternative approaches. December & January 1996/1997 5) PEC Worksession to review 3 alternatives February 10, 1997 6) PEC Meeting to recommend an alternative February 24, 1997 7) Council Worksession to select an alternative February 25, 1997 Phase III Legislative review of preferred alternative 8) Staff prepares language to modify Town Code March 1997 9) PEC: worksession to consider code revisions March 24, 1997 10) PEC: public hearing April 7, 1997 11) Town Council: worksession to review proposed revision to April 22, 1997 the existing GRFA regulations 12) Town Council: first reading of an ordinance May 6, 1997 13) Town Council: second reading of an ordinance May 20, 1997 ` These dates are tentative and subject 4o change SII. SUMMARV The attached paper by Tom Braun is intended to assist in evaluating the three remaining alternatives in the GRFA analysis. The goal of this paper and the presentation on February 10th is to help provide a picture of what each alternative might look like if it were implemented in Vail. Please make note of any additional information or graphics that might assist the PEC in making a final recommendation for the Town Council on February 24th. There is a discussion of additional design guidelines that are discussed in the "eliminate GRFA" alternative which staff feels should be examined under any alternative. Staff feels these guidelines would provide much needed criteria to assist the Design Review Board in its decision making process. f:levc ryone\niss\memos\grfa.2 10 3 &BA II / BIRAlUl N ASS0CI A TIE S, II NC. PLANNING and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORf91NDUM TO: Russ Forest FROM: Tom Braun DATE: February 6, 1997 RE: Phase II of GRFA Analysis Attached you will find the Phase II GRFA Analysis which provides further analysis of the three potential alternatives to the current GRFA system. These three alternatives, as selected by the Town Council, include 1) the conversion of interior space in homes that meet or exceed allowable GRFA, 2) the exclusion of basement space from calculation as GRFA, and 3) the elimination of GRFA. The following information is provided for each of these alternatives: 1) Description of Alternative A brief description of the alternative is provided in this section. 2) Issues to be Addressed This section highlights some of the pertinent comments and considerations raised by the Council, Commission and public during previous discussions regarding GRFA. 3) Proposed Lanvuage This section outlines how and where each alternative could be incorporated into the Town's zoning code and presents preliminary language for implementing the alternative. This should not be considered "final ordinance language". Rather, it is intended to provide the Council, Planning Commission and community with a better understanding of how each alternative could be implemented and additional issues that will need to be resolved during the implementation phase of this process. 4) Issues to Consider Outstanding issues and implications relative to each alternative are highlighted in this section. As we have discussed, the purpose of this phase in the GRFA Analysis is to further understand the issues and implications relative to each potential alternative. It is important to understand that it is not the intention of this phase to resolve all potential issues related to each alternative. Rather, this report identifies outstanding issues that would need to be addressed during the third and final step in this process. This report will hopefully provide the PEC and Town Council with the information needed to identify a preferred alternative to the existing GRFA system. Minturn Ironworks Building Phone - 970.827.5797 201 Main Street, 2nd Floor Fax - 970.827.5507 Post Office Box 776 Minturn, Colorado 81645 Alternative #1 - Interior Conversions Description of Alternative Modify zoning regulations in order to allow for additional GRFA in existing homes that currently exceed allowable GRFA, provided such additions do not add to the bulk and mass of the home. Similar to the 250 Ordinance, this alternative would only apply to existing homes. There would be no change to the review process (i.e. GRFA system) for new construction. This approach is intended to allow flexibility to owners of existing homes by allowing GRFA to be created within the interior space of a home (i.e. loft additions, conversion of crawl space, etc). Issues to be Addressed • Alternative must provide assurances that modifications to homes do not increase building bulk and mass. Proposed Language This alternative would be implemented with the additior? of a new chapter in the zoning code similar in the manner in which the 250 Ordinance has been structured. This chapter would have the following major sections: 1) Purpose The puipose of this chapter is to pruvide flexibility and latitude in the use of interior spaces within existing single-family and two-family structures that meet or exceed allowable GRFA by allowing for the conversion of interior spaces to GRFA provided certain conditions and standards are met. 2) Applicability • Any existing single-family residence or any existing dwelling unit in a structure containing no more than two dwelling units shall be eligible to add additional GRFA in excess of existing or allowable GRFA provided that the additional GRFA complies with the standards outlined in paragraph 3 below. • Multi-family units are not eligible for additional GRFA permitted by the provisions of this chapter. 3) Standards • Proposals for the utilization of additional GRFA under this provision shall not add to or increase the building bulk and mass of the existing structure. Examples of exterior modifications which add to or increase building bulk and mass include, but are not limited to any expansion of the existing exterior form of the structure, re- grading around a structure in a manner which exposes additional exterior walls, the expansion of existing roofs and the addition of roof dormers. Examples of exterior modifications which are not considered to add to or increase building bulk and mass include, but are not limited to the addition of windows, skylights and window- wells. • Proposals for the utilization of additional GRFA under this provision shall comply with all Town of Vail zoning standards and applicable development standards. • If the proposal involves the conversion of a garage or enclosed parking space to GRFA, such conversion shall not reduce the total number of enclosed on-site parking spaces. Phase IUGRFA Analysis 4) Process 0 Application made to Department of Community Development to include applicable forms, fees, and existing and proposed floor plans. Design review application shall be required for all proposals involving modifications to exterior of buildings. 0 Community Department staff shall review application for compliance with this chapter and all applicable zoning and development review regulations. ° Proposals deemed by the Community Department staff to be in compliance with this chapter and all applicable zoning and development review regulations shall be approved. Proposals deemed to not comply with this chapter and all applicable zoning and development review regulations shall be denied. ° Upon receiving approvals pursuant to this chapter, applicants shall proceed with securing building permit prior to initiating construction of project. Issues to Consider The "mechanics" of implementing the interior conversion alternative are fairly straight forward. Outstanding issues pertain primarily to when this option could be utilized by a homeowner. For example, the language outlined above states that the purpose of this alternative is to "provide flexibility and latitude in the use of interioi• spaces within existin single-family and two-family structures". This begs the question of when is a home "existing". The following summarizes implications relative to the applicability of this alternative: 0 Allow interior conversions for all homes The potential concern with allowing interioc• conversions for all homes is that new homes will comply with GRFA but will be designed to allow for the conversion of space in the future. For example, it would be relatively easy to design over-sized void spaces in basement levels and to design additional or larger vaulted spaces on upper levels, both of which could then be converted to floor area in the future if this alternative is available to all homes. The end result of this scenario could be new homes that are larger than they would otherwise have been if interior conversions were not permitted. ~ Reauire new construction (homes completed after adoption of this ordinance to wait a certain time period prior to utilizing ordinance If there is concern with the scenario outlined above, an alternative would be to require a waiting period (i.e. the five years required for the 250 ordinance) before new homes could apply for interior conversions. Having to wait a period of time could be a disincentive for people who would otherwise design a home to accommodate future interior conversions. However, this scenario does raise a question - if an interior conversion (and the potential impact of larger homes designed specifically to utilize this provision) is deemed to be acceptable after a five-year waiting period, why is it not acceptable after a one-year waiting period, or a one-month waiting period? ~ Limit interior conversions to homes in existence at the time ordinance is adoDted This is the cleanest way to implement the alternative. Limiting interior conversions to homes in existence at the time the ordinance is adopted eliminates any potential concern with homes being designed for future interior conversions. However, limiting interior conversions to homes in existence at the time ordinance does raise an equity question - is it fair to deny an owner who builds in the future the same opportunity available to other homeowners? Phase IUGRFA Analysis Alternative #2 - Basement Space Description of Alternative This alternative would amend the definition of GRFA to exclude basement space from calculation as GRFA. Issues to be Addressed • Develop a clearly stated definition of basement space, ensure that grades cannot be artificially modified to allow for space to be interpreted as basement. Proposed Language The definition of GRFA includes paragraph 18.04.130 A. which excludes certain areas from calculation as GRFA in buildings containing two or fewer units. In order to implement this alternative, this paragraph would be modified with the addition of the following: 5. The floor area of any level of a structure that is located a minimum of six (6) feet below natural grade (or existing grade prior to construction) at all points around the structure. While this language is probably the cleanest, most straight forward way to exclude basement space, is only excludes space that is 100% below gc•ade. This alternative would not exclude basement space for walkout levels. An alternative for addressing walkout levels is the following: 5. The floor area of any level of a structure that is located a minimum of six (6) feet below natural grade (or existing grade prior to construction) at all points around the structure. For any level which is partly above and partly below grade, a calculation of the portion of the subject level which is below grade shall be made in order to establish the percentage of the level which shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. This percentage shall be made by determining the total percentage of lineal exterior wall of the subject level which is located a minimum of six (6) feet below natural grade (or existing grade prior to construction) which shall then be multiplied by the total floor area of the subject level, and the resulting total shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. Issues to Consider • Excluding basement space from cal.culation as GRFA will create the opportunity for new "above grade" GRFA for new construction and for homes with basement space that was previously calculated as GRFA. • One of the goals of this process is to simplify the GRFA system. The second alternative which addresses walkout levels would add to the complexity of the existing system. Should the exclusion of basement space include walkout levels or be limited to basement space that is 100% below grade? Phase IUGRFA Analysis CAILCUILA7[['gON OF BASIEMENT SPACE 4D ~ ' - 161 ~ i i Building Cross-secteon Point where basement level is 6' below grade Slab on grade Point where basement ~ level is 6' below grade T Basement Level 25, 1,250 sq. ft. 50' Basememt ILevel lFfloor ]Plan CALCUILATION 150' - LINEAR EXTERIOR WALL AT BASEIVIENT LEVEL 50' - PORTION OF EXTERIOR WALL 6' OR MORE BELOW GRADE 33%- PERCENTAGE OF BASEMENT LEVEL 6' OR MORE BELOW (50'/150') 1,250 (SQ. F`I'. BASEMENT LEVEL) X.33 = 412 SOUARE FEE7C E%CLUDED Alternative #3 - Eliminate GRFA Description of Alternative This alternative would eliminate GRFA as a tool for controlling the bulk and mass of single-family, duplex and primary/secondary buildings. In order to prevent the development of large, non- descript boxes, this alternative would also include more restrictive site coverage standards for larger lots and new design guidelines that specifically address building bulk and mass. Existing GRFA regulations would remain in place for structures that contain more than two dwelling units. Issues to be Addressed Based on input from the community, the PEC and the Town Council, the major issues to address relative to the potential implementation of tliis alternative are: • Assurances/controls must be established to prevent the design and construction of large, non-descript box-like structures. • The DRB must be capable of interpreting and implementing any proposed modifications to the design guidelines. • Any measures proposed to prevent large, non-descript box-like structures must not stifle design creativity. Proposed Language This alternative would involve four major elements: 1) Initiate a"global search" of the zoning code to identify all references to GRFA pertaining to single-family, duplex and primary/secondary development. Examples of these references include: • the definition of GRFA for buildings containing two or fewer units, and • the reference to GRFA in the density section of single family, duplex and primary/secondary zone districts. 2) New parking requirements for sing.le-family, duplex and primary/secondary units: • A minimum of three (3) off street parking spaces shall be provided for each single family unit or for each dwelling unit within a duplex or primary/secondary structure. Parking requirements for Type II, III and IV EHU's shall be as per the EHU Ordinance. 3) New site coverage regulations to limit the site coverage (and size) of homes on large lots: Site coverage shall not exceed the total of: 1) 20% of the total site area for lots 25,000 square feet or less, plus 2) 10% of the total site area for any portion of a lot in excess of 25,000 square feet. With the exception of lots that exceed 30% slope, site coverage of 20% is currently permitted on all lots regardless of size. The proposal below would introduce a graduated scale similar to the existing GRFA formula whereby allowable site coverage would decrease relative to the size of the lot. Refer to the accompanying chart for an analysis of how this new regulation varies from existing site coverage standards. 4) New design guidelines for single-family, duplex and primary/secondary buildings which specifically address bulk and mass: Phase IUGRFA Analysis Building Hei2ht. Bulk and Mass The size and scale of single family, duplex and primary/secondary homes pIay an important role in defining the character of neighborhoods and the overall visual image of a community. Building height and site coverage regulations outlined in the Vail Zoning Code establish quantitative standards which limit the overall size, or bulk and mass of buildings. Notwithstanding these quantitative standards, site specific features such as vegetation and topography and architectural solutions significantly influence the perceived bulk and mass of a building. An underlying goal for the design of single family, duplex and primary/secondary homes in Vail is to ensure that buildings convey a human scale and are sensitive to their site. Large, monumental buildings which in the determination of the DRB dominate their site and express excessive bulk and mass are not permitted. The following guidelines are designed to accomplish these goals by establishing parameters to ensure appropriate building bulk and mass. These guidelines apply to all single family, duplex and primary/secondary homes: Building Hei~ht Buildings should convey a predominantly one or two-story building mass. Three-story massing may be approved by the DRB, however, large expanses of continuous three-story building mass is not permitted. Generally, the footprint of a third floor should not exceed 50% of the floor area immediately below and horizontal and/or vertical building off-sets should be provided to reduce the perceived bulk and mass of the building. Buildin Form In lieu of large, monumental building mass, buildings should be designed as either a composition of smaller, integrated building forms or in a form which consists of one primary building mass in conjunction with one or more secondary building forms. Rid elines Changes in the height and orientation of roof lines add variety and interest to buildings which can reduce building bulk and mass. The extent of variations in the height and orientation of ridgeline elevations is dependent upon the characteristics of a site and the design of the building. Generally, the maximum length of any continuous ridgeline should not exceed 50-70' without a change in the orientation of the ridgeline or a variation of at least 34' feet in the elevation of the ridgeline. Sloping Lots Buildings on sloping lots should be designed to "step" with natural contours of the site in order to maintain a predominantly one to two-story building mass. Building Scale A variety of architectural details can be incorporated into the design of a building to reinforce human-scale and reduce the overall bulk and mass of a building. Use of the following should be considered in the design of homes: 0 Dormers 0 Decks and balconies 0 Roof overhangs 0 Fenestration Refer to the accompanying sketches for examples of how these design concepts can be more clearly expressed in graphic form. Phase IUGRFA Analysis Issues to Consider • In order to not limit architects design creativity, qualitative guidelines are proposed in lieu of quantitative standards. This alternative places a great deal of responsibility in the hands of the DRB, is the Board capable af this task? • Are design guidelines explicit enough and will they provide the DRB with the tools necessary to prevent "large, non-descript boxes"? • Is it necessary to reduce allowable site coverage for larger lots or will a reduction to allowable site coverage encourage taller buildings? • Are three parking spaces per unit adequate or is some other formula (i.e. based on number or bedrooms) necessary? • Is there a need for design guidelines which address bulk and mass regardless of whether or not changes are made to the GRFA system? Phase IUGRFA Analysis Town of Vail GflZFA AnalySiS Po4eaitiaY Desigii (yuidcliiies/No GIZFA /lltcrnativc I3uilding Height Buildings should convey a predominantly one or two-story building mass. Three-story massing may be approved by the DRB, however, large 'LI;V expanses of continuous three- ~ , „ -t~-~~~•• ~ ~ story building mass is not permitted. Generally, the footprint of a third floor should not exceed 50°Io of the floor p~ area immediately below and horizontal and/or vertical - - building off-sets should be provided to reduce the Ll~ ~ perceived bulk and mass of the ~ building. r~- Tlu-ee stories are appropriate because floor area of third level does not exceed SO% of level below. ~ _ - ' ~ - - - - - - - - , - :~i,; r ~ - - - \ - - - - - Variation in ridge line elevations, building offsets, use of dormers and decks reduce bulk and mass, building does not "read" as three stories. Town of Vail GRFA Analysis Potential Design Guidelines/No GRFA Alternative ~ Building Form In lieu of large, - - ` - monumental building mass, buildings should be designed as either a composition of smaller, integrated building forms or in a form which consists of one primary building mass and one or more secondary building forms. Composition of building forms reduces building bcslk and mass. , Secondaryform ~ Primary form ~ . . . - , ~ • r n T. d~:~,~•~~ •'~1,.i ~ j^~~- Mt' 1: Primaryforrri Secondary form _ ~ ~ ~ ~'t ~ Examples of prirrcary and secondary building forms. These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside of the Town of Vail, it is not suggested tha[ these exac[ sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Rather, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to reinforce the design guidelines proposed for the "no grfa" alternative. l,OWdfl Of VaHl GgZF'A AnaI3'SES Potentfla9 Desagn Gugclelines/No GRFA Alternative Ridgelines Changes in the height and , orientation of roof lines add ~ 7SO --10' ~ variety and interest to buildings which can reduce building bulk and mass. The extent of variations in the height and orientation of ridgeline elevations is dependent upon the characteristics of a site , and the design of the building. Generally, the maximum length of any continuous ridgeline should not exceed 50-70' without a Ridgelines greater than 50'-70' .should be off- change in the orientation of the set at least 3'-4'. ridgeline or a variation of at least 34' feet in the elevation of the ridgeline. ftT . Variations in roof ridgelines provide variety and breaks-up ~ building mass created by continuous ridgeline. Change in ridge line elevation and orientation creates two di.stinct building forms and breaks up building rrcass. These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside of the Town of Vail, it is not suggested tha[ these exact sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Ralher, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to reinforce the design guidelines proposed for the "no grFa" alternative. Town of Vail GRFA Analysis Potential Design Guideliiies/No GRFA Alternative Sloping Lots Buildings on sloping lots should be designed to "step" with natural contours of the site in order to maintain a predominantly one to two- story building mass. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ .r r. Building mass should be "bertched" into the hillside. t , - w~ - D ~ Y r,~ ~ • - \ Building steps with the natural contours af the site to maintain one-two story massing. These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside of the Town of Vail, it is not sugges[ed that these exact sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Rather, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to reinforce the design guidelines proposed for the "no grfa" alternative. llown of Vail GRI±A Analysis Potenteal IDesigii Guicleflincs/No GRFA flltca-ciativc Building Scale A variety of architectural details can be incorporated into the design of a building to reinforce human-scale and reduce the overall bulk and mass of a building. Use of . the following stiould be considered in the design of homes: ~ ' , • -Dormers • ' . -Decks and balconies -Roof overhangs -Fenestration . ~ -h « ' `4~?, . . . • ~ ~ Building offsets, roofline and dormer ~ all contribute to reduce the mass of this building. . ~ 'yt i ~ . i ' a•~ Bay window and balcony reinforce - oa human-scale. These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside af the Town of Vail, it is not suggested that these exact sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Rather, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to reinforce the design guidelines proposed for the "no grfa" alternative. 1 . TOV GRFA Analysis/Site Coverage Comparison Allowable Coverage Allowable Coverage ~ °Io coverage w/ j Difference between existing Lot Size at 20% (sq. ft.) ~ w/proposed amend. ~ proposed amend. I proposed regs (sq. ft.) 9,000 1,800 1,800 20.00% I 0 10,000 2,000 2,0001 20.00% 0 11,000 2,200 2,200I 20.00% 0 12,000 2,400 2,4001 20.00% 0 13,000 2,600 2,600 20.00% 0 14,000 2,800 2,800 20.00% 0 15,000 3,000 3,000 20.00%I 0 16,000 3,200 3,200I 20.00% 0 17,000 3,400 3,400 20.00% 0 18,000 3,600 3,6001 20.00% I 0 19,000 3,800 3, 800 1 20.00% 0 20,000 4,000 4,000 20.00% I 0 21,000 4,200 4,200I 20.00% 0 22,0001 4,400I 4,400I 20.00% I 0 23,000 4,600 4,6001 20.00% 0 24,000 4,800 4, 800 1 20.00°l0 0 25,000 5,000 5,0001 20.00%1 o 26,000 5,200 5,1001 19.62% -100 27,000 5,400 5,200I 19.26% I -200 28,000 5,600 5,300I 18.93% -300 29,000 5,800 5,4001 18.62% I -400 30,000 6,000 5,500I 18.33% -500 31,000 6,200 5,600 18.06% -600 32,000 6,400 5,700I 17.81 % -700 33,000 6,600 5,800I 17-800 34,000 6,800 5,900 1 17.35% -900 35,000 7,000 6,0001 17.14% I -1,000 36,000 7,200 6,100 16.94% I -1,100 37,000 7,400 6,200 16.76% j -1,200 38,000 7,600 6,300I 16.58% -1,300 39,000 7,800 6,400 16.41% -1,400 40,000 8,000 6,5001 16.25% 1 -1,500 41,000 8,200 6,600I 16.10% I -1,600 42,000 8,400 6,700 15.95%1 -1,700 i Other Issues Relative to GgtFA Asnenclments 1. Amendments for EHU's and Permanent Residents Only During previous discussions comments were made to allow the provisions of these alternatives in conjunction with the developinent of EHU's or only for permanent residents of Vail. These are Town Council policy decisions. The information outlined above addresses the technical aspects of each alternative. Limiting the applicability of these provisions to only EHU's andlor permanent residents could be done. This would not, however, further the original intent of this process which was to: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of GRFA as a means for controlling building size 0 Address the time required to administer the current system 0 Resolve the appropriateness issue of the Town regulating interior floor space Limiting the applicability of any GRFA amendment to either encourage EHU's or for the benefit of permanent residents only could be incorporated into any of the three alternatives. 2. Vaulted Space One recognized short-coming of GRFA is that it regulates floor area and not building volume and as a result GRFA does not effectively control building bulk and mass. Aspen is the only cammunity that has been identified which addresses vaulted space with floor area regulations. The Aspen code essentially applies a multiplier to the floor area of vaulted space. For example, floor area with 10' plate heights or less count at a ratio of one square foot for each one square foot. For intec•ior areas with a plate height which exceeds 10', the ratio increases by .OS feet for each foot over 10' up to a maximum ratio of two square feet for each one square foot (i.e. an interior space with 15' ceilings is calculated at a ratio of 1.25 square feet for each one square foot of floor area). Phase IUGRFA Analysis . CRAYoSTONE ~ P.O. BOX 721 ~ MINTURN, CO 81645 COIVSTRUCTIOIV AND DEITELOPMENT, INC. 970/827-5231 0 970/827-5886 Fnx ~ E-MAIL: Crayston@Col~t x~. Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO January 28, 1997 Dear Susan, - After a hectic hoiiday season and some January settling in,1 am belatedly writing to express our . great delight in working with the Department of Community Development in the disaster repair of Dominos Pizza, in the Vail Run Building, after their flood. Everyone that we worked with (including Dan, Charlie, Lauren, and Russ) was aggressively positive in helping us to get the store open by Christmas. We built that store in 1988 for Arthur Cole (the owner), as well as a store in Glenwood and one in Avon. Arthtir Cole is an old friend and supporter and when he calls, we respond and serve his needs. He called me on Christmas Eve to emphatically express his thanks, and even surprise at our success. I reininded him that we had a measure of luck and the complete support of the town in helping us to open up with nothing but green lights. In closing I'd like to say that whereas I've had my times of being unhappy and even perturbed with Town of Vail policy or procedure, I didn't want to miss the opportunity to express my gratitude for the friendly, positive, and professional assistance experienced at Commi.uiity - Development. Z Since , _ i . ray , President . Gray-Stone Construction an -Development, Inc. cc: Bob McLauren , # - A a,('' 4VAIL TOWN 75 South Frontage Road Department of Police Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2200 February 3, 1997 Edelweiss Cordominium Association Attantior_: Rick Haitermann 103 Willow Place Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. HaZtermann: Thank you for your letter dated 01/22/97. We are always anxious to hear suggestions on how our operation can be improved. Attacned you will find a matrix describing our new rules regarding loading and delivery in vail Village. This plan has been developed in cooperation with village merchants, restauranteurs, lodge representatives, as well as trucking companies, delivery serv4c2s, trash removal companies, etc., over the Iast several months. Jim Lamont of the East Village Homeowners Association has represented the interests of residential property owners in this process, as well. We are certainly open te further moci=;cations, if necassary. You can imagine that this issue sparks heated debate among all of the various ir_terests in the Village. In working with community me:nbers, however, we have hoped to strike a balance tnat is acceptabie to all. As you can see by the matrix, we now allow trucks of all sizes "front parking" to the businesses they serve until 8:30 a.m. After that, they may only park in designated areas. One of those, willow Bridge Rd., is off limits to big trucks after 12:00 noon but accessible to other trucks until 6:00 p.m. This should result in less truck traffic in that area. The Vail Town Council will take up the matter of loadinq and delivery in its work session on March 11, 1997. We hope they will endorse this plan at, that time. Your concerns will be passed on at that meeting, however, your presence is encouraged. _ Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any other questions or comment s . Thank you again for your correspondence. Sincerely, TOWN OF VAIL . ~ Ji Layman Acting Chief of Police cc: Jim Lamont Pam Brandmeyer 6 RECYCLEDPAPER VAL VILLAGE PQRKING ZONES (fl~~~~~~ON & T6MES) BR1DGE S'T GORE C6iEEK DR AflILL CREE6( 304 GORE CREEK HARiSON RANCh9 WILL0W BRIDGE CHECOC POIPdY BUILDIMG FiOAD ROAD CHARLIE CAFiS UNTIL 8:30 ARfl UNTIL 11:30 ARA UNTIL 6;00 PRfl UNTIL 6:00 Pflfl UNTIL 6:00 PAA UNTIL 6:00 pM UNTIL 6:00 PM SRAALL TRUC@CS UNTIL 8:30 AAfl UNTIl.11:30 ARA UNTIL 6;00 PRfl UNTIL 6:00 PAA UNTIL 6:00 PwA UNTIL 6:00 PflA UNTIL 6:00 PPA (UP TO 18 FY.) ~ . . rf1AEDIUflA T6iUCKS UNTIL 8:30 AAfl UNTIL 19:30 AFN UNTIL 6:00 PRfl WOT ALLOdUED a UNTIL 11:30 dBH UNTIL 6;00 pAA UNTIL 6:00 PI1H (19 To 35 Fr) LARGE TRUCKS UNTIL 8:30 AAfl IIPITIL 11:30 APfI UNTIL 12 NOOtd PIOT ALLOWED UNTIL 11:30 Aflfl UNTIL 12 NOOP! UNTIL 12 NOOF! (36 FT.+) TRASH TNUCKS UNTIL~8:30 AAA UtdTll, 9:00 AnA UNTIL 9:00 AAA UNTIL 9:00 AfiN UNTIL 9:00 AM UNTIL 9:00 dRlV UNTIL 9:00 AAA COURIER UNTIL 8:30 AAfl UNTIL 6:00 p11A UNTIL 6:00 PF,A UNTIL 6:00 PAA UNTIL 6:00 PAfl UNTIL 6:00 PM UNTIL 6:00 PRfl SERVICES ALL ZOPdES dRE PERAAITS AAUST 30 AAINUTES BE IPd FRQfdT - (MAX.) WIPdDOW ...'~~i:.>.:;:::;: • _ - ~i . ~•L, ~ l.. , i..;,.;.,...;,,, rp ( / , yT-vS/.~1L~~-- l ,-i. - ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~T•!`:.~.~~_.l 1 ~ ~ ~,.~_l l. ~ ! ' ~ t~ -r- ~`l~•-l~'r-~-~'(~~ ~ ~ ,__i..~ r~ r-.r`r/''-r~/~" ' ~ 1 `~1 . .l; - ~ ~ : CQNE~irD~ ~ ~ Wl A r. ; M ~ r- r. I`l•, P..~ Ik fp ~ l'~ 1,. I ~ `.'~`y •.•,,,r.~\ ~ ~ NAiIO. BRIUCNAI E 3 ~ _ << cOHE CREEK Pfl011ENADE GRA~15Q1ri~~IMFf~' ~ " ~ ,~~1-l~ v~'~..~ fr ) l C 0 M'K - a ~ o S?~I'~AIMK lq(~r CI UI DREN'S ~ r ~.i ( I C `S> C j~ ~ roU1lrNri ~ 3 1 L JUNN Gui f ~~1119W~h i ~ ~ . 9i~ ItbU4N -~-1.~,~-~. r ~ • ~ ~ / ' ~ ` • . tt~- l:. ~VWH~Ii1,~S~ U R I V E .;~"1' ...:ti.::"::~:••;:; ,'•'.•.!!~R1~,1(J""~;;.:::i:+:t;;;::~::;~`.'::'i;:. C R E E ::.:;:;:::t.::::. ( `k t. o R p E 77 9)CHECKPO INi 7 CIIMLIE v (i0lbf y~i~,,17 ~ G O n Rf Gn9iN ~ y ~ I It : ~in .GUII,131 !C i r ~ A rn ' CR~E HUCkb~'If P 7 K~iiii L `A : . ratmtNC ; t;,tF~ . ~ J '0 0 ~ AIIL hjOtl LA E P < J'-~ i;U.=r~I~ 1+11~' Lptlt;E ' ~ k~p Up?~1 : P ~ Af :VAII. r--1 b ~ ) p \1 l~ 1 ~ l t S ~~.2~TIA~'G1'~ti`%~.;i;ii: . Sf1SlftiT LltliCi ; . - / ` , 1 ~ ~ r ~ I ry. A ~ 4 , 4 1? t ' 00. 111Mk : RCLE 'r• ' . ci . . . . . lIJ / 3 ruRKiIm tk` - - Z 1... ~ U r.l.ltls I.nNr I'1RL IIYllItANT rIRG DGP'1. CONNI'sC'i'LON CONNI",C'I'1ON l. S''ANI) LNC: - I~ l?L'1' AWnY • • 1. IJAI.L p1UUN'L' - 5 l~ li,l;'C AI4AY RECEIVED JAN Edelweiss Condominium Association 103 Willow Place m Vail, Colorado 81657 January 22, 1997 . ` • Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage Road West - Vail, CO 81657 Dear Town Council, As the property manager for both the Edelweiss and the Summers Lodge, I am writiny you regarding truck parking in Vail Village. In fact, I have written a letter a year _ for the past six years and the situation has only 5one from bad to worse. Basically, my Associations are in support of a plan that would place the responsibility of where trucYs should par2c on the buildings and businesses who emFloy those trucks.. Why should my Associations' inherit the problems created by someone else? • ~ : In a related issue, I would also su.gport. a Ylan tnat _ would eliminate evening parking on Willow BridCe Road (to the east of the Sumuners LodSe).. Oftentimes the-entry to_ this Froperty is blocked which makes eineryency access on:- this side of the buildinS impossible in the winter. Why are a se]ect few allowed to park here when there is free parkinS . in the Nar;:ins structure and. you are tryin5._to promote the - idea of apedestrian village? May I suggest that once truck - delivery has been accomplished, this parking area should be- come a no parking zone until 6 A.M., (or whenever tricks-:are allowed to park again).. Whatever change you can make would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your consideration. Sincer2ly, Ric;c Haltermann - - Managing Agent - - • ' Managing Agenc: Burke Management Works, Lcd. . (303) 926-2877 . . . .X~...~~ . . . . ~~G~• . f . . . Towlv'oFVArt. ~ ~ . . . ~ . Input/Ircquiry R,esponse Record • : The attached comments'were:recently received by the Towrt af yaiL We encourage Vail . residents and guests to give us such input and we strive for tiaZely respanses, pI,EASE A.DDRESS THESE CONCaNS N,rIHIlV FIyE WORFCIAJG DAYS AND R;EIMIV TFil,S COMI'LEIED FORM ?O PAM BRANDMEyER, DEPAR UM, TO HA1~IDLE INQUIRY ' ~ ~(,t.C,~. _ . _ . • . ' IiVDNLDliAL TO HANDLE IlVQLJIRY ~ - ~ DATE TOV RECETID ZM7/INQtTjRY. . ~'1•A -y ~ , . - . ?N'E OF WL7/ NOUTRY; . PHON c CALL ('indicate date~ - : . L (attac.hed) ~ MSPOVSE C.A.R.D (attached) . ~ _ . . TLPF OF R SPON'S (c etLort 1; ' . _ . LEIT~t,tZ (attach coPY) " . . , PHONE CAI.I. (indicate date) . . . . , - _ . . . B1Z__TF'_r SMfuARY OF R SPOOR ANSWER T°O TN()TnRV• • _ . - : . ' Dr's? c OFRE:rONSc FOIZtiiREITIRNFD BYDEPA1ZTi1ifEN TTO PAM BRANDIMEY-Z. ' A capy oc :4iY inquirv and loera wiIl cemain oa fsle at tF.e ib V Ccmmemity Rtiatians af$c. .U ,yoCn ta thia foMis cttvr.ted b • • 8nndrrtever, this in4uiry :vii! be mnsidered dased. • 4 s a TOWN OF VAIL MEMORANDUM TO: Robert McLaurin Council Members FROM: Judy Popeck DATE: January 31, 1997 RE: Investment Report Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of December 31, 1996. A$500,000.00 FHLB was purchased on December 31, 1996 with a yield of 5.404% maturing on June 5, 1997. The estimated average yield for the debt service fund was 6.88% and 5.69% for the pooled cash fund. Currently the yield curve for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year are 5.06%, 5.09%, and 5.21% respectively. Please call me if you have any.questions. tl ` Town of Vail, Colorado Investment Report Summary of Accounts and Investments For the Month Ending December 31, 1996 Balances Percentage 12/31/96 of Total Money Market Accounts (see page 1) . Commercial Banks $2,963,572 22.08% Money Market Funds $55,503 0.41 % Totai ~ $3,019,075 22.49% Commercial Savings Banks & Loans Certificates of Deposit (see page 2) ~ Eagle County Institutions $99,000 $99,000 0.74% Other Colorado Institutions $99,000 $99,000 0.74% National Institutions 0.00% Total $198,000 $198,000 1.48% Percentage of Portfolio in Savings & Loans 0.00% U.S. Government Securities (see page 3) Treasury Notes & Bills $3,072,019 22.89% GNMA's $55,865 0.42% Federal Agency Discount Notes & Bonds $7,074,293 52.72% Total $10,202,177 76.03% Total Portfolio $13,419,252 100.00% Maturing Within 12 Months $11,150,273 83.09% Maturing VVithin 24 Months $1,087,482 8.10% Maturing After 24 Months $1,181,497 8.79% $13, 419, 252 100. 00°/a 1 /31 /97 invsmjlp Page 2 Money Market Accounts ° as of December 31, 1996 --For the nAonth of December-- institution Balances Type of Accounts High Low Average 12/31/96 COMMERCIAL BANK ACCOUNTS First Bank of Vail - Operating Interest 5.160% 4.830% 4.970% $4,935,813 $2,719,889 $3,424,510 Balance $2,946,663 Colorado National Bank Super Now Account Interest 3.200% General Operating Account Balance $16,909 Total Commercial Bank Accounts $2,963,572 MONEY MARKET FUNDS ~ Bank One Money Market Fund - Dana Investments Interest 3.806% Balance $49,266 Fidelity Investment Government Money Market Accounts Interest 5.250% Bond Issue Reserve Account Balance $6,237 Total Money Market Funds $55,503 Total all accounts $3,019,075 1/31 /97 invmmjlp Page 3 Certificates of Deposit , as of December 31, 1996 Bank Name, Location Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value BestBank, Thornton Colorado FDIC 7.250% 16-Feb-95 16-Feb-97 47 $99,000 ~ Firstbank of Vail, Vail Colorado FDIC 6.000% 5.830% 26-Jun-95 26-Jun-98 542 $99,000 Avg Yield 6.540% $198,000 1 /31 /97 invcdjlp Page 4 3 9 Govemment Securi6es as of December 31,1996 . „°Treasury Notes & Bills•,° Days to Days Interest Rate Purchase Maturiry AAaturity to Book Par Type Fund Coupon Yeld Date Date at Purchase Matudty Value Value TNote Pooled /.SOD% 5.513% 17-Apr-96 31-Jan-97 289 31 $1,001,576 $1,000,000 TStrip Pooled 5.970% 5.970°/a 26-Apr-96 15-May-97 384 135 $979,662 $1,000,000 TNote Pooled 5.250% 5.450% 18-Nov-96 31-Dec-97 408 366 $598,859 $600,000 TNote Pooled 5.250% 6.370% 11-1un-96 31-Ju1-98 780 577 $491,922 $500,000 Average Yield 5.78% $3,072,019 $3 100 000 Average Days to Maturity 277 '**GNMA'S"' Years to Estimated Interest Rate Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Principal Pool Coupon reld Date Date at Purchase Maturiry Outstandin 5803 8.000% 8.480% 14-Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 11.00 $19,315 13003 8.000% 9.500% 24-Oct-86 15-Oct-06 20.20 12.00 $18,402 14659 8.000% 9200% 24-Oct-86 15-Jan-07 2120 13.00 $18,148 Avg Yield 9.050% $55,865 "'Federal Agency Discount Notes & Bonds•*' Days/Years Days/Years to Interest Rate Purchase Matudty to Matudty Matudty at Book Original Agency Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Month End Value Cost SBA Pooled - Dana 9.475% 29-Jun-94 25-Feb-2008 13.7 11.2 $42,707 $82,749 SBA Pooled - Dana 8.975% 26-May-94 25-Mar-2008 13.8 11.2 $80,652 $109,734 SBA Pooled - Dana 9.475% 18-Aug-94 25-Ju1-2008 13.9 11.6 $62,625 $109,875 SBA Pooled - Dana 8.125% 31-Oct-96 25-Jan-2013 16.2 16.1 $65,190 $65,558 SBA Pooled - Dana 8.725% 29-Jun-94 25-Jun-2019 25.0 22.5 $100,573 $108,523 SBA Pooled - Dana 8.975% 12-Ju1-94 25-Jun-2019 25.0 22.5 $61,676 $108,744 SBA Pooled - Dana 8.725% 08-May-95 25-Dec-2019 24.6 23.0 $93,934 $99,391 FNMA Pooled-Dana 7.534% 21-Nov-96 01-Jan-2021 24.1 24.0 $91,477 $91,486 FNMA Pooled - Dana 6.682% 01-Ju1-96 01-May-2026 29.9 29.4 $55,343 $55,304 FNMA Pooled - Dana 5.987% 24-Jun-96 01-Jun-2026 30.0 29.4 $47,089 $71,318 FNMA Pooled - Dana 8.323% 28-Jun-94 01-Oct-2017 23.3 20.8 $72,106 $97,572 FNMA Pooled - Dana 7.613% 27-May-94 01-May-2020 25.9 23.3 $62,725 $100,577 FNMA Pooled - Dana 7.897% 24-Jan-96 01-Oct-2023 27.7 26.8 $63,734 $75,722 FHLMCPooled - Dana 5.936% 28-Mar-96 01-Mar-2026 29.9 292 $58,699 $66,341 FHLMCPooled - Dana 7.851% 28-Aug-94 01-Aug-2018 23.9 21.6 $66,051 $74,245 FHLMCPooled - Dana 8.416% 28-Jun-94 01-Mar-2019 24.7 22.2 $40,505 $66,355 FHLMCPooled - Dana 6.365% 22-May-96 01-Feb-2036 39.7 39.1 $60,546 $60,461 Average Yield 8.01% $1,125,632 $1 443 955 Average Years to Maturity 21 Days/Years Days/Years to Interest Rate Purchase Maturity to Maturity Matudty at Book Matudty Agency Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Month End Value Value FNMA Debt Service 6.912% 27 Feb-95 17-Jan-97 1.9 17.0 $280,115 $280,000 FHLB Pooled 5.998% 26-Apr-96 10-Nov-97 1.5 314.0 $994,626 $1,000,000 FNMA Pooled 5.340% 22-Nov-96 23-May-97 182.0 143.0 $832,610 $850,000 FHLB Pooled 5.783% 30-Sep-96 25-Sep-97 360.0 268.0 $500,375 $500,000 FNMA Pooled 5.880% 10-Oct-96 10-Jun-98 1.7 1.4 $496,560 $500,000 FNMA Pooled 5.407% 08-Nov-96 13-May-97 186.0 133.0 $1,005,252 $1,025,000 FHLMC Pooled 5.751% 28-Aug-96 28-Aug-97 1.0 240.0 $699,508 $700,000 FHLB Pooled 5.404% 31-Dec-96 05-Jun-97 156.0 156.0 $488,782 $500,000 FFC Pooled 5.794% 27-Jun-95 28-Apr-97 1.8 118.0 $650,833 $650,000 , Average Yield 5,72% $5,948 661 $4 855 000 Average Days to Maturiry 99 Total $10,202,177 1 /31 /97 invtrjlp INVTRI2.WK4 Page 5 SENT BY: 2- 4-97 ;11:50AM ;VAIL VALLEY FNDATION- 3034792157;# 2/ 2 VAMVAU~ ~ F(MMUMmN PM"m kade"kip . i?awrew, c&Wdv-" oa "4wr,a ~ ~ ~ld ammi" :he mw4cs of rtk i. Ow vA voucy , • ~ . , : • z '...c• , : . . ~ ~ IloaW 1 ~ [ irecr.m `'ve-skle„' "`tahl R. R„a Atlnm Amu To. FI2YENI7S OF THE VAgI.. VALLff?Y FOiJNDATIO1V l.enn I). lilaLh (aa`vlyn S. iSLiyilL ~y Ahui~ L. Bull ' FldOM; JO}$N GARNSEY Djtan K. Dory,r:n Qyp~h gyqp yCAILl . . Jamrfi Ikrry Cr~oalr V/ L3Jlu, VRV FOUNDA1 IOIV ' jock ('ru,hy Andrew P. llaly tlarry H- Prampulo, llll )aln l;arnzey DA'j'''.: Fe-bIl'dflaY'y 1997 • . GLucw N. (:Ukll, Jr. • I;illetr( R. Ginrdann . rcn; G .,°~%'amuwx SE.STRIERE WORL.D CHAA/iYIONS11IFeS ~ sLeVL. N. 11,6, • M:,nhA i,,-aa Tlfa Facsfrnile WIItza, J. Hykd - lilai,c W.1Cdnw )•.~h F Kcmp Hentq R. Knvu ~ ~OUR CALENDAR Pcrcr W. A9;m tllzhuch 9c.a[,.Gmericus "°°'-'s. ~~~ttLLi° 1~anted to 1et anY enterv-sted Partaes ka'ow that C..BS wlll be agrang fYie 1997 ~ Ri:u„ry L sLSe. o,«* G~ng Worfld Alpane Ski Championships from Sesiriere, Ita1y ogb the ffollowang ' dat,es: 1cihn C:a«,zzy Ikptaci.L ' Febr~aaary 86: 4:00 - 6:00 p.aYa. c~~1„Febranary 9tk: 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. ~W MountWn Ila. caM,,,;;..,hip~ . Fcbnaary 1511': 4:30 - 6:00 p.an. 19e9 wo,id Alnb~w au ckmnpw,,,nya R F.7 Rbr41 Fo.mna Ft-beaaaa°y 22-d: 4:30 - 6:00 p.m. FebruaTy 23Pd: 4:30 - 6:00 p.xgu. a~,.:•- . r• r5 nW,c Wt,.ia cup . t'wd firc chc FwwQa ' (jmiLl ll. 1'rwd A+hl-hitWeatn lhnnMaauer Mqt~~~ ' tmd Srhadruhila / Vw7 ln+.~narla,m! Pks.v F~stevnl ~ P.O. anc aoy vhil. cdora& at~sse 970-949-1999 . Faa 9711949-9265 o-mvl a~vfops~.meii.net A C4mW6 Spd (c) (3) ~ 1Vohp.* (:orpa?~toe~ F,EB 04 ' 97 11 :59AM P.1/6 xC . • ' • S .F`~ , ; - Ya~i Issociates9 Ince .oo.oa.....o ...........................e....e.....e..... - . . ; FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ~ • • . Media Contacts: ; ; - ilail/Beaver Creek - paul Witt (970) 845-5720 Keystone%Arapahoe Basin/Breckenridge - Jim Felton (970) 453-3210 . + ` QTAI[g, RESORTS ANNO1t7NCES RECTPROCA3[. PYUCING AND 'I'RANSPORTA'1CIOR1 BEIVEFIT5 I+'OR GUES'I'S .etT I1'S FOUR ItESOR7CS i' 0 Co9ouado cC~rd and 5&n 3Card reciproeal praciag proge°aeffi . . o ][n4erchangeab9e mw9ta-day tiskets . . . . . . o DisconnnQ ]laft tackets vwith seasoix passe.o o lLuxu~ ~~~ch scavace betwecea VoA~ axtd Keystor~e/Dreckenradgc VAIL, Colo. -February 4, 1997 - More benefits for the skiing and snowboarding public were uaveiled today a.s Vail Resorts announced three new program involving reciprocal price ciiscouYats and inter-resore transportation for guests of Vail, lBeaver Creek, lKeystone and BreclcenridgE, in addation to the recently announced season pass program. The ' axanoumcement was made by Adam Aron, chairman and chief executive officer of Vail Resorts, Inc. on the saxne day Vail Resorts became listed on the 5dfkvft Neea Yopk Stock Exchange. sio,hdwero. YYa/dpms "'°~°"°ar`~ "On this historic day, when Vail Itesorts' shazes are first trading on the New Xork S4ock , Exehange, we are pleased to introduce a wide array of new, value-filled pricing options for ' our customers," Aron said. "As a public company, Vail Resorts now has access to the capital vve need to comprehensively invest in and upgrade all four of our znountain resozts. At the same time, we have the vc+herewi4hal to create a4tractive arnd aggressive marketing initiatives all designed to benefit customers." "1'kiis sxgnificant axray of guest benefits xs for the remainder of tWs sld season," Aron • contimued. °We expect to have more perrnanent progzams foz next season, but wre vvanted ; ,.eo make sure that our guests and cardholders are able to enjvy right now the variety of ~ • skiing and snowboarding experiences tkzat aIl four our resorts have to offer." ~ . . -more- 6 PO Box 7° Valt,Colorado '81656 a phone 970845 5720 *fax 970 845 5728 e e-mdil! vailpr@vail.net go FEB 04 '97 11:59AM P.2i6 Vail Resorts GuesY Prograzrxs 2-2-2 Colotado Card and Ski 3 Cazd Members Get Recinrocal Price Discount Offers Beginning immediately and lasting through the end of the 1996-97 ski seasom, K.A,B's Sld 3 cards vvill be honored at Vail an,d Beawer Creek, while Keystone and Breckenridge will all accept the iTaiUBeaver Creek Colorado Card. By presenting the Coloxado Cazd at any Breckenridge or Keys4one ticket wzndow, cardholders can purchase a single-day lift ticket to ski at any of those resorts at the Ski 3 price. Colorado Card holders should note that direct-to-lift access is not available at ICeystone or Breckenridge. Similarly, Ski 3 cardholders can present their card at any Vail or Beaver Creek 4icket window and purchase a single-day lift fiicket 4o ski either area for a specially discounted price. Calorado Card and Ski 3 cazd znembers can purchase one ticket pez da-y per card. A pzicing schedule is atta,ched. interchangeable 1Vlulti-day Ticket ]Programs Again staYting anmediately and coatinuing for the rest of the 1996-97 ski season, skiers and snowrboazdezs purchasing a four or more day ticket at Vail or Beaver Creek can exchange up to two of those days for a lift ticket at Keystoue or Breckeaddge_ Sizzlilarly, for a nominal five dollar fee per day, a guest with aK,4,8 four oz more day ticket can spend up to two days on the sloges at'Vail or Beaver Creek. Under the exchange progZam, up to two days of any foiu or naoze day ticket orzginally issued for VaiUBeaver Creek may be directly exchanged for lift tickets at Keystone or Breckenridge. The exchange must be done at aVail or Beaver Creek ticket window, where 4he guest will be issued a single-day KAB ticket. A guest with a four or more day KAB tickee can exchtange up to two days for lift tickets at ilaiUBeaver Creek for a five dollar premium per day. T'he exchange must be done at a lKeys-tone or Bxeckenridge ticket w?indow, where the guest wilb be issued the appropriate single-day tickets for Vail and Beaver Creek. -more- FEH 04 '97 12:00PM P.3i6 Vail Resoxts Gnlest Programs 3-3-3 Luxury Coach Tzanspoztation Beeween Resorts Giaests looking to ski or snowboard at Keystone, Bxeckezuidge, Vail or Beavrer Creek will fand getting to and froffi the areas a lattle easier with the introduction of luxuiry charter coaches rmn»g twice daily between Keystone, Breckenridge, Vail and Beaver Creek. "Thas is a vvonderfiul way for guests at Vail and Beaver Creek to try Keystone and Breckenridge, and vice-versa," said Andy Daly, president of Vail Resorts, Imc. "There's no parking to worry about, the eoaches are incredibly comfortable, and it's the mos4 inexpensive way to get between the resorts." 'lChe Keystone -Vail Express and the Breckenridge -`lail Express, which are seheduled to begin on Thursday, February 6, vvill feature four luxury motor coaches with resfirooms, video znonxtoxs, reclining seats for up to 50 passengers and panorainic windows. The cost oJFthe coach ride will be five dollars per person, round-trip. Children 14 and under are free if accornpanied by a paying adult (one child per adult). Reservations are highly geeorx?mended aaid can be made at the Keystone A.ctivities Desk, the Vail Activities Desk oa by calling 970-496-VA1%.. The route for the Keystone - Vail Express will have stops at the Mountain House in Keystone, 3rd Stree4 Transfer Center in Silverthome, the Eagle Bahn gondola in Liomhead and the Vail Transportation Center in Vail Village. The Breckeiuidge -Va.iI Express zoute will include stops at Beaver Run, the Bell Tower 1VIal1 and north-side BiTatson Street parking lot in Breckenridge, the Frisco TYansfer Center, the Eagle Bahn gondola in d.ionshead and the Vail Transportation Center in Vail \lillage. A schedule for the buses is attached. Each morning bus will have an on-board concierge to check reservations, collect bus fares and ansvver questions about the ski areas. Informational videos r,vill aIso be shovvn. -more- FEB 04 '97 12:00PM P.4i6 Vail R.esorts ruest Progazns 4-4-4 17iscount 1ift ticket nrop-ram for season vassholders In a pzograzn first azuavunced las4 week, season passholders also have special pricing options. Vail/Beader Creek season passholders can now purchase a discourxted daily lift ticket at Breckenridge or YCeystone while ICAB passholders are able to do the same at Vail and Beaver Czeelc for the remainder of the 1996-97 ski season. Vai1/Beaver Cresk season passholders can show their seasom pass at tlle Breckenridge or Keystone ticket windows and purchase a single-day ticket at those areas for $20 for an adult and $10 for a cb,ild. Sizmalazly, a K.A.B season passholder can show theia pass at a Vail or Beaver Creek ticket window and purchase a single-day lift ticket for $25 for an adult amd St 5for a child. Each passholder will be able to purchase one singie-day lzft ticket per day. "A11 of these programs point toward our intention to provide added value to our gttests," concluded I)aly. "VVith Vail, Breckenridge, Keystone and Beaver Creek, we offer the vvidest and bese variety of skiing in Colorado and North America. We encouzage evezyone to try all of our gesorts" -raore- FEB 04 197 12:00PM ' P.5i6 QIAA1G-KEYS7i'OS~ ~~PRESS / VAII, BRECKENRIDG~ EXPRESS llAAILY SCHIEDUy.E5 Br~rridge 4o ~Isail r ~ ~xeekenl~d~*e 16 Vail•r , ~ , rlll5 AIf1VGS DepTf$ Ar{IVOS a 3~ y .3 t fL ~ y 7:30 7:40 7:50 8:10g:sp 4:30 4:40 5_30 5:45 6:05 6:15 7_05 7:20 9:00 9; [ 0 910 9:40 10,20 . . . N ~ BroCll~1zSldg¢ - AM . V511i tO B9l'.i~~l~b:-',$R@` . , , 7',. Dcrart,4 Acrivc,v MS lU7iVGS a 'q7 ~ d il~' .s~~ ~a ~ a m m ~c 7:40 7;55 8:45 L 9:05 430 a:as s:as s:as s:ss 6:10 9:00 9:15 10:15 10:25 6,00 6,10 6-50 7:00 710 7-30 Kq3$oiuit' to Vaal - AM xey'StOhe $o yai9 - ~ld$h • v Aaivcs Dcpl?Rs Aitives 4 o ° b ~ y I Cf 730 7.50 8:35 4:30 530 5:45 400 9:20 10:05 6:05 7:05 7:20 VW1 ~ IKeystimnt - AM ' vao ia x*y3* = ~qw I?e)arts Amvc9 Dcparts Arrives v 7:30 7:45 8:45 4:40 4:55 5:40 5:55 8:45 0:00 10:00 5:40 5:55 6:40 6:55 -m0~- , rEB 04 '97 12=00PM P.6i6 . , . SIG 3 CARD / C~~ORADO CARD PRl[CING SCHEDUY.E THROUGH 1996-97 S]E,A,SiJN Ski 3 and Ski 3Express members ski Vail or Beaver Creelc gor: IDates Adult Cbild February 4 through Febnaary 14 $39 $20 Februazy 18 through April 4 $42 $20 Apri14 through close* $31 $20 There wili be no reciprocal pricing arrangements February 15, 16, 17. Coloxacio Card members ski ICeystone, Breckenridge for: IDates A,dult Child &'ebxuary 4 through February 14 $33 $10 Februazy 18 through April 4 $3 5 $10 April 4 thZOUgh close* $19 $10 There will be no geciprocal pricing arrangements February 15, 16, 17. *Anticnpated closing dates: Breckenridge May 18, 1997 Keystoiae May 11, 1997 Beav+er Creek April 13, 1997 ilail 13pri120, 1997 -30- i u WNSHEAD REDE!/ELOPnAEIVT NiASTER PLAIV MOST FREQIJENTLY ASICED QUESTSOIVS What 6s a Master P6aev 9 A master plan is a set of policies to guide future actions to achieve desired outcomes _ for development or redevelopment. The policies may be presented in the form of. maps, narratives, or a combination of the two. The master plan allows for creative solutions to be presented and implemented for specific issues and sites. H0w does a Master P9an dlffer from a development projecf approval9 A master plan is a document which defines the collective goals for a number of properties to achieve overall redevelopment or development objectives. A development project approval is based, in part, on the master plan, but addresses a specific proposal for one or more properties. Why is thes Redeve0opment Master Planraing Process undeeway novv for Lions/tead? The timing of the master planning process is triggered by interest from Vail ,4ssociates in the redevelopment of its Lionshead properties. Instead of evaluating redevelopment plans on a piecemeal basis, the Vail Town Council has authorized a comprehensive master planning process to make the fullest use of this renewal opportunity and to achieve broader community objectives. The Town Council has identified six policy objectives to serve as the foundation for the planning process. They are: renewal and redevelopment; vitality and amenities; stronger economic base through increased "live beds"; improved access and circulation; improved infrastructure; and creative financing for enhanced private profits and public revenues. What es a"pub9ec ariew corrador"9 Are prevate views protected ? A public view corridor is a defined and delineated vievv from a specific place in publicly accessed areas (e.g., walkways, roads, public open space, etc.) which is preserved and protected from future development. All Town of Vail view corridors are set forth in Chapter 18.73 of the Municipal Code. Private views, which are defined as any views that are not identified in the Municipal Code, are not protected by TOV regulations. This question was decided in the District Court case of Lamb vs. the Town of Vail and the Vail,4th/etic C/ub. In that decision, the court upheld the Vail Town Council's refusal to protect a private view when the proposed development was consistent with the town's zoning regulations. Wh0 has decision making aaethor6ty onvoo The L90n5/'1Bead ~~dePlelOpmePilt MaSt@I' P1an9 Final approval of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan will be made by the Vail Town Council. , Adoption of public view corridors in Lionshead? Final approval of public view corridors in Lionshead will be made by the Vail Town Council. Specific aPeve/opment approvals? Specific development approvals will be reviewed and approved/modified/denied by the Vail Planning and Environmental Commission, the Vail Design Review Board and/or the Vail Town Council, as provided by the Vail Municipal Code, on a case-by-case basis. What is Vail Associates' ro/e in fhe Lionshead Redeve/opment Master Planning process? Vail Associates is both a catalyst in getting the master planning process underway and a financial contributor to the Town's master planning process. The company is also a direct participant in the process, joining other private sector interests who are actively involved. That's because Vail Associates ultimately intends to submit a redevelopment application for the properties it owns within the study area. Although the application will need to be consistent with the eventual outcome of the master plan, it may or may not reflect previously stated ideas expressed by the ski company. The Vail Associates contact for this project is David Corbin of the Vail Associate Real Estate Group, (970) 845-2530. What is the ro/e of Design INorkshop, lnc, in the Lionshead Redeve%pment Master Planning process? Design Workshop is the consultant which has been hired by the Town of Vail to work with Town staff and the community in designing the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The firm's responsibilities include: collecting and assimilating data; development of program diagrams; coordination of all sub-consultants; analyzing design and planning alternatives; development of the master plan based on public input and recommendations by Town of Vail staff; development of a series of architectural guidelines; creation of a digital data base for future planning and design use; and assistance in facilitating the public forums. - What is the role of the Town of Vail staff in the Lionshead Redeve/opment Master Planning process? Staff from the Community Development Department, Public Works/Transportation Department and Fire Department, as well as the Community Information Office and the Town Attorney, will work closely with Design Workshop and the community. The Town's project manager for Lionshead Redevelopment is Susan Connelly, Community Development Department Director, (970) 479-2140. How will the "Stage Two Wish List" work? As part of the public input component of the master plan process, interested members of the community will be encouraged to provide to the planning and design team their own ideas for development or redevelopment in the study area. The public's ideas will be solicited through surveys, public forums and an Internet web site at http://vail.neUlionshead. The suggestions from the pubtic will then be tested by the design team for viability and practicality. Those ideas which are approved by the Town Council will be included in the development of alternatives for the master plan. a IYNYGat i6 ~ ~~ve ide6`~ ~ perform0ng a/6s cen6ery yout9tl cP.n6ery conIerence center or some other amenity thaf wouid be suited for L?onshead? Is this the geme and/or place to s9vare those thoughts? The Stage Two "wish list" is the pertect time to share all ideas that will help achieve the six policy objectives and urban design principles that will guide the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan process. Those ideas will be solicited between March 4 and April 1. Haw we11 adl thes daga and enput be coordinated and processed9 . Design Vllorkshop and the Town of Vail staff are the coordinators and facilitators of the master plan process. Wel7 the study focus on 6nd6viduad properties9 All the properties within the study area will be individually reviewed and analyzed as they relate to the existing zoning, existing regulatory constraints and opportunities, existing conditions and configuration, and how they are affected by the design goals of the design alternatives to be developed in Stage Three. It is too early in the process to anticipate which properties will receive further design or analysis or what those alternatives might 6e. Wi4l ghe Master Plan force me to do arrything v+rith my L?onshead property? No requirements will be imposed upon property not otherwrise seeking development or redevelopment approval. The master plan will serve as a tool to achieve the six community policy objectives adopted by the Town Council. fVew or revised development regulations may be adopted to achieve implementation of those desired goals, and it is possible that incentives for redevelopment may be adopted. Will fhe Masger Plan dicgate the builcling height of afl propert6es 9 While building height regulations are both a constraint and an opportunity, it is too early in the process to know exactly what changes to existing regulations wrill occur, if any. PNe9l techneca9 informat6on be aeraiBab9e for enalevidua9 projects? Yes, all mapping, data and other tangible information will become the property of the Town of Vail and made available to the public. Shou6d I paat my 6nd6~~dua6 redevelaprnerrt p/ans on hold? That is an individual decision, however, after the adoption of the master plan in late 1997, there may be significant opportunities for redevelopment which are not allowed under existing statutes, covenants and regulations. Are you envo0ving major property owners9 All Lionshead property owners are encouraged to be involved in the master plan process with the same enthusiasm and tenacity. iVo particular owners have been singled out. Many owners already have participated and have expressed keen interest in continuing their involvement. r ' . How much /and does Vail Associates own within the sfudy area? Vail Associates owns approximately 28 acres within the 154-acre study area. The study area is bounded on the north by I-70, on the east by Middle Creek (west of the Vail Valley Medical Center), on the south by the Town of Vail boundary (south of Forest Road, and not including single-family lots), and on the west by Red Sandstone Creek (east of the Glen Lyon Office Building). What is the cost of the Lionsheaal Redeve/opment Master P/anning process and how are those costs divided betvereen the Town of Vail and Vail Associates? The budget for the work program prepared by Design Workshop, Inc. is approximately $400,000 to be divided evenly between the Town of Vail and Vail Associates. Additional sums may be spent by the Town, VA or other interested parties for feasibility studies. Is it ever too /ate for my participation and involvement? There will be opportunities for public education and input within each of the five stages of the Redevelopment Master Plan process, but for greatest impact, we encourage you to get involved early on. To find out how, call Suzanne Silverthorn in the Town of Vail Community Information Office at (970) 479-2115. 2/97 Prepared by the Town of Vail Community Information Office (970) 479-2115 0 /d e4 TOWN OF YAIL 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 MED9A ADVISORIf - February 5, 1997 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office ilA0L TOWN (COUNCIL HIGHLIGF@TS FOR FEBRUARY 4 lNork Sess'soov Braefs Council members present: Armour, Foley, Ford, Jewett, Johnston, Navas --Site Visit and Discussion of Flaum SDD In preparation for the evening meeting, the Council visited the site of a proposed Special Development District which would allow for property on Buffehr Creek Road to be subdivided into three single-family lots. The property is currently vacant and is comprised of two duplex lots. For details, see evening meeting briefs. --Request by Vail Village Commercial Property Owner's Association Representing the newly-formed Vail Village Commercial Property Owner's Association, Rod Slifer asked Council members to consider three requests: 1) to provide free parking in the Village structure from 3 p.m. to 7 a.m. for the remainder of the ski season (to be actively marketed by the membership); 2) to proceed with heating and paving of Bridge Street and portions of Gore Creek Drive and Hansen Ranch Road; and 3) to consider placement of a 10th Mountain Division soldier in Seibert Circle as part of the Art in Public Places project. Following Slifer's presentation, other members of the audience, including Joe Staufer and Jack Curtin, told of the need to stimulate business in the Village and to regain Vail's competitive edge. The free parking proposal, they said, would provide a tool to bring people back to town, vuhile heated pavers would provide a long overdue improvement to the public areas. Staufer also expressed concerns that Adventure Ridge, the mountaintop operation managed by Vail Associates, was jeopardizing the community's ability to stimulate sales tax collections (mountain operations are exempt from the town's sales tax). Also appearing before the Council vuas Stan Cope, a member of the Vail Tomorrow Building Community team, who said the free parking offer would help make Vail the "friendly" place it used to be. The speakers acknowledged the town's current program of free three hour parking upon entry into the structures between 6 and 9 p.m. has not been effectively marketed. Other speakers on the topic included: Pepi Gramshammer, who asked, among other things, that a statue of Pete Seibert be placed in Seibert Circle, calling the 10th Mountain Division soldier concept inappropriate for Vail; Ron Riley, who suggested (more) RECYCLEDPAPER TOV Council Highlights/Add 1 creating "hassle free" programs such as valet parking to attract customers; Jim Lamont, who predicted that free parking after 3 p.m. would not only revive business, but would help retain quality employees who work in Vail; and Pepi Langegger and Hermann Staufer, who both suggested the community pull together to work collectively on the commerce issue. In response to the Seibert Circle art piece request, Nancy Sweeney, Art In Public Places (AIPP) coordinator, said the group learned early on in the process that Pete , Seibert didn't want the artwork to reflect his likeness. Seibert simply asked that his son Calvin, an artist from New York, serve on the jury to help select the art work. AIPP received 700 inquiries and 80 proposals from design teams interested in creating the art piece. The jury has since narrowed the proposals to 5 semi-finalists. Each will receive a$2,500 stipend from AIPP to develop their design proposals. The designs will then be publicly displayed March 20, with recommendations from the AIPP 7-member jury to follow. In response, George Knox and other members of the audience asked that the opinions of the surrounding neighborhood be strongly considered during the selection process. The final selection will rest with the Town Council. In response to the expanded free parking proposal, Council members said they understood the issues brought forth by the association, but expressed concern about how to fund such a program. The town owes $12 million in debt service payments on the parking structures between now and the year 2012. Sybill IVavas suggested exploring a program that would reward skiers with free parking if they didn't leave the structure until 8 p.m. She also said the Adventure Ridge attraction is an amenity that helps visitors choose Vail as a destination. Perhaps, she said, the Village and Lionshead cores need to create more "sizzle" to increase foot traffic. Michael Jewett said he supported the need to look at creative alternatives, noting that he supported a reduction in parking rates during the budget process. Paul Johnston said he, too, would support expanded free parking if the program is shared jointly with the community and is well thought out. Assistant Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer said she would be contacting members of the audience to identify the target market for such a program. Although such a program will not be implemented this season (it takes up to 4 weeks alone to re-program the parking rate computers), Council members agreed to increase marketing of the current free evening parking program and asked members of the association to do the same. --Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement In preparation for the evening meeting, the Council heard an update on the appraisal for the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement between the Town and the U.S. Forest Service. Town Attorney Tom Moorhead said the Rockledge Road parcel to be acquired by the town is continuing to-receive attention by the Forest Service, the Town and Vail Associates. Issues include a request by the Town to reconfigure the property lines and a request by Vail Associates to add a covenant to the property for snowcat access and snowmaking. Because the Forest Service appraisal is for the price of a single family lot ($2.4 million), Moorhead said the tUwn's interest is to retain the value of the lot with no covenants. The town intends to acquire the property and sell it to adjacent property owners who have encroachments on the property. Following the discussion, the (more) TOV Council Highlights/Add 2 Council voted 6-0 to approve a motion to accept the final appraisal for the properties to be included in the exchange. For additional details, please see evening meeting briefs. --Review Public Process for Public Works Seasonal Housing The Council approved components of a public process for design and construction of seasonal housing at the Public Works site north of the golf course. A problem/opportunity statement and a list of seven givens were approved to provide a framework for the process. The givens, as approved, are: . 1. Seasonal housing will be built on the Public Works site to fulfill a requirement of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. P? building permit must be issued by July 31, 1997, to fulfill this requirement. 2. The project is intended to address the housing needs of Town of Vail seasonal wage earners and other critical governmental employees. 3. Given that employee housing is one of the top priorities of the community and that availability of land is one of the most significant constraints to the development of affordable housing, this opportunity will be optimized. Actual density on the site will be determined through the conditional use process, based on the analysis of site constraints, the recommendations of staff and the development team, and with input from the community. 4. Although the existing berm along I-70 screens much of the Public Works day-to-day operations, some or all of the housing may be visible above the existing berm after construction. 5. All parking for the housing development will be provided on-site. 6. The site is zoned General Use and the proposed housing must be approved as a Conditional Use by the Planning and Environmental Commission. The Design Review Board must approve the design of the building(s) and the site plan. 7. Use of manufactured housing may be considered as a cost effective alternative for this site. All construction will be consistent with the Town's Municipal Code and the Uniform Building Code, including the design review guidelines as enforced by the Design Review Board. The public process schedule will include an open house for the community on Feb. 17 to review two conceptual design alternatives by the design-build team of Mark Donaldson and Viele Construction. The schedule also includes a work session with the Town Council and public meetings with the Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board. If the project is approved, construction could begin in June with occupancy by Dec. 1. For additional details, contact Andy Knudtsen in the Community Development Department at 479-2440. --Review and Discussion of Vail Recreation District Master Plan, 1997-1999 Council members shared their comments on the Vail Recreation District Master Plan. The comments will be fonwarded to the VRD by Council members Rob Ford and Kevin Foley. (more) J TOV Council Highlights/Add 3 --Information Update Council members received the following information: • The town's proposed consulting contact with Design Workshop, Inc. for the Lionshead redevelopment master planning process will be added to the Council packet Feb. 7 for review. The Council will be asked to authorize the town manager to sign the contract. • A presentation on the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) study will be presented to the Planning and Environmental Commission on Monday, Feb. 17. • Final sales tax collections for 1996 show collections totaling $13.7 million, up 5.2 percent from 1995 collections. • A discussion on Vail Village Club construction compliance has been scheduled for the Feb. 11 work session. • Beginning Thursday, Vail Associates will begin providing transportation between Vail and Breckenridge. The cost is $5 round trip with loading and unloading occurring at Lion Square Lodge. --Council Reports Rob Ford distributed results of a patron survey developed by the Bravo! Colorado Music Festival. Ford, noting that Bravo will be experiencing changes in its leadership soon, suggested the town may need to take a proactive stance in retaining Bravo's presence in Vail. Kevin Foley said the Art In Public Places Board will hold a meeting on Thursday. ' --Other Following a recommendation from Town Attorney Tom Moorhead, the Council voted 6-0 to approve a motion waiving any potential conflicts associated with Attorney Barney White's continued representation of Lodge Tower. White had previously represented both the Town and Lodge Tower in litigation on the exchange parcel. White will now represent Lodge Tower independently. Moorhead also said a decision by Judge Jones is expected at the end of February following a two-day trial in Eagle County District Court last week over the Lodge Tower expansion. Kevin Foley noted the recent letter to the editor criticizing in-town bus service. He said he talked with Mike Rose, transit manger, who said changes are already underway to improve service. Those changes include adding more buses and more shifts to the in- town route, and increased checks and balances to time the routes and improve spacing of the buses. Noting the ease with which the Vail Village Commercial Property Owners Association was able to be placed on the Council's agenda, Foley said he was interested in making sure the Council's agenda process allowed other groups or individuals to have the same ability to be heard. That led to a discussion of the need for additional orientation (more) 0 TOV Council Highlights/Add 4 for incoming Council members and possibly adoption of a code of conduct for Council members that would address communications channels and other protocol issues. Town Attorney Tom Moorhead agreed to research the issue. Bob Armour announced a Colorado Association of Ski Towns meeting scheduled for March 18. Because that would conflict with the Council's regular evening meeting, the Council agreed to explore options at an upcoming session. Also yesterday, Council members asked Nioorhead to draft an ordinance on proof of automobile insurance that would allow violators to be prosecuted in municipal court rather than county court. Evenung Sessoon Bruefs Council members present: Armour, Foley, Ford, Jewett, Johnston, iVavas --Citizen Participation _ There was no citizen participation. --Consent Agenda The Council voted 6-0 to approve four items on the consent agenda, including second reading of an ordinance to allow van storage/transportation related businesses in designated zone districts. --Flaum Special Development District The Council voted 6-0 to approve first reading of an ordinance creating a Special Development District for property owned by Jim and Ronna Flaum. The SDD will allow the site, currently consisting of two duplex lots, to be subdivided into three single-family lots. In granting approval, with 9 conditions added by the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Council also supported the additional condition that one employee housing unit be required for the property. Also during discussion, Council member Sybill IVavas suggested bear proof trash containers be added to the approval. Council members will consider the bear proof container issue upon second reading of the ordinance. Also last night, Councilman Paul Johnston vuondered if the town should create a policy requiring all new homes to provide bear proof trash containers. For additional information on the SDD, contact Dominic Mauriello in the Community Development Department at 479-2148. --Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement The Council voted 4-2 (iVavas, Johnston against) to approve an alternate list of properties to be included in the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement between the town and the U.S. Forest Service. Originally, the town was hoping to acquire 14 like-valued properties totaling 77 acres from the Forest Service in exchange for 4 Town of Vail properties totaling 82 acres. But because of a$1 million difference in the appraised value of the proposed land exchange (with the town's acquisition totaling (more) . • TOV Council Highlights/Add 5 $5.5 million compared to $4.5 million for the U.S. Forest Service), the town is now faced with eliminating two or more of its selected properties to create a balanced exchange. During discussion, Russell Forrest, the town's project manager, presented , two alternatives. One would eliminate three parcels, while maintaining the two West Vail parcels which have drawn neighborhood opposition. The other would eliminate three parcels, including one of the West Vail parcels. During discussion, the Council heard from three West Vail residents who opposed inclusion of both West Vail parcels (citing traffic concerns) unless the i:own guarantees the land will be preserved as open space. Council members indicated a separate process would be needed if the town wanted to develop the properties for a park or affordable housing. In the end, a Council majority voted to support the option that would eliminate the Garmish site in West Vail while retaining the second West Vail parcel near the Town Manager's house, elimination of parcel H in East Vail, as well as I-70 right of way west of Bighorn Creek. Next steps include a Feb. 11 work session to review a draft exchange agreement; an evening meeting on Feb. 18 to consider a resolution to direct the town manager to sign the exchange agreement and to consider first reading of an ordinance that would provide the authority to convey the town-owned land in the exchange to the Forest Service; and an evening meeting on March 4 to consider second reading of the ordinance. Other actions that would be required after the exchange include annexation/de-annexation hearings and zoning hearings. For more information, contact Forrest in the Community Development Department at 479-2146. UPCOflAING DISCUSSION TOPBCS February 11 Work Session Georgie Manzanares 10 Year Anniversary PEC/DRB Review Contract Review for Public Works Seasonal Housing Discussion of Design Workshop Contract Agreement for Lionshead Master Planning Review Draft Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement Vail Village Club Construction Compliance Review Update of Current Progress of PEC Review of GRFA Study February 18 Work Session Discussion of Ford Park Management Plan Site Visit and Discussion of Ordinance No. 4, SDD Austria Haus Discussion of the Density for the Public Works Seasonal Housing Development February 18 Evening Meeting First Reading, Ordinance No. 4, SDD Austria Haus Second Reading, Ordinance No. 2, SDD Flaum Resolution to Execute Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement Presentation of Ford Park Management Plan , 0 TOV Council Highlights/Fldd 6 February 25 VI/ork Session PEC/DRB Review Vail Youth Auvard # # # . . RECEIVE0FF~.,,..3 ~ lEagle Valley ]E'amaly cc'enter Meetgn . January 14,1997 g . : . . Members present: Millie Hamner Jim Himrnes I{athleen Forinash Ruth Walker , T u W thard Candy Hodgkins . olin-Brown Rob Nebgen Meeting called to order. , . . . - , Pass. around mailing lisf for corrections. . : " - . ~ Approval of minutes motion by Ruth, "second b - y Millie. , . . . Treasurer's Report from opening. Several outstanding c invoices. $23,788,01. hecks. Contact Pathways Group for Note that Ry spent some time at the end of the suminer vvith attorneys and did not recomriiend the purchase of insura.nce. prepared a memo to that effect. Cand res understood that but felt the necessity to do it anyway, y ponded that the board Networlung _ 45 minutes please. _ Jim and Martha Thornton received the Vail Associates • . Ski pass. . Holly Tagnafll - CSU Cooperative Extension- Childhood . O Region to be implemented in the next year. Interest expressed b1~ Pl~ °f work for Northwest and school district. _ y Health and Hum . an services Candy Hvdbl,[;ns 7 PM n - ~'alor,ado Wes¢ o., . . Eagle Facili I~#a1 ~YeaH¢h _ Feb. 13 - 5 i ty. Formed a Eagle County Detox Task group, Law enforceinrent, e~ hQ1'S~ mental ~t hthe -ea1th - -p P~~ social services... Does not cutrently continue funding to benefit.the kids. i is peer pressure - have an effective m e t h o d s i n c e c ount Y has grown. Wants to approach,.; t~~~ m u nicipa lities for fundin One of g g e s t f a c t o r s ~ I ! g. A variety of approaches b e i n g c o n s i d e r e d. Jirn Himmes - Meet ghe Wifldeaness - Battle Mountain Hi h S ol , high school. Snowshoe trip for middle school (Eagle and IVlinturn adventure ro r value of what Jim does for families. Evidence of success - At 'sk p g~ing ~t 50°a improvement in attendance and rad ~~illie added about the . g es as weli as decreas el students kids participating - audience. Staff goes in every two weeks. Kathleen added tliat n referrals to principals " ViRAP project might be able to lanuary 14, 1997 General Membership Meeting Minutes 1 ~ t 1 ~ • , i i et The Wilderness. Lots of involvement with the schools. send kids to Me School District - Kids more difficultWhat to Meet the lds that Millie Hamner - Eagle CountY decid meet with success in school have greater self-~ la ~ess experi n ee Wildemess takes kids get out of the Meet the month. ' ai n will begin (internally) this board members 1997 United Way camp g Ry Southard - United ~'~'aY ' 3 and otentially related agencies. Group le of months.. Allocation Committee Kick off Selection process wi11 begin for 501(c) P will be contacting agencies dunnS the next coup activities. Halfway thru the Mintum for another parcel• EVFC-listed canpaign. How will interfac a~o dable housang and negotiating Center PUD - has 10 units of lied for grant from Robert Woods Johnson Foundation to . 4 in a Colorado Bar publication. App _ 16 heQ1th care cooperative . Should hear in next couple of months. . deve p a a Gnef education program ,~.v, . Lori Ruth Walker - Mountaim Hospice - Hoaglund will be o enn 'n refri erator in case medical people need to com on deatli all g _ Also brought Vials For Lifee1P1n~ ~o with Ruth and Candy to discuss educatin ages. Kathleen requested g g gether and dying and use of Hospice. hone lines in preparation for resource : Rob Nebgen - TRC - Expanded office space. Added 7 p min as o t h e r o p t i o n s. New telephone system e 9 P M o n F rid a y Jan.17• : and referral line as well for Rob at Eagle-V ail pavilion 7 board. itation in mail for welcome partY advisory boards into sync wrth ~'~'OT~ng ~ough ~ Inv with other agencies. Bring Also networking atch. EVFC and TRC working I Vic t i m I m p a c t P anel is part onTRc t e ly in eg d P ast i ssues. CORRA is has assistant training• come to do issues and things are happe~ g P~ s volunteer. Janet KinneY Jodie Dennis is w ro ram orking as and Amennow corP taken on CORRA ~ ~ coordinator. Malcing ' coordinator with Buddies p S o~g on ~ CORR-A• es so t h a t i n f ormed of what' s g . administrative chang et ready for - rown -Headstart /CPP - Headstart self-assessment this week. To g Tsu Wolm B federal review in May 12-17. ,t.. S _.wR9:15 every we~?esday at Mount of p,p project is going along - Kathleen ]Forinash -HH ost office - Mid to late om or circuit rider's room. New Avon offi ainatord primarily for seniors:-;-~: Holy Cross Ro a volunteer coor February ~1l open staff of nine . Hlring Interviews start soon. school and family l~ng on opening Future agenda item -.Archdiocese - Catholic Church P ect and the name• Ruth ~11 contact f:. center. Would like to have come speak about plans for. proj . L. Michael W asmer. V oted to' r. . ' ~ . ested that we register our name v~n~ ~e state to somewhat protect nam • Ry sugg 2 . . r`. . . . ]anuary 14, 1997 Minutes ' General Membership Meeting - . f,.. - t. . ~ register name. Volunteered to help Candy with paperwork. Gatelkeeper's ¢x¢rcuse - Identify core areas of service and identify basic target groups - cross reference. Take look at basic areas. One agency to take lead and call meeting to discuss what resources are available, make definition of what's available, who are players, and how do they want to respond to questions and issues. Will differ in each group depending on capacity and what screening questions to ask before send to group. January 14, 1997 General Membership Meeting Minutes 3 ~ ' • I~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ µ ~f I 1 " . . , . : . . . . i ~ ; , ~ .T , °,i ` Q • , ~ , ~ ' i~ ~ • ~ s ° ~ ` a.' ~ ? ~ `k~^ ~ ~ - : ' - ~ ~ r ! ~ ~ J~ ' " ? / ...r__- ~ . ! ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ . ' i i•,~ - • ' F. ~l~~~. Fg74~~~7~ : V . i.~~ ~w r..` -~:~7 . . ' ~ y~q' ~ 3- ' . , • ' ~ ~ ~ e~ .~Y± - 2 ~ •r - ~9 t '_l. i , 4 ~ ~ , ~ k~~s j, a~4 ~sw ~ t~~' ~.g'- ~ . i.~;~~ i a i` C` ~ „ ~ ~ , • 1 °,a . ~ ~ {I~-+ t' r ~ s V. Hf , hv ~mldv~.~. "w'~~ ~ ~ a w ~ ~ „wti, C~~ ~ ` ~ ~p• , ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~~e: u~ r~ ' p I I p ~od~ P ~ i ~~a ^'~•r 'I I ~ ~ d' , a- ~t..~~• f e ~ f, r . I' , N„ I ~ ~ ~ C. - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , _ . i _ . . . . . EAGLE VALLF:Y FAtvIILY CEN7'ER - PpC+. BQX 3098 AVOI`1, CU 81{620 2-05-1997 3: 36PM FROM CURT I N H I LL 970 476 0269 P. , ' . . _ .XC.: _ ~~~tt,.tvc.~.(- . Q : 00 000004000 000000 a000 0 0 0 00000 0@000 900egmO 000 0 0 a cove~A~ o o = o o O O O O p O p O O O ~ ~ ~ ~~~GEj O p M1LE1RCH~T ' - p O ~ ' • p ^ ~ AS~~CIATI ~ . o . 0 O ' O O d ~ . O o o o o o ~ ~eclneSda37y ~~bruary 12 0 o p o 8e30 A-M - o ~ o a CO Skg Museum - o o. o 0 o 0 o 0 0. o ~ m o - a a o . o 0 0- o ~ o ~~Teeds f~°om the T"own of ~'ail ~1997 0. o ° offi - ° t~ flpr4ve COncli$gOYYS o : o . o 0 0 - $o ~"eI~e~°~.te S~eS ~ o 0 ° m $o make A$ easger buSlY1ieSS ° o a o . - o O . p_ O ~~~mer ~~entS ~ . . O ~ dYSCuSsIloBY ' - _ . . . o , - o o o , . . _ .o o , , o o ~ Fx°e~ Parking between f e OO~in-9.o 00pm o o . . o Q o _ . a o o . . . _ . ~ . _o o o o . o 0 0 0 o 0 0 a . o. 0 . - o 0 o o . a. 0 . a d o o _ - o 0 0 RECEIVEO FEB 3 1997 THE A. D January 29, 1997 CHANNEIL° Bob Armour, fViayor Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Bob, Thanks so much for taking time out of a busy schedule to work writh our crew last week. It was great meeting you, and it's our pleasure to be assisting the town of Vail. I firmly believe that once we get up and going on the cable system, the visitors and residents of Vail will find us an important benefit to the area. Our programming has been so well received in our other markets, that the chamber - and city officials say they can't imagine not having us as part of their cable television service!" As we discussed, we have been negotiating with Fred Lutz for several months regarding our placement on TCI's system, and we remain optimistic that February will be our month. Any encouragement you might provide from an official perspective will be greatly appreciated. Oftentimes a letter from the mayor, town manager, or other local officials is all it takes to persuade the cable operator to add the senrice. ; Thanks again-for your support! ; r Sincer ~ ~ , ~ G~ t ess; Vice President T e Vacation Channel, Inc. - 282 VVintergreen Itoad P.O. Box 4745 Branson, MO 65616 o Eureka Springs, AR o Breckenridge, CO 80424 (417) 334-1200 (501) 253-9676 (970) 453-0230 , , y@ : . . . . g~ ~ . . • . ' r. Tp • : ( l~~ 0 . WN OFVA%Y, ~ InFut/InnquixY Response Record . The attached co=ents tivege gecentIy geceived by gtte Tovvn af VaiL We encourage Vay gesicients and guests to give us such inptttt and w+e stive for Umej ADDRESS COIIRI' TI.SE COI~TS y~p ~ yYO~fG DAYS A D~nRMMN s ~S _ LETE1J F0RM TO PAl,t BRANDMEYEIL . D EPAR a ~N T'OHA.~~I,E INQUlRY ~ ENDIeIIDUAL ?'0 HALNDLE INQUIZY tt-d, ` DAT°E TOVIZECErVED ZMJT/INQLIR1' _ ~6 •k7 . , . ~ . . . 'I°YI'F OF INPLj7/N0Mv PHONc CALI. (indicate date).. . . . Lt_ 1 t: (at,~Ghed) 1~ @ : ~U~1t~1,E, ~C•17 rll• ) a . R~, ONSE CARD (ai-tac.ed) . . TY?'F OF RFaaN~ Ici~e~~c on~1: ' . . . I.E:~I""r1Z (attach copy) _ . PHQNE CALI. (indicate date) . _ ~ SL7M1~f,~ RY OF RF.~PO~t~ a rr.rn~r~oie ' . , Dc1 c OF RESPONSC FOIZM ?ZEIMN-ED BY DFI'AR a~- -r TO PAtbq BRAINMEYI_--;~L- ' A eooy oi thiY irtquiry and Eoren wiil reersain on BIe at tl:e i0 V~mUnity Rclations oF$M ,q$ iom 42 Ulis farm is retuned ,,o?= Htsndtneyer, this inquiryaill be considated dosed. . =CR VC!.'7 '•''-LC'! :i~~~,:., f ^±c- ~e --r - _ . _ . . ~ _ mtUEIVED FEg 5 1997 PETER J. FURSTENBEIZG 6420 EAST BERRY AVENUE ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 Mr. Tom Moorhead Mr. Russell Forrest Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 February 3, 1997 Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter of January 14 which was responding to my letter of November 12, 1996. The ground you refer to as "Rarcel D" I assume is that parcel labeled "S-10" on the exchange map you sent last October - i.e. the 4+ acres on the South side of Ptarmigan Road. As I look at the whole situation involving a 75 and 80 acre exchange, I still would appreciate an answer to my main question which you neglected to answer. To quote from my last letter: Regarding the "Financial Partnership" I have several questions. (1) What "Financial Partnerships" are being proposed for the other areas, specifically S-1, S-2, S-5, S-9, S-11, S-13, and S-14, all of which seem to adjoin other residential areas? (2) If S-10 the only area being singled out for "Financial Partnership", who decided it, and on what basis is it justified to single out this one parcel? I definitely believe that the open space should be acquired by the Town of Vail as a whole. The idea that adjoining landowners should have to buy specific parcels of public land under threat of development and then donate same to the Town is intimidating. I will appreciate hearing from you. Yours truly ~ ~ / ~ ~ , Peter. J. F rstenberg ~ (1130 Ptarmigan Rd.) CC: Town Council / fi 77-~ ( ,~a 3 , 7-1-3 ~ ~t 7 i 1 mil i ` DU ,f ( AsF,,A Tm k E-K-LY- I i ~ . V-1 . l~ ,i d t ~s . y.l O~ r ~ j ; I ~F ! t F k C~ , l ~ . w; . . . . . z.~.~ . . . . . ~ v: . . . . _ . _ . . . . . _ _ _ ~ . . _ _ . . .~.'a'-'w c a ~ ~,.,,z. :.L.. . _ . . . . _ - ' • - - . AsPen blEs Wma.v ~ Corer Ston' ~ _ - T A,~~DA - . . ' '""~:a$`" P3' ~ ~ • er ~qk ,Fx ~ ~ g~aY , ~ : ~t4~ ~ • ( ' ' ~ . , , . . s -~-t ~~.;r• t , ~i, . % ~1 _,TV~ ~~r ~~°.i"+~Tr ` ~v 5 1.'`~ kP. 1 '°s~...fl,•~ ^e ~ , 4.. Heather Trish is oite of the shrinking number of local worAers deter- mined ro stick it out despite the difficulties ojfindirtg hausrng in the ~ upper Roaring Fork Vallev. Devon Mever,r phnto. ~ Cover illustration by Roy Willey. ~m ~ By Melissa Schmitt missing a whole lot of rungs - Aspen Times Sto(f Writer right down a[ the bottom. So, OK, you're in your late There's "affordable housing" 20s. You've got a pretty - but vou can't afford it. good job. Yodre living in "It's been one of the most crit- Aspen and you want to ical issues for the last 20 years," stay here. Aspen Mayor John Bennett said Not stay "for the season." Not earlier this week. 'This question 1 stay "for a couple of years, 'til strikes at the very heart of what a it's time to go back to the `real community is all about." w°dd. ' Pitkin Counry Cortunissioner You want to stay for Mick Ireland said when he was real, to keep [hat pretry washing dishes at the Mother good job (and maybe find Lode in the early 1980s, he was - a better one some day), ro making $9 or 0 an houc Today, build a life righ[ here. the Mother Lode's dishwasher is But firs[, you need a making $7 per hour, he said. place to live. At the same time, the price of Not a place to crash. propeny has gone through the Not an aparunent where rooE 'Ihe dishwashers, with their you share the rent with shrinking salaries, have been left three other people you behind. And so have a lot of just met last week in a other people. In the 1980s, the bar. cost of P~vPenY in Aspen went so ro A place to live. A high that not even those once place to build that Gfe. considered well off could afFord Everyone official tell to buy a home here. you this: You'ne exacdy Doctors and lawyers aze com- - what this community muung many miles to work in wants and needs. Aspen. But the financial mali- "I dare say the bank president ties of the Aspen ama are can't afford housing in Aspen ° sending a different mes- any more than the local restaurant sage: Lots of luck dishwasher," said Bennett. Despite the official As a result, in tecen[ years the . proclamations of the Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Aspen Area Community plan, Authority has had to find a way despite some pretty genuine to cmate housing for a populadon efforts over the years and even that had in the past been able to despite the existence of a sub- fend for itself. ' stantial quantity of official But that has meant that most . "affordable housing," the Iceal of the affordable housing that housing ladder still seems [o be ¦ corK/nued on /ollowing page - - ° - - - - - - - r J ,1-4-A The Aspen Trmes • SoNrday-Sunday, Febniary 1-2, 1997 ? cant/nued Irom prev/ous page egories 1 and 2, he said, is because the coun- ; gets built is affordable for the doctors and ty required it be as part of the Maroon Geek lawyers and bank presidents - and cenainly approvals. '~o~ not affordable for the dishwashers, wairers Another, related economic factor is also at ~~~h do~s and waivesses or even for city planners. work, said Mick Ireland. Y~u In the 1980s, due to a wide variety of fac- " - Last weeA, Historic Preservation Officer AStor~the rich got richec Property values in it ~.a1 j~, cost!" Amy Amidon announced her resi nation n soared, but the personal wealth of the from the city of Aspea g people buying those properties rose even Amidon, 27, resi ned her more quickly. € post after four ln ihe past, people had purchased second ~t does i1 actuaflY take to buy an •`affordable" hous- great years, she said, because she simply homes on the West End and then rented them 1II° unit? couldn't get ahead in Aspen. Even earning out to pay their mongaee. How much cash do you nced in hand to close the deal? what some would call a preny goal salar}, - "77iey bought it and rented it out [o peo- How much money do you need tn earn each month to pay $37.235 per year. ple like you and me and Amy Amidon,,, lre~e ~rtgage? "Aspen has its little swggles; " she said. land said. We11, if you'te lucky enou¢h [o find a one-txdmora, , "And wst of living is one of them." But in the '80s people were so wealthy Categ°n` 2unit- about as cheap as they come- you'll ~ The decision io they began paying cash for those homes. °eed to eome up with abcwt $4,000 caSh up-fmnt. Md leavc was not an Theydidn'tneedren[ers.andthateliminated YW'llneedtobeearningabout$20.000 ayear . easy one. Any con- locals' accest to that rype of housina. The numbers o u ~•ersation about her departure leaves Amidon _ S P- way up -£rom there, fighting back tears. As Historic Preservation ` Amy Amidons can't compete," Ire- • At the top.end, a twabedroom Category 4 unit, for ~ land said. example. ypu'll need to have about $10.000 c;ash up frpnL Officer, she spent years fightim' to preserve That trend also had ;uiother effect. And you'll need to be earnung more than gso ppp avear. the city's charactec Bu[ now she's going to The West Fnd used to be home to the Heie'?re how some of the numbers woric out. have ro Ieave that ch:vacter behind. ~ skilled protessionals or business owners The foliowing ca1¢ulations are hated on Pitkin County She lovet Atpen, she said, but there are makin` S100 pp0 or more per year. Some of Bank S fimt-dme home-buyer's Pro=ram, which requires a other things to consider. thosc people still Iive therc. Ireland said. Bu[ lowervthan-average S percent down .`I ln throwino money to the wind right p~yment. ' when those houses are finally sold, they Accotg to the bank's Scott Garcia, the numbers now for rent. You're supposed to be saving wodt be sold to those same professionals or bejOW an a 30-year nx~rt`age at 8 pement inter- money at this a_e but you can't bccause you business on~ners. Which means that even ' can nevcr get ahcad," she said. est. more of the top-income "housing poor" will The ~9u~ ~~mesare calculated on the assumpport "We're all feeling the same thing." she be looking to the housing authority for PaYR'ent is your on~y req~~ ~onUily s.ud. "You ask `can 1 realiy do this? Wouldn't affordablc homes. , ~ymenL 9 it be easier to live someplace that doesn't have all these sWggles'?' What concerns me x- Total housing payments can be;u high as 42 peicent of is we're going to end up missing a generation HOW re~~~c ~ Cat 1? youi gmss monthly inrnme, said Gacri~ However, the in this town becacse they never had a chance ~ere is no Categoq~ I sale housing, con- °f `al ~t ~ym~~ -~using plus, for example, [o get a foothold in the door at our a e~d ceded Housing Director Dave Tolen this student loans, car paymenGS and credit card debl - can_. they lefr.,, g w~A. "7~here is a cortroversover whether of your tnonttily inrome. Cat 1 housing should be ownership or not. ; Nlont}ily°houun a ~y~~~~ Some say that $35,000 is way too little that g g~nts used below include - in i - adch6on to the mottgage itseif,- nn estimated,condo- , • ~ ~ ~b°lm' those people should be rentin I don t ha a The housing authority now Iis[s some g p.Y~nt`~d:Fn~atemortgageinsurance. I,500 units in Categories 1 throu h 4, and ~n to agree.^ ~ y (PM~ ~ ^ some Resident Occupied homes. g In addition, Tolen said, it is the most diff That list includes both rental unit5 and so- ' wlt to p~luce. C3tegoty 2, One,bixlrppm, ~ " "Are we ever going to be able to do Bene- N@ £ f called "sales" units, the units [hat ~ ~ ~ ~4 2~ people can buy, the key to building Down a nal communiry. ~ P?5'ment $3,700 Category 1 sells for $34,400. ~ Category 2 for $74,200 ro $84.9pp. 0 dare ~pJ tf@e ~yank pf@Se[~e61t YPaYR~~: $682 {mortgage $SI7; ~~doum Category 3 selis for $114,300 to fcr$1()D,tax$25 pML$40) 3 ~ ~ ~ $125,000. Category 4 sells for can't ~$OPd flo@95661g BD {4Spe~B ~~Y~~~`$16~~m0°~$19:485 Y+ $177,000 to $215,000. Resident Occupied (RO) units have sold for any moire thaBp thg locaQ ~ Where ~yectHopkins P ~ ' ^ ;~,R~ce $8,4900 as much as $500,000. That range seems balanced P(astaurant d9$f1y1/aShgn enough and the overall number of urtics - 1,500 - 'Loan amaunr $80 650 ,s noc negi;g;bie. - Aspen Mayor John Bennett ~~~Monthly.payment g~5j` ' But it dsn't all quite work out the (mortgage'$592,:condominium way it's supposed to; a large num- tax:$25, PMI$50) ber of those 1,500 units are clus- 82bPermonth or$11,915pei;year tered at the top end of the price ~ ~ : scale, in Category 4. Very few units are Cate- 3' O°e gory 2. None are Category 1. dict Commons at Cat 1?" Tolen said. No Benedicx Commpns That In recent years, as city and county off- Pome W ou l d be di fficult even at the cials have performed a virtual balancin act ~ate." ~;;Aowupaymenh$5,775 g The proposed Pomegranate project went ~~~0~$108,585 H. i [rying to allocate affordable housing in the in front of the housing boarcl this week for a ~ ~ Monthi ' ^ " mos[ needed categories, while at the same YPaYmenG $981 (moitgage,$796,condominium ` time ge[ting the best bang for the taxPaYer d~~sion as to what categories of housing it ; ~ ~':f~ $100, tax $u, pjy~j $bp~ would include. The board delayed the dui ;335:permond~,a$28,030peryear ' buck, Category I and 2 housing has fallen by sion for a week, saying it needed time ro the wayside. The result is, those oun digest all the information it had been given y RpeOp1e 1O°kin8 Tolen however recommended to the board ~>'~R~ ~~~5 K' o o d s ro buy a"starter uniP" -~ai f~t Nng on [hat the old Pomegranate Inn be used for Ca[ the housing ladder - are left out in the cold, e o `Atce $125;OOp , 11 shelling out some $750 a month ro share an g ry 2~d 3 sales units. ~~~+'a pa nt,$6;250 apa~vnent, Neighbors have objected, arguing for ~0 $lj8,750 µ Last year, when a Cate ~ upper-category units - if any. And senior ~ MOII~y PaY~nt: $1,(X6 (mortg~e gg71,, condotninium gory _ unit became citizens have requested that the projec[ be , N a ~'f~ $lOO,;taz $25 p11~ gqQ~ available in the West Hopkins project, [here dedicated to their needs. wereapplicationsfmm75"top-priority„resi- ' t~ ,~ifib°ft,$2•540month,.or$3p,q(pper year ; dents, people who had been in As n for at But whatever the outcome, the ~Q least four yearc. ~ Pomegranate is a perfect example of why h' 4~ hiA+'66 m Part of the problem, said Ciry Council- Category f is so hard to create, Tolen said. ~ Ce0bemit1 woman Rachel Richards, is that MPeV~_ The subsidy for the Pomegranate tn cmate P rtY Category 1 units would have been almost DONMP4311111ent $9315, ues have appreciaee,d so much over the years, $gp,pp0 per unit, he explained. "That's a that units like the one she started out in a[ the g i+oan8mounG$~76;98Q Aspen Village trailer park, are no lon er cPre~ ~ h~~y ~e question needs to ~~~Mp~~ YPaYm~ S1,503 e $1,298, condommi- affordable as staner units, g ~'e use the money a little better.T' wl'~> a~ A~. um fee $I(p, t~ g25; PIvII $80) At the same time, those ro The idea, Tolen said, is to create as rnany u~ N;~-Y utcome $3,580 per month or $42,960 k P perty values choices for as many peoPle as we can, while _ per year have bumped up the cost of producing keeping the gro wth factor in mind because obedroom ~ affordable pmjects, Richards said. ~~t~+Y 4. t~`?v ~ '7t's a tough dilemrna; ' said John Durso, ~ordable housing is gowt}~ too, he said. ; KD Housing P~ers, ~~ordable-hous- ~e p~blem, he added, is not affordabili w,..,, - 3•- ing development fum. tY, it's of availability. a'n paymeuk $9 8$0 ~ ' To build a"Cat 1-Cat 2" sales 'ect ~'`~e're still holding our heads above $187150 a ProJ water," Tolen said. "We still do have a signif ~~MD~Y $1.5~ {inortgage $1~375 .condomirii- costs the developer or local government a']~~ mount of our (worlcing cl~5) ~Pul~ ~~~~a um fee $ii~p ~erc g25 pMI,ggp~ great deal of money, he said. If it cost tion here . The o 4 $1~0,000 ro build a one-bedroom unit and it PPo~tities for tf~e futtiie, if I N;~~YN~~x $378$imondh,or$q5430perye~ gets sold as Cat I at $35,000, somebody ~ not a lot better,'aredt wocse." ; to paY ~at difference. "As a developer I just ~~f~Y a~hed' a~ lost $65.000. V?hy would I do itT, ~0 ~'a a ta~t11 fhese's a praq rWll ltanch ~ And why would ~ While'Ireland a ~ Pnce.$214799k ~ When e citY and coun do i[ 8~s there is a need for c; ~re m~ ~Y more low-end housing, he said hard work DO~ ~Y~!~ $1~ 740 rt'a"Y in~me levels? Y peoPle in need at so and sacrifice have alwa s amounC g~ ~°g '•'~aY in buildat ~e $65,000 can Aspen lifestyle. If someon~enwants it bad MOII~Y ~Y~n~ SI~34 { £ g~ndun3 and 4 units enough, fie said, they'IF find a wa fec,$100~, '~I497,condomii- Du so ist he develoPer rc of lhe ou're Y' ~]v ~s teR $25;PMI $132) Cek rental housin Y making $30,00p.$35.000 each a e;.~Y~me $41~6permonth;'oI$50,115 ? ~renUy 8 Projeci N,hMh°OD Y~' you can swing it;' he said. "Somedmes ~y~ k ~2 , °"d 2,, ~O~Ping m~its ac low `ateBories 1 i[ means anotherjob." Thes ueformahon was rov+ded > ~~eon~y~ ~S4pp And the city and county have alwa s P~CO~Y~~k. 1iY Scott Gnm/a of ~u`g _s,in* cat- lendi8 the do~wn PaYmentd, even if it means 4 ~ _ x~.~.~_ ~r; ~ ~ ~ Salurday-Sunday, Febrvary 1-2, 1997 • The Aspen Times 15-A kq"'~~..~~,,~.'+= o y'. , " ~ ~ `~..,,~c - ~ / • G~> 61'~ . k' . _ ~ .W~~ k~~ • Y° ~ i - ~ . ' ~ ~ i ~ ~ • a..:-..,.. 'a`~'~'';^ rS-: ~ . q xm ` + ' - .«xr':'S. e'• -C . v. , : "We've go6ng $o eue¢6 aega eoa6ssirag a generatoon in tBa6s toerauo because t6aegr oaeeer hae8 a chaeace 4o get a ffoo40ooBd 6oa 4Poe aUoop a4 oaor age and $hey Oeffit.,, - Amy Amidon 'I b;lieve that when people have a real stake the}''11 "But then you're just screwim: the low-income peo- make diose payments." he said. "If I'm in[erested in plz again by bumping up the prices,- she said. keeping people who are going to step in to develop a leadership role when they're 40. 1'm goinQ to give PoIMBYs them a stal:e. If we have to lend the down payment. One of the biegest obstacles affordable-housing lend the down payment." advocates face is [he neighbor who doesdt want an ~ ~ ~ And ciry and county officials are affordable-housine complex next door - especialhy working toward the creation of more when that complex is Category I and low-end housing, he said. "We incorporate it in devel- Perhaps there is no better examplz than the opposi- opment requirements. We work widi Sl:iw:" he said. tion sta¢ed against conversion of the old Pomecranate ' "That'showwedoit." to low-end housine by the neiehbors at the Pomegranate Condominiunve. Stic6ting it out Those neiehbors said earlier this year, they would ~ Heathcr Trish grew up in Aspen and said this weck setde only for Category 3 and 4 ownership units. , she intends to stay, no matter how toueh the batde. They changed their mne d'Jednesday night at a For Trish that means a full-time job as the Assistant housing meeune, sayin¢ they would accept senior citi- Direc[or of the Aspen Youth Center, work as a part- zens as neiehbors. But they remain opposed ro any time waitmss at the Canuna and weekends spent on the low-inrome projec[. mounriin as a ski inswctor. Their opposition is no[ unusual. There seems to be a Still, the housing game is frustrating. And Trish is strone neighborhood unwillingness ro accommodate , beginning to feel shejust can't win. "I've been to Alpine Banl:. I um saving. I do have a nest egg. There's no way,° she said. "Alpine Bank told me 75 percent of the wtal can "MoSt of ghem are going to vvorBe be loaned. To pwchase a unit at $175.000, which is around what mos[ of the uniLs cost, [ would ag a lg~ op, party and ge# ghe hel8 have to come up with $44,000, yeah, righL It would tal:e me another four years to save that up pu$ o-gere, ghgy aren+t g0111g to St1y and that's working three jobs and having no social fife." r And if she did come up with the down pay- ~e~~~ ment, she'd still be facing a$950 a month mort- - Heather Trish gage payment. in order to make [hat $950 per month mongage, Trish said, she would have to get married or find a roommate. "I can'c do it by myself and that's what it comes down to. My idea of affordable is rotally different " Trish is the fust to admit that at 24, she is one of any affordable-housing projut anywhere, and resis- few people her age who knows what she wants, which tance tends to be s[iffer for lowercategory projects, is a good Gfe in Aspen. Pazt of the explanation for that may be the density ` Most of rhem aie going to work as a lifr op, party issue: Given the high cost of land and the higher sub and get the hell out of here," she said. "They aredt sidy per unit required for the lowest-cost housing, one going to stay here. IPs not an option, they figme out way to make such projects work is to build more units they can't stay and they head back ro Atlanta. 'Ihey'ie to kcep the cost per unit down. not going ro stay because iPs not feasible. But theie aee other factors az work, as well. "Me peopie out theee fighting and pushing are the Bennett said earfier this week, not refemng to any people in the higher end. They're not going to say, `I specific project, that such situations concern him. want a$35,000 unit for my husband and four chil- °Iheic's an irony about affordable housing," Ben- nea said "Everyone supports it in geneml. Aspenites I have been to housing meetings and I am con- always vote for it However; when iPs next door all cerned,^ Trish continued, "but I'm a small minority. hell breaks lose. In tfuee out of four housing pmjects, Am I going to have to live in Tmscoa with papeo-thin there is general]y some neip,hboihood opposition." ' walls? Truscott is a nice place, but it's not wleie I want To compound the problem, he said, the neighbors to pucchase a home and spend the rest of my Gfe. will say, 'OK, we'll let you put affordable housing "Most of my friends aie just struggling to make rent next door but oNy if i['s category 4.' and car payments," Trish said. `°ITiey are dealing with "If I had a message it would be, lePs all Gghten up a a eoommate who moves out each season. lhey're just Gtt1e,,, he added. "lbe lower-income people are just a wonying abou[ surviving. ']'hey'te no[ woirying about much a patt of Aspen as the ms[ of Aspep. ' geaing ahead." 'People say don't want them living nezt to me if Trish said she hopes to land a starter unit, or an they oNy malce $20,000.' I huly believe thaYs short- wbeGevably cheap, beat_up 5ee_market home she can sighted," Bennett continued. "When you rule out fix up and sell for a pmfit $20,000 to $30,000 a year, you're ruling out your , "Wdliams Ranch would be great," she said laugh- young people among other things:" ing. `But they're going to look at me and say `you've "I don't see that as viable if we want to keep this got to be kidding., „ the vital, colorful, diveise place it's always been," Ben- Trish said she and a friend have talked about what nea concluded. •`qspen is not by accident a desirabie they could save for and buy togethec place to Gve. It's the mix of the mountains, the great . She knows, she said, free marice[ is a better deal ideas and the fabric of the Aspen idea. If as a commun- . because she can resell it and make a fittle money. ity we abandon our yourh, we abandon our soui." ~ - _ _ - - ~ ~ - - I I AIuAw: J' )aUL4 , p ?~.~.~a, ~ l~ ~i ~t,v G.~.~tc~ 4~:~ • • K s'' ~ .~~a ~ RECEI V ED F E B 3 1997 ~ _W. x li : 0ftiM4M/ ~ LVERTHOR~~ Vkff C O L O R A D O 601 Center Circle ~ P. O. Box 1309 ~ Silverthorne, Co~loradc~ 5049~ January 30, 1997 " Mr. Robert McLaurin . Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. McLaurin: You and all Town of Vail public officials are cordially invited to attend a seminar on Systematic Development of Informed Consent by Hans Bleiker sponsored. by the Town of Silverthorne on Friday, March 21, from 9am to Spm in the Recreation Center conference rooms. We are very excited about this one-day workshop. Hans Bleiker is a nationally known consultant who provides courses especially designed for the public-sector. We are inviting local government officials to join our Town Council, Planning Commissioners, and Department Directors in this pertinent and practical training session. I have included some flyers about the seminar as well as information from Hans Bleiker's business, the Institute for Participatory Management and Planning. The cost for this seminar is $100 per person plus $59 for training materials (materials can be shared between two people), and lunch will be provided. Seating will be limited, so please let us know as soon possible if anyone fom the Town of Vail plans to attend. You may contact me at 262-7305. We hope you can join us. Sincerely, Connie Williams ' Executive Assistant Enclosures General Government 262-7300 Fax 262-7311 Public Safety 262-7320 CommLmity Development 262-7360 Public Works 262-7340 Recreation & Culture 468-0711 r,. , t - ~ - _ x f• _ ~~~~4;~^ - _ " _ - _ `~H.~-! ~~a.-p~•~ ~ f ~i i „1 r `:`'~rn - - - iC T.,m.~~;....:. . . 5~ ti. ~ ~ v~? ~ - •.k~•^r_ - ? •r " ~ . ~~y~... fl ti . . ' _ - ^..~3.~~'t'`r .~•vT~'-s"~3SS~:~ . ~ q-Y w'£~~x .~r 2: - ~ - - ~ - - r r«~... _ _ _ _ - - " - ~.~•-1y-' -~~~~i.-~ ~ . . . . : . " _ - ' . ~ ~.t..:, ~ . _.-:.:.~:,..._r:.-.:~:~'.. :~..Y~: . . ......:."..7~.. ...s._: . ~'.::b..i t:::i, e . . . _ . . . . ~'.;i._....':., . . . . . . . .........1 ~ ~ _ . . . . . . , i . . ' ":i,.:... ~~'rJ:i . %3tS k j t L 1", . ' . . i . . . . . , . ' . . . . ~ . . . _ . . _ " _ . . . . . . . . . . _ _ ' ' " ' . . . . . . . , . , _ : ~ . - „ . . , . . . . .'r. . - PRESENT . ~ . _ - - - ~ ' ~ . ~ - = - - _ --?Srt.: - ;•;~:;~'a`,;;:'r.;: - . . . " ~ '•~G SYSTEMATIC ;DEVELOP~IfENT OF'~NFbRIIVOED ~~DN5E1?~lT - ~FRIDAY, IVIARCH 2 1~~ : s ~ ~9:00 AM - 5:0~ PIVI ' ' r ~ ° ~SILVERTHORNE RECREATIOIV,,:~ENTER , . ; - $ ~ QO PER PERSON (INCLUDES LUNCH~ . , . : - - , . , _ . . . . $ 'rJ9 FOR MATERIALS . . . " ~ - ' > : ~ - ;''z,.:~:.,.. ; . . . . . . . . . . r'~-;-' . . . . . . . . - ~ . . . . , . . - . : . . . . . . ~ - . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ , . , ~ Pi ~ - . . ~ - - - - - : . ~ , . _ ~ .:.ya , i.'•': . . . , . _ _ . . . . . . . . : ..4'' _ ' . ,~.i'....._::c'... - _ _ . . ..1 s..: ~ . . . . . . . . ...7.> _ ';~~"f: 0;., ,i.u.. _;',SPONSOREQ. BY THE TOWN OF: SILVERTHORIVE - - . . _ . . SEATING I~,~LIMITED - FOR FURTHER :DETAILS;; OR;`TO.;MAKf;r~,~:.::::;`°.';~' , _ . ; . ~ . . . . . . . : . . . . : ~ , 4 . .s2. . . . . . RESER\/~4T1O141S.CALL .2 - _ . . _ - ~ 5. . ~ . , . . _ . . : . . _ _ . . . _ _ . _ . - - - i . . . . ~ . : _ . . . . ; _ i';+.+~s . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - . . _ . . . : : ~ ~ _ . . . . _ . - , - _ . . . • : . - ~"jr:=r:~; . . . . . . . . , ' - .~..,~f " 1 ~ . < : i - - . . ' - . : . . . , . . . . - . . : , . , THE ART OF a-% . ~ c "S57gs3,4° .'a s yr ' ~ i '~1y2'-' ~F,f~C~?itiFa 1!, :h 3' v`bk`'F:~,n. . rs. ..x,~`~ _ ~ i4~~ i~y~,'~~t3' . i~ 4 s~`.. E'• t~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ a i i i . ~ ~ ~~~G~, • ~ . +3;' ~ t f'~3~. . 4,; ~ ,lxr p;., 4•t . (a~.#^~F %~'a~, ~ a~-,~~ ~~~w.~ gn ~l ~;::'~t. ,a,~,~.~-" >a;. ~:t~i. t r . :'~.i ~-r~.t •.':~''.j ~i I~£ k: ; ~~S'~ f.~ ''ri. ,~',r. . ? ` j~: k. F».~+~ 5~'.»i:'~~5~'r_.'~{e1; . ^.t,~ ~r"Fti,~~ +~1.,r t~~R~7` ~n ~~A. .i a-.~- ,il°~' ` '~'.•yF•~i ,~-r t ,.~!z".k ~ ~4' ` - .r ~ _K- ~r .1 i~y 4.,a?.~ti 7, ,"^~~,t:i ,.Sd.~'~~' 4 ~::e`A. 'YM.,: !t•:>~--y~.'~~>~.~.~t+#.~i'r~-.3,~.ti..:..~° %~i'~~?i:: sa„~,.. .A. Your rnisslon accornplished kti~yi., . Ir,C;~~ ti M'.~ w .7 .:3~ ~al~?;4 ia~A„~ + c:L,~M 'e~'.`i :~~Yh~< lJ.:'.` ~ 1 ..t*. . . ;-e ~ ;.i < ..~'r ;j~,~ j ~ ii; .."i~ .2. {;r•j .,3.. .1 r'~ ~7S:t~ Yi(r ~ 4ft{~n:fl,~7?_ ~Yr.t ~ ! ! H`~{rs` ~t ~•t~'t,,. , ~ • ~M•0.`~~ ';f;. kL~.;.4x f~ htf : ' ba,,, t f ~}q a~t . . ~ . . . - . : - ~ . t >i. , :;~qcF.~., ' 7 t ~ ~y'~ fyou're like most managers down, shelved, vetoed, compromised become very eective at impkrncmt- working in the public sector, out of shape, stopped or torpedoed ing eUerc the most contr+ar,rersial you fancl it frustratingly diffi- However, a tiny percentuge of ptqects, programs, plans and ~ czclt to get your projects managers, engineers, scieiztists and propasals zmpkwtercted. You andyour teanc other professionals never experieizce TdTd.~ee art of Coizsent-Building can consistently do a good job of this. Tbey understand the urt of be learned. The Ifzstitute for ~ planning, and yet all too oflen Consent-Building 1Ylanagers who Participatory 1Vlaiuagemetat and r . . n 7 . . . ~ ..1 1-.,....,, sl - f~,,...1 Not contrlnced? "No 1 T 7 ri . backyar q f Here are just two examples of d PUBLIc TRuST how SDIC catapulted stalled THE prOJecO fnt0 RC130f1: o / e The townhouse owners were so et's face it. Public trust in government agencies is at o - pro. opposed to the fire station they ~-an all time low. As a public official, you are faced with went to court to stop it. While the o / '1,~:;•; : ' this reatity every day and ou maY be shaking Your head Y court ruled that a fire station o i e io wondering why the public won't trust you. After all, you're could be built in their neighbor-, , , .`•''';~f,;,`~~~; y~=4;° ; just trying to do what's best for everyone. hood, it also ruled that the city . ~ bi iid But think about it. You're not just a public officia1, you are had to meet their needs in the - esign and operation of the Tfl' also a member of the public. Do you trust other governmental d s t a t i o . I f t e c i ty m e t t o s e n e e s ~ p p p~y tion spr e a d li ke wi l dfire: PI ~~Yi '4 I•rY {A 'rr ~.~t 1= agencies or public benefit corporations? Do you trust your to the satisfaction of the „Hands off our trees!„ local school board? How about your re$ion's utilitY comPanY? townhouse owners, the owners Wildfires in Alaska are common. K~'~'.~'~ We can take it a steP further. How would You feel about a would have to pay $50,000 in In one recent year alone, Alaskan V' ~ proposal to creaie a tQxic waste dump within a half-mile af attomey's fees. The city thaught foresis had 3,000 fires. Dangerously h. your home? the project was doomed. near the town of Cooper Landing sat Enter Ma ry Diener. New to the 4,000 a c r e s o f d e a d s p r u c e t r e e s. G i v e n t h e rig h t c i r c u m s t a n ces, any o n e o f u s c a n b e c o m e public sector, she worried about Althou g h the trees posed a fire the extremist op position that we, ourselves, com plain about. her chances for success, but she hazard, the townspeople adamantly tt doesn't have to be a project as controversial as a toxic had something other engineers did opposed the Forest Service's plan to waste dump, either. All we have to do is violate some basic not: SDIC training. After only 10 cut them down. For 6 years the battle principles about working with the public to create extxemists months oF working with the raged on-until 1989 when the who will stop at nothing to torpedo our projects, project's fiercest opponents, Diener Forest Service's personnel took SDIC sat at the Final city council training. ~ meeting and braced herself for an Just months later, the trees were atf ack. But here is what her cut down by the Forest Service "Me key to suecm opponents said: "If we could together with citizen-volunteers of change the site, we would; but we Cooper Landing. When the job was mplementing projects, even controversial ones, is a understand we can't. ..we heart- done, the Forest Service and locals lot more attainable than most administrators think. ily endo?se staff's recommenda- gathered for a celebration. Said one tions. We especially thank Mary citizen of the change in the Forest yhrough the Systematic Development of Informed Diener for meeting our needs." Service: "Before, it was bureaucratic, M Consent (SDIC), any worthy project can go from an The city council unanimously negative stuff. But as the program idea to reality without getting stalled or torpedoed. And you approved Diener's recommenda- started, I felt we had a real influence. don't need Machiavellian techniques of manipulation to do tions. The townhouse owners paid It boosted my self-esteem that people i~~ it. what ou do need are ood Consent-Buildin skills. ~ more than $7,100 each to cover wanted to hear what I had to say." { ~ Y g g , attomey's fees. Now that's goor~ Consent-Building! y~~ i i, y.~ . i..•..''3,,)^..~'~ _ rt;•`~v - INEEFIMILL Iff ~ccem cam I~~ ~~e M§e9 Y`:...,. : e I I ' , Th~ ~ ~~i~ ~"d0t ~`~e excePti~ g - po , o Mary Diener r.sn't an exception to the he bottom line society expect public agen- rrele. She is not rany different dhan you. ln o ifuli n being success- cies to care about the people fact, she had less oxperience than mast mission and 100'~ in the public whose lives they affect. We public-sectorprofe.Wonals. Whatshe did e i o-n- s-i -v- e ~ sector is to find the demand that our public hcave was a solyd strategy called SDIC, or ou don't have to ~ balance between being officials have compassion, the Systematic Development of Informed onipro , responsible and being no matter what their missions Consent. . On the one hand, may be. We define lnformed Consent as: "The responsive grudgzng willingness of opponents to go along with a public officials have the Most public officials have responsibility to accomplish traditionally believed that ~urse of action to whzch they actually are opposed. Remember Diener's opponent? `7f we could change the site their missions knowing full there are only three possible we would,• but. we heartily endorse staff's recommenda- well it will hurt some people. routes to take in dealing with tions. " That is Informed Consent. c- On the other hand, we as a this issue: ~~p by step . . 'C O~lt~~°O~tIiSe 0?L~° flliSSiOfI~~ 0?~t The only way to build Inform `°y ~ . . ed Consent is one .cOnljlll.~S~O'l;, f0~° y0U~°p~bj~C • step at a tzme. From the beginning of a decision- , _ . . _ .9:.,.._...:.:~,:,... making process (when you identify a public sector Forb'et bein con~p~sionate and., : ~ problem) to the end (when the solution has been imple- , . _•,_:juSt get,thejOb d0ftte9 Or : y .'mented), you need to busld consent urith yourpublic. , Through the Institute for Participatory Management and k C0mPromiSe 50% On t~e miSSiOn Planning, You can gain an understand .f ing o the man- ° . y. and 50% on cOmpaSSiOno agement and leadership methods whsch will help you to ' honestly build a re,spectful and trusting relalronship unth But none of these approaches lead to effective manage- your public. That kind of r. elationship rs the foundation to j ment. In fact, they all lead to public distrust of government successful implementation ofpublic-sectorprojects. and anyone associated with it-including you. So what are The Institute for Participatory Management and you to do? o- Planning provides a variety of courses, all based in the fundamental principles of the Systematic Deuelopmenl of Informed Consent, to give you a step-by-step method toward successful public-sector management. Ow ; fl~~ Ne Froiii ' / / professional etljics, , Institute It• ~uilding consent p ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - - , Yg i I I i I ~ e ( . ~~,~s~: ; , • / ciallyfor / ~ to buuld SuCCess epublic-seoge ` ; ~yri~~'•' t ~ j overnmental and public agencies are the most complex ~ K~~~,,a~f =a organizations in the United States. They are part of a l?.,;;Frofess{onal,ttbics,::,~.: ~10- Co»amission-to-Staff , unique environment consistin of s ecial interesc rou s Relatlons g P g P, eourse uiill belp remove some po li ticians, t he general public, individual crusaders, lobby- ~ilurrou' /n publrc organizations, a ists etc. Worwn effectivel within that com lex environment f~d'n8to~ard`a ' proje.~sYOnalsta,~typ~auyreportsto ~ g Y P ~;common sense practrce nf etblcs in an appointed Commrssioner or ~ t"` ean be difficult. thepiiblicseet~or: Board. 7brs course belpspublic ~ y~ These are the CpO: Cit~zen i? Issues of Leadersbiji ,~`~'P''~fe.~sronals dev elop ductive relationsb' with : courses we offer Partictpation by for public-Sector , commf,ssyoners/Commtcsimted Objectives ° Professionals Boards. I N . . to help public- sector man~CrS 75e natural erte~ulon of SDIC, 7br's course will help you deuelop ? personal Dectston- ~ CPD sbows you bow 6 bave mean-. the skr!!s to become a respected and j y.~ be successful in Making Tools tngful public involvement on • effective leader by managing i thC plIbfic areII3a. ~ Pro>ects. . : decisYOn-making througb the . . Too often, managers are stoPPed ( tecfmical analysl,s andpolitical not by some exte»wl force but by ? SDIC: Tbe Systematic CPO 2: : WOYking ,<<:'<~; ; debate processss. tbemselvss 7br's training will provule ~ Develoj~ment of ° tlrltb $xtt'em{sts a gurde to makingpersonal docuiorrs i Informed Consent Crdsis Management i in a way tba! contributes to your :,Part 2 of ~be CP+D cou?se ts a..' : persrnral and proje.ssYOrral suc~ss- . Providess the fundamental ` bands-on, problem,solving 7fifs, the newest of our seminars, ? and tbe success o ur ~ . I nc~les and methodsIar build- k works4 dea7m8 untb the mast` ~s in theP I rocess o beinB develoPed. ' y' ' f'~! ,organi,zalfon. . ~ ing Informed Corrsent among your dftult cetixen partuxpatio~t Even in the best circumstances crises . . ~ . . . publiG-especrally your fiercest problems you are fac»tg. can arise. ln today s highly volatile ~~~r n:ore injormution ubout ( _ . _ ~ . , _ . .:.i lbese courses write: opponents, public sector, every manuger needs a Institute for Participatory ~ practical grasp on how to effectively Management and Planning i manage the mast senous crises. P.O. eox 1937 , Monterey, CA 93942-1937 , Onstitute for participatory Bulk management and planning 1 1 POSTAGE e P.O. Bo.r 1937 CA- Monterey, Califor,tia93942-1937 ° - 93942-1 .37 , 4'•.` ~;'%`rt7 . S 3 f•.-v:. ,