HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-04-15 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session
vAoL TowN couNc¢L
Ei/ENIIVG IVIEETSIVG
TUESDAY, ApRIL 15, 1997
7:30 P.M. 9N TOV COII(VCVL CFIAiVIBERS
AGEfVDA
NOTE: Tames of utems are approxemage, subject to charage, and cannot be relied upora to
detereavune at vvhag tAme Coaancu6 wil6 consader an iterra.
1 • CITIZEN PARTICIPATIOIV. (5 mins.)
2• COfVSENT AGEIVDA:
A. Approve the Minutes from the meetin of March 4 and 25, 1997.
B. Ordinance fVo. 7, Series of 1997 reading, an ordinance
amending Section 15.02.020(C) of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail to Provide for the Adoption of an Annual Elevator
Inspection Fee. (5 mins.)
3• Ordinance iVo. 4, Series of 1997, second reading, an ordinance
George Ruther establishing Special Development District No. 35, Austria Haus, and
providing for a development plan and its contents; development
standards; and other provisions; and setting forth details in regard
thereto. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, lnc., represented by Gordon
Pierce. (1 hr.)
ACTIOiV REQUESTED OF COUNClL: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance
No.4, Series of 1997, on second reading.
BACKGROUiVD RATIONALE: Please see the memorandum prepared by
the Community Development Department staff dated April 15, 1997, to
the Vail Town Council and the memorandum dated April 14, 1997, to the
Planning and Environmental Commission. On April 14, 1997, the
Planning and Environmental Commission received the proposed changes
to the applicant's request for the establishment of Special Development
District No. 35, Austria Haus, located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part
of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
STAFF RECONiMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1997,
on second reading.
4• Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1997, second reading of an Ordinance
Tom Nioorhead Establishing a Traffic Offense for Failure to Provide a Complying Policy or
Certificate of Self-insurance. (15 mins.)
ACTIOiV REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/Deny/iVlodify Ordinance
8, Series of 1997, on second reading.
BACKGROUND RATIOIVALE: Council directed the Town Attorney to
prepare a proof of insurance ordinance consistent with that provided in
the State Nlodel Traffic Code. This will enable violations of this ordinance
to be prosecuted in the Town of Vail Municipal Court. STAFF RECOMMENDATIOtV: Approval of Ordinance No. 8, Series of
1997, on second reading.
5• Revievu of existing Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) policy and
Russell Forrest possible alternatives. (30 mins.)
Tom Braun
ACTIOiV REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Determine a preferred alternative.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Vail Town Council directed staff to
evaluate the existing GRFA system and determine whether. this. is an '
effective and appropriate tool for regulating mass and bulk when compared to other alternatives. The purpose of this work session is to
review the analysis for three alternatives to the existing GRFA policy for
single family, duplex, and primary/secondary type structures only. This
work session is intended to describe: how to implement each of these
alternatives; what homes might look like under each alternative; and to
identify considerations that would need to be evaluated for each
alternative. On March 10th, the PEC, in a 4-3 vote, recommended alternative 1 with several conditions. At the April 1 st work session, staff wifl review the afternatives with Council along with the recommendations
from the PEC and staff. At the evening meeting on April 15th, staff would
like to ask for Council's preferred alternative. Once Council decides on a
preferred alternative staff will begin the implementation process. This
could include additional research to answer questions relating to the
preferred action and would include developing proposed code revisions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has three recommendations: 1)
Implement new design guidelines regardless of the preferred alternative;
2) Out of the three alternatives, staff is recommending alternative 3
"eliminate GRFA" and modify site coverage to prevent homes from
becoming significantly larger; 3) If alternative 1 should be chosen, then
staff recommends that it apply only to existing homes buift before the
date this policy would go into effect.
6. Town Manager Report. (10 mins.)
7. Adjournment - 9:35 p.m.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4122/97, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IfV TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
7HE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON Tl9ESDAY, 5/6/97, BECINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWfV COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 516/97, BEGINBVING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIII111
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice
or 479-2356 TDD for information.
C:\AGENDA.TC
e
ORDINANCE NO. 4 DRAR
Series of 1997
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHNIENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 35, AUSTRIA HAUS; ADOPTING A DEVELOPNIENT
PLAN FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 35 lN ACCORDANCE WITH
CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE VAIL NIUNICIPAL CODE; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN
. REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land
in order to promote its most appropriate use and to improve the design character and quality of new
development within the Town of Vail and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in
the Vail Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council belicvcs that the establishment of Special Development
District No. 35 benefits the Town of Vail by enhancing and preserving the hotel bed base, increasing
retail shopping opportunities, generating sales tax revenue, implementing streetscape improvements
to East Meadow Drive and Slifer Square, and ensuring deed restricted employee housing for at least
12 employees; and
WHEREAS, the developer, Sonnenalp Properties, 1"nc., has submitted an application for the
establishment of Special Development District No. 35, for a certain parcel of property within the
Town, legally described as on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing and more
commonly referred to as the Austria Haus; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on February 24, 1997, and wflth the Des'sgn Revievv Board on Apral 14, 1997, held
a public hearings on the establishment of Special Development District No. 35, and has forwarded
its recommendation of approval to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080, have been sent to the appropriate
parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial to
the Town and its citizenry, inhabitants, and visitors to establish Special Development District No. 35;
and
Ordinance 4
j Series ot 1997
~
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the
Municipal Code of thc Town of Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
SECTION 2
Special Development District No. 35 is established to ensure comprehensive development and
use of an area in a manner that will be hannonious and compatible with the general character of the
Town, will provide adequate open space, deed restricted employee housing for e}ebtn-(H) twelve
(12) employees, streetscape improvements to East Mcadow Drive, public improvements to Slifer
Square and other amenities, and will promote the objectives of thc Town's Zoning Ordinance. The
development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and
Environmental Commission, and there are significant aspects of the special development district
which cannot be satisfied through the imposition of a standard zoning district on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No. 35 is established for the proposed development on a parcel
of land, tegally described as on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing, comprising
24,089 square feet/ 0.553 acres in the Vail Village arca of the Town. Said 24,089 square feet/ 0.553
acres may be referred to as "SDD No. 35."
SECTION 4
Thc Town Council finds that the Approvcd Development Plan for SDD No. 35 meets each
of the standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, ar
demonstrates that either one or more of thcm is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent
with the public interest has been achieved. Tn accordance with Section 18.40.040, the Approved
iaevelopment Plan for SDD No. 35 is approved. 7"he Approved Development Plan is comprised of
those pians submitted by Pierce, Segerberg and Associates Architects and Design Workshop, Inc.,
arid consists of the following documents:
I
Ordinance 4
2 Series of 1997
e
1. Existing Conditions, dated February~}9 April 14, 1997, revised per P-EC- Town Coaa¢nce?
(Design Workshop).
2. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Footprints, dated frbrnary-r9 April 14, 1997, revised
as per+E-E '?'own CoannceG (Design Workshop).
. • 3. Overall Site Plan, dated Ftbn=749 April 14, 1997, revised as per f~Ee Tovvn Councu? -
(Design Workshop).
4. Landscape Plan, dated FrbramT-+9 April 14, 1997, revised as per P£E Town cCoaanci?
(Design Workshop).
5. Grading Plan, dated Febi-aarq19 April 14, 1997, revised as per+£E Town Counci] (Design
Workshop).
6. Schematic Drainage and Utility Plan, dated ftbr=749 April gq, 1997, revised as per P£~E
Town Coannce? (Design Workshop).
7. Snowmeit Areas Plan, datedI'ebrum-y 19 April 14, 1997, revised as per P£~E Towse Couaaci?
(Design Workshop).
8. Sun/Shade Studies, dated-Femrary i 9 April 14, 1997, revised as per fiEE Town Coannce?
(Design Workshop). 9. Garage-Level Floor Plan, dated ~ebrany-9 Apai914, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg & Associates,
Architects).
10. First-Level Floor Plan, dated-rebrmtrp-28 April 14, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg & Associates,
Architects).
11. Second-Level Floor Plan, dated Febriraty 24 Apvil 14, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg & Associates,
Architects).
12. Third-Level Floor Plan, dated Frbrnary-20 April 14, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg & Associates,
Architects 13. Fourth-Level Floor Plan, dated febramq-29 April 14, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg & Associates,
Arcnirects). - -
i 4• Fifth Penthoasse-Levcl Floor Plan, dated FrbnraTy-M April 14, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg &
Associates, Architects).
15. Roof Plan, dated febrrnrq-29 A\praV 14, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg & Associates, Architects).
Ordinance 4
3 series of 1997
16. North/South Elevation Plan, dated Febmai-y 24 April 14, 1997 (Piercc Segerberg &
Associates, Architects).
17. East/West Elevation Plan, dated februm-pN Apri114, 1997 (Pierce Segerberg & Associates,
Architects).
' 18. Turning Radius Plan, dated April 14, 1997, (Design V6'orkshop). SECTION 5
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 4 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for its
consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council. These standards
are incorporated in thc Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of
Special Development District No. 35. The following are the development standards for Special
Development District No. 35:
A. Lot Area - The lot area consists of approximately 24,089 square feed 0.553 acres.
B. Density Control - The maximum GRFA for the Austria Haus shall not exceed 40,4-29
40,554 square feet. This figure includes -1$;16910,200 square feet of hotel accommodation units and
36,329 30,354 square feet of fractional fee-club units. The approved density for the Austria Haus
includes twenty-two (22) fractional fee club units, twenty-six twenty-eight (28) hotel rooms
(accommodation units) and one (1) on-site manager's residence (Type Ill Employee Housing Units),
for a total of 33-5 36.5 dwelling units.
C. Site Coverage - The maximum site coverage for Spccial Development District No. 35
shall not exceed 16;371 19,634 square feet, or 6$% 81% of the lot arca, and shall be as indicated on
the Approved Development Plans.
D. Setbacks - The setbacks of the Austria Haus building shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plans.
E. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved Development
Plans.
F. Height - The maximum height of the Austria Haus building shall be as indicated on
the Approved Development Plans.
G. Parking and Loading - Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code prescribes
the parking requirements for development. Foty-eight -
Ordinance 4
4 series or 1997
I~
, .
.A enenirnuan of sixty-six (66) annderground, OIE-SBte veh9CRe
p~arkisng spaces shaRR be proveded, in accordance wirth the Approved Deve6opmeaet P&arns. The
required number of loading and delivery berths shall be a total of 1 berth, in accordance with the
Approved Development Plans. H. Commercial Area - The maximum commercial area for Special Development District
No. 35 shall not exceed +446 41,649 square feet, or 11% of the allowable GRFA, and shall be as
indicated on thc Approved Development Plans.
1. Common Area - The maximum allowable common area for Special Development
District No. 35 shall not exceed +5;3ftS 14,004 square feet, or 3ft'a 35% of the allowable GRFA, and
shall bc as indicated on the Approved Developmcnt Plans.
J. Uses - The underlying zoning for Spccial Development District No. 35 shall be Public
Accommodation. The permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be those listed in Chapter 18.22
of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail with the exception of restaurants or similar food service
o erations which shall not be allowcd.
SECTION 6 - The developer, agrees with the following conditions, which are a part of the Town's approval
of the estabIishmcnt of Special Developmcnt District No. 35:
l.
. ,
. . . 35,
tile _
- , .
21. 7'hat the applicant prepare a deed restriction or covenant, subject to the Town
Attorney's review and approval, restricting the current and future owner's ability to
locate a restaurant or similar food service operation on the Austria Haus property.
Said deed restriction or covenant shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and
Recorder's Office prior to the applicant submitting for a building permit.
Ordinance 4
tj Series of 1997
\
32. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of Community
Development for review and approval as a part of the building permit application for
the Austria Haus:
a. Tree Preservation Plan;
b. Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan; . c. Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;
d. Stormwater Management Plan;
e. Site Dewatering Plan; and
f. Traffic Control Plan.
g. Roof Projection Plan (mechanical equipment)
43. That the applicant provide deed restricted employee housing which complies with
Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 18.57) for a minimum of
eleven " twelve (12) employecs, and that said deed restricted housing be made
available for occupancy and the dced restriction(s) recorded with thc Eagle County
Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
Austria Haus. .
. ,
. . . ,
.
,
Ordinance 4
• 6 series ot 1997
0
pioperty, adjace-it to Slifer Squate, .
,
e
e
u n .
, ~
101
,
$4. That the following design considerations be carefully reviewed by the Design Review
Board:
A) That thc mullions on the windows and doors, as dcpicted on the building
elevations, be a required element of the Ausfria Haus project.
B) That the applicant furthcr modify the south elevation of the structure, as
this elevation continues to be too architecturally repetitive.
C) That the applicant revisit the originally contemplated design which
incorporates the loading and delivery facility in the underground parking
structure. Staff believes that trying to accommodate loading and delivery in
the front entry drop-off area will result in conflicts between pedestrians,
vGhicles accessing the parking structure, and delivery trucks. Staff
understands the original design option may not be the desire of the owners of
the Village Center Condominiums, yet we believe the impact can be mitigated
with appropriate screening.
D) That the improvements recommended for East Meadow Drive, as depicted
in the approved Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, be implemented as a
part of the Austria Naus project. This includes a reduction in street width
from 30 feet to 26 fect (14 foot bus lane and 12 foot attached, paver
Ordinance 4
7 Series of 1997
.
pedestrian walk).
E) That the applicant increase the roof ovcrhangs on the building. Currently,
the overhangs vary from two feet to three feet. Staff would recommend that
all the roof overhangs be a minimum of three feet, with the exception of the
overhangs on the dormers. _
F) That a minimum of 251ineal feet of additional glass area (55%) be added
to the ground floor (north and east elevations) of the structure. This would
make the Austria Haus generally consistent with the transparency of other
buildings in the Village.
G) That the applicant review and modify the balcony configuration on the
building in order to eliminate the repetitive nature of the existing design,
particularly on the south elevation. The majority of the balconies on the
Austria Haus are locatcd on the south side of the building, although several
french balconies have been incotporated into the design of the north side of
the building on the upper floors.
H) That the applicant prepare a comprehensive sign progam for the Austria
Haus. The comprehensive sign program shall be reviewed and approved by
the DRB.
I) That thc Design Review Board carefully review the combination of the
proposed exterior building materials and how they are applied to ensure that
a high-level of architectural quality is maintained.
5. That an approval of the amended proposal to establish SDD #35 be conditioned
upon the approval of a minor subdivision by the PEC within ruinety (90) days
from rthe effective date of Ordinance #4, Series of 1997 and that all costs
incurred to subdivide the property be the responsibilflty of the Austria Haus and
not the 'I'own of Vail.
6. That the applicant review the north elevation plan for the Austria Haus and
provide additional acrhitectural relief to the building.
ScCiiON i
Amendments to the Approved Development Plan which do not change its substance may be
approveci by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing in
Ordinance 4
8 Series ot 1997
e
accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments which change
the substance of the Approved Development Plan shall be required to be approved by the Town
Council after the above-procedure has been followed. The Community Development Department
shall determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the Approved Development Plan, in
_ accordance with the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. , SECTION 8
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3)
years from the effective date of this ordinance, and continue diligcntly toward completion of the
project. If the developer does not begin and diligently work towards the completion of the Special
Development District, or at any stage of the Special Development District, the developer shall
recommend to the Town Council that either the approval of Special Dcvelopment District No. 35 be
extended, that the approval of Special Developmcnt District No. 35 be revoked or that Special
Development District No. 35 be amended.
SECTION 9
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be
invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of rhe remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases bc declared invalid.
SECTION 10
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and
proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
1NTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READiNG, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 25th day of 1Vlarch, 1997, and a public
hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 15th day of April, 1997, in the Council
Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Attcst:
Ordinance 4
9 sedes or 1997
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
' READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN
FULL this day of , 1997.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
Attest:
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clcrk
Ordinance 4
10 Series ef 1997
Ws'
Development Standard Underlying Zoning Existing development Proposed SDD'
of Public Accommodation on the property /
~
GRFA: 80% or 19,271 sq. ft. 49% or 11,800 sq. ft. 151% or 36,506 sq. ft.
Dwelling ~
units per acre: 13.8 DU's 18.5 DU's (37 AU's) 31.5 DU's (20 DU and
~ 23 AU's)
Site coverage: 55% or 13,249 sq. ft. 35% or 8,400 sq. ft. 66% 15,602 sq. ft.
i
Setbacks: ;
front: 20' 11' 0.5' 1
sides: 20' 9' / 10' 1' / 4' !
rear: 20' 13' 2' j
Height: , 48' sloping 36' sloping 46' flaE
45' flat i
~
Parking: per T.O.V. code Section 18.52 30 spaces" TBD*
Landscaping: 30% or 7,227 sq. ft. 31 % or 7,518 sq. ft. 7% dr 1,652 s. ft.
Loading: per T.O.V. code Section 18.52 1 berth 2 b~rths In fron
se~back
Commercial sq. footage: 10% or 1,927 sq. ft. N/A 211% or 10,346 sq. .
Common area: 35% of allowable GRFA N/A 26% or 10,483 sq. ft.
or 6,745 sq. ft.
' Numbers furnished by the applicant and not yet verified by staff
11 spaces are located off-site on T.O.V. ROW
To be determined
V. DISCUSSION 9SSl9ES
As this is a worksession to discuss the applicant's proposai to establish a Special Development
District, staff will not evaluate the proposal at this time. Staff has, however, identified numerous
issues which we would like to discuss with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the
applicant. Each of these issues is briefly described below:
1. The projects proposed departures from the Public Accommodation Zone District development standards.
- As illustrated in the zoning analysis in Section IV of this memorandum, the applicant is
proposing that the project depart from numerous development standards. The
departures from the development standards prescribed by the underlining zoning of
Public Accommodation range from a 151% increase of GRFA over the allowable, to
nineteen and one-half foot encroachments into the required 20-foot setback areas. Staff
would like the applicant to discuss with the PEC and staff the necessity for exceeding the
underlining zoning standards and the public benefit gained by said deviations.
2. The proposed front entry location and design.
The applicants have proposed a front entry drop-off area on the north side of the building
adjacent to East Meadow Drive. Due to the location of the front entry, the applicant
5
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: April 14, 1997
- SUBJECT: A request for a final review with the Design Review Board of the amended .
proposal for the establishment of Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, _
. located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village
First Filing.
Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce
Planner: George Ruther
0. B14CKCaRO@9ND
o On February 24, 1997, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing
to review a request for the establishment of Special Development District #35, Austria
Haus, located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First
Filing. Upon revievv of the applicanYs request, the Planning and Environmental
Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council (6-0-1).
The PEC's recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council included eight
conditions.
o On March 25, 1997, the Vail Town Council held a worksession and public hearing to
review the first reading of Ordinance #4, Series of 1997. Upon review of the proposed
ordinance, the Vail Town Council approved the ordinance on first reading (5-2) with seven
conditions. The conditions are as follows:
1. . That all the required parking spaces be constructed on-site rather than paying into
the Town Parking Fund. The Council will consider a land trade and/or a land
lease with the applicant to achieve the on-site parking requirement.
2. That two (2) creekside dwelling units (fractional fee club units) be converted to
accommodation units.
3. That the applicant install and operate the street heating system under East
Meadow Drive, adjacent to the Austria Haus.
4. That the applicant- agrees not to remonstrate against a streamwalk, in the T.O.V.
stream tract, adjacent to the Austria Haus should the Town choose to expand the
streamwalk.
5. That the applicant create 11 new, deed-restricted employee housing units rather
1
than deed-restricting 11 existing, dwelling units.
6. That the applicant return to the Pfanning & Environmental Commission prior °
to second reading of the ordinance for consideration of the new roof ridge
line design intended to reduce the height of the building and the newly
proposed building elevatoons.
7. That the applicant present an alternate loading/delivery/parking plan prior to
second reading of the ordinance.
In addition to ihe conditions, other issues raised by the various council members r,elating to the: _
establishment af Special Development District #35 included:
1. Reconsider the restriction on restaurant use in the building.
2. Increase the stream setback distance along the south side of the building to
provide further protection of Gore Creek.
3. Explore removing several lock-off units with the intent of reducing the overall
square footage of the building.
4. Remove the clock tower from the building. ` -
5. Increase the ratio of accommodation units to fractional fee units.
Second reading of Ordinance #4 is scheduled for review by the Council on Tuesday, April
15, 1997.
II. DESCRIPTIOPI OF THE FiEQUEST
The applicant is requesting a final review of an amended proposal for the establishment . , \
of Special Development District #35 as required by the Town Council.
The amended proposal includes the follawing changes:
1, The underground parking structure has been redesigned to accommodate
- all required vehicle parking on-site and to eliminate the need to pay-in-lieu
into the Town Parking Fund. The applicant has increased the on-site
parking spaces from 48 spaces to 66 spaces. This was accomplished by
extending the underground structure to the north underneath the ,
pedestrian walkway adjacent to the building and by adding one additional t..
valet parking space.
2. The applicant has reconfigured the interior layout of the Austria Haus. The
proposal now includes 22 fractional fee club units with 21 lock-off units, 28
accommodation units,'4,649 square feet of commercial area, and 14,004
square feet of common area. These changes include the conversion of ,
one fractional fee club unit on the creekside of the building to four
accommodation units.
3. The building footprint of the Austria Haus is proposed to be shifted seven
feet to the north as requested by Council. The shift in the buitding footprint
2
e
P
Total Building
Area: 72,667 sq. ft. 74,378 sq. ft. + 1,711 sq. ft.
Employee
Generation: 11 new employees 12 new employees + 1 new employee
[IV. ZONIFOG ANALYSIS
The Community Development Department staff has prepared a Zoning Analysis for the proposed Austria
Haus redevelopment. For comparative purposes only, the staff has included the development standards
outlined by the underlying zone district of Public Accommodation, the Development standards proposed
at first reading on March 25, 1997, and the amended development standards for Special Development .
District #35 as of April 14, 1997.
Wherever the proposed development standards deviate from the underlying zoning of Public
Accommodation, the standards are highlighted in bold type.
AUSTFdIA HAUS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPAFtISON
Lot size: 24,089 sq. ft. /0.553 acres
Buidable area: 24,089 sq. ft. /0.553 acres
Development Underlying Zoning FAarch 25, 1997 April 14,1997
Standard of Public ,4ccommodation SDD Proposal SDD Proposal
GRFA: 80% or 19,271 sq. ft. 168% or 40,429 sq. 4t. 168% or 40,554 sq. fit.
Dwelling
units per acre: 13.8 DU's or 25 units/acre 35_5 DU's (22 DU's, 36 DU's (22 DU's,
26 ,4U's, 1 7ype III EHU) 28 AU's, 1 Type III EHU)
Site coverage: 55% or 13,249 sq. ft. 68% or 16,371 sq. ft. 81 % or 19,634 sq. ft.
- Setbacks: •
front: 20' 0' 2"
sides: 20' S' / 20' 2720'
rear: 20' 7' 7"
Height: 48' sloping 56.5' 56'
45' flat 52' 52'
60' tower 68' N/A
Parking: per T.O.V. code 48 spaces on-site & 66 spaces on-site
Section 18.52 16.26 spaces
pay-in-lieu
Landscaping: 30% or 7,227 sq. ft. 19.8 % or 4,782.6 sq. ft. 18.2% or 4,542 sq. ft.'
Loading: per T.O.V. code 1 berth at drop-off area 1 berth at drop-off area
Section 18.52
4
• . .
has increased the distance of the building from the centerline of Gore
Creek and reduced the amount of impervious surface north of the building.
The additional seven feet is intended to provide more green space south
of the Austria Haus and provide greater protection of the Gore Creek
corridor.
4. The 68 foot-tall clock tower/front entrance has been removed. The
removal of the clock tower was in response to concerns expressed by
members of the Town Council and the community.
5. The architectural elevations have been changed significantly. To reduce
. the appearance of bulk and mass, the applicant has broken the building ,
mass into three building forms and redesigned the roof ridge line. The
redesign of the roof ridge line reduced the overall building height and
lessened the building's impact on views to the mountain. The new
building architecture and massing is intended to replicate the building
mass and architecture along Bridge Street and the Village Center
Buildings.
6. The ratio of fractional fee club units to accommodation units has been
reduced from 0.85 fractional fee club unit for every 1.0 accommodation .
unit (0.85:1) to 0.78 fractional fee club unit for every 1.0 accommodation
unit (0.78:1).
7. The proposed development standards for Special Development District
#35 were amended. The changes are indicated in the analysis below:
AUSTIRIA HAUS
Development February 24, 1997 April 14,1997
Standards Proposal Proposal
Dwelling Units: 35.5 D.U.'s (22 D.U./26 A.U. 36.5 D.U.'s (22 D.U./28 A.U. + 1 D.U.
1. EHU) 1 EHU) (2 A.U.)
GRFA: 40,449 sq. ft. "40,554 sq. ft. + 125 sq. ft.
- (D.U.) (30,329 sq. ft.) (30.354 sq. h.) 25 sq. h.)
(A.U.) (70,100 sq. hJ (10.200 sq. ft.) 700 sq. fl-)
Site Coverage: 16,371 sq. R. 19,634 sq. ft. + 3.263 sq. ft.
Parking: 64.26 spaces 66 spaces on-site + 1.74 spaces
(48 spaces on-site
16.26 spaces pay-
in-lieu) ,
Loading: 1 berth 1 berth N/C
Commercial
Area: 4,440 sq. ft. 4,649 sq. ft. + 209 sq. ft.
Common
Area: 15,308 sq. R. 14,004 sq. R. - 1,304 sq. ft.
3
b
Commercial •
sq. footage: 10% or 1,927 sq. ft. 11% or 4,440 sq. f4. 91% or 4,469 sq. f4.
Common area: 35% of allowable GRFA 38% or 15,308 sq. ft. 35% or 94,004 sq. ft.
or 6,745 sq. ft.
Totai Building Area: 72,667 sq. ft. 74,302 sq. ft.
` Assumes the approval of the amended lot area and lot configuration
V. T9iE SPEC9AL DEVELOPNAE6JT D9STRICT ESTABLBSHIIflENT PROCESS Chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code provides for the establishment of Special
Developrnent Districts in the Town of Vail. According to Section 18.40.010, the purpose of a
Special Development District is,
"To eracourage glexibiBity and crea4ivity in the cievelopment of land, in order to
prmmoqe its most appropriaYe use; to improve the design character and quality og
the new developmenY wBthin the Town; to facilitate the adequate anc6 economical
pPOdision of streefs and utilities; to preserve 4he natural and scenic features of open
space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as sYated in the Vail
Comprehensive Plan. An approved developrnen4 plan for a Special Development
DistricY, in conjuncQion duith the properties underlying zone dis4ricY, shall establish
the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the
Special DevelopmenY DistricY.,,
The Municipal Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in
evaluating the merits of the proposed Special Development District. The staff has addressed
each of the nine SDD design criteria in detail in the memorandum to the PEC dated February 24,.
1997(see attachment). Staff will not be addressing each of the design criteria in detail again.
Staff's review of the criteria is only of those issues which have changed as a result of the
amended proposal.
A. Design compaYibili4y and sensitivi4y to the immediate environment, neighborhood
and acijacen4 properYies relatide to_archi4ectural design, scale, bulk, building heigh4,
- buffer zones, iden4ity, character, visual integri4y and orientation.
The applicant has amended the architecture of the Austria Haus to reduce the
appearance of the bulk and mass. The Austria Haus has been broken down into three
separate "building" forms. Most notably, the height of the center and eastern portions of
the building have been reduced and the architectural style of the Austria Haus has been
changed to provide the appearance of three different "buildings". The architectural style
of the three "buildings" is intended to replicate that of the buildings in Vail Village.
As mentioned above, the building height of the-Austria Haus has been reduced. This has
been accomplished by separating the Austria Haus into three "building" forms (east, west
& center). The height of the "west building" form has remained unchanged with the
exception of the removal of the 68 foot-tall clock tower. The "west building" form has a
maximum building height of 56 feet. The height of the "center building" form has been
lowered from 56.5 feet to 48 feet. The height of the "east building" form has been
5-
.
lowered from 56.5 feet The 56-foot building height is based on existing (1997)
topography of the Austria Haus property, and not the original topography of the site (pre-
1963). Original topography of the site is not available., since the Austria Haus was
constructed in Vail prior to zoning (and prior to the requirement that a topographic survey
be submitted prior to development). Staff believes, based upon the location of the
existing retaining walls and the condition of the streambank, that the site was "cuY" when
the Austria Haus was built. While it is difficutt to know exactly how much of the site was
"cut", staff would conservatively estimate that approxirnately 2- 3 feet of soil was
removed. Given this conservative consideration, staff would estimate the actual building
height proposed for the Austria Haus would be 53 to 54 feet.
. According to the.Vail Village Master Plan Conceptual ~Building Height Plan; the Austria
Haus should be 3-4 stories in height, with a building story being approzimately nine feet, `
excluding the roof. The plan further indicates that one additional floor of
residential/lodging may also be accommodated on the Austria Haus site.
Although the proposed height of the building will diminish the amount of sun, and likewise
increase shading, along East Meadow Drive, the provision of heated public walkways
effectively mitigates this consideration, by providing ice-free and snow-free sidewalks.
Additionally, the "opening up" of Slifer Square will insure adequate light, air and open
_ space to a public gathering space. . _ •
. . . , Staff believes the applicant has redesigned a structure which continues to relate well to "
the site and the surrounding area. Staff further believes that the amended proposal is
appropriate for the site and takes into consideration the massing and scale of the
buildings in the vicinity. The new north elevation further enhances the pedestrian
experience and character of the Village. Staff would recommend that the Design Review
Board carefully review the proposed exterior building materials and how are applied to
ensure that a high-level of architectural quality is maintained.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable .
relationship with surrounding uses and activity. '
The uses and activities proposed within the Austria Haus have not changed from the
proposal of February 24,1997. The densiry and commercial square footage, however,
have changed as a result of the applicant adding accommodation units to the creekside
of the Austria Haus and the reconfiguration of the commercial area layout. The total
increase in density is one dwelling uniUacre and 125 square feet of GRFA with a 209
square foot increase in commercial area.
As a result of the increase in the number of accommodation°units and commercial area ' `~4
square footage, the employee needs of the Austria Haus have increased. A revised
summary of the Employee Housing Generation Analysis using staff's recommended
ranges is as follows:
EMPLOYEE HOl9SING GENERATION ANALYSIS
Staff Recommended Range Calculations:
The staff believes that the Austria Haus redevelopment will create a need for 39
additional employees. Of the 39 additional employees, at least 12 employees (30%) will
need to be provided deed-restricted housing by the developers of the Austria Haus. The
6
b
staff recommended ranges are based on:
1. the type of retail and office use proposed in the commercial space within
the Austria Haus;
2. the size of the Austria Haus lodging component; and
3. the high-level of services and amenities proposed by the developers for
the guests of the Austria Haus.
a) Retail/Service Commercial = 4,208 sq. ft. @(6.5/1000 sq. ft.)=27.4 employees .
- , (middle of range)
b) Office: real estate = 441 sq. ft. @(7.5/1000 sq. ft.) = 3.3 employees
(middle of range)
c) Lodging' = 28 units @(125/room) = 35 employees
(top of range)
d) Multi-Family (club units) = 22 units @(0.4/unit) = 8.8 employees
(range does not vary)
Tota! =74.5 employees
(-36 existing employees) =39 employees
(X 0.30 multiplier) =92 nevv empBoyees
'Lodging has a particularly large variation of employees per room, depending upon factors such as size of facility and level of
service/support services and amenities provided.
The staff continues to believe that the density and uses proposed by the applicant for the Austria
Haus do not conflict with the compatibility, efficiency or workability of the surrounding uses and/or
activities. In fact, staff feels that the proposed Austria Haus redevelopment will enhance the
existing uses and activities within the Village.
C, Compliance with parking and loading requiremenqs as outlined in Chapter 98.52. of
qhe Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Parking and loading requirements for development are established in Chapter 18.52 of
the Municipal Code. The parking and loading requirements are based on the square
footage of the uses proposed within a building. Based on the square footage of the uses
proposed by the applicant, 80.24 parking spaces and one load i ng/delivery berth are
required on-site. The Municipal Code allows "grandfathering" of the existing legal non-
conforming parking spaces. Currently, fifteen legal, non-conforming parking spaces exist
on the property. Therefore, the parking requirement for the proposed Austria Haus
redevelopment is 65.24 new parking spaces. In response to concerns expressed by-
various Council members, the applicant is proposing an underground parking structure
designed to accommodate 66 parking spaces and an enclosed trash fac+lity. The
applicant is no longer proposing to meet any of the parking requirement by paying into the
Town Parking Fund.
D. Conformity with 4he applicable elernents ofi the !/ail CoPnprehensive Plan, Tovun
policoes and Urban Design Plan.
7
The staff continues to believe that the proposed SDD conforms with the Vail Land Use
Plan as identified in the staff inemorandum to the PEC dated February 24, 1997.
E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the
property on which the special development district is proposed.
There are no natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the Austria Haus property.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. -
The applicant has revised the site plan in response to comments received from various Council members and the adjoining properry owners. The building footprint of the Austria
Haus has been shifted seven feet to the north to accommodate the increase in on-site
parking, to provide additional green space south of the Austria Haus and to increase the
width of the riparian corridor along Gore Creek. The shift in the building does not affect
the proposed east, west or north setbacks. The shift does increase the setback of the
building from Gore Creek. The building had previously been approximately 55 feet from
the centerline of Gore Creek, it is now approximately 62 feet from the creek centerline.
Staff believes the proposed site plan and building location is sensitive to the natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The shift in building
location will permit additional protection of the critical root zone of two large spruce trees
and allow additional regrading of the streambank to increase the success of the
revegetation.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and
ofif-site traffic circulation.
As required by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council, the
applicant has revisited the loading/delivery/parking plan. The pedestrian and vehicular
circulation system on and off the site has not changed. The applicant is continuing to
propose the loading and delivery in the front drop-off area and on the parking structure
access ramp. The applicant has prepared a Turning Radius Pian to illustrate how loading
and delivery is to be accomplished.
Through the course of the review of the Austria Haus redevelopment proposaV, staff has
reviewed several loading and delivery options were. The applicant had originally
proposed to provide one loading and delivery berth in the underground parking structure.
However, concerns were expressed by the Village Center Condominium owners that they would be negatively impacted by the noise generated from the delivery vehicles, since the
access to the underground location was immediately adjacent to their units.
The applicant had also explored the possibility of gaining underground access to their--_
structure through the Village Center garage. -It was determined that delivery vehicles
could not enter through Village Center due to height limitations in the garage.
As mentioned previously, the applicant is proposing to provide for loading/delivery in the
front entry drop-off area. The applicant anticipates that deliveries to the retail/commercial
shaps will arrive via UPS or similar types of courier. Staff continues to believe that this
location may negatively impact the pedestrian use of this area of East Meadow Drive and
suggests the applicant continue to explore placing the loading and delivery berth in the
underground structure, as originally contemplated.
8
a
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space an order to optimize and
preserve na4ura9 features, recreation, views and functions.
The landscape ptan has remained substantially unchanged. Minor modifications were
made to the regrading around the building to facilitate better surface drainage and to
increase views to the creek for the adjoining property owners. As stated previously, the
shift in the building footprint wilt help preserve two large spruce trees located at the top of
the streambank. The applicant is continuing to propose improvements to the Gore Creek
streambank adjacent to the Austria Haus. The improvements are intended to improve the
aesthetic quality of the streambank and stabilize the bare soils.
9. Phasing plaw or subdivision plan that will main4ain a workable, func4ional awd "
efficBen4 relationship qhroughou4 Yhe development of the special development
d'os4ricY.
The applicant is proposing a minor subdivision of the Austria Haus property. The minor
subdivision is intended to facilitate the relocation of the building and the expansion of the
underground parking structure. The proposed minor subdivision increases the total lot
area by approximately 930 square feet. The increase in lot area is a result of ensuring a
minimum of two-foot setbacks from the property line around the building, and that all
improvements are on the Austria Haus property. Staff would recommend that an
approval of the amended proposal to establish SDD #35 be conditioned upon the
approval of a minor subdivision request within sixty days of the effective date of
Ordinance #4, Series of 1997. Staff would further recommend that all costs incurred to
subdivide the property be the responsibility of the Austria Haus.
Va. STAFF REC061AMEP&DAT90N
The staff recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design
Review Board recommend approval of the request to amend the proposed establishment of
Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, located at 242 East Meadow Drive to the Vail
Town Council. The staff believes that each of the SDD design criteria continue to be met, as
identified in this memorandum and the staff inemorandum dated February 24, 1997. Staff would
recommend that the approval carry with the it the following conditions:
1. . Thai the Design Review Board carefully review the combination of the proposed exterior .
- building materials and how they are applied to ensure that a high-level of architectural
quality is maintained.
2. That an approval of the amended proposal to establish SDD #35 be conditioned upon the
approval of a minor subdivision request by the PEC within sixty days from the effective
date of Ordinance #4, Series of 1997 and ihat all costs incurred to subdivide the property
be the responsibility of the Austria Haus and not the Town of Vail.
3. That the applicant provide deed-restricted housing, which complies with the Town of Vail
Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 18.57), for a minimum of 12 employees, and
that said deed-restricted housing be made available for occupancy, and the deed
restrictions recorded with ihe Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Austria Haus.
f:\everyone\pec\memos\sonnensd.414 9
AUSTRIA HAUS SQUARE FOOTAGE ANALYSIS
Floor Common Area - Commercial Area - Accommodation Dwelling Units - Parking Area - Total - Square
Levels Square Footage Square Footage Units - Square Square Footage Square Footage Footage
Footage
Parking 3,019 sq. ft. 15,171 sq. ft. 18,190 sq. ft.
Level
1 st Floor 4,750 sq. ft. 4,649 sq. ft. 1,295 sq. ft. 3,024 sq. ft. 13,718 sq. ft.
2nd Floor 1,739 sq. ft. 4,925 sq. ft. 8,224 sq. ft. 14,888 sq. ft.
3rd Floor 1,849 sq. ft. 3,980 sq. ft. 9,246 sq. ft. 15,075 sq. ft.
4th Floor 2,260 sq. ft. 7,994 sq. ft. 10,254 sq. ft.
Loft Level 311 sq. ft. 1,866 sq. ft. 2,177 sq. ft.
TOTAL 13, 928 sq. ft. 4,649 sq. ft. 10,200 sq. ft. 30,354 sq. ft. 15,171, sq. ft. 4 02 s ft.
F:\E VERYONE\GEORGE W UST[ IAUS. SQF
~
1 , .
,
j ~ / .F~'"p~, ` ~ ~ - . , - "
I ' / ``'l I ' • ; i .T',: I _ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ .
.
.
. .
~ --.~._-_J ~.J '
. . .
.
_ ~ _ . ~
~
.
~
, . ,
. ~~;;~~°~~„F~1}.~~ J~'':° ; - • , v;~';_,~ -
i ;p ' r'r.,' : ' ~:~-.~y~,il ~•:~f,~
~..~.a.. w......o,..~. ~l( ~ i ~
..~.....~......r ._...o.,..~.....,~. JJ ''r• ,
. ~.....o....~..~ e,~.~.....~....... J
~
~ ~.A.e.
~
i AUSTRIA HAg1S vnti, cotoxano OVERAI.Y, SITE P:..1"d
~ SOIdAIEAIALP PROPERTIES, IPIC.
I LJ p
o~...~....p~.e R.w.eO PFm
~ - i
~
I.m o
/ ~ _
•
c ,E~:o
I E ~
• \ ~ _ - _
\ \
. . ~ . ~
,
,
.
_
. -
- _
G - .
ORf UNE ~
6,
60 ' - -CENTER
CREEK~--. _
1 twrrY
- ~ ~ _ -
. . . ? _ `
ro.
'
,
-
_ "
~
-
. . ~
. .
~ . . . j[~
~
. • - _
~ . , .y " • . ~'1 . .:I,~- " '_'__=_~r`',T'_""'_ ' _ BUILDING A .
-
,
:
~i NLL.oGE CENtER
;
-.,r--,,.r-;•--
' ~ rvn ~u...f---- - . ~ ~'wr^~ ` 'I ~ . M• ~j.._ ' ' .
UJ~ ~w . '1` •,I ..~..o~.:~...~.... ~
~~`..~1~Ell~(,-r•"1, , . , . . : ' Y_ ra.~.
. . . ~ . i , ~ _
»
; • . ,
. , ~
- . . :r . . - . ~ '
_ ~ . ~ . i . . .
. ~ I ..i ..i'r'~.: :it: ~:r'd"~! . , . . k _ ' .
. . -
I - . . ELIF£ PI.I A ..l .'!.I:: r' --:1. . . • _
~c
. . . .
;
~ ? r.
.
. . . . . . _ c '
/ . . _.-ii~._.'.
-
..o- - °
. . . _ _ - ' ' '
eLECE~ItER
~ , .
` . . _ . - - - - - -
- .
~ . ~ : -
. . . .."""'""'....i
. .
.
.
-
' ' ~ ~ . .
' - -
.e......
~'6,~~ . . ~ ~ . .
. . , . . . "
6F - . {t~' - a.....e.M . J .
b' BENCHES (17)
O BOLLARD9 (14) ~
O TRd9N RECEPiACLE (7) ~4p~ ~RIyE . '
0 LIGNT FIXTURE fI/
FLNli L19i
NOtE ~ Peviny, ~Ila Mn1~Mng • end IIgMi~g ~1+ell be ~
' confrnm lo lhe vell Bveetecppe hfe~lm Plen GCf'MoN NdnE 9~ZE OTY. rj ~
tJOTE ~ AddNOnel smell aees on ml e d bpen 3'• cel 30 0
PfOP `J ^J ^°O Colo.ado 9prvice ~ee Pien N ~
lo b-loceiaid ryenGall Ash 3 0 -4' cel 14
Roebel 9plrse 9 ge~lon ~ , . .
Goirmon.Anipm Dgelion •5 ~ . . , . . '
FA.ghe. .Mipe. ' S gallon 73 ~ .
AUSTRIA HAUS vuc, cor.oxwno LANDSCAPB PI.AI~
SONNENALP PROPERTIES, 1NC. °`~^ps•N;a.a~..~~°°°~^ ~ a.I 7
% ~ _ _ ~ - . •
. \ ~ . .
/ G vEhED - ` ~ / ' - •
Ri E ~ , . .
- . _ - -
CREEK~---~
.
: .
~ . ~
_
. ~
_ '
. . , -
`
. _ . - - - -
. . . '
~ .
1 . .
•
.
- - _ - - - - - - _ -
. . , ~ -
~
~ `
~ -
-
_
_
' ~ xe°'
_ • ' ~
-
~
\
- _
~ - - - -
.
• - -
- -
-
.
-
.
. . ,
~ - - - - - - -
.
, _
~
_ ,
.
/ , _ • _
,
~ - - - ~ - = - -
, . - _ - - - - - - - - - - - ~ -
/ - -
- ' - - - -
~d
.
, ,
° - - -
~ . ~.,e
' " ~.(w • / / ~ ~ _ " J"rtv r _'"r""_' ' "r' "_=r""_"
.
Y
~
. • ~ ' ' ~ ' • VILLK.E GENTER
~ . ~
BUILDMG'A'
\V:
'
'
'ELFERPLdZA
~
_
V,'
C]""'"
f"'
. ..._l~~ - - - '
-
. . ' - - - - . . .
~.!°-o. ? _ iT
. . . : ~ - ' - ~
_ . _ _ . . . . S ' ~ NLLdGE CV11ER
~ . ~ . . . _~Q_'tS.i»c'_:=a~ b ' _ p ~ " ' " • BNOP!
. . . . .
'
_ . . ....,i: _ ..~.I~ :'i~s',_'_'-ii:=1_--~ ' , ' -
. . .
Y, _
1 1'
~j -r_- : . . . . . : . :
~ , .
P,.
. . . . ~ . ~ . . ;
. . .
~
: ~ :
O'. .
E
. ' ' ~ ~ - :
. ;t . . . ~
AY1S'T$ZgA HAU3 vuL, coc.oxnno ~ G3RADIIVG PL.AN
~-7
SONAIEIVALP PROPERTIES, IPIG o a o po.a wo aM1a a~ iiop
~ ' ' ~ .
~~c
i E ~ ~ ~ \ • ~ ~ _ , -
/ \ _ ' ` \ / , _ . . ; _
. , , . . _ ~ '
l
. •
_ - CEN
.
CREEK "
~ ` ~ - ~ ` - _
.
~ \
VILLdGE CENTER
~ - ' ~ - ' _ o BUILDMG 'd'
Iz /i , s
ENOU!-t6PJCNdLP
ELi AREA.
T~P.
- TQIN pF V41L
I MI0V1"ELT A/iE4- TYP. .
' 00WENALPENOUHELTAREA-TYP. / ' / ' _ •'I
6L IFER PL dZA ~ - - _ ,
w-
NLLAGE CENtER
~n ` 6HOFS \
iCUN Gf VdIL
ENOU11ELT AREA• \
TYP.
\
AUSTRIA HAUS v,Ul, coi.oxwno SNOW MELT ART3AS
I SONNENALP PROPERTIES, INC. M~w oR c e x:o v~ n ~
, I LJ I
~ M a,.~., .a.. . , „ „
cOR f
• ~ ~ ~ , E~ , ~ - CREEK - - - - - - - CENTER .L ..E . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ _ _
\
aV _ `
8160 /
SLIFER 99~ - ------L----=-- , , - ~
PLAZA ~ -i---- .
~ ,
- -
i
d~) ~---1 ,
.
'oQ~t- F
~
NLLdGE
CENTER
CCNDO'S
DLOG.4
1 'a.{'
/.1 ~ j ~ ' ' ~
fd -.r.~ ,~._.P._......_....
, ~ :
i ~ i ~ ~ =r_ - -
~ -
, s. ~
{
~w~r~u
_ +P.~..r+~s~ r ~
,
r
; - - - ~ s_
r -
~.~....,n
Fi d
---°---D---- --O--a-z=_s -
VILL 9ECENtER
~
T ,erxc
U , : • GCY1- ~a1
~
, • _ r
_ _ ~ _ , _ _
C
~ ~
nyi ' ' .
~ .
...o.,.e..s....... . _ _
. :
~ . ~
- .
_ . , .
~
ORGHti MOOffAtt /~R!• ]~O]I ~I
PNOAOlED 1`~PCIRT AnEA )f-I
AUSTRIA lE$AUS v.U c, coLOxnno COMPARYSOIV OF E3CISTIIdC3 AAID PROPOSED FOOTPRINTS
SOAIMEAIALP PROPERTIES, HNC.
.,..~.a,.....m...~~.~. .o.~. . , ~
_ 'i ~ • ' ~ ' - • _ ~ ' 1 J
n• L-1 ew-m,k r:.1-6.1 SvW.
TurN~~0.Wlu~ 7 ~ ~ I t µ
w\? . ' I/'lae~A~iomrLlkF~ltiy~
I I . Tu~NntP~A ~ i\\ ~ ~ I
~ , ~ ~ ~
I I i , I
, . ,
;
~
, f ,y.~ ~ _ .
„ ` - -
_ . .
~
/
~ - o
. D . . ~ . . _ .
• 35'-0" Svaight f3ody Truck 55'-0" Semitrailer & Tractor
Turning Radius Combination
~
Turning Itadius
~ . , _ ~
\ U. P Mrr4r. IM~ F. Amarb A Prk.4
~ / ~
e a n..
U. e M..a.. n.n. ro. nrn-
/t_A~
~
. ~
.
M
AUSTRIA HAUS v,uL, coLOx,+no T RU NING RADIUS PLAN
n -
"H
SONNENALP PROPBRTIES, INC.
i - - - . ~ I.
~ .
I
- - . I
~ (°1 ' ~ . ~iJ ~u) • i; T i~i) ~ i
~ ' I n ~ Y - .
~ ~ ' . • . ~ ~ . NI I
- ~ ~ ~ - Q o ~
TI-
- ' . ~ . ~ . ~ ~
r
~ I ~ , , . • ~ ~ ~ . . , ; ` 9 ;r, • ~ Q
;
,
, . I
'
i I ' i l ' i I ' I I `
I I ~ g , ~a i
~ , .
;
iL{ I _ - - . = r--; ~
' ~ •
~ ' I i
- - - - ~ ` ' ~ -
. -rt_ " _ _ "h"'~ ~ • ' ~ _'97'~ nROr~~ ~I , p _J r..~..-.._'_'_ IIl""~ ,
I
I
• ~ I' I.
;
GARAGE LEvEL PLOOR?LAN I-I A 2.0
OS~""o^ l. .
~ - - - - - -
. . . - . . _ , ~ . _ .._t._. . _ . _z
i
. I ~ LRe.1.e.x A
n., n~...n
. ~ I....... I
,
i I I ! I I~
. ~
~ + e
' i
, . ~
, .
, . _
. .
~ ~ - _.°_~r-iti"~k-"i. ~ -
- _ - - I - - - - - - - -
'4 • I T-II~ I
Q'0
eDwai rv. Loc~.-a. ~ ` a «ora m~ ~w.a LY~YS
, 1 I r
1- - , > i
~ I
~ i
i
, 41.
. ~
~ l
Em
- - - - - ~ - - - - -
_ ,l - + - _ = - . .L ~
d~.•,' i i ~ i ~ , i I;
.
- - - - -
- I I ~ ~ ~
• I I ~ I I ~ I ~ I I:• ~
.
.
, • - I
, ; -~--I--. ¦-----~---a__.:_.__~- 4- j.._.-.. I- . . ~ I -
+ . . . ,
• I I I I I 1. „ ~ ~ I
' " i
. - ,
a ,
a
~ i FIRST LEvEL FLOOR PLAN I ~
a I. I
)
' SA~ivv'I-b
.~h.e.n
!r) _ • ~
, ; ; -
. .
.
. .
- - , .
~ - - - ~
~ ; - _ _
i
i , ~ ~ ; ~ Q!lo I
V
,
,
,
.
;r.. I- - - -.:~~r . - - - - - ~ QI
! . L I _ _.-4..
' ~ , i i._., ..,.j.. a... I .._...j - - - - l
~'~t:_~•:~' I^ i ~ I ~ I I I ' I I
~ ~ ' ~ I ~
I i I I~ ~
- - -
~ ~ I I ~ - . - . I
. I ; ' ,o...
` ! I i ' i ~
I i I i I i I I I , I
I I I I I I I I I I
~ I I I • I , ~ ~ I~~~ I
~ ~ 1 I i ; i I I I ~ I
~ . . .
I.~
~
t ~
•
I ~hr-~'•~` m~
j -n 1
~ _~15ECOND LEVEL FOOQ PLAN
.n~.•.
. ? .r. ~ ^ 2.2
~ -
~ . . . .
. .
. , . _t.... _ ~o.,,,oa, I.
i
- I
~
. ._x~.,
! ~ Inh~uH
AiA
~S
~ O
{•1 1 ` . ~_~~l l,l
~ ' ~ . , •
i ~
' ~
-
~
't
i
.N"d.
i ,
i i
; ~ -
. •p~ ~ _ _ _ ~.1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - I. ~rk043e. t ~:j
~i..~
i i QI
I
--'---~---t; i---- .
I ; ~ = I~_ - -'..-.~.i~. - i. ~...I - - I " _
_ ' - _
_ " _ _ -
I : 1 -
~
- ~ - `
~
i ~
i i TNIRD FLOOR PLAN
~
3
i I
e , .
i % 2..3 I
~ - - ~ ~
i, ~
' /~I.oclms
Mhbrn
I I i.A~A
~ 1• ll
- - ~
i d,
- . _ - - -
- - ~
, ~
' ' a Q
- - - -i - - - --I - - - - Y--_..~ - - - - - - - - - - - - H a
oo,
...i.----
I I _ ~ I ~ i'--'- ~ . . -
' ~ - I I
I ' , ~ ,rc.ar i
~
.
~
I j , i •
i ;
, •
~ • , , ~
~ .
M ~
i i FOURTH LEvEL FLOOR PLAN
i
? I n Z.a
-
, .
. ~ ~....,~.~c,
/v~ hnti H
C ~ I
li I>1 ~i ',~l y i I
,
, - - _ - -
, ~
Q ~
• - - -
,
o '
_ - ---------T- -
I F-I; ,
i
i I ; ~ ~e.........~...K..~._. • • ~ ! ~
~ .
-i - -;1 - - - -i.. _ I
- - -
I ! I I I i
I i I i I I I i ~ f !
I ! I I I I I ! i I I
i I I I I ! I I I I ' I
- - -•-•--.-.-.~.-.-._j
~ , I I i I I I I I I I I ~
~
i II
, ~ '
~ i
NTHOUSE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN r
s .
.
!n AYr1
r~ i ~ i i I
~ . . - - - ~ ~ ` :
~ - ~ - !
- - - -
, . -----i , ~ r-- - --r -
r- .
I
~ - -
: i
~ : r- ~ ~ - ~ •i- - , ~ - -
. ~ :
i
. . ~ y,.~ ~ 1' ~ ~ I ~ ~
~
i~
~ i. _ _ . ~ , i
~
.L 1 J
~ I
i
~T
i i
, .
~
r
.
~ ~ 1 1
~
i .
~ ~ ~ - -
1__'_____
1 r 1 '
F------
-
1
. ,
~
- - - -
~
i
i r
r'4
,
~
. . . ~
. ~ ~
,
;
i _
' . i . ~ i ' . .
~
~
i .
. . " • ' ~ i.
. '
~ ' ~C_'-. __~_~'._._.~Y.-~- 'i " 1-~-'_ _ " ' I
i
~
~
. . . . ~
~ . ~ i
• ~
I I _
~ ~
~ i ROOF pLAN
€ I A 2.G ~
. . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ .
i ~
_ _ _ _ . . . t...
, . .
-
- - - - , ~
- - -
i RF~an
Gf'I~:Y
~ A.:.71i IAti:I
1 ~
^ I
J.
, r - -
,
, _1 r"-~~ ~ I
1~ 12-11
~ ~ , _ _ _ . . ~ "`°_4-- ,
~r
- m ID' ,
---1--f~ .~--1 _ - i
I _ s
- - i =o i
. --NORTH FlEVAT10N Q O I
v VFI'i' i
~
~
~
- --q'~-- ~ - '
Tr
; -I
~ ~ I I T ~ ' -~n,~~ i
..I
/
_ , • _ _r_ . ~ ~ . ~
. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - .
i • L' --F-
~ I T I . I • ~ ~ I I"I . ~L~.ILI~ J~. i
~ ~ ~ _ <<l~~ ? T i ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~~i~:.~,~ ~ ~ w ; i ~
~
: : - -
_
, I' . II l rIfII'
,
I~~"-r"-Iffl{ ~I~I~_~~.~'~~I'~LI I m ~T,I
~r'
.
- - - - - - .--e
_ - - - -~--rc _ _ _
--FT,
~ i • I _ I
l~~
!,'-l
- - SOUTH EIEVATION
A 3.0 ~
~.~.,n.,~ a
sy ,e
ArrA~ir
~ t
1 ~I
J~I
Q ,R
. =a
Q ~
f ~ • - - fi ~I
ME
^,r . 1
.~'1 m p~o
1 1
IMP
~ - -
-I
4t~y,._
-y-
CAST ELEVATION WFST ELEVATION
. .
f['w11:1/P-1'V . ~C.LLl~ V~l'-O' I
/
I i
. ~ II
J
Ry ~
I~ a
A31
i
i
, . ORIGINAL
AUSTIAHAUS DEVELOPMENT
STAFF MEMoRANDtM
AUSTRIA HAUS REDEVELOPMEPIT
Staff Memorandum
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REGIUESTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A. Establishment of a Special Development District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
B. ConditionalUse Permit 2
~ il. BACKGROUND 2 ~
. Iil. ZONING ANALYSIS 3.
IV. THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
(nine SDD Criteria)
A. Design compatibllity and sensitivity to the Immediate environment, nelghborhood end adjacent
properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building helght, buffer zones, Identity,
character, visual integrlty and orientatlon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
B. Uses, activlty and density which provide a compatible, efficlent and workable relatlonship wlth
surrounding uses and activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Employee Housing Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Emplokee Housing Generation Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
C. CompIlance with parking and loading requirements as outllned In Chapter 18.52. of the Town of Vail
MunlclpalCode .........................................................................13
D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehenslve Plan, Town pollcies and Urban
Design Plan .............................................•-•-•..........................14
VallLand Use Plan 14
VailVillage MasterPlan ...........................................................15
Vail Villaqe Deslan Consideratlons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Urban Deslgn Consideratlons .....................................................18
Architect Landscape Consideratlons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
E. Identificatlon and mltlgatlon of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on whlch the
specfal development district Is proposed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional
development responsive and sensitive to naturai features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quaUty of
the community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
G. A circulatlon system designed for both vehicles and pedestrlans addressing on and off-site traffic
circulation ..............................................................................35
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural
features, recreatlon, views and functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
i. Phasing pian or subdivislon plan 4hat will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship
throughout the development of the speclal development distrlct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
V. CRITERIA AND FlNDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
AITACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 4
Q
According to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail, the applicanYs property is zoned Public
Accommodation. The Public Accommodation Zone District is intended to provide sites for lodges
and residential accommodations for visitors, together with such public and semi-public facilities
and limited professional offices, medical facilities, private recreation, and related visitor-oriented
uses as may be located in the same district. The Public Accommodation District is intended to
provide sites for lodging units with densities not to exceed 25 dwelling units per acre. The Public
Accommodation Zone District, prior to January 21, 1997, did not permit interval ownership.
Interval ownership was only allowed as a conditional use in the High Density Multi-Family Zone
District pursuant to Ordinance #8, Series of 1981.
III. ZOPIING ANALVSIS
The development standards for a Special Development District shall be proposed by the
applicant. Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density
control, site coverage, landscaping and parking and loading shall be determined by the Town
Council as part of the approved development plan, with consideration of the recommendations of
the Planning and Environmental Commission and staff. Before the Town Council approves
development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it shall be determined that
such deviations provide benefits to the Town that outweigh the adverse effects of such
deviations. This determination is to be made based upon the evaluation of the proposed Special
Development District's compliance with the Review Criteria outlined in the following section.
The Community Development Department staff has prepared a Zoning Analysis for the proposed
Austria Haus redevelopment based on the revised plans submitted by the applicant on February
12, 1997. The Zoning Analysis compares the development standards outlined by ihe underlying
zone district of Public Accommodation and Ordinance #8 (SDD #12/1984) to the proposed
Special Development District #35. For comparative purposes only, and at the request of the
Planning and Environmental Commission, staff has included the approved development
standards of Special Development District # 30, (the Vail Athletic Club).
Wherever the proposed development standards deviate from the underlying zoning of Public
Accommodation, the standards are highlighted in bold 4ype.
3
. 10
AUSTRtA HAUS
Lot size: 24,089 sq. ft. /0.553 acres
Buidable area: 24,089 sq. ft. /0.553 acres
Development Underlying Zoning Ordinance #S Proposed SDD
Standard of Publlc Accommodatlon (SDD #12/1964)
GRFA: 80% or 19,271 sq. ft. 118% or 28,591 sq. ft. 168% or 40,429 sq. ft.
Dwelling
units per acre: ~ 13.8 DU's 34.5 DU's 35 DU's (22 DU's,
(2 DU's & 65 AU's) 25 AU's, 1 Type 111 EHU)
Site coverage: 55% or 13,249 sq. ft. 71 % or 68% or 16,371 sq. ft.
17,103 sq.ft.
Setbacks:
front: 20' N/A
sides: 20' N/A 5' / 20'
rear: 20' N/A 7'
Height: 48' sloping N/A 56.5'
- 45' flat 52'
60' tower 68
Parking: per T.O.V. code Section 18.52 5 short-term 48 spaces In garage and
spaces on-site 16.26 spaces
71 parking spaces pay-in-lieu
pay-in-lieu
Landscaping: 30% or 7,227 sq. ft. A detailed plan 19.8 % or 4,782.6 sq. ft.
was to be submitted
for DRB approval
Loading; per T.O.V. code Section 18.52 1 berth 1 berth at drop-off area
Commercial
sq. footage: 10% or 1,927 sq. ft. 36% or 11% or 4,440 sq. ft.
11,555 sq.ft.
Common area: 35% of allowable GRFA N/A 38% or 15,308 sq. ft.
or 6,745 sq. ft.
4
Vail A4hle4ic Glub
Lot Size: 30,486 square feet/0.699 acre
Buildable: 30,486 square feeU0.699 acre
Development Underlying Zoning Special Development
Standard of Public Accommodation District #30 Approval
GRFA: 80% or 24,388 sq. ft. 113% or 34,505 sq. ft.
Dweliing
units per acre: 17.5 DU's 33 DU's (4 DU's,
55AU's, 4 Type IV EHU's)
Site coverage: 55% or 16,767 sq. ft. 70% or
21,350 sq. ft.
Setbacks:
front: 20' 0'
sides: 20' 12'/12'
rear: 20' 2'
Height: 48' sloping 67'
Parking: per T.O.V. code section 18.52 29 valet spaces
(87 spaces)
Landscaping: 30% or 9,145 sq. ft. 32% or 9,730 sq. ft.
Loading: per T.O.V. code section 18.52 N/A .
Commercial
sq. footage: 10% or 3,049 sq. ft. 13% or 4,066 sq_ ft.
Common area: 35% of allowable GRFA
- or 8,536 sq. ft. 44% or 15,054 sq. ft.
9V. THE SPECIAL DEVELOPflflEiVT DISTRICI' ESTABLISHDAEIVT PROCESS
Chapter 18.40 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code provides for the establishment of Special
Development Districts in the Town of Vail. According to Section 18.40.010, the purpose of a
Special Development District is,
"To encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land, in order to
promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of
4he new development within the Town; to facilitate the adequate and economical
provision of s4reets and utilifies; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open
space areas; and to further the overall goals of the cornmunity as stated in the Vail
Cornprehensive Plan. An approved developmen4 plan for a Special Development
District, in conjunction with the properties underlying zone district, shalt establish
5
the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the
Special Development District."
The Municipal Code provides a framework for the establishment of a Special Development
District. According to the Municipal Code, prior to site preparation, building construction, or other
improvements to land within a Special Development District, there shall be an approved
development plan for the Special Development District. The approved development plan
establishes requirements regulating development, uses and activity within the Special
, Development District. .
. Upon final review of the proposed establishment of a Special Development District, a report from , -
the Planning and Environmental Commission stating its findings and recommendations and a
staff report shall be forwarded to the Town Council, in accordance with the provisions listed in
Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code. The Town Council's consideration of the Special
Development District shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.130 - 18.66.160
and approved by two readings of an ordinance.
An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and
activities of the Special Development District. The development plan shall contain all relevant
material and information necessary to establish the parameters with which the Special
Development District shall adhere. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to,
the approved site plan, floor plans, building sections and elevations, vicinity plan, parking plan,
preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted, conditional and accessory uses.
~ The determination of permitted, conditional a.nd accessory uses shall be made by the Planning
and Environmental Commission and Town Council as part of the formal review of the proposed
development plan. Unless further restricted through the review of the proposed Special
Development District, permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be limited to those
permitted, conditional and accessory uses in the properties underlying zone district.
The Municipal Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in
evaluating the merits of the proposed Special Development District. It shall be the burden of the
applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with
each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or
that a practical salution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. The staff has
addressed each of the nine SDD review criteria below:
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood
and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height,
buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.
The staff believes it is helpful to summarize the architectural design issues that have
been previously identified by the staff and the PEC, and have been addressed by the
applicant over the course of the five preceding worksession meetings.
Jeff Winston of Winston & Associates, Inc., has provided consultation on the proposed
urban design elements, architecture and site planning proposed by the applicant. Jeff's
comments are in response to the revisions made by the applicants after the worksession
meeting held on January 13, 1997. Jeff was at the February 10th PEC worksession and
discussed his comments.
6
North Elevation
1. The front entry to the Austria Haus was relocated to the west of the building to
accommodate guest drop-off and reduce vehicular traffic on East Meadow Drive,
east of the existing traffic control gate location. The front drop-off area was also
reconfigured to provide better traffic circulation and reduce confticts between
pedestrians and vehicles.
2. The.northeast corner of the building was reduced in size to open this portion of
the site to Slifer Square, and to provide additional articulation and visual interest to the north elevation. These changes were made in response to concerns -
expressed by Jeff Winston and the staff.
3. The northeast corner of the building will no longer be used for a bus shelter. The
~ proposed bus shelter was determined to be too far removed from the actual
location where a bus will stop. The applicant has proposed a new location for a
bus shelter east of the Austria Haus in Slifer Square. The bus shelter has been
designed in cooperation with the Town of Vail Public Works Department.
4. The balconies on the north side of the Austria Haus have been eliminated. The
elimination is a result of the applicanYs desire to increase the square footage of
the accommodation units located on the second and third levels of the building.
The loss of the balconies has created more building mass along East Meadow
Drive, however, staff believes this change has been successfully mitigated by the
~ applicant.
South Elevation
1. Staff was concerned that the south elevation was too repetitive, too linear and
lacked the architectural interest of the north elevation. The applicant has
removed two of the chimney chases from the south elevation in an attempt to
eliminate the repetitive nature of the design. Staff would recommend that the
applicant further modify the south elevation as the elevation still appears too
repetitive. Staff would again recommend that the applicant explore ways of
reducing the repetitive nature of the south elevation. Staff believes these
changes are aesthetic in nature and can be addressed at the time of Design
Review.
2. The original design proposed commercial retail space on the first level, on the
south side of the building. After discussions with the PEC, this space was
removed because there was a concern about pedestrian circulation, the need for
off-site improvements and potential impacts on adjacent property owners. The
commercial retail space was replaced with three, fractional fee club units.
East Elevation
1. The eastern end of the building has been reduced in width and the corner "cut
back," as recommended, to open up the Austria Haus to Slifer Square. This
change also provides a horizontal step in the alignment of the building, along East
Meadow Drive.
7
2. Concerns were expressed over the use of a flat roof on a portion of the east end
of the building. The flat roof portion has been eliminated and a dormer and ,
exterior deck have been introduced. Staff believes this change results in a much
improved east elevation by providing an increase in architectural interest and
detail.
West Elevation
1. The west end on the Austria Haus has been changed substantially in response to
concerns raised by the staff, Jeff Winston, Village Center merchants and the
adjoining property owners. The applicant originally proposed a much taller west .
" elevation and a covered garage entry. The covered entry has been removed to
reduce building mass and eliminate building encroachments into the 20-foot side •
setback. The height of the west elevation has been reduced by further clipping
R. the hip back, lowering the eaveline and dropping ihe ridge elevation.
2. The west end of the building was increased slightly in width. The increased width
allows the northwest corner of the building to move closer to East Meadow Drive,
improving the streetscape.
3. Additional landscaping plantings are proposed along the western end of the
building. The additional landscaping is intended to screen the garage entrance
from the Village Center residential units and buffer the vehicle activity in this area.
The landscaping extends onto Village Center property. A copy of an approval
from Village Center has been attached for reference.
Staff believes the applicant has designed a structure which relates well to the site and the
surrounding neighborhood. The mass of the Austria Haus is appropriate for the site and
takes into consideration the massing of the buildings on the adjoining properties. The
building steps down on the east and west ends to insure a smooth transition between
properties and does not create an imposing "canyon" along property lines. The north side
of the Austria Haus was designed with a pedestrian scale in mind. The retail shops on
the north side of the Austria Haiis create a commercial connection along East Meadow
Drive, between Slifer Square and the Village Center retail shops. The commercial
connection has been missing along this portion of East Meadow Drive and staff believes
that the Austria Haus will enhance the character of the Village.
The exterior building materials of the Austria Haus are a mixture of stone, stucco and
wood. The roof material is proposed to be a reddish, tile-type roof similar to the material _
used on the Sonnenalp Bavaria Haus. The applicant has proposed to incorporate
irrigated flower boxes into the design of the structure. The use of divided light windows
all around the building creates a European-feel and reduces the appearance of too much
glass. Staff believes that the combination of building materials has been well
incorporated into the design of the Austria Haus. The applicant has proposed that the
exterior stucco color be an off-white to yellowish/cream color to blend in with the exteriors
of the Mountain Haus and the Village Center buildings.
The height of the Austria Haus exceeds the allowable building height of the Public
Accommodation Zone District by approximately nine feet. The development standards for
the underlying zone district indicate that the maximum height for buildings with sloping
roofs shall be 48 feet. The applicant is requesting that the maximum building height for
the Austria Haus be approximately 57 feet. The 57-foot building height is based on
existing (1997) topography of the Austria Haus property, and not the original topography
of the site (pre-1963). Original topography of the site is not available, since the Austria
Haus was constructed in Vail prior to zoning (and prior to the requirement that a
8
topographic survey be submitted prior to development). Staff believes, based upon the
location of the existing retaining walls and the condition of the streambank, that the site
was "cuY" when the Austria Haus was built. While it is difficult to know exactly how much
of the site was "cuY", staff would conservatively estimate that approximately 2- 3 feet of
soil was removed. Given this conservative consideration, staff would estimate the actual
building height proposed for the Austria Haus would be 54 - 55 feet. According to the
Vail Village Master Plan Conceptual Building Height Plan, the Austria Haus should be 3-4
stories in height, with a building story being approximately nine feet, excluding the roof.
The plan further indicates that one additional floor of residential/lodging may also be
accommodated on the Austria Haus site.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable
relationship with surrounding uses and acYivity.
The Austria Haus is located immediately adjacent to the Vail Village Commercial Core.
The Austria Haus is bound on the east by Slifer Square and the Mountain Haus, on the
west by the Village Center residential/commercial buildings and on the south by Gore
Creek, the Covered Bridge Building, Gasthof Gramshammer and the Creekside Building.
Each of these buildings are a mixed-use development incorporating commercial/retail
space with residential and/or accommodation units.
. The applicant is proposing a mixed-use development that is in compliance with the uses
allowed in the underlying zone district. The underlying zoning of Public Accommodation
, encourages the development of lodges (accommodation units) and accessory eating,
drinking and retail establishments at a density of twenty-five dwelling units per acre. The
applicant is proposing to redevelopment the Austria Haus at a density of 35 dwelling units
per acre, with 4,440 sq. ft of commercial/retail space on the main level of the building.
Included in the density figure are twenty-two member-owned club units (fractional fee),
twenty-five hotel rooms (accommodation units) and one on-site manager's residence
(Type III, Employee Housing Unit).
The applicanYs proposal differs greatly from the existing use of the property. Currently,
the Austria Haus includes thirty-six accommodation units, and one dwelling unit, equaling
nineteen dwelling units per acre, a restaurant and a limited amount of commercial/retail
space on the east end of the building. Parking at the Austria Haus is accommodated by
a twenty-five space surface parking lot. Of the twenty-five spaces, fifteen are considered
legal, non-conforrning parking spaces. The other ten spaces are off-site and are not
considered legal parking spaces for zoning purposes. An informal loading/delivery/trash
area exists on the west end of the building.
Employee Housing Requirements
As indicated in a number of the goals and objectives of the Town's Master Plans,
providing affordable housing for employees is a critical issue which should be addressed
through the planning process for Special Development District proposals. In reviewing
the Austria Haus proposal for employee housing needs, staff relied on the Town of Vail
Employee Housing Report.
The Employee Housing Report, was prepared for the Town by the consulting firm Rosall,
Remmen and Cares. The report provides the recommended ranges of employee housing
units needed based on the type of use and the amount of floor area dedicated to each
use. Utilizing the guidelines prescribed in the Employee Housing Report, the staff
analyzed the incremental increase of employees (square footage per use), that result
from the Austria Haus redevelopment. A copy of the " Suqgested Emplovment
9
Cateaories and Ranges for Vail Ex~ressed as Emplovees per 1000 Sauare FeeY' has
been attached for reference.
The figures identified in the Housing Report are based on surveys of commercial-use
employment needs of the Town of Vail and other mountain resort communities. For
comparison purposes, Telluride, Aspen and Whistler B.C. all have "employment
generation" ordinances requiring developers to provide affordable housing for a
percentage of the "new" employees resulting from commercial development. "New"
employees are defined as the incremental increase in employment needs resulting from
commercial redevelopment. Each of the communities assesses a different percentage of
affordable housing a developer must provide for the "new" employees. For example,
Telluride requires developers to provide housing for 40% (0.40) of the "new" employees,
Aspen requires that 60% (0.60) of the "new" employees are provided housing and
Whistler requires that 100% (1.00) of the "new" employees be provided housing by the
developer. In comparison, Vail has conservatively determined that developers shall
provide housing for 15% (0.15) or 30% (0.30) of the "new" employees resulting from
commercial development. When a project is proposed to exceed the density allowed by
the underlying zone district, the 30% (0.30) figure is used in the calculation. If a project is
proposed at, or below, the density allowed by the underlying zone district, the 15% (0.15)
figure is used. The Austria Haus Special Development District proposal exceeds the
density permitted by the underlying zone district, and therefore, the 30% figure shall be
used.
According to the applicant, in 1997, Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., will need to employ 36
individuals to operate the existing Austria Haus. This employee figure takes into account
the maximum staffing requirement for the Christmas and President's Day weeks. Of the
36 individuals, five are needed to staff the front desk, 13 are required for housekeeping
purposes, 16 are needed to operate the bar and restaurant, and the remaining two
individuals are needed to provide other facilities support functions.
Sonnenalp Properties, Inc. has provided proposed employment figures for the operation
of the redeveloped Austria Haus. Sonnenalp Properties, Inc. estimates a need for
approximately 32 employees, plus an unknown retail need. Excluding retail, this figure
indicates a slight reduction in the employment need. The reduction in employment need
is due to the removal of the bar and restaurant operation from the Austria Haus. After
redevelopment, the Sonnenalp will only be providing continental food service to the
guests of the Austria Haus. A copy of-the "Austria-Haus Staffing Roster" has been
- attached for reference.
EMPLOYEE HOUSING GENERATION ANALYSIS
The staff analysis below indicates the top, the middle and the bottom of the ranges
recommended by the Town of Vail Employee Housing Report, as well as a staff
recommended figure which was used in determining the employee housing needs of the
Austria Haus. A summary of the Employee Housing Generation Analysis is as follows:
10
Bottom of Range Calculations:
a) Retail/Service Commercial = 3,660 sq. ft. @(5/1000 sq. ft.) =18.3 employees
b) Office: Real Estate = 780 sq. ft. @(6/1000 sq. ft.) = 4.7 employees
c) Lodging* = 25 units @(0.25/room) = 6.2 employees
d) Multi-Family (club units) = 22 units @(0.4/unit) = 8.8 employees
'
Total =38.0 emplayees .
(-36 existing employees) = 2 employees
(X 0.30 multiplier) = 1 nevv employee
ilAiddle ofi Ftange Calculations:
a) Retail/Service Commercial = 3,660 sq. ft. @(6.5/1000 sq. ft.)=23.8 employees
b) Office: Real Estate = 780 sq. ft. @(7.5/1,000sq. ft.) = 5.9 employees
c) Lodging° = 25 units @(0.75/room) =18.7 employees
d) Multi-Family (club units) = 22 units @(0.4/unit) = 8.8 employees
Total =57.2 employees
(-36 existing employees) =22 employees
(X 0.30 multiplier) = 7 new employees
Top of Fiange Calculations: _
a) Retail/Service Commercial = 3,660 sq. ft. @(8/1000 sq. ft.) : 29.3 employees
b) Office: Real Estate = 780 sq. ft. @(9/1000 sq. ft.) = 7.0 employees
c) Lodging" = 25 units @(1.25/room) =31.2 employees
d) Multi-Family (club units) = 22 units @(0.4/unit) = 8.8 employees
Total =76.3 employees
(-36 existing employees) =41 employees
(X 0.30 multiplier) =93 new employees
11
S*aff Recommended Range Calculations:
The staff believes that the Austria Haus redevelopment will create a need for 34 additional
employees. Of the 34 additional employees, at least 11 employees (30%) will need to be
provided deed-restricted housing by the developers of the Austria Haus. The staff
recommended range is based on:
1. the type of retail and office use proposed in the commercial space within the
Austria Haus; .
2. the size of the Austria Haus lodging component; and -
3. the high-level of services and amenities proposed by the developers for the
guests of the Austria Haus. .
a) Retail/Service Commercial = 3,660 sq. ft. 9(6.5/1000 sq. ft.)=23.8 employees
(middle of range)
b) Office: real estate = 780 sq. ft. 9(7.5/1000 sq. ft.) = 5.9 employees
(middle of range)
c) Lodging" = 25 units @(1.25/room) =31.2 employees
(top of range)
d) Multi-Family (club units) = 22 units @(0.4/unit) = 8.8 employees
(range does not vary)
~ Total =69.7 employees
(-36 existing employees) =34 employees
(X 0.30 multiplier) =11 new employees
'Lodging has a particularty large variation of employees per room, depending upon factors such as size of facility and level of
service/support services and amenities provided.
Depending upon the size of the employee housing unit provided, it is possible to have up
to two employees per bedroom. For example, a two-bedroom unit in the size range of
450 - 900 square feet, is possible of accommodating three to four employees. These
figures are consistent with the requirements for the Type III employee housing units
outlined in the Municipal Code.
The applicant has indicated the many of the Austria Haus' operational and functional
needs will be met by combining services with ihe Sonnenalp Bavaria Haus. For example,
the following services will be shared with the Bavaria Haus:
¦ Marketing and Sales
¦ Accounting
¦ Reservations
¦ Laundry Facilities
¦ Room Service
¦ Employee Cafeteria
¦ Human Resources
¦ Purchasing
¦ Trash Removal 12
While it makes sense from a oper.ational standpoint for the Austria Haus to share certain
operational and functional needs with the Bavaria Haus, there is some question as to
whether the Austria Haus should be required to be a stand-alone operation. Staff further
questions how the delivery of goods (linens, trash, food, etc.) will be accomplished and
whether an adequate amount of common storage space for housekeeping purposes is
being provided. The use of East Meadow Drive for the delivery of goods and services has
been increasing, resulting in pedestrian conflicts and traffic congestion, and therefore,
additional delivery vehicle traffic should be avoided. Staff would recommend that the
applicant address these issues and concerns with the PEC.
Overall, staff believes that the density and uses proposed by the applicant for the Austria _
Haus do not conflict with the compatibility, efficiency or workability of the surrounding.
uses and/or activities. In fact, staff feels that the proposed Austria Haus redevelopment
will enhance the existing uses and activities in the Village.
C. Compliance with par6cing and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.52. of
4he Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Parking and loading requirements for development are established in Chapter 18.52 of
the Municipal Code. The parking and loading requirements are based on the square
footage of the uses proposed within a building. Based on the square footage of the uses
proposed by the applicant, 79.26 parking spaces and one loading/delivery berth are
required on-site. The Municipal Code allows "grandfathering" of the existing legal non-
conforming parking spaces. Currently, fifteen legal, non-conforming parking spaces exist
` on the property. Therefore, the parking requirement for the proposed Austria Haus
redevelopment is 64.26 new parking spaces. The applicant is proposing an underground
parking structure designed to accommodate forty-eight parking spaces and an enclosed
trash facility. This leaves 16.26 additional parking spaces required. The applicant is
proposing to meet the additional parking requirement by paying into the Town of Vail
Parking Fund. Parking spaces are currently valued at $16,333.38. The cost per parking
space will increase on January 1, 1997, as the figure is adjusted based on the Consumer
Price Index. The applicant will be required to pay-in-lieu at the designated rate, at the
time of building permit application. The Town of Vail Finance Department states that the
1997 adjusted rate is not yet available. It is believed the adjusted rate.will be available by
March 1, 1.997.
The applicant is proposing one loading/delivery berth in the front entry drop-off area,
located on the north side of the building, adjacent to East Meadow Drive. Much of the .
drop-off area is within Town of Vail right-of-way. Staff recognizes that this area is
conveniently located near the entrances to the front desk and the commercial/retail
shops, however, we feel that the use of the drop-off area may be compromised by the
loading and delivery of goods. In staff's opinion, the front entry drop-off area should be
used by the guests of the Austria Haus. Staff believes that trying to accommodate
loading and delivery in this area will result in conflicts between guests, vehicles accessing
the parking structure, and delivery trucks. Staff would recommend that the applicant
revisit the alternative of providing the loading and delivery facility in the underground
parking structure. Staff understands this is not the desire of the owners of the Village
Center Condominiums, yet we believe the impact can be mitigated with appropriate
screening.
13
D. Conformity with the applicabie elements of the Vail Comprehensive Pian, Town
policies and Urban Design Plan. _ Vail Land Use Pian
The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to be used as the Town's policy
guidelines during the review process of establishing a new Special Development District.
Staff has reviewed the Vail Land Use Plan and believes the following policies are relevant
to the review of this proposal:
. 1. General Growth/Development . . .
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve
both the visitor and the permanent resident.
1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water, and other natural
resources should be protected as the Town grows.
1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgrade whenever
. possible. .
1.4 The original theme of the old Village Core should be carried into new
. development in the Village Core through continued implementation of the
Urban Design Guide Plan.
1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing
developed areas (infill).
1.13 Vail recognizes its stream tract as being a desirable land feature as well -as its potential for public use.
3. - Cvmmercial
-3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more efficiently.
3.2 The Village and Lionshead are the best location for hotels to serve the
future needs of the destination skier.
3.4 Commercial growth should be concentrated in existing commercial areas to accommodate both local and visitor needs.
4. Villaae Core/Lionshead
4.1 Future commercial development should continue to occur primarily in
existing commercial areas. Future commercial development in the Core
areas needs to be carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery.
4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing
character of each area is preserved through the implementation of the
Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan.
14
~ Residential
5.1 Quality timeshare units should be accommodated to help keep occupancy
rates up.
Staff believes the proposed establishment of the new Special Development District (#35)
is in concert with the goals and policies of the Vail Land Use Plan as outlined above.
Vail Villaae Master Plan
The Vail Village Master Plan is intended to serve as a guide to the staff, review boards . .
and Town Council in analyzing future proposals for development in Vail Village and in
legislating effective ordinances to deal with the such development. The staff has
identified the following goals, objectives and-policies as being relevant to this proposal:
Goal #1 Encourage high quality redevelopment vvhile preserving the unique
architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of
community and identity.
1.1 Obi.ective: Implement a consistent Development Review Process to
reinforce the character of the Village.
1.1.1 Policv: Development and improvement projects approved in
. the Village shall be consistent with the goals,
objectives, policies and design considerations as
outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban
Design Guide Plan.
1.2 Objective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential
and commercial facilities.
1.2.1 Policv: Additional development may be allowed as
identified by the action plan as is consistent with the
. Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide
Plan.
- 1.3 Obiective: Enhance new development and redevelopment through
public improvements done by private developers working in
cooperation with the Town.
1.3.1 Policv: Public improvements shall be developed with the
participation of the private sector working with the
Town.
Goal #2 To gos4er a strong tourist indus4ry and promote year-round economic
health and viability for the Village and for the cotnmunity as a whole.
2.1 Objective: Recognize the variety of land uses found in the 10 sub-
areas throughout the Village and allow for development that
is compatible with these established land use patterns.
15
2 3 Objective: Increase the number of residential units available for short-
term, overnight accommodations.
2.3.1 Policy: The development of short-term accommodation
units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that
are developed above existing density levels are
required to be designed or managed in a manner
that makes them available for short-term overnight
rental.
2.4 Objective: Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial
activity where compatible with existing land uses.
2.5 Objective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation ar,d
- maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to
better serve the needs of our guests.
2.5.1 Policv: Recreation amenities, common areas, meeting
facilities and other amenities shall be preserved and
enhanced as a part of any redevelopment of lodging
properties.
2.6 Objective: Encourage the development of affordable housing units
through the efforts of the private sector.
2.6.1 Policv: Employee housing units may be required as part of
any new or redeveloped project requesting density
over that allowed by existing zoning.
Goal #3 To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience throughout the Village.
3.1 Objective: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by
_ landscaping and other improvements.
3.1:1 Policy: Private development pcojects shall incorporate
- streetscape improvements (such as paver
treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating
areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
3.1.3 Policv: Flowers, trees, water features and other
landscaping shall be encouraged throughout the
Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public
areas.
3.2 Objective: Minimize the amount of vehicular traffic in the Village to the
greatest extent possible.
3.2.1 Policv: Vehicular traffic will be eliminated or reduced to
absolutely minimal necessary levels in the
pedestrianized areas of the Village.
16
3.4 Oblective: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways
and accessible green space areas, including pocket parks
and stream access.
3.4.2 Policv: Private development projects shall be required to
incorporate new sidewalks along streets adjacent to
the project as designated in the Vail Village Master
Plan and/or Recreation Trails Master Plan.
Goal #4 To preserve exis4ing open space areas and expand green space
opportunities. ,
4.1 Objective: Improve existing open space areas and create new plazas
with green space and pocket parks. Recognize the
different roles of each type of open space in forming the
overall fabric of the Village.
4.1.4 Policv: Open space improvements, including the addition of
accessible green space as described or graphically
shown in the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Urban
Design Guide Plan, will be required in conjunction
with private infill or redevelopment projects.
_ Goal #5 9ncrease and improve the capacity, efficiency and aesthetics of the
Yransportation and circulation system throughout the Village.
5.1 Objective: Meet parking demands with public and private parking
facilities.
5.1.1 Policv: For new development that is located outside of the
Commercial Core 1 Zone District, on-site parking
shall be provided (rather than paying into the
parking fund) to meet any additional parking
- demand as required by the Zoning Code.
5.1.5 Policy: Redevelopment projects shall be strongly
encouraged to provide underground or visually concealed parking.
Goal #6 To insure 4he continued improvement of the vital operational elements
of the Village.
6.1 Objective: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new
development.
Vail Village Master Plan and Building Height Plan
Generally speaking, it is the goal of the Building Height Plan to maintain the concentration
of low-scale buildings in the Core area, while positioning larger buildings along the
northern periphery. According to the Conceptual Building Height Plan contained within
the Vail Village Master Plan, the Austria Haus is located within an area proposed to have
building heights of a maximum range of three to four stories. A building story is defined
as 9' of height, not including the roof. ,
17
Vail Villaae Master Plan Action Plan
According to the Action Plan, the Austria Haus property is an area intended for
residential/lodging infill along the south side of the property and commercial infill along
the north side of the property.
According to the Vail Village Master Plan, the Austria Haus property is located within
mixed-use sub-area #1-8, Sonnenalp (Austria Haus)/Slifer Square:
"Commercial infill along East Meadow Drive to provide a stronger edge to street -
and commercial activity generators to reinforce the pedestrian loop throughout the _
. Village. Focus of infill is to provide improvements to pedestrian circulation with
. separated walkway including buffer, along East Meadow Drive. Accommodating
on-site parking and maintaining the bus route along East Meadow Drive are two
~ significant constraints that must be addressed. One additional floor of
residential/lodging may also be accommodated on this site. Specific emphasis
should be placed on the following Vail Village Master Plan objectives: 2.3, 2.4,
2.6, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, 5.1, 6.1."
Vail Villa.ge Design Considerations
The Town of Vail adopted the Vail Village Design Considerations in 1980. The Design
Considerations were revised in 1993. The Design Considerations are considered an
integral part of the Vail Village Urban Design Plan. The Design Considerations are
intended to:
? guide growth and change in ways that will enhance and preserve the essential
qualities of the Village; and
? serve as design guidelines instead of rigid rules of development; and
? help influence the form and design of buildings.
The Vail Village Design Considerations are divided into two categories (urban.design
considerations and architectural/landscape considerations):
1. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
These considerations relate to general, large-scale land use planning issues, as well as form
considerations which affect more than one property or even whole areas. These considerations
are primarily the purview of the Planning.and Environmental Commission. -
A. PEDESTRIANIZATION
A major objective for Vail Village is to encourage pedestrian circulation through an
interconnected network of safe, pleasant pedestrian ways. Many of the improvements
recognized in the Urban Design Guide Plans, and accompanying Design Considerations,
are to reinforce and expand the quality of pedestrian walkways throughout the Village.
Since vehicular traffic cannot be removed from certain streets (bus routes, delivery
access), a totally care-free pedestrian system is not achievable throughout the entire
Village. Therefore, several levels of pedestrianization have been identified. The level of
pedestrianization most appropriate for the proposed Austria Haus redevelopment is the
joint vehicle/pedestrian use of the roadway. 18
0 taff Response:
The applicant has met on numerous occasions with the Town staff to discuss pedestrian
improvements. The staff has concluded that the improvements recommended for East
Meadow Drive in the 1991 Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan should be implemented.
This includes a reduction in street width from 30 feet to 26 feet (14 foot bus lane and 12
foot attached, paver pedestrian walk). The applicant is further proposing to construct a
12 - 20 foot wide, heated pedestrian walkway immediately adjacent to the north side of
" fhe building. Staff believes that these improvements reinforce and significantly improve the pedestrian walkways throughout the Village by providing places for people to walk _
without forcing them into the bus lane. The creative use of concrete unit pavers
. emphasizes the pedestrian character and offers a clear and attractive pedestrian route.
The retail space on the main level of the Austria Haus closes the commercial loop from
Slifet Square to Village Center. B. VEHICLE PENETRATION
To maximize to the extent possible, all non-resident traffic should be routed along the
Frontage Road to Vail Village/Lionshead Parking Structures.
In conjunction with pedestrianization objectives, major emphasis is focused upon
reducing auto penetration into the center of the Village. Vail Road and Vail Valley Drive
will continue to serve as major routes for service and resident access to the Village.
Road constrictions, traffic circles, signage, and other measures are indicated in the Guide
Plans to visually and physically discourage all but essential vehicle penetration upon the
Frontage Road. Alternative access points and private parking relocation, where feasible,
should be considered to further reduce traffic conflicts in the Village.
a Staff Response:
The redevelopment of the Austria Haus will increase vehicular traffic on Village Center
Road. According to the Environmental Impact Assessment-Austria Haus
Redevelopment, prepared by Design Workshop, Inc.:
"A slight increase automobile traffic is expected because of the projected increase
in the number of visitors generated annually by the project. What is not known,
however, is how many of these additional guests will arrive by car; it is likely the
largest number of guests will continue to arrive in the winter and that most will
arrive by van from the airport. Van deliveries will increase somewhat. Those
guests that arrive in their own car are likely to leave the car in the garage after
they arrive, as the center village location of the project eliminates the need for a
car. If there is a potential for congestion anywhere, it is most likely to be in the
small drop-off parking area in front of the building, where check-ins, deliveries and
last drivers may r,onverge. To some extent, this can be mitigated by improved
roadway directional signs, speedy guest valet service, careful management of
deliveries and incentives to encourage guests to leave their cars at home."
Along with the increase in automobile traffic, there will be an increase in delivery vehicle
traffic due to an increase in the commercial square footage on the property. The
applicants anticipate that deliveries to the retail shops will likely arrive via UPS or similar
types of couriers. Deliveries are to be accommodated in the drop-off area in the front of
the building. •
19
Staff agrees with Design Workshop's assessment of the potential traffic impacts. While
there will likely be an increase in traffic on Village Center Road, there will not be an
increase in traffic on the pedestrian portion of East Meadow Drive. The traffic control
gate located at the intersection of Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive will
continue to prohibit all vehicle traffic except Town of Vail buses. Staff feels the applicant
has addressed traffic issues to the extent possible.
C. STREETSCAPE FRAMEWORI(
To improve the quality of the walking experience and give continuity to the pedestrian
ways, as a continuous system, two general types of improvements adjacent to the walkways are considered:
. 1. Open space and landscaping, berms, grass, flowers and tree planting as a
soft, colorful framework linkage along pedestrian routes; and plazas and
park greenspaces as open nodes and focal points along those routes.
2. Infill commercial storefronts, expansion of existing buildings, or new infill
development to create new commercial activity generators to give
streetlife and visual interest, as attractions at key locations along
pedestrian routes.
It is not intended to enclose all Village streets with buildings as in the core areas. Nor is it
desirable to leave pedestrian streets in the open in somewhat undefined condition evident
in many other areas of Vail. Rather, it is desired to have a variety of open and enclosed
spaces, both built and landscaped, which create a strong framework for pedestrian walks,
as well as visual interest and activity.
• Staff Res op nse:
The Austria Haus redevelopment improves the streetscape framework through the
creation of new commercial activity and increases visual interest along East Meadow
Drive. As stated previously, staff believes the proposed redevelopment closes the critical
commercial loop in the Village and provides new street life where very little currently
exists.
_ D. STREET ENCLOSURE
While building facade heights should not be uniform from building to building, they should
provide a"comfortable" enclosure for the street.
Pedestrian streets are outdoor rooms, whose walls are formed by the buildings. The
shape and feel of these "rooms" are created by the variety of heights and massing (3-
dimensional variations), which give much of the visual interest and pedestrian scale
unique to Vail. Very general rules, about the perception of exterior spaces have been
developed by designers, based on the characteristics of human vision. They suggest
that:
"an external enclosure is most comfortable when its walls are approximately 1/2
as high as the width of the space enclosed; if the ratio falls to 1/4 or less, the
space seems unenclosed; and if the height is greater than the width it comes to
resemble a canyon".
20
in actual application, facades are seldom uniform in height on both sides of the street, nor
is this desired. Thus, some latitude is appropriate in the application of this 1/2 to 1 ratio.
Using the average facade height on both sides will generally still be a guide to the
comfortableness of the enclosure being created.
In some instances, the "canyon" effect is acceptable and even desirable. For example,
as a short connecting linkage between larger spaces, to give variety to the walking
experience. For sun/shade reasons it is often advantageous to orient any longer
segments in a north/south direction. Long canyon streets in an easUwest direction should
' generally be discouraged. . .
When exceptions to the general height criteria occur, special consideration should be given to create a well-defined ground floor pedestrian emphasis to overcome the
"cany,on" effect.
Canopies, awnings, arcades and building extensions can all create a pedestrian focus
and divert attention from the upper building heights and "canyon" effect.
0 Staff Response:
East Meadow Drive, and the pedestrian walkway adjacent to the Austria Haus, averages
approximately 50 feet in width. The Austria Haus (eaveline) adjacent to East Meadow
Drive and the pedestrian walkway is approximately 30 feet in height. Given that East
. Meadow Drive is enclosed only on one side, and the arcade and landscaping creates an
emphasis on the ground level of the building, staff believes the proposed Austria Haus
creates a"comfortable" enclosure of the street and does not create a"canyon" effect.
E. STREET EDGE
Buildings in the Village core should form a strong but irregular edge to the street.
Unlike many American towns, there are no standard setback requirements for buildings in
Vail Village. Consistent with the desire for intimate pedestrian scale, placement of
. portions of a building at or near the property line is allowed and encouraged to give strong
definition to the pedestrian streets.
- This is not to imply continuous building frontage along the property line. A strong street
edge is important for continuity, but perfectly aligned facades over too long a distance
tends to be monotonous. With only a few exceptions in the Village, slightly irregular
facade lines, building jogs, and landscaped areas, give the life to the street and visual
interest for pedestrian travel.
Where buildings jog to create activity pockets, other elements can be used to continue
the street edge: low planter walls, tree planting, raised sidewalks, texture changes in
ground surface, arcades, raised decks.
Plazas, patios, and green areas are important focal points for gathering, resting, orienting
and should be distributed throughout the Viltage with due consideration to spacing, sun
access, opportunities for views and pedestrian activity.
21
• Staff Response: •
Initialiy, the Austria Haus design lacked the irregular street edge of other properties in Vail
Village. The applicant, at the request of the staff and PEC, has attempted to introduce a
more irregular street edge through the horizontal stepping of the building on the east and
west ends. The east end of the building has been stepped back 10 feet from the property
line and the northeast corner has been cutback an additional 3-1/2 feet, opening this end
of building up to Slifer Square. The front entry tower was moved to the west end of the
building and the west-end of the building was stepped towards the street. While it would
be the staff's desire to see more stepping in the building, staff recognizes the constraints _
in doing so. Staff believes the irregular configuration of the landscape planters in firont of
the building helps to lessen the rather long, linear and uninterrupted street edge along the
center portion of the Austria Haus.
F. ` BUILDING HEIGHT
Vail Village is perceived as a mix of two and three.story facades, although there are also
four and five story buildings. The mix of building heights gives variety to the street, which
is desirable. The height criteria are intended to encourage height in massing variety and
to discourage uniform building heights along the street.
• Staff Response:
. As discussed previously, the Austria Haus exceeds the allowable building height
prescribed for the Public Accommodation Zone District. However, staff does not feel that
the proposed height of the Austria Haus is excessive, given the location of the building in
relation to the Village and the height of the buildings on the adjoining properties. The
Mountain Haus (to the east) has an existing roof ridge of 74' above grade. The
approximate height of the Village Center Condominiums (to the west) is as follows:
Building A(closest to the Austria Haus = 45'; Building B= 78'; and Building C= 56'.
The Austria Haus roof steps down on both ends of the building, reducing the creation of a
"canyon" along the west property line and resulting in a building that is less obtrusive (on
Slifer-Square) on the east end. The applicant has submitted a scale model of the new
structure in_ its Village Core context and this model will be available for use by the PEC
during the final hearing.
G. VIEWS AND FOCAL POINTS
Vail's mountain/valley setting is a fundamental part of its identity. Views of the
mountains, ski slopes, creeks and other natural features are reminders to our visitors of
the mountain environment and, by repeated visibility, are orientation' reference points.
Certain building features also provide important orientation references and visual focal
points. The most significant view corridors in the Village have been adopted as part of
Chapter 18.73 of the Vail Municipal Code. The view corridors adopted should not be
considered exhausted. When evaluating a development proposal, priority should be
given to an analysis of the impacted project on public views. Views that should be
preserved originate from either major pedestrian areas or public spaces, and include
views of the ski mountain, the Gore Range, the Clock Tower, the Rucksack Tower and
ather important man-made and natural elements that contribute to the sense of place
associated with Vail. These views, which have been adopted by ordinance, were chosen
due to their significance, not only from an aesthetic standpoint, but also as orientation
reference points for pedestrians. Development in Vail Village shall not encroach into any
adopted view corridor, unless approved under Chapter 18.73. Adopted corridors are
22
listed in Chapter 18.73 of the Vait Municipal Code. Whether affecting adopted view
corridors or not, the impact of proposed development on views from public ways and
public spaces must be identified and considered where appropriate.
0 Staff Response:
Although not directly impacting one of the five adopted view corridors, as listed in Chapter
18.73 of the Vail Municipal Code, the height of the building will have impacts from the Vail
Transportation Center (transit terminal) and will also impact views from the west and
central stairs. Public views of the Village (roofline of structures) will be blocked from
these areas, however, views of Vail Mountain wilf remain. Overall, staff feels that the benefits providing a comfortable enclosure to the street, and completing the pedestrian
and retail connection from Crossroads to the Covered Bridge is positive. Staff feels that
the completion of this pedestrian connection is in compliance with Goal #3 of the Vail
Village Master Plan:
"To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience
throughout the Village."
H. SERVICE AND DELIVERY
Any building expansion should preserve the functions of existing service alleys. The few
service alleys that exist in the Village are extremely important to minimizing vehicle
. congestion on pedestrian ways. The use of, and vehicular access to, those alleys should
not be eliminated except where functional alternatives are not provided.
In all new and remodeled construction, delivery which avoids or reduces impacts on
pedestrian ways should be explored; and adopted whenever practical, for immediate or
future use. Rear access, basement and below ground delivery corridors reduce
congestion. Weather protection increases delivery efficiency substantially.
Below grade delivery corridors are found in a few buildings in Vail Village (SitzmarWGore
Creek Plaza, Village Center, Vail Village Inn). Consideration should be given to extending
these corridors, where feasible, and the creation of new ones. As buildings are
constructed or remodeled, the opportunity may exist to develop segments of a future
sysfem. - -
0 Staff Response:
Through the course of the review of the Austria Haus redevelopment proposal, several
loading and delivery options were explored.
The applicant had originally proposed to provide one loading and delivery berth in the
underground parking structure. However, concerns were expressed by the Village Center
Condominium owners that they would be negatively impacted by the noise generated
from the delivery vehicles, since the access to the underground location was immediately
adjacent to their units.
The applicant had also explored the possibility of gaining underground access to their
structure through the Village Center garage. It was determined that defivery vehicles
could not enter through Village Center due to height limitations in the garage.
As mentioned previously, the applicant is pro.posing to provide for loading/delivery in the
front entry drop-off area. The applicant anticipates that deliveries to the retail/commercial
shops will arrive via UPS or similar types of courier. Staff continues to believe that this
23
location may negatively impact the pedestrian use of this area of East Meadow Drive and
suggests the applicant coniinue to explore placing the loading and delivery berth in the
underground structure, as originally contempfated.
1. SUN/SHADE
Due to Vail's alpine climate, sun is an important comfort factor, especially in winter, fall
and spring. Shade areas have ambient temperatures substantially below those of
adjacent direct sunlight areas. On all but the warmest of summer days, shade can easi4y
lower temperatures below comfortable levels and thereby, negatively impact use of those areas. -
All new or expanded buildings should not substantially increase the spring and fall
shadow line (March 21 - September 23) on adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
In all.building construction, shade shall be considered in massing and overall height
consideration. Notwithstanding, sun/shade considerations are not intended to restrict
building height allowances, but rather to influence the massing of buildings. Limited
height exceptions may be granted to meet this criteria.
• Staff Response:
Although the proposed height of the building will diminish the amount of sun, and likewise
increase shading, along East Meadow Drive (north side of the project), the provision of
heated public walkways effectivefy mitigates this consideration, thus providing ice-free
and snow-free sidewalks. Additionally, the "opening up" of Slifer Square will insure
adequate light, air and open space to a public gathering space. Overall, staff believes the
applicanYs proposal complies with the above-described considerations.
2. ARCHITECTURE/LANDSCAPE CONSIDERATIONS
ROOFS
Where visible, roofs are often one af the most dominant architectural elements in any built
environment. In the Village, roof form, color and texture are visibly dominant, and generally
consistent, which tends to unify the building diversity to a great degree.
The current expression, and objective, for roofs in the Village is to form a consistently unifying
backdrop for the architecture and pedestrian streetscape, and to avoid roofs which tend to stand
out individually or distract visually from the overall character.
Roof Forms
Roofs within the Village are typically gable in form and of moderate-to-low pitch. Shed roofs are
frequently used for small additions to larger buildings. Free-standing shed roofs, butterfly roofs
and flat roofs, can be found in the Village, but they are generally considered to be out of
character and inappropriate. Hip roofs likewise, are rare and generally inconsistent with the
character of the Core Area. Towers are exceptions, in both form and pitch, to the general
criteria, but do have an established local vernacular-style which should be respected.
24
~ Staff Response
The roof form of the Austria Haus has been revised several times from what was
originally proposed. The original roof design of the Austria Haus had a significant amount
of flat roof area. The majority of flat roof has now been replaced with a sloping roof
leading to a more traditional ridge. Three areas of flat roof, compromising a total of
approximately 444 square feet, remain on the building. These flat roof portions break up
the ridge line, and provide locations for screened mechanical equipment (fans, vents, etc).
The addition of the sloping roof leading to a ridge increased the overall building height by
approximately three feet, since the roof pitch of 6/12 was not changed. The ends of the . , ridge have been "clipped", resulting in a hip roof form. While a hip roof is generally -
considered inconsistent with the character of the Village, the applicant believes this roof
form helps to reduce the mass of the building. The applicant had at one time provided
gable ends to both the east and west ends of the building, but has since "clipped" the
gable ends and lowered the roof eaveline at the request of the Village Center
Condominium owners.
Staff would like to see the ridge carried to the ends of the roof creating a gable end,
rather than a hip. However, staff recognizes that this roof form does tend to increase the
perceived height of the building, especially on the east and west ends. Staff will raise this
issue with the Design Review Board.
Pitch
Roof slopes in the Village typically range from 3/12 to 6/12, with slightly steeper pitches in limited
applications. Again, for visual consistency this general 3/12-6/12 range should be preserved.
0 Staff Response
The pitch of the proposed Austria Haus roof is 6/12 and is in compliance with this
guideline.
Overhanas
Generous roof overhangs are also an established architectural feature in the Village - a
traditional expression of shelter in atpine environments. Roof overhangs typically range from 3 to
6 feet on all edges. Specific design consideration should be given to protection of pedestrian
ways adjacent to buildings. Snow slides and runoff hazards can be reduced by roof orientation,
gutters, arcades, etc.
Overhang details are treated with varying degrees of ornamentation. Structural elements such
as roof beams are expressed beneath the overhangs, simply or decoratively carved. The roof
fascia is thick and wide, giving a substantial edge to the roof.
0 Staff Response
Staff suggests that the applicant increase the roof overhangs on the building. Currently, the overhangs vary from two feet to three feet. Staff would like to see all the roof
overhangs at least three feet. Again, staff will review this consideration with the Design
Review Board.
25
Compositions .
The intricate roofscape of the Village as a whole is the result of many individual simple roof
configurations. For any single building a varied, but simple composition of roof planes is
preferred to either a single or a complex arrangement of many roofs. As individual roofs become
more complex, the roof attracts visual attention away from the streetscape and the total
roofscape tends toward "busyness" rather than a backdrop composition.
• Staff Response
The roof form on the Austria Haus would be considered a simple composition of roof planes. Staff believes the roof composition proposed by the applicant is consistent with
the intent of this architectural consideration.
Stepped Roofs
As buildings are stepped to reflect existing grade changes, resulting roof steps should be made
where the height change will be visually significant. Variations which are too subtle appear to be
more stylistic than functional, and out of character with the more straight-forward roof design
typical in the Village.
• Staff Response '
The Austria Haus site is relatively flat (by Vail standards). While the building does not
need to step to follow the topography, vertical and horizontal steps have been
incorporated into the roof design. The vertical and horizontal steps provide a reduction in
the overall mass of the building and add to the architectural and visual interest of the
building.
Materials °
Wcod shakes, wood shingles, and built-up tar and gravel are almost exclusively used as roof
materials in the Village. For visual consistency, any other materials should have the appearance
of the above.
• Staff Response _
Most recently, wood shakes and wood shingles are being discouraged for use as a
roofing material due to fire safety concerns. At the recommendation of the Town of Vail
Fire Department, the staff has been encouraging developers to use gravel, asphalt, tile,
metal and other more fire-resistant roofing materials on new buildings.
The applicant is proposing to use reddish tiles on the roof of the Austria Haus. The tiles
will be similar in appearance to those used on the Sonnenalp Bavaria Haus. The staff
believes this is an appropriate roof material to use on this project.
Construction
Common roof problems and design considerations in this climate include:
- snowslides onto pedestrian walks
- gutters freezing
- roof dams and water infiltration
- heavy snow loads
26
Careful attention to these functional details is recommended, as well as familiarity with the local
building code, proven construction details, and Town ordinances.
For built-up roofs, pitches of 4/12 or steeper do not hold gravel well. For shingle roofs, pitches of
4/12 or shallower often result in ice dams and backflow leakage under the shingles.
Cold-roof construction is strongly preferred, unless warm-roof benefits for a specific application
can be demonstrated. Cold-roofs are double-roofs which insulate and prevent snow melt from
internal building heat. By retaining snow on the roof, many of the problems listed can be
reduced. Periodic snow removal will be required and should be anticipated in the design.
Roof gutters tend to, ice-in completely and become ineffective in the Vail climate, especially in shaded north-side locations. Heating the interior circumference with heat-tape elements or other
devices is generally necessary to assure adequate run-off control in colder months.
o Staff Response:
The applicant is proposing a cold-roof construction atop the Austria Haus. Through the
review of a building permit, staff will ensure the roof construction complies with the
standards prescribed for the Vail climate.
F,4CADES
Materials
Stucco, brick, wood (and glass) are the primary building materials found in the Village. While not
wishing to restrict design freedom, existing conditions show that within this small range of
materials much variation and individuality are possible while preserving a basic harmony. Too
many diverse materials weaken the continuity and repetition which unifies the streetscape.
Of the above materials, stucco is the most consistently used material. Most of the buildings in
the Village exhibit some stucco, and there are virtually no areas where stucco is entirely absent.
It is intended to preserve the dominance of stucco by its use in portions, at least, of all new
facades, and by.assuring that other materials are not used to the exclusion of stucco in any sub-
area within the Village.
- ~ Staff Response The exterior materials proposed by the applicant are a combination of stone, stucco and
wood. No one material is proposed to dominate the exterior of the Austria Haus. Staff
believes the applicant has complied with this particular architectural consideration.
Color
There is greater latitude in the use of color in the Village, but still a discernible consistency within
a general range of colors.
For wood surfaces, trim or siding, darker color tones are preferred - browns, greys, blue-greys,
dark olive, slate-greens, etc. Stucco colors are generally light - white, beige, pale-gold, or other
light pastels. Other light colors could be appropriate, as considered on a case-by-case basis.
Sright colors (red, orange, blues, maroon, etc.) should be avoided for major wall planes, but can
be used effectively (with restraint) for decorative trim, wall graphics, and other accent elements.
27
Generally, to avoid both "busyness," and weak visual interest, the variety of major wall colors
should not exceed four, nor be less than two.
A color/material change between the ground floor and upper floors is a common and effective
reinforcement of the pedestrian scale of the street.
• Staff Response
The applicant has proposed an exterior building color that is compatible with the color of
the existing buildings in the vicinity of the Austria Haus. Staff would like to point out that
the applicant is required to obtain Design Review Board (DRB) approval prior to construction and that any concerns of the PEC on this topic will be brought to the.
attention of the DRB.
Transparency
Pedestrian scale is created in many ways, but a major factor is the openness, attractiveness, and
generally public character of ihe ground floor facade of adjacent buildings. Transparent store
fronts are "people attractors," opaque or solid walls are more private, and imply "do not
approach."
On pedestrian-oriented streets such as in the Village, ground floor commercial facades are
proportionately more transparent than upper floors. Upper floors are typically more residential,
. private and thus less open.
As a measure of transparency, the most characteristic and successful ground floor facades
range from 55% to 70% of the total length of the commercial facade. Upper floors are often the
converse, 30%-45% transparent.
Examples of transparency (lineal feet of glass to lineal feet of facade) on ground level.
- Covered Bridge Building 58%
- Pepi's Sports 71 %
Gastliof Gramshammer 48%
- The L.odge 66%
- Golden Peak House 62'/0
- Casino Building 30% .
- Gorsuch Building 51%
• Staff Response
A measure of transparency of the Austria Haus (north and east elevations) indicates that
. 46% (120 lineal feet of glass exists along the 263 lineal feet of building) of the ground
floor facade is transparent. Staff recommends that a minimum of 25 lineal feet of
additional glass (55%) be added to the ground floor. This would make the Austria Haus
generally consistent with the transparency of other buildings in the Village.
Windows
In addition ta the general degree of transparency, window details are an important source af
pedestrian scale-giving elements. The size and shape of windows are often a response to the
function of the adjacent street. For close-up, casual, pedestrian viewing windows are typically
sized to human dimensions and characteristics of human vision. (Large glass-wall store-fronts
28
suggest uninterrupted viewing, as from a moving car. The sense of intimate pedestrian scale is
diminished). Ground floor display windows are typically raised slightly 18 inches ± and do not
extend much over 8 feet above the walkway level. Ground floors, which are noticeably above or
below grade, are exceptions.
The articulation of the window itself is still another element in giving pedestrian scale (human-
related dimensions). Glass areas are usually subdivided to express individual window elements -
and are further subdivided by mullions into small panes - which is responsible for much of the
old-world charm of the Village. Similarly, windows are most often clustered in banks, juxtaposed
. with plain wall surfaces to give a pleasing rhythm. Horizontal repetition of single window
elements, especially over long distances, should be avoided. '
Large single pane windows occur in the Village, and provide some contrast, as long as they are
generally consistent in form with other windows. Long continuous glass is out of character. Bay,
bow and box windows are common window details, which further variety and massing to facades
- and are encouraged.
Reflective glass, plastic panes, and aluminum or other metal frames are not consistent in the
Village and should be avoided. Metal-clad or pfastic-clad wood frames, having the appearance
of painted wood have been used successfulfy and are acceptable.
o Staff Response
, The Austria Haus proposal is in compliance with the above-described design
consideration. Staff believes the use of dormers with windows, bay windows and
windows with mullions adds to the architectural charm and visual integriry of the Austria
Haus. Staff recommends that the use of mullions in the windows be a condition of
approval.
Doors
Like windows, doors are important to character and scale-giving architectural elements. They
should also be somewhat transparent (on retail commercial facades) and consistent in detailing
with windows and other facade elements.
Doors with glass contribute to overall facade transparency. Due to the visibility of people and
merchandise inside, windowed doors are somewhat more effective in drawing people inside to
retail commercial facades. Although great variations exist, 25-30% ± transparency is felt to be a
minimum transparency objective. Private residences, lodges, restaurants, and other non-retail
establishments have different visibility and character needs, and doors should be designed
accordingly. Sidelight windows are also a means of introducing door-transparency as a
complement or substitute for door windows.
Articulated doors have the decorative quality desired for Vail. Flush doors, light aluminum
frames, plastic applique elements all are considered inappropriate. As an expression of entry,
and sheltered welcome, protected entry-ways are encouraged. Doorways may be recessed,
extended, or covered.
0 Staff Response
Staff believes the applicant's proposal complies with the above-described criteria.
29
Trim
Prominent wood trim is also a unifying feature in the Village. Particularly at ground floor levels,
doors and windows have strong, contrasting framing elements, which tie the various elements
together in one composition. Windows and doors are treated as strong visual features. Glass-
wall detailing for either is typically avoided.
• Staff Response:
. Staff believes the applicant's proposal complies with the above-described criteria. DECKS APVD PATIOS
Dining decks and patios, when properly designed and sited, bring people to the streets,
opportunities to look and be looked at, and generally contribute to the liveliness of a busy street-
making a richer pedestrian experience than if those streets were empty.
A review of successful decks/patios in Vail reveals several common characteristics:
- direct sunlight from 11:00 - 3:00 increases use by many days/year and protects from
wind.
- elevated to give views in the pedestrian walk (and not the reverse).
- physical separation from pedestrian walk.
, - overhang gives pedestrian scale/shelter.
Decks and patios shoufd be sited and designed with due consideration to:
- sun
- wind
- views
- pedestrian activity
• Staff Response:
The majority of the decks and patios on the Austria Haus are located on the south side of
the building, facing Gore Creek. These decks and patios are for the use of the guests of
the Austria Haus and not the general public. Staff does believe, however, that the arcade
designed along the north side of the building will provide shelter from the elements for
pedestrians using the heated walkway.
BALCONIES
Balconies occur on almost all buildings in the Village which have at least a second level facade
wall. As strong repetitive features they:
- give scale to buildings.
- give life to the street (when used).
- add variety to building forms.
- provide shelter to pathways below.
30 ,
~ Staff Resp4nse
The majority of the balconies on the Austria Haus are located on the south side of the
building. Several french balconies have been incorporated into the design of the north
side of the building on the upper floors. Staff would like to discuss the design and
repetition of the balconies on the south elevation with the PEC and the applicant. Staff
would like to see less repetition of the balconies, particularly on the south elevation.
, Color .
. They contrast in color (dark) with the building, typically matching the trim colors. -
0 Staff Response
Like the exterior color of the building, the DRB will be reviewing this aspect of the
proposal.
Size
They extend far enough from the building to cast a prominent shadow pattern. Balconies in Vait
are functional as will as decorative. As such, they should be of useable size and located to
encourage use. Balconies less than six feet deep are seldom used, nor are those always in
. shade, not oriented to views or street life.
0 Staff Response
Staff believes this criteria relates to staff's concerns regarding balconies mentioned
above.
Mass
They are commonly massive, yet semi-transparent, distinctive from the building, yet allowing the
building to be somewhat visible behind. Solid balconies are found occasionally, and tend to be
too dominant obscuring the building architecture. Light balconies lack the visual impact which
ties the Village together.
0 Staff Response
The balconies on the Austria.Haus are proposed to be semi-transparent in appearance.
Materials
Wood balconies are by far the most common. Vertical structural members are the most
dominant visually, often decoratively sculpted. Decorative wrought iron balconies are also
consistent visually where the vertical members are close enough to create semi-transparency.
Pipe rails, and plastic, canvas or glass panels should be avoided.
31 ,
• Staff Response
The material to be used in the construction of the balconies on the Austria Haus 'is wood,
with vertical structural members. A detail of the railing will be reviewed by the DRB.
ACCENT ELEMENTS
The life, and festive quality of the Village is given by judicious use of accent elements which give
color, movement and contrast to the Village.
. Colorful accent elements consistent with existing character are encouraged, such. as: .
Awnings and canopies - canvas, bright color or stripes of two colors.
Flags, banners - hanging from buildings, poles, and even across streets for special
' occasions.
Umbrellas - over tables on outdoor patios.
Annual color flowers - in beds or in planters.
Accent lighting- buildings, plazas, windows, trees (even Christmas lights all winter).
Painted wall graphics - coats of arms, symbols, accent compositions, etc.
Fountains - sculptural, with both winter and summer character.
• Staff Response:
. Accent lighting on the building, annual flowers in containers and in the planting beds,
potted trees decorated with Christmas lights and irrigated flower boxes are proposed to
provide colorful accent elements on the Austria Haus. An additional accent symbol
(clock, crest, etc.) is proposed for the tower at the front entry. The final design has yet to
be determined.
LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS '
Landscape considerations include, but go beyond, the placement of appropriate plant materials.
- plant materials
- paving.
- retaining walls -
- street furniture (benches, kiosks, trash, etc.)
- lighting
- signage
Plant Materials
Opportunities for planting are not extensive in the Village, which places a premium on the plant
selection and design of the sites that do exist. Framework planting of trees and shrubs should
include both deciduous and evergreen species for year round continuity and interest.
Native plants are somewhat limited in variety, but are clearly best able to withstand the harsh
winter climate, and to tie the Village visually with its mountain setting.
32
Trees hrubs
Narrow-leaf cottonwood Willow
Balsam poplar pogwood
Aspen Serviceberry
Lodgepole pine Alpine currant
Colorado spruce Chokecherry
Subalpine fir Mugho pine
Potentilla
' Buffaloberry
~ Staff Response
A landscape plan has been submitted by the applicant. The landscape plan has been
developed with the assistance of Town staff, since a majority of the landscape
improvements are proposed on Town property. The proposed landscape design takes
into consideration factors such as the location of the plantings (sun/shade), maintenance,
clirnate, etc. Staff believes the landscape design for the Austria Haus complies with the
above-described criteria.
Pavin
The freeze/thaw cycle at this altitude virtually eliminates common site-cast concrete as a paving
. surface (concrete spall). High-strength concrete may work in selected conditions. Asphalt, brick
(on concrete or on sand), and concrete block appear to be best suited to the area.
In general, paving treatments should be coordinated with that of the adjacent public right-of-way.
The Town uses the following materials for all new construction:
- asphalt: general use pedestrian streets
- brick on concrete: feature areas (plazas, intersections, fountains, etc.)
0 Staff Response
The paving material used in the public areas around the Austria Haus will be the "Vail",
concre#e unit paver, laid in the "Vail-pattern" (herringbone). These surfaces will be
- heated and will include the access ramp to the parking structure, the front entry drop-off
area and the pedestrian walkway along the store fronts. The applicant has worked with
the Town staff in developing the design of improvements in the public right-of-way.
Retaininc~Walls
Retaining walls, to raise planting areas, often protects the landscape from pedestrians and
snowplows, and should provide seating opportunities:
Two types of material are already well established in the Village and should be utilized for
continuity:
- split-face moss rock veneer - Village Core pedestrian streets (typical).
- rounded cobble hidden mortar - in open space areas if above type not already
established nearby.
33
• Staff Response
No tandscape retaining walis are proposed in the construction of the Austria Haus. The
new landscape retaining walls proposed in Slifer Square will match the existing walls in
terms of both type of materials, and application.
Li h in
Light standards should be coordinated with those used by the Town in the public right-of-way.
• Staff Response
As part of the streetscape improvements along East Meadow Drive, the applicant will be
installing six new Village light fixtures. The number and locations of the six new lights
was cletermined through consultation with Town staff.
Si na
Refer to Town of Vail Signage Ordinance
_ • Staff Res op nse:
The staff has requested that the applicant prepare a comprehensive sign program for the
Austria Haus. The comprehensive sign program will be reviewed by the DRB.
SERVICE
Trash handling is extremely sensitive in a pedestrian environment. Trash collection is primarily
made in off-peak hours. It is the building owners responsibiliry to assure that existing trash
storage problems are corrected and future ones avoided.
Trash, especially from food service establishments, must be carefully considered; including the
following:
- quantities generated
- pick-up frequency/access - - - container sizes
- enclosure location/design
- visual odor impacts
Garbage collection boxes or dumpsters must be readily accessible for collection at all times yet
fully screened from public view - pedestrians, as well as upper level windows in the vicinity.
Materials
Exterior materials for garbage enclosures should be consistent with that of adjacent buildings.
34
' Construction
Durability of the structure and operability of doors in all weather are prime concerns. Metal
frames and posts behind the preferred exterior materials should be considered to withstand the
inevitable abuse these structures suffer.
0 Staff Response:
The applicant has proposed to incorporate a trash dumpster into the design of the
underground parking structure. The trash dumpster will be completely enclosed and ,
accessible from inside the parking structure. Without a restaurant, the building is not
expected to generate an unusual amount of trash. .The driveway is designed to
accommodate trash trucks. Staff believes the applicanYs proposal complies the above-
described criteria.
E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards 4ha4 affect the
property on vvhich the special developmen4 district is proposed.
There are no natural and/or geologic hazards, including the Gore Creek floodplain, that
effect the Austria Haus property.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features,
vegetation and overall aestheYic quality of Yhe communiYy.
The applicant has revised the site plan in response to comments received from the
Planning and Environmental Commission and staff during previous worksession
meetings. Most importantly, the applicant has shifted the building on the site to further
buffer the surrounding properties. The applicant has designed the building to respect the
50' Gore Creek Stream setback along the south side of the property and is also
maintaining the required 20' setback along the west property line.
G. A circula4ion system designed fior bo4h vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and
off-site traffic circulation. ,
The Austria Haus redevelopment will have major positive impacts on both off-site and on-
site vehicle and pedestrian traffic systems surrounding the property. Staff believes that
pedestrian circulation will be substantially improved as result of the redevelopment.
Improvements include a new 14-foot wide bus lane and a dedicated, 12-foot wide
pedestrian lane along East Meadow Drive, as well as an improved pedestrian streetscape
along the north side of the building adjacent to the retail shops. The pedestrian
streetscape will be heated, thus providing ice-free and snow-free sidewalks. All new
pedestrian improvements propose the use of concrete unit pavers and will connect into
the existing improvements to the east (Slifer Square), to ihe west (Village Center) and to
the Vail Transportation Center to the north.
Vehicular circulation will also be effected by the redevelopment. The current parking
situation will be improved by removing the surface parking lot and replacing it with an
underground parking structure and a front entry drop-off area. Access to the parking
structure shall be via a heated ramp located at the west end of the project.
35
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and
preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
The proposed landscape plan will have important beneficial impacts on the quality of the
public spaces in the vicinity of the Austria Haus, due to the improvements to East
Meadow Drive, Slifer Square and the Gore Creek streambank.
The streetscape improvements recommended in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master
Plan will be.implemented. The improvements will enhance the pedestrian experience _
along East Meadow Drive through the construction of a wider and more attractive heated .
, walkway adjacent to the retail shops. The implementation of the streetscape
improvements will separate pedestrians from bus traffic by delineating the pedestrian
areas and bus lanes through the use of different paving surfaces.
The applicant has designed improvements to the western portion of Slifer Square. The
improvements have been developed with the help of Town staff. The applicant's design
is sensitive to the numerous mature trees existing in Slifer Square. Only those trees
which impact pedestrian circulation, effect sun exposure to the seating areas, and would
otherwise be damaged due to construction, are being removed. The removal of the trees
will be mitigated by the planting of additional trees elsewhere in Slifer Square.
Improvements are proposed for the Gore Creek streambank adjacent to the Austria Haus.
The improvements are intended to improve the visual appearance of the streambank and
, stabilize the soil by reducing the grade of the slope and revegetating the bare soils. The
applicant wilf also be implementing an erosion and sedimentation control plan to prevent
run-off from the construction site from entering Gore Creek.
1. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and
efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development
district.
Phasing of development is not proposed. The applicant is required to submit a
construction phasing and staging plan to the Town prior to receiving a building permit.
The plan will be used to ensure an efficient and workable relationship with surrounding
uses during the development of.the Austria Haus.
At this_ time, the applicant is anticipating a minor subdivision to amend the location of the
north property line. The applicant is proposing to trade land with the Town in order to
gain an additional one - two feet along the northerly property line. In exchange for this
land, the applicant is proposing to trade a triangular piece of properry adjacent to Slifer
Square to the Town. Any proposal to trade land with the Town must be reviewed and
approved by the Council.
36
V. CRBTEFiIA AND FBfilDINGS FOFt A COh1DITIONAL USE PERMiT
Upon review of Section 18.60, the Community Development Department recommends approvai
of the conditional use permit based upon the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental
. Commission (PEC) shall consider the factors with respect to the proposed use: .
- 9. , Relationship and impact of the use on developmen4 objectives of the
Tovvn.
, Staff believes that this review criteria has been satisfied as previously
discussed in Section IV of this memorandum.
2. The effect ofi the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportaYion facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
. facilities, and o4her public facilities needs.
Staff believes that this review criteria has been satisfied as previously
discussed in Section IV of this memorandum.
3. Effect upon fraffic vvith par4icular refierence 4o congesfion, automotive
and pedes4rian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
access, maneuverability, and removat of snovv from the street and
parking areas.
Staff believes that this review criteria has been satisfied as previously
discussed in Section IV of this memorandum.
4. Effiect upon the character of the area in wrhich the proposed use is to
be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in
- rela4ion 4o surrounding uses.
Staff believes that this review criteria has been satisfied as previously
discussed in Section IV of this memorandum.
5. Prior 40 the approval of a conditional use permit for a time-share
esta4e, frac4ional fee, fractional fee club, or time-share license
proposal, the followring shall be considered:
a. Vfi the proposal for a fractional fiee club is a redevelopment of
an euis4ing fiacility, the fractional fee club shall maintain an
equivalency of accommodation units as presently existing.
Equivalency shall be main4ained either by an equal number of
units or by square foofage. @f the proposal is a new
development, it shall provide a4 least as much accommodation
unit GRFA as fractional fee club uni4 GFiFA.
The Austria Haus proposal is a redevelopment of an existing
facility. The Austria Haus shall be required to maintain an
equivalency of the presently existing accommodation units. The
37
applicant is proposing to meet the equivalency requirement by
replacing an equal amount of accommodation unit square footage.
According to as-builts prepared by the applicant, 10, 1 00'square
feet of accommodation unit square footage exists in the Austria
Haus. Calculations of the proposed accommodation unit square
footage indicates that the applicant needs to provide an additional
181 square feet of accommodation unit square footage. In order to
meet this requirement, staff would recommend that the applicant
convert the lock-off for Unit # 10 to an accommodation unit. This
, would increase the total number of accommodation units to 26 and
. increase the equivalency square footage. b. Lock-off units and lock-off unit square footage shall not be
included in the calculation when determining the equivalency
of existing accommodation units or equivalency of existing
square footage.
Even though lock-offs cannot be counted towards meeting the
equivalency requirement, the applicant has maintained 28 lock-off
units in the Austria Haus. The staff and applicant feel these units .
will be rented as short-term accommodations and thus enhance
the hotel bed base in Town. . c. The ability of the proposed project to create and maintain a
high level of occupancy.
The Austria Haus proposal is intended to provide additional hotel
and "hotel-type" accommodation units in the Town of Vail. The
applicant is proposing to incorporate 22 member-owned club units
(fractional fee club units with 28 lock-off units), with 25
accommodation (hotel) rooms. Although not included in the
equivalency requirement, the fractional fee club units have been
designed to accommodate lock-off units. Staff believes that lock-
, off units provide an additional community benefit of added
"pillows". If a fractional fee club unit owner purchases an interest
- in a multiple bedroom unit, and does not desire to utilize all the
bedrooms, they can then have the opportunity of returning the
unused bedrooms (lock-offs) to a rental program.
Staff feels that by providing lock-off units, and managing the
availability of the lock-off units in a rental program when not in ~
- use, a fractional fee club project can significantly increase the
availability of accommodation units in the Town of Vail.
Through our research on the fractional fee issue, staff has
identified some potential positive impacts of fractional fee units in
the Town of Vail:
• A) Activity during the "shoulder seasons" tends to increase
due to an increase in year-round occupancy;
B) The attraction of revenue-generating tourists;
38
C) The efficient utilization of resources. This is the "warm
beds" concept;
D) More pride of ownership with fractional fee club units
than with accommodation units;
E) Increased levels of occupancy; and
F) Increased resort exposure due to the extensive number
of interval owners.
d. Ernployee housing may be required as part of any nev?r or
redevelopment frac4ional fee club project requesting density ,
, over that allowed by zoning. The number of employee housing units will be consistent with employee impacts 4hat are
expected as a result of the project.
' The staff included the fractional fee club units into the calculation
of the employee generation resulting from the establishment of the
Special Development District. Based strictly on the number of club
units, the development will generate a need for 8.8 "new"
employees. When the multiplier of 0.30 is factored in, 3 of the 11
"new" employees which the developer must provide deed-restricted
housing for, are generated by the fractional fee club.
e. The applicant shall submit 40 4he Tovvn a lis4 of all owners of
- existing units writhin the project or building; in written
statements from 100% of the ovNners of existing units
indicating 4heir approval, vvithouY condition, of 4he proposed
frac4ional fee club. No wri2ten approval shall be valid if it is
signed by the odvner more 4han 60 days prior to the dafe of
filing the application for a conditional use.
The applicant, Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., is the sole owner of the
property. No other written approval is required.
VI. STAFF RECOiiflNiENDATION
The staff is recommending approval of the request for the establishment of Special
Development District #35, Austria Haus, and the conditional use permit to allow for a fractional
fee club. The staff believes that all the review criteria have been met, as identified in this
memorandum. We would recommend that the approval carry with the it the following conditions:
1. That the applicant meet with the Town staff, prior to appearing before Town Council for
the first reading of an ordinance establishing Special Development District #35, to
formulate a construction phasing plan and to determine financial responsibilities for the
off-site improvements to Slifer Square, East Meadow Drive and the revegetation of the
Town-owned stream tract, south of the Austria Haus. Staff will then make a
recommendation to Council regarding the construction phasing and financial
responsibilities of the off-site improvements.
f:leveryone\pec\memoslsonnensd224 39
2. That the applicant prepare a deed restriction or covenant, subject to the Town Attorney's
review and approval, thereby restricting the current and future owner(s) ability to locate a
restaurant, or similar food service operation on the Austria Haus property. Said deed
restriction or covenant shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's
Office prior to the applicant submitting for a building permit.
3. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of_Community
Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application for the
Austria Haus:
. a. A Tree Preservation Plan; b. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan;
c. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;
d. A Stormwater Management Plan;
; e. A Site Dewatering Plan; and
f. A Traffic Control Plan.
4. That the applicant provide deed-restricted housing, which complies with the Town of Vail
Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 18.57), for a minimum of 11 employees, and
that said deed-restricted housing be made available for occupancy, and the deed
restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Austria Haus.
5. That the applicant pay into the Town of Vail Parking Fund for the required number of pay-
• in-lieu parking spaces, as determined at the time of building permit, prior to requesting a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Austria Haus. The applicant shall be required
to purchase the pay-in-lieu spaces at the rate in effect at the time of building permit
application.
6. That tfie applicant either remove that portion of building floor area (enclosed areas)
currently proposed on Town of Vail property (northwest portion of building/porte-cochere),
or appear before the Town Council with a request to subdivide and trade land with the
Town. Should the Council agree to a trade of land, all costs incurred to accomplish the
land trade shall be paid by the applicant. At this time, the applicant is anticipating a
minor subdivision to amend the location of the north property line. The applicant is
proposing.to trade land with the Town in order to gain an additional one - two feet of
property along the northerly property line. In exchange for this land, the applicant is
proposing to trade a triangular piece of property, adjacent to Slifer Square, to the Town.
7. That the applicant revise the building floor plans to provide at least 10,100 square feet of
accommodation unit square footage, to conform with the equivalency requirement for fractional fee club units, prior to appearing before the Vail Town Council for the first
reading of the ordinance establishing Special Development District #35. According to
as-builts prepared by the applicant, 10,100 square feet of accommodation unit square
footage exists in the Austria Haus. Calculations of the proposed accommodation unit
square footage indicates that the applicant needs to provide an additional 181 square feet
of accommodation unit square footage. In order to meet this requirement, staff would recommend that the applicant convert the lock-off for Unit # 10 to an accommodation
unit. This would increase the total number of accommodation units to 26 and increase
the equivalency square footage. '
f:\everyone\pec\memos\sonnensd.224 40
8. That the following design considerations be carefully reviewed by the Design Review
Board (as previously discussed in Section IV of this memorandum):
A) That the mullions on the windows and doors, as depicted on the building elevations,
be a required element of the Austria Haus project.
B) That the applicant further modify the south elevation of the structure, as this elevation
continues be too architecturally repetitive.
C) That the applicant revisit the originally contemplated design which incorporates the
loading and delivery facility in the underground parking structure. Staff believes that
trying to accommodate loading and delivery in the porte-cochere area will result in conflicts between pedestrians, vehicles accessing the parking structure, and delivery
trucks. Staff understands the original design option may not be the desire of the owners
of the Village Center Condominiums, yet we believe the impact can be mitigated with
appropriate screening.
D) That the improvements recommended for East Meadow Drive, as depicted in the
approved Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, be implemented as a part of the Austria
Haus project. This includes a reduction in street width from 30 feet to 26 feet (14 foot
bus lane and 12 foot attached, paver pedestrian walk).
E) That the roof ridge of the structure be carried to the east and west ends of the roof,
thereby creating gable ends, rather than a clipped hip. Staff does recognizes that the
- gable roof form may increase the perceived height of the building, especially on the east
and west ends, however, we believe that this wilf bring the structure more into
compliance with the Design Considerations.
F) That ihe applicant increase the roof overhangs on the building. Currently, the
overhangs vary from two feet to three feet. Staff would recommend that all the roof
overhangs be a minimum of three feet.
G) That a minimum of 25 lineal feet of additional glass area (55%) be added to the
ground floor (north and easi elevations) of the structure. This would make the Austria
Haus generally consistent with the transparency of other buildings in the Village.
. H) That the applicant review and modify the balcony configuration on the building, in order
to eliminate the repetitiye nature of the existing design, particularly on the south elevation.
The majority of the balconies on the Austria Haus are located on the south side of the
building, although several french balconies have been incorporated into the design of the
north side of the building on the upper floors.
I) That the applicant prepare a comprehensive sign program for the Austria Haus. The
comprehensive sign program will be reviewed by the DRB.
f:\everyonelpec\memos\sonnensd.224 41 I
~
~
~
• :\TT,\C11:1fiNT 1
ORDINANCE NO. 22 SCIZIES of 1996
AN ORDINANCE ANIGNllINC SECTION 18.04, DErINITIONS, ADDING
"rRACTIONAL I'EE CLU13" AND "°rRACTIONAL rGE CLUB UNIT", AMENDING
SGCTION 18.22.030, CONllIT10NAL USES, ALLOWINC I'12ACTIONAL FEE CLUB
AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE PUBLIC ACCONINIODATION ZONE DISTRICT,
ANICNDINC SECTION 13.60.060(A)(7), CONllIT10NAL USE PEWYIIT CRITERIA-
FINDINGS.
. WHEREAS, an application has been suUmitted to amend Sections 13.22.030 and
18.60.060 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code to alfow fractional fee club as a conditional use
in the Public Accommodation Zone District and to provide criteria and Findings applicable to
fractional fee club requests in Vail; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
WHEIZEAS, on November 25, 1996, in accordance with Section 18.66.140 the Town of
Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed
amcndmcnts and unanimously recommended approval of the amendments to the Town Council;
and
NVI-IGREAS, the Vaif Town Council befieves that quality fractional fee club unit are an
- appropriatc mcans of incrcasing occupancy rates, maintaining and enhancins short-term rental
availability and diversifying tltc resort lodging market within the Town of Vail; and
WHGREAS, the Vail Town Council believes lhat a fractionai fee club is a form of public
accommodation; and
WHEREAS, the Vail TovAi Council considcrs that it is rcasonablc, appropriate, and
bcne(icial to the Town of Vail anc] its citizcns, inhabitznts and visitors to adopt Ordinance No.
22, Scrics of 1996; aiid
WHEREAS, the Vail 'Town Council believes the proposed amendments are consistent
ivith its adopted goals, objectives and policies.
NOW, THEREFORE,-IIE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OP
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SI;CTiON 1
Chapter 18.04, Definitions is hereby amended to rcad as foliows:
18.04.136 , Fractional Fee Club, means a fractional fee project in which each
condominium unit, pursuant to recorded project documentation as approved by the Town of Vail,
has no fewer than 6 and no more than 12 owners per unit and whose use is established by a
rescrvation system. Each of the fractional fee club units are made available for short-term rental
in a managed program when not in use by the club members. Thc project is managed on-site
with a front desk operating 241tours a day, seven days a wcek providing reservation and
registration capabilities. The project shall inc(ude or be proximate to transportation, retail shops, .
eating and drinl:ing establishments, and recreation facilities.
18.04.136.1 Fractional Fee Club Unit - a condominium unit in a fractional fee club
described as such in the project documentation and not an accommodation unit within the
fractional fee club.
1 aai- w.:x sio or isss
18.04.430 Fractional Fee [Deleted]
zSi;CTTON 2
Section 18.22.030 - Public Accomniodation-Conditional Uses - of the Town of Vail
Municipaf Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.22.030 Conditional uscs
The followins conditional uses shall be permitted in the Public Accommodation Zone
District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the
' . provisions of Chapter 18.60:
A. Professional and business offices;
B. I-Iospitals, medical and dental clinics, and medical centers;
C. Private clubs and civic, cultural and fratemal organizations;
D. Ski lifts and tows;
E. Theaters, meeting rooms, and convention facilities;
P. , PuUlic or conimercial parking facilities or structures;
G. Public transportation terminals;
H. Public utility and public service uses;
1. Public buildings, grounds and facilities;
J. Public or private schools;
K. Public parks and recrcational facilities;
L. Churches;
M. Lating, drinl:ing, recrcational, or retail establislunents not occupying more than
10% of the totnl Gross Residential Ploor Area of a main structure or struetures
locatcd on the sitc in a uon-conforming multi-family dwc(ling;
N. Major arcaeie, so lonb as it docs not have any exterior frontage on any public way,
strcet, walkway, or mall arca;
0. Bcd and Brcakfast as fttrthcr rcgulatcd by Scclion 18.53.310;
P. Type III EHU as dcfincd in Scction 18.57.060;
Q. Type IV L'f-lU as defined in Section 18.57.70;
R. Practional fee club as further regulated by Section 18.60.060(A)(7)(a-e).
Si:CTION 3
Section 18.60A60(A)(7), Conditional Uses Permit criteria-findings, of the ToNm of Vail
Municipal Code is hcreby amended and shal( read as follows:
7. Prior to thc approval of a conditional use perniit for a time-share estate, fractional
fee, fractional fee club, or time-share license proposal, die following shall be
considered:
a. If the proposal for a fractional fee club is a redevelopment of an existing
facility, the fractional fee club shall maintain an equivalency of
acconimodation units as are presently existing. Equivalency shall be
maintained eitlicr by an equal number of units or by squarc footage. If the
proposal is a new development, it shall provide at ]east as much
accommodation unit GRFA as fractional fee club unit GRFA.
b. Lock-off units and lock-off unit square footaae shall not be included in the
calculation when determining the equivalency of existing accommodation
units or equivalency of existing square footage.
c. The ability of the proposed project to create and maintain a high level of
occupancy.
2
Ordi~ No. 2; Saia of 1996
d• Employec housing units may bc required as pnrt of any new or
redevelopment fractional fee club project requesting density over that `
allowed by zoning. Thc number of employee Iiousing units required will
be consistcnt with employce impacts that are cxpected as a result of the
projcct.
e. The applicant shall submit to the town n list of all owners of existing units
within the project or building; and written statements from one-hundred
pcrcent of the owners of existing units indicating their approval, wilhout
condition, of the proposed fractional fcc club. No written approval shall
be valid if it was signed, by the owner more than sixty days prior to the
. date of filing the application for a conditional use.
SF,CTInN 4
If any pan, section, subsection, sentcnce, clause or phrasc of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and
each parc, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thercof, regardless of the fact dhat any
one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declazed invalid.
ST;CTinN S The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and dcclares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the healdl, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Si:CTiON C
The rcpeal or the repeal and reeilacUUCnt of any provision of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail as providcd in this ordinance shalf not affcct any ribht which has accrucd, any duty
imposcd, any violation that occurrcd prior to the cffcctivc datc hcrcof, any prosecution
commcnccd, nor any othcr action or procccdings as commcnccd under or by viriuc of the
provision repealcd and recnacted. The repeal of:uiy provision hcrcby stiall not revive any '
provision or any ordinancc prcviously rcpcalcd or supcrscded unless cxpressly statcd herein.
ST:CTinN 7
All bylaxvs, ordcrs, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts tlicreof, inconsistent herewith are
repcalcd to the extent only of sucli inconsistency. T'his repcaler shall not be construed to revise
nny bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part tliereof, therctoforc repealed.
FULL ON FIRST READING this 7th day of January, 1997, and a public hearinb shall be held on
this Ordinance on the 21st day of January, 1997, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal
IIuilding, Vail, Colorado.
Robcrt W. Arcnour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
3
ATTACHMENT 2
. ~ . . ~ ~ ~
Memo Pierce, Segerberg & Associ.ttes
Archicects. P.C.,A.I.A.
To: Joe Treleven Miin orri«
Director, Village Center Association 1000 S. Froncage Road W.
v,il.co e1es7 .
. 120 Willow Bridge Road, #SJ (ox: 970 476 4609
Vail, CO 81657 phone: 970 476 4-133
]From: Gordon Pieree Denver O(fice
Ref: Landscaping and Planting of Village Center Property 1617 wa=ee s«eet
suite e z
Date: February 10, 1997 Denver, CO 80202
(ax: 303 623 2262
phone: 303 623 3355
As requested by the Town of Vail Planning Department, I am asking if you would sign
below on behalf of the Village Center Condominium Association in that the Austria Haus
may landscape on the village center property.
. A detailed plan of the area between our properties will be forthcoming for your review.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
PIERCE, SEGERBERG & ASSOCIATES, P.C., A.I.A.
ordon Pierce, A.I.A. _
- Chairman
GRP/jod
Approved by:
f:\prj\austria_house\docs\treleven feb 10, 1997.doc
ATTACHI`IENT 3
ENfP1_01TtEh7 GENEP-AT10N R/1?TS
EXIiIBT'i' A
SUGGESI~ED I:'Nfl'LO]'ME-N"f CATECORIL'S AND RANGES FOR VAIL
ExrREssED As Enirr.oYF-r•_s PE- ri 1000 SQvnRr- FE rT RRC RESEARCx
OVERALL SUGGESTED
' AVERAGES R.ANGE
I3ar/Restaurant 5.7/1000 s.f. 5-811000 s.f.
Retail and Service Commercial 5.9/1000 5-8/1000 '
Retail: Grocery/Liquor/Convenience 1.8/1000 1.5-3/1000
Office: Real Estate 7.6/1000 6-9/I000
' Office: Financial ~ 3.1/1000 2.5-4/1000
Office: Professional/Other . 6.6/1000 5-$/1040
Conference Center NA 1/1000
Health Club NA . 1-1.511440
L.adging* 1.3/room .25-1.25/room
T..ocal Government 6.5/1000 5-8/1000
Construction (Offices, Interior Storage, etc.) 10.6/1400 9-13/1040
. Multi-Family N/A 0.4/unit
Single Family N/A 0.2/unit
OLher: To be determined through t}ie SDD '
process, upon submission of adequate documentation and a review of the application materials.
* I.odgingJaccommodations has particularly large variation of employees per room; depending
upon factors such as size of facility and level of service/support facilities and amenities provided.
The standards present a wide range of employment, but it is anticipated that a definitive report
will be submitted by each lodging properry requesting an expansion, which would then be ; eyaluated on a case-by-case basis. ~ r ` . . •
Multiplier based on density •
. ' .30 if exceeding density
.15 if at or below density
P.OSAI.L RFaiT.{EN CA RF,S
, ATTACILkIENT 4
nustria Staffing Itostcr
Position hours of opcration 199p1 1998 cntLl. commcnls
Managcr floaling I 1
/lssislant floating I I
Front Dcsk 71111 to I lpm 3 5 24 hour dcsk
i3cllstaff floating I 3 parking ~C. sizc
I-lousckccping 8am to Spm G 10 size ancl I{ of rms
turndown 2 3
13ar 3pm to tni(Inight 1,5 1.5 . '
Rcslaurant Sam to noon
wait 5 • 3.5
kitchen 2• 0 conlincntal only
4pm to midnight wait 4 p
kitclicn 3.5 0 Rctail varics 5 unknawn f3u71'z II&II
Lnginccrinb 7am l0 1 I pni 1 2
Concicrgc 7am to 1 I am
31)ni to 71)m 0 1.5
- .36 31.5
Scrviccs providcd fram Main I-lotcl Complcx:
Spa
GoIC
/1c(ivitics
Markcting cC Salcs
Accounting
Rcscrvation
'1'clcphon .
Laundry
Unifonns
Room Sccvicc
Confcrcnce Scrviccs
Employee Cafetcria '
I-luman Rcsources j i
Floral & Dccoration
Llndscaping .
Employec Housinb . Purchasing
'
. .
. . , .
~ ~ ~ . TT' ~7 ~ -c~- ~ T- ~ I WR ~ ~M1lY~]/IO/GS
E.IST 4FlDOW ORNE ~ ~•a\ ~
~ ~ ~ •y _ ~ _ ~ ^..~1 ~ o ~ . 4 ~ M.9.~+..'..~
.ea
o
AU5iRU HOUSE l•• ~ /
, ~ .
W ' ~ l
NLUCE CEMER : . yl • /I
\ - ~ r +~~erras ~ •:i'n. ^ ~ g,
AIOUNTNN iL415
• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~`l _ ~ .
curM a-+
. `
: ' ~sv~"• .
c~ i- ni ii• tOi a
i~ LOf b
c - 1 r.YU• t ~ .
a I . a v / \
ic-xe:
ce - s u~~roY t ~ BLOCK S-0 ~
. ~ CRCE1tSiDE L01 c \ .
' CONDOMINIUMS
Ms;r~' ~'C?•:e'aw"
AUSTRIA HAUS v,u4 cocoRAno EXISTINC3 CONDTTIONS
30NNENALP PROPBRTIES, ING D I a I Q n w 0 a `1 9 CrEg
n
~ I ,lJ I
~ . . •
.
_
• / ' ~ J' / ~ , _ -
, .
, . . .
/
, .
, . .
, . ~
~
. ~
~ _ _
, ~
,
. . ~ . : _
.
. _ _ -
~
~ -
. ,
_ . . c :
~
-
- .
•
.
~ -
.
; . _ .
- -
- - .
' - - -
~.::~:.•::.~:.:•::~.:..:.::.:`..:~~r`:.:?.:`~..~.i:.:..i.:.:~.:'.:.~.
:
~~~i::~i:i:}:.~:.c::•:.~~:..~.:i::':': ~ ..:..:.....:..:.:'.::..~::i:~::::•..:-.::.~ . ~ . d:'.:.:i:::,:..
..~O : .c
R . . , . ~ .
.
> E ~
_ .
e _ . . -
, .
_ .
_ . . _ : :
. . . . . - -
e
160
: :
o
C
CREEK_.:_c:
~ .
. .
~ -
~ ~ . _ "
.
„ , . . . -
. . . ~
~ '
r~
BtGD
a • . I ~'s'^• 8170 ~ _
~LR-IIfOFbNOUl'IELT
0
~ o e _ _ , ~
~1J0~6~ o ~ I NLLAGE CENTER
pUILDWi'A' .
000
000
~ LMIT OL 11 ~ GNaU'7E ~
0~ /yi j~ j - - - - _ % //I I
/ A_J
SIIFER ('LAZA ~ / ' j " ~ ~J ~ \ '~//~~'X•' j~ ~
•/ii~ j/ ~ J ~ ~ ~ / \ ~ i~/ I _
/
~
.O , ll~j~~~'
NLLdGE CENTE¢
e"o-s
. E t'F'SDqU
D~yyF
. 0
AUSTRIA HALTS VA1I, COLORADO
SONPISIVAI,P PROPERTIES, IIVC. ~ SA10BV MELT AREAS
. ~ DQDwI_Oc*w.ORjtBAO~
r~
' j n..~.i«..
~ nrtn.K~ ~
I I
Q z ~ ' I
~
. i
- _ ? ,
,
. :
` ~
~ ,
,
;
, -
~ ~ ; .
o-- . ,
, . . ,
1 I
._._._..__._._._.t.-_~--
- ~ ' _._.i._._._.
~
.
r,°'."-Icc+_c•Ic - Nil~
~ .
_
7
..c I
. ~ . ~ T _ - ~ .
: . .
. . ' '
, ...i....... ' •
' .j..; . ~ - -
.
. . ~ • -
' ' ~
~ . ~ ~ ' ~
.
.
_ _ _ - - - Q1,
,
~ C}---------- . - - -
, - - - - - - - - - - - -I---- :
-
0
-~---I---~; - i_ -~--~T~--~-~1--~- + I~ ~i
I " _ _ ~ I ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ?...I --I----~' ( ~r
. _
_ i_
~ _ .
J ~ - ~
.I ~ I I I • I ~ I:
~ ~ ~ i ~ ' •
I i ~ I I
~ • ' ~ ~ , I ~ _ !~I
? ~ "'~:I
,
r GARAG-E LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~~~~M
j '
{ - - - . : ; A 2.0
~
- - - -----Q. , i I~
- -
- - - :
; .
s.,~..~.., . I
. n~t~....
'
i
~ `ma s
~ 7 , 3 O 5 6 , I . I.
. ~ . ;
i ~
,
U ~
• . ~.r...°- ,at ~ Q ~ I~
D m ~oi m~~~ni '
~
- ~ - - -
E _ - I - - - - -,ti.~.;.J ~ 'a I ~j
o- ~ ` ~ I la
- - - - - -
rPr_`v J*~L, r'~=`_v
.n,
~ ,I - - x
;
I v.n ^ ~sry~..R.~ .o.n rov. . ..e tl n ~
~ wrn
~
j ~ i ~wn ° ~i+yrqi
f lO~µ sytql~ )v~yr~
~y qR
` . . fPK y ~n i I~rtu•~.
[,SEGOND LEvEL FOOR PL.aN f ,
T I~I
2.2
7 ' I I
i _ ~~1
. : . _ -
- ~ ~
,
i
ArtM.vn
I ~w+
• I wti
I
• I i -~':y'?~~
~ 3
I
' i
G
Q
I
Q~uu.v
. L''J._'_.
OD - _ _ ~ - - - - --r~G4-tT - - ~ F-.
- Aas
U-
- - - ' - i J
AO-- 1w ait+u I ~ '
I~
I b~rCAICSS=
I ~ ~l q I ~ 7
I I,J
9) ~ ~ }
10-
. i . va+w"~•o'~.~:IS.i o :~n^ t~
! I li!
• .
~,~OIJRTH LEVEL FLOOR ALGN
5 ~ A2.4 ~y
. - -
• ' - c2°°'r.'~~ ~
. ,.r_
. :
-
- - . . ,
,
_ I n.. .
- Ar. lie~
j rG.nu
~ t mt'm ~
~ 3 ~ S 6 , I
I ~ y
9
I ~ ' I
a--------- - ~
a-~---~-------- ~ . ~ - :
-T- - -
~ i
o---~-------~- . -
~ , . _ i ,
, ~ =I
i ~ - - - - '
~ ~ ; - - _ Q'~a ~
0----------- ~_I_._---- ~ '
O
- - -
- - -n- ~ i I`'
r- -
. -
I
. .
~
I - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - -
~
- .
- - - - F
. l ~
i ~ - -
~ ' ( ,
: ~ ~ ~ . I
/ . ~
~ -
i.i I `
I._.. - - - ~
r
o-------------- - ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~
i ~
F ~ i I W
PL nN
A2.6
~
, ~
-
~1
/ Anirwr.
r.c.•~.
~
----a Q
~-r
~ _ .I~'• I I ~
' gT
4' l l t ~ I
i TH
~ ,i , - µ~i ~
1 t-' II I ~.I II11. H
~
' ~(]~~f? - - r I-~l!~~~~~~I~!~ ~ I'? `~I~ ~ - 1
1
' FJ15T FIFVATIOF! ~
WEST FIEVATION • ~
.w.:~,.~... ,
• ' . • ~ ~
. ~ Ln'~.-_ •;1.f~
. . . • ~-w=
~ • , . • , A 3.1 ~
~ - - ~ N.
. .
- -
. - - ,~i~
~
_ BALCONY
, )Nl
I
BALCONY ~
. ~ BALGONY
UNIT •g ~ I
- . B BD~4P'iJ j . I
I
EDRI`I. _UNIT •4 ~ I
(3 BDRf1.1 , I ~
- ~
LOC< O;:F L,y;T ° LOCK OFF - ~ I_ _ I C!)I a
(3 LJ I~ ~ I I I E~ ~ I~
L ~ IL~I s
~~J ~JNIT B FL002 PLAh V}i~> ~
eDfRrI. ,
IZSGS ~aic /
. eDRr-t. Boa-t.
i ~ _
I ~ \ BALCONY ~
BALGONT B I ~
NOTEL • ~ - SdLGONI f
ROOM •1 - - -
I~
SDR:'1.
- - !_OC<O==J (:CG<.^.FF: BDFZ'1. lP:lt 5 ~a
BDI.~f. F7YP. 3 3DI'.J I
-OGK 0=F
I~
j p Iw
uNir
~ ...o °4 FLOOR PLAN ~1 . . INIT °4 FLOOR PLAV
c
; l~l: . Zj I~~
• , t:'. ~
j ~WIT S FLOOR PLAN
w
I
.
I~
• . _ ~pao.+ao~~
. . . _ _ . _ . -
' _ _ '
• - t.i~_~
~ - - , ........Q_ '
~ _
.
I . ~
, ~CO •'2 k
~ -
' I
f!)~
! h
Z ~.r
i ~-o~ _ c~i-s •3_•a , _ ~a ~ G\ i~~ ~
i
H
i QI C
j,
~ I
r
-J
:I
uo'r=L ~ - ~
R Opr'I
j ~
. ~ (
t ~
~ -
. ~i
: ~vNOT-__L UNIT •I FLOOR _pL41~
~ 0-~ •\'-e • c _ ~ . . ~ - o~,.,., -
~ . _ . .
. - - - - - - - ,`i
- - - - - - - ~ A1~... ~
_ ~ • .
- - - - = ~
~
MEPAOFiAIVDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: February 24, 1997
SUBJECT: A request for a final review of the establishment of Special Development District , #35, Austria Haus, and a request for a conditional use permit to allow for a -
Fractional Fee Club, located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block
5-D, Vail Village First Filing.
' Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce
Planner: George Ruther
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE FtEQUESYS
A. Yhe Esfablishmen4 of a Special Development Dis4ric4
The applicant, Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce, is requesting a
final review meeting with the Planning and Environmental Commission for the
establishment of Special Development District #35, located at 242 East Meadow Drive/on
part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing. The applicant is proposing to
establish a new Special Developmen4 District overlay 4o the underlying zone district
of Public ,4ccommodation, 4o facilitate the redevelopment of the existing Austria
Haus.
The applicant has proposed significant improvements to the existing Austria Haus
property. The Austria Haus is intended to become a member-owned resort club/lodge,
comprising a mix of hotel accommodation units and two and three-bedroom club units
with associated club amenities/facilities. The ,4ustria liaus proposal is intended to
provide additional ho4el and "hotel-type" accoinmodation units in the Town ofi Vail.
The applican4 is proposing to incorporate 22 member-owned club units (firactional
fee club units with 28 lock-off units), with 25 hotel rooms and one on-site manager's
residence (eenployee housing unit). The applicant is proposing 4,440 square feet of
nevu commercial/retail space on the main level of the Austria Flaus. The Austria
Haus proposal includes a front desk recep4ion/registration area operating 24 hours
a day and seven days a week, a lounge, an exercise room, member ski storage and
other accessory fiacilities commonly associated vvi4h ho4els and lodges.
The applicant has identified what they believe to be public benefits which will be realized
as a result of the Austria Haus redevelopment. The public benefits identified by the
applicant include:
1
1. An increase in the annual occupancy of the Austria Haus by approximately four
times. 2. The addition of approximately 4,000 square feet of retail space (sales tax generating).
3. The implementation of the recommended Streetscape Master Plan improvements
to East Meadow Drive.
4. The completion of the commercial loop in the Village via the construction of a
well-lit, heated pedestrian walkway.
5. The removal of 25 surface parking spaces and the construction of an underground
parking structure.
. 6. Landscape improvements to Slifer Square, East Meadow Drive and the Gore
Creek streambank.
B. Conditional Use Permit
The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit to allow for the
construction of a Fractional Fee Club as part of the Austria Haus redevelopment. As
men4ioned previously, the applicant is proposing to incorporate 22 fractional fee
club units into the Austria Haus. Each of the club units will be sold in one-ninth
shares.
On January 21, 1997, the Vail Town Council adopted Ordinance #22, Series of 1996, an `
ordinance amending Section 18.04, Definitions, adding "Fractional Fee Club" and
• "Fractional Fee Club UniY", amending Section 18.22.030, Conditional Uses, allowing
fractional fee club as a conditional use in the Public Accommodation Zone District, .
amending Section 18.60.060(A)(7), Conditional Use Permit Criteria-Findings. The review
of the Austria Haus proposal will be according the procedures prescribed in Chapter
18.60 of the Municipal Code. A copy of Ordinance #22, Series of 1996, has been
attached for reference.
II. BACKGROUND
The Austria Haus was originally constructed in the mid-1960's as an inn to accommodate
destination skiers. In 1979, the Austria Haus was purchased by the Faessler family who planned
to redevelop the property into the SonnenalR Hotel.
In 1984, Ordinance #8 was approved by the Vail Town Council establishing Special Development
District #12. Special Development District #12 adopted an approved development plan for the
redevelopment of the Austria Haus. When Ordinance # 8 was adopted, the Town Council placed .
an eighteen-month time limit on the approval of the SDD. The approval of SDD # 12 lapsed
eleven years ago, on October 2, 1985. The approved development plan was never implemented,
and instead, the Ausiria Haus underwent a remodel. Since the completion of the remodel, the
Austria Haus has served as an annex to the Sonnenalp Bavaria Haus located at 20 Vail Road.
The Austria Haus has 37 hotel rooms (accommodation units) totaling 10,100 sq. ft. with
approximately "75 pillows" and is operated eight months each year by Sonnenalp Properties, Inc.
There is a small restaurant and bar in the Austria Haus that serves the guests and a small retail
outlet on the east end of the building. The hotel rooms are marginal in size (300 sq. ft. average)
and lack certain hotel amenities, by today's standards.
2
~ ' -
+ ; ? _ . ~ . -
; -
_ V_ _
.._^_:11 -
'
-f '
' • ~ ~ ' _ ~I ~
~ ~ _ Q,.~ - - ~ ~i°
~J • ~ _ ~1_~ = - ~ ~i Y
_ F= - - -Y, Tl ~
- , . - i ~ . . . i~ ~ . ;
- ~ ;
u
i
- - - {i
; - -
~ , ~ ~ ; - ~ _ _ -
: - - - - I~ ' - - _ _ ~
_
~
. . ~ _
. ~ ` c•
:
. . •J
• . . . . _ 1
I'1C
- . _ t
' _ ' . lv...on .
_ ,.~!i
ME Ii'I ORAN?) UIl1[
To: Vail Town Council
From: Community Development Department
Date: April 11, 1997
Re: Austria Haus Redevelopment
The second reading of Ordinance #4, Series of 1997, an ordinance establishing Special
Development District #35, Austria Haus, is scheduled on the Town Council agenda for Tuesday,
April 15, 1997.
The Planning and Environmental Commission will be holding a hearing on the amended Austria
Haus redevelopment proposal at 2:00 p.m., Monday, April 14, in the Town Council Chambers.
This meeting is open to the public and community members representing all points of view are
encouraged to attend.
You will not find a copy of the staff inemorandum to the Planning and Environmental
Commission or a revised draft ordinance in your packet. Staff had not yet completed the
necessary review of the amended SDD proposal, updating of the draft ordinance and wriring the
memoranda when the Council packets were distributed.
To insure that the Council members receive the necessary information in a timely manner, a
second packet will be hand delivered by no later than 10:00 a.m., Monday, April 14.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. We are working actively to keep this item on
the April 15 Council agenda to insure that the Town Council's review of the proposed Austria
Haus redevelopment occurs at a time when all members are present.
If you have any questions regarding the proposed Austria Haus amemded redevelopment
proposal, please do not hesitate to contact George Ruther in the Community Development
Department staff.
Agcnda last rcvised 4/ I S/97 10 am
PLANNiftlG APID ENVIROIVNAEFfTAL CONiMISSION
Monday, April 14, 1997
FINAL AGENDA
Project Orientation /LUNCH - Community Development Department 11:00 am
AIPP - 5 minute update - Diane Golden
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT DRB MEMBERS PRESENT
Greg Moffet- Ted Hingst
Greg Amsden Clark Brittain
Galen Aasland
Gene Uselton
Diane Golden
John Schofield
Ann Bishop
Site Visits : 12:00 pm
1. Hilliard - 2049 Sunburst Drive
2. Golden Peak Ski Base - 458 Vail Vafley Drive
3. A& D Building - 286 Bridge Street
4. Red Lion Building - 304 Bridge Street
5. Pepi's - 231 E. Gore Creek Drive
6. Austria Haus - 242 East Meadow Drive
7. Gondola Building
Driver: George
~ • ;a~.°~~:ur.
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearina -Tovvn Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. Swearing in of new PEC member Ann Bishop and reappointed PEC members Greg
Moffet and John Schofield - Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk.
2. Election of PEC Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for a one-year term (4/97-4/98).
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 7-0
PEC Chairperson - Greg Moffet Vice-Chairperson - Greg Amsden
1 TOWNOF{'AIL ~
ngcnda last rcviscd 4/ I S/97 10 am
3. A joint worksession with the Design Review'Board to make a recommendation to
Council on the "Wish List" items for the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Staff: Susan Connelly
WORKSESSION - NO VOTE
4. A request for a joint final review with the Design Review Board of an amended proposal
for the establishment of Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, located at 242
East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 6-1 (Aasland opposed)
APPROVED WITH 5 CONDITIONS:
1. That the Design Review Board carefully review the combination of the proposed
exterior building materials and how they are applied to ensure that a high-level of
architectural quality is maintained.
° 2. That an approval of the amended proposal to establish SDD #35 be conditioned
upon the approval of a minor subdivision request by the PEC within s'tXAp niriety days
from the effective date of Ordinance #4, Series of 1997 and that all costs incurred to
subdivide the property be the responsibility of the Austria Haus and not the Town of
Vail.
3. That the applicant provide deed-restricted housing, which complies with the Town of
Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 18.57), for a minimum of 12
employees, and that said deed-restricted housing be made available for occupancy,
and the deed restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to
requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Austria Haus.
4; That the; applicant rev , iew; the rel0ef>on the'north ;elevation
,
5:: Th.at staff`receive a'roof pro~ect?on plan; pr~orto;construction;; and that ~t`lae reviewed.
by the bR:6::
5. A request for a major exterior alteration in CC1, to allow for a deck enclosure at the A& D
Building, located at 286 Bridge Street/Lots A, B, & C, Block 5A, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: 286 Bridge Street, Inc., represented by Craig Snowdon
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Gene Uselton VOTE: 7-0
APPROVED WITH 1 AMENDED CONDITION:
1. Prior to obtaining a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or a Final Certificate of
Occupancy, the applicant shall, subJec1 to th. 240di090n ttie staff;memorand;um;
2
Agcnda last rcviscd 4/I 5/97 10 am
- ensure that any noise emitted from the air conditioning compressor is in compliance
with Section 8.24.060 of the Municipal Code. Staff will measure the noise emitted, in
accordance with the code. If the noise exceeds the limitations found in this section,
the applicant shall modify and/or buffer the facility so that compliance is achieved.
6. A request for a minor subdivision of the Lodge Tower parcel, located at 200 Vail Road/Lots
A& C, Block 5-C, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Lodge Properties, Inc., represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Gene Uselton SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 7-0
APPROVED SUBJECT TO 1 FINDING:
1. That the proposed minor subdivision plat complies with the criteria and requirements
of Chapter 17 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
7. A request for a minor exterior alteration in CC1 and a request for a site coverage variance
from Section 18.24.150, to a commercial storefront and for an expansion to the outdoor
dining deck, in the Red Lion Building, located at 304 Bridge Street/Lots E, F, G, & H, Block
5-A, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Landmark Commercial Development, represented by Morter Architects
Planner: Tammie Williamson
MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 7-0
YABLED UIVTIL AF'RIL 28, 1997
8. A request for a variance frorn Section 18.13.060 (Setbacks) to allow for a snowmelt boiler
and a snow avalanche mitigation wall in the south side setback, located at 2049 Sunburst
Drive/Lot 1, Vail Valley 4th Filing.
Applicant: Landon and Mary Hilliard, represented by Larry Eskwith
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 6-1 (Schofield
opposed)
APPFiOVED SUB.?ECT TO 3 FINDINGS:
1. That the granting of the requested side setback variance is not a grant of special
privilege since snowmelt boilers have 6een permitted in setbacks in other areas of
Town.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious to the public improvements as the snowmelt boiler will
be screensd from public view and that the snow avalanche mitigation wall will protect
the public from potentially impacting the boiler should they stray from the bike path.
3. That there are extraordinary circumstances applicable to the Hilliard's site which do
not apply generally to other properties in the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone
Qistrict or in the vicinity.
3
Agenda lasl reviscd 4/I 5/97 10 am
9. A request for an appeal of an administrative decision regarding Section 18.64.040 (Non-
Conforming Uses), stating that private and public unstructured off-street parking is a
different land use than private and public structured off-street vehicle parking, and
therefore, an existing legal non-conforming use may not be continued.
Appellant: Pepi Gramshammer, represented by Pierce, Segerberg & Associates.
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION:John Schofield SECOND: Gene Uselton VOTE: 6-1 (Bishop
opposed)
UPHOLD THE STAFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIOPI STATING THAT THE REMOVAL
OF THE EXISTING LEGAL, NON-CONFORiNING UNSTRUCTURED (SURFACE PARKING,
AND-'THE SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OF AN UNDERGROUND PARKING
STRUCTURE, CONSTITUTES A CHANGE IN USE, AND THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY
MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH TF6E DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
PRESCRIBED IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
1. That private and public unstructured (surface) off-street vehicle parking is a different
land use than private and public structured off-street vehicle parking.
10. A request for an amendment to the development plan to allow for outdooi ski storage,
. located at 458 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th
Filing, commonly referred to as the Golden Peak Ski Base.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
Planner: Lauren Waterton
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 3-3 (Moffet
recused)
MOTION FAILED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. That the applicant submit an application to the Design Review Board to amend the
sign program to modify the location of the directional sign. The sign shown on Sheet
1.2 of the Sign Program, approved by the Design Review Board on July 17, 1996,
must be removed from the Sign Program in order to locate a directional sign on the
wall of the ski storage building.
2; Th'at.the ;location be ctianged: to th~'sauttieasC'end jnstead pf the northw~st end _of
the existing bus;faaljty:
MOTION: Gene Uselton SECOND:Diane Golden VOTE: 3-3 (Moffet
recused)
NiOTION FAILED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That the applicant submit an application to the Design Review Board to amend the
sign program to modify the location of the directional sign. The sign shown on Sheet
1.2 of the Sign Program, approved by the Design Review Board on July 17, 1996,
must be removed from the Sign Program in order to locate a directional sign on the
wall of the ski storage building.
REQUEST DEIVIED DUE TO LACK OF AN APPROVED MOTIOW
4
ngcnda last reviscd 4/I 5/97 10 am
11. A request for an appeal of the staff denial of the outdoor ski storage, located adjacent to the
Gondola Building/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Appellant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
Planner: Lauren Waterton
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Gene Uselton VOTE: 5-0-2 (Moffet
recused, Bishop abstained)
UPHOL.D THE STAFF'S DENIAL OF THE OUTDOOR SKI STORAGE AND
RECOiViMEPJDS TFiAT 1'HE PLANNING AND ENVIRONi1flEPdTAL CONii1NISSION MAKE
TBiE FOLLOVVING FINDIiVGS:
1. That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 18 (Zoning)
have not been met.
2. That the ski storage use has been substantially altered and enlarged and is no longer
a legal nonconforming use.
3. That the installation of these structures is in violation of the zoning code.
12. A request for a worksession to discuss a conditional use permit to allow Type III EHUs for
seasonal housing, located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/legally described as:
beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 west of the Sixth
Principal Meridian thence S 89°31'49" E 2333.84 feet, along the North line of said Section 9, to
a point on the northerly right-of-way fence line of Interstate Highway No. 70 thence along the
northerly right-of-way fence line of Interstate Highway No. 70 as follows:
S 67°41'33" W 415.82 feet; thence S78°13'02" W 1534.29 feet, to a point of curvature; thence
456.43 feet on a curve to the right with a radius of 5580.00 feet, the chord of which bears
S80°33'38" W 456.30 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Section 9: thence departing
the northerly right-of-way fence line of Interstate Highway No. 70 and following the Westerly
line of said Section 9, North 00°8'21 "E 565.11 feet to the point of beginning.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Andy Knudtsen and Susie Hervert
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
1NOFiKSESSlON - NO VOTE
13. A request for aworksession to discuss a major exterior alteration in CC1 and a minor
subdivision, to allow for the construction of a parking garage, 9 accommodation units, 1
condominium and new retail office space at the Gasthof Gramshammer, located at 231 E.
Gore Creek Dr./Part of Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Pepi Gramshammer, represented by Pierce, Segerberg, & Associates
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UP9TIL APIRIL 28,1997
5
Agenda last rcviscd 4/ I 5/97 10 am
14. Information Update - Town Council decision on Kelton appeal - Dirk Mason
15. Appointment of PEC Representative (Galen Aasland) on Open Space Committee to replace
Henry Pratt.
MOTION: Gene Useiton SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 7-0
16. Appointment of PEC Representative at DRB for the October - December 1997 quarter.
17. Approvai of March 10, 1997.
The appiications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD
for information.
Community Development Department
6
Agenda last rcviscd 4/10/97 11 nm
PLANNING AND ENVIRONf1flENTAL COnAi1flISSiON
Monday, April 14, 1997
AGENDA
Projecf Orien4ation / LUNCCi - Community Development Department 11:00 am
AIPP - 5 minute update - Diane Golden
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits : 12:00 pm
1. Hilliard - 2049 Sunburst Drive
2. Golden Peak Ski Base - 458 Vail Valley Drive
3. A& D Building - 286 Bridge Street
4. Red Lion Building - 304 Bridge Street
5. Pepi's - 231 E. Gore Creek Drive
6. Austria Haus - 242 East Meadow Drive
° 7. Gondola Building
Driver: George
~ ?~^r:;
B~• ~~j`~~e`/•
J~
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearince -Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. Swearing in of new PEC member Ann Bishop and reappointed PEC members Greg
Moffet and John Schofield - Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk.
2. Election of PEC Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for a one-year term (4/97-4/98).
3. A joint meeting with the Design Review Board to make a recommendation to Council on
the "Wish List" items for the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Staff: Susan Connelly
4. A request for a joint final review with the Design Review Board of an amended proposal
for the establishment of Special Development District #35, Austria Haus, located at 242
East Meadow Drive/on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gordon Pierce
Planner: George Ruther
~ TOWN *VAIL
Agcnda last rcviscd 4/10/97 11 am
' 5. A request for a major exterior alteration in CC1, to allow for a deck enclosure at the A& D
Building, located at 286 Bridge Street/Lots A, B, & C, Block 5A, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: 286 Bridge Street, Inc., represented by Craig Snowdon
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
6. A request for a minor subdivision of the Lodge Tower parcel, located at 200 Vail
Road/Lots A& C, Block 5-C, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Lodge Properties, Inc., represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
7. A request for a minor exterior alteration in CC1 and a request for a site coverage variance
from Section 18.24.150, to a commercial storefront and for an expansion to the outdoor
dining deck, in the Red Lion Building, located at 304 Bridge Street/Lots E, F, G, & H,
Block 5-A, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Landmark Commercial Development, represented by Morter Architects
Planner: Tamrnie Williamson
8, A request for a variance from Section 18.13.060 (Setbacks) to allow for a snowmelt boiler
and a snow avalanche mitigation wall in the south side setback, located at 2049 Sunburst
- Drive/Lot 1, Vail Valley 4th Filing.
Applicant: Landon and Mary Hilliard, represented by Larry Eskwith
Planner: George Ruther
9. A request for an appeal of an administrative decision regarding Section 18.64.040 (Non-
Conforming Uses), stating that private and public unstructured off-street parking is a
different land use than private and public structured off-street vehicle parking, and
therefore, an existing legal non-conforming use may not be continued.
Appellant: Pepi Gramshammer, represented by Pierce, Segerberg & Associates.
Planner: George Ruther
10. A request for an amendment to the development plan to allow for outdoor ski storage,
located at 458 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th
Filing, commonly referred to as the Golden Peak Ski Base.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
Planner: Lauren Waterton
11. A request for an appeal of a staff denial of the outdoor ski storage, located adjacent to
the Gondola Building/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Appellant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
Planner: Lauren Waterton
2
ngcnda last reviscd 4/10/97 11 am
12. A request for a vvorksession to discuss a conditional use permit to allow Type III EHUs
for seasonal housing, located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/legally described as:
beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 west of the
Sixth Principal Meridian thence S 89°31'49" E 2333.84 feet, along the North line of said
Section 9, to a point on the northerly right-of-way fence line of Interstate Highway No. 70
thence along the northerly right-of-way fence line of Interstate Highway No. 70 as follows:
S 67°41'33" W 415.82 feet; thence S78°13'02" W 1534.29 feet, to a point of curvature;
thence 456.43 feet on a curve to the right with a radius of 5580.00 feet, the chord of which
bears S80°33'38" W 456.30 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Section 9: thence
departing the northerly right-of-way fence line of Interstate Nighway No. 70 and following
the Westerly line of said Section 9, North 00°8'21 "E 565.11 feet to the point of beginning.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Andy Knudtsen and Susie Hervert
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
13. A request for a worksession to discuss a major exterior alteration in CC1 and a minor
subdivision, to allow for the construction of a parking garage, 9 accommodation units, 1
condominium and new retail office space at the Gasthof Gramshammer, located at 231
E. Gore Creek Dr./Part of Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Pepi Gramshammer, represented by Pierce, Segerberg, & Associates
` Planner: George Ruther
TABLED llNTlL APRIL 28, 1997
14. Information Update - Town Council decision on Kelton appeal - Dirk Mason
15. Appointment of PEC Representative on Open Space Committee to replace Henry Pratt.
16. Appointment of PEC Representative at DRB for the October - December 1997 quarter.
17. Appro.val of March 10, 1997 and March 24, 1997 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356
TDD for information.
Community Development Department
Published April 11, 1997 in the Vail Trail.
3 ,
.
Ii1f EMOf2AND LlM
To: Town Council
From: Andy Knudtscn, Scnior Housing Policy Planncr
Subject: Proposcd Locals Housing Work Program for Balancc of 1997
Date: April 15, 1997
A. ?ntroduction
In March 1996, staff and Council discussed the strategy to be used in our efforts to
provide locals housing. The result of the discussion (which is summarized below)
provided a framework within which to work as well as a list of prioritized actions. The
purpose of today's discussion is to:
1. Re-confirm thc dual purpose, statement and
2. Revisit the strategy and the list of prioritized actions.
In addition, we would like to preview the County's Housing Policics, which will bc
presentcd to Council on May 6, and begin discussion of how the Town of Vail may best
coordinate with Eagle County. Finally, wc would like to discuss the status of the Housing
Authority.
B. Purpose Statement
Thc purpose of thc locals housing effort is two fold: to crcate economic vitality and to
enhance our sensc of community. (This has not changed from previous discussions).
1. The lack of affordable housing within the Town of Vail affects our status
as a world-class resort. Our economic vitality is thrcatened as necessary
jobs go unfilled or are filled with unmotivated workers. Competition for
cmployees is no longer just bctween ski areas or between regions, but has
now bccome an issuc within the Vail Valley. Employecs who find housing
down valley arc likely to find jobs therc, too. This problem has directly
iinpactcd thc Town of Vail in its efforts to fill employment positions.
2. BolStering the sense of community in Vail is critical as much of the
community is made up of homes which house part-time residents.
Although able to make a unique contribution of the Town, part-time
residents are not able to fully engage on a day to day basis. The condition
improved in 1996 and 1997, as 53 local households moved into Vail
Commons. One of the new residents applied for a position on the PEC
and DRB, which is the type of involvement the Town was hoping to
encourage with the addition of housing for full-time residents. In addition,
there have been 29 deed restricted rental units created, 18 at City Market
and 11 carctaker units approved by the PEC and DRB. (The Austria Baus
development may generate an additional 6-12 deed restricted rental units.)
1
i C. Policy Framework
To address thc dual purpose, thc Town Council adoptcd thc following dircction in March
1996:
1, Focus on oppottunities WITHIN the Town limits.
2. The Town will serve as a facilitator in the provision of locals housing.
3. We will look to acquire undeveloped private lands which have existing
development rights.
4. We will acquire existing housing units and impose deed restrictions only
opportunistically and only for TOV employees.
5. We will not pursue rezoning TOV owned lands that currently are zoned
open space, nor will we pursue un-RETTing currently-owned TOV lands
at this timc.
6. We will keep condemnation as an available tool.
7. We will look to fund acquisitions of land for locals housing through sale of
other TOV-owned properties. Wc will not consider dedication a portion of
RETT funds to housing at this time, but may reconsider in five years when
the Comprehensivc opcn Lands Plan has been fully-implcmented and other
dcbts now beiiig repaid from RETT funds ai-e paid in full.
8. The return generated through the competitive RFP process used for Vail
Commons has becn successful in thc past and may be worth replicating.
Proposed Revisions
Some of thcse policies nced to bc rcviscd or updated. Making number four a priority
could result in an increase of the supply of affordable housing, and whilc requiring
funding, the cost would be less than what devcloping new housing stock would cost. Thc
current wording states that the Town will not activcly pursuc this option. Staff has
included it in the list of options which follow and thinks that it may warrant a hi;her
priority and a rnore proactive appi•oach.
Number scven (funding source) and number threc (site acquisition) are directly related to
cach other. Without a funding source, site acquisition is a remote possibility. Staff has
listed both of these items for discussion. We suggest that both should be considered or
both should be placed together in a low priority category.
One of the policies which should be added specifies the target market of our efforts.
Tiuee separate groups have been identified and include: seasonal wage earners, year-round
renters, and permanent home owners.
2
D. Critical Strategies
The four critical strategies adonted in 1996 were:
l. Maintain cxisting rental housing base in Vail.
2. Dcvclop the maximiun feasible number of seasonal housing units at the public
works site.
3. Work with the USFS on a pilot projcct.
4. ldentify and commit to a sitc or sites within Vail to accommodate 50 to 75 units of
new rental housing for locals.
Work has becn undertaken on each of thc four top strategie5 over the last vcar.
1. ; Seasonal Housing - Maintaining thc size of the current rental pool continues to be
a top priority. Because the nature of the discussion involves potential real estate
acquisition, additional information will be pc•esentcd in executive session.
2. Public Works - Devcloping seasonal housing at the Public Works site is well
underway. The project is currently under review at the PEC and DRB level. Staff
anticipates construction to begin in mid to late May and be eompleted for
occupancy in late 1997.
3. Pilot Project - Thrcc parccls of land havc reccntly becn exchanged from the USFS
to thc TOV relatcd to housing. Thesc arc thc Rcd Sandstonc site, the triangle ncxt
to the Town Manager's lots, and the mitigation area behind the Public Works
facility (indirectly rclated to housing). The Red Sandstone projcct is schedulcd and
budgeted to be constructed in 1998, a portion of which will be constructed on land
exchanged from the USFS. Staff plans to begin work with the community,
concerning the Town Manager's lots, in a public process during 1998 in
preparation for construction in 1999.
There are few other options for futurc exchangcs. Staff looked at other land held
by the Forest Service not included in the land exchange for a potential pilot
project, but found none that lent itself to developmcnt.
4. Site Acquisition for Rental Housing - Only two to three privately held, large
undeveloped parcels cxist in the Town. One parccl had been identified and
budgeted for acquisition; however, competing community necds (the West Vail
roundabout) eliminated the available funds for this project. There may be a
significant opportunity within the Lionshead redevelopment to find parcels of land
for the scale of development originally intended. Staff understands that the scale
(50-75 dwelling units) is the smallest number of units that can be considered to
make a tax creclit scenario economically viable.
3
E. Proposed Priorsty of Actions
A summary of the proposed priority actions are shown below with a dctailed explanation of each
provided on thc following pagcs.
Hig~h Prioritv
1. Construct the Public Works seasonal housing developmcnt.
2. Maintain existing rental housing base in Vail.
3. Identify a funding sourcc.
4. Incorporate housing within the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
5. Develop an employee generation ordinance (that would be adopted County-wide).
6. Complete a county-wide needs assessmcnt in late 97 and early 98.
7. Rcvise TOV zoning codc to require cai•etakcr units in the dcvelopment of large homes
(c.g.; 3,000 sq. ft. and larger).
Medium-Prioritv
1. Purchase existing individual units, deed restrict the unit, sell to locals at reduced rates.
2. Build upon suggestions from the Community Activism/Vail Tomorrow process,
3. Acquire large undeveloped ptivately hcld parcels.
4. Determine future use of Berry Creek Sth Filing.
Low Prioritv/Othcr Potential Actions
1. Ci•cate Land - look for locations for development which are not currently availabie, such
as thc tops of the parking structures.
2. Donovan Park - considcr using portions of land currcntly zoncd opcn space.
3. Enforcement - verify existing units are in compliance with deed restrictions.
4. Updatc thc existing housing code - rcvise code to make it more uscr friendly.
5. Rent Control - consider additional rcgulation to provide more affordably ri d housing.
1998 Projccts
1. Town Mgr's Lots - Community cngagement regarding the potential for 12-16 owner-
occupied, deed-restricted homes in duplex style development
(construction in 1999).
2. A-Frame - Community engagement regarding the potential for two owner-
occupied homes and a caretaker apartment (construction in 1999).
3. Red Sandstone - Construction of 17 deed-restricted condominiums for Town of Vail
and Water District employces.
Other
l . Eagle County
2. Town of Vail Housing Authority '
4
F. Councel Action IRequested
Staff is presenting this information to the Council for its review. Staff plans to i•eturn to the
Council in approximately one month to bring closure to the list of priority actions. In the interim,
the Council will hcar a variety of othcr ideas concerning affordable housing, including the Vail
Tomorrow community generated recommcndations, Lionshead redevelopmcnt possibilities, and
thc Eagle County Housing Policies. There may be syncrgy among the different groups which may
influence the direction the Town will take in the housing effort.
At this time, staff requests that Council higlllight thc actions stcps of particular interest. Staff will
then take these, research them, providing additional information for the Council to use in its
decision making process.
5
APPIENDIX A
Detailed explanations of proposed critical strategies.
In order to help the Council evaluate the list of potential actions, staff has listed criteria to
cvaluatc the options:
Effectiveness in creating occupied housing stock. What gives us the most bang for our
buck?
Imrnediatc financia] cost to the Town. What is the impact on the municipal budget?
Staff /Council time. In general, how many hours of tirne will be required?
Political viability. Will the climate "out there" accept a certain coneept?
Number of months nceded to accomplish the task. How long will it take?
Wha!are the people who can make it happen? Who are the "doer•s?" Is there staff,
consultant, or other capacity?
High Priority Actions
l. Public Works
Project involves constructing 24 seasonal housing units for critical Town of Vail employees at the
Public Works facility. The PEC and DRB review of the project is well underway. Staff believes
„ that the project will bcgin construction by mid to late May for completion in late 1997.
Effcctivcness: high, as it creatcs 24 units
Cost to Town: high
Staff/Council timc: high
Viability: high, project is well into design phase
Months: 10
Doer: Andy Knudtsen, Susie Hervcrt
2. Maintaining the existing supply of rental housing
o Maintaining the size of the current rental pool of seasonal housing continues to be a top priority.
Becausc the nature of the discussion involves potential real estate acquisition, additional
information will be presented in executive session.
3. Identify a Funding Source
Potential options include:
a. Lodging Tax with a sunset provision.
b. Additional Sales tax.
c. A portion of the Real Estate Transfer Tax.
d. County-wide trust, funded by new tax yet to be determined (similar to Regional
Transportation Tax).
6
Community receptivcncss to this concept may bc challenging. If the Town is to move in thc
direction of dedicating any funding source, a full cffoit to engage the community will bc required.
Staff bclieves thcrc are sevcral options for this source, as listcd abovc, and may include a County
widc cffort. Any cffort towards this must includc community input, such as focus groups with
various parts of the community a5 wcll as a deteimination of the funding necded to accomplish
defined housing goals. Presenting an open-ended proposal may not be as effective as studying the
nceds, determining the cost of ineeting the need, and then determining the source to cover the
Specific cost. To that end, staff believes that the Town should participate in a County-widc
housing needs assessmcnt to begin in December of this year. The study will take approximately
3-4 months to complctc.
There are two compelling reasons the Council may want to consider dedicating a portion of the
Real Estate Transfer Tax. Concerning open space acquisition, the Town adopted the Open Lands
Plan in 1994,1o determine which lands to acquirc. An inventory of all undeveloped parcels in and
around the municipal limits was completcd. 51 parcels were determined to have open space
value. Of the parcels identified in that plan, 38 have been purchased. Of the 13 remaining, eight
can be acquircd at no cost to the Town. The remaining fivc have significant obstacles prcvcnting
development whether or not the parcels are TOV owned, although the plan does call for the
Town to eventually purchase these lots. Secondly, an ongoing dcdicated expense of the fund
covcrs dcbt service on the golf coursc note, which will be retired in two years. (Thc last timc this
will be in the budget is FY99.) The annual payment is $340,000.
Effectivene5s: very high
Cost to Town: low
Staff/Council timc: vcry high
Viability:
Months: 6
Doer: Town Council
4. Lionshead fftedeveYopenent IVflaster 1P9an
Thcre are several sites within thc Lionshcad study arca which arc cither used as employee housing
(such as thc Sunbird), or which could be devcloped as housing (such as the VA shops, former
Public Service parcel, Old Town shops, or the two surface parking lots). Other uses may be
competing for the available space.
The site on which the Town has the greatest influencc is the Old Town shops, which is currently
used for a gymnastics studio and storage for various Town departments. Vail Associates has
requested an easement through the property for snow-cat access to the mountain, which may limit
the redevelopment potential.
What would the Town like to see in the master plan for redevelopment of Lionshead? Responses
from the current phase of the Lionshead master planning will be presented to Council on April 22,
1997, and staff recommends that we incorporate ideas regarding Housing with the larger
recommendation.
Effectiveness: high
7
Cost to Town: high
Staff/Councii timc: low or high, depcnding on approach takcn
Viability: high, given the amount of change anticipated in the area as a result
of thc master plan.
Months: 12
Doer: Town of Vail, Vail Associates, othcr private interests
5. Employee Generation Ordinance - County-wide
An "Employee Generation" ordinancc would require developers of any commcrcial expansion in
the Town to provide housing for a portion af thc employees gcnerated by thc new commercial
square footage. Other mountain resort communities (Aspen, Whistler, Telluride) have adopted
thcse types of ordinances. In Aspen, the employee generation code requirements have brought
about more housing units than other efforts of the municipality. A key component of this tool is
that it would!ideally be adopted by all the entities in thc Valley to bc effective and to avoid
crcating advantages or disadvantages among the different municipalities.
Thcre are some variations on this basic concept which could be included with the proposed
ordinancc. Thc first is to providc a cash-in-licu option, allowing individuals to pay into a fund,
rather than construct a unit. Thc Town of Whistler has amassed a small fortune through the cash-
in-lieu provision, but is unabie to put togethcr a housing development that the community can .
support. As a result, the fund collects interest. Staff, therefore, bclieves that there should be a
disincentive to opt out of the construction requirement with a cash payment.
A sccond variation is to establish value ratios for the typc of product provided by the commercial
developer. In the recent past, the Town has rcquired SDD developers to providc housing units to
fulfill one of the review criteria. To mcet the requirement, developers have dced restricted
cxisting units. In an effort to creatc additional housing stock, staff is proposing that the new
ordinance includc ratios to incent developers to provide new housing stock.
Effectiveness: high
Cost to Town: 1ow
Staff/Council time: high
Viability: medium
Months: 4
Doer: Vail Tomorrow/Leadership Coalition/Eagle County Housing Task
Forcc/Avon and County staff leadcrship
6. Laying Ground work for County , wide needs assessment
The viability of any future funding source depends on a thorough, concrete plan for spending the
revenue. Even if a funding source is identified which does not require an election, the community
will still want to know the extent, need, cost, time frame and why it requires a dedicated funding
source. A comprehensive needs assessment is the tool that can provide answers to these
questions.
The last housing needs assessment was completed in 1990 by RRC. An update would be useful
for comparison purposes. It would also explain in greater detail the different needs of the various
8
parts of thc Vallcy and recommend solutions on an individual municipal basis as wcll as a
rcgional basis. Initial estimates for this effort ball park thc cost at $25,000. Staff bclicve the cost
should bc shared among the various player>s.
Effectiveness: medium
Cost to Town: low ($7,000 - $10,000)
Staff/Council time: low; burden should be on County
Viability: shared cost could present problem, need a"glue person" to
champion the projcct.
Months: 3
Doer: County Staff
7. Cae-eta?cer Requireanent
Similar to an "employee generation" ordinance for commercial redevelopment, this ordinance
would rec}uire new residential development and residential redevelopment to shoulder its fair
share of the load. For example, the Town could require all new residcnces of 3,000 square feet or
more to include a caretaker unit. The requirement could apply strictly to demo/rebuild5 or could
apply to all residential development. It could include a"cash-in-licu" provision to allow people
the option of having an on-site caretaker or providing funds to the Town for it to use in other
projects.
County-wide approach is better than just Town of Vail. There are othcr issues to considcr when
proposing a method to creatc more carctakcr apartments in town. The three steps involved in this
approach warrant discussion: constructing the unit (or gctting cash-in-lieu), getting it occupied,
and cnsuring a rcasonable rent. Each of the three present significant challcnges to the Town. The
concept, as described, focuses on the first of these three steps. The other two are significant
projects in themselves, and are addressed separately, bclow, under the headings "Enforcement"
and "Rcnt Control".
Effcctiveness: medium
Cost to Town: low
Staff/Council time: high
Viability: medium to high
Ivlonths: 3
Doer: Vail Tomorrow/Andy Knudtsen
9
1VIid Prioa'itv
Purchase Existing Individual Unrts
A rclatively cost cffective way to crcatc additional deed restricted affordable housing would bc to
buy existing units, deed restrict them, and then scll to locals who would owner-occupy the units.
Deed restrictions would likely include the same standards of Vail Commons, but could, in theory,
be tailored to a specific situation.
Effcctivencss: mcdium
Cost to Town: medium
Staff/Council time: medium
Viability: high
Months: on-going (4 units per year)
Doer: Andy Knudtsen, Tom Moorhead
2. Acquire large undeveloped privately held parcels.
There are two or three ]arge undeveloped, privately held parcels in the Town which could be
developed as housing. The cost would be high, but thc limited options for development now or in
the future suggest that acquiring the land for future development should be done sooner than later
if Council would like to pursuc this option.
Effectiveness: high
Cost to Town: high
Staff/Council time: high
Viability: low, without funding
Months: 3 to 4
Doer: Andy Knudtsen, Tom Mooncead
3. Berry Creek Sth Filing.
Berry Creek presents a large potential to address a variety of community needs. Given that the
current housing strategy of the Town of Vail is to focus on housing within the town limits, the
dcvelopment of Berry Creck may not directly benefit thc Town's effort to provide housing for
wage carning employees of local businesses or help in the effort to improve thc Town's sense of
community. Understanding that there are on-going discussions regarding the use or disposal of
this land, staff believes the Town should, to the extent it can, use the investment it originally made
to benefit residents of the Town.
10
Othes- Potengsal Aclions
1. Community Activfison Vail Tomorrow
What projccts will be put forth by Vail Tomorrow which will require staff and Council time to
implemcnt? Three of the four subgoups rnay have rccommendations which includc housing
(Building Commtinity, Affordable Housing, Regional Cooperation). Some ideas which are
currently undcr discussion include: Timber Ridge, RETT, and Lionshcad establishing a County-
widc Trust Fund, and requesting the Town and VA to create incentives to make housing
available.
2. Create Land
During a brainstorming process, staff suggested that there are potential land areas for housing
which don't currently "exist." Using the spacc above both the Lionshead and Village parking
structures arc the most obvious examples. Othcr areas may be available, such as large rights-of-
way that are not needed or unused land currcntly part of existing home owners associations.
Although not as readily obtainablc, thcse typcs of parcels have potential.
3. Donovare Park
The middle and upper benches of Donovan Park are good locations for housing for several
reasons, although community approval of such a plan may be difficult to achieve. The two areas
are rclatively level, have good vehicular access, havc ncarby utilitics, and do not share thc same
. rccrcational or riparian qualitics of thc lowcr bcnch. Thc uppcr and middle bcnches of Donovan
Park are two of several parccls owned by the Town which are cw•rently zoned open space. Partial
devclopment of these lands may become more realistic as other options are exhausted. Options
for purchasing privately held parcels are quite limited as well as quite expensive. Maintaining thc
open spacc and recreational uses are critical; howcvcr, in some cases this can be donc in addition
to limited dcvclopmcnt of parcels for housing.
4. Emforcernent
To cnsure the existing deed restricted housing stock is either occupied by local employces or is
bcing made available to local employees, staff mails a letter to the owners to check on
compliance. This approach relies on the response of the owner, and staff does not currently
follow up with site visits or other more effective (albcit rnore intrusive) techniques. Staff could
allocate more time to this issue, if Council wants to champion this causc.
5. Update the existfing housing code
It would be hclpful for those trying to understand and use our Code to take the existing Employee
Housing section and revise it so that it is better organized and incorporates all of the different
types of units. Specifically, a revision could address the Vail Commons and Red Sandstone
developments and codify the standards associated with them. As part of this re-write, staff could
also make minor policy changes to reflect the current needs of the community.
6. Rent Contro?
In some of the newer deed restricted employee housing units, staff has learned that small one and
two bedroom units have been rented for over $1000 dollars. ln the past, former Councils have
reviscd the deed restriction language to include requirement that owners of these units rent the
units at market rates. The purpose of thc change was to prevent owners from using these
restricted units for personal use, such as extra space for guests. The Council did'not want to
11
introduce rent control to thc dced restrictions at the timc and were comfortablc with languagc
requiring the unit to bc rentcd at markct rate. Howcver, the high rents which owners arc ablc to
rcccive arc an indication of the limited availability of options. Steps toward making this housing
morc affordable may be warranted.
12
1998 1Pu-ojects
1. 'Vown Manager's ]Lots
Staff anticipates bcginning the community dialog about developmcnt of housing ncxt to thc Town
Managcr's house in 1998. If approved, construction would bc set for 1999. The two diffcrent
parcels involved include the four lots currently annexed and zoned for primary -secondary
devclopment as wcll as thc triangular shaped parcel reccntly acquired by thc Town from the USFS
as part of the Land Ownership Adjustment. It must be annexed and zoned prior to development.
The total acreage of both parcels is 3.58 acres. In the past, iieighbors have expressed interest in a
park for this site. Staff believes a pocket park should be included in the design.
The land that is currently zoned is made up of four platted lots, which would allow four duplexes
or eight dwelling units. Staff believes the adjacent parcel has the potential for a similar density.
At this time, we_antici.pate deed restricting the dcvelopment, using restrictions similar to Vail
Commons, which will require the units to be otivner occupied, require occupants to work an
average of 30 hours/week in Eagle County, and limits resale value to 3% annuat appreciation. All
of thesc concepts are dependent on the support of the community for additional housing.
2. A-Frame
„ The Town acquired the A-framc, locatcd at 2657 Arosa Drive, as part of the Trapper's Run
purchase. It is a separate lot from the rest of the land and is currently developed with a single
family home. This past winter, the Town rented the residence to four seasonal workers, two of
whom worked for the Town as bus drivers. The site's development potential allows for a duplex
with a caretaker unit. Staff recommends including thc discussions of the redevelopment of this
sitc in the public process for the Town Manger's lots. The time frame would sct community
involvement in 1998 and possible and construction in 1999. Note that the Town could redevelop
the site or could dced restrict thc lot, seil it, and iet others develop it.
3. Rec6 Sandstone
The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District initiated the 17 unit condominium development
located at 945 Red Sandstone road and receivcd PEC approval in 1996. Construction will not
proceed in 1997, as construction costs for the design have run higher than anticipated. After
"value engineering" the design, the board plans to proceed with construction in 1998.
13
tner
1, Eagle County Draft Housing Plan
David Cartcr, the Housing Coordinator with Eaglc County, will present a 12 item list of potential
policics which Eagle County may adopt. "The purpose of his presentation is to get housing input
from all communitics in the County prior to presenting thc plan to the County Commissioners.
Hc has idcntified three items from thc total pool which havc the greatest potential to generate
housing. These include: a downpavment assistance program, a county-wide emp._.loyee generation
ordinance, and a density bonus program which would motivate developers to include cmployee
housing. (His plan docs not address Berry Creek.) A draft of the policics arc attached to this
memo as Exhibit B. Prior to his presentation on May 6, staff recommends that the Council
identify the policies which could be effective within the Town, as well as the County. These
policies may shape the role the Town can play in conjunction with the County.
2, Housing Authority
In the past, the Town Council ]ooked to community volunteers to assist the Council in creating
employee housing. The Council established the Housing Authority to formalize the group's
efforts. After some efforts to creatc housing were put forth, lcadership and motivation within the
group changed and it has been inactive for approximately thrce years. Since then, the Community
Development Department has been reorganized, and staff has been dedicated to the housing
effort. With staff working directly with Council, utilizing the knowledge and assistance of the
Planning and Environmcntal Commission, as well as formalizcd public input. The adciitional
review by the Housing Authority has not been necessary. At this time, staff recommends
maintaining the structure of the board so that future Councils could fill empty seats and easily
rcactivate the board, if necded. Until such a need exists, staff recommends the Council not
appoint members to the inactive board.
14
' SF~NT 8Y: 3-31-97 ~ 14:37 ;CommunltyDevelopnent- 9704792452;# 2/ 3
Exhibit ~
~~APTER 5
EAGLE COIlJN'g'Y HOvSING PQDLgC~S AND AcCB'dON STEPS
DRAP
l
3/3/97
SE7VT BY* 3-31-97 : 14:37 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 9704792452;# 3l•°9 Introduction ' This cbapter begins with the definition of Rffordable housing which will be used by Ea.gle
County. It then contains the policies and action steps which have been developed based
dn the housing needs iden9:ified earlier. These include people payir,g high amounts of
thcir ancomes for housing, inability to puirchase, having to live with roommates to share
housing costs, and comt.nuting long distances. They also take into account the obstacles
identified carlicr, as the policies need tc? be directed at overcoming them.
The policies and action steps are also based on a r.ecobmition that there is no sangle
svlution, but rather there is a need for a varicty of approaches. In addition, they reflect an
effort to hive an overall program that is equitable. Thc entire community is affected by
the affordnble housing issue asxd the cng.ire community needs to be involved in its
solution.
Definition of Affordable Iiousing
Affordablc b.ousing is housing which serves the housing needs of very low (0-50% of
Mmedian income), low (50-80% of inedian income), and maderate incame (80-1201/o of
Ynedian income) households. Rental hausing can have pross remts (rent plus utilities) up
to 30% of incame. For-sale housing prices ahoald not result in monthly housing
payments of more than 28% of income with a S% down pa_yment and a 30-year
martgage.
Vision Statement
Affordable housing is a major prioriiy of Eag1e Caunty. There should be a wide variety
of housing ta fulfill the needs of a11 its residents, including families, seni.or Gitizens, those
who work bere, and particularly those in the very low, low and moderate income groups.
Ele.ments of Eag1e County's vision for hausing are:
• Housing should be located in close praximity to existing community centers where
public infrastructure and services, camnnercial, and recyeational facilities are
provided.
o Housitag is primarily a private sector activity. The public role is to serve as a catalyst
and eacout'age housing through policies, regulativns, and participation in
. 2
` SENT'BY: 3-31-97 ; 14:38 ;CommunltyDeveiopment- 9704792452;# 4/ 9
public/private parfierships go ffieet hotasing needs not being adequately produced by
the privage sector.
o Building affordable housing can involve considerahle rask for pravate sector
developers and this risk needs to be reduced so ehat dervelopers will build more
hoaasing which is afforc?able t0 9ocal residents. Production of Bnore affordable units gs
. crucial to solving the probleYn.
0 Persons avho wark in Etagle County ghould have adeqaate housinb opporfiunities
wittain the Coun4y so thcy do mot hawe to commute from other counfies.
Q AffordaUfle housing shouldl generally bc dispersed throughout the County and
appropriately scaled to fhc meighborhood in whic}u it is located.
T&ie County's policies and iurnplegnenting actions follow from this vision.
~
Housung PoQa~ies auud Acanaaa Sgeps
The infonna8ion belowr ns organized with each policy statement listed first, fol?ovved by
i4s nmplememfing acti.ons. ffo Eagfle Cmunty weED a~ork in comperatiom weth the pruvate ~ector to develop
~ affou-dstbBe houseng. .
Il. Cireate a system of incen4nves to induce the pruvaY.e sector iato prvducing
. affordable houasing in such voYume so as to significantYy satisfy the deanand for
affordabfle housirng. Developer.s seeking 8o ha.we their developments cnnsidered
as affoirdable housimg vvi16 submit the followifig: a) evidence of cons4xaction
and/or permanent frnancing, b) building constraacfion plans, and c) otheg
'anfoeYnation tfie County may request. I'ossible ancentives include the
folloeving: .
Developmetai Stamdards:
~ Cgeating density bonuses in thc form of additiona? dwclling uaints. If
densiey bonuscs are adopted, they sbould be allawed onYy where tteey
supply hoaasing for cicarly expressed comrnunity needs, and should be
coupled with limitations on the future nse and saYe of the housing units.
3
SM BY: 3-31-97 : 14:38 XommunltyDevelopment- 9704792452;# 5/•-9 o Encoiuage the development of secondary units by rewriting regulations so
the construction of a secondary unit is a use by right in appropriate zone -
diSbnCt.S diroUghout the COUrity.
o Explore options for fle7cible developm.ent standards.
* Request Colarado Division of Housing evaluate Eagle Coun.ty Land iJse
Regulations and perntits ao recommend revisions of any requiretnents that
may udd unnecessaril.y to the cost of housing development.
b Encourage housing wliich can be added on to incrementally by owners after
purchase - for example, unfinishcd baseYnents, to bring down initial costs. .
('ost Reducti n Measures:
m Reducing, waiving, ur deferring fees such as diose for development review
and platting, bu.ilding permits/plan review, Knc1 impact fees for ruads.
0 Provide fiuanci.al assistance to developers for infrastructure development.
+Modify collateral requireinents for subdivision improvement agreements.
0 Changing the way infrastructure costs are assessed abainst development so
that costs are assessed by the square foot, rather than by the unit, to make
smaller units more affordable.
4 •`1Vorkfng with water and sewer providers ta reduce tap fees for affordable
bousing.
0 I'roviciing in-kind public facilities and services for construction use.
~ PuUing affordable housing at beghnning of Planning Commission and
BOCC meeting agendss.
s Modifying transit routes.
2. Amend zoning regulations to permit affordable housing as a use by right an.d
revise planned unit deeelopment regulations to promote affordable housing.
3. Facilitate tax-exempt bond financing for affordable housing. This could take
the forro of addi.tiozual 6320 projects, bonds issued through the housing
authority, bonds issued throubh the County, bonds issued through nonprof t
5 01(c)3 corporations, private activity bonds and ather sources.
4. Support applications by developers for state and federal assistance. Assist and
encawrage developers to use state and federay housing programs.
5. Seek to obtain state and fedeffal franding, particularly CDBG, fiOME and
Section 8 funds, tn subsidize the cost of aff'ordable housing.
4
` SFNT'BY: 3-31-97 ; 14:38 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 9704792452;# 6/ 9
6. Seek to at4ract and encourage developers 4o produce very low-, loev- and
modevate-income housing. Brimg together coopcratiye partners and consicfler
public-private and public-Yionprofit partnerships. lEncourage developera to build smaailer homes on snnaller lots. I'ublicize affordable houshig so9ulions Ly
area bunldcrs. I7evelop an award to present to developers of affordable
Ihousing.
7. Provide uifaranation to $he business community om vvh$t etnployers can do to
help dheir employees with housing in order to promote volun9ary ernployer
p"cip$tion programs. 5ucb steps include 8he fallmwing:
• Committing to gn$ster Yease uanits, especially prior to constnuction
• Investirig in apartment projects fhrough equity, buying up bonds, providirig
up-front development costs, etc.
• Gtaaranteeing fleases .
• Consqnnctong miits - either on or off site
a Acquirflng ovvgership of units
a Providing dowm peyment aud mor4gage nssistance. For exanple, ftands
. cauld me lent for dowm payinent and/or closnng cosYs with payroll
deductions mmde for repayment Altematively, funds could be len.t as a
secondl mortgage. Also co-sign6ng or guaranteeing mortgage loans.
• Contrnbu9ing 4o a damage deposit pool so employees would n.ot have to pay
such a high up-front security deposit,
• Providing 8oans or oYher help with rental deposits required to move in
8. Work vvith financia9 insfihttions to meet their obligafions under ghe Community
Reirnwes9ment Act.
U. Afffmirdab9e housnng uo an issaae w8euch Eugle County needs to address in
i1:0opVEr81t[oQll 179@th the mUIlH9icBpalH$Aes Hn the co9DQHty.
~ L Contact the tovvms witlein ihe county to explore the establishment of a rcgional
onwlta juu-isdictioraal housing authority.
2. Seave as a source mf technical assistance to Yowns.
3. Emeourage towms to endorsc plan o.r portioxn of nt.
. 5
SE7VT 6Y: 3-31-97 : 14:39 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 9704792452;# 7/ 9'
M. Steps should 6e taken to facilitate increased home ownership lby residents af
Eagle County.
1. Apply for an allocation of bond cap to start a mortgage credit certifiicate
progratn.
2. Develop mortgage assistnnce programs. Thcse could include the following: a
down payment assiatancc program, purchasir,g points on home loans to buy
down the infcrest ra.te, guaranteeing rnortgage loans, etc.
3. Contiudue efforts to develop a rent-to-ovvn progam.
IV. Adcflitioaea6 affordab9e rental uni4s for permaneant residents should be braught
on Iene.
1. Seek to develop additional low-income housing tac credit and tax-exempt bond
projects.
V. Winter seasona1 housing needs to be further addressed and is primaril,y the
responsibitity of seasonal employers. However, Eagte Cmunty shouHd 6e very
supportiae of emplayepa seeking to address their msonal housing needs.
1. Encourage rnajor seasonal employers tv develop housing praducts spccifically
for seasonal employees ncar their places of eYnployment
VI. loiew e'esidential subdiviseons vvill contain a percentage of thear units for very
low,, Ilow- and moderate-income permanent residents. The f'irst preferenee
far the9e unigs wi[1 be un-site within the subdivision. 1'he second pe-eference
wirl be having units be buelt in the nearest eacisting communaty eenter. As a
, last optian, Eagle County can accept payenent or other resources an lieu off
constructian, which funds or other re.cources will be set aside by EagDe
Coeam9y for affordalble hoeaiting.
1. Develop regulations requiring new residenrial subdivisions provide a
percentage nf hoiising for vcry low-, low-, and maderate-incoYne households.
'I'hhe percentage will be lowest for units provided within the development,
6 •
' SFNI` BY: 3-31-97 ; 14:39 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 9704792452;# 8/ 9
higher for unigs provnided c?sewhere, and highest when cash, land or other
resources are proaided in lieu of such housing. The units built undeir this
requireffiemt wnll be deed-restricted.
1YHe (Couanmercnafl annd nndausta'ua9 deve9opnttnts genee'atfiatg 6uncre$sed eenployment
wnlH proa6de afffordable ?nousinge ZI'he frst prefererace w181 be ffoA units on-se$e
where gceasib9e, or if nmt feasab?e, in ttae n~~rest existaa~g community centere As
a IlasQ ~ptioan9 Eag9e Coaanty casa anccept paymeng or other resoeerc.es in 9neu off
construcQaony vshach ffuuads ou~ other resoeerces wiVO be seg asIlde by Emgae
(County for affordabHe 9amaasange
1. 17evelop regu?aiimns requiring e8nployers to provide housing ffor a certain
percentage af thcir new employces. '1'he peTcentage will be lowest for units
providcd on,site or nearby, and high.er when cash, laaid or other resources are
provaded in lgeu of laousing. VICfld. The ECoanuaty wn19 seelk tm m2ke 9mnd avaaYab9e for af¢'ordable housing,
1. gdentafy sites tha4 are mpst suatable for affordable housing. Included as part of
this effort; conducY anventory of cotuflty, town, school distri.ct, special district
state, and fcderal llands go determine which might be suitable for affordable
hoaisnng.
2. Explore opfioyns to use cotanity, town, scbool dis9rict speciaY district, state, U.S.
Forest Service and Bureau of Land A/Ianagement lands for affordable hotasgnb.
3. Acyuire 1and and prowide nt below cOst for housling. Have the actual hoeasing
be developed throtagh mu R.F.P. process. 5ome of the flands acquired could
also be he1d for laYad banking for futare affordable housing use.
DL MIIxed M9e devrE8opE0EeitIlt4 flYl ~~~~~pr981te OpeAtAOns Slre 6•nCOflII%'ageal.
1. Exarninc fland use regulations to exp)are options fog acYditional mixcd use,
ittcfliadang havinb resadential ower coffimerciafl, and having residemtial as a uase
by right uti commerciafl districts.
. 7
SEIVT BY: 3-31-97 ; 14:39 ;CommunltyDevelopment- 9704792452;# 9/,9 X. Mamile homes and rnodalar housing are an impor8amt part af Eagle Caunty's
housirag stock.
1. New mobile home subdivisions, modular home subdivisions, and moUile hotrae
parks well be encotuaged. These dcvcloprnents should be of hi.gh quality, with
appropeia.te landscaping.
XI. There is a need to segment a portion of the lhousyng nnarket to protect local
resideaats from having to copnpete with second home buyers. Where public
assistance or subsidies ure providec~ ~or housing, there shouid generally be
limat,s on price appreciation, as well as reiiidency requicements.
l Ilifaintain and enhance the County's deed restriction program.
%dI. Eagle iCounty recognizes that affordable housing is an ongoing issue.
1. Establish a housing trust fund.
2. Establish an ongoing group of community members to work on housing issues.
3. Mairitain housing data base.
8
i
RECEIVED APR 1 4 1997
NIEMORANDUIVi
To: Eagle County Recreation Authority Board of Directors
Rick Pylman, Peter Jamar's Office
From: Ken Marchetti
Date: April 11, 1997
Subject: Joint Planning with Miller Ranch Property
Attached is information which has been provided by Tom Braun related to the joint plann.ing of
Miller Ranch and Beny Creek 51 Filing. The School District wanted to have a meeting on
Tuesday, April 15 to discuss this information but due to conflicting schedules, it was not possib le
to get everyone together. However, we wanted you to have an opportunity to review the
information prior to the School District's meeting on April 16.
MILLER RANCH
CONCEPTUAL DE'VELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
Conceptual Development Alternatives A, B and C represent three potential schemes for how the Miller
Ranch may be developed in the future. These schemes are not development proposals. Rather, they aze
intended to present alternatives for how uses and activities could be located on the site at some point in the
future. The following "givens", or assumptions, regarding future land uses were used in the preparation
of these three alternatives:
1) A joint-use aareement will be established with the Eagle Counry Recreation Authority which will
allow the District to locate schooUcommunity recreation facilities on the Berry Creek Sth Filing.
2) Parcel5, the 23 acre river-front parcel located south of the rail road tracks will be preserved as
open space.
3) Land will be reserved for the future development of high school and related facilities.
4) Land will be reserved for the future development of an elementary school and related facilities.
5) Land will be reserved for the future development of staff housing.
6) Land will be reserved for the development of future "alternative uses" which may include:
• Charter school
• Administration building
• Bus/transit maintenance faciliry
• Early learninQ programs
• Secondary/continuing education
7) Depending upon the long term needs of the District, land reserved for future altemative uses could
involve non-school related uses.
LAND USE SUMM[ARY
USE ALT. B ALT. B ALT. C
Future high school 18 acres (10*) 16 acres (8*) 9 acres (14*) -
Berry Creek Middle School 13 acres 15 acres 13 acres
Future elementary school 10 acres 10 acres 9 acres
Staff housing 5 acres . 6 acres 11 acres
Alternative Uses 12 acres 11 acres ' 16 acres '
Land Bank 10 acres 10 acres 10 acres
Cemetery 1 acre 1 acre 1 acre
River front open space 23 acres 23 acres 23 acres
Other(open space,roads, etc.) 16 acres 16 acres 16 acres
TOTALS 108 acres 108 acres 108 acres .
* Acreage indicates the portion of high schooUcommunity recreation facilities located on Berry Creek Sth
Filing. Total acreage of high school includes acreage listed and acreagP in parenthesis. •
.
~
~
~ -
~
i ' • ~ ~`iW~i9.iOSlyd'il`6T el.Ol'6~.'itC11 66~ao
r
ILI
i
liffi.LER RANCH
~
fagle Coanry School Districl RE-501 ~
l 194!
. •;,z: J ~J e . ~ enunAm«Iew APO I
~ ~ ' ~?~1 . ` \ ' .
`Y` ~1-r~~4,;¢~., h'~~~ i
ff~
~J~.
Al , ~ • s ~
~ ~ ~ j• ~ ' , .~.2,. ~ .t,~. ca.Pxic scua ~
j vz' A ~ ! ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~-t--:-t~~~ ~
n. Berry Crak 51b Filiug,' ? I
~ ~ / ~i ~ • ' ` I
`
St
v
.,,,1-
;
~ ! : ~ ~ ' ~ . - ~ - - -
If
. .~a ,,R, . ~ ~ 1 ` ~Mi~ ` j~---•r- ~ I` ,y~'- i!F ,
(,V•/ r~ '1"' ~ IIAms~ ~?I ~ l ~ Ji' ~`n~''
' ~ J~ 111 Au~
p ~ ~ la \ .,I ~ ~ '`l'~ \A --•^~~..d~ ~ ' .~~~,~~~~~J _ ~ 4~~' .i~' I
I - o\ f ' \ ~ ? ~I _ ~ ' ~J,.,~~ ~y ~ ,,._~~A / ~ I
~ . ' ~ : ~at
i~~ ~~~n~ _ >Y o a - - ~ ~a
~
. V~.
, I ~ 7r~nt_ a;~ ~P - . _ . . , ~
I . .i 7-.-7-
~ .
~
i
~
i
i
I
DEVELOPN[ENT CONCEP'd' 6V9
; . . MI.L R RANCH
,
,
EapJe Coantr Stdool D'utrict RE-50J
e- e..d~ npn. 1vs7 ~
r
~
i ,,'S• "1. v ~a,~ I
A.
~i~~ , - ~ i
cn,~rwc scut
'rF _I^ I
• _ Bern~ Creek4th Fileg
i ~ . ~ , t ~ ` ^q~^`~ 1,~ I
1 ~ \ ~ i 'l _""c r I
I =S j'~ i~ ~ ~•Y ~ I ` _ ~ _ ` ~ 'i - • :-n,
,
+J ~~~~9V ~ ~ J_~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~~f ~ ~/i. `
, .
,
, _
~ , . ~..~1'°, ` ~ - ~ zuk
.
, . _
, . , .
ro '!-~N • - ~ ^
; .r•~= ; - . . , -!,I~r . i \ ~ . - - Y •
,
6
~
-
~
`E"'^-.~t__ _,v~~`~ M'`'` ' .^~",''~~'~'l . . ` .--.•-~.1.
i
~
i
i
i
DEVELOPMENT CONCEP7[' G6~f'~99 i
Nffi,L~R RArv 11 ~
~
,
~ . • ~ Earle Caunry School District RE-SOJ
l~. Bnnn Aoeriein Aprll 1991
F ~ yav \
71
'4 Y R \ \ ~ \
~ • ~ V ` ` ' ~ , \~..1 , I
r~
.
cxeawc scAcF
\ ti ,
. _ ~
,
j ~ / • e \ -
_
Beay Creth 9t6'Fh4yj
! .`wF r, . Tj .I 4 f \ ~ ~ ` ~ f I
V
, , , • - ~ \ ~ ~ ./`i ~
i ; t T , `?i' j r ~ ; - _ - _ _
' \ ~ t ^ ~.a '
Y i ' r,~i ~ . _ ~ O i i e~.~ ~ ^ ^J y~_ . ~..t~ . .
I F~ 1~'S _ ~.~',l~' 'l-w.6~ ,3,%~/• - i/~.~! ~ ~ ~ I
~ 1~.. ' ~ ` ' i ~ ~ \ . . ~•s? y~,..~r r
~ ' c4?. K p\ ~l--~' ~ ~ ~ - \ ~ - j.~"~ ' TY~~ _ ~~--_'~-,r~ ~ % ~
-
,
Y
. fViIiVUTES
~ VAIL TOWRI COUIVCIL fVlEETING
March 4, 1997
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, March 4, 1997, in the Council Chambers of the
Vail Nfunicipal Buiiding. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:30 P.M.
MEfViBERS PRESEiVT: Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-tem
Kevin Foley
Rob Ford
. . Michael Jewett
Paul Johnston , Ludwig Kurz
MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert W. Armour, Mayor
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESERIT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Tom N{oorhead, Tovun Attorney
Holly IVIcCutcheon, Towrn Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation.
Assistant Town Manager, Pam Brandmeyer presented Proclamation No. 1, Series of 1997 declaring fViarch 11, 1997
Be Your Best Day, and introduced Troop Leader Ginny Snowdon who was accompanied by Brownies and Girl Scouts
from lacal troops 147 and 163. The Council was asked to honor the tradition of Be Your Best Day. Chelsea
Donaldson, a local Brownie then read a brief statement and offered suggestions to "be our best." Mayor Pro-Tem
Sybill iVavas read the proclamation in full and presented each girl with an originally executed document showing the
Town's support.
Next, Sue Dugan updated Council members on discussions held among individuals involved in a Vail Tomorrow focus
group regarding the Town's Design Review process. She said the group was interested in restating processes and
requirements of individuals senring on the board. Alls. Dugan shared an example of a process in which she felt an
inconsistency had occurred, and urged Council to review DRB procedures. Sybill IVavas reminded those present of
vacancies which. existed on the DRB and three other town boards, and encouraged the public to send in their letters
of interest. Council will interview applicants at a work session on March 25.
Item number two on the agenda was the Consent Agenda which consisted of the following items:
A. Approval of the Minutes from the meetings of February 4 and 18, 1997.
B. Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1997, second reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of Fee Title
to the Following Lands in Colorado:
Sixth Principal Meridian
T. 5 S.. R. 81 W.
Sec. 11, that portion of the NE1/4SE1/4 lying northerly of the northerly boundary lines of Vail Heights Filing Rlo. 1, according to the Plan recorded June 25, 1969, in Book 215 at Page 438 and Resubdivision of Buffer Creek according
to the Plan recorded October 8, 1993 at Reception #98077; and
that portion of the SW1l4SE1/4 lying northerly and westerly of the north and west boundary of Vail Das Schone -
Filing No. 2, according to the Plan recorded as Reception No. 110984 EXCEPT the following parcel:
Beginning at the northv?rest corner of Lot 10 of Vail Das Schone Filing No. 2; thence N 02 degrees 10 seconds E
348.85 feet; thence S 88 degrees 08 minutes E 70.00 feet; thence S 47 degrees 52 minutes 03 seconds E 181.47
feet to a point being the northeast corner of said subdivision Lot 10; thence along the north line of said Lot 20, S 59
degrees 36 minutes 06 seconds W 246.47 feet to the point of beginning; and
LESS AND EXCEPT a 1.29 acres parcel to be donated by Landowner;
Sec. 14, Lots 16, 19, and 21.
Containing an aggregate of 76.30 acres, more or less, in Eagle County.
To the United States of America.
Rob Ford moved to approve the Consent Agenda with a second from Paul Johnston. Kevin Foley requested the
items on the Consent Agenda be considered separately, and then moved to approve the minutes of the February
4 and 18, 1997 meetings. Rob Ford seconded the motion. Sybill Navas explained the March 4 minutes had been
revised due to a vote that had been recorded wrong. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 6-0.
Rob Ford then moved to approve Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1997 on second reading, with a second from Ludwig.
Kevin Foley said that because he was absent during the first reading of the ordinance having missed the
presentation, he would be voting against it. He felt that the Trappers parcel should remain open space, and that
money should be recouped from Rockledge Road property owners to acquire that parcel.
A vote was taken and passed 5-1, Kevin Foley voting in opposition.
1 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes March 4, 1997
ThaPdl on the agenda was Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1997, first reading, an ordinance establishing Special
Development District No. 35, Austria Haus, and providing for a development plan and its contents; development
standards; and other provisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto. .
Mayor Pro-Tem, Sybill Rlavas, read the title in full. Mike Jewett moved to table Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1997, to
the March 25 meeting. 6Cevin Foley seconded the motion. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 6-0.
Foaarth on the agenda vvas Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1997, first reading of an ordinance repealing and reenacting
Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1993; An ordinance amending Special Development District No. 29 and providing for
a development plan and its contents; permitted, conditional and accessory uses; development standards, recreation
amenities tax, and other special provisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Sybill iVavas read the title in full. Town of Vail project planner Lauren Waterton presented the item, and a re"vised
ordinance which included an additional condition. She explained that the request was for a major amendment to SDD
#29 (The Valley, Phase II) to allow for modifications to the previously approved development plan for Tract A(upper
development) located at 1502 Buffehr Creek Road. The applicants, Harold and Barbara Brooks were represented
by Steve Isom. The following background was provided: The applicant is requesting a major SDD amendment to
modify the approved development plan for Tract A, of Special Development District #29 (The Valley, Phase II). The
property is located at 1502 Buffehr Creek Road, Tracts A-1, A-2, and B-2, Parcel 2, Lions Ridge 2nd Filing.
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1997, implements the revisions to this SDD.
The following summarizes the request:
0 The applicant is requesting to modify the existing platted building envelopes on Tracts A-1 and A-2, to create
one building envelope and combine the two tracts into one lot.
0 The PEC recommended approval of the request subject to 3 conditions, details of which were contained in
the memo.
~ The remainder of the plan remains unchanged from the 1993 approval.
Staff recommendation was for approval of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1997, on first reading.
Rob Ford inquired as to why an SDD was being used, and Lauren explained that when the project vvas originally
annexed in from the County it had county approval for a development plan. She explained that when it was annexed
into the Town, there was no zoning that matched the development plan, and therefore, the development plan could
be incorporated into the Town using the SDD.
Sybill suggested adding a condition that an existing driveway cut be used to minimize impacts. Paul Johnston moved
for approval of Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1997 on first reading with the condition suggested by Sybill. Kevin Foley
seconded the motion. During discussion, Sybill expressed her desire to require bear proof trash containers for new
development projects. A vote was fhen taken and passed unanimously, 6-0.
Agenda item number five was Resolution No. 5, Series of 1997, a Resolution determining the necessity of, and
authorizing the acquisition of, an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned by the FirstBank of Vail, a
Colorado banking corporation by either negotiation or condemnation for town public purposes. Town Attorney Tom
Moorhead and Public Works Director Larry Grafel presented the item.
Larry Grafel explained that the following seven resolutions were for the purpose of acquiring temporary construction
and some permanent easements in conjunction with the West Vail Roundabout construction project,
Sybill Navas read the title in full, and Larry explained Resolution 5 was for the purpose of obtaining a temporary
construction of 831 square feet for street and sidewalk use on land owned by FirstBank. Rob moved to approve
Resolution No. 5, Series of 1997, and Ludwig seconded the motion. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously,
6-0.
Sox4h on the agenda was Resolution No. 6, Series of 1997, a Resolution determining the necessity of, and authorizing
the acquisition of, an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned by West Vail Mall Corp. by either
negotiation or condemnation for town public purposes. Sybill read the title in full, and Larry explained the resolution
was for the purpose of obtaining a temporary construction easement of approximately 698 sq. ft. Rob moved to
approve the resolution with a second from Ludwig. A vote taken was passed unanimously, 6-0.
Agenda item number seven was Resolution No. 7, Series of 1997, a Resolution determining the necessity of, and
authorizing the acquisition of, an easement for street and sidewalk use on land owned by McDonald's Corporation,
a Colorado Corporation by either negotiation or condemnation for town public purposes. Sybill Navas read the title
in full. Larry noted the purpose of the resolution was also for obtaining a temporary construction easement of 843
sq. ft., and an additional 174 sq. ft. Rob made a motion to approve Resolution No. 7, Series of 1997, and Ludwig
seconded the motion. A vote taken was passed unanimously, 6-0.
The eighth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 8, Series of 1997, a Resolution determining the necessity of, and
authorizing the acquisition of, easements for street and sidewalk use on land owned by Highland PUD by either
negotiation or condemnation for town public purposes. Sybill read the title in full and Larry explained that the purpose
for the resolution was to obtain a temporary construction easement of 30,436 sq. ft., and a permanent acquisition
2 Vail Toun Council Evening Meeting Minutes March 4, 1997
of two parcels, one being 3,034 sq. feet and the other for 4,018 sq. feet, on property owned by the Streamside in
0 order to reconstruct the bridge. Rob moved to approve the resolution and Ludwig seconded the motion. A vote vvas
taken and passed unanimously, 6-0.
Ninth on the agenda vvas Resolution No. 9, Series of 1997, a Resolution determining the necessity of, and
authorizing the acquisition of, easements for street and sidewalk use on land owned by West Vail Associates, Ltd.
by either negotiation or condemnation for town public purposes. Sybill read the title in full. Larry stated the purpose
for the resolution was to obtain 10,157 sq. ft. temporary construction easement, and a permanent acquisition of 323
sq. ft. at the Texaco gas station. Rob moved to approve the resolution, and Ludwig seconded the motion. During
discussion, Town Engineer Greg Hall explained what procedures would be taking place at the site. A vote was then
taken which passed unanimously, 6-0.
_ Agenda item number gen was 'Resolution No. 10, Series of 1997, a Resolution determining the necessity of,, and
authorizing the acquisition of, easements for street and sidewalk use on land owned by Reaut Corporation by either -
. negotiation or condemnation for town public purposes. Sybill read the title in full. Larry informed Council the property
was a 4,393 sq. ft. temporary construction easement and a permanent acquisition of 210 sq. ft. at the West Vail
Lodge. Rob made a motion to approve Resolution No. 10, Series of 1997. Ludwig seconded the motion and a vote
was taken and passed unanimously, 6-0.
Eleventh on the agenda was Resolution No. 11, Series of 1997, a Resolution determining the necessity of, and
authorizing the acquisition of, easements for street and sidewalk use on land owned by Vail City Corp. by either
negotiation or condemnation for town public purposes. Sybill read the title in full. Larry stated the purpose for the
resolution was for the Phillips 66 corner consisting of a 5,979 sq. ft. temporary construction easement, and a
permanent acquisition of 156 square feet. Rob moved to approve Resolution No. 11, Series of 1997, with a second
by Ludwig. A vote was taken which passed unanimously, 6-0.
Larry stated that the town was currently in negotiation with property owners, and staff was optimistic a reasonable
agreement could be reached in obtaining easements and acquisitions.
Agenda item number twelve was an update on the status of the Lionshead Redevelopment IVlaster Plan. Director
of Community Development Susan Connelly presented an update of the Stage 1 Data Collection and Site Analysis,
and Introduction to Stage 2 of the Program. Ethan Moore from Design Workshop was also present. Council was then
asked to approve or modify:
(1) "Framework for prioritization of wish list items"
' (2) Wish list submittal-form, and
(3) Stage 2 schedule of activities and decisions points.
The staff recommendation was that Council approve the three items listed above.
Responding to a concept proposed earlier by Vail Associates for a hotel to be built on the west side of the Lionshead
parking structure, Lucien Layne, a Vantage Point property owner, suggested Council add a seventh policy objective
that would protect existing properties from massive, tall or imposing buildings that might be proposed for Lionshead
redevelopment. He said the town's policy objective for a"strong economic base through increased live beds," was an open road map for "people to do whatever they want." Susan Connelly responded, stating that at this stage of
the process, ideas were very general and wide open as far as design. During stage two, she said, the community
would be asked to think big, without pinning down specific locations, and during step three, the process would
become more specific and defined as decisions are made and priorities reached.
Sybill said the objective of the master plan is to provide a roadmap to give direction for the Lionshead redevelopment,
something she hoped the community as a whole would feel comfortable with as an end result.
Next, Vail resident Bill Wilto, requested Council add an objective to increase the employee housing bed base in
Lionshead. Susan stated the intention was that there would be, at a minimum, no net loss of the current employee
bed base.
Ginny Culp then expressed concerns about unmitigated growth and the need for more live beds in Vail.
Kevin Foley said public forums on the issue had been well attended and encouraged all to participate and become
involved.
Rob then moved to approve the schedule and framework for prioritization of wish list items, wish list submittal form,
and the stage two schedule of activities and decisions points. Mike Jewett seconded the motion and a vote was then
taken which passed unanimously, 6-0.
Item number thsrteen was an appeal of a variance approval (4-2; Moffet and Pratt opposed, Aasland absent) made
by the Planning and Environmental Commission on February 10, 1997. The applicant was granted a front setback
variance of 6- 6" to allow an additional one-car garage to be constructed at 1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6,
Vail Village 7th Filing. Town of Vail Planner Dirk Mason presented the item. The appellant, Diana Donovan, was also
present. At the request of the applicant, Paul moved to table the item to the April 1 evening meeting. Rob seconded
• 3 Vait Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes March 4, 1997
the motion and a vote was taken which passed unanimously, 6-0.
d Next was a report from the Town Manager. Bob McLaurin reported on the progress of the new HTE computer system
installed for the Police and Finance Departments.
Sybill reminded the audience that the March 18 meeting had been moved to March 25 to allow council members to
attend a legislative session in Denver.
Sybill then sent Council's best wishes to Mayor Bob Armour, who was recuperating from knee surgery.
Kevin thanked the National Brotherhood of Skiers for organizing a great summit in Vail.
There being no further business, a motion was made by Rob and seconded by Kevin to adjourn. The meeting was
adjourned at approximately 8:40 p.m. -
Respectfully submitted,
Sybill iVavas, Mayor Pro-tem
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Holly McCutcheon
(*Names of certain individuals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
4 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes March 4, 1997
, NiINUTES
. VAIL TOW(V COUNCIL MEETIIVG
March 25, 1997
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, March 25, 1997, in the Council Chambers of the
Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESEiVT: Robert W. Armour, Mayor .
Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-tem
Kevin Foley
Rob Ford
Michael Jewett
Paul Johnston
Ludwig Kurz
MEMBERS ABSEfVT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESEfVT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation.
Bill Wilto of Vail suggested the Town lobby Congress to enact legislation to address the issue of mining claims. Wilto
said the current regulations, which have been in place for years, threaten communities like Vail.
IVext, Vail resident, Sue Dugan, suggested the need for more animal control officers and possibly a tightened leash
law due to problems with dogs running at large in her neighborhood.
Seconc9 on the agenda was Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1997, second reading of an ordinance repealing and
reenacting Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1993; An ordinance amending Special Development District No. 29 and
providing for a development plan and its contents; permitted, conditional and accessory uses; development
standards, recreation amenities tax, and other special provisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Mayor Armour read the title in full. Town of Vail project planner Lauren Waterton presented the item, explaining that
the request was for a major amendment to SDD #29 (The Valley, Phase II) to allow for modifications to the previously
approved development plan for Tract A(upper development) located at 1502 Buffehr Creek Road. The applicants,
Harold and Barbara Brooks were represented by Steve tsom. The following background was provided: The applicant
is requesting a major SDD amendment to modify the approved development plan for Tract A, of Special Development
District #29 (The Valley, Phase II). The property is located at 1502 Buffehr Creek Road, Tracts A-1, A-2, and B-2,
Parcel 2, Lions Ridge 2nd Filing. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1997, implements the revisions to this SDD.
Staff recommendation was for approval of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1997, on first reading.
Sybill Navas moved for approval of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1997, on second reading with a second from Ludwig
Kurz. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
Agenda item number three was Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1997, first reading, an ordinance establishing Special
Development District (SDD) IVo. 35, Austria Haus, and providing for a development plan and its contents; .
development standards; and other provisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Town of Vail project planner,
George Ruther, presented the item and explained the request in detail. Memorandums prepared by the Community
Development Department staff dated March 4, 1997, to Council and the memorandum dated February 24, 1997, to
the PEC recommending a conditional approval (6-0-1) of the applicant's request for the establishment of SDD no.
35, Austria Haus, located at 242 East Meadow Drive on a part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village 1 st Filing, were also
reviewed. The staff recommendation was for approval of Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1997 on first reading.
The proposal included 22 member-owned fractional fee club units with 27 lock-off units, plus 26 hotel rooms, an on-
site manager's residence, and 4,440 square feet of new commercial retail space. In exchange for increased density
on the site, the applicant (Sonnenalp Properties, Inc.) proposed six public benefits to meet the Special Development
District criteria. Those benefits are: an increase in the annual occupancy of the Austria Haus by approximately four
times; the addition of approximately 4,000 square feet of sales tax-generating retail space; implementation of the
recommended streetscape master plan improvements to East Meadow Drive; completion of the commercial loop in
the Village via the construction of a well-lit, heated pedestrian walkway; removal of 25 surface parking spaces and
the construction of an underground parking structure; and landscape improvements to Slifer Plaza, East Meadow
Drive and the Gore Creek streambank.
During a presentation by architect Gordon Pierce, representing the applicant, Sonnenalp Properties, Pierce recalled
how the project has changed over time to adjust to community concerns. Those changes include:
a reduction in fractional fee club units from 32 to 22; an increase in hotel rooms from 0 to 26; the addition of 27 lock-
1 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes March 25, 1997
, off rooms; 10,000 sq. ft. of commercial space reduced to 4,500; exclusion of a restaurant; redesigned entryway;
, addition of heated sidewalks; $100,000 for streambank improvements; careful attention to trash removal; change in •
roof elevation; and adjustment in the number of cars parked on-site. Pierce said the changes had been hammered
° out following 15 town board meetings, 35 meetings with town staff and numerous meetings with the neighborhood.
He said he wanted the Council to understand his partners had been listening to the concerns and have,responded
appropriately. Yet, he said, he still senses that some members of the community are opposed to the project. With
that in mind, he presented a new rendering showing five building facades much like the scale of Bridge Street as an
alternative design.
Public input was heard, pro and con, was heard from the following community members: Pete Seibert, Amy Cassidy,
Rick Rosen, Bob Lazier, Jan Strauch, Sue Dugan, Rob Levine, Mike Standard, and Joe Staufer, Tom Steinberg, Tony
Hitelsen, Ginny Culp, Bill Wilto, Carol Allman, Charlie Langmaid, Ken Wilson, Flo Steinberg, Dan Tellen, Peter Rudy,
and Jim Lamont.
Discussion continued with comments from the following Council members:
0 Paul Johnston said although the project seemed extreme to him at first, he was ready to move forward to find
a way to make the project work. He said if the town is indeed serious about increasing the number and quality
of accommodation units, it would have to struggle and fight hard to get these new upscale projects "whenever
and however we can."
0 Kevin Foley said he favored "tweaking" the project by scaling down the size and putting more emphasis on
parking and delivery. Kevin also expressed concern about the lack of a restaurant in the facility.
0 Michael Jewett said he could support the project because it reflected his redevelopment election campaign platform, and asked that those who have called him to complain about the size of the building be more
specific in suggesting how much smaller it should be to meet their satisfaction.
0 Sybill iVavas had mixed feelings about the project, and said she was concerned about setting a precedent for
future projects in Lionshead, the loss of sunshine in the area due to the height of the building, and streamside
protections, among other concerns. She called it a good plan, but not the final plan.
0 Rob Ford said he liked the building's design but felt it was too big for the site. He criticized use of the SDD
process saying it gives too much latitude to the staff and the PEC. He said he was troubled that the request
exceeds all aspects of the underlying zone district and that the SDD tool had failed. Although he said he
remains committed to redevelopment on the site, he didn't want to see "uncontrolled growth."
0 Ludwig Kurz said he couldn't support the proposal as presented without additional conditions similar to those
carried in the motion for approval. Kurz also suggested the need for redevelopment incentives and wondered
how the town might provide them.
0 Bob Armour advocated adjusting the project to meet the Council's satisfaction (rather than losing the project),
and suggested taking a look at the lock-off units as a possible way to reduce the size of the building.
Other issues mentioned by Council members included:
0 Reconsider the restriction on restaurant use in the building.
0 Increase the stream setback distance along the south side of the building to provide further protection of Gore
Creek.
0 Explore removing several lock off units with the intent of reducing the overall square footage of the building.
0 Remove the clock tower from the building.
0 Increase the ratio of accommodation units to fractional fee units.
A motion was made by Paul Johnston to approve Ordinance IVo. 4, Series of 1997 on first reading with the following
conditions:
0 Require 16 additional parking spaces to be placed on-site (possibly on underground land leased from the
Town of Vail) rather than paying into the parking pay-in-lieu fund.
0 Convert two streamside dwelling units to accommodation units.
0 Heat the bus lane in front of the building.
0 Applicant will agree not to remonstrate against a streamwalk alongside the property if the town chooses to
expand the streamwalk.
0 Create 11 new employee housing units rather than deed restrict 11 exitinp units.
0 Applicant returns to the Planning and Environmental Commission prior to second reading for consideration
of a new ridge line design to reduce the height of the building.
0 Applicant presents a plan prior to second reading on guest circulation, and loading and delivery issues.
Mike Jewett seconded the motion, and a vote was then taken which passed, 5-2, Mayor Armour and Rob Ford voting
in opposition.
Four4h on the agenda was Resolution No. 12, Series of 1997, a Resolution to Establish a 457 Deferred
Compensation Plan for the Fire Fighters and Police Officers of the Town of Vail. Town Attorney, Tom Moorhead
explained the item in detail. Paul moved to approve Resolution No. 12, Series of 1997, with a second from Ludwig.
A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
2 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes March 25, 1997
, The Fifth item on the agenda was an update of the Ford Park Management Plan. Town of Vail staff members
. presenting the item included Larry Grafel, Pam Brandmeyer, Todd Oppenheimer, and George Ruther. The Council
was asked to approve the final draft of the Ford Park Management Plan so that a resolution could be prepared for
' consideration at the April 1 evening meeting.
Comments from the public included:
Ross Davis of the Vail Recreation District Board of Directors requested that the wording of the parking policy be
changed to require a public election for construction and financing of a parking structure. Mr. Davis also said he
objected to a plan to re{ocate a tennis court at a cost to the public of $100,000.
Hermann Staufer, also of the Vail Recreation District, and his brother Joe agreed with Davis, and asked that the
parking policy either be eliminated completely or require a public vote.
Councilmember Michael Jewett then asked if an initiative could be created similar to the charter amendment on open
space that would preserve a public vote on the parking issue in perpetuity. Town Attorney Tom Moorhead said he •
would need to research the matter.
Councilmember Sybill iVavas suggested removing the word "community" from community parking to help ease the
concern.
Following additional suggestions from community members Bart Cuomo, Ken Wilson, Sammye Meadows and Tom
Steinberg, the Council agreed to continue working to modify wording of the parking policy to satisfy the future needs
of the proposed Vail Alpine Gardens Educational Center and mitigate concerns raised by other community members.
Also, at the request of Jim Lamont of the East Village Homeowners Association, a proposal to hold
monitoring/assessment meetings for leaseholders and neighborhood representatives was added to the plan. The
draft will be reviewed again at the April 1 work session in preparation for final approval at the evening meeting on April
1, 1997.
Agenda item number sBx was the appointment of three Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) members.
Paul moued to appoint Ann Bishop, Greg Moffet, and John Schofield to serve two year terms on the PEC, and Rob
seconded the motion. A vote was then taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
iVext was item number seven, the appointment of two Design Review Board (DRB) members. Paul moved to appoint
Brent Alm and Bill Pierce to serve two year terms on the DRB. Rob seconded the motion and a vote was taken which
passed unanimously, 7-0.
There being no further business, a motion was made to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:00
a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
Minutes prepared by Holly McCutcheon
(*Names of certain individuals who 9ave public input may be inaccurate.) •
3 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes March 25, 1997
ORDINAidCE NO. 7
Series of 9997
AN ORDINANCE AAAENDIAIG SECTIOtd 95-02-030(C) OF THE f1NUNICIPAL CODE OF THE
TO1IVN OF bA1L TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF Aid AIdNUAL ELEVATOR
INSPECTIOfd FEE.
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council believes it would be a benefit to the health, safety,
and welfare of the citizens and visitors to Vail to continue to provide commercial inspection of
_ • elevators, commercial dumbwaiters; and platform lifts; and
' WHEREAS, in order to provide for the appropriate cost of such inspections the Vail
Town Council wishes to adopt the Northwest Colorado Council of Govemments new elevator
permit fees schedule; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail believes it is necessary to continue to provide for the
assessment of a will call inspection fee in the amount of $3.00 per permit to pay for inspection
call services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1.
(1) Section 15-02-030(C) of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby
amended to provide for annual elevator, escalator, moving walkway, commercial dumbwaiter,
and platform lift inspection fees in the amounts as set forth in the attached Northwest Colorado
Council of Governments elevator permit fee schedule which is hereby adopted by the Town
Council and shall be set forth on the schedule of fees maintained in the building division of the
Community Development Department.
- (2) The schedule of fees will continue to include a will call inspection fee in the
amount of $3.00 per permit to pay for inspection call services.
(3) Future changes in fees will be considered for adoption by Resolution.
Section 2.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason
held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and
each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
invalid.
1
e ion 3. The Town Council_hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and
proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 4.
The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall
not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to
the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as .
commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision .
hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded
unless expressly stated herein.
Section 5
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE IN FULL, this 1st day of April, 1997. A pubfic hearing on this ordinance shall be held at
the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, on the 15th day of April,
1997, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Robert W. Armour, Mayor
• ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THIS 15th DAY OF APRIL, 1997.
" Robert W. Armour, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
c:Wrd97.7
2
q .
CCOG
f NTV Y ELE7 6 8TOR PERNflT FEES - •
O$ Q~~< r V 15.9 o Ji O •
TABLE .3-F EL~ATOR P , is affieuded ts rmd as follows: .
1~Ye~r Iaa~II~tio~,s
1. Passenger or trdghg eIevator, escalator9 ffioviag walk
_
Up to aaci iacluding S50,000.00 of valuation .........e ...........................................$350.00
Over $50,000.00 of va]uatioa $3 50.00 plus S6.00 far each 51,000a00
ar fraction t==f ove,P $50,004.00
ge Daaffibwaite~ private Pesidence ekimtor
Up to and iacluding S24,000.00 of valuatioa .....e ..................._._.~_...._._.............$ZSOo00
Over $20,000.00 of %mluation _ S250.00 pltas S3.00 for e.ach $ 1,000.00
oY fiwdcn thereof ove.P S24,000.00
iMajor Altemtimns
Fees for majar alterations shmil be as set forth ia table 3mA. buta1lativai fees include charges for
equiPmcng on th,e cenveyancce side of the discoanect switch.
Otheg Iaaspestaons and Fees:
1. Insspectians outside of normai busiaess hours, per hour ...........................e..S50.000
(miaianum charge-two houas)
2. Rsinspection f6es assessed under provisians of Scction 305.8,
per iaspectioa ..o................................................ $50.000
~ 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, gtr houx S50.00~
(minimum Charge-pne-haIf hotaT) ~
4. Addieional plan review gecuired by eharige,, addidons or Peaisions
to plaas for which an initia] review bas been completed................................................550.004,
(miniazum chargg--oae-half hotar)
#Or the 2ata1 hourly cost to the juisdiction, whichever is greatest. 'rhi.s cast sbn11 include
supervision, odcrh=d, equigment, hourly wages aed $iage benefits of the employees andolved.
y .
0
ORDINP'iNCG Itlo. 8 . .
SePies of 1997
AN ORDBNAIVCE ESTABLYSH9NG A TFaAFFIC OFFENSE FOR FABLURE TO PROVIDE A
COMPLVINC POLICI( OR CERT9FICATE OF SELF-91VSUR4NCE.
WHEREAS, the. Vail Town Council is acutely aware of the toll in human suffering and - loss of life, limb, and property caused by negligence.in the operation of motor vehicles within . the State of Colorado and the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, it is recognized that this basic problem can be and is being dealt with by
direct measures designed to protect our people from the ravages of irresponsible drivers, the
Town Council is also very much concerned with the financial loss visited upon innocent traffic
accident victims by negligent motorists who are financially irresponsible; and
WHEREAS, in prescribing the sanctions and requirements of this ordinance, it is the
policy of the Town of Vail to induce and encourage all motorists to provide for their financial
responsibility for the protection of others.
iVOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIIVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. _
(1) No owner of a motor vehicle required to be registered in this state shall operate
the vehicle or permit it to be operated on the public highways of the Town of Vail when the
owner has failed to have a complying policy or certificate of self-insurance in full force and
effect as required by sections 10-4-705 and 10-4-716, C.R.S.
(2) No person shall operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of the Town of
Vail vuithout a complying policy or certificate of self-insurance in full force and effect as required
by sections 10-4-705 and 10-4-716, C.R.S.
(3) When an accident occurs, or when requested to do so following any lawful traffic
contact or during any traffic investigation by a peace officer, no owner or operator of a motor
vehicle shall fail to present to the requesting officer immediate evidence of a complying policy or
certificate of self-insurance in full force and effect as required by sections 10-4-705 and 10-4-
- 716, C.R.S.
(4) Any person who violates the provisions of subsection (1), (2), or (3) of this
section commits a traffic offense.
1
' ' ~ . . _ R,h
i
(5) Testimony of the failure of any owner or operator of a motor vehicle to present
immediate evidence of a complying policy or certificate of self-insurance in full force and effect
as required by sections 10-4-705 and 10-4-716, C.R.S., when requested to do so by a peace
officer, shall constitute prima facie evidence, at a trial concerning a violation charged under
- subsection (1) or (2) of this section, that such owner or operator of a motor vehicle violated .
. subsection (1) or (2) of this section.
(6) No person charged with violating subsection (1), (2), or (3) of this section shall
be convicted if he produces in court a bona fide complying policy or certificate of self-insurance
which was in full force and effect, as required by sections 10-4-705 and 10-4-716, C.R.S., at the
time of the alleged violation. Section 2.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason
held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and
each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
invalid. .
Section 3.
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 4.
The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall
not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to
the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as
commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision
hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded
unless expressly stated herein.
Section 5.
- All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
2
e
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE IRI FULL, this 1 st day of April, 1997. A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at
the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, on the 15th day of April,
1997, in the fViunicipal Building of the Town.
Robert W. Armour; Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Tovvn Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AIVD EfVACTED OfV SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE OiVLY) THIS 15th DAY OF APRIL, 1997.
Robert W. Armour, IVlayor
ATTEST:
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
c:\ord97.8
Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1997 3 '
P
~
mEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: April 1, 1997
SUBJECT: Review of existing GRFA Policy and alternatives
Staff: Russell Forrest V. PV3RPOSE:
The purpose of this worksession is to revievu the analysis for three alternatives to the existing
GRFA regulations for single family, duplex, and primary/secondary type structures. This memo
will describe: how to implement each of these alternatives; what homes might look like under
each alternative; and will identify considerations that would need to be evaluated for each
alternative. On March 10th, the PEC, in a 4-3 vote, recommended alternative 1 with several
conditions. At the April 1st Council worksession, staff will review the alternatives along with the
recommendations from the PEC and staff. At the evening meeting on April 15th, staff would like
to ask for Council's preferred alternative. Once Council decides on a preferred alternative staff
will begin the implementation process. This could include additional research to answer
questions relating to the preferred action and would include developing proposed code revisions.
fl. PROBLEIIR STATEwAEPIT & GIVENS:
The Vail Town Council directed staff to evaluate the existing GRFA system and determine
whether this is an effective and appropriate tool when compared to other alternatives. Three
reoccurring issues have been raised by the Town Council which include:
A) Is_GRFA an effective tool in controlling mass and bulk;
B) Is it appropriate that the Town should be reviewing interior floor space; and
C) Is it an effective use of staff time (both TOV and designers/builders)?
The givens for this process include:
A) The Vail Town Council will make the final decision with input from the community and
recommendations from the PEC and staff.
B) There will be some form of regulatory control of size and mass.
C) This process will only address residential development (single-family, duplex, and
primary/secondary type structures).
D) "fVo action" (i.e. keeping the existing GRFA system) is a viable alternative.
E) Homes should not get significantly larger in size.
F) IVew design guidelines should not inhibit design creativity.
1
,
~
III. BACKGROUND
In October of 1996, Tom Braun, the planning consultant for this project, prepared a paper which
addressed the following :
' Reoccurring concerns/issues with the existing system,
* Objectives of having mass and bulk controls,
' Mechanisms for controlling bulk and mass,
` History of GRFA in Vail,
* Analysis of how seven other resort communities control bulk and mass, and
* Analysis of five alternatives to the Town of Vail's GRFA system.
At the public meetings on October 30th and 31 st in 1996, Tom Braun presented the findings in
the background paper. A majority of the time at the meeting was spent obtaining input from the
public on the existing system, discussing pros and cons of alternatives, and identifying new
alternatives. Approximately 45 people attended these meetings.
The PEC reviewed this analysis on November 11, 1996. Four members felt that alternative three
(eliminating GRFA) was the best alternative with certain conditions. These members felt that if
GRFA was eliminated, additional design guidelines would be needed. One commissioner that
supported alternative three, felt that at least two architects should sit on the Design Review
Board.
The other three members of the PEC felt that some form of GRFA is needed. One member felt
strongly that GRFA does effectively control bulk and mass and eliminating the system would
increase the size of structures in the Town of Vail. The other two members were interested in
pursuing alternatives 2 and 4(allow interior modifications and eliminate basement space in
GRFA calculations, respectively). Overall, there seemed to be a consensus on the Commission
that homeowners, particularly owner occupied homes, should be able to do interior remodels
without GRFA being an issue. Council reviewed the analysis on November 26th and directed
staff to examine the following alternatives (not listed by prioriry/preference) in more detail:
* Allow interior modifications to exceed the maximum GRFA allowance for existing
structures, provided such additions do not add to the bulk and mass of the home.
' Amend the definition of GRFA to_exclude basement space from calculation as GRFA.
. * Eliminate the use of GRFA for controlling mass and bulk for single family, duplex, and
primary/secondary rype structures.
The Vail Town Council was very clear that any alternative to the existing GRFA system should
not significantly increase bulk and mass. The Council was also very sensitive to any
recommendation that might inhibit creative design solutions. In addition, several Council
members were interested in exploring how vaulted space could be better addressed in the
Town's regulations. Attached is a revised analysis from Tom Braun of how each alternative
could be implemented and issues that would need to be considered prior to implementation.
2
P
V!/. PROCESS OVER!/@EW:
The process for this project is broken into three phases 1) identification of alternatives; 2)
analysis of alternatives; and 3) legislative review of the preferred alternative. The following are
specific steps in the process.
Phase I Identification of Alternatives
1) Background analysis of existing GRFA system and alternatives. September &
October, 1996
2) Public meetings to review pros and cons of existing GRFA system October 30th &
and alternatives. 31 st, 1996
3) Presentation to PEC and Town Council to review pros/cons and November 11 &
(PEC) public input. The purpose of these public meetings was to IVovember 26
determine if any of the alternatives could be eliminated. 1996
Phase II Analyze hovu to implement alternatives and identify the impacts of each alternative
4) Complete analysis of alternative approaches. December & January
1996/1997
5) PEC worksession to review 3 alternatives February 10, 1997
6) PEC hearing to recommend an alternative March 10, 1997
7) Council worksession flflarch 11, 1997
8) Evening Council meeting to decide on alternative April 1 st, 1997
if additional time is needed from the March 11th worksession
Phase III Legislative Reviewr of preferred alternative (assumes code modifications)
8) Staff prepares language to modify Town Code April, 1997
9) PEC: worksession to consider code revisions . Following dates to be
determined
10) PEC: public hearing
11) Town Council: worksession to review proposed revision to
the existing GRFA regulations
12) Town Council: first reading of an ordinance
13) Town Council: second reading of an ordinance
3
'
V CURRENT IMPACT OF GRFA AND SITE COVERAGE: A. Overview of GRFA and Site Coveraae
Gross Residential Floor Area and site coverage are tied to lot area through simple mathematical
formulas. GRFA determines how much floor area can exist in a home and site coverage controls
the size of the footprint of a building. Both are tools that control the size and mass of buildings,
along with height restrictions and design guidelines. Very simply, the bigger the lot, the more
GRFA and site coverage is allowed on the lot.
B. GRFA -
In reference to GRFA, there is a graduated formula for controlling floor area. For example, the
calculation for primary/secondary, duplex, and single-family type homes is the following:
Max GRFA (Floor Area) _ .25 x lot area between 0 sq ft and 15,000 sq ft.
+
.10 x lot area between 15,000 sq ft. and 30,000 sq. ft.
+
.05 x lot area over 30,000 sq ft.
Exam le: A 35,000 square foot lot would be entitled to 3.750 sq ft of GRFA for the 1 st 15,000
square feet of lot area + 1.500 sq ft. of GRFA for the lot area between 15,000 and 30,000
square feet + 250 sq. ft. for the last 5,000 feet of lot area; for a total of 5.500 square feet of
GRFA.
Credits: Each allowable dwelling unit on a lot also receives 425 sq. ft. of additional
square feet, up to 600 square feet for a garage, and potentially 500 sq. ft. for a Type II
EHU (per lot).
C. Site Coveraae
Site coverage is not graduated and is simply 20% of the total lot area. Therefore, the
potentiaf building footprint for a 35,000 sq. ft. lot is 7,000 square feet.
D. Lot Areas in Vail .
Since lot area directly affects GRFA and site coverage, staff reviewed lot sizes in Vail.
Staff reviewed 611 lots in sudivisions across the Town. Lot sizes range from several
thousand square feet to over a 100,000 square feet. The average lot size in Vail is
approximately 21,000 square feet based on lots that were reviewed. More than half the
lot sizes in this survey are between 10,000 and 25,000 square feet. Table 1 below
summarizes the frequency of lot sizes in the Town of Vail:
4
J
TABLE 9
LOT S@ZES IN THE TOVUIV OF !lA9L
Lo4 Area (square gee4) Percert8 To4al Number ira Range
0-5,000 2.93% 18
5,001-10,000 18.73% 115
10,001-15,000 25.24% 155
15,001-20,000 18.40% 113
20,001-25,000 12.54% 77
25,001-30,000 3.91 % 24
30,001-35,000 6.35% 39
35,001-40,000 3.26% 20
40,001 + 8.14% 50
Totals: 100 % 611
E. Impact of GRFA and Site Coverage
Staff reviewed how GRFA and site coverage work together and what wrould happen if one
or the other wrere eliminated. Staff calculated GRFA, with credits, and site coverage for
lots ranging from 8,000 sq ft to over 60,000 square feet. Figure 1 below displays the
effect of GRFA and site coverage. The dark solid line indicates existing GRFA with
credits. The "No GRFA" lines reflect the ranae of howr big a home could be if site
coverage and building height were the only limiting factors. The No GRFA (low) line
assumes that a developer would use 100% of the allowable site coverage for the 1 st floor
and the massing above the 1 st floor would be 50% of the site coverage (i.e the massing
on the first floor). The IVo GRFA (high) line assumes that a developer would use 100% of
the allowable site coverage for the 1 st floor and the massing above the 1 st floor would be
80% of the site coverage (i.e the massing on the first floor).
Based on this review of GRFA and site coverage it appears that site coverage is the more
limiting factor on lots smaller than 16,000 square feet. Once lot sizes exceed 20,000
square feet, then GRFA is clearly the controlling factor in terms of bulk and mass. If
GRFA were eliminated, a significantly larger home could be constructed on the larger lots
in Town. For example, a 40,000 square foot lot could have a 12,000 to 14,000 square
foot structure without GRFA. VVith GRFA, a building could only be as large as 7,800
square feet in size (with credits). Therefore, GRFA does control massing on larger lots in
the Town of Vail.
5
i/
Figure 1
Floor Aree Comparisfan
25,000
~
~
.
2o,aoo
~
• _
r ~
. , :
<
^ ; -
,
P 15,000
. ~
;
o .
~
` r.
a _
~
GRFA+Ged'ns
0 10,000
_ , , r Gf~'#tCtedts :
LL . . . : A. , :
, ; . ' . . . .
: i. . . : :
» : - • NO A (Law)
r 'i: : •r < '
No GRFA (Ff9h)
5'~ r f- ;
Y+'
: 4 4 .4
_ . .
0 < . . .
° ° ° ° ° °o o ° ° ° °
°o °o o °o °o °o $
000
000000000$ °o 0 o 0$ o 0$ o 0$$0~0$$ 8 8 o o
m o ci v cc ao o m in r, rn - c~ tn n o c~ ~ cn ao o c~ nco ao 0
~ N N N N N (7 M f7 0 V V d ~ N N 1n ln (D
Lot /lrea (sq RJ
VI. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES:
A. Alternative 1- Keep.GRFA and allow Interior Modifications: ' This alternative would keep the existing GRFA system but would allow existing homes to exceed
their maximum allowable GRFA if the proposed modification had no changes to the exterior of
the home. This alternative would address one of the major issues in this analysis of allowing
homebwners to-modify the interior of their home and utilize existing crawl spaces or vaulted
areas. The major considerations with Alternative 1 are:
1) If Alternative 1 applied to,homes built in the future, home builders could build a home
within the allowable GRFA, and .then after receiving a Certificate of Occupancy, they could completely redo the interior and exceed their GRFA limit. In other words, people
could design vaulted spaces in anticipation of creating additional floor area after a
Certificate of Occupancy was issued. Property owners could create larger vaulted areas
and thus a larger building mass, while planning to fill it in at a later time. Under this
scenario, staff questions whether GRFA stitl has value in controlling bulk and mass. If
Alternative 1 is considered to be the preferred alternative, then staff strongly recommends
that it only apply to homes built prior to the date of this change to the regulations.
6 .
D
2) Staff recommends that a home have no remaining GRFA before doing interior
modifications. In other uvords, if a property had 500 square feet of GRFA remaining, they
would have to first build that additional floor area (on the outside of the existing structure)
and then, at a later time, do an interior remodel to maximize livable area on the inside of
the existing structure and the addition.
3) Equity is an issue vuith this alternative by only applying it to homes built before a
certain date. Property owners of homes built in the future may desire to take advantage
of the same opportunity to use vaulted and crawl spaces for livable area.
B. Alternative 2- Do not include basement space as GRFA This alternative would amend the GRFA definition to exclude basement space. This alternative
would address one aspect of the problem statement relating to intrusiveness and the public value
of regulating the interior of a home. This alternative would allow a property owner to modify an
interior basement space and exceed their GRFA allowance. Considerations related to this
alternative include:
1) Many lots in Vail are steep and basements are very rarely completely underground and
usually have a walk-out. The only practical way to apply this alternative would be to
develop a calculation for determining what percent of a basement is below grade and is a
true basement.
2) Calculating % area that can be defined as basement space would further complicate
the GRFA system by increasing staff and applicant time to process an application: See
page 3 of the Braun paper for a proposed definition of basement.
3) This alternative wrould result in bigger homes. By excluding basement space you can
basically apply that GRFA above grade, which would increase the size of homes.
C. Alternative 3-Eliminate GRFA
This alternative would eliminate GRFA as a tool to controlling, bulk and mass for single family,
duplex, and primary/secondary homes. In its place, site coverage wrould need to be reduced on
large lots and stronger design guidelines would be required. This alternative uvould address the
- problem statement by eliminating the need for staff to regulate the floor area in the home. GRFA
does not prevent a property owner from building a"block-like" structure. Stronger design
guidelines are a better tool for controlling the appearance of buildings. However, it should be
noted that GRFA does control the overall mass of a home, particularly on larger lots. Specific
considerations related to alternative 3 include:
1) Site coverage would have to be modified for lots over 19,000 square feet to prevent
significantly larger homes. Figure 2 demonstrates that site coverage can be graduated
just like GRFA to control building sizes. The GRFA line is plotted and is identical to the .
line in Figure 1 above. The No GRFA lines reflect the potential building mass without
GRFA and using a site coverage allowance of:
20% for lot area between 0-19,000 square feet
+
5% for lot area between 19,000-40,000 square feet
+
4% for lot area above 40,000 square feet
7
f
Figure 2
Reduced Site Coverage
12,000
Nv C,E3FA €H~~~} ~
10,000
t~"R f A ~ redats
8,000
GRFA+Credits
Q - - - - -NO GRFA (Low)
0 6,000 GRFA (High) ,
- - NO
~ .>.A.:
_;•>:>:s;:::i:..-::._:;:;,:;;::.;:::.;::::;::;<.....<:::;>::.:::....;.;:::::;: ..:.::.:.......;:4,000
`
2,000
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GG N CO N N N M ` n O a ~ Y+ lo
Lot Area
2) Modifying the site coverage as shown above is possible but there is a greater range for
. the possible size of homes by relying exclusively on site coverage and height to control
building mass. However, this can be further controlled by stronger design guidelines.
3) New design guidelines and site coverage requirements would have to be in place
before this alternative could be implemented. This may include new height restrictions to
ensure off-sets in the roof line (i.e. like the 60/40 split in the Village)
4) Parking standards are currently connected to GRFA. New parking standards would
have to be created.
5) This alternative would require greater reliance on the Design Review Board. Staff
would recommend that a minimum of two members of the board be architects or
landscape architects.
_ 6) Many existing subdivisions (suchas Spraddle Creek) have recorded maximum GRFA
limits on the plat. The Town would have to recognize these limits and ensure that homes
did not exceed those limits or significantly reduce development rights.
7) Eliminating GRFA could also eliminate the current floor area incentive for creating an
EHU. This incentive could potentially be created using site coverage (credit) or some
other incentive.
8) Eliminating GRFA would help reduce the number of illegal conversions/remodels that
occur without a building permit.
D. No Action
Taking no action on this project is also an alternative. It does not address any of the
issues or concerns that have been raised in this process. It would maintain the exiting
system of controlling GRFA, site coverage, height, and design.
8
D
E. Summa,ry of Alternatives Table 2
Summar of Alternatives
Al4erna4ive Problem 1: Problem 2: Problem 3: Ground rule: Ground rule: BCey Issues:
Effectiveness Bn4rusideness Simplicity/ Do no4 increase Do not
in controlling of TOV Staff & siae hinder
mass and regula4ing Applican4 design
bulk in4erior Time creativity
space
Aftemative. GRFA does This Would be Could increase size Staff ' A) Equity: .1- not control alternative very unless it is applied recommends People will still
Keep design but it would provide complicated if only to homes built new design want to build in
GRFA but does control greater applieii to prior a certain date guidelines vaulted areas
allow mass of homes flexibility to use new homes. and would apply that will and crawl
interior on large bts. space inside a only to homes that provide better spaces in the
changes to Would see home. have maxed out criteria for the future.
exceed increase in size GRFA. DRB but does
GRFA limit if this aft. is not hinder B)Should this
applied to new design. be applied to
homes new homes?
Alternative Will increase Somewhat Would Would increase Same as Alt 1 can
2- Do not mass of addresses this increase building size by above. basically
count building above issue by not complexity pushing GRFA accomplish aft.
basement grade. regulating since base above grade. 2
space basement ment area
space would have to
be calculated
Alternative Site coverage, Does address Staff may Could increase Same as This
3-No design this issue. have to building size above alternatives
GRFA guidelines, and TOV would review design depending on how effectiveness
height controls only regulate criteria for site coverage is depends on
could more building permit DRB. modified. It is changing site
effectively issue inside a possible to control coverage,
control exterior home. mass with site design
appearance. coverage and guidelines, and
design controls the DRB's
effectiveness in
implementing
- the guidelines.
Vail is 90%
built out-is it
too late to
change?
No Action GRFA does Would not No change to No change Same as Most people
not control address this complexity or above like the way
design but it problem staff time homes look in
does control Vail
mass of homes
on large lots.
9
i
VII. STAFF RECOMMENDAT90N:
Staff recognizes that this is a very complex issue that involves looking at the original problems
public input, Council direction, and requires trying to forecast how developers and home builders
would react under different alternatives. During public meetings, the community said they
generally feel good about how homes look and staff would very much agree with that in most
cases. People generally feel that additional design guidelines are needed to improve
consistency in the decision making of the DRB. In addition, people felt that something should be
done to allow home owners to make reasonable modifications to the interior of their homes
without changing the exterior. The majority of the people participating in the public meetings felt
that GRFA should be eliminated and the Town should only regulate the exterior design and
massing of a home. However, there were many that felt the existing system worked effectively
and should not be changed at this late date in Vail's development.
Staff does feel that improved design guidelines as identified on pages 5 and 6 of Tom Braun's
attached paper would help improve consistency and equity within the decision making process
for the Design Review Board. Staff strongly recommends that these types of changes need to
be imp/emented regard/ess of which alrernative is chosen. Staff feels that adequate flexibility
can be provided in these types of guidelines so as to not hinder creative design, while providing
better criteria for the Design Review Board.
With respect to the alternatives, and which alternative most significantly addresses the problems
identified in this project, staff feels that alternative 3, eliminate GRFA, has the greatest value
(with several caveats):
A) Additional work is needed to determine how to best modify site coverage to prevent
homes from significantly increasing in size. Site coverage would have to be modified to
ensure that homes would not significantly increase in size.
B) Improved design guidelines (which might include new height restrictions) will be
needed to also ensure that building mass does not significantly increase. Staff would
assist DRB and review projects based on these criteria.
C) DRB should be comprised of at least 2 design professionals (i.e, architect,
landscape architect).
D) Parking requirements will have to be further examined.
E) Need to examine how to provide an incentive for creating employee housing units.
Alternative 3 places an emphasis on controlling the exterior of a home, which has a public value,
and moves the Town away from regulating the interior of a home. Alternative 1 would address
many of the issues raised in this project. However, it is not logical to apply alternative 1 to future
projects knowing that the interior spaces could be modified once a certificate of occupancy is
issued. If alternative 1 were chosen as the preferred alternative, then staff would recommend it
only apply to existing homes built before the date this regulation would go into effect. The major
concern staff has with alternative 1 is that there is the issue of equity with homes that would be
built in the future and owners wanting to fill in vaulted or crawl space after receiving a certificate
of occupancy.
10
D
1lB6U PEC RECOMb1AAENDAT90N:
Table 3 summarizes the members of the PEC's stated preferences for each alternative. The
numbers in Table 3 reflect how many PEC members voted for an alternative with respect to a
preference.
Table 3
PEC Peeferences
. 1 st 2nd 3rd 4th Unacceptable
Preference Preference Preference Preference
Alternative 1- Keep 3 2 2
GRFA & allow
interior
modifications.
Alternative 2- Don't 0 4 1 2
count basement
space as GRFA
Alternative 3- 4 1 2 Eliminate GRFA
Alternative 4 1 2
IVo Action
There was significant discussion regarding each of the alternatives in the context of choosing
preferences; 3 members had alternative 1 as their first choice and 4 members choose alternative
3 as their first preference. Two members of the PEC felt that Alternatives 1 and 2 are
unacceptable. The final motion, approved 4-3, was to recommend alternative 1 with the following
conditions:
° Apply to existing development and future development in order to address the equity
issue. -
* A volumetric multiplier would need to be developed and be app(ied to future
construction to prevent the creation of large vaulted spaces in new homes.
" Don't include basement space that is completely below grade in GRFA calculations
(This is basically Alternative 2). PEC acknowledged that Alternative 1 could achieve
many of the aspects of Alternative 2 and staff would need to look at this issue more
closely.
The members of the Planning Commission wrere supportive of implementing improved design
guideline regardless of wrhat al4ernative was finally selected.
ll
~
~
~ BA II/ BIRAUN ASSOCIIATIES. IlNC.
PLANf`JING and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANI)UNg
TO: Russ Forest
FRONI: Tom Braun
DATE: February 6, 1997 -
. RE: Phase II of GRFA Analysis
Attached you will find the Phase II GRFA Analysis which provides further analysis of the three
potential altematives to the current GRFA system. These three alternatives, as selected by the
Town Council, include 1) the conversion of interior space in homes that meet or exceed allowable GRFA, 2) the exclusion of basement space from calculation as GRFA, and 3) the elimination of
GRFA. The following information is provided for each of these alternatives: 1) Description of Alternative A brief description of the alternative is provided in this section.
2) Issues to be Addressed
This section highlights some of the pertinent comments and considerations raised by the
Council, Commission and public during previous discussions regarding GRFA.
3) Proposed Language
This section outlines how and where each alternative could be incorporated into the Town's
zoning code and presents preliminary language for implementing the alternative. This . should not be considered "final ordinance language". Rather, it is intended to provide the
Council, Planning Commission and communiry with a better understanding of how each
alternative could be implemented and additional issues that will need to be resolved during
the implementation phase of this process.
4) Issues to Consider
Outstanding issues and implications relative to each alternative are highlighted in this
section.
As we have discussed, the purpose of this phase in the GRFA Analysis is to further understand the
issues and implications relative to each potential alternative. It is important to understand that it is
not the intention of ttus phase to resolve all potential issues related to each alternative. Rather, this
report identifies outstanding issues that would need to be addressed during the third and final step
in this process. This report will hopefully provide the PEC and Town Council with the information
needed to identify a preferred alternative to the existing GRFA system.
Minturn Ironworks Building Phone - 970.827.5797
201 Main Street. 2nd Floor Fax - 970.8275507
Post Office Box 776
Mmturn. Colorado 81645
Alternative #fl - dngerioa- Conversions
Description of Alternative
Modify zoning regulations in order to allow for additional GRFA in existing homes that currently
exceed allowable GRFA, provided such additions do not add to the bulk and mass of the home.
Similaz to the 250 Ordinance, this alternative would only apply to existing homes. There would be
no change to the review process (i.e. GRFA system) for new construction. This approach is
intended to allow flexibility to owners of existing homes by allowing GRFA to be created within
the interior space of a home (i.e. loft additions, conversion of crawl space, etc).
Issues to be Addressed - ° Alternative must provide assurances that modifications to homes do not increase building
bullc and mass.
Proposed Language -
T'his alternative would be implemented with the addition of a new chapter in the zoning code
similar in the manner in which the 250 Ordinance has been structured. This chapter would have
the following major sections:
1) Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to provide flexibility and latitude in the use of interior spaces .
within existing single-fanuly and two-family structures that meet or exceed allowable
GRFA by allowing for the conversion of interior spaces to.GRFA provided certain
conditions and standards are met.
2) Applicabiliry
° Any existing single-fanuly residence or any existing dwelling unit in a structure
containing no more than two dwelling units shall be eligible to add additional
GRFA in excess of existing or allowable GRFA provided that the additional GRFA
complies with the standards outlined in paragraph 3 below.
° Multi-family units are not eligible for additional GRFA pemutted by the provisions
of this chapter.
3) Standards - ° Proposals for the utilization of additional GRFA under this provision shall not add
to or increase the building bulk and mass of the existing structure. Examples of
exterior modifications which add to or increase building bulk and mass include, but
are not limited to any expansion of the existing exterior form of the structure, re-
grading around a structure in a manner which exposes additional exterior walls, the
expansion of existing roofs and the addition of roof dormers. Examples of exterior
modifications which are not considered to add to or increase building bullc and mass
include, but are not limited to the addition of windows, skylights and window-
wells.
° Proposals for the utilization of additional GRFA under this provision sha11 comply
with all Town of Vail zoning standards and applicable development standards.
° If the proposal involves the conversion of a garage or enclosed parking space to
GRFA, such conversion shall not reduce the total number of enclosed on-site
parking spaces.
Phase IUGRFA Analysis
4) Process
• Application made to Department of Community Development to include applicable
forms, fees, and existing and proposed floor plans. Design review application shall
be required for all proposals involving modifications to exterior of buildings.
• Community Department staff shall review application for compliance with this
chapter and all applicable zoning and development review regulations.
• Proposals deemed by the Community Department staff to be in compliance with this
chapter and all applicable zoning and development review regulations shall be
approved. Proposals deemed to not compIy with this chapter and all applicable
' zoning and development review regulations shall be denied. .
. • Upon receiving approvals pursuant to this chapter, applicants shall proceed with
securing building permit priar to initiating construction of project.
Issues to Consider
The "mechanics" of implementing the interior conversion alternative are fairly straight forward.
Outstanding issues pertain primarily to when this option could be utilized by a homeowner. For
example, the language outlined above states that the purpose of this alternative is to "provide
flexibility and latitude in the use of interior spaces within existin~ single-family and two-family
structures". This begs the question of when is a home "existing". The following summarizes
implications relative to the appiicability of this alternative:
• Allow interior conversions for all homes
The potential concern with allowing interior conversions for all homes is that new homes -
will comply with GRFA but will be designed to ailow for the conversion of space in the
future. For example, it would be relatively easy to design over-sized void spaces in
basement levels and to design additional or larger vaulted spaces on upper levels, both of
which could then be converted to floor area in the future if this alternative is available to all
homes. The end result of this scenario could be new homes that are larger than they would
otherwise have been if interior conversions were not permitted.
• Require new construction (homes campleted after adoption of this ordinance) to wait a
certain time period prior to utilizing ordinance
If there is concern with the scenario outlined above, an alternative would be to require a
waiting period (i.e. the five years rec}uired for the 250 ordinance) before new homes could
apply for irrterior conversions. Having to wait a period of time could be a disincentive for
people who would otherwise design a home to accommodate future interior conversions.
However, this scenario does raise a question - if an interior conversion (and the potential
impact of larger homes designed specifically to utilize this provision) is deemed to be
acceptable after a five-year waiting period, why is it not acceptable after a one-year waiting
period, or a one-month waiting period?
• Limit interior conversions to homes in existence at the time ordinance is adopted
This is the cleanest way to implement the alternative. Limiting interior conversions to
homes in existence at the time the ordinance is adopted eliminates any potential concern
with homes being designed for future interior conversions. However, limiting interior
conversions to homes in existence at the time ordinance does raise an equity question - is it
fair to deny an owner who builds in the future the same opportunity available to other
homeowners?
Phase II/GRFA Analysis
A1~erunagave #2 - Basemeang Space
Description of Alternative
This alternative would amend the definition of GRFA to exclude basement space from calculation
as GRFA.
Issues to be Addressed
0 Develop a clearly stated definition of basement space, ensure that grades cannot be
artificially modified to allow for space to be interpreted as basement.
Proposed Language
The definition of GRFA includes paragraph 18.04.130 A. which excludes certain areas from
calculation as GRFA in buildings containing two or fewer units. In order to implement this
alternative, this paragraph would be modified with the addition of the following:
5. The floor area of any level of a structure that is located a minimum of six (6) feet below
natural grade (or existing grade prior to construction) at all points around the structure.
While this language is probably the cleanest, most straight forward way to exclude basement
space, is only excludes space that is 100% below grade. This alternative would not exclude
basement space for walkout levels. An alternative for addressing walkout levels is the following:
5. The floor area of any level of a structure that is located a minimum of six (6) feet below
natural grade (or existing grade prior to construction) at all points around the structure. For
any level which is partly above and partly below grade, a calculation of the portion of the
subject level which is below grade shall be made in order to establish the percentage of the
level which shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. This percentage shall be made by
deternuning the total percentage of lineal exterior wall of the subject level which is located a
minirnum of six (6) feet below natural grade (or existing grade prior to construction) which
shall then be multiplied by_ the total floor area of the subject level, and the resulting total
shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA.
Issues to Consider
0 Excluding basement space from calculation as GRFA will create the opportunity for new
"above grade" GRFA for new construction and for homes with basement space that was
previously calculated as GRFA.
0 One of the goals of this process is to simplify the GRFA system. The second alternative
which addresses walkout levels would add to the complexity of the existing system.
Should the exclusion of basement space include walkout levels or be limited to basement
space that is 100% below grade?
Phase IUGRFA Analysis
CALCULATION OF BASEMENT SPACE
. . i -
i,6'
~ i
~
i
Building Cross-section -
Point where basement
level is 6' below grade Slab on
grade Point where basement
~ level is 6' below grade
T
Basement Level 25'
1,250 sq. ft.
50'
Basement Level Floor P9an
CALCULATION
150' - LINEAR EXTERIOR WALL AT BASEMENT LEVEL
50' - PORTION OF EXTERIOR WALL 6' OR MORE BELOW GRADE
33%- PERCENTAGE OF BASEMENT LEVEL 6' OR MORE BELOW (50'/150')
1,250 (SQ. FT. BASEMENT LEVEL) X.33 = 412 SOUARE FEET EXCLUDED
,
a
A9teruaBtuve #3 - ElH?fl99II?a$~ GRFA
Description of Alternative
This alternative would eliminate GRFA as a tool for controlling the bulk and mass of single-family,
duplex and primary/secondary buildings. In order to prevent the development of lazge, non-
descript boxes, this alternative would also include more restrictive site coverage standards for
larger lots and new design guidelines that specifically address building bulk and mass. Existing
, GRFA regulations.would remain in place for structures that contain more than two dwelling units. _
Issues to be Addressed ~ Based on input from the community, the PEC and the Town Council, the major issues to address
relative to the potential implementation of this alternative are: 0 Assurances/controls must be established to prevent the design and construction of large,
non-descript box-like structures.
0 The DRB must be capable of interpreting and implementing any proposed modifications to
the design guidelines.
0 Any measures proposed to prevent large, non-descript box-like structures must not stifle
design creativity.
Proposed Language
This alternative would involve four major elements:
1) Initiate a"global search" of the zoning code to identify all references to GRFA pertaining to _
single-family, duplex and primary/secondary development. Examples of these references
include:
~ the definition of GRFA for buildings containing two or fewer units, and
0 the reference to GRFA in the density section of single family, duplex and
primary/secondary zone districts. :
2) New pazking requirements for single-family, duplex and primary/secondary units:
0 A minimum of three (3) off street parking spaces shall be provided for each single
family unit or for each dwelling unit within a duplex or primary/secondary
structure. Parking requirements for Type II, III and IV EHU's shall be as per the
EHU Ordinance.
3) New site caverage regulations to limit the site coverage (and size) of homes on Iarge lots:
Site coverage shall not exceed the total of:
1) 20% of the total site area for lots 25,000 square feet or less, plus
2) 10% of the total site area for any portion of a lot in excess of 25,000 squaze
feet.
With the exception of lots that exceed 30% slope, site coverage of 20% is currently
permitted on all lots regazdless of size. The proposal below would introduce a graduated
scale similar to the existing GRFA formula whereby allowable site coverage would
decrease relative to the size of the lot. Refer to the accompanying chart for an analysis of
how this new regulation varies from existing site coverage standards.
4) New design guidelines for single-family, duplex and primary/secondary buildings which
specifically address bulk and mass:
Phase IUGRFA Analysis
Buildiqiz Hei,ght, Bulk and Mass
The size and scale of single family, duplex and primary/secondary homes play an irnportant role in defining the character of neighborhoods and the overall visual image of a
community. Building height and site coverage regulations outlined in the Vail Zoning Code
establish quantitative standards which limit the overall size, or bulk and mass of buildings.
Notwithstanding these quantitative standards, site specific features such as vegetation and
topography and architectural solutions significandy influence the perceived bulk and mass
of a building.
, An underlying goal for the design of single family, duplex and primary/secondary.homes in _
Vail is to, ensure that buildings convey a human scale and aze sensitive to their site. Large,
monumental buildings which in the deternunation of the DRB dominate their site and express excessive bulk and mass are not pernutted. The following guidelines are designed
to accomplish these goals by establishing parameters to ensure appropriate building bulk
and mass. These guidelines apply to all single family, duplex and primary/secondary
homes:
Building Height
Buildings should convey a predominantly one or two-story building mass. Three-story
-
massing may be approved by the DRB, however, large expanses of continuous three-story
building mass is not permitted. Generally, the footprint of a third floor should not exceed :
50% of the floor azea immediately below and horizontal and/or vertical building off-sets
should be provided to reduce the perceived bulk and mass of the building.
Building Form
In lieu of lazge, monumental building mass, buildings should be designed as either a
composition of smaller, integrated building forms or in a form which consists of one
primary building mass in conjunction with one or more secondary building forms.
Rid elines
Changes in the height and orientation of roof lines add variety and interest to buildings
which can reduce building bulk and mass. The extent of variations in the height and
orientation of ridgeline elevations is dependent upon the characteristics of a site and the
design of the building. Generally, the maximum length of any continuous ridgeline should
not exceed 50-70' without a change in the orientation of the ridgeline or a variation of at
least 34' feet in the elevation of the ridgeline.
Sloning Lots
Buildings on sloping lots should be designed to "step" with natural contours of the site in
order to maintain a predominantly one to two-story building mass.
Building.Scale
A variety of architectural details can be incorporated into the design of a building to
reinforce human-scale and reduce the overall bulk and mass of a building. Use of the
following should be considered in the design of homes:
• Dormers
• Decks and balconies
o Roof overhangs
• Fenestration
Refer to the accompanying sketches for examples of how these design concepts can be more
clearly expressed in graphic form.
Phase II/GRFA Analysis
.
~
Issues to Consider
~ In order to not limit architects design creativity, qualitative guidelines are proposed in lieu
of quantitative standards. This alternative places a great deal of responsibility in the hands
of the DRB, is the Boazd capable of this task?
0 Are design guidelines explicit enough and will they provide the DRB with the tools
necessary to prevent "large, non-descript boxes"?
0 Is it necessary to reduce allowable site coverage for lazger lots or will a reduction to
allowable site coverage encourage taller buildings?
0 Are three parking spaces per unit adequate or is some other formula (i.e. based on number
' or bedrooms) necessary? .
. ° Is there a need for design guidelines which address bulk and mass regardless of whether or .
not changes are made to the GRFA system?
Phase IUGRFA Analysis
_e
~
Town of Vail GRFA Analysis
Potential Design Guidelines/No GRFA Alternative
Building Form
In lieu of large, - -
. , monumental building
mass, buildings should L ,
be designed as either a ~ - ,
composition of smaller, -
integrated building forms
or in a form which • a;
consists of one primary
building mass and one or
more secondary building
forms.
Composition of building fornzs reduces building bulk and
mass.
Secondaryform
- - - = Primary form
- ~ ~ - -
_ .
-
- - ,
- -
- r
. ~ .
Primary form
Secondary form
f
~ '.a ~ • ~ ~
„
-
Examples of primary and secondary building forms.
These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside of the Town of Vail, it is not suggested that these exact
sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Rather, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to remforce the
design guidelines proposed For the "no grfa" alternative.
a
Tovvau of Vaal GIZFA Analyses
Potentnad Design Guadelines/No GItFA Alterraative
Bena8d'nang HeagtnQ
Buildings should convey a
predominantly one or two-story
building mass. Three-story
massing may be approved by
the DRB, however, large
expanses of continuous three-
story building mass is not
pernutted. Generally, the
footprint of a third floor should
not exceed 50% of the floor
area immediately below and
horizontal and/or vertical - - -
building off-sets should be `
provided to reduce the
perceived bulk and mass of the ~ ~
building.
Three stories are appropriate because floor area of third level does not ezceed SO% of level below.
~
:1., .
' `J ITTT=_-
~i
-
i
S ~
1
Variation in ridge line elevations, building offsets, use of dormers and decks reduce bulk and
mass, building does not "read" as three stories.
7Cown of Vail GRFA Analysis ~
Potential Design Guidelfnes/No GRFA Alternative
Ridgelines
Changes in the height and :
orientation of roof lines add ~ 7S0 =10` ~
variety and interest to buildings
which can reduce building bulk
and mass. The extent of variations
in the height and orientation of
ridgeline elevations is dependent
upon the characteristics of a site .
and the design of the building.
Generally, the maximum length of
any continuous ridgeline should
not exceed 50-70' without a Ridgelines greater than 50'-70' should be off-
change in the orientation of the set at least 34'.
ridgeline or a variation of at least
34' feet in the elevation of the
ridgeline. ~
Variations in roof ridgelines ~ .
provide variery and breaks-up ~
building mass created by ~
continuous ridgeline.
~ I
• _ _ .
Change in ridge line e[evation and orientation creates two distinct
building forms and breaks up building mass.
These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside of the Town of Vail, it is not suggested that these exact
sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Rather, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to reinforce the
design guidelines proposed for the "no grfa" alternative.
a
Town off Vanfl Gg2FA Analysis
]Poteuatuafl Desflgn GuadeYnenes/No GRFA Alt~rnative
Sfloping ]Lots
Buildings on sloping lots
should be designed to "step"
" with natural contours of the site in order to maintain a -
predominantly one to two-
story building mass. s -
s
s
i
s
'
a
s
~
~
~
s
~
Building mass should be "benched" into the hillside.
~
„_o `
~
r~
~ i1~.s •
Y ~
\ • ~ ~ ~ ~ e.
Building steps with the natural contours of the site to maintain one-two story massing.
These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside of the Town of Vail, it is not suggested that these exact
sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Rather, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to reinforce the
design guidelines proposed for the "no grfa" alternative.
i
Town of Vail GRFA Analysis
Potential Design Guudelines/No GRFA Alternative
. Building Scale A variety of azchitectural details can be
incorporated into the design of a building to '
reinforce human-scale and reduce the
overall bulk and mass of a building. Use of .
the following should be considered in the ~
design of homes: • . ' •
•Dormers ' • .
•Decks and balconies
•Roof overhangs
•Fenestration . • ~ .
~
. ' , .
J~
a~!r f
~
f 1 Building offsets, roo,fline and dormer
~ all contribute to reduce the mass of
this building.
,
.
i
. •A Bay window and balcony reinforce
human-scale.
These sketches are from design guidelines for projects outside of the Town of Vail, it is not suggested [hat these exact
sketches be used for GRFA related guidelines. Rather, this example illustrates how sketches could be used to reinforce the
design guidelines proposed for the "no grfa" alternative.
k
~
. a
Othea- Issues Relatave. to GRFA Amenriments
1. Amendments for EHU's and Permanent Residents Only
During previous discussions comments were made to allow the provisions of these alternatives in
conjunction with the development of EHU's or only for permanent residents of Vail.. These are
Town Council policy decisions. The information outlined above addresses the technical aspects of
each alternative. Limiting the applicability of these provisions to only EHI1's and/or permanent
residents could be done. This would not, however, further the original intent of this process
which was to:
° Evaluate the effectiveness of GRFA as a means for controlling building size
° Address the time required to administer the current system
° Resolve the appropriateness issue of the Town regulating interior floor space Limiting the applicabiliry of any GRFA amendment to either encourage EHU's or for the benefit of
permanent residents only could be incorporated into any of the three aiternatives.
2. Vavlted Space
One recognized short-coming of GRFA is that it regulates floor azea and not building volume and
as a result GRFA does not effectiveIy control buiIding buIk and mass. Aspen is the only
communiry that has been identified which addresses vaulted space with floor area regulations. The
Aspen code essentially applies a multiplier to the floor area of vaulted space. For example, floor
azea with IO' plate heights or less count at a ratio of one square foot for each one squaze foot. For
interior areas with a plate height which exceeds 10°, the ratio increases by .OS feet for each foot
over 10' up to a maximum ratio of two square feet for each one square foot (i.e. an interior space
with 15' ceilings is calculated at a ratio of 1.25 square feet for each one square foot of floor area).
Phase IUGRFA Analysis
dd
e4
TOWN OF D'L7llIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Manager
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2105/Fa,x 970-479-2157
MEMORAIVDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager
DATE: April 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report
Construction Uadate
Because of the full construction season that's upon us, I wanted to update you on proposed
construction projects and scheduling. Please note: these dates are tentative and may change.
West Vail Interchange April - October
Public Works Administration Building May - September
Public Works Employee Housing Project May - December
Dowd Junction Bike Path May - June
Ford Park Rec Path May - June
Vail Road Overlay September
West Forest Road Overlay May - June
Big Horn Park Parking May - June
Municipal Parking Lot Overlay May
W. Entry to Municipal Building June
Vail Valley Drive (including VAC Bridge) May - August
Transportation Center Improvements May/June or Sept/Oct.'
Frontage Roads Overlay (CDOT) June - July
Avon Roundabouts April - October
Highway 6 April - July
Interstate 70 Overlay (Wolcott to twin bridges June - July
in Eagle-Vail)
1This project involves replacing the deteriorating pavers around the TRC and
reconstructing the stairs down to Slifer Plaza. This also includes installation of snow melt
systems under these areas.
RECYCLED PAPER
~ . TOV/Eagle County Revenue
At your joint meeting several weeks ago with the County Commissioners, one of the issues
discussed was the amount of money returned to the Town from Eagle County. Because Steve
Thompson was not present, I did not raise the issue of revenues which are actually collected in this
part of the County.
The following reflects the amount of revenues generated in this area for the County and the amount
returned by the County to the Town of Vail.
Sales tax the County collects in Vail (1% County sales tax) $2,990,180
County sales tax returned to Town of Vail $ 484,527
Total property tax collected in Vail $3,484,701
Property tax returned to Town of Vail (road and bridge levy) $ 489,800
I do not want to make an issue of this, but I thought you should be advised of the amount of
revenue which is generated by the Town; as well as the amount being returned to the Town, since
I believe this more accurately reflects the Council question as posed.
Frontage Road Maintenance
For several years we have been concerned about the maintenance (or lack thereofl of the Frontage
Roads by the Colorado Department of Transportation. During our discussions regarding the
roundabout funding, CDOT requested we assume maintenance of these roads. We indicated to
them that given the poor condition of the roads, and the fact this would significantly increase the
lane miles of the road we have to maintain, we were not willing to accept this responsibility.
Most recently, we have been exploring with CDOT the possibility of entering into a maintenance
agreement to provide maintenance for these roads. Under this scenario, CDOT would provide
funding for road maintenance and snow removal. The actual work would be done by the Town of
Vail. These additional funds would allow us to hire additional plow drivers in order to assume this
maintenance.
Larry Grafel, Greg Hall, and I believe this is a viable alternative to improve maintenance and snow
removal on the Frontage Roads without unduly burdening the Town of Vail general fund. We are
currently exploring what these costs would be and what CDOT funding would be available. I will
keep you advised regarding this issue.
RWM/aw
APR. 8. 1997 1:54PM MAC EQUIPMENT, INC, N0. 0940 P. 1 xe;
s
VELLAGE CIEN= ASSOCYATT'IOPI 120 Willow Bridga Itoad
Vai1, CO 8 1657
The 'fown Council
Towrsa of VIil
75 5outh Fauaatap Itoad
Vul, CO 81657
April 791997
Deag Council Members: '
On several occasfons during the pasg ssvesal ffionths ilillage Cen4err Condoreiiniums Association (Vallage Center)
has expressod suppoa4 for the aedevelopffient p1anB preseuted for the "now" Auetria Hauus. ,
Out support is based, in par, upon the applicaat's ageeffient to a deed rostrictiom prohibiting a restauraat
operation within tthc buUding.
17ie Platning and Envirommtal Commission and the Caffimimity %7evelopment sffiff have agaecd to the deed
rostriction.
On Mar6h 25? 1997, the Vail Town Coun6al "°suggested" the restrictioa on rostaurant usc he reconsidered.
Village Contcr stroagly opposes the remoesl of this decd restriction.
i
Village Ceater is adjacent to two res4aurants in Villagc Center Building D. VVe know frora experience that
PeBffiUfBnYs 6Y6aw:
• aaily dolavcry of eupplies
o daily aenmoval of traah
O IIO18C
0 objeLlionable odors
Because of Vai19B L614ck YP+guI?34OnSy the daily delivesies are made dueing the early morning howrs and am tnos4
distaarbing. A gestmurant in the "raevr" Austria Haus will aggravato an alresdy undesirable situation.
T'he "new"Austria Hatas has eolun4arilgr agreed $o a coum of aWon thet reduces Vail's traffic and noise. We
uege you to leave iai phice the appliearat's argument to the xesizuction on restaurant use ia the building.
Slncerely, .
C~ax'y D~na~l
~sid ~ Village Ceai4er Acwcia4aon
ce: Joe TPeleven
I
I
Subjecl: Sonnenalp Auslria Haus SDD
~ Special Intuclions: Please revielv and respond as appropriafe. ~
~
_ . . .
C:~L ~
e
i ~
. ~ '
. V
t
LI`
`
~
~
d
t V* (~j
~
- - ---s
~ ~
V \
~
. . LAn I! - V 111..JLAk3-R!, AX111VIr1 p VW
~
f.ifticers: Nresidcnt - Iloh Uahdn tizCl'z1113' "ztfl N11"k,,s TI'215i11'21' - P1tl'ICI' li1a111111 -Dircclun - JLidiQi Ecrhowiu - Dolpti Bridgcwatcr - Ellic Cauu:uu - Rc.a Lxioc\ - Eill Mortoii -Co:uuc ddcr
'1'0: 13oti CUalvui and 13oard of L)u•cctors
lntare:;ted Partizs ~
From: Jim L~~imnt, Licctitivc ilu•cctor ~
nate: .april g, 1997 V
RF.: Sonr,analP .austria Haus RedeveloPment issuz;
' The Si,nnznalP .au5lria Haus Spacial e~•zlt>Pmznt l~i~tri • r~czi.~~zd a~-2 vc,te 'aPPrc~val c~n (irst
, readin~'- 5ecc~nd rzadin~ is scheduleei (i~ .~j~ril 15. 199 - ,
T{ie prc~pc,5al has stirred re~nsidzrah e Pu la' ccmtrc~vzrsy hecause c,l'thz magnitude of sevcral Spaeial ne-
vcluplncrit llishicr dcviarion; froiii tlic undcrlyuic niblic Aca>iuinodalioti zonc distiYCt. '17ic proposed btiild'uig's
sizc (VltF.1). liciglrt. :ctbicks, a11d 111t; I11am
llh1dC Of ft1C pTcc.-dCllt UC121p SCt AIL' fl1C pI'lII1C p01I1ts Of COI111•ovorsv.
Thz existinsY huildinS,1 is to he demoli5hed and rePlaced with a new strurlure. .
'1'lic Ilcnncow7ici'S _~~tioC1Rt1oI1 Co11t1I111Cs t0 t>pp0sC fllc I•odcvClopi11t;Ilt Of ?11C SOIlI1CIlaip .1ustrYS llaus ac a
Special i7evelopn,ent r)istrict because 01' the Polenlisl (tx advertiz eIT~cls Ircmi signi(icanl densitv increasati (br
\-'iil \'i118eC Al1d fl1C COlllllllilllh' I•cstiltuig fi•otn flic magiuhidc ;~ud sc~-?pc of tiic dc facto prcccdciit l~cuig cst.~b-
lislied. ~iillcsc substantix-c ~>ppc,sitian can bc bi'Olip-llt t0 bCaI' 11p011 thC Tllw21 C'ouncil. flic preccdvnts mid abciY•a~
lic,ns creatzd hv the Special T)zveloprnznt District .vill ecmtinue 10 worsan. Thz Hcnneownerti ,4stiociaticm has joined witli otticr uitcrest~ to zdvucatc rccn7ctuig tlic latitude of dcviations frum thc allowcd zuturig crandards pcr-
niittcd liy i Spcciil llcx•clopliicnt llistrYCt.
lllll'lilp_ thC j 0vvll C'ounuil': dcbatc A 111AjOI'11y Ot tI1C Co1111C11 lI1C111boTc criticized tlic sizc c.~i thc propusod
bUIIdIII'?. H(1N\Z\'Cf_ Li?L111Clllllitll PSl1I .T(1I1t1tiIOTl_ lil a IllOUOtl lfill{1 tiC1'Cf3I Cd)i1CllllO11ti, swavzd a mlijority of thC
Li>uncil 10 supPOrt thz prc,ect. in 1992_ thz re,uncilman reezivzd a Special r)evelopment T)istrict lbr lhe exPan-
S1uT1 Ot ti1C CIll'1St1allla L.u~i'C. xv111CI1 I1C Oiti'lls, SCC att.1C11Cd1 OR'll l7f 11l ICltel' t0I' C021d1hOI1S.
.austria Hauti dzvzlonzrs_ in respc>nse lo thz ccmdilicros sel Oul in the (irsl rzading, have modi(ied lheir pra-
posal. '1'lic aiiiotuit c>f scluire foomeC 111 ?ilc b1111d111' Il:lc l1o111CC11 I•cdiiccd. lt is rcpotficcl tliat tlu•otigli tlic rodo-
siSI'n c,('thz huildin,''s lacadz tliz avera~*z hzi;ht of the titruclure has heen redueed h~' (ivz leet. TI» ProPosed
huildinv has hezn nic,vzd larther nc,rlh. a~~av ('rcnn lhe strzam tr~ici. .additiunallv. the amc~unt c~l'c~n-silz P-trl:in;
can bc iiicrc~~scd b~• ci~-tQ~.n spaccs if t~ic T6u7i of V111 C11tC1'S lllt0 a IAI1d C1CI1:1t1eC toi• au arca noi-di of tlic AushYa.
Haus sile. X,\'ith l{iis.zXchanvz thc .austria HauS undzryround pv-I:in~ structurz can he exp~tndzd. Inli~rnied c>h-
sciv~crc bclicvc rh,~t so~iic of tlic a>ndiriaiis N~~ci•c iiielticfCl~ 111 C~I'C~~:I• to p1acatcs tlic pi'OjCCYs Opp0IlClltS aI1C1 fl11Y lt 1C
. 1?oss1b1c tha.t sc,iiic cif tlic iiiorc i,iicrouc conditions, siicli a tlic purcliacc of clcvCll I1Cw C111U1ok'CC llOUSlllg 11111tS,
\\ill be rri<i•- ed l~ 11ie Tuwn (_'ctiLux•il c~n secc,nd reaciulv. ;
, Thz proPi>sed buildiny is apProximal~l`1 r,.n 1• _zr than i, al)cn\ed hv the Puhlic; Acccnnmodalion xcme
dicti•ict, :UI ZOlllllg, Sta11d1I'ds-'a1'C 111 CSCCS,.K pt . ~I'lllll'tCd 111 'CI1C ZO11C dlcn'ICt. Scc a.ttachcd zonuig cta.tisric
c.ilCulated hv the Town o('~.a;l. .a~ ~ co?„rar„o~t,_ „111, oiher receni SPecial 17eveiopmenl ]7islricls in Vai) Vil-
lagz fbr huildinvs or tiiles uneizrvoinsz, redevclc>Pmznt_ lhz C:hri.~ tnrtl ing incrzased in sire hy iill(.I CtilIT11i1tCd
181'-i,, tlic Uold~ii Ycak llouc~ ti-v 20~0 mnd thc ~~ail:ltlilctic C'h 1,: 33~•0. (_icer thc past ccvcral vcarc, it is un=
portant to reco,Tnir.e lhat thzre has heen stzaclv redevelc,pment 01'hLn1dinys throuuluxit NI-ail N'"illatye wilhOul re-
sortiiw to exlreme densitv ineraaszti. Two ecimmzrcial;residential huildingti in N'ail Village werz davelc>ped in
--r conipliancc to tiic zunuig dcnsity `t.zndards xvitliui ui tlic la:t tlu•cc }-ears..
'17ic pt'OpUSCd 11SCC 111 fllc AuSh'18 IIaUS I11Cil1dC 1'Ct.zil coiiiiiicrcill. na restaui'a11t 111d a COt11UlI11t'1021 of 1'TaCh011a1 1'CC ~'1u1~ units ziid liotcl t'l~0II1S. ! I1C 1'I'~lCh~>llill 1'CC C ~111~1 Illlllts fl1C hI11GCl11I'C lI1CI'CI11Cllt pCI' OVITl~'1'°
`•ship to (ive Weel:ti. The To\\;n COuncil approvzd the Fr<<clicmal Fze Cluh (br timetihare Lmilti in lhe Puhlic
~ r PkA-t i?tflce Florx 2.49 'VaiL i'olorac:lt) S1f;:, R _
iT2I21)I1Cr112: (970) 827-3080 \1ec(t)'U)
.
.
C• ~ o .
- -
:
-
. . . .
- . . . : _
' ' . ' ' 'd'. ~."a . .a • ' X S , - 1' . . . . ' r.:.`' _ , . . ` 4 . ~ . • - 'S. . ` . - ' • ' . '
.
LVIL1'Sc.~iuicna.lp :Vistt7a Iiauc tipccial llevclopnicnt llistl7ctApplication: =6/7:'1997
:~CCOITllIlOda.h011 ZOI1C d1Sh'1Ctt lll .JAllil9ly. it rcquu'Vd fll:l.t :iIly pI•c-C11Ct'i11Q h01C1 TOoII1S 111i1St 11C IL'tauicd 'ui tliv
Prc~jaci eilher by rzPlacin; thz number dholel rcx>rns or the amcxmt ol'CTRFA. The Fraetional Fee dwzllin~ Lmits
ha~~e Ic~ck-c~lY' hedrexoms but were ncal allcnved b,y lhe Tc~wn C:cxmcil lo he suhsliiuted ~ts an eyui~~alenl li~r hatef
i'OOIll~. ' .
Many of tlle oPPcments t roPosal arz m ? ' h the 1cm~ standing position c~l iI1C HOt71C-
0\LTl~:I'C Z1CsOC1~ihC111 fll:~t C'N 1 S fAl'=PCRC~ ~ ' liit 0~1~.~'_(~4VL A ~ 111YC1'V`tt ~l'lll B.ffCT11~1t t0
, rerlicale or exPau,d. Town «dministrators_ tivit u7)ut 5uhslantive sTui ancz roili thc Town Cc>uncil, hare ne,o- .
. „ tiateci eYacticros (rom the dzvzlopzr in exe_han;a their suPPc~rl c~l'the prc~pc~sed deveIc~Ptnent. Tc~wn adi»inistralc~rs. .
1i'C t1C1I1p CI'11TC1ZoC~ t0I' IlOt C~>11C1111Y11~' 4;c1I'1y'°Oll ~'~'l~l fl1C T0i1'll COllT1C11 OIl tt1C C1'fCllt Ot 1i1C dVV1a.h0I1S alld Cxa.c=
liimti lh~ administrators' had :?greed uPcm with the Prc>ject'S deveioPers. The Tc»vn Coulcil was przcluded Irom
' 1~~01'1~i110I1C llllhl fI1C UTOjcct i`vac woll uito ttic fuia.l sta.ges of tlic a.pproval proccss. 'lhcrc is ttic a.Ppcarancc tka.t
1h4 1 Ov71 :1dIllllllStratorc cought ta mroid t1ic policy ccttfiig atitiiority of dw, '1'ovim t'auiicil: I415 ILp02'tCd fL4L
Tcwn administrators see no Prohlarns wiih lhe currenl •"-,T?D Iegi.~lalion in lhat il gives them ccrosiderablz Ilaxibil-
iht aiid litihidc with iuuiuiial interfcrcncc froiii tiic '1'o-vL7i t'oiuicil to ncgotiaxe r:d=loJimcmt prqjcq#,-.
olitical ohserver> hzlievz lhat thz Tcwn administraticm is laking advan(ava~i~x 17
'll ~.~~UI1CO111C CO1111C11 T11Ci11UCI'c' ll1C"UCI'1CI1CC i111kCC 1~1CII1 iR3~I1CI'a.tll~; t0 ~1CCOIIllt1~ 11IriV11h.t1€ S t0.
1 IC < cc Al~d pTOCCdlIP11 llla11ci1VCI'S of TOVVll aCII111Ills$'AtioI'C. SOv-i;Tal obScI'l%Cl'S t1c;Ili:Vc; 111a.? ?hC Tad1CAl a.ppll"
caticm of the Sr)D_ as wzll as lacl: o('ccmtrcyl and c>versigI1L bV tI1C T(1Wn C'OLmcil aver Tcnwn Administralorti, will
CSCa.11tC ll1tU a S1g1llf1Cfillt 1SSilC 111 tlllC o-f;ill's 0NN 'ons.
Tn ruarv_ ihz Homeowners associal'icm m a memorandum direcied at Tawn adrliinistrators requested °that I couipartlh"'C 1111IVS1S Ot pi'CvlOl1S1Napprovcd Special llcvclopnicnt llishYCts ui Va.il k'illa.go bc prov7dcd to-
'the Te,wn C;Ouncil and the~ puhlic. The Purpc,se cil'lhe comParalive analvtiis wss le> give a hasis c>I'comparisc>n in
m/ order ti, lairlv evaluate the ap~pri~prialeness c~f allc,win~ the Special 1~evele~Pment T)itilrirl tc~ he utied tc~ apPraved
tI1C c~Ce2'CC Ot~~'i1'Iih011 ti'l~lll t1C 1111dCI'b,'ll1' ZLllllll' sta11d82'CIS bc111e j)TOposcd br tlic ltishYa liaus dcvclopci'S.
Thz 016rnialiun has not heen providzd hy - Tcy%\n administrators lc7 the Tc~N,\n Cc>uncil. :
dccisioii by tlic La.elc C=011211ti• llisti7ct COL1I't lIl A clllt L1Touglit l.i~~ ati aclja.cont pr~~pci~~ ou7icr rcgarding
thz ~'~~il :athletir Cl~ih Sr)T? -PPears tci have cc~nlirnied the rivht c>I'the Tc»Wn Cciuncil to apProve a Speeial
r)evelormznt r)itilrict tiuhjeet to rzcluired Puhlic hearin,* and review proQedures. .4s a ccroseyuence, wilh0ui
I11111t:1h0I1S j)11CCd ll1?Oll tI1C dCaIL`C Ot dCv1i1h0I1 tI'OTll lllldcI'1yll1L Z011ll1g Sta1ldRI'dS, aSl}' Sl1t1cLql1CI11 AppI1CaIlt t01' a.
ST)r) %vill zxPec.t similar treatment as that conlerred upon thz .Ausiria Haus dzvelc?pcrs. The e'onse uencz c>('
dotiUliiie tlic cicn&ity_of tlic multifillllllv1T1d COt1ll11C1'C1a1 aI'C8S Ut TI1C CO1Tll1111Ill1v 1s CaUsC t0I' COt151~CfA.t11C C021°
CCIYl. llCVC10j?I11Cllt li1fCTCctti f~ll' j)1'I~~CCfiS ~l~lt AI'~.pCll(~ll1~L'. 1~1I'Otl~llOllf t~1C COl 111~' aTC Wa.tClllll~ Y11C 11llctrYa -
HLlUS LIeCItiIOIl CIO`
.
TC~~~'Il !~C~Illllllch•~toi•c lia~c uccd t~ic ct.arion ~,t cilcc t:ix cvciiucs ac tllcir i'CacOil fOI• promotuig major
incrzases in dzvelc~pmenl. particularly firr hi~h c~ccupanc~• timeshare. hc~tel and retail uses. increatiingly lhiti sup- ry
pOSih011 t01' 111C1'C1S111g ?l1C CltCIlY 1IIC~ TatC C~t e1'O«ol1 1S COI11111L 1111dc2' Cl'1t1CISIII b}' II1Rily lIl thC IOCa1 1't:il CCt.9tC lIl=
dl1Sh'y a11C1 tI1C COlllllllllllh' fl.1' 1aI'pC. 1I1C1'C 1C ~11 Cv01viil ` i11,,SS1i1.9.1'tI1C il11111htA.hVC p1'1CC pA.1d tOT lI1CPl:aS1I1€', .
municipal revenuzs_ in Order lc> sustain a11d Cqsn 1lit tiiit -l('munic•.IPttl gc,vernmenl. }iven thal ihe ec~mmunit~~ Iti
morc tliin ~)0~ }~~llllt Ollt. 1S 11C>t it'~~I'tIl ll1t71ChllL i~llillt,~ti~~c danzaec: resulting fi'C>Ill T11~JOf iiicrcascs ui build'ui~, -'lnd popttlitiini dcnsitics. '1'hc lloincoiN7icrs Associarion oPposcc t11c crc,~tioii of Spccial llcN~clupiiicnt llistlicn licc~.uscit rcgards `them as ;ranls c~f special pri~~ile~*zti lc~ sc~mz devzlc,Pers whilr heing gznzrally denied to all olhzr prc>Perl,y owners. :
1t is tliz Potiiliom ol* thz He,mzownzr5 Associ<<tion that rcmin~* re,ulatii>ris arz meani!Wless unlesti lairly and cansis-
tcnrtly :1~)1)I1Cl~ t0 .`•lll p2'01)CI'11' U~~"1101'S. 'l i1C 1j0I11C0\~'I1CTs :AS,CC11~'IOIl (~OCC llOt cl11 _ lat hiivins~ Jv~.~~`re
CT11T71eT1I I171PUti d\tlCllililti, adCllUOIl}.tl CjClltilty 1T7 CYGIIaTIvt' I(11'y~fc+r_~i•nnt imnrnvrnitnlc:Ifld dtc+d &~e
}1'17LT.ST11` . e~t ier (air c~r cunsitii~n r~~ ~V cir dc,zs it lurl~'~' iT~r lfi~_ rn,~•i ~c+r~ Ir.-+.lm,~n~ Ol'({1C' GUITlilllllllty'ti prc~perl~~ QWTI- -
CI'S.
The Hcmiei~wnzrs .as,* .5alion has advocaiz utiing thz pri:cess o('rzxoninu tc> avoid the implicaticm al'es-*
t;1t111SI11i1e a l.OIIliTluIll1y wId dc facto prcccdcn , t Coi11a3110w d1C dOlllilulg Ot dCI1S1f1CC lll aII tlllt ZOI1C Cx-6GpY x
.
2
' , xyr
,
. . . -
. - •~h . . _ _ . . ' . ' - ' . ' ' ' . -•7 v,
r^~•. . -j` . ' . . . ` ~h'.~.d"
i
LV1LISonncnalpAushYa Ilau: Spccia.l llcvclop~~~c~~rllictiYCt:lpUlicar-_iii: 4%i~`l7
tOI' YllOSC ZOIlc d1511'iCtS C1LIT1pfiCd ti•oiti Sllll'S (5111glC taIIlll}'. dl1pIC~i, alld pl'1II11I1','CCt;uildaI1'). KCZOIllI1~L' a1I0wC
(i>r rreatinv a szparata i0nz disirict and chanve i.cntinu slandardti to accoLml lbr }irorerties lfial are in proxiiliil\to
- cach otlicr, sliarc suni1iI' COIld1tIo11S pt 13Cc. AI1d ptn'S1Ca1 CI1a1'aCiCI'1StiC S11C11 as, .,1ZC ZIld l141pI1t. A rczonuig is spc-
- c,ilic to parlicular praPerties in a sPzcific nzighhc>ncoxod snd lhus daes nai create a ufrnmunity wide Precadent as
' docc nn 'llll. ~
_ Tli4 IIotiicowYici•s .'1c.sc.,ciariori liac pasmcipItcci fi•oii2 thc -,,citi• bcguiiuip, of tlic To-tvii of Vail's puUlic r:- .
;ie\\ prc,czsti.~t has consistzntl,• advc>cated lhe rexonin; mzihod as a tool lbr rzdzvzlc>Pment. Autitria Haiiti de- .
. velopers have not oPPosed rzrcminsz ati an aceePtahle rlieihod lbr their Prc>ject to avoid setling a c0mm1.miiy,-wida
~rcccd~irt. '11i~v ci•cciit `l o«Yi admii~icn•ators ~~-itli rciltiu~sig tiictii to f~~llo~~% tlic Sllll pTOCCC~.ll1y:. 'l~icrc is t~ic ap°
. pnzarance thal Town adminislrators are usin~ the S~>nnenalP Aiistr'• . a me~ • te~ eslablished a de lactc~ pre-
ccdcnt that politic~llv ~,Uliga.tcs r1lc Tov~~~ C'ouncil to a.pProvc ll'c u1ti~ • havc similar cximrnc
- dCvlA.t'lOTlt tY'oTIl tIIC i111dC2'1ylilp- ZOI11I1p stRI1C1aI'dS.
'1'l1C I It>1T1o0lm1CI•s :lscociztioii ut'~C, itS ITICII1beI•s arid affiliatcs to activcly opposc tlic rca.riori of a Spc- ~
~ c.ial r)evelopmenl 17ititrict (br the 'Scmnenalp AuStria Haus. You are urged io wrilz ar conlael ie Town Gounc;il
~ t0 C1r)I'CSs i'OlI1' CCl11CCIY1-s I'Cgai'd111L t1lls II1i.f'CCI'. A COpV Of thC COI1t.9.Gt SI1VCt f02' 1j1C TOWYl Co11I1 11 15 A.1'taGhGd. -
_4O
~
. ~
J.
3
:;k
9 FILE WL
Copy TaU 75 Souc)a F'rontageRoad Departrnent of Cvrntlrunily ,peyelppp;erct -
Pai4 Colorada 81657
990499 2138l47s-zrs9
FAX 970-479-2452
- . ' M=h 26, 1997
` .
9
" Go:dorr Picrcc , .
P'icrcc, S--gcrbcr& $nd Associaccs Arch?Yccts
1000 SOu$Il FTTffTlt$gC Q03d WCSt, #300 Vai[, Colorado 81657 _ . .
Ro; COnditlon5 Qf ApprGvaI and 04hCf PS.4ucs RCgardir.g FirSt RC3tIirig of Ot+dinaftcc #4. Scrics - _of 1997.
. 1)car Gordon, - 4?n March 25, 1997, dic tlaii Town Cvun6i1 approvcd Qrdinancc 94, Scrics of tg47Q on fasst
rcadina (5-2), 'I"hc appflpval carricd dvith it scviceal conditicros. nc purposc of this (cEtcr is ta
iteforim you of the oDnditiotls 3nd sevemi o4her issuC,c taiscd hy the vaciou5 c4uncil tttCmbors,
Tfle scvcn conditions of approral arc_
1. Tlat ali the requircd garkiag, apaces bc cons-tnactcd on-site rather than payirrg into
the Toum Parking Fund. Iinc Councii witI consider a iand tradc arcdtor a ta:td icasc
wath the applicar?t ta achicvc the oti-sitc parking rcquircmcnt. edod-w
2. That Y (2) cT~cksi c dwc1ling uniPs (gr~ctional fcc ciu units be conv acco modaaeion un' Z
3. That the applicant iaistaii acad opcratc the stnect beating stern uunder East Meadow .
Brivc, adjacen2 ta the AcLStria Hsus, :
4. '~t the applicant agracs nat t emonsirate ' st a stres,mwa.Ik. in the T.Q.V. .
strcaan tract, adjacent to the us ' us should the 'Iown cboasa to cx d hc p'_
stmarnwatk.
S. 'I1sae the applicanY ercgc 11 new, deed=restrictcd cmploy housing units aather
thatn deed-restricting I Iexisting, dwelIin,g cnits. ~
I
6. Thaf the apglica~t ree= to the 4'1anning & Envi.rerx--nevtaI Canamissioa pri.or to
- ~=f
_
. .~'s ; cYF~~`',a~'~''t-4-a~.,n•-sx.:.8 1 ,~y~ .r~-4"-: o -d-,n- s. „e~ ~ . . u .,t . .
. t"C. s i.~/~+'1.j^ cR~.,x;Aa,.,.•'•_w .Y -a.K~ a ^ ~ . ti v":a . .r _!r'dT,~h3^35 S$ti.~'~ f ' -i. . . .
' ~...rt>} ~ 7' c y~- -*ar r`! , .r.,,p c~ ~ y. a w . ti y ~Y t~.ry i r ~ . •i
~ s e 'rYrn~T ..'M .S ~t~ 4r~c'~" r- r Y sa''t,-bw ` T .°a.. °`Y,~ ' ' -~rv
` ' - ~ - - - - - -
' 9 1
sccond reading of the ordinancc fgor cra6ari of the nctiv roof cidec tinc cfcsiign
intcndcc] to rcdus6 the hcight of uitding and the rtewly proposr-4 buiiding
ctcvations.
7. That thc appIicant pr sent an alternetc toading/dcIivcrytparking plsn prior to
, . sECOrrcl rcading af the ordinancc. Ohcrissucs mentioncd b}, the va:ious councii mcmbcrs includc:
~
1. ReCOnsider the rCStriCQiOa ore restaueant usC aIl thc bui[ding_
.
Incrcasc the sgre$rn sc;tback distancc ai the south sidc of buildi #o l ~
. furthcr protcction of Gorc GYcck. ~ ~ -
3. Esevtral loci~-off units with titc intcnt of rcducing thc crovcc~lt
tagc of the buitding. `
4• Removc the clock totivcr frorn the bui lding.
. S. Bncrcasc YPtc atio of accocnmodation units tQ fractional fcc unit5.
I havc scheduIeci your requc:st for a finaI rcvicw of the amcndcd SDD praposa4 on the Pfanning
aiid Er?viranmcntal Cer,tmission (PEC) a or nday, Apri( 14. Thc pEL w;11 rcvicw the
arr,cnded piatts aad forwaed a rccorn da.tion to the own Counci[ prior to sccand reading. Sccond rca,ding mf the ordinancc is iv iv 5ch cd for ?ucsday. April 15. i witi confirrn the
Tuwr. Couricil rncctina datc with yo vcry ncar futurc.
Should you havc any questions or con ~s, as. nlwdys, ptcaac do no? hcsita4c to givc mc a ca11_
You can rea.ch rnc most casiiy at 479-2145.
Sincerely,
C;ea ac Ruther
?own Plariraer
AUStl MA±DMI,fi
IAY siza: 24,089 sq. W;. fO.S53 acres Buidable area- 24.089 sq, ft. ;0.553 aeres
_ ' . Develapmen4 Uwdedying Zoning Ordinenae ~ Peoposed SDQ Standerd OP PLibfic Accommodation (SDD #12l9984)
GflFA; 8{190 or 19,271 ;q. ft, 1 185". or 28,591
sq_ tt. 168% or 40,429 ag. fL -
<
Dw011ing . ~•r~
units per acre, 73.8 [)U'S . 34.5 DU's 35 OU's (22 DU's, .
(2 DU's & 65 Al.l's) 25 AU's, 1 Type 118 EmU)
Si;e coverage: 55% or 79,249 sq, tt. 71/o or
~ 68eAo OP 86,394 sq. 4t.
Satbackn: 17.903 sq. F4, .
front: 20'
sides: 20'
Itl/P4 p~~p ~ • . :;4``~
rear: 20'
Pd/A y = A.
Height, ~@'slopir,g
NlA 36 5S•
45flai
60' towor 52'
Parking: pQr T.O.V. coda Sectiort 5 shoh•terrfl
48 igpaeea In gaPege firtEl
spaces on-sile 16-26 spaces
71 psrking spaces pay.Bn-Ilcu ;
pay-in-lieu
Landscaping; 30°!0 or 7,227 sq, ft. A deQailad plan ~9,8 % Or4,78a.1; sq, ft
was to be submitted
Par DA6 approva) Loading: per T.C.V_ codb Sociion 16.52 1 berth Ej
_ 1 bereiv at drop-off aPCa
Commercial -
8q. Po0lage; 10% or 1,927 sq. R. 369b or
Sq, f4_ 4 1% oP 4;440 eq. ta.
1 },555
Common area: 350/e of allowable GRPA N/A
or 6.745 sq, ft. 38~6 or 95,30e sq. ¢q. '
~
4 : :
, ;
TON~
4VA
75 South Frontage Road ORLC
Vail, Colorado 81657 P O
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157 • ' R ' •
MEDIA ADVISORY TM
April 9, 1997 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Community Information Office
!lA0~ ~OWN C0UNCIL HIGIiLOGHTS FOR APRIL 8
Work Sesseon Braefs
Council members present: Armour, Foley, Ford, Jewett, Johnston, Kurz, Navas
--Discussion of U.S. Forest Service Control Burn
The Council heard fram Bill Vt/ood, district ranger for the VVhite River iVational Forest,
who stated the agency's intent to initiate a prescribed burn north of Bald Mountain
Road above Vail this spring wil8 be postponed a year--possibly longer--until the
prescribed conditions are met. The decision was based on research conducted by a
Forest Service hydrologist who determined the current snowpack melt and temperature
conditions are simiiar to 1984, which triggered debris flow probfems. In his report,
Wood said the Forest Service isn't walking away from the project. He said he's asked
his team to continue with the analysis, environmental assessment and documentation
in preparation for a prescribed burn in the future. He said the public would continue to
be involved in the decision-making process and that funding for the burn would be
retained through the Foundation for IVorth American Wild Sheep, among other sources.
Wood said the hydrologist has indicated the conditions will be suitable for the burn 6
out of every 10 years, which means the burn might not happen next year, either. In
response to a question from Michael Jewett, Wood said there are no plans for short-
term mitigation such as cutting the trees or brush by hand to improve the bighorn sheep
habitat and revegetate the aspen trees. Mayor Bob Armour said he respected and
admired the professional judgement delivered by VVood. He also thanked the Forest
Service for spending time in the community. Eve IVott, a resident in attendance at the
meeting, also congratulated Wood on the Forest Service's position. For more
information, contact Wood at 827-5715.
--Council Reports
Paul Johnston, who represents the Town Council on the Eagle County Recreationa!
Authority (which oversees the Berry Creek Fifth property in Edwards) presented an
update on the Authority's activities. First, Johnston said, an access spur will be much
less costly than originally anticipated due to its relocation to coincide with an access
point established for the North Star Lumber facility. Johnston suggested spending the
(more)
RECYCLEDPAPER
t
TOV Council Highlights/Add 1
$165,000 now to create access to the acreage. Second, Johnston said the Authority,
representing 7 governmental agencies (Vail holds the controlling interest), has
discussed the possibility of "musical parcels" ta include a series of land trades between
the Authority, Eagle County School District and the Arrowhead Metro District.
Also, Johnston said the Authority has been approached by the Beaver Creek Resort
Company to help pay for lighting and seating upgrades for the equestrian center which
_ is located on the property. The equestrian center produces weekly rodeos which have
: been very popular during the summer season, Johnston said. However, the Beaver -
Creek Resort Company is interested in extending the equestrian center's contract from
an annual agreement to a five-year contract to justify its contribution. The last
component of Johnston's report included a video tape showing development of a multi-
purpose fair grounds building in Oklahoma. Johnston said the Authority has expressed
interest in exploring the possibility of a multi-purpose facility that would tie-into the
equestrian center on the Berry Creek property. Uses could include dog shows, car
shows, antique shows, wedding receptions, meetings, conferences, etc., he said.
Authority members have been asked to poll their constituencies about the concept and
will meet again on May 1 for additional discussion. Johnston said he was encouraged
by the authority's enthusiasm, since the group has had difficulty agreeing on much of
anything since it was formed in 1991. The multi-purpose facility concept will be
discussed in more detail by the Vail Town Council at its April 22 work session.
--Other
Kevin Foley expressed concerns abaut the poor surface condition of I-70 and asked
that better signage be erected to warn motorists of the dangers. Foley also inquired
about the status of the Booth Falls rock slide victims who had contacted him about
problems they were having in returning to their condominium unit. The problems have
since been resolved and all units are now occupied except for unit 14, which received
extensive damage.
Bob Armour reported on his attendance at a send-off for outgoing PEC and DRB
members; the construction kick-off ineeting and the West Vail roundabouts kick-off
meeting.
Paul Johnston suggested better assistance, communications and coordination by
Warner Development in handling closings for the Vail Commons units. Johnston said
his experience in helping one of the new buyers during the closing was stressful and
disappointing for the homeowner.
--Vail Commons Lottery
After hearing an update on the third reserve lottery for remaining units at Vail
Commons, the Council agreed to allow the town to serve as a conduit for the sale of a,
3-bedroom unit to Mountain Valley Development Corporation of Glenwood Springs,
(more)
A
TOV Council Highlights/Add2
whose name was drawn first out of 8 applicants. The three-party closing concept had
been requested by the developer, Bobby Warner. During discussion, Town Attorney
Tom Nioorhead said the Niountain Valley Development Corporation, which helps
facilitate housing and employment for the disabled, qualifies by state and federal law as
an owner-occupant. The Vail Commons units meet all provisions of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (P?DA) and the Federal Fair Housing Act. Council members said they
looked forward to the transaction. For more information, contact Andy Knudtsen, senior
. housing policy planner, at 479-2440. ~
. --Red Sandstone Locals Housing Also yesterday, Andy Knudtsen, senior housing policy planner, provided a brief update
on the 17-unit Red Sandstone locals housing development initiated by the Eagle River
Water and Sanitation District. Knudtsen said the development, which will include five
units to be sold to Town of Vail employees, is over-budget and will be scaled back.
The adjustments will delay construction to 1998. In the meantime, he said, water
district officials are taking a tour of the Vail Commons development to gain ideas on
how to make adjustments to the Red Sandstone design. For more information, contact
Andy Knudsten in the Community Development Department at 479-2440.
--Off-Site Parking at Swiss Chalet
The Council voted 7-0 to approve a request to allow two new parking spaces for the
Swiss Chalet to be partially located on the adjoining Bavaria Haus property, owned by
Sonnenalp Properties. The action follows approval by the Planning and Environmental
Commission to approve, with six conditions, a request for three variances to allow for
an addition to the entry of the Swiss Chalet at 62 East Meadow Drive. During Council
discussion, Councilmembers Sybill IVavas and Bob Armour expressed concern about
the parking pay-in-lieu policy and suggested discussing the policy and its objectives in
more depth at a future meeting. For more information, contact Lauren Waterton in the
- Community_Development Department at 479-2454.
UPCOMING D9SCUSS80N TOPIC5
April 15 Work Session
PEC Revievv
97 Housing Vl/ork Plan
Public Works Seasonal Housing Budget
Review of Proposed Rules of Procedure
Austria Haus, Ordinance #4
April 15 Evening Meeting
Second Reading, Ordinance iVo. 4, Austria Haus
Second Reading, Ordinance IVo. 7, Elevator Inspection Fees
Second Reading, Ordinance IVo. 8, Proof of Insurance
GRFA Decision Ordinance
(more) .
~
TOV Council Highlights/Add3
April 22 Work Session
DRB Review
Lionshead Master Planning Update
Report on Vail Tomorrow Conference
Year-end Financial Report
European Tour/Slide Show on Loading & Delivery
Review Sound Ordinance
Berry Creek Fifth Multi-Purpose Buifding .
May 6 Work Session
Eagle County Housing Policies
May 6 Evening Meeting
First Reading, Sound Ordinance
# # #
.
:
ee
e4 ' .
TOWN OF ~AIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
. F0R BMNiEDIATE RE~EASE
April 8, 1997
Contact: Larry Grafel, 479-2173 Bob NicLaurin, 479-2105
Public 1lVorks Director Town Manager
Greg Hall, 390-4676 Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
Project Manager Community Information Officer
CONSTRUCTBON BEG8NS NEXT MOfNDAV FOR WEST VA9L R0UNDABOUTS
(Vail)--The Town of Vail will break ground on the Vl/est Vail roundabouts project next
Monday (4-17), contributing to one of the busiest area roadway construction seasons in
recent memory. About 50 neighborhood residents and business representatives
attended a construction kick-off ineeting yesterday (4-7) to hear more about the project.
The $5.37 million work will include roundabouts on the north and south sides of the
interchange,. a new bridge spanning Gore Creek and improved pedestrian and bicycle
_ paths. Duckle's Construction of Steamboat Springs is the project's general contractor.
Funding will be shared by the Town of Vail and the Colorado Department of
Transportation.
Larry Grafel, public works director, said this year's seven-month-long construction
project reflects numerous commitments developed by the Town in partnership with the
community. "We've maximized the construction effort to minimize the project's
duration, which is what we heard repeatedly throughout the discussions," he said. The
Town has encouraged citizen involvement throughout the project, including selection of
(more)
RECYCLEDPAPER
r
. West Vail Roundabouts/Add 1
the design and a construction sequencing schedule. The contractor will receive an
incentive for early roadway completion on or before Sept. 19, Grafel said. Otherwise,
the project is scheduled to be substantially complete by Oct. 17. Landscaping and rock
. masonry work will be completed in the spring of 1998.
Work will occur between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday, with Sunday
work as needed, according to Grafel. Evening work from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. will be
allowed on an as-needed basis. Also, night work from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. is permissible
with advance public notice. The project will provide continuous access to the
Intermountain neighborhood, Streamside area and West Vail businesses with maximum
10-minute delays, he said. An on-site traffic control supervisor has been hired to
implement the 10-minute mandate throughout the project. Also, pedestrian and bicycle
access will be maintained, as well.
Another commitment from the town is timely information. Closures, openings,
delays, detours and other conditions will be coordinated daily and disseminated through
multiple sources including variable message boards along I-70, phone recordings, fax
broadcasts, and radio and riewspaper updates.
Also, the Town will sponsor weekly citizen updates at 5:15 p.m. Mondays at the West
Vail Lodge to monitor construction impacts during the first month of the project. The
meetings will eventually be reduced to twice a month; then monthly. "We've said all
along these construction impacts will be painful," Grafel said. "We're committed to
doing what we can to be as responsive as possible to the neighborhood and the
businesses." Citizens with suggestions or concerns are asked to contact proje.ct
manager Greg Hall, the town's engineer. Hall's cell phone, 390-4676, will be accessible
(more)
v
West Vail Roundabouts/Add 2
from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday. Or leave a message between 6 p.m.
and 8 a.m. by calling 479-2160.
IVext Monday's construction will see the immediate closure of Chamonix Road from
IVorth Frontage Road to Chamonix Lane on the intersection's north side. The closure
will last through May 31. Motorists will be directed to use Chamonix Lane and Buffehr Creek Road as detour routes. All other roadways, including the I-70 ramps, will remain
open next week with minimal delays. However, there could be up to 10-minute delays
at access points on the iVorth Frontage Road, according to Grafel.
The most significant impact for motorists will occur in May when the underpass
between the iVorth and South frontage roads will be closed for the month. Specific I-70
ramp closures on the south side also will occur during May with advance public notice.
The project wilf involve the coordination of eight or more subcontractors and six utility
companies. Also, numerous agencies are involved, including the Colorado Department
of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Eagle County, Colorado Department of Health and Colorado Division of Wildlife.
During yester.day's construction kick-off, Mayor Bob Armour, a resident of the West
Vail neighborhood, asked for the public's patience this summer. He acknowledged the
many difficulties motorists will have this summer due to the multiple projects. That work
includes completion of the Dowd Junction bike path; additional frontage road
improvements near Safeway and City Market in Vail; overlays of the frontage roads in
Vail; roundabouts in Avon; Highway 6 widening between Dowd Junction and Eagle-Vail;
and I-70 overlays between Wolcott and Eagle-Vail.
The town will host a follow-up construction impact meeting at 5:15 p.m. next Monday
at the VVest Vail Lodge to assess the project's first day of construction.
# # #
West VaiB Interchange Roundabouts
- Construction Begins Monday, April 14! ; Minimize Your Impacts by Knowing Vl/hat's Ahead
Construction Planning Meetings for Project Evaluation and Adjustment
Help monitor the construction impacts!
_ Monday, April 14 Monday, April 21 Monday, April 28 .
. 5:15 p.m. 5:15 p.m. 5:15 p.m. . West Vail Lodge West Vail Lodge West Vail Lodge Here's What's Happening...
Over the next seven months, the West Vail Interchange will be reconstructed to
improve safety, congestion and delays. This citizen-approved design will include
roundabouts on the north and south sides of the interchange, a new bridge spanning
Gore Creek and improved pedestrian and bicycle paths. Construction impacts will be
numerous, including detours, dust, delays, congestion, noise, bus service adjustments,
changes in pedestrian and bikeways and interruptions in utility service. To help minimize the impacts, you've asked for timely construction updates throughout the
project to make your travels a little less frustrating:
• Radio
KTUN 95.3/101.5 FM Daily traffic reports
KZYR 103.1 FM Daily traffic reports
KSKE 104.7 FM Daily traffic reports
• Television
Channel 5 Daily updates
TV 8 KVBA Daily updates as needed Newspaper
Vail Daily Daily updates
Also, look for weekly updates in the Vail Valley Times and Vail Trail.
Fax Broadcast Timely fax updates to your home or office.
. • Recorded Information Round-the-clock recorded updates on closures and
delays. Phone number TBA.
• On Site
Variable message signs ,
Regularly scheduled community roundtable meetings for construction
adjustments.
Construction Contacts...
• Project Manager, Town of Vail
Greg Hall, Town Engineer, (970) 390-4676 (8 a.m. to 7 p.m.);
(970) 479-2160 after hours
Public Works Administration Offices, 479-2159, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
• General Contractor, Duckle's Construction, Steamboat Springs
Todd MacFarlane, Project Manager, (970) 846-4303
• Project Inspector, MK Centennial, Glenwood Springs
Bart Neccessary, Inspector, (970) 928-8599
• For emergencies after hours, call Vail Police Dispatch at (970) 479-2200
a
West /Vaal Constructaon Commitments from Town of Vaa@...
0 Maximized construction effort to minimize project duration
0 Work will occur between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday with
Sunday work as needed
0 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. evening work may be needed at times
0 iVight work from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. is permissible with advance public notice
0 Holiday work is permissible Memorial Day weekend
0 Holiday work is prohibited Fourth of July and Labor Day weekends
0 10-minute maximum delays for motorists 0 On-site traffic control supervisor
0 Minimal noise disruptions from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.
0 Timely updates and information provided by Town of Vail
0 24-hour access for safety and emergency vehicles
0 Continuous access to Intermountain, Streamside and VVest Vail businesses with
maximum 10-minute delays
0 Continuous access for pedestrians and cyclists (please use caution)
0 Staging areas at Stephens and Donovan parks, west end of IVorth Frontage
Road, plus other possible sites
0 Contractor incentive for early roadway completion on or before Sept. 19
0 Timely responses to your suggestions and concerns
Here's What $o Expect Do.arang Aprel...
North Side
0 Chamonix Road closure. Effective 7 a.m. Monday, April 14, Chamonix Road
from North Frontage Road to Chamonix Lane will be closec9 through IVlay 31.
Use Chamonix Lane and Buffehr Creek Road as detoaarr routes.
0 I-70 westbound ramp work. Ramps will be open, but expect minimal delays.
0 North Frontage Road sewer line installation from Wendy's to West Vail Lodge.
Frontage Road will be open, but expect minimal delays, including 10-minute
delays at access points.
~ Best time to access VVest Vail will be before 7 a.m. and after 7 p.m. However,
the area will remain fully accessible with 10-minute maximum delays. Use I-70
exit 173 or fVorth Frontage Road.
0 Town of Vail bus service will operate its current north-south loop through April
20. Summer bus service begins April 21 with hourly service on the outlying
routes.
Sou$h Sode
0 I-70 eastbound ramp work. Ramps will be open, but expect minimal delays.
0 Pile driving for ramp retaining walls (last week in April). This will be noisy from 7
a.m. to 7 p.m. Ramps will be open, but expect 10-minute delays.
0 Set abutements for temporary bridge at Gore Creek (last week in April).
0 Best time to access Vllest Vail will be before 7 a.m. and after 7 p.m. However,
the area will remain fully accessible with 10-minute maximum delays. Use I-70
exit 173 or South Frontage Road.
0 Town of Vail bus service will operate its current north-south loop through April
20. Summer bus service begins April 21 with hourly service on the outlying
routes.
Printed by Anne Wright 4/09/97 4:11pm
From: Anne Wright
To: EVERYONE GROUP
Subject: Annual TOV Employee Breakfast
Its that time of year again! The
employee breakfast will be held on
Thursday, April 17th at Seasons at the
Green (vail Golf Course) from 7:00 a.m.
to 9:00 a.m.
Your department directors will be
cooking breakfast for you (they have to
be there at 5:30 a.m. HA HA HA HA!11)
so don't miss it.
Page: 1
EAL
ESTATE
1FORBES
GROUP
Michael L. Smith
26 Avondale Lane ° Suite 136C
Beaver Cree}za Resort
P.O. Box 5110
Avon, CO 81620
Office: 970/845-0400
Fax: 970/476-4747
Home: 970/476-5254
Mobile: 970/471-0939
. .
Aprcfl Y09 1997
Vail Town Council Mem6ers
Tammy Williamson
Tom Moorhead
We are crgftin$ this letter protesting the very
bright lights Installed at the West Vail Ynn last
fall,
'tJe understand these lighics are in violation of Town
of Vail regulations and9 franklyn wonder why they
have not been turned off or replaced by less offen=
sive lighting.
We are concerned that a precedent will be set and
that others will feel they can go ahead and vfolate
TOV regs and then fight wfth the Town latern possibly
getting away wfth onYy pmying a fine,
West Vail wanted to be annexed to the Town just to
avoid this kind of problemo We'are starting to look
like Colfax Avenue8fl
sp~ce
~
KariG~~`n Scheidegger 476=8254
Mary .To Allen 476=5894
OL)Let•-_- Bruce H a A l len
Michael L. Smitch
~
~
a~i 3 ~ Ch Q"P7~~~ -~~~x
C D. s^ ~ t1411-CIO :
y~~- ~a Sy tb -~7,(7
e4
TOWN OF UAIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Anorney
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2107/Fax 970-479-2157
April 10, 1997
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Helen Fritch
President of the Board
The Vail Alpine Garden
183 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Alpine Garden Lease
Dear Helen:
Enclosed is a lease and license Agreement for the Alpine Garden and the Alpine Garden Display.
This is for a term of 49 years. Please review the document and if it is acceptable to you, please
return three originally executed copies for execution by the Town Manager. I will then return a fully
executed copy to you. The exhibits are being prepared by Todd Oppenheimer
At the same time I am working on an agreement for a lease for the proposed education center.
Council has given me authority to proposed a 49 year agreement for the properry off of Vail Valley
Drive where the surface parking is presently located adjacent to the soccer field. -
This agreement will offer immediate access to the property but will not provide exclusive possession
until such time as a building permit has been issued. In the interim the continued use of the property _
as a parking lot is appropriate. There will be no action taken which would interfere with exclusive
possession by the Foundation at such time as all approvals have been received.
This agreement, which will be contingent upon receiving the necessary approvals, should also have
a definite time frame within which the Foundation will know whether or not it will be. moving
forward with the project. Please advise me of the period of time that you believe is sufficient.
The document should contain a provision for reporting to Town Council the status of the
Foundation's efforts to raise funds and thereby be in a position to move forward with the project.
As stated in Bob McLaurin's letter to you of December 27, 1996, establishing the intention of the
RECYCLED PAPER
- . _ . _ _~....._.'.~.~....,_i..~_ _..:.`.w.:-.__:....=:.a...._~_..:.__:.a._.:.._:, " _
Town of Vail to enter into a long term lease, the Town Council remains excited about this project
and looks forward to the location of the education center at the newly proposed site.
Very truly yours,
. • ,i%~
R. Thomas Moorhead -
Town Attorney
RTM/aw
xc: Vail Town Council
Robert W. McLaurin
Pamela A. Brandmeyer
Todd Oppenheimer (w/enclosure)
i
~
SENT BY:JACK MORTON COINPANY ; 4-10-97 ; 3:37PM ; MAIN FAX J MORTON- 3034792157;# 2/ 2
Wgn.IAAM I.l~i~~ar~~v
lOprii 70v 1997
.Mayoa 130h Armour ancj 1 owrt Lcuncil Memhers
'I'own of Vai! '
75 S. Frontage Roacf
Vai l, C:0 8 ! 657
' Desu' Mayor Armc~ur & Town Counci i 1V1em bers:
As an owner in the NUIl creek building for the past seven years and one Lhat
vueLcUrtles progress and the re`;ponyih.te impr.oveinents in Vail, l write you t
~Orning with gr.eat eoncerns abc~ut tllc Sonlienalp Austrla 9-iaus. H
in
watchetl the process of SDD, I would scate withi~ut any tt;5ervations tavhatglhis
potenliil develogmertC has fiu• exceeded responsible plar,ning and good
yudgemcnt. ~
j'm riot enough involved in the day-to-clay fullowingy Uf ihc'I'owJi CUUnciJ, yet
l iedtevr that uur goals of "responsthility" are probably in alignment. 1VIy
incluiation, as I review tiiis proposed bu.ilding, is that tt is tio much l:u~
tp~e curren.t one tliat it potentially s~ak5 oF a ctomino eff~;~.t that could continuc
ehroughout the entire vpolage and, ui[imate)y, destroy its intimacy and charm.
I urge your uespwnsfble considcratiou as we a[i have desie-e for responsibility ana
g()al of maintaining the u2tegrity and qtiality of Vai1. Beyoud the , I
believc kIiak the SI~D is countes Productive to thc bes Elustria f{au.S
t interests of i/a,1,
Sincerely, ~
' William Morton
VV1V1/bj
3Il FA 9 L 479-2 .97 . .
r ,
~ Friday, April 1 l , 1
997
~ ~y
~ e:~M:W - • ;~-f '
~
. 'SECTION C . . , , ? .
THE DENVER POST
. : .
.c, r . .
: . . . . y . , . .
p,
~
s;na~
. . , , . ' .y. , ; . , .n ,J~ .i~.;~ .~r~: ,l ~~i y
* 'p ' , ~ • r • ~ ~
• •
~ • ' . • . t~ . skiin
\ ' y C~
v v ght 11 te t i
. i, i .
By Dan Sullivan ' 1( y~ ~ ly~ ~°y~ y~eXt ,w modntain right
~o6.i1A~111 ll now."
Special to The Denver Post Lightin t~~l?~ ~11 e~k Adventure Ridge, at the top of Vail Associates will conduct. g • . • , the gondola, iacludes a skating ~ c? ~lightintests on Vail Mountain. • ' 'rink,11 snow thabtoardcan h bealf- used pipe a at i?d ni ht.tub-,
skung,,and we think there are tre- directed the ski company_ to get ' Ozawa said `Forest Seivice, ,
negt Friday to esplore the possi- mendous benefits in providing it." specific about its plans and to wildlife biologists concurred with • g g
bility of night skiing, company of=' , ~.Vail officials set'natarget date
ficials announced Thur§day. • '~hough Vail hasn't submitted a seek'public input, Ozawa said: • Thom p§on § findfn gs -which'are. t• .
- :,i • on lighting.ruris at''Vail, saying
- "The purpose of the testing is to construction plan to the Forest In June, at the direction of the under revision. ' that would depend,on public input.
measure the amount of illumina= , Service for installing lights, the is- Forest Service, Vail hired an inde- The initial proposal; included"°Ii,;and when night skiing occurs, f t
tion created and, most important- sue has been discussed for some pendent wildlife biologist to as- lighting iuns under chair 8, chair Vail would join Keystone, Howel-
ly, begin the process of soliciting time. . ' ' sess potential environmental im- 9, chair 26 'and the gondola, all , son Hill and .Eldora as the only
public input and dialogue with the . "I know the Vail guys have pacts related to night skung above above Lionshead. Colorado ski 'resorts that provide ;
community," said Paul Teswuide, thought about night skiing for sev- Lionshead. "The proposal has changed con- - that amenity.
Vail vice president of mountain eral years, but they never gave.a "The night . skiing proposal siderably," Thompson said. "Since ` Officials at Vail,said the ski
operations. . ~ formal proposal," said Dave Oza- would not result in any significant I prepared the document last company's cunent night ski ter-
'"For years, guests, the commu- wa, snow ranger for the Holy impacts to the wildlife. communi- year, Adventure Ridge went in: rain proposals would be made
~ nity aad Vail business merchants Cross Ranger District. , ty," Rick Thompson's report con- There's a considerable amount of -.public negt Friday, along with .t
. have suggested the.idea of night Last spring, the Forest Service cluded. human activity that occurs.on the Thompson's latest findings . Z
. , . . - . . - . , . . . T . ' Z~j
' Q .
TlH[EN]EW WES'g'/. by Patracia Nelson Limer-ack ,
T sm -may - .
o ~
not e great9 ut lt°beats t
. .t
, .
, . : . . .
. - , ~
. the summer of 1970, I did comes to understanding the `ISYI't a bit oAl ~I have," said one resident, hosen, but wearing silly clothes,.
IN some intense ersonal frustrations of the seivice 'obs _ - ~ ane
~ p 1 "some real reservations about not to mention maids' uni-, ~
research on oneof ttie attached to tourist economies, , b~"ZG-a braG a Small going Bavarian" forms, may be a necessary price':•,•
hottest topics in the West the summer of 1970 gave me a ptice to pay coynpared "So you have some reserva- to pay for an escape from the today: the prices paid for, the permanent intellectual and psy- tfons'about "going,Bavarian,'" . environmental injury and eco-
benefits of tourism. chological advantage. : to tbose :earlier, pl°ices. ;
• . , one wants to say; ".Would you,, nomic instability, represented ,
I was going to schooil1n Santa . My employer at the St. 0 ~!C~ raZn' have any reservauons about : by the town's old smelter. ~
f • •
Cruz, Calif.; a tourist town long ' Charles Motel made me wear a~ ~ ~ . going back_to miriuig and Tourism presents urgen tpuz-
f,~
de O~estation a ; before it became a university white uniform,witti white : ~ -.smelting?:Isn't-a bit.ofAlpine zles and conflicts that make the ' town. Bordering on the beach stockingl, and white shoes and '~ICIZCCdI BGOYIO~?ZZC bric-a-brac a small price to pay head spin. In hopes of pooling •and boardwalk was a jumble of a white kerchief. With that cos- • compared to those earlier our understanding and figuring - '
'4rB.SSZO~Z.S?
: 'motels, the best hunting ground tume, in a blizzard in Colorado, prices of acidraiii, pollution, out these riddles together, the. •
for summer jobs. So I became a I would have been invisible. But • side of this divide, playing the deforestation,:and cyclical eco- Center of the Amedcan West at •:•i"
maid• at the 5t. Charles 1VYote1. In in the summer in Santa Cruz, I role of the tourist, not the . •.~nomic depressions?" ~ . . the. University of Colorado will
•truth, this proved to be an , was very visible indeed - virtu- toured-upon. We are, most of us, That is the central quesdon - hold a conference on -1VYay, 1.' '
indoor version of stoop labor: - allyACentral Casting's archetype impure in these matters, eager, . ,presented by. Westem tourism: and 2; with,~approprlately, an
stooping to strip tieds, stooping ofThe Maid.. • to tour arid equally eager to., Given.the economic.troubles opening tour. onApril•,30.With ,
-to make beds, stooping tovaau- • Ttus'visibility . gayt me one of condemn those-other toutists affllcting xnining, logging, ranch- a keynote address (°Why.I Love
um, stooping to clean toilets,' my few occupational satisfac= - who jam the roadsand genera(-: ipg;.and=Farmung,.doesn't the :Tourlsts") by New Mexico .
: and scrub tubs I was only,:19> dons. Every day, I would take °ly annoy - by doing euactly ; t d'irection of developmerit. point, wdter Rudolfo Anaya, "Seeing
~ but+every evenuig my back hurt,my sack lunch down,'to the what-we are doin g.- . to w a r d t o u r i s m? E g t r a c tiv e.~ ' . and B e i ng S e e n: T o u r i s m i n t h e
azid I•felt like a zombie. Boardwalk along the.beaclif' ' When the town of Kellogg, '.industries have;provided a.. American
West",will bring '
~ F,:-.:~.:;.- . • , , ,i
, At the'end .of the 'day,`ttie one;.~` -Tlien I would plant`myself on a, Idaho, devastated. by~theco1- treacherous foundauon: for per- together tourism's advocates
point of clarity in my head was bench, among theeswirl of ;lapse of the.mining; smelting, , manent and stable communi- and critics. Registration for the my feeling, towazd tourists: tourists lining up for the roller , and timber industri es, made a ties: If. one,looks'for; an alterna-~ conference is $30, and: $10 for
. . t,
• When the motel-guests had •-roaster and the carousel: Ina recent decision to place its tive, the road seems to lead to senior citizens over 65; the tour ~
~ eaten potato, chips.in their ' manner ceminiscent of Edgar, i hopes on the tourist trade, the 'tourism, to the'prese.rvadon is $25. For information, call the.~
: rooms and.ground'some ofrA?• Allen Poe's reproactifiilraven• ? townspeople decided there, and publicizing ofdocal natuial center at 4924 879.~
chose,potato ctiips into .the; rug, °(though oppcisite in.color), I' k were already too many "Old and •cultural t~esources as a per- - Pcstrtcica IVelsora limerlck i.s
t~a . .
~ y quite radiacit(y cleaz would iiiake this urimisfakable : WesY',tourist towns.:So they: manent attraction.for visitors. ea, bistory professor aE CU- ~
feelings about tourists:Thus,• '
;F nonverbal statement )"Your ,fun chose, instead; to adopt the .
with deep pockets. By this Boulder,and ro-clbair of tbe
when it ~omes tp unders~d„~ i _ ~n,my, ~ork ° image of "Old Bayanan.:. . ; , thinkuig, ihe,tesidents of , - ; ~ii~ ojtbe ~Rsis~~a 9~esL . $
. mg.the atttni-es of local~ _ . . . . . .
. , , • . ~ ~knd-yet, at many„qther tunes Understandabty, noreveryone Kellogg:may come to feel a lit-: . Sbe sa»v~Ades tbe,J~rst g~a~,g~•of .
A . towards tounsts, and wlien ic in hfe, I had been on the other was enthusiasUc x. t , ~ de goofy in-pinafores and: leder:: a[se srson8~r isa Ereipis,e. ~
• . . . . . -.?r""`,~,: ~'~?~'r :.:v;-,..,,,. t ..~-,,,s.,? .
4VAIL @f~EST ~l~~I~ 9NTERCHA?IVCiE RO~JIVDe4BOl~TS
TO~1 OCONsTRuCTsoN ADVIsoRY
FOR: MONDAV, APR@L 14
Closures and Detours
0 Beginning at 7 a.m., Charnonix Road from IVorth Frontage Road to
Chamonix Lane w010 be CLOSED through May 31. Use Chamonix Lane
and Buffehr Creek to access West Vail neighborhoods to the north. ,
Dela1ls .
. 0 All I-70 ramps will be open; expect minimal delays.
0 fVorth and South Frontage Roads will be open; expect minimal delays and
up to 10-minute delays at access points on North Frontage Road.
BeSt T91'lle t0 Q?CC@SS WeS$ Va9B
0 Before 7 a.m. and after 7 p.m. However, the area will remain fully
accessible with 10-minute 9VIAXIIVIl9BVl delays.
Bus Service
0 Town of Vail bus service regular north-south loop through April 20.
To Report a Probleava or Concern
0 Call Greg Hall, project manager, 390-4676 (8 a.m. to 6 p.m. M-F).
0 For emergencies after hours, call Vail Dispatch 479-2200.
Cifizen Monitorinq and Evaluation
a 5:15 p.m., Monday, April 14, West Vail Lodge
Lookinq Ahead
0 Closure of I-70 underpass (Chamonix Road between North and South
Frontage Roads) for entire month of May.
0 Specific I-70 ramp closures (south side only) in May.
Proiect Comple4ion
0 Oct. 17 with contractor incentives for roadway completion Sept. 19.
West Vail Construction Commi4men4s from 4he Town of Vail
_ 10-minute maximum delays for motorists.
On-site traffic control supervisor.. .
- 0 24-hour access for safety and emergency vehicles.
0 Continuous access to Intermountain, Streamside and West Vail businesses with
maximum 10-minute delays.
0 Continuous access for pedestrians and cyclists (please use caution).
o 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday-Saturday construction with Sunday work as needed.
7 p.m. to 10 p.m. evening work as needed.
Night work from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. permissible with advance public notice.
Minimal noise disruptions from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.
Timely updates and information provided by Town of Vaif.
Onformation Hot96nes
0 West Vail Roundabouts, 479-2199
0 Highway 61IVidening, 748-0554
0 Avon Roundabouts, 748-0000
To add your name and fax number to this daily broadcast service, call 479-2115.
~:APR 11 '9~ 1b~1~I-;Pl r.1
.
' •.1":
;
Vaill IssociateN, Inca
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
,°~s
FOR IM1ti1EDTATE RELEASE
" Media contacts:
Rob Perlman (970) 845-572I
Paul Witt (970) 845-5720
845-5722
at Peeples (970)
z'•.~~~:
VAIL ASSOCIATES TO TEST LIGH'TS QN VAM OU~~iTAIN
_'E~~"'{'•1~!`
'.•s- VAIL, Colo. Apnl 10, 1997 - Vail Associates will conduct a light tesi on Vail Mountain
- , - .
' Y'Friday, Apnl 18, 1997, to explore the possibility of night skiing, Paul Testvvuide, vice
president of mountain operations for Vail Associates, announced today. The Vai1 Vailey
community is invited to participate in the testing which will begin Friday evenin.g at 7:00 p.m.
•i1.,.{,k ~T' R~ in the Wildwood West Room at the Lion Square Lodgo in Lionshead,
, •ti
~ •
"The purpose of the testing is to measure the amount of illumination created and, most
?t~ <<."./. 1
importantly, begin the process of soliciting public input and scartiag a dialogue with the
comtnunity," said Testtivuide. "For yeazs guests, the community and Vail business merchants
Savng rhe
havc suggested the idea of n.ight sk.iing and we think there a.*e tremendous benefits in
providing it." •
,
1~~'cr) .rS~i!
Testwuide outlined some of the advantages in offering nigbt skiing on Vail Mountain which
are listed below:
•
Night slding offers added value for those guests who arrive in the afternoon and want to
warm up and ac:.limate to the mountains prior to spending a full day on the mountain;
' o Night skiing offers flexibility for day visitors, particularly those from the Front Range,
~tbecause they would have the freedom to travel during non-peak times and could stagger
. a
their travel scheduies, kncwing they could sici during non-traditional times. Has the
potential to reduce traffic at peak times;
1,,I 'Jci, ~o youth programs and race training schedules can be accommodated better at night with a
safe, healthy and fun environment;
o Residents with day jobs have the opportuniry to ski/snowboard at night and flexibility in
• determinizig when they want to sld/snowboard;
,i.
. , -more-
i., ?0 Box 7• Vail, Colorado • 31658 • phone 970 845 5720 • fax 970 845 5728 • e-mall: vallpr@vall.nec
.t
•n
LIGHT TESTING
2-2-2
Adva.ntages of night skiing cantinued;
o Guests have the oppominity to spend more time on the mountain, one of the main reasons they
cboose the Va.il Valley as their vacation destinstion;
• Night skiing would drive business in the upper end of the Vai1 Valley because ii energizes the town
and gives guests an additional reason ta spend ti.me there;
s Similar to Howelson Hi11 in Steamboat, n%ght skiing-provides an additional nighttime time activity
for locai community;
On Friday evening, the t.esting will begin with a brief introduction of two consultants who are working
with Vail Associates to develop a state-of-the-art night lighting system: Nancy Clanton, of Clanton
Engineering, Inc. from Boulder and Rick Thompson of Western EcoSystems, Inc. also from Boulder.
Clanton is a director of the International Dark Sky Society, an organization whose goal is to reduce the
amount cf light pollution, and is expert in designing quality lighting and illumination systems while
Thompson is a leading expert of wildlife and environmental issues as it relates to night skiing,
After the introducrions, Vail Associates will take patticipants to several different vantage points
througlwut the town for different pezspective9 on the lighting and then return to the Lion Square Lodge
for a facilitated discussion on the possibility of night skiing.
"We are also extremely aware of the environmental sensitivities associated with night skiing,"
commcntcd Testwuide, ""Ihe proposed system would use a 38% lower wattage bulb than the typical
400 watt cell used in other night skiing operations and the lights are designed to imitate the spectrum
of moonlight, making it easier for eyes to a.djust while providing the minimvm amount of light needed
for niaPub slding.
Vail Associates has informed the United States Forest Service of the t.esting but has not submitted a
formal proposal for installation at this tune. The results oi this test would be used to develop a final
proposal to the USFS and other governmental agencies, if neces9ary.
Anyone interested in participating in the initial light test should meet at the Lion Square Lodge at 7:00
p.m. on Friday, April 18, 1997. Please dress warm]y and wear winter sYtoes.
TALKING POINTS FOR NIGHT SKIING ON VAIL NiOUNTAIN
Vai! Associates is exploring the possibilities of night skiing on Vail Mountain, a project that has great
opportunities for both residents and visitors alike. Just as Adventure Ridge has proved to be very
successful at providing fun activities for children, teens and adults, night skiing woultl be an extension of
the already well received line-up of activities. Through working with our neighbors in the valley, we want to
make this project a success for youth, local workforce, down-valley residents and our guests.
BENEFITS OF NIGHT SKIING TO THE COMMUNITY
Nighttime activities for the local Communitv: Skiing is a large part of why people have chosen the
mountain lifestyle. With many Vail Valley residents working more than one job or working during the day,
this improvement would allow working locals to have the opportunity to enjoy skiing when it is convenient
for them. Night skiing would offer an alternative nighttime activity that is healthy and fun and would be a
real benefit for locals.
Feedback in employee focus groups has indicated strong support for night skiing. Employees expressed
support for the flexibility that night skiing woultl provide in work and recreation schedules. On days off,
participants said they could sleep late, start their ski day at noon or later and be able to ski a full day.
Youth Activities: Night skiing on Vail Mountain would provide a healthy activity for children and teens in a
safe environment. Free instruction for local school children on a weekly basis, including rentals and lift
tickets, will introduce skiing to them and offer an opportunity to advance in the sport. Similar to Howelson
Hill in Steamboat, night operations would also include race training and technical development. Night
training on Vail Mountain would encourage youth to continue to pursue skiing in a competitive
environment. Additionally, organized ski and snowboard programs would be created for disadvantaged
youth focusing on fostering individual development and a sense of achievement.
Drive Business to Vail: Adventure Ridge which has proven successful at bringing people to Lionshead at
night, similarly night skiing should drive business to both Vail Village and Lionshead.
Flexibility for Front Range Skiers: Day visitors to Vail, particularly from the front range, would be able to
avoid the I-70 morning and afternoon rush by arriving later and skiing into the evening. Night skiing would
provide Vail a competitive advantage, enabling day skiers to avoid traffic congestion between Vail and
Denver.
Added Value for Destination Guests: Night skiing would be an added value for destination guests who
arrive in the attemoon. On that f rst night, visitors may choose to 'whet their skiing appetite' in a few hours
in the evening on the mountain.
Travel Pattems: Night skiing will create more flexibifity in guests and residents' travel schedules to, from
and within Vail. Not only will night skiing encourage people to stay in town later into the night, but will
increase evening visits to Vail. Night skiing should also reduce the peak loading times on the local bus
systems both morning and afternoon, by inviting bus ridership at non-traditional times, therefore staggering
local traffic patterns.
Awareness of the Environment:
~ Vail is working with the most sophisticated, sensitive technology in the field of illumination in an effort
to create a state-of-the-art lighting faciiity for night skiing.
It is anticipated that current skier traffic on the mountain will be better spread out with the addition of
night skiing.
Wildlife studies have been completed on Game Creek Club, Adventure Ridge at Eagle's Nest and
other projects in this area, indicating no significant impacts on wildlife. Additional studies have been
conducted on the proposed light source, concluding that impact is insignificant or non-existent.
~ Vehicular traffic for skiers accessing and departing the mountain will be staggered, reducing
congestion on local roads and I-70.
~ 7he Gondola currently operates at night. Therefore, Night skiing will not alter Gondola operations.
revised 4/11 /97
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 14, 1997
SUBJECT: An appeal of a staff denial of the outdoor ski storage, located adjacent to the
Gondofa Building/Tract D, Vaii Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Appeliant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
Planner: Lauren Waterton
1. SUiJECT PROPEFtT'V
The ski storage is located outside the Gondola Building, at 600 Lionshead Mall, Tract D, Vail
Lionshead 1 st Filing.
11. STANDING OF APPELLANT
Staff believes the appellant has standing to file an appeal in this case as the appellant, Vail
Associates, is the owner of the property and operator of the ski storage.
III. BACKGROUND
On February 10, 1997, Vail Associates, Inc., submitted an application to the Town of Vail for
Design Review Board approval to allow outdoor ski storage near the Gondola Building in
Lionshead. Upon review of the permitted uses within Commercial Core II, staff determined that
outdoor ski storage is not a permitted use within this zone district. According to Section
18.06.020(B) Permitted Uses, any use listed is determined to be an exclusive use of that district
and any use not specifically permitted, is prohibited. In Commercial Core II (CCII), zoning is also
differentiated according to level of building. A use permitted within the first level, is prohibited in
other levels, unless specifically listed as a permitted or conditional use on other levels.
fndoor and outdoor ski storage is listed as a permitted use only within the Ski 8ase/Recreation
zone district, and commercial ski storage is listed as a permitted use within the basement level of
buildings in the CCII zone district. Staff denied the applicanYs request because the outdoor ski
storage use does not comply with the CCII zone district.
IV. NAT'IDRE OF T9iE APPEAL
The appellant is appealing the staff decision to deny the use of ski storage in this location. The
appellant has indicated that he believes the ski racks are a legal non-conforming use, and should
therefore, be allowed to continue. On October 7, 1987, Vail Associates received Design Rsview
Board approval for seasonal unstructured metal ski racks at the Lionshead Gondola Building (see
attachecl photo). In 1989, the Town approved a minor modification to the ski racks. In 1996, the
1 ,
_~11p~.
TOWN OF VAlL 1
metal ski racks were removed and replaced with plywood sided wood sheds with ski racks inside (see attached photo).
In 1987, staff determined that the outdoor ski racks were a permitted use, and a request for ski
storage was approved by the Design Review Board. Because these unstructured, metal racks
are not aliowed under the zoning regulations currently in place', these ski storage racks were
considered a legal nonconforming use. Section 18.64.010 (Nonconforming Sites, Uses,
Structures and Site Improvements), identifies the purpose of this chapter:
"is intended to limit the number and extent of nonconforming uses and structures by
prohibiting or limiting their enlargement, their reestablishment after abandonment, and
their restoration after substantial destruction. While permitting nonconforming uses,
structures and improvements to continue, this chapter is intended to limit enlargement,
alteration, restoration or replacement which would increase the discrepancy between
existing conditions and the development standards prescribed by this title."
The appellant has stated that he believes that the racks have not been substantially changed and
therefore, remains a legal, nonconforming structure/use. The original approval in 1987,
permitted a totai of 10 metal ski racks near the Gondola Building (see attached photo). Currently,
there are 14 sheds containing ski storage, close to the Gondola Building. Staff denied the
request because it is staff's opinion that the ski storage has been substantially altered and
enlarged, resuiting in the loss of its nonconforming status.
The appellant has aiso stated that he believes that the ski storage, as existing, is below grade,
- because the first level of the Gondola Building is substantially below grade on the north side, and
portions of the east and west sides. Furthermore, the appellant states that the ski storage racks
are within a structure, and accordingly, permitted in CCII.
Staff believes that the ski storage is cleariy outside the Gondola Buiiding, and therefore, the
grade around the building is irrelevant. Furthermore, should this be considered a building, it is on
the first floor of the building, and ski storage is not permitted on first floor of a building in CCII.
Also, it should be noted that these structures were all installed without the benefit of staff
approval or a building permit.
V. REQUIRED ACTION
Uphold/Overturn/IVlodify the staff's denial of the request for approval of outdoor ski storage.
The Planning and Environmental Commission is required to make findings of fact in accordance
with Section 18.66.030 (5) shown below:
5. Findings. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall on all appeals
make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented
to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and
conditions imposed by the requirements of this title have or have not been met.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends tFiat the Planning and Environmental Commission uphold the staff's denial of
the outdoor ski storage and recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission
make the following findings:
2
, . ir- ..i. . -
. . 0
1. That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 18
(Zoning) have not been met.
2. That the ski storage use has been substantially altered and enlarged and is no
longer a legal nonconforming use.
3. That the installation of these structures is in violation of the zoning code.
F :\everyon e\pac\me mo\skistore.414
3
i , . , 4 • Vail Associates, Inc. :LL~ MAR 1 4 1997
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~}c`i r t;..,. ' . . . .
HAND DELIVERED ~
~
Ms. Susan Connelly
Director of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road West
` Vail, CO 81657
March 14, 1997
NOTICE OF APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL 2126197 OF VAfL ASSOCIATES, INC.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION DATED 2110197;
DETERMINATION MADE FINAL 315/97
Dear Susan:
This letter is sent in connection with section H of the staff action Appeals Form.
DECISlON BEING APPEALED
On 2/26/97, Staff denied an appiication by Vail Associates, Inc. for Design Review of
ski storage facilities located on Vail Associates, Inc, property in Lionshead. The
OwncrsandOperatorso/ reasons are cited in a letter from Lauren Waterton dated 2/26/97. Untler section
Vail, Beaver Creek°D Resort
and Arrowhead Mountain'" 18.66.030 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, such determination became final on
3/5/97.
We respectfully disagree with the staff denial of this application and appeal that
decision to the Planning and Environmental Commission pursuant to section
18.66,030.6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
REASON FOR APPEAL
On October 7, 1987, Vail Associates, lnc. received Design Review Board approval for
seasonal ski racks at the Lionshead Gondola Building and at other locations. Certain
1987 DRB documents are attached for reference and incorporated herein. At that
time, zoning in CCI and CCII allowed the use in the above zone districts.
Subsequently, in 1989, the zoning was changed to allow for commercial ski storage
only in the basement or garden levels within a structure. The basement or garden
level is that floor of a building that is entirely or substantially below gratle.
~
1999 W00.LD ALPINE
$KI CIUMPIONSIIIPS
YAILIIfAVEICIEE[
c o, 0 o 0 PO Box 7• Vail, Colorado • 81658 • phone 970 476 5601
Please be aware that the Lionshead Gondola Building has multiple gratle levels. In
fact the level containing the existing ski storage is entirely or substantia(ly below
grades on the east, north and west sides of the builtling. Additionally, we contend that
the existing ski storage racks are within a structure and, therefore, are a permitted use
under the current CCII zoning.
In fhe alternative, if the PEC disagrees with the above interpretation, our position is
" that the existing ski storage is a legal non-conforming use under Chapter 18.64 of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code. The wintertime use of ski racks on this site has
continued each ski season since approved in 1987. Further, as it is unclear precisely
. what area the ski racks occupied when the zoning code was amended in 1989, we
contend that the Staff has improperly and arbitrarily determined the current ski racks
to have been enlarged.
Regarding the zoning change in 1989 which addressed commercial ski storage in CCI
& CCII, we obviously find this an important matter and would have opposetl any code
change had we been aware of it at the time. Oufside ski storage is common at ski
areas, including Winter Park, Keystone, Vail, Beaver Creek and Arrowhead, to name a
few examples.
In summary, we believe Staff is in error regarding its conclusion that the Vail
Associates' ski storage facilities in Lionshead are in violation of the zoning code as
stated in letters to me dated 12130/96 and 2/26/97.
Please let me know when we can discuss this appeal with the PEC.
Sincerely,
VAI SSOCIATES, INC.
L
oe Macy ~
Manager, Go~er mental Affairs
attachments:
(1) Appeals Form dated 3/14197
(2) DRB approval dated 9 0/7/87
(3) DRB agenda form dated 10/7/87
cc: Jim Mandel, Lauren Waterton, Tom Moorhead, Chris Ryman
~
~~.~Y,.p~ fl r 'f~~•~~~'k ~~~'I '
.~y+ ~ r•,~c ~ ~oS s"'- .~,'?..,~~~`,4,~:: ~Y~, ~a,~
WK ~ . ry tC'C f
7
~ . . , ~ , .
~
slci raclcs approved in 1987
wr~y~ ..y,~:• -
'r
i
- x
~ t . .y
>~f
c;u r~~ , .'+t~
;
, . r. . , , '
r I
~ .
i
I
I '
1
t ~ bf f ~
H 1
~
~ {s~'.,.:mh,r,~:
dp` ' ~ I I I I~r 7 ~~3~°~ ~AFO' ` , ?e ~ a •
ii .
I ~ N
N?~~
.r .
51
. ~ J ; I!. ~ ~ ~
l.A (`ii) y
I ~ `'r•Ijti ; ~ f~~i I { ~t t11ig J~~1 5to1
age
4t 1 '
. . .
~ 4K~,~-:
R1 ` "'~~'V ~ n ~ " _ ~ '~a~~ t ~ ~ 1 " ~ 4 i
! '~i.~~``'µ' . n? ~ j r? 9 , ~ ~ y:~
ia,,• ~a~r... ,E.$` .;r`~ ~a . ~~`~~I 9 ~ • ` ' ~
b .ti . , t ~ . .,d . . ~
! r~ ~
Al
( ' ~ ~ : ~~ie
ry E ~ t ~ ~ . . " •
>
~ ~ ;4{~, FF• , , "d- ;r~ .`i
~
sYS; ~ : .e•.. V r~ f^`' - r.
•j ~ '!'Y
. ~aw,. ~ . x ey A.•~ S ~ . -9 .i ~i.
~
j ~ ~ _ _
:w .
~
r
e• .y.ti ~+:r~iyY:
y . • a._.' ~
~ - ; - .
flECEIVED: 4-11-97; 12:02Ptd; 970-827-5858 TOV HUMAN RESOURCE; q2
East Villaqe Homeowners Associ970-827-5856 04/11I1997 11:57:37 AM P.2 ~
EAS`r ~~~~~G-z 140MEOwNERs AssocIATTON9 INCo
Ofiicers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm
Directors - Judith Berkowitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie CauLkhris - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder
To: Ivlayor Bob Armour and Members of the Town Council
From: Jim Lamont, Executive Director
Date: April 11, 1997
RE: Sonnenalp Austria Hau.s Special Development District Application
The Board of Directors ofthe Homeowners Association opposes the Sonnenalp Austria
Haus Special Development District as proposed. The Association requests the Town Council to
demr approval of the ordinance crea.ting the Sonnenalp Austria Haus Special Development District
for the following reasons.
The requested amount af GRFA eYCeeds by approximately 91 % that allowed by the under-
lying Public Accommodation zone district. Further, all other zoning standards are exceeded in vary-
ing degrees su$icient to cause the bulk and mass of the building to be excessive in the extreme. As a
result the proposal does not conform to the applicable elemetrts of the Vail Comprehensive Plan as
specifically provided for in Vail Village Master Plan and the applicable Special Development Dis-
trict review criterion A, B, D, F and H.
The Vail Village Master Plan provides for a building height of three to four stories. The
proposal building is five stories. The building height does not conform to zoning height limit of 48
feet for a sloping roof:
GRFA, common azea, site coverage and setback deviations are significant contributors ta the
excessive size and density of the proposed struoture and are respoasible for the project's incompati-
bility witla the surrounding neighborhood.
The excessive buiIding size created by the deviations from the underlying Publie Accom-
modation zone district creates a grant of special privilege that is denied to all other property owners.
The potential for many other property owners to claim a right to the same grant of special privilege
sets in place a de facto precedent for a11 properties in all zone districts, with tiie eYCeptian of tEiose -
where special development districts are precluded. ne tesulting effect of establishing a cle facto
precedent that could permit the doubling of densities throughout a large azea of the cvmmunity is
unknown and undocumented. As a result, the Vail Comprehensive Plan and other applieable plan-
ning documents do not address the negative consequences that could be spawned by the approval of the Sonnenalp Austria Haus SDD as proposed. To aavQCate or promulgate a praposition that may
directly threaten economic stability and matters of quality of life are a misguided and an unwar-
ranted gamble with the community's welfare.
It is the puipose of zoning to provide for the fair, equal and consistent treatinefft among all
classes of property owners. 'Ihe Sonnenalp Austria Haus Special Developmerrt District breaks all
zoning standards, as well causes the very principles and puiposes of zoning to be violated in the eY-
treme. It is now euident that the Special Development District can to be used as an instnunent by
Town administrators and the Planning Commission to maneuver Town Councils'to accept extreme
Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorada 81658
Telephone: (970) 827-5680 Message/FAX: (970) 327-5856
NECEIVEO: 4•11-97; 12:03PM; 970-827-5856 TOV HUMAN RESOUFlCE; q3
East Villaqe Homeowners Associ970-827-5856 04/11/1997 11:57:37 AM P.3
EVHA/Sonnenalp Austria Haus Special Development District Application 4/11/97
Page 2
deviations from the zoning standards. The Special Development District because of the potential
for abuse and misuse must be either severely restrained or abolished.
The Homeowners Association vigorously objects to the use of the Special Development Dis-
trict or any other pennitting procedures as a method to extort financial exactions from an applicant
in exchange for zoning concessions. Exaction gives lwth the appearance and the perception of con-
flicts of interests resulting from private negotiation between developers and government officials.
Financial exactions in exchange for zoning eoncessions undennine the public's confidence in the
government's fair, equal and consistent application and enforcement of zoning standards. If streets- ,
cape improvements and deed restricted housing units are desirable and can be legally mandated as
an exaction, then they should be universally required in a11 zone districts.
The Homeowners Association strenuously objects to any condition of approval that abridges
any applicant or property vwners covenanted property right or right of legal protest against the
violation of a covenanted property rigYrt or any other right of protest. Specifically, the Association
objects to the inclusion of any "not to remonstrate" condition-of-approval that waives or precluded
the legal protest to any -violation by the Town of Vail of a covenanted property rights associated with
the Gore Creek stream tract. The Association views any requirement by Town of Vail as an abu-
sive use of its power and authority to impose terms and conditions upon property owners through its
zone enforcement powers that are intended to absolve the Town government of its responsibiliiy, as
a property owner of the Gore Creek stream tract, to abide by covenants restrictions attached to the
stream tract.
The Homeowners Association respectfully requests that the application for a Special Devel-
opment District for the Sonnenalp Austria Haus be denied.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 14, 1997
SUBJECT: An appeai of an administrative decision regarding Section 18.64.040 (Non-
Confiorming Uses), stating that private and public unstructured off-street parking
is a different land use than private and pubiic structured ofi-street vehicie
, parking, and therefore, an existing legal non-conforming use may not be
continued.
Appeilant: Pepi Gramshammer, represented by Kurt Segerberg
Planner: George Ruther
1. Sl9BJECT PROPEFtTV
. Gasthof Gramshammer, located at 231 Gore Creek Drive/on a part of Lot A, Block 5-D,
Vail Viliage First Filing.
EI. STANDYNG OF APPELLANY -
The staff believes the appellant has standing to file this appeal as the appellant, Pepi
Gramsharnmer, is the owner of the Gasthof Gramshammer and is the operator of the
existing, surface parking area.
@II. BACKGROUND
On February 24, 1997, Pepi Gramshammer, represented by Kurt Segerberg of Pierce,
Segerberg & Associates Architects, submitted an application for a major exterior
alteration in Commercial Core 1 and a minor subdivision to the Community Development
Department for review. Upon preliminary review of the proposed major exterior alteration
application, it was determined by staff that the removal of the existing, legal, non-
conforming, unstructured (surface), off-street parking area and subsequent construction
of a structured off-street parking area constituted a change in use, and therefore, the
property must be brought into compliance with the development regulations prescribed in
the Municipal Code.
1
The Gasthof Gramshammer is located in the Commercial Core 1(CC1) Zone District.
According to the parking regulations outlined in Section 18.24.180 of the CC1 Zone
District, in part,
"...no parking shall be provided on-site."
Instead, property owners in the CC1 Zone District shall be required to contribute to the
Town Parking Fund.
The surface parking area that currently exists at the Gasthof Gramshammer is considered
a legal, non-conforming use. According to Chapter 18.64 of the Municipal Code,
"The use of a site lawfully estabiished prior to the effective date of the adoption of
`the Municipal Code which does not conform with the use regulations of the CC1
Zone District may be continued, provided that no such non-conforming use shall
be enlarged to occupy a greater site area than it occupied on the effective date of
the adoption of the Code. Additionally, a reduction in site area occupied by a non-
conforming use shall be deemed a new limitation, and the use shali not thereafter
be enlarged to occupy a greater site area than the new limitation."
Furthermore, the Municipal Code identifies a distinction between private or public
unstructured off-street vehicle parking and private or public off-street vehicle parking
structures. This distinction is made in Sections 18.34.020 and 18.34.030 of the Municipal
Code, as unstructured parking is a permitted use, and structured parking is a conditional
use in the Parking Zone District. This is similar to the way the Code identifies a
distinction between passive outdoor recreation and active outdoor recreation as a
permitted use, in the Outdoor Recreation Zone District. Each is a type of outdoor
recreation, however, as a land use, each differs greatly.
IV. NATURE OF THE APPEAL
The appellant is appealing the administrative (staff) decision regarding the change in use
of an on-site vehicle parking area at the Gasthof Gramshammer. As discussed
previously, the appellant is proposing to remove an existing non-conforming surface
parking area in the Commercial Care 1 Zone District and replace it with a new
underground parking structure. The appellant contends that the use of the property will
not be changing with the construction of the parking structure. The appellant believes
that there is no distinction betweerr structured and unstructured off-street parking as a
land use, and therefore, the PEC should allow the legal, non-conforming status of the
property for on-site parking to remain.
The appellant further contends that the existing legal non-conforming use will be reduced
as a result of the major exterior alteration. Currently, there are currently approximately 20
parking spaces within a 6,400 square foot area. Upon completion af the remodef, the
enclosed parking area will comprise approximately 4,232 square feet and accommodate
15 vehicles.
Staff acknowledges that the proposed change in use would most likely improve the
overall appearance of the Village by enclosing the parking area and screening the
vehicles from public view, however, aesthetics are not relevant to this appeal. What is
relevant in this appeal is whether surface parking differs as a land use from structured
parking. `
2
V. ACTIAN REQUESTED ,
The PEC is requested to uphold/uphold with modifications/overturn the staff's
administrative decision regarding the non-conforming parking situation, as it relates to the
Gasthof Gramshammer.
9V. STAIFF RECOiViiVrEND,4TB0N
The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and
Environmental Commission uphold the staff's administrative decision stating that the
removal of the existing legal, non-conforming unstructured (surface parking, and the
subsequent construction of an underground parking structure, constitutes a change in
use,'and therefore, the property must be brought into compliance with the development
regulations prescribed in the Municipal Code.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to uphold the staff's
administrative decision, the staff would recommend that the PEC make the following
findings:
1. That private and public unstructured (surface) off-street vehicle parking is a
different land use than private and public structured off-street vehicle parking.
2. That the removal of the existing legal, non-conforming unstructured (surface) off-
street vehicle parking area at the Gasthof Gramshammer, and the subsequent
construction of an underground structured off-street vehicle parking area,
constitutes a change in use, and therefore, the property must be brought into
compliance with the development regulations prescribed in the Municipal Code.
f:\everyone\pec\1nemos\pepi's.414 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 14, 1997
SUBJECT: An appeal of a staff denial of the outdoor ski storage, located adjacent to the
Gondola BuildinglTract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing.
Appellant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
Planner: Lauren Waterton
9. SIJBJECY PROPERTV
The ski storage is located outside the Gondola Building, at 600 Lionshead Mall, Tract D, Vail
Lionshead 1 st Filing.
11. STANDING OF APPELLANT
Staff believes the appellant has standing to file an appeal in this case as the appellant, Vail
` Associates, is the owner of the property and operator of the ski storage.
011. BAC6CGFi0UND
On February 10, 1997, Vail Associates, Inc., submitted an application to the Town of Vail for
Design Review Board approval to allow outdoor ski storage near the Gondola Building in
Lionshead. Upon review of the permitted uses within Commerciai Core II, staff determined that
outdoor ski storage is not a permitted use within this zone district. According to Section
18.06.020(B) Permitted Uses, any use listed is determined to be an exclusive use of that district
and any use not specifically permitted, is prohibited. In Commercial Core II (CCII), zoning is also
differentiated according to level of building. A use permitted within the first level, is prohibited in
other levels, unless specifically listed as a permitted or conditional use on other levels.
Indoor and outdoor ski storage is listed as a permitted use only within the Ski Base/Recreation
zone district, and commercial ski storage is listed as a permitted use within the basement level of
buildings in the CCII zone district. Staff denied the applicanYs request because the outdoor ski
storage use does not comply with the CCII zone district.
oV. NATI?RE OF THE APPEAL
The appellant is appealing the staff decision to deny the use of ski storage in this location. The
appellant has indicated tha.t he believes the ski racks are a legal non-conforming use, and should
therefore, be allawed to cantinue. On October 7, 1987, Vail Associates received Design Review
Board approval for seasonal unstructured metal ski racks at the Lionshead Gondola Building (see
attached photo). In 1989, the Town approved a minor modification to the ski racks. In 1996, the
1
,
TOWN OF VA1L
metal ski racks were removed and replaced with plywood sided wood sheds with ski racks inside
(see attached photo).
In 1987, staff determined that the outdoor ski racks were a permitted use, and a request for ski
storage was approved by the Design Review Board. Because these unstructured, metal racks
are not allowed under the zoning regulatians currently in place, these ski storage racks were
considered a legal nonconforming use. Section 18.64.010 (Nonconforming Sites, Uses,
Structures and Site Improvements), identifies the purpose of this chapter:
"is intended to limit the number and extent of nonconforming uses and structures by
prohibiting or limiting their enlargernent, their reestabiishment after abandonment, and
their restoration after substantial destruction. While permitting nonconforming uses,
structures and improvements to continue, this chapter is intended to limit enlargement,
alteration, restoration or replacement which would increase the discrepancy between
existing conditions and the development standards prescribed by this title."
The appellant has stated that he believes that the racks have not been substantially changed and
therefore, remains a legal, nonconforming structure/use. The original approval in 1987,
permitted a total of 10 metal ski racks near the Gondola Building (see attached photo). Currently,
there are 14 sheds containing ski storage, close to the Gondola Building. Staff denied the
request because it is staff's opinion that trie ski storage has been substantially altered and
enlarged, resulting in the loss of its nonconforming status.
The appellant has also stated that he believes that the ski storage, as existing, is below grade,
• because the first level of the Gondola Buildirig is substantially below grade on the north side, and
portions of the east and west sides. Furthermore, the appellant states that the ski storage racks
are within a structure, and accordingly, permitted in CCII.
Staff believes that the ski storage is clearly outside the Gondola Building, and therefore, the
grade around the building is irrelevant. Ftarthermore, should this be considered a building, it is on
the first floor of the building, and ski storage is not permitted on first floor of a building in CCII.
Also, it should be noted that these structures were all installed without the benefit of staff
approval or a building permit.
V. REQUIRED ACTION
Uphold/Overturn/N9odify the staff's denial af the request for approval of outdoor ski storage.
The Planning and Environmental Commissian is required to make findings of fact in accordance
with Section 18.66.030 (5) shown below:
5. Findings. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall on all appeals
make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented
to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and
conditions imposed by the requirements of this title have or have not been met.
VI. STAFF RECOfVIiVIEND,4TION
Staff recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission uphold the staff's denial of
the outdoor ski storage and recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission
make the following findings:
2
. ,
1. That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 18
(Zoning) have not been met.
2. That the ski storage use has been substantially aitered and eniarged and is no
longer a legal nonconforming use.
3. That the installation of these structures is in violation of the zoning code.
F:\everyon e\pec\me mo\skistore.414
3
.
R2~ .
Vail Assocflates, Inc. MAR 1 4 1997
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~`i`'i i •}.'il t.+...,,~1. . . . .
~ Ov j;'_4' ,
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Susan Connelly
Director of Community Development
Town of Vaii
75 S. Frontage Road West
' Vail, CO 81657
March 14, 1997
NOTICE OF APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL 2126197 OF VAIL ASSOCIATE_S, INC.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION DATED 2110197;
DETERMINATION MADE FINAL 315197
Dear Susan:
This letter is sent in connection with section H of the staff action Appeals Form.
DEGISION BE1NG APPEALED
On 2/26197, Staff denied an appiication by Vail Associates, Inc. for Design Review of
ski storage facilities located on Vail Associates, Inc. property in Lionshead, The
OwnersandOperatorso/ reasons are cited in a letter from Lauren Waterton tlated 2126197. Under section
Vail, Beaver Creekw Resort
andAirowheadMountain" 18,66.030 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, such determination became final on
3/5/97.
We respectfully disagree with the staff denial of this application antl appeal that
decision to the Planning and Environmental Commission pursuant to section
18.66.030.6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
REASON FOR APPEAL
On October 7, 1987, Vail Associates, Inc. received Design Review Board approval for
seasonal ski racks at the Liorishead Gondola Building and at other locations. Certain
1987 DRB documents are attached for reference and incorporated herein. At that
time, zoning in CCI and CCII allowed the use in the above zone districts.
Subsequently, in 1989, the zoning was changed to allow for commercial ski storage
only in the basement or garden levels within a structure. The basement or garden
level is that fioor of a buiiding that is entirely or substantially below grade.
°'xr
1999 W00.1D ALPINE
$q CILLNPIONSHiPS
YAILIIEAVEICItfC y~
C 0 L 0 o 0 PO Box 7• Vail, Colorado • 81658 • phone 970 476 5601
. ,
Please be aware that the Lionshead Gondola Building has multiple grade levels. In
fact the level containing the existing ski storage is entirely or substantially below
grades on the east, north and west sides of the building. Additionally, we contend that
the existing ski storage racks are within a structure and, therefore, are a permitted use
under the current CCII zoning.
In the alternative, if the PEC disagrees with the above interpretation, our position is
' that the existing ski storage is a legal non-conforming use untler Chapter 18.64 of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code. The wintertime use of ski racks on this site has
continued each ski season since approvetl in 1987. Further, as it is unclear precisely
what area the ski racks occupied when the zoning code was amendetl in 1989, we
contend that the Staff has improperly and arbitrarily determinetl the current ski racks
to have been enlarged.
Regarding the zoning change in 1989 which addressetl commercial ski storage in CCI
~ & CCII, we obviously find this an important matter and would have opposed any code
change had we been aware of it at the time. Outside ski storage is common at ski
areas, including Winter Park, Keystone, Vail, Beaver Creek and Arrowhead, to name a
few examples.
In summary, we believe Staff is in error regarding its conclusion that the Vail
Associates' ski storage facilities in Lionshead are in violation of the zoning code as
stated in letters to me dated 12/30/96 and 2/26/97.
Please let me know when we can discuss this appeal with the PEC.
Sincerely,
VAI SSOCIATES, INC.
~
oe Macy ~
Manager, Gove mental Affairs
attachments:
(1) Appeals Form dated 3/14/97
(2) DRB approval dated 1017/87
(3) DRB agenda form dated 1017/87
cc: Jim Mandel, Lauren Waterton, Tom Moorhead, Chris Ryman
~a~
r. „
. ~
4 •5-
. . ~ ~~8 ~y ~ d.il b i Yq+ ~~+M } 6 B • k' . a. . ' . "
1
£
. ~ ' .
~
ski raclcs approved in 1987
~
F
A~. c
~
(
fM ~~4 a ~ . : 'O+t" y~, y .j`1~ . . . • 1{`
~ S{~~~ FK~, 1 ; • .s r ~ i ~ .
t
~ . r. . .
. . - . ~
~N~ . . • l ,
C'_XlStlllg SI<1 storage
~ 5: T n ~ i i ; i; L ~j t•''
)'~~.0Y:.4• 4 ~ . ( ' . ~ I
1 YK~ f"
~.~K'~ t . • s~ ~ N :
~ ~Y ,'iF • S~i`' . . , a: ~
~ . if^~ ~ r { . _ 'T!. t }t'rf. 4 !hr e ' ~
` WL~Z~~~~y b .:~r~'~~'~. ~ , r- _ s.~•_`• , ...e
t rrd+~ e F , . »s ±:~5'"~ w ' ~.'~''y , 'r'u;~-"•; i .
~..1. • ~ ~ ~,4;.~y~~~:..~aiv~; y..- • ^r?r . } . . :.~~kd'~~'
Z~
rs; ,W
~ O~`~. a r v. ~ 'k;~ R r 1 • 7' ~
~.~i; x "h M' ~{K -b 'y'R' ,y~t ai . ~
c i'S ct . r a` ~
u?"l a
4. S ws! •L~s~. ' yL. . . , •
4 .f + ,i '..~yr}~ ~ .f . y~4•4LiF,., t.. ' y ~~1~ ` J
~ ~ Z i,tLuaf•W ^ t ~Y~' ~.~:e~~S' •~•~_N~ ~.~TE
J . ' ~~`,~7~ ~'/,~~g 3y"~• (
p. ~.t v•f 1-~.~y~"42
: ~ ' y~ _'r~Y ? f f ISl' ~Ffc i
R-{ ya~ ~L R. :l {
~i sa
rI
y~ ~ , ~ ; _i~T 4 ! ~ r~ ` a Y
73~~ x T ~ ~ ~ _...'<.Y.. . . ' y rS^7~ _
j t'Hy'3y j ¢k ~ F t C~ o' 'Y..
i ~ , ~~y' • I ~ ` 0
f~
3 2 ~
4 ~
r
r
~
9~t t~.r~
W ~ m J a
p#~., ~ ~ .
t ~ _:•,~.~i~,.ay
$ ~.~+t.Lw
-.a .~t~s.i . . . .
' F ~ .~A~',~ a t ' •
T MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 14, 1997
SUBJECT: A request for an amendment to the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski
Base to allow for outdoor ski storage, located at 458 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail
Village 5th Filing and Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Appticant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Joe Macy
P(anner: Lauren Waterton
1. DESCRAPTlON OF THE REQIJEST
The applicant is requesting to amend the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base to
allow for outdoor ski storage. While indoor and outdoor ski storage is a permitted use within the
Ski Base/Recreation zone district, the development plan must be amended to show the approved
location on the plan. The existing development plan indicates that ski storage will be provided
within a portion of the existing bus shelter. However, that space is not being uti?ized as ski
storage. Recently, an 800 square foot structure that encloses the skis has been constructed on
site, without Town of Vail approval. This application is a request to come into compliance with
the development plan.
On March 10, 1997, the PEC reviewed a request to amend the development plan in order to
allow the existing ski storage to continue. At that time, the application was tabled in order to
allow the applicant to address the PEC's concerns related to lack of compatibility between the
existing structures and the proposed ski storage and the location of the proposed use.
The appiicant has revised the plans to address these concerns. The proposed building will be in
approximately the same location as the existing structure, however, it will be 265 square feet
smaller than the exisfing structure. The applicant is proposing to expand the existing bus shelter,
continuing the stucco walls and stone pillars to allow the ski storage to be integrated into the bus
shelter. An entrance to the building will be on the north side, facing the main building. The
building will contain an attendant booth and racks to hold approximately 420 pairs of skis that are
stored overnight.
tl. BAC9CGROUND
In 1983, a new zone district, Ski Base/Recreation, was created in order to allow the Golden Peak
Ski Base facility to be rezoned from Agricultural and Open Space to Ski Base/Recreation. As a
part of the rezoning process, a development plan for the site was required. In late 1983, the
Town Council approved a development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base. The plan has been
amended several times over the years.
The most recent amendment occurred on December 19, 1995, when the Town Council approved
1
rowN
*VAIL
, .
an amendment to the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base. That amendment
included a new base facility (currently under construction), new chair lifts, a new bus lane and
bus shelter, new drop-off areas and other site improvements.
In conjunction with the development plan approval, the Town Council approved Ordinance 24,
Series of 1995, that updated the language of the Ski Base/Recreation zone district. The Golden
Peak Ski Base is the only property within the Town of Vail with this zoning designation.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
Staff believes that this amendment does not affect any of the zoning standards for the Ski
Base/Recreation zone district.
IV. REVIEW CRITERIA
The development plan for the Ski Base Recreation zone district shall meet each of the following
standards or demonstrate that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical
solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved:
Development Plan Standards/Criteria for Evaluation
1. The develaper will provide a buffer zone in areas where the Ski
Base/Recreation district boundary is adjacent to a residential.use district
boundary. The buffer zone must be kept free of buildings or structures and
must be landscaped, screened to protect it by natural features so that
adverse effects on the surrounding areas are minimized. This may require a
buffer zone of sufficient size to adequately separate the proposed use from
the surrounding properties in terms of visual privacy, noise, adequate light,
air, air pollution, signage and other comparable potentiaify incompatibte
factors;
Staff believes that the addition of the ski storage will not impact the buffer zone
between this site and the neighborhood. This use does not remove any
landscaping or decrease the buffer area. The ski storage is located beiween the
bus stop and the main buildirig and will not adversely impact the surrounding
neighborhood.
2. A circulation system designed for the type of traffic generated, taking into
consideration safety, separation from living areas, convenience, access,
noise, and exhaust control4 Private internal streets may be permitted if they
can be used by police arad fiire department vehicles for emergency purposes.
Bicycle traffic shall be considered and provided when the site is to be used
for residential purposes;
Staff believes that the addition of ski storage to this site will not adversely impact
the circulation system. The addition of the ski storage building to this location will
not add significant congestion in the plaza area. Staff believes that since the
2
previous review by the PEC, the applicant has revised the plan to alleviate staff's
and the PEC's concerns related to congestion. Staff believes that the proposed
configuration of the ski storage will allow for queuing, without negatively impact
the pedestrian circulation.
3. Functional open space in terms of: optimum preservation of natural features
(including trees and drainage areas), recreation, views, convenience, and
function;
The amendment does not affect the open space of this site. Staff believes this
criterion is not applicable.
4. Variety in ferms of: housing type, densities, facilities and open space;
`This criterion is not applicable to this request to amend the development plan.
5. Privacy in ferms of the needs of: individuals, families and neighbors;
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will affect this criterion.
6. Pedestrian traffic in terms of: safety, separation, convenience, access to
points of destination, and attractiveness;
Staff believes that the proposed ski storage will not interfere with the internal
pedestrian circulation ori-site. On the existing development plan, the area around
the bus stop.was identified as a plaza, accommodating pedestrian movement in
this area. This plaza connects the Children's Center, main building, ski lifts and
bus stop. While this proposal will reduce the plaza area, staff believes that the
revised plan reduces the impact of the proposal by allowing people to queue for
the ski storage in an area that is out of the way of the pedestrian tratf+c flow.
7. Building 4ype in terms of: appropriateness to density, site relationship, and
bulk;
Staff believes that this building is appropriately sized for the proposed location.
The applicant has shown how it is possible to integrate it into the existing bus
shetter. Staff is concerned about the amount of blank wall facing onto the bus
lane and entry plaza. In order to reduce the impact of this wall, staff would
recommend that the approved sign program for this development be amended in
order to allow a directional sign on this wall. Specifically, the sign program calls
for a directional sign to be located on the corner of the retaining wall (see
attached site plan). Staft recommends that the sign be eliminated and replaced
with a sign (of the same size) on the wall of this building. Staff believes that it is a
more appropriate location for a directory sign and will add visual interest to this
building.
8. Landscaping of the total site in terms of: purposes, types, maintenance,
suitability, and effect on the neighborhood.
This amendment will not affect any existing or proposed landscaping. The ski
3
,
storage building is located on an existing plaza and staff believes that this
proposed use does not affect this criterion.
V. STAFF RECOflflMENDATION
The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the appiicant's request
to allow for an amendment to the development plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base subject to the
foilowing finding:
That the proposed major amendment has met the 8 criteria for evaluation of a
development plan in the Ski Base/Recreation zone district.
The recommendation for approval is subject to the following condition:
That'the applicant submit an application to the Design Review Board to amend the sign
program to modify the location of the directional sign. The sign shown on Sheet 1.2 of
the Sign Program, approved by the Design Review Board on July 17, 1996, must be
removed from the Sign Program in order to locate a directional sign on the wall of the ski
storage building. '
F:\everyone\pec\memoskgpeak.414
4 , '
- "
~
. ~ •r~ ~I
i EXiST EU5 ~ ~ 2W,
,~i
I EUI! DI~ N_°W SKI (~ti V~c~tlovwp /
' ' -~v- I II
i ,CDDITION gl~
t~I'Ct11trC[t17t
c ~ C ~ grouprW
I / (97o)s+~.7a34
~
II _ I Z
I i ~ \
I ~
~ U
~
si-rE FLAN ~
av i..=2m'_m., ~
NOtJSE > !Z Cn v
~ n.~o•' ,
PflnS~
aPR 81997,t=:
i uU - Co~~~iV~, D~~~~ U~ A1.1
fi ~w ~4-,.•-~
~~ti
A
~ .
Va:(
e'p
P.rchit--chure
r, u groa,~
li li ...,..:L...~,.,._.
te7o1s.9.-u3.
Ij I
I{ II
I' I
I~; II
z F
i-_-- --JII
I ~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_r ~I - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
=i__--____-_
n~n n~~ nTn nTn Fn ,
~~~.,,,~qI I ~ ~ I i 2
r -
F-~ 1~2 I I ( I I I I ~ I ~ 4 ' I I I I I I I I " I ' I I I I I l ~ Af1
L I-LI J U11--LJ U! U L1-L U LU; ;
I ~ ~ ~ic¢'F L------ ~
• I _ L. I ~ ~
~ Ill~ ~ t
~ier ~ I I
BU9 BTOP / LIFT OPERATIGN
a I I
~ fvf~LD!~L^• I
1
L____________________~ _J
N1 ~r
4
I ~
C
~
~
U C
9L. 'r~~~
7
G -
°>C7>
m
- 1 ~~~OfR FLAN sl<<.
A2.1
?F- A!.L
_ I
=_x,ST rzOo= e=_YOr.D
. NcW RppFING ~ Fl.5Cl:.
70 M:.7CN EX157
N°W L.PPUED TIMSER ~ -
.~1
T~c155 TO MATGFJ EXIST ----1 V311
AICtll[CCi447C
FLW =1=5 TO MATGFJ EXIST. ~ grpup
NEW SHAKF NEIU SNGK°_ . o,.....
~ HIP ROOF HIP ROOr NEW _IFS SAt~II~S TO crio) s.~-%o~
Wl2xi7 GcDAR Wl2xl2 GEDAR M.CTGN EXI57.
FASGIA FASGIA ~
L.GMINATcD OYc'R7-!=_AD
, 9"o LG,. 9"o LCG DOOR TO Ei^ULA7e A
COR'1_RS CppNcf25 I~ PAIR OF SWlNG DOORS
EIFS ~ 3/i' EIFS hEW STO^lE VENEcR=D
PI'cR5 70 FIATGH Ex15T
I1/2" E1=5 I~,• F~-S G
~ BAND BAND
v
3 =
~ G;UARD ~40USE EL~~ATfONS r2-~SfQE ELEVATf0N
I EXISTING EUS STOP BUILDIhG I h_W SKI 5T02=.BE ADDITION ~
NEW ROOFING 4 FASCIA ~
TO MATGN EXIST ~
- ~
- NEU EIFS BAND TO MATGN 0
~ EXIST L ~
NcW EIFS TO MATGN EXIST. ~ w
>
u
~ NEW STONE VENE'cR°_D PIERS
~ ? I ~ o
TD MATCN EXI57 C14
G e
30
vC7~°L:7V`,,
a\FRO I`l T l-- LEYATI O 1 `l stcrr:
~
; an: 'r a.
; .
de
e4
T~i~I OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157 ~
April 10, 1997
Mr. Paul Johnston
Vaif Town Council
Dear Mr. Johnston,
Hopefully we wiii be successfui in arranging this meeting between Peter Seibert and Jesus
Bautista Moroles. if so, i would appreciate your comments on his proposal and the other works
represented in this catatog.
l am also hopeful you will be willing to partake in any future conversations with the artist.
Please let me know your response. I may be reached at 479-2344.
Thank you, -
Nancy Sw e~ ne
Y
AIPP Coordinator
RECYCLEDPAPER
Id
eb
TOWN OF VAIL
1309 Vail Valley Drive Department of Public Works & Transportation
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2158 / Fnx 970-479-2166
April 10, 1997
Mr. Peter Seibert
P.O. Box 7
Vail, CO 81658 Dear Peter,
On behalf of the Art in Public Places 8oard and the Town of Vail, 1 would like to arrange a meeting
between Jesus Bautista Moroles and yourself to discuss your concerns regarding the Seibert Circle
design. Because these concerns are very important, we would appreciate the opportunity for you, as well
as your family and friends, to meet with the artist and discuss how his design could more accurately
address your aspirations for the plaza. He is aware of your disappointment with the design as it exists
and understands your desire to capture more of an alpine flavor while telling the story of Vail's history and
skiing. We would also like to discuss the text on the benches and the specific message you wish to
convey about your vision, your family, and the indelible mark you have left on the community.
I am sorry not to have been able to reach you by telephone, but I hope to hear from you soon. I may
be reached at 479-2344 or home, 479-9794. We remain hopeful we can work together toward a
common vision.
Sincerely,
i ~
Nancy Sweeney
AIPP Coordinator -
cc: Warren Miller, Pepi Gramshammer, Margie Plath
RECYCLEDPAPER
i
;
Call to Artists - Page 3
E. _ SELECTION CRITER1A
The AIPP Board and selection jury shall use the tollowing criteria when reviewing
proposals. All final proposals should specrfically address each of these criteria:
1. Proven Abilitv
The artist or artisVdesign team must demonstrate proven ability and experience in ~
the creation of works of art as well as the design of outdoor public space. Artists
withoui proven ability to develop outdoor public spaces must demonstrate their
experience or understanding of working in collaboration with a professional
landscape architect or site planner. Selection will be based on previous work for
simitar projects.
2. Col(aborative Design Process
The artist or artist/design team must demonstrate their capability and experience
working in a collaborative design process including input from the Town of Vail,
Art in Pubfic Places Board, and the community.
3. Qualitv and Innovation
The consideration of highest priority is the inherent artistic excellence and
innovation of the proposal. The.intention is to create a distinctive, engaging
public plaza.
4, Timelessness
The artistic design should have relevance aesthetically to the community in future
years. Because the art will be highly visible in a well-used space, the concept
should reflect enduring artistic quality.
5. Community Relevance
The design must have relevance to the Vail Valley. It must possess a specific
connection to this geographic region and/or the surrounding community.
6. Approachable
Seibert Circle is both visually and physically a town center. The area functions as a
meeting place, gathering spot, and thoroughfare. Therefore, the design must be
inviting, interactive and approachable.
7. Permanence
The design shall have structural and surface soundness and be resistant to theft,
vandalism, and weathering. All components must be durable enough to
withstand hanging, swinging, jumping, or general carousing. It must also be
durable to liabilities specific to Vail, such as snowplows and recreational hazards
(skateboards, rollerblades, etc.)
8. Maintenance
The design should not require excessive or continual maintenance.
9. Publi_ ~ SafetY
The design shall not create safety or liability problems for the general public
or the Tawn of Vail.
10. Non-Obstructive
The design must not obstruct street level views. There is no specific height
restriction, howrever, no structure should visually hinder access to storefront
windows.
„ I
Call to Artists
Page 4
SELECTION CRITERIA - continuation
11. Community Involvement
The artist or artist/design team shail have experience in community oriented
projects and in facilitating a community vision during development of public art
projects.
12. Site Apnropriateness
The art component should enhance the surrounding area and should form an
overall relationship with the site.
13. Bud4etary Parameters
The artist or artist/design team must work within the established budget.
F. PROJECT PROCESS AND SCHEDULE
Phase I
1. A call to artists is issued through advertisement and invitation. October 15, 1996
2. Phase I application and proposal materials must be received. January 6, 1997
3. Jury selects a maximum of 5 semi-finalists. January 21, 1997
Phase II
4. Semi-finalists are paid an honorarium to develop their proposals. January 24, 1997
5. Semi-finalists present their Phase II proposals to the jury. March 21, 1997
A final proposal is selected.
6. The final proposal is reviewed by the Art in Public Places Board, April 8, 1997
Town of Vail Design Review Board, Planning and Environmental
Commission, the Department of Public Works, and the Town Council.
7. The artist or artist/design team will meet with Town of Vail officials to April 9, 1997
determine the project process, final budget and schedule for
completion.
Phase III
8. The Town of Vail will contract avith the artist or artist/design team April 18, 1997
9. A public forum is held where the community can interact with the April 21, 1997
artist or artist/design team to express their thoughts on the proposal.
10. Incorporating the public feedback, the design of Seibert Circle is June 10, 1997
developed and finalized.
11. Final design is presented by the artist or artist/design team at July 3, 1997
a fundraising event.
12. Installation of utility and infrastructure work in Seibert Circle August 15, 1997
to begin.
13. Installation of paving, artwork, and furnishings to begin. April 15, 1998
14. Artist to document maintenance procedures and schedule.
15. Dedication of Seibert Circle. July 4, 1998
. r . . 1
I ~ i1HEiViORAPJDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission/Design Review Board
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 14, 1997
RE: A joint mee.ting with the Design Review Board to make a recommendation to
Council on the "Wish List" items for the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
Applicant: Town of Vail
;'Staff: Community Development, Public Works, and Public Relations
1. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE FtEQUEST
Attached is a copy of the consultant's memo on Stage II and Stage III of the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan. Stage II of the master plan process is the public input stage where
"wish Iist" items were submitted by the public. This input included 2 public forums for public input,
a mail in "wisli IisY" form, and finally an open house where the community was able to see all of the
"wish list" items and using "dots," was able to show their preferences to be considered in Stage III.
Also, the public was able to show preferences through a newspaper advertisement that could be
mailed to the Town.
Stage III of the master plan process is the stage where the consultant team reviews and tests all of
the wish list items and makes a recommendation about their inclusion in the final master plan. See
the cansultant memo and other attachrnents for a complete description of Stage II and Stage III.
II. STAFF RECOfViNiENDATIQN
The consultant team and the Town staff is requesting that the PEC and the DRB review the wish
list items and forward ihese to the Town Council for inclusion in Stage III of the master plan
process. Specifically, the consultant and Town staff recommend the following actions:
1. That the wish list items articulated in Attachment "B" be carried into Stage III of the
master plan process for detailed study by the consultant and master plan team, or
R. That special consideratian or priority be given to a particular wish list idea or
category of ideas.
b. Tha.t specific wish list ideas, if any, be removed from consideration in Stage
I I I of the master plan process.
File: f:\everyone\pecUnemosUionhead.414
%VAIL
TOW,
0
Consultant Memorandum
LIONSHEAD MAS'~ERPLAN
~ff
TOWN OF VAIL
PLANNIN~ AN~ ENVIRONMENTAL COM1VIISSIOIeT
DESIGN R]EVIEW BOARD
W~~HL][ST - PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Ape-al IlIl, 1997
Design Workshop
953 S. Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
(970) 476-8408
Q
ILIONSHEAD MASTERP1LAN
STAG]E dff ]PROGIltE1Ni[ DEVELOPMENT- WISH LdST U]PDATE
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
A. Purpose of Stage II
B. What has happened so far?
C. Stage II Completion Process
II. Wisli List Areas of Sensitivity "
III. Introduction to Stage III
Attachments
Attachment "A"- Public Preference Response to Wish List Ideas
Attachment "B"- Stage II Wish List Responses: Policy Objective Analysis
Attachment "C"- Complete Wish List Submittals Packet
T
L INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose of Stage II
Stage II of the Lionshead Master Plan Process was intended to elicit as much public input as possible
regarding the future development and redevelopment of the Lionshead study area. This public input
process was launched at the March 4th Town Council meeting, and has included multiple opportunities for
wish list submissions as well as continuing oppartunities for evaluation and review of the wish list
submissions. In all, there were 173 different ideas submitted by the public. At the wish list public forums,
` and in the wish list newspaper advertisements, the public was encouraged to put a lot of thought into their
responses, and to consider the following questions in evaluating how their ideas would benefit and work for1
the Lionshead area:
1. Does the idea contribute to making Lionshead a wanner, more vibrant place for guests and
residents?
2. Does it expand or add activities and amenities?
3. Does it promote improved occupancy rates or the creation of new lodging products in Lionshead?
4. Does the idea improve the flow of pedestrian, vehicular, bicycle and mass transit traffic in
Lionshead? ' 5. Does it improve infrastructure and delivery of public and private services?
6. Does it include a creating financing mechanism?
It also needs to be stressed, as it was to the public in the different public forums, that all wish list ideas
needed to be evaluated as to how they helped accomplish the six approved Lionshead Policy Objectives.
These policy objectives are as follows:
1. Renewal and Redevelopment . . 2. Vitality and Amenities
3. Stronger economic base through increase "live beds"
4. Improved access and circulation
5. Improved infrastructure
6. Creative financing for enhanced private profits and public revenues
B. What has happened so far?
The work that has been accomplished in Stage II is as follows: , -,1. Wish List Input Public Forums. 'Two Stage II public input forums were held on March 16 and
March 18 to explain the stage II process and begin generating ideas for Lionshead. These forums,
attended by approximately 50 people, produced 78 ideas. These suggestions were recorded on
boards during the forums, and have been included in the comprehensive Stage II response list.
2. Wish List Submattals. In addition to the ideas received at the two public forums, 130 separate
wish list responses were submitted. ',Ajhen combined with the above mentioned forums, this
represents a total of 173 separate wish list items received from the public. These submissions have
been organized in the four categories described below, and are included in attachment "B" of this
memo.
v
a. ]Poflncy. Any suggestion or idea that relates to a framework for redevelopment, as opposed to
a specific redevelopment idea, is classified as a policy. Examples include changes in zoning,
development of architectural guidelines, requirement for locals housing as part of any
redevelopment, building height restrictions, and adoption of public view corridors.
lb. IFacllI9$lles. This category includes all specific ideas that involves built structures, although not
necessarily site specific. For example, there are many responses related to some type of
community/ conference/ performing arts center, but not all mentioned specific sites for such a
• facility. Other examples include a centralized service/ delivery facility, new structured parking
facilities, hotels, specific employee housing facilities, and a new ice arena: '
e. Ameenatnes. This category includes all other "built" ideas that do not involve structures, or
architecture. These ideas include parks, increased landscaping, enhanced streetscaping (benches,
lighting, etc..), enhanced pedestrian walkways, a new skier bridge, public art, and others.
d. Comaanengs/ Coneeruns. Some wish list responses articulated what the respondent did not
want, or specific concerns such as taller buildings, not wanting Lionshead to.look like Beaver
Creek, protecting the open space along Gore Creek, and the timing of garbage pick-up and other
service related functions.
3. "Express Yoaar Prefferences" I'ublic Forum. On April 2, a forum was held for the public to
articulate individual wish list "preferences". Each participant at the forum received 10 adhesive
dots to place on their favorite ideas. The purpose of this evaluation was to identify areas of
community intent and concern. These preferences expressed are documented in attachment "A" of
this memorandum.
4. "1GXpreSS JI OYHr 1C Y'efeH'eY1CeS99 Newspaper Opportunggees. The list of wish list ideas was also
published in the Vail Daily and Vail Trail, to encourage additional input from the public. As of 5
p.m. on April9th, 149 newspaper responses were received. These preferences expressed are
documented in attachment "A" of this memorandum.
C. Stage 11 CompGetuon Pu-oeess
Stage II public input has now been received, collated, and categorized. The next step is evaluation and
prioritization by the masterplanning team, the PEC/DRB, and the Town Council. In doing so, the
following questions should be considered:
1. How do the proposed ideas meet the 6 Lionshead Policy Objectives? (see attachment "B"
for consultant evaluation)
2. What preference, or opposition, has the public voiced regarding the proposed idea? (see
attachment "A")
3. What does the PEC/DRB see as important issues to be considered? This could regard a
specific wish list idea, or a category of ideas (for example, special attention may need to be
given to the issue of locals housing in general, not just one specific locals housing wish list
idea).
4. What ideas, if any, does the PEC/DRB think should not be given further consideration?
r
Regarding the above considerations, it is requested by the Lionshead Master Plan team that the PEC/DRB
take action on the following recommendations:
1. That the categorized wish list items articulated in attachment "B" be carried into stage III of
the master plan process for detailed study by the consultant and Master Plan team, or
a. That special consideration or priority be given to a particular wish list idea or
category of ideas.
b. That specific wish list ideas, if any, be removed from consideration in stage
III of the master plan process.
II. WISH LIST A12EAS OF SENSITIVITY
The following wish list ideas and suggestions have been flagged due to the following factors:
1. The amount of public response, negative or positive, relative to the issue
2. Potential conflicts with other wish list ideas 3. Potential for controversy
1. Use vs. Preservation of South Side of Gore Creek/ Existing Open Snace
The wish list responses dealing with the Gore Creek corridor varies from a desire for a park, trails and a
streamwalk to maintaining the entire area as a riparian preserve, with no development at all. There appears
to be strong views from both sides regardirig this issue. The idea for continuing the Vail Village
streamwalk to Lionshead will bring this "use vs. preservation" issue to the forefront.
2. Designation of Public View Conidors
The designation of public view corridors is part of the stage III process of the Lionshead Master Plan. This
issue may conflict with the following ideas/ issues
a. Desire to increase density/ building height in Lionshead
b. Desire to protect private views- this has been an issue throughout the process to this point, and
" will likely continue to be one. A ctear distinction must be made between public view corridors,
which this Master Plan will deal with, and private views, which the Master Plan has no control over.
c. Desire for new development that may conflict with a potential view corridor.
3. Buildin Heigh
The public response to restrict or maintain building heights is strong. This issue could conflict with other
desires to increase density, development or redevelopment of parcels, or the ability to use density as a
redevelopment incentive.
0
4. Architectural Style/ Guidelines
There were several wish list submissions requesting a more unified architectural theme/ strategy for
Lionshead. Several responses requested Austrian/ Alpine European, or other historic styles. In contrast
was a call for no specific architectural styles, but for guidelines dealing with materials and forms that still
allow for architectural creativity and diversity. Development of Architectural Guidelines are part of Stage
N of the masterplanning process. 5. Central Loading and deliverY
The idea of a centralized loading and delivery/ service dock is articulated in several different forms. The
-two most significant differences are a service facility for Lionshead, versus a service facility for the entire' Town of Vail. The potentially controversial issues involved with these ideas are:
a. Size and scope of facility- how big an area would it serve?
b. Could the same result be accomplished by setting up restricted service delivery times within the
Lionshead study area?
c. How would merchandise/ other goods be transported from central facility to final destination?
d. How would a central service/ delivery facility impact restaurants and other sensitive goods?
6. Recvcling of Construction Debris
This idea received several positive responses during the "preferences" forum, but cbuld be controversial for
the following reasons: `
a. This policy could constitute a significant cost of business increase to contractors, which would be
translated to development costs.
b. The ability to recycle construction debris could mean a potential upgrade expense to existing
recycling facilities.
c. Staging area requirements and construction time for projects could potentially be increased.
d. This policy could be logistically impossible to implement in Eagle County at this time.
7. Ice Rink Pro osals/ Use of East end of Parkin Structure
The proposals of constructing a new ice arena or upgrading Dobson Arena received a great amount of
public support in the "preferences" portion of stage II. The Vail Recreation District has submitted
preliminary architectural plans for both options, and has initiated a grassroots letter campaign.in favor of
this proposed use. However, the following submitted uses could conflict with this proposal:
- a. There were several proposals for using the east end of the parking structure as a conference
facility, a multi-purpose community center, and a performing arts center.
b. There was a proposal for constructing a new convention center in the current location of Dobson
Arena. 8. Vail Associates Core Propertv Redevelopment (Gondola buildin and Sunbird Lodge)
Vail Associates has submitted a proposal to redevelop these properties as a mixed use development,
inciuding lodging, hotel rooms, fractiona] fee or interval ownership, high density multi-family, retail, food
and beverage operations, ski base operations, service functions, and parking. The concern over the
redevelopment of this property has been significant, centering on the following issues:
a. Potential increase in density on site
b. Potential increase in building heights, blocking private views
c. Potential economic damage to condo developments on the north side of these properties due to
blocked private views.
1
The redevelopment of this property has the potential for the greatest single impact on the Lionshead area,
and is likely to generate significant amounts of public input, both positive and negative. This. area also has
the potential to impact, positively or negatively, pedestrian circulation patterns, vehicular circulation and
arrival, sun/shade areas, public view corridors, and open space.
9. Use of North and West dav lots
The potential use of these two Vail Associates owned properties was articulated in several differing wish
list responses. Vail Associates expressed a desire to rezone the North Day lot to allow for mixed use
development and a possible skier drop off at the Frontage Road, and to rezone the West Day Lot to permit
rnixed use development, including all uses currently compatible with Commercial Core 2, parking, - fractional fees or interval properties, high density multi-family, conference or meeting centers`and lodging
, and hotel rooms. Conflicting with this is the idea expressed in several other wish list submittals to
redevelop both of the parcels as public parking, perhaps developed in structures.
10. Private nropertv ri hts vs pedestrian connections and other public uses
There were several wish list submittals requesting that current privately held properties in Lionshead be
used for pedestrian pathways and other public uses such as open space or parks. For this to occur would
potentially require the acquisition of either easements or property by the Town of Vail, and could cause
controversy with existing land owners. - "
11. Pazking
The issue of parking resonated throughout almost all of the wish list submittals, with the major ideas
expressed being as follows:
a. De-emphasize the presence of the vehicle in Lionshead
b. Require that all new parking be either underground or outside of the study area. This scenario
could require central parking with some sort of transit system.
c. Offer development incentives for landowners to redevelop existing surface lots into structured
parking
d. Provide new public parking on the north and west day lots
• A policy of "no -net loss" of parking is stated in the approved Lionshead Master Plan work program. A
potential issue regarding this is that other than .the parking structure, the bulk of parking in Lionshead is
privately owned, as are parcels that the public suggested to be used as additional parking.
12. Relocation of South Frontage Road around Vail Associates Shops K,
This idea regards re-routing the south frontage road so that it remains adjacent to the I-70 right-of-way until is has passed the Vail Associates service yard, and would tie back into its existing location immediately
east of the Vail Professional Building. This concept, while very large in scope and potentially long term,
has the potential of greatly increasing the amount of contiguous developable parcels in western Lionshead.
This would require the involvement of CDOT agencies.
13. Potential use of Vail Associates unplatted tennis court site on south side of Gore Creek
Vail Associates submitted a wish list proposal that the unplatted tennis court site on south side of Gore
Creek be platted and zoned Commercial Core 2, permitting all uses of a revised Commercial Core 2 zoning
designation, including a fractional fee. VA suggested that an alternative use for this area might be rezoning
to single family residential, primary/secondary residential, residential cluster, low density, or medium
multi-family district. This concept is likely to generate controversy with the Forest Road property owners,
the Vail Recreation District, and any public currently using the tennis facilites.
14. Incentives for redevelonment
, Many wish list responses suggested using different incentive programs for property owners to redevelop, . the most popular being density trades. In response to this, several members of the public voiced concern. .
, that the amount of density increase necessary to fund significant redevelopment would be more that is desirable for Lionshead. Overall, the question of density elicited two different responses; the first being in
favor of increased density (one person made the statement "density equals vitality"), the second being
opposed to increased density. One wish list submittal went as far as to suggest that a population, or growth
cap should be placed on the Lionshead area.
15. Increased retail/ desire for more diversitv in retail
Several wish list submittals stated that the Lionshead area needs more "upscale" retail outlets and fewer t-
shirt shops. While almost all of the submittals favored a stronger, more diverse economic base for
Lionshead, existing merchants could potentially be offended or threatened by this suggestion.
16. Employee Housing
The amount of responses regarding the need for employee or locals housing was significant, both by mail-
in submittals and at almost every public forum held thus far. While the specific ideas regarding this issue
varied, the following ideas were consistent:
a. Absolutely no net loss of employee/ locals housing. This could cause controversy due to the fact
the bulk of existing employee housing in the study area is privately owned and is not deed-restricted
or required by code. -
b. Provide net increase in amount of employee/ locals housing.
c: At a minimum, provide a quantity of employee/ locals housing adequate to house all the
workforce in or based out of the Lionshead area. d. Provide seasonal employee housing.
e. Make sure that employee/ locals housing is quality, not a"slum".
f. Make employee/ locals housing a permitted use in the arterial business district.
g. Make regulations and policies regarding employee/ locals housing more flexible.
Several wish list responses and people at the public forums eapressed that they saw the issue of employee/
locals housing as the focal issue of not only Lionshead, but the entire town of Vail.
, 17. I-70 Air rights
The submitted idea of some day utilizing the air rights over the I-70 corridor, or a section of this corridor, is
without question the largest scale and longest term idea submitted. However, this concept would have the
potential of completely reshaping the north side of both Lionshead and the Vail Village. Given the
potential that this idea may sometime in the future become feasible, it is important to consider what it
would mean to all the other Lionshead and Vail Valley issues if this large amount of developable real estate
did become available.
f
18. Use of parking structure for public/ private purposes (development) . .
The proposed uses for the top of the parking structure, or the land it is built upon, has perhaps generated
more contentious public input than any other issue. The bulk of the negative response to this concept has
centered around the potential impact this might have on the views of surrounding land uses and residents.
In addition, the type of proposed use has generated many ideas, ranging from a large hotel facility to
employee/ locals housing to a conference/ convention center.
19. Conference/ Convention/ Performing arts/ Community/ Multi-pumose Center
Many wish list responses called for the construction of some version of a Conference/ Performing arts/
Community/ Multi-purpose Center. The primary locations suggested for these uses were the east end of the
parking structure, on top of the parking structure, and the west day lot. It is importarit fo articulate what
each of these uses is, and how they may or may not relate to each other as a logical combined use. A brief analysis of each is outlined below:
a. Multi-Purpose Community Center- This facility would be structured to cater to the local
public. It could contain a variety of uses such as a gymnasium, other athletic/ exercise facilities,
gathering spaces for local meetings (family reunions, public inputs forums, etc.), a small stage/
theater, a community computer room, or community/ civic offices. This facility would not be
targeted for use by out of town groups, but instead,would be an amenity to the local community.
b. Conference Center- As opposed to the community center, this facility would be structured to
cater to larger, out of town conferences. The primary function of this facility would be for
information/ educational events. This facility would typically contain one large auditorium space
with multi-media capabilities, 1-3 smaller auditorium facilities, plus several open meeting rooms
and break out spaces.
c. Performing Arts Center- The primary use of this facility would be a venue for the performing .
arts, and would serve both the local public and tourism industry. This facility could vary greatly in scope depending upon the amount of seating desired, the number and sizes of the venues, and the
type of events the facility would cater to.
d. Convention Center- This facility would most likely be the largest of these described facilities,
catering to large scale sales and display events. This facility would likely need a strong connection
to a major hotel, and would be composed primarily of large, open floor, sub-dividable spaces. The
target market of this facility would be large, multiple, out of town groups. ,
e. Multi-purpose Center- In theory, a multi-purpose facility could contain combinations of any of
the above uses, although this all depends on the size, location, and scope of the different component
facilities. A large scale convention center would be the most difficult facility to combine with any
other, due to its sheer size and staffing requirements. However, a performing arts center could also
be designed to function as conference space, and a community center also could contain an
auditorium to handle smaller scale conferences or local performing arts events.
~
In considering these different options for a major new facility in Lionshead or the Vail Valley, it is
important to consider the following:
a. What type of facility does the mazket most demand?
b. Is it a primary goal of the Town to increase local services and amenities, or to provide facilities to
draw larger tourist crowds and conventions?
c. What size of facility can the local population and projected tourism base support?
d What size of facility is there physically room for within the Lionshead study area or the Town of
Vail?
. 20. Issues/ Concerns outside of Liorishead Study Area It is important to note several wish list responses that called for a stronger connection between Lionshead
and the Vail Village. These ideas focused on the treatment of Meadow Drive, and ranged from providing a
separated, landscaped pedestrian corridor to constructing a continuous street level retail market. The
Meadow Drive corridor also elicited responses relating to vehiculaz traffic, specifically requesting that the
road be closed to private vehicles and redeveloped as a commercial/ pedestrian/ transit corridor. The idea
of not isolating Lionshead but instead creating one seamless village has been voiced by the public
throughout the Master Plan process.
Rlffe RNTlE~~DUcCTffON TO STAGE III
Upon Town Council acceptance or modification of the Stage II Wish List Items, the consultant and Master
Plan team will take an in-depth look at each wish list item. It is in this stage that the stage I data will be put
to use, as the team evaluates each wish list idea. The criteria to be used for this evaluation will include, but
is not limited to, the following:
1. How does the proposed idea satisfy the six Lionshead Policy Objectives?
2. How does the proposed idea help meet the urban design guidelines articulated in the
approved Master Plan work program?
3. , Haw does the proposed idea help solve or alleviate existing problems identified during
Stage I ?
4. How does the proposed idea relate to opportunities or constraints identified during Stage I?
5. How do the different proposed ideas relate to one another and work together? What
potential conflicts may exist between proposed ideas?
6. How does the proposed idea relate to and work with the existing urban fabric of Lionshead?
7. What impact, good or bad, would the proposed idea have on existing service, transit, and
public infrastructure?
8. What economic impact, good or bad, would the proposed idea have on the overall Lionshead
market?
9. Does the Vail market or demographic profile support the need for the proposed idea?
10. Can the proposed idea physically fit within the Lionshead study area?
11. If the proposed use does not seem feasible given the current land-use configuration and
economic market, would it be feasible in the future, and under what conditions?
i.
Consultant 1Vlemorandum
L~ONSHEAD MAST~R-PLAN
STAGE ~1
TOWN ~F VAIL ~
P]LANNING AND ENVIRONMIEl~TAL COMMIS SION
D]ESIGN REVIEW BOARD
WISH[L~ST - PROGRAM DEVELOPMEIVT UPDATE
ATTACHlrlENT 66A99
flpu-i0 fl fl, 1997
Attachment "A"
Public Freference Response to Wish List Ideas
Below are listed the submitted wish list items that received preference "dots" either as part of the April2nd
forum or from mailed in newspaper responses. Please note that this does not represent a statistically
accurate or scientifically structured polling. This is purely a representation of the opions of the people or
interest groups that went to the effort to let thier preferences be known. The items below are listed in the
catergories by which they were presented to the public, and the order of appearance does not represent
, ranking.. The "R" reference at the end of each item refers to the number of the complete wish list response.
These complete responses are included as attachment "C" to this memo. -
Preference PROPOSED WISH LIST IDEAS
Responses
News- Public , POLICY
Paper Forums ,
EMPLOYEE HOUSING
18 1• Employee Housing, focusing on seasonal housing (R100)
20 29 Maintain and increase number of employee housing on outer edge of Lionshead (R104)
11 28 • Provide for significant net increase in locals housing (R144, 66)
6 2• Provision for employee housing in immediate vicinity of Lionshead for at least 100
employees.(R149)
1 2• Employee housing should be considered a permitted use, rather than a conditional use in
the arterial commercial district, specifically for the Holy Cross parcel.(R156)
4 4• Employee housing unit designations as defined in the Vail code should be rendered more
fleaible, allowing for a broader variety of employee housing unit types. (R156)
3 4• Provide employee housing, based on demand, which would also bring more vitality and
ownership, less cyclical use of the area (R3)
1 • Improve housing types for employee housing
10 1• Employee housing integrated in the core
15 • Provide seasonal employee housing on Lionshead parking structure (R100)
ZONING
2 1• Rezone north day lot to allow for mixed use development, possible skier drop-off, mass
transit connection to VA core parcels (R152)
2• Consider rezoning of parking structure, Lionshead circle, and I-70 air rights to allow for
wide variety of uses, both private and public (R153)
1 • Rezone south side of Lionshead parking structure to allow for street level retail uses with
residential housing above, coupled with pedestrian enhancements (R154)
2 1• Rezone west day.lot to permit mixed use development-including all uses compatible
Commercial Core 2 zoning, parking, variety of residential products, conference/ meeting
centers, lodging/ hotel rooms (R155)
1 v Relocate S. Frontage road and combine west day lot with VA service center and Holy
Cross parcel. Rezone area as Commercial Core 2(R157)
1 5 o Unplatted tennis court site south of skier bridge- plat and zone as Commercial Core 2,
including fractional fee. Alternate uses- range of residential products. (R158)
r
News- Public
Paper Forums
1 o Expand or amend the Commercial Core 2 zone to include, permit, and allow for high
density multi-family and SDD zoned projects (R162)
1 o Allow restaurants and vendors to use more public space (R28)
3 o Mixed Use redevelopment of gondola and Sunbird lodge properties, including lodging,
hotel rooms, fractional fee or interval ownership, high density multi-family, retail, food
and beverage operations, ski base operations, service functions, parking.(R 15 1)
. DENSI'll'Y/ DIEVlE1C.OPMEN'g' gNCENTIVES . .
4 o Through density bonuses or other incentives or through the power of eminent domain the
Concert Hall Plaza building should be redeveloped and a direct, open, effective pedestrian
corridor created from the Lionshead plaza directly to the west in the vicinity of the
Marriott. (R164)
2 3 o The master plan and the zoning ordinances which arise from it should permit or allow for
density bonuses in consideration for property owners or developers undertaking or making
development commitments which benefit or serve public policies. (R163, 102)
1 o Changes in density and infill regulations to reflect redevelopment plan objectives (R20)
RETAdL/ COMMERCIA]L.
8 4 o Increased retail presence, less t-shirt & sport shops- 30,000 s.f. total (R97)
10 4 o Encourage interesting/ diverse/ exciting retail enterprises (R99)
BUILDING ]H[lEIGH'g'/ A1tCHITIEC"TL1RAL GgJY~ELI1VES
1 o More uniformity in building facades- Austrian architecture (R103)
5 9 o Establish firm building height limitations and view corridors (R104)
5 1 o More Alpine/Austrian architecture and decoration (R1)
3 2 o Improve architectural and visual quality (R45)
l 3 o Maximum height of new building same as Sundance (R67)
2 4 o Limit building height of new buildings on South side of Landmark (R68)
3 o Select aesthetic style - mining / alpine / old west / national park / Colorado west
2 l. o Design guidelines should allow creativity and discourage repetition - focus on materials
TRANSPORTATION/ CI12CvLATpON
3 o Add parking to parking structure (R62, 1)
1 o Maintain North day lot parking with access to Landmark as is (R67)
3 1 o Efficient skier drop off (R53)
1 o Limit use of Forest Road by VA (R44)
2 0 Centralized deliveries (R52)
1 o Separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic (R54)
1 o Reduce vehicular presence in lionshead
]LANDSCA1PING/ STRlE]ETSCAPE AMENITdES
2 2 o Quality landscaping and landscape maintenance (R18)
2 0 Improve design and quality of lighting (R41)
2 0 Replace deteriorated rock walls, trash receptacles, benches and pavers (R42)
. ~
News- Public
Paper Forums
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION/ ACCESS ISSUES
2 • Require private property connections to bike and pedestrian ways (R32)
1 • Better use of the North day lot, and its stairway (R43)
19 Proper snow melting/removal and drainage (R39)
2 • Encourage new pedestrian ways through private property
OTHER
2 4• Implement and encourage lots of street entertainment (R101)
_ 2• Public arts funding/ program as Lionshead is redeveloped (R108) 3 2• Keep walking trails maintained in winter for non-skiers (R134)
1• Market Vail and Lionshead as "total" experience, not separately (R142)
2 2• Strengthen sense of arrival through enhancing "gates" to Lionshead (R9)
1 • Provide visual access to the mountain (R18)
1• Encourage more identifiable entrance to the village of Lionshead (R23)
2 9• Recycling of any tear-down (R69)
29 Redesign entry into Lionshead from parking structure (R70)
5 6• Add sense of arrival and sense of place to Lionshead (R72)
2 2• Allow small outdoors concerts in plaza (R30)
3 • Limit population growth
1 • Acquisition of open space by Town of Vail
FACILITY `
,
COMMUNITY CENTER/ MULTI-PURPOSE FACILITY
10 • Community hall with facilities for conventions, parties, entertainment (R97)
11 3• Multi purpose Conference center (R 122)
3 • Civic center with performing arts center on east end of parking structure (R128)
14 15 • New gymnastics facility/ shared space with other facility (R138)
5 • Turn east end of parking structure into complete civic complex- community center/
conference center/ town offices and council chamber (R142)
11 19 The east end of the parking structure, cunently a surface lot, should be considered as a
potential for a second ice rinl:, a community center, and multi-purpose or function
performance and conference facilities. (R159)
22 30 o Provide larger youth center (R 133)
17 a State of the art visitors center with short term parking (Rl 15)
2 o New multi purpose town liall on old gondola building site (R13)
14 11 o Community center for sport/cultural activities, possible child care (R16)
5 m Small scale community center (750-1250 seats) instead of 2500-3500 seat operation near
Dobson arena (R75)
6 • Community center and performance area, with 200-250 seats (R76), near pobson arena
(R76)
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
25 3• 300-400 seat performing arts center with gymnasium & multi purpose uses (R107, 147)
12 2 • Indoor performance center/ performing arts center (R123, 100)
t
News- Public
Paper Forums
~~NF~~NC~ ~~~ILITIES .
7 o Conference facility on east end of parking structure (R109)
4 o Multi-media center associated with conference facility (R116)
5 o High-tech conference center near hotel (R12)
8 6 o Convention center on top of parking structure (R56)
5 o Build new convention center instead of Dobson arena (R60)
ICIE FACIILITd]ES
' 23 117 o New ice hockey rink on east end of parking structure (R 114,112,136,150,166,16) `
- 5 82 o Expand Dobson ice arena to the south and east end as well as interior improvements it .
increase seating capacity (R165)
lEMPLOY]EE ]Ell[OU~ING
17 o Relocate TOV municipal structure and use land for locals housing (R142)
33 10 0 3 to 4 story employee housing on top of existing VA service yard, with underground
parking (R10)
]H[O'g'EIL/ ]LODGING
12 9 o New hotel on gondola and Sunbird lodge site- 100 rooms (R97)
11 7 o Replace Sunbird Lodge and Gondola Building with five star ski-in/ski-out hotel, 3 to 5
stories, separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic (R8)
11 2 o Hotel with full conference amenities / IMAX/theater (R17)
TR1NSPORTATdON/ C'I1~CULA'I'I0N
11 3 o Truck delivery terminal for both Lionshead and Vail Village (R124)
5 2 o If parking necessary, provide structures on west and north day lots, or expand existing
facility (R125)
2 1 o Locate regional mass transit center at parking structure (R126)
. 5 o _ West day lot - provide public parking 11 o Regional transportation center at west day lot -
O'Il'HER
26 2 o I-MAX center in new performing arts center (R107)
10 o Grocery store like Alfalfas in core of Lionshead with movie theater (R112)
23 o Planetarium (R139)
18 3 o Children's museum (R139)
13 4 o Wet-n-wild water park (R 139)
g o Skiing, Oil, 5ports museum (R 139)
3 o Small/ high tech television studio in "beachfront" location (R140)
4 0 Mixed use redevelopment of Gondola building and Sunbird lodge properties (R151)
9 0 Vending kiosks throughout Lionshead pedestrian area (R6)
4 0 Grocery/convenience store, and pharmacy within walking distance (R14)
g 0 Commercial/office space on top of parking structure (R57)
70 0 Tennis club facility
tf~
News- Public Paper Forums
, . AMENITY: : . . ; . .
SHIER BRIDGE
22 4• Rebuild skier bridge with "stunning" azchitectural design (R110, 46)
4 • Add skier bridge next to Forest Road bridge (R63)
12 19 Pedestrian winter access on skier bridge
RECREATION
11 • Inline skating park, ice skating in winter- 1/4 mile track (R97) .
28 5• Provide basketball court (R111) 114 6• Separate skate boarding park (R137)
TRANSPORTATION/ CI1ltCULATION
1 • Provide frequent, reliable and courteous bus transit. (R104)
1 • Entry sign into parking structure (R118)
6 • East bound I-70 exit ramp west of Lionshead (R127)
4 • Round-a-bouts at key intersections from Vail round-a-bout to west Lionshead entrance
(R127)
6 • Minimize conflict between VA mountain service access and established residential areas
(R131)
5 • Improve circulation at existing regional bus stop- add skier drop-off (R145)
18 I• Bury vehicular traffic at west end of parking structure to eliminate conflicts (R146)
10 10 • The Frontage Road should be improved through the Lionshead area including repaving,
formalization of a pedestrian path along its length, landscape improvements, the
introduction of turning lanes and entry or other identifying signage for the Lionshead area.
(R161)
2 2• Provide designated skier drop-off areas
PARK/PLAYGROUND
20 • Park/ playground on south side of Gore Creek across from Treetops (R113)
15 2• Renovate/ replace Lionshead park/ playground area (R132) 2 • Park near Lionshead children's ski school (R135)
3 • Open air theater, with open grassy slope and seating under roof (R13)
7 4• Green gathering space for small concerts, playgrounds, minigolf (RS)
12 1 o Children's playground (R1 1), xN~ithin walking distance of any point in Lionshead (Rl 1,
18)
19 2 o Small amphitheater in main plaza (R26)
9 o Add more entries, seating and gathering spots to Lionshead mall (R50)
15 o Park on top of parking structure (R56)
OPEN SPACE
24 7 e Establish wildlife and riparian habitat nature preserves between Lionshead and Vail
Village (R130)
e
1
News- Public
Paper Forums
3 3 o Riparian stream enhancement should be made to Gore Creek in the Lionshead area
including structural enhancements for fish habitat and perhaps the creation of ponds and
enhanced wetlands in or adjacent to the current stream tract owned by the town. In
addition, in those azeas where the stream walk has been built from the library to the
sewage treatment plant, landscaping improvements along the stream bank should be
implemented. (R160)
, 35 1 o Gore Creek trail with access points (R18) -
' S o Expand "beach" in front of old gondola building (R21)
2 3 o Access to Gore Creek over whole length of Lionshead (R49) ^
6 1 o Improved pedestrian access and vehicular circulation between Lionshead and parking
structure (R 18)
7 o Redesign Concert Hall plaza, eliminating the bus stop and improving the pedestrian
access to the parking structure (R59)
11 o Develop area by Lion Square Lodge as new drop off for out of town buses and cars (R61)
28 1 o Adopt comprehensive signage plan to direct pedestrians more efficiently (R73)
]L,ANDSCAIPING/ STRIEETSCA1PE AMENgTY
30 o More benches, landscaping and artwork (R103)
12 o New light fixtures (R22)
1 o Centralized community compactor/dumpster for core area (R38)
5 o Heated bus shelter with info booth, replacing the existing info bunker (RS 1)
46 o Expanded ski storage (R2)
2 0 15' high bronze lion statue as unifying theme, with 200 fiberglass copies and lion inspired
decorations in and around Lionshead (R13)
14 o Small fountain/wading area to bring life, activity in front of Montaneros building, = firepit
in winter (R7)
g 0 Fountain or water feature in plaza areas (R27)
5 o Enhance the existing fountain (R47)
, g o Redesign and improvements of the landscape in the Lionshead mall (R48) '
PIEDESTRl[AN CII~CU]LATION .
9 o Pedestrian bridge from parking structure to mall entrance (R97)
7 14 o West Meadow drive streetscape plan to improve pedestrian safety- divert non-essential
vehicular traffic (R 129)
15 4 o Pedestrian, landscaped 8-10' walkway between Lionshead and Vail Village (R4)
28 4 o Walkway all the way along Gore Creek from Lionshead to Vail (R15)
3 0 Bicycle route.through, not around Lionshead-(-R31)
5 0 Povide more sidewalks, pedestrian corridors
OTHER
15 4 o Environmentally friendly mall like Boulders Pearl St. (R105)
11 o Farmers market with flower stalls/ fresh fruiU gazebo for band (Rl 17)
1 o Provide space for quite restaurant serving three meals (R134)
31 0 Consider second and third story "skywalks" between buildings (R25)
~
News- Public
Paper Forums
1• Provide ADA compliant, accessible public restrooms with improved signage
,
, .
- . . otnmen _s: oncerns
1 • Lionshead is fine- no redevelopment needed (R98)
1 • Improve area with no new taxes (R98)
1 • Why is garbage pickup so early in morning? (R103)
15 • Grave concerns over height of new VA buildings (R106)
6 • View corridors and landscaping are critical (R106) _
, 2 • Increased height of VA buildings would damage economic success of I;ifthouse Condos
(R 120)
6 3• Better integrate Vail and Lionshead- one village, not two (R141)
4 • Integrate Concert Hall Plaza and west Lionshead into Lionshead core (R141)
4 • Get rid of "tourist information bunker"- use it or lose it! (R142)
1 • Get rid of or at least hide/ landscape RV parking lot- it is eyesore and dangerous (R143)
13 1• No more big hotels in Lionshead- enforce original zoning heights (R148)
7• No stream walk to east of Lionshead
17 1 • Keep Vail small - do not over build
~
Consultant 1Vlemorandum
LION5~~~ ~~~~~RPLAN
5TAGE 11
TOWN OF VAIL
PLANNING AND ENVIROIVMENT'AL COMMISSI0N
DESIGN REVIEW ~OARD
WISHI,IST - PIL~~GRAM DEV]EI,OPMENT UPDATE
ATTACH1V'dENT 66B99
Ape-u0 11, 1997
~
A¢$achment 66im99
11?
Sgage 11 Wnsh List Respouusese PoQicy Ob,gective Analysis
Below is the complete categorized record of the Stage II wish list responses. Each item has been evaluated
by the masterplan team for its responsiveness to the six approved Lionshead Policy Objectives, which are
outlined below.
. 1. Renewal & Redevelopment
2. Vitality & Amenities
3. Increased Live Beds ~
4. Access and Circulation
5. Improved Infrastructure
6. Enhanced Private Profits and Public Revenues
Renewal Vitaliry Increased Access Improved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- Profiu &
opment Amenities Circulation structure Public
Revenues
~~P LOYEE ~~~~~NG
• Employee Housing, focusing on seasonal housing
(R 100)
• Maintain and increase number of employee housing
on outer edge of Lionshead (R 104)
Fr ovidefor signifcant net increase in locals housing 144, 66)
ovision for employee housing in immediate
vicinity of Lionshead for at least 100
employees.(R 149)
• Employee housing should be considered a permitted ~
- use, rather.than a conditional use in the arterial
commercial district, specifically for the Holy Cross
parcel.(R 156)
ruallowinng Employee housing unit designations as defined in
he Vail code should be rendered more flexible,
f
or a broader variety of employee housing
nit types. . (R156)
0 Provide employee housing, based on demand, which
would also bring more vitality and ownership, less
cyclical use of the area (R3)
a Improve housing types for employee housing
o Employee housing integrated in the core
0 Provide seasonal employee housing on Lionshead
parking structure (R 100)
. ~
Renewal Vitality Increased Access Improved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra-, Profiu &
opment Amenities Circulation sWcture Public
ZONING Revenues
• Rezone north day lot to allow for mixed use
development, possible skier drop-off, mass transit
connection to VA core parcels (R152)
• Consider rezoning of parking structure, Lio4head
circle, and I-70 air rig
hts to allow for wide uses, both private and public (R153) • Rezone south side of Lionshead parking str
allow for street level retail uses with residential
housing above, coupled with pedestrian
enhancements (R 154)
• Rezone west day lot to permit mixed use
development including all uses compatible
Commercial Core 2 zoning, parking, variety of
residential products, conference/ meeting centers,
lodging/ hotel rooms (R155)
• Relocate S. Frontage road and combine west day lot
with VA service center and Holy Cross parcel.
Rezone area as Commercial Core 2(R 157)
• Unplatted tennis court site south of skier bridge- plat
and zone as Commercial Core 2, including fractional
fee. Alternate uses- range of residential products.
(R158)
• Expand or amend the Commercial Core 2 zone to
include, permit, and allow for high density multi-
family and SDD zoned projects (R162)
• Allow restaurants and vendors to use.more public
space (R28)
• Allow and encourage redevelopment to cross
existing lot lines to improve circulation (R71)
• Test development opportunities south of Gore Creek ~
• Mixed Use redevelopment of gondola and Sunbird
lodge properties, including lodging, hotel rooms,
fractional fee or interval ownership, high density
multi-family, retail, food and beverage operations, ---ski base operations, service functions,
parking.(R151)
e
Renewal Vitality Increased Access Improved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & lnfra- Profits &
opment Amenities Circulation structure Public
~~~EL~~~~NT ~NCENTIVES Revenues
o Through density bonuses or other incentives or
through the power of eminent domain the Concert
Hall Plaza building should be redeveloped and a
direct, open, effective pedestrian corridor created
. from the Lionshead plaza directly to the west in the ,
vicinity of the Marriott. (R164)
0 The master plan and the zoning ordinances which
arise from it should permit or allow for density
bonuses in consideration for property owners or
developers undertaking or making development
commitments which benefit or serve public policies.
(R163, 102)
0 Changes in density and infill regulations to reflect
redevelopment plan objectives (R20)
o Provide financial incentives to modify surface
parking
RIETAIL/ cnmNiEYZfr'dA1L
o Increased retail presence, less t-shirt & sport shops-
30,000 s.f. total (R97) ~
o Encourage interesting/ diverse/ exciting retail
enterprises (R99) ~
o Provide opportunities for "storefront" activity along
West Meadow drive (R142)
BY1gLDING HEgGH'd'/ ARCHI'g']ECTURA]L
Gg7I~ELINES .
• More uniformity in building facades- Austrian
architecture (R103) ~
o Establish firm building height limitations and view
corridors (R 104)
~
• More Alpine/Austrian architecture and decoration
(R1) ~
o Provide recommendations. to redevElop West day lot
into visually more attractive space, anchoring it as ~
the West end of Lionshead (R24)
• Improve visual character of parking structure (R33)
• Improve architectural quality of ski lifts, using ~
natural materials (R34)
o Improve architectural and visual quality (R45)
~
v
Renewal Vitality Increased Access lmproved ivate
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- fits &
opment Amenities Circulation swcture blic
:;R:evenues
• Ma~cimum height of new building same as Sundance (R67)
• Limit building height of new buildings on South
side of Landmark (R68)
• Select aesthetic style - mining / alpine / old west
national park / Colorado west
, • Design guidelines should allow creativity and
discourage repetition - focus on materials
TRANSPORTATION/ CIRCULATION
• Add parking to parking structure (R62, 1)
• Maintain North day lot pazking with access to
Landmark as is (R67)
• Revise town bus routing to avoid conflict with
pedestrians (R55)
• Efficient skier drop off (R53) ~ ~ ? ~
• Provide emergency and maintenance vehicle access
(R40)
• Limit use of Forest Road by VA (R44) ~
• Centralized deliveries (R52)
• Separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic (R54)
• Reduce vehicular presence in lionshead ~ ~ ?
• LimiUrestrict service delivery (time block) ~
LANDSCAPING/ STREETSCAPE AMENITIES
• Quality-landscaping and landscape maintenance
(R1.8) _
• Improve design and quality of lighting (R41)
• Replace deteriorated rock walls, trash receptacles,
benches and pavers (R42)
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION/ ACCESS ISSUES
• Require private property connections to bike and
pedestrian ways (R32)
• Better use of the North day lot, and its stairway
(R43)
• Snowmelt all pedestrian walkways (R65)
• Proper snow melting/removal and drainage (R39)
• Encourage new pedestrian ways through private
property
P
Renewal Vitaliry Increased Access Improved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- Profits &
opment Amenities Circulation swcture Public
OTHER Revenues
o Implement and encourage lots of street ~
entertainment (R 101)
o Public arts funding/ program as Lionshead is ~
redeveloped (R108)
o Keep walking trails maintained in winter for non-
' skiers (R134) .
0 Market Vail and Lionshead as "total" experience, ~ .
not separately (R 142)
o Strengthen sense of arrival through enhancing
"gates" to Lionshead (R9)
o Provide visual access to the mountain (R18) ~ ?
o Encourage more identifiable entrance to the village j ~ ?
of Lionshead (R23)
o Allow main mall area of Lionshead to be open ~
alcohol consumption during certain times (R29)
o Use money from sale of public land encroachments
to private development for public projects (R36)
FRed:e-sign locations and appropriate design for
er boxes and trash cans (R37)
g of any tear-down (R69)
entry into Lionshead from parking
structure (R70)
• Add sense of arrival and sense of place to Lionshead
(R72)
o Provide activities other than ski-oriented, such as
gathering spaces, at periphery (R74) _
o Allow small.outdoors concerts in plaza (R30) ~
o Strategic marketing efforts tazgeting Lionshead ~
o Limit population growth
• Acquisition of open space by Town of Vail ~
1
Renewal Vitaliry Increased Access Improved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & [nfra- Profits &
opment Amenities Circulation swcture Public .
Revenues
, FACILITY:: ;
COMMUNITY CENTER/ MYJLTI-PURPOSE
FACILITY
• Community hall with facilities for conventions,
parties, entertainment (R97)
: . • Multi purpose Conference center (R122)
• Civic center with performing arts center on east end
of parking structure (R128)
• New gymnastics facility/ shared space with other
facility (R138)
• Turn east end of parking structure into complete
civic complex- community center/ conference
center/ town offices and council chamber (R 142)
• The east end of the parking structure, c;urrently a
surface lot, should be considered as a potential for a
second ice rink, a community center, and multi-
purpose or function performance and conference
facilities. (R159)
~ Provide larger youth center (R133)
• State of the art visitors center with short term
parking (R115)
• New multi purpose town hall on old gondola
building site (R13)
• Community center for sport/cultural activities,
possible child care (R16)
• Small scale community center (750-1250 seats)
instead.of 2500-3500 seat operation near pobson - arena (R75)
~ Community center and performance area, with 200-
250 seats (R76), near pobson arena (R76)
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
• 300-400 seat performing arts center with
gymnasium & multi purpose uses (R107, 147)
• Indoor performance center/ performing arts center
(R123, 100)
0
vate
Renewal Vitality Increased Access ?mproved :Reven.
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- its &
opment Amenities Circulation structure blic
es
CO~1~'1
ERlEl~1CE FA~Cg~.I~'gES o Conference facility on east end of parking structure
(R 109)
o Multi-media center associated with conference
facility (R116)
, o High-tech conference center near hotel (R 12)
0 Convention center on top of pazking structure (R56)
0 Build new convention center instead of Dobson
arena (R60)
gCE lF'ACI1LITIES
o New ice hockey rink on east end of parking structure
(R 114,112,136,150,166,16)
o Expand Dobson ice arena to the south and east end
as well as interior improvements it increase seating .
capacity (R165)
EMPILOYEE HOUSING
o Relocate TOV municipal structure and use land for
locals housing (R142)
0 3 to 4 story employee housing on top of existing VA
service yard, with underground parking (R 10)
I-IOTEL/ LODGg1VG
o New hotel on gondola and Sunbird lodge site- ] 00
rooms (R97)
- 0 Replace Sunbird Lodge and Gondola Building with
five star ski-in/ski-out hotel, 3 to 5 stories,
separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic (R8)
0 Hotel with full conference amenities / IMAX/theater ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
(R 17)
0 Central check-in / parking with free shuttle for bags
and people
[TRANSPORTATION/ ~C~~2~~J]C,E1'~'IOI~1
Truck delivery terminal for both Lionshead and Vail
Village (R124)
o If parking necessary, provide structures on west and ~ ~ ~ ?
north day lots, or expand existing facility (R125)
• Locate regional mass transit center at parking
structure (R 126)
. ~
Renewal Vitality Increased Access Improved Priva[e
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- Profits &
opment Amenities Circulation swcwre Public
Revenues
• West day lot - provide public parking
• Regional transportation center at west day lot
OTHER
• I-MAX center in, new performing arts center (R 107)
. • Grocery store like Alfalfas in core of Lionshead ~with movie theater (R 112) -
` • Planetarium (R139)
• Children's museum (R139)
0 Wet-n-wild water park (R139)
• Skiing, Oil, Sports museum (R139)
• Small/ high tech television studio in "beachfront"
location (R140)
• Mixed use redevelopment of Gondola building and
Sunbird lodge properties (R151)
0 Vending kiosks throughout Lionshead pedestrian
area (R6)
• Grocery/convenience store, and phannacy within
walking distance (R14)
• Commercial/office space on top of parking structure
(R57)
• Tennis club facility ~ A
AMEIVITY ,
SKIER BRIDGE
• Rebuild skier bridge with "stunning" architectural
design (R 110, 46)
• Add skier bridge next to Forest Road bridge (R63)
• Pedestrian winter access on skier bridge
RECREATION
• Inline skating park, ice skating in winter- 1/4 mile
track (R97)
• Provide basketball court (R111)
• Separate skate boarding park (R137) O ~
D
Renewal Vitaliry Increased Access Improved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- Profits &
opment Amenities Circulation swcture Public
Revenues
TRAN.~~~RTa~~~~~~ ~~~~ULATION
o Provide frequent, reliable and courteous bus transit.
(R104)
0 Entry sign into parking structure (R118)
o East bound I-70 exit ramp west of Lionshead (R127)
. o Realignment of s. frontage road north and west of ~ ~ ~ ~ •
VA maintenance facility (R127)
0 Round-a-bouts at key intersections from Vail round-
a-bout to west Lionshead entrance (R127)
o Minimize conflict between VA mountain service
, access and established residential areas (R 131)
o Improve circulation at existing regional bus stop- ~ ~ ? ~
add skier drop-off (R145)
o Bury vehicular traffic at west end of parking
structure to eliminate conflicts (R146)
o The Frontage Road should be improved through the ~ ~ ~ ?
Lionshead area including repaving, formalization of
a pedestrian path along its length, landscape
improvements, the introduction of turning lanes and
entry or other identifying signage for the Lionshead
area. (R 161)
o Provide designated skier drop-off areas ~ ~ ? ~
PARK/ P1LAXGROU1VD
o Park/ playground on south side of Gore Creek across ~
from Treetops (R113)
• Renovate/ replace Lionshead park/ playground area
- (R132)
o Park near Lionshead children's ski school (R135)
• Open air theater, with open grassy slope and seating
under roof (R13)
• Green gathering space for small concerts,
playgrounds, minigolf (RS)
• Children's playground (R11), within walking
distance of any point in Lionshead (R1 1, 18)
• Small amphitheater in main plaza (R26)
o Add more entries, seating and gath:::pots to
Lionshead mall (R50)
o Park on top of parking structure (R56) ~ ~
e
Renewal Vitaliry Increased Access lmproved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & lnfra- Profits &
opment Amenities Circulation swcture Public
OPEN SPACE Revenues
• Establish wildlife and riparian habitat nature ?
preserves between Lionshead and Vail Village
(R130)
• Riparian stream enhancement should be made to
, Gore Creek in the Lionshead area including
structural enhancements for fish habitat and perhaps .
the creation of ponds and enhanced wetlands in or
adjacent to the current stream tract owned by the
town. In addition, in those areas where the stream
walk has been built from the library to the sewage
treatment plant, landscaping improvements along
the stream bank should be implemented. (R 160)
• Gore Creek trail with access points (R18) ~ e o
• Expand "beach" in front of old gondola building ~ e
(R21)
• Access to Gore Creek over whole length af ~ ~ ~ ?
Lionshead (R49)
• Improved pedestrian access and vehicular
circulation between Lionshead and parking structure
(R18)
• Redesign Concert Hall plaza, eliminating the bus
stop and improving the pedestrian access to the
parking structure (R59)
• Develop area by Lion Square Lodge as new drop off
for out of town buses and cars (R61)
• Adopt comprehensive signage plan to direct
pedestrians more efficiently (R73) "
LANDSCAPING/ STREETSCAPE AMENIT1'
• More benches, landscaping and artwork (R103)
• New light fixtures (R22) ? ~ ~
• Centralized community compactor/dumpster for ? ~ ~
core area (R38)
• Heated bus shelter with info booth. replacing the
existing info bunker (R51)
• Expanded ski storage (R2)
• 15' high bronze lion statue as unifying therne, with
200 fiberglass copies and lion inspired decorations
in and around Lionshead (R 13)
+
rivate
Renewal Vitality Increased Access Improved :Revenues
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- fits &
opment Amenities Circulation swcture ublic
o Small fountain/wading area to bring life, activity in
front of Montaneros building, = firepit in winter
(R7)
o Fountain or water feature in plaza areas (R27)
o Enhance the existing fountain (R47)
o Redesign and improvements of the landscape in the
_ • Lionshead mall (R48)
PLEDESTRIAN CIRCU][.,ATION
• Pedestrian bridge from parking structure to mall
entrance (R97)
• West Meadow drive streetscape plan to improve ~ ~ ~ ?
pedestrian safety- divert non-essential vehicular
traffic (R 129)
o Pedestrian, landscaped 8-10' walkway between
Lionshead and Vail Village (R4)
• Walkway all the way along Gore Creek from
Lionshead to Vail (R15)
• Bicycle route through, not around Lionshead (R3 ] ) ~ ~ ? ~
• Povide more sidewalks, pedestrian corridors ~ ~ ? ~
O'd'HIER
0 Environmentally friendly mall like Boulders Pearl
St. (R105)
0 Farmers market with flower stalls/ fresh fruit/
gazebo for band (R117)
• Provide space for quite restaurant serving three
meals (R 134) -
• Consider second and third story "skywalks" between
buildings (R25)
• Provide ADA compliant, accessible public
restrooms with improved signage
s.
~
Renewal Vitality Increased Access Improved Private
& Redevel- & Live Beds & Infra- Profits &
opment Amenities Circulation svucture Public
Revenues
omaments : _ oncerns
0 Lionshead is fine- no redevelopment needed (R98)
• Improve area with no new taxes (R98)
~
• Why is garbage pickup so early in morning? (R103)
0 Grave concerns over height of new VA buildings
(R106)
• View corridors and landscaping are critical (R106) ~
• Provide "Crime prevention through envii•onmental ~
design" specialist to be part of masterplan team
(R119)
• Increased height of VA buildings would damage
economic success of Lifthouse Condos (R120)
• Creative "re-engineering" of existing structures is ~
necessary (R123)
• Better integrate Vail and Lionshead- one village, not
two (R 141)
• Integrate Concert Hall Plaza and west Lionshead
into Lionshead core (R141)
• Get rid of "tourist information bunker"- use it or
lose it! (R142)
* Get rid of or at least hide/ landscape RV parking lot-
it is eyesore and dangerous (R143)
• Lionshead is not unattractive now- some buildings
more attractive than Vail (R147)
• No more big hotels in Lionshead- enforce original
zoning heights (R148)
• No stream walk to east of Lionshead
0 Keep Vail small - do not over build
4
Consultant 1Vlemorandum
LIOIVS~EAD MASTERP]LAN
STAGE ~R
TOWN OF VAIL
PLAIVNIIVG AIVD ENVIRONME1VTAL COMMISSION
DESIGIV REZTIEW BOARD
WISHILgST e PROGRA1VI DEVELOPMEIVT UPDATE
ATTACHMENT 66C99
~prIlll fl Y, ll 99.7
~
1Lionshead Redevelopment
Stage 'd'wo Wash List Responses
Response 1
Overview: Lionshead needs to look Alpine - like an Austrian village with gingerbread type decorations - white
buildings, dark brown trim the way the Village used to look!
Scope/Size: No room to put a major facility like a performing arts center.
Financing by.• The Lionshead businesses would finance this.
Objective
advanced: Lionshead needs to be more people-friendly.
Primary/secondary
uses: Car parking is a hassle, too. Skiing and eating are the only reasons to go there.
Access
requirements: Lots more parking. Yes! to a passenger drop-off.
Architectural/Site
studies: Old Austrian style would be very nice. Lots of flowers and drawings on buildings.
Cost studies: Use architectural classes and intern students.
Feasibiliry
studies: Try not to raise any more taxes.
Response 2
Overview: Expanded ski storage.
Response 3
Overview: Employee housing
Scope/Size: Amount: determine the number of employees working in Lionshead (including all VA operations
based out of Lionshead) and provide housing for 75% of those individuals.
Financing by: Capital generated through tax credits. Must have an economy of scale to do tax credits. If land is
provided, developers can do the deal.
Objective
advanced: Lionshead will be more vibrant (#1) and its vitality will increase (#2) with greater ownership by
residents, more locals using restaurants and bars in the area and a less cyclical use of the area.
Primary/secondary
uses: Different types of housing. Base it on market research done by VA on other recent projects.
Square footage
required: Base it on demand as determined by the existing number of employees in Lionshead.
Architectural/Site
studies: Consider: town shops, Public Service site, VA shops, north day lot, west day lot, roof of parking
structure, south side of parking structure.
1
,
Response 4
Overview: Better access to Lionshead from the Village down Meadow Drive. Building a landscaped pedestrian
walkway from Crossroads past Dobson to Lionshead.
Scope/Size: An 8-10 foot separated walkway with lighting, trees and possibly rest benches.
Financing by: Public.
Objective
advanced: Aesthetics with a cohesive tying in of Lionshead to Vail Village.
Primary/secondary
uses: Is there any other access to Vail Valley Medical Center other than down Meadow Drive? In order to
decrease traffic and make walking to Lionshead easier, particularly in the winter when the bike path is
inaccessible.
Special infrastructure
requirements: Maybe lighting and sprinkler system for trees and landscaping.
Access
requirements: No extra parking.
Response 5
Overview: More rg een space incorporating gardens and a children's park with more pedestrian-friendly access.
Scope/Size: Maybe a children's park near creek between gondola and Lions Square Lodge. A play area the size of
the "pirate ship" (near the Vista Bahn) and surrounding open grass for eating or hearing music, etc.
Financing by.• Preferably public/private combination of funds.
Objective
advanced: A sense of gathering space which is not concrete (like the area near Banner Sports). Improved
aesthetics.
Primary/secondary
uses: Possibly a small bandstand for concerts. Some incorporation of a mini-golf area (which used to be near the
old gondola).
Square footage
required: Something approaching the size of the park and open space currently next to the Betty Ford Alpine Garden.
Special infrastructure
requirements: Water fountains. Outdoor lights for night use.
Access
requirements: No more parking needed. Hopefully access would be pedestrian along the bike path or from the current
parking structure.
Response 6
Overview: Allow use of "carts" similar to the Popcorn Wagon to sell everything from sweaters, gifts, cookies, coffee,
etc.
Scope/Size: Location: all through Lionshead Mall.
Financing by: Carts would be individually owned with preference given to existing businesses.
2
,
Objective
advanced.• Enhance the mall area - more interesting to walk through.
Primary/secondary
uses: Retail.
Sguare footage
required: ltoughly same size as Popcorn Wagon - maybe smaller.
Special infrastructure
requirements: Carts would need to be moveable, i.e. wheels to allow for emergency vehicles to get past - or only would
be allowed in more spacious areas. However, best impact would be at intervals all up and down the mall.
References: Just about every mall has these carts. They must be successful - would add to our sales tax revenues.
Response 7
Overview: A"children's fountain" or similar idea - wading area, etc. for the west end of the Lionshead area in front of
the Montaneros building. Make it easy for kids to get in and out of, with areas for parents to sit and relax.
Scope/Size: The fountain would need to fit in the area that is curved and surrounded by a stone wall with the flag poles.
It would need to be inviting to people to cool their feet or for kids to splash in on hot summer days.
Financing by: Perhaps a private/public partnership - if not, then public funds.
Objective
advanced: Objective #1. Water signifies life, movement, activity. Where there is water, things are flourishing.
This would draw people to the west end of the mall area from the center of the mall. The water that is
near the Chart House steps is too far out of the way to even be noticed and it is not easy for anyone to
play in. Make it inviting, colorful with landscaping or colorful sculptures, and active.
Primary/secondary
uses: Primary: summer months - fountain. Secondary: winter months - fire pit for storytellers, or just a
place to warm fingers and toes.
Square footage
required: Whatever the square footage is in that semicircular area in front of Montaneros.
Specialinfrastructure
requirements: Just the water.
Access
requirements: No special access requirements. The area is already set aside for something - although it's uncertain
what it is set aside for.
References: The intent would be similar to the use for the Children's Fountain in Vail Village or the water area
near the Covered Bridge.
Response 8
Overview: Replace the existing Sunbird Lodge and gondola buildings with a five star hotel, ski-in/ski-out access.
Scope/Size: Possibly a 3 to 5 story structure on the scale of the Sonnenalp Bavaria Haus.
Financing by: The hotel and possibly VA.
3
Objective
advanced: Improvement of the Lionshead core with an excellent hotel as an anchor. Move live beds. Improved
infrastructure, better amenities. Actually could meet a lot of the policy objectives.
Primary/secondary
uses: Hotel rooms and restaurants. Lift ticket facilities, possibly ski school facilities, retail shops,
conference facilities.
Specialinfrastructure
requirements: State of the art communications facilities.
Access
requirements: Passenger drop-off and underground parking would be needed, as well as a service delivery area
(underground). Pedestrian traffic would need to be able to go around or through it for lift access.
Passenger drop-off / main entrance from Lionshead Place as well as the parking entrance.
References: The Ritz Carlton in Aspen is a good example.
r.-~
~
r- ~
GOMOOLFRM1XItlq BUX LODGE
~rL1oSe~'y~ ~
Response 9
Overview: Create wel] defined and related public spaces. This could be achieved by strengthening the arrival
sequence to the village and creating a stronger destination point at the slope base, i.e. "beach front"
strengthening the anchors at each end of the pedestrian sequence will be a catalyst to making the
village a more dynamic place.
Scope/Size: This would probably be done through a combination of landscaping, new buildings and rerouting the
circulation. As long as sun pockets are preserved, the village can be denser. Additional building or
additions could help define the currently fragmented public spaces. Some of the spaces are currently
too large and barren.
Financing by: Public-private partnership, most likely.
Objective
advanced.- Create a better sense of arrival and create a better destination place at the ski slopes which could
achieve a clear, dynamic public environment similar to Vail Village.
Primary/secondary
uses: Could include redevelopment of existing structures or new structures - the specifics can be flexible -
the goal of improving the anchors can be achieved by many means. If the anchors of the village are
improved, the rest of the village will, in turn, be vitalized by more visitors, better retail sales, higher
occupancy rates which can sponsor/spur re-landscaping and redevelopment.
4
Access
requirements: The main bus drop-off should be relocated to an improved entry space at the parking garage.
Architectural/Site
studies: Following is a very schematic diagram of how the anchors of the village might be developed.
E) ( GS TI~~ 40 IV011T~~___
~
"~EAK ~~~ORS
'.}01
~
i I
e ~
~ ' ~,r^
• . :3 jtl~;~yy~~
~ r. . . ,
~ „~+i . . .n........ . . .
, . , . _
h . w . .r... .~,•S-
.
a
. . ~,s
h-mamRS.~w oaa.
. , e. . L) Oi ~~~Yft FOs` .
~~~SM/ oAYSVWX
CRt+~~~ PRONT ,
~ u
S0GUTVN
STUN6,149N ANZyOKS
- • , " J.
~
Y r
y
_ , ; ` ._.J';
t 's.
' i,.~, • A,,.,'. .
. . ~
`
E . ~ ,*r
i~ ~
asT. . . .
..~~6H°YT9 *.71 Ptk/~ P$ l~ ~~C~Se 1 f
~!!A Wf, ARRI'4'AL VA"
Response 10
Overview: No net loss of employee housing. Hopefully a net gain. Rebuild the VA service yard to put 3 to 4
stories of employee housing over the shops. Move the snow cats to an on-mountain facility.
,Scope/Size: The service yard could offer at least three times the amount of employee housing than the Sunbird
now offers. Utilize the parking to the west of the yard.
5
Financing by: VA, possibly some public funds could be found.
Objective
advanced: A net gain in employee housing.
Primary/secondary
uses: Underground parking could be a part of the project, both for residents and service yard employees.
Service yard, employee housing like the current Sunbird Lodge.
Special infrastructure
requirements: Underground parking.
Access
requirements: A bus stop moved in front of it. Better pedestrian access to Lionshead.
Response 11
Overview: Children's playground.
Scope/Size: Similar to that in Ford Park.
Financing by: Public.
Objective
advanced: Gets people and families out. Improves uses of open spaces. Adds activity during the summer.
Access
requirements: Should be accessible by walking from any point in Lionshead.
Res onse 12
Overview: High-tech conference center.
Scope/Size: Potential locations: [Note: To be successful, MUST be located adjacent to hotel] Parking structure,
east of parking structure (closer to hospital), north day lot, west day lot (adjacent to Marriott). Size:
25-75 person groups.
Financing by: Private - hotel or corporate sponsor.
Objective
advanced: Vita(ity and amenities: would be a new amenity. Stronger economic base through increased "live
beds" would support (financing-wise) the development of a new hotel; would increase hotel use
during weekdays, one of our non-peak periods, would have positive spin-off effects on other lodging
properties in terms of nightly rate increases; would positively impact restaurants and retail in
Lionshead.
Primary/secondary
uses: See notes, following.
References: See notes, following.
6
.
Response 13
Overview: A classical lion, with an aspen wreath crown, standing on mountain peaks be used as the unifying and
identifying theme and an integral part of the Lionshead reformation and master plan. The Lion should
be all encompassing to deliver maacimum charm and memorability.
Scope/Size: a. Courtyard area in central Lionshead. An amorphous area that needs a focal point desperately. A
bronze lion stature approximately 15 feet high placed to stand facing the mountain. A good point of
reference and photograph taking, etc. 200 or more fiberglass copies of the statue (a Iittle iarger than
life size) and offered to famous artists and otherwise to decorate for good international publicity. The
finished lions would then be displayed along the streets of Lionshead. After a prescribed length of
time (2-3 months) each lion would be auctioned off to the highest bidder. Zurich, Switzerland did this
to celebrate their anniversary and they had an enormous success. Their lions were literally works of
art and very valuable. After this show, seated lions, weatherproof and to be used as benches should be
placed every 10 to 15 feet apart and placed at strategic points throughout the village.
b. In the area of the courtyard adjacent to the Chart House where the siope necessitates steps down to
the courtyard, tucked into the step area (see sketch), a miniature mountain of stone but with many
nooks and crannies can shelter rock-plants dripping water and fountain, pool and lion.
c. The existing large clock, which serves a very good purpose, should be embellished with lions.
d. The center of the traffic circle by the Beaver Creek bus stop can be enhanced by a large pseudo
topiary lion covered by twinkle lights. (Disney has Mickey Mouse and whale topiary bushes used to
good effect.)
e. The ice rink and library do not feel as though they are part of Lionshead. The long garage wall
facing a variety of residential use buildings only add to this sense of disconnection. The answer is to
make this area of the road exciting, different and interesting. The garage wall could be enhanced with
a scene of mountain peaks and the Lionshead lion, in lights that twinkle or neon and constantly in
motion. On the opposite side of the road to balance this effect a row of lions every 15' . These lions to
be glowing from inside or topiary with twinkle lights. Thus making a lion alley which would feel a
much friendlier place.
f. The main Lionshead bus stop area, and all the other major entry points into the Village should have
Entry Archways or columns incorporating lions, to give one a sense of arrival and destination.
g. Street furniture, garbage cans, lamp posts, etc. can all incorporate lion paws etc. Sign posting also.
h. Sidewalks, courtyards etc. can incorporate paw prints into their surface and can aid the summer
visitor to find his way between important points in town. In Winter colored paw prints can be placed
on the snow as a directional aid and for fun, maybe on the last ski sketch home over the bridge etc.
etc.
i. A person dressed as a large Sir Lionshead lion (Mickey Mouse style) on skis in winter, walking
around the town in Summer for tourist information and for fun.
j. A very important aspect of this plan would be wall murals. Every blank wall or unsightly facade /
building / some Vail buses / the ski-in bridge over Gore Creek can become literally works of art and
deception, turning the most ugly into the most glorious. A bland town in Canada did this and became
a tourist Mecca. (See attached article showing possibilities and describing the process.)
7
Financing by: Financial thoughts. (a) A Lionshead Lottery. (b) The copyrighted Lionshead lion, the adult design
and the children's design could generate some moneys. (c) The sale of the artist decorated lions
would generate some funds. (d) Murals which would be a large part of the plan could be financed by
the building owner's, who would be given tax breaks and other benefits (maybe reduced price ski lift
tickets for their renters), free publicity etc. etc. (e) Architecture / Engineering schools are delighted to
be given design projects for their students, they will work for free on design and construction also. In
return for on site work they could be housed and fed free of charge by local businesses.
Objective
advanced: Objective 1: Lionshead would benefit by being: Warmer, vibrant, appealing, a memorable
experience in its own right. A sense of place and identity. By gaining a new strong prideful
personality. Unified by a theme for both old construction and a base for future construction design. [n
summary, Lionshead would be like no other place in the world, and a lot of fun, people can feel a
tremendous fondness for such a symbol, e.g. the statue of the elk that used to be outside the Two Elk
Restaurant, and this is the type of place you will revisit.
Objective 2: Lionshead streetscape would be fun. The lions at the base of Nelson's column are in
constant use they are being patted, sat on, photographed and enjoyed.
Objective 3: People will revisit a memorable unique and special place.
Objective 4: Improved signage and the paw prints will aid the flow of the pedestrian traffic.
Objective 6: See notes on financial thoughts, above.
Primary/secondary
uses: Statuary and murals are not enough to ensure a successful Lionshead. The main courtyard that
extends from the Chart House to the stores just past the Popcorn Wagon should be considered the
heart of Lionshead. The fountain, rock garden lion pool and the giant lion statue add necessary focal
points and to a degree they create an activity. To become the hub of the village additional activities
must be added. First the disjointed streets and variety of different levels must be sculpted as much as
possible into a single level all leading into this hub. Next, a multi purpose town hall could be created,
with commercial kitchen and stage with the body of the hall no more than 100' x 60'. Access to the
hall from the courtyard must be easy and available and visually obvious, with many large doorways.
Pedestrian traffic must have no impediments flowing in and out. Town Meetings, craft shows,
weddings, comedy and local theater and small conventions etc. etc., all would have a place. The
narrow side of the hall must be the one facing the courtyard, a too large building will defeat the aim to
have a vibrant human scale town center. It may be possible to incorporate this hall into the old
Gondola building? at the same time making it more functional for existing tenants, and looking much
more inviting. Trails End could be housed and be made more accessible to the village with a greater
deck area wrapping around.
1 propose an open air theater, within sight of the courtyard, and on the edge of the mountain. Along
the same lines as Wolf Trap in the metropolitan area of Washington D.C., the theater would be roofed
and open-sided with a grassy slope area for those wishing to view the performance under the stars,
and the under roof seating for the others. With picnic tables nearby, this makes for a wonderful
activity. Wolf Trap is operated under the auspices of the National Park Service with great success.
Winter Performances would be held in the town hall, so it must be designed very carefully to
accommodate the acoustic needs of both spoken word and music.
In summary, the combination of theme, hub, heart and activity for both winter and summer are a
combination that guarantee a healthy, long-ter?n success to take Lionshead into the new millennium.
8
References: See attached.
~
~
~
. ~ ~ : . .
~
~
R
r~ ~ .yr ° ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ r
Wt;_
~ ~•~~r~ ~
$~q,~_'
t ^ ti 6 • a"
e
~
Response 14
Overview: A grocery store or at least a convenience store. A pharmacy, also.
Scope/Size: Within a 5 to 10 minute walk from anywhere in Lionsliead.
Financing by: Private.
9
Objective
advanced: Enhancement of Lionshead services and amenities. Most guests come without a car, so grocery
shopping becomes a big problem. Also there is nowhere dvithin Lionshead where once can quickly
run out for milk or other necessities.
Response 15
Overview: To have the walk along Gore Creek extend all the way from Lionshead to the Village so that people
don't have to walk on the street and battle the buses, etc.
Response 16
Overview: Community center with athletic, gymnastic, cultural, educational, meeting space and conference (local
and external) space. Possible child care center (locals and guests). Should be inter-generational.
Scope/Size: Located where $28 million performing arts center proposed - east end of parking structure. Possibly
include redevelopment of Dobson area to accommodate more events / activities.
Financing by: Public-private / consider an "assessment" of TOV property owners over a five year period.
Objective
advanced: Vitality and amenities for resort visitors and valley residents.
Primary/secondary
uses: An ice surface would free up Dobson for conference / meeting space as well as providing additional
ice activities. Would be used by theater / dance groups; arts council; symposium; "under 18"
activities; non-profit organization meeting place; educational seminars / film festivals; photography
workshops; athletic / workout facilities.
Specialinjrastructure
requirements: Anything new should be "state of the art"!
Response 17
Overview: Something that brings life to the area - conference, hotel with full conference amenities or IMAX /
theater (like the Buell in Denver) or combined age group amenity that caters to all ages, i.e. 16-20
year olds. Encourage eye level architecture to improve the appearance of the mall.
Scope/Size: Not too big as Beaver Creek now has a performing arts center.
Financing by: Private.
Res onse 18
Overview: There are five topics which I would like see addressed in the master plan. These are:
Public park and playground site; Gore Creek stream access points and trail; landscape quality;
pedestrian friendly improvements; and visual access to the mountain.
With the removal of the defunct Lionshead Totlot last year, the Lionshead area is without a public
park and playground site.
Scope/Size: The redevelopment master plan should identify a site about 1/2 acre in size for a public park. The site
should be adjacent to the commercial / ski base area and connected to the existing recreation path
system. Park elements should include an open turf grass play area, picnic facilities, restrooms, and a
large playground. The playground should have separate areas designed for 2- 5 year olds and 5- 12
year olds and should comply with the CPSC and ASTM playground safety standards. 1 would like to
10
try some commercial play equipment and get away from the in-house structures that we have been
using. Shade, seating, signs, and ADA access all need to be considered in the design.
The area north of Gore Creek and east of the skier bridge is ideal for expanded stream access. I would
like to see a nature trail and stream access points constructed between the existing bridge and the
north side of the Library. A bridge and some stream bank improvements would be needed at the
Library end. From the main trail route, two or three spur trails terminating at observation points along
Gore Creek, would provide stream access consistent with the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
Nature interpretation elements (similar to VA's skicology program) could easily be incorporated into
the trail design. Boardwalks, fencing, signs, and native plantings would keep users on the trails and
allow the existing social trails to be re-vegetated and restored. Restoration of other areas may give the
Town or VA some valuable wetland credits.
The quality of the landscape plantings are very poor. The perennials have not done well and most of
the woody plants, being over-planted at the start, are crowding each other and the buildings. The hard
edges formed by the raised walls and concrete caps are difficult to work with. I would like to see
much softer lines and more ground level beds that contrast, rather than parallel, the building forms.
Seasonal flower displays should be included wherever possible.
One of the biggest problems with Lionshead Mall is the pedestrian connection with the Lionshead
Parking Structure. The current arrangement of crosswalks, bus lanes and roadway puts the pedestrian
in direct conflict with autos and busses. The loading zone and lack of a drop-off area compound the
problem. The redevelopment master plan design should separate vehictes and pedestrians either
spatially or by grade. Spatial separation is probably the most likely solution to succeed. I would like to
offer a concept for consideration by the design team. This concept involves six components:
Reroute East Lionshead Circle to South Frontage Road by the International; East Lionshead Circle
becomes local traffic only and does not cross southwest corner of the structure (emergency vehicles
excepted); extend pedestrian zone from LIONSHEAD Mall to the southwest portal of the Lionshead
structure; in-town bus route, from the east, turns around before pedestrian connection; designate a
drop-off area within the Lionshead structure (possibly connected with the new East Lionshead Circle);
and all loading and delivery in LIONSHEAD mall occurs from the west end of the mall.
The attached sketch should help illustrate the concept.
Finally, the Lionshead arcade would benefit greatly from a better visual connection to the mountain.
Currently, only the corridor from Bart and Yetis past the Gondola has a view of the mountain (as weil
as good sun). With two major buildings potentially coming down, there is an opportunity to create
additional visual corridors from the park/fountain area and from the west end of the mall. The
corridors need to be wide and unobstructed rather than the "windows" through the building previously
considered. I am sure that VA will not be willing to do this on their own. The financial aspects of the
redevelopment will require maximization of ground area. The Town and the public will have to push
the idea hard to make it happen.
11
3~La ~n ~ • ~
r~t
~ . AV
. ~
Response 19
Overview: Transit loop east-west through Lionshead from west day lot to Library (or to Village) (light rail,
trolley, electric bus (European)),
B~~
~ 'I R
.
;
e
el.~'''w'' t
- . ^ ~ .
17, .
.
' ' • / ~s44N1
f6/~ .
r~
y . 'y1 , bfW1 .
,
~h.Y, ' . . . . • a' ~ 9
.
oMAv my # J
1@ihy
t
{ 'r 4
' 1 ' , ' ~ ~ ~~'A,• .a^rO+"' J
Response 20
Overview: Redevelopment policy allowing density and in-fill with requirement for meeting redevelopment plan
objectives, providing on-site to off-site pedestrian improvements, improved public spaces, providing
live beds, employee housing (rental or ownership), providing first floor retail, increase in office
spaces, etc. May require meeting 3 out of 4 to be provided or require some and allow choices in other
areas.
Response 21
Overview: Create a larger space in front of the old gondola building to provide many, hundreds, of beach type
chairs with outdoor drink service and patio restaurant area.
12
Response 22
Overview: Eliminate existing light fixtures in Lionshead and provide new fixtures in logical locations - new style
- Village fixture?
Response 23
Overview: Identify Lionshead area by providing low level walls and entry statements along Frontage Road /
Meadow Drive - rock walls so you can point to an area and say, "that's Lionshead." L
.
~
~Plp~af~ P ~ r .
~ .aw.t' . Tvt
[
_°ti~"~ . ' ~ p ~i ~ ! ~ . ~F
~
,
:Mtaa. , .w.... mrr~. # mMry
.
.
~
Response 24
Overview: West day lot is very visible sight as those traveling from west head directly into this site. Provide
recommendations for this site that requires it to anchor the west end of Lionshead (physically and
economically) and is of substantial architectural value, has no visible parking and contains active first
floor uses.
Res onse 25
Overview: Consider second and third story pedestrian connections between buildings (sky-walk). Could be
unique for Lionshead.
Response 26
Overview: Provide a small amphitheater in the main plaza area that will encourage people to hang out, music
events to occur or a sunken plaza with steps for sitting.
Response 27
Overview: Provide a fountain or other water feature in plaza areas.
Res onse 28
Overview: Allow merchants, restaurants to use portion of public space for seating/service without gates or
fences. Allow more vendor carts. Maybe allow more in summer and less in winter.
Response 29
Overview: Allow the main mall area of Lionshead (to be delineated) to be an open alcohol consumption area
during certain hours of the day/night (maybe Fridays and Saturdays only) (to be purchased from on-
site vendors in a Lionshead cup). This will increase life and vitality of plaza and allow some freedom
to move about, shop, visit, talk.
Response 30
Overview: Allow weekly, very small outdoor concerts in plaza.
13
Response3l
Overview: Create a bicycle route through the heart of Lionshead, not just around the perimeter.
, •
,.••`r ~ '
'k,,..
T~ ..a '
s. ma.%
- ~ ~ ~ 1•-'~.+
.
..a,....
+.g.qeravw ~ ,,j " _ • .
~
Response 32
Overview: Require private properiy connections to bike and pedestrian ways.
,e~} r~t • ~ ~r:'
~ ` , ..sy~
~
1 ~
.~.Lf
. . R~a
Resnonse 33
Overview: Soften / improve architecture of parking structure by introducing new materials, stone, wood,
landscaping, etc. Require all structures to be architectural(y significant and compatible with an area
theme and other structures.
Response34
Overview: Require greater articulation of base ski lift facilities. Reyuire facilities to meet theme and be
compatible with surrounding architecture. Require stone, wood, shake roofs. Do not allow metal
roofs.
14
Response 35
Overview: Create a centralized loading and delivery zone under ground in the heart of Lionshead. This could be
provided beneath the Sunbird / Gondola building and service the entire area.
]a~r
.r- -
~ s ~ ~ , ~
-5
it L,.••.• ~
~
. .
~
. ~ . . - , •
~
•rl1ulr . yI' n...':.. ; . .r
~ , . . , !a
Response 36
Overview: Require that private developments purchase land from the Town for any encroachments at fair market
value. Use this money for public projects in Lionshead.
Response 37
Overview: Provide locations for newspaper boxes and trash cans with consistent design.
Response 38
Overview: Develop a centralized community compactor / dumpsite (similaz to Breckenridge) for core area.
Response 39
Overview: Snow removal - this not only includes streets and pedestrian areas but also roof drainage. As a
solution as much of the mall as possible should be snow melted and there should be proper drainage.
Response 40
Overview: Emergency and maintenance vehicle access - make allowances for this.
Response 41
Overview: Lighting - replace existing lighting - it's ugly as Lionshead. There is also a need to predetermine
which areas are to be holiday lighted and plan them.
Response 42
Overview: Rock wall, bench, trash receptacle and paver replacement. They are deteriorating and need some
redesigning.
Response43
Overview: The stairway from the north day lot and the lot itself could be better utilized.
Response44
Overview: Vail Associate's maintenance facility and their use of west Forest Road dominates that side of
Lionshead and adds to Lionshead' unattractiveness.
Res onse 45
Over•view: Currently Lionshead is too "industrial" looking. There is too much concrete showing, the buildings
are boxy and generally just ugly. The Town's auxiliary building on the southwest end of the parking
15
structure is a good example of this. Anything that can be done to improve the building's facades and
roof lines would be a major improvement.
Response 46
Overview: The skier bridge looks like a livestock ramp and needs work to make it look better.
Response 47
Overview: The fountain is rather plain ar?d can be enhanced.
Response 48
Overview: The landscaping in the mall seems to be in small islands and is not very natural looking.
Response 49
Overview: With Gore Creek running along the whole length of Lionshead, there is a great opportunity for river
access activities, including a park, playground, and areas for outdoor entertainment.
Response 50
Overview: Making the mall more inviting with better entries, seating and gathering areas would help.
Response 51
Overview: Redoing the bus shelter to include heat would add the possibility of providing information there. This
would allow for the removal of the small information bunker at the east end, which is another eyesore.
Response 52
Overview: Deliveries are a problem and need to be done from one or tow specified locations.
Resoonse 53
Overview: Skier drop off and how to get vehicles in and out quickly needs to be addressed.
Response 54
Overview: Pedestrian access from the parking structure needs to be separated from vehicle contact.
Response 55
Overview: Town Bus routing and stops need to be designed so there is less conflict with pedestrians and other
vehicles. Maybe its time to revive the monorail idea.
Resnonse 56
Overview: Covering the parking structure would make it easier to maintain (snow removal) and much more
pleasing aesthetically. There is also the opportunity for development there. Perhaps a convention
center (there is still that need) or maybe even a park on top.
Response 57
Overview: Install a roof on the Lionshead structure. Add commercial / office area on top of the structure.
Response 58
Overview: Lionshead Transportation Center. Terminate the in-town bus shuttle at this location, install
centralized parking pay point, information services, and ski ticket sales.
Response 59
Overview: Eliminate Concert Hall Plaza stop. Through design, encourage pedestrian traffic from old Concert
Hall area to Lionshead parking structure.
16
Response 60
Overview: Tear down Ice Arena and build convention center in its place.
Response 61
Overview: Develop the area by Lion Square Lodge as a pedestrian / skier drop off for out of town buses and cars.
Response 62
Overview: Add parking to Lionshead structure.
Resnonse 63
Overview: Skier bridge to area east of Forest Road bridge.
Response 64
Overview: Extend town shuttle to stop at gondola and proceed east to Vail Village via tunnel.
Response 65
Overview: Heat all pedestrian walk ways.
Response 66
Overview: More employee housing units in larger Lionshead area, keep those that exist (Sunbird) so that there is
actually a net gain in the number of employee housing units. Do this by utilizing public works / Town
of Vail and Vail Associates property and approaching these plots also as part of Lionshead planning.
Scope/Size: "Larger Lionshead" planning should include all area mentioned above for most cohesive plan.
Financing by: Appropriate for partnership financing - Town of Vail could offer density waivers, should demand Vail
Associates compensate for employee additions necessary for Adventure Ridge, Game Creek Club,
and Category III. Some developers still willing to work with Town of Vail to include employee
housing units in larger units as hotels if some waiver of fees, GFRA, etc.
Objective
advanced: Lionshead now looks like a set for "Clockwork Orange" when not in high season. No people = fear,
loathsome. More year round and seasonal including summer employees = a warmer, more vibrant
environment. More "deed restricted" units. Creative financing. Stronger economic base through
more sales tax from locals living there.
Primary/secondary
uses: 1. A few deed restricted units for year round employees working in Vail. 2. 200+ employee housing
units for seasonal employees working in Vail and especially for Vail Associates. More locals equals
a. more vibrant, vital Lionshead year round and b. more sales for Lionshead shops, eateries year
round.
Square footage
required: 1. No net loss of employee housing units in Lionshead larger area and 2. accomplish actual
ain.
Feasibility
studies: Research by/for: 1990 housing study, Eagle County Housing Task Force draft policy; RRC? Golden
Consultants' study and estimate that only 38% of employees working in Vail live in Vail.
Response 67
Scope/Size: A. Sundance - location - keep maximum height of new building same as old building!
B. Maintain north day parking lot access to Landmark as is!
17
Resnonse 68
Overview: Our main concern would be the height of any proposed buildings erected southwest to southeast
which would obstruct the Landmark view. Buildings should be held to four stories in height or not
any higher than existing buildings which would be raised or modified.
Financing by.• Public-private partnership financing.
Response 69
Overview: Policy - any tear down must be recycled. Concern - this is the fourth or fifth time Lionshead has been
planned. Can a difference be made?
Scope/Size: Concern - incentives are short-lived - pride is long term. Incentives are at public expense for private
profit.
Financing by: If the Town keeps public areas nice, embarrassment will force private sector to improve.
Resnonse 70
Overview: Create a new entry into Lionshead from the parking structure. This idea includes:
- remove loading area
- relocate bus stops, remove bus shelter and replace with a smaller shelter closer to the bus stop
- create a new plaza in the space. Space should include a landscape buffer, a water feature or art
piece (maybe a giant lion's head!), a defined walkway that utilizes the natural path that pedestrians
currently use (down the bus lane).
- narrow the road (East Lionshead Circle) where pedestrians cross.
p m,v
8~'YdMy'{i ~ ~ ~ ww.„Mq~y.y • ~ ayz, ~ • e . ar M Te Y,~~
$~6~p 4~'~~ •J ~ .
d ~
. d+t9+s9ort, ~
'p • o .w,~~ `+.r.-~r
II ~ ~
Q~'= ?~orar~
~ i4~Krnvqti~ :
.,~"'a,..... .I?177Yr -`~0ktk~rRA:
uroi .
d-~ . or,tiyv~' ~ 7~;
4'r~F~ " r .
~y°Kaa;uaU d
_...W'
o....en~o. . _ .
~ ~ ~'"'r • •
~:r..
%o
i;'~'"p ' ~ ~.~g~~ •r,~ r
. . . P`,~'°
18
Resaonse 71
Overview: Policy issue: allow and encourage redevelopment that may cross existing lot lines. In an effort to
improve circulation through Lionshead, some buildings may be better situated in a slightly different
location. Allow buildings to cross property lines, buy or exchange Town right-of-ways to help
improve circulation. Along with this, eliminate the 10' setback requirements. Use zero setbacks, as
in CCI. Increase site coverage requirements to 80%.
Resaonse 72
Overview: Lionshead needs a sense of arrival/place.
Scope/Size: Redesign entry closest to the parking structure, such that this becomes a central plaza area with a
plaza-type atmosphere. Possibly locate some public art to effectively identify this area as the entrance
to Lionshead. It needs something similar to the covered bridge that furthers the chosen design
scheme.
Response 73
Overview: Lionshead should adopt a Comprehensive Sign Program. This would serve to further build upon the
design theme in Lionshead as well as serve a more functional purpose of directing pedestrian flow
more efficiently and effectively.
Response 74
Overview: There should be more types of activities that lessen the impact of skiing. Currently, if a person gets
off the bus near the parking structure, they follow the path of all skiers, ending up at the ticket office,
ski school, rental, etc. Provide more gathering places that direct people to the periphery..
Scope/Size: Add meeting places, pocket parks, outdoor concert areas, etc.
Response 75
Overview: Concerning a possible performing Arts Center / Convention Center, I do not believe that a major
convention center makes sense for Vail given that we do not have significant hotels who need the
facility. The existing large hotels have their own convention space and would only put people in
another convention center when they could not accommodate them within their own hotels.
Additionally, we just do not have enough small hotels to fill up a convention center. Finally, with the
uneven nature of our condominium base we just do not appeal to convention planners.
I also do not believe a large facility in the 2500-3500 seat operation is the right scale for the Town.
Especially important, the cost of operating it and the difficulty of getting the right type of events to
mesh with our community is just very difficult with that many seats. Accordingly I do not believe that
I would be supportive of a major entertainment center.
I do believe however, that it would be very much in the best interest of the Town to develop a 750 -
1250 seat community hall located either adjacent to Dobson Arena (or in Dobson itself). This facility
would be multi-purpose in its use. It would be able to accommodate dance, music, theater,
symposiums, education, lectures, high school graduations, etc. I would additionally see minimum
food service with the facility, just enough to handle break outs, but not major meals. Finally, I would
suggest that 4- 6 additional rooms built around the main hall would be extremely helpful. These
would be anywhere from 50 - 125 seats. Also, I forgot to mention that the major facility should be
able to be segregated out into different segments depending on the size of the audience.
I believe that a facility as described would do much to revitalize and energize Vail, helping it to
compete as we move into the future. I am also convinced that this type of professional facility would
generate new businesses, ideas and programs that have not yet been thought of for Vail.
19
Resnonse 76
Overview: Community center - meetings, gymnastics, open gym, performance area for local groups and/or a
place where you don't have to drink to hear music, craft area, youth center, coffee house, kitchen
facility.
Scope/Size: 200-250 seat performance area - full gym dividable - gymnastics area because there are 300 on a
waiting list at present facility.
Financing by.• Public-private consortium - additional tax or one time assessment.
Objective
advanced: Amenities for locals and tourists.
Primary/secondary
uses: Youth socials, speakers, local groups which need a place to hold meetings (outside of hotels). A place
for youth, teen, seniors, dance troupes, small concerts, pot luck parties, special craft lessons, local
artist displays.
Access
requirements: Lionshead parking structure should serve. Should be near pobson, the library - civic area.
Response 77
Overview: Expand the pedestrian/commercial core. Increase retail, food and beverage establishments.
Scope/Size: First, pedestrianize Lionshead Place (or at least a portion of it) and create a retail loop, connecting the
west side of Concert Hall Plaza with the south and west sides of the Sunbird/Gondola buildings.
Provide incentives for first-floor commercial additions/expansions to the Marriott, Antlers, Lion
Square Lodge (north and south) and Montaneros. This alone could potentially double the shopping
district.
Second, provide additional retail opportunities at the south and southwest portions of the parking
structure.
How: a. Eliminate the parking pay-in-lieu fee for very specific targeted uses. This is key.
b. Modify some of the existing development standards; again, only for specific targeted uses. Such as
eliminate setbacks for CCII (currently 10') or increase site coverage.
Incentives: a. public transit at Lionshead Place would need to be redirected to an alternate location.
Logical place would be to create a transit area at the parking structure.
b. provide underground access to the parking structures of the Antlers and Lion Square Lodge to
eliminate vehicular traffic yet maintain access to those sites.
20
r. ~
_ . •
? ~x /p` 'F iI FPNi q, .
~r~- .u~.. w.;~~ •,~4
- • _
.
-
01
. p, .
.~"~'a . _ ! . . - . •
~~.r.
t ~s : r .,.x A. ~r., .
.mai~.r... ' n~~~ ~
..x: _
Response 78
Overview: Provide a direct vehicular connection from Vail International to the South Frontage Road.
Scope/Size: Consider a connection with the Evergreen. This would reduce traffic and improve safety on East
Lionshead Circle. Implement the Streetscape Master Plan in the area.
Response 79
Overview: Re-route the South Frontage Road north of the VA shops parcel.
Scope/Size: Utilize the I-70 right of way for the re-routed road. Comprehensively master plan the VA shops
parcel, the west day lot, the old town shops, the gas station and the Holy Cross parcel. Not sure what
to do with the Water District site? Consider seasonal employee housing, public parking, regional
transit, etc. Relocate the VA facility (at a smaller scale) to the old town shops. Provide a new bridge
for snow cat access to the mountain and direct the cats west. Avoid the residential areas of West
Forest Road.
Response 80
Overview: Adopt design guidelines for energy conservation.
Scope/Size: A) Use compact florescent lighting and solid state electronic ballasts
B) Insulation minimum of R-19 to R-30 for ceilings and walls
C) Use day lighting techniques such as skylights to provide passive solar heat
D) Optimize passive solar heating by orienting buildings to take advantage of southern exposures
E) Use solar panels or recover heat from building heating systems to provide heat for any exterior
heating pavers. This is being effectively done in Aspen and can have a return on investment in 1.5
year
F) Use solar technology to augment heating and lighting. May want to consider for one specific
building as a demonstration. Building designs should allow easy installation of photovoltaic panels if
property owners choose to use this technology
G) Plant trees on east and west sides of building to reduce heating needs
H) Use state of the art heating and cooling systems
21
Financing by: Energy conservation can increase up front costs but will result in net savings over a 2-5 year time
frame. For example, Breckenridge Hilton saves $22,607 a year after simply changing over to
florescent bulbs.
Response 81
Overview: Adopt principals for waste management
Scope/Size: A) The Eagle County Landfills life span has declined from 20 years in 1990 to only 8 years in 1996.
The major reason why the landfill capacity is lower than expected is because of demolition activity.
Landfilling materials from demo/rebuilds in Lionshead should be the last option after looking at how
to reuse materials for construction, reprocess materials for other uses, and/or shredding and
compacting material to reduce the volume of landfilled materials. Developers should be required to
first obtain the services of a demolition contractor that will reuse the materials from the site. The
Eagle County Solid Waste Supervisor has obtained the names of several contractors that will often
charge an equivalent per ton charge to reuse the material as it would cost to dispose of the material at
the landfill.
B) Identify opportunities to utilize secondary materials for construction. For example recycled plastic
can be fabricated to look like wood. Keystone Resorts has used this product extensively for building
construction, benches, and garbage cans. Reused aggregate can also be used for building foundations.
Carpeting can also be made out of recycled products.
C) Provide room for recycling collection points for each Building and then a convenient location in
Lionshead for a central pick-up area.
D) For guest accommodation, give guests the option to use green bags to recycle materials if they
choose. This is also done in Keystone and leaves a very favorable impression on guests, even in their
nicest hotels.
E) Provide a restaurant collection point for food waste which could be integrated with the Water and
Sanitation Districts composting system.
F) Provide adequate space for dish washing facilities to reduce dependency on disposable products.
G) Provide outdoor recycling receptacles.
H) Use Water and Sanitation District compost for landscaping soil amendment.
Financing by: Waste collection services charge based on the amount of waste generated(i.e. how many times a week
collection occurs. Savings can be realized by significantly reducing waste production. In addition the
public cost will be extremely high if the landfill is prematurely filled.
Response 82
Overview: Water Conservation
Scope/Size: A) Use drought resistant plants for landscaping. I would suggest that the Town or VA maintain a
xeriscape landscaped area as a public demonstration.
B) Use gray water (water collected from runoff, from sinks, drinking fountains) to water landscaped
area.
C) Use low flow faucets, shower heads, and toilets. This can save 20% to 30% on water usage.
Financing by: Water is a very limited resource in Vail. Flows are inadequate in the winter to support a healthy trout
population between the golf course well field and the Forest Rd. water treatment plant. Conservation
can significantly improve flows along this reach of the stream. One Denver Hotel spent $29,700 on
water conservation devices and receives every year a savings of $30,000 in reduced water bills.
22
Response 83
Overview: Open Space/Landscaping
Scope/Size: A) Every effort should be made to preserve and enhance the stream tract along Lionshead. However,
this area is cut off from the Lionshead Mall area and few people see the Creek if they aze shopping in
Lionshead. The Creek should have clear access and be an amenity to Lionshead. Landscape
promenades could lead to Gore Creek and be incorporated into the circulation pattern of the Village. I
believe that natural vegetation should be maintained directly beside the creek and then a more man
made landscape, still using native vegetation, can occur directly beside the creek.
B) Somewhere in the Plan a educational opportunity could be provided to create a xeriscaped
landscaped demo project. The Alpine Gardens might also want a demo plot to simply advertise for the
Gardens.
C) Trail Signs. A tasteful kiosk could be provided that shows the pedestrian trail system both within
the Town and also on Vail Mt. and USFS lands. In addition interpretive opportunities could be
provided that would show people flora and fauna they may see in Vail. To build on that idea, an
interactive "touch" screen could be provided in this Kiosk to answer general questions.
D) Provide access to Gore Creek to accommodate fishing/viewing for special populations. This is an
idea that has been discussed with Vail Associates and could be accommodated at 2-3 points along
Gore Creek in the Lionshead area with a wood (recycled plastic) boardwalk to protect riparian
vegetation and to allow easy access.
Financing by: Through RETT the above mentioned projects could potentially be funded. However, I think buildings
as they are redeveloped could pay for appropriate improvements. The signs/Kiosk, although some
consider them clutter, provide needed information/direction for guests.
Response 84
Overview: Water Quality Protection
Scope/Size: A) Protect and enhance riparian areas. This could include finally doing a much needed enhancement
of a wetland area directly across the stream from the Born Free lift. This could be a wonderful
interpretive area to discuss wetland ecology. It also was a condition of approval for the VA Gondola
to some enhancement in this area.
B) Require oil & sand separators for parking areas.
C) Allow runoff to run over vegetated azeas rather than being directly discharged into Gore Creek.
D) Install vaulted detention basins to collect runoff and allow sediment to be trapped before being
discharged into the creek.
E) Design secondary containment for all storage areas for toxic products. Utilize non-toxic
alternatives when available.
Financing by: Protecting and enhancing water quality and riparian vegetation is critical to maintaining the character
of Vail and preserving the Gold Medal Fishery in Gore Creek. Based on retail sales from fishing retail
and guide stores, each fish in our Goid Medal Fishery has a return back to the Town of over $300.
Response 85
Overview: The recommended transportation hierarchy for Lionshead should be pedestrians, buses, shuttle
services, and then cars.
Response 86
Overview: Lionshead lacks unique retail qualities to attract people. A greater variety of retail should be pursued
to increase interest in the area.
23
Response 87
Overview: A farmers market has been discussed for Vail. Lionshead might be the place for such a market. This is
a very sustainable concept for a community by providing a place to buy locally produced food. It also
creates a much needed attraction in Lionshead to draw people into the area.
Response 88
Overview: Vail needs an indoor performing arts complex. Could this be done in conjunction with a convention
center/hotel?
Res onse 89
Overview: Lionshead needs more activity and people during the day. A hotel could provide additional activity
and people as well as some form of professional offices. When VA moved to the Seasons, the lunch
business went down significantly. Can we do anything through an enterprise zone to encourage
business backinto Lionshead?
Response 90
Overview: Day Care and Housing: To encourage business back into Vail and to also make Vail more of a
sustainable community we need to look for opportunities for locals housing and day care. I am
assuming Andy will have excellent comments on how to bring housing to Lionshead. NOTE: Lenders
are now considering energy efficiency in building design and allowing lower down payment for
energy efficient homes (since people won't have to pay so much money for utility bills -they can
afford a higher monthly).
Response 91
Overview: Save pocket park next to gondola. Maybe the city should acquire it.
Response 92
Overview: If really needed, put 5 star hotel across (south) from Gore Creek east of Chair 8 line.
Response 93
Overview: Expand bridge, include pedestrian walkway, etc.
Response 94
Overview: Reroute Frontage Road over to I-70 north where Vail maintenance shops are presently located.
Response 95
Overview: Include but do not cluster affordable housing.
Scope: Integrate in small numbers throughout the Village and Lionshead clustering almost always leads to
virtual ghettos and isolation.
Response 96
Overview: Reduce auto access.
Scope: Lionshead needs more exterior parking with jitney access to lodging (controlled golf carts and
snowmobi(es). Make it a walking village. It needs designated transportation stops and drop offs with
appropriate police to keep it flowing.
24
Response 97
Overview: 1. Pedestrian bridge from parking structure to mall entrance (east side)
2. Fresh retail shopping (no more t-shirt and/or sport shops)
3. An in-line skate park (like Stowe, VT)
4. Regentrification of exterior of buildings
5. A community hall for various gatherings (conventions, parties, entertainment, etc.)
Scope/Size: Turn in-line skate rink into ice skating rink in winter.
Financing by: 1. Tax abatement of property taxes for three years and require same collected to be funneled into
infrastructure.
Objective
advanced.• 1. A cohesive community. 2. entertainment for guests and residents. 3. increased sales tax revenue.
Primary/secondary
uses: Pedestrian bridge, in-line skate park, community hall, increased retail presence, new hotel (get rid of
old gondola building and Sunbird)
Square
footage: 1. bridge = 1000' sf. 2. in-line skate park = 1/4 mile 3. community ha11= 25,000 sf 4. retail=
30,000 sf. 5. new hotel = 100 rooms.
Access
requirements: 1. leave structure where it is 2. delivery area is enlarged 3. skier drop off happens now! Find a
designated space.
Response 98
Ovef-view: Lionshead works better than most people think. A redevelopment of Lionshead as an entire area is
notneeded.
Scope/Size: All that needs to be redeveloped are a small number of specific properties, such as the Sunbird Lodge
and Gondola Building.
Financing by: Private sector - the owners of the buildings to be redeveloped.
Objective
advanced: Improve the area without constantly going back to the tax payers.
Response 99
Overview: Find a way to encourage interesting / diverse / exciting retail enterprise.
Financing by: Through whatever means, we should all participate. Both landlords and the Town may need to make
concessions initially.
Objective
advanced.• Objectives 1 and 2. Currently suffer from the lack of stimulating retail offerings. Lionshead should
be a place people remember for the interesting shopping.
25
Response 100
Overview: l. Employee housing, especially seasonal is a mandatory requirement in redevelopment.
2. Performing arts center must be included.
Scope/Size: 1. Housing units must exceed what is presently there and should include seasonal units over the
parking structure.
2. The P.A. center should be capable of holding large performances.
Financing by: 1. TOV and VA - VA should be leaned on heavily in the housing area as they almost single handedly
cause the problem
2. TOV
Response 101
Overview: Implement and encourage lots of street entertainment.
Scope/Size: Similar to the $15-20K spent by the TOV in the past summer entertainment in the mall, initiate a
program 30-40 hours a week, year round. At an average of $150/hour this would cost $250-300K per
year.
Financing by: Perhaps a business improvement district. The only problem with that is the lack of participation from
the rest of Vail. While Lionshead residents/businesses stand to benefit the most, there is also inherent
value in Lionshead's success to everyone in Vail.
Objective
advanced: This would directly advance policy objectives 1 and 2. It would indirectly help occupancies (3).
Primary/secondary
uses: Everything from one person acts like juggiers, clowns and magicians to musical trios, quartets, etc. to
larger choirs, dance troupes, pipe bands, etc.
Square
footage: One of Lionshead's problems is all the unused square footage. This would utilize it better.
Access
reguirements: Nothing included here that we don't already do - just higher frequency. It shouldn't require any
additional access or infrastructure.
Response102
Overview: Recognize that individual properties will not upgrade, renovate, etc. without some incentives. If we
wait for market forces to justify the economics, it will be too late.
Scope/Size: The only real, viable incentive the Town has to offer is density. I think the vast majority of us don't
want "another Beaver Creek" in terms of density. So what can we live with? What is the current,
overall Lionshead density? What is Beaver Creek's? What makes sense in the middle?
Objective
advanced: Way to encourage redevelopment, all of the policy objectives could ultimately be advanced this way.
Response 103
Overview: Renewal and Development - Make the facades of the buildings more uniform. Some of this was done
to the stores to the east of the gondola. Replacing wrought iron railings on balconies with something
with softer lines, curves, more of an Austrian feel might give some charm and continuity. Maybe iron
railings with snowflakes, wildflowers or hummingbirds. Additional flower beds, sculptures and
benches. Great colorful awnings.
Vitality and Amenities - Adding Adventure Ridge was brilliant! Concert there in the summer would
be nice. Additional seating would be nice and sales might recoup the cost. A family restaurant like
the Hubcap that also serves breakfast would be nice. A piano bar in the evening although Lionshead
does not need more restaurants or night life activities.
Stronger Economic Base - The parking structure is the only place to put a hotel. What are the
occupancy rates of the Marriott and Westin? As long as there are normal vacancies then adding beds
makes no sense. Do not add floors to existing buildings - sunlight is essential.
, Improved Infrastructure - Why does garbage pick up begin at the crack of dawn?
Response 104
Overview: Establish firm building height limitations and generous public view corridors.
Frequent, reliable and courteous public bus transportation with strict limitations on private vehicle use
of the bus route.
Maintain or increase the number of employee housing facilities on the outer edge of the Lionshead
area.
Res onse 105
Overview: An environmentally friendly mall like Boulder's Pearl Street.
Response 106
Overview: An update is critical. Concerned about the height of the proposed VA buildings. Concerned about
view corridors which are paramount to any improvement.
Scope/Size: Landscaping is paramount - Lionshead is predominantly steel and concrete - very cold.
Financing by: Public-private.
Objective
advanced: Lionshead is a mess - it is a blight. Needs to be developed as part of the mountain environment
without excessive heights of buildings. Upgrades of existing buildings and a lot of open space.
Primary/secondary
uses: Primary - create an open spaced, mountain friendly village that increases conventions and winter and
summer bookings being careful to address height and mass concerns. Secondary - improve access
west of Concert Hall Plaza.
Res onse 107
Overview: Performing arts and community center. Gymnasium, classroom type multi-purpose rooms (meetings,
classes, lectures, etc.), performing and visual arts.
Scope/Size: Seat 350-400 people, great acoustics, foyer area for art displays. IMAX during times when no arts
stuff- can two stages be combined?
Financing by: Have penthouses and condos on top to pay part of the use. Some public financing (grants), special tax
since this is a community thing.
Objective
advanced: Brings activity to Lionshead, creation of civic type center with Doubloon, Library. Community center
will impart pride.
Primary/secondary
uses: I'erforming arts center, gym, ballet class, meeting rooms, small kitchen, visual arts display, small
shower rooms, 2-3 penthouses condominiums.
Square
footage: This should not be a towering bu?lding. At least the bottom two floors should be below ground.
Infrastructure
requirements: Great acoustics, gym would need to be regulation size.
Access
requirements: Parking and buses right there. Delivery area.
Response 108
Overview: A percent for arts programs should be included. This could be used to enhance both buildings and
streetscapes.
Scope/Size: Help reinforce the aesthetic character and build and stronger sense of place.
Financing by: Private funds to enhance the scope of the project and help build community "ownership". Through
public and private funds as well as grants and foundation support.
Objective
advanced: Strengthen redevelopment. Improve infrastructure. Promotes sense of `world class' destination and
signature landmark.
Response109
Overview: A conference facility.
Scope/Size: Located on east end of parking structure. Size should be based on market demand.
Financing by: TOV and public financing.
Objective
advanced: Policy objective #2.
Response110
Overview: Redo the skier's bridge. Should be a centerpiece - what people think of when they think of
Lionshead.
Scope/Size: Stunning architectural design - perhaps stone. No wider than it is now.
Financing by: Public and VA.
Objective
advanced.• Could be a symbol of the new Lionshead.
Primary/secondary
uses: 1. Skiers returning to the gondola. 2. Access to the mountain for hikers, etc.
Responselll
Overview: Basketball court.
Scope/Size: Sandstone School gym.
Financing by: No
Objective
advanced: No.2
Primary/secondary
uses: Primary - recreational basketball.
Response 112
Overview: Grocery like Alfalfa's. Could be combined with movie theater. Objective would be to reduce overall
number of t-shirt shops.
Scope/Size: Same as Alfalfa's.
Financing by.• Private.
Objective
advanced: No.2.
Primary/secondary
uses: A place where people can conveniently shop for food at reasonable prices. People enjoy going to the
movies. This would give another dimension to the Lionshead experience.
Response 113
Overview: Park and playground: like the pirate ship.
Scope/Size: South side of Gore Creek opposite Three Tops condos.
Financing by: TOV and VA.
Objective
advanced: Enhanced guest experience - No. 2.
Primary/secondary
uses: Used by people not planning on skiing. Great for families and children.
Response 114
Overview: Ice hockey rink to take care of current demand.
Scope/Size: Locate at east end of parking structure.
Financing by: Public - private.
Objective
advanced: No.2
Primary/secondary
uses: Hockey games, professional team practice, recreational use.
Response 115
Overview: State of the art visitor center. Could offer complete reservation services- lodging, transportation,
activities, dining. Historical displays could be developed. Large restroom, short term parking.
Scope/Size: Visible from the Frontage Road and the highway. Triple the size of the existing center.
Financing by: Public.
Objective
advanced: If we entice a day visitor to stay overnight then everyone prospers. Pedestrian village makes it hard
for first time guests to know what is here.
Primary/secondary
uses: Information, audio-visual and fax service, historical display, small meeting room, large restroom,
short term parking, storage, office space.
Res onse 116
Overview: Multi-media meeting room with connections to other sites. Adjoining office space containing
computers, faxes, printers, phones for business travelers.
Scope/Size: Idea hinges on a convention center hotel.
Financing by: VA hotel would pay initially, ultimately becomes self supporting.
Objective
advanced: Vitality and amenities. Opening shots of each telecast would contain shots of Vail. Satellite meetings
broaden the convention market business.
Primary/secondary
uses: Convention hotel, meeting space, office space, expert employees.
Response117
Overview: Farmers market with flower stalls, fresh produce. Gazebo for band, picnic tables everywhere on
heated platforms.
Objective
advanced: User friendly festive atmosphere.
Response118
Overview: Entry sign into the parking structure.
Response119
Overview: A consultant or a police officer trained in crime prevention through environmental design should be
retained at some point to ensure that the final product does not provide opportunities for crime and
disorder.
Response120
Overview: Maintain existing views (from Lifthouse Condominiums). If they are not maintained it will decrease
property values, decrease rentals, impact the decks of restaurants, increase liability from ice build up
in mall.
Responsel2l
Overview: Finish community center concept by placing the library and ice arena next to one another.
Second ice surface.
Scope/Size: Incorporate into the lower level of another project.
Feasibility
studies: VRD has done pro forma work on this.
Response122
Overview: Conference center - a gathering place for graduations, performances, etc. Would inject some vitality
into lodging business in shoulder seasons.
Feasibiliry
studies: Completed in conjunction with proposal for performing arts center several years ago. Talk to
Keystone.
Response 123
Overview: 1. Indoor performance center.
2. improve access and sense of entry into village as well as streetscape and traffic throughout
3. creative re-engineering of the exteriors of existing buildings
4. optimize the retail/restaurantlentertainment mix
Scope/Size: 1. Large enough to permit commercially viable theater and music and handle local needs.
Feasibility
studies: 1. Pro forma and program has been done and simply needs to be updated.
Res onse 124
Overview: Truck delivery terminal to provide partial or total support for both Lionshead and Village.
Response125
Overview: If expansion of parking is required, do so in structures on the west and north of Lionshead day skier
parking lots and/or expand capacity of existing structure.
Response126
Overview: Locate regional mass transit center in conjunction with a parking structure.
Response127
Overview: Complete South Frontage Road traffic flow improvements including eastbound I-70 off ramp west of
Lionshead, realignment of South Frontage Road north and west of VA maintenance, roundabouts at
key intersections between the main Vail roundabout and the west Vail entrance. Reduce the net
amount of asphalt surfacing associated with all aspects of redevelopment.
Response128
Overview: Complete civic center complex with performing arts center at east end of parking structure.
Response 129
Overview: Complete West Meadow Drive streetscape plan to improve safety for pedestrians, bikers and bladers
by establishing the street as a non-motorized route. Divert all non-essential traffic onto the Frontage
Road including non-essential bus and high speed bike traffic.
Response 130
Overview: Establish wildlife and riparian habitat nature preserves in wetland areas and on stream tracts.
Responsel3l
Overview: Provide service access to Vail Mountain for maintenance equipment and personnel on routes and in a
manner that minimize conflict with established residential areas.
Response 132
Overview: Renovate Lionshead park so that it meets the health and environmental requirements.
Scope/Size: An escape for families from shops and crowds.
Financing by: The Town.
Objective
advanced: Provide entertainment for young people.
Primary/secondary
uses: Play ground and picnic area.
Square
footage: Already exists.
Infrastructure
requirements: New equipment that meets health codes.
Access
requirements: Pedestrian only. "Hidden" aspect is enjoyed.
Response 133
Overview: Larger youth center. Current one needs a better space - like Adventure Ridge but in Vail where the
Town can profit from tax revenues.
S'cope/Size: East end of parking structure, the area west of the Cascade Club, part of West Day Lot.
Objective
advanced: Renewal of youth in Vai 1, vitality and amenities for guests, improve circulation -]ess kids on Bridge
Street.
Primary/secondary
uses: Youth center, family activities center, day camp.
Access
requirements: No parking needed if it is at east of parking structure.
Architectural/Site
studies: Old Austrian style would be very nice. Lots of flowers and drawings on buildings.
Literature: Aspen has a nice facility with youth run cafe, exercise room, computer lab, dance area.
Response 134
Overview: 1. Space for quite restaurant that serves three meais.
2. Walking trails maintained in winter.
Response 135
Overview: Park.
Scope/Size: Dead spot near Ski School, east of gondola north of creek.
Financing by: Public. Replaces one Town shut last year.
Objective
advanced: 1, 2 and 4.
Response136
Overview: Second Sheet of ice with dry land training rooms and weight equipment. Maybe more than one need
met - ice and convention? ice and community?
Scope/Size: East end of parking structure.
Financing by: Public and private.
Objective
advanced: Increased revenues, more community functions.
Primary/secondary
uses: Concerts, tournaments, ice shows, more skating, conventions.
Response 137
Overview: Skate board park.
Scope/Size: Old Lionshead park area, east end of structure or part of structure.
Financing by: The Town.
Objective
advanced: A place for youth to hang to stay off ramps and main pedestrian areas.
Primary/secondary
uses: Skate board park maybe removable in winter.
Infrastructure
requirem ents: I nsurance.
Response138
Overview: New gymnastics facility, maybe a shared space.
Scope/Size: Tear down existing building and rebuild.
Objective
advanced: Redevelopment of a tired building.
Primary/secondary
uses: Gymnastics, wrestling, ski conditioning, ballet, community center, youth center.
Response 139
Overview: Planetarium, Children's Museum/hands on museum, Wet `n Wild, Museum of Skiing, Oil, Sports, etc.
Performing arts center with multi-media facility with broadcast capabilities.
Response 140
Overview: State of the art TV8 studio.
Scope/Size: On main pedestrian thoroughfare, beachfront. Modeled on Today Show. Main offices and
production elsewhere.
Response 141
Overview: Achieve same quality and feeling as Village - not perceived as two separate entities. Concerned about
height and mass of new buildings. Maintain or create public view and access to mountain, Gore
Creek. Incorporate properties west of Concert Hall to make them part of Lionshead.
Response 142
Overview: 1. Create a better connection between Lionshead and Village.
2. Civic area around ice arena and library with a building on the RV parking - community center and
conference center, council chambers and government offices. Land at 75 S. Frontage Road could be
made into employee housing.
3. Magic carpet like DIA to get people and equipment to mountain from structure, or maybe valet
service.
4. Use tourist bunker more effectively or get rid of it.
5. Market Vail as a total experience instead of Vail or Lionshead.
Scope/Size: 1. Improved landscaping, signage and the presence of community hosts. Create as much "storefront
activity" as possible on north side of Meadow Drive. Perhaps storefront access on brick wall of
hospital. Important retail opportunities alongside the structure. Long term buy properties on Meadow
Drive to phase into retail.
Objective
advanced.• Policy objectives 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Response 143
Overview: Get rid of large vehicle parking at east end of structure. Area between large vehicle parking and Vail
International condos is unkempt, unlandscaped and debris-laden.
Scope/Size: After unloading, park busses in a commercial area somewhere else. Landscape and hide the whole
area. Patrol the area carefully and issue large fines for overnight parking. No large trucks permitted.
Plantings near Vail International are needed.
Response 144
Overview: Net increase in locals' housing.
Financing by: Public and/or private.
Objective
advanced: Stronger economic base - more locals increase retail activity. Improved infrastructure - housing in
town will allow snow plow drivers to live in town.
Response145
Overview: Improved circulation at bus stop at Lion Square Lodge.
Financing by: Public-private partnerships.
Objective
advanced: Improved access and circulation.
Primary/secondary
uses: Skier drop off, bus stop (lighted and sheltered).
Response146
Overview: Bury the interchange/conflict area where pedestrians and buses, trucks, vehicles meet by west end of
parking structure, main bus stop. Have motor traffic go below grade and resurface by ice arena. Exit
points could be created for condos.
Financing by: Public safety issue and ought to be addressed by the Town and a private group who may redevelop
any portion of the parking structure.
Objective
advanced: Improved access and circulation.
Response 147
Overview: A Sonnenalp in place of the Sunbird would be nice. Performing arts center perhaps tied in with
convention facilities.
Financing by: Some of the people who benefited from the recent public offering.
Objective
advanced: Brings more people to Lionshead businesses.
Primary/secondary
uses: Theater, music, convention, view corridors important, landscaping or at least a tree in the center of the
oval area.
Access
requirements: Shuttle buses on performance nights.
Res onse148
Overview: Increased employee housing on the outskirts. Control mass, height and density of new construction.
Original zoning heights must be enforced.
Response 149
Overview: Employee housing at a reasonable cost.
Scope/Size: Hotel or hostel for employees capable of housing 100 at affordable rates by month or season.
Financing by: Mostfy public with some contributions from businesses needing the facility. Responsibility is with the
Town so should be public.
Primary/secondary
uses: Primary - housing.
Square
footage: Two or three stories to include laundry, lounges.
Access
requirements: Parking.
Response 150
Overview: 1. Ice rink placed on grade at east end of parking oriented north south.
2. Ice rink similar to 41 but lowered one level below grade oriented east west.
3. Ice rink placed on top of parking garage structure oriented east west.
Literature: See Zehren and Associates letter 5 July 1996 with attached sketches.
Response151
Overview: Mixed use redevelopment of the Gondola and Sunbird Lodge properties, Lot 4, Block 1, VaiULionshead
First Filing and Lot 2, Block 1, VaiULionshead, Third Filing and portions of Tract C.
Scope/Size: Approximately two acres of developable foot print and constituting multiple building masses comprising
an aggregate 450-475,000 sq. ± built in structures ranging from 2 to approximately 9 stories in height.
Financing by: Construction will be paid for primarily by private funds, except for any public or quasi-public
improvements which may be made in pedestrian or circulation zones or which might be incorporated into
broader public services, such as delivery and trash systems. Components of a public or quasi-public nature
might be paid for through tax increment financing or other means.
Objective
udvanced: Redevelopment of the core properties of VA would remove currently underutilized and unattractive
structures which are not the highest and best use of real estate. Replacement of these buildings with
mixed use facilities will increase vitality, add retail, increase bed base, enhance aesthetic character of
the architecture, improve circulation, pazking.
Primary/secondary
uses: Very broad mixed uses including lodging, hotel rooms, fractional fee or interval ownership, high
density multi-family, retail, food and beverage operations, ski base operations, service functions,
parking.
Sq uare
footage: Retail-approximately 60-75,000 sq. ft.; lodging or hote180-120,000 sq. ft.; condominiums and/or
fractional fee 150,000 sq. ft.; ski operations and service 80-90,000 sq. ft; plus circulation and
underground parking.
Infrastructure
Requirements: Not presently known but it is anticipated that plaza areas and pedestrian circulation might be entirely
snow melted.
Access
requirements: Access would require entry through Tract G Vail / Lionshead III Filing. Might be possible for some
purposes through the North Day Lot.
Cost studies: Very preliminary but in the range of $100-110 million.
Res onse 152
Overview: Rezone North Day lot to allow for mixed use development, possible skier drop off at the Frontage
Road, and connection through structure or new building mass via Tract C to tlle VAI core parcels.
Scope/Size: Being studied.
Financing by: Construction will be paid for primarily by private funds. Public or quasi-public improvements such as
drop off and pedestrian connections might be paid for with public funds or with tax increment
financing sources.
Objective
advanced: Redevelopment of the North Day Lot and the creation of a connection to the core would certainly
bring added vitality to Lionshead and perhaps improve access and circulation on a north-south axis
from the Frontage Road or pedestrian overpass to the ski yard. Possibility of drop off or other
infrastructure improvements might enhance vehicular and as well pedestrian circulation in the area.
Development of a mixed use product in this area might be used to increase live beds or support the
creation of additional lodging or hospitality products. Redevelopment of what is a presently an
underutilized site could assist in providing additional life to Lionshead as well as open a new gate or
portal to the community and improve its aesthetic character.
Primary/secondary
uses: Drop off, vehicular entry, parking, lodging and hospitality, fractional fee or interval uses, high density
multi- family, retail, skier services and/or operational offices, employee housing units, lodging
amenities such as meeting space, exercise and pool facilities and other currently permitted
Commercial Core 2 uses.
Access
requirements: Frontage road improvements, perhaps turning lane and curb cut improvements, new pedestrian
connections, identifiable bus drop off zone on the north side of the lot would be required.
Response 153
Overview: Vail/Lionshead first filing, block two, including the Lionshead public parking structure and Lionshead
circle, together with the air rights associated over the I-70 right of way immediately to the north of the
Lionshead parking structure should be considered for rezoning or new zoning permitting a wide
variety of uses of both private and public natures.
Financing by: Combination of private and public funding, partnerships between the private and public sectors, and
perhaps tax increment financing.
Objective
advanced: Air rights over the current parking structure and the I-70 road right of way, together with all rights
associated with property at the east end of the parking structure, are currently underutilized. If these
spaces were to be employed for various private and public sector uses a new point of entry and
character could be established in Lionshead at its north eastern perimeter. New live beds could be
created in this area without substantial disruption to surrounding properties and the vitality and life of
this area might be enhanced with additional retail, lodging and residential uses. In the long term,
bridging over the interstate to utilize the air rights might provide added park or green space
opportunities as well as redevelopment opportunities and make a physical and psychological
connection between Vail north of the highway and Vail south of the highway. On the east end of the
structure a variety of public uses might be contemplated including additional ice surfaces, community
center facilities, performing arts, and/or convention or meeting spaces. Public uses such as these
would then be clustered next to current uses such as the library and Dobson Arena and serve as the
focal point link between Vail Village and Lionshead.
Primary/secondary
uses: Ice rink, community center, performing arts center, conference center, lodging and hotel, fractional
fee or interval ownership products, multi family high density residential, low density residential, retail
and commercial, transportation facilities, parking, public parks, employee or affordable housing, and
any other uses currently contemplated in Commercial Core 2 zoning.
Feasibility
studies: Ice rink study - see attached.
References: Any literature, articles, or photographs regarding similar facilities that could be used as a reference or
would help us understand the ideas or intent of the party submitting the Wish List items. (Please
attach. )
Response154
Overview: The south side of the Lionshead parking structure at street level should be rezoned to consider or
allow for street level retail uses with residential housing above, coupled with pedestrian enhancements
of East Lionshead Circle.
Scope/Size: Along the entire front of the parking structure on the south side, buildings could be constructed and
set off of the structure to preserve its "open" air handling requirements, while still creating a
meaningfully sized retail bay along the length of the structure. One to two stories of residential
product for sale without restriction or in part restricted as employee housing might be constructed
above.
Financing by: This development would involve public-private partnership financing.
Objective
advanced.• Improvement of the East Lionshead Circle with retail and housing would bring added life and vitality
to what is presently a dead and under utilized zone along the parking structure. Landscaping and
streetscape enhancements could greatly improve the pedestrian and guest experience and connect in a
meaningful way Lionshead with the public facilities in the area of Dobson Arena and beyond to the
Vail Village center. Pedestrian improvements in this zone might formalize the streetscape and
improve what is now a very poor pedestrian condition during the winter months.
Primary/secondary
uses: Retail, commercial, food and beverage, high and low density multi family, employee housing.
Access
requirements: Parking could be served within the structure itself. Improved pedestrian walks along the streetscape.
Response 155
Overview: Rezone the West Day Lot to permit mixed use development including all uses currently compatible
with Commercial Core 2, parking, fractional fees or interval properties, high density multi-family,
conference or meeting centers and lodging and hotel rooms.
Financing by: Private funds and perhaps public-private partnership financing for conference or other public
facilities.
Objective
advanced: The addition of hospitality products or the expansion of hospitality products on a site currently zoned
for and utilized only for surface parking would enhance the vitality and life of Lionshead.
Aesthetically and functionally, development of this west end site could create a defined entry or gate
into Lionshead from the west. Additional hotel beds tied to a conference or meeting facility might
bolster the shoulder seasons.
Primary/secondary
uses: Parking, lodging and hospitality, retail, food and beverage, meeting and conference facilities,
fractional fee or interval property, multi-family high density residences and other uses currently
permitted by Commercial Core II zoning.
Infrastructure
requirements: Conference facilities located at this site might require fiber optics, external satellite dish or other
electronic access connection. Access requirements are presently unknown pending additional
programming and site study.
Response156
Overview: Employee housing should be considered a permitted use, rather than a conditional use in the arterial
commercial district, specifically for the Holy Cross parcel. Further, EHU designations as defined in
the Vail code should be rendered more flexible, allowing for a broader variety of employee housing
unit types.
Scope/Size: The Holy Cross employee housing project could conceivably contain 40-50 employee housing units
of approximately 650 sq. ft. each in a four to four and half story building. Each employee housing
unit would contain two bedrooms with living and dining, shared kitchen and two baths. Surface
parking for 72 spaces could be made available on the site. Additional common dining of 3,200 sq.
might be included.
Financing by: Private funds would likely be utilized to pay for the construction of the Holy Cross employee housing
if it were a VA project alone.
Objective
advanced: Employee housing on the VA site would advance the policy objective and ground rules by retaining
vitality from full time residents in the Lionshead area and replace the employee housing of the
Sunbird Lodge.
Primary/secondary
uses: Empioyee housing, surface parking, and common dining, entertaining and socializing areas on the
Holy Cross site.
InfrasCructure
requirenzents: Sq. ft. requirements for the building would be on the order of 42,00= sq. ft. Surface parking would
reyuire approximately 22,000 sq. ft.
Access
requirements: A local bus stop would be ideal for local employees to move through the town without the need of an
automobile.
Architectural/Site
studies: See attached.
Response 157
Over-view: Long range consideration might be given to rezoning the Service Center and Holy Cross as
Commercial Core 2 areas, subject to revised permitted uses, including fractional fees, and assembling
the properties with tlle West Day Lot by relocating the Frontage Road to the north side of the Service
Center and Holy Cross lots.
Scope/Size: A public/private partnership would probably be required for this concept.
Objective
advanced: Lot assemblage might greatly improve vehicular circulation and increase potential bed base.
Primary/secondary
uses: All uses currently permitted in Commercial Core 2, plus additional fractional fee and services
functions.
Response 158
Overview: The unplatted ground to the south of Gore Creek presently under lease to the Vail Rec. Districts and
utilized for tennis courts should be platted and zoned Commercial Core 2 permitting all uses of a
revised Commercial Core 2 zoning designation, including a fractional fee. Alternatively this area
might rezoned to single family residential, primary/secondary residential, residential cluster, low
density, or medium multi-family district.
Scope/Size: A hotel development on this site might likely comprise 200-250 rooms and be accessed by a vehicular
bridge built across Gore Creek at the Lionshead P(ace Circle. Residential densities might range from
3.5 d.u. to 11 d.u. per acre.
Financing by: Financing or construction on this site will be made by private funding.
Objective
advanced: A hotel built on this site would increase the vitality and activity of Lionshead, increase live beds,
provide a strong link across the stream, and allow for landscaped stream and slope side enhancements
in an area that is already developed. In the alternative, if a lower density residential product were
created it would replace a poorly located athletic facility with residences more in keeping with the
surrounding uses on the south side of the creek along Forest Road.
Primary/secondary
use.s: Uses included would be all of those currently allowed within Commercial Core 2 if the property were
zoned for that function, together with any new allowed uses such as fractional fee, etc. If a lower
residential product were permitted it would include single family residential dwellings, two family
residential dwellings and perhaps low or medium residential dwellings together with residential uses
typically allowed in those zoning categories.
Infrasti•ucture
reguirements: If a hotel were constructed on the south side of the stream a bridge for vehicular use would be
required in the vicinity of the circle at Lionshead Place.
Architectural/Site
studies: See attached.
Response159
Overview: The east end of the parking structure, currently a surface lot, should be considered as a potential for a
second ice rink, a community center, and multi-purpose or function performance and conference
facilities.
Scope/Size: The rink would have limited seating and function primarily as a secondary or support surface to the
primary facility at Dobson. The performing arts or multi-function facility might seat anywhere from
1,000 to 2,500 people.
Financing by: Funding should be provided by public agencies, perhaps tax increment financing, and private
contribution or donation.
Objective
advanced: Redevelopment of this area with community or civic uses would create a clustered civic center
between the Vail Village and the Lionshead cores. It would serve to physically and psychologically
link the components of the town providing a more coherent identity and sense of place for all of Vail.
The amenities would be particularly useful for the public, enhance offerings to the guests, and
increase community interaction within Vail.. These facilities could likewise support and serve the
increased bed base. TaY increment financing might be employed in a creative way to construct these
facilities without increasing general property or sales taxes or burdening the town's general fund
Primary/secondary
uses: Primary and secondary uses might include local or community activities such as meetings, small
performance areas, an expanded youth center, ice skating, a gymnasium, dance studios and flexible
performing arts, and/or meeting spaces.
Access '
requirements: Drop off for this facility should occur on its north side near the Frontage Road so that traffic would
not need to come down East Lionshead Circle. This drop off along the Frontage Road should be
integrated and not conflict with the parking structure entry or exit.
Architectural/Site
studies: None, except for very preliminary ice rink studies previously incorporated with parking structure
revisions.
Response 160
Overview: Riparian stream enhancement should be made to Gore Creek in the Lionshead area including
structural enhancements for fish habitat and perhaps the creation of ponds and enhanced wetlands in
or adjacent to the current stream tract owned by the town. In addition, in those areas where the stream
walk has been built from the library to the sewage treatment plant, landscaping improvements along
the stream bank shou(d be implemented.
Financing by: Public funding, perhaps with private contribution.
Objective
advanced: The stream itself and the stream tract sunounding it are significant amenities and natural resources for
the Lionshead area. Enhancement of the resources it would counter balance and compliment the
highly urban nature of Lionshead.
Primary/secondary
uses: Square footage requirements associated with the primary and secondary uses.
Response 161
Overview: The Frontage Road should be improved through the Lionshead area including repaving, formalization
of a pedestrian path along its length, landscape improvements, the introduction of turning lanes and
entry or other identifying signage for the Lionshead area.
Financing by: Public funds and perhaps tax increment financing might be utilized to pay for street improvements to
the Frontage Road.
Objective
advanced: Access into and circulation around the Lionshead neighborhood could be greatly improved with
Frontage Road enhancements. Currently there is no continuous, safe pedestrian path along the
northern perimeter of Lionshead and t11is might be improved with a formal sidewalk. The identity and
sense of place of Lionshead would be improved with landscaping and informational signage along its
northern perimeter.
Response 162
Overview.• Expand or amend the Commercial Core 2 zone to include, permit, and allow for high density multi-
family and SDD zoned projects, which are currently approved, existing andlor grandfathered in or
near the Commercial Core 2 District such as the Marriott and the Vail Spa. These areas which are
physically contiguous to the Commercial Core 2 District and functionally a part of it should be
considered and planned for in a common manner. In addition to physically expanding the zone
district, its uses should be made as flexible as possible, allowing for mixed use of all sorts which
broadly touch upon lodging, hospitality, retail, food and beverage, commercial and residential and
parking uses. Hospitality products should be broaclly defined and should include fractional fee,
interval ownership or other time share or club type property types.
Objective
advanced: An expanded, integrated, and flexible zone district is necessary to effect renewal and redevelopment
in the Lionshead area. If the identity and aesthetics of Lionshead are to improve we must rethink
regulatory constraints so that they permit and encourage these improvements rather than frustrate
them. In addition, if our hospitality offerings are to remain strong and grow stronger new products
must be permitted and provided for in our master plan and the zoning regulations which govern our
district. Allowing fractional fee or other new hospitality products is a way to increase both the
number and variety of live beds in our community.
Response163
Overview: The master plan and the zoning ordinances which arise from it should permit or allow for density
bonuses in consideration for property owners or developers undertalcing or making development
commitments which benefit or serve public policies. For example, density bonuses should be granted
to incent redevelopment and renovation of older builder to provide for facade or exterior
enhancements which conform to new design guide(ines and which improve the aesthetic character of
Lionshead. In addition density bonuses should be granted for the creation of employee housing
within the Vail community and more specifically for employee housing integrated into the Lionshead
sites. In addition to the concept of density bonuses for specific redevelopment commitments, greater
density or GRFA should be granted for under developed sites in the Lionshead area. These sites
might be construed as "in fill" sites which are presently not fully utilized. Parking areas or parking
structures might be employed as additional building sites to permit "in fill" development rather than
sprawl in outlining areas. Increased density and GRFA could be accomplished in tandem with land
planning principles and new design guidelines which were ignored or unheard of in Lionshead's
original development. Added density can be achieved while actually enhancing
Objective
advanced: An architect attending one of the Lionshead public forums made the comment that density equals life
and vitality. The very concept of a town is based on the notion that people live, work and in our case,
recreate, in close proximity to one another and enjoy the vitality and energy of human interaction.
Density can be employed to make the community more vibrant and appealing and provide physical
points to focus human interaction and the critical mass necessary to support and sustain activities and
the establishments which offer them. In the case of Lionshead, density bonuses might incent the
improvement of the aesthetic character of the physical surroundings, increase the number of live beds
and guests and lodging in the area and allow for increased numbers of employees and locals to reside
in the Lionshead vicinity to this neighborhood whiie using the tools of the market place to support
these goals. Incentives of these kinds may be more useful in achieving these goals than regulatory
constraints which are counter productive given the economics of renewal, remodeling and
redevelopment.
Response 164
Overview: Through density bonuses or other incentives or through the power of eminent domain the Concert
Hall Plaza building should be redeveloped and a direct, open, effective pedestrian corridor created
from the Lionshead plaza directly to the west in the vicinity of the Marriott.
Scope/Size: The Concert Hall Plaza and its present retail might be rebuilt and significantly expanded by rebuilding
to the north where the current fire lane is. This retail redevelopment might likewise be coordinated
with a possible redevelopment of the Landmark Townhomes which is being considered by one or
more members of that property association.
Financing by.• A combination of public and private funds might pay for this redevelopment. If an urban renewal or
downtown development authority or district were created, funds from tax increment financing might
be utilized to acquire, create or build the new pedestrian connection that would link "West Lionshead"
to the central plaza and with added density a combined Concert Hall Plaza and Landmark Townhome
redevelopment might be financially profitable enough to justify demolition and rebuilding.
Objective
advanced: Opening a new connection through the west end of the Plaza to the vicinity of the Marriott would
provide a pedestrian link where none exists today and effectively tie the west end of Lionshead into its
central core. The vitality and connection of the community would be greatly enhanced as would
opportunities for effective pedestrian and public transit into an through the western half of
Lionshead.
Primary/secondary
uses: All permitted Commercial Core II uses.
Response165
Overview: Expand Dobson Ice Arena to the south and east. Improve interior to increase seating capacity.
Scope/Size: Phase I will be to increase the seating by 1,000, while Phase II is the addition of two NHL style locker
rooms, a multi purpose room and junior hockey offices. All additional square footage will be added
below ground level thus preserving the integrity of the immediate area.
Financing by: Through the VRD capital funds.
Objective
advanced: Renewal and redevelopment of the Arena, increased traffic and thus vitality and an increased
opportunity for Vail to host conferences / concerts / special events and other tax generating events.
Primary/secondary
uses: The expanded facility wili continue to host events of up to 3,500 participants but will continue to do
so on a larger scale. '
Square
footage: This expansion will add 7,500 square feet to the facility.
Architectural/Site
studies: See attached floor plan.
Cost studies: See attached proposed budget.
Feasibiliry
studies: See attached potential revenue/expense statement.
lZesqonse 166
Overview: Second ice surface on the east end of the parking structure. The building would be constructed so that
any type of facility can be located on top of the ceiling of the second ice surface, which will serve as
the foundation.
Scope/Size: The facility would be a basement type building with a reinforced roof engineered to support a
structure on top. The ice surface would be an NHL size rink (200' x 85') with seating for 500
spectators. The interior square footage of the facility will be approximately 24,000 square feet.
Financing by: The facility would be funded through either a public-private partnership or public bond revenues
through a public election.
Objective
advanced: Increased vitality, added amenities, stronger economic base.
Primary/secondary
uses: Used exclusively for hockey, ice skating and other ice related events. The new facility would free up
Dobson for other special events, concerts, conferences and other sales tax generation events.
Square
footage: 24,000 square feet.
Infrastructure
requirements: Roof engineered to support another structure.
Access
requirements: Interlink the second ice surface with Dobson to enable participants to walk from one event to another
without exiting. Parking should be ample as it will be next to the parking structure.
Architectural/Site
studies: Drawings are currently underway with Group Naoum, and should be completed by April 15, 1997.
Cost studies: See attached proposed budget.
Feasibiliry
studies: See attached potential revenue / expenditure statement.
References: See attached brochure.
Response 167
Overview: Redevelopment should have one objective - improvement of the charm, ambiance and character of
Lionshead, moving close to that of the Village. This would limit height, size (mass) and require
specific architectural design considerations.
Scope/Size: Overall architectural design and layout.
Financing by: Vail Associates, as they will now.
Objective
advanced: Village has more European charm and character. Lionshead master plan should seek to improve these
qualities thus increasing overall appeal of Vail as preferred resort.
.
Primary/secondary
uses: To be determined by architectural design, height and size limitations.
Access
requirements: Determined by design objective.
References: Positive overall character of St. Anjon, Austria versus negatives of Tignes, France.
Response 168
Overview: Make Lionshead Plaza another main point of arrival and departure.
Scope/Size: Redevelop into the main skier pick-up and drop-off area. Develop nice pedestrian access between the
gondola building and the one next to it.
Financing by.• VA, TOV
Objective
advanced: Better pedestrian access, better access to the gondola. Eliminate skier drop off by the transportation
side (parking structure side).
Primary/secondary
uses: Skier drop off and pick up, pedestrian access to the gondola, move Beaver Creek down valley buses
to the parking structure facility.
Response169
Overview: Policy that would limit building height, high population density per area, congested traffic, parking
and obstruction of public view corridors. There must be appropriate delivery and customer access and
the natural landscape of the mountain environment should be preserved. Finally, continued growth in
Vail means a need for increased employee housing.
Response170
Overview: A second ice surface as part of Dobson. Additional rooms in this recreation complex such as a ballet
room, weight training room could be used by both skaters and groups in the community.
Scope/Size: Location: connected or adjacent to Dobson. Minimal seating (100 people), locker rooms, rest rooms
and warming area (can be used for spectators - 10 to 50 person capacity).
Financing by: Private and public-private partnership financing.
Objective
advanced: Vitality and amenities: a second ice arena would increase the potential for hockey and figure skating
events, camps and local programs.
Primary/secondary
uses: Primary: ice surface for figure skating and hockey practice. Dobson would still be the primary arena
for seating, concerts, etc. Secondary: a ballet room, weight training room that could double as a
facility for youth activities.
Square
footage: Locker rooms and bathrooms 2,000 sf, ice surface 200' x 85' = 17,000 sf, additional rooms (2) at
1,300 sf each for ballet and weight training.
,
Infrastructure
requirements: Telephones.
Access
requirements: Would be adjacent to parking structure. Zamboni entrance necessary.
Response 171
Overview: Multi-purpose conference and performing arts center. The facility should be designed with
consideration of quality limited growth of the Vail area, multiple needs and increasing year round
business, helping to smooth the peaks and valleys of summer and winter. More stable year round
business will help employers and employees cope with instability.
Scope/Size: Preferred location at east end of parking structure. This would allow equal access of guests in Vail
and Lionshead. It would be convenient to those requiring automobile transportation as it would be
linked to the existing structure.
Financing by: Private-public partnership.
Infrastructure
requirements: In order to remain competitive in the resort and meetings community, top line (although not
ostentatious) latest technology must be utilized.
Access
requirements: Proposed location would utilize existing (improved as necessary) bus and pedestrian access.
Automobile access would have to be investigated.
Architectural/Site
studies: Community has previously completed studies and proposed plans to reference and perhaps improve
upon.
Response172
Ovei-view: The number of large buildings has reduced the desire to walk through the area because you can't see
the mountains or the ski hill from many of the walkways. We need to bring the outside green areas to
the mall area to present the idea of being in the mountains to the mall since you can not see the
mountains from the mall. Reduce concrete paths in size and add grass and gardens.
Scope/Size: Throughout Lionshead.
Financing by: Federal funding.
Objective
advanced: Increase pedestrian enjoyment, reduce concrete which is on walks and buildings. Paths will allow an
obvious traffic flow and provide more trees and green space to break up the straight lines of all the
buildings.
Primary/secondary
uses: Primary: visitors, com?nercial owners, renters and shoppers. Secondary: benches, small retail in
summer.
Square
footage: Entire area of concrete paths running from bus stop to the Marriott.
ti
P
Access
requirements: Ground needs to be altered for plantings.
Architectural/Site
studies: Should be done on computer to determine the type of trees and plantings based on size and height of
current buildings.
Response173
Overview: Building exteriors remodeled to follow theme (adobe?)
Scope/Size: Give each building free design accessibility by chosen design team - this will encourage building
owners to consider face lifting with consistent theme.
Financing by.• Use public funds - remodeling of buildings will increase tax revenue thus it will return the investment
over a few years.
Access
requirements: Review parking for each building and try to upgrade - many original buildings have no parking as
planning was poor in those days but if building still has open land around it make sure it is designated
only for parking.
1C ~ • ~~9~.~vci,Q~ P ~ ~ ~ • •
From preutous poge (SDD). The plan about to be the town. Vail Resorts is also in Vail. It will not be a
approued ignores eaery single listed as a supporter of the Bridge Street appearance,
AmtriaHmm standard of the underlying proposal. According to some our most successful element,
appy-OgJ~ ~UJd • zoning. The site is so over- of the individuals listed but more the massiveness in
P v built that, the landscaping is above, they were not told . Beaver Creek! Vail Resorts,
~ ori Town of Vail property. that the plan also states that the redevelopera of Lions-
"Show me the money" by The project also requires a substantial proFit would be head, are said to be over-
projecting additional sales that the town sell, lease or made under existing zoning joyed at the prospect of this
tax to the Town of Vail and impending approval.
approval for anything is
• I resent the rape of the fu_
within your grasp. Anyone ture of Vail for private gain
who cares about the iong- ~'~sent the=r~pe c~f ~h~ ~utu~e o~ ~TaiY fa'r
term future of Vail had bet ' by individuals whose only in-
~j ~32~y~t~ ~a1'1'~ I~~ 111t~Iy1(IU2.IS W~1QS~ Ejll~~ terest is money. The town
~ ter start paying close atten will be left with the problems
tion to what is being decided
in town offi,ces, and then re overdevelopment of this kind
ceiving a stamp of approval in producea. Others who will
- the council chambera. ' take advantage of this prece-
exchange property with the without a SDD. It appeara dent-setting decision are al-
The current plan for the applicant so that parts of the they were grossly misled and ready lining up, and Vail Re-
Sonnenalp Austria Haus building are not on town told redevelopment was not sorts is at the front of the
Special Development Dietrict property.and the roofa do not possible without a SDD. Ad- line.
is scheduled for final ap- overhang town property. ditional figurea lead to a pro- Call council members now
proual April 15, 1997. This According to the develop- jected profit well over $12 and be at the meeting this '
proposal ignores the re- er's plan, they discuesed the million dollars if the exieting coming Tuesday. The future
quirement that underlying plan with the "town attor- plan ie approved money to of Vail really is on the line.
zoning atandards be used to ney, manager, mayor and outside "investore." We can move forward with=
establish the requirements planning department" who The approval of thie project . out sacrificing "Vail." .
for guiding development in a.- said 5DD approval was likely will establieh the future Diana,Donovan •
Special. Development.t Dietnct due, to the many,, benefite, to., guidelines for redevelopment ~ . , Vail
~ ' k, ~,,cr • - a,r.
APR-12-97 10:04 PM ~ GINNY CULP * THE PRU 970 476 6499 P.01
April 12, 1997
~
V$al Towra Council ~I
76 South Frontago Road West °
Vail, CO 81657
Aear Sybal, Bob, Ketrin. Ludy, Pau1,Ailike, Rob,
Ws yota move forward iaz the coneaderation of the Austria Haus redevelopment, I urge you to stand by
the waluee of the people you a°epgesent arad the values that have made Vail a vvonderful place to live.
g kaiow tha9, the developer has made soane height concessions, moved the building north a bit and vvill
build more parking (wvith a subsidiza4;ion of land #'iom TOV...somehow I auspect that the exchange
will be very favorable for the Austz°aa Haus in order to expedite theu° proposal. is that in the best
intexests of Vail taxpayers?) However, I do not think these concessiona addreea the concerns of Vaa1
residents. The concerns include: use of SI)ID'e to break all the aulea; the interval awnership concept
being allowed for this building and twrelve othere; carrying capacity of the valley's resources and the
precendent being set by this building. Sometianes comprotnise fsn't possible. VVe, as citizens, and
ymu, ae Council, aY°e not obligated to "work it out" when the developer's request$ are too much.
Pleaee conaader the attached aspects of the Eluatria Haus redevelopment. I appxecaate your taking
the $iffie t,o lie9,ean.
Cordially,
GinquipwyL
, APR-12-97 10:04 PM ~ GINNY CULP -N THE PRU 970 476 6499 P.02
v B OLIU B wi 14 iwvi
!1 Hl'e I S9Jd:A OF RriDi`e LeOPMrJN1
g8ededelopment...vue a11 knvw that ehe redevelapIInent of VaillLionehead ia undeYway. I
believc all of us agree it is nceded. My opinion is that at is not the TOV and the Vail tax payere
vmeponaibality to make huge oonceasione in our vieion about what Vail is so that developers can
emake money, I,e4,'e be aealietic about what is needod vs. what is wanted by the developera. Do
rae wan4, eo see Vai?/i.ionahoad redeveloped to look liko Heaver Creek? Ien't open space, both
vieua? and physieal, important any anore? NIy convereatione with othexe in the valley indicate
that an uveP whelming number of thean vfalue the ambience of a mountain cotnmunity and do
not want a VElaikiki Beach-type eetting.
Yes, we do have guests c:ompl$aning about aooomrriodatione in Vail. I suspect that when wvc
charge the prices I see in lodging rate achedules, the guest expectatione rise dramatically.
Obviously those expectations are not being met. Many rental unite need updating and I euggest
thaf. 4,he Bncflividual property management eompanies can facilitate such through priority ren4al
rotataon far upgradec9 tanite. It's money that eeeaxis to get poople'e attention. Not having their
oondominium rerated as often because it w$Qn't in goad enough ahapo would be a real incentive
to upgradc for many ownera. And would provide eubetaratial rewards, tkit°ough increased
rentala, for thoee who did upgPade.
If the Sonnenalp charged a reaeonable amount of nightly rent for the Austria l-Iaus rooms, gueat
input would bc anore favoxablm. I guggeet that the free anarket (to which we all give lip eeavioe)
has rewardeci the Faeesflera appropriately for charging large pricee for emaA roome. Shouldn't
the reault bc loweP rates for Austria Fisue rooms,,,,admitting that they do not mesit the high
prices found in the Svnnenalp proper, the Hyatt, etc.? Inetcad, ewc, Vail residcnLe, are bcing
aaked ¢ci condone the tearing down of a 30 year old building to make way for a building thaC
caterK to tho high end gueat'e expectations. (And lgnores mAny o4' $he values of Vail reeidente,
both full-tienc arad aeoond homo ovvners.)
Aro there any? environmenp,al ethics iesueB about tearing down buildings juet becauae they don't
mect perc.eived present nceda? Do you ehinlc there are `Tail visitors who would like the small,
European ambience and ps°istae location of the Austria Haus at a reaeoneble price? Are you
thinking that 1lTp Q1VE vyanta to stay in a lodge like the Auetria Haue? Or, is it that the owner
of the peoperty finde that this lodge no longer fita in with has rrision for hia bueaness. (In a real
anarkct mconomy, tho emlution would be tha.t the owner eell it t,o eomeonc who woiild use their
creatavity and enthueiasan eo make it w,ork.) I think the present Auetria Haue is a rsonderful
lodgc with a welcoYning ambienoe. There are other buildinge in `Iail Vallage and Lionahead that
hAVe less ambience and, ixn xny arafnd, need radevelopment much more than this building, lf the
preAent owner wants to redevelop the building, % think that is fino. Iiowever, I don't thimk that
Vail residente nced to subsidize the redevelopment by allowing drastic variances froBn ehe
"villaqe" vieion. What is it Qo be...ouP vieian or the deveiopers vision? Please kec3p in mind that
Yow REPRES1%N'1' your oonatituents. Not juet the people who stand at the podium and prodict
doom and gdoom af thie pedevelopmont ae not allowed in iCe present form. (I persanally feol
trg+ing ta rnoeivatx by fear af wrhat well happera af you don't do eomethirig is an offeneive eelling
ety?c.)
, APR-12-97 10:05 PM ~IGINNY CULP mi, THE PRU 970 476 6499 P.03
0 Pwv J r~pnn eo-, ..,v, TI~E IS?S~ OF
SIZ1; Y? SPECYAL DEVELOPMENT I)ISTRICTS
Seze,..'d'ho architec$ esems proud of the fact that they have crarnmed eo tnuch Bnore square
foatage into thiA buildirag relative to tha aite. (Of couree, they've done away with eetbacke and
have exceeded the heighe restrictions... but they g4t a lot of square footage onto the aite aII
right.) I#s aRealtor, I ktaow thmt properties are often eold ae a"per equsre foot" price. So, every
extraa equare fooe they n add benefite them directly. Whereas every square foot they add
diminiehes a view for ueror takea avvqy apace along the creek or blocks out sunlight os creat,es
rnioati of m barrier or adds Qo oup infrastaucture probleine. Hugo buildinga create barriere. This
building blocke the view;of ilail Ah[ountain from eot118 of the entry areas to tho Village. Are we
tryirag #o dostroy a ecnso 'f ontsy in Vail... while trying to create ane in Lionshead?
SDI)....It seeme 1'ake the SDI) ie being uead all the time these daya. Ie mora tloxibility needed
now thun was needed i' the paet thirty-ive years? It is odioue to Yne that this project deeign
breakii av pnany z,oning lfwa. Why do ewe have zoning lawe? Xes, I understand that the SDI)
aIlovus flcxibility, but are there no limits7 Aa a citizen of Vail, vvhat etandarde vvill provade eoma
pPedictmbilfty for me? I~ I need to onme to evory ffieeting that involvcs a new project to eee
what farm that project is going to be allowed tn take by the preeent oouncil? Is that
"representative" govern nt? Hovv would you feol toward Vail if you vvere ono of the people who
reeently ded a redevelop en¢ and atuck close to the underlying zoning? A little cheatad? And
how would you feel ef yo weee thinking of redeveloping your building? "Entitled" to the same
atnount mf leniency? An how vvould you feel if you were a homeowner in Vail who had just
gone, unsuc;ceesfully, th ugh the procem of tryang to add 300 or 400 eq, f$. t,o thcir home?
With the Sllll atructure it aeeme like eeea°y project will be resolved acoording to the interesta
and tastes of a emall nuanbeP of people (staff, PEC, IDRB, Council). Will the xesult pleaee gnost of
your onnatatuente? 1 think uee of the SDD and allovaing so many variances will reault in more
11lh hour eontYiets wath oommunity members. Fiow is the public pautected from a pereuaeive,
nver-ze$lnuA deveYoper? the PEC, DRB and Council are not going to use those under-Iying
zonang rules, then throw ~thenn out. Ut everyone start from the new "Ynore flexible" base. Bue,
by Goci, you'd better have some pretty gaod, experienaed, well-educated, knowledgeable peoplo
in evergr pasi$ion vn thosg boarde. Itight now, some vf those boards are laughable given the kind
of iQsuca with which they are dealing in theee daye off redevelopment and bigger is better. I
bclieva that ie why our feature is really being directed by tnwn stgffars, not the boarde, not the
penple, not the councal, Too much reliance ora what someone else Yelle you.
I
fl once again churge the new oouncil rnerribers who were eo oppoeed to the Vail Commone prvject
to take ia rraIYy close laak at eahat you aPe doing here. It's the eame thing. You are tr$ding ofl'
all k,rade of variances anq requirementa to aomeone who offere to help wath a little infrastructure
and hati a pretty buildigg. Why does the Council think this help is an exactian? I believe
developmesnt necds to pay at's own way. Ae a tmx payeg, i don't want to pay foa the
infmatructure needed to aomaaxmodats moxe and more visitore to iTail. lWhen a developes gnakes
a Gokon offes to contribute to some in4'raetructaare, the past Council had thv habit of fa11ing all
1
,
~
, APR-12-97 10:06 PM ~ GINNY CULP * THE PRU 970 476 6499 P.04
4 AMI 1d, 1WJ/
over themHelvea (and their cone4.ituents values) to acxommodate the dQVOlopor. Each ofyqu eaid
that mdedcIopment oF the Village mnd I.ionshead wae a plank in your campaign platform. I
tbink you have grabbed at the Qaey way to do eome of 4hat, not realia.ing what you are giving
away in the meantime. Wil1 you vote for this though you knaw mast of the "regular" people of
4laal oppoae this kind o4' maesing izi Vail Village and I.ionehead? Isn't that what the laet Council
dici? How did you feel when tha$ happened? 'I'has as a precedenf,-setting decasion you are
maknng.
CAiItYIATG CAPAQI~
iVo ane eccans 4,o vvant to take a hard look at the caa°ryang capacity of the vaIl?ey. I think novv
fe the time $o do eo. Before vve start allowing major redevelopment that increases the density of
Vail. Fven if that increase ns oniy during oertain monthe o4' the year...we have to build (and pay
W) the balfraetruc$ure ¢o atapport that level of deaxeity.
Vlhat gwc ae tha4, rwe ss+E alrvady in a positaon vvhere vve are not keeping up with infrafitrttctuxe
demands ...parkeng, rnada, tmffic management, houeing €or employeee, etc. How do we think we
can do more? Oh yeii, the golden carrot, we'll have more eales tax dollare. Guess what...thoae
dollare are not providing for eehat eve need now. How are they going to provade for inore, a»d
more? I beUeve devefloprnent ahould pay its ovvn vvay, The Austria Haus ehould pmvide all of ats
mwn parking. %f they dont hawm enough land.... well, that'a a carrying capacity Iimatation for
thern, isn't it? VA hus lots of land where parking structures could be located.... let them build a
titructure, rnstead, we build the etraacturee with tax pqyer dollara anci then give it away free ta
heflp merchanta who knew thia wae a seaeonal reeort town whon they moved here. Merchanta
who haee not shawn the creatiwity and resouroefulness to aompete in a largcr playing field.
(ten'e thae sort of like giving g?our kid candy so he'u do his homework? Did we aek the rnerchantg
to do their hornework9) 7'he Town of ilaii is getting furthex and further behind. We are aobbing
one fund at' another to pay for the roundaboute in 1WOat Vail. Next year, we will be juggling
funde ag$in. And the g,ear agter that, againf Ien't thie analogous to how the typicaY, over-
ext.~nded consunacr bvea?
Ht soeme lilsc raow is the tiYxae to do a"reaourcee arsventoty" Y.o eee haw xnany people can "fit" into
the vallcy at any one tnane. And then respect those limita in our rueh to redevelapment. If we
don't rospect those laxreate, wdhat vbre are saying iti that the "new" guesdresidentg neede aPe more
important than the neede of ¢hose who are here now. If that ae the tack you, es a wuncil, take,
g'd eay you roally are noQ reproeenting your conetituents.
We arc a mounf,ain aommunity. We cannot provide eveay single tuxury, amonity and ecrvice to
eeery sing)e pereon vvho vvants to came heae. We have limitatione. Let's get real. Vail, artd
aomrraunities like it every where, are fimothering to death in their own euccese. It as ¢o our
benefi9, to srnain4ain our aaaabience. If we do that, pcople vvill alwaye vvant to come hcre. If we
appPOVe projeeta Iike the Augtria Haue, and set the preoedont, w+e gnuy be aw,aah in ca eoa of
developmen4, t}sat will dpetPOy what poople like about Vaal. Isn't it rwiser to prococd retionally
- APR-12-97 10:06 PM ~ GINNY CULP ~ THE PRU 970 476 6499 P.05
and elowly, rather than making theae prooedent setting decisions becauso the doveloper has a
Hchcdule? Maybe they should have started earlier rather than pushing tho council ta make a
decision so they can get out of the graund. %a the problem being placed on the wrang lap?
Yuus'ti?
I believe the decieion you are being asked to make hexe witl have many "ur?intended
conaequencea'°. Iam extreYnely daeappointed at the m&jvrity of the epunciTa strong
endorsementa for intervval ownership and for SDD's. I think thoBe endbrsements come
without much thought beang given to what Vail will "feel" like in five or ten yeare. Too many of
our decaeions over the paet ten years have been made for "money". We are on an increaaing
apiaa1. It raeeds to ba stopped somewhere. We should not kecp campromising our resources,
whoat we am: or why we lide heru so thatt merqhants, developera, hoteliers, etc, can make more
money. If big hotele can't make it here.... ataaybe we need to ooncentrate on iimaller lodgea.
gnetead we are being asked to change our values to accommadate bigger and bigger hotela (i.e.
moreb denaity tio at anakee eense eoonomically for them, wnvention facilitiee, rriose maeaing,
public epace on wihich to build....etc.). .4gain, the people vvho are asking fox thie subeuiiaation
and varignce knew thie was a resort community when they caane hea°e.
f
>
COLORADO
,
pz~l I'N T11TRA u L ~ OlJCE ]NEWS
lprr
NIINERALS & GEOLOGY. . .Oll & GAS. . .STATE PARKS. . .TRUST LANOS. . .WATER. . .WILDLIFE 4/97
DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL
RESOURCES
VIJATER
State approves new stream protection procedures. can[ community support wich no technical or legal obstacles.
On March 20, the Coloraiio Water Conservacion Board (CWCB) Alternatively, the process can provide more time in situations -
gave preliminary approval to a new set of procedures designed where we may encounter complex technical problems and/or
to increase public input into its process for appropriating water conflicts among different interest groups."
rights under its Instream F1ow and Natural Lake Level Program. T'hree phases are defined in the new procedures.
Under Colorado law, the board is responsible for appropri- During Phase I, the staff will work with all relevant state ating water rights on behalf of the state in streams and lakes to and federal agencies and other interested persons to identify the
protect to a reasonable degree watec-dependent natural environ- location for a potential filing and proposed methodologies to be
ments. Since the Instream F1ow Program began in 1973, the used to determine the amount of water to be appropriated. A
board has appropriated water rights covering over 7,900 stream work schedule will be developed and presented to the board ai a
miles and nearly 500 natural lakes. public meeting. Field data will also be collected and analyzed,
"The new procedures outline the specific steps the boazd and an instream flow recommendation will be developed.
will take before an application for water rights is filed. lfiis During Phase II the boazd staff will review and process the
assures that both proponents and opponents of any proposed recommendations formulated in Phase I. This will include con-
water rights application have an opportunity to provide input sultation with Division of Water Resources' (DWR) division
into the process of determining whether and how we file," said engineers and water commissioners and with CWCB board
Instream FTow Program Director Dan Memman. members on water availability issues and development of a noti-
"We also built in some flexibility that will allow the process fication list tailored to the streams in question.
to move forward more quickly in cases where there is signifi- continued, page 8
~ WILDLIFE 1_
DOW to use new procedure to test hatcheries for several popular Colorado rivers, including che upper Colorado,
whirling disease. A new, more sensitive testing procedure Gunnison and South Platte.
will be used to determine whether Colorado hatcheries are The parasite attacks the nervous system and cartilage of
infected with the parasite that can cause whirIing disease. The young fish. Aduit rainbows can be infected but aren't harmed
new technique, developed at the Division of Wildlife's (DOW) by the parasite. Other species, including brown trout and koka-
Fish Health Laboratory in Brush, will help biologists in their nee salmon, may carry the spore, but their reproductive success
efforts to protect native trout populations from being infected is not affected. The parasite does not affect humans, other
with the whirling disease spore. mammals or other species of fish.
The DOW will continue to use the established testing Commissioners made four recommendations that the DOW .
method to determine the actual number of spores in infected fish will follow as part of its aquatic management program:
in hatcheries infected with the parasite. That number is impor- 1. The new testing method will be used to deternune whether
tant because hatcheries that are lightly infected-with each fish hatcheries aze infected with the whirling disease parasite.
containing fewer than 10,000 spores on average-are used to No fish may be stocked into any lake or stream negative
stock selected lakes and streams that have been previously for the parasite until the new test has been performed.
stocked with positive fish or have tested positive for the para- 2. The established testing method will be used to determine
site. These include popular lakes, reservoirs and streams where the average number oF spores in infected hatcheries.
stocked fish provide most of the fishin; recrea[iort. Hatcheries averagino fewer than 10,000 spores per fish
Whirling disease is caused by a parasitic infection that will continue to be considered "lighdy infected" as speci-
strikes some species of trout and salmon. Rainbow trout are one f-ied in DOW regulations. These fish may be stocked into
of the most susceptible species, and the DOW considers the par- selected lakes and streams that have been previously
asite a key factor in the disappearance of young rainbows from
continued, page 3
COLORADO DNR MEETINGS ETCa
DEPARTIVIENT OF
NATLIRAL ][ZESOURCES APRIL
1313 Sherman, Rm. 718 1 Board of Examiners Water Well Constructfon & Pump Installatlon
Denver, CO 80203 303/866-3311 Contractors meeting (DWR)
4 Colorado Geological Survey Advisory Committee meeting
Executive Director: 4-5 Greater Prairie Chicken viewing trip, Wray (Info: 9701332-5063)
Jim Lochhead
Deputy Director: 5-6 Basic ProJect Learning Tree and ProJect WILD for Earth Day work-
Ron Cattany " shop, Pine Cliff Ranch, Sedalia. ($15; 1 credit wailable from CSM)
(Info: Denise Rucks, 3031841-7128) ~
DMSION OF MINERAIS BL GEOI.OGY 9 Great Outdoors Colorado Board meeting (Info: 3031863-7522) .
(DMG) 10-11 Wildlife Commission workshop, Forf Collins
1Vlike Long, Director 11-12 Greater prairie chlcken viewing tdp, Wray (info: 9701332-5063)
303/866-3567 16 Land-use & mining workshop for local govemments, Colorado
Cowxnno GEOLOCic,u. SvxvEY Springs (DMG) (Story, p. 4)
(CGS) 17 State Land Board workshop
Vicki Cowart, 18 Stote Lond Board meeting
State Geologist 18-19 Greater prairie chicken viewing trip, Wray (Info: 9701332-5063)
303/866-2611 21_22 Oil & Gas Conservation Commission hearing
COLORADO OIL RG GAS CONSERVA7ION 22-24 Mined Land Reclamation Board meeting (DMG)
Commnssiorv (COGCC) 28 National Petroleum Exposition (Story, p. 4)
Rich Griebling, Director
, 303/894-2100 AY
COLORADO STATE PARKS 1-2 widlife Commission meeting, Lamar
Laurie Mathews, Director 3 Basic PLT workshop, Denver. ($15; 1/2 credit ovallable through CS(v)
303866-3437 (lnfo: Shawna Crocker, 3031871-2515)
COLORADO SOIL CONSERVATION 7-9 Westem Mine Safety Instructors Semfnar, Denver (Story, p. 4)
Bonxn (CSC.B) 8 Geological.Hazards and Engineering Practices.in Westem Colorado
Dan Parker, Director conference, Montrose (Story, p. 5)
303/866-3351 12 Coal Mine Examiners Board rulemaking hearfng (DMG) (Story, p. 4)
STATE LAND BOARD (SLB) 12-13 Colorado Water Conservation Board meeting, Pueblo
Tom Swanson, President 12 Stote Land Board workshop
Max Vezzan;, Director 13 State Land Board meeting
303/866-3454 14 Angler Round Tabie, Montrose (Info: contact DOM COLORADO WATER CONSERVAT[ON 15-17 Northwestern Coal Producers meeting, Steamboat Springs (DMG)
Bonnn (CWCB) 16 Ground Water Commission meeting (DWR)
Chuck Lile, Director
303/866-3441 State Parks Board meeting, Steamboat Springs
19-20 Oii & Gas Conservation Commission hearing
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES ~DWK~ 21_22 Mined Land Reclamation Board meeting, La Junta (DMG)
Hal Simpson, Director
303/866-3581 26 Memorial Day holiday-Siate offices closed
COLORADO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE JUNE
(CDOW)
John Mumma, Director 3 Board of Examiners Water Well Construction and Pump Instailatfon
303/297-1192 Contractors meeting (DWR)
b Colorado Geological Survey Advisory Committee meeting
Published by ti:e DNR 9-10 Soil Conservation Board meeting
Office of Communicarions. 10 Great Outdoors Colorado Board meeting (Info: 3031863-7522)
Director: Kathy Kanda 12-13 Wildlife Commission workshop, Alamosa
Ediror: Kare Jones 16-18 Acid Mine Drainage Symposium, Durango (Story, p. 4)
Drstrrbulion: Cathy Diaz 16 State Land Board workshop, Pueblo
Natural Resource News is 17 State Lond Board meeting,Pueblo
published 10 times a year; it is not 25-26 Mined Land Reclamation Board meeting
published in August or December. 30 Oil & Gas Conservation Commission hearing
To be placed on (or removed from)
the newsletter's distribution lis4 qM acfivilies take place in Denver unless othenvise noted. For informaHon on events,
call Cathy Diaz, 3031866-2607. call the number psted or appropriate DIVR division. (See phone numbers al IaIP.)
2
: WILDLIFE ~
WiIdlife Commission to consider ban on contests. At well as by members of the general public.
its May 1-2 meeting in Lamar, the Colorado Wildlife Species from moose to river otters have been reintroduced.
Commission will give final consideration to a draft regulation Others, including the state's famous rainbow and brown trout,
that would prohibit contest killing of any small game species for have been introduced to fill available biological niches,
which no bag or possession limits exisL In fact, Colorado is one of the few states having enough
• The commission directed the DOW [o prepare the draft reg- success managing wildlife to remove or consider removing
' ulation prohibiting killing contests after conservation groups species from its threatened and endangered lists. The status of ~
expressed concerns about contests that award prizes to whomev- white pelicans, peregrine falcons, bald and golden eagles,
. er ldlls the most animals. A recently concluded coyote killing greater sandhill cranes, greater prairie chicken, greenback cut-
contest in western Colorado prompted [he concerns. throat trout and several other species has improved in recent
Commissioners have also asked the Attorney General's years thanks to DOW's efforts.
Office to determine whether the commission has the authority to Those efforts to manage wildlife have been made at no cost
regulate contests involving killing of small game. A state law to state taxpayers. The division is funded primarily through the
• approved by the legislature bans contests involving big game, sale of hunting and fishing licenses, which in 1996 totalled more
but no such law is in place banning small game killing contests. than $SS million. The remainder of the DOW's $72 million
DOW celebrates 100-year anniversary. On April 16, annual operating budget comes from a federal excise tax on the
1897, the Colorado legislature and Govemor Alva Adams creat- manufacture of hunting and fshing equipment ($8 million);
ed the Department of Forestry, Game and Fish, making Great Outdoors Colorado funds ($2 million); other sources,
Colorado only the fourth state in the nation to establish a conser- including earned interest ($7 million); and taxpayer donations to
vation agency-the ancestor of today's Division of Wildlife. the non-game income tax checkoff (about $400,000).
In 1911, the U.S. Forest Service estimated Colorado's deer The partnership between wildlife and the peaple who enjoy
herd at 8,110; in 1918, the state's antelope population was it has made wildlife a big business in the state. Hunting and
reported to be less than 1,000. Similarly, the state's elk popula- fishing genetate $1.7 billion/year for the Colorado economy.
aon was estimated at 500 to 1,000 in 1910. Today, 960 species Those who watch or photograph wildlife, feed birds etc. add
of wildIife reside here, and CoIorado's elk herd, estimated to be another $1 bIllion•every year, making wildlife-related recreation
200,000 animals, is the largest in North America. Deer number roughly equivalent to the state's ski industry in terms of its con-
almost 600,000, and there about 60,000 antelope in the state. tribution to Colorado's economy.
Those numbers are the result of hunting seasons, bag limits The DOW will celebrate iu centennial throughout 1997
and the application of principles of wildlife management that With a variety of activities-from hosting open houses at the
have been suppoRed by the state's sportsmen and women, as state's wildlife areas and fish hatcheries to sponsoring historical
interpretive presentations in school classrooms.
UVhirling disease (continued from page 1) spore will be factored into the discussion, along with infor-
stocked or where the parasite already exists. The 10,000- mation about the new refined testing tecfuiique. The new
spore limit was set [wo years ago. The goal was to ensure policy and regulations will be in place while the DOW
that fish stocked into these waters pose an acceptably low works to rid facilities of the parasite.
risk to wild fish populations. Tests have found that spore W}ule many popular waters will continue to be stocked,
Ioads in many wild fsh average 100,000 or more per fish. hundreds more wiIl receive few if any fish again this year.
3. The DOW will ask the legislature for authority to spend Nearly all high-coun[ry waters, especially on the Western Slope,
more than $10 million to rid hatcheries of the whiriing dis- have not been infected. Only fish from hatcheries that have
ease parasite. The money would come from the DOW been confirmed parasite-free will be stocked into these waters.
Witdiife Cash Fund, not from the General Fund. If funding The new testing technique confirmed earlier this month -
is approved by the legislature, the division would be able that the DOW's Pitkin and Durango hatcheries are now infected
to eliminate the pazasite from many of these rearing facili- with the spore. That leaves five of DOW's cold-water hatch-
ties and hatchery buildings within three to five years. eries negative for the whirling disease parasite, drastically limit-
4. This fali, the connmission wili begin a formaI process to ing the number of fish available for most high-country and
consider new stocking policy and regulations in time for Western Slope locations.
che 1998 stocking season. New research now under way in Through a trade arrangement with a federal hatchery near
Colorado and elsewhere and even more sensitive tech- Hotchkiss, the DOW wi11 have an addiponal 1 million small
?iques using DNA testing to detect the whiding disease rainbows for the Western Slope. Another 105,000 catchable-
size trout will be purchased from private growecs.
3
OiL & GAs ~
COGCC votes on financial surety rules. On March 7 the processing and storage facilities. Financial assurance in the
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) amount of $5,000 will be required for small systems that gather
completed the rulemaking process that sets new financial surety less than 5 million cubic feet of gas a day.
rules for oil and gas operations. COGCC and BLflh to host Nptionol Petroleum
The new tules are designed to ensure wells will be properly Exposition. Beginning April 28 the COGCC and the BLM
plugged and abandoned and that well locations will be will host a meeting in Denver among state officials, federal
reclaimed. They change the bonding requirements for oil and officials, oil and gas industry representatives and environmen-
gas operators from a blanket $30,000 bond covering all wells talists. Participants will discuss changes in the BLM's fluid .
drilled by a single operator in the state to a"risk-based" mineral program as wel] as other policy issues. Technical pre-
approach that mandates a$30,000 blanket bond for up to 100 sentations will also be given by the BI.M, the COGCC and.the
wells, and a$100,000 blanket bond if an operator has more than Colorado Geological Survey. A new award will be presented to
100 wells. the COGCC's Outstanding Oil and Gas Operator.
The COGCC will also require a bond of $5,000 for each T'he exposition is free and open to the public.
inactive well beyond those covered by a company's blanket Anyone who would like to make a technical presentation or
bond. Under the new rules, operators still have the option of has a question about the exhibition should contact Brian Macke
securing bonds of $5,000 for individual wells. The proposed at 303/894-2100 (ext. 122).
rules aiso require financial assurance in the amount of $25,000
for all seismic operations, and $50,000 for all gas gathering,
MIiVERALS 8c GEOLOGY ~
Cocai mining heaith and safe#y rule meetings sef. The Resources, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Natural
Division of Minerals & Geology and the Coal Mine Boazd of Resource Conservation Service.
Examiners (CMBE) have scheduled a formal public hearing for For more information, contact Loretta Pineda or Maxine
promulgation of coal mine heal[h and safety rules for l. p.m., Stewart, 303L866,3567_
May 12, 1313 Sherman St., Rm. 215, in Denver. DMG to host pcid mine drainage symposium. On June
Public meetings on the rules have been conducted in 16, 17 and 18 the Division of Minerals & Geology will co-spon-
Trinidad, Craig and Del[a, and a"strawman process" with sor an Acid Mine Drainage Symposium at the Purgatory Village
industry and interested persons has been completed. Written Hotel in Durango.
comments are due by 5 p.m. April 25. The program will discuss identifying and impiementing
For more information, or to purchase copies of [he rules, methods that can be used to improve water quality at abandoned
call Maxine Stewart, DMG, 303/866-4640. and inactive mine sites. Other topics include: site characteriza-
FIr54 1997 land-use workshop sCheduled. The Division tion of problems; hydrologic controls; and passive and active.
of Minerals & Geology and the Colorado Mined Land treatment of water quality problems. Participants will also take
Reclamation Board are sponsoring a workshop for local govern- a field trip to the Upper Animas River. Speakers include: Dr.
ments to discuss land-use and mining issues along the Front Andrew Robertson, Robertson GeoConsultants; James Gusek,
Range. The workshop is scheduled for April 16 at the Embassy Knight Piesold; and Jim Henon, from the DMG.
Suites Hotel, 7290 Commerce Center Dr., Colorado Springs, The conference fee is $35. For more informacion, contact beginning at 9 a.m. Anne Clift, DMG, 303/866-4097; FAX: 303/832-8106; or E-
County and municipal officials and employees who deal mail: clift@bend.madriver.com.
with land-use and environmental issues in Douglas, Eibert, El Other sponsors include the Environmental Protection
Paso, Jefferson, Pueblo and Tellercounties have been invited to Agency Region VIII, the Colorado DeparUnent of Health and
attend. Local mine operators are also encouraged to take part. the Animas River Stakeholders Group.
The purpose of the workshop is co provide informacion to yyestem mine safety instrucfors seminar schedufed.
county and municipa] officials on the DMG's functions in the 'rhe Colorado Mine Safety and Training Program is sponsoring
areas of permitting of mine operations and development of min- a Western Mine Safety Instructors Seminar May 7-9, at the
eral resources. DMG staff will also help counties review their
Embassy Suites Hotel in Denver. This seminar will provide
own gravel operations. instructors with information about innovative training techniques
Participants in the workshop include reclamation and tech-
and the latest safety regulations. Cost is $75.
nical specialists from the DMG, the Colorado Geological To learn more, call Loretta Pineda, 303/866-3567.
Survey, the State Engineer's OfficelDivision of Water
~
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
CGS sponsors geo hazqrd conference. The Colorado A new book by the Colorado Geological Survey is written
Geological Survey is sponsoring a conference, Geologic Hazards for homebuyers who are considering buying a home buil[ on
and Engineering Practices in Western Colorado, on May 8 in swelling soils and for homeowners who live on swelling soils.
Mon[rose. This conference is for engineers, geologisu, plan- Although risks from swelling soils cannot be completely
ners, builders and others who use, design and build structures in eliminated, they can be significantly reduced through proper site
western Colorado's complex geologic settings. investigation, design, construction, landscaping and maintenance
The conference will be held at the Montrose Pavilion, 1800 practices. The book's purpose is to assist Cotoradans in reducing
Pavilion Dr. (East Niagara), from 8 a.m to 5 p.m. damage caused by these soils. It also is designed to satisfy
One focus of the conference wili be to examine how identi- Colorado's disclosure law for new homes built on swelling soils,
fied geologic hazards are managed by local planners. Following which requires that homebuyers in swelling-soil areas be noti-
this theme, there will be a talk on the consequences in land fied of the condition by builders, developers and other sellers.
development of not adequately considering geologic-hazard con- The 76-page book, "A Guide to Swelling Soils foc Colorado
ditions. Conference session topics inciude landslides, avalanch- Homebuyers and Homeowners" (Special Publication 43), is
es, debris flows, hydrocompactive soils and radioactive waste illustrated with 45 drawings and photos and describes the geoIo-
remediation. Case studies will discuss techniques to remediate gy of swelling soils; the role of subsurface moisture in gmund •
building problems in geologic-hazard areas in westem Colorado. swelling; construction, landscaping and home maintenance on
On Friday, May 9, a field trip wiIl be conducted to sites in swelling soils; the effect of swelling soils on homeowner risk;
Montrose, Ouray, Ridgway and Telluride where active or poten- and how to check a property for swelling soils. It also contains
tial geologic hazards can be viewed. a list of helpful sources of geologic, landscaping and soIl
The conference registra6on fee, which inciudes lunch, is improvement, building and real estate information.
$75. Cost to attend both the conference and the field trip is Swelling soils contain clay minerals that expand in volume
$115. Registration forms and additional information are avail- when they get wet and shrink as they dry. The pressures devel-
able from the'Colorado Geological Survey, 303/866-2611. oped by shrinking and swelling may be strong enough to crack
or even buckle foundations and floors, roads and driveways, and
CGS issues updated swelling soils publication. utility lines. They aze a significant problem in the Southwest, •
Swelling soils are a cosdy geologic hazard in many parts of and particularly in Colorado because of our dry climate.
Colorado. They cause millions of dollars in darnage to homes, Copies of the publication can be purchased for $7 each over
roads and infras[ructures, which can lead to litigation and higher the counter at the CGS, 1313 Sherman St, Rm. 715, Denver,
warranty insurance rates. The cost of repairing damage, which Colo 80203; phone 303/866-3340, FAX 303/866-2461, or e-
can range fmm cracks in walls and doors that won't close to mail: orletta.fairchild@state.co.us. Orders placed via e-mail,
foundation failure, often ends up being shouldered direcdy by phone or FAX require an additional $3.50 each for shipping and
individual homeowners: handling. VISAO and Master Card@ are accepted. Bullc pur-
chase discounts are available.
STATE PARKS IA
Sfate Parks adds Heinricy property. In Febnuary, the with the Greeley-Loveland and Seven Lakes irrigation compa-
State of Colorado closed the purchase of 30 acres of land just nies for the property.
south of Boyd Lake State Park near Loveland. This land, "The purchase could not have taken place without the
known as the Heinricy property, will be managed by Colorado tremendous cooperaaon and partnership of several agencies,
State Parks and will be an extension of the park. The acquisi- groups and private citizens. Monetary and volunteer help came
tion will protect critical park buffer land, as well as significant - from.[he City of Loveland, the Larimer Land Trust, Colorado
habitat for wa[erfowl and other wildlife. State Parks, the Greeley-Loveland Irrigation Company, the
"The property wilt also provide an important link to the Seven Lakes Irrigation Company, the Loveland Wildlife
City of Loveland's park and trail system and will be used as an Association, the Larimer County Open Lands Program and pri-
outdoor environmental education learning area," said Doug Will, vate citizens," added Will. "A grant of $100,000 from Great
Boyd Lake park managec. Outdoors Colorado was the key to making this $405,000 addi-
Since 1987, State Pazks has managed this property for area tion to Boyd Lake a reality."
irrigation companies as a buffer to Boyd Lake's campground, Boyd Lake State Park is located one mile east of Loveland.
open-space, fishing access and a link to a park within the city. Pazk admission is $4 per day or $40 for an annual pass good
In 1994, Parks entered into a three-year lease-option agreement until Dec. 31, 1997.
~
DEPARTMEiVT INITIATIVES L GREAT OUTDOORS COLORAD0
FAI
Endangered species proposal lends urgency to efforts GOCO awards pianning grants. On Feb. 26 the Great
4o recover rare mouse. The U.S. Fish & Wildiife Service's Outdoors Colorado Board awarded more than $854,000 in ptan- "(iJSFWS) proposal to list the Preble's meadow jumping mouse ning grants to communities across the state.
as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act under- Sponsors have formed partnerships with public agencies,
scores the urgency of moving forward with efforts to protect the non-profit groups, the private sector and votunteers. The result is
rare rodent and its habitat, according to officials from the that GOCO's $854,000 will be leveraged by more than $1 mi1=
Department of Natural Resources and its Division of Wildlife. lion in sponsor and partner contributions.
"We anticipated the proposed listing of the Preble's mouse, Among the projects awarded grants are:
which is why we launched an effort late last yeaz with the U.S. 0 Westerly Creek Corridor Revitalization, sponsored by the
Fish & Wildlife Service, several Front Range counties and pri- City of Aurora (Adams, Arapahoe and Denver counties).
vate Iandowners to deveIop a pIan to recover the species. The GOCO grant: $55,000,000/total project cost: $120,000. •
proposed listing will not deter our efforts, but intensify them," Aurora, Denver, the Lowry Redevelopment Authority and
said DNR Executive Director Jim Lochhead. the Stapleton Development Corp. will complete a plan for a
The Preble's meadow jumping mouse inhabits wet mead- recreational trail along Westerly Creek that will connect the,
ows and riparian areas below 7,400 feet along the eastern edge Highline Canal Trail and Sand Creek Greenway, as well as
of Colorado's Front Range and similaz habitats in southeast revitalization of the stream corridor.
Wyoming. Surveys conducted over the past five years found 0 Northern Colorado Community Separcrtor Planning
small populations of the species in Colorado's El Paso, Douglas, Project, sponsored by the City of Greeley. GOCO granG
Boulder and Jefferson counties and in Albany and Laramie $35,000/total project cost: $61,500. Growth in northem counties in Wyoming. No Preble's mouse were found in some CoIorado is gready exceeding the statewide average, and the
historically occupied sites in Colorado. demand for land to develop continues to grow. Planning for
The goal of the Preble's mouse parmership planning effort protection of open lands between communities now will pre-
is to protect the mouse and its habitat through voIuntary cooper- serve the sense of community and the quality of life.
ative agreements with landowners and local govemments before 0 Delta County Agricullural Conservation Action Plan, spon-
the USFWS makes its final decision on the stacus of the species. sored by Delta County. GOCO grant: $75,000/tocal project
Through aggressive conservation activities, CoIorado suc- cost: $123,580. Deita County will complete a comprehen-
ceeded in preventing the need to federally list the boreal toad sive, cooperative master plan for conservacion of the coun-
and swift fox. Although populations of these species are small ty's most critical agricultural and natural resource lands.
enough to warrant tisting under the Endangered Species Act, the Since 1990, population has increased nearly 20 percent, and
USFWS has determined that federal regulation of these species agricultural lands are threatened by new development.
is not necessary because the state and other partners are taking o Pikes Peak Master Plan, sponsored by the Ciry of Colorado
adequate steps to protect and recover them. Springs. GOCO grant: $60,000/total project cost:
The Preble's mouse presents a greater challenge because its $253,895. This planning effort will determine how Pikes
remaining habitat lies near urbanized areas that are under signifi- Peak should be managed to optimize natural resources, land .
cant residential and industrial deveIopment pressure. use and recreational use while protecting the environmenG
"'The Department of Natural Resources has demonstrated its (D Glade Park Conservation Planning Project, sponsored by
commitment to addressing the needs of Colorado's sensitive and the Mesa Counry Land Conservancy. GOCO grant:
declining native wiIdlife species. The 1995 memorandum of $29,230/total projec[ cost: $58,300. Participating encities
agreement between Govemor Roy Romer and U.S. Department will develop conservation strategies for the 900-square-mile
of Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt acknowledges this commit- area adjacent to the Colorado National Monument. Plans
ment and, more importantly, acknowledjes that a proactive witl be developed through the recendy formed Glade Park
approach to protecting declining species is a less cosdy alterna- Working Groop, whicli inciudes ranchers and other
tive to the adversarial approach that has characterized some landowners, public agencies and conservation groups.
endangered species issues eIsewhere," said Lochhead. reat Outdoors Colorado Icas also asked four projects-the
He added that he is pleased with the progress being made to Colorado Wetlar:ds L:itiative, Sand Creek Corridor, Heart
develop a program to protect the Preble's mouse. "We are of the Rockies Trail Corridor and Gunnison Ranchland
working closely with the Fish and Wildiife Service to bring al[ Conservatioi: Project-to submit applications for the final
relevant players to the table. A tremendous amoun[ of work round of Legacy Project grants. The board lias $9.6 million
needs to be done in the coming year. Neither the state nor feder- QyQilable for Legacy Projects-tlie last that will be funded until
aI agencies can do it alone without active participation by county the Lottery, GOCO's source of revenue, is reauthorized 6y the
officials, private landowners, industry and conservation groups." legislature to continue beyond 1999.
6
BOARDS ~ ~~~~ISSIORIS
Coal iVline Board members nominated. Edgar Bolton, Govemor Roy Romer on March 7 and forwarded them to the
Gary Carroll, Eugene Catillo and James Hake have been nomi- full Senate for approval. The terms of the members will expire
nated to serve on the Coal Mine Board of Examiners of the on June 30, 2000.
Division of Minerals & Geology. They are awaiting approval CyyC6 members nominafed. On March 14 Governor
by the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee. Romer nominated Walter Burr of Waldeo, Elizabeth Rieke of .
If approved, their terms would expire on July 1, 2000. Boulder and Ray Werner of Delta to serve on the Colorado
The Coal Mine Board of Examiners is responsibie for the Water Conservation Board. If approved by the Senate, their
examination, craining and certification of mine foreman, fire tercns would expire on Feb. 12, 2000. ~ bosses, shotfirers, blasters and electricians in coal mines.
~ Groundwater Commission members nominafed. The
COGCC commissioners approved by Senate com- nominaaons of Michael Gross, JoAnn Thomas and Dennis
mItfee. The nominations of Allan Heinie, Claudia Rebne and Coryell to the Groundwater Commission (Division of Water
Logan MacMillian to the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Resources) have been forwarded to the Senate Agriculture and
Commission were approved by the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee. The terms of the commission-
Natural Resources Committee on Feb. 20. Approval by the ers are set to expire May 1, 2000.
full Senate is expected. All three will be serving as commis-
sioners for the second time. The terms of Heinle and IMildlife Commission re-elects chair. On March 13 the
MacMillian expire July 1, 1999. Rebne's term expires July 1, eight-member Colorado Wildlife Commission re-elected
2000 Arnold Salazar to his third consecutive term as commission
chairman. Rebecca Frank of Grand Junction will again serve
Sfate PaPks Board appointees dpproved. The appoint- as vice-chairwoman and Mark LeValley of Hotchkiss will
ments of John Singletary, Robin Hernreich and Howard serve as Commission Secretary. Salazar, 42, of Alamosa, was
Kenison to the Scate Parks Boazd have moved a step closer to aPpointed to the Commission in 1992 by Governor Romer.
Senate confirmation. The Senate Agriculture and Natural
Resources Committee approved the appointments made by
~ PUBtICATIOiVS & PROJECTS
The Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) and the Division of SCB. It provides information on various types of irrigation
NYinerals &c Geology have begun a program called the systems and outlines ways for farmers to improve [heir bottom I
Colorado Mineral Education Project. Its aim is to provide edu- line by saving energy and water.
cational materials on minerals and mining to middle-school Incentive Water Quality Programs Impact the Lower
and high-school teachers-including materials that have been Arkansas River is published by the West Otero Soil
tailor-made for Colorado. These materials, which include Conserva[ion District. It outlines efforts by the district and
videos, posters, computer training games, booklets and kits, are many other federal and state agencies beginning in 1990 to use
intended to provide students with a realistic picture of the innovations ranging from irrigation ditch lining to surge irriga-
importance of minerals in our daily lives. tion to lower salinity on that stretch of the Arkansas.
For more information, contact Jim Cappa at the CGS, For copies of any of these publications, contact the SCB, .
1313 Sherman St., Rm. 715, Denver, Colo. 80203; 303/866- 1313 Sherman St., Rm. 219, Denver, Colo. 80203.
2611. The Division of Wildlife's 1996 annual report is available.
T'he Colorado Soil Conservation Board (SCB) has the fol- In 1996 the DOW opened 32-nearly 92,000 acres-of sta[e
lowing publications available: 1)•7'he Colorado Reader trust tand properties for wiIdiife-related recreation, bringing the
[Agriculture in the Classroom], 2) Efficient Irrigation; and total of SLB properties open to hunting, fishing and other
3) Incentive Water Quality Programs Impacr the Lower wildlife-related recreational activities to 167-almost 372,000
Arkansar River. acres. The DOW also set aside six state wildlife areas totaling
The Colorado Reader is published by the Colorado 4,000 acres for the youth men[or program in hopes of encour-
Agriculture Foundation for use in the classroom. It contains aging participation in wildlife-related recreation.
articles on the make-up of soil and the the basics of soil con- These are just some of the highlights contained in the
servation-as well as activities for students to complete. DOW's 1996 annual repoR. The repoR is available at all
Efficient Irrigation is published by Energy Conservation DOW offices or can be obtained by from the DOW Public
for Colorado Agriculture program, which is overseen by the Affairs Unit, 6060 Broadway, Denver, Colo. 80216.
, 7
VVATER
Instream flow (confinued irom page 1) In the motion giving preliminary approval to the new proce-
Phase III begins once the staff prepares its summary dures, the board acknow]edged that some provisions will requ'ue
repocts, which will include specific recommendations on pro- changes to the Instream F7ow Program rules via a formal rule-
posed flow amounts. The summary reports will be presented to making process. The board instructed the staff to present at its
the board at a public meeting, and complete copies of the staff s May meeting draft rules to reconcile such differences between
files will be availabie for public review at all public board meet- the new procedures and existing rules.
ings and at the CWCB office in Denver until final action is Daring the interim, the board asked that the staff immedi-
taken. If the board directs the staff to publicly notice its intent ately begin using the procedures to resume work on several pro-
to appropriate water rights based on the recommendations pro- Posed appropriations that tHe board initially considered at its _
posed in the summary reports, the"public will have at least 120 July 1996 meeting. These proposed appropriations have been on
days to submit comments before the board takes final action. hold pending development of the new process that provides .
In Phase III, the staff will also take steps to publicize the clearer guidelines and greater opportunity for public input
proposed appropriation. These include distributing copies of "Many of our eazly filings were in high mountain headwa-
summary reports to DWR division engineers' offices for public [ers areas and often on public lands," Merriman said. "The
review, requesting notices be posted at courthouses in affected methodology for determining the amount of water and [he avail-
councies and providing oppor[unities for public comment at all ability of water were relatively easy. We are now faced with the
board meetings on pending instream flow recommendations. challenge of balancing environmental concerns with human con-
"We have also included the opportunity for the public to ~~as where the scientific, legai and political issues aze
provide information to the board, question the staff about its rec- much more complex. These new procedures are designed to ~
omiriendadons and question one another in circumstances where a11ow the public to help us find solutions by actively participat-
the additional information or questions will materially assist the in8 in the process of identifying stream reaches, providing tech-
board in making its final decision on whether to approve, reject, nical information and contribucing to the public debate."
modify or table a recommendation," Merriman said. -
Colorado Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman, Room 718 COLDRAM ~tA V~_-
Denver, CO 80203 OFFICIAL MA1L 4 U.S.P~j~A,^n~
~~~6~gs3~ ~'Q~ APR-9197 ~=~;$I - o .5 5
_,<<
340100000 ° ? I~ ~
P.B.ME:EH Ia•
PRIVATE USE co~
68141R5
~ TOWN OF VAIL XC'C~7fli+~C(.L
' ATPN: •MAYOit
~ • 75 S FRINTAGE RD • VAIL CO 81657 -
, .
~/i~
q {m
Printed on recycted paper
e
_ ,-~~Gu:~~~b:~~S: t~:K~`~'•. .
. . . . ' ' . ~ . • . , ~ " ~ f ' i:3 1 t i f . . .
. . . . , . ~ . ~ ~t
'
• , . . . ~ • , t > ~k^„`'y p• ~j ~ , .a,~"~. '
Y~ ~
~ Colorado
~j;'?"c .
. ~ .
111unicipal L,eague
'»ti,~<;
~ l . . ~ . ~ ~ ' .~~~Z~ ~.=Y}M,!'R - `;.',s a"r"j
~ . r~ j.i ~~V; ~.s.~,. • ~s~
~ ~ • G~.r~::;:;,: r':~ w 's ~
. 75th Annual
- ~Co.fn erence
. -
, . - o j : i:~•~' ~ ' ~~1$,7 `~uk
. . ' - . . ~ ~ ' F•' ";,3'Y,^.. , _ ~ ~ ~j
Ane 24=28 1,997 ~
. . . , . . . , f• 44F ~ ir~~ . . . ,~.1~.
. , ~ . < ys% •
, . ass I~illake
- . " ~ .~fy<a.s~ ~~d4--=,i~~sF.:n,:;,af~j.
. . . .•r . _ _ r:aj.,'' >
~ ' , . . ' . . . . . . • r , ~3'.^~ " _ '
. . , / . •~f`'
~iOlO CldQ
. , . . , , , , . . . . . , j^ ~ -it~. ~ 1S. y t. , • ~ ,
' . . . , . . . . , . . . ' : ~Y~;~ i"G"«~'<;~": ; p",r. ~ . ; d' ~ .
, . ~ " F - ' , . ^ ~ • - 'fo.•:'.`.~r~~ r•~'A~yr}+.. s:;'~.~'~=~a~..
. . . , . . . _ ~ ' , • • . . . _ 7'-" :i <~:.:::a'i.:.,~~ , ~~i ;
. , _ . , :w:=,:,:~~~.{- ..'u:~~: d•~;.i~_.-~,. .S:
. • - ~ ~ ~ :~ll;:'. -+~..,~~3'S;, •y$
. . . , n . . ~ . _ . ' . . ~ i: r' ~ . l.,°, :i •r~ ~ .
x
\
. . . _ i,~>~~.~•^,Y.... 'i.S~:;`.Y.'~v'Y..
r • ~
~ .
. . r . . ' . . - ,
' . . , , ~ . . , . ~ , . :~~yy : ~/5' e~.°..:a.~^.:r~•';:,t~u'
. 3 , . , . - . , . _ . . ~_~.~~f,~~: ;.,:_'~S~iY~ysn~'~.
. , . . , . ' ~„''e'~-~` c.~`F-*i..j. -'Y v:,,g,4 ~
,~Q`,,:CR'~,.~ipj.c^,c,qxa'V``2~„`
>~'4Z"3iEJ.~t'~ • _?~1.~32 k[;•,~,
' . ~ . c ' ' , ' . ` .,f,~Y' ' Gu"':.~;~+'• • , ~ ~
. . . , . , . . ` g' . .,c•. x'~.k~ "'~,":.~~v.,=:~y.. ~r,'.'
'h t`.~,
, . ~ . . . . . , . `>3 . : ~"T .i:• S~? :=ii . %i. ~ ~ ~ ~:~~~y°.r;e~w
. . _ . . . . , , , _ ew, i s,.„ ~,`.,,"^,..'~`~•,q{,.~?~a~ ,
. . . . ~ - • . . . , ~ L T,;: k~''a`.`
. . . _ ' . . ~•»~~:~'e~'r~~",, ».t-:h~~.~~:S4R~'.;...'v'.µi.,<
. . ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~.:~i - ~•~~•t~:•',~'~~^f•"
. . . . . _ . . .u Nr.~y'r'y•.,~,' ~e0
" , ' _ , . . . . . , ~ ~ • . J ~ 5
' , • . . . ~ ' . 3' . . ' . . ~ .:t '~-r A ~ ot:,:j„X~=f.r%~.~~:ty '
. . .~,..a z
• ; - " S',:c , e ~ .
~ ~ . ~ ~ _ , ~ . _ . ri.~',.~t•;t~~~ "
. „ , , _ . r - - ' :n i. a
~ . . ' , • . . ~ . - i.$.;~iT;~lB.~
, , ' ~/y~~~( T'/,/'/+ ~ ' ~ ,f ' y . . . '=ti: j 4 t~~5'~~ . • . ~ ~
/
e , . ' ~1/' ~VV/ WWV. . , . :M r~ ~ x s~::,~(;~F~ ~ _
, . =a s~>' ~ ± ~if ~F~ ~
' . . . . , . . ' ' , l./V~GGJ' ~ ~nl/WV (/ff'G~f /UJ' • , - ^ i-'~ i4' F'>o::: 3
. . ~ ' ~r .s~..
. . . . . "r' ~ _ . ; . .
Elected Officials Training Certificate Program
participants.)
~i °I~ • Speakers: Patricia Nelson Limerick, professor of
history, Universiry of Colorado, Boulder, and
8•30 a.tlt. Aspen Golf Course co-chair, Center for the American 6Yest; Peter A.
~ Harkness, editor, GOVERNING magazine
GOLF TOURNAMENT
~ For comPlete tournament information, see a e
P P g IVoon to 1 p.m.
r 12A. The regisuation focm for the golf tourna-
. ment is on page 9A. Please return the complet- II1fOY'mai BOX LlflY1Ch
ed form and fees to CML by June 6. The tour- Meet and network with other municipal officials
nament, underwritten by CH2M HiIUOMI, and League board members. Advance registra-
Ag~~~< Coors, and William M. Mercer, Inc., is limited tion required-Lunch charge: $13.
, to registered conference participants and their
spouses. Golf prizes, sponsored by CIRSA, 1•15 to 2•30 .m.
will be presented at the CML annual business . p
. r ti'I
meecing. eetix~g of Minds, Part g][
Join Patricia Limerick and Peter Harkness as
Peter Harkness has been editor they continue the dialogue from the opening
and publisher of GOVERNING, 3 to 6 p.m. Conference Center general session in a more informal setting.
a magazine for leaders of state REGISTRATION Questions and comments from the audience will
and local governments, since it be welcomed. (1.25 credits for Elected Officials
was founded almost nine years Training Certificate Program participants.)
ago. Before that, he was execu-
tive editor and depasty publisher
1:15 to 2:30 p.m.
of Congressional Quarterly, a
Washington information compa Renewables for 1Vlunicipalitaes:
-
ny known for patblishing what is News You Can IJse
regarded as the independent and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Conference Center ge a hero to Your constituents. Save on the cost
unofficial "bible" on the U.S. REGISTRATION of running electric power lines, prepare to meet
Congress and federal govern- the challenges of restructuring in the electric
industry, and help protect the environment at the
ment. Harkness has watche~ 8 to 9 d.m. same time. (1.25 credits for Elected Officials
government at all [evels, from Trainin Certificate Pro am anici ants.
I~lominating Corraanittee Breakfast g ~ P P )
Washington to the States;: eities, Speakers: John Thornton, National Renewable
and counties, for 25 years rHe is Energy Laborarory; Ron Lehr, former PUC
a recipient of the RaymO 1 8:15 to 9 a.m. ~ commissioner and current Denver Water Board
Clapper Award,f,or;investig 'tt,ve Cor~erence lEvaluation commissioner; Marc Roper, Governor's Office
reporting, awarded by the~,W{iite Comrraittee IlReetirng of Energy Conservation
House Correspondents ;
'Assoc~ation and';cs a fellaw~o,~ 1:15 to 2:30 p.m.
9 to 9:30 a.m.
~ theNtionalAcrarlemy:ofPubtic 5ma11 Communities ~Administratron~,one of the. fewi ~ew Attendees Infornaatioan
journalists to°lie. First-time CML conference attendees are invited Craeker-barrel Session
:zndueted into' #
its membershtp to this session to learn how the conference is This informal session will enable elected offi-
organized, what to expect, and how to take full cials and staffs from smaller communities to
advantage of the various programs, as well as to visit informally, ask questions, and exchange
learn more about the Lea ideas on a breadth of issues affecting small
gue.
Z eities and towus. (1.25 credits for Elected
Officials Training Certificate Pro;ram partici-
` 9:45 to 11:30 a.m.
pants.)
OPENIIVG GENERAL SESSION :
A 1Vgeeting of the Minds.
Colorado's Past and the
Clnaflenges Ahead i
This provocative opening session will feature ;
' two exciting speakers who will challenge the
thinking of municipal leaders about where cities
and towns have been and where they are likely
to be as we enter the 21st century. (2 credits for •
~
~E__ Colorado Municipalities March-April 1997
0 ° 0
•
A
" 2:45 to 3:45 p.m. 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Conference Center
Preservirng the lPast, Erahaaacang REGISTRATION
• the lFuture AND EXHIBIT TABLES
Come join the experts as they discuss historic
preservation techniques that work for cities and
. towns. (1 credit for Elected Officials Training $ to 11:45 a.m.
~ „
Certificate Program participants.) Spiral Dynamics: IViastering
Speakers: Jeff Johnston, mayor, Fraser; Barb `Ia111eS9 ~.eadership, and Change
~ Pahl, regional manager, National Trust for
, Historic Preservation; Mark Wolf, projects man- Examine the forces shaping values, leadership
ager, Colorado Historical Sociery ~d education styles, and transformational
change. Learn how govemment officials can
better understand their citizens and. their actions.
2:45 to 3:45 P.m. Session sponsored by the Municipal Clerks and
Transportatioan Strategies for the WIMG sections. (3.5 credits for Elected
. NeX$ CentlIlry Officials Training Certificate Program partici-
pan[s.) '
How can Colorado meet the demands to pre- Speaker: Chris Cowan, National Values Center, Patricia Nelson Limerick is a
?4 serve the existing infrastructure and to improve Inc. professor of historv at the
mobility? Panelists will discuss the state and
local financial outlook and showcase a regional University of Colorado at
strategy to address the complex and costly 9 to 10:15 a.m. Boulder and co-chair of the
issues of providing an adequate transportation SMALL COMMUlVITIES Center of the American West. A
system. (1 credit for Elected Officials Training current MacAnhur Fellow, she
Certificate Program participants.) Developixag 3uccessful Volurateer continues to provide insight and
Speakers: Bill Vidal, ezecutive director, lPrograms perspective on the American
Colorado Department of Transportation (imit- Volunteers are an indispensable resource for any West and the people who live
ed); Kathleen Gilliland, councillor, Loveland, municipality, but they don't come cheap. So there through numerous books,
and member, North Front Range MPO how can small towns already strapped for staff essays, and presentatiorts.
resources, time, and funding develop useful vol- Among°her credits, she served
' 4 to 5 p.m. unteer programs? Join panelists t&,discuss basic
as advisor to "The West," an
pnnciples for designing successful volunteer
l~'~eet tlae B0a~'(~ aIlIlC~ l~oaE'Qll eight-part PBS series by Ken
programs and highlight ways to~get cuizens
Candidates involved with community issues. (i25 eredits Burnsq(Stephen ives, and
Members of the present CML Executive Board for Elected Officials Training CertifiEate '~=~Geoffre~',. -,Ward„,,as state coordi-
~ R--,.._...
will be introduced, and candidates for the CML Program participants. '
) ~ natorfor-~~ado-Histo~ZJ!a.~,
Executive Board will be introduced and asked to Speakers:Treva Edwards, mayor, LoveliurdDeb from 1,984-87; as consultant to ~r
say a few words conceming their candidacy. Gillespie, volunteer coordinator, Lov ..ni3 t~t"e~_"rec~~COlo adp'1 tn"
Anna Lenahan, administrator, Berthou We -sr"5exkibit a -,nd as a rnemb8 -
6 to 7 p.m. Conference Center ~ ~ of the b~d~o ed:rors fo~r..the-
9 to 10:15 a.m. ~Aencan HitoncaliRe~iew,
- WELCOMING RECEPTION ~ or -1 i~
She -isMcurrenllyAar: ~vorkAo~o
. Socialize with conference attendees at this Water' Where IS publ.i'-
~..dY catron~s; £Somettnng`i~the ~
. reception hosted by CML and the conference's tIle COY31dYbOI1 ~aY'O~HflIItfl?
~ Soil=.a.coliectron-of,•essays, and
gold, silver, and bronze sponsors. Front Range and West Slope commumtie liave
-s The~°Atorru'c"West..~~. x
been disagreeing for years about diversio~ of~,
N~, q water across the Continental Divide to serve the'^-~,~
Front Range. Is there anY hoPe for resolving ~tiis
conflict? Are there aspects of this discussion on
which participants might discover agreement?
. 7 to 8:15 a.m. And what are the remaining obstacles to better
SK Fulv Rutv/Wat.x E~t'West Slope cooperation on this difficult
issue? Representatives of both sides of the
Join a group of hardy enthusiasts as they enjoy debate will discuss their views. (1.25 credits for
an invigorating Snowmass moming. Elected Officials Training Certificate Program
Preregistered entrants will receive a T-shirt at participants.)
the conference. For complete information, see Speakers: State Rep. Russell George, R-Rifle;
page 12A. T'he run is underwritten by Piper Hamlet J. "Chips" Barry, manager, Demer
Jaffray, with raffle prizes donated by RtJN- Board of Water Commissioners; Eric Kuhn, gen-
NER'S WORLD. Fastest times will be era[ manager, Colorado River Water
announced and raffle prizes drawn at the CML Conservation District
' Business Meeting.
March-April 1997 Colorado Municipalities 3A
. •
k, A~~. 9 to 11:30 a.m. Noon to 1:45 p.m.
Short Shots
AwaxDs LurrcHEoN 9 to 9:30 Department of Local Affairs:
An Overview of New State-MuniciPal Relations:
.
'Developments. Larry Views from the GoveY-noa~
Kallenberger, director, Gov. Roy Romer (tentative) will discuss his
Department of Local Affairs views on state-municipal issues. The audience
xv 930 to 10 Managing Colorado's Future: will have an opportunity to ask questions and
comment. In addition, the winners of the CML
A Guidebook for Integrating
Land Use, TransPortation, and MuniciPal Achievement Awards will receive
Air Quality Planning Programs their honors, and certificates and pins for the
Barbara Cole, president, Elected Officials Training Certificate Program
Communiry Maners, Inc. will be awarded. Advance registration
10 to 10:30 Cellular Telephone required-Lunch charge: $20.
Technology's Impact on Your
Community. Rick Sullivan, 2 t0 4:30 P.m.
Roy Romer was elected gover- government relations manager, What's Happening in
nor in 1986 and re-elected in AT&T Wireless
1990 and 1994. He previously 10:30 to 11 CAMU discussion of the Fort ~he ~a~Y of Aspen?
served as state treasurer, Collins Wind Power Pilot Join municipal officials for an informative series
Program. Steve [~andermeer, of sessions on and tours of some of Aspen's
1977-87; chief of staff to the most promising projecu and innovative accom-
governor, 1975-77 and director of marketing and
energy services, Fort Collins Plishments. Sessions bejin with parking and
1982-83; in the state Senate, transportation, followed by affordable housing,
1962-66; and in the state House 11 to 11:30 Affordable Housing historic preservation and downtown planning,
of Representatives, 1958-62. OPportunities for and open space, parks, and trails. Guided tours
Romer is a past chair of the Municipalities. Colorado will be available on eacb topic immediately fol- ~
National Governors Association. Housing Finance Aushoriry lowing the Q&A period. Round-trip transporta- ~He is now head of the tion will be provided from the Snowmass
Democratic National Committee 10:30 to 11:45 a.m. Conference Center. (1.5 credits for Elected ~
and is a past chair of the f4 SMALL COMMUM'ITES Offcials Training Certificate Program partici-
Democratic Governors ~ pants.) Advance reo stration required-no
~ Safe D~-inkang Water Act-Innpact chazge.
Association. In 1990-91;_:he was
oan SaraalB Systems
the first chair of the Nanonal'?"
Educational Goals Panel~and Passed in 1996, the Safe Drinking Water Act has 2 to 4 p.m.
- P ! some key provisions that will impact small com-
developed the frstvnanoriat edtc-
{7~ljiag IS the ~aOVeY'Y101''S
~p~ munities. This session will provide an overview
cattona[ report ca"rd of the SDWA, identify funding sources, and ~ommission on I+lational and
highlight new requirements and rewlations. C0111111Uri1~' SeI'VjCe:~
r''..r`'".-~- r?"C^ . ~ ~ . a
(1.25 credits for Elected Officials Training An overview of the municipal implications of
Certificate Program participants.) the Commission on Nadonal and Community
Speakers: Jerry Biberstine, chief, Drinking Service, followed by discussions on the results
Water Section, Water Qua[ity Control Division, of the Listening Campaign, community service #
Colorado Department of Public Health and and welfaze reform, and Americorp/grants/litera-
r~~.~.,m ~
f:= ~
~ Environment; Mary Fabisiak, Mountain Water cy. Session sponsored by the Parks and
Consulting; Herman Wooten, program special- Recreation Directors section.
ist, Colorado Rural Water Association Speakers: Gregory J. Geissler, executive direc-
~
tor, and Jackie Norris, chair, Governor's
10:30 to 11 •45 a.m. Commission on National and Community
Service
]Emerging Issiaes
~
A review of developing issues that are of munio- 2 to 4 P.m.
ipal concern. Topics to be announced. (1.25
credits for Elected Officials Training Certificate CML Annual Business Ndeetarng
Program participants.) Conference delegates wil1 elect Executive Board
members, adopt the League's 1997-98 Policy
Statement, and consider other League business.
Susan Thornton, CML president, will provide an
annual report on CML activities, and Don Jones,
NLC director of inember programs, will report
on key federal issues and NLC-state league
Colorado Municipalities
~ March-April 1997
'L
{ ".CM1 AMMAt"! C-b"
NFE
•
JUNE RENCE e
4
t
relations. Delegates must be present ro vote; no 8 to 11:30 d.m.
_ proxy voting will be allowed.
Hunnan Itesources--Becornang a
2 to 4 p.m. 5trategic Partner vvith
Colorado IVYunicipal C9erks Management
Topics include the importance of strategic plan-
Associataon Busaness Meeting ning for human resources managers, examina-
tion of the "current state," development of
• 2:30 to 4 p.m. strategies, re-engineering the human resources
function, and assessment of the human resources , De-icing Applications and flte9ated manager's organizational role. Session spon-
~ Impacts tm WaQCY' QIIal1t3' sored by CPPA and the Personnel Directors
. T'his presentation will focus on water quality as Section. Includes continental breakfast. Advance
it relates to various de-icing applications, registration required-Breakfast chazge: $5.
including an evaluation of the effects of magne- Speakers: John Walsh and Don Heilman, vice
sium chloride. Included will be an analysis of presidents, Segal Co.
- the problems relating to off-site water contami-
nation. Session sponsored by the Public Works 9 to 11 •45 d.m.
section. '
Speaker: Dr. Wlliam Lewis, Western ~~$~~'Y ~aWS am~ PraC~1C@
Environmenta[Analysis This presentation will deal with the nature and
function of the notary office under Colorado law.
4 to 6 p.m. Notarial powers, duties, responsibilities, and lia-
bilities will be discussed. Attendees will also be
COlOIl'ad0 ASSOC1atlOH1 0f Sk1 encouraged to present specific notary questions,
Towns Meetang problems, and issues for discussion. Session
sponsored by the Municipal Clerks section.
Speaker: Johanna Bi![myer, administrative offt-
~ ]p,¢~ cer, licensing, state of Colorado.
16~y'3
"@ a • 'y 4a
MI 9 to 11:30 a.m.
Maanecipal T'elecorn 3ervises
8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Conference Center Come learn the ins and outs of the~fast paced
REGISTRATION world of municipal telecommnnict~oi`t~'s.,SgsS'pn
sponsored by the Colorado A~socia op of"
AND EXHIBIT TABLES Municipal Utilities.
Speakers. Leona Stoecker, mayori ~ragru•
7'45 to 9 a.m. Jeff Gould, electric director Longmont qe
•
. Wlson, attorney, Anderson Dude~'Ptp
WOYI'be11 1IIl ~[1HIIliC1~Da1 ~SOVeH Ffl%HfleHIlI~ Lebel; Ed Maninez, telecominuncca r o attag- "
J- (WIMG) Breakfast Meetiang er, Colorado Springs UtilitieA
~ Advance registration required-Breakfast i '
' ~ j
. charge: $12. 9 to 11:30 a.m.
~
lProcurement Cards i
8 to 9 a.m. . - ,
Join this session on procurement cards ('eredit
Plannnng Offieaals Breakfast aand cards) and their expanding use by government
Busaness Meeting organizations. Learn about implementation of4" ~
- •procurement card system and issues such as '
The planning officials will hold a breakfast and
- business meeting. Sponsored by Kodak control systems, management reports, and pur-
' Colorado Division and Leland Consulting. chasing efficiencies. Session sponsored by the
Advance registration required-Breakfast Rocky Mountain Governmental Purchasing
charge: $2.50. Association and the Purchasing Agents section.
9 to 10:15 a.m.
Oh Howw Times Have Changed ffor
Mumicipafl Goverrnance?
• Following the League's 75th conference theme,
this panel will take a look back at-and a peek
toward-the future of municipal governance.
March-April 1997 Colorado Municipalities
CA
~~?'ll~!~1'~~'~~I!~~~1',lli~?i~~l~ 1e,1'1=~'~:~/'t•
Seasoned veterans and relative newcomers will 2 to 3:30 p.m.
share their views on developing new leadership, Save Public $-Aggregate Natural
restoring the public trust, and the power strug-
gles associated with the job. Session sponsored Gas Purchase ,
by the Mayors and Councilmembers and Mana- Session sponsored by the Colorado Association
gers sections. (1.25 credits for Elected Officials of Municipal Utilities.
Training Certificate Program participants.) Speakers: Ruth Borchardt, contracts coordina-
Speakers: Bill Christopher, manager, tor, Longmonr, John Bleem, division manager,
Westminster; Ted Grenda, mayor, Snowmass Energy Services, Platte River Power Authority;
Yllage; Don Jones, NLC director of inember Kevin Gaden, director of key accounts, NMPP
programs; Chuck Reid, manager, Fraser Energy
9 to 11:45 a.m. 2 to 3:30 p.m.
1VIUNICIPAL ATTORNEYS Achieving the I,ong-term Vision
GENERAL SESSION of the Cocnmunity Through
Program and speakers to be announced. Sh0Y't-term Plannnng Decisions
Sessions sponsored by the Municipal Attomeys This session will review the relationship
section. between the long-term "vision" and the short-
term "actions" by decision-makers, and address
10•30 to 11'•45 a.m. Why it is important to regularly assess this rela-
' tionship and recognize when adjustment is need-
M[unicipalities and 3chools: A ed, whether to the plan, the implementation
]Partnership that VVorks methods, or both. Session sponsored by the
Come join [he panel of municipal officials as Planning Officials section. (1.5 credits for
- they examine ways in which municipalities and Elected Officials Training Certificate Program
schools are collaborating for better communi- Participants.)
ties. Session sponsored by the Managers and the Speakers: Anne Tankersley, princrpal, Leland
Mayors and Councilmembers sections. (1.25 Consulting Group; Glen Gidley, planning and
credits for Elected Officials Training Certificate development director, Wheat Ridge; Carl
Program participants.) Cerveny, chair, Planning Officials section
Speakers: Bill Behrens, mayor, Broomfield;
Janet Terry, councilmember, Grand Junction; 2 t0 3 P.m.
A~
We[lington Webb, mayor, Demer (invited) Electecl Officials ancl Staff
1
4
IDecision-making: VVhere Il)o You
s Noon to 1:45 p.m. :
Draw the lLine?
MIEYflYClpal A$$OI'Ide3'S LllriCh This session will provide a discussion of some
Program and speakers to be announced. of the do's and don'ts of decision-making and
~ ~ Advance registration required-Lunch charge:
day-to-day operations in municipalities.
$13
,,_..,~m ~ Panelists will talk about the need for elected
officials and appointed officials to respect each
Noon to 1:45 p.m. other's roles. Session sponsored by the Mayors
and Councilmembers and Managers sections. (1
Managers lLuncln
credit for Elected Officials Training Certificate
~ t~ Advance registration required-Lunch charge:
~ Program participants.) '
1_1~~~~~-r~:~ $13. Speakers: Martin [/anacour, ciry manager,
l'~., „'4.•.~y~L~F` ~~1.~.
Glendale, Ariz.; Kathleen Novak, councilmem-
NOOn t0 1:45 p.m. ber, Northglenn
IVIAYORS AND COUNCILMEMBERS
I.LJNCH 2 to 5 p.m.
MUl~IICIPAL ATTORNEYS
"]Politacs gs a Funny Busixeess"
Chuck Henning will provide his views on the GENERAL SESSION
people and issues that make up the state Program and speakers to be announced.
Legislature, as well as a few humorous quotes Sessions sponsored by the Municipal Attomeys
from politicians around the country. Advance section.
registration requued-Lunch chazge: $13.
Speaker: Chuck Henning, GOP communications
director, Colorada House of Representatives
~n
Colorado Municipalities March-April 1997
~Llt'?I~!Isls'-II!ILiLUUEKH?'[N loJA~'4~?'~3
~
3:15 to 4:15 p.m. 8:30 a.m. to noon
lPublic Faces, Private lL'aves HI: Issues Management
Coping With lLafe in ghe ]Paablic Back by popular demand with a new program
E3,e tailored for municipal officials, join nationally
This session will be a continuation of the dia- respected communications consultant Bob
Aronson for a look at how to identify, address,
logue that has been created among elected offi- and diffuse potentially volatile issues before
cials, managers, and their families on what they become a tlashpoin[ in your community.
, efforts can be made ro be more supportive of the •
personal diffculties that are faced by everyone Advance registration required-Workshop
charge: $50, includes continental breakfast. (3.5 '
working in leadership positions in the public credits for Elected Officials Trainin- Certificate 4~ -
~ arena. Session sponsored by the Mayors and program participants.)
Councilmembers and Managers sections. (1
• Speaker: Bob Aronson, The Aronson Partnership ;tF~" ~
credit for Elected Officials Training Certificate ~
Program participants.)
- 9 a.m. to noon :o
3:15 to 4:15 p.m. MIJNICIPAL ATTORNEYS
"New LTrbanism"• ~ere Did It GENERAL SESSION Bob Aronson is the founder and
• f executive officer of the
~a0, ailil WIly IS I$ BaCk`? Program and speakers to be announced. chie Aronson Partnership. The 10-
What exactly is "New Urbanism," and will it Sessions sponsored by the Municipal A[torneys
work in your community? There are many ques- section. year-old company specializes in
strategic communications, con-
tions, doubts, and possibilities surrounding this
old approach to designing new, human-scale sulting, planning, and coaching.
developments..Join this panel of expert practi- Nationally recogni<,ed for his
tioners to take a practical look at a cunent pro- , expeKise, Aronson's 30-year
ject in the works and discuss why planners, career is wide ranging. He has
developers, and citizens are revisiting this old served as the comrnunications
. friend of urban design. Session sponsored by the M1 director for the governor of
. Mayors and Councilmembers section. (1 credit Minnesota, managed communi-
for Elected Officials Training Certificate FRIDAY, JUNE 27 cations for a state liniversity,
Program participants.) and has years of e.rperience as a
Speakers: Gordon Brown; principal, Space 9 a.m. to 3:30 P.m. working journalist. As a consul-
~ Analytics; Brad Schol, planning director,
~
Longmont; Kiki Wallace, Prospect New Glenwoocl SpringsExcursaon: Hot ranr, he has successfully led
Urbanism Project Springs Pool and gYotel CoYorado clients through crises ranging
Come along for a daylong trip down the .fi'om medical and environmental
ff, prodacct tamper-
6 to 9 p.m. Roaring Fork Valley to Glenwood Springs for issues to layo
relaxation at the world-famous Hot Springs pool ing, and,c'ongressionaUregulato-
SPECIAL EVENT and lunch and a guided tour of the'historic ry agency investigations.
A TaS$e Og SYIOW%HIlaSS Hotel Colorado. Buses will leave Snowmass
T Conference attendees and their families and Village at 9 a.m. for the 45-aunute dnv ' e down
. ~
guests are invited to have "A Taste of to Glenwood Springs. First stop will be the-Ho~t~'~-~~~ ~
r z
. Snowmass" on the mall. Snowmass restaurants Springs pool, where you can relax and"enjoy the
soothing baths. Then it is off to the~HofeC" ~
will offer a variety of delightful entrees and
Colorado for a 1230 buffet lunch followed-b ~'-`"ffi ~J
desserts for your pleasure. Watch for details in
.
the CML Newsletter. Advance registration re- ~ hour-long tour of the hotel s haunringjhistory«.---
~ ~J
quired-Event charge: $25 adults, $10 children Ghost stories are just part of the excrtement!
' r
under 11. Board the buses at 230 p.m for the remrn
• and be back in Snowmass V llage in plenryof' f~i4 :
time for the big Friday night event. Advance< S•~
tZ?~"
registration required-Event charge: $1 ff adults,
$12 children under 12. Q
;u , q _"~:~a•-
~
.z_,:..~._
8:30 to 9 a.m.
Munaeipal Agtorraeys
Continentafl Breakfast
Sponsored by Vranesh and Raisch.
March-April 1997 Colorado Municipalities 7A
t
~ Conference Regi
stration
~~~ERENCE FEES
May 24 is the cut-off date for hotel
Received
N rooms. Please note the cancellation policy by after
s~ ~R
under hotel information. 6/6 6/6
.
June 6 is the cut-off date for early confer-
~ ~ ~
ence registration. No refunds made after Ful? Itegistratiora
this date.
Municipal0fficials $140 $220
~~~STRATION Associate Members $140 $220
~ORMATgON Nonmembers, commercial
Every delegate, guest, speaker, and any representatives $230 $300
other participant must register using the
registration form. NOTE: No registra- Orie-DaY-OIlly F''ee
B]E SURE TOo tion will be accepted by telephone or Municipal Officials
processed without payment. Only $ 95 $140
« COITlPlete yOlll' COll- The full registration fee includes admis- (Specify day on registration form)
ference registration sion to the opening general session, all
workshops (except Saturday's "Issues Meal T1CketS
form (along with Management"), business meetings, and Wed. Box Lunch $13
yOUT gOlf tOUri11- social hours. Workshop handouts and cof-
ment and Fun fee breaks are also included. Thurs. Awards Luncheon $20
The one-day-only fee includes the above Friday Event (adult) $25
RUT1~WaIlC 1'eg1Stl'a- functions only for the day registered. Friday Event (under 11 years) $10
tion forms). Meal functions, sidelight programs, golf, planners Breal~ast (Fri)* $2.50
Fun Run/Walk, and the Issues
Enclose a check Management session are additional costs. WIMG Breakfast (Fri) $12
payable to C1VIL CPPA Breakfast (Fri)** $s
PAYMENT
with your registra- y
Your check made payable to CML must Attome s Lunch (Fri) $13
tion forms. accompany your conference, golf, and fun Managers Lunch (Fri) $13
run/walk registration forms. Elected OfFicials Lunch (Fri) $13
0- IVOte the ea1'ly Teg- Your credit cazd authorization or check *Underwritten by Kodak Colorado Division
~V istration cut-off for one night made pavable to Snowmass and Leland Consulting
..ex Resort Association must accompany your
date is Friday, **Cos[ underwritten by CPPA
hotel reservation form. Send your hotel
June 6, 1997. reservation form to Snowmass Itesort Nflscellaneous
Association, P O. Box 5566, Snowmass Village, CO 81615. Issues Management $50
Golf Tournament $60
~ ~~NFERENCE Fun Run/Walk $11 $14
- CANClEL]LATgONS Sidelights: Glenwood Tour
Only written conference cancellations will Adult $18
be accepted. Refunds will be made if can- Under 12 years $12
cellations are received by CML on or
before June 6 and will be subject to a$25 Aspen Tour No charge, but
per person handling charge. No refunds ticket required
will be made after June 6. No refunds for
no-shows. Cancellations or changes in the
~ number of ineal tickets will be honored
through June 6. Unused meal tickets are -
~ not refundable.
~
~
~ 8A Colorado Municipalities March-April 1997
~
~
CM,L ANNUAL / R
ENCE
24 .
' ConferenCe RegIlStratfloIlll ~or1 l+lumber Cost
_ (complete a separate form for each registrant) FuR RegistratiOn Fee $
One-Day Fee
(Mun. Officials Only) $
Name Indicate Day: ? Wednesday O Thursday O Friday
Title Special Events
1. Golf ($60) $
- Municipality/Firm 2. Fun Run/Walk ($11/$14) $
~ 3. Aspen 'I'our (no chazge) $
; Address
, 4. Issues Management ($50) $
, Meal Tickets
5. Wed. Box Lunch ($13) $
) City, State ZIP 6. Thurs. Awards Luncheon ($20) $
Phone ( ) 7. Friday Event (adult, $25) $
8. Friday Event (under 11, $10) $
Spouse's name (if attending) 9. Pianners Breakfast ($2.50) $
~r 10. WIMG Breakfast ($12) $
: ? Check if this is your first CML conference. 11. CPPA Breakfast ($5) $
Send this completed form with check payable to Colorado 12. Attorneys Lunch ($13) $
Municipal League, 1660 Lincoln St., Suite 2100, Denver, CO 13. Managers Lunch ($13) $
80264. No registration will be processed without payment in 14. Elect. Officials Lunch ($13) $
full. Remember to send your hotel deposit check or credit card 15. Sidelights (adult, $18) $
authorization and your hotel reservation request to Snowmass 16. Sidelights (under 12, $12) $
Resort Association (see hotel reservation form on p. 11 A).
Total Amount Enclosed $
Golf TouY`rnament Player 1 Player 3
Registration ]E'orrn Name: Name:
Complete this form and send it with the
conference registration form (please Represents: Represents:
mark appropriate line for gol fl to the
CML address above. Golf fee is $60 per phone: Phone:
person. Golf registration forms will not
be processed for a listed player unless .
the player is registered for the confer- ~~ayer 2 Player 4
ence and the golf fee is paid. Forms Name; Name:
must be received by June 6; forms
listing fewer than four players will be Represents: Represents:
' matched with other players. Preference
' given to full conference registrants. phone: Phone:
For complete information, see p. 12A.
5K ]Fun Run/Waflk Name: T-shirt size (they run small)
Registrataom Fog-m
Complete this form and mazk the appro- Organization: ? Small
priate line for the Fun Run/Walk on the ? Medium
conference registration form. Send in
completed form and payment ($11 if Phone: ? Large
registered by June 6; $14 thereafter)
along with conference registration Address: ? Extra large
forms to CML address above.
For complete information, see p. 12A.
March-April 1997 Colorado Municipalities 9A
~ l ~ ' 0 I
ibodg'lno-gr ln'ormation
Ciflt-off date for lodging Municipalities can arrange for master
Y'eSeY'VatiOYLS 1S May 24! billing from individual hotels by writ-
4ten request at least 30 days in
tf" Reservations must be made on the advance. All rates are exclusive of tax.
form rovided (see form on Page
P No-shows or cancellations made less
11A) and must be sent to Snowmass
than 14 days prior to arrival will _
~ A-~°". Resort Association. DO NOT SEND result in forfeiture of deposit. YOUR RESERVATION FORMS TO
~ CNIL Note on state sales tax exemptions: To qualify
for sales taY exemptions, the payment must be
t~
2 Lodging will be assi made to the seller by warrant or check drawn
gned on a first-
come, first-served basis. A Separate on governmental funds. Anyone presenting a
fOITn must be COm leted for each unit sales tax exemption must be paying for the items
P by the organization's check or purchase order.
~TEW THNS YEARo required. Please indicate your first No personal checks or cash will be allowed.
1~ through seventh choices on the form. Sales Tax Regularion 26-102.22 srares rhar
whenever a vendor or buyer disagree as to
(ag' A CheCk PaylUle t0 All reservations must be guaranteed whether a given sale is tax-exempt, the vendor is
for the first night by advance deposit ro collect and the buyer is to pay the tax. The
SIIOWri1aSS ReS01t 3or credit card. If you make your vendor shall give the buyer a receipt to show the
ASSOClatlOri OI' CI'ed- deposit by check, make the check tax was paid. The 6tryer may then apply to the
state Deparhnent of Revenue for a refund.
it card authorization payable to Snowmass Resort NOTE: A 4% Civic Assessment Fee is not tax-
Association. exempt and will be added to the total lodging
must be mailed to charge. ,
Snowmass Resort
Association.
o*- Note the cut-off date for reserving
lodging is Saturday, _ . . _ ' 4.'
1VIay 24, 1997.
. : ~ . ~ ` ~
Fmvq Hitl . . . " ;y.-. ~4. .:~s::' . . • '
WOOdf1n . Ca~Onio ' . r:,:k+..~.;N, w p.y Vlwe ' . Co1Rer
SlWOrtrt» . Motaf WtAwooa Sunn lbtal
C__d.
CaNe+~Camr
CttiNan
Pm9n+u _ ~m
~
. LoolTransQ
~y 1G
MbWmlCifBlp' d J+' .
g~bn WIkdod L'WQ ~ g AW eknal PukUO .
Lodging Locataons
10A Colorado Municipalities March-April 1997
,
3 ILOCIglng Rt~~ervatIloIIll Fo$°m CREDIT CAItID AiJTHOYtIZATION
Cardholder Name
F Arrival Date Time .
? VISA ? AMEX O DISCOVER O MASTER CARD
Departure Date Time
` Card Number
Name Expiration Date
Municipality/Firm SRA is authorized to use the above cazd to guazantee my hotel reservations. I
Address understand that one night's room chazge will be billed to this cazd.
Signature City, State ZIP Date
Phone ( ) ? CIiECK ENCLOSEA
Total in Party r\tiUItS Children Enclosed is a check made payable to SRA for one night's room charge.
No-shows or cancellations made less than 14 days prior to airival will result in
LOH)GI1+1G PREFEItE1VCr forfeiture of deposit.
Please number first througil sevonth lodging preferences on '
the form below and then rllcck hux for type of room desired.
Complete this form anc1 muil to Snowmass ltesort Association, P.O. Box 5566, Snowmass Village, CO 81615
Choace Propert,y Nigintly Maximuxra lExtra Person Cancellataoaa
Rate Occupancy Charge (nightly) Fee
Top of Nle Vildage
? 1 bdri» $120 2 10 (under 12 free) $25
? 2 bdrm $128 6
? 3 bdrm $145 8
Tianlbee•linO
? Studit) $gs 2 10 (under 12 free) $25
? 1 bdrm $100 4
? 2 bdrm $135 6
? 3 bdrm $150 8
Wildwa?dx1 Lc>dge
? Singlc $80 4 20 (under 12 free) $25
? Double $80 4 .
Silverfaee HdDta:U (&aea $95 aaters) 4
? Singlc $95 4 25 (under 12 free) $25
? Double lPokolodi fl.cDdge
? Single $74 4 10 (under 12 free) $25
? Double $74 4
Mountajin CInaUeg (irn $78 oa~tanen~l~ real~ast)
? Sinclc 10 (under 12 free) $25
? Double $78 4
lLaurehvood
0 Singic $75 4 10 (under 12 free) $25
? Douhlc $75 4
March-April 1997 Colorado Municipalities 11A
~ s ~ ~ 1 ? • ' 1 ` ~ • -
~
. . « r~
CML Annual Go1f Toumarnent
(Please use registration form on page 9A)
~
T he Colorado Municipal League is double-booking and no-shows. Cvcry effort
pleased to announce that the 33rd annu- will be made to accommodate foursome
al golf tourna- requests. To register, complete thc golf reg-
\-ment will be istration form on page 9A and xcnd it
held Tuesday, ~ALONG WITH GOLF FEES Oli $60 PER
~ June 24, at the Aspen , PLAYER AND CONFERENCC REGIS-
Golf Course. The touma- TRATION FORM AND FEES to Colorado
ment is open to registered con- Municipal League, 1660 Lincoln St., Suite
ference participants and spous- 2100, Denver, CO 80264. Golf refiistration
es only. Tournament charge is forms must be received no latcr than
$60 per player. Lunch will be June 6. Confirmations will be m;?iled
- available at the clubhouse fol- before June 13 to the address listed on the
, lowing the toumey for an form. Golf registration forms listing
additional charge. The tour- fewer than four players will be matched
nament wi l l begin at 8: 3 0 wi t h o t her p layers.
a.m. with a shotgun start. A a'~~,~„,,. pl-lZes will be awarded for low net four-
scramble format will be used.
some score, low handicap foursome score,
Please arrive at the golf course and other events. Prizes will be awarded to
no later than 8 a.m. to check in~.-:-
gp~~~k~, the winners at the CML Annual Business
Because the tournament is lim- Meetin-, June
ited to 144 players on a first-come, 26; scores will be
first-served basis, we encourage early regis- Posted at the CML
tration. Preference will be given to offi- registracion desk
cials who register for the full conference. after the tourna-
Golf registration forms will not be ment. Special
processed for a listed player unless the
player is registered for the conference and to tourna-
golf fee is paid. ment underwriters
_ CH2M HilUOMI,
' Please notify everyone included in your CIRSA, Coors, and
foursome that you have completed a golf William M.
registration form in order to avoid Mercer, Inc.
. CML 5K FuYII all-
(Please use registration form on page 9A) A<
You are invited to partici- a 7:15 start.
pate in the CML SK Fun ~ Registration fee is
Run/Wa1k to be held $11 if registered before June 6 '
Thursday, and $14 thereafter. The registration fee
` June 26. - includes a T-shirt. Fastest dmes will be
~ The run is announced, and a drawinQ for ra.ffle prizes
underwritten will be held, at the CML Business Meeting.
by Piper Jaffray; Runners and walkers reoistered by June 6
raffle prizes donated by will receive their T-shirts at the cunference.
( RUNNER'S WORLD. The To preregister, fill out the form on page 9A
run/walk will loop around the Snowmass (don't forget to mark the Fun Run/Walk
Club. Route information will be available at lin
e on the conference reoistration form as
the CML registration desk at the confer- Well). Return th~ forms :uid payment to
ence. Participants should be at the starting Colorado Municipal Lea,ue, 1660 Lincoln
area by 7 a.m. to pick up their numbers for St, Suite 2100, Denver, CO 80264.
12A Colorado Municipalities March-April 1997
~ • ~ .
Ski merger ~nerits re~~vv
T ntil recently, few credible the city's interest in Winter Park- •
T concerns have been raised . would be harmed. The real worry is
that Vail's merger with %about the effect on consumers.
F--- Keystone and Breckenridge The fear is that, if Vail markets ag-
resorts would cause anti-trust pmb= gressively and drops,lift-ticket prices .;lems. A new court filing by Winter for a couple of years, smaller resorts
::Park, however, has raised enough like Winter Park couldn't keep pace. :
, ~questions that federal.Judge Lewis When Vail competed with Brecken- .
~Babcock should take a good look at the ridge and Keystone; none could raise ,
- ~ deal before approving it. ' prices too much or customers would
, The merger already has been bless- be lost. If all three resoits are under
ed by the U.S. Department of Justice one owner, Winter Park says no mar-
r,~;and the Colorado attorney general. In ketplace discipline will hold down
'~fact, Vail, Seystone and Breckenridge . prices. Winter Park wants Vail to di= '
'operated as a single company this ski vest either- Breckenridge or a Key-
season. Babcock's ruling should be the stone-Arapahoe Basin combination.
final word on the matter. ` Vail counters that in reality, its '
In its recent filing, Winter Park share of the Front Range skier market
again raised the question of 'whether is only about 30 percent. It argues that
the combined Vail companies would Winter Park, Copper Mountain,. -
be so large as to overw4elm competi- •.Steamboat and other resorts pose
_-tors. Vail is the lazgest ski resort in enough of a market force that even the
..,North America; Breckenridge is sec- combined Vail - could not raise prices ,
<•:=ond-largest, and Keystone ranks No. 3. without losing customers to.competi-.
'""Winter Park contends that the tors. Furthermore, it says, downhill
.'`merger gives Vai1 100'percent of the skiing is an optional activity; people
downhill ski market in Eagle County could decide not to ski at all. ~ and 77 percent of Oe market in Sum- Moreover, it is in Colorado's interest County. Vail also would command to have a strong, international com-
;;.almost 62 percent of all Front Range petitor that can go up against the•oth-
skier visits and 42 percent of Colora- er giant enterprises being created by'a
do's-total ski market. . consolidating ski business.
By selling off. Arapahce Basin, as ' While Vail makes a strong case, tHe
'the Justice Department requested, issue is so importantto Colorado that
.:.Vail would lose only 1 percent of the a judgment shouldn't be rushed. Down-
: market. That won't 'prevent anti-com- hill skiing is a$2.5. billion industry in
petitive behavior, Winter Park argues: this state, and in some. mountain la .
- Winter Park made its filing in con- cales ski resorts are the largest em-
.Junction with the city of Denver, which. ployer and economic engine.
owns the valuable U.S. Forest Service Overall, Vail has made its case dur-
permits that enable Winter Park to op= ing the past several months. But Rlin- ,
erate. The money Denver receives' ter Park and other competitors de-
from 9Vinter Park goes toward run- serve the chance to make their
" ning the city's parks. argurnents to Judge Babcock before
But the larger concern isn't whether the deal gets its final official blessing.
~ ~t ~u~~.,., ~GS7'o •c~• 9Q- - ~,a,c,i.2 !J~
. .
~s~G92 Cl~ _
)Jz"
~
,
,
~,:74
- ~f
~S =
~ ~ -
t, ~ . _ ? ~ ~1~~ ~ :
y,:
. . ~ «:J
RECEIVED APR 1 4 199?
WILLIAM I.MORTON
April 10, 1997
. Mayor Bob Armour and Town Council Members
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mayor Armour & Town Council Members:
As an owner in the Mill Creek building for the past seven years and one that
welcomes progress and the responsible improvements in Vail, I write you this
morning with great concerns about the Sonnenalp Austria Haus. Having
watched the process of SDD, I would state without any reservations that this
potential development has far exceeded responsible planning and good
judgement.
I'rti not enough involved in the day-to-day followings of the Town Council, yet
I believe that our goals of "responsibility" are probably in alignment. My
inclination, as I review this proposed building, is that it is so much larger than
the current one that it potentially speaks of a domino effect that could continue
throughout the entire viliage and, ultimately, destroy its intimacy and charm.
I urge your responsible consideration as we all have desire for responsibility and
goal of maintaining the integrity and quality of Vail. Beyond the Austria Haus, I
believe that the SDD is counter productive to the best interests of Vail.
Sincerely,
~
William Morton
WM/bj
VIA IFAX # 970 479-2157
WILLIAM I. MORTON
WOODSIDE ROAD-DEER PARK
Q~'iREENWICH, CONNECTICUT 06830
ee
e4
~'O ~l OF ~AIL
75 South Frontage ltoad
T/ail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
FOR GMMEDIATE RELEASE .
April 14, 1997
Contact: Bob McLaurin, 479-2105
Vail Town Manager
It's Shorter, Easuer to Fill Out...
TOV CONBMUN9TY SURVEY TO 9iIT THE MA9LBOXES TIi1S WEEK
NEVI! FORMAT ESTABL9SHED TO IIAAXIMiZE PARTICIPAT90N
(Vail)--If you have suggestions for the Vail Town Council or other comments about
municipal government in Vail--hold those thoughts. At least until you receive a copy of
the Town of Vail's new, easy-to-use community survey. The 10,000 surveys are being
mailed this week for the tenth year; this time, with an emphasis on participation.
Responses are used to shape future municipal priorities.
This year's mail-back survey has been reworked into a new format for added
convenience. It's shorter (four pages) and results will be tabulated by optical scanner
for faster results.
"We know it's the end of ski season and most folks are ready to leave town for a
break," said Bob McLaurin, Vail town manager. "But, before you do, please take a
moment to fill out the survey and return it to the town. This is our annual report card.
It's important to hear from as many people as possible."
In addition to satisfaction ratings for municipal services, the new survey asks
respondents to comment on six topics which surfaced during the past year:
(more)
RECYCLEDPAPER
_ .i
rt
~Community Survey/Add 1
• free parking in the structures from 3 p.m. to 7 a.m.
• economic vitality in Vail Village and Lionshead
• use of the Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT)
• streamwalk expansiori
• loading and delivery in the commercial core
• citizen participation
The survey is being mailed to approximately 8,500 residents and business owners,
plus another 1,500 randomly selected part-time residents. Respondents are asked to
return the survey within 10 days. RRC Associates, a Boulder-based research firm, will
tabulate the results.
Results from past surveys have been used to:
• fund improvements to the Main Vail and West Vail interchanges
• appoint a full-time housing coordinator
• establish a walk-in service counter for Community Development
Department customers
• streamline the town's development review process (now underway)
• emphasize citizen involvement in community problem-solving
"The survey has been an important tool in identifying new focus areas and in
evaluating our customer service levels," McLaurin said. "We're holding a mirror up to
ourselVes to find out if we're in synch with community expectations and needs."
_ That's why participation is critical. McLaurin said the survey has been reworked this
year to encourage responses from svery household and business. "With this simplified
format, we're challenging everyone to take 10 minutes to help prioritize what's
important." In the past, the annual survey return rate has averaged about 15 percent.
This year the town is aiming for a response rate of 20 percent or higher.
For more information, or to receive a copy of the citizen survey, contact the
Community Information Office at 479-2115.
# # #
a Town of Vail Community Survey 1997
~
~
~
{
The following questions probe certain issues related to the adequacy and performance of the Town of Vail government. We would ~
appreciate your response to the exfent which you are able. Please darken the appropriate circles using b/ue or black ink or pencil. ~
If you have no opinion, or no knowledge oi a particular subject, please leave blank or indicate in the appropriate space. P/ease attach ~
sheeP forany additional comments or suggestions. ~
~
- - ~
~
What do you believe are the three biggest issues, in order How do you rate your satisfaction with the following services in the. ~
of priority, facing the Town of Vail? Town of Vail? cm
NotatAll Vefi.vontKnow/ Em
PUBLIC WORKS Satisfied~~",' 3etlslTed wo oplnlon ~
2 Snow removal
Road and street maintentancel
(potholes, crack sealing, drainage, etc.)
3. Neighborhood park availability`~:
Park playground equipment safety Q Q O O O 0 ~
~
Have you used the bus system within the past 12 months? ~
Are you aware thaf fhe Town has focused affention on a citizen Q Yes Q No ~
participation program wifh emphasis on an open, honest and ~ fairpro cess? n~orar,~u „~.~;-~yerynoov~owi ~
THEBUSSYSTEflH Satistled ,~~'.~:~~~i-.~-f~:.~$a}jSfled,NoOpinlon ~
O Yes Q No Q Don't know / No opinion Frequency of bus senrice: ~m~ ~
In-town shuttle
Has it made a difference? Q Yes Q No Sandstone route (2) O 0 0
~
Why do you say fhat? East Vail route 'O 0. 0 ~
West Vail route O O O O O O an
Golf Course route O O O am
Lionsridge Loop route O O O O O O ~
Ford Park route O O. O O O O ~
How satisfied are you, in general, wifh the overall performance Quality of bus senrice: ~
o f t he Town o f Vail govemment? Bus driver cou r tesy O O O O O O im
Noratau ',7~~7,.f` ye;y Dependability of bus service ~ O O (D O 0 ~
saUsfea , .~`saasr?ed C?eanliness ot buses . O O O O O. O ~
Current Town Council O O~O ~ O (D Cleanliness of Vail Transportation ~
B o a r d s a n d C o m m i s s i o n s O O O O O Bus Terminal O O O O O O cm
Town of Vail staff (D
. ~
Have you used public parking within the past 12 months? ~
Specifrcally, over the past year, how would you rate the - 0 Yes , Q No ~
responsiveness of the following groups? wotar,4u
PARKIAIG Nery'vonY?tnor~l
~`~4~~~ %Oplnlon ~
Getting Stayed the Gotten Discount arkin ro rdm SaW
Better Same Worse p 9 P 9 - - . - . . ~
(debit card/blue, gold pass) . O.~ O O-O O O ~
Current Town Council Q Q Q Booth attendant courtesy O O O O O 0 ~
Boards and Commissions Q Q O Speed of transaction at exit booth Q,.. Q,:(O :•O O 0 ~
Town of Vail staff Q , Q Overall parking fees/pricing structure ~ z s a 5
~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
And why do you say that? Do any particular departments, The "Park Free After 3" . . r7n
boards or commissions stand out in terms of changes you expenmental program O,. O.._ O.: O. O- O ~
have seen, either positive or negative? Do you have specific Cleanliness and lighting of ~
suggestions on how we could be more responsive? parking structures 0 ~
Comments/suggestions for improvement in any of the above categories: ~
(Please attach sheet if more space is needed for comments.)
°
~
0
~
0
0
0
0
0 ~
m The Community Development Department provides planning, design Have you visited the library within the past 12 months? `
m review, environmental health, and building inspection servir,es. O Yes O No
m Have you used the Community Development DepaRment withrn z
m the past 12 months? 0 Yes 0 No How satisfied are you with the following services and facilities?
NotatAll
Very DonYKnow!
Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of tfiis department. L16RARY savstied°:sansr?ed No Oplnion
~ NotatAll VeryDonYKnow/ Research information Q O O O O.:~._O
~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Satlsfred SaHsfied No oPinion Circulation services Q Q Q Q Q Q
~ Overall seroice and efficiency (D 0 ~ O O 0 Fiction books O ~ ~ O 0 0
~ Courtesy and attitude (D ~ Q Q Q Q Nonfiction books Q Q Q Q Q o
~ Competence and professionalism (D (D Q Q Q Q Magazines and newspapers O O O O O,. ::0
~ Development review process-staff O ~ O O O 0 Altemate media including ,
~ Development review process- videos and books on tape (D ~ 0 O O 0.
~ Design Review Board 0 On-line databases O ~ O O O-~~~
ow Development review process-Plan- Youth materials O O O O O ~
~ ning & Environmental Commission 0 Youth programs
~ Building permit plan review Q. Q Q New library hours ~ O Q Q Q Q'
~ Building permit tumaround time (D O 0 Commentslsuggestions for improvement in the above categories:
The walk-in service counter O O. . O O O= O
Building inspections O O O O O O
~ Restaurant inspection and
~ education program Q Q- Q Do you hold a library card in the Town of Vail?
~ Environmental planning program O. CD Q O 0 0 0 Yes 0 No
~ Commentslsuggestions for improvement in the above categories:
~ Do you and your family members feel welcome at the library?
~ O Yes 0 No 0 Don't know / No opinion
~ How do you rate your satisfaction wifh the following seivices in the How satisfied are you with the following services and facilities?
~ TOwn Of V21!? NotatAll Very Don4Know/ NotatAl! Very. DuntKnowl
~ FlRE Satisfied Satlsfied No Opinion TOWN ADMINISTRATION Satisfied .`--ts ~ $etlSfied No Oplnion
_
~ Fire protedtion and response time (D 0 ~ O 0... O General administration Emergency medical services O OO O OO O O (manager's office, finance
~ Fire education services O O. O O (D ~ O department, clerk's*office, staf) O~:`:`
~ Courtesy and attitude O O 0 O O 0 Information dissemination
.
~ Fire department plan review O. U_ O (D_, 0.:' 0 (mee6ng notices, announcements,
~ Fire inspection program O O O O O O project updates) O O O O O O
~ Fire code enforcement ; & Municipal Court O"' O OM
~ FRONTAGE ROAD MAINTENANCE Finance/cashier window ~ O O ~ 0
m (provided by the State of Colorado) O_ ~ O O O O Sales tax and business
-m ANlMAL CONTROL SERVICES (contracted from Eagle Counry) license services
~ Patrols for leash law violaGons . ~ O O>.-.O O
Response time to complaints O O Commentslsuggestions for improvement in fhe above categories:
~ O O O~ Overall quality of service = - : ::0
~ POL/CE
~ Overall feeling ot safety and security(D (2): ~ O O-.. 0 Since 1980, the Town of Vail has used a one percent real estate .
~ Visibility of police foot/vehicle patrol O O O O O 0 transfer tax (RETn for the purchase of open space and development
~ Fnendliness and approachability of and maintenance of parks and trails within the Town of Vail.
~ Vail police department employees _ (D:.~.::-:._
~ Overall quality of service _ O O O__ O O ~ Wouid you support maintaining the current status OR
~ Overali faimess of police empioyees 12~~ Q Q`~Q expanding the use of this fund for additional needs?
~ Enforcement of traffic regulations O Maintain O Expand O Don't know / No opinion
~ (speeding, reckless driving, DUI, etc.) 0 Q (D Q Q Q
s Commentslsuggestions for improvement in the above catego?ies: Specifically, would you support utilizing a portion of RETT revenues
s to support (MARK ALL THAT APPLY):
~ O Acquisition/protection of open space OUTSIDE the Town of Vail ~ O Acquisition of locals housing WITHIN the Town of Vail
~ List the top three problems or activifies you would like the Police Dept. Q Acquisition of locals housing OUTSIDE the Town of Vail
~ (officers and employees) to spend their time addressing and performing: Q Other:
1• - Comments/suggestions:
~ 2
~
3.
~
~ ~ 0
, Would you support completion of the Town of Vai! Streamwalk along Over the past several years, has the sense of community within m
Gore Creek from the Covered Bridge to the Vail lnterfaith Chapel? the Town improved, gotten worse, or stayed the same? o
O Yes 0 No 0 Don't know / No opinion O Improved 0 Stayed the same a
! O Gotten worse Q Don't know / No opinion o
Would you support completion of the Streamwalk from the Covered a
Bridge to Lionshead? Comments:
O Yes Q No 0 Don't know / No opinion o
Comments: Over the past year, in which of the following have you participated? m
(IVIARK ALL THAT APPLY.) e
0 Ford Park Management Q Trees for Vail m
How satisfied are you wifh the mannerin which loading and delivery Plan meetings Q Path Clean Up Day o
is handled at the
Idot at All ~;Very, DonYKnow/ O West Vail interchange Q Attend Town Council
present time in: Sa~~ :No Opinion meetin s
- 9 and/or board and ~
_ Vail Village O O Q O Vail Tomorrow meetings , commission meetings ~
Lionshead
0 Lionshead Redevelopment Q Other: 10
. If a problem, please explain: Master Plan meetings 10
O Town of Vail Clean Up Day Q None ~
~
In your opinion, should the Village Commercia/ Core (Bridge Street, Are there other events or activities you participate in that make you ~
Gore Creek Dnve, etc.) be designated (AAARK OME OAIL r: feel especially "connected" to the Vail community? ~
EM
O A pedestrian-only area at all times (would restrict all surface vehicles) cm
OR
O A pedestrian-only area some of the time (would allow loading and ~
delivery during a portion of time in designated areas and locations) Do you have any comments regarding the value of participating in ~
O Other: Vail activities, or how processes can be improved for volunteering
Please explain your suggestion (hours, location, size of vehides, etc.): in Vail? ~
~
~
Are you aware of the "Park Free After 3" program in the Vail Village EM
and Lionshead parking structures between 3 p.m. and 7 a.m.? ~
0 Yes Q No Q Don't know / No opinion How do you prefer to receive information from the Town? ~
How has the availability of free parking changed your use (MARK,4LL TH,4T APPLY.) ~
of the Vail commercial core areas Gready 1 0 Attend meetings ~
since Marchl? No •:lncreased 2 O Mailings from the Town ~
Change Use ofArea 3 Q Newspaper coverage ~
In Vail Village 0 (D Q Q Q 4 Q Public notices, announcements, advertisements ~
In Lionshead 0 0 Q Q Q 5 0 Radio EM
In what way? 6 O Television (channels 5, 8) cm
_ 7 Q Internet Im
8 0 E-mail: ~
What is your e-mail address? ~
Are there any additional actions by the Town or merchants that 9 Q Other: ~
would increase your use of businesses rn the Village commercial Please describe. rIN
core or Lionshead?
Im I
• Yes (please describe) aesr wAY To cm
• No ' From the list above what is the BEST REacH ME Im
O Don't know / No opinion way to reach you with town information? Q Q cm
How would you rate the overall sense of community (for example, (INSERT NUMBER FROA9 L/ST ABOVE.) M-M
knowing your neighbors, caring and concemed
cifizens, etc.) in the Town Poor Exceilent O O ~
~ 0 0
of Vail at the present time? Q~ Y0 0 ~ Q O ~
m
Comparing Vail to other resort communities you are familiar with, r__1
what is Vail's greatest strength in terms of the sense of community? How do you prefer fo offer construcfive feedback to the Town? ME
r'3in
And what is Vail's greatest weakness?
m
0
m
~ ~
_ 51
~ Do you have compufer access to the Intemet at home, at work, What town or local information and/or services would you like
~ or at school? , to see made available on the Intemet? (MARK ALL TNAT APPLY.)
_ O No IF NA-Do you intend 0 Yes r
~ Q Phone numbers
= O Yes to gain access in the Q No Q Codes and regulations
next year? Q Uncertain Q Council, PEC, DRB agendas
0 Forms ~ 0 Information and announcements
~ Have you tried accessing the Have you used the Intemet to Q Job openings
~ Intemet at the Vail Library? access Town of Vail information
0 Calendar listings
~ O Yes Q No via fhe vail.net system? Q Other (Please describe):
~ O Yes Q No
~
~
.
• Please provide the following demographic information. Feel free to leave blank any questions you are not comfortable answering. -
~ Again, surveys will remain anonymous. Please do not write your name or address on this survey. '
Where is your residence within the Town of Vail located? Which of these categories best describes your marital sfatus?
~ O East Vail Q Single, no children
~ 0 Booth Falls and Bald Mountain Road areas 0 Couple, no children
~ 0 Booth Creek/Aspen Lane Q Household with children
~ O Golf Course Q Empty nester, children no longer at home
~ O Vail Village
~ O Lionshead .
~ O Potato Patch, Sandstone o to 5 s ro 12 13 ro 18
years years years,;:;-`
~ O Buffehr Creek, Lionsridge, the Valley 1F YOU HAVE Q,Q 0 7~
m O Vail Commons/Safeway area CHILDREN- (D 0 . Q.~ QG)
~ O West Vail (north of I-70) How many are in the 020 ~ O Matterhom, Glen Lyon following age groups? O, O (24 60 ~ O Intermountain O O
= O Not a resident of the Town of Vail
O O O; O O`O
~ Do you own orrent yourresidence? O O O`O
m 0 Own 0 Other (specify): O,OO , Oe O; 0 QYQ T:-+
m 0 Rent 9 9 9 9 . 9; 9
~ . . . ~ ; _
Do you own or operate a business within the Town of Vail?
- ~ O Yes -
-=r.:. .
= O No Q. O. Which of these categories best
_ Including yourself, - C1 Q descnbes your age?
~ W hic h o f t he fo Uowing ca tegories best describes your how many persons O O O Under 20 0 45 to 54
~ residency status? reside in your Q Q , O 20 to 24 Q 55 to 64 -
~ O Year-round Vail resident household? 004 0 25 to 34
~ 0 Seasonal Vail resident O 65 or over
~ O Owner of vacation ro e in Vail ~ 35 to 44 Q Do not wish
p p~ O O to reply
~ O Non-resident, owner of business or commercial ~,G) '
~ property in Vail ~ 0.
~ O Other:
9 9
~ .
~ How long have you lived wifhin fhe Town of Vail
~(or owned property if a non-resident) ? Which of these categories best describes the annual income
~ O Less than 1 year of your househofd (before taxes)?
~ O 1 to 5 years Q$0 -14,999 Q$75,000 - 99,999
_ O 6 to 15 years Q$15,000 - 34,999 Q$100,000 -149,999
~ O More than 15 years 0 $35,000 - 49,999 0 $150,000 or more
~
s 0 $50,000 - 74,999 Q Do not wish to reply
s Thank you for your participation in our continuing evaluation program.
~ Please attach sheet far additional comments or suggestions.
~ DesignExpertTM by NCS Printed in U.S.A. Mark ReflexO MW212815.1 654321 qMgg
~ m
~
_ 04/14/97 MON 10:36 FAg 970 476 7994 CDKR Ye: ~G--- Z002
;.3 r<
Va?1
u a
~ill~;e ° oQ
Merchant
Association Po 6ux 2135, vail, co 81658
To the Va].1 Town Council:
Unfortunately, T have to be out of town durzng what could
be a pivotal week in Vail's history. Fina~ly, aftew all of
these yeax-s, the housing issue is being addressed seriouslye
Just this week alone on Wednesday and Thursday Vail Tomorrow's
housing recommendations wi11 be made to the communi.ty, on
Thursday the Eagle Valley I,eadership Coalition will continue
its woxk on the Housing Trust Fund and the Proposed I,oGals°
Housing Work Program will be presented to the Town Councile
~
I pf all the issues tacing us toc~ay, housing (px the laCk of
it) poses the most serious ramifications foz without adequate
affordable housing units east of Dowd Junctxoxa, we cannot
continae to Lsr.ovide aur guests wzth the experienCe that they
have came to expect and that we have promised thc:m. ~ As you wili be EClade aware via Vail Tomorrow, we view seasonal
housxng ta be the cornerstnne of the pzoblem solving processo
We are calling it the Triekle Up Effect, in other wards, wheri
seasoraal workers' housing needs are znet, units Qtherwise oc-
cupied by them will be freed up fox permanent residentso Many
suggestiors as to locations will be presented with one taleing
a priorbty in both Lionshead and the Villageo without stealing
the thunder of the coanmittee's long months of vork, let me
just urge you to liste+ arefully with open minds, In ordez
for us to anake progress in this axea, rae all will have to
look at the problem in a new;~and,.creative way, Tt 'c,rizl require
keeping the ult'imate goal in foCUS - to prov'ide affprdabie
housing fox seasonal woxkers east of powd Junctiona This must
be a priority for the Vai.l eommunzty as emplpyment needs con-
tinue to inCxease at a time when current employee housing
units are about to decreases zea Sunbird Lodge and Timber Ridgea
I think if we al1 acknowl.e.dge the.sevexity,:-of the pzoblem and
pledge to solve it, we can Turn It'Arouzad and talce one step
towards guaranteeing our future successo
Ka~'e `F rry
. Pres., Vail Village MercYiants' Association
As an addendum, I wquld urge you to resChedule the May 6 meeting
of the TC re: County Housing Policies until June. 17ue to the
prevalent May vacation rituais of many locals, a iot of valuable
pubiic input and dissemination of information w'i11 be missed.
` •
P '
b
RLLJDY & ASSOCIAT1dJS9 A oCo
Attorneys and Counsellors at Law
Suite 210, WestStar Bank Bldg. Suite 201
108 South Frontage Road 715 West Main
Vail, Colorado 81657 Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 476-8865 (970) 925-8774
FAX (970) 479-9773 FAX (970) 479-9773
Michael W. Standard, Esq.
April 14, 1997
Reply to VAIL Office
Vail Town Council
75 S. Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Special Development District No. 35, Austria Haus
Streamwalk Proposal
Dear Council Members:
This firm represents the Bishop Park Homeowners Association. I spoke briefly at the
public session on March 25, 1997, registering Bishop Park's opposition to the streamwalk
proposed in conjunction with the Austria Haus. My comments that evening were very brief because I did not feel that a public session was the appropriate place to set out in full all the
reasons, legal or otherwise, for our opposition to the streamwalk. However, based on the results
of that -meetirig, I feel that it is now time to set out in detail our opposition to this aspect of the
Austria Haus proposal.
The following issues represent the key concerns of Bishop Park in regard to the proposed
streamwalk:
• The open space covenant was intended to protect the natural condition of the
streambank. The 1971 amendments to the 1962 filings specifically forbid
improvements along the streambank. These legally enforceable covenants form the
basis for reasonable expectations of the relevant property owners. The legal rights
and reasonable expectations of these property owners are being violated by the
Town's continuing efforts to extend the streamwalk.
o The majority of Vail was simply not developed with sufficient set-back to facilitate a
streamwalk. The continuation of the streamwalk would direct pedestrian traffic to
within feet of private homes, bedrooms windows, patios and decks. This traffic
would lead to a variety of problems including, but not limited to, invasion of privacy,
~
Vail Town Council
April 14, 1997
Page 2
infringement on the reasonable expectations of the property owners, security
problems and destruction of private property.
a The construction of a streaixiwalk through the village would have a detrimental impact
, on the environment. The topography of the stream in the village would lead to ~
_ problems in the initial construction of such a project. The increased pedestrian traffic
, would continue to harm the environment surrounding the stream; creating problems
with litter, animal waste and the destruction of habitat.
o A streamwalk would redirect pedestrian traffic and business away from the
commercial corridors of the Town.
o The Town is setting a dangerous, and perhaps illegal, precedent by conditioning the
approval of the SDD on the applicant's agreement not to remonstrate against the
streamwalk proposal. The applicant stated publicly that its agreement to this
condition was purely involuntary.
These are the main concerns of Bishop Park and but a few of the concerns expressed by
citizens and property owners who have spoken out against the proposed streamwalk. I have
followed this particular proposal through the Planning Commission and I think it is fair to say
that Bishop Park joins a majority of the property owners along the stream in opposition to a
streamwalk of any kind. The applicaixt is certainly not voluntarily in favor of the streamwalk.
Further, the following individuals and organizations represent a few of those who have publicly
opposed the streamwalk:
The East Village Homeowners Association
Riverhouse Association -
The uillage Center John Hardy, property owner since 1967
Joe Trelevin spoke out on behalf of fifty-six (56) owners from the Village Center Condos
David Kenya, developer
Cathie and Morgan Douglas opposed the streamwalk via a letter dated February 7, 1997,
and submitted the to Town Council and the Planning Commission.
Maud Duke opposed the streamwalk via a letter dated February 10, 1997, and submitted
to the Town Council and the Planning Commission
The Planning Commission members recognized these issues and a majority of the
Commission members also opposed the streamwalk. These Planning Commission members
were either skeptical of any benefits uf a streamwalk or outright opposed to the idea. Their
comments touched on all the issues addressed above: reasonable expectations and privacy
concerns of the property owners, the destruction of private property and the need to maintain and
restore the natural state of Gore Creek. Further, the Planning Commission members recognized
Vail Town Council
April 14, 1997
Page 3
that the issue should be addressed on a broad policy basis, and it was not proper to make it a
condition of any one project. For this reason, the Planning Commission sent the issue up to the
Council specifically requesting guidance on a broad policy basis.
. The Council's conditional approval of the SDD subject to the applicant's agreement not._.
to remonstrate against the streamwalk raises serious legal and ethical questions.. No applicant
should be required to waive his rights under the covenants in order to win the Council's
approval. The streamwalk is not a central issue in the overall proposal. However, its conditional
inclusion by the Council leaves the appearance that the applicant is being "blackmailed," as the
applicant himself phrased it, into acceptance. I assure you that, should the applicant agree to
these terms, the remaining property owners are not waiving any of their rights under the
protective covenants and amendments.
Council members spoke at great length about setting a"practical," though not legal,
precedent by their decision. I urge the council to consider this "practical" precedent and address
this issue head-on and not condition any redevelopment on the inclusion of a streamwalk.
The Town may face a serious legal challenge should it continue to extend the streamwalk
in violation of the covenants and amendments. The covenants prohibit amendment except with
the prior written approval of 75% of the owners of privately owned land. Any attempt to force a
streamwalk on an individual owner would violate the covenants in general and the provision
regarding amendments to the covenants. The 1971 amendments to the covenants specifically
prohibit a"structure, building, or improvement of any kind or character" upon the stream right-
of-way. The expressed purpose of the amendment is to preserve this area in its "natural
condition." This filing also prohibits amendment except by written consent of Vail Associates,
Inc. and the Town of Vail, to be filed in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County,
Colorado. Private property owners, such as my clients, are the intended beneficiaries of these
covenants and amendments. They are expressly entitled to enforce the covenants, as well as seek
actual and punitive damages.
I am also compelled to address one of the responses to my brief remarks before the
Council. One gentleman suggested that Bishop Park was only opposed to the streamwalk
because it could cost the property owners $10,000. This gentleman does not speak for my
client's motives. I have no idea where he got this figure, and this has never been an issue of
concern for my clients. Simply stated, their primary concerns are not monetary in nature.
Rather, their concerns are fully and accurately stated above.
In closing, Bishop Park will actively oppose the current streamwalk proposal and any
future extension of the streamwalk. This situation is not analogous to someone building next to
an airport and then complaining of the noise. Rather, the property owners purchased and
developed their property with the reasonable expectations that the covenants and amendments
would be respected and the stream would remain in its natural state. I respectfully urge the
. .
~
Vail Town Council April 14, 1997
Page 4
Council to withdraw the streamwalk proposal and demonstrate its intention now, and in the
future, to abide by the covenants and amendments by rejecting all proposals for extension of the
streamwalk. In so doing, I also urge the Council to respond to the specific request of the
Planning Commission and advise that body of the legal impediments to the extension of the
streamwalk through the village.
Very truly yours,
Michael W. Standard
cc: Brooks Thomas, President,
Bishop Park Homeowners Association
x C~cuc~er~.
THE STATE-LOCAL
~
TS NOi ,x..
imm . 1
This;newsletter ~s published by the ~oloracio Di~saon of Loc~ Go~ernment to prnvide`a fnrum for the state to;
advise gavernment,afficials abaut matt~rs whicli concern thein If yvu have ideas on future topics which you,;
wc~uld like us to address, please contact the D~v~s~on; of Local Government at (303) Sfi6-215t5
LUL0RAT1)0% LISTENIING CAMPLAILIGN
L ast fall, the Governor's with local needs through group Commissioner Dick Thompson stated,
Commission on National and discussion of various issues "Volunteerism is a socialization
Community Service launched an surrounding civic participation. process." Service is empowering and
uutiative to discover current efforts to can instill in a young person a sense of
engage citizens in the civic life of the To date, the Colorado Listening independence and confidence. For
community and learn what kinds of Campaign has visited the following example, Glenwood Springs High
support are needed to expand service communities: Winter Park, Fraser, School students raised over $75,000 in
and volunteerism. The Colorado Granby, Kremmling, Steamboat three years to build a pedestrian mall
Listening Campaign has been visiting Springs, Hayden and Craig, Grand and were mcently awarded a National
communities across Colorado and Junction, Parachute, Rifle, New Castle Philanthropy Day Award. A
meeting with citizens from all wallcs and Glenwood Springs, Montrose, Glenwood Springs High School
of life to discuss civic involvement in Delta, Ridgway, Ouray, Nucla, student explained that "We didn't
our communities. The genesis of the Naturita, Crested Butte and understand the meaning of the word
Colorado Listening Campaign was the Gunnison, Parker, Leadville, Cortez, 'no; and we believed there was
State's Smart Growth and Durango, Ignacio, Pagosa Springs, nothing we could not accomplish."
Development Initiative, a citizen- Antonito, Alamosa/San Luis Valley,
driven uutiative to address issues that Salida, and a multi-county meeting in II. Communities want to create
face all Colorado communities. Four Sterling. citizen leaders.
of the Smart Growth There are plenty of people to
recommendations address increasing volunteer for short periods of time,
citizen participation in Colorado V~FiRES FROM THE COtORADO but few are taking a leadership role
communities. a~$~~~~~~ P~~~~ and driving an ongoing cause. In
other words, it is easy to get
The Colorado Listening Campaign has volunteers to help with an event like
held meetings attended by elected and I. Communities must create "things Special Olympics but difficult to get
appointed officials, educators, for kids to do." someone to sit on a community board.
business people, service clubs, health The Commission has ta]ked with For instance, Mary Moynihan, parent
care and huxnan service providers, young people ages 10-18 about their from Fraser, and Gary Harris,
law enforcement, clergy, youth, community, and they continue to say Principal, Fraser Valley Elementary
retirees, and other individuals and "there's nothing for us to do" and "no School, explained that 196 out of 200
agencies. One result of these meetings place for us to go." The solutions parents showed up to back to school
has been the joining of local resources seem to be creating job opportunities, night at Fraser Valley Elementary but
activities, and community service only 8 out of 200 parents sit on the
opportunities. Most young people Parent Advisory Council.
9 ~p think of service as something the court
~S ~ u~SIDE mandates, not something one would III. Communities faced with growth
do for altruistic reasons. If we foster want to maintain the identity
an ethic of service in young people, and character of the community.
they will be much more likely to be The issue of growth management is
~~~~~~~~NT RATE community minded and to volunteer very much a local one, making it a
SMARTGROWTH as an adult. Young people are also prime place for citizens to get actively
200~ less likely to be destructive to a engaged in their community. Many of
community to which they feel the concerns voiced during the
connected. As Grand County COIVTINUED OIV PAGE 2
THE STATE-LOCAL CONNE(TION PAGE 1
NE COLORADO
. ~ .W
~ V LISTENING
a N~.~~~ CAMPAIGN
by Geoff Withers, Division of Local different slant on the same issue. CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1
Government
The Havens case was specific to the Colorado Listening Campaign are
directly related to Colorado s rapid
calculatian of "fiscal year spending;'
In l(ition but it is not unreasonable to believe population growth, transportation,
The 1996 CPI percent change was that the same principle might apply housing, the environment, under
3.5%, as released by the U.S. Bureau to other T'ABOR limits, such as served working class, and
of Labor Statistics (BLS). The 1995 property tax revenue and mill levies. disconnection from and a lost sense of
figure was 4.3%. Based on current See infonnation below on the latest community.
interpretations of TABOR, these research publication of the Division of
numbers are used as "inflation" in 'Through the Colorado Listening
Local Government s for more
calculating TABOR property tax information on this subject. Campaign, the Govemor's
revenue and "fiscal year spending" Commission is collecting best
limits in 1997 and 1996 respectively. . practices in citizen involvement and is
sharing those practices statewide.
Current projections for 1997 inflation, rubl'cat1on The Coirunission is plaiululg to
which will be used in developing The Division of Local Government implement a follow-up phase to the
1998 budgets, are 3.6% from the has recently completed a research Colorado Listening Campaign which
Legislative Council and 3.5% from publication entitled "TABOR, will include the following: 1)
the Govemor's Office of State Gallagher and Mill Levies: Are Local continue to develop a statewide
Planning and Budgeting. The actual Revenues Being Shortchanged?" The network of organizations that support
annual figure will not be released statewide effect of the "Gallagher increased citizen involvement by
until about March 1,1998. These Amendment" (Art. X, Sec 3, Colo. providing resources, training and
forecasts will be revised quarterly ConstJ is briefly examined, as are the technical assistance, regional
during 1997. For those who are limitations on increases in property workshops, seminars and training
budgeting more than one year in tax revemze (TABOR and "5.5%"). opportuiuties; 2) develop a public
advance, economists are currently The focus of the paper is on local awareness campaign that can be
projecting a decline in the CPI percent interpretation of the TABOR mill levy personalized for individual
change in future years. Please call the limit. The question is whether an communities to help increase citizen
Division of Local Government at alternative interpretation of the mill involvement and volunteerism; 3)
(303) 866-2156 for more information, levy limit is justified, given the enhance the civic infrastructure at the
including an historical listing of CPI Supreme Court rulings in the Havens local level by serving as a convener or
changes dating from 1968. and Bolt cases. facilitator of civic engagement via
training and technical assistance; and
If, indeed, an overriding principle of 4) develop a Govemor's Award to
L'atigation TABOR is to not work a reduction in recognize outstanding civic
In Havens v Board of Countv government services, then it may be involvement and volunteer efforts.
Commissioners of Archuleta Countv, possible to raise mill levies without a While the Colorado Listening Campaign
20 Colorado Journal 1344 (Colo. vote to realize the same revenue as in will continue as an on-going initiative
1996), the Supreme Court upheld the the previous year. It may also be of the Governor s Commission on
County's ability to refer a measure to possible to raise mill levies and National and Community Service, the
its citizens without requiring a revenue to account for inflation and intensity of the effort will be reduced
"revenue chan e as an offset" in local gro~n~th, as was the common over the coming months and the focus
g
future years. Among the details of practice before TABOR. will shift to follow-up and
the Court's holdings is a principle implementation. Smaller day trips
which could prove of the utmost The paper• does not attempt to answer will be planned throughout the
importance to local governments. all the questions around this issue, Denver metro area, the eastern plains,
The Court reiterated their finding in since it will require at least one court and the southeastern region of the
Bolt v Ara ahoe Coun School decision tu do so. This examination is state. Field staff will assist in on-
District #6 898 P.2d 525 (Colo. 1995), intended to provoke discussion about going efforts throughout the state.
that it would not adopt "a rigid an important subject. Copies of the For more information about the
interpretation of Amendment #1 paper are available from the Division
which would have the effect of of Local Government,1313 Sherman Colorado Listening Campaign, please
working a reduction in government Street, Room 521, Denver, CO 80203, contact the Govemor's Commission
services." In Havens, the question (303) 866-2156, and can be ordered by on National and Community Service
was whether government services using the.Reply Form in this at (303) 866-4975 or (800) 376-2728.
would be allowed to grow, a slightly newsletter.
PAGE 2 THE STATE-LO(AL CONNECTION
,tw
.e"C .
i. €a~..o.. . _ . _ ' . UPDATE findings in June 1996 that funding for Senate Local Government Committee
state and local transportation needs and is currently awaiting action in the
More than two years have passed over the next 20 years will fall at least Senate Appropriations Committee. If
since Governor Romer announced the $13 billion short. you would like a copy of SB97-113, or
Smart Growth and Development need any mare information on this
Initiative. On February 21,1997, an A proposed $6 billion package is item, contact Geoff Withers, Division
update was released on progress in taking shape as a"first step" toward of Local Government, 303-866-4660.
advancing the action agenda addressing the $13 billion shortfall,
developed by the Smart Growth and which includes using state budget
Development Interregional Council surplus dollars ($1.5 billion), current IRC Recommendation #5-
(IRC). That agenda consisted of 74 highway user trust funds ($1 billion), Integrated Planning
specific recommendations for action sales taxes in the Denver metro area
to achieve smart growth. Originally for RTD ($1 billion), and user fee Recommendation #5 called for
adopted in November 1995, these increases ($2.5 billion). These funds improved transportation and
recommendations have guided the would finance 28 statewide priority comprehensive planning in all
actions of Smart Growth participants projects identified by the Colorado communities across the state. A
for well over a year. On nearly all Deparhnent of Transportation guidebook which addresses this
fronts, progress has been achieved, (CDOT), as well as local priority recommendation has just been
and ongoing growth management projects, such as RTD's "Guide the
completed, entitled, „Managing
strategies have been institutionalized Ride" project and other communities' Colorado's Future: A Guidebook for
in a variety of areas. needs. For further information, Integrating Land Use, Transportation
contact Steve Coffin at CTN, 303-573- and Air Quality Planning." The
The report documents successes and 4425. guidebook provides the tools and
points to ongoing efforts as resources identified by the steering
Coloradans continue to address corrunittee that are needed to help
growth-related challenges. To learn IRC Recommendation #2-Tax make it easier for Colorado
more or to become involved in this Policy communities to integrate their
effort, contact the Smart Growth planning efforts in the areas of land
Action Center at (303) 866-2817 or From the activity over the past year, it use, air quality and transportation.
14800) 899-GROW (4769). You can seems that there are a number of The Guidebook includes principles of
also visit the Smart Growth and groups who agree with the IRC that a comprehensive plaiuling; a checklist
Development website at: comprehensive analysis of current that can help communities evaluate
http://wwwstate.co.us/smartgrowth. government revenue and expenditure how well decisions are currently being
Following are updates on several of patterns should be pursued. The integrated, a tool box of techniques on
the key IRC recommendations. State-Local Forum (SLF), made up of how to implement integrated
state and local elected officials and planning, and a resource directory
cabinet members, resolved to study that contains information on the legal
IRC Recommendation #1-Blue these issues. Senator Norton (current and regulatory issues that affect many
Ribbon Panel on Transportation chairman of the SLF) proposed a bill plaruling activities. For more
in the 19971egislative session, SB97- information, contact Jodi Asarch or
The Colorado Transportation 113, which would create the State- Kate Fay at the Office of Energy
Network (CTN) has been conducting Local Forum in statute, dedicate staff Conservation, 303-620-4292.
meetings around the state to gather resources, and locate it under the aegis
public opinion on ways to solve of the Legislative Council. It would
Colorado's critical transportation establish a permanent capacity within IRC Recommendation #8-State
needs. CTN's mission is to define a state government to perform in-depth Land Board
transportation funding package for analyses of proposed initiatives, both
consideration in 1997 by either the legislative and citizen-proposed. It The State Trust Lands Initiative
legislature or the voters. Its efforts would have the power to propose (Amendment 16), which passed in
follow Governor Romer's Blue solutions to state=local problems in November 1996, was a citizeri s
Ribbon Panel on Transportation's general. The bill has passed the COlVTg1VUED OlV PAGE 4
THE STATE-LO(AL CONiVECT10N PAGE 3
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 greater. For further information, Unseld at 303-866-2353. This report is
initiative launched in response to this contact K2ithy Kanda at 303-866-3311. accessible via the Smart Growth and
IRC recommendation. The new tools Development web site:
Amendment 16 provides for http://wwwstate.co.us/smartgrowth.
communities, schools and agriculture IRC Recammendation #13-
include:
• creating a Stewardship Trust that Property Rights, Uested Rights,
will preserve future options on ten Intergovernmental Growth Issues jRC Recommendation #17-
percent or 300,000 acres of the state Af fordable Housing
trust lands by managing those Recommendation #13 suggested the
lands for long-terxn productivity by major local government organizations Much action is being taken to address
preserving open space, wildlife (Colorado Municipal League, affordable housing in the state.
habitat and natural values; Colorado Counties, Inc., and Special HB97-1093 has passed third reading
• ensuring that state irust lands are District Association), in consultation in the House and is scheduled for
managed consistent with local land with other interested groups as hearing in the Senate Local
use plans and visions; identified by the Governor, convene a Government Committee. This bill
• prohibiting development on state panel to consider potential includes affordable housing as an
trust lands when the cost of the mechanisms to resolve problems element in a local government's
resulting increases in school related to local government boundary master plan. The Division of
enrollment would exceed projected changes, the creation of new units of Housing's multifamily vacancy and
revenue gains; local government, and development rental survey continues to report tight
• providing direct benefits to public related disputes. In the 1996 rental markets throughout the state.
education by making state trust legislative session, the Governor The average vacancy is 3% statewide.
lands available for school building vetoed three bills related to the issues Steps have been taken by the U.S.
sites and outdoor education addressed in this report, SB96-69 Department of Housing and Urban
purposes; and (Property Rights), HB96-1358 Development to streamline their
~ providing lease rates and other (Municipa.l Annexation) and HB96- review process for committing
incentives to agricultural lessees for 1303 (Vested Rights). In his veto mortgage insurance for apartment
good stewardship practices. messages on these bills, the Governor construction. Following the
again asked the local government recommendations of Smart Growth to
A widespread misconception about associations to jointly with him streamline financing policies
Amendment 16 is that it will result in convene a panel to address the employed by federal housing
the loss of revenue to schools. All "issues re]ated to the interaction of agencies, HCJD reduced the time in
existing surface and mineral leases private property owners, developers half for the review and approval
remain in effect. Sales of trust lands and local governments." period of mortgage insurance.
without replacing them to maintain
the board's total land base are The panel met during the fall of 1996 Federal agencies have been asked to
discouraged to make sure that future and issued a report in January 1997. prepare an inventory of land that may
generations can continue to benefit The reporr contains issue statements, have development potential and
from the trust. Existing uses of state recommended policies and could be transferred for other parcels
trust 1_ands (e.g., grazing, crop procedures, and "best practices" of land, or leased for development.
production, inining, oil/gas recommendations on these issues. The Division of Housing will publish
extraction) are not precluded on lands Additionally, examples of actual by Apri11997 a guidebook on actions
enrolled in the Stewardship Trust. documents (resolutions, ordinances, local governments can take to
This assures that these lands may regulations, etc.) were collected to promote the development of
continue to generate revenue for illustrate recommendations. The affordable housing. The Joint Budget
public education, while preserving panel's focus on "best practices" Committee denied a budget request
community stability by allowing the recommerldations reflected its hope from the Deparhnent of Local Affairs
continued operation of those that these, if widely followed, would for 1998 to include $10 million for
industries that are important to local lead to reduced conflict over development of affordable housing.
economies. Uses of state trust development related disputes. The The Division of Housing continues to
lands-including use as school panel alsa agreed that a concerted work on this program and will
building sites or preservation as open effort of education and technical resubmit a budget proposal in 1998
space-will require compensation. assistance, aimed at local for the following year. For further
This removes the requirement that governments and constituents of information, contact Tom Hart at
revenue be maxunized in every groups represented on the panel, 303-866-2033.
instance to assure that we do not could do much to alleviate the types
allow a mandate for short-term of conflicts that have often led to
revenue gains to foreclose future proposed legislative solutions. For
opportunities-which may be even further information, contact Charlie
PAGE 4 THE STATE-LOCAL CONNE(TION.
PREPARING FOR THE 2000 CENSUS ~~W REsIDENTIAL
AssEss~~~ TE
For more than a year, the Division of achieving a complete enumeration at
Local Government has been woxking the time of the census. The Division 1997 is a reappraisal year in all 63
with counties and municipalities to expects the Census Bureau to allow counties. Property values will be
prepare for the 2000 Census. The local governments to play a lead role brought up to the 19961eve1 of value,
effort has two objectives. The first is in both the hiring of enumerators and based on 1995 through June 30,1996
to assist the Census Bureau in the promoting of the census in their sales data. The Colorado Constitution
constructing the local infrastructure respective areas. requires a recalculation of the
necessary to achieve a good count. residential rate. The Division of
The second is to help assure that the Last autumn, the Division worked Property Taxation has conducted a Bureau defines block, census tract, with all counties in suggesting the county by county projection based on
and municipal boundaries so that the block boundaries to be used in the information provided by assessors.
Census geography is appropriate for census. These (block) boundaries will The estimated residential rate was
state and local uses, including the serve as the framework far census established at 9.71% for the 1997-1998
tabulation of data by voting precincts. tract boundaries, which will be assessment years.
defined with local participation next
Three steps are necessary to achieve suminer. The Division will be helping Senate Bill 97-26 was introduced and
the first objective of getting a good Iocal governments insure that the has passed the Senate. As of this
count. The first is insuring that the Census Bureau has accurate writing, the bill will be heard in the
Census Bureau has a complete and municipal boundaries including all House Finance Committee and held in
accurate map with unique names on annexations up to the time of the 2000 abeyance until April, while the
all streets or roads, and address enumeration. Division of Property Taxation reviews
ranges on all block faces or road more current information based on the
segments where there are houses. The Division has prepared a detailed values that will be sent out to the
This work needs to be completed this memorandum defining the steps local taxpayers by May 1,1997. If necessary,
calendar year. The second step is the governments can take to prepare for the rate will be adjusted based on the
development of a complete list of the 2000 Census. For a copy, con#act new information.
houses by physical address. The the Demography Section, Coloraao
Division will be helping county Division of Local Government,1313 For more information, contact Michael
assessors and others prepare these Sherman Street, Room 521, Denver, Schuster at the Division of Property
lists for the Census Bureau over the CO 80203 or use the Reply Form in Taxation, (303) 866-2371.
next two years. The last step is this newsletter.
THlE STATIE°IC,OCAIL CONNECTION RIEPLY FOR1~/IJ
Name: Phone:
Address:
street/p.o box city zip
Jurisdiction / Representing:
Suggestions for Future Issues of the Connection:
Please note any other comments you may have:
Please Check any of the following which apply:
? PLEASE MAIL A COPY OF THE TABOR, GALLAGHER AND MILL LEVIES: ARE LOCAL REVENUES BEING SHORTCHANDED?
? PLEASE MAIL A COPY OF SB97-113
? PLEASE MAIL A COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM DEFINING THE STEPS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAIV TAKE TO PREPARE FOR
THE 2000 CENSUS
Send this form to:
Colorado Division of Local Government
1313 Sherman Street, Room 521
Denver, Colorado 80203
Inquiries can be directed to the Division of Local Government 303/866-2156
THE STATE-LOCAI CONNE(TION PAGE 5
ILLEGALLY-DUMPED from the $1 Waste Tire Recycling applications for grant money.
Development Fee (25-17-202, C.R.S.) Although there are limited funds .
WASTE TIRES which persons who leave used tires available and large projects in many
with dealers must pay. counties, DOLA intends to grant as
The Colorado General Assembly much money as quickly as possible.
established the Colorado Waste Tire As of March 1,1997, El Paso County
Cleanup Grant Program and Fund in was the anly county to have received a If you are interested in learning more
1995, to begin July 1,1996, for the grant under this program. That grant about this program, you may contact
purpose of helping counties pay the was for $150,000 and has already either Laura Belsten, Program
expenses of removing and aided in the cleanup of one of four Admuustrator, 303-871-3942, or David
transporling illegally-disposed waste designated sites. Metsch, Program Coordinator, 303-
tires to legal recycling facilities or 866-3005.
pther counties have approached the
landfills (24-32-114, C.R.SJ. The Deparhnent of Local Affairs with
revenue for the program is derived
~
b
, ~ ~ C~~ a
~ BULK ~
U.S. Pj ~ ~ g ,
TeChniCal A~sesi~nCe DENEP,T&
The State-Local Connection PERMIJ NO. 73ES~
Published by the Division of Local Government
1313 Sherman St., Room 521
Denver, Colorado 80203
Telephone: (303) 866-2156
Fax: (303) 866-4819
o . (F.
m
w~
~ - - - - - , .
~ A v a~ 0%ol ~
; Town of Vail r1r c~~ ~
Attn: Pam Brandmeyer
~ 75 S. Frontage Rd. ~ N
i Vail, Colorado 657 -i
~ ~QLd1fLU AFR d
- - - - - ~ ~ ~ r ~
' _TPkNpxd*qA1*,~
f
~
. _ - . -a _
it lo ~k~
l n acronym-happy Washington, it has been a key source of funding for was fortunate that the landmark regions such as Denver that ,do no1991 Intermodal Surface Trans- meet Clean Air Act mandates. portation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) Finally, the house-passed version
was quickly rechristened,as a more the STEP 21 proposal, HR 674, elimi="' unit pronounceable "ice tea." After more nates thes xiSro° am. While this p o=-
- - than five years and $100 billion in fed- hancementp~'
- ' - eral transportation spending, ISTEA gram has taken just 2. percent of all
has proven to be a savory beverage in- ISTEA funds, it has enabled thousands F:..
deed for states such as Colorado that ~ of local projects for bicycle paths. r.,:
are hard-pressed to upgrade their Pedestrian trails for both commutin4g:~;~ •i-.
-
overburdened transportation systems. and recreation - and has boosted the
Local governments have been par- econo ocesshbydd awingnreclreati nal
ticularly supnortive of ISTEA because the p
it gave them an unprecedented flexi- enthusiasts to such communities.
bility to tailor their share of federal Happily, Colorado Gov. Roy Romer
dollars to local needs rather, than has helped organize 15 state governors
march to bureaucratic drums in Wash- into a coalition called ISTEA Works to . gton or their state capitols. ISTEA is fight for reauthorization of the exist- "
up for reauthorization in Congress this ing law basically intact. One obvious.;.. ,
~ year and, despite its popularity, faces advantage of the version backed by. .
v at least two serious challenges from Romer is that it puts more federal dol-:;;; .
special interest groups angered bY _ which use fo~mulas that tend to sphon,,__. :.that very flexibility. away from Western states.
One alternative, dubbed HOTEA for moneY
"highways only" would slash local Additionallythe ISTEA Works Plan,
funding and pour practically every- also backed by the Clinton administra~~:
~ r` =3,
thing into highway construction and tion, maintains the strong partnership
~ maintenance. HOTEA is a beverage with local government forged by-the;
brewed for the exclusive quaffing of original ISTEA, the federal commit=:`,:? highway contractors and, justifiably, ment to-rapid transit, and crucial.air;~;
V`
isions of CMAQ an.com.
.
. , :
has little support in Congress. quality prov
v , _
' . : ' '
~v A more serious rival to ISTEA is la- munity enhancement programs
_ beled "Step 21." It would gut several In short, ISTEA Works not only~~ ,
' key provisions of the existing law, re- brings more money into Colorado, it.j., : ~
stricting the flow of funds to metropol- gives Coloradans more control over'-
anning organiaations lil~e'the how that money is spent. We urge Sen:T'
itan pl r"+
Denver Regional Council of Govern- Wayne Allard, who sits on the key En~'_Y~ '
ments or the Pikes Peak Area COG. vironment and Pnblic Works Commit-'--
~ STEP , 21 would also sharply reduce tee, to fight for.this Colorado-friendiy',,'~-_
~ the Congestion Mitigation and Air version of the ISTEA law when
Quality Improvement Program that committee takes up the measure.
"
~
S-FuJ-rz & MHLLF-us
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
THE BRIND MANSION CROSSROAOS MALL, SUITE 498
R. GREGORY STUTZ 825 LOGAN STREET 143 EAST {V9EADOW DRIVE
CHARLES A. NIILLER DENVER, COLORADO 80203-3114 VAlL, COLORADO 81657
PAUL G. ITRTZ TELEPHONE (303) 861-1200 TELEPHONE (970) 476-5800
JOHN M. MARTIN FACSIMILE (303) 830-09 15 FACSIMILE (970) 476-5277
April 15, 1997 S2090/6
Town,Council Hand Deliverv •
Town Of Vail.
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Ree Austria Haus Special Development District
Dear Council Membersa
On behalf of our clients, Riverhouse Condominium Association,
Summers Lodge Condominium Association and Edelweiss Lodge
Condominium Association, we want to advise the Council of certain
objections to the proposed terms of the above S.D.D. Our principal
concern has to do with the effort being made to advance the so-
called Streamwalk Project by (i) stifling the opposition of the
Austria Haus applicant, and (ii) conditioning approval of the
Austria Haus S.D.D. on a non-remonstrance provisiono
The Associations have long made known their opposition to the
Streamwalk Project and urge you to refrain from any further action
promoting something that is nothing more than a pet project of the
Town's plannerse There are covenants which have been in effect for
many years and which were designed to preserve the open space
character of the area along Gore Creeke These covenants prohibit
any sort of improvement in the area, including sidewalks and paths
which are likely to intrude upon the privacy of adjacent property
ownerso -Those property owners in many instances acquired their
- residential units in reliance on covenants which were designed to
protect their privacye
We also have objections to the Streamwalk Project based upon
environmental concernso Rather than seeking to increase the impact
of people upon this area, we would urge you to consider taking
appropriate action to return the area along Gore Creek to its
natural stateo There are ample pedestrian sidewalks, walkways and
paths in the Vail area and it is not necessary to try to force
another walkway into an area of limited spacee
Representatives of other property owner associations have gone into
greater detail than this letter in setting forth the many sound
reasons for not proceeding with the Streamwalk Projecte We will
not repeat in this letter all of the arguments which have been
raised, but we want you to know that we join with the Bishop Park
Town Council S2090/4
Town Of Vail
April 15, 1997
Page 2
Homeowners Association, The Village Center Condominium Association,
The East Village Homeowners Association, other associations and
persons in opposing the Streamwalk Project.
- Please respect thlle property rights of the members of" our Association and other affected property owners by not tying the
, Austria Haus S.D.D. to the Streamwalk Project.
Your XSt-ul
R.
z
z
RGS/s
cc: Riverhouse Condominium Assn, c/o Mr. Fraser M. Horn
Summers Lodge Condominium Association
Edelweiss Lodge Condominium Association
Bishop Park Homeowners Assn., c/o Michael W. Standard, Esq.
Village Center Condominium Assn., c/o Richard P. Rosen, Esq.
• - - ~ ~ ~C (~e,~-
~
~
~
~
VERMONT BICYCLE TOURING • HIKING HOLIDAYS • TRAVENT INTERNATIONAL
H.A. lTTLESON, CNAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
April 10, 1997
Bob Armour, Mayor
2668-A Arosa Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Bob:
I apologize for the delay in writing you after the first Sonnealp Austria Haus
hearing. As you may recall, I spoke to the issue with special reservations on
two particular items namely, the fact that the present setbacks should be
retained from the Creek in order to leave open space in that area which I
think is so important to the town itself; and secondly, to object to the
immensity of the building.
As a neighbor in the one instance but as a person who has been coming to Vail
since "day one" (I did the first financing for kitchen equipment in the Lodge
and at Mid Vail). I feel especially attached to Vail. As a matter of fact,
at this point I am even looking to purchase another piece of property in the
area. It is for this reason that I feel so strongly about the way tlie
Sonnealp rede.velopment has been handled.
In one instance, I completely agree and support wholeheartedly, as a matter of
fact, a redevelopment of the property. The Sonnealp owners have been strong
advocates of Vail and their hotels have been first class institutions. They
deserve a better presence than they have at this time. However, as is very
often the case, excess has prevailed over aesthetics and common sense, in my
opinion. It is simply inconceivable to me that the project should not be
closer to the road, as this provides better access to the retail
establishments and still leaves plenty of open space on that side.
Conversely, Gore Creek is so integral to the fabric of Vail that we simply
can't afford to allow that space to be infringed upon.
The size of this entire project is immense by any measure. Perhaps more
importantly, the use of a special development district has been taken to the
absolute extreme, not by you as the Mayor or the Council members, but by
staff. I don't personally have objections to special development districts
for particular purposes but I do feel that to violate zoning by almost 100$ by
the use of a special development district, when it is totally unnecessary, is
carrying things too far and sets completely the wrong precedent.
695 MADISON AVENUE, SIXTEENTH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10022 USA 212.838.7557 • FAX: 212.751.2485
REC1'C(ffIP.IPEP
. a~
Mr. Bob Armour
Page Two
April 10, 1997
I feel that it is the job of the Town Council to stand up and be counted and
make that point. A beautiful new edifice can be built. It can be built
sensibly, it does not have to be small and it can be built to leave the
existing open space between the Creek and the rear of the structure:
A major point made at the first reading was the manner in which.this entire
project went through the staff and then to the Town Council. It is blatantly
ridiculous to expect a group of dedicated Council members to look at a project
of this magnitude for such a short time and be expected to opine with
finality.. The process is wrong and that should be.changed, but until it is
changed it is'so very impo"rtant that you, the Council members, make the
decisions, not the staff. _
I'm sorry to say that I can't be there for.the second reading on April 15 but
2 urge you to stick by your guns with the conditions that were set forth
initially and force the project to leave its present setback from the Creek
and reduce at least somewhat in size.
Thanks for your consideration and attention to this. Sincerely, •
l
HAI:sr
/ . , .
r
v
~CU-&~~l5•47
XC~ aZ,
30 West Ridge Court
Parachute, Co 81635
Iipril 13, 1997
PIr. raul R. Jolinston
3G_'1 L. Lanson nanciz .--Zoac. ~1 •
vail, Colorado
R.e: Truck rar:;ing and Loc.gc at ~ail Exchanq(-: Site
Dear Mr. Johnston .
:1y w.ife and 1" have o~:-ned a conuominium in TI?e Taillo%-s s?nce
its inception in 1°70e our unit faces the mountain so we
hear all the traffic noise on Vail roade over the past five
years the traffic noise has increased each year to where it
is no longer possible to sleep past seven in the morninq.
we understand that, cven though the present zoning prohitits
it, t:ze toivn staff is considering the Lodge at Vail Exchange
Site as a location for a truck terminal as a means of solving
the truck parking problem in the CC1 area.
We submit that locating a trucking terminal at this location is
the poorest possible choice as it would increase congestion,
increase noise (probably starting much earlier than seven AN!)
to us in The Willows as well as those in The Lodge Towers, Riva
Ridge South, 44 Willow Place, the private homes on Vail and
Forrest roads, The Sonnenalp, I~oliday Inn, and otliers on ~'ail roade
The building owners housing the stores and restaurants which
require the truck deliveries need to modify their buildings to
accept truck traffic or come up with solutions that do not de-
crease the property values of nearby residents such as ourselves.
One pos.si-ble solution would be to modify part of the main parking
structure into a trucking termina.l. Some advantages that come to
mind are: sliorter distances for both large trucks as well as
delivery vans to travel; fee;er bedrooms passed; and I would guess
lower costs over a terminal located on the Erchange Site.
We ask that when the request for rezoning of the Exchange Site
comes up that you vote against it. If however it should pass we
request you vote against locating a truck terminal in any building
built thereon.
I-7e are retired and willing to serve on a citizens committee to
work on an equitable solution to this problem. If you think I
could be helpful please contact me at the above address or thru
Barbara Feeney at The Willows. (476-2231)
Thank yo.u for jvour timc.
Sincerely =
- / ~
lank anc, :;ary Lou Caldwel~