HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-02-24 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1998
2:00 P.M. AT TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to
determine at what time Council wiii consider an item.
1. Jim Spell - 20 Year Anniversary. (5 mins.)
2. PEC/DRB Review. (30 mins.)
3. The proposed Seibert Circle design has been approved by DRB. Council
Larry Grafel will re-discuss:
Nancy Sweeney A. Options re: the periphery of the project.
Todd Oppenheimer B. Where do the additional moneys come from to cover the overall
project shortfall? Shortfall in funding will be discussed in the
overall context of funding currently allocated for all Village capital
projects (spring/summer'98).
C. Approve release of $30,000 to order granite - Morales.
D. Project schedule.
E. Approve to proceed with negotiations with a contractor. (TBD)
(1 hr.)
4. Discussion of community engagement process for developing a
Russell Forrest dedicated funding source for housing and identifying land opportunities
Suzanne Silverthorn for future parks and recreation, community facilities, and housing.
Andy Knudtsen (30 mins).
Todd Oppenheimer
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review and decide on 1 of the 4
options presented at the February 17th work session to develop a
dedicated funding source for housing and identify land opportunities for
housing, parks, open space, and other community facilities.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town Council has identified the
creation of a dedicated funding source for housing as a high priority
action. In addition, the Town has the need to identify land opportunities
for housing, parks, open space, and other community facilities. At the
February 17th, Council work session, staff presented 4 options for
achieving the Council's goals related to housing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Implement Option 1.
5. 1998 TOV Gommunity Survey. (30 mins.)
Bob McLaurin
Suzanne Silverthorn ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Clarify direction regarding format
and distribution of 1998 TOV Community Survey.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: At the conclusion of the 1997 TOV
Community Survey process, there was some discussion with Council
regarding an every-other-year approach that would eventually fa!l in line
with the biennial budget cycle. At the time, there also was some
discussion about doing a telephone survey in the off year to reduce costs.
Currently, there is interest on behalf of the staff to survey the community
on topics related to the public process for housing, public facilities, open
space and parks, as well as TOV service ratings and other Council-
directed questions. The 1998 budget enables a full-blown survey to be
undertaken at a cost of $23,000, if so directed by the Town Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a full-blown mail-back survey
approach that would include the topics listed above, plus service ratings
and other Council-directed questions.
6. The Mountain Haus is requesting the Town Council's permission to
George Ruther proceed through the public process. The Town Council's permission is
required as the Mountain Haus is proposing to construct a new entry on
the west end of the building that encroaches upon Town land in Slifer
Plaza. Stephanie Lord, representing the Mountain Haus. (10 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions,
or deny the request to proceed through the public process. An approval
of this request is not an approval of the new entry addition.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: As part of the anticipated improvements to
Slifer Plaza, the Mountain Haus would like to upgrade their west entry, as
the entry is dated and out of scale with the existing building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department
staff recommends that the Town Council approve the Mountain Haus'
request to proceed through the public process.
7. Discussion of Council Health Care Benefit. (30 mins.)
Bob McLaurin
John Power BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Council has requested to review Health
care benefit options. Attached is Colorado Municipal League
comparative data.
8. Information Update. (10 mins.)
9• Council Reports. (10 mins.)
10. Other. (10 mins.)
11. Executive Session - Personnel Matters. (20 mins.)
12. Adjournment - 6:05 p.m.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
I I I I I I I
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/3/98, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/10/98, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 313198, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
I I I I I I I
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice
or 479-2356 TDD for information.
C~V+.GENDA.WS
2
COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP
TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
1998 LARRY/GREG H.: With the increased speed from the Main At the time of the construction of the main Vail roundabout, this issue was
2117/98 CROSSWALK Vail roundabout pouring westbound on South Frontage discussed. Lines can be painted. Staff will revisit.
Sybill Navas Road, should a crosswalk be painted to help draw drivers'
attention to the fact pedestrians are crossing from the police
department to the Holiday Inn side of the Frontage Road.
February 19, 1998; , Page 1
Updated 2/24/98 9am
PLANNtNG AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Monday, February 23, 1998
FINAL AGENDA
Project Orientation /NO LUNCH - Community Development Department 1:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT ,
Greg Moffet
Greg Amsden
Galen Aasland
Gene Uselton
Diane Golden
John Schofield
Ann Bishop
Site Visits : 1:30 pm
1. Spraddle Creek - 914 Spraddle Creek Road
Driver: George
f'~, r::
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearing - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a minor subdivision, to modify a platted building envelope, to allow for a
maintenance structure to be constructed adjacent to the caretaker residence, located at 914
Spraddle Creek Road/Tract C, Spraddle Creek Estates.
Applicant: Spraddle Creek Estates Maintenance Association, represented by David Argo
Planner: Reed Onate
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Greg Amsden VOTE: 7-0
APPROVED
2. A request for a conditional use permit, to altow for four (4) additional offices and one (1)
meeting room to accommodate the VRD sports staff, located at the Vail Tennis Center,
700 South Frontage Road East/Ford Park.
Applicant: Michael Ortiz, Vail Recreation District
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-2 (Gene Uselton
and John Schofield opposed)
1 *YAR
T019
Updated 2/24/98 9am
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. That no parking spaces be reserved for VRD use only.
2. That staff consider a letter of intent of the VRD's financial commitment for future
parking space improvements and that the VRD redefine their position on parking
in Ford Park.
3. A worksession to discuss a variety of alternatives, based upon different philosophies and
methodologies, which defines the allowable building height and general massing in the
Lionshead Redevelopment study area.
Planners: Mike Mollica/Dominic Mauriello
This item will be a joint worksession with the Town Council on March 3, 1998 at 2:00
p. m.
4. A request for additonal GRFA utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for a remodel, located
at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Nate Accardo, represented by Dale Smith, Fritzlen, Pierce Briner Architects
Planner: Reed Onate
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 9, 1998
5. A request for a conditional use permit to construct four multiple-family dwelling units and
variances from Section 12-7E-8 (Building Height), Section 12-7E-11 (Landscape Area) and
Section 12-7E-7 (Setbacks), to allow for commercial and residential expansion, located at 143
E. Meadow Drive (Crossroads East Building) / Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st.
Applicant: Crossroads Plaza, Trevina L.P., represented by Biil Pierce
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 23, 1998
6. A request for a density variance from Section 12-713-13, to allow for the construction of a two-
bedroom dwelling unit, located at 227 Wall Street (Hong Kong)/Lot B& C, Block 5C, Vail Village
1 st Filing.
Applicant: ASI Vail Land Holding, L.L.C., c/o Base Mountain Sports - Brett Barnett,
represented by Kathy Langenwalter
Planner: George Ruther
WITHDRAWN
7. A request for a setback variance, to allow for a revised parking lot, located at 4192 Spruce
Way/Lot 5, Block 7, Bighorn 3rd Addition.
Applicant: Altair Vail Inn, c/o Mary Herzig, represented by Prudential Gore Range
Properties.
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
WITHDRAWN
2
Updated 2/24/98 9am
8. Information Update
9. Approval of February 9, 1998 minutes.
The applications and informafion about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the project plannePs office located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for
information.
Community Development Department
3
r
Updated 2/19/98 1 pm
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Monday, February 23, 1998
AGENDA
Project Orientation /NO LUNCH - Community Development Department 1:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits : 1:30 pm
1. Spraddle Creek - 914 Spraddle Creek Road
Driver: George
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearina - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a minor subdivision, to modify a platted building envelope, to allow for a
maintenance structure to be constructed adjacent to the caretaker residence, located at 914
Spraddle Creek Road/Tract C, Spraddle Creek Estates.
Applicant: Spraddle Creek Estates Maintenance Association, represented by David Argo
Planner: Reed Onate
2. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for four (4) additional offices and one (1)
meeting room to accommodate the VRD sports staff, located at the Vail Tennis Center,
, 700 South Frontage Road East/Ford Park.
Applicant: Michael Ortiz, Vail Recreation District
Planner: George Ruther
3. A worksession to discuss a variety of alternatives, based upon different philosophies and
methodologies, which defines the allowable building height and general massing in the
Lionshead Redevelopment study area.
Planners: Mike MollicalDominic-Mauriello
This item will be a joint worksession with the Town Council on March 3, 1998 at 2:00
p.m.
1 -
*VAR
TOWN
Updated 2/19/98 1 pm
4. A request for additonal GRFA utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for a remodel, located
at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Nate Accardo, represented by Dale Smith, Fritzlen, Pierce Briner Architects
Planner: Reed Onate
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 9, 1998
5. A request for a conditional use permit to construct four multiple-family dwelling units and
variances from Section 12-7E-8 (Building Height), Section 12-7E-11 (Landscape Area) and
Section 12-7E-7 (Setbacks), to allow for commercial and residential expansion, located at 143
E. Meadow Drive (Crossroads East Building) / Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st.
Applicant: Crossroads Plaza, Trevina L.P., represented by Bill Pierce
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 23, 1998
6. A request for a density variance from Section 12-76-13, to allow for the construction of a two-
bedroom dwelling unit, located at 227 Wall Street (Hong Kong)/Lot B& C, Block 5C, Vail Village
1 st Filing.
Applicant: ASI Vail Land Holding, L.L.C., c/o Base Mountain Sports - Brett Barnett,
represented by Kathy Langenwalter
Planner: George Ruther
WITHDRAWN
7. A request for a setback variance, to allow for a revised parking lot, located at 4192 Spruce
Way/Lot 5, Block 7, Bighorn 3rd Addition.
Applicant: Altair Vail Inn, c/o Mary Herzig, represented by Prudential Gore Range
Properties.
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
WITHDRAWN
8. (nformation Update
9. Approval of February 9, 1998 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for
information.
Community Development Department
Published February 20, 1998 in the Vail Trail.
2
Agenda last revised 2/19/98 5pm
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, February 18, 1998
3:00 P.M.
PROJECT ORIENTATION / NO LUNCH - Community Development Department 2:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Brent Alm
Ted Hingst
Clark Brittain
Bill Pierce
John Schofield (PEC)
SITE VISITS 2:30 pm
1. Nunez - 1457 Vail Valley Drive
Driver: Christie
, PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm
1. Blandford residence - Final review of a new single family home. Reed
1798 Alpine/Lot 13, Vail Village West 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Sidney Blandford
MOTION: Ted Hingst SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the design of the retaining walls and the staging plan be worked out with staff before a
building permit is issued.
2. Nunez Residence - New single family. ChristiE
1457 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 8, Block 3, Vail Valley First Filing.
Applicant: Michael and Deborah Nunez, represented by David Haase Associates
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Ted Hingst VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. That the fence along the lower edge of the yard be removed.
2. That the stucco color be lightened to provide more contrast between the trim and the stucco.
3. Town of Vail - A final review regarding Slifer Plaza. George'
Public Right-of-Vt/ay at the intersection of Bridge St:-and-EastaVleadow Dr. Todd
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer
MOTION: Ted Hingst SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That a visual/physical connection from the Transportation Center to the
plaza be included. TOWN *VAIL
1
i
4. Town of Vail - Final review of newspaper box enclosures. George/
Applicant: Town of Vail Todd
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Ted Hingst VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. That the boxes accommodate changes in the grade.
2. That there be protective trim on the bases.
5. Town of Vail Seibert Circle - Final review of plan. Dominic
Public Right-of-Way intersection of Bridge St. and Hanson Ranch Rd.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Design Workshop, and Nancy Sweeney
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Clark Brittain VOTE: 5-0
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DESIGN CONCEPT WITH 3 CONDITIONS:
1. Look at position of the "fish" element.
2. Strongly encouraged to address the outside edges on private property in the plaza
(edge to edge treatment).
3. Address the provision of bike and ski racks outside of the plaza area.
Staff Approvals
Vaii Realty Rental Management - Window addition. Kathleen
302 Hanson Ranch Road/Block 5-A, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: B.B.&C. Partnership
Artesia Fine Arts Gallery - Awning application. Kathleen
232 Wall StreeUBridge Street Building.
Applicant: Paul Gutowski
Gore Creek Grille - Sign application. Kathleen
223 Gore Creek Drive/Creekside Condominium
Applicant: Michael Ditch
Dowdle residence - Deck and fire door addition. Christie
1592 Golf Terrace #60/Golf Course Townhomes, Sunburst Filing #3.
Applicant: Stephen and Nancy Dowdle
Lane residence - Interior remodel. Kathleen/
2705 Bald Mountain/Lot 7, Block 2, Vail Village 13th Filing. Christie
Applicant: William Lane
Vail Lionshead Real Estate - Awning application. Kathleen
531 E. Lionshead Mall/
Applicant: Bob Lazier
Vail `99 Countdown Clock - Sign application. Kathleen
292 E. Meadow Drive/Mountain Haus.
Applicant: Vail Valley Foundation
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or
479-2356 TDD for information.
2
4VAIL
TOWN O1309 Yail Yalley Drive Department of Public Works & Transportation
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2158 / Fax 970-479-2166
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
FROM: Larry, af , irector of Public Works & Transportation
fr
RE: Seibert Circle Project
DATE: February 20, 1998
At last Tuesday's town council meeting, you requested that we re-discuss the Seibert
Circle project. As a result of that request, we will be presenting to you at next Tuesday's
work session the following:
• Results of the Design Review Board approval and design comments.
• We will discuss the importance of the periphery expansion in respect to the
overall design.
• We will review the approved 1998 project budget.
• We will review the increased project costs and the subsequent budget
shortfalls.
• We will discuss the potential source(s) of additional money, specifically:
• Cost sharing.
• Fundraising.
• Financing of the Pete Seibert statue.
• Comparison with other 1998 Capital Projects.
• Project construction schedule
In regard to and as a result of the discussion outlined above, we are requesting that you
make the following decisions:
1. Should the project extend onto private property?
• If the answer is yes;
• Should the property owner pay for all, a portion of, or none of the construction,
maintenance and operational costs associated with the project?
• If the answer is no, do we proceed with the project within the public right of way?
RECYCLED PAPER
2. Does the Pete Seibert sculpture remain a part of the project even though it is
unfunded?
• If the answer is yes;
• Who finances it?
• If the answer is no, does the project proceed without it?
I have also included a copy of the current project budget, that includes the unfunded
costs associated with the project expansion and Pete Seibert sculpture. This is provided
for your information, review, and preparation for our further discussion about this project
on Tuesday.
SEIBERT CIRCLE STREETSCAPE/AIPP PROJECT
BUDGET UPDATE
February 20, 1998
1998 Beginning Project Budget: $ 615,787
Expenditures to date
For schematic design 11,287>
Budget remaining $ 604,500
Increased Project Costs for:
Peripheral Pavement Additions $ 107,100
Project design, and inflation 21,669
$ 128,769 $ 128,769 (unfunded)
REVISED PROJECT COST $ 733,269
Pete Seibert statue cost: $ 66,000 (Unfunded)
GRAND TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 799,269
u
~y
TOWN OF VAIL
~
Office of the Town Manager
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657 . . • . . .
970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157
TM
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager
DATE: February 20, 1998
RE: Community Engagement Process
Attached to this memorandum is a recap of the four options under consideration for advancing our
housing goals with funding and siting decisions, as well as other community needs.
We continue to recommend option 1, as we believe it is the most viable mechanism to maintain
momentum and involve the public. It is, indeed, a"fast track" effort and will involve a significant
amount of time and commitment on behalf of the Town Council and the public.
Our preliminary estimate for the cost of option 1 is $175,000. This breaks down into 3 areas:
Land Use & Site Planning Services, Plus Map Production $74,000
Financial Expertise for the Housing Funding Component $10,000
Communications & Citizen Involvement $81,000
Contingency $10,000
Total $175,000
My recommendation for funding this is as follows:
$80,000 from the 98 housing fund
$75,000 from 98 RETT funds
$20,000 from 97 carryover from Vail Tomorrow budget
Please review the assumptions and implications of each of the options carefully. We'll be prepared
to talk it through on Tuesday. If you have questions or need additional information prior to
Tuesday's meeting, please don°t hesitate to call me.
RWM/aw
attachments
RECYCLED PAPER
DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS
Option 1: 4 Month Planning Process
Product: This option would provide two products: 1) an estimated funding level needed
for housing and rational for that funding level; and 2) a land opportunities map that would
identify properties appropriate for housing, parks, open space, and other public facilities.
The land opportunities map would be developed after receiving public input on
community needs and criteria for identifying properties for different uses (e.g., size of lot,
proximity to bus stop, slope, ownership, adjacent land use, wetlands).
Implications: * Provides a fair, open, honest public process that would take advantage
of the momentum that exists to create housing. '
* The plan resulting from option 1 will support future decisions Council will
make on housing or other land use issues. This will significantly expedite
future decisions on housing, open space, and public facilities. However,
community understanding and buy-in could be reduced when compared to
a longer process.
*Assumptions: TOV housing role is not subject to community debate: it's a
given
* Assumption: TOV housing goal of having 62% of TOV employees living
in the Town is a goal that is not subject to community debate.
* Funding levels would be an estimate of future housing needs. In the
time frame available, staff can prepare a number of different scenarios for
funding needs which may include private partnerships. Keep in mind that
the target funding level would only be a rough estimate of what is needed.
* This process would examine all potential funding sources and
recommend alternative funding methods to achieve the Town of Vail
housing goals. It is not a given that RETT will be the primary funding
source.
* Assumptions: To ensure the integrity of the process the Town must wait
until July to initiate the next housing project (i.e., site selection, RFPs, etc).
People will question the value of their input if a project is initiated in the
middle of this process.
Option 2: 12 Month Planning Process
Product: Option two would provide a complete action plan on housing, open space and
other public facility land needs. This product would identify specific land that would
achieve the Towns goals. In other words, if the Town had a goal of 1000 more beds, this
process would identify what lands would be needed, how many units could be built on
each property, funding partners, and the costs based on estimated construction costs
and potential revenues. This product would provide a much more accurate
recommendation, compared to option 1, regarding a permanent funding source for
housing and a land opportunities map.
Implications:
* Would provide a fair, open, and honest process.
* The plan resulting from option 2 will provide greater support for future decisions,
compared to option 1, that Council will make on housing or other land use issues.
This will significantly expedite future decisions on housing, particularly those that
involve bond issuance.
* TOVs role and goals for housing would be open for public debate and provide
time for consensus building. Therefore, community understanding and buy-in is
increased when compared to a shorter process.
* Provides a stronger platform, compared to options 1, for future decision making
by having clearly articulated needs and a specific plan of how to meet those
needs.
* Assumptions: To ensure the integrity of the process the Town must wait until
February 1999 to initiate the next housing project (i.e., site selection, RFPs, etc).
People will question the value of their input if a project is initiated in the middle of
this process.
" This process would examine all potential funding sources and recommend
alternative funding methods to achieve the Town of Vail housing goals.
* It is not a given that RETT will be the primary funding source.
* Will be perceived as over processing by some residents and business owners.
Option 3: No Citizen Involvement or Process
Product: This would involve identifying the next project and finding funding either with funding
partners or by using available Town funds to construct the project without a structured citizen
involvement process.
Future funding would be determined on a case by case basis.
Implications: * There could be a short term savings by not having to pay for a planning process.
* Finding support for future projects may be difficult since there is limited or no
community involvement.
* Citizen opportunities to respond to Town decisions and express concerns would
be through the regular public hearing process at Council meetings and through
individual contact with Council members.
* This approach is inconsistent with TOV community involvement philosophy and
could result in loss of trust and credibility built over the last two years.
* There would not be an opportunity for public debate on the Town's role and
* Decisions on housing will likely be challenged by the public.
Option 4: Initiate the next project and then implement a 12 month planning process.
Product: Option 4 is similar to 2 with the exception that the Town would pick one project
to build before initiating a public process on funding and siting.
Implications:
* Public may question the Town's interest in public input by initiating a
project first without public involvement.
* Agreement regarding the site for the immediate project may be difficult
to reach with/out some process. There is no readily apparent site for
which consensus already exists.
* The Town's role and goals in housing would become difficult to debate if
precedents are already established at the outset.
* Additional projects would need to wait until February 1998.
Seyuence of Decisions
Option # 1
Goal: To identify a permanent funding source for housing, as well as a siting package for
Vail's housing, parks, public facilities and open space needs by June 30, 1998.
STEP 1 2/8 to 3/23
TOV Determines...
• General estimate of funding needed to accomplish housing goal (see given)
• Inventory of potential sites
• Draft list of criteria to evaluate funding options
• Draft list of criteria to evaluate siting alternatives (2/8 to 3/1)
STEP 2 3/1 to 4/16
Community...
• Identifies community uses and needs
• Generates ideas for funding sources
• Responds to criteria for funding and siting
"Anything that should be a criterion? Anything missing?"
Methods
--Mailed survey 311 to 413
--Interviews
--Combined open house/forum/workshops 4110 to 4116
COMMUNICATE ALL INFORMATION TO DATE
STEP 3 4/20 to 5/22
TOV...
• Applies criteria and identifies funding options
• Applies criteria for siting and develops multiple comprehensive packages of maps
addressing each of the four categories of need
STEP 4 6/1 to 6/8
Community Responds to...
• Funding options
• Siting Alternatives
"What do you like about the options/alternatives and why?"
Methods
--Public Workshops
Option 1 (continued)
STEP 5 6/10
Internal Process "Checkpoint"
(This is an intern.al TOV assessment of the process, to date, to confirm
that the process schedule can be met.)
COMMUNICATE ALL INFORMATION TO DATE
STEP 6 6/8 to 6/12
TOV Develops...
• Final funding package
• Final siting plan
STEP 7 6/12 to 6/25
Community opportunity for...
• Final response
"Here's what you said. Here's what we did. Here's what we're about to do."
Methods
--Newspaper ad
--Informational mailing
STEP 8 6/30
Vail Town Council...
• Acts on funding and siting packages forwarded for action
NEXT STEPS: IMPLEMENTATION PRODUCTS
Sequence of Decisions
Option #2
Goal: To develop a comprehensive financial and siting package for the Town of Vail's
housing, parks, public facilities and open space needs.
STEP 1 2/18 to 3/4
TOV Develops...
0 Problem statement, including time frame, givens, goal, TOV role
STEP 2 3/4 to 3/17
Community...
• Responds, validates problem statement, etc.; TOV revises as necessary
STEP 3 2/18 to 3/20
TOV Determines...
• Criteria
STEP 4 3/20 to 4/27
Community...
• Identifies all possible community uses
STEP 5 6/1 to 6/5
Community...
• Responds to criteria/validates and generates possible uses on maps (sites)
STEP 6 6/ 1 to 9/ 1
TOV...
• Applies siting criteria and generates comprehensive alternative packages for siting and
uses
STEP 7 9/1 to 9/15
Community...
• Responds/validates (week 1)
• Generates funding ideas and funding criteria ideas (week 2)
• TOV synthesizes into 1 siting package
STEP 8 9/22
Council...
• Acts on siting
STEP 9 9/23 to 10/12
Option 2 (continued)
TOV...
• Applies cost and revenue analysis to siting package and develops draft criteria for funding
for housing and all uses
STEP 10 10/12 to 10/16
Community...
• Responds to criteria and validates; TOV revises as necessary
STEP 11 10/16 to 12/31
TOV...
• Applies criteria to develop funding options
STEP 12 1/1 to 1/31
Community...
• Reviews funding options; TOV synthesizes into funding package
STEP 13 2/2
Council...
0 Acts on funding package
.
Town of Vail Community Survey 1997 ;
~
E
The following questions probe certain issues related to the adequacy and performance of the Town of Vail government We would ~
_ appreciate your response to the extent which you are able. Please darken the appropriate circles using blue or black ink or pencil. r
If you have no opinion, or no knowledge of a particular subject, please leave blank or indicate in the appropriate space. Please attach ~
sheet for any additional comments or suggestions. ~
What do you believe are the three biggest issues, in order How do you rate your satisfaction wrth the following services in the ~
of priority, facing the Town of Vail? Town of Vail? ¦
.
1. Not at All Very DonY Know/
PUBLIC WORKS Satlsfied Satisfied No opinion I
Snow removal ~ - - " •
2. Road and street maintentance ¦
(potholes, crack sealing, drainage, etc.) ~ ~ _ ~ , ¦
3 Neighborhood park availability
~ _ _ _ - •
Park playground equipment safety
_ _ ~ ¦
s
, Have you used the bus system within the past 12 months? ¦
Are you aware that the Town has focused attenfion on a citizen ~ Yes No E
participatron program with emphasis on an open, honest and Not at All Very DonY Know/ '
fair process? a THE BUS SYSTEM savstied SatiSfied No Opinion 9
Yes No , Don't know 1 No opinion ~ Frequency of bus service: ¦
l In-town shuttle - - - ¦
Has it made a difference? = Yes ~ No ~ Sandstone route ~ - ¦
Why do you say that? s East Vail route _ ; ¦
West Vail route ¦
Golf Course route ^ ¦
Lionsridge Loop route
~ Ford Park route l •
How satisfied are you, in general, with the overall performance Quality of bus service: _ _ •
of the Town of Vail government? - Bus driver courtesy ¦
NotatAll very ' Dependability of bus service _ _ ¦
sar;stied sarisfied i Cleaniiness of buses ~ •
Current Town Council '7 - ` ~ Cleanliness of Vail Transportation 0
Boards and Commissions 3' Bus Terminal y = _ - .r
Town of Vail staff ~71, (f, ; .
. ~ Have you used public parking within the past 12 months? •
Specifically, over the past year, how would you rate the Yes No ~
responsiveness of the following groups? ~ Not ar aii Very DonY Know/ ~
PARKING Satlsried Satisfied No opinion ~
_ Getting Stayed the Gotten Discount parking program .
eetter Same Worse (debit card/biue, gold pass)
Current Town Council Booth attendant courtesy - - ~ m
_ Boards and Commissions Speed of transaction at exit booth
Town of Vail staff Overall parking feeslpricing structure
And why do you say that? Do any particular departments, ~ The "Park Free After 3"
boards or commissions sfand out in terms of changes you ~ experimental program
have seen, either positive or negative? Do you have specific ; Cleanliness and lighting of ~
~ ~ parking structures
suggestions on how we could be more responsive.
I Comments/suggestions for improvement in any of the above categories: i
i (Please attach sheet if more space is needed for comments.) `
~
~ s
~
~
s
- ~
~
. ~
~ The Communrty Development Deparfinent provides planning, design ~ Have you visited the library within the past 12 months?
~ review, environmental health, and building inspection services. - Yes No
~ Nave you used the Communify Development Department within
~ the past 12 months? Y e s ~ No How satisfied are you with the following services and facilities?
NotatAll Very DonYKnow!
Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of this department. UBRARY Satisfied sadsred No Opinion
~ NotatAll verynon tKnoWi Research information
~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT sarisfed saasfied No op;nion Circulation services
~ Overall service and efficiency O O O Fiction books
~ Courtesy and attitude "3 Nonfiction books
~ Competence and professionalism Cl C ~ Magazines and newspapers
~ Development review process-staff Alternate media including v
71
~ Development review process- videos and books on tape
~ Design Review Board On-line databases
~ Development review process-Plan- _ Youth materials
~ ning & Environmental Commission Youth programs
~ Building permit plan review New library hours 3
~ Buiiding permit turnaround time Comments/suggestions for improvement in the above categories:
~ The walk-in service counter 0 C,
~ Buiiding inspections
~ Restaurant inspection and
~ education program Do you hold a library card in the Town of Vail?
~ Environmental planning program Yes No
~ Comments/suggestions for improvement in the above categories:
~ Do you and your family members feel welcome at the library?
~ Yes ; No ~ Don't know / No opinion
~
~ How do you rate your satisfaction with the following services in the How satisfied are you with the following services and facilities?
~ TownofVail? NotatAll Very DonYKnow/ NotatAll Very DonYKnow/
~ FIRE Satisfied SeNsfied No Opinion TOWN ADMINISTRATION Satisfied Satisfied No opinion
~ Fire protedtion and response time General administration
~ Emergency medical services (manager's office, finance
~ Fire education services department, clerk's office, staff)
m Courtesy and attitude - _ - _ ` Information dissemination
m Fire department plan review (meeting notices, announcements,
m Fire inspection program project updates)
~ Fire code enforcement Municipal Court
~ FRONTAGE ROAD MAINTENANCE Finance/cashier window
~ (provided by the State of Colorado) ~ Z11 Sales tax and business
71
~ ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES (contracted from Eagle County) ; license services
~ Patrols for leash law violations 11:~ ~
~ Response time to complaints C Comments/suggestions for improvement in the above categories:
~ Overall quality of service
~ POLICE ,
~ Overall feeling of safety and security,
Visibility of police fooUvehicle patrol : Since 1980, the Town of Vail has used a one percent real estate
~
~ Friendiiness and approachability of transfer tax (RET~ for the purchase of open space and development
~ Vail police department employees ~ C. C~ ~ ' and maintenance of parks and trails within the Town of Vail.
~ Overall quality of service 71 Would you support maintaining the cunent status OR
~ Overall fairness of police employees expanding the use of this fund for additional needs?
~ Enforcement of traffic regulations _ Maintain ~ Expand ~ Don't know / No opinion
~ (speeding, reckless dnving, DUI, etc.)
~ Comments/suggestions for improvement in the above categories: Specifically, would you support utilizing a portion of RETT revenues
~ to support (MARK ALL THAT APPLY):
~ Acquisition/protection of open space OUTSIDE the Town of Vail
~ Acquisition of locafs housing WITHIN the Town of Vai1
~ List the top three problems or activities you would like the Police Dept. Acquisition of locals housing OUTSIDE the Town of Vail
~ (officers and employees) to spend their fime addressing and performing: Other:
1• Comments/suggestions:
~ 2
~
3.
~
~ ~ ~
Would you supporf complefion of the Town of VaiT Streamwalk along Over the past several years, has the sense of community within ~
Gore Creek from the Covered Bridge to the Vail Interfaith Chapel? the Town improved, gotten worse, or stayed the same?
~ Yes ~No Don't know / No opinion C, Improved Q Stayed the same ~
C~ Gotten worse Q Don't know I No opinion ~
Would you support completion of the Streamwalk from the Covered .E
Bridge to Lionshead? Comments: s
Yes _ No Don't know / No opinion ~
Comments:
~ Over the past year, in which of the following have you participated? ~
(MARK ALL THAT APPLY.) ~
Ford Park Management C; Trees for Vail ~
How satisfied are you with the manner in which loading and delivery ~ Plan meetings Path Clean Up Day ~
is handled af the Norarnn Very DonYKnow/ West Vail Interchange Attend Town Council . ~
present time in: saristied Satisfied No Opinion ~ meetings and/or board and ~
Vail Village Vail Tomorrow meetings commission meetings . ~
Lionshead Lionshead Redevelopment Other: - , ~
If a problem, ptease explain: Master Plan meetings ~
Town of Vail Clean Up Day None .F
~
' Are there other events or acfivities you participate in that make you ~
In your opinion, should the Village Commercial Core (Bridge Sfreet, ~ fee/ especially "connected" to the Vail community? ~
Gore Creek Drive, etc.) be designated (MARK ONE ONLr: `
A pedestrian-only area at all times (would restnct all surface vehicles)
OR
A pedestrian-only area some of the time (would allow loading and
delivery during a portion of time in desrgnated areas and locations) ~ Do you have any comments regarding the value of participating irr ~
Other: ; Vail activities, or how processes can be improved for volunteering ~
Please explain your suggestion (hours. location, size of vehicles, etc.): '~n Vail? ~
.
Are you aware of the "Park Free After 3" program in the Vail Village ~
and Lionshead parking structures between 3 p.m. and 7 a.m. ? ~
Yes _ No Don't know I No opinion ~ How do you prefer to receive information from the Town? ~
How has the availability of free parking changed your use (MARK ALL THAT APPLY.) ~
of the Vail commercial core areas Grearry 1_- Attend meetings ~
since March1? No Increased 2~. Mailings from the Town ~
Change Use ofArea ~ 3Newspaper coverage ~
In Vail Village 4=. Public notices, announcements, advertisements ~
In Lionshead 5 ~ Radio
6"-' Television channels 5, 8 ~
In what way? ~ ~ )
, 7 ~ Intemet ~
8 ~J E-mail: ~
What is your e-mail address? ~
Are there any additional actions by the Town or merchanfs that ~ 9~ Other: ~
would increase your use of businesses in the Village commercial ~ Please descnbe. ~
core or Lionshead?
_ Yes (please describe) ~ BES~ T Na ; c~ ~
No ? Rc.ac,~ „at
From the list above, what is the BEST
Don't know / No opinion ! way to reach you with town information?
How would you rate the overall sense of community (for example, ~(INSERT NUMBER FROM L/ST ABOVE.)
knowing your neighbors, caring and concerned 3) citizens, etc.) in the Town Poor Excellent
of Vail at the present time?
Comparing Vail to other resort communities you are familiar with,
what is Vail's greatest strength in terms of the sense of community? : How do you prefer to offer constructive feedback fo the Town? ~
i ~
i
1 _
. ~ ~
~ ~
~
.
~ Do you have computer access to fhe Intemet at home, at work, ~ What town or local information and/or services would you Iike ~
~ or at school? j to see made available on the Intemet? (MARK ALL THAT APPLY.)
! P
~ No > 1F N4-Do you intend O Yes i ~ Phone numbers
Yes to gain access in the C No j = Codes and regulations
~ next year? C Uncertain Council, PEC, DRB agendas
Forms
~ Information and announcements
~ Have you tried accessing the Have you used the Intemet to + Job openings
~ Intemet at the Vail Library? access Town of Vail information Calendar listings
Yes ~ No via the vail.nef system? _ Other (Please descnbe):
Yes No ;
~
~ Please provide the following demographic information. Feel free to leave blank any questions you are not comfortable answering. " .
~
Again, surveys will remain anonymous. Please do not write your name or address on this survey. ~ Where is your residence within the Town of Vail located? Which of these categories best describes your marital status?
~ East Vail Single, no children
~ Booth Falls and Eald Mountain Road areas Couple, no children
~ Booth CreeklAspen Lane Household with children
~ Goif Course Empty nester, children no longer at home
~ Vail Village
~ Lionshead 0 to 5 6 to 12 13 to 18
~ Potato Patch, Sandstone years years years
~ Buffehr Creek, Lionsridge, the Valley IF YOU HAVE _ . ! 1
~ Vail CommonslSafeway area CHILDREl1-
~ West Vaii (north of I-70) How many are in the
~ Matterhorn, Glen Lyon following age groups?
~ Intermountain - - .
~ Not a resident of the Town of Vail
~ Do you own or rent your residence?
~ Own Other (specify):
~ Rent
~ Do you own or operate a business within the Town of Vail?
~ Yes
~ No Which of these categones best
~ Including yourself, _ describes your age?
~ Which of the following categories best descnbes your how many persons Under 20 45 to 54
~ residency status? reside in your 20 to 24 ~ 55 to 64
~ Year-round Vail resident household? _ 25 to 34 ~ 65 or over
Seasonal Vail resident 35 to 44 ~ Do not wish
~ Owner of vacation property in Vail to reply
~ Non-resident, owner of business or commercial -
~ properly in Vail
~ Other.
~ How long have you lived within the Town of Vail
~ (or owned property if a non-resident) ? Which of these categories best describes the annual income
~ Less than 1 year of your household (before taxes)?
~ 1 to 5 years $0 -14,999 _$75,000 - 99,999
~ 6 to 15 years $15,000 - 34,999 ~$100,000 -149,999
~ More than 15 years $35,000 - 49,999 _$150,000 or more
~ $50,000 - 74,999 Do not wish to reply
~
~ Thank you for your participation in o:cr continuing evaluation program.
~ Please attach sheet for additional comments or suggestions.
A,1212315_.
~ ~ ~
Councilmember or Commissioner I
MONTHLY SALARY LONGE- INSUR- RETIREMENT ;
at Jan. 1, 1997 VITY ANCE Other Retirsnent Plans TOTAL NEXT !
Range Actuat PAY * F1CA % of Ret. COMP. AUTO OiHER SALARY ~
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION'S JOB TITLE STATUS 8 S $/mo. S/mo. % Plan Salary $ * $ REVIEH i
-
i
Alamosa Covicilmenber elected 6 at 200 0 0 0.00 PERA a 10.00 20 220 None ~
Arvada 1) Mayor Pro Tem elected 800 0 0 7.65 None 61 861 None
i
Arvada 2) Couaicilmeniber elected 5 at 750 0 0 7.65 None 57 807 None
Aspen Couicilmenber elected 4 at 800 0 0 7.65 None 61 861 None (
Aurora Mayor Pro Tem & Councit elected pro tem + 9 800 0 407 7.65 None 61 1268 None ~
~
Avon Councilmerrix r elected 6 at 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None
~
8lack Hauk Alderman elected 0 0 0 0.00 None 0 0 None ~
Boulder Councilmenber 5142.65/mtg. to 4 mtgs/mo 0 0 0.00 ICMA-RC 457-K 10.00 None i
!
Breckenridge Cancilmenber elected 6 at 500 0 0 7.65 None 38 538 None ~
Brighton Mayor Pro Tem & Caxxit elected pro tem + 7 175 0 0 0.00 None 0 175 None
Broanfield 1) Mayor Pro Tem & Council elected before 1995 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None
Broanfie(d 2) Mayor Pro Tem & Council elected in 1995 300 0 0 0.00 None 0 300 None
Brush 1) Mayor Pro Tem & Council elected 3 at 100 0 0 7.65 None 8 108 None
Brush 2) Mayor Pro Tem & Council elected 3 at 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None '
Canon City Coiricilmarber elected 200 0 10 7.65 None 15 225 None
I
Carbondale Mayor Pro Tem & Caxicil etected pro tem + 6 150 0 0 7.65 None 11 161 None
Castle Rock Councitmember elected 250 0 0 0.00 None 0 250 None
Cherry Hills Vit Councitmeiiber elected 0 0 0 0.00 None 0 0 None
Colorado Springs Councilmanber etected 9 at 521 0 0 0.00 None 0 521 None
Camierce City Councilmeniber elected 8 at 500 0 0 7.65 None 38 538 None
ol = see footnotes (R) = next salary review applies to salary range = next salary review applies to irxunbent salary ~
* Employer contribution (lnsurance includes life, health, disability, dental, and vision, as applicable.) AUTO in this colum denotes city vehicle furnished for business and personal use (some cities limit personal use to driving
vehicle to and from work). E anpints are monthly car allowance. See also general city policy on auto travel in the Appendix.
Other fringe benefits (See footnotes on last page of this publication.)
27 .
Councilmember or Commissioner
MONTHLY SALARY LONGE- INSUR- RETIREMENT
at Jan. 1, 1997 VITY ANCE Other Retiranent Plaris TOTAL
Range Actual PAY * fICA Y of Ret. CU1P. AUTO OTHER
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION'S JOB TITLE STATUS E S S/mo. E/mo, X Plan Salary A* E
Cortez Mayor Pro Tem & Council elected pro tem + 5 100 0 0 0.00 None 0 100 None
, Craig Mayor Pro Tem & Council elected pro tem + 5 200 0 0 0.00 None 0 200 None
Crested Butte Councilmenfier elected 6 at 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None
Cripp(e Creek Councilnmiber elected 442 0 0 0.00 None 0 442 None
Delta Mayor Pro Tem & Council etected pro te(n + 3 100 0 0 7.65 None 8 108 None
'
• Denver Cotxicilmeirber elected 12 at 3597 0 436 7.65 Denver Enp. Ret. Plan 10.00 635 4668 None
Di tton Caxxi lrnenber elected 6 at 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None
Durango Councilmarber elected 4 at 200 0 366 7.65 None 15 581 None
. ~ , Edgewater Councilmember elected 7 at 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None
.
' Englewood Councilmertber elected 5 at 400 0 0 0.00 None 0 400 None
~
: ' Estes Park Councilmarber ins. = avg. 6 at 100 0 275 7.65 1 a PERA 10% 8 383 None
~ Evars Couricilmember elected 6 at 175 0 0 7.65 None 13 188 K
Federal Heights 1) Mayor Pro Tem elected 500 0 0 1.45 ICMA-RC 0.00 7 507 None
' Federal Heights 2) Councilmentber elected 5 at 450 0 0 1.45 ICMA-RC 0.00 7 457 None
Florence Councilmarber elected 75 0 0 0.00 None • 0 75 None
, Fort Collins Caxicilrteniber elected 250 0 0 7.65 None 19 269 None
'
Fort Lupton Councilmember elected 6 at 108 0 0 7.65 None 8 116 None
_Fort Morgan Councilmember elected 100 0 350 0.00 PERA 10.00 10 460 None
- Fountain Caxicilmenber elected 6 at 75 0 0 7.65 None 6 81 None
, Frisco Councilmarber elected 6 at 250 0 606 7.65 None - 19 875 None
. t. ~
~ a= see footnotes (R) = next salary review applies to salary range (I) = next salary review applies to incunbent salary
Ertployer contribution (Insurance includes life, health, disability, dentat, and vision, as applicable.>
AUTO in this colum denotes city vehicle furnished for business arxl persorial use (some cities limit personal use to driving
vehicle to and fran work). S amounts are monthly car allowance. See also general city policy on auto travet in the Appendix.
Other fringe benefits (See footnotes on last page of this publication.)
28 ,
~~l. - ,
v ii ini illWli ii• rv i~~~o
counrilmember or Commissioner '
MONTHLY SALARY LONGE- INSUR- RETIREhENT i
at Jan. 1, 1997 VITY ANCE Other Retirenent Plans TOTAL NEXT
Range Actual PAY * FICA % of Ret. COMP. AUTO OTHER SALARY
JURISDICTION JURISOICTION'S J08 TITLE STATUS t $ $/rta. S/mo• % Plan Salary $ * 8 REVIEW
- -
Fruita 1) Mayor Pro Tem elected 125 0 0 7.65 None 10 135 None
Fruita 2) Cancilmenber elected 3 a 100 0 0 7.65 None 8 108 None ~
i
Fruita 3) Councilmenber elected 2 a 50 0 0 7.65 None 4 54 • None i
Glendate Mayor Pro Tem & Cancil elected pro tem + 5 400 0 508 7.65 None 31 939 None J
Glenuood Springs Mayor Pro Tem 8 Caricil elected pro tem + 5 325 0 0 7.65 None 25 350 None I
-
Golden Councilmarber elected 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None
Grarx! Junction Coincilmenber elected 6 at 200 0 0 7.65 None 15 215 None
Greeley Councilmenber etected 6 at 500 0 0 7.65 None 38 538 None
Greenuood Village Councilmenber elected 8 at 750 0 0 7.65 None 57 807 None
Gunnisori Councilmember elected 400 0 0 7.65 None 37 431 None
lafayette Mayor Pro Tem & Cawicil elected pro tem + 5 175 0 0 1.45 City Plan 4.00 10 185 None
La Junta Mayor Pro Tem & Cancit elected pro tem + 6 0 0 0 0.00 None 0 0 None ~
I
Lakewood Councilmenber elected 10 at 600 0 439 0.00 Employee contrib. only 0.00 0 1039 None ~
Lartiar Mayor Pro Tem & Caxici l elected pro tem + 5 20 0 0 7.65 None 2 22 None '
littleton 1) Mayor Pro Tem elected pro tem 450 0 0 7.65 None 34 484 None ~
i
. ,
~
Littleton 2) Cancilmenber elected 5 a 400 0 0 7.65 None 31 431 None ~
~
Longnont Councilmenber elected 6 at 400 0 0 7.65 None 31 431 None ~
Louisvitle Councilmwber elected 100 0 0 7.65 None 8 108 None
lovelaid 1) Mayor Pro Tem elected 500 0 0 7.65 None 38 538 None
Lovetand 2) Caruil elected 7 at 400 0 0 7.65 None 31 431 Norie
F
I
ol = see footnotes (R) _ next salary review applies to salary range (t) = next salary revieu applies to inairbent salary ~
* Enployer contribution (lnsurance includes life, health, disability, dental, and vision, as applicaUle.) ~
AUTO in this colum denotes city vehicle furnished for business and personal use (some cities limit personal use to driving -
vehicle to and #ran work). $ amants are monthly car allowance. See also general city policy on auto travel in the Appendix.
Other fringe benefits (See footnotes on last page of this publication.)
29
Councilmember or Commissioner MONTHLY SALARV LONGE- INSUR- RETIREMENT
at Jan. 1, 1997 VITV ANCE Other Retirernent Plans TOTAL
Range Actual PAY * fICA Y of Ret. COMP. AUTO OTHER
JURISDICT[ON JURISDICTION S JOB T1TLE STATUS $ E $/mo. 4/mo, % Plan Salary S* S
Manitou Springs Councilmember elected b at 0 0 0 0.00 None 0 0 None
Monte Vista Councitnmber elected 4 at 193 0 411 7.65 None 15 619 None
Montrose Mayor Pro 1em & Council elected pro tem + 3 101 0 0 7.65 None 8 109 None
Mt. Crested Butte Mayor Pro Tem & Council elected pro tem + 5 100 0 0 0.00 None 0 100 None 1
Northglerm 1) Mayor Pro Tem elected 404 0 0 0.00 None 0 404 None
'
' Northg(em 2) Councilmenber elected 7 at 351 0 0 0.00 None 0 351 None
- Parker Couicitmertber elected 6 at 250 0 0 7.65 None 19 269 None
Pueblo Councilmatber elected 6 at 400 0 0 0.00 None 0 400 None
1 ,
, Rifle Councitmenber elected 50 0 0 7.65 None 4 54 None
' Rocky Ford Councilmertiber elected $40/yr. 3 0 0 7.65 None 0 3 None
. Sheridan Councilmertber elected 250 0 7 7.65 ICMA-RC 457-K 0.00 19 276 None
Silverthorne Caxicilmenber elected 6 at 300 0 0- 0.00 ICMA-RC 7.50 23 323 None
Snowrcass Village Councilmariber elected 500 0 0 7.65 None 38 538 None
Steamboat Springs Couicitmember elected 6 at 400 0 233 7.65 None 31 664 None
Sterling 1> Mayor Pro Tem elected 250 0 0 7.65 None 19 269 None
Sterling 2) Councilmertber elected 5 at 200 0 0 7.65 None , 15 215 None
' Telluride Councilmertiber elected 685 0 685 7.65 None 52 1422 None
Thorntai Couxicilmenber elected 8 at 400 0 411 7.65 None 31 gyZ NQne
• Trinidad Mayor Pro Tem & Cotxicil elected pro tem + 5 75 0 0 7.65 None 6 81 None
Vail Councilmertber elected 200 0 0 W None 0 200 None
" 51 = see footnotes (R) = next salary review applies to salary range (1) = next salary review applies to incunbent salary
* Employer contribution (Insurance inc(udes life, health, disability, dental, and vision, as applicable.)
AUTO in this colum denotes city vehicle furnished for business and personal use (some cities limit personal use to driving
vehicle to arxi from work). E amouits are monthly car allowance. See also general city policy on auto travel in the Appendix.
Other fringe benefits (See footrates on last page of this publication.)
30 ~
VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
FROM: Greg Morrison. Chief of Police
DATE: February 12, 1998 ~
-REF: Federal Drug Grant
The Federal Government has designated Eagle, Garfield and Mesa Counties as "High . •
Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas" (HIDTAs) due to the large `quantities of illegal drugs .
being transported into these counties and through the I-70 conidor. With HITDA
designation, our counties became eligible to apply for new federal drug enforcement
grants. Late last year, the Vail Police Department in cooperation with the Eagle County Sheriffs
Office, the Glenwood Springs Police Department, the Garfield County Sheriff s Office,
the Grand Junction Police Department, the, Mesa County Sheriff's Office, the Eagle
County District Attorney's Office and the Garfield County District Attorney's Office
submitted a unified grant request for HITA funds. Our grant request was approved.
Vail PD and the Eagle County Sheriff s Office have jointly received $207,000 for drug
enforcement in Eagle County for 1998. This grant will only fund additional drug
enforcement, it cannot fund existing positions, except for overtime. The grant will fully
fund two full time police positions (including all benefits), lease two cars, buy radios and
other equipment, fund drug purchases, travel, training, and will fund overtime for these
two positions and other officers who assist them. This grant is a reimbursement grant,
we must expend the funds first and get reimbursement on a quarterly basis. There is no
requirement for local matching funds for this grant, it is 100% funded by the Federal
Government. The grant is funded 1 year at a time and requires re-submittal for each
subsequent year. The Drug Enforcement Administration believes these grants will
continue to be funded for at least 3 to 4 years.
The Sheriff and I each would hire one additional officer for the duration of this grant
funding. those two officers will be teamed up with Vail's existing drug detective forming
a task force of three officers. Vail's additional position would be eliminated upon the
expiration of the grant. •
I believe that I will need a supplemental appropriation of approximately $104,000 for our
half of the expenses associated with this grant, all of which will be reimbursed by the
Federal Government.
Lout"A•t,
TOWN OF VAIL
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX ~
HISTORY 1980 TO 1996
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL
JANUARY $63,999 $98,089 $106,981 $119,972 $78,053 $80,733 $101,374 $131,916 $96,119 $309,232
FEBRUARY $40,595 $69,018 $105,024 $132,220 $86,289 $170,052 $64,906 $44,040 $109,873 $140,192
MARCH $69,886 $126,935 $109,533 $137,820 $62,693 $63,831 $92,557 $38,791 $68,104 $145,957
APRIL $76,855 $94,653 . $65,900 $103,526 $173,321 $90,396 $182,743 $95,554 $179,671 $151,069
MAY $42,738 $84,324 $54,663 $90,599 $96,006 $228,673 $98,651 $120,984 $99,736 $220,299
JUNE $62,239 $125,433 $54,488 $140,638 $76,467 $49,513 $79,915 $73,509 $101,364 $122,466
JULY $49,367 $186,110 $104,262 $68,539 $157,598 $88,528 $70,441 $47,949 $126,537 $125,676
AUGUST $79,859 $115,499 $71,282 $97,806 $58,937 $32,860 $100,182 $61,137 $109,315 $86,347
SEPT $59,800 $113,992 $49,332 $96,746 $64,671 $48,516 $108,167 $78,819 $116,557 $143,306
OCTOBER $108,510 $154,000 $42,498 $122,546 $88,732 $109,633 $93,860 $124,291 $177,360 $241,393
NOV $102,623 $107,768 $81,698 $91,385 $105,109 $74,909 $89,047 $114,839 $241,888 $165,964
DEC $142,662 $133,867 $110,911 $56,533 $81,890 $333,139 $106,695 $95,495 $192,947 $192,737
TOTAL $899,133 $1,409,688 $956,572 $1;258,330 $1,129,766 $1,370,783 $1,188,538 $1,027,324 $1,619,471 $2,044,638
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL RESALE TMSHRE OTHER
JANUARY $162,954 $165,141 $88,238 $179,188 $220,453 $87,147 $319,817 $316,325 $3,447 $45
FEBRUARY $133,085 $71,413 $110,960 $141,960 $240,702 $109,630 $76,343 $75,543 $772 $28
MARCH $77,995 $183,698 $116,626 $178,032 $87,542 $99,894 $140,845 $136,188 $4,625 $32
APRIL $152,027 $108,040 $213,245 $107,475 $223,569 $196,756 $109,492 $108,656 $1,096 ($260)
MAY $167,972 $96,994 $142,817 $189,742 $82,092 $226,212 $200,676 $199,641 $991 $44
JUNE $136,364 $141,863 $138,852 $112,847 $174,923 $188,134 $133,584 $126,512 $7,066 $6
JULY $75,169 $132,042 $95,373 $168,959 $78,419 $64,736 $126,658 $118,747 $7,831 $80
AUGUST $77,486 $99,820 $91,695 $145,035 $126,988 $114,649 $123,534 $121,552 $1,875 $107
SEPT $75,746 $85,645 $132,331 $195,685 $262,758 $150,642 $209,743 $199,335 $10,158 $250
OCTOBER $118,986 $258,974 $179,094 $180,475 $274,475 $181,196 $304,309 $288,838 $15,466 $5
NOV $102,210 $268,394 $240,933 $176,174 $420,409 $122,898 $240,102 $228,124 $11,773 $205
DEC $107,880 $95,742 $441,832 $202,004 $66,423 $130,201 $143,308 $139,130 $4,157 $21
TOTAL $1,387,874 $1,707,766 $1,991,996 $1,977,576 $2,258,753 $1,672,095 $2,128,411 $2,058,591 $69,257 $563
TOWN OF VAIL
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER.TAX
HISTORY 1997 TO 1998 1997 1998
ACTUAL ACTUAL RESALE TMSHRE OTHER
JANUARY $275,490 $120,263 $118,874 $755 $634
FEBRUARY $183,669
MARCH $186,395
APRIL $296,444
MAY $149,172
JUNE $200,655
JULY $121,591
AUGUST $185,126
SEPT $339,897
OCTOBER $471,530
NOV $329,684
DEC $228,958
TOTAL $2,968,611 $118,874 $755 $634
FEB, 18. 1998 1:34PM UR PUBI,IC REI.ATIONS N0, 5927 P. 1/1
i.TO : TOV
-:t >'-~•.,t'~~ 4( ,rr
~AIIr VALI.FY SUMMER
vAll • DLnvr.-x CAEFK - nvnM • MIN1"urtN
yy..
r
FQR EMMEDYATE RELEASE:
~.,,,:i. •
~,..",1a•"=`' 1Vledia contacts:
Pat Peeples-- 970.845.8525
,
PmaiXy Jacob-- 970.476.1000 (3006)
ADAM ARON TO 9PEAK AT VAIL VALLEY MARKETING BOARD
BREAKFAST
Merchants, Lodges, Restaurants and Community Members Invited to Lodge at
'•Vail for Sumimer Update
.
Vai1, Colo. February 18, 1998 -The V'ail Val]ey Marketing Board (WMB) will
host a
`breakfast updating all constituents on the 1998 summer marketing effort on T'hursday,
i• ,+1,
. ' Februazy 26=h at 8:00 a.m. at the Lodge at Vail's new Grand Ballraom.
'7~'• • Adam Aron, chairman of the board and chief executive officer for Vail ltesorts will be
the keynote speaker. Mr. Aron will address the current valley-wide effort now underway;
y'•.:
the impact of marketing in the Vail Valley from a competitive point of view and his
. ~ ; • ; r:.,; ,
outlook for the future of business grovvth in the non-ski mont}as of May through October.
'T'hroughont his.cazeer in the airline, hotel, cruise-line and ;now ski businesses, A,ron has
. a~~_
•~'~t'~? aehieved tremendous success and is best kuown for his national and international
znazketing campaigns.
1.A
-r'
I• i' ,
"'Tb.e meetin on Febru~Y 26~' is certain
-.••~•.,-•g to enlighten and entertain us as we continue to
~;t; aggressively market the summer months," said Ross Boyle, directoz- of the WM$. "We
encourage all interested to please attend."
~s~'°•'~ The fee for the breakfast is $10 Per Person. Guests are asked to R,SVp b honin
Y P g the
~ ;-;Vaitl Valley Toudsm and Convention Bu.reau at 476-1000 ext. 3015.
? •
For more infozmation, phone Peeples Ink at 970.845.8525 or Emily Jacob at the WTCB
at 476-1000 ext. 3006. .
'-30-
,~s`i:' , VA1L VALLEY MARAETING I30AAA)
F'UST OFFILP. BOX 7
VAiL, GULOR/?llU $1658
PHnNL 970.845-572$
~{~`il;• RAX 970-Ad,5-572R
N, ~ hccpl/v;iil.nct/mi mmcr
~
~
u
~y
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road ~ • ~
Yail, Colorado 81657 MEDIA ADVISORY ~
970-479-21 DO
FAX 9~0-479-2157 February 18, 1998
ontact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115
TM
Community Information Office
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL HIGHLIGHTS FOR FEBRUARY 17 - •
Please note: Councilmembers have asked fo change the start time of ihe evening
meeting to 7 p.m. (30 minutes earlier) and to keep the length of the evening meeting
fo a maximum of three hours effective March 17, 1998. Also, fhe format of the aftemoon
work session has changed. These sessions, beginning at 2 p.m. each week, are now
used for informafion-gafhering and discussion, while the twice-a-month evening business
meeting will focus on citizen input and legislative decisions.
Work Session Briefs
Councilmembers present: Armour, Arnett, Foley, Jewett, Kurz, Navas
--Discussion of Public Process Options to Identify a Permanent Funding Source for Housing, as
Well As a Siting Package for Vail's Housing, Parks, Public Facilities and Open Space Needs.
The Council reviewed four options that would advance the Council's commitment to identify a
permanent funding source for locals housing, as well as identification of sites.
Councilmembers debated the merits of all four approaches, with varying timeliness ranging from
one month to 12 months, and will resume the discussion at next Tuesday's work session. For a
copy of the four options, contact Suzanne Silverthorn in the Community Information Office at
479-2115.
--Bus Tour of Publicly Held Lands
The Council, along with seven members of the public, toured 65 vacant properties, most of them
owned by the town, to familiarize themselves with various undeveloped parcels in preparation for -
upcoming decisions to be made as part of a public process on creating a siting package for
housing, parks, public facilities and open space. The tour included a review of the town's 14
designated open space parcels totaling 382 acres. Those parcels can't be changed or sold
without a vote of the electorate. Currently there are 135 undeveloped parcels remaining within
Vail's boundaries: six single family; 20 residential/cluster; 26 dupfex; 80 primary/secondary; and
three other. For a list of the 65 properties toured by the Council, contact Suzanne Silverthorn in
the Community Information Office at 479-2115.
--Other
During an update on the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan process, the Council agreed to
postpone its continued discussion of height and mass issues previously scheduled for Feb. 24.
Instead, the Council will host a joint discussion with the Planning and Environmental Commission
at its March 3 meeting. This means the PEC discussion originally scheduled for Feb. 23 has
been canceled. For more information, contact Mike Mollica in the Community Development
Department at 479-2144.
(more)
C~ RECYCLEDPAPER
J
TOV Council Highlights 2-17-98/Add1
Evening Session Briefs
Councilmembers present: Armour, Arnett, Foley, Jewett, Kurz, Navas
--Citizen Participation
There was no citizen participation.
--Major Amendment to the Vail Athletic Club Special Development District
The Council voted 6-0 to approve first reading of an ordinance approving a major amendment to
the Vail Athletic Club Special Development District. The measure allows for modifications to the
parking garage, restaurant, common areas and accommodation and dwelling units. 'The ,
legislation, which will be considered for second reading on March 3, is the final step in a long-
awaited approval process for renovation of the facility. Plans call for the elimination of two
accommodation units, the conversion of one two bedroom dwelling unit to a"presidential suite"
accommodation unit, and the expansion of one dwelling unit. Overall, the VAC would have a
total of 54 hotel rooms, 3 dwelling units and 4 employee housing units. The town originally
approved the VAC's application for a Special Development District in 1993. However, a lawsuit
filed by an adjacent property owner (an unsuccessful attempt to preserve a private view corridor),
along with design modifications, caused the project to be delayed. For more information, contact
Mike Mollica in the Community Development Department at 479-2144.
--Ordinance Establishing Start Time for the Town Council Evening Meeting
The Council voted 6-0 on second reading to approve an ordinance that enables the Council to
establish a start time for its evening meeting at the first organizational meeting following the
municipal election. Passage of the ordinance now clears the way for consideration of a
resolution at Council's March 3 meeting to establish a 7 p.m. start time (30 minutes earlier than
the existing start time) effective March 17, 1998. During discussion, Councilmember Sybill
Navas wondered if Councilmembers would consider a 6:30 p.m. start. The new start time will be
determined during discussion of the resolution on March 3.
--Resolution Adopting the Intergovernmental Agreement Between and Among the Towns of
Avon, Basalt, Eagle, Gypsum, Minturn, Red Cliff and Vail
The Council voted 6-0 to approve an intergovernmental agreement with the municipalities in
Eagle County to address managed growth concerns throughout the county. Specifically, the
agreement encourages the "concentration of planned and needed growth and density in
municipalities where such growth is more efficiently and cost-effectively served by centralized
infrastructure and services and where its location will help preserve open spaces and agricultural
land; and coordination of land use decisions between the county and municipalities within those
areas identified by the municipalities and the county within which land use change will have a
significant impact on either the county. or a municipality." Also, the agreement requests a joint
meeting with Eagle Counry otficials to increase coordination of the managed growth issues. For
more information, contact Town Manager Bob McLaurin at 478-2105.
--Seibert Circle Art Project
The Council reviewed the status of the Seibert Circle Art project with Nancy Sweeney,
coordinator of the town's Art In Public Places (AIPP) project. Sweeney presented a design
recently approved by the AIPP board which is also headed for final review by the Design Review
Board (DRB) on Wednesday (2-18). The design, which has evolved over the past two years,
features a small amphitheatre-like gathering space in the center of the circle with three vertical
granite sculptures designed by renowned artist Jesus Morales. Also, the project includes a
bronze statue of Pete Seibert designed by Susan Raymond. Sweeney said the design has been
enthusiastically received by adjacent property owners who have asked that construction be
contained to April through June of either this year or next. Pete Seibert, for whom the circle is
(more)
#
~
TOV Council Highlights/2-17-98/Add2
named, expressed uncertainty regarding his support for the design, while Ron Riley, an adjacent
business owner, encourged the Council to move forward. Kaye Ferry, representing the Vail
Village Merchant Association, asked that construction be delayed for a year due to other
construction projects in the Village that are already on line. Councilmembers reacted positively
to the project's design (Navas suggested tweaking placement of one of the sculptures to allow
for better site fines), although opinions differed regarding how to offset a budget shortfall of
$183,000. The shortfall has been caused by expansion of the proposed streetscape
improvements to include private property (building front to building front), as well as an additional $68,500 for the Seibert bronze and $5,000 to relocate the fire hydrant, for a total-of $73,500. The '
total streetscape improvement, which will include heated pavers, is estimated at $800,000.
Although he said called it a"wonderful project," Councilman Michael Jewett said he questioned
using tax dollars for public art, while Councilmembers Sybill Navas, Michael Arnett and Bob
Armour encouraged additional financial support from surrounding property owners to complete
the project. Councilman Ludwig Kurz suggested moving foward with the project, noting that
costs aren't likely to go down. In concluding the discussion, Town Manager Bob McLaurin said
he would return to the Council next week with an indication of private sector funding participation,
as well as confirmation of the AIPP's pledge to raise $70,000 from the community. Aiso, the
Council will review the project in the context of other capital improvements budgeted for 1998.
For more information, contact Nancy Sweeny at 479-2344 or Bob McLaurin at 479-2105.
--Update and Funding Request from Vail Tomorrow Communiry Center Coordinating Team
Stan Cope, a volunteer member of the Vail Tomorrow Community Center Coordinating Team,
presented an update on the team's progress in advancing the concept of a Vail Community
Center. Cope said the team has developed a community-based approach that would identify and
prioritize possibte components of a community center that would dovetail with a public process
currently under consideration by the Council. The larger process under consideration by the
Council would create a siting package for Vail's housing, parks, public facilities and open space
needs, as well as a permanent funding source for housing. Once a budget is established,
currently estimated at $20,000, Cope said the team would like to return to the town to request
that it fund half the cost of the public process, assuming the Vail Recreation District (VRD) funds
the remaining portion. Diane Johnson, the VRD's youth services coordinator, aiso appeared
before the Council last night and expressed VRD's support for the effort, although the funding
commitment still needs to be approved by the VRD board. Although generally supportive,
Councilmembers Bob Armour and Michael Arnett expressed concern that a wish list effort might
result in expectations that would be difficult for the town to fulfill, given space and budget
constraints. In response, Cope assured the Council that such a process would not automatically
bind or obligate the town to a future action. For more information, contact Cope at 476-9530.
--Council Reports
Sybill Navas noted her attendance and involvement in the Vail Tomorrow Community Center
Coordinating Team discussions, as well as the Seibert Circle neighborhood meeting.
Kevin Foley issued a reminder regarding the upcoming Vail Recreation District board election.
° Nominating petitions for the board are due Feb. 27. Foley also noted his attendance at an Alpine
Garden Foundation fund-raiser and at a Lionshead Master plan community meeting.
(more)
k
A
TOV Council Highlights/2-17-98/Add3
--Other
Councilmember Sybill Navas suggested consideration of a pedestrian crosswalk at the Municipal
Building, while Councitman Bob Armour announced the upcoming Chamber of Commerce mixer
at the Vail Athletic Club.
UPCOMING DISCUSSION TOPICS
February 24 Work Session .
PEC/DRB Review
Jim Spell 20 Year Employee Anniversary
Final Approval of Slifer Plaza Design/Enhancements
Mountain Haus Request to Proceed through the Planning Process
Council Compensation Discussion
Seibert Circle
Selection of Public Process for Designation of Housing Funding Source and Siting for Housing,
Open Space, Public Facilities and Parks
Discussion of Funding Request from Vail Tomorrow Community Center Coordinating Team
March 3 Work Session
Corey Schmidt 20 Year Employee Anniversary
Jacque Lovato 20 Year Employee Anniversary
Linda Moore 15 Year Employee Anniversary
AIPP Board Interviews
Lionshead Master Plan Stage 3, Height & Mass
Request to Amend Special Development District #4
Discussion of Vail Plaza Hotel
March 3 Evening Meeting
Presentation of Vail Youth Award to Collins Canada and Traci Phelan
Second Reading, Ordinance #3, Amending SDD #30 and Ordinance #2
# # #
.rr s ~ r;~,-i . :3i:;`I•~1~".l,~jt:~i:~ ir~9~{f:1j a>~i':~f::~ :~I~~' P t,t~t;'3
February 12, 1998 The Eagle Valley Enterprise Page 5
Adding more count commission
y ers considered
Vafl that converting the county to "home raised concerns about a lack of response provide legal representation for thegroup.
mayor discusses the rule" would allow for the addition of two by some elected oBlcials and their staffs
to ic at ACT meeting commissioners. to growth-related issues. Most remarks 'Land grab' feared
p He added that the Process would be were directed at the county, with "county Joe Macy, mountain planner for Vafl
By Mike Spanlole lengthy and involved, but that some area bashing" and "doing a number on the Associates, gave a brief presentation on
Enterprise publisher o8lcials who met in Eagle last Monday county" mentioned by two participants. some aspects of Category III, and county
VAIL-Trying to gain a greater voice are studying the possibilityof home rule. Members targeted no specific projects planner Keith Montag gave an overview
in governing county growth, some area That meeting included the mayors and as a group, but talked instead of the of planned revisions to the 1982 Eagle
town oflicials aze studying the idea of managers of six Eagle County need to monitor those projects scheduled County Land Use Regulations.
adding two more seats to the Eagle municipalities who discussed growth for review by the county, tncluding the Montag spoke ofa proposal contained
County Board of Commissioners. impacts of county-approved Vafl Valley Centre; Adam's Rib; and in the new land use regulations that
Currently, three commissioners developments near their own Category III, the expansion planned for allows "clustering" of up to three houses
represent an estimated year-round Juridisctions. Vafl Mountain ski terrain. withone 1,500-square-footauxlliaryunit
county population of 32,000 ' and, Ford polnted out that Vail had seven Concerns also focused on each on 35-acre tracts.
according to state statutes, a county represenfatives ori its council for a communication with the county, and Montagsaid the idea was to encourage
must have a populaUon of 70,000 before population of 4,000. group members were encouraged towrite landowners to keep bulldings in one
adding two mflre commissioners. To Jacque Whitsitt, a Basalt town trustee to the appropriate project o8icials and area of the tract, but most ACT members
preventtievotes, the law requires adding and DisWct 3 candidate for the Eagle editorial letters to local newspapers to perceived the plan negatively, fearing it
more than just one commissioner. County Board of Commissioners, was eacpress their views. would lead to a"land gab" by some
Vafl Mayor ~Rob Ford broached the also at the meeting. In an intervlew the ACT members also voted to form as a developers who would place up to a
issue Monday night at a meeting of ACT, followtng day, she said Pltkin County not-for-profltgroup under provisions that dozen homes and an equal number of
The Alliance of Citizens for Tomorrow, a had adopted home rule in 1978. Some allow for them to endorse political secondary buildings on four adJoining
citizen's groupformed to address growth Pitkin county staff members told her candidates and to lobby oSicials. The tracts, for example.
and development in Eagle County. The that part of the reason home rule was structure, however, preciudes tax Montag said others had the same
group evolved from Concerned Citlzens pursued was to increase representation deductible donations. concerns, whichwouldbe reviewed. "This
of Eagle County, which fought against through the numbers of commissioners The group elected a 15-member board is one of the more sensitive lssues. We
the Adam's Rib ski area. The meeting and that citizens wanted increased publlc ofdirectors to serve initial one-year terms. know these regulations need work. Don't
was ACT's second and about 40 area process. The charter included mandates Board members from Eagle include Jerry feel as though these are how they'll end
residents attended. to create advisory groups in various Fedrizzi, Ken Neubecker, John Stavney, up,^ ,
Ford's comments came on the heels areas such as finance. Susie Kincaid and Rosie Shearwood. He noted, however, compromise is
of remarks by some ACT members who The public process took up to two Annie Gibbons of Gypsum, Bob Morrts needed. "We're hearing very loud and
asked about the possibility of recalling years, she said, but that was mostly due and Bill Andree of Edwards, Merrill clear from both ends of the spectrum,
current commissioners whose views on to the time it took to draft the chazter. Hastings and Clark Ewing of McCoy, and we need to hear more from people in
growth-related issues did not suit them. Jenny Maxtield of Wolcott and Ginny the middle, so 1Ys going to be a
The idea of a recall did not meet wlth ACT board elected Culp of Vafl were among other members compromise," he said. "If we can't get
much enthusiasm from other group ACT's two-hour meeting, held in the elected to the board. All were elected that, then these regulations are never
members, but Ford told the gathering community room of the Vail library, unanimously. Morris, an attorney, will going to get finished."
Candidates wanted
for Eagle Town Board Mppppp Mppppp pmo0o0 m0omm0
Residents are invited to attend an Q 0
informal gathering Monday, Feb. 16 at ~ ~ WT
7:30 p.m. in Eagle to discuss the up- 3
(l....~.al ,.1.. .ai . .
v.C
KECEIVE!~
' OF'COCp'
I v~ O
\ T J \E `1 N'~ ~j
State Representative 1876 Chairman:
LEWIS H. ENTZ Agricuiture, Livestock & Natural
1016 North 11th Lane
Hooper COLORADO Resources Committee
, Colorado 81136
Home: (719) 754-3750 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Member: Fax: (719) 754-9079 Local Government Committee Capitol: (303) 866-2963 STATE CAPITOL Western Legislative Conference
Environment, Natural Resources
DENVER and Water Committee
e0203 Energy Council -
Executive Committee February 16, 1998 The Honorable Robert E. Ford
Mayor, Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mayor Ford:
Thank you for your correspondence in support of House Bill 1200, the Local Marketing
Districts bill.
I am in agreement with my legislative colleagues Representative Taylor and Senator
Wattenberg and will enthusiastically support this bill. We certainly need to provide more
flexibility to cross boundaries to generate more marketing dollars critical to the survival
of many business entities across the state.
Thank you again for your corresporidence as we work to pass House Bill 1200.
Sincerely,
r
Lewis H. Entz
State Representative
House District 60
LHE/mcb
~
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: February 23, 1998 SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow the Vail Recreation District to
construct four new offices and one meeting room to accommodate the spqrts staff
at the Vail Tennis Center, located at 700 South Frontage Road EasUa.k.a. Gerald . R. Ford Park.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Mike Ortiz
Planner: George Ruther
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE RE UEST
The Vail Recreation District (VRD), represented by Mike Ortiz, is requesting a conditional
use permit, pursuant to Chapter 16 of the Zoning Regulations. This request would allow
the Vail Recreation District to construct four new offices (560 sq. ft.) and one meeting
room in the Vail Tennis Center (all interior construction). The new offices and meeting
room are intended to accommodate the VRD's sports staff. There are currently four
employees working out of the tennis center facility. The total number of employees
working out of the Vail Tennis Center, subject to the issuance of this conditional use
permit, would be nine. The five additional members of the staff are currently using the
offices located in the lower level of the Vail Public Library. The library space is leased by
the VRD from the Town of Vail. The Town Councif has expressed an interest in regaining
the use of the library space occupied by the VRD.
11. BACKGROUND
• In January of 1985, the process of creating a master plan for the development of Ford
Park began. In August of that same year, the Gerald R. Ford Park and Donovan Park
Master Plan was completed. According to the final report prepared by the project
consultant, the Master Plan is intended to direct the future development of the park and
establish guidelines for the implementation of the future improvements to the park.
• On March 17, 1997, the Town Council adopted the "Ford Park Management Plan: an
amendment to the Ford Park Master Plan." The purpose of the Ford Park Management
Plan document is to guide the future development of Ford Park.
• On February 10, 1998, the VRD appeared before the Town Council with a request to
proceed through the conditional use permit review process. As the property owner of
Ford Park, the Town Council must grant its permission to allow an applicant to proceed
through the review process. The Town Council approved the VRD's request. The
approval carried with it direction from the Town Council that any negative impact on the
free skier parking (winter) at Ford Park be mitigated. The approval to proceed through
the review process was not a grant of approval of the conditional use permit.
1
a
mWvoFV~u
~
IIi. REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT PLANNING RELATED DOCUMENTS
The following documents were reviewed by the staff in the preparation of this
memorandum:
1. Town of Vail Municipal Code2oning Map.
2. Ford Park Management Plan.
Town of Vail Municiaal Code2oning Map
According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, Ford Park is located in the General Use (GU) Zone District. As stated in the Zoning Regulations, Section 12-9C=1, the General Use Zone District is intended to:
"provide sites for public and quasi-public uses which, because of their special
characteristics, cannot be appropriately regulated by the development standards
described for other zoning districts, and for which development standards
especially prescribed for each particular development proposal or project are
necessary to achieve the purposes prescribed in Section 12-1-2 (general
provisions) and to provide for the.public welfare. The General Use Zone District is
intended to insure the public buildings and grounds in certain types of quasi-public
uses permitted in the District are appropriately located and designed to meet the
needs of residents and visitors to Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and,
in the case of buildings and other structures, to insure adequate light, air, open
spaces, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of uses."
The General Use Zone District allows for permitted uses, conditional uses, and accessory
uses. In the General Use District, development standards in each of the following
categories shall be prescribed by the PEC:
a. Lot area and site dimensions;
b. Setbacks;
c. Building heights;
d. Density control;
e. Site coverage;
f. Landscaping and site development; and
g. Parking and loading. .
The development standards for the General Use Zone District shall be proposed by the applicant
as part of a conditional use permit application. Site specific development standards shall then be
determined by the PEC during the review of the conditional use permit request, in accordance
with Chapter 16 (Conditional Use Permits). Additional regulations pertaining to site development
standards, in the development of the land in the General Use District, are found in Chapter 14
(Supplemental Regulations) of the Zoning Regulations.
Staff believes that the only development standard effected by this conditional use permit
application is parking.
2
~
Parkina
As previously stated, the parking requirement shall be determined by the PEC. It shaN be
the applicant's responsibility to propose a parking plan which, in the opinion of the PEC,
adequately addresses the parking needs for the proposed development.
Historically, parking has proven to be a reoccurring problem at Ford Park. The addition of
sports staff offices at the Vail Tennis Center would no doubt increase the parking demand
on Ford Park, with the greatest concern being the impact on the free winter skier parking.
The staff would-recommend that the parking requirements prescribed in Chapter 10 of the '
Zoning Regulations be applied to the VRD sports staff office use. According to the
parking requirements, professional offices shall provide 1.0 parking space per 250 square
of net floor area. Based of these figures, the VRD would be required to provide 3 parking
spaces (560 sq. ft. @ 1 space/250 sq. ft.) for the office use.
The PEC could require that the actual construction of the three new spaces be postponed
until such a time as the Town, and the other users of Ford Park, are ready to implement
the parking lot changes recommended in the Management Plan.
Staff would also suggest that the PEC consider whether it is more appropriate to base
parking needs on the actual number of employees required to successfully staff the
sports office. This method would insure that adequate parking was provided for all
employees. At this time, it is anticipated that five additional employees will be required to
staff the VRD sports office.
Ford Park Management Plan
The Ford Park Management Plan is an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan. The
purpose of the Plan is to guide the outcome of future development, formulate design alternatives,
and recommend development guidelines for Ford Park.
The location of the VRD sports staff offices is in general compliance with the Plan. During the
public pracess for the formulation of the Management Plan, concerns were expressed that no
new buildings should be constructed in Ford Park. Staff believes that the construction of the new
offices within an existing building will have minimal, if any, negative impacts on Ford Park as a
whole.
The fo!lowing goals and objectives are relevant to this proposal:
Goal #4 Resolve parking shortage and South Frontage Road access problems.
4.1 Objective: Develop a Parking Management Plan to include directed
parking, enhanced shuttle bus service and other incentives
to reduce the parking demand.
Action Step 4.1.4: Improve pedestrian routes to the park by improving
signs, lighting and pathway design.
3
c
4.2 Objective: improve vehicular access from the South Frontage Road
and improve parking Iot design to maximize the number of
spaces, aesthetics, and safety, while mitigating
environmental impacts.
Action Step 4.2.2: Design and construct improvements to all existing
parking areas that maximize the number of parking,
spaces with landscape buffering and treating
surface stormwater run-off.
Goal #5 Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park and the .
. pedestrian connections between Ford Park and Vail Village.
Policy Statement 14: Any uses added to Ford Park in the future
shall be structured to encourage users or participants to walk or
ride the bus rather than drive.
Policy Statement 15: Pedestrian access to the Park from Vail
Village should be easy and visible. The park shall be as
pedestrian-friendly as possible.
5.2 Obj.ective: Improve pedestrian routes to Ford Park.
5.3 Objective: Improve internal pedestrian circulation within Ford Park. In response to the goals, objectives and action steps identified above, the Town has
initiated several improvements to Ford Park. Most notably is the construction of a new
pedestrian path from the Vail Transportation Center to Vail Tennis Center this past
summer. The new path was constructed to improve pedestrian routes to Ford Park and
to encourage users and participants to walk to Ford Park rather than arrive by car.
IV. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Upon review of Chapter 16 of tne Zoning Regulations, the Community Development Department
recommends approval of the conditional use permit request to allow for four new offices and one
meeting room to be constructed at the Vail Tennis Center, located in Ford Park, based upon the
following factors:
A. CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS:
1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of
the Town.
Staff believes the applicanYs proposal is in concert with the Town
development objectives and will have minimal, if any, negative impacts on
existing or potential uses in Ford Park. The new offices are intended to
replace the VRD's use of the offices currently located on the lower level of
, the Vail Public Library.
4
.
r
According to the Ford Park Management Plan, in part,
"staff offices for on-site park activities is an allowed use."
and,
"new or changed facilities or uses will not be permitted to curtail
existing public uses or facilities in the Park unless there is a _
compelling public interest or adequate alternative facilities are
available to its users." .
Staff believes that the additional office use of the Vail Tennis Center wifl
not curtail any public uses or facilities in Ford Park. Staff believes that the
greatest impact to Ford Park will be on parking. Staff would recommend
that the parking impact be mitigated by the VRD through off-site parking of
at least five employee vehicles. The off-site employee parking could be
accommodated in the Vail Transportation Center. Employees could park
in the structure and use the new pedestrian path to get to the sports staff
offices. A revised tease agreement between the VRD and the Town would
need to be drafted and executed. This revised agreement would be
reviewed and approved by the Town Council.
Staff would further suggest that the VRD contribute to the construction and
implementation of the recommended improvements to Ford Park as
outlined in the Ford Park Management Plan. The recommended
improvements are outlined in Section 5 of the plan. The extent of
involvement by the VRD should be proportionate to the VRD's impacts on
the park. Possible involvement might include helping to resolve the
parking shortage and South Frontage Road access problems and
improving the internal pedestrian circulation within the park and enhancing
pedestrian connections to the park.
2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation
facilities, and other public facilities needs.
Staff believes that the VRD's proposal will have minimal, negative impacts
on the above-described criteria. As discussed in the previous criteria, staff
believes the greatest impact of the applicanYs proposal will be on parking.
However, staff believes that the parking impact can be successfully
mitigated.
To help further the goals of the Town and to improve community meeting
room opportunities, staff has suggested to the applicant that they allow a
community meeting room use within their office space. Staff believes
such an arrangement could be coordinated and would result in a positive
, impact in terms of ineeting our Town's public facility needs.
5
• ~
3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and
parking areas.
Staff believes there will be minimal, if any, negative impacts on the above-
described criteria
, 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to
- be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in .
relation to surrounding uses. ,
The new offices will be located within an existing structure (Vail Tennis
Center). Staff believes this is positive as it does not increase the number
of structures built in Ford Park, nor does it effect the existing open space
areas of the park. During the public process for the Ford Park
Management Plan, numerous concerns were raised regarding new
buildings in the park and the negative impacts they would have on open
space.
Staff believes the additional office use will have minimal, if any, negative
impacts on the existing or potential uses of Ford Park. Staff does not
believe that the character of the park will be negatively impacted. The Vail
Tennis Center currently accommodates an office with minimal impacts on
the park. Staff does not believe that the additional offices will effect the
active and passive recreation nature of Ford Park.
B. FINDINGS
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before
granting a conditional use e~ rmit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes
, of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
6
•
~
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the applicant's
request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of four new offices and one
meeting room to be located in the Vail Tennis Center in Ford Park subject to the following
findings:
~
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the General
, Use zone district. -
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be • operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the
conditional use permit section of the zoning code.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to grant an approval of the
applicanYs request, staff would recommend that the following condition be placed upon
the approval:
1. That the Vail Recreation District require at least five employees to park their
vehicles in the Vail Transportation Center and utilize the pedestrian path to
access the new offices. This would mitigate the increased parking demand
resulting from the issuance of the conditional use permit.
F:\EVERYONE\PEC\MEMOS\98\VRDCUP.223
7
+ Q r I ~ !
~,j-D pv~ 6 ~ °Ir,-~a'~ o
~
~
..r ;
, o
,!J• ! ~ !
1
~ - - - - - , - - - - - ~
O (,J 5'
~
~ .s.. 1.~. ?
1r Yl
•'f: C ~o s ` ~ P
IL /0 ~ rEAr'I
- - - -
a- , yiitjt~
b Doo)T--
9 ,
~ , .
I e 0 Q f'i ~ r I ~n 0 Q/`~ . ~ ~ , n/1 f-1 ~ Y~ ~ •
FEB-20-98 FRI 3:31 PM CAST FAX N0, 970 927 8456 P. 1/ 1
Attention: Mayors $z Managers jt'
From: Jacque Whi sl
DRAFT
Colorada Association of Ski Towns
Legislative Meetiug/.Reception
Niarch 19,1998
AGENDA
N'UUN-2:00PM Legislative Update at CML Offices
Jan Gerstenbexger andlor Sam 1V,[amet
1660 Lincoln, Suite 2100
2:00 PM Larry Kallenberger
Excess Revenues Stra#egies
3:QQPM CAST Business Meeting
A.pproval af 1I23 Min,utes
Discussion of i,.egislative Positions
ADJOURN
5:00y7:00PM Legislatiwe Reception
Brown Palace
. 7:00-9:00PM Dinner wath Legislators
There will be no pragraxn on Friday, March 20. A reminder
to make room reservations at the Comfurt Inn and to call me
xegarding luneh and dinner xesearvations at 970-927-2414.
E.C.R.T.A. ID:9707480710 FEB 19'98 8:38 No.003 P.02
OiAlt
Eaule ounty R t
• j
Eaglc ('ounty Sales TRx Ci i t
Transpnrtation
1.996 Actuul 1 1997 Estimate 1998 F.stimat
Englc Valley Transportdtion (90%) $2,521,967 $3,206,485 $3,430,939
E-tgle Valley'1'rails (10%) 280,096 356,398 381,346
Koaring Fork Vtillcy Transp. (901/0)2 157,591 183,717 196,577
Roaring Fork Vallcy Trails ( l 0°/u) z 17,.510 20,414 21.842
$2,977, l (i4 $3,767,014 $4,030,704
1. )ilcvcn months of col)eciiori (FeUriiary-Deccmbcr) per modif,ed accrual accountizig usea by the
C'ount.y.
2. These funds are collccteci in the El Jebel ancl Rasalt area and must; be spenl for transPvitation and
trails purposes in the LI Jcbcl and 13asalt area.
13r-achniark. I'lazu I1204 (P7I1) 748-0702
l'lJ. Bux I564 1i1,Y ('I70) 74,1'-0710
Avon, (`(1 XI (20-I.SC4 r~-mlleil.' mn.tiilit. ~ a vctil.nc~I
l(~
~
n
C~
Hennetta (Holly) Simmenroth 2/18/98
10 Cora Lane
Chester, N.J. 07930
Owner: Lifthouse Condo #412
Lionshead Circle
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Town Council
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 8165
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The attached letter was submitted to the Vail Town Council on November 11,1997. Since then I have
attended a meeting on Sunday, Feb 15,1998 at the Vail Public Library Community Room to review the
"Height and Mass Concepts and Alternatives" as proposed by the Study Committee hired by the Town of
Vail. The narrowing of walkways through Lionshead in the name of "increased commerce" is absolutely
frigktening! A Survey, citing 40% of the visitors to Vail do not ski but enjoy shopping a main activity,
was given as a rational to narrow the walkways to approximately 30 feet. Lionshead has always been the
main Vail "Skier Drop-off' due to easy access to the gondola and lugh speed quad chair. After 15
years of watching the transportation in the parking garage unload in the mornings and return in the
evenings, I can assure you, almost all of the people entering Lionshead go directly to the lift ticket booth ,
purchase lift tickets, and head up ihe mountain. Narrowing the walkways will not encourage them to
purchase tee slurts and othtr tourist paraphernalia. Kennys Ski Shop is one of the few prosperous
enterprises in Lionshead because it serves the needs of this transient population. Bart &Yettes does
equally as well. But, for the most part, when these people return from skiing, they head on home because
we do not offer them a comfortable ski lodge, and enough suitable amenities to make them want to stay in
Lionshead to visit and shop; The "Lionshead Core Redevelopment Program" outlined in the letter above
creates more congestion and does nothing to serve those daily visitors.
Common sense leads me to the next conclusion. If the transient population creates too much wngestion
and dces not increase the revenue basis for the town of Vail, the alternative of removing the parking
facility and building a five star hotel in thai location would create more "live beds", and recbuce the traffic
congestion problem simultaneously. The current Study (;ommittee claims no major hotel conccrn wou?d
consider that a suitable locarion . I urge you to revisit this concept and solicit the major hotel chains
directly to obtain written proposals or letters of denial. To service day visitors, a parking gazage could
be built a the west end of Lionshead with adequate walkways to the gondola, and the existing Sunbird
lodge and old gondola building area could be rebuilt as a lodge to contain all skiers comfortably and
provide the much needed open space area at the base of the mountain. These are very broad concepts,
and I humbly submit them for your consideration.
Thank You for the in depth reviews you are making of this project, and for reading my letter.
TrulyYours,
Henrietta "Holly" Simmenroth
.
Henrietta (Holly) Simmenroth 11/29/97
10 Cora Lane
Chester, N.J. 07930
Owner: Lifthouse Condo #412
Lionshead Circle,
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Town Council
Town Of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Ladies and Gentlemen,
This letter is in protest to the recently received preliminary plans of Lionshead that Vail Associates will be
presenting to the town for approval. The document refened to is the "LIONSHEAD CORE
REDr,"VELOPMEN'I' PROGRAM SIJN5IARY" dated 9/23/97 depicting 44 CONDOS, 6 PENTHOUSE
CONDOS, and a 127 ROOM HOTEL. The plans indicate the buildings will be more than 6 stories in
height with existing corridors of traffic narrowing down to alleys to the gondola and chair #8 at the base.
Before proceeding, I would like to introduce myself and explain my concerns as they relate to me
personally. I am known as "Holly", am a school nurse and health educator, and have been visiting the
Vail Valley for more than 20 years on a regular basis staying at the Lifthouse Condos which are managed
by Packy Walker. During the first 15 years, I was able to save enough money for a down payment on a
condo and waited for one of the top floor mountain facing units to come up for sale. On August 19,1991,
my dream came true. Although other units in the building not facing the mountain were listed on the
market for about one half the price, I purchased unit #412, a mountain view unit from which I can lay on
the living room couch and -watch the skiers descend the slopes. I had always anticipated that in my
retirement, just a few years away, I would be able to spend much more time in my Lifthouse condo
enjoying the spectacular view of the mountain. I am sure my story as a Lionshead condo owner is not
unique. The above captioned plan will obstruct the view of many other condo owners in the area, not only
shattering our dreains of relaxing and taking in the beautiful natural environment of the mountains
through our windows, but also reducing the monetary value of the units in direct proportion to the loss of
the view. I realize there aze Town of Vail View corridors set forth in Chapter 18.73 of the Municipal
Code, and private views not identified in the code aze not protected by TOV regulations. At this time of
drastic change, I implore you to revisit these View Corridors creating new, wider View Corridors in
Lionshead and, as an eauitable solution to amend the Municipal Code to not allow any new building to
be higher than the e~stzng stru~ti:a~ Fvithow a ya.xaance gK~.n*Qd atter Qbtaar.:=~mwEc: al 3f a11 propM
owners which would be effected bv obstruction of view of the mountain or the Gore range
A"Five Star" hotel increasing the "Live Bed" capacity would certainly enhance the area, but I fail to see
why Lionshead needs 44 more condos and 6 penthouse condos as the proposal indicates. A few years ago
when VA officials met with hotel consultants to consider the feasibiliry of bringing either a grand hotel,
condominium units with retail, a mixed use boutique hotel or a boutique hotel with condoxniniums and
retail into the heart of Lionshead, the study showed the core site was not well suited physically to hotel
development because of lack of size, poor access, etceteras. In the Six Policy Objectives identified by the
Town Council as a foundarion for the planning process, improved access and circulation was identified
as one of the major needs. Since the gondola was moved to the base of the mountain, next to the bridge,
the skier traffic at the base has become much more congested requiring more open space in that azea, not
less. The Lionshead Master Plan Stage II- Program Development Phase elicited public responses in the
format of a"Wish List", obviously appropriately named, as numerous responses addressed the need for
more open pnblic space not less.
• e
,
Regarding the Redevelopment Project, Mr. David Corbin, Vice President of VA Rea1 Estate Group is
reported as saying the obvious benefits to Vail Associates would be the increased number of skiers, use of
the ski school and its retail sales. The benefits to the Town of Vail would be increased collection of ski
lift taxes, lodging taxes, properry taYes and sales tax. Regarding the Lionshead Core Redevelopment
Program Summary dated 9/23/97, I would like to say, the increase in revenues to the VA and the TOV
will be great, but if this plan gces into effect without amelioration, the loss of aesthetics to the communiry
of Lionshead will be devastating.
Truly Yours,
~
7
G y7n~---
Henrietta (Holly) Simmenroth