The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998-06-09 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1998 2:00 P.M. AT TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon, to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1• Vail Valley Exchange Discussion Regarding Council/Sister City Merv Lapin relationship. (15 mins.) 2. PEC/DRB Review. (15 mins.) 3• Red Sandstone Employee Housing Development. (30 mins.) Andy Knudtsen Tom Stevens BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On June 3, 1998, the Design Review Board reviewed the project and gave its approval of the architecture. Staff will return to the DRB on June 17 for final approval of the site plan, once engineering details are resolved. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review materials to be presented to the Council and give final approval of the project. 4• Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. This work session is intended Russell Forrest to continue the discussion of building height scenarios, development Dominic Mauriello standards, and related impacts. The Lionshead Master Plan team will be Ethan Moore presenting several scenarios and the PEC recommendations on building Dave Kenyon .height. This discuss with continue on July 7, 1998 and will include economic impacts and benefits. See memo in packet. (1 hr., 30 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: No action is requested at this time. Please provide feedback and direction to staff and project consultants on building height scenarios and development standards. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Please refer to memorandum in Council packet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction as necessary. 5• Village Core Construction Update. (10 mins.) Larry Grafel 6• Information Update. (10 mins.) 7• Council Reports. (10 mins.) Other. (10 mins.) 9• Adjournment - 6:10 p.m. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: kr+LL i imra Httt HrrKUXIMA I t AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) I I 1 1- 1 1 ( THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSlON WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/16/98, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6,123198, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/16/98, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. I I I I I I I Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1998 3124/98 COUNCIL STORAGE/OFFICE PAM: Is there an area in the municipal building where Mike Jewett will coordinate a tour with Sybiil, Kevin and Mike Rose to tour SPACE Council members can store materials, have access to a possible options in the Vail Transportation Center and the Lionshead Sybill Navas phone, and arrange meetings? Transportation Center the week of June 2nd. 4/21/98 CORRIDOR NOISE BOB MCLAURINlGREG MORRISON: Althaugh noise Bob will write to Col. King wlCSP. Kevin Foley/Councii "barriers" are inciuded on CDOT'S 20 year STIP, the Council is interested in a more pro-active stance. Should we be considering a more muiti-faceted approach, i.e., request a step up in enforcement by CSP, request a lowering of the speed limit to 55 through this corridor, involve our own PD, enlist the aid of all TOV residents in calling the 1-800 # to REPORT A GOOD DRIVER, etc. 4/28l98 DOWN JUNCTION BIKE PATH LARRY: This item was discussed again at the recent Eagle The study wiil continue until June 15. Kevin Foley County Regional Transportation Authority meeting - is there a time line on the wildlife study that's being conducted? What is the status? 5119198 EAST VAIL LIGHTS LARRY: 2 of the 6 East Vail lights are still out. What is the CDOT has repaired 6 of the 8 lights. There is still a break in the service Kevin Foley status? line and will be repaired when CDOT can re-schedule their crew back here. June 5, 1998, Page1 5/26/98 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AND LARRY: With the current construction for heated pavers in LARGER PRINT SIGNS FOR THE VTRC - the VTRC, clear, concise, readabie, user-friendly signs are Ludwig Kurz needed. Current signs contain too small print (on the concrete supports) and we need to step up our efforts to compliment the progress of the V1'RC project progress on a daily basis. June 5, 1998, Page 2 Updated 6/09 10am PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, June 8, 1998 FINAL AGENDA Project Orientation / LUNCH - Community Development Department 11:30p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT John Schofield Greg Moffet Galen Aasland Diane Golden Ann Bishop (left at 5:30 pm) Brian Doyon Tom Weber Site Visits : 12:30 p.m. 1. Vail Associates - Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st. 2. Adam - 706 Forest Road 3. Grand Traverse - Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision Filing #1. 4. Dayco - 1315 Spraddle Creek Road 5. Rad Five L.L.C. - 4469 Timber Falls Court 6. Accardo - 1998 Sunburst Drive 7. Bass - 345 Mill Creek Circle Driver: George . ~ . NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearinp - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the expansion of the front entry, located at 2005 West Gore Creek Drive/Unplatted. Applicant: Tom Thomson, represented by John Perkins Planner: Christie Barton MOTION: Galen Aasiand SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED 2. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the construction of a residential addition, located at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd. Applicant: Nate Accardo, represented by Fritzlsn, Pierce, Briner Planner: George Ruther MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITlON: *VAIL rowN 1 Updated 6/09 10am 1. That the construction signage be brought into compliance with the Town of Vail sign regulations. 3. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to ailow for the conversion of a garage to GRFA, and for the expansion of the mechanical room, located at 345 Mill Creek Circie/Lot 14, Block 1, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Lee M. Bass, represented by Snowden and Hopkins Planner: George Ruther MOTION: Ann Bishop SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED WITFi 1 CONDITION: 1. That the Town of Vail Public Works Department review and approve the proposed parking plan. 4. A worksession to review an amendment to a previously approved plan for the Timber Falis Development, located at 4469 Timber Falis Court/unplatted. Applicant: RAD Five L.L.C., represented by Greg Amsden Planner: Dominc Mauriello WORKSESSION - NO VOTE 5. A request for an extension of a conditional use permit for the Lionshead Children's Tent, generaliy located next to the Lionshead Children's ski school/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st. Applicant: Vail Associates, represented by David Thorpe Planner: Christie Barton TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22, 1998 6. A request for a minor subdivision to amend a building envelope, to allow for the installation of a gazebo, located at 1315 Spraddle Creek Road/Lot 12, Spraddle Creek Estates. Applicant: Dayco Holding Corporation, represented by David Argo of No Name Architects Pianner: Dominic Mauriello MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED 7. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District #22, Grand Traverse, and a request for a major subdivision for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Dauphinais-Mosefey Subdivision Filing #1. Applicant: Patrick Dauphinais Planner: George Ruther 2 Updated 6/09 10am MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0 APPROVAL FOR RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL- MAJOR SUBDIVISION MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 5-0 APPROVAL FOR F2ECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL WITH 3 CONDITIONS - SDD 422 MAJOR AMENDMENT 1. That the maximum garage credit for each of the primary units constructed in the development not exceed six hundred (600) square feet, unless and EHU is constructed on the lot, in which case, an additional 600 sq. ft. garage credit be allowed. 2. That the maximum nurnber of outdoor lights permitted on each of the lots in the development not exceed 15 lights total. 8. A request for a front setback variance, to allow for a proposed residential addition, located at 706 Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Village 6th. Applicant: Nancy Adam, repressnted by Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner Architects Planner: Christie Barton MOTION: Ann Bishop SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 4-0 (Tom Weber recused) APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: 1. That the applicant shall maintain a limit of disturbance line as shown on the site plan. No building additions shall be allowed beyond this line in the future. This limit of disturbance and any associated variances will become obsolete if the duptex is demolished and rebuilt. 9. A request for a worksession to discuss a major amendment to Special Development District #6, Vail Village tnn, to allow for a hotel redevelopment, located at 100 East Meadow Drive, Lots M and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22, 1998 10. A request for a side setback variance, to aliow for the construction of an additional garage, located at 813 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Liz & Luc Meyer, represented by William Pierce Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22, 1998 3 Updated 6/09 10am 11. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a bed and breakfast operation, located at 1779 Sierra Trail/Lot 18, Vail Village West Filing #1. Applicant: Malin Johnsdotter/ Robert Zeltman Pianner: Christie Barton TABLED UNTIL JULY 27, 1998 12. A request for a final review of a major amendment to SDD #4, to ailow for a fractional fee club and a change to the approved Development Plan, located at 1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A. Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby Robinson Pianner: George Ruther WITHDRAWN 13. Information Update 14. Approval of May 18, 1998 minutes. TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22, 1998 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published June 5, 1998 in the Vail Trail. 4 1 Updated 6/02 1 pm PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, June 8, 1998 AGENDA Project Orientation / LUNCH - Community Development Department 11:30p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits : 12:30 p.m. 1. Vail Associates - Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st. 2. Adam - 706 Forest Road 3. Grand Traverse - Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision Filing #1. 4. Dayco - 1315 Spraddle Creek Road 5. Rad Five L.L.C. - 4469 Timber Falls Court 6. Accardo - 1998 Sunburst Drive 7. Bass - 345 Mill Creek Circle Driver: George GNA`-1 NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearina - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the expansion of the front entry, located at 2005 West Gore Creek Drive/Unplatted. Applicant: Tom Thomson, represented by John Perkins Planner: Christie Barton 2. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the construction of a residential addition, located at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd. Applicant: Nate Accardo, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner Planner: George Ruther 3. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for the conversion of a garage to GRFA, and for the expansion of the mechanical room, located at 345 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 14, Block 1, Vail Village 1st. Applicant: Lee M. Bass, represented by Snowden and Hopkins Planner: George Ruther *VZ TOf9N O1 r Updated 6/02 1 pm 4. A worksession to review an amendment to a previously approved plan for the Timber Falls Development, located at 4469 Timber Falls Court/unplatted. Applicant: RAD Five L.L.C., represented by Greg Amsden Planner: Dominc Mauriello 5. A request for an extension of a conditional use permit for the Lionshead Children's Tent, generally located next to the Lionshead Children's ski school/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1 st. Applicant: Vail Associates, represented by David Thorpe Planner: Christie Barton 6. A request for a minor subdivision to amend a building envelope, to allow for the installation of a gazebo, located at 1315 Spraddle Creek Road/Lot 12, Spraddle Creek Estates. Applicant: Dayco Holding Corporation, represented by David Argo of No Name Architects Planner: Dominic Mauriello 7. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District #22, Grand Traverse, and a request for a major subdivision for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision Filing #1. Applicant: Patrick Dauphinais Planner: George Ruther 8. A request for a front setback variance, to allow for a proposed residential addition, located at 706 Forest Road/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village 6th. Applicant: Nancy Adam, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner Architects Planner: Christie Barton 9. A request for a worksession to discuss a major amendment to Special Development District #6, Vail Village Inn, to allow for a hotel redevelopment, located at 100 East Meadow Drive, Lots M and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22, 1998 10. A request for a side setback variance, to allow for the construction of an additional garage, located at 813 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Liz & Luc Meyer, represented by William Pierce Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL JUNE 22, 1998 2 _ Updated 6/02 lpm 11. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a bed and breakfast operation, located at 1779 Sierra Trail/Lot 18, Vail Village West Filing #1. Applicant: Malin Johnsdotter/ Robert Zeltman Planner: Christie Barfon TABLED UNTIL JULY 27, 1998 12. A request for a final review of a major amendment to SDD #4, to allow for a fractional fee club and a change to the approved Development Plan, Iocated at 1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A. Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby Robinson Planner: George Ruther WITHDRAWN 13. Information Update 14. Approval of May 18, 1998 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published June 5, 1998 in the Vail Trail. 3 • ra Agenda last revised 06/0410 am DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, June 3, 1998 3:00 P.M. PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Brent Alm Ann Bishop (PEC) Clark Brittain Bill Pierce Hans Woldrich SITE VISITS 2:00 pm 1. McDonald's - 2172 N. Frontage Road. 2. Dayco - 1315 Spraddle Creek Road. 3. Shannon - 245 Forest Road. 4. Pownell - 267 Rockledge Road. 5. Ballesteros - 600 Vail Valley Drive. 6. Northwoods elevator Building F2 - 600 Vail Valley Drive. Driver: George PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm 1. Red Sandstone Affordable Housing Development - Conceptual review of 18 unit Dominic development proposal. 945 Red Sandstone Road/Part of Parcel A, Block D, Lionsridge Filing 1. Applicant: Town of Vail CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 2. McDortalds - Exterior changes. Dominic 2172 N. Frontage Rd./ Lot 2, Vail Das Schone #3 Applicant: George Greenwald MOTION:CIark Brittain SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 4-0 APPROVED 3. Scolnick residence - Conceptual review of redesign of a single family residence. Christie 2935 Basingdale Blvd./Lot 19, Block 6, Intermountain. Applicant: Jay & Sheryl Skolnick, represented by John Railton CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE *VM row,1 . 4. Powneil residence - Dormer addition. Christie 267 Rockledge Road/Lot 14, Block 7, Vail Village 1st. Applicant: Dick and Mary Pownell MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONSENT APPROVED 5. Shannon residence - Addition to a primary/secondary residence. Dominic 245 Forest Road/Lot 22, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Mike Shannon, represented by William Reslock CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 6. Dayco Holding Corporation - Conceptual review for a gazebo. Dominic 1315 Spraddle Creek Road/Lot 12, Spraddle Creek Estates. Applicant: David Argo, No Name Architects CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 7. Ballesteros residence - Exterior additions and interior remodel. Christie 600 Vail Valley Drive/Northwoods, Vail Village 7th. Applicant: Ray Story MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: 1. That the railings be of a vertical quatity. 8. Mountain Haus - Final review of the revised west entry addition. George 292 East Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Stephanie Lord MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONSENT APPROVED 9. Yaros - Final review. George 5119 Black Bear Lane/Lot 8, Block 2, Gore Creek Subdivision. Applicant: Dr. Ronald Yaros, represented by John Perkins MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: 1. That any trees Iost due to construction be replaced on a foot per foot basis. 10. JAG Vail residence - Final review of a primary/secondary residence. George 4969 Meadow Drive/Lot 11, Block 5, Bighorn 5th. Applicant: JAG Vail, represented by Lynn Fritzlen MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0 (Bill Pierce abstained) APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: 1. That the grass-crete turnaround be indicated on the building permit plans. 2 11. Northwoods Building F2 - New elevator stair tower and exterior heated stair. Christie 600 Vail Valley Drive/Vail Valley 7th. Applicant: Northwoods Condo Association, represented by Tom Weber MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONSENT APPROVED 12. BMS Partnership - Conceptual review of final design of secondary unit. Christie 24 Beaver Dam Road (45 Forest Road)\Lot 33, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Steven James Riden, AIA MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONSENT APPROVED 12. Gore Creek Grille - Amend previous approval. Christie 223 Gore Creek Drive/Block 513, Vail Village 1st. Applicant: T. Michael Ditch WITHDRAWN Staff Approvals Krediet residence - Minor changes to approved plans. George 226 Forest Road/Lot 11, Block 7, Vail Village 1st. Applicant: John Krediet Chester residence - Interior conversion. Christie 395 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 19, Block 1, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: E.B. and Kay Chester Wetcher residence - Window addition. Dominic 4496 Meadow Drive, #1506/Timberfalls. Applicant: Mr. Wetcher Austria Haus - Exterior window change to retail space "B." George 242 East Meadow Drive/Part of Tract C, Block 5-D, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Austria Haus Development Group Ridgeview Square Townhomes - Minor alteration. Christie 4506 Spruce Way/Ridgeview Square Subdivision. Applicant: Janice Cuccia, Manager Ridgeview Square Townhomes Jacobi residence - Window modification. Dominic 2009 Chamonix Lane/Resub Lot 28, Buffehr Creek. Applicant: Jean Paul & Lillian Jacobi Larson residence - Changes to approved plans. Dominic 2685 Larkspur Lane/Lot 8, Block 2, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Eric and Ellie Larson Vergara residence - Addition of soft cover canopy over deck. Dominic 2399 Chamonix Lane/Lot 18, Block A, Vail das Schone #1. Applicant: Joseph Vergara 3 VailGlo Lodge - Revised signage. Dominic 701 West Lionshead Circle/VailGlo Lodge. Applicant: Craig Holzfaster Mountain Haus - Window addition. Dominic 292 E. Meadow Drive, Mountain Haus Unit 106/Block 5, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Alberto Sanchez Head residence - Change to approved plans. George 325 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Martha Head Vail Mountain School - Window replacement and air condition installation. George 3160 North Frontage/Part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Valley 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Mountain School Ferguson residence - Interior conversion. George 1295 Westhaven Circle/Lot 48, Glen Lyon. Applicant: David Ferguson The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 4 r MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Team DATE: June 9, 1998 SUBJECT: Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan A. Purpose of Worksession: This work session is intended to continue the discussion of building height scenarios and related impacts. The Lionshead Master Plan team will be presenting several scenarios and the PEC recommendations on building height. This discussion with continue on July 7, 1998 and will include economic impacts and benefits. B. Proposed Schedule: June 23, 1998 - Council Worksession - Employee Housing - preliminary review July 7, 1998 - Council Worksession - Discussion - Evening Meeting - Decision - Economic analysis - Building height scenarios - Impacts of scenarios - Benefits of increased height and density - Carrying capacity - Development standards - Design concepts C. Staff Recommendation on Building Height: The proposed building height guidelines for the Lionshead Master Plan are outlined as follows: 1. Maximum by-right height limit based upon geographic location of property within the study area. a. Area "A" -(see map) - This area is characterized by existing single family and duplex homes. It is proposed that any new development in this area conform to this fabric and be limited to the existing development standards in place (maximum height of 33' for a sloping roof). b. Area "B" -(see map) - This area is currently open space, located south of 1 ]TINNO 409, Gore Creek and is characterized by wetlands, steep embankments and undeveloped open space. It is proposed that this area be maintained as an open space resource, with no structures permitted. However, any open, recreation-rype support structures that the Town of Vail may see as appropriate in the future shall be limited in height to 1-story, plus a roof. c. Area "C" -(see map) - This area is characterized by the commercial core and multi-family residential uses. It is recommended that structures in this area have a by-right height limit of five stories, plus a roof. Structures in this area also are eligible for bonus heights based upon their orientation and conformance to pertormance criteria. 2. Roofs. The roof height allowance is defined as the increase in height from the maximum permitted eve height, to the ridge line of the roof. a. SloAed roof reauirement. Due to the desire for a consistent, high quality, alpine architectural style in the Lionshead area, it is proposed that flat roofs no longer be allowed on any new construction, building additions or rehabilitation to existing buildings. b. By-right roof allowance. In conjunction with the requirement for a sloping roof, it is recommended that every building be required to have a minimum 5/12 pitch roof, with a maximum by-right roof height of 14 feet, (this is based on the height of a 5/12 pitched roof on a typical 65' wide, double- loaded building). 3. Bonus Heights. The proposed height bonuses for Area "C" of the Lionshead study area are divided into two sections - additional stories (building height before the roof starts), and additional roof height. a. Additional stories: Any structures that are predominately oriented north- south, (with average double-loaded corridor), are eligible for a bonus sixth story, according to conformance with the performance criteria. b. Bonus roaf heiqht allowances: Based on the predominant orientation of the building and the conformance to performance criteria, it is recommended that the following bonus roof allowances be created: 1. 9/12 pitch with a maximum roof height of 25' (this height is based on a 9/12 roof on a typical 65' wide double-loaded building). This bonus roof height would be available for all buildings in Area "C" regardtess of their orientation, if they meet the performance criteria. This roof height will allow for the creation of a narrower "loft" story inside the roof. 2. 12/12 pitch with a maximum roof height of 33' (this height is based on a 12/12 roof on a typical 65' wide double-loaded building). This bonus roof height would be available for any building in Area "C" that is predominately oriented north-south and meets the pertormance criteria. This roof height will allow for the creation of 2 , an additional story, plus a loft space inside the roof. 4. Exclusions. The following exclusions to by-right or bonus building heighis are proposed in order to protect the character and visual quality of certain spaces within the Lionshead Study Area. It is suggested that building setbacks, build-to lines and architectural step-backs will be detailed in the architectural and .site guidelines. a. Any building adjoining the Gore Creek stream corridor or adjoining the ski yard shall be limited to a 4-story maximum permitted eve height, and must conform to the architectural design guidelines for buildings fronting these areas. However, this is not intended to prevent a building from attaining its bonus height after stepping back from the restricted building face. b. Any part of a building that is south facing, north facing, or adjoining the Lionshead retail mall area shall be limited to a 5-story maximum permitted eve height. This is not intended to prevent a building from attaining its bonus height after stepping back from the restricted building face. c. All buildings in Area "C" shall conform to the Lionshead architectural and site design guidelines, which may influence the initial eve height and building step-back requirements. d. All building shall respect the established public view corridors. 5. Maximum Building Height Synopsis. The following maximum attainable building heights under the above proposals are based on an assumed 11.5' floor-to-floor • height. a. 71.5 Feet - Maximum By-Right building height, with no bonus story and no bonus roof height (57.5' for five stories, plus 14' for the roof). b. 82.5 Feet - Building height with no bonus stories and the initial bonus roof height, (57.5' for five stories, plus 25' for the roof). c. 90.5 Feet - Building height with no bonus stories and the maximum bonus roof height, allowed only for north-south oriented buildings (57.5' for five stories, plus 33' for the roof). d. 102 Feet - Building height with bonus sixth floor and maximum bonus roof height, allowed only for north-south oriented buildings (69' for six stories, plus 33' for the roof). 3 44, ~M . . Ay _ ~ t x~ _ i _ ` s - - ~ ~ O~ X ~ _ ~ ~ . D 0 r ~ . ~ ZONE 'A' v . . . . . ~r~r y zom as ~ ti . , . W ' Staff Recommendation ~ t , . i ~ D. PEC Recommendation on Building Height: . Lionshead Master Plan Comparison of Recommendations April 21,1998 Proposal for Building Steff Recommendation PEC Recommendatfon Councll Height Actlon Average floor-to-floor 11.5' 11.5' height 2one A 33' (sloping roof) 33' (sloping roof) Building height based on geographic zone Zone B 1 story, plus roof 1 story, plus roof Building height based on for recreation-type structures, if any for recrea[ion-rype structures, if any geographic zone 2one C-1, By Rlght 5 stories + 5:12 roof (71.5') E/W Building Building height based on - 3 stories + 5:12 roof (48.51) geographic zone: N/S Buildings (commercial core) - 5 stories + 9;12 roof ($2.5') Zone C-2, By Rlght 5 stories + 5:12 roof (71.5') E/VV Building Building height based on - 5 stories + 9:12 roof (82.5') geographic zone: N/S Buildings (frontage road) - 6 stories + 9:12 roof (94') Zone C-3, By Right 5 stories + 5:12 root (71.5') Within reasonable parameters, this area shall be Building height based on allowed to contain greater density and building geographic zone: height for the development of EHU's, AU's, and. (west area) office space. 5 Proposal for Building Staff Recommendation PEC Recommendation Council Height Action Zone C-1, Bonus E/W Buildings - E/W Buildings Building height based on -5 stories +9:12 roof (82.5') - 4 stories + 5:12 roof (60') geographic zone: N/S Buildings - N/S Buildings (commercial core) - 6 stories + 9:12 roof (94') - 7 stories + 9:12 roof (105.5') - 6 stories + 12:12 roof (102') Zone C-2, Bonus E/W Buildings - E/W Buildings Building height based on -5 stories + 9:12 roof (82.5') - 7 stories + 9:12 roof (105.5') geographic zone: N/S Buildings - N/S Buildings (frontage road) - 6 stories + 9:12 roof (94') - 8 stories + 9;12 roof (117.0') - 6 stories + 12:12 roof (102') 2one C-3, Bonus E/W Buildings - Within reasonable parameters, this area shall be Building height based on -5 stories + 9; 12 roof (82.5') allowed to contain greater density and building geographic zone: N/S Buildings - height for the development of EHU's, AU's, and (west area) - 6 stories + 9:12 roof (94') office space. - 6 stories + 12:12 roof (102') Buildings adjoining creek Building must step back after 4th story. Building must step back after 4th story or ski yard Buildings adjoining main Building must step back after Sth story Building must step back after 4th story east/west pedestrlan mall Existing Buildings Allowed to be rebuilt to existing number of stories with Allowed to be rebuilt to existing number of stories 11.5' average floor-to-floor height with 11.5' average floor-to-floor height Bonus Height or Equal square footage of bonus floors must exist on site Equal square footage of bonus ffoors must exist Performance Criteria as EHU's, FFU's, or AU's on site as EHU's. AU's, or office space • t , PEC Recommendation . • ~ ~ , x fe ! { fyi 1 ~ ~ y ~ ' ~1 N ~ ~ . t 5 1 I e ~ ~t(~lT .f, •~`;.i~ ~ - :.`~:.~~ct 1('.r' ' ~ , ; ~ s_ h~J-r ~ - . ` ~ _ S ; ` _ 1 ~ . r~ _ ' ~ ti ..s~"-*'+ h ~ ~ - ' ° - ~ . •J 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ f ' i =_=~'~.r= fi ti r' -il • ~ - - - ' r t ~r ~ , ~ . ~ _ ~ ~ ` t 'i i ~ _ _ f- • ~ ~ ,t ~ t } _ :s - ~ ~ / .~:a.• ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~~~~i. • ~ ~ _ ~ . , . ( r 1 ' ".•p.: , i ! • i.:. r~-' ~ 1,= t J. `'p ° r , 1F: _ ~ J . " ~ • . . ~ ~ ~ ~ • . ~ s _ t : ' ' . - ~ , N ~ y, ] ~y ~ • - T l ( ~ ' . _ 1 ~ ~ q 1 _ ~ ~ L~/ . ~~4\~i •':,iii ~ I zaNE $w' , - . . _ - - c ~ _ J: _ ~ I~ .?~yr ~y i~^';.~ { _ . , - ZONE '8' S • a •`~~'r,~"~" xQNE 'C-T 1 ZpNE•C'2' ~ 20NH'C-y ~ i LtON3HEAD eU1LDINCi FEIGHT ZONES ~ ' i ~ i 7 . E. Benefits and Impacts of Building Height Scenarios: Attached to this memo are detailed spreadsheets and graphs showing the potential impacts different building height scenarios. A detailed presentation on these spreadsheets will.be made at this meeting. F:\EVERYONE\COUNCI L\MEMOS\98\LH..609 . 8 - LIONSHEAD MASTER PLAN PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT DATA MODEL Wednesday, June 03, 1998 Prepared By: DESIGNWORKSHOP Contents 1. Introduction and notes II. Description of projected development scenarios III. Table of assumptions IV. Development scenario summary tables V. Comparative development scenario graphs VI. Complete development scenario data tables - I.Introduction A. The nurpose and context of this study: This study is an order of magnitude analysis intended to present a general picture of what might occur in the future of Lionshead given a set of development assumptions (included in this packet) and a set of given development scenarios. The assumptions used in this model are based upon an analysis of existing development trends and patterns in Lionshead, a study of the type and size of differing resort lodging products being built in the market today, and a consideration of the constraints current recommendations of the Lionshead Master plan and architectural guidelines will have on any projected development scenarios. . The six individual development scenarios are built around three building height scenarios (four stories, five stories, and six stories, each scenario also including a roo fl, with each height study broken into two analyses, one weighted towards the creation of Dwelling Units, the other weighted towards the creation of Fractional Fee Units. The development scenazios are also based on an analysis of which properties in Lionshead are likely to sustain new development, redevelopment, expansion of existing development, and/or ground level retail expansion. IMPORTANT NOTE: Each complete scenario data table includes a forecast of what would happen given the redevelopment of all the properties in Lionshead. It is important to note that many of these properties are not anticipated to change in any substantial way and are therefore not included in the individual scenario summaries or comparative graphs. B. General Notes 1. For detailed information on individual scenario data and assumptions, refer to complete model data set. 2. Total population, employee, and skier day counts represent the complete developed or redeveloped project, and do not subtract out existing employee or visitor populations. 3. The model averages do not include GRFA as a development constraint. 4. The model figures aze based on NET saleable square footage, having subtracted out space lost to common areas and an "Architectural Design Guideline" building mass reduction factor. 5. Current employee Generation Figures are based upon employee generation rates and data from the 1991 RRC "Employment Generation Rates" study. 6. The skier day generation data is based upon an analysis of all residential products in a given property, adjusted for product type occupancy rates. This skier day generation data is PER ANNUM. 7. The people per unit and total people per building numbers are adjusted to the existing average occupancy rates for the following product types: a. Dwelling unit- 30% occupancy rate (averaged across entire year) b. Fractional fee unit- 75% occupancy rate (averaged across entire year) c. Accommodation unit- 65% occupancy rate (averaged across entire year) A 100% occupancy rate of any of the above product types can be seen by looking at the "pillow count" in the individual scenario complete data set. 2 8. As explained above, the different development scenarios described above reflect two different - extremes for each floor height scenario- one utilizing primarily dwelling unit creation, and one utilizing primarily fractional fee unit creation. While the DU and FFU figures produce the same population counts and unit counts, they differ in occupancy rates. The actual amount of DU's created vs. FFU's created is very difficult to forecast and will likely be somewhere between the two scenarios described above. 9. Density calculations utilize dwelling units only. Fractional Fee units and accommodation units are not counted towazds density. II. Description of projected development scenarios: Scenario A-1: Four story building plus a roof, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development. . Scenario A-2: Four story building plus a roof, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development and redevelopment. Scenario B-1: Five story building plus a roof, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development. Scenario B-2: Five story building plus a roof, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development and redevelopment. Scenario C-1: Six story building plus a roof, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development. Scenario C-2: Six story building plus a roof, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development and redevelopment. ' - II. Development Projection Data Assumptions As stated earlier, the following development data assumptions are based upon an analysis of existing development trends and patterns in Lionshead, a study of the type and size of differing resort lodging products being built in the mazket today, and a consideration of the constraints current recommendations of the Lionshead Master plan and architectural guidelines will have on any projected development scenazios. These assumptions are utilized by the digital model to produce the data found on the scenario summary pages. 1. Ground floor coverage percentage of gross site area- varies with site. 2. Second floor and above percentage coverage of first floor. This percentage value takes into account the probable first floor step back that will occur on most buildings- varies with site, 80% is most common. 3. Number of floors to maximum eve height - varies with scenario 4. Usable Floor Area in Roof. This value is set at 56%, which is the average net captured roof space on a double loaded building with a 9/12 pitched roof. 5. Retail common space- 15% 3 _ 6. DU/FFU common space 22% 7. AU common space- 40% 8. Dwelling unit average size- 1600 S.F. 9. Average number of bedrooms per D.U.- 2 10. Average pillows per D.U. bedroom- 2 11. Fractional fee unit average size- 1600 S.F. 12. Average number of bedrooms per F.F.U.- 2 13. Average pillows per F.F.U. bedroom- 2 14. Accommodation unit average size- 375 S.F. 15. Average pillows per A.U.- 2 16. Retail - percent gross area of ground floor- varies with site 17. Residential- percent gross area of ground floor- varies with site 18. Living Space (DU, FFU, AU) - percent area of second floor- 100% 19. Percentage of total living space in dwelling unit's- varies with scenario and site 20. Percentage of total living space in fractional fee unit's- varies with scenario and site 21. Percentage of total living space in accommodation unit's- varies with scenario and site 22. Retail employee generation- # employee's per 1000 S.F. 23. Average employee's generated per DU 24. Average employee's generated per FFU 25. Average employee's generated per AU 26. Multiple job employee reduction factor- 75% (based on an average employee holding 1.35 jobs) 27. Total annual skier days- 150 28. Average annual skier days per DU- 101 29. Average annual skier days per FFU- 253 30. Average annual skier days per AU- 138 31. DU annualized occupancy rate- 30% 32. FFU annualized occupancy rate- 75% 33. AU annuaIized occupancy rate- 65% . 4 - LIONSHEAD MASTER PLAN PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT DATA MODEL Individual Scenario Summa Tables 5 I une 4, 1998 Model Results _ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- q All Projected Development Y lx „ ~ h _ Scenarios ~ 6 •c D o v = v ~ 3 N 7 ? ~ LT •R C y aL 0 7 S. ~ C C O C C Ci 7 u y CL' L f/~ C O E C v' Q O C Y ~ •Y ~ . ~ 6~ tA d a u a o a 9 a~ ~ a d ~ Gz a L G a ri a < a° a< c+ ~ m a, E°D Y °Q eQa 0Q o ae ae aa ea ? aro Ev ~ ` ~ a+ ^ o d = o a ` o o ` o o ` o ~ `o ~ Li. Scenario A-1: Four story building, weighted towards fractional fee units Grand Total, Scenario A-1 603,472 1,1]8,175 136,621 73 87 338 1,013 123 189 1,223 105,946 14 7S0 Scenario A-2: Four story building, wei hted towards dwelling units Grand Total, Scenario A-2 603,472 1,118,175 136,621 394 473 17 50 123 189 645 57,174 31 150• Scenario B-1: Five story building, weighted towards fractional fee units Grand Total, Scenario B-1 603,472 1,319,190 136,621 86 103 411 1,233 158 242 1,494 129,536 16 791 Scenario B-2: Five storv building, weighted towards dwelling units Grand Total, Scenario B-2 603,472 1,319,190 136,621 14761571121 64 158 242 792 70,333 37 791 Scenario C-1: Six story building, weighted towards fractional fee units Grand Total, Scenario C-1 603,472 1,520,205 136,621 99 119 484 1,453 192 296 1,765 153,126 19 833 Scenario C-2: Six story building, weighted towards dwelling units Grand Tota1, Scenario G2 6031472 1,520,205 136,621 155816691261 78 192 296 939 83,493 43 833 Net Gain of Retail Square Footage- All scenarios 92,806 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units- 4 stories 341 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units- 5 stories 428 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units- 6 stories 515 une 4, 1998 Model Results Results: Scenario A-1. Four ~ story bui{ding, weighted 4J 0 towards Fractional Fee product : W ~ v ~ V _ - 'II °O C y ~ ~ C 'O C~ ~'fl U, u d C' on new development v. ~ ~ C Y ~ •Y Y 0 Y 61 IR O C V m '~a u c ~ a o c~, na ~ = 9 ~ cv Gti d 3 u 'o - ~ c.~. d ~ vi ° oC ~ C a cu a ` < a~ 40 C C a C Q W V aQ ~ EO CQ 06 a¢ 06 W O CO E'C ° i W y o 0 o ro `v o _ `o v = o a o°o o ` New Development _ 1 North Day Lot 59,449 57,103 3,537 0 0 26 77 0 0 77 6.533 0 23 , 2 West Day Lot 114,775 206,154 11,018 0 0 90 271 0. 0 271 22.826 0 73 3,VA Service Yard 115,778 207,956 27,787 0 0 81 244 0 Q 244 20,553 0 141 4 Face of Parking Structure 10,690 34,282 7,697 0 0 12 35 0 0 35 2,926 0 36 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-of1' 5,623 15,150 4,049 0 0 5 14 0 0 14 1,197 0 18 Subtotals 306,315 520,644 54,088 0 0 213 640 0 0 640 54,036 0 291 Redevelopment of existing properties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 21,955 5,867 0 0 7 21 0 0 21 1,735 0 27 8 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 181,582 50,633 11 13 17 50 123 189 186 18,428 5 274 9 Landmark Townhomes 30,000 65,482 - 0 0 31 92 0 0 92 7,770 0 9 10 Lazier Arcade 14,316 33,396 9,735 0 0 10 30 0 0 30 2,519 0 44 11 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 90,612 - 0 0 42 127 0 0 127 10,751 0 13 12 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 47,187 7,566 0 0 18 53 0 0 53 4,477 0 37 Subtotals 217,001 440,214 73,801 11 13 124 373 123 189 509 45,679 2 404 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 13,000 35,025 - 16 20 0 0 0 0 20 1,662 55 5 1s Lifthouse Lodge 15,905 32,081 - 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 805 22 2 16 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 39,123 79,296 - 37 45 0 0 0 0 45 3,763 41 11 Subtotals 68,028 146,402 - 62 74 0 0 0 0 74 6.231 39 19 Ground Level Retail Expansion 18 Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 3,312 2,650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 19 Lazier Arcade 8,448 7,603 6,083 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Subtotals 12,128 10,915 8,732 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Grand Total, Sceaario A-1 603,472 1,118,175 136,621 73 87 338 1,013 123 189 1,223 105,946 14 750 For• net gain of retail square footage, subtract out the existing retail to be repiaced: VA Core Site 27,483 Concert Hall Plaza 5,802 Lazier Arcade 7,330 Lionspride building 3,200 43,815 Net Gain ofRetail Square Footage 92,806 For net gain of dwelling and fraction fee units, subtract out the existing DU's to be replaced Lazier Arcade 14 Landmark Townhomes 28 Lionsquare North Phase 4 27 69 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units 341 une 4, 1998 Mndel Results Results: Scenario A-2. Four ; story building, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product ~ ~ Q Y~ o c c c c ~ ~ on new development e LT. E o ~ a C; ~ ~ E Y ~ Y Y !0 < p C V ~ m o ea C:: a' E m i v~ = oC bn G a 6i a Q aE a< i .0 aa a, •h , ~ a u a`Q m as a aa w a o m E CO r• O p Y C C C ~ ~ o d a+ ~ a. _ o a, e o o ` ` o 0 0 ~ `o ` New DeveloRment North Day Lot 59,449 57,103 3,537 26 31 0 0 0 0 31 2,613 19 2; West Day Lot 114,775 206,154 11,018 90 108 0 0 0 0 108 9,131 34 73 . VA Service Yard 115,778 207,956 27,787 81 97 0 0 0 0 97 8.221 31 141 Face of Parking Structure 10,690 34,282 7,697 12 14 0 0' 0 0 14 .1,170 47 36 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 15,150 4,049 5 6 0 0 0 0 6 479 37 1$ Subtotals 306,315 520,644 54,088 213 256 0 0 0 0 256 21,614 30 291 Redevelopment of existing properties Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 21,955 5,867 7 8 0 0 0 0 8 694 26 27 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 181,582 50,633 11 13 17 50 123 189 186 18,428 5 274 Landmark Townhomes 30,000 65,482 - 31 37 0 0 0 0 37 3,108 45 9 Lazier Arcade 14,316 33,396 9,735 10 12 0 0 0 0 12 1,007 30 44 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 90,612 - 42 51 0 0 0 0 51 4,301 45 13 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 47,187 7,566 18 21 0 0 0 0 21 1,791 34 37 Subtotals 217,001 440,214 73,801 119 142 17 50 123 189 315 29,329 24 404 Additional Densitv Added.. Antlers (1972) 13,000 35,025 - 16 20 0 0 0 0 20 1,662 55 5 Lifthouse Lodge 15,905 32,081 - 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 805 22 2 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 39.123 79,296 - 37 45 0 0 0 0 45 3,763 41 ll Subtotals 689028 146,402 - 62 74 0 0 0 0 74 69231 39 19 Ground Level Retail Expansion Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 3.312 2,650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Lazier Arcade 8,448 7,603 6,083 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Subtotals 12,128 10,915 8,732 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Grand Total, Scenario A-2 603,472 1,118,175 136,621 1394147311715011231 189 645 57,174 31 75011 For net gain of retail square footage, subtract out the existing retail to be replaced: VA Core Site 27,483 Concert Hall Plaza 5,802 Lazier Arcade 7,330 L;ionspride building 3,200 43,815 Net Gain of Retail Square Footage 92,806 For net gain of dwelling and fraction fee units, subtract out the existing DU's to be replaced Lazier Arcade 14 Landmark Townhomes 28 Lionsquare North Phase 4 27 69 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units 341 I une 4, 1998 Model Resutts Results: Scenario B-1. Five w story building, weighted ~ 'e ; towards Fractional Fee product W6 LX. ae d d on new development 0 U•~ ~ C ~ w Y E ~ O - Y W L p C m ~ •y Cw G O d W G a . C oc y Gp (i Y V a V O ~ C £ d ~ a a t/~ Y LY ~ G 0. Gr, 0. Q 6. 6. Q Y az. 0 aa.. O C6 CQ C6 CI ~ !6 V ~ ~ 0 ~ C •C t9 C ~ O p, O p O O O O O O H O L L O w Y C O 4+ F. F. 6. ^ L • New DeveloRment North Day Lot 59,449 67,299 3,537 0 0 31 92 0 0 92 7,791 0 24 West Day Lot 114,775 244,719 11,018 0 0 108 325 0 0 325 27,402 0 79 VA Service Yard 115,778 246,857 27,787 0 0 99 298 0 0 298 25,169 0146 , Face of Parking Structure 10,690 • 41,209 7,697 0 0 15 44 0 0 44 3,748 0 37 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5.623 17,984 4,049 0 0 6 18 0 0 18 - 1,533 0 19 Subtotals 306,315 618,067 54,088 0 0 259 778 0 0 778 65,644 0 305 Redevelopment of existing properties Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 26,062 5,867 0 0 9 26 0 0 26 2,222 0 27 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 214,810 50,633 14 17 21 64 158 242 239 23,605 6 292 Landmark Townhomes 30,000 77,977 - 0 0 37 110 0 0 110 9,252 0 11 Lazier Arcade 14,316 39,358 9,735 0 0 13 38 0 0 38 3,226 0 45 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 107,902 - 0 0 51 152 0 0 152 12,803 0 15 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 56,014 7,566 0 0 22 65 0 0 65 5,524 0 3$ Subtotals 217,001 522,124 73,801 14 17 152 455 158 242 630 569632 3 428 Additional Densitv Added.. Antlers (1972) 13,000 41,577 - 19 23 0 0 0 0 23 1,973 65 6 Lifthouse Lodge 15,905 32,081 - 8 10 0 0 0 0 ] 0 805 22 2 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 39,123 94,426 - 44 53 0 0 0 0 53 4,482 49 13 Subtotals 68,028 168,085 - 72 86 0 0 0 0 86 7,260 46 22 Ground Level Retail Expansion Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 3,312 2,650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Lazier Arcade 8,448 7.603 6,083 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Subtotals 12,128 10,915 8,732 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Grand Total, Scenario B-1 6039472 1,319,190 136,621 86 103 411 1,233 158 242 19494 129,536 16 791 For net gain of retail square footage, subtract out the existing retail to be replaced: VA Core Site 27,483 Concert Hall Plaza 5,802 Lazier Arcade 7330 Lionspride building 3,200 43,815 Net Gain of Retail Square Footage 92,806 For net gain of dweliing and fraction fee units, subtract out the existing DU's to be replaced Lazier Arcade 14 Landmark Townhomes 28 Lionsquaze 11orth Phase 4 27 69 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units 428 une 4, 1998 Mode! Results . Results: Scenario B-2. Five : ~ • f/i story buildiag, weighted ' ~ r'c towards Dwelling Unit product = i ~ v~ o ° Y• _ e! Q u ' .C p C a on new development ~ c o C C L~v ~ U'' ~ C Y C Y 61 ~ Y y LQ p C ` ~ ~ ~ rX po G a c~ a Q a° a< ~ < m ;sEj ~ Q a~ a o ie m a et aa a? a Eo e e e - o a ` o ~ o 0 o F ~ u o i ~ o w a^+ ~ `c d New Development North Day Lot 59,449 67,299 3,537 31 37 0 0 0 0 37 3.116 23 24 West Day Lot 114,775 244,719 11,018 108 130 0 0 0 0 130 10,961 41 ' 79 . VA Service Yard 115,778 246,857 27,787 99 119 0 0 0 0 119 10,068 37 146 Face of Parking Structure 10,690 41,209 7,697 15 18 0 0 0 0 18 1,499 60" 37 " Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 17,984 4,049 6 7 0 0 0 0 7 613 47 19 Subtotals 306,315 618,067 54,088 259 311 0 0 0 0 311 26,257 37 305 Redevelopment of existing properties Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 26,062 5,867 9 11 0 0 0 0 11 889 34 27 Vaii Associates Core Site 97,371 214,810 50,633 14 17 21 64 158 242 239 23,605 6 292 Landmark Townhomes 30,000 77,977 - 37 44 0 0 0 0 44 3.701 53 11 LazierArcade 14,316 39,358 9,735 13 15 0 0 0 0 15 1,290 39 45 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 107,902 - 51 . 61 0 0 0 0 61 5,121 53 15 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 56,014 7,566 22 26 0 0 0 0 26 2,210 42 38 Subrorals 227,001 522,124 73,801 145 174 21 64 158 242 395 36,816 29 428 Additional Densitv Added.. Antlers (1972) 13,000 41,577 - 19 23 0 0 0 0 23 1,973 65 6 Lifthouse Lodge 15,905 32,081 - 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 805 22 2 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 39,123 94,426 - 44 53 0 0 0 0 53 4,482 49 13 Subtotals 68,028 168,085 - 72 86 0 0 0 0 86 7,260 46 22 Ground Level Retail Expansion Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 3.312 2,650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Lazier Arcade 8,448 7,603 6.083 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Subtotals 12,128 10,915 8,732 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Grand Total, Scenario B-2 603,472 1,319,190 136,621 1476157112116411581 242 792 70,333 37 791 For net gain of retail square footage, subtract out the existing retail to be replaced: VA Core Site 27,483 Concert Hall Plaza 5.802 Lazier Arcade 7,330 Lionspride building 3.200 43,815 Net Gain of Retail Square Footage 92,806 For net gain of dwelling and fraction fee units, subtract out the existing DU's to be replaced Lazier Arcade 14 Landmark Townhomes 28 Lionsquare North Phase 4 27 69 Net Gain of Dwelling artd Fractional Fee Units 428 ~ une 4, 1998 Mode! Results , Results: Scenario C-1. Six story ~ . ~ building, weig6ted towards Y 'e' h c Fractional Fee product on new x ~ ~ rz, d d - ' H C 7 ~ fi ~R Y a Y L v: 3 development V~ V.' C O O 'n Q T G ~ . .2 E u ~ u ev p . a o c¢ a~ ~ 9 a`+ ce 41 A. ~ r~ii ° o a cz a Q aE a Q~ Q i ; c~ ~ Q a u a:% ae a m ~ aa aa o~ Eo io d : o p, o°o o o 'WI e Lo i o Y `c d New Development North Day Lot 59,449 77,494 3,537 0 0 36 107 0 0 107 9,049 0 26 West Day Lot 114,775 283,283 11,018 0 0 126 379 0 0 379 31,978 0 84 VA Service Yard 115,778 285,759 27,787 0 0 118 353 0 0 353 29,785 0 152 , Face of Parking Structure 10,690 48,136 7,697 0 0 18 54 0 0 54 4,570 0 38 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 20.818 4,049 0 0 7 22 0 0 22 1,870 0 19 Subtotals 306,315 715,489 54,088 0 0 305 916 0 0 916 77,251 0 319 Redevelopment of existing properties Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 30,169 5,867 0 0 11 32 0 0 32 2,709 0 28 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 248,038 50,633 17 21 26 78 192 296 291 28,781 8 309 Landmark Townhomes 30,000 90,472 - 0 0 42 127 0 0 127 10,735 0 13 Lazier Arcade 14,316 45,321 9,735 0 0 16 47 0 0 47 3,934 0 45 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 125,192 - 0 0 59 176 0 0 176 14,854 0 18 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 64,841 7,566 0 0 26 78 0 0 78 6,571 0 40 Subtotals 217,001 604,033 73,801 17 21 179 538 192 296 751 67,585 3 452 Additional Densitv Added.. Antlers (1972) 13,000 48,129 - 23 27 0 0 0 0 27 2.284 76 7 Lifthouse Lodge 15,905 32,081 - 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 805 22 2 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 39,123 109,557 - 51 62 0 0 0 0 62 5,200 57 16 Subtotals 68,028 189,767 - 82 98 0 0 0 0 98 8.289 52 25 Ground Level Retail Expansion Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 3,312 2,650 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 ll Lazier Arcade 8,448 7,603 6,083 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Subtotals 12,128 10,915 8,732 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Grand Total, Scenario C-1 603,472 1,520,205 136,621 99 119 484 1,453 192 296 1,765 153,126 19 833 11 For net gain of retail square footage, subtract out the existing retail to be replaced: VA Core Site 27,483 Concert Hall Plaza 5,802 Lazier Arcade 7,330 Lionspride building 3,200 43,815 Net Gain of Retail Square Footage 92,806 For net gain of dwelling and fraction fee units, sabtract out the existing DU's to be replaced Lazier Arcade 14 Landmark Townhomes Zg Lionsquare North Phase 4 27 69 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units 515 1 une 4, 1998 tYlodel Results _ Results: Scenario C-2. Six ~ story building, weighted ~ % ~ ~ _ ~ towards Dwelling Unit product C ° ~ on new development o 9 ~ ~ Q c e o e c v;o v~,~ ~ x L' Y p Y y, ~ O C L fR ~ m e0 •Y 6 u 6 O G•ep 6~. _.9 w Gp Q v~ c a~ G c cT. a Q a~ a Q 2 c ~ 00 ~ l0 ~ Ct fA 00 W OQ CO V fA O 0 C6 C C ~ ~ C F°, c°. ~ c°• ` u a, 'e ~ d New Develo ment North Day Lot 59,449 77,494 3,537 36 43 0 0 0 0 43 3.620 26 26 West Day Lot 114,775 283,283 11,018 126 152 0 0 0 0 152 12,791 48 84 VA Service Yard 115,778 285,759 27,787 118 141 0 0 0 0 141 11,914 44 152 Face of Parking Structure 10,690 48,136 7,697 18 22 0 0 0 0 22 . 1,828 74" 38 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 20,818 4,049 7 9 0 0 0 0 9 74857 19 Subtotals 306,315 715,489 54,088 305 366 0 0 0 0 366 30,901 43 319 Redevelopment of existing properties Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 30,169 5,867 11 13 0 0 0 0 13 1,084 41 28 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 248,038 50,633 17 21 26 78 192 296 291 28,781 8 309 Landmark Townhomes 30,000 90,472 - 42 51 0 0 0 0 51 4,294 62 13 Lazier Arcade 14,316 45,321 9,735 16 19 0 0 0 0 19 1,573 47 45 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 125,192 - 59 70 0 0 0 0 70 5,942 62 18 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 64,841 7,566 26 31 0 0 0 0 31 2.629 50 40 Subtotals 217,001 604,033 73,801 171 205 26 78 192 296 475 44,303 34 452 Additional Density Added.. Antlers (1972) 13,000 48,129 - 23 27 0 0 0 0 27 2,284 76 7 Lifthouse Lodge 15,905 32,081 - 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 805 22 2 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 39,123 1.09,557 - 51 62 0 0 0 0 62 5.200 57 16 Subtotals 68,028 189,767 - 82 98 0 0 0 0 98 8,289 52 25 Ground Level Retail Expansion Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 3,312 2,650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Lazier Arcade 8,448 7,603 6,083 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Subtotals 12,128 10,915 8,732 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Grand Total, Scenario G2 603,472 1,520,205 136,621 1558166912617811921 296 939 83,493 43 83311 For net gain of retail square footage, subtract out the existing retail to be replaced: VA Core Site 27.483 Concert Hall Plaza 5,802 Lazier Arcade 7,330 Liunspride building 3,200 43,815 Net Gain of Retail Square Footage 929806 For net gain of dwelling and fraction fee units, subtract out the existing DU's to be replaced Lazier Arcade 14 Landmark Townhomes 28 Lionsquare North Phase 4 27 69 Net Gain of Dwelling and Fractional Fee Units 515 ~ J . LIONSHEAD MASTER PLAN PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT DATA MODEL Comparative Scenario Graphe. 6 550 DU & FFLJ Units Total 500 DU & FFU Units Total 3 450 DU & FFU Units Total 6 Stories 5 Stories . " 400 DU 8t FFU Units Total 350 DU & FFLJ Units Total 4 Stories 300 DU & FFU Units Total 250 DU & FFU Units Total 200 DU & FFU Units Total ; 150 DU & FFU Units Total 100 DU & FFU Units Total 50 IIU & FFCT Units Total ; .:q: 4 STORY BUILDING- 341 5 STORY BUII.,DING- 428 6 STORY BUII.,DING- 515 NOTE: The quantities shown above represent the NET GAIN of DLI's and FFU's given the assumed redevelopment scenarios - WELLII'rIG AND FRACTIONAL FEE UNITS GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES FIGURE A 200 Accomodation Units - 6 Stories 175 Accomodation Units 150 Accomodation Units 5 Stories _ ~ 125 Accomodation Units = 4 Stories - 100 Accomodation Units 75 Accomodation Units 50 Accomodation Units 25 Accomodation Units 4 STORY BUII,DING- 123 5 STORY BUILDING-158 6 STORY BUII.DING- 192 NOT'E: Due to the extreme difficulty and unlikely nature of any small incremental AU's being added to redeveloped properties, the model has utilized the Vail Associates core site only in projecting new accomdation units. Important note: Even though the four story scenario shows a net gain of 123 accomodation units, it is possible that this number of units would not be economically feasible to create in a redevelopment situation- potentially equaling zero accomodation units. ACCOIVIODATION UNITS GENERATED BY NEW A.ND REDEVELOPED PRUPERTIES FT('TTRF R 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 4 Stories ; 5 Stories 6 Stories 75,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 25,000 Sq. Ft. Retail U , , • : K a ~~f , ~,~'~~;~a . i.n, dr.~, y!'f~+r~,,~~.,:-.7, z ~vN~~~ • r~,~A,~.,~~"tt~j{~~~L'~. ,~.'~aA ,~.`r~ . . . . . . • ' 'xat~' ~ 5~ ~`P,~ , ~ ~ . a> s ~ . . i a kNa;y ra<:,: H w 4 STORY BLT[LDING- 92,806 s.f. 5 STORY BUII,DING- 92,806 s.f. 6 STORY BIJII,DING- 92,806 s.f. NOTE: Net gain of tetail space is consistent actoss all scenatios, as We first floor covetage dces not change &om scenario to scenario . PEOPLE GENERATED BY NEW ~ AND REDEVEL4PED PROPERTIES ~ SO DU/Acre . 40 DU/Acre 6 Stories > ~ 5 Stories . 30 DU/Acre " 4 Stories ~ 20 DU/Acre , 6 . ~ . ~ S 10 DU/Acre ' 4 Stories 4 ~ , af 4 . ~l.} " ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~y' ~1`~Sf rtt 7 r.' + ~ ,yM_I . WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE LTNIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING LJNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUILDING- 14 DU/ Acre 4 STORY BLTII.DING- 31 DU/ Acre 5 STORY BUII,DING- 16 DU/ Acre 5 STORY BUII.DIIVG- 37/ DU Acre 6 STORY BUII,DING- 19 DU/ Acre 6 STORY BUII.,DING- 43 DU/ Acre NOTE: The above density figures ONLY count dwelling units towards densityl The actual total unit count (FFU plus DU) is the same for boW scenarios AVERAGE DWELLING UNITS (DENSITY) PER ACR.E ON NE W AND REDEVELO" ;D PROPERTIES . , 2000 "People" Generated 1750 "People" Generated 6 Stories 1500 "People" Generated 5 Stories 1250 "People" Generated 4 Stories 1000 "People" Generated 6 Stories 750 "People" Generated 5 Stories 4 Stories 500 "People" Generated W ~ 250 "People" Generated ~ ~ w , e', . . . - 7 . , - , 2 q~ . . , t WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE IJIVIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING L7NIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUILDING- 1,223 4 STORY BUILDING- 645 5 STORY BUILDING- 1,494 5 STORY BUILDING- 792 6 STORY BUILDING- 1,765 6 STORY BUII,DING- 939 - NOTE: "People" refers to the amount of people staying in accomdaiion units, dwelling units, and fractlonal fee units at any given point in time. These figures have been adjusted to reflect the average occupancy percentages of these unit types. PEOPLE GENERATED BY NEW - AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES 175,000 Skier Days 150,000 Skier Days 6 Stories 125,000 Skier Days S Stories 100,000 Skier Days 4 Stories Stories 75,000 Sicier Days 4Storie 50,000 Skier Days 4 Stories w 25,000 Skier Days ~ ~ w 4aM~1!: ~'R, ~v~, k !pjf 1 f-•r ;n* .,tlMF 4t k G4 i'~tl'F/ ~F 1.-~ WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE LTNIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING iJNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUILDING- 105,946 4 STORY BUILDING- 57,174 5 STORY BUII.DING- 129,536 5 STORY BUILDING- 70,333 6 STORY BUII,DING- 153,126 6 STORY BUILDING- 83,493 ANNUAL SKIER DAYS GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVELOP"D PROPERTIES 800 Employee's Generated .6 Stories 6 Stories 5 Stories 5 Stories 4 Stories 4 Stories 700 Employee's Generated 600 Employee's Generated 500 Employee's Generated 400 Employee's Generated 300 Emptoyee's Generated 200 Employee's Generated ~ W ~ 100 Employee's Generated C~ ~ w , ir.., >.a•-~'~~n $.):;'wAyt;~ i - ,,.r t s S< r'•+'(~r . - WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE UNIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING LTNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUII.DING- 750 4 STORY BUILDING- 750 5 STORY BUII,DING- 791 5 STORY BUILDING- 791 6 5TORY BUII.,DING- 833 6 STORY BUQ.,DING- 833 NOTE: While the employee generation figures are the same for each scenario, the occupancy rate difference between DU's and FF[J's should be considered when assessing actuai, rtal-world employee geaeration counts EMPLOYEES GENERA.TED BY NEW AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES LIONSHEAD MASTER PLAN PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT DATA MODEL Complete Scenario Data Tables ~ SCENARIO A-1 Four stories, weighted towards fYactional fee unit development 8 Scenario A-1. Four story , building, weighted towards ~ Fractional Fee product on new development d ~ Y y CC a m .i Y c w ~ Y O L Y L V d v N a ° ° • dU 9 ~ L4 ea u ~ ` ~ `o C 0° U E c~; ~ ec u ~ = o o . ~j u ~ e `y ~ C = ? E - _ - i o a ° C e 01 ° ° = a m in ° e e a - - ~ _ a ~ t ~ y u Building Name (a.k.a.) ~ m .4 2 Z ~ C C 6 New Develoament t NorthDayLot 59,449 70% 41,614 35% 20,807 70% 11,565 4 56% 8,156 30% 15% 401% 221/4 2West Day Lot 114,775 70 / 80,343 60 % 68,865 80 % 55,092 4 56 % 30,852 30 % 20 % JO % 25 % 3 VA Service Yard 115,778 70% 81,045 60% 69,467 80% 55,573 4 56% 31,121 30% 20% 40/ 25'%. q Face of Parking Structure 10,690 70 % 7,483 90 % 9,621 90 % 8,659 4 56 % 4,849 20 % 20 % JO%. 25 % S InfillatEastBusDrop-off 5,623 70% 3,936 90% 5,061 80% 4,049 4 56% 2.267 30% 20% 40% 25% Subtotals 306,315 214,421 173,821 Redeveloament of existing proaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 701Y. 7,898 65% 7.334 sor 5.867 a 56% 3,286 soi zoi, 40i, zs%, 8 Vail AssoCiateS COre Site 97,371 701% 68,160 651% 63,291 75'% 47,468 4 561% 26,582 30% 20'% 40'/ 25'%, 9 LandmarkTownhomes 30,000 70% 21,000 70% 21,000 95% 17.850 4 56% 9,996 30% 20% 40%, 25'% lo Lazier Arcade 14,316 70 / 10,021 85 / 12,169 70'/ 8,518 4 56% 4,770 30 / 20 / 40'% '.5'G, i 1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 70 % 29,059 70'% 29,059 85 % 24.700 4 56 % 13,832 30 % 20 % JO % 25 % 12Lionsprideandparkingstructure 22,518 70% 15,763 70% 15,763 80! 12,610 a 56% 7,062 30/ 20U 40/ 25%, Subtotals 217,001 151,901 148,615 Additional Densitv Added.. 1; Antlers(1972) 13,000 70% 9,100 90% 11,700 80'% 9,360 4 561/., 5,242 30% 20% 30'% 25%15 LifthouseLodge 15,905 701%. 11,134 95% 15,110 901Y. 13,599 2 56% 7,615 20% 20% 40% 25% 16 b[arriottMountainResort(1979) 39,123 701% 27,386 65% 25,430 85% 21.615 4 561%. 12,105 30% 20'% JO% 25% Subtotals 68,028 47,620 52,240 Ground Level Retail Exoansion 18 Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 70 % 2,576 90 3,312 0/ o t o/. o o%. 20 ao / 25 / 19 LazierArcade 8,448 70U 5,914 90/ 7,603 0% 0 1 01Y. 0 0% 20/ 4 0% 25/ Subtotals 12,128 8,490 10,915 Grand Total Potential Sceuarios 603,472 422,430 385,591 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 12,866 70/ 9,006 701/ 9,006 85/ 7,655 J 56% 4,287 30% 201Y. 40/ 25/ 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 40,367 70 % 28,257 63 % 26,239 85 % 22J03 4 56%. 12,490 30% 20% JO%. 25'%, Za LandmarkTower 3$,122 70% 24S85 SO% 17;561 85% 14,927 J 56'% 8,359 30% 20% JO% 25% 25 Vail 21 15.532 70 % 10.872 70% 10,872 851% 9,242 4 56 / 5,175 30 % 20'% 40 / 25 % 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 78,416 70% 54,891 70% 54,891 85% 46,658 4 56% 26,128 30% 20% 40% 25% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 40,206 70i 28,144 70i. 28,144 ssi 23,923 r 56/ 13J97 30i 20/ aoi zs/ 28 LodgeatLionsheadPhase1 &2(1970) 59,629 701i 41,740 6o1i 35,777 as% 30,411 4 56/ 17.030 30i zoi aoi. zsi 29 LodgeatLionsheadPhase3(1976) 42,785 70% 29,949 60% 25,671 85'% 21,820 4 56% 12,219 30% 20% 40% 25% 30 Nlontaneros(1972) 44,848 70% 31,394 70% 31.394 85% 26,685 4 56% 14.943 30% 20% 40% 25% 31 Treetops(1972) 38,690 70i 27,093 eor 23,214 asr 19,732 4 56% 11,050 soi zor aoi zsr 32 Vaillnternational(1975) 78,408 701%. 54,686 701%. 54,886 85'% 46,653 4 56% 26,126 301% 20% 40'% 25% 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 152,460 70% 106,722 60'% 91,476 851%. 77,755 4 56% 43.543 30% 20% 40% 25% 34 N'ailglo Lodge 27,977 70 % 19,584 70 % 19,581 85% 16,646 4 56'% 9,322 30 % 20 % 40'% 25 % 35 Vantage Point (1972) 68,520 70'% 47,964 60'% 41,112 85% 34,945 4 561% 19,569 30% 20% 40% 25" 36Westwind(1969) 36,988 70i 25,892 70/ 25,992 851% 22,00e a 56% 12,324 sor 20r 40r zs.. Subtotals 772, 14 540,970 95,718 GranB Totals 17286 96 3 400 881,309 - Scenario A-l. Four story _ building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development d a ~ .C 7 h d LQ .i 4 M ~ V m N v ~ • v' eC u > : a ; < ao > ~ ~ w < C Q Q q {i' t E j e E E E J E o E L': - ~ " 'c _ C m 4 0 ~ C ~ c y O Y G OL ~ b ~ C ~ d ~ C 4 a . E Building Name (a.k.a.) ' Z d e ~ z C6 _ < New Develonment I NOrth Day LOt 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 i 375 2 2Wcst Day Lot 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 3N'A Service Yard 1.60u 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 :.o r 375 2 4 Facc of Parking Structure 1.600 1.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z 5[nfill at East [3us Drop-off 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 Z Subtotals Redevelonment of existinQ proaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 8Vail Associates Core Site 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 9 Landmark Townhomes 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 10 Lazier Arcade 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Lion Square Nrth Phsse 4(1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 12 Lionspride and parking structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 175 2 Subtotals Additional Densitv Added.. Iq Antlers (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 15 Lifthouse Lodge 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 16 Alarriott Mountain Resort (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Ground Level Retail Expansion I8 Town of Vail Park Parcel 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 19 Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 d 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Grand Totat, Potential Scenarios [lnlikelv Redevelonment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 23 Lionshead Inn (LOStello) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 24 LandmarkTower 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 25 Va1121 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 25 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 zs Lodte at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 • 1.0 a 375 z zv LodQe at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) l,fioo 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 3 375 2 30 tMontancros (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 i 375 2 31 Treetops (1972) 1.60M0 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 . 32 \'ail International (1975) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 1.600 :.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 » 375 2 31 Vailglo Lodgc 1.600 2.0 2.0 a 1.600 2.0 :.o 4 375 z 35 Venlagc Point (1972) 1.600 :.0 2.0 4 I.600 2.0 2.11 1 375 2 36 Weshrind (1969) 1,6011 2.0 :.0 4 I.GW 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Crand Totals Scenario A-1. Four story building, -,veighted towards ~ Frac'tional Fee product on ~ a y new development R ° L .D O O C ~ Ix w d O R ~ a y C C~] ~ C w O y O O ~ 0 C ~ EC C C 00 0 0 $ e E E M C a : - 0 R a . ~p °L m 9 a ~ ~ " ~ G ~ `o e > > i C ti < p a ' ¦ ` ~ a . . ` ` i ~ 0 0 ~ ~ C Irec m m C ~ E p`c m c c c :fl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q O y f ~ ~ ~J C q y 9 ~ C ` s a w ~ ~ ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) ~ a o V w a ~ a ~ NeN Develanment j \orth Day Lot 20% oi eoi too/. 52.942 oIi too/. oIi 57,103 i:r71 z 1N'estDayLot 20"/. 0% 80% 100% 19:381 U% 100% 0"/» 204.154 SO.SSII 3N'A Scrvice l'ard $0% 0'y" 50 % 1001%. 173r22 Oi:. IINI'%. 0'% 207.956 50,252 o FaceofParfung5tructure iooi, 01i, oi 11wi, 24.661 or.. iari. oi, 34-1e2 8,089 5 InfiliatEastBusDrop-off 1001r. oi, oi 1 uur Io,os9 or 100r, oi 15,150 3,534 Subtotals 453,295 520,644 Redevelonment of existine nronerties • 7 Cancert Hnll Plaza ioo^/. o'/ o/ ioo/ 14.621 oi nw'/ o/ 21.955 5.12: 8 VailAssociatesCore Sitc 100/ 0/ 0/ ioo'/ II8,29I 20 i, 30/. So% 181,582 51,103 9 LandmarkTownhomes oi oi tooli, ioo1i 65,482 oi ioo%. oi. 65,482 16.371 10 Lazicr Arcadc 100 % 0% 0/ 100 % 21,227 0% 100 % 0% 33,396 7,740 it Lion Square Nrth Phase 4 (1972) oi oi 100i iooi 90,612 ai 100r oi 90,e12 22,e53 lZ LionsprideandpArkingstructure 60% o"/. ao% 100/ 37,729 0% 100/ o/ 47,187 17324 Subtotals 347,963 440,214 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 0% 0% 100 % 100%, 35,025 100 / 01y" 0% 35,025 8,756 15 LifthousoLodge 0% 0% 0% 1001% 16,971 100°l,. 0% 0'% 32,081 4,243 iGDlarriottlltountainResort (1979) o/ o/ tooi too•i 79,296 iooi o/ o/ 79,296 19,824 Subtotals 131,292 146,402 Ground Level Retail Exoansion is Town of Vail ParkParcel , tooi oi oi iooIi - sai Soi o/ 3,312 662 19 LazierArcade 100% o% o°/. 1 00% - 50% 501Y. o/ 7,603 1S21 Subtotals _ 10,915 Grand 1'otal Potential Scenarios 932,550 1,118,175 Unlikeh, Redevel2nment- 2: ti:nLian Condominiums (1973) o;:, ou woi 1001/1. 28,083 100-i oIi, o1i, 28,083 7,021 23 Lionshcad Inn (Loslello) oI/, oIi tooi. 1oo1y" 81.817 ino% 01/, o'%, 81•817 20,454 24 LandmArkTors-cr 50'% 0'% SU% 100%, 45,978 100'% U'Y 0%" 54,759 13,251 25 Vai121 100% 0% 0% 100% 23.030 t00% 01%. 0% 37,902 7.932 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 01/6 o/ 100i 100i 171,162 tooi o/ oi 17I,162 42,790 27 Lionshead Center (1969) loor oi oi tooi. 59,615 100% oi, oi, 87,759 20,533 zs Lodgc at Lionshcad Phase 1& 2(1970) o% oi. iooi 1001r 111,561 100i, oi ui, 111,561 27.890 :v Lodgc at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) o/, ai, iooi iuoi, 80,047 too/ o'i, ai, 80.047 20,012 30 1101itancros (1972) 301SS, 0'% 70% I001Z, 88.473 1GUG. 01~.' lII/ 97,89: :i.00] 31 Trectops (1972) so/ o/ soi, 1oo1i, 60.779 ioo/, o^r,, 01i. 72.386 17•516 \'ail lnternational (1975) 011/- o/ loo'/ l00'/ M,144 100'% 01•111 O%, 171.144 42.786 33 N'ail Spa Condominiums.(1979) ao'/ o'i, 60% iooi, 248.6511 1001i. or, oli, 285r40 69,481 34 Vailglo I.odgc oi 01i, ioo1z, ioaz, 61.067 tooi, u•;,. n1r„ e1,067 15_1 6 3: \ant8tc Puint (1972) 0'%. 01%, 100% 1110'Sb 12sJ95 I00% u"r., u'%. 128.195 31.049 36 N1u+hrind (1961) 0% 0'%, 100% 10071. 80.735 100'%, U"r„ 0'% 80.735 ?U.ISJ Sub(otals 1,440,337 1+54i,749 Grand Totals 2,372,886 2,663,925 Scenario A-1. Four story . building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development ~ - o . z ~ d ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) ~ . New Development 1 North Day Lot 21A9% 4,161 624 3,537 52,942 - - - 52,94: 11,647 2 West Day Lot 24.67 % 13,773 2,755 11,018 192,381 - - - 192,381 48,095 3 VA Service Yard 24.16 % 34,733 6,957 27.787 173,222 - - - 173,222 43}06 a Face of Parking Structure 23,60 % 9,621 1,924 7,697 24,661 - - - 24,661 6,165 5[nfill at East Bus Drop-off 23.33 % 5,061 I,012 4,049 10,089 - - - 10,089 :,52: Subtotals 54,088 Redeveloament of existine pronerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 2333% 7,333 1,467 5,867 14,621 - - - 14,621 3.655 S VAiI Associates Core Site 28.14% 63,291 12,658 50,633 118,291 23,658 5,915 17.744 35,487 8,872 9 LandmarkTownhomes 25.00% - - - 65,482 - - - 65,982 16-371 10 Lazier Arcade 23.18 % 12,169 2,434 9,735 21,227 - - - 21,227 5307 11 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 25.00%. - - - 90,612 - - - 90,612 22.653 12 Lionspride and parking structure Zq.pp^/„ 9,458 1,892 7,566 37,729 - - - 37,729 9,432 Subtotals 73,801 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers(1972) 25,00/ 35,025 35,025,12 8,756 26,269 - - 15 Lifthouse Lodge 1333 % - - - 16,971 16,971 4,243 I2,728 - - ib blarriott Mountain Resort (1979) 25.00% - - - 79,296 79r96 19,824 59.472 - - Subtotals - Ground Level Retail Exnansion - - - - - - Is I Town of Vail Park Parcel 10.0016 3.312 662 2,650 l9 LazierArcade 20.00% 7,603 11521 6,083 • - - - - - Subtotals 8,732 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 linlikelv Redeveloament- - - zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) 25.00i - - - 28,083 28,093.13 7,021 21,062 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 25.00% - - - 91,817 81,817 20,454 61,363 - - 24 LandmarkTower 2430% 8,781 1.756 7.0:4 45,978 45,978 11,495 34,464 - - 25 VAil21 23.40% 10,872 2,174 8,698 23,030 23,0.30 5,757 17,272 - ' - - 25 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 25.00% - - - 171,162 171.16: 42,790 128,371 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 23.40/ zs,ua 5,629 22,515 59,615 59,e15 14,904 44,711 - - zS Lodge at Lianshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 25.00% - - - 111,561 111b61 27,890 83,e71 - - zv Lod;e at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 25.00% - - - 80,047 80.047 zo,mz 60,035 - - 30 Montaneros(1972) 24.52% 9,418 1,884 7,534 88,473 88.473 22.118 66,355 - - st Treetops (1972) 24.20"/. 11.607 2,321 9,286 60,779 60,779 15,195 45,584 - - - - 3: N"ail International (1975) zs.oo/ - - - 171,1+4 171.144 42,78e 128,358 ss N'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 2436 % 36,590 7,318 29,272 248,650 248,650 62,163 186,-088 - - - - 34 Vailglo Lodge 25.00i - - - 61,067 e1,067 15,267 45,800 35 4'antage Point (1972) 25.00/ - - - 128,195 128.195 32,019 96,147 - - - - 36 NVestwind (1969) 29,00/ - 60,735 80,735 20,184 60,551 Subtotals 4,330 Grand Totals 220,951 Scenario A-1. Four story building, weighted towards - Fractional Fee product on new development w ~ ~ ~ h w . > Q - ci F ~ ~ ` ~ y .'q^ F ~i Ci 2 ? ~ ti ~ ti c Z ° c ~ F o`i `v S d i ~ C~ t. t~ V F F Building Name (a.k.a.) w e Q Q ~ 2 z 2 New Develoament t North Day Lot 41,295 - - - 57,103 - - 25•$1 103 " - zWest Day Lot 144,286 - - - 206,I54 - - 90 361 - - 3 VA Service Yard 129,917 - - - 207,956 - - 81 325 - - a Face of Parking Structure I8,495 - - - 34,282 - - 12 46 - - 5[nfill at East Bus Drop-off 7,567 - - - 15,150 - - 5 Iv - - Subtotals - - - 213 854 - - Redeveloament of existin¢ aroperties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 10,966 - - - 21,955 - - 7 27 8 Vail Associates Core Site 26,616 59,146 23,658 35,487 181,582 11 ii 17 67 95 189 v LandmarkTownhomes 49,112 - - - 65,482 - - 31 123 - - to Lazier Arcade 15.920 - - - 33,396 - - 10 ao - - i t Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 67,959 - - - 90,612 - - az 170 - - 12 Lionspride and parking structure 28,297 - - - 47.187 - - 18 71 ~ - Subtotals 59,146 11 44 124 497 95 189 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) - - - - 35,025 16 66 - - - - 15 Lifthouse Lodge - - - - 16,971 8 32 16 Nlarriott Mountain Resort (1979) - - - - 79,296 37 149 - - ' ' Subtotals - 62 246 - - - - Ground Level Retail Expansion ts Town of Vail Park Parcel - - - - 3.312 - - - " ' ~ .9 LazierArcade - - - ' 7•60.3 Subtotals - ' ' " - Grand Total, Potenfial Scenarios 59,146 73 291 338 1,351 95 189 Linlikelv Redevelonment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) - - - - 28,083 Is ss - - - - 23 Lianshead lnn (LOSte110) - - - - 81,817 38 153 - - - ~ 24 LandmarkTower - - - - 54,759 22 86 25 Vail21 - - - - 33.902 11 43 - - - - - - - - 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - - - - 171,162 so 321 27 Lionshead Center(1969) - - - - 87,759 28 >>Z " - ~ - - - - zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - - - - 111,561 52 209 - - - - 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - - - - 80,047 38 150 30 Montaneros (1972) - - - - 97,892 at 166 - - - ' 31 Treetops (1972) - - - - 72,386 28 >>a - - - - - - - - 32 Vail International (197$) - - - - 171,144 so 321 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) - - - - 295,240 117 466 - - ~ ' 34 Vailglo Lodge - - - - 61,067 29 tta - - - - - - - - 35 Vantage Point (1972) - - - - 128,195 60 240 36 NN'estwind (1969) - - - - 80,735 38 151 - - - - Subtotals - 75 2,701 - - - ' Grand Totals 59,146 748 2,991 338 1,351 95 189 Scenario A-1. Four story building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development ~ 0 L y 6~ [ C ~ d C~ C d ~ d ~ ~ d o ; c $ E v ' W a ~ ° e d ° ~ c a d ~ a y o ,d ~ E c ~ e01i ` ~ u ~ ~ ° ~ . x a d ! u W e E ~ ~ odi , u •y U j V ~ C~ 3 ~ ~ C . L g ' T C t` E ~ e d o e o d ccF`. ~ d U ~ E 01 E V ~E U Z Z ~ m Q = ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) a m o ~ ° ' ~ a Q Q e New Development t tiorth Day Lot 5.5 ts 0.4 - 0.4 10 0.75 - 30 0.76 23 2 Nest Day Lot 5.5 61 0.4 - 0.4 36 0.75 - 97 1 73 3N'A Service Yard s.s 153 0.4 - 0.4 32 0.75 - l85 t 141 4 Face of Parking Structure 5.5 42 0.4 - oA 5 0.75 - 47 t 36 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5.5 22 0.4 - 0.9 2 0.75 - 24 1 18 Subtotals 297 - 85 - 383 Redevelonment oP esisting properties • 7 Concert Hall Plaza 5.5 32 oA - 0.4 3 0.75 - 35 t 27 8VAil Associates Core Site 5.5 278 0.4 4 0.4 7 0.75 71 361 1 271 9 LandmarkTownhomes 5.5 - 0.4 - 0.4 12 0.75 - 12 1 9 10 Lazier Arcade 5.5 Sa oA - 0.4 4 0.75 - Sd 1 44 I t Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) Ss - 0.4 - 0.4 t'f 0.75 - » 1 13 12Lionspride and paeking structure 5.5 42 oA - 0.4 7 0J5 - 49 1 37 Subtotals 406 4 50 71 531 Additional Densitv Added.. 1 4 Antlers (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 7 0.4 - 0.75 - 7 1 5 Lifthouse Lodge 5.5 - 0.4 3 0.4 - 0.75 - 3 t z 16 Nlarriott hlountain Resort (1979) 5.5 - 0.4 IS 0.4 - 0.75 - 15 t 11 Subtotals - 25 - - 25 Ground Level Retail Expansion ts Town of Yail Park Pnrcel 5.5 15 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - 1$ 1 11 19 Lazier Arcade 5.5 33 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - 33 1 25 Subtotals 48 - - - 48 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 751 29 135 71 987 Unlikelv Redevelopment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) s.s - 0.4 5 0.4 - 0.75 - 5 1 a 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 5.5 - 0.4 15 0.4 - 0.75 - ts 1 12 24 LHndmarkTower 5.5 39 0.4 9 0.4 - 0.75 - 47 1 36 25 VAII21 5.5 JS 0.4 4 0.4 - 0.75 - SI 1 40 zb Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 5.5 - 0.4 32 0.4 - 0.75 - 32 1 24 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 5.5 124 0.4 n 0.4 - 0.75 - 135 t 103 zs Ladge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 5.5 - 0.4 21 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 1 16 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) s.s - 0.4 is 0.4 - 0.75 - 15 1 It 30 b(ontaneros (1972) 5.5 Jl 0.4 17 0.4 - 0.75 - SS I 44 31 Treetops (1972) 5.5 51 0.4 u 0.4 - 0.75 - 6= 1 47 32 N'ail International (1975) 5.5 - 0.4 32 0.4 • 0.75 - 32 t 24 33 N"ail Spa Condominiums (1979) s.s 161 0.4 47 0.4 - 0.75 - 208 i isa 34 N'Ailglo Lodge 5.5 - oA 11 o.s - 0J5 - 11 1 9 35 Vantage Point (1972) s.s - 0.4 24 oa - 0.75 - 24 1 18 36 Westwind (1969) 5.5 - 0.4 15 0.4 • 0.75 - 15 1 12 Subtotals 46 270 - - 73; Grand Totals 1,215 299 135 71 1,720 Scenario A-1. Four story building, weighted towards - Fractional Fee product on Q new development ~ CA 0 0 . ~ ~ U ~ Q L ~ d ~ V = F Q = ~ ~ s' V ~ z i o ~ C) ~ c tt a ~ w o z = e e u u y V~j Q Vyl ~ w ~ i ; ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) Q < < ~ < New Develooment 1 North Day Lot 150 IOI 0 253.13 6,533 138 0 6,533 30 % 75 % 65 % 2West Day Lot 150 IOI 0 253.13 22,826 138 0 22,826 30'/ 75'% 65 % 3 VA Service Yard 150 101 0 253.13 20,553 138 0 20,553 30 % 75'% 65 % 4 Face of P:lrking Structure 150 lOi 0 253.13 2.926 138 0 2,426 30 % 75 % 65 % 5[nfill at East Bus Drop-off 150 101 0 253.13 1.197 138 0 1,197 30% 75"/. 65% Subtotals 0 54,036 0 54,036 Redeveloament of existine oroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 150 101 0 253 1,735 138 0 1.735 30'% 75'% 65% s Vail Associates Core Site 150 101 1,123 253 4,211 138 13,095 18,428 30 % 75% 63% 9 LandmarkTownhomes Iso lot o 253 7,770 138 o 7,770 30/ 75% 65% to LazierArcade l50 101 0 253 2,519 138 0 2,519 30% 75'% 65% 11 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 150 tol 0 253 10,751 138 0 10,751 30/ 75'% 65/ 12Lionspride and parking structure 150 101 0 253 4,477 138 0 4,177 30% 75'% 65/ Subtotals 1,123 31,462 13,095 45,679 Additional Densitv Added.. 11AntlerS(1972) 150 101 1,662 253 0 138 0 1,662 30% 75% 65% 15 Lifthouse Lodge 150 101 805 253 0 138 0 SOS 30% 75'% 65% 16 Marriottblountain Resort(1979) 150 IOI 3,765 253 0 138 0 3,763 30/ 75% 65% Subtotals 6,231 0 0 6,231 Ground Level Retail Exoansion 18 Town of Vail ParkParcd 150 tot o 253 0 138 .0 0 30/ 75% 65% 19 LazierArcade 150 101 0 2530 138 0 0 30~, 75% 65% Subtotals 0 0 0 0 Grand Total Potential Scenarios 7,354 85,497 13,095 105,946 Unlikelv Redevel2pment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 150 ]Ol 1,333 253 0 138 0 1.333 30%. 75% 65% 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 150 101 3,883 253 0 138 0 3,883 30'% 75% 65% za Landmark Tower 150 101 2.182 253 0 138 0 2,182 30%. 75 % 65 % 25 Vall 21 150 101 1,093 253 0 138 0 1,093 30%. 75%. 65 % 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 150 ]Ol 5,123 253 0 138 0 8,123 30% 75'% 65% 27 LionsheadCenter(1969) iso 101 2,829 zss 0 138 o 2,829 aoi 75i bsi zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 150 101 5.295 zsa 0 138 o 5.295 30% 75r 65% 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 150 101 3,799 253 0 138 0 3,799 30 % 75 % 65% 30 Jlontaneros (1972) 150 101 4,199 253 0 138 0 4,199 301% 75% 65% 31 Treetops (1972) 150 101 2,885 253 0 138 0 2,885 30 % 75 % 65 % 32 Vail International (1975) 150 101 8,123 253 0 138 0 8,123 30%, 75% 65% 33 N'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) I50 101 11,801 253 0 138 0 11,801 30% 751y. 65"/. 34 Vailglo Lodge 150 101 2,898 253 0 138 0 2,898 30'% 75'% 64 % 35 Vantage Point (1972) 150 101 6,084 253 0 138 0 6,084 30% 75"/. 65% 36 Westwind (1969) 150 lOl 3,832 253 0 138 0 3,832 30 % 75 % 65 % Subtotals 5,360 0 0 68,360 Grand Totals 75,714 85,497 13,095 174,306 Scenario A-1. Four story . building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development L a ~ 0 r1" s Q h u k = ~ e C ~ ti ~ e Y K . o ` •e j j ~ ~ _ . d C: = j ~ 4 S a < < d a - . ~ c c ~ a ~ % ~ y i. e~i ~ Y G = C 8 Building Name (a.k.a.) = F:~ New Development I North Day Lot 3,537 - - 26 77 - - 77 6,533 23 - 2WCSt Day LOt 11,018 90 271 - - 271 22,826 73 - - 3 VA Service l'ard 27,787 81 244 - - 244 20,553 141 4 Face of Parking Structure 7,697 - - 12 35 - - 35 2,926 36 - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 4,0.49 - - 5 ta - - » 1,197 ia - Subtotals 54,088 - - 213 640 - - 640 54,036 291 Redeveloament of existine properties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 5,867 - - 7 21 - - 21 1.735 27 - 8 Vail Associates Core Site 50,633 It 13 17 50 95 123 186 18,428 274 5 9 LandmarkTownhomes _ - - 31 92 - - 92 7,770 9 - to Lazier Arcade 9,735 - - 10 30 - - 30 2,519 .ta - 1i Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) _ 42 127 - - 127 10,751 13 - 12Lionspride and parking structure 7,566 - - 18 53 - - 53 4,477 37 - Subtotals 73,801 11 13 124 373 95 123 509 45,679 404 2 Additional Densitv Added.. 1 4 Antlers (1972) - 16 20 - - - - 20 1,662 5 55 is Lifthouse Lodge _ s 10 - - - - io sos 2 zz 16 NIarriott Nlountain Resort (1979) _ 37 45 - - - - 45 3,763 u 41 Subtotals - 62 74 - - - - 74 6,231 19 39 Ground Level Retail Exnansion ls 1'own of Vail Park Parcel 2,650 - - - - - - - - 11 - .9 Lazier Arcade 6,083 - - - - - - - ZS - Subtotals 8,732 - - - - - - - - 37 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 73 87 338 1,013 95 123 1,223 105,946 750 14 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) - 13 16 - - - - 16 1,333 a as Za Lionshead Inn (Lostello) - 38 46 - - - - 46 3,893 tz 41 24 LandmarkTower 7,024 22 26 - - - - 26 2,182 36 27 25 Vai121 8,698 11 13 - - - - 13 1,093 40 30 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - so 96 - - - - 96 8,123 ia 45 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 22,515 28 34 - • - - 34 2,829 103 30 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - Sz 63 - - - - 63 5,295 16 38 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - 38 45 - - - - as 3,799 11 38 30 Nlontaneros (1972) 7,534 41 so - - - - so 4,199 44 40 31 Treetops (1972) 9,286 28 34 - - - - 34 2,885 47 32 32 N'ail International (1975) . so 96 - - - - 96 8,123 24 45 33 N'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 29,272 117 140 - - - - 140 I1.801 158 33 34 N'ailglo Lodge - zv 34 - - - - 34 2,898 9 45 35 Vantage Point (1972) - 60 72 - - - - 72 6,084 18 38 36 1Vestwind (1969) - 38 45 - - - - 45 3,832 12 JS Subtotals 4,33 675 810 - - - - 810 68,360 558 38 Grand Totals 220,951 748 897 38 1,013 95 123 2,034 174,306 1,308 34 ~ SCENARIO A-2 Four stories, weighted towaYds dwelling unit development 9 Scenario A-2. Four story . building, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development H ' Y (Q a ~ .L Y C w 6Q y p ~ aci V U q Y d 9 V] 7 C Y ~ ~ Q~ q ~ CC W Gd C ~ L V ~ ~ w O ~ '9 0 ~ p j C Lt CL VI ~ a , ~ [V Y ~ O O G Y CA W F q $ aI ° ~ C E E . t~ a eyc i ~ ~ `o a ~ ~ o y ~ a = a - c y ~`i' 61 Y O k. ` o ~ ~ ~ Q Lj w m ~ E Building Name (a.k.a.) AZ A d ~ - z New Develoament 1\orth DJy LOt 59,449 70 % 41,614 35 % 20,807 70 % 14.565 4 56 % 8,156 301% 15'% 40 % 22 % 2 W CSt Dey LOt 114,775 70 % 80,353 60 % 68,865 80 % 55,092 4 56 % 30,852 30 % 20 % 40 % 25 % 3 VAServiceY"ard 115,778 70'% 81,045 60% 69,467 80"/. 53,573 4 56%. 31,121 30% 20% 40% 25% 4 Face of Parking Structure 10,690 70% 7,483 90"/. 9,621 90% 8,659 4 56% 4,849 20'% 20% 40% 25%. 5[nfill at East Bus Drop-off $,623 70% 3,936 90% 5,061 80% 4,049 4 56% 2,267 30% 20% 40% 25'% Subtotals 306,315 214,421 173,821 Redeveloament of existina prooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 70 % 7,898 65'% 7.334 80'% 5.867 4 56 % 3,286 30 20 % 40'% 25'%• 8 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 70 % 68,160 65 % 63,291 75 % 47,468 4 56'% 26,582 30'% 20'% 40 % 25 % 9 LandmarkTownhomes 30,000 70% 21,000 70% 21,000 85"/» 17,850 4 56% 9,996 301%, 20% 40% 25'/ to LazierArcade 14,316 70% 10,021 85% 12,169 70% 8,518 4 56'% 4,770 30% 20% 40'% 25% i i Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 70r 29,059 70i 29,059 as i 24,700 r 5 6 i. 13,932 30r zo-i, ao r 25r 12 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 70% 15,763 70% I5,763 80% 12.610 4 56% 7,062 30%, 20% 40/ 25%, Subtotals 217,001 151,901 148,615 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers(1972) 13,000 70"/« 9,100 90% 11,700 80% 9,360 J 56% 5,242 30% 20% 40% 25%, l5 LifthouseLodge 15,905 70'% 11,134 95% 15,110 90'% 13,599 2 56% 7.615 20'% 20/ 40% 25% 16 iNIarriottiNtountainResort(1979) 39,123 70/ 27,386 65% 25,430 ES% 21,615 a 56% 12,105 30%, zo% ao% 25% Subtotals 68,028 47,620 52,240 Ground Levcl Retail Exnansion isTownofVailParkParcel 3,680 70'/ 2,576 90% 3,312 0l/ o t o/ o o/ 20/ ao/ 25'/ 19 Lazier Arcade $+448 70 % 5,914 90 % 7,603 0% ~0 1 0%, 0 0'% 20%. 40 % 25 i, Subtotals 12,128 8,490 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 603,472 422,430 385,591 LJnlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 12,866 70 % 9,006 70 % 9,006 85 % 7,655 J 56 / 4,287 30 20 % 40 % 25 1% 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 40,367 70% 28,257 63 % 26Z39 85 % 22,303 4 56% 12,490 30% 20'% 40 % 25'% 24 LandmarkTower 35,122 70'% 24585 50% 17,561 85% 14,927 4 56'%, "59 301% 20'% 40% 25'%. 25 Vail21 15,532 70% 10,872 70% 10,872 85'% 9,242 4 56% 5,175 30'% 20'% 40% 25/ zb Lion Square Lodgc Phases 1-3 78,416 70"/» 54,891 70 % 54,891 85 % 46,658 4 56 % 26,128 30 % 20%, 40 % 25 % 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 40,206 70 % 28,144 70 % 28,144 85 % 23,923 4 56 % 13,397 30'%, 20'% 40'% 25 za Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 59,629 70% 41,740 601i, 35,777 85-/ 30,411 a 56% 17,030 30%. zo/ oor zs%, 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 42,785 70 % 29,949 60'% 25,671 851%. 21,820 J 56 % 12519 30 % 20'% 40 % 25'%. 30 hlontaneros (1972) 44,848 70"/« 31,394 70'% 31,394 85'% 26,685 4 56'% 14.913 30'% 20%. 40'% 25'%- 31 Treetops (1972) 38,690 70 % 27,083 60'% 23,214 85 % 19,732 J 56 % 11,050 30 % 20 % 40 % 25'% 32 Vail International (1975) 78,408 70 % 54,886 70'% 54,886 SS % 46,653 4 56 % 26,126 30 % 20 % JO % 25 % 33 N'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 152,460 70 % 106.722 60 % 91,476 85 % 77,755 4 56 % 43543 30 % 20 % 40 % 25%. 34 N'ailglo Lodgc 27,977 70% 19,584 70 / 19,584 SS % 16,646 4 56 % 9,322 30%. 20 % 40% 25 35 N antage Point (1972) 68,520 70 % 47,964 60 41,112 85 % 34,945 4 56 % 19,569 30-i. 20 % 40 % 25 % 36 NN'estwind (1969) 36,988 70% 23,892 70'% 25,892 85% 22,008 4 56'% 12,324 30'% 20%. 40% 25% Subtotals 772,814 540,970 495,718 Grand Totals 1,376,286 963 400 881,309 _ Scenario A-2. Four story building, weighted towards . Dwelling Unit product on new development d a ~ e 0 q L ~ y R v •L ~ N 1 Y d N r m ~ v ~ W r N y Y Y ~ m > OL i _ ~ ~ > Y Li Y C Q p a fa. ~ L > u ~ G i c a E j o . . E E S J ~ o E G~ ~ J • d $ o L; „ ` $ ti Q ~ w ~i d ~ u w y ~ C m m y ~ m m Y 10 L = O Y C O Y L 96 " y e .0 0- CC G r Building Name (a.k.a.) ~ z Z A. Q ~ Q o ~ a New Develoament IN0rth Day LOt 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 395 2 z West Day Lot 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 3 VA Service Yard 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 4 Face of Parking Structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Redevelooment of existine orooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaze 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 a Vaii Associates Core Site 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 9 Landmark Townhomes 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 10 LazierArcade I.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 11 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 z 12 Lionspride and parking structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 z Subtotais Additional Densitv Added.. la Antlers (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 15 Lifthouse Lodge 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z 16 ylarriott btountain Resort (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 Z Subtotals Ground Levcl Retail Exoansion ts Town of Vail Park Parcel 1 ,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 ' ~9Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 d 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Grand Total, Potential Scenarios linlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 za Landmark Tower 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 25 Vail 21 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 1,600 zA 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 ' 2A a 375 2 30 1lontaneros (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 31 Treetops (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 32 Vail International (1975) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 z 33 V"ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 34 Vailglo Lodge 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 35 Vantage Point (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 z.o a 375 z 36 Westwind (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Grand Totals Scenario A-2. Four story _ building, weighted towards o - Dwelling Unit product on d c new development ~ a C m o cv+ 0 o G C ~ N ~ ~ 1 m L a ~ C ~ ~ ~ • ~ o ~ ? 9 ~ ° 4 pp ~ 9 ~ ~ C C p i . C ~ G •i • S C C Q •w . ~ CQ ~ ~ . ~ °O 00 ~ _ 3 u L y _ `o o ~ a ~ < OC c ~i. p ~ ~ e`o u ~ i ~ ? a m 1 eo C t •_K ~ = E 'e v - u ~ 9 C ~ a ~ °p Qi v ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) New Develooment 1 North Day Lot 20'% o% So / 100 % 52,942 100% o'% o"/. 57,103 12,271 21.49 % 2 West Day Lot 20 / 0% 80 % 100 % 192,381 100 % 0-% 0% 206,154 $0,850 24.67 % 3 VA Service Yard So % 0/ 50 % 100 % 173,222 100 % 0'%6 0'%. 207,956 50,252 24.16 % 4 Face of Parking Structure 100% 0% 0% 100% 24,661 100% 0% 0%. 34,282 8,089 23.60% SlnTillatEastBusDrop-off 100/ 0/ 0% 100% 10,089 100% 0% 0/ 15,150 3,534 23.33% Subtotals 453,295 520,641 Redeveloament of existin¢ orooerties 7 Concert Hall PIa2a 1001% 01% OU 100% 14,621 100% 0'% 0'% 21,955 5,122 2333'% 8 Vail Associates Core Site 1001%. 0'% 0% 1001Y. 118,291 20% 30-/. 50/ 18158= 51,103 28.14'% 9 LandmarkTownhomes o/ 0% 100'% t00'% 65,482 100% o/ o% 65,482 16,371 25.00% 10 Lazier Arcade 100 / 0'%. 01Y. l00'% 21,227 100 % O%. 0% 33,396 7.740 23.I8 % i 1 LionSquare Nrth Phase 4 (1972) 0'% 0'% 100% 100% 90,612 100% 0'% 0'% 90,612 22,653 :S.W'% 12 Lionsprideandparkingstructure 60i, oIi, 401i looi 37,729 100i o% or 47,187 11324 za.oo-i, Subtotals 347,963 440,214 Additional Densitv Added.. 1 a AnNers (1972) 0/, 0% 100 % ]00"/. 35,025 100 % 0 G 0'% 35,024 5,756 25.00%. 15 l,ifthouse Lodee 0"/„ 0'% O.Y. 100% 16,971 100'% 0'% 0'%. 32,081 4,243 13.23% 16 `IarriottblountainResort(1979) 0'% 0'%. 100% 100% 79,296 100% 0'%, 0% 79,296 19,824 25.00% Subtotals 131,292 146,402 Ground L"evel Retail Expansion 18 Town of Vail PJrk Parcel 100'/ 0'% _ o% 10111% - 50% So'Z. 0'% 3,311. 662 20.00°» !9 LazierArcade toor o/ o/ lao% - Soi roi. oi 7,603 1,521 20.00i Subtotals - 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 932,550 1,118,175 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) 01i. 01L, loo'i. I oo'/ 28.083 tooi o'Z. oi 28,083 7,021 :5.00"A 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 01i, o% iooIi too'/ 81,817 Ioo/, oi. oi, 81.817 20,454 :s.oo-/ 24 LandmarkTower 501Y. 0% 50'% 100'% 45,978 100% 0'%. 0'% 54,759 13,251 24.20% 25 Vail 21 100 1Y. 0'% 01% 100 % 23,030 100 % 0'% 0% 33,901. 7,932 23A0"/. 25 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 ou or too%. tao'/ 171,162 100r or oi 171,162 412,790 25.00r 27 Lionshead Center (1969) tooIu o/ oIi 100% 59,615 loo/ o*i, or 87,759 20,533 23.40i ZS Lodge at Lionshead Phase 2(2970) o/ oi 100% loo'/. 111,561 loo/ o%, o'i 111,551 27,890 zs.oo•r. 29LodgeatLionsheadPhase3(1976) oli, o% toa/ Iooi e0,047 100/ a'/, o-i 80,047 20,012 25.00r 30 N(ontaneros (1972) 30 / 0 U 70 % 100 % 88.473 100 % 0%. 0'% 97,892 21,002 24.52^/. 31 Treetops(1972) 50'% 0% 50"A 100% 60,779 100% 0'%, 0% 72,386 17,516 24.20°/. 32 Vaillnternational(1975) 0/ 0% 100% 100% 171,144 100% 0% 0% 171.144 42.786 25.00% 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 40'% 0'% 60'% 100'% 248.650 1001% 0% 0% 285,240 69,481 21J6•/. 34 Vailglo Lodge o%, 0/, looi, tooi 61,067 100% o-i. or 61,067 15,267 25.00i 35 VrntagePoint(1972) 0% 0/ 1 00'% 100'% 128.195 100% 0/ 0% 128,195 32.049 25.00% 36 Westwind(1969) 0'%. 0% 100% 100%, 80,735 100% 80,735 20,184 24.00"/• Subtotals 1,440,337 1,545,749 Grand Totals 2,372,886 2,663,925 Scenario A-2. Four story building, weighted towards . Dwelling Unit product on new development fi ~ L4 h t d 2 Q ~ e U` ~ ~ y = L4 Building Name (a.k.a.) d ~ ~ > c = = ~ ~ 4 a New Develoament 1\orth Day Lot 4,161 624 3¢37 52,942 52,941.71 11,647 41,295 - - - 2West Day Lot 13,773 2,755 11,018 192,381 192,381 48,095 144,286 - - - 3 VA Service Yard 34,733 6,947 27.787 173.222 173,222 43,306 129,917 - - - 4 Face of Parking Structure 9,621 1,924 7,697 24,661 24,661 6,165 18,495 - - - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,061 1,012 4,049 10,089 10,089 2,522 7,567 - - - Subtotals _54,088 Redevelopment of existine properties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 7,331 1,467 5,867 14,621 14,620.96 3,655 10,966 - - - 8 Vail Associates Core Site 63,291 12,658 50,633 118,291 23.655 5,915 17,743 35,487 8.872. 26,616 9 Landmark Townhomes - - - 65,482 65,482 16.371 49,112 - - - i o Lazier Arcade 12,169 2,434 9,735 21,227 21,227 5.307 15,920 - - - i 1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) - - - 90,612 90,612 22,653 67,959 - - - tz Lionspride and parking structure 9,458 1,e92 7,566 37,729 37,729 9,432 28,297 - - - Subtotals 73,801 Additional Densitv Added.. u Antlers (1972) - 35,025 35,025.12 8.756 26,269 - - - .5 Lifthouse Lodge - - - 16,971 16,971 4,243 12,728 - - - 16 tilarriOtt NIoUlltaln RCSOrt (1979) _ _ - 79,296 79,296 19,824 59,472 - - - Subtotals - G'round Level Retail Expansion 18Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,312 662 2,650 - - - - - - ' ~v Lazier Arcade 7,503 1,521 6,093 - - - - - - ' Subtotals 8,732 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 linlikelv Redevelo ment- 2x Enzian Condominiums (1973) - - - 28,083 28,093.13 79021 21,062 - - - 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 81,817 81,817 20A54 61,363 - - - - - ' zr LandmarkTower 8,781 1,756 7,024 45,978 45,978 11,495 34,484 25 Vail21 10.872 2,174 8.698 23.030 23,030 5,757 17,272 - - ' - - - 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - - - 171,162 171,162 42,790 12"71 - - - 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 28,144 5,624 22,515 59,615 59,615 ts,vo.s 44,711 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - . - 111,561 111,561 27,890 93,671 - - - 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - - - e0,o47 80,047 20,012 60,035 - - - 30 Nlontaneros (1972) 9,418 1,884 7,534 88,473 88.473 22,118 66,355 - - - - - - 31 Treetops (1972) 11,607 2,321 9,286 60,779 60,779 15,195 45,584 32 Vail International (1975) - - - 171.144 171,144 42,786 128.338 - - ' 13 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 36,590 7,318 29,272 '248,650 248,650 62,163 186,488 - - - 34 Vailglo Lodge - - - 61,067 61,067 15,267 45,800 - - ' 35 Vantage Point (1972) - - - 128,195 128,195 32,049 96,147 - - - 36 Westwind (1969) 80,735 80,735 20,184 60,551 - - - Subtotals 84,330 _ Graud Totals 220,951 Scenario A-2. Four story building, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ ~ a d ~ .r C ~ ~ Q ~ a o°~ a a F a y L' 2 te. C ~ c`' ~ ° ti U t~ i~ v F E F F E F Building Name (a.k.a.) Q Q Q = i i i z i z ~ New Develooment t \orth Day Lot 57,103 26 103 - - - - z West Day Lot 206,154 90 361 - - - - 3 VA S¢rviCe Yard 207,956 81 325 - - - - 4 Face of Parking Structure - - - 31,282 12 46 - - - - s Infill at East Bus Drop-off 15,150 S tv - - - Subtotals - 213 854 - - - - Redevelonment of existin¢ properties 7 Concert Hail Plaza 21,955 7 27 - - - - 8 Vail ASSOCiateS COre Slte 59,146 23,658 35,487 181,582 11 44 17 67 95 189 9 l.andmarkTownhomes - - - 65,482 31 123 - - - - 10 Lazier Arcade 33,396 10 40 - - - - tt Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 90,612 42 170 - - - - iz Lionspride and parking structure _ 47,187 18 71 Subtotals 59,146 119 475 17 67 95 189 Additional Densitv Added.. IJ AnUers (1972) _ 35,025 16 66 - - - - ~5 Lifthouse Lodge 16,971 8 32 - - - - ib Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 79,295 37 iav - - - - Subtotals - 62 246 - - - - Ground Lercl Ret:iil Exoansion 18 Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,312 - - - - - - 19 Lazier Arcade - - - 7,603 - - - - - Subtotals - - - - - - - Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 59,146 394 1,575 17 67 95 189 Lnlikelv Redevelo meot- 2? Enzian Condominiums (1973) - 28,083 13 53 - - - - 23 Lionshead Inn (l.ostello) 81,817 38 153 - - - - za LandmarkTower 54,759 22 96 - - - - :i 'v'9il 21 - - - 33.902 11 43 - - - - 26 Lion Squarc Lodge Phases 1-3 171,162 So 321 - - - - 27 Lionshead Centcr(1969) 87,759 28 112 - - - - 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - - - 111,561 52 209 - - - - zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - - - 80,047 38 . iso - - - - ao Ntontaneros (1972) 97,892 41 166 - - - - 31 Treetops(1972) 72,386 28 Ita - - - - 32 Vail International (1975) 171,141 80 321 - - - - 33 Yail Spa Condominiums (1979) 285,240 117 466 - - - - 34 Vailglo Lodge 61,067 iv ita - - - - 35 Vantage Point (1972) 128,195 60 240 - - - - 36 Westwind (1969) 80,735 38 151 - - - - Subtotals - 675 2,701 - - - - Grand Totals 59,146 1,069 4,276 17 67 95 189 Scenario A-2. Four story building, weighted towards - Dwelling Unit product on new development C O •V m ~ e C ~ e+ `a V ~ u C, d O ~ E 4 e a `u a ~ ~ti a ~ Y C l ~ " ~ N a m 'i. V 4: U ~ d ti _ d 'u ~ ^ a U 'S ~C C u ~ i v y c u d C c F E ~ o y o [ e v` W y & u U ~ E E U E d ~ 'y z y ~ C: ~ J ~ C: 2 a Building Name (a.k.a.) Q z F ~ F t\'ew Develoament i North Day Lot 5.5 19 0.4 to 0.4 - 0.75 - 30 0.76 23 2 West Day Lot 5.5 61 0.4 36 OA - 0.75 - 97 1 73 3 VA Service Yard 5.5 153 0.4 32 0.4 - OJS - 185 1 141 q Face of Parking Structure 5.5 42 oA 5 0.4 - 0.75 - 47 1 36 g infill at East Bus Drop-off 5.5 22 0.4 2 0.4 - 0.75 - 24 1 18 Subtotals 297 85 - - 383 Redevelopment of existin¢ aroperties - 7 Concert HaII Plaza 5.5 32 0.4 3 0.4 - 0.75 - 35 1 27 s Vail Associates Core Site 5.5 278 0.4 4 OA 7 095 71 361 1 274 9 LandmarkTownhomes 5.5 - 0.4 12 0.4 - 0.75 - 12 1 9 to Lazier Arcade 5.5 Si 0.4 4 0.4 - 0.75 - 58 1 44 ti Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 5.5 - 0.4 » 0.4 - 0.75 - 17 1 13 12 Lionspride and parking structure 9,5 42 0.4 7 0.4 - 0.75 - 49 1 37 Subtotals 406 47 7 71 531 Additional Densitv Added.. 1 a .4ntlers (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 7 0.4 - 0.75 - 7 1 5 15 Lifthouse Lod,o,e 5.5 - 0.4 3 0.1 - 0.75 - 3 1 Z 16 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 5.5 0.4 15 oA - oJS - IS t 11 Subtotals - ZS - - ZS Ground Level Retail Expansion ts Town of Yail Park Parcel 5.5 IS 0.4 - 0.4 - OJS - IS t 11 19 Lazicr Arcade 5.5 33 OA - 0.3 - 0.75 - 33 1 ZS Subtotals 48 - - - 48 Grand Total Potential Scenarios 751 I58 7 71 987 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 5.5 - 0.4 5 0.4 - 0.75 - 5 ~ 4 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) s.s - 0.4 is oA - 0.75 - ts t 12 Za Landmark Tower 5.5 39 0.4 9 0.4 - 0.75 - 47 I 36 zs Vail21 s.s 48 0.4 a 0.4 - 0.75 - sz i ao 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 5.5 - 0.4 32 0.4 - 0J5 - 32 1 24 27 Lionshead Center (1969) s.s 124 0.4 u 0.4 - 0.75 - 135 1 103 za I.odge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 5.5 - 0.4 21 o.s - 0.75 - 21 t 16 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 5.5 - 0.4 ts 0.4 - 0.75 - ts t tt 30 MontBneros (1972) 5.5 41 0.4 17 0.4 - 0.75 - 58 1 44 31 Treetops (1972) 5.5 St 0.4 11 0.4 - 0.75 - 62 1 47 32 Vail International (1975) 5.5 - 0.4 32 OA - 0.75 - 32 1 Za 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 5.5 161 0.4 47 0.4 - 0.75 - 208 1 158 34 Vailglo Lodge 5.5 - 0.4 11 0.4 - OJS - 11 1 9 35 'v'antage Point (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 24 0.4 - 0.75 - 24 1 1$ 36 Westwind (1969) 5.5 - 0.4 IS 0.1 - 0.73 - 15 1 12 Subtotals 464 270 - - 734 Grand Totals 1,215 428 7 71 1,720 Scenario A-2. Four story building, weighted towards ' Dwelling Unit product on : e new development = ~ v o p eo = L J y I L C/i a~ - L z ~ Cr M M C ~ C V u ~ C C ~ Z 7 O c~ fs = Q ~ ~ ia T 1 T L 3 ~ ~ •C i 0 • W (iC ~ a a 3 ; e ~ o fY/~ fY/~ Q ty/1 O W i = Y ~ O v ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) 0 c a a a ti c < \ew Develoament 1\orth Day Lot 150 101 2,613 253.13 0 138 0 2,613 30 % 75^/„ 651% 2 WestDayLot 150 101 9,131 253.13 0 138 0 9,131 30% 75% 65% 3 VA Service Yard 150 101 8,221 253.13 0 138 0 8,221 30% 75% 65% 4 Face of Parking Structure 150 lOl 1.170 253.13 0 138 0 1,170 30%. 75 % 65 % g Infill at East Bus Drop-off 150 101 379 253.13 0 138 0 479 30'% 75% 65% Subtotals 21,614 0 0 21,614 Redeveloament of existinQ aroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 150 101 694 253 0 138 0 694 30%. 75%, 65% 8 Vail Associates Core Site 150 IOt 1,123 253 4,211 138 13,095 18,428 30% 75% 65% v Lxndmark Townhomes 150 101 3.I08 253 0 138 0 3,108 30'% 75'% 65 % lo Lazier Arcade 150 101 1,007 253 0 138 0 1,007 30 % 75%. 65 / it LionSquareNrthPhase4(1992) tso 101 4,301 253 o 138 o 4,301 30i 751% 65% 12 Lionspride and parking structure tso ioi 1,791 253 0 138 0 1,791 30 i. 75i. cs% Subtotals 12,023 4,211 13,095 297329 Additional Densitv Added.. IJ Antlers (1972) 150 101 1,662 253 0 138 0 1,662 30% 75% 65% 15 Lifthouse Lodge 150 101 805 253 0 138 0 805 30'%. 75'% 65'% 16 Niarriott M1[ountain Resort (1979) 150 tol 3,763 253 0 138 0 3,763 30'% 75'%, 65'/ Subtotals 6,231 0 0 6,231 Greund Level Retail Exoansion ~s I Town of Vail Park Parcei 150 toi 0 253 0 138 0 0 3o1i. 751i6 6s~i. 19 Lazicr Arcade 150 101 0 253 0 138 0 0 30'% 75'/, 65'% Subtotals 0 0 0 0 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 39,869 4,211 13,095 57,174 linlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 150 101 1.333 253 0 138 0 1,333 30% 75/ 65% 23 Lionsheadlnn(Lostello) 150 101 3,883 253 0 138 0 3.883 30% 75% 65% 24 LandmarkTower 150 IOI 2,182 253 0 138 0 2,182 30/ 75'%. 65% ZS Vail 21 150 101 1,093 253 0 138 0 1,093 30'% 75'% 65% 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 150 tm 8,123 253 0 138 o 8,123 30% 75% 65% n Lionshead Center (1969) 150 101 2,829 253 0 138 0 2,829 30'%. 7517 65% zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 150 101 5Z95 253 0 138 o 5.295 301i 751i 65/ zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) ISO 101 3,799 253 0 138 0 3,799 301%. 75 % 65 % 30 Ntontaneros (1972) 150 101 4,199 253 0 138 0 4,199 30% 75 % 65'% 31 Treetops (1972) 150 101 2,885 253 0 138 0 2,885 30'% 75'%. 65'% 32 Vaillnternational(1975) 150 101 8,123 253 0 138 0 8,123 30'% 75%. 65% 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 150 101 11,801 253 0 138 o 11,801 30/ 75%. 65/ sa Vailglo Lodge 150 101 2,898 253 0 138 0 2,898 30'% 751% 65% 35 Vantage Point (1972) 150 101 6,084 253 0 138 0 6,094 30/ 751/ 65% 36 Westwind(1969) 150 lol 3,832 253 0 138 0 3,832 30/ 75/ 65% Subtotals 68,360 0 0 68,360 Grand Totals 108,229 4,211 13,095 125,534 Scenario A-2. Four story building, weighted towards . Dwelling Unit product on new development M Y b 4 a ~~y yy h ~ ~ a a e a p t" 3 ~ s Y a~ i C a a k N 3 •e a ~ a d ~ o z : e ~ ~ i ° E = C .y. w h •C G p' y ' Ly L, 4 ~C 4 [ 4 ~ Y V d ~ r C ~ C ~ 4 ~ n c' Y C ` ~`',•'rBuilding Name (a.k.a.) o New Develoament 1 tiorth Day LOt 3,537 26 31 - - - - 31 2,613 23 19 2 W'est Day Lot 11,018 90 ]OS - - - - 108 9,131 73 34 3 VA S2rvice 1'ard 27,787 gl 97 97 8,221 IJI 31 q Face of Parking Structure 7,697 12 li - - - - 14 1,170 36 47 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 4,049 5 6 - - - - 6 479 IS 17 Subtotals 54,088 213 256 - - - - 256 21,614 291 30 Redevelopment of existin¢ properties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 5,867 7 8 - - - - 8 694 27 26 s Vail Associates Core Site 50,633 11 13 17 50 95 123 186 18,428 271 5 v LandmarkTownhomes - 31 37 - - - - 37 3,108 9 45 lo Lazier Arcade 9,735 10 12 t: 1,007 44 30 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) - 42 si - - - - 51 4,301 13 as 12Lionspride and parking structure 7,566 18 21 - - - 21 1,791 37 34 Subtotals 73,801 119 142 17 50 95 123 31i 29,329 404 24 Additional Densitv Added.. ta Antlers (1972) - 16 20 - - - - 20 1,662 5 55 15 Lifthouse Lodge - g 10 Io 805 2 22 16 `[arriott htountain ResoPt(1979) - 37 45 - - - 45 3,763 II 41 Subtotals _ 62 74 74 6,231 19 39 Ground Level Retail Exoansion ~ ~s Town of Vail Park Parcel 2,650 - - - - - - - - - 19 Lazier Arcade_ 6,083 - - - - - - - - 25 - Subtotals 8,732 - - - - - - - - 37 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 394 473 17 50 95 123 645 57,174 750 31 Unlikel Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) - 13 16 - - - - 16 1,333 a 45 23 Lionshefld Inn (Lostello) - 38 46 - - - - 46 3,883 12 41 24 LandmarkTower 7,024 22 26 - - - - 26 2,182 36 27 25 Vail 21 8,698 11 13 - - • - 13 1,093 ao 30 26 4ion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - so 96 - - - - 96 8,123 za as 27 Lionshead Center(1969) 22,515 28 34 - - - - 34 2,829 103 30 2e Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - 52 63 - - - - e3 sZVS 16 38 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - 38 45 - - - - 15 3,799 11 38 30 Montaneros(1972) 7,534 41 50 - - - - so 4,199 oa ao 31 Treetops (1972) 9,286 28 34 - - - - 34 2,885 47 32 32 V'ail (nternational (1975) - ao 96 - - - - 96 8,123 24 45 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 29,272 117 140 - - - - IJO 11,801 158 33 34 Vailglo Lodge - 29 34 - - - - 34 2,898 9 45 35 Vantage Point (1972) - 60 72 - - - - 72 6,084 IS 38 36 Westwind (1969) - 38 45 - - - - 45 3,832 12 45 Subtotals 84,330 675 810 - - - - 810 68,360 558 38 Grand Totals 220,951 1,069 1,283 17 50 95 123 1,456 125,534 1,308 34 SCENARIO B-1 . Five stories, weighted towards fractional fee unit development io ~ Scenario B-1. Five story building, weighted towards . Fractional Fee product on new development N ' Y ~ u A a m •L v C m ~ Y e ` e u u a u N u $ ? L ~ C = u o m = ~ e a ~ 'o p ~ ~ O G m L~ ^ '-VC w L~ ~ `o a « o o` ! a o > ~ 4 ~ 9 0 o a ^ ` ~ u V e C 'e C C ~ ~ ` Q = p a w ` ~ o a ~ N ,o e e Q G = - E Z' V 0O ` w • ~ O ~ ? _ O u 6l d O B. ' p ~ O ~ ; ` i ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) 9 ~L z C cc < New Develooment t\orth Day Lot 59,449 70% 41,614 35'% 20$07 70/ 14,565 5 56% 8,156 30% 15% 40'% 22% 2West Day Lot 114,775 70 % 80,W 60i 68,865 80°/. 55,092 5 56'% 30,852 30% 20 % 40 / 25 / 3 VA Service Yard 115,778 70 % 81,045 60 % 69,467 80 % 55,573 5 56 % 31,121 30 % 20'% 401% 25 % a Face of ParWng Structure 10,690 70 % 7,483 90 % 9,621 90 % 8,659 5 56 % 4,849 20 % 20%, 40'% 25'% 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 70 % 3,936 90 % 5,061 80 % 4,049 5 56 / 2,267 30 1% 20 / JO % 25 / Subtotals 306,315 214,421 173,821 Redeveiopment of existin¢ orooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 70 % 7,898 65 % 7,334 80 % 5,867 5 56'% 3,286 30 % 20'% 40'% 25 a Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 70'% 68,160 65 % 63,291 75'% 47,468 5 56'% 26,58: 30 % 20'% JO % 25'% v Landmark Townhomes 30,000 70 % 21,000 70 % 21,000 85 % 17,850 5 56'% 9,996 30 % 20'% JO % 25'% 10 LazierArcade 14,316 70% 10,021 as% 12,169 70i 8.518 5 56%, 4,770 30i. 20% 40% 25%. t 1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 70 % 29,059 70'% 29,059 85'% 24,700 5 56'% 13,832 30 % 20% 40'% 23 % 1: Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 70 % 15,763 70'/ 15,763 so / 12,610 5 56 % 7,062 30U 20 / ao G 25 % Subtotals 217,001 151,901 148,615 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 13,000 70 % 9,100 90 % 11,700 80 % 9.360 5 56 % 5,242 30 % 20%, JU % 25 % ~5 LiRhouse Lodge 15,905 70% 11,134 95% 15,110 90'% 13,599 2 56'% 7,615 20% 20'% 40'% 25% 16 ylarriottblountainResort(1979) 39,123 70'% 27,356 65'% 25,430 85% 21,615 5 56'% 12,105 30% 20% 40'% 25%3ubtotals 68,028 47,620 52,240 Ground Level Retail Exaansion is 1Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 70% 2,575 vo% 3,312 oIi o 1 oli" o oi 20% aoi zsi i9 LazierArcade 8,448 70i 5,914 vo% 7,603 oi o 1 oi o o/ 20i, aoi 25r Subtotals 12,128 8,490 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 603,472 422,430 385,591 lfnlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condomitfiums (1973) 12,866 70 % 9,006 701% 9,006 85 % 7,655 5 56% 4,287 30 / 20'L. JO % 25'% 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 40,367 70'% 28,257 65% 26,239 85% 22,303 5 56'%. 12,490 30% 20% 40% 25% 24 Landmark Tower 35,122 70 % 24,585 50 % 17,561 85 % 14,927 5 56 % 8,359 30 % 20 % 40 % 25 % 25 Vail 21 15,532 70'/ 10,872 70 % 10,872 85 % 9,242 5 56'% 5,175 30 1% 20'% 40 % 25 % 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 78,416 70'% 54,891 70'%. 54,891 85'%. 46,658 5 56'% 26,128 30 % 20'%. JO% 25'% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 40,206 70'% 28,144 70'% 28,144 85 % 23,923 5 56 % 13,397 30 1%, 20'%. 90 % 25'% 28 Lodgeat Lionshead Phase I& 2(1970) 59,629 70r 41,740 60-/, 35,777 ss/ 30,411 5 56% 17,030 30/. 20r aor zsr 29 LodgeatLionsheadPhase3(1976) 42,785 70i 29,949 60i 25,671 es% zt,szo 5 56% 12,219 30i zoi. aoi zsu 30 iNIontaneros (1972) 44,848 70 % 31,394 70 % 31,394 85 % 26,685 5 56 % 14.943 30 % 20 % 40 % 25 % 31 Treetops(1972) 38,690 70"/. 27,083 60'% 23,214 85"/. 19,732 5 56'% 11,050 30% 20% 40% 25'% 32 N'aillnternational(1975) 78,408 70'% 54,886 70% 54,886 85% 46,653 5 56% 26,126 30% 20% 40% 25% 33 N'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 152,460 70 % 106,722 60 % 91,476 85 % 77,755 5 56 % 43,543 30 % 201%, JO % 25% 34 Vailglo Lodge 279977 70% 19,581 70% 19,584 85% 16,616 5 56'% 9}22 30% 20% 40'% 251% 35 Vantage Point (1972) 689520 70% 47,964 60% 4I,112 85°/. 34.945 5 56% 19,569 30% 20'%. JO%. 251% 36 Westwind (1969) 36,988 70i 25,892 70i 25,892 85% 22,008 5 56 / 12,324 30 / 20-i, ao i 25-i, Subtotals 7729814 5409970 495,718 Grand Totals 1,3769286 963,400 8819309 ~ Scenario B-1. Five story . building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development d a ~ 0 H ~ R ~ .L y R v ~ m n y y w u v R d > G a < w e a o a ~ ~ . • L ~ d N C CI ~ a s E ~ E E , F E E _ ` .0 ^ C 9 C `o u `o = a r - a v d e a C ° ~ ° 4 e 4 a ? a Building Name (a.k.a.) ~ z d Q y Z A. c ~ e < e hew Develooment i North Day Lot 1,500 2.0 2.0 0 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 2 West Day Lot 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 0 375 z 3 VA Service Yard 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 a Face of Parking Structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 s 375 2 s Infili at East Bus Drop-off 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Redevelopment of existina prooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 8 Vail ASSOCiatCS COre Sit¢ 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 s LandmarkTownhomes 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z to Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 t i Lion Square IYrth Phase 4(1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 12 Lionspride and parking structure 1,500 2.0 2.0 a 1,500 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Additional Densitv Added.. ~a AnUers (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 s 375 z ts Lifthouse Lodge 1.600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 175 2 16 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 Subtotals Ground Level Retail Exoansion ' - ~a Town of Vail Park Parcel 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 19 Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Grand Total, Potential Scenarios lInlikelv Redevelo ment- ZZ Enzian Condominiums (1973) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 J'S 2 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 za Landmark Tower 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1.600 2.0 2.0 a 375 i 25 Yail 21 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 zc Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 ; 375 i 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 z zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 s 375 2 30 Nlontaneros (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 s 375 z 31 Treetops (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 s 375 2 32 Vail International (1975) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 i 375 2 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 34 Vailglo Lodge 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 35 Vantage Point (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 i 375 2 35 Westwind (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Grand Totals Scenario B-1. Five story . building, weighted towards o , - Fractional Fee product on 1Z ~ c new development L ` O C rr. R 4. y O u~ e $ G C ~ q 9 ~ p 6T. 7 ~ 01 Q C C ~ > K d e v ~ ~ d C ~ ~ vl C C O ' 7 7 ° ~ pp p 9 ~ ~ ~ O O C .7 J C ~ O E ^ Oi DO 00 9 Q U 'yT ~ u y ~ - ~ 9 O O ~ - ` C G QC G • w q e`o p `o ~ c ^ c e `a ` . o ~ G ~ v~ i n OC K e - m eo m C e = m 6 u 'r~ c e e = ~ e ~ e a `e a e~ ' ' ? F E ~ "m 9 ~ ~ ° ~ i ° ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) a ~ o ; F ~ F v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a New Develooment 1 North Day Lot 20 / 0'% 80 i100 % 63,137 0% 100'% 0/ 67,299 14,5I4 21.57^r. zWest Day Lot 20 0% 80 % 100 % 230,946 0% 100% 0% 244,719 60.491 24.72'% 3 VA ServiCe 1'ard 50% 0% 50 % l0U"/. 2t2,123 01/6 100'% 0% 246,857 59,978 2130"/. 4 Face of Parking Structure 100 % 0% 0% 100'% 31,588 0% 100 % 0% 41Z09 9.821 23.83 % 5 Infiil at East Bus Drop-off 100% 0% 0% 100% 12,923 0% 100% 0% 17,984 4,213 23.59/ Subtotals 550,717 618,067 Redeveloament of existin¢ nroperties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 100% 0% 0% 100% 18,728 OGG 100% 0'%1 26,062 6,149 23.59'/ 8 Vail ASSOCiat¢S COre SI[e 100%. 0% 0% 100'% 151.519 20'% 30'%. 50'% 211.810 61,902 25.82 9 LandmarkTownhomes 0/ 0% 100% 100% 77,977 0'% 100% 0% 77,977 19,494 25.0 SO Lazier Arcade 100 % 0% 0% 100 % 27,190 0% 100'% 0% 39358 9,231 23.4b tl C.ionSquareNrthPhase4(1972) 0% 0% ]OOG 100% 107,902 0% 100% OU 107,902 26,976 25.00% 12 Lionspride and parking structure 60% 0% 40% 100% 46,556 0% 100'% 0% 56.014 13,531 24.16^/« Subtotals 429,872 522,124 Additional Densitv Added.. IJ AnUers(1972) 0"A 0% 100'/ 100% 41,577 100'/ o'% 0'%. 41.577 10,394 25A0% ts LifthouseLodge oIi oIi or IoaIi 16,971 100'/. oIi oli, 32.081 4,243 13.23r 16 NIarriott iNlountain Resort (1979) 0% 0% 100'% 100% 94,426 100'% OG. 0% 94A26 23,607 25.00% Subtotals 152,975 168,085 Ground Level Retail Exoansion I s Town of Vail Park Parcel 100i oi - oIi IooIi - Soi. so%. o1z. 3.312 66: 20.00% 19 Lazier Arcade 100%. o/ o% loo % - 50 % 50 % o% 7,603 1,521 20.00'/ I Subtotals _ 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 1,133,565 1,319,190 Llnlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 EnzianCondominiums(1973) 0% 0% 100% 100% 33,432 100'% 01Y. 0% 33,442 8,360 25.00i 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 0% 0'% 100 % 100 % 97,429 100 % 0 U 0% 97,429 24,357 25.00 % za Landmark Tower 50'% 0% 50 % 100 % 56,427 100 % 0'% 01%. 65,208 15,863 2433 % 25 V81I 21 100 % 01/1, 0% 1001% 29,499 100% 0'% 0% 40,371 9,549 23.65 % 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 oi oi 1001i. tooi 203,822 too%, o'i6 a/ 203,e22 50,956 25.00% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 100% D% o/ too/ 76,361 100% o/ oIU 104,505 24,719 23.65/ zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) o/ or tooIi 100/ 132,849 100/, 01i. ou 132,949 33,212 25.00/ 29 LodgeatLiansheadPhase3(1976) oIi oi loo/, too/ 95,321 too'i oIi o/ 95,321 23,830 25.00i 30 iN[ontaneros(1972) 30% 0% 70% 100% 107,153 100'% 0/ 0% 116,571 28,672 24.60% 31 Treetops (1972) 50'% 0% 50'% 1001% 74,591 100'% 0'% 0% 86.198 20,969 21.33 % 32 Vaillnternational(1975) 0% 0'% 100%. 100%. 203,801 100'%. 0'% 0'% 203,80I 50,950 25.00% 33 N'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 40'% 0% 60% 100% 303,078 100'% 0'% 0% 339,669 83.088 21.46% aa Vailglo Lodge 0"/. 0% 100'% 100 % 72,719 100 % 0% 0% 72,719 18,180 25.00 % 35 Vantage Point (1972) 0% o% 1001% 100% 152,657 100'% a% o'% 152,657 38,164 25.0C' 36 NN'estwind(1969) 0% 0% 100% 100% 96,141 IOOG. 0%. 0/ 96,I41 24.035 25.C Subtotals 1,735,289 1,840,702 Grand Totals 2,868,854 3,159,892 Scenario B-1. Five story _ building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development ~ ~ N M ~ ~ - e t. ~ 4 ~ - • _ Building Name (a.k.a.) d ~ ~ ~ ; c ~ ~ ~ ~ - IVew Development i tiorth Day Lot 4,161 624 3,537 63.137 - - - 63,137 13,890 49,237 2W¢st D9y LOt 13,773 2,755 11,018 230,946 - - - 230,946 57,736 173,209 3 YA Service Yard 34,733 6,947 27.787 212.124 - - - 212.124 53,031 159.093 J Face of Parking Structure 9,621 1,924 7,697 31,588 - - - 31,588 7,897 23.691 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,061 1,012 4,049 12,923 - - - 12,923 3,231 9,69: Subtotals 54,088 Redeveloament of existine orooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 7.334 1,467 5,867 18,728 - - - 18,728 4,682 14,045 8 Vail Associates Core Site 63,291 12,658 50,633 151,519 30,304 7,576 22,728 45,456 11.364 34,092 9 LandmarkTownhOmes - _ _ 77,977 - - - 77,977 19,494 58,183 10 Lazier Arcade 12,169 2,134 9,735 27,190 - - - 27,190 6,797 20,392 u Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) _ _ _ 107,902 - - - 107,902 26,976 80,927 12 Lionspride and parking structure 9,458 1,892 7,566 46,556 - - - 46,556 11.639 34,917 Subtotals 73,801 Additional Densitv Added.. w AnUers (1972) - 41,577 41,577.12 10,394 31,183 - - - 15 Lifthouse Lodge 16,971 16,971 4Z43 12,728 - - - 16 NIarriott blountain Resort (1979) - 91,426 94,426 23,607 70,820 - - - Subtotals _ Ground Level Retail Exoansion 18 Town of Vail PArk Parcel 3,312 562 2.650 - - - - - - - .9 Lazier Arcade 7,603 1,521 6,083 - - - - - - - Subtotals 8,732 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 tinlikel Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) _ 33,442 33,441.82 U60 25,081 - - - 23 LIOnSh¢ed IOtI (LOSt¢IIO) _ _ _ 97,329 97,429 24,357 73,072 - - - zd Landmark Tower 8,781 1,756 7,024 $6A27 56,427 14,107 42J20 - - - - - - 25 Vai121 10.872 2.170 8,698 29,499 29.499 7,375 22,124 25 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 . . _ 203,822 203,822 50,956 152,867 - - - 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 28,144 5,629 22,515 76,361 76,361 19,090 57,271 - - - za Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) . . _ 132,849 132,849 33,212 99,636 - - - 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) _ _ . 95.321 95,321 33,930 71,490 - - - 30 1[ontaneros (1972) 9,418 1,884 7,534 107,153 107,153 26,788 80,364 - - - 31 Treetops (1972) 11,607 2,321 9,286 74,591 74,591 18,648 55,943 - - - 32 Vail International (1975) . _ _ 203,801 203,801 50,950 152,851 - - - 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 36,590 7,318 29,272 303,078 303,078 75,770 227,309 - - - 34 Vailglo Lodge _ . _ 72,719 72,719 18,180 51,539 - - - 35 Vanlage Point (1972) 132,657 152,657 38,164 114,493 - - - 36 NN'estwind (1969) 9e,141 96,141 24,035 72.106 - - - Subtotals 84,330 Grand Totals 220,951 Scenario B-1. Five story building, weighted towards , Fractional Fee product on new development ~ ~ ~ ~ M d ~ a a £ a y G Z p 'a" c~ a j 4 c d C ~ o ti ~ c U E: ~ d w` i d ce~i Building Name (a.k.a.) e e e ` t z E i z z J New Develonment 1 NoPth Day Lot 67,299 - - 30.78 123 - - 2 West Day Lot 241,719 - - toS 433 - - 3 VA SCn'iCC YBfd 246,857 - - 99 398 - - 4 Face of Parking Structure 41,209 ts Ss - - s Infill at East Bus Drop-off 17,984 - - 6 24 - - Subtotals 259 1,037 - - Redeveloament of existine arooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza _ _ - 26,062 - - 9 35 - - s Vail Associates Core Site 75,760 30,341 45,456 214,810 14 57 21 as 121 242 v LandmarkTownhomes _ _ _ 77,977 37 146 - - to Lazier Arcade 39358 - - 13 St - - 11 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 107,902 • - 51 202 - - 12 Lionspride and parking structure _ - - 56,014 - zz 87 - - Subtotals 75,760 14 57 152 607 121 242 Addi[ional Densitv Added.. 13 Anders (1972) - - - 41,577 19 78 - - - - IS Lifthouse Lodge 16,971 S 32 - - - - 16 1[arriott Dlountain Resort (1979) 94,426 aa 177 - - - - Subtotals _ 72 287 Ground Level Retail Exnansion is Town of N'ait Park Parcel 3,312 19 Lazier Arcade _ 7,603 Subtotals T _ Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 75,760 86 344 411 1,644 121 242 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) 33,442 16 63 - - - - 23 LionShead Inn (Lostello) 97,429 46 183 - - - - 24 Landmark Tower 65,208 26 106 - - - - 25 Vail21 - - - 40,371 la 55 - - - - 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 203,822 96 382 - - - - 27 Lionshead Center(t969) 104,505 35 143 - - - - zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 132,849 62 249 - - - - zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 95,321 45 •179 - - - - 30 iN(ontaneros(1972) 116,571 So 101 - - - - 31 Treetops(1972) 86,198 35 tso - - - - 3: Vail International (1975) - - - 203,801 96 382 - - - - 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 339,669 142 568 - - - - 34 V'ailglo Lodge 72,719 34 136 - - - - 35 Vantage Point (1972) 152,657 72 286 - - - - 36 Westwind (1969) 96,141 45 180 - - - - Subtotals - 813 3,254 - - - - Grand Totals 75,760 899 3,597 411 1,644 121 242 Scenario B-1. Five story building, weighted towards " ~ . Fractional Fee product on new development ~ 0 i ~ 40 z C ~ L = V ~ 41 d T d O ~ L ~ y O ~ ~7 w y 4 ` ~ 'C y C ~ F C d w U ~ V ~ y ~ y ~ m N ~ y ~ y A Y ~ C jR. ~ 0 D ~ y T V 1 O~i d ~ W ~ y 0U ~ E ~ ~ U ~ p E Building Name (a.k.a.) ; 04 a e a Q New Develonment 1\Orth Ddy LOt 5.5 19 OA - 0.4 12 0.75 - 32 0.76 24 2NN est Day Lot 5.5 61 0.4 - 0.4 43 0.75 - IOi 1 79 3VA Servicc Yard 5.5 153 0.4 - OA 40 0.75 - 193 1 146 a Face of Parking Structure 5.5 42 o.s - 0.4 6 0.75 - 48 1 37 s Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5.5 22 0.4 - oA 2 0.75 . 25 1 tv Subtotals 297 - 104 - 401 Redevelooment of existine nroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza s.s 32 0.4 - 0.4 a 0.75 - 36 1 27 8 Vail Associates Core Site 5.5 278 OA 6 0.4 9 OJS 91 384 l 292 9 Landmark Townhomes 5.5 - 0.4 - 0.4 15 0J5 - 15 1 Il 10 Lazier Arcade 5.5 Si 0.4 - 0.4 5 0.75 - 59 1 45 i i Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 5.5 - 0.4 - 0.4 20 0.75 - zo I 15 12 Lionspride and parking structure 5.5 az 0.4 - 0.4 v 0.75 - so 1 38 Subtotals 406 6 61 91 563 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 ,4ntlers (1972) oA 8 0.4 - 0.75 - 8 t 6 15 Lifthouse Lodge s.s - 0.4 3 0.4 - 0.75 - 3 t 2 16 Ntarriott AlountAin Resort (1979) 5.5 - oA ts 0.4 - 0.75 - 18 1 13 Subtotals _ 29 - - 29 Ground Level Retail Exoansion ~a Town of Vail Park Parcel 5.5 15 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - 15 t tt 19 Lazier Arc:lde 5.5 33 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - 33 I 25 Subtotals 48 - - - 48 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 751 34 164 91 1,041 t'nlikelv Redevelo ment- z2 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 5.5 - 0.4 6 0.4 - OJS - 6 t 5 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 5.5 - 0.4 18 0.4 - 0.75 - 18 1 14 24 Landmark Tower 5.5 39 OA 11 0.4 - OJS - 49 l 37 25 Vai121 5.5 48 0.4 6 0.4 - 0.75 - 53 1 41 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 5.5 - 0.4 39 0.4 - 0.75 - 38 1 29 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 5.5 tza 0.4 ta 0.4 - 0.75 - 138 1 105 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 5.5 - 0.4 25 0.4 - 0.75 - 25 1 19 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 5.5 - 0.4 ls 0.4 - 0.75 - 18 t ta 30 NIontaneros (1972) 5.5 41 0.4 20 0.4 - 0.75 - 62 1 47 31 Treetops (1972) 5.5 51 0.4 14 0.4 - 0.75 - 65 1 49 32 Veil International (1975) 5.5 - 0.4 38 0.4 - 0.75 - 38 1 29 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 5.5 161 0.4 57 0.4 - 0.75 - 218 1 166 34 N'ailglo C,odse 5.5 - 0.4 ta 0.4 - 0.7$ . 14 1 to 35 N'antage Point (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 29 0.4 - 0.75 - 29 t 22 36 NN'estwind (1969) 0.4 ls 0.4 - oas - Is t ta Subtotals 464 325 - - 789 Grand Totals 1,215 360 164 91 1,830 I Scenario B-1. Five story building, weighted towards , Fractional Fee product on W. new development ~ ~ ~ o c d < L ~ V e d c c° z' U z v~ ~ ~ ; •t o. Cy^i j a U ~ Q W a. C i, 4~ ~ d "c ci ~ a ~ `u E R e Q ~ Q Building Name (a.k.a.) < a e n c: o ~ a New Develooment I Yorth Day Lot 150 101 0 253.13 7,791 138 0 7,791 30 % 75'% 65 % 2 W'est Day Lot 150 101 0 253.13 27,402 138 0 27,402 30"/« 75 % 65•/. 3 VAServiceYard 150 101 0 253.13 25,169 138 0 25,169 30% 75%. 65% 4 Eace of Parking Structure 150 101 0 253.13 3,748 138 0 3,748 30'% 75 / 65 / 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 150 101 0 253.13 1,533 138 0 1,533 30 % 75'% 65 Subtotals 0 65,644 0 65,614 Redevelooment of existin&properties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 150 101 0 253 2,222 138 0 2,222 30'%, 75'% 65 % 8 Vail Associates Core Site 150 lOt 1,438 253 5,393 138 16,773 23,605 30 % 75 % 65 % v LandmarkTownhomes I50 101 0 253 9,252 138 0 9,252 30'% 75% 65% lo LazierArcade 150 101 0 253 3,226 138 0 3,226 30'% 75'% 65% 11 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) ISO tot o 253 12,8o3 138 o 12,903 30%, 75% 65% Iz Lionspride and parking structure lso tol 0 253 5,524 138 o 5,524 3o1i6 75% 65% Subtotals 1,438 38,421 16,773 56,632 Additional Densitv Added.. la Antlers (1972) 150 101 1,973 253 ' 0 138 0 1,973 30 % 75 % 65 % .s LifthouseLodge 150 101 sos zss o 138 o sos 301i. 75r 65% 16blarriott MountainResort (1979) iso 101 4,482 253 o 138 o 4,482 30u 75i 65% Subtotals 7,260 0 0 7,260 Ground Level Retail Expansion 18 Town of Vail Park Pilrcel 150 101 0 253 0 138 0 0 30'% 75%, 65% ~9 LazierArcade I50 101 0 253 0 1JS 0 0 30'% 75'%. 65% Subtotals 0 0 0 0 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 8,699 I04,064 16,773 129,536 Cinlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 EnzianCondominiums(1973) 150 101 1,587 253 o I38 o 1,587 30% 75% 65% za Lionshcad Inn (Lostello) 150 101 4,624 253 0 138 0 4,624 30% 75% 65% 24 LandmarkTower 150 101 2,678 253 0 138 0 2,678 30% 75"/. 65°/. 25 N'ai121 150 101 1,400 253 0 138 0 1,400 30'% 75% 65% 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 150 101 9,674 253 0 138 0 9,674 30% 751% 65% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 150 101 3,624 253 0 138 0 3,624 30 % 75 % 65 % za Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 150 Im 6,305 253 o tas 0 6,305 30% 75/ bsi 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 150 lot 4,524 253 o 138 o 4,524 30% 75%, 65% 30 nlontaneros(1972) 150 101 5,086 253 0 138 0 5,086 30% 75/ 65% 31 Treetops(1972) 150 101 3,540 253 0 138 0 3,510 30/ 75'% 65% 32 Vail International (1975) 150 101 9,673 253 0 138 0 9,673 30% 75'% 65% 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) lso 101 14,384 253 0 138 o 14,394 30i 75% ss/ 34 Vailglo Lodge 150 101 3,451 253 0 138 0 3,451 30 % 75 % 65 % 35 Vantage Point (1972) 150 101 7,245 253 0 138 0 7,245 301%, 75% 65% 36 Westwind (1969) 150 101 4,563 253 0 138 0 4,563 30 % 75 % 65 % Subtotals 829358 0 0 82,358 Grand Totals 91,057 104,064 16,773 211,894 Scenario B-1. Five story building, weighted towards ~ Fractional Fee product on new development M y `a ~ v Q t t ~ ~ ` t a a c a C : o ~ Vj ? a ? C es a a~ g\ ? L C% i y h ~ ` D j ~ ~ c,'' a C ~ . . : •'e C d ~ ~ Q ~ v C: ` ~ g u r d ~ LW ,c• Building Name (a.k.a.) M1CK' DCV2IODRICIII 1\orth Day Lot 3,537 - - 31 92 - - 92 7,791 24 - 2 West Day Lot 11,018 - - 108 325 - - 325 27,402 79 - 3 VA Service Yard 27,787 99 298 - - 298 25,169 146 . a Face of Parking Structure 7,697 - - IS 44 - - 44 3.748 37 - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 4,049 - - 6 18 - 18 1,533 19 - Subtotals 54,088 - - 259 778 - - 778 65,644 305 - Redevelooment of existine oroaerties 7 Concert Hali Plaza 5,867 - - 9 26 - - 26 zZZZ 27 - 8 Vail Associates Core Site 50,633 14 17 21 64 12/ 158 239 23,605 292 6 9 Landmark Town homes _ 37 Il0 - - Ilo 9,252 11 - io Lazier Arcade 9,735 - - 13 38 - - 38 3,226 45 - t 1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) _ 51 152 - - 152 12,803 15 - 1: Lionspridc and parking structure 7,566 - - 22 65 - - 65 5,524 38 - Subtotals 73,801 14 17 152 455 121 158 630 56,632 428 3 Additiooal Densitv Added.. ts Antlers (1972) _ 19 23 - - - - 23 1,973 6 65 , Lifthouse Lodge _ g jo - - - - io 805 2 22 16 btarriott Alountain Resort (1979) . aa 53 - - - - 53 4,482 13 av Subtotals _ 72 86 - - - - 86 7,260 22 46 Ground Level Retail Es2ansion ~s Town of Vail Park Parcel 2,650 - - - - - - - - 11 - ~9 LazierArcade 6,083 25 - Subtotals 8,732 - - - - - - - - 37 - Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 86 103 411 1,233 121 158 1,494 129,536 791 16 l'nlikelv Redevelo ment- iz Enzian Condominiums (1973) - 16 19 - - - - 19 1,587 5 53 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) - 46 55 - - - - 55 4,624 14 49 24 Landmark Towcr 7,021 26 32 - - - - 32 2,678 37 33 25 Yail21 8.698 14 17 - - - - 17 1,400 Jl 39 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - 96 315 - - - - us 9,674 zv 53 n Lionshead Center(1969) 22,515 36 43 - - - - 43 3,524 105 39 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - 62 75 - - - - 75 6,305 19 45 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - 45 sa 54 4,524 ia as 30 Montaneros (1972) 7,534 50 60 - - - - 60 5,086 47 49 31 Treetops (1972) 9,286 35 42 - - - - 42 3,540 47 39 32 Vail International (1975) - 96 115 - - - - 115 9,671 29 53 33 N'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 29,272 142 170 - - • - 170 I4,384 166 41 34 1"ailglo Lodge - aq 41 - - - - 41 3,451 l0 53 35 Vantage Point (1972) _ 72 86 - - • - 86 7,245 zz as 36 Westwind (1969) _ 45 54 - - - 54 4,563 la 53 Subtotals 84,330 813 976 - - - - 976 82,358 600 46 Grand Totals 220,951 899 1,079 411 1,233 121 158 2,470 211,894 1,391 41 SCENARIO B-2 ' Five stories, weighted towards dwelling unit development Scenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards ' Dwelling Unit product on new development d •L C R 0 w u w d `ee ? y N ~ C e ~ e 00 a 4 ~ w . e a ~ e o ' ` _ ~ C (t 0~. y u , '3 s fi Cc e G ;oi 0 C7 u v1 m w a ti L0 E a: pp y ~C C CC C GI E O ~ ~ Q " „ ~ ~ C d C 'c Q m in - ^ e ~ f v ~ E c ~ v~ u o `o ¦ o` m d _ E. g- Building Name (a.k.a.) ' _ ~ • 9 E z' New Develooment 1 N01'th Day LOt 59,449 70'% 41,614 35 % 20,807 70 % 14,565 S 56 % 8,156 30'% 15% 40 % 22 % 2 WestDayLot 114,775 70% 80,343 60'% 68,565 80'%. 55,092 5 56%, 30,852 301%. 20% 40'% 25% 3 VA Service Yard 115,778 70'% 81,045 60"/. 69,467 80 % 35.573 5 56 % 31.121 30'% 20% 40'% 25'% a Face of Parking Structure 10,690 70'% 7,483 90 % 9,621 90 % 8,659 5 56 % 4,849 201/., 20'% 40 % 25 % 5(nfill at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 70% 3,936 90% 5,061 80% 4,049 5 56% 2,267 30'% 20% JO% 25%. Subtotals 306,315 214,421 173,821 Redeveloament of existin¢ oroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 70 % 7,898 65% 7,334 80'% 5,867 5 56 % 3,286 30 % 20 % 40 25 1%, 8 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 70 % 68,160 65 % 63,291 75 % 47,468 5 56'7 2658= 30'% 20%. 40 % 25 % 9 LandmarkTownhomes 30,000 70% 21,000 70'% 21,000 85'% 17,850 5 56% 9,996 30'% 20'% 40% 25% 10 Lazier Arcade 14,316 70'% 10,021 85 % 12,169 70 % 8.518 S 56 % 4,770 30 % 20'% 40 % 23'% II LionSquare Nrth Phase 4 (1972) 41,513 70/ 29,059 70% 29,059 85% 24,700 5 56% 13,832 30% 20% 40% 25% 12 Lionsprideandperkingstructure 22,518 70/ 15,763 70'% 15,763 80% 12.610 5 56% 7,062 301%, 201% 40% 25'% Subtotals 217,001 151,901 148,615 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 13,000 70% 9,100 90% 11,700 80% 9J60 5 56'~ SZa2 30%~ 20% a0% 25".. .5 Lifthouse Lodge 15,90j 70 % 11,134 95 % 15,110 90 % 13,599 2 56 % 7,615 20 % 20%. JO % 25 % 16 ~Iarriott btountain Resort (1979) 39,123 70'% 27,386 65% 25,430 85'. 21,615 5 56% 12,105 30'% 20'% JO'% 25'% Subtotals 68,028 47,620 52,240 Ground Level Retail Exoansion 1 8 Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 70% 2,576 90/ 3,312 oIi o 1 0'/ o o/, 20/ ao'/ 25/, 19 Lazier Arcade 8,448 70'% 5,914 90 % 7,603 0% 0 1 0% 0 0% 20%. 40 % 25%, Subtotals 12,128 8,490 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 603,472 422,430 385,591 [lnlikelv Redevelo ment- z? EnzianCondominiums(1973) 12,866 70% 9,006 70% 9,006 85/ 7,655 5 56% 4,287 30% 20/. 40% 25%. . 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 40,367 70'% 28,257 65% 26,239 85% 22,303 5 56% 12,490 30% 20'% 40% 25'% 24 Landmark Tower 35,122 70U 24,595 50 % 17,561 85'/ 14.927 5 56'% 8,359 30 % 20 / Jo G 25'/ 25 Vai121 15,532 70"/« 10,872 70% 10,872 85'% 9,242 5 56'% 5,175 301%, 20'% 40'% 25'/ zv Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 78,416 70% 54,891 70'% 54,891 85'% 46,658 5 56'% 26,128 30'% 20'%. 40'% 25'% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 40,206 70-i. 28,144 70i 28,144 ssi 23,923 5 56'/ 13.397 30i 20i 40%. 25%. za Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 59,629 70i 41,740 60i 35,777 asi 30.411 5 56°.c 17,030 30r 20/ ao% 25r 29 LodgeatLionsheadPhase3(1996) 42,785 70'% 29,949 60"/. 25,671 85% 21,820 5 56% 12,219 301% 20% 40/ 25% 30 iN(ontaneros(1972) 44,848 70% 31,394 70"/. 31,394 85% 26,685 5 56% 14,943 30% 20% 40% 25% al Treetops(1972) 38,690 70% 27,083 60% 23,214 85% 19,732 S 56% 11,050 30% 20% 40% 25"/. 32 Vail International (1975) 78,408 70% 53,886 70'% 54,886 85% 46,655 5 56% 26,126 30'% 20'% 40% 25'% 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 152,460 70'% 106,722 60'% 91,476 SS% 77,755 S 56% 43,543 30%. 20% aQ'% 251%. 34 N'ailglo Lodge 27,977 70'% 19,584 70'% 19,584 85"/« 16,646 5 56% 9.322 30'% 20% 40'%, 251% 35 Vantage Point (1972) 68,520 70"/» 47,964 60'% 41,112 85'% 34,945 5 56 % 19,569 30 % 20 1% 40'% 25 % 36 Weshvind (1969) 36,988 70 % 25,892 70 % 23.892 85 % 22,008 5 56%. 12,324 30 % 20 / 40 % 25 / Subtotals 772,814 540,970 495,718 Grand Totals 1,376,286 963,500 881,309 Scenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards . Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ G ~ ~C 7 N d ~ y R " y ~ CQ tA f~l .N.. > Y Y d W ~ ~ A y V ~ Y Y ~ m Q A C ` • (n d ~ L G' Q W {i ~ 0 L u y u pyi _ E E J F E E 4; ~ J a o q ° d ~ a a ~ o ~ G C e Y Building Name (a.k.a.) 3 Z a Q ~ Z d Q ° Q o < New Develooment I NOrth D8y LO[ 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 2 West Day Lot 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,6002.0 2.0 4 375 2 3 VA Service Yard 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 J Face of Parking Structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 s[nfill at East Bus Drop-off 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Redevelooment of existine arooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,500 2.0 2.0 a 375 z s Vail Associates Core Site 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2,0 4 375 2 9 Landmark Townhomes 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 10 Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 1 t Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 iz Lionspride and parking structure t,wo 2.0 2.0 a 1,500 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 Subtotals Additional Densitv Added.. 1 4 Antlers (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 ts Lifthouse Lodce 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 16 Marriott M1tountain Resort (1979) 1,600 2.0 2,0 J 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Ground Level Retail Exoansion ' 1 8 Town of Vail Park Parcel 1,500 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z tv Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 " a 375 z Subtotals Grand Total, Potential Scenarios linlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 23 Lionshead lnn (Lostello) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 24 Landmark Tower 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 25 Vail 21 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 25 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 za Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) I,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 r 375 2 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 z 30 J[ontaneros (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 31 Treetops (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 32 Yail International (1975) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 33 Vuil Spa Condominiums (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 34 N'ailglo Lodge 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 35 N'antage Point (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 36 Westwind (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Grand Totals Scenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards o ~ Dwelting Unit product on ~ 19~ ~ new development ` ~ R o L ` O ~ O C ~ R W ~ O V e ° C N d C Vi R u ~ ta v 7 ° ~ _ 'e •c ~ . m p - = CG ~ ~ w u y c° c ~ ~ 'e ri ~ ~ OL ~ o e ~ e o o n 7 d L ~ ~ 3 p ~ C m m Y u L i `w a `n `w `w `L h ° ~ C . ~ 0 a C j VI (n Vi ~ ~ _ _ m m ~ ~,C e o o C ~ o ; s w o C 4e Building Name (a.k.a.) M1ew Develonment i NorthDayLot 20% O'i 80% looi 63,137 100/ Oi 0% 67,299 14,514 21.57% z NestDayLot 20% 0% 80% 700% 230,946 100"/» 0% 0% 244,719 60,491 24,72% 3 VA Service Yard 501% 0% 50% 100% 212,124 100% 01% 01% 246,857 59,978 .4.30'%. J FeceofParkingStructure 100'% 0'% 0% 100/ 31,588 1001%. 0'/. 0/ 41,209 9,821 23.53% s Infill at East Bus Drop-off 1001% 0% 0% 100% 12,923 100% 01% 0% 17,984 3,243 23.59'% Subtotals 550,717 618,067 Redeveloament of existine aroaerties 7ConcertHallPlaza 100'/ 0% 0% 100% 18,728 100% OG 0% 26,06: 6,149 23.59% 8 Vail Associates Core Site 100/ 0% 0% 100% 151,519 20G. 30/ 50% 214,810 6I,90: 28.8:i. v Landmark Townhomes 0% 0'% 100 % 100 % 77,977 100 % 01% 0'% 77,977 19,494 :5.00'%. lo Lazier Arcade 100 % 0% 0% 100 % 27,190 100 % 0'% 0'%. 39,358 9,23I 23.45% u Lion Square Nrth Phase 4 (1972) oi o'/ too% loo/ 107,902 too/ o/, o/ 107,902 26,976 25.00/ 12 Lionspride and parking structure 601i, o% aoi6 100i 46,556 1 oo-i o-i. o% 56,014 13,531 2e.1ei Subtotals 429,872 522,124 Additional Densitv Added.. 14Anders(1972) o% o"/0 100'% 100% 41,577 too% 0'% o'% 41.577 10,394 25.00'% ts Lifthouse Lodge 0%. 0'% 0% 100 % 16,971 100'%, 0'%, 0% 32,081 4,243 13 .23 % 16 Ntarriott Mountain Resort (1979) 0% 0% 100 % 100 % 94,426 100 % 01% 0% 94,426 23,607 25.00 % Subtotals 152,975 168,085 Ground Level Retail Exoansion 18 Town of Vail ParkParcel 100% 0% 0% 100% - 501%, So% 0% 3,312 662 20.00/ 19 LazierArcade 1001%, 0% 0% 100% - SOU 50% 0% 7,603 1,521 20.00% Subtotals . 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 1,133,565 1,319,190 ['nlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzi9nCondominiums(19'73) 0/ O.Y. 100'/ 100% 33,442 1001% 0% 0'%. 33,442 8,360 25.00% 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 0'% 0'% 100'%, 100% 97,429 100% 0'% 0'/ 97,429 24}57 25.00% 24 Landmark Tower So % 0% 50 % 100 / 56,127 100 / o% o% 65,208 15,863 2433 % 25 Vail 21 100'%. 0'% 0'% 100'% 29.499 100'% 0'% 0'% 40,371 9.549 23.65'% 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 01/1, o% 100i too/ 203,822 too/ o-z, o/ 203.822 50,956 25.00i 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 1001i, o/ o/, loo% 76.361 loo/ oIi. o/ 104,505 24,719 23.65% 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 0'% 0% 100'% 100 % 132,849 100 % 0% 0% 132,849 33,212 25.00 % 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) o % o u 100i 100i 95,321 loo / oIi, o/ 95,321 23.930 25.00 / 30 illontaneros(1972) 30 i, o'i, 70i, toor I07,153 too-z, o-i, oi, 11e,571 28,672 24.50i 31 Treetops(1972) 50% 0% 50% 100% 74,591 1001% 0'% 0'%. 86,198 20,969 2433% 32 VAil International(1975) oli, o/ 1 001i, too/ 203,801 tooI/, o-i o-i 203,801 50.950 25.00i 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) AO'% 0'% 60% 100% 305,078 100'% 0% 0'% 339,669 83.088 24.461/6 34 VeilgloLodge 0'% 0% 100'% 100'%. 72.719 100% 01% 0% 72,719 I8.180 25.00% 35 N'antage Point (1972) 0% 0% 100% 100'%. 152,657 1 0(1'%. 0% 0% 152,657 38,164 25.00% 36 NNestwind(1969) 0/ 0"/. 100% 100% 96,141 100% 0% 0'% 96,141 24,035 25.00% Subtotals 1,735,289 1,840,702 Grand Totals 2,868,854 39159,892 Scenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ ~ k. ~ zo: Zli t: ~ c V ~ Z U` :i 2 . a ec .lj ,.~Building Name (a.k.a.) ~ lYew Development t North Day Lot 4,161 624 3,537 63,137 63,137Z2 13,890 49,247 - - - 2 West Day Lot 13,773 2,755 11,018 230,946 230,946 57.736 173,209 - - - 3 VA Service Yard 34,733 6,947 27,787 212,124 212,124 53.031 159,093 - - - 4 Face Of Parking Strocture 9,621 1,924 7,697 31.588 31,588 7,897 23,691 - - - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,061 1,012 4,049 12,923 12,923 3231 9,692 - - - Subtotals 54,088 Redeveloament of existine prooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 7,334 1,467 5,867 18,72e 18,727.97 4,682 14,046 - - - 8 Vail Associates Core Site 63,291 12,658 50,633 151,519 30,304 7,576 22,728 45,456 11,364 31,092 9 Landmark Townhomes _ _ _ 77,977 77,977 19,494 58,483 - - - to LazierArcade 12,169 2,434 9,735 27,190 27,190 6,797 20,392 - - - t t Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) _ - - 107,902 107,902 25,976 80,927 - - - 12Lionspride and parking structure 9,458 1,892 7,566 46,556 46,556 11.639 34,917 - - - Subtotals 73,801 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Anders (1972) - - - 41.577 41.577.12 10.394 31.183 - - - ts Lifthouse Lodge 16,971 16,971 4Z43 12,728 - - - 16 Nlarriott M1tountain Resort (1979) 94,425 94,426 23,607 70,820 - - - Subtotals _ Ground Level Retail Exnansion ts Town of Vail Park Parcel 3~tz 662 2,650 ~9 LazierArcade 7,603 1.521 6,083 Subtotals 8,732 Grand Total, Potentiai Scenarios 136,621 Unlikel Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) - 33,442 33,441.82 8.360 25,081 - - - 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) _ _ _ 97,429 97,429 24.357 73,072 - - - 24 LandmarkTower 8,781 1,756 7,024 56,427 56,427 14,107 42,320 - - - 25 Vai121 10,872 2.174 8.698 29,499 29,499 7,375 22.124 - - - 26 Lion Square Lodee Phases 1-3 - - - 203,822 203,822 50,956 152,867 - - - 27 Lionshead Center(1969) 28,144 5,629 22,515 76,361 76,361 19,090 57,271 - - - za Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) _ - - 132,849 132,849 33212 99,636 - - - zv Lodge at Liooshead Phase 3(1976) _ _ _ 95,321 95,321 23.830 71,490 - - - 30 Montaneros (1972) 9,418 1,884 7,534 107,153 107,153 26,798 80,364 - - - sl Treetops (1972) 11,607 2,321 9,286 74,591 74,591 18.648 55,943 - - - 32 Vail International (1975) . - - 203,801 201,801 50,950 152,551 - - - 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 36,590 7,318 29,272 303,078 303,078 75,770 227,309 - - - 34Vailglo Lodge - - - 72,719 72.719 18.160 54,539 - - - 35 ~'antage Point (1972) 152,657 152,657 38,164 114,493 - - - 36 W¢StWlnd (1969) 96,141 96,I4I 24,035 72,106 - - - Subtotals 84,330 Grand Totals 220,951 5cenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards ~ Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ a ~ c d m y C`. .y ~ ~ a a a C E ~ W n y ~ ti . . ~ ~ Z z x e = . F v 2 ~ a ~ y a ~ ~ • ~ C: f: E: a~ c o` ~ c o c G F F F F E E Building Name (a.k.a.) V New Develooment 1 North Day Lot 67,299 31 123 - - - - 2 West Day Lot - - - 244.719 los 433 - - - - 3 VA SCrvicC Yard 246,857 99 398 - - - - a Face of Parking Structure 41,209 ts sv - - - - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 17,984 6 za - - - - Subtotals _ 259 1,037 - - - - Rederelooment of existing arooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza . _ _ 26,062 s 35 - - - - s 'v'ail Associates Core Site 75,760 30,304 45,456 214,810 14 57 21 85 121 242 9 LandmarkTownhomes _ _ _ 77,977 37 116 - - - - to LazierArcade 39,358 13 51 - - - - u Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 107,902 51 202 - - - - 12 Lionspride and parking structure 56,014 22 87 - - - - Subtotals 75,760 145 579 21 85 121 242 Additional Densitv Added.. ia Antlers (1972) - - - 41,577 19 78 - - - - t5 Lifthouse Lodge 16,971 8 32 - - - - 16 y[arriott Dtountain Resort(1979) qa,;Zb 44 177 Subtotals _ 72 287 Ground Level Retail Exoansion , ~8 Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,312 ~y LazicrArcade 7,603 Subtotals Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 75,760 476 1,903 21 85 121 242 llnlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) 33,442 1e 63 - - - - 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 97,429 46 183 - - - - 24 Landmark Tower 65.208 26 toc - - - - 25 Vail21 - - - 40,371 la Ss - - - - 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 203,822 96 382 - - - - 21 Lionshead Center(1969) 104,505 36 143 - - - - zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - - - 132,e49 62 249 - - - - zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - - - 95,321 as 179 - - - - 30 ,N(ontaneros(1972) I16,571 So 201 - - - - 31 Treetops(1972) 86,198 35 140 - - - - 32 N'ail International (1975) 203,801 96 382 - - - - 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 339,669 142 56e - - - - 34 Vailglo Lodge 72,719 34 136 - - - - 35 4'antage Point (1972) 152,657 72 286 - - - - 36 Westwind (1969) 96,141 45 160 - - - - Subtotals _ 813 3,254 - - - - Grand Totals 75,760 1,289 5,157 21 85 121 242 Scenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards _ Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ 0 i ~ u = c ~ 4+ 'i ~ T d O ~ d E $ ` ~ Gi ~ -`y C t e y i w Y 6 ^ G d G V C ' ~ _ _ E C 9 u C, y ~ e v ~ . 47 ~ ~ ` u Y ~ L V L ~ 01 v a y d V y ~ ~ w F u ~ i ~ d C m ~ m `c o d 4~I ` y U ~ E ` E G^ 6 ~ i ,c Z , E U 2 - ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) ~ a < Q ~ tiew Develooment i lorth Day Lot 5.5 19 0.4 tz 0.4 - 0.75 - 32 0.76 24 2 West Day Lot 5.5 61 0.4 43 0.4 - 0.75 - 104 1 79 3 VA S¢rviCC 1''9Pd 5.5 153 0.3 40 0.4 - 0.75 - 193 1 146 a Face of Parking Structure 5.5 42 0.4 6 0.4 - 0.75 - 48 1 37 s Infill at East Bus Drop-off Ss 22 0.4 2 0.4 - 0.75 - 25 i tv Subtotals 297 IOJ - - 401 Redevelooment of existina proaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 5.5 32 0.4 a 0.4 - 0.75 - 36 l 27 8 Vail AssociNtes Core Site 5.5 278 0.4 6 0.4 9 0.75 91 384 t 292 v Landmark Townhomes s.s - 0.4 15 0.4 - 0.75 - 15 1 11 lo Lazier Arcade 5.5 SJ 0.4 5 0.4 - 0.75 - 59 1 45 i i Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) s.s - 0.4 zo 0.4 - oas - zo t ts 12 Lionspride and parking structure s.s 42 0.4 9 0.4 - 0.75 - So t 38 Subtotals 406 58 9 91 563 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 6 0.4 - 0.75 - 8 1 6 15 Lifthouse Lodge 5.5 - 0.4 3 0.4 - 0.75 - 3 1 2 16 Vlarriott Mountain Resort (1979) s.s - 0.4 18 0.4 - 0.75 - ls 1 13 Subtotals - 29 - - 29 Ground Level Retail E'xoansion ta Town of Vail Park Parcel 5.5 15 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - 15 t tt 19 Lazier Arcade 5.5 33 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - 33 1 25 Subtotals 48 - - - 48 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 751 190 9 91 1,041 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) 5.5 - 0.4 6 0.4 - OJS - 6 i 5 zs Lionshead Inn (Lostello) s.s - 0.4 18 0.4 - 0.75 - 18 1 14 za LandmarkTower 5.5 39 0.4 it 0.4 - OJS - 49 1 37 25 Vai121 5.5 48 0.4 6 0.4 - 0.75 - 53 1 41 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 5.5 - 0.4 38 0.4 - 0.75 - 38 i 29 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 5.5 124 o..t ta 0.4 - 0.75 - 138 t 105 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 5.5 - 0.4 25 0.4 - 0.75 - 25 t 19 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 5.5 - 0.4 I8 0.4 - 0.75 - 18 t 14 30 '*(ontaneros (1972) 5.5 41 0.4 20 0.4 - 0.75 - 62 1 47 31 Treetops (1972) 5.5 SI 0.4 14 0.4 - OJS - 65 1 49 32 Vail International (1975) 5.5 - 0.4 38 0.4 - 0.75 - 38 1 29 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 5.5 161 OA 57 0.4 - 0.75 - 218 1 166 34 Vailglo Lodge 5.5 • 0.4 u 0.4 - 0.75 - 14 1 to as Vantage Point (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 zv 0.4 - 0.75 - 29 t zz 36 Westwind (1969) 5.5 - oA 18 0.4 - 0.75 - is 1 14 Subtotals 464 325 - - 789 Grand Totals 1,215 516 9 91 1,830 Scenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on a new devetopment ~ ~ C O O ~ ~ V a ~ w R ~ < 4 y p s C!. v a C ax, ?Y ,d = ~ Z V V y ~ [ ~ • a U a` y ` ' O • c c G O C Q [ ~ C a C ~ C ` E G [ ~ ~ Q ~ 4 ai ~ _ •d ` O Building Name (a.k.a.) a a a c a New Develooment I North D8y Lot 150 101 3,116 253.13 0 138 0 3,116 30'% 75'%, 65% 2West Dey Lot 150 101 10,961 253.13 0 138 0 10,961 30% 75 / 65 % 3 VA Service Yard 150 lOl 10,068 253.13 0 138 0 10,068 30'%. 75 % 65 % s Face of Parking Structure 150 101 1,199 253.13 0 138 0 1,499 30'% 751% 65'% 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 150 101 613 253.13 0 138 0 613 30% 75%. 65% Subtotals 26,257 0 0 26,257 Redevelooment of existine prooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 150 101 889 253 0 138 0 889 30 % 75 / 65 % s Vail Associates Core Site 150 101 1,438 253 5393 138 16,773 23,605 30'% 75 % 65 % 9 LandmarkTownhomes 150 .101 3,701 253 0 138 0 3,701 30'%. 75% 65% 10 LazierArcade 150 101 1,290 253 0 138 0 1,290 301%. 75%, 65% It Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) tso tol 5,121 253 0 138 o 5.121 30'% 75'% 65"/. - 12 Lionspride and parking structure tso 101 2,210 253 0 138 0 2,210 30/ 75'% 65/ Subtotals 14,649 5,393 16,773 36,816 Additional Densitv Added.. u Antlers(1972) 150 101 1,973 253 0 138 0 1,973 30'% 75% 65% • ts LifthouseLodge 150 101 805 253 0 138 0 805 30'% 75'% 65% 16 Nlarriott Mountain Resort (1979) 150 101 4,452 253 0 138 0 4,482 30'% 75%. 65"/« Subtotals 7,260 0 0 7,260 Ground Level Retail Exoansion 18 Town of Vail Park Parcel 150 tot o 253 0 138 0 0 3o~i, 7S~i~ 65 iI 9 LazierArcade tso 101 o 253 o 138 0 0 3o~i. 751i, 65% Subtotals 0 0 0 0 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 48,167 5,393 16,773 70,333 tinlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 150 101 1,587 253 0 138 0 1,587 30% 75% 65% 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 150 101 4,624 253 0 138 0 4,624 30% 75'% 65% 24 Landmark Tower I50 101 2,678 253 0 138 0 2,678 30 % 75 % 65 % 25 Vail 21 150 101 1,400 253 0 138 0 1,400 30'% 75'% 65 / 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 150 101 9,674 253 0 138 0 9,674 301% 75'% 65% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 150 101 3,624 253 0 138 0 3,624 30'% 75'% 65% zs Lodge at Lionshcad Phase 1& 2(1970) tso 101 6,305 253 0 138 0 6,305 301i, 751i. 65/ 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) tso tot 4,524 253 o 138 o 4,524 301% 75% 65/ 30 Montaneros(1972) 150 101 5,086 233 0 138 0 5,086 30'% 75'% 65% 31 Trectops(1972) 150 101 3,540 253 0 138 0 3,540 30'% 75% 65%. az Vail [nternational (1975) 150 101 9,673 253 0 138 0 9,673 30'% 75'% 65% 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 150 101 IaJSJ 253 0 138 0 14.384 30'% 75% 65 % 34 VailgloLodge 150 101 3,451 253 0 138 0 3,451 30'% 75% 65% 35 VantagePoint(1972) 150 101 7,245 253 0 138 0 7,245 301%, 75/ 65% 36 Westwind (1969) 150 101 4,563 253 0 138 0 4,563 30% 75%. 65% Subtotals 82,358 0 0 82,358 Grand Totals 130,525 5,393 16,773 152,692 Scenario B-2. Five story building, weighted towards _ Dwelling Unit product on new development y V `a ~ a a ~ ~ ~ . ~ `1 ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ C d . •G ' ~ C 4 ~ ~ Q C~ _ C: ~ ~ ~ e °i e z e , e "R i, S = c ~ C n C ~ C = Oi U 4 C ~ Q ~ c• Building Name (a.k.a.) New Develooment 1 Yorth Day Lot 3,537 31 37 - - - - 37 3,116 24 23 zWest Day Lot 11,018 108 130 - - - - 130 10,961 79 41 3 VA Service Yard 27,787 99 119 - - - - 119 10,068 196 37 a Face of Parking Structure 7,697 IS 18 - - - - IS 1,499 37 60 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 4,049 6 7 - - - 7 613 19 47 Subtotals 54,088 259 311 - - - - 311 26,2-57 305 37 Redevelooment of existina properties 7 Concert HaU Plaza 5,867 9 11 - - - - tl 889 27 34 s Yail Associates Core Site 50,633 la 17 21 64 121 158 239 23,605 292 6 9 Landmark Townhomes _ 37 44 - - - - 43 3,701 11 53 to Lazier Arcade 9,735 13 IS - - - - IS 1,290 45 39 i t Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) - 51 61 - - - - 61 S,ul 15 53 tz Lionspride and parking structure 7,566 22 26 - - - - 26 2,210 38 42 Subtotals 73,801 145 174 21 64 121 158 39i 36,816 428 29 Additional Densitv Added.. la .4ntlcrs (1972) ~ 19 23 - - - - 23 1,973 6 65 15 Lifthouse Lodge - s 10 - - - - to eos 2 zz 16 Marriott Ntountain Resort (1979) - 41 53 - - - - 53 4,382 13 49 Subtotals _ 72 86 - - - - 86 7,260 22 46 Ground Level Retail Exoansion ~a Town of Vaii Park Parcel 2,650 11 - I9 Lazier Arcade 6,083 - - - - - - - - 25 - Subtotals 8,732 - - - - - - - - 37 - Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 476 571 21 64 121 158 792 70,333 791 37 L'nlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) - 16 19 - - - - 19 1,587 5 53 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) - 46 55 - - - - 55 4,624 la 49 24 LandmBrk Tower 7,024 26 32 - - - - 32 2,678 37 33 25 Vail21 8,698 H 17 - - - - 17 1.400 41 39 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - 96 lls - - - - 115 9,674 29 53 21 Lionshead Center(1969) 22,515 36 43 - - - - 43 3,624 105 39 28 Lodge at Lionshead P6ase 1& 2(1970) - 62 75 - - - - 75 6.305 Iv as 29 Lodee at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - 45 Sa - - - Sa 4,524 la 45 30 y(ontaneros(1972) 7,534 50 60 - - - - 60 5,086 47 49 31 Tr¢¢tOpS (1972) 9,286 35 42 - - - - 42 3,540 49 39 32 Vall IntCrnatlOOel (197$) - 96 115 - - - - 115 9,673 29 53 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 29,272 142 170 170 14,384 166 41 34 Vailglo Lodge . 34 41 ai 3.451 10 53 33 Vantage Point (1972) - 72 86 - - - - 86 7,245 22 45 36 Westwind (1969) . 45 54 - - - - 54 4,563 la 53 Subtotals 54,330 813 976 - - - - 976 82,358 600 46 Grand Totals 220,951 1,289 1,547 21 64 121 158 1.768 152,692 1,391 41 SCENARIO C-1 Six stories, weighted towards fractional fee unit development 12 Scenario C-1. Six story building, weighted towards . Fractional Fee product on new development d ~ m CQ a m •i v C w e q 9 d ~ 9 a e ` e b0 • w ~ ~ °1 y m 'O ^ ~ ~ ~ c L~; C v~i d t.; eo a ti ° E v,' C7 ~ V ° ~ ~ c E c ~ tL4i.', u ? p ~ ° e ~ G E u . ` • ~ u ~j e C _ ~ ~`3m C C, y Q " .m. a ° ~ ~ a e ' ° o E m e C w j ~ ~ ~ ~ w ? o V u O fi O ~ ~ Q V m _ Building Name (a.k.a.) a m' s V ~ N ~ z' ~ c z` a` c New Develooment 1 North Day Lot 59,449 701/6 41,615 35 % 20,807 70 % 14,565 6 56 % 8,156 30 % 15% 40 % 22 % 2 West Day Lot 114,775 70 / 80,343 60 % 68,865 80 % 55,092 6 36 / 30,852 30 % 20i JO 25 3 VAService Yard 115,778 70% 81,045 60% 69,467 ,80% 55,573 6 56% 31,121 30% 20% 40% 25'% a Face of Parking Structure 10,690 70% 7,483 90 % 9,621 90 % 8,659 6 56 % 4,849 20 % 20 % 40'% 25 L. 5 Inritl at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 70 % 3,936 90 % 5,061 80 % 4.049 6 56 % 2,267 30 % 20 9% 40'% 25 % Subtotals 306,315 214,421 173,821 Redevelooment of existina oroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 70% 7,898 65'% 7,334 80% 5,867 6 56'%, 3,286 30% 20'U 401% 25% s Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 70 % 68,160 65 % 63,291 75 % 47,468 6 56'% 26,582 30% 20 % JO % 25 % 9 Landmark Townhomes 30,000 70 % 21,000 70 % 21,000 85 % 17,850 6 56 % 9,996 30 % 20%. 40 % 25 % 10 Lazier Arcade 14,316 70 % 10,021 85 % 12,169 70'% 8,518 6 56'% 4,770 30 % 20 % 40 % 25 % I 1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 70 % 29,059 70 % 29,059 95 % 24.700 6 56 % 13,832 30 % 20 % 40 % 25 % 12 Lionspride and parking structure 22,518 70/ 15,763 70% 15,763 80% 12,610 6 56% 7,062 30/ 20% 40G. 25% Subtotals 217,001 151,901 148,615 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 13,000 70 % 9,100 90 % 11,700 80 % 9,360 6 56'% 5,24: 30 % ZO % 40 % 25 % 15 LiRhouseLodge 15,905 701%. 11,134 95'% 159110 90% 13,599 2 56'% 7,615 20% 20% 40'%. 25% 16 Alarriott blountain Resort (1979) 39,123 70'% 27}86 65'% 25,430 85'% 21,615 6 56'% 12,105 30'% 20'% 40'% 251/6 Subtotals 68,028 47,620 52,240 Groued Level Retail Eroansion is Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 7o~i 2,576 vo1i, 3,312 oi o 1 oIi o or zor ao~i, 25i, 19 LazierArcade 8,448 70i 5,914 90% 7,eo3 oi o t oIi o or 201i ao% 25% Subtotals 12,128 89490 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 603,472 422,430 385,591 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) 12,866 70i 9,006 70% 9,006 Ssi 7,655 6 55-i, 4,287 30i, zo%, 40r zsr 23 Lionshead [nn (Lostello) 40,367 70 % 28,257 65 % 26,239 85 % 22,303 6 56'% 12,490 30 % 201/6 40'% 25'% 24 LandmarkTower 35,122 70% 24,585 50% 17,561 85% 14.927 6 56% 8,359 30% 20/ 40% 25'%. 25 Vail 21 15,532 70 % 10,872 70 % 10,872 SS % 9,242 6 56 / 5,175 30 / 20 / 40i 25 i, 26LionSquareLodgePhases1-3 78,416 70% 54,891 70% 54,891 SS% 46,658 6 56%. 26,128 30% 20%. 40/ 25% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 40,206 70% 28,144 70% 28,144 85% 23,923 6 56% 13,397 30% 20/ 40% 25% zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 59,629 70i 41,740 60% 35,777 ss^r« 30,411 6 56% 17.030 30'i zo-i. 40r 25 i 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 42,785 70 % 29,949 60 / 25,671 85 % 21,820 6 56 % 12,219 30 / 20 % 40 / 25 % 30 iNlontaneros(1972) 44,848 701% 31,394 70% 31,394 85"/. 26,685 6 56'% 14,943 30% 20'% 40'% 25% 31 Treetops (1972) 38,690 70 % 27,083 60% 23,214 85 % 19,732 6 56% 11,050 30 % 20% 40 / 25 % 32 Vail International (1975) 78,408 70% 54,886 70% 54,886 85% 46,653 6 56"/« 26,126 30% 20/ 40% 25% 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 152,460 70'% 106,722 60% 91,476 85% 77,755 6 56'% 43,543 30'%. 20'% 40% 25% 34 ailglo Lodge 27,977 70 % 19,584 70 % 19,584 SS'% 16,646 6 56'% 9,322 30 % 20'% AO'% 25 % 35 Vantage Point (1972) 68,520 70 % 47,964 60 % 41,112 85 % 34,945 6 56 % 19,569 30 % 20'%. 40 % 25 % 36 Westwind (1969) 36,988 70/ 25,892 70 % 25,892 85 % 22,008 6 561% 12,324 30 % 20"/« SO % 25 % Subtotals 772,814 540,970 495,718 Grand Totals 1,376,286 963,400 881,309 Scenario C-1. Six story , building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development ~ a ~ 'e 0 u ~a = L. W6- N {i ~O v Vl "s > Y Y ~ = d y VI N y CC p~p > pp C R ~ A C p ~ . ~ a c E ' o E E E ~ 4 E E C . . 4: ~ .y O a d e ~ Y W Y C a 6 C o ~ ~ C O Y Building Name (a.k.a.) T ' ° Q e ; z a e 6 z A. c a New Develooment 1 North Da}' LO[ 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 z W'est Day Lot 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 3 VA Service Yard 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 4 Face of Parking Structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 9 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Redevelooment of existine oroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z 8 Vail Associates Core Site 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 9 LandmarkTownhomes 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 10 Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 1 t Lion Square Yrth Phase 4(1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 12 Lionspride and parking structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 is Lifthouse Lodge 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z 16 Marriott D[ountain Resort (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 S u btota Is Ground Level Retail Exnansion Is Town of Vail Park Parcel I,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 19 Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 Subtotals Grand Total, Potential Scenarios Unlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Candominiums (1973) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 r 375 i 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 za LandmarkTower 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z 25 Vail21 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 z 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase I& 2(1970) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 z:o 4 375 2 30 NIontaneros (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 31 Treetops (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 32 Vail International (1975) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 z 34 Vailglo Lodgf 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 35 Vantage Point (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 36 Westwind (1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 Subtotals Grand Totals Scenario C-1. Six story building, weighted towards o , Fractional Fee product on d new development ~ O u o g c c ~ y 9 ~ a o tr, ~ A y ~ v Q 7 ~ •R w ~ ~ e " a u ~ o `e q ~ d e V~i C C C C 4. ~ ~ ~ = q 9 'C ~ 7 4oi C C O C O ~ o ~ = - . . ~ ea 9 t U ; a y, ` : . ~ O `e > > y G ~ G CL G M ~ Y b N L ~ ` . 4 ~ ` ~ 0 U VGJ V VJ ~ it = Z OE m Y V.C C C C C ~ _ + p e e W O~ L ~'t > > > ? • ~y`` ~ x Building Name (a.k.a.) NCW DCVCIODrtICO! 1\orth Day l.ot 20 % 0% 80 % 100 % 73,333 0% 100 % 0% 77,J9J 16.757 21.62'% zWest Day Lot 20 % 0% 80 % 100 % 269,510 0% 100'% 0% 283,283 70,132 21.76 % 3 VA Service Yard 50 % 0% 50 % 100 % 251,025 0% 100% 0% 285,759 69,70.3 2139%, 4 Face of Parking Structure 100% 0% 0% 100'% 38,515 0% 100% 0% 48.136 11,553 24.00%, 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 100/ p^/„ o/ 100/ 15,757 0% loo'% o/ 20,818 4,951 23,78/4 Subtotals 648,140 715,489 Redevelopment of existin¢ pronerties • 7 Concert Hall Plaza ]00'% 0% 0% 100% 22,835 0% 100'% 0'% 30,169 7,176 :3.78'% s Vail Associates Core Site 100% 0% 0% 100"/. 184,747 20'% 30% 50'% 248,038 72,701 29.31'% v LandmarkTownhomes 0% 0% 100% 100% 90,472 0% 100'% 0'% 90,472 22,618 25.0f lo LazierArcade 100% 0% 0'/ 100'% 33,152 0'%. 1001A 0%" 45.321 10,722 :3.66 i 1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) o'/ o% loo/ loo'/ 125,192 o-i t0o'/ o/ 125,192 31,298 25.00-z, 12 Lionspride and parking structure 60/ o'/ 40/ 100'%, 55'M 0% t00% o/ 64,841 15,737 24.27G, Subtotals 511,782 604,033 Additional Densitv Added.. u Antlers(19'72) or oli, tooli looIi 48,129 100% o.i, oi 48.129 12.032 zs.oo'i. IS Lifthouse Lodge 0% 0% 0/ 100 % 16,971 100 / 0 U 0% 32,081 4,243 I1.23-i, 16 ;lfarriott Nlountain Resort(1979) oG, o% Ioo/ 1 oo/ 109,557 too% o% o% I09,557 27389 25.00'i, Subtotals 174,658 189,767 Ground Level Ret9il Exoansion 18 Town of Vail Park Parcel 1001i, oIi o% IooIi 501i, soli. o% 3,312 662 20.00% t9 LazierArcade ]00% 00/1, 0% 100'% - SO% SO% 0% 7,60.3 1.5:1 20.00% Subtotals _ 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 1,334,580 1,520,205 l nlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 EnzianCondominiums(1973) o% o% 100% 100% 38,801 100'/ o%, o'/ 38,801 9,700 25.00-i, 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 0% 0% ]00 100 % 113,041 100 % 0% 0% 113,041 28,260 25.00 / za LandmarkTower 50% 0% SO% 100'% 66,876 100% 0'% 0'% 75,656 18,475 24.42'% 25 Vail21 100% 0'% 0'% 100'% 35,968 100'% 0'% 0'% 46,840 11,166 23.8J% 25 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 o% oi 100/ too1i, 236,482 too'/ o/ o'/l 236,482 59,121 25.00-i. n Lionshead Center(1969) 100% 0% 0'% 100'% 93,107 100'% 0'%. OGU 121,251 28.906 21.84'% 28 LOdge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 0'% 0'% 100% 100% 154,136 ]O(1%6 0'% 0'% 154,136 38,534 25.00'% zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3 (1976) 01i, OIi too^/, 100i 110,595 too/ o/, o/ 110,595 27.649 25.001i, 30 Jlontaneros(1972) 30i oi 70i looIi 125,832 too-i oli, o/ 135,250 33,342 24.65-i 31 Treetops(1972) so% o'i so% iooIi as,aa 1 oo^r. oIi o% ?oo,ou zi,nz 24.42% 3z Vail International (1975) o"A o% loa/ 100% 236,458 too-/ oIi. o/ 236,458 59,115 25.00'i, 33 VailSpaCondominiums(1979) 40% 0'% 60% 100% 357,507 100% 0'% 0% 39J,097 96,695 2J.3J% 34 Yailglo Lodge o/ oi toa"/» too/ 84,371 too/ o'i, oIi. 84,371 21.093 zs.oo/ 35 Vantage Point (1972) o/ o% 100/ 100% 177,I19 100'/ o%, o% 177,119 44,280 25.01" yb 1VesM ind (1969) % 0% 100 % 100 % 111,546 1001/6 0% 111,546 27,887 25.0. Subtotals 2,030,241 2,135,654 Grand Totals 3,364,821 3,655,859 Scenario C-1. Six story , building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development ~ ~ ~ • c = 2 = ~ i ~ _ d t~ U I` c o ~ ~ C`: U` 2 ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) New Develooment 1\orth Day Lot 4,161 624 3,537 73,333 - - - 73}33 16,133 57,200 2 W'¢SI Day LOt 13,773 2,755 11,018 269,510 - - - 269,510 67,378 202,133 3 VA Service Yard 31,733 6,947 27,787 251,025 - - - 251,025 62,756 188,269 4 Face of Parking Structure 9,621 1,924 7,697 38515 - - - 38,515 9,629 28,886 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,061 1,012 4,049 15,757 - - - 15,747 3,939 11,818 Subrotals 54,088 Redevelooment of existina aronerties 7 Concert Hall PI8Z8 7}34 1,467 5,867 22,835 - - - 22,835 5.709 17,126 s Vail Associates Core Site 63,291 12,658 50,633 184,747 36,949 9,237 27,712 55,124 13,856 41,568 v Landmark Townhomes - - - 90,472 - - - 90,472 22,618 67,854 to Lazier Arcade 12,169 2,334 9,735 33,152 - - - 33,132 8,288 24,864 L Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) - - - 125,192 - - - 125,192 31,298 93.894 12 Lionspride and parking structure 9,455 1,892 7,566 55J83 - - - 55,383 13,846 41,538 Subtotals 73,801 Additional Densitv Added.. IJ Antlers (1972) - - - 48,129 48.129.12 12.032 36.097 - - - 15 Lifthouse Lodge 16,971 15,971 4,243 12,728 - - - 16 Marriott Niountain Resort (1979) 109,557 109,557 27J89 82,168 - - Subtotals _ Ground Levcl Retail Ex4ansion IS Town of Vail park Parcel 3,312 662 2,650 - - - - - - - i9 Lazier Arcade 7,603 1,521 6,083 - - - - - - - Subtotals 8,732 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 l'nlikelv Redevelo menb zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) - - - 38,801 38,800.51 9,700 299100 - - - 23 Lionshead Inn (LOStetlo) _ 113,041 113,041 28,260 84,781 - - - za Landmark Tower 8,781 1,756 7,024 66,876 66,876 16,719 50,157 - - - 25 Vai121 10,872 2,174 8,698 35,968 35,968 8,992 26,976 - - - 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - _ _ 236,482 236,482 59,121 177,362 - - - 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 28,144 5,629 22,515 93,107 93,107 23,277 69,930 - - - zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - _ _ 154,136 154,136 38,534 115,602 - - - 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) _ _ _ 110,595 110,595 27,649 82,946 - - - 30 Nlontaneros (1972) 9,418 1,884 7,534 125,832 125,832 31,458 94,374 - - - 31 Treetops (1972) 11,607 2,321 9,286 88,401 88,404 22,101 66,303 - - - 32 V811 IIItCP08ti0na1 (1975) • _ _ 236,458 236,458 59.115 177,344 - - - 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 36,590 7,318 29,272 357,507 357,507 89377 268,130 - - - 34 N'ailglo LodeC - - ' 84.171 84,371 21.093 63,279 - - - 35 N"antage Point (1972) - - - 177.I19 177.119 44,280 132,839 36 NVestwind(1969) 111,546 111,546 27,887 83,660 - - - Subtotals 84,330 Grand Totals 220,951 J Scenario C-1. Six story building, weighted towards - Fractional Fee product on new development ~ ~ 4 d ~ j ~ j v o ~ a C ~ ' ~ ~ a ~ h o J ~ ~ Y ~ Z ^ c a ~ a ~ G t: 6: oe c .010 e c c c :r F F E F F E Building Name (a.k.a.) Q Q Q ; i z z i z z ~ M1ew Develooment I Yorth Day Lot 77,494 - - 35.75 143 - - z West Day Lot 293,283 126 505 - - 3 VA Service Yard 285,759 - - 118 471 - - a Face of Parking Structure 48,136 - - 18 n - - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 20,8I8 - - 7 30 - - Subtotals - - - 305 1,221 - - Redeveloament of existin¢ orooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza - - - 30,169 - - il 43 - - 8 Vail Associates Core Site 92}93 36,949 55,421 248,038 17 69 26 104 148 296 v LandmarkTownhomes - - y 90,472 - - 42 I70 - - to LazierArcade - - - 45.321 - - 16 62 - - tI Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 125,192 - - 59 235 - - tz Lionspride and parking structure _ 64,841 - - 26 104 - - Subtotals 92,373 17 69 179 717 148 296 Additional Densitv Added.. IJ Antlers (1972) - - - 48.129 23 90 - - - - 15 Lifthouse Lodge - - - 16,971 s 3: - - - - 16 `larriott Mountain Resort (1979) 109,557 51 205 - - - - Subtotals 82 327 Ground Level Retaii Exuansion ~ ts Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,312 19 Lazier Arcade 7,603 - - - - - Subtotals Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 92,373 99 397 484 1,938 148 296 L?nlikel Redevelo ment- Zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) - - - 38,801 is 73 - - - - 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 11I,041 53 212 21 LandmarkTower - - - 75,656 31 125 - - - - 25 Yail21 - - - 46.840 17 67 - - - - 26 Lion Squaretodge Phases 1-3 - - - 236,482 111 443 - - - - 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 121,251 44 175 - - - - zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - - - I54,136 72 zsv - - - - 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - - - 110,595 52 207 - - - - 30 Montaneros(1972) 135.250 59 236 - - - ~ 31 Treetops (1972) ioo,ou 41 166 - - - - 32 Vaillnternational(1975) 236,459 lu 443 - - - - 33 Yail Spa Condominiums (1979) - - - 394,097 168 670 - - - - 34 Vailglo Lodge 84,371 40 158 - - - - 35 Vantage Point (1972) 177,119 83 332 - - - - 36 Westwind (1969) - - - 111,546 52 209 - - - - Subtotals - 952 3,807 - - - - Grand Totals 92,373 1,051 4,203 484 1,938 148 296 L Scenario C-1. Six story . building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development ~ 0 d ~ ~ d o ~ 0 C g d :S~ r ~ Gr .7 i eG Q ~ ~ 0 01 y "a w `u ~ ~ : . m e ~ ' E C C Oyi V y 9 .OyiG G y . a ~ ~ ` C L ~C~. ` ~ 4 a0 U V (V~ V ~ y [y d y y. " E ` ° d _ e e y 4; ~ E d E C~` ~ e°i S S 2 Building Name (a.k.a.) Q= M1ew Develooment I \orth Day Lot 5.5 tv 0.4 - 0.4 14 oas - 34 0.76 26 2 West Day Lot 5.5 61 oA - oA 51 0.75 - 111 t 84 3 N'A Service Y'ard 5.5 153 0.4 - 0.4 47 0.75 - 200 1 152 J Face of Parking Structure 5.5 42 0.4 - oA 7 0.75 - So 1 38 5[nfiil at East Bus Drop-off 5.5 22 0.4 - 0.4 3 oas - 25 1 19 Subtotals 297 - 122 - 420 Redeveloament of existina oroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 5.5 32 0.4 - 0.4 4 0.75 - 37 I 28 sVail Associates Core Site 5.5 278 0.4 7 0.4 10 0.75 111 407 1 309 v LandmarkTownhomes 5.5 - 0.4 - oA U 0.75 - 17 1 13 io Lazier Arcade 5.5 54 0.4 - 0.4 6 0.75 - 60 t as 11 Lion Square lVrth Phase 4(1972) 5.5 - 0.4 - 0.4 23 0.75 - 23 1 ts 12Lionspride and parking structure s.s az 0.4 - 0.4 10 0.75 - 52 1 ao Subtotals 406 7 72 111 595 Additional Densitv Added.. 1 4 Antlers (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 9 0.4 - 0.75 - 9 1 7 15 LiRhouse Lodge s.s - 0.4 3 0.4 - 0.75 - 3 t z 16 Nlarriott Dlountain Resort (1979) oA 21 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 1 16 Subtotals _ 33 - - 33 Ground Level Retail Exnansion ~s Town of Vail Park Parcel 5.5 15 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - ts 1 u 19 Lazier Arcade 5.5 33 OA - 0.4 - OJS - 33 1 25 Subtotals qg _ qg Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 751 40 194 111 1,096 Uniikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) 5.5 - 0.4 7 0.4 - 0.75 - 7 t 6 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 5.5 - 0.4 21 0.4 - 0.73 - 21 1 16 24 LandmarkTower 5.5 39 0.4 13 OA - 0.75 - 51 1 39 zs Vai121 5.5 48 oA 7 0.4 - 0.75 - 55 t 41 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 5.5 - 0.4 44 0.4 - 0.75 - 44 1 34 27 Lionshead Center(1969) 5.5 tza 0.4 17 oA - 0.75 - trt t 107 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 5.5 - 0.4 29 0.4 - 0.75 - 29 t 22 :v Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 5.5 - 0.4 zt 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 i 16 30 N[ontaneros (1972) 5.5 41 0.4 za 0.4 - 0.75 - 65 I 49 31 Treetops (1972) ss sl 0.4 17 0.4 - 0.75 - 68 1 St 32 N'ail Internatiooal (1975) 5.5 - OA 44 OA - 0.75 - 43 1 34 33 1'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 5.5 161 0.4 67 0.4 - 0.75 - 228 I 173 34 Vailglo Lodge 5.5 - 0.4 16 0.4 - 0.75 - 16 l 12 35 N'antage Point (1972) 5.5 - OA 33 0.4 - 0.75 - 33 1 25 36 NN'estwind (1969) 2 - 0.4 21 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 1 16 Subtotals 1-7 464 381 - - 844 Grand Totals 1,215 420 194 111 1,940 Scenario C-1. Six story building, weighted towards • Frac#ional Fee product on c new development ~ r U, C O O • ~ 9 L C/~ Y U = ~ A M h a ~C' y z .7 m m C W ~ ~ D ~ ~ e O G O 4' e Q 5 y cz d a`~ _ a < z ~ ~ e Y ~ C s = C ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) \ew Develo2ment i North Day Lot 150 101 0 253.13 9,049 138 0 9,049 30 % 75 % 65 % zWest Day Lot 150 101 0 253.13 31,978 138 0 31,978 30 % 75 % 65 % 3 YA Service Yard 150 IOI 0 253.13 29,785 138 0 29,785 30% 75 % 65 % 4 Face Of Parking Structure 150 101 0 253.13 4,570 138 0 4,570 301/6 75/ 63% 5 Infi11 at East Bus Drop-off 150 101 0 253.13 1,870 138 0 1,870 300% 75 % 65 % Subtotais 0 77,251 0 77,251 Redevelooment of existin- aroperties 7 ConcCtt HBII Plaza 150 101 0 253 2,709 138 0 2,709 30'% 75 % 65 % sVail Associates Core Site 150 101 1,754 253 6576 138 20,451 28,781 30'% 751% 65 % 9 Landmark Townhomes 150 101 0 253 10,735 138 0 10,735 30 % 75 % 65 % ~ o Lazier Arcade 150 ] 01 B 253 3,931 138 0 3,934 30 % 75 % 65 % 1i Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) lso toi o zsa 14,854 138 o 14,854 30% 7 5 i, 65i I: Lionspride and parking structure 150 101 0 253 6,571 138 0 6,571 30% 75% 65% Subtotals 1,754 45,380 20,451 67,585 Additional Densitv Added.. u Antlers(1972) iso 101 2,284 253 o 138 o 2.284 301z, 75i, 65% .5 Lifthouse Lodge 150 101 805 253 0 138 0 SOS 30 % 75 % 65 % 16NIarriotthlountainResort(1979) 150 101 5,200 253 0 138 0 5,200 30% 75/ 65/ Subtotals 8,289 0 0 8,289 Ground Level Retail Exoansion 18'fown ot Vail Park Parcel 150 tot o 253 o 138 0 0 30i 75% 65% I 9 LazierArcade Iso lol 0 253 o 138 o 0 30/ 75i, 65% Subtotais 0 0 0 0 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 10,043 122,631 20 451 153,126 " linl+kelv Redevelo ment- .z Enzian Condominiums (1973) lso 101 1,842 253 0 138 o 1.842 30% 75% esi 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 150 ioi 5.365 253 0 138 o 5,365 My. 75% 65% 24 LatldmarkTower tso lol 3,174 253 0 138 0 3,174 30% 75% 65% 25 VNiI 21 150 101 1,707 253 0 138 0 1,707 30% 75'% 65 % 26 Liptt $quare Lodgc Phases 1-3 ISO tol 11,224 253 0 138 0 11,224 30 % 75 % 65 % 27 Lioasbead Center (1969) 150 101 4,419 253 0 138 0 4,419 30 1% 75 / 65 % zs Lodgeat Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 150 101 7,315 253 0 138 0 7,315 30% 75% 65% 29 LodgeatLionsheadPhase3(1976) 150 101 5,249 253 0 138 o 5,249 soi. 75i, 65% 30 blostAperos (1972) 150 101 5,972 253 0 138 0 5,972 30 / 75 % 65 % ar Treetaps (1972) 150 101 4,196 253 0 138 0 4,196 30% 75% 65•/. 32 Vyit International (1975) 150 101 11,223 253 0 138 0 11,223 30 % 75 / 65 % 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 150 101 16,968 253 0 138 0 16,968 30 % 75 "K 65 % 34 VaU& Lodge 150 101 4,00.1 253 0 138 0 4,004 30 % 75 % 65 % 35 VaatW Point (1972) 150 101 8,406 253 0 138 0 8,406 30'% 75 % 65 % 36 Wesbrind (1969) 150 IOI 5,294 253 0 138 0 5,294 30 % 75'% 65 % Subi4fais 96,357 0 0 96,357 Grawd Totals 106,400 122,631 20,451 249,483 Scenario C-l. Six story building, weighted towards Fractional Fee product on new development Y ~ > v 4 ~ 0~1 y ~ 7 aQ+ : ` `0 3 ~ ~ ~ d m 1 Y ~ C P ~ ~ y ~ - ¢ J ~ ~ 5 n 5 m ~ ~ e ~ m 4! _ cd ~ y e y ° y o e C ~ ~ 4~ ~ 47 Building Name (a.k.a Z tiew Develooment INorth Day Lot 3,537 36 107 - - 107 9,049 26 - 2 WeSt DeV LOt 11,018 - - 126 379 - - 379 31y78 84 - 3 VA Service Yard 27,787 118 353 - - 353 29,785 152 - a Face of Parking Structure 7,697 - - 18 54 - - 54 4,570 38 - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 4,049 7 ZZ 22 1,870 19 - Subtotals 54,088 - - 305 916 - - 916 77,251 319 - Redevelooment of exis~oerties 7 Concert Hail Plaza 5,867 11 32 - - 32 2,709 zs _ s Vail Associates Core Site 50,633 17 21 26 78 tas 192 291 28,781 309 a 9 Landmark Townhomes _ ;Z 127 _ _ 127 10,735 13 - lo Lazier:lrcade 9,735 - - 16 47 - - 47 3,934 45 - 11 Lion Square Yrth Phase 4(1972) _ 59 176 - - 176 14.854 IS - iz Lionspride and parkiog structure 7.366 26 78 78 6S71 ao - Subtotals 73,801 17 21 179 538 148 192 751 67,585 452 3 Additional Densitv Added.. 1 1Antlers (1972) - 23 27 - - - - 27 2184 7 76 i5 Lifthouse Lodge _ 8 to 10 805 Z ZZ 16 Ntarriott Mountain Resort (1979) - 51 62 - - - - 62 5S00 16 37 Subtotals _ 82 98 98 8.289 25 52 Ground Level Retail Exoansion ~ ts Town of Vail Park Parcel 2,650 ,9 Lazier Arcade, 6,093 zs Subtotals 8,732 - - - - - - - - 37 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136.621 99 119 484 1,453 148 192 1,765 153,126 833 19 Lnlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) _ 18 22 _ _ _ _ ZZ 1,942 6 bz 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) - 53 64 64 5,3e5 16 57 24 LandmarkTower 7,024 31 38 - - - - 38 3,174 39 39 25 Vail21 8.698 17 20 - - - - 20 1.707 JI 47 25 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - i>> 133 - - - - 133 11ZZ4 34 62 27 Lions6ead Center(1969) 22.515 aa 52 - - - - sz 4,419 107 47 zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) . 72 87 7.3 t 5 ZZ 53 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - Sz 62 - - - - 62 5.249 16 53 30 Montaneros(1972) 7,534 59 71 71 5,972 49 57 31 Treetops (1972) 9,286 41 50 - - - - SO 4,196 51 47 32 Veil Internetional (1975) - 111 133 - - - - 133 I1,223 34 62 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 29,272 168 201 - - - - 201 16y68 173 48 34 Vailglo Lodge - ao 47 - - - - 47 4,004 iz 52 35 V'antage Point(1972) _ 93 100 100 8,406 zs 53 36 Westwiod (1969) _ SZ 63 63 5Z94 16 62 Subtotals 771 84.330 952 1,142 - - - - 1,142 96.357 642 54 Grand Totals 220,951 1,051 1.261 484 1,453 148 192 2,907 249.483 1.475 49 SCENARIO C-2 Six stories, weighted towards dwelling unit development 13 Scenario C-2. Six story building, weighted towards , Dwelling Unit product on new development d ~ d R a m a i o e > N e °o - a VJ 9 c ~ ° d0 'a ~ ~ ° ° d `o d o d a 'L7 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ OC ~n d G . ~ V, a le a L E ~ Q C w E c ~ , ~ . ^ L ` ~ v O S ~ .y C m C = C ~ Q a e e o L ..yr Vi L O w ~ ~ ~ d 9 d ~ O .r'd' ~ W ,~a. C ~ O ~G CI Y C C ~ E LL Building Name (a.k.a.) ; ..7 Oi C~ ry Z C CL G C M1ew Develooment 1\ o rth Day Lot 59,449 70 % 41,614 35 % 20,807 70 % 14,565 6 56 % 5.156 30 % I S% 40 % 22%. 2 1Vest Day Lot 114,775 70% 80,343 60 % 68,565 80 % 55,092 6 56 % 30,852 30'/ 20 % 40 % 25 / 3 VA Service Yard 115,778 70'% 81,045 60 % 69,467 80 % 55,573 6 56% 31,121 30 % 20% 40 % 25 % J Face of Parking Structure 10,690 70% 7,483 90% 9,621 90"/. 8,659 6 56% 4.849 201%. 20% 40% 25% 5 Infi11 at East Bus Drop-off 5,623 70'% 3,936 90% 5,061 80% 4,049 6 56% 2,267 30'% 20'%. JOU 25%, Subtotals 306,315 214,421 173,821 Redevelooment of existina aroaerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 11,283 70'% 7,898 65 % 7,334 80'% 5,867 6 56'% 3,286 30'% 20'% 40'% 25'%, 8 Vail Associates Core Site 97,371 70'% 68,160 65 % 63,291 75'% 47,468 6 56'% 26,582 30'% 20'% 40 % 25% 9 LandmarkTownhomes 30,000 70% 21,000 70/ 21,000 85% 17,850 6 56% 9,996 30/ 20% 40% 25% to Lazier Arcade 14,316 70 % 10,021 85 % 12,169 70 % 8.518 6 56"/« 4,770 30'% 20'% 40% 25'% I1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 41,513 70'% 29,059 70'% 29,059 85 % 24,700 6 56'%. 13,832 301% 20'% 10 % 25'% 12 Lionsprideandparkingstructure 22,518 70% 15,763 70% 15,763 80% 12,610 6 7,062 30U 20% 40% 25%. Subtotals 217,001 151,901 148,615 5 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 AnHers (1972) 13,000 70 % 9,100 90 % 11,700 80'% 9,360 6 56 % 5,242 30 % 20 L. 40'%- 25'%. i5 Lifthouse Lodse 15,90j 70"« 11,134 95 % 15,110 90 % 13¢99 2 56'% 7,615 20'%. 20% 10 % 25 / 16 Jlarriotti~lountainResort(1979) 39,123 70/ 27,386 65/ 25.430 85/. 21,615 6 56'/ 12,105 30i 20/ 40/ 25% Subtotals 68,028 47,620 52,240 Ground Level Retail Exoansion 18 Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,680 70% 2,576 90% 3,312 0l/' o t 01/. o o'i, 20% ao%, 25v 19 LazierArcade 8,448 70% 5,914 90% 7,603 0% 0 1 0'% 0 0'% 20% 40'% 25% Su btotals 12,128 8,490 10,915 Grand Total, Potentia{ Scenarios 603,472 422,430 385,591 ['nlikelv Redevelo ment- 2? Enzian Condominiums (1973) 12,866 70% 9,006 70% 9,006 85% 7,655 6 56% 4,287 30% 20% 40/ 25% za Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 40,367 70 % 28,257 65 % 26,239 85 % 22,303 6 56% 12,490 30% 20 % 40 % 25 % 24 Landmark Tower 35,122 70 % 24,585 50 % 17,561 85"/» 14,927 6 56 % 5,359 30 % 20 % 40 % 25% 25 Va i l 21 15,532 70 % 10,872 70 / 10,872 85'%. 9,242 6 56% 5,175 30 / 20 % 40'% 25 1% 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 78,416 701% 54,891 70'% 54,891 85'% 46,658 6 56% 26,128 30% 20'% 401/6 25% 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 40,206 70-i. 28,144 70% 28,144 85i, 23,923 6 56/ 13~397 30i 20i ao% 251%. zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 59,629 70-i 41,740 60% 35.777 ss/ 30,411 6 56% 17,030 so% 20i ao% zs%, zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 42,785 70% 29,949 bo i 25,671 as % 21,820 6 56% 12,219 30% zo % ao% is i 30 6lontaneros(1972) 44,848 70% 31,394 70% 31,394 85% 26,685 6 56'% 14,943 30% 20% 401A 25'% 31 Treetops (1972) 38,690 70 % 27,083 60 % 23,214 85"/. 19,732 6 56 % 11,050 30'% 20 % 40'% 25 % 32 N'ail International(1975) 78,408 70% 54,886 70'% 54,586 83% 46,653 6 56'% 26,126 30% 20'% 40% 25% 33 lv'ail Spa Condominiums (1979) 152,460 70 % 106,722 60 % 91,476 85 % 77,755 6 56 % 43,543 30% 20 / 40 % 25% 34 Vailglo Lodge 27,977 70'% 19,584 70% 19,584 85 % 16,646 6 56'% 9,322 30 % 20 % 40 % 25 % 35 Vantage Point (1972) 68,520 70% 47,964 60'% 41,112 85% 34,945 6 56'% 19,569 30% 20% 40% 25% 36 Westwind (1969) 369988 70'% 25,892 70 % 25,892 85 % 22,008 6 56% 12,324 301A 20 % JO % 25 % Subtotals 772,814 540,970 495,718 Grand Totals 1,376,286 963,400 881,309 Scenario C-2. Six story building, weighted towards ~ - Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ c ~ ~ . o y Y ~ v L {t N > m ~ V y Cr W Q w o i E c = - . E o E J F e ;i = J 'e - ~ u d m D i d ~ i n m a „ n m a m o a. 8 o a ~ a c d a G ~ G - E o ec E ~ e'c Building Name (~e a.k.a ` a Q 2 z A. 'T Q o < New Develooment i North Day Lot 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 i 2 West Day Lot 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 3 VA Service I'ard 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 q Face of Parking Structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 i 375 2 s tnfill at East Bus Drop-off 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 z Subtotals Redevelooment of existin¢ orooerties 7 Concert Hatl Plaza 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 1 375 2 a Vail Associates Core Site 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 9 Landmark Townhomes 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 to Lazier Arcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 .f ?,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 it Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 lz Lionspride and parking structure 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 i 375 2 Subtotals Additionat Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 15 Lifthouse Lodgc 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 16 Ntarriott Mountain Resort(1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Giround Level Retail Exoansion ls Town of Vail Park Parcel 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 ~9 LazierArcade 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 d 375 2 Subtotals Grand Total, Potentiat Scenarios Unlikelv Redevelo ment- 22 Enzian Condominiums (1973) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 24 LandmarkTower 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 i 375 2 25 V811 21 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Zs Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 27l.ionsheadCenter(1969) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 30 Montaneros (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 31 Treetops (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 J 375 2 32 1'ail Itlternational (1975) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 34 Vailglo Lodge 1.600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 35 Vantage Point (1972) 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 4 375 2 36 Westwind (1969) 1,600 2,0 2.0 4 1,600 2.0 2.0 a 375 2 Subtotals Grand Totals I Scenario C-2. Six story building, weighted towards o . Dwelling Unit product on new development o ~ C R o.. o cu, ~ a o G ~ Q N O ~ e > v40i C C a ~ ~ 'z ~ R ~ rd 9 C ° ~ . 7 ~ OE C ~ L V OE It ~ d u Y L V 4 O Q ~ U VI V' V1 Q~ y [ ~ pp 00 y v.C` C C C O a e q Q C Y ~ ~ ` V Building Name (a.k.a.) u tiew Develonment 1 North Day Lot 20 % 0% 80'% 100 % 73,333 100"/. 0% 0% 77,494 16,757 21.62 % z WestDayLot 20'% 0% 80'% 100% 269,510 100% 0% 0"/» 283,283 70,132 21.76'% 3 VA Service Yard 501% 0"/« 50 % 100"/0 251,025 100"/0 01%. 0% 285,759 69,703 24,39 % 4 Face of Parking Structure 100 U o/ 0'7 100 / 38,5I5 loo / Ov o% 48,136 11,553 24.00% S Infill at East Bus Drop-off toa'r oi oi. 160/ 15,757 too/ oi oi6 20,818 4,951 23.78-z. Subtotals 648,140 715,489 Redevelooment of existina arooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza I ooIi oi oi loo/ 22,935 10 0 1/6 oi, o% 30,169 7,175 23.78%, S Vail Associates Core Site 100'% 0% 0'% 1001% 184,747 20 % 30'% 50% 248,038 72.701 29.31'% 9 LandmarkTownhomes 0% 0% 1001y. ]00% 90,472 100% 0/ 0% 90,472 22,618 :5.001f j o LazierArcade 1001%, 0'% 0% 100'% 33,152 100'% 0'% 0'% 45,321 10,72: 23.66%. 1t LionSquare Nrth Phase 4 (1972) o% oi too% too% 125,192 loo'r o% o% 125,192 31,298 25.00%. tz Lionspride and parking structure 60% oi 40% 100% 55,393 too% oi o% 64,841 15,737 24.27"K Subtotals 511,782 604,033 Additional Densitv Added.. Iq AnUers(1972) 01% 01% 100% 100'% 48.129 100% 0'% 0'%, 48.129 12,032 25.00'%. .s Lifthouse Lodge 0'%. 0'% 0'%. 100'%. 16,971 100'% 0'%, 0'% 32,081 4,243 13.23'%. 16MarriottMountainResort(1979) Oly. 0% 1001%. IOOL. 109,557 100% OU 0'% 109,557 27,389 25.00% Subtotals 174,658 189,767 Grdund Level Retail Exnansion 18 Town of Vail Park Parcel 1oo:i o% o/ too%. - 50%. 50-/, o% 3,312 66: 2o.oo~i. 19 LazierArcade t00%, 0°. o'/~ 100/ - So% 50% o/. 7,603 1,521 20.00'/ Subtotals _ 10,915 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 1,334,580 1.520,205 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) oi, oi 100i tooi 38,801 too/ oi o% 38,801 9,700 25.00%. 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 0% 0% 1001% 100 / 113,041 100 % 0% 0% 113,041 28,260 25.00 za LandmarkTower SO% 0/ 50/ 100% 66,876 100% 0/ 0% 75,656 18,475 24.42'i, 25 V911 21 100'/ 0% 0% 100'% 35,968 100% 0'% 0% 46,840 11,166 23.84'%. 26LionSquareLodgePhases1-3 oi oIi tooi 100i 235,482 1001% o1/4 o% 236,482 59,121 25.00i. n Lionshead Center(1969) 100% o%. o%. 100% 93,107 tooi. oi, o% 121,251 28,906 23.84% 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) 0% 0% 100'% ]00'/ 154,136 100 % 0 U 0'% 154,136 38,531 25.00'% 29 LodgeatLionsheadPhase3(1976) a% oi looi, 1 ooi, 110,595 tooi, oi. o% 110,595 27,6+9 25.00% 30 NIonteneros(1972) 30'/ 0/ 70'% 100'/ 125,832 100% 0%. 0'/ 135,250 33,312 24.65'% 31 Treetops(1972) 501i o% so% 1 ooIi 88,404 100% oi. or wo,ou 24,422 za.az'i, 32 Vaillnternational(1975) O'i" 0% 100% IOOU 236,458 100% Oi 0% 236,958 599115 25.001i. 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) ao/ 0% 60% 1001y'. 357,507 100% O'i, 0/ 394,097 96,695 24.541i. 34 Vailglo Lodge oIi o% too^r. looi 84,371 100%, o-i, o% 84,371 21.093 zs.oor 35 Vantage Point (1972) ai oi loo'/ 100i 177,119 tooi oi. o%, 177,119 44,280 25.00% 36 Westwind(1969) 0% 0% 100% 100% 111,546 100% 0% 0% 111,546 27,887 25.00'. Subtotals 2,030,241 2,135,654 Grand Totals 3,364,821 3,655,859 Scenario C-2. Six story building, weighted towards . Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ ~ ~ w K ~ V; U L " E c ' c Z ~ e ~i e Building Name (a.k.a.) New Develooment , 1 North Day Lot 4,161 624 3,537 73,333 73,332.72 16,133 57,200 - - - 2 WCSt Day LOt 13,773 2,755 11,018 269,510 269,510 67,378 202,133 - - - 3 VA Service Yard 34,733 6,947 27,787 251,025 251,025 62,756 158,269 - - - a Face of Parking Structure 9,621 1,924 7,697 38,515 38,515 9,629 28,886 - - - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 5,061 1,012 4,049 15,757 15,757 3,939 11,818 - - Subtotals gq pgg Redevelonment of existine prooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 7}34 1,467 5,867 22,835 22,834.99 5,709 17,126 - - - e Vail Associates Core Site 63,291 12,658 50,633 184,747 36,949 9137 27,712 55,424 13,556 41,568 9 Landmark Town homes - . - 90,972 90,472 22,618 67,854 - - - 10 Lazier Arcade 12,169 2,434 9,735 33,152 33,152 8,288 24,864 - - - 11 Lion Square tirth Phase 4(1972) - 125,192 125,192 31,298 93,894 - - - 12 Lionspride and parking structure 9,458 1,892 7,566 55,353 55.383 13,846 41,538 - - - Subtotals 73,801 Additional Densitv Added.. 14 Antlers (1972) 48,129 45,129.12 12.032 36.097 - - - 15 Lifthouse Lodge 16,971 )6,971 4,243 12,728 - - - 16 D[arriott btountain Resort (1979) 109,557 109557 27,389 82,168 - - - Subtotals _ Ground Levcl Retail Exoansion ts Town of Vail Park Parcel 3,312 662 2,650 - - - _ lv Lazier Arcade 7,603 1,521 6,083 SubtotHls 8,732 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 l:nlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzian Condominiums (1973) _ 38,801 38,800.51 9,700 29,100 - - - 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) - 113,041 113,041 28,260 84,781 - - - 24 LandmarkTower 8,781 1,756 7,024 66,876 66,876 16,719 50,151 - - - 25 Vail21 10,872 2.174 8.698 35,968 35.968 8,992 26,976 - - - 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 - _ - 236,482 236,482 59,121 177,362 - - - 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 28,144 5,629 22,515 93,107 93,107 23,277 69,830 - - - zs Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) - _ - 154,136 154,136 38,534 115,602 - - - 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) - . . 110,595 110,595 27,649 82,946 - - - 30 N(ontaneros (1972) 9,416 1,884 7,534 125,832 125,832 31,458 94.374 31 Treetops (1972) 11,607 2,321 9,286 88,404 88,404 22,101 66,303 - - - 32 Vail International (1975) _ _ _ 236,458 236,458 sv,us 177,344 - - - 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 36,590 7,318 29,272 357,507 357,507 89,377 268,130 - - - sa Vailglo Lodge . . _ 84,371 84,371 21.093 63r79 - - - 35 Vantage Point (1972) 177,119 177,119 44,280 132,839 - - - 36 Westwind (1969) 111,546 111b46 27,887 83,660 - - - Subtotals 84,330 Grand Totals 220,951 Scenario C-2. Six story building, weighted towards . Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ o ~ y ~ C C ~ ~ Q ~ h r.; 2 F~. p C ~ a• •e 4 U F: t: d d d u` ed Building Name (a.k.a.) Q Q Q ~ z z z z z 2 ~ New Develooment 1 tiorth Day Lot 77,494 36 143 - - - - z West Day Lot 283,283 126 505 - - - - s VA Service Yard 285,759 118 471 - - - - a Face of Parking Structure 48,136 ta n - - - - 5 Infill at East Bus Drop-off 20,818 7 30 - - - Subtotals - 305 1,221 - - - - Redevelonment of existine oroaerties • 7 Concert Hall Plaza 30,169 u 43 - - - - s Vail Associates Core Site 92,373 36,949 55,424 248,038 17 69 26 104 148 296 v LandmarkTownhomes - _ - 90,472 42 170 - - - - 10 Lazier Arcade - - - 45,321 16 62 - - - - tt Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 125,192 Sv 235 - - - - i± Lionspride and parking structure _ 64,841 26 toa - - - - Subtotals 92,373 171 682 26 104 148 296 Additional Densitv Added.. ta Antlers (1972) _ 48,129 23 vo - - - - is LifthouseLodge 16971 8 32 16 Marriott M1tountain Resort (1979) 109,557 St 205 - - - Subtotals _ gz 327 Ground Level Retail Exnansion 1 s Town of Vail Park Parcel 3.312 . _ 19 Lazier Arcade 7,603 _ Subtotals Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 92,373 558 2,231 26 104 148 296 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- 2z Enzian Condominiums (1973) - - - 38,801 18 73 - - - - 23 Lionshead (nn (Lostello) 113,041 53 212 - - - - zJ LandmarkTower 75,656 31 125 - - - - 25 Vai121 - - - 46,890 17 67 - - - - 26 Lion SquAre Lodge Phases 1-3 - - - 236,482 111 443 - - - - 27 Lionshead Center(1969) 121,251 44 175 - - - - za Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) . - • 154,136 n 289 - - - - zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) 110,595 Sz 207 - - - - 30 Montaneros (1972) - - - 135,250 59 236 - - - - 31 Treetops (1972) 100,011 41 166 - - - - 3: Vaillnternational(1975) - - - 236,458 111 443 - - - - 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 394,097 168 670 - - - - 34 Vailglo Lodge 84,371 ao iss - - - - 35 N'antage Point (1972) - - - 177,119 83 332 - - - - 36 Westwind (1969) 111,546 52 209 - - - - Subtotals - 952 3,807 - - - - Grand Totals 92,373 1,509 6,037 26 104 148 296 Scenario C-2. Six story , building, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development ~ 0 y e c ~ 4+ 'i ~ ~ V ~ ~ - G p ; r: p G ~ a ~ a ~ d d o`I ~ e E c c `w cd r e d . ~ w a V ~ U ~ u w ~ ? t E E T ~ T ' V C ~ L ~ B C ? V ~ ~ N 41 ~ `Oi U ~ E E 6C a Cd^. 2y. Z E s ~ Building Name (a.k.a.) m c m c~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ oe a a Q ~ New Develonment I North Day Lot 5.5 tv 0.4 14 0.4 - 0.75 - 31 0.76 26 zWest Day Lot s.s 61 0.4 st 0.4 - OJS - 111 1 84 3 VA Service Yard 5.5 153 0.1 47 0.4 • 0.75 - 200 1 152 4 Face of Parking Structure 5.5 az 0.4 7 0.4 - 0.75 - so 1 38 5 lnfill at East Bus Drop-off 5.5 22 0.4 3 0.4 - 0.75 - 25 1 19 Subtotals 297 122 - - 420 Redevclooment of existing oroperties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 5.5 32 0.4 4 0.4 - OJS - 37 1 28 S Vail Associates Core Site 5.5 278 0.4 7 0.4 10 0.75 111 407 1 309 9 LandmarkTownhomes 5.5 - 0.4 17 0.4 - oas - » 1 13 10 LazierArcade 5.5 54 0.4 6 OA - 0.75 - 60 1 45 i I Lion Squarc Nrth Phase 4(1972) 5.5 - 0.4 23 0.4 - 0.75 - 23 t is 12 Lionspride and parking structure 5.5 42 oA lo 0.4 - 0J5 - 52 1 40 Subtotals 406 68 10 111 59i Additional Densitv Added.. IJ Antlers (1972) 5.5 - 0,4 9 0.4 - OJS - 9 1 7 ts Lifthouse Lodge 5.5 - 0.4 3 0.4 - 0.75 - 3 t 2 16 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) 5.5 - 0.4 21 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 1 16 Subtotals - 33 - - 33 Grodnd Level Retail ExoAnsion is Town of Vail Park Parcel 5.5 15 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - ts 1 11 19 La2icr Arcadc 5.5 33 0.4 - 0.4 - 0.75 - 33 I 25 Subtotals qg _ _ _ 48 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 751 223 10 111 1,096 Linlikelv Redevelo ment- zz Enzi:in Condominiums (1973) 5.5 - o..t 7 0.4 - 0.75 - 7 1 6 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 5.5 - o.s 21 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 1 tG 21 Landmark Tower 5.5 39 0.4 13 0.4 - 0.75 - 51 t 39 ZS VAi121 5.5 48 0.4 7 0.4 - 0.75 - 55 1 41 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 5.5 - 0.4 44 0.4 - 0.75 - aa t 34 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 5.5 124 0.4 17 0.4 - 0.75 - 141 i 107 28 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) s.s - 0.4 29 0.4 - 0.75 - 29 1 22 zv Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) s.s - 0.4 zt 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 i 1e 30 Montaneros (1972) 5.5 41 0.4 24 OA - 0.75 - 65 l 49 31 Treetops (1972) 5.5 51 0.4 17 OA - 0.75 - 68 1 st 32 Vail International (1975) 5.5 - 0.4 aq 0.4 - 0.75 - aa t 34 33 Vai) Spa Condominiums (1979) 5.5 161 0.4 67 0.4 - 0.75 - 228 1 173 34 Vailglo Lodge 5.5 - 0.4 16 0.4 - 0.75 - 16 1 lz 35 Vantage Point (1972) 5.5 - 0.4 33 0.4 - OJS - 33 t 25 36 Westwind (1969) 5.5 oA 21 0.4 - 0.75 - 21 1 16 Subtotals 464 381 - - 844 Grand Totals 1,215 604 10 ll l 1,950 I r Scenario C-2. Six story building, weighted towards . Dwelling Unit product on ~ new development ~ ~ 0 0 i V e ~ L C/] d L = L G y " h s ~ ti, S • Ya c ° ~ x' C> z -010 ~ d a ~ d c o'`~ [ y a ~ c a A. = p p C p ~ ~ ~ ~ - c y . d = ~ = ~ a = ; _ ° vs, vYi e vyi a a a = u ~ ° e w w ~ a ` ~ ` Q p L" Q Building Name (a.k.a.) Z e a < v o c~ a New Develooment t tiorth Day Lot 150 101 3,620 253.13 0 138 0 3,620 301%, 75'%. 65 % 2West Day Lot 150 IOI 12,791 253.13 0 138 0 12,791 30 / 75 % 63 / 3 VA Service Yard 150 101 11,914 253.13 0 138 0 11,914 30 / 75 / 65% 4 Face of Parking Structure 150 101 1,828 253.13 0 138 0 1,828 30 % 75 % 65 % 5[nflll at East Bus Drop-off 150 101 748 253.13 0 138 0 748 30'/ 75 i65 / Subtotals 30,401 0 0 30,901 Redevelooment of existine prooerties 7 Concert Hall Plaza 150 101 1,084 253 0 138 0 1,084 30'% 7565% 8 Vail Associate5 Core Site 150 101 1,754 253 6,576 138 20,451 28,781 30 % 75 % 65 % 9 LandmarkTownhomes 150 101 4,294 253 0 138 0 4,294 30'% 75% 65% ' Io LazierArcade 150 101 1,573 253 0 138 0 1573 30% 75'% 65% I1 Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) 150 101 5,992 253 0 138 0 5,942 30'% 75 1%. 65 % tz Lionsprideandparidngstructure 150 101 2,629 253 0 138 0 2,629 30% 751%, 65% Subtotals 17,275 6,576 20,451 41,303 Additional Densitv Added.. 11Antlers(1972) ?50 IOI 2,284 253 0 138 0 2,284 30% 75% 65% 15 LiRhouseLodge 150 101 805 253 0 138 0 805 301% 75% 65% 16 Marriott biountain Resort (1979) 150 101 5,200 253 0 138 0 5,200 30'% 75% 65% Subtotals 8,289 0 0 8,289 Ground Level Retail Exuansion 11 Town of Vail Park Parcel 150 tol 0 253 0 138 o 0 30'Y6 7 5%.. 65%, tv Lazicr Arcade , tso 101 0 253 0 138 0 0 301% 75'% 65'% Subtotals 0 0 0 0 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 56,465 6,576 20,451 83,493 Unlikelv Redevelo ment- 2: Enzian Condominiums (1973) ISO ]0] 1,842 253 0 138 0 1,842 30'% 75% 65% 23 Lionshead Inn (Lostello) 150 ]Ol 5,365 253 0 138 0 5,365 30%, 75'%. 65% 21 LanJmarkTower 150 lOt 3,174 253 0 138 0 3,174 301%. 75% 65% 25 N'ai121 150 101 1,707 253 0 138 0 1,707 30! 75"/,. 65% 26 Lion Square Lodge Phases 1-3 150 lo] ttZzJ 253 0 138 0 11,224 30% 751% 65/ 27 Lionshead Center (1969) 150 ]01 4,419 253 0 138 0 4.419 30"/« 75% 65% 2s Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) lso 101 7,315 253 0 138 o 7,315 30%. 75 "K 65 / 29 Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3 (1976) 150 101 5,249 253 0 138 o 5,249 301z, 75% 651/6 30 Montaneros(1972) 150 toi 5,972 253 o 138 o 5,972 30% 75i 65% 31 Treetops (1972) I50 101 4,196 253 0 138 0 4,196 30% 75'% 65'%. 32 Vaillnternational(1975) 150 101 11Z23 253 0 138 0 11,223 30% 75/ 65%. 33 VailSpaCondominiums(t979) ISO lOt 16,968 253 0 138 0 16,968 30/ 75% 65% 34 Vailglo Lodge 150 IOi 4,001 253 0 138 0 4,004 30'% 75'% 65% 35 YantagePoint(1972) 150 101 8,406 253 0 138 0 8A06 30% 75G, 65^/. 36 NN'estwind(1969) 150 101 5,294 253 0 138 0 5,294 30% 75" 65% 5ubtotals 96,357 0 0 96,357 Grand Totals 152,822 6,576 20,451 179,850 ~ • Scenario C-2. Six story , building, weighted towards Dwelling Unit product on new development V ~ 4 ~ r ~ ~ 'G ~ ~ a y e c a = V1 ~ " ~ T ¢ L L [ _ ~ ~ ; h ; ? L I K Y ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ y Building Name (a.k.a.) y \ew• Develooment r 1\orth Day Lot 3,537 36 i,} 3.620 26 26 :NN cst Day Lot I1.018 126 i 152 - - - - 15: 12.791 Sa .IS JN'A Service Yard 27.787 118 111 - - - - lal 11.914 152 44 a Face of Parking Structure 7,697 p ' 22 22 i,sZ$ 38 74 s Infill at East Bus Drop-off 4,049 7 g 9 748 19 57 Subtotals 54,088 , 305 366 366 30.901 3l9 J3 Redevelooment of eYistine orooerties 'r Concert Hail Plaza 5,867 11 13 - - - - 13 1,084 :s 41 8Vuii Associates Core Site 50,63 17 11 26 78 148 192 291 28.781 309 8 9 Landmark Townhomes _ ;Z 51 51 1,294 13 6: 10 Lazier Arcade 9.735 16 19 - - - - 19 1,573 .Ji 47 i i Lion Square Nrth Phase 4(1972) , _ Sq 70 70 5,942 ts 6: i: Lionspride and parkin-, structure 7.566 25 31 - - 31 2,629 so So Subtotals 73,801 171 205 26 78 118 192 475 41,303 45? 34 .additional Densitv Added 11 Antlers (1972) - 23 27 - - 2r81 7 76 i5 Lifthouse Lodge , . g 10 to Sos 2+ 15 Marriott Mountain Resort (1979) Subtotals 51 62 - - 62 5100 16 57 . 82 98 - - - - 98 8.289 3; 52 Ground Level Retail Ecoansion ia 1Town of Vail Park Parcel ' Z bso _ - - 19 Lazier ArcBde 6.083 25 Subtotals 8.732 - - - - - - - - 37 Grand Total, Potential Scenarios 136,621 558 669 26 78 148 192 939 83.493 833 43 [ nlikeh Redevelo ment- Enzian Condominidms (1973) _ i8 22 1,842 6 62 23 Lionshead Inn (jCostello) . 53 64 64 5365 16 57 24 Landmark Tower 7,024 31 38 38 3,174 39 39 ZS N'ai121 8.698 17 20 1.0 1.707 41 47 zs Lion Syu:ire Lodge Phases 1-3 _ 111 13 133 11r24 34 62 27 Lionshead Center(1969) 22315 44 SZ 52 4.419 107 47 :s Lodge at Lionshead Phase 1& 2(1970) . n 87 g^ 7,315 53 7" Lodge at Lionshead Phase 3(1976) _ SZ bZ 62 5,249 la 53 3u Montaneros (1972) 7,534 Sq 71 71 5,972 49 57 31 Treetops(1972) 9386 JI 50 - - - - 50 3.~96 SI ~7 31 1~ail fn[ernationat (1975) • 111 133 - - - - • 133 11 _123 N 61 33 Vail Spa Condominiums (1979) 29,272 168 201 201 16,968 173 48 - 34 N"ailQlu Lodge - 10 47 4.004 1: 6+ 35 Vantrge Point (1972) - 83 tpp - - - - 100 5.106 2$ 53 36 NVestµind (1969) - 52 63 - ' ' - 53 5,294 16 62 Subtotals 84.330 952 1,142 - - - - 1.132 96.357 642 51 Grand Totals 220,9St 1,509 1,811 26 78 148 192 2,081 179,850 1,47> 49 • MEMORANDUM T0: Town Council FROM: Dominic Mauriello, Chief of Planning DATE: June 11, 1998 SUBJECT: Updated Charts for Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Attached, for your Lionshead notebook, are a new set of "Charts" as presented at your June 9, 1998 meeting on the Lionshead Master Plan. They have all been reproduced for easier reading and include all data presented by Ethan Moore of DesignWorkshop. • F:\EVERYON E\COU NC I L\ME MOS\98\LH.616 • e TO{9N OF YAiL Table of Charts • Figure A- Average dwelling units (Density) per acre generated by new and redeveloped properties Figure B- Dwelling and fractional fee units generated by new and redeveloped properties Figure C- Accommodation units generated by new and redeveloped properties Figure D- People generated by new and redeveloped properties (visitors staying in AU, DU and FFU products) Figure E- Annual skier days generated by new and redeveloped properties Figure F- Retail space generated by new and redeveloped properties Figure G- Employees generated by new and redeveloped properties Figure H- Total net gain of dwelling and fractional fee units Figure I- Total net gain of accommodation units Figure J- Total net gain of people (visitors staying in AU, DU and FFU products) • Figure K- Total net gain of retail properties Figure L- Total net gain of retail/ commercial based employees Figure M- Total net gain of DU/ FFU employees Figure N- Total net gain of accommodation unit employees Figure O- Total net gain employees ( all new employees from all sources) ~ 60 DU/Acre 40 DU/Acre 6 6 30 DU/Acre 4 Stories 20 DU/Acre 6 6 10 DU/Acre 4 ~ Stories ~ ~ ~ w WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE iJNIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING LTNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUII.DING- 14 DU/ Acre 4 STORY BUII..DING- 31 DU/ Acre 5 STORY BUII.,DING- 16 DU/ Acre 5 STORY BUII.,DING- 37/ DU Acre 6 STORY BUII.DING- 19 DU/ Acre 6 STORY BUII.DING- 43 DU/ Acre NOTE: The above density figures ONLY count dwelling units towazds density! The actual total unit count (FFU plus Di) is the same for both scenarios AVERAGE DWELLING UNITS (DENSITY) PER ACRE ON NEW AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES 660 DU & FFU Unlts Total 600 DU b FFU Unlts Totai 6 Storlas 460 DU b FFU Units Totel 6 Storles 400 DU b FFU Units Totel 360 DU d? FFU Unlts Total 4 Storfes 300 DU d? FFU Unlts Totei 260 DU d? FFU Unlts Total 200 DU & FFU Unlts Totai 160 DU b FFU Unlts Total 100 DU b FFU Unlts Total 60 DU b FFU Units Total 4 STORY BLJII,DING- 341 5 STORY BUII,DING- 428 6 STORY BUII,DING- 515 NOTE: The quantities shown above represent the NET GAIN of DU's and FFU's given the assumed redevelopment scenarios DWELLING AND FRACTIONAL FEE UNITS GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES FIGURE B • 200 Accomodation Units 6 Storie 176 Accomodation Units 160 Accomodation Units 6 torie 125 Accomodation Units 4 Storle 100 Accomodation Units 76 Accomodation Units 60 Accomodatlon Units 26 Accomodation Units 4 STORY BUII.DING- 123 5 STORY BUII,DING- 158 6 STORY BUII.,DING- 192 NOTE: Due to the extreme difficulty and unlikely nature of any small incremental AVs being added to redeveloped properties, the model has utilized the Vail Associates core site only in projecting new accomdation units. Important note: Even though the four story scenario shows a net gain of 123 accomodation units, it is possible that ttus number of units would not be economically feasible to create in a redevelopment situation- potentially equaling zero accomodarion units. ACCOMODATION UNITS GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES FIGURE C 2000 "People" Generated 1760 "People" Generated 6 Storles 1600 "Peopie" Generated 6 Storles 1260 "People" Generated 4 Storles 1000 "People" Generated 6 Storles 760 "People" Genereted 6 Storles 4 Storles _ 600 "People" Generated A ~ 260 "People" Generated ~ w WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE UNIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING iJNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUII.DING- 1,223 4 STORY BiJII.DING- 645 5 STORY BUII.,DING-1,494 5 STORY BUII.DING- 792 6 STORY BUII..DING- 1,765 6 STORY BUII.DING- 939 NOTE: "People" refers to the amount of people staying in accomdation units, dwelling units, and fractional fee units at any given point in time. These figures have been adjusted to reflect the average occupancy percentages of these unit types. PEOPLE GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVEL D PROPERTIES 176,000 Skier Days 160,000 Skier Deys g Storles 126,000 Skler Days 5 Storles 100,000 Skier Days 4 Storles 76,000 Skier Days 6 Storles 6 Storles 60,000 Skier Days 4 Storles W 26,000 Skier Days ~ ~ ~ w WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE iJNIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING iJNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUII..DING- 105,946 4 STORY BUII,DING- 57,174 5 STORY BUII.DING- 129,536 5 STORY BUII.DING- 70,333 6 STORY BUII,DING- 153,126 6 STORY BUII.,DING- 83,493 ANNUAL SKIER DAYS GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retall 4 Stories 6 Stories 6 Stories 76,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 60,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 26,000 Sq. Ft. Retail w ~ C7 6 ~ w 4 STORY BiTILDING- 92,806 s.f. 5 STORY BiJILDING- 92,806 s.f. 6 STORY BUII.DING- 92,806 s.f. NOTE: Net gain of retail space is consistent across all scenarios, as the first floor coverage does not change from scenario to scenario RETAIL SPACE GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVELO D PROPERTIES 800 Employes's Generated - ce Storles 6 Storles 6 Storles 6 Storles 4 Storles 4 Storles 700 Empioyee's Qenereted 600 Employee's Generated 600 Employee's Generated 400 Employea's Generated 300 Employea's Generated C7 200 Employee's Generated ~ 100 Employee's Generated ~ w WEIGHTED TOWARD WEIGHTED TOWARD FRACTIONAL FEE LJNIT DEVELOPMENT DWELLING LJNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 STORY BUII.,DING- 750 4 STORY BiTILDING- 750 5 STORY BUII..DING- 791 5 STORY BUILDING- 791 6 STORY BiTII.DING- 833 6 STORY BUILDING- 833 NOTE: While the employee generation figures are the same for each scenario, the occupancy rate difference between DVs and FFLTs should be considered when assessing actual, real-world employee generation counts EMPLOYEES GENERATED BY NEW AND REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES 1300 DU & FFU Units Totai NET GAIN 616 UNITS Storles 1200 DU E? FFU Unlts Total NET GAIN 428 UNITS 6 Storle 1100 DU 8 FFU Unlts Total NET GAIN 341 UNITS 4 Storle 1000 DU $ FFU Unlts Total 900 DU & FFU Unlts Total EXISTING 800 DU 8? FFU Units Total 738 UNITS 700 DU 8? FFU Unlts Total 600 DU & FFU Unlts Totai 600 DU b FFU Units Total 400 DU $ FFU Unlts Total 300 DU 8? FFU Unlts Total 200 DU & FFU Unlts Totel 100 DU & FFU Units Totel TOTAL NET GAIN DWELLING/ FRACTIONAL FEE UNITS FIGURE H ~ 600 Accomodation Unlts NET GAIN 192 AU'S 6 660 Accomodation Units NET GAIN 168 AU'S 6 NET GAIN 123 AU'S 4 500 Accomodatlon Units 460 Accomodation Units 400 Accomodation Units Existing • AU's 360 Accomodatlon Units 300 Accomodation Units 260 Accomodation Units 200 Accomodation Units 160 Accomodatlon Unlts 100 Accomodatlon Units 60 Accomodatlon Units 0 TOTAL NET GAIN ACCOMODATION UNITS FIGURE I 4000 "People' Generated 6 3600 'People' Generated 6 FFU WelBhted Scenarlo 4 3000 'Peopie" Generated 6 6 DU Welphted 4 Saenarlo 2600 "People" Generated 2000 'People' Generated Exlstln8 Populetlon 1600 'People' Oenerated 1000 "People' Oenerated 600 'People' Qenerated TOTAL NET GAIN "PEOPLE" FIGURE J 200,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 176,000 Sq. Ft. Retail Future Retail 160,000 Sq. Ft. Retail RETAIL NET GAIN- 92,806 S.F. 100% INCREASE 126,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 100,000 Sq. Ft. Retail rRExisting ~ 76,000 Sq. Ft. Retail etail ~ 60,000 Sq. Ft. Retail 26,000 Sq. Ft. Retail NET GAIN RETAIL PROPERTIES 800 Employee's Generated 600 Employee's Generated NET GAIN 388 RETAIL EMPLOYEES a 400 Employee's Generated ~ Total ~ Existing ~ Retail w 200 Employee's Generated Em lo ees TOTAL NET GAIN RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEES ~ 400 Employee's Generated Existing DU/FFU 6 Stories 360 Employee's Generated Employees 6 Stories 4 Stories 300 Employee's Generated 260 Empioyee's Generated 200 Employee's Generated ~ ~ 160 Employee's Generated ~ w 100 Employee's Generated 60 Employee's Generated TOTAL NET GAIN DU/FFU EMPLOYEES 400 Employee's Generated Existing AU Employees 360 Employee's Generated 6 6 300 Employee's Generated 4 Stories 260 Employee's Generated 200 Employee's Generated z ~ 160 Employee's Generated w 100 Employee's Generated 60 Empfoyee's Generated TOTAL NET GAIN ACCOMODATION UNIT EMPLOYEES 1600 Employee's Generated - - 6 1400 Employee's Genersted 4 Storles 1200 Employee's Generated 1000 Employee's Generated 800 Employee's Generated ~ Total ~ Exlsting c7 600 Employee's Generatad Employees w 400 Employee's Generated 200 Employee's Generated TOTAL NET GAIN EMPLOYEES Ttle Detvvt BUSINESS BEYOND THE BORDER , ~ ~ M- ~ , ;iZ~,~ccb~rg - - ' ~ - ~ , _ << ~M I q a P Associated Press / Rene Ritler The Matterhorn provides a dramatic backdrop for much of the decade in the doldrums, things finally i the Riffeiberg hotel in Zermatt, Switzerland. After are looking up for Swiss tourism. ~ ~ Cl'i'mate look'i'ng better ~ . ~ for Swi*tzerland tourism ! Latest marketing apProach puts stress on value i 4y Clare Nullis a tighter budget to lesser-known Illi aims lo entice more young, , Associated Press parts. independent travelers by convert- ST. MOHPI"L, Switzerland - The "N'e want to get rid of the idea ing the town's historic central pris- ~ ringing of cash registers cuts that Switzerland is expensive," on into a youth hostet. The cell i through the clear mountain air as says Susanne Rieder, a board offi- structure - and probabiy even the i the jet set soaks up the "cham- cial. "We don't want to become a window bars - will stay intact. I pagne climate" of St. Moritz. cheap destination but a value-for- "And at least you can be sure ' Just like its more down-to-earth muney one.° your wallet will stitl be there in the i Swiss counterparts, SL Morilz, fhe The strategy, which is especially morning," he quips. Alpine resort for the "beautiful aimed at families, seems to be people," is having a beautiful year. Working. Lucerne also hopes to attract Rieder says Swiss Tourism has more upmarket visitors with a new After spending much of the de- signed deals with nearly 100 tour 1,800-seat concert and congress cade in the doldrums, Switzerland's hall, which is scheduled to o e ! tourism business is looking up r~SU~t~~rexpects ~ an r~addition 1 August to the fanfare of the Berlin thanks to a combination of good 200,000 hotel bookings this year. Philharmonic orchestra. ; weather, a weaker Swiss franc and F'or instance, American tourists St. Moritz, for its art, is thriv- ! better marketing. p i Hotel stays during the winter can buy a package deal for $1,158 ing on ils tried and tested motto of season were about 6 percent higher that includes air fare from New °class not mass." than a year earlier as a result of a YOrk, six nights at a choice of 150 'I'he town of 6,000 inhabitants al- Uig jump in the number of foreign hotels, and one week's car rental or tracted about 250,000 visitors last tourists. Ski resorts like St. Moritz a Swiss rail pass. year and had tourism revenue of ! and Lermatt enjoyed a jump in Such prices were unheard of a $658 million. More than half its ho- ; business of 15 percent to 20 pe~_ few years ago, when hoteliers tel beds are in the luxury or first- cent. looked down on budget-conscious class range. That is good news for the slu travelers. The resort, at an elevation of ish econom where 300,000 'ob "The years of poor business more than 5,900 feet, markets it- ; g Y' J made people realize they had to T one in every 11 - are connected make an effort," says Rieder. self with the slogan "On Top of the to tourism. Foreign visitors spent The main exception to the gener- World" and boasts about its ' nearly $8 billion in Switzerland al cheer is the picture-postcard champagne climate" of more ~ last year, up 5 percent from 1996, town of Lucerne, Switzerland's than 320 days of sun a year. After the stren th of the Janu- , g nearest eyuivalent Lo a mass tour- In addition to having skiing into ary-March period, hopes are high ism mecca, with stereotyped at- iate April, the just-ended winter ' for a good summer season, too, traclions like IIeidi shows, Alpine season featured polo games, crick- with a surge of visitors from the horn playing and yodeling. et matches and classical concerts ' United States, Britain and Italy ex- The cily relies on Japanese, on the vast frozen lake and a gour- i pected to offset the slump in tour- South Koreans and Thai visitors met week with internationally re- ists from cash-strapped Asian for about 30 percent of its tourism noWned chefs. countries. business and expects a 10 percent "It's so rich. Just look at the shop i While the country's well-known fall in Uoth numbers of visitors and windows," gasped one foreigner. i resorts are established on the in- spending this year Uecause of the "Everything is unbelievably glam- ternational map, the national tour- Asian economic slump. orous. There are so many women , igt Goard, Swiss Tourism, is con- But Kurt llli, Lucerne's tourism with fur coats. They even have y centrating on attracting people on director, is upbeat. dogs to match." ' _ CARRYING CAPACITY MATRIX sis/se RESOURCE CRITICAL THRESHOLD COST FOR EXCEEDING THRESHOLD Vail Im lications Ecolocicat Caoaciri Wa1er Quantily 6 cfs $40 -$80 million (building new storage faality at Increased use, decxeases fbws beriveen golf " ~~imax) course and ireatmern plaM Water QualNy Sta1e water quality slandards. Phosphate may be a Loss of fisheries resource $2,541,000, Increased cost USGS Survey indicates heafthy 1rou1 critical issues in Vail of water lreatmenl for drinking water population in Vail Recreation 25 % increase in Forest use since 1970. Booth Ck Loss of recreation opporlunities, $8,942,000 (rafling Norlh Trail will increase lrail capacity in Vail and Gore Ck Trail used beyond capacity. USFS & fishing revenues) Management Plan will help define thresholds Wildlife 40% decrease in herd size in counly since 1970 Purchase devebped land & reslore critical wirner Open Lands Plan has protected remaining habhai crilical habital in Vail Air Quality PM10 50 ug/m3 (annual) Conversion of wood burning fireplaces 1o gas TOV in compliance wilh ali standards. I-70 PM10 150 ug/m3 (24 hour period) wiil be a source of future concem Noise 55 Decibels - residential Increase ot heaflh & safety cosls Comrrwnily survey reflecls sirong concern 90 Decibels - construction over irgerstate noise Phvslcal Ca acii ~ Undevebped U's ` Additional 505 units based on zoning 341-515 potential units in LH MourtlaiNSkier 19, ' - Loss of permit from ihe US Foresl Service Capacity Housing 621% of employees living in ihe Town of Vail Lack of employees TOV working on creating 1,680 additional beds (goal) Currerily have 32% of employees living in Vail Lodging bedbase of 32,000 Inadequate conference space, resuBs in bst opportunities FaciliN Caoacitv Solid Wasle Landfill life expectancy = 8-10 yrs $750,000 captal cosis to expand landfill 2% increase in County growlh will decrease Max capacity of 4,544,000 cubic yards landfill capacity by 1 year. Energy (Eleciricity) Adequate surpius to meet future demand Conservation measures Energy (gas) Adequate surplus 1o meet future demand Conservation measures Wa1er Treaiment 400 Single Family Equivalent Capacily Fewer impacis 1o siream flow lhan five years ago. Black Lake Reservar yield of 300 acre feet; There is a interconnect between Eagle River and Eagle Park Reservoir yield of 2,000 acre feet Gore Ck. Sewage Treatment 800 unils addilional capacily $600,000 pays for internal improvements to Forest District working on plans 1o expand Foresl Rd plant Road faciliiy- Cosis can be paid by tap fees 750 units addilional capacily $1.5 M+ land cosls - Requires addition to exisling , facilily 1,300 units additional capacity (Estimate for build $10 M Cost of Complete Build ou1 out) l CARRYING CAPACITY MATRIX s/sisa RESOURCE CRITICAL THRESHOLD COST FOR EXCEEDING THRESHOLD Vail Impllcations Roads Rounda-bouts 5,500 veh/hour $5 - 10 million tor a N-S crossing of I-70 at Samba Peak use currernly at 3,800 veh/hour Run Frontage Roads 3,060 vehThour $325 million for installation ot a 1/2 irnerchange Currenl use at 1700 vehihour Buses 25,000 people per day New buses; new staff A1 capacity on New Years, (46,000) and will be during 1999 World Championships. Transporlalion Authoritv irrvrovinp renional arp°„ nO capacity iswes 20% of guesls arrive at ECRA Parking full less lhan 100 daysJ156 days season $2810 $36 million for new parking struciure Police 31 officers (existing) $370,300 for 7 addiliorral officers currern population estimates 23,072, staffing level for 20, 000 population, natiorcal ratio 1.5 otticers / 1000 population Fire Based on ISO ralirig system, Vail Fire resources are slation + cost of land + fire trudc + 4 firefigMers pushed to capacity. Dept is concerned aboui adequaie coverage in W. Vail Education Elemenlary school = 365 sludenls New schools: Elemeritary school $9-$10 M Red sandslone currenily at 250 students Middle school = 475 studenls Middle school -$12 M Middle School at 182 studenls High school = 725 studerns High scFwol -$25 -$30 M High School a1530 students Hospital 49 Beds Reinstate lifestar helicopler program No capaciiy issues Communication No threshold at this time TOV Staff Fuil-time 207 employees, winter seasonal 80 On-going challenges tiliing vacancies empioyees, summer seasonal 30-40 empbyees Community Facilities Ford Park curreMly ulilized at capacily Social Caoaciri Eoonomy Minimum of 3% increase in sales tax revenue Increase in miil rate, Loss ot repeal business TOV budget projections planned in budget The Village Holiday Experierxe 19,900 skiers at one time Cat III expansion Overcrowding in the Village Loss of repeat business Local Culture 71 % ot housing units as 2nd tamily homes in Vail Common Ground intended to provide 1680 may be detrimental new beds over ten years 2. JUN, 3. 199B 9:10AM ' UR PUBLIC REI,ATIONS N0, 7357 P. 1/5 T0:-TOV Yail ~e~Or~s, IDC. coanct: Eric Readek -1Yeesum : Vail Rr.~awts. Iac_ • (970) 845 2490 FOR IIMMIATE REY.BAU o Rabat P. Zaan/Ed Bisao ~ Mirism Ad1a - Fimncfal Media Contatt MoMm:walim Assowam (212) 850-5600 VAIL RESORTB REPdRTS RECbRD TffiRD QUARTM AND MNL MONTS3 RESiJLTS - JletorrReMS~ars Jncr~ 1~96 ~r rl~ 7~ird Q~m~r _ - RewtE8l1'DW W 1496 - . Niur 11[o?xIe EPSnocker 31.35 - vaii, CO. Jmo 3,1998 ~ VyI' Rmwk& I= (NYSE:Mn;) today mwomcod 5aaacisi nsults fioz the fiscal th1rd Qtartar mod aine mqatits eadai Apri130,1998. R+esw Reveam aWluuduV rcmue fmm resl esuft operxtions, for the tird $scal quarter ended April 30, X94$. au a pzo Loma basi$, iacmsed 18l6 ro $170.1 million vr= SI44.7 miliion ia dw compRable pGriad last Year• Pra foxms ?otO Remvav,, wbich inchydcs revmm from real egm operations, ina+eased 17'1ti to SI 74.0 milIion Som S1483 millicw rqpoetod ia tbe fiscal d&d qumw lsst ~ Ym. Pr° Foo= =Mi12P fron,! ropwdm befm imbmt% in~ tam 69mclmdon and amatzation ('TAsort EBITDA") #'ar the guener penr tn 586.1 millicm, a 14% iaceem ova pro fomma Ramt EBIfDA, of 575.5 miilioain dya H'ral thk+d quatter last yeex. Pro foxma Net Incoft £c~ihe qww= ran to S41.7 miDioo, or $120 per slxe dih"comPad to 536.7 milliati, or a 1.07 pWsbate dilmd lasc year, s 12% numase in esrnings per a6m Reson Revewe and Reso=t BBITDA aowrh was aton'buWe mftu5m i=ws amss a11 major busiuess lim nsultiqg $m a ftmficnt i~masa ia ww= per Woier visit Re=t Revwu%fwtbe fu at niwaio4tb~ of fica11998, ae a Pro forma basis, inv~ 190A tio 5324.2 millian fim 5272.8 miilion m the MV=ble penod }aa yemr, while pm fma ToW Reveaues h=08wd 15% to $390.4 millina vftsua $339.7 milliam iu tbe sme period for 1997. -mmore- PO 9et 7. vaiL Cotorada .`t 658 9 phone 97D 476 5601 1UN, 3.1998 9:11AM UR PUBLIC RELATIONS N0,7357 P. 2/5 Aro fn= Reeoat FJUT'DA for tle wmo month pGriod wu $119.3 asiilim a 19ti6 avet $100.5 millioos reponed iqtha oopabk 1eriod Im Ym• Ne.t Yaemc cc a po Eo;ms b@66 f+or tbe aiae mooh pmod wu 546.9 million, ar $1.35 per diluted dsre, oomipared m $413 millim or $lal pu diloftd evqre in t6e smme pcdod aa 1997, a 12% in~ease in e4miags per s~re. For t1La Wm moift eaded April 30,1998 pao form wv~ pet skier vi* gcew tio a68.89 ' oomperod tio $55.99, a?.2% in ovar tt,ee same pmod last yeu_ ToW skiez wits fr ttLe tiurd qttarW wa+e 2.6 m0on venn 2.7 milliatt in tbe thud qmw last yatr. . Far the oozaplated1997-98 sia wasm, the fiur reobteporoed a omUinod 4,716,605 skier visfts, a 3.PAaedine fmthe 1996-97 =q=. 8eave,c Czeek bM arecosd year wfth s 3.7Yo ia=nse in sider visets wbilc V4 BrecIoCngad Keyabane a11 posad awdeBt decJiues. lbe overall declme in skier visita was due to fewer iocat ana and Deaver sldat vysits rmtdng $+om ve1ow avmge mv~*lL Adsm Aron, Omnmm aad MdEmwutir?e Offiaer, commmted„ "We a:+e aca+egoly plmd to have achieved dmm recmd results fnr both the tord quarm oad ame moaths of Ssce1199$_ They ace pfiftWubdY ~inlWg of tbe modest sidCr vM declme we t~oed. Our uwoplishm-M-nt vf rVcord £iuaucial pqfoW30ce thronO tiu #cat niac mooft teaffim= otu saa%U of divc~mg our ravet?ue bsse and illusteames our ebility do xepoat ieoozd sdes aaal emmgs gowth despW lm tm opttog sim Pi0 lbm K9WLS S'aNume tbC 80Q1iiqm0g, Of Bt+CCk~aRmge 8od KcySbOne i+es0lta Sncl Veil'S IAlU Pub& Offitiag (YP'O) o+oamed at *e be&ning aF ft periods perwnt4 ra&ff tban ft acpW J=my 311997 aoqWmNm dactte tmd Febe~wy 4,1997 IPO doe. Pm fomma remtlts also exdude ft ape~atiops of Arapeboe Baqja, wbich ara? diveatod in Sepiomba 1997 pursumt to acmsm der,tee arft the Unimd Staces Drpaorameat of Amdce, Vail Rmri*, inc. is tbe VeL~r mmtain raoit opemz in Natth America 11a Comcpaq7 oPeraes do Calora+do moUOMin?,ssocts of VaiL BeavCr Cre* Br~re~rid~ and Kaystone. S7oami,w" dusPws m6M odei NioR AwROrr of Airor*p! W&mmftL ar+e16rwrd JoAmS mmmm dm me oodcP+vsmwd ib die sO lwbor pMf0j&qr of rk PrfMS`mc,VWW l.it,patlou R~'on~e dc/ of I99J_ SeCNjbawspTlooAjqi 400ft,rb ~ Mbfaer ro c020% skks md ok,erMWda rlrr copfd eo~ ammf r*admen aoer ~rp001r~iq~r time pwerred ~Qoa~ mae ~d~or ~p~oee,u~ye ro~llarrcc aw df~mr~6r+~d~foo~a~eMOe ~k~~e~i~C o,~y a~ a~ hwaOf.' -qeah r*k od a*~ir$ bw(dit 61N mr aot mftd iq zpwel bwlmss md wonomdc e&m&ow; 'CMVffWM.1 WM in dn sb ad moM hAwy: md dw wtwhw- lnvesrm dne dlo dirwW lo ed1,w riaAs dismaiad fYr dor.~are+~~ledby dm CMpmy wryk i!WsecWW.r aWEmharp Cqmmio,z (Ubles bo fnllow) ~ JUN. 3, 1996 9:11AM '"UR PUBI.IC REI.ATIONS N0, 735? P. 3/5 va;1 Reswts, IAC. Co~tidated F~1 ~t~men~ ~0 mdl~ll~ Of dOI~? ~L~L ~V l11~ ~11115~ . ; -Pao 70]tKA,- unmaba unswatme e mb b nl 3 NaAMoaftP.t+dw cil 3 !!!t 19 199N 19! Na Renreom R~ 17O,o91 144,705 3yti9s a72,793 Wrmee 3 2 3,b07 65,760 66.90 . Net Rewcum 148,3 1Z 38%955 339,633 • . R~soes M413 67,453 200,552 169,323 3= 4.133 51,939 57,162 cwp~ mpme' 1I5"' 1,766 4,313 3,519 Drplw,iedon & aaorruatiaa 1_ LA8s 9,714 31,163 L 2 Tats1 aPwaNS cqmm 9l.737 13 066 294,967 2S7.7b6 1a~ome (!o") toqo opasoma 1S.126 65216 "s 81,917 Odm In e (exp~) hvnumt (nooMe 570 1,I70 1r665 7.232 owom {4.169} (4~5) (16.064) (12,554) Gam (bes) on svc of fixw opaa 378 43 296 (61) Odwr . QU 410 m ~ Iocome (lot* bNm' oa~ae mues 71.?A4 62,634 10,0i3 7p,555 owk (p+ovisaoo) for moome mep C~tl pS,931) Q3?M a92~11) Net ioti0me (1m) 41663 36,103 &~157 40 Bmk webbeed svettige d~ "=nibL 34.303A2 33136111 s7 3_~i.ib,120 3318~4 S9x . DW0 emonp Pgr camm aen 31.21 $1.10 137 S1.Z3 ~~SVMV Amm mmuft ]753.067 16 16 34 1811 Di~d ewoiag~ per co~os rh~~e $1jo 51_97 s~,?s 5321 Otixr p~ Rzswt C13b Flow 97.63= 77.252 123,643 1 Q3,970 RootEBITDA 55,09# 75,416 I19,330 100„451 x~?~o~maor~~ 420 (sM 9,728 AwGmq"n&e OwAons. fer Oe mine Msei Pqiad Wd1e AW)0. I W a%slaaes SU eiiibm dmp bwunrd do~lo~ 1rt ~tiod. 2) ho ~a naott~ fbr rie ~e +qi11uIM ~i0i 1~~ ~S M~ 30.1q47 apa~e ia u'9uld~ep arB~,f~e se ~CeywmA~o ~ak ~nd Wa's RO eeaoea a~c be~, pf~ f~y~ PI~ ~~dna die aplr~ ~inwl~ 8.1997 ~e~iodo. ~ ape ~ewua~? L99! II'0 i~e, ~ 7*.,1~hs far ~o u~e a,a+~liC wo~ pa1o~1 ~,1pn'13o.1l~t 6d6a. *e nmft ofde sied~.:dac i3~ltoe~ at Lo~e ~ Vdl..~i dK ~ s ~~~~arrs~oalvs.oqhWiah a.rs,roq~ar ~.1997.01116m % 1997, mod]mrry 1s.1991. -IDOt~ 1 . ,,JUN, 3. 1996 9.12AM UR PUBIIC RElATIONS NQ, 7357 P. 4/5 vail ReaOM Im Comolidafed Fiaexid ShMmob . (m fivememb oedoilm aoept pwddee exemb} -AC1'UAL-' ' Uaudiood Umudw MgLjjonft " 3 3cvea s F.t?ded =il 3 T 1997 399r i, 9 r, NeeRa++eptua ~ 1706051 144,,705 310,244 229,177 RMl sspmc ' 912 im 55905 6= NetR~ro~l~as 173,963 148,312 3650549 282,115 OPWAIPC Eqnm • gcswt ' VA13 67.453 1790G7 121,547 ~emu 3292 4.133 47.501 47A60 • C~m mpem I,544 1,766 3AQ7 7ti140 DWpmviodon dC Inmwtf=fm 114~U 4,781 2S 136 1_8.129 737 8.3 4133 mam a9976 la~ (laos) fiam opemoms 75,276 65,179 110,372 9$i39 Ofi~ ~coeae {expedss) : im?esenmt mco~e - 570 696 1,275 S63 laoet= aqmx t41W t73~4) t12.96Z) tlZ,7l9) Crdn (1as) an ave of Sxed aaaob 373 (10) 378 (35) °ma' LUI a:o QUI "5 bmw (low) bdom mmim 71= 581"3 9t741 10,793 Credk 6e*vsl* 6or *-Hoamc teocas 41 ~ ~yq6) 3 p Nr[ moo~ne (loss} 4~ 3~ ..75 Hatie we%bed avorme ' sham oua=dbg 34 38't 32,967,M 34.163,916 76 07B Bmdc cmbV Per om=m abrne , $121 S~1.05 S1.49 Sias Mood'vegt°d'rocr4cc 34 79 067 34~SIIIr gq,,6q~.412 rJ.9~4S~296 Dd7~mod wramgs per opmmoo shue 31.20 $'1.69 O&a Data Rom cub Flow 57,638 77= 110,817 107.630 RoMP81TDA K094 7sr4f6 127.610 104y790 ~evl ssta Operatmg Ioceme 620 ~ 7,304 6,173 i ; qAtod mdn ae w..e on vsp'a swwt ycl~ 411111S (Um u ji+n1ar 30 b 1o{r si ym aie ua..ood 4wtr&-.ba s, i09y. Aoooerqft. erc Cmpws raar ymewe Np di r*3s, l4il.oi oo~e a~ oa e~o~e~ pai.alom owe~r 1,107 4 7oq.;4 190e. rWmqwmw, POPOOmr vO fsmiagmudoa oe¦nes a erelve wwmb Giod „ae begineamAnme i. l!!7 m1 awaglayr 31,1m. 2) t1r dlclWA1 w01MG Parivd muftApR 341l4T LWndC 8mdm{fd/0 ¦Id !Clyfle=lar me 117 ftpmoed i~,Tmus!' 46 1l97 M11Ri ~ 1'A'13? hrft,ncxmaSoes.ronmraift~aWMgApd 3a 3M bmivdodp .amh.cdies-*no++p mmmmaft Lodp =wt .a eo I= . ~a~e to~ mar ~eeqre,a~dden aw, aroee~6e.1.1991, owo6~ $~9gr. ~a r~, ~s, t~. I . -m01r'r - . . ~ . . - . . . • . _ ; , . .JUN, 3. 1998 9:12AM---,°UR PUBI,IC REI,ATIONS . N0, 7357-_ P. 5/5 vail Rosols, Iac. . , 5upptememmt Dm fm mouamir,f ; 3Q 98 3 % yrn 98 Y'1'D 97 X Tr•~ Roamt R~wes (Pv Fmma) ~ Lift 7'idCet S n,SZ3 ; S 7j,955 8.696i $146,458 aI34y954 S.5l6 ~ md Sobm1 4115 20.U6 917i 38,639 34r436 12296, Daiqg 23,769 20o570 iS.6y6 45,492 38.234 202°K 10,136 14.1% 19,727 166417 202% ~ Hospi~lity 19,709 . 13,540 45.6'K 39,057 28.680 36.2% Odet 11,799 5.504 114.4% 34,342 2A072 71.176 Tota! ~LaWrt . 517~1 : SI~TOS ] S3Z !95 Sxa~~ ( TaRal ffiIdar V6ib 2.565 ~ ~g9~.~ 4.706 4,335 -7'K Tota1 I Sm~ Smnr v-witi Tota! Sieuwti skier Ylnft % CLa~ Y997." 1996-97 - ~ Vau ~ 1,597,932 1,667,039' (5_3%) Bmk~enaid~c ; 1,300~883 11341,174 (3-0%) Keys(ow 1,149,27p 1,217,154 (5.6%) Beaver Cm& 668,520 644,456 3.7% 4,71605 4j889,828 . ('3_5%) ~ ~ • . - , _ , . TOWN COUNCIL COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE APPOINTMENTS TO: Town Council FR: Pam Brandmeyer DA: June 3, 1998 RE: Committee/Task Force Aopointments This is a list of all committees/task forces to which Council members have been appointed or for which they have volunteered. It is my understanding that all assignments run to the next Regular Municipal Election, November 1999. I COMMITTEE(fASK FORCE COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. NWCCOG Sybill Navas 2. NWCCOG Water Quality/ Sybill Navas Quantity Committee 3. Vail Valley Tourism & Mike Arnett & Convention Bureau Rob Ford, alternate (formerly VRA) 4. CAST Bob Armour Bob McLaurin 5. VRD/Council Subcommittee Kevin Foley Ross Davis Rob Ford Chris Moffett 6. Special Evenis Committee Sybill Navas 7. Bravo! Colorado Board Mike Jewett MichaelArnett 8. Eagle County Recreation Rob Ford Authority Ludwig Kurz 9. Town of Vail Housing Authority Michael Arnett 10. Channel5 Vail Valley Community Television Board Ludwig Kurz 11. Vail Valley Arts Council Ludwig Kurz 12. Art In Public Places Sybill Navas Rob Ford I 13. Mauri Nottingham Environmental Michael Arnett Award 14. Vail Valley Exchange/Sister Cities Sybill Navas, Mike Jewett 15. Eagle Counry Regional Transportation Kevin Foley Authority Rob Ford, Alternate 16. Ford Park Management Plan Roh Ford 17. The Chamber Sybill Navas 18. Open SpacelCharter Committee Sybill Navas 19. Colorado Ski Museum and Ski Hall of Fame Ludwig Kua 20. Town of VailNail Associates Task Force Rob Ford Mike Amett 21. Eagle Valley Leadership Coalition Rob Ford I 22 Mountain Crew Tom Moorhead 23. Vail Youth Recognition Award Sy6ill Navas C ITCAPPTS.LST Town of Vail Sales Tax Worksheet 6/2/98 x cna.ge x aa,ge i9s9 tfudget nom nom Month 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Budget Collecfbns Vadanee 1997 Budgef :•:r»:~ :...............:•>::a::;;;;:;w:;.s:>;r:r::a':'-"'.~::::::::: , : :.,:.,.'-:~;:;::i::s:r?::: •:r:: r;:;<::::::.~::::.:~::.~::.r;:::::::::::::::::::.~:: ~>x.: r.:: r•;:-r• t::rz:::.'•::: r •w:•>•:::•>::~• . . . . i:i•'::~;i;::Si::%rr::;::?.':ir•"r.2;i::r.r:~r:::::'•:;:::i;~:.';~2`;~'~:;t::;::-3~':;~s::::i:::::r:::::r:'::::;::;:';;:;i:~:2~:~~;;;i:''r.;5:;i;~'r':'•:r::::;i;;::::::::;~:::;':_::;;:::;:i.:;:%:;;::.;:••;• : •::~•::::::;;;;w:: ~•:w;r;;r:;:;::::::::;:::.:r:::..: ,''.Si•': - - Janua 1,063,1961,126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,855,364 1,805,707 1,894,597 1,935,782 2,052,569 2,076,931 2,104,436 27,505 2.53% 1.32% February 1,135,7861,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,828,766 1,814,495 1,816,107 1,993,389 2,089,673 2,121,757 2,145,684 23,927 2.68% 1.13% March 1,378,7821,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 1,988,090 2,250,656 2,139,298 2,240,865 2,580,992 2,614,841 2,348,373 (266,468) -9.01% -10.19% April 425,961 550,205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 864,303 794,668 791,092 966,993 874,427 881,575 1,054,544 172,969 20.60% 19.62% Total 4,003,725 4,473,507 5,534,598 5,826,865 6,118,902 6,159,380 6,536,523 6,665,526 6,641,094 7,137,029 7,597,661 7,695,104 7,653,037 -42,067 0,73% -0.55% Ma 245,518 170,567 215,548 236,359 250,809 268,000 257,248 287,315 324,681 318,920 329,783 328,723 June 331,581 329,039 393,470 448,227 468,948 468,598 475,161 548,820 590,685 594,907 630,366 642,504 July 479,201 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 811,538 892,830 893,483 963,717 1,043,637 1,060,879 Au ust 536,904 575,887 668,119 678,071 761,992 767,257 825,954 891,566 867,125 990,650 1,073,430 1,090,762 September 442,402 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 645,902 630,453 637,831 642,504 October 273,951 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367,578 400,525 408,405 461,791 413,573 472,836 478,142 November 386,270 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 497,907 553,681 594,491 611,147 601,208 707,166 717,214 December 1,245,612 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,775 1,846,223 1,974,553 1,992,855 1,994,540 2,068,851 2,254,709 2,286,119 Total 7,945,164 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,603,647 12,395,718 13,007,013 13,030,448 13,719,308 14,747,419 14,941,951 7,653,037 -42,067 ? APRIL APRIL YTD YTD • 03Jun-98 DOLLAR PERCENT DOLLAR PERCENT APRIL 1998 1997 1998 YTD 97 YTD 98 CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE Vail Village- Retail 165,361 224,271 58,910 35.63% 0 ERR Vail Village - Lodging 98,199 132,353 34,154 34.78% 0 ERR Vaii Village - Food & Beverage 120,694 146,483 25,789 21.37% 0 ERR Vail Viilage - Other 5,183 5,765 582 1123% 0 ERR 389,437 508,872 0 0 119,435 30.67% 0 ERR Lionshead - Retail 80,033 94,676 14,643 18.30% 0 ERR Lionshead - Lodging 69,338 76,887 7,549 10.89% 0 ERR Lionshead - Food 8 Beverage 50,647 48,261 (2,386) -4.71 % 0 ERR Lionshead - Other 4,611 5,722 1,771 24.09% 0 ERFi 204,629 225,546 0 0 20,917 1022% 0 ERR ~ . Other Areas - Retail 90,197 115,658 25,461 28.23% 0 ERR Other Areas - Lodging 42,560 56,664 14,104 33.14% 0 FRR Other Areas - Food & Beverage 28,907 26,394 (2,513) -8.69% 0 ERR Other Areas - Other 6,767 7,400 633 9.35% 0 ERR 168,431 206,116 0 0 37,685 22.37% 0 ERR Out - Retail 22,092 15,479 (6,613) -29.93% 0 ERR Out - Lodging 630 289 (341) -54.13% 0 ERR Out - Food 8 Beverage 750 0 (750) -100.00% 0 ERR Out - Other 86,789 98,225 11,436 13.18% 0 ERR total for out of town 110,261 113,993 0 0 3,732 3.38% 0 ERR TOTAL FOR APRIL 1998 REPORT 872,758 1,054,527 0 0 181,769 20.83% 0 ERR TOTAL-RETAIL 357,683 450,084 0 0 92,401 25.83% 0 ERR TOTAL-LODGE 210,727 266,193 0 0 55,466 26.32% 0 ERR TOTAL-FOOD 200,998 221,138 0 0 20,140 10.021% 0 ERR TOTAL-OTHER 103,350 117,112 0 0 13,762 13.321% 0 ERR GRAND TOTAL 872,758 1,054,527 0 0 181,769 20.83% 0 ERR 1,054,527 0 x C • G~~t~Ci,L 44,P LL4~ ~ ~ Rob Ford, Mayor 2765 Bald Mountain Road Vail, Colorado 81657 ` Dear Mayor: . We are happy real estate owr.ers in Eas d Vai-1 wha are growing concerned about the drastic changes which appeay to be t-aking piace- or are at-out to take place- in the `Iail "a".ley. ~Ole would li-ke ro :--c on record as opposing h:gh rise cuild"Lr.gs in t-his delightiul mour.tain resor-tl area. We also -feel opDositian to the use of open space lands and mor.ies ior affordabie employee hOllSl:ig• - Piease ;*IOVe Wltr extreme C3LltlOri Wrere cnar.ge car.not b@ reversec. Sir.cerely, ' aan N . Wa:ido 0 w~hite 'I~arm Ro India.na, PA. 15701 May 28, 1998 I Printed by Pam Brandmeyer 6/03/98 4:04pm From: Pam Brandmeyer To: Pam Bra Subject. SLIGHT ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PAID PARKING CALENDAR AT FORD PARK Hello Councilmembers! So you know. ..there have been three changes as of this morning: Wednesday, June 10 Previously PAID MANAGED PARKING Cancelled - the corporate group is now going to be bused to the Amphitheatre w/drop offs at Manor Vail and the Vail Nature Center Saturday, June 20 Previously PAID MANAGED PARKING Cancelled - the Children's Hospi- tal Fundraising Concert at the Amphitheatre has been cancelled Saturday, July 25 The NEW DUBLINERS have been scheduled to perform at the Amphitheatre so this will become a PAID MANAGED PARKING night This means the next PAID MANAGED PARKING will now be Tuesday, June 16, w/the multiple users the adult softball program and HOT SUMMER NIGHTS! FYI: Paqe: 1 r From: Chamber of Commerce To: Suzanne Silverthom Date: 6/5/98 Time: 6:51:30 AM Page 1 of 1 The L? CHAMBER. Of Commerce Have Lunch with the Chamber at Choparral, on Wednesday, June lOth Politics as usual? Not if the Colorado Association of Cornrnerce. and Industry (CACI) and The Chamber of Cornrnerce have their way. As part of CACT's 1998 El.ection Initiative "Colorado Election'98: Choices for the 21' Century", The Charnber of Commerce will host an educational and planning interactive session on Wednesday, June 10, 1998. The day will begin with n luncheon from noon to 2:00 p. m. at Chapnrral Restnurunt at the Cordillera Vnlley Club. During the luncheon, Sam Cassidy, CACI President and CEO, will address ballot initiatives that are potentially dangerous to Colorado businesses and the Colorado econorny as a whole. The event will continue with a policy cornrnittee rneeting at the Charnber at 2:30 p.m. and a candidate debate between Representative Jack Taylor and his opponent, Jarnes Johnson, structured and rnoderated by Mr. Cassidy at 6:30 p.m. The debate is free and members and guests are strongly encouraged to attend. Cost for the luncheon is $20.00 for members, with advnnce reservafions, $25.00 at the door nnd $30.00 for non-members. Please cnll with n credit cnrd to mnke n lunch reservntion by Monday, June 8th at 949-5189. If you're planning to nttend and hnven't let us know, plense do so ASAP so we cnn be sure we'll hnve enough lunches for everyone. r . b<,~., i " . , ?cc , T C :~roln~'~ ; a~g~ ~~R?~~tly,'~y, ~~w Gove rnor sig ns marketing bill By Sarah S. Chung levying a tax on lodging facilitics. trict would go a long way in ciisU-ih- Daily SwH Writer All the parameters of: What area uting the marketing cost more equi- The choice of Colorado commu- will compose the district, how much tably between towns and the county. nities to establish marketing dis- the tax will be, and how it will be He also feels a stable source of tricts is now the law of the land. administered is all up to local vot- finance would greatly enhance the With the Govenor's signature still erS, marketing ot the arca's non-ski sea- fresh on the authori•r,ing document, "lt's all in local hands," Taylor son opportunities. the sponsar of the measure says the said', "Obviously I'm very pleased," bill became law because "it just I m delighted because this will Johnson said. "This legislation real- makes sense." give a lot of communities an impor- ly creates an opportunity to begin to "It's exciting news that it's a tant tool, particularly on the West- develop a meaningful funding done deal," said State Rep. Jack ern Slope," said Kate Carey, mechanism for the tourism econo- Taylor, R-Steamboat Springs, who President of the Chamber of Com- my." wrote the bill."It means a lot of inerce."It didn't look like it was Whether or not (or how) a ques- good things for a lot of communities going to make it a couple of times tion to establisli a loca( marketing but honestly, I think it was concert- district woald appear in this Nov.'s and there are so many checks and ed grassroots lobbying that made a ballot will be determined in the next. balances that I don't think it can be difference. It's encouraging to feel few weeks. misused at all." that legislators still listen ro us." Sarah Chieng cnve.rs Engle The marketing district legislation Frank Johnson, President of Vail Corrnty, the toivn qFEagle, aiid edir- allows a community to vote [o raise Valley Tourism and Convention cntion. She c;niv be reached nt (970) money for tourism campaigns by Fiureau, asserts that a markeling dis- 949-0555, ext. 615. ~ ~ ' ~ FROM : SCOTT SHEARWOOD HOMES I NC PHONE N0. : 970 328 6830 JLH. 05 1998 11: 29A('1 P2 June 5, 1998 To: All Eagle County Town Mayors, Managers and Town Councilmen From: ACT (Alliance of Citizens for Tomarrow) Re: Meeting Monday, June 8, 1998 at Christie Lodge, Avon You are all cardially invited to a meeting Monday evening at the Christie Lodge in Avdn at 7:00 P.M. to discuss major development issues regarding all of L•^agle county. Topics to be discussed will include open space, land use regulations, White River National Forest plan as we11 as review of spme of the major development proposals being considered at this time. Informative updates regarding CAT III, future of the Eagle River, as well as the up- coming County Gommissi.oner election should be of interest to everyone. , We hope you can attend; it should be an interesting and inform- ative evening. Sincerely, -7 Rosie Shearwood Alliance of Citizens for Tomorrow (ACT) Coaunitted to Smart Growth for the future of Eagle County. 328-683Q „ ~y TOWN OF VAIL ~ Office of the Town Manager 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 . . . . 970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 TM June 8, 1998 Mr. Paul Testwuide Sr. Vice President and COO Vail Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 7 Vail, CO 81658 Dear Paul: As you aze probably aware, we had been working with Vail Associates on a project to upgrade the Vista Bahn ski yard. This project involves regrading and installation of heated pavers, to better define the ski yard. A portion of this project will be constructed in the pathway between Curtin Hill Sports and the Golden Peak Building and wili tie to the Town of Vail's Seibert Circle project. Although you and I have not had a chance yet to talk about this project, I have been working with Jim Mandel and Brian McCartney on this project. Because there are some jurisdictional questions regarding this area, I wanted to formally state the Town's position. The area in question is located on land owned by the U.S. Forest Service and is part of the permit which Vail Associates holds to operate the ski area. This area was also annexed into the Town several years ago. The position of the U.S. Forest Service is that the annexation was conducted without the authorization of U.S. Farest Service officials and therefore is not valid. Because the U.S. Forest Service believes the annexation invalid, they object to the Town of Vail exercising it's jurisdiction over U.S. Forest Service lands. For your information I have attached a letter from Bill Woods concerning this matter. The area in question is in fact scheduled to be de-annexed as part of the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement recently signed by the Town of Vail and the U.S. Forest Service. However, the area in qnestion is currently within the corporate limits of the Town of Vail and the Town believes it has some responsibility for development review in this area. In order to satisfy the concerns of both the U.S. Forest Service and Vail Associates, the Town of Vail would be willing to allow this project to go to the Design Review Board (DRB) as a courtesy review. In other words, Vail Associates would submit this application to the Town and the project would be reviewed by TOV staff and the DRB as an informal review. Obviously, if we have serious concerns about the L~ RECYCLEDP.4YER specifics of the design we will work with the U.S. Forest Service to make sure that our concerns are incorporated into a formal review. We should sit down over the next few weeks with Brian McCartney and the Town Engineer to review the specifics of this proposal so that we can have this project ready for a early fall construction. Please feel free to call me at 479-2105 if you have questions or need additional information. Paul, I look forward to working with you on this and many other matters in the future. Sincerely, IF VAIL TO' Robert W. McLaurin Town Manager RWM/aw xc: Jim Mandel, Esquire Brian McCartney Larry Grafel R. Thomas Moorhead, Esquire Greg Hall Todd Oppenheimer Vail Town Council RECEIVED JUN 8 lggg Request For Distribution May 26, 1998 Dear Club 20 Member, Please find enclosed a letter from Club 20 Board Members Gary Sprung, Fritz Diether, Steve Schechter, and Art Goodtimes, responding to the recently released Club 20 "Decline of the Aspen" publication. Would you please be kind enough to copy and/or distribute our letter to your colleagues, assaciates, Board members, staff members, etc.? We would greatly appreciate your help in this matter. J f~ ` Fritz Diet r ~ I _ i Steve Schechter GarY S g Art Goodtimes Enc.: letter . ~ . Club 20 Gunnison County Board Members Gary Sprung, Fritz Diether, and Steve Schechter Club 20 San Migucl County Board Member Art Goodtimes 981 County Road 20 , Gunnison, CO $1230 May 26,1998 . Dear Club 20 Member, Club 20's recent publicarion "Decline of the Aspen" has generated a fot of interest in forest management throughout Colorado. We think that's good. It makes us all think about our relationship to, and our use of, public forest lands. The Gunnison and San Miguel County Club 20 Board of Directors Representatives . agree with some points made by the Club 20 Report, including the reality that there is a growing potential of wildfires in Colorado's forests caused by decades of fire prevenrion, and that cazeful timber harsrest can help minimize forest fuels in ways that reduce fire hazarrd. We also support Club 20's obsesvation that the federal budget process is often a major impedimer+t to si:sttainable forest mam-igement. However, we find several main points of the Repori to be overly simplistic or scientifically unsubstantiated. A Complex Problem The Club 20 publication quotes forester Marion Clawson saying, "timber growth is a function of timber harvest. "(9) This implies that forests cannot grow without our assistance> a theory that eons of earth history has adequately disproven. Forests are natural systems containing a myriad of interrelationships, which we are only beginning to understand. Regardless of tree species in questioq we find the notion that "trees must be cut to grow" to be overly simplistic. Economics The Report states that "the Forest Service allocates few resources" to timber management, and calls for more funding for timber harvests.(11) In fact, the largest portion of the current Forest Service budget ($401 million) is for timber sales and vegetative management. (Source: USDA FY 1997 Expenditures). The Report also asserts that forest management is guided mare by "financially efficient returns to the government" than by anytlung else, and implies that if the agency were not so intent on providing moneys to the federal treasury, it could do a better job of managing forest resources. This statement is not borne out by the facts. Timber sales have been a net loser on National Forests for many years. Last year, the Forest Service issued its first "official" admission that it lost money on timber sales nationally. The Report emphasizes the reliance of timber companies and communities on a sustainable flow of forest products from National Foresis. However, federal timber presently contributes a small amount (5-101/6) of the nation's annual wood fiber supply. In addition, Forest Service stadstics clearly show that recreational uses of National Forests contribute far more than timber production (74% versus 2.7%). We agree that many people come to Colorado expressly to view aspen in,their fall glory. We disagree that intensive harvesting of these forests makes economic sense. ~ The Aspen "Crisis" The Club 20 Report suggests that there is a crisis in aspen forests in western Colorado. Colorado State Forester 7ames Hubbard is quoted as stating, "if the U S Forest Service policy remains on its current course, the State of Colorado will lose most of its famed aspen trees within 40 to 50 years." (14). While we agree with the fact that many aspens are a seral species subject to successional processes, we also nate that recent research coming from the Forest Service and other professionals indicates that some aspen clones maintain themselves indefinitely. Forest Service research notes that "Climax aspen communities occur throughout the West", noting that "such stable stands that are able to persist for several centuries without appreciable change should be considered at least de facto climax, and should be managed as stable vegetation types.", + ( FS GTM RM-119, p. 45) Unforcunatelq,.silviculriue has not progressed to the stage where foresters can easily tell the difference between a successional stand and a climax stand. We agree that, due to natural forest processes, the next 50 years may likely bring a decline in the overall amount of aspen forest in Colorado. We strongly disagree that immediate, intensive logging will prevent this situation from occurring, or that a campaign of the kind Club 20 proposes will lead to improved "forest health" in the aspen forest type. Forest Health It is unclear what is meant by the term "forest health" as used in the Report We agree that forest health is a concern, but not in aspen. Aspen aze actually among Colorado's healthiest forest types. In far warse shape . aze the ponderosa type forests, particulazly along the Front Range. Yet the Report states "continuing the status quo in the West means large portions of Colorado's colorful aspen will continue to decline, resultutg in an unhealthy forest ecosystem" which will be further exacerbated by "the unhealthy presence of disease and insects throughout the forests" ( 20) There is no scientific research eited in the Report or lrnown to exist which suggests that 1) the presence of insects and disease are by themselves indicators of forest "unhealth", or that 2) intensive logging of aspen stands wilI lead to a more "healthy" forest. Indeed, according to Conservation Biologist Michael Sou1e, a healthy forest is a diverse ecosystem that contains representation of all potential vegetation types and their seral stages, has viable populations of top carnivores, rare and sensitive species and is large enough to accommodate all of the natural d.isturbances ta which a forest is prone. (Sould 3/2/98) Intensive logging of aspen as proposed in the Club 20 Report will produce negative impacts to biological forest health, the most damaging being new road construction, inuoduction of noxious weeds and increased soil erosion. These impacts will lead directly to loss of unroaded habitat, reduced or changed recreational opportuniries, eradication of native plants, and decline in water quality. For these reasons, we believe the Club 20 Report confi3ses economic health of the community with the biological reality of forests. Science ' Although the Club 20 Report makes repeated references to its well-founded scientific underpinnings, there is little in the bibliography to suggest that this is the case. Inforniation used to bolster the Report's ~ contentions is simply not found in the document. With the exception of one article cited fram The Journal of Forestry, there are no references from a reputable peer-reviewed science journal after 1979. We do not feel that the authors have provided evidence of knowledge of the scientific literature on aspen ecology. Conclusion - We feel that the Report is a good starting point for discussion. The Gunnison and San Miguel County Board Representarives support local use of forest products in a way that contributes to a diverse economy and biologically healthy forests. Because we believe that Club 20 must desire the same things, we look _ forward to discussing the issue of aspen forest management with these goals in mind. We are concerned about who funded the k'iub 20 Aspen Repart and whether it is an unbiased scientific report. The Club 20 board of directors and membership must given full financial accounting of who paid for this publication, the authors, and a how much it cost. :'hen a;l a: us would tzave a betier :dea cf why this steidy was ever conceived and how seriously it should believed. Sincerely, ~ - Steven C. Schechter - ~ - Gary Sprung G Fritz Diether Art Goodtimes l~tC~1 , t MARCH 1998 „ VAIL B U S INE S S Tou~v oF vA~, REVIEW June 4, 1998 The March Vail Business Review examines March 'sales tax collections for all filers and year to date collections through March 1998. Overall March sales tax decreased 8.9% with Retail decreasing 8.3%, Lodging decreased 9.9%, Food and Beverage decreased 9.3% and Other (which includes items such as utilities, taxable services i.e. plumbing and electrical and rentals or leases) decreased 4.4%. Year to date collections through March 1998 resulted in a 1.7% decrease overall with Retail decreasing 1.6%, Lodging decreased 3.1 Food and Beverage decreased 1.1 % and Other increased 4.5%. March Events Included 1997 1998 Paul Mitchell American Ski Classic Bailey's American Ski Classic Chevy Truck International Ski Festival Henry Weinhard's Mogul Mania Downhill World Championships UnVailed Rolex Junior Olympics Warsteiner Mogul Mania UnVailed Easter was in April in 1998 and in March in 1997. Please remeinb-er when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax collections, as opposed to actual gross sales. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125 or Steve Thompson at (970) 479-2116. Sincerely, Sally Lorton Sales Tax Administrator MARCH SALES TAX - VAIL VILLAGE MARCH MARCH MARCH 1997 1998 % Collections Coliections Chan e , _ , _ . . . . . ; ~ k,. _ . . . . . _ . . : . . . , , 9in t : . . eta' , - R I . . . . ~ . . r' ; Lod9in : : ; ; ~ . . ~ 9 . ~ , < , . . . . : . , . . : . . _ ~ , , . . : _ ~ . . . ; _ . _ _ , : , . .t., , . . Food & . _ . . _ . . ~ . . , ~ . . , , . ~ . . . , . . . . , , , , ; . , . . B ever a9e , ; . . h ~.b_ _ . , _ . . . . , k.~ , _ , . . . .......~;-'~;c:... _ +;..,i . :.~..~.i . ..q,`,:,.;:-= ...e . . .'t . ~ . . . . , ~...v... . . . y. . ......3 . . . 4........ . . . , a... . . . . . . , „ , . „ . . . . ...::;.r'r:i.'-' . . , . . + . . . , : . . ~ . _ , . . Other , _ ~ . . ~ . . _ ; , : . . . , . . . ~ , . . . , ~ . . . . _ . . . , . . . . 38-0'°`~< T otal , _ _ . , . . LIONSHEAD MARCH MARCH MARCH 1997 1998 % - Collections Collections Chan e . . . t- . _ . , . ; _ . . , . . R ; , . . : etai I . . : - . . . . . . : _ . ; , . . > . :...y,.;., ; . . . . _ . „ . . . . . _ : . . , . . . ~ . L od in ~ . `"1~` 9 ~t~~;; 9 ~ ~ ~ . . . F ood & . : . . . _ <; , . . . . . . _ . ; _ . . . , . e , . . . : . B ev r e a .S g , ~~`~38 t:.., _ . . . : = Other ~ . _ . _ . , . . . , _ , . . . _ . . , ; . , 4.... . . . _ . , , . . . . ~ . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , : , _ _ , _ . . . . . . ..:i.x...... . : T o taI : . . . . . , _ . . , . ~ . . , _ . k.. _ . . . ~ k.; , . . ~ , . , . . . , ~ . MARCH SALES TAX ~ CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIL/SANDSTONE/WEST VAIL MARCH MARCH MARCH 1997 1998 % Collections Coilections Chan e , .s ~ , . . , . . , . , ~ . . . . a ~"1... ' R il eta , : . . + ~ ..a.,.; ~ - !i , . . . . . . . . :.._t: . . . . . . . ; ' . ' . . . , ~ . . . . . , . . , „ ` . . . , . . . c:; ::.,>a•.;>,,.;..,.,,;:d: ' . . . ; : . - . . ~ , , ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~y ~~"'*`ni}'~ti~.~:,'.~~i,:+:~,:u,~.~ap'n~:;.J•+iii+~~' YC44~%'~~:V . 9in9 . 1.,..4, L R od : . _ . : _ . . >_::-...:t.~~ks,:~~~ . . . . . . . . . . .r'r; - , . . ,......._,.;;:...~<..;....-~e.~ . . . . . . . . . . _ . . , . .....•~~:..:...::':i, ~ 4 ' . . . . . . .4.,. , , , - ..y:,,:.,... , . .n.+ . .a.,_..'~:,-ii.:.. , , ~ . , a .u . . . ...aa ~ a... ,u..,.-..:.:~~ . . ~ . . . . . .:y . , .,,,:a , ....'~t ..,:i. ~ n4 tYV i F ood ~ & . : , . . . B evera9e , . . . ~ . , . . . _ , . _ . . . _ . . . ; . , , . . , r..,.. -•;:..an':~'.'~ . , e.. ..i..., a no..:.."., i , . . .....•.~v.:~~> . ...-:...:".:.i . . r.~. . . . . , , . r . . . . . . . . . ' _ _ i:~..~'::.t . ........-.a.. , . ~S. - . , . . x ...........,.,....a.. , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ , . . . , . . . . . . . ~ > . . . . , . . . , . . , . . „i. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , , . „ . . , . . . . , 'i . . . , , . . .....:.,::::i.:y:i .,•.~.:.:4`5~;: . . .+r , . ...~`it..~ ~ . ~ , , . . . . .......h:,...;... - : a,~ . . . - . , . . . . . . . . ...:;;a..' . . . . , . ,...,-ei: . . . . . " . . . ; Other , ~ ~ _ . . . ~ . . , . . . _ _ . . ~ , . . , - . . , ~ . . . . : , t: . . , . . T I , . . : ota . . . _ _ . . . _ _ : . . ~ . . - - - . . _ _ . ; . . . . . . . . . . . OUT OF TOWN MARCH MARCH MARCH 1997 1998 % ~ Collections Collections Chan e 77777 . . . . . ..o . : . ; . . . , , : . . ~ . R il - eta ~i~ . . . ~ . . ~ ~~ti; - . : . , . . . . . ~z~..b:,;; . . ,:,:,,,c; ~ e~. . ".7r:•-~ . . . . . . . , , , .....t , . . . . . . . , . „ . . . . , _ : , : ~ ~ L od9in 9 . ° . _4.. . . . , . . . . . ~ . . F O od & . . , ; . ;~~.;:5., . . . . . . . . ~ . B . . , : evera9e . , ~ ^ . _ . _ . . . , ~ . . : . a:..r::::.:.,;.:.'.;. - _ . > ;..a;, . . . ,..,s::;:~ . , : :<:_'.s:';.,. . ~ .,.h..,. , ,...,a...,,,,...,,.,.,.... . . . , . y . : u.; . . . . . . . . . . .,,..,,.x::,-..~..:••y;.~'..: . .a... ~ . . : _.:..:i:-.:i,i}Y:,~~'h:;:;.;'-.':.,. . ~ , ; , . , . Other . . . . . . , , . ..a,_ . . ; e . . . . . . . . . . ...r..:.,: . . . a... . :.n::~-' . . „ . , . ^~o.x:';;.,. a . . . :..~a . . . :::;.:c. ' .5w „a., , . . . . ...~..a.~.,~,.._ . ~ : _ . . :..r:.r.,;__ . . . . . . . . ~ . b. }.':ne ~ . . - ,.;,,j.. + a ....4. - n . ....r.., ,.._:a ~:....~.:._c. ~ . , " .....;.^,:"i::. , . . :'.i...,,. . , . „ „ . . . . . . . . c . . . , . .::i>:: . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . , . . ._:;...e ........::...o. , , : . ' ~ . . . . . . „ i>::.:~ . , . . .u...~ . . . . . . :.t. . , ~ _ . . . ~ . , . . . , . . . . . ~ . , . . . . . ; . ~ . T I ~ ota . , . . _ . ~ MARCH SALES TAX ~ TOTAL MARCH MARCH MARCH 1997 1998 % Collections Collections Chan e , . . . . . . _ _ . . , . 3 Ret il a ~ : : k... . ` ~ : L0d9in : : 9 1~.. . . , <t; t F & 0d 0 . . : . _ . , r Be a ve9e . . , ~ . . . . . , . . . . . . . . : ~.Y.;~..: , . _ ~ . . , _ . , . , , . ~ _ . . , . . . . . _u ~ ~ _ . ; _ . . : . : . . : .o.~.. . . . ...s~ k:;oy„ ~ ....r..,.,, s,... „ . „ .i42..,,.,. a.. o.,.:e., n. . ..~1,. .F._ . . ,r..,,. . . . . . , . ......t.~:.. . . . ' ' . . . . . - , _.ia. ~ ' . •;;;:::~:_''_.a, ...:..:::..:...::::~.:n : - , . . , :O . ~ . h r te ~ . . 43 . . . . . - - . _ ':%ik;;:.:,•.~;",~~:v . Tota' 2 560 , , . . - - - - - RETAIL SUMMARY MARCH MARCH MARCH 1997 1998 % COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE FOOD 124,644 147,615 18.4% ' LIQUOR 27,682 26,781 -3.3% APPAREL 144,235 118,800 -17.6% SPORT 398,653 348,419 -12.6% JEWELRY 34,695 33,290 -4.0% GIFT 34,876 28,450 -18.4% GALLERY 5,044 10,136 100.9% OTHER 102,093 87,023 -14.8% HOME 1,187 483 -59.3% OCCUPATION TOTAL 873,109 800,997 -8.3% 3/98 YTD SALES TAX - VAIL VILLAGE YTD YTD YTD 1997 1998 % Coilections Collections Chan e . . . Retail '124~,93~ 't,'I~!~~~Q ; . ~ : - . ; , , , ; , , . ; : . - 1. ` <;:;::;=; > : , 3~I9`~~~~ :.~;"~7~ 9 . . : . L in od 9 9 ~ ~ . ~ , _ : : : . ; -n~: . -;>,s;:. _ . . _ : . _ _ . . , . . . ~ . . : _ _ : . _ 00 & . ; F d . . , . . _ r _ i-„ : Bveae 9 ~ . ' ' ~o. e g~ ' ' ' : : ~ ` 9 3 : . , : _ . . . . . . _ _ _ ~ _ . _ . . . , ~36 ' Other - S. : . . ~ ~ . _ _ . ; v;t;:... ;.>~,o>:; > ;o_-. 3; ,9 . 2?`~`;-= = ; ; T otal ~J~l':;;;; , . ~ 494 ~ _ ~ . . . . ~ . ; . : . ~ : . ::;y: L/ONSHEAD YTD YTD YTD 1997 1998 % Collections Collections Chan e ; - _ _ , : - ; , , Retail ~~i~,~'#; , ; , . ` 48fl s~t~ : ; ; ' ::-~.~rg~~' , . - : . 3. - : . . . , . . . <.:,...:.,.:.::...<.,.,...::. , Lod in , , : 7~?fl 25~ : ~ : - ~ ; ; ~ : 9 9 - , ~9~~ S? -$,1..;~?. ~ F ood & , : > . - : . , ; , . . - - everage - - : ; . ; ; 258 J~8 ; - : , ~ _ , ; ~ - : ; ~ ; : ; . , . - Other . ~'~,~Oa - ~.~~~~9"~ , . . : .n;:~ _ _ . . ~ . . _ _ - . . , ; x. . . , . : . . : _ ~ : . , ; . - . T 1 : . . ; : . ~ . . . _ 1 : : 8 _ . ota ° _ ~ : ; ; - < . ~ ~ 6~ 7~~,>:;. , > . .~;~3~'~ _ ~ _ . _ _ ~ 3198 YTD SALES TAX CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIL/SANDSTONENVEST VAIL YTD YTD YTD 1997 1998 % Coilections Collections Chan e Retail ; ~ 4~ 1 ~i~' ' ~~2 2 15.5°.!~ , s , Lod9in9 614 , ool _ . . . Food & . . , . , Bevera9e '~59 _ . . . _ . . - . , , ~ , . . < : . , Other 25,955 ; .-1: T I ota ,'13 1 236~589 ~4 _ _ - , _ OUT OF TOWN YTD YTD YTD 1997 1998 % Callections Collections Chan e ~ ,.;:.,;.,:....:,.:...:.:..,......;..,.:..~,,<s,::;.,,:;.:>__:>.:...,....:.:.... ~ Retail = 6 27 Lodging : ~14 100 ; ~6r6 93 Food & B ver eage `3~ . ~::~.:;:.;:•?::;,;~7:.~. .,:>~~,:i::~:`:`. _:;,i::, i;,:<': ,%iJ~,';;.;;i':~;';`::~,.c.:>.::;~f.::,.,;f..,: . Other 32'~~'i9'~ A ° 6 T 1 ota ~31 4~8,9~8 . ~ . 3198 YTD SALES TAX ~ TOTAL YTD YTD YTD 1997 1998 % Collections Coliections Chan e . , , . Retail ' 2~2841781 ; 2,247.934 .6% ; - . , . Lod9in 2 F,3{ . 9 . . . , . , , _ d& F 00 Bevera9e , 331 686.:;;:::: j M. Other 4~15,~2 434,~tN~,;.,; . . . . > . Total = 5,724 934<>: ~:6,6,09.07$` , RETAIL SUMMARY MARCH MARCH MARCH 1997 1998 % COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE FOOD 345,739 404,484 17.0% LIQUOR 73,203 77,074 5.3% APPAREL 388,579 339,109 -12.7% SPORT 1,001,335 956,817 -4.4% JEWELRY 88,370 90,466 2.4% GIFT 93,181 85,212 -8.6% GALLERY 14,536 24,937 71.6% OTHER 276,277 268,386 -2.9% HOME 3,562 1,449 -59.3% OCCUPATION TOTAL 2,284,782 2,247,934 =1.6% ~ Y 6 Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657