Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1999-03-09 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 2:00 P.M. AT TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA NOTE: Time of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. Interview Applicants for One Vail Valley Marketing Board Position. (30 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review the attached letters of interest and interview applicants for one position on the Vail Valley Marketing Board. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: There is one open position on the Vail Valley Marketing Board with a term expiration date of December, 2000. This position will be appointed at the March 16th evening meeting. 2. DRB/PEC Report. (5 min.) George Ruther 3. Development Program for the A-Frame Site. (20 mins.) Russell Forrest Nina Timm ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review plan for the site and approve for inclusion in the RFQ. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Prior to issuing the Request for Qualifications for a single development team for the Garmisch/Arosa park and housing development and the A-Frame redevelopment, staff is requesting that Council approve the general development program for the A-Frame site. Council approve the development program for the Garmisch/Arosa site on January 12. Based on the input from Council, staff will modify the program or proceed with the RFQ process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed program as submitted. 4. 5. New Lionshead Zone Districts, Ordinance No. 3, Series of Dominic Mauriello 1999 An Ordinance Amending Title 12, Zoning Regulations, By Adding Two New Zone Districts As Chapter 7H: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Chapter 71: Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District In Order To Implement The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; Amending Chapter 2, Definitions, Section 12-2-2: Definitions; Amending Chapter 4, Districts Established, Section 12-4-1: Designated, By Adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District; Amending Chapter 10, Off-Street Parking And Loading, Section 12-10-17: Leasing Of Parking Spaces; Amending Chapter 10, Off-Street Parking And Loading, Section 12-10-16: Exempt Areas; Parking Fund Established; Amending Chapter 13, Employee Housing, Section 12-13-6: Type III Employee Housing Unit; Amending Chapter 13, Employee Housing, Section 12-13-7: Type IV Employee Housing Unit; Amending Chapter 14, Supplemental Regulations, Section 12-14- 19: Satellite Dish Antennas; Amending Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, 'And Exclusions, Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements By Zone District; Amending Title 12 Sign Regulations, Chapter 4, Sign Categories, Section 11-4A-1: Signs Permitted In Zoning Districts; And Amending Title 5, Public Health And Safety, Chapter 1, Public Nuisances, Section 5-1-7: Noise Prohibited. (30 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Discussion of changes recommended at the March 2, 1999 Town Council meeting. See materials in packet. 5. Information Update. (10 mins.) 6. Council Reports. (10 mins.) 7. Other. (10 mins.) 8. Adjournment - 3:55 p.m. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3116/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/23/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3116/99, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1999 2/16/99 VAIL VILLAGE LOADING/ GREG H./GREG M./BOB: A request has been made to Ludi Kurz to look at what is being done in Beaver Creek. DELIVERY remove all loading/delivery/semi's from Hanson Ranch Road Sybill Navas/Ludi Kurz and to come up w/a distribution point, regardless of whether that distribution center is located within the TOV's jurisdiction. And to do it IMMEDIATELY! Ludi suggested combining forces w/Beaver Creek, which is experiencing some similar difficulties. 3/2/99 PAY OFF OF INSURANCE CLAIM BOB: Mr. Magoun has accused Susie Combs of perjury Scotti Magoun under oath as relates to an insurance settlement vs. Town of Vail pay off and his further financial obligation for restitution. Bob will ascertain the facts of the situation. March 4, 1999, Page 1 COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1999 2116/99 VAIL VILLAGE LOADING/ GREG HJGREG MJBOB: A request has been made to Both Greg's will meet with Ludi the week of March 81h. Please see DELIVERY remove all loading/delivery/semi's from Hanson Ranch Road attached newspaper article. Sybill Navas/Ludi Kurz and to come up w/a distribution point, regardless of whether that distribution center is located within the TOV's jurisdiction. And to do it IMMEDIATELY! Ludi suggested combining forces w/Beaver Creek, which is experiencing some similar difficulties. 3/2/99 PAY OFF OF INSURANCE CLAIM BOB: Mr. Magoun has accused Susie Combs of perjury Scotti Magoun under oath as relates to an insurance settlement vs. Town of Vail pay off and his further financial obligation for restitution. Bob will ascertain the facts of the situation. March 5, 1999, Page 1 The Daily, Th4rsday,.March_4.1 999.-Pagq A: ~wd uadin 4g~ Town looks at tsr Yom: alternatives to y i„ delivery -system By Elizabeth Mattern s Daily Staff Writer - j VAS' - Some say 40-foot-long q beer and food delivery trucks parked .~I l on the guam, pedestrian streets of the Vail Village don't exactly add to the € $ aesthetics of the resort town's com- core. mercial But those at the Town of Vail and:' Mail Town Council, continual on the with the unsightliness of load- ly faced ing and delivery in the village, have to , whether the problem is worth' decide ex nsive solution like banning all an pe trJcks from the village and build- semi ~::ti il] V 'Smbutron center in West arl. a i Z`• N . ing a di age tl n he villa- u s on to d t e of ~ That s trailers resurfaced at a recent I tractor Y town council meeting. "No one can figure out where to put ' . ~ . k. - , ~ , .<,<. the big tirucks," Paul Johnston, owner of the Christiania at Vail and former Vail Daily/Quentin Hunstad council member, said Monday. "On Beer delivery trucks line up on Hanson Ranch Road in Vail Village late Monday morning. Hanson Ranch Road, it is truck park- ing only on one side of the street only. village's loading and delivery prob- routed to a distribution center as pro- distribution center. We end up with trucks taking up the lems, and some rules and restrictions posed, and some entity - the trucking "I think of we have to try and rur right lane and the center lane and the were tweaked following that study and companies, the business owners or a down to West Vail to bring our sup middle of the street, and it can very a public process. The problem has not third party - would-then be in charge plies in, that would be a joke," Rodney quickly get to gridlock and be haz- gone away, according to some council of delivering items:from the distribu- Johnson, general manager of the Rec ardous for pedestrians." members and members of the public, tion point to the village restaurants in Lion, said. "With the volume that the Depending on size, some delivery but some say it has been reduced. smaller vehicles. restaurants up here in_,the winter get trucks currently are allowed on Bridge "I think, from what I hear, it's the "You have to buy the land, build the loads we take are pretty big." Street Ontil 8:30 a.m., Gore Creek best now it's been in years," Vail the (distribution center) building, and Some people are anxious to have Drive Vntil 11:30 a.m. and Hanson Police Chief Greg Morrison said. figure out who's going to operate it," loading and delivery in the village Ranch road until 6 p.m., according to "The set of rules we have is a complex Hall said. "There's a bunch of issues addressed in a long-teen fashion Greg 1111, acting public works direc- matrix based on three sizes of vehicles there.... It's a problem, but the ques- especially at a time when Vail is try- tor. Because most village businesses and the time of day, and we didn't tion is what cost are you willing.to pay ing to improve its weaknesses and iu do not !save back doors, deliveries are have that until a year and a half ago." to fix it?" status as a world-class resort. made tryrough the front doors, some- But Johnston is looking for a per- And in addition to expense, some "I think it mainly hurts the image times a id customer traffic. manent solution to the noise, safety restaurateurs weren't thrilled at the of the town more than anything else,' The town hired MK Centennial and aesthetics issues outside his hotel. prospect of storing their food and council member Ludwig Kurz said Enginee,nng in 1997 to study short- If large trucks were banned from drinks in a non-village location and "The charm and character of the towr term and loner tern solutions to the the village; Hall said, they could be arranging a delivery system from the is being impacted." A FAST WEST RESORTS SANDRA SAGE Director of Sales and Marketing 0105 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite C202 • PO Box 2636 . Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.5071 • 970.926.5869 Fax email: ewcorp@eastwestresorts.com www.eastwestresorts.com s Sonietbing Specta `,)l, enne KI'llgn24711 7t1~~,1„ant ('li(I( -%i4-,1'S?? b~ the Children's Founra,n RECEIVED MAR 2 1999 EAST WEST RESORTS 1 March 2, 1999 Asrrv Lorelei Donaldson Town Clerk Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 BEAVER CREER"® Ms. Donaldson: Please accept my letter of interest and resume in consideration for the position on the Vail Valley Marketing Board that is currently open. BREC(:r:\RIDGE I have worked in the tourism and hospitality business for over seventeen years as a sales and marketing professional. My expertise spans all areas of strategic development, media production and placement, public relations, special events, research, budgeting and forecasting. Prior to relocating in the Vail Valley, I served for four years as a community elected member of the Breckenridge Resort Chamber Board of Directors, which was responsible coinER,brou,.TAIil for town wide marketing and membership benefits. I understand and appreciate the sensitivity one must exhibit when working within a community that has diverse needs and concerns. Additionally, I have had direct experience working within numerous resort locations throughout Colorado, Utah, California, Hawaii, Arizona, Washington and South KEYs'Fo a, - Carolina. This experience provides me with a broad base of knowledge and expertise in overall resort marketing. I can bring to the Vail Marketing Board an expanded perspective that reaches beyond the ski industry. On a personal note, I have the desire, time and energy to devote to this community position. As Corporate Director of Sales and Marketing for East West Resorts, I am involved daily with sales and marketing issues within Aspen, Summit County, Steamboat SrEAni3vArsrRwcs and Winter Park. Again, this opportunity affords me with valuable insight on statewide marketing issues and trends. I look forward to meeting with the Council to discuss further my qualifications for the Board position. W(NTHR PARK SSandra Sage Corporate Headquarters 0105 Edwards Village Blvd, C202 ? PO Box 2636 A Edwards, CO 81632 A 970.926.5071 • 970.926.5869 Fax email: ewcorp@eastwestresorts.com A www.eastwestresorts.com r. SANDRA SAGE, CHSP P.O. Box 2932 (970) 926-5071 Work Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 926-0159 Home QUALIFICATIONS AND SHILLS Ten years of senior level management experience in organizations specializing in resort condominium property management. Cumulative sixteen years in the resort ski, meeting and hospitality industry culminating in the advanced knowledge of sales and marketing and skills in hotel operations and room revenue enhancements. Proven ability to direct multiple resort sales and marketing programs including key elements of market research, planning, goal setting, budgeting, forecasting, sales strategy, collateral production, advertising, publicity/promotion, and measurement. Strong organizational, motivational and leadership skills with particular focus on management of people and tasks in an unstructured environment often political and changing. Accomplished in working with boards, local businesses, governments and special interest groups. Well respected in the local community and resort industry for commitment, knowledge and integrity. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Corporate Director of Sales & Marketing June 1998 - present East West Resorts, Edwards, CO Responsible for company brand development and revenue growth through regional and national sales and marketing campaigns to include comprehensive media advertising, sales promotions, and public relations. Accountable for developing Internet accommodation reservation systems for all company locations. Direct and oversee sales and marketing activities in ten regional locations throughout Colorado, and Utah. Director of Marketing April 1992 -June 1998 Beaver Run Resort and Conference Center, Breckenridge, CO Directed marketing and sales for 550-room resort/conference hotel with 35,000 square feet of meeting space, four food and beverage outlets and year round recreational amenities. Developed and managed a $1.2 million sales and marketing budget which resulted in an average 4% per year revenue increase over a six year period. Responsibilities included development and implementation of short and long-term marketing and sales strategies, budgeting revenues and expenses, collateral production, public relations and promotions and room inventory management. Corporate Director of Sales June 1990 - May 1992 Village Resorts, Inc., Pleasant Hill, CA Directed national sales for nineteen meeting and resort hotels, comprising 2500 rooms, throughout the western United States and Hawaii. Developed and managed the corporate sales plan and implemented sales strategies for corporate sales efforts in all market segments. Regional Director of Marketing, Colorado & Utah November 1987 - June 1990 Director of Corporate Ski Sales Village Resorts, Inc., Pleasant Hill, CA In charge of the marketing and sales for six meeting/ resort properties with a total rooms inventory of over 1035 rooms, 55,000 square feet of meeting space, $17.6 million dollars in gross room revenues and $5.4 million dollars in F&B revenues. Managed multiple segment marketing programs for direct mail, telemarketing, cooperative programs and promotions with a combined marketing budget of $1.4 million dollars. Director of Sales and Marketing July 1986 - November 1987 Iron Horse Resort, Winter Park, CO Developed and implemented sales and marketing strategies for 130-room luxury resort hotel. Evaluated markets, created and executed advertising and publicity campaigns. Responsible for all national, regional and local client accounts with primary direct sales focus on associations, corporations and executive meeting planners. Secondary focus on tour operator and leisure group business. Administered graphic arts production of all collateral, advertisements and other types of promotional materials. Director of Sales and Marketing August 1984 - July 1986 SilverCreek Resort and Convention Center, Granby, CO Managed convention and leisure sales and marketing for a 340 room resort hotel with 21,000 square feet of meeting space and a 200 acre ski area. Developed and executed the sales and marketing strategies for convention and meeting business as well as leisure and ski business. Responsible for all areas of sales and marketing program development, monitoring and reporting. Supervised sales and convention services staff of fifteen people. EDUCATION Certified Hospitality Sales Professional, American Hotel & Motel Association, 1994 Secondary Teaching Certificate, Science, University of Colorado, 1979 Graduate Studies, Microbiology, Indiana University, 1972-73 BA Microbiology, Indiana University, 1972 4 PROFESSIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND AFFILIATIONS (past and present) Breckenridge Resort Chamber, Board of Directors, 1994-1998 Chairman, April 1996 June 1997 Breckenridge Resort Chamber, Marketing Committee Breckenridge Festival of Film, Board of Directors Breckenridge Music Institute, Board of Directors Hotel Sales and Marketing Association American Society of Association Executives Advisory Board - Colorado Ski Country U.S.A. Meeting Planners International Colorado Society of Association Executives Winter Park Chamber of Commerce, Marketing Committee Winter Park Central Reservations, Advisory Board REFERENCES John Evans Gary Martinez Lucy Kay Chief Operating Officer Town Manager Director of Marketing East West Resorts Breckenridge Breckenridge Ski Resort P.O. Box 2636 P.O. Box 168 P.O. Box 1058 Edwards, CO 81632 Breckenridge, CO 80424 Breckenridge, CO 80424 (970) 926-5071 (970) 453-2251 (970) 453-3208 Sue Daley David Adamson Steve West President, Cope, Daley, McCrea Vice President Marketing Mayor Marketing & Public Relations Resort Express. Town of Breckenridge P.O. Box 989 273 Warren Ave. P.O. Box 168 Breckenridge, CO 80424 Silverthorne, CO 80498 Breckenridge, CO 80424 (970) 876-2826 (970) 468-0330 (970) 453-2251 ' Someacnz9 Special ~brvt avN 1~, 1 ~~1 ~ by the Children's Fountain Lo~~1-ei Da~natdso?~t ~owvi o~ tai I C1~?K lily. NOak701 MN vlaMC 15 AAVI Cvivle Ki?~~~av~ . s WOLA I a ll,Kfe +0 bc- C o vt s i cl-f-v"I v --f h,e v of c a vi c v4 v Tll t VaO Va I It Ll MavK,e4 ~I 9 ooavd. a w1 -w1 e v"A v< a PI C ? a a- rC --al v e jail Vi RcAl e CMIed Sovv~~~l-+~~'~~ S?ec fa,I . MN M avK e- i~i 9 e -X Fe i'e vi c c C o vo e 5 -~V-O n,,' 10 aV 5 0 ~ r~ +O 1 m a vA a I -e wi e vi ~ -FD v- S Vt c., ? Covv 7a vi i- es as Na la,-}--i c a a, vt ci J v ple s Ke vj LjD?<. T a o In of v X Fe v C-C vi c e a Le; at C b v~ a v a. ~-e 1,-~ -f- -f l'OL vL I'l 1-4(( d ~ M LI jobs leave, -fAwdht W-e LSD muck 0"6 0t&f -Fu vt vat S t'k9 q~1 d -A,Ma(('ny Crea-4Ve wa({s S~v yin y w 4-A, rc o budgtf. -f would VtV- 4 ~uC~I I<'KX Con+vrbCA, ~C O'S M~ a s C a. tk- 4v pre s e vt-E-i v y -J+I c VaA L va. f l y IVl I' -s n-7 05~ T~ 1' s va t I-e H i S ere p~- i v (-ed e d D w V\ a o vvi e A LA d M a. (-<e. ~ l i v~V-v~. s +0 a l l f US 4-b 9 V e as vm u w, 0 0 l~Vs~ (~c S as vJ& Ca V? pLe ase (t+ wig k" w b vV Ca. M 6.0, 0 a- it, Lj i s -?-t. ~i 4-e . 11/1 OL V~ LI 6-11,, Kipi 201 Eaa Gore Creek Diz'(,e • Vail, Colorado 81657 • Pbone/Fas (970) 476-8522 3-01-1999 11=50AM FROM P_2 .r, ~i 4 Voil Athletic Club r Hotel & spa t Lms Utley cenaral xanugor ~y January 11, 1999 Pam Brandmeyer VIA Facsimile: (970) 479-2157 Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Copy for Loralei Donaldson 311199 Dear Vail Town Council Members: I. I am writing to express my sincere interest, in becoming a member of the Vail Valley Marketing Board- Having relocated with my wife to the town of Vail in late September we quickly came to realize that this is the place we would like to call home for a very long time. To that end, I would like to commit myself to serving our community in a role that can benefit from my extensive lodging marketing experience. I believe that you will find my experience in hotel sales and marketing f to be broad in scope and demonstrative of continual growth and advancement. I have had particular focus in the group segment and in high end luxury travel. Both.of these areas are critical to the ongoing > successful development of year round destination marketing plans for the Vail Valley. I have also had extensive experience in development and implementation of advertising and marketing plans. i I am prepared to make the time commitment necessary to par cipate fully on the board- I look forward to having an opportunit to interview for this appointment so that I may learn mere ab t your goals and so that I may better articulate my experience an qualifications. rA, Sincerely, Les Utley 352 East Meadow Drive Vail, Co 81657 Telephone (970) 476-0700 Facsimile (970) 476-6451 e-mail nlu@vail.net h. k:a ` -3-01-1999 11:50AM FROM P-3 JP 0 7! Noble L. Utley "Les" 31140 Booth Falls Court Vail, Colorado 81657 f Employment History ail Athletic Club Hotel and Spa ~Cleneral Manager. 10198-Present L.n my present position. I am responsible for all phases of operations for the 38-room boutique hotel, ;Athletic Club, Spa and Terra Bistro restaurant. I remain involved in the direct sales effort and marketing dx~f the hotel by focusing efforts on the New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco markets. I am currently ;,!involved in the planning of a full scale renovation for the hotel and restaurant which is scheduled for pring 2000. Presently developing year round marketing and sales and operations plans for the hotel, club iand spa. The Fairmount Hotel, San Antonio, Texas 0 {,eneral Manager,, 2197-9198 ~Oni my present position I am responsible for all phases of operations in this 37-room boutique Four- Diamond hotel. Total revenues in 1997 were approximately $2.6 million. The hotel operates Polo's a ;FFour-Diamond restaurant in addition to in house catering, which generated $1 million. The hotel leads `'the market in average rate by approximately $37 over our competitive set. I am actively involved in the 1 direct sales effort of the hotel on a day to day basis. The hotel has experienced improved guest xsatisfaction, cost savings and improved employee satisfaction under my leadership. During my tenure as General Manager the hotel was added to the Conde Nast Traveler Top 100 List by being rated in the Top 'f'U;,25 Small Hotels in the world for 1998. The hotel was also awarded Gold List status by Conde Nast ti Traveler. i Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, Seoul, South Korea ! St. Louis, MO T±Director of Sales and .t 4rketing 3195 -11/96 h "Emphasis was placed on total reorganization of entire Korean sales operation including staffing, 4 deployment, systems, procedures and automation. Long-term sales strategies were developed as well as ?,:total account base evaluation. Directed group sales, business travcl sales, yield management and ;:reservation sales.. Developed and implemented short-term daily yield strategies to work in conjunction 1t with long term strategic plans. Coordinated and directed advertising and PR activity. Developed successful hotel wide promotions involving community non-profit organizations. Heavy emphasis was .placed on yield management, pricing and revpar strategy. h, .1i Four Seasons - The Pierre Hotel, New York, NY Director of Sales and Marketing 4/93 - 3/95 I~ireeted business travel and corporate group sales teams targeting the luxury market. Heavy emphasis was placed on financial service accounts in New York City, California and Europe. Primary objectives t~ih were to increase market share while significantly improving average rate- Developed longterm strategy i ito build presence in key European markets and California. Personally managed travel agency and corporate accounts from California. Established a dedicated sales office in London that produced significant results for the hotel and exceeded our goal of 109/6 growth in European guests. I was also wh ministrative responsible for all marketing, advertising and departmental ad functions. ,i J. f ~~1 3-81-1999 11 51 AM FROM P_4 V oble L. Utley "Les" age Two i,. ? 'larion Hotel Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio irector of Sales and Marketing 6/91 - 4/93 Managed six Sales Managers, three Convention Service Managers with shared direction over ;i , ~servations department and catering sales. 1 also had accountability for all aspects of marketing for both .,.ooms and food & beverage. Carried out complete reorganization of all sales administrative support hystems including sales files, computer database, paper flow and front office/customer database. 'Analysis and direction of franchise support systems. Emphasis placed on training, development, otivation and direction of young sales staff. Received recognition from President of Richfield Hotels or outstanding strategies and sales activity. Annual group rooms consumed by the hotel averaged over 100,000 rooms annually. tz;,Stouffer Hotels and Resorts, Los Angeles, CA Houston, TX Director of Sales 8/88- 6/9I ,~Res Ponsible for coordination of sales department including all phases of reporting, forecasting, #narketing plan as well as budget. Supervising eight sales managers, providing direction, development, raining and motivation. Direct sales responsibilities included Washington, D.C., New York, San raneiseo, Texas and professional sports. Focus on major corporate national accounts and associations- NA- disson Hotels, Sandusky, OH - Toledo, OH ~ Director of Sales 9/85 - 8/88 rEstablished pre-opening sales offices for two new hotel projects. Activities included all phases of market Uzi,tudies, development of marketing plan as well as day-to-day advertising agency communications and development of media plan. Responsible for full coordination of sales department, including reporting, ~a`forecasting, budgeting and staffing. Sales responsibilities included Ohio associations and key corporate s&accounts. Activities also included development of marketing plan, day-today advertising agency communications and development of media plan. Developed hotel pre-opening PR plans and successful Ppening events. Hyatt Hotels, Cincinnati, OH `flsales Manager 7 /83 - 8/85 l Joined pre-opening sales office as first sales manager on staff. Sales responsibilities included national ,associations and corporate accounts. In this position I was able to meet and surpass my personal sales ,(goals and was the leading booker of net group rooms booked. Received recognition from corporate Vice President of Sales for outstanding sales achievements. EDUCATION The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH ''Bachelor of Arts Degree 6/83 ' l Student Government 't'ribunal President RStudent Representative-Faculty Grievance Committee y jVice Chairman--Activities / Events Committee ;:Intramural Football and Softball P~ References available upon request ;i w, 4i r°' h PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE Monday, March 8, 1999 FINAL AGENDA Proiect Orientation / PEC LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Greg Moffet Ann Bishop John Schofield Brian Doyon Galen Aasland Diane Golden Tom Weber Site Visits : 1:00 p.m. 1. Antlers-680 W. Lionshead 2. Marriot-714 W. Lionshead Circle 3. VRD-321 E. Lionshead Circle Driver: George NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearing - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a worksession to discuss the establishment of Special Development District No. 36 (Antler's) , to allow for a residential expansion of 24 new condominiums, and 7 new employee housing units, located at 680 W. lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead Third Filing. Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert Levine Planner: Jeff Hunt WORKSESSION - NO VOTE 2. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Marriott Hotel) and a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of the Gore Creek Club and a remodel to the existing hotel, located at 714 Lionshead Circle / Marriott Mark. Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by East-West Partners Planner: George Ruther Tnmunsvnil. 1 Ai CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED MAJOR AMENDMENT: MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 5-0 RECOMMEND TO TOWN COUNCIL WITH 13 amended CONDITIONS (plus 1 recommendation): 1. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of Community Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application for the hotel: a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan; b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan; C. A Stormwater Management Plan; and d. A Traffic Control Plan. 2. That the applicant provide six deed-restricted housing units with no less than 10 pillows, with a 24 - hour desk or manager ehu on-site, which complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13), for a minimum of 10 employees, and that said deed-restricted housing be made available for occupancy, and the deed restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Gore Creek Club. . 3. That the applicant appear before the Design Review Board for a conceptual review of the proposed improvements prior to appearing before the Vail Town Council for consideration of an ordinance amending the Special Development District and receive final Design Review Board approval of the proposed improvements, prior to application for a building permit. 4. That the applicant redesign the proposed loading/delivery plan to insure that service and delivery vehicles do not block or impede pedestrian and vehicle traffic. 5. That the applicant redesign the proposed plans for the Gore Creek Club to provide a minimum of one off-street loading/delivery berth in the alley with the easement deed-restricted and recorded on the plat so the Gore Creek Club can operate as a free-standing facility. 6. That the applicant submit a complete set of civil engineered drawings of all the off-site improvements, including-improvements to West Lionshead Circle, the sidewalk from the common property line with Antler's to the South Frontage Road, for the required on-site and off-site storm water drainage and management system, for the pedestrian connection to the streamwalk, for review and approval, prior to application for a building permit. 7. That the applicant submit to the Community Development Department an approval letter from the owner of Lot A to the west of the Gore Creek Club development site granting permission to regrade portions of Lot A as depicted on the proposed plans. 2 8. That the applicant revise the plans to eliminate any off-site encroachments of the building on the Town of Vail right-of-way, prior to an appearance before the Design Review Board. 9. That the applicant meet with the Town Staff to prepare a letter of agreement outlining the requirements of the off-site improvements, prior to first reading of an ordinance approving the major amendment. 10. That the new sidewalk along the south side of West Lionshead Circle be snowmelted only contiguous to the applicant's property. 11. That the applicant amend the proposed landscape plan and provide increased amount of landscaping, using AIPP opportunities to integrate functional art pieces, at the front entrance to the Gore Creek Club and the retail shops and that it be approved by the DRB. 12. That the applicant submit a proposed streambank improvement plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to application for a building permit. 13. That the applicant submit complete set of plans to the Town of Vail Colorado Department of Transportation for review and that before a final reading with the Town Council, the applicant enter into a Frontage Road agreement and approval of a left turn lane off of the South Frontage Road onto West Lionshead Circle. The plans shall by approved by CDOT prior to application for a building permit. Recommendation: That the PEC recommends to the DRB that the applicant use some other shingle than asphalt. 3. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room and loading dock expansion to the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999 4. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20%, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999 3 5. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for an encroachment into the required side setbacks, located at 3003 Bellflower Drive / Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Mr. Guillermo Huerta Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999 6. A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Glen Lyon), revising the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road. West/Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL APRIL 26, 1999 7. Information Update Three, two-year term PEC vacancies (Greg Moffet, John Schofield and Ann Bishop) 8. Approval of February 22, 1999 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information- Community Development Department 4 S DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINAL AGENDA Wednesday, March 3, 1999 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Brent Alm Clark Brittain Hans Woldrich Bill Pierce SITE VISITS 1:30 pm 1. SBC Development -1047 Spraddle Creek Dr. 2. Herman - 343 Beaver Dam 3. Payne - 381 Beaver Dam Circle 4. Slifer Building - 230 Bridge Street 5. Bridge St. Building - 281 Bridge St." 6. Dobson Ice Arena 7. Lionshead Mini-Golf -Tract B&D, Lionshead Driver: Jeff PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm 1. Broe / Neptune II residence - New primary/secondary residence. Brent 1270 Westhaven Circle / Lot 28, Glen Lyon. Applicant: Pat Broe, represented by William Reslock MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 4-0 TABLED UNTIL 3 CONDITIONS ARE RESOLVED: 1. The DRB would like to see detail drawings of the fascia, railing and trim elements. 2. A revised landscape plan that shows the application of landscape screening around the transformer at the southwest corner of the lot must be submitted. 3. The outstanding Public Works issues must be resolved. 2. Tavoso residence - New primary/secondary residence. Dominic 2655 Davos Trail / Lot 18, Block 2, Vail Ridge. Applicant: Steve Tavos, represented by William Reslock MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 3-1 CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: 1. That the driveway issue be worked out with Public Works. TOWNOFVAIL 1' 1 t 3. Bridge St. Building - Paver replacement and snowmelt system for walkway. Dominic 281 Bridge Street/Lots D, E, and F, Block 5C, Vail Village 1s' Filing. Applicant: Mark Cadmus, Bridge Street Condo Association CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 4. Berndt residence - Final review of a new primary/secondary residence. Allison 756 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 4, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Wolfgang Berndt, represented by Steve Riden MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 4-0 CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: 1. That the site grading issue be worked out with Public Works. 5. Northwoods - Conceptual review of an approved development plan. Allison 600 Vail Valley Drive/Northwoods Condominiums. Applicant: Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 4-0 CONSENT APPROVED AS PRESENTED 6. Herman residence - Conceptual review of an addition and remodel to a primary Allison residence. 343 Beaver Dam Rd./Lot 1, Block 3, Vail Village 3`d Applicant: Mark Donaldson Architects CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 7. SBC Development -Conceptual review of a primary residence with EHU. Allison 1047 Spraddle Creek Dr./Lot 6, Spraddle Creek Applicant: Robert Mach CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 8. Lionshead Miniature Golf Course - New recreational climbing structure. Jeff Eagle Bahn Ski Yard/ Part of Tracts B & D, Lionshead 1St Filing. Applicant: Charlie Alexander MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Clark Brittain VOTE: 3-0 APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS: 1. That there be a wooden rail fence. 2. That the trailer be screened with landscaping. 9. Cummings residence - New single-family residence and Type I employee housing unit. Jeff 1835 West Gore Creek Drive / Lot 20, Vail Village West 2" Filing Applicant: Greg and Janice Cummings CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 2 10. Laidlaw residence - Final review of a new single-family residence. George 1722 Geneva Driv/Lot 10, Matterhorn Village Applicant: Walt Laidlaw, represented by RKD MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0 TABLED 11. -Westhaven Condos - Final review of a proposed new Fractional Fee Club George and employee housing project. 1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A. Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby Robinson MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0 TABLED 12. Payne - Separation request. George 381 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Applicant: W&B Development, LLC MOTION: -Clark Brittain SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 4-0 CONSENT APPROVED 13. Slifer Building - Change to approved plans. George 230 Bridge St./Lot B&C, Block 5, Vail Village 1St Applicant: Slifer Smith & Frampton MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 4-0 CONSENT APPROVED AS PRESENTED 14. Dobson Ice Arena locker room and loading dock expansion George 321 Lionshead Circle/Lot 1 Blockl, Vail Lionshead Second Filing Applicant: Stanley Turner, representing the applicant MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE: 4-0 TABLED Staff Approvals Peters residence - Extension of approval for new residence attached to existing residence. Allison 4193 Spruce Lane/Block 9, Lot 12, Bighorn 3`d Applicant: Steve Peters Yare residence - Storage room addition; deck & guardrail renovations. Brent 1839 Meadow Ridge Road #D/Lot 14, Buffehr Creek. Applicant: Mark Yare Dyer residence - 250 exterior addition. George 380 E. Lionshead Circle/Tracts I&J, Vail Lionshead 1St Applicant: Marilyn Dyer Los Amigos - Temporary deck extension. Brent 228 Bridge St./Lots A&B, Block 2, Vail Village 1St Applicant: Michael Staughton 3 Plum residence - Minor exterior alterations. Brent 83 Willow Place, Riverhouse #6&7/Lot 3, Block 6, Vail Village 1St Applicant: Roy & Kathy Plum The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. - Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ADDITION TO THE DOBSON ICE ARENA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17"', 1999 Brent Alm • The parapet appears a little too high and top-heavy. • Save as many trees as possible - especially on the west side of the loading dock. • The simple geometry, flat roof forms and use of existing materials work well. • The canopy idea is interesting. • The cupola/periscope feature needs to be more subdued. • The skylight may be a bit extravagant. , • The loading dock gate should be solid - not transparent. • The use of zinc may work - but no so much on the parapet. Bill Pierce • This is a big step in the right direction. • A transparent loading dock gate is desirable. • The use of indigenous/existing materials is encouraged. • New windows should blend with the existing concept. • The fascia strips should be carried consistently throughout. • The parapet may be out of proportion. • The skylight may not be necessary. • The cupola/periscope feature is ok. • The zinc panels are good - but maybe not vertically aligned. • Get the loading dock functioning, then save as many trees as you can. • We may want to see if AIPP would like to get involved. Maybe on the gates? Hans Woldrich • Concurs with Brent and Bill. • The addition should be "quiet" and secondary to the existing building. • The canopy should not be as bright or glitzy. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE Monday, March 8, 1999 AGENDA Project Orientation / PEC LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits : 1:00 P.M. 1. Antlers-680 W. Lionshead 2. Marriot-714 W. Lionshead. Circle 3. VRD-321 E. Lionshead Circle Driver: George ~D NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearing - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a worksession to discuss the establishment of Special Development District No. 36 (Antler's) , to allow for a residential expansion of 24 new condominiums, and 7 new employee housing units, located at 680 W. lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead Third Filing. Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert Levine Planner: Jeff Hunt 2. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Marriott Hotel) and a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of the Gore Creek Club and a remodel to the existing hotel, located at 714 Lionshead Circle / Marriott Mark. Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by East-West Partners Planner: George Ruther 3. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room and loading dock expansion to the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999 TOWN OFVAR, 1 4. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20%, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999 5. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for an encroachment into the required side setbacks, located at 3003 Bellflower Drive / Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Intermountain., Applicant: Mr. Guillermo Huerta Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999 6. A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Glen Lyon), revising the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL APRIL 26, 1999 7. Information Update Three, two-year term PEC vacancies (Greg Moffet, John Schofield and Ann Bishop) 8. Approval of February 22, 1999 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published March 5, 1998 in the Vail Trail 2 Memorandum To: Town Council From: Nina Timm Russ Forrest Subject: Development Program for the A-Frame site at 2657 Arosa Drive Date: March 9, 1999 1. Purpose The purpose of this work session is to review a proposed redevelopment plan for the A- Frame site and to request Councils approval to proceed through the development process. Staff has held two neighborhood meetings with the residents surrounding the A-Frame site to discuss the redevelopment. Several concerns were raised at the first meeting about the potential development and one of the neighbors, Kathy Langenwalter, offered a revised development plan. This revised design, which is attached, was discussed with the neighbors on March 3, 1999 and was well received. II. Description of Design The plan calls for the demolition of the existing 4 bedroom single family home to be replaced by a duplex. The north side of the duplex will have 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, and a two-car garage. The south side of the duplex will have 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, and a two- car garage. There will not be a caretaker unit within the development, as currently proposed. Due to the narrow configuration of the lot, the existing drainage along the east edge of the property and the steep slopes on the western side of the site, a rear yard setback variance will be required in order to develop the current plan. III. Next Steps If the Council approves the development program as designed, the Town will incorporate this component into the Arosa/Garmisch Request For Qualifications. The goal will be to hire a single development team to construct the neighborhood park, six units at Arosa/Garmisch, and the duplex on the A-Frame site. C., L F \ y fi I nw~~ , ~u~~eiN~ I S \ \ May ~ PIPVE \ l t1e t i __~i~H i - ~ . ~f~=Fl====- - _ up aim eN up CJ W b o EE I T F Uq t - Memorandum To: Town Council From: Dominic Mauriello, Chief of Planning Subject: Revisions to proposed Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 Date: March 5, 1999 Attached are the revisions discussed at the March 2, 1999 Town Council meeting regarding Ordinance No. 3. The changes are highlighted in the ordinance. No changes have been made to the "Mitigation of Development Impacts" section. Staff is looking for some direction about this section. Staff is simply verifying that these are the changes Council desires. Additionally, you will find in your packet a copy of the PEC memo on the proposed Marriott redevelopment. Included in this memo is a report about timeshares that is very informative. \\VAI L\DATA\EVERYONE\COUNCI L\ME MO S\99\lion3 O S.d o c ORDINANCE NO. 3 Series of 1999 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, BY ADDING TWO NEW ZONE DISTRICTS AS CHAPTER 7H: LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 DISTRICT AND CHAPTER 71: LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 DISTRICT IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN; AMENDING CHAPTER 2, DEFINITIONS, SECTION 12-2- 2: DEFINITIONS; AMENDING CHAPTER 4, DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED, SECTION 12-4-1: DESIGNATED, BY ADDING LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 DISTRICT AND LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 DISTRICT; AMENDING CHAPTER 10, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING, SECTION 12-10-17: LEASING OF PARKING SPACES; AMENDING CHAPTER 10, OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING, SECTION 12-10-16: EXEMPT AREAS; PARKING FUND ESTABLISHED; AMENDING CHAPTER 13, EMPLOYEE HOUSING, SECTION 12-13-6: TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT; AMENDING CHAPTER 13, EMPLOYEE HOUSING, SECTION 12-13-7: TYPE IV EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT; AMENDING CHAPTER 14, SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, SECTION 12-14-19: SATELLITE DISH ANTENNAS; AMENDING CHAPTER 15, GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA, SECTION 12-15-3: DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND. EXCLUSIONS, SECTION 12-15-2: GRFA REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE DISTRICT; AMENDING TITLE 12 SIGN REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 4, SIGN CATEGORIES, SECTION 11- 4A-1: SIGNS PERMITTED IN ZONING DISTRICTS; AND AMENDING TITLE 5, PUBLIC HELTH AND SAFETY, CHAPTER 1, PUBLIC NUISANCES, SECTION 5-1-7: NOISE PROHIBITED. WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to implement the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, adopted by the Town on December 15, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District and the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Town's Land Use Plan, and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of these new zone districts at its February 22, 1999 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest,of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend said Chapter and Sections of the Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Title 12, Chapter 7, adding new Article H. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, to read as follows: ARTICLE H. LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 (LMU-1) DISTRICT SECTION: 12-71-1-1: Purpose 12-71-1-2: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement Or Garden Level: 12-7H-3: Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor Or Street Level: 12-7H-4: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second Floor and Above: 12-71-1-5: Conditional Uses; Generally 12-7H-6: Accessory Uses 12-7H-7: Exterior Alterations Or Modifications 12-7H-8: Compliance Burden 12-71-1-9: Lot Area and Site Dimensions 12-71-1-10: Setbacks 12-7H-11: Height and Bulk 1 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 12-71-1-12: Density (dwelling units per acre) 12-71-1-13: Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) 12-7H-14: Site Coverage 12-71-1-15: Landscaping and Site Development 12-71-1-16: Parking and Loading 12-7H-17: Location Of Business Activity 12-71-1-18: Mitigation of Development Impacts 12-71-1-1: PURPOSE: The Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, timeshares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light,,air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. This district is meant to encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. This zone district was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop. The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create a economically vibrant lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The incentives in this zone district include increases in allowable gross residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the incentives is to create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help finance public off-site improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. With any development/redevelopment proposal taking advantage of the incentives created herein, the following amenities will be evaluated: streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements. 12-7H-2: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; BASEMENT OR GARDEN LEVEL: A. Definition: The "basement" or "garden level" shall be defined as that floor of a building that is entirely or substantially below grade. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure: Banks and financial institutions. Commercial ski storage. Eating and drinking establishments. Public or private lockers and storage. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. , Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Major arcade. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 2 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 12-71-1-3: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building that is located at grade or street level along a pedestrian way. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level within a structure: Banks, with walkup teller facilities. Eating and drinking establishments. Recreation facilities. Retail stores and establishments. Skier ticketing, ski.school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level floor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Financial institutions, other than banks. Barbershops, beauty shops and beauty parlors. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. .Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-1-4: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; SECOND FLOOR AND ABOVE: A. Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on those floors above the first floor within a structure: Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on second floors and higher above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Banks and financial institutions. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Eating and drinking establishments. Liquor stores. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Timeshare units and fractional fee clubs. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 3 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 12-71-1-5: CONDITIONAL USES; GENERALLY (on all levels of a building or outside of a building): The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 12-14-18 of this Title. Brew pubs. Coin-operated laundries. Commercial storage. Public or private parking lots. Public buildings, grounds, and facilities. Public park and recreation facilities. Public utility and public service uses. Private outdoor recreation facilities, as a primary use. Ski lifts and tows. Television stations. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this, subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-1-6: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Title. Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to permitted.and conditional uses. Minor arcade. Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and drinking establishments. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential or lodge uses. Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12-71-1-7: EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS: Review Required: The construction of a new building or the alteration of an existing building shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board in accordance with Chapter 12-11 of the Zoning Regulations. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units, fractional fee club units, timeshare units, any project which adds more than 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area or common space, or any project which has substantial off-site impacts (as determined by the Administrator) shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission'as a Major Exterior Alteration in accordance with this Chapter and Section 12-3-6: Hearings. Any project which requires a conditional use permit shall also obtain approval of the Planning and Environmental Commission in accordance with Chapter 12-16 of the Zoning Regulations. Complete applications for major exterior alterations shall be submitted in accordance with administrative schedules developed by the Community Development Department for Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board review. The following submittal items are required: 1. Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building or the building owner's authorized agent or representative on a form provided by the Administrator. Any application for condominiumized buildings shall be authorized by the condominium association in conformity with all pertinent requirements of the condominium association's declarations. 2. Application; Contents: An application for an exterior alteration shall include the following: a. Completed application form, filing fee, and a list of all owners of property located adjacent to the subject parcel. The owners list shall include the names of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property owned by each, and a general description of the property (including the name of the property, if applicable), and the name and mailing address of the condominium association's representative (if applicable). Said names and addresses shall be 4 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 obtained from the current tax records of Eagle County as they appeared not more than thirty (30) days prior to the application submittal date. b. A written statement describing the proposal and how the proposal complies with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and any other relevant sections of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. c. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on the property including the location of improvements, topography, and natural features. d. A current title report to verify ownership, easements, and other encumbrances, including Schedules A and B3. e. Existing and proposed site plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a vicinity plan at an-appropriate scale to adequately show the project location in relationship to the surrounding area, a landscape plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a roof height plan and existing and proposed building elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equals one foot (1/8" = 1'). The material. listed above shall include adjacent buildings and improvements as necessary to demonstrate the project's compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. f. Sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fall equinox (March 21/September 23) and winter solstice (December 21) at ten o'clock (10:00) A.M. and two o'clock (2:00) P.M. unless the Department of Community Development determines that the proposed addition has no impact on the existing sun/shade pattern. The following sun angle shall be used when preparing this analysis: Spring/Fall Equinox Sun Angle 10:00 A.M. 40° east of south, 50° declination 2:00 P.M. 42° west of south, 50° declination Winter Solstice Sun Angle 10:00 A.M. 30° east of south, 20° declination 2:00 P.M. 30° west of south, 20° declination g. Existing and proposed floor plans at a minimum scale of one-fourth inch equals one foot (1/4" = 1') and a square footage analysis of all existing and proposed uses. h. An architectural or massing model of the proposed development. Said model shall include buildings and major site improvements on adjacent properties as deemed necessary by the Administrator. The scale of the model shall be as determined by the Administrator. L Photo overlays and/or other graphic material to demonstrate the special relationship of the proposed development to adjacent properties, public spaces, and adopted views per Chapter 22 of this Title. j. Parking needs assessment and vehicular circulation analysis, prepared by a qualified professional. k. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Administrator or the Town Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). The Administrator or the Planning and Environmental Commission may, at his/her or their discretion, waive certain submittal requirements if it is determined that the requirements are not relevant to the proposed development nor applicable to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 4. Work Sessions/Conceptual Review: If requested by either the applicant or the Administrator, submittals may proceed to a work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission, a conceptual review with the Design Review Board, or a worksession with the Town Council. 5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission shall be held in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of this Title. The Planning and Environmental 5 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 Commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with conditions or modifications, or deny the application; The decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council in accordance with Section 1273-3 of this Title. 6. Lapse Of Approval: Approval of an exterior alteration as prescribed by this Article shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of approval by the Design Review Board unless, prior to the expiration, a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued to completion. Administrative extensions shall be allowed for reasonable and unexpected delays as long as code provisions affecting the proposal have not changed. 12-7H-8: COMPLIANCE BURDEN: It shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed exterior alteration or new development is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative affects on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. 12-7H-9:.LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of buildable area. 12-7H-10: SETBACKS: The minimum building setbacks shall be ten feet (10') unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan as a build-to line. 12-7H-11: HEIGHT AND BULK: Buildings shall have a maximum average building height of 71' with a maximum height of 82.5', as further defined by the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. All development shall comply with the design guidelines and standards found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Flexibility with the standard, as incorporated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, shall be afforded to redevelopment projects which meet the intent of design guidelines, as reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 12-7H-12: DENSITY (dwelling units per acre): Up to a 33% increase over the existing number of dwelling units on a property or 35 dwelling units per acre, whichever is greater shall be allowed. For the purpose of calculating density, employee housing units, accommodation units, timeshare units, and fractional fee club units shall not be counted as dwelling units. Additionally, a lodge dwelling unit, as defined herein, shall be counted as 25% of a dwelling unit for the purpose of calculating density. 12-71-1-13: GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA): Unless otherwise specified in the WeRshead Redevelopmew Master Plan, not moFe t Up to 250 sq. ft. of gross residential floor area shall be allowed for each 100 sq. ft. of buildable site area, or an increase of 330/. over the existing GRFA found on the property, whichever is greater. Multiple-family dwelling units in this zone district shall not be entitled to additional Gross Residential Floor Area under the 250 Ordinance, Section 12-15-5, of the Municipal Code. 12-71-1-14: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total site area, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 12-71-1-15: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least twenty percent (20%) of the total site area shall be landscaped, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead• Redevelopment Master Plan. Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 6 12-7H-16: PARKING AND LOADING: Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title. At least one-half (1/2) the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings. 12-71-1-17: LOCATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: A. Limitations; Exception: All offices, businesses and services permitted by zone district, shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted unenclosed parking or loading areas, the outdoor display of goods, or outdoor restaurant seating. B. Outdoor Displays: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by outdoor display. 12-71-1-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS: Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts of their development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation shall bear a reasonable relation to the development impacts. Impacts may be determined based on reports prepared by qualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public amenity improvements shall be balanced with the goals of redevelopment and will be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission in review of development projects and conditional use permits. Mitigation of impacts may include, but is not limited to, the following: roadway improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, stream tract/bank improvements, public art improvements, and similar improvements. Section 2. Title 12, Chapter 7, adding new Article I. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, to read as follows: ARTICLE I. LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 (LMU-2) DISTRICT SECTION: 12-71-1: Purpose 12-71-2: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement Or Garden Level: 12-71-3: Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor Or Street Level: 12-71-4: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second Floor and Above: 12-71-5: Conditional Uses; Generally 12-71-6: Accessory Uses 12-71-7: Exterior Alterations Or Modifications 12-71-8: Compliance Burden 12-71-9: Lot Area and Site Dimensions 12-71-10: Setbacks 12-71-11: Height and Bulk 12-71-12: Density (dwelling units per acre) 12-71-13: Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) 12-71-14: Site Coverage 12-71-15: Landscaping and Site Development 12-71-16: Parking and Loading 12-71-17: Location Of Business Activity 12-71-18: Mitigation of Development Impacts 12-71-1: PURPOSE: The Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, timeshares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, light industrial activities, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. This district is meant to encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. This zone district was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop. 7 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create a economically vibrant lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The incentives in this zone district include increases in allowable gross residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the incentives is to create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help finance public, off-site, improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. Public amenities which will be evaluated with redevelopment proposals taking advantage of the incentives created herein may include: streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements. 12-71-2: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; BASEMENT OR GARDEN LEVEL: A. Definition: The "basement" or "garden level" shall be defined as that floor of a building that is entirely or substantially below grade. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure: Banks and financial institutions. Commercial ski storage. Eating and drinking establishments. Public or private lockers and storage. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use. permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Major arcade. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-3: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building that is located at grade or street level along a pedestrian way. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level within a structure: Banks, with walkup teller facilities. Eating and drinking establishments. Recreation facilities. Retail stores and establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level floor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the 8 Ordinance No. 3 ; Series of 1999 provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Financial institutions, other than banks. Barbershops, beauty shops and beauty parlors. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-4: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; SECOND FLOOR AND ABOVE: A. Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on those floors above the first floor within a structure: Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in'accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on second floors and higher above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Banks and financial institutions. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Eating and drinking establishments. Liquor stores. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Timeshare units and fractional fee clubs. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-5: CONDITIONAL USES; GENERALLY (on all levels of a building or outside of a building): The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 12-14-18 of this Title. Brew pubs. Coin-operated laundries. Commercial storage. Gasoline and service stations. Public or private parking lots. Public buildings, grounds, and facilities. Public park and recreation facilities. Public utility and public service uses. Private outdoor recreation facilities, as a primary use. Ski lifts and tows. Television stations. Vehicle maintenance, service, repair, storage, and fueling. Warehousing. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this 9 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-6: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Title. Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to permitted and conditional uses. Minor arcade. Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and drinking establishments. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential or lodge uses. Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12-71-7: EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS: Review Required: The construction of a new building or the alteration of an existing building shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board in accordance with Chapter 12-11 of the Zoning Regulations. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units, fractional fee club units, timeshare units, any project which adds more than 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area or common space, or any project which has substantial off-site impacts (as determined by the Administrator) shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission as a Major Exterior Alteration in accordance with this Chapter and Section 12-3-6: Hearings. Any project which requires a conditional use permit shall also obtain approval of the Planning and Environmental Commission in accordance with Chapter 12-16 of the Zoning Regulations. Complete applications for major exterior alterations shall be submitted in accordance with administrative schedules developed by the Community Development Department for Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board review. The following submittal items are required: 1. Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building or the building owner's authorized agent or representative on a form provided by the Administrator. Any application for condominiumized buildings shall be authorized by the condominium association in conformity with all pertinent requirements of the condominium association's declarations. 2. Application; Contents: An application for an exterior alteration shall include the following: a. Completed application form, filing fee, and a list of all owners of property located adjacent to the subject parcel. The owners list shall include the names of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property owned by each, and a general description of the property (including the name of the property, if applicable), and the name and mailing address of the condominium association's representative (if applicable). Said names and addresses shall be obtained from the current tax records of Eagle County as they appeared not more than thirty (30) days prior to the application submittal date. b. A written statement describing the proposal and how the proposal complies with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and any other relevant sections of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. c. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on the property including the location of improvements, topography, and natural features. d. A current title report to verify ownership, easements, and other encumbrances, including Schedules A and B3. e. Existing and proposed site plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a vicinity plan at an appropriate scale to adequately show the project location in relationship to the surrounding area, a landscape plan at a minimum scale, of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a roof height plan and existing and 10 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 proposed building elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equals one foot (1/8" = 1'). The material listed above shall include adjacent buildings and improvements as necessary to demonstrate the project's compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. f. Sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fall equinox (March 21./September 23) and winter solstice (December 21) at ten o'clock (10:00) A.M. and two o'clock (2:00) P.M. unless the Department of Community Development determines that the proposed addition has no impact on the existing sun/shade pattern. The following sun angle shall be used when preparing this analysis: Spring/Fall Equinox Sun Angle 10:00 A.M., 40° east of south, 50° declination 2:00 P.M. 42° west of south, 50° declination Winter Solstice Sun Angle 10:00 A.M. 30° east of south, 20° declination 2:00 P.M. 30° west of south,-20° declination g. Existing and proposed floor plans at a minimum scale of one-fourth inch equals one, foot (1/4" = 1) and a square footage analysis of all existing and proposed uses. h. An architectural or massing model of the proposed development. Said model shall include buildings and major site improvements on adjacent properties as deemed necessary by the Administrator. The scale of the model shall be as determined by the Administrator. i. Photo overlays and/or other graphic material to demonstrate the special relationship of the proposed development to adjacent properties, public spaces, and adopted views per Chapter 22 of this Title. j. Parking needs assessment and vehicular circulation analysis, prepared by a qualified professional. k. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Administrator or the Town Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). The Administrator or the Planning and Environmental Commission may, at his/her or their discretion, waive certain submittal requirements if it is determined that the requirements are not relevant to the proposed development nor applicable to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 4. Work Sessions/Conceptual Review: If requested by either the applicant or the Administrator, submittals may proceed to a work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission, a conceptual review with the Design Review Board, or a worksession with the Town Council. 5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission shall be held in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of this Title. The Planning and Environmental Commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with conditions or modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council in accordance with Section 12-3-3 of this Title. 6. Lapse Of Approval: Approval of an exterior alteration as prescribed by this Article shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of approval by the Design Review Board unless, prior to the expiration, a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued to completion. Administrative extensions shall be allowed for reasonable and unexpected delays as long as code provisions affecting the proposal have not changed. 12-71-8: COMPLIANCE BURDEN: It shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed exterior alteration or new development is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead 11 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 Mixed Use 2 District, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative affects on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. 12-71-9: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of buildable area. 12-71-10: SETBACKS: The minimum building setbacks shall be ten feet (10') unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan as a build-to line. 12-71-11: HEIGHT AND BULK: Buildings shall have a maximum average building height of 71' with a maximum height of 82.5', as further defined by the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. All development shall comply with the design guidelines and standards found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Flexibility with the standard, as incorporated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, shall be afforded to redevelopment projects which meet the intent of design guidelines, as reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 12-71-12: DENSITY (dwelling units per acre): leFwise spealfied in the LIGRshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Rot mom t Up to a Wess _1 33% increase over the existing number of dwelling units on a property or 35 dwelling units per acre, whichever is greater shall be allowed. For the purpose of calculating density, employee housing units, accommodation units, timeshare units, and fractional fee club units shall not be counted as dwelling units. Additionally, a lodge dwelling unit, as defined herein, shall be counted as 25% of a dwelling unit for the purpose of calculating density. 12-71-13: GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA): Up to 250 sq. ft. of gross residential floor area shall be allowed for each 100 sq. ft. of buildable site area, or an increase of 33% over the existing GRFA found on the property, whichever is greater. Multiple-family dwelling units in this zone district shall not be entitled to additional Gross Residential Floor Area under the 250 Ordinance, Section 12-15-5, of the Municipal Code. 12-71-14: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total site area, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 12-71-15: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least twenty percent (20%) of the total site area shall be landscaped, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 12-71-16: PARKING AND LOADING: Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title. At least one-half (2) the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings. 12-71-17: LOCATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: A. Limitations; Exception: All offices, businesses and services permitted by zone district, shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted unenclosed parking or loading areas, the outdoor display of goods, or outdoor restaurant seating. B. Outdoor Displays: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by outdoor display. 12 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 12-71-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS: Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts of their development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation shall bear a reasonable relation to the development impacts. Impacts may be determined based on reports prepared by qualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public amenity'improvements shall be balanced with the goals of redevelopment and will be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission in review of development projects and conditional use permits. Mitigation of impacts may include, but is not limited to, the following: roadway improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, stream tract/bank improvements, public art improvements, and similar improvements. Section 3. Title 12, Chapter 2, Section 12-2-2: Definitions, is hereby amended by adding the following definitions: Commercial Ski Storage: Storage for equipment (skis, snowboards, boots and poles) and/or clothing used in skiing-related sports, which is available to the public or members, operated by a business, club or government organization, and where a fee is charged for hourly, daily, monthly, seasonal or annual usage. 'Ski storage that is part of a lodge, or dwelling unit, in which a fee is not charged, is not considered commercial ski storage. Personal Services: A commercial business where a service is offered to the customer including beauty and barber shops, tailor shops, and similar services. Lodge dwelling unit: A small dwelling unit with limited kitchen and floor area and which contains 650 sq. ft. or less of floor area and is intended to be rented on a short term basis. Section 4. Title 12, Chapter 4, Section 12-4-1: Designated, is hereby amended to add the following zone districts: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District (LMU-1) Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District (LMU-2) Section 5. Title 12, Chapter 10, Section 12-10-17: Leasing of Parking Spaces, is hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is stFicken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Modify B(1) as follows: B. Lease Qualifications; Application To Lease: A parking space, spaces or areas may be leased by the owner, occupant or building manager thereof in accordance with the following: 1. Any owner, occupant or building manager who owns, occupies or manages ten (10) or more private parking spaces located in Commercial Core 1, Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodations, Lionshead Mixed Use 1, Lionshead Mixed Use 2 or special development zone districts and provides sufficient parking for use by employees may apply to the Administrator of the Town for a permit to lease parking spaces. Section 6. Title 12, Chapter 13, Section 12-13-6: Type III Employee Housing Unit and Section 12-13-7: Type IV Employee Housing Unit are hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is stFieken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Section 12-13-6: Type III Employee Housing Unit Modify B(1 and 3) as follows (modify summary table as necessary): B. General Conditions: 1. It shall be a conditional use in the Residential Cluster, Low Density Multiple- Family, Medium Density Multiple-Family, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodation, Commercial Core I, Commercial Core II, Commercial Core III, Commercial Service Center, Arterial Business District, Parking District; General Use, and Ski Base/Recreation Zone Districts. It shall be a permitted use in 13 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts. 3. It shall be counted as five-tenths (0.5) dwelling unit for the purposes of calculating density, unless located in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 or Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts, where it is not counted as density. The number of Type III employee housing units shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission as part of the conditional use permit.review process set forth in Section 12-16-6,"Criteria; Findings" of this Title, if applicable. Section 12-13-7 Type IV Employee Housing Unit Modify B(1 and 3) as follows (modify summary table as necessary): B. General Conditions: 1. It shall be a conditional use in the Residential Cluster, Low Density Multiple- Family, Medium Density Multiple-Family, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodation, Commercial Core I, Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3, Commercial Service Center, Arterial Business District, Parking District, General Use, and Ski/Base Recreation Zone Districts. It shall be a permitted use in Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts. 3. It shall be counted as 0.333 of a dwelling unit for the purposes of calculating density, unless located in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 or Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts, where it is not counted as density. The number of Type IV employee housing units shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission as part of the conditional use permits review process set forth in Section 12-16-6 of this Title, if applicable. Section 7. Title 12, Chapter 14, Section 12-14-19: Satellite Dish Antennas, is hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is -;tr'PkPA is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Modify D(1)(i) as follows: D. Compliance With Requirements; Variance: 1. Requirements: Satellite dish antennas shall comply with the following requirements: i. Due to the special aesthetic importance of the core areas of the Town, exterior installations of satellite dish antennas in Commercial Cores 1, a-nd 2, Lionshead Mixed Use 1, and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts shall be permitted only if. screened by some type of enclosing structure. Said structures required to enclose a satellite dish antenna in these areas shall comply with all applicable zoning regulations and shall be architecturally compatible with the existing structure. Section 8. Title 12, Chapter 15, Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements by Zone District and Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions, are hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is see is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements by Zone District Modify by adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts to table as follows: GRFA Zone Districts Ratio/Percentage GRFA Credits LMU-1 250% of buildable lot area None Lionshead Mixed Use 1 LMU-2 250% of buildable lot area None Lionshead Mixed Use 2 Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions Modify 2(b) as follows: 14 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 Multiple-Family Structures: Within buildings containing more than two (2) allowable dwellings or accommodation units, the following additional areas shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. GRFA shall be calculated by measuring the total square footage of a building as set forth herein. Excluded areas as set forth shall then be deducted from the total square footage: a. Enclosed garages to accommodate on-site parking requirements. b. All or part of the following spaces, provided such spaces are common spaces. and that the total square feetage of all the followlRg spaGes shall not exGeed thirty five 0 peFGent 0 G R€A. (1) Common hallways, stairways, elevator shafts and airlocks. (2) Common lobby areas. (3) Common enclosed recreation facilities. (4) Common heating, cooling or ventilation systems, solar rock storage areas, or other mechanical systems. 6ystems (5) Common closet and storage areas, providing access to such areas is from common hallways only. (6) Meeting and convention facilities. (7) Office space, provided such space is used exclusively for the management and operation of on-site facilities. (8) Floor area to be used in a Type III or a Type IV "Employee Housing Unit (EHU)" as defined and restricted by Chapter 13 of this Title, 0 provided said EHU fleer area shall not eXGeed sixty peFGeRt 0 of !he thiFty five pefflent 0 exeeeds the sixty perGent area shall be 'RGIudedin the ealeulation of GRFA. if a property hows'ne anal subsequentlY y requests a cr C~rrt mF~6f~ area iaanee the `1°G1T~T" Muc~rs-~~ri rrcc,-mc commen uses aRd that the empleyee hey Koine Unito be replan-erl Section 9. Title 11, Chapter 4, Section 11-4A-1: Signs permitted in Zoning Districts, is hereby amended by adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts to the table in the same category which contains Commercial Core 2. Section 10. Title 5, Chapter 1, Section 5-1-7: Noise Prohibited, is hereby amended to read as follows: (Note: Text which is stricken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Modify G(3)(b) as follows: G. Motor Vehicle Noise: b. Notwithstanding subsection G3a above, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit any idling whatsoever of the engine of any unattended bus, truck or any motor vehicle, except for refrigeration vehicles, within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1, Lionshead Mixed Use 2, Commercial Core 1 or the Commercial Core 2 Zone Districts of the Town. 15 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 Section 11. Title 12, Chapter 10, Section 12-10-16 (B): Exempt Areas; Parking Fund Establishment, is hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is stFicken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) B. Parking Fund: In Commercial Core 11 a44d Commercial Core 2, and Lionshead Mixed Use 1, property owners or applicants shall be required to contribute to the Town Parking Fund, hereby established, for the purpose of meeting the demand and requirements for vehicle parking. At such time as any property owner or other applicant proposes to develop or redevelop a parcel of property within an exempt area which would require parking and/or loading areas, the owner or applicant shall pay to the Town the parking fee hereinafter required. Section 12. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 13. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 14. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 15. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof,, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 16th day of March, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 6th day of April, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson,. Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 6th day of April, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk 16 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 MEMORANDUM o TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: March 8, 1999 SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7, Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail and a conditional use permit to . allow for a hotel redevelopment and the construction of the Gore Creek, Club, located at 714 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing and Lots C & D, Marcus Subdivision. Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz Architects, P.C. Planner: George Ruther 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS The applicant, HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by Henry Pratt of Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz Architects, is proposing a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7, Marriottt's Mountain Resort at Vail. The major amendment is intended to facilitate the redevelopment and remodel of the existing Marriottt Hotel and the construction of the new Gore Creek Club. The redevelopment and remodel of the existing Marriottt Hotel is intended to compliment the interior renovations recently completed in the hotel. The applicant is proposing to "re-skin" the exterior of the hotel, convert "Windows" restaurant to four condominiums (6,625 sq.ft.) and convert 8 hotel rooms to Type III Employee Housing Units. The proposed remodel is intended to bring the existing hotel building into compliance with the design guidelines prescribed by the recently adopted Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and increase the overall quality of the hotel. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 16 of the Zoning Regulations to allow for 66 interval ownership units in the Gore Creek Club. The new club will be constructed in Phase III of the Marriottt development area atop the existing parking structure. The club will be comprised of 66 lodging-type of units totaling approximately 75,000 square feet of GRFA. As an interval ownership club, the 66 units will be sold in 1/20th intervals. 1/20th intervals guarantees each owner approximately 17 days per year in the Vail Valley. The applicant anticipates offering owners the opportunity to exchange their club unit within the international exchange market. Other components of the new club include a full-time front desk for registration and reservations, an owner's lounge, a health club & spa facility, on-site laundry services and a 61 parking space F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Marrioti 1 1 MWN nF van. expansion to the existing parking structure. The 61 new spaces are intended to offset the increase in parking demand created by the construction of the new club. Approximately 1,912 square feet of retail space will be constructed on the north side of the club adjacent to West Lionshead Circle. A copy of the proposed interval ownership program is attached for reference. In addition to the improvements to the existing hotel and the construction of the new club, the applicant is also proposing site improvements to the property. Proposed site improvements include the removal of an existing landscape berm on the south side of the property to provide easy access to the creek and bike path, new landscaping on the south side of the hotel, a redesign of the existing loading and delivery area and the implementation of the recommended streetscape improvements along the south side of West Lionshead Circle. According to the Town of Vail Municipal Code, it shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that any deviation from the development standards of the underlying zoning provide public benefits that outweigh the adverse effect of said deviation. The applicant has identified the public benefits the community will realize as a result of the redevelopment of the Vail Village Inn site. The public benefits identified by the applicant include: 1. An increase in the annual hotel occupancy rate through the redevelopment of an older, existing hotel. 2. A significant increase in the Town's supply of short-term, overnight accommodations to serve our guests and visitors. 3. The creation of a commercial/retail space along West Lionshead Circle. 4. The implementation of the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan along West Lionshead Circle. 5. The construction of a world-class "anchor" hotel providing a high-level of guest service. 6. The implementation of the objectives stated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 7. The construction of employee housing to off-set the demand resulting from the redevelopment of the hotel project. 8. A sizeable annual contribution to the Town's sales tax revenue. 9. The partial elimination of an existing on-street loading and delivery area. II. BACKGROUND The establishment of Special Development District No.7, the Marriottt Vail Mountain Resort, was approved by Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1977, by the Vail Town Council. The expressed purpose for establishing SDD No. 7 was to allow for an increase in density beyond what was otherwise permitted by the underlying zoning of Public Accommodation and High Density Multi-Family. Public benefits realized since the approval of SDD No. 7 have been an increase in short-term rental units available to visitors of Vail and an increase in summer visitation due to the construction of a convention facility within the Marriottt Vail Mountain Resort. F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Marriott 1 2 Special Development District No. 7 has been amended since its establishment in 1976. The most recent amendment was in September of 1995. Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1995 permitted the conversion of seventeen dwelling units within the hotel to accommodation units and required that at least 294 parking spaces be provided in the structure. A building permit was issued by the Community Development Department and the dwelling units were converted and the parking structure was re-striped to accommodate 294 parking spaces. The existing Marriottt is a mixed use development. The current uses on the site include 14 dwelling units and approximately 320 hotel rooms, a restaurant and bar, convention and meeting room facilities and a minimal amount of retail/commercial space. According to the Official town of Vail Zoning Map, the applicant's property is zoned Special development District No. 7. The underlying zoning for SDD No. 7 is both Public Accommodation and High Density Multi-family. Tract 1 (the parking structure site) is zoned High Density Multi- family and Tract 2 (the existing hotel) of the SDD is zoned Public Accommodation. Pursuant to the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the Public Accommodation Zone district is intended, " to provide sites for lodges and residential accommodations for visitors, together with such public and semi-public facilities and limited professional offices, medical facilities, private recreation, and related visitor oriented uses as may appropriately be located in the same district. The Public Accommodation District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with lodge uses, and to maintain the desirable resort qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. Additional nonresidential uses are permitted as conditional uses which enhance the nature of Vail as a winter and summer recreation and vacation community, and where permitted are intended to function compatibly with the high density lodging character of the District. The Public Accommodation District is intended to provide sites for lodging units at densities not to exceed twenty five (25) dwelling units per acre." The High Density Multi-family Zone District is intended, "The High Density Multiple-Family District is intended to provide sites for multiple- family dwellings at densities to a maximum of twenty five (25) dwelling units per acre, together with such public and semi-public facilities and lodges, private recreation facilities and related visitor-oriented uses as may appropriately be located in the same district. The High Density Multiple-Family District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with high density apartment, condominium and lodge uses, and to maintain the desirable residential and resort qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. Certain nonresidential uses are permitted as conditional uses, which relate to the nature of Vail as a winter and summer recreation and vacation community and, where permitted, are intended to blend harmoniously with the residential character of the District." F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Marnott1 3 According to Section 12-6H-3, Conditional Uses, time share units shall be permitted in the High Density Multi-family Zone District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of the Zoning Regulations., Pursuant to Section 12-16-1 of the Zoning Regulations, the purpose of a conditional use permit is to, "in order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this Title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review and evaluation so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this Title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this Chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties and the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to ensure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied." III. ZONING ANALYSIS The development standards for a Special Development District shall be proposed by the applicant. Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking and loading shall be determined by the Town Council as part of the approved development plan, with consideration of the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it shall be determined that such deviations provide benefits to the Town that outweigh the effects of such deviations. This determination is to be made based upon the evaluation of the proposed Special Development District's compliance with the Review Criteria outlined in the following section. In addition, the staff has evaluated the project for compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The development area is within the overall study area of the Plan which is discussed in detail in Chapter 4. The Community Development Department staff has prepared a Zoning Analysis for the Gore Creek Club and the proposed remodel to the existing hotel. The Zoning Analysis compares the development standards outlined by the underlying zoning of Public Accommodation and High Density Multi-family to the applicant's proposed major amendment. The proposed deviations from the development standards of the underlying zoning are indicated in BOLD. F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Marriott 1 4 Marriottt Hotel Zoning: Public Accommodation Lot size: 3.5 acres or 152,666 sq. ft. Development Underlying Zoning 1999 Major SDD Proposed Standard of Public Accommodation Amendment proposal Lionshead Zoning GRFA: 80% or 122,132 sq. ft. 88% or 134,000 sq. ft. Dwelling units per acre:. 25 du/acre 52 du/acre Site coverage: 55% or 83,966 sq. ft. 56 % or 83,997 sq. ft. Setbacks: front: 20' per the development sides: 20' plan rear: 20' Height: 48' sloping 122.83' sloping Parking: per T.O.V. Code Section 294 parking spaces Loading: per T.O.V. Code Section three berths on-site 12-10-13 GORE CREEK CLUB Zoning: High Density Multi-family Lot size:1.58 acres or 68,861 sq.ft. Development Underlying Zoning 1999 Major SDD Standard of High Density Multi-family Amendment proposal GRFA: 80% or 55,089 sq. ft. 105 % or 72,395 sq. ft. Dwelling units per acre: 25 du/acre 42 du/acre Site coverage: 55% or 37,873 sq. ft. 67 % or 46,245 sq. ft. Setbacks: front: 20' per the development sides: 20' plan rear: 20' Height: 48' sloping 71' average per the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Parking: per T.O.V. Code Section 61 parking spaces F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Marriott1 5 Loading: per T.O.V. Code Section no loading/delivery berths on-site 12-10-13 IV. THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAJOR AMENDMENT PROCESS Chapter 12-9 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code provides for the amendment of existing Special Development Districts in the Town of Vail. According to Section 12-9A-1, the purpose of a Special Development District is, "To encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land, in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development within the Town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Special Development District, in conjunction with the properties underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the Special Development District." According to Section 12-9A-2, a major amendment to a Special Development District is defined as, "Any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential floor area; change the number of dwelling or accommodation units; modify, enlarge or expand any approved special development district (other than "minor amendments" as defined in this Section), except as provided under Sections 12-15-4, "Interior Conversions", or 12-15-5, "Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance)" of this Title." The Municipal Code provides a framework for the amendment of an established Special Development District. According to the Municipal Code, prior to site preparation, building construction, or other improvements to land within a Special Development District, there shall be an approved development plan for the Special Development District. The approved development plan establishes requirements regulating development, uses and activity within the Special Development District. Upon final review of a proposed major amendment of an existing Special Development District, a report from the Planning and Environmental Commission stating its findings and recommendations and a staff report shall be forwarded to the Town Council, in accordance with the provisions listed in Section 12-16-6 of the Municipal Code. The Town Council's consideration of the Special Development District shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and approved by two readings of an ordinance. An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities of the Special Development District. The development plan shall contain all relevant material and information necessary to establish the parameters with which the Special Development District shall adhere. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site plan, floor plans, building sections and elevations, vicinity plan, parking plan, preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted, conditional and accessory uses. F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Marriott1 6 The determination of permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council as part of the formal review of the proposed development plan. Unless further restricted through the review of the proposed Special Development District, permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be limited to those permitted, conditional and accessory uses in the properties underlying zone district. The Municipal Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating the merits of the proposed major amendment to a Special Development District. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. The staff has addressed each of the nine SDD review criteria below: A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. The proposed redevelopment of the exterior of the Marriottt Mountain Resort at Vail and the Gore Creek Club are consistent with the redevelopment objectives outlined in the recently adopted Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The exterior building materials of the Marriottt Hotel are a mixture of stone, stucco and wood. The roof material is proposed to be asphalt shingles. Stone will be used around the base of the building. The applicant has proposed that the exterior stucco color be an off-white. Staff believes that the combination of building materials proposed has been well incorporated into the design of the Marriottt Hotel. The exterior building materials of the Gore Creek Club are also a mixture of stone, stucco and wood. The roof material will be asphalt shingles. The Town of Vail Design Review Board will have the opportunity to review the building exteriors prior to final approval of the hotel and new club. The height of the hotel exceeds the allowable building height of the Public Accommodation Zone District by approximately 75 feet. The development standards for the underlying zone district indicate that the maximum height for buildings with sloping roofs shall be 48 feet. The height of the existing building is 85 feet. The applicant is requesting that the maximum building height for the Marriottt Hotel be approximately 123 feet tall, to accommodate the two towers, which are intended to break up the mass of the structure. The height of the Gore Creek Club exceeds the height limitation prescribed for the High density Multi-family Zone District. The maximum allowable height per the zoning regulations is 48'. The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of 82.5 feet. The average height of the building, as measured along the primary roof forms is less than 71 feet. The proposed height is consistent with height considerations outlined in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Staff believes that the proposed height of each of the buildings is reasonable and appropriate. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The existing Marriottt Hotel and the proposed Gore Creek Club are bordered to the north by the Vail Spa Condominiums and the Enzian Condominiums, to the south by the Gore Creek stream corridor and Primary/Secondary Residential development, to the west by a F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Nlarriott1 7 vacant development site currently used for surface parking and to the east by the Antler's Condominiums, the Montaneros Condominiums and the commercial spaces in the Concert Hall Plaza Building. The applicant is proposing a mixed-use development that is in compliance with the uses allowed in the underlying zone districts. The underlying zoning of Public Accommodation and High Density Multi-family encourages the development of lodges (accommodation units) and accessory eating, drinking and retail establishments. The interval ownership component of the Gore Creek Club is allowed in the High Density Multi-family Zone District subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. A complete staff review of the conditional use permit criteria can be found in Section V of this memorandum. The proposed uses comply with the proposed zoning for Lionshead and the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Employee Housing Requirements As indicated in a number of the goals and objectives of the Town's Master Plans, providing affordable housing for employees is a critical issue which should be addressed through the planning process for Special Development District proposals. In reviewing the proposal for employee housing needs, staff relied on the Town of Vail Employee Housing Report. This report has been used by the staff in the past to evaluate employee housing needs. The guidelines contained within the report were used most recently in the review of the Austria Haus development proposal. The Employee Housing Report, was prepared for the Town by the consulting firm Rosall, Remmen and Cares. The report provides the recommended ranges of employee housing units needed based on the type of use and the amount of floor area dedicated to each use. Utilizing the guidelines prescribed in the Employee Housing Report, the staff analyzed the incremental increase of employees (square footage per use), that result from the redevelopment. A copy of the Suggested Employment Categories and Ranges for Vail Expressed as Employees per 1000 Square Feet has been attached for reference. The figures identified in the Housing Report are based on surveys of commercial-use employment needs of the Town of Vail and other mountain resort communities. For comparison purposes, Telluride, Aspen and Whistler B.C. all have "employment generation" ordinances requiring developers to provide affordable housing for a percentage of the "new" employees resulting from commercial development. "New" employees are defined as the incremental increase in employment needs resulting from commercial redevelopment. Each of the communities assesses a different percentage of affordable housing a developer must provide for the "new" employees. For example, Telluride requires developers to provide housing for 40% (0.40) of the "new" employees, Aspen requires that 60% (0.60) of the "new" employees are provided housing and Whistler requires that 100% (1.00) of the "new" employees be provided housing by the developer. In comparison, Vail has conservatively determined that developers shall provide housing for 15% (0.15) or 30% (0.30) of the ,new" employees resulting from commercial development. When a project is proposed to exceed the density allowed by the underlying zone district, the 30% (0.30) figure is used in the calculation. If a project is proposed at, or below, the density allowed by the underlying zone district, the 15% (0.15) figure is used. The Vail Plaza Hotel special development district major amendment proposal exceeds the density permitted by the underlying zone district, and therefore, the 30% figure shall be used. F:\everyone\pec\memos\99\Marriott 1 8 EMPLOYEE HOUSING GENERATION ANALYSIS The staff analysis below indicates the top, the middle and the bottom of the ranges recommended by the Town of Vail Employee Housing Report, as well as a staff recommended figure which was used in determining the employee housing needs of the Gore Creek Club. A summary of the Employee Housing Generation Analysis is as follows: Bottom of Range Calculations: a) Retail/Service Commercial =1,912 sq. ft. @(5/1000 sq. ft.) = 9.56 employees b) Multi Family (Club Units) =66 units @(.4/unit) =26.40 employees Total Employees 35.96 = employees (X 0.30 multiplier) 10.79 = new employees Middle of Range Calculations: a) Retail/Service Commercial = 1,912 sq. ft. @(6.5/1000 sq. ft.) = 12.43 employees b) Multi Family (Club Units) = 66 units @(.4/unit) = 26.40 employees Total Employees = 38.83 employees (X 0.30 multiplier) = 11.65 new employees Top of Range Calculations: a) Retail/Service Commercial = 1,912 sq. ft. @(8/1000 sq. ft.) = 15.30 employees b) Multi Family (Club Units) = 66 units @(.4/unit) = 26.40 employees Total Employees = 41.70 employees (X 0.30 multiplier) = 12.51 new employees Staff Recommended Range Calculations: The staff believes that the Gore Creek Club will create a need for 36 additional employees. Of the 36 additional employees, at least 11(10.78) employees (30%) will need to be provided deed- restricted housing by the developers of the Vail Plaza Hotel. The staff recommended range is based on: 1. the type of retail and commercial use proposed in the commercial space within the Gore Creek Club; 2. the size of the Gore Creek Club lodging component; 3. the result of research completed by Town of Vail staff of similar hotel operations in the Vail Valley. 9 a) Retail/Service Commercial = 1,912 sq. ft. @(5/1000 sq. ft.) = 9.56 employees (bottom of range) b) Multi Family (Club Units) =66 units @(.4/unit) = 26.40 employees (range does not vary) Total = 35.96 employees (X 0.30 multiplier) = 10.78 new employees Lodging has a particularly large variation of employees per room, depending upon factors such as size of facility and level of service/support services and amenities provided. Depending upon the size of the employee housing unit provided, it is possible to have up to two employees per bedroom. For example, a two-bedroom unit in the size range of 450 - 900 square feet, is possible of accommodating three to four employees. These figures are consistent with the requirements for the Type III employee housing units outlined in the Municipal Code. The applicant has proposed to provide a minimum of six employee housing units. The units would be deed-restricted as Type III ehu's and located on the garden level of the Marriottt Hotel. Of the six units, three would be one bedroom units and three would be studio units. The applicant is proposing two employees in each of the one bedroom units and one employee in each of the studio units. A total of nine employees would be provided housing. Overall, staff believes that the density and uses proposed by the applicant for the Marriottt and the Gore Creek Club do not conflict with the compatibility, efficiency or workability of the surrounding uses and/or activities. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 12-10 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Parking and loading requirements for development are established in Chapter 12-10 of the Municipal Code. The parking and loading requirements are based on the square footage of the uses proposed within a building. The applicant is proposing a total of three loading/delivery berths. The loading/delivery area is existing on the north side of the hotel and has been redesigned to accommodate three trucks. This area can handle trucks up.to 50-feet in length. Additionally, an on- street loading and delivery area has been. reduced in size to help alleviate conflicts with cars and buses. The on-street space is intended only for temporary, short-term parking should the three on site spaces be occupied. Another loading/delivery area is located on the west side of the hotel between the hotel and the Gore Creek Club. This area is intended only for use of the conference space inside the hotel. It is not designed to accommodate deliveries to the hotel. No loading/delivery area has been provided for the use of the Gore Creek Club. The staff has reviewed the proposed loading/delivery plan. Upon review of the plan we believe the proposal does not meet the minimum standards for loading/delivery for the hotel and the new club. While we understand that the applicant is limited by the existing configuration and layout of the hotel, we believe it is necessary for the loading/delivery situation to be resolved with this redevelopment proposal. According to the loading/delivery standards outlined in the Municipal Code, a minimum of five berths are required. At a minimum, loading/delivery needs to be provided in a realistic manner for the Gore Creek Club. Should the Gore Creek Club ever become a stand alone building 10 from the Marriottt, minimum standards would not be met. D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plan. Vail Land Use Plan The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to be used as the Town's policy guidelines during the review process for a major amendment to an existing special development district. Staff has reviewed the Vail Land Use Plan and believes the following policies are relevant to the review of this proposal: 1. General Growth/Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water, and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgrade whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill). 3. Commercial 3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more efficiently. 3.2 The Village and Lionshead are the best location for hotels to serve the future needs of the destination skier. 3.3 Hotels are important to the continued success of the Town of Vail, therefore conversion to condominiums should be discouraged. 3.4 Commercial growth should be concentrated in existing commercial areas to accommodate both local and visitor needs. 4. Village Core/Lionshead 4.1 Future commercial development should continue to occur primarily in existing commercial areas. Future commercial development in the Core areas needs to be carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery. 4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is preserved through the implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. 11 5. Residential 5.1 Quality timeshare units should be accommodated to help keep occupancy rates up. 5.2 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions. The Vail Land Use Plan projects a need for additional lodging units in the Town of Vail. While the statistical information used to project need is most likely, outdated, .staff believes there continues to be a need for additional lodging units in the Town of Vail. The Plan projected a need for a total of 395 additional lodging units by the year 2000. The Plan further suggests that increased density for commercial, residential and lodging uses in the Village/Lionshead Core areas would be acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is being preserved. Staff believes the proposed major amendment of Special Development District (#7) is in concert with the goals and policies of the Vail Land Use Plan as outlined above. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan was adopted by the Vail Town Council in December of 1998. The purpose of the plan is to encourage redevelopment and new development initiatives within the Lionshead area. The plan outlines the goals and objectives for the enhancement of Lionshead and proposes recommendations, incentives and requirements for redevelopment and new development. Chapter Four of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan identifies issues and provides recommendations that need to be considered in all planning and policy decisions as Lionshead redevelops. The applicant's properties are located in what is identified in the plan as the Resort Lodging Hub. This area is located just west of the Lionshead Commercial Core and is comprised of mostly high-density residential development. All future plans and proposals should work to reinforce the residential character of the area. New development should aim for quieter pedestrian streets, well-defined pedestrian connections and more intensive landscaping and higher quality streetscape development. The plan further suggests that new development be constructed on a north-south orientation to improve physical, visual and sun access to the buildings and the streets below. The plan proposes improvements to the intersection of West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. Currently, this intersection handles heavy loads of traffic for lodging and service deliveries. The plan suggests the elimination of on-street loading and delivery and an improved pedestrian area at the intersection. To this end, the plan recommends that loading and delivery areas be deep enough into the building or property to prevent delivery trucks from blocking vehicle or pedestrian traffic. The plan further recommends that these areas be landscaped and/or screened to improve the aesthetic quality of the streetscape. In no case, however, shall a property utilize the public roadway or pedestrian area to stage service and delivery vehicles. 12 Lastly, in Chapter Four, the plan encourages the creation of landmark features in Lionshead. A landmark feature is a significant architectural element that all visitors to Lionshead can identify and remember. Landmarks signify important points entry, critical intersections in the pedestrian network, as well as destinations and visual reference points. Appropriate locations for landmark features are the east pedestrian portal, the central retail mall area and the west pedestrian portal in the vicinity of the intersection of West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. Chapter Five of the plan provides detailed recommendations based upon the examination of individual parcels of land in the Lionshead area. The intent of the examination. is to identify important objectives for redevelopment of specific parcels in Lionshead. The recommendations for the Marriottt property are listed below: 5.13 The Marriottt With approximately 320 rooms, the Marriottt is the only supply of hot beds in Lionshead. The single largest structure in Lionshead, it is also very visible, especially from the west. It is consequently a high priority renovation project, and all reasonable measures should be taken by the Town of Vail to encourage and facilitate its enhancement. Specific issues regarding this property are as follows: 5.13.1 Redevelopment or Development of the Parking Structure The best opportunity for new development on the Marriottt property is the existing parking structure (figure 5-17). If this site is developed, attention should be given to the relationship between the development, Gore Creek, the Gore Creek recreation path, and the west day lot. Vertical development should step back from the recreation path, and there should be a clear separation (most likely a landscape buffer) between the public space of the recreation path and the private space of the residential units. 5.13.2 Infill Opportunities There are several tennis courts on the south side of the Marriottt. This area presents an opportunity for low-rise infill development, that eases the visual and physical transition from the existing structure to the Gore Creek recreation path. 5.13.3 Opportunities for Fagade Renovation Exterior renovation of the Marriottt is a community priority, but the size and dimensions of the structure present a challenge, and it is unlikely that the architectural design guidelines (see Chapter 8) can be fully met. However, this should not discourage exterior renovation, and the Town of Vail Design Review. Board should insure that the intent of the guidelines is met. (This is a basic premise of the architectural design guidelines, relevant to all existing buildings in Lionshead). 5.13.4 West Lionshead Circle in Front of the Marriottt Any future development or redevelopment of the Marriottt property should include 13 a continuous secondary pedestrian walk on the south side of West Lionshead Circle. A pavement snowmelt system is strongly recommended because of icing problems on the walkway in winter. Chapter Eight of the plan prescribes the architectural design guidelines for redevelopment and new development in Lionshead. The intent of the guidelines is to direct the growth of the community through distinct levels of perception, from views of the neighborhood from the mountain and highway, to perceptions within its pedestrian streets, to the detail level of artistry and ornamentation on the structures themselves. Staff believes that it is most appropriate for the Town of Vail Design Review Board to review the plan for compliance with Chapter Eight of the plan. Overall, staff believes that the applicant's proposal complies with the various provisions of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The proposal addresses landscape improvements, exterior fagade improvements to the existing hotel, pedestrian improvements both to and from the street, lodging improvements utilizing infill development and the creation of a landmark feature to help identify the western portal to Lionshead. The applicant has also proposed to enhance the pedestrian experience at the intersection of West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place by proposing new activity generating commercial uses on the corner. If there is an area where staff believes the applicant's proposal may fail to comply with the plan, it is in the design and operation of the loading and delivery area. Staff believes that the loading and delivery area should be redesigned to insure an adequate number of berths to accommodate service and delivery vehicles to prevent loading and delivery from the public right of way and to insure that the berths are adequately designed to prevent service and delivery vehicles from impeding traffic flows. Additionally, at a minimum, loading and delivery facilities should be designed into the Gore Creek Club so that the club can operate as a stand alone building should it ever need to be. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. There are no natural and/or geologic hazards that effect the applicant's property. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The applicant has proposed to deviate from the setbacks prescribed by the underlying zoning. The underlying zoning prescribes 20-foot setbacks at the exterior lot lines. The applicant is proposing a seven foot setback from the west property, zero setbacks at the ground level on the east and north property lines, and more than 50 feet from the centerline of Gore Creek. The proposed setbacks allow for a minimal landscape buffer to be planted around the perimeter of the Gore Creek Club. The setbacks for the existing . hotel remain unchanged. The applicant has maintained a 20 foot building separation between the buildings on the interior of the development. The building setbacks allow for the required building separation and provide adequate pedestrian-traffic circulation. The proposed zoning for Lionshead and the master plan requires 10' setback along the west property line. The applicant is proposing to exchange two portions of Town of Vail right of way for additional stream tract area. The areas in question are at the front entrance to the Gore 14 Creek Club and at the eastern end of the Marriottt hotel. The exchange of land would be on a square foot-to-square foot basis. The applicant believes that the exchange would result in a win/win situation for both the Town and the property owner. The applicant has submitted a detailed sun/shade analysis. The purpose of the analysis is to illustrate the impacts of the redevelopment of the existing hotel and the construction of the new club the public right-of-way and adjacent properties. While the increased building heights will increase the amount of shading on the areas to the north of the development site, staff believes the increases are minimal and will not have any negative impacts on existing or future development. A copy of the sun/shade analysis has been attached for reference. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. Staff believes that the proposal complies with the circulation system criteria described above. The applicant has worked closely with the Town Engineer to design a circulation system that is both functional and efficient. As stated previously, with the exception of the front entry drop-off spaces under the porte cochere, all of the parking will be in an underground structure. The applicant will also provide a much needed sidewalk along the south side of West Lionshead Circle connecting the pedestrian traffic to the South Frontage Road. The proposed vehicle and pedestrian traffic circulation plan complies with the recommendation outlined in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. The applicant is proposing to implement landscape improvements around the existing hotel and around the new club. As part of the improvements, the applicant will be providing a pedestrian connection from the hotel and club down to the streamwalk. Staff would recommend that the applicant increase the landscaping and enhance the streetscape at the entrance to the new club. No landscaping is currently proposed in this area. The staff would suggest that the final landscape plan be reviewed and approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board. 1. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Phasing of development is not proposed. The applicant is required to submit a construction phasing and staging plan to the Town prior to receiving a building permit. The plan will be used to ensure an efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses during the redevelopment of the hotel and the construction of the club. V CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The following criteria are to be used by the Planning & Environmental Commission to when evaluating a request for a conditional use permit. 15 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. The applicant's property is located in an area identified as the Resort Lodging Hub of Lionshead. This area is characterized by residential and lodging-type of development intended to provide accommodation for our guest, residents and visitors. A long standing goal of Vail as a resort community is to maintain and enhance the short-term overnight accommodations. A substantial hotel bedbase is critical to the continued success of our resort market. There are many means of maintaining and enhancing the short-term overnight accommodations. The obvious is to build strictly hotel rooms. A second means is timeshare and other forms of interval ownership. The possible benefits of timeshare include: ? Increased activity during shoulder seasons ? The attraction of revenue generating tourists ? Efficient utilization of resources ? Pride ownership and buy-in to the community ? Increased levels of occupancy Increased resort exposure due to the extensive number of interval owners Reduced cost of property ownership in a resort community Overall,. staff believes that the applicant's proposal to construct 66 1/20th interval ownership units in the Gore Creek Club is positive. Interval ownership units and the use thereof are compatible with existing and surrounding uses. Staff does not believe that the proposed conditional use will not have any negative impacts on the character of the area. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities and other public facility needs. Staff does not believe that the request to construct and operate an interval ownership club will have any negative impacts on the above described criteria over strictly accommodation units. With increased occupancy comes possible increased use of our public facilities. Facilities such as bus system, streamwalk, bike paths, etc. Staff does not believe, however, that the increased use will be detrimental. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and snow removal from the street and parking area. Similar to the criteria #2, staff does not believe that the proposed use will have any negative impacts on the above described criteria. A. Necessary Findings: The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of this Title and the purposes of the district in which the site 16 9 1 is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this Title. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Major Amendment The Community Development Department recommends approval of the applicant's request for a major amendment to Special Development District #7, Marriottt, to allow for redevelopment of the existing hotel and the new construction of the Gore Creek Club. Staff's recommendation for approval is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section IV of this memorandum. The staff believes that the proposal is in generally complies with the nine design criteria, as identified in this memorandum. Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to recommend approval of the requested major amendment to the Vail Town Council, staff would recommend that the Commission make the following finding: That the proposed major amendment to Special Development District #7, Marriottt, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Additionally, the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission that any adverse effects of the requested deviation from the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided. Conditional Use Permit Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to approve the request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction and operation of a interval ownership club, staff would recommend that the following finding be made: That the construction and operation of the 66 interval ownership units in the Gore Creek Club adheres to the purpose statements of the High Density Multi-family Zone District and of a conditional use permit as stated in the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Additionally, the construction and operation of the Gore Creek Club will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to the to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Club. Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to recommend approval of the requested major amendment, staff would recommend that the approval carry with it the following conditions: 1. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of Community Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application for the 17 R hotel: a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan; b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan; C. A Stormwater Management Plan; and e. A Traffic Control Plan. 2. That the applicant provide deed-restricted housing, which complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13), for a minimum of 10 employees, and that said deed-restricted housing be made available for occupancy, and the deed restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a . Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Gore Creek Club. 3. That the applicant appear before the Design Review Board for a conceptual review of the proposed improvements prior to appearing before the Vail Town Council for consideration of an ordinance amending the Special Development District and receive final Design Review Board approval of the proposed improvements, prior to application for a building permit. 4. That the applicant redesign the proposed loading/delivery plan to insure that service and delivery vehicles do not block or impede pedestrian and vehicle traffic. 5. That the applicant redesign the proposed plans for the Gore Creek Club to provide a minimum of one off-street loading/delivery berth so the Gore Creek Club can operate as a free-standing facility. 6. That the applicant submit a complete set of civil engineer drawings of all the off-site improvements, including improvements to West Lionshead Circle, the sidewalk from the common property line with Antler's to the South Frontage Road, for the required on-site and off-site storm water drainage and management system, for the pedestrian connection to the streamwalk, for review and approval, prior to application for a building permit. 7. That the applicant submit to the Community Development Department an approval letter from the owner of Lot A to the west of the Gore Creek Club development site granting permission to regrade portions of Lot A as depicted on the proposed plans. 8. That the applicant submit to the Community Development Department an approval letter from the owner of Lot A to the west of the Gore Creek Club development site granting permission to regrade portions of Lot A as depicted on the proposed plans. 9. That the applicant meet with the Town Staff to prepare a letter of agreement outlining the requirements of the off-site improvements, prior to first reading of an ordinance approving the major amendment. 10. That the new sidewalk along the south side of West Lionshead Circle be snowmelted. 11. That the applicant amend the proposed landscape plan and provide increased amount of landscaping at the front entrance to the Gore Creek Club and the retail shops. 12. That the applicant submit a proposed streambank improvement plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to application for a building permit. 18 s Architects, p C. - 1000 S. Fronta~le Road Wes Vail, Colorado 81657 Tel: 4 (970) 476-1147 Fax: .(970) 476-1612 December 2, 1998 February 7, 1999 (revised) George Ruther Town of Vail Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail- major amendment to SDD George: Subsequent to our pre-application meeting on 10/19/98, before making a formal application and accordance with the new policy, we would like to schedule a joint meeting with the PEC, Town Council and possibly even the DRB as early in January 1999 as possible. As requested, here is a synopsis of what exists at the hotel and what is being proposed. Subsequent to our pre-application hearing on January 12, 1999, the project remains as presented except that the location and number of EHU's has been revised. Existing Hotel The existing hotel is comprised of 3 buildings of varying age and construction. We refer to them as Phase I, Phase II and Phase Ila and the west Parking structure. Uses in the Hotel are AU, DU, commercial, various food service operations, and convention. For the purposes of our project, we will address only the uses of AU, DU and one particular restaurant space. Prints of each building's original design documents are in your archives under different names. The following information is based on these documents (I would like to point out that many of the units defined as DU's are owned by the Hotel and are operated as AU's). The current unit mix is as follows: Phase AU DU GRFA 1 74 14 38,380 II 97 12 48,212 Ila 35 27 50,555 Total 206 53 137,147 George Ruther February 7, 1999 (revised from December 2, 1999) Page 2 Lot area (including the parking structure) is approximately 222,273 SF. Under PA zoning, allowable GRFA would be 80% of that or 177,818 SF. Existing GRFA is therefore 77% of allowable. The "Windows" restaurant, with a seating capacity of approximately 85 seats, is no longer in operation and is used only for special functions. Existing parking is located below the buildings and in the west structure. By count, there are 407 spaces with 205 in the west structure. We are assuming that existing parking is adequate and will be "grandfathered" in as such. Proposed New Construction & Changes 1. Convert the "Windows" restaurant space and 5 adjacent AU's into 3 or 4 DU's. Parking requirements decrease by 1.6 spaces (85 seats/8 seats per space less 4 spaces (2 units < 2000 SF) and 5 spaces (2 units > 2000 SF)). 2. Upgrade exterior appearance of existing hotel buildings by doing the following: a. Add steeply sloped roofs to lower the eave lines of the various buildings. Roofing material proposed to be 40 year shadow-line type fiberglass shingles. b. Add "landmark" roof elements to buildings II and Ila. C. Remove wood siding at balconies on all buildings and install new metal railings in various colors and patterns. d. Remove most of the existing wood siding and replace with EIFS in several colors. e. Repaint existing stucco. f. Existing standing seam metal roofs remain to a large extent. g. Add new retail spaces with heated sidewalks along West Lionshead Circle at Phase I and Phase II when future economic conditions warrant. h. Remodel existing porte cochere. 3. New Phase III atop existing west parking structure with interval ownership units in accordance with the Lionshead Master Plan. a. 66 new units (see unit mix table below) totaling approximately 75,000 SF of GRFA. Current drawings reflect the following unit mix and area: Number Unit type GRFA 50 1050 SF 2 BR 52,500 12 1450 SF 3 BR (2 BR w/ loft) 17,400 4 Studio units 2529 66 72,429 b. Building amenities including front desk and Owner lounges. C. Addition to parking structure with internal ramps and providing for completely covered arrival. 61 new parking spaces with an easy additional 15 via valet positioning. George Ruther February 7, 1999 (revised from December 2, 1999) Page 3 4. Converting 9 existing DU's in Phase Ila into deed restricted EHU's; 8 units are studios with minimal kitchens and one unit is a one bedroom unit with full kitchen. Based on a recently completed project of similar size, the Phase Ill addition will create 25 new jobs. At a requirement of 20% of this number, 5 new EHU's are required. Instead of the 9 units in Phase Ila being deed restricted, we are now proposing to convert. the existing ski shop in Phase l into 6 new studio and one bedroom units (3 of each) ranging in size from 390 SF to 520 SF. 5. Modifications to landscape on Gore Creek side of complex including removal of most of the existing high berm thus opening up to the bike path and the creekscape. One tennis court to remain, the other one and the volley ball court will go. Other modifications per the submitted plans. Proposed total GRFA would be 209,576 SF or 118 % of the total allowable on the site. This is far less than the 250% maximum that would govern in Lionshead and even less than the 150% granted the Austria House in the Village. Compliance with Lionshead Master Plan and Design Guidelines- November 17 issue Existing Buildings: 1. Proposed modifications to roofs comply with the design guidelines even though the proposed slope exceeds 12:12; the steeper roofs will lower apparent eaves, balance roof area with wall area. 2. The proposed "landmark" roof elements will give the western edge of Lionshead the presence of a "grand old hotel". 3. Proposed streetscape elements do comply with the Plan and guidelines. New Building: 1. New building is right at maximum height limits with the proposed steeply sloped roofs and small areas of flat roof. We are well below the roof height average required. 2. Our proposed 15:12 roof pitch is steeper than the 12:12 specified but again provides significant aesthetic advantages the satisfy the intent of the guidelines: lower eave heights and wall heights and a better balance between wall area and roof area. This aesthetic benefit and addressing of intent is the basis for which we would seek conditional approval as provided in Section 4.2.8.3. As for the small areas of flat roof, they are comparable to those found at the Sonnenalp and would be visible only from high on the mountain. They are also allowed under Section 4.2.8.1. 3. The issue of height and flat roofs could be resolved if the datum for measuring height is set at the top of the existing parking garage instead of at surrounding grade. We have an unusual case here for new construction in that we do not have the option of putting the structure completely below grade as could be done with other new buildings. George Ruther February 7, 1999 (revised from December Z 1999) Page 4 I hope this gives you an adequate overview of our project. We look forward to the meeting with the Council and PEC and a subsequently smooth approval process. We could reluctantly accept staff approval on this one if required to do so. Sincerely, GWATHMEY PRATT A CHITECTS, P.C. d~ Henry R. Pratt, AIA • - • Architects, p.c. 1000 S. Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Tel: ;(970) 476- 1 147 Fax: (970) 4 76-161 2 February 7, 1999 George Ruther Town of Vail Community Development Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail- major amendment to SDD- Conditional Use Permit George: Subsequent to our discussion last Friday, we are applying for a conditional use permit to allow time-share units at the proposed Phase III addition to the Marriott Hotel in Lionshead. This application does not change the building or its bulk and mass in any way from that presented to the Council and PEC on January 12, 1999 and recently submitted for approval by the PEC. Nor does it change in any way the impacts associated with this project (light, air, Town objectives, traffic, etc). It merely seeks permission to sell the units in a manner that is consistent with the current market and this project's location. I will point out that both fractional fee units and time-share units are conditional uses allowed under HDMF zoning with no stated preference of one over the other. The Phase III component of the Marriott project is stated as a.high priority project in the Lionshead master plan. Regardless of whether it is approved as an amendment to an existing SDD or as an exterior alteration under the new Lionshead zoning, what we are proposing will provide higher occupancy rates and more warm beds than a condominium (HDMF) project. For this reason alone, this conditional use permit for time-share under HDMF should be approved. A further explanation of why time-share is desirable is attached. Sincerely, G ATHMEY P ATT CHULTZ ARCHITECTS, P.C. J Henry R. att, AIA ~y~sl ss Gwottvney ROM ' SchWh t +~o II~I'I I~.~.i II•~11 150 t ijlll!r.l ':j;ul!I:IIIII I'~ „Sr... eGv~ I pp • pit.4c l IO~S~~po cl D ? 1e 8 o r'~ ally WESt l , , ' Y/ ru 9 PNASE nUA 9r ur~r+ ~ ~ ! 3 . r uo+ [ I .vim i fir ~ k_ rl t \ \ CONEfRENCE c"WER i ~ •x°u t~ Ilulll~l h;l!I II I I'. I ~J Ili Ir,° PHASE 400111ON ` III 1~~ 4 Itq 14 ~~1\ col 0 ~ I III'I 'hhil~j.IIIIIIIilt~ll!{•I •~~h~ ~ v 1 I I RuhII LII !I ,Pn T I\ t. >0.. PHASE I M11'e ' : I l r~~ j o aT efsn 1'I 70 0 ~2'BBIe03 r r ~op ~f , aow oe r~ as gam, PROPOSED 51TE PLAN ell>~~ f~.~i / e oy / J~i'~`5 . ~ meet rombrr Gwalhmay Prafl Sc~ulh 1^ `50 111 I I ,.S.f... 1 Ill' ~III!1~111 :1i' 'll~' S~Epo `IPG~C cy 544 I s I I Flo PHASE.// 5 ; -:f _ o0 .1•'1'1 t ;r ~ B ~ 8 Iln Ip'I 191'!11!!'1' Il.i ; f I m ~ Z CONFERENCE CEN/ER Iv'v I 1 Vp}kk/;// .ate q• i rll'i h II'I' i~ll!i1411 t-r,., l peel b,; e~% / \ - , - m 1 ° ,X111!I'i~ljjj~Iljll!jlllljlljl~l!III!I / O it In I I~ it II II II Q ' ~ ! II ~ I!Ij~III1 ifpo~ Q 1 I'll it II III III,jI I I Q ..:1~ _ j ~IIIIpIII~II I1~ Ili!''I' ;I; /ON ll!II~IIIII1~1IIIII;,LI'Ilu!Ill~~l y PHASE a noon.=f.. h / 'o' O i i '1'r1i'IMICIl•I II'll 1 !IIII P 0000 v _ ~ it \ 'IIj~IIIIIiIIII'I l~~l;'ils!''jIIh II II III!IIIII IUI --I fe.P -'1~~~~~ ~ I41;~.II11.11o II.I II !1.I•II1~ 1 - J .I DR u TS ~~1 I > > PHASE 11 P~" QMOa Zp-;linv-1 % _ fry f1-v~llry i~ - _ jo. •a,~i"..as - '1 i ..,.111`n.6. d,~ Dota Oa KPH 99 _i --erao 1 t a76~1^'~~ _ PROPOSED LANDSCAPE I11 ROVECIENT5.PLAN' \ier~s hr*seY Schulte ru,..af itii' ,,e L 5o i li i; i'i1!~IrI 1i1j11q a_ "4P PUnsE l j Io15~Erocl jlllijii!1!~I!~!IIIIii1111'!11!11 LU a lfl rE5 ' A (Y . - e Z °f r°rFw~ PHASE 11`illl '•"i 1,11 1{.1 ~ s 01, :{w. _ ~ I• 11111 I u"1' Fb !%y~~~'y'' / CONFERENCE CCN/ER I Irl!j 11111'1 I h16' i a=d\ I'h'. 'I 11 rt F •`d \r F Ili 1111111;~1'll lilli~ii 1111 r ~ "4 ~ R j;~I~'!ij~li; lili'Illj'llrl•~I:Y-a /fi' ; / ~ Q \ 3 ° th''lllll I~j41.11:'!1?I ° 1, :1•Il'L 1'li'llll•11111 .p~ X Q PARKIN; SIRUC7UFE PHASE AODl7/ON 0 IIIII~II II',11!II~Ii1113;11'. ~.lil~ I 1 1 1 ~l _ o ° _ 1 I I,i~ ICI IIj1 •IIIIII'1'1 ,1 `si I~ i - _I 1 1 I:ii. 1 ~1'I' I Ii ;r. lq . I jN l \ III Ia ;I I? al p' ~ ~ s- 1'I I l-I s AID \ ~ IE I NM11 Ills d' I I s: i5~ rr±•!'-'`S'..a' . -NO OOwms Gbtw as an EXISTING SITE PLAN bh e r 1~ I 7Z-1 e1r 7 N:_ 91rst rtmbsr • Gwathmey Pratt SchWh f 16/12 .r ,1ft• II ~ ® ~ ,r 2r7 _i ,,Y~1Sff. ~;It. r,.. ~ j:. ~ .r~~ LLI I!,lu l ll,: 1111; 11 it t p z 13 4f U 03 t m m m m M CM 1 - 'W.lG III .W.p! Ib IIMGt II MV.Y I O O PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PHASES-1 III Q -E, 1- 20 ~ V J CT ~T 0 Hill ;rr ? ssc 1 1 1 I it i II'I' I ('7~ r71IT1~.. ? ? m - fm.-1 r-:-7 ? Wr.~ oe r~ rl t, L:.I_J lS....YJ ? m l~ lIXEMP 11 0 m ?7 wo, m m In nwe III hK m ryM!! II FlNY I EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION PHASES I -III 1.2 • P wal~rney Schultz 16/12 12 s`Jii~ X91 ~a'~~~ ~~f~jL~4~f~'~i~~ ~•`Y ~S. _ li_, g Slng~ r- m n Z m m 1 0 g m 00 m z u u u u ~ ~ AMt! Ib /11~%,,, PROP05ED NORTH ELEVATION O PHASES I - III Qp 0 ..,a - -is ,a: In m i In! c m m O n.m..e. n .n m m m tD m .M.ee , ..wen m.ee ro .w.ae m EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION PHASE I - III „y!R . ~ / O C ,e Raftthmey ^ I QO LANDMARK - SchWiz LANDMARK .,.,..o 00 ' ~l.i%;'~` I. i 1 d U e6HAIL--P Z_ -BO t 'C In . /r0 ?P Oq~J'.. i E"NS VfdL IRD LODGE Z , SUNG r _ O Z O Ii lr~'rl ~ iI I - ,I; VI ~II IC`~..I/I _ / QOO 1• THE MARRIOTT P c~~\. ON SOUS L~ \.i ROOF PARKING THE MARE IOTT O / Q IONSHEAD Q A PARKING -~'CT ! ROOF PARKING r/ / \ tl O LION SQUARE 1r£'~"~_ . i~ 5 •O~Q( .1 ANTLER A\ I .f o i .I `Q yc;;. o SPRING/FALL EQUINOX 10:00 AM d:.^^ MARCH 21/5EPTEMBER 23 A1.4a SUN/SHADE ANALYSIS -EXISTING BUILDINGS ' - , % - ~e Gwothmey O _ Draft I LANDMARK SChulh LANDMARK ao I , CIO, 1 I fl I • e~ (JI eo j r i iGPL-AZ +IAL " b I I 1 O LLI rL/ SUNRIRD LODGE Z O J a~ ' ~ ~ ~F,(y0 IRCLE or It WEST._LIONSHEAD C i , r POOLI • O - L o THE p\~ S°V QI} n~ Q +I;I 1 I./ ! Opp < MARRIOTT i. - . 1 - ROOF \ O (o C' ~'"a\~- J PARKING \1 V 16'IT ti O ARKING_~~.- ROOF PARKING LION 5 UAR i , / _ O x x ~~1I ANTLERS _ \ I u1 Ir.l O ~j 1~ \ /~1. ; oaaw o9 ree ~q WESI DAY LCI - `1 ( s- op t\2 e, - ry o - 6\ - d..e wnwr ° SPRING/FALL EQUINOX 2:00 PM MARCH 2I /SEPTEMBER 28 P,I 4b 5UN/5HADE ANALYSIS - EXISTING BUILDINGS J I - mm_ I 1 1 Q LANDMARK Schultz \ of G t>o O LANDMARK a „ . Q u --CONGER W Nv SUNBIRD LODGE Z 1 l i , \ path Q POOL \ 11 ~ + 1 ~ + THE MRRIOTT DOS\\ I `\ON SpUPftE - O Q ~1 Y J OOF O ,L.• /d L PARKING rl O X v THE MAR IOTT ~l IONSHEAD' r Ci O Q _ p f PARKMG~ ROOF PARKING f I ` - LION SOUARE ? 1 JO \ 0., ANILERS / ..~Zt"4• I1 1\` I OO \ _ - , WC57 DA'` LOT\ 7 _ 5 l 1 p p -p ' ` - y:~ - - \ \ . \ oMw 09 FEB 99 O N INTER SOLSTICE 10:00 AM '°it NUnbi DEGEMBER 21 A1.4c SUN/SHADE ANALYSIS - EXISTING BUILDINGS - "r O ( e ~ \ Ratathmey Schulh LANDMARK A \ _ _ 1 ow LAN K i.. i 10 O O L?P i pZ SUNBIRD LODGE Z O \ ~ _ POOL L I ,!i!I l I; RE O O 1I,.: i I, ` -600 N THE MARRIOTT .p 0~\ Q tl ° \I I L\pN SpU `i ROOF \ V PARKING Y \ Q I ' l: O- O O 1 ' THE AR IOTi / M INSHEA ~ PARKING Or ROOc PARKING , \ _ I x. 1 ~ •O _ - Tyr LION SQUARE i _ ANTI { wo, i WEST DA LO1 W" 0 Y~ -f` as ° WIYNTER SOLSTIGE 2:00 PM DECEMBER 21 ~41.4d Q;; SUN/SHADE ANALYSIS - EXISTING BUILDINGS O :B Gwathmey -ry= _ Prato LANDMARK Scttulh J I -l1S~rr'" - _ LANDMARK I' I', I I"1 J I eoNC l~V~u._~eJb_/ _ - ~ _ \I ~ ~ I 1111 • /X/ t _~~.G, .I~• r ,'Ij - _ ri j / b pt (1/. _ / ~ gPP l~ Og SUNBIRD LODGE Z T III " / (O I, 1,-fT - , Q - - RCLE/ 'I r I I' z O / ..---L f'lf7-_ III(' !IIi ~ -,00 O (3 I•'~ rl O o Il I .kl l~I, II~!,f l11 ~pOa THE MARRIOTT ..Pay:\1 Sol) JON I n/ Q ROOF PARKING O r IOIT III 1 y~~~ THE MAR - IONSHEAD . I 'I 'I \ U LACE. ROOF PARKING r I _ C 1_- V' O a ' _ LION SOUARE r ANTLERS / L - 1, O l - - 1 D9tw o9 FEB 99 WEST DAk\ LOT\` ~ GORE CREEK CLUB Q - 1 a 1 1J ~ o`~~ U 77- - - - t~J~ SPRING/FALL EQUINOX 10:00 AM 3 u~ ( MARCH 21/SEPTEMBER 23 A1.4e ' SUN/SHADE ANALYSIS -PROPOSED BUILDING AND FACELIFT „tJ/ R - ' " i _ O.. Pratt LANDMARK Schulte LANDMARK w... as" i i °r - _ //-r- I ee>zy n' I I\ jFi p. O d O is) - I ~ ~ ~ N2\PT\ i i Z SUNBIRD LODGE Ile ~WEST~ LIONSHE AD CIR .•I•~ I POOL/ I O O 1 , I I / i l i l: l I _ / O 'tt''/ I: I 1 I I I I 1 / I E RIOTT ON SOV~ QQJ THE MAR ROOF o \ ~ _ PARKING \ Sl r THE MAR IDTT IONSHEAD, Roof PARKING O ~ Ir r~ i ) ' .1 - LEON SQUARE C.^ P~ r ' ' - II ANTLERS h _ Wf51 UAV LOI\\ GORE CREEK CLUB SPRING/FALL EQUINOX 2:00 PM K MARGH 21/5EPTEMBER 25 a C SUN/SHADE ANALYSIS - PROPOSED BUILDING AND FACELIFT f~l.4f LANDMARK Schulte - LANDMARK ' 11 : ~eoNCE lAll ILA' / p ~ ~ P AT r / SUNBIRD LODGE Z p/ '~~i( I I; ' l'U \•cLE~.~_ , L_POOL x- 1, THE MARRIOIT ' ~pQ\\'~ C\ON OU AR T QQ \ IC r ROOF PARKING J - ~ I•~,.r , l r ~ \ \ THE MAR IOTT \ \ i IONSNEAD.' ~ : ~ - il / \ ~ . , O._ LACE i ROOF PARKING ' LION SQUARE ANT i p \ t _ .t WES f DAY L01 GORE CRELK CLUB p - - - - ` wew a~ qqq 1 / o(A ..I. WINTER 5OL5TICE 10:00 AM DECEMBER 21 SUN/SHADE ANALY515 - PROPOSED BUILDING AND FACELIFT ® ~1 4g LANDMARK SchWfz LANDMARK SOS I I ' . ,r ~I 11 -CONS y/'_ 1 n-/ -AZ 10 )J/' I - r' I P OQ~b Pt JN SUNBIRD LODGE Z • i r 1 i o k O i 9 1 Z O~ •r ' l - o 4D i'• r 'r;:l III I i ,r - Al, l 1 a / PRE 0 THE MARRIOTT 0011 5 I N Q ROOF \ a, O~ Ly v PARKING (~/r ii\ ern ~ J IHE MART IOi7 ~il ,r r C,. .I \ ~ONSHE AD' O LACE O I, RU I LION SQUARE " ANTLERS 4ll WES 1 UAY\ I OT r GORE CREEK CLUB e - i0 - - _ ; cyrw oe Fee 4a Ill I - / - WINTER SOLSTICE 2:00 PM ,urnrz ~ DECEMBER 21 SUN/SHADE ANALY515 - PROPOSED BUILDING AND FACELIFT Gwalhmey Pratt Schu1K I • I i z W i I I ~ O 'r , to 1 - z -O Q I UNIT #4 II UNIT sM I a w I o : 1.. 0... I I . .L. O O I I i 1. O i II it ~ Q UNIT e II UNIT #2 > WX I I ' ~ ~!7.1',L, _'"ll..l 1L.S..l..l:..:_'LsI.ILJLWSLI~ I•I - :I I , El I LEVEL COMMON FLOOR AREA UNIT AREA 51X 950 5F UNIT 01 : 2366 GRFA UNIT 02 = 2545 GRFA UNIT 05 = 1136 GRFA PROPOSED "WINDOWS" REMODEL- PHASE II ~..t - UNIT 414 = M GR°A TOTAL 6925 GRFA g 2.~ Gwothmey PrOtf Schulh T 1 - b If r i i ~ ~ ~7 t . ~7 y frf~+ S1ti f t ~F rj 7,'y c ke t~ ! r "r, ~ ~dS" s; r rho IL a't. 6 ~f. -.~5 t i k N r f ~~r ~\+r Y T J ~ Y ~~t ti4~ Yv + Y 1 T~ pr~ { n~ 75~ rri~i,~E1t;Fy{t~ r~A~i l!'~` t~;~v f .r. ;~rr + t J.s _ Y~ ks) t, 1 W t 13 t _ z Brill H J v i PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION Q PHASE I PHASE I Q O xALE: N: I'-O' xALEi +k' I'-O- ~ z O p r ~ - ~J > W> i ~ ' n ]4t 1~.:. i I it iTrn m _ fSl I(r1 t' mm mr-i mm mm ~ 7II 111 4a ? 1 l~ : n - , n.. .n~ t ail EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION PHASE I PHASE I - fir. Nwrlbsr Gwafhmey Ralf SchWtz Y Y S ST L 0 m 1=r =r Pal t' ~l/~tF ,If 1 fJ f `1f r 1~._~~5y1 ~ 51~ t k Ii t31 IPf. X C' ~ lh i14' 7} 6 ><ti r iY~'YLr~ ~ fly ! f' Y~rts `G .l1}t 1. I" t ~ i ( t!I t rt r;~ f fil ' 1 n~ ' le•'' . 1' Y~x F1 . ~ 1y. Q is) W 13 LLI lu ? fn 0 ~ ~ J O LL O J Q PROP05ED EA5T ELEVATION PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PHASE I PHASE I Q O SO LC. k."- 1'-O' ° ALC, Ile' 1'-0' Z O ~ J N T S 5T w> i11 I , - r-'.- t - ^vgtsRf .'~i~rA, ~.f rel. pp,, Ir ? Y 171 ~T mrrl _MrTl . . i 1.IS2.~L 0 mm mm imm 11 •IIr I,, E l _L11L1_- ? i1 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION EXISTING WEST ELEVATION PHASE I PHA5E I S ALE, 14 • 1'-O' $ ALE. ~.2 Gwathmey Pran Sc~ulh M1 2'i~t -1n t (5~ 11r t 1 ~ 1 1 ! 'of I ~ l1 AI ~ ' mm mm m j)L7'~ z w ~~Ii 1 Y~ x,17' qty, jl' N Eli i SLJ E O IO IINIT9 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION , J Q SCALE, sy' . 1'-0' O Q PROPOSED WE5T ELEVATION- PHASE II Q J SCALE, Ns' ~ 1'-O' ~ Z V ~ J / W 1 i 7,) y I 1 114 1'1 1 IV 4~ ~ A' - f"• Pit. f 1 10 ED 9-1 v s .~la m m 117 171 [D EIIJW, 10 ED 0000 in l s f EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: Ne •1'-O' EXISTING WE5T ELEVATION- PHASE II SCALE ve . r-o' en..~ ramwr Gwafhmey Batt Schulte 4 ,~sbs ~ F: , Q F rr ~~~,°r~~ fit. ~aa1!st +ry!, ts) _ MITI 111111 upplipi v Ef' m m m m z JW1 I I I ~ I I Ii! I I I at i ~6 ~ I I 'lli~ ~I~ l~i {t z CSI m m : i~: , a: F l l.. 1tL] QI m rm r` O O L ~ O PROP05ED EAST ELEVATION- PHA5E II * O ~ O O SCALE: IW • 1'-O' Z U PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION j - S~ALE~ W' I'-O' W / Ity ~~rr d~l?t7~ d 79+"ftt l1ltk¶(}}II ~'Il',~ i~,'AF t1~6Y~ j C""^" ~ . ii r pp q ~ d i{~a 71 e? t9~,y' ~ .J N i" ~ I I III t, jle n ,.Ip .t 'tr i`y"~ f Y I,~1ati a~~' 7111~11 '11 OMw 33 1AN M m m E r g .II a'F Irl il, 4.-. 1 f ~ ~ A1:r n.•n..a GL7 S'~ r m fD F m m i~af&i Ilk.' . ti (D m ~;Y{ t~ Iki -a=A] ~Y . ' fY . `Y r'~:'Y m "m iit ,N..~ f M4, m m m ff Ha IF EXISTING EA5T ELEVATION- PHASE II SLALC. Ni I'-O' •vN.t NmIMr EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION ~y Gwaahmey I y } I I ,~I, I I I Y~' r Schulh A I 1b ~ I Ir~~X r~ tt' Ia~Eaa4,rt+lt'~wgbt~,r 4 {f~+ >Y t t ! +i~„ hj-.'.~"4" f T`~r ~ tkL ,F ,,t ~ G~ ~Cl'°i f+ Icy 1'111~1t,f tt IS~~ Cy~Cn,~ _r W - U0 ?I th z w 00 !D [11 00 0 EU Ft z 'o p [in n M~ M m 03 0° ° ? PRbPOSED EPSt ELEVATION- PHASE Ila PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION- PHASE Ilo p xA.ye~ W' I'-O', S[,ALC. Ne' 1 -O' T T T. I I , ~S p < O t.l N ixu ' 7 I I cif or f ~4' I Ott r ~a ' ty'' I~ r'r1~L11 j ~?,I ~jl lo;l i F j + ifs }C^"^' J l• dV a fl:j tl u t 1 , ~ ~ i w !!i, 1,, r, ~ia•~ I t~ lk r M.>. t~ j, $ ~ 1 .r '"N1 1T' I. { ~Fr' ' a ,y~' m Il ! r ° m 1 m m m I sm' m 1 m r> ' 1 I 7ui73 m m' m m s H;H :A EXISTING EAST ELEVATION- PHASE Ila EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION- PHASE Ila 9h..tw wr 9 ALC '1i . I'-O' SGALC: 'ter ,•-O' Gwathmey Y Y Y YY arc, s rr t i r.rr N Ih. y\ I} is dal a~+T~A r~l~pa{. ~ 5 ,9 ~7 fq ~h1 c Silt p O - LLJ i? l i 4$' I Z UJ o ? Q ? D7 E17 ~ I I OYQE~ [in FM m Ytmm v -1Q PROPOSED WE5T ELEVATION- PHASE Ila PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION- PHASE Ila O O SCALE. N,' • 1'-O' SCALE! H.' • I'-O• q p ~ Y s ~ S q ~ ~o 5' ~ p Yi Y Y gY ~ ~ ~ T qq' w > Ix Si_iiifJl; lfz"'11z ti •'AI!` 1111'. L, 1L s~+7f, I I:V L 'Y. ~ t'I.. L LL, I; ~li~'V~~'11~~r• q14 'N ' E{ iTYL tom" I i i i i Q, Lp! y r ? i M l ? t ? r I n om.. ~s N . 1ff ~II~I - j i1 3 i. ? p ? m OMD Mrt Q,I •1; `I~o ~(jlli..1 t~ t.o rti ? m In! 03 m:m ¦tl ~y d+ , I 1 11 m ? EXISTING WE5T ELEVATION- PHA5E Ila EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION- PHASE Ila SCALE. Ne' I'-O' SCALE. Ne• • I'-O' AyNest Nun.ber Gwathmey Pratt SchWh S Y Y Y S Y `'(191 f ~ ,m: 1 ~4'~4t 1'. It~ ~ r"mod 1!~ ~ r ~ p Q ~f r `y t I T L~2.i~.~ rl rrr 1 w w PROP05EP BUILDING SECTION PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION PHASE I AA z O PHASE I - BB - 5 AL=_: LW- r-o' J 56 LE. N>' - r-O' Y Y Y Y Yy' > w> - mm 1p~ - - EXISTING BUILDING SECTION PHASE I - AA ~q S ALE. Ne- l'-O' • Gwalhmey Pratt SchWh ~ i - . ~PA~, ff~'T it~~r_l~l. :lY~gy~j, t• ~t,~ l*F~8piC5 f`. Ej 0. Pi`s' ml:. ~ Q ;Ittk. r:1?'IoisPye'b<Ltli~':F::2`I'Z?,itJ'a'. I fl7~l 4 w = ~lif I. . STN M ..I J 1, , l...1:~ . I I LU FiTyfT `zL W CY.I 7~ Nf.T,t'I (7, 1 JTT~T T. Q z IL w U Oto J Q PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION O PHASE I - AA SCALE: 7U'. I'-O' = O Z O ~ J P f Y > w > 711; 1,11171 I fTY]..1 ICllll I .i .i f Wtw 25. 1199 .1I ....C:fSfaa.....1_flCi~ f ll.;I 5n..7 ra,ti,.. EXISTING BUILDING SECTION PHASE I - AA 4.2 S ALCM 14' '-O' 4 4 4. 4 4j Y 4 4 ° 4 47 q 7 p 7 4 4 f5' q Gwammay : , Pratt Schulh i i. ; i i LLI , I : i i I - i i ii i i ,i I ow W. IL PROPOSED BUI'LDINGISECTION PROPOSEDIBUILDING SECTION PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION z p PHASE II - CC PHASE II - BB PHASE II - AA SCALE: M~' I'-O' SCALE: Ni I'-O' St:,AL[: M' I'-O' _A VI _ 4 4 4 47 ? P 4 Y S 4" Y p S S 4 4 YP Y Y w> i i' , EXISTING BUILDING SECTION EXISTING BUILDING SECTION EXISTING BUILDING SECTION PHASE II - Cr- PHASE II - BE, PHASE II - AA A4.3 SGALE~ Me • I'-O' SCALE• Lb' I'-O' SLALC: Ne' I•-O- 4 44 r Y 4 S 4~ 4 4 4 i 4 4 °4 4 Y 4 4' YY 4 4 4 1 Y G..th., Proit I SchWh Z ,I w REVISED BUILDING SECTION v O PHASE IIA - BB w REVISED BUILDING SECTION 9 ALM IW • 1a PHASE 11A - AA q sc.Le, N.• . r-o• ~ O Q s ~ A z O _ F Y Y4 4 Y 4 Y Y 4 4 4 44 4 44 4 S Y 4 4Y 4 Y4 Q X Q 5 w> , El j 1 1 I I I I I I I I i II . I i I I I I I i I i I I I ~Nw! NHnbsr EXISTING BUILDING SECTION PHASE IIA - BB EXISTING BUILDING SECTION A4.4 5 ALES N: 1'-0' PHASE IIA - AA SGhLCi Ne' 1'-O' ~ TT T 4 ? S' tt T T T T T ~ ' ~ Schulh ~ I mroaw. I ~ UW I z° s s W RE\/15ED BUILDING 5EGTION Q PHA5E IIA - GG Q I O sine, w• . r_o. ~ J Q ~ O ~ = O z 0 T TT T S ~ Y~ T T 4 T4 w> ' ~ Datw OD fm 99 l; 11 l i I I l i ~ I I Dlwt NmWr EXISTING BUILDING 5EGTION PHA5E I IA - GG 4.5 s ALC. Ni • V-O' 11 I i I [xlsrIN551R1Gn53[ GwoMmey Fatf Scllulh r _ _ i I i r~ I I 3 1 5 6 p ~ II r I lL Ir-- 0 eL loo-D•. ~ ~.:I10 iI .L ems. tl i I rot9mAtlm[, L==j1 I 1 I 11 5 II II 10 9 / I~ , •'1 n I I II 11 _ 1 I $PAG[ D w ~_r O Q Lo~v.lll I I W Q I l 0 11i• I v 0 D y\e i Imli ryl n ~ 1 I 1!1 TI 111'1 ~ ••c •~'•C I '~I EXI5TIN(, I I MARRIOTT i d 9904 r .NN ,9 I wa.w, ~I I IEn Ex5nN5 [Gwta1 LEVCL eARKII( PARKING RN8 R[}ALL IT S BE SiWGPFE AREA GRfA (6Ro AREA I t5RG551 158055) (5ROn1 O^ !I I ICAO 94165, 6155E r] a I !1 I ON; 9116 X HOGS X ~,ODD 5F S U11R .10•A • 5350 bREA I I M9[C 11'122X N AO X s~ X 1,,15f a LM115. ~ . e.50'J GBPA ~ 1 FOUL 1355 X I51MI3.1050 • IGLOO 68EA rN[ 5. 5 X IO =.'Z • 10500 AREA S• `'SOFA PARKING LEVEL ZERO 51% 5315 5~ 10 LNI15. 1050 . IG500 SRFA SGALE~ Ne' I'-O' DN9rt Nimb.r 5^rLN 519 X 8 NIIr5.10•A . 9,150 6REA [ ' 5,245 X S1V0103. DW e A A 2 .O D1UD10. 19.1 . SDI • 164158EA i0fAL 1153 WA GwalhmeY Pratt ' I ~ t:wsnR6 z,RIG,LIiC SchWh x I ! ST0RA6E jx'~ 107 Ip I ,JI WIT5 O O C1Y'8 SLOPF0.11% CL IOr-0' m Emn* FARKI%LEVEL 101-6 g lb 11 i 1D w D0 d rl D] I XT 4 LW 108 109 AO tl1 tl2 Y3 tl9 115 6t bD I 69 I 10 T l2 13 19 1,15 I w ~ , i L i L i P ~ \ 1 , a ' i 5 z w I 123 I2] I1f 170 1M u8 Ol tlb 66 i 65 b 63 j 67 d I 60 591 56 51 561 55 I 59 153 j 5L7 / I Id- ~ ~ i I I I Q ELJf -r `AOPE0.,9f I W,T 3 I ' oR 'i(f 1 I 11111 i ~ 1 i ~ i IY-- I •p I I I I I,i I , O ~ Q I 11 Q, 171 135 126 171 12D IT 130 30i i 97 i 93 Dtl 35 156 91 Ij38 f1 i .O I VI I 93 i 1. i t5 .b i 91 ID .9 150 i I' 1 1 ~L,' 1!- Y qq ~ I it d wwp \ ~ 1~ 1 INL BULpR55TORME i V \A "v WC%,.0014 1 p i ~•I , Rtlll N J I1^ 1ic . b 11 I , "11•~I ~ ~ II • I 2 EXISTING I MARRIOTT I I ~ R~vl.tl I 1111 I 1dW C%I m Gp•Md LEVEL PARKIRS PA9K`% FLOOR n.t IT S11CL,IT STRLG1 AREA 6r VA ARCH 11 I R0Y.r1 /680551 1680551 f6 11 I zm Y116Y N3Y L I r~ 1111 I pS 1.416 51 27L635r !ODD SF 1 W15.10•A• 175l WA Ionv 2]A63Y 7d5D5r 609T5.1050. 69006UA A 3 I 111 I n c 19A105T 54626r 1,915( bW115.1050. 6;5W WA I 1 PQft 17335E 16 WIfS. 1050 • 163006RFA -L %m 10WI15f1o ,10500 WA PARKING LEVEL ONE rA _ S o (5.991. 1,92 wA UNIT LEVEL ONE SIa 525 5E IO W ~T5 .10W . 10300 WA 51w1 I.AMer SGALC: 'Ae' I'-p' SEVCx d I WIT5.1050. 9,45068 A A2.1 1 Lp-15. f9t . 2--A 57955! STL010523.4.559 • IA6 -WA WA ,OrAL 11995 6RFA GwaMmey I; RaM I i~-- Eu5ntK 51wK1WE SCI{UIIZ _II _ , Sim I 1 IS 1 205 101 205 20] 2p 1200 Pw IM 19T 6W 195 1H 143 '192 I 19 MO ID9 ND IDt IDD IDS 1M I I03 ! - r`. VE51. 1Xli I IN \ EL 121'_~ _ L I G L i IL I L i L I Li L L G I L G I L { 1I~ / 1 11 . l"I ` - - CL 120'a' EL et'_~ EASTil5 PAW%LEVEL IIl'.3' SLOPED. tl I - g 206 201 20D 209 ]b N a2 a3 Uh 1166 let 16D 169 i Il0 I IT 117 Ili 111 15 116 Ill II1D Il9 i Im %V/ - I cLO 1 c ; ; .Z I 11i .__.v..:h .I.,. i c o. q...N I 2a 220 a9 aD aT a6 as a1 IM 163 162 W b0 . 59 ISD Isl IS6 Iss 151 153 Is] 1151 IPA 119 1 W ~t-r i i I I ~ 1 1 Q 4 CL I ~ EL 121'+!' * SLOPED. t4% I1 1 I I t1~ Wrt9 i 1 ~ I I d~ 1 ; 1 L€. N!''g. ' I I Q J p 2]1 12]5 IL 113L: 133 131 113511 136 Lit 113D II IN I I/O 1111 ^ ILi 19` I` 111` I I` I Ill i 11- ` Q 1 I ]]3 WRD 1 S' dARNSE ENAUtCE/FAr N O 1' it j 1 ..A ~ ' ~'-fl Y'~ IEAnn"N IL r y Wli Tr LwTI W 2 > I n ~ i 2 ~I ~ ~ II' 1 I mI M I I EXISTING i I MARRIOTT I ~ D.G ]9 .lAN 99 I R.NwdI 111 I LEVEL PARKINS PARKING "LOO"N RETAIL WIT 5wxT RC Si TWE AREA 6RFA AREA I i (6RPY.J (690551 (6rtbY1 1 =O 1,1 I ZEW 11,916 Y 613 5F I I I NE 9916 Y 21883 Y 110DD SF 5 WI15. 1050 • 57506FFA !1 IV10 110225T 22D63 N 266D N 6 Wlts .1050 • 63006RFA j I li I -EE 1,A10 5F 5D6] X 1,42 X e ITS .1050 • 6300 6RFA = FOX 17335E 16 WI15.1050.163006"FA F1vE 5a'S5F toW1Fi.105o.103oo6PFA PARKING LEVEL TWO 5LLf15. 5,,. 11Z'00 .9M 6RFA UNIT LEVEL TWO 51X 5715 g 0-500 WA SCVCN 514 5F 9 WII5.10•A • 1--1A C16M 1 LOF15 • 591. 2.119 6"FA A 2.2 9795'F SILDIO . D69 • IWI6R1'A 5110105 231.531. 1162 -A tOIAL 12395 p A Gwattmey ' Batt Sctwlh I II CXIS11165,WGiLRE o - - I I;a I i I 1 'I I _ I ~EL 131.-b', C•=• :J. 1i'3 I G. .J :fi0 Ifl 1%6 IaL ]tb '1 ]65 ]bi 163 1611 ]U; ]60 ]59 , / O i. I r 1 ~ EIOSLRI6 PARKINS LEVEL 1]l'-D' / t• •st El: r 1 I S, 71156 I ]5 ]SDI _ i r I .1 I I i UO n :w I _Ot 10n xn :.0 _t ,1 r ~I E 11 - J Tl-F ]51I ]`I .1501 ].9 UDI 7~t! 1 ~ y~iiw.i•o ~ O I j l . ~s~:1S_ I I li- I I I ~ I I I I O; a L11T-B' uE 21-4 145 Tpppp '1 ~ ~Q I f n. Ilr-9 1 5LOjP06EA6~ I 1 1 tit Wns I r-1-- r __I` r O J Q I ' ' lJ 1j I I I ( i I 1 I 1 i °>T"a•,.°b`c f V ' \ K4NM16AL _ ,I 126 12t I I ]901191 ~2421]411:44 I ' I . I"•~. I RLS1r1 ~j - L L }SDI ]]9 I ]'A ]3 }3}I ]3511 ]N I }35 ]36 13, 13D I ]°A .1 I I 1 I ~ J I L. ~ 1 O 41 aC r1tl. ,iC I IL V 14 o J I _ ! I UNn l3 pp p 1.tln l2 i ^ ~ , n \ v !'NI O Y I r 1 n,l w~~r:.Tr' I 1','} r YI E X 15T I NG i, W w 39 1AN 99 I. i I MARRIOTT••~ I 1 I Kn Cw5i4G CI PARKIWi PARKIN'i fLOW RETAIL MIT LEVEL M WA AREA S(6pD .RC SIftI1 S5) 5, AREA (6ROSY (WO5 I I I f6R055) ' ZERO 1!916$1 M39 OK 11916Y 12p631.1 9pBBY 5W1511050• 57506RFA ~ I 1 ~ I 1 I Tn0 114111 222639 2W Y 6 WITS b 1050 • 6300 6RFA ry ' 1 MtLE I-0 •F 5D61 5F 1,11 5E I ITS. I0 • 6300 WA I I EOW 733Y 6 WTS• 1050.16bW WA 1 1. W W T5 • 1050 + 10500 WA FM 5715 N 5 LOFTS • 911 • 1.965 6RFA s1. - 571551, 10 Wi56IOS 105NW WA PARKING LEVEL THREE ~rw.r rwlw.F 5[vEx - s)mY 9Wns+loso 99wWFA UNIT LEVEL THREE 1 LLfi5. 391. 2,11`1 WA SCALE. 116' • I'-O' E16W 37.5'.F 5T 1 • 069 • 0696RTA SWO513•/ 551 • 1661 WA TOTAL 15.96 6RFA pratt ey Schultz MT. s-`Xz I II - A'Lr F...»e 11 I I F„ e - - - - - - - f- - i r.1 I r - ~.L I e I, rl'!I \ I p Y ~I !alr !~`fLlil D-1 I - IT, - .ifi 'CL.or Io1ru , A1. /1 f Ijl Wt 23 IILI• "Wra~ I I({.Wtn1 ii { I uulDS III I I11LrIr/ In LLI ' • • t':., I!! m , t I LCNGE I.:~I ii L ,/I II , Wr ZAI I ` Wr~6y - 600 ?r - I I '~J .h rL. .l' L- . ~ . it I II((I I GD' _ _ _ - _ -_•1. I_'" ~jl..l'.I.:~r I ~II _ _ .PSI - I I .T 12 r Wr 31 r11 i ` I I I I. 1~~ Rmr DARCCx aoaF bARCex r ld ~ .-I I.. ~ { I. 11 II.-I~I tl 1. I l I I7 O 2 I p .."ii II I~_lu ~ .I I L,~rll11 I I I{~' 4 tl wl,5o I~L.~ 7w.. IT .I`..il I iI ll,fll) Q I I ~ rirl 4 I I ~ W ~ I I WIT ZO <':I 1 f•ijl 1 I '~f 6ARA6C ENIIU CE9.1 j 'IY` li L (!%511x61 ~1 Lair w ' .LL _ wn le I r I.: a tl~II E O Q C I fi I i n 1 ~.I n i • c ~ ~ I I II; II O ~ 111'1 I y EXISTING i I MARRIOTT ~4 iANg9 I , I L n.v1..a Icn E.5,Ix5 EoM10x I I I LEKL P 4KYL5 PAR[MS FLOOR M,AK Wl i SRtl.G1LRE SIRC,ptE AMA 6MA AREA 168055) (bR055) (6ROYal I 1!I I ZERO EamY N35i I O ~l IXf 1916 v 22A635E .oDD N 51NI,5. 1050 • 52W b A 1 r~ I I pl0 -11-22 5r 22A63Y 2866 S b .15.1050.6300 bMA A I 1'11 I MIEE NATOY 5A60X 1,12Y bmm .1050. 6900 WA :t . I r0.R 1 959 16 Wi5 . 1050 •16A006MA f~lSX 10.15.1050.103 w0 fM 5 LOM I MI . 1,. WA $ 5o15y oWrs.loso.lo5oo6MA UNIT LEVEL FOUR0 °n10f 5CK14 514 X 4 W15. 1050 • 4,1506MA 5 ALE. W' 1'-O' A2.4 CWrt ,LCl15.991. ],,M DMA 37.5 SP S, xv I. eW MWM 5, 23,1.311 Tw DMA tOIAL 1134 61+FA Gwafhmey Pro" I . I [RlsnNS slwc,wc S hu Schultz Op !5! :41 (1.1 r, I L I N r 7]iI 1'711 i orF J . :.Ig _ :a'R• - u ~1 I 1. I : - 1 i, l 7; (L 5 pEw7 1 ~I ~ .1c'~ I . .il k i ~I,il,..._.•, ~I l a..I -4 -1,.,N .a n t •,I' ii v 1- 1.i I!. { L O _ .1T1 I LNN 31 6 r 39 _ r I.I IL! L 1I WT ~ 4.'i] _ - it l`a:> f W1r 5s Ij.r I r I i r N j W, ' li I II j N II; [IEpGISE W !.7 `-i_.....-! {r II_I I:I: f LMT 03 - _ ' URT 91 o-b' --O_- ~d I - I 1" [ i I.i z 1 I i -orEN" o r ~R~S ff d I I ¢,C I II ~ a~ . Wlr,t _Q•1 I Ill ~ ~f _ I ' WT 22 L T 1` ~_d I I II I ~ ~ ( U1 D N I ! i IT L,,717 2 u9 ~ I , I FL 1 N ENOU / it BILOW I I v V A U] ~i 1 I ~..r o`' ,a I ~ ~ ~ I N ! t n \ 1i 11;m1 i G'L.r.~~• I ,ih',I s=.rr I ~l EXISTING I MARRIOTT a pa4 09 1AN 99 ,ti I RMRW~ I P= [x51tN6 FA- OOP°H 1 I LEV[L I BOON RC,AIL IT STWGNIE SR[ ANEA 6WA ARCH I (680551 (bRo5 (Nt055) f6ROh1 O ,1 I tERO R916 5F 6135, I I ONE 8916 Y t]L635F ,,ODD Y 5 LWrS • 1050 • 5.2W WA w 812051, nba Y3 2L60Y 6Wn5 a 1050. 63006WA I I RCC M,110 x 5662 SF 1,92 Y 6 W115 R I= • 6300 WA ; 1 FOR 1733Y b wT5 a 1050-.bow 6WA FM , 5015 SE IOW1591050.105006WA S'T' '59,. 1,-05 WA UNIT LEVEL FIVE 61, 5]15 SF 10 WITS • IO5O • 10300 WA fl-ALE. k.' I'-O' SMet Hurter SEKN Sq Sr. , LW,5 a 1OW . 4AW WA EIWT ,LC9T5e99,• 1.1116 A A2.5 9115511O101RM9• D696WA 580105 2,9.1 R 554 . IL62 WA T.r lt3} wA Gwathmey Pratt .1 Ex5rI* 5rP1GRRE Schulte I II :1 '1 0 r - - 1 r ~ I i 1 I I}~ qi - I I - m L .mw r ( _ I~ tl I _ II i I I nl`II'al' I j , I ~ I I Ill,t~w E 1r'' I II II .t'' 1 ~I r} 1 ~ 1 i11/,_; II i. ~~I•I;;~' L :H ( ~i -._t II t'n , 1E n ..II I ~IL r[I O __:~.-V~..,r r lubr.s! I~.. II .I 1-1 uvrt Al I 46 : I Ic°u y wrt s3 WIT II_•f.I 1. I.1,/ 1 f t _ _ I j uar 9 uu14b k .II~Ii.1, Ds° sFROP" I 1 _ j t/ t` 11 i I, • ~'La~ • ° 8 m..6 G '-I I ' ] e ~I I'1`h II1f l l l,l l.l; z 1 I I. - ~ V LNi 49 1 •i WIT D] i~ I'li ilt I I~ ' 1~ l ))AA~• 11 ~ ! V J V I .I ili I Il O Q I 1 1 IAA {41 F iI IJi EM ro I I W1rv I~ III ``i 1111 m I Q I° I 6ARA6E EMW9IGE/F~6/ o (Cx15r1N5) ; \ U I V o I v~l I IP ~I ~ \ II 12 yl ~=t« I EXISTING I MARRIOTT 191AN ,9 I I I ^ RwNwd, I H[R E%SrIIK LOH1T1 I ICVEL PARKINS PARK66 FLOOR 0.EiAIL WIT 5r0.lGRRE SiR1G1lRE AREA 6RFA AREA I (61,119 16PAJ•1 ( -SW O I I ZERO 10',,$' 6/35r I III I ONE 1116 SF ]]A6351 /ADD X S WI15.1050 • 5750 6REA IY lYtl 11,1]]Y ]]A635r ]A.bV 6WI-1050. 6_O WA It M9EE 19,ANO X 515615C 1,9] 5r 6 W115 w 1050 • 6300 6REA ~ I I FOUL 1733 Sr 16 WI • 1050, 16A00 AREA FIVC 5a5 V 10 WI15 • 1050 • 10300 WA 5LRr5w 091• 1,905-A UNIT LEVEL SIX 51% - say X 10 WIiS • 1050 • 10$00 6RFA A1wf Nxlils~ SCALE, 4. SCVEN 510. 5r 9 W 115 w 1050 • 9950 eRFA 4 i/1 E- 1LOri5w 391• ],1196RFA / l`•~ 3795Y 5nv101 • 0E9 • 069 SA 5NDA5 ]3.9 w 559 • IA6] 6PfA r0rAC 1]395 AREA Gwathmey 1 Ruff I - E:aSnK. srRLenRE Scfwlh ;I I _ _ ~ % VIII, r.1.1.J1f, I{ + I I P I!II' 1\ r o L. - I 1 +~ficiU ~L'w. L I ,j ] rl LI I~ fl' q I I .I, 0 I ' II '11.9 Y Y I f- I: ' EzPLOY[E I ~ q/III MIT sl MIT 62 1 = - r 't~ t`*% I II r 1-= ! 1 uai 5a 1 i i . - oven r alt sr a 11 I 4 LoaasE (f J' 1 1 'j' W q MIT 11-_~ awSP 1 r,ii 8 II I,~ f!, I _ 11 ' , I I I III II .fl I it II yl uarlse -arc d •I 1 .144.4 I i z w 11 I II wrc9 rl MIT 60' l l r I:: - 111"1 r I 0 ~ O I I - - ' 1. ilk 1 lL I I _ r_ ~ , = s-0 . 11 Iilyl:rril~', L.. ~ o I I eAR,•eE ENIRAKE/EAt 1 ` ILUJ I _ (E.50461 + , ` O o l V v i UA J I ~ I c a > > I ~ ~I o i n T i 'n c b 1 m `I cj \ ' , I I EXI5TIN6 _ w I MARRIOTT I a al.z9.3Aa 99 , Rrn..eI j I¢n E%SLeG EOHKlN I PARKRLS PA9%8G ROQt RETAIL -IT I ICVCL 51R1GMC 51161:iaC AREA 69FA AR[A I (680551 (680551 (6R0w I I 1CR0 u nb v 643 sr a I 1. ore 11 alb X 22263 Sr 4.0669 s ants .1050 • 5750 wI, ti I 1I I w b 122 X 222b3 Y 2265 5, 6 aIr511050 . 6300 WA 11i I iHiCC 22!40 Sr 5,661 5, 192 5r 6 aIT5 • 1050 • 6300 WA ~ POW 1735 sr I6 wIM IM • III)- WA TIA • 57159r 10 x11511050 • IOy006RiA , - 5La15.3a1• 19656RA UNIT LEVEL SEVEN 51z ST55, 10-•1050 •10!00 WA !®\\1 SOALCN9" I'-O- SCVCN 519 5, 9 w115 1050 • 9,450 6R,A ^ E 161rc 1 LOr15 r gal • 2,119 6RPA ^ I 3745 ST SN0101 669 • w 6wF _ 5,M 13.4 r VA - 1662 WA TMf L 12995 6RlA , Gwathmey I ;I .E%511N5 sTwcrlP+z PraMY Schultz r I i !A! II 111 i, LWarirSD. ~ WR SI l LOrt I.(:-~ (:I tl t 'i'Iifl~l} Lq`-r g E1~/ I i~ p...~•.,• SRrnpI .'I-{1~...,..-~t i::~ III ~~31t1,~., I ` 1 f t I 'LPENTO I_ I~ lI I - To ' O OPEX TO ' (OPEN IO OPEN 1 BE1.Qh I(1 I I l I ! I rca ~ I I) II: ~1 7 ~ 1 7 eEtoir. I ~ eEla+ eelort • 1 it OPE I: TO _ - ew Sf j -_f 141 W C10 4 I I sv0 t"T 5D } I I OPEN id I I aELOAI I i iLl I 5ROp1 ~ 5R9I03 1:- ~ O 1 I I I ~ i ~ t 1.. ,ii f11• ~ W I II it Ij aPEEITd ' aQ oPE4 t0 1.E~_ll~_ Illi.l ~ ~ ' NIR 59 - _ ~ WITI!0 IIHiTtt"IL~' ;c•, V I I ' ' ' I bARAbE EHINAIYUEATi I ; ~ n/ O I I fE%ISiw51 t IVL U IS I ~ I Q ~ J I ~ NI o I I EXISTING I MARRIOTT 1 t I ~ a ..mod .NN N I j'1 I HEN E%ISTM C01410N LML PAXKWS PANI;P15 r~OOA NEIAR WIT S1C SINICILR£ 6iffA ARG I (66ROWN0551 (6N0551 l6NoY) O !1 I IENO Q91D 5E w r1 I !1 I OIC II,91D Sf l_'L63Y +.ODDX SWNS.10•A 5]506RfA I iM0 I,+Z3 Sr 2JA635E ]Dee Sf 6WR5.IOSOa 6D006NfA Itl I iMEE 11,++0 X 5D62 Sf 1,9] SF 6 WI15. Im • 6D00 WA 1 fOIF 1133 5f 16 WI15.1050 • wwo WR fM ' 5115 Y 10 WI15.1050 • IO500 6N'A 51DP15.39,• 1,9056XFA UNIT LEVEL EIGHT 51% 5715Y 10 WI,5.1050.10• ~61tfA SGALE~ Ns' I'-O' IArnb+r SEKH 5)91 N 9 WTS.1050 91506WA EI6Nf 1 LOf15. 8V ] M T A A 2 .8 3~+5 X 5110101 . eb9 • D69 A 51L01052,3.4.554a ID6]W6N('A -AL 1],395 WA Gwathmey ' Prato - [wines irttcnaE ~hWk . , ' - I I I - li 'I ;i - I lL i I - _ If144~ I ~ Ti. i ; ,i I.lo oQ ili _ r ' I (l I ' ~ li i li it - l(Il, ~ (Q I i lfl.~+ : 1 fEZAwvE Evnu,eE,Ewr , -A w 0 11 _I _ ~ Q, J EXISTING MARRIOTT rwl..a 0 a ROOF PLAN ,GALES Ne' 1'-O" P~2.~i Gwathmey Praee Schulh .~,af "'f Its>,._...: _ i•.r / t ~ ~i 1;~ ~~;i. tea .Pl m w`;, tar .Ill#~) O 4 I Ile I? 1 IiIH1,T~ll'rlltllllll; I hll~k,F~IIRIi{II41I"P~1y141<I b~v.4 'h i _ _ _ _ LU IP-;jj; Td j :IIPII OR Fllk~li l~ lS fllpl; 9 IAE (j~~ i I+EItI I~ ® ® 1~ Z i g } I f q[UI! { I I I,jwl;kl+ ® ~ 9~L NEd~'I. } ? ,el 1 dP}4~ ..rj U I • k'•r{"'A, ~(a , xl~°• v y-, ! e~; q};'ia ki 4,, ?r;: iftap. ~.•.-:x ~ f x ',..f r r- ~h r~ - tlC, i. ~?.i•• ~ lIl - ~ U Q EAST ELEVATION 1L IN O U ~ W J .e V 4 ar Irk 4~r ~ ' •E41 J~;{~ ,i,~La~.. ~ r~h d ~f Fi t h ~ n „ f ; , '~t-.~•^ 1'.:i ~ ® 4hC f1 •~~/R ~,4r k 1 .v f,f I N l,i, l yir~d ~ Yi v :M~_ l~'' n 4 ~ _ 5 r ' 1+.:<lr r eYfq S Ary?` 3`Plx ` S1 i ~;1 r.iP a 4"9~~ JIr~ _ s. ~l +~P/ ~~.0 rf <~~l i` $ „a ~ t -.v-. ri. J - a r•~, rr! . ' tis ar ~ Y S x ; F k rK;~.S f~, •4J, ~t ~ • ' ,r L`t N~'1t% x^ ~ ~ • art >.~^r Yy ot~r t~ - WE5T ELEVATION 'h°" ScMAK e n' ~~I,,y~t~tt) iti:i'i,'~),?'? jJA:~,~,~r~,ip!_,;.A.• cp +4 O ILI i 41, z mom U U U 1111 1.17M (L U O ~o NORTH ELEVATION v Q Q p Ww J X o -A W J l ~ r4 Jr_l X't Hy4 n e~ 7(,' ~ p:?• ~ 4`~+'Y ~i ~ e ° , ~ -w~- t4J plll am I~1 ®W a ~.a SOUTH ELEVATION sneee w.,e.. A3.2 Gwattmay Vratt Sc~Wh X11'•. . jj ,4 ~ r~ t'1FH~ ~4Er+.h I lSf ~\7Y ~l ,r '~1... ll ~~rr~~JJ ~id~5 1~_ b W p77~~y ~ WPr i14E"PI ~ k'. n w .F . n ~ T- F T 3 ~.en9n~w•. - r. -----J ~.n,.roe9 EAST ELEVATION/ SECTION Q O Q w ~ U O UI ,j per„}. _ ~~e~+51 •wn uvn la i 9iS \ Y r ~n 1n f l 1~f Y~` . T~ X71 i'~V IYf r.tr.7, ~S ~r }~~5 ~~pr 1,~. ~~'y,tf.'S? -ti'•; ~aY 1~a ~fr,,!.~PJ"'k,",k Oates 29 .NN 99 vu. ~eve~ EAST-WEST SECTION a,..e Nunber A 4.1 fl,Et/f+Tgi 3 NSLJ. sMPlor~ - L090'~ YAW N q s(K~5' - in .'M'lle 4.F. O ~ O OD O~ ' _DF-1b'~FAF~M o -52a 0 C= 1 e• a~ B~Raorq a f~8 5 F ~ 970 5,F f 6,F Q D o O NEW D ot7o" pp 4ToRa~E ° 7- 4~ -F M~~i~aL I Gwathmey Pratt Ghat EN FL o - Architects. p.c. 1000 S. Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Tel: (970) 476-1147 Fax: (970) 476-1612 Pratt Schultz P}''y~/+~`QED LGraINCT OCK MO[~? F?c„a oN S TO (97O)j76-IT47 Po, (970) 416-1612 ~iNC~ L~oc.K 'N N~ N U cpMfp,cpg 0 LU DCITMtAY - I ~~5~ BLjILx>I 4 NEW ENCL. V E5 ry° 104 /rye` NEW WALL-S, W/ ~i° L~ V~FtEE~2 '~~D~'WPt-K. r\- I- NEV~! ~D UwPa.-k `1 A M A 14 East West Partners George Ruther February 8, 1999 Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. West Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. Ruther: Asa general benefit.to-thr- community,- atmeshare proparty-fulf'Als.seyeral basic needs of both the permanent and the transient resident. This is evidenced by rapid pace at which this industry is graving worldwide--According to,--The Y~cation--Ownership Industry, a study by ARDA, interval ownership is the fastest growing segment of the travel and leisuw market, The-followin&discussiaa repres Agfjust a few -of the valuable reasons why properties such as the Gore Creek Club have been so well received by the corrmp pities-in-which-they..ambuiltand hy."se sing the properties. By creating the right size of interval ownership for a particular property, interval ors•=shippropertiesare-able-taattXac and-better.retam-the-valuable_,guests on which our resort depends. Interval Size IntervaownersWp,-tinwskare,-fractional-o rship--and residers claps are all part of the same family of real estate. They are all variations of the idea of sub-dividing a piece of re.lestate-in-.o=der-ta.law-errthe_costaedhassles.of gettin&i"ed in the resort real estate market. Choosing the correct amount of ownership is based on the cost, location, and tha el mographics-of.Wetarget_markei-7 fftr 2 particular property. The following chart outlines some sizes of interval ownership interests around ski country- aud..how-much time they allow each-Awner to use per year. Property Interval Size Time Per Year Hyatt Mow t hrLvdgr- ~ 1120 ApMx. 17 Days. Beaver Creek, Colorado Park Plaza 1/I 5 Weeks Beaver Creek, Colorado Poste Montane Lodge 1/50 1 Week Beaver Creek, Colorado Franz Klammer Lodge 1/10 S Weeks 100 EAST THOMAS PLACE P.O. DRAWER 2770 AVON, COLORADO 81620 rm-NE V70:3 Y.."M su-ac97a 845.7105 Telluride; Colorado The Deer Valley Club 1/6.5 8 Weeks Deer Valrey, UT Marriot's Mtn. Resort 1/50 1 Week Breckenridge, Colorado Many variations have been created in interval ownership; however, the Gore Creek Club would-be-best- suited fora share approximately1/20~' in size. When the property is not divided far enough, like the Park Plaza, The Franz Klammer, and-Thc-Deer-Valloy Club, die-casts-out-weigh-the bea;eBts of mterva`ownership in many ways. First, the cost to buy into the property becomes too close to the'cost of buying an older smaller-full ownership-prope"mearby. The east-te-purehewa n these larger share properties can run well above 5250,000. Secondly, the cost of upkeep becomes more than most-owners-are willing-to-pay. Most interval ownership-properties offer their owners more amenities than a typical condo. When dividing the cost of these amenities among fewer owners, each owner's expense becomes greater. FinaHy, the financial cost aLtime hecomec_too much- for most_ow=s._ IntervaLowners_enjoy. the freedom to travel extensively through their exchange networks. However, most of them are unable to vacation as-many .as-S.or-b.weeks.per_year._Their.family_and}ob-oWijzations only allow 2 or 3. In the-past mo years--the-Hyatt Mountain-Lodge _in. Beaver. Creek, has shown the great value of a medium sized fraction. At 1/20"', the owner receives one week of prime ski time-and-an-additional-10-days-of summer usage every year. This-mix fits very well with the demographics of the Vail Valley client, These owners tend to come from out of state for one or two visits per year. Witlrboth satnmer and winter usage;-at the Hyatt, these owners have a strong sense of loyalty and ownership in their property. However, if they are not able to use alrof their time here, they are able to use it through their exchange networksomewhere-else, They are. not- forced to huy. and. maintain property they do not use. Demographics One-of the-ftrst-concems many communities have when an interval. Qwnership property is proposed is, whom will this property attract. The demographics of the typical consumer of interval ownership .property..in-the- Vail Valley are no different..than that of our high- end hotels and lodges. The Hyatt Mountain Lodge in Beaver Creek sold 750 1/20`}' shares to-approximately 400 clients in just over two years. The following statistics about these interval owners were compiled from a survey of these owners in March of 1998. 1. What-they ovm -20L'/&- own. studios 45%ev-, 2 bedroom condos, and 35% own 3 bedroom condos. 2. Hour-much-they eearw-- 96`10/-earn more than U00,000-per, year, and 73%o earn more than $150,000 per year. R I 3. Hoiuold_they are - 47%. are.between-36 and 45, aPA43% are between 46 and 56. 4_ Hain-much. they.vacation - 3W/e-between 7 and 14-days, 33% between 15 and i 21 days, and 21 % between 22 and 28 days. 5. VAio-they vacations with- 61% -vacation-with family-&,Kids, 18% vacation as couples, and 16% vacation with friends. 6. Wharthey-da-on vacation - Mo vacation to ski, 459` vacation to golf, and 18% vacation to play tennis. 7. Where they are from - They represent almost all 50 states plus several foreign countries including Nfexica;:Great. Britain, Puerto-F.i , Venezuela, S. Africa, Germany, Canada, Austria, Aruba, and Panama: The-owners-at=the Hyatt Mountain-Lodge-in Beaver Creep are-the-s\ame clients that have vacationed in Beaver Creek and stayed at the Hyatt Regency for years. They, too, could have become homeowners in ,Beaver. Creek long ago. However, -they preferred the better location and the many amenities of the Hyatt Regency and other upscale hotels in the valley, M4= the opportunity to own a property with similar amenities and location at only the fraction of the cost of other condos, they knew what they preferred. The ease of etur-and quality-of the property made them owners and return guests for many years to come. T-he Gore-Creek-Club-in Vail.wdLoffer diis- same opportunity. The clients that have enjoyed the Vail Valley for many years, but choose not to purchase a home, will find the qualit34 location and ease of entry very attractive. They will become interval owners in the Lionshead area and will return year after year to their property. Live Beds The biggest goaLof.a.destination resort property is to properly yield manage their inventory. Yield management is the process of fluctuating rates in order to maximize the totaLoccupancy of.aproperty while simultaneously maximizing total gross revenue. However, in a destination resort such as Vail, Colorado, it is often difficult to use such a process- Thus,-the-number-of occupied properties (Live Beds) is not optimized. In areas such as Vail, the majority of the properties are owned by individuals and, if rented, managed-by_an-on- site property management firm, There are two inherent problems facing the number of live beds in the Vail Valley. First, only a few of the owners-shoose-to.rent their properties. As an example, let's assume approximately 35% of the second home owners choose-torent their properti.es.and.the other.65%-enly-u"eir properties for 21 days per year. Even at an occupancy rate of 70% for the rental properties the total-occupancy for.the valley drops to less than 30%. Secondly, it is difficult for the property manager to manage the yield of the properties madeavailable.- Withmmlymm.owner-perwift, the. unit- is-either-aeoupied or empty in the eyes. of the owner.. The, property . manager. can not offer one room at a discount and another at a premium and have an offset positive yield. If the property manager operated in--this-fashion;-he would be stealing from one owner to pay himself and another owner. It is precisely this problem that keeps the Vail Valley from filling our rooms more often tharrnot: Interval ownership is a good solution to this problem. There are several reasons why this type of ownership offers a better quality, more highly occupied property. 1. Return guests With the dividing of the ownership interest comes the dividing of the ownership cost. By bringing down the largest obstacle to becoming an owner (money), the Vail Valley can guarantee that guests will become owners and return year after year. 2.. Higher-Quality - In an industry with over a-901/o satisfaction rating, quality of product is one of the primary reasons these owners are pleased. By dividing the cost-of-maintaining a property among multiple owners, there is more money to be spent on repairs and maintenance. This allows interiors and exteriurs-tube often, avoiding-theprQverbial orange shag carpet we often see in older properties. 3. Live Serfs - Interval-owners don't come back every year. However, when they do not occupy their condo, they almost always send someone else. Interval International is the association that allows owners of one interval ownership. property to trade it with another. The number of members in the organization is now in excess of 400,000 families. If one of the owners of the Core-Creek-Club chooses not-to use his property, one-of these 400,000 clients will soon become one of the Vail Valley's newest guests. For.these.reasons,- interval ownership has been a great solution for many resorts hoping to maximize the number of guests in town year round. The Poste Montane Lodge in Beaver Creek-is a great-example -of a property that helpsbrizrggueststa"town year round, as shown by their five year total occupancy chart. Month 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 January - 76%_ 89% 9o%- 88% 93% February 69% 91% 95% 93% 94% March 83% 87% n% 96% 92% April 38% 67% 77%, 78% 77% May- 460k 460/cp 49%, 61% 39% June 85% 71% 70%- 69% 74% July- 70°lo- 76%" 64%, 83% 74% August 80% 67% 80%" 75% 77% September - - - 79%- 680/0- 72°!°, 76% 78% October 42% 54% 58% 61% 64% November- 50%- 70% 69% 50% December 75% 83% 72% ` 91% 84% 'this-chart-shows that the average occupancy of the Poste Montane`Lodge is well above the expected occupancy of any hotel, and far exceeds the very best condominium rental 11141148CITIent paol ocoupancyrates. Creatinga larger year round-cli"tele will ultimately help every business-owner and employee in the Vail Valley. It is of paramount impoitance that we continue the legacy of the Vail Valley as North America's number one ski destination. By insuring that the quality-guests, on whom our valley relies, continue to visit year after year, we will be able to uphold this tradition. Intecv d Owuership-is-a-govd first-step irr-guaranteeingthat ttre"wners will return to use their property and spend money in our valley for many years to come. Sine ~1 East West Partners Interval Ownership Presentation East West Partners Table of Contents Section 1 Interval Ownership History Page 2-4 Section 2 Interval Ownership Benefits - Consumer Page 5-6 Section 3 Interval Ownership Benefits- Community Page 7-12 Section 4 Interval Ownership & The Vail Valley Page 13-14 Section 5 Look Who's Talking About Interval Pages 15-23 Ownership East Nest Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation What is Interval Ownership? Interval ownership offers the opportunity to purchase fully furnished vacation property sold in a variety of forms, such as weekly intervals or point based usage systems. For a one-time purchase price and the payment of an annual maintenance fee,,purchasers own their portion of the vacation property in perpetuity. Owners share both the use and costs of upkeep of their unit and common facilities. There are many formats of ownership, varying both in size of the interest purchased and how it can be used. Based on the location and the demographics of the target market, intervals range in size from 1150th (giving the owner one-week per year), up to %2 (giving the owner 26 weeks per year). In addition the owners have multiple ways in which to use the time they own. Systems vary from a specific week in a specific unit (fixed week fixed time), to a floating system where the owner may select any week in a certain season (floating time). Re-Introduction the Interval Ownership (Timeshare) Industry If you formulated your opinion about the interval ownership industry more than a few years ago, it is time to re-examine just what is happening in this business. The interval ownership industry has gone through a long maturing process. It can be characterized by three distinct phases. The industry started in the French Alps in the late sixties. It wasn't long before unscrupulous individuals in the United States found a way to exploit this good idea to their advantage. For the greater part of the seventies, timeshares were conversions of old condominium properties that were difficult to sell because of financing or lack of quality. Unscrupulous developers typically sold them with no follow-up management after the sale. This image was well ingrained in many Americans for a long time to come. 2 East Vkkst Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation The second phase of timeshare came in the early eighties. During this time period many reputable developers recognized the benefits the sub-dividing of resort real estate can offer. During this time period many developers began to purpose build timeshare properties. These were often in prime locations with prime amenities. However, the old timeshare image was still hard to dispel. It wasn't until the third phase of evolution in the industry that it finally shed its old image. The entrance of many name brand operators characterizes this phase. Marriott was the first nationally branded hotel company to change many people's opinion. They led the way in the mid-eighties and have been joined now by almost every major hotel brand including Four Seasons, Hyatt, Hilton, Ramada, and many more. With every major hotel brand now involved in this industry, most Americans are beginning to understand its benefits. They see that a reputable company is selling a quality product and staying in the business to take care of the consumer, after the sale. Interval ownership has truly matured and shed the problems associated with it in its early years. From its beginnings in the French Alps in the late sixties, interval ownership has become the fastest growing segment of the U.S. travel and tourism industry. It has enjoyed a growth rate of more than 16% per year since 1993. There are now more than 4,000 resorts located in 81 countries, with more than 3 million families in 174 countries worldwide enjoying the benefits of this ownership opportunity. Large Companies Involved in Interval Ownership Name of Company # of Project # of Total Units Disney Vacation Club 4 1,339 Fairfield Communities 20 3,680 Hilton Grand Vacations 5 566 Hyatt Vacation Club 5 205 3 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation Marriott Vacation Club 35 3,000 Ramada Vacation Suites 15 868 Shell Vacations LLC 10 1,154 Sunterra Resorts 70 5,038 Visatana Development Ltd. 10 1,725 4 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation Interval Ownership Benefits - Consumer Interval ownership offers the owner many benefits ranging from pride of ownership in a particular resort to the benefit of owning deeded real estate. The following list is not exhaustive, but does outline many of the tangible benefits why more than 40% of interval owners purchase additional shares. 1. Higher Quality Accommodations - Of more than 2,000 US interval owners surveyed in 1995, 83.1 % responded that "certainty of quality accommodations" was a "very important" factor in their decision to purchase. By dividing the initial cost of development over the number of shares sold in a property, the total cost to each individual is greatly reduced. This allows the developer to increase the total expense for the development project, allowing him to have better locations, better amenities and higher quality interiors and exteriors. 2. Higher Level of Maintenance - Along the same lines as item number one, a higher level of maintenance means a better assurance of quality of accommodations. In today's inflated resort real estate market, renting accommodations has become a risky proposition. The rates are high, but no one knows just what they will get. Many second homeowners buy into their resort home and spend tens of thousands of dollars to redecorate and upgrade the property. However, after just a few years in the rental pool, the quality begins to wane. The owner has only used the property five or six times, but already it is time to replace the sofa and all of the linens. They are often reluctant to make these financial outlays. However, with interval ownership, the cost of maintenance is spread over the entire group. This allows more money per unit to be collected without burdening any one owner; creating a better quality resort many years down the road. 3. Better Locations & Amenities - In today's market place, it is the overall resort experience that is selling real estate. Not just the physical property or the salesmanship. It is the relationship of the property to onsite and nearby amenities. Some examples include: the Disney Vacation Clubs located on Disney property in Orlando, the Marriott Palm Desert Resort with multiple golf courses, tennis facility 5 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation and full service spa, and the new RiverPointe Napa Valley property in the heart of wine country. The Vail Valley is no different. Our consumers want proximity to the slopes and a full array of on-site facilities. With the cost of land at a premium in the valley, it is only logical that these sites should be available to multiple families. 4. Exchange Network - Along side "certainty of quality accommodation," "flexibility offered through the vacation exchange opportunity" was the second most cited reason for owning this type of property. As the size of the world shrinks, thanks to faster and less expensive travel, people are choosing to travel to a variety of locations more often. Interval International (II), an international exchange company, offers 1500 properties worldwide. Using a system of equitable exchange, an owner from the Vail Valley may choose to use a different property at the beach or even Europe. There is no feeling of being locked into one resort, like many people feel when buying a second home. II offers these owners exchanges as their gateway to the world. These four general benefits are not exhaustive, but do offer the four main reasons consumers are beginning to prefer interval ownership. In fact, two statistics reported by ARDA (the American Resort Development Association), characterize the overall satisfaction most owners are experiencing. • 41.2% of those who have owned eight years or longer have purchased additional intervals within that time. • 85.2% of owners are satisfied with their purchase, and 76% report having their quality of life being positively impacted by their purchase. 6 East Nest Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation Interval Ownership Benefits - The Community The biggest goal of a destination resort property is to properly yield manage their inventory. Yield management is the process of fluctuating rates in order to maximize the total occupancy of a property while simultaneously maximizing total gross revenue. However, in a destination resort such as Vail, Colorado, it is often difficult to use such a process. Thus, the number of occupied properties (Live Beds) is not optimized. In areas such as Vail, the majority of the properties are owned by individuals and, if rented, managed by an on site property management firm. There are three inherent problems facing the number of live beds in the Vail Valley. First, only a few of the owners choose to rent their properties. As an example, let's assume approximately 35% of the second home owners choose to rent their properties and the other 65% only use their properties for 21 days per year. Even at an occupancy rate of 70% for the rental properties the total occupancy for the valley drops to less than 30%. Secondly, it is difficult for the property manager to manage the yield of the properties made available. With only one owner per unit, the unit is either occupied or empty in the eyes of the owner. The property manager can not offer one room at a discount and another at a premium and have an offset positive yield. If the property manager operated in this fashion, he would be stealing from one owner to pay himself and another owner. It is precisely this problem that keeps the Vail Valley from filling our rooms more often than not. Thirdly, most of our condominium properties are not set up for transient occupancy. In order to truly attract destination resort travelers today, it is important to offer a high level of service. Many of our condominium properties do not offer front desk, concierge and bell services on site. They are operated from a remote location adding to the confusion of many guests. However, most interval ownership properties are set up to operate like 7 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation hotels, offering the most current amenities and services. This helps to attract and retain a higher level guest. Interval ownership is a good solution to these problems. There are several reasons why this type of ownership offers a better quality, more highly occupied property. 1. Return guests - With the dividing of the ownership interest comes the dividing of the ownership cost. By bringing down the largest obstacle to becoming an owner (money), the Vail Valley can guarantee that guests will become owners and return year after year. 2. Higher Quality - In an industry with over an 85.2% satisfaction rating, quality of product is one of the primary reasons these owners are pleased. By dividing the cost of maintaining a property among multiple owners, there is more money to be spent on repairs and maintenance. This allows interiors and exteriors to be upgraded more often, avoiding the proverbial orange shag carpet we often see in older properties. 3. Live Beds - Interval owners don't come back every year. However, when they do not occupy their condo, they almost always send someone else. Interval International is the association that allows owners of one interval ownership property to trade it with another. The number of members in the organization is now in excess of 400,000 families. If one of the owners of the Gore Creek Club chooses not to use his property, one of these 400,000 customers will soon become one of the Vail Valley's newest guests. Interval International uses a system of like exchange. This means that the owner trading into the Vail Valley will be relinquishing a property of similar quality from a different destination. The demographics of the guests trading in will be very similar to the demographics of our owners. These guests are new to the valley and would not have vacationed here if they could not have exchanged their property for the Gore Creek Club. This customer base is an excellent marketing opportunity for the community. 8 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation For these reasons, interval ownership has been a great solution for many resorts hoping to maximize the number of guests in town year round. The Poste Montane Lodge in Beaver Creek is a great example of a property that helps bring guests to town year round, as shown by their five year total occupancy chart. Month 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 January 76% 89% 90% 88% 93% February 69% 91% 95% 93% 94% March 83% 87% 91% 96% 92% April 38% 67% 77% 78% 77% May 46% 46% 49% 61% 45% June 65% 71% 70% 69% 74% July 70% 76% 81% 83% 74% August 80% 67% 80% 75% 77% September 79% 68% 72% 76% 78% October 42% 54% 58% 61% 64% November 50% 70% 64% 69% 50% December 75% 83% 72% 91% 84% Yearly Average 65% 73% 75% 76% 75% This chart shows that the average occupancy of the Poste Montane Lodge is well above the expected occupancy of any hotel, and far exceeds the very best condominium rental management pool occupancy rates. Creating a larger year round clientele will ultimately help every business owner and employee in the Vail Valley. ARDA statistics help support the argument that interval ownership properties bring more guests that vacation more frequently. • The average year round occupancy of interval ownership resorts was over 80% • Interval owners will return to their home resorts an average of 5.5 times during the next 10 years, as compared with an average of just 2.7 times if they 9 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation had not purchased the ownership. (Industry research suggests that Mountain properties have an even higher level of owner usage) • When not using the property for themselves, interval owners send a friend, rent the property or trade the property. They only left it unused 9% of the time. Demographics One of the first concerns many communities have when an interval ownership property is proposed is, whom will this property attract. The demographics of the typical consumer of interval ownership property in the Vail Valley are no different than that of our high- end hotels and lodges. The Hyatt Mountain Lodge in Beaver Creek sold 750 1/20th shares to approximately 400 clients in just over two years. The following statistics about these interval owners were compiled from a survey of these owners in March of 1998. 1. What they own - 20% own studios, 45% own 2 bedroom condos, and 35% own 3 bedroom condos. 2. How much they earn - 96% earn more than $100,000 per year, and 73% earn. more than $150,000 per year. 3. How old they are - 47% are between 36 and 45, and 43% are between 46 and 56. 4. How much they vacation - 30% between 7 and 14 days, 33% between 15 and 21 days, and 21% between 22 and 28 days. 5. Who they vacations with - 61% vacation with family & Kids, 18% vacation as couples, and 16% vacation with friends. 6. What they do on vacation - 88% vacation to ski, 45% vacation to golf, and 18% vacation to play tennis. 7. Where they are from - They represent almost all 50 states plus several foreign countries, including Mexico, Great Britain, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, S. Africa, Germany, Canada, Austria, Aruba, and Panama. 10 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation The owners at the Hyatt Mountain Lodge in Beaver Creek are the same clients that have vacationed in Beaver Creek and stayed at the Hyatt Regency for years. They, too, could have become homeowners in Beaver Creek long ago. However, they preferred the better location and the many amenities of the Hyatt Regency and other upscale hotels in the valley. When the opportunity to own a property with similar amenities and location at only the fraction of the cost of other condos, they knew what they preferred. The ease of entry and quality of the property made them owners and return guests for many years to come. The Gore Creek Club in Vail will offer this same opportunity. The clients that have enjoyed the Vail Valley for many years, but choose not to purchase a home, will find the quality, location and ease of entry very attractive. They will become interval owners in the Lionshead area and will return year after year to their property. Resale Value - Vail Valley In general terms, interval ownership is not sold as an investment to the consumer. However, the Vail Valley enjoys a unique position in the Interval ownership industry. Due to a very limited supply and a higher quality over many areas, the historical values of the newer projects in the Vail/Beaver Creek area have increased with the value of general real estate. This fact has helped to open up this type of ownership to many individuals that would not have considered it just a few years ago. Four projects in the Vail Valley currently have some sort of historical data supporting the relative increase in interval real estate values. ? St. James, Beaver Creek - A resale analysis by Slifer Smith & Frampton/VARE from 1/1/94 to 11/30/97 shows an average annual return of 17.26%.* 11 East Vast Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation ? The Poste Montane, Beaver Creek - A resale analysis by East West Resorts Real Estate from 1/1/93 to 2/3/97 shows an average annual return of 13.71 ? The Marriott Streamside, Vail - The current price for a two bedroom floating winter season share is 29,900, this same property sold in 1989 for $17,900. This represents an average annual return of approximately 5%. ? The Hyatt Mountain Lodge, Beaver Creek - Although this property just opened and the resale program has not fully developed, there are approximately 30 shares on the resale market. These shares are listed at approximately 40% over their purchase price from less than one year ago. Real estate values are an important factor for many consumers of interval ownership and second homes. By bringing a high quality interval ownership property to the Lionshead area, we will see an overall increase in the value of real estate and the rate at which the values grow. 12 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation *Value of vacation time utilized by the owner is not factored into the return. If the cost of alternative accommodations are factored into the returns, the total return would be even greater. Interval Ownership & The Vail Valley Why not just another condominium project? The Vail Valley has been slipping in the North American Ski Industry ratings. One of the problem areas is the value and quality of accommodations. For all of the reasons previously stated, the quality of an interval ownership property tends to be higher, and the occupancy also offers the community a larger base of business. However, financially interval ownership also provides a better value to the consumer. The total cost of vacationing for a one-week stay in the Vail Valley is on the rise. With room tax and inflation, the average Vail guest can expect to spend over $50,000 dollars just on accommodations over the next 10 years. Room Rate $ 350 $ 450 $ 550 $ 650 Year 1 $ 2,671 $ 3,434 $ 4,197 $ 4,960 Year 2 $ 2,884 $ 3,708 $ 4,532 $ 5,356 Year 3 $ 3,115 $ 4,005 $ 4,895 $ 5,785 Year 4 $ 3,364 $ 4,325 $ 5,286 $ 6,248 Year 5 $ 3,633 $ 4,671 $ 5,709 $ 6,747 Year 6 $ 3,924 $ 5,045 $ 6,166 $ 7,287 Year 7 $ 4,238 $ 5,449 $ 6,659 $ 7,870 Year 8 $ 4,577 $ 5,884 $ 7,192 $ 8,500 Year 9 $ 4,943 $ 6,355 $ 7,767 $ 9,180 Year 10 $ 5,338 $ 6,864 $ 8,389 $ 9,914 10 Year Total" $ 39,036 $ 50,190 $ 61,343 $ 72,496 '10 year total is the total dollar amount a guest can expect to pay for one 7 night stay per year 13 East West Partners - interval Ownership Presentation Over a 10-year period assuming a 9% tax rate and 8% lodging inflation rate. Value is a concern to our guests and purchasing a higher quality accommodation for less money than they would expect to pay in rent will help satisfy them. Seasonal Business The Vail Valley has come a long way in 30 years toward making this a four-season resort. However, there still exists a distinct spring and fall season. Because of the returning frequency of the owner and the international exchange network, an interval ownership property will offer a higher rate of occupancy, year round, than either a hotel or a condominium property. Location The average second home is within two hours driving distance of the owner's primary residence. The Vail Valley caters to a larger demographic than just the Front Range of Colorado. By opening up an opportunity to own just the portion of real estate that our guest uses, we are better able to attract owners that would not consider full ownership because of the distance & time constraints. 14 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation Look Who's Talking About Vacation Ownership Interval ownership has been in the press a lot over the last few years. With the new found interest by the public and the great improvements being offered by developers, newspapers and magazines from around the country have had a lot to report. ARDA recently compiled the following list of quotes from around the country. 15 East West Partners - Interval Ownership Presentation THE SUN Investor's Business Daily 1719, • • OCTOBER 1. 1997 JULY 13. 1998 APRIL 14. 1997 "More hotel firms have joined the Four million households own time- industry, bringing it credibility. Flexible Part of the appeal is the souped-up shares, a number that has more than timeshare packages have made resorts quality and the more desirable doubled since 1990. more attractive to consumers. And locations. overall, the industry has a better repu- The Advocate tation than it did in its early days dur- ing the `70s.71 i f 1 DULY 12. 1998 "We're selling an experience." MAY 7. 1997 "Sales of timeshare units in Florida in COASTAL 1996 totaled $817 million, 52 percent more than in 1992, the last time indus- L I VIG SEPTEMBER 3, 1997 try sales were measured in the state. ~ l "According to the American Resort NOVEMBER /DECEMBER 1997 Development Association, 35 percent of>tntg>bon gout" "Timeshares are a compelling proposi- Americans believe they have a 50-50 W# = tion for any vacationer who hankers for chanceof,.owning „a, second home. with - JULY 25, 1997 the amenities of a resort getaway, com ~4An the next l0 yea'.. "Timesharing, often found with beach- bined with the creature comforts of a front property, allows businesses and luxury second home. ~BladeJt' individuals to cut purchasing costs by asE rT FM BIT R 7: x 9 9.8 pooling money through a management Sunday News Journal - company„ "The opportunityto exchange was . AUGUST 3 1 , 1998 ranked as the most important motiva "Quality of accommodations, good tion for.purchasinf a timeshare by EL MANCIERO© value, desirability of the timeshare owners surveyed.1 unit, resort amenities and features, and J U N E 9. 1997 the ability to exchange to non-U.S. The Dekoilt Nem and *W "Timeshare market recovers despite resorts were cited by owners as highly- recession.~~ rated reasons for purchasing. 71 APRIL 13, 1997 "The industry is evolving for con- Travel 50 & Beyond NewS~la~ sumer demand and timeshare operators JUNE-AUGUST 1997 continually seek ways to expand the "Timeshare ownership, an industry AUGUST 24. 1997 number of vacation options. growing by leaps and bounds and show- "The number of U.S. households own- ~n n ing no sign of slowing. You can vaca- ing timeshares has reached 1,767,000, ""'s Anples 111e£ tion in some of the world's most d;~r- able places for the rest of your life. with a compounded annual growth rate MARCH 25, 1997 of 9 percent, according to a study "Timeshares are now very, very hot." released by the American Resort HOt"W~1 064 Development Association. 71 &MM NOVEMBER 16, 1998 FORTca_LNs "Baby boomers fuel growth of time- COL.ORADMN MARCH 30, 1997 share opportunities the industry « enjoyed a 25 percent increase in sales AUGUST 1 0, 1997 It [timeshare] has enjoyed a recent in 1997, with total sales of $2.72 billion "Buying a couple of weeks' ownership boost in popularity due to high quality in the U.S.11 in a condominium or a home is resorts, increased consumer protection sounding better and better to people and a better understanding of the own- Ocean Drive on vacation.1y ership concept. JANUARY 1998 The ()&Mo &n~ei "The timeshare experience is here to g stay Timeshares are particularly JULY lb 1997 suited for families or those who like to "Timeshare owners to receive tax vacation in groups.~l break." Patriot Ledger Houston Chronicle The Vail Trail DECEMBER 27. 1997 MAY 2-8. 1997 "The timeshare industry is making a JUNE 1, 1997 "The big players in the hospitality, indus- comeback from '80s black eye.77 "Better known as timesharing, the try are rolling out the vacation ownership interval form of vacation ownership red carpet. They've helped polish time- Denver Rocky Mountain News allows you to buy a piece of a fully-fur- share's tarnished image. Owners take a Y nished place for only a percentage of the great deal of pride in their units, and DECEMBER 26. 1997 cost of full ownership Variety is the there is a real sense of ownership. ~ l "Timeshares are better bargains than name of the game, and there are several buying condos for short-term use. 77 types of programs available so bu~ers are Zhcl ianDiegc better able to match their needs. Cos Angeleo dimes MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL i AUGUST 10. 1997 MAY 18. 1997 MARCH 15, 1998 "Florida's timeshare industry is, "They're [timeshares] a lifestyle investment. "Major hotel chains are jumping on booming.7~ the timeshare bandwagon.7~ Barter News Lodging Hospitality AUGUST 1997 APRIL J U14E, 199 Investor'7 s Business Daffy ~N - "Timeshares §--t~ Timeshares set sights on cities. Urban FEBRUARY 1 7 , 1998 «F.aCt holi day timeshares are theme' timeshares are growing in popularity." cc fastest growing segment'of the U.S " r Timeshare deals are getting better travef an'd tl unsm industry,. Travelers can find flexible schedules, Scottsdale Progress prices and more fun. xs,e Tribune a ~he non- 7 t o d r J U L Y 29, 1997 Southern Living APRIL 13. 1497 _ "Nationwide, timeshare sales have MA RC H 1998 cc soared 900 percent since 1980 and are The vast change in the American "Timeshare ownership has increased vacation lifestyle over the last 25 years the fastest growing segment~~f the nearly 900 percent since 1980." has had a profound effect on the time- travel and tourism industry. share market. 21 Hawaii Business $an NYancisco ~ an fficr Senior World of San JULY 1997 MAY 30. 1997 Diego "Today's prohibitive real estate prices "Some hotel experts say the urban JULY 1997 have made timeshares more attractive timeshare industry is on the rise.7~ to a broader market in comparison to Timeshares appear to be excellent » condominiums. News Gaurd alternatives to owning a vacation home, which is why the industry prefers the THE KANSAS CITY STAR. MAY z 8. 1997 moniker `vacation ownership' to `time- "Travel dreams come true with time- share'.JUNE 15. 1997 share exchanges.7~ "Never before have Americans been so Cornell Quarterly optimistic about their chances of own- Physicians Financial News JUNE-JULY 1997 ing a vacation home. Thirty-five per- JUNE 15. 1996 ccOwning a piece of a vacation provides cent of all U.S. households feel they "Developers are tailoring timeshares consumers a hedge against cost, time, have a better than ever chance of buy to suit wide economic spectrum.7~ and trouble. 11 ing recreational property. Business Monday TRAVELWEEKLY JUNE 21. 1997 "Timeshare properties growing and J U N E 19, 1997 gainin respect of industry and ccHawaii's timeshare industry attracts publicil 292,000 visitors a year who spend $370 million in the state, according to the 17 American Resort Development Association.yy Kalamazoo Gazette &UNUn.tisro xaminer NEWS & RECORD IULY 15. 1997 NOVEMBER 22. 1998 DECEMBER 7. 1997 «A home away from home - a time- "Timesharing grows up along with the "Forget the horror stories - interval sharing venture turns into vacations all boomers.... Aging baby boomers see ownership is more than it's cracked up over the world.11 their value. This is a crowd that is real to be. It has policed itself and now estate savvy, likes to use data-bases, enjoys a good reputation among tens of jfl~ ~I~wants flexibility in vacation planning thousands of tourists worldwide. Hoc K'1~NEWS and likes making creative investments. DQNA RED " Timeshares meet all of these tests.... The Palm Beach Post MAY 28, 1997 And for the busy baby boomers who "Timeshare: want certainty in all aspects of their NOVEMBER 9 . 1997 a home A way for visitors to own lives, timeshares may be the answer." "It's like a piece of Florida without the Inner-City Express hassles of actually buying real estate." Sun NOVEMBER 27, 1998 gL"M pol"li AUGUST i. 1997 uj » "The timeshare business is certainly Robust sales fuel timeshare boom. booming. The number of timeshare NOVEMBER 2. 1997 resorts in this country has m>; aced "The mass appeal of the timeshare for (the Uumbuu Diupatrh ;from 240 to more than.2,600 { visitors is being able to own property, but at a reasonable rice. Rather than DECEMBER 18, 1997 The Jew i sh Journal p ty purchasing a six-figure condo that sits "Satisfaction rates among Florida's " N O V»M'a .E FR r% 7"is 4 empty for most of the year, timeshare timeshare owners have soared, as 90 The timeshare investor~is relieved of._ owners buy time in a unit for a fraction percent report being satisfied with the the responsibility of abseriteeship own=` of the price.11 services, amenities, facilities and ership for the time when be is not upkeep of their resorts and units. The there, and he can choose a-wide-variety-- Vail Daily ability to use the vacation exchange of locations for his annual vacation. OCTOBER 5, 1997 option is cited by Florida owners as the -Timeshare units are spacious, with " primary motivation to purchase, and ample room to accommodate the entire Fractional ownership has whole ben- 73.9 percent state they have saved or family. The savings, compared to stay- cept of Times have fractional changed and the con- expect to save mone~7 on vacations ept ownership has spear con- - expect in a simple hotel room at a vacs- headed that change.l~ through ownership. tion destination, are impressive." Real Estate Weekly THE TAMPATMUNE S K I I N G NOVEMBER 12. 1997 andQe>S wQ 8 SEPTEMBER 1998 "The industry is attractive to Wall NOVEMBER 2, 1997 Street's investment bankers and bro- cc "We figured we could break even with- There are millions of happ owners. in three to four years, considering we kerage houses for a number of reasons. Otherwise, it wouldn't groTy go out West to ski twice a year. Compounded growth rate of the indus- try has historically been and continues Garden Island $4 to be 15 to 20 percent a year. In com- parison to the hotel industry, which NOVEMBER 19, 1997 until recently has been growing at 1 to "More and more consumers are reject- 1 u 1 Y z o . 1 9 9 8 2 percent a year, this ongoing expan- ing the theory that only the upper class "Industry studies indicate that con- sion explains the attractiveness of time- can afford a second home. sumer acceptance has never been high- sharing to major brand names and er for timeshares. The demand far out institutional investors.~7 paces the supply and the trend will continue in the foreseeable future." 18 Stages Record Courier FALL 1998 JULY 18. 1998 HOTHBUSINESS "But a timeshare can certainly be a "Some 7.5 million American house- N O V E B E R 2 0. 19 9 8 good buy for your vacation dollar. holds own some type of recreational Basically, you're buying a small piece of property." "Timeshare: Using new rules to grow a a vacation home -rather than the maturing industry. The industry is on whole thing - and for many middle- the verge of becoming the darling of class families (and couples or singles, of The Atlatrta Cor~stttut those in the know within the lodging industry. It offers a viable vacation course), that's an affordable alternative. JULY 29. 1998 The accommodations are more plush « alternative. And the customers are very, and spacious than any hotel room. And The idea is simple: When you buy a very happy.7y if you like to vacation at a resort -and timeshare, you buy occupancy of a con-nium can envision doing so for the next five Think of f it for this a specified period time. THE DENVER Posy' to ten years -timesharing is a money Think way: A condo is a small saver. You're locking in your vacations portion of a building, and a timeshare is N O V E M B E R s. 1998 ten years hence, at today's prices.77 a small portion of time carved out of a "More and more consumers are bu - single condos year. Occupancy periods y are called `intervals,' almost always one ing into the idea that owning a time- Post and Courier week. If you want longer vacations you share is a cost effective way to vacation. AUGUST 3. 1998 can buy multiple intervals.1y.. Developers have enhanced their prod- "An emerging trend from San ucts by introducing some creative pro- s grams, such as bonus use, split weeks Francisco to Boston to New Orleans and lock-off units. These types of inno- urban timeshares that tout the allure t y ,t;Y ~M~Ktvative options, combined with a rigor- of renaissance cities rather than the U LY `T2 s.9 s ous regulatory climate and a growing resort staples such as golf courses, - - - pools and beaches.y~ «Tfi&r who own a timeshare interval, :number of exchange opportunities, usually a week, and are knowledgeable have enhanced the success and popular and flexible can maximize;its trading appeal of the timeshare concept. power and-enjoy-lodging at thousands--_-- 111c3an»icgu JUNE 1 9 9 8 of resorts worldwide for a fraction of the cost of a comparable hotel stay.71Qn-(unQ. "Just think for a moment about the thousands of dollars you've spent on Arizona Business AUGUST 2 3 . 1998 vacation hotels over the past 10 years. Magazine "Exchange companies to into time- Why waste all that money when you share owner wanderlust.~~ could own a share of a fancy home or DECEMBER 1998 condo? This rationale has convinced "The newly polished image of the NEWS-PRESS over 1.7 million Americans that buying timeshare industry is paying off. Sales into a vacation timeshare is a much bet- of timeshares are booming and new ter deal. resort developments are springing up JULY 1 2 . 1998 Lodging Hospitality throughout the country. "Timeshare market is on the rise. AUGUST 15. 1998 The Montgomery County New Haven Register "It's not a cottage industry anymore, News JULY 12. 1998 especially with the public companies. NOVEMBER 10, 1998 "Traveling `boomers' are becoming There has been a huge influx of new "Today, owners can swap their week in timeshare vacation traders.~~ money. Now you have the weight and Orlando for a skiing trip in Vail, resources of Wall Street helping the Colorado, or switch a vacation in Palm ASBURY; PARK industry grow.7~ Beach for a week at the music mecca of PRESS the world, Branson, Missouri. ^ ER~, Worldwide, there are close to 5,000 OCTOBER 11. 1998 Joumm resorts to explore.71 "Timeshare industry has recovered SEPTEMBER 11. 1998 from troubled past." "I traded for three weeks in Europe and spent a week in Italy, Austria and Germany. I have been to a lot of exotic 19 places that I wouldn't have without having a timeshare.~l E, 6 The Commercial Appeal o Angele,e 07`melo JULY 13, 1998 LAS VEGAS SUN N O V E M B E R 1 . 1998 "Timeshares boom in the `90s to 4 A P R I L 21. 1998 "Timeshare exchanges take baggage million.l~ "This positive climate has permitted out of ownership. More buyers are timeshare resorts, in turn. to cultivate swapping their holdings for equivalent The Times-Picayune an upscale, loyal visitor base and con- digs elsewhere, breathing new life into JULY 19, 1998 tribute economically.~~ the industry.l~ "The resort-area timeshare can be a WAYLAND far more comfortable and convenient TomCwmc: place to stay than a conventional hotel. You can enjoy more space and living OCTOBER 8. 1 9 9 8 NOVEMBER 2. 1998 facilities than you typically get in a "hotel. And the ability to exchange "Home away from home: vacation get Record growth forces timeshares to worldwide means you can enjoy the aways rise in opularity as baby expand recruitment efforts. There's not boomers age. a lot of challenge to retain employees apart en t experience virtually any- once they come into the industry. It's a where. Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly very dynamic and fast-growth business. It's an excitinj story once they get here Modern Maturity OCTOBER NOVEMBER 1998 and touch it. F,~ R J U N E 1991 "For buyers, the attractions of a V0I "You pay ahead of time for I1fetlme (vacation ownership interval) purchase t i lse After'the seventh year ;'that vacs include being able to stay at an ameni- HEMISPHERES ~ i " ty-laden resort of known quality, as well onas .costing jusf.mainteriance and NOVEMBER 1998 excharige fees. And you're anowner:~~ as the prospect of putting their interval u._i..vK _ . . "When you buy a timeshare, you get ` into a pool in exchange or a stay at an ownership interest in a room or an other resort locations at various times apartment in a resort, an interest that ______Sun-Sentinel other than the interval they originally you can sell or bequeath, and you also purchased.11 get the right to occupy your unit for a JULY 12, 1998 specific week each year. It should not "Sunny days are back for Inman News Features be viewed as any kind of real estate timeshares; NOVEMBER 1 9 . 1998 investment. Nobody in the industry new laws, prominent names sway con- " even suggests that anymore. It should sumers. Timeshares have never been more be looked at as a prepaid vacation. 11 popular as acing boomers begin to see New Orleans their value. Selling to Seniors CITYBC)SINESS - DECEMBER 1998 OCTOBER 19. 1998 "Timeshares are increasingly attractive "Timesharing allows owners to feel a DECEMBER 1 9 9 8 to empty nesters and an older popula- sense of continuity without the hassles tion because they like the predictable that go with ownin a conventional "Why are timeshares springing up accommodations, convenience and vacation property.1 next to ski hills? Because people want quality timeshares offer.yy them. Timeshares attract many people for their convenience, the opportunity to trade, and low cost relative to buying property. 7 DRT DE A z ~ U Z y d " aolid~~ ARDA 1220 L S T R E E T, N. W. • SUITE 5 0 CP-0• WASH i N,G T O N. D. C. 2 0 0 0 5- 4 0 1 8 202.371'6700 F A x 202.289.8544 WWW.ARDA.0RG imeshart' Makin Sen se- flor M1,0111:t,80, ns o Ameritan, s The future looks bright for the history. In July, Grand Timber Millisor thinks the boom in sales them, for instance, to rent out a for the timeshare industry is prices when we move into the rgeoning business of vacation Lodge surpassed its previous is also due to the personalized part of their unit to recoup some growing at rapid pace. The building," Millisor says. (nership. Fueled by aggressive monthly sales record by a amenities available at the five-star costs, or use the unit for two long projected demand coupled with Meanwhile, the cost of lodging in trketing, the '$6-billion, newly whopping 70 percent, and then Grand Timber Lodge and the weekends instead of one full week. the current low interest rates the popular resort town continues personal attention paid to These types of innovative make now the best time to consider to increase at a rapid pace, making consumers and their needs. 'We see options, combined with a rigorous vacation ownership opportunities, vacation ownership opportunities the trends in the industry and regulmorv climate and a growing say the experts. seem even more appealing. recognize the demands of network of exchange Another tip from the experts: If you are thinking about consumers for tailor-made, opportunities, have enhanced the check out pre-construction sales purchasing a timeshare, experts n1"• • ~.t.,.~ affordable vacation-ownership ruccess and popular appeal of the opportunities for the best deals. suggest using this formula: a f ..v opportunities," he says. He also timeshare concept, and have points out that he personally knows helped the vacation ownership THE PROJECTED DEMAND - COUPLED WITH THE t L~ each of the company's 1,700 industry shed some negative CURRENT LOW INTEREST RATES - MAKE NOW THE BEST J, 1(' ; lw owners. perceptions of the past. TIME TO CONSIDER VACATION OWNERSHIP t , The first phase of the $25 million, The industry has also scored ski-in/ski-out Grand Timber Lodge points with the entrance into the OPPORTUNITIES, SAY THE EXPERTS. broke ground last fall on Peak 9 of business by some big-name Often the best time to buy a Determine how much you would the renowned Breckenridge Ski companies with solid reputations timeshare unit is when the resort spend each year renting a nice f# Resort. The project consists of 46 heavy hitters such as Disney, is under construction. when vacation hotel room in [lie two-bedroom lock-off units, and 10 Hyatt,_ Four Seasons and the prices tend to be lowest. destination of your choice, and lamed vacation-ownership proceeded to break that record three-bedroom lock-off units, with Marriott. These companies are The lower prices off0red during compare that amount to what a lustry is growing by 16 percent a three months in a row. prices ranging from $12,000 to spending millions of dollars pre-construction is another likely timeshare would cost per year, ar with more and more 'The sales pace has just been $45,000. Amenities include developing timeshare resorts reason that Breckenridge's Grand including' up-front expenses. nsumers buying into the idea explosive,' says Michael Millisor, a underground parking,- indoor- around the world, further Timber Lodge h:u shattered sales annual fees and maintenance. it owning a timeshare is a cost- partner in the project with his outdoor swimming pool, steam and increasing exchange opportunities records. "Grand Timber is just Also make sure to chose a ective way to vacation. brother Robert. 'Everyone's sauna room, outdoor hot tubs, for owners. Their development of now coming out of the ground, so company with a good reputation The American Resort getting on board." massage room and 24-hour check-in upscale, consistent products has we have great pre-construction that belongs to a reputable svelopment Association Millisor credits the success to the desk. lent credibility to the industry and deals, but I'm confident we'll raise exchange network. :im* ates that about 4.5 million fact that more and more people are "This is the nicest, newest, in- helped to capture the attention of useholds hold a vacation more affluent consumers: ~y + ( t. .(~f f. 11 S }f tf ~:~,•nF,l i ,nership interest in one of more For their part, consumers are fn~ FOR MOST FAMILIES, WHETHER ITS SKIING IN COLORADO OR ?n 4,500 timeshare resorts pleased with not only the idea of •oughout the world. The number FROLICKING IN THE SUN, TIMESHARING HAS PROVEN TO BE owning their vacations, but the 21 owners is growing even in THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE MEANS AVAILABLE TO TAKE FIVE reality of it as well. A 1997 survey tii'a':,•i t h s. t. - k y • unities were timeshare resorts STAR VACATIONS EVERY YEAR. by the American Resort not yet exist, and all indications Development Association found r r int to continued growth in years realizing the financial benefits of town, ski-in/ski-out resort in the that 85.2 percent of vacation owners come. owning their vacations. 'Vacation Rocky Mountains," Millisor says. were satisfied with their purchase.. In Colorado, timeshare sales ownership allows consumers to build Timeshare developers such as the By all signs, the upswing in tf*+~ ve exploded in mountain resort equity and have something to pass on Millisor's have enhanced their vacation ownership sales is likely to CO C0-BO 080 - ' ' • = i „~;M GAILY NEWSPAPER vns such as Breckenridge. The to their heirs, while also allowing products by introducing some continue. The average age of DENVER PDST vn's newest vacation ownership them to vacation in the place of their creative programs, such as bonus today's vacation ownership buyer Denver, CO tort, Grand Timber Lodge, choice every year," he says. 'This is use, split weeks and lock-off units. is 48, and with 75 million j !l f :ently recorded the most prolific an inexpensive wav to take a great These options greatly increase the Americans projected to enter their Clrt - (M) 354.102(S) 490,738 es in the company's 14-year vacation for the rest ofyour life.' ' flexibility of owners, allowing 50s in the next 18years, the market r. S i` " For instance, a time share week in a two-bedroom unit in Orlando, Time Share Exchanges Take Fla., may cost $12,000, which gives the owner the right to use it for one week every year for 20 years, 30 Baggage Out of Ownership years, or forever, depending on the I deed. (Many weeks are deeded in ' "That became the number-one perpetuity and are handed down to ¦ Travel: More buyers are reason people bought the product," heirs). said Ed McMullen of Orlando, Fla., Spread over 20 years, that's $600 swapping their holding a time-share developer for 21 a year, plus about another $400 in for equivalent digs years who helped Marriott and annual maintenance fees. Staying Hilton enter the market and r>ow in comparable accommodations elsewhere, breathing new chairs the industry group Ameri- likely would cost twice as much. life into the industry- W Resort Development A-9.9 . "I like the fact that I know Tm j / For most travelers, the time- going to take a nice vacation every - ear," Kim Craig said. By KEN KUSMER share industry represents the i year," shares are available in ASSOCIATED PRESS 'pushy salesmen who use high- every U.S. state and 90 nations, pressure sales practices in an at- I from sunny Caribbean resorts to INDIANAPOLIS-Sam and Kim tempt to lure potential buyers. busy midtown Manhattan. They Craig were newlyweds when they Although 90 percent of those who range in price from $20,000 or more decided to buy a time share in Las sit through a sales pitch walk away per week for a three-bedroom Vegas five years ago. without buying anything, there's condo in high season, to as little as Since then, they've used it ex- the other 10 percent. actly twice, once for just a week- The Craigs were in that group. the off -for aseasonweek in a studio during end. During one of their occasional trips the of. But they've also swapped it for Last year, 42% of the time to Las Vegas, a resort asked if the United States weeks at Lake Tahoe and skiing at they'd listen to a pitch for owning a shares were owned in exchanged, the ARDA United statistics Vail, Colo. After their two children `,reek of lodging there, every year. show. Only 39% were used by the were born, the Craigs, who moved "They got us in the door with the households that owned them. from. San Jose, Calif., to Raleigh, free show tickets," Kim Craig, 36, The larger of the two exchange N.C., traded it for weeks at Hilton recalled. companies, Indianapolis-based Ae- Head, S.C., and in the North Caro- The Craigs, both accountants, sort Condominiums International lina mountains. hesitated to sign a contract, so the Inc., arranged 1.8 million ex- The Craigs are among 4 million developer sweetened the offer with changes last year, or nearly one for households that own time shares, a more free tickets. The couple each of its 2.3 million members, number that has more than signed the next day, paying a through a network of 3,200 affili- doubled since 1990. About 1.8 mil- one-time price of $8,000 for a week ated resorts. The other company, lion of those owners reside in the every year in a one-bedroom con- Miami-based Interval Interna- United States, where the industry dominium in the Ramada Suites tional, has 850,000 members. RCI has recovered from its troubled Grand Flamingo resort off the members cannot exchange through infancy in the 1970s. In all, people Sip. Interval, but about 50 resorts are in 190 countries own time shares. Those who own a time share affiliated with both companies. Much of the credit for the indus- . interval, usually a week, and are "The idea of the exchange was try's growth goes to two exchange knowledgeable and flexible can really to fulfill that consumer need companies which, for the past 24 maximize its trading power and of bringing variety and flexibility years, have helped time share enjoy lodging at thousands of re- to a product that otherwise would owners swap weeks they own in sorts worldwide for a fraction of I rather stale," said Cris- one place for different weeks the cost of a comparable hotel stay._ i havtele e been an, a former owner of RCI, somewhere.else. which is now owned by Cendant Corp., of Stamford, Conn., the fran- chiser of the Ramada, Days Inn and Howard Johnson lodging brands. The relationship between the resorts and the exchange compa- nies is very simple, she said. "One LOS ANGELES TIMES could not exist without the other." In RCI's recently opened, $28- LOS ANGELES, CA million call center in Indianapolis, s U N D AY 1,391,076 700 "vacation counselors" are at work handling 90,000 calls per N O V 1 1998 week. In addition to incoming calls, 22 the counselors call members to solicit condo space that's in de- mand but not yet offered. Please see SWAP, C10 1 ' SWAP:, 42% of U. S. Time Shares Exchanged in '97 I Continued from Cl Internet auctioneer Ons ale Inc. different and `changing popula- j ( unow.onsale.com) . tion." An RCI exchange works like Developers also rent out their In more ways than., one..The j this: Members place their time- own unsold space at rock-bottom demographics of time share owners share week into a pool managed by rates to get potential buyers onto are changing, said Dick Ragatz, an ! RCI and choose a week of compa- the property. One of the largest, industry researcher since the 1970s rable value deposited by another Sunterra Resorts, sells a two-bed- who sold his consulting business to member. The company says 60% of room condo at Cypress Pointe less RCI two years ago. its members' vacation requests are than a mile from Walt Disney Time shares originally were filled within 24 hours. Members can give up their lime- World in Orlando for $444 a week marketed as vacation retreats. to I share space, and request a different in September. The catch: guests middle-.income consumers who one, as much as two years or as must take a 90-minute "tour" couldn't afford a second home. The where they'll get a sales pitch. arrival of major brands such as little an two weeks in advance. Those represent two of the ways Disney and Marriott since the mid- The savvy ones learn early on the industry is trying to capture 1980s improved the industry's im- how the system works. more of the aging baby boomers age, but also raised the rates. As a "We do try to plan our vacation a who are placing premiums on their result, those in the $35,000-$60,000 year ahead of time, so we can get' leisure time as rewards for the. annual income group are being the destination we want," Kim .`hard work they've put into._.their priced out of upscale develop- "The thing with the : Craig said. g careers. ments. trading, you have to do early. "We have this huge public that's Ragatz said there's more room You can d it later, but then you earning more than they ever havq for budget-class developments. have to he flexible service, RCI charges in their life and who may be "The market's going to be For th approaching semiretirement," said broadened," Ragatz said from his members per year, plus ex- John Reinhardt, RCI's senior vice office in Eugene, ..Ore. Also, "I change fees s o of $110 domestic, re- president of global resorts salts think we're going to be marketing international. Members aren't re- and service. "We're dealing with a more to singles than in the past." sponsible if the time they've ve given up isn't taken by someone else. RCI tries to keep the property full by offering special deals to members on unused units; typically $149 for three nights or $299 for a week. Even then, not all of the mem- bership's time share space is claimed, providing a pool of unused condominium time that RCI is making available to nonmembers who want to sample the time-share market. Beginning in August, the space will be. marketed through. 23 To: Vail Town Council From: Suzanne Silverthorrv Subject: Employee Housing in nshead Date: March 8, 1999 These clippings from the Vail Trail archives could be helpful to you during ongoing Lionshead discussions with constituents. Conclusion: With respect to employee housing, the Common Ground and Lionshead plans aren't a whole lot different than what was discussed in 1979. Back then, Terry Minger said it best: "We're really missing an opportunity by not building the housing." You may want to develop some key messages based on Vail's past experience in the order of: Let's not let this opportunity pass us by for another 20 years. Fe h. 23 1979 _ 1 he;Lionshead Parking Su uctiuc, rcvi ,ti J at 4 public n ccc,, n8 rhs ,,eck, was received coolly by local residents. The proposal included 1,076 new parkin, spaces 50 one bedroom and 50 h~o-bedroom 'apattments and a grand total of 25,000 feet of commercial space. Some citizens felt the actual number of parking spaces gamed would be'inadequate given the increased parking, requirements for the residential and commercial space Other residents' criticized the cost ofthe project, voicing concerns that the'actu,tl numh r of spaces galncd would be inad- equate!considering the cost. , March 2, 1979 At a Fail Town Council stork session. the council and affieials from Vail Associates decided that public xmmneut was agaiuat building employee housing in Lionshead' but there titian favorable reaction to building a parkingstnicture. `We're really missing an opportunity by not building the housing," said Town Manager Terry Minger "The opportunity to get type of cooperation from private'buisincss will probably never happen again." AA At TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road [pail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 3, 1999 Contact: Nina Timm, 479-2144 Town of Vail Housing Coordinator TOV ANNOUNCES SALES PRICE, PUBLIC LOTTERY SCHEDULE FOR EAST VAIL BUY-DOWN UNIT (Vail)--A public lottery will be held on April 8 to select the winning buyer of Vail's first affordable housing "buy-down" unit. The property, a free market condominium unit at 4093 Spruce Way in East Vail, was purchased by the town earlier this week for $156,500. It will now be deed restricted, then re-sold through the housing lottery at a reduced price of $140,000. The new sales price is comparable to the purchase prices developed for buyers of the Red Sandstone townhomes, sponsored by the Town of Vail and the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District. Lottery applications for the East Vail unit will be available from the Town of Vail Community Development Department beginning at 8 a.m. March 5. Applications will be due at noon on March 22. For those who have already completed lottery applications, the information needs only to be brought up to date. The 816 sq. ft. unit is newly remodeled. It will be shown at an open house from 4 to 6 p.m. March 8 and again from 9 to 11 a.m. March 10. It's a top floor unit with two-bedrooms, one-bath, gas heat, fireplace, excellent views, two assigned parking spots, laundry facilities within the building and easy access to the Town of Vail bus system. Monthly condominium does are $295.11, which includes heat. (more) RECYCLED PAPER Add 1 /East Vail Housing Lottery To qualify for the lottery, applicants must: • currently own no other real estate in Eagle County • use the residence as an owner-occupied primary home • work in Eagle County a minimum of 30 hours per week over the course of a year and plan to continue working that same amount until the sale of the property or retirement • agree to a re-sale cap of 3 percent annual appreciation As an affordable deed restricted unit, the sale will be exempt from the town's real estate transfer tax. Nina Timm, the town's housing coordinator, says interest in the unit is high. "We've had numerous calls on this property, and we already have a long list of people who've asked to be notified about the next lottery," she said. "This is a good time to make a purchase while interest rates are still low." The Vail Town Council has set aside $100,000 in the 1999 budget to purchase and re-sale 5 units this year, which provides for a "buy-down" subsidy of up to $20,000 per unit. The sales transaction of the East Vail unit was completed March 1 with unanimous support by members of the Town Council. For more information on the housing lottery or to request an application, contact Nina Timm in the Town of Vail Housing Division at 479-2144. TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 MEDIA ADVISORY March 3, 1999 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office VAIL TOWN COUNCIL HIGHLIGHTS FOR MARCH 2 Work Session Briefs Council members present: Armour, Arnett, Foley, Ford, Jewett, Kurz, Navas --Luncheon with Mammoth Lakes Elected Officials Town Council members and staff met with their Mammoth Lakes, Calif., counterparts for a lunch and discussion at LaBotega from noon until the start of the work session. Discussions involved a variety of topics, including: employee/affordable housing; transportation; skier days; revenue collections; Vail's ski lift tax; zoning incentives for redevelopment; and community and guest facilities. Although the two communities have much in common, it was also agreed that the differing stages of development have created dissimilar problems and challenges. In addition to Vail, the 28 member California delegation will be visiting Beaver Creek, Steamboat Springs, Crested Butte, Keystone, Breckenridge, Aspen, and other Colorado resorts as they put together a cross-section of their collective findings. --Lionshead Zone Districts During its first review of an ordinance that would create two new mixed use zone districts in Lionshead to implement the newly-approved Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, the Council directed staff to amend the draft to more closely mirror permitted and conditional uses within Lionshead's existing zone district, known as. Commercial Core II. Those changes include limiting permitted uses to lodging, employee housing or other residential-based units on a building's second floor or above, while commercial-type uses would be allowed by conditional use on those floors. Councilmembers said the change would be more reflective of Council's goal to use the upper floors to increase Vail's bed-base. Other issues raised by Council during yesterday's review included: the need to complete a town-wide parking analysis to determine the future status of the parking-pay-in-lieu option and the need to review the town's provisions for time share, fractional fee units and interval ownership. In addition, Councilmembers expressed concern about a proposal to require applicants within the Lionshead zone districts to mitigate direct impacts of their development on public infrastructure. As proposed, developers would be required to help mitigate project impacts through roadway improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, stream tract/bank improvements, public art improvements and other similar improvements. Jim Lamont of the East Village Homeowners Association suggested the mitigation impacts be debated and applied townwide rather than the two Lionshead zone districts. While Councilmembers Michael Arnett and Sybill Navas wondered if the mitigation requirement would discourage redevelopment, senior planner Dominic Mauriello said the provision was intended to alert developers early-on as to possible requirements rather than surprising developers with unforeseen conditions at the time of approval. Also, according (more) RECYCLED PAPER Add 1/TOV Council Highlights/3-2-99 to Mauriello, mitigation would be intended to be balanced with the primary goal of providing incentives for redevelopment. Due to the extent of changes in the draft ordinance, Councilmembers agreed to postpone first reading of the ordinance to the March 16 evening meeting. The ordinance also will be reviewed at the March 9 work session. For more information, contact Dominic Mauriello in the Community Development Department at 479-2148. --Lionshead Rezoning During a brief review of a companion ordinance that would rezone properties in Lionshead in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Councilmembers Sybill Navas and Michael Arnett questioned the appropriateness of allowing commercial uses within the residential areas. Also, Jim Lamont of the East Village Homeowner's Association expressed similar points, as well as concerns for the retention of public parking and adequate loading and delivery areas. The ordinance will be reviewed again at the March 9 work session with first reading scheduled for the March 16 evening meeting. For more information, contact Dominic Mauriello in the Community Development Department at 479-2148. --Supplemental Appropriation In preparation for the evening meeting, the Council reviewed a report from Finance Director Steve Thompson detailing a $4.3 million proposed supplemental appropriation to the 1999 budget. All but $146,000 of the appropriation reflects projects budgeted in 1998, but not yet completed. One of those projects, raising the Manor Vail bridge to allow improved access into Ford Park, will be bid. However, Councilmembers asked to review the bids and associated costs of the project before authorizing the work. Another project is construction of the free right onto the eastbound ramp of 1-70 at the Main Vail roundabout. Mayor Rob Ford suggested scheduling completion of the project before July 4 or later in the fall. The full appropriation was later approved on first reading at the evening meeting. For more information, contact Steve Thompson at 479-2116. --Information Update Councilmembers were reminded of Friday's employee party to celebrate the success of the World Alpine Ski Championships. The gathering will take place from 5 to 7 p.m. at the Dancing Bear. The Council agreed to accept donation of the two Vail 99 countdown clocks from the Vail Valley Foundation. One is located at Slifer Plaza in Vail Village; the other in Beaver Creek. The Beaver Creek clock will be relocated to the Lionshead bus stop. Both devices will be used to communicate information about special events, road closures and other announcements. Councilmembers were invited to join the Avon Town Council for dinner on April 1 with a time and location to be determined. In response to a request from the Vail Alpine Garden Foundation, the Council voted 6-0 (Kevin Foley was absent during the vote) to redirect a $10,000 pledge originally set aside for construction of the proposed education center. Instead, the $10,000 was authorized to be used for the final phase of construction of the rock garden, which is now underway. Councilman Michael Jewett explained that he had withdrawn as the Council's representative to the Alpine Garden Board of Directors. This is because he had been offered a non-voting position on the board, which Jewett said would be unacceptable. The Council then directed Town Manager Bob McLaurin to appoint a staff member to serve in that capacity. Due to complaints about a foul odor at the entry to the Vail Village parking structure, Assistant (more) } I Add 21TOV Council Highlights/3-2-99 Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer said crews had been attempting to pinpoint and rectify the problem, and town staff believe they have successfully achieved this. Regarding the town's purchase of its first buy-down housing unit earlier in the week, Town Attorney Tom Moorhead said the unit would be placed into a public lottery with deed restrictions mirroring the restrictions established for the Vail Commons and Red Sandstone units. The resale price will be based on parameters established earlier by Council, he said, which provides for an average subsidy of $20,000 a piece for up to 5 units. --Council Reports Ludwig Kurz said the Vail Valley Arts Council has turned over operation of the annual Vail Arts Festival to the Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau. The Beaver Creek Arts Festival will be run by the Beaver Creek Resort Company This action was taken after the Vail Valley Arts Council folded its operations earlier in the year due to budget constraints. Assistant Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer said the Vail Valley Tourism Bureau would likely ask the Council to reallocate a $3,000 grant originally earmarked to the Arts Council to help fund the Vail Arts Festival event. In preparation for the evening meeting, Rob Ford gave an update on the Eagle County Recreation Authority and the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). Ford said he also was continuing to work with the other partners in the authority to express Vail's desire to accommodate housing for seasonal workers as part of the proposed housing mix on the property. The IGA was later turned down by a 4-3 vote at the evening meeting. Michael Arnett reported on his attendance at a Town of Vail-Vail Associates Community Task Force meeting in which members attempted to articulate a vision for Vail, along with goals and strategies. A request for a van-pooling program also was forwarded to Kevin Foley, who represents the town on the Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority. Evening Session Briefs Council members present: Armour, Arnett, Foley, Ford, Jewett, Kurz, Navas --Citizen Participation Scotty Magoun, a former Town of Vail bus driver, appeared before the Council to inquire about the status of a small claims suit the town had filed against him, and later dropped. Mayor Rob Ford encouraged Magoun to schedule a meeting with the town manager. Next, Anne Esson, representing a group described as the Vail Tomorrow expanded housing team, offered the group's support to place seasonal housing on the town-owned Mountain Bell site north of the Main Vail roundabout, as well as other compatible uses such as a fire station. She asked the Council to fast-track the project so ground could be broken later in the summer. Other citizens echoing Esson's request and expressing an interest in becoming involved in the planning process included Farrow Hitt, Steve Rosenthal, Carol Hymers, Dennis Jones, Sally Jackle, Paul Hymers and Kaye Ferry. Ferry said the group has agreed that the Mountain Bell site is least controversial as a seasonal housing site, given its isolation from other neighborhoods. In addition, she noted that Real Estate Transfer Taxes were not involved in the land's purchase. Ferry asked the town for a commitment to move forward with the site planning so occupancy could occur in the fall of 1999. In addition, Jerry Sibley asked the town to consider relocating the ABC School and the Learning Tree day care operations to the Vail Commons space. (more) k f Add 3/TOV Council Highlights/3-2-99 In response, Mayor Rob Ford said he'd been "knocked off his feet" by the group's eagerness to move forward on the housing issue. He said a public process would be initiated in the next 30 to 45 days to move forward with the planning. This work will follow some preliminary studies now underway by architect Bill Pierce regarding the suitability of a site for a two-company fire station. Pierce has been studying two possible sites: a portion of the Mountain Bell property, as well as the Spraddle Creek trailhead'site. --Supplemental Appropriation The Council voted 7-0 to approve first reading of an ordinance to provide a supplementation appropriation to the 1999 budget. Please see work session briefs for details. --Lionshead Code Changes After summarizing the review that occurred earlier in the day at the work session, the Council voted 7-0 to table first reading of the Lionshead code change ordinance and a companion rezoning ordinance to the March 16 evening meeting. During the public comment period, Jim Lamont of the East Village Homeowner's Association suggested contacting condominium associations in Lionshead to let them know about the proposed changes. He also suggested consideration of boundary modifications for the rezoning as well as the need to review the parameters for time share units, fractional fee units and interval ownership. Representing Vail Associates, David Corbin asked Council to consider adding flexibility to the list of permitted uses rather than shifting to conditional uses. In particular, he asked that uses associated with lodges, such as meeting rooms, conference facilities and recreational facilities, be allowed as permitted uses on the second floor of buildings or higher (rather than conditional uses). Corbin also asked Council to consider flexibility in defining lodging products, such as time share units and fractional fee units. For more information, contact Dominic Mauriello in the Community Development Department at 479-2148. --Eagle County Recreation Authority Intergovernmental Agreement The Council voted 4-3 (Arnett, Kurz, Ford) to reject an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Eagle County Recreation Authority (Berry Creek 5th) and the Eagle County School District. The IGA had sought to convey specific properties between the two entities to allow for a mixed use development on the adjoining parcels. But in making a motion to reject the IGA, Councilman Michael Jewett said he's wasn't comfortable with the document in its current form. Jewett listed issues such as cost-sharing and the need to place a conservation easement on an open space parcel as reasons why he couldn't support the current IGA. Sybill Navas raised issues about water rights and cost-sharing, while Bob Armour expressed concerns about the continuation of Vail's 60 percent cost-sharing requirement. Earlier in the day, Michael Arnett had asked if the IGA wasn't placing the "cart before the horse" because of continuing discussions about the property's affordable housing component. --Town Manager's Report Bob McLaurin indicated the Federal Highway Administration and the Colorado Department of Transportation have approved the town's request to construct a free right onto the eastbound ramp of 1-70 at the Main Vail roundabout. He said the project would be bid in the next 60 days. (more) Add 41TOV Council Highlights/3-2-99 UPCOMING DISCUSSION TOPICS March 9 Work Session Interview Applicants for Vail Valley Marketing Board Interview Applicants for Planning and Environmental Commission Discussion of A-Frame Affordable Housing Development Program Lionshead Code Amendment and Rezoning March 16 Work Session Interview Applicants for Design Review Board Interview Applicants for Art In Public Places Board Senior Citizen Survey Mailing Discussion of Marriott Special Development District March 16 Evening Meeting Appointment of Vail Valley Marketing Board Member Appointment of Planning and Environmental Commission Members Appointment of Design Review Board members Appointment of Art In Public Places Board members First Reading, Marriott Special Development District Second Reading, Supplemental Appropriation First Reading,.Lionshead Code Amendment First Reading, Lionshead Rezoning March 23 Work Session PEC/DRB Review Discussion of Model Traffic Code Discussion of City Market/Bring Horizon Space TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 1, 1999 Contact: Rob Ford, 479-1860 Vail Mayor Bob McLaurin, 479-2105 Vail Town Manger Historic Milestone... TOV PURCHASES FIRST AFFORDABLE HOUSING "BUY-DOWN" UNIT (Vail)--In what may be the only program of its kind in the country, the Town of Vail today (3-1) purchased its first free-market condominium unit, representing an expansion of the town's employee housing efforts. The unit will now be re-sold to a qualified buyer at a reduced price, along with a new deed-restriction that will maintain the property as affordable housing in the future. The "buy-down" program is one of several affordable housing actions identified by the town's Common Ground program. The new property owner will be selected through a public lottery to be scheduled in the coming weeks. The Town of Vail paid $156,500 for the property. The unit is an 816 sq. ft. newly-remodeled condo featuring two-bedrooms, one-bath, great views, as well as off-street parking and easy access to the Town of Vail bus system. The property is located at 4093 Spruce Way in East Vail. The sales transaction was completed earlier today (3-1) with unanimous support by members of the Vail Town Council. Once the deed-restriction is in place, the condo will be re-sold to a qualified buyer. The new sales price and the schedule for the public lottery will be determined later this week. After evaluating the numbers and comparing the property to other offerings, Vail Mayor Rob Ford said the purchase makes good sense. "It's a good investment. It's less than the cost of (more) ~4M RECYCLEDPAPER Add 1/Buy-Down new construction and it helps to integrate our deed-restricted housing throughout the community, which is what we heard during the Common Ground process," he said. In addition, the new buyer will be able to move in immediately rather than waiting for completion of construction. 'Although newly implemented, the buy-down concept has been considered for some time, Ford said. "I understand that Tom Steinberg brought it up regularly during his tenure on Council. He deserves much of the credit for his tenacity." The Council has set aside $100,000 in the 1999 budget to purchase and re-sale 5 buy-down units. Vail Town Manager Bob McLaurin says officials in Aspen and Boulder will be monitoring Vail's program closely. Although both communities are considered to be leaders in the affordable housing effort, neither one has a buy-down program, he said. "We've modeled so many of our existing housing programs after Aspen, in particular, that it would be especially rewarding if we were able to break new ground for them, as well as other communities," McLaurin said. In addition to the buy-down unit, the town is currently a partner in construction of the 18-unit for-sale development at Red Sandstone, which will be completed in July. Other town-sponsored affordable housing initiatives include: a six-unit for-sale development on Arosa-Garmisch in West Vail; redevelopment of two units on the town-owned A-frame site on lower Arosa Dr.; and 200 housing units on the Berry Creek Fifth property in Edwards, of which Vail would control distribution of 45 for-sale units and 45 rental units. For information on the upcoming housing lottery or to request an application, contact Nina Timm in the Town of Vail Housing Division at 479-2144. TOWN COUNCIL COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE APPOINTMENTS TO: Town Council FR: Pam Brandmeyer DA: March 3, 1999 RE: Committee/Task Force Appointments This is a list of all committees/task forces to which Council members have been appointed or for which they have volunteered. It is my understanding that all assignments run to the next Regular Municipal Election, November 1999. COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. NWCCOG Sybill Navas 2. NWCCOG Water Quality/ Sybill Navas Quantity Committee 3. Vail Valley Tourism & Mike Arnett & Convention Bureau Rob Ford, alternate (formerly VRA) 4. CAST Bob Armour Bob McLaurin 5. VRD/Council Subcommittee Kevin Foley Ross Davis Rob Ford Chris Moffett 6. Special Events Committee Sybill Navas 7. Bravo! Colorado Board Mike Jewett Michael Arnett 8. Eagle County Recreation Rob Ford Authority Ludwig Kurz 9. Town of Vail Housing Authority Michael Arnett 10. Channel 5 Vail Valley Community Television Board Ludwig Kurz 11. Art In Public Places Sybill Navas Rob Ford 12. Mauri Nottingham Environmental Michael Arnett Award 13. Vail Valley Exchange/Sister Cities Sybill Navas Mike Jewett, at large 14. Eagle County Regional Transportation Kevin Foley Authority Rob Ford, Alternate 15. Ford Park Management Plan Kevin Foley 16. The Chamber Sybill Navas 17. Open Space/Charter Committee Sybil] Navas 18. Colorado Ski Museum and Ski Hall of Fame Ludwig Kurz 19. Town of Vail/Vail Associates Task Force Rob Ford Sybill Navas 20. Eagle Valley Leadership Coalition Rob Ford 21. Mountain Crew Tom Moorhead 22. Vail Youth Recognition Award Sybill Navas 23. Vail Alpine Garden Foundation Board Todd Oppenheimer? CATCAPPTSIST Baay>tnn. mamba;-N99., 1',J'', Wail's website: More information than you can shake a mouse at After the warn reception I got for my review of vail.net/community/inititum, I figured that the Internet site for die Town of Vail also deserved a good going over. Vail's website, www.vail.net/com- munity/tov, is chock full of informa- tion about the town government, and well, actually, it doesn't go much ' h ' beyond government information. Which makes sense; the website is designed primarily to give visitors information about the town and its WEB VIEWS plans and is not designed as a tool to ALEX[ ZENTNER pull tourists to the area, something * * that snowcom and www.vailnet.com take care of pretty well. When you open up www.vail.net/commuDityltov, the website is up front about being a "resource for information about the Vail Town Council, meetings and events across all TOV departments and current projects" While surfers are not given anything more than what they are promised by the website, the wcbsite certainly delivers. Essentially, if it has to do with Vail as a government entity, this wcbsite has the answer (but if it does not have the answer you are looking for, there is an option to request more information). But you will be hard pressed to have a question about the Vail government - at least if you are talking about current affairs - that is not answered on the town council page. Aside from pictures and short biographies of town council members (Michael Jewett is mysteriously missing any bio information, unless you count tht date ofhis election and when his term expires as solid information), the town council page has a-mail links to the town council members. It also includes a link to the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments under council member Sybill Navas's biography- just in case you are interested in checking out the NWCCOG. For Web visitors who are interested, in more than just learn- ing about their favorite local politicians, the town council page also includes council highlights, agendas for the upcoming work sessions, evening meeting agendas, upcoming discussion topics, town manager's reports, meeting minutes, ordinances and proclamations, resolutions, press releases and upcoming town meetings. For the most part, unless you are a policy wonk like I am, this information will not be ofparticular interest. Between'ITre Vail Dud and Daily Trail, most interesting news out of the Town of Vail government tends to get covered. Off of the main page, the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan gets some ink, although the entire 50-page document is not made available. While the summarization is nice, I ques- tion Vail's policy, at least as outlined on this Web page, of sell- ing individual copies of the entire plan for $50. It seems like there is no reason why drey""couldn't have included a link allowing interested people to download the document for free. The website also includes a jobs link-an excellent idea for any potential employer in the Vail Valley Most people who show the initiative and ability to browse your website for employment information are already shmving themselves a step ahead of the game. And in an area like Vail, where there is a perennial shortage of workers, any way to spread the mes- sage that you are hiring is a good idea. The Vail Tomorrow page features a fairly open letter from Mayor Rob Ford, who, in part, says that he does riot think that Vail can afford another election defeat of a community facili- ty. The page does not work well, however, because of layout problems that make it difficult to separate Ford's message from some of the other text on the page. Vail.net/conimunity/tov also features a link to the Vail Public Library, but a review of area libraries' websites remains for the future. Overall, Vails website is well done. It provides extensive information about the municipal government. It is designed as a tool for citizens, and works as a tool for citizens. T 'RECEIVED ~ MM e 1026 North Moraine Dr ev' 6~i~ Vail, Colorado 81657 (970) 479-0861 jldy and Stye Fox March 5, 1999 Town of Vail, Colorado Attn: Rob Ford, Mayor 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mayor Ford, The Town is to be commended for its part in the management of, and the success of the recent World Alpine Ski Championships. We are writing to express some observations that we hope can be taken into account, should the Town host such a large event in the future. ,lt occurs .16, us that parking and transportation are.among the most sacred and controversial matters in our town. Therefore, we would request that the town not allow the transportation center to be used to the detriment of the taxpaying citizens. The Frontier Center deprived us of needed parking at a critical time and was generally an affront and competitor to our merchants. The closure of the transportation center and the public restrooms, coupled with the overbearing security-in that area was not in the best merest of the community. In addition, we have worked hard to avoid traffic signals and other ostentatious displays. Please, let's not allow another countdown timer in our town please let's order the one at the side of the Mountain Haus dismantled immediately. From what we heard, the FIS would like to.come back. And with good reason Vail is a special place. Next time, .let's keep it that way for our.residents -as well as for our guests. The Town of Vail has no reason to compromise its.principles to attract these games. If the FIS wants to play here, they should honor our Town's values. We hope you and the council will take the appropriate actions now to ensure that the Town is not asked to compromise in the future. Very truly yours, . Judy and Stev Fox 3-05-1999 5:35PM FROM LODGE AT LIONSHEAD 9704799536 P_2 Ur;r~ the Lodge at LionSHead DATE: March S, 1999 TO: Mayor Rob Ford and Vail Town Council Members FROM: Jim Miller, President Lionshead Phase ll Association RE: Lodge at Lionshead Dear Mayor and Town Council Members: Consistent with our position of refraining from taking any positions regarding the Lionshead Master Plan until the plan was fully implemented and ready for council ordinances, we now wish to convey to you our positions: 1. Generally speaking we are enthusiastic about the Lionshead Master Plan and the encouragement it should give to redeveloping Lionshead. We appreciate the time and effort of many people, lead by the council in this endeavor. 2. Positive positions for the Lodge at Lionshead: A. We wish to preserve and enhance the peace and tranquillity of East Lionshead Circle. It is. a residential area - we want to keep it that way. B. Rerouting the TOV bus is a welcome event. C. Eliminating truck, bus, and skier unloading at the circle is a big plus. D. Eliminating the bus, trailer, and truck parking in the east zoning ordinance is violated day by parking lot is desired. At present the every y y people living in vehicles, overstaying the time limit, etc. This should be converted to aid parking or closed. E. Streetscaping plan is very desirable as long as you do not encroach on our property and present landscape. F. Upgrading the facade of the parking structure S. W. corner retail area is an urgent request. The TOV needs to do their part in upgrading Lionshead - "put your money where your mouth is", so to speak- Can we see a plan to accomplish this? G. Restricting tragic (especially lodge buses turning around) on E. Lionshead Cr. is desirable. 3. Negative positions for the Lodge at Lionshead: A. Memorandum from Community Development to PEC. requesting rezoning. 1. Lionshead Mixed Use District 1 (LMU-1) places Lodge at Lionshead in a zone with the bulk of Lionshead and out of our present residential zoning. In no way is this to our advantage - it's to our disadvantage as it exposes us to restrictions and new proposals that are negative. Criteria - "proposed zone districts shall be compatible with existing uses and accommodations potential future uses." LMU-1 violates this for the Lodge at Lionshead. "Increased Density is acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is preserved." LMU-1 violates this for the Lodge at Lionshead. Professi9fgy Managed by Peak Resort Services. Inc. 3s0 East Lionshead Circle Vail, GoIwWo 81667 (970) 476-2700 3-05-1999 5:35PM FROM LODGE AT LIONSHEAD 9704799536 P_3 2. General Use District Zone (new parking structure zone). Item 3.4: "Commercial growth should be concentrated in ezi~ •stin~e commercial areas TOV is creating a new Commercial area for offices, shops, etc. on E. Lionshead Cr. forever changing the character of our existing neighborhood. Item 4.1: "Future commercial development should continue to occur primarily in existing commercial areas - needs to be carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery." Parking structure proposal for retail , etc. violates this criteria. Negative for the Lodge at Lionshead. Our negative reactions boil. down to these: 1. We oppose being placed in LMU-1 because it will downgrade our neighborhood. We want our neighborhood as it is, or, enhanced. 2. We oppose the building of a structure against the South side of the parking structure, and, especially the inclusion of a new commercial area on E. Lionshead Cr. 3. We reserve opinion regarding the proposed recreational / art center until we are made aware of the specifics. We are inclined to be supportive to get rid of the East parking lot of the parking structure. We strongly urge you to consider these requests: 1. To be removed from LMU-1 and retain current zoning status. . 2. To have no commercial sites placed across the street from Lodge at Lionshead. Sin ely 7- Jim ' er, President Lodge at Lionshead Phase 11 Association 1 i 03/08/99 MON 01:50 FAX 9709499227 SHAMROCK Town Council Mem Q001 Comtnanzeatzon MEETING' WEDNESDAY,' MARCH 10, 1999 8:30AM COLORADO SKI MUSEUM j AGENDA • SUMMER CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE • SUMMER STREET PARTIES-we've set the dates but need help with the plans. • THE GUIDE-some changes but we're out there selling! i • THE FAESSLER PROPOSAL-what does the 10% mean? • THE TOV BUDGET-Steve Thompson will answer our questions. • HOUSING-an update on the push at the Mountain Bell site. • THE LODGING TAX-there may be more than one choice. • "UNDER 30"MEETING-let's pick a date and explore our options. • HOMEWORK-last month we passed out the RRC study titled "An Overview of Indicators Tracking a Changing Ski Business" as well as notes from the 12/11/98 Task Force Meeting_ The intent was to give you food for thought for this month's meeting. Please be prepared to discuss our role in the changing economic environment. Where do we want to go and how are we going to get there? Copies of these reports will be available at the meeting. Anyone wishing a copy in advance can stop by the Daily Grind. COME AT 8:15 FOR COFFEE AND PASTRIES SO WE CAN START AT 8:30 - WE HAVE A VERY FULL AGENDA. 03/08/99 RON 01:50 FAX 9709499227 SHAMROCK 444 Town Council Mem IM002 NOTES FROM FEBRUARY 17TH MEETING There is an open seat on the VVMA board. If you are interested please let one of the U oard members know. RRC ASSOCIATES: This Boulder based company did a study of Vail compared to other mountain resort communities. Some conclusions were that Vail Mountain is one of the best in the world but the perceived image of the town of Vail is that it looks old. Many feel that they are not getting what they are paying for. Vail is at a crossroads right now and this report should help with the direction the town takes. We ask that all of you look over the report that was handed out at the meeting and come with suggestions to the next i meeting. SALES TAX: Sales Tax figures are down and because of this budget cuts are coming. One of the programs that is in jeopardy is "Free After Three" so please support it. Also, keep updated with what other programs that may be effected by the budget cuts. GUIDE: This year the advertising costs will stay the same. We need input about what we need to change and what should stay the same. Most think different maps are needed. Other suggestions are blurbs about everyone's businesses, and writing an editorial so people want to pick it up. STREET PARTIES: The Town of Vail has given the VVMA money to put on street parties during the off season and summer. Where and when these parties will take place are still being discussed. Other events taking place will be looked at before any decisions are made. If you have any suggestions please let one of the board member know. A- VVI PROPOSALS: Waldir Prado attended the meeting and gave the VVMA on overview of the VVI Project. The project was approved by the Planning Commission and is now going to the Town Council. The proposal is asking for the zoning to get changed to build the new VVI, otherwise known as the Vail Plaza Hotel. In the new proposed Vail Plaza Hotel there will be underground parking, a health spa, 682 beds,1000 sq. feet retail space, and a much needed convention center. Mr. Prado stressed that he wants to clean up the look of Vail, therefore bringing more people to town, by building the new Vail Plaza Hotel. He asked for the support of the people at the meeting. He stressed that the opposition is being heard and now the people who support this project must speak up. If you have any question or would like to see a presentation about the project call the VVI and ask for Connie @ 476-5622, he would be happy to help you. The next work session that the Town Council will discuss this matter is scheduled for March 9`h. Bu -down In.. Vail opens Y door tBy Steve Lipsher minium, which in turn will be sold for Denver Post Staff Writer $140,000 to the winner of a lottery weight- "Buy high, sell low" might not be the.. ed by longevity. soundest financial advice, but in Vail, it's "For the 1999 budget, the town council considered a good investment in a valuable set aside $100,000 for this," Timm said. commodity: its people. "Our.goal is to buy five units, which pro- Town officials this week kicked :off a . vides a $20,000 subsidy for each unit." unique "buy-down" program, acquiring the To buy the property, town officials first of a string homes that will be sold at a scoured the local want ads and bid along- reduced price to longtime working-class side other potential buyers, ultimately residents. raiding the general fund temporarily to cash for the condo. "It's a good investment;": said Mayor paOn April 8, the town will host the lottery, Rob Ford. "It's less than the cost of new , which .favor§ applicants who have lived construction, and it helps to integrate our and worked in Vail the longest. The buyer deed-restricted housing throughout the community." . must meet maximum income qualifica- tions, on the heels of a controversial eons, must not own any other property in Eagle County and must secure financing. public-housing debate, the program is an ; _ talked to a couple. mortgage "I've attempt to keep the lights on in a town- lenders about what sort of income you where absentee owners control 72 percent ` . need to be making," ,Timm said. "With 5 of the homes and most workers are forced percent down.-.'. assuming no huge debt; a to' live in .less expensive,. dowa-valley couple each making about $12.50 an hour towns such as Edwards and Gypsum . in, theory would qualify for it." "The idea is to try to come up with as,. The town also would establish a deed re- many solutions to solving the affordable= sell- housing problem as possible," .said Nina ing ng ition for that more than prohibits the a original buyer cost from plus a Timm, the town's housing coordinator. it 3.percent annual appreciation. . So the town -paid $156,500 .for an -816- square-foot, two-bedroom East Vail condo- p.::. Please see HOUSING on 66 O~~Uut~ Post ~ ~ru.~~pA•~ , ,c~ b,1445 ~ -Y. ail `buy-down' program opens door to affordable housing -HOUSING from Page 1 B housing in Edwards. More controversial has been the he issue of affordable housing "Common Ground" plan, in which .has resonated so much that local the town has proposed building em- ' UpAs are offering breaks for first- ployee housing on 17 parcels of un. time buyers, such as a program by developed land. Several neighbor- 1%. tBank of Vail that limits clos. ing homeowner groups have filed - suit to block the project, which stir. "Being part of the community, red passionate debate before win- . we want to help these people," ring approval by the town council. said Ellen Morin, senior vice pres- "It's a huge issue for us," Timm . ident. "It's a small town. We want said. "We need people here year- to help our local, longtime custom- round. We need people grocery ers, and we want to give something Shopping during the off season: We back to the community." need lights on." Under the same guidelines, the Considered the first of its kind, town recently sold six units in the the buy-down effort is being under-construction Red Sandstone watched by Boulder and Aspen of- condominiums, is redeveloping a ficials intent on solving their af. town-owned $-frame into a duplex fprdable-housing problems. and is negotiating for control of 90 "This being a new program," '`obi'ts in the Berry Creek Fifth Timm said, "it's definitely going to apartments proposed for employee be a learning experience." ~ , , •.v.,• ~ e+,,~ P~~.~r'?r'.~.FR A~ a'Mgir'd'+1 •..e.n^.,+r ~ s Cdr r ~ " 0International Business/5J I)IiE ~ 0 Minding Your Business/6J ]VI N Calendar/8J ¦ Moneywlse19J o o > ' s o • Live stock quotes Stock tables111J smss www.denverpost.com- 4:10 { Sunday, March 7, 1999 SECTION J THE DENVER POV Ask what t. i pass. u down* Bud ou can do y for skttri Deals' effects on skier visits considered' ~a t,r w By Penny Parker leaders disagree whether the pro snow conditions early in winter. t ou can call the President a Denver Post Business writer motion has been good for the ski Alth lot of ough the three resort com things, but he's no " The "buddy pass" was billed as Downhill Bill." business - Winter Park officials parties won't discuss revenues, it's As wife Hillary and a boon for skiers and the industry say it was "absolutely good for clear that the early-season pass daughter Chelsea carved the slopes alike. the industry," while Vail Resorts sales gave them millions of dol- An estimated 100,000 Front Inc. is hinting at higher prices lars u fro i last week at Park City, Utah, hus- band and father William Jefferson Range skiers bought into the pas- next year. bly offset shortfalls in lift-ticket Clinton was more leisurely, When he ses - four-person season tickets Vail Chief Executive Officer sales when the snow was sloppy in wasn't home reading, he shopped for that sold for less than $200 per Adam Aron says the price for the November and December. books, posed for photos and snacked person at Winter Park Resort, passes this year was "very, very Winter Park is the most openly a on a peach yogurt. Copper Mountain Resort, and at a low." positive about the "buddy-pass ef- The sedate combination of Keystone, Breck- Vail sold 61,000 passes presea fect." The resort has seen a 9 per enridge and Arapahoe Basin. son for a gain of more than $12 cent decline in overall skiers so schedule afforded much needed Long lift lines and record traf- million, by far more than its com- far this year, said Paula Sheridan, s fie on Interstate 70 in January petitors. Regardless, the company vice down time for the president of marketing, but it and February suggest buddy-pass that owns Breckenridge, Key- could have been worse: Front S' reasonably owners have made the most of stone, Beaver Creek and Vail re healthy (he's got Range skier visits are up 7 per The Denver Post 11r4d ateirtord a bum kneel, rea- their investments, though some of sorts told analysts in January to cent. sonabl bumy active, that may be attributed to snow anticipate lower-than-expected "If you take the big global look, Skiers head back to Denver Feb.15 at the end of President'6 DBy~rr a conditions. revenues for the second quarter weekend. Record traffic traveled through the Eisenhower Tuuriel 52-year-old baby But Colorado's ski-industry and fiscal 1999 because of poor Please see BUDDY on 11J during January and February, according to slate officials, boomer. - bon' But for the U.S. Knox ski industry, it raises a big ques- tion: Are people like Bill Clinton the in- dustry s future, or its worst night- mare? A `stable' market Maybe they're both. In Colorado and elsewhere, it's a sad fact: People ski far less frequent- Fora still No. 1 ly as they age. Young adults remain, by far, the age group most likely to At least even if he didn't ski, Clin- hit the slopes. _ ton chose to visit a ski resort. As a result, the total U.S. skier ; With the exception of Gerald Ford, market is stuck between 50 million' skiing's presidential poster boy (the and 54 million skier visits a year - : -part-time Beaver Creek resident that's one skier skiing one day. "We ' started skiing in 1937 and only quit like to call it stable," says Stacy six or seven years ago), U.S. presi- Gardner, spokeswoman for the Na- dents haven't embraced skiing. tional Ski Areas Association. Nixon and Kennedy are known to But boomers who have kept skiing ' have skied as kids; Kennedy on fami- Hillary Clinton is an example - ly trips when he was 8 or 9, and Nix- have prevented the industry from ; on in his mid-teens on a friends trip gracelessly falling off a cliff. to Mount Baldy, Calif.. (He was photo- It's due to the generation's huge graphed falling.) size, says Brad Edmonson, former H Reagan skied, he never spoke of editor of American Demographics it, and there are no photographs, says magazine, now a consultant. : Jenny Sternaman, an archivist at his i "The baby-boom generation will `library. cancel out the tendency of an aging George Bush was known to sled at population to decrease the number of Camp David, where his wife broke r skiers," he wrote in an industry study her leg in a-mishap in '91. There's no recently. "As a result, the proportion evidence that Eisenhower, Johnson, of skiers who are aged 35 or older Truman or FDR ever skied, their li- should remain steady" until 2016:° braries said. Still, skiing and snow boarding re- That leaves Jimmy Carter as the mains the province of minority of I ' only actively skiing president. He Americans. "and Rosalyn ski every year at the The number hovers between 12 Carter.Center's annual fund-raiser, million and 14 million. It dropped - 'now in its seventh year, at Crested last year to 11.4 million, lowest in a Butte. decade. Are they skiing's future? No wonder the industry is doing The industry can only hope it. everything it can to enhance the total "winter sports" experience. Don Knox's column runs Sunday, "The boomers aren't necessarily at Tuesday and Thursday. His e-mail is the lifts at the crack of dawn, and dknox@denverpost.com. e they're not necessarily the last ones off," Gardner says. "They like to dine, they like to snowshoe. A lot like l to rest and read with a fireplace and ambiance." Edmonson writes, "Aching boom- ers in their 40s and 50s will need comfort after a jarring day on the slopes. Keeping them in the lodge means providing cushy seating, am- ple heat and-low-volume music." If they go to the lodge at all. While at Utah's Deer Valley ski ar- ea this past week, Clinton, today a nonskier (he had a skiing accident in 1984, the White House says) ventured only once from his digs - to stroll down Main Street. For the second straight year, the Clinton stayed at the vacation home of movie mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg, who didn't ac- ° comrony them. l /.,_Otpday, March 7, 1999 TH DENVER POST Budd pass effect on sk ier visi s wen e BUDDY from Page 1J fie through the Eisenhower Tunnel too f the ar away' to depend on Front County ski areas. mT agsolutely the buddy pass has been was "unprecedented," said Dan Range day skiers Loveland blame keting director Scott Fortner said heridan said. "It's been Hopkins, spokesmtan for the Colo- buddy pass in part for a decline in his resort has felt the force of the god," S ratio partm 40.: De p g d from the standpoint that we en of Trans orta overnight bookings. hid early on a lot of talk and inter- tion. competitors discount passes Traffic Kitty Boone' Aspen Skiing Co.'s est in skiin at a time when it was I r jum ed 11 ercent in Particularly in February. P p marketing vice president, blames herd to ge the Front Range to January over the same month last the decline in skiers on the dis- Thirty-percent loss even acknowledge there are moon t \ year, On the weekends, that in- counted season pass sales and ear- gins west of them." crease ballooned to 18 percent. The ly-season perceptions that there We lost 30 percent of peo~~~ ;Capper Mountain, meanwhile, is daily average was 2fi 433 cars „ who participated in our fro uehk orth! > was a lack of snow. I don't think 9 served but optimistic. Vice Pres- passing through the tunnel, com• skier card last seasong Fe 16~ there's any doubt that we've lost ee~' ent David Barry would say only i~ pared wit4 23,772 in January 1998. instate skiers," Boone said. thosesaid, "We're assuming we ItlSt i " Februar traffic counts rose 10.3 people to the buddy pass at buddy pass sales "had a post y Steamboat experienced such a I on t e impact" -pass equipment rental percent over the same month last loss of business this season that Fortner said Loveland official d ski and snowboar lessons. year, with the daily average sur• last month the company offered are starting to talk about ways to The hn Frew, biggest head critic of of the Colorado passes Ski is passing January's numbers at compete for Front Range skiers It 27,571, Hopkins said. While traffic buy-outs for employees to leave the the big three resort compani's company. Fr whea represents the 4 counts through the tunnel rise ev- Edward Callaway, president of elect to continue the buddyp s industry ras a e whole. ry year, these increases are sig- Crested Butte Mountain Resort, program next season. " uddy passes, he said, have not Hopkins nificantly higher than normal I've talked to a lot of e ' said. , said that poor early-season snow stn's aught ski new or lapsed skiers and who have been disgusted h hn along with the buddy pass kept busy it is at the buddy pass s areas," s ow boarders to the slopes. Were used to seeing 3 to 5 per- some Front Range skiers awa „ Instead, active skiers and snow- rneoenverPosiicienntanin cent increases through the tunnel y Fortner said. They say they're Loveland Ski Area is one of several reporting a decline in skiers due in v onuses during the winter,' from his resort. Last season, the overwhelmed by the amount' of Warders who might have bought a to buddy passes sold at other moonlss. Ho sins said. We think the (er front Range accounted for 13 per- people, the fact they had to parld so or reduced-price ble-digit) increases are from the cent of Crested Butte's skier visits. ' t scount sets at card retail outlets shifted to a airline industry consumers alwa s Still, record numbers of cars y pa-digit) sses. That number has slipped to 10 per- far out, the outlandish lines in t ' build a restaurants. I don't know if that b~ pass this year, he said. feel like they're not getting ir traveled through the Eisenhower people have been skiing a cent so far this season, he said. comes an opportunity for us," i' also give money's worth." g g the After We expect the buddy pass put a ason Resort officials agree that it e nsumers the false impression Tunnel during January and Febru- fair amount in January and Febru The deflated prices too soon to say whether they'd ar, ary, lift lines were crowded, and y will the demand decrease dent in our Colorado skier days," at a season of skiing really is Considering the crowds parking lots were full, so mewhat? Will they get their fix Callaway said. commit to this season's buddy pals I rth $200, Frew said. And some skiers are frustrated after they didn't get much snow in DO. a statewide basis through prices next season. Most say the:ih We do not want to become an- One issue everyone seems to by all that. November and December? We're ie 31, Colorado Ski Country re- watch sits and rev numbers - ~ , airline or beer in- agree on is that January and Feb- "These are the longest lift lines trying to analyze what's going to ported skier visits were down near- skier visits and revenues - beftlt+e o a er ely soft afraid drink, d try," Frew said. in am despe- ruaey have been exceptionally I've seen in 30 years," one Winter happen. March is typically the se 11 percent. A skier visit epre- settling next season's pass pric= we have busy months in the mountains - Park skier grumbled during the heaviest month." seers one lift ticket sold of given to ing strategies. I c mmoditized our industry, then though the role of the buddy pass is Martin Luther King birthday week- one skier or rider for all or art of y u have set a much lower level of unclear. The mountains received g that weekend, skiers Loss of business a day. The next set of skier visit We would like to retain buddy; parking pass holders as future customers of e pectation by the consuming pub- little snowfall before Christmas end. During Country will be our resortsa we Aron said, "ath were directed to lets in Ski resorts that didn't offer bud- renumbers leased Marc. 'It . Consumers have to feel they and pent-up demand may have Fraser - about five miles from dy-pass prices also are feeling the I'm sure th Most Front we will come up wlh I a getting value for their money, caused the crowds with or without the resort. effect. Steamboat, Aspen and holders have to driveeb buddy-pass ve land next year to creative p~hOSect people ski. offering we're a moving target like the the pass. In January, the increase in traf- Crested Butte -resorts that are ski resort to get to the Summit ing." ' 17 fi tt77917 .1'• 9'11;47 'Ountr e av p~ uu~ t c~T; s~~~r~(ii~.~.b ; ~ c C~ ~.ct;ci~: , ~~ff-, .:r, ~ • . , ' . ~ ' Dillon ,center . ~r.::?~. ,f a new trend in. the 'mountains a By Steve Lipsher Denver Post Staff Writer. f'+ J.11 DILLON In many ways, the J I+l Dillon Ridge shopping center in Summit County is a typical strip mall, with a grocery, liquor store, dry cleaner, a "big box" sporting- » - i l l goods store and soon a stadium- seating movie theater. But its location in the heart of ski country, where tourists tend to outnumber the locals, the center }lam represents a growing trend toward " suburbanization in Colorado's - - mountains, as well as a new direr-. ' f tion for commercial real estate. , • , The original developer wanted y ^ to do some residential develop- M s ment," says Julie Boyd, Dillon's 10 town manager, of the 38-acre par- 12 cet. "The town said we'd like to see at least 10 acres as commercial': 17I olf property, and when the developer. saw the potential for commercial to development, he came back with all 38." Boyd adds: "We're very pleased with the development." The shopping center set off a feud between Dillon and neighbor- 'The Denver Post 'I John [cpper!<o'ii P . g Sitverthorne when Y The Dillon Ridge shopping center in Summit Court-' A growing population and lifestyle changes ha'Y) in the Cit 3~1 ~ Markel moved less than a half mile ty brings citylike amenities to the mountain town. put a premium, on commercial .development' across town lines, shifting its tax ,;1 revenues in the process. But the Most of the push for commercial : do more than one, transaction a A.spen.,prices, but pretty:. muGnj new center, which opened last space in ski country stems from year. . what was expected, .according'..4?i ,i year, has been by all measures a dramatic population increases, es- As a result, demand for commer- local observers.,. ,1., a~iA, , ;il o,r rousing success and a sign of things pecially as more people begin to cial space in the towns of Carbon While,1he`'demographie' dori'0 to come. telecommute and baby. boomers dale, E1. Jebel,; Basalt•,and. _Glen-, support: majorne'w' developm>;if4 ? t' Sales-tax revenue has far ex- continue .to generate wealth in a wood Springs,: where. the bulk. of ' y ceeded expectations., Each new strong economy and with it a de- Aspen's workers .live, has increased Yet, Fleisher expert's `ski=country i 1 population`growth" from 'GrAA building is almost immediately sire for leisure. sharply. County`to the north-W Eagle.Cdf6MV filled upon completion. And locals ' "When you've ot.that man eo- "The rents in Basalt at one point,,,, IM say the entire project has delivered g Y p ty to'the west t'd' ultiitiately dride -like amenities to ski pie in one place, there's 'a demand got driven up•to close to, $30,a'; constructiori`df'new;'shdppigg 611t&1,11 cou611t&1,11 some Denver for retail, Wikstrom says. If you square foot,'.' Fleisher-says..: It got;. plexes'like I)ihl`o6'Ridge'iiti tvhat'rs?+i! Y. put all those people up . here, ahead of itself, and there was a' re-,•„ now undeve7opeilh'ahd:`i The development also has treat- they've got to have a place to buy " treat. Now, it's stabilized :in `ttte; -commercial .,;;;J ; 17 ; . +i.lsin ed something of a real ' and shop. But you sure can't create high teens." "I know a: lot ;of, people are;taJc-, f: estate ripple in the area. In Silver- the retail without the people." That's dramatically less than ing about doing stuff,"-he says:,`r 9'1r, thorne, the old shopping center has and Copper Moun been remodeled and an OfficeMax At tain, new Keystone rebuilt condominium recruited to fill the old City Market projects have given developers a space. In Dillon, the Town Center chance to add trendy specialty sp a mix of retail and restaurant shops on the ground floors, creat- Strip space malls has are gotten being a face-lift. built lt elselift.- ing a quaint village atmosphere. where, including Edwards. Only in fully built-out resorts' "We're seeing a tremendous lev- such as Aspen is the market grid- el of demand for our commercial locked, although the prices for space," says Jeff Wikstrom, proj-. commercial real estate continue to ect manager at the new Winter climb and so-called "down valley" Park base development for the developments have taken off. Hines Corp. "We've only got 28,000 "In .Aspen, we have very' little square feet, and we have mer- (land) available to purchase," says chants lined up seven deep in some local real-estate agent Don Fleish- spaces." er. "Most of our investors are very Among the tenants will be high- long-term. Some of them have been end ski shops, a dessert specialist property holders for more than a and other top-shelf retail shops, not. quarter of a century. . unlike the businesses that have "Part of my-business is to repre-. . moved into Summit County's Key- sent buyers wanting to come into stone, our market, but we probably don't . TO WNOF VAIL ~ ' ~ G ~ • Input/Inquiry Response Recd 1ne attached Ccrl._^..erts were and recently received by the Town of VaiL We ZesIGI" S $'~eSts to 9 TVe IZS SISCil 1IIFL1 T encour~~ V i CERN ADDRZ- ?raSc CON ' "S tazd we stove fordmey~onses. FL~~ Wli'rlV FIVE WO_RKIIWTG DAYS hjVIJ c FORM TO PA,-Vf BR~.~'~IDMEy~, ~irzs D i T O ^.a v-DLL- NQ Tam v' D, U L T Q My DA 0V RE= 7 ED Der /7, QT7-'7- y y y K 4 7 7 O L C. ( c:ce cafe) TOVUke~ 10 VL oQ~x-a-r~ e ~.~e o b c e~(SS Q ~p a, p W r :Otis Ca T^.a:at r-le ( date) - A Lai-y-17 T TN i Y• .yS aRr.:ti~ .~iy iretti.^r tad ~c~ c,~ii r-.:aia ert Ie ac ~~r ~,`V Carst - - -'='~'-ever.::tisires:iv:viil rtttnily~.atinas~•xC Assoaetast4itfart Cnsiesr_e c~op~ fiasthelf firamshammer Inc. RECEIVEO W 8 10 FAX: 970/476-8816 Telephone: 970/476-5626 Pepi Gramshammer 231 East Gore Creek Drive Sheika Gramshammer Vail, Colorado 81657 March 2, 1999 Mayor Robert E. Ford Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Rd. Vail. CO 81657 Dear Mayor Ford, 1 would like to first thank you for your prompt attention to my letter dated February 9. 1999. I understand your opinion concerning the excessive amount of trucks and semis this summer at Gasthof Gramshammer, but please understand mine. Without those vehicles coming and going we would never have been able to build our beautiful new addition with 1 I new rooms, a small conference room, a lovely spa and underground parking. In it's place there would still be a trashy parking lot and this would not have been very pr_csentable during the World Championships. l'ou stated in your letter that you thought that 15 minutes was a sufficient amount of time for our guests to unload. I disagree; our guests had to find the front desk, get registered, go back to their car to retrieve their luggage, come back into the hotel and get to their room, then back to their car to move it to the structure. In the midst of all of this our guests had to negotiate themselves and their luggage through a busy restaurant during lunch or dinner. Most of our guests are not young adults, they are mature adults ranging from 50 to 70 years of age. You know as well as I do that getting all of the above accomplished in 15 minutes, even with the help of our front desk staff, was near to impossible. Some of our guests may have needed just a bit more time. Also, you stated in your letter that it was observed by Police Chief Greg Morrison that a car was parked in our loading/unloading zone for over an hour after the previous day it was ticketed and I complained to the Town Manager. This was never brought to my attention. As for the issuing a ticket to the Austrian delegation dropping off their gold medalist, Hermann Maier, on February 2, I understand that they were advised that they were not allowed to park, but for publicity they wanted to drop him off at the entrance to the Austrian Haus and the Headquarters for Austrian TV, which happened to be on Pepi's porch. First, I would like to point out that you said in your letter that these people were clearly advised not to park in front of the porch area, however they could not speak English for the most part. Second, Austria TV was not located in our garage, but on the corner of our porch and I don't think that we received the publicity that was most desirable, but instead all of Austria got to witness the Vail police department at their finest - chasing a gold medal ski racer and his procession into town with their lights flashing to give his driver a parking ticket. Starting on May 15, Pepi and I will not allow any delivery trucks to park in front of Hotel Gasthof Gramshammer near the porch area as we will be serving our guests breakfast in the main dining room and on the porch with the weather permitting. Stating this, the Town of Vail will have to make other arrangements to find a new unloading zone. In my previous letter I had many other issues that you did not address in your response letter. I had problems with the street noise in the early morning and late at night. I hope that since this issue has not been resolved or even addressed that we will not have any problems with our entertainer. Rod Powell this summer as far as noise tickets being issued at 5PM. Rod Powell will play on our porch from 4PM to 9PM. One of my other problems is that for years our guests have been inconvenienced by all of the street entertainment around the Children's Fountain and the street parties that the Town sponsors, thus blocking the way to get to Gasthof Gramshammer. I would recommend that You use the new Slifer Circle for any further entertainment because in this location you will not blocking off all means to enter the Village. I would also like to let you know that we will oppose any street entertainment that is proposed around the Children's Fountain and that will interfere with any ~~uest access to Hotel Gasthof Gramshammer. I hope that we can solve these problems before the season is over and in a positive manner. As it is, I am still very unhappy with the situation between Hotel Gasthof Gramshammer and the Town of Vail. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Sheika Gramshammer Attachment xc: Vail Town Council Robert W. McLaurin T copy TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Mayor Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 February 25, 1999 Sheika Gramshammer Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc. 231 East Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Dear Sheika: Thank you for your letter of February 9"i. The 1999 World Alpine Ski Championships were a huge success, the Town of Vail looked very good and presented a very favorable image to the world. I believe that all the headaches of last summer's construction season paid off for us during the Championships and will continue to do so for years to come. The new wing of Gasthof Gramshammer is a welcome addition to the Village Core. As to your allegation that your guests were "harassed and ticketed" during the summer construction season, I have been advised that a special parking permit was developed by Police Chief Greg Morrison specifically for Gasthof Gramshammer guests which were used during the construction season. These parking permits, a copy of one is attached, were distributed at Check Pont Charlie to your guests. The permits clearly indicated, in both narrative and by pictured map, the location of your loading/unloading zone and the regulations regarding parking on Gore Creek Drive. This special permit was developed solely for Gasthof Gramshammer guests; no other business in the Town of Vail received such a customized permit. These permits were utilized to assist your guests with parking and to avoid any confusion caused by construction. The permits allowed 15 minutes to unload luggage which seems very reasonable. As there was only space for two cars in front of Gasthof Gramshammer at one time, it was imperative that the 15 minute limit be strictly enforced to ensure access for additional guests arriving or departing from your establishment. It is my understanding that even after these permits were being issued, several of your guests exceeded the allowable time for parking on Gore Creek Drive, in some cases for excessive periods of time. In one incident, one of your guests was ticketed for violating the 15 minute limit and you complained to Town Manager, Bob McLaurin. The very next day, the same car was observed by Police Chief Greg Morrison parking in your loading/unloading zone for over one hour. As to the issuing of a ticket late in the afternoon of February 2"d, 1 have been advised that the Code Enforcement Officer at Check Point Charlie clearly advised the occupants of the vehicle that they were not allowed to park on Gore Creek Drive; they could only park in your underground garage or on the ramp leading to it. Contrary to the instructions given, the driver immediately parked on Gore Creek Drive, resulting in the parking ticket. Please be aware that at the same time you are complaining of excessive enforcement, other merchants in the Village Core are complaining that illegally parked cars, trucks and vans, to say nothing of 18 wheel semis, were out of control and adversely impacted their , businesses. The businesses are demanding more parking enforcement from the police department As a result, the Code Enforcement Officers have appropriately been instructed to firmly enforce all loading and delivery policies. I appreciate your opinion and that you have taken the time to write me addressing your concerns. Be assured that while the Council demands exceptional customer service from our employees, we insist that the loading and delivery rules be strictly and fairly enforced. Sinc y, Robert E. Ford Mayor Attachment xc: Vail Town Council Robert W. McLaurin Greg Morrison TOJVNOF AIL 75 South Prontak oad>`;' 11 ~`ti . c.a Zn. , Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2200 Department of Police 15 MINUTE T' SPECIAL PARKING PERMIT PEPI' S GASTHOF GRAMSHAMMER FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING OF BAGGAGE DATE LICENSE PLATE VALID FOR 15 MINUTES STARTING TIME • THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING LUGGAGE IN FRONT OF PEPI'S GASTHOF GRAMSHAM.MER, DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO PEPI'S DECK, JUST EAST OF THE PLYWOOD CONSTRUCTION WALL, AS INDICATED ON THE NIAP BELOW NO PARKING IS ALLOWED ON BRIDGE STREET AT ANY TIME • ONLY POLICE EMPLOYEES ARE AUTHORIZED TO DIRECT YOU WHERE TO PARK, EMPLOYEES OF GASTHOF GRASHANINIER HA"v-E NO AUTHORITY TO AUTHORIZE PARKING • PLEASE DO NOT PARK ANYWHERE EXCEPT DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF PEPI'S AND PLEASE DO NOT EXCEEED 15 MINUTES. VIOLATORS WILL RECEIVE A S26 PARKING TICKET. ORE HOUSE GORSUCH GOLDEN BEAR NO PARKING BRIDGE STREET NO PARKING P A PEPI'S R GASTHOF K. GRAMSHAMMER RECYCLED PAPER A fasthnf mt FAX: 970/476-8816 firamshammer, Inc. Telephone: 970/476-5626 Pepi Gramshammer 231 East Gore Creek Drive Sheika Gramshammer Vail, Colorado 81657 Februarv 09, 1999 Dear Mayor Ford, With the World Championships coming to an end, I am finally finding the time to write to you. First of all, Pepi and I would like to thank you for speaking up in behalf of Gasthof Gramshammer and our new addition at the last town council meeting, we really appreciate your Support. There have been many times when Pepi and I ask ourselves why we change and improve, instead of enjoying our business the way it was. We choose to improve our home, which is what Gasthof Gramshammer and Vail have been to us since 1964. Gasthof Gramshammer and Vail have been our pride and joy for all these years. It was not an easy start for any of us, but we all worked very hard to achieve what we have created in making Vail what it is to ,-ay What Vail has become, seems to be changing before my very eyes, instead of the growing pains that affect any expanding community; it seems to me that we are now experiencing a different kind of pain - an "attitude pain." I understand that there has to be rules, but they are made for cruidelines and need to be flexible to the situation. This past summer was not an easy summer for any of the businesses that are located in the heart of Vail. With all the construction in town during the building of the Austrian Haus, Slifer Circle, Seibert Circle, the Transportation Center and, of course, Gasthof Gramshammer's new addition. It was a very frustrating several months for many of us. However, during the construction, we all had a common goal - to improve and become more beautiful in welcoming the World to Vail with the World Alpine Ski Championships. Pepi and I have spent thousands of dollars on flowers and improvements to beautify Gasthof Gramshammer and the streets of Vail Village. We would like to make a positive lasting impression on visitors because we want people to enjoy and love Vail as much as we have all these years. What upset Pepi and me the most during all this were the problems with Town of Vail employees; specifically, Mitch Imber at Checkpoint Charlie. Instead of our guests being welcomed and advised about the construction around town, they were harassed and ticketed while trying to figure out how and where they needed to go to check in. Mr. Imber insisted on Doing out of his way to leave his post at Checkpoint Charlie and came to Gasthof Gramshammer to write tickets to our guests that parked over the 10 minute maximum limit, which even involved the Vail Police Department. This harassment went so far, that many of our guests, before checking in insisted upon leaving Gasthof Gramshammer and moving to the Sonnenalp or even as far as Beaver Creek. I have confronted the police chief and the Town Manager, but it seems as if I am talking to a brick wall. When I approach anyone to discuss other problems. such as the street noise, the amplified sounds coming from night clubs, snow removal at 4:30AM and trash pick up at 6:OOAM, it seems that no one is willing to take action and nothing is being done about it. These kinds of problems cause complaints and non return guests. In the winter time it doesn't seem that there are is any assistance in controlling the street noise and one major complaint is that our Quests are only getting about 3 hours of sleep at night, if they are lucky. However, in the summer the officers are quickly at hand with their volume meter to measure the decibel level on our porch and give our entertainer a noise ticket at 5PM. This is another reason for not wanting to have entertainment on our porch this coming season. The street entertainers, with their singers and instrumentalists, are much louder than our entertainers. At your meeting you were also talking about the attitude of the employees that work for Vail Associates and the Mountain. We also have the same problems as you, and we believe that we should first start improving guest services when they arrive in Vail, by making them feel welcome and assisting in any problems they may have. I think that we are forgetting that we are a resort and our business is to make people feel welcome, enjoy themselves and return year after year. Another example of blatant rudeness on the part of the town was on February 2, 1999, when the Austrian ski team brought their gold medalist, Hermann Maier, to the front porch at Pepi's in an official car to celebrate his first win in the Super G. Mr. Maier's driver was followed into town with flashing lights and then received a parking ticket because he could not move the vehicle fast enough. The entire incident was caught on film and broadcast on Austrian TV. Is this really what we want to show to the world? The only way I can see guest services changing in the future is if the businesses and the town start working together in achieving a common goal. To accomplish this, the town is going to have to be more flexible in helping create the kind of atmosphere we all desire in the heart of Vail. As I said before, Vail is our home. We live above our business and we have contributed a lot of time, energy and money to this community. We never thought that there would be a point in time where we would consider getting out of this business, but all the stress and heartache makes living in Vail an unhealthy and sad experience. Thank you, Rob, for letting me take up your time and let you know what has been on my mind for the last 6 months. Best Regards, t s. EAST VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Officers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm Directors - Judith Berkowitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie Caullans - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorado 81658 Telephone: (970) 827-5680 Message/FAX: (970) 827-5856 FACSIMILE COVER PAGE I ~ To: Town of Vail/Town Council From: Time: 11:28:11 j Date: 3/9/99 Pages (including cover): ' 3 Subject: EVHA Memo to Town Council - 3/9/1999 RE: Mill Creek Circle, Hanson Ranch Road and Golden Peak Skier Drop Off Traffic Special Instructions: To: Anne Wright Will you please forward to the Town Council for their work session this afternoon. I will forward to others at TOV, etc. Thanks Jim. I !a EAST VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Officers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm Directors - Judith Berkowitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie Caulldns - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder To: Rob Ford and Town Council Members From: Jim Lamont, Executive Director Date: March 9, 1999 RE: Mill Creek Circle, Hanson Ranch Road and Golden Peak Skier Drop Off Traffic It is reported to the Association that illegal on street parking, for the most part due to skier drop off traffic, continues to be a problem on Mill Creek Circle and Hanson Ranch Road at the Christiania Lodge. The Association has reviewed the matter within the context of the purpose and function of the designated skier drop off parking area at the Golden Peak Ski Base. The large ski- er drop off parking area was designed and built at the Golden Peak Ski Base in order to consoli- date into one location the skier drop-off function for the site and that which was occurring in the surrounding neighborhoods. Illegal on street and skier drop off parking is the primary source of traffic congestion in the neighborhoods. These activities are noxious to the established residential character of these neighborhoods. It is requested that all effort be used to accomplish the following tasks: 1. Increased enforcement of illegal parking and skier drop off activity both on Mill Creek Circle and Hanson Ranch Road is warranted. 2. Improvements to regulatory signage be made in the following situations: a. There are insufficient "on street parking prohibited" signs on Mill Creek Circle. Ac- cording to neighborhood residence many parking signs around the circle have been removed. It is desired that these signs be replaced. Many of the existing signs cannot be viewed from both direc- tions of traffic flow. b. The "on street parking prohibited" and "skier drop off prohibited" signs at the entrance to Mill Creek Circle and Hanson Ranch Road are not readily apparent, excessively wordy, con- fusing or nonexistent. c. The "skier drop off prohibited" signs located on the west side of Mill Creek Circle, near the Vista Bahn, are inadequately sized, improperly placed and have incorrectly sized stanchions. d. On Hanson Ranch Road at the Chrisitiania Lodge the "skier drop off prohibited" and on street parking by permit only" signs are inadequate or nonexistent. e. Directional signs directing skiers to the "Golden Peak skier drop off' along the route from the Main Vail Roundabout, South Frontage Road, Blue Cow Chute and Vail Valley Drive are nonexistent. j f. Directional sign at the entrance to the "Golden Peak skier drop off' is inadequately sized and improperly placed. While some of the sought after solutions may take time to accomplish, there are others that can be effectuated immediately. It is requested that the Town Council initiate the necessary au- thorization to bring corrective action to bear upon these matters. The Association is available to work with all parties responsible for the resolution of these conditions. Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorado 81658 Telephone: (970) 827-5680 Message/FAX: (970) 827-5856 S- EVHA/TOV:M1lI Creek Circle, Hanson Ranch Road and Golden Peak Skier Drop Of Traffic cc: David Corbin, Vail Associates/Golden Peak Management Committee Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Greg Morrison, Chief of Police Greg Hall, Acting Director of Public Works and Transportation Interested Parties 2