Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-04-06Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1999 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot. be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. (5 mins.) 2. CONSENT AGENDA. (5 mins.) A. Approve the Minutes from the meetings of March 2 and 16, 1999. B. Proclamation No. 1, Series of 1999, re: Building Safety Week. 3. Appointment to Design Review Board. (5 mins) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Appoint two persons for the open positions on the Design Review Board. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: There are two open positions on the Design Review Board each with a term expiration date of March 31, 2001. 4. Appointments to Planning and Environmental Commission. (5 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Appoint three positions on the Planning and Environmental Commission. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: There are three open positions on the Planning and Environmental all with a term expiration dates of March 31,. 2001. 5. U.S. Forest Service Control Burn Update. (10 mins.) Dick Duran Bill Wood, USFS 6. Resolution No. 5, Series of 1999, A Resolution Adopting The Plan For Allison Ochs Arosa/Garmisch Annexation, An Area Within Three Miles Of The Town Of Russ Forrest Vail Boundary, Being 2.66 Acres More Fully Described As An Unplatted Portion Of The SE Y4, SE Y4, SE'/, SW Y4 Of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West. (10 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Adopt Resolution No. 5, Series of 1999, approving the plan for the Arosa/Garmisch area annexation. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail is applying for an annexation and zoning on property which was previously unzoned. This property is owned by the Town of Vail having been obtained pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement (LOAA) with the United States Forest Service. The Colorado Revised Statutes set forth the procedure for annexation. Section 31-12-105, Limitations, requires that the municipality shall have in place a plan for that area to be annexed, which generally describes a proposed location, character, and extent of streets, playgrounds, parks, .....grounds, open spaces, utilities and the proposed land uses for the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 5, Series of 1999. 7. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1999, first reading of an Ordinance Annexing Allison Ochs An Area Commonly Known As Arosa/Garmisch, And Setting Forth Details Russ Forrest In Regard Thereto. (30 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1999 on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail is applying for unilateral annexation and zoning on property which was previously unzoned. This property was obtained by the Town of Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement (LOAA) with the United States Forest Service. The Town of Vail is requesting annexation and zoning of outdoor recreation of this 2.66 acres, generally located on the North side of Arosa Drive, and abutting 2497 and 2487 Garmisch to the East and the Town Manager's house to the West. This annexation and rezoning further implements the Town of Vail LOAA and portions of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. This is one of a series of annexation/de-annexation and zoning procedures that the Town of Vail will be pursuing as a result of the land exchange with the United States Forest Service. This annexation and zoning recommendation is proceeding in conjunction with the Arosa/Garmisch employee housing planning process. This land has been identified as the site of the Arosa/Garmisch neighborhood park. The employee housing and park will be developed simultaneously, as part of the same development plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1999 on first reading. 8. Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1999, first reading of an Ordinance Amending Allison Ochs The Official Zoning Map For The Town Of Vail In Accordance With Title Russ Forrest 12, Zoning Regulations, Chapter 5, Zoning Map; Applying Zone District .Nina Timm Designation To A Portion Of Unzoned Property Previously Owned By The United States Forest Service And Transferred To The Town Of Vail Pursuant To The Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement And Annexed By Ordinance No. 7, Series Of 1999 To Outdoor Recreation (Or) District, Section 12-8b For Property Generally Located On The North Side Of Arosa Drive, And Abutting 2497 And 2487 Garmisch To The East And The Town Manager's House To The West More Fully Described As An Unplatted Portion Of The SE SE SE SW % Of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West (30 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1999 on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail is applying for unilateral annexation and zoning on property which was previously unzoned. This property was obtained by the Town of Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement (LOAA) with the United States Forest Service. The Town of Vail is requesting annexation and zoning of outdoor recreation of this 2.66 acres, generally located on the North side of Arosa Drive, and abutting 2497 and 2498 Garmisch to the East and the Town Manager's house to the West. This annexation and rezoning further implements the Town of Vail LOAA and portions of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. This is one of a series of annexation/deannexation and zoning procedures that the .Town of Vail will be pursuing as a result of the land exchange with the United States Forest Service. This annexation and zoning recommendation is proceeding in conjunction with the Arosa/Garmisch employee housing planning process. This land has been identified as the site of the Arosa/Garmisch neighborhood park. The employee housing and park will be developed simultaneously, as part of the same development plan. Y STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1999 for zoning making the specific findings set forth in the memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission from the Community Development Department dated March 22, 1999, on first reading. 9. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1999, first reading of an Ordinance rezoning Allison Ochs four tracts from primary/secondary to residential cluster located at 2497, Russ Forrest 2487, 2485 and-2477 Gramisch Drive, also known as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Nina Timm Block H, Vail Das Shone, Filing No. 2. (30 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1999 on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail is applying for rezoning on Town of Vail property which is currently zoned primary/secondary residential to residential cluster. This property is owned by the Town of Vail and is the site of the proposed Arosa/Garmisch employee housing and neighborhood park. The current plan is to construct a four-plex and duplex primarily on Lots 2, 3 and 4: A neighborhood park is planned for Lot 1 and the land to be annexed to the west. The proposed zone district is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, is consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and zoning regulations, and is appropriate for the area. The Town of Vail purchased these four lots in 1990 and at the time of purchase identified them to include a neighborhood park, open space, or employee housing. The 1994 Comprehensive Open Land Plan states that the land should be used for a public use, which includes employee housing. On January 26, 1999, Council approved a concept consisting of a four-plex and duplex on the east side of the lot, with a neighborhood park on the west side of the lots and on the land acquired in the land exchange with the United States Forest Service. Current zoning would allow 8 dwelling units. The purpose of this rezoning is to cluster 6 dwelling units to maximize the land available for a park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1999 on first reading. 10. Ordinance No. 3, Series Of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance Dominic Mauriello Amending Title 12, Zoning Regulations, By Adding Two New Zone Districts As Chapter 7H: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Chapter 71: Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District In Order To Implement The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; Amending Chapter 2, Definitions, Section 12-2-2: Definitions; Amending Chapter 4, Districts Established, Section 12-4-1: Designated, By Adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District; Amending Chapter 10, Off-Street Parking And Loading, Section 12-10-17: Leasing Of Parking Spaces; Amending Chapter 10, Off-Street Parking And Loading, Section 12-10- 16: Exempt Areas; Parking Fund Established; Amending Chapter 13, Employee Housing, Section 12-13-6: Type III Employee Housing Unit; Amending Chapter 13, Employee Housing, Section 12-13-7: Type IV Employee Housing Unit; Amending Chapter 14, Supplemental Regulations, Section 12-14-19: Satellite Dish Antennas; Amending Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, And Exclusions, Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements By Zone District; Amending Title 12 Sign Regulations, Chapter 4, Sign Categories, Section 11-4A-1: Signs Permitted In Zoning Districts; And Amending Title 5, Public Health And Safety, Chapter 1, Public Nuisances, Section 5-1-7: Noise Prohibited. (10 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 on second reading. 1 BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This is an ordinance creating new zone districts for the implementation of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The details of the proposal are contained in the February 22, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum and proposed Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999, which are included in the Town Council packet. The Planning and Environmental Commission, at its February 22, 1999 meeting, recommended approval (unanimously) of the proposed code amendments with minor modifications. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999, on second reading. 11. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance Dominic Mauriello Amending the Official Zoning Map For The Town Of Vail In Accordance With Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Chapter 5, Zoning Map; Rezoning Parcels Of Land In The Lionshead Area In Accordance With The Attached Map To Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District; And Rezoning Tract E And The Lionshead Parking Structure In Accordance With The Attached Map To General Use District. (10 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999 on second reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This is an ordinance rezoning areas of Lionshead to new zone districts Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 Districts in accordance with the map included in your packet and rezoning Tract E and the Lionshead parking structure from Parking District to General Use District. The details of the proposal are contained in the February 22, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum and proposed Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999, which are included in the Town Council packet. The Planning and Environmental Commission, at its February 22, 1999 meeting, recommended approval (unanimously) of the proposed rezonings. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999, on second reading. 12. Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance Jeff Hunt Amending Title 3, Chapter 4, Section 3-4-1 of the Municipal Code, to Remove Planning and Environmental Commission Representation on the Design Review Board. (5 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/Modify/Deny Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1999 on second reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The existing language of Chapter 4, Design Review Board, of the Municipal Code, states that "The design review board shall be composed of five (5) members. Four (4) members shall be residents of the Town, appointed by the Town Council, and the fifth member shall be a member of the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town." PEC members have stated that the amount of time necessary to attend both the PEC meetings and the DRB meetings was excessive and difficult for working professionals to attend. On February 23, 1999, the Town Council directed staff to present an ordinance that would remove the requirement that a PEC member serve on the DRB. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1999, on second reading. 13. Discussion of Main Vail Roundabout. (15 mins.) Mike Jewett i 14. Town Manager's Report. (5 mins.) 15. Adjournment -9:55 p.m. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/13/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/99, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. QIHGENDA.TC PUBLIC NOTICE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE (as of 4/2/99) APRIL, 1999 In an attempt to respond to scheduled meeting demands, as well as adhere to mandated ordinance and charter requirements, Council meetings are scheduled at the following times: EVENING MEETINGS Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each month, starting at 7:00 P.M. These meetings will provide a forum for citizen participation and public audience for conducting regular Council business. WORK SESSIONS Work sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues before the Council, will now be scheduled to begin at 2:00 P.M. (unless otherwise noted) on everv Tuesday afternoon. THE APRIL, 1999, VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE IS AS FOLLOWS: Tuesdav. Anri1 6. 1999 Work session............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Evening meeting......... 07:00 P.M. Tuesdav. April 13. 1999 Work session............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Tuesdav, April 20. 1999 Work session............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Evening meeting......... 07:00 P.M. Tuesdav, At)ri127. 1999 Work session............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) TOWN OF VAIL 0 Pamela A. Brandmeyer Assistant Town Manager Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP FToPlc QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS F _ I 1999 3123/99 EMPLOYEE HOUSING NINA/ANDY: When are we scheduling Council discussion to In discussing this item with Russ and Tom, it was decided to bring lottery RESTRICTIONS attend to the list of issues compiled re: upcoming lotteries, changes back to Council in July or August - after we've sold the East Vail Sybill Navas criteria, etc.? unit, but before we move forward with the lottery for the Arosa/Garmisch housing - and most likely before we have another buy down unit. 3/30/99 TELEPHONE CALL TO COUNCIL RUSS/TOM: What is that status of this? Russ: The last interaction with Betty was at Council when Gary Murrain FROM BETTY GUFFEY stated that he believed there was not a code issue but a maintenance issue and that they would like help from the Town to maintain the boiler in the Campisi residence. I received no further direction from Council. Tom: Ms. Guffy is continuing to complain to Town Council about matters she voluntarily dismissed in a civil law suite with her neighbors, Charles and Geraldine Campisi. It is the position of the Campisis that such statements are unsustainable and are slanderous. April 1, 1999, Page 1 Memorandum To: Vail Town Council From: George Ruther, Senior Planner Date: March 23rd, 1999 Re: DRB/PEC Interview Questions PEC 1. The Planning & Environmental Commission is charged with the responsibility of reviewing and making recommendations to the Vail Town Council relative to the Zoning Regulations. For example, the Planning & Environmental Commission may be asked to review a Special Development District proposal for compliance with the Zoning Regulations and make its recommendation on the proposal to the Town Council. With that in mind, what role do you see yourself playing in the decision-making and policy-making process of the Town of Vail? 2. As a Planning & Environmental Commission member you will often be asked to review and make a final determination on requests for variances from the development standards prescribed by the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. Recognizing that you may not always personally agree with the prescribed standards (i.e., setback, building height, etc), how would you approach a request for a variance from a development standard that you do not personally agree with, and what steps might you take to separate your personal interest from the interest of the community? 3. The Planning & Environmental Commission will be asked from time to time to review a land use policy proposal (a new zone district, an amendment to the current regulations, a proposed master plan, etc.) and make a recommendation on the policy to the Town Council. Understanding that you will be making a recommendation and not the final decision on the matter, what do you believe to be the three most critical issues facing the community with regard to land use planning? DRB 1. The Town of Vail has adopted design guidelines for most forms of development in the Town of Vail. What role do you see design guidelines playing in the continued development of the community and how would you explain to an applicant the importance of design guidelines? 2. In the design profession there is said to be an unwritten, professional courtesy to publicly critique another designers work only when asked. Recognizing that the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations require that most forms of development are subject to design review, how would you approach reviewing and critiquing the work of an architect or designer? 3. The Town of Vail Design Review Board has the difficult task of reviewing development in our community. While the town has adopted design guidelines to direct the nature of design and architecture in the community, what unique or exceptional skills do you possess that would be of benefit to the Board and the community to help insure the continued success of Vail? Mar-22-99 10:18A Colorado Speakers Bureau 970 476 0505 P.01 To: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk fax#479-2157 From: Claudia Dulude RE: DRB Position Date: March 22, 1999 Please consider my qualifications for a position on the Design Review. Board: 1) I am a Vail resident. 2) I can read, understand and work with architectural drawings. 3) I am knowledgeable of the building regulations in Vail. 4) I am not a builder or real czsl.ate broker and would be unbiased to developer agendas. Since C Claudia u ude 3916 Lupine Drive Vail, CO 81657 #476-8505 Mar-22-99 10:18A Colorado Speakers Bureau 970 476 0505 P.02 Claudia Dulude 3916 Lupine Drive Vail, CO 81657 970 / 476-8505 lei 970 / 476-0505 fax Objective: Senior management position in sales or business development where I can be measured and motivated to build a multi-million dollar business. Experience: 1995 to present Director of Education - Vail Valley Foundation Vail, Colorado Developed a Salon Series, a speakers series and executive management seminars for the Vail Valley Foundation. The VVF is the largest non-profit in Vail. The VVF sponsors the World Cup Ski Races, the summer ballet series, the Gerald Ford Amphitheater and other activities in the Vail Valley. 1989 to 1994 President and Founder - IdealDial Corp. Denver, Colorado IdealDial is a service bureau in the telecommunications industry providing voice. data and facsimile services for USA Today, Hearst Magazines. Coors, the Denver Nuggets, Easter Seals and dozens of other companies. I was personally responsible for: • raising venture capital from Aweida Ventures and Leasetec. • the design and development of the USA Today Money Hot Line working with USA Today editor Hal Ritter. • the development of information services and telephone promotions for Hearst Magazines including the Harper's Bazaar Horoscope Line, the Cosmopolitan Hunk Voting Line, and the Good Housekeeping Christmas Cruise Sweepstakes. - working with Coors Brewery on telephone promotions for marketing and providing services for the Consumer Information Center. Specific promotions included the Talking Cans promotion which won Coors and IdealDial an Addy Award in 1992, the Coors Light: Official Beer of the 1990s Quiz, the Coors Light NASCAR Hotline, the Coors Light Texas Music Hotline and the Pure Water 2000 campaign. • building the company to $6 million in sales and being AT&T's second largest customer in Colorado. • completing Direct Access DS3 Service with AT&T. Sold the company in 1994 to a larger telecommunications company. ~f 1984 to 1989 Professor - University of Colorado ! Boulder, Colorado Instructed graduating seniors and MBA students in Business Policy & Strategies,~Ethics. Business 101, Finance 305. Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management. 1982 to 1984 Assistant to the Chairman - Storage Technology Corporation Louisville, Colorado Assisted Jesse Aweida with Project Finance and Financial Analysis. Negotiated $20 million purchase agree ment with Nixdorf Computer, initiated strategic relationship with AT&T, acted as Controller of CPU partnership, and an Auditor of the Tape Division. 1976 to 1980 Consultant Boston, Massachusetts Clients included AT&T, Peoples Express, and Prime Computers. Assisted in the developments of AT&T's Strategic Marketing Plan to compete in global and electronic markets. Involved with the initial Peoples Express Business Plan. Personal: 1976 BA, Simmons College, Major: Economics, Minor: Library Science 1982 MBA, Harvard Business School Two children Enthusiastic tennis player, skier and golfer March 28, 1999 Ms. Lorelei Donaldson Town Clerk 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Ms. Donaldson: I am interested in serving on the Vail Design Review Board. I have lived in Vail since 1993 and have been a property owner since 1995. Please see my attached resume listing my relevant work experience. My professional career being design based gives me a strong understanding for many of the issues and projects that are presented to the Design Review Board. I am knowledgeable about the review process from the presenting view point having been through the Vail design review process as well as other communities to present projects that I have worked on during my prior work experiences. I am very interested in being more involved with the Vail community to help shape the future. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you and please feel free to contact me at 904.1234. Sincerely, i iMelissa Greenauer Melissa Greenauer P.O. Box 5963, Vail, CO 81658 (970),476-3572 Exoerience Greenauer Desian Grow - Vail and Denver. CO May 1998 = Present Owner • Specializing in Interiors and Landscape design for residential and commercial projects. Current Projects: • Greenauer Design Group is working collaboratively with a local architecture firm on the interior architecture and fixed finishes for a Bachelor Gulch single family residence. As well as the responsibilities of the interiors contract through Greenauer Design Group. The project is to be completed February of 2000. • Developing a space plan and furniture layout along with the color scheme, the selection of the fix finishes and furniture for a new office space in the Edwards Riverwalk First & Main building. The project is to be completed August of 1999. • The Denver office: The current project is a remodel of a high end residence in the Cherry Creek area of Denver. The scope of services include: the selection of floor materials, wall colors and details, fabrics, furniture, window coverings and accessories. The project is to be completed June of 1999. Slifer Desians - Vail. CO Aug 1996'- May 1998 Project Designer / Project Manager / Intern Architect • Implement and delegate tasks to complete design projects and remodels. • Establish schedules and goal planning to move Slifer Designs into new corporate headquarters in Edwards. CO. • Develop specifications and fixed finish packages for large high end resort developments in Beaver Creek, CO and Bachelor Gulch Village,- CO. • Project leader representing Slifer Designs and maintaining correspondence, budgets, and presentation of product materials for resort development sales. • Scope of responsibilities include: drafting remodels for design development to construction documents, interior architecture and detailing, construction administration, client liaison from architecture to interior design, interior and kitchen design including home furnishings. Gwathmev Pratt Architects. P.C. - Vail. CO Feb 1994 - Aug 1996 Intern Architect , • Proficiency in computer drafting, project organization, and presentation drawings. • Work directly with principal: take design sketches into computer working drawings, prepare rendered drawings for client presentations, and execute project administration. • Assist in the production of design development and construction drawings for multi-unit residential and commercial projects. • Emphasis in single family home design - from conceptual drawings through final construction administration. Land Designs by Ellison. Inc: - Vail. CO April 1993 - Oct 1993 Landscape Architect • Responsible for all aspects of design for high end residential and resort/commercial landscape plans in the Vail Valley. • Develop and prepare master plans, planting plans, with emphasis on the selection of native plant material, layout plans, construction details, and preliminary costs estimates. • Specialty designs including the use of fountains, river rock swales, boulder spas and natural boulder retaining walls for a functional landscape within the terrain of the Rocky Mountain Region. Peter J. Smith & ComDanV. Inc. - Buffalo. NY/Niagara Falls. Ontario May 1992 - April 1993 Landscape Architectural Technician • Assist designers and planners on a variety of projects throughout the United States and Canada. Responsible for researching native plant materials, developed planting plans and material lists for projects in California, New York, and Ontario. • Assist principal with layout and design of master plans. Complete working drawings, construction details and rendered master plans and sketches for final presentation panels on several projects including an elementary school in Buffalo and a cemetery in San Francisco and Sacramento, CA. Education Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture - West Virginia University May 1992 Program Accreditation by American Society of Landscape Architects Minor in Spanish University of Guanajuanto - Guanajuanto, Mexico June -July 1990 Study of Spanish language, culture and history. Professional Develooment AutoCAD v.14, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Project, Excel (Windows 95), DataCAD v.7, Norton Desktop.. Professional Associations Association for Project Managers, Society of Landscape Architects, American Society of Interior Designers allied member. 9 SUMMER B.J. HOLM 970-476-7866 1858-WEST GORE CREEK DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Attention-LORELEI DONALDSON, TOWN CLERK VAIL TOWN COUNCIL: I would to serve on the Design review Board for the-TOWN- OF VAIL.I like the team concept and can make ideas work. I have the ability to work well with others. Education- BA in Education-The University of Minn. Degree in Interior Designer-Landscape VOLUNTEER WORK: TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY HOST for two years and at the present time on saturdays. -COUNTY ELECTION JUDGE-for VAIL -BRAVOAND THE BALLET,1999 WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS VIP AMBASSADOR, BIRDS OF PREY-SECURITY, JERRY FORD INVITIONAL firt and last event. OCTOBER FEST, SNOWSHOE SHUFFLE every year,-I volunteer for just about every race that takes place in Vail. Girl Scout and Brownie Leader, neighborhood Ambassador, Cherry Creek Sneak, Bolder Boulder, Symphony Debs Leader, U.S.A. Swimming Official. Youth SoccerCoach. Also a member of the Vail Valley Medical Auxillary. WE CAME TO Vail, 30 years ago. My husband was hired to be one of the Doctors here in Vail. We bought a house 29 years ago. We lived in Vail off and on. However, five years ago we decided to make Vail our permanent Home. So a new carpet and a lot of paint did wonders. Welove the beautiful Winters and the great Summers. We have three wonderful children, Courtney born in Vail, now in Law School. Bill who is a Radio Personality-KZYR in Vail, & just purchased his own place in Vail. Daughter Winter, a Realtor and Mortgage-Loan-Title Officer, No Place like Vail. 1'.,/ 03/04/99 21:08 FAX 9704764901 FPS ARCHITECTS Qo2 March 4, 1999 F R I TZ L E N PIERCE SM I T H Vail Town Council c/o Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 RE: Continued Service on Design Review Board A R C H I T E (.T S Dear Council Members, I appreciate the opportunity to have served on the Town's Design Review Board for the latt two years. I believe there have been a number of significant efforts that have been completed during this period, most notably the adoption of the Lionshead Master Plan, including new Architectural Design Guidelines that will provide a great opportunity for aesthetic renewal of the area- l would like to express my sincere interest in continuing my service to the Town by seeking reappointment to the Design Review Board. I have a good understanding of the Regulations and of the method by which those Regulations are applied- I am a licensed Architect ( since 1976), a former 'Down of Vail planner and Chief Building Official, and a former member of the town of Avon Planning Commission. My professional experience with Architectural Design Guidelines in a number of Jurisdiction will Provide insight into alternate means of implementing aesthetic compatibility within our community. I am a Vail citizen and property owner and have been so for the majority of my 25 year tenure in the upper Eagle Valley_ Although l am relocating my residence, the new residence is within the Town boundaries in East Vail. Thank you again for the opportunity to continue my community service. iam Pie via fax 479 2157 cc Russell Forrest C :1MyTilesWrbappo intwpd Planning a Architecture • Interiors 1 650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 a Vail, CO 01657 a fps®colorado.net • fax (970) 476-4901 9 (970) 476-6342 Memorandum To: Vail Town Council From: George Ruther, Senior Planner Date: March 23`d, 1999 Re: DRB/PEC Interview Questions PEC 1. The Planning & Environmental Commission is charged with the responsibility of reviewing and making recommendations to the Vail Town Council relative to the Zoning Regulations. For example, the Planning & Environmental Commission may be asked to review a Special Development District proposal for compliance with the Zoning Regulations and make its recommendation on the proposal to the Town Council. With that in mind, what role do you see yourself playing in the decision-making and policy-making process of the Town of Vail? 2. As a Planning & Environmental Commission member you will often be asked to review and make a final determination on requests for variances from the development standards prescribed by the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations. Recognizing that you may not always personally agree with the prescribed standards (i.e., setback, building height, etc), how would you approach a request for a variance from a development standard that you do not personally agree with, and what steps might you take to separate your personal interest from the interest of the community? 3. The Planning & Environmental Commission will be asked from time to time to review a land use policy proposal (a new zone district, an amendment to the current regulations, a proposed master plan, etc.) and make a recommendation on the policy to the Town Council. Understanding that you will be making a recommendation and not the final decision on the matter, what do you believe to be the three most critical issues facing the community with regard to land use planning? DRB 1. The Town of Vail has adopted design guidelines for most forms of development in the Town of Vail. What role do you see design guidelines playing in the continued development of the community and how would you explain to an applicant the importance of design guidelines? 2. In the design profession there is said to be an unwritten, professional courtesy to publicly critique another designers work only when asked. Recognizing that the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations require that most forms of development are subject to design review, how would you approach reviewing and critiquing the work of an architect or designer? 3. The Town of Vail Design Review Board has the difficult task of reviewing development in our community. While the town has adopted design guidelines to direct the nature of design and architecture in the community, what unique or exceptional skills do you possess that would be of benefit to the Board and the community to help insure the continued success of Vail? March 30, 1999 Town of Vail Council members: 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Co. 81657 Citizens: I am applying for one of the open positions on the P.E.C. board. I have been a resident of the Town of Vail since September of 1974 and have always been interested in the "smart growth " of our town. Since our son is successfully settled in the U.S. Marine Corps, I feel that I can now dedicate myself more to the needs of our community. Even though I have not always agreed with the decisions of the Town of Vail Council, I believe that I can be a constructive force to help improve our community as we enter the new millennium. Sincerely: Chas Bernhardt 2695 South Frontage Road Vail, Co. 871567 Telephone 970-476-4712 Fax 970-476-7651 e-mail chasb@mountainmax.net 2695 South Frontage Phone (970)-476-4712 Vail, Co. 81657 Fax (970)-7651 e-mail: chasb@mountainmax.net Gales G. Bciathardt - Objective Application for position on the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission Experience 19980 - present Better Home Improvers, Vail, Co. owner ? Part time, now full time. ? Design, remodel, cabinetry, construction, management ? Custom interiors to project management 1983=1986 The Cheney Co., Vail, Co. Carpenter, foreman ? Built several custom homes in Eagel-Vail and Wildwood. ? Forman on large Vail Golf Course home addition. 1979-1983 Jim Reineke Const. Co., Vail, Co. Carpenter ? Timber Falls condominium project. ? Several East Vail custom homes. ? Remodels on homes and commercial spaces. 1976-1979 Ore House Restaurant, Vail, Co. Cook ? Steak broiler Education 1974-1976 Rider University, Lawrenceville, N.J. ? B.A. pre-med biology ? Graduated as one of 13 to complete the program which 365 had begun as freshmen 1972-1974 Somerset College, Somerset, N.J. ? Studied Organic and Statistical Sciences 1969-1972 Union College, Cranford, N.J. ? Studied liberal arts curriculum with science emphasis Interests Outdoor recreation, martial arts, public service. ? Avid hiker, hunter, fisherman, skier, snowboarder ? Studied Shotokan Karate and Akido Jujitsu ? 5 years coaching T-ball and little league ? 5 years teaching youth and jr. high Sunday School Awards 1964 -Eagle Scout, B.S.A. Troop 32 Watchung, N.J. Received 1969 - Excellence in Reseach, American Dental Association for research of laser use in dentistry. [Doug Cabiln 2855 Snowberry Drive Vail, Colorado 81658 March 29, 1999 Ms. Lorelei Donaldson Town Clerk 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Ms. Donaldson: Please accept this letter of application for a position on the Planning and Environmental Commission. I am very interested in devoting my time toward the success of the Vail Valley- I came to Vail in 1978, fell in love with the valley and remained permanently. I presently live in the Intermountain area in the third residence that we have owned in Vail. I am currently employed by Vail Associates and have worked for a large construction company here in the valley. Vail is our home and I would like to work towards shaping it's future. My interest as a member of the PEC is to be involved in the future of the community and its direction. We have witnessed several development projects in which structures are being built to the maximum tolerances of the code. We need to use good judgment and common sense when reviewing such projects. We need to look at individual situations with new insight as building continues on some of the more difficult remaining lots and redevelopment of existing structures. The Vail Valley has an ambiance that is attractive to all who live and visit. Our founders had great visions of a warm alpine Village that needs to be remembered. I believe this is all possible with the guidance of the PEC. All the natural aspects that this valley has to offer are very precious, and what is man made must be developed in harmony with nature. This can be a very difficult job to balance. The town has made great strides with listening to the community in preserving open space and the quality of our environment. Continuing this role will be beneficial to our community- I would be honored to serve on the Planning and Environmental Commission. Sincerely, 1 r Doug Cahill Mar 31 99 02:01p J.T. Hall (970) 479-0192 p.2 James Terry Hall, Jr. 3002 South Frontage Rd. W. Vail, CO 81657-4153 Home Phone (970) 479-0192 Fax (970) 47&0192 Email jthalljr@vail.net March 31, 1999 Town of Vail; Town Clerks Office Attn: Vail Town Council 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Lorelei Donaldson, I am interested in filling one of the open seats on the Planning and Environmental Commission for the Town of Vail. Having lived in Vail now for ten months and looking forward to making it my home for years to come I am interested in contributing to the town and being part of its adjustment as a growing mountain community. I grew up on the front range of Colorado and attended the University of Colorado in Boulder where I received a Bachelors of Arts degree in history. Growing up 1 hiked and camped throughout the mountains and skied at all of the Colorado ski resorts. I have seen the difference planning versus not planning can have on the communities and cities we live in. For six years after graduating from CU I was an officer in the United States Navy Mere I lived in and visited just about every region of the United States. This experience further convinced me of the importance of planning a community's growth and ensuring that the environment that attracts businesses and residents to the community is not only maintained but enhanced as the community grows. So many towns have been overwhelmed by uncontrolled growth that the good factors which caused the growth can eventually become the very factors which cause the town to falter. After being honorable discharged as a lieutenant last May I returned to Colorado to attend a culinary university in Vail, pursue a career in the restaurant industry and to live in the mountains. This decision to live in the mountains was purposefully to take advantage of the lifestyle that the mountain environment and ecology offer as well as the sense of community that the mountain towns still have. In order to maintain these elements it requires community participation and well thought out decisions on the aspects of growth that effect everyone living in the community. The use of citizen commissions to assist town officials in making these decisions is a positive way to achieve the type of solutions we want for our growth concerns and issues, and is the way I would choose to participate in the community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, James Terry Hall, Jr. ' 03-18-1999 03:01PN CANAC OF VAIL/ ASPEN INC 970 926 9033 P.02 1459N Greenhill Ct. Vail, Co. 81657 March 17, 1999 Town Of Vail P & EC Dept Community Development 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Co. 81657 Attention Vail Town Council Re: Position on Planning Commission Dear Sirs: This correspondence is to express my desire to serve on the Town of Vail Planning Commission. I am a full time resident of Vail and have been for the past 9 years. I own a business in the Valley and I am a retired AT&T Executive. I feel I have a great deal to offer to this organization with over 27 years in Corporate life with positions in Planning, Line management, Budget and Project management. I have extensive experience in the building industry and knowledge of creative financing that is required in this valley's economy. I am especially concerned with the resolution of the Housing crisis and believe that 1 can be objective and lend some creative ideas to this task. I have a deep appreciation of what Vail means to the many people who live here and even though my business is very time consuming I believe that I am the type of person that can contribute in this position. Please feel free to contact my at my home 476-6033 or my office 926-6033 if you have any questions or concerns. I have attached a copy of my resume to aid in your decision process. Sincerely, I Paul Hymers 03-18-1999 03:01PN CANAC OF VAIL/ ASPEN INC 970 926 9033 P.03 1 Pau! Hymens 1459N Greenhill CL Vail, Co. 81867 Home 070 470 0093. 07iroe 07016 0033 PUMMARY: Executive prt lrify WI In teiac:ommunications. finance and condnjcbon. Strong beck4round In ettglnaaring ffrtencial development, planning. P&L and project rnenagemant. Demonstrated of developing and implementing eoiutlons to muttl-dlmenslonal complex operational problems, row rd 1 .80 Uk9 MANA(3EMgNj IIN,C. AND CAN8"F VAiWASPLN INC, To P PM~ridenSfTfsasta~er Orerllted these companies to itlartcet, design and distribute kitchens and bathe in a rdctta markwL o Edwards, Colorado covering gagis, summit, Garfield and PWri counties. Overall raaponslbffkl as' gelation, tOnancisl and prOJaot management. Employing design professlohals. an lnsttitlatiows manager and several suboontraa Installers. Expertise In technical prooese consurdna, building des n rarqulremonts and Building Cod" Ill Vail, Avon and Edwards. IDoaaitww. 1090 to low Originated. designed and developed two lwavy rasidences in Vail, Colorado after aft r m AT&T Ng0east. 1118Z ?a M Various wcecutlve positions hw wlthfn we lime Rams. fteci,Itive 1=inanolal Mensaw: Corlawa +e. Responsible for developing a oonsolidabd innovative NrRancial reporting system for 5200 million budget, Performed proftbillty anetyws within AUT, and noel ate~ In the strategic plan for the oorponrre reorganization, reporting dlm4*y to the Corporate W" F~rftjdant s Mwdma*d prop blitty and in., cd producti; of cuMo personal while reducing ovwWI expense by 3096. s Restructured mWbmtion and tactioal ,r itNlCy commensurate with newly level dtegic 90912 and obJadivee of dlveetlwre, II • Managed bulaMe sheet to enhance return, revised salary and bongs program. Achieved volume and proM 900s of 120%. e Formulated Accurate sales and profit trend report to assist corporete's evaluation of dal progress toward budgeted ob} , d,' . rxVCw" UMv"eat Dipltd 8"~rioa Northeast 1287 to 1068. Initiated Quality, Gott and schedule of an S1a mKon Project. Established end man*qW 4~ d hired adminlstrativa personnel to support the Univaraal plgftat Service Projed_ rev teak tome Irnplernwded nationwide oonverglon plans and procedures for all AT&T s " and digftal.~ $erlAces 1Yom analog to a Facllltatod main frame and personal oomputer manag which resulted In In systems and doubled the eQikdanoy of the present resources. ~ Execufve Mansgm: Non-Co A, rng Gncults. 1995 to 1067 a Responsitgo for Identffrcapon and relocation of private ofrcu ta. a 17-.I aatunturod conformance of the U. S. Congressional ConSOM Doom of 1983. Th prajad was two years behind eCWUie with a significant cost overrun. $uacmful Qom late the profaat within the legal tirnefrome and reduce the w"ndlture by 4016. Manger Staff, Northeast 1078 to 1991 0"W- Designed and Developed Microwave, communication system for NASA early space flightg. Business C . Mntr Erscblolen 7 is : ; S rAF 4=F. ra~.~ : ~:.x fnn _ QT a~-nom-s ~ua,~AU nnram-nn c:nr i - as i r rq TOTAL P.03 7S -3 .~,,qs fR o~ t~ E S T Cd ~i~ / .t3~ r F 7-2) OvIZ ~oc,J-~-S f u vil ter`7~ - ©t2c, x) d- r e' 2-2-21-5-9 ~ s~k i/e-d cJ6~~ I>f " ~41 7L -L/2GJ J XC MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Patrick Hamel, Environmental Health Specialist DATE: April 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Town of Vail Community Clean Up Day The event will be held on May 15`'' from 8:00am until 2:00pm. Registration will be at Golden Peak and lunch will be at Bella Riva. 8,mk 4. d ooPut The total budget for the program is $6,910.00. Donations of $20.00 will be given to the first 200 person's charity of choice. The bar-b-que following the clean up will be outside Bella Riva on their patio. If it should rain we will move the lunch indoors. We will promote this event as a Vail Community event. Residents will be invited to join their neighbors in cleaning up their neighborhoods and then enjoying a wonderful barb- que provided by local restaurants. There will be a sign up table at the event for the adopt a trail/area clean up program in the Town of Vail. Susie Hervert is in charge of this program. Pagc 2 - Surnmlt Dally News Thursdav March 25, 1999 17 V1," "It ff'' y - ® I A v = r, n •c~ n vu.. M O W O lose b'~ ~s~ d v pr 0 Z; free kill Let 1 e o v J o ~l L _ its with No M. % C7 u oil v c V. 'a ~ v c,; ~ rooted i n c O C a o, O . .C Call Jul G, 0 Ij 'G co C 1:11, )Pt. tl vb~Gb_ I them use V, U rti N O L (v 1 I ® Officials say :1111! b 2i. , G 1 1 «1 u v v v o N cd 03 bQ oti~~~ LN damage is ,,yEoI _ 110 a o fidin not significant 40W . C, E 'D G `U c ~j v cy 9 sY:y; 'ty1 o z G. c-1: E E ° ° o G I. B Jane Reuter m rN - ~ c CG c b c' v M 1 Day News Staff Writer -1 (h7,n,LL,31 J1u G V, E q; E ,,oI.-sf„. .c.~ r. i_: a o c; f > i ° v oil lug SUMMIT COUNTY 't' a - ires su,,il Wd I O I c v s v N Dante 11110119 locals highways are dying conwN of m, a) c`~ .C .C 'n u O u p w 1111If.e front the effects of mall sail and mag- cent of II ~e uc E 1~ E 'D f^ -p '3 ~ L v c a aj i- O cC G I nesitini clllorl(le, b(It it Slate fOI'e5lel' 4,Lx:ul uunp aJ - G c O G G D 7 C Ilalye,. . .+11ill 1klavN L o e c, oo -K-- 0 E o Says Ilse percentage of (laluagecl trees ALL SERV N is insignificant. And the alternatives I •cs y c a c., 'f v r , , 3859 such pro(lucls, he addc(I, :uc Pub6}Del.... C) oo .D n~ I c o Gq N m 'oFliher to not using goo(I. Gencsral Mc Q, V' R. O I N j b .a~. O E Bennett Edilol ,T u o Q, co ' Barton No one likes to sec the red lives, oo) ` r_ D ' c' ti o o c) E + hilt no one likes to go skating on I- 0 U 70, either," sai(I John (;ricvc, slate c o E rlisu icl forester. "County Roa(I and E _ ISIIUg'C i111U 1 I 1_lif v.. i:f1ked this over n A~ f-. GU L q~ O y ci a. ° m ° v v quite a bit over the past several cars, f L = E o,'x v 'E.+ c vE Z.) ~d~ pi y t p d _ ^ „ and il's just it difficult choice Thal has k o p c c= n I V a a. ti F N to he Ina(le. :3 p n e c oi) ) "Within 10 10 20 feet of life right ct Q n ~i E J U ° o o 10 of way, you have a fairly high per- o U E c .i x If ventage lot' impacted trees)," he l L a(IJc(I. "13111 the percentage forest- ( wi(le is u) small it's alnlosl nut r,ll- SununilDaily/Mall Fo Trees along the Dam Road are dying (the red tree shown here) culable. It's also nut sonlctlting I1l,1l's in1o s,l(ul.'I'he int)lu is from de-icing chemicals used on 1-70 and the Dam Road. t-Dg I I i going l0 he limile(I to trees right along the e Bridge dep`ltntent, which ntainlaills Inab I Chloride.- highway." the Dan1 IZOild, isn'I CVCl1 using stag A study recently conducted by the. To blame the problem on nlagne- chloride there this year, Said dil'Cet01' ' Colorado Department of Transpurta- sium Chloride isn't accurate, said John Polhentus• tion supports 111,11 Contention. Grieve. ".It's from road sand and salt," he "It showe(I there is sonic effect The Summit County 12uad an(I said. " I'he salt is more corrosive than Please see Dead trees 11{1t'c 7 44 11 • G • 4 Ski v111ages f follow design... Of Old olod ges . Resorts adopt. `new urbanism'. t By J. Sebastian Sinisl Denver Post Staff Writer ASPEN - «F Forty years ago, urban planner * « i and author Jane Jacobs began call- HIGHLANDS ing for neighborhoods and streets that were more people-friendly, Park. "That makes the pedestrian with street-level retail and enter- important and counteracts the feeling of bigness." Ids,Mi MINE tainment activity as alternatives Villa at As Highlands and c Yt y to high-rise glass downtowns and ges Pen sterile suburbs. Winter Park are under construe- Nobody listened. tion. All three will echo the design But in the 1990s, Jacobs' vision lines of classic western national of. more a human place - where park lodges - at Yellowstone, Yo- r~~ pedestrians are more Important semlte, the Grand Canyon and else- STR 11111 where -the best of which were than auto traffic and where coin- PE munity parks replace private gar- built before 1920. n` w dens - took hold in many Ameri- A variation on the pedestrian- fLj -W T x can locales under the loose tag line scale theme is proposed for the of "new urbanism." base of Copper Mountain. At ILI a As the decade comes to a close, dge, a proposal with 850 hour v destrian-scaled and new urban- hig units is mired in contro er- Y ism-inspired "villages" are sy. But It does contain the outdoor t at Colorado ski resorts plazas and gathering places of an sprouting a tYS such as Keystone, Winter Park and area designed with foot traffic in Aspen Highlands. mind. f r 4f Keystone's River Run village Aspen Highlands is building 'a eventually will:habe five different $250 million resort complex, with x5 F ri O i "neighborhoods" built by a part- home sites priced at $1.5 million nershi of Vail Associates and ski and =2 million. Building the actual C conglomerate Intrawest at a cost house is extra. •F I L S " of more than 1700 million. A $200 million village is also go- / 1111 At River Run, a series of pedes ing up at the base of Winter Park, K' V• trian plazas unfolds between large, which for pearly 60 years has been " buildings that, due to the layout a handy day-skier destination sans and rooflines, don't seem massive spiffy restaurants, nightlife or or overpowering. even much lodging. "The idea Is to have pedestrians Behind these developments are walking through a sequence of the emerging demographics of ski The Denver Post Lyn Ahvets clearly defined experiences," said resorts, with baby-boomer families Aspen architect John Cottle, who snapping up second homes. Skiers walk through Keystone's River Run village recently, headed toward another helped design three River Run day on the slopes. The $700 million project Includes a series of pedestrian plazas. buildings and the Village at Winter Please see MOUNTAINS on 6B y ~i: w r yid f ~ ~ R I The Denver Post / Lyn Ah"Is Clark SMtlypennis WeElkk Archttects Winter Park Resort is building anew "villaget' on the former parking This drawing shows Aspen Highlands Village, which Is being built at the ski resort lot next to existing buildings at the base of }he ski runs. The project reflects the design lines of classic national. park lodges in the West 68 THE DENV Ski villa g*es, use. L fiodges for design MOUNTAINS from Page 513 Aspen Highlands, and the,approval l process for Highlands took more Colorado, a major moneyman than four years and 90 public f hg$.Peen Houston developer Gerald meetings. Hines, who is building both the The Highlands approval process Aspen Highlands and Winter Park also resulted in a.60 percent reduc- The Deriver Post i Lyn Alweis - vMAges with the aid of world-class tion in the number of housing units The Golden Peak Lodge at Vail architect Robert A.M. Stern of adjacent to the village. features a small pedestrian New York City and the Colorado "People who'd skied the old pla- za at the base of the ski slope. l firm of Cottle Graybeal Yaw of Highlands for years said, 'you're Aspen and Telluride. going to ruin my Highlands,' " said ,We learned that they evolved over =In more than 20 years, Stern has architect Stern. "What we're actu= time - that allowed good deci- done numerous projects for Hines ally doing is making Highlands sions to be reinforced and bad ones of, the type that are not only highly more accessible to everyone - and culled out. At Highlands, our chal- profitable but are of such fine de- not only residents who can afford len a was to do it all in a short sign as to end up in full color in $75 the condos. With better lifts, more g „ cOlfee-table architecture books day skiers: will use the mountain. time. and less-pricey texts. And the village will work year- Since the area opened in 1958, Stern is. one of less than a dozen round with affordable housing for Aspen Highlands had been a throw- bona-fide "box-office" architects ski company employees in winter back to the gravel parking =dome call them celebrity archi and music students in summer." lot/funky base building mode of tests - in America whose name n, Yirghirarrlrs dnlr'Wmwr-~ar'x; 1960s_skiing that now survives, alone on a project assures the press Hines trusts his architects as more among major Colorado ski areas, - tfge.. of higher rental rates. Philip than hired hands. only at Arapahoe Basin. Johnson, who has also done many "More than most developers, New lifts went in during the past world-famous buildings for Hines Gerry Hines has been supportive of couple of years, but serious the spring arid.. designed Denver's "mailbox" architects - especially the imagi- changes construction began last pedestrian- Norwest Center, is another. native and controversial architects cfriendly village. Smaller than the In his spare time; Stern is dean :that developers typically stay village being built by Hines at Win- otAhe Yale University School of away from, said Stern, who has ter Park, the Stern-and-Wyatt-de- A;ri hitecture. worked with Hines for more.than signed village uses stone and tim- Stern and partner Graham Wy- 20 years and who is. working'-on ber for lodges and commercial art designed the village at Aspen three mega-million-dollar projects buildings on either side of the Highlands, where construction - in Boston, Mexico City and Bar- street nestled at the base of High- started last summer. First-phase celona, Spain - for Hines Inter- lands' Thunderbowl slope. completion is expected late in ests. Together, the Thunderbowl and 2bYxb. In the spring of 1992, Stem and Maroon "neighborhoods" at Aspen `;Cottle Graybeal Yaw did three of partner Graham Wyatt accompa- Highlands village will offer 73 con- the---buildings at Keystone's pedes- hied Hines on a tour~of ski areas in dos, 32 townhomes and 31 single- dia"n River Run village; they were Switzerland and Austria. "We familhomesites. The townhomes finished in 1996. It also designed looked at areas that have a sense y. _ each one tare de- the-village of Winter Park, which is of place," Stern said. "We' also signed by architect nDenni Wed- scheduled to open in phases'during looked at some high-rise resorts. in lick, who: spent a dozen years w th 200D and 2001. the south of France to be. sure of' Philip Johnson. The design features of these pe- what, we didn't want to do." The. village will have 111 tot l des_trian-scale projects can be trac- Said Wyatt: "Many people units of affordable housing for ski ed- th the hewn-log lodges.at fa- tried to hark back to the mountain= compa ny employees and summer rdbtrs western national parks:. lodge tradition. But the results music 3tpes is an international $9 bil-_ have often been.'thin," synthetic students. The units will be lien- company.. The 150-person and Aemporary. We're lucky to ad~ wo g hto stric e Aspet hour ng Stern firm is also international in have a client like.Hines who.stip- rgph and designs $200 million ports doing this with a:rohustness. .'•:Please see MOUNTAINS on 86 Werth of construction. per year. of architecture that many ski areas Cottle Graybeal Yaw isn't as big, simply don't have." . but has won a slew of. awards for . During the 1992 European-trip, fine- design around Aspen and "we looked not only at the .archi- Snowmass and in Canada,. France, _ tecture of ski. areas, but how ;those Japan and South Korea. villages were organized to handle 2pt everyone was thrilled by the cars in an environment.that , feels Hines projects at Winter Park and strictly pedestrian;" Wyatt said. ;,,WinterVark -expanding ease area MOUNTAINS from Page 6B ~ ]Wand income guidelines. -`We wanted to complement, not plicate, Aspen," Stern said. "At =hlands village, there's a long :pedestrian-scale street running be- -UWen two rows of low-rise build- ending at a big plaza area, -teeing the lift, where people can sit :the sun." 'Denver- . area skiers think of Win- r Park as a warm and fuzzy old end, but this season, construction cranes and concrete slabs have Vrouted from the snow just be- yond the Zephyr Express lift - where the first phase of the village is going up. When complete, the Zephyr slo- peside mountain lodge will be the first phase of a two-part lodge - leemplex with 230 condos, curving -=around a village center. Eventual- ly,' there could be three different ';"neighborhoods" wrapped around ••4he center. The lodges and village buildings " iVill have rooflines slanted at dif- •-ferent levels to soften what could 'We, in less skilled hands, a mono- "Iffhic mass. Natural materials of : 'wood and stone will echo national =pa k lodges instead of the concrete, ,glass and steel seen elsewhere. .,,,,,Yhe village will be able to ac- commodate more than i0 restau, Yfits and 30 or more retail spaces .,;mound a central area with lots of open space. And a river the Fra- ter - runs through it. „;`,We're going to add more shop- ping and nice restaurants to en- hance, but not change, the exrn- ence at Winter Park," said Winter Park President Gary DeFrange. "Ours will be a pedestrian village in the true sense - with 25 of its 76 acres as open space." The mass-market approach, said ai+ehitect John Cottle, has brought "density such as you have in Waiki- ki -and Miami Beach to the moun- tains. The scale of mountain devel- opment and the scale of the corporations doing those projects has exploded to many, many times what it used to be in only the last fift years. "The Villages at . Winter Park aad Highlands, we think, will still have a soul - because Gerry Hines insists on it. He's had a home near there for years, loves the place and Wouldn't dream of ruining it. The truth is that, if a developer wants to treat an area with respect, it can be done. But, today, resort demand is ~ad great that you can get away with no respect and still make a killing.', MINUTES TOWN OF VAIL COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 1999 The evening meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, March 2, 1999. v MEMBERS PRESENT: Rod Ford, Mayor Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro-tem Bob Armour Michael Arnett Kevin Foley Michael Jewett Sybill Navas STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Scott Magoun, a former Town of Vail bus driver, addressed the Council regarding a small claims suit that had been filed against him by the Town. He stated he was under the impression the Town had been paid by their insurance company for the damage caused, and was questioning his being sued for the damages as well. Town Attorney Moorhead stated the issue would be investigated and Mr. Magoun should arrange a meeting with the Town Manager. Also under Citizen Participation, Anne Esson, representing the Vail Tomorrow expanded housing team, addressed the Council, expressing their strong support to build rental seasonal housing on the Mountain Bell site, as well as the possibility of a fire station located on that site. Other supporters addressing the Council in favor of seasonal housing were Farrow Hitt, Steve Rosenthal, Carol and Paul Hymers, Dennis Jones, Sallv Jackie, and Kaye Ferry. The group also expressed their interest in being involved in the development of this parcel, stating it had the least impact on surrounding neighborhoods and was not purchased with real estate transfer tax money. Kaye Ferry urged the Council to move quickly on the development of this site, with anticipated occupancy by fall of 1999. Mayor Ford stated a public process would be implemented within the next 30 to 45 days to consider both this site and a possible site on Spraddle Creek for the addition of a fire station. He thanked the group for their interest in this site. The second item on the agenda was the consent agenda for minutes of the February 2 and 16, 1999. Sybill Navas made a motion to approve the minutes and Bob Armour seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The third item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance 42, Series of 1999, an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund, Booth Creek Debt Service Fund, Heavy Equipment Fund, Housing Fund, Capital Projects Fund, and Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund of the 1999 Budget and the Financial Plan for the Town of Vail. Steve Thompson, Finance Director, presented the ordinance to the Council, stating that the purpose of this ordinance was to roll forward any unspent funds from these specific groups to finish projects in 1999. Charles Bernhardt questioned whether the RETT fund was shown in a separate account. Steve Thompson stated that it was shown as a separate fund so that expenditures were shown more easily in the future. After some discussion, Bob Armour made a motion to approve Ordinance 92, Series of 1999, on first reading.and Ludwig Kurz seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The fourth item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance #3, Series of 1999, an ordinance amending Title 12, Zoning Regulations, relating to the Lionshead Master Plan. Dominic Mauriello, Chief of Planning, presented the ordinance to the Council, stating that after the presentation to the Council at the afternoon worksession, the ordinance had changed dramatically, and wished to postpone the first reading to the March 16`h meeting. Discussion followed, with comments from Jim Lamont, East Village Homeowners Association. regarding notification of property owners in Lionshead of proposed changes, rezoning, and timeshare issues. Dave Corbin, representing Vail Associates, also addressed the Council, regarding conditional uses for the redevelopment in the west end considered by Lionshead mixed uses district. After further discussion, Councilmember Mike Jewett made a motion to table the ordinance and Kevin Foley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The fifth item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance #4, Series of 1999, the rezoning of parcels of land to new zone districts. This item was included in the motion to table Ordinance #3, Series of 1999, and was voted on unanimously to table until the March 16`h evening meeting. The sixth item on the agenda was Resolution #4, Series of 1999, a resolution approving the Miller Ranch- Berry Creek Intergovernmental Agreement. Town Attorney Moorhead presented the proposed resolution to the Council. Discussion followed regarding water rights issues, cost-sharing, affordable housing designations, and the need to place a conservation easement on open space parcels. After some discussion, Councilmember Jewett made a motion to deny Resolution #4, Series of 1999, and Councilmember Armour seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-3, Councilmembers Arnett, Ford and Kurz against the motion. The seventh item on the agenda was the Town Manager Report. Town Manager McLaurin stated the Federal Highway Administration and the Colorado Department of Transportation had approved the town's request to construct a free right on the eastbound ramp of 1-70 at the Main Vail roundabout. McLaurin stated the project would be bid in the next 60 days. As there was no further business. a motion was made by Councilmember Arnett to adjourn the meeting and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Armour. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted: Robert E. Ford Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson Town Clerk (Minutes taken by Mary A. Caster) VAIL TOWN COUNCIL - MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 16, 1999 7:00 P.M. The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held in the Town Council Chambers on Tuesday, March _ 16, 1999. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Rob Ford, Mayor Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro-Tem Bob Armour Michael Arnett Kevin Foley Michael Jewett Sybill Navas STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. There was no citizen participation. The second item on the agenda was an appointment to the Vail Valley Marketing Board. There was one open position on the Vail Valley Marketing Board with a term expiration date of December, 2000. The Town Council voted by written ballot. Council member-Sybill Navas made a motion to appoint Sandra Sage to the Vail Valley Marketing Board, and Council member Bob Armour seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The third item on the agenda were appointments to the Art in Public Places Board. There were three open positions on the Art In Public Places Board all with a term expiration date of April, 2002. The Town Council voted by written ballot. Council member Sybill Navas made a motion to re-appoint Sherry Dorward, George Lamb, and Kyle Webb to the Art In Public Places Board, and the motion was seconded by Council member Bob Armour. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Mayor Rob Ford thanked everyone for applying for these positions. The fourth item on the agenda was second reading of Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1999, Making Supplemental Appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund, Booth Creek Debt Service Fund, Heavy Equipment Fund, Housing Fund, Capital Projects Fund, and Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund of the 1999 Budget and the Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and Authorizing the Expenditures of Said Appropriations as Set Forth Herein; and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. Steve Thompson, Finance Director, said at this time of the year a supplemental appropriation is required primarily to appropriate funds in 1999 for unspent appropriations in 1998 and to appropriate funds needed for the housing buy down program. The appropriations lapse at the end of the year and need to be re- appropriated each year. The only additional change is adding $79,000 to the budget for the radios discussed at the work session that afternoon. 1 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes March 16, 1999 Council member Bob Armour made a motion to approve on second reading, Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1999, Council member Ludwig Kurz seconded the motion. Council member Kevin Foley said he voted for the first appropriation, however, he would not vote for it a second time. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 6-1, Council member Kevin Foley against. The fifth item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 amending Title 12, Zoning Regulations, By Adding Two New Zone Districts As Chapter 7H: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Chapter 71: Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District In Order To Implement The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; Amending Chapter 2, Definitions, Section 12-2-2: Definitions; Amending Chapter 4, Districts Established, Section 12-4-1: Designated, By Adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District; Amending Chapter 10, Off-Street Parking And Loading, Section 12-10-17: Leasing Of Parking Spaces; Amending Chapter 10, Off-Street Parking And Loading, Section 12-10-16: Exempt Areas; Parking Fund Established; Amending Chapter 13, Employee Housing, Section 12-13-6: Type III Employee Housing Unit; Amending Chapter 13, Employee Housing, Section 12-13-7: Type IV Employee Housing Unit; Amending Chapter 14, Supplemental Regulations, Section 12-14-19: Satellite Dish Antennas; Amending Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area, Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, And Exclusions, Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements By Zone District; Amending Title 12 Sign Regulations, Chapter 4, Sign Categories, Section 11-4A-1: Signs Permitted In Zoning Districts; And Amending Title 5, Public Health And Safety, Chapter 1, Public Nuisances, Section 5-1-7: Noise Prohibited. Mayor Rob asked Dominic to clarify for the community members how many times this ordinance had been discussed before. Dominic stated the ordinance had been discussed three times before, plus the most recent discussion at this afternoons work session. Council member Sybill Navas asked if Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 and Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999 were being discussed together. She said she had concerns with Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999. Dominic clarified the difference between the two ordinances for the community audience. Council member Sybill Navas doesn't feel it's appropriate to treat the bulk of the Lionshead Redevelopment the same as some of the outlying areas of Lionshead. She would like to see the outlying areas treated differently from the core area of Lionshead. She wanted staff to look at changing the permitted uses and the conditional uses for these areas. The properties on the eastern and western ends of Lionshead are more residential. Mayor Rob Ford clarified that the western and eastern end properties of Lionshead might be carved out of the permitted use but be allowed to come before the town for conditional uses on the first floor. Council member Sybill Navas said the core area is targeted for more commercial spaces. . Council member Ludwig Kurz requested clarification of the last concern. He said lodging is permitted on the first floor on all of the Lionshead properties. Council member Sybill Navas stated commercial property was permitted throughout the Lionshead area. Russ Forrest, Community Development Director, stated that currently the commercial uses in the bulk of Lionshead are a permitted use. 2 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes March 16, 1999 Dominic Mauriello, Chief of Planning, said the reason it would be a conditional use instead of a permitted use is because a particular area may warrant the location of a hotel or condominium unit on the first floor instead of a commercial space. The conditional use would allow the PEC to make this determination of appropriateness. Further discussion ensued. Dominic said there would need to be another zone district to accommodate the changes requested for the Lodge at Lionshead and Vail International, if that was the Council's desire. Mayor Rob Ford said this was the concern. Dominic made recommendation that the specific parcels be pulled out of the ordinance and then go back to the neighborhoods and draft another ordinance for those properties. He asked Council what properties in the west-end of Lionshead they are referring to. Council member Sybill Navas said the Vail Spa was impacted and possibly the multiple-family areas in the east. Dominic said the western sections of Lionshead were proposed as a community hub, with commercial contemplated in the Master Plan. Dominic asked if by removing the two eastern end properties and Vail Spa, Council would consider moving forward with the ordinance with those exceptions. Council member Sybill Navas asked if the town was limiting conditional uses to multi-residential units from the second floor and above by the wording in the ordinance. Dominic said no. Council member Sybill Navas made a motion to approve on first reading, Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999, Council member Michael Arnett seconded the motion. Mayor Rob Ford asked for community input. Jim Miller, representing the Lodge at Lionshead, which has 56 owners, said the Lodge at Lionshead has been involved with the town staff for 1-1/2 years in this process. They appreciate the staffs discussions and they had a homeowner's meeting in July and wish to be cooperative and supportive of the Lionshead Master Plan but said they need more time to discuss with all, of the owners. He requested an exception to the Lionshead Mixed Use - 1 Zone District (LMU1) until the owners of the Lodge at Lionshead understand and agree to the rezoning. He said when you're least informed; you're more concerned. They are definitely in favor of doing something with the parking structure, it's an eyesore, and something needs to be done. He is concerned about traffic and parking. The owners like the park-like open space on their street and they want the delivery areas, and the like moved. Jim summarized the concerns and requests of the owners of Lodge at Lionshead. He stated John Dunn's purpose was sincere and not threatening. He thanked the council for their attention. Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association (EVHOA), said the EVHOA has memberships who have properties in the Lionshead area, which are affected. He respectfully suggested that between readings it is appropriate to sit down with staff and go through the zoning ordinance as proposed to clarify the zoning issues and concerns. The EVHOA is concerned and does not want the quality of residential areas diminished in any way. The Lion Square Lodge expansion of residential uses would have to go through the conditional use permit process. He said the conditional use process is inconsistently applied. He said he would like the staff to review the changes in use, parking zones districts to mixed use, time-share issues, public notice and the issue of impact fees. He believes issues that can 3 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes March 16, 1999 be adopted in the ordinance can be rolled forward into all zone districts. He has a concern that fair and equal treatment be applied throughout all the zone districts. Joe Staufer, a local resident, said the same problem might come up in the future in the Public Accommodation (PA) zone district. He said it doesn't make sense to change zoning for properties that are _ happy with what they currently have now. He said this ordinance only applies to one property. He encourages zoning commercial uses for present hotel rooms. He then stated that he had not read either of the proposed ordinances. Mayor Rob Ford asked Dominic and Russ to outline the differences of what zoning is presently there and how this ordinance changes the current zoning. Dominic said the uses stay mostly the same, the ordinance makes these properties consistent with the Lionshead Master Plan. Council member Kevin Foley asked that Section 12-15-2 be changed as discussed earlier and incorporated into the motion, by adding the term "up to". Council member Sybill Navas made a motion to approve on first reading, Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 with the modification, Council member Michael Arnett seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Tom Moorhead said John Dunn stated he was not certain, but thought a property owner approval was needed to rezone a property. It is basic to zoning that the interest of the property owner is secondary to the common interest of the area. The zoning regulation must be reasonable in relation to the property but there is no requirement that there be consent by the property owners. The sixth item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999, an ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map For The Town Of Vail In Accordance With Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Chapter 5, Zoning Map; Rezoning Parcels Of Land In The Lionshead Area In Accordance With The Attached Map To Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District And Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District; And Rezoning Tract E And The Lionshead Parking Structure In Accordance With The Attached Map To General Use District. Dominic Mauriello, Chief of Planning, said this is an ordinance rezoning areas of Lionshead to new zone districts. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 Districts in accordance with the map included in your packet and rezoning Tract E and the Lionshead parking structure from Parking District to General Use District. The details of the proposal are contained in the February 22, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum and proposed Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999, which are included in the Town Council packet. The Planning and Environmental Commission, at its February 22, 1999 meeting, recommended approval (unanimously) of the proposed rezonings. Council member Sybill Navas made a motion to approve on first reading, Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999, with the condition of removing the Vail International building and the Lodge at Lionshead building from the ordinance, the motion was seconded by Council member Ludwig Kurz. Additional discussion ensued. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. 4 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes March 16, 1999 b The seventh item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1999, an Ordinance Amending Title 3, Chapter 4, Section 3-4-1 of the Municipal Code, to Remove Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) Representation on the Design Review Board (DRB). Jeff Hunt, Senior Planner, said the existing language of Chapter 4, Design Review Board, of the Town _ Code, states that "The design review board shall be composed of five (5) members. Four (4) members shall be residents of the Town, appointed by the Town Council, and the fifth member shall be a member of the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town." He said PEC members have stated that the amount of time necessary to attend both the PEC meetings and the DRB meetings was excessive and difficult for working professionals to attend. On February 23, 1999, the Town Council directed staff to present an ordinance that would remove the requirement that a PEC member serve on the DRB. Diana Donovan, a local resident, said she served on the DRB and the PEC in years past and said she feels it is very important that a PEC member be on the DRB board. She feels it is a cop out and lack of commitment. She said it is important to have the overlap and that it is not essential all the time. The tie between PEC and DRB is not necessarily a bad thing. She doesn't think it is a good idea to do away with this requirement. The boards operated this way for 30 years. Council member Ludwig Kurz made a motion to approve on first reading, Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1999, Council member Mike Jewett seconded the motion. Council member Ludwig Kurz said one of the reasons it is difficult to get and retain good people because it takes a lot of time to do the job. He agrees that there are times and issues that it is a good idea to have the contact between DRB and PEC.. There are ways to have that happen without it being the same structure as in the past. Council member Bob Armour said he could argue both sides of this issue. He said he will vote in opposition because as a former PEC member he saw changes on projects between the time it went from the PEC and the DRB time frames and the changes fell through the cracks. Council member Mike Arnett said that when he served on the DRB, while at times it was beneficial to have a PEC member on the DRB, he felt at times it was unfair to the applicant to have a PEC member on the DRB. He stated at times the term of the PEC member would be up and then another PEC member would be on the DRB, which hampered the process. He will vote in favor of the ordinance. Council member Sybill Navas said she can see both sides of this issue but would vote against this ordinance and stated the cross communication between the boards is valuable. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 4-3, Council members Bob Armour, Sybill Navas and Kevin Foley against. The eighth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1999, an Emergency Ordinance Extending the Terms of the Present Members of the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) for Ninety (90) Days from March 31, 1999 and Declaring an Emergency. Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney, said the Town of Vail code states the expiration of some of the current board members is March 31, 1999. He said there are currently three PEC openings and two DRB openings. Council members Ludwig Kurz asked if current members have a choice in the matter. Russ Forrest, Community Development Director, stated they have talked with the current members. He said the Town Council wishes to extend the period of time to advertise for available positions on the Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board to allow for more applicants to submit their letters of interest in the Boards. 5 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes March 16, 1999 i Council member Bob Armour made a motion to approve emergency Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1999, Council member Ludwig Kurz seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The ninth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 4, Series of 1999, a Resolution Adopting the Miller Ranch-Berry Creek Intergovernmental Agreement. Mayor Rob Ford stated this Intergovernmental Agreement has been in the works for 14 months. This agreement is a "broad stroke" for parcels of land at the Miller Ranch Berry Creek property. It was discussed at the work session earlier today. He said the Council member Mike Arnett met with the other partners of the property about where to go after this IGA is approved. The IGA has been approved by the . Recreation Authority Board of Directors and is now being reconsidered by the Vail Town Council and requested the Council to adopt Resolution No. 4, Series of 1999. Council member Bob Armour asked about his long-standing concern with regard to the long-term expense to the Vail Taxpayers. The Town of Vail owns 60%, so is this exposing the Town of Vail to 60% of the infrastructure. Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney, said the IGA does not authorize any expenditure of funds or building of any infrastructure. He also stated there could be no action taken without the Town of Vail vote on the Eagle County Recreation Authority. Council member Bob Armour asked if any infrastructure of the roads would need to have a Town of Vail representative. Tom said any action taken on this property requires a two-thirds approval of the board, which means the Town of Vail would have to vote in favor of any changes. Council member Bob Armour said the 1990 IGA is convoluted. Council member Kevin Foley thanked everyone involved for their efforts and for explaining the process. John Canning, a 12-year resident of East Vail, stated he has concerns with the IGA. He thought the original purpose of this property was for open space and recreation. He operated the Berry Creek Ranch for two years and knows a lot about the property. He said he feels this is the most dysfunctional board because nothing has ever been done. He wants to know what is going to happen to this property. He is concerned that the recreation authority decided to partner with the school district and now the school district is running the show. He doesn't want a road in the middle of the property. He is also concerned if funds to purchase this property came from RETT funds. Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney, said it is his understanding that RETT funds were not used. The Town of Vail had an option on both pieces of property. The Berry Creek property is encumbered with an easement for the road. Also, the original contracts that were assumed by the Town of Vail show that what is being done is consistent with the intent originally planned. The far-eastern piece of property is used for the best benefit. This plan is from surrounding property owners input as well as the school districts. Council member Mike Jewett asked Tom and Bob if someone could see the bond that was used to buy the property. Bob McLaurin, Town Manager, said a bond purchased this property and that Steve Thompson, Finance Director, could show him the documents. 6 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes March 16, 1999 J Tom Braun, representing the Eagle County School District, said there were a couple of hypothetical scenarios of how this property could be designed with roads, utilities, etc. and various opportunities were had by all parties involved. Council member Kevin Foley asked Tom Braun if the siting of the road has been done. _ Tom Braun, along with concurrence from Tom Moorhead, said the road has not been designed yet. There are alternative methods for the road however they have located the general road as it is on the current map. Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney, said small pieces of property have been conveyed around this area for exchanges of access and easements. Council member Mike Arnett made a motion to approve Resolution No. 4, Series of 1999, Council member Ludwig Kurz seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 6-1, Council member Mike Jewett against. The tenth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob McLaurin, Town Manager discussed the Holy Cross franchise agreement. He said Council might want to reconsider the franchise fee. Council member Bob Armour asked what time frame they have to make decisions. Bob McLaurin said they have until July. He said budget issues are being discussed now. Council member Kevin Foley asked if 4% was a normal franchise fee. Bob McLaurin said other cities have 3%-4% franchise fees. Bob also stated there was a great "sustainable conference" the last 2 days. He complimented Russ Forrest for doing a terrific job putting it together. As there was no further business, a motion was made by Council member Kevin Foley to adjourn the meeting and Council member Ludwig Kurz seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion -passed unanimously, 7-0. The meeting.was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Rob Ford Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson Town Clerk 7 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes March 16, 1999 PROCLAMATION NO. 1, 1999 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, from the inception of this nation, it has been the responsibility of the states and - their local governments to adopt legislation and administer laws and ordinances wherever necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of their citizens; and WHEREAS, it has been a fundamental part of the democratic principles of this nation to involve all interested and affected parties in the formulation, adoption and administration of such laws and ordinances; and WHEREAS, among the most basic and essential of laws and ordinances are those which are designed to protect the public's health and safety in the buildings in which we live, work and play; and WHEREAS, in an attempt to assure such safety, the Town of Vail, State of Colorado, has adopted and administers the Uniform Building Code and other model codes, which codes have been designed and maintained by building officials with valuable assistance from consumers, fire prevention officials, design professionals and the construction industry; and WHEREAS, it is through the efforts of local building officials and fire prevention officials and their cooperative relationship with the construction industry that the administration of these health and safety regulations is accomplished, NOW THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Vail, State of Colorado, does hereby designate the week of April 5-9, 1999, as International Building Safety Week within the Town of Vail. The Town Council urges all of the citizens of the town to use this week to visit the Town's Building Safety and Inspection Services Division office in the Community Development Department and to better familiarize themselves with the important building safety information and services provided by the people there. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the Town Seal this 6th Day of April, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk ~ d BOOTH CREEK PRESCRIBED BURN Forest Supervisor ORGANIZATION Martha Ketelle Hand Ignition - Complexity Level 1 Prescribed Fire Manager Total Needed Personnel = 4, I RXM1 Total Optional Personnel = 21V Burn Boss RXB1 (I) Holding Specialist ignition Specialist Fire Information Prescribed Fire DIVS (1) Officer IOF1213 Behavior Analyst Safety Officer RXI1 (1) (1) RXFA (1) SOF12 (1) I Y Asst. Fire I Law Enforcement Structure Protection Smoke Monitors Ignition Crew Information Officer Officers Strike Team Leader FFTI/FFT2 (1) IOF12/3 (2) ( USFS LEO (1) STEN (1) (7+) Vail PD (2) I I Other Holy Cross Prescribed Fire Sign Crews Personnel Monitors (as needed) RXFM (1) (2) *Note* These resources are optional, but are higiUy recomelnended. Type 112Engine Type 112Engine Type 112Engine Type 112Engine Type 112Engine ENGB (1) ENGB (1) ENGB (1) ENGB (1) ENGB (1) FFTI1FFT2 (3) FFT11FFT2 (3) FFTIIFFT2 (3) FFTI1FFT2 (3) FFT11FFT2 (3) Type 5/6 Engine Type 5/6 Engine Type 5/6 Engine Type 5/6 Engine Holding Squad #1 Holding Squad #2 ENGB (1) ENGB (1) ENGB (1) ENGB (1) FFT1 (1) FFT1 (1) FFTI/FFT2 (2) FFTI/FFT2 (2) FFT1/FFT2 (2) FFT1/FFT2 (2) FFTI/FFT2 (4) FFTI/FFT2 (4) [11 2EU 3? 4111 51 6[1 7 8 9 10 A B - C r i 1 ~ 4 I f3 F~ f_ 2 l~ 11 Legend - - oi•,a Private Land Boundary Broadcast Burn Unit Boundary BOOTH CREEK PRESCRIBED BURN Cut/Pile/Burn Unit Boundary National Forest Wilderness N Structures on National Forest pb 311 999 RESOLUTION NO. 5 SERIES OF 1999 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PLAN FOR AROSA/GARMISCH ANNEXATION, AN AREA WITHIN THREE MILES OF THE TOWN OF VAIL BOUNDARY, BEING 2.66 ACRES MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS AN UNPLATTED PORTION OF THE SE SE '/4, SE/,, SW '/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WEST. - WHEREAS. this 2.66 acres in the Arosa/Garmisch area was acquired through the Land Exchange pursuantto the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement with the United States Forest Service: and WHEREAS, the Arosa/Garmisch annexation is consistent with the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan adopted by the Town of Vail: and WHEREAS. Section 31-12-105. Limitations, of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires that prior to completion of any annexation within the three mile area of the municipal boundary. the municipality shall have in place a plan for that area: and WHEREAS. this annexation is of unincorporated municipally owned land as described in Section 31-12-106. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail. Colorado: 1. That the Vail Toxin Council hereby approves the plan for the Arosa/Garmisch annexation, an area within three miles of the Town of Vail boundary attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. This plan readily describes the proposed location. character, and extent of the proposed land uses for this annexation as required by Section 31-12-105(1)(e). 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED. READ. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of April, 1999. Robert E. Ford. Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson. Town Clerk C:\RESOLU99.5 Plan for Arosa/Garmish Annexation An area within 3 miles of the Town of Vail boundary. This plan is intended to generally describe the proposed location, character, and extent of the proposed land uses for this annexation (see attached map). The area is intended to be utilized as a public neighborhood - park with playground, paths and trails, open spaces, and other related public amenities. In addressing the state statutes, the following general use analysis is provided: • Streets No streets are planned for annexed area. • Subways No subways are planned for annexed area. • Bridges No vehicular bridges are proposed for the annexed area. Some minor pedestrian bridges may be constructed in conjunction with potential park/playground development. • Waterways No waterways are planned for annexed area. • Waterfronts No waterfronts are planned for annexed area. • Parkways No parkways are planned for annexed area. • Playgrounds A playground is planned for the a portion of the area being annexed. The area is intended to be developed as a neighborhood oriented park and playground with other ancillary uses. • Squares No squares are planned for annexed area. • Parks This area is intended to serve as a neighborhood park. • Aviation fields No aviation fields are planned for annexed area. • Other public ways The area may include pedestrian walkways, paths, and trails. • Grounds and Open Spaces The area is intended to be utilized as public land and includes some areas of open space. • Public Utilities The area is intended to be served by utilities and may contain easements and the like to serve uses on the site. • Terminals for water, light sanitation, transportation and power No such terminals are planned for annexed area. TOWN OF PAIL \\VAIL\DATA\everyone\dom\3mile.doc Exhibit A Arosa/Garmisch Annexatimon 2427 2412, .2 2437 2428 1f 5 2339 11 2448 2445 17 10 2395 2447 4 ,a Area to be annexed 239 2.66 acres 2455 fn 3 2458 2409 g 7 Q 2457 2465 C7 2 . 46.26' 0 2486 2-I 241 ~ 2427 Z 5 21 v 2 2475 2489 2427 2 248. _ 4 2477 28 22 M ii S CO 2476 2429 U 2435 27 23 VVEP 247E 243? ...__OWn BOUnda[1/ 2437 26 24 2430 2488 25 2439 2447 5 '10 2434 25 1 1% 2507 5 .2 243Cs 2603 2498 13 8 q d „ 2448 2517 2506 2498 9 2572 ` 2440 2653 , 2522 10 14 7 2 3 25,6 2457 ` u` bYi 24,.0 2 2565 2527 3 2802 9 15 b 251.8 2459 245° a33 3 2575 2612 2626 ;s zau; a 2487 4 24 5 6 20x3 7 4 2622 25&5 25788 2537 2528 17 245'3 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West N W E S ORDINANCE NO. 7 Series of 1999 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING AN AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS AROSA/GARMISCH, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has acquired 2.66 acres in the Arosa/Gramisch area from the United States Forest Service pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement: and WHEREAS, this annexation of unincorporated municipally-owned land is being completed pursuant to Section 31-12-106(3) of the Colorado Revised Statutes; and WHEREAS, such unilateral annexation does not require notice and hearing as provided in Sections 31-12-108 and 31-12-109; and WHEREAS, the Town Council, pursuant to Resolution No. 5, Series of 1999, has in place a plan for the area to be annexed; and WHEREAS, this is an area eligible for annexation as set forth in Sections 31-12- 104(1)(a) and 31-12-105. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Annexation of the area commonly known as Arosa/Garmisch consisting of 2.66 acres being an unplatted portion of the SE SE SE 'Y4, SW of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto: A. The area proposed to be annexed is owned by the annexing municipality and is not solely a public street or right-of-way. B. Not less than 1/6 of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the annexing municipality. C. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the annexing municipality. D. Said area is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. E. Said area is integrated with the annexing municipality and is consistent with the Comprehensive Open Land Plan. F. This annexation fulfills all requirements of Section 13-12-105, Limitations in the Colorado Revised Statutes, including that the municipality has in place a plan for that area as required by Section 31-12-105(1)(e). Section 2. Annexations costs. All costs and expenses connected with the annexation shall be paid by the Town of Vail, Colorado. Section 3. Filing Copies of the Annexation Plan and Annexing Ordinance. A. A copy of the annexation map (Exhibit A) with the original of this annexation ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Vail. B. The Town Clerk shall file for recording two (2) certified copies of this annexation ordinance and a map of the area annexed containing a legal description of such area with the County Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado. C. The County Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County shall be directed to file one (1) certified copy of the annexation ordinance and map with the Division of Local Government of the Department of Local Affairs. ~rSection 4. Within ninety (90) days after the effective date hereof, the Town of Vail, Colorado shall impose zoning on the annexed area in according with Chapter 18.68 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, Colorado. Section 5. This annexation shall take effect in accordance with the Charter of the Town of Vail and the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Section 6. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 7. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this . ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 8. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 9. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of April, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 20th day of April, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 16th day of March, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk J Plan for arosa/Garmish .-annexation An area within 3 miles of the Town of Vail boundary. This plan is intended to generally describe the proposed location, character, and extent of the proposed land uses for this aianexation (see attached map). The area is intended to be utiiized as a public neighborhood park with playground, paths and trails, open spaces, and other related public amenities. In addressing the state statutes, the following general use analysis is provided: • Streets No streets are planned for annexed area. • Subways No subways are planned for annexed area. • Bridges No vehicular bridges are proposed for the annexed area. Some minor pedestrian bridges may be constructed in conjunction with potential park/playground development. • Watervays No waterways are planned for annexed area. • Waterfronts No waterfronts are planned for annexed area. • Parkways No parkways are planned for annexed area. • Plavtrrounds A playground is planned for the a portion of the area being annexed. The area is intended to be developed as a neighborhood oriented park and playground with other ancillary uses. • Squares No squares are planned for annexed area. • Parks This area is intended to sere as a neighborhood park. • Aviation fields No aviation fields are planned for annexed area. • Other public ways The area may include pedestrian walkways, paths, and trails. • Grounds and Open Spaces The area is intended to be utilized as public land and includes some areas of open space. • Public Utilities The area is intended to be served by utilities and may contain easements and the like to serve uses on the site. • Terminals for water, light sanitation, transportation and power No such terminals are planned for annexed area. TOWS' OF MIL \\VAIL\DATA\everyone\dom\3mile.doc Exhibit A Arosa/Garmisch Annexati"on `4_ 2°79 .2 0 71?7 24,3 1e S 2369 11 2446 24x5 17 '10 '13'35 2447 4 16 Area to be annexed ° 239 2.66 acres 2455 3 2453 '9 9 7 Q 246° 245? 24x5 Z 24e,3 2; 5 Q 2-I J 2475 2489 2427 = •:•:.y•.;•• ::.::::::::::::y;. y: 246? 4 O Cy')'' 2470 --129 U SRI 24.,5 `y 7, 23 WEi1 _S. t;. 1 2e 24 24311 LT•el,l.:.::::,o::.: 2437 24^•,9 25 2439 own Bounds A:u 2550 .Z 243:6 2003 2448 ;3 6 3 4 11 2449 2517 25U6 2490 9 2572 _ 244•^. 2613 1 25 2 16 14 7 2 3 1516 2457 -4.n 2 2565 7 0 3 9 2062 :5 245-- 1.6 24,9 25 2576 0 2612 2520 .6 240, 4 2407 4 24 --f> 3 ' 4 2822 2" TA 2537 252e 17 24876 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West N W E S ORDINANCE NO. 8 Series of 1999 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 5, ZONING MAP; APPLYING ZONE DISTRICT DESIGNATION TO A PORTION OF UNZONED PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE TOWN OF VAIL PURSUANT TO THE LAND OWNERSHIP ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT AND ANNEXED BY ORDINANCE NO. 7, SERIES OF 1999 TO OUTDOOR RECREATION (OR) DISTRICT, SECTION 12-813 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AROSA DRIVE, AND ABUTTING 2497 AND 2487 GARMISCH TO THE EAST AND THE TOWN MANAGER'S HOUSE TO THE WEST MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS AN UNPLATTED PORTION OF THE SE SE 1/4, SE 1/4, SW'/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 81 WEST. WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to implement the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement with the United States Forest Service by zoning property acquired by the Town of Vail and annexed into the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that this zone designation is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, is consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and is consistent with the Open Lands Plan, and is appropriate for the area; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of this zoning map amendment at its March 22, 1999 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare to amend the official Town of Vail zoning map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The official zoning map of the Town of Vail is hereby amended as follows: An unplatted portion of the SE Y4, SE '/4, SE '/4, SW '/4 of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, of previously unzoned property owned by the United States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement shall be included in the Outdoor Recreation (OR) District. Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of April, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 20th day of April, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 20th day of April, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk ORDINANCE NO.. 9 Series of 1999 AN ORDINANCE REZONING FOUR TRACTS FROM PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL (PS) DISTRICT, SECTION 12-6D TO RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER (RC) DISTRICT, SECTION 12-6E, LOCATED AT 2497, 2487, 2485 AND 2477 GARMISCH DRIVE, MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK H, VAIL DAS SHONE FILING NO. 2. WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by the Town of Vail to rezone the four parcels from Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) District to Residential Cluster (RC) District; and WHEREAS, 2hile the current zoning Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) District, allows residential development as a permitted use, the proposed Residential Cluster (RC) District provides an opportunity for a more effective development of the land for locals housing; and WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediate adjacent properties; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 12-5-3, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed zoning amendment and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, all notices required by Section 12-3-6 have been sent to the appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Section 12-3-7. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The Town Council finds that the procedures for the provision of rezoning property in the Town of Vail have been fulfilled, and the Town Council hereby received a report of recommendation from the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending the rezoning of said property. Section 2. The Town Council finds this proposed zoning action is in compliance with the Town of Vail Land Use Plan which is the master plan for guiding development within the Town of Vail. Section 3. The Town Council further finds that the proposed zone district is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, is consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and is appropriate for the area. Section 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof,. regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 6. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 7. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of April, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 20th day of April, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest" Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 20th day of April, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 22, 1999 SUBJECT: A request for a rezoning from property owned by the Town of Vail zoned Primary/Secondary to Residential Cluster located at 2497, 2487, 2485 and 2477 Garmisch Drive/ Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing #2. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Andy Knudtsen and Nina Timm Planner: Allison Ochs 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The Town of Vail is applying for a rezoning on property which is currently zoned Primary/Secondary Residential to Residential Cluster. This property, located at at 2497, 2487, 2485 and 2477 Garmisch Drive/ Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing #2, is owned by the Town of Vail, and is the site of the proposed Arosa/Garmisch Employee Housing and neighborhood park. The current plan for these four lots is to construct a 4-plex and duplex primarily on lots 2, 3, and 4. A neighborhood park is planned for lot 1 and the soon-to-be-annexed land to the west. The park will require a Conditional Use Permit. The site plan is still in the preliminary stage (see attached). 11. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request subject to review in Section V and the following finding: That the proposed zone district is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, is consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and is appropriate for the area. III. BACKGROUND The Town of Vail purchased these four lots from two families in 1990. When purchasing these lots, Council identified them to include a neighborhood park, open space, or employee housing. The 1994 Comprehensive Open Land Plan states that the land should be used for a public use, which includes employee housing. Neighborhood participation for proposals on this site began in October of 1998 and continued through November with neighborhood meetings with designers. Council approved the development of six units and a neighborhood park on November 17, 1998. On January 20, 1999, the site plan was brought to the Design Review Board for a conceptual review. On January 26, 1999, Council approved the concept of a 4-plex and duplex on the east side of the lot, with the neighborhood park on the west side of the lots and on the land to be acquired in the land exchange with the U.S. Forest Service. 1 TOWNO WAIL IV. ZONING ANALYSIS Lot Size: Lot 1:.26 acres (11,325.6 sq. ft.) Lot 2:.45 acres (19,602 sq. ft.) Lot 3:.24 acres (10,454.4 sq. ft.) Lot 4:.24 acres (10,454.4 sq. ft.) Total Area of Site: 1.19 acres or 51,836.4 sq. ft. Total Buildable Area: 1.19 acres or 51,836.4 sq. ft. Standard Current Zoning: PIS Proposed Zoning: RC Setbacks: 20715715' 20715715' Height: 30733' 30733' j Dwelling Units: • 2 du's per site, with 1 on lots less • 6 du's per buildable acre than 15,000 • Total of 7.14 du's allowed • Total of 5 du's allowed (plus 4 allowable EHU's) GRFA: • 25% of first 15,000 • 25% of buildable area 10% of next 15,000 225 sq. ft. per constructed single 5% over 30,000 family or duplex 425 sq. ft. per allowable du • Total of 12,959 sq. ft. • Total of 14,394.1 sq. ft. Site Coverage: I • 20% of total site area I • 25% of total site area • Total of 10,367 sq. ft. • 12,959.1 sq. ft. V. CRITERIA The PEC shall make the following findings before granting approval of a zone change request: 1) Is the existing zoning suitable with the existing land use on the site and adjacent land uses? The purpose of the rezoning is to allow for the development of six employee housing units and a neighborhood park. Each of the units will be sold to qualified buyers selected through a lottery process. Currently the four undeveloped lots are zoned Primary/Secondary. Adjacent land to the west is currently U.S. Forest Service land soon to be annexed into the Town of Vail through the land exchange. This property is the proposed site of the Arosa/Garmisch Park and is proposed to be zoned Outdoor Recreation. Adjacent land to the east (lots 5 and 6) is currently zoned Primary/Secondary. The current use of this property is Sunlight North, a 9-unit residential complex. 2) Is the amendment preventing a convenient workable relationship with land uses consistent with municipal objectives. This rezoning allows for the development of six employee housing units, in a duplex and 4- plex formation. The provision of employee housing is a Town objective stated in the Land Use Plan and the Municipal Code. 2 3) Does the rezoning provide for the growth of an orderly viable community? The Town recognizes that a permanent, year-round population plays an important role in sustaining a healthy, viable community. To encourage employees to remain within the Town, the Town is taking an active step to provide quality housing for its workforce. Residential Cluster zoning allows for a clustered development of 6 units on these lots, increasing the area available for the neighborhood park. Staff believes the cluster approach for this land to be a more efficient and orderly approach to housing than development as single family and duplex homes. 4) Is the change consistent with the Land Use Plan? The following are goals and policies of the Land Use Plan staff believes are related to the proposed rezoning: 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.10 Development of Town owned lands by the Town of Vail (other than parks and open space) may be permitted where no high hazards exist, if such development is for public use. 1.11 Town owned lands shall not be sold to a private entity, long term leased to a public entity or converted to a private use without a public hearing process. 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.2 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions. 5.3 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. VAI LDATA\EVERYON E\PEC\MEM0S\99\AR0SA 3 Residential Cluster SECTION: 12-6E-1: Purpose 12-6E-2: Permitted Uses 12-6E-3: Conditional Uses 12-6E-4: Accessory Uses 12-6E-5: Lot Area And Site Dimensions 12-6E-6: Setbacks 12-6E-7: Height 12-6E-8: Density Control 12-6E-9: Site Coverage 12-6E-10: Landscaping And Site Development 12-6E-11: Parking 12-6E-1: PURPOSE: The Residential Cluster District is intended to provide sites for single-family, two-family, and multiple- family dwellings at a density not exceeding six (6) dwelling units per acre, together with such public facilities as may appropriately be located in the same district. The Residential Cluster District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with residential occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. 12-6E-2: PERMITTED USES: The following uses shall be permitted in the RC District: Multiple-family residential dwellings, including attached or row dwellings and condominium dwellings with no more than four (4) units in any new building. Single-family residential dwellings. Two-family residential dwellings. 12-6E-3: CONDITIONAL USES: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the RC District, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 12-14-18 of this Title. Dog kennel. Private clubs. Public buildings, grounds and facilities. Public or private schools. Public park and recreation facilities. Public utility and public service uses. Ski lifts and tows. Type III employee housing unit (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title. Type IV employee housing unit (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title. 12-6E-4: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the RC District: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accord with the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Title. Private greenhouses, tool sheds, playhouses, attached garages or carports, swimming pools, patios, or recreation facilities customarily incidental to single-family, two-family or low density multiple-family residential uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 4 12-6E-5: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, containing no less than eight thousand (8,000) square feet of buildable area. Each site shall have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area eighty feet (80') on each side within its boundaries. 12-6E-6: SETBACKS: In the RC District, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15'). 12-6E-7: HEIGHT: For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty feet (30'). For a sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty three feet (33'). 12-6E-8: DENSITY CONTROL: A. Gross Residential Floor Area: Not more than twenty five (25) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted for each one hundred (100) square feet of buildable site area; provided, however, that single-family and two-family dwelling units constructed in the Residential Cluster District shall be entitled to an additional two hundred twenty five (225) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) per constructed dwelling unit. Total density shall not exceed six (6) dwelling units per acre of buildable site area. B. Exemptions: All projects that have received final Design Review Board approval as of December 19, 1978, shall be exempt from the changes in this Section as long as the project commences within one year from the date of final approval. If the project is to be developed in stages, each stage shall be commenced within one year after the completion of the previous stage. 12-6E-9: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the total site area. 12-6E-10: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least sixty percent (60%) of each site shall be landscaped. 12-6E-11: PARKING: Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title. No parking shall be located in any required front setback area, except as may be specifically authorized in accordance with Chapter 17 of this Title. At least one parking space per dwelling unit shall be located within the main building or buildings or within an accessory garage whenever the development is reasonable and appropriate for the site and is required by the Design Review Board. 5 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION March 22, 1999 Minutes MEMBERS PRESENT:MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Greg Moffet Diane Golden Sybill Navis George Ruther John Schofield Ann Bishop Ludwig Kurz Allison Ochs Galen Aasland Judy Rodriguez Brian Doyon Tom Weber Public Hearinq 2:00 p.m. Greg Moffet called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a joint worksession with the Town Council to amend the Town's "Public Accommodation" Zone District, Chapter 7 and amendments to Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA), Town of Vail Municipal Code. Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George Ruther George Ruther gave an overview of the staff memo. Tom Braun, representing the applicant, said the purpose of the district was for short-term accommodation units. He said all the properties were SDD's already. Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowner's Association, suggested relative to Johannes proposal, there was more of an affinity between the Talisman, Austria Haus and Sonnenalp, than the Holiday Inn site. He said the Tivoli neighborhood did not want to change. He said however, that they wanted equal treatment with GRFA , but did not want commercial. He said he had no problem with on-street commercial, from pedestrian precincts, with no variable setbacks outside the pedestrian precincts. He said they wanted to preserve the character of the neighborhood. Greg Moffet suggested adding a conditional use to have it in keeping with the neighborhood. Jim Lamont said the setback issue does come into consideration with private property and should not be a variable issue, but on Town rights-of-ways there should be flexibility. Regarding impact fees, he said they had to be generally applied or have an overall impact fee ordinance so the suburbs and inner cities would get treated the same. He said public expenditures were being dealt with here. He suggested refining the language down, as it was obtuse. TOWNOFPAIL , Planning and Environmental Commission 1 Minutes March 22, 1999 Tom Weber asked if there was a need to go beyond what the Streetscape Master Plan mandated. Jim Lamont said, yes. He said there was only one property in Lionshead that was a PA and said To be careful careful in taking out a standard that was common to all zone districts. He said that this may not be the correct ordinance. He said the parking was critical because if it changed across the board, it would change the economics of redevelopment and the developers would need to know as soon as possible. He said he and Dave Corbin had talked to over 40 property owners, who agreed that the commercial area was failing, being dusty, dirty and loaded with delivery trucks. He said if the parking requirement was reduced, it would be a win/win situation. LODGING DEFINITION: Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. Bob Lazier, owner of the Tivoli Lodge and some commercial downtown, said the Town could use some new hotel rooms, but warned against stifling developers, as there was a huge need for 500-1000 beds. He said there appeared to be a movement towards the Holiday Inn site. He said we seem to be trying to put everything in a basket, so that all are treated equally, which is not necessary, as long as they are treated fairly. He said the character of Tivoli was very different from the economics of the Sonnenalp and that commercial was not needed, as it was walking distance to the Village. He said to put all public accommodations under one umbrella would be difficult. He said the height requirement of 48' limited the Tivoli. He said he was addressing this philosophically and advised not to get bogged down with specifics. Tom Weber said George was going in the right direction. Brian Doyon said it was in the right direction, but would like to see the duration of time for FFU's. George Ruther explained that there was a minimum 1 night ownership and a maximum of 1/12 1h night ownership. Brian Doyon said the FFU definition was his only concern. John Schofield suggested looking to the use definition of an accommodation unit vs. a dwelling unit. He said the short-term warm beds or the 70% use made sense, but he didn't know about enforcement, but to accomplish the objective of warm beds/short term, 70% was good. He asked if there was currently a 24-hr. desk requirement under lodges and if not it might be something to consider. He then asked if all the current accommodations in the PA Zone District had 24-hr. desks. He said this was focusing on the quality of the amenities, to recognize it as a lodge. He said the language was directed towards the use of the unit. Galen Aasland agreed with John that the purpose of the district was short-term units. He said the smaller hotels would potentially still work without a front desk and he was comfortable with the 70%, but there needed to be flexibility to encourage redevelopment. Greg Moffet said to add a provision that the number of AU's needed to be replaced. He said the 24-hr. desk was appropriate most of the time and that there was a difference between a front desk and a 24-hr. desk. Planning and Environmental Commission 2 Minutes March 22, 1999 Bob Lazier gave the Willows as an example of having a front desk. Greg Moffet suggested requiring people to keep beds in the live bed pool, but he wouldn't know how to enforce this. George Ruther stated that the FFU does not count towards the equivalency and asked how to ensure that these units would get used more like hotel rooms, rather than condos. Greg Moffet said that in no case could AU square footage be removed. He said there could be fewer larger units, as was one in the Austria Haus. George said this was an and/or situation with the property owner. REVIEW PROCESS: George Ruther gave an overview of the review process. Tom Braun suggested not fewer meetings ; just not 6-8 worksessions on the larger projects and to have projects finish out closer to where they would end up. Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. There were no public comments. Galen Aasland said he agreed with what the PEC talked about, and agrees to have adjacent property owners notified. He said he liked the format to deed restrict employee housing and would like to see some kind of scenario set up so as to not be a surprise to the developer. Tom Weber said it needed to get as close to a design-by-right process as possible. Brian Doyon agreed with Galen. He said the PEC would like to take some of the issues and make the decisions and not have to go to Council since they were planning issues. He does not like two groups reviewing requests. He then gave the example of the Austria Haus, with the PEC giving approval and Council turning it down. John Schofield said to refine it have zoning and design criteria so applications can go right to the DRB. He said if it went into setbacks, then it would need to go before the PEC. Greg Moffet said he preferred to see requests reviewed more closely to the GU process. He said everybody would benefit if a Council review was at their option. He said that developers now go thru the PEC and then have to start all over with worksessions with Council. He said he would like to see a list of factors that have to be considered, such as setbacks, etc., and if we could take mandatory Council review out of the process, then it would be streamlined. George Ruther summarized the PEC comments that if an applicant was not asking for any Deviation, he could go right to the DRB if all development standards were met. He said the minute they wanted to vary, the PEC kicks in. He said if the development standards were met, there seemed to be a clear path to move forward with the project. Tom Weber asked if there shouldn't be a development-by-right path. Greg Moffet said there were too many subjective factors for a build-by-right. Planning and Environmental Commission 3 Minutes March 22, 1999 Galen Aasland said for any major redevelopment, it was important for Council to have some review. Tom Weber said with a good zone you have a design-by-right path. George Ruther said in a GU zone, the underlying thread is that all the properties are unique, as all development standards are set by the PEC. Greg Moffet said the beauty of it was it doesn't have to overcome special privilege. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Tom Braun said Jim Lamont said to leave the EVHA property owners alone, as they didn't want to change. He said he was not advocating Jim's position. John Schofield said he didn't understand how someone wouldn't want to change to the new zoning. Brian Doyon agreed. Greg Moffet said Jim asked to include in the process a consideration of the characteristics of the neighborhood. George Ruther said it was already in the conditional use as a broad base. Greg Moffet said he suspected Jim was concerned about drawing night traffic to the base of the buildings in this neighborhood. He said we have a zone district that doesn't work, but we wanted to encourage redevelopment and not make the process so onerous that nobody will undertake it. George Ruther said we were not rezoning, just amending it and the goal of this project was to identity text amendments. He said we were creating PA 1-PA18 or creating a zone district unique to that parcel. He thought we might need to invite each property owner or have a representative sent to understand which way to go. Tom Braun showed a slide presentation. George Ruther said regarding GRFA, that the applicant has proposed to have it increased and the PEC would like to see it eliminated. Greg Moffet said, for the record, he just received proposed amendments to the PA Zone District. He then asked for any public comments. There were no public comments. Greg Moffet said he wanted to eliminate GRFA. John Schofield said he too wanted to eliminated GRFA, but with the DRB guidelines, he thought GRFA was justified. Tom Weber agreed, but asked if this should be treated like setbacks. Planning and Environmental Conunission 4 Minutes March 22, 1999 Galen Aasland said it was not appropriate to take GRFA out of one district. John Schofield said Gross "residential" is not talking about "accommodation." Greg Moffet said he would love to see a study of the short-term bed base over the last 20 years, as he could predict a drop of 60%. He said we needed a product to compete with Whistler, and everytime we add an artificial constraint, we lose that ability. Greg Moffet said that Council has stated that they don't want to eliminate GRFA. Tom Weber asked if 120% is enough to incent development, as the Town has identified that we need to increase GRFA. Greg Moffet said we are adding a 50% component and that this was as much push as you can get, or how much Council can get without getting screamed at. Tom Braun said it comes down to GRFA vs. common area. Galen Aasland said 120% is politically doable. George Ruther said density has been thrown out the door, as it was increasing the intensity of the use on the site. Greg Moffet said he was willing to recommend 120% to Council as a total package and guideline and you wouldn't need a compelling reason to go over GRFA with criteria, when demonstrating why. John Schofield said as long as Council knows that at least 3 of the PEC (John Schofield, Greg Moffet and Diane Golden)are in favor of doing away with GRFA. Tom Weber said why not keep it at 80% with the benefit of acquiring public benefits. Greg Moffet said you can't build anything with that and it then becomes artificial. George Ruther reminded the PEC that 120% would be our maximum, but to the developer it's the minimum and realizing this, he asked how flexible was it. Greg Moffet said if this provides incentive for redevelopment, then he wanted to see it. He said we were killing our economy and our public policy objective was for more live beds. SITE COVERAGE AND LANDSCAPING: Tom Weber said he didn't think we should go as high as CC1 and CC2. Tom Braun said it was a development driven decision and it came back to flexibility. He advised to give them the chance because everyone would benefit. Tom Weber said as long as 65% works well with 30% landscaping. Planning and Environmental Commission 5 Minutes March 22, 1999 Greg Moffet, using the Holiday House as an example, said maybe we should revisit the parking issue, as it related to AU's. George Ruther stated AU's required one space per unit. Tom Braun said the parking requirement fell apart for the lodges, as Lodges get dinged for the restaurants, etc. Greg Moffet said a lot of properties are surrounded by CC1 and that parking was prohibited in the CC1. He said we need to lighten up a lot on parking and maybe make it a flexible part of the process. Brian Doyon said to keep landscaping where it is. John Schofield said he would tend to keep landscaping in the 25%-30% range, rather than parking. Galen Aasland agreed with John. Greg Moffet said to treat this like it was a flexible criteria to be considered. George Ruther said a change was needed for the definition of an AU and DU. Greg Moffet said the consensus among the Board members was to treat FFU's like AU's, rather than DU's Tom Weber said a consideration for streetscape should be included. Galen Aasland said he was still concerned the unsolvable parking problem such as the maxed out Christiania and would like to see some of those properties be able to pay-in-lieu. George Ruther summarized to relieve applicant from requiring parking on-site. 2. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the consolidation of two dwelling units in the CC2 Zone District, located at 124 E. Meadow Drive / A portion of Lot 5E, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Alfredo L. Suarez, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith Architects Planner: Allison Ochs Tom Weber recused himself. Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. Greg Moffet asked for any public, applicant or Commission comments. There were no comments. John Schofield made a motion for approval. Brian Doyon seconded the motion. Planning and Environmental Commission 6 Minutes March 22, 1999 The motion passed by a vote of 4-0. 3. A request for a rezoning from Primary/Secondary Residential to Residential Cluster, located at 2497, 2487, 2485 and 2477 Garmisch Drive/ Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing #2. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. Galen Aasland stated for the record that he lived about 3 lots over from this property, but that he saw no conflict. Andy Knudtsen said he was no longer with the Town of Vail, but that the Town of Vail retained him to take two projects through the process. He said that the Town had explored how to make it all work and Council felt strongest that there be housing on one side of the site and the park on the other side of the site. He said there had been some compromise and the design worked best with the neighborhood and the topography. He said that 72% of homes in Vail were owned by second homeowners and Town would like to get more full time residents. Chas Bernhardt handed out a letter that explained how these parcels were purchased with RHETT funds. He stated at a recent neighborhood meeting of about 40 people, 38 were not in favor of this project. He said the risks of losing that RHETT fund was not worth the consequences. Karen Scheidegger, an owner of some lots in the vicinity, stated she was opposed to this as it was purchased with RHETT funds for a park. She said that had she known she could have built a cluster of townhomes when it was zoned Primary/Secondary, she would have and she asked why the Town was able to do this. Brian Doyon said the Town was downzoning and creating a park as well. Greg Moffet said he is concerned about the duration and strength of a deed restriction. Andy Knudtsen said the Town would retain ownership, which would strengthen the deed restriction. Tom Weber thanked the two public entries that made comments. He then said he was not informed or experienced regarding RHETT funds. George Ruther said Tom Moorhead would respond to the letter with the Town's stance in the matter. Greg Moffet said he had no authority to rezone. Tom Weber said the new zoning was consistent with what was happening over there and this was a very nice plan balancing the open space with the need for employee housing. Planning and Environmental Commission 7 Minutes March 22, 1999 Brian Doyon said he was at the neighborhood meeting and was familiar with the RHETT funds, but was concerned about the reimbursement of the taxes back to the taxpayer. He said he was in favor of this and if the 38 neighbors were opposed, they would have been at this meeting. Andy Knudtsen said they had documentation that 80% of the RHETT had been reimbursed back to the taxpayers. John Schofield said the public concern was a tax matter and this is not a PEC matter. He said Karen was concerned with downzoning. Karen Schdeigger stated it was not right to have a cluster development, when it was zoned Primary/Secondary. Allison Ochs stated that at Town meetings, the Town goals were to cluster. Galen Aasland responded to Karen Scheidegger to look at this lot as encumbered, s the Town owned the property underneath and adjacent to this was an SDD. He said the cluster was good for the neighborhood, as it was keeping the development in one small corner of the property and provided a huge amount of open space to the Town. Greg Moffet said this application clearly satisfied the finding the PEC is required to make. He said to those folks opposed to the Town developing their lands, to buy the land as a neighborhood and dedicate it to open space. He said he was in favor of deed covenants, but something stronger was needed to keep the open portion of the lots open. He suggested a condition be that the proportion of the parcel be dedicated to open space and have a conservation deed restriction placed on it, or something similar as it needed a very durable legal restriction. Andy Knudtsen suggested a condition requiring a vote of the public. John Schofield made a motion with the condition that Council use the strongest possible language to ensure that the park area remains as park land/open space and one option was to include it as Charter Open Space. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 4. A request for annexation and zoning of out door recreation of an unplatted portion of the SE IA SE IA SE 1/a SW t/a of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, generally located on the north side of Arosa Drive, and abutting Sunlight north to the east and Town Manager's house to the west. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs gave an overview of the staff memo. Andy Knudtsen said this went hand in hand with the previous request. Planning and Environmental Commission 3 Minutes March 22, 1999 Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. There was no public comment. Karen Scheidegger asked if there was a guarantee that this land would be left open as open space. Allison Ochs said it would be rezoned outdoor recreation at this time, but could be rezoned in the future. Greg Moffet said we could include a condition making it Charter Open Space, which would require a vote of the public, to make sure it was kept a park. John Schofield made a motion for approval. Brian Doyon seconded the motion. John Schofield amended the motion add a condition that Council use the strongest possible language to ensure that the park area remains as park land/open space. One option was to include it as Charter Open Space. Brian Doyon seconded the amended motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 5. A request for a minor amendment to Special Development District No. 35, Austria Haus, to amend Section 6 of Ordinance #12, Series of 1997 to clarify a condition of the Ordinance, located at 242 E. Meadow Drive/ Part of Tract C, Block 5D, Vail Village 1St Filing. Applicant: Bill Sullivan, representing the Austria Haus Development Group Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL APRIL 12, 1999 6. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion to the Dobson Ice Arena, located at 321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Recreation District Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL APRIL 12, 1999 7. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for an encroachment into the required side setbacks, located at 3003 Bellflower Drive / Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Mr. Guillermo Huerta Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL APRIL 26, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission 9 Minutes March 22, 1999 8. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20% and a variance from Section 12-6D-6 (Front Setbacks) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for an encroachment into the front setback on a Primary/Secondary Residential zoned lot, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED INDEFINITELY Tom Weber made a motion to table the above items. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. Galen Aasland made a motion to table item #8 until April 12`h John Schofield seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 9. Information Update 10. Approval of March 8, 1999 minutes. Brian Doyon abstained and John Schofield had corrections. John Schofield made a motion for approval as amended. Tom Weber seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. Chas Bernhardt read the RHETT ordinance . Greg Moffet explained "thereas" doesn't rule, but where it begins "Now therefore" does. Galen Aasland made a motion to adjourn. Brian Doyon seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m. Planning and Environmental Commission 10 Minutes March 22, 1999 Planning and Environmental Commission 11 Minutes March 22, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 3 Series of 1999 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, BY ADDING TWO NEW ZONE DISTRICTS AS CHAPTER 7H: LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 DISTRICT AND CHAPTER 71: LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 DISTRICT IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN; AMENDING CHAPTER 2, DEFINITIONS, SECTION 12-2- 2: DEFINITIONS; AMENDING CHAPTER 4, DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED, SECTION 12-4-1: DESIGNATED, BY ADDING LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 DISTRICT AND LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 DISTRICT; AMENDING CHAPTER 10, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING, SECTION 12-10-17: LEASING OF PARKING SPACES; AMENDING CHAPTER 10, OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING, SECTION 12-10-16: EXEMPT AREAS; PARKING FUND ESTABLISHED; AMENDING CHAPTER 13, EMPLOYEE HOUSING, SECTION 12-13-6: TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT; AMENDING CHAPTER 13, EMPLOYEE HOUSING, SECTION 12-13-7: TYPE IV EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT; AMENDING CHAPTER 14, SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, SECTION 12-14-19: SATELLITE DISH ANTENNAS; AMENDING CHAPTER 15, GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA, SECTION 12-15-3: DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND EXCLUSIONS, SECTION 12-15-2: GRFA REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE DISTRICT; AMENDING TITLE 12 SIGN REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 4, SIGN CATEGORIES, SECTION 11- 4A-1: SIGNS PERMITTED IN ZONING DISTRICTS; AND AMENDING TITLE 5, PUBLIC HELTH AND SAFETY, CHAPTER 1, PUBLIC NUISANCES, SECTION 5-1-7: NOISE PROHIBITED. WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to implement the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, adopted by the Town on December 15, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District and the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Town's Land Use Plan, and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of these new zone districts at its February 22, 1999 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend said Chapter and Sections of the Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Title 12, Chapter 7, adding new Article H. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, to read as follows: ARTICLE H. LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 (LMU-1) DISTRICT SECTION: 12-7H-1: Purpose 12-7H-2: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement Or Garden Level: 12-71-1-3: Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor Or Street Level: 12-71-1-4: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second Floor and Above: 12-71-1-5: Conditional Uses; Generally 12-71-1-6: Accessory Uses 12-7H-7: Exterior Alterations Or Modifications 12-71-1-8: Compliance Burden 12-7H-9: Lot Area and Site Dimensions 12-7H-10: Setbacks 12-7H-11: Height and Bulk 1 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 I 12-71-11-12: Density (dwelling units per acre) 12-7H-13: Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) 12-71-11-14: Site Coverage 12-71-11-15: Landscaping and Site Development 12-7H-16: Parking and Loading 12-7H-17: Location Of,Business Activity 12-71-11-18: Mitigation of Development Impacts 12-7H-1: PURPOSE: The Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings; lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, timeshares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. This district is meant to encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. This zone district was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop. The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create a economically vibrant lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The incentives in this zone district include increases in allowable gross residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the incentives is to create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help finance public off-site improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. With any development/redevelopment proposal taking advantage of the incentives created herein, the following amenities will be evaluated: streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements. 12-7H-2: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; BASEMENT OR GARDEN LEVEL: A. Definition: The "basement" or "garden level" shall be defined as that floor of a building that is entirely or substantially below grade. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure: Banks and financial institutions. Commercial ski storage. Eating and drinking establishments. Public or private lockers and storage. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Major arcade. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 2 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 12-7H-3: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building that is located at grade or street level along a pedestrian way. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level within a structure: Banks, with walkup teller facilities. Eating and drinking establishments. Recreation facilities. Retail stores and establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level floor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Financial institutions, other than banks. Barbershops, beauty shops and beauty parlors. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-7H-4: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; SECOND FLOOR AND ABOVE: A. Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on those floors above the first floor within a structure: Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on second floors and higher above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Banks and financial institutions. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Eating and drinking establishments. Liquor stores. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Timeshare units'and fractional fee clubs. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 3 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 12-71-1-5: CONDITIONAL USES; GENERALLY (on all levels of a building or outside of a building): , The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional.. use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 12-14-18 of this Title. Brew pubs. Coin-operated laundries. Commercial storage. Public or private parking lots. Public buildings, grounds, and facilities. Public park and recreation facilities. Public utility and public service uses. Private outdoor recreation facilities, as a primary use. Ski lifts and tows. Television stations. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-1-6: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Title. Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to permitted and conditional uses. Minor arcade. Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and drinking establishments. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential or lodge uses. Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12-71-1-7: EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS: Review Required: The construction of a new building or the alteration of an existing building shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board in accordance with Chapter 12-11 of the Zoning Regulations. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units, fractional fee club units, timeshare units, any project which adds more than 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area or common space, or any project which has substantial off-site impacts (as determined by the Administrator) shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission as a Major Exterior Alteration in accordance with this Chapter and Section 12-3-6: Hearings. Any project which requires a conditional use permit shall also obtain approval of the Planning and Environmental Commission in accordance with Chapter 12-16 of the Zoning Regulations. Complete applications for major exterior alterations shall be submitted in accordance with administrative schedules developed by'the Community Development Department for Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board review. The following submittal items are required: 1. Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building or the building owner's authorized agent or representative on a form provided by the Administrator. Any application for condominiumized buildings shall be authorized by the condominium association in conformity with all pertinent requirements of the condominium association's declarations. 2. Application; Contents: An application for an exterior alteration shall include the following: a. Completed application form, filing fee, and a list of all owners of property located adjacent to the subject parcel. The owners list shall include the names of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property owned by each, and a general description of the property (including the name of the property, if applicable), and the name and mailing address of the condominium association's representative (if applicable). Said names and addresses shall be 4 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 obtained from the current tax records of Eagle County as they appeared not more than thirty (30) days prior to the application submittal date. b. A written statement describing the proposal and how the proposal complies with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and any other relevant sections of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. c. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on the property including the location of improvements, topography, and natural features. d. A current title report to verify ownership, easements, and other encumbrances, including Schedules A and B3. e. Existing and proposed site plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a vicinity plan at an appropriate scale to adequately show the project location in relationship to the surrounding area, a landscape plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a roof height plan and existing and proposed building elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equals one foot (1/8" = 1'). The material listed above shall include adjacent buildings and improvements as necessary to demonstrate the project's compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. f. Sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fall equinox (March 21/September 23) and winter solstice (December 21) at ten o'clock (10:00) A.M. and two o'clock (2:00) P.M. unless the Department of Community Development determines that the proposed addition has no impact on the existing sun/shade pattern. The following sun angle shall be used when preparing this analysis: _ Spring/Fall Equinox Sun Angle 10:00 A.M. 40° east of south, 50° declination 2:00 P.M. 42° west of south, 50° declination Winter Solstice Sun Angle 10:00 A.M. 30° east of south, 20° declination 2:00 P.M. 30° west of south, 20° declination g. Existing and proposed floor plans at a minimum scale of one-fourth inch equals one foot (1/4" = 1') and a square footage analysis of all existing and proposed uses. h. An architectural or massing model of the proposed development. Said model shall include buildings and major site improvements on adjacent properties as deemed necessary by the Administrator. The scale of the model shall be as determined by the Administrator. i. Photo overlays and/or other graphic material to demonstrate the special relationship of the proposed development to adjacent properties, public spaces, and adopted views per Chapter 22 of this Title. j. Parking needs assessment and vehicular circulation analysis, prepared by a qualified professional. k. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Administrator or the Town Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). The Administrator or the Planning and Environmental Commission may, at his/her or their discretion, waive certain submittal requirements if it is determined that the requirements are not relevant to the proposed development nor applicable to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 4. Work Sessions/Conceptual Review: If requested by either the applicant or the Administrator, submittals may proceed to 'a work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission, a conceptual review with the Design Review Board, or a worksession with the Town Council. 5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission shall be held in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of this Title. The Planning and Environmental 5 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 Commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with conditions or modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council in accordance with Section 12-3-3. of this Title. 6. Lapse Of Approval: Approval of an exterior alteration as prescribed by this Article shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of approval by the Design Review Board unless, prior to the expiration, a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued to completion. Administrative extensions shall be allowed for reasonable and unexpected delays as long as code provisions affecting the proposal have not changed. 12-7H-8: COMPLIANCE BURDEN: It shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed exterior alteration or new development is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative affects on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. 12-71-1-9: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of buildable area. 12-7H-10: SETBACKS: The minimum building setbacks shall be ten feet (10') unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan as a build-to line. 12-7H-11: HEIGHT AND BULK: Buildings shall have a maximum average. building height of 71' with a maximum height of 82.5', as further defined by the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. All development shall comply with the design guidelines and standards found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Flexibility with the standard, as incorporated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, shall be afforded to redevelopment projects which meet the intent of design guidelines, as reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 12-7H-12: DENSITY (dwelling units per acre): URIeSS s spat #+ed in the WeRshead Redevelopment ar Plcn, natMOre thaR Up to a 33% increase over the existing number of dwelling units on a property or 35 dwelling units per acre, whichever is greater shall be allowed. For the purpose of calculating density, employee housing units, accommodation units, timeshare units, and fractional fee club units shall not be counted as dwelling units. Additionally, a lodge dwelling unit, as defined herein, shall be counted as 25% of a dwelling unit for the purpose of calculating density. 12-7H-13: GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA): Unless ethepNise d in th 3r t k c than Up to 250 sq. ft. of gross residential floor area shall be allowed for each 100 sq. ft. of buildable site area, or an increase of 33% over the existing GRFA found on the property, whichever is greater. Multiple-family dwelling units in this zone district shall not be entitled to additional Gross Residential Floor Area under the 250 Ordinance, Section 12-15-5, of the Municipal Code. 12-7H-14: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total site area, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 12-7H-15: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least twenty percent (20%) of the total site area shall be landscaped, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 6 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 12-7H-16: PARKING AND LOADING: Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title. At least one-half (1/2) the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings. 12-7H-17: LOCATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: A. Limitations; Exception: All offices, businesses and services permitted by zone district, shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted unenclosed parking or loading areas, the outdoor display of goods, or outdoor restaurant seating. B. Outdoor Displays: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by outdoor display. 12-7H-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS: Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts of their development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation shall bear a reasonable relation to the development impacts. Impacts may be determined based on reports prepared by qualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public amenity improvements shall be balanced with the goals of redevelopment and will be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission in review of development projects and conditional use permits. Mitigation of impacts may include, but is not limited to, the following: roadway improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, stream tract/bank improvements, public art improvements, and similar improvements. The intent of this section is to only require mitigation for large scale redevelopment/development projects which produce substantial off-site impacts. Section 2. Title 12, Chapter 7, adding new Article I. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, to read as follows: ARTICLE I. LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 (LMU-2) DISTRICT SECTION: 12-71-1: Purpose 12-71-2: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement Or Garden Level: 12-71-3: Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor Or Street Level: 12-71-4: Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second Floor and Above: >,12-71-5: Conditional Uses; Generally 12-71-6: Accessory Uses 12-71-7: Exterior Alterations Or Modifications 12-71-8: Compliance Burden 12-71-9: Lot Area and Site Dimensions 12-71-10: Setbacks 12-71-11: Height and Bulk 12-71-12: Density (dwelling units per acre) 12-71-13: Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) 12-71-14: Site Coverage 12-71-15: Landscaping and Site Development 12-71-16: Parking and Loading 12-71-17: Location Of Business Activity 12-71-18: Mitigation of Development Impacts 12-711: PURPOSE: The Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, timeshares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, light industrial activities, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards.. This district is meant to encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead 7 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 Redevelopment Master Plan. This zone district was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop. The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create a economically vibrant lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The incentives in this zone district include increases in allowable gross residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the incentives is to create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help finance public, off-site, improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. Public amenities which will be evaluated with redevelopment proposals taking advantage of the incentives created herein may include: streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements. 12-71-2: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; BASEMENT OR GARDEN LEVEL: A. Definition: The "basement" or "garden level" shall be defined as that floor of a building that is entirely or substantially below grade. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure: Banks and financial institutions. Commercial ski storage. Eating and drinking establishments. Public or private lockers and storage. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Conference facilities and meeting rooms. - Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Major arcade. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-3: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building that is located at grade or street level along a pedestrian way. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level within a structure: Banks, with walkup teller facilities. Eating and drinking establishments. Recreation facilities. Retail stores and establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 8 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level floor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Financial institutions, other than,.banks. Barbershops, beauty shops and beauty parlors. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Additional uses determined toibe similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-4: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; SECOND FLOOR AND ABOVE: A. Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on those floors above the first floor within a structure: Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type III (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-6 of this Title and Type IV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 of this Title). Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on second floors and higher above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Banks and financial institutions. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Eating and drinking establishments. Liquor stores. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Timeshare units and fractional fee clubs. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-5: CONDITIONAL USES; GENERALLY (on all levels of a building or outside of a building): The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 12-14-18 of this Title. Brew pubs. Coin-operated laundries. Commercial storage. Gasoline and service stations. Public or private parking lots' Public buildings, grounds, and facilities. Public park and recreation facilities: Public utility and public service uses. Private outdoor recreation facilities, as a primary use. Ski lifts and tows. Television stations. 9 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 Vehicle maintenance, service, repair, storage, and fueling. Warehousing. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-71-6: ACCESSORY USES: The following, accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Title. Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to permitted and conditional uses. Minor arcade. Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and drinking establishments. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential or lodge uses. Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and , necessary for the operation thereof. 12-71-7: EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS: Review Required: The construction of a new building or the alteration of an existing building shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board in accordance with Chapter 12-11 of the Zoning Regulations. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units, fractional fee club units, timeshare.units, any project which adds more than 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area or common space, or any project which has substantial off-site impacts (as determined by the Administrator) shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission as a Major Exterior Alteration in accordance with this Chapter and Section 12-3-6: Hearings. Any project which requires a conditional use permit shall also obtain approval of the Planning and Environmental Commission in accordance with Chapter 12-16 of the Zoning Regulations. Complete applications for major exterior alterations shall be submitted in accordance with administrative schedules developed by the Community Development Department for Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board review. The following submittal items are required: 1. Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building or the building owner's authorized agent or representative on a form provided by the Administrator. Any application for condominiumized buildings shall be authorized by the condominium association in conformity with all pertinent requirements of the condominium association's declarations. 2. Application; Contents: An application for an exterior alteration.shall include the following: a. Completed application form, filing fee, and a list of all owners of property located adjacent to the subject parcel. The owners list shall include the names of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property owned by each, and a general description of the property (including the name of the property, if applicable), and the name and mailing address of the condominium association's representative (if applicable). Said names and addresses shall be obtained from the current tax records of Eagle County as they appeared not more than thirty (30) days prior to the application submittal date. b. A written statement describing the proposal and how the proposal complies with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and any other relevant sections of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. c. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on the property including the location of improvements, topography, and natural features. d. A current title report to verify ownership, easements, and other encumbrances, including Schedules A and B3. e. Existing and proposed site plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet 10 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 (1" = 20'), a vicinity plan-at'an appropriate scale to adequately show the project location in relationship to the surrounding area, a landscape plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a roof height plan and existing and proposed building elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equals one foot (1/8" = 1'). The material listed above shall include adjacent buildings and improvements as necessary to demonstrate the project's compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. f. Sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fall equinox (March 21/September 23) and winter solstice (December 21) at ten o'clock (10:00) A.M. and two o'clock (2:00) P.M. unless the Department of Community Development determines that the proposed addition has no impact on the existing sun/shade pattern. The following sun angle shall be used when preparing this analysis: Spring/Fall Equinox Sun Angle 10:00 A.M. 40' east of south, 50' declination 2:00 P.M. , 42' west of south, 50' declination Winter Solstice Sun Angle 10:00 A.M. 30' east of south, 20' declination 2:00 P.M. 30' west of south, 20'.declination g. Existing and proposed floor plans at a minimum scale of one-fourth inch equals one foot (1/4" = 1') and a square footage analysis of all existing and proposed uses. h. An architectural or massing model of the proposed development. Said model shall include buildings and major site improvements on adjacent properties as deemed necessary by the Administrator. The scale of the model shall be as determined by the Administrator. i. Photo overlays and/or other graphic material to demonstrate the special relationship of the proposed development to adjacent properties, public spaces, and adopted views per Chapter 22 of this Title. j. Parking needs assessment and vehicular circulation analysis, prepared by a qualified professional. k. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the' Administrator or the Town Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). The Administrator or the Planning and Environmental Commission may, at his/her or 'their discretion, waive certain submittal requirements if it is determined that the requirements are not relevant to the proposed development nor applicable to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 4. Work Sessions/Conceptual Review: If requested by either the applicant or the Administrator, submittals may proceed to a work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission, a conceptual review with the Design Review Board, or a worksession with the Town Council. 5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission shall be held in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of this Title. The Planning and Environmental Commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with conditions or modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council in accordance with Section 12-3-3 of this Title. 6. Lapse Of Approval: Approval of an exterior alteration as prescribed by this Article shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of approval by the Design Review Board unless, prior to the expiration, a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and diligently pursued to completion. Administrative extensions shall be allowed for reasonable and unexpected delays as long as code provisions affecting the proposal have not changed. 12-71-8: COMPLIANCE BURDEN: 11 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 It shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed exterio(alteration or new development is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead. Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative affects on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of.the Vail Comprehensive Plan. 12-71-9: LOT AREA AND SITE DIMENSIONS: The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of buildable area. 12-71-10: SETBACKS: The minimum building setbacks shall be ten feet (10') unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan as a build-to line: 12-71-11: HEIGHT AND BULK: Buildings shall have a maximum average building height of 71' with a maximum height of 82.5', as further defined by the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. All development shall comply with the design guidelines and standards found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Flexibility with the standard, as incorporated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, shall be afforded to redevelopment projects which meet the intent of design guidelines, as reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 12-71-12: DENSITY (dwelling units per acre): URIess theFw+sespeEi#ied `.n ;ha-L onshaad RedevelGIam3nt N%ste -Plan, not m9fe the Up to a 33% increase over the existing number of dwelling units on a property or 35 dwelling units per acre, whichever is greater shall be allowed. For the purpose of calculating density, employee housing units, accommodation units, timeshare units, and fractional fee club units shall not be counted as dwelling units. Additionally, a lodge dwelling unit, as defined herein, shall be counted as 25% of a dwelling unit for the purpose of calculating density. '12-71-13: GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA): i7Y1 ass 9therwise spaAied ir h cr P; of =3- %as Up to 250 sq. ft. of gross residential floor area shall be allowed for each 100 sq. ft. of buildable site area, or an increase of 33% over the existing GRFA found on the property, whichever is greater. Multiple-family dwelling-units in this zone district shall not be entitled to additional Gross Residential Floor Area under the 250 Ordinance, Section 12-15-5, of the Municipal Code. 12-71-14: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total site area, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 12-71-15: LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT: At least twenty percent (20%) of the total site area shall be landscaped, unless otherwise specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 12-71-16: PARKING AND LOADING: Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Title. At least one-half (2) the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings. 12-71-17: LOCATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: A. Limitations; Exception: All offices, businesses and services permitted by zone district, shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted unenclosed parking or loading areas, the outdoor display of goods, or outdoor, restaurant seating. B. Outdoor Displays: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed 12 Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 by outdoor display. 12-71-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS: Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts, of their development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation shall bear a reasonable relation to the development impacts. Impacts may be determined based on reports prepared by qualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public amenity improvements shall be balanced with the goals of redevelopment and will be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission in review of development projects and conditional use permits. Mitigation of impacts may include, but is not limited to, the following: roadway improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, stream tract/bank improvements, public art improvements, and similar improvements. The intent of this section is to only require mitigation for large scale redevelopment/development projects which produce substantial off-site impacts. Section 3. Title 12, Chapter 2, Section 12-2-2: Definitions, is hereby amended by adding the following definitions: Commercial Ski Storage: Storage for equipment (skis, snowboards, boots and poles) and/or clothing used in skiing-related sports, which is available to the public or members, operated by a business, club or government organization, and where a fee is charged for hourly, daily, monthly, seasonal or annual usage. Ski storage that is part of a lodge, or dwelling unit, in which a fee is not charged, is not considered commercial ski storage. Personal Services: A commercial business where a service is offered to the customer including beauty and barber shops, tailor shops, and similar services. Lodge dwelling unit: A small dwelling unit with limited kitchen and floor area and which contains 650 sq. ft. or less of floor area and is intended to be rented on a short term basis. Section 4. Title 12, Chapter 4, Section 12-4-1: Designated, is hereby amended to add the following zone districts: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District (LMU-1) Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District (LMU-2) - Section 5. Title 12, Chapter 10, Section 12-10-17: Leasing of Parking Spaces, is hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is see is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Modify B(1) as follows: B. - Lease Qualifications; Application To Lease: A parking space, spaces or areas may be leased by the owner, occupant or building manager thereof in accordance with the following: 1. Any owner, occupant or building manager who owns, occupies or manages ten (10) or more private parking spaces located in Commercial Core 1, Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodations. Lionshead Mixed Use 1. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 or special development zone districts and provides sufficient parking for use by employees may apply to the Administrator of the Town for a permit to lease parking spaces. Section 6. Title 12, Chapter 13, Section 12-13-6: Type III Employee Housing Unit and Section 12-13-7: Type IV Employee Housing Unit are hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is stricken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) . Section 12-13-6: Type III Employee Housing Unit Modify B(1 and 3) as follows (modify summary table as necessary): B. General Conditions: 13 Ordinance No. 3 , Series.of 1999 1. It shall be a conditional use in the Residential Cluster, Low Density Multiple- Family, Medium Density Multiple-Family, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodation, Commercial Core I, Commercial Core II, Commercial Core III, Commercial Service Center, Arterial Business District, Parking District, General Use, and Ski Base/Recreation Zone Districts. It shall be a permitted use in Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts. 3. It shall be counted as five-tenths (0.5) dwelling unit for the purposes of calculating density, unless located in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 or Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts. where it is not counted as densitv. The number of Type III employee housing units shall be determined by the Planning and, Environmental Commission as part of the conditional use permit review process set forth in Section 12-16-6,"Criteria; Findings" of this Title. if aDplicable. Section 12-13-7 Type IV Employee Housing Unit Modify B(1 and 3) as follows (modify summary table as necessary): B. General Conditions: 1. It shall be a conditional use in the Residential Cluster, Low Density Multiple- Family, Medium Density Multiple-Family, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodation, Commercial Core I, Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3, Commercial Service Center, Arterial Business District, Parking District, General Use, and Ski/Base Recreation Zone Districts. It shall be a Dermitted use in Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts. 3. It shall be counted as 0.333 of a dwelling unit for the purposes of calculating density, unless located in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 or Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts, where it is not counted as densitv. The number of Type IV employee housing units shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission as part of the conditional use permits review process set forth in Section 12-16-6 of this Title. if applicable. Section 7. Title 12, Chapter 14, Section 12-14-19: Satellite Dish Antennas, is hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is stFiGkeR is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Modify D(1)(i) as follows: D. Compliance With Requirements; Variance: 1. Requirements: Satellite dish antennas shall comply with the following requirements: I. Due to the special aesthetic importance of the core areas of the Town, exterior installations of satellite dish antennas in Commercial Cores 1, ai4d 2, Lionshead Mixed Use 1. and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts shall be permitted only if screened by some type of enclosing structure. Said structures required to enclose a satellite dish antenna in these areas shall comply with all applicable zoning regulations and shall be architecturally compatible with the existing structure. Section 8. Title 12, Chapter 15, Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements by Zone District and Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions, are hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is stFiGlien is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements by Zone District Modify by adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts to table as follows: GRFA Zone Districts Ratio/Percentage GRFA Credits LMU-1 Up to 250% of buildable lot area None Lionshead Mixed Use 1 LMU-2 Up to 250% of buildable lot area None 14 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 Lionshead Mixed Use 2 Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions Modify 2(b) as follows: Multiple-Family Structures: Within buildings containing more than two (2) allowable dwellings or accommodation units, the following additional areas shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. GRFA shall be calculated by measuring the total square footage of a building as set forth herein. Excluded areas as set forth shall then be deducted from the total square footage: a. Enclosed garages to accommodate on-site parking requirements. b. All or part of the following spaces, provided such spaces are common spaces. aad that thezetal squaFe footage of all the ~ollowing spaees hall not exceed thiFty five peFeent(35-%) of the allowable GRFA pwi:hitted on the let. tiara e# eveeeds the thirty . five peveen+ /Q~.O/) muximur~ :~,all t9 innli tloi-l in the nnIcul+' ~~u,i3e-e# GR€A. (1) Common hallways, stairways, elevator shafts and airlocks. (2) Common lobby areas. (3) Common enclosed recreation facilities. (4) Common: heating, cooling or ventilation systems, solar rock storage areas, or other mechanical systems. eale-ulatien as GR€Abe-the min:4:n;.im squur9-footage Fequifed te-al!E)w43r the main+, ora+.'. (5) Common closet and storage areas, providing access to such areas is from common hallways only. (6) Meeting and convention facilities. (7) Office space, provided such space is used exclusively for the management and operation of on-site facilities. (8) Floor area to be used in a Type III or a Type IV "Employee Housing Unit (EHU)" as defined and restricted by Chapter 13 of this Title, r'V ided said-EHIJ [Gar _sys shall not exeeed sib perGent O e"#e +.hirty five pereeRl (36-0K,) on area -!I ~wanap defiiRed above. Any square footage faF o Tyke III or Type-W E.91-16-w#iGh exeeed3 the pereent ,.r. ma,-Jmurn 9f allewed eomm&R af3a shall ba i-,,,ekHied in tha EaE :lutiae I If a prapet4y OWR3r allee tesz3mman ar #cusing, un`f subseq iently recl ies+s a eemm3n u°ea van nee, !he Town ohall xequire-that the-143-=ing a, eemman :sea aad tha"#e emp ayee housing uni±s be replaced w*th;R the Town. Section 9. Title 11, Chapter 4, Section 11-4A-1: Signs permitted in Zoning Districts, is hereby amended by adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts to the table in the same category which contains Commercial Core 2. Section 10... Title 5, Chapter 1, Section 5-1-7: Noise Prohibited, is hereby amended to read as follows: (Note: Text which is stFiekeR is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) Modify G(3)(b) as follows: G. Motor Vehicle Noise: b. Notwithstanding subsection G3a above, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit any idling whatsoever of the engine of any unattended bus, truck or any 15 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 motor vehicle, except for refrigeration vehicles, within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1. Lionshead Mixed Use 2. Commercial Core 1 or the Commercial Core 2 Zone Districts of the Town. Section 11. Title 12, Chapter 10, Section 12-10-16 (B): Exempt Areas; Parking Fund Establishment, is hereby amended as follows: (Note: Text which is s1Fie-kea is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.) B. Parking Fund: In Commercial Core 1, ai4d Commercial Core 2. and Lionshead Mixed Use 1. property owners or applicants shall be required to contribute to the Town Parking Fund, hereby established, for the purpose of meeting the demand and requirements for vehicle parking. At such time as any property owner or other applicant proposes to develop or redevelop a parcel of property within an exempt area which would require parking and/or loading areas, the owner or applicant shall pay to the Town the parking fee hereinafter required. Section 12. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 13. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 14. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. ' Section 15. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 16th day of March, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 6th day of April, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 6th day of April, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk 16 Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 4 Series of 1999 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 5, ZONING MAP; REZONING PARCELS OF LAND IN THE LIONSHEAD AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED MAP TO LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 DISTRICT AND LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 DISTRICT; AND REZONING TRACT E AND THE LIONSHEAD PARKING STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED MAP TO GENERAL USE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to implement the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, adopted by the Town on December 15, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, and the General Use District, in accordance with the attached map, are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Town's Land Use Plan, and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of these zoning map amendments (in accordance with the attached map) at its February 22, 1999 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend the official Town of Vail Zoning Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT,ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail is hereby amended as follows: The Lionshead area shall be rezoned to Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District in accordance with the attached map. Additionally, Tract E and the Lionshead parking structure shall be rezoned to General Use District in accordance with the attached map. Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and. the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999 1 Section 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 2nd day of March, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 16th day of March, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 16th day of March, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1999 2 LIONSHEAD REZONINGS Proposed General Use Distric Proposed Lionshead Mixed-Use 1 gistri _ \ , YANTAGPOIN TRA O PARKING STRUCTURE VAIL INTERNATION WINOS 395 :'N DAY ::546::::.:::::::::: - 300 .LIONS P G'LCT.::.:' PRIDE::... Proposed Lionshead ; . vAl7 504:: vAIL'1 Mixed-Use 2 District 70 LA RC LIPTMOUSE::521::. E/wi nnanewCEARENA ..:LI SHElV]1 N::: 8. ...555 ....:......705 321 LPNSw-AP: ~ •450 ..616:.: ACT':: ARCADE. 390 EN21AN; :SU ,BIRq': LODGEAT VAILVALLEYM ICAL 7.. 0~1: 'TREETOP. LIONSHEAD CENTER ...::VAIL SPA::::.:..... ...........675: 45 MONTANEROS LIBRARY 191 261 , : G '.:684::: 11CENTERD 292 MRRRIOT 2 LION$':SOUAR~ . .:::..5 / ii5..:. wFSTMFgSa TRACT D::..:: / wOR. VA13 4;tjG{I;'r, \ UON'SSOUpRE •:560::::.. . h4UWT:;6HOP:;!; GOND ' ~ DAY LOT:':. ~ .:'ANTLERS.:::.. A......... .......B........ .I?A: A PLANT ER KIER BRIDGE Parcels TRACTC 646 LJ Proposed General Use District 3i 890 Proposed Lionshead Mixed-Use 1 District Proposed Lionshead Mixed-Use 2 District N ~V Gore Creek k 4 Y ?N fig, y~ S The Properties outlined on this map = are proposed to be rezoned TOR OF 6'~IL Deptd Cam =4 Dndymmt ORDINANCE NO. 5 Series of 1999, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 4, SECTION 3-4-1 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TO REMOVE PLANNING AND ENVRIONMENTAL COMMISSION REPRESENTATION ON THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended that the Planning and Environmental Commission representation on the Design Review Board be removed; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers the amount of time necessary for a Planning and Environmental Commissioner to attend both the Planning and Environmental Commission meetings and the Design Review Board meetings as excessive and difficult for working professionals to attend. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Title 3, Chapter 4, Section 3-4-1 of the Municipal Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: There is established a Design Review Board (DRB) of the Town. The Design Review Board shall be composed of five (5) members. Each member shall be a resident of the Town, and appointed by the Town Council. Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 16th day of March, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 6th day of April, 1999, in the Council Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1999 1 Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 6th day of April, 1999. Robert E. Ford, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1999 2 u ~y TOWN OF VAIL •R Office of the Town Manager CHAMPIONSHIPS 75 South Frontage Road 1999-VAIL-BEAVER CREEK Vail, Colorado 81657 , . , , 970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 TM MEMORANDUM TO Vail Town Council FROM: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager DATE: April 2, 1999 SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report Ford Park Maintenance We are beginning this week to work to restore the surface at the lower bench of Ford Park. As you will recall, this area was used for the stadium in which opening ceremonies were held. We anticipate a complete renovation to be complete in June. We are also planning to reconstruct the children's playground area. The playground rehab work will occur independently and will be finished later than the sod work. We are working to put together some creative ideas and will bring a proposal to the Council for your consideration sometime in April. Lionsridae Loon The plan specifications and contract documents for the Lionsridge Loop street reconstruction project are complete. The plans have been made available to contractors for bid. The bid opening is scheduled for April 22. However, given the current financial state of the season, we will evaluate the bids once they have been opened and make a recommendation to the Council as to whether this project should proceed. If the project does proceed, construction will begin in May and should be complete by July. Public Works Director Search We received approximately 75 applications for the Public Works Director position. We have narrowed this field to approximately 20. At this time the remaining 20 applicants are completing a series of questions that will allow us to better understand their technical abilities, organizational skills as well as communications abilities. Following a review of the questionnaires the field will be narrowed to 6 to 8 and we will conduct on-site interviews. It is my hope to have this position filled no later than June. RECYCGEDPAPER Emnlovee Forums . As we prepare to go forward with the difficult budget work in the coming months, I have scheduled a series of meetings with the Town employees. These meetings will be held on April 5t" (10:00 to 11:30 and 12:30 to 2:00) in the Town Council Chambers and April 15th (8:00 to 9:30 and 3:30 to 5:00) in the Public Works conference room. These meetings will provide an opportunity to present our current situation and to answer questions our employees may have. If you are interested in attending one of these sessions please let me know. For your information I have attached a draft agenda for these sessions. New Street Sweeter We are currently evaluating the possibility of leasing (with an option to purchase) a second street sweeper. This would double our capacity to clean the 75 lane miles of streets in the Town of Vail. I will be prepared to discuss this item with you in more detail on Tuesday in order to determine if you wish us to continue to evaluate this matter. UPCOMING MEETINGS 4/13/99 WS PEC/DRB Review Discuss Ord No. , re: SDD 47, Marriott 4/20/99 WS Greg Hall - 10 year anniversary discussion of Ord , re: SDD #4, Westhaven Condos 4/20/99 TC 1st read Ord , re: SDD#4, Westhaven Condos 2"a read Ord No. 7, annexing Arosa/Garmisch 2"a read Ord No. 8, zoning annexed Arosa/Garmisch 2 "a read Ord No. 9, rezoning 4 tracts re: Arosa/Garmisch TOWN OF VAIL All Employee Forum April 5, 1999 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT SITUATION (State of TOV) a. Accomplishments i. Ski Championships ii. Villiage Improvements iii. Radio System iv. Consolidation of Public Safety Communication V. Housing Implementation vi. Lionshead Master Plan b. Season to date (financial update) i. Sales tax update ii. Skier Days/Lift Tax 3. FISCAL YEAR 2000 BUDGET UPDATE a. Hiring Freeze b. Discuss Problem C. Review Time line d. Discuss opportunities for employee involvement e. Final Say 4. REVIEW STRATEGIC INTENT a. Review Mission/Vision/Values b. Review Critical Strategies i. Economic Viability ii. Housing iii. Transportation iv. Infrastructure V. Community Collaboration C. Review Capital/RETT Budgets ~y TOWN OF VAIL ~ Department of Public Works & Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive ' Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2158 /Fax: 970-479-2166 TM Vail Village Construction Hours for 1999 Problem Statement Vail Village is an invaluable asset to the community. Thousands of people come to the village each summer to sightsee, recreate, shop and enjoy Vail. The community and merchants rely upon the summer tourism to generate revenue. Our summer guests expect a pleasant experience while in Vail. . To insure that all of the proposed construction has as little negative impact on the community and on our guest as possible, the Town of Vail finds it imperative to create and implement the Vail Village Construction Master Plan. It would be irresponsible for the Town of Vail, the construction contractors and the merchants to not actively participate to minimize the impact of construction on the Village this summer. Givens The following givens are intended to provide the basic foundation by which construction will be completed in the Village: • The public's health, safety and welfare shall be honored at all times. • Adequate pedestrian, I oading/del i very, vehicle, and emergency vehicle access and circulation shall be maintained. • Roadways and pedestrian walkways shall be kept clean and free of dirt and debris. • The hours of construction activity shall be as follows: - April 15 - June I I & September 7 - November 19, 7 a.m. until 7 p.m., seven days a week - June 11 - September 7, 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. Monday through Thursday, 7: 00a.m. Until 4:00 p.m. On Friday - No construction activity shall occur on Saturday or Sunday between June 12 & September 7 - No construction activity shall occur on the following dates: Saturday, May 29, Sunday, May 30 and Monday, May 31 (Memorial Day) Saturday, July 3, Sunday, July 4,(Independence Day) and Monday, July 5 ~a RECYCLEDPAPER u TOWN OF VAIL Department of Public Works & Transportation WORLD 1309 Elkhorn Drive C HAM • Dail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2158 /Fax: 970-479-2166 TM Saturday, September 4, Sunday, September 5, and Monday, September 6 (Labor Day) Saturday, September, 18 and Sunday, September 19 (October Fest) Thursday, November 25, (Thanksgiving Day) Friday, November 26, Saturday, November 27 and Sunday, November 28 Deliveries shall be restricted into the Village from 7 a.m. until 11:30 a.m. Special delivery permits must be requested in advance, from Public Works in conjunction with Code Enforcement at Checkpoint Charlie. • The Town of Vail Noise Ordinance has been waived by the Town Manager from 7a.m. - 7p.m. for construction activities from April 15 through June 14, and from September 7 through November 19. The Noise Ordinance shall be in effect and strictly regulated from June 15 through September 7. • The Town of Vail will not allow loud music at any construction site. • All construction sites will be required to obtain an approved construction-staging plan from the Town of Vail Public Works Department. • The Town of Vail reserves the right to amend the Vail Village Construction Plan regulations at anytime should abuses or problems arise. Exnectations The following expectations are established to insure the success of the Vail Construction Master.Plan: • Full and complete cooperation of all the interested parties. • Strict adherence and compliance with the requirements outlined in the construction plan. • Respect and consideration for the affected interests and parties. RECYCLED PAPER ~4 % TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 29, 1999 Contact: Gary Goodell, 479-2321 TOV Chief Building Official TOV HOSTS OPEN HOUSE APRIL 5-7 FOR SPRING CONSTRUCTION KICKOFF (Vail)--The Town of Vail will host its spring construction kickoff from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. April 5-7 with an open house featuring refreshments, door prizes, as well as information on building code updates and other tips on Vail's building procedures. The event is sponsored by the Building Safety and Inspection Services Division of the Town of Vail Community Development Department in recognition of International Building Safety Week. Architects, business owners, residents, contractors, developers, engineers, homebuilders and others interested in residential or commercial construction in Vail are encouraged to stop by. The activities will take place in the Community Development Department building at 75 S. Frontage Rd. In addition to the three-day open house, town staff will host a free luncheon from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on April 6. Door prize giveaways will include a 1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 1, valued at $50; code check guides for safe houses, a $15 value; computer mouse pads; and a Contractor's Index to the 1997 Uniform Building Code, a $26 value. For more information, call the Community Development Department at 479-2139. RECYCLED PAPER as. a a ra t v ~ ~ i a rl o ru' 1 "3iO 35ya S+R9"1 f"`~ a 7~ 1 f r pi~L?$ 1 _ ~`3 7;~17W ftVti?t 7 1, t \ sr a•j ri 1 IL 11; Yf S* i ~LIj1(' g'j r.,< *1 d'\- ? , " r F ~ ~ L iii svsra~55a,r~ 1~" ~'`a s ',7 -1177 Mil ter-: s C .MV117 3 ta'gn( 'a S`durid I pnoq d/ 121 d!; a^ SM1171 ?1 03 - ' J C6 11D --oL it 1 144 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203-2207 Rob FORD MAR 2 4 1999 MAYOR 75 5 FRONTAGE RD W wo" co 81557-0000 ?x e C SPRING 1999 OUTREACH T MEETINGS: YOUR LOCAL SOURCE 03F II (FORMATION: a gt a (a am n c h a m Northeast ` ,z' Brush 1~ y S 7 k Ason (Fireside Room) <`Tuesday,,ApnV13 ~p x ~n ~ ~ Carroll Hotel; -41-8'E NortliFronf Range r r , ryBeltl]OU~d 2n }t~ The Colorado NluniciPal League is pleased to Berthoud Community Center, 248 Welch Ave <a XWednesday, '~°pnl 1'4 f t a a at tyrya<° present its 1999 schedule of Spring Outreach - Moii itain G e Q 4 h; Fresco ~j ~ ~ ' S fi ~K meetings. z n TownHall (Council Chambers}, 1 •Mam St ~t Thursday, .4pn1,15 ~4 ~ Held for the first time in 1998, these meetings youth Central Alanosa M a" proved popular with municipal elected officials Alamosa City Ha"!H 0 ounctl Chambers) a" + Monday, April 14 and staff all over the state. tf. 425 4th St ~ • , The entire program is designed to focus on the Southwest Hayfield Tuesda , Api120 y issues that mean the most to you and affect Bayfii Town Hall, ;1 1 W 1VhIl St your municipalities the most. This program West LL _ t ; Delta also provides current information on CML Heddles Recreation Center Wednesday, Apn12l. :i programs and activities. D~ X530 Gunnison lVVer'Dr r a The meetings take place in seven convenient Southeast La Ja<nta locations throughout Colorado so look for the rWoodruff Memorial Library • Friday, Apn123 ~ ~Y Ate' e one closest to you in the chart at right. 522 Coloradq`Ave: f Nortlwest yf Steamboat Springs h Come Join us for information, conversation and Howel'sen H"rll Lod e; Ol ra Hall u g ymp Tuesday, April 27~ , lunch. All you have to do is RsvP! fz y 4 i 845 Howelsen Parlc~vay gy u:wax ' The rragwa., F 91 WHEN IS THE MEETING:/ INTRODUCTIONS 7-j All 'meetings-take place from 1 1:30 a:ri 3 to' 1:30 p.m. CML . - --of attendees;"CML staff andlguests- will provide FREE LUNCH! - - - -SUMMARY - I-IOWMUCH? - ' of selected new laws and pending bills of particular All meetings are FREE: OF CHARCEI municipal interest Wn 'SHOULD-ATTE ID A _ ON THE I'IORIZON` - I Anyone is'-welcome . to,attend -,muni6pal; elected and A look at CiVIL's 77th Annual Conference and appointed officialsstaff.gnd guests upcoming scheduled workshops $~OW DO I SIGN UP? REVIEW Rsvp to`CML, (303 831-641f, , Rsvp s'are required three of imp rtant CML services=for members a' d= ? r t clays before 'the event;:Please:coordmate all your.Rsrvp's" _ -through the town manager or, clerk to, minimize phone calls. ,r y ROUND TABLE DISCUSSIONS ~-IELP US'GET THE WORD OUT ~of issues and activities in each municipality 1 This brochure-has been distributed to i` e mayor manager andf ' y' OPEN"I~ORUM ~c~erk _in-each; municipality: Please distnbute other copies to r 4 t on issues of interest to attendees other elected officials and staff. 'falt -L TOWN-OFVAIZ ll' mwct . ~ ~ . ResFc-nse Record J e ~7 • dtii;~ e.^. ~Ci 1?'...:: °-•:S rrV f~'~ tT re c-; v y by the Tort of Vai We e*tCJU.r?^~ Vyjj r_: ~c CGNL~.K; rS yyl~;1~, uut and we stnhle for tj=e?y.,,_ vases, y~ COQ'=I.:_ : 0;:~ Tp ~v fiVE WOfZ.~VGDhYS E 0 A -~i B~ NU.~~yE,~, R~I'Ut' i S -Z T, ~C d T"\ C 7 7 - L C:'- K y= X01\ r.07 A.~~v~ = i 7'n Tti jo it r - t L- EN ; r o Prim BR, 1. t~iairc~irr sad .ac i wiil . _.^.Sl ! GR pie at ~~e V Commv,.a.. %C • RECElVE® MAR 2 3 15Z DEAN O. MORTON 25857 WESTWIND WAY LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA 94022 March 18, 1999 TELEPHONE: (650) 941-2971 FACSIMILE: (650) 941-6243 Mayor Rob Ford Town Council c/o Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mayor Ford: My wife and I were in Vail recently at our condominium in Phase III of the Lodge at Lionshead. For sometime we have been concerned with the appearance of the east parking lot across from our building. We did send a letter of comment three or four years ago and received a nice note back saying that improvements were under consideration and we should look to better days ahead. We were subsequently encouraged also by the major renovation of the Vail parking structure and surroundings. However, things have only gotten worse. LaVon and I walked up to the lot and conditions up close are even more appalling than they appear from our bedroom and kitchen windows. RV's seem to be more or less permanently parked with engines that we can hear running at all hours. Construction vehicles, busses of all kinds make up the rest, except for the new addition of metal y~ seating structures - we guess left over from the World Cup events. May we suggest that some of the council members personally take a look at this mess. I have enclosed a picture of our view for documentation. This unfortunately was taken three years ago when things, by comparison to today, looked pretty good! This is a situation that the people in Vail residential areas wouldn't put up with for a minute. One suggestion for a quick improvement: put up a shielding fence. If the council really cares about Lionshead, this is something that can be corrected quickly without all the political processes of rezoning, etc. It might even make some of us more supportive and trusting with regard to the larger discussions of Lionshead redevelopment. Of course, the appearance of this lot is not just an offense to the Lodge at Lionshead residents; everybody walking by gets an impression of an unsightly, noisy and disorganized area that detracts from the pleasures of the Vail experience. I hope you can find the time to review this matter. Sincerely /J i I i I j Dean O. Morton encl.: ! cc: Jeff Bailey, General Manager, Lodge at Lionshead Kevin Foley, Vail Town Council Sk: i rVV rt '!Friday, March 26, 1999 iewsunn its deal with,early eat wave Ski re~s® ; de'synte neat ~ nt r what although spokesman Scott., fall'isdo this -about weekendemarksthe By.Steve Lipsher $KI from Page 1A Fortner said the slopes are slow average,, Denver Post Staff Writer i • „ and soft to the point that officials beginning of the end with the.three- tain. week, end-of-season "'Surf the Like the Wicked Witch of the West, Colo-' Vail alread is Baring down for are wooing beginners wanting to Rockies"' celebration that includes learn to. ski., a bikini slalom race and other, rites . its April 25 closure and announced sure does seem to . rado's ski resorts are melting. . meltingt will of spring. under a withering, early heat wave. Thursday that China. Bowl "Altitude "We're losing about an inch, inch-and-a- 1 close April 4 to allow crews to be- help, he said. "Today its definite- half a day," said Joan Christenson, spokes- gin work on rebuilding the Two Elk bottomnUp ontop, nt's still au natu- butiwe'rein a Christmas-type situ- ation as far as lodging :this week- . woman for Winter Park. "But we've still I i lod e, destroyed in October's arson it's not SOUPY." g ral. Its soft, but „ got something like a 5-foot base out there: attack. Althou h school spring breaks end, spokeswoman Virginia Ver- g And ...there are a few more storms out II "Everyone wants us to get Two said there."up and running, so we're have kept the resort busy, Front ney said. Unlike. the. situation at Throu hout the mountains in the ast i ?lk back Range skiers have been divided be- • many other Colorado 'resorts, this g p I It having to close the China Bowl ar- c~d year is shaping uPto be a record week, temperatures have climbed into the 1'ea a little earlier than usual," said tween basking in the lowlafs or, Y there, . 40s, 50s and even 60s - and nighttime I ; Paul Testwuide,~6hief operating of- heading to the hills for T-shir ski- sonsow bolstered bygood early-sea- 40s, in some cases haven't even reached ;Etter for the resort. g freezing -turning the slopes into slush g dates for the But coming on the heels of a For many skiers,,tim' however, and skiers to pull out the tan- Scheduled closin mild winter, the warm weather has springtime is the best time, when. prompting other Vail -owned resorts include hastened the end of the ski season. the sunshine turns skiing into: a., . weather sport. ning butter. ; April 18 for Beaver Creek, May 2 "March came in like a lamb, and it's ap- for Keystone and May 9 for Breck- • "I'm glad we're closing April 4. .,warm pearing to leave like a lamb," said Ben i enridge, officialssaid. We wouldn't make it much longer "it's that time of year when, if Friedland, spokesman for Copper Moun- i At Loveland, with a base eleva- than that," said April Bronner at you don't have raccoon eyes, tain. "Nonetheless, conditions are holding k Silver Creek. you've got some status-symbol Snow groomers tton of 10,600 feet; the snow has re- " joked Christenson. up pretty well." i at the resort have been jststed the warm weather some- At Telluride, where March snow- ' problems, Y vigilant in keeping the bare "cancers" to a minimum each night, he said.. "Historically, we see these types of con- ditions a little bit into April," said Kristin .Yantis, spokeswoman for Vail. "We've had some real beautiful, blue-bird ski days,' and: ;guests are definitely advised to.bring their. `;.sunscreen when they're ;out on the moun-'m 3 P ease see;SKt; , ~ ~:`i SuturdupSundgv, Afarch 26L21, 1.999 • The Aspen Tunes 9-A Process, process, process plan, plan, plan talk, talk, talk an now, at last whal:E) i The revised Aspen Area Community Plan nears completion X - but no one's certain what it will say By John Colson she said, once she finishes the draft and Aspen Times Staff Writer - turns it over to the Oversight Committee. The Aspen Area Community Plan the committee members are free to make update process is supposed to be cruising changes and even delay adoption of the into its final phase. plan if they think more work needs to be But some participants are not entirely - done. satisfied with the direction the process has Presently, Millar is scheduled to submit taken, arguing that the update has focused the draft to the Oversight Committee in too narrowly on affordable housing and April. If that committee does not call for not enough on other issues. j significant last-minute changes, the updat- "1'm not happy with the process right ` i•,•?;; - ed plan will then go to the Aspen and now," said former County Commissioner 1e Pitkin County Planning and'Zoning com- Helen Klanderud, who has served on the eI don't think this should missions for adoption, and finally to the "Character Focus Group" for the past half- City Council and county commissioners year and is now serving on the "Oversight just come out as a for their endorsements, probably some Committee" that is shepherding the plan time in May or early June. through the final phase of the update. housing plan. We have not 7 What follows is a partial review of a some of the committees' findings and rec- She said she is worried that, while the housing component of the plan has discussed the der focus ommendations. received considerable attention, other parts have gotten short shrift. m. uc J aS Much as we've Housing for how many? But another Oversight Committee Most participants agree that the most member, Tim Semrau, said the process is discussed housing.- critical component of the updated AACP right on target when it zeros in on hous- was the work of the Housing Committee, ing, even at the expense of other subject -Helen Klanderutt AACP which has issued a recommendation that areas. Oversight Committee member 1.000 new homes be built in the next five _ "I'll give it to you in one phrase," Sem- years. --;u said this week. "It's the housing, But, noted Housing Committee mem- - `d!" a paraphrase of President Bill ber Steve Falender, even within the com- in's much-reported slogan, "Its the mittee itself there was disagreement about .omy, stupid," a reminder to himself in that number. He said many of the commit- 1992 that if he concentrated his campaign tee members favored a smaller number, as on economic issues. he would win the low as 250 units, while some wanted to election. build as many as 2.500. Semrau maintained, and Klanderud and "There are people who believe there is others have agreed, that all of the various a vast unmet need for affordable housing. issues addressed in the AACP are linked and who want to see a lot more built." he in one way or another to the problem of said, adding that there is about an equal affordable housing. number who feel that local government But, Klanderud declared. "I don't think cannot possibly build enough to house this should just come out as a housing everyone who works in Aspen without plan. We have not discussed the other creating an unacceptable amount of focus areas as much as we've discussed growth. :tip a . housing." She believes the Oversight _ Other areas of discord within the com- Committee needs to do more work before mittee. he said, included the idea of using turning the updated plan over for adop- "I'll give it to you in one I r part of the city golf course or the Moore tion. 6t - ; y`fi,~= a open space for affordable housing. Both phrase: Its the housing, parcels are along Highway 82 just west of An overview town and have been mentioned as poten- •~~•'!.^x; .r- - tial affordable-housing sites. The update process began in the spring stulNdi* of 1998, when dozens of volunteers signed Falender said the committee never - Tim Semrau, AACP Oversight up to serve on nine "focus area commit- -"s~,m•„ directly addressed the conflict between tees" The committees were charged with Committee member - open-space advocates and housing propo- taking a look at the original 1993 AACP nents. but rather focused on the desire to to see what still applied and what should make Aspen a more "sustainable com-. be changed. munity." The committees have worked hard for The purpose of the AACP, according to months to come up with a lengthy array of the committee, should be to "create a "vision statements." "action plans" and housing environment which is dispersed. "policy and philosophy statements" that appropriately scaled to the neighborhoods. represent what the volunteer planners see affordable and respects our overall com- as the right direction for the Aspen area to munity concerns." go in the near future. The focus areas are The committee concludes that Aspen's growth; housing; transportation: parks, 1987 population was an example of the open space and the environment: com- correct balance between local workers. munity character: historic preservation: tourists and part-time residents. But con- design quality; arts, culture and education: trary to the 1993 plan. which called for and economic sustainabiliry. housing 60 percent of Aspen's work force The wealth of words generated by eight 'ls upvalley, the Housing Committee main- of these committees can be viewed on the tains that job growth in the last five years Internet, thanks to local computer expert has pushed the 60 percent goal out of Nick DeWolf and the Character Commit- reach. tee on which he served. DeWolf has post- Rather, Falender said, the committee ed the statements of all but the "economic discussed a need for a "critical mass" of sustainabiliry committee" on the Character anywhere between 5.000 and 7,000 work- Committee's Web site at Planner Stephanie Millar ers who live in the upper valley, although - get figure is not set in the miww.aspen.com/an actucharacter/. al tar . The Economic Sustainabilit Commit- concedes this week that committee's recommendations. tee never got going due to lack of interest there is some disquiet Falender said there also were disagree- ~ R r w hen the update process began in the ments about the "emphasis" of the hous- spring of 1998. But a committee finally ing program: Should it be geared strictly formed recently and is now charging among the VOIUIIte@r w ?'.ar toward helping employers keep employ- ahead to submit its own findings and rec- planners who have ees, or toward helping foster a more ommendations in time to be included in rounded community, complete with fami- the completed document, said Senior worked on the update. lies whose parents work in the area? Long Range Planner Stephanie Millar, "That's an important distinction," he who is in charge of synthesizing all the said, arguing that if the program were information generated by the committees strictly aimed at employees, projects could into a draft, updated Aspen Area Com- be filled with smaller units and built to munity Plan. - high densities close to the center of town. Millar conceded this week that there is But small units and dense projects some disquiet among the volunteer plan- "wouldn't work for families," he said. ners who have worked on the update. But, ¦ see MCP on page 17-A « Saturday-Sunday, March 2021, 1999 • The Aspen Times 17-A AACP lilk ¦ continued from page 9-A enced since 1990 has felt much Another recommendation is Among the recommendations higher," due mostly to a growth for the city to "buy back" acces- of the Housing Committee is that in lodging and service-oriented sory-dwelling units (ADUs) that t~~ the local housing office should jobs rather than in residential or have been built by developers to B J * ADAMS A V,C O, P ANY _ buy as much land as possible for commercial development. take advantage of regulatory , housing sites, and work on regu- The committee's recommen- incentives but have remained Real Estate O.,&4 er Grs~.'..d lotions that encourage business dation includes a call for an accu- empty of local working residents. and nonprofit organizations to do rate count of the current popula- In addition to the affordable- _ something to meet their own tion of the upper-valley area, housing-related recommenda- Stake Your Claim housing needs. establishment of a "recommenda- tions, the committee urges local c., The committee also urges the tion for peak physical and social government to find a way to limit housing office to seek partner- infrastructure capacity (schools, job growth to 1998 levels and ships with private developers and fire department, police, utilities, revise the city's land use codes to nonprofits to develop projects, roads, etc.)," and from that infor force growth to "pay its own and try to develop projects "in mation an identification bf how way" with "mitigation" payments town wherever possible" to avoid much room is left for new devel- or exactions. This should include gobbling up open spaces. opment, whether free-market res- new development as well as rede In terms of amending local idential, commercial or afford- velopment of existing properties, rT" regulations, the committee changes in use that lead to _ recommends allowing increases in service levels (and much higher densities with- service workers). development in Aspen proper than have There are people who of existing legally created lots. historically been permitted: - development using "transferred allowing more affordable believe there is a vast development rights" and other housing above commercial areas of growth that are not cov- Country Club Townlwme #64 businesses: and figure out unmet need for ered in current regulations. r' some way to require that The committee also calls for a ENJOY THE PRIVATE SETTING "accessory dwelling units" affordable housing, and "significant" reduction in the I? afforded by the lush landscaping off your back deck. Awake in the be occupied by qualified allowable size of houses in both - morning to the sounds of the coshing creek just outside your bedroom workers once they are built. who want to see a lot the city and the county, because window. This 4-bedroom plus storage loft residence is tastefully _ "there seems to be a correlation The question of growth more built." between larger homes and more furnished and includes many upgrades from its original condition. The second most critical required services on the proper- Featuring a very bright and open floorplan, this spacious townhome is issue underlying the update - Steve Falender, AACP Hous- ty." wonderful for entertaining family and friends in comfort. Outside, is how local governments Currently, house sizes are i choose from one of three deck areas to bask in the sun's warmth. should deal with growth. ing Committee member basically limited to 15,000 Surrounded by golf course and just a short stroll to The Snowmass The Growth Committee, square feet in the county and ° Club amenities, this treasure is offered for $1,095.000, furnished. ' at the outset of a 10-page 5.000 square feet in the city. No treatise on the issue, quotes new limit was proposed in the ;-~t_, nr J Plato's comparison of "a committee's recommendation. community to an individual with able housing. however. the need to keep various funs- The committee suggests that Much of the committee's rec- ss r r7 +4 ,,,,~v tionsbalanced.- local governments should build ommendations dealt with estab- To keep Aspen balanced, the 500 new homes for workers in lishment of the "urban growth t SK ?"'r- -.,,,,jrr. committee recommends estab- the next few years, disagreeing boundary," which as currently lishment of "a peak metro popu- with the recommendation of the envisioned would stretch from r~ =rt lation of approximately 27.000 housing committee. The Growth the eastern neighborhoods of 'I K +}?J~~ .(including locals, tourists, and Committee also recommends that Aspen to just west of the Aspen I commuting employees.)" local governments immediately Airport Business Center, and up According to local planning embark on a "buy-down" pro- the side canvons to encompass ' ; fore, the growth rate in the Aspen grain to.convert existing resider- existing development. r r - area has been held to between I ual properties to deed-restricted The recommendation also Crestwood #2206 / percent and 1.9 percent in the affordable housing, as part of a calls for establishment of a larger past five years, considerably larger goal of focusing growth "reserve area." to which urban- TOTAL COMFORT AND RELAXATION lower than the 2 percent growth within a proposed "urban growth style services can be extended rate called for in the 1993 AACP. boundary." and establish proce- "easily, economically and effi- t best describe this recently remodeled and beautifully furnished But the Growth Committee main- dures to encourage that conver- ciently" if deemed desirable. All + condominium. Featuring southwestern decor, every detail of this tains that "the growth rate experi- sion process. ¦ continued on following page exquisite property is upgraded including new carpet, textured ceilings and walls, lighting, wonderful woodwork, fixtures, and tile. One of only a handful 2-bedroom units rated VIP at The Crestwood, here you'll enjoy the convenient location, close to - the pool and ski slopes, as well as some of the finest hospitality in the - , - - - Rockies. Offered, tastefully form,hed, for $359,000. - i +_=yL iii {O` 7- 1 ' y , y JAI 4 r ~/'{v V ) ~a \ v r3 ,K r^;-; ay k Pine Ridge #I ' A CUT ABOVE THE REST Considered to he the finest location in the complex, this exquisite t WEST i DUPLEX townhome features many custom upgrades and improvements with exceptional quality details throughout. The spacious, open floorplan features architecture, custom design and fine art are blended to create a truly unique residence. eatures the living and dining areas, kitchen, den/office and master The indoor living space is augmented by 1400 sq. ft. of outdoor decks including oversized Jacuzzi, I . e suite on the upper level, where delightful views s and d light pour in - through many windows. Included on the entry level are two guest landscaped for privacy and serenity. This expansive 4500sq.fl. of integrated living space lends itself master suites, one with sliding glass doors that open to a flagstone to the true indoor/outdoor Aspen lffestyle.Master suite, twoadditional guest bedrooms, media room, patio. Watch the seasons change over the Elk Mountain Range from gourmet kitchen, home office/family room. This is a MUST-SEE! Offered furnished at $2,300,000, a - one of the many large picture windows or from the wmp-around unfurnished at $2,200,000. - - redwood deck. This stunning 3-bedroom plus den, 3R.-bath townhome is offered for $353,000, unfurnished. RSPB ~rlLl q cS L I U. _ MARK LEWIS NEIL C. HIGHT • KATHRYN SEWELL The Yellow Farmhouse Next to Alpine Bank OWNER - BROKERS PO Box 6699 • Snowmass Village, CO 81615 - 520 EAST COOPER STREET, STE. 23, ASPEN, COLORADO 91611 • (9701 925,6200 • !80014320747 970.9232111 • Fax: 970.9232927 e: mail: aspenaff@roi.net • wvaw.aspencffiliotes.com EMAIL: mark@biac.net • www.bjac.net YOUR PROPERTY DESERVES OUR 100% ATTENTION. WE PERSONALLY SHOW ALL OF OUR OWN LISTINGS!!! ]SA The Aspen Times • Saturday-Sunday, March 2471, 1999 t``i l.P HealthStyles Patricia Neeb, M.A. Fitness Equipment Psychotherapy ¦ continued born previous page ports the idea of converting some For all your Hypnosis urban-st le growth should be of it to uses such as affordable fitness equipment - Y Transforrnational work that fosses on confined to the boundary (or, in housing, in keeping with govern- needs. BODY • MIND time. the reserve area). ment's interest in developing BUY NOW AND j As part of the urban-growth lands near the city proper rather PAY NOTHING EMOTIONS • SPIRIT boundary, the plan calls for crc; than further out in the county. but UNTIL 1999. Insolence Accepted • Sliding Fee Style anon of a "green-(restructure, only if the conversion involves a defined as "a network or system trade that results in the creation r 925-7846 of parks and open spaces desired of similar or higher quality open and considered necessary to be space somewhere else. protected with the urban area." The committee specifically In addition, land-use-review cited "lands such as the Aspen - - codes and local governments' Golf Course. Marolt Property, - annexation plans should be Rio Grand Park. Music Tent updated and amended to coincide Parking lot, etc." as potential for_;'. with the boundary, the committee such trades, in order to retain as recommends. open spaces such properties as the Cozy Point Ranch, the W/J On transportation Ranch, the Aspen Mass property. The Transportation Commit- or the Burlingame Ranch - all tee's findings declare that the of which are miles from Aspen regional"community has "man- proper. aged to realize an extraordinary But at least one member of the set of accomplishments" in Open Space Committee, Jennifer recent years, ranging from a Craig, is worried that the scales paid-parking program and may be tilting away from open- expanded bus service to plans for space preservation in favor of the Entrance to Aspen and an finding sites for affordable hous- expanded trails system - for commuters and recre- ationalists. r But much more needs _ to be done, the commit- r'sw - - Ireally want people to tee opines, setting out a broad list of transporta- take a stand for open tion "philosophies" and - - policies aimed at further reducing the automo- space. Personally, 1 donrt bile's influence on local ORSUC society. believe in taking open LTD These include sugges- space and turning it into tions to increase the geo- graphic range and hours housing." of the paid-parking pro- gram, finding ways to -Jennifer Craig, AACP Open reduce traffic within Our Tradition town and hold Highway Space Committee, member 82 traffic flows to 1993 levels, and holding down any increase in the nom- J~IL ./U,/-/J,Y{l~ r! ~ i1 idn,e t MadII[~,..ts bed of parking spaces in - i~W and around town. The committee also endorses ing. continues thro-h Sunday, 8 am to 9 Fm Daily creation of a "Rural Transporta- "I really advocate exploring lion Authority Action Plan" to the "in-fill" option in town as T& Little Neff • 601 D. Dean St. & 611 E. Durant -Aspen handle future bus, rail and other much as possible," she said, transportation systems, and calls explaining that it would be better for a valleywide vote on the plan to build housing within the exist- by the year 2000. ing city limits instead of using up Ell The committee's recommen- open tracts on the fringes of dations call upon the Roaring town. 5 - 5 Fork Transit Agency to convert "I really want people to take a its fleet to "clean diesels" or stand for open space," she 5 _ alternative-fuel vehicles as declared. "Everybody's eyesight C5 r rEj quickly as possible, endorse the is really focused on housing. I construction of a light-rail system don't think all the options have I between downtown Aspen and been explored. Personally. I don't the Brush Creek Road inter- believe to taking open space and CSJ ,~r~, l - _ 5 change with Highway 82, and turning it into housing." 5 8[ 5 support the idea of keeping High- Ij f way 82 at two general traffic A tough process lanes for automobiles to "pre- The conflicts inherent in the 5 _ serve the character, safety and process of writing the update to 5 17: t traffic-limiting capacity" of the the AACP have become nearly as 5 I road. central to the debate as the final 5 140. 5 In general, the Transportation update itself, that much is clear. 5 5 Committee urges local govern- Planner Millar has indicated 5 5 r ments and citizens to find ways she intends o t do her best to craft 5 5 to get people out of cars and onto a document that takes the various or into other forms of transporta- divergent viewpoints into 5 lion, whether mass transit or per- account, and then leave it to the Lake Ranch! The perfect gentleman's ranch! Swedish Co designed to 5 sonal conveyances such as bicy- Oversight Committee to decide 5 g 5 cles or foot traffic. what will actually be retained in 5 home on 45 acres. A 16 acre shared lake with special fish and waterfowl habitat. 5 the revised AACP. 5 Horses are welcome. This is the perfect getaway only 30 minutes from Aspen in the 5 Save the open spaces Committee member Falender Crystal Springs area. Look at this great today! There is no other like it. The committee dealing with spoke at length about the con- property 5 _ this area's parks, open spaces and flicts within the Housing Com- rj Call Toll Free digital Pager 1-888-699-9138. 5 environment came down squarely mittee and his concerns that the t5 5 on the side of preserving what final version might not reflect all 5 Little Victorian Condo. 99 Remodel, One Meadow Ranch (Snowmass Village). 5 dedicated open spaces and park the "diverse viewpoints" but 5 Bedroom, One Bath w/all new appliances 2 bedroom - 4 bedroom, 365,000 - 890,000. 5 lands there are now in the upper instead might be dominated by ~5 5 valley, and expanding that inven- staff interpretations, the biases of 5 and great island kitchen floor plan. Located Building Sites. Be sure to ask about the 5 tory wherever possible. certain officials and "a consensus 5 on the sunny side of Main St. Fenced patio availability of building sites in Aspen or 5 According to the city, approxi- that doesn't exist." 5 w/hot tub. Pets allowed. $344,000 Snowmass. 5 mately one-third of Aspen's "Ultimately, it's a question of 5 5 overall area is held as dedicated what they finally adopt," he said. 5 open space of one kind or anoth- goofar, the process has been Call Bill, or Rick er. The committee officially y sup- good." , 5 for personal, 5 5 We are a legal stimulant. Aspen professional 5 5 AA~ 5 715 West Main Street. Suite 303 Aspen, CO real estate services i iiPl 5 970-920-2530 5 Fm subscription hdonnadw pit ca Win- Wokoe at 970.925.3114 W. 219 O rlaFJrPrle 1r., F. r3'3rJ'arJrJr~rl3rJrPrJrJrJpPePr.PrJ'dJ'1rJ'arJrJrlarnr~tPrJrJ'3ePr~rlrJ'ar1r~J~ePePrJ'3rJ'3rPrlrJ~rPr~rJ'dlarJ ~ 0 A ZB THURSDAY, MARCH 24, 1999 STEAMBOAT TODAY 1# it i~ • , lti= v,~ct`i i `I • • , C,r y , Open Letter to the Local Community: J ~ March 23, 1999 ,i 1 i In November of 1997, our company completed the purchase of Steamboat and Heavenly from Kamori International Corp. The transition has not been a smooth one; indeed, Steamboat has been a bigger challenge for our company than any of the other resorts American Skiing Company has acquired. There were several thinJs that attracted our attention to Steamboat. Obviously, the great skiing was primary. The potential for current and future suc- cess was also attractive. But probably the biggest thing that attracted our interest was the friendliness and character of the community. Steamboat, like no other resort in the country, makes guests feel welcome and at home. v.~ In retrospect, it's clear that we've both created and exacerbated some misunderstandings. This has made the transition unnecessarily difficult. Our company is very different from other companies which have owned the resort. We move quickly to build ski assets like lifts, trails and snowmaking, and - when market conditions permit - build real estate that attracts guests to return year after year. 1 Our company has succeeded on the strength of a management style which has worked very well elsewhere. This style has not worked well at }a Steamboat, and I take full responsibility for this. I apologize for the misunderstandings. I ask for your cooperation as we go forward in creating a supportive, mutually respectful relationship between the town, the Ski Corp. and American Skiing Company. Eliminating misun- derstandings is the first step in improving a relationship. The following are our views on several key issues. STRENGTH OF THE STEAMBOAT BRAND - Steamboat is one of the most recognizable names in skiing worldwide. The Steamboat image says 1' western skiing at its finest. It's friendly and family-oriented, and it serves both the resort and the town well. We have never had any intention of changing this. I'm sensitive to the perception that our company's culture is in conflict with Steamboat's core values. Therefore, I'm working to make sure that all of our staff are sensitive to the community's values and respectful of its traditions. COMPETITION WITH LOCAL BUSINESSES -The rumor mill has it that we're planning to operate all of the businesses in Gondola Square as soon as the leases run out. This simply isn't true. I believe that a balance of resort-owned and healthy, independent businesses bring creativity and personality to ski resorts base areas. THE GRAND SUMMIT: TOO BIG, TOO FAST - The Hotel is actually smaller than the vested project approval for La Courcheval at the Knoll site. We worked closely in a public process with the City to address design and site concerns. I now know that there's a f perception that this project moved through the planning process too quickly and received special treatment. I don't feel the public record supports this view, and suspect most City staff and regulating authorities would agree. We are encouraged that more than 30 percent of the quarter share units sold to date'have been sold to local residents. THE CURRENT SKI SEASON - The entire Steamboat resort community can take pride in the fact that Steamboat is beating the market in this very difficult year. As of the end of February. skier visits in Colorado were off 5.47 percent: at the same time. Steamboat was off 5.I percent. While these are disappointing results, the hard work of the Steamboat staff has helped turn a tough season around. To further strengthen busi- ness for next year. we've made guarantees with American Airlines to ensure a non-stop daily flight from Chicago to Hayden, and are negotiating .4p t increased seats into Hayden. OUR COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATUS - With few exceptions, this has been an extraordinarily difficult year for the ski industry. Given our visi- bility as a public company, this has led to it number of negative news stories. which raise understandable concerns in the community. It is true that our company is highly leveraged - a scenario which is not unusual among rapidly growing companies. We had some bad luck with weather here in Colorado and in the Northeast which created some real financial challenges. However, we're in better financial shape than most of the news stories would indicate. And I'd like the community to know that w'e're working hard to keep our financial house in order in this very challenging year. t LOCAL CONTROL OR CONTROL FROM AFAR - Our goal as a company is for each resort to function autonomously, while taking advantage of i economies of scale and sharing the best practices of each resort. Certain company wide programs are offered throughout the system. With the best of f intentions, many of the ideas brought to Steamboat in the past year were not successfully integrated, despite having been successful elsewhere. While we do as owners have a right to expect our affiliates to deliver on these programs, we clearly did not adequately communicate the need or the benefits' l - and this has led to problems. The fault is ours. I would add that it is up to the management of each resort in our company to operate in a manner j which meets goals that are mutually agreed upon by the resort and the company. It is entirely up to the resort to determine how to meet that goal. GONDOLA SQUARE - We will make the redevelopment of Gondola Square a priority. ' ? COMMITMENT TO COMPETITIONS - We recognize the incredible achievements of Steamboat athletes and will look for t opportunities to host future World Cup events. We will also work closely with the Winter Sports Club and local schools to ensure that our young peo- ple have every opportunity to excel in the sport we love. Change begins by acknowledging the problem and charting a course for resolution. We're working hard to make this happen, and I believe you will note progress in the near future. I plan to work closely with the team at Steamboat - one of the best in the business - and I have full confidence in i their ability to move forward. Again, I apologize for the strained relationship that has developed between the company and the community, and intend to.work hard to correct the sit- uation. Sincerely, i .}I~G~t~t1 /J - Leslie B. Often, Chairman American Skiing Company ~r t~ F 14 Town of Vail Sales Tax Worksheet 3/29/99 % Change % Change 1999 Budget from from Month 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Budget Collections, Variance 1998 Budget 1January 1,126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,855,364 1,805,707 1,894,597 1,935,782 2,052,569 2,115,359 2,188,943 2,040,410 (148,533) -3.54% -6.79% February 1,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,828,766 1,814,495 1,816,107 1,993,389 2,089,673 2,153,1211111 2,228,041 1,980,097 (247,944) -8.04% -11.13% Total 2,331,597 3,027,156 3,294,973 3,450,434 3,490,222 3,684,130 3,620,202 3,710,704 3,929,171 4,142,242 4,268,480 4,416,984 4,020,507 (396,477) -5.81% -8.98% March 1,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 1,988,090 2,250,656 2,139,298 2,240,865 2,580,992 2,368,0771 2,450,164 April 550,205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 864,303 794,668 791,092 966,993 874,427 1,107,3341 1,145,861 May 170,567 215,548 236,359 250,809 268,000 257,248 287,315 324,681 318,920 329,783 382,7181 396,027 June 329,039 393,470 448,227 468,948 468,598 475,161 548,820 590,685 594,907 630,366 633,4001 655,430 July 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 811,538 892,830 893,483 963,717 1,043,637 1,107,8821 1,146,156 August 575,887 668,119 678,071 761,992 767,257 825,954 891,566 867,125 990,650 1,073,430 1,183,9261 1,224,834 September 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 645,902 630,453 637,831 735,6081 760,913 October 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367,578 400,525 408,405 461,791 413,573 472,836 515,5311 532,652 November 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 497,907 553,681 594,491 611,147 601,208 707,166 656,5961 678,336 December 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,775 1„846,223 1.974.553 1992,855 1,994,540 2,068,851 2,254,709 2,070,834 2,132,272 Total 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,603,647 12,395,718 13,007,013 13,030,448 13,719,308 14,747,419 15,030,386115,539,629 4,020,507 11,519,122 JANUARY 1999 f > VAIL BUSINESS TOWN OF NAIL REVIEW March 26. 1999 This edition of the Vail Business Review examines January 1999 sales tax collections. Overall January sales tax decreased 3.7% with Retail decreasing 4.4%, Lodging decreased 3.3 Food and Beverage decreased 3.1 % and Other (which includes items such as utilities, taxable services i.e. plumbing, electrical and rentals or leases) decreased 3.3%. January 1998 brought us The Sprint World Ski Challenge and in January 1999 we had Red Bull's Mogul Mania, Baileys' American Ski Classic and the Lionshead '99 Street Party. Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax collections, as opposed to actual gross sales. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125 or Steve Thompson at (970) 479-2116. Sincerely. Sally Lorton Sales Tax Administrator r JANUARY SALES TAX VAIL VILLAGE JANUARY JANUARY JANUARY 1998 1999 % Collections Collections Change Retail 3789:571.1' 358,302 Lodging 381,384 3649526 Food & Beverage .2869768 276,821 3 5%° Other 13,450 8,601 Total 11060,173 11008,250' 4.9% LIONSHEAD JANUARY JANUARY JANUARY 1998 1999 % Collections Collections Change Retail 168,758 149,055 11.7 % Lodging 217,082. 216,056 - 0.5%° Food & Beverage 82,403 849481 2.5% Other 8,110 6,394 -21 2% i Total 4761353 455,986 4.3% JANUARY SALES TAX CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIL/SANDSTONE/WEST VAIL JANUARY JANUARY JANUARY 1998 1999 % Collections Collections Change Retail 167,402 :164,736 16%°' Lodging 194,587 7'87,018 Food & _ o Beverage 55,194 50,174 9 2 Other 9,067 11,325 24 '9%. Total 426,250 413,193 OUT OF TOWN JANUARY JANUARY JANUARY 1998 1999 % Collections Collections Change Retail 26,615 36,940 38.8% Lodging 6,350 5,033. 20 7% Food & Beverage 792 350 55.8%:J Other 120,063 119,438 _0 5% Total 153,820 161,761 5 2°l° `I JANUARY SALES TAX TOTAL JANUARY JANUARY JANUARY - 1998 1999 % Collections Collections Change Retail 7419346 709,033 4.4% Lodging 7999403' - 7721633 Food & Beverage 425,157 411,7fifi , 11% Other :1509*690 145,758 3.3% Total 2,116,596 2,039,190 3.7% RETAIL SUMMARY JANUARY JANUARY JANUARY 1998 1999 % COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE FOOD 132,570 124,591 -6.0% LIQUOR 25,695 24,342 -5.3% APPAREL 111,490 102,394 -8.2% SPORT 317,253 310,693 -2.1% JEWELRY 27,899 23,947 -14.2% GIFT 28,989 21,371 -26.3% GALLERY 6,669 5,397 -19.1% OTHER 90,298 96,298 6.6% HOME 483 0 -100.0% OCCUPATION TOTAL 741,346 709,033 -4.4% Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 ASPEN bo WEffix VC S~ ) v cow story to Pat's night are PAT O'DONNELL IS WORRIED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF ASPEN - AND HE'S WORRIED THAT NO ONE ELSE IS AS WORRIED AS HE IS s 3fY , " ~ lr+ i .h J.y 1. Cover photo: Michael Brands, Cover design: Bonnie Mineo. This page: Piit- O'Donnell isn't afraid to admit he's worried about the future of Aspen as a "ski -town: "-Michael Brands photo"-' IT'S NOT BUSINESS AS USUAL. WHAT'S MADE ASPEN AND SNOWMASS SUCCESSFULAN;THE PAST IS NOT NECESSARILY:GOING TO.MAKE THEM SUCCESSFUL IN THE FUTURE.- YOU CANT REST ON YOUR LAURELS ANYMORE. PAT O'DONNELL By Scott Condon Welcome to Pat's nightmare Aspen Times Staff Writer O'Donnell said "there a lot of f Pat O'Donnell is a tough guy. He dynamics right now" in the ski looks like a Marine. He's climbed industry that he finds nerve-racking. mountains. He's sailed the ocean. First, there is the consolidation y_ Now he runs what he calls "the best frenzy that created giants such as ski resort in the world." Vail Resorts (operator of Vail, So, why is the CEO and pres- ident of the Aspen Skiing Co. telling people he's "scared"? Because deep down inside. Paths got reason to t "y some doubts are gnawing away. He's not so sure that this worry. He's been season's awful performance - for the Skico as well as much marginalized. Skiing is of the ski industry - can be written off to below-average now seen as something snowfall. O'Donnell is concerned to do on a sunny day." about the changes sweeping the ski industry. He's con- -Ford Frick, ski resort cerned about his company's economist/consultant ability to meet those chal- lenges - and he's even more concerned about whether Aspen itself even realizes that the challenges exist. S' "I guess what I'm saying is, a it's not business as usual," y O'Donnell said. "What's made Aspen Beaver Creek, Breckenridge and \ a- and Snowmass successful in the past Keystone), American Skiing Co. is not necessarily going to make them (Steamboat. Killington and The successful in the future. You can't rest Canyons) and Intrawest (Whistler- w on your laurels anymore." ¦ continued on following page wF zy. -1 a, . - .`,kaa--tee,..ti=Y'..' r -•+--i. y .-t:, ..s_w > v.•. ~.'•':1; f t;-:.F~t-': t -s r: r``':r- E;:. :7as=l~. WlYf ii Y 1 •14-A lire Aspect Tuttes • SahodayStmday, March 27-28,1999 ¦ . bd Chain prevk !m page r BI:..:1.,......b and- Co . ppe t Second~t6e;ski indu.stryhas-cfeated a climate where customers expect major sl ' y improvemenis each season - faster lifts, d more terrain, better restaurants and extra -amenities. The three industry giants, plus. a bevy of smaller resort operators, are in a better position than the Skico to fund r® i those improvements, because they also sell real estate at their ski-area bases. Sales of lots for second homes pay for construction of their new chairlifts. In a recent article in Ski magazine, Aspen Times columnist Hal Clifford r l that at least $5 billion of work is planned at 30 , ski-area bases mi.-III OF 11111:2 over the next decade. One of those projects is Gerald } Hines' village at Aspen Highlands. The Skico has a minor interest in that project. The third factor causing O'Donnell concern is community expectations that pi it it affect the Skico, but not many of its com- petitors. The Aspen area has subscribed to r slow growth, or at least slower growth than many other resorts. The Skico must play by mles.that other resort operators don't face. Plus, when the company tries rc to venture into businesses other than lift ticket sales and ski school operations, much of the community cries foul. A stagnant Industry 3 O'Donnell's concerns aren't limited to P .t- competition within the ski industry. The - ~1 w c t _ 4 industry itself faces a fair share of prob lens.<> r r } rs1 r . # RMW "Basically we're in a market-share bat- % tle in a flat industry," he said. ' last season all ski areas in the country r'. + r racked up 54.1 million skier and snow- f -y r ti ! r' board rider visits, according to the Nation- al Ski Areas Association. That is down** 7~ x some 500,000 visits, or 9 percent, from the ` ray S~ L r ' ! - a ter' a L .,-s- x Y banner season of 1993-94. - ut That decrease was nationwide. Over i ~ ' r ' ~ a,r~. i, y__ ~ , that same five-year period, Colorado ski ,.r x ` t\ areas' user visits wen[ up by 7 percent. ' The Aspen Skiing Co. experienced the ? x f w -,fr llr same modest rate of growth. z - But the numbers are tumbling this sea- i son. Nationally, the ski industry isn't expected to come close to 54 million vis- its . Colorado ski areas were down almost .ti 5.5 percent through February compared to y tt = last season. #F t The Aspen Skiing Co. reported that lift ~ •°'x r= ticket sales were down 14.5 percent and n^ - overall visits, which factor in locals' use r}a1r`. 'A aY of season passes, were down 12 percent. Y- Death of a sid town What O'Donnell finds frustrating is that Aspen might not consider itself a "ski town" any longer. Retail sales in the city of Aspen grew If 58 percent from 1990 to 1996. Skier visits grew about 20 percent over that same peri- od, according to BBC Research and Con- sulting, a Denver firm working on the updated Aspen Area Community Plan. ' People are still coming to town - as retail sales growth attests - but they are Top: Many Aspen visitors are much more Interested In cruising the stores than cruisin on the slo finding things to do other than skiing. g pas. Above: Aspen offers a "People are still coming for seven many amenities and diversions for non-skiing visitors - from jewelry stores to pastry shops to pleasant spots for relaxing days, but they are only skiing for four or In the sun. Devon Meyers photos. five," noted Molly Campbell, general stood up and said 'By God, we're a ski drive it anymore, until I'm literally decades," O'Donnell said. "I've talked to manager of The Gant condominiums. town first and foremost and we want to stopped, then you've got my attention." my peers in the industry about what There are no true ski towns anymore, keep our reputation worldwide and our In Aspen's case, business operators will they're experiencing. I think that in our claimed Ford Frick, an economist with brand equity worldwide,' " O'Donnell gladly fill lodges, restaurants and shops community, at least from my perspective, BBC who specializes in resort areas. said. there's no sense of urgency, the sense is "There are resort towns now that offer a The name Aspen has "the greatest that nothing has changed here and nothing r bundle of attractions that make them an brand equity" in the world, whether is wrong." interesting place to be." you are talking to people in Aus- Frick's theory is that companies like tralia, Brazil or anywhere else, ~W@ don't want to get more the Skico are dealing with the maturation O'Donnell maintained. Should the inky ais e4 of the ski industry. In the 1950s, skiing "What is that related to, Comed PO@pl@ in the valley. We The Comedy Fest issue rases a far Comedy broader question: Are the changing was adventure, he said. In the '60s, it was Fest? Aspen still enjoys, in my hum- Want to got more people 111 dynamics a Skico problem or a commun- sporL In the '70s, it became recreation and ble view, worldwide recognition as a ity problem? in the '80s, it was lifestyle. ski town. As of today, that's where the valley skiing." A healthy Ski Company is good for ; Now in the 1990s, skiing is viewed as we're still at," O'Donnell said. the community," said Diane Moore, who an amenity, one of many activities that an But he wonders if business people -Jim Crown, man ( left her post as resident of the Aspen resort area has to offer. care about what got Aspen where it president Chamber 0i "Pat's got reason to worry," said Frick. is and, more importantly, whether partner for the Crown family, Resort Association this week "He's been marginalized. Skiing is now they are concerned about the com- Aspen Skico owners aft have er four years on the job. "If fo didn't "t seen as something to do on a sunny day." munity's ability to compete in the skiing on Aspen Mountain for _ son, what would the bottom line of many _c many future. businesses look like?" € Skico Isn't laughing He believes people have been. Moore said she agrees with O'Donnell Skico officials felt a bit stung when the lulled into a false sense of security, that businesses should work to promote Comedy Fest came to Aspen during the unaware of the challenges the com- the health of the local ski industry. Yet she _ -first weekend in March. They acknowl- pany and the community face in the also believes it is wise for the community edged in newspaper articles that they competitive world of recreation. to diversify to guard against economic ~a wished the beds taken up by the yucksters "I think it's sort of like gridlock in Los with participants in events like Comedy disaster in case of something like a low- would have been reserved for skiers. Angeles, where everybody says please, Fest and reap short-term benefits. But in snow year f - Support for the Skico's position was please, please take mass transit," O'Don- the long run, Aspen will be hurt by not The Gant's Campbell said she doesn't L... G:. , helming, to say the IeasL _ nell said. "And the guy basically ..,,r,,,..ds saving those beds for skiers, he predicted. believe the community truly understands - Thirty years ago people would have by saying I'll drive my car until I can't "I've been doing this for three the importance of the Skico or the Music raa : x c Y ~~a: s - .4,rv-• •-1t+ SaturdaySunday March 27-28, 1999 • The Aspen Times 15-A -Fesiival to Aspen's overall economic health.-Government, the private sector and individuals should do more to pro- .-mote the health of both entities, she said, but too often, they don't work together. "_We as a community often think of the Aspen„Skiing Company as the enemy;" said Campbell. "I think as a community[ we have to be easier on them than we have.,, Aspen Lodging Association President f Warren Klug said many hoteliers are well 3 aware of trends facing the ski industry, I-` -such as people spending less time on the, pl slopes. is He said he personally feels lodges should work closely with the Skico to pro- .i mote skiing. But it is a two-way street that r3 it gn ; 5. requires the Skico to be concerned about r• ~ t the needs of lodges. Y r: Snowmass Village Resort Association Executive Director Terry Hunt said there q ^ is a segment of the community that { believes the Skico has deep enough pock- r i$' a q, x''y ets that they don't need community sup- `Z • , . 4'. port. Those people don't understand what's happening in the ski industry, he [t said In Snowmass Village alone, retail sales have shot up 31 percent in the last three full seasons while skier visits have been flat. The Skico has no choice in its three- r r to-five-year business plan but to look for alternative ways to build revenues, according to Hunt. "They are not going to do that in skier' visits," he said. +R , ~ rj t Patience, not benevolence Economist Frick said the Skico's com-F 3r s, • ( j 7 Al petitive challenges should be cause for community concern. In the short term, it's apparent that the Aspen economy can sus- tain a substantial drop in skier visits - as ' this season's performance shows, he said. Although tourists visits are down 14.5 r` percent for the Skico, Aspen's retail sales were on par. with last season through Jan- mountain improvements at the Skico's . uary. four areas, plus affordable housing for But if the Skico's maiority owners, the company workers, according to O'Don- 1 Crown family, cannot compete against nell. ,a Vail Resorts and American Skiing, the But if the capital-improvement frenzy j implications for Aspen are huge, Frick of the ski industry continues, he wonders ! {,'x said. how the Skico will continue to compete. "The economic health of the Aspen "After the club, I'm out of bullets,"~ Skiing Company is not great; "said Frick. O'Donnell said. trr "It boils down to you have very benevolent owners. How long is that } going to last?" ti Jim Crown, managing partner for "A healthy Ski Company is his family, noted that "benevolence is a subjective term" and one he wouldn't use. "I would describe us good for the community. patient," he said. if we didn't have skinn ! SPEN f Crown said he is concerned about g on {F the drop in skier visits this season, Rr but his family sees no reason to Aspen Mountain fora ~f panic. Even given the factors caus- season, what would the ing O'Donnell's concerns, Crown r a a , still thinks the Skico can successful- bottom line of many ly compete with the ski industry giants' businesses look like" t "We can't compete with them on y - . their terms," he said. "We can com- Diane Moore, 0 pete on our terms. It's a little like asking can a boutique compete former president of the i against Wal-Mart." Aspen Chamber When asked if his family ever • Resort Association w1 considered taking the Skico public - like Vail Resorts and American Skiing have done - to raise funds y~ for capital improvements, he : ' • Y ° responded, "not really." Different E people have pitched offers to help the Finding new ways to raise revenues is Crowns do that. The family has listened, one of the new duties of the Skico's second but declined, he said. in command, John Norton. He was promot- Instead, they want to increase the ed from a'position where he oversaw ski Skico's business by getting people onto operations to a broader position overseeing the slopes more often. food service, marketing and business `!f "We don't want to get more people in rv. anities as well as ski operations. the valley," Crown said. "We want to get O'Donnell said he's "proud" of the more people in the valley skiing." low-growth philosophy his company has The most interesting aspect of recent subscribed to and that he's not looking for trends to him is that Aspen and Snowmass significant expansion of terrain. But he is ^ 111 Village have continued to grow - in size seeking community support on expanded f' and retail sales - while skier visits have use of existing facilities, such as nighttime lagged behind. The old theory was that use of Aspen Mountain's Silver Queen Aspen could keep a lid on growth by lim- Gondola for operations at the Sundeck. 1=? „5ti y iting the number of skier visits. It's also clear that O'Donnell thinks his "The nexus between skier visits and company have been unfairly criticized for rt R 4 . growth has dissolved," said Crown. its pricing strategy. When operating in a - r''' . :i, .r. `k • ,.r'c i. low-growth area in an industry where cap Af,,. , . to compete ital improvements are required annually The-Skico sees the somewhat contro- by customers, the company doesn't have ; tcl versial decision to include a private club at any option but use price to its advantage, 7-'s=, uT' , N, the new Sundeck as a way to compete in according to O'Donnell. - - the ski industry. It will sell 375 member- He is well aware that the, Skico's $63 Top: The Bell Mountain Lift offers the kind of slow, scenic'rkte up the mountain i ships for $50,000 to the Aspen Mountain single-day lift ticket is targeted by some that used to be perfectly acceptable. Now that lilt is mostly empty. Above: The Ciub,slated to open late next season. people as the reason for the decline in Silver Queen Gondola Is the kind of expensive Improvement that skiers have The money that is raised will fund on- ¦ continued on fo0owfng page come to expect on a regular basis. Michael Brands photo. - - . Aspen SaMday-Sund 1G-A The Times • try, March 27-28,199.9 ` 0 continued from previous page challenge is to get them to try winter - ti _ skier visits this season. sports and to stay with it. Everybody "I say hogwash," he said. "Go up and, wants a piece of their recreational action." a~r r talk to Winter Park, talk to Copper, talk to The question, economist Frick said, is rpit _ Crested Butte, talk to Vail - they've got a whether a place like Aspen can success- cheaper ticket. Guess what, folks, e price doesn't seem to have all that y:_• much to do with it. Y' "ro the destination visitor, $2 or "We as a community often $3 or $4 dollars a day doesn't make. a difference." think of the Aspen Skiing } ?F Lift tickets are only a part - and is a small part - of the high cost of Company as the enemy. i the skiing experience, dwarfed by w s g~ ' the expenses of travel and lodging, think as a community we 4 p :;a y O'Donnell said. In his mind, the a x f( question people should be asking have to. be easier on them isn't whether an Aspen skiing vaca- tion is expensive, but whether it pro- than we have." F Y.t_ vides value. O'Donnell believes , t Aspen and Snowmass are doing well Molly Campbell, general manager in that regard. of The Gant condominiums He also finds some solace in the t coming of age of the 72-million- strong"echo boom" generation, the sons and daughters of the 78 million baby boomers. While the baby tt 1 boomers have fueled the ski industry ' r p - -for so long, they aren't skiing as often. The fully .compete against resorts that offer - - coming of age of their children could be the more amenities. The fare at on-mountain restaurants has been steadily Improved, moving from industry's saving grace. "I think it's up in the air who's going to up-standard cafeteria fare to include roasted vegetables and gourmet pizza. "In sheer numbers they are there," said win," Frick said. "I still believe in my Coming next year to Aspen Mountain Is a much fancier Sundeck, Including an O'Donnell. "That's the good news. The heart there's a role for Aspen." exclusive private club. Michael Brands photo. t { . L When You See News Happen, Call 925-6660, v t IT s 1 HOT 'fil i. - -aSx•{'.E atf tir F`' viz / THE y x ti ; VVV ASPEN ~Y TIMES WEEKLY tADp~ a CURRENT RATES m Roaring Fork Valley I y- $18 - 2y- S-19 Outside Roaring rot Valiq dR 6 months S19- 1 year $32. 2 yt $54 F-igo - 5 rnon:hs $45 • , year $7' _ - : - _ -,413 { ~,..q~Y ~ h t -!..si5 . ; . Cr dll CW: VJ%_ M1ager Card (4dtlfardf EiphViom Name: Address: r State i= Daytia Itl yj, - Mont -Ma 'C;} X a~i:.' .!~T"~• ~a.: r ` iwi c- Y t~ 7,1 TIZ AKIN TIME 310E Main St. Aspen, CO 61611 r - (970).925-3414 New taxes may be the y answer Tray to S'thorne's revenue woes bell( Jane By Jane Reuter ¦ Committee explores options ° lyN Daily News Staff Writer GREET SILVERTHORNE - Silver- to create additional revenue VOIR - thome residents and developers oversees spending of a $6.3 million could be asked to vote on a tax issue. Monday to could be looking at new taxes in the bond issue to improve Blue River Silverthorne did away with its merged-in future. Additional revenue sources parkway and build part of the River- property tax in '94. Residents voted voir, fi6 N for the town will be explored by a inside the Center - is also now studying these to waive the town's general fund Silverthorne committee during the the vehicle revenue options, said town finance property taxes, and allowed the town way 9 into next two months. director Donna Braun. They will pre- to keep up to $35 million in sales Town officials cite impending Along sent their findings to the council dui- taxes. down the residential development that stands ing its 6 p.m. May 25 meeting. - An _excise tax,: Braun. said,.'is to double Silverthorne's size and the n p were : also Those fund sources could include ically assessed on a square-foota e loss of sales tax revenue as incen- - g e s: rives for seeking additional revenue. a municipal property tax, im act basis on new development. It gives P - police'scan The nine Silverthorne residents fees and/or an excise tax, Braun said. governments more flexibility than . under the v who serve on Silverthorne's citizens Depending on the group's find- The..-Sut oversight committee - a group that ings and recommendation, citizens Please see Tar options page 6 cue Teaifi t b _ - L_ 1 ' ap.i~T~i r ?I Visit Swan Mountain Resort, Summit County's only "Gold Crown" Timeshare resort. When you preview Swan N1 Mountain Resort, we will refund $700 dollars to shop of the factory outlet stores in Dillon/Silverthorne. F 453-7627 or 888-715-4900_ SOMRESTRICTIONS APPLY CALL OR DETAILS cs~.} www.frenchridge.com • 800-597-7926 _ MdrcK 30,-1-9W PEN-<.......... O In'te"rstate, 70 eastbound:Arm I An L ST tIDhO ntionfram erce, detou ear n'.' :Cl : Cree'k Y-4- f .4iki Bre><genzer hair Studio) Daily News staff report moved slightly to the north. Howev= build two new westbound structures: er, the current speed limit of 55 mph Contractor Edward:Kraemer and is • exp. 428/99 CLEAR CREEK COUNTY - will remain the same for those dri- Sons haS:200 calendar days in which Tin Motorists'who travel Interstate 70 to vers. - - to -complete the 'construction and . ligator Lounge) Denver will face a new detour just. switch traffic back onto the new east-., 453-W20 ~r east of Idaho Springs and the Twin . The :new lane alignments will bound structures:, If the work goes Tunnels. Eastbound traffic will be allow contractors to -demolish' and past the 200-day mark, the company switched onto a new alignment as. a rebuild the two eastbound I-70 struc- will be assessed a $4,000 -a-day fee: second phase of the interchange tares: When Phase•II is completed, improvement project begins. traffic' in both. directions will be -Information courtesy ofthe The $9 million project started last moved again onto the new eastbound Colorado Department of Tr'ais-; August and replaces five bridges. structures. The contractor. will'then - portation Motorists-will find the new align- this-ad t1St IIleIItIOII , ment a dramatic change. Eastbound ttY0l1"dOII!t need 'no tffic is beingdetoured from current _ S ..CO. OIL))aging bridge'structures'to- atemp o- Plane ,~bound for f - Iowa . rary alighment.-A tight ctirve'pla'ces , both lanes brn the-newly- built `c'ore- :0 01-An r l g Crete off- and on-ramps frorrireast= p i e r . s s ln bound I-70 to Hidden Valley. DURANGO (AP) - A small missing and the FAA issued an alert It is critical for motorists to stay 1 e bell t an wa am 1 0 within `tho: eurrciitly Posted 4Q ttiph •q Y, ! x r1 tice Sunday pi x I, ry ai . ~.~t ~eY 1 railer after thfl a- 1heflarne _ e Yo4 and speed-liftii_It ough this-sectio 6f r° g p, ~r our Protect said CDOT project cry failed'to arrive in Des Moms s; -gers were not re leased, -but Fryer Fcderal Aviation Admimstra'. said three people were believed to } engineer Tony Devito. "We will use tlx variable messy a boar lion said Monday be aboard,-, v g ds to relay the The single engine Piper Chero- import ance of - the. speed 1iiiiif at '1t'.$llla~ price,,, kee was-supposedto leave,the La Fryer said the only t dcan<l required-for the new eastbound align- , Plata County Airport on Saturday tact with the piloE•was a tele hang esger value free: meat." p k mornmg_and arrive in Des Moines call requesting a weather brw 141 ' Law enforcement officers will be that afternoon,. FAA spokesman Saturday morning ys Thursdays watching this area closely for speed- Lee Fryer said-4 -The pilot did not file a fjigtit id with an other offer. ers: `Relatives reported the plane plan; Fryer aid. any _ Westbound I-70 lanes will be py Hour 4-7 &9-dose ; y Tax options i 1 from page 3 impact fees; she added. - - While both--of-the taxes are -an don't think we've had any decrease," "An impact fee is strictly used for effortto make growth pay for itself she said, "but thatis possible x capital," Brauer-said. ,"In the metro - Braun said the'options need a great M area, impact fees are usually chat- deal more consideration. `We re asking this-co mrnumty`to ' tt lenged by developers as to-whether Town officials recently opted to be proactive, look at the future and ' they were appropriate: freeze salaries, citing skyrocketing "An excise tax is a one=time tax costs; but Brauti' said sales tax rev- • give :council some .direction as to that can be used for operations as enues lost, in part, to City Market's how we should be,facing i' Braun well as capital," she added. "The _moye, haven't impacted -the town . explained:- "Once this development ' City of Boulder has one, Broomfield elsewhere. u - is here it's a date deal We need to ' has one... - "In terms of services, so far I:' be°logking at these things now 4~ s 71 Eli RS C" I N C"'I 01rr v *50 :i . BUSINESS OF -.7 days a iweek -A / ``t u TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Mayor Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Robert E. Ford, Mayor DATE: March 30, 1999 RE: Lionshead Rezoning Due to a lengthy meeting Tuesday evening, please review the two Lionshead ordinances prior to the meeting and contact Dominic at 479-2148 with any question or concerns you may have. Thank you for your time. REF/aw TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 MEDIA ADVISORY March 30, 1999 Contact: Nina Timm, 479-2144 Town of Vail Housing Coordinator EAST VAIL "BUY-DOWN" UNIT COULD BE AWARDED TO SOLE APPLICANT One person has submitted an application to participate in the Town of Vail's upcoming housing lottery for the town's first "buy-down" unit, a two-bedroom condominium in East Vail. The sales price for the deed-restricted unit is $140,000, down from the town's original purchase price of $156,500. Although the town's housing division distributed 19 lottery packets to prospective buyers, only one completed application was submitted by last week's deadline. The town is prepared to cancel the April 8 lottery and award the unit to the sole applicant, according to Nina Timm, the town's housing coordinator. She says the town has given the buyer until April 2 to respond to the town's offer. If the applicant declines, Timm says the town is prepared to reopen the lottery application process in June when interest in the unit may be higher than in April or May. For more information, contact Timm at 479-2144. RECYCLED PAPER TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 - 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 31, 1999 Contact: Russell Forrest, 479-2146 Community Development Director TOV PARK, HOUSING ACTIONS CONTINUE ON AROSA-GARMISCH SITE WITH REZONING CONSIDERATIONS (Vail)--A request to annex and rezone portions of the town-owned Arosa-Garmisch property for a combined neighborhood park and six-unit employee housing development will be considered by the Vail Town Council at its April 6 evening meeting. The ordinances are among a series of steps required by the town for development of the property. The West Vail site is among 11 parcels recommended for housing by the town's Common Ground public involvement process. Citizens also asked that a portion of the site be developed as a pocket park. The smallest portion of the Arosa-Garmisch property, currently zoned primary/secondary, was acquired by the town in 1990, while the remainder was acquired in 1997 as part of a land exchange with the U.S. Forest Service. That portion of the property currently remains outside the town's boundaries. At its April 6 meeting, the Town Council will be asked to consider first reading of ordinances that would annex the former Forest Service property and establish zoning for the property as outdoor recreation in anticipation of the neighborhood park. A third ordinance has been drafted that, if approved, would rezone the other portion of the (more) RECYCLEDPAPER Arosa/Garmisch Site/Add 1 property to residential cluster to allow for construction of a fourplex and a duplex. While the property is currently zoned for five dwelling units plus four allowable employee housing units, the rezoning would allow for a total of seven dwelling units, one more than the number of units proposed by the town. Town planners say the rezoning request is not intended to increase development rights, but rather to modify the current layout of the four primary/secondary lots to, allow for a cluster of townhomes, which maximizes the area available for the neighborhood park. Members of the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the requests at their March 22 meeting and voted 5-0 to forward the ordinances to the Town Council with the stipulation that Council explore all mechanisms to ensure the park portion of the property remain as a park in perpetuity. As a result, staff will recommend that land used for the park be deed restricted as such. In addition to the Town Council's review of the three ordinances at its April 6 meeting, next steps in the review schedule include selection of a development team on April 13 and second reading of the annexation and rezoning ordinances on April 20. Ground breaking for construction of the park and housing components is targeted for July 1999. For more information, contact Russell Forrest, Community Development Director, at 479-2146. i~ TOWN OF PAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VAIL NEWS BRIEFS - 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 March 31, 1999 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office DOWD JUNCTION RECREATION PATH REOPENED AFTER WINTER SEASON; TEMPORARY CLOSURE SCHEDULED MAY 14-JUNE 10 FOR DEER MIGRATION The Dowd Junction recreation path has reopened to users this week after being closed since Nov. 11 for the winter season. However, the path will require a brief closure from May 14 to June 10 to allow for completion of a deer migration study by state biologists. That study will determine the length of migration closures in the future as directed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. TOV ADDS 4:30 AM BUS ROUTE FOR EASTER SUNRISE SERVICES For those attending Easter Sunrise services on Vail Mountain Sunday, the Town of Vail will offer added bus service at 4:30 a.m. on the outlying West Vail and East Vail routes. The gondola will open at 4:30 a.m. to transport worshipers to the mountaintop service, which begins at 6 a.m. Both the bus service and gondola ride are free. For more information, contact the Vail Transit Office at 479-2358, or the Vail Activities Desk at 476-9090. U.S. FOREST SERVICE TO PRESENT PLANS ON BOOTH CREEK BURN APRIL 6 Representatives from the U.S. Forest Service are scheduled to present an update on the Booth Creek burn during the April 6 evening meeting of the Vail Town Council. The burn is scheduled to take place during the next several weeks to enhance the bighorn sheep habitat. For details, contact Tom Johnston, wildlife biologist with the U.S. Forest Service at 827-5715. VAIL BUS SCHEDULE TRANSITIONS UNDERWAY The Town of Vail is transitioning its transit operations from peak winter service to end-of-season levels beginning April 5. "Summer" service levels will be implemented April 5-18, followed by implementation of the off-season "spring" schedule, April 19-May 30. The summer schedule will return on May 31 and continue to Dec. 8. For more information, contact the Vail Transit Office at 479-2358. FREE PARKING RETURNS TO VAIL PARKING STRUCTURES APRIL 18 Free parking will return to the Vail Village and Lionshead structures beginning at 6 p.m. April 18. The Town of Vail Finance Department will process the return of Blue and Gold passes through June 30. Although ineligible for end-of-season refunds, all value passes with unused credits will be honored next ski season. For more information, contact the Finance Department at 479-2120. 4 RECYCLEDPAPER W qVAIL TOWN 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 - 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 MEDIA ADVISORY March 30, 1999 Contact: Nina Timm, 479-2144 Town of Vail Housing Coordinator EAST VAIL "BUY-DOWN" UNIT COULD BE AWARDED TO SOLE APPLICANT One person has submitted an application to participate in the Town of Vail's upcoming housing lottery for the town's first "buy-down" unit, a two-bedroom condominium in East Vail. The sales price for the deed-restricted unit is $140,000, down from the town's original purchase price of $156,500. Although the town's housing division distributed 19 lottery packets to prospective buyers, only one completed application was submitted by last week's deadline. The town is prepared to cancel the April 8 lottery and award the unit to the sole applicant, according to Nina Timm, the town's housing coordinator. She says the town has given the buyer until April 2 to respond to the town's offer. If the applicant declines, Timm says the town is prepared to reopen the lottery application process in June when interest in the unit may be higher than in April or May. For more information, contact Timm at 479-2144. RECYCLED PAPER TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 26, 1999 Contact: Patrick Hamel, 479-2333 TOV Environmental Health Specialist TOV SEEKS CANDIDATES FOR MAURI NOTTINGHAM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AWARD; NOMINATIONS DUE APRIL 26 (Vail)--Citizen nominations are now being accepted for the valleywide Mauri Nottingham Environmental Quality Award. The award is. presented annually to recognize outstanding actions or programs that protect the valley's environment. Coordinated by the Town of Vail, the award is sponsored this year by Holy Cross Energy, FirstBank of Vail and Images of Nature. Nominations are due April 26 in three categories: 1) individual; 2) corporate or 3) student, ages 5-18. To nominate a person, group or business, simply write a brief letter containing the following information: name and address of nominee; your name and phone number; brief description of. the action or project; and a description of the demonstrated benefits of the project or action. Nominees need not be located within the Town of Vail, so long as the program or action produced an environmental benefit within the Vail Valley. Nominations may be mailed to: Town of Vail, 75 S. Frontage Rd., Vail, Colo., 81657 or faxed to the Town of Vail at 479-2452. Examples might include energy or water conversation; waste reduction or recycling; conservation of dirty burning fireplaces; car pooling programs or use of alternative forms of (more) RECYCLED PAPER Mauri Nottingham Award/Add 1 transportation; volunteer work for environmental education programs; or habitat improvement, among others. An award committee will review the nominations and select the winners. Each category winner will receive a plaque, townwide recognition at an award ceremony June 1 and one of the following prizes: a $250 savings bonds from FirstBank of Vail; a framed photograph from Images of Nature; and from Holy Cross Energy, a $250 credit on the winner's electric bill. The Mauri Nottingham award was created in 1994 and is named for the founder of the We Recycle program. Past recipients have included: the Johnson family of Eagle for its land trust conservation efforts; Byron Brown of Vail for coordination of the annual Eagle Valley Rummage Sale; Ken Neubecker of Eagle for his participation in the Eagle River Clean-up; Kerry Donovan of Vail for her work with the Division of Wildlife in monitoring water quality on the Eagle River; students of the Eagle Valley High School Bio-Building and wetlands projects; John Wright of Vail for his volunteer work with the River Watch and Nature Center programs; the Antlers at Vail for its fireplace conversion program; Coyote Cafe in Beaver Creek for its adopt-a-highway efforts; and the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens for it numerous environmental efforts. If you have any questions about the award, or would like to make a nomination, please contact Patrick Hamel in the Town of Vail Community Development Department at 479-2333. TOWN OF PAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 TOWN OF VAIL NEWS BRIEFS 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 March 31, 1999 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Information Office _ DOWD JUNCTION RECREATION PATH REOPENED AFTER WINTER SEASON;. TEMPORARY CLOSURE SCHEDULED MAY 14-JUNE 10 FOR DEER MIGRATION The Dowd Junction recreation path has reopened to users this week after being closed since Nov. 11 for the winter season. However, the path will require a brief closure from May 14 to June 10 to allow for completion of a deer migration study by state biologists. That study will determine the length of migration closures in the future as directed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. TOV ADDS 4:30 AM BUS ROUTE FOR EASTER SUNRISE SERVICES For those attending Easter Sunrise services on Vail Mountain Sunday, the Town of Vail will offer added bus service at 4:30 a.m. on the outlying West Vail and East Vail routes. The gondola will open at 4:30 a.m. to transport worshipers to the mountaintop service, which begins at 6 a.m. Both the bus service and gondola ride are free. For more information, contact the Vail Transit Office at 479-2358, or the Vail Activities Desk at 476-9090. U.S. FOREST SERVICE TO PRESENT PLANS ON BOOTH CREEK BURN APRIL 6 Representatives from the U.S. Forest Service are scheduled to present an update on the Booth Creek burn during the April 6 evening meeting of the Vail Town Council. The burn is scheduled to take place during the next several weeks to enhance the bighorn sheep habitat. For details, contact Tom Johnston, wildlife biologist with the U.S. Forest Service at 827-5715. VAIL BUS SCHEDULE TRANSITIONS UNDERWAY The Town of Vail is transitioning its transit operations from peak winter service to end-of-season levels beginning April 5. "Summer" service levels will be implemented April 5-18, followed by implementation of the off-season "spring" schedule, April 19-May 30. The summer schedule will return on May 31 and continue to Dec. 8. For more information, contact the Vail Transit Office at 479-2358. FREE PARKING RETURNS TO VAIL PARKING STRUCTURES APRIL 18 Free parking will return to the Vail Village and Lionshead structures beginning at 6 p.m. April 18. The Town of Vail Finance Department will process the return of Blue and Gold passes through June 30. Although ineligible for end-of-season refunds, all value passes with unused credits will be honored next ski season. For more information, contact the Finance Department at 479-2120. RECYCLED PAPER ~L.,`? L1a L O 1999 DONALD L. MOORE, JR.~ ?/CCOf~OJYIIPIl ~ ~ Lt v - C March 22, 1999 Chief of Police Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Subject: Case # 99-0946 Dear Chief, My family and I have been coming to Vail for the past thirty years. Every one of our trips has been a pleasant experience and unmarred by any unfortunate incidences. Earlier this month, while staying at Talisman Condominiums, we had the unfortunate experience of having an intruder - a thief - enter our unit. Upon discovering that we had been burglarized, I immediately called 911 to seek assistance. Officer John L. Dodson responded in an extremely short period of time. He was most professional, caring and very efficient in handling the situation. My wife and I were impressed. Although the perpetrator is still at large, Officer Dodson and two of his associates did recover the items that had been taken from our condominium. My compliments to you and your department for a quick, caring and professional response to our problems. A special thank you to Officer Dodson for his assistance. Sincerely, DONALD L. MOORE, JR., INC. Donald L. Moore`Jr., President DLM/dlh CC: John L. Dodson Town Manager 200 East St. Julian Street Suite 524 Savannah, Georgia 31401 912-234-7815 fax 912-232-7799 Sanndoy6unam•. March 13-14. 19-" • 1heAsper, limes 5-A BELIEVE Iff I'OR NO' I 'lo ASPEN'S A LEADER IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ¦ ASPEN'S EFFORTS ARE A MODEL FOR OTHER RESORTS Looking for In both communities a dedlrat funding source allows the housing a place to live? programs to purchase land and xw- ally build units. The consistent An AFFORDABLE funding also precludes the loss of momentum and opportunity that lace to live? p occurs when housing programs stop and start as they have at other You're NOT alone. resort. Both Aspen and Telluride direct By Sarah S. Chung a percentage of a citvwide. sales tax } Aspen Times Staff Writer •to fund theiraffordable-housing Aspen's shortage of affordable investments. - - „ housing is a painful fact of life. It Aspen splits a .45-percent sales haunts those who want to move tax with the city's dal-care pro- here. those who want to stay here gram. Last year about about $1.7 b - and those who are desperately million was raised from the sales trying to hire enough employees to tax with half going into housing keep their bus' cesses muting here. authority coffers: in addition a 1 percent real estate transfer tax yield- " But if Aspen's situation looks - ed S4.2 million towards Aspen's and feels - grim from the inside. housing cause. In 1998. Telluride the view from afar is different. To collected 5400.000 from its half- .I those in other. sinulac towns. Aspen cent sales tax. 9~ is doing the best job of solving the And the money makes all the m. differencePtubIe From all accounts the response 'Those discussions of what tr. to the affordable-host m shortage do. what's most efficient. how best The Marolt , Is part of Aspen's solution to the problem of finding housing for seasonal here is viewed as the model to fop- to achieve certain goals can be 6us- workers. James Paussa photo. low in resorts throughout the West. mating:' said David Carter, Eagle For normal working people who County housing coordinator. "But want to five in a community where in other communities those discus- some people spend serious money sions don't go the next step. They to relax for a few weeks and others just don't happen. Things sort of gc "Without affordable housing I think Aspen would look like an spend even more to ownsecond (or around in circles because the third) homes. the the quest for mcnev'sriot dtere" EMPTY THEME PARK. If we lost our locals sleeps quarters can be r m But the public money is only But the e battle e to to carve out a half the answer. The other compo- niche for people not able to pay nent is private mitigation - admit- 1T WOULD BE THE END OF ASPEN." morons fora place to live t hart had twit with some public arm-twist more success in Aspen than else- ing involved where. The other key component tc "We love to agonize over the increasing the supply of affordablt John Bennett, Aspen mayor details here. that's just the way we housing has been government regu are but sometimes we lose track of lations that require the private sectoi the bigger picture." said Aspen to construct deed-restricted unto Mayor John Bennett. whenever thev build free-market "I'm not saying the housing pro- homes or commercial projects. Tht grant s perfect. It certainly could be logic is that new homes and busi better. We've all seen the errors nesses create a need for additions made recently and that demands workers and so the people w'hc better performance.... But on the build those homes and busines-se: other hand it's important to step have to "mitigate" the impacts bJ back and recognize that from Mon- providing some deed-restricted terev to Nantucket. people study affordable housing. and emulate our program" In Telluride. all com mecial pro In a more localized comparison. jests must provide housing for 41 the Western resort that comes in percent of the employees generates second to Aspen in terns of afford- by that development. In Aspen bod able units has less than half as many residential and commercial project deed-restricted homes as have been must cover at least 60 percent of thr built and dedicated for Aspen affordable-housing need employees. Partly. of course. that's Other resorts have hesitated td because the Aspen/Pitkin County impose such strict requirements Housing Authority has had up to a yielding to the argument that at 20-vear head start on some Westem affordable-housing requirement cat resort housing programs. destroy the potential profit of mos But still the numbers are surpris- development projects. ing. The Aspen area has roughly That may be the case in othe 1500 units of deed-restricted hots- parts of the world comments Tel ing for those who are punching the luride's planning director Steve Fer time clocks at area businesses. Tel- his, but the stiles are diffeem whet luride comes in next with 700 deed- home buyers are willing to shell on restricted units: Vail is third with millions for houses or even fo. 356 units: Park City has constructed empty lots. 220 units, and Breckenridge can lay "Forget relying on the rules o claim to 114 units. the free market when the situation it already so skewed and whacket The figs stuff from the amount of money So what are two things that involved," Ferris said "rhe goy Aspen and Telluride's housing pro- ernment does much less damagr grams have that other nearby resorts getting involved than if things wert don't? Money and "mitigation." left to the whims of the fire marker Debate on how to give the worts- The reality is that the demand is ing stiff a chance in housing mar- pushing out any sense of affmdabil kets where residential sales can ity out any level." average $2 million and individual Dave Tolen, executive direco estates can sell for $20 million and of Aspen's lousing audtotity, sug . more has been going on for Bests that if affordable-housin: decades. requirements have slowed th But in Aspen and Telluride the . development industry, that's nc discussion has moved beyond talk, necessarily a bad thing. bevond forams and task forces to "I think our measures were an study the problem. ¦ see r ae ft ao poW 17,A I" the Amen runes • smudavSmdav. march lard, 1999 r We Appreciate Aspen Friends of Our Sponsor CIR&elp USA V Presidential c! Linda & David Cornell u'r Greg Erwin Thank you for opening your hearts Sheldon & Christy Gordon to abused children and making R Diane & Bruce Halle our February 14 event ~4. ry Alex Kaufman Virginia & Don Kellner T F. Sue & Kit Parry A Celebration of Love r r`.. Hallie & Robert Parker a great success. Jean Trousdale Proceeds will provide therapy Dorothy Wildman for abused children in our valley. _ We are fortunate to sonal have many helping hands. Snnare9' H.C. Chanen Beth Dozorea John Elmore c: 1) Id Aspen's largest houaft prefect. Hunter Bob Fink We Thank our Contributors. Creek (backgrttuW) Is one of the oldest Janos Pauuaa photo. Marlene & Fred Malek Ann Miller Queen's Floral of Miami HUU n Aubery O'Connor John Anthony Creations a7 / ( Pat & Ed Peterson Linda & Stuart Resnick of Franklin Mint John Provine Barbara Grimes - Gossamer Wings tented ¦ by . long-term residents. ~ But training. cost the turnover cost of mill recruiting, Ellen Roeser Gwen Sharp ions ons might instead of setting specific numbers be stretching it but I'd be comfort- Pat Rymer Marta Ortega - Bulgari Jewelry of affordable-housing units as able saying hundreds of thousands Albert Sanford Judith Ripka Design goals, Park City strives for a are lost" "diverse -_c commun- According to Laing the damage ity." Steamboat. Breckenridge, of high employee tmrover because Keystone and Vail are all in the of housing problems is one that midst of re-evaluating their goals. cannot be stressed enough in terms In Aspen, 36 percent of the area's of a _ve edge. employees are living in the city's "Everyone has wonderfully deed-restricted units. The Aspen groomed slopes and high-speed t Area Community Plan gar goal of lifts. The distinction L. is guest ser- • • ~i eslV e ~Jsl QL e 60 percent Telluride's master plan vices," noted Laing. "All the leat[_ ~ 0 • goal is to have a 60 percent to 70 we receive, with a few exceptions. percent year-rand occupancy rare- are about guest services.- So. besides recognizing that it's - Ime or r -the right thing to do." the Skico's - In each of these resorts, the local owners needed no convincing that ski ..,,...r-, is either the biggest or providing housing makes good busi- _ second biggest employer in town. ness sense. Currently the Skico's But only Vail Resorts and Aspen housing stock is just 85 beds, bui - Skiing Co. voluntarily embarked 500 more bedrooms are in some on their own housing programs. stage of planning or development - And that is one area in which On other ski compan fronts. Vail has a very significant lead. American Skiing Co.. which own, _ - r VR (which owns and operates Steamboat along with a number o? Vail. Beaver Creek. Keystone. and other resorts across the country. ha~':i Breckenridge) provides 13M beds constructed 350 bedrooms. Utah'• o - in Eagle County and 1200 in Sum- Powder Corp_ as a result of Pao _ mit County for its employees. This City housing requirements. now - means that a quarter of V R-s offers employees 60 beds. Accord- 10.000 employees are offered hous- ing to Telluride's planning depart- ing. (Vail counts bedrooms, rather men[ the employee-housing effort _s= .than housing units, because it has a of the Telluride Ski and Golf Co prevalence of dormitory-Style has yet to have any effect within Over 10 acres of aspens, pines, meadows, stream, and ponds. Furnished, five bedroom, .y,a for its work force.) city limits. five bath home in a private gated community. High vaulted ceilings, large windows for Far from it being a humanitarian those lake and alpine views, custom gourmet kitchen, balconies, outside hot tub, and gesture, VR Housing Coordinator D1Hlartt, but vital attached one bedroom apartment. Jack Lewis says the housing effort Having a tough time with hous- Ruedi South Shore $899,995 is simply good business. "It's seen ing is not a new topic in resort Contact Kent Schuler for more information. as a real benefit in recruiting and communities but the stakes keeping good emplovees," said involved ensure that it's a subjeci Lewis. "It's a large pan of why that won't go away anytime soon. . 6...~ ASPEN we're the number one resat in the "Without affordable housing I comity " think Aspen would look like ar The Aspen Skiing Co. recog- empty theme park. It would literal- REAL ESTATE nizes the benefit of : L_g boos- ty be a ghost town." Barnett said 7~ ,rte ing - but it does so from the "We would lose our vitality; wt COMPANY wrong side of the issue, because the would lose our realness. We'd stcT Skico can only house a small per- being a community and just be a :7S,, 6,iperls on l~ounlain Giuin9 centage of its employees and the tesott company knows that it's hurting "We would lose the .....r.f.d, .7ten! cSclu/er Open 7 days a week. because of that- colorful cast of characters we call E.,i 7uoGe~ 205 South Mill Street v Aspen, Colorado 81611 "It's without question the largest our neighbors and really J.:ng 9 issue we have," said Jim Laing, that makes Aspen so special. If we 970/920-2006 • Fax 970/925-3531 www.aspenexperts.conn Skico vice president of human lost an locals it would be the end - - resources. " fo quantify the oppor- of Aspen. ' , u n BEFORE At Home On Earth - : N Presents A Practical Guide To: GUNN WASA Fen g ET Health Homes ,N , g Y = 4 NERO, ' with Tricia McKenzie FIRST TIME n.t~~ l`- Consultation, Design, MentorshiP• Products CowniV dw rove snrce 1881 Call Toll Free: 1-888-248-1072 • Town of Vail Sales Tax Worksheet 4/1/99 % Change % Change 1999 Budget from from Month 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992. 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Budget Collections Variance 1998 Budget January 1,126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,855,364 1,805,707 1,894,597 1,935,782 2,052,569 2,115,359 2,188,943 2,040,410 (148,533) -3.54% -6.79% February 1,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,828,766 1,814,495 1,816,107 1,993,389 2,089,673 2,153,121111 2,228,041 1,980,580 (247,461) -8.01% 11% .r { 1 Total 2,331,597 3,027156 3.294,973 3.450,434 3,490,222 3,684,130 3,620,202 3,710,704 3,929,171 4,142,242 4,268,4801 4,416,984 4,020,990 (395,994) -5.80% -8.97% March 1,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 1,988,090 2,250,656 2,139,298 2,240,865 2,580,992 2,368,0771 2,450,164 April 550,205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 864,303 794,668 791,092 966,993 874,427 1,107,3341 1,145,861 May 170,567 215,548 236,359 250,809 268,000 257,248 287,315 324,681 318,920 329,783 382,7181 396,027 June 329,039 393,470 448,227 468,948 468,598 475,161 548,820 590,685 594,907 630,366 633,4001 655,430 July 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 811,538 892,830 893,483 963,717 1,043,637 1,107,8821 1,146,156 August 575,887 668,119 678,071 761.992 767257 825,954 891,566 867,125 990,650 1,073,430 1,183,9261 1,224,834 September 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 645,902 630,453 637,831 735,6081 760,913 October 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367,578 400,525 408,405 461,791 413,573 472,836 515,5311 532,652 November 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 497,907 553,681 594,491 611,147 601,208 707,166 656,5961 678,336 December 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,775 1,846,223 1,974,553 1,992,855 1,994,540 2,068,851 2,254,709 2,070,834+ 2,132,272 3 Total 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,603,647 12,395,718 13,007,013 13,030,448 13,719,308 14,747,419 15,030,386115,539,629 4,020,990 11,518,639 Memorandum To: Town Council From Nina Timm Andy Knudtsen Date: April 2, 1999 Subject: West Vail Request For Proposals We need a Council member who is interested in reviewing the submitted Request for Proposals on the Arosa-Garmisch site and the A-Frame. Proposals are due on Wednesday, April 7 at Noon. We are going to get together as a group on Friday, April 9 at Noon to review the Proposals. Please call Nina Timm at 479-2144 if you are interested in reviewing the Proposals with the group. 77 7 DRAFT MEDIA ADVISORY April 8, 1999 - Contact: Nina Timm, 479-2144 Town of Vail Housing Coordinator TOV REOPENS APPLICATION PROCESS FOR EAST VAIL BUY-DOWN UNIT Potential buyers of the Town of Vail's first employee housing "buy-down" unit will now have until June 17 to submit an application to compete in a lottery to buy the $140,000 two-bedroom condominium. The decision to reopen the application process was made after the unit's sole applicant from the previous lottery declined to close on the property. Applications were initially collected from March 5 to March 22. And although the town's Housing Division distributed 19 lottery packets to prospective buyers during those two-and-a-half weeks, only one completed application was submitted. As a result, Nina Timm, the town's housing coordinator, says the new application period will be expanded to allow more time for the applicants. "Looking back, the previous schedule may have been a little tight for buyers," she said. "And now with the off- season approaching, we want to make sure we provide ample time for people to complete their applications in addition to the other end-of-season rituals." The new schedule calls for the lottery applications to be collected by noon June 17; then announcement of the lottery tiers on July 2; the lottery drawing on July 8; and contract signing on July 12. The property is located at 4093 Spruce Way in East Vail. It was purchased with unanimous support by the Vail Town Council on March 1 this year for $156,500. The new sales price of $140,000 includes a deed restriction requiring the unit be employee owned and occupied, with an annual resale appreciation cap of three percent. The 816 sq. ft. unit is newly remodeled. It's a top floor unit with two-bedrooms, one-bath, gas heat, fireplace, excellent views, two assigned parking spots, laundry facilities within the building and easy access to the Town of Vail bus system. Monthly condominium dues are $292.11, which includes heat. As an affordable deed restricted unit, the sale will be exempt from the town's real estate transfer tax. To qualify for the lottery, applicants must: • currently own no other real estate in Eagle County • use the residence as an owner-occupied primary home • work in Eagle County a minimum of 30 hours per week over the course of a year and plan to continue working the same amount until the sale of the property or retirement • agree to a re-sale cap of three percent annual appreciation (more) Add 1/Buy-Down Housing Unit The Vail Town Council has set aside $100,000 in the 1999 budget to purchase and re-sale up to 5 units this year, which provides a "buy down" subsidy of up to $20,000 per unit. In addition to the possibility of additional buy-down units later in the year, the Town of Vail's lottery schedule includes a plan for the sale of six yet-to-be-constructed units at the Arosa-Garmisch site, plus two units at the A-frame site during the fall. For more information on Vail's housing lottery program or to request an application, contact Nina Timm in the Town of Vail Housing Division at 479-2144. CIC COL- RAD.O''W FI SAN _ ; , . ; , ` OOU CIL OF a , . I TS, -O RNIVIEN 01 M n'ner,of a 199866yemor's Smart,., .Growih and'Development-Awar;I- - S'012Y12'NehtCllj"/ ` y aL r 1+ In,199K 'the Nor'thwesf'Coloradc, Council `of-Governments conducted a-cost of liy-ing ,r, ' study iri, eighf mountain communities. The y L. ethodolog' income; -used consumer profiles, based al zed nds :and on which- an tre spending pattei:6-i r four basic'categorie's; c~ • Housing;,Taxes personal.Car; and Goods Servceso.. ° ou-sit ' •the~, - The.resultsof the study'clearl, iildicated ~UO~k~U,rCe in in. these n ' ~i • , . that, the lugfi casts of Housing t t> o m m (n r communities are raising the overall cost 'o'f m * y°t • hying. Costs in the other'categories are not f w o 1(x:1®' nt'a1n° sgru~icaridy *htgller'tlian°natlonal 'standards o, a c~ 'Housing ryas found,to be as high ags%369% M1 d • ~ a ~ r- > Co 1~1]~1Li1'lltl~ Of national°stan dardS lii,•Aspe,1,'23bln Telluride and 200% In Breckenridge. (To' e z e 0` download a copy of the study, go-'to the d , 4 1 'x NWCCOG.website at wwwnwc.cog.co:usr) ~p • < a .q. + `s FJ~ .a. p N„ •~4'~° r " ? S'• ..r-t. '•A• Y't. ' In'this worksh'p ve~vill.exgldre;the challenges of providing I affordable\attainablehousing.for :the Q,' U _ U y L, y workers who live in'tlese mountain Friday, :1VIay 7,th,.1999 . communities. Who is:in:need and what can' 3 o -we. do -about it Are there- success'stories out = c'J 0 0 o there? How have thef done-it. an these' ' : The `ManorNail-Lodge. , ° 2 595 E. Vail Valley Drive.' models'be repli cated? _ ° ' : , AG A f:.. { • ; GF,NF,R'A'T - REGIS l'xATION - ,.a..: INFOTION. FOxM: •a l • ~ ' '4. ua Q ' 10:0W "Registration and coffee .Registration: IVfail or faX a completed - "A , OUR in the; Workforce " e form,to: NWCCOG,'Box 2308, F I a . ` ' " .Silverthorne;•CO 80498; in'.Mountari 10:15 Welcome and Introductions p a.e FAX,(970) 468°1208: Communities' t Make: checks payable'to'NWCCOG:. 4 40:30 Panel One: "Me Basics" : Please r4ster'l Y.Apj .30, 1999. I ' Phone:,(9.70}:468-0295.. i Frid`ay, May ?th,1999 a What do'we mean•'by a . _ I The Marion Vail Lodge • Affordable Housing? s ° Directions. From 1-70,ttake exit #176; Iv I 595 E. Vail Valley Drive ' enter-into the roundabout(s),, exit onto Termmnology,,+Targeting,'Needs " e Soiitli Frontage Road East. Pass Vail j o- "Asses meat ;`'Typed of h°ousing, etc. "F Parking Structure and Tian"sportation .Name: ' . ' . : a Centeron• right. At the first: stop sign make 12:00 Lunch Break . ` a:nglit turn bnto. Vail Valley Drive,`follow , • _ 4 0 road' approximatefy'/4 in le'to Manor.Vail'• . L. - ' :1:00. Paris Two: "P•erspectives" I Company/Agency: Q: . Lodge: (Se~,rriap'below.)„' L. _ fl WhoyNeeds to .be lrivolved+ and _ f < b , a a " what, Special Challenges„do. we . , ° Riv Bahn'Quad ° r4 face iriaVlountain, o f- 7o Golf courss'p.. Chair Ltt' Vista Balm I Address: ColYllYlunities? . t . .a r rea 5hutde Sto 4 Manor Vail VAIL ousin r ParR VII LAGS I - ' A P. Employ,'.Developers; H g - cr°°K\ m Authorities,•Undeis, Planners; Elected ' ,heaar C44 • o la o I' Occals CtG : . Vail`' . 9 from East VaiL Transportalon I F' Exit #180 Center Roundabout Phone/E-mail a' -'South Frontape;Roatl d I i 2:15 Break - - - L' w ~ o" tad I'' s I e 4 Exit #176.Y v 2:30,' Parcel Three: Success,&6iie' " " ' I'. • ; a _ , What woiks`and why. a . . ` • a Registration Fee , I'hea$35 00,registration I Registration Fee: '$35.00 (includes lnncti) Adjourn . fee includes. lunch. a ' • I b 4.00". . 1~7A~ V t/ Vail Associates, Inc. Dear Mill Creek Circle Neighbor, To facilitate the reconstruction of Two Elk Lodge and maintain the aggressive schedule necessary to complete the project by next Christmas, we need your help. Deliveries will be arriving and we must stage them for the trip up the mountain. The delay between "drop off" and "move up the hill" will be short, but nonetheless necessary. In order to accomplish this we need to use the space adjacent to the bottom of the Vista Bahn known as the ABC lot as well as portions of the road between the Golden Peak Pumphouse and the ABC lot for material drops. We will not use the Mill Creek,Circle for access. If you have any concerns or require further explanation please call Steve Lorton or Jeff Babb at 479-4000. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Setting the Brian McCartney Standard for Senior Managing Director of Mountain Operations, Vail World Class Alpine Resorts! BMC:sal CC: Leonard Sandoval, T.O.V. Pam Brandmeyer, T.O.V. David Corbin Paul Testwuide i 10-11-5, PO Box 7 • Vail, Colorado • 81658 • phone 970 476 5601 0 Breckenn dge ja offle Va*l ip I s its PI;RR~ RESORT from Page 1 B already built doesn't do much. for n*," he said.. oz Vail Resorts Development Co., noted that But perhaps the most controversidissue .the community and town government is the desire of resort officials to tt2nsfer benefit from having a vibrant and compet- development rights to the mountainside itive ski resort in town" but said the resort which would allow a dense development had to continue reinvesting through such far from town, in apparent contradiction lucrative condo projects. of the Upper Blue River Master Pl#n. "The reality for all ski areas is their To comply, however, Vail would ii ed to base-area improvements are being funded buy development rights from private land= by`real-estate development," Jensen said, owners elsewhere in the valley -ta cost pointing to similar projects under way at estimated at between $3 =*11ion anti $S Copper Mountain, Keystone and Winter million by West but a deal breaker, resort Park. officials said of `;Leading the charge, however, West and "That's 60,000 skiers at $50 aiece. ".Councilman Sam Mamula said amenities That's nothing. There are hundreds of mil- as walkways along the Blue River lions of dollars that could be made in this an resort improvements would be under- real-estate deal.... You guys ptrobably taken in any case and were not true con- have a million. bucks in this book," West cessions. said, holding up the full-color development "I think some of these pretty obviously plan. are not benefits, one way or another," Ma- Resort officials said they couldrbuild mula said, adding that a proposed gondola what has already been approved for their might actually be negative. property, spread out and ununified, but Alluding to the town's awful parking they aren't inclined to go in that direction. crunch, West said his heart would be more "Twenty years from now I wanelome- "aflutter" if the resort offered to build a body to look back at my work and Jhink, three-story, underground parking struc- 'They were thoughtful.. They madsome ture rather than recreation facilities. good decisions,' instead of, `What. tlib hell "Building an ice rink after the two we've were they thinking.?' " Jensen said. j THE DENVER POST AND THE o n .1 i'i" n e www.denverpost.com 5 19 SECTION .B, THE DENVER OST Kam, AV M k', e Bre%. 11.1ri an,_, s, vwere. By Steve Lipsher ! P t i nancing and to allow Vail Resorts to trans= . Denver Post Staff Writer ~o n officials grill Vail Resort'. S fer building rights from parcels in town up,., BRECKENRIDGE - The town .council 1 to the mountainside. i; on Tuesday flayed Vail Resorts officials "If this concept doesn',t set your heart,.,,j,~ over a massive proposed condominium de-, 'own? said Mayor Steve West, suggesting and rebuild the Peak 8.base area and con- aflutter and it's too much, maybe everyone,-;I; velopment at the base of the Breckenridge . s that katingor ink and amenities recreation center are pansion oniPeak 7, inel ding about 850 ski- Bill Jen en, thetch of or eratigng officer for :,11 ski area, pointedly questioning whether its.... p g residents would benefit fromahe project. being. offered too late"after the town al- in/ski-out condominiums, retail shops, ho- the ski area. . ready has' built its -own- : tels and a gondola from town. In a special council work.'' session' that' "What is it that this community is get- grew confrontational at times, Jensen and ting back, other than staying competitive Vail Resorts, which owns 250 acres of But to pull off 'the ambitious proposal Roger Beck, the local point man' for. the . , - (as a ski resort), which is important but undeveloped land adjacent to the ski area, the resort needs,,town officials to approve ~ which I doubt Vail wouldn't do on its earlier this month unveiled plans to raze establishing a special district for the fi- Please See RESORT on 12B j ii