Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-12-07 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session ~ ~VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1999 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS . REVISED AGENDA NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1 • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. (5 mins.) 2. CONSENT AGENDA: (5 mins.) A. Approve the Minutes from the meetings of November 2 and 16, 1999. 3. Appoint Two Members to the Vail Local Marketing District Advisory Pam Brandmeyer Board. (5 mins.) 4• Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1999, first reading of An Ordinance Making Steve Thompson Supplemental Appropriations And Budget Adjustments From The Town Of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, And Health Insurance Fund Of The 1999 Budget And The Financial Plan For The Town Of Vail, Colorado; And Authorizing The Expenditures Of Said Appropriations As Set Forth Herein; And Setting Forth Details In Regard Thereto. (15 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/Modify/Deny Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1999, on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This is the final supplemental appropriation for 1999. Supplemental appropriations are needed to account for expenditures that were not anticipated when the budget was originally prepared. Many of the Town's required supplemental appropriations are caused by and funded by unanticipated revenue such as grants and sales. All of the supplementals in the General Fund are of this type. Supplementals are also needed for unanticipated expenditures such as the upgrade to the permits software for $66,000. The balance of supplementals is needed for expenditures that will exceed budget estimates such as the $120,000 needed for health claims. As you may recall, we are self-insured for health claims and must pay what is incurred up to a certain point. For many years, our health claims had done much better than budget, but not this year. . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1999 on first reading. 5• Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1999, first reading of an Ordinance rezoning Dominic Mauriello for property previously unzoned and owned by the United States Forest Tom Moorhead Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Prima ry/Seconda ry Residential District and Natural Area Preservation District (NAPD), for property located at Rockledge Road/ A replat af a portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing and Lot 2 of Raether minor subdivision affecting lots 2, 4, 7, 8A and 9A, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing; Lots 3A and 3B, Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 10A, Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 13B Resubdivision of Lot 13 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; and Government 3 Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. and A rezoning for property previously unzoned and owned by the United States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District and Natural Area Preservation District (NAPD), for property located at Ptarmigan Road/ Lots 1 through 6, Block 5, Vail Village Seventh Fi(ing, replat of Lot 4, Vail Village Tenth Filing and Government Lot 3; all in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. (45 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCIL: Approve/Modify/Deny Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1999 on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: See attached memo. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zoning requests subject to the following finding: , That the proposed zone districts are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area. 6. Ordinance No. 36, Series of 1999, an ordinance amending Title 10, Building Gary Goodell Regulations, of the Municipal Code, to provide for some relatively minor updates and "clean-up" amendments to the town's adopted building codes. The ordinance is tentatively scheduled for 2"d reading on December 22 and is proposed to be effective for all building permit applications received after January 1, 2000. (10 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions or deny Ordinance No. 36, series of 1999, on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The model codes that are administered. by the town shoufd be updated on a regutar basis in order to stay current with changing construction technologies and the latest nationally recognized minimum safety standards. Major new editions of the 8 model codes that the town adopts are published every 3 years. The town updated its building, fire, mechanical and plumbing codes to the most current editions with Ordinance 98-19, which became effective 1/1/99. The National Electrical Code, or NEC, is published on a slightly different schedule. It is proposed that the town adopt the most recent 1999 edition of the NEC to replace our current adoption of the 1996 NEC. In addition, a number of "clean up" amendments are proposed to eliminate some inconsistencies in the current ordinance, which is found under Title 10 of the Town Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Building Safety & Inspection Services Division Team recommends that the Town Council APPROVE Ordinance No. 36, Series of 1999, on first reading. 7• Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance Providing for the Levy Assessment and Collection of Town Ad Valorem Property Taxes Due for the 1999 Tax Year and Payable in the 1999 Fiscal Year. (5 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCIL: Approve/Modify/Deny . Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999 on second reading. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999 on second reading. ! 0. An evening work session to present the redevelopment proposal for the Vail George Ruther Viltage Inn. The purpose of the meeting is to update and inform the Council Tim Losa of the various aspects of the redevelopment application. (1 hr.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Engage in a dialogue with the applicant and the staff regarding the future redevelopment of the Vail Village Inn. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The applicant has appeared on numerous occasions before the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission ' and the Design Review Board for work sessions and conceptual reviews to discuss. the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Village Inn, Phase IV building. The applicant is proposing a major amendment to Special Development District #6 and a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of the Vail Plaza Hotel and the operation of a fractional fee club. During the discussions, the Commission and the Board have provided . input, expressed their concerns and have recommended various alternatives. A summary of the issues discussed to date is attached for reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Engage in a dialogue with the staff and the applicant to seek information and understanding of the current application and proposal. Staff anticipates that the applicant will be before the Planning & Environmental Commission for a final recommendation on December 13 and will be before the Town Council in mid - late December for a work session to continue discussions and to progress through the development review process. 9. Proposed public process for development of a master plan/community Dominic Mauriello facilities plan for ponovan Park. (5 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCIL: Acceptance of proposed process and schedule for development of a detailed master plan for ponovan Park. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town has entered into a contract with Odell Architects, Design Workshop, and Sasaki Architects to develop a master plan and building plans for ponovan Park. This contract includes a public process for arriving at decisions during the planning process. The public process to begin in mid December includes: a programming work session with stakeholders, public open houses (two) to confirm prioritized program, public open houses (two) to provide input on potential design\site plan alternatives, presentations on preferred alternative to the DRB, PEC, Town Council, and public, and a series of hearings with the PEC, DRB, and Council to approve final plans. A detailed schedule will be presented to the Town Council at the meeting. 10. Town Manager's Report. (5 mins.) 11. Adjournment - 9:40 p.m. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL T1MES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TQ CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/14/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12121/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/21/99, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1999 11/16/99 TIMBER RIDGE UPDATEI OVERLAY AFFORDABLE HOUSING ZONE DISTRICT Chuck Ogilby 11116/99 HOT WEDNESDAY NIGHTS Kevin Foley 11/16/99 THANK YOU LETTERS TO BOB/TOM: Schedule Executive Session update re: Timber ELECTION COMMISSION Ridge. What is the timing on presentation of the "affordable Ludwig Kurz & Council housing zone district" formation? LARRY PARDEEIGREG MORRISON/LORELEI: Requests Everything, with the exception of the police support, has been done. You from the WF were made approximately 90 days ago to will note an item in the 12/7199 work session agenda to request either support these free concerts and to include the following: Council contingency or supplemental appropriation funding to provitle 2 officersl3 hoursl18 nights (5:30-8:30 P.M.) - still being security coverage for the 18 free concerts. discussed; Barricades/trash removal - scheduled by Public Works; 2-20 AMP electrical circuits at CheckPoint Charlie - this upgrade has already installed by Public Works; 5 Special Events Permits - the town has up to 10 Special Events Permits (liquor licenses) during a calendar year. 5 have been provided to the Foundation for these events. LORELEI: Asked that we prepare a thank you letter wlhis signature to thank Mary Jo Allen and Karen Morter for their past service on the election commission, and again, for agreeing to continue to serve in that capacity. December 2, 1999, Page 1 PUBLIC NOTICE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE (as of 11 / 19/99) DECEMBER,1999 In an attempt to respond to scheduled meeting demands, as well as adhere to mandated ordinance and charter requirements, Council meetings are scheduled at the following times: EVENING MEETINGS Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each month, starting at 7:00 P.M. These meetings will provide a forum for citizen participation and public audience for conducting regular Council business. WORK SESSIONS Work sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues before the Council, will now be scheduled to begin at 2:00 P.M. (unless otherwise noted) on everv Tuesday afternoon. THE DECEMBER 1999 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE IS AS FOLLOWS: Tuesdav. December 7 1999 wOI'1{ SeSSIOri............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Evening meeting......... 07:00 P.M. Tuesday, December 14 1999 WOI'1{ SeSSIOri............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Tuesda December 21 1999 WOPk SeSSlOri............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Evening meeting......... 07:00 P.M. Tuesdav, December 28 1999 Work session............ NO MEETING DUE TO HOLIDAYS TOWN OF VAIL ~ Pamela A. Brandmeyer Assistant Town Manager ' Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. EAST VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Officers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm Directors - Judith Berkowitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie Caulkins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder To: Town of Vail - Town Council From: Jim Lamont, Executive Director Date: December 7, 1999 RE: Vail Plaza Hotel Special Development District Amendment Proposal The Association's primary concerns with the proposal fall within two general categories. o Impact upon the public traffic circulation and Vail Village loading & delivery systems. o Compliance with prior conditions of approval, Vail Village Master Plan, underlying zone district reqmrements, and the relationship with adjacent properties and improvements The following is recommended to provide sufficient information to make an informed recommendation to the Town Council with respect to these primary concerns. These recommendations will have consequences for setbacks, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, building heights, off site impacts and related matters. 1. The Town of Vail should commission an analvsis bv a traffic-consulting firm to provide a second and independent oqinion with resnect to traffic circulation and safetv issues for the Main Vail roundabout Vail Road and the South Frontage Road. The analvsis should provide design options to resoIve traffc circulation and safetv issues resulting from increased densities approved for Vail Village. The South Frontage Road and Vail Road are critical vehicular links to Vail Village and its surrounding residential neighbarhoods. Currently on Vail Road, during-periods of high traffic, vehicles turning into private driveways can quickly cause the back up of north and southbound traffic. This circumstance causes particular concern for the consequences affecting the main Vail roundabout. Approving minimum building setbacks along Vail Road removes any future option to make unprovements to provide for an efficient and safe traffic flow as well as for an aesthetically appealing presentation to the Vail Road corridar. Allowing large trucks, buses and cars exiting the Phase I parking structure and the site's loading & delivery ternunal to exit by crossing against east bound traffic on the South Frontage Road, near the east exit of the Main Vail roundabout, creates the potential far an unnecessary traffic hazard. 2. An independent analvsis should be conducted to determine the size and configuration of necessarv facilities to be provided on the Vail Plaza Hotel site and methods of appropriate compensation required to mitigate off srte impacts upon the Vail Village loading and deliverv svstem. The growth in the visitor population due to increases in, (recently approved or under consideration) densities for Vail Village and Lionshead will result in a greater demand upon the loading and delivery system for Vail Village. The negative aspects of the current loading and delivery system are adverse to the economic and environmental well being of Vail Village and its surrounding residential neighborhoods. The mitigation of the cumulative effects from redevelopment resulting from increases in the visitor population from the Vail Plaza Hotel and other similar properties is anticipated through regulatory provisions providing for the mitigation of off site impacts upon the loading and delivery system. 3. The intended interconnection between the Vail Plaza Hotel and the earlier phases of the Special Development District, of the parking structures, points of access and circulation routes, aloni! with accompanving repairs and improvements should be required or adeQUate measures to mitigate the resultini! effects should be provided bv the apnlicant and confirmed bv an independent consultant. The lack of the interconnection of interior circulation routes between earlier phases of the Special Development District and the proposed Vail Plaza Hotel places an inappropriate and unnecessary burden upon traffic circulation on adjacent public nght-of-ways. Further, the configuration causes the unsuitable mixing of types of vehicles, reducing the efficiency and safe operation of on-site loading and delivery facilities. The interconnecnon of these routes and points of access was anticipated and provided for in the design and construction of the earlier phases. No agreements restrain or preempt the Town from requiring these interconnections. 4. A summarv of compliance criteria imuosed upon earlier uhases of the Special Develoument District and a report on the deEree of deviation and the iustification thereof from these criteria should be nrovided to the Town Council. The compliance criteria, such as the view corridor defined in the initial Special Development District established for the site, were unposed upon the former owners and adjacent property owners. The rational and criteria applied for the Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorado 81658 Telephone: (970) 827-5680 Message/FAX: (970) 827-5856 . 12/V7/1777 10:~9:13 li ~.3 . . setting aside of the compliance criteria is a matter of fair, consistent, and equal treatment for former owners, adjacent property owners and all property owners in similar circumstances. Compliance criteria include documents and decisions with respect to various phases of the Special Development District, the Vail Village Master Plan, the underlying zone district and collateral requirements placed on adjacent properties. The documentation of changes and amendments to the Special Development Disirict has been reported. However, the deviation or negation of compliance criteria has not been justified as to wazranted changes in conditions, resulting effects, and the public pwpose served. The Association has given testimony to the Planning and Environmental Commission regarding the foregoing tnatteis within the context of the work sessions they have conducted with res~ect to this item. As the authority to initaate action on several of these matters falls ouiside the jurisdiction of the Commission or sta~ they are presented to Council so as to respect its need to give timely consideration to the concems raised by the Association It is respectfully suggested that . because there are a sufficient number of new Towri Conncil members, ceriain reports by consultants and staff with respect to this proposal should be presented and considered as a qual~er to finalizing the Couacil's advisory comments. The fonner Council, due to the pending expiration of their terms, demurred on making advisory comments, seeming to choose . instead to forward the responsibility to the newly elected Council. The Association is piepared to give additional supporting testimony with respect to these matteis. ll TOWN OF VAIL , Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 December 9, 1999 J. Drew Rader, P.E. PO Box 780 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Correspondence of December 1, 1999 , Dear Mr. Rader: Thank you for your letter of December 1, 1999 regarding the 425 GRFA credit found in the ToNvn Code. To clarify the issue, I researched the ordinance that created the 425 sq. ft. credit. Prior to 1990, there were credits for storage, airlocks, wood storage, and 50 sq. ft. for mechanical space. In 1990, an ordinance was passed lumping all of these uses into a single 425 sq. ft. credit which allowed- the land owner to decide how ro use the floor space. The regulation did not include a"minunum area" for mechanical space. The Community Development Department believes you have discovered a major shortcoming of development trends in Vail.. Too much emphasis is being placed on floor area by property owners and not enough on building safety. This issue is important and should require properry owners, architects, and engineers to adequately address mechanical space on development plans. However, we believe that this is best accomplished by architects and engineers, like yourself, educating clients on the minimum mechanical space requirements of the Building Code. The Building and Mechanical Codes contain specific regulations on the minimum space needed depending on the size of the mechanical equipmenL We can all do a better job of communicating existing Building and Mechanical Code provisions to applicants, rather than creating new regulations in the Zoning Code. If you wish to pursue a code amendment on your own, you have the right to submit the appropriate application form and fee to the Town of Vail and we will forward the application to the Planning and Environmental Commission and to the Town Council for their consideration. If you have any questions, please call me at 479-2148. Sin ely, . Do ~c F. auriello, AICP , Chief of Planning ' C: Town Council ~,s~ RECYCGED PAPER ~ - ~ ~ . . . December 7, 1999 Mr. Dave Ozawa • . U. S. Forest Service ' PO Box 190 . ' Minturn, CO 81645 Dear Mr. Ozawa: . I represent two condominium associations in Vail Village which border Vail Road. T'hey are - ' Riva Ridge South and The Willows Condominium Associations. This purpose of this letter is to voice their dispieasure with the CAT III Timber Hauling Route for the summer months in the years 2000 and beyond. This is the route proposed down the front side of Vail Mountain, down Mill Creek road, along Vail Road and through the Roundabout onto . I-70: We are requesting that the timber hauling not be along Vail Road directly behind our " . properties. . This past summer the construction traffic on Vail Road was very noisy and dusty. Many owners and guests complained about the noise and the volume of traffic on this raad. This is a residential neighborhood with units occupied on a nightly basis. The truck traffic started very early in the mornings when people were sleeping and had their windows open since it was szunmer. The disruptions to our guests and owners were numerous. , . The property owners here purchased in this location because it was quiet and private. You are proposing under this alternative to disrupt and cause financial harm to these owners. Therefore, we request that you seek an alternative to this timber hauling route. At this point, bridging over the wetlands seems like the best altemative from your report. • Sincerely, ' . WILLOWS CONDOMINIUMS RIVA RtDGE SOUTH CQNDOMINIUMS Barbara Feeney, CHA . General Manager RECEIVED DEC 91999 ' Cc: All effected homeowners - , WILLOWS ' C O N D O M 1 N 1 U M S 74 Willow Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 • 888-WILLOWS (945-5697) • 970-476-2233 • 970-476-5714 fax email: willows@vail.net • http://vail.net/willows ' Memorandum To: Vail Town Council From: George Ruther, Senior Special Projects Planner Date: December 7, 1999 Re: Vail Plaza Hotel - Information Update The purpose of this memorandum is to update the Town Council on the progress of the development review of the Vail Plaza Hotel, to inform the Council of the issues discussed to date, to forward the preliminary recommendation of the Design Review Board and to identify the next sfeps in the development review process. ISSUES DISCUSSED TO DATE The Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board have held numerous worksession meetings and conceptual reviews to discuss the proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. The major amendment is intended to facilitate the construction of the Vail Plaza Hotel. Over the course of the meetings and reviews the Commission, Board and staff have had the opportunity to comment and provide feedback to the applicant on the redevelopment proposal. The Commission and Board comments are based upon review and consideration of the relevant governing land use regulation documents. Staff, while taking into consideration the land use regulations, has focused primarily on the technical aspects of the proposal (i,e., development standards, zoning compliance/analysis, engineering standards). The following is a summary of the comments and discussions to date: Vail Road Setback In general, the Commissioners disagreed with staff's concem that the proposed fiotel should be required to maintain the required twenty-foot setback along Vail Road or at a minimum meet the criteria recently established for determining setbacks for developments located in the Public Accommodation zone district. The Commissioners believed that the setback was appropriate given the existing development on adjacent properties. Several Commissioners did express an interest, however, in reviewing a landscape plan to insure that the streetscape along Vail Road can be adequately provided and that the applicant address the setback criteria and demonstrate why a setback encroachment should be granted. Since the Commissioners last saw the plans and had an opportunity to comment on the proposed Vail Road setback, staff has discovered a discrepancy in the survey information provided by the applicant. The discrepancy in the survey data does not affect the proposed distance of the hotel from the property line (setback), however, the proposed distance between the hotel and the street has decreased from earlier submittals. ?'he minimum distance proposed from the back of the curb is approximately 16'-6" and the maximum distance is approximately 26'. The width of the right-of-way (back of curb to the property line) is approximately 10'-6". A reduced copy of the Vail Road Setback Study prepared by the applicant has been attached for reference. Building Height The staff had identified a concem with the proposed height of the hotel on several portions of the development site. Generally, staff believed that the applicant should be required to mitigate the negative effects of the proposed hotel height.through design considerations. However, upon reviewing the plans, the Commissioners believed that the proposed height of the hotel was acceptable. Several Comrriissioners did indicate that certain areas of the hotel did not respect the existing development on adjacent properties and suggested that the applieant continue to explore F:\everyone\council\memos\99\wi1207 1 solutions to the problem. Of greatest concem was the height of the hotel in relation to the residential uses in the Gateway Buildirig and that the hotel turned its back on the Gateway Building. In this particular location the relative height of the hotel is approximately 68' tall. " Greenspace/Pedestrian Circulation This particular issue generated the most discussion. The Vail Village Inn Special Development District contemplates an interior courtyard partially surrounded by commercial development. The courtyard is intended to serve the guests and visitors staying within the Vail Village Inn as well as accommodate pedestrian traffic off of East Meadow Drive. The Commissioners are most concemed that the proposal does not provide adequate pedestrian circulation tlu-oughout the District. The applicant has been asked to review the site plans and seek opportunities to improve circulation. Possible improvements suggested by the Comrnissioners included reducing the size of the pool deck area, increasing the walkway widths near Phases I& II, introducing more retail frontage to the courtyard, creating a better pedestrian connection to the Gateway Building, raising the finish elevation of the pool deck, revising the towe,r design at the south entrance to the hotel and repairing the pavers within the District. Since the Commissioners last reviewed the site plans relative to pedestrian circulation the proposed site plan has been redesigned. The purpose of the redesign is to accommodate pedestrian circulation as requested. The Town of Vail Design Review Board has seen the redesigned plans and has passed along favorable comments to the applicant. Building Entrance on Vail Road The Comrriissioners generally believed that the proposed entrance design on Vail Road was acceptable. Several Commissioners clid request that the applicant present additional drawings and details of the proposed entrance design at the next meeting. Depending upon the information submitted, improvemenfs to the entrance maybe requested. The concern with the entrance is that it may lack a sense of arrival and that vehicles could not adequately maneuver within the designated area. Since the plans were last presented to the Commission the applicant has redesigned the area at the building's entrance off Vail Road. Staff is currently reviewing the plans to determine whether the Comrnission's concems were addressed. Accommodation Unit Requirement Over the years the Town has consistently required that accommodation units be provided in Pbase N of the Vail Village Inn. The required number was once as high as 175 units. The existing ordinance requires no fewer than 148 accommodation units. The applicant's proposal includes 99 accommodation units and 48 part-time fractional club units for a combined total of 147 units. The Comrnissioners believed that given the types of units proposed and the anticipated operation of the fractional fee club units, that the spirit and the intent of the requirement was essentially being met. Parking Requirernent The applicant is proposing to provide parking spaces within the new hotel. These spaces are in addition to the 42 hotel spaces that are already provided and will remain in the parking structure beneath the Phase III Condominium Building. Therefore, the total proposed parking spaces for the hotel is 290 parking spaces. The total number of parking spaces proposed for the entire Special Development District is 366. There is an existing requirement that 75 additional spaces be provided as part of the redevelopment of Phase N to meet an existing deficit within the District. Pursuant to the Zoning Regulations, 386 parking spaces are required of the hotel development. With the exception of the 75 required spaces, there is no change in the number of spaces provided for remainder of the Dsitrict. Generally, the Commission was favorable with the proposed parking plan. The Commission and staff did request that the applicant fmalize the pro;ram of the uses within the hotel so a more accurate parking requirement could be established. Staff anticipates discussing this matter in greater detail with the Commission and the applicant. Development Standards Deviations F:leveryonelcouncil\memos\99\wi 1207 2 The applicant is requesting to deviate from the prescribed development standards of the Public Accommodation Zone District. According to the Zoning Regulations, in part, deviations from the prescribed standards may be approved by the Town of Vail upon a finding by the Town Council that the negative impacts associated with said deviations are outweighed by the public benefit gained. In the case of the Vail Plaza Hotel, The requested deviations are, building height, setbacks and parking. The applicant is proposing an additiona125' of building height, up to 19- foot encroachments in to the required 20-foot setbacks and 20 fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Regulations. The exact number of parking spaces has not yet been determined as a final building program has not been provided for review. If deemed appropriate, the Council will need to make a finding to the affect that any negative impact associated with requested deviations is outweighed by the public benefit gained. Emplovee HousinQ The applicant is proposing to provide employee housing for a percentage of the "new" employees resulting from the hotel construction. Based upon an analysis completed by the applicant and provided to the Community Development Department, the new hotel is expected to generate 105 "new" employees. The "new" employees are in addition to the 74 employees already working full-time or part-time at the Vail Village Inn. The applicant is proposing to provide deed-restricted employee housing for 30% (32) of the "new" employees. Due to the unavailability of private vacant land resources within the Town limits, the applicant anticipates that all or a portion of the deed-restricted housing will be provided in an out-of-town or down-valley ]ocation. In order to maximize the benefit of the housing to the Town of Vail, the applicant has suggested that the housing will be available only to Vail Plaza Hotel employees. It is further anticipated that some form of transportation will be provided to the employees from the out-of-town or down-valley location to the hotel. The Planning & Environmental Cominission has briefly discussed the employee housing alternatives with the applicant and expressed that, based upon the information provided to date, the proposal seems reasonable and appropriata. Staff will be discussing the matters of employee housing with the applicant in greater detail. Staff and the Planning & Environmental Commission will be providing a final recommendation to the Town Council. Loading & Deliverv The loading and delivery alternatives have been discussed at length throughout the development review process by each of the parties involved. The Council has expressed concerns regarding aesthetics, capacity/adequacy and public safety. The Design Review Board has expressed concems that the loading and delivery facility must be incorporated into the design of the hotel and that it be aesthetically pleasing. The staff has reviewed the technical aspects of the design (slope, turning radii, access, etc.) and forward comments to the appiicant. The Planning & Environmental Commission has stated that the concept appears appropriate, however, the vehicle maneuvering/circulation and public safety concems must be addressed. The staff and the Commission have requested that the report of the consulting traffic engineers be amended to include analysis and recommendations on the circulation and public safety concerns. As greater information is provided and design alternatives are generated, further discussions will occur. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION, On Wednesday, December 1, 1999, the Town of Vail held a meeting to review and to make a preliminary recommendation on the Vail Plaza Hotel to the Vail Town Council. Based upon the review of the plans, including numerous conceptual review discussions, the Design Review Board of the Town of Vail has recommend approval of the hotel proposal. Please refer to the attached memo dated 12/1/99 for details. NEXT STEPS The next step in the development review process is a request for a final review and recommendation from the Planning & Environmental Cominission to the Vail Town Council. The fmal review and recommendation is scheduled for Monday, December 13. The applicant is then requesting another worksession with the Town Council F:\everyone\council\rriemos\99\wi1207 3 on December l4`h Staff anticipates that provided any unforeseen delays, the Council could be reviewing and considering an amending ordinance in early January of 2000. F:\everyone\council\memos\99\vvi1207 4 J ~ ~ r . , , ~ ; ~ _ . . : ~.~z.... r" I-70 Frontage Road , s , _ N' Gateway Building Vail Village Inn ~ I Building B ' L . i; Phase III . . . . . , 3 ~ . ~ . N~4 ` . ~ 7 f ~r ~ ~ ' ~ ? . , , Building A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a e J Vail Village I n ( 1°,• r ~~~~~~QQ ( hase I Phase Phase III a ~ ~s. \ ~ y a v' Circulation Legend ase A I C B : . ~External Pedestrian Vail Village Inn _ East Meadow Drive Phase V ~ . Internal ~ . - G . ; ' `?y Vehicular Z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel ? L roo5b„0~::~ES,Ia,NC[ Circulation Plan Vafl, Colorado IVot to Scale Scplember 27, 1999 , , , . , . 1 I h . . . ~ . . 1 ~ ~ . ` r . ` . . ' ~ . . . . ~ i l..o,~.~ . . . , ' ~ , . : ' ~ ' - ~r . , . . . , . - - _ , . ' ~ ' - , . \ . . . . - . . . .t . ~i" l . . _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ . - . _ . J. . . _ . ~A I ~ . ..+a . ~ . . ~ - u+.c ' , , ' ~ 'TR. ..-f^^i.. ~ • ~J . ~F.' ~ I , . . . , , ' , ~ , , . s - - , _ - ; . . 1 ` * ~ ~ . ~ . : • . r ~ ~ ~v .i . . . _ ~ . . ` ~ 'r'ir~-• r ~ i t ~ ~ pY.. €4 \ \ ~ ~ ~m ~'r 3~A!;.. sr . .~j ~C~ ~ / ~ ' ~ i q ,.i?' ' ~ ~ P y ~ ~ " ` ~ . , t ~ ' ~ I i ~ / \ / ~ , a " _ • . ~r~.t l'.. ~ . ' , ,~s ~Pe / ..F`~mc, ~ - . _ , ' . LL.: ~ ~~~'k,l F,~~ ~ ~ ~ Tp 41 . . . , " , . / . , . 1 'git N `;''r 01 . ` ' - ~c s~~ ~ ri l•, " . ~ zOE H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel Site Vignettes ~ ANo a~i6O~cewµg,'I~NC. vail, Colorado Key Plan November 23, 1999 A PLAZA PROMENADE ~ ~.w . • Access point into promenade area F,. • Handicap access to alI levels of promenade. LANDSCAPE NODE ~ . • Hardscape/Softscape nodes identify transition areas along promenade and mews. CE~Ii~IONIAI, S''AIR , s • Grand scale transition in promenade levels. f S Iert~~W Mb W~~ 1 i . ~4. HOTEL ENTRY • Guest and/or pedestrian Access to r -r- hotel & public spaces. x . . . , . _.._..,s."'._,.~..._-.~. OPIAZETTA • Garden plaza at pool for hotel Guests ~ ~ Z E H R E N AND cS50CIATES. INC. Vail Plaza Hotel Site vignettes L ( niiEV]akreE.IIAN~N'xG HTERIOPB • uhosG~ve ~ncHtr[ct~rtE ~ Vail, Colorado ~ November 23, 1999 PLAZA • Outdoor dining & Seating area • Major activity center ~ . TRANSITION SPACE • _ . > Mat erial, grade, changes signal change in space and scale. t' K t r t*•,~ r m,. ! s•~~. ( +~Y~, s3a;, S i~' , { y ,~`~,'fn Y p MEws 1~ IH~IJ ' ~ I'~ ~ ~ 1 • Garden paths create connections be- tween spaces. .~~-ti; ; ~ PORTAL • Architectural elements signal entries into changing spaces. ~ A, ~~fi PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS • Paving patterns identify pedestrian ~ connections between new & existing spaces. . ! ~YC ~ z E H R E N ~ ANDo~SSOC~IAiES. ' INC. vail Plaza Hotel Site Vignettes Vp~~e ncv~r ~ EGIURE u.~e.~.. Vail, Colorado ~ November 23, 1999 ~ Fu6~r~,l~la~mi 4~IIj~~il~~~~~.:~"~.. ; ~ i rl r' ,t i * 9 ,,a~ t~~4~ I7IMYr~hI~P ; ' k 5 , I l~gj`~~~~I~~ ; P V . I ~li. ~ ~ }r.. y ~3• 14 ~I r~ ~ f~ a ' ~I a..Y..,. I ~,~f Y~ r* t d4~ d ~ my~:~ ~R r Y Ilw N..~r ~j ~ 7 p. g ~ F. ~ 1 I . - , +t R . Wrt ~ h . . ~ . ~ . I I I I .CM4GFYMM, Z E 1-1 f's L N 7''~ [ ~1,t7AY?~L.~ r~'+~,~ Wrry[ / i'l e~v ~ . F~4~~.i. N J6~~4'r(]~ . ~~~~1. ~.1~,?~41..,(~, N'all, Co106'adtl 1.J~~ ~ ~st N°lc.~.. ~d+~~~ ~ F ~~~tr~r~ .r~c, f . .,J. Noa=enifaer2:.j, 1999 ~ _ , _ - . -=•T~ _~m._~._. _ ~...a. ~ ~ _ . ~I ~ iG , , . E ~ i • ~ ~ ti ~ ~ , . I . rxe ~ II I 9 ~ _ j , . ~ * ;s . , . _ . . - _ ~ , ~ I.I. ~EPE N ~ Vail P1 ;r2 qJ aza Hotel f . ~ . ,q. Perspective ~?Tiew ~ ~lail, Colorado Soutli Ea5t 1"laaa November 23, 1999 ~ i~ „ r` { ~ 4y s , ~ t . ,W #aXy'yl~l1 dy~l~p~,flo,ar sl~~i ~ ~ ~'M.~'~-~s4,~ ~ ~sw,~r~~^^y~ TM'1 a~5w~ jii a +n ' re , ~ . . . , _ . ~ y~~~y~ ~ s , • 1 ~ . .l a ~ ~ ' ; - - - . ' I r , - ' , , . , ~ , af.. . k. M . - i . " .w.. - r. r J I I . f tt! ~ ~ 4 ; I w N i ~ . ; . ~ , ~ a . ~ r ~ . , ~ : , _ ~ ; _ . . _ , „ . ~ . ~ ' . , , w . r.'~e~4i... ~ ~ E H R LN ~ E ~11 PldZa ~Utel EIevation Study i~ `Aw1w V`~il, CvEc~t-acf~ rr ~ t~ ~~,~:a~~~l Pv`c~v c.iTib~.r 23, 1999 N~ ~ ,i ~`~FA p~ ~ e y!~ ~s--- - - - m e m I 0 i Building B ~ ~ B i ~ 1771 ~ O ~ t O O I i \ ~ ZEHREN ~ p aH Maza Hote~ - ~ ~~~f Man AND ASSOC1ATB• I"C. Vail, Colorado "~4'' °010""00 "November 23, 1999 Scale: 1 " = 5014" m e~vswmn ~,uemMrim W'~ - - ~ _ 45-UL Dwelling E30 Utit 1 O Upper Level I 0 O 17dIC'6d' n4&lJ[.'0 0 b~[)L O-P-9 ~ O Building H ~ O~ O O ~ I o~ i az•ut, ~ ~ @ ~ O ~ ~ . ~ 0 ~ ~ - 1A ~ L ~ Z E H R E N Va0 0 F0~~a Hotc~~ ~ ~~vd Sox nND nssoanres, iNC. , Vail, Colorado r.aat ux eval. mLaOAm nNe ~M M~ November 23, 1999 Scale: 1"= 50'-0" 19 RAM't/ IN0711MIpi • ~ ~ ~ ~ .1 ~6•F 1 4S-L ~ L r - - 4L AF- ~ I I~ IBuildingB apy ~ I _ .l.owcqL~wet~ _ I ~ . r i L L w, •LL i o0 ' 9 - I I 1 ~ I I I I - I i O O I ~ 0 4{[7L S~UL 6{UL 7 \ - - - - ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 7L Va~ ~ Maza O ~ ~-il ~ ~ ~dl 0 ~ Il (~o~~ O U ~.(~N( ~ ~ 0 e nND wssaIArES, iHC. Vail, Colorado „M.,,o.,r,e,O. F°'M m1°fAOO Novembet 23, 1999 Scale: 1"= 50'-0" ie emwmn n~me~r~ao • o~ ~C~ - - - - ~ sr--- ~ 0 ~ o ~00 ---00 0 H6 ~ Hi ~ H2 H3 H4 40-F HS r ~ H7 Eito a o I HB H9 Q ~ I t Hi2 Building~Bxi3 i i I Hu ~ ~ ~~L I I I 's J I o H17 H19 a / I 27-UL 28.UL SrF ` ~ . ~ Mec .Mfaid \ -LL 1 •7P6' -0 , r-- i i - ~ O ~ q pF . ~ o _ I p~ ~ o - ~ ~ - , , ~ ~ 0 ~ m ~p 0 ~o_Ut, :i-tn. z{tn,~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Naza HoteQ Levc~ ~ ~(buu° Z E o--~ R E N ~~lo AND AssoaAres, iNC. Vail, Colorado scate: P=50'•0" N1Q~m ' RA4NN6''"'°m November 23 nnwx Im Awn, mwuoo nuo ,1999 TBIfT1Mfa1f) PUtO~ONSto~o U ~ 0 ~ o~ 00 0~ 0o H6 M1 H2 H3 W/ MS 31-F . 37 1 0 ~ ' H10 I H7 HA H9 ~ B H74 ~ oA Hl l HI ~ %Buil 6~ ~ H16 Ht a mo ~ oun o 0 a. FE. M.m e - - aos Boe ty ' O tg 0 om ~ 17 H1E M19 M20 H21 H22 H23 H2A O . O 0 - - - - ~ - - ~ HIS F1I6 14- ' ° IN ~ °La 10 ~ ~ 13-F 0 Lk=9 I ) ~ o !L EIlll REuV Haza'uote~ / ~evd ThUee AND ASSpC1ATE5, INC. Vdll, Colorado ~ XnW $CdlC: 1°= 50'-0° ~a.rm un nwH maaoonuo November 23, 1999 ~amn.ness~ FMS1aIMLia~a o 00 om 0° ° ~ H2 H3 H1 H5 L~ 16 ~ 1 ti-F ~ H9 I H6 I H7 HB Q H13 H1 BuildijB % , ~ M14 o N1 ~ 0 FI16 ~ I 00 o o a o a , = nv n,.ie qs L2 ' O °e 0 0~ ~o 10 0° i O i -H17 M1E 19 HI H2; M1] ~H2 9'F LS mO ~O o Fi24 H25 ~ bF ~ O - - - I I ~ Building A i ~ I M27 Hxa i ?ue ruo ~ AlTrrl& o gy O . ~ 31 H3 H93 14 35 Ff3 ~ ( I I 09 0090 0m L-- L------'J . ~ ~ , ~ , ~ Va0 0 Naza'Hotd i~ Leveo Two ZEHREN Vail, Colorado „ 5cale: 1 - 50'-0 AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AICHrrWTUa • KM~ • WrMM November 23,1999 lA1m! lffa AVON. Q%qR~00 Ni10 , 79QlOIfMmi) fA1tR1Uf1Y10O ~ ~ ~ -----------1_~- ~ ~ ~ w„ ~ i ' i I La6by 1 I ~ I oad'n p ~ Scrviee e I , ~ a0 O 00OooQ aOoa~ts0o 0 p i ~ (~a~su~~ ~ a1F9~^69¢p ~ o ~ ~ . . ~ O 00000 ~°~°~°p 0p O a ~ O °o Lobby ~ . 1 o s c~~0a0 ti ~ o adn~n m~ m0 ...p oon00.0 o°° ~ ° RW~ no~1 oo . 1 F Thrce Upu ~ o 0 ~ I 6 O ~otlpOp I~_... mo - - _ ~ aid 19 . - H~ HB 1 HIO IIII U / . Ove ~ ~ • § / 0 uilding A a xu 9 , Ni: s eB 14 H75 „ - 2 . ~ O F O P ~ ~ H16 Ht7 H18 H19 H20 H21 py ~O 6d I 0m 09 0~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ma7 a t ote~ ? L(d Omle 7L E R E I~ ~~1o AND nssocUTEs, iNC Vail, Colorado Scale: 1 50'-0" AMOMMR . WrMon P.QI~f tA1 AV011. QyOR/i00 lIttO November 23, 1999 rama«sms> rxe~aw?im 0 4 a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~0 0~ 0 0 0o0 S" 000 I - o ~-o ~-o~ ~ - , OpQOpo~ ~ a°o°o°a ° o o ° ( I _elo~oe ~ o ~OQOap~ O~o0°o~0 ~ ~ o ' - Y"by ad" „ ~ al...,. C=1 O ` gm. nmwneng 1 a „ ~ _ R@wi a,e o rvi / I ? ~----L- ~ Q _ Aeea111MO OQ N ~ ~ I ~ V•s ' ~ ~ `\J FaROlfloD L kotd ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Va° o ~ ~~aza ~ Lev~o Ze~°o nNO wssocIArES, iNC Vail, Colorado "'°"r'~° • • ~ 5cale: 1 50'-0" L ~m November 23, 1999 ia massmv rn~mows,m --~i------------------- ~i , M.,. I i c= j I I servka ' ~ 1 P'°' Conv~e _ _ ' _ - _ I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Tm~hn~rt I i~ ° ~r m• I i i ~O~ 0 p~ Mabia 1 ai m 1 C•3 CID CJ ~ i 1 V.I F-N F-I! F.16 F-17 F-II P49 P.70 Fdl C.1 ~ c-s ~ I L ' / , 4 ~ • ~ I c4 _ / " / I r v, 1 C" pwwng \ J ~ c•e I 1 r I v.s g ~ ` ' p_13 I V.1 FJI PJO R39 F•S! F.21 F-36 F35 F-S/ F31 F~S] ~ ~ Fu 1 ~ _ 'V! P-11 ~ I ~ V'' F~13 P-7] F-7a f-I! F.76 FJ7 i-7{ F-)9 P1D E.11 1 F.10 L , Iv-' S> II 1 F'9 NL r~:... ~ ~ F.e cto r-s w ea ra v- ~ i~ . 1 C.9 1 ~ \ ~ c-ii ~ Q \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ i' ) L ~ ~ Z E o-~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1~ ~ F0~171~1 Ho~C~~ U Level Knu§ One ^Na ^SSaUtU, iNC. Vail, Colorado A20CMN•. pj"No` . "'°"p" Scale: 1 50'-0" 'D'm mi0i"OD Navember 23, 1999 n efqwa~o ramaN.,m - - r - y V-104 V-1W V.73 V-73 V.39 V-38 V.1 ~ ~ Y-IUS V-102 V.11 V-71 V40 V-31 V•Z I V-I06 V-101 V-75 V-70 V.41 ~'-3fi V-3 ~ ~ V-107 V.100 V-76 Vfi9 Vd2 V-35 V4118 y.gq I i V-77 ~ V-fi8 ~ V-A3 ~ ~ ~ V-1119 V-96 V-~ V-67 V.44 ~ V.JI V-5 I ~ . V-I10 V-97 V-79 V-66 Vd5 V.33 V.R ~ ~ V.III V-96 V-BU V.65 V'46 I i V-111 V.93 V.PI V-61 V'47 Y-34 V-H V-IIJ V-94 V.B2 V-63 VJB V-7U VA I ~ V-1 14 V97 V-B7 V-(2 VJ9 ~ I V-29 V.IU ~ v.us v.sx v-a4 v-si v.sn v.le v- II V-116 V.91 V.85 V.60 V.SI V.27 V-12 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - J v.yo v-ae v.sv v.sz L--------------- I vae v.u I V-89 v-ev v.se v.53 1 y_]S V.1q I ~ ~ ~ - ' - - . ' - - - V.9R V421 V.IN V.115 V-24 V.IS I ~ _J JLJLJ ~ v.n v-ia l I rv4zo,r v-121,r v.izz, v-:z v_n I F-SS [26 IF-27 FF-39 F.I. FJI F-]1 F-J) ~;N J \1 ~ F-65 y.s~ y.51 V-21 V-~a F-10 F-11 F-ii ~F-23 ~F-24' 1 F-Ia F.61 v.56 1.55 1 V-]0 I I ~ ~ L ' ~ LF] -6) F-IB F F17 L F63 F ~R 1 F-09 F-IA Y-47 F•~6 F.IS F~1~ F-13 F-II FJI F-111 F-39 ~ F IS ` ~ i-I4 ~ ~V•11 f-50 FSI F-51 FS] FS~ F~55 F-56 F-57 F-5 F-59 FRU F-61 ~ 1 FI] ~ F.n ,u.l ~ \ c.2 I I \ \ ~1 1 F-II F~IO FA FS F-7 F•6 P.5 F-/ F-1 F-2 F-I C•1 1 ~ ~ ~ r-------------~ ~ Vao~ Fla'z~ ~ ~ o--~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ? Levd Mu na~s Two Ar,o nssocUTEs, ir,c. Vai1, Colorado Scale:l"=50'-0" AtaMCIMM '"""46""'H"°"' November23, 1999 r.o.~mc 10n nw~. cvvAoo neo , iaeM wsaur rAxemM?iao . ~ Da~ L~j ^Y ClLLb ~lam II~~' I A `FL-111. I Hotel ~ I - .Im 201 ~ r- . Hotel C ~mm 1 ~~Y ~ nvm - ~ ' I U . ~ ~IUm 1 1'-~1" a Retail •tum 6 -1' reeA ~~I Y Nm 16. 1 I ~tvm 1 ~mm I North Elevation East Elevation ED I n.~ s ~ i.l mmi~iI-o•~ ~1.en I~f,~ ~r~ m~~'f~:R" t~•~iouw ~ ~ ~ +U I~m~l~. ~1 ~ O~wm I53~~" West Elevation South Elevation . L ° ~ ~ u--o ~ ~ ~ ~~1~ ~ Naza HotC~~ „Bd:oo0dung A E~edaUons nNO AssoaArEs, iNC. Vail, Colorado scaie: 1^=50--0° ~-M~ mu)"Do•,w November 23,1999 ieemwsmn /KSTwflflv0 _'-•-'-'~~-ma„v vo::mm_t^ - ' Ctnfi CIu6 Chb CIu6 Lt1Ct] Club Club Hotel • -Q.n~Y ".Y 9~T6_' _ Club Ctub ~L~t`?~ Hotel Hwel b~ umllP3'r ~ Hotel Notel Hotcl Haml I . ~T63 x P' Frant Dcsk ~I P. hem Ratail Reuil mm . North Elevation East Elevation Cou rtyard Cou rtyard a•w~t~~.r - - - - - - - Clu6 ----~'y - . ~;•~,r . , . _ . Ctl ~ ~7 5~ Tr Club CIu 6 TH 127 Ctl Ha~e~ Club Club Club v~~.n Hatel Hotd ' - ~ ~ - Ctub Cluh ~ e7~.~~ . _ - ' _•__..6.w~~.ft~x'.~~~ ~ _ . ~O"~~ Hol<I Hotel Hotel Hatel -.L0 Aecounting Bar fmnlOlTiee P. Lobb B. i Lo6hy West Elevation South Elevation Courtyard Courtyard ~ ~ P~~17 ~l "otC~ ~ E~uREN Va° ~ Ba~uddoo~g A S c~~u~u~~ ~ AND 11550CIATES, iNC ` Vail, Colorado Scale:l"= 50'-0° MNNNO - I"TUMIO Vq{ November 23, 1999 ~.4~41 11H A QlO~App M~10 16 MqM?nuf rntO~olsnnoie - - - - - - - - - ~ - ~.-r~^~ _ M. ~-mani%a~v ALnelol l'II-T7'J'~ ~ Q~Ei ~61~Z~ . . - ~ u•rvni91`i"Y 4M nIRR^ - - - "~'P ~~taGt~~, U~ w fAl'7'rY rp~~ . n M1 iCi~6~Y North Elevation East Elevation Club - ~ - - Club Cluh Hutel - ~ ~ Hotel Hatel • m ~~P.s~- . Homl Hntd ~ _ Wading Area - - - - , .nn Retail Aetail ~ ~.a Ge~~ . . ._._._._._.,._._.--feZc West Elevation South Elevation L ° ZEHREN . Va0 0 Naza ~~W 4o Buoodo~~ B Uledatoons AND ASSOCiATES, iNC. Vail, Colorado Scale:l^=so-.o° I.OlOY Ifri A\'O!~ CYalUpp ~It» November 23, 1999 18 MOfI?C11/ 1MSMIKfIOb -s--If 11~1~ Club Club Club Cb Q] [t] Club I Club Hotel ~ Club ~ Homl °^^ai+.s v No10 Natel •'vp Ciub Hotel i1up o.'~ Hotel Hote~ Ciub Hotel Acalnumnt Loading . - . - . - . - . _ . _ . - . _ . _ . - . - . _ . _ Spe . Beilronm Spa 9reekoul ~ North Elevation East Elevation Cou rtyard Cou rtyard _ Mb - Club ••m Club Club Cluh Hotel Club Hotcl Q] ~ CIu6 Hotel CIu6 Hotel Hotet . °-e~~vi'a°~'•$ , -~t.-~9#$i~ Homl Ho[el Hatei Hotel Service Restnuram West Elevation South Elevation Cou rtyard Cou rtyard ~ , ~ ~ o-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1~ 0 Naza'riote~ i? Buu0dong B Secctoons AND nssocinrEs, iNC. Vail, Colorado s~le:r"=so--a~~ ~u~ ~ ~ 1M°~° P.O.W. Iflf A\d. November 23, 1999 OdOfA00 ~IltO ~ R Mql1lElSf FA[~~f~~.tOtl , i~~ii I 0 Gateway Bu(Iding Vail Plaza Hotel Building A Vail Village Inn Phase V Village Road Elevation e m ~ m e m m~ m~ m e m ° 0 8 a m o e?e Vail Village Inn Phese 111 Vail Plaza Hotel Building B Gateway Building North Frontage Road Elevation L ~ ~ Naza Hotd Street Sectuons Z E H R E ~~a nND nssociArEs, INC Vail, Colorado soaie: I"=so'-o" 1.0.WZ q~ wWl~ mlafAm ~w November 23, 1999 iaem"savr rAXmaw?im Ah~ f I ~ Club a 8 Hatei ? ? ' ~ ' L°bbr - Vail Piaza Hotel Vail Village Inn Building B Phase 111 ' Vail Plaza Hotel Building A South Plaza Elevation 0 r i Vail Vfllage Inn Vail Plaza Hotel Vail Plaza Hotel Phase V Bullding A 8uilding B East Plaza Elevatioh L Va*H ~ ~ e ~~1~L~1 ~i]Q~te~ ~~aza Sc~cc~uon§ ZEHREN Vail Colorado AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ Scale: 1"=50'-0" Novem6er 23, 1999 ~a emsncn~ FaomHS~m ~ _ ~a ~ ` ~ ' ~.u,u, _ m e ~ m \ ~ ('3rv.T1 I~ll) ~.Lli. ~ ~~1f0.51a f•llf, - ~ ~ ~ \ 1'ne!7 ~ f \ ~ ~.illi•1 Aft Building ~ p .~m ~ ~ ~ ' I•Hn•1 \ it ~ • ~ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ i ne,~n _ - _ AIR- - - - \ 1•~ ~.ifRl. \ Niu.51 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ .1•~]~.s) •l 16f~1 ~ ; - S _ \ _ ~ C \ F .l•iu1 ~ ~ - -~•~svl 1-11 1 } t• \ . 1 t~ t n 1 ls ` ` i(.~A~.T~ ~ ~ A \ \ •I~lui ~ ~S) ~ \ " - \L - 5 I•~t..fy ~.to ' - \ !•l JI - ' ~ '•,'t) - - ~ ~ " ~ ~ / •I~Inn fy ~ ~.31n.111 ~ 1•3uS. ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~(~i<~51 \ •1~ T~ i •(~IM) .I~~e~• •1_1 ~ywv~.~ r - ~ i4~5 O _l ~ _ 1•111'1 ~ _ f.~f1. O :A •f•~fr. ' ~ 1''1• ~ p ~ O 7.E ~iI I~ E N V ~l~ ~ Naza HOW U B11.00Od0Wg Hc~~ght Nal I ANO AssocinTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado Absolute Heighu "'°O"W"UIM • • lIff8110" Interpolated Contours P.o.eX 1+7wrt ~caauoo um November 23,1999 Scale; 1 $0'-0" ~ _i•~.r~ ` °~~b~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ t-~an S • r ~ ~ s A3h FE3] m ' \ R \ ~ ~~.1,]'1 1•3~1~ \ I+iH.ft ~ ~ \ \ 6 \ \ Hn \ \ ` ` - Building ` ~.ie]'1• ~ ~ ~ ~ •1'I)_=.1t _ _ - .I•~sl.f) ~ ~ I•~e11• _ _ _ - ~ / \ ('1 1~ 1 ~ _ N~Yt \ _ ~ (•~~f ~ .~.iflni I.TI •~~IF\ ~ G' ~ ~ _ ~ ~ -I.MbI \ \ •Iri~]i \ ` - ~ ~ _ . .n~mo .t«wy ~ ~ \ • , ~ S _ ~ ;f / .•1 !1 ~ ~ ~ OI~J~ _ ? 9051 `q\i , 1~ f _ _ ~•~e • \ .~.~er - _ ui.e~ .~d.e \ ws 1~ ~ . ~ .t• ..hie~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~.in. . c i 1 .e~1 - ~ +ru • ~ - ~ ~N~ ~ - • ~ _ w ~ ~ _ pxn•~ ~ _ ~ o Z E H R E N VaoD Naza'---'UOtd i~Buflodong --ueoga~t Nan 2 qprD AssocU?O, iNC. Vail, Colorado Maximum Height Above Crade "R4°'W' ~`°M . "'m November 23 1999 Interpolated Contours ra~ox roa nww~ m~aiuoo n.m ~ SCdlG: 1°= 50,_On mma~~ rw~emsw~oee' , - - IJ 17 Ul_1 Ffl 1 o,wm ir •-o. ' - • - - - F~ F ? D Aarnnul Ped ? ? Ue~wo S-J' ' lPotmti114~5 I i . F7 ' - ] o vnl ipu, i ' ? Pool Section B-B • : PmmnW BN^ ~ ? ~ D~ium I Pertnniel Dcd - ' ~ RPo~~nlill4p5 - _ Mlscmthu;Ml ~ ITemmyluNpsr,M~f A Level WA 'v'n~~~ iss~_o.. - P~1 J Com n lunio1eur, a3 - _ Mi~can~h .pl - OW ] Camm Jwi , as on pu Mi~cm~W:.pl , ~tum ' • - . - . - ' - ' - ' - ' - ~ I i,.n - • Pool Section GC ;T„-~B a~.Ats eenlal Bed ` sro~mau.,i D . IPiokCwdim Lilnc, d' Clumb, If PorrnoislBetl Dunun'1. - - . . Muumhw. - I TunmY 1 ~rer, pIS n~u~ ri+i ow ~ ~ m-i~7s / / Pool Section C-C C / - ~ Dcnun Ifi I IIOA lP~~~,~ •-~T • _ . . ~ . . Pool Section E-E Pool Section A-A ~ E H R E N ' VaH Ma7a HotCC ~ AND AssocuMs, iNC. Vail, Colorado ~ A%CWMMIN . ~.MG . MOAM I.O.q\ iffg AVM, ppqApp 2Il1p November 23, 1999 790101MW1ff lNO1IOSHtWn i i i i i i ~ ~ t 1 I - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - i -1 - - - - - - \ - - 7,.,., I- - - - - _ ~,,,,r„ - - - - - - - - 1 I - - I' ` ~ ,.1 . _ ` - - - - - - - - - - - d ~ Lobby .I ~ i i oaaio ~g 1 1 ~ ~ Service y .,n 1 I ~ ~ ",fi.,{ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~~~~I - "1 - ~ Reslaurant Lounge ~ ~ .a ~ m n~ _ . ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ Rcs~eurant Lobby ~ O I1~ ~ Reuil (jp P00~0~~po 1 [ ~ Three OPen d~Q (j a Qo 1 I H3 HI HS N6 ~ ~tt 0 C) C) 00~ n I Vai I Road South Frontage Road ~ . * Z E o-~ ~ ~ ~ va ~ ~ Naza Hote~ ',Wtu°eet Entov Studues AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Vail, Colorado Scale:l n_ 40'-0u Am+TenuRt . runw~c . uaana - rn.eoz nu ewµ caauoo etsm NOVembef 23, 1999 R N]O~Mf61S7 tAS11JqMLIE~O , , . . , , . ~ , , ~ , . _.~.r~. ~ ~ h=-..._ ~ - 1 - r „ - .s,--... . , _ . , ~ _ . , ~ • ~ . , ~ - - - _ - - ~ - - , • - ~ - - - . . . , _ , . ~ igl ~ _ - Y~.. E4'4. ~ ~ ~ S . g.wyi ^ . . '~Z 9 . ~.d... ~ ~ - ...,.rc~.. ION- HKIM~ Grading Plan 35' Straightbody/50'Articulated 19'-6" Sport Utility Vehicle . . . , . . . , . ~ - ~ - _ - . ~ - . . - - - - - - . . - - • - - - - t~~ - ' ' . - ' - ~ - ~ , . . . . , I r~pk~ d ~ x: i / ` 55' Semitrailer 45' Coach ~ 11 711 611 IIb ~ Z EN~H RuXEQ N ~ AND„ASSOc FATES„"o Vail Plaza Hotel Loading and Delivery Plan ~~•E~~~~~ ":E~~~~"E"~~E Vail,Colorado ~ w""'6""""~~.'~•~ November23,1999 I~I December 21 December 21 December 21 December 21 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Winter Solstice ~ ~ March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Spring/Fall Equinox ~ M ? o P December 21 December 21 )une 21 June 21 12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon Winter Solstice Surromer Solstice a Vo ~ ~ a-fl ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~ Naza----'ote~ Su~tt Std.odv nNO ASSOCIATES, iNC. Vail, Colorado Scale:t°=80'-0" A.°"M'"U' "`m°" November 23 no.eox Im ewr~ mauoo nao , 1999 iae~as~sain r.~ceras~sim r r ~ N N C- i O fOUf $CD ~ ` ~ _ •<P Vall Pian 0 Hae o w TwoStory Holiday ~ House o ! Street Sectian A ~ i~ 4 I Average Setback ' Three and Four Story Areas E C B A Three Seory r r` r Holbday House 6 ~ c~ o ~ Street Section B z I ¢ ~s~• ~ z w x I W a N ~ Four Story Three Sbory I Haliday I Fiovse Yail P!a¢¦ CT~ j f HoteI ~ N ~ Average Setback i I C;n Three and Four Stery Areas Street Section C N ~ r/aDQ Ma71a Hot(~ SetlbacOc Stu~9 ~ Z Ca-OR E t~ ~ ~l C7 AND JS30CU18, INC. Vail, ColOradO Scale: i' = 40'4r I Novert*ef y3, 1949 ~ob IE~ MAM1 ~4~00 ~Ir , I iawr~ nswri~ \ 11 ~y _ TOWN OF YAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479=2138 FAX 970-479-2452 O Q ~ MEMORANDUM ~ ~ To: Town of Vail Design Review Board From: Community Development Department Date: December 1, 1999 Re: Vail Plaza Hotel -Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council In anticipation of appearing before the Vail Town Council for first reading of an amending ordinance to allow for the redevelopment of Phase N of the Vail Village Inn Special Development District, the applicant has requested a preliminary recommendation from the Design Review Board. Pursuant to the Town Code, in part, "no person shall building construction or demolition within the corporate limits of the Town unless design approval has been granted in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code." Should the Design Review Board choose to make a preliminary recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council on the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, staff would suggest that the following finding and- conditions be made part of the recommendation: "Upon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the Board finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structures, the hotel's surroundings and with Vail's environment. The Board further finds that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of tlie Design Guidelines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plan & Urban Design Considerations. Therefore, the Board recommends approval of the redevelopmenT proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. The Board's recommendation of approval carries with it the following conditions: , l. That the applicant submits a final landscape plan, final off-site improvements plan, and outdoor ligllting plan in accordance with the provisions prescribed in the Zoning Regulations for review and approval of the Design Review Board. 2. That the applicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and approval of the Design Review Board. 3. That the applicant submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. 4. That the applicant submits a roof-top mechanical plan prior to the issuance of a building perrnit. All roof- top mechanical equipment shall be enclosed and screened from public view. RECYCLEDPAPER : ~ . DEC-O1-99 02:36PM FROM-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.07/14 F-582 JOINT R.ESOLUTION ADOPTEp 8Y THE BOARD OF AIRECTORS ANA MENiBERS OF THE POTA1'O p.4TCH CLYJB CONDONxiNIiA1Z ASSOCIATION, YNC. VI~IHEREAS, the Poiato Patch Club Condominium Associatio,q, Inc, (herei~er refeired ta as the "Associarian") is currenily a party to certain liugauon initiated by John A. Carnie aud Joan T. Camic (the "Camies"} requesting the condeaznauon af a certain easement over propeny owned by the Associatian in order to obtain access to a landlocked parcel of land located adjaceut to Association property and currently Qwned by ihe Carnies (ihe "Carnie Propert}'')- WHEREAS, the Association has been advised that the Carnies may desire to sell theii' property to MJL Develapment Inc. and/or Michael J. Lauterbach sud/or deir assigqs or affiliazcs (hereineer collectively referred to $s the "Poteniial Purchaser'i. WHEREAS, iniual disCUSSions have taken place between suthQrized representttiives of the Association and the Potential Purchaser conceming the purchase of the Camie Properry and the possible grant of an access easement ovcr Assoriation property by the Association w Potential Ptmhaser. WUEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Association have reached agenerai understanding with Potential Ptxrchaser regarding the process by which Poieutia2 Purchaser could obtain au $ccess easement &orn the Association at an agreed upon lacation if Potential Purch$ser actually obtains title to the Carnie Propetry. WIWJZEAS, if Poteniia,l Purchaser obtains $pproval of the Town of Vail (and ail ather governmental endties with jurisdiction over the subject properiy) for Potential Purchaser's development plans and specifications (the "Plans and Specificadons') with respect to the Carnie Property, the prospecis of a traasfer of title to the Camie property to the Potentiai Purchascr are greatlY increased. WH&REAS, in order to obtaiu approvei of the Plans and Specifxcations for ihe deveIopmeni of The Catnie Property, PoYential Purchaser ]as advised the Associatiou that Potential Purchaser requires a letter of iutent finm the Associ$tion agreei.ng to grani to PotentW Purchaser an easement for inWess and egress over Associatian properry to the Carnie Property at the locarion specifxed in the plans and Specifications. WHHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser is able to acquire the Camie Property and obtain from the Associatiaxt the easement for ingtess and egress rnore panicu,lar3y described hereim, the liugation filed by the Camies with respect thereto could be disuiissed and the Association cauld be released from the obligation to defead such artion. WHM~EAS, on June 4, 1999 the Board of Directors of the Associ$tion adopted $ resolution (by a vote of six to two) recommending thai the $oazd of Directois bring io the owners and members of the Association at the siuusai meeting, a nesoliuion authori2iug the Association to pttrsue the maiters more particularly described herein. ?17441 RGALT 17nA9xRrD1 DE£-01-99 02:36PM FROIA-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.08/14 F-582 NOW THERUORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FQLLOWS, in accordance with SecQpn 1$.3.4 of the Candomuuum Dec3aration far Potato Patch Condorniniuns: I_ T'hr Board of Directors of the Assaciation is hereby auThorized ro grant an easemenT for ingres3 and sgr+cess to Potential PuiChaser upon satisf4tioa of all of the teims and conditians therefar set fasth in this Resolution. 2. The g~sut of the subjcct e:asement for ingress and egress {rhe "Easement'l sha11 be subject to the saxisfacdon of each and every one of the fotiowing conditions by Potential Purchasez: - (a) Acquisition. of it,e Carnie Property by Potentiai Purcbager; (b) Final plat approvai by the Town of Vail of the Plans ;nd Specific$tious for developrnent of the C amie Property (the "pevelopment"); (c) The Development shall coAtain no more than fxvc (5) singie faraily residcums and shall noi exceed i,500 square feet GIZFA, developetl and built in accardanGe with the site plau attaehed hereto; (d) A 30 foot setback fxvm the Association's east property ]ine shall be established in the Plans and Specifications and xnainxained by Potentisl Purchaser; (e) The Easenent ahalt nai be rnore than 25 fea in width, snd the tuming radius of the Easement within, the AssaciaAaa pzopeity must be approved by the Town of Vail Fire Aepartrnent and the Association Boazd of Uirecton; (t) The written evidertce of the Easement must provide $11 Costs of surveying, cnntpiying with Towri of Vail plazuaing requirements, aIl consuuction (ineludiag roed consiructiom), ]andscaping and xounaing of the eutrance, as wel! as the resta=auan of any Associatipnn, propercy wtich is altered oz da,maged duting coastxuetion, shali be bome solely by Potsutial Purchaser; (9) Pot=tial PurchasPx shail, upon acecution af the forma1 docutncntatian of the Eesement~ pay to the Association the stM of $250,000, whic.h sW1 be aUacaied by thf; Associarirnt a.s condemnation award damnges as specified in SeciioA 33.4 of the Candaminitun Declaration for Potato Pateh Club Coadomuiiums; (h) The written documentasion of the FAsement shaII contain, ax couuide wiih othet documentation exrcuted by the Assaciatidn and Poteutia]. Puzchaser, a full settle.nent of the Caraie litigation w1th prejudice; (i) The Easement shau not be gramed unw such time as Potenual Pnrchaser has obtaiaed fee titie to the Camie ProPertY; (i} t7pan issuauee of aud in corijuncdon vr?lth the executian of a Zetter Qf intent to grsnt the- Fasemern to Potemial Purchaser by the A.ssociation, the Carnies mvst agree and stipulate ca a reasonabte comtinuanse and vacation of ihe Uial dale and a174V6 1 =wTS 0&MftZI7PM 2 DEE-01-99 02:36PM FROV-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.09/14 F-582 abatement af all legat proceediAgs in the ctuzent coademnation litigatian, pending completion of the TowA af Vail planning ptncess with resptct to the PIam and Specificauons af Potential Ptrchaser for Thc Lk-velopment. FURTfIER RE SOLVED, thax the ,Board of Directois of the Associatio» is hereby authorizxd to issue a non-binding letter of inieni w the Poteniial Purcbaser specifying the parameroers and limitations with respect to the Ea.semsnt seL fonh above and any othesc limitatioas andJrnc conditions reyuired by the Board of Directors ar counsel tor the Assaciation for the ga5sible grant of the Easement uo Fotential Purehaser. Such letter of inteat must contain aa a,cknowledgment by the Potentiai puxchaszr ibat zhe issuance of the !ever af intent and the execution of the Easement shaU iu no way bc coasmued tp bs an approval by the Association (or auy of its mcrabm) of the Devclopment orthe Ptans and Specifications, and that ati rnernbers of the Associatian and tlic Associatian itself reserve ali righxs to parcicipale in any Town of VaiL plannia~ process rclating to the develapment a(' the Camie Prcpert.y_ Potemia] Pwxchaser must funher acknowledoe tbat eertain mearbers of the Assoeiatioa may be appased to the grant of the Ea,,errtant and may actively parpcipate in such Town of Vai1 plauniug pmccss. FURTHFR RF,$QLVED, rbat within =he iimitaUons arai parame= set foxth above, rhe Board of Dim-ctox's of the Associatian shall be and is hereby authorized, empovvemd and direeted to nebotiaie, executz and, as necessary, record the abflve-describcd lemr of intent and the fma1 definitive written Fasement in conjuncti4n with couasel for the Associatian, and to ncgotiau a fusal sefflement of the CazAey litigation, KIlth prej udir,e, as of the result of the grant af . the Easemcnt. FU-2.THF,R RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors is and shaU 6e authorizcd, cmpowercd aad duected ta explore the possibility aC ereating a sub-asavciation with respect to the fuW spproved development of the Caruic Propmy fQr rhe gurpases of_ (a) sharug, the cost of maimenance, mpairs and sAaw retnoval far the Eascment; (b) $ceess tp and appmpriate cost sharing in Ehe m«intertance, mpair and capital improvecnanis to the eommnn elements ol' the Association, includixtg the unnis courts, ppol, spa and healih cluh; and (c) to amend the Condomi.rzium. Utc[acation fdr Potato Pa.tch Club Condoraiaiums to include the above-descriE,ed p:nvfsians, subjecx to the approval of The • owners and morcgagees of units with;.a the Association as rcquusd by such Mal=tion, with such aiheY tcrnns and conditians contained thercin as may be required by the Board of Dircctors and r„auusc-I for the Associatian as appropriate_ ~{74Y0.! RCwiT us3-zP =19ym 3 DEE-01-99 02:37PM FRON-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.10/14 F-582 "rhe undersigned, as President of ihe Association, herehy cerrifies rha the Resalutions conrained herein were duly adopted and approved by the Board af Direcr,ors and the members of the Association at the aanusl meeting of the Association conducted on July 2, 1999 aud the subsequent Board of Directors meeting bcld im.mediat.ely therea,ftor. 2~~ CN/ QVJII~- TJ. Gargarl, .D., si of the Associatiari Appmved and accepted this ~ day of s~3 3 zchael J_ Lauterbach 417499 1 194nI I awuM s:s, ne 4 DEE-01-99 02:37PM fROM-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.11/14 F-582 Dur4m, ABPLANAL? omicm & MAl1R1ELLO, P.C. . MmEqoa" 40"n IL sym Warspw smK lWf4Anra . aow 9ours P T~wour ~ a.~e I.n,~+~ a~0 . ~ aa~o w~ cnai 47veLsoa comm WAaoM WML Sw« aoo +%m.a,c a py~ Cd.oN~ si~7 ~707 A78-4~SS .aCn~1'IVa.MWS" x'.~.~*~~~.~gWw~ ~ 1999 T.iAiw ft Outm, CLai, .~aNiQ ~ ~4~Q34'~k 3fti Rmowu ran= lb. DOosidc Uaudcft x--Um~ ~J+ D~e~t zlt sawhFmnrwRcad wac %dco $l+fi59 'UK Cnkiatuftch IfiOjrxt • Pomm Pmk cm* . ~ ~ a~tt Dav~ . . a~ad Mt~yansmaww% aWFkt4Im b=sngqged ti•~-~me I~ ~~pt~ r•heavAas a~~es II =d 26, pO4n,c, pafth qni~, - ~ ia avsoa~a~ l~Ii • by t~e Td~a~a a~E vaft of ~ p~p~ • deve~op~eqr aF t~e ~d lQac= ta asd eraa af their sopwde& Tbas hmd is au =Pbaed P'ncd+aWVAd by W. aad 16s. Cm=r- 7U dcvdgpa Is ~ Laac~:b~1. ~e Bo~d ~ap~e i~r 1~~ ~'~g~p P'~ Ctexic'0 L... 1'lsis ktter is 3amended Ia folkarup M rna =Wgw 0i *0 =ammjalMbmg=dta *e TaM by W lAUmdw* 9ad oa ar~r ~ a~ d~a L'~# n~'pug~ We bm~ed a~ ~~s o~ e~3n~e ca t~ fiaVM aad 3c seeats" Oputan d=th=cbe darMMarcu=ecmmd, -ghcpw*bb=an= ~ tve fonotiv.i~qg- 3. Tm Z'om bad baat pmviW wft a =ohm= adopW 1y *e 8owd af t3o ~~3 t~ ~7, ~ppa~y'imomdedto~y fur a 340r af MMat =dew wbi& m a=W2 caad be oi~das+3. W!s!+ naram~ ~ ~ ~'ces~) . ~ ~R ffi~ ~ by 1he P'~ sa ~ ~ ~ IMP ~ af Ss~ I8~3 oi ~d;c~c g~ p~ P~me~CnbL ltjs tbe8*md'spae~tha the ~ ~ dfnvo-thirds {~9~ ~~hs vw~ iaP~+Ca~ ~roY~d~ ~ • . DEC-01-99 02:37PM FROVI-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.12/14 F-582 . a?~ dw aemed Sm jmietambLed =mg%ft) frA ardw cbat da 8arm+d mw b+o waochad ia ~ y,o awan=L sme maub.rs aFfft J1a~oaa~~s 44qpmsvmaumpo~ aod botod we co~nvin~ed tba ft =noun= aw be g=md c* oroc;gh = mueodmr~ ~*11 de+eosauta'm Md by o~ _ tbO msm= by 29 oMMM ca& of VhM UU 84 mddded I=wm iu OU PmpeM., ku My ewI i, a *t #lm,e of the kst rI* otr to *e gPC Rmrd of Dfte=M =ly n of *e 29 owner =msm*wf=edl?abavebOebe=abWvx4 =dno I~~ cam-am"d- oa thc prapoaL "hcn*m *9 sumbnlm can= be pm*A b. Ua seaot4ti+aet IM Wt iaUndAd aad. did as seM rit a 1acee of ~ ~~~~M PCOVM* m PW 3j dla raoluam a~o~d *e 8aard of ="oon tio 3a" ik iooe offtm up= &e sagafiadw of *e oxmwm sa ftw* JIL *s zemotaun Invu (gaa'esD9 ca Me 2) mt sttch a&ar waftow n mW ba hmpa@Wb9sbe8md+~~ Abowotftmthmnotbam- 'sst~+ed, ~ t'~ ~ ~ ~t~, ~Bed. be~t~ss ibe - Soahd ba~ not ' ~tat'~rr ~qe~ ~l be~ siadha~s~e~~ aaaeb~alcnrnm aad Umdm irivtmt Ukdkowd dica approvd of*e Propawd Er= afamess. c. To rise eftm *a iWe:e bw bm aW dlsewdm rvl bme in *e owm= ar *e do4elnW md the aand of ubusm of PM *M hu =ft dqth wft *e pmoDge mm of a 25*m WUkcmmmmk Z'beTam3=brdhcmdtbWidd~&50-&mvdde awa 404Oatwida =mwe=xMbe *asthe amm =at is nabe counmedin*e assomaw. ~ndshvt~~~oe~t+~ E3~ e~~ be mal;&d #n Provo* i9~b+K d~eP pawns nmm. Tw Aond bsu ~ elnh imt am dbcmsed mw of dwe P~ ~m ab~ Rwh of dose ~eq~ IN I IN dat* , s Vdxo tpa vdkSC is nor a y-fva~ dI"Way _ an~atd ~ CaVecdviYr if . ad tbe Sgudwm ddV O! tim V=Bk o~tac euEtpomed ia ordw zc Pmdfttbe s~e roqub"hwthe mam~.~. Na~qe o~ ~~se hmMM hmLomcmddcrcd bytbePpCH~d o!Dboumm md . " ,be nokuga cnma Le coaddeoM evldmxe of ftm u tv my . ~ •~„r . DEC-01-99 01:38PM FRON-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.13/14 F-582 d. saeuAA " of *e -Iftakdm pm"W"_tv *6 Tam af Vw Pe~avld-x dm my pM29ft ai fficUmomb9On Ann odaR= _ 3scnad~OOedupm1leapprovdbyft asr+odadoaaftbm~ tmfts prapwea. *e miftc sm 9 m whI& b d~ ~ ~te plamtbrmam*e tmai~ Istsapt mumosabopl's asd fx Is vafty *at ic woWd be appmvd bq *e A~sodatio~. C- rg~vffly s+a¢h a~ c.t~mut be psmuol*d. , 2. ne plstu . M. Tle mvs pmv3ded,m deTavva9t=msimtwe is ndiaoa=oS ~btolw~'~n~chea~~mestiabeAO-f~~ ~b~+e~snos~b `ag visbc-Opww.? Iatim tbm tx aosiWt-a4Wq at 23i. Aa *eportlftaf*elKamdwWm=w~aeAc~mpamkstbia l0M ftft=96ibe1md abi&is m be dkmd by oiqsem= ~y ~1 CO~~ ow~Rr. lbe NC Jla~vdati~oa ~ ~p pmrt . ol*2 bndwhfCb3s p~+e~oe~d wbe as, Find by*e =mtemt xn *e opWem ofa ntsmbercfavrnmars, *e AwodWtlam cpn Xm=n*- rwe fia Ind leh it do= owri. In asy GVCC4 *0 ma~ ~d sotbeTawa mim amwfhid@udbftaa*WwdxwzW* aemW mUkb don not exUt. b. T~re n~s pR+~ ~a tbe Tvw~ aa~ea edC baweiaPPC Uzfta 1 lwd2%mdaaaoa at a3t esfwawdww cCitbe ~ Oftwoposed newiawL Ia fWcr.*ia wa hu at Ieatsbt==aae pine mves „ altolabM bsoe beap»oecwd by ft PPC ownrs =d rvoald ba eftmls~ ac, d ol *e lmd ' dri P 1, mw, kMad. if Y sond 9vm pem3md ftov* tbe PVC - p+aMty ai tds paim We w7E law pim~s of these t~ a- al" bo you sboitly adr tlo leme~ b um=i-md w ym 9 tbW do an aceampmwiL ' e. 84eet C.-1 afte Alm submitmd as fte 4t3t of Aqpst weemt ta klmmW am*xIm ia wha isl iu bm aa hoobdft pmbkaai. 1he p, vpuw 3a qmesdoa fs aa ad*= m fte saI ke. AbbouA an aacoqrt bas bms mwd+e m dutm a Sm t:ack~ am u tbe ~ +aEtbe a~r soa~ ~p~redsabsIan 3s dm1le '!'bap~apo~d d~a~ ~ ~a~eaask~ ~ sbi~~s aas a~aLae~a~~+e c~ ~ a~ a~t~bepa~ed ~af~Ot aF dw SaMp of Uart No. 46 arakm im iavvIAM tm ibe pam;ggs of 3 ~ .DEC-01-99 02:38PM FR0M-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.14/14 F-582 • vdter mw'BuztiYvabwjM mdaaomud ivom for umwiu ac&jb ~eat3a~. uww Swdt dhumsrmm, a 5=e emagenry Moaod ~aosotayth~s~es3d~a~sa~tt3~a ~ ba~ oits cszsd~ ~s w~e~. d~ mt . appm to be =e Arbi& iX p"= Ca rCW*SfiM 3. The owaarft Isom a. ne TMs W aLwctrpr~~ idend&d nmw af *a i~ aad . z~0 mmam=r~aarid to the P"deex. I1aANeM . ~ t~ose ae above wb"vertamwt tD *e Camfe pope:qr, but 'po rbe PpC popa*, A=mdbiffiya ic slodd be mqpfted *a *t PgC p~is pm md pa~3 af dee pmgaoL md the .pmpo=, as aTag& siwd,d aoe mwe £eam vubm *e appffara aE eh,e owwoof *a nt e~t~e -dffccud i.e. tht awn= agt~ romeno commmejgmmu af*a ~ b- In 90qdft *t Waeas af t~ ~of ft Mr, tt mbodd b+t bb= insftd ~dm zbeOWW oftbe $=aii is aa~ ~~PC but t~e a~r af e~h oo~a~ ~1t. 7hmoma~ataderem=~rdaw0dtode • _ bw tiio~e 3d=a8,~d abooe sbo~d be ~d~l ~es !or tbe Tawn at ~ 3WP Of *8 P'rDcmbogs- 12 vy m W mftble m Aimm wi* yrou a4p bam af the ~oexba~hpsopmalT*khym~w lmdwdhftadau incin b„c noc I#R*sd mo dwe Raed ab"& Tb=ic yOt for yoW =adned asds'wm la tus MoptW. v~ ~ actbw 1!. Abp~i x~ Aam,t ~'av+esno~t ind bim c,evW ~d 4 . MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: December 7, 1999 SUBJECT: An appeal of the Design Review Board's approval of a proposed 5 dwelling unit development plan, located to the east of the Potato Patch Club and north of Sun Vail on an unplatted parcel.. 'Appellants: Dome Investment Group and George and Elizabeth Ireland, represented by Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr.. Planner: Dominic Mauriello . - I. SUBJECT PROPERTY The "Carnie Property,~ ~a npld ropose ld development is tited `tPotato Patch Cr ek.orth of Sun Vail (see attache p) The P II. STANDING OF APPELLANT The Appellants are individual owners of Unit 11 (Dome Investment Group) and Unit 15 (Ireland) in the Potato Patch Club. The Potato Fatch Club is located adjacent to the proposed development just to the west. This appeal was filed by individual unit owners and is not on behalf of the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association. The Association is in general approval of the approved plan. III. BACKGROUND List of attachments: - Exhibit #1- Appellant's appeal form - Exhibit #2 - Reductions of approved plans - Exhibit #3 - Notice to adjacent property owners and location map - Exhibit #4 - Potato Patch Club Resolution The Development Proposal The following is a summary of the background on this proposal and appeal. The applicant, Jack Carnie, represented by Michael Lauterbach (Mr. Lauterbach has the property under contract to purchase), filed an application for a Minor Subdivision with the Community Development Department on July 12, 1999. After reviewing the items submitted, the Community Development Department (hereafter "staff") informed the applicant that he had filed the wrong application for the development approval intended. Since the property is zone RC, the applicant will be developing the project as a Town House plat. This requires an approval of a development plan 1 before the pfatting process can take place. The applicant then submitted a Design Review _ Application on August 24, 1999. , The application submitted was for the development of 5 single family homes on a 59,500 sq. ft. parcel of land (Potato Patch Creek) zoned Residential Cluster (RC). Residential Cluster zoning allows the development of single-family, two-family and multiple-family dwelling units. The allowable number of dwelling units on the property is 7.5 dwelling units based on a density of 6 dwelling units per acre. ' The project is accessed, through the Potato Patch.Club along an existing driveway. It was identified that this driveway, due to the increase in use by'the Potato Patch Creek proposal, would have to be upgraded (widened in certain areas) to allow access to the proposed project. The applicant's submittal included a resolution from the Board of Directors of the Potato Patch Condominium Association (see exhibit) indicating their intent to approve this access and related improvements. " A notice was mailed to adjacent property owners on July 29, 1999 (see exhibit). This was a Board courtesy notice and is not required b aiae I On Oc~to~berO6t be 20the 19991t~he Des'gn Review reviewed the proposal as a concep Board approved the development proposal subject to four conditions: 1. Prior to the recording of any pla ao access rthrough the Potato Pat h Cluybthe owner/applicant shall secure eg property via an access easement or'similar instrument. 2. Prior to the recording of any plat or construction on the Carnie property,., the owner/applicant shall obtain written approval from the Potato Patch Club . Homeowner's Association for completing driveway/access improvements (i.e., paving and grading) on the Potato Patch C4ub praperty. 3. Final civil engineering plans must be approved by the Town Engineer for the access road prior to application for a building permit. 4. The approval is specific to the Carnie property and does not extend to property outside the subject parcel. On November 10, 1999, the Community Development Department received a Design Review Application from the Potato Patch C1ub Condominium Association, 1nc. to construct the access improvements discussed above. No approval has been issued for the access improvements as additional information is needed to approve the application. IV. NATURE OF THE APPEAL The specific language of the appeal is attached and should be relied upon as the statement of the appeal. The following is a summary of issues prepared by Town staff: 1. The approval of the development plan constitutes a public safety hazard - endangering the properry of the Appellants. . 2, The approval allows development without adequate review and consideration of the impacts on the Appellants and the Potato Patch Club in generaf. 2 is 3. The approval pand aen of the Appetlanots oh the Potato Patch Club. without the consen pproval 4. The plans upon which the Design Review Board used to make its approval are inaccurate and incomplete. V. TOWN RESPONSE TO THE APPEAL The Community Development Department has prepared the following analysis in an attempt to answer the appeal. The applicant provided complete and adequate plans for reviewing the proposal. While the application did not include an absolute approval from the Potato Patch Club it did include a resolution stating the Association's intent to provide an easement across the Potato Patch Club property. Since this resolution did not actually grant an easement, the DRB placed two very specific conditions requiring that an easement be obtained from the Association and that any improvements to the-Association's land be approved by the Association. Therefore, if no approval is given and no easement is obtained, the approval becomes void. Since the date of the Potato Patch Creek development plan approval, the Town has received an application to complete the required improvements to the access on the Association's property (paving to widen driveway). This application is signed by the President of the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association. This application is currently being analyzed by the Town staff to insure that it meets all of the applicable development regulations. Therefore, the issue of whether the applicant has the right to access the property appears to be adequately protected. All of the improvements required on the Potato Patcii Club property are the result of the Town's analysis to insure that the access meets the minimum requirements for vehicular access as provided in the Town's regulations. These improvements will insure the safe access of all parties involved. The plans provided also adequately address the access to utilities for the proposed development. VI. REQUIRED ACTION Uphold/Overturn/Modify the Design Review Board's approval with conditions of the proposed development plan for Potato Patch Creek. The Town Council is required to make findings of fact in accordance with the Town of Vail Municipal Code: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (Zoning Regulations, Title 12) have or have noi been met. VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION . 3 Staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the Design Review Board's approval with conditions of the proposed development plan for Potato Patch Creek subject to the following findings: 1. That the standards and condiein memposed by the requirements of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations) have be 2. That the conditions imposed on the approval are anum Associat otn.e interest of the Appellants and the Potato Patch Club Condom , 4 , ~XVIlYJI{~ ~ l *VA ~aWvAPPEALS FORM REQUIRED FOR FILING AN APPEAL OF A STAFF, DESIGN REVIEW BOAR.D OR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION A. ACTION/DECISION BEING APPEALED: Approval of a proj ect known as the Lauterbach/Carnie Pro'ect, also known as the Carnie/Lauterbach Project and as Potato Patch Club, by the Town of Vail Design Review Board on the 20th of October, 1999. B. DATEOFACTION/DECISION: 20 netnher 1999 C. NAME OF BOARD OR PERSON RENDERING THE DECISION/TAKING ACTION: Town of Vail Design Review Board D. NAME OF APPELLANT(S): Dome Investment Group George & Elisabeth Ireland c/o Pau1 Hoff Suite 3650 3800 East Long Road 1700.Lincoln Street MAILING ADDRESS: T~i ttl Ptnn CO 801 1-1 91 4 Dpn~TPr O 80203 Unit 11 Unit 15 Potato Patch Club Condos Potato Patch C1ub Condos PHYSICAL ADDRESS IN VAIL: 950 Red Sandstone Rd, Vail M@NB950RedSandstoneRdVai Telephone: (303)689-9800 (303)830-2171 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF APPELLANT'S PROPERTY IN VAIL: TTn i t 1 5 pnta+-n pa t,•h r-l u1-, . Unit 11, Potato Patch Condominiums xa',4~ a..~.c4 E. SIGNATURE(S). :t Fage 1 of 2 t , F', nr lll~ SU8& 3'lu;iiali:` Ri1A ' Vali; 00 t4~.i.i! F. Does this appeal invo(ve a specific parcel of land? Ye s If yes, please provide the following information: are you an adjacent properiy owner? Yes X no . If no, give a detailed explanaaon of how you are an "aggrieved or adversely affected person." "Aggrieved or adversely affected person" means any person who will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or furthered by this tide. The alleged adverse intezest may be shared in common with other members of the community at lazge, but shall exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons. Appellants are the owners of specific condominiums and the owners . of unaivided.interests in the general common elements of the - Potato Patch Club, which adjoins the property which was the subject of the action from which this appeal is being taken. The approval of the project, 4nd its possible development, constitute a public safety hazard endangering the property of the Appellants and would " permit the development of the subject property without adequate' review and consideration of the impacts on the property of the Appellants and the Potato Patch Club in general. The approval would also permit the development based upon access through the Potato Patch Club for which no standards have been established artlregardirig which there has been neither consent by the appellants oi the other owners of Potato Patch Club nor any analysis or review of the impact.of chanres to the Potato Patch Club in association with that access. Further, the plans upon which the Design Review Boarcl relied, in association with conditioningapproval upon access through..the, Potato Patch Club are inaccurate, incomplete and unable to accurately understand the impact of the proposed project or the condition imposed upon the property of the Appellants and the Potato Patch Club as a whole. G. Provide the names and addresses (both person's mailing address and property's physical address in Vail) of all owners of property which are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including properties . separated by a xight-of-way, stream, or other intervening barriers). Also provide addr`essed and stamped envelopes for each property owner on the list. H. On separate sheets of paper, specify the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code sections having relevance to the action being appealed I. FEE: $0.00 Page 2 of 2 - . . , . . . - . . . . ~ , LAW OFFICES - DUNN, ABPLANALP & MAURIELLO, P.C. A PqOfESS10NAL CORPORATtON JOHN W. DUNN WESTSTAR BANK BUILDING TELEPHONE: ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP,-JR. 108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST (970)476-0300 DIANE HERMAN MAURIELLO FACSIMICE: CARRIE HENDON O'NEIL SUITE 300 (970) 476-4765. , VAIL, COLOR~ADO 61657 OF COUNSEL: e-mail: vaillaw@vail.net JERRY W. HANNAH ' CERTIFIED LEGALASSISTANTS KAREN M. DUNN, CLAS . JANICE K. SCOFIELD, CLA 27 October 1999 Town Council Town of Vail , Vail, Colorado Re: Appeal of Town of Vail Design Review - Carnie/Lauterbach Proposal This Firm represents Dome Investment Group (the owners of Condominium Unit 11, Potato Patch Club) and George and Elisabeth Ireland (the owners of Unit 16, Potato Patch Club). Each of our clients is also the owner of an undivided interest in the common elements of the Potato Patch Club. Our clients are, therefore, owners of properry adjoining that which is the subject of this letter. We have previously provided the Town with our letter of the 20th of October, 1999, advising the Town of our client's appeal of the decision of the Vail Design . Review Soard of that date related to the project sometimes known as Potato Patch Creek, and which is proposed by John A. Carnie and Joan T. Carnie, as owners, and Michael Lauterbach, as applicant. A copy of the application and the record of the decision of the Design Review Board accompany this letter. The purpose of this letter, together with the copy of the letter which is attached and which was provided to the Design Review Board, is to supply the information requested through the Town's "Appeals Form" to which this letter is attached. This appeal is being filed on the basis of the following issues: 1. The project involving the parcel owned by Mr. and Mrs. Carnie, requiring and including access across the general common elements of the Potato Patch Club, was presented to the Town as a single proposal, though which the staff appropriately and necessarily recommended requirements to be imposed regarding access. The access offered by the applicant crosses and affects the general common elements of the Potato Patch Club, which are owned by the owners of the Potato Patch Club. 1 2. The applicant was required to submit plans for the project which- accurately depict the proposal. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11- 4.C.l.a. and d. The submittals by the applicant were erroneous and misleading. Among the errors in tlus material were (a) the representation that there exists a forty-foot easement by which access to the project property was in place (which is false), (b) the failure to identify trees and 1`andscaping which would be damaged, eliminated or affected by the proposed road project (particularly between the proposed access road and the Potato Patch Club tennis courts), and (c) the misrepresentation that there existed only one post office delivery structure to be relocated, when there are, in fact, four such structures. 3. In processing the application for the Lauterbach/Carnie proposal, the , Town staff was required to analyze and determine that access was suitable. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-5.G. The staff appropriately identified a requirement for access. The staff determined that the access which was to be part of the project was to occur across the general common elements of the Potato Patch Club. However, no analysis occurred with reference to the impact of that access on the Potato Patch Club or its, owners, which is one of the design review criteria. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-1.D.5. . 4. The Town Staff then identified changes which must be made to the Potato Patch Club general common elements, and the applicant responded with plans for changes to those general common elements which again were developed without the agreement or participation of the owners of the general common elements, in violation of Vail Municipal Code, Section 12=1,1-4.C. In fact, the owners of the Potato Patch Club general common elements did not, at any time before or during processing, join in the application or participate in the process, with the exceprion of the involvement of our clients. The joinder of the owners of the Potato Patch Club general common elements in the application was a necessary prerequisite to the consideration of any aspect of this application. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-4.C.1. 5. Although the applicant.provided the Town with a resolution of the Board - of Directors of the Potato Patch Condominium Association with that representation that the resolution was a letter of intent to grant an easement, a review of that document establishes that it was no more than a tentative commitment to negotiate regarding that issue. 2 . , 6. The Town is required to confirm compliance with the zoning code and subdivision regulations with reference to the project, which included the general common elements of the Potato Patch Club. Vail Municipal Code, Secrion 12-11-4.C.2. With reference to the gerieral common elements of the Potato Patch Club which is part of the proposed project, that did not occur. 7. In processing the application for the Lauterbach/Carnie proposal, the Town staff was required to analyze and determine that utilities would be suitable. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-5.F. Neither the plans submitted by the applicant nor the Design Review Board dealt with utility access at all. The only reference to a utility easement on the plans submitted to the Town affirmarively states that the only access easement illustrated on any plat is undocumented. 8. The Design Review Board imposed conditions on approval of the projected which require changes in the general common elements of the Potato Patch Club. However, those conditions failed to recognize the necessity that such changes comply with Town land use regularions, and no analysis was accomplished in order ` to determine whether the required changes to the Potato Patch Club general common elements would adversely affect the Potato Patch Club or its owners, on either a . practical or regulatory basis, in violation of the Vail Municipal Code, Sections 12-11-1.D.5 and 12-11-4.C.2. For example, the increase in paving could affect the 60% requirement for landscaping,, and the widening of the existing driveway will eliminate existing parking within the Potato Patch club and may either cause the Club to become non- conforming or increase its non-conformity. If there is an assumption that utility lines are to pass through the Potato Patch Club, that is an impact which has been neither identified nor analyzed. 9. The Design Review Board imposed a condition that access be demonstrated prior to recordation of a plat of the Lauterback/Carnie parcel prior to recordation of any plat. Although requiring access as a condition of approval of the Lauterbach/Carnie proposal, the Design Review Board did not establish any criteria for the access. It could be a . five-foot wide foot path, or it could be a ten-foot wide jeep trail. The absence of consideration of the type of access required and the impact that part of the project on the owners of the Potato Patch Club effectively prevented satisfaction of the requirements of the Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-1.D.5, 12-11-S.G. _ 3 Other reasons for reversal of the decision of the Design Review Board may be . brought up at the hearing before the Town Council, but the foregoing will provide the Council with the general basis for the appeal. . The required list of adjoining landowners and stamped envelopes accompany thissmaterial. Again, please advise us of the date of any hearing on this appeal. We also ask, once again, that you confirm to us, and advise the applicant; that the , approval of this proposal is not final and will not be final until a decision is rendered by the Town Council. - ResPect ftft~ D NN, ABP P& URI O, P. . ~ ~ , Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr. . xc: Dome Investment Group Mr: and Mrs. George Ireland _ 4 - I Design Review Appeal - Lauterbach/Carnie Property Owners and Addresses: " - Owner of the Subject Property John A. Carnie and Joan T. Carnie 2920 Mann's Ranch Road Vail CO 81657 (believed to own fee title) Michael Lauterbach Post Office Box 3451 Vail CO 81658 (believed to be under contract to purchase property) Owners of Adjacent Property: Tract C, Vail/Potato Patch - Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail CO 81657 Lot 1, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing(744 Sandy Lane) Charles Ragan and Barbara Ragan 744 Sandy Lane Vai1 CO 81657 Lot 2, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing(746 Sandy Lane) Mr. Josef Stauffer 100 East Meadow Drive Vail CO 81657 Unit A, Lot 3, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing (742 Sandy Lane) Betty Guffey ' 742 Sandy Lane Unit A Vail CO 81657 Unit B, Lot 3, Vai1/Potato Patch Second Filing (742 Sandy Lane) Charles Paul and Geraldine Campisi Forest Drive Sand Point NY 11050 1 Unit A, Lot 4, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing (740 Sandy Lane) Mikell Holdings Co. LTD c/o Karl H. Fauland Post Office Box 4261 Vail CO 81658 Unit B, Lot 4, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing(740 Sandy Lane) Rican Investment Co. Ltd c/o Karl H. Fauland Post Office Box 4261 Vail CO 81658 , . Potato Patch Condominiums and general common elements (Send to condominium association pursuant to Section 12-3-3.C.3. of the Vail Municipal Code) Owners of Potato Patch Condominiums Potato Patch Condominium Association c/o Mr. Larry Barnes, Vail Home Rentals 143 East Meadow Drive - Suite 397 Vail CO 81657 Sun Vail Condominiums and general common elements (Send to condominium association pursuant to Section 12-3-3.C.3. of the. Vail 1Vlunicipal Code) Owners of Sun Vail Condominiums - Sun Vail Condominium Association c/o Mr. Kit Williarris Post affice Box 3655 Vail CO 81658 . 2 - ~ Qucstions? Ca11 thc Placlninb Stai: a: 47;-21 i213 APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL *ff, TOYf'N QGENERAL INF ORMATiON This application is for any Projcct rcquiring Design Rcvicw approval. Any projcct rcquiring dcsign revicw must rcccivc Design Review approval prior to submitting for a building pcrmit For specific information, see the su6nvttal rcquircmcnts for thc particular approval that is requcSted. Thc application cannot be acceptcd unril all the requircd inf'ormation is submittcd. Thc projcct may also nccd to bc.rcvictivcd by thc Town Council and/or thc Planning and Eiivironmental Commission. Design Review Board approval expires onc ycar aftcr final approval unless a building pcrmit is issued and construction is startcd. A. DESCR(PTION OE THE REQUEST: T~ A lopR o v1~} L FO R F<t f y k E's r~ ~Nc ~s 8:---_ ."LOCATtON OF"AROT'OSXL:-EOT: ---BLOCK: FILING: . PHYSICAL ADDRESS: ~~'S ~ o~ Po ?~Td P/4TG-T C Lv(S C. PARCEL d' 0~i 3 6 0 04 -3~Contact Eaglc Co. Assessors Officc at 970-328-8640 for parcel D. ZONING: I'C C E. NAME OF OWNER(S): ~ v ~ T. C A'kmIIE MAILING DDRESS: 02 9 Z 0 M A'MM'S A-KG 0&) 4-1 L cg 16)S PHONE: 7 F. OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S): G. NAME OF APPL ICANT: filtL#47 L (-R' C'-r;rkd~9-C-~( MAILING ADDRESS: 4 13 3 l V'~-/ L S(b a S PHONE: ~ 7( 9¢ H. TYPE OF REVIEW AND FEE: c..f~q . -10-0 CA-W • 0 New Consiruction - $200 Constcuction of a new building. ? Addition - $50 Includes any adciition where square footagc is added to any residential or corruncrcial buitding. ? Minor Alteiation - $20 Includcs minor changes to buildings and site improvcments, such as, rcroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fenccs and retaining _ _~_M... _ . , walls, etc. DRB fees are to be paid at the time of submittal. Later, whcn applying for a, building pemut, piease idenrify the accurate valuarion of thc project. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according to the project valuation. PLEASE SUBMI'I' THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAfL, COLORA,DO 81657. . . For-Officg~lse On1 - : : . ~ . ~ Fea Pai d CS~#' . . : . . . . . . . . . . ApPlicahoR . . . ~ : . . . . : . : Pre-;Apptication Mceang~.D~te ; ; . . : ~ Design Review Action Form i~ TOWN OF VAIL TOWA' OF VAiL ~ Project Name: Potato Patch Creek Project Number: Project Description: Development of 5 dwelling units in the Residential Cluster zone district Formerly known as the "Carnie Parcel." Owner, Address, and Phone: John and Joan Carnie 2920 Mann's Ranch Road, Vail CO 81657 ' 476-5140 ArchitectJContact, Address, and Phone: Michael Lauterbach PO Box 3451, Vail, CO 81658 476-6944 Project Street Address: East of Potato Patch Club - No address assigned Legal Description: Unplatted parcel located directly east of the Potato Patch Club Parcel Number: Building Name: - Comments: See conditions. Conceptual review conducted on October 6, 1999: Board/Staff Action Motion by: Aasland Action: Approval Seconded by: Pierce Vote: 4-0-1 (Gre,enauer abstaining) COIld1t10riS: 1. Prior to tlie recording of any plat or construction on the Carnie property, the ownerlapplicant shall secure legal access through the Potato Patch Club property via an access easement or similar uistrument. 2. Prior to the recording of any plat or construcrion on the Carnie property, the owner/applicant shall obtain written approval from the Potato Patch Club Homeowner's Association for completing driveway/access improvements (i.e., paving and grading) on the Potato Patch Club properiy. . 3. Final civil engineering plans musi be approved by the Town Engineer for the access road prior to application for a building permit.. 4. The appmval is specific to the Carnie property and does not extend lo property outside the subject parcel. Town Planner: Dominic Mauriello Date: 10/20/99 DRB Fee Pa.id: $250 Proj ect Name: Potato Patch Creek LAW OFFICES - DUNN; ABPLANALP & MAURIELLO, P.C. • PAO~ESSIONwI CORPONATION JOMN W. OUNN WESTSTAR BANK BUILDING TELEPMONE: ARTMUR A. ABPLANALP, JR. IOB SOUTM FRONTAGE ROAD WEST (970) 47G-03O0 DIANE MERMAN MAURIELLO . CARRIE HENDON O'NEIL . SUITE 300 FACSIMILE: - (970) 476-4765 - Oi COUNSEI: VAiL, COLORADO 81657 amail: vaillew@veil.net JERRY W. HANNAN GO OCtObeT 1797 CERTIfIED IEGAL ASSISTAN75 ' KAREN M. OUNN, ClAS JANICE K. SCOf'IELD, ClA Design Review Board - Town of Vail Vail, Colorado Re: Town of Vail Design Review Hearing - Carnie/Lauterbach Proposal • Members of the Board: This Firm represents Dome Investment Group (the owners of Condominium Unit 11, Potato Patch Club) and George and Elizabeth Ireland (the owners of Unit 15). The purpose, of this letter is to provide the Town with our clients' comments related to the deficiencies in the plan submitted to the Town, including but not limited to the lack of consent from the owners of the common elements of the Potato Patch Club whose modification the plan requires and assumes. Our clients' objections to the pIan include the following: 1. The enrire proposal assumes that access to the project across the common elements vf the Potato Patch Club has been agreed upon by the _ owners of the common property across which it must pass. That is not the case. The developer has submitted to the Town a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Potato Patch Club with the representation that it is evidence of a letter of intent to grant an easement, and apparently, of the purported agreement of the Potato Patch Club to the proposal. The resolution is evidence of neither a letter of intent nor the agreement of Potato Patch Club or its owners to the project. It is simply a commitment to negotiate, and the package presented to the Town, including but not hmited to the indication that there exists a 40-foot wide easement (which .is false) has little relationship to the proposal which was originally taken to the PPC and which generated this resolution. There is no agreement, formal or informal, between Mr. Lauterbach or Mr. Carnie and the Potato Patch Club Board of Directors regarding a 40-foot wide easement through the Potato Patch Club. Even the discussions with the Potato Patch Club have been limited to only a 25-foot wide easement, and they have not touched upon any ather impacts on or modifications of the Potato Patch Club or its common areas. 2. The impact on the. Potato Patch Club and its owners has not been approved by the Potato Patch Club or its owners. In fact, half the presentation involves changes to the Potato Patch Club, including changes to the location of parking areas, coverage of open space by asphalt, relocation of the central postal box location, and-eliminarion of existing parking spaces, and dramatic changes in landscaping. None of these changes have been discussed with the Potato Patch Club or the Potato Patch owners, and the Town has received no suggestion that the Potato Patch Club or its owners have joined in either the application or in the conceptual or final-stages of this zeview process; as required by the Vail Municipal Code at 12-11-4.B.1. and C.I. 3. The zoning may permit the creation of as many as six units on the Carnie parcel, but the current configuration fails to provide adequate ingress . and egress. That omission will create impact on Potato Patch Club both. because (a) it's properry is the access people will use on a practical basis and (b) its parking area will be the parking area people will use as a. necessity. , 4. The emergency access may satisfy technical requirements, assuming that at the rime of any emergency, no one is parked out of the designated area of the Unit 4 driveway. That cannot be assumed or even assured. Therefore, no turnaround is provided for emergency vehicles. Even if it were assumed, only one fire vehicle could possibly get into this project and be assured of the ability to escape. In the absence of adequate fire protection, any fire will travel uphill, toward, across and through the Potato Patch Club. Such problems do not warrant even design approval. 5. Even when viewed on the basis of anticipated conventional use; the road system does not provide even a bare minimum of access. There is no allowance for visitors, deliveries or other traffic beyond the basic traffic generated by the occupants themselves. 6. The access proposed across the front of the hill will create several walls above the face of the hill. If the property were developed less intensely, . it is possible that this raad could be constructed in a way in which it has less impact. The proposal should not be approved unless ther`e is confirmation that the road cannot be constructed in any other way. 7. Tllere has been no analysis regarding the effect of the proposed changes on the Potato Patch Club with reference to whether that project conforms or whether the changes will make it either nonconforming or more non- confomung. For example, the specific impacts upon the.owners within the Potato Patch Club which have not received analysis include the following: a. Widening and extending the exisring driveway through the Potato Patch Club, and the proposed paving acrivities, will affect the , exisring open space within the Potato Patch Club, thereby affecting the percentage of open space within the Potato Patch Club and the ability of the Club and its owners to develop additional area which is now undeveloped. Will the widening of the access road and paving make the Potato Patch Club or its residences non- conforming or aggravate nonconformity with reference to open space requirements and/or parking? b. Widening the road may make existing units non-conforining with - reference to setbacks and parking requirements which now may be satisfied or somewhat satisfied by spaces between the garages and the street, or adjacent to the existing street. Will the widening of the road affect compliance of the residences or other improvements within the Potato Patch Club with applicable design and zoning requirements? c. Taking out vegetation and trees in the area of the new roadway which has been proposed by the developer and- installation af considerable new landscaping within the area of the Potato Patch Club affected by that plan represent dramaric changes in that area of the project. Based upon the information available, it seenns that no analysis has been done regarding the impacts of these activities on the Potato Patch Club. 8. The proposal assumes significant changes to the properry owned by - Potato Patch Club owners and construction of a modified access road across properry owned, in undivided interests, by tlie Potato Patch Club owners. . The common properry of the Potato Patch Club owners is truly part* of this project, which is illustrated by the fact that more than half of the area covered by the plan illustrates the effect on the existing Potato Patch Club. What is missing is the consent of the owners of the Potato Patch Club and the common properry across which the road is to be newly constructed, widened and realigned, all of which will affect every properry owner in Potato Patch Club between the entry and the site of the proposed new development. The Municipal Code pernuts the owner or authorized agent of any project requiring design approval as prescribed by the Design Review provisions of the Municipal Code to submit plans for conceptual review and requires the owner or authorized agent of any project requiring design approval to submit material for final design approval. It doesn't matter whether considerarion is conceptual or final approval, the Town requires the signatures of the owners of property which is the subject of a project. The consent of the owners of half the land affected by this project has not been required or submitted in tliis case, and the effect of the proposed project upon the parking, site coverage and landscaping within the Potato Patch Club illustrates the reason for this requirement. The changes proposed for the Potato Patch Club are dramatic and affect the Club as a whole. Those changes are an inherent part of this project. For that reason alone, the fact that the application and plan lacks the approval of the Potato Patch Club owners, this project should be denied until such time as a package can be presented which has the consent of all affected owners, including not only the owners of the Carnie properry but also the owners of the Potato Patch Club across whose land the proposed access road passes. The addirional facts that the irnpacts of the proposed changes to the Potato Patch Club have not received any analysis, and that the proposed change operates to defeat public safety further aggravate the fundamental problem. The project should not receive design review approval without resolution of these issues. Very s, UNN, ABP & U O, C. Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr. xc: Dome Investment Group Mr. and Mrs. George Ireland ~ #Z i 1 =zo~ PROPOSED FIRE TRUCK ~ U aal TURNING RADIUS EXHIBIT ` PEDJ~ ~ W.A SCALE I' a 20' qu El'V. ~ 1258 1 i ( " UMP7 EIEV.. 8149.3' I ~1 OiZ~ ~ %P~ U JI~„ ~8 I 1 O Q g u~o A Y. 4 X °mm• < W o~ SCALE: 1" = 20'_ ~ N PNONE ~ Q y ro' I ~ nm 9C~F0 curvoE mxnnc iOiQ fAT ACREIGE = 1.366 Ac. (59.500 Sq. FtJ W aeoius -.s LLJ 3 145iDE N4NMC PRn'OSCO fIAE • \ B TOUL ARFA IN IXCE$$ OF IOx $LOPE = 3630 5¢ fl. f~ I R~I15 . 30• ~'JP tiRMNG L.~ I " PAp115 h \ ~ • I a ' Up .WFAS iN 5 Cf SLO \ a ~ ~ IMpUlES QCE5 MS PE go ~ ~ 21 1! iJl 1 Z= Q ~ o 5 ` 0,7 o i. ~ . • , ~ - \ NY i1D~U(lN0 CL I. ~(TIP, ~ W Q ~ nRE ' 71'M9.S3' . \ ~ PNOPOSEA xDUfES u+ VERGFFEn iRCE ~ ~ A1 CM WM IIS /POi01. OMe1ER ~ J . . ` ~ L~~ UNIT 14 ~ Q + r " no-utcs A occcucus ,vf¢ Q wtM iS Iv-fi71COIwEtER > ~ ~ a 1 1f1V \ , ~ r ~SE-ER MMHOLE Voir `p~mtm [in. : ei~ o .r CLC:,E UNR 13 4 ar wnH rts b./ xv ~ :eaua ;.f ~ I n SE1e~ r Nv ar . e2eze 0 i.ox I urv vro PROPOSM EDGE na rra a . ~OMAIM ~ ~ O~ ~...um;ntAuuvn (APPNOMIWi[, HOf fULLY ~ UIYE1490NED Ox vUn 1 (n ~ NEN90NS IS CaURT TENNIS COURi 0 ,mta ~ ~av TMici 5 A ! ~ z wv n .mu.s 1Ce UNR 12 iu / s.~ ~ ~ iNv a nx.e ~Of/ 0I' I ~ R 60.0' ~7}AFES O pp yp MPQ A v r . az~~, cn w cuR cw.a a sn~ ~ i ~ l ~If?~~' ` ~~j UNIT 11 / n N0°raa~art /1 ~ 7-c) R S'~ ~ a ~ao' EMISTNG TAO C M 21 P~PofFGMEA WM Ai tf1Sf c 3` H19R1Hi 3' OF CIMAIRµa ro mcc u= R Pew 0 . ~ lCE 6 ~ R 20'~ iPIE N c x . LCE - io o. rFViw (m.) / ~ s n-ki Yxa m La r E ro , c ~ ~ ~w~su ~ o ~ 03'' --2 w~aM /v ~aw ¢tv. . e~za.r m[ ~ ec wo~o ca e~ie.i~ =00.6 'AM (M.) y ..6' . 7AEI 10 (NVO E?CF d ' ~ ,df~~~ / PROPoSD OPo -0 [WI O~RIlM..tlMTi~LL ~ . .,c~f L o UNIT 10 ~o.e• , ~B~rTNEwa DE9GNED: Mi ' ~RUO ~la Mmc~vypi r a fi ORANN: MT -'/x RENENEO: JE PLC JOBp: 75 R 8 UNIT 9 PED-p uwc k u-siTE voiar a' ~o.c rc.., • 6-.~ ~ L qe. ~s ~ 1 \ DA7E: 9/29/99 37. BEGinNIxc~-~. S 4757'Y - I059.19' ~g~~ ~ S 89'55' W - 336.55' ,,,~,,,.J ~ a aw~c a sa Pm. ~ EXNIBIT iui Ig w'-Aaax aw~a i ro a er a Saac a arosm u ren~ Ci 1 ~ SN ^.CF4ER :TC. 6 p7MF Wl AAMI MUES 2-1 OR BETRR 30FC MNL (IW) / / 7 5 S. P 80 h, 51h P.Y. SNf6&i1P0YG?J3iMN~ WA~L ~x+ru w+.ro~~ y , ~ I o C - nini oiv • eilss : 1' / ~ . n~ n a ° F, D O, u o C) C ~ e ss. ; i ~,E~ - tto .n h N . a 1 ° ~ m o O 01' V a• ~ o.r + ~ , ; - , } PROPOSED SITE AREA P!ttNT LIST UIJI( i4 1 .p, / cnnnu w,.l . _ _ K~ ...=BOiANIfJ~L wU1E COMMON NAME OTY. SIZE PEMARN$ ~ L ~ ~ \ ~ , 1 \ TREES: PP PICfA PUNCENS COtOwt00 SPflUCE JO N/A 512E5 NO7ED ON GUN W ~ PA PpPUUS AUGI1SfIfOLN NAAROwIEIf COTiDNWOpD 11 2 111' bL ! ~ VT POVUlUS TREMUl01DE5 OUNaNG ASPEN 12 2 1/2' G11. UNIT 13 raocasto ~ +U 4 oecm ntv. . msa.r r x~,~, I --,t , I I U ShRUBS: cs COPNUS SERICFA rteo rxic oawooo io T cu l ~ ~ : ~ an vm It OSEp ~ i5 JUNIPEPUS SA81NA 'BUflILO' BUFF0.l0 JUNIPER 7 ]GAL ~ O i I 01~, ~ . ~ --aI~s upNUM Q w.a eeJ~ g OO AI.71NE YELLOW CURNMR 9 5 G!L v / ~ 1 r SauBULUS PUBENS NaTNE F10ER 8 5GAy o J uuwar x ~ ~sr vnm y 1VROxuuiF. MDt FVU r D+maioitD an Mq SP SRINGI % PRESTONUE GNIMW LMC 12 7 GAL < O RT 0 4D V18URNUM DENiATUM ARROWHFAD YgUANUAI 9 7 G1L cL J ~ '~~;I UNIf 12 _ GROUND FO'.LL POM/f PtANfING ARFAS TO VuvF CEHEHNUL AND NIHUA1 ROWERS .NO cnauHOCOKxs. > / u! COVER: _SEIECTiON5 WILL BE DEtERMINEp Ai iHE iuAE Oi' -PIANiING, JUE TO iNE SEASONK AVMIBIUfY Oi np5 mE 0F PIANi wiEpuL O ~o cw ~ m NQTE: Al1 OISIUPBEO AqFAS f0 BE NEVECE7A1E0 WRH NA ! l 'r / / fnKLro[~m e ~ , :61s~ _ f~ / / I I 1NE CWSSES AND WILROWEH SEED pl%. b ~ I _ I PAlPO-$p iNA[[ LM GMACC ` ~l' I I •f~ UNIT I I ~HmN N~ PROPOSED CONCE°TUAL RESIDENTIAL PLANT UST (rrnICAL rwrt usr aen Moiecsrtt) Y u.rY KCY ~BOiuriCN. ruuE CODUOrv tuHE Ott. S2E REwxKS ae cKisnHC MB uuus eRwzrw . wroxnxt ~ 4 s\ u ur'..-._ TREES: BMNDYYIINE CPABMPIE 4 Y 1/2' G4. rvNOI[ tPCE Idl d .l y _ -1 i - ei~ uO~ED q0 bU 0RM PP PICFA PVNCENS COlOM00 SVkUCE J N/A SIlES NOiEO ON PLAN . tncc Pro.~ ~0 a,. , ai• ~ J'"`_ nq c ~ .1 ae coPUws wcusnrow waaowicu conor+wooo s 2 t/s Cx. o . t SnWp IW,MWIE Pf POPULUS ifiCYUl010ES OUNfINC ISPEN R 1 • e' ~ o. ` O / I / 1 / y / I~ ~Y ELLY. . Vn l' 4 " 0 " 1/7 ' L G , o. ;0. • 1' ~ ' • ! ' i~t~ . / unEm nn. . e21e.1- . ':00' . . '~n,..~•~~ BT~ PAu PSEUppi5UG1 YEN2IESII OpUGUS Flp 4 21/I'Gl ap'USCD OFi1 „ :Oe' \ q • ' 'S n owg2qQ~~ ~,p ~ / J ~ - i0 o.e + • ~ 19 ~i ~ SHRU85: cs coeHUS s[Rku e[o iwic oocwooo 6 5 CAL - . aa ~ i • CSM CTIISUS SCOPARIUS 'MOONUp1Y A100NlICNT BR004 10 5 GAL . ~ ~ ~ ~ . + . ~ ~ ' _ / . ~ 1 • J/i JAMCSU IJ/ERICAMI WN(FLOWER 6 ~y GAL G . ' \ : j - nCD\ 4- JS ~ - JU r NIPEpUS SABINA BUPfAlO BUFPALO JUNIPER 3 5 Gl m y1~-I>~1 ` • ~ - e , ~ yu T J ~ . _ -auoWStY' S'~'_ j, "PM PHYSOCMPU$ GONOCYNU$ MOUN7AIN NINEBMK J 5 G1L _ V Ml ~N U _ s : wP ~u.~ ~ one~xc[ n+sx bg 55'~W 336.55' ' w+Cr~5C0 Ml~w+l6 ~ ~ p ~ PSIA PINUS MUGMU o Y Q/ ~22 \ 4UC0 PINE 2 s cu m rx coantx s[c e " u;~+=.I ~'wuus-+.u a' t~u' a~un . r e s. A o~. - v~_mc au ww Ai .i.sJ; 5 PNOPOXD I:f`BqlO[A xo. ~ - - - _ s a ae.r.wrt-+e rna i / / saoc SG arIUS GInBRA CiS u0N1AfU ROCNy yOUNINN SUNAC 1 7 GAl a uw~t = ~ / . . SC SWBUCUS 7UBCN5 N4fIVE qpE q J 5 CAl SP SYRINGA % PRESIONIAE GNAOLW UUC I 7 G>l _ Z w ~ . "0 NBURNUM O(NiAfUM MflOWI{FM YIBUNNUM m 1 S GAl G U ~ ~ - ~~=LIN11NAf~Y _~'1~JC?JCArDE PLAN G30UN0 ALL OtRNED PWIIING HEOS 10 MAYE PENCNNUL ANO ANNUFI FIOwCR$ AND GHOUNOCOKRS. COVEI3; SClEC1lUNS wILL OE OCICR4IN[p AI IME iIMC OF PLWYiNC, OUE ID fM( SfA50t1AL AVI1LABIUR' OF THIS IYPE Of PW1T AIAI(qlµ. . . . NOIE. N.L OISIUFOEO AHEAS i0 BC REy(CCIAICD Wi1H MAi1vE GMSSES H+0 wlLflOwCR SEED uiM. ;cni.F- 1° = 20'-0" i - . o ~ i- W J T . 4VAIL TOWN OF 75 South Frontage Road - • • , Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TM The parcel shown on the map on the back side of this page, zoned Residential Cluster (allows up to 6 dwelling units per acre), is currently under review for a proposed single- family residential development of 5 dwelling units.. The project is currently scheduled for review by the Design Review Board on August 18, 1999, however this date could , change. This notice is being provided to you as a courtesy as it is not required by the Town Code. If you have any questions regarding the project or want to review the application you may do so at the Community Development Department located at 75 S. Frontage Roacl, Vail, CO 81657. You may also contact the Project Planner for this application, Dominic Mauriello, at 970- 479-2148. The Design Review Board agenda will be available on our website 24 hours prior to the meeting - vail.net/tov. , , RECYCLED PAPER , ¦ ~ Location M-ap o~3t I TRACT A 81DdC1 BW 30 ~ , VAIL POTATO PATC POTATO P ~ TDWNNOMEB ~ ~O 766 10 ~ 2,3 4 - - ~52 m A ~ TRACT p omaamm 00p°~° TATO PATCH DR 3 5 ' r ~5e ` ` ?a . 2 J AT ATC ~JJ <f~~ i~ 'c~~> >sa ~ ^ ~ n IL 2 ; 1` 5 T!E - 748 POTAT~ ~A~QNjC L: ; . s~w - 740 r 742 2 7m ~TALRiANT V 744 , ' 97 ou Blli 1 POTATO PATCN SµDSroNE CLIIBCOPNOMIIYUN ~ ~ - PARK REpBAIip9TONEE:EM1ENTARY i ~ ~ rl- 1 ~'~::~i:%:: SE7 - AR90K7R£E J~L'f 1\ L`~ \v~? . 890 TRACT C PK48E 1 ~10 ] AS N PHASE nt PHASE a 005 TR gm aa+ rwSE 3 ow U18lATTf_D 1 2 893 A 91INVNL I ~ 8B7 . 19, RED DSTONECIR TRACT x 5 P V 9ab ~ 9" 7- ' m a VAIL LIONSHEAD ~ A" s~ FILING 4 9 ~3 o L,e, SMDS,ONE 1 TRACTB ~ FILI G 9 70TLaT NOR7}IUAY ANDSTONE a ea, `mpw `p' so - 70 ~ aea ~ U YAILCi-0 ~ . g{ 979 ~U 71 B/5 701 B7a L~~LLO ~ LANDPAARK >CTO TPACTA 12 ' I as . 810 9R5 ~ 7 n '818 . N Subject Property E " S ~~~~l. ~4~ ~ JOINT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS OF THE POTATO PATCH CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. WHEREAS, the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Association") is currently a party to certain litigation initiated by John A. Camie and Joan T. Carnie (the "Carnies") requesting the condemnation of a certain easement over property owned by the Association in order to obtain access to a landlocked parcel of land located adjacent toAssociation property and currently owned by the. Carnies (the "Carnie Property"). ~ WHEREAS, the Association has been advised that the Carnies may desire to sell their property to MJL Development Inc. and/or Michael J. Lauterbach and/or their assigns or affiliates,(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Potential Purchaser"). WHEREAS, initial discussions have taken place between authorized representatives of the Association and the Potentia] Purchaser concerning the purchase of the Carnie Property and the possible grant of an access easeinent over Association property by the Association to Potential Purchaser. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Association have reached a general understanding with Potential Purchaser regarding the process by which Potential Purchaser could obtain an access easement from the Association at an agreed upon location if Potential Purchaser actually obtains title to the Carnie Property. WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser obtains approval of the Town of Vail (and all other governmental entities with jurisdiction over the subject property) "for Potential Purchaser's development plans and specifications (the "Plans and Specifications") with respect to the Carnie Property, the prospects of a transfer of title to the Carnie Property to the Potential Purchaser are greatly increased. WHEREAS, in order to obtain approval of the Plans and Specifications for the development of the Carnie Property, Potential Purchaser has advised the Association that Potential Purchaser requires a letter of intent from the Association agreeing to grant to Potential Purchaser an easement for ingress and egress over Association property to the Carnie Property at the location specified in the Plans and Specifications. WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser is able to acquire the Carnie Property and obtain from the Association the easement for ingress and egress more particularly described herein, the litigation filed by the Carnies with respect thereto could be dismissed and the Association could be released from the obligation to defend such action. WHEREAS, on June 4, 1999 the Boai•d of Directors of the Association adopted a resolution (by a vote of six to two) recommending that the Board of Directors bring to the owners and members of the Association at the annua] meeting; a resolution authorizing the Association to pursue the matters more particularly described herein. 417498 1 RCiAI.T 0911199 2 _ i7 P11 ~ NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, in accordance with Section 183 ).4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Condominiums: 1. The Board of Directors of the Association is hereby authorized to grant an easement for ingress and egress to Potential Purchaser upon satisfaction of all of the terms and conditions therefor set forth in this Resolution. 2. The grant of the subject easement for ingress and egress (the "Easement") shall be subject to the satisfaction of each and every one of the following conditions by Potential Purchaser: (a) Acquisition of the Carnie Property by Potential Purchaser; (b) Final plat approval by the Town of Vail of the Plans and Specifications for development of the Carnie Property (the "Development"); (c) The Development shall contain no more than five (5) single family residences and shall, not exceed 3,500 square feet GRFA, developed and built in accordance with the site plan attached hereto; (d) A 30 foot setback from the Association's easf property line shall be . established in the Plans and Specifications and maintained by Potential Purchaser; - (e) The Easement shall not be more than 25 feet in width, and the turning radius of the Easement within the Association property must be approved by the Town. of Vail Fire Department and the Association Board of Directors; (f) The written evidence of the Easement must provide that all costs of surveying, complying with Town of Vail planning requirements, all construction (including road construction), landscaping and rounding of the entrance, as well as the restoration of any Association property which is altered or damaged during construetion, shall be borne solely by Potential Purchaser; (g) Potential Purchaser shall, upon execution of the formal documentation of the Easement, pay to the Association the sum of $250,000, which shall be allocated by the Association as condemnation award damages as specified in Section 33.4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club Condominiums; (h) The written documentation of the Easement shall contain, or coincide with other documentation executed by the Association and Potential Purchaser, a full settlement of the Carnie litigation with prejudice; (i) The Easement shall not be granted until such time as Potential Purchaser has obtained fee title to the Carnie Property; (j) Upon issuance of and in conjunction with the execution of a letter of intent to grant the Easement to Potential Purchaser by the Association, the Carnies must agree and stipulate to a reasonable continuance and vacation of the trial date and ananx 1 RGAt.i ns.,,'qq, 57 Pni 2 . I abatement of all legal proceedings in the current condemnation litigation, pending completion of the Town of Vail planning process with respect to the Plans and Specifications of Potential Purchaser for the Development. FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Association is hereby authorized to issue a non-binding letter of intent to the Potential Purchaser specifying the parameters and limitations with respect to the Easement set forth above and any other limitations and/or conditions required by the Board of Directors or counsel for the Association for the possible grant of the Easement to Potential Purchaser. Such letter of intent must contain an acknowledgment by the Potential Purchaser that the issuance of the letter of intent and the execution of the Easement shall in no way be construed to be an approval by the Association (or any of its members) of the Development or the Plans and Specifications, and that all mennbers of the Association and the Association itself reserve all rights to participate in any Town of Vail planning process relating to the development of the Carnie Property. Potential Purchaser must further acknowledge that certain members of the Association may be opposed to the grant of the Easemerrt and may actively participate in such Town of Vail planning process. FURTHER RESOLVED, that within the limitations and parameters set forth above, the Board of Directors of the Association shall be and is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate, eYecute and, as necessary, record the above-described letter of intent and the final definitive written Easement in conjunction with counsel for the Association, and to negotiate a f nal settlement of the Carney litigation, NA-ith prejudice, as of the result of the grant of the Easement. , FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors is and shall be authorized, empowered and directed to eYplore the possibility of creating a sub-association with respect to the final approved development of the Carnie Property for the purposes of: (a) sharing the cost of maintenance, repairs and snow removal for the Easement; (b) access to and appropriate cost sharing in the maintenance, repair and capital improvements to the common elements of the Association, including the tennis courts, pool, spa and health club; and _ (c) . to amend the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club Condominiums to include the above-described provisions, subject to the approval of the owners and mortgagees of units within the Association as required by such Declaration, with such other terms and conditions contained therein as may be required by the Board of Directors and counsel for the Association as appropriate. ~417498 1 RG.4LT 08.%2199 2 i7 PM ' ~ ~ The undersigned, as President of the Association, hereby certifies that the Resolutions contained herein were duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors and the members of the Association at the annual meeting of the Association conducted on July 2, 1999 and the subsequent Board of Directors meeting held immediately thereafter. - Thomas J. Gargan, M.D., esiden f the, Association Approved and accepted this ~ day of st 999. Michael J. Lau rbach 417498 1 RGALT 09/2l49 ^_57 p\1 4 December 1, 1999 Vail Town Council 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear TC Members: Enclosed is a fairty recently completed resume that provides you with a lot of information that you probably don't want to know. The things that you do need to know are pretty simple. I have worked with most of you over the past few years on a variety of projects and I thirik my commitment to Vail. is clear. Having led the battle for the return of the Business License Fee to Vail, this newly formed Marketing District is an alternative to what we were attempting to achieve. The future of Vail lies in our ability to survive in an industry that is more competitive than our founder's could ever have imagined. But survival isn't enough. We need to position ourselves in the millenium so that we are able to regain our number one rating and return Vail to the glorious position that it held in the past, a time when Vail was the bench mark against which all other ski resorts were measured. But more than that, we have to revitalize this Town so that every one who works here and lives here and visits here recognizes this community as the leader in the industry and a joyful place to be. I believe very strongly in the Town of Vail and I am commited to returning it to its premier position. 1 r 1riCP1' , ~ KATHLEEN V. FERRY 2395 BALD MOUNTAIN RQAD VAIL, COLORADO 81657 BUSINESS EXPERIENCE 11/91 to present The Grind, Vail, Colorado Owner/Operator Own and operate a coffee shop that also serves a wide variety of food items. It also operates as a full service bar that provides entertainment in the evening. 11/91 to present Vail Associates, Vail, Colorado Ski instructor 3/95 to 12/98 Aspen Mountain Coffee Roasters, Aspen, Colorado Owner/Operator Owned and operated a coffee roasting facility in the Roaring Fork Valley. 6/93 to 4/99 Vail Mountain Coffee Roasters, Minturn, Colorado Owner/Operator Owned and operated a coffee roasting facility in the Vail Valley. 1//84 to 1/89 Vidmar Buick, Joliet, Illinois Owner/Manager Managed the Employment Department of a family owned business. Also had responsibilily for the Customer Order Department. 2/68 to 9/70 The Lange Company, Broomfield, Colo. Personnel Director Responsible for over 1000 factory positions and an office and sales staff of 125 in Colorado, Iowa and Canada-hiring, wage aild salary administration,training programs, policy and administrative handbOOkS. 6/66 to 2l68 Marsh and McLennan, Chicago, Illinois Personnel Director Responsible for corporate office functions of major inter- national company-hiring,wage and salary administration, corporate and college grad training programs,policy and administrative manuals on a corporate basis and specifically for a 650 staff office in Chicago. (over) 12-61-1999 01 :36PM FROM PROPERTy 8 HOTEL M[MT. TO 19704792157 P. 92 ` F~C~ct. ~d i ~ t I ' Evergreen Lodge ~ I V A 1 L t I December 1.1999 ~ ~ Sent Via FAX_ 970-479-2157 ; f i . ~ Ms. Pam Brandmeyer i Assistant Tawn Manger ~ VAIL TOWN GOVERNMENT i 75 S. Frontage Road West ~ Vail, Colorado 81657 I ' Dear Ms. Brandmeyer. ~ Via this letter I wish to express my interest in a position on the local Marketing Distrid Advisory ~ Board. Currently I am involved as an ownership partner and officer of the management team ~ af Evergreen Lodge at Vail. I first came to Vail in 1969, became a r+esidential property owner in ~ fhe `70's and business owner 1986 and again in 1992. ' My irrterest in becaming a Board member is generated by a desire to increase business in the i area and to see an improvement guest experience and service. As a participant in lodge ; ownership and operations ! recagnize the importance ot developing and maintaining the flow of ~ visitors to the Valley and am vitaAy concemed that the experience guests have be of highest ; quality, whether they are here for work, play or a combination of the two. My previous . ~ professional experience includes serving as Public Relations Manager for Vail and 8eavel' ~ Creek Resorts from 1980 through 1996. Subsequently I started a public relations firm working with clients as AEI Wor1d Forum in Beaver Creek; American Ski Cfassic; Aspen Skiing Company; Breckenridge Resort Westin Hotel, Vai(; C{arion Hotels & Resorts; Radisson Hotel, Denver, and Sybervision Sports, focusing on marketing and distribution of the ski related series. ~ ~ If positions remain open on the Board 1 am anxious to move to the next step. 1 wiil be available 4 to meet with you or a selection committee at your convenience and can be reached either at ~ Evergreen Lodge, 970-476-7814 ar on my ce11 phone, 303-601-2098. I laok forward to talking with you soon. ' Sincerely, 1 CZ~~~.. ~ Pamela Stenmark ( Vice President, Marketing & Project Devefopment PS/sgp 250 South Frontage Road Wast Vail, Colorado 81657 303-476-7810 FAX 303-476-4504 Reservctions only 800-284-8245 t ~ Memorandum To: Town Council From Nina Timm Date: December 7, 1999 Subject: Commercial Linkage Program Attached please find a memo from Kathy McCormick, McCormick and Associates, Inc., the consultant the Town retained to facilitate a public process on Commercial Linkage. Her memo summarizes what was included in the Council packets on November 23, 1999. This memo will be the outline for her presentation at the work session on December 7, 1999. In this presentation Ka.thy will outline the key policy questions that Council will need to address as well as provide an outline for next steps. : . . : Town of Vai! - Commercia/ Linkage MEMORANDUM TO: Town of Vail FROM: Kathy McCormick McCormick and Associates, Inc. DATE: December 2, 1999 RE: Commercial Linkage PURPOSE: The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a foltow-up to the report presented to Council in November. That report summarized the research done to date regarding commercial linkage programs in resort communities. This memo focuses on the issues which council may wish to consider when creating a linkage program. The suggested next steps for proceeding with the development of a program are also included in this material. BACKGROUND: The Town of Vail is interested in implementing a commercial linkage program as one approach to be used to produce housing that is affordable to area woFkers. To further this effort, research was done in five resort communities to ascertain the following: 1. The amount of affordable housing that was created as a result of the linkage program; 2. The methods used to create the housing (e.g. fees, taxes, on-site or off-site development); 3. The impact on local businesses as a result of implementing the linkage program; and 4. The economic impact to the community. In addition to this research, two series.of focus groups were conducted with representatives of hotels, bars/restaurants and institutional/real estate and retail businesses. The first series of focus group was designed to provide an overview of a commercial linkage program and solicit in-put from focus group participants. The second series of focus groups provided an opportunity for more in-depth discussion about a commercial linkage program and its perceived impacts and opportunities for the Town of Vail. OVERVIEW: Current Program Currently, the Town of Vail has a goal to house 62% of its workforce in the community and is focusing efforts to achieve this goal. Examples of developments undertaken by the town to meet this goal include Vail Commons, Buzzard Fark, the buy down program, and Red Sandstone. Timber Ridge has been noted as a primary source of employee housing (198 units). In the focus groups, it was noted that Timber Ridge is an important source of affordable rental housing and efforts need to be directed toward retaining . McCormick and Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 5 . Town of Vail - Commercral Linkage ; Timber Ridge as affordable housing. One suggestion was to grant additional density in exchange for redeveloping the site as affordable housing. Other programs are also under consideration at this time. The efforts currently underway in Vail are important, particularly considering some of the findings from the Eagle Valley Housing Needs Survey that was completed in July, 1999. Some of the findings support continued efforts in the arena of affordable housing: 1. Approximately 42% of employers surveyed plan to increase the number of : persons they employ; • 2. Avon and Vail house the lowest percentage of their workers - 30% to 35% respectively. Approximately 65% of Vail's residents who work are employed in Vail; and 3. Commercial linkage and inclusionary zoning was supported by 70% of county residents. LINKAGE PROGRAMS: Creating affordable housing has often been described as a patchwork quilt - many pieces are patched together to create an overall housing program. Linkage Programs , are one piece of an overall effort and are focused on the housing needed to "keep up" with demand for housing generated as a result of new development. Linkage programs do not correct a current deficit; however, without linkage programs the community continues to fall behind in meeting its housing needs. The basic premise of linkage programs is that new commercial development brings employees to an area, which increases the demand for housing which is affordable to those employees. The housing market will supply new units at prices and rents that cover the cost of new construction, including land, but will not provide housing at prices and rents below the cost of construction. In a high-cost area, such as Vail, land prices have been escalating rapidly and the cost of new construction tends to be high, placing it out of reach of many low and moderate-income employees. If affordable housing is not provided to meet the demand from new workers, the result is increasing pressure on the existing affordable housing stock. Specific impacts include higher prices and lower - availability (low vacancy rates), as well as increased commuting from lower cost areas. Commercial linkage programs attempt to mitigate these problems by requiring developers to contribute to the provision of affordable housing that is consistent with the income of persons employed within the development, particularly the lower and moderate wage groups who cannot afford market rate housing. FOCUS GROUP SUMMARY: The memo provided to Council on November 23`d provides a thorough synopsis of the focus group discussions held in October. A follow-up session was held on November 301h. Generally, focus group participants recognize that a commercial linkage program is one part of an overall housing strategy and finding employees has been difficult due to a lack of affordable housing. The primary concerns expressed by the focus groups is that the mitigation requirement should not be so onerous as to stymie new commercial development and redevelopment in Vail. There is also a concern about where new employee housing could be located, given the constraints on available land in Vail. For McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 2 of 5 . ; Town of Vail - Commercia/ Linkage smaller employers, there is a concern about how the costs of mitigation would be passed on to them. There was also discussion about the types of housing to be produced (rental vs. for-sale) and the type of worker for whom the housing should be targeted (seasonal workers vs. full-time residents). There were individuals form the hotel and institutional groups that were cautiously supportive while others did express concern about moving forward. Some suggestions made by focus group participants that are worth considering included: • Implementing a countywide property tax to address the current shortage of employee housing; • Exchanging forest service land for open space and using that land for housing; • Requiring a lower level of mitigation for housing developed within the town and a higher mitigation requirement if the units are located down valley; • Providing an incentive, such as additional density, to help off-set the mitigation requirements; and • Providing additional density at Timber Ridge to enhance the potential that it would be redeveloped at some future time as employee housing. PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS: Five resort communities were interviewed to learn more about their linkage programs. It became clear through these interviews that the local goals, priorities and opportunities were carefully considered when developing a program. For example, Teton County was concerned with housing for seasonal workers and allows off-site development as well as acquisition of existing housing to be used to meet the mitigation requirements. Through the focus groups, constraints that must be considered by the town when establishing a commercial linkage program were discussed. The most notable constraint is the lack of available sites upon which additional employee housing could be constructed. Although this may be the case, there was also a sense that a"modest" linkage program would be important to indicate that new development is contributing toward solving the employee housing problem. Following are some of the issues to be considered further prior to implementing a linkage program: 1. What level of mitigation should be required? Legally, a community can require 100% mitigation based on the results of a nexus analysis; however, most communities do not seek full mitigation. This is because a balance has to be struck between the amount of housing to be produced and the costs associated with its productions. If the cost is too high, then commercial development and redevelopment may be stymied. For example, Aspen requires 60% of employee housing needs to be mitigated and has seen very little new commercial development over the fast five years. Vail is in a period of desired re-development and would have to carefully consider the balance between needed re-development and addressing housing issues. 2. Where should the housing be {ocated? Many communities require that the housing be built as part of the new development or located within the McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 3 of 5 r Town of Vail-Commercia/ Linkage t community. Due to the constraints of available land for development, Vail may wish to consider allowing development to occur down valley. One suggestion is to have a lower mitigation level for housing developed within the community and a higher requirement if the units were produced down valley. 3. Would cash-in-lieu be acceptable? Most communities provide for a cash- in-lieu payment, particularly for smaller projects. Usually, there is a desire to have the units built because of a perception that cash could be collected and not used for production of additional housing. Some communities accept cash-in-lieu and use it to acquire existing housing and/or develop housing - themselves. Vail has experience in successfully developing housing and may wish to consider a cash-in-lieu program. 4. Where are the existing housing opportunities? This involves an assessment of potential development sites. Housing sites have been identified tMrough the Common Ground process. However, it must be determined if these sites are still acceptable to the Town Council and whether they should be used as part of a linkage program. 5. What incentives could be considered along with mitigation requirements? It was suggested that the town consider density bonuses as part of an incentive package to offset some of costs of the mitigation requirements. 6. What type of housing is needed? The nexus study generally defines those households with limited opportunities to purchase or rent units; however, the town could further define whether or not to produce rental units, for-sale housing or housing for seasonal workers. For example, the focus groups noted that housing for seasonal workers is one of its greatest needs. Although this may be the case, there was also a concern that affordable for- sale housing be produced for entry-level management workers as a way to create a stronger sense of community. Addressing these issues in light of community goals will help refine the types of units to be produced under a linkage program and their location. 7. What are the opportunities for regional cooperation? There may be opportunities to collaborate on the establishment of a commercial linkage program throughout the valley. Other potential areas for collaboration include joint development of specific properties. A suggestion made at a focus group session was to pursue a countywide property tax to generate revenues to be used to address current affordable housing needs. Clearly, this effort would require regional cooperation. NEXT STEPS: Following are the recommended next steps to be considered by the Town of Vail: 1. Initiate discussions with the Eagle County Commissioners. Eagle County has had some conversations regarding the development of a commercial linkage program. It has not proceeded with a program at this McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 4 of 5 t t Town of Vail - Commercia/ Linkage time. A coordinated effort could lessen the chances of developers "shopping" communities for those that do not have linkage requirements. In addition, the discussions could include defining opportunities for collaborating on affordable housing development that might occur throughout the valley. 2. Evaluate the potential commercial development and redevetopment that could occur in Vail. This would provide a basis for determining the potential number of new units that could be created as a result of a commercial linkage program using different levels of mitigation. This effort would assist the Town of Vail in establishing an acceptable level of commercial mitigation. 3. Address the discussion points listed in the previous section. One option for proceeding with this aspect is to establish a"working group" made up of key staff and community members who would evaluate and consider various options for implementation of a commercial linkage program. In addition, larger public forums would need to be conducted to communicate what a linkage program is and to solicit public comment. 4. Perform the nexus analysis. This involves establishing the employee generation rates that could occur as a result of new development. This information is needed to establish the legal basis for requiring a commercial linkage program. 5. Develop a program ordinance and administrative guidelines. A presentation and discussion of this information is scheduled for December 7`h. I look forward to the opportunity to meet with you and share this information and answer any questions you may have at that time. McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 5 of 5 , . _ . ' " . . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, December 1, 1999 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Clark Brittain Bill Pierce Hans Woldrich Galen Aasland (PEC) Melissa Greenauer SITE VISITS 2:00 pm 1. Ski Club Vail - 598 Vail Valley Drive 2. Buffehr Creek Park-1950 Chamonix Driver: George PUBLIC HEARtNG - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm 1. One Vail Place - Final review of sign application and proposed exterior modifications. Allison 244 Wall Street / Block 5C, Vail Village 1St Filing. Applicant: Tom Sapiro MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0 APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS: 1. That there be copper flashing above the windows. 2. That the bay window roofs be standing seam copper. 3. That the entry roofs be cedar shakes. 4. That the hardware on the doors be replaced with decorative elements. 5. That the lighting meet code. 6. That the cedar boards be vertical. 2. Groshire duplex - Final review of a new two family residence. , Dominic 5166 Black Gore Drive / Lots 4& 5, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision Applicant: A&G Development, represented by TAB Associates MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0 CONSENT APPROVED WITH 4 CONDITIONS: 1. Road shall be constructed per the plan prepared by Alpine Engineering with the addition of a 4' wide concrete pan at edge of asphalt. 2. The ditch in front of Lot 3 must be restored or pipe must remain. 41ML TO}9N1 3. A Building Permit Application shall not be submitted until the plat and all required easements have been recorded. 4. No grading shall occur in the floodplain and the floodplain shall be indicated on all plans. 3. Ski Club Vail - Conceptual review of a proposed redevelopment plan. Brent ' 598 Vail Valley Drive / Part of Tract B, Vail Village 7th Fi(ing. Applicant: Ski Club Vail, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 4. Buffehr Creek Park - Conceptual review of a proposed expansion of Buffehr Creek Park. Allison 1950 Chamonix/Lot 34, Buffehr Creek Subdivision. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 5. Vail P1aza Hotel - Preliminary recommendation to the Vail Town Council. George 100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N, & O, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.- Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson MOTION: Melissa Greenauer SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0 "Upon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the Board finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structures, the hotel's surroundings and with Vail's environment. The Board further finds that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plan & Urban Design Considerations. Therefore, the Board recommends approval of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. The Board's recommendation of approval carries with it the following conditions: - 1. That the applicant submits a final landscape plan, final off-site improvements plan, and outdoor lighting plan in accordance with the provisions prescribed in the Zoning Regulations for review and approval of the Design Review Board. 2. That the applicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and approval of the Design Review Board. 3. That the applicant submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. 4. That the applicant submits a roof-top mechanical plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof-top mechanical equipment shall be enclosed and screened from public view. Staff Approvals Lipton - Retail remodel. Ann 192 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 160, Lodge Apt. Condos/Vail Village 1St Filing. Applicant: Ronnie Lipton Gramalegli - Deck extension. Ann 2600 Kinniclcinnick Rd.#J4, Meadow Creek Condominiums/Meadow Creek Subdivision. Applicant: Greg Gramalegli Waterhouse residence - Stone pillar addition. Allison 285 Forest Rd./Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1 S` Applicant: Steve and Linda Waterhouse 2 . Town of Vaii Information Booths - Installation of customer service phones. Ann 395 S. Frontage Rd. (Lionshead)/Lot 1, block 2, Vail Lionshead 15t 241 S. Frontage Rd. (Vail Village)/Tract B&C, Vail Village 15t Applicant: Town of Vail Eversbush residence - Balcony enclosure. Ann 520 Lionshead Circle/Lot 5, Lionshead Filing 1. Applicant: Ricardo Eversbush, Sr. Webster residence - Minor subdivision (property line/right-of-way realignment). Brent 2755 SnowberryDrive/Lot 10, Block 9, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Chip Webster The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356,Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 3 NO.W THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, in accordance with Section 183 ).4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Condominiums: 1. The Board of Directors of the Association is hereby authorized to grant an easement for ingress and egress to Potential Purchaser upon satisfaction of all of the terms and conditions therefor set forth in this Resolution. 2. The grant of the subject easement for ingress and egress (the "Easement") shall be subject to the satisfaction of each and every one of the following conditions by Potential Purchaser: (a) Acquisition of the Carnie Property by Potential Purchaser; (b) Final plat approval by the Town of Vail of the Plans and Specifications for development of the Carnie Property (the "Development"); } (c) The Development shall contain no more than five (5) single family residences and shall, not eYCeed 3,500 square feet GRFA, developed and built in accordance with the site plan attached hereto; (d) A 30 foot setback from the Association's easf property line shall be . established in the Plans and Specifications and maintained by Potential Purchaser; (e) The Easement shall not be more than 25 feet in width, and the turning radius of the Easement within the Association property must be approved by the Town of Vail Fire Department and the Association Board of Directors; ( fl The written evidence of the Easement must provide that all costs of surveying, complying with Town of Vail planning requirements, all construction (including road construction), landscaping and rounding of the entrance, as well as the restoration of any Association property which is altered or damaged during construction, shall be borne solely by Potential Purchaser; (g) Potential Purchaser shall, upon execution of the formal documentation of the Easement, pay to the Association the sum of $250,000, which shall be allocated by the Association as condemnation award damages as specified in Section 33.4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club Condominiums; (h) The written documentation of the Easement shall contain, or coincide with other documentation executed by the Association and Potential Purchaser, a full settlement of the Carnie litigation with prejudice; (i) The Easement shall not be granted until such time as Potential Purchaser has obtained fee title to the Carnie Property; (j) Upon issuance of and in conjunction with the execution of a letter of intent to grant the Easement to Potential Purchaser by the Association, the Carnies must agree and stipulate to a reasonable continuance and vacation of the tria] date and 417498 1 RGAI.I 08!2:99 =>7 PA1 2 JOINT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS OF THE POTATO PATCH CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. WHEREAS, the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Association") is currently a party to certain litigation iriitiated by John A. Carnie and Joan T. Carnie (the "Carnies") requesting the condemnation of a certain easement over property owned by the Association in order to obtain access to a landlocked parcel of land located adjacent to Association property and currently owned by the. Carnies (the "Carnie Property"). ~ WHEREAS, the Association has been advised that the Carnies may desire to sell their property to MJL Development Inc. and/or Michael J. Lauterbach and/or their assigns or affiliates,(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Potential Purchaser"). WHEREAS, initial -discussions have taken place between authorized representatives of the Association and the Potential Purchaser concerning the purchase of the Carnie Propei-ty and the possible grant of an access easement over Association property by the Association to Potential Purchaser. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Association have reached a general understanding with Potential Purchaser regarding the process by which Potential Purchaser could obtain an access easement from the Association at an agreed upon location if Potential Purchaser actually obtains title to the Carnie Property. WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser obtains approval of the Town of Vail (and all other governmental entities with jurisdiction over the subject property) for Potential Purchaser's development plans and specifications (the "Plans and Specifications") with respect to the Carnie Property, the prospects of a transfer of title to the Carnie Property to the Potential Purchaser are greatly increased. WHEREAS, in order to obtain approval of the Plans and Specifications for the development of the Carnie Property, Potential Purchaser has advised the Association that Potential Purchaser requires a letter of intent from the Association agreeing to grant to Potential Purchaser an easement for ingress and egress over Association property to the Carnie Property at the location specified in the Plans and Specifications. WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser is able to acquire the Carnie Property and obtain from the Association the easement for ingress and egress more particularly described herein, the litigation filed by the Carnies with respect thereto could be dismissed and the Association could be released from the obligation to defend such action. WHEREAS, on June 4, 1999 the Board of Directors of the Association adopted a resolution (by a vote of six to two) recommendinc, that the Board of Directors bring to the owners and members of the Association at the annual meeting; a resolution authoriziilg the Association to pursue the matters more particularly described herein. 417499 1 RCiALT 08i1199^_ 57 PAI Locati'on a ~ 3t I I TRACf A BlDqC1 9U6 30 ~b ~ ~ nns VAIL POTATO PATC ~ 34 POiATO P T67 TWYNHOAEB - 33 766 6 - ~O ,7" 2 10 - ~7/ ; 5 t' Ir7~ g-01 X/ m - A ~ rnwcr o T TO PATCH DR S 3 75B hr~ F~c~,~~ AT ATC ,s+ • L~ IL 2 7sa a 7 i S 73E - 748 POTATC~~1 rtj, ~ ...ti • 740 7Y2 Z ,45 ~gTAURANT ~ '!Y . . a7 ~ 9 Buc ~ r Gi 9~ trorrAropnrcN 9PN097DNF CWBWNOOMIMUM PMK RE08ANUeTONEEIEAENTARY f (1 n1 i` ~ ~ ~ ;i`4HPN :E{?;~;j~;i;: 5et AROOKTitEE LJ 8B0 L~ ae~~ TRACT C a10 ] AS N a+wse ci rHASE o Pi403E1 TR „s 'aa °65 e33 aa+ ~HASE 3 8Q6 UNPLATTFO l ~ B93 ~ 811N VNL B97 ~ 891 1@0 osroNe ciR TR1Cf ~ ~n g PYw~ V p 8~ W B ' 880 . a r` e~ 92' o ~ 7 " VAIL LIONSHEAD 817 N 998 ~ FILING 4 ~ 97 0 LA sMosror€ ~ 9 FILI G 9 TOTLOT Ta"`T W ea~ ""Rb"°`°T ANDSTONE ~ 70 ~ aeA + 134 878 RU VAI.GLO ~ . Hi3 LANDMARK ' ~ ~ 674 ~ L~ ~ ~ 7~ 4CT 0 7ppC{ q i '2 'm I 870 7 n 016 ~ 9~ ~ N Subject Property E S . u ~y TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road • • , Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ 970-479-2100 . FAX 970-479-2157 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TM The parcel shown on the map on the back side of this page, zoned Residential Cluster (allows up to 6 dwelling units per acre), is currently under review for a proposed singie- family residential development of 5 dwelling units. The project is currently scheduled for review by the Design Review Board on August 18, 1999, ho.wever this date could - , change. This notice is being provided to you as a courtesy as it is not required by the Town Code. ` If you have any questions regarding the project or want to review the application you may do so at the Community Development Department located at 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657. You may also contact the Project Planner for this application, Dominic Mauriello, at 970- 479-2148. The Design Review Board agenda will be available on our website 24 hours prior to the. meeting - vail.net/tov. RECYCLED PAPER . , VAIL TOWN COUNCIL - MINUTES TUESDAY, November 2, 1999 7:00 P.M. The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held in the Town Council Chambers on - Tuesday, November 2, 1999. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Rob Ford, Mayor Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro-Tem Kevin Foley Sybill Navas Michael Jewett Bob Armour Mike Amett STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Tom Moofiead, Town Attomey The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Josef Staufer, past owner of Vail Village Inn, expressed his appreciation to outgoing Mayor Rob Ford and the entire town Council for their willingness to address some tough issues during their term in office. The second item on the agenda was the consent agenda: A. Approve the Minutes from the meetings of October 5`h and 1 gtn 1999. B. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance to Designate Five Properties in the Town of Vail as Open Space as per Section 13.11 of the Town of Vail Charter (see Exhibit A). C. Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of Fee Title to the Following Land Owned by the Town of Vail and Located on Rockledge Road, More Fully Described as Follows: That portion of Lots 2, 3A and 36 (Resubdivision of Lot 3, Block 7), 4, 7, 8A, 9A, 10A and10B (Resubdivision of Lot 10, Block 7), and 136 (Resubdivision of Lot 13, Block 7), Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, lying South of the North Line of Lot 2 of the Raether Minor Subdivision (formerly Govemment Lot 3), and North of the North boundary of Rockledge Road and/or North of the North boundary of Tract A East of the East end of Rockledge Road, as described in the Final Plat of A Replat of a Portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, and Lot 2 of Raether Minor Subdivision, Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated September 7, 1999, (as that plat may be modified with the consent of the Town of Vail), together with all interests of the Town of Vail in all easements and other appurtenances associated with said Purchased Property as shown on said Final Plat. In addition, pursuant the Agreement Creating Restrictive Covenants, attached as Exhibit B, the Town of Vail agrees to create restrictive covenants, which shall be 1 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999 . u covenants running with the land, for the benefit of the owners of Lots 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 7, 8A, 9A, 10A, 108 and 13B, which Restrictive Covenants shall be on the following described real estate in the Town of Vail, County of Eagle and State of Colorado, to wit: Tract A, Final Plat of A Replat of a Portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, and Lot 2 of Raether Minor Subdivision, Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated September 7, 1999, (as that plat may be modified with the consent of the Town of Vail) (See attached Exhibit A- Final Plat of A Replat of a Portion of Block 7, Vail Village First . Filing, and Lot 2 of Raether Minor Subdivision, Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated September 7, 1999.) Council member Armour made a motion to approve the consent agenda, and Council member Navas seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The third item on the agenda was second reading of Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1999, an Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of Fee Title to the Following Land Owned by the Town of Vail and Located on Ptarmigan Road and Vacating a Portion of Ptarmigan Road, More Fully Described as Follows: That portion of Lots 1-6, Block 5, Vail Village Seventh Filing, hereinafter refeRed to as the "Original Lots", lying South of the North line of Govemment Lot 3, and North of Ptarmigan Road, hereinafter referred to as the "Purchased Property", which Purchased Property is combined with Lots 1-6, Block 5, Vail Village Seventh Filing (according to the original plat), as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 2, as described in the Final Plat of Replat of Lots 1-6 Block 5 of Vail Village Seventh Filing; Replat of Lot 4 Vail Village Tenth Filing, and Govemment Lot 3, situated in Sections 8 and 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson- Langford Corporation and dated September 1, 1999 (as that plat may be modified with the consent of the Town of Vail); and That'portion of Govemment Lot 3 which is situated on the east lot line of Lot 4, Vail Village Tenth Filing, (which lot is hereinafter referred to as the "Original Lot 4'), and. lying East of the West line of Govemment Lot 3, West of the East line of Govemment Lot 4, and North of Comers 3 and 4 of Govemment Lot 3, containing 5,074.5 square feet more or less, which portion is hereinafter referred to as the "Purchased Property- 1", which Original Lot 4 and Purchased Property-1 are combined as Lot 4, Block 1, as described in the Final Plat of Replat of Lots 1-6 Block 5 of Vail Village Seventh Filing; Replat of Lot 4 Vail Village Tenth Filing, and Govemment Lot 3, situated in Sections 8 and 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated September 1, 1999, (as that plat may be modified with the consent of the Town of Vail). . That portion of Ptarmigan Road, according to the plat of Vail Village Seventh Filing, situated in the NW'/4 NW'/4 of Section 9, Township 5 South Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Eagle, State of Colorado; being more particularly described as follows: 2 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999 , Beginning at the point on the North line of Govemment Lot 3 of said Section 9, whence the B.L. M. Cadastral Survey brass cap for the South-North one-sixty fourth comer on the West line of said Section 9 bears North 89°23'29" West, a distance of 65.46 feet; Thence North 00°36'31" East, a distance of 24.97 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of Ptarmigan Road, being on a 215.00 foot radius curve concave to the northeast; Thence along said right-of-way line, 58.53 feet southeasteriy along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 15°35'49", with a chord bearing South 64°02'57" East, a distance of 58.35 feet to the North line of said Govemment Lot 3; Thence North 89°23'29" West, a distance of 52.73 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.013 Acres, more or less. In addition, the Town of Vail will establish and transfer to the Eagle Valley Land Trust a conservation easement, on the terms and conditions set forth in the Deed of Conservation Easement, attached as Exhibit B, which Conservation Easement shall be on the following described real estate in the Town of Vail, County of Eagle, and State of Colorado, to wit: (1) Tract "A", a portion of Govemment Lot 3, Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian, which contains 9,333 square feet; and (2) Govemment Lot 4, Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian which contains approximately 4.252 acres (See attached Exhibit A- Final Plat of Replat of Lots 1-6 Block 5 of Vail Village Seventh Filing; Replat of Lot 4 Vail Village Tenth Filing, and Govemment Lot 3, situated in Sections 8 and 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated September 1, 1999.) Councilmember Armour excused himself from voting on this item, stating that one of his ski school clients was involved in the proposed purchase. Tom Moorhead said in the early 1990s the Vail Town Council directed staff to begin working with the Forest Service to address private and public encroachments on Forest System lands and to identify ways to discourage private exchanges arQUnd the Town of Vail. In 1994 the community completed the Vail Comprehensive Open Space Plan which identified properties that should be considered for land exchange. In June, 1995, the Town of Vail and the United States Forest Service signed and agreement to initiate a land exchange. The land exchange involved three parcels of Town of Vail land totaling 76 acres and 11 parcels of United States Forest Service land totaling 62.2 acres. This exchange essentially removed the Forest Service lands from within the Town of Vail by acquiring or de-annexing U.S. Forest lands. The transfer of the property from the Town of Vail to the Forest Service was approved in Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1997. The Town has been negotiating in good faith with the residents on Ptarmigan Road to convey land where residents now have encroachments and to create a buffer between Ptarmigan and the forest on what was United States Forest Service lands and now are Town of Vail owned lands. The value of this land has been calculated on a per square foot basis. The Town of Vail will realize $1.2 million for the sale of property on Ptarmigan Road. It is hoped that it will reduce the likelihood of private exchanges of Forest Service lands in and around the Town of Vail. The Town continues to maintain a strong posture in regard to opposing private land exchanges that could allow additional development around the Town of Vail. 3 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999 i This ordinance has changed since first reading to include an additional 0.013 acres which is presently included within the Ptarmigan Road right-of-way. It will be conveyed to the Cannans in addition to other property from the LOAA and their participation in the land to be preserved as open space. It provides a more standard shape to the lot. The conveyance will be for the same price per square foot as they are paying for the balance of land being conveyed. Council member Amett made a motion to approve on second reading, Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1999, and Council member Kurz seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-1, Council member Foley opposing, Council member Armour abstaining. Council member Foley stated he did not feel the Town was getting fair market value for this property. The fourth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 15, Series of 1999, a Resolution Approving the Town of Vail/Eagle County Intergovemmental Agreement to Develop a Sixteen Acre Affordable Housing Project Located on the Berry Creek 5th property. Tom Moorhead said a contract for Eagle County to purchase the Beny Creek 5th property from the Eagle Gounty Recreation Authority is contingent upon entering into an Intergovemmental Agreement for the development of the affordable housing component. The Intergovemmental Agreement, which is subject to formal approval by passage of this resolution, provides that the County and the Town will be 50/50 partners. The Town of Vail will be obliged to pay 50% of the development costs and in retum will be an equal partner that is entitled to designate the rules for the sale or rental of 50% of the units. The County Commissioners have approved this Intergovemmental Agreement. Russell Forrest, Nina Timm, and Tom Moorhead, on behalf of the Town, met with Jack Ingstad, David Carter, and Jim Fritze, on behalf of Eagle County, and have taken the initial steps to move _ forward with this project. Michael Cacioppo questioned the wording in the last paragraph of the resolution. After some discussion, Council member Amett made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 15, Series of 1999 and Council member Foley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The fifth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Town Manager McLaurin addressed the Council, stating that he was pleased to have worked with this Council and wished them well. Council member Armour stated that this was his last meeting and thanked Bob McLaurin, Pam Brandmeyer, Tom Moorhead, Russ Forrest and the Town staff, as well as his fellow colleagues for their time and effort. He also thanked his wife, Mary Lou, for her patience. As there was no further business, a motion was made by Council member Armour to adjoum the meeting and Council member Amett seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. 4 Vail Tovm Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999 The meeting was adjoumed at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ludwig Kurz Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson Town Clerk (minutes taken by Mary Caster) 5 Vail Tovm Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999 } ~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL - MINUTES TUESDAY, November 16, 1999 7:00 P.M. . The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held in the Town Council Chambers on Tuesday, November 16, 1999. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-Tem : Rod Slifer • Chuck Ogilby Kevin Foley Greg Moffet Diana Donovan STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Paul,Rondeau, a local resident, said he had a couple of suggestions to make about the process of how things were done at Council meetings. The first was to have informal seating at the Council work sessions and have people seated at tables adjacent to the Council so people would not have to stand at the podium. The second topic he wanted to address was that he wanted to get feedback from Council on his or anyone other citizen's suggestions or complaints that are brought up at the Council meetings, whether it's on the spot feedback or discussed at a later Council meeting. Council member Greg Moffet said Paul's ideas were good ideas. Mayor Ludwig Kurz said they are already in the process of changing some things and said reiterated that Paul's ideas were good ones. Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager, said the staff already has tables ready to put in place for this type of seating arrangement. Bob McLaurin, Town Manager, informed everyone that public comments are placed on a Council Follow-Up form for responses as well. The second item on the agenda was a Wayfinding Conceptual and Design Review. Suzanne Silverthorn, Community Relations Officer, gave a brief overview of the Wayfinding Program and asked for further direction from Council. The wayfinding program builds upon the sign program for vehicles and pedestrians that was developed 10 years ago at the time of the 1989 World Championships. The Council gave staff direction this past summer to work with a consultant on an evaluation process. With input from the several entities involved, they have come up with a Wayfinding Program for Vail. She introduced Jeff Corbin, President of Corbin Design of Traverse City, Michigan. 1 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 ~ Jeff Corbin gave a slide presentation to Council and the public. During the presentation he discussed various aspects of the process. He stated that there were quite a few changes since 1989, information is easier to get and signage erosion has occurred. He said people weren't necessarily looking for specific places within the town but were looking for larger sections of Vail and how they relate to one another, such as Vail Village and Lionshead. The signage and concepts in 1989 were sound and what they are proposing now, builds on what the town has now. Jeff said there were nine ideas to improve and build upon. The program would establish six zones within Vail; East Vail, Golden Peak, Vail Village, Lionshead Village, Cascade Village and West Vail, with a color coded mapping and sign identification system that would tie in the I-70 corridor, the frontage roads and roundabouts, pedestrian areas, recreation paths and neighborhood streets. He said he has met with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) regarding changing signage on I-70 to coordinate with signs in town. This would allow for introduction of the symbols, signage and color by zones used in town on signage along I-70. This program also extends the landscaping and stone walls approximately 150 feet off the exit ramps, with additional signage. There could also be signs on the north side of the bridge stating whether or not the parking structures are open and/or full. There could also be the use of visitor parking signs to direct people to the parking structures. He reviewed the parking structure signage, maps of the Village, as well as discussing possible space on maps at the parking structures for events that are happening during the year. He said the street signage needs updating and have more continuity throughout Vail, the need to have signage with Spanish and German on them, as well as walking time in kilometers. Jeff said he would answer any questions the Council may have about the Wayfinding Program. He complimented the town on the Wayfinding Committee that Vail has in place. Mayor Ludwig Kurz thanked Jeff for his overview. Council member Sybill Navas thanked Jeff for the work he has done and said there is a strong need for this program. Mayor Ludwig Kurz asked about the I-70 signage. Would the entry into Vail from the East be the same as coming into Vail from the West. He and asked why kilometers would be used instead of miles. Jeff said the entryways would be similar. He stated Vail could use miles, minutes, kilometers, feet or whatever they thought was appropriate. He stated another community has used kilometers and they have had success with it. Measurement in kilometers is shorter than miles. The committee is open on what type of ineasurement to use. Mayor Ludwig Kurz asked if they are looking at a phased program, and where is the best place to start, from Jeffs experience. Jeff said working on the pedestrian signage from the Village out would be the first priority, signs in the roundabouts, and the parking structure signage as Phase I. 2 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 ; Bob McLaurin, Town Manager said the discussion on what would be Phase I is still in debate at the committee level right now and the committee will come back to Council with a priority list. He said this is a two to five year project. Council member Greg Moffet asked if the funding would come out of the general fund. Bob McLaurin said it would come out of capital projects funding. Council member Rod Slifer complimented the committee and Jeff for their work. He said this has been an ongoing issue for many years and said the first phase needs to include the interstate signs and exit signs. Bob McLaurin said the interstate signs are subject to CDOT approvals, which may take more time to do. JefF said everything that can be done first can be done during the winter, or immediately. Mayor Ludwig Kurz asked if the signs can be made in the town shops instead of going elsewhere. Jeff said the town staff could do many of the signs, however, 320 signs are a lot for the staff to manage. Bob McLaurin said the technology available today would make the signs easier to make and to maintain. Council member Chuck Ogilby asked some of the colors that made it harder to read the signs. Jeff said they would have to experiment to get the right color. Council member Kevin Foley asked if they would be naming the paths and trails and if the signs would be on light posts. Jeff said yes that is what is being proposed, however the signs would not be on the light posts, but they would have their own post. Council member Kevin Foley asked if there was a cost to the businesses. Bob McLaurin said they are looking at business opportunities with CDOT and Vail Resorts to help fund this program. Further discussion ensued regarding maps, costs to businesses, or if the town would pick up the cost for the maps. Mayor Ludwig Kurz echoed Rod's comments that this would help visitors get around town but will also add freshness and color to the area. He said in terms of the cost of the program, it will not be inexpensive to do but will help get guests around the town. He feels this is not an inappropriate goal for the town to achieve. . 3 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 Council member Diana asked if the signs are solar and will they reflect the light. A statement of being in Vail should be made and the signs should be at both entrances of Vail. She is concerned some of the signs looked large, particularly the transportation center sign. She said the overall program was an interesting concept. Jeff said the signs were not solar, they are solid and the same on both sides. Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association (EVHOA) said he had : worked on the.Town of Vail sign program years ago. He complimented the committee and the • consultant on the comprehensiveness of the proposal. He would like to move forward on the regulatory signs on the no- skier drop off signs immediately. He liked the idea of doing as much of the signs in-house as possible. He feels that the French language should also be added to the signs. Jim also stated that on regional news, CDOT is developing a system-wide camera system so people can see the signs and get additional mileage on advertising. He thanked Suzanne Silverthorn; Sybill Navas and the rest of the committee for letting him get his two-cents in from the beginning of the process. Paul Rondeau, a local resident said the West Vail area is a real problem. He stated there is confusion of which side of the interstate people needed to be on. Jeff said signage on the West Vail roundabouts would clarify what neighborhoods are on each side of the highway and also the possibility of changing the Frontage Road name to a more complimentary name on each side would help. Paul said the blue color may be a problem and they may need to add a seventh color so the blue in regulatory signs could stand-alone. Council member Sybill Navas said the Design Review Board (DRB) also had a problem with some of the color choices. Jeff said there is a need to use colors that work with CDOT and signage. Mayor Ludwig Kurz as Suzanne Silverthorn what authorization was needed from Council to move forward. Suzanne said they wanted authorization to allow staff to return in two weeks with an implementation schedule for Phase I, and cost estimates. Bob McLaurin said the 2000 capital budge provides $250,000 for the recommended improvements. He also said he would seek community partners to help pay for the program. He also stated the committee would come back in a couple of weeks with recommendations, and what the federal and state government entities feedback. Mayor Ludwig Kurz said there is strong support to keep moving forward with this process. 4 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 . The third item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999, an Ordinance Providing for the Levy Assessment and Collection of Town Ad Valorem Property Taxes Due for the 1999 Tax Year and Payable in the 1999 Fiscal Year. Steve Thompson, Finance Director, stated this ordinance provides for the proposed mill levy assessment and collection of property taxes for the 2000 fiscal year. The Town is allowed to increase its property tax revenue by the sum of the percentage increase in net new construction of .908% plus the Denver Boulder CPI for 1999 of 2.9% for a total of 3.808% or $76,519. Council member Sybill Navas made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 33, Series of Series 1999 on first reading and Council member Kevin Foley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The fourth item on the agenda were the Contracts for Community Facilities Planning. Russell Forrest, Community Development Director, said a productive meeting was held with the community facilities committee. They are requesting authorization from Council to enter into a contract with Economic Research Associates for a market analysis on the various uses proposed for the Hub site in Lionshead. He also asked for authorization to enter into a contract with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop for site designing of the proposed community uses on the lower bench of Donovan Park. He presented an overview of what the next steps would be at the Hub Site. Dominic Mauriello, Chief Planner, reviewed the Donovan Park project and the types of possible uses for the site. He said there was a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued and they received four proposals and interviewed three teams. He reiterated the request for authorization to move forward with a contract with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop as the design development team. Russ said the market analysis needs to be updated from the early 1990's, and it is a critical next step. He explained that the market analysis would reveal what the economic impacts and operational costs would be and explain what would be viable. He said there were four or five teams that responded but they coufd not respond fast enough. He stated Economic Research Associates (ERA) is a leader in the business. He stated ERA is working with Eagle County and they are on budget with Eagle County. He stated the next steps are to begin fund raising, finish . the market analysis by February, and the design process completed by April or May. Council member Diana Donovan said she has many concerns. She said at the last public meeting she thought more uses were to be on the Hub Site and not on Donovan Park. She said more of the uses should be moved onto the Hub Site. She said the gymnastics facilities should be at the Hub Site and should not be in a neighborhood. She was also concerned about the huge rush to get through this process quickly. She wants long-range thinking to keep Donovan Park open space. She said the kind of density proposed would destroy the park. Russ said communication between the two projects is essential and communication between the two projects would provide for the ability to review the uses and move them from one site to another. Parking and access to Donovan Park are issues. He reiterated there will be ongoing communication befinreen the project sites. 5 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 , Bob McLaurin said a site plan would be provided. Russ said a couple of site plans would be provided. He said the design teams would be honest and inform the Council and community of what the possible community facilities could be handled at each of the sites. Further discussion ensued. Council member Rod Slifer said he served on the community facilities committee and disagrees with Diana's comments. He said both sites need to be reviewed at the same time. He said not all the facilities can be placed on the Hub Site. He stated the process Russ is proposing will - address the concems that Diana has about the Donovan Park site and supported the move to go ahead. Council member Sybill Navas agreed with Rod. She said Donovan Park is being reviewed to find out what could fit, and the architect is intemationally known for environmentally sound decisions on what can be done various sites. She stated the Community Facilities team worked hard on trying to find out what needed to go on the sites and there is room for debate on the possible uses on both sites. There are community-driven uses that could be placed on Donovan Park and there are separate Hub Site uses for economy-driven uses with guests. She said the scale of uses in Donovan Park could be scaled down. There is not a clearly finished project at Donovan Park or the Hub Site. She would like to see this financed through partnerships with the Vail Recreation District, Real Estate Transfer Tax funds, and private funding, without going to a bond election. Council member Greg Moffet stated that as the only resident of the Donovan Park neighborhood, he felt this area has been ignored. He said if basic services are being ignored, families will leave town. He said the Council needs to get off the dime on this and move forward. Council member Kevin Foley said he agreed that Diana's concems were valid. He said beds, food, and other activities need to be near the gymnastics facility. He doesn't want the ABC School and Learning Tree School moved to Donovan Park with other facilities. He feels more of the facilities should be at the Hub Site. Council member Chuck Ogilby said the Mountain Bell site should be used for housing. He also stated the swimming pool and gymnastics center and schools could possibly be placed on the Mountain Bell site. He said the committee should also look at the hospital site for a swimming pool. He said guests might have a difficult time accessing the Donovan Park site. Mayor Ludwig Kurz said, in general terms, he agreed with Rod and Sybill's comments. He stated the Council needs to get the professionals involved to find out what facilities can be placed on Donovan Park and the Hub Site. He said to arbitrarily decide what is too much or too little on the sites now is shorting ourselves because they don't have the expertise. He said it was time to let the professionals do the market research, site planning and compatible use evaluations and bring them to Council. He is in favor of moving forward with the design and planning stage with the professionals. , 6 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 Council member Sybill Navas said that before Council starts redesigning the entire community facilities plan, they should consider all the work the team has worked on for three years with a great deal of public input. She said there wifl still be opportunities to add to this program. She said it would be a terrible mistake to have seven people make a decision like this without community input. Mayor Ludwig Kurz said Council should continue to move forward and get community input. Council member Diana Donovan said she is not against the concept. She wants to make sure : whatever doesn't work on Donovan Park doesn't get placed on Donovan Park. She said there were so many things on the list for ponovan Park that shouldn't be on the list. She stated people on the community facilities team were special interest people and didn't represent the community. She said not everything on the list for ponovan Park falls under the funding by Real Estate Transfer Tax funds. Russ said there will be an opportunity to review, in February, what Donovan Park can and cannot support and everyone will have a better understanding of what the Hub Site can support. Russ said the community didn't want to over-build the Hub Site with all the facilities. He said there is a component in the contract for cross-communication and clear checkpoints to evaluate the uses on both sites. The contract is in phases. The Hub Site is in the conceptual phase only and Donovan Park is in the development review/design phase process. Council member Kevin Foiey said he echoes Diana's comments, he isn't against the process, he wants to make sure people are heard and get what they feel works on each site. Council member Rod Slifer said to he is committed to work with each of the impacted neighborhoods during the process. Jim Lamont, representing EVHOA, said he credits this Council for concerns expressed about the neighborhoods. He said the Counci{ and community needed to stay open to options that are not available now. He said the train has left the station and it should keep going. He is sympathetic to Greg Moffet's comments that this neighborhood has been neglected but Vail Village and Lionshead feel neglected too. He said they should discuss improvement plans for Vail Village and Lionshead and how can they can strategize various components to provide funding for some of these projects at their retreat. He said these are complex issues and challenges, and the how we pay for it is as critical as what facilities are placed on what site. Council member Chuck Ogilby asked if it was possible to consider the swimming and gymnastics centers separate from other components of the design. Council member Sybill Navas said they might not be looking at just one building. Diane Johnson, representing the Vail Recreation District (VRD) stated the hospital was a good opportunity for a swimming pool and rehabilitation space. The VRD has all it departments spread throughout Vail. She said they are the only recreation district that does it this way. She said the reality is that the customer is better served if programs are clustered. She said Donovan Park could provide parking that would be more convenient for users. The Lionshead Parking Structure costs money. She said she is a community facilities committee member and 7 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 . people on the committee are moving forward. She said they are providing honest and open suggestians for facilities and nothing has. been preconceived. Tom Steinberg, a local resident, said he is recommending ERA and felt they did an excellent job. Mayor Ludwig Ku2 asked Russ what specifically the staff was looking for from Council. Russ said looking for approval to move forward on entering into a contract with Economic Research Associates for a market analysis on the various uses proposed for the Hub site in Lionshead and authorization to enter into a contract with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop for site designing of the proposed community uses on the lower bench of Donovan Park. Council member Greg Moffet made a motion to enter into two contacts; 1) a contract with Economic Research Associates for a market analysis on the various uses proposed for the Hub site in Lionshead and Z) a contract with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop for site designing of the proposed community uses on the lower bench of Donovan Park, the motion was seconded by Council member Sybill Navas. Council member Diana Donovan asked if the motion could be split or if the contracts could be reviewed by members of Council before they were signed. Bob McLaurin said nothing can be signed off with out express approval and sign off of Council. Further discussion ensued. Council member Rod Slifer said he doesn't want to review the contracts. Council member Kevin Foley wants to keep the cost inside the budget. Council member Sybill Navas said the consultants are on a public process schedule that is tight and she doesn't want to spend time to review the contracts because it would delay the time frame of the projects. A vote was taken. And the motion passed unanimousty 7-0. The fifth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Bob McLaurin said he had nothing further to report. He invited the Council to lunch with Sam Mamet, from the Colorado Municipal League on Friday at Up the Creek. Council member Kevin Foley reminded everyone there was unfinished business to discuss from the work session. He said the discussion was whether or not the town should purchase a two bedroom West Vail unit for employee housing. Council member Kevin Foley made a motion to enter into a contract to purchase the Vail Das Schone unit for $215,000 and Council member Sybill Navas seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. 8 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 2 , Ludwig said they had a productive work session. The Town Council will be the governing board for the new marketing district at this time and there will also be a seven-member advisory board at the present time. As there was no further business, a motion was made by Council member Kevin Foley to adjourn the meeting and Council member Rod Slifer seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ludwig Kurz Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson Town Clerk 9 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 34 SERIES OF 1999 AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET ADNSTMENTS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, AND HEALTH INSURANCE FUND OF THE 1999 BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID APPROPRIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 1999 which could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1998, adopting the 1999 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not budgeted for previously; and, WHEREAS, the Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make certain supplemental appropriations and budget adjustments as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO that: 1. Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations and budget adjustments for the 1999 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure of said appropriations as follows: FUND AMOUNT , General Fund $ 63,461 Health Insurance Fund 120,000 Capital Projects Fund 85.000 Total $268,461 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this. ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, , nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer sha11 not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 7" day of December, 1999, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 21 S` day of December, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST:. Lorelei Donaidson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 21 S` day of December, 1999. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ci;brinance99.28 . TOWN OF VAIL SCHEDULE OF REQUIRED 1999 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS Fuial Supplemental Appropriadon ADDTTIONAL REVENUE FUND (REDUCED) ADJUSTMENTS EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT 1999 INCREASE EXPENDITURE OR PROJECT EXPENDITURES DECREASE GENERAL FUND: Revenues: Grant Revenue 28,860 CDOT Pass through grant Library Grant Revenue 3,831 Revenue from libtary grants Miscellaneous Revenue 3,850 Revenue from friends of the library book sale Miscellaneous Revenue 1,420 TIPS books sold to vendors Grant Revenue 16,110 COPS more grant Library: Grant Expenditures 3,831 Expenditure of grant proceeds Miscellaneous - Capital Outlay 3,850 Pass through ofbook sale to friends of the library Police: Capital Outlay - Hardware 17,500 Books and Subscriptions 1,420 Reimburseinent from vendor for TIP's books Public Works: Professional Fees 28,860 Reunbursement CDOT grant Contributions Vail Community TV 5,000 Franchise revenue was previously increased but expense was not. We pay 40% of franchise fee to vail community TV SUBTOTAL - GENERAL FUND 63,461 54,071 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND: Revenues: Sale of Fixed Assets 1,969,521 Sale of Berry Creek Sth parcel Expenditures: Library Work Area Remodel 4,000 Additional cost for project Capital Outlay - Ice Arena 15,000 To cover fire damage to transformer at the ice arena Software - Upgrade Permits Software 66,000 Present system is a DOS based system and will not work with new operating system. SUBTOTAL - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 85,000 1,969,521 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND: Revenues: Employer Contributions 120,000 Will use salary and benefit savings to fund increased clauns Expenditures: Health Claims 120,000 Health claims are expected to exceed budget SUBTOTAL - HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 120,000 120,000 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 268,461 2,143,592 SUPPSUM.WK4 1 12/03/99 MEMORANDUM T0: , Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: December 7, 1999 SUBJECT: A rezoning for property zoned Natural Area Preservation and owned by the United States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District, for property located at Rockledge Road/ A replat of a portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing and Lot 2 of Raether minor subdivision affecting lots 2, 4, 7, 8A and 9A, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing; Lots 3A and 3B, Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 10A, Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 13B Resubdivision of Lot 13 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; and Government Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. and , A rezoning for property zoned Natural Area Preservation and owned by the United States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District, for property located at Ptarmigan Road/ Lots 1 through 6, Block 5, Vail Village Seventh Filing, replat of Lot 4, Vail Village Tenth Filing and Government Lot 3; all in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Dominic Mauriello/Tom Moorhead 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST AND BACKGROUND The Town of Vail is applying for zoning on property which was previously zoned Natural Area Preservation located along Rockledge Road and Ptarmigan Road. This property was obtained by the Town of Vail under the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement (LOAA) with the United States Forest Service. The Forest Service did not recognize the Town's zoning on this property. A portion of the land acquired is now proposed to be rezoned Primary/Secondary Residential in order to accommodate those residential improvements already located on the land. The Town is working with adjacent property owners under contract to purchase this land from the Town. The PEC has already approved the plats~for this area, however, they have not be recorded. The plats will be recorded at the time of closing the sale to the adjacent property owners. On July 7, 1998 and again on. October 26, 1998 the Planning and Environmental Commission 1 - T'019NO*VAIL recommended approval of proposed rezoning. The rezoning was not presented to the Town Council at that time as the negotiations with adjacent property owners and potential purchaser.s was continuing and agreements had not been reached. The PEC zoning recommendation remains valid on the proposal. II. ROLES OF REVIEWING BOARDS Planninq and Environmental Commission: . ACTION: THE PEC IS ADVISORY TO THE TOWN COUNCIL ON THE ZONING. The PEC shall review the proposal and make a recommendation to the Town Council on the compatibility of the proposed zoning with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the community. Town Council: ACTIQN: THE TOWN COUNCIL IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF A ZONING REQUEST. The Town Council shall review and approve the proposal based on the compatibility of the proposed zoning with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the community. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the zoning requests subject #o the following finding: That the proposed zone districts are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area. IV. BACKGROUfVD This proposed resubdivision and zoning change is a one of the final steps in a Land Exchange with the US Forest Service and the Town of Vail. The basic purpose of the exchange is to remove Forest System lands from within the Town boundary and to acquire Forest System Lands that have public or private improvements located thereon. One of the critical reasons why the Forest Service was interested in the Exchange was to address private and public encroachments on US Forest Service Lands. Lands owned by the Forest Service on Rockledge Road and Ptarmigan Road were the major, issues of concern regarding encroachments. In the early 90's, the Vail Town Council directed staff to begin working with the Forest Service to address encroachments on Forest System lands and to identify ways to discouragelprivate exchanges around the Town of Vail. On Rockledge Road residents requested that the Town initiate an exchange to address encroachments on Forest System lands. Residents on Ptarmigan were very interested in protecting a 4.25 acre parcel on the South Side of Ptarmigan , Rd. In 1994, the community completed the Vail Comprehensive Open Space Plan which identified properties that should be considered for a land exchange. In June, 1995 the Town of- Vail and the IJ.S. Forest Service signed an agreement to initiate a land exchange. The original 2 I proposai for the land exchange involved 4 parcels of TOV land totaling 77 acres and 11 parcels ~ of USFS lands totaling 110 acres. The exchange removes Forest Service lands from within the Town of Vail and involves a number of de-annexation actions to remove areas the Town of Vail did not acquire. In December of 1997, the Town and Forest Service exchanged titles to the involved parcels of land and the Town now owns the lands identified in exhibits attached located on Rockledge and Ptarmigan Rd. Throughout the land exchange the Town has worked with property owners on ~ Ptarmigan and Rockledge to develop a means for residents to acquire the land where they have physical improvements on Forest Service lands. This subdivision is now occurring simultaneously with the zoning application. Lands conveyed to private property owners will be deed restricted so that development can not occur on any land the Town acquired from the Forest Service and such restriction is noted on the plat as well. However, the zoning on the property that will be conveyed to adjacent property owners needs to have the same zoning as the lot to take advantage of , additional GRFA and site coverage, This will involve zoning that land which will be conveyed to adjacent property owners to the Primary/Secondary District. Tract A on both plats and the parcel on the south side of Ptarmigan Road will, however, remain zoned to Natural Area Preservation District since the intention with these parcels has always been to be maintained as open space. V. CRITERIA The PEC shall make the following findings before granting approval of a zone change request: 1) Is the existing zoning suitable with the existing land use on the site and adjacent land uses? The purpose of this major subdivision and rezoning is to address private encroachments on what is now Town of Vail property. The rezoning will be consistent with the zoning directly adjacent to the exchange properties on Rockledge Road and Ptarmigan Road. 2) Is the amendment preventing a convenient workable relationship with land uses . consistent with municipal objectives. The amendment will facilitate legal access to both Rockledge and Ptarmigan roads. ~ Completing this exchange and conveying the encroached upon lands to the adjacent property owners fulfills long stated objectives identified in the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement, the Land Use Plan, and the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan. 3) Does the rezoning provide for the growth of an orderly viable community? Addressing long standing private encroachments on public property helps to support a viable orderly community by not having private residential structures exist without legal access and clouded titles. 4) Is the change consistent with the Land Use Plan? Section 1.9 of the Land Use Plan on page 7 states tliat National Forest land which is exchanged sold or otherwise falls into private ownership should remain as open space and not be zoned for private development. This reference refers to private exchanges. The exchange between the Forest Service and the Town was a public exchange to protect open space that may have been disposed off by the USFS. The 4.25 acres of open space acquired from the Forest Service on the south side of Ptarmigan Road will be 3 protected by a conservation easement and zoning. The land conveyed to individual home owners will also be deed restricted and will not allow development on lands acquired from the Forest Service. This zoning request will facilitate the resolution of long standing encroachments of private roads, structures, and iandscaping on public property. On page 10 of the Land Use Plan, it acknowledges that the Town and the USFS need to work together to address lands that were identified for possible disposal. Lands on Ptarmigan Road and_Rockledge Road were designated as such because of the privafe and public encroachments on these properties. This subdivision and rezoning will help facilitate the resolution of these encroachment"s. F:\EVERYONE\COUNCI L\MEMOS\99\TOVREDI3.DOC 4 Viicnity Map Rockledge ~Road Rezoning, Wt,l MtAUUW UK ~ 252 p MOUDAY ~ \ 142 \ ~ 5 6 122 ~ B ~ 100 \ 212 182 181 . f \ 62 13 > M / VAR Fl 44 aEPr 56 H 353 B 42 SONNEWLLF ~ ~ TRACT B 332 YILIA 15T ~ 2 313 41 ~8 COHTIN4 ~ r &1NK ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 37 18 A . 333 Z76 ~ 153 173 ~ ~ SAVARI ~ \ ) 20 F7S fHpCTJ 2 ~ 9 Z! 24 to ~8 Tr xon ~-'`6 1 ~ 754 2e ~ 344 ~ 3].4 274 64 31 25 22 29 ~ ~ 1 ~ 21 z~s ~ ies 32 2 185 30 19 355 355 285 205 EAST FOREST ROAD tt5 gs 33 ~ 12 a ~ 11 8 8 G$ IS TRACrA 17 17B ~ 129 1~ 168 8 3W 2~ 1~ 5 2 74C ~ 126 3 7 207 18 13 10 BA dA T 4 Z 30B 338 15 227 13 v 85 A7 ~d 188 nB 217 707 127 107 19 ::<:`::':i;:.>:::.;:::::: . PpRCELC ROCKLEDG Area to remain NAP . N Rezone to Primary/Secondary Residentia . Ma Not To Seale ¦ ¦ ¦ Vicin~ Map aRoad Rezonings ~ Q 1184 „g, I nas v U a ~ HORNSILVERCR t4 ,oo, 3 1 rnnore 1044 1022 U 713fi 73 1195 . 5 7 8 11 12 1187 ~s- „o „ 6 „ST 1034 1081 1127 • VP~-~E~ ~R 1014 4 4 v 992 1250 3 1240 ~ 3 TRACT D ~ ssa P/S a 1200 z Q'( ino i 996 1 Z 2 a a 5 S e z I n ~ TRACT F ggg 1017 1127 If~l 1 5119 11~ 1150 3 PARC,EL D 2 475 ~ 985 FAIRWAY DR ~ - - 4 99~ , 7 6 5 Natura! Area Preservation District 930 950 970 (existing zoning) Pis N Map Not To Scale Legend ~ Primary/Secondary Two-Famsly Residential District Zoning (P/S) I ORDINANCE NO. 35 Series of 1999 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 5, ZONING MAP; APPLYING ZONE DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS TO PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE TOWN OF VAIL PURSUANT TO THE LAND OWNERSHIP ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT TO PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCKLEDGE ROAD/PORTIONS OF UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE LOT 3, TOTALING 1.78 ACRES BASED UPON THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT (NOT YET RECORDED) OF A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK 7 VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING, AND LOT 2 OF RAETHER MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED BY DENNIS SHELHORN AS JOB NO. 0332-002; AND APPLYING ZONE DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS TO PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE TOWN OF VAIL PURSUANT TO THE LAND OWNERSHIP ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT TO PRIMARY / SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT PTARMIGAN ROAD /GOVERNMENT LOT 2(1.66 ACRES) AND LOT 3(4.252 ACRES) CREATED BY A SURVEY DONE IN 1995 UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE BUREAU OF LAND IIAANAGEMENT CADASTRAL SURVEY. WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to implement the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement with the United States Forest Service by zoning property acquired by the Town of Vail from the United States Forest Service ; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that these zone designations are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area; and , WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of these zoning map amendments at its October 26, 1998 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend the official Town of Vail Zoning Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDP;INED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Ordinance No. 35 , Series of 1999 1 Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail is hereby amended as foliows: From property owned by the United States Forest Service (zoned Natural Area Preservation) and transferred to the Town of Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District, for property located at Rockledge Road according to an unrecorded replat of a portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing and Lot 2 of Raether minor subdivision affecting lots 2, 4, 7, 8A and 9A, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing; Lots 3A and 36, Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lots 10A and 10B, Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 13B Resubdivision of Lot 13 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; and Government Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian (see attachment A, an unrecorded plat). Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail is hereby amended as follows: From properry owned by the United States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District, for property located at Ptarmigan Road according to an unrecorded replat of Lots 1 through 6, Black 5, Vail Village Seventh Filing, replat of Lot 4, Vail Village Tenth Filing and Government l_ot 3; all in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal . Meridian (see attachment B, an unrecorded plat). Section 3. If any part, section, subsection; sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the. remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Sectinn 5. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. Ordinance No. 35 , Series of 1999 , 2 1 INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 7th day of December, 1999, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 21 st day of December, 1999 in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 21 st day of December, 1999. ' Ludwig Kurz, Mayor , Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 35 , Series of 1999 3 ~PUr aF ~ A RF,PLAT OF APUHTIQIY QF BLOGK 7 YAIL VILI.AGE FIR9T FILING, AND IJC)T 2 ClF .RAETHER MI1WO13 SU13DINISI()P±1--- SFCI'l[OI'd'1, TOWP?1SIHIP 5 ~OUTH, RANGE 80WEBT, 54.h PRINCrP4.I.MIEPdIDTANi ~ . ~ .s acwur ~°~'iw NeCao•(~G - - ~ _ ~ ~ [9 Pm as i4@ 'F ff e`~hI r~ ~~.BS"`~~ T 3 ~En=. a 8 /.a~. IIt ~fJ.,~l lll.l! ~A 1 ;!1Nia~.;fi 1 d ~!%i~"~I I.il:.~l.- ~~:II..II ill.i:li:`l~ ~ ..1. ^ . ~ ` k r~~ , uta~roo•c 14DT1aA W7'f66 ~ IOffM tl ~.yu L(/TQA CtYPA . ~ le.sr ~ ~ ' . ; 7/Y,r: ~s ~ .[~il'1 ' ~ w N -BAO' $ 79 - f~HNIJ ~ ~mauvrv~ ' ~,c , nj , . U~ v,~ ' . ~asx sa ' . ~e~a. r . ~ ~•.r•e ~ -~~es_ . .`E9a6"_`n~ vrurorrec.~• ( Y { apB? ~ 9 . . BC00 • i9.69 ! R• uo I• ~ ~ novoo•ii a f ~n. a .r., • _ _ ! 2' . -~e+] .~.v 0.04' ~y - . . ' ~ . . . ~ '•O>~` '..:..~~~E. E aU OYEILEP ELIPCE « :-YGR ^ 3E . . . ~.'j . A'/ w 1T~. v. . . . . . iv a ~n n _ _ . . , • r Y e i i M. • C ,4 7~$S.~DY /v. IO -""•~~.d W~9SG~U9ftQd tyA7111~ L~DI~lI ~~i nii1 n iu.i~u e r u 111Mcra a..~a~,~. ~PSIR961d~FLA7IA~FYAIL&'QDI19ltl~7P IAI' 9UMNARY TAHLi; , r~ r?~r 1 secor~d,a~r o.~E~ ~ Nq'~~ ,.K-' - :L ~~t(tol Prew a `g'-' ivev `a. iil P~~,.1M~~pY%E[p im W'17~"xiu U 1 • LOT L t8n iy. l. P111M1N /BECONDIPf IPB~ PE810~__ tat ~e ffee~ aa~. i1: ~~~o 1v n~1io~hT I~~ v\ o~ aien ~FaAAJ1ENT LiM1EICURVl7 TAOIL fp~Lt ~p~) e (yi IRYL A F Af O16~P]C~ IJflE TABIE POCxtE~GE POIO I920a an. ie. PP ply,lt P P[4n - Wy n~ono awane MC IU91U9 OGS~ "(]IIfFp uac ~axac orernnca. _ - - e~. i viu r~u•Ge ~~ns .iuxc-~ ~j;:1 . I9?7~S pR' mGP4PM!! £ChIE . -cp~ mss ' sa .e ram m...~.. rnaa~taa ..i rser~aiv. ~ru,w mrz ..w ~rau oi.c. 0 50 ' !DO !50 ` ~Aeq1 ~t'si~~~~i~q PD' Mfixn [1 treic Eow+4' ic ~m~n~ u~ Ow1htl b+ w~g•p~~ BWS [T BFM11~0. RIrE?k1R: i~v Mrl'4 ~Irn tr ba0 m~ brf~9 ~n u' EA' ft Pop! . Lmllu~~ 19YLaVMH ~ 11! 6 Y+~Y af ~1FV vtl ~m.n ~~mC },I' pr.lp9•~1EOx xtWlrp to Ve ple! M nil 11114 ilret rlll1q Oelwn BLY. UwV~n N N 1~ Xf/ W mwm [p S~Rlwa l er'O B a~f !n 4N 1/RI el lxtlm ] ~R 31 l~iap/~'op 0 Ikillty OvlrmK attNln3 ~la'IY /N~ Ue PfW]CfA PsE w•ena e sun ~am m wn~. • u~ ~1Tt'vfyry !f IQ L bMlt O! Ip[s 2 3~'R t s'~E Re )mRlm o~ fil! ' 4o~ S<' wcirt eitr+elnnl ~IVn ofRl.~ w. Sw qp][etq~ v~ AYeI i. iiu rlpN • a 91M. KL4U~M/6Mf8 W iXtl ull~ tti aq~lC;m Y WI1lY ~ti ^W b M{mdr~l~ eY s ' 0 itll0 9PYEY MNNEP ~9 IdfEO ' tleels~llm rmYltl mrL ttv+ Nla >bt. • ~t s5 ~N /KIN]NM fM ' 11 Trot Wrl)~ ol lot SL 1W9 ~~W A~ l:m vl lot 2 0l pqVq~ NYO- U. flf~F M6W rM' 0.8 fY'R.. ry lm mM ta ~ m3rR>am~ ~e~w+nt ~n1~T Ic ttt~y VhntW tn tt~ ~ow. aI bll. zl aorrlwW rom n9H-orrr •.a a~r~+uw ~ry rrver n~ xm nlst„v w.•1a raeo.p. ' md f~velss id !n r10N. Cl(AYE TAB1E a~r~a~~~ea ni ~ q wn,mce' ~ram~ rmr" i~n i il rio.n~~ r<aA•ivara~.a cvnve nac n.~mue o n aiaxe r xc c e.~e NkiN~a iry m~en lm.. m;a s~an.a cun nroln w.~.. ~ - 'e•.em~ m f ~iro i~ rmt ~nuie~ ~.anM~rv em r.ro m..,, i~ i~eo ..a ~ ~r m~, i MPP? AT OT' A~ Pt)T277L1`I U~' 1j.~.nCK i t) YI)l~y f Irat t1] rq b IpW~ rKatoO 1n ~p{ q wyl~av rocrOU Ir fnltn. VAiL VILLAGL~ rll~S:f F'ILIiJG ' ~n L(.`9' 2 rt~v;7~iErt MINOTt SUBDIVISI(11 1O : u,:. ~vtwiu ar ua t tm~m ~a ~sav m~tn o~iru runn nre cr in e w w.enr Sk~C. 7, 'P. 5 S.. R. (3U W. fih P.M. Mirtr 8f~. 1l9~ICror.e vf eW lry Irvo+warR~ m te ro1d tmrolv :Ml pcr.lttrtl. ` .u~ ~ g .a a+c~co.mt rigen nen tr wanm M w ro.~ er veii emf uxn t~rte> >or. rc.v W~ ~ ILKtvtlLy la;J W;6Yy ~KY'1. 1ua. ~ y - m +rs~ A i1 nnUm m I rretr¢t~« m.~e,~ um~ouev ariei~ wrc m Rr. anv sFCINui neui SJ ~1iMSef!0 9 . Bn Iimt IEpfNNt filM . en raen 1n e eerdreUa~ ra.a+wl t .r~ lnla olel. 1110N_ (MBAIIoN I~LKa Y. ]fl M4 W fID va v+t~ve W tw-rsllv 1Mn. ~~o raJ1Y 1~[c re ¢n10rM Gzs 25 1/2 HOAC 9-210 b*~~ ~ ~,~,~~'^„y~ ~~'d,~ „r . ~:~m ra~n~ v.ti~v reemra' ian~r~ee m iot a ie e~~e~r ~m tm ee+eni o• Gf 9ntl Jun[t ion CO B]505 1970) 243-6067 ewn:5~ ~o'...n ~n.~n'1i a~u n~~. s~ .d st i• ers~v.tu .ien un.+.n. ca.o,~HV ~~~n smrvm rm Wt fsvL 9m~ 9 ar . , ~ M r • - - _a~a.s~~~...._~.~ FlNAL FI.AT OF~ r~ ' gtEFI.AT OF L€)"1t"S 1-6 BLS$CK 5OF VAIT, VII.I.At~~ SMTIti"Tll F'ILING, ~ ItEFLA.'T OF 1f.,.,UZ' 4 OF VAIIG VdiIUrE TEN'I'H FILING, .AiWD ~OVERNMEN7C L(17l' 3. ~ , . ~ . , i.~~l,'r.:F:..m . i ~.'~.'.i~- ,:~<~:~~;".S ...!r - i . ~j------tv~^•-- eevca~ c,ea~.u• . I ~A 16C00' e ~+'ae cc "t'D . r/ ~uv~rer. LOi'f a C07'9 e L07'J LD7"4 race ~`+mnav"a°r'~i~ °vxsu~,y(' Pr~Mrl~~ f ~irW~rK ltYten v~ 0~ J1~ ii"A'se'u / 4c=66G3' ~ ~ ~--~yT~~•- . ~ v.ti' eeo ;YE K:r~ - ~ .~s-x- ~~.:;~.:.:r~~,,~.: . w. .I ~ ~mdE.Ye' • ~6'F 1-~ E__- M_ _ ~ ~ ~O`~~~ ~ • Y p fM]t 1' ti M •e ` ' Pi o qRJCI' a~-_~,._.__: rnacr a $ g • . $ m•, ~ • - i+w~2a~ ~v axam •o+. - .rw . r+v. ~ , . i ?ti GC ~ ~ i . , . r.~a• ~ ~j;.~;:l~l' ..i.l",t Q6 • . , a : % e ~,,K+ N aJwnxtAyect pmserv4~+~ 0A Cso,Mfnrq a.+Lef y a~dTr~cfiA~ , .<T, F=o^rA!S ~ ~ ` 0iR l l01' 3, • (i~' i lor J _ _ _ _ _ _ " _ _ _ _ _ I ~I[A e fd ~N 9~'OCR Y 0 109b :.0 ~ 8~91 6~IAI!G9 91P~EIEM: 11R I~al~ atGFl Mq~ pN1 oi a D"1er 1 :URYe S•°,]L ~~P9z, Mr.mi B1~Y.~`~ ¢Y mvrs^_a !~er 2 m! Cr'n. CV RC A01 9 plLrTA CHO1Tp 9'W0}~6 OflD Ih~ u, u. ~ v F.QO m fASI. Pr-i ece . --6-~ ~t d - - - a~~, a~~s'v3~' ~a,x, 1,~~ RIta191N. NWINN/aa1M19 Ua 5i IAT 3U M TABIY z~-ii' Y.'ro' ~ w. e~'ar~ rtu.? ~1Pf.i IY~C ~"1 ;vrP \ t P4+LEL MEP L~xG 116E N. I 9~,n' - ' • • FF~ ~L IFSN ~Y W ~ p, 1 apq f PB156 ac. 1t. Pp114PY/9ELOt[IMY 1L C) eC.'0' 9i0. ' ~'G y'fY'F rosmttutitia rt6 IW]B' a Em g e~oo~ i v.e. ~w.wri~cuo.ur {~i 2110 p~ 9~,oa~ a ~ppyp . ~}wnrioECUamr as~p~xr , . . ~ u. l~i P B~IX% i YOCJO sa. Il. PP.~!N~I/9F4 WY (EB [EM1~l ~ pp rr c in . ~ ~oi ~ °sa: : ry~~~'+ ~ In(~ 1 ni I m ein r e ~a ft RI;I'1 A7'Ui~ L(11'A> 1-6 F3I,UC r~~~~~~,s~a~=, I~ 5 ` ~;9w~ ~ ~ .a. , t. » ~ ,)F' VAIL VII.~LAGE SI~,VFN7H 1~'IL[NG, ]]GB4 6e. 11 ` o p~ vIlL v]LI~GH ~BrtN~iL aG m ~ ~9"~'"b ~ I 4pt OME) ev. 1t. 9L~ ! VAIL VILL.1ff SFVfl1,X Fxl]NG ~pqyR ~~~y pVt b mWat Yv ll'~ Zdn n~ h5t ~w< wn tMfl ]o! v+a , ~ Las~ ~a. crr.~enoczp~ tti ] .~uwara uinun~are ~eunna,.. LO'J, 4 nF W~~ ~~111AGE TFNrI-{ Aa,.~;:,~~^~°°^•.^R°°m~°~•a,°°,"• FILING, AND GOVI,RNM.EN1' 1..Of J. w, r~o e , TOWN UF VAll., .a l 41'11M1M1 ~ MY ~99 er.a son mia.t r[aorae scn 1410MP80N-LAN R[1 MAPORAIYUN 529 25 .12 RpAD - i' 8-?10 Grand Junction CO B7505 19701 243-6067 vie, os ~,.ee ~ {~".i0.~°'~?7. w~n"..W` : : oe,~o<a g: me c,m~.e : ksr .m ro. vse~oz .._.~.....e.....,~.,~.. . ~p s~o,,. wrs w~s~w.,. a~w• m,~ ae i am 2 e ll TOWN OF VAIL - Department of Cammunity Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 MEMORANDUM TO: Town of Vail Town Council FROM: Gary Goodell, Chief Building Official , Building Safety & lnspection Services Team, Community Development Department DATE: December 2, 1999 RE: 1 st Reading, Ordinance No. 36, series of 1999, Amendments to Title 10, Chapter 1, the Town of Vail Building Code, for December 8, 1999 evening meeting The Town updated its adoption of model codes to the most current editions, with the exception of the electrical code, with Ordinance 98-19, which became effective January 1, 1999. The 1999 edition of the National Electrical Code (NEC) is now available and is proposed for adoption effective January 1, 2000. This update and other proposed bui(ding codes amendments were also discussed during the Council's afternoon work session on November 23, 1999. The proposed amendments are summarized as follows: ' • 1999 NEC Update. Update from the 1996 edition to the most current 1999 edition of the National Electrical Code (NEC), retaining some minor amendments that have been in place for many years. One of the existing amendments is being modified to reflect the current list of occupancy types found in the published 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). • Residential "C.O.s." Modify the exception in the published Uniform Building Code (UBC) to require Certificates of Occupancy ("C.O.s") for newty constructed one- and two-famiiy dwellings and private garages, but not to require C.O.s for remodels and additions to existing dwellings. This simply reflects current practice within the Town. • Semantic and editoriai changes. Several minor changes are proposed for clarification or editorial reasons. Like the rest of the proposed amendments, proposed deletions are shown struck through and new additions are underlined. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town Council APPROVE proposed Ordinance 36, series of 1999, on first reading. GRG:grg attachment: Proposed Ordinance #36, Series of 1999 RECYCLEDPAPER -1- ORDINANCE NO. 365 SERIES OF 1999 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 1; ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 1998 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1997 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL , CODE, AND THE lNTERNAT)ONAL PLUMBING CODE; THE 49961999 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE; THE 1995 EDITION OF THE MODEL ENERGY CODE, AND THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, AND, WITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED CODES, ADOPTING CERTAIN APPENDICES, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD . THERETO. . WHEREAS, the 1998 edition of the International Mechanical Code (IMC), the 1997 editions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), the Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) and the International Plumbing Code (IPC); the 4-Ng 1999 edition of the National Electric Code (NEC), the 1995 edition of the Model Energy Code (MEC), and the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) have been published; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to adopt these codes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN'OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: 1) Article 10, Chapter 1 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows: CHAPTERI BUILDING CODES - SECTION: 10-1-1: Preamble 10-1-2: Codes Adopted By Reference 10-1 -3: Amendments To Uniform Building Code 10-1-4: Amendments To Uniform Fire Code 10-1-5: Amendments To International Mechanical Code 10-1-6: Amendments To National Electrical Code 10-1-7: Copies of Codes Available 10-1-8: Penalties 10-1-1: PREAMBLE: The Charter of the Town of Vail and the statutes of the state of Colorado provide that standard codes may be adopted by reference with amendments; and the Town of Vail wishes to adopt the 1997 editions of the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform Mechanical Code, the Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings and the International Plumbing Code; the 1998 edition of the International Mechanical Code, the 1995 edition of the Model Energy Code, the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, and the -#Q" 1999 edition of the National Electric Code. NOTE: Itefns t1Tat are dashed thyotigh {4asheb~;!hi:eugh4 are existing ajiietidments that are proposed to be cleleted. Items that are underlined (un(lerlined) are proposed iaew material. Items that ar-e neither dczshed throacgh nor underlined are pf-oposed to remain as is. -2- 10-1-2: CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE: A. Building Code: The Uniform Building Code, 1997 edition, Volumes 1, 2 and 3, including Appendix. Chapters 3, Division II; 11, 12, Division II; 13, 15, 30, 31, Division II; 33, and 34, Divisions I and II; is hereby adopted by reference. The Uniform Building Code, 1997 is published by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 Workman Mill Road, , Whittier, California 90601-2298. . B. Fire Code: The Uniform Fire Code, 1997'edition, Volumes 1 and 2, and all appendix chapters thereto, is hereby adopted by reference. The Uniform Fire Code, 1997 edition, is published by the International Fire Code Institute, 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601-2298. C. Mechanical Code: The International Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, including Appendix A, is hereby adopted by reference. The International Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, is published by the International Code Council, 5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 708, Falls Church, Virginia 22041-3401. The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1997 edition, and all appendixchapters thereto, are hereby adopted by reference as an acceptable alternative to the International Mechanical Code, 1998 edition. The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1997 edition, is published by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601-2298. D. Plumbing Code: The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition, Chapters 2-12; Chapter 14; Appendices A-J, and Installation Standards 1-13, 16, 18, 20 and 21; is hereby adopted by reference. The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition, is published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 20001 Walnut Drive South, Walnut, Ca4ifornia, 91789-2825. The International Plumbing Code, 1997 edition, - including Appendices B-F, is hereby adopted by reference as an acceptable alternative to the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition. The International Plumbing Code, 1997 edition, is published by the International Code Council, 5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 708, Falls Church, Virginia 22041-3401. E. Abatement Of Dangerous Buildings Code: The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, is hereby adopted by reference. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, is published by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601-2298. F. The National Electrical Code, 1996 edition, and all appendix chapters thereto, are hereby NOTE: Items that ar-e dashed througli 64ashed tlf-eug#~ are existing amerzdrnenls tlaat are pi•oposed to be deleted. Iten2s tlaat nYe tcnderlined (underlined are proposed new material. Iterns tliat. are neitlaer dashed tltr•ough nor ufzderliiTed are pf-oposed to r•emain as is. I ' -3- adopted by reference. The National Electric Code, 1996 edition, is pubiished by the National Fire Protection Association, Batterymarch Park, Quincy, Massachusetts 02269. G. Energy Code: The Model Energy Code, 1995 edition, is hereby adopted by reference through adoption of Appendix Chapter 13 of the Uniform Building Code, 1997 edition, as noted above. The Model Energy Code is published, by the Council of American Building Officials, 5203 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041. 10-1-3: AMENDMENTS TO UNIFORM BUILDING CODE: The following amendments are hereby made to the Uniform Building Cade, 1997 edition: Chapter A34, Section A3406.2 of the appendix of the Uniform Building Code, 1997 edition, is hereby amended to read as follows: A3406.2 Effective Date. Within eighteen (18) months after notification by a building official of the Town of Vail, the plans for compliance shall be submitted and approved, and within eighteen (18) months thereafter the work shall be completed or the building shall be vacated until made to conform. Sections 107.2 and 107.3 are hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 107.2 Valuation. The valuation for a building permit shall be based on the average cost figures per square foot shown in the building valuation data chart published bimonthly in the Building Standards Magazine of the International Conference of Building Officials, a copy of which shall be on file in the Department of Community Development of the Town with the following modifiers, or on the actual cost of construction, whichever is greater. CONSTRUCTION ZONES Modifiers Zone & Title $ Per Sa. Ft. Identification ZONE #1 1. Matterhorn 1.0 Matterhorn Village, Vail Village West 1 st & 2nd, Donovan Pk., West Vail exit to Coldstream south of freeway. 1. Intermountain 1.0 From West Vail exit west on south side of freeway. 1. West Vail 1.0 Vail Ridge, Vail Das Schone 1 st, 2nd, & 3rd, Vail Fieights, Buffer Creek Rd. west on north side of freeway. ZONE #2 2. East Vail 1.2 ` East of East Vail exit. Includes all Bighorn Subs., Pitkin Creek Meadows, Gore Creek Sub., and Vail Meadows. 2. The Valley 1.2 Lions Ridge 3rd & upper sections of upper sections of Lions Ridge 4th, Casolar, The Valley, Cliffside. NOTE: Items that are da.shed throtsgh (dashed h~ are existing amendments that are proposed to be deleted. Items that at-e zcnderlined (zcnder•lined ar•e proposed new matei-ial. Items that ar•e neither• dashed thraugh nor undeYlinecl are proposed to f-emain a:s is. -4- 2. Lions Ridge 1.2 Part of Lions Ridge 1 st and 2nd East Buffer Cr. Rd. to Vail View. 2. Sandstone 1.2 East of Vail View Dr., ABC School Dr., including Vail Run. ZONE #3 3. Potato Patch 1.7 From Potato Patch Club north. 3. Booth Creek 1.7 Vail Village I 1 th, 12th, & 13th, Vail Mtn. School, Booth Creek area both north & south of freeway. 3. Golf Course 1.7 Vail Valley 1st, 3rd & 4th, Vail Village 7th, 8th, & 9th, Northwoods and Pinos del Norte. 3. Village Area 1.7 Vail Village 1st, 4th, & 5th. East of Vail Road to Gold Park. 3. Glen L.yon 1.7 Glen Lyon Sub. & Cascade Village up S. Frontage Road to V.A. Maint. Shop. 3. Lionshead 1.7 Vail Village 2nd, Vail Lionshead 1st, 3rd, 4th & part of 2nd. Lionshead parking structure to West Day lot. ZONE #4 4. West Meadow 2.6 Vail Village 3rd & 6th. Part of Vail Beaver Dam Area Lionshead 2nd, TOV Offices to residences adjacent to Vail Mountain. 4. Spraddle Creek 2.6 North of Freeway to new subdivision. 107.3 Construction Fee Schedule. The construction fee schedule for the Town of Vail shall be maintained in the Building Safety & Inspection Services office ID'vis+ea af the Community Development Department. Section 109.1, Use and Occupancy, is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 109 - CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 109.1 Use and Occupancy. No building or structure shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy therefor as provided herein. EXCEPTION: Additions, alterations or repairs to existing Group R, Division 3 and Group U Occupancies. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. Appendix Chapter 12, Division II, Section A1208.1, first paragraph, is hereby amended to read as follows: NOTE: Items that are daslzed through. *shed tkr-eng* are existing anleridriients that arepr-oposed to be deleted. Items that af-e uriderlined (under•lined) areproposed new niaterial. Items that are rteither dashed tlzr-ough nor underlined ay-e proposed to remain as is. -5- A1208.1 General. In Group R occupancies, wall and floor-ceiling assemblies separating dweiling units or guest rooms from A-1, A-2, A-2.1, and A-3 from each other and from public space such as interior corridors and service areas shall provide airborne sound insulation for walls and both airborne and impact sound insulation for floor - ceiling assemblies. (Ord. 15(1993) 2, 3, 5: Ord. 25(1991) § 1) 10-1-4: AMENDMENTS TO UNIFORM FIRE CODE: The following amendments are made to the Uniform Fire Code, 1997 edition: Section 103.2.1.2 is hereby amended by replacing the words "police officer" with the words "peace officer" per CRS 18-1-901, 3(I)(III), Peace Officer, Level II, to read as follows:. 103.2.1.2 Fire prevention bureau personnel and police. The Chief and members of the fire prevention bureau shall have the powers of a peace officer in performing their duties under this code. Section 103.4.1.2 is hereby amended by replacing the word "condemnation" with the word "hazard", to read as follows: Unsafe heating or electrical equipment and structural hazards. When the chief deems any The chief is authorized to affix a hazard tag prohibiting the use thereof... Section 105.8 is hereby amended to include the requirement for a permit for the following items only: a.4. Asbestos removal c.1. Candles and open flame in assembly areas c.2. Carnivals and fairs c.7. Compressed gases c.9. Cryogens. d.1. Dry cleaning plants e.1. Explosives and bla5ting f.1. Fireworks f.3. Flammable or combustible liquids, for: . 4. Underground tank removal 5. Installation of fuel equipment 6. Installation, removal, alteration of tanks 7. Alternate use of tanks h.1. Hazardous materials in excess of Article 80 limits h.3. Hot-work operations 1.1. LPG (see Article 82) 1.2. Liquid- or gas-fue(ed vehic(es in assembiy buildings 0.1. Open burning , p.3. Pyrotechnical special effects t.1. Temporary membrane structures, tents and canopies Section 207F is amended to change the definition of FALSE ALARM to read as follows: The activation of a device or transmission of an alarm signal, indicating an emergency exists and/or necessitating response by the Vail Police Department or the Vail Fire Department, where no emergency exists. NOTE: Items that aYe dashetl through {4ashed-t-lrangk} are existing amendments that are proposed to be deleted. Items dhat are under•lined (unclerlined) are proposed new material. Items that are izeither dashed through nor under•lined are pr-oposed to remain as is. -6- Article 10 is amended to add to•Section 1001.6.4, the words as foliows: Tampering: The unauthorized removal, manipulation, alteration, adjustment, operation, service, maintenance, installation, or other action, involving an alarm system or components thereof, including but not limited to wiring, devices, equipment, control panels, switches, and other appurtenances, by any individual, person, corporation, or other entity, who is not in possession of a valid and current Town of Vail Contractor's License, as required by Town of Vail regulations. Section 1001.7.2, Clear space around hydrants is amended to read: A clear and unobstructed space shall be maintained around a fire hydrant with the following minimum distances: front - 15 feet, rear - 4 feet, sides - 7- feet. Fire hydrants shall be installed and maintained to provide a minimum of 36 inches of clearance between the center of the outlet caps and finish grade. Standards set forth by other, agencies, including the water district, may be referenced and enforced , providing the most restrictive shall apply. Section 1003.3, Sprinkler Monitoring and Alarms, is amended to read: - All valves controlling the water supply for automatic fire sprinkler systems and water flow switches on all fire sprinkler systems shall be electronically monitored. Section 1003.3 Sprinkler Monitoring and Alarms is further amended to delete items 1 and 2, as follows: 1 TWon~~i n.~r in ~rn~~ r~ I, ...Ili.~iicin..1n 1.1 ...o.nr! 1 7 (lnn~in~n~ios . ~y . m.n.....ro . . . ~ ~......p......... 2. Ll .,,.no hi inrJrorl nr mn,.v., in oll n+hor nnn~ monnioc o... .,.,.,...r.,».......... Section 1007:2.2.1, General, is amended to delete Exception.1. Section 1007.2.2.2 is amended to change the phrase " , " to "occupancy load of 500" in both the section title and the text of the section. Section 1007.2.4.3 Exterior alarm signaling device is amended to add the words "only when used as a fire sprinkler flow indicator." Section 1007.2.9.1.2., Manual fire alarm boxes, is deleted in its entirety. Section 1106 is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1106 GAS METERS AND PIPING Above ground gas meters, regulators, and piping shall be protected from damage by ice or snow, and if exposed to vehicular damage due to proximity to alleys, driveways, or parking areas, shall be protected from such damage in an approved manner. NOTE: Items thczt ai-e dashed t.hrough {dashed Mrengh~ are existing amendments that are proposed to be deleted. Items that ar-e undeYlirted (undef•lined) areproposed new material. Items that ar•e neither dashed t12rrough nor under•lined are proposed to remain as is. r Section 2501.16 is hereby amended by the addition of Section 2501.16.4 to read as follows: 2501.16.4 Standing Room Only Prohibited. Lessees, owners, managers, promoters, their employees or agents shall not advertise, allow the sale of, or otherwise permit standing room only access or tickets to be sold at indoor or outdoor concerts, meetings, or other assemblies. The use of cross aisles shall be restricted to egress and access only and shall not be utilized for standing at any such concert, meeting, or other,assembly. The use of the area between the front row of seating and the stage, bandstand, security barriers or other similar physical barrier shall not be permitted to be used for standing room. (Ord. 25(1991) § 1) 10-1-5: AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE: The following amendments are made to the International Mechanical Code, 1998 edition: Section 801.12 is amended by deleting the text of item number 6 in its entirety and renumbering item number 7 as item number 6. Section 926, "UNVENTED ROOM HEATERS," is deleted in its entirety. 10-1-6: AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. The following amendments are hereby made to National Electric Code, 4496 1999 edition: A. All electrical wiring in Groups A, B, E, F, H, I, aad W, M and S occupancies as defined in the Uniform Building Code shall be encased in conduits, raceways; or an approved armor. All wiring in Group R occupancies shall be encased in metal conduits, raceways, or an approved metal armored cable to the circuit breaker box for each unit. No aluminum wire or copper clad aluminum wire smaller than size 8 will be permitted within the Town. B. Persons engaged in the installation of remote control, low energy power, and signal circuits as defined in article 725 and 760 of this code, need not be licensed themselves pursuant to Title 12, Article 23, Colorado Revised Statutes, nor work under the supervision of such licensed electricians; however, all such persons shall register with the State Electrical Board. Proof of registration shall be produced by the registrant and qrovided to the Town of Vail Building Official. C. All such installations of remote control, low energy power and signal systems are NOTE: Items that are dashed thf-ozigh {4shed tkr-eng* are existitig amendmeizts that areproposed to be deleted. Items that af•e underlined (Linderlined ccre pr-oposed new material. Items that are neither dashed thi-ough nor undef•lined are proposed to remain as is. I -8- subject to the permits and inspections set forth in 12-23-116 C.R.S. Accordingiy, all installations of remote control, low energy power and signal systems must be performed in accordance with the minimum standards set forth in the National Electric Code. 10-1-6: COPIES OF CODES AVAILABLE: . Copies of all the codes adopted by this Chapter and all amendments thereto shall be available for inspection at the office of the Town Clerk. (Ord. 25(1991) § 1) 10-1-7: PENALTIES: ' A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the Codes adopted by this Chapter or . fail to comply therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any order made thereunder, or who builds in violation of any detailed statements, specifications, or plans submitted and approved thereunder, or any certificate or permit issued thereunder, or within the time fixed therein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalty as provided in Section 1-4-1 of this Code. The imposition of a penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation or permit it to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violation or defects within a reasonable time, and each day that the prohibited conditions are ' maintained shall constitute a separate offense. B.- The Town may maintain an action for damages, declaratory relief, specific performance, injunction, or any other appropriate relief in the District Court in and for the County of Eagle for any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter. (1997 Code: Ord. 25(1991) § 1) 2) If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. , 3) The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4) The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has ' accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date NUTE: Iteri2s flzat are dashed thr•ough (dawhed 4} ar-e existing arnendnients tlzat are proposed to be deleted. Items tliat are undef-liried (underlined) ar•e proposed new material. Items that af•e neither dashed through noi- underlined are proposed to remain as is. -9- hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5) All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repeal shall not ' be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. 6) The building codes adopted in this ordinance shall be effective for all building permit applications received by the Town of Vail, Community Development Department, Building Safety & Inspection Services office Divis+sn, after January 1, 2000. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 8th day of December, 1999, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 22nd day of December, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 22nd day of December, 1999. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk NOTE: Items that are dashed through 64asked-tlo;eugk-} are existing amendments that ar•e proposed to be deleted. Items that are underlined (underlined) are proposed new material. Items that are neither dashed through noi- underlined are proposed tv remain as is. ORDINANCE NO. 33 SERIES OF 1999 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF.TOWN AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR THE 1998 TAX YEAR AND PAYABLE IN THE 1999 FISCAL YEAR. WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Town Council to provide for the levy, assessment and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1999 year and payable in the 2000 fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, that: 1. For the purpose of defraying part of the operating and capital expenses of the Town of Vail, Colorado, during its 2000 fiscal year, the Town Council hereby levies a property tax of 4.064 mills upon each dollar of the total assessed valuation of $513,881,260 for the 1999 tax year of all taxable property within the Town, which will result in a gross tax levy of $2,088,413, calculated as follows: . Base mill levy 4.690 $2,410,103 Mill levy credit (.627) (322,204) Abatement levy .001 514 Total mill levy 4.064 2 088 413 Said assessment shall be duly made by the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, as directed by the Colorado Revised Statutes (1973 as amended), and as otherwise required by law. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 1 I 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. 1NTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this 16th day of November, 1999. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the 7`h day of December, 1999, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED in this 7'' day of December, 1999. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk . 2 TOWN OF YAIL O, f, j''ice of the Town Manager 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 . 970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 MEMORANDUM TM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager DATE: December 3, 1999 SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report Leadership Vail Valley Attached to this memorandum is a press release from the White River Institute regarding a new leadership program which is being implemented. This program known as Leadership Vail Valley, is a four month leadership program for Vail Valley residents interested in discovering and developing leadership capabilities. The Town of Vail is participating in this program in partnership with the Beaver Creek Resort Company and Cordillera. The Town of Avon is also expected to join this partnership in the near future. As indicated, it is a four month program with meetings one day per week during the four month period. If any of the Council members would be interested in attending this program I can provide you with information regarding course content, schedules, etc. Retreat Follow-Un It is my intention to provide the transcription of the retreat notes for you on Tuesday. We will be scheduling follow-up sessions in the next few weeks to discuss each of the critical strategies areas (housing, transportation, infra-structure, etc.). You may want to consider on the Tuesdays when you do not have night meetings beginning earlier in order to move through these issues in a timely manner. RECYCLEDPAPER UPCOMING MEETINGS 12/14/99 WS Leo Vasquez - 15 year anniversary PEC review annual presentation of investment report WestFest Wrap-Up discuss Ski Club Vail's rezoning and redevelopment plan discuss VPH proposal discuss W. Vail employee housing discuss refinance housing bond 12/21/99 WS DRB review Ford Park managed paxking Marketing board Inc. 500 Group presentation discuss Ord. re: zone change/Buffehr Creek Park (expansion and conceptual design presentation) 12/21 /99 TC 15` read Ord. re: zone change/Buffehr Creek Park (expansion and conceptual design presentation) 2"a read Ord. 36, re: building code 2°a read Ord. 34, supplemental 2"a read Ord. 35, re: Rockledge & Ptarmigan Rd. rezone Wayfinding phasing schedule Res. valley-wide census 2000 complete count committee 'flPR-07-1900 21:23 p,02 1- • W~ IT1La ~ ~ ~ ER Press Release 'Bo,?M O~ "TRU~r~s. ~ RBTTE RIVER INSTYTYITE ANNQUNCES LEADERSHIP ~ . PROGRAM. ~ . leoberi BWCkma,i ! : . ' • ~ Bucbr~c Isrboratories vaii valiey, Co necember 2, 1499 Bwger.Conciriniry Gror.p c.. The White R.iver Instihrte announced today I.eader.~'h$v Vail Valley, a four- c~ier&,A5,j,°C'~rCS month leadership program for Vail Valley residents iaterested in discovering and developing their leadership capabilities. . ~ 2?'aiiagon Cuides ."CQ:r[ta~:i•.~~r~Pr~a, . The program is designed for individuals from the private, public and not-for- ~.4RCT~io?ral Ttd profit sectors and is intended to build leadership competency at all levels of ~o~ ~oT~-x~i~ both organizations and the community-at-large. ' ' ~Yhite Riv'ei I'naritrue :~.W. Matliew Jiiechter . According ta Johri Hotan-Kates, the Institute's president, "The purpose of tbe To,n o:Ro~ . ~ progam is to build a sustainable stream of high performance leaders in the Vaii Valley to serve and support the long-term health of our cammunity." pa;a p~`; Horan-Kates said he hopes that from this progmm "participants will become more effective leaders within their organizations and also in the extended • • Dr .(olui S: :TamNrkM.A „ C4~7f;ell';~ho[~ of Meditirte COIIITY1L1111~+. BonRn og , sCHorwes The program will be launched in mid-March 2000 and will include .:D,:.ieoberi;r,tea~r,'n~u; approximately (20) partieipants in the initiat session. The course has been made possible thmugh genemus support from the Town of Vail, the Beaver X~; p~p : Creek Resort Company and Cordillera. ; ".T6e'liialsori Ixutirutc Town of Vail Mayor Ludwig Kurz commented that, "The Town is enthused ~4,sium: cmua about tlus program because inspired leadership generally creates better communities. And ernployers wilI find mQre efTective, motivated employees eoucrm.;.opAnVis:oces are Iikely to be more committed to the vaIley." :~Syr~e'lN~~ax?veU : The I,eadership Yail Y411ey course wiIl be an on-going Program, .UP7.0fin&er implemented oYt a semi-annual basis for diverse constitutiencies. The , EentesforResaurre Manage-ment program wi11 be open to a11 interested and qualified individuals from East Vail to Gypsum• Interested persons can self-nominate or be nominated by ; 71ie Inventrire: G?vup employers or associates. Tnterested parties can request a nomination form by &,;dy;s sinww„ds, F&D. email or regular mail and submit it to the White River Fnstitute by the January 9[rn~piitpn Cejiter 6f 1he. Rockies j 5'h deadiine. ' P.O. Box 6447, Avocv, CO 81620 PHOCVE970-926-78W Fivt: 970-926-4339 ~ ' ~ FrKnn.: wri@vail.net Wss: www.wriver.urg RPR-07-1900 21:24 p,03 A Selection Board of (5) people will seek pazticipation across ages, gender, education, income, neigbborhood, economic sectors and employment position. Cxiteria far selecting participauts will be based on genuine interest, leadership pdtential, inclination toward personal and prc?£essional development and commitment to the progrann. In addition to a . : . ~ : written application, norninees may be interviewed. :....The cutriculum to be used is based on the premise that in order to grow as a leader one must . grow.as a person. The foundation of leadership is buiId upon who you are and what you can become, not wh$t you do. The program will draw upon a set af "natural principles" : :geneiated by the Institute's staff, its Board of Scholars and other leadership experts. The . `program will help create individuals who can lead from a strong internal sense of who they . are and wha,t they bring to the wortd - something that will benefit all sectors of our , . ~ community. . . ' . . ertY g , En le President of Cardillera and one of the underwriters of Leadership Yafl Yalle a y ..•.;~..caaimented, "It is clear t6at ti.me pressures and productivity demands are uicreasing for both . . 5•t? intlividuals and organizations. We need to develop leaders who can both serve and guide our .~:a~gamizations and our valley to success." . . :Jr.;'' . Atnoft various outcomes that partieipants will realize, perhaps most important, will be the creation of an individualized "leadership plan" that will chart each persons leaden'ship developuient. Employers who support participants can expect to see inereased leadership effectiveness from their people, as well as increased links with leaders in other public and private organizations. . .a : . ~~;L,eadetsh~p Vail Valley participants wi11 meet errery other Friday afternoon, plus an extended a q~'vo-day: ifltensive session in early Aprii. The program will use both the large group and •~7 _ smalt, group dialogue formats to foster the Iearning and understanding. . ;4: . Scliotarships for the program will be provided to every participant who needs financial support.. A registration fee af $100 will be used to cover program materials and boplcs. Tirp'1Vfinger and John Horan,Kates will coordinate the leadership prograrn. Minger heads the Ceuter for Resuurce Management in Denver and is the farmer Town Maaager of thc . ~ Tawn of Vail. Minger served in the Governor's Cabinet in the mid-1980's and is cturently . an Adjunct Professor in ths University of Denver's Graduate School of Business. Horan- -`:Kates helped found the Wlute River Institute and has held various leadership positions in the Vail V'alley over the past (25) years. F~or:more inforrnation contact: Johm.-Horan-Kates, White River Institute, F.O. Box 5447, Avon, CO. Phone (970) 926-7800; . : . _ t> ~?ax (970) 926-~t339; emaii at wri @vail.net. . TOTAL P.03 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE Monday, November 22, 1999 MEETING RESULTS Proiect Orientation / PEC LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ASSENT John Schofield Galen Aasland Diane Golden Brian Doyon Tom Weber Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill Site Visits : 1:00 P.M. 1. Rezoning -1950 Chamonix 2. Webster - 2755 Snowberry Drive 3. City Market - 2109 N. Frontage Rd. West 4. Ski Club Vail - 598 Vail Valley Drive Driver: Brent NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. 1. A request for a minor subdivision, to allow for the re-alignment of the right-of-way, located at 2755 Snowberry Drive/Lot 10, Block 9, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: David E. Webster Planner: Brent Wilson MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 6-0 APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITiON: 1. That the applicant provide the Town of Vail Department of Community Development with a revised final plat with all required signatures for recording, prior to final Design Review Board approval for any improvements on the property. ik 70I9NOFYAIL ~ 1 2. A request for a variance from Section 11-46-3, to allow for one additional building identification si~gn, located at 2109 N. Frontage Rd. West/Vail Commons City Market, Vail das Schone 3~ Filing. Applicant: City Market, Inc. Planner: Allison Ochs MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 6-0 TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 13,1999 3. A request for a worksession to discuss a redevelopment proposal involving a rezoning, conditional use permit revision and development plan approval for Ski Club Vail, located at 598 Vail Valley Drive / Part of Tract B, Vail Village 7Ih Filing. - Applicant: Ski Club Vail, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Planner: Brent Wilson WORKSESSION -.NO VOTE 4. A request for a rezoning from Primary/Secondary to Outdoor Recreation, located at 1950 Chamonix/Lot 34, Buffehr Creek Subdivision. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie Planner: Allison Ochs MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: 6-0 RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL 5. A request for a worksession to review a major amendment, to allow for the proposed redevelopment of the Vail Village Inn, Phase IV, within Special Development District No. 6, and a conditional use permit, to allow for the operation of a fractional fee club in the ~ Public Accommodation Zone District,.located at 100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N, & O, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 13, 1999 6. Information Update - White River National Forest Plan amendments. 7. Approval of November 8, 1999 minutes. The applicatians and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department - . 2 12/01/99 WED 21:50 FAX 9709499227 SHAMROCR Town Council Nem (M001 ' ' ~ f .s ~~II~ ~~?'~Z lL~ ~~'L~ ~ ~~~~Z ~ ~ . ~ vvs MA MEETING ~ ~ . WE.DNESDAY, DECEMBER STH ~ : 8:15 COFFEE ~j 8 :3 0 MEETING C';OLORA.DO SKI MUSEUM ' AGENDA . ' . • TURN IT UP ! • EMPLOYEE 4F THE MONTH • "I'M FROM VA.IL..." • FREE SKI LESSON • INTERNET REF''ORT AND SURVEY • WELCOME PA(--KET •"SANTA CLAU S IS COMING TO TUWN..." u ToWv oF vA~, 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 2, 1999 Contact: Greg Hall, 479-2160 Public Works/Transportation Director/Town Engineer DOWD JUNCTION RECREATION PATH CLOSES FOR WINTER SEASON , (Vail)--The Dowd Junction recreation path has closed for the winter season at the request of the Colorado Division of Wildlife. The winter closure allows for the migration of deer and elk and was a condition of the recreation path's approval. Gates have been used to indicate the path's closure as well as signs explaining the requirement. The path will reopen in the spring at the direction of the Division of Wildtife. That reopening date will be determined following a review of a migration study conducted over the past finro years. For more information, contact Greg Hall, public works/transportation director, at 479-2160. # # # RECYCLEDPAPER ; i , MEMORANDUM December 1, 1999 To: Vail Town Council Bob McLaurin Pam Brandmeyer Steve Thompson From: Sally Lorton Re: October sales tax collections Attached please find the latest sales tax worksheet. I estimate I'll collect another $7,400.00 in October sales tax to bring October collections to $513,998.00. If so, we will be down $18,654.00 or 3.5% from budget and down $1,533.00 or.30% from October 1998. In October 1998 we had the World Wide Church of God group in town and the Seibert Circle Dedication Party. T'he World Wide Church of God did not visit in 1999. ~ ; . : I i ~ Town of Vail Sales Tax Worksheet 12/1 /99 % Change % Change 7ss9 Huuget ~rom irom Month 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 1997 1998 Budget Co/lections Variance 1998 Budget January 1,126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,855,364 1,805,707 1,894,597 1,935,782 2,052,569 2,115,359 2,188,943 2,065,876 (123,067) -2.34% -5.62% February 1,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,828766 1,814,495 1,816,107 1,993,389 2,089,673 2,153,121 2,228,041 2,020,814 (207,227) -6.14% -9.30% March 1,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 1,988,090 2,250,656 2,139,298 2,240,865 2,580,992 2,368,077 2,450,164 2,413,592 (36,572) 1.92% -1.49% April 550,205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 864,303 794,668 791,092 966,993 874,427 1,107,334 1,145,861 952,059 (193,802) -14.02% -16.91% May 170,567 215,548 236,359 250,809 268,000 257,248 287,315 324,681 318,920 329,783 382,718 396,027 370,241 (25,786) -3.26% -6.51% June 329,039 393,470 448,227 468,948 468,598 475,161 548,820 590,685 594,907 630,366 633,400 655,430 692,168 36,738 928% 5.61°/a July 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 811,538 892,830 893,483 963,717 1,043,637 1,107,882 1,146,156 1,129,771 (16,385) 1.98% -1.43% August 575,887 668,119 678,071 761,992 767,257 825,954 891,566 867,125 990,650 1,073,430 1,183,926 1,224,834 1,048,899 (175,935) -11.41% -14.36% September 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 645,902 630,453 637,831 735,608 760,913 800,533 39,620 8.83% 5.21% October 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367,578 400,525 408,405 461,791 413,573 472,836 515,531 532,652 506,598 (26,054) -1.73% -4.89% Total 6,822,389 8,265,646 8,700,946 9,154,425 9,259,517 9,867,484 10,419,667 10,424,761 11,049,249 11,785,544 12,302,956 12,729,023 12,000,551 -728,472 -2.46% -5.72% November 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 497,907 553,681 594,491 611,147 601,208 707,166 656,596 678,336 December 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,775 1,846,223 1,974,553 1,992,855 1,994,540 2,068,851 2,254,709 2,070,834 2,132,272 Total 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,603,647 12,395,718 13,007,013 13,030,448 13,719,308 14,747,419 15,030,386 15,539,629 12,000,551 > > /21ai9g , to: Vaii Town Council from: M.K.Arnett Dear elected officials, This note is to inform you of my desire to serve as an "at larqe" member of the Vail Marketinq Board. I claim no specific knowledge of marketing, other than that I've gleened from my town council experiance and the two years I've been a member of the VVTCB Board of Directors. I also represented the town in the meetings that were to lead to the formation of a regional marketing effort. When it became evident to me that other potential partners were either unwilling or unprepared to proceed, I suggested that we,(the town), pursue an independant marketing district. I do believe, (in the long run), the regional approach would best serve the marketing needs of Vail, and the Eagle River Valley. At the same time I maintain that any marketing representation must exist on a pro-rata scale. I've been accused, (by some), of havinq one of the more creative minds in our community. I'm ready to put this creativity to work by taking what- ever direction i'm given by the council, and making positive efforts on the Vaii Marketing Board. My commitment to this community remains. Also I'm kinda cute, and a really qood dancer. Michae K. Arnett RECEIVED NOV 2 9 1999 RaderEngineering Inc.ii=.iiii P.O. Box 780 • 133 Riverside Ct Suite #1 • AVON, CO 81620 • Telephone 970-845-7910 • Fax 970-845-7522 • e-mail drewsld@vail.net December 1, 1999 Ludwig Kurz & Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: GRFA Requirements ~ Gentlemen, In recent projects, we have noticed a drop in dedicated mechanical space on new construction. Maximization of living or usable space by the designer or Architect has been the primary motivation of this trend. Current Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) requirements indicate 425 square foot credit is available per Single Family Residence, Two-Family Residence, or Primary Secondary Residence in addition to the standard requirements. In conversations with the Vail Building Department, this credit was originally intended for dedicated mechanical space, though it is not specifically stated. Because of this discrepancy, designers aze using this credit to maximize living space, disregarding or li.miting the mechanical space, which is required for safe and efficient heating and/or cooling of the structure. We are proposing an amendment to the current GRFA requirements to have this non-specific credit changed to a specific mechanical space credit as originally intended by the code. This change will solve many space and safety concerns not only by the mechanical engineer or designer, but also concerns by the Building Deparhnent. Please review your information on this subject and contact us regarding this issue. We look forward to your call. Sincerely, ~ J. Drew Rader, P.E. Dan Goodman Principal Design Engineer DEAN O. MORTON , 25857 WESTWIND WAY , LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA 94022 TELEPHONE:(650) 941-2971 FACSIMILE: (650) 941-6243 December 1, 1999 Mr. Greg Hall Director Town of Vail Department of Public Works/Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. Hall: I'm told by Jeff Bailey, at the Lodge at Lionshead, that the shielding fence alona the south end of the Lionshead Charter Bus Lot has been installed. He further stated that it was nice looking wood construction. I want to thank you, the Town Council, the Community Development Department, and others involved for your responsiveness on this matter. Although I haven't seen it yet, I'm ' sure this added screening is a significant enhancement in the appearance of this parking facility and we want you all to know your action is appreciated. Sincerely,~' ~ Dean and LaVon Morton Lodge at Lionshead, Phase 3, Unite 11 • cc: vVail Town Council Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Larry Pardee, Street Superintendent Jeff Bailey, General Manager, Lodge at Lionshead ~ . . . . . - ; ~ F . , ~ I ~ '~';f~ ;k.~ ~ e` ~•i t~:`? ~ X-y ~ 1~.~ { : , . ta~t`- . • . { z - ~ . f ~ i ~ } ~ ' ~ I j . ~ •O ~ , ay` I ` F ~ , ~ : . . ? ~ f i'1. ..i , 1 ~ p • z' ~ { 3,i ~y~' r : -a .~F ~ ~ • e ~ l ~ ~ .t ; c . • .Y.~y9 .°J r '1t4, 4 T .3i i s ' ~ l.r z ~~„he'.`~ . • ~ 9 ' t-t~~ i, i ,~ts ~.a °S i j . mponauthoAlY Q~ i g iF~ d ~ , ' - : G~' . • g~ Ra ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ f oo ~v~~ ? r Z'i ,r ~.:v , 3 - a • - ;t e~ 4' a„ a,r,,~'~~ #'}y~~{ tk'~~ ~ #l ~ ~ ' f , ' , y - b c - - ~ 'k i ~ { ~ ~ ~ v S : 7 ( `aj ~f ',i .w t1~A~/SPO~1~T;'0~..' 1~~01~'~~~.~ ~;~'t. t~ • . . i f < 3 i ~ ~ d f. n 1 i .F'.. 'a+ . F e~ ~J, a ~ t +e .e =A S t~ `PECI ~ ~ ORD~A I~ ~Nv~ S YOtI 0 A ~ x# ~ ~ , s"' • }V.; j :5- k ' - . •g . _ ~ I ~ Cr . ~y t ~ j~+k ~r. 'r i yr ' . . • . , ~y : a x s . L`f ' : . . . < t t : g 7 ~ `i~ Y Yt~ 3-.R . " : . 1 ~ F _ . i~ . . . ~ ~ q. •t a S. r~ : s t. - • _ . , 0~ ? . ' ,x ap'~ ~ . 4,~ _ K} `"D . . ~ i.` t'~~ Sn W~ y~ j . . . f 1 , ~ _ . ' ~ i . f .a N,e' P ~ J ~ . •sm{3~ ry i. S i ~ n'~ p . $ j ~ .c ;s _ . . a . ` ~1~f~7J..' • - ~ 14 1 ia4nu.t ~ . 7.3~? a t. k • ' _ ; dN . ; ~ i ~ + ~ t sF S,e, ¦~oo~oo • ? G~ j s r' ~ ~ _ . 1- T 4.r ~A a ~Etri' ..s . p e ix ,q,... t ~ .er4'~4 ~f~~~a p~~i '°su.yj~ r ~ ° ~ s~1 ' . • ~ ~ a~ t "T}: + . xa . a^ ~ ~ '~S 4 ~~'°~.S`.~ e ~%~,.~s ' j. A ,~Y , ~ ~r i ~ ? r 34 ~.y~ ' ~~v~~ yU+ ~ . ~ ~ ` . - , , ; , - :x.- . t, ;x a w s a~~d t -1Cy tEv ]/,h ' . L ~,f ~J r b t d ,e~f3 (~Y } . § i t~ 3YCf' ,k.,. ~j.~ 3€t rRa t, x ..n i ~:r,yJ'. 1 " • O ~ ~ a a+3~ 1 r , j ~ n ~ ,i a ' ' . . , :f £ ~ti~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ( fiRS1 ~100R Of iNE AvOM 60R1 B~iLDiNG, fORMEQLY~GRAUiE'S) , ? . ; , ~ ~ , < . ' J ~ • ~ . ~ • ~ . ' ~ .e a. { l . y . ah"f : r i : t d i . : y ~ • • ~ , T ~ . • ~ 4 ~ , ~~~`e • ~ • ~ i"`f ~{al 1 ; .G ' . • J . . -1,- , _ , ' , . ' • ~ F . • 1~:.~,=.::~ ~ ~ . i d . !ti.,v- ,x•~', i r cho * t idcare citps Created by the Childcare Resource & Refenal of Eagle & Garfield Counties A program of The Resource Center of Eagle County December and January, 1999 "Peace on Earth Begins at Home " Letter from Dana Damm Deaz Providers: As many of you know, the Department of Human Services in the five counties of the Rural Resort Region (Eagle, Pitkin, Garfield, Lake and Summit) , in a joint effort to promote quality childcare and to enhance the licensing procedure, have contracted with the state to provide their own Licensing Specialists ~ to inspect, investigate complaints, and to license childcaze homes. The five counties have hired two Licensing Specialists, one for Summit and Lake Counties, and one for Garfield, Eagle and Pitkin Counties. .The have.also hired one administrator for the project, Bill Evans. Jan Englemann will continue to license Summit County homes and will also license Lake County. I was hired as the Licensing Specialist for Garfield, Eagle and Pitkin and will begin on December 1, 1999. We aze all excited and hopefui that this will be a positive change for all providers in the five county region. The negative part of this change is that I will no longer handle referrals for Eagle and Garfield Counties. I will miss that! Thank you for allowing me to serve you in that capacity for the last several years. I look forward to continuing our relationship. Sincerely, _ Dana L. Damm Dana tivill continue to handle referrals until a new coordinator is hired for the job. The Referral phone line remains 1-800-513-8859. We will be transferring the line in mid-December. If, for some reason, it is troubled during the move, please be reassured that it will work again! A=-- r='-1 r=- 3%~ s.w s. r. •t4 ra rC~ a. 1a a-a ra s. ^ F~ 1. :5 ra rw r~ Child Care Resource & licLppy sr,;Referral: 1-500-513-8859 A 4 i; tASy' r~ A CORRA r^ ro r~ aa ra ra a•~ a~ ro r~ r~ ra ra ra r~, a~ PARTNER 1 f,mployrnont Opportunities Eag1e county Famfly ~ Child Care Association program Gomrdinator Child ounti sare Resource & Referral of Eagle and Garfield January 11,2000 C The Resource Center of Eagle County is accepting applications 6:30pm until 8:00pII1 for the position of Program Coordinator of the Child Care R&R at the Eagle Cty. Library of Eagle and Garfield Counties. Must have two years of post secondary education or experience in Early Childhood Education and/or Huma.n Services. The successful applicant must be multi- Officer Bill Kaufman of the Eagle task oriented, have a pleasant telephone demeanor and working County Sheriff's Office will discuss lrnowledge of Windows 95. Fax cover letter and resume to: Attn. safet3' ~~anger awareness to the Bev Christiansan 970/949-7087 or mail to P.O. Box 2558, Avon, children in our caze. You will receive Colorado 81620. one hour of training. Call Cazol for more information- 524-9581. Full Time Director ~ % t~ ~ Little Red Schoolhouse 4,40; ~ The historic Little Red Schoolhouse in Snowmass Village is looking for a full time director for its NAEYC accredited Attention Parents, Providers preschool and toddler programs. We provide a supportive envi- aud anyoIIe ronment with flexible benefits and a salary commensurate with interested in early childhood! experience. Please fax your resuma to 970/923-4602. Please attend the The Eagle County Family Child Care Association meets monthiy. To learn more about becoming a member or about Early Childhood the training's they offer, please contact Carol at 524-9581. Council Meeting The next meeting will be held on January 1 lth at 6:30 at the Eagle County Library. See announcement in newsletter. Wednesday, Pre-licensing Training will continue to be taught by Dana January 5th Damm Please contact her at 974/945-7121 for future training 6:30pm at `ates. Avon Elementary Child Find- Do you have any concerns about any of the children with whom you aze working? Do any of your parents Details of topics will follow in have concerns about their child's speech and language develop- the mail closer to the date... ment? We know that the early childhood yeazs aze the critical time to support a child's development. Child Find is a community Input from community mem- service that provides a FREE hearing, vision and developmental bers is strongly encouraged! screening for any child from birth through five years of age. It is held twice monthly on Friday momings between 8:30am and please RSVP to Jeawe Mc- 12:00pm Pazents can schedule appointments by calling the Child Find voice mail at 845-5999 or by calling Sharon Thompson at Queeney at 328-1375. Piaa will 845-6370. be provided based on the num- The dates through 1999 aze December lOth and 17th. ber of people who RSVP! ~ - - _ _ . ` CPSC Warns Against Placing Babies in Adult Beds Study finds 64 deaths each year from suffocation and strangulation Washington, D.C.- The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CP5C) is warning parents and caregivers about the dangers of placing babies to sleep in adult beds. A CPSC study published in the October issue of the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine found that placing babies to sleep in adult beds puts them at risk of suffocation or strangulation. This is a danger of which many parents and cazegivers are unawaze. The study revealed an average 64 deaths per year to ba.bies under the age of 2 years placed to sleep in adult beds, including waterbeds and daybeds. A review of incident data from January 1990 to December 1997 linked adult beds to at least 515 baby deaths. Analysis of the deaths revealed four major hazard patterns: * Suffocation associated with the co-sleeping of adult and baby. * Suffocation where an infant becomes entrapped or wedged between the mattress and another object. * Suffocation due to airway obstruction when the baby is face down on a waterbed mattress. * Strangulation in rails or openings on beds that allow a baby's body to pass through while entrapping the head. - CPSC's study is the first to quantify the number of fatalities resulting from the practice of co-sleeping with ba- bies. Of the 515 deaths, 121 were reported to be due to a parent, caregiver or sibling rolling on top of or against the baby while sleeping. More than three-quarters of these deaths occurred to infants younger than 3 months. The other 394 deaths resulted form suffocation or from stranguiation caused by entrapment of the child's head in various structures of the bed. Entrapments occurred between the mattress and the wall, bed frame, head- board, footboard, bed railings or adjacent furniture. One of the most tragic aspects of these deaths is that they aze largely preventable. In many cased, the adult plac- ing the baby in the adult bed was unaware of or underestimated the danger posed. The practice of co-sleeping can result in the adult rolling on top of or next to the ba.by smothering him or her. Mothers who breastfeed should be alerted to this hazard and should be encouraged to return the baby to the cnb after breast-feeding. "Don't sleep with your baby or put the baby down to sleep in an adult bed," said CPSC Chairman Ann Brown. "The only safe place for babies is in a crib that meets currents safety standards anci has a firm, tight-fitting mat- tress. Place babies to sleep on their backs and remove ail soft bedding and pillow-like items from the crib." Ofthe 394 entrapment deaths, 296 were on adult beds, 79 were on waterbeds and 10 were on daybeds. Bed rails , which are portable railings that can be installed on toddler and adult beds to keep toddlers from falling out of beds, accounted for nine baby deaths. CPSC is workirig with the bed rail industry on the design of these products to reduce the hazard. For 1998 and 1999, the Commission is aware of at least 76 additional deaths, 35 due to suffocation associated with co-sleeping and 41 due to entrapments. The Archived of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, a member of the Journal of the American Medical Association family of journals, study "Adult Beds Are Unsafe Places for Children to Sleep," primarily written by CPSC's Suad Nakamwra, Ph.D., was co-authored by Marilyn Wind, Ph.D., (CPSC) and Mary Ann Danello, Ph.D., (CPSC). Nakamura gave details about the findings at an AMA briefing in New York today. (September 29, 1999) ~ DEC. 3. 1999 1:31pM i Na, 6768 p. 1/2 ~ I i e; ~ BEA.VER CREEK RES;ORT COMPANX FOR IMMEDUTE RELEA5E Media Contacts: Kelly Ladyga, (970) 845-5292, Kiadyg~~-vailresons.com Christina Schleicher, (970) 845-5136, 5scblei1l ~ MIKE IRECTOR OF ACTIUIUS AT BEAVER CIZEEK ~ BEAVER CREEK, Colo. - I7ec. 3, 1999 - Mike Klosex W recently been named Director of Activities for Beaver Creek, a new position created by thr Beaver Creek Resort Company (BCRC). Kloser will staft in his this position on Dec.15, '1949, after he returns frozn competition in the Discovery Channel Eco-Challenge in Patagonia, A'rgentina. .A,s Director of Activities, Kloser will be responsible for coordinating and marketin,g special events and weekly acfi'vities ~ within the village. ~ ; One of the many activxties that Kloser will be overseeingiat Beaver Creek is the "Welcome to Beaver Creek" event, which will take place every Sundai? evening by the ice rink. The event helps guests to learn about upcoming weekly activities, v~cluding ski or snowboard lessons and programs at the Vilar Center. Cruests can book these actiyities and then lace up some skates and enjoy complimentary 1ce slcating. The Figure Skating Se ~es is another fun event tha# will be overseen by YCloser. This free skating exhibition takes pl3ce from 6-6:30 p.m. every Monday aight and features local amateur figure skaters. Kloser wlll also oversee Tuesday Night at the Movies, Thursday Night Astronomy and the Snowshoe .Afdventure Series. Next summer, he will host avaziety of on-mountain hiking amd mountain bilanl; activities, i Last winter, Kloser worked as Adventure Ridge Operations Mavager at Vail. He spent the swmmer at Beaver Creek constructing mountain bike trail;s and ruuning ongoing summer activities. "Mike's past experience and ability to zun actirties at'Vail and Beaver Creek, and his commitment to world-class services, make him an outstatliding choice for birector of A,ctivities," ~ -more- I ~ I P.O. $ox 5390 • Avnn, Colorado 81620-5390 (P70) 845•5858 • FAX (970) 845•5945 , I DEC. 3.1999 1:31PM N0.8768 P. 2/2 KLOSER NAN,Ep DIRECTOR OF ACTIVITIES 2-2-2 said Tony O'Rourke. Kloser is an avid mountain biker anid a top international cArnpetitor in the sport. In 1988, he became the world mountain bike champion. He went on to become the first American to race extensively on the European World Cup Circuit. In 198S, he wan the European Mountain ]Bike Championships. His enoxmous contributions to the sport of mountain biidng have earned tum much recogilition; Mountain Bike Action named him ozze of the top ten mountain bikers of all time. The Vail Valiey has benefited from Kloser's expertise, as he helped design many of the bildng trails on the mountain and in the Valley. Kloser v •on this year's 100-mile mountain bike race in Vail, the Vai1 Ultra 100. Presently, Kloser is in Patagonia, Axgentina, training for the 1999 Discovery Chatuiel Eco- ChaIlenge as a member of Team Vail. The Eco-Challenge takes place from Dec. 1-12, 1999, and is a physically demanding expeditian that requires compe titors to navigate through the wilderness using limited resoutces. Using a map and conipass, each tea;nn will rely on horseback ridiug, mountaineering, kayaking, whitewater canoeing a id cliumbing as the rneans to reach their final destination. Kloser has already represented Team Vail at tvvo Eco-Challeriges. At the 1997 competition in Australia, the team finished in 19"h place. Last year, Kloser helped lead Team Vail to victory in the Eco-Challenge in Morocco. Kloser and his wife, Emily, and two kids live in Vail. Vail Plaza Hotel 1999 Maj or Amendment Proposal Attachments December 13, 1999 1\ . FF~~~ _ ' _ ` ` ~ / ~ a ~ 1 f . . _ • _ • ` ` • ` \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~*+~Yfj~~ s Et 1 j . 4 / I d v, .~C } ssw 1 ( IL ~ r ~ ~ I 3 , A. r.;, s y t~ xt Y~ ~ .`1"~r~ k4 i~ 4 r 4 ~ . ~ ~ J:.i• ~~.,~~5 ~ ,d:~ y... . ~ . i ,'i fi.....,.~' 1 ~.ikF.t„~,:~~ ~ V - ~ # ~r}f~' • ~ Pi~ifi~~ i y~~ik1~y ~ p , 4 ~~+r i 1 u ~ ~ ~ a t~~~~W s ~i . ~ ' " s, s• ~ ~ , , t s , i ~,j , S~{~T. ;;a t+ + ~ ~ : - y : sU t ~ss.:.. h ~ ~ # u ?~r ' . ' 3~99~+~ b r ar ~l.,.w ~ . ak l~? xs V . ~ }F ~ i s ~ l f t afl, ~ : ~ ~S ~ 51.: ~ a , . . x ~ . . , _ o 20 ao xn DuaStop f7 • ~ rale:l"=2o• ~ ~ ~ Zn^ E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel Si p E~rac. te Illusstrative Plan ~ ~n~o;wunr~u~aiaun.iueu U vall, CUIOI'a(J.0 .....o., Nov.ember 23, 1999 ~ I . . , , _ I - I-70 Franinge Roarl f . , . , . ~ _ ~ . . ; , C) C~ ~ ~ o t~ --~n~-" - ; ~ I I r. ~ Gateway Building Vail \'illage Lui ~ i ~ Building B Phase llI 4......._..._...... ~ ~ I ' i. _ ~ ~ ~ . , : . J. L ~ ~ $uilding A ~ Vaii Viltage ljn ~ ~ ~ ; ! ~ip' ~ ~~~~~jl ^ ~~~Q~~Q~ ~ i i Yhase 7~ ~ Plxase '~-1 Phase Ilt r C).~ : , a ; . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~v51 voIag 'w~'~ Circulnliuu Legencl A ~ C B : , Lxternal Pedestrixn ~ Vail Village Ian . . East Dleadow Drive Phase V . ~ • , - (nterual ~ ~ - ~ ~j ' ~ ' -j 1-" VQl11C11lA1' ~ Z E H~R~E N Va.ll Pla.Za HOtel 1.. T ~ ano•assocIn^esr~c. , ~~~LU~i~llUll 1~lail Vall, Colarado a• Scplenber 27. 1999 Not ta Seale _ - _ _ . I' t ' ; 1 ~ 11 I ~ I ~ I I . , ' ~ I n . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . - ; . . . . . ~ . ~ , : ` ~ / ' . ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ , . i` _ . . . . . . ;r . _ ~ . . .:+,~..z:;. ~ ~ . . : , i ° .,.:.~~.t::~.. , i . ; ~ . ' - . ~ ~ . . . • \ . . , . . , i ' _ - "l , - , . ~ - . ......r _ ~ : - _ , . , . . 'i.,., t y ~ '1 I ~ ~r~ ` ~ ~•4 x „v + -e, A.~ 'M~-r-*i! ~ . ~ . _ . : . . ~ ' ~ I~ . 1 F.. ~ 1$ ,i' ~ ~ _L-1 i ~ ~ t , 4h~ , , I 1 ; ~ r:? i ...1...._. i 1 I C i ~ I h~` . . ' . . . _ _ . t : : \ ` i , • . , ~ . j{~ ~ : i . . . ~ J ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ i • , ~ - - i ; . . f71 I~ f~ ~ \ ~ r C ~ r~, ~'A , . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ / \ . . - :}i'-~ . , \ ~ . ` ~ ~~:~_..._...i• N ~ ` s, r`~ ~S}b \ ~C_ . . I ~ \ , ; r+ J ; `,i ~ y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i S ~ ~ , ,.1 'j ~_1 (h " _ • . ~ ~ ~r y ~1 \ i~o_/ ZUE" R E" Vail Plaza Hotel S1tC V1g[tetteS Vail, Colorado Key Plan - November 23, 1999 i . PLAZA PROMENADE . _ "d llccess oint into x I p p t o i n e n a d e a r e a •Ilandicap access to all levels of promellade. LANDSCAPE NODE • Hardscape/Softscape nodes identify transition areas along promenade and rnews. ~ M-w CL1uJnlo~v~L S~ralR • Grand scale transition in promenade levels. F 15' ~1 ky i.r i ~ G c'p ( - II I ] ~~k HOTEL ElV1'RY • Guest and/or pedestrian Access to hotel & public spaces. .~n 777- fff Of PIAZET IA ~ • Garden plaza at pool for hotel Guests ~ , ~ f.~.e' ~ ~ ZN E H R E N vall Pl~.IZN. HVte1 . Slt!', VIgIIet~.~,'S ~i~E;lunF ~~nhNixp ~ AD F A oOC.ncam~o.e~INC. ' NtF~~ons•i.x0ic+re~nc~i~r(ei~nE Vail, Colorado November 23, 1999 PLAZA • Outdoor dining & Seating area ~ Major activity center , a. iY~;'s tt e ~ , •I~I y~ , t:~; ~ ~ C€. ~?ifi1i` ~ ' ' r ~r ~ a 'i TIZANSITION SPACE , • 1~latei-ial, grade, changes signai ~ cliange in space and scale. . i o ' Mzws • . M... i' S~I I ~~1 ~ ~~~F 1 . +I ~ ..F+N Gai-den pallis create connect i o n s b e- ~ tweenspaces. ~ . ' . 3'4 ai f .,I . ~b''~ Z 4~ ,T r ~ T [ ( ~ 1 M'r 9M ¦'Ol~rl,L'1L tj~j nfrl.u E .~t ~ : • Architectural elelnents signal entries 111t0 C]1S11g1Ilg Sp1CeS. - `r:~` I ~ F 5" PEDLS I'RIAN CONNLCTIONS • Paving patte1-ns identify pedestrian cannections betweeli new & existing spaces. ~ Z F H R E N q~~i.(~ Vail Plaza ~Iotel ~ AN °c,^O'e`4ara;~eimNC. i;l Nli{J~iiel.l4s villl, C0l01'ildO November 23, 1999 r. _ _ . _ . _ _ ~ _ . - - - , - - t r ~ a s f I j . ~ ~,,alk~ f x~ ; ~I _5 5. ~ sF.r t f I v lti. V ii 1~ bf f~.tls +zLt ~"r; . +t F I ' . Y^.~WV"I.~4 • p?' ; . ' r&4 9 `t-1h~. n'.~?c47•~`b~'" ~.,.9, . ~ 'S~f . - ~~~~~~A,~~ ' I f"~w~k"~• e u a~ r ~ ~'r~~ d : ~'r~'~" ~ ~ fk4t ~ _ ;.9 } y, . I 'te 3 Y..~ ~ . ~ ~it I F ..c,$~ ~4 L :F.. ?i~ A Yryl"~~~ :i ~~ryJ~~~. ~ : Q'F oE~ . k.i I t ~ . ~I h;',ifd5~'~5~ 3 { f~ { F •1. k_ ' - V41,i ot -.'1 ~ ~ A r ~ ~ , ~"olora~.lt~ dAsf ~'~?~`i~~~~~,~~?w 1.~!1€1 I , . , . , i. . h~.liYr.17, y~~y~1 j7~' ~ ~ .ptBj.t~:~ ~r..~#~r ii.r~"- Y.7"~.e.'~!G'$r.~'a' ~.,E ;.r~0~ .,i'~:tb a+3 ~~~~:Fi ~r,.~. . ~t ~U" u:F .iL:'i::J..i . r•~yr u1~i,.y, ,w1fji. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7~~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~P ~ ~ , s P~""i r~ ~ ~I I . , II , . ~ ^ I aax" . - n a~ I iy L t 7- i I „!d:' d J II . I ~ ' n ~ p a I ~ M, ' ~ y f s I I A y~~Y K 1A. ; i t k ~r . ~ v,~ # ` L y s P ( , ~ ~-~h 4 I; . ~ . . . . t-la,,.. ~a ( , A E ~ ~ ~~ot4 ~~~~~~u" . N'ittl, CI)IUCadCi 1'Joi~en~ber23, 1tl~~l ~i`.,~R~i~ M'~~::~`1;:~ _~r.. . _ - . . . , _ _ _ , . , r~ ; ;I :}!,~{.;7}ktd Tl~ iq; . . : t ( I . r ~.d, . , 1 , ~~.a y. 7~; +~~~r.~f.~ - ~ a , rM1 r~'M~,rf.j•~` j ~ r ~ s a~;p ~ ~ ~ • ~ ` - ° i ~ ~ , . . ; L r,.~.. ~ : ~ ~ i . ~ ' ~ • 1 • ' ' ' ~ . ' : f~ w , ~ ~ , . . . „ . ; • , ` , F . ' i ~7p Y ~?N,.:~ '1.- R`•~4. . d I . . z g ~ li~za`~~ _f~_~'~ t.a l L• p I ~P~1~7~~! ~.J~~I:.~'C~{,f~~lN +•,~~~~..V~.~~'~ i Nta1 c.tiibe,' ;!3, 1999 - - l- ~ ~ - 01 e m ~ ED ~ i $uilding p v~ I~ B i - - N/I 0 , \ q _J ~ J U ~ / _ - _ - - - \ Va0 ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ml Ham Hote~ t ff~o'rn b ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~6k~ ~ Vail, Coloradv AMCterua . nnr" ra . rmir.re - I r.oxu un nvort araaoo ~i~e Noventber 13, 1999 Scale: 1"= 5U'_u" m n~clMOifr r.~xnmrw~o~o . ~ . , ° _ 45-UI' Pwelling --C-1------~ ~ p o o ~ov« <<~~i - u'i' ~ ga ° 0 ° 4,_U~~ 41-UL CO _ I <..U,. 0 i ~ Building B ~ - - - 9* 43-UL ~ O 41-iIL • - ` O I v. ~ z ~ - ~ O - ~ i i ~ - -A ~ VaH Ham ~ ~ a-fl u~ ~ ~ ~'~ott~~ ? (Lc~vc~ S a~s nNO nssocinres, iNC. . Vail, Colorado A-MM. . ~ Scalc: I 50'-U" r.o-x un n-, marv~teo nwe November 23, 1999 mmwsnavr rNdmrwiwa - ~ - , -T t--r-i . ~ ~ . , ~ ~ o . _ ~ r L AS L [J i IJ.L ~ n~~ _ _t_ _ O v- - - r \ I / l I I 1 I3uildictgH ~ i I ~L „ -LL - 4 I I ( I~~ I I 1 _ I ~ m O m 3111 UL 6{UL 17{UL - 1 , W ~ 0 ~ _ - ~ i ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o--~ ~ ~ ~ (~1 ~9~1~ ~ Ham ote~ i ~.c~vcD ~ove nND nssocinIes, iNC. Vail, Colorado • ~..~x . M.~. ~a nm+Nm~r 1.1lSMM~IdO November 23, 1999 Scale: I"= SO'-0" , _ vpb ~ ~rto ~v .31d~~~ ~y ` ~ - - - ~ ~ 4r ~ ~ ' \ ~ • - ~ C3 ~,~~~~t ~ ~ ( r R ~ L ~ - 5----- i ~ i ~ ~ ao os ap e 446 ~ ?a~ . a `r--- - 13~ 111 ii; tts- an-r I 7 ,1- - r i ° 117 - - 7 uio 0 I1A 1{Y O % ) 11 mi ~ ~ j in ~ ~ - r BUSI(Itllg B ~I ~ I ~OL F•- - 27-UL Spm . . -0 ~ - - - 3 -ci. 10 ~ - - ~ . ° n \ ~ - ~ - ~T T~ - - - ~ I - `~11~ , ~ 1?" ~ - - ~ . ~ / _ - _-1-~-- ' f I F ~ o~,~. ~ o uL ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~140 Haza r~ot~~ ~ ? Levd I~o& nrvo ~ssocinres, INC. Vail, Colorado .KMN.W. ~Nm~ Novemher 23~ 1999 Scile: I"= 50'-0„ ~.ONAI if)f AWJ. Wn4P0 1iate RL If)qf/fa1f1 IA«~Nf~1o10 ~ ` ~ ~ ° - - _ - v~'•`` - - ~ ~ 0 H: ~ n ru ~r~s _ 31-F 32 i " --tito ~ ~ ~ - M7 ( HB L ~ H9 Q - BB o~ Ht1 _ f1 N1 til4 i Hi - ~ ~B~uilding B~ HI6 , a "i _ ; nkch;n Ca M,ia os C B• ~ - - - - aos aos 1 26.F _ ~ sa 6a °sa° a °m ~ ~ - 17 H1B H19 H20 H31 H22 H7J h12 - ~ ~ ~ H75 ~ M26 2A- ~ 13-F :0) cm J J [l l ~ _ --A* ~ a T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~o o Maza ot~ fl ~ ? ~~vd Three ANO ASSOCIATES, iNC. -Vail, Colorado . . n"°"m Scale: 1 50'-011 November 23, 1999 m era..w:r r~n*•...~o.e ~ ~ ~ • ,e a~ ~s ~a ~ L ~ 7 J H, r H2 ' I 119 M6 ( {17 . 1. tlb Q ~ H13 tilo H„ ~ n ~Building~B _ L ~ 4 ~ rn - - ~ ~ 0 ti16 / 1 , GO 7L7 L7 ~ ~s-~---- _ _ 0.F ~ ILI , ~ @ o~ ,do ~B 2`~ ad, 00 rn ° ~ H17 MtE 19 N3 - N71 H32 H23 9'F o ~ r a o - - ~.oCT7 ' ~4~ H24 HIS 6.F O I I - ~ \ Buildfng A I Nx7 H:a I r h119 . ~ ~nQ • F ` I J 31 H3 H33 H34 . 35 H3 ~ ) L1 j ~ ¢a oO9o 0A ~ ° ~9ao ~ Naza Hote~' i? Levea Two, ZEHREN Vail, Colorado „ AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - Scale: 1„-_. 50'-0 November 23, 1999 I.0lOR 111~ A\VN. OOIOItAW ~f~ I TBb~ul~Nml~ fwYNNS~f~~en~ V , W_~~~ ~ - , Lubby ~ I I oad'n q a ~ servicc y Y _ ^ R an 0 O p O~ o a~o_~~,uaa ~ oR,„a„~ p a",u, o u Q n • ~ v a n(D nIOD a aL'a~apa ~ U ~ - ~a,~ a0 _ • O C) C? O Q 0 o. ~ L c ~ . ~ C3o s ~ \ ' _ l f 1 n~w~~ <l~ . ~L1o DU~~{~Utoo ' - r)t ~ L lu~ ;sITi6 ~.,.r . ~ . - - % fi7 L ) H8 faid ~ 119 T~uildiag A 1412 NU . i14 r 1 I115 \ ~ ~ L1 n o ~i O Cj , 1116 lil7 }SI8 H19 H20 H21 pa i -l \ i \ C \ ~ ~ p ~j ' 7EI}-0 f~ EN Va~a q u IT ~aza u (~t1 ~~td i? Levd One AND AssocinTes, iNC. Vaii, Colorado Scale: 1 50' l)" '°q' November 23, 1999 r~snmwsiao m omww' 0 ~ p ~ i 0 Q i i _00O~ p o a sn~in I Q ~p~p-o 0 ~ r aQ~o~O0 0 0 0°0 0 0 , -~a~~~ o~ ~ ~ • a ~ p aQo°a~p 0 0 0 0 0 0 , I ~ 1 I ~ I 1 ~ ~s Below QQ Exodu ~ ~ ~ CZL ~ ~ qpm O gtm Q , ~ ~ ~7 nq ~ Q Aecwntlne po. ~ itawl one o0 ~ .n4 > ~ ,j ~f~C~Q~DC7? ~ ? ? ~ i ~ i Clu ainnTw,o ~ r N ftml Ofllm \ 1,. . ~ f ~ ~p H N ZE~--fl I~ E6~ V a aza l! ll ote~ LeQ/eQ ZeD'o nNO nssocinres, ir4c. Vail, Colorado """"'"`."'ojm +n Scale: 1"= 50'-0" Alavernber 23~ ~ 999 ~ ~F IN{hMHRI 0tl i ~ , ~ ~ ; ~e _ e~ :.P,s _ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ' ~ i ~ . Tre.m+errc ~ I I . WPT-" I Salon - ~ I ~ C3 _ ' - - ~obby 0 Pool tiero6la ~ I ~ ~ • , CCD O . ~ I I e4 F.i~ e.u e-ie v.n r-ie F-19 F.70 F-a c.1 ~I 4 I I cc-s ~ I L c.F a rrkina • _ ~ L~.~~ _ _ ~ _ ce r I v.t $ ( I V-2 f-31 P.70 P39 F-7e f.27 F36 F-15 F-71 F31 F-13 F Il PI~ L'~ F~13 PJ7 FJ~ f~7! F•76 F-27 F-71 F-34 P40 F-11. I--- ~ I F•10 ~ I ~ 1 C.a ~ F.1 F.7 Pfi n 1 C.I11 F-0 FJ F-] F.7 1'.1 C-11 ~ v I • \ ~ ~ I ~ . \ \ ~ \ \ IN ZEHREN VaH Maza Gr-iotd ~ ~.~~~o ~o~~,~ nND /~SSDCIATES, INC. Udll, Colorado uo~txnia . a'n~ . ~mum Avm4 November 23, 1999 Scale: 1"= 501-0" nRra~Mmn r~r^--w~m -I i - - . . V.IW V.107 V-]] Y.77 V-79 V.7R 11 ~ ' _ V.10 . ~1/ f V.71 V.<V I y.3 7 V.2 { ( ~ t I 9.. I I I V.IO V.75 \'.70 V.JI V'7R ~ v.i LI 711 ' I y.lUfl u~ v.ian v_te ~ v.e~r ~ v-+i . ' . ~~.?9 ~ f V'77 ' V'R4 I - ~ V.IA9 V.98-i V-76 I V.67 V.1M1 ~ VJI \'.5 I 11 ~ V.110 V.91 ~ V179 I i V.66 ' V~dS V-Itl -V.-96 J I `-I'BU_J I `''6! L I ~ V.II7 V.Y< V-ql V-64 ""47 \'-31 V-8 ~ . ~ ~ ~I v.n~ v.9s v.az ~ v.u " v~~A ' vau v.v I Y-114 V.97 Ip+ V-e.~l ' V.E2 V~9 V~ V.IIS V.92 V.511 ~.3I II d v-iin v.as v.co v v.s~ L v.s-7 v ~ .u~ I I L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ e.ya v.ae v.~-~s9 t .si~f ~f I I I ~ V.B9 ` v.e7 ~ v.se V~s~J v.u v.14 ~ I L--Jk--_JL---j I v.an r v.i=~ ~ v.its ~ v.zr 1 v.is ~ I ~iT v ~c ~ I I ~ r-,r--,r-_~ v.iZ,. - V_:z .•.17 ~ F40 F31 c-72 [23 FF~1f JIF-26 ~F-17 F-31 [19 F-311 F-71 [32]F-31 FJI V 111 F-RS \'.57 VS4 .2 J ~ F-IV I / 1 F-bl V' S6 V'`y , L' v.=' ' \'.I I , , r. i e i F-n 1 IV-IIF i-19 F-48 i-17 1-1E F-47 1-11 F-U F.A3 F-I 1.10 1-39 FJ1 F-ft FF-35 F-IS / IV.11 Fd0 1-51 F53 1~57 F-54 F.SSfI F.7G F-fl F-5 - F-f') F,, F-61 /J 1 C= 1 FII F.10 1.4 F.R F4 1.6 F-0 FJ FJ F.S F~1 Cd , - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~-----r-------' ~ ~ti~ , G . ~ ~ V~1a Haza Hoted ZEHIREN ~?Lede[Mnus Two AND ASSOCIA7E5, INC. Vail' Colorado Scale:l"=50'-U" ' Novernber 23, 1999 m erq14w1e7 rnxemWao . ~ I. CIu6 ~'h;~~dSCb+r- flotel Holel ~ - - - - - ' • . - '_6._m °f~el~ '~fi~.i~~III'3T_' - - - - ' ~ w ~ - I~~n~ml93" 9-41 ,-m Y{•'.$?0 4}'i~.iumHt'i-.. ~ .~tum-33''SR41 - - - North Elevation East Elevatiori a - Z 4~. - - -7ud e „4, $f:~ro1Qiars~- - - - - - --n~iSH}na,0 4t.~~ mI~ . Lc tl0 1 .SI IIII 4M°~3s s; West Elevation ' Sout6i Elevation i I o 0 ZE~--~ u~ EN M~1o ~ ~ Maza G°`{11~tC~d 4? (~~oo~~long A [EDcedadons AND ASSOCIATES, INC. VaII, Colorado Scale:t"=50'-0" ~A"" "~O`~ 0D1O'ADO •'a~° November 23, 1999 I tae>qw)Wf) rnwb>"•N.~qp ' I _ _ 1 , _ . _ . _ . -u.-,N•°.t+0 tw= Cluh clue iuy aim ~ Cluh ciub ~ - - -r-1fY1lR' 0 Club CIu6 Holcl ~bWm°iu~.s•- - - -•-tr:ti tYt~E38 ~°VmiAPfi-' 14ate1 -'-OTTt9!!.l~0 Hoiel Hotel llutcl~ Hmcl $hS::i~rr~-- - - -'-~~`fS`A'F-0 $~:~i1~a~•- . i9~44'P Remil Ro~nil Il ._.~m i North Elevation East Elevation Cotirtyard Courtyard Club - -~sr~~{?N 0 ~ ~ ~Club ' Club Itmd ~7 - 1 Ciuh E3 clut Gu6 tmiei ti~oid ch~n - _ m --ch.n ~ ~~itma~-•- ~.-'tiY1~4 I Fm~ci tium~ nocd - Flmd , ~ - - nccoun'ins 6er RoutOlice Pn~ ~ere rl Lahb Div d Lobby ~ - West Elevation South Elevation Courtyard Courtyai-d ~ Va0 ~ o Nav~lnu~ ~~1 ~''~Q~~~~ ~auuQ~ e~ ~~c~~i~c~o~~ ZEo--~ REN nNO nssocinTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado 5cale: I"= 50'-0° ~.Mw - ~Mm - 1M'' ~ November 23, 1999 ~.tabM 11)~ AYVy ~itMN~O ~I W ~ 1l1 O~IN1All) lN1~fIqNflOtl eC:':t~~r.~-- - - - - • -'.._'-'-.-•-rry~P~WFB 0h:"Airrc'-•- 0h~mrt-- - - - - - - - - 06°t~°kre•- - - - -n.-:~n`t~9k0 $kit'~M,°Sars•-- - - 4 -•-a~'fdt!:30 0M-5 ima•- ? ? . _ _ .Mt!($ 0 - . _ . _ . Ff?$F0 - - - - North Elevation East Elevation ~ Club Club cm6 aA - , Ftwd tm«i ft~i~~ .N~, $F°n'et~a^-- • --n•~A7?3~~ ~ Luading Area U Ui~ J . ~4¢W$ Aetail ~ ~ Aeuil West Elevation Soutl-i Elevation G ~ r-u ' ~ T ~E o-~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 D ~ Maza ~ I~ t~,o 0 0 o ~i g Uc~va~ooo~ s nNO ASSOCIA7ES, iNC. Vail, Colorado November23,1999 Scale:t"=50'-0" ~.6qX 11)~ AW1~ (YIlfY1~Dp ~~lp mn~or~uaar i~xM--..tio.o ~ ~ Clnb - d Ciub Club CIv6 $ Club T:Jii:~: Chlb Ho;cl CIUL ~ ...Ftalrl ' -Q:M Ho~cl - Hurcl ~ y~~~ Club Ilnlel'-' .~J ~ n'., . }lafcl kiohl "v ~ ('lub 17otCl .--Lw~a ~MIMI . . Resmwent Luadiug -0bi`~ 1lca~- - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - • --ir.~~SeP+O - - . Spe B.11 rnnm ,I ~ .mm SPn P-,knvt North Elevation East Elevatiun , Courtyard , Courtyard ~ ciun cros 1. . c~un ~{i:i~ll)•.~r- ~ Cliib ttmd ISlL27 Club H-l CIuL 4k~Smar- . • _ -.,.-n.W,'ttik8~0 $~m4rr~~-~ - - - - - -r~y?8~0 Ei l-- -mi -~'~9lHk0 Iio«< Hotel Hotel «MO '~~I ~Aird^-' . D•rveli~b~ ~ 5[nLL[ R[SfEllfplll ~ ~ \/Vest Elevafiion Soutli Elevation Courtyard Cuuolyat-d ~ ~ Z E ~-l R E N Va~ 0 ~ Naza'---bte4 [~a.uo~~luu~~ ~c~~o~u~~ nNO nssocinTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado ~uc~mwva - n~wM~c . 1- AWi, i~rr~~oa November 23, 1999 Scale: ~.0.10M QR(]I~DO It{SO m IomfHm~~ ~nae~ur..~J~o I I I? ~ i 0 _ ~ - ~ i Gateway Bullding ~ ' - - " Vall Plaza Hotel - Building A Vail Vfllage inn !'hase V Village Road Elevalion - - _ m ~ m ~ e - - ~ ~ m• ~ u e ~ m - o BnA o B Vail Village Inn I- Phase III Vail Plaza Hotel ' - Building B Gateway Bullding North Frontage Road Elevation 0 ~ Nam ~ ~ Ea~ REN V~1~ 7L' loite~ ~ ~treet Sect0on5 nNO ASSOCUTES, uNc. , Vail, Colorado Mnrrtcnv , n.wHU+c. nanina Scelc: 1"= 50'-0" Novembef23, 1999 tn nraMou-~ -rian7au.~m - - ~ ~ ~ ~ Q [17 CTI Club ~ E~ Club _ X F,~«~ o ? - I ~.""bY Vail Plaza Hotel Vail Village Inn - Building B Phase III Vail Plaza Hotel Buflding A Soutf) PIaZa Elevation r , - - ~ m i ~ Vail Viltage Inn Vafl Plaza Hotel Vail Plaza Hnlel Phase V 9u11ding A euilding e East !'laza Elevation ~ ° V~100 Naza 'n-'o t e O ~'o Naza Seccttoou~~ ~ E H R IE N Vaif, Co{orado AND ASSOCIATES, IlJC. ~ Scale:l"=SO'-0" I November 23, 1999 RIfA1MfUV) I/aOnAN~SOtl - ' ' - - ~ ~ ~~•y' ~ .~„~„~v~'~ ~~d s~ c,,~~~,~~~y~' _ ~ e~ S ` ~ ~l ~ \ ~ ~ !•tu~i \ . D ' ~ T~~_ \ \ 1•m~~~~ 6 ~ \ \ \ 7 O \ ~ 6 ' '~fD \ ~ I.In~fY ~•]If) 1'L))~ ~ ` 1•'jt _ . \ \ 1'I~O)l. " \ ~ ~ I ~ \ ~ ~ 1•Yt~ t~ ~ _ I lle`I ~ '11I1 ~ \ \ \ \ v \ \ ~ ` \ 21- ~ ••mt $ \ ~ c ~ - ~ - r::~ \ ~ - 13UIldltlg }3\ ~ 1• . " _ ~ ` _ _ ~ ~ ~ i i•~~~~ ~ ~ •"a \5 G \ ~ ,L _ ~ -d - ' ~ ` ni~n, ~ ~ _ - i ~,i i•n.i - _ .-r! .ri~~ / _ _ _ i iw,r ` \ • ~ _ _ _ - - ' ~frl- ~ I~li 1 y ~ 1' 1'll~ift 1• i>) 111ff ^ ~ ` v ~ ' .(•I~A.aI ~ - _ ~e. G ~ ~ \ \ - C) - ~ ef) . ~ ~ ~ ~ C .I•` / ~ .fii..• _ _ ~iu._ _ ' ~ \ - ~ ` _ ~ ~ •ien ~-n~r_ - - __l•n f~ _ _ - - « ' ~ ms f-~{ \ `-~..~T Li?:il~~ ~ i ~ ~•i ~ O ~ . Z E o--~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~~1z~1 Hot~~ i [~~oo~~loD~,~ fF-~c~o I~t ~'D~to~ 1i nr,~ nssocinTES, ir,c. Vaii, Colorado Absolute Heigli ~~amn" Interpolated Contotus ^`°KCO1DfADO ^•tO November 23, 1999 me>mwaar rn~nrmrwiaeo . Sr.dle: l°=SUr_0° - ~ a \ ~ • ~ : , , Tv \X 'N' ~ e ae~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ \ ~.~o~ii ~ • ~ m \ Q~~-n ' ~ \ ' _=f-, _ ` ~ ~ ~•im.~i ~ ~ _ 1...,~ \ , n~~..n ~ i ' ~ Bung \ ~ 'r \ \ I•i~.fl ~ 6 - j~~~ ' I•lEJ'1 \ ~ \ \ \ - ~ - n ~ _ -a ' j ~ S \ 1•~a ~ ~ - ` _ t~flil _ _ _ R ~.b i i \ \ ~ ~ i.~i.n) ~eat : ~n~.~ •rinei \ ~ \ ~ \ _ - - ~ ~f---/ ~-~f .i•n~,~ ~ - - ? ~ - ~ _ ~ - ~ _-lylvl •I•1!~ t'1 ' ~ _ _ _ _ \ \ ~ ~ ~'~,,y~(~ n'7~~.i _ c•,n.. i .ncsS - - ru~i ~r~ ~ , - - - - - vn~~ ~ f ` _ ~ - - - - ~.un•~_ ' ~ ~ ~~•ieri --rie~ ~ J~uu _ _ ~ ~ r• ..r _ _ ~~~.r ~ 1. ' ~n~.~ \ r~H.~ r ~ /nl•1~1' ~ ` ` •(•I6f~~~_ ~f'~l.r - ' - ~ 1.~]) ~ ~ / ~ _ - ~ _ _ ~.If~'1~ 1'If)1• ~ - ~~~Y ~ ~ (•11~~- _-_l i~~ ~ ~ . ~I.~~ni~ ~ ~ . ~ . e.o». - r• ~ ~ ~--r,~r-r-}=1i,., . - - ~ /J ~ . ~ V~1o 0~ Haza ~cte~ iiB~ao~~luu~g ~(lc~ug6~t (~0an 2 AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Vaii, Colorado Maximum Heigh?AbovF rrade ""O"°"" - """"1N0'1NR1O1tl November 23, 1999 Interpola[ed Contours eawt nn evnN, oanuw nuo 5ca1e: 1"= SO'-pu m en+wmn rwiera+w~ad ; , - u~ l L_J I__ITL-J I____l te&_ ~ - ~ C(l[~? ~ ~ - L `'Ue~vn~ 11~•.il` ' . - . . iJ J ~ ~ P0Ol SP,CIIOIl B-B uiM. r cm~~~~ c - ~ UP .Q1c.cL?Pd~_. - ' ' ' OW •••n ! Cnmmvn /un~p:r. NS A, ~ercl~l ~ I 3commnnoni.nirn,9s ~ ~m ~nmim.. ni ~ . , . . Pool Sectioti C-C iT,,,,m !„mP,~,ais ~ ~i•~o~a U 4Nok('-l,n - .~LF~L.OJH ~ 1 ~:w~. IT~mmy o~~w~n+7y _ uo~~u~ ii~7•. ~ - . - r-Mm rW I. \I 1 mmYJ~ rer nl ~ ow J pll LozL ~ -~~,.~„~~4 •.s-~ - - - . - - . _ . - • - - - a ~ ~ i Pool Section GC DD n,^\~~~ ~ Lctl91L _ , - - - . Pool 5ection L-E Pool Section A-A ~ o Maza ZEo-~REN V~10~ote~ ~ nNO nssoanTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado NK]TL'CTl1f - MANNNG . IMGRIItf November 23, 1999 merne~~m~r rnxrM«sw.o - - l , ~ ~ - i i i i ~ . i ~ , i ~ _ _ L ~ _J - ~ ~ - - - ~ 1 - I ~ ~ • ..:;,.~..--1.,.. , , ,l ~ ~ I I ~ • - - - - - --"°r-- v - - - - ZZ) ~ L J, - " Crz y ' „ ` \ - - , ; " Mf ~ Ln66y I ,i Reslaurani Launge 1 ~ e . Lobby r II A .v_~ __"-_•-1~ ~ _II ~ - o o°a0U0o°~ Rcwit (j I Thrce Open `C~ U 00 ~ I ~ Ha ti4 ~is nh n° U~00() I I I , Vai I Road 5outh Frontage Road ~ V° ~ Z E o--~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~ Nam r~otC~~ iZt~~rcet (~u~t~.Sttu~loc~~ AND NSSOCIATES, INC, udll, Colorado nwnenuu . nueaa • unnnou Scale: 1"= 40'-0 November 23, 1999 r.o.lox iv~ nVwL [Otwnoo ntm 1AlIh7Mf0~5) tAf1~fR~W:pp , , . . , , . - ; ~ , , ; • - , - . . , - - - ~ - - ~ - ~ , - _ . . , - . _ _ • - _ - . - - ~ - ~ ~w _ . . ' _ _ . , - . _ , - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - - F~.. . ; ~ . _ _.3 . ~ i'~.. ~i ~ , . . - . c~'•,~no -A- . ~~~~z~ ~ ~ ~ ~'j"'"~ ~ s^ ~"i~.~ ~ . ~ ` , . . ~ i ~ 6 ._......,~_._.,,,.M...._ i~ I L " Eia1ai~~z~~~G~ .r~F ~~'~t}q kM4 . • ~ i ti ` ~ ~ ~ r ~ia~L.i ~ V I ~ i P'IXF~ ~ ~ j ~~4 GradiugPlan 35' Straightbody/50'Articulated 19'-6" Sport Utility Veiiicle v_ , , _ ~ ~ - , _ - . - - . . . ~ _ - - - : x W-_ i ~z w' .r• L ~ ~"~~'`lr~'.<~` `'I'~"~-~. ~ viy~'T~ i> ,.J.:.~..-~" Zl` ~ I ~ . , , ~ ~.i 1 N3:. , i : ~ Ct.. . . . . b . i rl ~m~xtiw:..:YWI~i ' , . ~ ! . . . . .J t)..1 ' 55' Sertiitrailer 45' Coach Z_ E H R E N ~ ANO LS^oCAT^^5c Vail Plaza Ho1:el Loading and llelivery Plan Vail, ColoraHo ~ November23,1999 - - _ - i EE ~ , December 21 Decemher 21 10:U0 a.rn, December 21 December 21 10:00 a.m. 2:00 P.M. 2:00 p.rn. V1/inter Solstice ~ ~ - March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23 March 21/Septem6er 23 March 21/5eptem6er 23 10:00 a.m. t 0:Q0 a.m. 2:00 . P.rn 2:00 p.m. Spring/Fall Equinox ~ - ~ Decernber 21 , December 21 june 21 June 21 12:00 noon 12:00 noon ' 12;00 noon 12:00 noon VVinter Solstice aumrner 5c715tice VaH Naza Hote~ ~a.qo~ ~tUdy Z E'H R E N AND n55UP.lATES, IIJC. Vail, Colorado Scale:l"=80'-0" ~ec~ . ~m - i.O DO% I1)I AVOfj Novem6er 23, 1999 (SIIOMiq IIlIO ' 7RORIMfC]f> (A%~f~H410p c r' A'" _ ~ ~ ~ - o _ I ~ Four Story o V?A %aza ~ Notel ~ w Twa Story ~ ~ ~ tloliday ~ House I Street Sectiari A . ~ ~ Average S-et6ack Three and Four Story Areas rn!~ ~arY C B A 7hree Story Vail Plaza r- r r- Noll&Y , ~toftl Hovse SCCe@t $ECt10n $ ~ I a o Four Story I ` Three 5 Holiday Yail PIa ~ . Flotcl - . ~ ( ~ Average 5etback ~ ~ Three and Four Story Areas Street Section C ~ ~ ~ j ~ z e a-o R E N ~1~ Q Na1 i otd M Setlback Study a I ANo &McUTes, INC, Vail, Colorado scale: t'=4o'-0^ ~ I ~ •+w~"~•~ NoYenlbet 13, 1999 ~n~o[ lA ~ 1 ~ . _ " _ . 4IL TOWN O. Department of Communi2y DevelopmenL :'S South Frontage Road Vail, Calorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-24511 Q O MEMOIZANDUM , D To: Town of Vail Desioa Review Board From: Communit_y Deveiopment Departrnent Date: Decembe: 1, 1999 _ Re: Vail P1aza Hote] -Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council In anticipation of appearing before the Vail Town Cotmcil for first reading of an amending ordinance to allow for the redevelopment of Pbase N of the Vaii Village Inn Special Development District, the applicant has requested a pre?iminary recommendation from the Design Review Board. ~ R:rsuant to the Town Code, in part, "no person shall building construction or demolition within the corporate iimits of the Toum unless desim approval has been granied in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code." - Should the Desim Review Board choose to make a prelimu7ary recommendation of approval to the Vaii Town Council on tbe redevelopment proposal ior the Vaii Plaza Hotel, staff would subgest ±hac the follawing imding and conditions be made pari of the recorrunendation: "Upon the preliminary review and consideration ot the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the.Board finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structttres, the hoteI's surrotwdings and with Vail's environment. The Board furtl7er finds that che proposal is in compliance wiih the aoplicable provisions of the Desio-n Guidelines prescribed in T:tle 12, Chapier 11 of :he Town Code and the Vail Village IYlaster Plan & tirban Desion Considerations. 'Iherefore; the Board recornmends approval of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. T?ie Board's recommendation of approval carries with it the following conditions: 1. That the appiicani submiis a final Iandscape plan, final off-site ir*mprovements pl•an, and outdoor livhtinL, plan in accordance with the provisions presc:ibed in the Zoning P.egulat:ons for review and approval offthe Design P.eview Bourcl. 2. Tnat the applicant suomits a final esterior builciing materials list and calor rendering for review and approval of the Desi!m Review Boara. 3. '?~hat the applicant submits a comnrehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. 4. Tha± the applicant submits a roof-top mechanicai plan prior t o the issuance or a builciing pe:r.ut. All rooi= top mechanical eauupment shaii be encloszd and screened from public view. RECYCLEDPAPER ~ Attachment R ~ ` u ' ~y ~ TflWN OF Y'AIL ~ Departmenl of Community Development 75 South Frantage Raad ' Vail, Colorado 81657 - 970-479-2I38 ~ O FAX 970-479-2452 Q O f MEMORANDUM O D To: Town.of Vail Design Review Board From: Community Development Department Date: December 1,1999 Re: Vail Plaza Hotei - Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council In aniicipation of appear.ing before the Vail Town Council for first reading of an amending ordinance to allow for the redevelopment af Phase N of the Vail Village Inn Special Development District, the applicant has requested a preliminary recammendation from the Design Review Board. Pursuaui to the Town Code, in part, "no person shall building construction or demolition within the corporate limits of the Town unless design approval has been granted in aecordance with Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code." , Should the Design Review Board clioose to make a preliminary r.ecommendation of approval to the Vail Town , Council on the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, staff would suggest that the foilowing finding and conditions be made part of the recorrunendation: "Upon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the Board finds r,hat the Vail P1a7a Hotel will be compatible with esisting structures, the botel's stirroundings and with Vai]'s environment. The Board further tinds that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the llesign Guidelines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plan & Urban Desigu Cansiderations. Therefore, the $oard recommends approval of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. Ttze Board's recommendation of approval carries with ii the following conditions: 1. That the applicant submits a final landscape plan, final off-site .improvements plan, and outdoor lig6ting pian in accordance with the provisions prescribed in the Zoning Regulatians for review and approval of the Design Review Board. 2. That the applicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and approval of the DeSign Review Board. 3. That the applicant submits a comprehensive sign probram proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. 4. That the applicant submits a roof-top mechanical plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof- tcp meckianical equipment shall be enclosed and screened from public view. ~ RECYCLEDPAPER r • Attachkent L ylemorandum To: George Ruther, Senior Special Projects Planner From: Gree, Hall, Director of Public Works and Transportation Date: December 9, 1999 Subject: Vail Plaza Hotel - Review of the November 23, 1999 Plans I have completed my review of the Vail Plaza Hotel and have the following comments and concems. Some of these are truly comments, which should be corrected as the project prog-esses through the development process, and others are concems or conditions, which shall be taken care of at the appropriate times in the process. Required Plan Corrections ? The scale stated on the site illustrative plan is incorrect, please label correctly. ? Sheet-Level Minus Two, ihe elevation of the ramp from above proceeding to the 6% grade at the lowest level is not 145' as inciicated. 0 Provide the slope of the parking area in the lowest valet area and the location where the gades change from 128' to 130'. ? Please show ail access points and doorways to elevators and ballways. Specifically, access to the elevators in the Level Minus Two, this may cause valet spaces to be eliminated. Access to the small elevator lobby from the loading berth, and access from the loading berth to the freight elevators. The esact lbcation of the garage door into the Phase III parking structure. Show the staging area in front of the frei--ht elevator and how this may impact access to Phase III and the safety of those using the elevator. Show the location of the trash piclnip. ? The eastside curb alignment of Vail Road is shown per the survey. However, there appears to be one shot out of line, this causes a jog right at the hotel entry, which doesn't esist. T'he curb moves one foot at this location. ? The widths of Vail Road, the Soufli Frontage Road and East Meadow Drive along with the exact locations of the curbs of the roundabout and median islands and opposite side of the street will need to be shown accurately prior to first reading before the Town Council. . Issues for Discussion There has been sigiiificant discussion with regards to whether a left-turu lane is required on Vaii Road. The hotel location as it is presently desi~.med would not have to move if the desire for a let`t-tum is there. A . pedestrian easement would be required to push ihe walk east to make room for the additional 12' lane. V irtually all of the landscaping on the east side of the road would be lost. A space of 3' to 11' wide as you go nonb would esist on the south building and the space would be 8' to 15' along the north building. The need for a left-turn lane was specifically reviewed and evaluaterl by the traffic consulting firm of Felsburo, Holt & TJllevig. In the Traffic Report prepared by the consulting engineer; the engineer has' stated that based upon tr~c projections, vehicles "backing up" into the roundabout traffic would not a:cur. A review of the roundabout desim with regards to Vail Road iraffic deternuned that at current volumes, there is a flow of 32 1 vehicles in the AM pealc hour with a capaciry to take 1501 vehicles and a maximum queue of 1 vehicle, in the PNI peak flow was 484 vehicles with a capacity to take 1423 vehicles and a maximurri queue of 2 vehicles. The roundaoout design allows for a 50°% increase in peak flows with the AIVI havin(y a peak hour flow of 481 vehicles wi[h capacity of 1172 vehicles with a ma:cimum queue of 2 vehicles. The PM peak flow would be 735 vehicles with a capacity of 1055 vehicles alid a masimum queue of 7 vehicles. This queue does not impact the enUy into this site. The Vail Plaza Hotel Traffic Report states the current northbound traffic volume of Vail Road is 695 vehicles. The added trips to Vail Roiid will be approximately 57 trips in and 40 trips out, during the peak PM period. They also analyzed that the trips were turning in against 900 vehicles verses the 735 trips. As ~ estimated in the future roundabout calculations. The second issue is that the loading bay requirements for the site were to accommodate the tuming I maneuvers of a 30' single axle truck, a 45' over the road coach and a 50-foot semi tractor trailer.on-site, and to additionally to allow a 65' semi tractor trailer to maneuver without impeciing the flow of traffic on the South F.rontage Road. The applicant has provided an access and maneuverability plan, which illustrates that the maneuvering of the vehicles takes place partially off-site, in the right-of-way. However, no backing motions occur across any sidewalks and the traffic flow on the South Frontage Road is not impeded. Extending the propos~-d South Frontage Road median through this access point.could solve the ~ question of the left turn out for the frontage road access. It would be desirable to at least provide a left turn pocket east bound somewhere in the frontage road to allow U-tums of passenger cars at a point that is determined appropriate. This is most likely at Village Center Chute. The landscape median would need to be extendecl the entire length to ensiu•e this takes place where determined. This entire access plan on the frontage road will require a Colorado Departrnent of Transportation revised access permit. The transpoi-tation enb neers at CDOT have the authority to decide how the access funetions. ReQuired Improvements and Conditions . ? The required improvements for this development are a 6' heated paver walkway from the east property line of the SDD to the Gateway Building. In addition any revisions to the curb will require new curb and gutter and modifications or additions to the storm sewer system. 'I1ie extension of Village-style street Iights is also requu•ed. Any necessary modifications to utilities, landscaping, irrigation systems and required retaining walls shall be the responsibility of the developer. The walkway will be delineated in pavers across the driveways behind the cross pans. ? Frontage Road landscape medians to include curb and a tter, concrete unit paver aprons, any masonry rock walls, plant material, bedding mix to TOV specifications, and irrigation system and water ' connections and sleeves. ? Improvements to Vail Road include a heated 8' paver walkway from the Gateway BuiIding property to East Ivleadow Drive. All additional improvements to allow, for this to take place as similarly as stated above for the frontage road are also the responsibility of the developer. ? In addition, adding curb, ;iirier and a o' concrete walk from the east property line of the SSD to and around the curb return of Village Center Chute on the South Frontage Road. Any modifications to the drainage system to accomplish this work are considered the requirement of the curb. Work such as retainnag walls and utility znodifications are the responsibility of the Town of Vail. o Details of ihe improvements from Vail Road to the west edge of the Phase I building (Base 1Vlountain Sports) along with the improvements of the bus stop along East Ivleadow Drive are as follows a heated paver walkway attached to the street and bus stop along with all modifications to drainage, utiliues, retaininQ wa11s, drainage systems, irrigation, landscape modifications street lighting and any adjacent property improvements impacted. ? The oran-e street lights esisting along ihe entire length of East Meadow Drive shall be changed to the ViilaQe-style street Lght fixiure. This instaliation shall be completed by the developer_ C A final ffading and drainage plan be nrepared and all drainage systems carrying runoff from public ~ight of ways require drainage easemenis. The tmal ~ading plan will have all ~ades to the tenth of a foot . ? A final landscape plan showing sivht distances, snow stora-e areas, and ail esisting vegetation ' impacted. ' ? The entire buildinq will require aouttering system, heat tape and piping to the storm sewer. ? That snow sheddin~ is addressed"for the entire building. - ??'he pedestrian walks along Vail Road and the other pedestrian mews are established as public pedestrian easements. ? Complete civil-engineered plans are revieweci and approved by the Town Engineer prior to submitting plans for the building permit. ? A11 one-way cross over lanes shall be 18' in width and all two-way cross over lanes shall be 24' in width. This affects approximately four compact and seven valet spaces. , ? The two-way drive aisle at the porte-cochere is only 20' in width between the columns. The valet spaces drawn ace only 16' in lengh. If full-size vatet spaces are established as required, the dh-ive lane width is further reduced down to.17'. To resolve the eonflict the parku7g spaces need to be removed. - ? Ttie slopes of the heated and enclosed drive aisle ramps are allowed to be a maximum grade of 16%. An engineered-stamped desiL 71 of the drive aisle is required prior to final DRB approval. 0 The three Phase V parking spaces south of the hotel are not practical. To enter the first to requires the driver to use the hotel porte-cochere as a roundabout. The one angled parking space, when drawn to the proper dimensions (9'x 19') reduces the drive aisle to the structure by 1'. This conflict could be , resolved by movinb the parking space closer to the Phase V building. However, the proposed 4 foot wide wa]k in this mew is then reduced to three feet in width wben adjusted. The reduced width is too narrow ne:ct to the building. The parking space desip must be revised. ? The curb returns into and out of the site will need to be revised to allow proper turning and nianeuvering. ? The south retum onto the site shall have a 15'radius. ? The north return out of the site shall have an 8' radius. ? The South Frontage Road exit shall be widened to accommodate the 65' semi tractor trailer. This requires an adjustment to both sides of the drive aisle and to the landscape island. ?'The brick paver sidewalk along Vail Road shall be 8' in width. ~ EA,S-T VILLAGE HO1_Y1EOWNERS ASSOCIA.TION, LNC. ~ Ofticers: President - Bob Galvin Secreary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm D'uectors - Judith Ee:koNvitz - Dolph Brdoewater - Ellie Cauikins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder To: Town of Vail - Town Council . From: Jim Lamont, EYecutive Director Date: December 7. 1999 RE: Vail Plaza Hotel Special Development District Amendment Proposal The Association's primary concerns with the proposal fall within tZVO jeneral categories. o Impact upon the public traffic circulation and Vail Village loading & delivery s_ystems. o Compliance with prior conditions of approval, Vail Village Master Plan, underiying zone district requirements, and the relationship with adjacent properties and improvements The following is recommended to provide sufficieat information to make an informed recommendation to the Town Council with respect to these prima.ry concerns. These reconnmendations will have consequences for setbacks, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, building heights, off site unpacts and related matters. 1. The Town of Vail should commission an analvsis bv a traffic-consultin firm to provide a second and indenendent opmion with respect to traffic circulation and safetv issues for the Main Vail roundabout Vail Road and the_South Frontaze Road. The analvsis should provide desian options to resolve traffic circulation and safetv issues resultina from increased densities approved for Vail Vxlla2e The South Frontage Road and Vail Road are critical vehicular links to Vail Village and its surrounding residential neighborhoods. Currently on Vail Road, during periods of high traffic, vehicles turning mto pnvate driveways can quickly cause the back up of north and southbound traffic. This circumstance causes particular concem for the consequences affecting the main Vail roundabout. Approving minimum building setbacks along Vail Road removes any firture option to xnake improvements to provide for an efficient and safe traffic flow as well as for an aesthetically )ealing presentation to the Vail Road corridor. Allowing large trucks, buses and cars eYiting the Phase I parldng .,ructure and the site's loading & delivery ternunal to excit by crossing against east bound traffic on the South Fxontage Road; near the east ezit of the Main Vail roundabout, creates the potential for an unnecessary tra.ffic hazatd. 2. An independent analvsis should be condncted to determine the size and-confturation of necessarv facilities to be orovided an the Vail Plaza Hotel site and methods of aopropriate compensadon requiretl to mitiaate off srte impacts upon the Vail tiillal4e loadmQ and dehverv svstem The growth in the visitor population due to increases in, (recently approved or under consideration) densities for Vaii Village and Lionshead will result in a greater demand upon the loading and delivery system for Vail Village. The zegative aspects of the current loading and delivery systezn are adverse to the economic and environmentai well being of Vail Village and its surroundi.ng residential neighborhoods. The mitigation of the cumulative e-f"tects from redevelopment -esulting from increases in the visitor population from the Vail Plaza Hotel and other similar properties is anticipated :hrough regulatory provisions providing for the mitigation of off site impacts upon the loading and delivery systern. 3, The intended interconnectnon between the Vail Plaza Hotel and the earlier phases of the Special Develotament Distnct, of the parlana structures noints of access and circulation routes alona with accompanvina 'epairs and imnrovements shoula be reauired or adequate measures to mitiaate the resultinQ effects should be )rovided bv the applicant and confirmed bv an independent consnltant The lack of the interconnection of interior circulation routes between earlier phases of the Special Development )istrict and the proposed Vail Plaza Hotel places an inappropriate and unnecessary burden upon traffic circulation on idjacent public nght-of-~,vays. Further, the canfiwration causes the unsuitabie mixing oftypes of vehicies, reducing the :fficiency and safe operation of on-site loading and delivery facilities. The interconnecuon of these routes and points of Lccess was anticipated and provided for in the design and construction of the earlie: phases. No agreements restrain or )reempt the Totivn from requirina these interconnections. 4. A summarv of comaiiance c:-iteria imoosed uoon earlier ')hases of the Suecial Develonment District and °port on the deareP of deviation anu the iustifica[ion thereof irom these c-iteria should be provided to the Town ancil. The complianc.- criteria, such as the view corridor defined in the initial Special Develapment District established br the site; we:e unposed upon the former.owners and adjacent property owne:s. The rational and crite:ia applied ±or the Post Office Boz 233 Vail, Colorado 81653 'I'e?ephone: (970) 327-3630 MessaggQ/F?X: (970) 327-5856 setting aside of the compliance criferia is a matter of fair, consistent, and equal treatment for former owneis, adjacent propetty owners and all propezty owners in similar circumstances. Compliance criteria include documeats and decisions with respect to various phases of the Special Devclopment District, the Vail Village Master Plan, the underlying zane district and callateral revuire.nents placed on adjacent properties. The documentation of changes and amendments to the Special Developmeni Districi has be-n regorte3. However, the deviation or negation of campliance criteria has not been justified aa to wanante3 changes in conditions, resutting effects, and the public purgose served. The Association has given testimony to the Planning and Environmental Commissian regarding the foregoing matters within the context of the work sessions they have conducted with respect to this item. As the authority to initiate ac2ion on several of these matters falls outside the jurisdiction of the Commission or staf~ they are presented to Council so as to respec: its nerd to give timely consideration to the concems raised by the Association It is respectfully suggested that because there are a sufficient number of new Town Council members, certain reports by consultants and staff with respect to this proposaJ should be presented and considered as a qualifier to fmalizmg the Council's advisory comments. The forme: Cauncil, due to the pending expiration of their terms, deznurred on mal:in& advisory comments, sesming to choose . instesd to forward the responsibility to the newIy elected Councii. The Association is prepared to give additional . supporting testimony with respect to these matters. ~ Vail Plaza Hote! Level 6 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Leve16 Gross Square Footage 8,044.00 Dwelline Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Dwelling Unit (upper level) 2,053.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Units Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 42 (lJpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 43 (Upper I.evel) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 44 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 45 (Upper Level) 648.00 108.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 47 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 48 (iJppet Levell 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Sub-Total Club 4,718.00 843.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 12.00 Corridor (public) 0.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Maid 0.00 Core (stair) 0.00 Mechanical (rooftop) 222.00 Sub-Total Area 372.00 Dwelling Unit Net 2,053.00 Club Unit Net 4,718.00 - Other Net =00 Total NM 7,143.00 NeUGross Difference 901.00 89% Page 1 Vail Plaza Hotel Level 5 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Level 5 Gross Square Footage 16,146.00 Dwelline Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Dwelling Unit (lower level) 3,446.00 340.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00 Club Units Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 34 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 35 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 36 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 37 (LJpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 39 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 42 (Lower Level) 913.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 43 (Lower Level) 979.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 44 (Lower Level) 486.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 45 (Lower L.evel) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 46 (F7at) 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 47 (Lower Level) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 48 (Lower L.evel) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club 9,801.00 735.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 32.00 Other Areas Area Corridor (public) 1,592.00 Core (elevator, mech. shaft) 151.00 Maid 0.00 Core stair 0.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 1,743.00 Dwelling Unit Net 3,446.00 Club Unit Net 9,801.00 Other Net 1,743.00 Total Net 14,990.00 Net/Gross Difference 1,156.00 93% Page 2 i + . . ! Vail Plaza Hotel Level 4 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 ~ Level4 I Gross Square Footage 26,763.00 Club Units Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 20 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 21 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 22 (Upper L.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 27 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 28 (Upper I.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 29 (Upper L.evel) 1,313.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 34 (Lower Level) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 35 (I.ower I.evel) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 36 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 37 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 38 (Flat) 984.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 39 (Lower L.evel) 980.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 40 (F7at) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 100 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2_00 2_00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club 14,390.00 1,215.00 25.00 21.00 3.00 48.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area Unit Type A 372.11 18.00 6,698.00 Other Areas Area Corridor (public) 2,912.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Maid 344.00 Core stair 269.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 3,675.00 Club Unit Net 14,390.00 Accommodation Net 6,698.00 Other Net 3.675.00 Totai Net 24,763.00 NeUGross Difference 2,000.00 93% Page 3 Vail Plaza Hotel Level 3 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/ 13/99 Level 3 Gross Square Footage 32,877.00 Club Units Unit e Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 17 (F7at) 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 20 (L.ower Level) 561.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 21 (Lower Level) 1,088.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 22 (Lower Levei) 995.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 23 (F7at) 991.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 24 (Flat) 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 27 (Lower L.evel) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 28 (Lower Level) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 29 (I.ower Level) 969.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club Uuits 16,163.00 1,400.00 30.00 23.00 7.00 60.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area Unit Type A 365.54 26.00 9,504.00 Other Areas Maid 342.00 Corridor (public) 4,359.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Core stair 360.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 5,211.00 Totals Club Net 16,163.00 Accommodation Net 9,504.00 Other Net 5.211.00 Total Net 30,878.00 NetlGross Difference 1,999.00 94% Page 4 i Vaii Plaza Hotel Leve12 Zehren and Associates, Inc. ~ 961070.00 12/13/99 ~ i Level2 j Gross Square Footage 37,857.00 Club Units Unit Tvpe Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 8(Flat) 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 11 (F'lat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 14 (Ffat) 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1.222.00 40_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club Uoits 13,966.00 1,235.00 27.00 17.00 10.00 54.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Ke s Total Area Unit Type A 364.59 34.00 12,396.00 Other Areas - Maid 344.00 Corridor (public) 4,342.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Core (stair) 367.00 Rooftop Deck 4.114.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 9,317.00 Totals Club Net 13,966.00 Accommodation Net 12,396.00 Other Net 9.317.00 Total Net 35,679.00 NebGross Difference 2,178.00 94% Page 5 Vail Plaza Hotel Level 1 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Level 1 Gross Square Footage 44,623.00 Club Units Unit Tvpe Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 3(Flat) 1.237.00 95_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club Uoits 3,822.00 319.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 14.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area Unit Type A 353.10 21.00 7,415.00 Retail Area Retail Three 605.00 Retail Four 0.00 Sub-Total Retail 605.00 Restaurant Area Occ. Factor Occunants Main Restaurant (Buffet) 2,155.00 18.00 119.72 Specialri Restaurant 1.718.00 25_00 68_72 Sub-Total Restaurant 3,873.00 188.44 Lounee Area Occ. Factor Occupants I.ounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 Other Areas Corridor (public) 5,795.00 Kitchen/Service 6,444.00 Truck Dock/Auto Circ. 10,501.00 Restrooms 589.00 Maid 192.00 Core (elevator) 275.00 Core stair 466.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 24,262.00 Totals Club Net 3,822.00 Accommodation Net 7,415.00 Retail Net 605.00 Restaurant Net 3,873.00 L.ounge Net 1,228.00 Other Net 24.262.00 Total Net Area 41,205.00 NeUGross Difference 3,418.00 92% Page 6 ~ Vail Plaza Hotel Leve10 Zehren and Associates, Inc. ~ 961070.00 12/13/99 Leve10 Gross Square Footage 51,428.00 Retail Retail One 1,702.00 Retail Two 1.740.00 Sub-Total Retail 3,442.00 Lobby Bar Area Occ. Fact. Occu . Lobby Baz 674.00 25.00 26.96 Lobby Area Occ. Fact. OcCUp• Lobby 2,237.00 30.00 74.57 Administration Front Desk 2,202.00 Accountine 1,570.00 Total Administration 3,772.00 Saa - Men's/Workout Men's Lockers/Facilities 3,019.00 Treatment 2,447.00 Deck 1,392.00 Exercise/Workout 1,686.00 Sub-Total Spa 8,544.00 Conference Area Occ. Factor Occuoants Main Ballroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93 Pre-convene 2.485.00 7.00 355.00 Sub-Total Conierence 9,489.00 Service Areas 6,318.00 Exterior Circulation Covered Ramp (North) 1,008.00 Covered Auto Entry (West) 5,772.00 Uncovered Entry (West) 1,696.00 Auto Ramp (South) 978.00 Pedestrian Access (East) 814.00 Total 10,273.00 Other Areas Restrooms 589.00 Core (elevator) 275.00 Core (Stair) 568.00 Corridor(Publicl 3,740.00 Totai Other Areas 5,172.00 Parkine Provided Valet Spaces 5.00 Page 7 ? ~ Vail Plaza Hotel Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 I Totals Retail Net 3,442.00 Sar Net 674.00 Lobby Net 2,237.00 Administration Net 3,772.00 Spa Net 8,544.00 Conference Net 9,489.00 Service Net 6,318.00 Exterior Circulation Net 10,273.00 Other Net 5.172.00 Total Net 49,921.00 NedGross Difference 1,507.00 97% Page 8 Vail Plaza Hotel Level -1 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Level Minus One Gross Square Footage 57,696.00 Spa Area Women's Lockers/Facilities 3,116.50 Treatment 2,853.00 Deck Area 6,266.00 ExerciselWorkout 1,246.00 Pool Area 2,774.00 Sub-Totaf Spa 16,255.50 Confereuce Area Occ. Factor Occuaants Breakout 3,364.00 15.00 224.27 Pre-canvene 2.485.00 7.Q0 355.00 Sub-Total Conference 5,849.00 Service 7,971.00 Other Areas Mechanical 0.00 Corridor(Public) 2,328.00 Core (elevator) 275.00 Core (stair) 568.00 Public Restrooms 589.00 Sub-Total 3,760.00 Parking Provided SDBCes Area Area/Soace Valet Spaces 7.00 Parking Spaces (Full Size) 41.00 Parkine Spaces (Compact) 11_00 Sub-Total Parldng 59.00 21,498.00 364 Totals Area Other Areas Net 3,760.00 Spa Net 16,255.50 Conference Net 5,849.00 Service Net 7,971.00 Parking and Ramp Net 21.498.00 Total Net 55,333.50 NeUGross Difference 2,362.50 96% Page 9 i ! Vail Plaza Hotel Level -Z Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 I Level Minus Two ~ Gross Square Footage 53,524.00 i I Other Areas Mechanical 0.00 Corridor (public) 225.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Core stair 285.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 660.00 Area Valet Spaces 125.00 Puking Spaces (Full Size) 65.00 Parkina Snaces (Compact) 2.00 Sub-Total Parldng 192.00 51,462.00 268.03 Totals Area Other Net 660.00 Parldng and Ramn Net 51.462.00 Total Net 52,122.00 NeUGross Difference 1,402.00 97% Page 10 Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Dw¢Ilin¢ Units Total Area Park. Factor Park. Rea'd Dwelling Unit 1 5,499.00 >2000 2.50 Club Units Total Area Factor Saaces Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 500Q000 2.00 Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 6(F7at) 1,193.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 500Q000 2.00 Club Unit 8(F7at) 948.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit I 1(Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Ciub Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1,222.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 500K2000 2.00 Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 1,351.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit21 (Two Level) 1,878.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 22 (Two Level) 1,785.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 23 (Flat) 1,983.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit24 (Flat) 1,108.00 500Q000 2.00 Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 27 (Two I.evel) 1,769.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 28 (Two Level) 1,769.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 2,282.00 >2000 2.50 Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 34 (Two L.evel) 1,327.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00 Club i7nit 37 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Uait 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 1,794.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 1,727.00 500<2000 2.00 Ciub Unit 43 (Two Level) 1,793.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 44 (Two [.evel) 1,300.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 45 (Two Level) 1,161.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 500<2000 2.00 Ciub Unit 47 (Two Level) 814.00 500Q000 2.00 Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 500Q000 2.00 Total Club Parldng 64,094.00 96.50 Page 11 Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/ 13/99 Accommodation Units Area Kevs S aces Factor Total Acc. Units 36,013.00 99.00 75.61 0.76 Restaurant Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Soaces Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44 1:8 seats 23.56 Lounee Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Soaces Total Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 1:8 seats 6.14 Retail Area Factor Suaces Total Retail 4,047.00 1:300 sq. ft. 13.49 Conference Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor S aces Main Ballroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93 1:16 seats** 29.18 Bteakout 3,364.00 15.00' 224.27 1:16 seats** 14.02 Total Required Saaces Total Dwelling Unit 2.50 Total Club 96.50 Total Accommodation 75.61 Total Restaurant 23.56 Total Lounge 6.14 Total Retaii 13.49 Conference 43.20 SDD Parldng Required (phases 1.2.3.5) 149.68 Sub-Total Parldng 410.67 Mixed Use Reduction {10%) -41.07 Total Parlung Reqaired 369.61 Total Parldng Provided 366.00 Parkeng Difference -3.61 ParkinQ Provided Full Size Compact vatet Total Existing SDD spaces to remain' 112 0 0 112 Level Zero Pazking 0 0 5 5 L,evel Minus One Pazking 41 11 7 59 Levei Minus Two Parkin¢ 65 0 125 190 Total Parlting Provided 218 11 137 366 Percentage 60% 3% 37% 100% * SDD Parldne Reauired (nhases1.2,3.5) Existing SDD Spaces 112 SDD Parking Deficit 75 Sub-Total (Current Requirement) 187 Previouly Applied Reduction- (2.5%) 191.68 Currently Dedicated Phase 4 Spaces -42 Total SDD Parldng Required (phases 1,2,3,5) 149.68 *"assume 50% internaUpublic transportation/pedestrian haffic - breakout use by ballroom occupants Page 12 I Vail Plaza Hotel Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 i i Dweiline Units Unner Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows Dwelling Unit 1. 2,053.00 3,446.00 5,499.00 340.00 4.00 4.00 10.00 Club Units UDDei Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 0.00 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 0.00 1,237.00 95.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 6(F'lat) 1,193.00 0.00 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 0.00 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 8(F7at) 948.00 0.00 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 0.00 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit i l(Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 0.00 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 0.00 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1,222.00 0.00 1,222.00 40.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 0.00 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 0.00 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 0.00 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 790.00 561.00 1,351.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club L}nit 21 (Two Level) 790.00 1,088.00 1,878.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 22 (Two Level) 790.00 995.00 1,785.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 23 (Flat) 991.00 0.00 1,983.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 24 (Flat) 1,108.00 0.00 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 0.00 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 27 (Two I.evel) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 28 (7'wo Level) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 1,313.00 969.00 2,282.00 147.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00 Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 0.00 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 34 (Two Leve]) 814.00 513.00 1,327.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Ciub Unit 37 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 814.00 980.00 1,794.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 814.00 913.00 1,727.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 43 (Two Level) 814.00 979.00 1,793.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 44 (Two L.evel) 814.00 486.00 1,300.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 45 (Two Level) 648.00 513.00 1,161.00 108.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 0.00 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 47 (Two Level) 814.00 992.00 1,806.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 992.00 1.806.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 48 Total Club Units 48,061.00 15,041.00 64,094.00 5,953.00 110.00 87.00 22.00 218.00 Page 13 Vail Plaza Hotel Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/ 13/99 ACCOmmodatlon UIIits Room Area Rooms Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows Total Acc. Units 363.77 99.00 36,013.00 0.00 99.00 99.00 0.00 198.00 Residential Totals 105,606.00 0.00 213.00 190.00 22.00 426.00 Restaurant Seatine Area Occ. Factor Seats Main Restaurant 2,155.00 18.00 119.72 Specialtv Restaurant 1.718.00 25_00 68_72 Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44 Lounee Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 Lobby Bar 674 25 26.96 Conference Facilites SeaNna Area Occ. Factor Seats Main Ballroom 7,004 15 467 Breakout 3,364 15 224 Pre-Convene 4,970 7 355 Total Convention 15,338 Sna Level Zero 8,544.00 Level Minus One 16 55.50 Total 24,799.50 Retail Retail One 1702 Retail Two 1740 Retail Three 605.00 Retail Four 0.00 Total Retail 4,047.00 Adminstration 3,772.00 - Page 14 Vail Plaza Hotel Area. SummarY Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 ' 12/13/99 - Pro¢ram Area Level -2 Level -1 Level 0 Level 1 Leve12 Level 3 Leve14 Leve15 Level 6 Total GrossArea 53,524.00 57,696.00 51,428.00 44,623.00 37,857.00 32,877.00 26,763.00 16,146A0 8,044.00 328,958.00 , Dwelling Unit , 3,446.00 2,053.00 5,499.00 ' Club Unit 3,822.00 13,966.00 16,163.00 14,390.00 9,801.00 4,718.00 62,860.00 AccommodationUnit 7,415.00 12,396.00 9,504.00 6,698.00 36,013.00 Retail 3,442.00 605.00 4,047.00 Lobby 2,237.00 2,237.00 Restaurant 3,873.00 3,873.00 IoungelBar 674.00 1,228.00 1,902.00 ' Conference 3,364.00 7,004.00 10,368.00 Pre-Conviene 2,485.00 2;485.00 4,970.00 Kitchen 0.00 Food and Bevetage 0.00 Front Office 2,202.00 2,202.00 Sales/Cater. (multi-use) 0.00 Accounting 1,570.00 1,570.00 Executive Office 0.00 - Receiving/Storage - 0.00 Personne] (office) 0.00 Service Areas 7,971.00 6,318A0 6,444.00 20,733.00 Iaundry 0.00 Housekeeping 0.00 , Engineering 0.00 Mechanical (Plant) 0.00 Mechanical (Rooftop) 117.00 222.00 339,00 Spa (Lockers) 3,116.50 3,019.00 6,135.50 1 Spa (Treatment) 2,853.00 2,447.00 5,300.00 Poo! I?, ck 5,2 55 . 0 C 1,392.0~ ' 1,558.00 Pool Area 2,774.00 2,774.00 Exercise Roams 1,246.00 1,686.00 2,932.00 Carridor(public) 225.40 2,328.00 3,740.00 5,795.00 4,342.00 4,359.00 2,912.00 1,592.00 0.00 25,293.00 , . Cortidor (service) 0.00 Core (elwator) 150.00 275.00 215.00 275.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 151.00 150.00 1,726.00 Core (stair) 285.00 568.00 568.00 466.00 367.00 360.00 269.00 0.00 0.00 1,883.00 . Parking(spaces,ramp) 51,462.00 21,498.00 10,273.00 4,114.00 87,347.00 Club Unit Storage Area 0•00 Restrooms/CoatslEtc. 589.00 589.00 589.00 1,767.00 ' Laading Dock 10,501.00 10,501.00 Service Srorage 0.00 Maid (Satellite) 0_00 0.00 0.00 192.00 344.00 342.00 344.00 0.00 0.00 • l.aza.oo Sub-Total Net Areas 52,122.00 55,450.50 49,921.00 41,205.00 35,679.00 30,878.00 24,763.00 14,990.00 7,143.00 312,151.50 Cttoss-Net (wall) Area 1,402.00 2,245.50 1,507.00 3,418.00 2,178.00 1,999.00 2,000.00 1,156.00 901.00 16,806.50 Gross-Net FaCtor 97°/a 96% 97% 92% 94% 94% 93% 93% . 89°/a 95% ~ e Page l5 , . ' ~ , ~ - - - _ Attachitent J . . _ . _ . - - M j TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Vail Plaza Hotel Prepared for: Zehreri & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1976 Avon, CO 81620 Client Contzict: Mr. Timothy R. Losa Prepared by: Felsburg Hoit & Ullevig Greenwood Corporate Plaza 7951 E. Maplewood Avenue, Suite 200 Engiewood, CO 80111 303/721-1440 Engineer: Hoily A. Hefner . Project Engineer: Chris J. Fasching, P.E. FHU Reference No. 98-174 September, 1998 - f, TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa4e - I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................1 A. Land Use,-Site and Study area Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B. Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. PROJECTED.TRAFFIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 A. Trip Generation and Design'Houriy Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 B. Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 C. Year 2015 Projected Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 III. YEAR 2015 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 A. 8ackground Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 • B. Total Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 APPENDIX A - TRAFFIC COUNTS ~ APPENDIX B- EXISTlNG CONDITIONS LOS . APPENDIX C- YEAR 2015 BACKGROUND COND(TIONS LOS APPENDIX D- YEAR 2015 TOTAL CONDITIONS LOS ' " - i LtST OF FIGURES PaQe 1 . Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Site Plan . . . . . . . . .................................3 3. tstimated Existing Winter Cond'itions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 _ 4. Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6. Year 2015 Background Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 _ 7. Year 2015 Total Traffic Conditions . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ' LIST OF TABLES 1. Existing Trip Generation Estimal:es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 2. Proposed Trip Generation Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 ~ - ~ - - _ - - . ~ - 1. INTRODUCTION A. Land Use, Site and Study area Boundaiies Zehren and Associates, Inc. is proposing the Vail Piaza Hotef development to be located on the southeast corner of Vai! Road and the South Frontage Road in Vail, Colorado. This development will be replacing three existing buildings with one building. The site location is shown in =igure 1. The existing three buifdings consist of a total of 41,643 square teet. The proposed deevelopment will consist of a total of approximately 150,000 square feet of various uses including accommodation units, a restaurant, a lounge, a spa, and retail spac•e: The proposed development will have one main access onto the South Frontage Road. The main access will serve as the entrance to the four level parking garage. A second access.east of the main access, will be used for most deliveries. The site plan is shown in Figure 2. The impacts of the project traffic at the site access points and the roundabout south of I-70 are presented in this report. The purpose of this report is to address the projected traffic impacts associated with the Vail Plaza Hotel development proposal, and to identify any roadway or traffic control improvements required as a result of these impacts. B. Existing Conditions . The existing conditions in the vicinity of the project site are illustrated in Figure 3. Currently there are two accesses to Vail Plaza Hotel site. The main access is on the South Frontage Road and the second access is on Vail Road. The South Frontage Road runs east/west through Vail with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH adjacent to the site. Vail Road runs north/south from the roundabout intersection with the Frontage Road providing access to several hotels. Vai! Road is primarily used for local access south of Vail Plaza Hotel. The roundabout is located approximately 115 feet west of the main entrance to Vail Plaza Fiotel. Most of the site traffic currentfy uses the roundabout as does traffic oriented to/from .I-70. Since Vail is a ski resort, winter traffic volumes have typically been higher than summer volumes. Traffic counts were cotiected during the week of August 17, 1998, and these counts were used to estimate winter numbers based on 1990 data collected during the winter and summer. The estimated existing winter traffic voiumes for the study area are shown in Figure 3(the raw count data are shown in Appendix A). As indicated, the South Frontage Road east of the roundabout carries approximately 3000 vehicies during the winter PM peak - hour. The volumes at the two accesses were calcufated by estimatin-c trip generation for the existing buildings. . ~ ~ FELSI3U[t(:, t I U L"f' 6c ULLEVIC I-70 Fronta e Aoad J ;I ~ , 733 r, a ~ , i ; ~ Figure 1 ~ - North Vicinity Map Vsil Plasa Holel 98• 174 8/21/88 , I . FELSI3URC 110 L T & ULLEVIG i Frontage Road I . , ~ - - ~ - - - , ~ - - - ~ ~ : - ~ _ - ' - , - - - _ ~ , ~'j! 1 ! l. ' ~ , ; I~ I I i ~ ; 11~ . o I ROD Q~ J~~ ~ r I I • ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ V > ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ II ~ 1 ~ I I v ~ - _ . ,.~~1....1....~1_..I. . ~ ~ I....I._. I ` ` I I ~ ~ .GO'11 ~ 1 l-1 ~I~ ~J 1'u ~ ~{8~N - o 0 l I ` r ~ . Figure 2 Site Plan North , Vdi Plus Hotel 98•174 0/21/98 ~ : Ss;x ~ i 44 { . . U4i ~ FELSBURG (4110L,r & ULLEViG N ~ w ~ • ~ 610 ~ 2r2o 625 ~ JL • ~ l( . A (overall roundabout LOS) .~1120 1785 ' -4- 1785 F- 10 I ~ 1225-3. - 1315 ~ ; ` N co I A ~ s & A ~ n I.~ ; a ( '1 13 ~ +y . , ~ ~ w LEGEND XXX = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volurnes Figure 3 a( = PM Peak Hour Level of Service `n Estimated Existing Winter Conditions Q -A-- = stop Sign " (MarCh 1998) ~ North Vell Plezo Hotel 08-174 9126/98 44 ~ . .,e: - . _ ' ~ The total peak hour traffic volumes were used as the basis for subsequent LOS (levels of service) computatians, the results of which are summarized in Figure 3(worksheets are shown in Appendix C) as is the intersection lane geometrics. Level of service is a qualitative measure which describes traffic operations. A letter designation ranging from A to F is used as the measure. A LOS A is indicative of excellent ;-affic operations with very little delay and no - congestion, whiie a LOS F represents extreme delay and signiTicant congestion. As shown in Figure 4 the left turn onto ihe South Frontage Road from the main site access currently operates at a LOS F during the PM peak hour. The left turn into the site from the South Frontage Road currently operates at a LOS C during the. PM peak hour. All other ~ . movements operate at a LOS B or better during the PM peak hour. The minor movements to/from the second access along Vail Road currently operate at a LOS B or better during the PM peak hour. The roundabout currentiy operates at an overall LOS A. 5 ~ FELSIlUR(; (41-10LI" & ULLEVIG 10% `c20'c oA/y~ i ~ i ~ ~ I ' i i ~ t i I ' . 30% ? ' 25%,i i i , . ~ , . i ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Figure 4 0 ~ Trip Distribution North v.u Pi.:. Hmei ee• 174 IVzs/ae II. PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation and Design Hourly Volumes Trip generation equations, as documented in Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Sixth Edition, 1997 were used to estimate the vehicle-trips generated by ihe _ existing and proposed development. It was assumed that 50 percent of the traffic to/from the restaurant, lounge, and specialty retail comes from outside while the other 50 percent is internal (as such, the trip generation associated with these uses was reduced 50 percent). Table 1 summarizes the trip generation results -with existing conditions. Table 1 Existing Trip Generation Estimates , Land Use - =-AM Peak Hour:' PM Peak Hour Weekday , > Buitdin - ]TE , Type- :Gode . Size . Unit In Out Total In Out :Total] In Out Total Condo/ 230 22 Rooms 3 7 10 7 5 12 64 64 128 Townhouse Hotel 310 58 Rooms 20 12 32 19 17 36 239 239 478 Restaurant 831 2 1,000's 1 0 1 5 2 7 43 43 86 Sq. Ft. Drinking ` 836 1 1,000's 0 0 0 3 1 4 13 13 26 Sq. Ft. Market 852 2 1,000's 16 17 33 F6 15 31 162 162 324 Sq. Ft. . I Totals I 39 37 76 50 40 90 521 52 i i na~ ' Daily Drinking Total from 7 5% of PM Rates As shown in Table i, the site currently generates approximately 1050 trips per day. The AM and PM peak hour trip generation is estimated to be approximatefy 75 and 90 trips, respectively. TaDle 2 summarizes the trip generation results for the proposed development. As shown, the proposed development is estimated to generate approximately'3100 trips per day. The AM and PM peak hour trip generation is estimated to be approximately 175 and 260 trios respectively. App-oximately three times as many trips are projected 'for the proposed development as compared to the existing uses on the site. 7 a - - Table 2 Proposed Trip Generation Estimates Land Use,AM Peak Hour PEE I Weekday . Buifding. ITE . Tyne Code Size tJnit - in Out Total fn In Out Total Condo/ 230 16 1ooms 2 5 7 5 4 9 47 47 94 Townhouse Hotel 310 276 Roams 95 60 155 ~ 89 79 168 1] 36 1 136 2272 ' Restaurant 831 9 1,000's 3 1 4 22 I 12 34 201 201 402 , . Sq. Ft. I Drinking * 836 4 I 1,000's C) 0 0 14 7 21 69 69 138 Sq. Ft. lty 814 9 1,000's c~ 6 11 14 14 28 87 g7 174 Sq. Ft. ECenter - Totals 104 73 176 144 115 259 1541 1541 3081 ` Daily Drinking Total from 15% of PM Rates B. Trip Distribution The trip distribution estimates used in this analysis are shown in Figur-e 4. These percentages are based upon the existing traffic data previously presented (Figure 3). As shown, approximately 70 percent of the total site traffic is expected to be oriented to and from the west through the roundabout. Site generated iraffic was assigned to the adjacent roadway network per these distribution patterns and are shown in Figure 5. C. Year 2015 Projected Traffic Vo/umes Background Traffic Analysis of traffic impacts for a year 2015 scenario requires projecting background traffic volumes. The projected background traffic was a result of exponentially increasing the volumes by two percent per year. Year 2015 backgcound traffic volumes and operational _ conditions are shown in Figure 6. Tota! Traffic The total year 2015 traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. These vofumes were determined by first removing existing site traffic then adding the site generated traffic to the year 2015 background trafsic volumes. As shown, the Frontage Road is projected to carry approximately 4600 vehicles during the PM peak hour in 2015. Trips attributable to the proposed Vail Pfaza Hotef would comprise approximately 6 percent of the total, . 8 . FELSDURC ~ (OHOLT & ULLEVIG, I ~ • w ~ r2 0 ~88 ,'--44 36 , r 100-4-~ co w i "Ln 61 . ~ . i ~ ~ ~ , . ; LEGEND I X(X = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ~ Figure 5 0 ~ Site Traffic Assignment - Norih ~ Vdl PI.:. HWN 99-171 0/2810e . , . i ~ FL-LSI3URG i (411OL'F & I ULLEVIc; ; i I I i I ~ . I ~ ~ N ' 8SS ~ t 29, 8~ 5~, ~ ~ D (overall roundabout LOS) 2510 ~ 1850 2~~--• ~ L, ? / r ~ ~i i i LEGEND XXX = PM Peak HourTrattic Volumes Figure 6~ ~ X = PM Peak Hour Level of Service Y8a r 2015 1, ~ 0 . Background Traffic Conditions j; North i • Vall Pleze Hotd 88•171 9/26188 3 . r•ELsBuizc rillOLT & ULLEVIG I ~ . ~ - E o f I D (overall roundabout LOS) i i ?1~gy ~--2570 2570 i j-- 44 ~ 1870 ~ g0~-? ' 1790-? ~ . ~ , oo --1 1( ~ w a ~ ~ ) 13 O ; 13 B I;- r i I , . ~ . ; ~ LEGEND XXX = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes = PM Peak Hour Level of Service - = Figure 7 Stop Sign ~ Year 2015 0 Total Traffic Conditions North n _ Vdl Plaaa Nolel 98•174 9/11198 ,I jI~ . III. YEAR 2015 TRAFF{C OPE:RATIONS A. Background Traffic The peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 6 were used as the basis for subsequent levels of service computations, _and the results are also summarized in Figure 6(WOrksheets are shown in Appendix C). The roundabout wili operate at an overall LOS D. However, the only movements that are fower than LOS B would be the south approach and right lane east approach. These movements are projected to operate at LOS C and F respectively. The LOS F from the east movement is a resuit of the high amount of volume turning to the north toward _ I-70 and the North Frontage Road. , B. Total Traffic The totaf peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 7 were used as the basis for subsequent - levels of service computations, and the resufts are also summarized in Figure 7(worksheets are shown in Appendix D). All movements on the roundabout will operate at the same LOS as the background traffic showed previously with the exception of the south approach which will operate at a LOS D. The left turning movement into the site (at the main entrance) will operate at a LOS E and the left turning movement out of the site will operate at a LOS F. Site generated traffic consists of approximately 1.2 percent of the total traffic entering the roundabout. Of the right lane east approach the contribution from site generated traffic is approximately 2 percent. No improvements were used on the roundabout for this analyses. The main access onto the South Frontage Road included two roadway improvements in the analyses: ? Provide a"storage" area in the existing median for site outbound left turning vehicles to safely pass eastbound traffic. A raised island already exists in the median from the roundabout to the site access providing separation between eastbound and westbound traffic. Minor modifications would need to be made to the island to provide for a storage area. With this "safe harbor," left turning vehicles could cross eastbound traffic in one maneuver and waii: in the storage area prior to merging into westbound - traffic. With the addition of the storage area the ieft turn movements out of the site would still remain at a LOS F, however, the defay time for this movement is improved significantly (more than 25 - ? Construct a right turn deceleration lane into the site for eastbound traffic. This tane is needed to remove right turns from thru traffic lanes. This is of importance here because vehicles coming out of the roundabout do not have sufficient reaction time in the 115 foot distance to slow or stop for a right turning vehicle. 12 Limiting movements to right in/right out or three-quarter movement was considered for the site's main access. This would require -that vehicles exiting the site desiring to use the Vail Road intersection with I-70 (which is most of the site traffic) make a U-turn somewhere along the South Frontage Road. However, there is not a safe place for vehicles to make a U-turn within a reasonable distance. Therefore, it is recommended to improve the main access so as to accommodate full movement as safely as possibte which includes a center "harbor" area and a right turn deceleration lane. The second access onto the site from the South Frontage Road will be used for de4iveries. Due to space Iimitations on site, trucks will need to back up onto the site from the Frontage Road. This snould be done from a separate lane along the south side of the road. The existing right turn lane east of the site should be extended west to the site's deiivery access. The design of the fane and driveway should accommodate backing trucks to allow no interference with eastbound though traffic. Physical or barrier sepGration should be incorporated into the design. ' 13 , IV. CONCLUSlONS AND RECC)MMENDATIONS The following highlight the significant fundings and recommendations as a result of this traffic analysis: ? The total projected trips consist of subtracting the existing 1042 trips from the proposed 3082 site generated trips. ? Two roadway improvemants will be necessary at the main access onto the Frontage Road. The first includes modiTication to the center median to provide a storage area for vehicles turning left out of the site. This wifl allow for a two-step left turn with less detay. The second is an exclusive right turn lane into the site for eastbound traffic. This exclusive right turn lane will remove turning traffic from the though trafTic ianes thereby improving safety characteristics. _ ? The roundabout will not be advErsely affected by the proposed site traffic. The site traffic will consist of approximat:ely one percent of the total traffic in the roundabout in year 2015. ? The auxiliary lane east of the site for right turning vehicles needs to be extended west to the second access. This lane will be used for defivery trucks backing into the site. This tane and the de(ivery driveway in which it will serve should be designed to allow backing activity without impactirig the eastbound through traffic. Physical separation should be considered between the through lane and the auxiliary lane where backing would be taking place. ' 14 . - - - . _ . , APPENDIX A TRAFF9C COUNTS P .,01 ' post~t` Fax N ote 7672 No.-a PaW--'l 70* S T~ 70 - h , L From ~ Lomto^ ~ , l Loartw Dr.Y C.'arge V FIX 0 Teleorone o Fai / Tetmme i ~~mY ~ RNUm ~ GaA for uaup ~ COUNAER MEA5URE5, INC. ~ Site'Code ~ 3 ) PA6E: 1 ? N-S Street! MAIN VAtI ROUND-ABOUi / FILE: VAIL E-W 5 eet_ _ • Direction: Oir 1 DA1E; 8/11/98 - - - TIME iOTAI I100N I100N 170 VAIIN VAILN VAILS VAILS EFRON EFRON 41fRDN WFRON - BEGIk CLASSIfIED SLIP RDABT OFL ON Or'F ON OFF ON OFF Ok aFF 1:00 PM 454 14 62 48 103 133 10 73 1I1 155 122 51 1:15 945 18 61 33 103 :53 fl' 84 145 151 82 79 1:30 1009 15 68 38 43 156 103 1D5 114 116 133 63 1:45 910 14 69 44 98 151 SE 61 139 120 106 68 HR TOiAI 3926 61 261 163 391 599 346 329 520 542 443 267 2:00 PM 928 5 47 49 89 159 11 72 154 111 103 68 2:15 819 25 6D 40 11 129 65 42 110 116 304 66 2:30 945 8 59 47 102 134 66 68 149 140 92 78 2:15 959 IB 64 40 86 144 89 86 152 113 94 68 HR TO1Al 3651 16 230 176 319 511 293 268 565 480 393 280 OA1' TOTAi 7519 107 191 339 146 1110 639 591 1085 1022 836 541 PERCENT of TOTAL 1.1 6.5 4.5 9.8 15.4 8.4 7.9 14.3 13.5 11.0 7,2 N N ~ . o ~ 5 ~ w ~ ¢ 4 ~ O ri H 6 ~ m '?a T - 70 m ~ m ~ m ~ m O M r1 I-V V.J o I ~ ~t l ~ ~ < l ~o~~' $ ~r 10 D V ; n ~ n.. ~ ~ ~ 4ct ~ - ~ m -4 [7 01 ` ~ t ~ ¢ , , , , , ,~....,Y,,~ - - ' APPENDIX B EXISTING CONDITIONS LOS HCS: Unsigna'_ized =-Le_s°ctio^s P.elease 2_1g _ACCZ.HCC C°nz?r :o_' MiC:OCOmplizeTS .'dnSDOri:aL=O.^. Ufi1V°r51tV 0= tiC:ida 512 We11 r.al'_ vd2P.eSV:_!°, FL 32611-2063, D=^-; (904) 392-0378 _ St-r=sts: (N-5) Va__ Road (E~ -W) A-~oss 2 Major SL-eet Direczior.... NS Length of Time Ar:_=_vz=_d... 15 (Min) G ' VS L . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' ' . . . . HAH' Daz-_ Analysis.......... 6/25/98 Othe_ I:.Tormatio;:......... ?eak Hour Existing . '?'wo-way Stop-cor_rol:e' Intersection ~ ~ Northbouzd ~ Southbound ~ Eastbounc ~ W=stbound I L - R I L - 7 R IL 1 R ~ L T R . Nc. ianes ~ C 0 ~op/Yi~ld ~ ~i 0 > 1 0 Ni 0 0 Q i 0 > 0 < 0 S Volumes ~ 695 11 ic 530 1 11 p;rF I .75 .9S1 .95 .95 I ~ .95 _95 Grade ~ 0 I 0 I I 0 Mc' s (o) ; I I I sU/Rv's (o)I I i I cv1s (o) ; I I ? PCE'S ~ I 11.10 ~ 1=.10 1.10 Adjustmer.t Factors Vehirlc C'r 1t1C31 FOIIOW-llD MaP.°1Ve'_" C'dD (tg) T1P•1° (tL) - - Le'~_ Tu= Majo-r Rcau 5.00 2.10 ?icht Turn Mincr Roa,-,z 5.50 2.60 ':nrougn Tra-=ic Mino= Road 6.00 3_30 Leit Turr. Mincr Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: U.^.s:g:!aIized Z::tersec-ions Rel;,as= 2.1g ?1CC2.HCC page 2 . Wcrkshee_ =or Tt"TJ2 Izt-=rsec='_on Step 1: R"' i:rom M_ncr S_Y°ez GT3 E3 _ Cor.fl?c_inc rlows: (v--h) 732 PotenLial Capacity: (pcDhj 589 Mov2menz Capacit-v: (pcph) 589 P:ob. of Queue-r'r°e Sz-Gz=: 0.98 . S=_p- 2: i: from Nlajo= S:I-2et SB hn ' Cor.il;ct_ng Flows: (vph) 733 Poter.tial Capacity: (pcpz) 767 _ Movem=nt Caaacity: (pcph) 767 _ P=ob. of Queue-rree Szate: 0.98 Tii Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 _ RT Satu=ation Flow Rat°: (pCphDl) Major LT Shared Lan=_ Prcb. of Queue-Free Sta*_=_: 0.57 Step 4: LT from Mincr St_ee* WB E3 Conflicting Flows: (vnh) 1306 • Potentia' Capacity: (pcph) 186 Major LT, Minor TH Impeciance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance ractor; 0.97 Capacity Adjustmer_t Factor due to Impeciing Moveme^ts 0,97 . Movemzr.t Capaci=y: (acph) 180 _ntersection Performance Summarv • P_vg : 9 5 0 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Car . Cap Delay Length Delav Movement (pcph) (ocph) (pcnn)(sec/v2n) (veh) (sec/veh) - Y73 L 1 18 0> ~ 507 7.3 0.0 B 7.3 WB R 13 58° > SB L :17 767 4.6 0,0 A 0.1 1P.z°rsection De1ay = 0.1 sec/veh ~ T ar ; D` ~ n^ ~3yo 1 ~ 'r:CS: Unsi~alizec-- nte_s t ons leasa _ 2__J A~~.2.ciCC J - ' Center For Micro=ompute_s Ir: _ranspo_-a-inz TJr_=v=rs i t-v e= Flo= i::a 5512 W=*__ =a_1 Gainesvi'_i" _711 3261I-2063 Pn: (904) 392-0376 Sr-_e°ts: (N-S) Main AccesS (E-W) Sou*_h Frontag= Ro3d Najor Stree*_ D_rec--ion EW Leng_h c- Time Anal.yzed... 15 (min) Analyst 'r :.-)d?;e O: A,alysis........... 8i25/98 0the= lP._c=m3t-io^ . . . . - • - - . Ped!c fiou= EXiSti*lC Two-wav Szoz)-conzrc llec In:.ersection ~ 7astbound ~ Westbounci j Nort!vbound ~ South7ound _ I L ' R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R - i---- ----I---- No. LaPeS ~ o a< o ~ i 3 0 ~1 o i ~ o 0 0 Stop/Yield ~ Ni NJ I vo,1m°S ( 1205 251 io 1795 1 zo 81 Dt=~ ~ .95 . 9-cl .95 .95 1 .95 .951 Grade ~ 0 f 0 1 0 1 McIs ca> ? I I i su/Rv's (o)~ ! I I cv,s (o) ~ i ! I DcE'S I 11•10 11.10 1.101 . Adjustmznt Factors V2hicie Critical Follow-uD Maneuver GaP (t5) Time (tf) Left Tur:, Major Road 5.50 2.10 Rig'.^.t T::=P. MiP.o= P.Odd 5.50 2.60 Through Tra__ic Mizor Road 6.50 ~ 3.30 Le=: ^urn Mino_ Road 7.00 3.40 iiCS: Unsignaliz=_d Inte:sec=ions Release 2..1g ACC2.?iC0 Dage 2 ' j1To1'kSileat _o= TWSC _Il_°rSZczio_^. i 5tep 1: RT irOm M,inO± 5treet NB S3 Conflicting Flows: (wn) 647 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 551 - Movem=nt Caaacity: (pcph) 651 Pr'ob_ o= Queue-=r=e Stace: 0.99 St°p 2: "LT i_O[i1 MajoZ' StTeet W$ Eg . Conflictiag Flows: (vph) 1294 F0t2P_tlal Capacity: (pcph) 346 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 345 Prob. of Queuc-Free State: 0_97 - Step 4: LT from Minor StI'e2t N$ gg • Conflicting F1ows: (vph) 3171 Potential CaUacity: (pcph) ip Majcr LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0_97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0,97 ~ Capacity Adjustment r^actor du2 to Imneding Movements 0.97 Mov2ment Capacity: (pcph) 10 Inte=s2ctien Pe«ormance Summarv Avg. 950 Flow Move Sharza Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh). (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 23 10 ~ 2.4 F 951.2 NB R 5 051 5.5 0.0 B WB L 12 346 10.8 0.0 C 0.1 int2rsection Delay = 8.8 sec/veR ~ T^e calculated value was greater tnan 999.9. . i . - - ARRB Transport Research Ltd - SIDRA 5.11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - relsburg Holt 6 Ullevig 13 Registered User No. 1234 - Time and Date of Analysis ~ 9:12 P*~*_, Aug 25,1998 Va_1 Plaza Hotel * ROUND * Existing Conditions Intersection No.: SIDRA US Hignwzy Capacity Mar.ual (1994) Vnrsior. - Roundabout _ t R'JN INr ORMATION ; Basic Parameters: ' •Inte=section Twe: Roundabout ' D=iving on the right-hand side of the rc>ad SIDRA US Hignway Capacity Manual (1994) Version Input data specified in US units Default Values File No. 11 ` Pea}: flow neriod (for performance) : 30 minutes Unit time (for volumes):120 minutes (Total Flow Period) Delay definition: Overall delay, Geometric delay included Delay formula: Highway Capacity I~`,anuai Level of Service based on: Delay (HCM) Queue definition: BacK o£ queue, 95th Percentile Jail Plaza Hotel * ROUND * Existing Conditions Intersection No.: Roundabout Pable S.3 - INTERSECTION PARAM_,TERS Degree of saturation (highest) = 0.656 Practical Spare Capacity (lowest) = 30 $ Total vehicle £low (veh/h) = 3134 " Total vehicle capacity, all lanes (veh/h) = 9503 Average intersection delay (s) = 4.1 Largest-average movement deiay (S) = 6.3 Largest back of weue, 95% (ft) = 162 - Periormance ?ndex = 148.5$ Total fuel (ga/h) = 102.0 Total cost - 1237.29 - Intersection Level of Service = A Worst movement Level of Service = A Vail Plaza Hotel ROiJND * * Er.isting Conditions :ntersectior. No. : Roundabout 'able S.6 - INTERSECTION PER ORMANCc Total Total Aver. ?rop. Eff. Per£. Aver. Flow Delay Delay Queued Stoo Index SDee3 ;veh/h) (veh-h/h)(sec) Rate (mph) 3134 3.57 4.1 0.576 0.61 148.58 14.6 IT, ~ - . -7ai1 Plaza Hotel * ROLJN*J * Existing Conditions - Intersection Na.: Roundabout _ Pable 5.10 - MOVEMENT CAPACITY AND pERFORMANCE SUMMArZY Mov Mov P_rv Total Lane Deg. Aver. Eff. 95% Perf. -No. Tyn F1ow Cap. Util Satn Delay Stop Back o- Index (veh (veh Rate Queue /h) /h) M x (sec) (veh) qest: West An-.)roach 12 L 355 1016 100 0.349 2.9 0.52 2.1 16.93 ~ 11 T 304 1280 68 0.237 3.4 0.52 1.2 14.21 13 R 74 312 68 0.237 3.5 0.56 2.2 3.34 .3outn: South ATaAroacn 32 L 81 251. 100 0.323 6.2 0,69 1.7 4.10 31 T 2.03 629 100 0.323 6.1 0.68 1.7 9.78 33 R 102 326 100 0.323 5.9 0.70 1_7 4.81 East: East Anmroach 22 L 107 383 43 0.279 4.9 0.66 1.4 5.18 21 T 254 908 43 0_280 4.5 0.59 1.4 11.97 23 R 634 966 100 0.656* 6.3 0.98 6.5 31.49 ,7ortii : North Anproac-h 42 L 374 1-134 100 0.362 1.6 0.='9 1.8 17.17 41 T 91 283 69 0.322 2.0 0.3"0 1.5 4.04 43 R 216 673 89 0.321 2.0 0.37 1.5 9.33 NorthWest: North West Approach , 82 L 146 625 100 0.234 3.6 0.57 1:1 7,17 _ 81 T 121 518 100 0.234 4.0 0.57 1.1 5.73 - 83 R 72 308 100 0.234 4.1 0.62 1.1 3.32 * Maximum de.^zee of saturation Vai1 Plaza Hotel * ROUND * xisting Conditions .atersection No.: Rounciabou t Table 5.15 - CAPA:IT1' AND I,EVEL OF SERVICE (HCM STYLE) Mov M-ov Total Total Deg. Aver. LOS No. Typ x'low Cap, of Delay (veh (veh Satn /h) /h)_ (v/c) (sec) r7est: West ADaraach 12 L 355 1016 0.349 2,9 A 11 T 304 1290 0.237 3.9 A 13 R 74 312 0.237 3.5 A 733 2608 0.349 3.2 A ~ ~c_t h: Sou:h r.pP=08Ch L E1 251 0.323 6.' A 31 T 203 629 0.323 6.= A „ , . 3 R 102 " 316 0.323 5. 9 A - - - • ' - - - - 386 1196 0.323 6.0 A , -Last : :ast Approa.^_h 22 L 107 383 0.279 4.9 P. 21 T 254 908 0.260 4.5 A 23 R 634 966 0.656* 6.3 A ~ 995 2257 0.650 :5.7 A Vorth: Nor t.1: Aaproach - 42 L 374 1034 0. 35-- 1.6 A 41 T 91 283 0.322 1.0 A 43 R 216 673 0.321 1.0 A ~ 681 1990 0.362' 1.8 A NcrthWesz: Nor;h West Approach 82 L 146 625 0.234 3.6 A 81 T 121 518 0.234 4.0 A 83 R 72 •308 0.234 4.1 A 339 1451 0.234 3.8 A ALL VEHICI.ES: 3134 9503 0.656 4.1 A _TNTERSECTION: 3134 9503 0.656 4.1 A Level oF Service calculations are based on average overall delay (HCM criteria), ' independent of the current delay defi:nition used. For the criteria, refer to the "Level of Service" tonic in the SIDRA Output Guide or the Outnut section of the on-line help. * Maximum v/c ratio, or cri a cal green periods End of SIDRA (Jutnut . APPENUIX C YFAR 2015 BACKGROUND COND(TIONS LOS --=...a ~ wcaeda~.~a - ..,_uah 7.11 ' ..'iF, - , Felsburg Holt & UZlevig 13 Registered User No. 1234 ~Time and Date of Analysis 9:10 AM_, Aug 26,1998 /aii Plaza Hote1 * BACK * '~'utt:re Cona=t_ons Intersection No.: SIDRA L'S Eighwav Capacity N',a-iual (1994) VEa=sion , Roundanout rZUN INFORMATION . ~'Basic Paramete=s: - Intersection Type: Roundabout ' ~Driving on the right-hand side o-F the-road - SiDRA US Highway Capacity Manual (1994) Version Ir.put data specified in US units Default Values File No. 11 . reak flow period (for perfo_*mance): 30 minutes Unit time (for volumes):120 minutes (Total Flow ?e=iod) Delay de-'ir.ition: Overall delay, Geometric delav included Delay iormula: Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service based on: Delay (HGM) Queue de£inition: Back of aueue, 95th Percentile - Tail Plaza Hotel * HACK * vuture Conditions Intersectzon No.: Roundabout Cable S.3 - INTERSECTION PARAMETERS , Degree of saturation (nighest) = 1.181 . Practical Spare Capacity (lowest) - _28 ~ Tota1 vehicle flow (veh/h) = 4391 Total vehicle capacity, all lanes (veh/h) = 7313 Ave=age intersection delay (s) = 55.1 Largest average movement delay (s) = 183.1 Laraest back of crueue, 95$ (ft) = 2630 Per£ormance Index = 366.41 Tota1 fuel (ga/h) _ 177.7 motal cost = 2267.37 . Intersection Level oP Service = D Worst movement Level of Service = F Vail Plaza Hotel * SACK } Future Conditions Cntersection No.: Roundabout i-able S.6 -.INTERSECTION PERFORMp.NCE Total Total Aver. Prop. E-~:. PerF. P_ver Fiow Delay Delay Queued Stop Inde:x Sfleed (v_'r./h) (ven-n/h)(sec) Rate (mph) . 4391 55.04 55.04 45.1 0.764 3.02 366.41 11.5 , _ _ Jail Plaza Hotel . * BACK * - . Future Conditions ~ . :ntersection No.: ' RoundabouL 'able S. 10 - MOVE2-=-NT CADACITY .r,ND PER OR*SANCE 5UIj2PLRY Mov Mov Psv Totai Lane Deg. Aver. Eff. 95$ Perf. -'.No. Typ Flow Cap. Util Sa`n Delay Stop Back of Index (veh (veh ~ Rate Queue /h) M x (sec) (veh) Iest: West Anvroach 12 I, -197 822 100 0.605 7.6 1.04 6.0 26.87 . 11 T 426 1016 69 0.419 6.7 0.80 2.7 21.45 13 R 104 248 69 0.419 6.8 0.82 2.7 5.06 south: South Approach 32 L 1.14 137• 100 0.832 31.4 1.96 10.4 8.68 31 T 284 341 100 0.833 30.1 2.01 11.6 20.82 _ 33 R 143 172 100 0.831 29.0 2.05 11.6 10.27 °,ast: East Apr . 22 L 307 41 0.489 9.4 0_96 3.3 7.97 21 T 729 41 0.488 9.0 0.92 3.3 18.50 23 Fc 868 752 100 1.181* 183.110.95 105.2 175.94 iort.h: North An-Droach 42 L 524 916 100 0.572 3.3 0.64 3.9 25.85 41 T 128 251 89 0.510 3.6 0.61 3.1 6.05 43 R 303 594 89 0.510 3.6 0.64 3.1 13.90 NorthWest: Nortti West Approach 82 L 204 443 100 0.460 8.0 0.90 2.9 10.99 81 T 269 367 100 0.460 8.9 0.90 2.9 8.86 83 R 101 219 100 0.461 9.3 0.93 2.8 5_18 _ * Maximum degree of saturation "ail _:aza Hotel * HACK * 'uture Conditions ..ntersection No.: Roundabout Table -c!.15 - CAPACITY AND Z,EVEL OF SERVICE (HCM STYI.E) Mov Mov Total Total Deg. Aver. LOS No. '!`yv F1ow Cap. of Delay (veh (veh Satn /h) /n) (v/c) (sec) West: West Approacn 12 L 497 822 0.605 7.5 B 11 T 426 1016 0.419 6.7 B 13 R 104 248 0.419 0,8 t3 1027 2086 0.505 7,2 B 5outh: -:outh Apnroach 32 L 114 137 0.832 31.4 C 31 T 284 341 0.633 30.1 C j . . 33 R 143 172 - --0. 831----.-_29.0 _C s 541 650 0.833 30.1 C tast: East An-oroach 22 L 150 307 0.489 9,4 B 21 T 356 729 0.488 9.0 B 23 R 888 752 1.181* 18_!.1 r 1394 1788 1.18? 119.9 c vo= ;h : No= Lh A=aroac't: _ 42 L 524 916 0.572 3.3 A + ~41 T 126 251 0.510 3.6 A 43 R 303 594 0.510 3.6 A 95n~ 1761 0.572 3.4 A 'dor*.hWes* : Nortt: West Annroac'r. 82 L 204 443 0.400 6.0 B 81 T 169 367 0.460 8.9 B 83 R 101 .219 0.451 9.3 B 474 1029 0.461 8.6 B -ALL VEHICLES: 4391 7313 1.181 45_1 D -INTERSECTION: 4391 7313 1.181 45.1 D Level of Service calculations are basEad on average overall delay (HCM criteria), independent or the current delay defiiiiotion used. For the criteria, reFer to the "Level of Service" topic in :.ne SIDRA Outnut Guide or the Output section of the on-line help. * Maximum v/c ratio, or critical green periods Enc3 of SIDRA Output , ~ - ~ - - . . . _ _ - ? APPENGIX D YEAR 2015 TOTAL COND(T10NS LOS - 7c-5: U^S1c-Z8l1Zed iIIte=3?CL'_OnS Releas° 2.15 C . H - ~ p~~> > _ C°nt=r ^o~- Micro_cmpu--e=s In Transnc=;:-=tior. u'i:iv_I'S_tv O- -_orid? - 5 12 W~i? Gainesv__ic, FI, 3251-1-2083 (904) 372-0376 _ .SCT_'°2z5 : (N-S) Md__^. ACC°SS (G-tiVT) SOL' ti _ :0:1; 3Qe RO2.C Majo= St_eet Direct_on.... EW ~ Length c= T_me Az~lvzec__. 15- (min) Analvst................... HAN Date o= Analysis.......... 6%25!98 • 0t:-~-r In=crrnatior.......... Deak Hour Y°a= 2025 Twe-way S-Lop-ccnt_ei_ed Izrersection- . i ^dS=tJOll.^.C I W25tbOllL1d I IVOT'ti'1DOL'17C1 ~ 5outrbound I L - R L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R I---- No. Lar.=s ~ 0 2 < 0 3 0 ~ 1 D 1 ~ 0 0 0 - stoo!Yield ~ NI N4 i Volumes ( 7-790 1001 44 2570 1 83 35; p::g ~ .95 .951 .95 .95 1 -9~; •951 _ GraQ° ~ 0 1 0 I 0 j MC'S (o) ~ I I I ~ su/RV's (a)~ I I i ,-v' S (o) ~ I I ! pcE, I s ~ 11.1e 11.10 1.101 Adjustm=nt racLOrs Venicle C=itiCaI r^oliow-ur) I`13n2LVe= GcD (t-g) Time (tf) ?efC TuL':1 Ma]C?- ROc'..^-. 5.50 2.10 Rict7L Tu=n Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through "ra=ffic Mir.or Roac 5.5 0 3.30 LerC Tu:=, N~:~cr Road 7.00 3.40 ' :1^..1.. V1 $i anai~Zad TT:I.ei.Se.r.1..10n$ Rel: aSe 2. ~ TcL.'`....Iq c V C2^=°_ YC= M=C?"OCORIDIli.°rS ~-i: irZ:15==za_=C;; J:.iversi=v a= ~lo_ida 5 _2 W_i_ ??a' I Ga_n=svil1°, _L 326:_-2063 °h: (904) 3:2-0378 Scree=s: (N-S) Main Access (-W) South Frontage 2oa^ M3]O_ ."~.t-°°L D=r°^.~lOI7.... rW y Le::g~-_`_ of '"ime Analyzed... 15 (miZ) A:-lalys _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-U~'r_ ~ Dat° of Ar:alysis........... 8j25/98 Otzer Ir_formation......... Peak Hour Year 2015 `rW0-WaV .S'LJ^-'coP.z=OIi2Q TiiteiSeCLlOi: ~ East-bound ~ Westbound j Northbound ; South:ound ~ L _ R ~ L T R ~ L T R j L T R Ne. Lanes j 0 0 0 ~ 0 3 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 1 - S*_cp/y; ei d ~ NJ N J I Volumes 2570 ~ I 83 •95 .95 Grad-= j j Q I ~ 0 M^Is (o) ~ I I I sU/RV's (o)I I I I cvIs ' °CE's 1.10 ~ Adjustment Factors ' V°h'-clz C-ritical Follow-up Maneuv=r Gan (tg) Time (t-f) . Lef: Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Ri=t Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Th_ough T=afiic Mir.c: Road 6.50 3.3n Left Turn MinoY Roa3 7.00 3.40 , . - - - - . ' HCS: Unsignalize3 Intersections ReI_as= 2.I_ ACCA.ri;.0 o~g= , • - Can:e_ .or N;icrocompute_S =:i _r3715DO::a_ion UII1ve: S itV Of F10*_'1Qd 512 We_l Ha?1 Gainesvill°, FL 32611-2083 ph: (gpc) 392-0379 Streezs: (N-S) Main Acc°ss (E-W) Soutr ?rontage Roac Ma7°r 5==eet Direc=ion..._ EW - Ler.c--n cf Time AS131VZ2:... 15 (mir) IzI1GlVJ = . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !"7k:a Daze of Analysis.......... 8j25/9E . p*_:!e._ In=o_maz:on......... Peak Heu= Y=_:a: 201-5 Twe-way Ston-con*_rclied lIIt2i52CL1or_~ y ~~as~bound I Westbound ~ IvcY_t-bound ~ Southboun_.d ~ L T R + L T R ~ L T R ~ L T P. _ No. Lznes ( o a 1 ~ 1 0 0 ~ i o i ~ o 0 0 _ stoA/Yield ~ NJ NI I VD1L'fR°_S ~ 1790 1-00 1 aa 1 83 351 .95 .951 .95 5=: .951 Grade ~ 0 1 p I p I NCIs !a> ~ I I 1 su!Rv,s co>~ Iv's (o) I i i I PCE' S i 11•1o 11.10 :.101 ~ Adjustment Factors Criticai Follow-uz Mar.euver CJap (tg) Time (t=) - L=:t ^urn Majer Road 55.50 2.10 Rignt TL_n Mincr Road 5.50 2.60 Througn T_-a=:ic Mir:or Road 5.50 3.30 Lef'C 1L'::": Mlricr Roac 7.00 3.40 , vl:$ : i.T.^_51:~;1aliZ°CI T_ilz°TSEC' _ _ ~'_O^S R?l°~..S° 2. 1•r~~+ a , g 4..~A._. ;~~..••n ?aa_ 2 • Wor;csne=t for Tn1SC Tnz=rsect'_on S_ep -v_ -rom Miac= 57--reer NB SB Cor.=_i:._ir.= Flows. (vp:,) 942 POL°nz1di CaDcC.1`V: (DCDP.) aE)l Mov=mer.t Capac'_ty: (pcph) 451 Prob. cf Qu:ue-F_=e 5tate: 0.91 JL°J Z_ :ei _.rJiT: Md)^_ Stl"2°t 4VB :B . :.oaflictin3 F1ows: (v--'r:) 1989 ?otential CapaC_ty: (pCph) 147 Mov-ament Capacity: (pcph) 147 . P--ob. of Queue-:=ee State: 0.65 . Jz°D C: JT fT_'OTtI M1I10- Si.r°2t N$ SB Cor:=lic:ing Flows: (vnh) 1530 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 62 Majo= LT, Mir.or TH Impedance Factor: 0.65 Adjusted Imp=dance Factor: 0.65 • Capac?ty Acjustm2nt Factor due to Imaecing Movements 0.55 Uovem?nt Capac:ry: (pcph) ap In_ersecz:ion Performance Summary , Avg. 950 F:iow Mcve 5nared Tota1 Queue Approach Ra?---e Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay ~ Movemer.r- (pcph) (pcph; (pcphJ (sec/veh) (ve'r.) (sec/-veh) ~ NS L ?0 845.2 8.4 . 599.2 N= R 41 461 8.6 0.2 3 w? L 5= 147 37.0 1.3 ~ 37.0 "nte_section De'_ay = 3-5.2 sec/veh - - - ~ ,y - - hCS. Ur_signal_z°d Ir.*_~e_seczions Re1ease 2-15 A&CC.:iCO Pag- - Z . 1h'cr.:j::-c Z TTr:JC je:=r i ..:i jtep r=' f_or: N:_:ZGr S:"ee_ N3 S3 _ ~o::flict:nc = lows: (ti-ph; 99~ Pozentia? Caz~ac_ty: (pcph) 43= rnoveme^-_ C3pac; rV: (pcpn) c3g L=ob. c= Q;:e.::e-?re= Sta_~ . 0.91 S-=p._. :.T «om ti3jo: Street W= :3 ~ _or:_1_ctinc Flows: (tiY;^_) i.989 °otenti-=l Capccitt•: (p=h) 147 Mov=me*1t Capaz:_Zy: ;pcp: ) 147 Prob. of: QU°llz-Fre° State: 0.65 Step 4: L'=' =-om MinOr Screet NB SB Con=lictinq :1ows: (i-pn) 4688 Pc::e:.tial Capacity: (pcph) 1 Majo= LT, Minor T'r. Impedance Factcr: 0.65 Adjusted impedance r^a=.or: 0.65 ~ Capacity Adjustment caczor due tc Imoeding Movements 0.65 Movement Capac_ty: (pcpn) , Int'rs=ctior. Performance Summary Avg. 55%~ Fiow Move Shared Total Queue .Approacn Raze Cap Cap Dslay Length LOS Delay rnc_.em`;-lL (Pc4;-,) (proil) (pcph) (sec/veh) - (veh) (sec/veh) nr- L 90 ' F NB P. 1~1 434 5.2 0.2 B ~ bG3 L 147 37 . 0 1.3 E 0.6 Intersecticn Delay = 993_3 secjveh *':h° calcula:_d valua was g_eater than 999,9. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .lail Plaza Hotel - t ~,1 * ~ Euture Condi.tians • . ~jitersectior_ No. : Roundabout :able S. 10 - NT CADAC=TY ?ND pgRFpgMANCE gUMMpgy Mov Mov PYsr Tota? Lane Deg. Aver. Eff. 95$ perf_ 'No• Z`Yp ~:i^. Cap. Util Satn Delay Stop Bacic oF Index (vE (veh Rate Queue /h) /h) x (sec) (vein) 7est: Wes;. Ammroach 12 L 496 806 100 0.515 8.1 I.08 6.3 27.08 '-1 T 438 1003 71 0.437 ~ 7.1 0.83 , 2.9 22,26 ~ _3 R 104 238 71 C.437 7.2 0.85 2.9 5.11 South Anproach 32 L 1.14 130• 100 0.877 38.4 2.25 12.4 9.43 31 T 283 322 100 0.879 36.9 2.31 14.0 22.59 33 R 148 168 100 0.681 35.6 2.37 24.0 11.59 East: East Approach 22 L 153 306 42 0.500 9.5 0.98 3.4 8.16 21 m 360 731 42 0.501 9.1 0.94 3.4 19.08 23 R 908 753 100 1.206* 205.411.95 116.6 194.20 iorth: ISorth Av=roach 42 L 539 906 100 0.595 3.6 0.68 4.3 26.79 41 128 246 86 0.520 3.7 0.63 3.2 6_08 43 R 304 584 68 0.521 3.7 0.66 3.2 14.02 NorthWest: North West Approach 82 L 204 422 100 0.483 8.6 0.94 3.2 11.12 81 174 360 100 0.483 9.5 0.94 3.2 9.24 83 R 104 215 lOG 0.484 9.5 0.97 3.0 5.40 x iVlaxirium degree of saturation va;.l Plaza Hotel * FUT * 'uture Condit=ons _n*_ersection No.: ~ Rounc3about iable S. 15 - CApACIT° p,1dD Lr.V~'L Or SERVICE (HCM STYLE) Mov Mov Total ToLal Deg. Aver. LOS No. Typ Flow Cap, o; Delay (veh (veh Satn /z) /h) (v/c) (sec) N1es`: hest Aamroach 12 L 496 806 0.615 8.1 B 11 T 436 1003 0.437 7.1 B 13 R 104 238 0.437 7.:? B 1038 2047 0.515 7.6 B • ~ -,oc4-h: Sout:: :narcach, 32 L 114 130 0.877 38.4 D 31 T 283 322 0.879 36.9 D HCS. Gnsicaalized I^te_seczio^s ?__?_.-=s2 2.1c ACC3.:C0 pzg= 2 N:.^rriCSti'i?er- TWj` _n_?=s°_z:_Oi: J:°:) I. r._ ~=0:i1 Pf:i 0: \B JE Co Flows vz^? 902 Pote.^:=:a1 Capac'_ty: (zcph) 4-83 Moyem=r,L CaLaci:y: (p_-on) 483 ?rob. Of QL'e'.:°-^ree Jt3t-°: 0.80 I:,te_seczion Per=oamance Summary Avc 9.5 % ?_ow MoJe Shared Totai Queue Azprpach _ Ra=° Cap Cap Deiay I,eng*h LOS Delav Mov=ment (pcph) (o--pn) (pcph) (sec/veh) (v=h) (sec/veh) 9.3 S3 F, 96 483 9.3 0.8 B In*°=Sec;.ion Delay = 0.3 sec/veh - _ ARRB Transport...Research Ltd - SIDRA 5.11 . Felsburg Holt 6 Ullevig 13 . Registered User No. 1234 , Time and Date of Analysis 9:11 A*i, Aug 26,1998 Vail Plaza Hc=e1 * F7T f Pature ConcLt--orxs Lntersection No.: SIDsZA US Highway, Capacity ManuaZ (1994) Version Ftoun.dabout - RUN INFORMATION k Basic Parameters: Intersection Tyne: Roundabout Driving on the right-hand side of the road SiDRA US Highway Capacity Manual (1994) Version Input data specified in U5 units Default Values File No. 11 Peak flow period (for per:o:mance): 30 minutes Unit time (for volumes):120 minutes (Total Flow Period) Deiay desinition: Overall delay, Geometric deiay included Delay =ormula: Highway Capacity Manual Leve1 of Service based on: Delay (HCM) Queue definition: Back of q_ueue, 95th Percentile Vail Plaza :iotel * FUT * Future Conditions Intersection No.: Rounciabout • Pable S.3 - INTERSECTION PARAMETERS Degree of saturation (highest) = 1.206 Practical Spare Capac_ty (lowest) _ -30 € Tota: ve:icle flow (veh/h) = 4463 Totai vehicle caaacity, a1Z lanes (veii/h) = 7189 Average intersection delay (s) = 50.9 Z.argest average movement delay (s) = 205.4 Largest back of queue, 95$ (ft) = 2916 Performance Index = 392.16 Totai fue1 (ga/h) = 285.3 Total cost = 2379.22 Intersection Level of Service = D Worst movement Leve1 0: Service = g Vail Plaza Hotel * FUT * ='uture Condi tions . Inte=section No.: Roundabout ?'a]o1e S.6 - INT :RSECTION PERFORMANCs. . Total Total Aver. Prop. EfF. Perf. Aver. Flow Delay llelay Queued Stoa Index Speed -(veh/h) (veh-tn/h) (sec) Rate (mph) 4453 63.12 50.9 0.772 3.29 392.16 11.1 • 33 R 148 168 0.881 35.6 D _ 545 620 0.881 36.8 D - :ast: East Anvroach 22 L 153 305 0.500 9.5 B 21 T 356 731 0.501 9.1 B 23 R 908 753 1.200* 205.4 _ 1927 1790 -1.206 134.1 F "Jortn : North Approach 42 539 900 0.595 3.6 A 41 T 128 245 0.520 3',.7 A 43 k 304 584 0.521 3_7 P_ - 971 1735 0.595 3.6 A ' • 'Qor::.'tiWest: NorYi: West Aaproacn 62 L 204 422 0.483 8.6 B 81 T 174 360 0.483 9.5 B 83 R 104 .215 0.464 9.9 B _ 482 957 0.484 9.2 3 AZ.L VEHICLES: 4463 7189 1.206 50.9 D INTERSECTION: 4463 7189 1.200 50.9 D Level of Se_vice calculations are basiad on average overall delay (ECM criteria), independent of the cu=rent delay definition used. For the criteria, re=er to the "Level of Service" topic in tne SIDRA Outaut Guide or the Output section of the on-line help. * Maximum v/c ratio, or critical green periods End of SZDRA Output - n -u -r, lU. 1vJ~ J•.lY?~ u+++ua;n n1iy n~.JvUin lYV, . . - _ , - - F r o m :1070 FELSBURG HOLT ULLEVIG rngineesixr pachs m cramsponadoa sotAcions I NO\811~~ 16, 1999 Mr. 7im Losa Zehren and Associstes, fnc. ~ P.O. Box 1976 Avon, Catoradv 81620 RE: Access Iswea - Propoaed Vml Plaza Hoce! FHU Aeference 99-t99 I Deac Tim: I ; We have prepared this lettsr in roponse io your letter dsted Ncvember 4, 1999 'regac+ding access issues at the proposed Vail P1aza Hotel. We have adcirssaed wclti cammeat as folfows: Cornmm L- 7ire posslbilit y of traffic bacAafng up t+o the rounda6out fiam the south cntry vn Vad Rcsd wlthaut a ded/caW left tum lanw- A tare! srsclcing distance vf 310 feet wouid be avaiiable along Vaii Rosd between the Roundabot,+= and the propcsad southem tbtel enVy_ This staclang distaoce would aczommociate a queue lengttt of about 15 vehicles. On avetage, h Is foreeas'ted that about 1 vatiicle per minutc wll) tturf left irrto the sfie. and about 13 vehicles per mintstr. will cotrflctue south atong Vai1 Rcad_ Pnder an exrreme candition. 'rf all 14 of thasa vahiclss were ta ztop at the entry irne*secticn, then a queue lertqth of about 280 het woutd be genucated. 5uch a ~ queue length would noi excaed the avallable sucWng dls=Snce. However. thls represerrLS a worst case scenano. Queus iengths ara expected m be significartly less than 280 fieet, sic?cs ; mort than 1 venlcie per minate acE expected to be abte to wm ltft into the site. ' ~ By evaluating the avai ie 'gap" time for teft-tvming vehicias aiong Vail Raad, it was estirTaatsd that abaut 4 iciss per minute, or 1 vahicle everY 15 sezonds, cauld tum lefit Inte the sate. Jn a 15-s~an lntervai, about 4 vet~icles (on average) ara fareeas'ied ta head soudl alonq~ Vaii Aoad. tf 411 4f these vehicles were tc step at the entry intarsecrien, then a queue Sength of about SO feet would be generatsd. Such a queue would noL even blecf the proposed exit ariveway cf the Notel site. } i I 303.7Z1.1M0 • 6u ]M.721.M32 ~ Cauas•ood C490wte Pl-= ~ 7953 E M*,rood AMe. Sc. 7D0 ~ . . Fa*woad, CO S0113 ~ . . _ - - - From:1070 Navember 16, 1999 - y. Mr, Tim Losa . Psge 2 ~ Cama,w! 2 The safacy and/w risks associst+sd wiM ihe hod exit located eig'ht feet svuih of the VaU Gsreway access w? Val1 Road In sincations whsre two accrss drivewaYs am clasely 3PCW, k is imperativa frvm a safety star:dpoirYC that qood sight dLsrance is availabie at bcth s=,sm' Safety at x,ch intsrsections i can alsa be improved by minirnWr?g che numbar af canffict'"D n'rns. Ttds can be done by ~ - nestrfctina ingress attd/or egrsss tumins mcvementa. In the cue of ttw proposed Hotel. it is . ~ recommended that the accssa be l;rtked to outbound mavwven'ts oNY (i.s. an a:it only). As noted in our September 27. 1999 lettar report, prohibiting inbOund teft tians at this acceas wdl j efiminete overlapping left num canfllcts along Vai1 fiood. . ( Therefcre, while this sparng is nat am ideal candirion, the Provissan af good sight dLsUr=• i the restricUOn of cmovements (outbourid onty), the forecasted low vofume o'f exiting trafflc, and ~ the relstively low speed ar+ROnment shouid allow for an acceptable condrtian. Camrn~ni 3: The sefery anc~/or risks assoc~te~d wlth the hotelloading a~nd de/ivpsy enL?Y an/Y accefs Zs indlcat+~sd !n Oprion A ar,d rY's proximity io the ratiindabovr on tAe South Fronrayre Raad. The benefits and d;awbacics o1 !he proRosed desi9^ af ti'fe fronta9e rosd access have been idenMied ats follo • The proP veway is designed such that deiivery uuclcs (including seMf-trailet truclcsf +nto the unloading/dock area of the site wiithaur. impsc.ting vaffiC on the froMeg* ?oad- ' er+try lane provices a refuge area for decderating (right wming) vehid~. . The pro4c thefebY inQ thv Gkelihoodl of reer~nd aolltsiott~ fsam trafflc exitinp =he raundebout. ,e?tsa, a !e ot trucic can stop within thi5 refuge (while a de~very vehlcle is maneuvering wtthin the site) and teaffc elong the Fronta9e Rcsd virill still not be imvacred- . , Wrong•waY movements cau?d be made up the inbound accss lane. Nowevw, ttt+s can be mitigates3 by pesting 'Do Wot ErtLer' andlor'Wron9 Way" signs. . As notec' bn+ thjQ Town's Enqineer, encering vehldes cautd rear-end a trudc making baczing 'n=euYess ar+-tite. Hvwever, thia can be mttiga[ed by posted 'Yteld' signs *he basa flf the anny tane. ihis yviit aiart an iracaming driver of potential cmflieL j ~ i . ~ ~ ~ I . I . . I I ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ I ,5 c ~ti ~ u . ~ _ ~ ~ - - ci Mel c~ ki rir I"v. ~ r . ~ ~ ~ De N&'T SN so" ~ ~ c - - - - - _ ~ . ~ • ~ i~~~ c ~ ~ ?.~.*N,,4t OF .ti _ , ~ yilLb ~ i . Do NOr V8dl P1mm IiOtBl ~ I j \ /~---%~a---------------, L,mdl% and WYety - Opfim A ~ 1 1 ~ i? 19'4" Bpait lldfity Yd" i v' ~ ~"?u~YI~e~G'u~tb/~~ . r,Am .ee Amcift tm, ~ M w M ~ ~ * I Q ^ v ~ o \ ~ i ts ~ i ; ' ~ • ~ ~ . , - - - - - - - ' . ~ Z E H R E N ~'jat~ t AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ve. No v o ~ isss Thursday, November 04, 1999 Mr. Lawrence Lang Transportation Engineer II Felsburg, Holt and LJllevig. . Greenwood Corporate Plaza . . 7951 E. Maplewood Avenue, Suite 200 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Re: Vail Plaza Hotel W. Lang: I had recently reviewed your report dated September 27, 1999 with the town engineer. In reviewing the report and the associated access points, the erigineer wouId like us to address a few additional items. Specifically, the town engineer would like us to address: 1. The possibility of traffic backing up to the roundabout from the south entry on Vail Road without a dedicated left turn lane. 2. The safety and/or risks associated with the hotel exit located eight feet, (eighteen feet from the centerline of the gateway drive), south of the Vail Gateway access on Vail Road. 3. The safety and/or risks associated with the hote] Ioading and delivery entry onIy access as indicated in Option A and it's proximity to the roundabout on the South Frontage Road. It is our intention that 55 semi-trailers, and 45' passenger coaches use the drive (entry) lane for backing prior to departing through the east exi[. Our feeIing is that passenger coaches only frequent the hotel during the "off season" or low traffic periods due to the fact that the hotel operates as a&actional fee condominium half the year and does not have the remaining occupancy to be able to cater to large groups. Additionally, other than the initial equipment and furnishings move-in period, we foresee no semi- trailer h-affic although it has been determined that we need to provide for such vehicles. It is our objective to have all other vehicles inr.luding 35' sUaight-body trucks and 50' articulated (beer delivery) be able to tum right out of the structure with minimal maneuvers. It is the town engineer's concem that vehicle entering the drive will rear-end vehicles using the drive lane for a backing movement 4. The safety and/or risks associated with the hotel loading and delivery exit only access as indicated in Option .A and it's proximity to the rounciabout on the South Frontage Road. Specifically, the town engineer would like some comment on the feasinility and safety of both autos and the larger service type vehicles tuming left on the frontage road. We have preliminarily indicated medians for protection of the center tuming lane in this option. Addirionally, the town engineer had asked us to eYplore additional options for a combination in/out 90- de2ree access. Enclosed is Option B exploring that option. Please just generally discuss any positive or negative impacts associated with this scheme including safety concerns associated with its proximity to the roundabout. , ARCMITECTIiRE•PLANNING•INTERIORS•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE P.O. Box 1976 • Avon, Coloradc, 81620 •(970) 949-0257 • FAX (970) 949-1080 1W 1Ja J . J.1Ji76 "LUilL:11 AAL AJJVVIA 3 . • From:1070 November 18. 1999 - - - - Mr. Tm tosa • Page 3 Overall, n shculd be noted that tha vol?une cf ffaffic entenng and exting the site ss vpsy lovv and trUCk related trefflC is expeCted t4 be inffSqlR'rit DurinB Peak Deriods, only 1 vehide every 3 mintsLes (on averaga) is forecasted Ua wm inro rhe site, ard abCU= 1 vehicie every 5 minutes is expected to sxit the site, an everaga- Also, it is arrticipaced that traffc w+31 ertter tfie s6te at low speeds, giva+ thai the accesa is locaied in dose proxim[ty to a roundabout v, nere axiting speeds are low. Canuuient 4, The safety and/orjisks amodaied wiffi the hotd Ibadwg and de&ery avt oNy ac=ass as 1naEicataal:n Optlon A snd it's proximfty to the rioundabaW an die Sorrd, Fiontaye Aload. $pecificaUy, the rown e?Wmer would /late sv~s cvminent on the fkasWtiry and ss&ty of bod? eatos and dre laigw _.Arvce rype vehicles tivrnrng /e!t an ihe fron=ge road. in ragards to ahe fosibility of trucks tuming leh onto the fromge rosd. it eppesa from the turrung templates that y!ou provided tttat this aftutd not be a pmblem. From an opemtiand siendpoirjt.it wss determinedthatth. artbound left tuminp uattic rvitt expsrienca lonp dalays (levet af s8rvice ef 'E' cond(tions) during peak periods. Nowever, this does*not necassM imply thst tuming out cf Tha site wiU bs unsafe, but oniy that drivsrs rYwy have io wait for Iona periods before an accapcable gap ire traffic is avaiiebie for tumine. Sefety beevmes an issue if sdriver becames, impacient snd gums,onco the ftcntag8 road when a gap in traffic ia not sutf cient_ I - In regards tv the option:of provkiing e 90-deDrcs accass aiong the frorttage rosd, we befi4ve that tlzis also repressnts a viabie option from an operrtional sumdpoint provided that the entry and exii prades meLK Town criteria. Hewevef, it eppears that a 55-fvot sem%traler could rwt ' rnan euves on-site without making a bacfcing manauver onto or off of the frorrtage roed. Such a manewer would c: eata a very haa1'dous situ2liion. If you have any quastions regarding our findings or if yeu need addrtionat asaistanca, pieasa catl. Sincerety FEI-SBIJRG HOLT & UllEV1G ~ Lavimn . ng + Transpvrration asr Il .i ~ ( ~ ~ ~ - - - . , Vail Plaza Hotel Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 11/04/99 The design intent of both options is to schematically meet the deveiopment standards and turning radii of the types and numbers of vehicles dictatecl by the town engineer and planning staff: It is our intention that we have the approved design fully engineeTed for confumarion of the ideas presented pnor to permitting of the project by the town or CDOT. Please do not hesitate to contact me or the; town engineer, Greg HaK, with any questions or concezns. We would hope to have confirmarion of these issues by Friday, November 12, 1999 if it is at all possible. Sincerely, ~ Tim Losa Project Manager Zehren and Associates, Inc. Cc: George Ruther, Senior Planner, Town af Vail . Greg Hall, Town Engineer, Town of Vzul Enclosures 2 ~ ~ _ / ~ ~ - - ~ . _ - ~ , / , ~ - _ _ - ` - - - - - - . _ - - - / f- \ _ . , _ _ _ - - / - ~ ~ ~ _ . _ - - , _ _ _ , - - = - . ~ _ _ _ " _ ~ , - - - - - - - ~ ~ _ - - - ~ - - - . - - . ~ - - - ~ ~ - - - - - _ - I `\i+t1, BU{ bas ~A~ _ nu ' : - 1• ~~-,.1f%i~~'_~ ~~'v. ` - f,, ~n • ' i I ~ _Z_ . • ~ ~ _ - tn~ _ _ ~L' • 'a~ , ~ ~iew4i \ \ ~ . ~aw~. 11 ~ - . ' ~ rer ; I i VaIl PIaZB H04Cfl Losding end~g ~~mon A aNn. ~ 9tale:l•-211'-0" I i Nwembc 4,1999 J[.O1D~ I I Tahrm md Amociatm, Inc. i I I ~ I I . I I I o ' I I ' . ~ .i / ~ - , ~ ~ - . - - - ~ ~ ~ - = - , ~ - ~ , _ , - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ , - - ~ - , ~ , - _ _ , , , - - _ . ~ ~ ~ - ~ . . _ _ , ; ~ . ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ' - _ - - - " \ ~ ms , \ , \ \ ~ . - - - - - ' _ . J - " . i I ~ - ~ ~ - T O . ~nr~ - - - - - _ ~ _ ~ ~m. - ~ I - ~L-------~--------------_____.-----hu`n'-- ~ Vsefl Pflmza Hotefl ~ ~ - Loading andDeuvcrr-Option a 19'-6" Spmt Utility Vehicle 9a1a1"-21W Novanber4, 1"9 LobbY T.eMm~ d Auoofeen. Im. ~ I q I 1 I ( I o I I I I I , I i ~ ~ " ~ - / , - ; , , , , - ~ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - , - . , , ~ - - . • ~ - - - - . - - - - - ~ - \ - - - - ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - ~ - - - ~ - . ~ " _ - - - , \ \ ~ • - - ' - - - ' - I ~ ~ ; ~n.. , ) ~ ~ .~z~ - , i T-7/ . - \ • \ _ _ - - - ' _ _ - - - - I _ ' ~ ' - ..----ue ' ' •r"+ r J - ~ ~ ~ - - I \ \ \ u - - ~ _ \ \ I Vait Pl8Z.3 liOBEl Loadinand IDeliu B aY - Option A SS' 3emihailer \ ~ • ~ • ~ c.~~.~. . ~ ~ 9ala 1"=20'-0• NwaobQ4,1999 1Labby ` \Y\ ~ TrLem d Auaciaon. Ioo" ~ ~ - 1 b I ' 1 ( I I - I 1 ,r ' •°=c - . ; , i ~ / ~ / ( - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ - _ , ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ ` - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ' \ \ `_i ' ~ ~ ' ~ ' - - - ~ , ~a ~ ~ _ _ - - - - - - - - - ' C ~ ~ _ - - - - 1 ~ - , - - = . ~ ~ = _ - ' . - - ----------1~ ,i ~ . - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ! ~ ~ . - - - , -1 ~ \ - - - - - - \ \ - - - - 7'~~--- . ~ " - - - - . - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t/~ - ' ~ ~ 1 - - - ~ - - - - _ - - / , ~ - . . V&ll P1a2ffi HOtCl _ ~ ~ - - - - - I ~ I.aading aad IDelivery - Op6un A ~ , ~ \ - - r ' 45' Coech ~.un. 7 ~ - - - - - - - -JL= _ - - - I I Snla l"-201-0" xovemb.a, 1999 I.obby zehcm.ue Auod.ow,lne. ~ i r I / 1 I . ~ I i . 1 ~ f I ' i • ~ ~ Y.~_ .,..a: ; . - . . ~ , . , " _ „ ' ~ ~ ~ - - ` ~ . . _ - - - - _ . - . . ~ - . . _ . ' - ~ _ _ _ _ _ : - _ - ~ . - _ - ' _ - ,l ~ - ~ _ i I ~ ..'4 ~ ijs • , - . ' ~ - - - - _ - - - ~ \ _ - _ _ \ / . _ _ ~ , . ~ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ L-'_~ _ \ \ \ I ~ ~ ~ i c Muasl• VanflPlmmn ]EAogefl Loading and IDelivery - Optioa A 35 Shaigtrtbody/50 Articuletod Sdc1"-2m-o• Nwembc4, 1999 rt.obby Zahm and Auocfahs, lm. FF d I 1 I ~ ~ I . ~ I I I I ~ v I .i k . , . s:, ~ . . 3 ~ ~ y ~ " 9~~ - _ \ ~ , ~ - - - - / ~ - _ - _ - - ; a _ _ - - ~ - - - _ - ' - - . - _ - ~ - - ~ -5-. - - = ~ - _ - T y • _ - ~ ~ ` ...J~ _ _ ' . . M ^ y.. _ ' ~ ,I - _L-- - - I ~a . . ,t - - . . ~ o . ~ = - - I - - " - ~ Vai 1 PlBZ& 1H[atel . trr QUpt EII ~ _ _ /1 _ :l ii? I ~ [ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 19 - 6~ SPmt Ubllty VChiClO - Zr REgW ~ ~ I---- ~ _ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - ~ -11 ~/__II 1'-- jF Zebm md ~ • i~y/~~ - ~ _ . __j~ ~.I_, - ; - C - - i , ~ , , I , n - I ~ n 0 i I ~ i ! ' ~ ~ ~ _ .f • _ - - _ -<<~ \ - ' ' _ I - ~f. py ~ . ~ _ _..C ~ . _ y _ I ~ . . _r . ~ . . ~ . . . - ' ~ ~ ~ „^---1• _ _ ~ `~4: iY.\~ , . e. ~ ~ ~ ' _ _ . . : . ~ .'f S.:S. Y.'C. . - . ? _ . . ~ . ..1. . ~J.' . " " ' 1~ i . : ' " • . . . ~ ~ . . v'~ - . . . . . ' . . ~ . . . ~ . ; . . _ _ : . _ ~ . . . - . . . _ . :f. . . . ~ ~~.'t ~ . _ i..•: . . ..t~.. . _ - _ . ' .li-_' . ~ . . . • ~ ~ ~ - ~ II! . .n:.. : . • • ~ ' . ~ ' i:T.~ ..~~....i,:~:...:~.. . . . . . ~l« -c~ ' . . ~.t. ~ . "I ' ' ~ x• - _ , - l . . ~ ' . . . ~ - - ~ _ _ : ~ : . . . ...i . , ~ ~ ' . . _ . ; . : ~ . . ~ , . ~ ~ _ • r:,. - . _ . . j ~ i. . ~ . . .i:v'.. . " , . . . ~ . . „ . ~ , i - , . . - a? --~f - . . _ _ _ _ ' 'i` ' . - ' ' ' ' ' • - ~ ' , . `B `CA'fEMAY UIIA114 ' - . - i - ~ o s-. - - . / / i. 1 - - . :31~f it'.•~~'•'.~• / '•l.. 'i. ,•s'' 'vu 'r. i '•f - / ~ - f - " I r?. - ~ ~ : j•'. _ . . . : ~ I - . . ~ i . v ~ „ . . . . , , : ' / . .i Ir - ~ . , : 'i . . . ~ _ , 1 wie r r - . . . . . . . . . . / , . . . . , • ' . j , . . _ . . ~ . . . . . ~ . . . . - _ kY•..~ . . :i . ' ~ . . . "....~.::~.~:-o...:. .'r:.?.);:. _ _ '•'i:::~.+~.... ~ ' { - '~t: ••1,... . ti, ,of~•'~~ .t..j,:...~, ~l. ' .ic` ?i::'.•'c':i: I . . r,.~. . . Y• c:: _ ~y„•;; ~ •„J:.~.T::: _ r %b e ..r _ ~ ~ . ~ 'S - . . . . I na ' K . _ •_F-~ ~:AZ ~'rx ~ ~PI . , . \lLL}/~~ ~ :a _ ~~1•` •'1 , ~ - .S. ~t" 'c'` _ .t. l : J• 1 - - - tc~•. {AS s "or:• F _ P ;...r~......r . . - - •*~i;, w. - , . . . 7.. - . 1. .:a _ Tn, •Y~ . . . . . n..,,..~ . ~ ~ . ; ~ , ~ - • 1 v'1'^. . - . . ~•t::`:~ ' ~ S ~ i. ':r•r .Y•• . S:. a' •a. _ ~ ~ a:h' l .J. n 3. f.~. , L 7 ..1 l.i. $ • 'l: - t. y. °x. G •+7 i :~G'• . _ y ..i~: , tr • t ~y G.~ . r t.N. . •.~+*l i:..: - ~ ~'•y, ';1. ; ~u' ,rj •'i . •,a--,r. , • a. , h.I. .r,.., - a: ~v - •L -uu ' ~S: S'ti• S ~'`i;'.;•::,,;':. . . - ' •:'i' ~ e.~..+ - .RS . .1~; ^,•a i. . f, : n~..., n . : J3:• ` ~rs r~- ~ ~ ~•i - . 7 . %3 . ' . ~ .6" ••k-; 1~'. _ :',s •:iw~ - ~ - . . - t ~ i: - - ' ? 1 . - 1.~ l' • \ .::j~.~.- • , . ~ ...y' `I~.: . . =7 i•i; . _ - i ~ : c~~ .t ~ - - _ _ " - ::i',• ' •t::..y ' .'1+I. J ~ - ;'y~,'. '•f ~ > > I :L~' , r .l~-:-~~~ < 4 ~ _ ~ ' . . ~ . t i,i~:; . . ~ ' ' I . . . : . _ L k-: . _ _ ~.::~:7~,.~::::~::~; ? ~ , . . . , . . . . : 1 . - - - - ~ J . - •:i: _ . + - - - - _ i _ _ . . ~ . . ~ . - ~ ~ - - ~ / . 1 ' •.l'.: . " 1'i'~ - - _ ~ ; / ' . \ - ~ ..'.P.' . O ' ~ - a.- `.ii• ~ ° ' '.l,•~.~.. In Pl7TVRB' ' . . , i Y.~'':.'~S''e~;,~.;;_^• - .1. - 77 - ry. g ~ •2z::.•.S°~:•r., ~ ~ . ~.M ~•1`'4s . ~ { , . ;3t. ;1','•~;- . ~A~• tiA 58 f. _ P ~ ~ ~K _ .f " ~ :u - ^7` ~ -j! a: ~ ~-'6 AW ` - ':t ~ •°r . z>. 'I - :~3`°i 1:... t•, . ~.f '-~:--•r .GZ i•,. . u: - s+°- r'; . ~ - { u. '4iN'PI.tZ i ,'•,c;f. L""f.:;:.:.,:~ - .•,:i;P~ , . ~ ~ ~ . - `a~'' r^ . Ei^' •_t:~' r<<; ~ . .~J• "i~` l•if^- P ~ ~ . H/IS9 • ~ ::c,: • ,:,~;r: i ~!i:: - _ • - _ .c. > Y - 'c - .~5 _ ?(:.r. ~ l:f: r.•'~~= : NC _ - i . Z~ - •,l: : > - 3. - `S•i \ ~ •:i~: , . . . . . r`. ' - ~ . . ~ . V f. . \ - _ . . . . . { . - - - i-- 1 , - - ~ _ . . , - . ..i . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ..,t ~ ~ , . 5..,~~ . ~ 5 •aa k-.,:',j , . . . _ . ~ . ~ ....~.•~L.:. . :~i..•• ' . _ . . . . . . : . . . ...f ..,'~i.....o....,~ ~.q . , . L~ - . ....f. I " rt ~ . . ~ . . ; . ..~;i-.~ ~ ' ~ . .L.. -,•t<: ~ ,•s•, I , , - , w , ~ y'. - ~ 1r ~ _ n _ . t•ti•:::i,.. ~ 5:.. ' •S - 1. .:.x:-. Lt ~ ~ ~l ~ j ~ w ++q_ ` ~T- ' ~'~5'::.:•: !Sly~f+,"' . _ ;J~.;;o•~~ I / 7 r ~ ~~~:-.,,=•:v=~ " I: C7 i - ?i' ~'ec%•`.. •d.. - • ~~J ~i .J • '.T.. :1iti.^•f>~:: ~ ~ 1'r \ - 5•+ - ~ t 1 Pd1.?(r y~ ~t,• - I(j rt::, . • T>$'7naa . , ~5' ` I '-YJU~1 }{o} v . u"•, z~tA~~;'•~::.;-,~. :i Piil98 B~~_ 1 ~ rx ~ ,L• `y:: -Y 4N`. I i~;= 1$ VIIliA ~,2•: _ •Y I - ~ s ~ v. •:j~, }y.=.. i~G;v:INH; t ~ A+ •w~ . 5 ..p~n•:: _ \ '.U N: ..a. . l ..ti"~; • :'A '7 •1e SAw7i:` ~:N'i ~ • ' - - - S •b;:`•`•'... :~x•"~ ~3 ~ .a. 'r E•r.•.~?~ e L ~.r' / 4• . . x~s8 . ..t. . :7 , _ - _L ~ - ~r•; '•2'; . - °'1•`:~:•:.-•:.~;':!7:~'' \ ~•e • e.r f 'i~•.: ' ~ s - ~~'~'...;i.•~ . 4:'l - .~1. - •'~i%~ ~r[•.:,•. ' . - - ` . J `i~•:: i • . . I ~1•. I - . ` - ~ \ - \ . - f - ~ . ~'r• _ _ ~ - . 77 ~ ~ f~', . l~ ~ - / 's . J~ ~ N ; . ~~~a:.,:;;: - - - / % - ~'i.'~' I . a i . : . - . r: . . - ~jCl:.. l"1~ :II~l~1V;. - - . : . : az. . . . - ' .L . , . . VAII~ . . . . . . . . . . . _ . j L. I . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ~ ','~C~i:~....~ •=E; . . - . . . , . .:4,: -r' ,1IDR TF . ; t . . . - c~r Y.'• - . . . . . . . , , . . . .s• . . ~ ~ . . . . ' ~ i i:-• . . rY:`•i:'.:: •:j'.~ _i,'~ ,'1:~ . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . , . . . . . , : Y.+~q . . _ . . . . . . . . . . Vail Plaza Hotel Zoninq Analysis (Revised 12/13/99) Lot size: 1.467 acres or 63,902.5 sq. ft. (Phase IV & IV-A only) 3.45 acres or 150,282 sq. ft. (All Phases) 1998 SDD Major Development Underlying 2oning Existing Amendment Proposal Revised 1999 SDD Major Standard of Public Accommodation Vail Villaqe Inn (reieetedl Amendment Proposal Lot Area: 10,000 sq.ft min. 150,282 sq. ft. 150,282 sq. ft. 150,282 sq. ft. GRFA: up to 150% or 225,423 sq. ft. 83% or 124,527 sq. ft. 133% or 200,460 sq. ft. 117°h or 175,666 sq. ft. (87,889 sq. ft. existing) (129,156 sq. ft. proposed) (104,362 sq. ft. proposed) (36,638 sq. ft. remaining) Dwelling units per acre: 25 du/acre 24 du/acre 12.7 du/acre 12.7 du/acre (AU & FFU unlimited) Site coverage: 65% or 97,683 sq. ft. 37°h or 56,188 sq. ft. 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. Setbacks: front: 20' N/A 12' 6' sides: 20' N/A 01, 8' & 6' • 5', 0', 2', & 5' . rear: 20' N!A g1 51 Height: 48' sloping 68' sloping 85.75' sloping 73' sloping (Phase III) 87.5' (arch.proj.) 73.75' (arch, proj.) Parking: per T.O. V. Code Section 177 spaces 394 parking spaces 288 parking spaces (373 required at (246 new parking spaces) buiid-out per Ord.) (42 existing @ Phase III) Loading: per T.O.V. Code Section three berths six berths five berths 12-10-13 Landscaping 30% N/A N/A 25% or 19,171 sq. ft. Commercial sq. footage: 10% of aliowable GRFA 31 % of GRFA or 38,961 sq. ft. 23% of GRFA or 47,226 sq. ft. 26% of GRFA or 46,124 sq. ft. or 22,542 sq. ft. 0 F:leveryone\pecUnemoslvviza ~ PI N n m . p rt bd Attachment C Valll Plaza Hotel Proposal Comparison (revised 12/13/99) The following table provides a comparison betwe;en the 1998 Vail Plaza Hotel proposal and the most recent 1999 Vail Plaza Hotel proposal 1998 SDD Major Development Amendment iProposal 1999 SDD Major Standard/ (reiected) Amendment Prooosal Plus/Minus Lot Area: 150,282 sq. ft. 150,282 sq. ft. No Change GRFA: 133% or 200,460 sq. ft. 118% or 176,910 sq. ft. 16% or 23,550 sq. ft. (129,156 sq. ft. proposed) (105,606 sq. ft. proposed) 23,550 sq. ft.) Dwelling units per acre: 0.29 du/acre 0.29 du/acre No Change (276 au) (99 au) - 177 au (15 ffu) (48 ffu) + 33 ffu (1 du) (1 du) No Change Site coverage: 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. No Change Setbacks: front: 12' g' -3' sides: 5', 2', & 6' S', 2', 8 0' nc, nc, &-6 rear: 8' 5' - 3' Height: , 85.75' slopiny 74.25' sloping - 11.5' 87.5' (arch.proj.) 93.5' (arch. proj.) + 6' Parking: 394 parking spaces 288 parking spaces - 106 parking spaces (246 new parking spaces) (42 existing parking spaces) Loading: six berths five berths - one berth Gross Building Area: approx. 395,862 sq. ft. approx. 328,958 sq. ft. - 66,904 sq. ft. Conference/ Meeting Facility: approx. 21,009 sq. ft. approx. 15,338 sq. ft. - 5,671 sq. ft. Spa Area: approx. 27,802 sq. ft. approx. 24,799 sq. ft. - 3,003 sq. ft. F: \everyone\peclmemos\wi pc Attachment D . mL E H R :A ;`il) A:iS(!{IA1- E%, IN~ . Tuesday, October 19, 1999 NIr. George Ruther Senior Special Projects Planner Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Vail Plaza Hotel George: This is a written description of off-site impacts and their proposed mitigation as requested by your letter dated 10/13/99. A. Pedestrian Impacts -Vail Road. \Ne will be providing streetscape improvements in accorclance with the streetscape master plan for the eastem side of Vail Road from the corner of East Meadow Drive to the northern most property line of our site. These improvements include new "Village" Iight Fxtures and standards, curb anii gutter, and a six-foot wide brick paver sidewalk to match the color, pattern, and size of the exis;ting sidewalk at East Meadow Drive.. Additional landscape improvements and final sidewalk co:nfiguration will be provided in accordance with desig.n review zoning regulations. B. Pedestrian Impacts - East iVteaclow Drive. T'he Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide streetscape improvements in accordance with the streetscape master plan for the northem side of East Nleadow Drive from the comer of Vail Road to the westemmost of the Vail Village Inn Phase IA structure to mitigate peclestrian impacts in this area. The proposed improvements include replacement of the existing cube fixtures with new "Village" light fixtures and standards and a six- foot wide brick paver sidewalk to m;itch the color, pattern, and size of the existing sidewalk at the corner of East Meadow Drive and Vail Road. Additional landscape improvements and final sidewalk configuration will be provicled in accordance with design review zoning regularions. C. Pedestrian Impacts - South Frontage Road. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide streetscape improvements in accordance with the master plan for the southern side of the South Frontage Road from the comer of Vail Road to the westernmost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase V driveway to mitigate pedestrian in:lpacts in this area. The proposed improvements include new "Village" light fistures and standards, curb and gutter, and a six-foot wide brick paver sidewalk to matcll the color, pattern. and size af dle existina sidewalk at alon~~ the South Frontage Road. Additional laneiscape improvements and tinal ~sidewallc contiguration will be provided in accordance with design review and other applicable zoning. regulations as well as Colorado Department of Transportation. D. Pedestriau Impacts - South Frontage Road. 'The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide streetscape improvements in accordance with the master plan for the southern side of the South Frontage Road from the easternmost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase V dnveway to the westernmost corner of East Meadow Drive (Crossroads) to mirigate pedestrian impacts in this area. The proposed improvements include white concrete standard curb and gutter, and a six-foot «+ide, four-inch thick, reinforced, white concrete sidewalk. These improvements specifically esclude utility relocation, engineered structures for retaining earth or support of the sidewalk, handrails, . . , 111±~._. KC, , U( A - 'I itf_: _'i .n . tlcl`-.-. - iU_'jt_i})~} • Vail Plaza Hotel Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 10/ 19/99 guardrails, or walls meant to provide for the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk, and/or drainage systems meant to control surface water runoff. It is assumed that the items specifically eYCluded will be provided by another entity to be coordinated with the proposed sidewalk. Additionally it is assumed that all improvements along the South Frontage Road will be at the discretion of the Colorado Department of Transportation. E. Public Transportation Impacts - East Nleadow Drive. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to . provide p.ublic transportation infrastructure improvements in accordance with the streetscape inaster plan for a new bus stop adjacent to the westernmost portion of the Vail Village Inn Phase lA structure to mitigate impacts in this area. The prooosed improvements relocation of fixed bus signage and fixtures, and a bus stop similar in size, ma[erials and character to the existing bus stop located on the south side of the roadway. Additional landscape improvements and final c:onfiguration will be provided in accordance with design review and other applicable zoning regulations. It is our understanding that the existing surface water runoff from the existing structures and the proposed structures on the site is would be in the same quantities and would drain to the same locations as currently e:cist. Additionally, we would assume no increase in surface water on our site would occur from the design of proposed drainage structures on the South Frontage Road. Therefore would assume that no major drainage infrastructure improvements would be necessary to accommodate the proposed structures. Please da not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, ~ Tim Losa Project Manager Zehren and Associates, Inc. ~ 2 Z E - H ~ Pv Tuesday, October 19, 1999 Mr. George Ruther Senior Special Projects Planner Town of Vail . Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Vail Plaza Hotel George: This a final written statement as requested by your ]etter dated 10/13/99 to address design criteria A through I as outlived in section 18.40.080 of the town code. It is our understanding that these nine (9) criteria are to be used in evaluating the merits of the Vail Plaza Hotel, the final phase of the Vail Village Inn Special Development District. A. Design Compatibility. We believe that: the hotel is designed in such a way that is both compatible and sensitive to the environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties. Setbacks are consistent with the underlying zoning in that they maintain an average of twenty feet (20') from most adjacent properties to t:he pnmary building walls. Additionally, the structure maintains setbacks consistent with adjacent properties along both the Frontage Road and Vail Road. Mass and bulk are sensitive to adjacent structures in that the hotel is designed to step up in height and bulk from both the street and adjacent smaller structures in order to maintain a comfortable pedestrian scale while maintaining con:sistent heights with adjacent structures roof lines and ridges. Additionally, we have purposefully hipped most of the roof forms at or along public streets and plazas to provide a consistent bulk plane at street level. The stepping and broken ridge lines, along with variations in materials and wall ptanes act to break down the overall mass and bulk of the project and relate the hotel to the surrounding neighborhood. The architectural design is meant to be both compatible with both the Gateway building and the remainder of the special development district while providing some identity to the hotel as both a recognizable and viable commercial stnr.cture within the connnunity. B. Uses, Density, and Activity. The Vail Plaza Hotel is the last phase of the Vail Village IiIn Special Development Disfict and as such was alwavs meant to be the anchor or most densely developed portion of the district. As a fiill service hotel. which includes conference, spa, restaurant, and commercial activities, the hotel meant to act as a"magnet" that drativs people through the other smaller, commercial based structures in the special development district, (including the Gateway building). Additionally, the hotel is legally required to provide loading and delivery seivices, autOmobile access, and parkine for the rE:mainder of the special developmerit distnct. C. Parking and Loading. We believe our parking and loading facilities are in compliance with the requirements of chapter 18.52. ' We are providing six (6); 12' x 25'x 14' underground loading berths. The maximum required is five (5) 12' x 25' berths in accordance with 18.52.150. We believe our parking facilities meet required number of spaces required by zoning chapter 18.52. U,'..., :.r, ii- U I Vail Plaza Hotel Zelueri and Associates. Inc. 961070.00 10/ 19/99 D. Conf'ormity with Master Plan. We believe our development substantially complies with the goals expressed in the various plans contained within the adopted Vail Village Master Plan. The Larid Use Plaii indicates our site as Medium/High Density Residential and as such recommends a lodging orientation with a limited amount of accessory retail. We are proposing to provide an increased amount of "urban open space" or public plaza. and buffering greenspace in the areas indicated as such in The Open Space Plan. We believe that our project complies with the recommendations in Tlze Pafking aiid Circulation Plaii. We are proposing an intemal connection to the Vail Gateway shared pedestrian/auto area as indicated, an improved pedestrian connection to East Meadow Drive including new bus facilities as indicated, and a secondary esternal pedestrian connection to Vail Road between phase ftve and our project. Additionally we would be providing sidewalk improvements from the new bus stop on East Meadow Drive to the Gateway on Vail Road, and Bike/Pedestrian sidewalk improvements from the Vail Gateway to the Vail Transportation Center on the Frontage Road. We believe that our design substantially complies with Building Heiglit Plan in that the plan indicates buildings of five stories both to the east and west of our site along the frontage road and north and south of our site on Vail Road. Our design maintains this four to five story relationship with our neighbors. We feel as though the three to four story designation is inconsistent with cunent conditions and are not applicable as they relate to our site. It is our understanding that these heights indicated in the plan were based on preserving views to Vail Mountain from the four way stop at the Intersection of Vai] Road and the Frontage Road prior to development of the Vail Gateway and the Roundabouts. Because these views no longer exist with the development of the Vail Gateway as acknowledged in the plan, and because stopping to view the mountain is actually discouraged by the movement of traffic in the roundabout, we feel that these standards may no longer apply. Tlie Actiott Plaii indicates our site as an area for potential residential/lodging infill in accordance with previous town approvals with which our proposed project is consistent. The Vail Village Sub-Areas 1-1 of the Yail Village Master Plaii indicates our site as the final phase of SDD #6. In doing so, it identifies a series of goals, which we believe we comply with. Item 1.2 encourages "the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities." Item 2.3 "strongly encourages the development short term accommodation units" and recognizes that when units are "developed above the existing density levels, they should be managed in such a way that allows for short term ovemight rental". ' Itenr 2.4 encourages the development of new commercial infill compatible with esisting land uses. Irern 2.6 encourages the developinent of aftordable housing units and may be required as part of any redevelopment project requesting a density over:levels allowed by existing zoning. Itena 3.2 recognizes the will to "reduce vehicular traffic in the village to the greatest extent possible". Itent 4.1 encourages the irnprovement of existing open space to create new plazas with greenspace. Itenr -5. I recognizes the need and desire to provide fer parkin~ demands on site and ~vith underground and visually concealed parlcing. Itetfi 61 recognizes the need to provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development. E. Natural Hazards. We believe there are no natural hazards that may affect development of this site. F. Site and Building Design. We believe we have addressed this issue by campliance with the Vail Village Nlaster Plan. 2 Vail Plaza Hotel Zetuen and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 10/ 19/99 G. Pedestrian/Vehicular Circulation. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance with the Vail Village Master Plan. Additionally, traffic studies indicate that vehicular circulation pattems are considered safe and have relatively little impact on e,cistine, vehicular circulation svstems. H. Functional and Aestlietic Landscaping. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance . with the Vai] Village Master Plan. Additionally, we believe we have substantially improved on the amount and quality of publicly accessible plazas, greenspaces, and pedestrian circulation systems. 1. Pliasing Plan. The development will be constructed in one phase with completion anticipated for late fall of 2001. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding the information presented. Additionally, if you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tim Losa Project Manager Zehren and Associates, Inc. . 3 . , . _ a ,s. , ~ 's -1 ~ _ - - - ° ' - , - - ~ , ° o . ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~ a~-`~ - ~ l~'1 ~ L~~~--~- ~ ~ _ i-~ - <--0~~ \ , V- 77 ~ > -,~j~~,.-= , _ ~ x;~;~ 3~~-x~...,,, ~a ~ - - _ ~ ~ { ~~='s ~ :y. ~ ~ . . ~ y~~'~ ~ ~ - l~ \ ~ ~ 4~ ~~`x~ '`Y ~ - ~ C. ? ' ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ -11 7n~ ~ 7' K ~ '~r^ ' i t. :L.~ ~ • ~ \ , ~~i / ~ ~ ~J , _ ~ ~ CONCEP TUAL a BUILDING " HEIGHT PLAN LEGEND n ` ~ ~ •wr:~~\ ~i., jy'4~',\~ 3,4 ` ' ` 4Y MA%IMUM RANGE OF BIALDING HEIOHT IN S70RIES VAII VILt-ACE PLAN ~tiR.~• ~4~~ A Wlldirg stay is delirred es 8 teel ol heignt s,a 4 \ ~ L . Ino rool inclutle0l. Exact haight restrictlons' ~ will be datmminetl by zoning. Vaned roof neghts 1 1 . ' within renge soeciiled is desire tl lor each bulldm9 _e 4 omp ~`t y,I I DENOTES EXISTINO OH APPFlOVED BUILDINGS WMGH Plan DO NOT CAWORM TO TNE CONCEPNAL BULDING . MEIGHT PLAN SHFdNG OENOTES AREAS OF SIMLAR HEIGHT . ` l \ r~ O QPP cp ~ ' I 3vt:.Te~t}}~',~ E~ ~~ie~41Si: ' - _ - _ - - - ~ VIEW CORRIDORS ( ELEVATION FROM FRONTAGE ROAD 1 ~ ~ X~ Q~GP~~ .a~~~Q1 , ~L BIALDING PROFlLE FOLLOWS GENERAL BOWL SHAPE OF VALLEY FLOOR ag~a ' ' I BUILDING MASSING f VILLAGE CORE SECTIONI BUILDING HEIGHT ~ PROFILE ' VVILLAGE PLAN own o Y ' Comprehensive Plan ' " ~ , r, S ~ . fI ~ r „ . . . ~ ~i .d ~ ~r ~ r'i,~~", a A. w~+ F1.'~ • ~ ~a.l~+~r~ ~ 6W sl~~ 7~ kSM!~PJ i~y~~~ia~{4da•~ 5~51 . i ~r,,. ~ iy '^t~, "•r ,~.p~'~.~ ~ ~ e ~ . ~w ~ i ° . y " M ~ y y kt 3 r 0.N0 AB~OCI11TE8, ING ~ Z E H R E N vail Plaza Hotel view~ Analysis l ...~.a !~S RM iM w C~ Im4i1 i 'W~YnY! ru IWM~sY'. ~ November 22, 1999 YI~~rN ~ • Y r.. F" w . ~ ~ Md r e r ~ 4. *v ~ , 1 . " d~ ^ . , , , . j . . . ~1th?~ Rk ' II! I I u ~i 4 4ik1•- .I I 7h I ;d 1 ~~kv;r. r a ~ Tq~ ~rV~t'~I ~~N ~ I~i~~%~Q O 3 y'~'~~r,'~'~s*"N~,r~ ~ z EH~R E N ~ ~TE8; INC AND A48OC7 Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 2 November 22,1999 r~ J~ . ;i y,, ~ ~ ~ f e y a ~ ~ 1~ 9 ,~,quRduQ~ 41~~ a i ~ d'~ i Y~p Piq~'~ dy't I , 1 Y , d„ " ~ T~'~'",~,u~ ~ . ~ ~ . ' ~ , W4^4,4 . , . w~ ~ ya ~Ylh~ ~ .r . & p~f OF, • ~~~~~Sn~R~~~~ ? ~ .~~r' ! ~r ~'k~ ~ >~`~~e Yi ay R~'J ifi~~ zviW e~ ro ~ r s4~~s . yrs~ fy Ry .r~ ~ . a . > 'i'~ # ~ r ~s,~ i ~ ~ a r'~' 1* a2~€~,•~t'~+.~4~.'~",~~~{~~. r dGr AVNMZEHREN ~ AND~SBOCIATES. 1MC. Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 3 " rrwow . ~.re.cu~ re.~rGtruar ,.;u;. November 22, 1999 ws~~ ; a M~+ y~ , ~ k~ ~ M ~ M' L N{~~'~~K," ~F +'T,r fi~y,~s~~'~} "4... . a- . . , . - . . . . . . z ~ Z E CH R E N VaYI plaza :Hotel View Analysis 4 ~ ANO ASBQCIA~t9. INC te r~w.wi~¢ .v.~.,.. November 22, 1999 ~ . rg ~ ~ i r x r „ Y y ~ ~'n! J ~ ~ • 1 ' ~ ~ 5 . , ~ ...r ~ wM f I h W ~ ~ Ifi F z a a ~ ! .,7 ~;,a4 ~ ~'~Y~~t.~~ 9 r' .f~V~ f .:~:1„ pi, •6F{ ~ u~ , t~S~, EofP~r`,~ ~~~~6~~ .,H~~ , ~ °kn;. , , h~r;~ ~ . M1r fi~Iww:rP:r~,,I r 4~,• ~ ; , Mp" ~4d~~~'"'f~.,~ G~ t,`.1 ...~'~''.h ~ fnr .,..,.;.)rr ~~I~..N~,~~,~~"v~ .n, ~ ~0 ~.^~.,.ri .,M. iln ~1,.'a~ at,~,.1,..1~ f:;~... 9rr,:~~.~~ ,~-:~~'~1isa ~.+d~'~ ~~`~'"..r. ~i.. „ ,u , ~ 4 a, ~ , ~.,,r ~ r~ ,vw; P ~ ~ F.a w ~ , e S. , f • w ,,1 i w~", p~y~~ ~~~~.v.~ .n.,.'3. .ns. S~'*"~a ~~ia,i.~'~~,. f 4 '~i+~,,.,..,s~'~,.s~u .ra~.ir~. ~ ,wm~~ ~..::u~4~ ~•,ri~.~~4 pu,r~r"~ iY'~.~:.*,t,•~~ 5~.... .r, r~~-,.,,.~ .l. ~,~,'~f~t, r"~.m.•~.~..a~ti '~~:i~,~.~.~,,11~,., y ~~^S,~r7 ~ipi.. i ~b~1~'~~ ~J.~,.~~~ a~+'.~'7 ,.~~~.r. • ~`w~d.~~•~~.la,.~ r. ,...~.uw.~i.F°. • ~ ~..,E Re ~VF.~~... ,~a4'.,r~t.,t'v"~,i C~'~.~."~P.h~.. ~'~..~,Fa I.fne~.,_~ .~~{~..~'7W ~':a,+,~:~l.,u. A..~.. . .?.r ~l'94 . .,f'Vf,S.„. .,i~. - . ~..i ^ rx~ ~A",, r : ,M.:.. ~e~ ~,..,e~ ",'C.~ ~ ° .,5•:.~ t~ ~ ~ '~..r.:.~t v'~.,. Y~~~ ~ ~R".iv ~ [MO ASSpCUTEB, INC 2 E H R E N Vail Plaza ~-Iotel ViewAnatysis 5 rew~a.~~r~. qrrw~w, November 22, 1999 F i ; .'M ~ , , , M . k I P I II Y T ~ ~ ~t~ 4~ ~ a~ t ,-4V t . f~ A7~ . ~ r . ' . s , . . k 1 x~ ''~~~~5 r , i l IR ~ • ~I)I'•4 l f ~1 .IL~IG 8 ; re ` ~a.a..~.,.,.~' ~"dNI;`,+ ~..~.'~•a. ~I~~ k ~y r~qnt" arv : ~1~ . ~ kh 5~"m~ ~P v e f RJ4`+;Y~':r~ c. t h . , ~ ~ , 116. e µ . wG a~ i ~ .e . + ~ , • _ ~ ~N6ASSOCIATE9. INC ~ Z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 6 November 22, 1999 , i wl9!G,~ ~ H y'SJ~ I Y 6 ~'hi.r4l~rb1 f~ . W G.,. ~ R ' t~ y4 € . . ` e .f ~ ~ k ~4 f1h N u,~ i ' . ~I~~ ~~l ia~' ~ % kd ~^fS ~ 9 tl ry~ n '~r. ~ . ~ ' . , S~, . . . ru a . ~ , °r . ~ r.~ ~~';,i ~t~ lik ~ ~::~t ~~y S f+~ rl~ . . , , 4 j.. . sl.. . nl~e. . ~~I§ ~ ~ Is , r.. k~~~. ~ i ~ I. ~ri.lp~dh ,.~j• . .I . . . 1Nn aseos:i~res, rwc., z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 7 ~arr•u.~w•~ ~reNw~~ November 22, 1999 rn.q:r~ , , ~ a•'~_ 1M+~ ~.:".,M: I.~ u u7 p711v... rt . 'y• ,i ~ ~ ~ ir~ w • . . . , . . . ~ • . e . , , , _ ~ ~ , r. + . • ~ . ~ . : , , _ . r c~~y ~ ANO A980CIRtEB. INC ~ z E H R E N vail Plaza Hotel . vieW Analysis g w<.r~ ~l4~ u~f . n~ MYnD T~/pRf .6+ROlCNII ~ti:lci((.~W [ VqW4V ~M 4~TMI~.nY November 22, 1999 ! A~ fl a _ ~iiPl h 7 i r , • . RIK p ° . . . I . . w , ~ e..~~ ..c. ~a- . ...r. ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' }~~J r ~ a~'~,y ' F.. ~i' - f y~` a~ '•y; • ~ ~i . t''~-9;.~, . ~ ~ , ~ 41, . . , ~ . , . . ~ Z E~HR~E N ' AMO A860GI -IlTES. IN0. Vall Plaza Hotel View Analysis 9 November 22,1999 ~ ~ A N ~ ~ E' ~ F I, ~~q4~'h r~~~3~ji7'F~~~~ ~~~~F I~~~~44~ ~N~'.ci~N M ~:I~I ~M~ °...A Jau,~, ;i:;.. ~4 ~ ~M ::i, ry ,f . • r ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ 7a Su *w~e ~ q I~rf r , h I y V , :i,... . y . 4 I 5 . J.. N .1, . ! . . ' . 4 ~ v ~ ~ w ~A z Es H R E N NO~ soci r wc Vail Plaza Hotel sun Shade Analysis Proposed Structure November 22,1999 December 21 - l0am ,i ~ . . . . . ~ t ~ M ~ ~ ^a~' ~t N~ h xi • a ~ il 4 J N Y! T*~5"~~~i . ' , , A~„~d~„., ~ AHO; ssacIArEs. iHc ~ z E H R E N Vail. Plaza Hotel sun Shade Analysis ~~t.~~...r....~»o Proposed Structure I~~IMC aal] sa~ n!kYy mq November 22,1999 Uecember 21 - 2pm . . :t r 9 C C f 1 ' ~ a ry .r.~ s 4, ,f r h m ~~f , e~ , r r•~ i ~ u'. ,JrX~~, u M1,~'i r+~i~r°d ~,h :r,t', ,rd 5 s~`s~"a., ~ , nr~~;rft'~, a ..~k fi'.Y'• y~ ~r'~.,~ ~ {~~~a~s ,i.i~'f 1~~~~~~,v, i~y~~ ~~;a:~k r~9~.^3a'Wh~ tp~y ~vi.~r~iF~~IF~~~ ~r,Qt~^iF~yka~ ;~d~s 'i~'i ~~~~~i,~~~~~~ ~r r~4~~€~'~'~~Iiq~j~K~'Ia9C`~~IMI~~~.~.~ It, a mrh 3~ ~ ~ 9 ~ r d'~r9„~~'s~F~~`~~a~'~~~~{i~~"~a.~;~~.~ s I~+~.. ~ ~~w Tr~ ~w ,,,~~i, i,ti ~ y G~~" ~°~j~~","~~~~~u~~~ r~ trry - „,.m ~ ~ ~.~~;~a~,~ ~r ~d t a. ~ ~~w.. , r.i. ~J' . ,q;,„ ,~d k I ~~.4u9 ti~ v~,a~x,.` i ras :,;•d ~h~ :r, ~ , , ~ , ~ , . . I11~,G ha~~l ~ `~`kP" i ~~F~ ~~i ~~~i qrh'~ ~~dk~ , ~ ' . m,,,.. • .n x , ~ . 4 ~r~r h+i,~: ~ ` ~ ~~~~~~~~r; Nry~'~: t~~; ."`~'r "~1~~°~ ` ~ a4 ~ a F ~ ~ p~yN~ ..................~~aiw~~~~~y" i ~~r w~[" + dm r F >.r r ~ r Pr 4~ r~• ~ - r a ~ ^ ~ . ~ ~ x , a r . ~ ~ ~1~° `~a N i ~ ~ ~M • . ' ' a ~v . ~gP f,~'~i iFA'~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ ~~r r n' ~'J... v p~ h~~~~~~:c - i A8i Yr k 'aT J ..H . . , ~ ~ ~iM%i~"~' . „~'+F"11a..~,K ~ z°ES°"RE4EM1 N vail Plaza Hotel Sun Shade Analvsis Gr? r~„~~.~... November 22,1999 Proposed Structure ~..r~. June 21 - l0am ~ • i y ~ W ~l~~~ 5 . ~~.t~ ' i, . m!~ . .r°~ ~ ~ , 7~ ~F~~!~k ~ i i N f • ~ f ~I ` ~ n ~ 'A i.. . . . , . . i~. , . ~ `S . 41 i ~ x 1 as ai.F ~ a Y! r~ ~5 5 w w ~"r 1 r M M~ ~ ~I ~ ~ AzNO AESMSOHC'IARiES. E INC 1 N Vail Plaza Hotel Sun ShadeAnalysis a.iw+n Proposed Structure •YMM9W r ru IsiV p1~ ~P~ ~ November 22,1999 June 21 - 2pm ' R ~ ~ . I ' ' . . r^^ 'M A dv:•~,'± ~hCM % a vi ~„~i r i~i ~YM t 1~~ t l ~u ' r pf ~'~;~e~ ~t 'Fv~~.P{~r!~ rT" ~r ky sal'y~kyln 4~dSw ~H~ ~n .;L~ 1 ,.,d .7Cw~.~'7 J ~ ~ ~ N r~ ""~4~~.~' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~;*~~4 4:w.~.a ~ 9~., 3N`~~+ 4 ~ i~ ea . ; ~,,tk,w~a~i~~k%~.~j~~,y.,". . - , ~tl~''Tt =~Y a ~ s~w ~ ~k+ I r &3~a ' y r * ~ . ~~I~ uir y~ ~f P . ~ £ r ~ • ~~~p~C~~x ~ °ryx ~ ~ xaaaxl. a p g:, 4r~s ~ ~ , . , ~ , ~ r, ~I~P~., { _ : . . . . F . e . . . . ~ . _ .a. . idywr.kr;:. ~ AN!)uA65DCIATES. IHC. z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel Sun Shade Analysis ~ ~ar~c.ua .wi~Mw+«a Proposed Structure November 22,1999 ' " March 21 - 10am . ' . ~ . . '~..7.J'a , . . ~:r:• . ~ . 4 C' i r ~ i" t ~sy i'~ k.: r ~ y~s TM~w e r ~ i ~ x ~C ~ r ! ~ ~ it r 4 ~ , i ~ "°g~' ""''Yr` { ~°,:v k^"~"1 . W ~a I ~d 7 } . 1 i hi i t a~~ ~ ~~.i~~~u ~k l:~~~~' .ls:a y.,.9w'~~'~~r~~~~~ 9~~ r v~"*ik~'~'b:~y ,~~a^~~~ ' ~ i:'~'~~S k~~~~ ~r r,~ . n,~. f ~ m~ ~ d n ~ I~ m ~F 3.. a~q , ~4i s , ~ ~ r a^y,y, r" ~ ~td'~,~ ~-a~r ~ r.+a 7 c r, y~..7~ c~, ~y" 1F', " Z r i a~ 'w,~r°~ a1# M~d~, f'~ F ~ t Ai Ir Aa i ~h 4'~~ C~ "~a r ~ r ~r ~v t i ~ "~..,,i.~',`~~~'et'~,d+~ ~k~9,'~~,` k,i ~ N y h~ §+7 ~ a~ i~ '~"~~r~ ~ ~ ~ w . ~r T.,~. r . iW "3'~ ; r. ~ -S a i i . ~at~ ~ d4 ~ ~ rzs~ ~ ~ ~~i~a V*. . k~~ ~~'~?'+d ~ P e ~ -~as ~t~~wr'~r.~h~ ~~k4~i ~ i d' . 3. u~~ r w ~ ~ rt~ ~,~I~F~ ~~~'~~p~.V rr a~~. yj~ s~~~~~'~~ F': vp,~~'y! ~I'~f,~~J~~ g[*'~ f ,~a5~'I ~ r i i h 5p~~ r~ ~ ~a h~ k .'.it~~ w~~~ ' t' t ~i ~ 3~ ~ C~ ~ ~ %I ti, ~.w..di u~.,.s ~I . a~~ i ~ I'~~ I~ ~ ~I"F~'* i~ ii ~ F.x~ r~~ ry Sh . k i~ . , ...~w i,~~..e , , ~ . ,2 ~ . . . ~ 4 + ~~y hF~a P~ 1~ ~ ~i ai ~~~N ~~r."~ a - T~ , _ , . . d~"iq1~~l~ . } P u ~ ry I - t ~ ~ .I*'~ ~ ~ r " h 9~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~tl~~~~ rk~ ~ ~ ~ ~s 4~ ~ I~~ d ~,'"I~~~ ~ ~ . p'~ ~ ~ I~ ~ t~~ b ~ i~;:4 ,I ~ I~s f~~ a ~i ~ ~ ~ ~9 ~ . , a~~h ~u ~r ~ ~ ~~~.~r~~~ ~ ' ~ ri_ s . ~ y ~ - ~~f6 ~~'y ~y~ V ~I! ~l~ A~ ~~~~~Vk~~~~~2 N 4 ~ d~,~I,S~~k~N~~Y ~f~'•;; . ^M1 v I,y R ~ M I I' ~jsl ~ pr ~ 4 r~I ,6 ~9~ u~ ~ ~~'~I~~`s~~~ ',S ~ p~~ { ~ - ~ ~ ~ tl ;.;1ri{~p kiiRi~~ i~;° ~'ix~ mP~ ~ Olli ~ri ~7h '~y~~; ~~P ; E"' ~td ,~r ~ ~ i ~ . , , ~ ;'r'~ ~ " t ,3. ~ i! ~I "I I ~ I ~i~ ~ ~ I ~~I ~ li ~ i~ , i ~ , r I, ~ I 'I ~ ~ , a~, ;''•&,W . . . ~ . . . ~ ANDn4µ50~1ATF.§: ~~NC ~ z E H R E N vail Plaza Hotel Sun ShadeAnalysis n~~`~~'~ Proposed Structure November 22, 1999 y March 21 - 2pm ' ~ , Attachment H BAILEY & PETERSON A PROt?MONAL CORPORATiON ATroEUVm AT Lnw WB.STS I'ALt BANK BLDG. I.INCOLN CEMBR Y.O. BOX !s9 108 SOUTFI FRONTAGE ROAD WBST, SUTfE 204 16601.INCOLN STRSEC, SU1TE 3175 429 BDWARDS ACCBSS ROAD, SUITE ZOCi VAiI., COLORADO 81657 DIENVER, COLORADO 80264 BDWARDS, COLORADO 81632 TBLBPHONH (970) 476-0092 7'EI.SPHONE (303) 837-1660 TELfiPHO1V6 (970) 9264255 FACSIIVIILB (970) 4764)099 1FACSI1bQLE (303) 837-0097 FACSIMILH (970) 426A296 MEMORA1dTDUM TO: George Ruther FROM: Jay K. Peterson DATE: October 19, 1999 RE: Vail Plaza Hotel Dear George: The purpose of this memo is twofold. First, to set forth our employee housing proposal and, second, to explain the fractional fee concept. 1. Emplovee Housing. Attached to this meYnorandum is our Vail Plaza Hotel staff'ing requirements set forth by departments. The chart I believe is self-explanatory. As you can see, rather that full-time versus part-time, we have used work hours per year which I believe is a more accurate way to calculate staffing requirements. We have calculated our existing staffing requirements the same way, in o.rder to anive at a net increase in employees for the new hotei. This net increase is 105 employees. Our proposal is to provide housing for 30% of these employees. Ideally, from our standpoint, we would like to provide all housing within the Town of Vail. However, because of limited opporlunities within the Town, we would request the option to provide the housing outside the Town limits, if necessary. The numbers would be the same whether inside or outside the Town. 2. Fractional Fee. T'he Vail Plaza Hotel will contain forty-seven dwelling units which will be operated and managed by the owner of the Vail Plaza Hotel. The hotel would sell a maximum of twenty-eight prime winter and/or summer weeks with the hotel managing and operating those weeks for the owners. The remaining twenty-four weeks would remain with the 'i ti - ownership of the hotel and would be managed and operated the same as the hotel. There would be an obligation that the weeks remaining under the ownership of the hotel be available only as a "short-term rental," the same as any hotel room. The number of owners would be limited to a minimum of six and a maximum of twelve, pursuant to zoning requirements. If you have any questions, please call. Jay K. Peterson Attachment 2 .~I I I P,rr WcI nImIaO u anu aCabUnavpaR-Ume) Page 1 , A B C D E F G H PERMANENT STAFF SEASONAL PART-TIME HELP ° woric VPH t hours/ maxi- FUNCTIONS e Pertna- year = Work mum by department _ nent 40 hours peak work staff. hsJweek per days hours 1 employees x 50 peak per per 2 - (note 1) wk/year day year year 3 Lod4inq (hotel & Club) 4 General Manager -1 2,000 5 Assistant manager 4 8,000 6 Guest relations 2 4,000 16 92 1,472 7 Front Office 8 16,000 24 92 2,208 8 Concierge 2 4,000 8 92 736 9 Bell man 2 4,000 48 92 4,416 10 PBX 3 6,000 16 92 1,472 11 Reservations 3 6,000 12 Sales 8 Marketing 4 8,000 13 Accounting 6 12,000 14 Housekeeping supervisor 2 4,000 15 maid service 2 15 30,000 40 92 3,680 . 16 Engineering 9 18,000 24 92 2,208 17 Garage O erations 3 6,000 16 92 1,472 18 Lodging (hotel 8, Club) 64 128,000 17,664 ' 9 Food & Beverage (F86) ,0 manager+host 3 6,000 16 92 1,472 F22 waiters+busboy(1:3 waiters) 11 13 26,000 40 92 3,680 ba r 3 6,000 8 92 736 23 kitchen 16 32,000 24 Room Service: 4 8,000 16 92 1,472 25 Food & Beverage (F$B) 39 78,000 7,360 26 Conference Center 3 3 6,000 8 92 13,248 27 Health Club/SPA 28 reception 4 8,000 29 up keeping 4 8,000 16 92 1,472 30 therapist 482 10 20,000 16 92 1,472 31 exercise room 2 4,000 32 Health Club/SPA 2 20 40,000 2,944 33 Retail (3 shops 6 12,000 16 92 1,472 34 GRAND TOTALS: 132 264,000 42,688 35 hours/year % 100% 16% 36 Average part time help work hours/peak day 464 92 42,688 37 One full time work hours/year 2,000 38 o a pa - ime equiva en o u ime 5 21 39 Grand Total full time equivalent 153 40 Average hours/part time employee/peak day 6 4 41 Number of part time names =(avg hs.per peak day)/(hs/da 7 116 +2 notes 43 continue 44 45 _ vrn vI r%rr WaIllinilviu nllu aabauilnupaii-urnC) F'898 "L " A B C D E F G H 46 note 1: includes "day off" coverage were applicable. ~ 47 note 2: Maid service is based on 10 occupied rooms/maid. Minor occasional fluctuations in 3 demand (less than 100% occupancy) will be covered with overtime of the permanent staff. 49 note 3: Occasional large banquettes will be serviced by the Conference waiter staff and the two shifts 50 restaurant and kitchen staff in over time. 51 note 4: Same therapist may cover more than 1 of the 14 treatment rooms for some treatments. 52 note 5: The total 42,688 seasonal work hoursJyear divided by the regular one fult 53 time employee 2,000 hours/year is = 21 equivalent full time 54 employees. 55 note 6: it is a typical hoursJpeak day of a part time helper. 56 note 7: it is the total part time "names" on the payroll. Evidently depends on the average part-time hoursJpeakday 57 e equiv WI inCrea- 58 Employee Totals VPH WI equiv." se 59 full time 132 132 42 42 60 part time 116 21 32 7 61 total 248 153 74 49 62 * part time at same ratio as VPH . 63 64 VPH STAFFING IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING 65 uses note units quant 66 Hotel units 97 67 Club units 46 68 Hotel + Club 8 units 143 '9 Hotel 8 Club YEAR occupancy 750/o , 0 persons/occupied unit 1.75 71 Hotel + Club population 9 persons 188 72 maid service occup rms/maid 10 73 walk in for lunch or dinner 10 customers/function/day 80 74 Restaurant & bar 11 sf 3,613 75 kitchen 11 sf 3,200 76 Conference 11 sf 7,004 77 Health Club/SPA 17 sf 7,009 78 Retail 11 sf 3,550 79 80 highest demand for restauranUday 81 note lunch dinner 82 hotel 8 Club guests 12 1 1 per 3 nights stay. 83 serves/fundion/day 48 48 84 Walk in customers/functioNday 85 serves/fundion/day 10 80 ers/fundioNday 86 Total serves/function/day 13 128 128 13 serves/waiter/function 87 breakfast is buffet type, served by the same lunch staff. 88 note 8: Hotel 8 Club are staffed as a unified operation 89 note 9: population for the specified number of units, occupancy, persons/room. 90 note 10: all hotel restaurants off the main pedestrian traffic (Ludwig, The Vllager, etc.) rarely (if ever) achieve a high 91 walk in demand.This 80 serves/function/day is a very high assumption. 92 note 11.: all these uses are staffed based on real demand and not based on sq.ft., or seats or any other parameter. 93 note 12: It is established in the business that the restaurant at the hotel never captures more than 1 lunch 4 and 1 dinner per ' 3 nights stay. It is part of guests program to dine out in 95 other restaurants. Vail is plenty of those. 96 note 13: The low ratio of 13 serves/waiteNshift/day indicates that this staff can serve 97 more than 2 times this demand. mwUmum nvLiuAYb Arvu rtAK WEEK ENDS ° 1999 days/ days/peak days holida winter * holida s wk.end total veterana 11-Nov 3 • Thanksgiving 25-NOV 3 2-Dec 9-Dec 16-Dec chrisfims 7 NewYear 7 6-Jan Luther K 13-Jan 3 20-Jan Ash 3 Linc,Val,Pre ]1[3 3 StPatrick 3 K 3 3 Good Fri OEM 7-Apr winter total 35 12 47 Independence 3 3 3 3 3 3 summer total 3 15 18 14Apr 21-Apr 2&Apr Mother's 5-May 3 Armed Forc 12-May 19-May , Memorial 26-May 3 2-lun GrandParen 9-Jun Father's 16,1un 3 23tilun 3 12 Aug 3 19-Aug 3 26-Aug 2-Sep 9-Sep Yom Kipur 16-Sep 3 23-Sep 3aSep Columbus 7-Od 3 140ct 21-Oct Halloween 28-Oct 3 4-Nov 18 9 27 ear total , ~ ~ 9 ' Attachment I , Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Analysis (revised 12/13/99) Table 1: A Comparison of the Parking Requirements for Phase /V Use Area Factor S aces Dwelling.Unit 5,499 sq. ft. >2,000 sq. f.t Town 2.5 Vail Plaza Hotel 2.5 Fractional Fee Ciub 64,094 sq. ft. 500<2,000 sq. ft./>2,000 sq. ft. Town 96.5 Vail Plaza Hotel 96.5 Accommodation Units 36,013 sq. ft. 0.4 spaces/unit + 0.1 spaces/100 sq.ft. Town 75.6 Vail Plaza Hotel 75.6 Restaurant 5,775 sq. ft. 1 space/8 seats Town 48.1 _ 1 space/101.9 sq. ft. Vail P/aza Hotel 56.7 Retail 4,047 sq. ft. 1 space/300 sq. ft. Town 13.5 Vail Plaza Hotel 13.5 Conference/Meeting Rooms 10,368 sq. ft. 1 space/16 seats Town 43.2 Vail P/aza Hotel 43.2 Subtotal (a) Town of Vail Requirement 279.4 Vail P/aza Hotel Pro osa/ 288 Table 2: Existing Parking Requirements for Phases l, I!, lll, 8 V Existing SDD parking spaces (Phases 1,2,3 & 5) 112 SDD Parking Deficit per Ordinance 75 Previously applied multi-use credit 2.5% 4,7 Subtotal (b) Parking requirement for Phases 1,2,3 & 5 191.7 Table 3: Total Parking Requirement for all Phases of SDD #6 (a + b- existing spaces to remain) x multiple use credit = Grand Total Town of Vail Requirement (279.4 + 191.7 - 42) x 0.9 = 386.2 Vail P/aza Hotel Proposal (288.0 + 191.7 - 42) x 0.9 = 393.9 Vail Plaza Hotel Are? SummarY . Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 . • 12/13/99 Proeram Area Level -2 Level -1 Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Leve13 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Total , GrossArea 53,524.00 57,696.00 51,428.00 44,623.00 37,857.40 32,877.00 26,763.00 16,146.00 8,044.00 328,958.00 Dwelling Unit , 3,446.00 2,053.00 5,499A0 ' ClubiJnit 3,822.00 13,966.00 16,163.00 14,390.00 9,801.00 4,718.00 62,860.00 Accommodation Unit 7,415.00 12,396.00 9,504.00 6,698.00 36,013.00 Retail 3,442.00 605.00 4,047.00 ' I.abbY 2,237.00 2,237.00 Restaurant 3,873.00 3,873.00 1.ounge/Bar 674.00 1,228.00 1,902.00 - Conference 3,364.00 7,004.00 10,368.00 Pre-Conviene 2,485.00 2,485.00 4,970.00 Kitchen 0.00 Food and Beverage 0.00 Front Office 2,242.00 2,202.00 Sales/Cater. (multi-use) 0.00 Accounting 1,570.00 1,570.00 Executive Office 0.00 • Receiving/Storage - 0.00 Personnel (office) 0.00 Service Areas 7,971.00 6,318A0 6,444.00 20,733.00 Laundry 0.00 Housekeeping 0,00 , Engineering 0.00 Mechanicai (Plant) 0.00 Mechanical (Rooftop) 117.00 222.00 339.00 S a Lock P( ers) 3,116.50 3,019.00 6,135.50 1 Spa (7'reatment) 2,853.00 2,447.00 5,300.00 Pool Deck 6,266.00 1,392.00 7,658.00 Pool Area 2,774.00 2,774.00 fixercise Rooms 1,246.00 1,686.00 2,932.00 Comdor (public) 225.00 2,328.00 3,740.00 5,795.00 4,342.00 4,359.00 2,912.00 1,592.00 0.00 25,293.00 , Corridar (service) 0.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 151.00 150.00 1,726.00 Core (stair) 285.00 568.00 568.00 466.00 367.00 360.00 269.00 0.00 0.00 2,883.00 Parking (spaces, ramp) 51,462.00 21,498.00 10,273.40 4,114.00 87,347.00 Club Unit Storage Area 0.00 Restrooms/Coats/Etc. 589.00 589.00 589.00 1,767.00 Loading Dock 10,501.00 10,501.00 Service SmraBe 0.00 Maid (Satellitel 0_00 0.00 0.00 192.00 344.00 342.00 344.00 0.00 0.00 - 1.7,22.00 ~ Sub-Total Net Areas 52,122.00 55,45050 49,921.00 41,205.00 35,679.00 30,678.00 24,763.00 14,990.00 7,143.00 312,151.50 Gross-Net (wall) Area 1,402.00 2,245.50 1,507.00, 3,418.00 2,118.00 1,999.00 2,000.00 1,156.00 901.00 16,806.50 ' Gross-Net Factor 97% 96% 97% 92% 94% 94% 93% 93% . 89°k 95°/a ~ i Page IS , Vail Plaza Hotel Leve16 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/ 13/99 Leve16 Gross Square Footage 8,044.00 Dwellina Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Dwelling Unit (upper level) 2,053.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Units Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 42 ([Jpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 43 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.Q0 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 44 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 45 (Upper Level) 648.00 108.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 47 (LJpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 48 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 SuMTotal Club 4,718.00 843.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 12.00 Corridor (public) 0.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Maid 0.00 Core (stair) 0.00 Mechanical (rootion) 222.00 Sub-Total Area 372.00 , Dwelling Unit Net 2,053.00 Club Unit Net 4,718.00 Other Net 372.00 Total Net 7,143.00 NeUGross Difference 901.00 89% Page 1 Vail Piaza Hotel Leve15 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Level 5 Gross Square Footage 16,146.00 Dwelline Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Dwelling Unit (lower level) 3,446.00 340.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00 Club Units Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedtooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 34 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 35 (Upper I.evel) 814.00 ] 47.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 36 (Upper Levei) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 37 (Upper I.evel) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 39 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 42 (Lower Leve]) 913.00 0.00 2.00 100 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 43 (Lower Level) 979.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 44 (Lower Level) 486.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 45 (Lower Leve]) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 47 (Lower Level) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 48 (Lower Level) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club 9,801.00 735.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 32.00 Other Areas Area Corridor (pubtic) 1,592.00 Core (elevator, mech. shaft) 151.00 Maid 0.00 Core stav 0.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 1,743.00 Dwelling Unit Net 3,446.00 Club IJnit Net 9,801.00 Other Net 1,743.00 Total Net 14,990.00 NeUGross Difference 1,156.00 93% Page 2 ~ I Vai) Plaza Hotel Leve14 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 ~ Level4 ~ Gross Square Footage 26,763.00 Club Units Unit Number Area Deck Areai Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 20 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 21 (Upper L.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 22 (Upper L.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 27 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 28 (LTpper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 29 (Upper Level) 1,313.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 34 (Lower Level) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 35 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 36 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 37 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 38 (Flat) 984.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 39 (Lower Level) 980.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 $ub-Total Club 14,390.00 1,215.00 25.00 21.00 3.00 48.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area Unit Type A 372.11 18.00 6,698.00 Other Areas Area Corridor (public) 2,912.00 Care (elevator) 150.00 Maid 344.00 Core stair 269.00 Sub-Total Ot6er Areas 3,675.00 Club Unit Net 14,390.00 Accorrnnodation Net 6,698.00 Other Net 3.675.00 Total Net 24,763.00 NeUGross Difference 2,000.00 93%1 Page 3 Vail Plaza Hotel Level 3 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Leve13 Gross Square Footage 32,877.00 Club Units Unit Type Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 20 (Lower L.evel) 561.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 21 (Lower Level) 1,088.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 22 (Lower I.evel) 995.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 23 (Flat) 991.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit24 (Flat) 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Uttit 27 (Lower Level) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 28 (Lower Level) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Ciub Unit 29 (LowLr Level) 969.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 ClubUnii31 (Flat) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2_00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club Uuits 16,163.00 1,400.00 30.00 23.00 7.00 60.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area Unit Type A 365.54 26.00 9,504.00 Other Areas Maid 342.00 Corridor (public) 4,359.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Core stair 360.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 5,211.00 Totals Club Net 16,163.00 Accommodation Net 9,504.00 Other Net 5,211.00 Total Net 30,878.00 NedGross Difference 1,999.00 94% Page 4 ~ Vail Plaza Hotel Level 2 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 II Leve12 j Gross Square Footage 37,857.00 Club Units Unit Tvae Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 5(F7at) 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 8(Flat) 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 9(F7at) 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 11 (Flat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1.222.00 40_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club Units 13,966.00 1,235.00 27.00 17.00 10.00 54.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area Unit Type A 364.59 34.00 12,396.00 Other Areas Maid 344.00 Corridor (public) 4,342.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Core (stair) 367.00 Rooftop Deck 4,114.00 Sub-Total Other Areas 9,317.00 Totals Club Net 13,966.00 Accommodation Net 12,396.00 Other Net 9317.00 Total Net 35,679.00 Net/Gross Difference 2,178.00 94% Page 5 Vail Plaza Hotel Level 1 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Level l Gross Square Footage 44,623.00 Club Units Unit Tvpe Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 3(Flat) 1.237.00 95_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Sub-Total Club Units 3,822.00 319.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 14.00 Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area Unit Type A 353.10 21.00 7,415.00 Retail Area Retail Three 605.00 Retait Four 0.00 Sub-Total Retail 605.00 Restau['ant Area Occ. Factor Occuoants Main Restaurant (Buffet) 2,155.00 18.00 119.72 Suecialtv Restaurant 1.718.00 25.00 68.72 Sub-Total Restaurant 3,873.00 188.44 Lounee Area Occ. Factor Occunants Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 Other Areas Corridor (public) 5,795.00 Kitchen/Service 6,444.00 Truck Dock/Auto Circ. 10,501.00 Restrooms 589.00 Maid 192.00 Core (elevator) 275.00 Core stair 466.00 SuMTotal Other Areas 24,262.00 Totals Club Net 3,822.00 Accommodation Net 7,415.00 Retail Net 605.00 Restaurant Net 3,873.00 Lounge Net 1,228.00 Other Net 24,262.00 Total Net Area 41,205.00 NeUGross Di[ference 3,418.00 92% Page 6 I Vail Plaza Hotel Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Level 0 Gross Square Footage 51,428.00 Retail Retail One 1,702.00 Retail Two 1,740.00 Sub-Total Retail 3,442.00 Lobbv Bar Area Occ. Fact. Occua• I.obby Baz 674.00 25.00 26.96 Lobbv Area Occ. Fact. Occua• Lobby 2,237.00 30.00 74.57 Administration Front Desk 2,202.00 Accountine 1,570.00 Total Administration 3,772.00 Saa - Men's/Workout Men's Lockers/Facilities 3,019.00 Treatment 2,447.00 Deck 1,392.00 Exercise/Workout 1,686.00 Sub-Totsl Spa 8,544.00 , Conference Area Occ. Factor Occunants Main Bailroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93 Pre-convene 2.485.00 7.00 355.00 Sub-Total Coofereoce 9,489.00 Service Areas 6,318.00 Exterior Circulation Covered Ramp (North) 1,008.00 Covered Auto Entry (West) 5,772.00 Uncovered Entry (West) 1,696.00 Auto Ramp (South) 978.00 Pedestrian Access (East) 819.00 Total 10,273.00 Other Areas Restrooms 589.00 Core (elevator) 275.00 Core (Stair) 568.00 Comdor(Public~ 3,740.00 Total Other Areas 5,172.00 Parkine Provided Valet Spaces 5.00 Page 7 i i ~ I, Vail Plaza Hotel Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc. ~ 961070.00 12/13/99 I I Totals Retail Net 3,442.00 Bar Net 674.00 Lobby Net 2,237.00 Administration Net 3,772.00 Spa Net 8,544.00 Confetence Net 9,489.00 Service Net 6,318.00 Exterior Circulatiott Net 10,273.00 Other Net 5.172.00 Total Net 49,921.00 NebGross Difference 1,507.00 97% Page 8 Vail Plaza Hotel Level -1 Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/ 13/99 Levei Minus One Gross Square Footage 57,696.00 Ssa Area Women's Lockers/Facilities 3,116.50 Treatment 2,853.00 Deck Area 6,266.00 Exercise/Workout 1,246.00 Pool Area 2,774.00 Sub-Totai Spa 16,255.50 Conference Area Occ. Factor, Occuaants Breakout 3,364.00 15.00 224.27 Pre-convene 2.485.00 7.00 355.00 Sub-Total Conference 5,849.00 Service 7,971.00 Other Areas Mechanical 0.00 Corridor(Public) 2,328.00 Core (elevator) 275.00 Core (stair) 568.00 Public Restrooms 589.00 Sub-Total 3,760.00 Parkine Provided SpBCes Area Area/Suace Valet Spaces 7.00 Parking Spaces (Full Size) 41.00 Parking Spaces (Compact) 11_00 Sub-Total Parlung 59.00 21,498.00 364 Totals Area Other Areas Net 3,760.00 Spa Net 16,255.50 Conference Net 5,849.00 Service Net 7,971.00 Parking and Ramp Net 21,498.00 Total Net 55,333.50 NeUGross Differeuce 2,362.50 96% Page 9 f I ~ I Vail Plaza Hotel Level -2 Zehren and Associates, Inc. f 961070.00 12/13/99 i ~ Level Minus Two ~ Gross Square Footage 53,524.00 i ~ Other Areas Mechanical 0.00 Corridor (public) 225.00 Core (elevator) 150.00 Core stair 285.00 Sub-Totai Other Areas 660.00 Area Valet Spaces 125.00 Parking Spaces (Full Size) 65.00 Parking Spaces (Co act 2.00 Sub-Total Parldng 192.00 51,462.00 268.03 Totals Area Other Net 660.00 Parking and Ramp Net 51,462.00 Total Net 52,122.00 NebGross Dillerence 1,402.00 97% Page 10 Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/ 13/99 Dwellin¢ Units Total Area Park. Factor Park. Redd Dwelling Unit 1 5,499.00 >2000 2.50 Club Units Total Area Factor S aces Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 7(F7at) 1,204.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 8(F7at) 948.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 11 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 500Q000 2.00 Club Unit 15 (F7at) 1,405.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 16 (F1at) 1,222.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 500Q000 2.00 Ciub Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 1,351.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit21 (Two Level) 1,878.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 22 (Two L.evel) 1,785.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit23 (Flat) 1,9821.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit24 (Flat) 1,108.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 25 (F7at) 975.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 27 (Two Level) 1,769.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 28 (Two Level) 1,7691.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 2,282,.00 >2000 2.50 Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226,.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 34 (Two Level) 1,327.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00 Club LJnit 37 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 1,794.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 1,727.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 43 (Two Level) 1,793A0 500Q000 2.00 Club Unit 44 (Two Level) 1,300.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 45 (Two Level) 1,161.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 47 (Two Level) 814.00 500<2000 2.00 Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 500<2000 2.00 Total Club Paridng 64,094.00 96.50 Page 11 Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 Accommodation Units Area Kevs Saaces Factor Total Acc. Units 36,013.00 99.00 75.61 0.76 Restaurant Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Saaces Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44 1:8 seats 23.56 Loun e Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Saaces Total L.ounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 1:8 seats 6.14 Retail Area Factor SpeCes Total Retail 4,047.00 1300 sq. ft. 13.49 Conference Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Saaces Main Ballroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93 1:16 seats** 29.18 Breakout 3,364.00 15.00 224.27 1:16 seats*" 14.02 Total Required Saaces Total Dwelling Unrt 2.50 Total Club 96.50 Total Accommodation 75.61 Total Restaurant 23.56 Total Lounge 6.14 Total Retail 13.49 Conference 43.20 SDD Parking Required (phases 1.2.3.5) * 149.68 Sub-Total Parlung 410.67 Mixed Use Reduction 10% 41.07 Total Parldng Required 369.61 Total Parldng Provided 366.00 Parlung Difterence -3.61 ParkiuQ Provided Full Size Compact Valet Total Facisting SDD spaces to remain* 112 0 0 112 Level Zero Parking 0 0 5 5 Level Minus One Parking 41 11 7 59 Level Minus Two ParkinQ 65 0 125 190 Total Parlring Provided 218 11 137 366 Percentage 60% 3% 37% 100% * SDD Parldna Reauired (nhases1.2.3.5) Existing SDD Spaces 112 SDD Parking Deficit 75 Sub-Total (Current Requirement) 187 Previouly Applied Reduction- (2.5%) 191.68 Currently Dedicated Phase 4 Spaces -42 Total SDD Parldng Required (phases 1,2,3,5) 149.68 **assume 50% internaUpublic transportation/pedestrian traffic - breakout use by bailroom occupants Page 12 Vail Plaza Hote1 Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 ~ Dwelline Units Upper Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows Dwelling Unit 1 2,053.00 3,446.00 5,499.00 340.00 4.00 4.00 10.00 Club Units Upper Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 0.00 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 0.00 1,237.00 95.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 0.00 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 0.00 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 8(Flat) 948.00 0.00 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 0.00 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 11 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 0.00 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 14 (F'lat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 0.00 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1,222.00 0.00 1,222.00 40.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 17 (F7at) 865.00 0.00 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 0.00 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 0.00 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 790.00 561.00 1,351.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 21 (Two Level) 790.00 1,088.00 1,878.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 22 (Two Level) 790.00 995.00 1,785.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 23 (Flat) 991.00 0.00 1,983.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 24 (Flat) 1,108.00 0.00 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 0.00 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 27 (Two L.evel) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 28 (Two I.evel) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 1,313.00 969.00 2,282.00 147.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00 Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 0.00 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 34 (Two Level) 814.00 513.00 1,327.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3:00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 37 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 814.00 980.00 1,794.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 814.00 913.00 1,727.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 43 (Two Level) 814.00 979.00 1,793.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 44 (Two I.evel) 814.00 486.00 1,300.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 Club Unit 45 (Two I.evel) 648.00 513.00 1,161.00 108.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 Club Unit 46 (F7at) 856.00 0.00 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 Club Unit 47 (Two L.evel) 814.00 992.00 1,806.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 992.00 1.806.00 147.00 3.00 100 0.00 6.00 48 Total Club Units 48,061.00 15,041.00 64,094.00 5,953.00 110.00 87.00 22.00 218.00 Page 13 Vail Plaza Hotel Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc. 961070.00 12/13/99 ~ AcCOmmodation llnits Room Area Rooms Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows Total Acc. Uoits 363.77 99.00 36,013.00 0.00 99.00 99.00 0.00 198.00 Residential Totals 105,606.00 0.00 213.00 190.00 22.00 426.00 Restaurant Seatine Area Occ. Factor Seats Main Restaurant 2,155.00 18.00 119.72 SoecialtvRestaurant 1,718.00 25.00 68.72 Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44 Lounee Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 Lobby Baz 674 25 26.96 Conference Facilites Seatine Area Occ. Factor Seats Main Ballroom 7,004 15 467 Breakout 3,364 15 224 , Pre-Convene 4 970 7 355 Total Convention 15,338 Spa Level Zero 8,544.00 Level Minus One 16 55.50 Total 24,799.50 Retail Retail One 1702 Retail Two 1740 Retail Three 605.00 Retail Four 0.00 Total Retail 4,047.00 Adminstration 3,772.00 Page 14