HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-12-07 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session ~
~VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1999
7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
. REVISED AGENDA
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to
determine at what time Council will consider an item.
1 • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. (5 mins.)
2. CONSENT AGENDA: (5 mins.)
A. Approve the Minutes from the meetings of November 2 and 16,
1999.
3. Appoint Two Members to the Vail Local Marketing District Advisory
Pam Brandmeyer Board. (5 mins.)
4• Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1999, first reading of An Ordinance Making
Steve Thompson Supplemental Appropriations And Budget Adjustments From The Town Of
Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, And Health Insurance Fund Of
The 1999 Budget And The Financial Plan For The Town Of Vail, Colorado;
And Authorizing The Expenditures Of Said Appropriations As Set Forth
Herein; And Setting Forth Details In Regard Thereto. (15 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/Modify/Deny Ordinance
No. 34, Series of 1999, on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This is the final supplemental
appropriation for 1999. Supplemental appropriations are needed to
account for expenditures that were not anticipated when the budget was
originally prepared.
Many of the Town's required supplemental appropriations are caused by
and funded by unanticipated revenue such as grants and sales. All of the
supplementals in the General Fund are of this type.
Supplementals are also needed for unanticipated expenditures such as
the upgrade to the permits software for $66,000.
The balance of supplementals is needed for expenditures that will exceed
budget estimates such as the $120,000 needed for health claims. As you
may recall, we are self-insured for health claims and must pay what is
incurred up to a certain point. For many years, our health claims had
done much better than budget, but not this year.
. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1999
on first reading.
5• Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1999, first reading of an Ordinance rezoning
Dominic Mauriello for property previously unzoned and owned by the United States Forest
Tom Moorhead Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land
Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Prima ry/Seconda ry Residential
District and Natural Area Preservation District (NAPD), for property
located at Rockledge Road/ A replat af a portion of Block 7, Vail Village
First Filing and Lot 2 of Raether minor subdivision affecting lots 2, 4, 7,
8A and 9A, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing; Lots 3A and 3B,
Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 10A,
Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 13B
Resubdivision of Lot 13 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; and Government
3
Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian.
and
A rezoning for property previously unzoned and owned by the United
States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the
Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary
Residential District and Natural Area Preservation District (NAPD), for
property located at Ptarmigan Road/ Lots 1 through 6, Block 5, Vail
Village Seventh Fi(ing, replat of Lot 4, Vail Village Tenth Filing and
Government Lot 3; all in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of
the Sixth Principal Meridian. (45 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCIL: Approve/Modify/Deny
Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1999 on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: See attached memo.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the zoning
requests subject to the following finding: ,
That the proposed zone districts are compatible with and suitable
to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan
and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area.
6. Ordinance No. 36, Series of 1999, an ordinance amending Title 10, Building
Gary Goodell Regulations, of the Municipal Code, to provide for some relatively minor
updates and "clean-up" amendments to the town's adopted building codes.
The ordinance is tentatively scheduled for 2"d reading on December 22 and
is proposed to be effective for all building permit applications received after
January 1, 2000. (10 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions or
deny Ordinance No. 36, series of 1999, on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The model codes that are administered. by
the town shoufd be updated on a regutar basis in order to stay current with
changing construction technologies and the latest nationally recognized
minimum safety standards. Major new editions of the 8 model codes that
the town adopts are published every 3 years. The town updated its building,
fire, mechanical and plumbing codes to the most current editions with
Ordinance 98-19, which became effective 1/1/99.
The National Electrical Code, or NEC, is published on a slightly different
schedule. It is proposed that the town adopt the most recent 1999 edition
of the NEC to replace our current adoption of the 1996 NEC. In addition, a
number of "clean up" amendments are proposed to eliminate some
inconsistencies in the current ordinance, which is found under Title 10 of the
Town Code.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Building Safety & Inspection Services
Division Team recommends that the Town Council APPROVE Ordinance
No. 36, Series of 1999, on first reading.
7• Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance
Providing for the Levy Assessment and Collection of Town Ad Valorem
Property Taxes Due for the 1999 Tax Year and Payable in the 1999
Fiscal Year. (5 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCIL: Approve/Modify/Deny .
Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999 on second reading.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999
on second reading.
!
0.
An evening work session to present the redevelopment proposal for the Vail
George Ruther Viltage Inn. The purpose of the meeting is to update and inform the Council
Tim Losa of the various aspects of the redevelopment application. (1 hr.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Engage in a dialogue with the
applicant and the staff regarding the future redevelopment of the Vail Village
Inn.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The applicant has appeared on numerous
occasions before the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission '
and the Design Review Board for work sessions and conceptual reviews to
discuss. the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Village Inn, Phase IV
building. The applicant is proposing a major amendment to Special
Development District #6 and a conditional use permit to allow for the
construction of the Vail Plaza Hotel and the operation of a fractional fee
club. During the discussions, the Commission and the Board have provided
. input, expressed their concerns and have recommended various
alternatives. A summary of the issues discussed to date is attached for
reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Engage in a dialogue with the staff and the
applicant to seek information and understanding of the current application
and proposal. Staff anticipates that the applicant will be before the Planning
& Environmental Commission for a final recommendation on December 13
and will be before the Town Council in mid - late December for a work
session to continue discussions and to progress through the development
review process.
9. Proposed public process for development of a master plan/community
Dominic Mauriello facilities plan for ponovan Park. (5 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCIL: Acceptance of
proposed process and schedule for development of a detailed master plan
for ponovan Park.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town has entered into a contract with
Odell Architects, Design Workshop, and Sasaki Architects to develop a
master plan and building plans for ponovan Park. This contract includes a
public process for arriving at decisions during the planning process. The
public process to begin in mid December includes: a programming work
session with stakeholders, public open houses (two) to confirm prioritized
program, public open houses (two) to provide input on potential design\site
plan alternatives, presentations on preferred alternative to the DRB, PEC,
Town Council, and public, and a series of hearings with the PEC, DRB, and
Council to approve final plans.
A detailed schedule will be presented to the Town Council at the meeting.
10. Town Manager's Report. (5 mins.)
11. Adjournment - 9:40 p.m.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL T1MES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TQ CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/14/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12121/99, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/21/99, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice
or 479-2356 TDD for information.
COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP
TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
1999
11/16/99 TIMBER RIDGE UPDATEI
OVERLAY AFFORDABLE
HOUSING ZONE DISTRICT
Chuck Ogilby
11116/99 HOT WEDNESDAY NIGHTS
Kevin Foley
11/16/99 THANK YOU LETTERS TO BOB/TOM: Schedule Executive Session update re: Timber
ELECTION COMMISSION Ridge. What is the timing on presentation of the "affordable
Ludwig Kurz & Council housing zone district" formation?
LARRY PARDEEIGREG MORRISON/LORELEI: Requests Everything, with the exception of the police support, has been done. You
from the WF were made approximately 90 days ago to will note an item in the 12/7199 work session agenda to request either
support these free concerts and to include the following: Council contingency or supplemental appropriation funding to provitle
2 officersl3 hoursl18 nights (5:30-8:30 P.M.) - still being security coverage for the 18 free concerts.
discussed;
Barricades/trash removal - scheduled by Public Works;
2-20 AMP electrical circuits at CheckPoint Charlie - this
upgrade has already installed by Public Works;
5 Special Events Permits - the town has up to 10 Special
Events Permits (liquor licenses) during a calendar year. 5
have been provided to the Foundation for these events.
LORELEI: Asked that we prepare a thank you letter wlhis
signature to thank Mary Jo Allen and Karen Morter for their
past service on the election commission, and again, for
agreeing to continue to serve in that capacity.
December 2, 1999, Page 1
PUBLIC NOTICE
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE
(as of 11 / 19/99)
DECEMBER,1999
In an attempt to respond to scheduled meeting demands, as well as adhere to mandated ordinance and
charter requirements, Council meetings are scheduled at the following times:
EVENING MEETINGS
Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each month, starting
at 7:00 P.M. These meetings will provide a forum for citizen participation and public audience for
conducting regular Council business.
WORK SESSIONS
Work sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues before the
Council, will now be scheduled to begin at 2:00 P.M. (unless otherwise noted) on everv Tuesday
afternoon.
THE DECEMBER 1999 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE
IS AS FOLLOWS:
Tuesdav. December 7 1999
wOI'1{ SeSSIOri............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda)
Evening meeting......... 07:00 P.M.
Tuesday, December 14 1999
WOI'1{ SeSSIOri............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda)
Tuesda December 21 1999
WOPk SeSSlOri............ 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda)
Evening meeting......... 07:00 P.M.
Tuesdav, December 28 1999
Work session............ NO MEETING DUE TO HOLIDAYS
TOWN OF VAIL
~
Pamela A. Brandmeyer Assistant Town Manager '
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
EAST VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Officers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm
Directors - Judith Berkowitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie Caulkins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder
To: Town of Vail - Town Council
From: Jim Lamont, Executive Director
Date: December 7, 1999
RE: Vail Plaza Hotel Special Development District Amendment Proposal
The Association's primary concerns with the proposal fall within two general categories.
o Impact upon the public traffic circulation and Vail Village loading & delivery systems.
o Compliance with prior conditions of approval, Vail Village Master Plan, underlying zone district
reqmrements, and the relationship with adjacent properties and improvements
The following is recommended to provide sufficient information to make an informed recommendation to the Town
Council with respect to these primary concerns. These recommendations will have consequences for setbacks, pedestrian
and vehicular circulation, building heights, off site impacts and related matters.
1. The Town of Vail should commission an analvsis bv a traffic-consulting firm to provide a second and
independent oqinion with resnect to traffic circulation and safetv issues for the Main Vail roundabout Vail Road
and the South Frontage Road. The analvsis should provide design options to resoIve traffc circulation and safetv
issues resulting from increased densities approved for Vail Village.
The South Frontage Road and Vail Road are critical vehicular links to Vail Village and its surrounding residential
neighbarhoods. Currently on Vail Road, during-periods of high traffic, vehicles turning into private driveways can
quickly cause the back up of north and southbound traffic. This circumstance causes particular concern for the
consequences affecting the main Vail roundabout. Approving minimum building setbacks along Vail Road removes any
future option to make unprovements to provide for an efficient and safe traffic flow as well as for an aesthetically
appealing presentation to the Vail Road corridar. Allowing large trucks, buses and cars exiting the Phase I parking
structure and the site's loading & delivery ternunal to exit by crossing against east bound traffic on the South Frontage
Road, near the east exit of the Main Vail roundabout, creates the potential far an unnecessary traffic hazard.
2. An independent analvsis should be conducted to determine the size and configuration of necessarv
facilities to be provided on the Vail Plaza Hotel site and methods of appropriate compensation required to mitigate
off srte impacts upon the Vail Village loading and deliverv svstem.
The growth in the visitor population due to increases in, (recently approved or under consideration) densities for
Vail Village and Lionshead will result in a greater demand upon the loading and delivery system for Vail Village. The
negative aspects of the current loading and delivery system are adverse to the economic and environmental well being of
Vail Village and its surrounding residential neighborhoods. The mitigation of the cumulative effects from redevelopment
resulting from increases in the visitor population from the Vail Plaza Hotel and other similar properties is anticipated
through regulatory provisions providing for the mitigation of off site impacts upon the loading and delivery system.
3. The intended interconnection between the Vail Plaza Hotel and the earlier phases of the Special
Development District, of the parking structures, points of access and circulation routes, aloni! with accompanving
repairs and improvements should be required or adeQUate measures to mitigate the resultini! effects should be
provided bv the apnlicant and confirmed bv an independent consultant.
The lack of the interconnection of interior circulation routes between earlier phases of the Special Development
District and the proposed Vail Plaza Hotel places an inappropriate and unnecessary burden upon traffic circulation on
adjacent public nght-of-ways. Further, the configuration causes the unsuitable mixing of types of vehicles, reducing the
efficiency and safe operation of on-site loading and delivery facilities. The interconnecnon of these routes and points of
access was anticipated and provided for in the design and construction of the earlier phases. No agreements restrain or
preempt the Town from requiring these interconnections.
4. A summarv of compliance criteria imuosed upon earlier uhases of the Special Develoument District and
a report on the deEree of deviation and the iustification thereof from these criteria should be nrovided to the Town
Council.
The compliance criteria, such as the view corridor defined in the initial Special Development District established
for the site, were unposed upon the former owners and adjacent property owners. The rational and criteria applied for the
Post Office Box 238 Vail, Colorado 81658
Telephone: (970) 827-5680 Message/FAX: (970) 827-5856
. 12/V7/1777 10:~9:13 li ~.3
. .
setting aside of the compliance criteria is a matter of fair, consistent, and equal treatment for former owners, adjacent
property owners and all property owners in similar circumstances. Compliance criteria include documents and decisions
with respect to various phases of the Special Development District, the Vail Village Master Plan, the underlying zone
district and collateral requirements placed on adjacent properties. The documentation of changes and amendments to the
Special Development Disirict has been reported. However, the deviation or negation of compliance criteria has not been
justified as to wazranted changes in conditions, resulting effects, and the public pwpose served.
The Association has given testimony to the Planning and Environmental Commission regarding the foregoing tnatteis
within the context of the work sessions they have conducted with res~ect to this item. As the authority to initaate action
on several of these matters falls ouiside the jurisdiction of the Commission or sta~ they are presented to Council so as to
respect its need to give timely consideration to the concems raised by the Association It is respectfully suggested that
. because there are a sufficient number of new Towri Conncil members, ceriain reports by consultants and staff with respect
to this proposal should be presented and considered as a qual~er to finalizing the Couacil's advisory comments. The
fonner Council, due to the pending expiration of their terms, demurred on making advisory comments, seeming to choose
. instead to forward the responsibility to the newly elected Council. The Association is piepared to give additional
supporting testimony with respect to these matteis.
ll
TOWN OF VAIL ,
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
December 9, 1999
J. Drew Rader, P.E.
PO Box 780
Avon, CO 81620
RE: Correspondence of December 1, 1999 ,
Dear Mr. Rader:
Thank you for your letter of December 1, 1999 regarding the 425 GRFA credit found in the ToNvn Code. To
clarify the issue, I researched the ordinance that created the 425 sq. ft. credit. Prior to 1990, there were
credits for storage, airlocks, wood storage, and 50 sq. ft. for mechanical space. In 1990, an ordinance was
passed lumping all of these uses into a single 425 sq. ft. credit which allowed- the land owner to decide how ro
use the floor space. The regulation did not include a"minunum area" for mechanical space.
The Community Development Department believes you have discovered a major shortcoming of development
trends in Vail.. Too much emphasis is being placed on floor area by property owners and not enough on
building safety. This issue is important and should require properry owners, architects, and engineers to
adequately address mechanical space on development plans. However, we believe that this is best
accomplished by architects and engineers, like yourself, educating clients on the minimum mechanical space
requirements of the Building Code. The Building and Mechanical Codes contain specific regulations on the
minimum space needed depending on the size of the mechanical equipmenL We can all do a better job of
communicating existing Building and Mechanical Code provisions to applicants, rather than creating new
regulations in the Zoning Code.
If you wish to pursue a code amendment on your own, you have the right to submit the appropriate
application form and fee to the Town of Vail and we will forward the application to the Planning and
Environmental Commission and to the Town Council for their consideration.
If you have any questions, please call me at 479-2148.
Sin ely,
.
Do ~c F. auriello, AICP ,
Chief of Planning '
C: Town Council
~,s~ RECYCGED PAPER
~ -
~ ~ . . .
December 7, 1999
Mr. Dave Ozawa • .
U. S. Forest Service '
PO Box 190 . '
Minturn, CO 81645 Dear Mr. Ozawa: . I represent two condominium associations in Vail Village which border Vail Road. T'hey are - '
Riva Ridge South and The Willows Condominium Associations.
This purpose of this letter is to voice their dispieasure with the CAT III Timber Hauling Route
for the summer months in the years 2000 and beyond. This is the route proposed down the front
side of Vail Mountain, down Mill Creek road, along Vail Road and through the Roundabout onto
. I-70: We are requesting that the timber hauling not be along Vail Road directly behind our "
. properties. .
This past summer the construction traffic on Vail Road was very noisy and dusty. Many owners
and guests complained about the noise and the volume of traffic on this raad. This is a
residential neighborhood with units occupied on a nightly basis. The truck traffic started very
early in the mornings when people were sleeping and had their windows open since it was
szunmer. The disruptions to our guests and owners were numerous. , . The property owners here purchased in this location because it was quiet and private. You are
proposing under this alternative to disrupt and cause financial harm to these owners. Therefore, we request that you seek an alternative to this timber hauling route. At this point,
bridging over the wetlands seems like the best altemative from your report.
• Sincerely, ' .
WILLOWS CONDOMINIUMS RIVA RtDGE SOUTH CQNDOMINIUMS Barbara Feeney, CHA . General Manager RECEIVED DEC 91999
' Cc: All effected homeowners - , WILLOWS
' C O N D O M 1 N 1 U M S
74 Willow Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 • 888-WILLOWS (945-5697) • 970-476-2233 • 970-476-5714 fax
email: willows@vail.net • http://vail.net/willows '
Memorandum
To: Vail Town Council
From: George Ruther, Senior Special Projects Planner
Date: December 7, 1999
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel - Information Update
The purpose of this memorandum is to update the Town Council on the progress of the development review of the
Vail Plaza Hotel, to inform the Council of the issues discussed to date, to forward the preliminary recommendation
of the Design Review Board and to identify the next sfeps in the development review process.
ISSUES DISCUSSED TO DATE
The Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board have held numerous
worksession meetings and conceptual reviews to discuss the proposed major amendment to Special Development
District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. The major amendment is intended to facilitate the construction of the Vail Plaza
Hotel. Over the course of the meetings and reviews the Commission, Board and staff have had the opportunity to
comment and provide feedback to the applicant on the redevelopment proposal. The Commission and Board
comments are based upon review and consideration of the relevant governing land use regulation documents. Staff,
while taking into consideration the land use regulations, has focused primarily on the technical aspects of the
proposal (i,e., development standards, zoning compliance/analysis, engineering standards).
The following is a summary of the comments and discussions to date:
Vail Road Setback
In general, the Commissioners disagreed with staff's concem that the proposed fiotel should be required to maintain
the required twenty-foot setback along Vail Road or at a minimum meet the criteria recently established for
determining setbacks for developments located in the Public Accommodation zone district. The Commissioners
believed that the setback was appropriate given the existing development on adjacent properties. Several
Commissioners did express an interest, however, in reviewing a landscape plan to insure that the streetscape along
Vail Road can be adequately provided and that the applicant address the setback criteria and demonstrate why a
setback encroachment should be granted. Since the Commissioners last saw the plans and had an opportunity to
comment on the proposed Vail Road setback, staff has discovered a discrepancy in the survey information provided
by the applicant. The discrepancy in the survey data does not affect the proposed distance of the hotel from the
property line (setback), however, the proposed distance between the hotel and the street has decreased from earlier
submittals. ?'he minimum distance proposed from the back of the curb is approximately 16'-6" and the maximum
distance is approximately 26'. The width of the right-of-way (back of curb to the property line) is approximately
10'-6". A reduced copy of the Vail Road Setback Study prepared by the applicant has been attached for reference.
Building Height
The staff had identified a concem with the proposed height of the hotel on several portions of the development site.
Generally, staff believed that the applicant should be required to mitigate the negative effects of the proposed hotel
height.through design considerations. However, upon reviewing the plans, the Commissioners believed that the
proposed height of the hotel was acceptable. Several Comrriissioners did indicate that certain areas of the hotel did
not respect the existing development on adjacent properties and suggested that the applieant continue to explore
F:\everyone\council\memos\99\wi1207 1
solutions to the problem. Of greatest concem was the height of the hotel in relation to the residential uses in the
Gateway Buildirig and that the hotel turned its back on the Gateway Building. In this particular location the relative
height of the hotel is approximately 68' tall. "
Greenspace/Pedestrian Circulation
This particular issue generated the most discussion. The Vail Village Inn Special Development District
contemplates an interior courtyard partially surrounded by commercial development. The courtyard is intended to
serve the guests and visitors staying within the Vail Village Inn as well as accommodate pedestrian traffic off of
East Meadow Drive. The Commissioners are most concemed that the proposal does not provide adequate pedestrian
circulation tlu-oughout the District. The applicant has been asked to review the site plans and seek opportunities to
improve circulation. Possible improvements suggested by the Comrnissioners included reducing the size of the pool
deck area, increasing the walkway widths near Phases I& II, introducing more retail frontage to the courtyard,
creating a better pedestrian connection to the Gateway Building, raising the finish elevation of the pool deck,
revising the towe,r design at the south entrance to the hotel and repairing the pavers within the District. Since the
Commissioners last reviewed the site plans relative to pedestrian circulation the proposed site plan has been
redesigned. The purpose of the redesign is to accommodate pedestrian circulation as requested. The Town of Vail
Design Review Board has seen the redesigned plans and has passed along favorable comments to the applicant.
Building Entrance on Vail Road
The Comrriissioners generally believed that the proposed entrance design on Vail Road was acceptable. Several
Commissioners clid request that the applicant present additional drawings and details of the proposed entrance
design at the next meeting. Depending upon the information submitted, improvemenfs to the entrance maybe
requested. The concern with the entrance is that it may lack a sense of arrival and that vehicles could not adequately
maneuver within the designated area. Since the plans were last presented to the Commission the applicant has
redesigned the area at the building's entrance off Vail Road. Staff is currently reviewing the plans to determine
whether the Comrnission's concems were addressed.
Accommodation Unit Requirement
Over the years the Town has consistently required that accommodation units be provided in Pbase N of the Vail
Village Inn. The required number was once as high as 175 units. The existing ordinance requires no fewer than 148
accommodation units. The applicant's proposal includes 99 accommodation units and 48 part-time fractional club
units for a combined total of 147 units. The Comrnissioners believed that given the types of units proposed and the
anticipated operation of the fractional fee club units, that the spirit and the intent of the requirement was essentially
being met.
Parking Requirernent
The applicant is proposing to provide parking spaces within the new hotel. These spaces are in addition to the 42
hotel spaces that are already provided and will remain in the parking structure beneath the Phase III Condominium
Building. Therefore, the total proposed parking spaces for the hotel is 290 parking spaces. The total number of
parking spaces proposed for the entire Special Development District is 366. There is an existing requirement that 75
additional spaces be provided as part of the redevelopment of Phase N to meet an existing deficit within the
District. Pursuant to the Zoning Regulations, 386 parking spaces are required of the hotel development. With the
exception of the 75 required spaces, there is no change in the number of spaces provided for remainder of the
Dsitrict. Generally, the Commission was favorable with the proposed parking plan. The Commission and staff did
request that the applicant fmalize the pro;ram of the uses within the hotel so a more accurate parking requirement
could be established. Staff anticipates discussing this matter in greater detail with the Commission and the
applicant.
Development Standards Deviations
F:leveryonelcouncil\memos\99\wi 1207 2
The applicant is requesting to deviate from the prescribed development standards of the Public Accommodation
Zone District. According to the Zoning Regulations, in part, deviations from the prescribed standards may be
approved by the Town of Vail upon a finding by the Town Council that the negative impacts associated with said
deviations are outweighed by the public benefit gained. In the case of the Vail Plaza Hotel, The requested deviations
are, building height, setbacks and parking. The applicant is proposing an additiona125' of building height, up to 19-
foot encroachments in to the required 20-foot setbacks and 20 fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning
Regulations. The exact number of parking spaces has not yet been determined as a final building program has not
been provided for review. If deemed appropriate, the Council will need to make a finding to the affect that any
negative impact associated with requested deviations is outweighed by the public benefit gained.
Emplovee HousinQ The applicant is proposing to provide employee housing for a percentage of the "new" employees resulting from the
hotel construction. Based upon an analysis completed by the applicant and provided to the Community
Development Department, the new hotel is expected to generate 105 "new" employees. The "new" employees are
in addition to the 74 employees already working full-time or part-time at the Vail Village Inn. The applicant is
proposing to provide deed-restricted employee housing for 30% (32) of the "new" employees. Due to the
unavailability of private vacant land resources within the Town limits, the applicant anticipates that all or a portion of the deed-restricted housing will be provided in an out-of-town or down-valley ]ocation. In order to maximize the
benefit of the housing to the Town of Vail, the applicant has suggested that the housing will be available only to
Vail Plaza Hotel employees. It is further anticipated that some form of transportation will be provided to the
employees from the out-of-town or down-valley location to the hotel. The Planning & Environmental Cominission
has briefly discussed the employee housing alternatives with the applicant and expressed that, based upon the
information provided to date, the proposal seems reasonable and appropriata. Staff will be discussing the matters of
employee housing with the applicant in greater detail. Staff and the Planning & Environmental Commission will be
providing a final recommendation to the Town Council.
Loading & Deliverv
The loading and delivery alternatives have been discussed at length throughout the development review process by
each of the parties involved. The Council has expressed concerns regarding aesthetics, capacity/adequacy and
public safety. The Design Review Board has expressed concems that the loading and delivery facility must be
incorporated into the design of the hotel and that it be aesthetically pleasing. The staff has reviewed the technical
aspects of the design (slope, turning radii, access, etc.) and forward comments to the appiicant. The Planning &
Environmental Commission has stated that the concept appears appropriate, however, the vehicle
maneuvering/circulation and public safety concems must be addressed. The staff and the Commission have
requested that the report of the consulting traffic engineers be amended to include analysis and recommendations on
the circulation and public safety concerns. As greater information is provided and design alternatives are generated,
further discussions will occur.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATION,
On Wednesday, December 1, 1999, the Town of Vail held a meeting to review and to make a preliminary
recommendation on the Vail Plaza Hotel to the Vail Town Council. Based upon the review of the plans, including
numerous conceptual review discussions, the Design Review Board of the Town of Vail has recommend approval of
the hotel proposal. Please refer to the attached memo dated 12/1/99 for details.
NEXT STEPS The next step in the development review process is a request for a final review and recommendation from the
Planning & Environmental Cominission to the Vail Town Council. The fmal review and recommendation is
scheduled for Monday, December 13. The applicant is then requesting another worksession with the Town Council
F:\everyone\council\rriemos\99\wi1207 3
on December l4`h Staff anticipates that provided any unforeseen delays, the Council could be reviewing and
considering an amending ordinance in early January of 2000.
F:\everyone\council\memos\99\vvi1207 4
J
~
~ r .
, ,
~ ; ~
_ .
. : ~.~z....
r"
I-70 Frontage Road
,
s
,
_ N'
Gateway Building Vail Village Inn ~ I
Building B '
L . i; Phase III
.
. . . . , 3 ~
. ~ .
N~4
`
. ~ 7 f ~r ~ ~ ' ~ ? .
, , Building A ~ ~ ~ ~
~
a e J Vail Village I n
( 1°,• r ~~~~~~QQ ( hase I Phase Phase III
a ~
~s. \
~ y a v' Circulation Legend
ase
A I C
B
: .
~External Pedestrian
Vail Village Inn _
East Meadow Drive
Phase V ~ .
Internal
~ . -
G
. ;
' `?y Vehicular
Z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel ?
L roo5b„0~::~ES,Ia,NC[ Circulation Plan
Vafl, Colorado IVot to Scale
Scplember 27, 1999
, ,
, . , . 1 I h .
. . ~
. . 1 ~ ~
. ` r .
` .
. ' ~ . . .
. ~ i l..o,~.~ . . .
, ' ~ , . : ' ~ ' -
~r
. ,
. . . , . - - _
,
.
'
~ ' -
, . \ . . . . -
. . . .t . ~i" l
. . _ ~ ~ ~ -
~ . -
. _ . J. . . _ .
~A
I
~ . ..+a . ~ . . ~ -
u+.c
' , , ' ~ 'TR. ..-f^^i.. ~ • ~J .
~F.'
~
I , . . . , ,
'
, ~
, , .
s -
-
,
_ -
; .
.
1 ` * ~ ~ . ~ . : • . r ~ ~ ~v .i .
. . _ ~ .
. ` ~ 'r'ir~-• r ~ i
t ~ ~ pY.. €4 \ \ ~ ~ ~m ~'r 3~A!;.. sr .
.~j
~C~ ~
/ ~ ' ~ i q ,.i?' ' ~ ~ P y ~ ~ " `
~ .
,
t ~ ' ~ I i ~ / \ / ~ ,
a
" _ • . ~r~.t l'.. ~ . ' , ,~s ~Pe / ..F`~mc, ~ - . _ ,
' .
LL.: ~ ~~~'k,l F,~~ ~ ~ ~ Tp 41 . . .
, " , . / . , .
1 'git N
`;''r 01 . ` ' - ~c s~~ ~ ri l•, " .
~ zOE H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel Site Vignettes
~ ANo a~i6O~cewµg,'I~NC.
vail, Colorado Key Plan
November 23, 1999
A PLAZA PROMENADE
~ ~.w .
• Access point into promenade area
F,.
• Handicap access to alI levels of
promenade.
LANDSCAPE NODE ~ .
• Hardscape/Softscape nodes identify
transition areas along promenade and
mews.
CE~Ii~IONIAI, S''AIR ,
s
• Grand scale transition in promenade
levels.
f S
Iert~~W Mb W~~
1 i . ~4.
HOTEL ENTRY
• Guest and/or pedestrian Access to
r
-r-
hotel & public spaces.
x .
.
. , .
_.._..,s."'._,.~..._-.~.
OPIAZETTA
• Garden plaza at pool for hotel Guests
~
~
Z E H R E N
AND cS50CIATES. INC. Vail Plaza Hotel Site vignettes
L ( niiEV]akreE.IIAN~N'xG
HTERIOPB • uhosG~ve ~ncHtr[ct~rtE
~
Vail, Colorado
~ November 23, 1999
PLAZA
• Outdoor dining & Seating area
• Major activity center
~ .
TRANSITION SPACE
• _
.
>
Mat
erial, grade, changes signal
change in space and scale.
t' K t r t*•,~ r
m,. !
s•~~. ( +~Y~, s3a;, S i~' , { y ,~`~,'fn Y p
MEws
1~ IH~IJ ' ~ I'~ ~ ~ 1
• Garden paths create connections be-
tween spaces. .~~-ti; ;
~
PORTAL
• Architectural elements signal entries
into changing spaces.
~ A,
~~fi PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
• Paving patterns identify pedestrian
~
connections between new & existing
spaces.
. ! ~YC
~ z E H R E N
~ ANDo~SSOC~IAiES. '
INC. vail Plaza Hotel Site Vignettes
Vp~~e ncv~r
~ EGIURE
u.~e.~..
Vail, Colorado
~ November 23, 1999
~
Fu6~r~,l~la~mi
4~IIj~~il~~~~~.:~"~.. ;
~ i rl r'
,t
i *
9
,,a~ t~~4~ I7IMYr~hI~P ; ' k 5
,
I l~gj`~~~~I~~
;
P V .
I
~li. ~ ~ }r.. y ~3•
14
~I
r~
~
f~ a
' ~I a..Y..,.
I ~,~f Y~ r* t d4~ d
~
my~:~ ~R r Y Ilw N..~r ~j
~
7 p. g
~
F.
~
1
I
.
-
, +t R
. Wrt
~ h . . ~ .
~
. I
I I
I .CM4GFYMM, Z E 1-1 f's L N
7''~ [ ~1,t7AY?~L.~ r~'+~,~ Wrry[ / i'l
e~v ~ .
F~4~~.i. N J6~~4'r(]~ . ~~~~1. ~.1~,?~41..,(~,
N'all, Co106'adtl
1.J~~ ~ ~st N°lc.~.. ~d+~~~ ~ F ~~~tr~r~ .r~c, f
. .,J. Noa=enifaer2:.j, 1999
~
_ , _ - . -=•T~ _~m._~._. _ ~...a. ~
~ _ .
~I
~
iG
,
,
.
E
~
i • ~ ~ ti
~ ~
,
.
I .
rxe
~
II I 9 ~ _ j ,
. ~ *
;s .
,
. _ . . - _
~
,
~
I.I.
~EPE N ~ Vail P1
;r2 qJ aza Hotel f
. ~ . ,q. Perspective ~?Tiew
~ ~lail, Colorado
Soutli Ea5t 1"laaa
November 23, 1999 ~
i~
„
r`
{ ~ 4y
s ,
~
t . ,W #aXy'yl~l1 dy~l~p~,flo,ar
sl~~i ~ ~ ~'M.~'~-~s4,~ ~ ~sw,~r~~^^y~ TM'1 a~5w~ jii
a +n '
re
, ~ .
.
.
,
_
.
~
y~~~y~ ~ s , • 1 ~
. .l
a ~
~
' ; - - -
.
'
I r
, - '
, , .
,
~
, af.. . k. M .
- i . " .w.. - r. r J I
I
. f
tt!
~
~
4
;
I w N i ~
.
; .
~
,
~
a
.
~
r
~
.
, ~ : , _ ~
; _ . . _
,
„ . ~
. ~
' . , , w . r.'~e~4i... ~
~
E H R LN ~ E
~11 PldZa
~Utel EIevation Study
i~ `Aw1w V`~il, CvEc~t-acf~
rr ~ t~ ~~,~:a~~~l
Pv`c~v c.iTib~.r 23, 1999 N~ ~
,i
~`~FA p~ ~ e y!~ ~s--- - - -
m e
m
I
0
i Building B ~
~
B i
~
1771
~ O
~
t O
O I
i
\
~
ZEHREN ~ p aH Maza Hote~ - ~ ~~~f Man
AND ASSOC1ATB• I"C. Vail, Colorado
"~4'' °010""00 "November 23, 1999 Scale: 1 " = 5014"
m e~vswmn ~,uemMrim
W'~ - - ~ _
45-UL Dwelling
E30 Utit
1 O Upper Level
I 0 O 17dIC'6d' n4&lJ[.'0
0
b~[)L
O-P-9 ~
O
Building H ~
O~
O
O
~ I
o~ i
az•ut, ~
~ @
~ O
~
~ . ~
0
~
~ -
1A ~
L ~
Z E H R E N Va0 0 F0~~a Hotc~~ ~ ~~vd Sox nND nssoanres, iNC. , Vail, Colorado
r.aat ux eval. mLaOAm nNe
~M M~ November 23, 1999 Scale: 1"= 50'-0"
19 RAM't/ IN0711MIpi
• ~
~
~ ~
.1 ~6•F
1
4S-L ~
L r - -
4L AF-
~
I I~
IBuildingB
apy ~ I _ .l.owcqL~wet~ _ I
~ .
r i
L
L
w, •LL
i o0 ' 9 -
I I 1 ~ I I I I - I i O
O I
~ 0
4{[7L S~UL 6{UL 7 \ - - - -
~
~
~
I
~
~
7L
Va~ ~ Maza O ~ ~-il ~ ~ ~dl 0 ~ Il (~o~~ O U ~.(~N( ~ ~ 0 e
nND wssaIArES, iHC. Vail, Colorado
„M.,,o.,r,e,O.
F°'M m1°fAOO Novembet 23, 1999 Scale: 1"= 50'-0"
ie emwmn n~me~r~ao •
o~ ~C~ - - - - ~ sr---
~
0
~
o ~00 ---00 0 H6
~ Hi ~
H2 H3 H4 40-F
HS
r
~
H7 Eito a
o
I HB H9 Q
~ I
t
Hi2 Building~Bxi3 i
i I Hu ~
~
~~L I I I 's J I
o H17
H19 a / I
27-UL 28.UL SrF ` ~ .
~ Mec .Mfaid \
-LL
1 •7P6'
-0
, r-- i
i - ~ O
~
q pF
.
~
o
_ I p~ ~
o - ~ ~ - ,
, ~
~
0
~
m ~p
0 ~o_Ut, :i-tn. z{tn,~
~
~
0 ~ Naza HoteQ Levc~ ~ ~(buu°
Z E o--~ R E N ~~lo
AND AssoaAres, iNC. Vail, Colorado scate: P=50'•0"
N1Q~m ' RA4NN6''"'°m
November 23
nnwx Im Awn, mwuoo nuo ,1999
TBIfT1Mfa1f) PUtO~ONSto~o
U
~ 0
~ o~ 00 0~ 0o H6
M1
H2 H3 W/ MS 31-F .
37 1 0
~ ' H10
I
H7
HA H9 ~
B
H74 ~
oA Hl l
HI ~ %Buil 6~
~
H16
Ht a
mo ~
oun o
0 a.
FE. M.m e
- - aos Boe ty
' O tg
0
om ~
17 H1E M19 M20 H21 H22 H23 H2A O
. O 0
- - - - ~ - - ~
HIS F1I6 14-
'
° IN ~ °La
10 ~
~ 13-F
0
Lk=9
I
)
~ o
!L EIlll REuV Haza'uote~ / ~evd ThUee
AND ASSpC1ATE5, INC. Vdll, Colorado
~ XnW $CdlC: 1°= 50'-0°
~a.rm un nwH
maaoonuo November 23, 1999
~amn.ness~ FMS1aIMLia~a
o 00 om 0° ° ~
H2 H3 H1 H5 L~
16 ~ 1 ti-F
~ H9
I
H6
I H7 HB Q
H13
H1
BuildijB % , ~
M14
o N1 ~
0 FI16
~ I
00 o
o a o a
, = nv n,.ie qs
L2
' O
°e 0 0~ ~o 10 0°
i O
i
-H17 M1E 19 HI H2; M1] ~H2 9'F
LS mO ~O o
Fi24 H25 ~
bF ~ O - - -
I I ~
Building A i ~
I M27 Hxa i
?ue ruo ~
AlTrrl& o gy O
. ~
31 H3 H93 14 35 Ff3 ~
( I
I
09 0090 0m
L-- L------'J .
~
~ , ~ ,
~ Va0 0 Naza'Hotd i~ Leveo Two
ZEHREN Vail, Colorado „
5cale: 1 - 50'-0
AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
AICHrrWTUa • KM~ • WrMM November 23,1999
lA1m! lffa AVON. Q%qR~00 Ni10 ,
79QlOIfMmi) fA1tR1Uf1Y10O
~
~ ~ -----------1_~-
~
~ ~ w„ ~
i '
i
I La6by 1
I ~
I oad'n p
~ Scrviee e
I
,
~ a0 O 00OooQ aOoa~ts0o 0 p
i ~ (~a~su~~ ~ a1F9~^69¢p ~ o ~
~ . . ~ O 00000 ~°~°~°p 0p O a ~ O °o
Lobby ~ .
1 o s c~~0a0
ti ~ o adn~n
m~ m0 ...p oon00.0
o°° ~
° RW~ no~1 oo .
1 F Thrce Upu ~ o 0
~ I
6 O ~otlpOp I~_...
mo - - _ ~
aid 19 . -
H~ HB
1 HIO IIII U / .
Ove ~ ~ • § /
0 uilding A a
xu 9 ,
Ni: s
eB
14 H75 „ -
2
. ~ O F O P ~
~ H16 Ht7 H18 H19 H20 H21
py ~O 6d
I
0m 09 0~ ~
\ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ Ma7 a t ote~ ? L(d Omle
7L E R E I~ ~~1o
AND nssocUTEs, iNC Vail, Colorado
Scale: 1 50'-0"
AMOMMR . WrMon
P.QI~f tA1 AV011. QyOR/i00 lIttO
November 23, 1999
rama«sms> rxe~aw?im
0 4 a ~
a ~
~
~ ~0 0~ 0 0 0o0 S"
000
I
- o ~-o ~-o~ ~ -
, OpQOpo~ ~
a°o°o°a ° o o ° (
I _elo~oe
~
o
~OQOap~
O~o0°o~0
~
~ o
' - Y"by ad"
„ ~ al...,. C=1
O `
gm.
nmwneng
1 a „ ~
_ R@wi a,e o
rvi
/ I
?
~----L-
~ Q _ Aeea111MO OQ N
~ ~ I ~ V•s ' ~ ~
`\J FaROlfloD
L kotd ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Va° o ~ ~~aza ~ Lev~o Ze~°o
nNO wssocIArES, iNC Vail, Colorado
"'°"r'~° • • ~ 5cale: 1 50'-0"
L ~m November 23, 1999
ia massmv rn~mows,m
--~i-------------------
~i
, M.,. I i
c= j
I I
servka ' ~
1 P'°'
Conv~e _ _ ' _ - _ I 1
~
~ ~ ~
Tm~hn~rt
I
i~
° ~r
m• I i
i
~O~ 0 p~ Mabia
1 ai m
1 C•3 CID
CJ ~ i 1 V.I F-N F-I! F.16 F-17 F-II P49 P.70 Fdl C.1
~
c-s ~ I L
' / , 4 ~ • ~ I
c4
_ / " / I r v,
1 C" pwwng
\ J ~
c•e I 1
r I v.s g ~ `
' p_13 I V.1 FJI PJO R39 F•S! F.21 F-36 F35 F-S/ F31 F~S] ~
~ Fu
1 ~ _ 'V!
P-11 ~ I
~ V'' F~13 P-7] F-7a f-I! F.76 FJ7 i-7{ F-)9 P1D E.11
1 F.10 L , Iv-' S> II
1 F'9 NL
r~:... ~ ~
F.e cto r-s w
ea ra v- ~ i~
. 1 C.9
1 ~ \ ~ c-ii ~ Q \ \
~
\
\ \ ~
\ \ i' )
L ~ ~
Z E o-~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1~ ~ F0~171~1 Ho~C~~ U Level Knu§ One
^Na ^SSaUtU, iNC. Vail, Colorado
A20CMN•. pj"No` . "'°"p" Scale: 1 50'-0"
'D'm mi0i"OD Navember 23, 1999
n efqwa~o ramaN.,m
- - r -
y V-104 V-1W V.73 V-73 V.39 V-38 V.1 ~
~
Y-IUS V-102 V.11 V-71 V40 V-31 V•Z
I V-I06 V-101 V-75 V-70 V.41 ~'-3fi V-3 ~
~
V-107 V.100 V-76 Vfi9 Vd2 V-35
V4118 y.gq I i V-77
~ V-fi8 ~ V-A3 ~
~
~ V-1119 V-96 V-~ V-67 V.44 ~ V.JI V-5 I ~
. V-I10 V-97 V-79 V-66 Vd5 V.33 V.R ~
~
V.III V-96 V-BU V.65 V'46
I i V-111 V.93 V.PI V-61 V'47 Y-34 V-H
V-IIJ V-94 V.B2 V-63 VJB V-7U VA I ~
V-1 14 V97 V-B7 V-(2 VJ9 ~ I V-29 V.IU ~
v.us v.sx v-a4 v-si v.sn v.le v-
II
V-116 V.91 V.85 V.60 V.SI V.27 V-12 ~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - J v.yo v-ae v.sv v.sz
L--------------- I
vae v.u I
V-89 v-ev v.se v.53 1
y_]S V.1q I ~
~
~ - ' - - . ' - - - V.9R V421 V.IN V.115 V-24 V.IS I ~
_J JLJLJ ~
v.n v-ia l I
rv4zo,r v-121,r v.izz, v-:z v_n I
F-SS [26 IF-27 FF-39 F.I. FJI F-]1 F-J) ~;N J \1 ~ F-65 y.s~ y.51 V-21 V-~a
F-10 F-11 F-ii ~F-23 ~F-24'
1 F-Ia F.61 v.56 1.55 1 V-]0
I I ~ ~ L
' ~ LF] -6) F-IB F
F17 L F63 F ~R 1 F-09 F-IA Y-47 F•~6 F.IS F~1~ F-13 F-II FJI F-111 F-39
~ F IS `
~
i-I4 ~
~V•11 f-50 FSI F-51 FS] FS~ F~55 F-56 F-57 F-5 F-59 FRU F-61 ~
1 FI]
~ F.n ,u.l ~ \
c.2 I I \ \ ~1
1
F-II F~IO FA FS F-7 F•6 P.5 F-/ F-1 F-2 F-I C•1
1
~
~
~
r-------------~
~ Vao~ Fla'z~
~ ~ o--~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ? Levd Mu na~s Two
Ar,o nssocUTEs, ir,c. Vai1, Colorado Scale:l"=50'-0"
AtaMCIMM '"""46""'H"°"' November23, 1999
r.o.~mc 10n nw~. cvvAoo neo ,
iaeM wsaur rAxemM?iao
.
~
Da~ L~j ^Y
ClLLb ~lam II~~'
I A
`FL-111. I
Hotel ~ I - .Im 201
~
r-
.
Hotel
C
~mm 1 ~~Y ~ nvm - ~ ' I U
. ~ ~IUm 1 1'-~1"
a Retail
•tum 6 -1' reeA
~~I Y
Nm 16. 1
I
~tvm 1 ~mm I
North Elevation East Elevation
ED I n.~
s
~ i.l mmi~iI-o•~ ~1.en I~f,~
~r~ m~~'f~:R" t~•~iouw ~ ~
~
+U I~m~l~. ~1 ~
O~wm I53~~"
West Elevation South Elevation
. L °
~ ~ u--o ~ ~ ~ ~~1~ ~ Naza HotC~~ „Bd:oo0dung A E~edaUons
nNO AssoaArEs, iNC. Vail, Colorado scaie: 1^=50--0°
~-M~
mu)"Do•,w November 23,1999
ieemwsmn /KSTwflflv0
_'-•-'-'~~-ma„v vo::mm_t^ - ' Ctnfi
CIu6 Chb
CIu6 Lt1Ct] Club
Club Hotel
• -Q.n~Y
".Y
9~T6_' _ Club Ctub ~L~t`?~ Hotel Hwel
b~ umllP3'r
~ Hotel Notel Hotcl Haml
I
. ~T63 x P'
Frant Dcsk ~I P. hem Ratail Reuil
mm .
North Elevation East Elevation
Cou rtyard Cou rtyard
a•w~t~~.r - - - - - - -
Clu6 ----~'y
- . ~;•~,r . , . _ . Ctl ~
~7 5~ Tr
Club CIu
6 TH 127 Ctl
Ha~e~ Club Club Club
v~~.n Hatel Hotd ' - ~ ~ - Ctub Cluh ~
e7~.~~ . _ - ' _•__..6.w~~.ft~x'.~~~ ~ _ . ~O"~~
Hol<I Hotel Hotel
Hatel
-.L0
Aecounting Bar fmnlOlTiee P. Lobb B. i Lo6hy
West Elevation South Elevation
Courtyard Courtyard
~ ~ P~~17 ~l "otC~
~ E~uREN Va°
~ Ba~uddoo~g A S
c~~u~u~~
~
AND 11550CIATES, iNC ` Vail, Colorado Scale:l"= 50'-0°
MNNNO - I"TUMIO
Vq{ November 23, 1999
~.4~41 11H A QlO~App M~10
16 MqM?nuf rntO~olsnnoie
- - - - - - - - - ~ - ~.-r~^~ _ M.
~-mani%a~v
ALnelol
l'II-T7'J'~ ~ Q~Ei ~61~Z~ . . - ~
u•rvni91`i"Y 4M nIRR^ - - - "~'P
~~taGt~~, U~ w fAl'7'rY rp~~
.
n M1 iCi~6~Y
North Elevation East Elevation
Club
- ~ - - Club
Cluh
Hutel
- ~ ~ Hotel
Hatel • m ~~P.s~- .
Homl
Hntd ~
_ Wading Area - - - - , .nn Retail
Aetail ~ ~.a
Ge~~ . . ._._._._._.,._._.--feZc
West Elevation South Elevation
L °
ZEHREN . Va0 0 Naza ~~W 4o Buoodo~~ B Uledatoons
AND ASSOCiATES, iNC. Vail, Colorado Scale:l^=so-.o°
I.OlOY Ifri A\'O!~ CYalUpp ~It»
November 23, 1999
18 MOfI?C11/ 1MSMIKfIOb
-s--If 11~1~
Club
Club Club Cb Q] [t] Club
I
Club Hotel ~ Club ~ Homl °^^ai+.s v
No10 Natel •'vp Ciub Hotel i1up o.'~
Hotel Hote~ Ciub Hotel
Acalnumnt Loading
. - . - . - . - . _ . _ . - . _ . _ . - . - . _ . _
Spe . Beilronm
Spa
9reekoul ~
North Elevation East Elevation
Cou rtyard Cou rtyard
_ Mb -
Club
••m Club
Club Cluh
Hotel Club Hotcl Q] ~ CIu6
Hotel CIu6
Hotel Hotet
. °-e~~vi'a°~'•$ , -~t.-~9#$i~
Homl Ho[el Hatei Hotel
Service Restnuram
West Elevation South Elevation
Cou rtyard Cou rtyard
~ ,
~ ~ o-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1~ 0 Naza'riote~ i? Buu0dong B Secctoons
AND nssocinrEs, iNC. Vail, Colorado s~le:r"=so--a~~
~u~ ~ ~ 1M°~°
P.O.W. Iflf A\d. November 23, 1999
OdOfA00 ~IltO ~
R Mql1lElSf FA[~~f~~.tOtl
, i~~ii I
0
Gateway Bu(Iding
Vail Plaza Hotel
Building A Vail Village Inn
Phase V
Village Road Elevation
e m ~ m
e m m~ m~ m
e m ° 0 8
a m o e?e
Vail Village Inn
Phese 111 Vail Plaza Hotel
Building B Gateway Building
North Frontage Road Elevation
L
~ ~ Naza Hotd Street Sectuons
Z E H R E ~~a
nND nssociArEs, INC Vail, Colorado soaie: I"=so'-o"
1.0.WZ q~ wWl~ mlafAm ~w
November 23, 1999
iaem"savr rAXmaw?im
Ah~
f
I
~ Club a
8
Hatei ? ? ' ~
' L°bbr - Vail Piaza Hotel Vail Village Inn
Building B Phase 111
' Vail Plaza Hotel
Building A
South Plaza Elevation
0
r
i
Vail Vfllage Inn Vail Plaza Hotel Vail Plaza Hotel
Phase V Bullding A 8uilding B
East Plaza Elevatioh
L Va*H ~ ~ e
~~1~L~1 ~i]Q~te~ ~~aza Sc~cc~uon§
ZEHREN Vail Colorado
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ Scale: 1"=50'-0"
Novem6er 23, 1999
~a emsncn~ FaomHS~m
~ _
~a ~ ` ~ ' ~.u,u, _
m e ~ m
\ ~ ('3rv.T1 I~ll) ~.Lli. ~
~~1f0.51a
f•llf,
- ~ ~ ~ \ 1'ne!7 ~
f \ ~ ~.illi•1
Aft
Building ~
p .~m
~ ~ ~ ' I•Hn•1 \ it
~ • ~ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ i ne,~n _ - _
AIR- - - -
\ 1•~
~.ifRl. \ Niu.51 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ .1•~]~.s)
•l 16f~1 ~ ;
- S _ \ _ ~ C \ F .l•iu1 ~ ~ -
-~•~svl 1-11 1 } t• \ . 1 t~ t n 1 ls ` ` i(.~A~.T~ ~ ~
A \ \ •I~lui ~ ~S) ~
\ " - \L - 5 I•~t..fy ~.to '
- \ !•l JI
- ' ~ '•,'t) - - ~ ~
" ~ ~ / •I~Inn fy ~
~.31n.111 ~
1•3uS. ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~(~i<~51
\ •1~ T~
i •(~IM) .I~~e~•
•1_1 ~ywv~.~
r
- ~ i4~5 O _l ~ _ 1•111'1 ~ _
f.~f1. O
:A •f•~fr.
' ~ 1''1•
~ p ~ O
7.E ~iI I~ E N V ~l~ ~ Naza HOW U B11.00Od0Wg Hc~~ght Nal I ANO AssocinTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado Absolute Heighu
"'°O"W"UIM • • lIff8110" Interpolated Contours
P.o.eX 1+7wrt ~caauoo um November 23,1999 Scale; 1 $0'-0"
~ _i•~.r~ ` °~~b~ ` ~ ~
~ ~
t-~an S • r ~ ~ s
A3h
FE3] m
' \ R \
~ ~~.1,]'1 1•3~1~
\ I+iH.ft
~ ~ \ \ 6 \ \ Hn \ \ ` ` -
Building
` ~.ie]'1• ~ ~ ~ ~ •1'I)_=.1t _ _ -
.I•~sl.f) ~ ~ I•~e11• _ _ _
- ~ /
\ ('1 1~ 1 ~ _
N~Yt \ _ ~ (•~~f ~ .~.iflni
I.TI •~~IF\ ~ G' ~ ~ _ ~ ~
-I.MbI \ \ •Iri~]i \ ` - ~ ~ _ .
.n~mo .t«wy
~ ~ \ •
, ~ S _ ~ ;f / .•1 !1
~ ~ ~ OI~J~ _ ? 9051 `q\i ,
1~ f
_ _ ~•~e • \ .~.~er - _ ui.e~ .~d.e
\ ws
1~ ~ . ~ .t• ..hie~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~.in.
. c i 1 .e~1 -
~ +ru •
~ - ~ ~N~ ~ - • ~
_ w ~ ~ _ pxn•~ ~ _
~ o
Z E H R E N VaoD Naza'---'UOtd i~Buflodong --ueoga~t Nan 2 qprD AssocU?O, iNC. Vail, Colorado Maximum Height Above Crade
"R4°'W' ~`°M . "'m November 23 1999 Interpolated Contours
ra~ox roa nww~ m~aiuoo n.m ~ SCdlG: 1°= 50,_On
mma~~ rw~emsw~oee' ,
- - IJ 17 Ul_1
Ffl 1 o,wm ir •-o. ' - • - - -
F~ F ?
D
Aarnnul Ped ? ?
Ue~wo S-J' ' lPotmti114~5
I i .
F7
' - ] o vnl ipu, i ' ?
Pool Section B-B
• : PmmnW BN^ ~ ? ~
D~ium I
Pertnniel Dcd
- ' ~ RPo~~nlill4p5
- _ Mlscmthu;Ml
~ ITemmyluNpsr,M~f
A Level WA
'v'n~~~ iss~_o..
- P~1 J Com n lunio1eur, a3
- _ Mi~can~h .pl -
OW
] Camm Jwi , as
on pu
Mi~cm~W:.pl ,
~tum ' • - . - . - ' - ' - ' - ' - ~ I i,.n -
•
Pool Section GC ;T„-~B a~.Ats eenlal Bed
` sro~mau.,i D
.
IPiokCwdim
Lilnc, d' Clumb,
If PorrnoislBetl
Dunun'1. - - . . Muumhw.
- I TunmY 1 ~rer, pIS
n~u~ ri+i ow
~ ~
m-i~7s
/
/
Pool Section C-C C /
- ~
Dcnun Ifi
I IIOA
lP~~~,~ •-~T • _ . . ~ . .
Pool Section E-E Pool Section A-A
~ E H R E N ' VaH Ma7a HotCC ~
AND AssocuMs, iNC. Vail, Colorado ~
A%CWMMIN . ~.MG . MOAM
I.O.q\ iffg AVM, ppqApp 2Il1p November 23, 1999
790101MW1ff lNO1IOSHtWn
i
i
i
i
i
i ~
~
t
1 I - - - - - -
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~
- - - - - i -1
- - - - - - \ - -
7,.,.,
I- - - - - _ ~,,,,r„ - - - - - - - -
1 I - -
I' `
~
,.1 . _
` - - - - - - - - - - - d ~ Lobby
.I
~ i i oaaio ~g
1
1 ~ ~ Service y
.,n 1 I
~
~ ",fi.,{ ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
~ ~~~~~I - "1 - ~ Reslaurant Lounge ~
~ .a ~ m n~ _ .
~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ Rcs~eurant
Lobby
~
O
I1~ ~ Reuil (jp P00~0~~po 1 [ ~
Three OPen d~Q (j a Qo 1
I H3 HI HS N6 ~ ~tt 0 C) C) 00~ n I
Vai I Road South Frontage Road
~ . *
Z E o-~ ~ ~ ~ va ~ ~ Naza Hote~ ',Wtu°eet Entov Studues
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Vail, Colorado Scale:l n_ 40'-0u
Am+TenuRt . runw~c . uaana -
rn.eoz nu ewµ caauoo etsm NOVembef 23, 1999
R N]O~Mf61S7 tAS11JqMLIE~O
, , .
.
, , . ~ ,
,
~
, . _.~.r~. ~
~
h=-..._
~
- 1 - r
„
- .s,--...
. ,
_
.
,
~ _
.
,
~
•
~
.
, ~ - - - _
-
- ~ - -
,
• - ~ - -
- .
.
.
,
_
,
. ~
igl
~ _
-
Y~.. E4'4. ~ ~ ~ S .
g.wyi ^ . . '~Z 9 . ~.d... ~
~ - ...,.rc~..
ION-
HKIM~
Grading Plan 35' Straightbody/50'Articulated 19'-6" Sport Utility Vehicle
.
. .
, . . .
, .
~ - ~ -
_ -
. ~ -
. . - -
- - - -
.
.
- - • - - - -
t~~
- ' ' . - ' -
~ - ~
, . . . .
,
I r~pk~ d ~ x: i
/ `
55' Semitrailer 45' Coach ~
11 711 611 IIb
~ Z EN~H RuXEQ N
~ AND„ASSOc FATES„"o Vail Plaza Hotel Loading and Delivery Plan
~~•E~~~~~ ":E~~~~"E"~~E Vail,Colorado
~ w""'6""""~~.'~•~ November23,1999
I~I
December 21 December 21 December 21 December 21
10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m.
Winter Solstice
~
~
March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23
10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m.
Spring/Fall Equinox
~
M ?
o
P
December 21 December 21 )une 21 June 21
12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon
Winter Solstice Surromer Solstice
a Vo
~ ~ a-fl ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~ Naza----'ote~ Su~tt Std.odv
nNO ASSOCIATES, iNC. Vail, Colorado Scale:t°=80'-0"
A.°"M'"U' "`m°" November 23
no.eox Im ewr~ mauoo nao , 1999
iae~as~sain r.~ceras~sim
r r ~
N
N C- i
O
fOUf $CD
~ ` ~ _ •<P Vall Pian
0
Hae
o w TwoStory
Holiday ~
House
o !
Street Sectian A
~
i~ 4 I
Average Setback '
Three and Four Story Areas E
C B A Three Seory r r` r Holbday House
6 ~
c~
o ~
Street Section B
z I
¢ ~s~• ~
z
w
x I
W a
N
~ Four Story Three Sbory I
Haliday I
Fiovse Yail P!a¢¦
CT~ j f HoteI ~
N ~
Average Setback i I
C;n Three and Four Stery Areas Street Section C
N ~ r/aDQ Ma71a Hot(~ SetlbacOc Stu~9 ~
Z Ca-OR E t~ ~ ~l
C7 AND JS30CU18, INC. Vail, ColOradO Scale: i' = 40'4r I
Novert*ef y3, 1949
~ob IE~ MAM1 ~4~00 ~Ir , I
iawr~ nswri~
\
11
~y _
TOWN OF YAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479=2138
FAX 970-479-2452 O Q ~
MEMORANDUM ~
~
To: Town of Vail Design Review Board
From: Community Development Department
Date: December 1, 1999
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel -Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council
In anticipation of appearing before the Vail Town Council for first reading of an amending ordinance to allow for
the redevelopment of Phase N of the Vail Village Inn Special Development District, the applicant has requested a
preliminary recommendation from the Design Review Board.
Pursuant to the Town Code, in part, "no person shall building construction or demolition within the corporate limits
of the Town unless design approval has been granted in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code."
Should the Design Review Board choose to make a preliminary recommendation of approval to the Vail Town
Council on the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, staff would suggest that the following finding and-
conditions be made part of the recommendation:
"Upon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the Board
finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structures, the hotel's surroundings and with Vail's
environment. The Board further finds that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of tlie
Design Guidelines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plan & Urban
Design Considerations. Therefore, the Board recommends approval of the redevelopmenT proposal for the Vail
Plaza Hotel. The Board's recommendation of approval carries with it the following conditions: ,
l. That the applicant submits a final landscape plan, final off-site improvements plan, and outdoor ligllting plan in accordance with the provisions prescribed in the Zoning Regulations for review and approval of the
Design Review Board.
2. That the applicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and
approval of the Design Review Board.
3. That the applicant submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
4. That the applicant submits a roof-top mechanical plan prior to the issuance of a building perrnit. All roof-
top mechanical equipment shall be enclosed and screened from public view.
RECYCLEDPAPER
:
~
.
DEC-O1-99 02:36PM FROM-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.07/14 F-582
JOINT R.ESOLUTION ADOPTEp 8Y THE
BOARD OF AIRECTORS ANA MENiBERS
OF THE POTA1'O p.4TCH CLYJB CONDONxiNIiA1Z ASSOCIATION, YNC.
VI~IHEREAS, the Poiato Patch Club Condominium Associatio,q, Inc, (herei~er
refeired ta as the "Associarian") is currenily a party to certain liugauon initiated by John A.
Carnie aud Joan T. Camic (the "Camies"} requesting the condeaznauon af a certain easement
over propeny owned by the Associatian in order to obtain access to a landlocked parcel of land
located adjaceut to Association property and currently Qwned by ihe Carnies (ihe "Carnie
Propert}'')-
WHEREAS, the Association has been advised that the Carnies may desire to sell
theii' property to MJL Develapment Inc. and/or Michael J. Lauterbach sud/or deir assigqs or
affiliazcs (hereineer collectively referred to $s the "Poteniial Purchaser'i.
WHEREAS, iniual disCUSSions have taken place between suthQrized
representttiives of the Association and the Potential Purchaser conceming the purchase of the
Camie Properry and the possible grant of an access easement ovcr Assoriation property by the
Association w Potential Ptmhaser.
WUEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Association have reached agenerai
understanding with Potential Ptxrchaser regarding the process by which Poieutia2 Purchaser could
obtain au $ccess easement &orn the Association at an agreed upon lacation if Potential Purch$ser
actually obtains title to the Carnie Propetry.
WIWJZEAS, if Poteniia,l Purchaser obtains $pproval of the Town of Vail (and ail
ather governmental endties with jurisdiction over the subject properiy) for Potential Purchaser's
development plans and specifications (the "Plans and Specificadons') with respect to the Carnie
Property, the prospecis of a traasfer of title to the Camie property to the Potentiai Purchascr are
greatlY increased.
WH&REAS, in order to obtaiu approvei of the Plans and Specifxcations for ihe
deveIopmeni of The Catnie Property, PoYential Purchaser ]as advised the Associatiou that
Potential Purchaser requires a letter of iutent finm the Associ$tion agreei.ng to grani to PotentW
Purchaser an easement for inWess and egress over Associatian properry to the Carnie Property at
the locarion specifxed in the plans and Specifications.
WHHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser is able to acquire the Camie Property and
obtain from the Associatiaxt the easement for ingtess and egress rnore panicu,lar3y described
hereim, the liugation filed by the Camies with respect thereto could be disuiissed and the
Association cauld be released from the obligation to defead such artion.
WHM~EAS, on June 4, 1999 the Board of Directors of the Associ$tion adopted $
resolution (by a vote of six to two) recommending thai the $oazd of Directois bring io the
owners and members of the Association at the siuusai meeting, a nesoliuion authori2iug the
Association to pttrsue the maiters more particularly described herein.
?17441 RGALT 17nA9xRrD1
DE£-01-99 02:36PM FROIA-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.08/14 F-582
NOW THERUORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FQLLOWS, in accordance with
SecQpn 1$.3.4 of the Candomuuum Dec3aration far Potato Patch Condorniniuns:
I_ T'hr Board of Directors of the Assaciation is hereby auThorized ro grant an
easemenT for ingres3 and sgr+cess to Potential PuiChaser upon satisf4tioa of all of the teims and
conditians therefar set fasth in this Resolution.
2. The g~sut of the subjcct e:asement for ingress and egress {rhe "Easement'l
sha11 be subject to the saxisfacdon of each and every one of the fotiowing conditions by Potential
Purchasez: - (a) Acquisition. of it,e Carnie Property by Potentiai Purcbager;
(b) Final plat approvai by the Town of Vail of the Plans ;nd
Specific$tious for developrnent of the C amie Property (the "pevelopment");
(c) The Development shall coAtain no more than fxvc (5) singie faraily
residcums and shall noi exceed i,500 square feet GIZFA, developetl and built in
accardanGe with the site plau attaehed hereto; (d) A 30 foot setback fxvm the Association's east property ]ine shall be
established in the Plans and Specifications and xnainxained by Potentisl Purchaser;
(e) The Easenent ahalt nai be rnore than 25 fea in width, snd the
tuming radius of the Easement within, the AssaciaAaa pzopeity must be approved by the
Town of Vail Fire Aepartrnent and the Association Boazd of Uirecton;
(t) The written evidertce of the Easement must provide $11 Costs of
surveying, cnntpiying with Towri of Vail plazuaing requirements, aIl consuuction
(ineludiag roed consiructiom), ]andscaping and xounaing of the eutrance, as wel! as the
resta=auan of any Associatipnn, propercy wtich is altered oz da,maged duting coastxuetion,
shali be bome solely by Potsutial Purchaser;
(9) Pot=tial PurchasPx shail, upon acecution af the forma1
docutncntatian of the Eesement~ pay to the Association the stM of $250,000, whic.h sW1
be aUacaied by thf; Associarirnt a.s condemnation award damnges as specified in
SeciioA 33.4 of the Candaminitun Declaration for Potato Pateh Club Coadomuiiums;
(h) The written documentasion of the FAsement shaII contain, ax
couuide wiih othet documentation exrcuted by the Assaciatidn and Poteutia]. Puzchaser,
a full settle.nent of the Caraie litigation w1th prejudice;
(i) The Easement shau not be gramed unw such time as Potenual
Pnrchaser has obtaiaed fee titie to the Camie ProPertY;
(i} t7pan issuauee of aud in corijuncdon vr?lth the executian of a Zetter
Qf intent to grsnt the- Fasemern to Potemial Purchaser by the A.ssociation, the Carnies
mvst agree and stipulate ca a reasonabte comtinuanse and vacation of ihe Uial dale and
a174V6 1 =wTS 0&MftZI7PM 2
DEE-01-99 02:36PM FROV-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.09/14 F-582
abatement af all legat proceediAgs in the ctuzent coademnation litigatian, pending
completion of the TowA af Vail planning ptncess with resptct to the PIam and
Specificauons af Potential Ptrchaser for Thc Lk-velopment.
FURTfIER RE SOLVED, thax the ,Board of Directois of the Associatio» is hereby
authorizxd to issue a non-binding letter of inieni w the Poteniial Purcbaser specifying the
parameroers and limitations with respect to the Ea.semsnt seL fonh above and any othesc limitatioas
andJrnc conditions reyuired by the Board of Directors ar counsel tor the Assaciation for the
ga5sible grant of the Easement uo Fotential Purehaser. Such letter of inteat must contain aa
a,cknowledgment by the Potentiai puxchaszr ibat zhe issuance of the !ever af intent and the
execution of the Easement shaU iu no way bc coasmued tp bs an approval by the Association (or
auy of its mcrabm) of the Devclopment orthe Ptans and Specifications, and that ati rnernbers of
the Associatian and tlic Associatian itself reserve ali righxs to parcicipale in any Town of VaiL
plannia~ process rclating to the develapment a(' the Camie Prcpert.y_ Potemia] Pwxchaser must
funher acknowledoe tbat eertain mearbers of the Assoeiatioa may be appased to the grant of the
Ea,,errtant and may actively parpcipate in such Town of Vai1 plauniug pmccss.
FURTHFR RF,$QLVED, rbat within =he iimitaUons arai parame= set foxth
above, rhe Board of Dim-ctox's of the Associatian shall be and is hereby authorized, empovvemd
and direeted to nebotiaie, executz and, as necessary, record the abflve-describcd lemr of intent
and the fma1 definitive written Fasement in conjuncti4n with couasel for the Associatian, and to
ncgotiau a fusal sefflement of the CazAey litigation, KIlth prej udir,e, as of the result of the grant af .
the Easemcnt.
FU-2.THF,R RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors is and shaU 6e authorizcd,
cmpowercd aad duected ta explore the possibility aC ereating a sub-asavciation with respect to
the fuW spproved development of the Caruic Propmy fQr rhe gurpases of_
(a) sharug, the cost of maimenance, mpairs and sAaw retnoval far the
Eascment;
(b) $ceess tp and appmpriate cost sharing in Ehe m«intertance, mpair
and capital improvecnanis to the eommnn elements ol' the Association, includixtg the
unnis courts, ppol, spa and healih cluh; and
(c) to amend the Condomi.rzium. Utc[acation fdr Potato Pa.tch Club
Condoraiaiums to include the above-descriE,ed p:nvfsians, subjecx to the approval of The
• owners and morcgagees of units with;.a the Association as rcquusd by such Mal=tion,
with such aiheY tcrnns and conditians contained thercin as may be required by the Board
of Dircctors and r„auusc-I for the Associatian as appropriate_ ~{74Y0.! RCwiT us3-zP =19ym 3
DEE-01-99 02:37PM FRON-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.10/14 F-582
"rhe undersigned, as President of ihe Association, herehy cerrifies rha the
Resalutions conrained herein were duly adopted and approved by the Board af Direcr,ors and the
members of the Association at the aanusl meeting of the Association conducted on July 2, 1999
aud the subsequent Board of Directors meeting bcld im.mediat.ely therea,ftor.
2~~ CN/ QVJII~-
TJ. Gargarl, .D., si of the
Associatiari
Appmved and accepted this ~ day of s~3 3
zchael J_ Lauterbach
417499 1 194nI I awuM s:s, ne 4
DEE-01-99 02:37PM fROM-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.11/14 F-582
Dur4m, ABPLANAL? omicm
& MAl1R1ELLO, P.C.
.
MmEqoa"
40"n IL sym Warspw smK lWf4Anra
.
aow 9ours P T~wour
~ a.~e I.n,~+~ a~0 . ~ aa~o w~ cnai 47veLsoa
comm WAaoM WML Sw« aoo +%m.a,c
a py~ Cd.oN~ si~7 ~707 A78-4~SS
.aCn~1'IVa.MWS" x'.~.~*~~~.~gWw~ ~
1999 T.iAiw ft Outm, CLai,
.~aNiQ ~ ~4~Q34'~k
3fti Rmowu ran=
lb. DOosidc Uaudcft
x--Um~ ~J+ D~e~t
zlt sawhFmnrwRcad wac
%dco $l+fi59
'UK Cnkiatuftch IfiOjrxt • Pomm Pmk cm* .
~ ~ a~tt Dav~ . .
a~ad Mt~yansmaww% aWFkt4Im b=sngqged ti•~-~me I~
~~pt~ r•heavAas a~~es II =d 26, pO4n,c, pafth qni~, -
~ ia avsoa~a~ l~Ii • by t~e Td~a~a a~E vaft of ~ p~p~
• deve~op~eqr aF t~e ~d lQac= ta asd eraa af their sopwde& Tbas hmd is au
=Pbaed P'ncd+aWVAd by W. aad 16s. Cm=r- 7U dcvdgpa Is
~ Laac~:b~1. ~e Bo~d ~ap~e i~r 1~~ ~'~g~p P'~ Ctexic'0
L...
1'lsis ktter is 3amended Ia folkarup M rna =Wgw 0i *0 =ammjalMbmg=dta
*e TaM by W lAUmdw* 9ad oa ar~r ~ a~ d~a L'~# n~'pug~
We bm~ed a~ ~~s o~ e~3n~e ca t~
fiaVM aad 3c seeats" Oputan d=th=cbe darMMarcu=ecmmd, -ghcpw*bb=an=
~ tve fonotiv.i~qg-
3. Tm Z'om bad baat pmviW wft a =ohm= adopW 1y *e 8owd af
t3o ~~3 t~ ~7, ~ppa~y'imomdedto~y
fur a 340r af MMat =dew wbi& m a=W2
caad be oi~das+3. W!s!+ naram~ ~ ~ ~'ces~) .
~ ~R ffi~ ~ by 1he P'~ sa
~ ~ ~
IMP
~ af Ss~ I8~3 oi ~d;c~c g~ p~
P~me~CnbL ltjs tbe8*md'spae~tha the
~ ~ dfnvo-thirds {~9~ ~~hs vw~ iaP~+Ca~ ~roY~d~
~
• .
DEC-01-99 02:37PM FROVI-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.12/14 F-582
. a?~ dw aemed Sm jmietambLed =mg%ft) frA
ardw cbat da 8arm+d mw b+o waochad ia ~ y,o awan=L
sme maub.rs aFfft J1a~oaa~~s 44qpmsvmaumpo~ aod
botod we co~nvin~ed tba ft =noun= aw be g=md c*
oroc;gh = mueodmr~ ~*11 de+eosauta'm Md by o~
_ tbO msm= by 29 oMMM ca& of VhM UU 84 mddded
I=wm iu OU PmpeM., ku My ewI i, a *t #lm,e of the kst
rI* otr to *e gPC Rmrd of Dfte=M =ly n of *e 29 owner
=msm*wf=edl?abavebOebe=abWvx4 =dno I~~
cam-am"d- oa thc prapoaL "hcn*m *9 sumbnlm can=
be pm*A
b. Ua seaot4ti+aet IM Wt iaUndAd aad. did as seM rit a 1acee of
~ ~~~~M PCOVM* m PW 3j dla raoluam
a~o~d *e 8aard of ="oon tio 3a" ik iooe offtm up=
&e sagafiadw of *e oxmwm sa ftw* JIL *s zemotaun Invu
(gaa'esD9 ca Me 2) mt sttch a&ar waftow n mW ba
hmpa@Wb9sbe8md+~~ Abowotftmthmnotbam-
'sst~+ed, ~ t'~ ~ ~ ~t~, ~Bed. be~t~ss ibe
- Soahd ba~ not ' ~tat'~rr ~qe~ ~l be~
siadha~s~e~~ aaaeb~alcnrnm aad Umdm irivtmt
Ukdkowd dica approvd of*e Propawd Er= afamess.
c. To rise eftm *a iWe:e bw bm aW dlsewdm rvl
bme in *e owm= ar *e do4elnW md the aand of ubusm
of PM *M hu =ft dqth wft *e pmoDge mm of a 25*m
WUkcmmmmk Z'beTam3=brdhcmdtbWidd~&50-&mvdde
awa 404Oatwida =mwe=xMbe *asthe amm =at
is nabe counmedin*e assomaw. ~ndshvt~~~oe~t+~ E3~
e~~ be mal;&d #n Provo* i9~b+K d~eP pawns nmm.
Tw Aond bsu ~ elnh imt am dbcmsed mw of dwe
P~ ~m ab~ Rwh of dose ~eq~
IN I IN dat* , s Vdxo tpa vdkSC is nor a y-fva~ dI"Way
_ an~atd ~ CaVecdviYr if .
ad tbe Sgudwm ddV O! tim V=Bk o~tac euEtpomed ia ordw zc
Pmdfttbe s~e roqub"hwthe mam~.~. Na~qe o~ ~~se
hmMM hmLomcmddcrcd bytbePpCH~d o!Dboumm md .
" ,be nokuga cnma Le coaddeoM evldmxe of ftm u tv my
. ~
•~„r .
DEC-01-99 01:38PM FRON-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.13/14 F-582
d. saeuAA " of *e -Iftakdm pm"W"_tv *6 Tam af Vw
Pe~avld-x dm my pM29ft ai fficUmomb9On Ann odaR=
_ 3scnad~OOedupm1leapprovdbyft asr+odadoaaftbm~
tmfts prapwea. *e miftc sm 9 m whI& b d~ ~ ~te
plamtbrmam*e tmai~ Istsapt mumosabopl's asd
fx Is vafty *at ic woWd be appmvd bq *e A~sodatio~.
C- rg~vffly s+a¢h a~ c.t~mut be psmuol*d.
, 2. ne plstu .
M. Tle mvs pmv3ded,m deTavva9t=msimtwe is ndiaoa=oS
~btolw~'~n~chea~~mestiabeAO-f~~ ~b~+e~snos~b
`ag visbc-Opww.? Iatim tbm tx aosiWt-a4Wq at 23i. Aa
*eportlftaf*elKamdwWm=w~aeAc~mpamkstbia
l0M ftft=96ibe1md abi&is m be dkmd by oiqsem=
~y ~1 CO~~ ow~Rr. lbe NC Jla~vdati~oa ~ ~p pmrt .
ol*2 bndwhfCb3s p~+e~oe~d wbe as, Find by*e =mtemt xn *e opWem ofa ntsmbercfavrnmars, *e AwodWtlam cpn Xm=n*-
rwe fia Ind leh it do= owri. In asy GVCC4 *0 ma~
~d sotbeTawa mim amwfhid@udbftaa*WwdxwzW*
aemW mUkb don not exUt.
b. T~re n~s pR+~ ~a tbe Tvw~ aa~ea
edC baweiaPPC Uzfta 1 lwd2%mdaaaoa at a3t esfwawdww
cCitbe ~ Oftwoposed newiawL Ia fWcr.*ia wa hu
at Ieatsbt==aae pine mves
„ altolabM bsoe beap»oecwd by
ft PPC ownrs =d rvoald ba eftmls~ ac, d ol *e lmd
' dri P 1, mw, kMad. if Y sond 9vm pem3md ftov* tbe PVC -
p+aMty ai tds paim We w7E law pim~s of these t~
a- al" bo you sboitly adr tlo leme~ b um=i-md w ym 9
tbW do an aceampmwiL
' e. 84eet C.-1 afte Alm submitmd as fte 4t3t of Aqpst weemt ta
klmmW am*xIm ia wha isl iu bm aa hoobdft pmbkaai. 1he
p, vpuw 3a qmesdoa fs aa ad*= m fte saI ke. AbbouA an
aacoqrt bas bms mwd+e m dutm a Sm t:ack~ am u tbe
~ +aEtbe a~r soa~ ~p~redsabsIan 3s dm1le
'!'bap~apo~d d~a~ ~ ~a~eaask~ ~ sbi~~s aas
a~aLae~a~~+e c~ ~ a~ a~t~bepa~ed ~af~Ot aF
dw SaMp of Uart No. 46 arakm im iavvIAM tm ibe pam;ggs of
3
~
.DEC-01-99 02:38PM FR0M-OJRNR 3038256525 T-131 P.14/14 F-582
• vdter mw'BuztiYvabwjM mdaaomud ivom for umwiu ac&jb
~eat3a~. uww Swdt dhumsrmm, a 5=e emagenry Moaod
~aosotayth~s~es3d~a~sa~tt3~a ~
ba~ oits cszsd~ ~s w~e~. d~ mt
. appm to be =e Arbi& iX p"= Ca rCW*SfiM
3. The owaarft Isom
a. ne TMs W aLwctrpr~~ idend&d nmw af *a i~ aad
. z~0 mmam=r~aarid to the P"deex. I1aANeM
. ~ t~ose ae
above wb"vertamwt
tD *e Camfe pope:qr, but 'po rbe PpC popa*, A=mdbiffiya ic
slodd be mqpfted *a *t PgC p~is pm md pa~3 af
dee pmgaoL md the .pmpo=, as aTag& siwd,d aoe mwe
£eam vubm *e appffara aE eh,e owwoof *a nt e~t~e
-dffccud i.e. tht awn= agt~ romeno commmejgmmu af*a
~
b- In 90qdft *t Waeas af t~ ~of ft Mr, tt mbodd b+t
bb= insftd ~dm zbeOWW oftbe $=aii is
aa~ ~~PC but t~e a~r af e~h oo~a~ ~1t.
7hmoma~ataderem=~rdaw0dtode •
_ bw tiio~e 3d=a8,~d abooe sbo~d be ~d~l ~es !or tbe Tawn at ~
3WP Of *8 P'rDcmbogs- 12 vy m W mftble m Aimm wi* yrou a4p bam af the
~oexba~hpsopmalT*khym~w lmdwdhftadau incin b„c
noc I#R*sd mo dwe Raed ab"&
Tb=ic yOt for yoW =adned asds'wm la tus MoptW.
v~
~
actbw 1!. Abp~i
x~ Aam,t ~'av+esno~t ind bim c,evW ~d
4
. MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: December 7, 1999
SUBJECT: An appeal of the Design Review Board's approval of a proposed 5 dwelling unit
development plan, located to the east of the Potato Patch Club and north of Sun
Vail on an unplatted parcel..
'Appellants: Dome Investment Group and George and Elizabeth Ireland,
represented by Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr..
Planner: Dominic Mauriello .
- I. SUBJECT PROPERTY
The "Carnie Property,~ ~a npld ropose ld development is tited `tPotato Patch Cr ek.orth of
Sun Vail (see attache p) The P
II. STANDING OF APPELLANT The Appellants are individual owners of Unit 11 (Dome Investment Group) and Unit 15 (Ireland)
in the Potato Patch Club. The Potato Fatch Club is located adjacent to the proposed
development just to the west. This appeal was filed by individual unit owners and is not on
behalf of the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association. The Association is in general
approval of the approved plan.
III. BACKGROUND
List of attachments:
- Exhibit #1- Appellant's appeal form
- Exhibit #2 - Reductions of approved plans
- Exhibit #3 - Notice to adjacent property owners and location map
- Exhibit #4 - Potato Patch Club Resolution
The Development Proposal
The following is a summary of the background on this proposal and appeal. The applicant, Jack
Carnie, represented by Michael Lauterbach (Mr. Lauterbach has the property under contract to
purchase), filed an application for a Minor Subdivision with the Community Development
Department on July 12, 1999. After reviewing the items submitted, the Community Development
Department (hereafter "staff") informed the applicant that he had filed the wrong application for
the development approval intended. Since the property is zone RC, the applicant will be
developing the project as a Town House plat. This requires an approval of a development plan
1
before the pfatting process can take place. The applicant then submitted a Design Review _
Application on August 24, 1999. ,
The application submitted was for the development of 5 single family homes on a 59,500 sq. ft.
parcel of land (Potato Patch Creek) zoned Residential Cluster (RC). Residential Cluster zoning
allows the development of single-family, two-family and multiple-family dwelling units. The
allowable number of dwelling units on the property is 7.5 dwelling units based on a density of 6
dwelling units per acre. '
The project is accessed, through the Potato Patch.Club along an existing driveway. It was
identified that this driveway, due to the increase in use by'the Potato Patch Creek proposal,
would have to be upgraded (widened in certain areas) to allow access to the proposed project.
The applicant's submittal included a resolution from the Board of Directors of the Potato Patch
Condominium Association (see exhibit) indicating their intent to approve this access and related
improvements.
" A notice was mailed to adjacent property owners on July 29, 1999 (see exhibit). This was a Board courtesy notice and is not required b aiae I On Oc~to~berO6t be 20the
19991t~he Des'gn Review
reviewed the proposal as a concep
Board approved the development proposal subject to four conditions:
1. Prior to the recording of any pla ao access rthrough the Potato Pat h Cluybthe
owner/applicant shall secure eg
property via an access easement or'similar instrument.
2. Prior to the recording of any plat or construction on the Carnie property,., the
owner/applicant shall obtain written approval from the Potato Patch Club .
Homeowner's Association for completing driveway/access improvements
(i.e., paving and grading) on the Potato Patch C4ub praperty.
3. Final civil engineering plans must be approved by the Town Engineer for the
access road prior to application for a building permit.
4. The approval is specific to the Carnie property and does not extend to
property outside the subject parcel.
On November 10, 1999, the Community Development Department received a Design Review
Application from the Potato Patch C1ub Condominium Association, 1nc. to construct the access
improvements discussed above. No approval has been issued for the access improvements as
additional information is needed to approve the application.
IV. NATURE OF THE APPEAL
The specific language of the appeal is attached and should be relied upon as the statement of
the appeal. The following is a summary of issues prepared by Town staff:
1. The approval of the development plan constitutes a public safety hazard -
endangering the properry of the Appellants.
. 2, The approval allows development without adequate review and consideration of
the impacts on the Appellants and the Potato Patch Club in generaf.
2
is
3. The approval pand aen of the Appetlanots oh the Potato Patch Club.
without the consen pproval
4. The plans upon which the Design Review Board used to make its approval are
inaccurate and incomplete.
V. TOWN RESPONSE TO THE APPEAL
The Community Development Department has prepared the following analysis in an attempt to
answer the appeal.
The applicant provided complete and adequate plans for reviewing the proposal. While the
application did not include an absolute approval from the Potato Patch Club it did include a
resolution stating the Association's intent to provide an easement across the Potato Patch Club
property. Since this resolution did not actually grant an easement, the DRB placed two very
specific conditions requiring that an easement be obtained from the Association and that any
improvements to the-Association's land be approved by the Association. Therefore, if no
approval is given and no easement is obtained, the approval becomes void.
Since the date of the Potato Patch Creek development plan approval, the Town has received an
application to complete the required improvements to the access on the Association's property
(paving to widen driveway). This application is signed by the President of the Potato Patch Club
Condominium Association. This application is currently being analyzed by the Town staff to
insure that it meets all of the applicable development regulations.
Therefore, the issue of whether the applicant has the right to access the property appears to be
adequately protected.
All of the improvements required on the Potato Patcii Club property are the result of the Town's
analysis to insure that the access meets the minimum requirements for vehicular access as
provided in the Town's regulations. These improvements will insure the safe access of all
parties involved.
The plans provided also adequately address the access to utilities for the proposed development.
VI. REQUIRED ACTION
Uphold/Overturn/Modify the Design Review Board's approval with conditions of the proposed
development plan for Potato Patch Creek.
The Town Council is required to make findings of fact in accordance with the Town of Vail
Municipal Code: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the
particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the
standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (Zoning Regulations, Title 12)
have or have noi been met.
VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION .
3
Staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the Design Review Board's approval with
conditions of the proposed development plan for Potato Patch Creek subject to the following
findings:
1. That the standards and condiein memposed by the requirements of Title 12
(Zoning Regulations) have be
2. That the conditions imposed on the approval are anum Associat otn.e interest
of the Appellants and the Potato Patch Club Condom ,
4
, ~XVIlYJI{~ ~ l
*VA
~aWvAPPEALS FORM
REQUIRED FOR FILING AN APPEAL OF A STAFF, DESIGN REVIEW BOAR.D OR
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION
A. ACTION/DECISION BEING APPEALED: Approval of a proj ect known as the
Lauterbach/Carnie Pro'ect, also known as the Carnie/Lauterbach Project
and as Potato Patch Club, by the Town of Vail Design Review Board
on the 20th of October, 1999.
B. DATEOFACTION/DECISION: 20 netnher 1999
C. NAME OF BOARD OR PERSON RENDERING THE DECISION/TAKING ACTION:
Town of Vail Design Review Board
D. NAME OF APPELLANT(S): Dome Investment Group George & Elisabeth Ireland
c/o Pau1 Hoff Suite 3650
3800 East Long Road 1700.Lincoln Street
MAILING ADDRESS: T~i ttl Ptnn CO 801 1-1 91 4 Dpn~TPr O 80203
Unit 11 Unit 15
Potato Patch Club Condos Potato Patch C1ub Condos
PHYSICAL ADDRESS IN VAIL: 950 Red Sandstone Rd, Vail M@NB950RedSandstoneRdVai
Telephone: (303)689-9800 (303)830-2171 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF APPELLANT'S PROPERTY IN VAIL: TTn i t 1 5 pnta+-n pa t,•h r-l u1-,
. Unit 11, Potato Patch Condominiums
xa',4~ a..~.c4
E. SIGNATURE(S). :t
Fage 1 of 2
t , F', nr
lll~
SU8& 3'lu;iiali:` Ri1A
' Vali; 00 t4~.i.i!
F. Does this appeal invo(ve a specific parcel of land? Ye s If yes, please provide the following information:
are you an adjacent properiy owner? Yes X no .
If no, give a detailed explanaaon of how you are an "aggrieved or adversely affected person." "Aggrieved or
adversely affected person" means any person who will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or
furthered by this tide. The alleged adverse intezest may be shared in common with other members of the
community at lazge, but shall exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons.
Appellants are the owners of specific condominiums and the owners
. of unaivided.interests in the general common elements of the -
Potato Patch Club, which adjoins the property which was the subject
of the action from which this appeal is being taken. The approval
of the project, 4nd its possible development, constitute a public
safety hazard endangering the property of the Appellants and would
" permit the development of the subject property without adequate'
review and consideration of the impacts on the property of the
Appellants and the Potato Patch Club in general. The approval
would also permit the development based upon access through the
Potato Patch Club for which no standards have been established
artlregardirig which there has been neither consent by the appellants oi
the other owners of Potato Patch Club nor any analysis or review
of the impact.of chanres to the Potato Patch Club in association
with that access. Further, the plans upon which the Design Review
Boarcl relied, in association with conditioningapproval upon access
through..the, Potato Patch Club are inaccurate, incomplete and
unable to accurately understand the impact of the proposed project
or the condition imposed upon the property of the Appellants and
the Potato Patch Club as a whole.
G. Provide the names and addresses (both person's mailing address and property's physical address in Vail) of all
owners of property which are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including properties .
separated by a xight-of-way, stream, or other intervening barriers). Also provide addr`essed and stamped envelopes for
each property owner on the list.
H. On separate sheets of paper, specify the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code sections having
relevance to the action being appealed
I. FEE: $0.00
Page 2 of 2 - . . , . . . - . . . .
~ ,
LAW OFFICES
- DUNN, ABPLANALP & MAURIELLO, P.C.
A PqOfESS10NAL CORPORATtON
JOHN W. DUNN WESTSTAR BANK BUILDING TELEPHONE:
ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP,-JR. 108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST (970)476-0300
DIANE HERMAN MAURIELLO FACSIMICE:
CARRIE HENDON O'NEIL SUITE 300
(970) 476-4765.
, VAIL, COLOR~ADO 61657
OF COUNSEL: e-mail: vaillaw@vail.net
JERRY W. HANNAH ' CERTIFIED LEGALASSISTANTS
KAREN M. DUNN, CLAS
. JANICE K. SCOFIELD, CLA
27 October 1999
Town Council
Town of Vail , Vail, Colorado
Re: Appeal of Town of Vail Design Review - Carnie/Lauterbach Proposal
This Firm represents Dome Investment Group (the owners of Condominium Unit
11, Potato Patch Club) and George and Elisabeth Ireland (the owners of Unit 16,
Potato Patch Club). Each of our clients is also the owner of an undivided interest in
the common elements of the Potato Patch Club. Our clients are, therefore, owners of
properry adjoining that which is the subject of this letter.
We have previously provided the Town with our letter of the 20th of October,
1999, advising the Town of our client's appeal of the decision of the Vail Design .
Review Soard of that date related to the project sometimes known as Potato Patch
Creek, and which is proposed by John A. Carnie and Joan T. Carnie, as owners, and
Michael Lauterbach, as applicant. A copy of the application and the record of the
decision of the Design Review Board accompany this letter.
The purpose of this letter, together with the copy of the letter which is attached
and which was provided to the Design Review Board, is to supply the information
requested through the Town's "Appeals Form" to which this letter is attached.
This appeal is being filed on the basis of the following issues:
1. The project involving the parcel owned by Mr. and Mrs. Carnie, requiring
and including access across the general common elements of the Potato
Patch Club, was presented to the Town as a single proposal, though
which the staff appropriately and necessarily recommended requirements
to be imposed regarding access. The access offered by the applicant
crosses and affects the general common elements of the Potato Patch
Club, which are owned by the owners of the Potato Patch Club.
1
2. The applicant was required to submit plans for the project which-
accurately depict the proposal. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-
4.C.l.a. and d. The submittals by the applicant were erroneous and
misleading. Among the errors in tlus material were (a) the
representation that there exists a forty-foot easement by which access to
the project property was in place (which is false), (b) the failure to
identify trees and 1`andscaping which would be damaged, eliminated or
affected by the proposed road project (particularly between the proposed
access road and the Potato Patch Club tennis courts), and (c) the
misrepresentation that there existed only one post office delivery
structure to be relocated, when there are, in fact, four such structures.
3. In processing the application for the Lauterbach/Carnie proposal, the ,
Town staff was required to analyze and determine that access was
suitable. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-5.G. The staff appropriately
identified a requirement for access. The staff determined that the access
which was to be part of the project was to occur across the general
common elements of the Potato Patch Club. However, no analysis
occurred with reference to the impact of that access on the Potato Patch
Club or its, owners, which is one of the design review criteria. Vail
Municipal Code, Section 12-11-1.D.5. .
4. The Town Staff then identified changes which must be made to the
Potato Patch Club general common elements, and the applicant
responded with plans for changes to those general common elements
which again were developed without the agreement or participation of
the owners of the general common elements, in violation of Vail
Municipal Code, Section 12=1,1-4.C. In fact, the owners of the Potato
Patch Club general common elements did not, at any time before or
during processing, join in the application or participate in the process,
with the exceprion of the involvement of our clients. The joinder of the
owners of the Potato Patch Club general common elements in the
application was a necessary prerequisite to the consideration of any
aspect of this application. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-4.C.1.
5. Although the applicant.provided the Town with a resolution of the Board -
of Directors of the Potato Patch Condominium Association with that
representation that the resolution was a letter of intent to grant an
easement, a review of that document establishes that it was no more
than a tentative commitment to negotiate regarding that issue.
2 .
, 6. The Town is required to confirm compliance with the zoning code and
subdivision regulations with reference to the project, which included the
general common elements of the Potato Patch Club. Vail Municipal Code,
Secrion 12-11-4.C.2. With reference to the gerieral common elements of
the Potato Patch Club which is part of the proposed project, that did not
occur.
7. In processing the application for the Lauterbach/Carnie proposal, the
Town staff was required to analyze and determine that utilities would be
suitable. Vail Municipal Code, Section 12-11-5.F. Neither the plans
submitted by the applicant nor the Design Review Board dealt with utility
access at all. The only reference to a utility easement on the plans
submitted to the Town affirmarively states that the only access easement
illustrated on any plat is undocumented.
8. The Design Review Board imposed conditions on approval of the
projected which require changes in the general common elements of the
Potato Patch Club. However, those conditions failed to recognize the
necessity that such changes comply with Town land use regularions, and
no analysis was accomplished in order ` to determine whether the
required changes to the Potato Patch Club general common elements
would adversely affect the Potato Patch Club or its owners, on either a .
practical or regulatory basis, in violation of the Vail Municipal Code,
Sections 12-11-1.D.5 and 12-11-4.C.2. For example, the increase in
paving could affect the 60% requirement for landscaping,, and the
widening of the existing driveway will eliminate existing parking within
the Potato Patch club and may either cause the Club to become non-
conforming or increase its non-conformity. If there is an assumption that
utility lines are to pass through the Potato Patch Club, that is an impact
which has been neither identified nor analyzed.
9. The Design Review Board imposed a condition that access be
demonstrated prior to recordation of a plat of the Lauterback/Carnie
parcel prior to recordation of any plat. Although requiring access as a
condition of approval of the Lauterbach/Carnie proposal, the Design
Review Board did not establish any criteria for the access. It could be a
. five-foot wide foot path, or it could be a ten-foot wide jeep trail. The
absence of consideration of the type of access required and the impact
that part of the project on the owners of the Potato Patch Club effectively
prevented satisfaction of the requirements of the Vail Municipal Code,
Section 12-11-1.D.5, 12-11-S.G. _
3
Other reasons for reversal of the decision of the Design Review Board may be .
brought up at the hearing before the Town Council, but the foregoing will provide the
Council with the general basis for the appeal.
. The required list of adjoining landowners and stamped envelopes accompany
thissmaterial. Again, please advise us of the date of any hearing on this appeal. We
also ask, once again, that you confirm to us, and advise the applicant; that the ,
approval of this proposal is not final and will not be final until a decision is rendered
by the Town Council.
- ResPect
ftft~
D NN, ABP P& URI O, P. .
~
~
,
Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr. . xc: Dome Investment Group
Mr: and Mrs. George Ireland _ 4 -
I
Design Review Appeal - Lauterbach/Carnie
Property Owners and Addresses: " -
Owner of the Subject Property
John A. Carnie and Joan T. Carnie 2920 Mann's Ranch Road
Vail CO 81657 (believed to own fee title)
Michael Lauterbach
Post Office Box 3451
Vail CO 81658 (believed to be under contract to purchase property)
Owners of Adjacent Property:
Tract C, Vail/Potato Patch -
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail CO 81657
Lot 1, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing(744 Sandy Lane)
Charles Ragan and Barbara Ragan
744 Sandy Lane
Vai1 CO 81657
Lot 2, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing(746 Sandy Lane)
Mr. Josef Stauffer
100 East Meadow Drive
Vail CO 81657
Unit A, Lot 3, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing (742 Sandy Lane)
Betty Guffey '
742 Sandy Lane Unit A
Vail CO 81657
Unit B, Lot 3, Vai1/Potato Patch Second Filing (742 Sandy Lane)
Charles Paul and Geraldine Campisi
Forest Drive
Sand Point NY 11050
1
Unit A, Lot 4, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing (740 Sandy Lane)
Mikell Holdings Co. LTD
c/o Karl H. Fauland
Post Office Box 4261
Vail CO 81658
Unit B, Lot 4, Vail/Potato Patch Second Filing(740 Sandy Lane)
Rican Investment Co. Ltd
c/o Karl H. Fauland
Post Office Box 4261 Vail CO 81658
, .
Potato Patch Condominiums and general common elements
(Send to condominium association pursuant to Section 12-3-3.C.3. of the Vail
Municipal Code)
Owners of Potato Patch Condominiums
Potato Patch Condominium Association
c/o Mr. Larry Barnes, Vail Home Rentals
143 East Meadow Drive - Suite 397
Vail CO 81657 Sun Vail Condominiums and general common elements
(Send to condominium association pursuant to Section 12-3-3.C.3. of the. Vail
1Vlunicipal Code)
Owners of Sun Vail Condominiums -
Sun Vail Condominium Association
c/o Mr. Kit Williarris Post affice Box 3655 Vail CO 81658
. 2 -
~
Qucstions? Ca11 thc Placlninb Stai: a: 47;-21 i213
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
*ff,
TOYf'N QGENERAL INF
ORMATiON
This application is for any Projcct rcquiring Design Rcvicw approval. Any projcct rcquiring dcsign revicw must
rcccivc Design Review approval prior to submitting for a building pcrmit For specific information, see the su6nvttal
rcquircmcnts for thc particular approval that is requcSted. Thc application cannot be acceptcd unril all the requircd
inf'ormation is submittcd. Thc projcct may also nccd to bc.rcvictivcd by thc Town Council and/or thc Planning and
Eiivironmental Commission. Design Review Board approval expires onc ycar aftcr final approval unless a
building pcrmit is issued and construction is startcd.
A. DESCR(PTION OE THE REQUEST: T~ A lopR o v1~} L FO R F<t f
y k E's r~ ~Nc ~s
8:---_ ."LOCATtON OF"AROT'OSXL:-EOT: ---BLOCK: FILING: . PHYSICAL ADDRESS: ~~'S ~ o~ Po ?~Td P/4TG-T C Lv(S
C. PARCEL d' 0~i 3 6 0 04 -3~Contact Eaglc Co. Assessors Officc at 970-328-8640 for parcel
D. ZONING: I'C C
E. NAME OF OWNER(S): ~ v ~ T. C A'kmIIE
MAILING DDRESS: 02 9 Z 0 M A'MM'S A-KG 0&)
4-1 L cg 16)S PHONE: 7
F. OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
G. NAME OF APPL ICANT: filtL#47 L (-R' C'-r;rkd~9-C-~(
MAILING ADDRESS: 4 13 3 l
V'~-/ L S(b a S PHONE: ~ 7( 9¢
H. TYPE OF REVIEW AND FEE: c..f~q . -10-0 CA-W •
0 New Consiruction - $200 Constcuction of a new building.
? Addition - $50 Includes any adciition where square footagc is added to any residential or
corruncrcial buitding. ? Minor Alteiation - $20 Includcs minor changes to buildings and site improvcments, such as,
rcroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fenccs and retaining
_ _~_M... _ . , walls, etc.
DRB fees are to be paid at the time of submittal. Later, whcn applying for a, building pemut, piease idenrify
the accurate valuarion of thc project. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according to the project valuation.
PLEASE SUBMI'I' THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VAfL, COLORA,DO 81657. .
.
For-Officg~lse On1 -
: : . ~ .
~
Fea Pai
d
CS~#'
. . :
. .
. . . . . .
. .
ApPlicahoR
. . . ~ :
. . . . : . :
Pre-;Apptication Mceang~.D~te ; ; . . :
~ Design Review Action Form
i~ TOWN OF VAIL
TOWA' OF VAiL ~
Project Name: Potato Patch Creek Project Number:
Project Description: Development of 5 dwelling units in the Residential Cluster zone district
Formerly known as the "Carnie Parcel." Owner, Address, and Phone: John and Joan Carnie
2920 Mann's Ranch Road, Vail CO 81657 '
476-5140
ArchitectJContact, Address, and Phone: Michael Lauterbach
PO Box 3451, Vail, CO 81658 476-6944
Project Street Address: East of Potato Patch Club - No address assigned
Legal Description: Unplatted parcel located directly east of the Potato Patch Club
Parcel Number: Building Name: -
Comments: See conditions. Conceptual review conducted on October 6, 1999:
Board/Staff Action
Motion by: Aasland Action: Approval
Seconded by: Pierce
Vote: 4-0-1 (Gre,enauer abstaining)
COIld1t10riS: 1. Prior to tlie recording of any plat or construction on the Carnie property, the ownerlapplicant shall
secure legal access through the Potato Patch Club property via an access easement or similar uistrument.
2. Prior to the recording of any plat or construcrion on the Carnie property, the owner/applicant shall
obtain written approval from the Potato Patch Club Homeowner's Association for completing
driveway/access improvements (i.e., paving and grading) on the Potato Patch Club properiy. .
3. Final civil engineering plans musi be approved by the Town Engineer for the access road prior to
application for a building permit..
4. The appmval is specific to the Carnie property and does not extend lo property outside the subject
parcel.
Town Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Date: 10/20/99 DRB Fee Pa.id: $250
Proj ect Name: Potato Patch Creek
LAW OFFICES
- DUNN; ABPLANALP & MAURIELLO, P.C.
• PAO~ESSIONwI CORPONATION
JOMN W. OUNN WESTSTAR BANK BUILDING TELEPMONE:
ARTMUR A. ABPLANALP, JR. IOB SOUTM FRONTAGE ROAD WEST (970) 47G-03O0
DIANE MERMAN MAURIELLO . CARRIE HENDON O'NEIL . SUITE 300 FACSIMILE:
- (970) 476-4765
-
Oi COUNSEI: VAiL, COLORADO 81657 amail: vaillew@veil.net
JERRY W. HANNAN GO OCtObeT 1797 CERTIfIED IEGAL ASSISTAN75
' KAREN M. OUNN, ClAS
JANICE K. SCOf'IELD, ClA
Design Review Board
- Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado
Re: Town of Vail Design Review Hearing - Carnie/Lauterbach Proposal •
Members of the Board:
This Firm represents Dome Investment Group (the owners of Condominium Unit
11, Potato Patch Club) and George and Elizabeth Ireland (the owners of Unit 15).
The purpose, of this letter is to provide the Town with our clients' comments
related to the deficiencies in the plan submitted to the Town, including but not limited
to the lack of consent from the owners of the common elements of the Potato Patch
Club whose modification the plan requires and assumes.
Our clients' objections to the pIan include the following:
1. The enrire proposal assumes that access to the project across the
common elements vf the Potato Patch Club has been agreed upon by the _
owners of the common property across which it must pass. That is not
the case. The developer has submitted to the Town a resolution adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Potato Patch Club with the
representation that it is evidence of a letter of intent to grant an
easement, and apparently, of the purported agreement of the Potato
Patch Club to the proposal. The resolution is evidence of neither a letter
of intent nor the agreement of Potato Patch Club or its owners to the
project. It is simply a commitment to negotiate, and the package
presented to the Town, including but not hmited to the indication that
there exists a 40-foot wide easement (which .is false) has little
relationship to the proposal which was originally taken to the PPC and
which generated this resolution. There is no agreement, formal or informal, between Mr. Lauterbach or Mr. Carnie and the Potato Patch
Club Board of Directors regarding a 40-foot wide easement through the
Potato Patch Club. Even the discussions with the Potato Patch Club have
been limited to only a 25-foot wide easement, and they have not touched
upon any ather impacts on or modifications of the Potato Patch Club or
its common areas.
2. The impact on the. Potato Patch Club and its owners has not been
approved by the Potato Patch Club or its owners. In fact, half the
presentation involves changes to the Potato Patch Club, including
changes to the location of parking areas, coverage of open space by
asphalt, relocation of the central postal box location, and-eliminarion of
existing parking spaces, and dramatic changes in landscaping. None of
these changes have been discussed with the Potato Patch Club or the
Potato Patch owners, and the Town has received no suggestion that the
Potato Patch Club or its owners have joined in either the application or
in the conceptual or final-stages of this zeview process; as required by the
Vail Municipal Code at 12-11-4.B.1. and C.I.
3. The zoning may permit the creation of as many as six units on the Carnie
parcel, but the current configuration fails to provide adequate ingress
. and egress. That omission will create impact on Potato Patch Club both.
because (a) it's properry is the access people will use on a practical basis
and (b) its parking area will be the parking area people will use as a.
necessity. , 4. The emergency access may satisfy technical requirements, assuming that
at the rime of any emergency, no one is parked out of the designated area
of the Unit 4 driveway. That cannot be assumed or even assured.
Therefore, no turnaround is provided for emergency vehicles. Even if it
were assumed, only one fire vehicle could possibly get into this project
and be assured of the ability to escape. In the absence of adequate fire
protection, any fire will travel uphill, toward, across and through the
Potato Patch Club. Such problems do not warrant even design approval.
5. Even when viewed on the basis of anticipated conventional use; the road
system does not provide even a bare minimum of access. There is no
allowance for visitors, deliveries or other traffic beyond the basic traffic
generated by the occupants themselves.
6. The access proposed across the front of the hill will create several walls
above the face of the hill. If the property were developed less intensely, .
it is possible that this raad could be constructed in a way in which it has
less impact. The proposal should not be approved unless ther`e is
confirmation that the road cannot be constructed in any other way.
7. Tllere has been no analysis regarding the effect of the proposed changes
on the Potato Patch Club with reference to whether that project conforms
or whether the changes will make it either nonconforming or more non-
confomung.
For example, the specific impacts upon the.owners within the Potato
Patch Club which have not received analysis include the following:
a. Widening and extending the exisring driveway through the Potato Patch Club, and the proposed paving acrivities, will affect the
, exisring open space within the Potato Patch Club, thereby affecting
the percentage of open space within the Potato Patch Club and the
ability of the Club and its owners to develop additional area which
is now undeveloped. Will the widening of the access road and
paving make the Potato Patch Club or its residences non-
conforming or aggravate nonconformity with reference to open
space requirements and/or parking?
b. Widening the road may make existing units non-conforining with
- reference to setbacks and parking requirements which now may
be satisfied or somewhat satisfied by spaces between the garages
and the street, or adjacent to the existing street. Will the widening
of the road affect compliance of the residences or other
improvements within the Potato Patch Club with applicable design
and zoning requirements?
c. Taking out vegetation and trees in the area of the new roadway
which has been proposed by the developer and- installation af
considerable new landscaping within the area of the Potato Patch
Club affected by that plan represent dramaric changes in that area
of the project.
Based upon the information available, it seenns that no analysis has been
done regarding the impacts of these activities on the Potato Patch Club.
8. The proposal assumes significant changes to the properry owned by -
Potato Patch Club owners and construction of a modified access road
across properry owned, in undivided interests, by tlie Potato Patch Club
owners. . The common properry of the Potato Patch Club owners is truly part* of
this project, which is illustrated by the fact that more than half of the
area covered by the plan illustrates the effect on the existing Potato Patch
Club. What is missing is the consent of the owners of the Potato Patch
Club and the common properry across which the road is to be newly
constructed, widened and realigned, all of which will affect every
properry owner in Potato Patch Club between the entry and the site of
the proposed new development.
The Municipal Code pernuts the owner or authorized agent of any project
requiring design approval as prescribed by the Design Review provisions of the
Municipal Code to submit plans for conceptual review and requires the owner or
authorized agent of any project requiring design approval to submit material for final
design approval. It doesn't matter whether considerarion is conceptual or final
approval, the Town requires the signatures of the owners of property which is the
subject of a project. The consent of the owners of half the land affected by this project
has not been required or submitted in tliis case, and the effect of the proposed project
upon the parking, site coverage and landscaping within the Potato Patch Club
illustrates the reason for this requirement.
The changes proposed for the Potato Patch Club are dramatic and affect the
Club as a whole. Those changes are an inherent part of this project. For that reason
alone, the fact that the application and plan lacks the approval of the Potato Patch
Club owners, this project should be denied until such time as a package can be
presented which has the consent of all affected owners, including not only the owners
of the Carnie properry but also the owners of the Potato Patch Club across whose land
the proposed access road passes. The addirional facts that the irnpacts of the
proposed changes to the Potato Patch Club have not received any analysis, and that
the proposed change operates to defeat public safety further aggravate the
fundamental problem. The project should not receive design review approval without
resolution of these issues. Very s,
UNN, ABP & U O, C.
Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr.
xc: Dome Investment Group
Mr. and Mrs. George Ireland
~ #Z
i 1 =zo~
PROPOSED FIRE TRUCK ~ U aal
TURNING RADIUS EXHIBIT ` PEDJ~
~ W.A
SCALE I' a 20'
qu El'V. ~ 1258 1 i
( " UMP7 EIEV.. 8149.3' I ~1 OiZ~ ~
%P~ U JI~„
~8
I 1 O Q g u~o
A Y.
4 X °mm• < W o~
SCALE: 1" = 20'_ ~
N PNONE ~ Q
y ro' I ~ nm 9C~F0
curvoE mxnnc iOiQ fAT ACREIGE = 1.366 Ac. (59.500 Sq. FtJ W
aeoius -.s LLJ
3 145iDE N4NMC PRn'OSCO fIAE • \ B TOUL ARFA IN IXCE$$ OF IOx $LOPE = 3630 5¢ fl. f~ I
R~I15 . 30• ~'JP tiRMNG L.~
I " PAp115 h \ ~ •
I a ' Up
.WFAS iN 5 Cf SLO
\ a ~ ~ IMpUlES QCE5
MS PE go
~ ~ 21 1! iJl 1 Z=
Q
~ o 5
`
0,7
o
i. ~
. • , ~ - \ NY i1D~U(lN0 CL
I.
~(TIP, ~ W Q ~
nRE
' 71'M9.S3' . \
~ PNOPOSEA xDUfES u+ VERGFFEn iRCE ~ ~
A1 CM WM IIS /POi01. OMe1ER ~ J .
. ` ~ L~~ UNIT 14 ~ Q
+ r " no-utcs A occcucus ,vf¢ Q
wtM iS Iv-fi71COIwEtER >
~
~ a 1 1f1V \ ,
~
r ~SE-ER MMHOLE
Voir `p~mtm [in. : ei~ o
.r
CLC:,E UNR 13 4 ar wnH rts
b./ xv ~
:eaua ;.f ~ I
n
SE1e~ r Nv ar . e2eze
0 i.ox I urv vro PROPOSM EDGE
na rra a .
~OMAIM ~
~ O~ ~...um;ntAuuvn
(APPNOMIWi[, HOf fULLY
~ UIYE1490NED Ox vUn
1 (n ~ NEN90NS
IS CaURT TENNIS COURi
0
,mta
~
~av TMici
5
A ! ~ z wv n .mu.s
1Ce UNR 12 iu / s.~ ~
~ iNv a nx.e
~Of/ 0I' I ~
R 60.0' ~7}AFES
O pp yp MPQ A
v r . az~~,
cn
w cuR cw.a
a sn~ ~ i
~ l ~If?~~' ` ~~j UNIT 11 / n N0°raa~art /1
~ 7-c)
R S'~
~ a ~ao'
EMISTNG TAO C M 21
P~PofFGMEA WM Ai tf1Sf
c 3` H19R1Hi 3' OF CIMAIRµa ro mcc
u= R
Pew
0
. ~ lCE 6 ~ R 20'~ iPIE N c x .
LCE - io o. rFViw (m.) /
~ s n-ki Yxa m La r
E ro , c ~ ~ ~w~su ~ o ~ 03'' --2 w~aM /v ~aw ¢tv. . e~za.r
m[
~ ec wo~o ca e~ie.i~
=00.6
'AM (M.)
y ..6' . 7AEI 10 (NVO
E?CF d ' ~ ,df~~~ /
PROPoSD OPo -0
[WI O~RIlM..tlMTi~LL ~ .
.,c~f L
o UNIT 10 ~o.e• ,
~B~rTNEwa DE9GNED: Mi
' ~RUO ~la Mmc~vypi r a fi ORANN: MT
-'/x RENENEO: JE
PLC JOBp: 75
R 8 UNIT 9 PED-p uwc k u-siTE
voiar a' ~o.c rc.., • 6-.~ ~ L qe. ~s ~ 1 \ DA7E: 9/29/99
37.
BEGinNIxc~-~.
S 4757'Y - I059.19' ~g~~ ~ S 89'55' W - 336.55' ,,,~,,,.J
~ a aw~c a sa Pm. ~ EXNIBIT
iui Ig w'-Aaax aw~a i ro a er a Saac a arosm u ren~ Ci 1
~ SN ^.CF4ER :TC. 6 p7MF Wl AAMI MUES 2-1 OR BETRR 30FC MNL (IW)
/ / 7 5 S. P 80 h, 51h P.Y. SNf6&i1P0YG?J3iMN~
WA~L
~x+ru w+.ro~~ y ,
~ I o
C -
nini oiv • eilss : 1' / ~ .
n~
n a °
F, D O, u o
C) C ~
e ss. ;
i ~,E~
- tto .n h
N . a
1 °
~ m
o
O
01'
V
a•
~
o.r
+ ~ ,
; - ,
} PROPOSED SITE AREA P!ttNT LIST
UIJI( i4
1 .p, / cnnnu w,.l
.
_
_
K~ ...=BOiANIfJ~L wU1E COMMON NAME OTY. SIZE PEMARN$ ~
L
~ ~ \
~ ,
1 \ TREES: PP PICfA PUNCENS COtOwt00 SPflUCE JO N/A 512E5 NO7ED ON GUN W
~
PA PpPUUS AUGI1SfIfOLN NAAROwIEIf COTiDNWOpD 11 2 111' bL
! ~
VT POVUlUS TREMUl01DE5 OUNaNG ASPEN 12 2 1/2' G11.
UNIT 13 raocasto ~ +U 4 oecm ntv. . msa.r
r x~,~, I --,t , I I U
ShRUBS: cs COPNUS SERICFA rteo rxic oawooo io T cu
l ~ ~ : ~ an vm
It OSEp ~ i5 JUNIPEPUS SA81NA 'BUflILO' BUFF0.l0 JUNIPER 7 ]GAL ~ O
i I
01~, ~ . ~ --aI~s upNUM Q
w.a eeJ~
g OO AI.71NE YELLOW CURNMR 9 5 G!L v
/ ~
1
r SauBULUS PUBENS NaTNE F10ER 8 5GAy o
J
uuwar x ~
~sr vnm
y 1VROxuuiF. MDt FVU
r
D+maioitD an Mq SP SRINGI % PRESTONUE GNIMW LMC 12 7 GAL < O
RT 0 4D V18URNUM DENiATUM ARROWHFAD YgUANUAI 9 7 G1L cL
J
~ '~~;I UNIf 12 _ GROUND FO'.LL POM/f PtANfING ARFAS TO VuvF CEHEHNUL AND NIHUA1 ROWERS .NO cnauHOCOKxs. >
/ u! COVER: _SEIECTiON5 WILL BE DEtERMINEp Ai iHE iuAE Oi' -PIANiING, JUE TO iNE SEASONK AVMIBIUfY Oi np5 mE 0F PIANi wiEpuL O
~o cw
~ m NQTE: Al1 OISIUPBEO AqFAS f0 BE NEVECE7A1E0 WRH NA
! l 'r / / fnKLro[~m e ~ ,
:61s~ _ f~ / / I I 1NE CWSSES AND WILROWEH SEED pl%.
b ~
I _
I
PAlPO-$p iNA[[
LM GMACC
` ~l' I
I •f~
UNIT I I ~HmN N~
PROPOSED CONCE°TUAL RESIDENTIAL PLANT UST (rrnICAL rwrt usr aen Moiecsrtt)
Y
u.rY KCY ~BOiuriCN. ruuE CODUOrv tuHE Ott. S2E REwxKS
ae cKisnHC MB uuus eRwzrw .
wroxnxt ~ 4 s\ u ur'..-._ TREES: BMNDYYIINE CPABMPIE 4 Y 1/2' G4.
rvNOI[ tPCE Idl d .l y _ -1 i
- ei~ uO~ED q0 bU 0RM PP PICFA PVNCENS COlOM00 SVkUCE J N/A SIlES NOiEO ON PLAN
. tncc Pro.~ ~0 a,. , ai• ~ J'"`_ nq c ~ .1
ae coPUws wcusnrow
waaowicu conor+wooo s
2 t/s Cx.
o .
t SnWp IW,MWIE Pf POPULUS ifiCYUl010ES OUNfINC
ISPEN
R
1 • e' ~ o. ` O / I / 1 / y / I~ ~Y ELLY. . Vn l' 4 "
0 "
1/7
' L
G
, o.
;0. • 1' ~ ' • ! ' i~t~ . / unEm nn. . e21e.1-
. ':00' . . '~n,..~•~~ BT~
PAu PSEUppi5UG1 YEN2IESII OpUGUS Flp
4
21/I'Gl
ap'USCD OFi1 „ :Oe' \ q • ' 'S n owg2qQ~~ ~,p ~ / J ~ -
i0 o.e + • ~ 19 ~i ~ SHRU85: cs coeHUS s[Rku e[o iwic oocwooo 6 5 CAL
-
. aa ~ i •
CSM CTIISUS SCOPARIUS 'MOONUp1Y A100NlICNT BR004 10 5 GAL
. ~
~
~
~ . + . ~ ~ ' _ / . ~ 1 • J/i JAMCSU IJ/ERICAMI WN(FLOWER 6 ~y GAL
G . ' \ : j
- nCD\ 4- JS
~ - JU
r NIPEpUS SABINA BUPfAlO BUFPALO JUNIPER 3 5 Gl m
y1~-I>~1 ` • ~ - e ,
~ yu T J ~ . _ -auoWStY' S'~'_ j, "PM PHYSOCMPU$ GONOCYNU$ MOUN7AIN NINEBMK J 5 G1L _ V Ml ~N U
_ s : wP ~u.~ ~ one~xc[ n+sx bg 55'~W 336.55'
' w+Cr~5C0 Ml~w+l6 ~ ~ p ~ PSIA PINUS MUGMU o
Y
Q/ ~22 \ 4UC0 PINE 2 s cu m
rx coantx s[c e " u;~+=.I ~'wuus-+.u a' t~u' a~un
. r e s. A o~. - v~_mc au ww Ai .i.sJ; 5 PNOPOXD I:f`BqlO[A xo. ~ - - -
_ s a ae.r.wrt-+e rna i / / saoc SG arIUS GInBRA CiS u0N1AfU ROCNy yOUNINN SUNAC 1 7 GAl a uw~t = ~ /
.
. SC SWBUCUS 7UBCN5 N4fIVE qpE
q J 5 CAl
SP SYRINGA % PRESIONIAE GNAOLW UUC I 7
G>l
_ Z w ~
. "0 NBURNUM O(NiAfUM MflOWI{FM YIBUNNUM m
1 S GAl G U ~
~ - ~~=LIN11NAf~Y _~'1~JC?JCArDE PLAN
G30UN0 ALL OtRNED PWIIING HEOS 10 MAYE PENCNNUL ANO ANNUFI FIOwCR$ AND GHOUNOCOKRS.
COVEI3; SClEC1lUNS wILL OE OCICR4IN[p AI IME iIMC OF PLWYiNC, OUE ID fM( SfA50t1AL AVI1LABIUR' OF THIS IYPE Of PW1T AIAI(qlµ.
. . .
NOIE. N.L OISIUFOEO AHEAS i0 BC REy(CCIAICD Wi1H MAi1vE GMSSES H+0 wlLflOwCR SEED uiM. ;cni.F- 1° = 20'-0"
i
- . o ~
i-
W J
T
.
4VAIL
TOWN OF 75 South Frontage Road - • • ,
Vail, Colorado 81657 ~
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157 NOTICE OF APPLICATION
TM
The parcel shown on the map on the back side of this page, zoned Residential Cluster
(allows up to 6 dwelling units per acre), is currently under review for a proposed single-
family residential development of 5 dwelling units.. The project is currently scheduled for
review by the Design Review Board on August 18, 1999, however this date could
, change. This notice is being provided to you as a courtesy as it is not required by the
Town Code.
If you have any questions regarding the project or want to review the application you
may do so at the Community Development Department located at 75 S. Frontage Roacl,
Vail, CO 81657.
You may also contact the Project Planner for this application, Dominic Mauriello, at 970-
479-2148.
The Design Review Board agenda will be available on our website 24 hours prior to the
meeting - vail.net/tov. ,
,
RECYCLED PAPER
, ¦ ~ Location M-ap
o~3t I
TRACT A
81DdC1 BW 30 ~ ,
VAIL POTATO PATC
POTATO P
~ TDWNNOMEB
~
~O 766
10
~ 2,3 4 - - ~52 m
A
~
TRACT p
omaamm
00p°~° TATO PATCH DR 3 5
'
r ~5e
` ` ?a . 2 J AT ATC
~JJ <f~~ i~ 'c~~> >sa ~
^ ~ n IL 2
;
1` 5 T!E - 748
POTAT~ ~A~QNjC L: ; .
s~w
- 740
r 742 2 7m
~TALRiANT V 744
,
' 97 ou Blli 1
POTATO PATCN
SµDSroNE CLIIBCOPNOMIIYUN ~ ~ -
PARK REpBAIip9TONEE:EM1ENTARY
i ~
~ rl- 1 ~'~::~i:%:: SE7
- AR90K7R£E J~L'f 1\ L`~ \v~? .
890
TRACT C
PK48E 1 ~10
] AS N PHASE nt PHASE a
005
TR
gm aa+ rwSE
3 ow
U18lATTf_D 1 2 893 A 91INVNL
I ~ 8B7
. 19,
RED DSTONECIR TRACT
x 5 P V
9ab
~ 9" 7- ' m a VAIL LIONSHEAD
~ A" s~ FILING 4
9
~3 o L,e, SMDS,ONE 1
TRACTB ~ FILI G 9 70TLaT NOR7}IUAY
ANDSTONE a ea, `mpw `p'
so
- 70 ~ aea ~
U YAILCi-0 ~ .
g{ 979
~U 71
B/5 701
B7a L~~LLO ~ LANDPAARK
>CTO TPACTA 12 ' I as .
810
9R5 ~
7 n '818 .
N
Subject Property
E
" S
~~~~l. ~4~ ~
JOINT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS
OF THE POTATO PATCH CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
WHEREAS, the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association, Inc. (hereinafter
referred to as the "Association") is currently a party to certain litigation initiated by John A.
Camie and Joan T. Carnie (the "Carnies") requesting the condemnation of a certain easement
over property owned by the Association in order to obtain access to a landlocked parcel of land
located adjacent toAssociation property and currently owned by the. Carnies (the "Carnie
Property").
~
WHEREAS, the Association has been advised that the Carnies may desire to sell
their property to MJL Development Inc. and/or Michael J. Lauterbach and/or their assigns or
affiliates,(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Potential Purchaser").
WHEREAS, initial discussions have taken place between authorized
representatives of the Association and the Potentia] Purchaser concerning the purchase of the
Carnie Property and the possible grant of an access easeinent over Association property by the
Association to Potential Purchaser.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Association have reached a general
understanding with Potential Purchaser regarding the process by which Potential Purchaser could
obtain an access easement from the Association at an agreed upon location if Potential Purchaser
actually obtains title to the Carnie Property.
WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser obtains approval of the Town of Vail (and all
other governmental entities with jurisdiction over the subject property) "for Potential Purchaser's
development plans and specifications (the "Plans and Specifications") with respect to the Carnie
Property, the prospects of a transfer of title to the Carnie Property to the Potential Purchaser are
greatly increased.
WHEREAS, in order to obtain approval of the Plans and Specifications for the
development of the Carnie Property, Potential Purchaser has advised the Association that
Potential Purchaser requires a letter of intent from the Association agreeing to grant to Potential
Purchaser an easement for ingress and egress over Association property to the Carnie Property at
the location specified in the Plans and Specifications.
WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser is able to acquire the Carnie Property and
obtain from the Association the easement for ingress and egress more particularly described
herein, the litigation filed by the Carnies with respect thereto could be dismissed and the
Association could be released from the obligation to defend such action.
WHEREAS, on June 4, 1999 the Boai•d of Directors of the Association adopted a
resolution (by a vote of six to two) recommending that the Board of Directors bring to the
owners and members of the Association at the annua] meeting; a resolution authorizing the
Association to pursue the matters more particularly described herein.
417498 1 RCiAI.T 0911199 2 _ i7 P11
~
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, in accordance with
Section 183 ).4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Condominiums:
1. The Board of Directors of the Association is hereby authorized to grant an
easement for ingress and egress to Potential Purchaser upon satisfaction of all of the terms and
conditions therefor set forth in this Resolution.
2. The grant of the subject easement for ingress and egress (the "Easement")
shall be subject to the satisfaction of each and every one of the following conditions by Potential
Purchaser:
(a) Acquisition of the Carnie Property by Potential Purchaser;
(b) Final plat approval by the Town of Vail of the Plans and
Specifications for development of the Carnie Property (the "Development");
(c) The Development shall contain no more than five (5) single family
residences and shall, not exceed 3,500 square feet GRFA, developed and built in
accordance with the site plan attached hereto;
(d) A 30 foot setback from the Association's easf property line shall be
. established in the Plans and Specifications and maintained by Potential Purchaser;
- (e) The Easement shall not be more than 25 feet in width, and the
turning radius of the Easement within the Association property must be approved by the
Town. of Vail Fire Department and the Association Board of Directors;
(f) The written evidence of the Easement must provide that all costs of
surveying, complying with Town of Vail planning requirements, all construction
(including road construction), landscaping and rounding of the entrance, as well as the
restoration of any Association property which is altered or damaged during construetion,
shall be borne solely by Potential Purchaser;
(g) Potential Purchaser shall, upon execution of the formal
documentation of the Easement, pay to the Association the sum of $250,000, which shall
be allocated by the Association as condemnation award damages as specified in
Section 33.4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club Condominiums;
(h) The written documentation of the Easement shall contain, or
coincide with other documentation executed by the Association and Potential Purchaser,
a full settlement of the Carnie litigation with prejudice;
(i) The Easement shall not be granted until such time as Potential
Purchaser has obtained fee title to the Carnie Property;
(j) Upon issuance of and in conjunction with the execution of a letter
of intent to grant the Easement to Potential Purchaser by the Association, the Carnies
must agree and stipulate to a reasonable continuance and vacation of the trial date and
ananx 1 RGAt.i ns.,,'qq, 57 Pni 2
.
I
abatement of all legal proceedings in the current condemnation litigation, pending
completion of the Town of Vail planning process with respect to the Plans and
Specifications of Potential Purchaser for the Development. FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Association is hereby
authorized to issue a non-binding letter of intent to the Potential Purchaser specifying the
parameters and limitations with respect to the Easement set forth above and any other limitations
and/or conditions required by the Board of Directors or counsel for the Association for the
possible grant of the Easement to Potential Purchaser. Such letter of intent must contain an
acknowledgment by the Potential Purchaser that the issuance of the letter of intent and the
execution of the Easement shall in no way be construed to be an approval by the Association (or
any of its members) of the Development or the Plans and Specifications, and that all mennbers of
the Association and the Association itself reserve all rights to participate in any Town of Vail
planning process relating to the development of the Carnie Property. Potential Purchaser must
further acknowledge that certain members of the Association may be opposed to the grant of the
Easemerrt and may actively participate in such Town of Vail planning process.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that within the limitations and parameters set forth
above, the Board of Directors of the Association shall be and is hereby authorized, empowered
and directed to negotiate, eYecute and, as necessary, record the above-described letter of intent
and the final definitive written Easement in conjunction with counsel for the Association, and to
negotiate a f nal settlement of the Carney litigation, NA-ith prejudice, as of the result of the grant of
the Easement. ,
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors is and shall be authorized,
empowered and directed to eYplore the possibility of creating a sub-association with respect to
the final approved development of the Carnie Property for the purposes of:
(a) sharing the cost of maintenance, repairs and snow removal for the
Easement;
(b) access to and appropriate cost sharing in the maintenance, repair
and capital improvements to the common elements of the Association, including the
tennis courts, pool, spa and health club; and _
(c) . to amend the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club
Condominiums to include the above-described provisions, subject to the approval of the
owners and mortgagees of units within the Association as required by such Declaration,
with such other terms and conditions contained therein as may be required by the Board
of Directors and counsel for the Association as appropriate.
~417498 1 RG.4LT 08.%2199 2 i7 PM
' ~
~
The undersigned, as President of the Association, hereby certifies that the
Resolutions contained herein were duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors and the
members of the Association at the annual meeting of the Association conducted on July 2, 1999 and the subsequent Board of Directors meeting held immediately thereafter. -
Thomas J. Gargan, M.D., esiden f the,
Association
Approved and accepted this ~ day of st 999.
Michael J. Lau rbach
417498 1 RGALT 09/2l49 ^_57 p\1 4
December 1, 1999
Vail Town Council 75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear TC Members:
Enclosed is a fairty recently completed resume that provides you
with a lot of information that you probably don't want to know. The
things that you do need to know are pretty simple. I have worked
with most of you over the past few years on a variety of projects and
I thirik my commitment to Vail. is clear.
Having led the battle for the return of the Business License Fee to
Vail, this newly formed Marketing District is an alternative to what
we were attempting to achieve. The future of Vail lies in our ability
to survive in an industry that is more competitive than our founder's
could ever have imagined. But survival isn't enough. We need to
position ourselves in the millenium so that we are able to regain our
number one rating and return Vail to the glorious position that it
held in the past, a time when Vail was the bench mark against which
all other ski resorts were measured.
But more than that, we have to revitalize this Town so that every one
who works here and lives here and visits here recognizes this
community as the leader in the industry and a joyful place to be.
I believe very strongly in the Town of Vail and I am commited to
returning it to its premier position.
1
r
1riCP1' ,
~
KATHLEEN V. FERRY
2395 BALD MOUNTAIN RQAD
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
11/91 to present The Grind, Vail, Colorado
Owner/Operator
Own and operate a coffee shop that also serves a wide
variety of food items. It also operates as a full service
bar that provides entertainment in the evening.
11/91 to present Vail Associates, Vail, Colorado
Ski instructor
3/95 to 12/98 Aspen Mountain Coffee Roasters, Aspen,
Colorado
Owner/Operator
Owned and operated a coffee roasting facility in the
Roaring Fork Valley.
6/93 to 4/99 Vail Mountain Coffee Roasters, Minturn,
Colorado
Owner/Operator
Owned and operated a coffee roasting facility in the
Vail Valley.
1//84 to 1/89 Vidmar Buick, Joliet, Illinois
Owner/Manager
Managed the Employment Department of a family owned
business. Also had responsibilily for the Customer Order
Department.
2/68 to 9/70 The Lange Company, Broomfield, Colo.
Personnel Director
Responsible for over 1000 factory positions and an office
and sales staff of 125 in Colorado, Iowa and Canada-hiring,
wage aild salary administration,training programs, policy
and administrative handbOOkS.
6/66 to 2l68 Marsh and McLennan, Chicago, Illinois
Personnel Director
Responsible for corporate office functions of major inter-
national company-hiring,wage and salary administration,
corporate and college grad training programs,policy and
administrative manuals on a corporate basis and
specifically for a 650 staff office in Chicago. (over)
12-61-1999 01 :36PM FROM PROPERTy 8 HOTEL M[MT. TO 19704792157 P. 92
` F~C~ct. ~d i ~ t
I
' Evergreen Lodge
~
I V A 1 L
t
I December 1.1999
~
~ Sent Via FAX_ 970-479-2157
;
f
i . ~ Ms. Pam Brandmeyer i Assistant Tawn Manger
~ VAIL TOWN GOVERNMENT
i 75 S. Frontage Road West
~ Vail, Colorado 81657
I
' Dear Ms. Brandmeyer.
~ Via this letter I wish to express my interest in a position on the local Marketing Distrid Advisory
~ Board. Currently I am involved as an ownership partner and officer of the management team
~ af Evergreen Lodge at Vail. I first came to Vail in 1969, became a r+esidential property owner in
~ fhe `70's and business owner 1986 and again in 1992.
' My irrterest in becaming a Board member is generated by a desire to increase business in the
i area and to see an improvement guest experience and service. As a participant in lodge
; ownership and operations ! recagnize the importance ot developing and maintaining the flow of
~ visitors to the Valley and am vitaAy concemed that the experience guests have be of highest
; quality, whether they are here for work, play or a combination of the two. My previous .
~ professional experience includes serving as Public Relations Manager for Vail and 8eavel'
~
Creek Resorts from 1980 through 1996. Subsequently I started a public relations firm working
with clients as AEI Wor1d Forum in Beaver Creek; American Ski Cfassic; Aspen Skiing
Company; Breckenridge Resort Westin Hotel, Vai(; C{arion Hotels & Resorts; Radisson Hotel,
Denver, and Sybervision Sports, focusing on marketing and distribution of the ski related
series.
~
~ If positions remain open on the Board 1 am anxious to move to the next step. 1 wiil be available
4 to meet with you or a selection committee at your convenience and can be reached either at
~ Evergreen Lodge, 970-476-7814 ar on my ce11 phone, 303-601-2098. I laok forward to talking
with you soon.
' Sincerely,
1 CZ~~~..
~ Pamela Stenmark
( Vice President, Marketing & Project Devefopment
PS/sgp
250 South Frontage Road Wast
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-476-7810 FAX 303-476-4504 Reservctions only 800-284-8245
t
~
Memorandum
To: Town Council
From Nina Timm
Date: December 7, 1999
Subject: Commercial Linkage Program
Attached please find a memo from Kathy McCormick, McCormick and Associates, Inc.,
the consultant the Town retained to facilitate a public process on Commercial Linkage.
Her memo summarizes what was included in the Council packets on November 23, 1999.
This memo will be the outline for her presentation at the work session on December 7,
1999. In this presentation Ka.thy will outline the key policy questions that Council will
need to address as well as provide an outline for next steps.
: . .
: Town of Vai! - Commercia/ Linkage
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town of Vail
FROM: Kathy McCormick
McCormick and Associates, Inc.
DATE: December 2, 1999
RE: Commercial Linkage
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a foltow-up to the report presented to
Council in November. That report summarized the research done to date regarding
commercial linkage programs in resort communities. This memo focuses on the issues
which council may wish to consider when creating a linkage program. The suggested
next steps for proceeding with the development of a program are also included in this
material.
BACKGROUND:
The Town of Vail is interested in implementing a commercial linkage program as one
approach to be used to produce housing that is affordable to area woFkers. To further
this effort, research was done in five resort communities to ascertain the following:
1. The amount of affordable housing that was created as a result of the linkage
program;
2. The methods used to create the housing (e.g. fees, taxes, on-site or off-site
development);
3. The impact on local businesses as a result of implementing the linkage
program; and
4. The economic impact to the community.
In addition to this research, two series.of focus groups were conducted with
representatives of hotels, bars/restaurants and institutional/real estate and retail
businesses. The first series of focus group was designed to provide an overview of a
commercial linkage program and solicit in-put from focus group participants. The
second series of focus groups provided an opportunity for more in-depth discussion
about a commercial linkage program and its perceived impacts and opportunities for the
Town of Vail.
OVERVIEW:
Current Program
Currently, the Town of Vail has a goal to house 62% of its workforce in the community
and is focusing efforts to achieve this goal. Examples of developments undertaken by
the town to meet this goal include Vail Commons, Buzzard Fark, the buy down program,
and Red Sandstone. Timber Ridge has been noted as a primary source of employee
housing (198 units). In the focus groups, it was noted that Timber Ridge is an important
source of affordable rental housing and efforts need to be directed toward retaining
. McCormick and Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 5
.
Town of Vail - Commercral Linkage ;
Timber Ridge as affordable housing. One suggestion was to grant additional density in
exchange for redeveloping the site as affordable housing. Other programs are also
under consideration at this time.
The efforts currently underway in Vail are important, particularly considering some of the
findings from the Eagle Valley Housing Needs Survey that was completed in July, 1999.
Some of the findings support continued efforts in the arena of affordable housing:
1. Approximately 42% of employers surveyed plan to increase the number of
: persons they employ; •
2. Avon and Vail house the lowest percentage of their workers - 30% to 35%
respectively. Approximately 65% of Vail's residents who work are employed
in Vail; and
3. Commercial linkage and inclusionary zoning was supported by 70% of county
residents.
LINKAGE PROGRAMS:
Creating affordable housing has often been described as a patchwork quilt - many
pieces are patched together to create an overall housing program. Linkage Programs ,
are one piece of an overall effort and are focused on the housing needed to "keep up"
with demand for housing generated as a result of new development. Linkage programs
do not correct a current deficit; however, without linkage programs the community
continues to fall behind in meeting its housing needs.
The basic premise of linkage programs is that new commercial development brings
employees to an area, which increases the demand for housing which is affordable to
those employees. The housing market will supply new units at prices and rents that
cover the cost of new construction, including land, but will not provide housing at prices
and rents below the cost of construction. In a high-cost area, such as Vail, land prices
have been escalating rapidly and the cost of new construction tends to be high, placing it
out of reach of many low and moderate-income employees. If affordable housing is not
provided to meet the demand from new workers, the result is increasing pressure on the
existing affordable housing stock. Specific impacts include higher prices and lower
- availability (low vacancy rates), as well as increased commuting from lower cost areas.
Commercial linkage programs attempt to mitigate these problems by requiring
developers to contribute to the provision of affordable housing that is consistent with the
income of persons employed within the development, particularly the lower and
moderate wage groups who cannot afford market rate housing.
FOCUS GROUP SUMMARY:
The memo provided to Council on November 23`d provides a thorough synopsis of the
focus group discussions held in October. A follow-up session was held on November
301h. Generally, focus group participants recognize that a commercial linkage program is
one part of an overall housing strategy and finding employees has been difficult due to a
lack of affordable housing. The primary concerns expressed by the focus groups is that
the mitigation requirement should not be so onerous as to stymie new commercial
development and redevelopment in Vail. There is also a concern about where new
employee housing could be located, given the constraints on available land in Vail. For
McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 2 of 5
.
; Town of Vail - Commercia/ Linkage
smaller employers, there is a concern about how the costs of mitigation would be passed
on to them. There was also discussion about the types of housing to be produced
(rental vs. for-sale) and the type of worker for whom the housing should be targeted
(seasonal workers vs. full-time residents). There were individuals form the hotel and
institutional groups that were cautiously supportive while others did express concern
about moving forward.
Some suggestions made by focus group participants that are worth considering
included:
• Implementing a countywide property tax to address the current shortage of employee housing;
• Exchanging forest service land for open space and using that land for
housing;
• Requiring a lower level of mitigation for housing developed within the town
and a higher mitigation requirement if the units are located down valley;
• Providing an incentive, such as additional density, to help off-set the
mitigation requirements; and
• Providing additional density at Timber Ridge to enhance the potential that it
would be redeveloped at some future time as employee housing.
PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS:
Five resort communities were interviewed to learn more about their linkage programs. It
became clear through these interviews that the local goals, priorities and opportunities
were carefully considered when developing a program. For example, Teton County was
concerned with housing for seasonal workers and allows off-site development as well as
acquisition of existing housing to be used to meet the mitigation requirements.
Through the focus groups, constraints that must be considered by the town when
establishing a commercial linkage program were discussed. The most notable
constraint is the lack of available sites upon which additional employee housing could be
constructed. Although this may be the case, there was also a sense that a"modest"
linkage program would be important to indicate that new development is contributing
toward solving the employee housing problem. Following are some of the issues to be
considered further prior to implementing a linkage program:
1. What level of mitigation should be required? Legally, a community can
require 100% mitigation based on the results of a nexus analysis; however,
most communities do not seek full mitigation. This is because a balance has
to be struck between the amount of housing to be produced and the costs
associated with its productions. If the cost is too high, then commercial
development and redevelopment may be stymied. For example, Aspen
requires 60% of employee housing needs to be mitigated and has seen very
little new commercial development over the fast five years. Vail is in a period
of desired re-development and would have to carefully consider the balance
between needed re-development and addressing housing issues.
2. Where should the housing be {ocated? Many communities require that the
housing be built as part of the new development or located within the
McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 3 of 5
r
Town of Vail-Commercia/ Linkage t
community. Due to the constraints of available land for development, Vail
may wish to consider allowing development to occur down valley. One
suggestion is to have a lower mitigation level for housing developed within
the community and a higher requirement if the units were produced down
valley.
3. Would cash-in-lieu be acceptable? Most communities provide for a cash-
in-lieu payment, particularly for smaller projects. Usually, there is a desire to
have the units built because of a perception that cash could be collected and
not used for production of additional housing. Some communities accept
cash-in-lieu and use it to acquire existing housing and/or develop housing -
themselves. Vail has experience in successfully developing housing and may
wish to consider a cash-in-lieu program.
4. Where are the existing housing opportunities? This involves an
assessment of potential development sites. Housing sites have been
identified tMrough the Common Ground process. However, it must be
determined if these sites are still acceptable to the Town Council and whether
they should be used as part of a linkage program.
5. What incentives could be considered along with mitigation
requirements? It was suggested that the town consider density bonuses as
part of an incentive package to offset some of costs of the mitigation
requirements.
6. What type of housing is needed? The nexus study generally defines those
households with limited opportunities to purchase or rent units; however, the
town could further define whether or not to produce rental units, for-sale
housing or housing for seasonal workers. For example, the focus groups
noted that housing for seasonal workers is one of its greatest needs.
Although this may be the case, there was also a concern that affordable for-
sale housing be produced for entry-level management workers as a way to
create a stronger sense of community. Addressing these issues in light of
community goals will help refine the types of units to be produced under a
linkage program and their location.
7. What are the opportunities for regional cooperation? There may be
opportunities to collaborate on the establishment of a commercial linkage
program throughout the valley. Other potential areas for collaboration include
joint development of specific properties. A suggestion made at a focus group
session was to pursue a countywide property tax to generate revenues to be
used to address current affordable housing needs. Clearly, this effort would
require regional cooperation.
NEXT STEPS:
Following are the recommended next steps to be considered by the Town of Vail:
1. Initiate discussions with the Eagle County Commissioners. Eagle
County has had some conversations regarding the development of a
commercial linkage program. It has not proceeded with a program at this
McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 4 of 5
t
t Town of Vail - Commercia/ Linkage
time. A coordinated effort could lessen the chances of developers "shopping"
communities for those that do not have linkage requirements. In addition, the
discussions could include defining opportunities for collaborating on
affordable housing development that might occur throughout the valley.
2. Evaluate the potential commercial development and redevetopment that
could occur in Vail. This would provide a basis for determining the potential
number of new units that could be created as a result of a commercial linkage
program using different levels of mitigation. This effort would assist the Town
of Vail in establishing an acceptable level of commercial mitigation.
3. Address the discussion points listed in the previous section. One option
for proceeding with this aspect is to establish a"working group" made up of
key staff and community members who would evaluate and consider various
options for implementation of a commercial linkage program. In addition,
larger public forums would need to be conducted to communicate what a
linkage program is and to solicit public comment.
4. Perform the nexus analysis. This involves establishing the employee
generation rates that could occur as a result of new development. This
information is needed to establish the legal basis for requiring a commercial
linkage program.
5. Develop a program ordinance and administrative guidelines.
A presentation and discussion of this information is scheduled for December 7`h. I look
forward to the opportunity to meet with you and share this information and answer any
questions you may have at that time.
McCornuck and Associates, Inc. Page 5 of 5
, . _ . ' " . .
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, December 1, 1999
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Clark Brittain Bill Pierce
Hans Woldrich Galen Aasland (PEC)
Melissa Greenauer
SITE VISITS 2:00 pm
1. Ski Club Vail - 598 Vail Valley Drive
2. Buffehr Creek Park-1950 Chamonix
Driver: George
PUBLIC HEARtNG - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm
1. One Vail Place - Final review of sign application and proposed exterior modifications. Allison
244 Wall Street / Block 5C, Vail Village 1St Filing.
Applicant: Tom Sapiro
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0
APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS:
1. That there be copper flashing above the windows.
2. That the bay window roofs be standing seam copper.
3. That the entry roofs be cedar shakes.
4. That the hardware on the doors be replaced with decorative elements.
5. That the lighting meet code.
6. That the cedar boards be vertical.
2. Groshire duplex - Final review of a new two family residence. , Dominic
5166 Black Gore Drive / Lots 4& 5, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision
Applicant: A&G Development, represented by TAB Associates
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 4 CONDITIONS:
1. Road shall be constructed per the plan prepared by Alpine Engineering with the addition of a
4' wide concrete pan at edge of asphalt.
2. The ditch in front of Lot 3 must be restored or pipe must remain.
41ML
TO}9N1
3. A Building Permit Application shall not be submitted until the plat and all required easements
have been recorded.
4. No grading shall occur in the floodplain and the floodplain shall be indicated on all plans.
3. Ski Club Vail - Conceptual review of a proposed redevelopment plan. Brent '
598 Vail Valley Drive / Part of Tract B, Vail Village 7th Fi(ing.
Applicant: Ski Club Vail, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 4. Buffehr Creek Park - Conceptual review of a proposed expansion of Buffehr Creek Park. Allison
1950 Chamonix/Lot 34, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
5. Vail P1aza Hotel - Preliminary recommendation to the Vail Town Council. George
100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N, & O, Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.-
Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson
MOTION: Melissa Greenauer SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0
"Upon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the
Board finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structures, the hotel's surroundings and
with Vail's environment. The Board further finds that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable
provisions of the Design Guidelines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code and the Vail Village
Master Plan & Urban Design Considerations. Therefore, the Board recommends approval of the
redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel. The Board's recommendation of approval carries with it the
following conditions: -
1. That the applicant submits a final landscape plan, final off-site improvements plan, and outdoor
lighting plan in accordance with the provisions prescribed in the Zoning Regulations for review and
approval of the Design Review Board.
2. That the applicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and
approval of the Design Review Board.
3. That the applicant submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
4. That the applicant submits a roof-top mechanical plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. All
roof-top mechanical equipment shall be enclosed and screened from public view.
Staff Approvals
Lipton - Retail remodel. Ann
192 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 160, Lodge Apt. Condos/Vail Village 1St Filing.
Applicant: Ronnie Lipton
Gramalegli - Deck extension. Ann
2600 Kinniclcinnick Rd.#J4, Meadow Creek Condominiums/Meadow Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Greg Gramalegli
Waterhouse residence - Stone pillar addition. Allison
285 Forest Rd./Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1 S`
Applicant: Steve and Linda Waterhouse
2
.
Town of Vaii Information Booths - Installation of customer service phones. Ann
395 S. Frontage Rd. (Lionshead)/Lot 1, block 2, Vail Lionshead 15t
241 S. Frontage Rd. (Vail Village)/Tract B&C, Vail Village 15t
Applicant: Town of Vail
Eversbush residence - Balcony enclosure. Ann
520 Lionshead Circle/Lot 5, Lionshead Filing 1.
Applicant: Ricardo Eversbush, Sr.
Webster residence - Minor subdivision (property line/right-of-way realignment). Brent
2755 SnowberryDrive/Lot 10, Block 9, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Chip Webster
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356,Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
3
NO.W THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, in accordance with
Section 183 ).4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Condominiums:
1. The Board of Directors of the Association is hereby authorized to grant an
easement for ingress and egress to Potential Purchaser upon satisfaction of all of the terms and
conditions therefor set forth in this Resolution.
2. The grant of the subject easement for ingress and egress (the "Easement")
shall be subject to the satisfaction of each and every one of the following conditions by Potential
Purchaser:
(a) Acquisition of the Carnie Property by Potential Purchaser;
(b) Final plat approval by the Town of Vail of the Plans and
Specifications for development of the Carnie Property (the "Development");
} (c) The Development shall contain no more than five (5) single family
residences and shall, not eYCeed 3,500 square feet GRFA, developed and built in
accordance with the site plan attached hereto;
(d) A 30 foot setback from the Association's easf property line shall be
. established in the Plans and Specifications and maintained by Potential Purchaser;
(e) The Easement shall not be more than 25 feet in width, and the
turning radius of the Easement within the Association property must be approved by the
Town of Vail Fire Department and the Association Board of Directors;
( fl The written evidence of the Easement must provide that all costs of
surveying, complying with Town of Vail planning requirements, all construction
(including road construction), landscaping and rounding of the entrance, as well as the
restoration of any Association property which is altered or damaged during construction,
shall be borne solely by Potential Purchaser;
(g) Potential Purchaser shall, upon execution of the formal
documentation of the Easement, pay to the Association the sum of $250,000, which shall
be allocated by the Association as condemnation award damages as specified in
Section 33.4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club Condominiums;
(h) The written documentation of the Easement shall contain, or
coincide with other documentation executed by the Association and Potential Purchaser,
a full settlement of the Carnie litigation with prejudice;
(i) The Easement shall not be granted until such time as Potential
Purchaser has obtained fee title to the Carnie Property;
(j) Upon issuance of and in conjunction with the execution of a letter
of intent to grant the Easement to Potential Purchaser by the Association, the Carnies
must agree and stipulate to a reasonable continuance and vacation of the tria] date and
417498 1 RGAI.I 08!2:99 =>7 PA1 2
JOINT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS
OF THE POTATO PATCH CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
WHEREAS, the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association, Inc. (hereinafter
referred to as the "Association") is currently a party to certain litigation iriitiated by John A.
Carnie and Joan T. Carnie (the "Carnies") requesting the condemnation of a certain easement over property owned by the Association in order to obtain access to a landlocked parcel of land
located adjacent to Association property and currently owned by the. Carnies (the "Carnie
Property").
~
WHEREAS, the Association has been advised that the Carnies may desire to sell
their property to MJL Development Inc. and/or Michael J. Lauterbach and/or their assigns or
affiliates,(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Potential Purchaser").
WHEREAS, initial -discussions have taken place between authorized
representatives of the Association and the Potential Purchaser concerning the purchase of the
Carnie Propei-ty and the possible grant of an access easement over Association property by the
Association to Potential Purchaser.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Association have reached a general
understanding with Potential Purchaser regarding the process by which Potential Purchaser could
obtain an access easement from the Association at an agreed upon location if Potential Purchaser
actually obtains title to the Carnie Property.
WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser obtains approval of the Town of Vail (and all
other governmental entities with jurisdiction over the subject property) for Potential Purchaser's
development plans and specifications (the "Plans and Specifications") with respect to the Carnie
Property, the prospects of a transfer of title to the Carnie Property to the Potential Purchaser are
greatly increased.
WHEREAS, in order to obtain approval of the Plans and Specifications for the
development of the Carnie Property, Potential Purchaser has advised the Association that
Potential Purchaser requires a letter of intent from the Association agreeing to grant to Potential
Purchaser an easement for ingress and egress over Association property to the Carnie Property at
the location specified in the Plans and Specifications. WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser is able to acquire the Carnie Property and
obtain from the Association the easement for ingress and egress more particularly described
herein, the litigation filed by the Carnies with respect thereto could be dismissed and the
Association could be released from the obligation to defend such action.
WHEREAS, on June 4, 1999 the Board of Directors of the Association adopted a
resolution (by a vote of six to two) recommendinc, that the Board of Directors bring to the
owners and members of the Association at the annual meeting; a resolution authoriziilg the
Association to pursue the matters more particularly described herein.
417499 1 RCiALT 08i1199^_ 57 PAI
Locati'on
a
~ 3t I I
TRACf A
BlDqC1 9U6 30 ~b
~ ~ nns VAIL POTATO PATC
~ 34
POiATO P
T67 TWYNHOAEB
- 33
766 6 -
~O ,7"
2 10
- ~7/
; 5 t' Ir7~ g-01
X/ m
- A
~ rnwcr o
T TO PATCH DR S
3
75B
hr~ F~c~,~~ AT ATC ,s+
•
L~ IL 2 7sa
a 7
i
S 73E - 748
POTATC~~1 rtj,
~
...ti • 740
7Y2 Z ,45
~gTAURANT ~ '!Y . .
a7 ~ 9 Buc ~
r Gi
9~ trorrAropnrcN
9PN097DNF CWBWNOOMIMUM
PMK RE08ANUeTONEEIEAENTARY
f (1
n1 i`
~ ~ ~ ;i`4HPN :E{?;~;j~;i;: 5et
AROOKTitEE LJ
8B0 L~ ae~~
TRACT C
a10
] AS N a+wse ci rHASE o Pi403E1
TR „s 'aa °65
e33 aa+ ~HASE
3 8Q6
UNPLATTFO l ~ B93 ~ 811N VNL
B97 ~ 891
1@0
osroNe ciR
TR1Cf ~ ~n g PYw~ V
p 8~ W B ' 880 . a r`
e~ 92' o ~ 7 " VAIL LIONSHEAD
817 N 998 ~
FILING 4
~ 97 0 LA sMosror€ ~
9 FILI G 9 TOTLOT
Ta"`T
W ea~ ""Rb"°`°T
ANDSTONE ~
70 ~ aeA +
134 878 RU VAI.GLO ~ .
Hi3 LANDMARK '
~ ~ 674 ~ L~ ~ ~ 7~
4CT 0 7ppC{ q i
'2 'm I 870
7 n 016
~ 9~ ~
N
Subject Property
E
S
.
u
~y
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road • • ,
Vail, Colorado 81657 ~
970-479-2100
.
FAX 970-479-2157 NOTICE OF APPLICATION
TM
The parcel shown on the map on the back side of this page, zoned Residential Cluster
(allows up to 6 dwelling units per acre), is currently under review for a proposed singie-
family residential development of 5 dwelling units. The project is currently scheduled for
review by the Design Review Board on August 18, 1999, ho.wever this date could
- , change. This notice is being provided to you as a courtesy as it is not required by the
Town Code.
` If you have any questions regarding the project or want to review the application you
may do so at the Community Development Department located at 75 S. Frontage Road,
Vail, CO 81657.
You may also contact the Project Planner for this application, Dominic Mauriello, at 970-
479-2148.
The Design Review Board agenda will be available on our website 24 hours prior to the.
meeting - vail.net/tov. RECYCLED PAPER
.
,
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL - MINUTES
TUESDAY, November 2, 1999
7:00 P.M.
The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held in the Town Council Chambers on -
Tuesday, November 2, 1999. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Rob Ford, Mayor Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro-Tem
Kevin Foley
Sybill Navas
Michael Jewett
Bob Armour
Mike Amett
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Tom Moofiead, Town Attomey
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Josef Staufer, past owner of Vail Village
Inn, expressed his appreciation to outgoing Mayor Rob Ford and the entire town Council for their
willingness to address some tough issues during their term in office.
The second item on the agenda was the consent agenda:
A. Approve the Minutes from the meetings of October 5`h and 1 gtn
1999.
B. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance to Designate
Five Properties in the Town of Vail as Open Space as per Section 13.11 of the
Town of Vail Charter (see Exhibit A).
C. Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1999, second reading of an Ordinance Authorizing
the Conveyance of Fee Title to the Following Land Owned by the Town of Vail and
Located on Rockledge Road, More Fully Described as Follows:
That portion of Lots 2, 3A and 36 (Resubdivision of Lot 3, Block 7), 4, 7, 8A, 9A, 10A
and10B (Resubdivision of Lot 10, Block 7), and 136 (Resubdivision of Lot 13, Block
7), Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, lying South of the North Line of Lot 2 of the
Raether Minor Subdivision (formerly Govemment Lot 3), and North of the North
boundary of Rockledge Road and/or North of the North boundary of Tract A East of
the East end of Rockledge Road, as described in the Final Plat of A Replat of a
Portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, and Lot 2 of Raether Minor Subdivision,
Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by
Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated September 7, 1999, (as that plat may be
modified with the consent of the Town of Vail), together with all interests of the Town
of Vail in all easements and other appurtenances associated with said Purchased
Property as shown on said Final Plat.
In addition, pursuant the Agreement Creating Restrictive Covenants, attached as
Exhibit B, the Town of Vail agrees to create restrictive covenants, which shall be
1 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999
.
u
covenants running with the land, for the benefit of the owners of Lots 2, 3A, 3B, 4,
7, 8A, 9A, 10A, 108 and 13B, which Restrictive Covenants shall be on the following
described real estate in the Town of Vail, County of Eagle and State of Colorado, to
wit:
Tract A, Final Plat of A Replat of a Portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, and Lot
2 of Raether Minor Subdivision, Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th
Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated
September 7, 1999, (as that plat may be modified with the consent of the Town of
Vail)
(See attached Exhibit A- Final Plat of A Replat of a Portion of Block 7, Vail Village First
. Filing, and Lot 2 of Raether Minor Subdivision, Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80
West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated
September 7, 1999.)
Council member Armour made a motion to approve the consent agenda, and Council member
Navas seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The third item on the agenda was second reading of Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1999, an
Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of Fee Title to the Following Land Owned by the Town of
Vail and Located on Ptarmigan Road and Vacating a Portion of Ptarmigan Road, More Fully
Described as Follows:
That portion of Lots 1-6, Block 5, Vail Village Seventh Filing, hereinafter refeRed to
as the "Original Lots", lying South of the North line of Govemment Lot 3, and North
of Ptarmigan Road, hereinafter referred to as the "Purchased Property", which
Purchased Property is combined with Lots 1-6, Block 5, Vail Village Seventh Filing
(according to the original plat), as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 2, as described in the
Final Plat of Replat of Lots 1-6 Block 5 of Vail Village Seventh Filing; Replat of Lot
4 Vail Village Tenth Filing, and Govemment Lot 3, situated in Sections 8 and 9,
Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-
Langford Corporation and dated September 1, 1999 (as that plat may be modified
with the consent of the Town of Vail); and
That'portion of Govemment Lot 3 which is situated on the east lot line of Lot 4, Vail
Village Tenth Filing, (which lot is hereinafter referred to as the "Original Lot 4'), and.
lying East of the West line of Govemment Lot 3, West of the East line of Govemment
Lot 4, and North of Comers 3 and 4 of Govemment Lot 3, containing 5,074.5 square
feet more or less, which portion is hereinafter referred to as the "Purchased Property-
1", which Original Lot 4 and Purchased Property-1 are combined as Lot 4, Block 1,
as described in the Final Plat of Replat of Lots 1-6 Block 5 of Vail Village Seventh
Filing; Replat of Lot 4 Vail Village Tenth Filing, and Govemment Lot 3, situated in
Sections 8 and 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal Meridian
prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation and dated September 1, 1999, (as that
plat may be modified with the consent of the Town of Vail). .
That portion of Ptarmigan Road, according to the plat of Vail Village Seventh Filing,
situated in the NW'/4 NW'/4 of Section 9, Township 5 South Range 80 West of the
Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Eagle, State of Colorado; being more particularly
described as follows:
2 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999
,
Beginning at the point on the North line of Govemment Lot 3 of said Section 9,
whence the B.L. M. Cadastral Survey brass cap for the South-North one-sixty fourth
comer on the West line of said Section 9 bears North 89°23'29" West, a distance of
65.46 feet; Thence North 00°36'31" East, a distance of 24.97 feet to the Northerly
right-of-way line of Ptarmigan Road, being on a 215.00 foot radius curve concave to
the northeast; Thence along said right-of-way line, 58.53 feet southeasteriy along the
arc of said curve, through a central angle of 15°35'49", with a chord bearing South
64°02'57" East, a distance of 58.35 feet to the North line of said Govemment Lot 3;
Thence North 89°23'29" West, a distance of 52.73 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 0.013 Acres, more or less.
In addition, the Town of Vail will establish and transfer to the Eagle Valley Land Trust
a conservation easement, on the terms and conditions set forth in the Deed of
Conservation Easement, attached as Exhibit B, which Conservation Easement shall
be on the following described real estate in the Town of Vail, County of Eagle, and
State of Colorado, to wit:
(1) Tract "A", a portion of Govemment Lot 3, Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80
West, 6th Principal Meridian, which contains 9,333 square feet; and
(2) Govemment Lot 4, Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 80 West, 6th Principal
Meridian which contains approximately 4.252 acres
(See attached Exhibit A- Final Plat of Replat of Lots 1-6 Block 5 of Vail
Village Seventh Filing; Replat of Lot 4 Vail Village Tenth Filing, and
Govemment Lot 3, situated in Sections 8 and 9, Township 5 South, Range
80 West, 6th Principal Meridian prepared by Thompson-Langford Corporation
and dated September 1, 1999.)
Councilmember Armour excused himself from voting on this item, stating that one of his ski school
clients was involved in the proposed purchase.
Tom Moorhead said in the early 1990s the Vail Town Council directed staff to begin working with the
Forest Service to address private and public encroachments on Forest System lands and to identify
ways to discourage private exchanges arQUnd the Town of Vail. In 1994 the community completed
the Vail Comprehensive Open Space Plan which identified properties that should be considered for
land exchange. In June, 1995, the Town of Vail and the United States Forest Service signed and
agreement to initiate a land exchange. The land exchange involved three parcels of Town of Vail
land totaling 76 acres and 11 parcels of United States Forest Service land totaling 62.2 acres. This
exchange essentially removed the Forest Service lands from within the Town of Vail by acquiring or
de-annexing U.S. Forest lands. The transfer of the property from the Town of Vail to the Forest
Service was approved in Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1997.
The Town has been negotiating in good faith with the residents on Ptarmigan Road to convey
land where residents now have encroachments and to create a buffer between Ptarmigan and
the forest on what was United States Forest Service lands and now are Town of Vail owned
lands. The value of this land has been calculated on a per square foot basis. The Town of Vail
will realize $1.2 million for the sale of property on Ptarmigan Road. It is hoped that it will reduce
the likelihood of private exchanges of Forest Service lands in and around the Town of Vail. The
Town continues to maintain a strong posture in regard to opposing private land exchanges that
could allow additional development around the Town of Vail.
3 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999
i
This ordinance has changed since first reading to include an additional 0.013 acres which is
presently included within the Ptarmigan Road right-of-way. It will be conveyed to the Cannans in
addition to other property from the LOAA and their participation in the land to be preserved as
open space. It provides a more standard shape to the lot. The conveyance will be for the same
price per square foot as they are paying for the balance of land being conveyed.
Council member Amett made a motion to approve on second reading, Ordinance No. 31, Series
of 1999, and Council member Kurz seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion
passed 5-1, Council member Foley opposing, Council member Armour abstaining. Council
member Foley stated he did not feel the Town was getting fair market value for this property.
The fourth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 15, Series of 1999, a Resolution Approving the
Town of Vail/Eagle County Intergovemmental Agreement to Develop a Sixteen Acre Affordable
Housing Project Located on the Berry Creek 5th property.
Tom Moorhead said a contract for Eagle County to purchase the Beny Creek 5th property from
the Eagle Gounty Recreation Authority is contingent upon entering into an Intergovemmental
Agreement for the development of the affordable housing component. The Intergovemmental
Agreement, which is subject to formal approval by passage of this resolution, provides that the
County and the Town will be 50/50 partners. The Town of Vail will be obliged to pay 50% of the
development costs and in retum will be an equal partner that is entitled to designate the rules for
the sale or rental of 50% of the units.
The County Commissioners have approved this Intergovemmental Agreement.
Russell Forrest, Nina Timm, and Tom Moorhead, on behalf of the Town, met with Jack Ingstad,
David Carter, and Jim Fritze, on behalf of Eagle County, and have taken the initial steps to move
_ forward with this project.
Michael Cacioppo questioned the wording in the last paragraph of the resolution. After some
discussion, Council member Amett made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 15, Series of 1999
and Council member Foley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously, 7-0.
The fifth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. Town Manager McLaurin
addressed the Council, stating that he was pleased to have worked with this Council and wished
them well. Council member Armour stated that this was his last meeting and thanked Bob
McLaurin, Pam Brandmeyer, Tom Moorhead, Russ Forrest and the Town staff, as well as his
fellow colleagues for their time and effort. He also thanked his wife, Mary Lou, for her patience.
As there was no further business, a motion was made by Council member Armour to adjoum the
meeting and Council member Amett seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously, 7-0.
4 Vail Tovm Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999
The meeting was adjoumed at 7:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, Ludwig Kurz
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson
Town Clerk
(minutes taken by Mary Caster)
5 Vail Tovm Council Meeting Minutes November 2, 1999
}
~
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL - MINUTES
TUESDAY, November 16, 1999
7:00 P.M.
. The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held in the Town Council Chambers on
Tuesday, November 16, 1999. The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-Tem
: Rod Slifer •
Chuck Ogilby
Kevin Foley
Greg Moffet
Diana Donovan
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Paul,Rondeau, a local resident, said he
had a couple of suggestions to make about the process of how things were done at Council
meetings. The first was to have informal seating at the Council work sessions and have people
seated at tables adjacent to the Council so people would not have to stand at the podium. The
second topic he wanted to address was that he wanted to get feedback from Council on his or
anyone other citizen's suggestions or complaints that are brought up at the Council meetings,
whether it's on the spot feedback or discussed at a later Council meeting.
Council member Greg Moffet said Paul's ideas were good ideas.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz said they are already in the process of changing some things and said
reiterated that Paul's ideas were good ones.
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager, said the staff already has tables ready to put in
place for this type of seating arrangement.
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager, informed everyone that public comments are placed on a
Council Follow-Up form for responses as well.
The second item on the agenda was a Wayfinding Conceptual and Design Review.
Suzanne Silverthorn, Community Relations Officer, gave a brief overview of the Wayfinding
Program and asked for further direction from Council. The wayfinding program builds upon the
sign program for vehicles and pedestrians that was developed 10 years ago at the time of the
1989 World Championships. The Council gave staff direction this past summer to work with a
consultant on an evaluation process. With input from the several entities involved, they have
come up with a Wayfinding Program for Vail. She introduced Jeff Corbin, President of Corbin
Design of Traverse City, Michigan.
1 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
~
Jeff Corbin gave a slide presentation to Council and the public. During the presentation he
discussed various aspects of the process. He stated that there were quite a few changes since
1989, information is easier to get and signage erosion has occurred. He said people weren't
necessarily looking for specific places within the town but were looking for larger sections of Vail
and how they relate to one another, such as Vail Village and Lionshead. The signage and
concepts in 1989 were sound and what they are proposing now, builds on what the town has
now.
Jeff said there were nine ideas to improve and build upon. The program would establish six
zones within Vail; East Vail, Golden Peak, Vail Village, Lionshead Village, Cascade Village and
West Vail, with a color coded mapping and sign identification system that would tie in the I-70
corridor, the frontage roads and roundabouts, pedestrian areas, recreation paths and
neighborhood streets. He said he has met with the Colorado Department of Transportation
(CDOT) regarding changing signage on I-70 to coordinate with signs in town. This would allow
for introduction of the symbols, signage and color by zones used in town on signage along I-70.
This program also extends the landscaping and stone walls approximately 150 feet off the exit
ramps, with additional signage. There could also be signs on the north side of the bridge
stating whether or not the parking structures are open and/or full.
There could also be the use of visitor parking signs to direct people to the parking structures.
He reviewed the parking structure signage, maps of the Village, as well as discussing possible
space on maps at the parking structures for events that are happening during the year. He said
the street signage needs updating and have more continuity throughout Vail, the need to have
signage with Spanish and German on them, as well as walking time in kilometers. Jeff said he
would answer any questions the Council may have about the Wayfinding Program. He
complimented the town on the Wayfinding Committee that Vail has in place.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz thanked Jeff for his overview.
Council member Sybill Navas thanked Jeff for the work he has done and said there is a strong
need for this program.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz asked about the I-70 signage. Would the entry into Vail from the East be
the same as coming into Vail from the West. He and asked why kilometers would be used
instead of miles.
Jeff said the entryways would be similar. He stated Vail could use miles, minutes, kilometers,
feet or whatever they thought was appropriate. He stated another community has used
kilometers and they have had success with it. Measurement in kilometers is shorter than miles.
The committee is open on what type of ineasurement to use.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz asked if they are looking at a phased program, and where is the best place
to start, from Jeffs experience.
Jeff said working on the pedestrian signage from the Village out would be the first priority, signs
in the roundabouts, and the parking structure signage as Phase I.
2 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
;
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager said the discussion on what would be Phase I is still in debate at
the committee level right now and the committee will come back to Council with a priority list.
He said this is a two to five year project.
Council member Greg Moffet asked if the funding would come out of the general fund.
Bob McLaurin said it would come out of capital projects funding.
Council member Rod Slifer complimented the committee and Jeff for their work. He said this
has been an ongoing issue for many years and said the first phase needs to include the
interstate signs and exit signs.
Bob McLaurin said the interstate signs are subject to CDOT approvals, which may take more
time to do.
JefF said everything that can be done first can be done during the winter, or immediately.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz asked if the signs can be made in the town shops instead of going
elsewhere.
Jeff said the town staff could do many of the signs, however, 320 signs are a lot for the staff to
manage.
Bob McLaurin said the technology available today would make the signs easier to make and to
maintain.
Council member Chuck Ogilby asked some of the colors that made it harder to read the signs.
Jeff said they would have to experiment to get the right color.
Council member Kevin Foley asked if they would be naming the paths and trails and if the signs
would be on light posts.
Jeff said yes that is what is being proposed, however the signs would not be on the light posts,
but they would have their own post.
Council member Kevin Foley asked if there was a cost to the businesses.
Bob McLaurin said they are looking at business opportunities with CDOT and Vail Resorts to
help fund this program.
Further discussion ensued regarding maps, costs to businesses, or if the town would pick up
the cost for the maps.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz echoed Rod's comments that this would help visitors get around town but
will also add freshness and color to the area. He said in terms of the cost of the program, it will
not be inexpensive to do but will help get guests around the town. He feels this is not an
inappropriate goal for the town to achieve.
. 3 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
Council member Diana asked if the signs are solar and will they reflect the light. A statement of
being in Vail should be made and the signs should be at both entrances of Vail. She is
concerned some of the signs looked large, particularly the transportation center sign. She said
the overall program was an interesting concept.
Jeff said the signs were not solar, they are solid and the same on both sides.
Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association (EVHOA) said he had
: worked on the.Town of Vail sign program years ago. He complimented the committee and the •
consultant on the comprehensiveness of the proposal. He would like to move forward on the
regulatory signs on the no- skier drop off signs immediately. He liked the idea of doing as much
of the signs in-house as possible. He feels that the French language should also be added to
the signs. Jim also stated that on regional news, CDOT is developing a system-wide camera
system so people can see the signs and get additional mileage on advertising. He thanked
Suzanne Silverthorn; Sybill Navas and the rest of the committee for letting him get his two-cents
in from the beginning of the process.
Paul Rondeau, a local resident said the West Vail area is a real problem. He stated there is
confusion of which side of the interstate people needed to be on.
Jeff said signage on the West Vail roundabouts would clarify what neighborhoods are on each
side of the highway and also the possibility of changing the Frontage Road name to a more
complimentary name on each side would help.
Paul said the blue color may be a problem and they may need to add a seventh color so the
blue in regulatory signs could stand-alone.
Council member Sybill Navas said the Design Review Board (DRB) also had a problem with
some of the color choices.
Jeff said there is a need to use colors that work with CDOT and signage.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz as Suzanne Silverthorn what authorization was needed from Council to
move forward.
Suzanne said they wanted authorization to allow staff to return in two weeks with an
implementation schedule for Phase I, and cost estimates.
Bob McLaurin said the 2000 capital budge provides $250,000 for the recommended
improvements. He also said he would seek community partners to help pay for the program.
He also stated the committee would come back in a couple of weeks with recommendations,
and what the federal and state government entities feedback.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz said there is strong support to keep moving forward with this process.
4 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
.
The third item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1999, an
Ordinance Providing for the Levy Assessment and Collection of Town Ad Valorem Property
Taxes Due for the 1999 Tax Year and Payable in the 1999 Fiscal Year.
Steve Thompson, Finance Director, stated this ordinance provides for the proposed mill levy
assessment and collection of property taxes for the 2000 fiscal year. The Town is allowed to
increase its property tax revenue by the sum of the percentage increase in net new construction
of .908% plus the Denver Boulder CPI for 1999 of 2.9% for a total of 3.808% or $76,519.
Council member Sybill Navas made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 33, Series of Series
1999 on first reading and Council member Kevin Foley seconded the motion. A vote was taken
and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The fourth item on the agenda were the Contracts for Community Facilities Planning.
Russell Forrest, Community Development Director, said a productive meeting was held with the
community facilities committee. They are requesting authorization from Council to enter into a
contract with Economic Research Associates for a market analysis on the various uses
proposed for the Hub site in Lionshead. He also asked for authorization to enter into a contract
with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop for site designing of the proposed community uses on
the lower bench of Donovan Park. He presented an overview of what the next steps would be
at the Hub Site.
Dominic Mauriello, Chief Planner, reviewed the Donovan Park project and the types of possible
uses for the site. He said there was a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued and they received
four proposals and interviewed three teams. He reiterated the request for authorization to
move forward with a contract with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop as the design
development team.
Russ said the market analysis needs to be updated from the early 1990's, and it is a critical
next step. He explained that the market analysis would reveal what the economic impacts and
operational costs would be and explain what would be viable. He said there were four or five
teams that responded but they coufd not respond fast enough. He stated Economic Research
Associates (ERA) is a leader in the business. He stated ERA is working with Eagle County and
they are on budget with Eagle County. He stated the next steps are to begin fund raising, finish .
the market analysis by February, and the design process completed by April or May.
Council member Diana Donovan said she has many concerns. She said at the last public
meeting she thought more uses were to be on the Hub Site and not on Donovan Park. She
said more of the uses should be moved onto the Hub Site. She said the gymnastics facilities
should be at the Hub Site and should not be in a neighborhood. She was also concerned about
the huge rush to get through this process quickly. She wants long-range thinking to keep
Donovan Park open space. She said the kind of density proposed would destroy the park.
Russ said communication between the two projects is essential and communication between
the two projects would provide for the ability to review the uses and move them from one site to
another. Parking and access to Donovan Park are issues. He reiterated there will be ongoing
communication befinreen the project sites.
5 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
,
Bob McLaurin said a site plan would be provided.
Russ said a couple of site plans would be provided. He said the design teams would be honest
and inform the Council and community of what the possible community facilities could be
handled at each of the sites.
Further discussion ensued.
Council member Rod Slifer said he served on the community facilities committee and disagrees
with Diana's comments. He said both sites need to be reviewed at the same time. He said not
all the facilities can be placed on the Hub Site. He stated the process Russ is proposing will -
address the concems that Diana has about the Donovan Park site and supported the move to
go ahead.
Council member Sybill Navas agreed with Rod. She said Donovan Park is being reviewed to
find out what could fit, and the architect is intemationally known for environmentally sound
decisions on what can be done various sites. She stated the Community Facilities team worked
hard on trying to find out what needed to go on the sites and there is room for debate on the
possible uses on both sites. There are community-driven uses that could be placed on
Donovan Park and there are separate Hub Site uses for economy-driven uses with guests. She
said the scale of uses in Donovan Park could be scaled down. There is not a clearly finished
project at Donovan Park or the Hub Site. She would like to see this financed through
partnerships with the Vail Recreation District, Real Estate Transfer Tax funds, and private
funding, without going to a bond election.
Council member Greg Moffet stated that as the only resident of the Donovan Park
neighborhood, he felt this area has been ignored. He said if basic services are being ignored,
families will leave town. He said the Council needs to get off the dime on this and move
forward.
Council member Kevin Foley said he agreed that Diana's concems were valid. He said beds,
food, and other activities need to be near the gymnastics facility. He doesn't want the ABC
School and Learning Tree School moved to Donovan Park with other facilities. He feels more
of the facilities should be at the Hub Site.
Council member Chuck Ogilby said the Mountain Bell site should be used for housing. He also
stated the swimming pool and gymnastics center and schools could possibly be placed on the
Mountain Bell site. He said the committee should also look at the hospital site for a swimming
pool. He said guests might have a difficult time accessing the Donovan Park site.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz said, in general terms, he agreed with Rod and Sybill's comments. He
stated the Council needs to get the professionals involved to find out what facilities can be
placed on Donovan Park and the Hub Site. He said to arbitrarily decide what is too much or too
little on the sites now is shorting ourselves because they don't have the expertise. He said it
was time to let the professionals do the market research, site planning and compatible use
evaluations and bring them to Council. He is in favor of moving forward with the design and
planning stage with the professionals.
, 6 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
Council member Sybill Navas said that before Council starts redesigning the entire community
facilities plan, they should consider all the work the team has worked on for three years with a
great deal of public input. She said there wifl still be opportunities to add to this program. She
said it would be a terrible mistake to have seven people make a decision like this without
community input.
Mayor Ludwig Kurz said Council should continue to move forward and get community input.
Council member Diana Donovan said she is not against the concept. She wants to make sure
: whatever doesn't work on Donovan Park doesn't get placed on Donovan Park. She said there were so many things on the list for ponovan Park that shouldn't be on the list. She stated
people on the community facilities team were special interest people and didn't represent the
community. She said not everything on the list for ponovan Park falls under the funding by
Real Estate Transfer Tax funds.
Russ said there will be an opportunity to review, in February, what Donovan Park can and
cannot support and everyone will have a better understanding of what the Hub Site can
support. Russ said the community didn't want to over-build the Hub Site with all the facilities.
He said there is a component in the contract for cross-communication and clear checkpoints to
evaluate the uses on both sites. The contract is in phases. The Hub Site is in the conceptual
phase only and Donovan Park is in the development review/design phase process.
Council member Kevin Foiey said he echoes Diana's comments, he isn't against the process,
he wants to make sure people are heard and get what they feel works on each site.
Council member Rod Slifer said to he is committed to work with each of the impacted
neighborhoods during the process.
Jim Lamont, representing EVHOA, said he credits this Council for concerns expressed about
the neighborhoods. He said the Counci{ and community needed to stay open to options that
are not available now. He said the train has left the station and it should keep going. He is
sympathetic to Greg Moffet's comments that this neighborhood has been neglected but Vail
Village and Lionshead feel neglected too. He said they should discuss improvement plans for
Vail Village and Lionshead and how can they can strategize various components to provide
funding for some of these projects at their retreat. He said these are complex issues and
challenges, and the how we pay for it is as critical as what facilities are placed on what site.
Council member Chuck Ogilby asked if it was possible to consider the swimming and
gymnastics centers separate from other components of the design.
Council member Sybill Navas said they might not be looking at just one building.
Diane Johnson, representing the Vail Recreation District (VRD) stated the hospital was a good
opportunity for a swimming pool and rehabilitation space. The VRD has all it departments
spread throughout Vail. She said they are the only recreation district that does it this way. She
said the reality is that the customer is better served if programs are clustered. She said
Donovan Park could provide parking that would be more convenient for users. The Lionshead
Parking Structure costs money. She said she is a community facilities committee member and
7 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
.
people on the committee are moving forward. She said they are providing honest and open
suggestians for facilities and nothing has. been preconceived.
Tom Steinberg, a local resident, said he is recommending ERA and felt they did an excellent
job.
Mayor Ludwig Ku2 asked Russ what specifically the staff was looking for from Council.
Russ said looking for approval to move forward on entering into a contract with Economic
Research Associates for a market analysis on the various uses proposed for the Hub site in
Lionshead and authorization to enter into a contract with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop
for site designing of the proposed community uses on the lower bench of Donovan Park.
Council member Greg Moffet made a motion to enter into two contacts; 1) a contract with
Economic Research Associates for a market analysis on the various uses proposed for the Hub
site in Lionshead and Z) a contract with Odell, Sasaki and Design Workshop for site designing
of the proposed community uses on the lower bench of Donovan Park, the motion was
seconded by Council member Sybill Navas.
Council member Diana Donovan asked if the motion could be split or if the contracts could be
reviewed by members of Council before they were signed.
Bob McLaurin said nothing can be signed off with out express approval and sign off of Council.
Further discussion ensued.
Council member Rod Slifer said he doesn't want to review the contracts.
Council member Kevin Foley wants to keep the cost inside the budget.
Council member Sybill Navas said the consultants are on a public process schedule that is tight
and she doesn't want to spend time to review the contracts because it would delay the time
frame of the projects.
A vote was taken. And the motion passed unanimousty 7-0.
The fifth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report.
Bob McLaurin said he had nothing further to report. He invited the Council to lunch with Sam
Mamet, from the Colorado Municipal League on Friday at Up the Creek.
Council member Kevin Foley reminded everyone there was unfinished business to discuss from
the work session. He said the discussion was whether or not the town should purchase a two
bedroom West Vail unit for employee housing.
Council member Kevin Foley made a motion to enter into a contract to purchase the Vail Das
Schone unit for $215,000 and Council member Sybill Navas seconded the motion. A vote was
taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
8 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
2
,
Ludwig said they had a productive work session. The Town Council will be the governing board
for the new marketing district at this time and there will also be a seven-member advisory board
at the present time.
As there was no further business, a motion was made by Council member Kevin Foley to
adjourn the meeting and Council member Rod Slifer seconded the motion. A vote was taken
and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ludwig Kurz
Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson
Town Clerk
9 Vail Town Council Minutes November 16, 1999
ORDINANCE NO. 34
SERIES OF 1999 AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET
ADNSTMENTS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS
FUND, AND HEALTH INSURANCE FUND OF THE 1999 BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL
PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES
OF SAID APPROPRIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN
REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 1999 which could not have
been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No.
17, Series of 1998, adopting the 1999 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado;
and,
WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not budgeted for previously; and,
WHEREAS, the Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are
available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget,
in accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and,
WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make
certain supplemental appropriations and budget adjustments as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF VAIL, COLORADO that:
1. Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town
Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations and budget adjustments for the
1999 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure of
said appropriations as follows:
FUND AMOUNT
, General Fund $ 63,461
Health Insurance Fund 120,000
Capital Projects Fund 85.000
Total $268,461
2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part,
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this. ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants
thereof.
4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty
imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced,
, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith
are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer sha11 not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL
ON FIRST READING this 7" day of December, 1999, and a public hearing shall be held on this
Ordinance on the 21 S` day of December, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
ATTEST:.
Lorelei Donaidson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this 21 S` day of December, 1999.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
Ci;brinance99.28 .
TOWN OF VAIL
SCHEDULE OF REQUIRED 1999 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS
AND REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
Fuial Supplemental Appropriadon
ADDTTIONAL REVENUE
FUND (REDUCED) ADJUSTMENTS EXPLANATION
DEPARTMENT 1999 INCREASE
EXPENDITURE OR PROJECT EXPENDITURES DECREASE
GENERAL FUND:
Revenues:
Grant Revenue 28,860 CDOT Pass through grant
Library Grant Revenue 3,831 Revenue from libtary grants
Miscellaneous Revenue 3,850 Revenue from friends of the library book sale
Miscellaneous Revenue 1,420 TIPS books sold to vendors
Grant Revenue 16,110 COPS more grant
Library:
Grant Expenditures 3,831 Expenditure of grant proceeds
Miscellaneous - Capital Outlay 3,850 Pass through ofbook sale to friends of the library
Police:
Capital Outlay - Hardware 17,500
Books and Subscriptions 1,420 Reimburseinent from vendor for TIP's books
Public Works:
Professional Fees 28,860 Reunbursement CDOT grant
Contributions
Vail Community TV 5,000 Franchise revenue was previously increased but expense was not.
We pay 40% of franchise fee to vail community TV
SUBTOTAL - GENERAL FUND 63,461 54,071
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND:
Revenues:
Sale of Fixed Assets 1,969,521 Sale of Berry Creek Sth parcel
Expenditures:
Library Work Area Remodel 4,000 Additional cost for project
Capital Outlay - Ice Arena 15,000 To cover fire damage to transformer at the ice arena
Software - Upgrade Permits Software 66,000 Present system is a DOS based system and will not work with new
operating system.
SUBTOTAL - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 85,000 1,969,521
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND:
Revenues:
Employer Contributions 120,000 Will use salary and benefit savings to fund increased clauns
Expenditures:
Health Claims 120,000 Health claims are expected to exceed budget
SUBTOTAL - HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 120,000 120,000
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 268,461 2,143,592
SUPPSUM.WK4 1 12/03/99
MEMORANDUM T0: , Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: December 7, 1999
SUBJECT: A rezoning for property zoned Natural Area Preservation and owned by the United
States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land
Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District, for
property located at Rockledge Road/ A replat of a portion of Block 7, Vail Village
First Filing and Lot 2 of Raether minor subdivision affecting lots 2, 4, 7, 8A and
9A, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing; Lots 3A and 3B, Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block
7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 10A, Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 Vail Village
First Filing; Lot 13B Resubdivision of Lot 13 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; and
Government Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the
Sixth Principal Meridian.
and ,
A rezoning for property zoned Natural Area Preservation and owned by the United
States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of Vail, pursuant to the Land
Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District, for
property located at Ptarmigan Road/ Lots 1 through 6, Block 5, Vail Village
Seventh Filing, replat of Lot 4, Vail Village Tenth Filing and Government Lot 3; all
in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Dominic Mauriello/Tom Moorhead
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST AND BACKGROUND
The Town of Vail is applying for zoning on property which was previously zoned Natural Area
Preservation located along Rockledge Road and Ptarmigan Road. This property was obtained by
the Town of Vail under the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement (LOAA) with the United
States Forest Service. The Forest Service did not recognize the Town's zoning on this property.
A portion of the land acquired is now proposed to be rezoned Primary/Secondary Residential in
order to accommodate those residential improvements already located on the land. The Town is
working with adjacent property owners under contract to purchase this land from the Town. The
PEC has already approved the plats~for this area, however, they have not be recorded. The plats
will be recorded at the time of closing the sale to the adjacent property owners.
On July 7, 1998 and again on. October 26, 1998 the Planning and Environmental Commission
1
- T'019NO*VAIL
recommended approval of proposed rezoning. The rezoning was not presented to the Town
Council at that time as the negotiations with adjacent property owners and potential purchaser.s
was continuing and agreements had not been reached. The PEC zoning recommendation
remains valid on the proposal.
II. ROLES OF REVIEWING BOARDS Planninq and Environmental Commission: .
ACTION: THE PEC IS ADVISORY TO THE TOWN COUNCIL ON THE ZONING.
The PEC shall review the proposal and make a recommendation to the Town Council on
the compatibility of the proposed zoning with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail
Comprehensive Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the community.
Town Council:
ACTIQN: THE TOWN COUNCIL IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL APPROVAL OR
DENIAL OF A ZONING REQUEST.
The Town Council shall review and approve the proposal based on the compatibility of
the proposed zoning with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail Comprehensive
Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the community.
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the zoning requests subject #o the following finding:
That the proposed zone districts are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are
consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate
for the area.
IV. BACKGROUfVD
This proposed resubdivision and zoning change is a one of the final steps in a Land Exchange
with the US Forest Service and the Town of Vail. The basic purpose of the exchange is to
remove Forest System lands from within the Town boundary and to acquire Forest System Lands
that have public or private improvements located thereon. One of the critical reasons why the
Forest Service was interested in the Exchange was to address private and public encroachments
on US Forest Service Lands. Lands owned by the Forest Service on Rockledge Road and
Ptarmigan Road were the major, issues of concern regarding encroachments.
In the early 90's, the Vail Town Council directed staff to begin working with the Forest Service to
address encroachments on Forest System lands and to identify ways to discouragelprivate
exchanges around the Town of Vail. On Rockledge Road residents requested that the Town
initiate an exchange to address encroachments on Forest System lands. Residents on
Ptarmigan were very interested in protecting a 4.25 acre parcel on the South Side of Ptarmigan ,
Rd. In 1994, the community completed the Vail Comprehensive Open Space Plan which
identified properties that should be considered for a land exchange. In June, 1995 the Town of-
Vail and the IJ.S. Forest Service signed an agreement to initiate a land exchange. The original
2
I
proposai for the land exchange involved 4 parcels of TOV land totaling 77 acres and 11 parcels
~ of USFS lands totaling 110 acres. The exchange removes Forest Service lands from within the
Town of Vail and involves a number of de-annexation actions to remove areas the Town of Vail
did not acquire.
In December of 1997, the Town and Forest Service exchanged titles to the involved parcels of
land and the Town now owns the lands identified in exhibits attached located on Rockledge and
Ptarmigan Rd. Throughout the land exchange the Town has worked with property owners on
~ Ptarmigan and Rockledge to develop a means for residents to acquire the land where they have
physical improvements on Forest Service lands. This subdivision is now occurring simultaneously
with the zoning application. Lands conveyed to private property owners will be deed restricted so
that development can not occur on any land the Town acquired from the Forest Service and such
restriction is noted on the plat as well. However, the zoning on the property that will be conveyed
to adjacent property owners needs to have the same zoning as the lot to take advantage of ,
additional GRFA and site coverage, This will involve zoning that land which will be conveyed to
adjacent property owners to the Primary/Secondary District. Tract A on both plats and the parcel
on the south side of Ptarmigan Road will, however, remain zoned to Natural Area Preservation
District since the intention with these parcels has always been to be maintained as open space. V. CRITERIA
The PEC shall make the following findings before granting approval of a zone change request:
1) Is the existing zoning suitable with the existing land use on the site and adjacent
land uses?
The purpose of this major subdivision and rezoning is to address private encroachments
on what is now Town of Vail property. The rezoning will be consistent with the zoning
directly adjacent to the exchange properties on Rockledge Road and Ptarmigan Road.
2) Is the amendment preventing a convenient workable relationship with land uses
. consistent with municipal objectives.
The amendment will facilitate legal access to both Rockledge and Ptarmigan roads.
~ Completing this exchange and conveying the encroached upon lands to the adjacent
property owners fulfills long stated objectives identified in the Land Ownership Adjustment
Agreement, the Land Use Plan, and the Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
3) Does the rezoning provide for the growth of an orderly viable community?
Addressing long standing private encroachments on public property helps to support a
viable orderly community by not having private residential structures exist without legal
access and clouded titles.
4) Is the change consistent with the Land Use Plan?
Section 1.9 of the Land Use Plan on page 7 states tliat National Forest land which is
exchanged sold or otherwise falls into private ownership should remain as open space
and not be zoned for private development. This reference refers to private exchanges.
The exchange between the Forest Service and the Town was a public exchange to
protect open space that may have been disposed off by the USFS. The 4.25 acres of
open space acquired from the Forest Service on the south side of Ptarmigan Road will be
3
protected by a conservation easement and zoning. The land conveyed to individual home
owners will also be deed restricted and will not allow development on lands acquired from
the Forest Service. This zoning request will facilitate the resolution of long standing
encroachments of private roads, structures, and iandscaping on public property. On page
10 of the Land Use Plan, it acknowledges that the Town and the USFS need to work
together to address lands that were identified for possible disposal. Lands on Ptarmigan
Road and_Rockledge Road were designated as such because of the privafe and public
encroachments on these properties. This subdivision and rezoning will help facilitate the
resolution of these encroachment"s.
F:\EVERYONE\COUNCI L\MEMOS\99\TOVREDI3.DOC
4
Viicnity Map
Rockledge ~Road Rezoning,
Wt,l MtAUUW UK
~ 252
p MOUDAY ~
\ 142
\ ~ 5 6 122 ~
B ~
100
\ 212 182 181 . f \ 62 13 > M
/
VAR Fl 44 aEPr 56
H
353 B
42 SONNEWLLF
~ ~
TRACT B
332 YILIA 15T ~
2 313 41 ~8 COHTIN4 ~ r
&1NK ~
~
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 37 18 A
. 333 Z76 ~ 153 173 ~
~ SAVARI
~ \ ) 20 F7S
fHpCTJ
2 ~
9 Z! 24
to ~8 Tr
xon ~-'`6 1 ~ 754 2e
~ 344 ~
3].4 274 64
31 25
22
29 ~ ~
1 ~ 21 z~s ~ ies 32
2 185 30
19
355 355 285 205 EAST FOREST ROAD tt5 gs
33 ~
12 a ~
11 8 8 G$
IS
TRACrA 17 17B ~ 129 1~ 168 8
3W 2~ 1~ 5
2 74C ~ 126 3
7 207
18 13 10 BA dA T 4 Z
30B 338 15 227 13 v 85 A7 ~d
188 nB 217 707 127 107 19
::<:`::':i;:.>:::.;:::::: .
PpRCELC
ROCKLEDG
Area to remain NAP
. N
Rezone to Primary/Secondary Residentia
.
Ma Not To Seale
¦ ¦ ¦
Vicin~ Map
aRoad Rezonings
~
Q 1184 „g, I nas v U a ~ HORNSILVERCR t4
,oo, 3 1 rnnore
1044
1022 U 713fi 73 1195
.
5 7 8 11 12 1187
~s- „o „ 6 „ST
1034 1081 1127 •
VP~-~E~ ~R
1014 4 4
v
992 1250
3
1240 ~
3 TRACT D ~
ssa
P/S a 1200
z Q'(
ino
i 996
1 Z 2 a a 5 S e z I
n ~ TRACT F
ggg 1017 1127 If~l 1 5119 11~ 1150
3
PARC,EL D
2 475 ~
985
FAIRWAY DR ~ -
- 4
99~ ,
7 6 5 Natura! Area Preservation District
930 950 970 (existing zoning)
Pis N
Map Not To Scale
Legend
~ Primary/Secondary Two-Famsly Residential District Zoning (P/S)
I
ORDINANCE NO. 35
Series of 1999
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL IN
ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 5, ZONING MAP;
APPLYING ZONE DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS TO PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY THE
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE TOWN OF VAIL
PURSUANT TO THE LAND OWNERSHIP ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT TO
PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
ROCKLEDGE ROAD/PORTIONS OF UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE LOT 3, TOTALING
1.78 ACRES BASED UPON THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT (NOT YET RECORDED) OF A
REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK 7 VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING, AND LOT 2 OF
RAETHER MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED BY DENNIS SHELHORN AS JOB NO. 0332-002;
AND APPLYING ZONE DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS TO PROPERTY PREVIOUSLY OWNED
BY THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE TOWN OF VAIL
PURSUANT TO THE LAND OWNERSHIP ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT TO PRIMARY /
SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT PTARMIGAN ROAD
/GOVERNMENT LOT 2(1.66 ACRES) AND LOT 3(4.252 ACRES) CREATED BY A SURVEY
DONE IN 1995 UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE BUREAU OF LAND IIAANAGEMENT
CADASTRAL SURVEY.
WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to implement the Land Ownership Adjustment
Agreement with the United States Forest Service by zoning property acquired by the Town of Vail
from the United States Forest Service ; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that these zone designations are compatible with and
suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations,
and are appropriate for the area; and
, WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has
recommended approval of these zoning map amendments at its October 26, 1998 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and
welfare to amend the official Town of Vail Zoning Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDP;INED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Ordinance No. 35 , Series of 1999 1
Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail is hereby amended as foliows:
From property owned by the United States Forest Service (zoned Natural Area
Preservation) and transferred to the Town of Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment
Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential District, for property located at Rockledge Road
according to an unrecorded replat of a portion of Block 7, Vail Village First Filing and Lot 2 of
Raether minor subdivision affecting lots 2, 4, 7, 8A and 9A, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing; Lots
3A and 36, Resubdivision of Lot 3 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lots 10A and 10B, Resubdivision of Lot 10 Block 7 Vail Village First Filing; Lot 13B Resubdivision of Lot 13 Block 7
Vail Village First Filing; and Government Lot 3, all in Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80
West of the Sixth Principal Meridian (see attachment A, an unrecorded plat).
Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail is hereby amended as follows:
From properry owned by the United States Forest Service and transferred to the Town of
Vail pursuant to the Land Ownership Adjustment Agreement to Primary/Secondary Residential
District, for property located at Ptarmigan Road according to an unrecorded replat of Lots 1
through 6, Black 5, Vail Village Seventh Filing, replat of Lot 4, Vail Village Tenth Filing and
Government l_ot 3; all in Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal
. Meridian (see attachment B, an unrecorded plat).
Section 3. If any part, section, subsection; sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the.
remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have
passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof,
regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
Section 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
Sectinn 5. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in
this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that
occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or
proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any
provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or
superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall
not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore
repealed.
Ordinance No. 35 , Series of 1999 , 2
1
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 7th day of December, 1999, and a public
hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 21 st day of December, 1999 in the
Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
Attest:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this
21 st day of December, 1999.
' Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ,
Attest:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
Ordinance No. 35 , Series of 1999 3
~PUr aF ~
A RF,PLAT OF APUHTIQIY QF BLOGK 7 YAIL VILI.AGE FIR9T FILING, AND IJC)T 2 ClF .RAETHER MI1WO13 SU13DINISI()P±1---
SFCI'l[OI'd'1, TOWP?1SIHIP 5 ~OUTH, RANGE 80WEBT, 54.h PRINCrP4.I.MIEPdIDTANi
~ .
~
.s acwur ~°~'iw NeCao•(~G - - ~ _ ~ ~
[9 Pm as i4@ 'F ff e`~hI r~ ~~.BS"`~~ T 3 ~En=. a
8 /.a~.
IIt ~fJ.,~l lll.l! ~A 1 ;!1Nia~.;fi 1 d ~!%i~"~I I.il:.~l.- ~~:II..II ill.i:li:`l~ ~ ..1. ^ . ~ ` k r~~
, uta~roo•c 14DT1aA W7'f66 ~ IOffM tl ~.yu L(/TQA CtYPA
. ~ le.sr ~ ~ ' . ; 7/Y,r: ~s ~ .[~il'1 ' ~ w
N -BAO' $ 79 - f~HNIJ ~
~mauvrv~ '
~,c
,
nj
,
.
U~ v,~ ' . ~asx sa ' .
~e~a. r . ~
~•.r•e ~ -~~es_ . .`E9a6"_`n~ vrurorrec.~•
( Y
{ apB? ~ 9 . .
BC00 • i9.69 ! R• uo I• ~ ~
novoo•ii a f ~n. a .r.,
• _ _ ! 2' . -~e+] .~.v
0.04' ~y - . . ' ~ . . . ~
'•O>~` '..:..~~~E. E aU OYEILEP ELIPCE « :-YGR ^ 3E . . . ~.'j .
A'/ w 1T~. v. . . . . . iv a ~n n _ _ . . , • r Y e i i M. • C ,4 7~$S.~DY /v. IO -""•~~.d
W~9SG~U9ftQd tyA7111~ L~DI~lI ~~i nii1 n iu.i~u e r u
111Mcra a..~a~,~. ~PSIR961d~FLA7IA~FYAIL&'QDI19ltl~7P
IAI' 9UMNARY TAHLi;
, r~ r?~r 1 secor~d,a~r o.~E~ ~ Nq'~~
,.K-' - :L ~~t(tol Prew a
`g'-' ivev `a. iil P~~,.1M~~pY%E[p im W'17~"xiu U
1 • LOT L t8n iy. l. P111M1N /BECONDIPf IPB~ PE810~__
tat ~e ffee~ aa~. i1: ~~~o 1v n~1io~hT I~~
v\ o~ aien ~FaAAJ1ENT LiM1EICURVl7 TAOIL
fp~Lt ~p~) e (yi IRYL A F Af O16~P]C~
IJflE TABIE POCxtE~GE POIO I920a an. ie. PP
ply,lt P P[4n - Wy n~ono awane MC IU91U9 OGS~ "(]IIfFp
uac ~axac orernnca. _ - - e~. i viu r~u•Ge ~~ns .iuxc-~ ~j;:1 . I9?7~S
pR' mGP4PM!! £ChIE . -cp~ mss '
sa .e ram m...~.. rnaa~taa ..i rser~aiv. ~ru,w mrz ..w ~rau oi.c.
0 50 ' !DO !50 ` ~Aeq1 ~t'si~~~~i~q PD' Mfixn [1 treic Eow+4' ic ~m~n~ u~ Ow1htl b+ w~g•p~~
BWS [T BFM11~0. RIrE?k1R: i~v Mrl'4 ~Irn tr ba0 m~ brf~9 ~n u' EA' ft Pop! . Lmllu~~ 19YLaVMH ~ 11! 6 Y+~Y af ~1FV vtl ~m.n ~~mC },I'
pr.lp9•~1EOx xtWlrp to Ve ple! M nil 11114 ilret rlll1q Oelwn BLY. UwV~n
N N 1~ Xf/ W mwm [p S~Rlwa l er'O B a~f !n 4N 1/RI el lxtlm ] ~R 31 l~iap/~'op 0 Ikillty OvlrmK attNln3 ~la'IY /N~ Ue PfW]CfA PsE
w•ena e sun ~am m wn~. • u~ ~1Tt'vfyry !f IQ L bMlt O! Ip[s 2 3~'R t s'~E Re )mRlm o~ fil!
' 4o~ S<' wcirt eitr+elnnl ~IVn ofRl.~ w. Sw qp][etq~ v~ AYeI i. iiu rlpN •
a 91M. KL4U~M/6Mf8 W iXtl ull~ tti aq~lC;m Y WI1lY ~ti ^W b M{mdr~l~ eY s
' 0 itll0 9PYEY MNNEP ~9 IdfEO ' tleels~llm rmYltl mrL ttv+ Nla >bt.
• ~t s5 ~N /KIN]NM fM ' 11 Trot Wrl)~ ol lot SL 1W9 ~~W A~ l:m vl lot 2 0l pqVq~ NYO- U.
flf~F M6W rM' 0.8 fY'R.. ry lm mM ta ~ m3rR>am~ ~e~w+nt ~n1~T Ic ttt~y VhntW tn tt~ ~ow. aI bll.
zl aorrlwW rom n9H-orrr •.a a~r~+uw ~ry rrver n~ xm nlst„v w.•1a raeo.p. '
md f~velss id !n r10N.
Cl(AYE TAB1E a~r~a~~~ea ni ~ q wn,mce' ~ram~ rmr" i~n i il rio.n~~ r<aA•ivara~.a
cvnve nac n.~mue o n aiaxe r xc c
e.~e NkiN~a iry m~en lm.. m;a s~an.a cun nroln w.~..
~ - 'e•.em~ m f ~iro i~ rmt ~nuie~ ~.anM~rv em r.ro m..,, i~ i~eo ..a ~ ~r m~, i MPP? AT OT' A~ Pt)T277L1`I U~' 1j.~.nCK i
t) YI)l~y f Irat t1] rq b IpW~ rKatoO 1n ~p{ q wyl~av rocrOU Ir fnltn.
VAiL VILLAGL~ rll~S:f F'ILIiJG
' ~n L(.`9' 2 rt~v;7~iErt MINOTt SUBDIVISI(11
1O : u,:. ~vtwiu ar ua t tm~m ~a ~sav m~tn o~iru runn nre cr in e w w.enr Sk~C. 7, 'P. 5 S.. R. (3U W. fih P.M.
Mirtr 8f~. 1l9~ICror.e vf eW lry Irvo+warR~ m te
ro1d tmrolv :Ml pcr.lttrtl.
` .u~ ~ g .a a+c~co.mt rigen nen tr wanm M w ro.~ er veii emf uxn t~rte> >or. rc.v W~
~ ILKtvtlLy la;J W;6Yy ~KY'1. 1ua. ~ y
- m +rs~ A i1 nnUm m I rretr¢t~« m.~e,~ um~ouev ariei~ wrc m Rr. anv sFCINui neui SJ ~1iMSef!0 9 . Bn Iimt IEpfNNt filM
. en raen 1n e eerdreUa~ ra.a+wl t .r~ lnla olel. 1110N_ (MBAIIoN
I~LKa Y. ]fl M4 W fID va v+t~ve W tw-rsllv 1Mn. ~~o raJ1Y 1~[c re ¢n10rM
Gzs 25 1/2 HOAC 9-210
b*~~ ~ ~,~,~~'^„y~ ~~'d,~ „r . ~:~m ra~n~ v.ti~v reemra' ian~r~ee m iot a ie e~~e~r ~m tm ee+eni o• Gf 9ntl Jun[t ion CO B]505 1970) 243-6067
ewn:5~ ~o'...n ~n.~n'1i a~u n~~. s~ .d st i• ers~v.tu .ien un.+.n. ca.o,~HV ~~~n smrvm
rm Wt fsvL 9m~ 9 ar
.
,
~ M r •
- - _a~a.s~~~...._~.~
FlNAL FI.AT OF~ r~
' gtEFI.AT OF L€)"1t"S 1-6 BLS$CK 5OF VAIT, VII.I.At~~ SMTIti"Tll F'ILING,
~ ItEFLA.'T OF 1f.,.,UZ' 4 OF VAIIG VdiIUrE TEN'I'H FILING, .AiWD ~OVERNMEN7C L(17l' 3. ~
, .
~ .
,
i.~~l,'r.:F:..m . i ~.'~.'.i~- ,:~<~:~~;".S
...!r -
i
. ~j------tv~^•-- eevca~ c,ea~.u• .
I ~A 16C00'
e ~+'ae cc
"t'D . r/ ~uv~rer.
LOi'f a C07'9 e L07'J LD7"4
race ~`+mnav"a°r'~i~ °vxsu~,y(' Pr~Mrl~~ f ~irW~rK
ltYten v~ 0~ J1~ ii"A'se'u / 4c=66G3' ~ ~
~--~yT~~•- . ~ v.ti' eeo ;YE
K:r~ - ~ .~s-x- ~~.:;~.:.:r~~,,~.: . w. .I
~ ~mdE.Ye' • ~6'F 1-~ E__- M_ _ ~ ~ ~O`~~~ ~
• Y p fM]t 1' ti M •e ` ' Pi o
qRJCI' a~-_~,._.__: rnacr a $ g •
. $ m•, ~ • - i+w~2a~ ~v axam •o+. - .rw . r+v. ~ , .
i
?ti GC ~
~
i
. , . r.~a• ~ ~j;.~;:l~l' ..i.l",t Q6
• . , a :
% e
~,,K+
N aJwnxtAyect pmserv4~+~ 0A
Cso,Mfnrq a.+Lef y a~dTr~cfiA~ ,
.<T, F=o^rA!S ~
~
` 0iR l l01' 3, • (i~' i lor J _ _ _ _ _ _ " _ _ _ _ _ I ~I[A e fd
~N 9~'OCR
Y 0 109b :.0
~ 8~91 6~IAI!G9 91P~EIEM: 11R I~al~ atGFl Mq~ pN1 oi a D"1er
1
:URYe S•°,]L ~~P9z, Mr.mi B1~Y.~`~ ¢Y mvrs^_a !~er 2 m! Cr'n.
CV RC A01 9 plLrTA CHO1Tp 9'W0}~6 OflD Ih~ u, u. ~ v F.QO m fASI.
Pr-i ece . --6-~
~t d - - - a~~, a~~s'v3~' ~a,x, 1,~~ RIta191N. NWINN/aa1M19 Ua
5i IAT 3U M TABIY z~-ii' Y.'ro'
~ w. e~'ar~ rtu.? ~1Pf.i IY~C ~"1 ;vrP
\ t P4+LEL MEP L~xG 116E N. I 9~,n' - ' • • FF~ ~L IFSN
~Y W
~ p, 1 apq f PB156 ac. 1t. Pp114PY/9ELOt[IMY 1L C) eC.'0' 9i0. ' ~'G y'fY'F rosmttutitia rt6 IW]B'
a Em g e~oo~ i v.e. ~w.wri~cuo.ur {~i
2110
p~ 9~,oa~ a ~ppyp . ~}wnrioECUamr as~p~xr , . . ~ u.
l~i P B~IX% i YOCJO sa. Il. PP.~!N~I/9F4 WY (EB [EM1~l ~
pp rr c in .
~ ~oi ~ °sa: : ry~~~'+ ~ In(~
1 ni I m ein r e ~a ft RI;I'1 A7'Ui~ L(11'A> 1-6 F3I,UC
r~~~~~~,s~a~=, I~ 5
` ~;9w~ ~ ~ .a. , t. » ~ ,)F' VAIL VII.~LAGE SI~,VFN7H 1~'IL[NG,
]]GB4 6e. 11 ` o p~ vIlL v]LI~GH ~BrtN~iL aG
m ~ ~9"~'"b ~
I 4pt
OME) ev. 1t. 9L~ ! VAIL VILL.1ff SFVfl1,X Fxl]NG ~pqyR ~~~y pVt b mWat Yv ll'~ Zdn n~ h5t ~w< wn tMfl ]o! v+a
, ~ Las~ ~a. crr.~enoczp~ tti ] .~uwara uinun~are ~eunna,.. LO'J, 4 nF W~~ ~~111AGE TFNrI-{
Aa,.~;:,~~^~°°^•.^R°°m~°~•a,°°,"• FILING, AND GOVI,RNM.EN1' 1..Of J.
w,
r~o e , TOWN UF VAll.,
.a l
41'11M1M1 ~ MY ~99 er.a son mia.t r[aorae scn
1410MP80N-LAN R[1 MAPORAIYUN
529 25 .12 RpAD - i' 8-?10
Grand Junction CO B7505 19701 243-6067
vie, os
~,.ee ~ {~".i0.~°'~?7. w~n"..W` : : oe,~o<a g: me c,m~.e : ksr .m ro. vse~oz
.._.~.....e.....,~.,~.. . ~p s~o,,. wrs w~s~w.,. a~w• m,~ ae i am 2 e
ll
TOWN OF VAIL -
Department of Cammunity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town of Vail Town Council
FROM: Gary Goodell, Chief Building Official ,
Building Safety & lnspection Services Team,
Community Development Department
DATE: December 2, 1999
RE: 1 st Reading, Ordinance No. 36, series of 1999, Amendments to Title 10, Chapter
1, the Town of Vail Building Code, for December 8, 1999 evening meeting
The Town updated its adoption of model codes to the most current editions, with the exception of
the electrical code, with Ordinance 98-19, which became effective January 1, 1999. The 1999
edition of the National Electrical Code (NEC) is now available and is proposed for adoption
effective January 1, 2000. This update and other proposed bui(ding codes amendments were
also discussed during the Council's afternoon work session on November 23, 1999.
The proposed amendments are summarized as follows: '
• 1999 NEC Update. Update from the 1996 edition to the most current 1999 edition of the
National Electrical Code (NEC), retaining some minor amendments that have been in place
for many years. One of the existing amendments is being modified to reflect the current list
of occupancy types found in the published 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC).
• Residential "C.O.s." Modify the exception in the published Uniform Building Code (UBC) to
require Certificates of Occupancy ("C.O.s") for newty constructed one- and two-famiiy
dwellings and private garages, but not to require C.O.s for remodels and additions to existing
dwellings. This simply reflects current practice within the Town.
• Semantic and editoriai changes. Several minor changes are proposed for clarification or
editorial reasons. Like the rest of the proposed amendments, proposed deletions are shown
struck through and new additions are underlined.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town Council APPROVE proposed Ordinance
36, series of 1999, on first reading.
GRG:grg
attachment: Proposed Ordinance #36, Series of 1999
RECYCLEDPAPER
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 365
SERIES OF 1999
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 1; ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE 1998 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1997
EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, THE UNIFORM
CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL
, CODE, AND THE lNTERNAT)ONAL PLUMBING CODE; THE 49961999 EDITION OF THE
NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE; THE 1995 EDITION OF THE MODEL ENERGY CODE, AND
THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, AND, WITH REGARD TO THE
ABOVE-DESCRIBED CODES, ADOPTING CERTAIN APPENDICES, SETTING FORTH
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD
. THERETO. .
WHEREAS, the 1998 edition of the International Mechanical Code (IMC), the 1997 editions
of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), the Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) and the International
Plumbing Code (IPC); the 4-Ng 1999 edition of the National Electric Code (NEC), the 1995 edition
of the Model Energy Code (MEC), and the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) have
been published; and
WHEREAS, the Town wishes to adopt these codes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN'OF VAIL,
COLORADO THAT:
1) Article 10, Chapter 1 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby repealed and
reenacted to read as follows:
CHAPTERI
BUILDING CODES -
SECTION:
10-1-1: Preamble 10-1-2: Codes Adopted By Reference
10-1 -3: Amendments To Uniform Building Code
10-1-4: Amendments To Uniform Fire Code
10-1-5: Amendments To International Mechanical Code 10-1-6: Amendments To National Electrical Code
10-1-7: Copies of Codes Available
10-1-8: Penalties
10-1-1: PREAMBLE:
The Charter of the Town of Vail and the statutes of the state of Colorado provide that
standard codes may be adopted by reference with amendments; and the Town of Vail wishes
to adopt the 1997 editions of the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform Mechanical Code, the
Uniform Fire Code, the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings and the
International Plumbing Code; the 1998 edition of the International Mechanical Code, the 1995
edition of the Model Energy Code, the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, and the
-#Q" 1999 edition of the National Electric Code.
NOTE: Itefns t1Tat are dashed thyotigh {4asheb~;!hi:eugh4 are existing ajiietidments that are proposed to be
cleleted. Items that are underlined (un(lerlined) are proposed iaew material. Items that ar-e neither dczshed
throacgh nor underlined are pf-oposed to remain as is.
-2-
10-1-2: CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE:
A. Building Code: The Uniform Building Code, 1997 edition, Volumes 1, 2 and 3, including
Appendix. Chapters 3, Division II; 11, 12, Division II; 13, 15, 30, 31, Division II; 33, and 34,
Divisions I and II; is hereby adopted by reference. The Uniform Building Code, 1997 is
published by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 Workman Mill Road,
, Whittier, California 90601-2298. .
B. Fire Code: The Uniform Fire Code, 1997'edition, Volumes 1 and 2, and all appendix
chapters thereto, is hereby adopted by reference. The Uniform Fire Code, 1997 edition, is
published by the International Fire Code Institute, 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier,
California 90601-2298.
C. Mechanical Code: The International Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, including Appendix
A, is hereby adopted by reference. The International Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, is
published by the International Code Council, 5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 708, Falls Church,
Virginia 22041-3401. The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1997 edition, and all appendixchapters
thereto, are hereby adopted by reference as an acceptable alternative to the International
Mechanical Code, 1998 edition. The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1997 edition, is published
by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier,
California 90601-2298.
D. Plumbing Code: The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition, Chapters 2-12; Chapter 14;
Appendices A-J, and Installation Standards 1-13, 16, 18, 20 and 21; is hereby adopted by
reference. The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition, is published by the International
Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 20001 Walnut Drive South, Walnut,
Ca4ifornia, 91789-2825. The International Plumbing Code, 1997 edition, - including
Appendices B-F, is hereby adopted by reference as an acceptable alternative to the Uniform
Plumbing Code, 1994 edition. The International Plumbing Code, 1997 edition, is published
by the International Code Council, 5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 708, Falls Church, Virginia
22041-3401.
E. Abatement Of Dangerous Buildings Code: The Uniform Code for the Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, is hereby adopted by reference. The Uniform Code for
the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, is published by the International
Conference of Building Officials, 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601-2298.
F. The National Electrical Code, 1996 edition, and all appendix chapters thereto, are hereby
NOTE: Items that ar-e dashed througli 64ashed tlf-eug#~ are existing amerzdrnenls tlaat are pi•oposed to be
deleted. Iten2s tlaat nYe tcnderlined (underlined are proposed new material. Iterns tliat. are neitlaer dashed
tltr•ough nor ufzderliiTed are pf-oposed to r•emain as is.
I '
-3-
adopted by reference. The National Electric Code, 1996 edition, is pubiished by the National
Fire Protection Association, Batterymarch Park, Quincy, Massachusetts 02269.
G. Energy Code: The Model Energy Code, 1995 edition, is hereby adopted by reference
through adoption of Appendix Chapter 13 of the Uniform Building Code, 1997 edition, as
noted above. The Model Energy Code is published, by the Council of American Building
Officials, 5203 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041.
10-1-3: AMENDMENTS TO UNIFORM BUILDING CODE:
The following amendments are hereby made to the Uniform Building Cade, 1997 edition:
Chapter A34, Section A3406.2 of the appendix of the Uniform Building Code, 1997 edition,
is hereby amended to read as follows:
A3406.2 Effective Date. Within eighteen (18) months after notification by a building official
of the Town of Vail, the plans for compliance shall be submitted and approved, and within
eighteen (18) months thereafter the work shall be completed or the building shall be vacated
until made to conform.
Sections 107.2 and 107.3 are hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
107.2 Valuation. The valuation for a building permit shall be based on the average cost
figures per square foot shown in the building valuation data chart published bimonthly in the
Building Standards Magazine of the International Conference of Building Officials, a copy of
which shall be on file in the Department of Community Development of the Town with the
following modifiers, or on the actual cost of construction, whichever is greater.
CONSTRUCTION ZONES
Modifiers
Zone & Title $ Per Sa. Ft. Identification
ZONE #1
1. Matterhorn 1.0 Matterhorn Village, Vail Village West 1 st & 2nd, Donovan Pk.,
West Vail exit to Coldstream south of freeway.
1. Intermountain 1.0 From West Vail exit west on south side of freeway.
1. West Vail 1.0 Vail Ridge, Vail Das Schone 1 st, 2nd, & 3rd, Vail Fieights,
Buffer Creek Rd. west on north side of freeway.
ZONE #2
2. East Vail 1.2 ` East of East Vail exit. Includes all Bighorn Subs., Pitkin Creek Meadows, Gore Creek Sub., and Vail Meadows.
2. The Valley 1.2 Lions Ridge 3rd & upper sections of upper sections of Lions
Ridge 4th, Casolar, The Valley, Cliffside.
NOTE: Items that are da.shed throtsgh (dashed h~ are existing amendments that are proposed to be
deleted. Items that at-e zcnderlined (zcnder•lined ar•e proposed new matei-ial. Items that ar•e neither• dashed
thraugh nor undeYlinecl are proposed to f-emain a:s is.
-4-
2. Lions Ridge 1.2 Part of Lions Ridge 1 st and 2nd East Buffer Cr. Rd. to Vail
View. 2. Sandstone 1.2 East of Vail View Dr., ABC School Dr., including Vail Run.
ZONE #3
3. Potato Patch 1.7 From Potato Patch Club north.
3. Booth Creek 1.7 Vail Village I 1 th, 12th, & 13th, Vail Mtn. School, Booth Creek
area both north & south of freeway.
3. Golf Course 1.7 Vail Valley 1st, 3rd & 4th, Vail Village 7th, 8th, & 9th,
Northwoods and Pinos del Norte.
3. Village Area 1.7 Vail Village 1st, 4th, & 5th. East of Vail Road to Gold Park.
3. Glen L.yon 1.7 Glen Lyon Sub. & Cascade Village up S. Frontage Road to V.A.
Maint. Shop.
3. Lionshead 1.7 Vail Village 2nd, Vail Lionshead 1st, 3rd, 4th & part of 2nd.
Lionshead parking structure to West Day lot.
ZONE #4
4. West Meadow 2.6 Vail Village 3rd & 6th. Part of Vail Beaver Dam Area Lionshead
2nd, TOV Offices to residences adjacent to Vail Mountain.
4. Spraddle Creek 2.6 North of Freeway to new subdivision.
107.3 Construction Fee Schedule. The construction fee schedule for the Town of Vail shall be
maintained in the Building Safety & Inspection Services office ID'vis+ea af the Community
Development Department.
Section 109.1, Use and Occupancy, is hereby amended to read as follows:
SECTION 109 - CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
109.1 Use and Occupancy. No building or structure shall be used or occupied, and no
change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof
shall be made until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy therefor as
provided herein. EXCEPTION: Additions, alterations or repairs to existing Group R, Division 3 and
Group U Occupancies.
Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation
of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid.
Appendix Chapter 12, Division II, Section A1208.1, first paragraph, is hereby amended to
read as follows:
NOTE: Items that are daslzed through. *shed tkr-eng* are existing anleridriients that arepr-oposed to be
deleted. Items that af-e uriderlined (under•lined) areproposed new niaterial. Items that are rteither dashed
tlzr-ough nor underlined ay-e proposed to remain as is.
-5-
A1208.1 General. In Group R occupancies, wall and floor-ceiling assemblies separating
dweiling units or guest rooms from A-1, A-2, A-2.1, and A-3 from each other and from public
space such as interior corridors and service areas shall provide airborne sound insulation for
walls and both airborne and impact sound insulation for floor - ceiling assemblies. (Ord.
15(1993) 2, 3, 5: Ord. 25(1991) § 1)
10-1-4: AMENDMENTS TO UNIFORM FIRE CODE: The following amendments are made
to the Uniform Fire Code, 1997 edition:
Section 103.2.1.2 is hereby amended by replacing the words "police officer" with the words
"peace officer" per CRS 18-1-901, 3(I)(III), Peace Officer, Level II, to read as follows:.
103.2.1.2 Fire prevention bureau personnel and police. The Chief and members of the fire
prevention bureau shall have the powers of a peace officer in performing their duties under
this code.
Section 103.4.1.2 is hereby amended by replacing the word "condemnation" with the word
"hazard", to read as follows:
Unsafe heating or electrical equipment and structural hazards. When the chief deems any
The chief is authorized to affix a hazard tag prohibiting the use thereof...
Section 105.8 is hereby amended to include the requirement for a permit for the following
items only:
a.4. Asbestos removal
c.1. Candles and open flame in assembly areas
c.2. Carnivals and fairs
c.7. Compressed gases
c.9. Cryogens.
d.1. Dry cleaning plants
e.1. Explosives and bla5ting
f.1. Fireworks
f.3. Flammable or combustible liquids, for: .
4. Underground tank removal
5. Installation of fuel equipment 6. Installation, removal, alteration of tanks
7. Alternate use of tanks
h.1. Hazardous materials in excess of Article 80 limits
h.3. Hot-work operations
1.1. LPG (see Article 82)
1.2. Liquid- or gas-fue(ed vehic(es in assembiy buildings
0.1. Open burning ,
p.3. Pyrotechnical special effects
t.1. Temporary membrane structures, tents and canopies Section 207F is amended to change the definition of FALSE ALARM to read as follows:
The activation of a device or transmission of an alarm signal, indicating an emergency exists
and/or necessitating response by the Vail Police Department or the Vail Fire Department,
where no emergency exists.
NOTE: Items that aYe dashetl through {4ashed-t-lrangk} are existing amendments that are proposed to be
deleted. Items dhat are under•lined (unclerlined) are proposed new material. Items that are izeither dashed
through nor under•lined are pr-oposed to remain as is.
-6-
Article 10 is amended to add to•Section 1001.6.4, the words as foliows:
Tampering: The unauthorized removal, manipulation, alteration, adjustment, operation,
service, maintenance, installation, or other action, involving an alarm system or components
thereof, including but not limited to wiring, devices, equipment, control panels, switches, and
other appurtenances, by any individual, person, corporation, or other entity, who is not in
possession of a valid and current Town of Vail Contractor's License, as required by Town
of Vail regulations.
Section 1001.7.2, Clear space around hydrants is amended to read:
A clear and unobstructed space shall be maintained around a fire hydrant with the
following minimum distances: front - 15 feet, rear - 4 feet, sides - 7- feet. Fire
hydrants shall be installed and maintained to provide a minimum of 36 inches of
clearance between the center of the outlet caps and finish grade. Standards set forth
by other, agencies, including the water district, may be referenced and enforced
, providing the most restrictive shall apply.
Section 1003.3, Sprinkler Monitoring and Alarms, is amended to read: -
All valves controlling the water supply for automatic fire sprinkler systems and water flow
switches on all fire sprinkler systems shall be electronically monitored.
Section 1003.3 Sprinkler Monitoring and Alarms is further amended to delete items 1 and 2,
as follows:
1 TWon~~i n.~r in ~rn~~ r~ I, ...Ili.~iicin..1n 1.1 ...o.nr! 1 7 (lnn~in~n~ios
. ~y . m.n.....ro . . . ~ ~......p.........
2. Ll .,,.no hi inrJrorl nr mn,.v., in oll n+hor nnn~ monnioc
o... .,.,.,...r.,»..........
Section 1007:2.2.1, General, is amended to delete Exception.1.
Section 1007.2.2.2 is amended to change the phrase " , " to
"occupancy load of 500" in both the section title and the text of the section.
Section 1007.2.4.3 Exterior alarm signaling device is amended to add the words "only when
used as a fire sprinkler flow indicator."
Section 1007.2.9.1.2., Manual fire alarm boxes, is deleted in its entirety.
Section 1106 is hereby amended to read as follows:
SECTION 1106 GAS METERS AND PIPING
Above ground gas meters, regulators, and piping shall be protected from damage by ice or
snow, and if exposed to vehicular damage due to proximity to alleys, driveways, or parking
areas, shall be protected from such damage in an approved manner.
NOTE: Items thczt ai-e dashed t.hrough {dashed Mrengh~ are existing amendments that are proposed to be
deleted. Items that ar-e undeYlirted (undef•lined) areproposed new material. Items that ar•e neither dashed
t12rrough nor under•lined are proposed to remain as is.
r
Section 2501.16 is hereby amended by the addition of Section 2501.16.4 to read as follows:
2501.16.4 Standing Room Only Prohibited. Lessees, owners, managers, promoters, their
employees or agents shall not advertise, allow the sale of, or otherwise permit standing room
only access or tickets to be sold at indoor or outdoor concerts, meetings, or other
assemblies. The use of cross aisles shall be restricted to egress and access only and shall
not be utilized for standing at any such concert, meeting, or other,assembly. The use of the
area between the front row of seating and the stage, bandstand, security barriers or other
similar physical barrier shall not be permitted to be used for standing room.
(Ord. 25(1991) § 1) 10-1-5: AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE:
The following amendments are made to the International Mechanical Code, 1998 edition:
Section 801.12 is amended by deleting the text of item number 6 in its entirety and
renumbering item number 7 as item number 6.
Section 926, "UNVENTED ROOM HEATERS," is deleted in its entirety.
10-1-6: AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE.
The following amendments are hereby made to National Electric Code, 4496 1999 edition:
A. All electrical wiring in Groups A, B, E, F, H, I, aad W, M and S occupancies as
defined in the Uniform Building Code shall be encased in conduits, raceways; or an
approved armor. All wiring in Group R occupancies shall be encased in metal
conduits, raceways, or an approved metal armored cable to the circuit breaker box
for each unit. No aluminum wire or copper clad aluminum wire smaller than size 8
will be permitted within the Town.
B. Persons engaged in the installation of remote control, low energy power, and
signal circuits as defined in article 725 and 760 of this code, need not be licensed
themselves pursuant to Title 12, Article 23, Colorado Revised Statutes, nor work
under the supervision of such licensed electricians; however, all such persons shall
register with the State Electrical Board. Proof of registration shall be produced by the
registrant and qrovided to the Town of Vail Building Official.
C. All such installations of remote control, low energy power and signal systems are NOTE: Items that are dashed thf-ozigh {4shed tkr-eng* are existitig amendmeizts that areproposed to be
deleted. Items that af•e underlined (Linderlined ccre pr-oposed new material. Items that are neither dashed
thi-ough nor undef•lined are proposed to remain as is.
I
-8-
subject to the permits and inspections set forth in 12-23-116 C.R.S. Accordingiy, all installations of remote control, low energy power and signal systems must be
performed in accordance with the minimum standards set forth in the National
Electric Code.
10-1-6: COPIES OF CODES AVAILABLE:
. Copies of all the codes adopted by this Chapter and all amendments thereto shall be
available for inspection at the office of the Town Clerk. (Ord. 25(1991) § 1)
10-1-7: PENALTIES: '
A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the Codes adopted by this Chapter or
. fail to comply therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any order made thereunder,
or who builds in violation of any detailed statements, specifications, or plans submitted and
approved thereunder, or any certificate or permit issued thereunder, or within the time fixed
therein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalty as provided in Section 1-4-1
of this Code. The imposition of a penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation or
permit it to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such
violation or defects within a reasonable time, and each day that the prohibited conditions are
' maintained shall constitute a separate offense.
B.- The Town may maintain an action for damages, declaratory relief, specific performance,
injunction, or any other appropriate relief in the District Court in and for the County of Eagle
for any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter. (1997 Code: Ord. 25(1991) § 1)
2) If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is
for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would
have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or
phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
, 3) The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
4) The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code
of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has
' accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date
NUTE: Iteri2s flzat are dashed thr•ough (dawhed 4} ar-e existing arnendnients tlzat are proposed to be
deleted. Items tliat are undef-liried (underlined) ar•e proposed new material. Items that af•e neither dashed
through noi- underlined are proposed to remain as is.
-9-
hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as
commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted.
The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance
previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
5) All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent
herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repeal shall not '
be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof,
theretofore repealed.
6) The building codes adopted in this ordinance shall be effective for all building
permit applications received by the Town of Vail, Community Development
Department, Building Safety & Inspection Services office Divis+sn, after January 1,
2000.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST
READING this 8th day of December, 1999, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on
the 22nd day of December, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal
Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 22nd day of
December, 1999. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
NOTE: Items that are dashed through 64asked-tlo;eugk-} are existing amendments that ar•e proposed to be
deleted. Items that are underlined (underlined) are proposed new material. Items that are neither dashed
through noi- underlined are proposed tv remain as is.
ORDINANCE NO. 33
SERIES OF 1999
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION
OF.TOWN AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR THE 1998 TAX YEAR AND
PAYABLE IN THE 1999 FISCAL YEAR.
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Town Council to provide for the levy, assessment and
collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1999 year and payable in the 2000
fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail,
Colorado, that:
1. For the purpose of defraying part of the operating and capital expenses of the
Town of Vail, Colorado, during its 2000 fiscal year, the Town Council hereby levies a property
tax of 4.064 mills upon each dollar of the total assessed valuation of $513,881,260 for the 1999
tax year of all taxable property within the Town, which will result in a gross tax levy of
$2,088,413, calculated as follows: .
Base mill levy 4.690 $2,410,103
Mill levy credit (.627) (322,204)
Abatement levy .001 514
Total mill levy 4.064 2 088 413
Said assessment shall be duly made by the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, as directed by the
Colorado Revised Statutes (1973 as amended), and as otherwise required by law.
2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for
any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance,
and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants
thereof.
4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code
of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued,
any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution
commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the
provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive
any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
1 I
5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent
herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be
construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore
repealed.
1NTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this 16th day of November, 1999. A public hearing shall be held
hereon on the 7`h day of December, 1999, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the
Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED in
this 7'' day of December, 1999.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
.
2
TOWN OF YAIL
O, f, j''ice of the Town Manager
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
.
970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157 MEMORANDUM
TM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager
DATE: December 3, 1999
SUBJECT: Town Manager's Report
Leadership Vail Valley
Attached to this memorandum is a press release from the White River Institute regarding a new
leadership program which is being implemented. This program known as Leadership Vail
Valley, is a four month leadership program for Vail Valley residents interested in discovering
and developing leadership capabilities. The Town of Vail is participating in this program in
partnership with the Beaver Creek Resort Company and Cordillera. The Town of Avon is also
expected to join this partnership in the near future.
As indicated, it is a four month program with meetings one day per week during the four month
period. If any of the Council members would be interested in attending this program I can
provide you with information regarding course content, schedules, etc.
Retreat Follow-Un
It is my intention to provide the transcription of the retreat notes for you on Tuesday. We will be
scheduling follow-up sessions in the next few weeks to discuss each of the critical strategies
areas (housing, transportation, infra-structure, etc.). You may want to consider on the Tuesdays
when you do not have night meetings beginning earlier in order to move through these issues in a
timely manner.
RECYCLEDPAPER
UPCOMING MEETINGS
12/14/99 WS
Leo Vasquez - 15 year anniversary
PEC review
annual presentation of investment report
WestFest Wrap-Up
discuss Ski Club Vail's rezoning and redevelopment plan
discuss VPH proposal
discuss W. Vail employee housing
discuss refinance housing bond
12/21/99 WS
DRB review
Ford Park managed paxking
Marketing board
Inc. 500 Group presentation
discuss Ord. re: zone change/Buffehr Creek Park (expansion and conceptual design
presentation)
12/21 /99 TC
15` read Ord. re: zone change/Buffehr Creek Park (expansion and conceptual design
presentation)
2"a read Ord. 36, re: building code
2°a read Ord. 34, supplemental
2"a read Ord. 35, re: Rockledge & Ptarmigan Rd. rezone
Wayfinding phasing schedule
Res. valley-wide census 2000 complete count committee
'flPR-07-1900 21:23 p,02
1-
• W~ IT1La ~ ~ ~ ER
Press Release
'Bo,?M O~ "TRU~r~s. ~ RBTTE RIVER INSTYTYITE ANNQUNCES LEADERSHIP
~ . PROGRAM.
~ . leoberi BWCkma,i ! : .
' • ~ Bucbr~c Isrboratories
vaii valiey, Co necember 2, 1499
Bwger.Conciriniry Gror.p
c.. The White R.iver Instihrte announced today I.eader.~'h$v Vail Valley, a four-
c~ier&,A5,j,°C'~rCS
month leadership program for Vail Valley residents iaterested in discovering
and developing their leadership capabilities.
. ~ 2?'aiiagon Cuides
."CQ:r[ta~:i•.~~r~Pr~a, . The program is designed for individuals from the private, public and not-for-
~.4RCT~io?ral Ttd profit sectors and is intended to build leadership competency at all levels of
~o~ ~oT~-x~i~ both organizations and the community-at-large.
' ' ~Yhite Riv'ei I'naritrue
:~.W. Matliew Jiiechter . According ta Johri Hotan-Kates, the Institute's president, "The purpose of tbe
To,n o:Ro~ . ~ progam is to build a sustainable stream of high performance leaders in the
Vaii Valley to serve and support the long-term health of our cammunity."
pa;a p~`; Horan-Kates said he hopes that from this progmm "participants will become
more effective leaders within their organizations and also in the extended
• • Dr .(olui S: :TamNrkM.A „
C4~7f;ell';~ho[~ of Meditirte COIIITY1L1111~+.
BonRn og , sCHorwes The program will be launched in mid-March 2000 and will include
.:D,:.ieoberi;r,tea~r,'n~u; approximately (20) partieipants in the initiat session. The course has been
made possible thmugh genemus support from the Town of Vail, the Beaver
X~; p~p : Creek Resort Company and Cordillera.
; ".T6e'liialsori Ixutirutc
Town of Vail Mayor Ludwig Kurz commented that, "The Town is enthused
~4,sium: cmua about tlus program because inspired leadership generally creates better
communities. And ernployers wilI find mQre efTective, motivated employees
eoucrm.;.opAnVis:oces are Iikely to be more committed to the vaIley."
:~Syr~e'lN~~ax?veU :
The I,eadership Yail Y411ey course wiIl be an on-going Program,
.UP7.0fin&er implemented oYt a semi-annual basis for diverse constitutiencies. The
, EentesforResaurre Manage-ment program wi11 be open to a11 interested and qualified individuals from East Vail
to Gypsum• Interested persons can self-nominate or be nominated by
; 71ie Inventrire: G?vup employers or associates. Tnterested parties can request a nomination form by
&,;dy;s sinww„ds, F&D. email or regular mail and submit it to the White River Fnstitute by the January
9[rn~piitpn Cejiter 6f 1he. Rockies j 5'h deadiine.
' P.O. Box 6447, Avocv, CO 81620 PHOCVE970-926-78W Fivt: 970-926-4339
~ ' ~ FrKnn.: wri@vail.net Wss: www.wriver.urg
RPR-07-1900 21:24 p,03
A Selection Board of (5) people will seek pazticipation across ages, gender, education,
income, neigbborhood, economic sectors and employment position. Cxiteria far selecting
participauts will be based on genuine interest, leadership pdtential, inclination toward
personal and prc?£essional development and commitment to the progrann. In addition to a
. : . ~ : written application, norninees may be interviewed.
:....The cutriculum to be used is based on the premise that in order to grow as a leader one must
. grow.as a person. The foundation of leadership is buiId upon who you are and what you can
become, not wh$t you do. The program will draw upon a set af "natural principles"
: :geneiated by the Institute's staff, its Board of Scholars and other leadership experts. The
. `program will help create individuals who can lead from a strong internal sense of who they
. are and wha,t they bring to the wortd - something that will benefit all sectors of our
, . ~ community.
. . ' . . ertY g ,
En le President of Cardillera and one of the underwriters of Leadership Yafl Yalle
a y
..•.;~..caaimented, "It is clear t6at ti.me pressures and productivity demands are uicreasing for both
. . 5•t? intlividuals and organizations. We need to develop leaders who can both serve and guide our
.~:a~gamizations and our valley to success."
. .
:Jr.;'' . Atnoft various outcomes that partieipants will realize, perhaps most important, will be the
creation of an individualized "leadership plan" that will chart each persons leaden'ship
developuient. Employers who support participants can expect to see inereased leadership
effectiveness from their people, as well as increased links with leaders in other public and
private organizations.
. .a : .
~~;L,eadetsh~p Vail Valley participants wi11 meet errery other Friday afternoon, plus an extended
a q~'vo-day: ifltensive session in early Aprii. The program will use both the large group and
•~7 _ smalt, group dialogue formats to foster the Iearning and understanding.
. ;4: .
Scliotarships for the program will be provided to every participant who needs financial
support.. A registration fee af $100 will be used to cover program materials and boplcs.
Tirp'1Vfinger and John Horan,Kates will coordinate the leadership prograrn. Minger heads
the Ceuter for Resuurce Management in Denver and is the farmer Town Maaager of thc
. ~ Tawn of Vail. Minger served in the Governor's Cabinet in the mid-1980's and is cturently
. an Adjunct Professor in ths University of Denver's Graduate School of Business. Horan-
-`:Kates helped found the Wlute River Institute and has held various leadership positions in the
Vail V'alley over the past (25) years.
F~or:more inforrnation contact:
Johm.-Horan-Kates, White River Institute, F.O. Box 5447, Avon, CO. Phone (970) 926-7800;
. : .
_ t> ~?ax (970) 926-~t339; emaii at wri
@vail.net.
.
TOTAL P.03
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
Monday, November 22, 1999
MEETING RESULTS
Proiect Orientation / PEC LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ASSENT
John Schofield Galen Aasland Diane Golden
Brian Doyon
Tom Weber
Chas Bernhardt
Doug Cahill Site Visits : 1:00 P.M.
1. Rezoning -1950 Chamonix
2. Webster - 2755 Snowberry Drive
3. City Market - 2109 N. Frontage Rd. West
4. Ski Club Vail - 598 Vail Valley Drive
Driver: Brent
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a minor subdivision, to allow for the re-alignment of the right-of-way, located
at 2755 Snowberry Drive/Lot 10, Block 9, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: David E. Webster
Planner: Brent Wilson
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 6-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITiON:
1. That the applicant provide the Town of Vail Department of Community
Development with a revised final plat with all required signatures for recording,
prior to final Design Review Board approval for any improvements on the property.
ik
70I9NOFYAIL ~
1
2. A request for a variance from Section 11-46-3, to allow for one additional building
identification si~gn, located at 2109 N. Frontage Rd. West/Vail Commons City Market, Vail
das Schone 3~ Filing.
Applicant: City Market, Inc.
Planner: Allison Ochs
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 6-0
TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 13,1999
3. A request for a worksession to discuss a redevelopment proposal involving a rezoning,
conditional use permit revision and development plan approval for Ski Club Vail, located
at 598 Vail Valley Drive / Part of Tract B, Vail Village 7Ih Filing. -
Applicant: Ski Club Vail, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
Planner: Brent Wilson
WORKSESSION -.NO VOTE
4. A request for a rezoning from Primary/Secondary to Outdoor Recreation, located at 1950
Chamonix/Lot 34, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie
Planner: Allison Ochs MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: 6-0
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL
5. A request for a worksession to review a major amendment, to allow for the proposed
redevelopment of the Vail Village Inn, Phase IV, within Special Development District No.
6, and a conditional use permit, to allow for the operation of a fractional fee club in the ~
Public Accommodation Zone District,.located at 100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N, & O,
Block 5-D, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 13, 1999
6. Information Update - White River National Forest Plan amendments.
7. Approval of November 8, 1999 minutes.
The applicatians and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the
Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department - .
2
12/01/99 WED 21:50 FAX 9709499227 SHAMROCR Town Council Nem (M001
' '
~ f .s ~~II~ ~~?'~Z lL~ ~~'L~ ~ ~~~~Z
~ ~ .
~
vvs MA MEETING
~ ~ .
WE.DNESDAY, DECEMBER STH
~ : 8:15 COFFEE
~j 8 :3 0 MEETING
C';OLORA.DO SKI MUSEUM
' AGENDA
. ' .
• TURN IT UP ! • EMPLOYEE 4F THE MONTH
• "I'M FROM VA.IL..."
• FREE SKI LESSON
• INTERNET REF''ORT AND SURVEY
• WELCOME PA(--KET •"SANTA CLAU S IS COMING TO TUWN..."
u
ToWv oF vA~, 75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FAX 970-479-2157
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 2, 1999
Contact: Greg Hall, 479-2160
Public Works/Transportation Director/Town Engineer
DOWD JUNCTION RECREATION PATH CLOSES FOR WINTER SEASON ,
(Vail)--The Dowd Junction recreation path has closed for the winter season at the request of
the Colorado Division of Wildlife. The winter closure allows for the migration of deer and elk and
was a condition of the recreation path's approval. Gates have been used to indicate the path's
closure as well as signs explaining the requirement.
The path will reopen in the spring at the direction of the Division of Wildtife. That reopening
date will be determined following a review of a migration study conducted over the past finro
years.
For more information, contact Greg Hall, public works/transportation director, at 479-2160.
# # #
RECYCLEDPAPER ;
i
,
MEMORANDUM
December 1, 1999
To: Vail Town Council
Bob McLaurin
Pam Brandmeyer
Steve Thompson
From: Sally Lorton
Re: October sales tax collections
Attached please find the latest sales tax worksheet. I estimate I'll collect another $7,400.00 in
October sales tax to bring October collections to $513,998.00. If so, we will be down $18,654.00
or 3.5% from budget and down $1,533.00 or.30% from October 1998. In October 1998 we had
the World Wide Church of God group in town and the Seibert Circle Dedication Party. T'he
World Wide Church of God did not visit in 1999.
~
;
. :
I
i
~
Town of Vail
Sales Tax Worksheet
12/1 /99
% Change % Change
7ss9 Huuget ~rom irom
Month 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 1997 1998 Budget Co/lections Variance 1998 Budget
January 1,126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,855,364 1,805,707 1,894,597 1,935,782 2,052,569 2,115,359 2,188,943 2,065,876 (123,067) -2.34% -5.62%
February 1,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,828766 1,814,495 1,816,107 1,993,389 2,089,673 2,153,121 2,228,041 2,020,814 (207,227) -6.14% -9.30%
March 1,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 1,988,090 2,250,656 2,139,298 2,240,865 2,580,992 2,368,077 2,450,164 2,413,592 (36,572) 1.92% -1.49%
April 550,205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 864,303 794,668 791,092 966,993 874,427 1,107,334 1,145,861 952,059 (193,802) -14.02% -16.91%
May 170,567 215,548 236,359 250,809 268,000 257,248 287,315 324,681 318,920 329,783 382,718 396,027 370,241 (25,786) -3.26% -6.51%
June 329,039 393,470 448,227 468,948 468,598 475,161 548,820 590,685 594,907 630,366 633,400 655,430 692,168 36,738 928% 5.61°/a
July 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 811,538 892,830 893,483 963,717 1,043,637 1,107,882 1,146,156 1,129,771 (16,385) 1.98% -1.43%
August 575,887 668,119 678,071 761,992 767,257 825,954 891,566 867,125 990,650 1,073,430 1,183,926 1,224,834 1,048,899 (175,935) -11.41% -14.36%
September 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 485,954 560,535 725,205 645,902 630,453 637,831 735,608 760,913 800,533 39,620 8.83% 5.21%
October 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367,578 400,525 408,405 461,791 413,573 472,836 515,531 532,652 506,598 (26,054) -1.73% -4.89%
Total 6,822,389 8,265,646 8,700,946 9,154,425 9,259,517 9,867,484 10,419,667 10,424,761 11,049,249 11,785,544 12,302,956 12,729,023 12,000,551 -728,472 -2.46% -5.72%
November 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 497,907 553,681 594,491 611,147 601,208 707,166 656,596 678,336
December 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,775 1,846,223 1,974,553 1,992,855 1,994,540 2,068,851 2,254,709 2,070,834 2,132,272
Total 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,603,647 12,395,718 13,007,013 13,030,448 13,719,308 14,747,419 15,030,386 15,539,629 12,000,551
> > /21ai9g ,
to: Vaii Town Council
from: M.K.Arnett
Dear elected officials,
This note is to inform you of my desire to serve as an "at larqe" member
of the Vail Marketinq Board.
I claim no specific knowledge of marketing, other than that I've gleened
from my town council experiance and the two years I've been a member
of the VVTCB Board of Directors. I also represented the town in the
meetings that were to lead to the formation of a regional marketing
effort. When it became evident to me that other potential partners were
either unwilling or unprepared to proceed, I suggested that we,(the town),
pursue an independant marketing district. I do believe, (in the long run),
the regional approach would best serve the marketing needs of Vail, and
the Eagle River Valley. At the same time I maintain that any marketing
representation must exist on a pro-rata scale.
I've been accused, (by some), of havinq one of the more creative minds in
our community. I'm ready to put this creativity to work by taking what-
ever direction i'm given by the council, and making positive efforts on
the Vaii Marketing Board. My commitment to this community remains.
Also I'm kinda cute, and a really qood dancer.
Michae K. Arnett RECEIVED NOV 2 9 1999
RaderEngineering Inc.ii=.iiii
P.O. Box 780 • 133 Riverside Ct Suite #1 • AVON, CO 81620 • Telephone 970-845-7910 • Fax 970-845-7522 • e-mail drewsld@vail.net
December 1, 1999
Ludwig Kurz & Vail Town Council
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: GRFA Requirements
~ Gentlemen,
In recent projects, we have noticed a drop in dedicated mechanical space on new construction.
Maximization of living or usable space by the designer or Architect has been the primary
motivation of this trend. Current Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) requirements indicate
425 square foot credit is available per Single Family Residence, Two-Family Residence, or
Primary Secondary Residence in addition to the standard requirements. In conversations with
the Vail Building Department, this credit was originally intended for dedicated mechanical
space, though it is not specifically stated. Because of this discrepancy, designers aze using this
credit to maximize living space, disregarding or li.miting the mechanical space, which is required
for safe and efficient heating and/or cooling of the structure.
We are proposing an amendment to the current GRFA requirements to have this non-specific
credit changed to a specific mechanical space credit as originally intended by the code. This
change will solve many space and safety concerns not only by the mechanical engineer or
designer, but also concerns by the Building Deparhnent.
Please review your information on this subject and contact us regarding this issue. We look
forward to your call.
Sincerely,
~
J. Drew Rader, P.E. Dan Goodman
Principal Design Engineer
DEAN O. MORTON
, 25857 WESTWIND WAY
, LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA 94022
TELEPHONE:(650) 941-2971
FACSIMILE: (650) 941-6243
December 1, 1999
Mr. Greg Hall
Director
Town of Vail
Department of Public Works/Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Hall:
I'm told by Jeff Bailey, at the Lodge at Lionshead, that the shielding fence alona the
south end of the Lionshead Charter Bus Lot has been installed. He further stated that it
was nice looking wood construction.
I want to thank you, the Town Council, the Community Development Department, and
others involved for your responsiveness on this matter. Although I haven't seen it yet, I'm '
sure this added screening is a significant enhancement in the appearance of this parking
facility and we want you all to know your action is appreciated.
Sincerely,~'
~
Dean and LaVon Morton
Lodge at Lionshead, Phase 3, Unite 11 • cc: vVail Town Council
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Larry Pardee, Street Superintendent
Jeff Bailey, General Manager, Lodge at Lionshead
~
. . . . . - ;
~
F
. ,
~
I
~
'~';f~ ;k.~ ~ e` ~•i t~:`? ~ X-y ~ 1~.~ {
: , . ta~t`- . • . { z - ~ . f ~ i
~ } ~ ' ~ I j . ~ •O ~ , ay` I ` F ~
, ~ : . . ? ~ f i'1. ..i , 1
~ p • z' ~ { 3,i ~y~' r :
-a .~F ~ ~ • e ~
l ~
~ .t ; c . • .Y.~y9 .°J r '1t4, 4
T .3i i
s ' ~ l.r z ~~„he'.`~ . • ~ 9 ' t-t~~ i, i ,~ts ~.a °S i j .
mponauthoAlY
Q~
i g iF~ d ~ , ' - : G~' . • g~ Ra ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ f
oo ~v~~
? r Z'i ,r ~.:v , 3 - a • - ;t e~ 4' a„ a,r,,~'~~ #'}y~~{ tk'~~ ~ #l ~ ~ ' f , ' , y - b c - - ~ 'k i ~ { ~ ~ ~ v
S :
7 (
`aj ~f ',i .w t1~A~/SPO~1~T;'0~..' 1~~01~'~~~.~ ~;~'t. t~ • . .
i f < 3 i
~
~ d f. n 1 i .F'.. 'a+ . F
e~
~J,
a ~ t +e .e =A
S t~
`PECI
~ ~ ORD~A I~ ~Nv~ S YOtI 0 A ~ x# ~ ~ ,
s"' • }V.; j :5- k ' - . •g . _ ~ I ~ Cr .
~y
t ~
j~+k
~r. 'r i yr ' . . • . , ~y : a x s .
L`f ' : . . . < t t : g 7 ~ `i~ Y Yt~ 3-.R .
" : . 1 ~ F _ . i~ . . . ~ ~ q. •t a S. r~
: s t. - • _ . , 0~ ? . ' ,x ap'~ ~ . 4,~
_
K}
`"D . . ~ i.` t'~~ Sn W~ y~
j . . . f 1 , ~ _ . ' ~ i . f .a N,e' P ~ J ~ . •sm{3~ ry i. S i ~ n'~
p .
$ j ~ .c ;s _ . . a . ` ~1~f~7J..' • - ~ 14 1 ia4nu.t ~ . 7.3~? a
t.
k • ' _ ; dN . ; ~ i ~ + ~ t sF S,e,
¦~oo~oo •
? G~ j s r' ~ ~ _ . 1- T 4.r ~A a ~Etri'
..s . p e ix ,q,... t ~ .er4'~4 ~f~~~a p~~i '°su.yj~
r ~ ° ~ s~1 ' . • ~ ~ a~ t "T}: + . xa . a^ ~ ~ '~S 4 ~~'°~.S`.~ e ~%~,.~s ' j.
A ,~Y , ~ ~r i ~ ? r
34
~.y~
'
~~v~~
yU+ ~
. ~ ~ ` . - , , ; , - :x.- . t, ;x
a w s a~~d t -1Cy
tEv
]/,h ' . L ~,f ~J r b t d ,e~f3 (~Y } . § i t~ 3YCf' ,k.,.
~j.~ 3€t rRa t,
x ..n i ~:r,yJ'. 1 " • O ~ ~ a a+3~ 1
r , j ~ n ~ ,i a ' ' . . , :f £ ~ti~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ( fiRS1 ~100R Of iNE AvOM 60R1 B~iLDiNG, fORMEQLY~GRAUiE'S) , ? . ; , ~ ~ , < .
' J ~ • ~ . ~ • ~ . ' ~ .e a. { l . y .
ah"f : r i :
t d i .
: y ~ • • ~ , T ~ . • ~ 4 ~ , ~~~`e • ~ • ~ i"`f ~{al 1 ; .G ' . • J . .
-1,-
,
_
, ' , . ' • ~ F . • 1~:.~,=.::~ ~
~ . i d . !ti.,v- ,x•~',
i
r cho *
t idcare citps
Created by the Childcare Resource & Refenal of Eagle & Garfield Counties
A program of The Resource Center of Eagle County
December and January, 1999
"Peace on Earth Begins at Home "
Letter from Dana Damm
Deaz Providers:
As many of you know, the Department of Human Services in the five counties of the Rural Resort
Region (Eagle, Pitkin, Garfield, Lake and Summit) , in a joint effort to promote quality childcare and to
enhance the licensing procedure, have contracted with the state to provide their own Licensing Specialists
~ to inspect, investigate complaints, and to license childcaze homes.
The five counties have hired two Licensing Specialists, one for Summit and Lake Counties, and one
for Garfield, Eagle and Pitkin Counties. .The have.also hired one administrator for the project, Bill Evans.
Jan Englemann will continue to license Summit County homes and will also license Lake County. I was
hired as the Licensing Specialist for Garfield, Eagle and Pitkin and will begin on December 1, 1999. We aze
all excited and hopefui that this will be a positive change for all providers in the five county region.
The negative part of this change is that I will no longer handle referrals for Eagle and Garfield
Counties. I will miss that! Thank you for allowing me to serve you in that capacity for the last several years.
I look forward to continuing our relationship.
Sincerely,
_ Dana L. Damm
Dana tivill continue to handle referrals until a new coordinator is hired for the job. The Referral phone
line remains 1-800-513-8859. We will be transferring the line in mid-December. If, for some reason, it is
troubled during the move, please be reassured that it will work again!
A=-- r='-1 r=- 3%~ s.w s. r. •t4 ra rC~ a. 1a a-a ra s. ^ F~ 1. :5 ra rw r~ Child Care Resource & licLppy
sr,;Referral: 1-500-513-8859
A 4
i; tASy'
r~
A CORRA
r^ ro r~ aa ra ra a•~ a~ ro r~ r~ ra ra ra r~, a~
PARTNER
1
f,mployrnont Opportunities Eag1e county Famfly ~
Child Care Association
program Gomrdinator
Child ounti sare Resource & Referral of Eagle and Garfield January 11,2000
C
The Resource Center of Eagle County is accepting applications 6:30pm until 8:00pII1
for the position of Program Coordinator of the Child Care R&R at the Eagle Cty. Library
of Eagle and Garfield Counties. Must have two years of post
secondary education or experience in Early Childhood Education
and/or Huma.n Services. The successful applicant must be multi- Officer Bill Kaufman of the Eagle
task oriented, have a pleasant telephone demeanor and working County Sheriff's Office will discuss
lrnowledge of Windows 95. Fax cover letter and resume to: Attn. safet3' ~~anger awareness to the
Bev Christiansan 970/949-7087 or mail to P.O. Box 2558, Avon, children in our caze. You will receive
Colorado 81620. one hour of training. Call Cazol for
more information- 524-9581.
Full Time Director ~ % t~ ~
Little Red Schoolhouse 4,40;
~
The historic Little Red Schoolhouse in Snowmass Village is
looking for a full time director for its NAEYC accredited Attention Parents, Providers
preschool and toddler programs. We provide a supportive envi- aud anyoIIe
ronment with flexible benefits and a salary commensurate with interested in early childhood!
experience. Please fax your resuma to 970/923-4602. Please attend the
The Eagle County Family Child Care Association
meets monthiy. To learn more about becoming a member or about Early Childhood
the training's they offer, please contact Carol at 524-9581. Council Meeting
The next meeting will be held on January 1 lth at 6:30 at the Eagle
County Library. See announcement in newsletter. Wednesday,
Pre-licensing Training will continue to be taught by Dana January 5th
Damm Please contact her at 974/945-7121 for future training 6:30pm at
`ates. Avon Elementary
Child Find- Do you have any concerns about any of the
children with whom you aze working? Do any of your parents Details of topics will follow in
have concerns about their child's speech and language develop- the mail closer to the date...
ment? We know that the early childhood yeazs aze the critical time
to support a child's development. Child Find is a community Input from community mem-
service that provides a FREE hearing, vision and developmental bers is strongly encouraged!
screening for any child from birth through five years of age. It is
held twice monthly on Friday momings between 8:30am and please RSVP to Jeawe Mc-
12:00pm Pazents can schedule appointments by calling the Child
Find voice mail at 845-5999 or by calling Sharon Thompson at Queeney at 328-1375. Piaa will
845-6370. be provided based on the num-
The dates through 1999 aze December lOth and 17th. ber of people who RSVP!
~ - - _ _
.
` CPSC Warns Against Placing Babies in Adult Beds
Study finds 64 deaths each year from suffocation and strangulation
Washington, D.C.- The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CP5C) is warning parents and caregivers
about the dangers of placing babies to sleep in adult beds. A CPSC study published in the October issue of the
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine found that placing babies to sleep in adult beds puts them at
risk of suffocation or strangulation. This is a danger of which many parents and cazegivers are unawaze. The
study revealed an average 64 deaths per year to ba.bies under the age of 2 years placed to sleep in adult beds,
including waterbeds and daybeds.
A review of incident data from January 1990 to December 1997 linked adult beds to at least 515 baby deaths.
Analysis of the deaths revealed four major hazard patterns:
* Suffocation associated with the co-sleeping of adult and baby.
* Suffocation where an infant becomes entrapped or wedged between the mattress and another object.
* Suffocation due to airway obstruction when the baby is face down on a waterbed mattress.
* Strangulation in rails or openings on beds that allow a baby's body to pass through while entrapping the
head. -
CPSC's study is the first to quantify the number of fatalities resulting from the practice of co-sleeping with ba-
bies. Of the 515 deaths, 121 were reported to be due to a parent, caregiver or sibling rolling on top of or against
the baby while sleeping. More than three-quarters of these deaths occurred to infants younger than 3 months.
The other 394 deaths resulted form suffocation or from stranguiation caused by entrapment of the child's head
in various structures of the bed. Entrapments occurred between the mattress and the wall, bed frame, head-
board, footboard, bed railings or adjacent furniture.
One of the most tragic aspects of these deaths is that they aze largely preventable. In many cased, the adult plac-
ing the baby in the adult bed was unaware of or underestimated the danger posed. The practice of co-sleeping
can result in the adult rolling on top of or next to the ba.by smothering him or her. Mothers who breastfeed
should be alerted to this hazard and should be encouraged to return the baby to the cnb after breast-feeding.
"Don't sleep with your baby or put the baby down to sleep in an adult bed," said CPSC Chairman Ann Brown.
"The only safe place for babies is in a crib that meets currents safety standards anci has a firm, tight-fitting mat-
tress. Place babies to sleep on their backs and remove ail soft bedding and pillow-like items from the crib."
Ofthe 394 entrapment deaths, 296 were on adult beds, 79 were on waterbeds and 10 were on daybeds. Bed
rails , which are portable railings that can be installed on toddler and adult beds to keep toddlers from falling out
of beds, accounted for nine baby deaths. CPSC is workirig with the bed rail industry on the design of these
products to reduce the hazard.
For 1998 and 1999, the Commission is aware of at least 76 additional deaths, 35 due to suffocation associated
with co-sleeping and 41 due to entrapments. The Archived of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, a member of
the Journal of the American Medical Association family of journals, study "Adult Beds Are Unsafe Places for Children to Sleep," primarily written by CPSC's Suad Nakamwra, Ph.D., was co-authored by Marilyn Wind,
Ph.D., (CPSC) and Mary Ann Danello, Ph.D., (CPSC). Nakamura gave details about the findings at an AMA
briefing in New York today. (September 29, 1999)
~ DEC. 3. 1999 1:31pM i Na, 6768 p. 1/2 ~
I
i
e;
~
BEA.VER CREEK RES;ORT COMPANX
FOR IMMEDUTE RELEA5E
Media Contacts: Kelly Ladyga, (970) 845-5292, Kiadyg~~-vailresons.com
Christina Schleicher, (970) 845-5136, 5scblei1l
~
MIKE IRECTOR OF ACTIUIUS AT BEAVER CIZEEK
~
BEAVER CREEK, Colo. - I7ec. 3, 1999 - Mike Klosex W recently been named Director of
Activities for Beaver Creek, a new position created by thr Beaver Creek Resort Company
(BCRC). Kloser will staft in his this position on Dec.15, '1949, after he returns frozn competition
in the Discovery Channel Eco-Challenge in Patagonia, A'rgentina. .A,s Director of Activities,
Kloser will be responsible for coordinating and marketin,g special events and weekly acfi'vities
~
within the village. ~
;
One of the many activxties that Kloser will be overseeingiat Beaver Creek is the "Welcome to
Beaver Creek" event, which will take place every Sundai? evening by the ice rink. The event
helps guests to learn about upcoming weekly activities, v~cluding ski or snowboard lessons and
programs at the Vilar Center. Cruests can book these actiyities and then lace up some skates and
enjoy complimentary 1ce slcating. The Figure Skating Se ~es is another fun event tha# will be
overseen by YCloser. This free skating exhibition takes pl3ce from 6-6:30 p.m. every Monday
aight and features local amateur figure skaters. Kloser wlll also oversee Tuesday Night at the
Movies, Thursday Night Astronomy and the Snowshoe .Afdventure Series. Next summer, he will
host avaziety of on-mountain hiking amd mountain bilanl; activities,
i
Last winter, Kloser worked as Adventure Ridge Operations Mavager at Vail. He spent the
swmmer at Beaver Creek constructing mountain bike trail;s and ruuning ongoing summer
activities. "Mike's past experience and ability to zun actirties at'Vail and Beaver Creek, and his
commitment to world-class services, make him an outstatliding choice for birector of A,ctivities,"
~
-more-
I
~
I
P.O. $ox 5390 • Avnn, Colorado 81620-5390 (P70) 845•5858 • FAX (970) 845•5945
, I
DEC. 3.1999 1:31PM N0.8768 P. 2/2
KLOSER NAN,Ep DIRECTOR OF ACTIVITIES
2-2-2
said Tony O'Rourke.
Kloser is an avid mountain biker anid a top international cArnpetitor in the sport. In 1988, he
became the world mountain bike champion. He went on to become the first American to race
extensively on the European World Cup Circuit. In 198S, he wan the European Mountain ]Bike
Championships. His enoxmous contributions to the sport of mountain biidng have earned tum
much recogilition; Mountain Bike Action named him ozze of the top ten mountain bikers of all
time. The Vail Valiey has benefited from Kloser's expertise, as he helped design many of the
bildng trails on the mountain and in the Valley. Kloser v •on this year's 100-mile mountain bike
race in Vail, the Vai1 Ultra 100.
Presently, Kloser is in Patagonia, Axgentina, training for the 1999 Discovery Chatuiel Eco-
ChaIlenge as a member of Team Vail. The Eco-Challenge takes place from Dec. 1-12, 1999, and
is a physically demanding expeditian that requires compe titors to navigate through the
wilderness using limited resoutces. Using a map and conipass, each tea;nn will rely on horseback
ridiug, mountaineering, kayaking, whitewater canoeing a id cliumbing as the rneans to reach their
final destination. Kloser has already represented Team Vail at tvvo Eco-Challeriges. At the 1997
competition in Australia, the team finished in 19"h place. Last year, Kloser helped lead Team
Vail to victory in the Eco-Challenge in Morocco. Kloser and his wife, Emily, and two kids live
in Vail.
Vail Plaza Hotel
1999 Maj or Amendment Proposal
Attachments
December 13, 1999
1\
.
FF~~~
_
' _ ` ` ~ / ~ a ~ 1 f . . _ • _
• ` ` • ` \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~*+~Yfj~~ s Et 1 j
. 4 / I
d v,
.~C
} ssw 1 (
IL ~ r
~ ~
I 3
, A. r.;, s y t~ xt Y~
~ .`1"~r~ k4 i~ 4 r 4 ~ . ~ ~ J:.i• ~~.,~~5 ~ ,d:~ y...
. ~ .
i ,'i fi.....,.~' 1 ~.ikF.t„~,:~~ ~ V - ~ # ~r}f~' • ~ Pi~ifi~~ i
y~~ik1~y ~ p , 4 ~~+r i 1 u
~ ~ ~ a t~~~~W s ~i . ~ ' " s, s• ~ ~ , , t s , i ~,j ,
S~{~T.
;;a t+ + ~ ~ : - y
: sU t ~ss.:.. h
~ ~ # u ?~r ' . ' 3~99~+~ b r ar ~l.,.w ~ . ak l~? xs
V .
~ }F ~ i s ~ l f t afl,
~ : ~ ~S ~ 51.: ~ a , .
. x
~
. . , _
o 20 ao xn
DuaStop f7
• ~
rale:l"=2o• ~ ~
~ Zn^ E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel Si p
E~rac. te Illusstrative Plan ~
~n~o;wunr~u~aiaun.iueu U vall, CUIOI'a(J.0
.....o.,
Nov.ember 23, 1999
~
I
.
.
, , _ I
- I-70 Franinge Roarl
f
.
,
. , . ~ _
~
.
.
;
,
C) C~ ~ ~ o t~ --~n~-" - ;
~ I I
r. ~ Gateway Building Vail \'illage Lui ~ i
~ Building B
Phase llI
4......._..._...... ~
~ I ' i.
_ ~
~ ~ .
,
:
.
J.
L
~ ~
$uilding A ~
Vaii Viltage ljn ~
~ ~ ; ! ~ip' ~ ~~~~~jl ^ ~~~Q~~Q~ ~ i i Yhase 7~ ~
Plxase '~-1 Phase Ilt
r C).~
: , a ; . ' ~
~ ~ ~ ~v51 voIag 'w~'~
Circulnliuu Legencl
A ~ C
B
: ,
Lxternal Pedestrixn
~
Vail Village Ian . . East Dleadow Drive
Phase V .
~ •
,
-
(nterual
~ ~ - ~ ~j '
~
'
-j 1-"
VQl11C11lA1'
~ Z E H~R~E N Va.ll Pla.Za HOtel 1.. T
~ ano•assocIn^esr~c. , ~~~LU~i~llUll 1~lail
Vall, Colarado
a• Scplenber 27. 1999 Not ta Seale
_ - _ _
. I'
t '
; 1 ~ 11 I
~ I ~ I I
.
, ' ~ I n . ~
. ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ .
- ;
. . . . . ~
. ~ , : ` ~ / ' . ~ . . . . . . . . . ~
, . i` _ .
. . . . . ;r . _
~ . . .:+,~..z:;. ~ ~
. . : , i ° .,.:.~~.t::~..
, i
. ;
~ . ' -
. ~ ~
.
. . •
\ . . , .
. , i '
_ -
"l
, - , . ~ -
. ......r _ ~ : - _
, . ,
. . 'i.,.,
t y ~
'1 I ~ ~r~ ` ~ ~•4 x
„v
+ -e,
A.~ 'M~-r-*i!
~ . ~ . _ . : . . ~
' ~ I~ . 1 F.. ~ 1$ ,i' ~ ~ _L-1 i ~
~
t
,
4h~
,
, I 1 ; ~ r:? i
...1...._.
i
1 I
C i ~ I
h~`
. . '
. . . _
_ .
t
: : \
` i
, • . , ~ . j{~
~
:
i .
. .
~ J ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ i •
, ~ - -
i ; . . f71 I~ f~ ~ \ ~ r C ~ r~,
~'A
, . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ / \ . . - :}i'-~ .
,
\
~ . ` ~ ~~:~_..._...i• N ~ ` s, r`~ ~S}b \ ~C_ . .
I ~
\ , ; r+ J ; `,i ~ y~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i S ~ ~ , ,.1
'j
~_1 (h " _
• . ~ ~ ~r y
~1
\ i~o_/
ZUE" R E" Vail Plaza Hotel
S1tC V1g[tetteS
Vail, Colorado Key Plan
- November 23, 1999
i .
PLAZA PROMENADE
. _
"d
llccess oint into x I
p p t o i n e n a d e a r e a
•Ilandicap access to all levels of
promellade.
LANDSCAPE NODE
• Hardscape/Softscape nodes identify
transition areas along promenade and
rnews. ~ M-w
CL1uJnlo~v~L S~ralR
• Grand scale transition in promenade
levels.
F
15' ~1 ky i.r i
~ G c'p ( - II I
] ~~k HOTEL ElV1'RY
• Guest and/or pedestrian Access to
hotel & public spaces.
.~n
777-
fff
Of PIAZET IA
~
• Garden plaza at pool for hotel Guests
~
, ~ f.~.e' ~
~ ZN E H R E N vall Pl~.IZN. HVte1 . Slt!', VIgIIet~.~,'S
~i~E;lunF ~~nhNixp
~ AD F A oOC.ncam~o.e~INC. '
NtF~~ons•i.x0ic+re~nc~i~r(ei~nE
Vail, Colorado
November 23, 1999
PLAZA
• Outdoor dining & Seating area
~ Major activity center ,
a.
iY~;'s tt e ~ , •I~I y~ , t:~; ~ ~
C€. ~?ifi1i` ~ ' ' r ~r ~ a 'i
TIZANSITION SPACE
,
• 1~latei-ial, grade, changes signai
~
cliange in space and scale. .
i
o '
Mzws
• . M... i' S~I I ~~1 ~ ~~~F 1 . +I ~ ..F+N
Gai-den pallis create connect i o n s b e-
~
tweenspaces.
~
.
' . 3'4 ai f .,I . ~b''~
Z 4~ ,T
r ~
T [ ( ~
1 M'r 9M
¦'Ol~rl,L'1L
tj~j nfrl.u E .~t ~ :
• Architectural elelnents signal entries
111t0 C]1S11g1Ilg Sp1CeS. - `r:~`
I ~
F 5"
PEDLS I'RIAN CONNLCTIONS
• Paving patte1-ns identify pedestrian
cannections betweeli new & existing
spaces.
~ Z F H R E N q~~i.(~
Vail Plaza ~Iotel
~ AN °c,^O'e`4ara;~eimNC. i;l Nli{J~iiel.l4s
villl, C0l01'ildO
November 23, 1999
r.
_ _ . _ .
_ _ ~ _ .
- - - , - -
t r ~ a
s f I
j . ~ ~,,alk~ f x~ ;
~I _5 5. ~ sF.r t f
I
v lti.
V ii 1~ bf
f~.tls +zLt ~"r; . +t F I
' . Y^.~WV"I.~4 • p?'
; . ' r&4 9 `t-1h~. n'.~?c47•~`b~'" ~.,.9, . ~ 'S~f . - ~~~~~~A,~~
' I f"~w~k"~• e u a~ r ~ ~'r~~ d : ~'r~'~" ~ ~
fk4t ~
_ ;.9
} y, .
I 'te 3 Y..~ ~ .
~
~it
I F ..c,$~
~4 L :F.. ?i~ A Yryl"~~~
:i ~~ryJ~~~. ~ :
Q'F
oE~
.
k.i
I
t
~ .
~I
h;',ifd5~'~5~ 3 { f~ { F •1. k_ ' -
V41,i ot -.'1 ~ ~ A r ~ ~
, ~"olora~.lt~
dAsf ~'~?~`i~~~~~,~~?w
1.~!1€1
I
, . ,
. , i. .
h~.liYr.17, y~~y~1 j7~' ~ ~ .ptBj.t~:~ ~r..~#~r ii.r~"- Y.7"~.e.'~!G'$r.~'a' ~.,E ;.r~0~ .,i'~:tb a+3 ~~~~:Fi ~r,.~. . ~t ~U" u:F .iL:'i::J..i . r•~yr u1~i,.y, ,w1fji.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7~~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~P ~ ~ , s P~""i r~ ~ ~I
I
.
,
II
, .
~
^
I aax" . -
n
a~
I iy L
t
7-
i
I „!d:' d J II .
I ~ ' n
~
p a
I ~ M, ' ~ y f s I
I A y~~Y K 1A.
; i t k ~r . ~ v,~ # `
L y
s P ( , ~ ~-~h 4
I; . ~ . . . .
t-la,,.. ~a ( ,
A E ~
~ ~~ot4
~~~~~~u" . N'ittl, CI)IUCadCi
1'Joi~en~ber23, 1tl~~l ~i`.,~R~i~ M'~~::~`1;:~
_~r.. .
_ -
. . .
,
_ _ _
, . ,
r~
;
;I
:}!,~{.;7}ktd
Tl~
iq;
.
. :
t
( I .
r
~.d, .
,
1
,
~~.a y. 7~; +~~~r.~f.~ - ~ a , rM1 r~'M~,rf.j•~`
j ~ r ~ s a~;p ~ ~ ~ • ~ ` - ° i ~ ~
, . . ;
L r,.~.. ~ : ~ ~ i
.
~ ' ~ •
1 • ' ' ' ~ . ' :
f~
w ,
~
~
, . . . „ .
;
• , ` , F . '
i ~7p Y ~?N,.:~ '1.- R`•~4. .
d
I
. .
z
g ~ li~za`~~ _f~_~'~ t.a l L• p
I ~P~1~7~~! ~.J~~I:.~'C~{,f~~lN +•,~~~~..V~.~~'~
i Nta1 c.tiibe,' ;!3, 1999
- -
l-
~
~
- 01 e m
~
ED ~
i $uilding p
v~
I~
B i -
- N/I
0
,
\ q
_J
~
J
U ~
/
_ - _ - - - \
Va0 ~ o
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ml Ham Hote~ t ff~o'rn
b ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~6k~ ~
Vail, Coloradv
AMCterua . nnr" ra . rmir.re - I
r.oxu un nvort araaoo ~i~e Noventber 13, 1999 Scale: 1"= 5U'_u"
m n~clMOifr r.~xnmrw~o~o
.
~ . ,
° _
45-UI' Pwelling --C-1------~
~ p o o ~ov« <<~~i
- u'i' ~
ga °
0 ° 4,_U~~ 41-UL CO
_ I <..U,.
0
i ~ Building B ~ - - -
9* 43-UL ~
O
41-iIL
• -
` O
I
v. ~
z
~ - ~
O
- ~
i
i
~
- -A
~
VaH Ham ~ ~ a-fl u~ ~ ~ ~'~ott~~ ? (Lc~vc~ S a~s
nNO nssocinres, iNC. . Vail, Colorado
A-MM. . ~ Scalc: I 50'-U"
r.o-x un n-, marv~teo nwe November 23, 1999
mmwsnavr rNdmrwiwa
-
~ - , -T
t--r-i
. ~ ~ . , ~ ~ o
. _ ~ r
L
AS L
[J
i IJ.L ~ n~~ _ _t_ _ O
v- - - r \ I / l I
I 1 I3uildictgH
~ i
I ~L
„ -LL
- 4
I I ( I~~ I I 1 _ I
~ m O m
3111 UL 6{UL 17{UL -
1 , W
~
0
~
_ - ~
i ~
~ o ~
~ ~ o--~ ~ ~ ~ (~1
~9~1~ ~ Ham ote~ i ~.c~vcD ~ove
nND nssocinIes, iNC. Vail, Colorado
• ~..~x . M.~.
~a nm+Nm~r 1.1lSMM~IdO
November 23, 1999 Scale: I"= SO'-0"
, _ vpb ~ ~rto ~v .31d~~~ ~y
`
~ - - - ~ ~
4r ~ ~ '
\ ~ • - ~ C3 ~,~~~~t ~
~ ( r R
~ L
~ - 5----- i
~ i ~ ~ ao os ap e 446 ~ ?a~ . a `r--- -
13~ 111 ii; tts- an-r
I 7
,1- - r
i °
117 - - 7 uio 0
I1A 1{Y O
% ) 11
mi ~ ~ j in ~
~ - r BUSI(Itllg B ~I ~
I
~OL
F•-
-
27-UL Spm
. .
-0
~
- - - 3 -ci. 10 ~ - - ~ .
° n
\ ~ - ~ - ~T T~ - - - ~ I - `~11~ , ~ 1?" ~ - - ~ .
~
/
_ - _-1-~-- '
f I F ~
o~,~. ~
o uL
' ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~140 Haza r~ot~~ ~ ? Levd I~o&
nrvo ~ssocinres, INC. Vail, Colorado
.KMN.W. ~Nm~ Novemher 23~ 1999 Scile: I"= 50'-0„
~.ONAI if)f AWJ. Wn4P0 1iate
RL If)qf/fa1f1 IA«~Nf~1o10
~
` ~ ~ ° - - _ -
v~'•`` - - ~
~
0
H: ~ n ru ~r~s _ 31-F
32
i " --tito ~
~ ~ -
M7 (
HB L ~ H9 Q
- BB
o~ Ht1 _ f1 N1 til4 i
Hi - ~ ~B~uilding B~
HI6 , a
"i
_
;
nkch;n
Ca M,ia os C B• ~
- - - - aos aos
1 26.F _ ~
sa 6a °sa° a °m ~
~ - 17 H1B H19 H20 H31 H22 H7J h12 - ~
~
~ H75 ~ M26 2A-
~
13-F
:0)
cm
J J [l l
~
_ --A*
~ a
T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~o o Maza ot~ fl ~ ? ~~vd Three
ANO ASSOCIATES, iNC. -Vail, Colorado
. . n"°"m Scale: 1 50'-011
November 23, 1999
m era..w:r r~n*•...~o.e
~
~ ~
•
,e a~ ~s ~a ~ L ~ 7 J
H,
r
H2
' I 119
M6 (
{17 . 1. tlb Q
~ H13
tilo H„ ~ n ~Building~B _
L ~
4 ~
rn - - ~
~
0 ti16 / 1 ,
GO
7L7 L7 ~
~s-~---- _ _ 0.F ~ ILI ,
~ @
o~ ,do ~B 2`~ ad, 00 rn ° ~
H17 MtE 19 N3 - N71 H32 H23 9'F
o ~ r a o -
- ~.oCT7 ' ~4~
H24 HIS 6.F O
I I - ~ \
Buildfng A
I Nx7 H:a I r
h119
. ~
~nQ • F
` I J
31 H3 H33 H34 . 35 H3 ~
) L1 j ~
¢a oO9o 0A
~ °
~9ao ~ Naza Hote~' i? Levea Two,
ZEHREN Vail, Colorado „
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - Scale: 1„-_. 50'-0
November 23, 1999
I.0lOR 111~ A\VN. OOIOItAW ~f~ I
TBb~ul~Nml~ fwYNNS~f~~en~
V ,
W_~~~
~
- , Lubby ~
I I oad'n q
a
~ servicc y
Y
_ ^ R an 0 O p O~ o a~o_~~,uaa
~ oR,„a„~ p a",u, o u Q n
• ~ v a n(D nIOD a aL'a~apa ~ U ~
- ~a,~ a0
_ •
O C) C?
O Q 0 o.
~ L c ~ . ~ C3o
s
~ \ ' _ l f 1 n~w~~ <l~ . ~L1o DU~~{~Utoo ' -
r)t ~ L lu~ ;sITi6
~.,.r . ~
.
- -
% fi7 L ) H8 faid ~ 119
T~uildiag A
1412 NU .
i14 r 1 I115 \ ~
~ L1
n o ~i O Cj ,
1116 lil7 }SI8 H19 H20 H21 pa
i
-l \ i \ C \
~ ~ p ~j '
7EI}-0 f~ EN Va~a q u IT ~aza u (~t1 ~~td i? Levd One
AND AssocinTes, iNC. Vaii, Colorado
Scale: 1 50' l)"
'°q' November 23, 1999
r~snmwsiao
m omww'
0 ~ p ~
i 0 Q i
i
_00O~ p o a sn~in
I Q ~p~p-o 0 ~ r
aQ~o~O0
0 0 0°0 0 0 , -~a~~~ o~ ~ ~ •
a ~ p
aQo°a~p
0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
I
~ 1 I ~ I
1 ~ ~s
Below QQ Exodu ~
~ ~ CZL ~ ~ qpm
O gtm
Q ,
~ ~ ~7 nq
~ Q Aecwntlne po. ~
itawl one
o0 ~ .n4
>
~ ,j ~f~C~Q~DC7? ~ ? ? ~ i ~
i Clu ainnTw,o
~ r N
ftml Ofllm
\ 1,. . ~ f
~ ~p H N ZE~--fl I~ E6~ V a aza l! ll ote~ LeQ/eQ ZeD'o
nNO nssocinres, ir4c. Vail, Colorado
""""'"`."'ojm
+n Scale: 1"= 50'-0"
Alavernber 23~ ~ 999 ~
~F
IN{hMHRI 0tl
i
~
, ~
~
; ~e _ e~ :.P,s _ ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~
~
' ~ i
~ . Tre.m+errc ~ I I .
WPT-" I
Salon - ~
I
~ C3
_ ' - - ~obby 0 Pool tiero6la ~ I
~ ~ • , CCD O . ~ I I
e4 F.i~ e.u e-ie v.n r-ie F-19 F.70 F-a c.1 ~I 4 I I
cc-s ~ I L
c.F a
rrkina
• _ ~ L~.~~ _ _ ~ _
ce
r I v.t $ ( I
V-2 f-31 P.70 P39 F-7e f.27 F36 F-15 F-71 F31 F-13 F Il
PI~ L'~ F~13 PJ7 FJ~ f~7! F•76 F-27 F-71 F-34 P40 F-11. I--- ~ I
F•10 ~ I ~
1 C.a
~
F.1 F.7 Pfi n 1 C.I11 F-0 FJ F-] F.7 1'.1 C-11 ~
v
I • \ ~ ~ I ~
. \ \
~ \ \
IN
ZEHREN VaH Maza Gr-iotd ~ ~.~~~o ~o~~,~
nND /~SSDCIATES, INC. Udll, Colorado
uo~txnia . a'n~ . ~mum
Avm4 November 23, 1999 Scale: 1"= 501-0"
nRra~Mmn r~r^--w~m
-I i - -
. . V.IW V.107 V-]] Y.77 V-79 V.7R 11 ~
' _ V.10 . ~1/ f V.71 V.<V I y.3 7 V.2 { ( ~
t I 9.. I I
I V.IO V.75 \'.70 V.JI V'7R
~
v.i
LI 711
' I
y.lUfl u~ v.ian v_te ~ v.e~r ~ v-+i
. ' .
~~.?9 ~ f V'77 ' V'R4
I -
~ V.IA9 V.98-i V-76 I V.67 V.1M1 ~ VJI \'.5 I 11 ~
V.110 V.91 ~ V179 I i V.66 ' V~dS
V-Itl -V.-96 J I
`-I'BU_J I `''6! L I
~ V.II7 V.Y< V-ql V-64 ""47 \'-31 V-8
~ . ~
~ ~I v.n~ v.9s v.az ~ v.u " v~~A ' vau v.v I
Y-114 V.97 Ip+ V-e.~l ' V.E2 V~9 V~
V.IIS V.92 V.511
~.3I II
d
v-iin v.as v.co v v.s~ L v.s-7 v ~ .u~ I I
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
e.ya v.ae v.~-~s9 t .si~f
~f I I I ~
V.B9 ` v.e7 ~ v.se V~s~J v.u v.14 ~ I
L--Jk--_JL---j I
v.an r v.i=~ ~ v.its ~ v.zr 1 v.is ~ I
~iT v ~c ~ I I
~ r-,r--,r-_~
v.iZ,. - V_:z .•.17 ~
F40 F31 c-72 [23 FF~1f JIF-26 ~F-17 F-31 [19 F-311 F-71 [32]F-31 FJI V 111 F-RS \'.57 VS4 .2 J ~ F-IV I / 1 F-bl V' S6 V'`y , L' v.=' ' \'.I I
, ,
r. i e i
F-n 1
IV-IIF i-19 F-48 i-17 1-1E F-47 1-11 F-U F.A3 F-I 1.10 1-39 FJ1 F-ft FF-35
F-IS /
IV.11 Fd0 1-51 F53 1~57 F-54 F.SSfI F.7G F-fl F-5 - F-f') F,, F-61 /J
1 C=
1 FII F.10 1.4 F.R F4 1.6 F-0 FJ FJ F.S F~1 Cd ,
- ~ ~ ~ ~
~
r
~-----r-------' ~ ~ti~
,
G . ~ ~
V~1a Haza Hoted
ZEHIREN ~?Lede[Mnus Two
AND ASSOCIA7E5, INC. Vail' Colorado
Scale:l"=50'-U" '
Novernber 23, 1999
m erq14w1e7 rnxemWao .
~ I.
CIu6
~'h;~~dSCb+r-
flotel
Holel ~ - - - - - ' • . - '_6._m °f~el~ '~fi~.i~~III'3T_' - - - - ' ~ w ~ - I~~n~ml93" 9-41
,-m Y{•'.$?0
4}'i~.iumHt'i-..
~ .~tum-33''SR41 - - -
North Elevation East Elevatiori
a - Z
4~.
- - -7ud e „4, $f:~ro1Qiars~- - - - - - --n~iSH}na,0
4t.~~
mI~ . Lc tl0 1
.SI IIII
4M°~3s s;
West Elevation ' Sout6i Elevation i
I
o 0
ZE~--~ u~ EN M~1o ~ ~ Maza G°`{11~tC~d 4? (~~oo~~long A [EDcedadons
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. VaII, Colorado Scale:t"=50'-0"
~A"" "~O`~ 0D1O'ADO •'a~° November 23, 1999 I
tae>qw)Wf) rnwb>"•N.~qp '
I
_ _ 1
, _ . _ . _ . -u.-,N•°.t+0
tw=
Cluh
clue iuy
aim
~ Cluh
ciub
~ - - -r-1fY1lR' 0
Club CIu6 Holcl
~bWm°iu~.s•- - - -•-tr:ti tYt~E38 ~°VmiAPfi-' 14ate1 -'-OTTt9!!.l~0
Hoiel Hotel llutcl~ Hmcl
$hS::i~rr~-- - - -'-~~`fS`A'F-0 $~:~i1~a~•- .
i9~44'P
Remil Ro~nil
Il
._.~m i
North Elevation East Elevation
Cotirtyard Courtyard
Club
- -~sr~~{?N 0 ~ ~
~Club ' Club
Itmd ~7 -
1 Ciuh
E3
clut Gu6
tmiei ti~oid ch~n - _ m --ch.n ~
~~itma~-•-
~.-'tiY1~4 I
Fm~ci tium~ nocd - Flmd , ~ -
-
nccoun'ins 6er RoutOlice Pn~ ~ere rl Lahb Div d Lobby ~ -
West Elevation South Elevation
Courtyard Courtyai-d
~
Va0 ~ o Nav~lnu~
~~1 ~''~Q~~~~ ~auuQ~ e~ ~~c~~i~c~o~~
ZEo--~ REN
nNO nssocinTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado 5cale: I"= 50'-0°
~.Mw - ~Mm - 1M'' ~ November 23, 1999
~.tabM 11)~ AYVy ~itMN~O ~I W ~
1l1 O~IN1All) lN1~fIqNflOtl
eC:':t~~r.~-- - - - - •
-'.._'-'-.-•-rry~P~WFB
0h:"Airrc'-•- 0h~mrt-- - - - - - - - -
06°t~°kre•- - - - -n.-:~n`t~9k0 $kit'~M,°Sars•-- - -
4 -•-a~'fdt!:30 0M-5 ima•-
? ? . _ _ .Mt!($ 0
- . _ . _ . Ff?$F0
- - - -
North Elevation East Elevation
~
Club Club
cm6
aA - ,
Ftwd
tm«i
ft~i~~ .N~, $F°n'et~a^-- • --n•~A7?3~~
~ Luading Area U Ui~ J
. ~4¢W$ Aetail ~ ~
Aeuil
West Elevation Soutl-i Elevation
G
~
r-u ' ~
T ~E o-~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 D ~ Maza ~ I~ t~,o 0 0 o ~i g Uc~va~ooo~ s
nNO ASSOCIA7ES, iNC. Vail, Colorado
November23,1999 Scale:t"=50'-0"
~.6qX 11)~ AW1~ (YIlfY1~Dp ~~lp
mn~or~uaar i~xM--..tio.o ~
~ Clnb - d Ciub
Club
CIv6 $
Club T:Jii:~:
Chlb Ho;cl CIUL ~ ...Ftalrl '
-Q:M
Ho~cl - Hurcl ~ y~~~ Club Ilnlel'-'
.~J ~
n'., . }lafcl kiohl "v ~ ('lub 17otCl
.--Lw~a ~MIMI
. . Resmwent Luadiug
-0bi`~ 1lca~- - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - • --ir.~~SeP+O
- -
. Spe B.11 rnnm ,I
~ .mm
SPn P-,knvt
North Elevation East Elevatiun
, Courtyard , Courtyard
~
ciun
cros
1. .
c~un
~{i:i~ll)•.~r- ~ Cliib
ttmd ISlL27 Club H-l CIuL
4k~Smar- . • _ -.,.-n.W,'ttik8~0 $~m4rr~~-~ - - - - - -r~y?8~0
Ei l--
-mi
-~'~9lHk0
Iio«<
Hotel Hotel «MO
'~~I ~Aird^-' . D•rveli~b~ ~
5[nLL[ R[SfEllfplll ~ ~
\/Vest Elevafiion Soutli Elevation
Courtyard Cuuolyat-d
~ ~
Z E ~-l R E N Va~ 0 ~ Naza'---bte4 [~a.uo~~luu~~ ~c~~o~u~~
nNO nssocinTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado
~uc~mwva - n~wM~c .
1- AWi, i~rr~~oa November 23, 1999 Scale:
~.0.10M QR(]I~DO It{SO
m IomfHm~~ ~nae~ur..~J~o I
I
I? ~
i
0
_ ~ -
~ i
Gateway Bullding ~ ' - - "
Vall Plaza Hotel -
Building A Vail Vfllage inn
!'hase V
Village Road Elevalion
- - _
m ~ m
~
e - - ~ ~
m• ~ u
e ~ m - o BnA o B
Vail Village Inn I-
Phase III Vail Plaza Hotel ' -
Building B Gateway Bullding
North Frontage Road Elevation
0 ~ Nam ~
~ Ea~ REN V~1~
7L' loite~ ~ ~treet Sect0on5
nNO ASSOCUTES, uNc. , Vail, Colorado
Mnrrtcnv , n.wHU+c. nanina Scelc: 1"= 50'-0"
Novembef23, 1999
tn nraMou-~ -rian7au.~m - - ~
~ ~ ~ Q [17
CTI Club ~
E~ Club
_ X
F,~«~ o ? - I
~.""bY Vail Plaza Hotel Vail Village Inn
- Building B Phase III
Vail Plaza Hotel
Buflding A
Soutf) PIaZa Elevation
r , -
- ~ m
i ~
Vail Viltage Inn Vafl Plaza Hotel Vail Plaza Hnlel
Phase V 9u11ding A euilding e
East !'laza Elevation
~ °
V~100 Naza 'n-'o t e O ~'o Naza Seccttoou~~
~ E H R IE N
Vaif, Co{orado
AND ASSOCIATES, IlJC. ~ Scale:l"=SO'-0" I
November 23, 1999
RIfA1MfUV) I/aOnAN~SOtl - ' '
-
-
~ ~ ~~•y' ~ .~„~„~v~'~ ~~d s~ c,,~~~,~~~y~' _ ~ e~ S ` ~
~l ~ \ ~ ~ !•tu~i \ . D ' ~ T~~_
\ \ 1•m~~~~ 6 ~ \ \ \ 7 O \ ~ 6 '
'~fD
\ ~ I.In~fY ~•]If) 1'L))~ ~ `
1•'jt _ . \ \ 1'I~O)l. " \
~ ~ I ~ \ ~ ~ 1•Yt~ t~ ~
_ I lle`I
~
'11I1
~ \ \ \ \ v \ \ ~ ` \ 21-
~ ••mt $ \ ~ c ~ - ~ - r::~ \ ~ -
13UIldltlg }3\ ~ 1• . " _ ~ ` _ _
~ ~ ~ i i•~~~~ ~ ~ •"a \5 G \ ~ ,L _ ~ -d -
' ~ ` ni~n, ~ ~ _ - i ~,i i•n.i - _ .-r! .ri~~ /
_
_ _ i iw,r ` \ • ~ _ _ _ - -
'
~frl- ~ I~li 1 y ~ 1' 1'll~ift 1• i>) 111ff ^ ~ ` v ~ ' .(•I~A.aI ~
- _ ~e. G ~ ~ \ \ - C) -
~ ef)
. ~ ~ ~ ~ C .I•` / ~ .fii..•
_ _ ~iu._ _ ' ~ \ - ~ ` _ ~ ~ •ien ~-n~r_ - - __l•n f~ _ _
- - « '
~ ms
f-~{
\ `-~..~T Li?:il~~
~ i ~ ~•i
~ O ~ .
Z E o--~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~~1z~1 Hot~~ i [~~oo~~loD~,~ fF-~c~o I~t ~'D~to~ 1i
nr,~ nssocinTES, ir,c. Vaii, Colorado Absolute Heigli
~~amn" Interpolated Contotus
^`°KCO1DfADO ^•tO November 23, 1999
me>mwaar rn~nrmrwiaeo . Sr.dle: l°=SUr_0°
-
~ a \
~ • ~ : , ,
Tv \X
'N'
~ e ae~ ~ v
~ ~ ~ \ ~.~o~ii ~ • ~ m \ Q~~-n ' ~ \ ' _=f-, _ `
~ ~ ~•im.~i ~ ~ _
1...,~
\ , n~~..n ~ i '
~ Bung
\ ~ 'r \ \
I•i~.fl ~ 6 -
j~~~ ' I•lEJ'1 \ ~ \ \ \ - ~ - n ~ _ -a
' j ~ S \ 1•~a ~ ~ - ` _ t~flil _ _ _
R ~.b i i \ \ ~
~ i.~i.n) ~eat
: ~n~.~ •rinei \ ~ \ ~ \ _ - -
~ ~f---/
~-~f .i•n~,~
~ - -
? ~ - ~ _ ~ - ~
_-lylvl •I•1!~ t'1
' ~ _ _ _ _ \ \ ~ ~ ~'~,,y~(~ n'7~~.i _ c•,n.. i .ncsS
- - ru~i ~r~ ~ , - - - -
- vn~~ ~ f ` _ ~ - - - -
~.un•~_ ' ~ ~ ~~•ieri --rie~ ~ J~uu _ _
~
~ r• ..r _ _ ~~~.r
~
1. ' ~n~.~ \ r~H.~ r ~ /nl•1~1'
~ ` ` •(•I6f~~~_ ~f'~l.r - ' -
~ 1.~]) ~ ~ / ~
_ - ~ _ _
~.If~'1~ 1'If)1• ~ - ~~~Y ~ ~
(•11~~- _-_l i~~ ~ ~ . ~I.~~ni~ ~ ~ .
~ . e.o».
- r•
~ ~ ~--r,~r-r-}=1i,., . - - ~ /J ~ .
~
V~1o
0~ Haza ~cte~ iiB~ao~~luu~g ~(lc~ug6~t (~0an 2
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Vaii, Colorado Maximum Heigh?AbovF rrade
""O"°"" - """"1N0'1NR1O1tl November 23, 1999 Interpola[ed Contours
eawt nn evnN, oanuw nuo 5ca1e: 1"= SO'-pu
m en+wmn rwiera+w~ad
; , - u~ l L_J I__ITL-J I____l te&_ ~
- ~ C(l[~? ~
~ - L
`'Ue~vn~ 11~•.il` ' . - . . iJ J ~ ~
P0Ol SP,CIIOIl B-B
uiM. r cm~~~~ c
- ~ UP
.Q1c.cL?Pd~_.
- ' ' ' OW •••n ! Cnmmvn /un~p:r. NS
A,
~ercl~l ~ I 3commnnoni.nirn,9s
~ ~m ~nmim.. ni
~
.
,
. .
Pool Sectioti C-C iT,,,,m !„mP,~,ais ~ ~i•~o~a
U
4Nok('-l,n -
.~LF~L.OJH ~ 1 ~:w~. IT~mmy o~~w~n+7y _
uo~~u~ ii~7•. ~ - .
- r-Mm rW
I. \I 1 mmYJ~ rer nl
~ ow
J
pll
LozL ~
-~~,.~„~~4 •.s-~ - - - . - - . _ . - • - - - a ~
~
i
Pool Section GC DD n,^\~~~ ~
Lctl91L _ ,
- - - .
Pool 5ection L-E Pool Section A-A ~
o Maza ZEo-~REN V~10~ote~ ~
nNO nssoanTes, iNC. Vail, Colorado
NK]TL'CTl1f - MANNNG . IMGRIItf
November 23, 1999
merne~~m~r rnxrM«sw.o
-
- l
, ~ ~ -
i
i
i
i
~ .
i ~
,
i
~ _ _
L ~ _J - ~
~ - - -
~
1 - I ~ ~ • ..:;,.~..--1.,..
, , ,l ~ ~ I I ~ • - - - - - --"°r-- v - - - - ZZ)
~
L
J, - " Crz y '
„ ` \ - - , ; " Mf
~
Ln66y
I
,i
Reslaurani Launge
1 ~
e
.
Lobby r
II A .v_~ __"-_•-1~ ~ _II
~ - o o°a0U0o°~
Rcwit (j I
Thrce Open `C~ U 00
~ I
~ Ha ti4 ~is nh n° U~00()
I I I
, Vai I Road 5outh Frontage Road
~ V° ~
Z E o--~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~ Nam r~otC~~ iZt~~rcet (~u~t~.Sttu~loc~~
AND NSSOCIATES, INC, udll, Colorado
nwnenuu . nueaa • unnnou Scale: 1"= 40'-0 November 23, 1999
r.o.lox iv~ nVwL [Otwnoo ntm
1AlIh7Mf0~5) tAf1~fR~W:pp
, , .
.
,
, . -
;
~
,
,
;
• - , -
.
. , -
- -
~ -
- ~
- ~ , - _
. .
, -
.
_
_
• - _ - . - -
~ - ~
~w _ . .
'
_ _ . , -
. _ , - - -
~ - - - -
~ - - -
-
F~..
.
;
~ . _
_.3 .
~
i'~.. ~i ~ , . . - . c~'•,~no -A- .
~~~~z~ ~ ~ ~ ~'j"'"~ ~ s^ ~"i~.~ ~ . ~ `
, . .
~ i ~ 6 ._......,~_._.,,,.M...._
i~
I L "
Eia1ai~~z~~~G~ .r~F ~~'~t}q kM4 . • ~ i ti ` ~ ~ ~ r ~ia~L.i ~ V I ~ i P'IXF~ ~ ~ j ~~4
GradiugPlan
35' Straightbody/50'Articulated 19'-6" Sport Utility Veiiicle
v_
, , _
~
~ -
, _
- .
- - . . .
~ _ -
-
-
:
x
W-_
i ~z w' .r• L ~ ~"~~'`lr~'.<~` `'I'~"~-~. ~ viy~'T~ i> ,.J.:.~..-~"
Zl`
~ I ~ .
, , ~
~.i
1 N3:. , i : ~ Ct.. . . . . b . i rl ~m~xtiw:..:YWI~i ' , . ~
! . . . . .J t)..1 '
55' Sertiitrailer 45' Coach
Z_ E H R E N
~ ANO LS^oCAT^^5c
Vail Plaza Ho1:el
Loading and llelivery Plan
Vail, ColoraHo
~ November23,1999
- - _ -
i
EE
~
, December 21 Decemher 21
10:U0 a.rn, December 21 December 21
10:00 a.m. 2:00 P.M. 2:00
p.rn.
V1/inter Solstice
~
~
-
March 21/September 23 March 21/September 23 March 21/Septem6er 23 March 21/5eptem6er 23
10:00 a.m. t 0:Q0 a.m. 2:00 .
P.rn 2:00 p.m.
Spring/Fall Equinox
~ -
~
Decernber 21 , December 21 june 21 June 21
12:00 noon 12:00 noon ' 12;00 noon 12:00 noon VVinter Solstice aumrner 5c715tice
VaH Naza Hote~ ~a.qo~ ~tUdy
Z E'H R E N
AND n55UP.lATES, IIJC. Vail, Colorado
Scale:l"=80'-0"
~ec~ . ~m -
i.O DO% I1)I AVOfj Novem6er 23, 1999
(SIIOMiq IIlIO '
7RORIMfC]f> (A%~f~H410p
c r' A'" _
~
~
~
-
o _ I
~
Four Story
o V?A %aza
~ Notel
~ w
Twa Story
~ ~ ~ tloliday
~ House
I
Street Sectiari A
. ~ ~
Average S-et6ack
Three and Four Story Areas rn!~ ~arY
C B A 7hree Story Vail Plaza
r- r r- Noll&Y , ~toftl
Hovse
SCCe@t $ECt10n $ ~ I
a o
Four Story I `
Three 5
Holiday Yail PIa ~ .
Flotcl -
. ~ (
~ Average 5etback
~
~ Three and Four Story Areas Street Section C
~ ~ ~ j
~ z e a-o R E N ~1~ Q Na1 i otd M Setlback Study
a I ANo &McUTes, INC, Vail, Colorado scale: t'=4o'-0^ ~ I
~ •+w~"~•~ NoYenlbet 13, 1999
~n~o[ lA ~ 1
~ .
_ " _ .
4IL
TOWN O.
Department of Communi2y DevelopmenL
:'S South Frontage Road
Vail, Calorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-24511 Q O
MEMOIZANDUM ,
D
To: Town of Vail Desioa Review Board
From: Communit_y Deveiopment Departrnent
Date: Decembe: 1, 1999
_
Re: Vail P1aza Hote] -Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council
In anticipation of appearing before the Vail Town Cotmcil for first reading of an amending ordinance to allow for
the redevelopment of Pbase N of the Vaii Village Inn Special Development District, the applicant has requested a
pre?iminary recommendation from the Design Review Board. ~
R:rsuant to the Town Code, in part, "no person shall building construction or demolition within the corporate iimits
of the Toum unless desim approval has been granied in accordance with Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code." -
Should the Desim Review Board choose to make a prelimu7ary recommendation of approval to the Vaii Town
Council on tbe redevelopment proposal ior the Vaii Plaza Hotel, staff would subgest ±hac the follawing imding and
conditions be made pari of the recorrunendation:
"Upon the preliminary review and consideration ot the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the.Board
finds that the Vail Plaza Hotel will be compatible with existing structttres, the hoteI's surrotwdings and with Vail's
environment. The Board furtl7er finds that che proposal is in compliance wiih the aoplicable provisions of the
Desio-n Guidelines prescribed in T:tle 12, Chapier 11 of :he Town Code and the Vail Village IYlaster Plan & tirban
Desion Considerations. 'Iherefore; the Board recornmends approval of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail
Plaza Hotel. T?ie Board's recommendation of approval carries with it the following conditions:
1. That the appiicani submiis a final Iandscape plan, final off-site ir*mprovements pl•an, and outdoor livhtinL,
plan in accordance with the provisions presc:ibed in the Zoning P.egulat:ons for review and approval offthe
Design P.eview Bourcl.
2. Tnat the applicant suomits a final esterior builciing materials list and calor rendering for review and
approval of the Desi!m Review Boara.
3. '?~hat the applicant submits a comnrehensive sign program proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
4. Tha± the applicant submits a roof-top mechanicai plan prior t o the issuance or a builciing pe:r.ut. All rooi=
top mechanical eauupment shaii be encloszd and screened from public view.
RECYCLEDPAPER
~ Attachment R
~ `
u '
~y ~
TflWN OF Y'AIL ~ Departmenl of Community Development
75 South Frantage Raad '
Vail, Colorado 81657 -
970-479-2I38 ~ O
FAX 970-479-2452 Q O
f MEMORANDUM O
D
To: Town.of Vail Design Review Board
From: Community Development Department
Date: December 1,1999 Re: Vail Plaza Hotei - Preliminary Recommendation to the Vail Town Council
In aniicipation of appear.ing before the Vail Town Council for first reading of an amending ordinance to allow for
the redevelopment af Phase N of the Vail Village Inn Special Development District, the applicant has requested a
preliminary recammendation from the Design Review Board.
Pursuaui to the Town Code, in part, "no person shall building construction or demolition within the corporate limits
of the Town unless design approval has been granted in aecordance with Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code."
, Should the Design Review Board clioose to make a preliminary r.ecommendation of approval to the Vail Town ,
Council on the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, staff would suggest that the foilowing finding and
conditions be made part of the recorrunendation:
"Upon the preliminary review and consideration of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel, the Board
finds r,hat the Vail P1a7a Hotel will be compatible with esisting structures, the botel's stirroundings and with Vai]'s
environment. The Board further tinds that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the
llesign Guidelines prescribed in Title 12, Chapter 11 of the Town Code and the Vail Village Master Plan & Urban
Desigu Cansiderations. Therefore, the $oard recommends approval of the redevelopment proposal for the Vail
Plaza Hotel. Ttze Board's recommendation of approval carries with ii the following conditions:
1. That the applicant submits a final landscape plan, final off-site .improvements plan, and outdoor lig6ting
pian in accordance with the provisions prescribed in the Zoning Regulatians for review and approval of the
Design Review Board.
2. That the applicant submits a final exterior building materials list and color rendering for review and
approval of the DeSign Review Board.
3. That the applicant submits a comprehensive sign probram proposal for the Vail Plaza Hotel.
4. That the applicant submits a roof-top mechanical plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof-
tcp meckianical equipment shall be enclosed and screened from public view.
~
RECYCLEDPAPER
r
• Attachkent L
ylemorandum
To: George Ruther, Senior Special Projects Planner
From: Gree, Hall, Director of Public Works and Transportation
Date: December 9, 1999 Subject: Vail Plaza Hotel - Review of the November 23, 1999 Plans
I have completed my review of the Vail Plaza Hotel and have the following comments and concems. Some
of these are truly comments, which should be corrected as the project prog-esses through the development
process, and others are concems or conditions, which shall be taken care of at the appropriate times in the
process.
Required Plan Corrections
? The scale stated on the site illustrative plan is incorrect, please label correctly.
? Sheet-Level Minus Two, ihe elevation of the ramp from above proceeding to the 6% grade at the
lowest level is not 145' as inciicated.
0 Provide the slope of the parking area in the lowest valet area and the location where the gades
change from 128' to 130'.
? Please show ail access points and doorways to elevators and ballways. Specifically, access to the
elevators in the Level Minus Two, this may cause valet spaces to be eliminated. Access to the small
elevator lobby from the loading berth, and access from the loading berth to the freight elevators. The
esact lbcation of the garage door into the Phase III parking structure. Show the staging area in front of
the frei--ht elevator and how this may impact access to Phase III and the safety of those using the
elevator. Show the location of the trash piclnip.
? The eastside curb alignment of Vail Road is shown per the survey. However, there appears to be one
shot out of line, this causes a jog right at the hotel entry, which doesn't esist. T'he curb moves one foot at this location.
? The widths of Vail Road, the Soufli Frontage Road and East Meadow Drive along with the exact
locations of the curbs of the roundabout and median islands and opposite side of the street will need to
be shown accurately prior to first reading before the Town Council. .
Issues for Discussion
There has been sigiiificant discussion with regards to whether a left-turu lane is required on Vaii Road. The
hotel location as it is presently desi~.med would not have to move if the desire for a let`t-tum is there. A .
pedestrian easement would be required to push ihe walk east to make room for the additional 12' lane.
V irtually all of the landscaping on the east side of the road would be lost. A space of 3' to 11' wide as you
go nonb would esist on the south building and the space would be 8' to 15' along the north building.
The need for a left-turn lane was specifically reviewed and evaluaterl by the traffic consulting firm of
Felsburo, Holt & TJllevig. In the Traffic Report prepared by the consulting engineer; the engineer has'
stated that based upon tr~c projections, vehicles "backing up" into the roundabout traffic would not
a:cur.
A review of the roundabout desim with regards to Vail Road iraffic deternuned that at current volumes,
there is a flow of 32 1 vehicles in the AM pealc hour with a capaciry to take 1501 vehicles and a maximum
queue of 1 vehicle, in the PNI peak flow was 484 vehicles with a capacity to take 1423 vehicles and a
maximurri queue of 2 vehicles.
The roundaoout design allows for a 50°% increase in peak flows with the AIVI havin(y a peak hour flow of
481 vehicles wi[h capacity of 1172 vehicles with a ma:cimum queue of 2 vehicles. The PM peak flow
would be 735 vehicles with a capacity of 1055 vehicles alid a masimum queue of 7 vehicles. This queue
does not impact the enUy into this site.
The Vail Plaza Hotel Traffic Report states the current northbound traffic volume of Vail Road is 695
vehicles. The added trips to Vail Roiid will be approximately 57 trips in and 40 trips out, during the peak
PM period. They also analyzed that the trips were turning in against 900 vehicles verses the 735 trips. As ~
estimated in the future roundabout calculations.
The second issue is that the loading bay requirements for the site were to accommodate the tuming I
maneuvers of a 30' single axle truck, a 45' over the road coach and a 50-foot semi tractor trailer.on-site,
and to additionally to allow a 65' semi tractor trailer to maneuver without impeciing the flow of traffic on
the South F.rontage Road. The applicant has provided an access and maneuverability plan, which illustrates
that the maneuvering of the vehicles takes place partially off-site, in the right-of-way. However, no
backing motions occur across any sidewalks and the traffic flow on the South Frontage Road is not
impeded. Extending the propos~-d South Frontage Road median through this access point.could solve the
~ question of the left turn out for the frontage road access. It would be desirable to at least provide a left turn
pocket east bound somewhere in the frontage road to allow U-tums of passenger cars at a point that is
determined appropriate. This is most likely at Village Center Chute. The landscape median would need to
be extendecl the entire length to ensiu•e this takes place where determined.
This entire access plan on the frontage road will require a Colorado Departrnent of Transportation revised
access permit. The transpoi-tation enb neers at CDOT have the authority to decide how the access funetions.
ReQuired Improvements and Conditions .
? The required improvements for this development are a 6' heated paver walkway from the east property
line of the SDD to the Gateway Building. In addition any revisions to the curb will require new curb
and gutter and modifications or additions to the storm sewer system. 'I1ie extension of Village-style
street Iights is also requu•ed. Any necessary modifications to utilities, landscaping, irrigation systems and required retaining walls shall be the responsibility of the developer. The walkway will be
delineated in pavers across the driveways behind the cross pans.
? Frontage Road landscape medians to include curb and a tter, concrete unit paver aprons, any masonry
rock walls, plant material, bedding mix to TOV specifications, and irrigation system and water '
connections and sleeves.
? Improvements to Vail Road include a heated 8' paver walkway from the Gateway BuiIding property to
East Ivleadow Drive. All additional improvements to allow, for this to take place as similarly as stated
above for the frontage road are also the responsibility of the developer.
? In addition, adding curb, ;iirier and a o' concrete walk from the east property line of the SSD to and
around the curb return of Village Center Chute on the South Frontage Road. Any modifications to the
drainage system to accomplish this work are considered the requirement of the curb. Work such as
retainnag walls and utility znodifications are the responsibility of the Town of Vail. o Details of ihe improvements from Vail Road to the west edge of the Phase I building (Base 1Vlountain
Sports) along with the improvements of the bus stop along East Ivleadow Drive are as follows a heated
paver walkway attached to the street and bus stop along with all modifications to drainage, utiliues,
retaininQ wa11s, drainage systems, irrigation, landscape modifications street lighting and any adjacent
property improvements impacted.
? The oran-e street lights esisting along ihe entire length of East Meadow Drive shall be changed to the
ViilaQe-style street Lght fixiure. This instaliation shall be completed by the developer_
C A final ffading and drainage plan be nrepared and all drainage systems carrying runoff from public
~ight of ways require drainage easemenis. The tmal ~ading plan will have all ~ades to the tenth of a
foot .
? A final landscape plan showing sivht distances, snow stora-e areas, and ail esisting vegetation
' impacted. '
? The entire buildinq will require aouttering system, heat tape and piping to the storm sewer.
? That snow sheddin~ is addressed"for the entire building. -
??'he pedestrian walks along Vail Road and the other pedestrian mews are established as public
pedestrian easements.
? Complete civil-engineered plans are revieweci and approved by the Town Engineer prior to submitting
plans for the building permit.
? A11 one-way cross over lanes shall be 18' in width and all two-way cross over lanes shall be 24' in
width. This affects approximately four compact and seven valet spaces. ,
? The two-way drive aisle at the porte-cochere is only 20' in width between the columns. The valet
spaces drawn ace only 16' in lengh. If full-size vatet spaces are established as required, the dh-ive lane
width is further reduced down to.17'. To resolve the eonflict the parku7g spaces need to be removed. -
? Ttie slopes of the heated and enclosed drive aisle ramps are allowed to be a maximum grade of 16%.
An engineered-stamped desiL
71 of the drive aisle is required prior to final DRB approval.
0 The three Phase V parking spaces south of the hotel are not practical. To enter the first to requires the
driver to use the hotel porte-cochere as a roundabout. The one angled parking space, when drawn to
the proper dimensions (9'x 19') reduces the drive aisle to the structure by 1'. This conflict could be ,
resolved by movinb the parking space closer to the Phase V building. However, the proposed 4 foot
wide wa]k in this mew is then reduced to three feet in width wben adjusted. The reduced width is too
narrow ne:ct to the building. The parking space desip must be revised.
? The curb returns into and out of the site will need to be revised to allow proper turning and
nianeuvering.
? The south retum onto the site shall have a 15'radius.
? The north return out of the site shall have an 8' radius.
? The South Frontage Road exit shall be widened to accommodate the 65' semi tractor trailer. This
requires an adjustment to both sides of the drive aisle and to the landscape island.
?'The brick paver sidewalk along Vail Road shall be 8' in width.
~
EA,S-T VILLAGE HO1_Y1EOWNERS ASSOCIA.TION, LNC. ~
Ofticers: President - Bob Galvin Secreary - Gretta Parks Treasurer - Patrick Gramm
D'uectors - Judith Ee:koNvitz - Dolph Brdoewater - Ellie Cauikins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder
To: Town of Vail - Town Council .
From: Jim Lamont, EYecutive Director
Date: December 7. 1999
RE: Vail Plaza Hotel Special Development District Amendment Proposal
The Association's primary concerns with the proposal fall within tZVO jeneral categories.
o Impact upon the public traffic circulation and Vail Village loading & delivery s_ystems.
o Compliance with prior conditions of approval, Vail Village Master Plan, underiying zone district
requirements, and the relationship with adjacent properties and improvements
The following is recommended to provide sufficieat information to make an informed recommendation to the Town
Council with respect to these prima.ry concerns. These reconnmendations will have consequences for setbacks, pedestrian
and vehicular circulation, building heights, off site unpacts and related matters.
1. The Town of Vail should commission an analvsis bv a traffic-consultin firm to provide a second and
indenendent opmion with respect to traffic circulation and safetv issues for the Main Vail roundabout Vail Road
and the_South Frontaze Road. The analvsis should provide desian options to resolve traffic circulation and safetv
issues resultina from increased densities approved for Vail Vxlla2e
The South Frontage Road and Vail Road are critical vehicular links to Vail Village and its surrounding residential
neighborhoods. Currently on Vail Road, during periods of high traffic, vehicles turning mto pnvate driveways can
quickly cause the back up of north and southbound traffic. This circumstance causes particular concem for the
consequences affecting the main Vail roundabout. Approving minimum building setbacks along Vail Road removes any
firture option to xnake improvements to provide for an efficient and safe traffic flow as well as for an aesthetically
)ealing presentation to the Vail Road corridor. Allowing large trucks, buses and cars eYiting the Phase I parldng
.,ructure and the site's loading & delivery ternunal to excit by crossing against east bound traffic on the South Fxontage
Road; near the east ezit of the Main Vail roundabout, creates the potential for an unnecessary tra.ffic hazatd.
2. An independent analvsis should be condncted to determine the size and-confturation of necessarv
facilities to be orovided an the Vail Plaza Hotel site and methods of aopropriate compensadon requiretl to mitiaate
off srte impacts upon the Vail tiillal4e loadmQ and dehverv svstem
The growth in the visitor population due to increases in, (recently approved or under consideration) densities for
Vaii Village and Lionshead will result in a greater demand upon the loading and delivery system for Vail Village. The
zegative aspects of the current loading and delivery systezn are adverse to the economic and environmentai well being of
Vail Village and its surroundi.ng residential neighborhoods. The mitigation of the cumulative e-f"tects from redevelopment
-esulting from increases in the visitor population from the Vail Plaza Hotel and other similar properties is anticipated
:hrough regulatory provisions providing for the mitigation of off site impacts upon the loading and delivery systern. 3, The intended interconnectnon between the Vail Plaza Hotel and the earlier phases of the Special
Develotament Distnct, of the parlana structures noints of access and circulation routes alona with accompanvina
'epairs and imnrovements shoula be reauired or adequate measures to mitiaate the resultinQ effects should be
)rovided bv the applicant and confirmed bv an independent consnltant
The lack of the interconnection of interior circulation routes between earlier phases of the Special Development
)istrict and the proposed Vail Plaza Hotel places an inappropriate and unnecessary burden upon traffic circulation on
idjacent public nght-of-~,vays. Further, the canfiwration causes the unsuitabie mixing oftypes of vehicies, reducing the
:fficiency and safe operation of on-site loading and delivery facilities. The interconnecuon of these routes and points of
Lccess was anticipated and provided for in the design and construction of the earlie: phases. No agreements restrain or
)reempt the Totivn from requirina these interconnections.
4. A summarv of comaiiance c:-iteria imoosed uoon earlier ')hases of the Suecial Develonment District and
°port on the deareP of deviation anu the iustifica[ion thereof irom these c-iteria should be provided to the Town
ancil.
The complianc.- criteria, such as the view corridor defined in the initial Special Develapment District established
br the site; we:e unposed upon the former.owners and adjacent property owne:s. The rational and crite:ia applied ±or the
Post Office Boz 233 Vail, Colorado 81653
'I'e?ephone: (970) 327-3630 MessaggQ/F?X: (970) 327-5856
setting aside of the compliance criferia is a matter of fair, consistent, and equal treatment for former owneis, adjacent
propetty owners and all propezty owners in similar circumstances. Compliance criteria include documeats and decisions
with respect to various phases of the Special Devclopment District, the Vail Village Master Plan, the underlying zane
district and callateral revuire.nents placed on adjacent properties. The documentation of changes and amendments to the
Special Developmeni Districi has be-n regorte3. However, the deviation or negation of campliance criteria has not been
justified aa to wanante3 changes in conditions, resutting effects, and the public purgose served.
The Association has given testimony to the Planning and Environmental Commissian regarding the foregoing matters
within the context of the work sessions they have conducted with respect to this item. As the authority to initiate ac2ion
on several of these matters falls outside the jurisdiction of the Commission or staf~ they are presented to Council so as to
respec: its nerd to give timely consideration to the concems raised by the Association It is respectfully suggested that
because there are a sufficient number of new Town Council members, certain reports by consultants and staff with respect
to this proposaJ should be presented and considered as a qualifier to fmalizmg the Council's advisory comments. The
forme: Cauncil, due to the pending expiration of their terms, deznurred on mal:in& advisory comments, sesming to choose
. instesd to forward the responsibility to the newIy elected Councii. The Association is prepared to give additional
. supporting testimony with respect to these matters.
~
Vail Plaza Hote! Level 6 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Leve16
Gross Square Footage 8,044.00
Dwelline Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Dwelling Unit (upper level) 2,053.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 42 (lJpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 43 (Upper I.evel) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 44 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 45 (Upper Level) 648.00 108.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 47 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 48 (iJppet Levell 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Sub-Total Club 4,718.00 843.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 12.00
Corridor (public) 0.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Maid 0.00
Core (stair) 0.00
Mechanical (rooftop) 222.00
Sub-Total Area 372.00
Dwelling Unit Net 2,053.00
Club Unit Net 4,718.00 -
Other Net =00
Total NM 7,143.00
NeUGross Difference 901.00 89%
Page 1
Vail Plaza Hotel Level 5 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Level 5
Gross Square Footage 16,146.00
Dwelline Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Dwelling Unit (lower level) 3,446.00 340.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 34 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 35 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 36 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 37 (LJpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 39 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 42 (Lower Level) 913.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 43 (Lower Level) 979.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 44 (Lower Level) 486.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 45 (Lower L.evel) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 46 (F7at) 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 47 (Lower Level) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 48 (Lower L.evel) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club 9,801.00 735.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 32.00
Other Areas Area
Corridor (public) 1,592.00
Core (elevator, mech. shaft) 151.00
Maid 0.00
Core stair 0.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 1,743.00
Dwelling Unit Net 3,446.00
Club Unit Net 9,801.00
Other Net 1,743.00
Total Net 14,990.00
Net/Gross Difference 1,156.00 93%
Page 2
i
+ . .
! Vail Plaza Hotel Level 4 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
~ Level4
I Gross Square Footage 26,763.00
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 20 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 21 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 22 (Upper L.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 27 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 28 (Upper I.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 29 (Upper L.evel) 1,313.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 34 (Lower Level) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 35 (I.ower I.evel) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 36 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 37 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 38 (Flat) 984.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 39 (Lower L.evel) 980.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 40 (F7at) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 100 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2_00 2_00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club 14,390.00 1,215.00 25.00 21.00 3.00 48.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area
Unit Type A 372.11 18.00 6,698.00
Other Areas Area
Corridor (public) 2,912.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Maid 344.00
Core stair 269.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 3,675.00
Club Unit Net 14,390.00
Accommodation Net 6,698.00
Other Net 3.675.00
Totai Net 24,763.00
NeUGross Difference 2,000.00 93%
Page 3
Vail Plaza Hotel Level 3 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/ 13/99
Level 3
Gross Square Footage 32,877.00
Club Units
Unit e Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 17 (F7at) 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 20 (L.ower Level) 561.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 21 (Lower Level) 1,088.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 22 (Lower Levei) 995.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 23 (F7at) 991.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 24 (Flat) 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 27 (Lower L.evel) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 28 (Lower Level) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 29 (I.ower Level) 969.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club Uuits 16,163.00 1,400.00 30.00 23.00 7.00 60.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area
Unit Type A 365.54 26.00 9,504.00
Other Areas
Maid 342.00
Corridor (public) 4,359.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Core stair 360.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 5,211.00
Totals
Club Net 16,163.00
Accommodation Net 9,504.00
Other Net 5.211.00
Total Net 30,878.00
NetlGross Difference 1,999.00 94%
Page 4
i Vaii Plaza Hotel Leve12 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
~ 961070.00 12/13/99
~
i Level2
j Gross Square Footage 37,857.00
Club Units
Unit Tvpe Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 8(Flat) 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 11 (F'lat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 14 (Ffat) 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1.222.00 40_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club Uoits 13,966.00 1,235.00 27.00 17.00 10.00 54.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Ke s Total Area
Unit Type A 364.59 34.00 12,396.00
Other Areas -
Maid 344.00
Corridor (public) 4,342.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Core (stair) 367.00
Rooftop Deck 4.114.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 9,317.00
Totals
Club Net 13,966.00
Accommodation Net 12,396.00
Other Net 9.317.00
Total Net 35,679.00
NebGross Difference 2,178.00 94%
Page 5
Vail Plaza Hotel Level 1 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Level 1
Gross Square Footage 44,623.00
Club Units
Unit Tvpe Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 3(Flat) 1.237.00 95_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club Uoits 3,822.00 319.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 14.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area
Unit Type A 353.10 21.00 7,415.00
Retail Area
Retail Three 605.00
Retail Four 0.00
Sub-Total Retail 605.00
Restaurant Area Occ. Factor Occunants
Main Restaurant (Buffet) 2,155.00 18.00 119.72
Specialri Restaurant 1.718.00 25_00 68_72
Sub-Total Restaurant 3,873.00 188.44
Lounee Area Occ. Factor Occupants
I.ounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12
Other Areas
Corridor (public) 5,795.00
Kitchen/Service 6,444.00
Truck Dock/Auto Circ. 10,501.00
Restrooms 589.00
Maid 192.00
Core (elevator) 275.00
Core stair 466.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 24,262.00
Totals
Club Net 3,822.00
Accommodation Net 7,415.00
Retail Net 605.00
Restaurant Net 3,873.00
L.ounge Net 1,228.00
Other Net 24.262.00
Total Net Area 41,205.00
NeUGross Difference 3,418.00 92%
Page 6
~ Vail Plaza Hotel Leve10 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
~ 961070.00 12/13/99
Leve10
Gross Square Footage 51,428.00
Retail
Retail One 1,702.00
Retail Two 1.740.00
Sub-Total Retail 3,442.00
Lobby Bar Area Occ. Fact. Occu .
Lobby Baz 674.00 25.00 26.96
Lobby Area Occ. Fact. OcCUp•
Lobby 2,237.00 30.00 74.57
Administration
Front Desk 2,202.00
Accountine 1,570.00
Total Administration 3,772.00
Saa - Men's/Workout
Men's Lockers/Facilities 3,019.00
Treatment 2,447.00
Deck 1,392.00
Exercise/Workout 1,686.00
Sub-Total Spa 8,544.00
Conference Area Occ. Factor Occuoants
Main Ballroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93
Pre-convene 2.485.00 7.00 355.00
Sub-Total Conierence 9,489.00
Service Areas 6,318.00
Exterior Circulation
Covered Ramp (North) 1,008.00
Covered Auto Entry (West) 5,772.00
Uncovered Entry (West) 1,696.00
Auto Ramp (South) 978.00
Pedestrian Access (East) 814.00
Total 10,273.00
Other Areas
Restrooms 589.00
Core (elevator) 275.00
Core (Stair) 568.00
Corridor(Publicl 3,740.00
Totai Other Areas 5,172.00
Parkine Provided
Valet Spaces 5.00
Page 7
?
~ Vail Plaza Hotel Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
I
Totals
Retail Net 3,442.00
Sar Net 674.00
Lobby Net 2,237.00
Administration Net 3,772.00
Spa Net 8,544.00
Conference Net 9,489.00
Service Net 6,318.00
Exterior Circulation Net 10,273.00
Other Net 5.172.00
Total Net 49,921.00
NedGross Difference 1,507.00 97%
Page 8
Vail Plaza Hotel Level -1 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Level Minus One
Gross Square Footage 57,696.00
Spa Area
Women's Lockers/Facilities 3,116.50
Treatment 2,853.00
Deck Area 6,266.00
ExerciselWorkout 1,246.00
Pool Area 2,774.00
Sub-Totaf Spa 16,255.50
Confereuce Area Occ. Factor Occuaants
Breakout 3,364.00 15.00 224.27
Pre-canvene 2.485.00 7.Q0 355.00
Sub-Total Conference 5,849.00
Service 7,971.00
Other Areas
Mechanical 0.00
Corridor(Public) 2,328.00
Core (elevator) 275.00
Core (stair) 568.00
Public Restrooms 589.00
Sub-Total 3,760.00
Parking Provided SDBCes Area Area/Soace
Valet Spaces 7.00
Parking Spaces (Full Size) 41.00
Parkine Spaces (Compact) 11_00
Sub-Total Parldng 59.00 21,498.00 364
Totals Area
Other Areas Net 3,760.00
Spa Net 16,255.50
Conference Net 5,849.00
Service Net 7,971.00
Parking and Ramp Net 21.498.00
Total Net 55,333.50
NeUGross Difference 2,362.50 96%
Page 9
i
!
Vail Plaza Hotel Level -Z Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
I Level Minus Two
~ Gross Square Footage 53,524.00
i
I Other Areas
Mechanical 0.00
Corridor (public) 225.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Core stair 285.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 660.00
Area
Valet Spaces 125.00
Puking Spaces (Full Size) 65.00
Parkina Snaces (Compact) 2.00
Sub-Total Parldng 192.00 51,462.00 268.03
Totals Area
Other Net 660.00
Parldng and Ramn Net 51.462.00
Total Net 52,122.00
NeUGross Difference 1,402.00 97%
Page 10
Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Dw¢Ilin¢ Units Total Area Park. Factor Park. Rea'd
Dwelling Unit 1 5,499.00 >2000 2.50
Club Units Total Area Factor Saaces
Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 500Q000 2.00
Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 6(F7at) 1,193.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 500Q000 2.00
Club Unit 8(F7at) 948.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit I 1(Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Ciub Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1,222.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 500K2000 2.00
Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 1,351.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit21 (Two Level) 1,878.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 22 (Two Level) 1,785.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 23 (Flat) 1,983.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit24 (Flat) 1,108.00 500Q000 2.00
Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 27 (Two I.evel) 1,769.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 28 (Two Level) 1,769.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 2,282.00 >2000 2.50
Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 34 (Two L.evel) 1,327.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00
Club i7nit 37 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Uait 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 1,794.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 1,727.00 500<2000 2.00
Ciub Unit 43 (Two Level) 1,793.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 44 (Two [.evel) 1,300.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 45 (Two Level) 1,161.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 500<2000 2.00
Ciub Unit 47 (Two Level) 814.00 500Q000 2.00
Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 500Q000 2.00
Total Club Parldng 64,094.00 96.50
Page 11
Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/ 13/99
Accommodation Units Area Kevs S aces Factor
Total Acc. Units 36,013.00 99.00 75.61 0.76
Restaurant Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Soaces
Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44 1:8 seats 23.56
Lounee Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Soaces
Total Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 1:8 seats 6.14
Retail Area Factor Suaces
Total Retail 4,047.00 1:300 sq. ft. 13.49
Conference Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor S aces
Main Ballroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93 1:16 seats** 29.18
Bteakout 3,364.00 15.00' 224.27 1:16 seats** 14.02
Total Required Saaces
Total Dwelling Unit 2.50
Total Club 96.50
Total Accommodation 75.61
Total Restaurant 23.56
Total Lounge 6.14
Total Retaii 13.49
Conference 43.20
SDD Parldng Required (phases 1.2.3.5) 149.68
Sub-Total Parldng 410.67
Mixed Use Reduction {10%) -41.07
Total Parlung Reqaired 369.61
Total Parldng Provided 366.00
Parkeng Difference -3.61
ParkinQ Provided Full Size Compact vatet Total
Existing SDD spaces to remain' 112 0 0 112
Level Zero Pazking 0 0 5 5
L,evel Minus One Pazking 41 11 7 59
Levei Minus Two Parkin¢ 65 0 125 190
Total Parlting Provided 218 11 137 366
Percentage 60% 3% 37% 100%
* SDD Parldne Reauired (nhases1.2,3.5)
Existing SDD Spaces 112
SDD Parking Deficit 75
Sub-Total (Current Requirement) 187
Previouly Applied Reduction- (2.5%) 191.68
Currently Dedicated Phase 4 Spaces -42
Total SDD Parldng Required (phases 1,2,3,5) 149.68
*"assume 50% internaUpublic transportation/pedestrian haffic - breakout use by ballroom occupants
Page 12
I Vail Plaza Hotel Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
i
i Dweiline Units Unner Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows
Dwelling Unit 1. 2,053.00 3,446.00 5,499.00 340.00 4.00 4.00 10.00
Club Units UDDei Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows
Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 0.00 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 0.00 1,237.00 95.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 6(F'lat) 1,193.00 0.00 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 0.00 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 8(F7at) 948.00 0.00 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 0.00 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit i l(Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 0.00 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 0.00 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1,222.00 0.00 1,222.00 40.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 0.00 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 0.00 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 0.00 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 790.00 561.00 1,351.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club L}nit 21 (Two Level) 790.00 1,088.00 1,878.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 22 (Two Level) 790.00 995.00 1,785.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 23 (Flat) 991.00 0.00 1,983.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 24 (Flat) 1,108.00 0.00 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 0.00 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 27 (Two I.evel) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 28 (7'wo Level) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 1,313.00 969.00 2,282.00 147.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00
Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 0.00 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 34 (Two Leve]) 814.00 513.00 1,327.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Ciub Unit 37 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 814.00 980.00 1,794.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 814.00 913.00 1,727.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 43 (Two Level) 814.00 979.00 1,793.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 44 (Two L.evel) 814.00 486.00 1,300.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 45 (Two Level) 648.00 513.00 1,161.00 108.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 0.00 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 47 (Two Level) 814.00 992.00 1,806.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 992.00 1.806.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
48 Total Club Units 48,061.00 15,041.00 64,094.00 5,953.00 110.00 87.00 22.00 218.00
Page 13
Vail Plaza Hotel Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/ 13/99
ACCOmmodatlon UIIits Room Area Rooms Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows
Total Acc. Units 363.77 99.00 36,013.00 0.00 99.00 99.00 0.00 198.00
Residential Totals 105,606.00 0.00 213.00 190.00 22.00 426.00
Restaurant Seatine Area Occ. Factor Seats
Main Restaurant 2,155.00 18.00 119.72
Specialtv Restaurant 1.718.00 25_00 68_72
Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44
Lounee
Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12
Lobby Bar 674 25 26.96
Conference Facilites SeaNna Area Occ. Factor Seats
Main Ballroom 7,004 15 467
Breakout 3,364 15 224
Pre-Convene 4,970 7 355
Total Convention 15,338
Sna
Level Zero 8,544.00
Level Minus One 16 55.50
Total 24,799.50
Retail
Retail One 1702
Retail Two 1740
Retail Three 605.00
Retail Four 0.00
Total Retail 4,047.00
Adminstration 3,772.00 -
Page 14
Vail Plaza Hotel Area. SummarY Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 ' 12/13/99
-
Pro¢ram Area Level -2 Level -1 Level 0 Level 1 Leve12 Level 3 Leve14 Leve15 Level 6 Total
GrossArea 53,524.00 57,696.00 51,428.00 44,623.00 37,857.00 32,877.00 26,763.00 16,146A0 8,044.00 328,958.00 ,
Dwelling Unit , 3,446.00 2,053.00 5,499.00 '
Club Unit 3,822.00 13,966.00 16,163.00 14,390.00 9,801.00 4,718.00 62,860.00
AccommodationUnit 7,415.00 12,396.00 9,504.00 6,698.00 36,013.00
Retail 3,442.00 605.00 4,047.00 Lobby 2,237.00 2,237.00
Restaurant 3,873.00 3,873.00
IoungelBar 674.00 1,228.00 1,902.00 '
Conference 3,364.00 7,004.00 10,368.00
Pre-Conviene 2,485.00 2;485.00 4,970.00
Kitchen 0.00
Food and Bevetage 0.00
Front Office 2,202.00 2,202.00
Sales/Cater. (multi-use) 0.00
Accounting 1,570.00 1,570.00
Executive Office 0.00 -
Receiving/Storage - 0.00 Personne] (office) 0.00
Service Areas 7,971.00 6,318A0 6,444.00 20,733.00
Iaundry 0.00
Housekeeping 0.00 ,
Engineering 0.00
Mechanical (Plant) 0.00
Mechanical (Rooftop) 117.00 222.00 339,00
Spa (Lockers) 3,116.50 3,019.00 6,135.50 1
Spa (Treatment) 2,853.00 2,447.00 5,300.00
Poo! I?, ck 5,2 55 . 0 C 1,392.0~ ' 1,558.00
Pool Area 2,774.00 2,774.00
Exercise Roams 1,246.00 1,686.00 2,932.00
Carridor(public) 225.40 2,328.00 3,740.00 5,795.00 4,342.00 4,359.00 2,912.00 1,592.00 0.00 25,293.00 ,
. Cortidor (service) 0.00
Core (elwator) 150.00 275.00 215.00 275.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 151.00 150.00 1,726.00
Core (stair) 285.00 568.00 568.00 466.00 367.00 360.00 269.00 0.00 0.00 1,883.00 .
Parking(spaces,ramp) 51,462.00 21,498.00 10,273.00 4,114.00 87,347.00 Club Unit Storage Area 0•00
Restrooms/CoatslEtc. 589.00 589.00 589.00 1,767.00 '
Laading Dock 10,501.00 10,501.00
Service Srorage 0.00
Maid (Satellite) 0_00 0.00 0.00 192.00 344.00 342.00 344.00 0.00 0.00 • l.aza.oo
Sub-Total Net Areas 52,122.00 55,450.50 49,921.00 41,205.00 35,679.00 30,878.00 24,763.00 14,990.00 7,143.00 312,151.50
Cttoss-Net (wall) Area 1,402.00 2,245.50 1,507.00 3,418.00 2,178.00 1,999.00 2,000.00 1,156.00 901.00 16,806.50 Gross-Net FaCtor 97°/a 96% 97% 92% 94% 94% 93% 93% . 89°/a 95%
~ e
Page l5
, . '
~
, ~ - - - _ Attachitent J
. . _ . _ . - -
M j
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Vail Plaza Hotel
Prepared for:
Zehreri & Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 1976
Avon, CO 81620
Client Contzict: Mr. Timothy R. Losa
Prepared by:
Felsburg Hoit & Ullevig
Greenwood Corporate Plaza
7951 E. Maplewood Avenue, Suite 200
Engiewood, CO 80111
303/721-1440
Engineer: Hoily A. Hefner
. Project Engineer: Chris J. Fasching, P.E.
FHU Reference No. 98-174
September, 1998
- f,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pa4e
- I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................1
A. Land Use,-Site and Study area Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
B. Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
II. PROJECTED.TRAFFIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
A. Trip Generation and Design'Houriy Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
B. Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
C. Year 2015 Projected Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
III. YEAR 2015 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
A. 8ackground Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
•
B. Total Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
APPENDIX A - TRAFFIC COUNTS ~
APPENDIX B- EXISTlNG CONDITIONS LOS .
APPENDIX C- YEAR 2015 BACKGROUND COND(TIONS LOS
APPENDIX D- YEAR 2015 TOTAL CONDITIONS LOS
' " -
i
LtST OF FIGURES
PaQe
1 . Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Site Plan . . . . . . . .
.................................3
3. tstimated Existing Winter Cond'itions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
_ 4. Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Year 2015 Background Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
_ 7. Year 2015 Total Traffic Conditions . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
'
LIST OF TABLES
1. Existing Trip Generation Estimal:es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
- 2. Proposed Trip Generation Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
~ -
~ - - _ - -
. ~ -
1. INTRODUCTION
A. Land Use, Site and Study area Boundaiies
Zehren and Associates, Inc. is proposing the Vail Piaza Hotef development to be located on the
southeast corner of Vai! Road and the South Frontage Road in Vail, Colorado. This
development will be replacing three existing buildings with one building. The site location is
shown in =igure 1. The existing three buifdings consist of a total of 41,643 square teet. The
proposed deevelopment will consist of a total of approximately 150,000 square feet of various
uses including accommodation units, a restaurant, a lounge, a spa, and retail spac•e:
The proposed development will have one main access onto the South Frontage Road. The
main access will serve as the entrance to the four level parking garage. A second access.east
of the main access, will be used for most deliveries. The site plan is shown in Figure 2. The
impacts of the project traffic at the site access points and the roundabout south of I-70 are
presented in this report.
The purpose of this report is to address the projected traffic impacts associated with the Vail
Plaza Hotel development proposal, and to identify any roadway or traffic control improvements
required as a result of these impacts.
B. Existing Conditions .
The existing conditions in the vicinity of the project site are illustrated in Figure 3. Currently
there are two accesses to Vail Plaza Hotel site. The main access is on the South Frontage
Road and the second access is on Vail Road. The South Frontage Road runs east/west
through Vail with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH adjacent to the site. Vail Road runs
north/south from the roundabout intersection with the Frontage Road providing access to
several hotels. Vai! Road is primarily used for local access south of Vail Plaza Hotel.
The roundabout is located approximately 115 feet west of the main entrance to Vail Plaza
Fiotel. Most of the site traffic currentfy uses the roundabout as does traffic oriented to/from
.I-70.
Since Vail is a ski resort, winter traffic volumes have typically been higher than summer
volumes. Traffic counts were cotiected during the week of August 17, 1998, and these
counts were used to estimate winter numbers based on 1990 data collected during the winter
and summer. The estimated existing winter traffic voiumes for the study area are shown in
Figure 3(the raw count data are shown in Appendix A). As indicated, the South Frontage
Road east of the roundabout carries approximately 3000 vehicies during the winter PM peak - hour. The volumes at the two accesses were calcufated by estimatin-c trip generation for the
existing buildings.
. ~
~ FELSI3U[t(:,
t I U L"f' 6c
ULLEVIC
I-70
Fronta e Aoad
J ;I
~
,
733 r,
a
~
,
i
;
~
Figure 1
~ -
North Vicinity Map
Vsil Plasa Holel 98• 174 8/21/88
,
I
. FELSI3URC
110 L T &
ULLEVIG
i
Frontage Road
I .
,
~ -
- ~ - -
-
,
~ - - -
~
~
: -
~ _
- ' -
, - - - _ ~
,
~'j! 1 ! l. ' ~ , ; I~ I I i ~ ;
11~ . o I
ROD Q~ J~~
~ r I I
• ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ V > ~ ~
j ~ ~ ~ II ~ 1 ~ I I
v ~
- _
.
,.~~1....1....~1_..I. . ~ ~ I....I._.
I ` ` I I
~
~ .GO'11 ~ 1 l-1 ~I~ ~J 1'u
~
~{8~N
- o
0
l
I
` r
~ . Figure 2
Site Plan
North
, Vdi Plus Hotel 98•174 0/21/98
~
: Ss;x
~
i 44
{ . . U4i
~ FELSBURG
(4110L,r &
ULLEViG
N ~
w ~ • ~
610 ~ 2r2o 625 ~ JL
•
~ l(
.
A (overall roundabout LOS)
.~1120 1785 ' -4- 1785
F- 10 I ~
1225-3.
- 1315 ~ ;
` N co I
A ~ s
&
A ~ n
I.~
;
a
( '1 13 ~
+y
. , ~
~
w
LEGEND
XXX = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volurnes Figure 3
a( = PM Peak Hour Level of Service `n Estimated Existing Winter Conditions
Q -A-- = stop Sign " (MarCh 1998)
~
North
Vell Plezo Hotel 08-174 9126/98
44
~
. .,e: -
. _
' ~
The total peak hour traffic volumes were used as the basis for subsequent LOS (levels of
service) computatians, the results of which are summarized in Figure 3(worksheets are shown
in Appendix C) as is the intersection lane geometrics. Level of service is a qualitative measure
which describes traffic operations. A letter designation ranging from A to F is used as the
measure. A LOS A is indicative of excellent ;-affic operations with very little delay and no
- congestion, whiie a LOS F represents extreme delay and signiTicant congestion.
As shown in Figure 4 the left turn onto ihe South Frontage Road from the main site access
currently operates at a LOS F during the PM peak hour. The left turn into the site from the
South Frontage Road currently operates at a LOS C during the. PM peak hour. All other ~
. movements operate at a LOS B or better during the PM peak hour.
The minor movements to/from the second access along Vail Road currently operate at a LOS
B or better during the PM peak hour. The roundabout currentiy operates at an overall LOS A.
5
~ FELSIlUR(;
(41-10LI" &
ULLEVIG
10% `c20'c
oA/y~ i ~
i
~
~ I
' i
i
~
t
i
I ' .
30%
? '
25%,i i i
, .
~
,
. i
~
(
~
~
~
~
~ Figure 4
0 ~ Trip Distribution
North
v.u Pi.:. Hmei ee• 174 IVzs/ae
II. PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
A. Trip Generation and Design Hourly Volumes
Trip generation equations, as documented in Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Sixth Edition, 1997 were used to estimate the vehicle-trips generated by ihe
_ existing and proposed development. It was assumed that 50 percent of the traffic to/from the
restaurant, lounge, and specialty retail comes from outside while the other 50 percent is
internal (as such, the trip generation associated with these uses was reduced 50 percent).
Table 1 summarizes the trip generation results -with existing conditions.
Table 1
Existing Trip Generation Estimates
,
Land Use - =-AM Peak Hour:' PM Peak Hour Weekday
, >
Buitdin -
]TE
,
Type-
:Gode . Size . Unit In Out Total In Out :Total] In Out Total
Condo/ 230 22 Rooms 3 7 10 7 5 12 64 64 128
Townhouse
Hotel 310 58 Rooms 20 12 32 19 17 36 239 239 478
Restaurant 831 2 1,000's 1 0 1 5 2 7 43 43 86
Sq. Ft.
Drinking ` 836 1 1,000's 0 0 0 3 1 4 13 13 26
Sq. Ft.
Market 852 2 1,000's 16 17 33 F6 15 31 162 162 324 Sq. Ft.
. I Totals I 39 37 76 50 40 90 521 52 i i na~
' Daily Drinking Total from 7 5% of PM Rates
As shown in Table i, the site currently generates approximately 1050 trips per day. The AM
and PM peak hour trip generation is estimated to be approximatefy 75 and 90 trips,
respectively.
TaDle 2 summarizes the trip generation results for the proposed development.
As shown, the proposed development is estimated to generate approximately'3100 trips per
day. The AM and PM peak hour trip generation is estimated to be approximately 175 and 260
trios respectively. App-oximately three times as many trips are projected 'for the proposed
development as compared to the existing uses on the site.
7
a -
- Table 2
Proposed Trip Generation Estimates
Land Use,AM Peak Hour PEE I Weekday
.
Buifding. ITE .
Tyne Code Size tJnit - in Out Total fn In Out Total
Condo/ 230 16 1ooms 2 5 7 5 4 9 47 47 94
Townhouse
Hotel 310 276 Roams 95 60 155 ~ 89 79 168 1] 36 1 136 2272
' Restaurant 831 9 1,000's 3 1 4 22 I 12 34 201 201 402 ,
. Sq. Ft.
I Drinking * 836 4 I 1,000's C) 0 0 14 7 21 69 69 138
Sq. Ft.
lty 814 9 1,000's c~ 6 11 14 14 28 87 g7 174
Sq. Ft.
ECenter
- Totals 104 73 176 144 115 259 1541 1541 3081
` Daily Drinking Total from 15% of PM Rates
B. Trip Distribution
The trip distribution estimates used in this analysis are shown in Figur-e 4. These percentages
are based upon the existing traffic data previously presented (Figure 3). As shown,
approximately 70 percent of the total site traffic is expected to be oriented to and from the
west through the roundabout. Site generated iraffic was assigned to the adjacent roadway
network per these distribution patterns and are shown in Figure 5.
C. Year 2015 Projected Traffic Vo/umes
Background Traffic
Analysis of traffic impacts for a year 2015 scenario requires projecting background traffic
volumes. The projected background traffic was a result of exponentially increasing the
volumes by two percent per year. Year 2015 backgcound traffic volumes and operational
_ conditions are shown in Figure 6.
Tota! Traffic
The total year 2015 traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. These vofumes were determined
by first removing existing site traffic then adding the site generated traffic to the year 2015
background trafsic volumes. As shown, the Frontage Road is projected to carry approximately
4600 vehicles during the PM peak hour in 2015. Trips attributable to the proposed Vail Pfaza
Hotef would comprise approximately 6 percent of the total,
. 8
. FELSDURC ~
(OHOLT &
ULLEVIG,
I
~ •
w ~
r2
0
~88 ,'--44
36 , r
100-4-~
co w
i "Ln
61
. ~
.
i ~
~ ~ ,
. ;
LEGEND I
X(X = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
~ Figure 5
0 ~ Site Traffic Assignment -
Norih ~
Vdl PI.:. HWN 99-171 0/2810e
. ,
.
i
~ FL-LSI3URG i
(411OL'F & I
ULLEVIc;
; i
I I
i
I
~
. I ~
~
N '
8SS ~ t 29, 8~ 5~, ~
~
D (overall roundabout LOS)
2510
~ 1850 2~~--• ~
L,
? / r ~
~i
i
i
LEGEND
XXX = PM Peak HourTrattic Volumes Figure 6~
~ X = PM Peak Hour Level of Service Y8a r 2015 1,
~
0 . Background Traffic Conditions j;
North
i •
Vall Pleze Hotd 88•171 9/26188 3
. r•ELsBuizc
rillOLT &
ULLEVIG
I ~
.
~ - E
o f
I
D (overall roundabout LOS) i
i
?1~gy ~--2570 2570 i
j-- 44
~ 1870 ~ g0~-? ' 1790-? ~ . ~
, oo --1 1( ~
w a
~ ~ )
13
O ;
13
B I;-
r
i
I
,
. ~
. ;
~
LEGEND XXX = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes = PM Peak Hour Level of Service -
= Figure 7
Stop Sign
~ Year 2015
0 Total Traffic Conditions
North n _
Vdl Plaaa Nolel 98•174 9/11198 ,I jI~
.
III. YEAR 2015 TRAFF{C OPE:RATIONS
A. Background Traffic
The peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 6 were used as the basis for subsequent levels
of service computations, _and the results are also summarized in Figure 6(WOrksheets are
shown in Appendix C). The roundabout wili operate at an overall LOS D. However, the only
movements that are fower than LOS B would be the south approach and right lane east
approach. These movements are projected to operate at LOS C and F respectively. The LOS
F from the east movement is a resuit of the high amount of volume turning to the north toward
_ I-70 and the North Frontage Road. ,
B. Total Traffic
The totaf peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 7 were used as the basis for subsequent
- levels of service computations, and the resufts are also summarized in Figure 7(worksheets
are shown in Appendix D). All movements on the roundabout will operate at the same LOS
as the background traffic showed previously with the exception of the south approach which
will operate at a LOS D. The left turning movement into the site (at the main entrance) will
operate at a LOS E and the left turning movement out of the site will operate at a LOS F.
Site generated traffic consists of approximately 1.2 percent of the total traffic entering the
roundabout. Of the right lane east approach the contribution from site generated traffic is
approximately 2 percent. No improvements were used on the roundabout for this analyses.
The main access onto the South Frontage Road included two roadway improvements in the
analyses:
? Provide a"storage" area in the existing median for site outbound left turning vehicles
to safely pass eastbound traffic. A raised island already exists in the median from the
roundabout to the site access providing separation between eastbound and westbound
traffic. Minor modifications would need to be made to the island to provide for a
storage area. With this "safe harbor," left turning vehicles could cross eastbound
traffic in one maneuver and waii: in the storage area prior to merging into westbound
- traffic. With the addition of the storage area the ieft turn movements out of the site
would still remain at a LOS F, however, the defay time for this movement is improved
significantly (more than 25
- ? Construct a right turn deceleration lane into the site for eastbound traffic. This tane is
needed to remove right turns from thru traffic lanes. This is of importance here
because vehicles coming out of the roundabout do not have sufficient reaction time in
the 115 foot distance to slow or stop for a right turning vehicle.
12
Limiting movements to right in/right out or three-quarter movement was considered for the
site's main access. This would require -that vehicles exiting the site desiring to use the Vail
Road intersection with I-70 (which is most of the site traffic) make a U-turn somewhere along
the South Frontage Road. However, there is not a safe place for vehicles to make a U-turn
within a reasonable distance. Therefore, it is recommended to improve the main access so as
to accommodate full movement as safely as possibte which includes a center "harbor" area
and a right turn deceleration lane.
The second access onto the site from the South Frontage Road will be used for de4iveries. Due
to space Iimitations on site, trucks will need to back up onto the site from the Frontage Road.
This snould be done from a separate lane along the south side of the road. The existing right turn lane east of the site should be extended west to the site's deiivery access. The design
of the fane and driveway should accommodate backing trucks to allow no interference with
eastbound though traffic. Physical or barrier sepGration should be incorporated into the design.
' 13 ,
IV. CONCLUSlONS AND RECC)MMENDATIONS
The following highlight the significant fundings and recommendations as a result of this traffic
analysis:
? The total projected trips consist of subtracting the existing 1042 trips from the
proposed 3082 site generated trips.
? Two roadway improvemants will be necessary at the main access onto the Frontage
Road. The first includes modiTication to the center median to provide a storage area
for vehicles turning left out of the site. This wifl allow for a two-step left turn with less detay. The second is an exclusive right turn lane into the site for eastbound traffic.
This exclusive right turn lane will remove turning traffic from the though trafTic ianes
thereby improving safety characteristics.
_ ? The roundabout will not be advErsely affected by the proposed site traffic. The site
traffic will consist of approximat:ely one percent of the total traffic in the roundabout
in year 2015.
? The auxiliary lane east of the site for right turning vehicles needs to be extended west
to the second access. This lane will be used for defivery trucks backing into the site.
This tane and the de(ivery driveway in which it will serve should be designed to allow
backing activity without impactirig the eastbound through traffic. Physical separation
should be considered between the through lane and the auxiliary lane where backing
would be taking place.
' 14
. - - - . _ . ,
APPENDIX A
TRAFF9C COUNTS
P .,01
' post~t` Fax N ote 7672 No.-a PaW--'l 70* S T~
70 - h , L From ~
Lomto^ ~ , l Loartw Dr.Y C.'arge
V
FIX 0 Teleorone o Fai / Tetmme i
~~mY ~ RNUm ~ GaA for uaup
~
COUNAER MEA5URE5, INC.
~ Site'Code ~ 3 ) PA6E: 1
?
N-S Street! MAIN VAtI ROUND-ABOUi / FILE: VAIL
E-W 5 eet_ _
• Direction: Oir 1 DA1E; 8/11/98
- - -
TIME iOTAI I100N I100N 170 VAIIN VAILN VAILS VAILS EFRON EFRON 41fRDN WFRON -
BEGIk CLASSIfIED SLIP RDABT OFL ON Or'F ON OFF ON OFF Ok aFF
1:00 PM 454 14 62 48 103 133 10 73 1I1 155 122 51
1:15 945 18 61 33 103 :53 fl' 84 145 151 82 79
1:30 1009 15 68 38 43 156 103 1D5 114 116 133 63
1:45 910 14 69 44 98 151 SE 61 139 120 106 68
HR TOiAI 3926 61 261 163 391 599 346 329 520 542 443 267
2:00 PM 928 5 47 49 89 159 11 72 154 111 103 68
2:15 819 25 6D 40 11 129 65 42 110 116 304 66 2:30 945 8 59 47 102 134 66 68 149 140 92 78
2:15 959 IB 64 40 86 144 89 86 152 113 94 68
HR TO1Al 3651 16 230 176 319 511 293 268 565 480 393 280
OA1' TOTAi 7519 107 191 339 146 1110 639 591 1085 1022 836 541
PERCENT of TOTAL 1.1 6.5 4.5 9.8 15.4 8.4 7.9 14.3 13.5 11.0 7,2
N N ~ .
o ~
5 ~
w
~
¢
4
~
O
ri
H 6
~
m '?a T - 70
m ~
m ~
m ~ m
O M
r1
I-V
V.J o
I ~ ~t l
~ ~ < l ~o~~' $
~r
10 D
V ;
n ~
n.. ~ ~
~ 4ct ~ -
~ m
-4
[7
01 ` ~
t ~ ¢
, , , , ,
,~....,Y,,~
- -
'
APPENDIX B
EXISTING CONDITIONS LOS
HCS: Unsigna'_ized =-Le_s°ctio^s P.elease 2_1g _ACCZ.HCC
C°nz?r :o_' MiC:OCOmplizeTS .'dnSDOri:aL=O.^.
Ufi1V°r51tV 0= tiC:ida
512 We11 r.al'_
vd2P.eSV:_!°, FL 32611-2063,
D=^-; (904) 392-0378
_ St-r=sts: (N-5) Va__ Road (E~
-W) A-~oss 2
Major SL-eet Direczior.... NS
Length of Time Ar:_=_vz=_d... 15 (Min)
G ' VS L . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' ' . . . . HAH'
Daz-_ Analysis.......... 6/25/98
Othe_ I:.Tormatio;:......... ?eak Hour Existing
. '?'wo-way Stop-cor_rol:e' Intersection ~
~ Northbouzd ~ Southbound ~ Eastbounc ~ W=stbound
I L - R I L - 7 R IL 1 R ~ L T R
.
Nc. ianes ~ C 0
~op/Yi~ld ~ ~i 0 > 1 0 Ni 0 0 Q i 0 > 0 < 0
S
Volumes ~ 695 11 ic 530 1 11
p;rF I .75 .9S1 .95 .95 I ~ .95 _95
Grade ~ 0 I 0 I I 0
Mc' s (o) ; I I I
sU/Rv's (o)I I i I
cv1s (o) ; I I ?
PCE'S ~
I 11.10 ~ 1=.10 1.10
Adjustmer.t Factors
Vehirlc C'r 1t1C31 FOIIOW-llD
MaP.°1Ve'_" C'dD (tg) T1P•1° (tL)
-
- Le'~_ Tu= Majo-r Rcau 5.00 2.10
?icht Turn Mincr Roa,-,z 5.50 2.60
':nrougn Tra-=ic Mino= Road 6.00 3_30
Leit Turr. Mincr Road 6.50 3.40
HCS: U.^.s:g:!aIized Z::tersec-ions Rel;,as= 2.1g ?1CC2.HCC page 2 .
Wcrkshee_ =or Tt"TJ2 Izt-=rsec='_on
Step 1: R"' i:rom M_ncr S_Y°ez GT3 E3
_ Cor.fl?c_inc rlows: (v--h) 732
PotenLial Capacity: (pcDhj 589
Mov2menz Capacit-v: (pcph) 589
P:ob. of Queue-r'r°e Sz-Gz=: 0.98
. S=_p- 2: i: from Nlajo= S:I-2et SB hn '
Cor.il;ct_ng Flows: (vph) 733
Poter.tial Capacity: (pcpz) 767 _
Movem=nt Caaacity: (pcph) 767
_ P=ob. of Queue-rree Szate: 0.98
Tii Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700
_ RT Satu=ation Flow Rat°: (pCphDl)
Major LT Shared Lan=_ Prcb.
of Queue-Free Sta*_=_: 0.57
Step 4: LT from Mincr St_ee* WB E3
Conflicting Flows: (vnh) 1306 •
Potentia' Capacity: (pcph) 186
Major LT, Minor TH
Impeciance Factor: 0.97
Adjusted Impedance ractor; 0.97
Capacity Adjustmer_t Factor
due to Impeciing Moveme^ts 0,97 .
Movemzr.t Capaci=y: (acph) 180
_ntersection Performance Summarv
• P_vg : 9 5 0
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Car . Cap Delay Length Delav
Movement (pcph) (ocph) (pcnn)(sec/v2n) (veh) (sec/veh)
-
Y73 L 1 18 0>
~ 507 7.3 0.0 B 7.3
WB R 13 58° >
SB L :17 767 4.6 0,0 A 0.1
1P.z°rsection De1ay = 0.1 sec/veh ~
T ar ; D` ~ n^ ~3yo 1
~ 'r:CS: Unsi~alizec-- nte_s t ons leasa _ 2__J A~~.2.ciCC J -
'
Center For Micro=ompute_s Ir: _ranspo_-a-inz
TJr_=v=rs i t-v e= Flo= i::a
5512 W=*__ =a_1
Gainesvi'_i" _711 3261I-2063
Pn: (904) 392-0376
Sr-_e°ts: (N-S) Main AccesS (E-W) Sou*_h Frontag= Ro3d
Najor Stree*_ D_rec--ion EW
Leng_h c- Time Anal.yzed... 15 (min)
Analyst 'r
:.-)d?;e O: A,alysis........... 8i25/98
0the= lP._c=m3t-io^ . . . . - • - - . Ped!c fiou= EXiSti*lC
Two-wav Szoz)-conzrc llec In:.ersection
~ 7astbound ~ Westbounci j Nort!vbound ~ South7ound _
I L ' R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R
- i---- ----I----
No. LaPeS ~ o a< o ~ i 3 0 ~1 o i ~ o 0 0
Stop/Yield ~ Ni NJ I
vo,1m°S ( 1205 251 io 1795 1 zo 81
Dt=~ ~ .95 . 9-cl .95 .95 1 .95 .951
Grade ~ 0 f 0 1 0 1
McIs ca> ? I I i
su/Rv's (o)~ ! I I
cv,s (o) ~ i ! I
DcE'S I 11•10 11.10 1.101 .
Adjustmznt Factors
V2hicie Critical Follow-uD
Maneuver GaP (t5) Time (tf)
Left Tur:, Major Road 5.50 2.10
Rig'.^.t T::=P. MiP.o= P.Odd 5.50 2.60
Through Tra__ic Mizor Road 6.50 ~
3.30
Le=: ^urn Mino_ Road 7.00 3.40
iiCS: Unsignaliz=_d Inte:sec=ions Release 2..1g ACC2.?iC0 Dage 2 '
j1To1'kSileat _o= TWSC _Il_°rSZczio_^.
i
5tep 1: RT irOm M,inO± 5treet NB S3
Conflicting Flows: (wn) 647
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 551
- Movem=nt Caaacity: (pcph) 651
Pr'ob_ o= Queue-=r=e Stace: 0.99
St°p 2: "LT i_O[i1 MajoZ' StTeet W$ Eg .
Conflictiag Flows: (vph) 1294
F0t2P_tlal Capacity: (pcph) 346
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 345
Prob. of Queuc-Free State: 0_97
- Step 4: LT from Minor StI'e2t N$ gg •
Conflicting F1ows: (vph) 3171
Potential CaUacity: (pcph) ip
Majcr LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor: 0_97
Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0,97 ~
Capacity Adjustment r^actor
du2 to Imneding Movements 0.97
Mov2ment Capacity: (pcph) 10
Inte=s2ctien Pe«ormance Summarv
Avg. 950
Flow Move Sharza Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh). (veh) (sec/veh)
NB L 23 10 ~ 2.4 F
951.2
NB R 5 051 5.5 0.0 B
WB L 12 346 10.8 0.0 C 0.1
int2rsection Delay = 8.8 sec/veR
~ T^e calculated value was greater tnan 999.9. .
i . - - ARRB Transport Research Ltd - SIDRA 5.11
- - - - - - - - - - -
- -
relsburg Holt 6 Ullevig
13 Registered User No. 1234
- Time and Date of Analysis ~ 9:12 P*~*_, Aug 25,1998
Va_1 Plaza Hotel * ROUND *
Existing Conditions
Intersection No.:
SIDRA US Hignwzy Capacity Mar.ual (1994) Vnrsior.
- Roundabout _
t
R'JN INr ORMATION
; Basic Parameters: ' •Inte=section Twe: Roundabout '
D=iving on the right-hand side of the rc>ad
SIDRA US Hignway Capacity Manual (1994) Version
Input data specified in US units
Default Values File No. 11
` Pea}: flow neriod (for performance) : 30 minutes
Unit time (for volumes):120 minutes (Total Flow Period)
Delay definition: Overall delay,
Geometric delay included
Delay formula: Highway Capacity I~`,anuai
Level of Service based on: Delay (HCM)
Queue definition: BacK o£ queue, 95th Percentile
Jail Plaza Hotel * ROUND *
Existing Conditions
Intersection No.:
Roundabout
Pable S.3 - INTERSECTION PARAM_,TERS
Degree of saturation (highest) = 0.656
Practical Spare Capacity (lowest) = 30 $
Total vehicle £low (veh/h) = 3134
" Total vehicle capacity, all lanes (veh/h) = 9503
Average intersection delay (s) = 4.1
Largest-average movement deiay (S) = 6.3
Largest back of weue, 95% (ft) = 162 -
Periormance ?ndex = 148.5$
Total fuel (ga/h) = 102.0
Total cost - 1237.29
- Intersection Level of Service = A
Worst movement Level of Service = A
Vail Plaza Hotel
ROiJND
* *
Er.isting Conditions
:ntersectior. No. :
Roundabout
'able S.6 - INTERSECTION PER ORMANCc
Total Total Aver. ?rop. Eff. Per£. Aver.
Flow Delay Delay Queued Stoo Index SDee3
;veh/h) (veh-h/h)(sec) Rate (mph)
3134 3.57 4.1 0.576 0.61 148.58 14.6
IT,
~ -
. -7ai1 Plaza Hotel * ROLJN*J *
Existing Conditions -
Intersection Na.:
Roundabout
_ Pable 5.10 - MOVEMENT CAPACITY AND pERFORMANCE SUMMArZY
Mov Mov P_rv Total Lane Deg. Aver. Eff. 95% Perf.
-No. Tyn F1ow Cap. Util Satn Delay Stop Back o- Index
(veh (veh Rate Queue
/h) /h) M x (sec) (veh)
qest: West An-.)roach
12 L 355 1016 100 0.349 2.9 0.52 2.1 16.93
~ 11 T 304 1280 68 0.237 3.4 0.52 1.2 14.21
13 R 74 312 68 0.237 3.5 0.56 2.2 3.34
.3outn: South ATaAroacn
32 L 81 251. 100 0.323 6.2 0,69 1.7 4.10
31 T 2.03 629 100 0.323 6.1 0.68 1.7 9.78
33 R 102 326 100 0.323 5.9 0.70 1_7 4.81
East: East Anmroach
22 L 107 383 43 0.279 4.9 0.66 1.4 5.18
21 T 254 908 43 0_280 4.5 0.59 1.4 11.97
23 R 634 966 100 0.656* 6.3 0.98 6.5 31.49
,7ortii : North Anproac-h
42 L 374 1-134 100 0.362 1.6 0.='9 1.8 17.17
41 T 91 283 69 0.322 2.0 0.3"0 1.5 4.04
43 R 216 673 89 0.321 2.0 0.37 1.5 9.33
NorthWest: North West Approach ,
82 L 146 625 100 0.234 3.6 0.57 1:1 7,17 _
81 T 121 518 100 0.234 4.0 0.57 1.1 5.73
- 83 R 72 308 100 0.234 4.1 0.62 1.1 3.32
* Maximum de.^zee of saturation
Vai1 Plaza Hotel * ROUND *
xisting Conditions
.atersection No.:
Rounciabou t
Table 5.15 - CAPA:IT1' AND I,EVEL OF SERVICE (HCM STYLE)
Mov M-ov Total Total Deg. Aver. LOS
No. Typ x'low Cap, of Delay
(veh (veh Satn
/h) /h)_ (v/c) (sec)
r7est: West ADaraach
12 L 355 1016 0.349 2,9 A
11 T 304 1290 0.237 3.9 A
13 R 74 312 0.237 3.5 A
733 2608 0.349 3.2 A ~
~c_t h: Sou:h r.pP=08Ch
L E1 251 0.323 6.' A
31 T 203 629 0.323 6.= A
„ , . 3 R 102 " 316 0.323 5. 9 A - - - •
'
- - - -
386 1196 0.323 6.0 A
, -Last : :ast Approa.^_h
22 L 107 383 0.279 4.9 P.
21 T 254 908 0.260 4.5 A
23 R 634 966 0.656* 6.3 A ~
995 2257 0.650 :5.7 A
Vorth: Nor t.1: Aaproach -
42 L 374 1034 0. 35-- 1.6 A
41 T 91 283 0.322 1.0 A
43 R 216 673 0.321 1.0 A
~ 681 1990 0.362' 1.8 A
NcrthWesz: Nor;h West Approach
82 L 146 625 0.234 3.6 A
81 T 121 518 0.234 4.0 A
83 R 72 •308 0.234 4.1 A
339 1451 0.234 3.8 A
ALL VEHICI.ES: 3134 9503 0.656 4.1 A
_TNTERSECTION: 3134 9503 0.656 4.1 A
Level oF Service calculations are based on
average overall delay (HCM criteria), '
independent of the current delay defi:nition used.
For the criteria, refer to the "Level of Service" tonic in
the SIDRA Output Guide or the Outnut section of the on-line help.
* Maximum v/c ratio, or cri a cal green periods
End of SIDRA (Jutnut
.
APPENUIX C
YFAR 2015 BACKGROUND COND(TIONS LOS
--=...a ~ wcaeda~.~a - ..,_uah 7.11 ' ..'iF,
- ,
Felsburg Holt & UZlevig
13 Registered User No. 1234
~Time and Date of Analysis 9:10 AM_, Aug 26,1998
/aii Plaza Hote1 * BACK *
'~'utt:re Cona=t_ons
Intersection No.:
SIDRA L'S Eighwav Capacity N',a-iual (1994) VEa=sion
, Roundanout
rZUN INFORMATION
. ~'Basic Paramete=s: -
Intersection Type: Roundabout '
~Driving on the right-hand side o-F the-road -
SiDRA US Highway Capacity Manual (1994) Version
Ir.put data specified in US units
Default Values File No. 11
. reak flow period (for perfo_*mance): 30 minutes
Unit time (for volumes):120 minutes (Total Flow ?e=iod)
Delay de-'ir.ition: Overall delay,
Geometric delav included
Delay iormula: Highway Capacity Manual
Level of Service based on: Delay (HGM)
Queue de£inition: Back of aueue, 95th Percentile
-
Tail Plaza Hotel * HACK *
vuture Conditions
Intersectzon No.:
Roundabout
Cable S.3 - INTERSECTION PARAMETERS ,
Degree of saturation (nighest) = 1.181
. Practical Spare Capacity (lowest) - _28 ~
Tota1 vehicle flow (veh/h) = 4391
Total vehicle capacity, all lanes (veh/h) = 7313
Ave=age intersection delay (s) = 55.1 Largest average movement delay (s) = 183.1
Laraest back of crueue, 95$ (ft) = 2630
Per£ormance Index = 366.41
Tota1 fuel (ga/h) _ 177.7
motal cost = 2267.37
. Intersection Level oP Service = D
Worst movement Level of Service = F
Vail Plaza Hotel * SACK }
Future Conditions
Cntersection No.:
Roundabout
i-able S.6 -.INTERSECTION PERFORMp.NCE
Total Total Aver. Prop. E-~:. PerF. P_ver
Fiow Delay Delay Queued Stop Inde:x Sfleed
(v_'r./h) (ven-n/h)(sec) Rate (mph) .
4391 55.04
55.04 45.1 0.764 3.02 366.41 11.5
, _ _
Jail Plaza Hotel . * BACK * -
. Future Conditions ~ .
:ntersection No.: '
RoundabouL
'able S. 10 - MOVE2-=-NT CADACITY .r,ND PER OR*SANCE 5UIj2PLRY
Mov Mov Psv Totai Lane Deg. Aver. Eff. 95$ Perf.
-'.No. Typ Flow Cap. Util Sa`n Delay Stop Back of Index
(veh (veh ~ Rate Queue
/h) M x (sec) (veh)
Iest: West Anvroach
12 I, -197 822 100 0.605 7.6 1.04 6.0 26.87
. 11 T 426 1016 69 0.419 6.7 0.80 2.7 21.45
13 R 104 248 69 0.419 6.8 0.82 2.7 5.06
south: South Approach
32 L 1.14 137• 100 0.832 31.4 1.96 10.4 8.68
31 T 284 341 100 0.833 30.1 2.01 11.6 20.82
_ 33 R 143 172 100 0.831 29.0 2.05 11.6 10.27
°,ast: East Apr .
22 L 307 41 0.489 9.4 0_96 3.3 7.97
21 T 729 41 0.488 9.0 0.92 3.3 18.50
23 Fc 868 752 100 1.181* 183.110.95 105.2 175.94
iort.h: North An-Droach
42 L 524 916 100 0.572 3.3 0.64 3.9 25.85
41 T 128 251 89 0.510 3.6 0.61 3.1 6.05
43 R 303 594 89 0.510 3.6 0.64 3.1 13.90
NorthWest: Nortti West Approach
82 L 204 443 100 0.460 8.0 0.90 2.9 10.99
81 T 269 367 100 0.460 8.9 0.90 2.9 8.86
83 R 101 219 100 0.461 9.3 0.93 2.8 5_18
_ * Maximum degree of saturation
"ail _:aza Hotel * HACK *
'uture Conditions
..ntersection No.:
Roundabout
Table -c!.15 - CAPACITY AND Z,EVEL OF SERVICE (HCM STYI.E)
Mov Mov Total Total Deg. Aver. LOS
No. '!`yv F1ow Cap. of Delay
(veh (veh Satn
/h) /n) (v/c) (sec)
West: West Approacn
12 L 497 822 0.605 7.5 B
11 T 426 1016 0.419 6.7 B
13 R 104 248 0.419 0,8 t3
1027 2086 0.505 7,2 B
5outh: -:outh Apnroach
32 L 114 137 0.832 31.4 C
31 T 284 341 0.633 30.1 C
j . . 33 R 143 172 - --0. 831----.-_29.0 _C
s
541 650 0.833 30.1 C
tast: East An-oroach
22 L 150 307 0.489 9,4 B
21 T 356 729 0.488 9.0 B
23 R 888 752 1.181* 18_!.1 r
1394 1788 1.18? 119.9 c
vo= ;h : No= Lh A=aroac't: _
42 L 524 916 0.572 3.3 A +
~41 T 126 251 0.510 3.6 A
43 R 303 594 0.510 3.6 A
95n~ 1761 0.572 3.4 A
'dor*.hWes* : Nortt: West Annroac'r.
82 L 204 443 0.400 6.0 B
81 T 169 367 0.460 8.9 B
83 R 101 .219 0.451 9.3 B
474 1029 0.461 8.6 B
-ALL VEHICLES: 4391 7313 1.181 45_1 D
-INTERSECTION: 4391 7313 1.181 45.1 D
Level of Service calculations are basEad on
average overall delay (HCM criteria),
independent or the current delay defiiiiotion used.
For the criteria, reFer to the "Level of Service" topic in
:.ne SIDRA Outnut Guide or the Output section of the on-line help.
* Maximum v/c ratio, or critical green periods
Enc3 of SIDRA Output ,
~
-
~ - - . . . _ _ -
?
APPENGIX D
YEAR 2015 TOTAL COND(T10NS LOS
- 7c-5: U^S1c-Z8l1Zed iIIte=3?CL'_OnS Releas° 2.15 C . H
- ~ p~~> >
_ C°nt=r ^o~- Micro_cmpu--e=s In Transnc=;:-=tior.
u'i:iv_I'S_tv O- -_orid? -
5 12 W~i?
Gainesv__ic, FI, 3251-1-2083
(904) 372-0376
_ .SCT_'°2z5 : (N-S) Md__^. ACC°SS (G-tiVT) SOL' ti _ :0:1; 3Qe RO2.C
Majo= St_eet Direct_on.... EW ~
Length c= T_me Az~lvzec__. 15- (min)
Analvst................... HAN
Date o= Analysis.......... 6%25!98
• 0t:-~-r In=crrnatior.......... Deak Hour Y°a= 2025
Twe-way S-Lop-ccnt_ei_ed Izrersection- .
i ^dS=tJOll.^.C I W25tbOllL1d I IVOT'ti'1DOL'17C1 ~ 5outrbound
I L - R L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R
I----
No. Lar.=s ~ 0 2 < 0 3 0 ~ 1 D 1 ~ 0 0 0
- stoo!Yield ~ NI N4 i
Volumes ( 7-790 1001 44 2570 1 83 35;
p::g ~ .95 .951 .95 .95 1 -9~; •951
_ GraQ° ~ 0 1 0 I 0 j
MC'S (o) ~ I I I
~
su/RV's (a)~ I I i
,-v' S (o) ~ I I !
pcE, I s ~ 11.1e 11.10 1.101
Adjustm=nt racLOrs
Venicle C=itiCaI r^oliow-ur)
I`13n2LVe= GcD
(t-g) Time (tf)
?efC TuL':1 Ma]C?- ROc'..^-. 5.50 2.10
Rict7L Tu=n Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through "ra=ffic Mir.or Roac 5.5 0 3.30
LerC Tu:=, N~:~cr Road 7.00 3.40
' :1^..1.. V1 $i anai~Zad TT:I.ei.Se.r.1..10n$ Rel: aSe 2. ~ TcL.'`....Iq c V
C2^=°_ YC= M=C?"OCORIDIli.°rS ~-i: irZ:15==za_=C;;
J:.iversi=v a= ~lo_ida
5 _2 W_i_ ??a' I
Ga_n=svil1°, _L 326:_-2063
°h: (904) 3:2-0378
Scree=s: (N-S) Main Access (-W) South Frontage 2oa^
M3]O_ ."~.t-°°L D=r°^.~lOI7.... rW y
Le::g~-_`_ of '"ime Analyzed... 15 (miZ)
A:-lalys _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-U~'r_
~ Dat° of Ar:alysis........... 8j25/98
Otzer Ir_formation......... Peak Hour Year 2015
`rW0-WaV .S'LJ^-'coP.z=OIi2Q TiiteiSeCLlOi:
~ East-bound ~ Westbound j Northbound ; South:ound
~ L _ R ~ L T R ~ L T R j L T R
Ne. Lanes j 0 0 0 ~ 0 3 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 1
- S*_cp/y; ei d ~ NJ N J I
Volumes 2570 ~ I 83
•95 .95
Grad-= j j Q I ~ 0
M^Is (o) ~ I I I
sU/RV's (o)I I I I
cvIs
' °CE's 1.10
~ Adjustment Factors '
V°h'-clz C-ritical Follow-up
Maneuv=r Gan (tg) Time (t-f)
. Lef: Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10
Ri=t Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Th_ough T=afiic Mir.c: Road 6.50 3.3n
Left Turn MinoY Roa3 7.00 3.40
, . - - - - .
' HCS: Unsignalize3 Intersections ReI_as= 2.I_ ACCA.ri;.0 o~g= ,
• - Can:e_ .or N;icrocompute_S =:i _r3715DO::a_ion
UII1ve: S itV Of F10*_'1Qd
512 We_l Ha?1
Gainesvill°, FL 32611-2083
ph: (gpc) 392-0379
Streezs: (N-S) Main Acc°ss (E-W) Soutr ?rontage Roac
Ma7°r 5==eet Direc=ion..._ EW
- Ler.c--n cf Time AS131VZ2:... 15 (mir)
IzI1GlVJ = . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !"7k:a
Daze of Analysis.......... 8j25/9E .
p*_:!e._ In=o_maz:on......... Peak Heu= Y=_:a: 201-5
Twe-way Ston-con*_rclied lIIt2i52CL1or_~
y
~~as~bound I Westbound ~ IvcY_t-bound ~ Southboun_.d
~ L T R + L T R ~ L T R ~ L T P.
_
No. Lznes ( o a 1 ~ 1 0 0 ~ i o i ~ o 0 0
_ stoA/Yield ~ NJ NI I
VD1L'fR°_S ~ 1790 1-00 1 aa 1 83 351
.95 .951 .95 5=: .951
Grade ~ 0 1 p I p I
NCIs !a> ~ I I 1
su!Rv,s co>~
Iv's (o)
I i i I
PCE'
S i 11•1o 11.10 :.101
~
Adjustment Factors
Criticai Follow-uz
Mar.euver CJap (tg) Time (t=)
- L=:t ^urn Majer Road 55.50 2.10
Rignt TL_n Mincr Road 5.50 2.60
Througn T_-a=:ic Mir:or Road 5.50 3.30
Lef'C 1L'::": Mlricr Roac 7.00 3.40
,
vl:$ : i.T.^_51:~;1aliZ°CI T_ilz°TSEC' _ _ ~'_O^S R?l°~..S° 2. 1•r~~+ a ,
g 4..~A._. ;~~..••n ?aa_ 2 •
Wor;csne=t for Tn1SC Tnz=rsect'_on
S_ep -v_ -rom Miac= 57--reer NB SB
Cor.=_i:._ir.= Flows. (vp:,) 942
POL°nz1di CaDcC.1`V: (DCDP.) aE)l
Mov=mer.t Capac'_ty: (pcph) 451
Prob. cf Qu:ue-F_=e 5tate: 0.91
JL°J Z_ :ei _.rJiT: Md)^_ Stl"2°t 4VB :B .
:.oaflictin3 F1ows: (v--'r:) 1989
?otential CapaC_ty: (pCph) 147
Mov-ament Capacity: (pcph) 147
. P--ob. of Queue-:=ee State: 0.65
. Jz°D C: JT fT_'OTtI M1I10- Si.r°2t N$ SB
Cor:=lic:ing Flows: (vnh) 1530
Potential Capacity: (pcph) 62
Majo= LT, Mir.or TH
Impedance Factor: 0.65
Adjusted Imp=dance Factor: 0.65 •
Capac?ty Acjustm2nt Factor
due to Imaecing Movements 0.55
Uovem?nt Capac:ry: (pcph) ap
In_ersecz:ion Performance Summary
,
Avg. 950
F:iow Mcve 5nared Tota1 Queue Approach
Ra?---e Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay ~
Movemer.r- (pcph) (pcph; (pcphJ (sec/veh) (ve'r.) (sec/-veh)
~
NS L ?0 845.2 8.4 .
599.2
N= R 41 461 8.6 0.2 3
w? L 5= 147 37.0 1.3 ~ 37.0
"nte_section De'_ay = 3-5.2 sec/veh
- - - ~
,y - -
hCS. Ur_signal_z°d Ir.*_~e_seczions Re1ease 2-15 A&CC.:iCO Pag- - Z
.
1h'cr.:j::-c Z TTr:JC je:=r i ..:i
jtep r=' f_or: N:_:ZGr S:"ee_ N3 S3
_ ~o::flict:nc = lows: (ti-ph; 99~
Pozentia? Caz~ac_ty: (pcph) 43=
rnoveme^-_ C3pac; rV: (pcpn) c3g
L=ob. c= Q;:e.::e-?re= Sta_~ . 0.91
S-=p._. :.T «om ti3jo: Street W= :3
~
_or:_1_ctinc Flows: (tiY;^_) i.989
°otenti-=l Capccitt•: (p=h) 147
Mov=me*1t Capaz:_Zy: ;pcp: ) 147
Prob. of: QU°llz-Fre° State: 0.65
Step 4: L'=' =-om MinOr Screet NB SB
Con=lictinq :1ows: (i-pn) 4688
Pc::e:.tial Capacity: (pcph) 1
Majo= LT, Minor T'r.
Impedance Factcr: 0.65
Adjusted impedance r^a=.or: 0.65
~ Capacity Adjustment caczor
due tc Imoeding Movements 0.65
Movement Capac_ty: (pcpn) ,
Int'rs=ctior. Performance Summary
Avg. 55%~
Fiow Move Shared Total Queue .Approacn
Raze Cap Cap Dslay Length LOS Delay
rnc_.em`;-lL (Pc4;-,) (proil) (pcph) (sec/veh) - (veh) (sec/veh)
nr- L 90 ' F
NB P. 1~1 434 5.2 0.2 B
~
bG3 L 147 37 . 0 1.3 E 0.6
Intersecticn Delay = 993_3 secjveh
*':h° calcula:_d valua was g_eater than 999,9.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
.lail Plaza Hotel - t ~,1 *
~ Euture Condi.tians • .
~jitersectior_ No. :
Roundabout
:able S. 10 - NT CADAC=TY ?ND pgRFpgMANCE gUMMpgy
Mov Mov PYsr Tota? Lane Deg. Aver. Eff. 95$ perf_
'No• Z`Yp ~:i^. Cap. Util Satn Delay Stop Bacic oF Index
(vE (veh Rate Queue
/h) /h) x (sec) (vein)
7est: Wes;. Ammroach
12 L 496 806 100 0.515 8.1 I.08 6.3 27.08
'-1 T 438 1003 71 0.437 ~ 7.1 0.83 , 2.9 22,26 ~
_3 R 104 238 71 C.437 7.2 0.85 2.9 5.11
South Anproach
32 L 1.14 130• 100 0.877 38.4 2.25 12.4 9.43
31 T 283 322 100 0.879 36.9 2.31 14.0 22.59
33 R 148 168 100 0.681 35.6 2.37 24.0 11.59
East: East Approach
22 L 153 306 42 0.500 9.5 0.98 3.4 8.16
21 m 360 731 42 0.501 9.1 0.94 3.4 19.08
23 R 908 753 100 1.206* 205.411.95 116.6 194.20
iorth: ISorth Av=roach
42 L 539 906 100 0.595 3.6 0.68 4.3 26.79
41 128 246 86 0.520 3.7 0.63 3.2 6_08
43 R 304 584 68 0.521 3.7 0.66 3.2 14.02
NorthWest: North West Approach
82 L 204 422 100 0.483 8.6 0.94 3.2 11.12
81 174 360 100 0.483 9.5 0.94 3.2 9.24
83 R 104 215 lOG 0.484 9.5 0.97 3.0 5.40
x iVlaxirium degree of saturation
va;.l Plaza Hotel * FUT *
'uture Condit=ons
_n*_ersection No.: ~
Rounc3about
iable S. 15 - CApACIT° p,1dD Lr.V~'L Or SERVICE (HCM STYLE)
Mov Mov Total ToLal Deg. Aver. LOS
No. Typ Flow Cap, o; Delay
(veh (veh Satn
/z) /h) (v/c) (sec)
N1es`: hest Aamroach
12 L 496 806 0.615 8.1 B
11 T 436 1003 0.437 7.1 B
13 R 104 238 0.437 7.:? B
1038 2047 0.515 7.6 B •
~
-,oc4-h: Sout:: :narcach,
32 L 114 130 0.877 38.4 D
31 T 283 322 0.879 36.9 D
HCS. Gnsicaalized I^te_seczio^s ?__?_.-=s2 2.1c ACC3.:C0 pzg= 2
N:.^rriCSti'i?er- TWj` _n_?=s°_z:_Oi:
J:°:) I. r._ ~=0:i1 Pf:i 0: \B JE
Co Flows vz^? 902
Pote.^:=:a1 Capac'_ty: (zcph) 4-83
Moyem=r,L CaLaci:y: (p_-on) 483
?rob. Of QL'e'.:°-^ree Jt3t-°: 0.80
I:,te_seczion Per=oamance Summary
Avc 9.5 %
?_ow MoJe Shared Totai Queue Azprpach
_ Ra=° Cap Cap Deiay I,eng*h LOS Delav
Mov=ment (pcph) (o--pn) (pcph) (sec/veh) (v=h) (sec/veh)
9.3
S3 F, 96 483 9.3 0.8 B
In*°=Sec;.ion Delay = 0.3 sec/veh
- _ ARRB Transport...Research Ltd - SIDRA 5.11
.
Felsburg Holt 6 Ullevig
13 . Registered User No. 1234 ,
Time and Date of Analysis 9:11 A*i, Aug 26,1998
Vail Plaza Hc=e1 * F7T f
Pature ConcLt--orxs
Lntersection No.:
SIDsZA US Highway, Capacity ManuaZ (1994) Version
Ftoun.dabout -
RUN INFORMATION
k Basic Parameters:
Intersection Tyne: Roundabout
Driving on the right-hand side of the road
SiDRA US Highway Capacity Manual (1994) Version
Input data specified in U5 units
Default Values File No. 11
Peak flow period (for per:o:mance): 30 minutes
Unit time (for volumes):120 minutes (Total Flow Period)
Deiay desinition: Overall delay,
Geometric deiay included
Delay =ormula: Highway Capacity Manual
Leve1 of Service based on: Delay (HCM)
Queue definition: Back of q_ueue, 95th Percentile
Vail Plaza :iotel * FUT *
Future Conditions
Intersection No.:
Rounciabout •
Pable S.3 - INTERSECTION PARAMETERS
Degree of saturation (highest) = 1.206
Practical Spare Capac_ty (lowest) _ -30 €
Tota: ve:icle flow (veh/h) = 4463
Totai vehicle caaacity, a1Z lanes (veii/h) = 7189
Average intersection delay (s) = 50.9
Z.argest average movement delay (s) = 205.4
Largest back of queue, 95$ (ft) = 2916
Performance Index = 392.16
Totai fue1 (ga/h) = 285.3
Total cost = 2379.22
Intersection Level of Service = D
Worst movement Leve1 0: Service = g
Vail Plaza Hotel * FUT *
='uture Condi tions .
Inte=section No.:
Roundabout
?'a]o1e S.6 - INT :RSECTION PERFORMANCs. .
Total Total Aver. Prop. EfF. Perf. Aver.
Flow Delay llelay Queued Stoa Index Speed
-(veh/h) (veh-tn/h) (sec) Rate (mph)
4453 63.12 50.9 0.772 3.29 392.16 11.1
• 33 R 148 168 0.881 35.6 D
_ 545 620 0.881 36.8 D
-
:ast: East Anvroach
22 L 153 305 0.500 9.5 B
21 T 356 731 0.501 9.1 B
23 R 908 753 1.200* 205.4 _
1927 1790 -1.206 134.1 F
"Jortn : North Approach
42 539 900 0.595 3.6 A
41 T 128 245 0.520 3',.7 A
43 k 304 584 0.521 3_7 P_
-
971 1735 0.595 3.6 A '
•
'Qor::.'tiWest: NorYi: West Aaproacn
62 L 204 422 0.483 8.6 B
81 T 174 360 0.483 9.5 B
83 R 104 .215 0.464 9.9 B
_ 482 957 0.484 9.2 3
AZ.L VEHICLES: 4463 7189 1.206 50.9 D
INTERSECTION: 4463 7189 1.200 50.9 D
Level of Se_vice calculations are basiad on
average overall delay (ECM criteria),
independent of the cu=rent delay definition used.
For the criteria, re=er to the "Level of Service" topic in
tne SIDRA Outaut Guide or the Output section of the on-line help.
* Maximum v/c ratio, or critical green periods
End of SZDRA Output -
n -u -r, lU. 1vJ~ J•.lY?~ u+++ua;n n1iy n~.JvUin lYV,
. .
- _ ,
- - F r o m :1070 FELSBURG HOLT ULLEVIG
rngineesixr pachs m cramsponadoa sotAcions
I NO\811~~ 16, 1999
Mr. 7im Losa
Zehren and Associstes, fnc. ~
P.O. Box 1976
Avon, Catoradv 81620 RE: Access Iswea - Propoaed Vml Plaza Hoce!
FHU Aeference 99-t99
I Deac Tim: I
; We have prepared this lettsr in roponse io your letter dsted Ncvember 4, 1999 'regac+ding
access issues at the proposed Vail P1aza Hotel. We have adcirssaed wclti cammeat as folfows:
Cornmm L- 7ire posslbilit y of traffic bacAafng up t+o the rounda6out fiam the south cntry vn
Vad Rcsd wlthaut a ded/caW left tum lanw-
A tare! srsclcing distance vf 310 feet wouid be avaiiable along Vaii Rosd between the
Roundabot,+= and the propcsad southem tbtel enVy_ This staclang distaoce would aczommociate a queue lengttt of about 15 vehicles. On avetage, h Is foreeas'ted that about
1 vatiicle per minutc wll) tturf left irrto the sfie. and about 13 vehicles per mintstr. will cotrflctue
south atong Vai1 Rcad_ Pnder an exrreme candition. 'rf all 14 of thasa vahiclss were ta ztop
at the entry irne*secticn, then a queue lertqth of about 280 het woutd be genucated. 5uch a
~ queue length would noi excaed the avallable sucWng dls=Snce. However. thls represerrLS a
worst case scenano. Queus iengths ara expected m be significartly less than 280 fieet, sic?cs
; mort than 1 venlcie per minate acE expected to be abte to wm ltft into the site.
'
~ By evaluating the avai ie 'gap" time for teft-tvming vehicias aiong Vail Raad, it was
estirTaatsd that abaut 4 iciss per minute, or 1 vahicle everY 15 sezonds, cauld tum lefit Inte
the sate. Jn a 15-s~an lntervai, about 4 vet~icles (on average) ara fareeas'ied ta head soudl
alonq~ Vaii Aoad. tf 411 4f these vehicles were tc step at the entry intarsecrien, then a queue
Sength of about SO feet would be generatsd. Such a queue would noL even blecf the proposed
exit ariveway cf the Notel site.
}
i
I
303.7Z1.1M0
• 6u ]M.721.M32
~
Cauas•ood C490wte Pl-=
~ 7953 E M*,rood AMe. Sc. 7D0
~ . . Fa*woad, CO S0113
~ . . _ - - - From:1070 Navember 16, 1999
-
y. Mr, Tim Losa .
Psge 2 ~
Cama,w! 2 The safacy and/w risks associst+sd wiM ihe hod exit located eig'ht feet svuih
of the VaU Gsreway access w? Val1 Road
In sincations whsre two accrss drivewaYs am clasely 3PCW, k is imperativa frvm a safety
star:dpoirYC that qood sight dLsrance is availabie at bcth s=,sm' Safety at x,ch intsrsections
i can alsa be improved by minirnWr?g che numbar af canffict'"D n'rns. Ttds can be done by
~ - nestrfctina ingress attd/or egrsss tumins mcvementa. In the cue of ttw proposed Hotel. it is .
~ recommended that the accssa be l;rtked to outbound mavwven'ts oNY (i.s. an a:it only). As
noted in our September 27. 1999 lettar report, prohibiting inbOund teft tians at this acceas wdl
j efiminete overlapping left num canfllcts along Vai1 fiood. .
( Therefcre, while this sparng is nat am ideal candirion, the Provissan af good sight dLsUr=•
i the restricUOn of cmovements (outbourid onty), the forecasted low vofume o'f exiting trafflc, and
~ the relstively low speed ar+ROnment shouid allow for an acceptable condrtian.
Camrn~ni 3: The sefery anc~/or risks assoc~te~d wlth the hotelloading a~nd de/ivpsy enL?Y an/Y
accefs Zs indlcat+~sd !n Oprion A ar,d rY's proximity io the ratiindabovr on tAe
South Fronrayre Raad.
The benefits and d;awbacics o1 !he proRosed desi9^ af ti'fe fronta9e rosd access have been
idenMied ats follo
• The proP veway is designed such that deiivery uuclcs (including seMf-trailet
truclcsf +nto the unloading/dock area of the site wiithaur. impsc.ting vaffiC on
the froMeg* ?oad- '
er+try lane provices a refuge area for decderating (right wming) vehid~.
. The pro4c
thefebY inQ thv Gkelihoodl of reer~nd aolltsiott~ fsam trafflc exitinp =he raundebout.
,e?tsa, a !e ot trucic can stop within thi5 refuge (while a de~very vehlcle is
maneuvering wtthin the site) and teaffc elong the Fronta9e Rcsd virill still not be
imvacred-
. , Wrong•waY movements cau?d be made up the inbound accss lane. Nowevw, ttt+s can
be mitigates3 by pesting 'Do Wot ErtLer' andlor'Wron9 Way" signs.
. As notec' bn+ thjQ Town's Enqineer, encering vehldes cautd rear-end a trudc making
baczing 'n=euYess ar+-tite. Hvwever, thia can be mttiga[ed by posted 'Yteld' signs
*he basa flf the anny tane. ihis yviit aiart an iracaming driver of potential cmflieL
j ~
i .
~
~
~
I .
I
. .
I
I ~
~
i~
~ ~ I ,5
c
~ti ~
u
. ~ _ ~ ~ - - ci
Mel c~
ki
rir I"v. ~
r
.
~
~ ~ De N&'T SN
so" ~
~
c
- - - - - _ ~
. ~
• ~ i~~~ c
~
~ ?.~.*N,,4t OF .ti _ , ~
yilLb
~
i
. Do NOr
V8dl P1mm IiOtBl ~ I j \ /~---%~a---------------,
L,mdl% and WYety - Opfim A ~ 1 1 ~ i?
19'4" Bpait lldfity Yd"
i v' ~ ~"?u~YI~e~G'u~tb/~~ .
r,Am .ee Amcift tm,
~ M w M ~ ~
*
I Q
^
v
~ o \
~ i ts
~ i
; ' ~ • ~
~ . , - - - - - - -
' . ~
Z E H R E N ~'jat~ t
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ve.
No v o ~ isss
Thursday, November 04, 1999
Mr. Lawrence Lang
Transportation Engineer II
Felsburg, Holt and LJllevig.
. Greenwood Corporate Plaza .
. 7951 E. Maplewood Avenue, Suite 200 Englewood, Colorado 80111
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel
W. Lang:
I had recently reviewed your report dated September 27, 1999 with the town engineer. In reviewing the
report and the associated access points, the erigineer wouId like us to address a few additional items.
Specifically, the town engineer would like us to address:
1. The possibility of traffic backing up to the roundabout from the south entry on Vail Road without a
dedicated left turn lane.
2. The safety and/or risks associated with the hotel exit located eight feet, (eighteen feet from the
centerline of the gateway drive), south of the Vail Gateway access on Vail Road.
3. The safety and/or risks associated with the hote] Ioading and delivery entry onIy access as indicated in
Option A and it's proximity to the roundabout on the South Frontage Road. It is our intention that 55
semi-trailers, and 45' passenger coaches use the drive (entry) lane for backing prior to departing
through the east exi[. Our feeIing is that passenger coaches only frequent the hotel during the "off
season" or low traffic periods due to the fact that the hotel operates as a&actional fee condominium
half the year and does not have the remaining occupancy to be able to cater to large groups.
Additionally, other than the initial equipment and furnishings move-in period, we foresee no semi-
trailer h-affic although it has been determined that we need to provide for such vehicles. It is our
objective to have all other vehicles inr.luding 35' sUaight-body trucks and 50' articulated (beer
delivery) be able to tum right out of the structure with minimal maneuvers. It is the town engineer's
concem that vehicle entering the drive will rear-end vehicles using the drive lane for a backing
movement
4. The safety and/or risks associated with the hotel loading and delivery exit only access as indicated in
Option .A and it's proximity to the rounciabout on the South Frontage Road. Specifically, the town
engineer would like some comment on the feasinility and safety of both autos and the larger service
type vehicles tuming left on the frontage road. We have preliminarily indicated medians for protection
of the center tuming lane in this option.
Addirionally, the town engineer had asked us to eYplore additional options for a combination in/out 90-
de2ree access. Enclosed is Option B exploring that option. Please just generally discuss any positive or
negative impacts associated with this scheme including safety concerns associated with its proximity to the
roundabout. ,
ARCMITECTIiRE•PLANNING•INTERIORS•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
P.O. Box 1976 • Avon, Coloradc, 81620 •(970) 949-0257 • FAX (970) 949-1080
1W 1Ja J . J.1Ji76 "LUilL:11 AAL AJJVVIA
3
. •
From:1070 November 18. 1999
- - - -
Mr. Tm tosa •
Page 3
Overall, n shculd be noted that tha vol?une cf ffaffic entenng and exting the site ss vpsy lovv
and trUCk related trefflC is expeCted t4 be inffSqlR'rit DurinB Peak Deriods, only 1 vehide
every 3 mintsLes (on averaga) is forecasted Ua wm inro rhe site, ard abCU= 1 vehicie every 5
minutes is expected to sxit the site, an everaga- Also, it is arrticipaced that traffc w+31 ertter
tfie s6te at low speeds, giva+ thai the accesa is locaied in dose proxim[ty to a roundabout
v, nere axiting speeds are low.
Canuuient 4, The safety and/orjisks amodaied wiffi the hotd Ibadwg and de&ery avt oNy
ac=ass as 1naEicataal:n Optlon A snd it's proximfty to the rioundabaW an die
Sorrd, Fiontaye Aload. $pecificaUy, the rown e?Wmer would /late sv~s
cvminent on the fkasWtiry and ss&ty of bod? eatos and dre laigw _.Arvce rype
vehicles tivrnrng /e!t an ihe fron=ge road.
in ragards to ahe fosibility of trucks tuming leh onto the fromge rosd. it eppesa from the
turrung templates that y!ou provided tttat this aftutd not be a pmblem. From an opemtiand
siendpoirjt.it wss determinedthatth. artbound left tuminp uattic rvitt expsrienca lonp dalays
(levet af s8rvice ef 'E' cond(tions) during peak periods. Nowever, this does*not necassM
imply thst tuming out cf Tha site wiU bs unsafe, but oniy that drivsrs rYwy have io wait for Iona
periods before an accapcable gap ire traffic is avaiiebie for tumine. Sefety beevmes an issue
if sdriver becames, impacient snd gums,onco the ftcntag8 road when a gap in traffic ia not
sutf cient_ I
- In regards tv the option:of provkiing e 90-deDrcs accass aiong the frorttage rosd, we befi4ve
that tlzis also repressnts a viabie option from an operrtional sumdpoint provided that the entry
and exii prades meLK Town criteria. Hewevef, it eppears that a 55-fvot sem%traler could rwt '
rnan euves on-site without making a bacfcing manauver onto or off of the frorrtage roed. Such
a manewer would c: eata a very haa1'dous situ2liion.
If you have any quastions regarding our findings or if yeu need addrtionat asaistanca, pieasa
catl.
Sincerety
FEI-SBIJRG HOLT & UllEV1G
~
Lavimn . ng
+ Transpvrration asr Il .i
~
(
~
~
~ - - -
. ,
Vail Plaza Hotel Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 11/04/99
The design intent of both options is to schematically meet the deveiopment standards and turning radii of
the types and numbers of vehicles dictatecl by the town engineer and planning staff: It is our intention that
we have the approved design fully engineeTed for confumarion of the ideas presented pnor to permitting of
the project by the town or CDOT.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or the; town engineer, Greg HaK, with any questions or concezns. We
would hope to have confirmarion of these issues by Friday, November 12, 1999 if it is at all possible.
Sincerely,
~
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
Cc: George Ruther, Senior Planner, Town af Vail .
Greg Hall, Town Engineer, Town of Vzul
Enclosures
2
~
~ _
/ ~ ~ - -
~ . _ -
~
,
/ , ~ - _ _ - ` - - - - - - . _ -
- -
/
f- \
_ . , _ _
_ - -
/ - ~ ~ ~
_ . _ - -
, _ _ _ , - - = - .
~ _ _ _ "
_ ~
, - - -
- - - -
~
~ _ - - -
~ - -
-
. - -
. ~ - - -
~ ~ - - - - - _
- I
`\i+t1, BU{ bas ~A~ _ nu
' : - 1• ~~-,.1f%i~~'_~
~~'v. ` -
f,, ~n • ' i
I ~ _Z_
. • ~ ~
_ - tn~ _ _ ~L' • 'a~ , ~ ~iew4i \
\ ~ .
~aw~. 11 ~ - . ' ~ rer ;
I i
VaIl PIaZB H04Cfl
Losding end~g ~~mon A
aNn. ~
9tale:l•-211'-0" I i
Nwembc 4,1999 J[.O1D~ I I
Tahrm md Amociatm, Inc. i
I I
~ I I
. I
I
I o '
I I
'
. ~ .i
/ ~ -
,
~ ~ - . - - - ~ ~
~ - = - ,
~ - ~ , _ , -
~ - -
~ ~ ~ - -
~
, - - ~
-
, ~ , - _ _ ,
,
, - -
_
.
~
~
~ -
~ .
. _ _
,
; ~ .
~ ~ \ ~ ~
' - _
- -
-
" \ ~
ms
, \ , \ \ ~ . - - - - - '
_ .
J
- " . i I
~ -
~ ~ - T O .
~nr~ - - - - - _
~ _ ~ ~m. - ~ I
-
~L-------~--------------_____.-----hu`n'--
~ Vsefl Pflmza Hotefl ~ ~ -
Loading andDeuvcrr-Option a
19'-6" Spmt Utility Vehicle
9a1a1"-21W Novanber4, 1"9
LobbY
T.eMm~ d Auoofeen. Im.
~ I q
I 1
I (
I
o I
I I
I I ,
I
i
~
~
" ~
-
/
,
-
; , , , , - ~ _ _ _ - _ _ _
_ -
,
- . ,
,
~ - - .
•
~
- - - -
. - - - - -
~ - \
- - - - ~
-
~
~
_
~
~ -
~ - - -
~ -
. ~ "
_ - - -
,
\ \ ~
• - - ' - - - ' - I ~ ~ ;
~n.. , ) ~
~ .~z~ -
,
i
T-7/
.
- \ • \ _ _ - - - ' _ _ - - - - I
_ ' ~
' -
..----ue '
' •r"+ r J - ~ ~
~ -
-
I \ \ \ u - - ~ _
\ \ I
Vait Pl8Z.3 liOBEl
Loadinand IDeliu
B aY - Option A
SS' 3emihailer \ ~ • ~ • ~
c.~~.~.
. ~ ~
9ala 1"=20'-0•
NwaobQ4,1999 1Labby
` \Y\ ~
TrLem d Auaciaon. Ioo" ~ ~ -
1
b
I '
1 (
I
I - I
1
,r
' •°=c
- . ;
, i
~ / ~ / ( - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ - _ ,
~ ~ _ _ _ ~ ~ ` - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ' \ \ `_i
' ~ ~ ' ~ ' - - -
~
,
~a
~
~ _ _ - - - - - - - - - '
C ~ ~ _ - - - -
1
~ - , - - =
.
~
~ = _
- ' .
- - ----------1~
,i ~ . - ~ ~
~
~ ~ - ~
~ -
~ ! ~ ~ . - - - , -1 ~
\ - - - - - -
\ \ - - - - 7'~~---
. ~ " - - - - .
- ' ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ t/~
- ' ~ ~ 1 - - - ~ - - -
- _ - - /
,
~ - . .
V&ll P1a2ffi HOtCl _ ~ ~ - - - - - I
~
I.aading aad IDelivery - Op6un A ~ , ~ \ - - r '
45' Coech ~.un. 7 ~ - - - - - - - -JL= _ - - - I
I
Snla l"-201-0"
xovemb.a, 1999 I.obby
zehcm.ue Auod.ow,lne. ~ i
r I
/ 1 I
. ~ I
i
. 1 ~
f
I '
i •
~ ~ Y.~_
.,..a:
; . -
.
. ~
,
. ,
"
_
„ '
~ ~ ~ - - ` ~
. . _ - - - -
_ . - . . ~ - . . _ .
'
- ~
_ _ _ _ _ : - _ -
~
. - _ - ' _ - ,l
~ -
~
_ i I ~
..'4 ~
ijs •
, -
.
' ~ - - - -
_ - - -
~ \ _ - _ _
\
/
. _
_ ~ ,
. ~ - - -
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ L-'_~
_ \ \ \ I
~ ~ ~ i c Muasl•
VanflPlmmn ]EAogefl
Loading and IDelivery - Optioa A
35 Shaigtrtbody/50 Articuletod
Sdc1"-2m-o•
Nwembc4, 1999 rt.obby
Zahm and Auocfahs, lm.
FF
d
I 1 I ~
~
I
. ~
I I
I I
~ v
I .i k
. , . s:,
~ . .
3
~ ~
y
~
" 9~~ - _
\
~
, ~ - - - -
/ ~ - _ - _ -
-
; a _ _
- -
~ -
- - _ - '
- -
.
-
_ - ~
- -
~ -5-.
- - = ~ -
_ - T y • _ -
~
~
`
...J~
_ _ ' .
.
M ^
y.. _
' ~
,I
- _L--
- - I
~a
. .
,t - -
. . ~ o
.
~
= - - I - - " - ~
Vai
1 PlBZ& 1H[atel
. trr
QUpt EII
~ _ _ /1 _ :l ii? I ~ [ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 19 - 6~ SPmt Ubllty VChiClO - Zr REgW
~ ~ I---- ~ _ ~
~ - - - ~ ~
-
~
-11 ~/__II 1'-- jF
Zebm md
~ • i~y/~~ - ~ _ . __j~ ~.I_,
- ;
-
C -
- i
,
~
,
,
I ,
n - I ~
n
0
i
I ~
i
!
' ~
~ ~ _ .f •
_
- - _ -<<~
\ - ' '
_
I
-
~f.
py
~ . ~
_ _..C
~
. _ y _
I
~ . . _r . ~ . .
~
.
.
.
- ' ~ ~ ~
„^---1• _ _ ~ `~4: iY.\~ , . e. ~ ~ ~ '
_
_
.
.
: . ~ .'f S.:S. Y.'C. . -
.
? _ . .
~
. ..1. . ~J.' . " " ' 1~
i . : ' " •
.
. . ~ ~ .
. v'~ - . . . . . '
. . ~ . . . ~ . ; . . _ _
: . _
~
. . . -
. . . _ .
:f.
. . . ~ ~~.'t ~ . _
i..•:
. . ..t~.. . _ - _ .
' .li-_' . ~ . . . • ~ ~ ~ - ~
II!
. .n:.. : . •
• ~ ' . ~ ' i:T.~
..~~....i,:~:...:~.. . . . . . ~l« -c~ '
. . ~.t. ~ . "I ' '
~ x•
- _ , - l . . ~ ' . .
.
~
- - ~
_ _
:
~
:
. . . ...i . , ~
~
'
. .
_
.
;
.
:
~
. .
~
,
. ~ ~ _
• r:,.
- . _ . . j ~ i. . ~
. . .i:v'.. . "
, .
. . ~ . . „ . ~
, i -
, . .
- a? --~f -
. .
_ _
_ _ ' 'i` ' . - ' ' ' ' ' • - ~ '
,
.
`B
`CA'fEMAY UIIA114
' -
.
-
i
- ~
o s-. -
- .
/
/
i.
1 -
- . :31~f it'.•~~'•'.~•
/
'•l..
'i.
,•s''
'vu
'r.
i
'•f -
/
~ -
f - "
I r?. -
~
~ : j•'.
_ . . . :
~
I -
. .
~ i
.
v
~
„
.
.
.
. , , : '
/
.
.i
Ir -
~ . , :
'i .
. . ~
_
,
1 wie r
r -
. . . . . . . .
. .
/
, .
.
. . ,
• '
.
j ,
. . _
.
.
~ . .
. . . ~
. . . . - _
kY•..~
. . :i . '
~
. . . "....~.::~.~:-o...:. .'r:.?.);:. _
_
'•'i:::~.+~.... ~ '
{
- '~t: ••1,...
. ti, ,of~•'~~
.t..j,:...~, ~l.
' .ic` ?i::'.•'c':i:
I
. . r,.~. .
. Y• c::
_ ~y„•;; ~ •„J:.~.T::: _
r %b e
..r _
~
~
. ~
'S -
. . .
.
I na ' K
.
_
•_F-~ ~:AZ
~'rx
~ ~PI
. , .
\lLL}/~~ ~
:a
_
~~1•` •'1 , ~
- .S. ~t" 'c'`
_ .t. l
:
J• 1
- -
- tc~•. {AS
s "or:• F
_ P
;...r~......r .
. - - •*~i;, w. -
, . .
.
7..
-
.
1.
.:a
_ Tn, •Y~
. . . . . n..,,..~ .
~ ~ . ;
~ ,
~ -
• 1 v'1'^. . -
. .
~•t::`:~ '
~ S
~
i.
':r•r .Y•• . S:.
a'
•a.
_ ~ ~
a:h' l
.J. n
3. f.~. , L 7
..1
l.i. $ •
'l: - t.
y.
°x.
G •+7
i :~G'•
. _ y ..i~: , tr • t ~y
G.~ . r
t.N.
. •.~+*l i:..: -
~ ~'•y, ';1.
; ~u'
,rj •'i
.
•,a--,r.
,
• a. ,
h.I.
.r,..,
- a:
~v
- •L -uu
' ~S: S'ti• S ~'`i;'.;•::,,;':.
. . - ' •:'i' ~ e.~..+
- .RS
. .1~; ^,•a i.
. f,
: n~..., n .
: J3:• `
~rs r~-
~
~
~•i - .
7 .
%3 . ' .
~
.6"
••k-;
1~'.
_ :',s •:iw~ -
~ - .
. - t ~ i:
- - ' ? 1
. - 1.~ l' • \
.::j~.~.- • ,
.
~
...y' `I~.: . .
=7 i•i; .
_ - i ~ : c~~ .t
~ - - _
_ " - ::i',• '
•t::..y
' .'1+I. J
~
- ;'y~,'. '•f
~ > > I :L~' , r
.l~-:-~~~
< 4 ~ _ ~ ' . . ~ . t i,i~:; . . ~ ' ' I . .
.
: .
_ L k-: . _ _ ~.::~:7~,.~::::~::~; ? ~ ,
.
. .
,
.
. . .
:
1
. - -
- -
~
J . -
•:i: _ . + - - - - _
i
_ _ . . ~
.
.
~
. - ~
~
-
- ~ /
. 1 ' •.l'.: . " 1'i'~ - - _ ~ ;
/ '
. \
- ~
..'.P.' .
O
'
~ - a.- `.ii• ~ °
' '.l,•~.~..
In Pl7TVRB' '
. . , i Y.~'':.'~S''e~;,~.;;_^• - .1.
- 77
- ry. g ~ •2z::.•.S°~:•r., ~
~
. ~.M
~•1`'4s
. ~ {
,
. ;3t. ;1','•~;-
. ~A~•
tiA 58 f.
_
P ~
~
~K
_ .f
" ~
:u - ^7`
~
-j!
a:
~ ~-'6 AW
` -
':t ~ •°r
. z>.
'I - :~3`°i 1:... t•,
. ~.f '-~:--•r
.GZ
i•,.
.
u: - s+°- r'; . ~ - { u. '4iN'PI.tZ
i ,'•,c;f. L""f.:;:.:.,:~ - .•,:i;P~ , .
~ ~ ~ .
- `a~'' r^ . Ei^' •_t:~'
r<<;
~
. .~J• "i~` l•if^-
P ~ ~
. H/IS9
• ~ ::c,: • ,:,~;r: i
~!i:: -
_ •
- _ .c.
>
Y
- 'c
-
.~5
_ ?(:.r.
~
l:f: r.•'~~=
: NC
_ - i
.
Z~ - •,l: :
> -
3.
- `S•i \
~ •:i~:
,
.
.
.
. .
r`.
' - ~
. .
~ .
V f. .
\
-
_ . . . . . { . - - - i--
1 , - -
~
_ . . , - . ..i . . .
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ..,t ~ ~ ,
. 5..,~~ . ~
5 •aa k-.,:',j , . . .
_ . ~ . ~ ....~.•~L.:. . :~i..•• ' . _
. . . . . . :
. . . ...f ..,'~i.....o....,~ ~.q . ,
. L~ - . ....f. I "
rt
~ . . ~ . . ; . ..~;i-.~ ~ ' ~ .
.L.. -,•t<: ~
,•s•, I
,
, -
, w
,
~
y'.
- ~
1r
~
_ n
_ .
t•ti•:::i,.. ~ 5:..
'
•S
- 1.
.:.x:-.
Lt ~ ~
~l
~ j ~ w ++q_ `
~T-
'
~'~5'::.:•:
!Sly~f+,"' .
_ ;J~.;;o•~~
I
/
7
r ~
~~~:-.,,=•:v=~ "
I: C7
i -
?i' ~'ec%•`.. •d.. -
• ~~J ~i
.J •
'.T..
:1iti.^•f>~:: ~ ~
1'r
\
-
5•+ - ~
t
1 Pd1.?(r
y~ ~t,•
- I(j rt::, . •
T>$'7naa . , ~5' `
I
'-YJU~1
}{o}
v .
u"•, z~tA~~;'•~::.;-,~.
:i Piil98 B~~_
1
~
rx
~
,L• `y:: -Y 4N`.
I i~;= 1$ VIIliA
~,2•: _
•Y I
-
~ s
~ v.
•:j~, }y.=..
i~G;v:INH; t ~
A+ •w~ .
5
..p~n•:: _ \
'.U
N: ..a.
.
l
..ti"~; •
:'A '7 •1e SAw7i:`
~:N'i ~ • ' -
-
- S •b;:`•`•'... :~x•"~ ~3
~
.a.
'r
E•r.•.~?~
e L ~.r' /
4•
. . x~s8 . ..t. . :7
,
_
- _L
~ -
~r•;
'•2'; .
- °'1•`:~:•:.-•:.~;':!7:~''
\
~•e • e.r
f
'i~•.: ' ~
s
- ~~'~'...;i.•~ .
4:'l
-
.~1.
- •'~i%~
~r[•.:,•. ' .
- - ` .
J
`i~•:: i • . .
I
~1•.
I -
. `
- ~
\
- \
. -
f - ~
.
~'r• _ _
~
-
. 77
~ ~ f~', .
l~
~ -
/
's
.
J~ ~ N ; . ~~~a:.,:;;:
-
- - /
% -
~'i.'~' I . a i .
: .
- . r:
. .
- ~jCl:..
l"1~
:II~l~1V;. - -
. : .
:
az.
. . .
- '
.L
. , . . VAII~
. . . . . . . . . . .
_ . j L.
I
. . . , . . . . . . . . .
.
~ ','~C~i:~....~ •=E;
. . - . . . , .
.:4,: -r' ,1IDR TF
.
; t
.
. .
- c~r Y.'•
-
.
. . . . .
.
, , .
. . .s• .
. ~ ~ . . .
. ' ~ i i:-• . .
rY:`•i:'.:: •:j'.~ _i,'~ ,'1:~
. ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . , . . . . . , : Y.+~q . . _ . . . . . . . . . .
Vail Plaza Hotel Zoninq Analysis
(Revised 12/13/99)
Lot size: 1.467 acres or 63,902.5 sq. ft. (Phase IV & IV-A only)
3.45 acres or 150,282 sq. ft. (All Phases)
1998 SDD Major
Development Underlying 2oning Existing Amendment Proposal Revised 1999 SDD Major
Standard of Public Accommodation Vail Villaqe Inn (reieetedl Amendment Proposal
Lot Area: 10,000 sq.ft min. 150,282 sq. ft. 150,282 sq. ft. 150,282 sq. ft.
GRFA: up to 150% or 225,423 sq. ft. 83% or 124,527 sq. ft. 133% or 200,460 sq. ft. 117°h or 175,666 sq. ft.
(87,889 sq. ft. existing) (129,156 sq. ft. proposed) (104,362 sq. ft. proposed)
(36,638 sq. ft. remaining)
Dwelling
units per acre: 25 du/acre 24 du/acre 12.7 du/acre 12.7 du/acre
(AU & FFU unlimited)
Site coverage: 65% or 97,683 sq. ft. 37°h or 56,188 sq. ft. 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. 62% or 92,637 sq. ft.
Setbacks:
front: 20' N/A 12' 6'
sides: 20' N/A 01, 8' & 6' • 5', 0', 2', & 5'
. rear: 20' N!A g1 51
Height: 48' sloping 68' sloping 85.75' sloping 73' sloping
(Phase III) 87.5' (arch.proj.) 73.75' (arch, proj.)
Parking: per T.O. V. Code Section 177 spaces 394 parking spaces 288 parking spaces
(373 required at (246 new parking spaces)
buiid-out per Ord.) (42 existing @ Phase III)
Loading: per T.O.V. Code Section three berths six berths five berths
12-10-13
Landscaping 30% N/A N/A 25% or 19,171 sq. ft.
Commercial
sq. footage: 10% of aliowable GRFA 31 % of GRFA or 38,961 sq. ft. 23% of GRFA or 47,226 sq. ft. 26% of GRFA or 46,124 sq. ft.
or 22,542 sq. ft.
0
F:leveryone\pecUnemoslvviza ~
PI
N
n
m
. p
rt
bd
Attachment C
Valll Plaza Hotel
Proposal Comparison
(revised 12/13/99)
The following table provides a comparison betwe;en the 1998 Vail Plaza Hotel proposal and the most recent 1999
Vail Plaza Hotel proposal
1998 SDD Major
Development Amendment iProposal 1999 SDD Major
Standard/ (reiected) Amendment Prooosal Plus/Minus
Lot Area: 150,282 sq. ft. 150,282 sq. ft. No Change
GRFA: 133% or 200,460 sq. ft. 118% or 176,910 sq. ft. 16% or 23,550 sq. ft.
(129,156 sq. ft. proposed) (105,606 sq. ft. proposed) 23,550 sq. ft.)
Dwelling
units per acre: 0.29 du/acre 0.29 du/acre No Change
(276 au) (99 au) - 177 au
(15 ffu) (48 ffu) + 33 ffu
(1 du) (1 du) No Change
Site coverage: 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. 62% or 92,637 sq. ft. No Change
Setbacks:
front: 12' g' -3'
sides: 5', 2', & 6' S', 2', 8 0' nc, nc, &-6
rear: 8' 5' - 3'
Height: , 85.75' slopiny 74.25' sloping - 11.5'
87.5' (arch.proj.) 93.5' (arch. proj.) + 6'
Parking: 394 parking spaces 288 parking spaces - 106 parking spaces
(246 new parking spaces)
(42 existing parking spaces)
Loading: six berths five berths - one berth
Gross Building Area: approx. 395,862 sq. ft. approx. 328,958 sq. ft. - 66,904 sq. ft.
Conference/ Meeting
Facility: approx. 21,009 sq. ft. approx. 15,338 sq. ft. - 5,671 sq. ft.
Spa Area: approx. 27,802 sq. ft. approx. 24,799 sq. ft. - 3,003 sq. ft.
F: \everyone\peclmemos\wi pc
Attachment D
.
mL E H R
:A ;`il) A:iS(!{IA1- E%, IN~ .
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
NIr. George Ruther
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel
George:
This is a written description of off-site impacts and their proposed mitigation as requested by your letter
dated 10/13/99.
A. Pedestrian Impacts -Vail Road. \Ne will be providing streetscape improvements in accorclance
with the streetscape master plan for the eastem side of Vail Road from the corner of East Meadow
Drive to the northern most property line of our site. These improvements include new "Village"
Iight Fxtures and standards, curb anii gutter, and a six-foot wide brick paver sidewalk to match the
color, pattern, and size of the exis;ting sidewalk at East Meadow Drive.. Additional landscape
improvements and final sidewalk co:nfiguration will be provided in accordance with desig.n review
zoning regulations.
B. Pedestrian Impacts - East iVteaclow Drive. T'he Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape improvements in accordance with the streetscape master plan for the northem side of
East Nleadow Drive from the comer of Vail Road to the westemmost of the Vail Village Inn Phase
IA structure to mitigate peclestrian impacts in this area. The proposed improvements include
replacement of the existing cube fixtures with new "Village" light fixtures and standards and a six-
foot wide brick paver sidewalk to m;itch the color, pattern, and size of the existing sidewalk at the
corner of East Meadow Drive and Vail Road. Additional landscape improvements and final
sidewalk configuration will be provicled in accordance with design review zoning regularions.
C. Pedestrian Impacts - South Frontage Road. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape improvements in accordance with the master plan for the southern side of the South
Frontage Road from the comer of Vail Road to the westernmost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase
V driveway to mitigate pedestrian in:lpacts in this area. The proposed improvements include new
"Village" light fistures and standards, curb and gutter, and a six-foot wide brick paver sidewalk to
matcll the color, pattern. and size af dle existina sidewalk at alon~~ the South Frontage Road.
Additional laneiscape improvements and tinal ~sidewallc contiguration will be provided in
accordance with design review and other applicable zoning. regulations as well as Colorado
Department of Transportation.
D. Pedestriau Impacts - South Frontage Road. 'The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to provide
streetscape improvements in accordance with the master plan for the southern side of the South
Frontage Road from the easternmost curb of the Vail Village Inn Phase V dnveway to the
westernmost corner of East Meadow Drive (Crossroads) to mirigate pedestrian impacts in this area.
The proposed improvements include white concrete standard curb and gutter, and a six-foot «+ide,
four-inch thick, reinforced, white concrete sidewalk. These improvements specifically esclude
utility relocation, engineered structures for retaining earth or support of the sidewalk, handrails,
. . , 111±~._. KC, ,
U( A -
'I itf_: _'i
.n .
tlcl`-.-. - iU_'jt_i})~}
•
Vail Plaza Hotel Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 10/ 19/99
guardrails, or walls meant to provide for the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk, and/or drainage
systems meant to control surface water runoff. It is assumed that the items specifically eYCluded
will be provided by another entity to be coordinated with the proposed sidewalk. Additionally it is
assumed that all improvements along the South Frontage Road will be at the discretion of the
Colorado Department of Transportation.
E. Public Transportation Impacts - East Nleadow Drive. The Vail Plaza Hotel is proposing to
. provide p.ublic transportation infrastructure improvements in accordance with the streetscape
inaster plan for a new bus stop adjacent to the westernmost portion of the Vail Village Inn Phase
lA structure to mitigate impacts in this area. The prooosed improvements relocation of fixed bus
signage and fixtures, and a bus stop similar in size, ma[erials and character to the existing bus stop
located on the south side of the roadway. Additional landscape improvements and final
c:onfiguration will be provided in accordance with design review and other applicable zoning
regulations.
It is our understanding that the existing surface water runoff from the existing structures and the proposed
structures on the site is would be in the same quantities and would drain to the same locations as currently
e:cist. Additionally, we would assume no increase in surface water on our site would occur from the design
of proposed drainage structures on the South Frontage Road. Therefore would assume that no major
drainage infrastructure improvements would be necessary to accommodate the proposed structures.
Please da not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
~
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zehren and Associates, Inc. ~
2
Z E - H ~ Pv
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
. Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Vail Plaza Hotel
George:
This a final written statement as requested by your ]etter dated 10/13/99 to address design criteria A
through I as outlived in section 18.40.080 of the town code. It is our understanding that these nine (9)
criteria are to be used in evaluating the merits of the Vail Plaza Hotel, the final phase of the Vail Village
Inn Special Development District. A. Design Compatibility. We believe that: the hotel is designed in such a way that is both compatible and
sensitive to the environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties.
Setbacks are consistent with the underlying zoning in that they maintain an average of twenty feet
(20') from most adjacent properties to t:he pnmary building walls. Additionally, the structure maintains
setbacks consistent with adjacent properties along both the Frontage Road and Vail Road.
Mass and bulk are sensitive to adjacent structures in that the hotel is designed to step up in height
and bulk from both the street and adjacent smaller structures in order to maintain a comfortable
pedestrian scale while maintaining con:sistent heights with adjacent structures roof lines and ridges.
Additionally, we have purposefully hipped most of the roof forms at or along public streets and plazas
to provide a consistent bulk plane at street level. The stepping and broken ridge lines, along with
variations in materials and wall ptanes act to break down the overall mass and bulk of the project and
relate the hotel to the surrounding neighborhood.
The architectural design is meant to be both compatible with both the Gateway building and the
remainder of the special development district while providing some identity to the hotel as both a
recognizable and viable commercial stnr.cture within the connnunity.
B. Uses, Density, and Activity. The Vail Plaza Hotel is the last phase of the Vail Village IiIn Special
Development Disfict and as such was alwavs meant to be the anchor or most densely developed
portion of the district. As a fiill service hotel. which includes conference, spa, restaurant, and
commercial activities, the hotel meant to act as a"magnet" that drativs people through the other
smaller, commercial based structures in the special development district, (including the Gateway
building). Additionally, the hotel is legally required to provide loading and delivery seivices,
autOmobile access, and parkine for the rE:mainder of the special developmerit distnct.
C. Parking and Loading. We believe our parking and loading facilities are in compliance with the
requirements of chapter 18.52. '
We are providing six (6); 12' x 25'x 14' underground loading berths. The maximum required is
five (5) 12' x 25' berths in accordance with 18.52.150. We believe our parking facilities meet required
number of spaces required by zoning chapter 18.52.
U,'..., :.r, ii- U
I
Vail Plaza Hotel Zelueri and Associates. Inc.
961070.00 10/ 19/99
D. Conf'ormity with Master Plan. We believe our development substantially complies with the goals
expressed in the various plans contained within the adopted Vail Village Master Plan.
The Larid Use Plaii indicates our site as Medium/High Density Residential and as such
recommends a lodging orientation with a limited amount of accessory retail.
We are proposing to provide an increased amount of "urban open space" or public plaza. and
buffering greenspace in the areas indicated as such in The Open Space Plan.
We believe that our project complies with the recommendations in Tlze Pafking aiid Circulation
Plaii. We are proposing an intemal connection to the Vail Gateway shared pedestrian/auto area as
indicated, an improved pedestrian connection to East Meadow Drive including new bus facilities as
indicated, and a secondary esternal pedestrian connection to Vail Road between phase ftve and our
project. Additionally we would be providing sidewalk improvements from the new bus stop on East
Meadow Drive to the Gateway on Vail Road, and Bike/Pedestrian sidewalk improvements from the
Vail Gateway to the Vail Transportation Center on the Frontage Road.
We believe that our design substantially complies with Building Heiglit Plan in that the plan
indicates buildings of five stories both to the east and west of our site along the frontage road and north
and south of our site on Vail Road. Our design maintains this four to five story relationship with our
neighbors. We feel as though the three to four story designation is inconsistent with cunent conditions
and are not applicable as they relate to our site. It is our understanding that these heights indicated in
the plan were based on preserving views to Vail Mountain from the four way stop at the Intersection of
Vai] Road and the Frontage Road prior to development of the Vail Gateway and the Roundabouts.
Because these views no longer exist with the development of the Vail Gateway as acknowledged in the
plan, and because stopping to view the mountain is actually discouraged by the movement of traffic in
the roundabout, we feel that these standards may no longer apply.
Tlie Actiott Plaii indicates our site as an area for potential residential/lodging infill in accordance
with previous town approvals with which our proposed project is consistent.
The Vail Village Sub-Areas 1-1 of the Yail Village Master Plaii indicates our site as the final
phase of SDD #6. In doing so, it identifies a series of goals, which we believe we comply with.
Item 1.2 encourages "the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities."
Item 2.3 "strongly encourages the development short term accommodation units" and recognizes that
when units are "developed above the existing density levels, they should be managed in such a way
that allows for short term ovemight rental". '
Itenr 2.4 encourages the development of new commercial infill compatible with esisting land uses.
Irern 2.6 encourages the developinent of aftordable housing units and may be required as part of any
redevelopment project requesting a density over:levels allowed by existing zoning.
Itena 3.2 recognizes the will to "reduce vehicular traffic in the village to the greatest extent possible".
Itent 4.1 encourages the irnprovement of existing open space to create new plazas with greenspace.
Itenr -5. I recognizes the need and desire to provide fer parkin~ demands on site and ~vith underground
and visually concealed parlcing.
Itetfi 61 recognizes the need to provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new
development.
E. Natural Hazards. We believe there are no natural hazards that may affect development of this site.
F. Site and Building Design. We believe we have addressed this issue by campliance with the Vail
Village Nlaster Plan.
2
Vail Plaza Hotel Zetuen and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 10/ 19/99
G. Pedestrian/Vehicular Circulation. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance with the
Vail Village Master Plan. Additionally, traffic studies indicate that vehicular circulation pattems are
considered safe and have relatively little impact on e,cistine, vehicular circulation svstems.
H. Functional and Aestlietic Landscaping. We believe we have addressed this issue by compliance
. with the Vai] Village Master Plan. Additionally, we believe we have substantially improved on the
amount and quality of publicly accessible plazas, greenspaces, and pedestrian circulation systems.
1. Pliasing Plan. The development will be constructed in one phase with completion anticipated for late
fall of 2001. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding the information presented.
Additionally, if you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
.
3
.
, . _
a ,s. , ~ 's -1 ~
_ -
- - ° ' -
, - -
~ , ° o . ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~ a~-`~ - ~
l~'1 ~ L~~~--~- ~ ~ _ i-~ - <--0~~ \ ,
V- 77
~
> -,~j~~,.-= , _ ~ x;~;~ 3~~-x~...,,, ~a ~ - -
_ ~ ~ { ~~='s ~ :y. ~ ~ .
. ~
y~~'~ ~ ~ - l~ \ ~ ~ 4~ ~~`x~ '`Y ~ - ~ C. ? ' ~
~ . . .
~ ~
~
~
. ~ -11
7n~ ~
7' K
~ '~r^ ' i t. :L.~ ~ • ~ \ , ~~i / ~ ~ ~J , _ ~ ~
CONCEP
TUAL a
BUILDING "
HEIGHT PLAN
LEGEND
n ` ~ ~ •wr:~~\ ~i., jy'4~',\~
3,4 ` ' ` 4Y
MA%IMUM RANGE OF BIALDING HEIOHT IN S70RIES VAII VILt-ACE PLAN
~tiR.~• ~4~~
A Wlldirg stay is delirred es 8 teel ol heignt s,a 4 \ ~ L
. Ino rool inclutle0l. Exact haight restrictlons' ~
will be datmminetl by zoning. Vaned roof neghts 1 1 . '
within renge soeciiled is desire tl lor each bulldm9 _e 4 omp ~`t y,I I
DENOTES EXISTINO OH APPFlOVED BUILDINGS WMGH Plan
DO NOT CAWORM TO TNE CONCEPNAL BULDING
. MEIGHT PLAN
SHFdNG OENOTES AREAS OF SIMLAR HEIGHT
. ` l \ r~
O QPP cp
~
' I
3vt:.Te~t}}~',~ E~ ~~ie~41Si:
' - _ - _ - - -
~ VIEW CORRIDORS ( ELEVATION FROM FRONTAGE ROAD 1
~
~
X~ Q~GP~~ .a~~~Q1 ,
~L
BIALDING PROFlLE FOLLOWS
GENERAL BOWL SHAPE OF
VALLEY FLOOR
ag~a '
'
I BUILDING MASSING f VILLAGE CORE SECTIONI BUILDING
HEIGHT
~ PROFILE
' VVILLAGE PLAN
own o
Y
' Comprehensive
Plan
' " ~ ,
r, S ~ .
fI ~ r
„ . . .
~
~i .d
~
~r ~
r'i,~~", a A.
w~+ F1.'~ • ~ ~a.l~+~r~ ~ 6W sl~~ 7~ kSM!~PJ
i~y~~~ia~{4da•~ 5~51 . i ~r,,.
~ iy '^t~, "•r ,~.p~'~.~ ~ ~ e ~ .
~w
~
i °
.
y "
M
~ y
y kt
3
r
0.N0 AB~OCI11TE8, ING ~
Z E H R E N vail Plaza Hotel view~ Analysis l
...~.a
!~S RM iM w C~ Im4i1
i 'W~YnY! ru IWM~sY'. ~
November 22, 1999
YI~~rN
~
•
Y
r..
F"
w .
~ ~ Md
r
e
r ~
4. *v
~
,
1
.
"
d~ ^
.
,
,
,
. j . . .
~1th?~
Rk ' II! I I u ~i
4 4ik1•-
.I
I 7h I ;d 1 ~~kv;r. r a ~ Tq~ ~rV~t'~I
~~N ~
I~i~~%~Q
O
3
y'~'~~r,'~'~s*"N~,r~
~ z EH~R E N
~ ~TE8; INC
AND A48OC7 Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 2
November 22,1999
r~
J~ .
;i
y,, ~
~
~
f
e
y a ~ ~ 1~
9 ,~,quRduQ~ 41~~ a
i ~
d'~ i Y~p Piq~'~ dy't
I
,
1 Y
,
d„
"
~ T~'~'",~,u~
~
.
~
~
. '
~
, W4^4,4
. , . w~ ~ ya ~Ylh~ ~ .r
. & p~f OF,
• ~~~~~Sn~R~~~~
? ~ .~~r' ! ~r ~'k~ ~ >~`~~e
Yi ay R~'J
ifi~~ zviW e~ ro ~ r s4~~s . yrs~ fy Ry .r~ ~ . a .
> 'i'~ # ~ r ~s,~ i ~ ~ a r'~' 1* a2~€~,•~t'~+.~4~.'~",~~~{~~. r
dGr
AVNMZEHREN
~ AND~SBOCIATES. 1MC.
Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 3 "
rrwow . ~.re.cu~ re.~rGtruar ,.;u;.
November 22, 1999
ws~~
;
a
M~+
y~
,
~
k~ ~ M ~ M' L
N{~~'~~K," ~F +'T,r fi~y,~s~~'~} "4...
. a- . . , . - .
. . . . . z ~ Z E CH R E N VaYI plaza :Hotel View Analysis 4
~ ANO ASBQCIA~t9. INC
te r~w.wi~¢
.v.~.,..
November 22, 1999
~
.
rg
~ ~ i r x r
„
Y y
~
~'n!
J ~
~ • 1 ' ~ ~ 5 . , ~ ...r ~
wM f I h
W
~
~ Ifi F
z
a a ~ !
.,7 ~;,a4
~
~'~Y~~t.~~ 9 r' .f~V~ f .:~:1„ pi, •6F{ ~ u~ , t~S~, EofP~r`,~
~~~~6~~
.,H~~ , ~ °kn;. , , h~r;~ ~ . M1r fi~Iww:rP:r~,,I r 4~,•
~ ;
,
Mp"
~4d~~~'"'f~.,~ G~ t,`.1 ...~'~''.h ~ fnr .,..,.;.)rr ~~I~..N~,~~,~~"v~ .n, ~ ~0 ~.^~.,.ri .,M. iln ~1,.'a~ at,~,.1,..1~ f:;~... 9rr,:~~.~~ ,~-:~~'~1isa ~.+d~'~ ~~`~'"..r.
~i..
„ ,u , ~ 4 a, ~ , ~.,,r ~ r~ ,vw; P ~ ~ F.a w ~ , e S. , f • w ,,1 i w~",
p~y~~ ~~~~.v.~ .n.,.'3. .ns. S~'*"~a ~~ia,i.~'~~,. f 4 '~i+~,,.,..,s~'~,.s~u .ra~.ir~. ~ ,wm~~ ~..::u~4~ ~•,ri~.~~4 pu,r~r"~ iY'~.~:.*,t,•~~
5~.... .r, r~~-,.,,.~ .l. ~,~,'~f~t, r"~.m.•~.~..a~ti '~~:i~,~.~.~,,11~,., y ~~^S,~r7 ~ipi.. i ~b~1~'~~ ~J.~,.~~~ a~+'.~'7 ,.~~~.r. • ~`w~d.~~•~~.la,.~
r. ,...~.uw.~i.F°. • ~ ~..,E Re ~VF.~~... ,~a4'.,r~t.,t'v"~,i C~'~.~."~P.h~.. ~'~..~,Fa I.fne~.,_~ .~~{~..~'7W ~':a,+,~:~l.,u. A..~.. . .?.r ~l'94 . .,f'Vf,S.„.
.,i~. - . ~..i ^ rx~ ~A",, r : ,M.:.. ~e~ ~,..,e~ ",'C.~ ~ ° .,5•:.~ t~ ~ ~ '~..r.:.~t v'~.,. Y~~~ ~ ~R".iv ~
[MO ASSpCUTEB, INC
2 E H R E N Vail Plaza ~-Iotel ViewAnatysis 5
rew~a.~~r~. qrrw~w,
November 22, 1999 F
i
;
.'M
~
, , ,
M . k I P I II
Y T ~ ~ ~t~ 4~ ~ a~
t ,-4V t . f~ A7~ .
~
r . '
. s
, . .
k 1
x~
''~~~~5
r
, i
l IR
~ •
~I)I'•4
l f ~1 .IL~IG
8
; re ` ~a.a..~.,.,.~' ~"dNI;`,+ ~..~.'~•a. ~I~~ k
~y r~qnt" arv : ~1~
. ~
kh 5~"m~ ~P v
e f
RJ4`+;Y~':r~
c. t h
. , ~
~
,
116.
e µ
. wG a~ i ~ .e . + ~ , • _
~ ~N6ASSOCIATE9. INC
~ Z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 6
November 22, 1999
,
i
wl9!G,~
~
H
y'SJ~ I
Y
6 ~'hi.r4l~rb1 f~ .
W
G.,. ~ R ' t~ y4 €
.
.
` e
.f
~
~ k
~4 f1h N u,~ i ' .
~I~~
~~l
ia~' ~
%
kd ~^fS ~ 9 tl ry~ n
'~r. ~
. ~ ' . , S~, . . .
ru a . ~ , °r . ~ r.~ ~~';,i ~t~ lik ~ ~::~t ~~y S f+~ rl~ . . , , 4 j.. . sl.. . nl~e. . ~~I§ ~ ~ Is , r.. k~~~. ~ i ~ I. ~ri.lp~dh ,.~j• .
.I . . .
1Nn aseos:i~res, rwc.,
z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel View Analysis 7
~arr•u.~w•~ ~reNw~~
November 22, 1999
rn.q:r~
, , ~ a•'~_
1M+~
~.:".,M:
I.~ u
u7 p711v...
rt .
'y• ,i
~
~ ~ ir~ w •
. . .
,
.
. .
~ • .
e . ,
, , _ ~ ~ , r. + . • ~ . ~ .
: , , _ . r
c~~y
~ ANO A980CIRtEB. INC
~ z E H R E N vail Plaza Hotel . vieW Analysis g
w<.r~ ~l4~ u~f . n~ MYnD
T~/pRf .6+ROlCNII ~ti:lci((.~W [
VqW4V ~M 4~TMI~.nY
November 22, 1999
!
A~
fl
a
_
~iiPl
h 7 i r , • .
RIK
p
°
.
. . I . . w ,
~ e..~~ ..c. ~a- . ...r.
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' }~~J r ~ a~'~,y ' F.. ~i' - f y~` a~ '•y;
• ~ ~i . t''~-9;.~, . ~ ~
,
~
41,
.
.
, ~ .
, .
.
~ Z E~HR~E N '
AMO A860GI -IlTES. IN0. Vall Plaza Hotel View Analysis 9
November 22,1999 ~
~
A
N ~ ~ E' ~ F
I, ~~q4~'h r~~~3~ji7'F~~~~ ~~~~F I~~~~44~ ~N~'.ci~N M ~:I~I ~M~ °...A Jau,~, ;i:;.. ~4 ~ ~M ::i, ry ,f . • r
~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ 7a Su *w~e
~ q I~rf r , h I y
V
, :i,... .
y .
4
I 5
.
J..
N
.1, . ! . . ' .
4
~ v
~
~
w
~A
z Es H R E N
NO~ soci r wc Vail Plaza Hotel sun Shade Analysis
Proposed Structure
November 22,1999
December 21 - l0am ,i
~ . . . . .
~
t ~ M
~
~ ^a~'
~t
N~
h xi •
a
~ il 4 J
N
Y! T*~5"~~~i . '
, , A~„~d~„.,
~ AHO; ssacIArEs. iHc
~ z E H R E N Vail. Plaza Hotel sun Shade Analysis
~~t.~~...r....~»o
Proposed Structure
I~~IMC aal] sa~ n!kYy mq
November 22,1999
Uecember 21 - 2pm
. . :t
r 9 C C f 1 ' ~
a
ry .r.~ s 4, ,f r h m ~~f , e~ , r r•~ i ~ u'. ,JrX~~, u M1,~'i r+~i~r°d ~,h :r,t',
,rd 5 s~`s~"a., ~ ,
nr~~;rft'~, a ..~k fi'.Y'• y~ ~r'~.,~ ~ {~~~a~s ,i.i~'f 1~~~~~~,v, i~y~~ ~~;a:~k r~9~.^3a'Wh~ tp~y ~vi.~r~iF~~IF~~~ ~r,Qt~^iF~yka~ ;~d~s 'i~'i ~~~~~i,~~~~~~ ~r r~4~~€~'~'~~Iiq~j~K~'Ia9C`~~IMI~~~.~.~
It,
a mrh 3~ ~ ~ 9 ~
r d'~r9„~~'s~F~~`~~a~'~~~~{i~~"~a.~;~~.~ s I~+~.. ~ ~~w Tr~ ~w ,,,~~i, i,ti ~ y G~~" ~°~j~~","~~~~~u~~~ r~ trry -
„,.m ~ ~ ~.~~;~a~,~ ~r ~d t a. ~ ~~w.. , r.i.
~J' . ,q;,„ ,~d k I ~~.4u9 ti~ v~,a~x,.` i ras :,;•d ~h~ :r, ~ , , ~ , ~ , . . I11~,G
ha~~l ~ `~`kP" i ~~F~ ~~i ~~~i qrh'~ ~~dk~ , ~ ' . m,,,.. • .n x , ~ . 4 ~r~r h+i,~: ~ ` ~ ~~~~~~~~r; Nry~'~: t~~; ."`~'r "~1~~°~ ` ~ a4 ~
a F ~ ~ p~yN~
..................~~aiw~~~~~y"
i ~~r w~[" + dm r F >.r
r ~
r Pr 4~ r~• ~
- r
a
~
^ ~
. ~ ~
x , a
r
.
~ ~ ~1~° `~a N i ~ ~ ~M • . ' ' a ~v
. ~gP f,~'~i iFA'~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ ~~r r n' ~'J...
v
p~
h~~~~~~:c
- i A8i
Yr k 'aT J ..H . . , ~ ~ ~iM%i~"~'
. „~'+F"11a..~,K
~ z°ES°"RE4EM1 N vail Plaza Hotel Sun Shade Analvsis
Gr? r~„~~.~...
November 22,1999 Proposed Structure
~..r~.
June 21 - l0am
~
•
i y ~ W ~l~~~ 5 . ~~.t~ ' i, . m!~ . .r°~ ~ ~ , 7~ ~F~~!~k
~ i
i N f • ~ f ~I ` ~ n ~ 'A i.. . . . , . . i~. , . ~ `S .
41
i ~ x
1 as
ai.F ~ a Y! r~ ~5 5 w
w
~"r 1
r
M
M~
~
~I
~
~ AzNO AESMSOHC'IARiES. E INC 1
N Vail Plaza Hotel Sun ShadeAnalysis
a.iw+n
Proposed Structure
•YMM9W r ru IsiV p1~ ~P~
~
November 22,1999
June 21 - 2pm
' R
~
~ . I ' ' . .
r^^
'M
A
dv:•~,'± ~hCM % a vi ~„~i r i~i ~YM t 1~~ t l
~u ' r
pf ~'~;~e~ ~t 'Fv~~.P{~r!~ rT" ~r ky sal'y~kyln 4~dSw ~H~ ~n
.;L~ 1 ,.,d .7Cw~.~'7 J
~ ~ ~ N r~ ""~4~~.~' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~;*~~4 4:w.~.a ~ 9~., 3N`~~+ 4 ~ i~ ea . ; ~,,tk,w~a~i~~k%~.~j~~,y.,". . - , ~tl~''Tt =~Y a
~ s~w ~ ~k+ I r &3~a ' y r * ~ .
~~I~ uir y~ ~f
P .
~ £ r ~ • ~~~p~C~~x ~
°ryx ~
~ xaaaxl. a
p g:, 4r~s ~ ~
, . ,
~ , ~
r,
~I~P~., { _
:
. . . . F . e . . . . ~ . _ .a. . idywr.kr;:.
~ AN!)uA65DCIATES. IHC.
z E H R E N Vail Plaza Hotel Sun Shade Analysis
~ ~ar~c.ua .wi~Mw+«a
Proposed Structure
November 22,1999 '
" March 21 - 10am
. ' . ~ . . '~..7.J'a
, . . ~:r:•
. ~
. 4 C' i
r ~ i" t ~sy i'~ k.: r ~ y~s TM~w e
r ~ i ~ x ~C ~ r ! ~ ~ it r 4 ~ , i ~ "°g~' ""''Yr` { ~°,:v k^"~"1 .
W ~a I ~d 7 } . 1
i hi i t a~~ ~ ~~.i~~~u ~k l:~~~~' .ls:a y.,.9w'~~'~~r~~~~~ 9~~ r v~"*ik~'~'b:~y ,~~a^~~~ ' ~ i:'~'~~S k~~~~ ~r r,~ . n,~.
f ~ m~ ~ d n ~ I~ m ~F 3.. a~q , ~4i s , ~ ~
r a^y,y, r" ~ ~td'~,~ ~-a~r ~ r.+a 7 c r, y~..7~ c~, ~y" 1F', "
Z r i a~ 'w,~r°~ a1# M~d~, f'~ F ~ t Ai Ir
Aa i ~h 4'~~ C~ "~a r ~ r ~r ~v t i ~ "~..,,i.~',`~~~'et'~,d+~ ~k~9,'~~,` k,i
~ N y h~ §+7 ~ a~ i~ '~"~~r~ ~ ~ ~ w . ~r T.,~. r . iW "3'~ ; r. ~
-S a i i . ~at~ ~ d4 ~ ~ rzs~ ~ ~ ~~i~a V*. .
k~~ ~~'~?'+d ~ P e ~ -~as ~t~~wr'~r.~h~ ~~k4~i ~ i d' .
3. u~~ r w ~ ~ rt~
~,~I~F~ ~~~'~~p~.V rr a~~. yj~ s~~~~~'~~ F': vp,~~'y! ~I'~f,~~J~~
g[*'~ f ,~a5~'I ~ r i i h 5p~~ r~ ~ ~a h~ k .'.it~~ w~~~
' t' t ~i ~ 3~ ~ C~ ~ ~ %I ti, ~.w..di u~.,.s ~I .
a~~ i ~ I'~~ I~ ~ ~I"F~'* i~ ii ~ F.x~ r~~ ry Sh . k i~ . , ...~w i,~~..e , , ~ . ,2 ~ . . .
~ 4 + ~~y hF~a P~ 1~ ~ ~i ai ~~~N ~~r."~ a - T~ , _ , . . d~"iq1~~l~ .
} P u ~ ry I
- t ~ ~ .I*'~ ~ ~ r " h 9~ ~
~ ~ i~
~tl~~~~ rk~ ~ ~ ~ ~s 4~ ~ I~~
d
~,'"I~~~ ~ ~ . p'~ ~
~ I~
~
t~~
b ~ i~;:4 ,I
~ I~s
f~~ a ~i ~ ~
~ ~9 ~ . ,
a~~h
~u ~r ~ ~ ~~~.~r~~~
~ ' ~ ri_ s .
~ y ~ -
~~f6 ~~'y ~y~ V
~I! ~l~ A~ ~~~~~Vk~~~~~2 N 4 ~ d~,~I,S~~k~N~~Y ~f~'•;; . ^M1 v
I,y R ~ M I I' ~jsl ~ pr ~ 4 r~I ,6
~9~ u~ ~ ~~'~I~~`s~~~ ',S ~ p~~ { ~ -
~ ~ ~ tl
;.;1ri{~p kiiRi~~ i~;° ~'ix~ mP~
~ Olli ~ri
~7h '~y~~; ~~P ; E"' ~td
,~r ~ ~ i
~
. , ,
~
;'r'~ ~ "
t
,3.
~ i!
~I "I
I
~ I ~i~ ~ ~ I ~~I
~ li ~ i~ , i ~ ,
r I, ~ I 'I ~
~ , a~, ;''•&,W . . . ~ . . .
~ ANDn4µ50~1ATF.§: ~~NC
~ z E H R E N vail Plaza Hotel Sun ShadeAnalysis
n~~`~~'~ Proposed Structure
November 22, 1999
y March 21 - 2pm
' ~
,
Attachment H
BAILEY & PETERSON
A PROt?MONAL CORPORATiON
ATroEUVm AT Lnw
WB.STS I'ALt BANK BLDG. I.INCOLN CEMBR Y.O. BOX !s9
108 SOUTFI FRONTAGE ROAD WBST, SUTfE 204 16601.INCOLN STRSEC, SU1TE 3175 429 BDWARDS ACCBSS ROAD, SUITE ZOCi
VAiI., COLORADO 81657 DIENVER, COLORADO 80264 BDWARDS, COLORADO 81632
TBLBPHONH (970) 476-0092 7'EI.SPHONE (303) 837-1660 TELfiPHO1V6 (970) 9264255
FACSIIVIILB (970) 4764)099 1FACSI1bQLE (303) 837-0097 FACSIMILH (970) 426A296
MEMORA1dTDUM TO: George Ruther
FROM: Jay K. Peterson
DATE: October 19, 1999
RE: Vail Plaza Hotel
Dear George:
The purpose of this memo is twofold. First, to set forth our employee housing proposal
and, second, to explain the fractional fee concept.
1. Emplovee Housing. Attached to this meYnorandum is our Vail Plaza Hotel
staff'ing requirements set forth by departments. The chart I believe is self-explanatory. As you
can see, rather that full-time versus part-time, we have used work hours per year which I believe
is a more accurate way to calculate staffing requirements. We have calculated our existing
staffing requirements the same way, in o.rder to anive at a net increase in employees for the new
hotei. This net increase is 105 employees.
Our proposal is to provide housing for 30% of these employees. Ideally, from our
standpoint, we would like to provide all housing within the Town of Vail. However, because of
limited opporlunities within the Town, we would request the option to provide the housing
outside the Town limits, if necessary. The numbers would be the same whether inside or outside
the Town.
2. Fractional Fee. T'he Vail Plaza Hotel will contain forty-seven dwelling units
which will be operated and managed by the owner of the Vail Plaza Hotel. The hotel would sell
a maximum of twenty-eight prime winter and/or summer weeks with the hotel managing and
operating those weeks for the owners. The remaining twenty-four weeks would remain with the
'i
ti
- ownership of the hotel and would be managed and operated the same as the hotel. There would
be an obligation that the weeks remaining under the ownership of the hotel be available only as a
"short-term rental," the same as any hotel room. The number of owners would be limited to a
minimum of six and a maximum of twelve, pursuant to zoning requirements.
If you have any questions, please call.
Jay K. Peterson
Attachment
2
.~I I I P,rr WcI nImIaO u anu aCabUnavpaR-Ume) Page 1
,
A B C D E F G H
PERMANENT STAFF SEASONAL PART-TIME
HELP
° woric
VPH t hours/ maxi-
FUNCTIONS e Pertna- year = Work mum
by department _ nent 40 hours peak work
staff. hsJweek per days hours
1 employees x 50 peak per per
2 - (note 1) wk/year day year year
3 Lod4inq (hotel & Club)
4 General Manager -1 2,000
5 Assistant manager 4 8,000
6 Guest relations 2 4,000 16 92 1,472
7 Front Office 8 16,000 24 92 2,208
8 Concierge 2 4,000 8 92 736
9 Bell man 2 4,000 48 92 4,416
10 PBX 3 6,000 16 92 1,472
11 Reservations 3 6,000
12 Sales 8 Marketing 4 8,000
13 Accounting 6 12,000
14 Housekeeping supervisor 2 4,000
15 maid service 2 15 30,000 40 92 3,680 .
16 Engineering 9 18,000 24 92 2,208
17 Garage O erations 3 6,000 16 92 1,472
18 Lodging (hotel 8, Club) 64 128,000 17,664
' 9 Food & Beverage (F86)
,0 manager+host 3 6,000 16 92 1,472
F22 waiters+busboy(1:3 waiters) 11 13 26,000 40 92 3,680
ba
r 3 6,000 8 92 736
23 kitchen 16 32,000
24 Room Service: 4 8,000 16 92 1,472
25 Food & Beverage (F$B) 39 78,000 7,360
26 Conference Center 3 3 6,000 8 92 13,248
27 Health Club/SPA
28 reception 4 8,000
29 up keeping 4 8,000 16 92 1,472
30 therapist 482 10 20,000 16 92 1,472
31 exercise room 2 4,000
32 Health Club/SPA 2 20 40,000 2,944
33 Retail (3 shops 6 12,000 16 92 1,472
34 GRAND TOTALS: 132 264,000 42,688
35 hours/year % 100% 16%
36 Average part time help work hours/peak day 464 92 42,688
37 One full time work hours/year 2,000
38 o a pa - ime equiva en o u ime 5 21 39 Grand Total full time equivalent 153
40 Average hours/part time employee/peak day 6 4
41 Number of part time names =(avg hs.per peak day)/(hs/da 7 116
+2 notes
43 continue
44
45
_ vrn vI r%rr WaIllinilviu nllu aabauilnupaii-urnC) F'898 "L "
A B C D E F G H
46 note 1: includes "day off" coverage were applicable. ~
47 note 2: Maid service is based on 10 occupied rooms/maid. Minor occasional fluctuations in
3 demand (less than 100% occupancy) will be covered with overtime of the permanent staff.
49 note 3: Occasional large banquettes will be serviced by the Conference waiter staff and the two shifts
50 restaurant and kitchen staff in over time.
51 note 4: Same therapist may cover more than 1 of the 14 treatment rooms for some treatments.
52 note 5: The total 42,688 seasonal work hoursJyear divided by the regular one fult
53 time employee 2,000 hours/year is = 21 equivalent full time
54 employees.
55 note 6: it is a typical hoursJpeak day of a part time helper.
56 note 7: it is the total part time "names" on the payroll. Evidently depends on the average part-time hoursJpeakday
57
e equiv WI inCrea-
58 Employee Totals VPH WI equiv." se
59 full time 132 132 42 42
60 part time 116 21 32 7
61 total 248 153 74 49
62 * part time at same ratio as VPH .
63
64 VPH STAFFING IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
65 uses note units quant
66 Hotel units 97
67 Club units 46
68 Hotel + Club 8 units 143
'9 Hotel 8 Club YEAR occupancy 750/o
, 0 persons/occupied unit 1.75
71 Hotel + Club population 9 persons 188
72 maid service occup rms/maid 10
73 walk in for lunch or dinner 10 customers/function/day 80
74 Restaurant & bar 11 sf 3,613
75 kitchen 11 sf 3,200
76 Conference 11 sf 7,004
77 Health Club/SPA 17 sf 7,009
78 Retail 11 sf 3,550
79
80 highest demand for restauranUday
81 note lunch dinner
82 hotel 8 Club guests 12 1 1 per 3 nights stay.
83 serves/fundion/day 48 48
84 Walk in customers/functioNday
85 serves/fundion/day 10 80 ers/fundioNday
86 Total serves/function/day 13 128 128 13 serves/waiter/function
87 breakfast is buffet type, served by the same lunch staff.
88 note 8: Hotel 8 Club are staffed as a unified operation
89 note 9: population for the specified number of units, occupancy, persons/room.
90 note 10: all hotel restaurants off the main pedestrian traffic (Ludwig, The Vllager, etc.) rarely (if ever) achieve a high
91 walk in demand.This 80 serves/function/day is a very high assumption.
92 note 11.: all these uses are staffed based on real demand and not based on sq.ft., or seats or any other parameter.
93 note 12: It is established in the business that the restaurant at the hotel never captures more than 1 lunch
4 and 1 dinner per ' 3 nights stay. It is part of guests program to dine out in
95 other restaurants. Vail is plenty of those.
96 note 13: The low ratio of 13 serves/waiteNshift/day indicates that this staff can serve
97 more than 2 times this demand.
mwUmum nvLiuAYb Arvu rtAK WEEK ENDS
° 1999 days/ days/peak days
holida winter * holida s wk.end total
veterana 11-Nov 3
• Thanksgiving 25-NOV 3
2-Dec
9-Dec
16-Dec
chrisfims 7
NewYear 7
6-Jan
Luther K 13-Jan 3
20-Jan
Ash 3
Linc,Val,Pre ]1[3
3
StPatrick 3
K
3
3
Good Fri OEM
7-Apr
winter total 35 12 47
Independence 3
3
3
3
3
3
summer total 3 15 18
14Apr
21-Apr
2&Apr
Mother's 5-May 3
Armed Forc 12-May
19-May ,
Memorial 26-May 3
2-lun
GrandParen 9-Jun
Father's 16,1un 3
23tilun 3
12 Aug 3
19-Aug 3
26-Aug
2-Sep
9-Sep
Yom Kipur 16-Sep 3
23-Sep
3aSep
Columbus 7-Od 3
140ct
21-Oct
Halloween 28-Oct 3
4-Nov
18 9 27
ear total , ~ ~ 9
' Attachment I
,
Vail Plaza Hotel
Parking Analysis
(revised 12/13/99)
Table 1: A Comparison of the Parking Requirements for Phase /V
Use Area Factor S aces
Dwelling.Unit 5,499 sq. ft. >2,000 sq. f.t
Town 2.5
Vail Plaza Hotel 2.5
Fractional Fee Ciub 64,094 sq. ft. 500<2,000 sq. ft./>2,000 sq. ft.
Town 96.5
Vail Plaza Hotel 96.5
Accommodation Units 36,013 sq. ft. 0.4 spaces/unit + 0.1 spaces/100 sq.ft.
Town 75.6
Vail Plaza Hotel 75.6
Restaurant 5,775 sq. ft. 1 space/8 seats
Town 48.1 _
1 space/101.9 sq. ft. Vail P/aza Hotel 56.7
Retail 4,047 sq. ft. 1 space/300 sq. ft.
Town 13.5
Vail Plaza Hotel 13.5
Conference/Meeting Rooms 10,368 sq. ft. 1 space/16 seats
Town 43.2
Vail P/aza Hotel 43.2
Subtotal (a)
Town of Vail Requirement 279.4
Vail P/aza Hotel Pro osa/ 288
Table 2: Existing Parking Requirements for Phases l, I!, lll, 8 V
Existing SDD parking spaces (Phases 1,2,3 & 5) 112
SDD Parking Deficit per Ordinance 75
Previously applied multi-use credit 2.5% 4,7
Subtotal (b)
Parking requirement for Phases 1,2,3 & 5 191.7
Table 3: Total Parking Requirement for all Phases of SDD #6
(a + b- existing spaces to remain) x multiple use credit = Grand Total
Town of Vail Requirement (279.4 + 191.7 - 42) x 0.9 = 386.2
Vail P/aza Hotel Proposal (288.0 + 191.7 - 42) x 0.9 = 393.9
Vail Plaza Hotel Are? SummarY . Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 . • 12/13/99
Proeram Area Level -2 Level -1 Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Leve13 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Total , GrossArea 53,524.00 57,696.00 51,428.00 44,623.00 37,857.40 32,877.00 26,763.00 16,146.00 8,044.00 328,958.00
Dwelling Unit , 3,446.00 2,053.00 5,499A0 '
ClubiJnit 3,822.00 13,966.00 16,163.00 14,390.00 9,801.00 4,718.00 62,860.00
Accommodation Unit 7,415.00 12,396.00 9,504.00 6,698.00 36,013.00
Retail 3,442.00 605.00 4,047.00 '
I.abbY 2,237.00 2,237.00
Restaurant 3,873.00 3,873.00
1.ounge/Bar 674.00 1,228.00 1,902.00 -
Conference 3,364.00 7,004.00 10,368.00
Pre-Conviene 2,485.00 2,485.00 4,970.00
Kitchen 0.00
Food and Beverage 0.00
Front Office 2,242.00 2,202.00
Sales/Cater. (multi-use) 0.00
Accounting 1,570.00 1,570.00
Executive Office 0.00 •
Receiving/Storage - 0.00
Personnel (office) 0.00
Service Areas 7,971.00 6,318A0 6,444.00 20,733.00
Laundry 0.00
Housekeeping 0,00 ,
Engineering 0.00
Mechanicai (Plant) 0.00
Mechanical (Rooftop) 117.00 222.00 339.00
S a Lock
P( ers) 3,116.50 3,019.00 6,135.50 1
Spa (7'reatment) 2,853.00 2,447.00 5,300.00
Pool Deck 6,266.00 1,392.00 7,658.00
Pool Area 2,774.00 2,774.00
fixercise Rooms 1,246.00 1,686.00 2,932.00 Comdor (public) 225.00 2,328.00 3,740.00 5,795.00 4,342.00 4,359.00 2,912.00 1,592.00 0.00 25,293.00 ,
Corridar (service) 0.00
Core (elevator) 150.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 151.00 150.00 1,726.00
Core (stair) 285.00 568.00 568.00 466.00 367.00 360.00 269.00 0.00 0.00 2,883.00
Parking (spaces, ramp) 51,462.00 21,498.00 10,273.40 4,114.00 87,347.00 Club Unit Storage Area 0.00
Restrooms/Coats/Etc. 589.00 589.00 589.00 1,767.00 Loading Dock 10,501.00 10,501.00
Service SmraBe 0.00
Maid (Satellitel 0_00 0.00 0.00 192.00 344.00 342.00 344.00 0.00 0.00 - 1.7,22.00 ~
Sub-Total Net Areas 52,122.00 55,45050 49,921.00 41,205.00 35,679.00 30,678.00 24,763.00 14,990.00 7,143.00 312,151.50
Gross-Net (wall) Area 1,402.00 2,245.50 1,507.00, 3,418.00 2,118.00 1,999.00 2,000.00 1,156.00 901.00 16,806.50 '
Gross-Net Factor 97% 96% 97% 92% 94% 94% 93% 93% . 89°k 95°/a
~ i
Page IS
,
Vail Plaza Hotel Leve16 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/ 13/99
Leve16
Gross Square Footage 8,044.00
Dwellina Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Dwelling Unit (upper level) 2,053.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 42 ([Jpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 43 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.Q0 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 44 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 45 (Upper Level) 648.00 108.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 47 (LJpper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 48 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
SuMTotal Club 4,718.00 843.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 12.00
Corridor (public) 0.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Maid 0.00
Core (stair) 0.00
Mechanical (rootion) 222.00
Sub-Total Area 372.00 ,
Dwelling Unit Net 2,053.00
Club Unit Net 4,718.00
Other Net 372.00
Total Net 7,143.00
NeUGross Difference 901.00 89%
Page 1
Vail Piaza Hotel Leve15 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Level 5
Gross Square Footage 16,146.00
Dwelline Unit Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Dwelling Unit (lower level) 3,446.00 340.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Area Kevs Bedtooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 34 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 35 (Upper I.evel) 814.00 ] 47.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 36 (Upper Levei) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 37 (Upper I.evel) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 39 (Upper Level) 814.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 42 (Lower Leve]) 913.00 0.00 2.00 100 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 43 (Lower Level) 979.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 44 (Lower Level) 486.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 45 (Lower Leve]) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 47 (Lower Level) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 48 (Lower Level) 992.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club 9,801.00 735.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 32.00
Other Areas Area
Corridor (pubtic) 1,592.00
Core (elevator, mech. shaft) 151.00
Maid 0.00
Core stav 0.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 1,743.00
Dwelling Unit Net 3,446.00
Club IJnit Net 9,801.00
Other Net 1,743.00
Total Net 14,990.00
NeUGross Difference 1,156.00 93%
Page 2
~
I Vai) Plaza Hotel Leve14 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
~ Level4
~ Gross Square Footage 26,763.00
Club Units
Unit Number Area Deck Areai Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 20 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 21 (Upper L.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 22 (Upper L.evel) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 27 (Upper Level) 790.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 28 (LTpper Level) 790.00 147.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 29 (Upper Level) 1,313.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 34 (Lower Level) 513.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 35 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 36 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 37 (Lower Level) 1,034.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 38 (Flat) 984.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 39 (Lower Level) 980.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
$ub-Total Club 14,390.00 1,215.00 25.00 21.00 3.00 48.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area
Unit Type A 372.11 18.00 6,698.00
Other Areas Area
Corridor (public) 2,912.00
Care (elevator) 150.00
Maid 344.00
Core stair 269.00
Sub-Total Ot6er Areas 3,675.00
Club Unit Net 14,390.00
Accorrnnodation Net 6,698.00
Other Net 3.675.00
Total Net 24,763.00
NeUGross Difference 2,000.00 93%1
Page 3
Vail Plaza Hotel Level 3 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Leve13
Gross Square Footage 32,877.00
Club Units
Unit Type Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 20 (Lower L.evel) 561.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 21 (Lower Level) 1,088.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 22 (Lower I.evel) 995.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 23 (Flat) 991.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit24 (Flat) 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Uttit 27 (Lower Level) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 28 (Lower Level) 979.00 94.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Ciub Unit 29 (LowLr Level) 969.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
ClubUnii31 (Flat) 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1.226.00 93_00 2_00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club Uuits 16,163.00 1,400.00 30.00 23.00 7.00 60.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area
Unit Type A 365.54 26.00 9,504.00
Other Areas
Maid 342.00
Corridor (public) 4,359.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Core stair 360.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 5,211.00
Totals
Club Net 16,163.00
Accommodation Net 9,504.00
Other Net 5,211.00
Total Net 30,878.00
NedGross Difference 1,999.00 94%
Page 4
~ Vail Plaza Hotel Level 2 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
II Leve12
j Gross Square Footage 37,857.00
Club Units
Unit Tvae Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 5(F7at) 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 8(Flat) 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 9(F7at) 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 11 (Flat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1.222.00 40_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club Units 13,966.00 1,235.00 27.00 17.00 10.00 54.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area
Unit Type A 364.59 34.00 12,396.00
Other Areas Maid 344.00
Corridor (public) 4,342.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Core (stair) 367.00
Rooftop Deck 4,114.00
Sub-Total Other Areas 9,317.00
Totals
Club Net 13,966.00
Accommodation Net 12,396.00
Other Net 9317.00
Total Net 35,679.00
Net/Gross Difference 2,178.00 94%
Page 5
Vail Plaza Hotel Level 1 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Level l
Gross Square Footage 44,623.00
Club Units
Unit Tvpe Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studio Pillows
Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 3(Flat) 1.237.00 95_00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Sub-Total Club Units 3,822.00 319.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 14.00
Accomodation Units Ave. Area Kevs Total Area
Unit Type A 353.10 21.00 7,415.00
Retail Area
Retail Three 605.00
Retait Four 0.00
Sub-Total Retail 605.00
Restau['ant Area Occ. Factor Occuoants
Main Restaurant (Buffet) 2,155.00 18.00 119.72
Suecialtv Restaurant 1.718.00 25.00 68.72
Sub-Total Restaurant 3,873.00 188.44
Lounee Area Occ. Factor Occunants
Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12
Other Areas
Corridor (public) 5,795.00
Kitchen/Service 6,444.00
Truck Dock/Auto Circ. 10,501.00
Restrooms 589.00
Maid 192.00
Core (elevator) 275.00
Core stair 466.00
SuMTotal Other Areas 24,262.00
Totals
Club Net 3,822.00
Accommodation Net 7,415.00
Retail Net 605.00
Restaurant Net 3,873.00
Lounge Net 1,228.00
Other Net 24,262.00
Total Net Area 41,205.00
NeUGross Di[ference 3,418.00 92%
Page 6
I Vail Plaza Hotel Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Level 0
Gross Square Footage 51,428.00
Retail
Retail One 1,702.00
Retail Two 1,740.00
Sub-Total Retail 3,442.00
Lobbv Bar Area Occ. Fact. Occua•
I.obby Baz 674.00 25.00 26.96
Lobbv Area Occ. Fact. Occua•
Lobby 2,237.00 30.00 74.57
Administration
Front Desk 2,202.00
Accountine 1,570.00
Total Administration 3,772.00
Saa - Men's/Workout
Men's Lockers/Facilities 3,019.00
Treatment 2,447.00
Deck 1,392.00
Exercise/Workout 1,686.00
Sub-Totsl Spa 8,544.00 ,
Conference Area Occ. Factor Occunants
Main Bailroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93
Pre-convene 2.485.00 7.00 355.00
Sub-Total Coofereoce 9,489.00
Service Areas 6,318.00
Exterior Circulation
Covered Ramp (North) 1,008.00
Covered Auto Entry (West) 5,772.00
Uncovered Entry (West) 1,696.00
Auto Ramp (South) 978.00
Pedestrian Access (East) 819.00
Total 10,273.00
Other Areas
Restrooms 589.00
Core (elevator) 275.00
Core (Stair) 568.00
Comdor(Public~ 3,740.00
Total Other Areas 5,172.00
Parkine Provided
Valet Spaces 5.00
Page 7
i
i
~
I, Vail Plaza Hotel Level 0 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
~ 961070.00 12/13/99
I
I
Totals
Retail Net 3,442.00
Bar Net 674.00
Lobby Net 2,237.00
Administration Net 3,772.00
Spa Net 8,544.00
Confetence Net 9,489.00
Service Net 6,318.00
Exterior Circulatiott Net 10,273.00
Other Net 5.172.00
Total Net 49,921.00
NebGross Difference 1,507.00 97%
Page 8
Vail Plaza Hotel Level -1 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/ 13/99
Levei Minus One
Gross Square Footage 57,696.00
Ssa Area
Women's Lockers/Facilities 3,116.50
Treatment 2,853.00
Deck Area 6,266.00
Exercise/Workout 1,246.00
Pool Area 2,774.00
Sub-Totai Spa 16,255.50
Conference Area Occ. Factor, Occuaants
Breakout 3,364.00 15.00 224.27
Pre-convene 2.485.00 7.00 355.00
Sub-Total Conference 5,849.00
Service 7,971.00
Other Areas
Mechanical 0.00
Corridor(Public) 2,328.00
Core (elevator) 275.00
Core (stair) 568.00
Public Restrooms 589.00
Sub-Total 3,760.00
Parkine Provided SpBCes Area Area/Suace
Valet Spaces 7.00
Parking Spaces (Full Size) 41.00
Parking Spaces (Compact) 11_00
Sub-Total Parlung 59.00 21,498.00 364
Totals Area
Other Areas Net 3,760.00
Spa Net 16,255.50
Conference Net 5,849.00
Service Net 7,971.00
Parking and Ramp Net 21,498.00
Total Net 55,333.50
NeUGross Differeuce 2,362.50 96%
Page 9
f
I
~
I Vail Plaza Hotel Level -2 Zehren and Associates, Inc.
f 961070.00 12/13/99
i
~ Level Minus Two
~ Gross Square Footage 53,524.00
i
~
Other Areas
Mechanical 0.00
Corridor (public) 225.00
Core (elevator) 150.00
Core stair 285.00
Sub-Totai Other Areas 660.00
Area
Valet Spaces 125.00
Parking Spaces (Full Size) 65.00
Parking Spaces (Co act 2.00
Sub-Total Parldng 192.00 51,462.00 268.03
Totals Area
Other Net 660.00
Parking and Ramp Net 51,462.00
Total Net 52,122.00
NebGross Dillerence 1,402.00 97%
Page 10
Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/ 13/99
Dwellin¢ Units Total Area Park. Factor Park. Redd
Dwelling Unit 1 5,499.00 >2000 2.50
Club Units Total Area Factor S aces
Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 7(F7at) 1,204.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 8(F7at) 948.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 11 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 14 (Flat) 920.00 500Q000 2.00
Club Unit 15 (F7at) 1,405.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 16 (F1at) 1,222.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 17 (Flat) 865.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 500Q000 2.00
Ciub Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 1,351.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit21 (Two Level) 1,878.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 22 (Two L.evel) 1,785.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit23 (Flat) 1,9821.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit24 (Flat) 1,108.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 25 (F7at) 975.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 27 (Two Level) 1,769.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 28 (Two Level) 1,7691.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 2,282,.00 >2000 2.50
Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226,.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 34 (Two Level) 1,327.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00
Club LJnit 37 (Two Level) 1,848.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 1,794.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 1,727.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 43 (Two Level) 1,793A0 500Q000 2.00
Club Unit 44 (Two Level) 1,300.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 45 (Two Level) 1,161.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 46 (Flat) 856.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 47 (Two Level) 814.00 500<2000 2.00
Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 500<2000 2.00
Total Club Paridng 64,094.00 96.50
Page 11
Vail Plaza Hotel Parking Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
Accommodation Units Area Kevs Saaces Factor
Total Acc. Units 36,013.00 99.00 75.61 0.76
Restaurant Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Saaces
Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44 1:8 seats 23.56
Loun e Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Saaces
Total L.ounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12 1:8 seats 6.14
Retail Area Factor SpeCes
Total Retail 4,047.00 1300 sq. ft. 13.49
Conference Area Seat Fact. Seats Factor Saaces
Main Ballroom 7,004.00 15.00 466.93 1:16 seats** 29.18
Breakout 3,364.00 15.00 224.27 1:16 seats*" 14.02
Total Required Saaces
Total Dwelling Unrt 2.50
Total Club 96.50
Total Accommodation 75.61
Total Restaurant 23.56
Total Lounge 6.14
Total Retail 13.49
Conference 43.20
SDD Parking Required (phases 1.2.3.5) * 149.68
Sub-Total Parlung 410.67
Mixed Use Reduction 10% 41.07
Total Parldng Required 369.61
Total Parldng Provided 366.00
Parlung Difterence -3.61
ParkiuQ Provided Full Size Compact Valet Total
Facisting SDD spaces to remain* 112 0 0 112
Level Zero Parking 0 0 5 5
Level Minus One Parking 41 11 7 59
Level Minus Two ParkinQ 65 0 125 190
Total Parlring Provided 218 11 137 366
Percentage 60% 3% 37% 100%
* SDD Parldna Reauired (nhases1.2.3.5)
Existing SDD Spaces 112
SDD Parking Deficit 75
Sub-Total (Current Requirement) 187
Previouly Applied Reduction- (2.5%) 191.68
Currently Dedicated Phase 4 Spaces -42
Total SDD Parldng Required (phases 1,2,3,5) 149.68
**assume 50% internaUpublic transportation/pedestrian traffic - breakout use by bailroom occupants
Page 12
Vail Plaza Hote1 Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
~ Dwelline Units Upper Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows
Dwelling Unit 1 2,053.00 3,446.00 5,499.00 340.00 4.00 4.00 10.00
Club Units Upper Area Lower Area Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows
Club Unit 1(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 112.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 2(Flat) 1,251.00 0.00 1,251.00 112.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 3(Flat) 1,237.00 0.00 1,237.00 95.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 4(Flat) 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 93.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 5(Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 6(Flat) 1,193.00 0.00 1,193.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 7(Flat) 1,204.00 0.00 1,204.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 8(Flat) 948.00 0.00 948.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 9(Flat) 976.00 0.00 976.00 60.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 10 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 11 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 12 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 94.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 13 (Flat) 970.00 0.00 970.00 146.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 14 (F'lat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 199.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 15 (Flat) 1,405.00 0.00 1,405.00 40.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
Club Unit 16 (Flat) 1,222.00 0.00 1,222.00 40.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 17 (F7at) 865.00 0.00 865.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 18 (Flat) 1,114.00 0.00 1,114.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 19 (Flat) 1,209.00 0.00 1,209.00 164.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 20 (Two Level) 790.00 561.00 1,351.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 21 (Two Level) 790.00 1,088.00 1,878.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 22 (Two Level) 790.00 995.00 1,785.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 23 (Flat) 991.00 0.00 1,983.00 93.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 24 (Flat) 1,108.00 0.00 1,108.00 260.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 25 (Flat) 975.00 0.00 975.00 95.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 26 (Flat) 958.00 0.00 958.00 93.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 27 (Two L.evel) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 28 (Two I.evel) 790.00 979.00 1,769.00 241.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 29 (Two Level) 1,313.00 969.00 2,282.00 147.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 8.00
Club Unit 30 (Flat) 920.00 0.00 920.00 64.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 31 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 32 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 33 (Flat) 1,096.00 0.00 1,096.00 147.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 34 (Two Level) 814.00 513.00 1,327.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 35 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3:00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 36 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 37 (Two Level) 814.00 1,034.00 1,848.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 38 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 39 (Two Level) 814.00 980.00 1,794.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 40 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 41 (Flat) 1,226.00 0.00 1,226.00 93.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 42 (Two Level) 814.00 913.00 1,727.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 43 (Two Level) 814.00 979.00 1,793.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 44 (Two I.evel) 814.00 486.00 1,300.00 147.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 4.00
Club Unit 45 (Two I.evel) 648.00 513.00 1,161.00 108.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Club Unit 46 (F7at) 856.00 0.00 856.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
Club Unit 47 (Two L.evel) 814.00 992.00 1,806.00 147.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 6.00
Club Unit 48 (Two Levell 814.00 992.00 1.806.00 147.00 3.00 100 0.00 6.00
48 Total Club Units 48,061.00 15,041.00 64,094.00 5,953.00 110.00 87.00 22.00 218.00
Page 13
Vail Plaza Hotel Program Summary Zehren and Associates, Inc.
961070.00 12/13/99
~
AcCOmmodation llnits Room Area Rooms Total Area Deck Area Kevs Bedrooms Studios Pillows
Total Acc. Uoits 363.77 99.00 36,013.00 0.00 99.00 99.00 0.00 198.00
Residential Totals 105,606.00 0.00 213.00 190.00 22.00 426.00
Restaurant Seatine Area Occ. Factor Seats
Main Restaurant 2,155.00 18.00 119.72
SoecialtvRestaurant 1,718.00 25.00 68.72
Total Restaurant 3,873.00 20.55 188.44
Lounee
Lounge 1,228.00 25.00 49.12
Lobby Baz 674 25 26.96
Conference Facilites Seatine Area Occ. Factor Seats
Main Ballroom 7,004 15 467
Breakout 3,364 15 224 ,
Pre-Convene 4 970 7 355
Total Convention 15,338
Spa
Level Zero 8,544.00
Level Minus One 16 55.50
Total 24,799.50
Retail
Retail One 1702
Retail Two 1740
Retail Three 605.00
Retail Four 0.00
Total Retail 4,047.00
Adminstration 3,772.00
Page 14