HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-06-27 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
i
I
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, June 27, 2000
1:00 P.M. AT TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
NOTE: Time of items is approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied
upon to'determine at what time Council will consider an item.
EXECUTIVE SESSION,
1. Discussion of Timber Ridge and litigation. (30 mins.)
Tom Moorhead
REGULAR MEETING
1. Council Contribution Criteria Discussion. (1 hr.)
Steve Thompson
Pam Brandmeyer ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Chris Stouder Review current criteria and affirm or change the criteria.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
The prior emphasis had been to fund functions or programs
that supported a positive economic climate in Vail and /or an
environmentally sensitive high quality of life. The emphasis
had moved away from giving money to groups that provide
health and human services as this service is traditionally
provided by the county. The Town Council provided seed
funding to the United Way to fund health and human service
organizations in 1999. Staff has enclosed the contribution
schedule for 2000 to give you an idea of where the funding
has been allocated for the past calendar year. Additionally,
Council's current critical strategies are: transportation;
environmental strategies; infrastructure; economic viability;
local housing; and community collaboration/responsible
leadership. This item has come back to you based on a
request from some current Councilmembers.
2. Carnie DRB Appeal. (50 mins.)
Brent Wilson An appeal of the Design Review Board's approval of a
proposed single-family residence at the proposed Lot 4,
Potato Patch Creek, located to the east of the Potato Patch
Club and north of Sun Vail on an unplatted parcel of land.
Applicant: John and Joan Carnie, represented by Michael
Lauterbach
Appellants: Dome Investment Group and George and
Elizabeth Ireland, represented by Arthur A.
Abplanalp, Jr.
ACTION REQUESTED OF VAIL TOWN COUNCIL:
Uphold/Overturn/Modify the Design Review Board's
approval of the plans for Lot 4, Potato Patch Creek.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Please refer to the attached
memorandum.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the
Town Council uphold the Design Review Board's approval
with conditions of the proposed plan for Lot 4, Potato Patch
Creek subject to the following findings:
1. That the standards and conditions imposed by the
requirements of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations) have
been met.
2. That the conditions imposed on the approval are
adequate to protect the interest of the Appellants and
the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association.
3. Creekside Apartments. (15 mins.)
Bob McLaurin On May 31, 2000 the Town of Vail purchased 12 apartments
known as Creekside Apartments. The units are currently
leased to local' employees through September and October
2000. Staff would like to maintain all 12 of the units as
rentals for Town of Vail employees.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Provide staff with direction on how Council would like the 12
apartments to be occupied.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
When the 12 units at Creekside were purchased there was
discussion of selling a portion of the units to either local
employees or local businesses to rent to their employees.
After further evaluation it may be more prudent to offer a
number of the units to local businesses or employees for
lease rather than sale. Town staff has a desire to maintain
as many units as possible for rentals to Town employees.
The demand for housing, particularly one-bedrooms, is very
high and has proven to be invaluable in hiring employees.
The availability of Town supplied housing has proven to be
critical in hiring workers from Australia.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends maintaining all 12 units for Town of Vail
employees
4. Voluntary Smoking Compliance. (15 mins.)
Patrick Hamel Review of smoking in food service establishments in the
Town of Vail.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Does the Council
wish to continue looking into the possible regulation of
smoking in food service establishments?
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: A member of the Town
Council received a complaint regarding smoking in food
service establishments. Since the topic had not been looked
into for several years staff was directed to conduct a survey.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since staff has not received
complaints regarding smoking in restaurants, it appears that
restaurants have effectively dealt with smoking in a
constructive way to limit conflict between smokers and non-
smokers. Staff recommendation is to take no action at this
time.
5. Community Facilities Hub Site Update. (1 hr.)
Russell Forrest
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Review and consider the questions of 1) election strategy;
2) when should architectural sketch plans be developed; 3)
input from the June 14th public meeting
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
The purpose for this work session is to simply frame several
questions in preparation for additional public hearings in.
July. In addition staff is asking if additional. information is
needed before Council is comfortable making a decision on
a site plan.
6. DRB/PEC Report. (10 mins.)
Allison Ochs
Brent Wilson
7. Information Update. (10 mins.)
8. Council Reports. (10 mins.)
9. Other. (10 mins.)
10. Adjournment. (5:30 P.M.)
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION AND THE
REGULAR EVENING MEETING FOR TUESDAY JULY 4T" HAVE BEEN
CANCELLED.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7111100, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7/18/00, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7/11/00, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification.
Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
TOWNiOF V7ARFWRUNp,CNG1REQUE ~ 1 1999 1999 1999 2000 Cash 2000 1n-Kind 2000 2000
GENERAL FUND: Description Request Contribution Request Request Description Final
ECONOMIC:
1 Bravo! Colorado/John Giovando 30,000 28,500 30,000 25,000
2 CARTS/Jim Scherer 4,000 2,500
3 The Chamber of Comrmerce/Jen Brown 20,000 6,000 6,000 I 4,000
3 The Chamber of Commerce/Jen Brown 12/3/99 Dobson use 1 Day (ril, Dobson 1 1 day ice
4 LH Merchants-Jamin Jazz Nights/Gary Boris 20,000 1 15,000
5 VV Merchants-Block Parties/Kaye Ferry 20,000 1 15,000
6 LH/V V Merchants Assoc-The Guide/Kaye Ferry 15,000 1 10,000
7 Vail Jazz Foundation/Howard Stone 10,000 7,500 .15,000 1 7,000
8 Vail Valley Foundation/Rick Beveridge: I
8 American Ski Classic 30,000 25,000 30,000 I 17,000
8 World Mountain Bike Championships (for 2001) 50,000 50,000
8 American Cycle Classic 20,000 0
8 Winter Concert Series 10,000 0
8 Parking 450 Debits 2,250 2,250 2,300 460 debits 2,300 debits
8 Vail International Dance Festival 12,500 12,500 12,500 11,500
8 Gerald R. Ford Ampitheater (Hot Summer Nights) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Chevy International Ski Festival 10,000 0 I
Subtotal - VVF 59,750 44,750 129,800 8,000 Pub. Wks & Police 85,800
TOTAL ECONOMIC 1197301' 8d,-<<369,61r,I i,q
EDUCATIONAL:
9 Colorado Avalanche Info Center/Knox Williams 1,000 500
10 Gore Range Natural Science School/Kim Langmaid 10,000 0
11 Learning Tree/Moe Mulrooney 650 0
12 Meet the Wildemess/fhomas McCalden 5,000 0 5,000 0
13 The Vail Symposium/Ebby Pinsen 2,000 0
14 The Youth Foundation/Sandra Nadeau 0 0 5,000 0
15 Environmental Educator 0 0
16 Tom It Up Vail Party/Kaye Ferry 7,200 (1)
17 Turn It Up Vail Training/Kaye Ferry 7,000 (2)
TOTAL EDUCATIONAL 5:000 a 3-050h''
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES:
18 The Jimmie Heuga Center/Bruce Valentine 1,500 500 1,500 0
19 United Way of Eagle River Valley/Kathy Henry 10,000 5,000 10,000 1,000
20 Vail Mountain Rescue Group/Tim Reinholtz 2,000 2.000 2.000 2,000 I
TOTAL HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES <d;1 i 500 4 5.so0 3;00i{'•a~
RECREATION: I 1
21 Ski Club Vail/Kate Asoian 4 Days Ice 0 0 4 Days (rD Dobson 4 days
22 Vail Intemat'l Hockey Club/Peter Zent 0 0 I 5,000 1,000
23 Vail Jr Hockey Association/Peter Zen[ 0 0 12 Days (`rJ, Dobson (31
TOTAL RECREATION s.uou U 0
PRIOR YEAR REQUESTS t-) 175 o
SUB TOTAL - ( o,1 RIHVT1Q*,s i s 1 i. ~o r,u
YBudgerErpr z000
ARRANGEMENTS and AGREEMENTS:
Channel s(40%ofourfranchise feereceived) 140% fee 44,880 44,880 44,880 I 44,880
Vail Valley Foundation 112,000 112,000 0
Vail Valley Exchange 6,300 6,300 6,300 I 6,300
Berry Creek 5th- operating expenses 20,000 20,000 20,000 I (4)
Vail Valley Athlete Commission 5,000 5,000 5,000 1 5,000
24 Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau:
24 Events & Information Staff 3,675 7 Blue Passes I 3,675 Blue Passes
24 Marketing 183,500 183,500 183,500 I 0
24 Information Booths 140,000 110,000 155,800 I 155,800
24 Special Events I 170,000 255,000 332,000 1 332,000
24 Vail 100 I 10,625 25 Parking Permits 10,625 25 Blue Passes
25 Lodging Quality Initiative ( 105,984 I 75,000 cnc'I app'd 10/19/99
Total VVTCB 493,500 736,680 867,764 I 577,100
' b0
3G,tiRU„
CJri ~ TOTAL- AILILAtiCPMCN7S and Af,RLt?71:N I S USI iSU S1. 155 653 ?
,Itud Ct for 2000
R VN. ID rb 1 11 8,19,910 850.5115 [.162,905 802,080`
120 Parking Passes 1 0
1
26 Vail Alpine Garden Foundation/Ry Southard (30 Debits 150
26 Vail Alpine Garden Foundation/Ry Southard Pd fin RETT 20,000 10,000 38,500 0 1 38,500
(1) Council wants to consider all Turn It Up expenses for 2000 in 2000. Would probably be paid from Council Contigency
(2) Council approved to pay this from '99 Council Contingency
(3) Council approved all 12 days. 9 days for the 1 st 3 weekends in November 2000 and 3 days in April of 2000
(4) If needed, will plan on a supplemental appropriation in 2000 when known
DRAFT
June 21, 2000
RE: Contributions
Dear :
The Town Council has reviewed and approved the contribution request procedure for 2001
contributions. Please note that contributions will only be awarded to applicants who can
show the contribution will be used to support a positive sustained economic climate in Vail
and/or an environmentally sensitive high quality of life in Vail.
Attached please find the following forms that relate format and policy the Town of Vail has
implemented in regard to requests for funding. These forms are as follows:
1) Contribution Policy/ Disclosure
2) Application for Town of Vail Funding
3) Application for Town of Vail Funding/Balance Sheet
4) Application for Town of Vail Funding/ Statement of Sources and Uses
5) List of 1999 Requests and Approvals
A completed submission must be received at the Town of Vail by Thursday, August 31, 2000,
in order to qualify for funding in 2001. Funding will be determined solely from the written
application; no in-person presentations will be held. If the Town Council has questions
about your application, you may be contacted by a staff member at a later date. Requests for
parking passes and/or parking days must be included in the disclosure. Individual requests
throughout the year, outside this process, will not be considered.
When making your request, please keep in mind, the Town is experiencing uncertainty in its
revenue levels and, therefore, is not planning to increase its contribution budget.
If you have any questions on materials to be submitted, please do not hesitate to contact
either Reatha Schmidt, Cashier, at 479-2100, Christine B. Anderson, CPA at 479-2119.
Sincerely,
TOWN OF VAIL
Reatha Schmidt
Cashier
DRAFT
CONTRIBUTION POLICY
TOWN OF VAIL
1. All contribution requests received by the Town of Vail will be processed in the
following manner:
A. All requests must be submittted in writing using the Town's application for
funding. You may submit financial information (Balance Sheet and Statement
of Sources and Uses) ONLY IF it does NOT exceed 2 pages in length. Please do
not attach additional it2formation. Incomplete applications and supplemental
information will not be accepted. The Town Council will only be given your
completed application forms. No supplemental information will be given to
the Town Council.
B. All applications for funding in 2001 shall be sent to the Town by Thursday,
August 31, 2000.
C. The Town Council will evaluate the various proposals based on their support
of the following outcomes:
1. A positive, sustained economic climate
2. An environmentally sensitive high quality of life
2. Disclosures to all applicants:
A. No money will be disbursed until March 1, 2001. Each recipient must invoice
the Town of Vail for the total approved contribution prior to March 1, 2001.
B. Because of uncertainty of revenue estimates, please note the following
possibilities:
1) Contribution funding may be reduced based on 2000 revenues.
2) The Town of Vail may choose to disburse funding in quarterly installments
throughout 2001.
C. Notification of awards will be sent after the Council approves the final budget
. which is currently planned for October 5, 2000
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING mmar DRAr a
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
All applications must be submitted to the Town of Vail by August 31, 2000. You must provide
11 copies of the application. Any application received after that date or any application packet
with fewer than 11 copies will not be considered.
Please send application to:
Town of Vail
Christine B. Anderson, C.P.A., Finance and Budget Manager
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
For questions on the financial statements, please contact Christine Anderson at 479-2119.
PLEASE TYPE THIS APPLICATION OR PRINT IN BLACK INK
1. Name of organization:
2. Contact person:
3. Mailing address:
4. Telephone:
5. Members and Titles of your governing board:
6. Amount of contribution requested:
7. Organization fiscal year-end:
8. Are your books audited?
9. How will the contribution be used?
10. How does your request support the Town outcomes identified in item 1C of the
contribution policy?
11. Who currently funds your organization (other governments, private donations,
user fees, etc.)?
12. Organization's mission statement:
(If more room is needed to answer questions, please use the back of this page.)
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING DRAFT
Balance Sheet
Instructions: Round all figures to the nearest dollar. Please present in as much detail as
possible.
Most Recent Completed
Fiscal Year (Date: )
Assets: $
Total Assets $
Liabilities: $
Total Liabilities $
Net Worth (Total Assets Minus Total
Liabilites) $
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING MMMM DRA191
Statement of Sources and Uses
Instructions: Round all figures to the nearest dollar. Please present as much detail as possible.
Current Fiscal Year Budget
Revenues:
(List by funding source)
Total Revenue $
Expenses: $
Total Expenses $
Total Revenue Minus Expenses $
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: June 27, 2000
SUBJECT: An appeal of the Design Review Board's approval of a proposed single-family
residence, located to the east of the Potato Patch Club and north of the Sun Vail
condominiums on an unplatted parcel in the vicinity of the Vail Potato Patch
subdivision.
Appellants: Dome Investment Group and George and Elizabeth Ireland,
represented by Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr.
Planner: Brent Wilson
1. SUBJECT PROPERTY
The "Carnie Property," an unplatted parcel located east of the Potato Patch Club and
north of Sun Vail (see attached map). The proposed development is titled "Potato Patch
Creek." The single-family residence would be located on the proposed Lot 4.
II. STANDING OF APPELLANT
The Appellants are individual owners of Unit 11 (Dome Investment Group) and Unit 15
(Ireland) in the Potato Patch Club. The Potato Patch Club is located adjacent to the
proposed development (just to the west). This appeal was filed by individual unit owners
and is not on behalf of the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association.
III. BACKGROUND
List of attachments:
- Exhibit #1- Appellant's appeal form
Exhibit #2 - Reductions of approved plans
Exhibit #3 - Potato Patch Club Resolution
The Development Proposal
Historv
The following is a summary of the background on this proposal and appeal. The
applicant, Jack Carnie, represented by Michael Lauterbach (Mr. Lauterbach has the
property under contract to purchase), received Design Review Board (DRB) approval
(10/20/99) for a site development plan including 5 single family homes on a 59,500 sq. ft.
parcel of land (Potato Patch Creek) zoned Residential Cluster. Residential Cluster
zoning allows the development of single-family, two-family and multiple-family dwelling
units. The allowable number of dwelling units on the property is 7.5 dwelling units based
on a density of 6 dwelling units per buildable acre.
1
The project is accessed through the Potato Patch Club along an existing driveway. It
was identified that this driveway, due to the increase in use by the Potato Patch Creek
proposal, would have to be upgraded to allow access to the proposed project. The
applicant's submittal included a resolution from the Board of Directors of the Potato
Patch Condominium Association (see exhibit) indicating their intent to approve this
access and related improvements.
On October 20, 1999 the Design Review Board approved the development proposal with
the following four conditions:
1. Prior to the recording of any plat or construction on the Carnie property, the
owner/applicant shall secure legal access through the Potato Patch Club property
via an access easement or similar instrument.
2. Prior to the recording of any plat or construction on the Carnie property, the
owner/applicant, shall obtain written approval from the Potato Patch Club
Homeowner's Association for completing driveway/access improvements (i.e.,
paving and grading) on the Potato Patch Club property.
3. Final civil engineering plans must be approved by the Town Engineer for the
access road prior to application for a building permit.
4. The approval is specific to the Carnie property and does not extend to property
outside the subject parcel.
On November 10, 1999, the Community Development Department received a Design
Review Application from the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association, Inc. to
construct the access improvements discussed above. The DRB granted an approval for
the required access improvements on December 15, 1999.
The Current Application Under Appeal
On May 3f,, 2000, Mr. Lauterbach appeared before the DRB for conceptual review of a
proposed single-family residence on the subject property. After revising the plans per the
DRB's request, he returned for a final DRB review on May 17, 2000. The DRB granted
an approval of the request, subject to the following conditions:
1. On the west elevation, the band should be carried around the bay window (with
the window roof raised to accommodate the band) and additional braces should
be added under the cantilever.
2. This approval is for the architecture of the proposed Lot 4 single-family residence
only. The proposed feeder road is still under review and Town Engineer approval
is required prior to building permit issuance.
3. This approval will not be valid until the applicant provides proof of legal access to
the subject property.
4. Required road improvements must be constructed in full prior to the issuance of
any TCO's on the Potato Patch Creek project.
2
IV. NATURE OF THE APPEAL
The specific language of the appeal is attached and should be relied upon as the
statement of the appeal. The following is a summary of issues and responses prepared
by Town staff:
1. The appellant asserts that access to the property remains speculative.
The applicant submitted a copy of the Potato Patch Club Association's resolution
indicating their intent to approve access to the property and related
improvements. The DRB's approval of the proposal included a specific condition
that the "approval will not be valid until the applicant provides proof of legal
access to the subject property." Without securing legal access, the applicant's
approval becomes null and void. Therefore, the issue of whether the applicant
has the right to access the property appears to be adequately protected.
2. The proposed agreement with the Potato Patch Club Condominium
Association requires a 30' setback between structures and the property
line. Although the proposed building footprint maintains a minimum 30'
setback (zoning requires 15' setback), the DRB approval allows eave
overhangs to encroach into this area.
The proposed eaves do not encroach into any required zoning setbacks, but
rather into the private 30' setback referenced in the access agreement between
the Potato Patch Club Association and the applicant. The Town of Vail reviews
applications for compliance with the town code and does not enforce private
covenants or restrictions. This proposal meets all aspects of the town's zoning
regulations. Any private issues between the applicant and appellant should be
resolved through a private venue.
3. The appellant has concerns with the proposed building height, with
particular regard to chimney heights.
The Residential Cluster Zone District allows a maximum building height of 33'. At
its highest point, the proposed residence measures 32.4'. Pursuant to Section
12-14-9, Vail Town Code, chimneys may extend above the height limit a distance
of not more than 25% of the height limit nor more than 15'. This provision would
allow a chimney height of 8.25 feet above the height limit. The proposed chimney
is approximately 35.5 feet above grade or 2.5 feet (7.5%) above the height limit.
4. The appellant asserts the required 15' setback between "sites" (per the
Residential Cluster zoning) has not been met by this proposal. Under the
appellant's interpretation of the zoning regulations, this required setback
also applies to the distance between buildings or single-family "sites".
The required zoning setbacks apply to exterior lot lines only. Section 13-9-1(B),
Vail Town Code (Single-Family Subdivisions) states that for zoning purposes, the
multiple home sites created through the single-family subdivision process are to
be treated as one contiguous lot. Therefore, development standards are applied
to the Potato Patch Creek lot, not the individual home sites. Distances between
3
i
buildings are regulated by the Uniform Building Code, not the zoning regulations.
The Uniform Building Code requires a 10-foot separation between buildings. This
project allows for a 12-foot separation.
5. The appellant asserts the Design Review Board erred by not requiring a
manufacturer's color number and small sample color chip-as part of this
application.
The DRB application for this proposal includes an itemized description of the
colors and materials to be used. Additionally, the elevation drawings submitted
reference the locations of proposed building materials.
The colors and materials proposed are identical to those used at 756 Potato
Patch Drive (another Lauterbach project). The DRB examined these materials
and colors as part of their site visits prior to final approval of this proposal. The
DRB had sufficient information available to assess the proposed colors and
materials for the project.
6. The appellant asserts the application was deficient, as it did not include "a
site plan of the entire project, indicating the location and timing of each
phase of the project, areas to be utilized as construction staging areas for
each phase, and the limits of construction activity for each phase."
As part of their review of this proposal, the DRB examined the overall site
development plan for the entire project. Additionally, the approved landscape and
site development plan for Lot 4 (Sheet SD1) shows a "limits of disturbance" fence
around the property. As with all other construction projects in the Town of Vail,
construction staging areas for each phase will be identified as part of the building
permit review process.
V. REQUIRED ACTION
Uphold/Overturn/Modify the Design Review Board's approval with conditions of the
proposed development plan for Potato Patch Creek.
The Town Council is required to make findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town
Code:
The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the
particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that
the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (Zoning
Regulations, Title 12) have or have not been met.
4
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Town Council uphold the Design Review Board's approval
with conditions of the proposed single-family residence, subject to the following findings:
1. That the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12
(Zoning Regulations) have been met.
2. That the conditions imposed on the approval are adequate to protect the interest
of the Appellants and the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association.
5
1
~i
'0WN OF PAIL
APPEALS FORM,
REQUIRED FOR FILING AIN APPEAL OF A STAFF, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OR
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CON MISSION ACTION
A. ACTION/DECISION BEING APPEALED: Design Review Approval of a project known
as Unit-/Lot:-.#4 Potato Patch Creek, by the Town of Vail Design Review
Board on the 17th day of May, 2000.
B. DATE OF ACTION/DECISION: 17 May 2000
C. NAME OF BOARD OR PERSON RENDERING THE DECISION/TAKING ACTION:
Town of Vail Design Review Board
D. NAME OF APPELLANT(S):Dome Investment Group George & Elisabeth Ireland
c/o Paul Hoff Suite 3650
3800 East Long Road 1700 Lincoln Street
Littleton, CO 80121-1914 Denver, CO 80203
MAILING ADDRESS: .
Unit 11 Unit 16
Potato Patch Club Condos Potato Patch Club Condos
PHYSICAL ADDRESSINVAIL: 950 Red Sandstone Rd., Vail_0664/Red Sandstone. Rd":.
(.SU3) 000-JouU k.DU 0-2171 Vail
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF APPELLANT'S PROPERTY IN VAIL: Unit 16, Potato Patch Club
U7it 11, Potato Patch Condominiums
C' nh (nn,,nmi n i iimS
E. SIGNATURES :
Page I of 2 DUM'i, ABPLANALP & MAURIELLO, P.C.
WestStar Bank Bldg. Ste.300
RED MAY 2 6 2000 108 S. Frontage Rd.W.
Vail: CO 81657
F. Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of land? ve s If yes, please provide the following information:
are you an adjacent property owner? Yes X no
If no, give a detailed explanation of how you are an "aggrieved or adversely affected person." "Aggrieved or
adversely affected person" means any person who will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or
furthered by this title. The alleged adverse interest may be shared in common with other members of the
community at large, but shall exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons.
Appellants are the owners of specific condominiums and the owners of undivided
interests in the general common elements of the Potato Patch Club, which adjoins
the property which was the subject of the action from which this appeal is being
taken. The approval of the project, and its possible development, constitute a
public safety hazard endangering the property of the Appellants and would
permit the development of the subject propEety without adequate review and
consideration of the impacts on the property of the Appellants and the Potato
Patch Club in general. The approval would also permit the development based
upon access through the Potato Patch Club for which no standards have been
established and regarding which there has been neither consent by the appellants
to the other owners of Potato Patch Club nor any analysis or review of the impact
of changes to the Potato Patch Club in association with that access. Further,
the plans upon which the Design Review Board relied, in association with
conditioning approval upon access through the Potato Patch Club are inaccurate,
incomplete and unable to accurately understand the impact of the proposed
project or the condition imposed upon the property of the Appellants and the
Potato Patch Club as a whole. Further, the proposed projects impact the
properties of the Appellants, in a manner which violates certain height and
setback requirements which were the subject of agreement between the
applicant and the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association. Finally, the
application-and material do not satisfy the requirements of the Vail Municipal
Code.
G. Provide the names and addresses (both person's mailing address and property's physical address in Vail) of all
owners of property which are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including properties
separated by a right-of-way, stream, or other intervening barriers). Also provide addressed and stamped envelopes for
each property owner on the list.
H. On separate sheets of paper, specify the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code sections having
relevance to the action being appealed.
I. FEE: 50.00
Page 2 of 2
LAW OFFICES
DUNN, ABPLANALP & MAURIELLO, P.C.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
JOHN W. DUNN WESTSTAR BANK BUILDING TELEPHONE:
ARTHUR A. ASPLANALP, JR. 108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST (970) 476-0300
DIANE H. MAURIELLO FACSIMILE:
INGA HAAGENSON CAUSEY SUITE 300
VAIL, COLORADO 81657 (970)476-4765
OF COUNSEL: highcountrylaw.com
JERRY W. HANNAH 26 May 2000 e-mail: vaillaw@vail.net
CERTIFIED LEGAL ASSISTANTS
KAREN M. DUNN, CLAS
Russell Forrest, Director, JANICE K. SCOFIELD, CLA
Department of Community Development
and Town Council of the Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail CO
HAND DELIVERED
Re: Lauterbach/Carne Application - Potato Patch Creek Unit #4
Members of the Council:
This Firm represents Dome Investment Group and Mr. and Mrs. George Ireland,
the owners of Condominium Units 11 and 16, respectively, and an undivided interest
in the general common elements of the Potato Patch Club, which property adjoins the
property which is the subject of the above application. Our clients object to the
approval of this proposal because of the fact that it violates the design review
guidelines and the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. This letter represents the
elaboration of the basis for the appeal which has been filed.
Some background is in order. The parcel of land which is the subject of this
application is currently owned by Mr. and Mrs. John Carnie, who have signed the
application before this Board. The Town correctly identified the absence of access to
this parcel as a problem as early as the conceptual review of the project as a whole.
The Town required that the applicants provide evidence of access, as a result of which
the applicant's representative, Mr. Lauterbach, engaged in negotiations with the Potato
Patch Club Condominium Association for access across the general common elements
of the Potato Patch Club. The Town, in considering the entirety of this project for
conceptual review, relied upon a resolution of the Association indicating a willingness
to enter into negotiations to grant an easement. There is some question as to whether
an actual agreement has actually been established by Mr. Lauterbach or Mr. and Mrs.
Carnie and the Association. In any event, the Association does not own the general
common elements, and the question of whether the Association may grant an
easement across land which it does not own is now under litigation. The general
common elements are under a lis pendens awaiting resolution of that issue. Clear title
to the easement cannot be granted, and any action purporting to grant such an
easement may be judicially voided, prior to or at the time that litigation is resolved.
1
Ordinarily, the Town of Vail does not become involved in contractual disputes
or covenant issues among private parties. In this situation, however, the agreement
which has been approved by the Association and which purports to be have as its goal
the grant of an easement at some time in the future (the validity of which is under
litigation) was appropriately imposed as a requirement of the Town of Vail. Therefore,
while the Town of Vail ordinarily may not become involved in disputes between
private parties such as that involving access to this parcel, it must be pointed out that
the Town of Vail is directly involved in this particular agreement, because it required
the agreement, and both the validity of that agreement and the proposed future grant
of an easement are uncertain until judicial review is completed and there is a
determination regarding whether or not the Association can grant the intended
easement over the objection of the owners of the land the easement is to cross.
With the foregoing background, it must be observed that, even if the proposed
agreement between the Potato Patch Club Association and Mr. Lauterbach might be
valid, violations of that agreement with reference to design of the project before this
Board are central to the question of whether the Town should approve the design of
the project. If the agreement is violated, then the Town's condition of approval of the
project is also violated.
It is the duty of the Design Review Board to determine whether a project
adequately provides for light, air, and the protection of neighboring properties, and
to assure that a project is consistent with other design review criteria of the Town of
Vail. Specifically, the intent of the design review guidelines set forth at Section
12.11.1.D.5. of the Vail Municipal Code includes the following:
To protect neighboring property owners and users by malting sure that
reasonable provision has been made for such matters as pedestrian and
vehicular traffic, surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, the
preservation of light and air, and those aspects of design not adequately
covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring
land uses.
The reversal of the Design Review Board's approval of this project is requested
based upon the reasons set forth in the appeal form, including but not limited to the
following specifics:
1. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic is the first concern mentioned in the
statement of intent referred to above, yet access remains speculative.
2
Both the condemnation litigation by which Mr. and Mrs. Carnie have
attempted to obtain access across the Potato Patch Club and the
negotiations by which Mr. Lauterbach has attempted to obtain rights
from an Association which does not own the subject property remain in
litigation. The question of whether any right may be granted by the
Potato Patch Club Association (as distinguished from the owners of the
land across which the access road is to pass) remains subject to a lis
pendens. The route of access upon which the developer relies does not
exist at this time. This failure constitutes a violation of Section 12-11-
1.D.5., 12-11-4-2.b, and 12-11-5.G. of the Municipal Code.
2. The proposed agreement with the Potato Patch Club Condominium
Association upon which access supposedly relies would require that the
structures on the Potato Patch Creek project be set back thirty feet from
the Potato Patch Club property line. Viewing this proposed agreement
from the perspective of the developer and the Association (and the
owners supposedly protected, the_ proposed agreement defines the
impact which is or is not acceptable to the Potato Patch Club. The
proposed agreement does not adopt provisions of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code which would permit encroachments into the setback by
bay windows, decks, roof overhangs, or cantilevered sections of a
building. The plans and elevations of the proposed building approved by
the Design Review Board establish that parts of the proposed building
would violate the setback required by the proposed agreement with the
Association which has been required by the Town, while the proposal for
the project as a whole, considered and approved by the Town in 1999
and incorporated into the proposed agreement, showed this proposed
building #4 to be entirely behind the setback. The proposal should not
be approved because of this violation, which constitutes a violation of
Section 12-11-1.D.5 and 12-11-4.C.d. of the Municipal Code.
3. The proposed agreement with the Potato Patch Club Condominium
Association upon which access supposedly relies would require that the
buildings not exceed thirty-three feet from ground level. Although it
appears that the elevation of the roof may comply with this requirement,
that is unclear with reference to measurement from the lowest point
underlying the proposed building, and, because chimney elevations are
not identified, it is uncertain whether at the central chimney structure
violates that restriction. The purpose of the limitation was to be certain
that there remains uninterrupted light, air and view above thirty-three
3
feet over the original ground level of this project, and the existence of a
chimney impedes the view, if not air, at least as effectively as any other
part of a building. This violation of the agreement also constitutes a
violation of Section 12-11-1-D.5. of the Municipal Code.
4. The project is being developed as a site for single family residences. The
zone district in which the property is located is Residential Cluster, in
which single family residences are permitted. The zone district
regulation provides both direction and design review guidance regarding
the configuration of the structures within this zone district. The
applicant has configured the residences in such a way that there would
be approximately twelve feet between residences. The Residential
Cluster zone district indicates that there are to be fifteen-foot setbacks
between "sites." There seems to be uncertainty regarding whether this
project is to be organized as a subdivision or as a condominium of free-
standing single family residences. Whether structured as a subdivision
or as a condominium, each single family residence will be a "site" to
which no other "site" shall be closer than fifteen feet. Can the Town of
Vail accept a space of twelve feet between single family dwellings as a
reasonable provision for sound and sight buffers, and for the
preservation of light and air, where the side setback required is fifteen
feet? Whether read as a strict requirement or as guidance, the setback
reference indicates that the distance between uses should be at least
three feet greater than that proposed by the plan now before the Design
Review Board. This failure constituted aviolation of Section 12-11-1.D.5.
of the Municipal Code.
5. Although the Municipal Code requires the submittal of exterior surfacing
materials and samples of each, and that any approval specify such
material and color, this requirement was not satisfied. Although the
elevations identified some limited materials and a form requesting
proposed materials was completed, even that supposedly completed list
did not comply with the form's requirements, which required that the
applicant "specify the manufacturer's color, number and attach a small
color chip." The Design Review Board reviewed no such submittal. As
a result, the application and approval violated Section 12-11-4-C.l.g. of
the Municipal Code.
6. The subject proposal is part of a phased development. Under such
circumstances, the applicant was to submit a site plan of the entire
4
project, indicating the location and timing of each phase of the project,
areas to be utilized as construction staging areas for each phase, and the
limits of construction activity for each phase. No such information has
been submitted. Approval of the application under such conditions
violated Section I2-11-4.C.k. of the Municipal Code.
In summary, the application and proposal failed and fails to satisfy the intent
of the guidelines and specifications of the design review process, violates the
agreement into which the developer entered or intends to enter with the Potato Patch
Club Association, and violates the standards recognized by implication, if not
specifically, for the zone district in which the development is located. The proposal
should be disapproved.
The required list of property owners accompanies this letter. The addressed,
stamped envelopes for each of those owners are being delivered to Russell Forrest
with his original of this letter.
Very trul ours,
DU , ABP P & ELLO C.
Arthur A. Abplanal , Jr.
xc: Dome Investment Group
Mr. and Mrs. George Ireland
5
\ ) \
50
tl it ~1 bb-,.../
10
GNT
1 is k . - a - -f ~
- - Tit
NT
i I` y ~r ) )1 - Aga ~pG
04
f 58 1 + 115 )
RIDGE 82aal-lo
41
C W, IV
S -ale
~ i roc tR LEVEL , d 1 I ~i ~x
- \ 8256'-0' -0"--------- -5-_-._.i.%__ )N , / l
MET WALL be-P
~p `~`1`! ( ~e v•~, t,-a.~,'-.-~-- 82,x'°. ) ) ` i ,
- •j'
JOINT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS
OF THE POTATO PATCH CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
WHEREAS, the Potato Patch Club Condominium Association, Inc. (hereinafter
referred to as the "Association") is currently a party to certain litigation initiated by John A.
Carnie and Joan T. Carnie (the "Carnies") requesting the condemnation of a certain easement
over property owned by the Association in order to obtain access to a landlocked parcel of land
located adjacent to Association property and currently owned by the Carnies (the ''Carnie
Property")
WHEREAS, the Association has been advised that the Carnies may desire to sell
their property to MJL Development Inc- and/or Michael J. Lauterbach and/or their assigns or
affiliates,(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Potential Purchaser';).
'WHEREAS, initial discussions have taken place between authorized
representatives of the Association and the Potential Purchaser concerning the purchase of the
Carnie Property and the possible grant of an access easement over Association property by the
Association to Potential Purchaser.
WHEREAS. the Board of Directors of the Association have reached a general
understanding with Potential Purchaser regarding the process by which Potential Purchaser could
obtain an access easement from the Association at an agreed upon location if Potential Purchaser
actually obtains title to the Carnie Property.
WHEREAS, if Potential Purchaser obtains approval of the Town of Vail (and all
other (overnmental entities with jurisdiction over the subject property) for Potential Purchaser's
development plans and specifications (the "Plans and Specifications") with respect to the Carnie
Property, the prospects of a transfer of title to the Carnie Property to the Potential Purchaser are
greatly increased.
WHEREAS, in order to obtain approval of the Plans and Specifications for the
development of the Carnie Property, Potential Purchaser has advised the Association that
Potential Purchaser requires a letter of intent from the Association agreeing to grant to Potential
Purchaser as easement for ingress and egress over Association property to the Carnie Property at
the location specified in the Plans and Specifications.
WHEREAS; if Potential Purchaser is able to acquire the Carnie Property and
obtain from the Association the easement for ingress and egress more particularly described
herein; the litigation filed by the Carnies with respect thereto could be dismissed and the
Association could be released from the obligation to defend such action.
WHEREAS, on June 4, 1999 the Board of Directors of the Association adopted a
resolution (by a vote of six to two) recommending that the Board of Directors bring to the
owners and members of the Association at the annual meeting; a resolution authorizing the
Association to pursue the matters more particularly described herein.
41"4981 RGALT U3.."99'_.57 P\I
NOW THEREFORE-, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, in accordance with
Section 18.3.4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Condominiums:
1. The Board of Directors of the Association is hereby authorized to grant an
easement for ingress and egress to Potential Purchaser upon satisfaction of all of the terms and
conditions therefor set forth in this Resolution.
2. The ;grant of the subject easement for ingress and egress (the "Easement'')
shall be subject to the satisfaction of each and every one of the following conditions by Potential
Purchaser:
(a) Acquisition of the Carrie Property by Potential Purchaser;
(b) Final plat approval by the Town of Vail of the Plans and
Specifications for development of the Camie Property (the "Development');
(c) The Development shall contain no more than five (5) single family
residences and shall not exceed 3 X00 square feet GRFA, developed and built in
accordance with toe site plan attached hereto;
(d) A 30 foot setback from the Association's east property line shall be
established in the Plans and Specifications and maintained by Potential Purchaser;
(e) The Easement shall not be more than 25 feet in width, and the
turning radius of the Easement within the Association property must be approved by the
Town of Vail Fire Department and the Association Board of Directors;
(f) The written evidence of the Easement must provide that all costs of
surveying, complying with Town of -Vail planning requirements, all construction
(including road construction), landscaping and rounding of the entrance, as well as the
restoration of any Association property which is altered or damaged during construction,
shall be borne solely by Potential Purchaser;
(g) Potential Purchaser shall, upon execution of the formal
documentation of the Easement, pay to the Association the sum of $250,000, which shall
be allocated by the Association as condemnation award damages as specified in
Section 33.4 of the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club Condominiums'.
(h) The written documentation of the Easement shall contain, or
coincide with other documentation executed by the Association and Potential Purchaser,
a full settlement of the Carnie litigation with prejudice;
(1) The Easement shall not be granted until such time as Potential
Purchaser has obtained fee title to the Carnie Property;
Upon issuance of and in conjunction with the execution of a letter
of intent to grant the Easement to Potential Purchaser by the Association, the Carnies
must agree and stipulate to a reasonable continuance and vacation of the trial date and
417498 1 RCA 1.1 -1Sr2:99. ~7 PU 7
abatement of all legal proceedings in & current condemnation litigation, pending
completion of the Town of Vail planning process with respect to the Plans and
Specifications of Potential Purchaser for the Development.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Association is hereby
authorized to issue a non-binding letter of intent to the Potential Purchaser specifying the
parameters and limitations with respect to the Easement set forth above and any other limitations
and/or conditions required by the Board of Directors or counsel for the Association, for the
possible grant of the Easement to Potential Purchaser. Such letter of intent must contain an
acknowledgment by the Potential Purchaser that the issuance of the letter of intent and the
execution of the Easement shall in no way be construed to be an approval by the Association (or
any of its members) of the Development or the Plans and Specifications, and that all members of
the Association and the Association itself reserve all rights to participate in any Town of Vail
planning process relating to the development of the Carnie Property. Potential Purchaser must
further acknowledge that certain members of the Association may be opposed to the grant of the
Easemert and may actively participate in such Town of Vail planning process.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that within the limitations and parameters set forth
above, the Board of Directors of the Association shad be and is hereby authorized; empowered
and directed to negotiate, execute and, as necessary, record the above-described letter of intent
and the final definitive written Easement in conjunction with counsel for the Association; and to
negotiate a final settlement of the Carney litigation, with prejudice; as of the result of the grant of
the Easement.
FURTHER RESOLVED; that the Board of Directors is and shall be authorized,
empowered and directed to explore the possibility of creating a sub-association with respect to
the final approved development of the Carnie Property for the purposes of:
(a) sharing the cost of maintenance, repairs and snow removal for the
Easement;
(b) access to and appropriate cost sharing in the maintenance, repair
and capital improvements to the common elements of the Association, including the
tennis courts, pool, spa and health club; and
(c) to amend the Condominium Declaration for Potato Patch Club
Condominiums to include the above-described provisions, subjec'.t to the approval of the
owners and mortgagees of units within the Association as required by such Declaration,
with such other terms and conditions contained therein as may be required by the Board
of Directors and counsel for the Association as appropriate.
417498 ; RG,Lr 08%2.;99 2 57 PM J
The undersigned, as President of the Association, hereby certifies that the
Resolutions contained herein were duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors and the
members of the Association at the annual meeting of the Association conducted. on July 2, 1999
and the subsequent Board of Directors meeting held immediately thereafter.
Thomas J. Gargan, M.D., Psiden f the
Association
Approved and accepted this day of st. 999.
Michaei J. LauLrbach
41'498.1 RGALT 08/2!99 ^'S7 PNI 4
Memorandum
To: Town Council
From: Bob McLaurin
Date: June 27, 2000
Subject: Creekside Apartments
The Town of Vail acquired 12 rental units at Creekside Apartments on May 31,
2000. Currently, 11 of the 12 units are leased through September and October
(one is vacant). When the units were purchased there was discussion of selling
or leasing some of the units to local employees and/or businesses. After further
evaluation of the Town's employee housing needs there has been strong
direction from staff to maintain all 12 units as rentals for Town of Vail employees.
The availability of one-bedroom units has proven to be invaluable in hiring
employees. One-bedroom units are more desirable because they allow people
to live without roommates, which may be strangers. The ability to provide
housing for employees coming from Australia and New Zealand has made the
difference between filling the positions and not. The recruitment effort this
summer hopes to fill 25 seasonal jobs with Australians and New Zealanders. A
supply of housing makes all of the Town's recruiting efforts easier.
One concern that has been raised is that local (not Town of Vail) employees
currently occupy thq units. The Town would be replacing one group of local
employees with Town of Vail employees. All of the current residents are aware
the Town has purchased the units and may not be renewing some or all of the
leases. With ample time to find new housing this is less likely to be a problem for
the current tenants. Council may consider maintaining a large percentage of the
units for Town employees. The remaining units would be for lease to employees
of other local businesses. This option allows the Town to offer more or fewer
units to employees of other businesses next year after re-evaluating the Town's
employee housing needs.
The availability of Town provided housing has meant that the Town has been
able to fill more bus driver, booth attendant, snow shovelers, and other seasonal
positions reducing over-time expenses as well as employee burn-out. Staff
would recommend that Council consider maintaining all 12 units for Town of Vail
employee housing rentals.
To: Vail Town Council
From: Patrick Hamel, Environmental Health Officer
Date: June 27, 2000
Subject Smoking in Food Service Establishments
1. PURPOSE:
The purpose of the recent smoking survey that was sent out to all food service
establishments, and placed in the newspaper for public comment, was to determine if
there is support for a smoking ordinance that would eliminate or limit smoking in Town of
Vail restaurants.
2, BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Currently the Town of Vail regulates smoking in public places such as Town offices, post
offices, schools, and arenas. However, the Town does not regulate smoking in food
service establishments. The Town made the decision to allow the individual business
owners to choose whether of not they will allow smoking. This decision was made after
a public survey was sent out in 1988 that favored having individual businesses create
their own policy. The topic of banning smoking in restaurants was again brought_up in
1993, and again the public and the Town Council determined that further regulation was
not needed.
The Environmental Health Office has not received any complaints about smoking in
restaurants in the past 3 years, but this last ski season a council member did receive a
complaint concerning this issue. Since this topic has not been looked into for several
years, Council directed staff to see if there was any support for regulating smoking in
restaurants within the Town of Vail.
Town staff looked into several other communities in the area to see what their policies
were on smoking in restaurants. Breckenridge, Avon and Steamboat Springs do not
have any policy addressing smoking in restaurants. Boulder has a complete ban on
smoking in any public place within the city limits and Aspen had limited regulations on
smoking in eating-establishments (attachment A).
3. SUMMER 2000 SMOKING SURVEY
The smoking survey that was sent to all businesses that serve food in an enclosed
facility, (popcorn wagons and food carts were not included) had the same questions that
were sent on the 1988 survey. The survey consisted of the following questions:
1. Name of establishment
2. Do you currently permit smoking in your establishment?
3. Do you currently have a no smoking section?
4. Would you support some type of ordinance limiting smoking in
restaurants, taverns and bars?
5. Comments.
Of the 95 surveys sent out, 54 were completed and returned. Currently 23 of the 54
responding establishments permit smoking while 31 do not. Of the 23 restaurants that
permit smoking, 16 provide a no smoking section for their non-smoking customers while
7 do not.
There were 35 votes opposing a regulation and only 19 that favored a regulation.
Attached (attachment B) you will find the comments that were included on the completed
surveys.
4. QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL
Does council, wish to continue looking into the possible regulation of smoking in food
service establishments?
5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Since staff has not received complaints regarding smoking in restaurants, it appears that
restaurants have effectively dealt with smoking in a constructive way to limit conflict
between smokers and non-smokers.
ChalSter 13 http://wv v,.v.aspenaov-coni/El-Inew/city/smokereg.litnil
All
Chapter 13.16, SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES
Sections:
13.16.010 Short title.
13.16.020 LeLyislative intent and MWDOSes.
13.16.030 Definitions.
13.16.040 Smoking prohibited.
13.16.050 Structural modifications not required.
13.16.060 Regulation of smokintyin wlaces of enaulovanent.
13.16.070 Posting of si ins.
13.16.080 Exceptions.
13.16.090 Enforcement.
13.16.100 Penalties and relief.
ECHA.
13.16.010 Short title.
This chapter shall be known as and it may be cited as the "City of Aspen Clean Indoor Air Act."
(Ord. No. 35-1985, § 1-. Code 1971, § 11-4.1)
13.16.020 Legislative intent and purposes.
The city council finds that the smoking of tobacco, or any other weed or plant, is a form of air
pollution, a positive danger to health and a material annoyance, inconvenience, nuisance,
discomfort and a health hazard to those who are present in confined spaces, and in order to
serve public health, safety and welfare, the declared purpose of this chapter is to control and
limit the smoking of tobacco, or any weed or plant, in public places and places of employment
as hereinafter set forth. The city council intends that the restrictions and limitations of this
chapter be viewed as minimum standards, and should not be construed as limiting in any way
the authority of persons in control of a public place from prohibiting smoking within their
establishment altogether. (Ord. No. 35-1985, § 1: Code 1971, § 11-4.2)
13.16.030 Definitions.
(a) Bar area means an area comprising fifteen (15) feet or less from the perimeter of a
permanent counter which is primarily devoted to serving alcoholic beverages and within which
the service of food is only incidental to the consumption of such beverages. Although a
restaurant may contain a bar, the term "bar area" shall not include the restaurant/dining area.
I of 7 2/23/00 223 PM
r.
hapter 13 http://-,vww.aspeno.ov.com/EFInew/city/smokereg.litnil
The city council (or its designee) may extend the fifteen-foot limitation to encompass a larger
area upon a demonstration by the owner of an establishment that such area-is primarily
devoted to the serving of alcoholic beverages (such-as a barroom, cocktail lounge or similar
facility) and the service of food is only incidental to the consumption of such beverages.
(b) Dining area means any enclosed area containing a counter or tables upon which meals
are served, excluding the bar area.
(c) Enclosed means closed-in by a roof and four (4) walls with appropriate openings for
ingress and egress and is not intended to mean areas commonly described as public lobbies.
(d) Public place means any enclosed area to which the public is invited or in which the public
is permitted, including, but not limited to: Banks, education facilities, health facilities, public
transportation facilities, reception areas, restaurants, retail stores, retail service
establishments, waiting rooms. A private residence is not a public place.
(e) Smoking means the combustion of any cigar, cigarette, pipe, or similar article, using any
form of tobacco or other combustible substance in any form.
(f) Theater and auditorium means any enclosed area devoted to exhibiting motion pictures or
presenting theatrical performances, lectures or like entertainment.
(g) Employee means any person who is employed by any employer in consideration for
monetary compensation or profit.
(h) Employer means any person, partnership or corporation, including municipal corporation,
who employs the services of any person(s).
(i) Independently ventilated means that the ventilation system for any area in which smoking
is permitted and the ventilation system for any nonsmoking area do not have a connection
which allows for the mixing of air from the smoking and nonsmoking areas. To be considered
independently ventilated, the area shall be sufficiently sealed to prevent the escape of any
smoke to adjoining areas by the use of appropriate dry wall, windows, doors, paints and
sealants. The ventilation system shall be designed and operated so that there are no
discernable tobacco odors detectable outside the building, or in adjacent spaces in a multi-use
building. The ventilation system shall be an engineered system approved,by the Community
Development Department. The Community Development Department, prior to the issuance of
a building permit, shall verify compliance with the applicable provisions of this chapter and
shall review the submission of architectural, structural, electrical and HVAC plans as may be
required.
Q) Place of employment means any enclosed area under the control of a public or private
employer which employees normally frequent during the course of employment, including, but
not limited to, work area, employee lounges, conference rooms, and employee cafeterias. A
private residence is not a place of employment.
(k) Secondary activity area means that portion of an eating establishment which is physically
segregated; independently ventilated and primarily devoted to secondary activities within
which the service of food and alcoholic beverages is only incidental. Examples of secondary
of 7 2/23/00 2:23 PM
Chanter 13 hup:/hvw`v.aspengov_com/Ll-hiew/city/sniokereg.litiiil
activities include billiard rooms, game rooms, reading rooms and the like. A secondary activity
area; if not a free standing building, shall have an independent heating, ventilating and air
conditioning ("HVAC") system, completely isolated from all other HVAC systems used in a
common building structure. A common building structure, for purposes of this chapter, shall
mean the contiguous area of a public or private building that is known as a particular street
address and contains common exterior walls, notwithstanding-the partition of the interior space
to provide for separate business establishments or the existence of multiple levels, and shall
include common areas, areas of ingress or egress and escalators and/or elevators. (Ord. No.
35-1985, § 1; Ord. No. 1-1996, 1, 2: Code 1971, § 11-4.3)
13.16.040 Smoking prohibited.
(a) Elevators. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful within elevators in buildings generally
used by and open to the public, including elevators in office, hotel, and multifamily buildings.
(b) Hospitals and health care_ facilities. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in public areas
of health care facilities and hospitals, as defined in Section 25-3-101, C.R.S., as it may be
amended from time to time, including waiting rooms, public hallways and lobbies, except in
specially designated smoking areas that are physically separated and independently
ventilated.
(c) Public meeting rooms. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in hearing rooms,
conference rooms, chambers, places of public assembly in which public business is
conducted, which requires or provides direct participation or observation by the general public.
(d) Public restrooms. Smoking is prohibited and unlawful in public restrooms.
(e) Indoor service lines. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in indoor service lines in which
more than one person is giving or receiving services of any kind, whether or not such service
involves the exchange of money.
(f) Eating establishments. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in every publicly or privately
owned coffee shop, cafeteria, short-order cafe, luncheonette, sandwich shop, soda fountain,
restaurant, or other eating establishment serving food, except under the following
circumstances where smoking may be permitted at the option of the owner of the
establishment:
(1) Any area exterior to the building in which the establishment is located.
(2) The smoking of cigarettes in any bar area as defined in section 13.16.030(a). The smoking
of pipes and cigars shall not be permitted in such area.
(3) Any enclosed rooms which are being used for private functions.
,(4) In a secondary, physically separated and independent ventilated interior area that is
specifically designated and signed as a "Smoking Permitted" dining area, provided that such
secondary dining area shall not exceed in square footage an area equal to fifty (50) percent of
the square footage of the primary dining area. The smoking of pipes and cigars shall be
prohibited in such area.
3 of 7 2!23/00 2:23 PM
mpter 13 littp:/hv~vw.aspengov.com/EHnew/city/smokereg.huA `
(5) Smoking, including pipes and cigars, shall be permitted in a secondary activity area as
defined in section 13.16.030(k) located within an eating establishment if (i) such secondary
activity area is specifically designated and signed as a "Cigar and Pipe Smoking Permitted"
area; (ii) such secondary activity area has an engineered ventilation system approved by the
Community Development Department; and (iii) the owner provides a non-smoking secondary
activity area for identical uses and which is at least twice the floor area square footage of the
secondary activity area where the smoking of cigars and pipes is permitted.
(g) Retail stores. Smoking is prohibited and is unlawful in all public areas of retail stores,
including grocery stores, retail service establishments, retail food production establishments,
and drug stores. (Ord. No. 35-1985, § 1; Ord. No. 1-1996, § 3: Code 1971, § 11-4.4)
13.15.050 Structural modifications not required.
(a) Nothing in this chapter shall require the owner, operator, or manager of any existing
theater, auditorium, health care facility, or any existing building, facility, structure, or business,
to incur any expense to make structural or other physical modifications to any area.
(b) Nothing in this section shall relieve any person from the duty to post signs or adopt policies
as required by this chapter. (Ord. No. 35-1985, § 1: Code 1971, § 11-4.5)
13.16.060 Regulation of smoking in places of employment.
The places subject to regulation pursuant to section 13.16.040 shall not be deemed places of
employment for purposes of this section. The following regulations apply to places of
employment.
(a) Within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this chapter, each employer shall adopt,
implement, and maintain a written smoking policy which shall contain at a minimum the
following:
(1) Prohibition of smoking in employer conference and meeting rooms, classrooms,
auditoriums, restrooms, medical facilities, hallways, and elevators.
(2) Provision and maintenance of no smoking areas in cafeterias, lunchrooms and employee
lounges that effectively provide a smoke-free environment for nonsmoking employees.
(3) Any employee in the place of employment shall be given the right to designate his or her
immediate area as a nonsmoking area and to post it with appropriate signs or sign. The policy
adopted by the employer shall include a definition of the term immediate work area which gives
preferential consideration to nonsmokers.
(4) In any dispute arising in the work place under the smoking policy, the rights of the
nonsmoker shall be given precedence.
(5) Except where other signs are required, whenever smoking is prohibited, conspicuous signs
shall be posted so stating.
)F7 2/23/00 2:23 PM
Chapter 13 htip://www.aspengov.corn/EHnew/city/sinokere,,.Iitnil
1
(b) The smoking policy shall be communicated to a.1 employees within three (3) weeks of its
adoption.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, every employer shall have
the right to designate any place of employment as a nonsmoking area.
(d) This section is not intended to regulate smoking in the following places and under the
following conditions:
(1) A private home which may serve as a place of employment.
(2) Any property owned or leased by other governmental agencies.
(3) A private enclosed place of employment occupied exclusively by smokers, even though
such place of employment may be visited by nonsmokers, excepting places in which smoking
is prohibited by fire marshal or by other law, ordinance or regulation.
(e) An employer shall post "No Smoking" signs in any area designated as a nonsmoking area
and "Smoking Allowed" signs in any area designated as a smoking area. (Ord. No. 35-1985, §
1: Code 1971, § 11-4.6)
13.16.070 Posting of signs.
To advise persons of the existence of "No Smoking" or "Smoking Permitted" areas, signs shall
be posted as follows:
(a) In public places where no smoking is permitted pursuant to this chapter, a sign using the
words "No Smoking" and/or the international no smoking symbol shall be conspicuously
posted either on all public entrances or in a position clearly visible on entry into the
establishment.
(b) In public places where certain areas are designated. as smoking areas pursuant to this
chapter, the statement "No Smoking Except in Designated Areas" shall be conspicuously
posted on all public entrances or in a position clearly visible on entry into the establishment. In
addition, the person having the authority to manage and control any area designated as a
nonsmoking area pursuant to this chapter, shall post or cause to be posted and prominently,
displayed, and shall maintain "No Smoking" signs in conspicuous locations within said areas.
All such signs shall clearly and conspicuously recite the phrase "No Smoking" and/or use the
international no smoking symbol. The signs shall be posted not less than five (5) feet nor more
than eight (8) feet above floor level and shall be of sufficient number and location to cause the
message of at least one of the signs to be clearly visible, legible, and readable. (Ord. No.
35-1985, § 1: Code 1971, § 11-4.7)
1.3.16.080 Exceptions.
(a) "No Smoking" areas are not required, although they are encouraged, in private areas;
hotel, motel, and lodge meeting and assembly rooms rented to guests; hotel and motel lobbies;
areas and rooms while in use for private social functions, the facilities of a private or members
only organizations, private hospital rooms, psychiatric or psychological counseling facilities,
of 7 2/23/00 2:23 PM
inapter 13 http:/hvw,,v.aspengov.conVEI-nexv/city/smokereg.htnd
jails, bars, or stores that deal exclusively in tobacco products and accessories.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the smoking of pipes and cigars
shall not be allowed in hotel and motel lobbies.
(b) Any owner or manager of a business or other establishment subject to this chapter may
apply to the city council (or such board or commission of the city authorized by the city council
to grant the same) for an exception or modification of the provisions of this chapter due to
unique or unusual circumstances or conditions, provided that it will be the burden of the
applicant to show either that the provisions of this chapter cannot be complied with without
incurring expenses for structural or other physical modifications, other than posting signs, or
that due to unique or unusual circumstances, the failure to comply with the provision for which
the exemption is requested will not result in a danger to health or annoyance, inconvenience
or discomfort. (Ord. No. 35-1985, § 1: Code 1971; § 11-4.8)
13.16.090 Enforcement.
(a) The city manager or the city manager's designee shall be responsible for compliance with
this chapter with regard to facilities which are owned, operated, or leased by the City of Aspen.
(b) The owner, operator, or manager of any facility, business or agency shall post or cause-to
be posted all "No Smoking" signs required by this chapter. Owners, operators, managers or
employees of same shall be required to orally inform persons violating this chapter of the
provisions thereof. The duty to inform such violator shall arise when such owner, operator;
manager or employee of same becomes aware of such violation, and shall be their sole
enforcement obligation hereunder.
(c) Any citizen who desires to register a complaint under this chapter may initiate enforcement
with the city manager or city manager's designee.
(d) The city manager or the city manager's designee may enforce the provisions of this chapter
by either of the following actions:
(1) Servicing notice requiring correction of any violation of this chapter.
(2) Requesting the city attorney to initiate appropriate enforcement proceedings, including,
without limitation, the initiation of a complaint in municipal court or the institution of injunctive,
abatement, or other appropriate action to prevent, enjoin, abate or remove such violation.
(e) Any person convicted or violating any provision of this chapter shall, upon conviction, be
punished by a fine, up to the maximum amount allowed in section 1.04.080 of this Code, for
each separate offense, and may be enjoined from any further or continued violation thereof.
Each day any violation of this chapter shall continue shall constitute a separate offense.
(f) Any remedies provided for herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive and shall be in
addition to any other remedies provided by law. (Ord. No. 35-1985, § 1; Ord. No. 12-1996, §
10: Code 1971, § 11-4.9)
13.16.100 Penalties and relief.
)f7 2/28/00 2:23 PNI
Chapter 13 http:/h~ryvw.aspen-ov.cotn/F-Hnew/city/sniokere,,.htiw
J
(a) Any person, upon conviction of a violation of arty provision of this title, shall be subject to a
fine, imprisonment, or both a fine and imprisonment; as set forth in section 1.04.080 of this
Code, for each separate offense, and may be enjoined from any further or continued violation
hereof. A violation of Chapter 13.16 shall be punishable by a fine only. Each day any violation
of this title shall continue, shall constitute a separate offense hereunder.
(b) In addition to the penalties and relief provided for in subsection (a) hereof, any person
found in violation of any provision of sections 13.04.010 to 13.04.100 of this title shall
reimburse the city for any expenses incurred in preventing pollution of the municipal water
supplies caused by said person, any expenses incurred in restoring municipal water supplies
to the standards set forth in section 13.04.020, or any expenses incurred in improving any
intake, treatment facility or other part of the water works, which improvement is necessitated by
the violation found hereunder. (Ord. No. 44-1981, § 1; Ord. No. 12-1983, § 8, Ord: No.
35-1985, § 1; Ord. No. 12-1996, § 9: Code 1971, § 11-5.1)
is
I Lack to Envirotlr iePtal Health Horr-e Pa~,e.
Last Updated on 7/22/99
By Richard Sackett
7 of 7 2/23/00 2:23 PM
r
Attachment B
Comments from smoking survey:
KB Ranch "We wish to retain the right to allow smoking for special groups"
Micky's Bar "There should be no limited smoking in bars"
Pasta Pronto "Some taverns have a smoking area, this is o.k. A lot of people still smoke, I don't think
smoking should be around food"
Uptown Grill Letter attached
Left Bank "No changes need to be done, our policy keeps all our customers happy"
Lakota Chops "My experience in California shows that when smoking was eliminated, businesses
experienced a significant drop in revenue"
Kaltenberg "We cater to a lot of European guests who smoke"
Half Moon "There are plenty of restaurants that have no smoking or no smoking until I0:00pm, the
rest have a no smoking area. This is unneeded government intrusion"
Red Lion "I feel the restaurants have done a great job of setting smoking provisions of their own"
The George Letter attached
Alpenrose "It should be to each restaurant what they would like to do"
China Garden "We believe those decisions are solely the responsibility of owner/managers. Since they
directly effect cash flow and tax revenue, please leave these ordinances to the
restaurateurs"
Vail Myriad Letter attached
Tyrolean "I strongly believe that each restaurant knows its customers better than the Town of Vail
and should be allowed to implement individual smoking policies unhindered by national
or local government" Letter also attached.
Daily Grind "Enough rules already! I think the restaurant community has responded well to their own
customers and we are all happy with the current system. If there is an occasional
customer who is unhappy with how a specific restaurant handles smoking, there are lots
of other choices for them"
May Palace "ABSOLUTELY opposed to any ordinance!"
Sweet Basil "Although we do not permit smoking at Sweet Basil, I strongly oppose legislation that
prohibits smoking in privately owned businesses" '
Up the Creek "Each individual should be able to decide their own policy"
La Cantina "For some restaurants to allow smoking should be their right"
T
Larkspur "We would like to have the option. We might have a section on our deck that we will use
as a smoking area"
Tap Room "This should be self regulated by each establishment. I have many other reasons also.
Feel free to contact me at 479-0500"
Les Delices "It should be the owners decision"
Sundance "I would only support a no-smoking policy if it was County-wide. If you acted on Vail
alone, everyone would go to Eagle-Vail, Avon, Edwards, Etc. When Beverly Hills, CA.
acted unilaterally, they lost 30 to 40% of their restaurant/bar business and they repealed
it.
Dancing Bear "Bars need to allow smokers, it's a question of profitability. I wouldn't mind requiring
some type of venting system"
Ore House "Please leave it up to the individual establishment"
Vendetta's "The Town of Vail should stay out of private business. Government has no business
telling me how to operate my business. We will organize the restaurant association and
defeat any non-smoking ordinance!"
Clancy's "I believe it would hurt many businesses. Let owners do their own enforcement"
Club Chelsea "To answer the above question is controversial for us. We have a smoking section
already and rely on that room"
Trail's End "Trail's End is one of several facilities that Vail Mountain Dining operates and the only
one where smoking is permitted. The reason smoking is permitted is because it is
permitted at other locations that offer the same type of service and apres-ski. If the Town
enacted an ordinance that prohibited smoking in restaurants, bars and taverns, then every
operation would be on the same playing field and we would support the ordinance"
Crossroads Cinema "Promote healthful living can only be a plus to Vail's reputation"
Cascade Theatre "Vail should be a leader in this movement"
Pepi's "I am all for no smoking in restaurants and public facilities. Hotel rooms included since I
am a supporter of cancer research programs"
Marriot "we will support any ordinance that prohibits smoking in closed areas"
Terra Bistro "Smoking should not be allowed in any public facility mentioned in letter. We as a
restaurant in a health club are extremely opposed to the idea. We support any and all
legislation prohibiting smoking in public areas that are completely and partially enclosed,
as well as oppose smoking in any business that sells food or beverage"
Cucina Rustica "Due to our international clientele we have a limited smoking area"
Wildflower "We would support sections or limited smoking area"
Pazzo's "No smoking is good"
Domino's "Smoke free restaurants are currently the only kind of place we will eat"
r
Name of establishment:
Do you currently permit smoking in your establishment? YES _ NO
S o~teg c.c~rx~ts
Do you currently have a no smoking section? YES NO 2 LwV- 5
Would you support some type of ordinance limiting smoking in restaurants, taverns and bars? YES NOS AJ61 'o d
Comments:
Respectfully to the Town Council:
I pay close attention to the issues facing the council. I read every agenda for work
sessions and regular meetings. I know there are many diverse and pressing issues
currently under discussion. Which is why I find it so perplexing that town government
would want to take on or disturb something that is currently working so well.
I say it is working well because I firmly believe that our business is a service industry and
service is foremost in every restaurateur's mind. We want to satisfy the greatest number
of people possible. We want people to return to Vail. The fact remains we do have
customers who smoke. If we can figure out how to accommodate both, we should do so.
Let each place regulate with their individual circumstances in mind.
The climate surrounding the smoking issue has changed considerably since the council
first considered it. Our smoking customer is far more understanding. Now the feeling is
more than smoking is a privilege rather than a right and others need to be considered. If
given choices the smoking customer is happy to comply.
And as one of our European customers said, "if you would just regulate guns as closely
as you do smoking you would be far better off'.
Sincerely,
G~/l
Susan Fritz
- 3
WDJUN07
2000
TOWN NVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
May 31, 2000
Dear Restaurateur,
The Town of Vail currently prohibits smoking in Public Places that are located in the following
establishments: health care facilities, schools, retail stores, child care centers, banks, theatres, sporting
arenas, laundromats, post offices and municipal facilities. The Town does not regulate smoking in
restaurants, bars or taverns. It is up to the individual owner to decide if they want no smoking sections in
their facility or no smoking entirely. The Town is considering implementing some type of no smoking
ordinance in restaurants, bars and taverns. Before serious consideration is given to an ordinance the Town
Council requested some input from you, the restaurateur.
Please take the time to answer the questions on the back of this page, as your input is valuable to the
outcome of the possible ordinance. Once you have completed the questions please use the self addressed
stamped envelop and drop it in the mail. Thank you for your help.
Si erely
Patrick Hamel
Environmental Health Specialist
i
Z L Gig /~7.r=
1(717- C)
a
RECYCLED PAPER
Name of establishment: /wY2r,t> iAJL
Do you currently permit smoking in your establishment? YES NO
Do you currently have a no smoking section? YES
Would you support some type of ordinance limiting smoking in restaurants, tavems and bars? YES v0
Comments:
12- %o,r -I-- ht L? c vim' ve v/" f/f~ v L-.J /J<
G%'i N--~t,l"~ I~~~ c'''t ,.,1.TLF~~`-- UcK i tr~~ ~ (-c c~ /1~
~ R-L-c~J i"~ v i ?,--L / c~v C~ J~A~S' ~-i 1'<-f 6~-t ~~.~c.~-S
e3 G- 73~Lry X11 Tr`r~ > ~,;~s'
~~-I w "rte:' ~ cam. ~7`T.~,r c c~'~-roc c'~~" ~,,f-~r-- ,~'~c.~
,Sf1~`Krr~'Lf- ~~'L.rLy %`~.h=~:;' /'2.~.?`"%`-`: - ~`=f/rt,!~-SJ -
/Oe
C._r !1'z T'/o~/ P r~t ~J 7 / l =G
r - .
To: Vail Town Council
From: Russ Forrest
Date: June 27, 2000
Subject Community Facilities Process Update
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this worksession is to update Council on next steps in the community
facilities process. The following are two issues for the Town Council's consideration and a
summary of next steps.
ISSUES FOR COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION
ELECTION OPTIONS:
This issue does not need to be decided today but should be considered within the
context of our overall discussions from a timetable and strategic planning standpoint.
VRD has clarified its mission and has determined it will operate facilities but will not build
facilities. Based on the economic analysis, it may be possible to build the public uses
without public funding (aside from the value of the land which the Town will retain
ownership of). The private sources of funding could include:
• Corporate/private sponsorship
• Sale of parking spaces
• Sale of dwelling units or fractional fee units
• Revenue_frnm the MD,.00Q/rnnm1
The total cost of the public uses ranges from $50 million to $100 million. If Dobson is
maintained in its current location the cost is closer to $50 million. Unless the program is
altered significantly, private financing will be needed to build these uses. Creating
public uses that are entirely financed by private sources would greatly simplify the
process. We could take the next year to implement a fund raising campaign (after a
specific site plan is chosen). Then, in 2001, determine whether and how to move
forward with a public vote. It would be possible to do a non-binding referendum (at any
time in the year) to determine if the public supported the final concept. If private fund
raising fell short, then a binding public vote would also be possible in November of 2001.
By moving the vote to 2001, we will be able to allow for adequate time to come to a
decision on the site plan and the architecture and to initiate a fund-raising campaign.
Right now the schedule is based on being prepared for a public vote in November of
1
1
l6
2000. Given that one year of fund raising was anticipated, it would not drastically delay
the project to _ look at a 2001 ballot issue (if you believe a public vote is necessary).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ARCHITECTURAL WORK
Does the Council want additional architectural work to occur prior to July 18th?
We have tentatively scheduled July 18th as the date to begin narrowing in on a site plan.
The scope of service for EDAW has essentially been completed. The basic purpose of
the contract with EDAW was to develop alternative site plans. If Phase III homeowners
are receptive to a win/win solution regarding alternative 3, staff believes it is critical to
develop architectural renderings of a new library since this is an existing building the
community is very passionate about. Also architectural renderings for any of the
alternatives will be valuable for gaining support for a particular concept. Another critical
question is whether the Council wants to add an additional architect to the design team.
On May 23rd Council indicated that this was not necessary. As you recall, staff did
provide portfolios on several other design firms.
INPUT FROM JUNE 14TH
Attached is a summary of the public input from the June 14th public meeting.
STATUS OF ALTERNATIVES
Hotel: The financial analysis indicates a hotel is viable on this site and a
Iearn ing/meeting center would have a positive impact on other hotels. However, this is
based on several assumptions: 1) The newly planned hotels i.e. Gondola site hotel and
Vail Plaza Inn would generate new demand; and 2) existing hotels will not want to
release significant numbers of rooms 12-24 months in advance during peak winter and
summer periods for meeting participants. We will be testing these assumptions in the
next two weeks with the hotel community.
Alternatives 1&2: On June 14th the design team presented variations on alternatives
1&2. Variations on alternatives 11& 2 can accommodate additional private development
and a hotel. Alternative 1 appears to be financially viable. However, with some
additional work, the design team believes we could make alternative 2 financially viable
as well. This may require creating additional dwelling units or timeshare units versus
hotel rooms.
Alternative 3:1 have met with Marilyn Dyer and made it clear the Town will not consider
condemnation of Phase III. If Phase III does want to consider working with the Town on
alternative 3, 1 hope to receive some indication of that interest by July 11th. However, it
will take several months to adequately determine the specific spatial or monetary needs
of the homeowners to facilitate a win/win solution. Staff also believes that with regard to
alternative 3 it is critical to leave Dobson in its current location to reduce the total cost.
This is physically possible. Also, this maintains the focus of the community uses in the
plaza and significantly reduces the costs. The major design consideration is whether the
2
Council and the community believe the public plaza is of significant enough value to
justify the associated costs.
PROPOSED HUB SITE SCHEDULE
Action Start Finish Who
Develoo alternative site plans
Design Charette-develop alternative ideas Mon 3/27/00 Design Team
Refine and Test Ideas
Test Ideas with stakeholders Mon 4/17/00 Fri 6/8/00 Staff & DT
Complete cost estimates Mon 5/1/00 Fri 6/2/00 EDAW
Complete Market Analysis of a hotel Wed 5/3/00 Tue 5/23/00 ERA&EDAW
VRD/TOV Meeting to review alternatives Tue 5/23/00 TOVNRD
Design team prepares for public presentations Tue 5p/23/00 6/14/00 Design Team
Develop draft operational plan recommendations Thu 5/4/00 Thu 6/8/00 Staff & EDAW
Process to choose a preferred alternative
Public Presentation of alternative ideas Wed 6/14/00 Staff/Design
Joint VRD and Council Meeting Tue 7/11/00 (evening)
Worksession and Evening Meeting Tue 7/18/00
Final ADDroval of Preferred Alternative/Ballot Initiative
1st Reading of an Ordinance Tue 8/1/00 or Tues 8/15/00
2nd Reading of an Ordinance Tue 8/15/00 or Tues 9/5/00
Public Vote for Funding Mon 11/6/00
Note: Next steps after this phase would include continued fund raising, development of
the architecture, and development review.
F:\cdev\COUNCI L\MEMOS\00\COM627.doc
3
June 14, 2000 Community Facilities Hub Site Meeting
Group 1
Scheme One
Likes:
• Doesn't use Phase III
• Preserves capital assets (Library, Dobson)
• Can Move Forward quickly
Dislikes:
• Not financially viable
• Lacks sense of community (Whistler does)
• Conference center too much of island needs better connection to outdoors
• Too little retail to activate space
• Not viable with hotel-do housing instead
• Lacks outdoor community space near Dobson/Library
Scheme Two
Likes:
• Public space without taking lodge at Lionshead III
• Bridge over creek
• Save Doson & Library
• Includes convention center (use for convention & performing arts)
• Learning center for locals
• Provides public facilities
Dislikes:
• Bridge over creek
• Hotel not viable - replace with housing
• No dedicated performing arts
• Blocks views from Vail International
• Perception that hotel will be controlled by VA (use Copper Mountain?)
Scheme 3A
Likes:
• Wonderful town entry, public space
• More financially viable (3A)
• Retail - activates public plaza
• Library looks out on plaza
• Community theater off plaza
Dislikes:
• Loses Phase III (major legal battle& delay)
• Hotel not viable - replace with more housing
• No "performing arts" (dedicated space)
• Parking uncertainties
• Bridge to south side of gore creek
4
Group 2
Scheme One
Works:
• Design feels more intimate than Scheme 2
• Housing on west end of garage feels more integrated
Needs work:
• Bigger water element
• Financial feasibility
• Employee housing to expensive in this location
Scheme Two
Works:
• Dobson & Library intact
• Lodge at Lionshead intact
• Learning center element
Needs work:
• Trying to solve all problems on this site - employee housing
• $12.5 mil replace with market..., need to maximize
• Vail in hotel /real estate business
• Glass towers not practical
• Have private elements overtaken public elements
Scheme Three
Works (3A, 38):
Needs Work:
(3A) - -
• competition with retail in Lionshead?
• Too much commercial?
• Changing library
• Need for large public space
(36)
• How can it ever happen?
• Taking of Phase III Lodge of Lionshead
Group Three
Scheme One
Works:
• In favor of long term replacement of Dobson scheme 3)
• Don't take the condos
Needs work:
• Lacks plaza space
5
• Develop phase method that delays the condo's issue
• A lot like Cascade with its problems
• Community gets nothing, just another hotel
• No place to hang out and have lunch
Scheme Two
Works:
• Nothing
• Did not take condos
• Access off frontage appears bigger than the 3's
• With all 3: tram is great
Needs Work:
• Doesn't excite me, our last chance
• Does it make sense to put employee housing in this location?
• This is a boring scheme
• Toughest for $
Scheme Three
Works:
• Beautiful complex
• Pond is liked
• Finances (3A)
• Plaza (like Whistler)
• Tower to connect visually
• Helps compete beyond our immediate region
Needs Work:
• Overkill with "new" space (upgrade spaces we already have)
• Taking private property
• Presents competition with Lionshead
• Overall $ shortfall for funding
• Terms keep changing: family center...
convention center...
community center...
learning center
General Comments:
• Some feel all schemes too ambitious, therefore don't favor any
6
C
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, June 21, 2000
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Clark Brittain
Bill Pierce
Hans Woldrich
Melissa Greenauer
Tom Weber (PEC)
SITE VISITS 2:00 pm
1. Zachara residence - 5133 Black Bear Lane
2. Town Manger's residence - 2507 Arosa Drive
3. Brandess Building - 2077 N. Frontage Road
4. Vickers residence - 375 Forest Road
5. Fritch residence - 183 Gore Creek Drive
6. Vista Bahn Building - 333 Hanson Ranch Road
7. Pearson residence - 303 Gore Creek Drive #2G.
Driver: Allison
PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm
1. Dreyer residence - Final review of a new primary/secondary residence. Allison
5114 Grouse Lane/Lot 6, .Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Raymond & Margarita Dreyer, represented by John Railton
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 4-1 (Bill against)
APPROVED
2. Vista Bahn Building - Conceptual review of a deck extension. Allison
333Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1St Filing.
Applicant: Remonov and Company
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
3. Town Manager's Residence - Final review of proposed exterior modifications Ann
2507 Arosa Drive / Lot 5, Block D, Vail Das Schone Fil. 1
Applicant: Town of Vail
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS:
TOWN OF PAIL
1
i
9
1. That the proposal incorporate the comments made by the Board during the meeting
2. That the stucco colors be approved as presented at the meeting
3. That 6 new trees be planted at the southeast portion of the property
4. That the proposed trash enclosure is moved back 2 feet from the front corner of the
building by the garage and that the roof extend to within 2 feet of the rear corner of the
building
5. That the use of wood trim on the windows is strongly recommended
6. That staff shall review all final specifications
4. Vickers residence - Separation request. Allison
375 Forest Road/Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Village 3`d
Applicant: Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
WITHDRAWN AT APPLICANT'S REQUEST
5. Fritch residence - Final review of a dormer addition. Brent
183 Gore Creek Drive (Sitzmark)/Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village 15' Filing.
Applicant: Robert Fritch
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. The dormer roof shall have a gable form with a min. 1' overhang and a roof pitch and colors t
match the existing building.
2. The application also requires additional approval from the Planning and Environmental
Commission.
6. Zachara residence - Conceptual review of a new single-family residence. Brent
5133 Black Bear Lane/ Lot 14, Block 2, Gore Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Kurt Davis
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
7. Brandess Building - Final review of rooftop antennas. Brent
2077 N. Frontage Rd./Lot 39, Buffehr Creek.
Applicant: Jayne Brandess Revocable Trust
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. The mounting brackets shall be lowered so the bottom portion is no higher than 2' above the
existing roof parapet.
2. The antennas and mounting supports must be painted to match the existing building.
8. Pearson residence - Final review of proposed 250 addition and exterior remodel. George
303 Gore Creek Drive #2G/Lot 2, Block 5, Vail Village 15t.
Applicant: Vickie Pearson, represented by Ron Diehl
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL JULY 5, 2000
2
v
Y
9. Gore Creek Whitewater Park - Final review of the placement of boulders and plant Brent
materials within the Gore Creek Stream Tract.
Gore Creek Promenade/Tracts I & A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1St Filing.
Applicant: Vail Valley Tourism and Convention Bureau & Town of Vail
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL JULY 5, 2000
Staff Aoorovals
Hochtl residence - Re-roof. Ann
890 Red Sandstone Circle/Lot 5, Vail Village 9th Filing.
Applicant: Christie and Karl Hochtl
Red Lion Building - Roof replacement on south Y2. George
304 Bridge Street/Lot C-1 - C-7, Vail Village 1St Filing.
Applicant: Richard Brown
Dickson residence - Addition of boulder retaining wall. Allison
1817 Meadow Ridge Road, Unit 1/Lot 21, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Phyllis Dickson
Lord Gore Restaurant - Installation of a Make Up Air Unit.. Brent
595 Vail Valley Drive/Lots A,B,C, Vail Village 7tn
Applicant: Robert McCleary
Hilliard residence - Heated driveway and window addition. Allison
1801 Sunburst Drive/Lot 2, Vail Valley 3`d.
Applicant: R. Glen Hilliard
Valley Condominiums - Clubhouse repair. George
1510 Buffehr Creek Road/Parcel A, Lionsridge 2"d Filing.
Applicant: Valley Condominiums
Adam residence - Window addition. Brent
765 Forest Road/Lot 8, Block 2, Vail Village 6th Filing.
Applicant: Nancy Adam
Telemark Townhomes - Repaint. Ann
1090 Vail View Drive-1083 Lionsridge Loop/Lot B-1, Telemark Townhouse.
Applicant: John Cogswell
Ryerson residence - Window addition and landscaping. George
4859 Meadow Drive/ Lot 16, Block 5, Bighorn 5th Additon.
Applicant: Tony Ryerson
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356,Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
3
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
Monday, June 26, 2000
PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits : 1:00 pm
1. Davis residence - 5133 Black Bear Lane
2. Bernardo residence - 4718 Meadow Drive
3. Gross residence - 4255 Columbine Way
4. Remonov and Company - 333 Hanson Ranch Road
Driver: George
WD
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00-6:30 p.m.
Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the establishment of outdoor patio dining and
seating, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road (Vista Bahn Building)/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st
Filing.
Applicant: Remonov and Company
Planner: Allison Ochs
2. A request for a front setback variance from Section 12-6C-6, Vail Town Code and a side setback
variance from Section 12-6C-6, Vail Town Code, to allow for a new single-family residence,
located at 5133 Black Bear Lane/Lot 14, Block 2, Gore Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Kurt Davis
Planner: Brent Wilson
3. A request for a variance from Section 12-6F-6, to allow for a garage addition, located at 4718
Meadow Drive/Tract B, Bighorn Townhomes Subdivision.
Applicant: Bill Bernardo, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
Planner: Allison Ochs
4. A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed setback variance from Section 12-6G-6 of
the Town Code, located at 4255 Columbine Way. #16/Lot 16, Bighorn Terrace.
Applicant: Bob Gross
Planner: Allison Ochs
TOWN OF PAIL A
1
5. A request for a conditional use permit, to add,a Type II Employee Housing Unit to an existing
primary unit, located at 375 Forest Road/Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Village 3`d Filing.
Applicant: Greg Vickers, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
Planner: Allison Ochs
WITHDRAWN
6. _ SELECTION OF PEC REPRESENTATIVE AT DRB FOR 2000-
Doug Cahill - Jan-Apr. 5, '00
Chas Bernhardt - Apr 19, '00
Galen Aasland - May 3, '00
Brian Doyon - May 17, '00
No Rep - Jun 7, '00
Tom Weber - Jun 21, '00
Diane Golden - Jul-Sep '00
John Schofield - Oct-Dec '00
7. Information Update
? Discuss moving meeting to Council Chambers
8. Approval of June 12, 2000 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing
Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published June 23, 2000 in the Vail Trail
2
i4 APRIL 2000
41
~ VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW
Ton OF wny,~ June 22, 2000
The April Vail Business Review examines sales tax collections for April and the ski season
(April - November).
Overall April sales tax decreased 5.9% with Retail decreasing .3%, Lodging decreased 13.8%,
Food and Beverage decreased 5.2% and Other (which includes items such as utilities, taxable services
i.e. plumbing and electrical and rentals or leases) decreased 8.9%. The ski season collections resulted in
a .5% decrease overall with Retail decreasing .01%, Lodging decreased 2.4%, Food and Beverage
increased 2.6% and Other decreased 2.5%.
April Special Events and Groups Included
1999 I 2000
Red Bull Mogul Mania 2000 Snowshoe Shuffle
A Taste of Vail Mountain Dew Vertical Challenge
Ski Tarn SOS Boardercross
Warren Miller's Mad Mountain Marathon A Taste of Vail
Rip-A-Thon Snowboard Casino 2000
K2 Winter Fun Games Warren Miller's Mad Mountain Marathon
Jimmie Heuga's International Snow Express + Jimmie Heuga's Snow Express
V4 Snowboard Series Battle of the Ski Schools
World Synchronized Ski Championships Budweiser Street Beat Series Conclusion
Mountain Travel Symposium
Casino `99
The 1.4% Vail Marketing District tax went into effect January 1, 2000. This tax is charged on
the purchase price paid or charged to persons for rooms or accommodations and is only charged on
short-term rentals (less than 30 days). The State of Colorado will collect this tax on a quarterly basis
and questions concerning it should be directed to the Department of Revenue at 303-232-2416.
Sales tax forms and the Vail Business Review are available on the internet at http://ci.vail.co.us.
Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax
collections, as opposed to actual.gross sales.
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125 or Steve
Thompson at (970) 479-2116.
Sincerely,
s
Sally Lorton
Sales Tax Administrator
APRIL 2000 SALES TAX
VAIL VILLAGE
April April April
1999 2000 %
Collections Collections Change
a"„:?,i,`'
-°'ri:'s'Y'.~i:;p.=s' y~'~`;`>'E?#;et,: ".,r'•cr;%' ;'..?~-fir;;{,z ':x'•r~^-C:
:l!.n~o~oYyy+p~Sn'
"i.9'.Y..q :,x'~'{„ ,y'. ~YJ. ^'.a... ..,`?^.;i':4'1_. :a}i=£.-,;Mi~."' f~P'`fi. ::~[e` { ,j'-'~.S-~-t'^r~•
1.....5/0
< v
70,14
Retail
rsa ;Li>'>G ~..,z,.•;z!f.,':~'{ , "_.'g';^v" sf ys. r'',=,;,t,;. w.,; .
3;~,,"^.„~ •x:'- `'f,, ~`~,7?r :rr;~'i=::f"~'•~- ,'e". '~ri„ r. ,*a.' `.r.5~`^':'r'"°,?„'^q
Lodging 11"1~_.9 r{: •t.; w~::~ R~~,. ,
r,:'r,•:,,.• .9"~ 'i,M"Tit:«r;`
n,;~ ssue~'' y;-;
,;r..};'o- `'~;^,,.:1?k vr,-,7'''P., r~, ,'~..,gk. -A~ ;~`s~_y'PetY ,d~a''=t+:a•d(.~
r,.r: °r p~3-~.. ",z'•.dY~', e;~v^.'#~,.' ,,g,, '~~^.f.•,<i.;T., ..`£1,,'?,<y"'c",::+.:3#~~~"~s'';'
Food &
~
'~:..P ~^.,e'"~G' ~',,.a'f,'.,'i: ~sz~4^,w ' u s•":3,z'. vy~.:',~.<~,.nh i. „y3=
Bevera a ;3t) °~1:9~~
=~Yn,r:,~!?k,~xoonn 'r ~''•_'.~';•,>?'°2={.is-2:,r~'9t+r,;;tv',m{a~3~~:.:,=~~.z :2~`.'~.i'~.1.,?(~,«:rza ~'a"A. ~,k,^r",gw';;,s~ :v~°"i~~•."%''~,."f~t,<.,
W~ „f~:,, t`~;F.;''wg, fir, '~s fj~ / ^"•f••':.. e. •'g':':'.:.." ~k",.,;,,.;:~•..~;
Other 3£3
=;:k •rr~a .~%i?7~.V.~,i rd~*~.::.m,.: 'fie-~ ,n 1. ~>a«-~~'ti~,ri:-, ib=,"h,.'n< ~
fm7,7a,?..: s'3'~4,s`f'
ar:>: ; : k:. aqa ,u
bs,
AI z,i?.i
tt~;..dzs{:,f;'fp.. '~~,`.'rr,'<~;~`'~z r:~.°<: 3".,~`:„i•^:" .:r"~Lr?.,.a
`.K'.".~P''.' ..+i+:'r/~~ f~j;?,, 3,, "`,r,'•~` :.;t ~~'~'l :.k.~,.: .~.tl„`;r::
,OM Ads, 464" Total '>41'p "552 4 ~E ...;.:r,'<=q;,°=1=2. a
,
t-,r~`Y;''
.ire':"ir`""".ii<'< 'rt'•'':;i', :
y y^.~ :,:a;;r'Rtu,°.'a:.s ,s '~'<e~;:~f=': ~iPd°i {,y F;',~':2z.~.r r: G:'•b y' ,a;rs>r.,:, '=':"t k:'+e.3;.r%',w:'
LIONSHEAD
April April April
1999 2000 %
Collections Collections Change
i r:i~~4 i,d,-..' nry,: •~,st+.:S ~-+tt• 34,x' 4j
Pi-
":,a„„t;"I~,f r:A>'•: rr•M° siK;h',>~~;`"`::;- 3~~t;'sr"~t^,. 9=°a',';{:;
z~•~ w~'b'.~i .5 y zn; e".., r,:3:~.:a,;.~ z.t,~¢,5g ; ,.'::yi„ ,,,a,,q
.',xs'fv,.. e±31 y'E`.~'b.. C~:{'p` ,3-' ~'3' GF;<p, .,F7;.,:'.,} j:=;q_'.:9:,,,....-:b ~':~.^b: f, ;'L'.
F;~L:" ~y w% 'q~:::,';'i"~u„L^' ~.o";~;;,•x,
;:.'{a;,
NMI
17., 4 A '
F9.'382A,=' _
Retail
:3-,a,""E' n..,.,,a,;,..,•s: "8,,.,"r,':..r.<''..Eµ„;.. g ,.us,"u p<. vr.
A-, i.t~;1. t'd^, :i:~'$ ,'n.:,t2,fyv;,. '~'"?a~'1.'"i ,'~~¢?ks^~:f'~"f:-^^S`` zji:x.:Y:'s 1~.,:.:~,~:;.
~ r.F+~o D>:~:~'~i -Y'»;~ 8h'".,,y •'$:~i ,:G~:. ,ii3.`S~:' fa'~'s<: _
~~F.~"'~~A•'-.~t;4 `t~: f.., 4.:f I~u~~.i~. ~,13,~n~'u '^,..`?»w;: a£.1-u.:i.?i, :,<•',.;f ~u~r,
Lodging _ ~;a~ ' ~Yfi6 ;04;5 z-ad,;~a~a5'~~'l+
'v1,
s~..w:, tom: 'a n-'
,bi''"' Z-1- eR,"~'
:rj t~y;=ra;~'';q~s:F'~'. zii~,`x«3 r~:5v,A' 'I 'tfl,i,.~.,x
Sr~; ; 4«,,..•'.,"w, ?Z',:}` ..,ail SNA~ii, s,F".`,'',~fy3...::_Li ~'~,~z-'A-~t.« ;3~~e'q'i.'e'+"±,°~,3:"y,.~<,y ~ ,..1.
z^; r.a>=" , ,c-"<,'`~w rs ,%12 r.'•<;':. 1a•.,R..p:-~
p A`'' ,z i#.~ `'fit, •t`~. 7a..~,~".: ~,..,.a:14'4i+~ 4~", r•,
Food 3';
O~ •''-;~~'"`~`";.~p;:~';a~ '!''~'~rd+gs`' ~>:"~+~4," ~r<.",^}~`r,• ~,,'~zrt e;;~..:°,..i'~' 4, '
:r
"Fu::;yy^~,., .
~~.;-,36~..5~4~=~:,:~„=y~
Beverage
^w~<;~w>:a' «1 • r"r'.,,e£°', _
si 4~• : '~,y
A
m~i' ~:.tt;' :s`x=«. ~Z`F=;r.: ,,r,,, soy, stca-... ~;;...~:x'' vk~•»ns,S: ~,t>, ~w.,;.M,~..,,y `ji~.,,•s..,~'~p
i~: ,
Other ~k-'10~
,f':.., :f,^`....3{S~i'
"~EE
;`,`?':<'P'i,3;:;
r i"'',1u9 "!'x°?'.,Y..7ca° tt',n -'jtk s• ..,?.tie-:,:*, ,',zk'S~,.^x... r: •~,e _ "~".z.:','t: ~iif~
ef;~+i.~
rs`'. >,qo s,?~" z:4-.. ...M .;w, ,r.: s~°•' tai,-
a.i~" ,',s'< ;it,~x :K: e,. {;€.y: x.,,3 :=~YtirTY-,~-: r~ t... . - f..;,:
~i L;. S&.: tk'v,ss'~ ~••~>,..s ...`''Std'.,, y;•
.61
:,::;,,,x
..,ym ..,t S•r5u
Total Y.. WIN
'.ar '
'
.~~Wr~
,~r ,;.~~a,'"''±•-z`';»~'"v',T.Y£:,`.<.•.
,z• Win.
APRIL 2000 SALES TAX
CASCADE VILLA GE/EAST VAILISANDSTONEIWEST VAIL
April April April
1999 2000 %
Collections Collections Change
ry 4:; K
*'rS,• '-,y:" '"~g• 9.~ o4`B,: ,itE:„j.i:':r ~'y"t",..
-.~;k' ^~.::r`R ,;..,;2.>; .;„:',~:~4p~~~~tl~.!'Y n•n .>:'n:?;e'.;p..z~ +r7,a '„0~s-~:
•`"4i, s.~~l_ry^•p`"~~ +:-Jl~y ,3 i... s~'~f'.'~.~ipY.'°,
„Gaa~ ;,~~~~»r;s r neap";i~ir',,;~~,~wr-<::
-s s,r ,i': t+f;•n•4°°i*,::
,22'x.7 r. r = 1,4:3.,10
Retail .107205`sx:..-;
±C~~"n:fP~° '$:'~(Kt„R'e.^",' ~'aj:<•'f °<j ;4 ~S.E..~ ij~~',~.<,mr"
- .„j„ 4P ~Li T~.I ~~.'}s..~. '`',:.:n;~q n~"f.•_.,<~+;~%t,i~'y`... ....,.:n_
:.•.p'•.t •:l,"^ Ar:iy.t uj~ "2 ~,`:S",vv3::`'-° ::'~1,'~.1,. .
,;nq• ° s.3hrrt ,..J' ' .9,1'ir ' ~,I:
c; t~ ,\C•~ :`cEE~:h rr r'ca$ .;;~w~' ="r°1:'y." "f.
9 .
Lod9in
r§'~„~,E_.._.~ ~ f :<.;s; ~ ~'`3~, 3 ^n,~r,~,t~t:,F: t- t 3r ~
t,.~-" .~F; y: *,yt'rG r'sw •awp^ a k ~t' ;r„' x ~ .v4 i" a'
~.";xf~r- r<}`~"~' y.«~~;tt s s~~'~^cHf z r ~-t~ e~'t;~?„»: "f t,,:,, "
Food &
Bevera a 29;`.579.l:e,'
g
.Y,:';z'^,~ ja?` a,y": A ~''nir 9~°~e.', L:., `Q.:'c•a `s4r' <P~i.~ ~ „.4: ia. „vfa:;.'x~^.,riC:;,"~'`,:«:;;,
?.t~x''•€„i. .J-~ W.~e•.'>°a'ur3'.'; ~.:-,9. '`7 z~':,';'~ ,~~3.
`ph`...:3s'i=>n ~:.i~'°"''`~'':'Ci~ ',~'~W7;.1t E'':m:+.-.. ,';µta'az•'.,. ",::vM1;>:v.:s Y~t~=`~:~
Other - ~..1:0;'f`2'l;':.,:t,• ,5;~~S;a~~~,;~~ui x~tr,;:.
u,~. z,~ :~.:iJ^ a3'•.n'l~:,y.+,~r= "~4 „'xna°,°.,~;'.~"' s~>Si.«t ,~,r's:'s..='° ~`st"~t,~f.<F~".T „fw~'.
~£Y. ;c9~.,4r"{>,'s' ^i~~' 'i"s^.1~~4::;: .,A9 }5's"~?`>~_,;,- ::fr :*e7'=~;
;q.;.- ,_.'t, •tiw:Jr`. -.?-^k"":iCy~•'Y~.#WZ. ?r?Ax:,~te i:
Total 2:210
: ;>;U ,•,y."Ec st<E '.1f6 ~;3: :d. ~'t i`.~:': ~'(tf"i °x~i~ {i9',ar i3 .~'~`n:,''I.,''i?i4 ;i.•.'•;.::.:P,,y~ _,t$.:
~"'~rv:'~i5,r-'t'^: ,*t'g, L`;., surM",'*j~...~t.~:,le~ ..`y~P Fa;•z.;r~', i,°.>~t 3y: E~.i:':.
OUT OF TOWN
April April April
1999 2000 %
Collections Collections Change
~~55 :s~`.%%s;X'' +:.~'t,».."?~... :tz't?~"'i ;'is:•t<~''r-4;:~~ o, ,s,,:~-.:,-:
Retail 5267
~ Y"`:`6„~•.', ,'Ti: i. :.~G:. kry\':~i'FL~~' J~ •~,3:{ <t;
'S ~•rt ~ y~yp'.\: ~~,1~~„„3,s; f',. ^f.9: ;ji:~~
e:S - :`fl..~ „:.F;,ti3,~" r~t lt'''1:.;:.f"YY.N:,i.: ,;iy. ,3 y:5 iy.3ss~;.:' ~3%'E~•.
:~>c ~7 ;:.p~~t~;H ~N:;r;.~_~ :z:•
Lodging
.n%~ y;."?~"i g,. ",.'z'f.ii~il,_.~~:.:'.~;,,t.':;" ac {r.<-'';. :~";.t a":,.t";,•'...~.
'E'.~n'`'a
.'.••a a,:,,:•-z: r`k M'h°.','
•s 5. 'k'' 3. 6:, w;l.. J;.f'.s: z"'°; s.;e-r3, ::4. hy.
~I~,-,i°r,'^d dsu:•e -•`[:"v:y;.l~-:;'4'~t .be h,
4+•riC.'c`..,pi< ry1'+i4`^k,': ",t.'?
Food &
_,4.'';'; b.' 'i, w.k'id.• :x.3.1 "',)1`!mv'``ka~:. i., a- "';`9:.. St..L', :c-
GE.
Beverage
^,tJ'a'.ia^•:t~ T.eK,"`--~'`'s';f•°,trc'-s :;'.:.i~4"~. N`~ir'svy; 6w ".~"-.~trra'~,'r',
L.~N',F.bT.q,,••C f-C.?:;`3.,°:w ,.t~C, LTZ.'s '^.~`n.f4,,: ~t.A y5t=~", .c ",•4'4 _ i"`:y `x
l,7br;3>fr$, " r.•;'°',,:9BY . ?-a.;
s.F'w, %".y ~:;'A~='"g.`' :z\,'••U!''qy' ' h 1•• Jy.„t, s s >r.,9 .r
Other
~E,. ~JuJ,:`;.t ~J'l,.a=Ly'f r:„.~:: ~:.e.:l:~d£:~q~i%j a`"' ,,g i,,.,,+: 9•'<~~.~i=:'
m•1~'~F,'' iy:, >,:~r~"": z{t; _ kti-`°.y;,;;.`'N,~'c,`,, .;e„3. ~~r. et:;~,., ~.y~
...3" :'-1.,^1r o-I ":t,' : •:l~;S~':i.A"E'rr;' ;a~;w c''`;.E ,4'jar~~;;"°9~~1,'~'•`:,~
~n1~.taW, pp-.,;«;"r: t , ~;3'':i.S y.,;K ~ in:' k'". ,,s.,t :•i 'i;_ _ <
-;,9<r ..'k''~!' ..9 s" ^;t:"°~p,=,:;~°i _:5 s«„•pr -,i9q?,_.;.,~a''~,: nq.i~y: 'st!Y£r<~P`„:~'"z,u,
'~';a!a %3~a::.c,?i`: .o tY,w n-3fz.F.,,'-v;;9 _:'vY: 'f u,j..y_,•;. ~'i:: v:
_ ~•-Y•.r AR.S.~i.>'t:~i'"~'Li.:~~,Ps .it.?;i''J':~.;:
:3:1: 6<'' =115
Total
Y'? •n".t'•'i°',~ E~ ~d. ~$":i,N'?'* ~l5., ^i~:,8~'~`< -<;~~d'tM.
APRIL 2000 SALES TAX
TOTAL
April April April
1999 2000 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 380,037 378,865 -0.3%
Lodging 240,208 206,965 -13.8%
Food &
Beverage 207,736 196,863 5.2%
Other 125,854 114,688 -8.9%
Total 953,835 897,381 -5.9%
RETAIL SUMMARY
APRIL APRIL APRIL
1999 2000 %
COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE
FOOD 84,434 93,438 10.7%
LIQUOR 15,185 15,717 3.5%
APPAREL 52,130 44,772 -14.1%
SPORT 136,504 142,659 4.5%
JEWELRY 14,135 15,645 10.7%
GIFT 11,458 10,774 -6.0%
GALLERY 3,401 6,650 95.5%
OTHER 62,544 49,210 -21.3%
HOME 246 0 -100.0%
OCCUPATION
TOTAL 380,037 378,865 -.31%
99100 SKI SEASON SALES TAX
VAIL VILLAGE
98/99 99/00 99/00
Ski Season Ski Season %
Collections Collections Change
=a?s zt's`;; •s:=tiF~Fu+" A'` -;•rN;, "Xt'', „ yr a <.r'' ;,c;z v 'o
g~,.,,,
~„^•r,> N"`d'°w.yt'::dr~js'Y~ `~t•:"`' "y'.`;~~-
-•l:~ .'."ff r'`~•,'S.3~z: a. '>!{',3 •y"`~mz { {b' "~'ib kr £ Z;'t'.
?~a ~`Y.~.:`,.
s' 3y~,g+.-~,.;x.4Y+,{r~.:,~::~,~.e:a~~;i~t;:'
= ..,fit'! -i - FYAT, ~`-~STCa y,,,°, ,s` w. £Sata-'
X92'1°Ofi7,;3~ YF~~875 3v~ }q 2 4°fo
Retail
e,?" ,A•V, .~,'-P45'% e..Y. •'~d~aci:F~,'>.+ st,, .a..,•"s''y:~:;:
e {x3d#J ,d„ ;tti i•: "i,'+'s?I`,f,V', ~E^ .'7 "~n'i,Jr,,{Cti~::-,.:f: b ."..'F°'p%~^'; ,•;-`1.,, 'i 'M'
n;7''r<s s„s'c'.' s °s` .5j"•,''t. •.F,Y,.,;.
~~'r";;~,,;; .-F{..,z~4
, y •~~I!'?~trr r»~k~~;ny~J'~%=4;s : ~ r~A" aak~,'.'~ Ks"~;,v`.~ .n,:.~; ~n;~ s.:~§i
~.'zi; ,~.f., - .y~..: rr•-;f= i,k d.. "a `„,''.'-,ear.,, i, 13''`:,`
T A>',.'Q' NO Lod in '74.6"4C;5s:£,<:u:,70;5,;18r:=r;:::;>x:24F1o
~w"Si,°,:: z.'"..". Sp.x;;=:~~~ ,^Y,•"'„"X''3~a:~-~ii'„ta:l5"y ¢,~i`-~,•'o,.:: 'i.',;t~f_: .r.a: ~.a''~~iy ~:t~::o-F.;~'F, j'+_.'
-=~a~:ia'<,Yy~z„„'11, „a ; .-~r`ir„~`~, %'s5 £~~;;3{~;y» °''i', ,zJ,,':'~,,„*,. ~,.kr,1~d5' p~q''.s'a .7'~ ' I.•re'r: ;4_~~'
- :',r..,sr.cr,, r, Fi,~~y~~t .':o-x.H-;, ,,,~rt:~~;,y:};" ~ :5~' `;p`. ~r,;;^~=.v?"ii;•:';:;Y<
"~'F dan ;`7Y .^y;•Lfi~^,4,a~,., -s xyry~~~' ...:A ;~~,i ,3.-'4i"'3':`',
n'(:':.l ;:i"J _K,::" '.'iM S e .b: ~',L'',:. xi: ;:t £ , :•,?;W~,,,F,.
Food &
ra 'ics"•.ri~jM"- "
r xh`3 ~ ,y
` ' 346 , ~ ;'r: 71;5
;Beverage 7<°l0
v'^+','-s:,rit:;~44 „e:, ;~44 „e:, ":ar:: •A
.,.k. ?..'~~aL.~, ,...S:N ?gC; '.::;y~•~,rot.t"r. ,:o','~"`.J`,.~r,•,~ ' '~"fl~a:;!r>b~;arip~~„.":~~';+~. '`"!~.'4'l; ,
r~ _:`k^"~E.~: .%'::~y~"' ~~ji~zY~i'3: ^~'W:` Y-: .'''ay~f"i~~GS~aa ~~z¢• ~'.`,~~_;ti~"~y.~,^;,'. y~~: [.<•.'n.;;C';~`~. N''IS : i
,s.rfi:'t
Other
y.r..,i,&{ ,rc
.~_;x:'~sy=v„ ~'';~v:; ,~1>r;,'Y=. ,d,,° i.. ;,~'~~:~;'"G~,•t, aW~;'',; •~c?'t,, «'rlYa.k . '
F.yn-!i
'szil:.~t+::'d'w,$i';-{;,
#'i'' ten,, %^•i", ,k=; °'r r•7 .'.`«l;' ~r 0.'4',•,.'..u"~s.
s"-qk, -a>a,.;}•`:'a
,..r '`"a-..i'•';~i'~_r'>
,:If;:,p ;i'a-}wG.-
iF`%y'ai4_L;;.:£., •,'i"W ~~:`1~, t y`;a,'~ :;r~ t.-iY'i§y'y:Y.
ry'. k ^t^1'G~ bjb
Total 5'075"881 `08 7:4 o-^„r x,'
d.A.~$,'J,pxSn'~'F.s,}• i;M;sa.'M'?^N:?~ ' ,.•,CfI,,:Y~.
w<; s >;;~i, s;=Y ,:„rb1A;^^i*;i~ ;i,~~ix~s'`;;+-,::,:'~=-.£=;'• , ~''rt,,",
<W`~~~"•i z A`'~','i;4".~':, r, 5x'ibw' .:F;~,. :,;f4 S-,. ,sn;:r ; L: ~'i•':,~~
y£• ~,FV~N. .'f''1.., •:.Se.:.. ~.;T,:., r. :li:,.ft:y~3. :~*':r ;
LIONSHEAD
98/99 99/00 99/00
Ski Season Ski Season %
Collections Collections Change
'a '.A{i"'',tYi4~rc@ t-a•: a '^T"~y` ."F''.Aa
MT c :~r',~.:1 Ld$ ,-o= x-;•_:xa,µ.,t?„~ K~ t k + § eu~
`74' 31:: 7=-429, 0
Retail
r~,xr' ,£.i ,,°,'~:e, y~~ ~~,ja: /~Yq"~~ "..~.LI a°'jY~'~ 's r,^•~,-':~~`;,2a•,,'.f~siy T.'~~, ~p
"~t..,.''~trg';•:~~~r •!,a. ~i~c~4;.N„pr;..~:s•^k.r%~%;Zi,;n~~:: .:wd;C:" i,~.-a; -„~3.•.,.:,:.y,.-;ir:'.
"i~~~~'"x~:; g;~..a', hc• _'r;'n•!..,,c~i':'fey„nb:;~'-.';'~'~w:;"•~:•,w;~:0,''~a
z,Jr~." ri.~L~'"~.Ys?5` '~!rs'.w,^., .arm ~.v',; r.;«, gar'. F",,,,rr£,<<"~i:ti,.
,>.4
.942,369."'k",
Lod9in =E.9fi2`8:$
g I', t=~~
zlr g,A,.w,"§;~7,~,~a:sw ,<~;:'r„~;is. ,pv4~:: 3.,7stin~ ~M ~ g~,~'r~~~~r..,:'h; ~•z' -,Y.;::',;
~.q
rie%f':' a, :;;4 '+S •a>:rr .',"a"-.,•r:.:' ~4~ z ,'',':.~'.£3s`'.arT _ s.r;
,.I:z':r
s^n:.:
a~~wer'=rY'K.risf~e
qq~~ F4,;~,y~ Y~xy- ~ Hafgi ~..^.i, .:,~i`•„: " L _ _ ",.,~,.-s~ ~
Food
`"'qe sx~:% c` ,fh y; >%,r' 8.~7='~•'s { 3y' ~x,.:s« `tH.;f%' ,N3'-,
, £ a r•...r.,'; ~ ~~'r.a.,,~"*_; 'y Rte?'". K
g 368: ~9'"' ~~v~:
Bevera a
•it;xwf +':'+l~dacnt~ - ?aT`;,,,,;>,~, k,,~e" q~.~, ~ 3N'.r,,:~;~;;,=r ,.r u:s'6~;„'',,•,; y :u',~'%;e»z
s.,xi''s~v~~ z';:s"" ~c~~::'~ _'"~;;g~,'s~,' rte" wa•~~~~:<'~','~~,~~a'~m`?~k;~i.'fr=~r',-.;'
X,'1,
.'..,;:s°..
To~
~39'82422,r af'
Other
~~`~°'~:i~'.~:l~' , A:i t•`C~¢r'•NdH~i~.,^ a'fF~ii~!'4is`;":~', ,""~,~r.-~ ,.:i
.$~i"ii.:.;a:'a~,.a~;:$.,:.~'i~'s~w;§.`a.~ :-ip"vii °<ss.:;`.:;~ c•!,i,,,'xy:., -':K;;^
~~•y,,... ~'NSa,,~t" i.R ;:c':: ,',.F,' ':~',:if :~~,i.., : :':.'S'siR"3, S't'~:~i .'3 fn".b_ir ,a:~~.:',`':
;A;ii,,.i«
r",
.,^Z,~y52:5a= X2`0:=4:38,=.~,;n=:=49°l0
Total
t <<..rv,;'°"i'!' ;~.,'`yi'%~.,;ss,°i,:e.^c,•;;"~:_",qi ~z•''S`.:•r,.;:~"".,~rr r~',:~,..~,s.,,"
' I:ivK a~'"" • 'AwN .£e.~:'::Ctt' _ arc v ' ~ i+': a Y.,~O,~~~,~'
99100 SKI SEASON SALES TAX
CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAILISANDSTONEIWEST "IL
98/99 99/00 99/00
Ski Season Ski Season %
Collections Collections Change
t: Fq.. 5bw _ ~~„Y,:M:.:."•SL•C:L; "Ah'~~k. ":,.T.k 3:jS[, ~q~~~!'d~«7':i ^'%^.~:~3` ~3%s'•:
`w~~':u `;'.`$~.rv wrN~q',F.: T• f'f1,i„Y~?e3,.• `A;'i, ~a',•~.'%• .::f~.s!i `_LM;.>^;•. aJ,; :::'YM n
y'e y.,s'~ 1 ;u-j;'z-< ?:4°,+.~•~ ~~2 L.4~;' d ~ ~•9.1:,k'. Rx
.~i" i-•451•.' 3S'''.' ~wL`•"
-;daa '`~J--3 tli -~•,,"vri~°~+.`"v frsf„+N''' .t-fi
',hu„~w. ;'3's=,r3a`'~;'•;a 3:~7;"Yf,•~">"" 4. 'C,y- 'iwY2';.>N >.<'t~~y;
•,'•;.•;.~:•,'a''.sx~v..'Fr<~~y.,;:~,;'f~;,~~;.;ix;s~;*?,;µ*:,~i~;<`:'' ~'~a~;"y".'=i:~:;~:;~-:a;'~:s,.. ,;.t":~~~:.:
;:&i•„ e:3af -Ye: ~,ar,;',!.@",° ,3• :r„,w;y'~ss s ,«"'s'a;;~ 90 AM
Retail 3?-`:: - 029~::;:
'.w;(S~• ,l~ < w".jy,,it" ,n~,.>t r`j'"'ij';;? 'Yfq:•_.^ f.id §.1s =rr
jr,;'..~ iy 4~nf; '1§.°v~';. i%i- ~'W:i~ ..5. -.I Q'..F „°:r,•/'; J`y4 Fi..
~q(n ~'ti ..sr a~,.;,.: ~tt'~;-.:_`' e~•,P~
Lodging 57g.. 79,3'73G~u= ,.r , x ,
'-7x{,F~pi?'I'j•,`•: ~ :"*i_,y .t7rp"
t 2' a s.~« w =k-g s •"'g d€4 ''*°g' x: }ry
Food &
k: yF:;,~6t~g `~~na ~,3j= 'aa ti,-;.. ,,'„<s'•.,R"~-z"°"~df
Beverage =.-•i;?.; c '.~P'a;€,s,+~.'Yx •mk;?:.~a r:
;2fi2'4'14: .r= ; .:27GS33:;,
y,.ir~ x; l_~},1~~';N~..'a,,„~j~;, <1g•i~ r.~:'~,~,.'ha "7:;, ~•:.w ~ ~=~.r,~ #a `a- ~>•lz's°
"~¢3'«"~:. ~f. `ri 'sloe ";!"?j:."Y]•;`,'y:a „~~~i'v ~ii~ y~e; k..e w•; ~N.~^•,,4F%,:J ..fr,~u;~-a% ,,;ay~•^".,'~i~~?'.::,;, `:~~t~r,,
x{,„-.,jP41A": >a()S~."i•.:: x,Yy>§,r Y' <s~'-.t ',°,L .i-ZP•i: <<`yv,`.:; -°fKr1 v,;~
<,U,,;T.:.a,• '..ti-x" ""a~::v.=.i`.'r.•3,`'" 'zi'.,;s."r;;' ~'a~S.'-',n-'!~ 0>J
~i~>~; :,x :~'nei^i .w''a`,;,,~~ «'7'I~~ '1,v'~?`,r"•:`F~r:;.~`',,;r%=~7~~~j'1~{
Other 02$,,'•:-,:
~;„i~e'•,~':~~~'. .'~~„K{~~ tip" xt«'{k,r.' ..<h~' L~ =r"=: ''r "'"e:<c
Y.F .~3 ,fnn~.'ro,. L ,.cud;Si4. ~ Pye c• ry
~3"=<f„ v~ava:r,=«, .y,~'>^ 'aka ~,vds .,~,~i:~dC'-:"?»,..•{`4,>`S~~',s~,:~.•t;!5~a~ '''"''':'<~'d-~-s~~v~i`t,''2"?~°^a
o°~,.r€£,~s"'~'nx•~. t(. =:k,7''~.;-~?''•u,,'«y d'S,. =.a.: ;b=,;~~,.;--<; ~q r',,~n.~~'e.~:.v n{~e,~;;,a~' er" >4.
+:`Az3-:per ~ °a:? ._:Rb'~:.:~>F.~:~,.es:~:.., '•~a'.4 ,Sar,.T~"'d;,~i.,-~'ak.w bb's,~<'.,*.
z-Nac>< ,.R;;: <.*~j~d":;~+~..ia~ a::zr ~,::d?'t. :~;"::i~,y _F>~yry ...M~%n~~-:im~'., z~fi.~:
j" ~:q `':~z :~:a r" '%''°Y6~'. ~ris~: •a;a: ~~~,r?3,~~'~{,d. »,.~<,.,r?y°~~~.',:~:~~;::>.a
r?'~~: .yY;•;n ';-;=?.."t<;~p2,'~: t~':;,°r.e~`•~. /.uih~;:M~~iS<::.._x.;'w'b `f,a`-,..a ajtl~P ^.<',~r,k`~~+,.:~, r`:i',~:"~ s. ;:~`_'n.^' 5:. +'„=`C"a'w i ~`:'''"?-'+:•:p. %~j'.w'w,~:^.:~.?p?rc';,'~r.:''.?:' #=~^A
=4 0,~
.r..wz,;a`,.;`~' r :^RSa ~.:~y,'%?'{*-'`;x' r•gFw~~
Total
_;~:srv,a;',.s;''ii'.:,
~r ~.j. r~, ~!,r, ~;3a:riiCn„_s3.. F'~/ ~`rT<~in'a4R ,~":;SA~'"`. A ~"}~k.% 1rv'.~5',i.,~•r..`':°„ ..~~"~s;S "..r„`,<'.~...
,,'es,:=as,%~ ',~";:i^'..,;FV~,. »~~ai'-",,t.gcs•:"~... ,_:1s .x...,, i..., -~j ~'.:'r,,
OUT OF TOWN
98/99 99/00 99/00
Ski Season Ski Season %
Collections Collections Change
mar"..- ap;•~;r - _ ,;,,s--"~pr~~~g;~ ~oF^~;~::?~z',#a''S.?-~~~n5~_-_~'~~,~`P A`,~~,.
? aY3 ~,9 Y'(.o §,1 » 'V y,ffS' G y alx .Y•
v M{{' 7'>~ :I,.t,.~'uu a'Jf'~3< sj••°3 E.,:
leg,
13".''~ :g44',<'z.; s. 75-1,v°
Retail , -
_ :djK ft,- ,n<: r, :~,,;•r'a• ~5, 6,`-*` ' s .rJ ~'M --~;,{1„`a.-;;:} ; < ,a,.~,::.. ~0 3z.r.:':.
~i,,,k'?M1i:„6M•z,,.. :,!.igo' ~ - ~i .,•F;.T't„",°f?5~+,`,y. >•Ft~ ~~~~Y,F~3r3'o-i 't:- at~~~~r~~v:
s .t: %':}::ic 15; J,= v :,i:Y,--i r YG a ;.i.:
••i'=1'~.`'
iy"-'-` its°'A,fx•'rS'.u'.rµ nFi<c ° .at~':a*sr'
w{i- &:<!5;;~.k~"x:,..a..r':."~jy,.ry,? { •.a::~s~~s,..,
~a vse>~,A
->•.s~. ~*S~~;r=:~.'. ~r r~i ?t,„r~,.S:z';;~"= t_n E'"• ~,~r; ,,.vv ,,,V;
:r-;
R" 327 2
;.;=<K r:,,:..,q,Y~,,
E =:,ds..,r>t =3t~ a
Lodging
;;;ye "Ss~.s,-Z;a~F4~. "s;'~,py ~~-~•'~,~~~,fi•..w`" ,F M;;~: *,a1.•~~~.:~ 's.«~,,,~~: fit=
qjl~>i£~sk r~1Cr -3f. "z" -_5.(." 42x,:•,„.w:f!
:1='z.w..~,-: ••~T.°aA 't,. z's,' z ,J:' y~';~r,-•fr; _?S~•~F,s.Y".:;,' .,•\f~
i?
.a-''as;, 4•v` ,F~ l ' ,a:F $:a x °.r:' ;;v3'rw"°'•-_`_ a Yr, ;~;~F =R' --,A'
Food &
Sr><aa, a' ~F - ~y ~y3F,t=si6 4.F~~'r:r :`g rs ".v':.,': ~Y; • :w~''~u rswF3 R/! <'~:~;•.~s~
Beverage
~~,f#~ :Y~•.~:~-:5•~>r' •.a~; rv::,~,:,.,.~~' '~~:G),:~,q-F~.:;~;;:.
::s`,a,'s;,c~•~.-'-;,,z•'1. ~xi °'~9::'£s'i '.a; ,:-4.: a'i ,..ss' :<}°`:~.A~r`~f~;~::.
:~~.~'.^-<•.rSY~: L..•:;t,iy~..c }:4..;.«:{:~}»'A`>» -tiLe ..n. ~j,j2li<r•.~a' <...s,.z.~~'~ ,
yy S', y,,, ns.. -~„;a {M S;jpF. d •c.:: n",-v;~'
,;yt
.,~k..::R`",y`e L'.r3,',';,=,°:.°irJ-,,•`ky' Y.'"< ,'M>a
~Fi
:';~c~'~-,', ..~_a>.~~~•- •~?rdz7x<,rten,>a,~e¢rzz.^-.c:~F».~tr,, [$•,73°. c~~,.;s,'~{1ns;_"' iE4. u, b~k•a:~~~~;
Other .8`4517.4
~.1s`7..-r.. ~.M~.;y ;>~g~y>~'•v~~ks~~e;• ".~;'~µf-, ~:~,r. ~;~a,.$.
~~~'6* -?"g s;r' _ p c~~';:K:::'b'%`sx?`~,':':`y~.~s"y`,+'s~>•~E~~'fr -v'~ 4a > s-p9 .gs
" ^.~,..r3~~~<.'~« 3a„'~ '~••',.:r>~• ~i•.a:, ~':.~a; ..,°r'+`, `Yi',T~:,°:.;~x a.{;.»..,,, _ t -a tom,:
~:y a7: e•» ~,r'•h`=-"'~~t=:{=k nv `f,3•y'~: `.:t',{ n'y~>i. :s ~e {."xar; r~Mx
,~~>-'<=,t =„g~,~-; n. (~,3 ,a<L~'I`.,'.'<~N:'_"~a3,- $~t'C``4, 9;^.,,,,, ',"-~'`p'ak ?'~'r!e•°.•
•i"•'~U,(~?.k.~~'--~+;i`V,~b`E4• ~'4S,,vis~,~.r.AV„ T '"Y.^s't ~ ~~~"n~,3'~ji:~'µL;i<.ki"<>E~•.: w,?:~i:,,»%~°~sj"'F: b•"'d%~r:
~1;,tv,.w.r.4a.,,'~§;~ o=° •.~'t';z-^, ri.-;aj&~!:',z`:.bj'„•~'~~-'"~,d' `~'a:%,">,iE~,;'e;;n?~5d-~,'o
'~i•i>.' .,,4,v, r.-`-' :~;~:~;...'~r..,T~,'~'~',,~:. °:~f,.,.,a'~ ~,''&;fry.`^g~'.:../;.rgy~J: c„ i•.
._:T>f..x.,ay :'.~+`,~s.':,r, .,y,>xrw~:y,,; <.a `sg:.• `
Total . ,qtr,' y:rt'z•_.r^.y`,w,;,?i~"r,Y,'l:'- rr~tyi;,: ,..;:`'r :.,,s
a-`„°'~ . , <s' .s ry~q„~. . ,a sg <';'.~t, ~'g •,.md`*.,e' '°~ti:~:: v.~ ~ .,,r.:> • ...`i: r<y'•.:
'1 <'•f' '1 ~~,~t:u~'~_~~~ ~"~=5' r ''Y°^'~a'3<,:~ik+~• ..Y i•Dd'''-,,,;z'„k, ym^E'~t"n,'j Yo~i•~r.:~6y.~.
.:f [?;~{seFS,E>n :mx 1"e," ?r ~ ~~(a"~ `sr. r,', •z5'~" s., ;.C"
is~;aixti=y.~•.::5~?,.~':r,"F,~:v3 ~:a9..~:~%".~~'art}~'~~.'aN~..;?.,:,''~"~''~:~~~;~~~~'~2~'"`~~I."~aa•~`:'.:;':C."-~.:. ,<•„_2, r. <'i'_::~x...5".~r~,..:,.
99100 SKI SEASON SALES TAX
TOTAL
98/99 99/00 99/00
Ski Season Ski Season %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 3,816,607 3,816,240 0.0%
Lodging 3,532,272 3,446,060 -2.4%
Food &
Beverage 2,026,108 2,078,543 2.6%
Other 815,408 794,846 2.5%0:
Total 10,190,395 10,135,689 -0.5%
RETAIL SUMMARY
98/99 99/00 99/00
SKI SEASON SKI SEASON %
COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE
FOOD 727,444 743,614 2.2%
LIQUOR 146,164 146,555 .3%
APPAREL 541,232 499,544 -7.7%
SPORT 1,564,218 1,565,235 .1%
JEWELRY 165,088 179,829 8.9%
GIFT 121,116 112,295 -7.3%
GALLERY 32,058 32,953 2.8%
OTHER 514,845 525,096 2.0%
HOME 4,442 11,119. 150.3%
OCCUPATION
TOTAL 3,816,607 3,816,240 -.01%
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
19 ,
i
Memo
To: Vail Town Council
From: Mike Rose
Date: June 23, 2000
Re: Rider conduct documents
I have included the changes you requested. If I don't hear from you by June 27, 2000, I will proceed with
the program for the July 4`h holiday. I can be reached at 479-2349 or 390-4679 (cell).
Thanks
r
NOTICE TO TOWN OF VAIL PASSENGERS
It is the goal of the Town of Vail to provide a secure and comfortable environment for all
passengers. To achieve this goal, your cooperation is requested.
Passengers are encouraged to immediately report any disturbance, unwanted advances by
other passengers, or problems involving safety, welfare and comfort, to the Driver. The
Driver will take the appropriate action to remedy the problem.
Anyone creating a disturbance will be removed from the bus by Law Enforcement
Officials and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Types of behavior prohibited by
local Disorderly Conduct provisions, and not allowed on Town of Vail buses, are as
follows:
1. Profane, obscene, or offensive language directed at, or in the presence of another
person, which tends to be an immediate breach of the peace; or
2. Abusive, threatening, or obviously offensive behavior that tends to be an immediate
breach of the peace; or
3. Disturbing the peace of others by violent, tumultuous, or offensive conduct, or by loud
or unusual noises; or
4. Threats, quarrels, challenges to fight, or fights with another person; or
5. Interfering with free and unobstructed use of a public place by any person or persons.
Those creating a public nuisance or disturbance may also be prosecuted under Colorado
State statues related to Hindering and Endangering Public Transportation, which may
be classified as a felony.
Town of Vail personnel may monitor the boarding of buses. If you experience a problem
during your trip related to any of the issues discussed above, please notify the Driver
immediately. The Driver is in constant contact with Town of Vail Supervisors and La'w
Enforcement Officers, who are available to provide assistance, if necessary.
Thank you for your cooperation in helping to create a safe and comfortable environment
for all Town of Vail passengers. Please let us know if there is anything else that we can
do to make your traveling experience more enjoyable by calling the Town of Vail at 479-
2178.
r
The Town of Vail is delighted to provide free bus service.
Causing a disturbance on this bus may be considered
hindering the operation of a public conveyance or endangering
public transportation, punishable by up to a $750,000 fine and
up to 16 years in prison. All violators will be prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law. All infractions will be reported to the
police.
State of Colorado 18-9-118, 18-9-114 CRS
Town of Vail Code sections 6-30-2, 6-30-4, 6-30-3
Causar un disturbio en este autobus puede considerarse como
un impedimento al funcionamiento de un vehiculo publico o
como un acto que pone en peligro el transporte publico, to cual
es castigable por una multa de hasta $750,000 y con una
condena de hasta 16 anos de prision. Todo transgressor sera
procesado hasta el limite de la ley, y todas las infracciones
seran denunciadas ante la policia.
State of Colorado 18-9-118. 18-9-114, CRS
Town of Vail Code sections 6-30-2, 6-30-4, 6-30-3
CRIME STOPPERS 1-800-962-8477
Bozas De Crimen-Se Hable Espanol 328-8488
COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP
TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOWUP
2000 _
05/25/00 PLANTERS IN FRONT OF BOB: Work w/Crossroads management to replace this FOLLOW UP: Jim Morter has applied for a permit to proceed.
CROSSROADS eyesore.
Rod Slifer
06/06/00 - TAGGING KEG SALES JOE RUSSELL: What has happened to the issue of tagging Bill Hoffman with the Eagle County Sheriffs Dept. is responsible for
keg sales to control under age drinking? Also, there is distributing the tags to various liquor stores in Eagle County. The Victim's
Kevin Foley community interest in creating stiffer fines or stronger Impact group supports this program by purchasing the tags for the program.
enforcement regarding fake ID's. What can we do to This is a VOLUNTARY program. There are three Town of Vail liquor stores
respond to this need? in the program at this time; West Vail Liquor Mart, Alpine Wine & Spirits and
East Vail Liquors.
He has given out approx. 500-750 tags per year to the TOV retail liquor
stores. He is in the process of ordering 2,000 more tags and will be
contacting all the retail liquor stores in Eagle County again.
He believes this program is working well. He stated because the person
who picks up the keg has to show an ID and sign that the keg is not for
consumption by persons under 21, this is a good deterrent. He said we are
part of a very small group within Colorado that does tagging of kegs (he
believes there are only 6-10 other municipalities that do this).
He believes that people who do not wish to sign the tags on kegs go to
Glenwood Springs to get kegs.
06/06/00 - ANIMAL CONTROL GREG M: It appears that the County is using a heavy hand Deb Annibali will compute statistics. When the study is complete, a time will
on animal control issues. Other constituents want more be scheduled for discussion at a Council Work Session on
Kevin Foley/Chuck Ogilby enforcement. Schedule a Council discussion on this issue. Rusty Williams from the county will attend. _
06/06/00 - GRAFFITI GREG H: There is graffiti under the Twin Bridges in East Vail CDOT has been contacted as the bridges are out of the town and belong to
that needs to be removed. CDOT. We are also contacting Eagle county and whether the use of
Kevin Foley inmates can be used.
06/06/00 - TRASH CANS AT BUS STOPS LARRY P.: Could we place small trashcans at the bus stops All of our bus shelters have trashcans. We will look into if additional cans
along the pedestrian paths (that don't already have garbage can be placed at bus stops. The bus stops usually have less rider ship and
Diana Donovan, cans)? Diana has offered to dump a small one by her house are in locations where we have limited public property. Coordination with the
if installed. adjacent property owners will be needed along with are we able to serve the
additional cans in a timely manner.
06/06/00 - BALD MOUNTAIN BOB: Write a letter to the organizers to thank them for
June 22, 2000, Page 1
NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY creating such a lovely garden.
Diana Donovan
06/06/00 - ENTRY/GATEWAY FEATURE GREG H.: Lets create an entry/gateway feature on private Does Council want to make this a priority and fund it? It is currently an
land - and do it soon! Is this part of the way-finding unfunded project.
Diana Donovan discussion?
06/13/00 - STAIRS AT THE CHART HOUSE GREG H.: The stairs and railings at the Chart House are We are coordinating all of our maintenance work to be completed within the
coming apart. villages to be completed before the fourth of July. This may lapse over to
Kevin Foley right after the fourth but will be taken care of this summer.
- LIONSHEAD SKIER BRIDGE GREG H.: The Lionshead Skier Bridge needs work. We anticipate this will be replaced as a part of the redevelopment process.
=ey
06/13/00 Speed Bumps PAM B./BETH S.: Schedule discussion regarding speed Once the model traffic Code is in place we can Schedule this item to then
bumps at a future council meeting. discuss the issues with a Traffic Calming solutions. There are plenty of
Greg Moffet examples out there from other communities for examples to implement a
program but policies must be in place prior to installation.
06/13/00 -1-70 NOISE TOM M./GREG M.: There should be a penalty for noise 1-70 is a major issue and should be a part of Council's overall strategic
violations. direction.
Greg Moffet
06/13/00 - LETTER TO MERCHANTS PAM B.: Does the Council need to revisit this item to Staff is simply verifying outdoor displays are on private property.
REGARDING OUTDOOR DISPLAYS address the merchants concerns?
Sybill Navas
06/13/00 - SEWER PIPE AT THE GREG H.: What can be done with the appearance of the The original sewer service for Ford Park was considered a seasonal use It
AMPHITHEATER sewer pipe at the amphitheater? has now become a year round use since VRD moved their offices into the
Tennis Center. This last winter it froze. This bridge is scheduled for
Diana Donovan replacement this fall. We will either reconnect if the work is minor to do or
clean it up in place. This work is scheduled to take place before the fourth.
06/13/00 - MANOR VAIL BRIDGE END GREG H.: Are the end railings at Manor Vail dangerous? Once the final landscaping is in place this should be addressed.
RAILINGS
Diana Donovan
06/13/00 - EAST MEADOW DRIVE POT- GREG H.: What is being done to fix the potholes at East These were fixed this week.
HOLES Meadow Drive?
Diana Donovan
June 22, 2000, Page 2
06/13100 - NEWSPAPER BOXES GREG H.: Reconsider types of Newspaper boxes at certain This design went through the DRB and newspaper distributors review along
locations. with Council review and sat at Comm Dev for Two months. All of the boxes
Diana Donovan are completed and the Town has spent in excess of $50,000.
If the design needs to be changed it could if you so desire.
06/13/00 - WATERING THE SPACE GREG H.: Can additional irrigation be installed in this area to We have a drip line over there now and it can be expanded to meet some of
BETWEEN THE ROUNDABOUT AND THE help the trees grow? the demand. Spray irrigation if we have the capacity, which we will check
PARKING STRUCTURE. on, would also accelerate grass and weed growth which causes additional
maintenance costs.
Diana Donovan
06/13/00 - THE FISH OBSERVATORY Todd 0.: Explore the idea of having the fish observatory at
the expanded Ford Park Alpine Garden location.
Chuck Ogilby
06/13/00 - TRASH CANS AT HAAGEN- GREG H.: Recommended that the trashcans be moved off We are working with Haagan Dazs on getting this resolved. Some have
DAZS the sidewalk. been moved.
Diana Donovan
06/13/00 - NOISE ORDINANCE GREG M./TOM M.: Should Council revisit the noise Ludwig will address this with the Council at the June 20, meeting.
ordinance?
Ludwig Kurz
06/13/00 ILLEGAL BUILDING ACTIVITY TOM M./Russ F.: Staff bring amendment the zoning code to This should be reviewed as a part of Council's critical strategies.
bring properties into compliance.
Chuck Ogilby
06/13100 - WORK VISAS FOR OTHER JOHN P.: Can the Town help businesses get work visas. No. Each visa type requires proving criteria which is individual business
BUSINESSES specific.
Diana Donovan
06/13/00 MAIN VAIL ROUNDABOUT We have scheduled to have it removed. We are working on finding a
CENTER TREE suitable replacement and will bring a cost of this once we have it. It would
most likely be best to move in a replacement in the fall to insure the
greatest success level.
June 22, 2000, Page 3