HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-07-18 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session
!TAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, July 18, 2000
7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to
determine at what time Council will consider an item.
1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. (5 mins.)
2. CONSENT AGENDA. (5 mins.)
A. First reading of Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2000; an
Ordinance 12-10, Vail Town Code; with specific regard to Vail's
commercial core area parking maps; and setting forth details
in regard thereto.
3. 1 n Reading of Ordinance No. 16, Series 2000 - Cable Franchise Agreement.
Bob McLaurin (30 mins.)
Tom Moorhead
Fred Lutz ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with modifications
or deny Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2000 on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONAL: The Town of Vail entered into a Cable
Television Franchise Agreement with TCI on January 5, 1995. That
Agreement provided that TCI rebuild the existing cable system within thirty-
six months of the effective date on the Agreement. The rebuild, pursuant
to the Franchise Agreement, required utilization of a "fiber optics to the
service area" design in which optical fiber delivers signals from the central
hub to nodes serving approximately 500 to 1,000 residences. The nodes
interface the optical fiber with coaxial cables which distribute signals to cable
subscribers and also serves as input-output points for connection to public
buildings and businesses.
Due to new technology in the area of digital compression the system has
been capable of being built in a manner that the subscriber receives the
same benefit of expanded services and quality of service without utilizing the
amount of fiber optics contemplated in the Agreement.
The system build-out has continued through lengthy review of the Franchise
Agreement and the Town of Vail's cable television system. The Town has
utilized the services of Enhanced Video, Voice and Data Systems Inc. as a
consultant to assure that the Town of Vail is receiving the full benefit of the
quality of services negotiated in the original Franchise Agreement. The
attached Amendment, extensive negotiations, and a close working
relationship with the cable operator has resulted in a system capable of
performing and offering advantages to subscribers that were not originally
contemplated.
Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2000, on first
reading.
4. First reading of Ordinance No. 17, Series of 2000, an ordinance removing
George Ruther the requirement for Planning and Environmental Commission
representation on the Design Review Board. (15 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Approve, approve with modifications or deny Ordinance No. 17, Series of
2000, on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
Chapter 4, Design Review Board, of the Municipal Code, states that "The
design review board shall be composed of five (5) members. Four (4)
members shall be residents of the Town, appointed by the Town Council,
and the fifth member shall be a member of the Planning and
Environmental Commission of the Town."
RECOMMENDATION:
The PEC, upon motion (7-0), has recommended that the Town Council
consider making changes to the code removing the requirement for PEC
representation on the DRB. The reason given for the motion was that the
amount of time necessary to attend both the PEC meetings and the DRB
meetings was excessive and difficult for working professionals to attend
and was redundant give the role of the staff.
Staff believes it is beneficial for Town Boards to have overlapping
membership, so that each Board understands the interrelationship of the
Boards and Commissions. Staff believes that such a system would be
beneficial also for the Town Council to have voting members present at
the PEC and DRB meetings for this reason. However, we understand the
impacts of having volunteers in our community committing significant
blocks of time to board meetings. The sizeable time commitments
necessary for these Boards negatively impacts our ability to fill empty
positions with qualified residents.
Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 17, Series of 2000, on first
reading.
5. 1' Reading of Ordinance No. 18, Series 2000 - Vail Heights Buy Down Unit.
Nina Timm (15 mins.)
Tom Moorhead
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Town of Vail pursuant to it's Buy-
Down program purchased the unit located at 2059 Chamonix Lane Unit No.
6, Vail, Colorado on June 2, 2000. The purchase price was $129,000. The
Town has conducted a lottery and has identified potential purchasers to
purchase the unit at a deed-restricted price of $115,000. There has been
a possibility of a special assessment incurring prior to the resale of the unit.
Though we believed that the assessment would occur in July it has not
happened yet. The purchasers are prepared to close on the unit immediately
upon the two readings of the ordinance. This ordinance is being presented
to meet the charter requirement of Section 4.8 which specifies that the sale
of any real property is required to be approved by ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance authorizing the sale of unit no.
6, Vail Heights Condos.
6. Rotary International Children's Opportunity Grant - Pediatric Health Care
Carolyn Cage Proclamation. (10 mins.)
Carol Hymers
7. Hub Site. (15 mins)
Russell Forrest
8. TOV Community Survey Results
Suzanne Silverthorn
Chris Cares Action Requested of Council:
Listen to the presentation of the survey findings and ask for clarification,
where needed. (45 mins.)
Background Rationale:
The Town of Vail conducted its traditional community survey during the
first two weeks in April this year. A new feature of the survey was the
addition of multiple formats: on the Internet, by mail and by phone. The
results were tabulated by RRC Associates, a Boulder-based planning and
market research firm. This marks the 13th consecutive year in which the
town has used a citizen survey to track its performance in a variety of
areas and to identify community priorities and concerns.
9. Vail Community Chamber Web-site Presentation. (20 mins.)
Joe Staufer
10. Town Manager's Report. (5 mins.)
Bob McLaurin
11. Adjournment (9:45 P.M.)
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT !TAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 7/25/00, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 8/1/00,
BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 8/1 /00, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice
or 479-2356 TDD for information.
C:XAGENDA.TC
N(Ducal
bra una PParia de Sialud Paxa Los N os
En
NgAbadlo, J o , 000
Hor :®®----1:®0 .m.
En al par e dal estacionamiento
de cams rno"viles
Dotsero
Revtsi.ones mkdi .s, y pruebas de vision y oido
Es p e del Club Rofari.o to r-ional
RahrA folletos de Ralud pares mda fandlia
(Nota: No habrA -wac uws o pruebas do mugre Pan ester revIsiones)
Notice!
Roth Fair for Chfldren
Sponsored by Rotary Internatlo l
~qxzturday, July 2, 2000
Dotsero, 9:00- 1:00
Me&cel checlcaps, including hearing and vision testg, and infor a t?oiial
mteriale_ No irnmumimbora or blood tests gill be done at this health _
Child tioaitrl Task F~~~MMyMMMM~
From Carol Hymers and Carolyn Cage
Telephome: 970949-9766 (Carolyn), 949-6M (Carol)
Fax 970-949-9723
E.nta{le:: _cev*va4,M6 mva"aoLe m
FACT SHEET
"Rotary Child Health Task Force"
June 27, 2000
Notes on the ChHdrea's Opportunity Grant from Rotary International
This grant has been made directly Rotary International, from the Children's Opportunity
grant program, grant No. 1443.
The amount 6f the s...t is $25,000
The money is being carried as a restricted account on the books of the Vail/Eagle Valley Rotary
. - Club, Treasurer Klaus Kunter
Term of grant May 15, 2000 to May 15, 2001
Launch date for project: Wednesday, July 19', at the VaiWagle Valley Xotary Club
First health s~xw,,ing: Dotsero, Saturday, July 29th
Community Participation
Many agencies have participated extensively in the design of this project, including:
Eagle County Health and Human Services
Eagle Care Clinic of Vail Valley Medical Center
Eagle County School District Head Start
l;agle County School District Child Find
Catholic Charities
Colorado State University Cooperative Extension Division
Colorado West Mental Health Center
The Literacy Project
The Rotary Club of Vail Eagle Valley
Screenings
Within the $25,000 overall budget, $5,000 is budgeted for health screenings to reach
disadvantaged children.
It is estimated by the Public Health Service that three in five Fagle County children are without
health insurance. Many agencies, including all of the agencies on the Task Force, provide
outreach programs with care provided to uninsured clients on a sliding scale of financial ability,
but limited ability is available to refer to health care professionals for more extensive diagnosis,
treatment or follow-up. Acute illness is judged to be a special problem, as well as health
education. It is hoped that the sr-."..ings taking place will greatly extend the "reach" of existing
cfforts, many already well established.
e
2
An overall aim of the present e.m..t is to reach 400 children who have no other access to health
care. For the health screenings, the age group 0-5 years is being targeted, since this cohort is
often not reached by pre-school screenings. (Note: At present, only two public health nurses
cover all of the schools in the valley. Also note that the immunization pros, w.s offered by
Public Health and other agencies are judged to have been very successful in our valley, now
estimating 87% coverage for immunizations.)
Screenings so far have been scheduled as follows:
Dotsem Saturday, July 17'b (note no public building available)
Eagle Saturday, September 16`s (with the Back-to-School Health Fair)
Avon No date set
Edwards No date set
Initial screenings will be utilizing the "Denver II" devel-pi-.ental as well as visual
screenings and technically sophisticated screening for early hearing problems. The "Denver II"
exam requires about 45 minutes per child by a trained examiner, requiring a table and three
chairs. We anticipate needing six Denver II examiners, all bilingual) These volunteers are
cu..,&..tly being trained by Sharon Thompson of Child Find.) The visual screening takes
4ppi Vximately five minutes per child. The auditory screening, which must take place in a noise-
free environment, takes an estimated five minutes.
Rotary co-chairs Carolyn Cage and Carol Hymers have relied upon the extensive experience of
the various existing agencies to determine priority needs for locations of screenings and structure
of the voucher program. This is truly a partnership project!
The Child Health Task Force is relying on the resources of the Rotary Club to implement the four
scheduled screenings. Rotary has extensive know-how in conducting public events, and much
help is needed. We expect that after the first screening in Dotsero (by far the most difficult
site), the task will become progressively easier, and members who have participated in one
s. d:: -ing can bring their experience to the next screening.
Pomeher Program
The remainder, $20,000, is being utilized to implement a voucher system whereby children are
t.l..Vided access to medical care unavailable through other programs. The voucher system
"Rotary Child Health Card" is intended to be a "payer of last resort" for medical care. It does not
include hospitalization expenses or surgical expenses. Five health-professional "gatekeepers"
will be implementing the vouchers and referring clients. Vouchers are numbered and a database
has been established for accountability purposes, while preserving confidentiality for clients. We
have much to learn lr,,,,. this program! Toucher issuance is not limited to the 0-5 age group, but
is not intended not to be used after age 18.
Within the voucher program a "special needs" committee of health professionals has been
set up to consider cases where extensive treatment or follow-up is needed, in order for
r
r
3
there to be a determination how resources may be applied. This committee will meet on
an as-needed basis.
The Task Force anticipates needing the help of Rotary volunteers in maintaining the database,
interim reports and publicity to Rotary International and the local community, as well as
assistance in follow-up &.A requests.
Each Task Force member, for the screenings and for work with the voucher programs, will be
required to sign a pledge of confidentiality with regard to client and/or patient information before
taking part in the screenings Each client of the program must sign a consent form permitting the
limited distribution of personal information.
For further questions or information, please call Rotary Task Force co-chairs; Carol Hymers (476-
6033) or Carolyn Cage (949-9766.)
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THIS Il"ORTANT AND
GROUND-BREAKING PROJECT!
ORDINANCE NO. 17
Series of 2000
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 4, SECTION 3-4-1 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE, TO REMOVE PLANNING AND ENVRIONMENTAL COMMISSION REPRESENTATION
ON THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has
recommended that the Planning and Environmental Commission representation on the Design
Review Board be removed; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers the amount of time necessary for a Planning and
Environmental Commissioner to attend both the Planning and Environmental Commission
meetings and the Design Review Board meetings as excessive and difficult for working
professionals to attend.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Title 3, Chapter 4, Section 3-4-1 of the Municipal Code, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
There is established a Design Review Board (DRB) of the Town. The Design Review
Board shall be composed of five (5) members. Each member shall be a resident of the Town,
and appointed by the Town Council.
Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have
passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, .
regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
Section 3 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
Section 4. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in
this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that
occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or
proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any
provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or
superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall
not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore
repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 18th day of July, 2000, and a public
hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 1 st day of August, 2000, in the Council
Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
FAcdev\0RD\00\0RD1 Tdoc 1
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
Attest:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 1 st day of
August, 2000.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
Attest:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
F:\cdev\ORD\00\ORD1 Tdoc 2
ORDINANCE NO. 18
SERIES OF 2000
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF FEE TITLE TO UNIT #6,
VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOS, (PHASE VH ALSO KNOWN AS 2059 CHAMONIX LANE UNIT
#69 VAIL COLORADO 81657.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, pursuant to its buy-down program, purchased the unit located
at 2059 Chamonix Lane Unit #6, Vail, Colorado on June 2, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the reason for purchasing the unit was to place deed restrictions upon the property
and to resell it to a qualified purchaser.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF VAIL, COLORADO that:
1. The Town Council hereby approves the sale of the unit, with appropriate deed
restrictions to ensure affordable housing for an employee in the Town.
2. This unit will be sold as intended on August 2, 2000 to a qualified purchaser who
currently owns no other real estate in Eagle County, shall occupy the property as his principle
residence, has worked, for a period of at least one year, and is presently working in Eagle County,
Colorado, a minimum of thirty (30) hours per week and will continue to so work a minimum of
thirty (30) hours per week. At the time of conveyance from the Town of Vail to the qualified
purchaser, the property will become subject to a deed restriction placing a cap upon appreciation and
limiting future sales to other qualified purchasers.
3. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part,
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants
thereof.
5. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty
imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced,
nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith
are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL
ON FIRST READING this 18th day of July, 2000, and a public hearing shall be held on this
Ordinance on the 1 st day of August, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this 1 st day of August, 2000.
Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro= rem
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
C:Aurinance99.18
' own of Va*1 C munlity Survey
Ove .ew of Results
Prepared for the July 18, 2000 Vail Town Council Review Session
RRC Associates, Boulder, CO
Introduction
For the thirteenth consecutive year, the Town of Vail conducted a survey of Town residents, absentee
property owners, and business owners to evaluate opinions on a variety of issues. RRC Associates of
Boulder, Colorado was again retained to assist in this effort. The purpose of the survey was to evaluate
respondents' level of satisfaction with respect to a full range of community services, and to gather
opinions on selected issues currently facing the Vail community.
This year, the survey was conducted using a combination ofmailback, Internet, and telephone survey
techniques. A total of 1,072 survey responses were collected. The year 2000 survey was designed to
parallel previous surveys in terms of a number of questions related to household demographic profiles, as
well as ratings of services and facilities.
This memo contains a brief summary of key findings for Council review for its July 18, 2000 meeting.
Included with this memo is a copy of the survey questionnaire, with survey results from both 2000 and
1999 shown on the form. A more detailed report will be provided to Town staff under separate cover,
including an expanded written report, quantitative tables, and a full listing of verbatim comments
collected from the open-ended questions on the survey.
Importance of Issues to the Future of Vail
Respondents were asked to rate the importance of a series of issues pertaining to the future of Vail, using
a five-point scale where 1 = "not at all important" and 5 = "very important." As illustrated in Figure 1 on
the following page, all six listed issues were considered important by a majority of respondents.
Protection of environmental resources was ranked as the most important issue (mean rating of 4.4 out of
5), followed by sustaining the economic viability of businesses in Vail (mean 4.2), construction/
maintenance of public infrastructure (4.2), improvement of the sense of community (4.2), improving
transportation modes around Vail (4.0), and facilitating housing for workers in Vail (4.0).
The issue of facilitating housing for workers in Vail, although considered important by a majority of
respondents, also received a moderate proportion of `unimportant' responses (15 percent "1" or "2").
This may be a reflection of continued controversy regarding affordable housing, although again it is
apparent that the majority of respondents consider the issue to be important. Somewhat surprisingly,
second homeowners rated the affordable housing issue slightly more important (mean 4.1) than did local
residents (mean 3.9) (see Figure 2). Second homeowners also gave somewhat higher importance ratings
for construction/maintenance of public infrastructure (mean 4.5, vs. 4.2 for residents), and for improving
transportation modes around Vail (mean 4.2, vs. 4.0 for residents). Residents and second homeowners
gave largely similar importance ratings for protection of environmental resources, improving the sense of
RRC ASSOCIATES 1
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
community, and sustaining the economic viability of businesses in Vail. Additionally, both groups
ranked the six issues in largely similar order of importance.
Figure I
Importance of Issues to the Future of Vail: 2000 Results
80% 5
I
70% .I o ()-4.4 4.5
2 0.4.2 0.4.2-
60%.. _4.0 -04.0 4 n
d _
rn u~ m i'_
- 50%
- v 3.5 0 >
c o E u
CL
40% J. - e - - - 0 3 c
U
o o N o 2.5 c E
77 °v ° rn
a
N N t0 -
c N I d i0
o rL
20% 8-1 o 0 2
8-1
10% m w
0 0 0 0 0 u
0%
Protection of Sustaining economic Construction/ Improvement of the Improving Facilitating housing for
environmental viability of businesses maintenance of sense of community transportation in and workers in Vail
resources infrastructure around Vail
5 - Very important 0 r 3 12 1 i 1 Not at all important --0-- Mean rating of importance
Figure 2
Importance of Issues to the Future of Vail: Local Residents vs. Second Homeowners, 2000 Results
M Importance - local residents
5 1 U Importance - second homeoiNners
4.5
4.4 4.4
4.5; 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.3-
4.1 4.2 4.7
4.1
y j 4.0 _ 3.9
2 3.5 .i. - - - - -
w _
3 -
rn .v ~
d 2.5 - - - - - - - {
c ~ f
2
i
ao
0
z 15
Protection of Improvement of the Sustaining economic Construction/ Improving Facilitating housing
environmental sense of community viability of businesses maintenance of public transportation in and for workers in Vail
resources infrastructure around Vail
RRC ASSOCIATES 2
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
]Effectiveness of the Town of Vail in Addressing Key Issues
In a follow-up question, respondents were asked to rate the effectiveness of the Town of Vail in
addressing the same set of issues discussed above, using a five-point scale where 1 = "not at all effective"
and 5 = "very effective." As illustrated in the graph below, most respondents tend to feel that the Town is
moderately effective in addressing the listed issues, with a majority giving responses of "2," "3," or 444."
Relatively few respondents feel that that the Town is 5 - "very effective" with respect to any of the issues,
but also relatively few feel that the Town is 1 - "not at all effective."
Among the issues evaluated, the Town is seen as most effective with respect to improving transportation
in and around Vail (58 percent "4" or "5"), construction/maintenance of public infrastructure (56 percent
"4" or "5"), and to a lesser degree, protection of environmental resources (44 percent "4" or "5"). The
Town is viewed as somewhat less effective in terms of improving the sense of community (33 percent "1"
or "2"), facilitating housing for workers in Vail (38 percent "1" or "2"), and sustaining the economic
viability of businesses in Vail (40 percent "I" or "2").
Figure 3
Effectiveness of the Town of Vail in Addressing Issues: 2000 Results
80% 5
I
70% - - - - - - 4.5
II
60% I-- 4
' d d
m
105 a,
50% - 0-3.5_.__ 03.5 - - - - - 3.5 >
c v v __--0-33 v u
M v o in
g~ o _R
v 13 a m
m 40% I
o 2.0 rn
2.
0
o 2.7 E d
d 30% " o o 2.5 d
N
d - o N o N
76
A. N c"
20%I o a _ a o e i2 ~o
c m 2
r+) N y, c
0 o x O
10% rn o
1.5
7 ~ , N,-~
M_z
0% ---i - ---r-- - 1
Improving Construction/ Protection of Improvement of the Facilitating housing for Sustaining economic
transportation in and maintenance of environmental sense of community workers in Vail viability of businesses
around Vail infrastructure resources
® 5 - Very effective 0 r== -Q 3 1 2 L 1 - Not at all effective -O- Mean rating of effectiveness
RRC ASSOCIATES 3
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Interestingly, second homeowners give somewhat higher ratings of the Town's effectiveness than do local
residents, as illustrated in Figure 4 below. The greatest differentials are for construction/maintenance of
public infrastructure, protection of environmental resources, and sustaining the economic viability of
businesses in Vail. However, it is also interesting to note that the two groups rank the Town's
effectiveness in addressing the issues in roughly similar order.
Figure 4
Effectiveness of the Town of Vail in Addressing Issues: Local Residents vs. Second Homeowners
4.5 I!, E Effectiveness - local residents
y t5 0 Effectiveness - second homeowners
3.8
4 3.7 . 3.6
d 3.5 3.4
~~3.5
n
32
2.8 31 2.9
26 3.0 _
rn 3 ! - 2.8
Z
R d 2.5 - - -
A
w 2I r
5
z - ~
1.5
I
1
Improving Construction/ Protection of Improvement of the Facilitating housing Sustaining economic
transportation in and maintenance of environmental sense of community for workers in Vail viability of businesses
around Vail infrastructure resources
Should the Town of Vail Take Action to Improve the Community's Economic Vitality?
Respondents were asked whether the TOV government should take action to improve the community's
economic vitality in commercial areas (including retail quality and variety, keeping businesses in Vail,
etc.). The large majority of respondents indicated that TOV should be involved (80 percent), up from last
year's 66 percent. Support for Town involvement in economic vitality issues is uniformly high among
essentially all demographic subgroups, including both residents (82 percent) and second homeowners (76
percent); homeowners (80 percent) and renters (83 percent); persons with varying lengths of residence in
Vail (79 - 84 percent); TOV business owners (84 percent) and non-business owners (80 percent); persons
registered to vote in Vail (80 percent) and not registered in Vail (80 percent); singles, couples, families,
and empty nesters (77 - 83 percent); etc. The broad base of support suggests that the Town essentially
has a "mandate" to take action on the economic vitality issue.
Persons who felt that the town should take action to improve the community's economic vitality were
further asked to rate the importance of a list of actions that could be taken by the town, using a five-point
scale where I = "not at all important" and 5 = "very important." As illustrated in Figure 5 on the
following page, the steps which are viewed as most important are increasing employee housing (mean
rating 4.0), improving lodging quality (4.0), increasing programs/events for visitors (4.0), improving
retail mix/quality (3.9), increasing programs/events for local residents (3.9), and improving the
streetscape (3.8). Steps which are seen as somewhat less important include expanding lodging capacity
(3.4) and updating the sign code (3.3). Steps which are comparatively seen as least important are
increasing the number of lodging beds (2.9) and increasing commercial space (2.7).
RRC ASSOCIATES 4
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 5
Importance of Steps to Improve Community Vitality
80% i 5
i
70% 4.5
C
n.
° I- ar
60 - - - - - - - 4 0
• '---Q-4.0-Q-4.0~a-3.9 0.3.9 - c
c X0.3.8 L-
50% - - 3.5 CL >
° 0.3.3 E v,
CL
40% m M
M c
C~ Imo M 2.71 c L+
M
2.5 °a
o E
a o~
20% I \ Qm ' 0 2 a" ea
i oN - .s N^ t6
30% Lx I
10% Q
1.5 z
u
0% 1
xCN o°a\~ 5a~~~5 `~Qe Q~or1 ;y\o~.5 Oeae yQaoe
oe\oao, o~a~5 ,e`e`a~ Q`oey ye\oa~~ aJQaa~e ~e`o~~o ~~~e
o~ee\a ` e`5\Q~ \~Q~o ~a6y ~cc c~ea Sao o~ aye
Q~ eo \Qko ~c mac aye° \co~e
e~ ee 13 to ore
5e0e cooae ~c
~e
m~ 5 - Very important P 14 F 3 r --Q P 11 - Not at all important --0- Mean rating of importance
Use / Contact With Selected 'down Services and Facilities
Figure 6 on page 8 illustrates the proportion of residents and second homeowners who used or had contact
with selected Town of Vail services and facilities over the previous 12 months. Overall, in the past 12
months, 86 percent of local residents used the TOV bus system; 72 percent hold a TOV library card; 69
percent visited, called, or emailed the library; 36 percent used the library community room; 29 percent
used the Community Development Department; 25 percent had contact with Animal Control; and 13
percent utilized Fire Services. Not surprisingly, local residents tend to exhibit higher use / contact rates
than second homeowners, except that both groups are about equally likely to have used the bus system
and the library community room in the previous 12 months.
Ratings of Selected Aspects of TOV Services / Sense of Community
Figure 7, on page 9, illustrates selected ratings of TOV services and the sense of a community,
specifically those aspects rated on a three-point scale. The year 2000 responses of local residents are
presented next to results from second homeowners. Findings include:
o Responsiveness of TOV Government: Most local residents feel that the responsiveness of town
government has stayed the same over the past year (57 percent), while somewhat more feel it has
improved (28 percent) than gotten worse (15 percent). Second homeowners largely feel that
RRC ASSOCIATES 5
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
responsiveness has remained the same (75 percent), while again more feel it has improved (20
percent) than gotten worse (5 percent).
• Level of Traffic Enforcement: Most locals feel the current level of enforcement is about right (70
percent), while 17 percent consider it to be too little and 13 percent consider it to be too much.
Second homeowners are even more supportive of the current level of traffic enforcement (90 percent),
with 5 percent considering it to be too little and 5 percent considering it to be too much.
• Parking Enforcement: While most locals consider the current level of parking enforcement to be
about right (55 percent), a significant minority consider it to be too much (38 percent), while 7
percent consider it to be too little. Second homeowners are again largely satisfied with enforcement
levels (78 percent), although again somewhat more consider it to be too much (14 percent) than too
little (8 percent).
• Code Enforcement: Both locals and second homeowners largely consider code enforcement levels to
be about right (75 - 87 percent), while slightly more consider it to be too little (1 I - 15 percent) than
too much (3 - 10 percent).
• Leash Law Patrols: Leash law patrols are among the more controversial issues for locals, with 42
percent considering patrols to be too little, 23 percent considering them to be about right, and 36
percent considering them to be too much. Most second homeowners consider leash law patrols to be
about right (63 percent), with somewhat more preferring more patrolling (25 percent) than less
patrolling (13 percent).
• Frequency of In-Town Shuttle: Both local residents and second homeowners largely agree that the
frequency of in town shuttles is about right (85 - 89 percent), with most of the remainder considering
them not frequent enough (I 1 - 13 percent), and only 0 - 2 percent considering them too fiequent.
• Frequency of Outlying Bus Services: Locals and second homeowners also agree that existing service
levels for outlying busses are about right (75 - 78 percent), although a somewhat greater proportion
consider these services to be too infrequent (21 - 23 percent).
• Sense of Community: Opinions are fairly split regarding whether the sense of community within the
Town has improved, stayed the same, or declined over the past two years, with both locals and second
homeowners tending on balance towards a negative assessment. The largest proportions of locals feel
that the sense of community has stayed the same (39 percent) or declined (39 percent), while 14
percent feel it has improved and 7 percent don't know or have no opinion. Second homeowners are
also more likely to feel the sense of community has gotten worse (25 percent) than gotten better (13
percent), while 39 percent feel it has stayed the same and 23 percent don't know or have no opinion.
Ratings of TOV Government Services and Facilities
The bulk of the 2000 Community Survey, as in years past, consisted of questions asking respondents to
rate their satisfaction with a variety of TOV departmental services and facilities on a five-point scale,
where 1 = "not at all satisfied" and 5 = "very satisfied." Figures 8A, 813, and 8C on pages 10 - 12
illustrate the average (mean) responses of local residents in 2000 vs. 1999. Figures 9A, 913, and 9C on
pages 13 - 15 provide the same results for second homeowners. In both cases, instances in which there is
likely to be a statistically significant difference in the results between 2000 and 1999 are called out,
through a notation indicating 80+ percent, 90+ percent, 95+ percent, or 99+ percent confidence that there
is a genuine difference (positive or negative) between the two years.
Overall, the ratings tend to exhibit a high degree of stability between 2000 and 1999. In many cases the
results are quite similar, including a similar rank order of rated items in the various departments. Based
on the resident survey results, changes which appear to have occurred in the past two years include slight
RRC ASSOCIATES 6
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
improvements in ratings for Information Dissemination, General Administration, and certain aspects of
the Community Development Department and Public Works. Slight declines appear to have occurred for
certain aspects of the Police and Bus Service. In the second homeowner results, Bus Service ratings also
appear to have dropped somewhat, along with the Municipal Court, General Administration, certain
aspects of Public Works, and Parking. Conversely, Police ratings show some improvement in the second
homeowner results.
Results from the departmental ratings and other portions of the survey will be discussed in more detail at
the July 18, 2000 Town Council Review Session.
RRC ASSOCIATES 7
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 6
Use of / Contact With Town of Vail Facilities and Services: 2000 Results
¦ Residents 2000 Percent of Respondents
0 Second homeowners 2000 I 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes ,29% 1
° USED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT IN PAST 12 MO.
!
71%
No 18$%
13% UTILIZED FIRE SERVICES IN PAST 12 MONTHS
Yes
8719%
No 198%
j
' HAD CONTACT WITH ANIMAL CONTROL IN PAST 12 MO.
Yes 25%,
0
75%
No X94%
86°0
Yes 192%
No 14% ; USED TOV BUS SYSTEM IN PAST 12 MONTHS
i
Frequently-almost every day 19% o !
126% (IF USE TOV BUS) HOW OFTEN DO YOU
° NORMALLY USE THE BUS j
Often-about once a week 32 35%, !
;290/
Sometimes-once a month or so °
Rarely-less than once a month 1 .20%
Yes 72%
149%
HOLD A TOV LIBRARY CARD !
28%
No 151%
69%
Yes
° VISITED, CALLED, OR EMAILED
31% LIBRARY IN PAST 12 MONTHS
No 152%
USED LIBRARY COMMUNITY ROOM
Yes 36 % IN PAST 12 M0.
64%
NO 64%
RRC ASSOCIATES 8
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
J
Figure 7
Ratings of Selected Aspects of TOV Services and Sense of Community: 2000 Results
Percent of Respondents
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
- - - - I - - --I - - -i - - - - I - - - --I ----------f - i - -
Gotten worse , ° 15% ; RESPONSIVENESS OF TOV GOVT OVER THE PAST YEAR
Stayed the same 175%
Improved °
o Residents 2000
I' Second homeowners 2000
LEVEL OF TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
Too Little 17%
Just About Right ° i
190
Too Much 13%
Too Little LEVEL OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT
Just About Right 178%
Too Much jo%
°
i
Too Little 15%i LEVEL OF CODE ENFORCEMENT
Just About Right 187%
i
Too Much "P.M 10%
42% LEASH LAW PATROLS
Too Little °
Just About Right t63/ i i
Too Much 36%
Not Frequent Enough j%% FREQUENCY OF IN-TOWN SHUTTLE
About Right 89%
%
Too Frequent °
!
Not Frequent Enough 120% FREQUENCY OF OUTLYING BUS SERVICES
About Right , OS%
Too Frequent
Improved 3~g% SENSE OF COMMUNITY IN TOWN OVER PAST 2 YRS
Stayed the same R0,1100
39%
Gotten worse
°
Don't know/no opinion ~u° t 23%
RRC ASSOCIATES 9
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 8A
Satisfaction with TOV Services - LOCAL RESIDENTS, 2000 vs. 1999
(Ratings flagged where there is an 80%+ chance that there is a genuine difference between years)
Mean Satisfaction Ratings (1 = Not at all satisfied 15 = Very satisfied)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
BOARDS / STAFF: TOWN OF VAIL STAFF l 3.8
~ I ~ I i I I
BOARDS / STAFF: CURRENT TOWN COUNCIL I 3.2
I I I
BOARDS / STAFF: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES BOARD 3.1 t
BOARDS / STAFF: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 3.0
¦ 2000: Residents
BOARDS I STAFF: PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION . 3.0
1111999: Residents
TOWN FUNCTION: INFORMATION DISSEMINATION 3.80
99% significance
TOWN FUNCTION: GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 3.73
99% significance
I
TOWN FUNCTION: MUNICIPAL COURT 3.72
( I I ;
I I j I
CDD: COURTESY AND ATTITUDE 3.94
90% significance
CDD: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN VAIL 3.93 j
99% significance I 3.48
i ~
CDD: QUALITY OF NEW DEVELOPMENT 3.84
95% significance
CDD: CLEANLINESS OF RESTAURANTS 3.73
3.86 I
3.62
CDD: OVERALL SERVICE AND EFFICIENCY
CDD: BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW/INSPECTION 3.43 3.25 t I I
0
CDD: LIVABILITY OF VAIL .16
3.1
12
PUBLIC WORKS: SNOW REMOVAL ' I 4 14.
6
16
PUBLIC WORKS: OVERALL PARK MAINTENANCE 4.09
80% significance „ 1 99
PUBLIC WORKS: PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT SAFETY 4.01
4.00
PUBLIC WORKS: FRIENDLY/COURTEOUS ATTITUDE OF EMPS 3.95
PUBLIC WORKS: ROAD/STREET MAINTENANCE BY TOV aoll
I I
80% significance 71
i I I I
i
PUBLIC WORKS: APPEARANCE/CONDITION TOWN OWNED BLDS 3'771
3.75!
PUBLIC WORKS: CLEANLINESS OF PEDESTRIAN VILLAGES I 3.71
I I
PUBLIC WORKS: FRONTAGE RD MAINTENANCE BY STATE OF CO 3.65
. 3.61 I
RRC ASSOCIATES 10
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 813
Satisfaction with TOV Services - LOCAL RESIDENTS, 2000 vs. 1999 (Cont'd)
(Ratings flagged where there is an 80N+ chance that there is a genuine difference between years)
Mean Satisfaction Ratings (1 = Not at all satisfied 15 = Very satisfied)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
FIRE SERVICE: EMERGENCY MEDICAL OR FIRST AID ASSISTANCE 4.48
4.55
FIRE SERVICE: RESPONSE TIME/ARRIVAL ON-SCENE 439
4.41
FIRE SERVICE: COURTESY AND ATTITUDE 437
4.38
FIRE SERVICE: YOUR CONFIDENCE IN THE ABILITY OF VFD 4.34
I I I I ~
FIRE SERVICE: PROFESSIONAL IN APPEARANCE AND ACTIONS 4.30
FIRE SERVICE: EXPLAINS WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE I 4.18
I I
FIRE SERVICE: PUBLIC FIRE SAFETY EDUCATION PROGRAM I 95
'3.96
- I I I i i
FIRE SERVICE: FIRE PREVENTION/INSPECTION SERVICE 3 & 13.94
j
~ J
4.13 j j
POLICE: DECALS/SIGNS ON POLICE CARS
POLICE: OVERALL FEELING OF SAFETY AND SECURITY 4.11
99% significance 4.27
4.09 i
POLICE: UNIFORMS OF POLICE FOOTNEHICLE PATROL I I I
POLICE: VISIBILITY OF POLICE FOOTNEHICLE PATROL 3.93
80% significance 4.01 I
' I I I I I ~
POLICE: FRIENDLINESS & APPROACHABILITY OF POLICE 3.89
95% significance 4.04
I i I I I I I
POLICE: OVERALL QUALITY OF SERVICE 3187
99% significance 4.05
i I ! I I I i
POLICE: OVERALL FAIRNESS OF POLICE EMPLOYEES 3.70
90% significance 3.34
I
® 2000: Residents
ANIMAL CONTROL: RESPONSE TIME TO COMPLAINTS 3.23 [31999: Residents
3.2i8
I i I i i i I I
I
ANIMAL CONTROL: OVERALL QUALITY OF SERVICE 3.08
80% significance 3.35
RRC ASSOCIATES 11
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 8C
Satisfaction with TOV Services - LOCAL RESIDENTS, 2000 vs. 1999 (Cont'd)
(Ratings flagged where there is an 80%+ chance that there is a genuine difference between years)
Mean Satisfaction Ratings (1= Not at all satisfied 15 = Very satisfied)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
BUS SERVICE: BUS DRIVER COURTESY 4.03
4.01 i
i I I I !
BUS SERVICE: SAFE DRIVING HABITS OF BUS DRIVER i3.98
I
BUS SERVICE: DEPENDABILITY OF BUS SERVICE 3.92 i
99% significance - 4.15
I
BUS SERVICE: CLEANLINESS OF BUSSES 3 89
3.98
90% significance
I I I~ I i ! ~ j
BUS SERVICE: CLEANLINESS OF VAIL BUS TERMINAL 3.82
95% significance .3.96
PUBLIC PARKING: SPEED OF TRANSACTION AT AUTOMATIC BOOTH 3.81
I I i i I ~
PUBLIC PARKING: BOOTH ATTENDANT COURTESY 3.61
99% significance 3186 j
I I I I 3.39 I I
PUBLIC PARKING: SPEED OF TRANSACTION AT STAFFED BOOTHS , 1
I
PUBLIC PARKING: CLEANLINESS & LIGHTING OF STRUCTURES 3.211
3.25
2.82 -
PUBLIC PARKING: OVERALL PARKING FEES/PRICING STRUCTURE 2.80 i ¦ 2000: Residents
0 1999: Residents
4.31
LIBRARY SERVICE: MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS 4.29
LIBRARY SERVICE: MATERIAL CHECKOUT 4.26 i
i
4.20
LIBRARY SERVICE: ALTERNATE MEDIA (VIDEO/BOOKS ON TAPE) 2
I I
LIBRARY SERVICE: YOUTH PROGRAMS 4.40g
! j I i I
4.09 j
LIBRARY SERVICE: FICTION AND NON-FICTION BOOKS 4.14 !
.i I i I I
LIBRARY SERVICE: ON-LINE DATABASES 4.09 I
.09
LIBRARY SERVICE: RESEARCH INFORMATION 14.19
1
I I I ! I I I., j
LIBRARY SERVICE: YOUTH MATERIALS , 4.06
4.08
i I i ! ~ ! i I
LIBRARY SERVICE: PARKING/ACCESS 3.34 j
.21 I - -
RRC ASSOCIATES 12
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 9A
Satisfaction with TOV Services - SECOND HOMEOWNERS, 2000 vs. 1999
(Ratings flagged where there is an 80%+ chance that there is a genuine difference between years)
Mean Satisfaction Ratings (1 = Not at all satisfied 15 = Very satisfied)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
BOARDS / STAFF: TOWN OF VAIL STAFF 4.0
BOARDS / STAFF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES BOARD 3.5
BOARDS / STAFF: CURRENT TOWN COUNCIL ' 4
I I
BOARDS 1 STAFF: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 3.2
BOARDS / STAFF: PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION 3.0
¦ 2000: Second Homeowners
101999: Second Homeowners
TOWN FUNCTION: INFORMATION DISSEMINATION 74 3
i
TOWN FUNCTION: MUNICIPAL COURT 3.78
80% confidence # 14.14
TOWN FUNCTION: GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 3.69
80% confidence 3 6
I I ~ I I
I it ~ I !
I j I
CDD: QUALITY OF NEW DEVELOPMENT 4.17 j
CDD: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN VAIL 4.03 13.8
I I I
CDD: CLEANLINESS OF RESTAURANTS 13'98
i
3.72
CDD: COURTESY AND ATTITUDE ~
CDD: LIVABILITY OF VAIL 3.60 j
i I I
CDD: BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW/INSPECTION 3.35
3.56
CDD: OVERALL SERVICE AND EFFICIENCY 3.21
PUBLIC WORKS: SNOW REMOVAL 4.3
61
I I I I I
PUBLIC WORKS: FRIENDLY/COURTEOUS ATTITUDE OF EMPLOYEES I 4.15 l
I I ~ j i I
PUBLIC WORKS: PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT SAFETY 4,13
80% confidence
4.28
PUBLIC WORKS: ROAD/STREET MAINTENANCE BY TOWN OFVAIL 012
14.
PUBLIC WORKS: OVERALL PARK MAINTENANCE q 08
99% confidence 418
I I i i I i I I
PUBLIC WORKS: CLEANLINESS OF PEDESTRIAN VILLAGES 4.04
I I l l
PUBLIC WORKS: FRONTAGE ROAD MAINTENANCE BY STATE OF CO 4.01
4.04
I i I I i
PUBLIC WORKS: APPEARANCE/CONDITION TOWN OWNED BUILDINGS 3.91
.90
j
RRC ASSOCIATES 13
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 9B
Satisfaction with TOV Services - SECOND HOMEOWNERS, 2000 vs. 1999 (Cont'd)
(Ratings flagged where there is an 80%+ chance that there is a genuine difference between years)
Mean Satisfaction Ratings (1 = Not at all satisfied 15 = Very satisfied)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
FIRE SERVICE: EMERGENCY MEDICAL OR FIRST AID ASSISTANCE 4674'
I, I ~ i I
FIRE SERVICE: RESPONSE TIME/ARRIVAL ON-SCENE 4.65
14.47
W a. v.
-I i I I i I ~
FIRE SERVICE: COURTESY AND ATTITUDE 4 54 67
- 1
I ! I I
FIRE SERVICE: YOUR CONFIDENCE IN THE ABILITY OF VFD 4.48
i
4.35
FIRE SERVICE: EXPLAINS WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
I ~
FIRE SERVICE: PROFESSIONAL IN APPEARANCE AND ACTIONS ! .4'31
FIRE SERVICE: PUBLIC FIRE SAFETY EDUCATION PROGRAM 4'21;
14.57
I I ! I I. !
FIRE SERVICE: FIRE PREVENTION/INSPECTION SERVICE 4.17 1
4.15
¦ 2000: Second Homeowners
1 1 101999: Second Homeowners
POLICE: FRIENDLINESS & APPROACHABILITY OF POLICE I4.;351
99% confidence 4.05 1
POLICE: OVERALL FEELING OF SAFETY AND SECURITY 4.32
4.
36
POLICE: DECALS/SIGNS ON POLICE CARS ' 4'28
' I i I j I 4.251
POLICE: OVERALL QUALITY OF SERVICE 4 15
! ! I I i I
POLICE: UNIFORMS OF POLICE FOOT/VEHICLE PATROL 4.23,
1 I I I I
! I I ! ! I
4.10
POLICE: OVERALL FAIRNESS OF POLICE EMPLOYEES 4.07
POLICE: VISIBILITY OF POLICE FOOT/VEHICLE PATROL 3.93 1
99% confidence u. 3.60 j
I I 1 ~ 1
I I . I ~
ANIMAL CONTROL: RESPONSE TIME TO COMPLAINTS 4.00
3.50
; ~ I I I
i.92
ANIMAL CONTROL: OVERALL QUALITY OF SERVICE
!-3.14
RRC ASSOCIATES 14
t
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 2000: OVERVIEW OF RESULTS FOR 7/18/00 COUNCIL REVIEW SESSION
Figure 9C
Satisfaction with TOV Services - SECOND HOMEOWNERS, 2000 vs. 1999 (Cont'd)
(Ratings flagged where there is an 80%+ chance that there is a genuine difference between years)
Mean Satisfaction Ratings (1= Not at all satisfied 15 = Very satisfied)
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
1
BUS SERVICE: SAFE DRIVING HABITS OF BUS DRIVER 4.19
I
BUS SERVICE: BUS DRIVER COURTESY 4.10
99% confidence 4.33
1 I I I ' i i
BUS SERVICE: DEPENDABILITY OF BUS SERVICE qAu
99% confidence 74. I 5
BUS SERVICE: CLEANLINESS OF BUSSES 3.94
99% confidence ' 4.27
I I
BUS SERVICE: CLEANLINESS OF VAIL BUS TERMINAL 3187 1
99% confidence 14.23
I I
PUBLIC PARKING: SPEED OF TRANSACTION AT AUTOMATIC BOOTH 3.88
I I I ~
PUBLIC PARKING: BOOTH ATTENDANT COURTESY 3.81
95% confidence 4.07
PUBLIC PARKING: SPEED OF TRANSACTION AT STAFFED BOOTHS 3.64 ;
I ~
PUBLIC PARKING: CLEANLINESS & LIGHTING OF STRUCTURES 3.48 i
3.57
I I I ~ i j I ~
PUBLIC PARKING: OVERALL PARKING FEES/PRICING STRUCTURE 15'3
N 2000: Second Homeowners
E3 1999: Second Homeowners
LIBRARY SERVICE: MATERIAL CHECKOUT 4.42
i i I I I
I i ! I ~ I
LIBRARY SERVICE: MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS 4I37
LIBRARY SERVICE: ALTERNATE MEDIA (VIDEO/BOOKS ON TAPE) I I I I 4.181
i i
LIBRARY SERVICE: ON-LINE DATABASES 4.13
LIBRARY SERVICE: YOUTH MATERIALS 4'11 1
LIBRARY SERVICE: RESEARCH INFORMATION 4.10
LIBRARY SERVICE: FICTION AND NON-FICTION BOOKS 4.06
I
LIBRARY SERVICE: YOUTH PROGRAMS I i 14.03
' I
LIBRARY SERVICE: PARKING/ACCESS 3.61
RRC ASSOCIATES 15
Town of Vail Community Surrey 2000 Final Results
Residents and Absentee Responses Consolidated
Unless otherwise indicated, results indicate percentage of respondents.
o Where applicable, results to the 1999 Town of Vail Community Survey
have been included.
-FERST, A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT Wdtl O B/ATL GOC/ERNIl1ENT.ee
1 How satisfied are you with the following functions of the Town of Vail government? Use a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means "not at all
satisfied" and 5 means "very satisfied" to rate each of the following items. Please use DKINO (Don't Know/No Opinion) as appropriate.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Current Town Council 2000 5 13 40 37 6 3.3
jP+g and Environmental Commission
also knovm as the PEC) _ _ 2000 8 19 25 6
~ - 41 . . 3.
Desi;an Board (ak a thA DRBi 2®0a, I(D ~3 38 25 S 300
krttn Pub4ic Places Board (a ,La, AIPP . 20M. .13 1€ 30 27.J-- 11
8
Town of Vail staff 2000 3 6 25 43 23 308
2 Over the past year, would you say the responsiveness of the Town of Vail government has gotten worse, stayed the same, or
improved? GOTTEN STAYED THE
WORSE SAME IMPROVED
1 2 3
2000 13 61 26
3 The Town of Vail has identified its involvement in the following issues as important to the future of Vail. Please rate how important you
feel these issues are.
NOT AT ALL VERY
IMPORTANT IMPORTANT MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Protection of Vail's environmental resources 2000 1 4 9 22 64 4.4
'(rnproverr}ent of fhz sense of ~r nt#v in Vail #bO 2 4 - 1'7 ;6 51, 4:27
Construction and maintenance of public
infrastructure (roads, sewers, etc.) to
serve both residents and guests 2000 1 3 14 34 47 4.2
rit roving ~ vari'or~s~fbdes 11 ' -
~ In and
i around Vail._(ky-pedestrian, bike,.etc) 2000 _ 2
Facilitating a range of housing opportunities
for those who work in Vail 2000 8 8 14 22 49 400
iS6iUU a' e ncmrc , h ~f - _ dsses in Vail 200,6' 3 3 15 2 36 4,2 ~'d
-.i.aq
4 How effective is the Town of Vail in addressing these same issues?
NOT AT ALL VERY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Protection of Vail's environmental resources 2000 5 14 36 36 8 3.3
Improvementofthe use &,ommunih in Uad_ 20 '9D 4 42 20, 5 x!09
Construction and maintenance of public
infrastructure (roads, sewers, etc.) to
serve both residents and guests 2000 4 8 31 45 12 3.5
:Improving various modes of transport`ition In and_--
! around Vail (Pvblie pttVatB' 0*, 2,W0 4 r -9 ~30- 46' 13
Facilitating a range of housing opportunities
for those who work in Vail 2000 14 24 37 19 6 2.8
§uiWVA ewnomicvraA&y of businesses in Vail 16 -4 2.7
5 Do you have any comments about the Town's approach to these issues?
TOWN OF VAIL PRIORITIES
6 Do you feel the Town of Vail government should take action to improve the community's economic vitality (including retail quality and
variety, keeping businesses in Vail, etc.) in commercial areas?
2000 1999
80 66 Yes
20 34 No [SKIP TO Q. 8]
7 (IF YES) In which of the following areas should the Town government take action to improve community vitality?
NOT AT ALL VERY
IMPORTANT IMPORTANT MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Increase commercial space 2000 21 23 28 16 12 2.7
1999 23 23 29 16 9 2.7
:Increase numberWodF0 AS 2000 18 23 _ -27 IS If, 4. X09
19" 26=- -27 -27 -__16, 41: 2.7
Increase lodging occupancy 2000 12 14 22 27 25 3.4
1999 9 15 24 26 25 3.4
Improve lodging quakt 26,00 a_:. 8 12 27 46 409' A
1989 8 8_ 25 31 27 3.S
Incr--~s- m, ;y~~ Safford hlel hournq 2000 6 8 15 20 51 4.0
Improve i9bil rfiixlqu y 6:' 3 ` 22 30 39 3.9
Improve streetscape 2000 2 10 28 31 30 3.8
(pavers, street fixtures, landscaping, etc.) 1999 8 21 32 22 17 3.2
kcrease events/programs for local residents
(cultural events /prograMS
8rts, family entertainment, etc. 21WO 2 6 24 34
Increase events/programs for visitors (cultural events/
programs,arts, family entertainment, etc.) 2000 2 7 22 32 38 4.0
Review the sin code to clarify r
and update N uvi3i ns 2000 10 ' 13 33 ; 24, 20 3.1
Do you have any comments on these potential actions?
2
8 Please rate your satisfaction with the following Town of Vail functions.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
General administration (manager's office, finance
department,human resources department, 2000 2 5 31 44 18 3.7
clerk's office, staff) 1999 4 7 36 35 17 3.6
lnformabon Ai semina6on (via town newsietters, 2060 1 6 31 38 23 3.8 °f
Gha?fnel 19; etc
Municipal Court 2000 4 4 31 36 25 3.7
1999 2 7 32 29 29 3.7
COMWATTY DEVELOPMENT
The Community Development Depa, Loosent provides planning, design review, environmental
programs, and building and restaurant inspection services.
9 Have you used the Community Development Department with the past 12 months?
2000 1999
26 22 Yes
74 78 No [SKIP TO Q.11]
10 (IF YES) Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of the Community Development Department.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Overall service and efficiency 2000 9 8 23 35 24 3.6
1999 7 13 29 36 16 3.4
~rtesy and attittt e 20(W- - - 5 -8----- 19- 26 41 3.9
19%9 4 15 21 33. 28 3.7
Building permit review and inspections 2000 12 12 24 26 26 3.4
1999 7 19 28 27 19 3.3
11 (ALL RESPONDENTS) Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of the Community Development Department.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Livability of Vail (environment, quality of development, 2000 6 17 32 35 10 3.2
amenities versus cost to live here) 1999 12 19 24 33 12 3.1
Environmental quality in the Town' of Vail 2000 2 5 19 47 28, 3.J
_(air water, etc.) A _ 19"j, 4. 42.. 2fi 43 ~ 7 3.6
Quality of new development and redevelopment
over the past three years (Austria Haus, 2000 3 4 19 46 28 3.9
Golden Peak, Slifer Plaza, streetscape, etc.) 1999 6 11 20 43 21 3.6
;Cleanliness of restaurants in Vail 2000. 2 9 21
48 22 3.$
_ 99 5 47; Z
3
i
PUBLIC WORKS
The Public Works Department provides maintenance of public areas including parks, roads
and streets.
12 Rate your satisfaction with Public Works services in the Town of Vail.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Snow removal 2000 2 3 14 37 43 4.2
1999 2 2 12 44 40 4.2
FrontageRoad ma1113cIlance ~y the 2000 3 = ; Y3 _ 26 38 25 3.7
EAI_;A adD 1909 9.. _21 42 23 3.7_
Road and street maintenance by the 2000 3 6 21 42 29 3.9
Town of Vail 1999 3 5 22 46 24 3.8
3
Park pIaygroundecuipment safety 2000 2 3' 19 44; 33 410
. ,3 1899 1 13 53 30 J'l.9
Overall park maintenance 2000 1 2 15 52 30 4,.1
1999 2 2 15 50 31 4.1
,rAppearance and condition of 2000 2 5 24 48: 21 3,8
to'*i-Owned t4okg5 _ 1959 2 - 5 27 45 '21 _ 3,8
Friendliness and courteous attitude of
Public Works employees 2000 2 5 19 41 33 4.0
jDeanltneK of ped,% %s 2000 ,4 " 6 23 43 - _ 24 3,8
EMERGENCY SERVICES
13 Have you utilized Fire Services within the past 12 months?
2000 1999
11 17 Yes
89 83 No
14 Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of Fire Services in the Town of Vail.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Fire response time/arrival on-scene 2000 - 1 13 30 57 4.4
1999 - 3 6 33 57 4.4
1EM64- ncy,me& _1 cr first aid ass' fance 10430 - - 2 5 : 32 t 4.5
1999 - - 3 - ' . 2 _ 20 67 . 4.6
Courtesy and attitude 2000 1 2 9 33 55 4.4
1999 2 2 7 29 60 4.4
lPubliC fire safety e ur,. ion program 7W - 2 . 4 38 34 4.0
i
a- - - 1iM 3 4 2$ 3 3-9
Fire prevention/inspection service 2000 3 5 20 39 34 4.0
1999 4 7 14 38 35 3.9
P_rOfE 35i~! in M{tr~aratice and a tins - 26Do - - 1 10 45 4 4.3 f
Firefighters take time to explain what needs
to be done 2000 1 4 16 33 46 4.2
YQt1C_G0nfideflCP in the abila V Of rte
4
Val Ire`f rr isnf 2040: _ _1 1 2 36 51 4.4
15 Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of Police Services in the Town of Vail.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Overall feeling of safety and security 2000 2 1 15 42 39 4.2
1999 1 4 10 40 46 4.3
r- _
riendliness and approachability of 2000 3__ -6 16 39 36 4.0
Val police department employees S 54 41 37 4;0
Overall quality of service 2000 2 3 22 44 29 3.9
1999 2 3 15 46 34 4.1
Overall faimess of police employees - 2000 5 S 12- it'-28'
7 28 3.8
19;39- _3-__ _._g. 16_-43- 3rl. - 3-9._
Visibility of police foot/vehicle patrol 2000 3 5 21 36 33 3.9
1999 1 S 20 42 29 3.9
l~nifornsofpotice foot/vet;de patrol 2600 2 2 - 17 4q 39 4.1
Decals/signs on police cars 2000 1 2 17 39 41 4.2
16 Is the level of enforcement for the following too little, just about right, or too much?
TOO JUST ABOUT TOO
LITTLE RIGHT MUCH
1 2 3
Traffic enforcement (speeding, DUI, reckless driving, etc.) 2000 15 74 11
1999 15 69 1s
Parking enforcement 2#060 7 60 33
Code enforcement (signage, abandoned vehicles, etc.) 2000 14 77 9
Do you have any comments or suggestions about Town of Vail fire or police services?
5
ANIMAL CONTROL
(Contracted from Eagle County)
17 Have you had contact with animal control within the past 12 months?
2000 1999
21 13 Yes
79 87 No [SKIP TO Q. 20]
18 Please rate your satisfaction with animal control services.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED. MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Response time to complaints 2000 17 10 24 25 24 3.3
1999 15 13 16 39 17 :3.3
Cverall quality of seRice 2090 212 1V 21- 2 2V :693° 4 37 1E9 3 J4
19 Are patrols for leash law violations too little, just right, Too JUST Too
or too much? LITTLE RIGHT MUCH
1 2 3
2000 40 25 34
1999 41 37 23
TOWN OF VAIL BUS SYSTEM AND PUBLIC PARKING
20 Have you used the TOV bus system within the past 12 months?
2000 1999
87 86 Yes
13 14 No [SKIP TO Q. 241
21 How often do you normally use the bus system?
2000
21 Frequently-almost every day
33 Often-about once a week
28 Sometimes-once a month or so
18 Rarely-less than once a month
22 Please rate your satisfaction with bus service.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Bus driver courtesy 2000 1 5 17 39 37 4.0
1999 1 5 16 35 42 4.1
Safe driving hab{is of bus driver 2000 ~ 5 17 42 7~5 1.d
Dependability of bus service 2000 1 7 19 40 33 4.0
1999 1 3 13 37 45 4.2
Cean;iress ai buses 2p^00 4 2Z 41 28 ?{&83 3 iAy 15 J~ r.T
Cleanliness of Vail Transportation 2000 2 8 22 40 27 3.8
Bus Terminal 1999 - 5 19 46 31 4.0
6
23 Do you think the frequency of the following bus services is appropriate?
TOO ABOUT NOT FREQUENT
FREQUENT RIGHT ENOUGH
1 2 3
Frequency of In-town shuttle 2000 2 66 12
eterr~q'of
2ZZ2
24 Please rate your satisfaction with public parking services in Vail.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Booth attendant courtesy 2000 4 10 23 34 24 3.7
1999 2 4 25 41 28 3.9
Speed of-tr pisaction at staffeJ exit booths 2W 11 A_. 36 17__. _ .4.
Speed of transaction at automatic exit booths 2000 6 7 21 33 33 3.6
bve'rall parcindfe_6s/prig ~g-structure 2600 2Q 1n 27P - 12 2.9
21 Z7_ AV 2.9
Cleanliness and lighting of parking structures 2000 7 16 34 29 13 3.3
1999 5 16 32 33 14 3.3
Do you have any comments or suggestions about parking in Vail?
bLBRARY
25 Do you hold a library card in the Town of Vail?
2000 1999
67 61 Yes
33 39 No
26 Have you visited, called or e•mailed the library within the past 12 months?
2000 1999
64 65 Yes
36 35 No [SKIP TO Q. 29]
27 Have you used the Community Room within the past 12 months?
2000
36 Yes
64 No
7
28 Please rate your satisfaction with.the following Vail library services and facilities.
NOT AT ALL VERY
SATISFIED SATISFIED MEAN
1 2 3 4 5
Research information 2000 1 3 18 41 37 4.1
1999 - 2 14 45 38 4.2
'rYlateriai checkout _ . ~ 1 2 - - tit , 3S 48 4s3- _
Fiction and non-fiction books 2000 1 2 22 39 37 4.1
1999 2 2 20 30 45 4.1
Magazines and nev,*iipa. 2000 1 .11 4b-,- 47 4.3
Alternate media including video and
books on tape 2000 - 2 16 42 40 4.2
1999 2 5 22 29 41 4.0
17 41- 37 4.1 -
Youth materials 2000 1 2 25 35 37 4.1
1999 4 4 21 21 50 4.1
Youth programs '?OOt? 2 t 2Y1 35 , 4.1
Is" S _18 27 4.2
Parking/ access 2000 10 14 27 27 22 3.4
1999 11 11 34 25 18 3.3
29 Over the past two years, has the sense of community within the Town improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse?
2000 1999
14 17 Improved
39 34 Stayed the same
36 41 Gotten worse
11 9 Don't know/no opinion
30 Are there any actions the Town could take to encourage you to attend Town Council meetings?
8
tl ABUT YOU
Please provide the following demographic information. Please remember that all responses remain
strictly confidential and are reported only in group format.
31 Where is your residence within the Town of Vail located?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
24 28 East Vail
4 2 Booth Falls/ Bald Mountain Road areas
I 9 Booth Creek/Aspen Lane
4 '5 Golf Course
5 14 Vail Village
3 114 Lionshead
9 7 Potato Patch, Sandstone
5 5 Buffehr Creek, Lionsridge, the Valley
3 1 Vail Commons/Safeway area
8 4 West Vail (north of 1-70)
9 6 Matterhorn, Glen Lyon
a 5 Intermountain
1) 0 3 Not a resident of the Town of Vail
7 5 Other:
32 What is your employment status?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
77 42 Employed full time
11 10 Employed part time
12 48 Not employed [SKIP TO Q. 35]
IF EMPLOYED
33 Do you work within Town of Vail boundaries?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
75 20 Yes
25 so No
34 How do you typically travel to work?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
11 9 Foot/walk
9 7 Bus
I - Bike
75 77 Car/truck
4 7 Other:
9
35 Do you have any of the following Town of Vail parking passes?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
3 - Blue Card
1 - Gold Card
9 5 Value
87 95 Do not own / no response
36 Do you own or rent your residence?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
75 96 Own
23 4 Rent
2 - Other (specify)
37 How long have you lived within the Town of Vail (or owned property if a non-resident)?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
4 4 Less than 1 year
26 19 1-5 years
32 37 6-15 years
38 40 More than 15 years
38 Do you have computer access to the Internet?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
82 87 Yes
18 13 No [SKIP TO Q. 401
39 How often do you go online?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
-70 82 Every day or almost every day
22 12 At least once a week
.4 3 Once every couple of weeks
1 1 Monthly
3 2 Rarely
40 Which of the following best describes you?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
7 7 Non-resident owner of business/commercial property [SKIP TO Q. 42]
88 6 Year-round resident (12 months/year)
5 88 Seasonal resident
41 (IF RESIDENT) Do you own or operate a business within the Town of Vail?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
27 4 Yes
73 96 No
to
o
42 Are you a registered voter in Vail?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
72 11 Yes
28 Sg No
43 which of these categories best describes your household status?
2000 2000
Residents Seasonal/2nd
37 S Single, no children
25 17 Couple, no children
22 20 (Household with children
97 54 Empty-anestteir, children no lounger at home
44 Do you have additional comments or suggestions for the Vail Town Government?
'hank you for your participation in our continuing evaluation program.
Your input is extremely important.
Dote If other adults in your household avant to complete the survey,
call toll free (888) 449-4772, ext. 200, to make arrangements for an additional survey
form.
For your information, the following e-mail and telephone numbers can be used to contact
your
Town Council or Town Manager. We invite additional comments or suggestions.
towncouncil(aki.vail.co.us
website: http://ci.vail.co.us
council 24-hour voice mail: (970) 479-1860
town manager's phone: (970) 479-2105
town manager's e-mail: mclaurin5vail.net
S*orddOcMVAUTOWNQ0001Vai1 Community Survey 2000%update.DOC
. 11
ee
e4
TOWN OF qWL
Office of the Town Manager
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2105/Fax 970-479-2157
TM
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
RE: Town Managers Report
DT: July 18, 2000
BEAVER CREEK REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Last week we received from the Beaver Creek Metro District a RFP (request for
proposals) to provide fire service to the Beaver Creek Resort. At this time neither Chief
Gulick nor I have had an opportunity to review the RFP. It is our intention to review this
in the next few weeks and be prepared to discuss it with the Council in August. If you
are interested in seeing a copy of this RFP, please let me know and I will make copies
available to you.
UPCOMING MEETING AGENDAS
07/25/00 WS - 2:00 P.M.
DRB Report/PEC Agenda and Report
Update on Information Services and Special Events
Parking Discussion
Animal Control
Discussion of Potential Changes to the REFF Ordinance
08/01/00 WS - 2:00 P.M.
Vail Resorts - Snowmaking
08/01/00 TC - 7:00 P.M.
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 15, Series 2000
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 16, Series 2000 - Amending Cable Franchise Agreement
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 17. Series 2000 - PEC Representative
2na Reading of Ordinance No. 18, Series 2000 Vail Heights Buy Down Unit.
Council Discussion of Non-Binding Special Election
lz0~~zQ RECYCLED PAPER
®
Web.-ite`of the MailCunity Chamber
,Sum'metvail.com Wintervail.com Vailchamber.:org
The .~1eb-Site is.presented in.three languages:English Spanish and German.
There are 150 million inter net users whose native language is English, 17 million .
whose. native language.is Spanish and 14 million whose native language is German.
These languages also represent the biggest guest potential for.our resort.
bleb=based,transaction have increased. at :a rate bf 800% annually.
Prom March.fst to. June 30th. our web-site experienced 54,000-Hits.
100•East.'MeadowDn-ve, #31,,;o Voljolorado:81657 ,p Telephone: 970.477.0075 Telefax:•970.416.5461
www:va lchambe.r.org
Printed an 100% recycle
, d paper
~!••Aeeu umuvn[:s+rnrx~sw,auswreaYnPAr~YFit'AGY/,nTMx:wta.aW"atn~xxsrtl~ev(tr.'ia:/rscv~'rwY+uor~Rllwdnaie.JUw•:n..+;_rva:rtrr...aw+::n,exh'e.rr:a-.NT*norrax~~:u~.r.::~.c.+?,cv...,u,:r::,,':,.. r:....:i .r.
KO (060
' . Ili
i4R~VP- ~ JiV 'r , '
English
54 .
wewa+.. kh>taairtxrr.aYavvt~rmit'rculhae': ~-.Z~+?ira~iuriaA_Y'caP+hscs~mn..•cw'atvarirrirmi~edv~n•se`d~:b.~.c'rateirnrFvsw~•r~.r•rk,r'r.~.e isd,'mraart,•n±-r.Tr.c.+.:.+,: ....a.ra~ror:xcri.,r:,~r~:.c.'~
e..
0
4 SURVEY GOVERNMENT AND THE INTERNET
IVet neighbourhoods ;
People with;interne4 access:at home, % of population
March zo0o ` u r~ to 20_.... 30 ao so
Norvday ~
t!
„2~Singapole =a''
. `~tlnit~d,5tate3
~~i~lgndt'y
~,4usttal(a ~w~- r~
r
qW,
~Ni~Zea~andp
ethe l>ai ds5 F ~ i ' ( d
~fi lfl ~s§~ ~rw 1
-3 ltzp~ Ahd ' r.
qq
5W jy t
u
t~~>man~ ~ ~ ;
nitO Arab ,
l(eland
Ilifm
Spa[~C' 4r
y' F
Pdl~tic~ r` t
~5outliAftlca4~t~ t ~,t ' , ,
u (a~ ,
fir, wJt~tf t
~ i rte yYi
r
indict e ^ apecern6 1999 Mmtmber 1999 f0dober 1999
w_ ,..~PebNerY 20011 °°1snUery 2000 EfAugult 1999
999!
S,+ ~.3•. ' • + t" Y~ . ip P;+ .t; yYd:, gig
mom
~jt ~ 11.1 . y S OJi i . •O•` 1•/. ? ? h •O• 1~ 'i+ t• •t~• ? ? Pi • •t• 1~1 ? t • • ? • •
? 't S t i i •:•'1 ~ ij:;: • J6~ 7• ? O tI ti Qt'?S' ? •••S 1~ i : i0, 1 4 J• 4 P 1~1 i .i •O•O ti:~: ti S?~i.i •S d ~1
' ~i'i'i~~ , ~ 't 11t . th ' ~ ~ fit/ ~ 1111 1. 1 11 .•;.~1++
11111, i
t
1'1~• PROCLAMATION NO. 49 2000 i.,
Tr
"a THE YEAR OF THE ROTARY CHILD HEALTH TASK
- FORCE in VAIL, COLORADO
The Vail Town Council recognizes the valuable contributions of Rotary
International, Vail/Eagle Rotary and the Western Eagle Valley Rotary Clubs in partnership with Eagle County Health and Human Services and
Early Childhood Services, Eagle Care division of Vail Valley Medical
Center, Eagle County Schools Head Start, Eagle County School District L
Child Find, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension Division, and
Catholic Charities to actively support the need for easier and better access
to health care for children.
WHEREAS, Children are our most precious resource and our hope
s,;a
for the future; and
WHEREAS, Children are dependent upon caring and nurturing tiro
• adults to help them grow and develop in positive directions; and •t•r
WHEREAS, Rotary International, and the above-mentioned
qtr,, caregivers have come together under the Rotary Foundation's Children's
' Opportunities Humanitarian Grant, to put together four child health
screenings for the year 2000 and 2001; and '~l+'•
y WHEREAS, By calling attention to the need for quality child care `
for all young children these groups hope to improve the availability of -
•het health care to as many as 400 children without health insurance; and ryas
;a WHEREAS, The above agencies have developed a program to make s child health care, access a reality for all. This project is aimed at and will
•yt
work for those at the poverty level and the working poor, as well as other
children without access to medical care. This is truly a project for the
needy in our community. This is a good beginning for children's sound
growth and development.
eP` .6••11
NOW THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Vail, State
of Colorado, does hereby designate that 2000 and 2001 are to be: The Year
'J of the Rotary Child Health Task Force in Vail, Colorado.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the
Town Seal this 18 Day of July, 2000.
a Attest:
Mayor, TownVf Vail
Town Clerk
• ' • ttr?.1~1 . 1~ 1tt ~I + I~t i' 1 r• 'f'.~ 1 • .Oit • 1 i1 ~'t: •y~~ d ..~1 • • • f 1 • 1~1 •v? 1~ ~o rIY