Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-12-12 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, December 12, 2000 NOTE: Time of items is approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. Work Session TOV Council Chambers (1:00 P.M.) VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 1. Presentation of the Vail Center Concept Paper. (1 hr.) Russell Forrest John Horan-Kates ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review the concept paper for the Vail Center and provide input on that concept. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The White River Institute was engaged to help refine the concept of a learning center and refine the overall concept for the Vail Center. A concept paper has been prepared that provides a vision for the center and a description of how life long learning can provide a unifying vision for the recreational, meeting, cultural, and community uses contemplated in the center. Staff would first like to obtain Council input on the concept and the general square footage of the uses. We anticipate that we would further refine the paper after receiving council input on December 12th. Then based on that input staff would like to review and develop a budget for the next phase of design with Council input. The goal of this discussion regarding the concept paper is to develop the final instructions for the design team. 2. 1-70 Noise Study Report. (45 mins.) Greg Hall Russell Forrest ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to the presentation, review the results, ask questions, and discuss future steps. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The 1998 Citizen Survey identified the issue of the 1-70 noise. Early this year the Town of Vail undertook a noise study that identified and quantified the noise situation along 1-70. The results of the study include the establishment of a noise model specific for Vail. A noise contour map of the Town will show the existing conditions. This model can be used to predict noise levels for any property in Vail. Future noise readings can be forecast using variables such as traffic volume, travel speed, and percentage of trucks in the traffic volume. Additionally noise mediation can be modeled to test the effectiveness of various noise mediation devices. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Listen, discuss, and determine how to proceed with this issue. 3. Right of Way Alternatives to Replace In-Town Shuttle (MK Greg Hall Centennial Engineering Analysis) (45 mins.) Mike Rose Todd Scholl ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to the presentation and review the results, ask questions and discuss future steps. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: An update to the 1993 Vail Master Transportation Study recommended a replacement of the In Town Shuttle with an Advanced Technology Solution. Current issues with the in-town shuttle are: The labor requirements; limited capacity with the current system; impacts of noise and smell; pedestrian traffic; and providing real-time wait information at each stop. The shuttle does not operate on a set schedule but varies frequently. A draft report identifying objectives, problems, possible solutions, and initial solution screening was handed out at the November 28 Council meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Listen, discuss, and outline next steps. 4. Overview of Uniform Building and Fire Codes. (1 hr.) Russell Forrest John Gulick ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review background Tom Moorhead information on the UBC (Uniform Building Code) and UFC Greg Morrison (Uniform Fire Code) Gary Goodell BACKGROUND RATIONAL: The purpose of this worksession is to respond to Council's request as part of their critical strategies to receive an overview of the UBC and UFC and to discuss appeal opportunities for applicants if they disagree with code interpretations. 5. Update on CO-Signature Policy. (30 mins.) Russell Forrest George Ruther 6. DRB/PEC Report. (5 mins.) Allison Ochs Brent Wilson 7. Review Council Critical Strategies. (15 mins.) 8. Information Update. (10 mins.) 9. Council Reports. (10 mins.) 10. Other. (10 mins.) 11. Adjournment. (5:40 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/19/00, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M., IN TOV CONCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/02/00, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS WITH A SPECIAL MEETING WITH THE VAIL LOCAL MARKETING DISTRICT TO APPROVE THE 2001 BUDGET. THE NEXT TOWN OF VAIL WALKABOUT WILL BE 1/23/00, AT 11:30 P.M. IN VAIL VILLAGE (Lunch will be at the Red Lion) Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. WHITE RIVER . r r MEMORANDUM To: Vail Town Council cc: Strategy Croup FROM.' John Horan-Kates DATE: December 8, 2000 SUBJECT: CONCEPT PAPER - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ¦¦rrrrrrrrrrrrr¦rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~ Here is the Executive Summary to the text together with a Summary Space Chart. This information represents where we are today on the overall concept refinement process. As many of you know, the complete text of the Concept Paper is largely complete, however, as part of carefully managing the public dissemination process, we're only making the summaries available this week. As the concept starts to become part of the public record, together with finalizing the financial projections, the whole document will be made available. At Tuesday's work session, several members of the Strategy Group will make a verbal presentation that expands on what is included here. While the space allocations are preliminary, they do represent a growing consensus among the people most involved in the planning to date. The high and lower ranges are recommendations for your decisions. As we move this important project forward, I would like to recommend that the Council schedule one or two specific review sessions with the key planners. These sessions would allow for an interactive dialogue on the pros and cons with those most actively involved in getting the concept to where it is today. For my part, this has been a very challenging, but rewarding process. I remain convinced that we're moving in a positive direction and that we can successfully sell The Vail Center concept. Thanks for allowing me, and the other people assembled by the White River Institute, to be involved. THE VAIL CENTER A Community Crossroads Where Learning, Recreation & Culture Meet CONCEPT PAPER Executive Summary Prepared by White River Institute 12-7-2000 THE VAIL CENTER A Community Crossroads Where Learning, Recreation & Culture Meet e~~aa~ en=cry ~ ~ eYrzig plc~ce2fesz G ,fG ~tt~cl~~t~`r`~~ $Irsw t nce a is stCZtS aitworZ.rInsrfauntarrt so ommt~ic vzrr ttng r..errealto~ xmee% ea zn an ar s 1 ~ ~ r~tslf,t~tngs c u~,c~t~sd 4UZ~i~~~; 0 ,ge~het_ v «'"g.'~ 4 tg ~~~.~`3` "x ..•!5 µ}y. ~?~C+ av..~" ~3~' THE VAIL CENTER A Community Crossroads Where Learning, Recreation & Culture Meet EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this document is to convey our recommended concept for The Vail Center. Because of the multi-faceted, complex public nature of this project, it's important to look at our approach as a point of departure for an ongoing community dialogue process that can build consensus around these ideas. BACKGROUND & KEY ASSUMPTIONS As a community, we're in mid-life. Even though we've enjoyed much success and remain one of the world's leading mountain resort communities, we've reached a plateau. As a result, we now need to foster a robust renaissance within the community and the economy. Reflecting on how a renaissance might unfold while looking beyond the surface of our success, we can understand the reasons people have come to these mountains over the years. Certainly recreation, particularly skiing and golf, but also the sheer beauty of the place. But at a deeper level, isn't it the inspiration and that sense of rejuvenation with family and loved ones that keeps us here ? Building on this notion is the essence of The Vail Center. AUDIENCES & BENEFITS A basic tenet is to design The Vail Center for ourselves first, and that if it works for locals, guests will find it valuable as well. So, what we're building is a gathering place that brings together new learning, recreational, cultural and community facilities. And over the years, the one common benefit that both locals and guests will take away from The Vail Center is some experience, some interaction that will enrich their lives. VISION & GOALS The vision outlined here attempts to respond to the question; "Where do we want to be as a community in the year 2025 T' Do we want to build our reputation and brand value or choose the same facilities and ideas that everyone else has ? One answer lies in seeking to elevate our community beyond simply being different from our competition to trying to set a new standard and reclaiming a leadership position as a mountain resort community. To do this, our concept suggests building a "learning economy" that compliments our remarkable recreational economy. At the end of this process, our primary goal is to secure a positive vote of public confidence at the polls in November 2001. CONCEPT DESCRYr i iON The Vail Center is a gathering place designed to enhance Vail's stature as a world-class mountain resort community by hosting a new level of activities and events. It brings culture and community together. In an unofficial sense, it's our campus quadrangle. It's about fun, about connecting with people and about growing. The "glue" that attempts to integrate all of the spaces and programs is learning. Perhaps with this direction, we can envision a second economic focus emerging over time. More than any other facility, The Vail Center is modeled after Banff's "centers" approach. These are not physical buildings, but rather ideas or focal points of interest that access all of the spaces on the campus. In our case, we would start with... Center fonMountain SteNNardship Center for Health & Wellness Center for Family 'Recreation Center for Leadership - Center for Conferences & Forums These centers represent some of the reasons we think people should have for coming to Vail. But the Center for Conferences & Forum is the component that attracts corporate and association groups to come for their reasons... primarily their meetings. And meetings will be the financial engine of our campus. Perhaps more than words can describe, this graphic portrays how it is all interconnected. Learning Ce.~.~.~. Village Hall Healtli( & Wellness Conference Space Leadership Center for Conferences & Forums Mountain Stev... - Ap Learning & Meeting Professional ThealrWAudttarium Library Fikass canter Su0nese Center Tech Central the Vail Cetiter Where Re-..'on and Culture Meet Sports if 11 Recreation Fun 4 Non-Profit Offices Indoor Ice Non-Profit Offices Youth Center A,,...1,..~ Cutdoar Ice Skate Park Condos Plazas STRATEGIC At r.KoACH Beyond the learning theme, our strategic approach is to look to recreation, as well as to meetings and their economic impact, to earn votes, and then to education and culture to attract donors. And because we cannot pass a public bond issue large enough for everything, we therefore need and desire components that private donors will support. To drive this, we need programming that conveys the potential and the passion of this direction. To accomplish all of this, communications will be key. The complexity of The Vail Center will require clear, simple and relevant messages tailored to each of the various audiences. And from a governance point-of-view, it will require us to create an independent coalition of individuals and organizations that partner together to get it built. Operationally, we'll strive for an integrated 'structure versus a series of fiefdoms. NEXT STEPS The timetable between now and November 2001 will fill-up quickly with further planning and design. To help in this evolving process, we're recommending an on-going dialogue with a core leadership group and community members to reach a true consensus. By striving for a new level of conversation, perhaps we can use the process itself to help build community. We've been studying this for years. Now it's time to act. In the final analysis, if we create something really special, the money will be there. Because money follows passion ! ! "We cannot solve tomorrow's problems with yesterday's answers " Albert Einstein A Community Crossroads Where Learning, Recreation & Community Meet THE MAIL CENTER SUMMARY HIGH LOWER 12/7/00 LEARNING & MEETING CONFERENCE SPACE 47000 33000 LEARNING CENTER 49850 41000 SUB TOTAL LEARNING & MEETING 9685I X4000 RECREATION 54900 X900<. CULTURE & COMMUNITY ARTS 23000 10000 RETAIL 19000 14000 OFFICES 22100 17600 HOUSING 72000 72000 SUB-TOTAL CULTURE & COMMUNITY 136iC30 1-1::3 SITE AMENITIES PARKING 180000 180000 OTHER INTERIOR PUBLIC SPACES 22028 17350 OTHER EXTERIOR PUBLIC SPACES 70500 5.5500 CIRCULATION & MECHANICAL 15% 96596 83723 SUB-TOTAL SITE AMENITIES 356525 32.5., : TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BY SCENARIO 75.:.::.:..:.::: J1 1y TOWN OF VAIL Department of Public Works & Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2158 Fax: 970-479-2166 www. ci. vail. co. us MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Greg Hall, Director of Public Works/Transportation DATE: December 8, 2000, 2000 SUBJECT: I-70 Noise Study Attached is a draft report from our consultant, Washington Infrastructure with regards to The I-70 Noise Study. An error is in the report with regards to the projected 2020 traffic volume and this will be corrected prior to Tuesdays meeting. In order to give you time and generate questions on the Noise modeling in general I did want to include this in your packet. The noise contour map will also be presented. Our consultant will be at the December 12 Council meeting to discuss this report and next steps in the study. If you should have any questions, prior to the meeting please don't hesitate to call me. RECYCLEDPAPER VIII. Noise A noise study was conducted to identify noise impacts created by the Interstate Highway 70 (I-70) in the Town of Vail. The study included the following tasks: ¦ Analyzing existing noise levels ¦ Determining noise impacts ¦ Determining future noise levels based on projected future traffic volumes ¦ Performing sensitivity analysis to differences in speed, variations of receiver locations, and increases in truck traffic The noise impacts were analyzed in accordance with the Colorado Department of Transportation's (CDOT) noise policy (CDOT Noise Analysis and Abatement Guidelines, February 1, 1995). Traffic. noise level predictions were made for two conditions: existing 2000 and year 2020. Site conditions, including horizontal and vertical layout as well as topographical and traffic information, were used as input to the STAMINA 2.0 model. General results of the traffic noise modeling effort are reported below. The results of the noise study indicate that few receivers will experience traffic noise levels in excess of CDOT's noise abatement criteria under both the existing 2000 and year 2020 traffic levels. A description of common noise terminology, a summary of CDOT's noise policy, a description of the noise modeling process and the results of the sensitivity analysis are discussed below. A. Noise Terminology Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale, which is often the source of much confusion. What humans hear are pressure fluctuations in the air that are created when something vibrates, such as an engine or the cone of a loudspeaker. The range of pressure fluctuations the human ear can detect is extremely large (20 to 20,000,000 Pascals, the metric unit of pressure). This range is unwieldy to discuss, so the decibel scale is used to compress the numbers to a more manageable form. On this scale the range of human hearing is approximately 0 dB (threshold of hearing) to 140 dB (threshold of pain). Some typical noise levels are shown in Table VIII-1. Note that these levels are in dB(A), versus dB. The "A" denotes that the noise levels have been adjusted according to the A-weighting network. The A- weighting network adjusts noise levels to correspond to the fact that the human ear is more sensitive to high frequencies than to low frequencies. A-weighted decibels are most often discussed in reference to outdoor noise situations and are used exclusively in this analysis. Outdoor noise levels are almost constantly fluctuating, particularly near a highway. The unit called the equivalent average sound level (Ley) is used to quantify the fluctuating noise level into a single number. The Ley has the same sound energy as the time-varying noise level over a stated time period (essentially the average noise level). The time period used in highway noise analysis is one hour. All TOWN OF PAIL Noise VIII-1 noise levels discussed in this report are A-weighted, hourly Leqs representing the loudest hour of traffic (Level of Service Q. Table VIII-1 Typical Noise Levels Noise Source Noise Level (dB(A)) Amplified rock band 120 Commercial jet takeoff at 61 meters (200 ft) 110 Community warning siren at 31 meters (100 ft) 100 Busy urban street 90 Construction equipment at 15 meters (50 ft) 80 Freeway traffic at 15 meters (50 ft) 70 Normal conversation at 2 meters (6 ft) 60 Typical office interior 50 Soft radio music 40 Typical residential interior 30 Typical whisper at 2 meters (6 ft) 20 Human breathing 10 Threshold of hearing 0 B. CDOT's Noise Policy For projects involving new construction, CDOT has adopted the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) guidelines for noise mitigation. These guidelines set a standard to determine when federal funds can be used for noise mitigation related to highway construction on a new location or the physical alteration of an existing highway. While this noise analysis does not involve new construction, the standards used by FHWA and CDOT are used as the criteria to determine noise impacts. The FHWA policy on noise mitigation states that noise mitigation must be considered for any receptor (e.g. a residence) or group of receptors (e.g. a neighborhood) where predicted traffic noise levels, using traffic volumes and roadway conditions projected 20 years into the future, approach or exceed the noise abatement criteria (NAC). The NAC establish the criteria to determine noise impacts on receivers. Noise abatement is only considered for highway construction on a new location or the physical alteration of an existing highway. Relevant NAC are shown in Table VIII-2. Traffic noise is considered to "approach" a criterion at a level 1 dB less than the criterion (e.g. 66 dB(A) for Category B). TOMOFNoise q vnl-z Table VIII-2 CDOT Noise Abatement Criteria Activity Category L, * (dB (A)) Description of Activity Category B 67 (Exterior) Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals. C 72 (Exterior) Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above. * Hourly A-weighted equivalent level for the noisiest hour of the day in the design year C. Noise Analysis A noise analysis was conducted using the FHWA's computerized noise prediction model, STAMINA 2.0 (using Colorado emission data). This program evaluates the noise energy produced by traffic in a segment of roadway based on the traffic volume, speed, and types of vehicles using the roadway. Site- specific horizontal and vertical conditions are also input to STAMINA in addition to traffic volume and speed data. Using existing mapping of the Interstate 70 (I-70) corridor through Vail, an XYZ-coordinate system was created. The alignment of the roadway (I-70) was translated into the XYZ-coordinate system. By inputting the alignment as XYZ-coordinates to the STAMINA noise model, the model recreates the alignment of the roadway. Noise receivers were identified along the I-70 corridor though Vail. A total of 50 receivers were identified. Each receiver was translated to the XYZ-coordinate system based on the existing mapping. The receiver coordinates were also input to the STAMINA model. The model created an electronic schematic of the I-70 corridor through Vail, including the identified receiver locations. By inputting the traffic volume, speed, and types of vehicles using the I-70 corridor, the model predicts the noise levels at each receiver location based on the receiver position from the roadway. Since the model does not take into account any obstacles between the receiver and the roadway which may prevent sound energy from reaching the receivers (e.g., buildings, vegetation, partial barriers), validation measurements were recorded in the field to determine the amount of sound energy blocked at each receiver location. The amount of sound energy that is blocked by obstacles is called the shielding factor. This shielding factor was used to calibrate the noise model. Two noise models were created. One model produces the existing year 2000 noise levels and the other model predicts the future year 2020 noise levels, based on predicted traffic growth. Both of the models \ a" d Noise V111_3 TOWN OF PAIL use average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes. Analysis of the model's sensitivity differences in speed, variations of receiver locations, and increases in truck traffic were also performed. Noise Receptors Studied The study area defined for the noise analysis is shown in Figure VIII-1. A total of 50 individual receiver sites were identified within the project area, receiver 1 (R1) though receiver 50 (R50). All of the receivers were modeled at five feet above ground elevation (representing a standing adult) and were measured at an area of outdoor activity associated with each residence. Figure VIII-1 and the figures in Appendix D show the location of the noise receivers analyzed in the study. Traffic Characteristics In order to determine the noise impacts of I-70, existing and predicted noise levels were calculated for both the 2000 existing condition and the year 2020 predicted condition. Existing 2000 traffic volumes were determined by assuming a straight-line growth pattern between 1997 AADT counts (collected by CDOT) and 2020 predicted AADT counts. Using hourly traffic counts collected by CDOT a peak hour factor of eight percent was determined. The hourly traffic counts collected by CDOT also provided an average of four percent medium trucks and seven percent heavy trucks on the roadway. The average speed used in the model was 65 miles per hour (mph). The I-70 corridor through Vail is divided into four separate segments. The segment divisions are determined by the different traffic characteristics. Table VIII-3 illustrates the traffic volumes, type of traffic, and average speeds that each of the four segments carries. The categories of traffic volume, type of traffic, and average speed were used as input to the STAMINA model in order to predict noise levels along the I-70 corridor through Vail. Table VIII-3 I-70 Segment Characteristics 2000 2020 % Average I-70 Segment AADT AADT % Medium % Heavy Passenger Speed Number (Milepost) (2-Way (2-Way Trucks Trucks Cars (mph) Traffic) Traffic) 1 (171.43-173.32) 41500 48400 4.6 4.1 91.3 65 2 (173.32-176.03) 29100 34800 4.2 6.0 89.9 65 3 (176.03-179.87) 23300 29300 4.2 7.6 88.1 65 4 (179.87-181.98) 19000 22300 4.0 9.0 87.0 65 ,%A & it Noise TOWN OF PAIL ~ V111.4 0 CD Figure VIII-1: Receiver Locations • R19 ~ I ~ R2 •R37 •aaa\ *5j~ East Vail RR2R94 ~R40 /'Rio R22 "u R32~ ! •R13 R26 - `R31 R West Vail /RRIZ . ; • R14 R -J \ ` Ra. < R77 \ I R9 R4 / R5• ~ )i,DR4 % 8• f ~i.R2 i i i Receiver locations with noise levels currently in excess of 66 dB(A) are bolded 0 D. Modeling Results A total of 50 individual receiver sites were analyzed to determine the level of noise impacts associated with the different locations along the I-70 corridor. The approximate location of each receiver is illustrated in Figure VIII-1 and Appendix D. Existing noise levels were computed to be in a range from 46.3 dB(A) at a receiver site 1,125 feet from I-70 to 74.5 dB(A) 150 feet from I-70. Future conditions were computed to be in a range from 45.7 dB(A) at a receiver site 1,125 feet from 1-70 to 74.0 dB(A) at a distance 150 feet from I-70. Table VIII-4 shows the receiver, the receiver distance from I-70, the existing noise level reading, and the 2020 predicted noise level reading. Table VIII-4 Noise Model Results Receiver Distance from Existing 2000 Noise 2020 Noise Energy Receiver Roadway (feet) Energy Levels (dB(A)) Levels (dB(A)) I R 1 15(1 679 6R.5 I I R2 530 57.9 58.6 I R3 1275 56.9 57.6 I R4 1150 52.3 53.0 I R5 540 54.9 55.6 I R6 275 59.2 59.9 R7 320 58.8 59.5 I R8 625 61.1 61.9 I R9 1000 59.3 60.1 I R10 2100 56.7 57.4 I R11 925 57.9 58.7 f R12 300 59.1 59.9 ] R13 310 55.6 56.4 , I R14 670 58.9 59.7 I R15 1475 58.1 58.8 R16 1430 57.1 57.8 R17 925 63.2 63.9 R18 150 73.2 74.0 I R19 1900 53.8 54.3 R20 1550 50.3 50.8 R21 300 67 67.4 I R22 1930 55.9 56.7 I R23 170 59.7 60.5 R24 750 56.1 56.9 R25 1200 52.3 53.1 R26 1450 50.2 51.1 R27 650 60.7 61.6 I R28 120 66.6 67.6 1 R79 6gf) c"; 7 54..2 1 R30 1080 52.5 53.4 R31 1470 51.3 52.3 1 A" At TOWN OF PAIL ~ V111-6 Noise Receiver Distance from Existing 2000 Noise 2020 Noise Energy Receiver Roadway (feet) Energy Levels (dB(A)) Levels (dB(A)) R32 1000 64.1 65.1 R33 750 51 52.0 R34 860 53.7 54.7 R35 250 55.4 56.4 I R36 550 58.8 59.8 I R37 900 593 603 R38 1100 57.5 58.5 R39 730 51.5 52.3 J I R40 770 54.1 54.9 ] R41 175 53 53.8 J R42 1125 45 45.7 J R43 580 53.9 54.6 I R44 180 52.6 53.4 R45 540 52.4 53.2 R46 1050 56.1 56.9 R47 1650 48.8 49.6 R48 628 53.1 53.9 R49 600 50.5 51.3 R50 450 59.1 59.8 Four receiver sites are found to have noise levels in excess of the noise impact criteria (for new construction). These receivers, R1, R18, R21, and R28, are currently above the 66 dB(A) noise level. Figure VIII-1 shows these receivers in bold. For the year 2020, four receiver sites were predicted to have noise levels in excess of the noise impact criteria (for new construction). These receivers, R1, R18, R21, and R28, are predicted to have noise levels above 66 dB(A) in the year 2020, based on projected traffic increases. The largest noise level increases will occur for receivers located closest to 1-70 or with the best line of sight of 1-70. However, an increase in the distance from 1-70 does not always reflect a decrease in noise level. Each receiver may have a different shielding effect based on obstacles between the receiver and the roadway, which may prevent sound energy from reaching the receivers (e.g., buildings, vegetation, and partial barriers). Table VIII-5 defines a range of noise levels for the distance from 1-70 through the Vail area for both the existing and the predicted 2020 conditions. In all cases the difference between the existing noise levels and the predicted 2020 noise levels should not be detectable to the human ear (i.e., less than 3 dB(A)) n~ Noise V111-7 TOWN OF YAIL Table VIII-5 Noise Level Ranges Based on Distance from I-70 Distance 2020 From I-70 (ft) Existing Noise Level Range Noise Level Range (dB(A)) (dB(A)) 200 52-73 53-74 400 55-67 56-68 600 50-59 51-60 800 51-61 52-62 1000 53-63 54-64 1200 45-64 45-65 1400 5F* 57* 1600 50-57 51-58 I~q0 4. 49* 2000 53-57 54-58 *only one receiver located within this distance from I-70 E. Sensitivity Analysis A sensitivity analysis was performed based on differences in speed, variations of receiver locations, and increases in truck traffic. For each category, two sensitivity runs were performed. 1. Speed The existing year 2000 noise model was altered to model the existing traffic volumes at 60 mph and 55 mph. The analysis showed that on average, an increase of 0.7 dB(A) occurs with every five-mph increase in speed. 2. Receiver Locations The existing year 2000 noise model was altered to model differing heights on each receiver. This would show how noise energy changed by level within multi-level structures. All receivers were modeled at 10 feet higher than initial elevation and 20 feet higher than the initial elevation. The analysis showed that on average, an increase of 0.04 dB(A) occurred for the first 10-foot increase in elevation and an increase of 0.002 dB(A) occurred for the second 10-foot increase in elevation. This analysis assumed that each level of a multi-level structure has the same shielding factor. In other words, each level of a multi-level structure has the same amount of sound energy blocked by obstacles (e.g., buildings, vegetation, and partial barriers). 3. Truck Traffic Increases The predicted year 2020 noise model was altered to model different percentages of truck traffic increase. The model assumed a two percent increase in truck traffic and a four percent increase in truck traffic. The analysis showed that on average, an increase of 0.3 dB(A) occurred for a two percent A" TOWN OF PAIL VIII-8 Noise increase in truck traffic and an increase of 0.6 dB(A) occurred for a four percent increase in truck traffic. 4. Traffic Volume Increases The predicted year 2020 noise model uses an AADT of 48,400 vehicles. This AADT is an estimated increase from existing AADT. A sensitivity analysis of the relative noise level increase based on increased traffic volumes was performed. Table 6 demonstrates the relative noise level increase based on traffic volumes. Table VIII-6 Relative Noise Level Increases Based on Traffic Volumes Traffic Volumes Relative Noise Level Noise Level Increase (Average Daily Traffic) (dB(A)) (per 5000 Vehicles per day) 40000 46.0 N/A 45000 46.5 0.5 50000 46.9 0.4 55000 47.4 0.4 60000 47.7 0.3 65000 48.1 I 0.3 5. "Jake Brake" Noise Truck engine compression brakes (fake brakes) are a noticeable noise contributor along some sections of westbound I-70, specifically East Vail, near Simba Run and entering Dowd Canyon. Although they raise the peak noise levels in these areas, they are not thought to make a big difference in the average noise levels. Additional measurements of peak jake brake noise levels are being done to check the impact of this noise source. F. Noise Abatement No new noise abatement was utilized in this model. A third model will be developed if needed based on the results of the existing and future condition. The third model will incorporate future conditions with noise mitigation measures in place. G. Summary The following are the results of the traffic noise impacts analysis conducted for the I-70 corridor through the Town of Vail: A14 Noise V111_9 TOWN OF PAIL • Currently, four receiver sites are found to have noise levels in excess of the noise impact criteria (for new construction). These receivers, R1, R18, R21, and R28 are currently above the 66 dB(A) noise level. • For the year 2020, four receiver sites were predicted to have noise levels in excess of the noise impact criteria (for new construction). These receivers, R1, R18, R21, and R28, are predicted to have noise levels above 66 dB(A) in the year 2020 based on projected traffic increases. • The largest noise level increases will occur for receivers located closest to I-70 or with the best line of sight of I-70. However, an increase in the distance from I-70 does not always reflect a decrease in noise level. Each receiver may have a different shielding effect based on obstacles between the receiver and the roadway, which may prevent sound energy from reaching the receivers (e.g., buildings, vegetation, and partial barriers). • An average increase of 0.7 dB(A) in noise level occurs with every five-mph increase in speed along I-70. • An average increase of 0.04 dB(A) in noise level occurred for the first 10-foot increase in elevation for each receiver and an increase of 0.002 dB(A) in noise level occurred for the second 10-foot increase in elevation for each receiver. • An average increase of 0.3 dB(A) in noise level occurred for a two percent increase in truck traffic along 1-70 and an increase of 0.6 dB(A) in noise level occurred for a four percent increase in truck traffic along 1-70. • An average increase of 0.5 dB(A) in noise level occurred for a 5000 vehicle increase in traffic volume after 40,000 vehicles. An average increase of 0.4 dB(A) in noise level occurred for a 5000 vehicle increase in traffic volume after 45,000 vehicles. An average increase of 0.4 dB(A) in noise level occurred for a 5000 vehicle increase in traffic volume after 50,000 vehicles. An average increase of 0.3 dB(A) in noise level occurred for a 5000 vehicle increase in traffic volume after 55,000 vehicles. An average increase of 0.3 dB(A) in noise level occurred for a 5000 vehicle increase in traffic volume after 60,000 vehicles. Since this noise analysis does not include highway construction on a new location or the physical alteration of an existing highway, federal funds cannot be used for noise mitigation. No new noise abatement was utilized in this model. A third model will be developed if needed based on the results of the existing and future condition. The third model will incorporate future conditions with noise mitigation measures in place. A" viii-io Noise TOWN OF PAIL ~ 4 R. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE Monday, December 11, 2000 Christmas Lunch PROJECT ORIENTATION/ -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits : 1:00 pm 1. Ford Park - 540 S. Frontage Road 2. Malone residence - 87 Rockledge Road 3. Hilb residence - 1552 Matterhorn Circle Driver: George 11*1D NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 -6-.30 p.m. Public Hearina - Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm 1. A request for a minor subdivision, to allow for the division of an unplatted tract of land into two lots, and a request for a rezoning from Residential Cluster District to Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District and a request for a variance from Section 12-6D-5, Town Code, to allow for a deviation from the required lot area and site dimensions, located at 1552 Matterhorn Circle/SW Y4 of Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81/ West of the 6m Principle Meridian. Applicant: David G. Hilb Planner: Bill Gibson 2. A request for a height variance from Section 12-6D-7, Town of Vail Code, to allow for an elevator shaft to exceed the 33' height limitation, located at 87 Rockledge Road/Lot 2, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Mary Alice Malone, represented by Resort Design Associates Planner: Allison Ochs TOWN OF PAIL 1 I 3. A request for a worksession to discuss amendments to the zoning regulations to allow for the creation of a new zone district, the "Housing Zone District." Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs 4. A request for grading in the flood plain, to allow for the placement of bridge abutments & grading, in accordance with Title 14, Town Code, located at 540 S. Frontage Rd. East/Ford Park Unplatted. Applicant; Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer Planner: Bill Gibson 5. Approval of November 27, 2000 minutes 6. Information Update The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published December 8, 2000 in the Vail Trail 2 l DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, December 6, 2000 3:00 P.M. MEETING RESULTS PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Clark Brittain Bill Pierce Hans Woldrich Melissa Greenauer Andy Blumetti SITE VISITS 2:00 pm 1. Facchini residence - 1448 Buffehr Creek Road 2. Steinmetz residence - 1157 Vail Valley Drive. 3. Ford Park pedestrian bridge - 540 S. Frontage Rd. 4. Tang residence - 185 Forest Road 5. Bell Tower Bldg. - Gore Creek Drive Driver: Brent PUBLIC HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm 1. Bell Tower Building - Addition of balconies. Brent 201 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1St Filing. Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. MacFarlan MOTION: Andy Blumetti SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0 APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant make the deck separate from the main deck. 2. That Town Council approve the encroachment over Town of Vail property. 2. Steinmetz residence - Conceptual review of an addition and remodel. Allison 1157 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 12, Block 6, Vail Village 7tn Applicant: Morter Aker Architects CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 3. Villa Valhalla - Final review of proposed improvements. Allison 365 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot K, Vail Village 5th Filing. Applicant: Gwathmey Pratt Schultz TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 20, 2000 TOWN OF YAR 1 4. Tang residence - Separation request for a new single-family residence & EHU. Ann 185 Forest Road/Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village 1s' Applicant: Fieldstone TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 20, 2000 5. Facchini residence - Conceptual review of a new single family residence. Bill 1448 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 3, Cliffside. Applicant: Carston Roth Architect CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 6. Vail Plaza Hotel West - Conceptual review of a new conference facility/hotel. Brent 13 Vail Road / Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 2. Applicant: Doramar Hotels, represented by the Daymer Corporation CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 7. Ford Park new pedestrian bridge - Final review of bridge design alternatives. Bill 540 S. Frontage Rd. East/Ford Park Unplatted. Applicant; Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer MOTION: Andy Blumetti SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0 CONSENT APPROVED Staff Approvals Sundial Townhomes - Replace sidewalks with sod. Bill 5040 Main Gore Place/Sundial Townhomes. Applicant: Nicki Viars, Slifer Management Heath residence - 4" vent with hood on outside wall. Judy 970 Vail View Drive/Lot B-6, Brooktree Townhomes. Applicant: Joel W. Heath Kenny's Double Diamond - New green awning to replace red awning. Ann 482 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Vail Lionshead Centre CO. Applicant: Kenny Friedman Red Sandstone - Antenna structure. Ann 551 N. Frontage Road West/Lot 8A, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Liberty Wirestar/AT&T Wireless Rapson residence -Deck enclosure. Ann 2572 Cortina Lane/Lot 3, Block F, Vail das Schone Filing 1. Applicant: Howard Rapson Norelli residence - Addition of windows. Allison 2625 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 11A, Block 1, Vail Village 13'h Applicant: Nancy B. & Ronald Norelli Press residence - Replace retaining wall, replace patio w/pavers, install spa. Allison 975 Fairway Drive/Lot 3, Vail Village Filing 10. Applicant: Vest Holdings Inc. 2 Perry residence - Replace shed roof, porches, heat driveway, landscape improvements. Allison 758 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch. Applicant: Anthony G. & Teressa Perry The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356,Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 3 COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS _ FOLLOWUP 11/15/00 NATURE CENTER BRIDGE GREG H.: Because snowshoeing and cross country Signs will be installed if/when the path and bridge are closed. skiing occurs regularly from the Nature Center through Diana Donovan Ford Park, it is important for the Nature Center to be informed as reconstruction of this bridge gets underway. Also, signs would be appropriate from the Nature Center access, as well as off Vail Valley Drive (BEFORE outdoor enthusiasts get stuck at the bottom!). 11/15/00 ACCESSORY BUILDING IN RUSSELL/GEORGE/TODD 0.: The VRD needs a FORD PARK building to house athletic equipment/supplies. Although the Ford Park Management Plan calls for no "above Diana Donovan ground" buildings, VRD has noted the construction of the Alpine Garden's "tool shed." What are the parameters for approval and construction of buildings in the park? 11/15/00 BRIGHT ANNIE/RUSSELL: In follow up discussions re: the JP is participating currently in a community child care task force HORIZONS/COMMUNITY future use of the Bright Horizons space, also include structured by Kathleen Forniash, Director of Health and Human ROOM/DONOVAN PARK discussion of current use of the Community Room at Services for Eagle County. The next meeting is scheduled for Dec. the Library, as well as the pavilion in Donovan Park, to 15"'. Bright Horizons, as a topic, has been part of this forum. Diana Donovan make certain no duplication of facilities occur. Follow-up therefore, this discussion will be rescheduled for January 16, 2001. w/major employer in the area, as well as Martha Peck, by 12/15/00 to learn whether a subsidized infant-to-2 years program can be implemented in this space. 9/19/00 CREATION OF MAYOR'S LUDWIG: Determine whether a Mayor's Advisory December S, 2000, Page 1 ADVISORY GROUP Group might be the appropriate forum to move forward f through the community outcomes re: youth concerns Sybill Navas (e.g., Fourth of July, New Year's Eve, etc.) as confirmed through the White River Institute's most recent graduating class's sponsorship of the county- wide forum on alcohol/substance abuse. 10103/00 CMC MILL LEVY TOM: Can the Town of Vail opt out of this special district? What would be required? Greg Moffet 11107100 VRD MILL LEVY TOM: What would be required to transfer the VRD's current mill levy back to the Town of Vail? Greg Moffet 11107100 VRD STAFF ONLY DESIGNATED BOB: From the actual "user group" perspective, is it PARKING appropriate to have 12 Staff-Only Designated Parking spaces set aside directly in front of the VRD offices? Rod Slifer 10/24100 Lionshead Walkabout LARRY PARDEE/LORELEI: Provide more trash All of Concert Hall Plaza is private property starting from the stairs on CONCERT HALL PLAZA containers. Remove PUBLIC NOTICE sign from La the west side at the bus stop through to the stairs on the east side at Plata jewelers location. the bottom across from the General Store. At what locations is Council asking to put trash containers in the Concert Hall areas. 10124/00 Lionshead Walkabout MARRIOTT PAM: Repair east end of parking structure fence at the PARKING STRUCTURE FENCE Marriott. Call Marriott. Bob Lazier 10124/00 LionsHead Walkabout GREG M./JOE R./LARRY PARDEE/GREG H.: Per David Rhodes went to this area to check on a complaint of lighted ski MATTERHORN ISSUES Sally Jackal - she resides at 1672 Matterhorn Drive. To jumps being used. Not seeing anything from the street he went up to Sally Jackal the east and to the back of her home are 2 TOV lights 1706 Geneva Drive and pulled into the driveway as it goes back to (apparently they "light" a night-skiing jump?). the rest of all the neighboring buildings. He could then see where - also in the immediate area, there is a small, black several snow-built jumps had been built and several "rails" made from derelict car that has been in the same location for over pine logs were also erected in the area. A tenant of 1706 then December 8, 2000, Page 2 a year. Can/has it been ticketed so it can be towed? flagged David down (he actually threw a snowball at David's windshield from his second floor apartment) and asked him if we could do something about the lights. He didn't mind them snowboarding back there as is seemed to keep them busy and out of trouble. The lights are a mercury vapor light and are attached to aspen trees and then powered by extension cords from the nearby residence (they are under snow). David thinks they come from 1682 Matterhorn Circle. David doesn't know that the recreational aspect of this is illegal but needs answers from George Ruther or another planner regarding the lights and possibly the man-made pine log "rail". The lighting is temporary, not down lighting and not shielded. Rhodes has pictures of the area for anyone wanting to see them. 10/24/00 Lionshead Walkabout GREG H./LARRY PARDEE: Is the Bald Mountain Road CDOT has been contacted and reminded this is their responsibility BALD MOUNTAIN ROAD FENCE overpass fence fixed? per our maintenance agreement. Sybill Navas 11/28/00 WEST VAIL SIGN CODE (West RUSSELL: There is a need to overhaul the West Vail FOLLOW UP: Russ will report back to Council at the 1/2/00 work Vail Walkabout) sign code in order to allow greater visibility for these session. (Dec. 12th and 19th worksessions are filled up.) retail businesses. Retail diversity should also be Council explored. 11/28/00 WEST VAIL CLEANLINESS (West RUSSELL: There is a need for additional cleanliness We can address nuisances (under current code) but we cannot Vail Walkabout) efforts on private property. require the sweeping of parking lots. Council 11/28/00 IMPROVED TOWNWIDE RUSSELL: There is a need for town-wide pick up of RECYCLING (West Vail Walkabout) recycled waste (both public and private). Council December 8, 2000, Page 3 11/28100 UNFUNDED CAPITAL RUSS/BOB/GREG H.: Include unfunded capital That list has been appended to the critical strategies and the Five PROJECTS projects to the options for public improvements Year Capital Projects Budget. associated with the LionsHead Master Plan. Chuck Ogilby 11/28/00 OPEN SPACE PARCELS RUSS/STEVE: Prepare a comprehensive inventory of With Chris Stouder leaving in December, staff will not be able to the town's open space parcels, to include how they address this until after the year end audit is finished in the 2nd quarter Diana Donovan were acquired (RETT vs. general fund). in 2001. 12/05/00 MODIFY ORDER OF BUSINESS PAM: A copy of the ordinance setting the order of business for Council at Regular and Special Meetings Diana Donovan is attached to the Council Follow Up sheet for your consideration. 12/05/00 EVIAN COOLER RUSSELL/GREG M.: An Evian cooler is parked outside the former location in LionsHead at the Gondola Kevin Foley Building of the Beaver Tail. Is this an illegal outdoor display? 12/05/00 REALLOCATING EMPTY ANNIE/RUSSELL: Should empty spaces in the lot be The spaces are all assigned and are used. SPACES AT THE MUD LOT reallocated to the Vail Valley Medical Center to help take the load off the hospital's parking demands? Kevin Kevin Foley also noted there were numerous empty spaces available at this time in the hospital's parking structure. 12/05/00 USE OF MAG CHLORIDE GREG H./LARRY PARDEE: The use of magnesium We are training new drivers. Accidentally, the wrong switch was hit chloride in West Vail was noted last weekend when the and we made a mistake. Kevin Foley weather was sunny. 12/05/00 WRITTEN AGREEMENT WNRD BOB/TOM: Prepare agreement. RE: PUBLIC SKATING ICE TIME Diana Donovan December 8, 2000, Page 4 12/05/00 EMPLOYEE HOUSING TOM: Chuck requested the town attorney review these GUIDELINES guidelines to determine if a more restrictive passage contained in an earlier version of the guidelines could Chuck Ogilby be considered, given the Colorado Supreme Court decision that struck down a Telluride housing policy citing evidence of rent-control, this occurring in preparation for a Council's discussion in January. 11/28/00 HANDICAPPED PARKING _ FORREST/GOODELL: Please supply a clarification on SPACES AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN what the requirements are for handicapped parking PARKING LOTS spaces, as well as why landscape islands are required in parking lots? Sybill Navas 11/28/00 NORDIC TRACK AT GOLF BOB: Bob will contact VRD to inquire if the district's Sybill suggested the track could possibly be re-located to the former COURSE emphasis on golf is causing other uses to be neglected, Par 3 site in East Vail. Bob will discuss with Piet Peters while reviewing the lease agreement between the TOV Chuck Ogilby and VRD. December 8, 2000, Page 5 1-5-10 1-5-11 Clerk an oath or affirmation that he/she will 2. With respect to a special meeting • support the Constitution of the United which is called, in addition to the re- States, and constitution of the State of quirements of section 4.2 of the Town Colorado, the Charter and the ordinances of Charter, the Town Council will en- this Town and will faithfully perform the deavor to have a legal notice of the duties of the office. (Charter(1972) § 3.10) meeting published once preceding the date of the meeting; provided, howev- er, that the publication shall not be 1-5-11: REGULAR AND SPECIAL required in the absence of adequate COUNCIL MEETINGS': time therefor or may be dispensed with for other good cause. A. Regular Meetings: • C. 'Order Of Business: In regular and 1. Time And Place: The Council shall special meetings of the Town Council meet regularly at least twice monthly the order of business shall be as fol- at a day and hour to be fixed by the lows: rules of the Council. The meeting time shall be established at the Town 1. Call to order by the Mayor. Council's first organizational meeting to be held within seven (7) days from 2. Determination of quorum. the election as described in Section 1-5-3 of this Chapter. 3. Citizen participation. 2. Deferment: In the event a regular 4. Consent agenda including minutes meeting pursuant to subsection Al of of preceding meetings. this Section would `fall on a legal holi- day recognized by the Town or a reg- 5. Consideration of ordinances, reso- ular meeting cannot for good reason lutions, and motions. be held by the Town Council on a regular meeting date, the regular 6. Consideration of other matters on meeting shall automatically be held on the agenda. the next secular day at the same time and place; provided, however, that for 7. Reports from Town Manager and good cause the Council at a regular Town Attorney. meeting preceding the regular meeting which will be deferred may defer the 8. Statements, observations, and regular meeting to a subsequent date inquiries by the Mayor and not later than one week after the de- Councilmembers. • ferred regular meeting date. 9. Concluding statement by the May- B. Notice: or. 1. This Section constitutes notice of 10. Adjournment. regular meetings to be held pursuant to subsection A hereof and no other D. Purpose Of Meetings: Regular and notice shall be required. special meetings of the Town Council 1. See also Town Charter art. IV. 1298 ' Town of Vail s - I: uJS (d~~•00 42-4-111 Vehicles and Traffic110 u I i j ''a 1 f (II) If any violation described in subpara, (e) Designating particular highways or ~rg 4 graph (I) of this paragraph (b) occurs within q roadways for use by traffic moving in one direc- school zone, as defined in section 42-4-615, the tion, consistent with the provisions of this article; ` y t~! maximum penalty that may be imposed shall be (f) Designating any highway as a through a •n doubled. highway or designating any intersection as a 4.5 If the state, a count a city and count stop or field intersection, consistent with the r or a municipality detects a violation under a provisions of this article; " s : • municipal traffic regulation or under state law Designating truck routes and restricting for disobedience to a traffic control device the use of highways, consistent with the provi- ; i through the use of an automated vehicle identi- sions of this article; i•. I fication system, the maximum penalty that the (h) Regulating the operation of bicycles and d LIII ` state, a county, a city and county, or a municipal- requiring the registration and licensing of same, ity may impose for such violation, including any including the requirement of a registration fee, surcharge, is seventy-five dollars. consistent with the provisions of this article; (5) If the state, a county, a city and county, or (i) Altering or establishing speed limits, con- j; a municipality has established an automated sistent with the provisions of this article; vehicle identification system for the enforce- (j) Establishing speed limits for vehicles in 5 ment of municipal traffic regulations or state public parks, consistent with the provisions of traffic laws, then no portion of any fine collected this article;i E ; through the use of such system may be paid to (k) Determining and designating streets, the manufacturer or vendor of the automated parts of streets, or specific lanes thereon upon ; vehicle identification system equipment. The which vehicular traffic shall proceed in one Ij compensation paid by the state, county, city and direction during one period and the opposite II• ! if ii county, or municipality for such equipment shall direction during another period of the day, con- be based upon the value of such equipment and sistent with the provisions of this article; may not be based upon the number of traffic (1) Regulating or prohibiting the turning of citations issued or the revenue generated by vehicles, consistent with the provisions of this i( such equipment, article; (6) As used in this section, the term "auto- (m) Designating no-passing zones, consis- mated vehicle identification system" means a tent with the provisions of this article; system whereby: (n) Prohibiting or regulating the use of con- (a) A machine is used to automatically trolled-access roadways by nonmotorized traffic detect a violation of a traffic regulation and or other kinds of traffic, consistent with the pro- simultaneously record a photograph of the vehi- visions of this article; cle, the operator of the vehicle, and the license (o) Establishing minimum speed limits, con- plate of the vehicle; and sistent with the provisions of this article; (b) A penalty assessment notice or sum- (p) Designating hazardous railroad cross- j mons and complaint is issued to the registered ings, consistent with the provisions of this article; owner of the motor vehicle. (q) Designating and regulating traffic on r play streets, consistent with the provisions of this 3 42-4-111. Powers of local authorities. (1) The provisions of this article shall not be article; x (r) Prohibiting or restricting pedestrian deemed to prevent local authorities, with respect s crossing, consistent with the provisions of this i ,I to streets and highways under their jurisdiction article; s I and within the reasonable exercise of the police 41 I.I power, except those streets and highways which (s) Regulating the movement of traffic at are parts of the state highway system which are school crossings by official traffic control devices t subject to the provisions of section 43-2-135, or by duly authorized school crossing guards, ii consistent with the provisions of this article; C.R.S., from: i (t) Regulating persons propelling push j (a) Regulating or prohibiting the stopping, ; standing, or parking of vehicles, consistent with carts; -r the provisions of this article; (u) Regulating persons upon skates, coast- ers, sleds, or similar devices, consistent with the (b) Establishing parking meter zones where provisions of this article; it is determined upon the basis of an engineering (v) Adopting such temporary or experimen- 1 'I and traffic investigation that the installation and tal regulations as may be necessary to cover c operation of parking meters is necessary to aid l! Y emergencies or special conditions; in the regulation and control of the parking of (w) Adopting such other traffic regulations yt vehicles during the hours and on the days speci- as are provided for by this article; T ` fled on parking meter signs; (x) Closing a street or portion thereof tem- f (c) Regulating traffic by means of police porarily and establishing appropriate detours or officers or official traffic control devices, consis- tent with the provisions of this article; an alternative routing for the traffic affected, (d) Regulating or prohibiting processions or consistent with the provisions of this article; 41j assemblages on the highways, consistent with the (Y) Regulating the local movement of traffic %w provisions of this article; or the use of local streets where such is not pro- vided for in this article; - ~I,I 111 Regulation of Vehicles and Traffic 42-4-201 h i << i:i~v i? (z) Regulating the operation of motorized 42-4-113. Appropriations for administration bicycles, consistent with the provisions of this of article. The general assembly shall make! E article; except that local authorities shall be appropriations from the highway users tax fund Prohibited from establishing any requirements for the expenses of the administration of this i. !j. for the registration and licensing of motorized article. i. a;. bicycles; (aa) Authorizing and regulating the opera= 42-4-114. Removal of traffic hazards. (1) The department of transportation and local u i;i!!{ tion of neighborhood electric vehicles on streets i Igli:?. authorities, within their respective jurisdictions, ghwaYs under their jurisdiction by resolu- and hi j. may by written notice sent by certified mail G`14, lion or ordinance of the governing body, if such regulation is consistent with the provisions of require the owner of real property abutting on h the right-of-way of any highway, sidewalk, or this title; except that: „ i j other public way to trim or remove, at the (I) Local authorities are prohibited from j establishing any requirements for the registra- expense of said property owner, any tree limb or ! tion and licensing of neighborhood electric vehi- any shrub, vine, hedge, or other plant which pro- E jects beyond the property line of such owner I!.r; cles; and onto or over the public right-of-way and thereby (II) Local authorities are prohibited from obstructs the view of traffic, obscures an traffic {u authorizing the operation of neighborhood elec- control device, or otherwise constitutes hazard y I i' tric vehicles on limited access highways. f h 2 No ordinance or regulation enacted to drivers or pedestrians, I i'•, O ~I under paragraph (a), (b), (e), , x), y), r (k), (2) , duty of overhanging owner to (1), (m), (n), (o), (p), (q), (r), (vv)), (x), (y), o or (aa) remove It located on an is the the dead, of such pro boughs erty of trees owner i+ 1 of subsection (1) of this section shall be effective until official signs or other traffic control devices that endanger life or property on the public right-of-way. l lI lit," conforming to standards as required by section jl!`" i; (3) In the event that any property owner 42-4-602 and giving notice of such local traffic I ' regulations are placed upon or at the entrances fails or neglects to trim or remove any such tree Z tl~;! to the highway or part thereof affected as may limb or any such shrub, vine, hedge, or other be most appropriate. plant within ten days after receipt of written j t,l 'i notice from said department or concerned local (3) (a) A board of county commissioners j may by resolution authorize the use of designat- authority to do so, said department or local q llj~stl 't authority may do or cause to be done the neces- ed portions of unimproved county roads within sar work incident thereto, and said i a the unincorporated portion of the count for y property motor vehicles particiating in timed endurance owner shall reimburse the state or local authori- l f4f ~ events and for such purposes shall make such tY for the cost of the work performed. A regulations relating to the use of such roads and PART 2 i the operation of vehicles as are consistent with -public safety in the conduct of such event and 1 with the cooperation of county law enforcement EQUIPMENT officials. (b) Such. resolution by a board of county 42-4-201. Obstruction of view or driving Ill 1141.` commissioners and regulations based thereon mechanism hazardous situation. (1) No per-A{I.i!?{' f;~ i,ll? ; shall designate the specific route which may be son shall drive a vehicle when it is so loaded or used in such event, the time limitations imposed when there are in the front seat such number of upon such use, any necessary restrictions in the persons, exceeding three, as to obstruct the view use of such route by persons not participating in of the driver to the front or sides of the vehicle such event, special regulations concerning the or as to interfere with the driver's control over 7r ( 1 operation of vehicles while participating in such the driving mechanism of the vehicle. event in which case any provisions of this article (2) No person shall knowingly drive a vehi- r 4 to the contrary shall not apply to such event, and cle while any passenger therein is riding in any 4iili such requirements concerning the sponsorship manner which endangers the safety of such pas- of any such event as may be reasonably neces- senger or others. ~1 J~i 1 + ill sary to assure adequate responsibility therefor. (3) No person shall drive any motor vehicle r 42-4-112. Noninterference with the rights of equipped with any television viewer, screen, or {ii'i` ( } j owners of realty. Subject to the exception pro other means of visually receiving a television broadcast which is located in the motor vehicle vided in section 42-4-103 (2), nothing in this arti- at any point forward of the back of the driver's cle shall be construed to preverit the owner of seat or which is visible to the driver while o er- "I + 1; real property used by the public for purposes of pf vehicular travel by permission of the owner and ating the motor vehicle. The provisions of this ~a not as matter of right from such use, subsection (3) shalt not be interpreted to prohib- f+ ! ' w $ ti < y~.. prohibiting it the usage of any computer, data terminal, or or from requiring other or different or addition- y „ other similar device in a motor vehicle. al conditions than those specified in this article, i ~I ~ (4) No vehicle shall be operated upon any s or from otherwise regulating such use as may highway unless the driver's vision through any seem best to such owner. required glass equipment is normal and unob- i1H structed. ' t yf ~ i S =r ^f r 'r 107 Regulation of Vehicles and Traffic 42-4-110 j! streets and highways within incorporated cities and shall be subject to all of the duties applica- and towns, shall be subject to local ordinances ble to the driver of a vehicle by this article, regulating the operation of motorized bicycles as except those provisions of this article which by provided in section 42-4-111. Whenever the their very nature can have no application. word "vehicle" is used in any of the driving rules (11) Where suitable bike paths, horseback set forth in this article that are applicable to trails, or other trails have been established on motorized bicycle riders, such term shall include the right-of-way or parallel to and within one- motorized bicycles. fourth mile of the right-of-way of heavily trav- (2) A person riding a motorized bicycle eled streets and highways, the department of PF4 shall not ride other than upon or astride a per- transportation may, subject to the provisions of manent and regular seat attached thereto. section 43-2-135, C.R.S., by resolution or order `W (3) No motorized bicycle shall be used to entered in its minutes, and local authorities may, T;I carry more persons at one time than the number where suitable bike paths, horseback trails, or for which it is designed and equipped. other trails have been established on the right-yi!Ij1 (4) No person riding upon any motorized of-way or parallel to it within four hundred fifty bicycle, coaster, roller skates, sled, or toy vehicle feet of the right-of-wav of heavily traveled ls'. shall attach the same or himself or herself to any streets, by ordinance, determine and designate, y vehicle upon a roadway. upon the basis of an engineering and traffic (5) Every person operating a motorized investigation, those heavily traveled streets and bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as close to the highways upon which shall be prohibited any a'. right side of the roadway as practicable, exercis- bicycle, animal rider, animal-drawn conveyance, ``T, ing due care when passing a standing vehicle or or other class or kind of nonmotorized traffic ! one proceeding in the same direction. which is found to be incompatible with the nor- (6) Persons riding motorized bicycles upon mal and safe movement of traffic, and, upon such a roadway shall not ride more than two abreast a determination, the department of transporta-' klf except on lanes or parts of roadways set aside tion or local authority shall erect appropriate for the exclusive use of bicycles. official signs giving notice thereof; except that (7) For the sake of uniformity and bicycle with respect to controlled access highways the z,'I and motorized bicycle safety throughout the provisions of section 42-4-1010 (3) shall apply. a+bpi ! state, the department in cooperation with the When such official signs are so erected, no per- dePartment of transportation shalt prepare and son shall violate any of the instructions con- !~,a make available to all local jurisdictions for dis- tained thereon." tribution to bicycle and motorized bicycle riders (12) The parent of any child or guardian of Cll therein a digest of state regulations explaining any ward shall not authorize or knowingly per- and illustrating the rules of the road, equipment mit any child or ward to violate any provision of requirements, and traffic control devices that are this section. tS applicable to such riders and their bicycles or (13) Any person who violates any provision y!h motorized bicycles. Local authorities may sup- of this section commits a class B traffic infraction. E element this digest with a leaflet describing any additional regulations of a local nature that are 42-4-109.5. Neighborhood electric vehicles. (1) Except as provided in section 42-4-111 (1) ~I.•'j c applicable within their respective jurisdictions. (8) Persons riding or leading animals on or (aa), no person shall operate a neighborhood along any highway shall ride or lead such ani- electric vehicle on a highway, r •:I mals on the left side of said highway, facing (2) No person shall operate a neighborhood approaching traffic. This shall not apply to per- electric vehicle on a limited access highway. sons driving herds of animals along highways. (3) Any person who violates any provision (9) No person shall use the highways for of subsection (1) or (2) of this section commits a traveling on skis, toboggans, coasting sleds, class B traffic infraction. ~skates, or similar devices. It is unlawful for any (4) The department of revenue shall notl F. person to use any roadway of this state as a sled register or issue title for a neighborhood electric 5I i vehicle until after such time as the federal or ski course for the purpose of coasting on sleds, skis, or similar devices. It is also unlawful department of transportation through the for any person upon roller skates or riding in or national highway transportation safety adminis- tration has adopted a federal motor vehicle safe- by means of any coaster, toy vehicle, or similar 3•~;rj~ • device to go upon any roadway except while ty standard for such vehicles. crossing a highway in a crosswalk, and when so g 42-4-110. Provisions uniform throuhout,,y,il crossing such person shall be granted all of the state. (1) The provisions of this article shall ? ! " rights and shall be subject to all of the duties be applicable and uniform throughout this state applicable to pedestrians. This subsection (9) and in all political subdivisions and municipali- {ilf`r. does not apply to any public way which is set ties therein. Cities and counties, incorporated U. z t aside by proper authority as a play street and cities and towns, and counties shall regulate and which is adequately roped off or otherwise enforce all traffic and parking restrictions on marked for such purpose. streets which are state highways as provided in (10) Every person riding or leading an ani- section 43-2-135 (1) (g), C.R.S., and all local 4 it' .t r mal or driving any animal-drawn conveyance authorities may enact and enforce traffic regula 1E., upon a roadway shall be granted all of the rights tions on other roads and streets within their f la w«a~, ril M, AM (d)S l d S 00 ~~iKt. ~ d ~ Number of Calls to Advocates 1999 (Where Caller lives) JAN FEB MAR APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC AVON 5 2 5 8 4 3 3 4 0 6 1 0 B.CREEK 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Basalt 1 BOND 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 BOULDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 Carbondale 2 CELL PHOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 DENVER 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 EAGLE 0 3 6 6 1 0 1 3 0 2 1 0 Eagle Vail 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 EDWARDS 4 4 4 17 0 6 0 4 0 0 1 0 GYPSUM 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 McCOY 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 MINTURN 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 REDCLIFF 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SWEETWA 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OUT/AREA 2 0 3 3 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 VAIL 9 4 2 13 2 2 7 3 7 6 8 4 OTHER Monument 1 Rifle 1 TOTALS AVON 41 B.CREEK 1 BASALT 1 BOND 2 BOULDER 3 CARBONDAL 2 CELL PHONE 2 DENVER 9 EAGLE 23 EAGLE VAIL 7 EDWARDS 39 GYPSUM 14 McCOY 4 MINTURN 4 REDCLIFF 3 SWEETWAT 2 OUT/AREA 14 VAIL 67 OTHER 2 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, December 5, 2000 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 6:30 P.M. VAIL LOCAL MARKETING DISTRICT Special Meeting with the Vail Local Marketing District Board of Directors to Approve Y2001 Budget by Approving Resolution 1, Series of 2000 (30 mins.) 7:00 P.M. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. (5 mins.) 2. Consent Agenda. (5 mins.) • The approval of the November 7th and 21St meeting minutes. 3. Second Reading of the Model Traffic Code Ordinance No. 11, Series 2000. Tom Moorhead (30 mins.) Greg Hall Greg Morrison ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2000, on second reading. BACKGROUND: In 1978 the Town of Vail adopted the Model Traffic Code, 1977 edition for the regulation of traffic within the Town of Vail. That Model Traffic Code was revised by the Colorado Department of Transportation in 1995. The Model Traffic Code intends to promote uniformity between the states traffic laws and municipal traffic codes. The model traffic code establishes speed limits for both residential and commercial streets and roads. The model traffic code establishes speed limits of 25 mph in any business district and 30 mph in any residence district. In order to change the Town's speed limits from what the code establishes, it has been necessary to do site specific speed studies. The Town of Vail has conducted these studies and the results are reflected in exhibit A which is attached to the ordinance. Exhibit A, recommends specific speed limits in our residential and business area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 11, Series 2000, an ordinance adopting the model traffic code. 4. ORDINANCE NO. 26, Series of 2000 Allison Ochs AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN CODE, TITLE 12, CHAPTER 22, SECTION 4, ADOPTION OF VIEW CORRIDORS, BY ADDING ONE VIEW CORRIDOR IN LIONSHEAD AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. (5 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Table second reading of Ordinance No. 26, Series of 2000, to the December 19, 2000, Town Council meeting. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: At the November 21, 2000, meeting, the Council requested that staff notify individual owners within Lionshead Center of the adoption of the View Corridor. To complete this task, staff is requesting additional time prior to second reading of the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council table Ordinance No. 26, Series of 2000, on second reading to the December 19, 2000, Town Council meeting. 5. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2000 - Setting the Mill Levy Steve Thompson (15 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2000 of second reading. BACKGROUND RATIONAL: The Town Council must set the mill levy for the next fiscal year and certify to the County Commissioners by December 15, 2000. Since the de-Brucing of the Property Tax passed last week the Town Council can assess a base mill levy of 4.69 mills without a mill levy credit. If that is done the Town will collect an additional $225,779, over what is currently budgeted if the assessed valuation does not change in early December. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Town Council approve Ordinance no. 29, Series of 2000, on second reading. 6. First Reading of Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2000 - Amendment to employee Steve Thompson pension. (5 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2000, on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONAL: Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2000 deletes Section 7.12 which allowed hardship distributions and amends Section 5.5 allowing a participant who becomes totally disabled to be 100% vested. Hardship distributions are not allowed in money purchase plans. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 30, Series 2000, amendment to employee pension. 7. First Reading of Ordinance No. 31, Series of 2000 - Amendment to Fire Steve Thompson and Police Pension. (5 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 31, Series of 2000, on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Ordinance No. 31, Series of 2000 deletes Section 7.12 which allowed hardship distributions. Hardship distributions are not allowed in money purchase plans. A vote by the police and fire employees will be needed to change Section 5.5 allowing 100% vesting upon total disability. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 31, Series 2000, amendment to fire and police pension. 8. First Reading of Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2000 - Supplemental No. 5. Steve Thompson (10 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2000, on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE Please see the enclosed schedule of proposed supplemental appropriations and adjustments to support supplemental appropriation number 5 of 2000. A supplemental appropriation of $529,689 is requested of which $110,774 is funded by revenues and the balance of $418,915 coming from fund balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 32, Series 2000, Supplement No. 5. 9. First reading of Ordinance No.33, Series of 2000, an ordinance George Ruther amending the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map and rezoning Lot 4, Vail Village West Filing No.2 from Residential Cluster zone district to -General Use zone district; and setting forth details in regard thereto. (15 mins.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No.33, Series of 2000, on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail is currently in the process of preparing plans for the development of Donovan Park. A small tract of land (Lot 4, Vail Village West Filing No. 2) on the westernmost end of the park site is zoned Residential Cluster district. The remaining area of the park is zoned more appropriately as General Use district. Staff believes that since the intent of the park development is to provide recreational amenities and facilities to the community and it is not to provide residential uses on the site, that Lot 4 should be rezoned to General Use district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council approve Ordinance No.33, Series of 2000, on first reading. 10. Town Manager's Report. (5 mins.) Bob McLaurin 11. Adjournment ( 8:40 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY,12/12/00, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/19/00, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12119/00, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. CAAGENDA.TC ^ I' J i` AN1LEns . . i . ~ I)ODGE, Jl J Mp1•ipA11EROS S1II LION , I ~ 1, ~ r f , ~ j. ` , 1 CCD > FRA~wa~ " 4 ~,~1Es -M,A.s2MR P TO a } sort D-TO'1 TyeICAL I o I I T R~ E y L p P M El`1 T ~3 OVSL Co" I 0 mum 3: 1c: • - v-~Itv v,~ P~ ^2~ ~w y ^t ~3~ d 'fir, t... ,•i. :,:~I;.1'{. - - (.(j~`~(~ - t , sox CD s,rrYt-r"- - tl, s rte' _ ,ry s'"'-,-"._. 7, .i, ' rraf a^:.~;':'I',r•=37"• ;C'ttJ`~.'t«f >`..y-z~::~ ;Jr_- 4',..~....'.,'pt E: ~ • t _ . ,e n -wa ,c-...,. ,-ate- - " : - - - - vs?x"i'i ' . t ^c.-.1•:.h.2.. _ ?i' - +z,....~-E.,~<_',~1'r ` _ _ - •.zv':,°r: is 22 .•r.~,c rt ,'.r'-"•( 6C• own INN $ Y . rJ'.: - x x. ,fit, ,~r• f4 { W, n~ r c -...r., w,. _ _,..r .r _ _ •'D; 3.t ,^'1. - - ~.rl .,r 3.~i~.. i - v. _ sr t a- - »C'.•:-,..L~ > t „ - ,J'~t'rt,. _ •i s..., ..d`.~~: L „3. e7 ..E ,µ.,N~~.° t.,Y.'%:~; x;'oi;.„ .~:SY-r`., v.Y-..G, •L.~„ C/~C Py r, tr'v:,• .r'-'- ~I.1-..... - _,,;:5 ;':e. .tl".ss,T<>,..'.., .x t3_• nr, F•i . - _,.u-.. .a-.>n.. `x.c.-r...::.t'.. _ 'rE - "•-:t. - _ _ =~~.:'^s.~' k'l~^'.'n.. _ _ ~ . _ , _ . r.+s.1-,.. L,•,.F_ ,7,i...,:., .'a-.. '.1 > ~Y~~- 4.r'," - r1.+~1' »?~+tF~' v onion ,...r :T' 's ..,":t: •'f:_ _ f. ?Yk'LS'=..'~~._ . fit. ~;TSm~. 3. _ ' - - :6:g - ~•'~a" • - S° ',i!•=b.u 9^~ ` -,fit` ~ A. ga J ~-k ..r _ il::`t''j_:.::F"`".e;..also.: ^"'~;.*.i. ~:,f.,i,::4~•' 'w :wwti~:' S J 1. :_t_:: ..-r._.a-k _ 5.-t? : t,. :f :-r ..t,v.=. '%Iti %et~~..::. -YY° rA'~•~L r.. ~ .,a . .r.. >_>-.''r:-'-,a.._~~ 4. _ «t. ~,.a,,,, 1•, Ste. ~{{F-. ry - - .^ad. _ _ _ 't'i•-L`-'-Shy i .a~" ~.'1-s`." tea _ ~-...~.:Er _,.:..~...r.:.:Y:•.a_ _ . -r "S v:rk 4'. = +:~t~ti~L• J... 1 • _ - ..r .:.„..•.r•art: .r v.4.k]9.• x, •5,,.,w -lwvs<- "aft . I , ss , 1! .r. . a . n ~3 .c •.t-a L ^ -'i 3 / a •Sr Y`.'1'f EN . r^,.. 7 wag k - ~ t :j: r , - ; y' 'r: t •;-,tom'. _ .-3. - d3~ 1.:., c 1= 45 - - t t r'. ; f- ,--Y h I.'• i AMR L _ - - est.,, pr t , I Tr~1 MAP EXISTING PROPER ""?-->_..?•._,-_;,;J; 1 I " :cL`,'_~^t .:i; i:'- ..t _ J,~. ..;e•: 1"llr , I J, - _ ~ ~ TOWN OF VA Q. PROPERTY 1-::.•:. : ff VAIL ASSOCIATES PROPERTY . PRIVATE PROPERTY - - UONSHEAT _ _ - REDEVELOPMENT M A. S I E -I DESIGNWORRSNOPILD! L J lmum ~ct " J r - r.ea.'srr mss. n 1.L ytj~ 'got „t 2 7a' 74 Zy 1 e 1 I it 6) z - p~~ 1 i l to7. 25' q$ l 0 p-~ } - N • - r ~ - I ~ nsv. J 1 / ft'0 ; all } - ~ , 1 11 ~ 11 1 I ~ I I L`r 11 11 II Il III I #.WOOD I 11 ' 1 ' i • 1'O `q, FRITZLEN PIERCE p c aYi •.crlr.ert U • . ~ r 1yOR7N • I SIpRp~O$ED PROP05EJ7 SITE PLAN I l a i n i l ~ ,IOr „ ~t~t~aV1 ,all ~(~foVt~t~ y a~ for n f ¦ 4 _ '1{I 1Ir q I 1 - mf'r' 1 1 1 - - _ - - • a • Prime ~~1 114 ,a To ! t t' j r it n N _ ti)K. Z j w 1 I 4 ! ~ il! • 1 \~s= ; II 1 { I r It } ' 11 it I I ' ` II it i1 #I 1 fRiTZLEN f w¦ao 1 li, PIERCE !1 ' I pl ' AACNI Tf ~T~ 1 I I 1 Il • ~\vi • ry a • - 11l0 ~ • Nwr+ ¦ w Na~~ j~~'~D 1 / • „ LSITE PLAN f PROPOSEY~ ralTE PLa f410~ CHAPTER S DETAR-ED PLAN RECOIvIMENDATIONS ~uhtV~~ G : 13uilcl .~c ~in~, LIONSHEAD ARCADE RETAIL EXPANSION r 1 t a -ion i LW I'HOU5ELODGE VAIL ZI oft REDEVELOPED LIONSPRIDE BUII'DING REDEVELOPED PARMING DECK RETAIL EXPANSION de and Redeveloped Parking Dec ad Arcade, Vail ZI, Liflhvuse Lodge. Li°~prek Figure 5-7- Lionshe LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE-14 I a r . ,t ~ ~ II~ f 4l y s 1 tfkl• i., ' t F t r; 3 s~ i i I i 11' _ ft L'~ ~ r3 ' E 5 , i ~ i { I y ; k _ k~°I S. a ~ ~ t ~ ti C J F z . _ , y t ~ it xt:l .'L ttl r,~t` FIE] (El- { j 'Giil[ . ,ro U~~i F n o~ ! ~ i ; c i v vt Y+ } ~ A'h.4txia2 ` yj s . ' ~ 1" p • ~ i • r 1 Y1 proposed East Elevation. 77 . lAr i a g f a ~a. i s + 3~- } t' a ` 0 4 X - h ter. tin 5t Devatiom p NX'iLC~D ''I'g ®g g TO. RIP1l~ T. O. RIDaG fullultflJUJJf MRUt)~~ { LL'yd, a I.OtT . i Lam I . j E EB 00 LMl. a u cm .9 ~i#f § LNS 4 ; 1 1 11 f F Lena ~ s i f L4- ,:Lek n` FRITZLEN PIERCE AllieNiTICTs SOUTH PROPOSED 5OUTH ELEVATION wr To acIfte - • J A501 a,cv aom TO RlOA! ~~0~720D0~ TD.I~IDN! ~02I~DD MIL a LO" I 920030 o--~° - - - EBE B- [EBB .~h. ruz, %Y' L LEVILO a„m ® 881 Itl 0 0 'FH V-.l c+j H1, 1!1'1.16? ~r•;i: 'it 1 - 1 Hl LNS I 7Mi70~"-s ~ "r=== I I - - w *-612T2D FRITZLEN PIERCE A&CMIT,CTO PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION IM ATIml f A,~n~ I r kl'~ ~~"I~" 'uid ~pSa91p p"r ~.w/nn ~'1i l~w~ IQiiur {SVd Irv. Zvi ION GG ~ ~ t -VALY_ - u ~.w- f CE PIER ?f tMlTftYf ~yft.f M ~~M MwM ' ~UILt7IN6 SZGTIONS L_. n.rw.wa ~GT10AI 8a3 ,~j Lodging Quality Assurance Update December 5, 2000 Units Toured: 2,000 *There are about 400 additional units on the schedule to be toured before the end of the year. Properties that do not wish to participate in program: Encore Mountain Properties 15 units Vail Valley Real Estate Brokers 36 units Properties that have not confirmed their participation in the nrogram: Christie Lodge 280 units Crossroads Realty 29 units Global (Vail Run) 54 units Rams- Horn Property Management 12 units Vail Management Company 34 units Vail Realty & Rental Management 31 units West Vail Lodge 10 units to be toured Reservations *Incorporation of ratings into the reservations sales pitch in order to let the guest know what they can expect from the accommodations booked The Vail Valley Tourism& Convention Bureau reservations department and Vail Beaver Creek Central Reservations each have a list of the overall property scores. Both companies are in the process of loading ratings into the computer. Property ratings will be incorporated into the reservations sales pitch and relayed to customers by the end of December. The Lodging Quality Department will train all central reservation agents how to use the ratings information during the reservations process. Website *Makes information about lodging quality readily available to the public. Streamlines the administration, communication, and reporting involved in the program. Hill & Tashiro Marketing has completed the first phase of the Lodging Quality Assurance website. Lodging Quality information will be available through the websites of the VVTCB and Vail Resorts. We are in the process of populating the database with information, in order to go live this month. In addition to making LQA information readily available to the public, this site has been set up in order to facilitate the tracking and paperwork involved in the entire lodging quality process. Broadcast e-mail capabilities will make it extremely easy to communicate with all of those involved in lodging quality. Attached is a brief description of information to be included on the site. It Communication *The VVTCB will stay in touch with the second homeowners, as well as the community regarding Lodging Quality. Lodging Quality "Magazine"- Bi-annual: This is a publication that we will publish in house twice a year. This piece will highlight Lodging Quality information and upgrades, as well as skier and resort trends. There will also be a vendor resource guide, aimed at the second homeowner, included in this piece. Our intent is to distribute this publication to all second homeowners, property management companies, and hotels. It will be displayed in various businesses throughout the Vail Valley, as well as both information centers. We expect the first issue to be out spring of 2001. Guest Feedback: We are developing a guest survey tool that will be used to measure, specifically, the progress of Lodging Quality. Data will be published as it is received and intcLF,eted. Lodging Quality Website. Public PaSe -Overview, history, and description of the Lodging Quality Program. This page is an introduction to the site. Properties & Ratines -Comprehensive list of all properties and their ratings. Newsletter -Will contain current Lodging Quality information. This page gives us a way to communicate program updates to the public, as well as the community. Vendor Section -These pages will contain a list of building contractors, furniture stores, and other businesses that will facilitate the renovation process for owners and property managers. Anyone will be able to log on and search for vendors that can assist them with their particular upgrades. Member's Onlv -This section will provide information for the property management. Managers will be able to log on and retrieve their property checklists, as well as property requirements, and monthly inspection schedules. There will also be a section where they can e-mail feedback and comments to lodging quality management. In addition to the above, the VVTCB will be able to load all checklist and touring information into the database that was built for the site. We will be able to run reports that will help in identifying problem areas and improvements throughout the valley. Communication will be extremely efficient with our broadcast e-mail capabilities, and instead of copying all checklists for the properties; we will simply send them electronically- saving a lot of time and paper. Lodging Quality Scores As of December 5, 2000 RATING DESCRIPTIONS OVERVIEW P: PLATINUM 900/0-1000/0 A unit with this rating represents the finest accommodations in the area. The furnishings and appointments are superior, as are all other aspects of the interior. First impressions are "WOW!" Everything in the unit is first rate and coordinated. Style and design are unsurpassed. These properties are the best of the best and are not lacking in any area. G: GOLD 800/6-89% A unit with this rating reflects recent interior design motifs and coordinated decorating efforts. Inventory contained within each room of the home or unit is upscale and in excellent condition. In short, a gold unit is comfortable and stylish with the feeling of home. S: SILVER 700/o-790/o A unit with this rating reflects a nice accommodation with quality furniture that is gently used. A consistent style is apparent throughout, although unit is a bit older and lacking in thoroughness and finishing touches. B: BRONZE 60%-690/6 A unit with this rating reflects a more sterile environment. Personality and decorating motifs are present, albeit not fully coordinated; there may be a "pieced together" feel. First impressions are "OK". Inventory contained in each room of the home or unit is mostly utilitarian and meets minimum expectations. In short, a bronze unit offers a no frills, but acceptable lodging experience. 0: SUBSTANDARD Below 60% A unit with this rating does not meet minimal rating standards. First impressions are generally, "I won't stay here!" Inventory contained in each room of the home or unit is sparse, mismatched, and/or severely worn or broken. In short, a substandard unit does not reflect first class resort lodging to destination vacationers. We will not rent substandard properties in the Vail Valley. PRDPERI,' ' • C Fug IftLptwe Mawagevuewt jAv6tLers at vaLl IRpoUo Pariz Lodge I,4rosa ChaLets/Escape with space f l'Wcl owy Chalet 84 *Kt e Chalet 7 r- 'cypress Chalet 81° L r Creel;-, west covedos I I *SC west Cowd05 Covet... 1Sest westerve vatlc,Lo Lodge IStghorv. Revetals = ISLa62Sear Iww S6~ ISotduc Realty ' Swavedess-cadvu.us Realty = - "ALL seasows #S1-F, ~4 ; f I *Swtolge street #12 79f. 1 *~LYSt Sawl2 #2 81°l ' *~ruge Itona.e 82°t *IfeUberg Hovm 80~ *Marlrs Ffora.e 92~ *RLveYhouse #1 0.3 *RDckLedge Restolewee ss°( ,I *scorpLo #204 }6~ * Sr orpLo #205 *sr orpLo #3O3 ' (J *sCorpto #305 82°~ *sGorpto #403 84` *scorpto #405 roteaw #8 82°~ *TL *vaU core #10 77.3 *vaLL core #12 81°j *VQU malts west Chalet #10 03~ *Vclu malts west chalet #15 74f. *vLLLage Cewter #1e, 895 *vLLLage Ceveter#2e, X97 *vLLLage cewteY #4c s1~ 1 *vtLLage CeveteY #4D 84` *vLLLage Cewter #4,) 91.4 *vLLLage cevtey #,5c, god *vLLLage Cewter #5e, 94~. *vLLLage Cewter #6E 81°~ *vtuage eewter #6~ ~6~ j *vortau f er #103 81 *waLL street #3o5 89~ *WAL street #308 A *Mest Hrorue 84~ SuelzCreelzMAwagewtewt t_;_ *8o wayvee Creek Dr. 83°l '''220 North FALrway 84° 238 North FALYWay 925 'Such Creek A104 83 .,I *Suclz ereelz Szos sod Cewtev wWwL 84r~ f *CewtewwLaL covet... *Cewtewwtal covet... a i-'_ chateau vaLL ChrtsttAwtq, Ives. - *AL seasows 70 j *grtdge street Lodge oo°. J *Chateau Chr~sttawta 80~ ~ ~ *Chr~stianta Lodge 85°( *LevLM Rouse 82°~ *MLLL creed "Vail Center Place I-VuLa Valhalla christte Lodge coLorado Vgcatton FfovN.es 1 94~ comfort lww - Avon is creelWde at Beaver creed 86 (Crossroads Realty, Ltd. IAtsttwation Resorts I ti' 1 *Ewziaw 94 *LM_ Tower 74~ *LMIG Townhouses r-0. *Vatl 21 -2L *vantagePotwt 75°to `*westwtnd East west Resorts Elm * odge ryL ~ Sear Paw L *Suclehorn Ffovue 9c- *rhe Enclave I g9 *~atrways 917 *cjreystowe 22 - *I-ttghlawds Lodge 84 *FttghLawds Stopeside 0-9 * Fttghla nds Towv, honLes 81r. *FrtghLands west?~ew 275 *"Citt Mountain Lodge 90 f. *Ftyatt Penthouses 9g~ *Lodge at Rvow Center ~j *MPHut .sctuare 91~ `j*Mccoy PeW?. Lodge 9~°(0 *Meadows Townhouues 84°0 Poste Montane Lodge *Rtdgepoint 82~ "Villa MDntaVle I 917 *vtuage HAL I 80~ ELhz view g§S I .-9 Elk- Vtew Residence I 94% Encore MouwtatV. Properties I F ver reeve Lo a *Ftotels *COndDS I ~6°t Pallrudge at vatL I a!e`_ ` € ^-a CiaLat4n Lodge g8~ elastof r1raw&shaKLmer a.,.u.. I : global FrospttClUty (WILL RUw) f ` - <,ore creep Properties Ftalstead ~ Assoc. I° Ftyatt Regency at SC ~ a iww at RtVerwatl2 - condos = "Condos I gg~ *FFotets I g2~ K,tva at weaver Cre6z ~Lckestde terrace I t _ L%fthouse Cowdovwtntuvus ; ;~Eii ~ Ltowshead Iwn I g~ Lodge at Corv(ULera I 9z~ Lodge at LLDwshead Lodge at vaU _ O.E *CDwdos ~ ~ ` *Hotels I = 1 LDdge Tower Manor vaU Lodge MarrLDtt's Mountatw Resort IMarrtott'sstreamtde IMLwturw Iww - IMDntaneYDS f cL~, IMouwtaun. HORS IPawdo cabins _ IParl2 f+DVSe IParlz Meadows Lodge I`= Parl2 Plaza Lodge IPLwwacle Resort sHstevus man } I *9 vatl Road I -5°( I I *sawdstowe *vaLl21 I *vawtage PDLwt IPradenttaL core Range Prop. *MDwtaweros *oxford CoL4.rt I*Robason RQSLdev re *SOndstowe -o V. M f= } *YLK ber Creel?, Log CgKv, f *vawtage Potwt m-Ftorw IRDDSt Lodge IT-he Resort covwpawy *SC Lodge - FtoteLs 'M *SC Lode -condos ,sy 9 I=--_ *Chavter at SC - condos 83~ sawdstowe Creel? club IsLmba Ruw ~ Isttzvu.ariz Lodge sowwewalp Resort at vatl *Av-StrLa Ftaus club 94~ *sowwewaLp Resort 96°to *swtss Ftotel spa 04~ suburban Lodge m, Thrall Condos YLVUberfalls Mawagevuewt ` I I*4444 strearusLde Curie *4542streav,LsWe Ct. Dup *YLw~be ally CDwdOS ` is ,r~3El YLVDLL LDOIge I ~5°( vatl Athleev Club IvaU cascade CDvwlovKtwtUwlS *SLLLe spruce Lodge 8f *Cascade creerzsLde F•+ovwe 94~ } ,~I*Cascade FtLLlstde FtDvwe (B) 24r~ *Cascade WELLstde Ftovve (W) eo°. *Cascades ow gore Cre6z 84°f 'I *CDldstreavu ~8°( r'... *creeV2stde LDdge 90~ :!I*r~lew/Lew Ftovue 86°t *LL fFSLde I 92~ `*"Dws PDtnt (E) I 905 I *LLJDNS PDtwt (W) I 2-35 *MuLrace J o(V *Mouwtatn Chalet (N) 957 *Mountatw Vlew Ftoym 867~ *Parl2stde VULa I . 92 *ReevesAtpLne Ftome I 05 j *stephaw Gore Horne I 90~ *VCFtC Penthouses I 82 wall Cascade Resort I g f~ wall Horne Rtv OLs = *BashzerVULe - LH center #so,- 35°( *Beedon - village Center #iD I g *BYant f f - Treetops #3B I 86~ *Ba ole - LFt Center #302 I ~9 C` *CaccKowe House *eastLe Group - Treetops #4D I 23~ *Chatkew - VaU Polnt #30 I 20. *Chandler - crossroads #Bi "Chat field - Texas Condo #~B Ig°r 'Coldstream. Condos #17 *DewLam.a - LFt center #301 I 7-4 *Detatam.a - LH Center #309 *Depree - Treetops #5e I g3~ *Ehrewberg - LFt Center #101 I ~g°( *I=LtZgtbbons - Potato Patch #42 I 8o~ *Frierson Rouse ( 83r. *4bsow - Treetops #5B I g5r. *Gtaser - TaUsm,aw #340 I 8(,r. ' "Gregg Rouse I 937 *GuLwness - Potato Patch #6 I gg~ { *Hartwtg Ftovue ! g9~ *Ftobart House I ~2°[ *Hoffvuaw - Crossroads #Di I g "Howe - Northwoods #102 "Humphrey - Treetops #4B I g2~ *)ohwsow/Qxucl2nwrt - Treetops #3D I 83~ *K RpLan - Gol fcouse Towwhome #55 I e3~ *Kecl2 - Treetops #2R I 95f. *Nobts - Talisman condos #240 I 01~ *Northwoods - #D202 ( g25 *Northwoods - #D203 I YLO *Northwoods - #1>204 I -90f. *Parl2er - vatl Townhouses #24 I 1-55 *Petersow - Treetops #3A + 825 *Preru - MUL Cree12 #401 I 82~ *Reyv:aud - LH center#2oz I 33°t "sears House I gq *stachler - Potato Patch #20 I s3~ "Todd - VaA Townhouses #2B ` --15 vaU internattonaL } watt Management Company, Vail Property sales/ Mgmt. I-vti -ti o4 Ivatl Racquet club ` If Vail Realty JF Rental Mgmt. *Ap,DUo Parle Lodge *Breal2away west +*Crossroads *Lodge at LLowshead *Northwoods Condos = ='.!!ti_~ ti'I!s`' Shaul Ha "strawberry Pare *Texas Townhouses r y "Townsend Place *Vall Trails East = *Vllla r-Drtlwa I'VUL(Aoe center WILL Resort Rentals *1025 core Creelz Drive *Apollo ParIZ Lodge *L mshead Arcade Condos " "sues Vail Condos ~ "Vantage Point ~ Wail spa Condo Assoc. I _ _ Wail valley Real Estate grolzers l Vail Vlllage Inn "hotels I &4 *CDwdDS *Arrowhead Property Mgvut. `a-_: ' *gachelor Gulch "Borders Lodge *G-llzhorn Lodge : *GarK.e Creek chalet j;;.; *Iwn Pt Beaver CreelZ I Si°l *OXfDrd Court 1= s *Piwes Lodge *saddleridge at sc I' *seasows @ Avow *sPruce Tree Lod9e I *stJames Place "Townsend Place *Trappers Cables _ M Western seasows *gorders Lodge I 83~ *-&orders Townhouse 1 "guclzhorw9 93 *CAstle Pealz Condo -OA 9o°t *Castle Pealz condo ;~,6 91~ *Clubhouse TDWVI,hOr&e 5 82°~ *DalWta Court 49 86°~ *DAIzDta Pa He 90~ *DA wta Pariz 26 90°( "Ironwood 7 I 84~ *seasows @ Arrowhead 84 "spruce Tree Lodge I 87~- *Towwsewd Place i X97 1NLLLows/Riva Ridge south z "Edelweiss ~*RivA Ridge south I * n/~llows €i; M. Wolcott Iww SEPTEMBER 2000 i VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW TOM 0F, mNo vember 24, 2000 The September Vail Business Review examines sales tax collections for September and year to date collections through September. Overall September sales tax increased .7% with Retail decreasing 1.0%, Lodging increased .7%, Food and Beverage increased 2.8% and Other (which includes items such as utilities, taxable services i.e. plumbing and electrical and rentals or leases) increased 1.7%. Year to date through third quarter collections resulted in a 3.4% increase overall with Retail increasing 3.0%, Lodging increased 3.5%, Food and Beverage increased 5.9% and Other decreased 1.0%. September Special Events Included i 1999 2000 24th Annual Labor Day Softball Tournament Sixth Annual Vail Jazz Party Vail Trail IOK Westfest Fifth Annual Vail Jazz Party Vail's Annual Rubber Duck Race Jammin Jazz on the Lawn in Lionshead Vail Athletic Club and Spa I OK (u, 10,000 Westfest Oktoberfest Vail Kid's Fly Fishing Weekend Festival Vail Evergold Trail Run i Oktoberfest Vail's Annual Rubber Duck Race The Budlight Mountain Bike Challenge i During the 2000 legislative session, a new house bill reducing the Colorado state sales and use tax rate was signed by Governor Owens. House Bill 1259 lowers the state sales and use tax rate from 3 percent to 2.9 percent effective January 1, 2001. Sales tax forms and the Vail Business Review are available on the internet at http://ci.vail.co.us. Please let me know if you no longer require a copy mailed to you. Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax collections, as opposed to actual gross sales. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125 or Steve Thompson at (970) 479-2116. Sincerely, 4LL~ U~~6~ Sally Lorton Sales Tax Administrator SEPTEMBER 2 0 0 0 SALES TAX VAIL VILLAGE September September September 1999 2000 % Collections Collections Change e m ` , a 1 42% Retail „"..>..C.: , x y.L' " , 3' = , r'. • : fy ~"y i_?., as ;~k;;,~,`~;~f~ g. .,.~:5.,~,'a L <:,'``ti.~;>~'":j z `,h~• ate„ ,,";y',=:: _ : i'.: : ::s! ~ u e'? ;'r•"rr:~ ~rs . r>'„i: ~ `"b' ~~;~~.f~ Lodging i"lY.ns s._,'! >,:^[i.'.9'<'&, ib;}.PT'....,..e~`:,;:.`: •:y E '"z;::a ;av;~Y,r~,ry„ '=s~` ~ -„3..r'~y_ r.t>I:.'r'v~r', ~x}r~ ~:..,.fi:'•;s rte: ~,.,n ;'i s"':'. £.J n~'rl.b.c ^r,~w~'i'.fr , k~^t;l^ .k >f a'~~Y •..~:i; Q,.~ errs',:;w.~}'..a._~..'~..,>:>..=:..::.r. ~sy~fya~,~'^y4rj?;° ttr".~...'K.,s'':+:t~~:rs;'~.'x.~~•iaa Food & " :,,1" Beverage t'.:';.°.•'^11,4238S." :'129 ~i477, . ; Ar ,y , Other rn~?x ',:4,'; ma's„ ,'~:ik-_ SF ::'f r °"3'~'" x.r:s,',+;:'~". ':i1'.":"~:i•,::.ay jY'°r. ',;u-''; ja.a. :'*;.-7a:" , `w~:';.a.;'~:.:,,L~, '',k~'~ :.'a , i8="'.:'':1,='rl°` r ixb = Y C°,'i,'~'. F~T ~•Yc 'fir; js.'.j:?'•`°^'.h''•}•+ <l; wT3' ,'t]. Total ~ 552;A LIONSHEAD September September September 1999 2000 % Collections Collections Change PA;' I i. "~~yu ^.,€.n. ;3';5;4` ~srr ~.;9° f;~'" ~"Y•'sx a„x>~';, i"u »}j''r, ,.,,.;,.,.,,I,. ,>y .;t'a'; a,fii`"i'~w.',i , ~~"x'.aig,~~:"•~.'~aA `.3'i•;sRY',,'',:.'~.;~~i~.''v% .'"",••~€9";',,~'~'"'}. Y,.,. 'sFi•^>. .7r:.•, ~>."5?.: '•z;".:!':'• ."1,: s~~°c ..r. ;=_''~',",~.3Y.~,+..y~: '.'1,',~ ~tx;;..~.~u. ' :~ri' ~',..k~~'s; .,`y°r;Y„':: !;"w':~''l' '"'•,~,;'„5 . ,~3„atii~. ! `.~,£•'.r' ;,3;;iE.i,"~,.•.,!r~.;`' c.:. Retail :h 3424'1_;£.;. r y. :,-,3,.•.~"~`^' 'r`..'-~,',a x%+~`*=f~ ~,=r, sy: i.z~• r. i~'j°s~'~:«.r ztr „7'•~i Lodging v^ i •":a 3. ^l`T4 x ,~.y, tt pL•,.s^• ~ i.?:=°: ~x:'„i:°,Y:s ,,:tc i:^ ~=~':a„ •"'"r,: _.9::~z;tk?.":;>,~:; ~`m arg::',,n:+,~'~_.:w..., ":i': s,~:5"~;L~? x p-., :;y,G xv~! ,.';:";i:;„c'i ~.a,>s'-;<~.} }~;'~•"";5~:: A~',.. sa:: v.4'.}>i>,'}'~`~r°da: ;a:, ~f ai b$J~> , a.~,S"•„Ag, .~;r€;('r-awa°-'~w ;:N. 'y~<.:,:;:. ,.;;y, 'ro^s',• : P„ji ,."'~p•r,;:.~ i4',~e',',' 'i.~ <&:•'' ,:s'i': Y^,•:s';`.,r.: +tt '40"E Food & :f), n:}k > =:x< € :w ` .v,''. f 3y S.b ±x~•a .5 ,.,f-x. :.~•"a=a 3.~ sy J. 16 Beverage 42 ' .,r, = , ..~~',['_F,'>i=,`,ti.: " r Aa, yler •m,•-'f;ii"%stt(",}'yi3; s%xfri? 3<, . :'~K:,,i~t`~i"~rr. a~-,; y'Ry:.`vm' _m - V.ffi"ym'fa..~.~'n r""1-•n `+tita:,.a. ",@~=".•"`°. f,<s+p7 .>3: _ uv. •,?iw~~ ,;k"vtf.. mjE.~ r lF,... i" . ,a:,?, P-.5° d ? ,r•" , .'P"' z,i. F,y445 .xyh„` off r-gfj`..n.: Other y? err ~,i~. ',"=.x-'>~i yr:~~:z I',' a~„a e ia,' ~ r~!.r;;~b~•.o::^.l',~,,iu''tk."u';.3~„v~fr"",~,;'`'" 8i` ,1' - ,'},n; c..?3`?/iv 'tE...:;L--' _ a"fv:riiNli n.ilx("" sYa ~5:':::.:FUfs>~%1",'4:1~'~i~ :tt~Y `x6':~ ~'~t'°';r•;,j5,~ "=M.' ,I a:,.;a; .,..r;.,., ,'>r',.w,y„ ; sW,,, ,;.,"i' .t. ' ,y~.,;.. ~ ,n,. 4 IA 579: r,_ Total 43r *,:-.r'.,.,. 5,>F •CM Cy,,'Y ;n;~L: 'fi'r:'„p,'; SEPTEMBER 2000 SALES TAX CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAILISANDSTONEIWEST VAIL September September September 1999 2000 % Collections Collections Change x "E'~ ;:~,rib~<, :'.i•::;, ~3: "a3'y~::a ~3. zti:',m;,r<: Ef! x9b~:a q•g..~ya;' o- a~k: ,rk.3y, `s ;~3 ~s, '"',~L"s'" y:: ~3r3' i ••Yv0'`iyY•. ^ .`Y'.~-' Retail ;':ate: ;;~::s„ r~3~,.%$,,yti:;~„~ '"?;°~a3«^f xcr,t"y,. „`~,q~x.''j4;';~.'-aW~~rxEE'.=~•, Lodging 45,158ryA;'; 47 3= x, Food Beverage 40" X38:: ~ r=48 77~/]~ '~'~:N ;;niry~;;-},,,.15' '-..'i:~;,~;~r'ti••` ap ~,,;;„AE.: • ,a~;`:.;.5'~ ;'";E~:~'t' ,~.'Yt . :;3a•sa,m .x- ,=.:a: , ff, SY,: ,,;-.~?'.•,'?:Tr<-a3'yytt i.:a,. !aN•~ ~=e4`.,:3• •';~„5~ Mp?4.. ,t~ ,~i'..~ ro sy~ n~i~r.F., a`~-°'•,.",• Other '.5,..;,;t';;,da mar:.:h%'m.s,`."r,.'~vt.~:&c~;~"c:;<;'".~. ~rs,;.'MY;sie3 c~jc 3~~-: k.» ~s' 3~, '-`^•x`' ~ w. a":r^`;>, c:13n lr ~:k:t ..~h,., : ;:'a••:E . ;i'u:,=:?*,; .o .=:;3::.s'~,j,~.a~m,;~~":'"'::~•s,. z•m 2- ° ~ m.~`f 5& .,:T',.^ zS uE _}~r s..S ~x}%;'r't .S,rx. y6"' ~ •'„-.r,'-e • "c~'•''~ <3'f'~i~';G..• ;7r r.ff-:~'C, : ~~.,..x 9 1'.:. a 3 -41 Y-,..£<, of is ,4: L$r k fl..:` £,qa ,,3f:. h.±.` Total OUT OF TOWN September September September 1999 2000 % Collections Collections Change ~'.1^T~Erx.~ i,;~ 3 3'i. ~ ~b,.r :TS•: 5,:c': H,"1.1 ;.~"4,'~" ~~.3 a'~r::n., Y'• %f 3'i 'x • z's!:)> .k::'3> ? „y:~3<,Ls'$'~y' :3 x:. is •:,.sya'^?~[.:; Retail °ee'',:'~ .G;; ~n Y' ' f: ~ ; `'rsd:'u'~ a.'Y3: > ~ a"%'9.: y`~ `•b~.~•_N,p~„+, "'y= ::'E%" ;Yl ;,:.3;3°';", a'. ~f;;z';;,~.~r''ci.r 'd-.,, •F.n 'X° .rA`~~ '~T3=. :A%! .•1 gy'm` q.:t, ~.:k5 5'i, `:x+ x •'s~'; ~i,~!si,`q, „`.,."~'m Lodging 6{1... 5 ys;~,p3,rc`,»:..£~ ?o`aw.:Z.~P~;,`.H-:,,, d.~e:~~:;"'R'hi-a ;z„'~~`ia ;'~'~.,~1~EY~S ^n. y;,,~,`~93'a.'s. '~;''-!~5-~'ww"^ff ~ d%E;'.u 3 .t3' ' x, :}.^3:%.~',G~.?:$'.,3'~" L .~••"&`z;.~°` 'x '1 4;:E.fi» =.i4n ''°as' r::,~,$""x a, .'a4" ;.'.Q%a.:'':. '`i~• 7 z-, ,,..a'•._,M; =:.,3';i`: w,~',$..: M; Food & n,»,v'~: 4. .-'r': 1 , n i..r,:..'~r - . b r~.'",. ~1: ;'+e G.y ;r;.:~~• Beverage '12 i Ss;• ~,:~'%3 $:":;~~~t<'.~ 'x :=..'s:5; :fs> ;w°1'•;9 4':~;,:acx.=::: - . " 'zs^ . ~ S~ ,y.5.._,,w.- i <ic c: %ff~;-. ~ „r'x•,.3':: Vii.'.,,; .b 3 '..3°'eihi:n ~ "pwi'V, n }i _ r ~ , Other ~~t ~"£~'~%ra•"='}'-M r=~€::b'r ";A 'Sig'=_~;. ~,:r;~::'?-:;=?-`'i -^.S . rn ~i y'i~9,';, r"~~ •:,PiraA 3.%, , '',3.:,`.:\..:,.3, :P ~E:r"`£3: a:.°',. :.s:~ ~4'~'`"^ Via': =ir J. ;f•Pi~ ,.s•b.'.•° -°:Y,: '..%:!:a ry.*.~'SE:Y'v,•.2;,pf£+;. -4 A Total X", 0 SEPTEMBER 2000 SALES TAX TOTAL September September September 1999 2000 % Collections Collections Change ;q Retail 3 3 44? ~,'t;".. ir: •x., %:r : § ^ .<;.";-r, 19,i~ a ~`,x;""":. ~;'~h ,..afi°.,.., .r, Lodging " i Food Beverage '22%'006'- Other ae3:;v,3"N:f,i.gjs•- ...1,':~,1Y:S nY'g; s'.:ri R; 3, '~2"-~ ~'S:';; :'yys; ~i~''„r!2't!: . q; sS { ;i::F fir, , v,. s$,.... Total' 81sT ti ,i RETAIL SUMMARY SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER 1999 2000 % COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE FOOD 92,869 98,984 6.6% LIQUOR 14,018 14,380 2.6% APPAREL 49,216 44,883 -8.8% SPORT 67,121 75,555 12.6% JEWELRY 28,689 22,861 -20.3% GIFT 12,650 11,767 -7.0% GALLERY 4,549 2,875 -36.8% OTHER 54,008 48,138 -10.9% HOME 327 861 163.3% OCCUPATION TOTAL 323,447 320,304 -1.0% SEPTEMBER 2000 YTD SALES TAX VAIL VILLAGE Sept. 1999 Sept. 2000 99/00 YTD YTD % Collections Collections Change ::+r?~ ~!I', r"""r~}y.~h';dJ. <~J'G~~E.:~a",~,~'y>~?, ',.h.,' ;,F~ •":3£S~,?"~ix~ Retail X070 41;a.,,„ :•,'J 2"308'' . 2 , µ''1: 80i1 +14x2 Lodging Food & ~k{.,:~;",;,g;t'• y; „ gig. ~,>~i• '?~.~i:i '%r~g '.s'.t~"<. 1 ,:F>: ~,',i?, :~}y ? %.~S'~'f,: rim, Beverage 56 •;;':Kj;?£.d..;,; '.,fi R`~:N`~<: v:y~iKi ~,---':f `'f°i ~tiYi~~s.~~k13,i~~yw,^' i:ii<~f t;.~^ ;:;V@,.. .,.T3'~~y",~•}w? , ,'xY ~ -:y;a' - k ,4- - ~ A ) § ~ i _ T ~ '3~;~ `','i~ i"i Other 78'x3' 9t) : ,Lira:-i,„:Y~s~:"',i~„::s,:..;>s.i!'..j,~~,b #a.~<`i'.";•^'" : *E' tl"b;" iah: 'Yy!,,,},d%~ `g'".;. 6v%'}'( '~"35i~~,'~•%:. y- Total 8. M, ,${44 . ry `3.''#`x' 7~t " e•'.r"..~^,; -n i 9 "3 z„£. •y'Sc. RY, ' 9°."'i: q r 3, v < n .r.. v° " . x r Fv`'ii ~,sg•. Fi`~'r LIONSHEAD Sept. 1999 Sept. 2000 99/00 YTD YTD % Collections Collections Change ;.Y~:i .F1:::}'>'•?,:a ";.i'r ~N `hr9,., . •1 < «~3~"'.~z<';:.~a;`;"7.. s,~» Retail 728.,629 Lodging _ ';:9"1:;:1-v9:: Y" "„xti•: v':k:;., ,~~t Y. ,~<E;a,y_ a, ~;`;y'';"'p`"x.., v,• ,"rr'x a .,a'..>?, „•.'tis:~';.x',?',~f}j :.r,.;., ~','rai::""`..'l~';,~~''~=q.;;~y}rta,>"F,,~utY~"''~i, ,-i;-$~.~~:~~>:: y,~,.~.. A'_" :~A •.3'?~ ...gyp'. t; fa:v, '.t'y ofi.}': 5~;w ~`Yi S''~'Sf6 C. 'rg~ j yµir.: n <F,~: , ~ ;S•e , 3',i,N ~W"A, ''1~ t `~'''"yi ~ i ~'r: ~,f ~ Food & ...R . ,'~S i '.vf f;A• :.Ta::,° ;~'z '•id. ~ ~ i£,,,..: ;£~a.; }g a n 7. :z." ;£.ri '5%~, a: i!''rh;', ~,'Z+< ,~'„_x'A ';'r'^'~s`• 75 X Beverage 34 '4 4-1 T,'~::„°..•, :3:2i" .,x.r.'xyi~;...,.°,>''~aa<b. a:'q•" ;a}•.hr. %i5`*ri',". :~8:j ar ^ :,Y •"F,:;-:,i-~i'~s~~' :;'?;.b s~:.<%.~,, K; :Ci 1'y^x~`»~•}... 'i'i;':is"r".~ ii`•~j3,:.~; z-;3~~~?; Other x, Total +3" Y An• , ~'~;~~;M , x:^€<;n'r=:: ~f,~ ~x''~:; ~cF ~~3~~"yy~•~<? aa;;,..,y.~;.:9 `.::%'}i'a y.;~5"'~~. ,`°i4r''. ,r. -'~:~suti}r''.. n. x ,~..eS='}? "3.". ,3a• l SEPTEMBER 2000 YTD SALES TAX CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAILISANDSTONEIWEST VAIL Sept. 1999 Sept. 2000 99100 YTD YTD % Collections Collections Change etail 279 654 3?4" T 4: Lodging 't'' n •~y i; b'i £n.~flszk, '„•evs: ,:',R.p .=~`:r^ ".~rs~.:'~:3"'; rL'."'f'-=,° ~3i, 'f.~:.'zai.":,: .~`Snz%:.i: r ' Food & Beverage they .J13 Total 2`642 282' `2 F 30 3 3? o 5e1;' ':x3;" zz .q;..,>„ F-• '"33 i';. ,y, l: hu3 :s'; d,:'tl~" OUT OF TOWN Sept. 1999 Sept. 2000 99/00 YTD YTD % Collections Collections Change •iz r~ i a ~ ~ ;fi- ; ~ S E x' ~ r'~:~ t a~'Mi ~r~~~j Retail 2404,.:, ::•~2^V'~a`;'"YV f"% ilY'~y:' _ :m~i-'x'. IV';,:; ~,='z'ac:.,,,,•tT.a < .r.,3ryx 'z: Y~-u.. `":?s+.~wtiz;:y.::j,ry 4 1~ ' ' ;-_2, >::r? 'N~ =y, rk-;.:n rik:7~'=:':Mq ~„y E'':'• °.n a,r • :=E.' Lodging % :i F:•'^,i~' .'«'x, s,,;",; ,;~«y ~'a,^,', nNi^i.,;xis',;^.",j ~4,... s, ,'r=i, ,.i„ .'„.,?.x•wi",'..: E,x - a,-risir:.?-u '"•'''yi„r" ~.s.::, °,•s..' Food & Beverage 992_:• v,: "~q. :ak,:^ly: n~ ai"A.~, _a J:fi:y»::k:;:~,,;}~Y:''.".' ' 3 ~ t ...~.u';.;_ ~itl3a~.'~' ~ ~:h'~;:..:~a'•". x: 'a':': .i. R S '•',~z,'ss .y ''S,r~i,~~~F~i»~,;~ ..r'a". - S.,a:,~:.;~-M ='i~ ~,d,. i. ..3,: kE~.' :="}E': ::rr'~e.:;:>- L,;~'.:,,.>`, ~';.r•;:'~ aa~,,,i,.,k,,, Other yf.77'»:.t;'~„=,x,,'3~1,::3",y~„<5:sr•f7, ;~.,s`,,i s~.~'ip3•'%E n:,'~;: ;u.e N.r~iM;. .t ' "~3:&' ~ ;'.ar yr~i+E SF ~b,}', rs a,~„E.,., 'a i ~ ~ ~ 'tri.x °"~>.S"r v`r;'' •i.;y~'.z "a..r':.,.I v~.t.; v;,~`wak,.:gq «>n, .;4,.~irs-' ';,'a,CZ~,~, n~~* C~ i,'. :;3'~~'F:.o tiv s~°Nr.',•}:..,. „k~r.. :xr .-,ti.., ^~'}G~. .9µw.".."k;': ;i:P• «z -r: ,r.y,• ,`a',',~i.b:•. ~..:^.s~x Total '1 '1414 f,, -7 1 :der v, :,l:~:vr':~:~,;»•''" , i`i } SEPTEMBER 2000 YTD SALES TAX TOTAL Sept. 1999 Sept. 2000 99/00 YTD YTD % Collections Collections Change ri r.- 3.0V%, ~4282~';fiµ Retail :.A299;."! 00 . r :3682 % Lodging -=3' 559 647, , .;'F,j,.'.w-i.~ ~i b~v, ,~y., w ,,.i~". }'r ~~"%F~`.".`,.f. "~q':n ~~Yy,i'':r; ':(':S.~L',ri'£:,:u-'>it~"". r,~„£ Food & Y V Beverage ~Fa` ::a' ;•~f'.•` "i•n - i$'iS' g'~ -r!~s..<,,k:~F d, P,~,#•:~ Vin.: ~,e •''1_'S ,M.Z 4~~' `'~iit, ~^~:r J",~i' ,y n~"•"?':~--~"..';,Y,~t'~,,y. ~ir~p'{,+ ~•a. ,~l~~s~: i„i'?>~; Fxa ,a;:!y.,.r~ ,ri.',%"i.;;'; ..^§f. moo, .~i~a.,~~'~ .s,.~ .1 7.5 4~:5 Other 17 a .e . Total Y41 .C-i~ e^~;f.:h;° ',".'e:;g.,F r,.~," ^.y.~: °~•as?<.'A;M .r .i'''~~~rx F:,.: b. ~ - v~`•,.^.xi'.~sz"..n: ...c...}»f;:;~NF.~. « ix.,:e..li'~f- N.T. I RETAIL SUMMARY SEPT. 1999 SEPT. 2000 SEPT. YTD YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE % COLLECTIONS COLLECTIONS CHANGE FOOD 988,011 1,034,182 4.7% LIQUOR 171,475 176,972 3.2% APPAREL 643,359 625,038 -2.8% SPORT 1,454,600 1,529,622 5.2% JEWELRY 218,109 223,025 2.3% GIFT 149,262 141,850 -5.0% GALLERY 41,403 42,076 1.6% OTHER 628,686 644,126 2.5% HOME 4,203 11,385 170.9% OCCUPATION TOTAL 4,299,108 4,428,276 3.0% F RTown of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 04/13/1995 15:37 7138771759 S RUTHERFORD PAGE 01 ld • ~a•db (SUS Uteat. 6 SUSAN RUTH F RFORD- Dec. 12, 2000 Vail Town Council Dear Council Members, I am the co-owner of a duplex with Kaye Ferry. It just came to my attention one hour ago that there will be a discussion today about the co-signature ordinance. This ordinance has been very successful in enabling me to resolve building issues with my neighbor Kaye Ferry. Solely because of this ordana_ r. Ms- E ny for the first time in 19 months began working with me. In late October she sent me a set of plans and asked for my input. I felt we were finally making progress. Since then I have been corresponding with Ms. Ferry and have had several meetings with architects resolving structural and drainage problems. In fact, I am corning to Vail tomorrow and I had asked for a meeting with Ms. Ferry to try to work out the last issues. I was told Ms. Ferry would he out of state. This new effort to change the rules-- the very ordinance rule which has caused Ms. Ferry to communicate with me --this effort seems inconsistent with what I had thought was Ms. Ferry's good faith to resolve the outstanding issues. This is very disappointing to me. I regret that this two signature issue is before you agairAccause you and the PEC staff have already wasted so much time reviewing meaningless plans. I remember one of the councilmen saying during the last Town meeting, "We have a town to run, this is wasting our time." There have been seven Town hearings regarding this duplex. With the passing of the two-signature ordinance, progress was finally being made. Changing or rescinding this ordinance will put the Town back in the middle of this situation and will -turn a cooperative relationship into an adversarial relationship. There will be once again more time wasted reviewing unapproved plans, this is not a logical direction for the Town to take. Please do not change or rescind this ordinance. This ordinance has totally changed the relationship between me and Ms. Ferry. We were finally communicating and working on the plans together. Much progress has been made and I don't want to return to the adversity and discord of the past. Thank you for your time. SincerelArd Susan -,R 3466 ELLA LEE LANE HOUSTON. TEXAS 77027 (713) 877-1643 FAX (713) 877-1759 W5 IJ-14-06 o L j 288 bridge street, vail,.colorado 81657 Vail Town Council 76 N. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 December 11, 2000 Dear Town Council: I am writing in response to Mr. Cadmus' letter of December 5, even though Mr. Cadmus did not copy me. So as not to rely solely on my memory, I called Greg Morrison to research the noise complaints against the Daily Grind. Even though there have been many complaints made, never in the 11 years of my operation has a citation ever been issued. Noise meters have been used to verify the fact that we have consistently been within the Town if Vail noise ordinance limits. Some visitors to Vail have lost track of the fact that this is a resort community. Unfortunately, they decide to stay in the center of Vail Village and expect it to be quiet. Ironically, they don't expect this quiet to exist only at night, we know they also object to garbage trucks in the morning, snow making in the evening and most recently we've been told they don't like their afternoon naps disturbed . The Grind has always attempted to comply with town ordinances and will continue to do so in the future. Sinc ely, Kaye Ferry Owner Cc: Bob McLaunn Torn Moorhead Greg Morrison L e G v~d 288 bridge street, vail,.colorado 81657 Vail Town Council 76 N. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 December l1, 2000 Dear Town Council: I am writing in response to Mr. Cadmus' letter of December 5, even though Mr. Cadmus did not copy me. So as not to rely solely on my memory, I called Greg Morrison to research the noise complaints against the Daily Grind. Even though there have been many complaints made, never in the 11 years of my operation has a citation ever been issued. Noise meters have been used to verify the fact that we have consistently been within the Town if Vail noise. ordinance limits. Some visitors to Vail have lost track of the fact that this is a resort community. Unfortunately, they decide to stay in the center of Vail Village and expect it to be quiet. Ironically, they don't expect this quiet to exist only at night, we know they also object to garbage trucks in the morning, snow making in the evening and most recently we've been told they don't like their afternoon naps disturbed . The Grind has always attempted to comply with town ordinances and will continue to do so in the future. Sincerel Kaye Ferry Owner Cc: Bob McLaurin Tom Moorhead Greg Morrison Id•ld~oo ~,l,e,~c,* r THE VAIL CENTER PRELIMINARY SPACE NEEDS 12/7/00 <><DE5t >>:::;::::;:<>:;::>::>:::«::t<::< ::>:s>::>s;::>:::<:;::>:<;:>::>s::>::::;::::::.:..........................:. RECOMMr..r..c.RECONIMENDED. > . ; o ; _ 33FEATtiRES.......::.:::::..:....:: IGH ..................LOWER..:..:::: ACh ..:..:..:.:::.:I?R14e~r1 F413ZCTION E7CR1iR1E iC£ RANG>v RAT1G>w A M EE` 'IBC.s..:.::.:::<.;.:.::.:::...;:.:.:.;:.::..::...:.:..::::::.:..:..:.::::.;:.;:;;;.:.:::...:.......:.....::.:......:.::::::..:.....:.;:..:.::: CE7I+IFEREN......., > < > > » . C > CE TOWN HALL CONFERENCES WARM 30000 20000 PERFORMANCES STAGE AND BALCONY PRE FUNCTION RECEPTIONS WELCOMING 12000 8000 FACILITY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS-LIKE 5000 5000 ...........:.:;C331+sFERENtCE »:47000_ BREAKOUT 1 MEETING INTERACTIVE 7500 6000 BREAKOUT 2 INTERACTIVE 7500 6000 BREAKOUT 3 INTERACTIVE 3000 2000 PLANNING ROOM PLANNING WHITE BOARDS 1500 1200 SOFT WALLS SEMINAR/DIALOGUE ROOM 1 CONFER INTERACTIVE 2500 2500 SEMINAR/DIALOGUE ROOM 2 CIRCULAR OR 2500 2500 HEXAGONAL CLASSROOM 1 CONFER INTERACTIVE 1000 1000 CLASSROOM 2 1000 1000 BOARDROOM 1 MEETING PROFESSIONAL 500 500 BOARDROOM 2 400 400 READING ROOM/LOUNGE 1 STUDY READING, WRITING 1200 1000 RESEARCH QUIET READING ROOM/LOUNGE 2 600 500 LEARNING STUDIO RESEARCH TECHNOLOGICAL 3500 3000 INTERACTION GIS (GEOL. INFO SYSTEM) 600 500 NEAti TEE'& V.EI -L-'MESS SPACES . EE3 . (D.:::: ICAT[_D): . ? > RECEPTION/LOBBY H&W CHECK-IN WELCOMING 700 700 EXAM ROOM (5) TESTING DIAGNOSTIC 1800 1500 EKG 500 500 LABORTORY TESTING RESEARCH 500 400 DEMONSTRATION KITCHEN DISPLAY INTERACTIVE 1250 1000 MEDICAL OFFICES (4) ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS-LIKE 1250 1000 PROVIDERS (2) 400 300 r THE VAIL CENTER - SUMMARY SPACE ALLOCATIONS 12/10/00 HIGHER LOWER LEARNING & MEETING CONFERENCE SPACE 47000 33000 LEARNING CENTER 49850 41000 SUB-TOTAL LEARNING & MEETING 96850 74000 RECREATION 54SOO 44900. CULTURE & COMMUNITY ARTS 23000 10000 RETAIL 19000 14000 OFFICES 22100 17600 HOUSING 72000 72000 SUB-TOTAL CULTURE & COMMUNITY 136100 113600 SITE AMENITIES PARKING 180000 180000 INTERIOR PUBLIC SPACES 22028 17350 EXTERIOR PUBLIC SPACES - 70500 55500 CIRCULATION & MECHANICAL 15% 96596 83723 SUB TOTAL SITE AMENITIES 356525 325653 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BY SCENARIO 643975 558153; LEARNING & MEETING - 1 15% 96850 74000 13% RECREATION - 2 8% 54500 44,900 8% CULTURE & COMMUNITY - 3 21% 136100 113600 20% SITE AMENmES - 4 55% 356525 325653 58% 643975 558153 Space Allocations - Lower 58% 13% 8% 20% 101 ¦2 03 O4 . +6a~tc~4B1>r f2t'GOMMENUE;R~C04~Ih16NDD':: 1>y41 U#21=5 & HIGH 'LXI?EFi1E1vCE RANGE I Ct+iGr= MASSAGE ROOMS (2) MEDITATIVE 450 300 SHOWER/LOCKER ROOM CHANGING ROOM 400 250 QUIET ROOM SITTING REFLECTIVE 600 500 STORAGE 400 250 NURSES STATION MEDICAL ADMINISTRATIVE 300 200 FITNESS CENTER GYMNASTICS ATHLETIC 8000 6000 DANCE/MARTIAL ARTS EXERCISE SHOWERS, STORAG CLUB-LIKE T4i.& fNE 1X550`>»<<>>1>~0f# SUH-TOTALAt3E:.LEl4l?FitNGS::::;:>::::::::::;- 98>4000 S .sjTaT.AL C>~ARNINx'r Ikl itrtG 850 7?rOOA< . INDOOR ICE Ho-,,.,,, SKATING PRACTICE 30000 26400 EXHIBITIONS COMPa....ON YOUTH CENTER HANG-OUT WELCOMING 4000 f 3000 INDOOR PLAYGD. FUN 3000 1500 CLIMBING WALL ADVENTURE 2500 2000 30 FOOT VERTICAL. ICE WALL?? SKATEPARK EXERCISE FUN 15000 12000 00 SUB?i 4.. . ?CU."CU~ & !CC711~LML]~Ir`'1t` Alms.::::::. AUDITORIUM (250-300) FILM, LECTURE, ET LISTENING 8000 10000 WITH STAGE & FLY PROFESSIONAL SMALL CONCERT'S THEATER IMAX FILM EXCITING 10000 GALLERY ART DISPLAY ARTISTIC 5000 Su I3 TOT: .A---as i 5i_i?E!%iyij><<ii'i ? i;y i'iiz?'`'`>_zi iii? >i; EFAIL. ANCILLARY RETAIL BOOKSTORE SOCIAL 3000 2000 . DESIRABLE RECOMry1ENDE RECOMMENDED'; FEATURES & HIGH LOWER SPACE PaiOhIT I UNCTION 1=1Cl~ERIENCE RANGE. RANGE GALLERY INTELLECTUAL 5000 4000 OBSERVATION, SAL ARTISTIC 3000 2000 RESTAURANTS (2) SOCIAL 8000 6000 DINNER THEATER 7 SuB TOTAL fixer.... s` i 90oa OFFICES NON-PROFITS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS-LIKE 12000 10000 CONFERENCE ROOM 1 MEETING PROFESSIONAL 400 400 CONFERENCE ROOM 2 200 200 AV STUDIO RECORDING (TV) TECHNICAL 2000 1000 BUSINESS CENTER OFFICE BUSINESS-LIKE 6000 5000 COPYING, PRODUCT INCUBATOR COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY CENTRAL COMPUTER CORE FUNCTIONAL 1500 1000 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DISTANCE LEARNING 22. DO.:: .:::>::;;:::::>;::»>:60C : ~U;;, . A .RETAJ ; APARTMENTS (@ 1000 SQ.FT) FULL-TIME LIVING HOME 12000 i 12000 12 FOR SALE CONDOS PART-TIME LIVING 2ND HOME 60000 60000 . . t.u~.aret3uNmc ;360fl:: If'AMEiI1TIES`::''; PARcf G N PARKING SPACES (@ 200 SQ.FT) PARKING SKI STORAGE 154000 154000 770 PARKING FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT 26000 26000 30 1 1. ARK.rv 0000: YFi t .Il+l'I" R1 R.#?!tt~) C' f ACES:.: _ ' MAIN LOBBY OBSERVATION VAIL'S FRONT DOOR 6000 5000 CONVERSATION ROTUNDA-LIKE PEOPLE CONNECTIONS WATER FEATURE SMALL LOBBIES (5) CONVERSATION CONNECTIONS 1500 1250 QE$IRew RECC1~v1MENDE RECOMMENDED, Fd1URES:.Bt;.: HIGH ~011YEF SPACE Pxtour FUN ,:u,,l E7[PERIENCE RANGE RAIVGr; KITCHENS (10% OF Mae. .LNG SPACE) FOOD PREP FUNCTIONAL 9685 7400 STORAGE ROOMS & CLOSETS (5%) STORAGE FUNCTIONAL 4843 3700 ; UB.. . •EQIALOTII R1FMtt*+tIQRPUali a,~cES ZO28 (.1;7350: THER' EXTERiOt PtJBL[C SOwpES'.>;::.>:::>::: OUTDOOR ICE SKATING FESTIVE, FAMILIES 10000 7500 GARDENS SOCIAL CONTEMPLATIVE 5000 4000 OUTDOOR ROOM MEETING FRESH AIR 5000 4000 SOCIAL COVERED DROP-OFF ARRIVAL WELCOMING 1500 1000 E. LIONSHEAD CIRCLE AUTO TRAFFIC 0 0 PLAZA FOOT TRAFFIC LANDSCAPED 45000 35000 LOADING DOCKS FREIGHT FUNCTIONAL 4000 4000 UNIQUE ACCESS ue.'FO I.tr~r"S l Trl;Rl k I~vaticSPr~c. s TOTAL SQUAREFti.he¦r.GEHY.SCEI~fAR10 559978,;, ; _ 485350: 0 TI~N.& 11~IECHAN[CAI. 15/0 , ,:72 S03 a>> k UAIRI..:: c.::.»<<:::.><:::>:::>::>«:<::;:::`>:;<:>::>: 39..4... _ . Appendix D This appendix contains the mapping for the Vail area. The mapping lays out the alignment of Interstate 70 (I-70) through Vail. The mapping also shows the location of the noise receivers identified in Chapter VIII: Noise. A solid circle indicates the location of each receiver. Each receiver location is labeled with the receiver number as well as the existing year 2000 noise level. Page 2 of this appendix details the overall configuration of the mapping with a schematic. The schematic identifies each sheet by number and identifies the placement of the sheet in the mapping configuration. The individual sheets are numbered corresponding to the schematic. The sheet number is located in the lower right portion of the border. The sheets are laid out west to east. Not all of the sheets are included in this appendix. Only the sheets containing receiver locations or noise contour lines are presented. The noise contour lines are represented in the mapping by thick dashed lines. The noise level is indicated by the line style. The contour lines are labeled on each sheet. A~. TOWN OF PAIL Noise Appendix D 0 Figure D-1: Numbered Sheet Configuration with Receiver Locations 1 / 2M l 113 I 4 { ' Rao •rxu b RI~ rye 8 •Rx+ 1 ~-3- ° 1~ East Vail tt1 •RZS R94 IRQN . ,MO IIR 9 • 2 _ West Vail f~2 1'4 1 22 III+ ac R4 7 8 //cu' Rs • i • R4 + 3 0 ` 33 R" 4 N i ' K-4~7/ / Receiver locations with noise levels currently in excess of 66 dB(A) are bolded Z 0 m mR• f f111N f f1f•• • •rr~ f ¦m fY/ a aa, f m¦r f nrr ¦ fM•r f 'J ,l%~~ j / ir; .'1 l j /fir%/s i.. y. -ar~4l>•e!-.L~` i _..`Ir,- r r / ~ ;r/ f~ ~ P /,'J/F c \ y /Jy c9 \ • f ~ .ice . r r I u l i %/~y !s / r,Y .F~ six .7G~ a 3~'''''7 °~yr - ~/i.,., ~ •it/, /~a - y..1\~, 4z rl a y !~%//rte`, / i~. //`/xc• Ar a /,f5 / l,~r .r~i~ r r T. k 4' I / / s / i r <:d,,j/~~s.,,.a^~'~~'',,~//, / / ,i/ - ` ern / /~c ~ r,/ xr r' -.yti~ /~~y`-,.M-•'s,- 'vr'r~Sf~Y" (rP% I !l/f~ / fl) it .fr. •;!l'ir --w. i ;y. F r rr+ I e. >4 % r ,I rA» dry- i% s-G~'"~"s/' } r; y /L ' ,I i/S i 1 tlli, ( i l oroC ,-1, /rt~f !i J ii p~ ~ ! u i% / ----i ~ \~-yfr~ / '4 ,1~_-.. ~ ~ ~ i j/ ~ ~ !.I 1 ,1`'' Z`I1 ~+I ri SmEs / • t Illpl NO FEET : - a' GATE OF FIgT00MP11T OOTom T.Im 1 1 I 1 I 1 • Itif firs frlfi •1. fm Yr wmxm m us, rur• M h11 A ¦1~ 1. tr1. E riM 1ff rYA fff¦fif 1¦ • f¦Ir h O I P.M. TOWN OF VA I L r =A I ~~0 •rfric~ifm ffa~~[~w•ioi¦r am~pe~slk r r . a R r•s r u fi fiRrir~.~¦¦ VAIL COLORADO sm x a n '°`"""w'""`m""` ` • ° smfr now" f+ •ta •s mm tar fra r r rwrfi . , ~ . nvi e¦~r • ew¦w • ¦s • ¦a~ • ar. • ¦a• • m¦r • am¦ • • 1 I I I I I S F }}~i ¦ fOALE~ I IKK . 100 FEET ,I GATE OF MgTO01UM OCTOIEII T. "I A IV, ¦r w ICI ww• rea m w¦ u¦ mw r r. Wit. •arw • ~ irl • t • • I .r ¦twlr wnwl r r ors wa ww rY n MI"° n r {I ~rrwruwrrvrarrsrrn M!A ON mwvL w r i¦ r a • ru ¦ 1= r¦w¦. r.. ,.,o r TOWN O F V A I L y r S°~' . m••sirrlnrwr rw~~,w ¦orwt s r w a ¦r wl¦ s rr~ ¦ar. r? err AN ¦umc w IN r rr NUNN ~s VAIL, COLORADO ¦ SMMT30W3T VMMI. SIO`"WIN r¦""¦mMINNr` r¦ w wun rniow a r ¦•wfli Rflrf f frlr f R~• f f~• i rw ~t r Qafr i QUIb i fiffi• i R•Iw f t _ ! r r, J • , / i ' ! i ; ; r r ;Sl tir. t}„~ n .~-y .,x • i " : o-r,' n" ' ' ~ 7r /r ~r !r / i : ' t ' 71,; S J -rm;~_ _ - I c j r •r /•t ~{{{jjj L°` Lss", (,6'"' ' a t•. /i• i /mar/litr//!: 'f, i•^y T._'y~!(~i~ }.,nth x ,j ~ ~,r./i r r r r r . / 1 ty ,¢S 7 aY i.4!-.{' I ,I •i fv, r%/;!, t;!'i-~ r ~ d/ 5f /~~.'i ~r 'rF ~'~y,~;J 'K < t~•~ °ir ~ f ti !~1 .i ~ ;!r _ r f /r~r,,~ . ,ter ; . 7 •~i r , cf? / .ice /g / / .s'3 s .sr/.-;-=": 'x 3y'.~!' Vii` Y~ i~~i~1~' J lrt..~ r d: °/iil~/~''~ r/ ~f 1 1 ' / , • X s :~'4 \ 1 \ ,y[.. n _ '4 ''`5. ~,T.; •,i ~ C k// S'~, / e(J j/ fj N / J Y ~/~c{/ ~ ~ ~II q//~ /y? .y'• 4\ ~ \ - ~ -"r - 2..~J ~ '~~/j./ r kr ' 'oa/ y s ~ / rr/r ~ ~'rr - 5 1 - ~ / f - rr i. rr jrr, n/,qi'Jrrf~f \ 'e•~,' \ tt„ \ - , \ a \ Il.,.-. ,X '-.`.e r r Jr / ,p i~r rr ~ / ' R I I .r \ ~ - - `x \ ` ? i~ r~rJi rry $~/j; ~ tr/ 1 r / ¦ ''.~~,%;G--. ~ I I tl, ~I t ~ \I i r / ~t, _ . .1~ / /,4,~/' ~ji r~-.FY"..°lr r/ t ~ ~ x • ~r -s=KS' I i ~ - - ` , c r~_,,.~ I , I ft / /r/ ''idi //p~ /,;,1.. r,, r r . ' - / I I I r q°,'44,\i - ~ ,:1 i ~ i t 1 \ r ~ i~ r 1 I ~r i~ ` ` rl ~ I iCALE~ ! r t'~ _ 1 , . - \ . _ riN!rj%. l:,? ) f f t r % I 1 INp1 100 MET i - --.Y - /;/i y?,s/._r` \ r ~t 1 fi!?Mq.% / ~1 ~I r r'It, trl. r//?Y 6' f f 1 j '~'r` /i/,r'/ t pJ I i sc*r j f!// / y' 'r: :v / % 'r/ j.F 1/'./~ Ij"} r~ r ,I'i. I GATEW PHOTOORAM vd, ! ^-.?r-. - _ ~ / ` - / i J _ ~.VS~ f.~~''• /~r/' / ~ / I III .I . \ I Ia t s I t'I t~ OOrOOER T.I!!I ' !Y y "e,^ / . Al,. / - , i.~" ~ y yj r~i / '»m ~d~Y" 'r? l,/ff J ~~m.^, i~'1 ~ r ~I~ ~ , r -1 r E j I r I I t I I . ~ ~/°'i~~~.~'`~"{r..- `J / / /.:s~s ' ~ ice'-•%'~'~ icy _'~`a ~~''r'"r~'~ !Ik" %~r''~" /r `r 1 / f r ri ~ r .y, \y.f x rr ///j~ % % j~%'l / ar' !,;wL?' r:r/ j' .w~ x / 6Y 'a// _ _5., . / ''m• ,rte ~j"~ '`x f! .i}.,,. ~/y i I / iw1 ~f'a2.~m'a/'. .emu s„-,o. J jst / _ t l;.s• -45 ~ ''a°,+`,,~''' ~/'f~ / "/i•^ jf 1,; ~ ~ r', ! ar,'.. L _l_ _..,J/ )sr+ ..L'c ~r ,-xr `~?.r/.I~.., E Si' :~..X ~;'gPY''. ' I I. W/r tsr r ` ' ' ~r trig m wa t+ rmm. m ru. mmm i • t • d~.+r{~f~ fm rnrr wws m r ots n ru r ~~M0 ° r tmrriruwrn rtrarrrr•mrrtrr••~r rff•r~rssa•rfir~+•r'. ~a.rfor _ TOWN O F V A I L v ~'~"'m •uair • mefsrtr itn f~~~wfwe tfr ft r r M~Ora lYlm r~~lrrr Y /r v}Ai A lfi f{rr ilr /1~If• f 7 VAIL, COLORADO MoFn "'m"""mw-am a rf~/s sasrwna wr rmr:mr frt~iw~fer~.• , fiiYr71L www [ [Iiww [ wa•• [ wo~• [ eiw w trrw [ [Iwr [ wwr [ wwr [ S i I ` 1 i \ \ \ \ \h ~e r r ~ ~r/r Jit 'rig s '>s~ , \ 1• \\`t~ / r ss / T`/ / r r ii/r /ii ~r t ~'r/ ilf iii//~/i~~ - /rj//,~i ,rrr. f - y / \./•k; / \,x` :,r// } i I r err/ /~/df ~ r/~/ ~ 7~ -vc Il~il j':.-~ ~ r \ \c /i.~'/i i ~ - ~ r ,.j ~`f r9,a ~ f• ~ • fCALEt i I Z• rr / 3 r f 1INCH 100 FEET il'~ I III I I { ` d 60` J a ¢r ,wfi°' r s r Js ~ r /r. r 1 r i , r i' 1 I 1 r I .yr:. ~.--^1 E'F ? r; r / !r % ~ ~ I¢ ~ q. I 7 f c+y ss DATE OF PIgT00RM1Ys OCTOBER 7. IM I ~I it I I+r ~ //~j~j ~/~io, r .r >f rr i _ r/r •,.'';^`%/j lh, /r ~i y r J . I'rJ I I ~I)l /fI jrllJ + ~ r , %r~ i r e,. / ; i / J/ ~ Yyq' fir' r/ r rrr'"- ~/r/ / / j : r! ww ~ Irr /1 Yy - -~Jr , j+ r r i r/r s,'' r r'~ r~! J i~i. i/ r . •a ' / ~i/ /I~/:I,:~'!%`9,~; r riri ~ ` j ~ ~~.~/~,ri~~ i / rpw rsr w r+rao mm owes m we uw wenw. we. ww rrw [ 1 • f • • ww •.wr 11mw a r mm wr r• wrow w TOWN OF VA I L u....rm n w { I sepiwrva it woar. w rr ir'rw wrr mrw[rerrww•~rr~w. rra[•a~urx w [ice ierrw[ w a r n wr w w w •u r ~nw w wi o•I••r.r rover ~wr1 VAIL, COLORADO w SOVIET saF Ta ew.a lllel•wwrn•ww lwNr~.nor w.Iww o~rlw r r w w w&-.Me "IN rem : r r .w.o w w w.es.oo u r.•w.er W6 14,14. bo utf&-t Overview of Building Fire a odes e Town of Vail, Colorado Town Council Work Session ~J Tuesday, December 12, 2000 r ` Gary Goodell, Chief Building Official Building Safety & Inspection Services Community Development Department Michael McGee Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal _ Fire Prevention Town of Vail Fire Department l 1 y1 tl Y'e ~t e Is~i 1 er i t btrziity cl._ b and bo iri but fails.to h ~c~ 01 e YuTa~ , rt~l'dirt eon'struetu7n 'provide `'afety'standat ds'& re4461ate Ices,,tfi c -,r t kiuild~ng construction. r, matically. lirkl,, Of flict.. ions where a e Ytisas ,community sdte Apr oiItl)I ct ncv set r~ R. f yv . A ~IH FY ~ 5 dr`„~ ~Y 5 ~ AV1'~ C• .5.. Y'} ep~ '•3 d 05sasters des Oon Mnsto ° Collapse of Roman amphitheater, 27 A.D., 50,000 injured or killed. Regulations enacted for the safety of public places. • Rome burns, 64 A.D. • Assize of Buildings enacted in London, 1189. Regulated method of building party walls. Placed a high value on stone construction. • Wooden chimneys prohibited and chimney inspectors appointed in New York, 1648. Regulations "obstinately and carelessly neglected by many of the inhabitants," and wooden chimneys and thatched roofs ordered removed in 1657. • Great Fire of London, 1666. Partial destruction of 15,000 buildings. London Building Act enacted too late by Parliament Already obsolete and no effective enforcement. 7 Disasters & Codes in History, continued • Fire district established in New York, 1766. "...all buildings shall be made of stone or brick and roofed with tile or slate." • George Washington and Thomas Jefferson involved in establishing construction laws for the nation's capital. Initial requirements for exterior & party walls of brick & stone modified to allow wood frame structures up to 12 ft. in height and 328 sq. ft. in area in order to house construction workers. • First real building codes appeared in 1862, plumbing regulations in 1880, regulations for elevators & hoists in 1883. Height of nonfireproof buildings limited beginning in 1885. 20th Century United States Fire Disasters: 1903-Iroquois Theater, Chicago-602 killed. 1908-Lakeview Grammar School, Cleveland-175 killed. 1911-Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, New York City-145 killed. After this famous fire, the Safety to Life Committee, the first step toward stringent modern fire codes, was formed. 1937-Consolidated School, New London, Texas-294 killed. 1942-Coconut Grove Night Club, Boston-492 killed. This notorious fire led to improved fire and building exit codes. 1946-Hotel Winecoff, Atlanta-119 killed. 1958-Our Lady of the Angels School, Chicago-95 killed. 1977-Beverly Hills Supper Club, Southgate, Kentucky-165 killed. Fire protection was insufficient in this most deadly recent fire in the United States. 1980-MGM Grand Hotel, Las Vegas-85 killed. 1981-Keansburg Rest Home, Morganville, New Jersey-31 killed. 1990-Happy Land Social Club, New York City-87 killed. i M u ~ ~ r r N ~~y r I(N w v ~ r . ent" .b e'er r , M,x si \~s n r o- F i ` L ~a 1 ~4 ir C.. ~r t r re a g 1 21 - 228 _ 23 The Code of - Hammurabi, 232 Babylonian Empire, 2000 229 B.C. _ 229: If a builder has built a house for a man 233 and his work is not K rte- strong, and if the house he has built falls 230 _ in and kills the householder, that builder shall be slain. i Development and Evolution UNFORM of the B Uniform Building Code I ~s (UBC) f I^ LI 7 Development and Evolution of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) • Begun in California by an organization of local building officials. • Prompted by idea of using a common code so that each jurisdiction didn't have to draft it's own building code from scratch. • Also benefited architects, engineers, contractors, homebuilders and the rest of the design & construction industry because multiple cities and counties used the same code requirements. • Organization expanded to the Pacific Coast and then became the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). • First Uniform Building Code (UBC) published in 1927. Evolution of the UBC: The Code Development Process • Anyone may propose an amendment to the code. • Only building officials and fire officials may sit on code development committees or vote on changes to the code. • The design and construction industry, materials suppliers, testing laboratories, consultants, etc., provide a great deal of input into the code development process. • This is a nationally recognized consensus process, that arrives at reasonable, feasible minimum safety standards for the design and construction industry. • Code development committees hear proposed changes at annual hearings. Final decisions on proposed code changes are voted upon by code officials at a separate annual conference. Building Code Summary • 35 chapters + appendices + a, P,~Z~ I standards 3 volumes, 1,292 pages Maximum Allowable Area and Height System Based Upon Combination Of: • Occupancy (type of use) & relative vulnerability of occupants or hazard posed to others. • Type of Construction (combustible or non- combustible materials, fire-resistive or non-rated construction, etc.) Some Common PWOMI "Triggers" for Various _ Life Safety Features in Buildings... Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems. Hotels, condos or apartment buildings three (3) stories or more in height or having 16 or more dwelling units or 20 or more guest rooms. Noncombustible, Fire-Resistive Construction. Generally, buildings more than four (4) stories in height. High Rise Construction Requirements. Business or Residential buildings having habitable floors that are more than 75 feet above the lowest point of fire department access. Limits On Use of Wood on °w Exterior of Larger, Taller F Buildings Generally buildings 4 or more stories in height may have substantial amounts of wood on the exterior only if all of the following requirements are met: • Walls front on streets or yards having a width of 40 feet or more. • Bulkheads below show windows, show-window frames, aprons and showcases may be of combustible materials, provided the height of such construction does not exceed 15 ft. above grade. • Wood veneer of boards not less than 1-inch nominal thickness or exterior-type panels not less than 3/8-inch (9.5 mm) nominal thickness may be applied to walls, provided the veneer does not exceed 15 ft. above grade, and further provided such veneer shall Limits On Use of Wood on Exterior, Continued :x be placed either directly against noncombustible surfaces. or furred out from such surfaces not to exceed 1-5/8 inches with all concealed spaces fire-blocked as provided in Section 708. Where boards, panels and furring as described above comply with Section 207 as fire-retardant-treated wood suitable for exterior exposure, the height above grade may be increased to 35 feet. 601.5.5 Trim. Trim, picture molds, chair rails, baseboards, handrails and show-window backing may be of wood. Unprotected wood doors and windows may be used except where openings are required to be fire protected. i/ Focus of the U-WORK BUILMNIG Building Code... • Primarily regulates new construction. • Also some maintenance issues with required life safety features and systems. In Vail, we also deal with a great deal of new construction in existing buildings. Appeals to the Building Code 104.2.7 Modifications. When there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this code, the building official may grant modifications for individual cases. The building official shall first find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical and that the modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of this code and that such modification does not lessen anv fire-protection requirements or any die ree of structural integrity. The details of any action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the code enforcement agency. Appeals to the Building Code, Cont'd 104.2.8 Alternate materials. alternate design and methods of construction. The provisions of this code are not intended to prevent the use of any material, alternate design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by this code, provided any alternate has been approved and its use authorized by the building official. The building official may approve any such alternate, provided the building official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of this code and that the material. method or work offered is. for the ouroose intended. at least the eauivalent of that n_ rescribed in this code in suitability. strength. effectiveness. fire resistance, durabilitv. safetv and sanitation. Appeals to the Building Code, Cont'd The building official shall require that sufficient evidence or proof be submitted to substantiate any claims that may be made regarding its use. The details of any action granting approval of an alternate shall be recorded and entered in the files of the code enforcement agency. 4.2.9 Tests. Whenever there is insufficient evidence of compliance with any of the provisions of this code or evidence that any material or construction does not conform to the requirements of this code, the building official may require tests as proof of compliance to be made at no expense to this jurisdiction. Building Code Board of Appeals SECTION 105 - BOARD OF APPEALS 105.1 General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretation of this, code, there shall be and is hereby created a board of appeals consisting of members who are qualified by experience and, training to pass on matters vertaining to building construction and who are not emplovees of the jurisdiction. The building official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote on any matter before the board. The board of appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the building official. Building Code Board of Appeals, Cont'd 105.2 Limitations of Authority. The board of appeals shall have no authoritv relative to intemretation of the administrative provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive reauirements of this code.. Development 1997 UNIFORM and Evolution RRE OD of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) The Uniform Fire Code (UFC) was first published in 1971 as a collaborative effort by the Western Fire Chiefs Association and the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). 1997 Development UNWORM and Evolution PRE CODE' of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) First fire prevention code written to promote cooperation between the building department and the fire department. Correlated with the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Uniform Fire Code Summary • 90 articles, or chapters + standards + appendices 1997 • Administration & Enforcement. UNIFORM FIRE r. CODE • Means of Egress. • Fire protection systems. • Storage & handling of hazardous, combustible, flammable and/or toxic materials & processes. • Maintenance of life safety features & systems. 1997 U'um Focus of the Uniform CON" V- L Fire Code (UFC)... Fire prevention codes focus primarily on EXISTING BUILDINGS,... • the activities that take place in them, • the materials that are stored and used in them, • the special processes or events that may take place, and -the preservation and proper maintenance of life safety systems, such as means of egress, alarm systems, fire sprinklers systems, required fire-resistive wall and ceiling assemblies, etc. 1; UNWORIM Focus of the Uniform RRE CODE' Fire Code ® (UFC),..cont'd L_ g-E0 Fire prevention codes also overlap with the Building Codes in regulating new construction, including new alarm systems, automatic fire sprinkler systems, other fire suppression systems, smoke management systems, etc. Appeals to the Fire Code 103.1.1 Technical assistance. To determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials and uses ...a building or premises subject to the inspection of the department, the chief is authorized to reauire the owner or the person in possession or control of the buildinea or premises to provide. without charge to the iurisdiction. a technical opinion and report. The opinion and report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer, specialist, ...acceptable to the chief and the owner and shall analyze the fire-safety properties of the design, operation or use of the building or premises and the facilities and appurtenances situated thereon, to recommend necessary changes. The chief is authorized to reauire design submittals to bear the stamp of a professional engineer.. Appeals to the Fire Code, Cont'd 103.1.2 Alternate materials and methods. The chief is authorized to approve alternate materials or methods provided that the chief finds that the proposed design. use or operation satisfactorily complies with the intent of this code and that the method of work performed or operation is. for the purpose intended. at least equivalent to that prescribed in this code in auality_ . strength. effectiveness. fire resistance. durabilitv and safetv. Approvals under the authority herein contained shall be subject to the approval of the building official whenever the alternate material or method involves matters regulated by the Building Code. Appeals to the Fire Code, Cont'd 103.1.3 Practical difficulties. The chief is authorized to modify any of the provisions of this code upon application in writing by the owner, a lessee or a duly authorized representative where there are practical difficulties in the wav of carrvina out the provisions of the code. provided that the spirit of the code shall be complied with. public safety. secured and substantial iustice done. The particulars of such modification and the decision of the chief shall be entered upon the records of the department and a signed copy shall be furnished to the applicant. Fire Code Board of Appeals 103.1.4 Appeals. To determine the suitability of alternate materials and types of construction and to Drovide for reasonable interpretations of the -provisions of this code. there shall be and hereby is created a board of appeals consisting of five members who are aualified by exnerience and training to -pass iudement upon Dertinent matters. The chief shall be an ex officio member and shall act as secretary of the board. The board of appeals shall be appointed by the executive body and shall hold office at their pleasure. The board shall adopt reasonable rules and regulations for conducting its investigations and shall render decisions and findings in writing to the fire chief, with a duplicate copy to the appellant. 1997 Some Shared Boom FIRF CODE,,,~ CODE' Features of the UBC & the UFC • Common Reason for Existence: Public Safety and the Prevention of Building-Related Disasters -Means of Egress (Exiting) Requirements - Sprinkler System Requirements - Life Safety Requirements for Existing Buildings • Cross References • Promotes cooperation between Building Safety & Fire Prevention MINIMUM NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED SAFETY STANDARDS "The primary intent of building regulation is to provide reasonable controls for the construction, use and occupancy of buildings... Thus such codes are minimum in nature, and under the provisions of the 'police power' cannot legally be made to require construction of a quality excessive of that which is necessary to furnish a reasonable degree of safety... Codes must be based on what are generally accepted as good standards of construction. Only those provisions which are reasonable, practical or necessary can be legally enforced." Building,Denartment Administration k-~ by Robert E. O'Bannon 441 L J ~i t' #1 'Communit Value / i $~r VAIL, FROM A PERFORMANCE-BASED CODE PERSPECTIVE... • Identify the characteristics of the occupants and the uses of the building • Predominant use is multiple-family residential (hotels or condos), often with other mixed uses, such as retail, restaurants, etc. in the same building CHARACTERISTICS OF OUR GUESTS & THE BUILDINGS THEY OCCUPY: • Buildings occupied by large • Families? Dependent numbers of people? YES Relationships? SOMETIMES • Buildings occupied for • Do guests voluntarily assume extended lengths of time? YES any risk? NO • Do occupants sleep in the • Judgment impaired? building? YES SOMETIMES • Familiar with building layout & • Buildings meet minimum means of emergency egress? nationally recognized safety NOT ALWAYS standards? SOMETIMES • Vulnerable population? (many older non-conforming GENERALLY NO buildings) ...PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS, CONTINUED Importance of the buildings & guests to the economic viability of the community? VERY HIGH Overall importance of building safety for the community? ABOVE AVERAGE International Fire Death Rates f VAO ~oi U. AN//A llld Ifi~•frt Illllliu ddl 111 I~WI\I France { r}, " j~ Gerrnatty, f/li }!u!!'~!~liii ~~i 1 ! ~!i' ~ . i,.- ~ & s New utaland~.:' 14µi % IMifli I u%lu!~! _ A/!!/ i!!! " ;,x:A.. %'^a ''r. .QU31FQ~16~. 1~~! / AIII•YI~ANIXY !/f^~'" ~;p : W~~ ,,y,•. SOin fF, ~uiW! J i/uoni o! M ey;y q n E ...p.. ; .d•.,.r.", d 012 12 'N 16-18 20 22 'fire Deaths Par MIIIICn Popuiatiorr {7992-1944) "5VI fife st,t tits leiiier,9"u;letin,'Ammak R~ipott "uft'€wt iiited Natipns f'.naiiilittt's'Sri ,611 ~1 5etile'al ; Se te tier' P,o t s~5.rs ~ w ~o w~"iy., :xz "`.=:s::<'ax'. ~.:t: '.'~=,~•~°t :~f,;ss`'~_ alp»Su :;py;~: r~.~K;:~'~• s.. ~ _ .J~Yt 4!I IF„ 1' fr41 11111 4 3~ ti 1 i Y F h. ~ 7iy ter" " 5 ~ xiT r r ` What t Does t4: This All Mean For Vail? • Our building stock is aging and many of our buildings do not meet current minimum nationally recognized safety standards. • It takes a great deal of staff time to assess the life safety characteristics of existing buildings as we attempt to deal with proposed remodels and additions. • Our goal is to improve the life safety characteristics of our existing buildings with each construction project. • We support quality redevelopment throughout the town. Time, Talent, Knowledge & Resources -Well trained, adequately staffed and otherwise well supported departments can actually afford to take a more reasonable approach. • They can devote more time and apply more knowledge and thus often offer or review more creative solutions, more cost effective alternatives, & otherwise serve as a resource to the community. • There is no room for compromise on the level of safety, but there is great latitude for equivalency. Quality vs. Quantity • Issues with quality of plans coming in for review and going out. Also an issue with inspections. • We need to improve the quality of plans being submitted through public awareness and education. • In a similar fashion, we need to improve the quality of construction management on the job site. • Better able to I.D. "red flags," avoid pitfalls, surprises later in the process. J r 1. e. - t `S uyLrr ~t'. YK Y Q f W r N ~ - ~ ~11Jfj 4 l } if^h `fir S ' } : ht[ W6 ra • la • oo \JU gut. UP K VAIL CHAMBER & BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 214 s. frontage road, east, suite 2, vail, colorado 81657 Vail Town Council 76. N. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 December 11, 2000 Dear Town Council: Attached you will find a copies of the letters recently delivered to two of our former Board members. We felt it necessary to relieve them of their duties for the reasons stated in the letters. The Executive Committee was disturbed by the fact that a presentation was made to the Town Council and such presentation's purpose was to undermine the very foundation of an organization whose express purpose is to unify the community. And this action was taken by two members of our own Board. Contrary to what you have been lead to believe, there is always room for dissenting opinions in an organization. More over, we all knew going in to this that there were going to be many points of view that would need accommodation. At our meetings we have attempted to provide a forum for just such discussion. However, it is our adamant opinion that once a decision has been made, it is imperative that the Board be united in its implementation of those decisions. Sincerely, Kaye Ferry Ken Friedman ~t Farrow Hitt Nicole Hoffman Ewing Bill Jewitt \ Steve Rosenthal Steve Simonett ` Cc: Board of Directors VAIL CHAMBER & BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 214 s. frontage road, east, suite 2, vail, Colorado 81657 Vail Town Council 76. N. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 December 11, 2000 Dear Town Council: Attached you will find a copies of the letters recently delivered to two of our former Board members. We felt it necessary to relieve them of their duties for the reasons stated in the letters. The Executive Committee was disturbed by the fact that a presentation was made to the Town Council and such presentation's purpose was to undermine the very foundation of an organization whose express purpose is to unify the community. And this action was taken by two members of our own Board. Contrary to what you have been lead to believe, there is always room for dissenting opinions in an organization. More over, we all knew going in to this that there were going to be many points of view that would need accommodation. At our meetings we have attempted to provide a forum for just such discussion. However, it is our adamant opinion that once a decision has been made, it is imperative that the Board be united in its implementation of those decisions. Sincerely, Kaye Ferry ~;;W 0 Ken Friedman Farrow Hitt Nicole Hoffman Ewing Bill Jewitt /IOf Steve Rosenthal Steve Simonett ~I Cc: Board of Directors