Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2001-03-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, March 6, 2001 NOTE: Time of items is approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. VAIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1:00 P.M. 1) Vail Center Budget. (2 hours.) Russell Forrest ITEM/TOPIC: Preliminary Budget for the Vail Center. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Modify and approve the preliminary budget and program. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: A concept paper has been prepared that provides a vision for the center and a description of how learning can provide a unifying vision for the recreational, meeting, cultural, and community uses contemplated in the center. This concept simply builds upon the significant public input that has occurred to date and originated from the Vail Tomorrow process. On December 12th the Town Council indicated their support for the "concept." On December 19th the Town Council developed a square footage and use "wish list." Based on that wish list staff has developed a budget that includes both anticipated revenue and costs. Staff will also review the costs and implications of modifying the Lionshead parking structure and the parking demand for the Vail Center. Specifically staff would like to receive Councils input on: • Revenue options & • Preferred uses and square footage Council may choose to give direction to modify the program and staff would then come back at a following work session or evening meeting with a revised budget. After a budget and program has been approved, the design team would begin developing a schematic architectural plan. 2) Donovan Park. (30 min.) Todd Oppenheimer George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: The purpose of this worksession meeting is to present the estimated Donovan Community Park construction budget and to respond to additional questions raised by the Town Council at the February 27th worksession meeting. The four items that will be discussed are: • Summary of the 2/27/01 work session meeting • Review of project budget • Construction Cost comparison of other municipal buildings • Parking area impacts on the preserve area ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to the staff's estimated budget presentation and then use the remaining time to ask questions of staff. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The design team presented a Donovan Park construction process and construction budget update to the Vail Town Council on Tuesday, February 27th . On the 27th there was confusion with regard to the estimated budget. Today's meeting is intended to provide clarity on the current budget estimate. The team anticipates that more meetings will be scheduled on a regular basis throughout the duration of the construction project. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department and the Public Works Department recommends that the Council supports the estimated construction budget and directs staff to diligently pursue the proposed Donovan Park construction project. 3) 1-70 Noise Mitigation. (1 hour.) Greg Hall ITEM/TOPIC: 1-70 Noise Study Report Out. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to the presentation and review the results, ask questions and discuss future steps. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: In February we presented the noise contour mapping and discussed noise mitigation options. Next steps were determine using Geographic Information System the extent of the number of impacted properties, discuss short-term strategies, and relay mitigation modeling results based on CDOT concerns and criteria. The results of the GIS work and the short term solutions are included. Completion of meeting with CDOT environmental, maintenance and construction staff and will by 3/6 and we will report out their concerns. Results of preliminary mitigation modeling samples and possible expected results will be discussed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Listen, discuss, and detail next steps. Determine what if any short term solutions should be pursued. We will model mitigation solutions based on the CDOT input to determine the net result of any constructed noise mitigation and the associated relative costs to construct. 4) Review Council Critical Strategies. (15 min.) 5) Review Evening Meeting Agenda. (5 min.) 6) Information Update. (10 min.) 7) Council Reports. (10 min.) 8) Other. (10 min.) 9) Adjournment. (5:20 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/13/01, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/20/01, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/20/01, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. i ~ ~ x,~~~ To: Vail Town Council From: Russ Forrest Date: March 6, 2001 Subject Vail Center Capital and Operating Budget 1. PURPOSE The purpose of the March 6th worksession and evening meeting is to review the attached business plan for developing the Vail Center and to ask for the Town Council's direction on that plan. Specifically staff is requesting Council direction on: • The uses and square footage of those uses that should be included in the directions to the design team • The budget for the Vail Center and specifically direction on the revenue plan including the use of property tax, RETT revenue, capital funds, private donations, naming rights, and how parking spaces can be used for a fund raising campaign. 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES • The facilities plan will build upon the community facility ideas and lands that have been identified through the Vail Tomorrow, Common Ground, Lionshead Master Plan, and other community processes. • The facilities programming will complement both recreational (e.g., skiing and mountain sports) and cultural (e.g., art, performing arts) amenities that exist in the Vail Valley so as to create a world class network of community facilities in the Valley. • The facilities shall be outstanding in their design and programming. Potential residents and guests would be drawn to Vail because of them. These should be unique facilities. • The facilities will serve both Vail Valley residents and guests. • Public-private partnerships will be pursued to finance the development of the facilities. 3. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL DECISIONS TO-DATE: • On September 21, 1999; November 16, 1999; and on March 14, 2000 the Town Council affirmed the list of public uses that would be considered further, primarily a 2nd sheet of ice, a family activity center, learning/meeting/performing arts facility 1 (convertible floor space which can convert into either a meeting space or a performing arts/event venue), and affordable housing. • On July 18, 2000 the Town Council eliminated alternative 3 from further consideration. • On August 1, 2000 the Town Council directed staff to move forward with a 2001 ballot initiative. • On August 1, 2000 the Town Council directed staff to: - Foster the redevelopment and enhancement of existing hotel properties near the project site. - Work with VVTCB to encourage existing hotels to commit rooms at a competitive price for meetings and functions. - When refining the design for the project site, identify phasing plans that could allow the expansion of the meeting center and a future hotel in a phase 2 plan if the market demonstrated it was necessary to make the meeting center operate successfully. - Identify alternative mass transit technologies to move people more efficiently along the in-town route. • On August 15, 2000 the Town Council directed the Town Manager to sign a contract with the White River Institute to assist in the development of a fund raising campaign for all the public uses and to also help refine the concept of a "learning center." • On May 23, 2000 and on September 5, 2000, the Town Council decided to stay with the existing design team. The Council did indicate that obtaining a third party designer to provide a critique of the design and to enrich the thinking of the design team would be valuable. • On December 12, 2000 the Town Council indicated their support for the concept on paper. • On December 19, 2000 the Town Council developed a square footage and use "wish list." 4. COST ESTIMATES Two different cost estimators, ARC and Hansel Phelps, have reviewed the Vail Center program elements identified by Council in December and developed cost estimates for those uses. Pleasantly, the estimates only varied by 2%. In addition, an operational budget has been prepared that identifies the economic impacts of the project and the operational costs and revenue for each use. Over the last 2 months, staff and the finance team has also been working with the cost estimators and Arnie Ullvig (the Town's parking consultant) on how much parking is required for the Vail Center. Staff has also received input on how much it would cost to build parking to accommodate the demand generated by the Vail Center and how much it would cost to develop above the parking structure. The following are several of the critical questions and answers that have been addressed over the last several months: A. How much parking is required by the Vail Center? Arnie Ullivig calculates that approximately 250 additional spaces are needed at the Lionshead Parking structure based on the predicted usage of the facility. The most significant demand comes from community events that draws locals into the facility versus meetings or events that attract guests. 2 B. How much is it to create one additional plate of parking above the existing parking structure? The cost for one additional plate of parking that results in a net increase of 350 spaces above the existing parking structure is approximately $10 million dollars. This upgrade could also trigger the need to make other improvements to the structure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Additional cost estimating would need to occur to identify those costs associated with upgrading the existing structure. This alternative assumes that 250 spaces are used by the Vail Center and approximately 100 spaces are used in the fund raising program. C. How much is it to create one additional plate of parking and develop over the existing structure? This was a relatively complex question to determine what additional reinforcement is required to develop an additional plate of parking and development above that plate to help pay for the public uses. This alternative would remove 60 feet on the east end of the parking structure to allow more space for the Vail Center. The total cost for this alternative was $28 million and created additional 388 spaces. Paying an additional $18 million for the opportunity to build above the existing structure and only receive approximately 38 more spaces does not appear to be viable. D. How much would it be to create a new parking structure that generated 2300 spaces? The cost for the demolition of the existing structure and rebuilding a new structure of 2300 spaces or 1100 more spaces gives the best price per parking space. This alternative assumes that approximately 200 spaces would be used as part of the fund raising program and 100 spaces would be needed for fractional fee or condominium development above the parking structure to help pay for the parking structure. This alternative does provide a significant amount of new parking to help address the Frontage Road overflow. However, this alternative is only viable if a private developer chose to develop private development over the parking structure and use the revenue to pay for the new structure. This alternative bifurcates the parking from the Vail Center from a budget standpoint. It could provide additional flexibility for the design of the Vail Center and eliminate the parking cost for the Vail Center program. Based on the above analysis of parking costs, the most viable alternative without private assistance to create a new structure, is to create 1 new plate of parking above the existing structure and limit the Vail Center development to the approximately 66,000 square foot area between Dobson and the parking structure. If a new structure could be built with private assistance then, this could reduce the parking cost for the Vail Center and significantly address the current parking shortfall in the Town of Vail during the ski season. 3 5. BENEFITS OF DEVELOPING THE VAIL CENTER • Development of a community cross roads where residents and guests can enjoy recreation, learning, and culture. • $26 million in additional spending per year by additional business that would be generated from the facility and $1 million in additional sales tax. • The facility will generate an additional 90,000 room nights. • This facility will provide additional business in shoulder seasons and provide greater stability for our employee base. • This will provide additional amenities for guests and residents which will be critical to achieve the Town's vision of being "The premier mountain resort community." • Multiple funding sources will be used to fund the Center and the plan leverages private funding. The Finance team would propose that public funding or the actual collection of additional taxes be contingent upon raising private funds. • Younger seasonal employees have identified creating additional activities as a critical need along with affordable housing to their overall satisfaction. In other words this could help attract and retain quality employees based on survey work the Vail Village merchants conducted. Attachments: A. Business Plan FAcdev\C0UNCIL\MEM0S\01\com 0306 costupdate.doc 4 Summary Vail Town Council Meeting February 27, 2001 $10,350,000 - $570,9000 = $10,350,000 (estimate) - (savings) _ (total) BUDGET HISTORY WORKSHEET Original overall project estimate $10,350,000 Issues and oversights • Incorporate site restroom $ 100,000 • Incorporate storm sewer and Frontage Rd. overlay $ 150,000 • Additional Holy Cross electrical fees $ 50,000 • Potential CDOT, ACOE, and escalation impacts $ 100.000 Team's estimate on 2/27/01 $10,750,000 Council direction and design team's acknowledgement And commitment to budget of $10,350,000 Change to surface parking from structured parking $ (578,264) Revised project total budget $10,171,736 CURRENT BUDGET STATUS AS OF 2/27/01 Revised project total budget $10,171,736 4% Construction contingency $ (397,669) 5.17% Design development contingency $ (513,677) Design and engineering fees $ (1,400.000)** Net budget available for completion $ 7,860,390 *ad justed to balance with current construction estimate. Desired overall project contingency at design development is 9% to 10% of total budget. **includes $66,000 as an estimate to complete redesign of parking. CURRENT PROJECT CONSTRUt, i iON COST ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN Project area Pavilion Sitework Park Surface parking Project total Total construction cost $ 2,671,612 $ 1,406,560 $ 1,993,373 $ 1,788,845 $7,860,390 COST COMPARISION WITH OTHER BUILDINGS Donovan Pavilion Total pavilion cost $ 2,671,612 Less FF&E and owner start-up $ (152.300) Total construction cost $ 2,519,312 Pavilion square footage 6,200 Pavilion cost per square foot $ 406.34 Cost Comparison Qrigim Estimated Project Year Anmur t ration Todaxls Cost Size (S F) CosVS.F. EEdeLibrarv 1996 $3,156,000 46% $ 4,607,760 15,172 $ 304 Avcn Library 1994 $ 3,255,063 55% $ 5,038,838 18,465 $ 273 \/aiI Library 1983 $3,000,000 207% $ 6,195,000 16,000 $ 387 What does this mean? This means that a premium is being paid for the following reasons... 1. Economy of scale. Referenced buildings are 2.5 to 3 times larger. 2. Efficiency of building type. Referenced buildings are multiple story structures. 3. "World Class" design elements such as high structure roof, wood wall finish, more glazing, acoustical wall treatments, and hardwood flooring. 4. "Vail Factor" meaning that, in general, construction costs more in Vail than in other places in the valley. } G A~ l 0 Encroachment Area / C o O C o Edge of Preserve d Area Impact Statistics - Total Preserve Area as Depicted (taken from Donovan Parr Master Plan Amendment): 32,795 s.f. - Total encroachment of hardscape: 2,168 s.f. - Percent encroachment of total preserve area: 6.6 NORTH 0 20' 40' 80' 1 40'-00" DESIGNWORKSHOP Donovan Park 953 South Frontage Road West Preserve Area Impact Comparison Suite 102 Structured Parkin Vail, Colorado o 81567 g Scenario (970) 476-8408 Facsimile (970) 476-8409 3/1/01 a Encroachment - Area / IrZ / 0 Edge of Preserve 0 Area 0 0 7980 Impact Statistics - Total Preserve Area as Depicted: 32,795 s.f. - Total encroachment of hardscape: 7,714 s.f. - Percent encroachment of total preserve area: 23.5 % NORTH 0 20' 40' 80' 1.1= 40'-00" DESIGNWORKSHOP-, Donovan Park 953 South Frontage Road West Preserve Area Impact Comparison suite 102 Vail, Colorado 81567 Surface Parking Scenario (970) 476-8408 Facsimile (970) 476-8409 311/01 11 Iy TOWN OF VA1L Office of the Town Manager CHAMPIONSHIPS 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 1999-VAIL-BEAVER CREEK Memorandum • 970-479-21051Fax 970-479-2157 TM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Greg Hall, Public Works Director Greg Morrison, Chief of Police RE: Short Term Solutions for I-70 Noise DATE: March 2, 2001 Pursuant to the Councils' direction, we are currently exploring alternatives to address the problem of noise from Interstate 70. As you will recall, we are pursuing long-term mitigation solutions and short-term solutions to help address this problem. We have met internally and identified a series of solutions that may provide some relief from this problem. Please note that some of these require the consent of either the Colorado Department of Transportation and/or the Federal Highway Administration. These potential short-term solutions are as follows: New Sneed Limit Reduce the speed limit because traffic speeds directly affect highway noise; thus, reducing the speed limit would have a limited positive effect on reducing highway noise. It is estimated that a reduction of 10 MPH would reduce noise by 1.5 dB. Differential Sneed Limits Difference of speed limits involves creating two separate speed limits for passenger vehicles and for trucks. It is assumed for the purpose of this memorandum that the truck speed limit would be reduced from 65 MPH to 55 MPH. It was estimated that this alternative would reduce noise levels by about 0.7 dB. Sneed Enforcement Recent data indicate that average speeds on I-70 through Vail are approximately 70 MPH, or 5 MPH over the speed limit. A reduction in speed limits from 70 MPH to 65 MPH is estimated to reduce noise by 0.7 dB. -W RECYCLEDPAPER -2- Restrict Engine Brakes Although the Town of Vail already has noise ordinances in effect, the town could explore additional restrictions on engine brakes. While there is currently state legislation that requires all engine brakes to have mufflers, this restriction would place the prohibition on the use of engine brakes. In my conversations with the Colorado Carriers Motor Association (CCMA), this alternative would be vigorously opposed by the CCMA. CCMA feels that based on the grades coming down Vail Pass, this is an imprudent and unsafe regulation. Noise Ordinance Enforcement As indicated, the Town of Vail has noise ordinances in place. This alternative involves more vigorous enforcement of noise ordinances. If the Council wishes to pursue this, it will be necessary to increase the fines for this violation. Town of Vail Noise Study 2001 mma of Results The following results are based on the 2001 Noise Study Data prepared by Washington Infrastructure Services, Inc., and the most recent data available from the Town of Vail's GIS database. Total number of units within the Town of Vail: 9262 Total number of residential units within the 66DBA range: 2374 26% Total number of residential units built in or before 1969 within the 66DBA range: 331 14% Total number of residential units built in or before 1976 within the 66DBA range: 1274 54% Total number of residential units built in or before 1986 within the 66DBA range: 2128 90% _LL 7 6-1 l --Fun Jed- -A&o ZooZ V-Ct-K/\ ~t-cs J'J- a s o -7/q -T_~ ~ -a ~ TABLE B o v Yl V e '4Ur? OLJ Z©G Gt.~ (v e- rLo-X4- n L r /tom W 7.92 6 6 DENVER KNOX CTTOSHERIDAH-BOTH 55 80 at SF 105 9700 21025 21025 In Fml OMipl I'm 6 1.025 DENVER METRO 60TH TO 90TH AVE-E SIDE 55 75 78 MF 34 2000 300 24825 In FnN DMIpI 6.92 6 I-M DENVER QUINCY TO HAMPDEN - BOTH SIDES 55 76 79 MF at 6100 915 33975 CANYON CLUB. CAMBRIDGE SO., SOUTHMOOR In Desipt. Per LNrie &7197.On Type IL not d0Svw. 6.09 6 121 DENVER METRO 67TH TO 611TH AV - E. SIDE 45 73 74 MF 12 600 90 3487.5 0i41 ITym 9 4.03 6 6 DENVER METRO SHERDANTOWAw..t.n,,,-BOTH 55 76 79 SF 71 9400 2115 58025 SRP 97,004 ibf lAlAle B/7197 ratdMiplad 3.82 6 I-070 DENVER METRO TABOR-EAST-BOTH SIDES 55 75 77 SF u 4700 705 63075 NW in STIP. Pw LWM 8/7!97. IM POW W(Utetlt Type 9. Rol yet In design. 223 6 t-225 DENVER ME_ XANAOU WY TO YALE AV - W. 55 72 75 MF 16 1900 285 65925 TYPE 1 PER EAIFONSI Not in S71P 2N 6 295 DENVER METRO WOLFF TO PATTON-H-SIDE ri5 73 76 SF 37 2900 435 7027.5 "(Type 0 226 3 1.070 VAIL VNL. E It W OF BUFFEHR CRK RD 65 71 74 MF 39 1300 2925 7320 470 PREDATES HOMES. I COMPLAINT, moth snP 249 6 1-225 DENVER METRO 2ND TO 6TH AVE-W. SIDE 55 71 73 MF 34 38W 570 7890 TYPE I PER EAIFONSI Noire STIP 151 1 I-0N FRISCO BTWN INTSRCHANGES-BE 65 75 76 SF 17 2500 5625 84525 NMM SnP 1.77 2 I-= MONUMENT N OF PORT OF ENTRY - W. SIDE 65 72 SO MH 16 1000 150 86025 MOBILE HOMES & MONUMENT P.O.E. Nd in STIP 1.74 6 I-= DENVER METRO O YALE TO PARKER RD- BOTH 55 74 75 MF 108 7800 1170 97725 TYPE I PER EAAONSIROD TPAR ER4225)I PBr Rule 6r7N7, Vrtder 4Mnlbwat 155 4 .On HUDSON O SW QUAD OF INTERCHANGE 65 77 78 SF 8 12W ISO 99525 FEDEERAL FUNDS Notts STIP 1.38 6 121 DENVER METRO GRANDVIEWTO BOTH -E SIDE 45 73 74 MF 9 600 135 100875 8.z IAS 6 1-225 DENVER METRO A,w..w .'TO ILIFF- W. SIDE 55 70 73 MF 22 2100 315 104025 TYPE 1 PER EAT-ONSI Bulk 1 3 1-070 VAIL VAR. POST OFFICE-EAST 65 73 74 MF 60 4600 936 113385 Now n STIP 0.92 1 1-025 DOUGLAS CO AT SILVER HEIGHTS -E SIDE 65 72 76 SF 10 1600 240 115785 P. Deb 817197, u-tty woftV. 022 6 285 DENVER UNIVERSITY BLVD WEST-N. 40 73 73 SF 10 2400 540 12118.5 Not in STIP 0.8 1 1-025 CASTLE ROCK 3RD TOM- I- SIDE 65 74 75 SF 10 1000 150 122685 Not in Sn 0.74 4 1-025 WINDSOR SW QUAD WINDSOR INTERCHANGE 65 70 74 SF 35 2000 300 12568.5 Not M STIP 0.65 6 265 DENVER METRO KENDALLJAY)HARLAN-DEPEW 55 72 74 MF 18 I f00 165 127335 CAVALIER CLUB 8 PEACH TREE APTS. NW in STIP 0.63 6 6 DENVER METRO WADSWORTHTO KIPUNG-BOTH 55 75 77 SF 71 11000 2475 15206,5 Notts STEP 059 2 1-025 PUEBLO 2NO T04TH-EAST SIDE 50 72 73 SF 5 900 135 15343.5 Not it STIP OSI 1 I-070 DOWNIEVILLE INTERCHANGE E 6 W - BOTH 65 74 75 MH 39 5100 765 16108 5 W in STTP 0.49 3 W70 GLENWOOD SPGS. HATCHERY RD-N. SIDE 65 73 76 MK 9 2000 300 164085 1-70 PREDATES HOMES Not in STIP 0.45 1 1070 DU`ONT AT DUMONT-BOTH 65 72 76 SF 25 5500 625 17233.5 Not in STIP 0.41 1 W70 IDAHO SPRINGS 3RD ST, TO SH 103-N. SIDE 60 76 79 SF 35 2200 495 177285 Note STIP 029 3 4070 VAIL VNL, AT BALD MIN. TOWNHOMES 65 70 73 MF 10 800 180 179085 1-70 PREDATES HOMES. 1 COMPLAINT. Noi in STIP 029 1 1070 EMPIRE JCT EASTER SEN. HANDICAMP - S. 65 66 69 SU 10 1200 180 18088.5 SPEC. USE AREA (VAC = 57) - EARTH BERN! Per Deb W/97. bens. not sore 0 koy nAiMed. 029 3 1VM VAIL E. OF GOLF COURSE-S. SIDE 65 73 75 SF 13 2000 300 18388.5 Not in STIP 028 2 1-025 TRINIDAD COLORADO AVE TO GODDARD SS 71 72 SF 17 5800 1131 19519.5 AKA COMMERCIAL TO GODDARD im in STIP 024 2 1.075 COLORADO SPGS FILLMORE N. TO D&RGW SPUR - W. S5 69 73 SF 51 2800 420 199395 Not n STIP 023 6 IN6 DENVER METRO YORK TO PLATTE RVR-ESIDE 55 71 72 SF 2 1000 150 200895 NOI M STIP 0.18 2 83 COLORADOSPGS. MEAOOWLAND N.6 S.-EAST SIDE 40 71 74 SF 32 2500 375 204645 MESA GRANDE TO RINSON PL NIA n STIP 0.16 2 83 COLORADO SPGS. HARTFORD TO FOUNTAIN CRK-0 50 70 71 SF 12 2040 300 207645 N01 in Snp 0.13 6 285 OENVERMETRO VANCETO PIERCE - N. 55 69 72 MF 9 1600 240 21004,5 Note STIP 0.11 1 1-025 DOUGLAS CO AT BEVERLY HILLS - W. SIDE 65 69 73 SF 10 1900 285 212895 Not in SRP 0.06 2 93 COLORADO SPGS. N OF FUNTRIDGE-W, SIDE 40 69 70 SF T5 1700 255 215445 RIDGEGLEN d RANCH OR Not it STIP 0.06 2 93 COLORADO SPGS. S. OF MAMELAND - WEST SIDE 40 69 70 SF 8 1400 210 217545 ALPINE PL TO LANDER LN Not n STiP (LOS 2 83 COLORADO SPGS. MORNING SUN - FUNTRIDGE - W. 40 66 74 SF 38 29W 435 22189.5 Not In STIP 0.04 6 1-025 DENVER METRO DEWEY SCHOOL- W. SIDE 55 70 73 BCH 2 2600 390 22579.5 Not in STIP 0.03 6 '-270 DENVER METRO 0 1761127VYORK -SW OLAD 55 69 73 SF 3 1300 195 22774.5 TYPE I WITH INTERCHANGE Rc..,...o .JCTIDN Not in STIP OAt 6 121 DENVER METRO DRGW RR 7064TH-E. SIDE 45 69 70 SF 13 2100 315 23089.5 NM STTP 'kWAjj FOOTNOTES; SF a SINGLE FAMILY, ISR FLOOR ONLY MF a MULTIPLE FAMILY, /ST FLOOR ONLY MH a MOBIE HOMES SU a SPECIAL USE AREA (NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA s 57 dB(A SCN a SCHOOL AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIEE NAC a NOISE AS'--- CRITERIA AS DEFINED N 23 CFR PART 77; CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE PRELIMINARY WITHOUT SPECIFYING ANY PAFMCIRAR CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OR DESIGN .+ar.JCT10N MATERIALS ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT DURING PROJECT DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION COSTS ESTIMATES ARE SHOWN N 1991 DOLLARS. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY AND REASONABLE NESS OF INDIVIDUAL NOISE BARRIER LOCATORS SUBJECTTO DEPARTMENT REVIEW FEDERAL PARTICIPATION W FUNDING NOISE BARRIER nJCT1GN SUBJECT TO FHWA REVIEW COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOWUP [2001 1/23/01 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE (TO THE GREG H.: The load capacity continues to bean issue; Staff is currently getting an updated engineer's rating which is EAST OF THE INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE) is it time to remove the bridge altogether, continue to expected to take a couple months. monitor and control "load", or take steps to buoy up the foundation/support? 1/23/01 VACANT STORES RUSSELL/BOB: As retail spaces become vacant, it is Susanne Chardoul will present to the Vail Chambers and Business supremely better to have storefronts with displays from Association Board of Directors next week, and with their adjacent stores UNTIL the vacant space is rented, endorsement, will present to the membership at their next regular rather than allow them to stay empty. Can the town meeting, March 13th. take a more active role in encouraging landlords to allow this interim practice? EXAMPLE: Covered Susanne thought this was an excellent direction for the VCBA to Bridge Store/Village. support and implement. 1/23/01 NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS RUSSELL/GREG M.: Of the following need of repair- The Club-the corner of the building near the entrance has crumbling plaster. Bob will discuss with property owners. Clark's Market - dried out wreaths on wall. 2/6/01 SKI STORAGE SIGN RUSS: There is a large ski storage sign on the steps to The sign had been removed when Community Development staff was the Kaltenberg Brewery for the lower ski storage. Is over there but has now returned in a couple additional locations. KEVIN FOLEY this legal? Police will cite. 2113/01 VVTCB'S 2002 WINTER GUIDE PAM: Left a voicemail for Kelly Layton Wednesday, Suzanne Chardoul has referred Kelly to a meeting with Ron 2/14, in re: to whether this is a duplication of a Weinstein (Roxy's) who is head of this sub-committee for the VCBA. SYBILL NAVAS fulfillment piece that could be coordinated w/the Vail They will meet Thursday (2-22-01) and Kelly will follow-up on the Chamber and Business Association's "The Guide." result. F:lmcasterlbsalterlagendalfollowup13-6-01 cfu March 6, 2001 - Page 1 COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC 4 QUESTIONS FOLLOWUP 2001 2/20/01 SKI PASS RESTRICTIONS ON BOB/SUZANNE: How can ski pass restrictions be PRESIDENT'S WEEKEND designed during peak periods to strike a balance in the community? SYBILL NAVAS 2/20/01 TOWN SERVICES VS. COUNTY BOB: Supply list for County of Town of Vail services provided, in response to their list of county-wide DIANA DONOVAN services provided to the town. 2/20/01 LIONSHEAD VIEW CORRIDOR #2 RUSS: When does this return to Council? George will draft a memo for the 3/13/01 packet (to be available 319/01) which will suggest a re-surveying of the corridor at Council DIANA DONOVAN direction. 2/20/01 PARKING REGULATIONS FOR GREG H./MIKE ROSE: A note of concern is the Last fall it was discussed as to whether all passes should be reserv 2001-2002 perceived "subsidized" parking rates for down valley ed for Vail residents, property owners, or Vail business employees residents (from a Vail local). OR whether they should be left available to all Eagle County DIANA DONOVAN residents. Council's decision was to keep them available county- wide. 2/20/01 NATURE CENTER BRIDGE SIGN PAM: The professional closure sign promised has not FOLLOW UP: Pam spoke w/Kurt Krieg Thursday, 2/22/01; he appeared. apologized for the delay and said the sign would be immediately DIANA DONOVAN forthcoming. 2/20/01 DEMO-REBUILD VS. REMODEL RUSS: Provide an work session agenda item to review This item has been scheduled for the April 3rd work session. the definition of a demo-rebuild vs. a remodel, based on DIANA DONOVAN the fact several homes the size of "hotels" have been built recently on the golf course. F:Imcasterlbsalterlagendalfollowupl3-6.01 du March 6, 2001 - Page 2 COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOWUP 2001 - 2/27/01 VRD 3 YEAR PLAN PAM: Order 6 copies of the long-range planning FOLLOW UP: Done. The tapes should be delivered within a week. meeting taped by Channel 5 on Tuesday, February DIANA DONOVAN 27th. 2/27/01 NATURE CENTER ON STREET GREG H./GREG M.: The Nature Center is interested in PARKING creating 6-8 parking spaces along Vail Valley Drive to accommodate both employees and guests. DIANA DONOVAN 2/27/01 VRD REQUEST TO EXTEND GREG H./MIKE ROSE: The VRD is requesting the in- IN-TOWN SHUTTLE town shuttle be extended to the soccer field turnaround. DIANA DONOVAN 2/27/01 ICE DOME TO BOOTH CREEK GREG H./RUSS: Explore possibility of moving ice TENNIS COURTS dome to the location of the Booth Creek tennis courts for an interim year-round location. SYBILL NAVAS 2/27/01 LANDING MATS AT FORD PARK GREG H./LARRY PARDEE: Prepare preliminary information re: feasibility of purchasing landing mats to CHUCK OGILBY support up to 700 parking spaces at Ford Park for Council's next VRI retreat scheduled April 10, 2001. Also, extend length of that meeting to Noon (from 2:00 P.M. previously) to 6:00 P.M. 2/27/01 DOUBLE PARKING IN PARKING GREG M.: Are we vigorously enforcing the double STRUCTURE parking violations in the parking structures? Should the signs at the entries be even stronger than they are SYBILL NAVAS currently worded? F:lmcasterlbsalterlagendalfollowup13-6-01 cfu March 6, 2001 Page 3 COUNCIL FOLLOW-UP TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOWUP 2001 J 2127101 HOME DAY CARE RUSS/GEORGE: An accusation has been made by daycare providers that Vail's regulations impede the SYBILL NAVAS ability to provide home daycare in Vail. F:lmcasterlbsalterlagendalfollowup13-6-01 cfu March 6, 2001 - Page 4