Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-08-06 Support Documentation Town Council Evening SessionAMENDED AGENDA TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, August 6, 2002 7:00 P.M. TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOTE:-Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. ITEM/TOPIC: Citizen Participation. (5 min.) 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of July 2"d and 16th meeting minutes. (5 min.) Appointment of Robert Matsuda to Art In Public Places Board. (5 min.) Resolutions #6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Series of 2002, regarding change of signatures on Town of Vail bank accounts. (5 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve resolutions to update authorized signers on bank accounts. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Two employees previously authorized to sign checks and approve other bank trarisactions have terminated their employment and a new Finance Director has been hired. Approval of these resolutions will allow the town to update the signature authority on all of the town's bank accounts to reflect these changes. 3. ITEM/TOPIC: Betty Ford Alpine Garden Awards. (10 min.) Helen Fritch 4, ITEM/TOPIC: Conference Center Update. (30 min.) Frank Johnson 5. Greg Hall ITEM/TOPIC: Parking Plan Introduction (1 hour) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: A recommendation for management of the 2002/2003 season has been prepared by the Parking Task Force. Review the Parking Task Force recommendations for approval and/or modification on August 20, 2002. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Task force has identified 9 goals forthe overall parking plan: Use parking management strategies to reduce the frequency of overflow parking on the frontage road. The target is fewer than 15 overflow days, down from 42 days last season and 50 days the year before. Maximize parking structure utilization through supply and demand strategies to address weekday/weekend and daytime/nighttime needs. Create an inventory of convenient, short-term parking opportunities for shoppers, diners and late arrivals to be accessible throughout the day. Introduce a pilot incentive program to motivate employees to use satellite parking areas Friday through Sunday to increase close-in parking capacity for shoppers and skiers. Augment employee satellite parking program with frequent and reliable shuttle service. F:mcaster//Tcmeet/2002/080602 Introduce new park `n ride incentives to promote ECO ridership from downvalley. Recognize opportunities for increased parking revenues to help offset operational, maintenance and capital equipment costs. Create an effective enforcement program to deter short-term parking abuses. Actively communicate the program to the various user groups. The attachments further outline the overall proposal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Discuss the parking management plan for 2002/2003 season. g, ITEM/TOPIC: Town Shop Addition Bid Review. (20 min.) Greg Hall ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve to enter into a contract with the responsible low bidder for the Town Shop Project BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The sale of the Old Town Shop to the Eagle River and Water Sanitation District requires replacement of the existing storage. This is an investment in supporting the ongoing operations the town provides. The Public Works Department has prepared a project which replaces the storage and maintains the master plan of the Town Shop Complex. The project has received all the necessary approvals. The project was hard bid to a group of prequalified general contractors. The bids received are as follows: Pf_J_. u~u~. Contractor Total Bid J.L Viele $841,917.95 R A Nelson $980,448.41 Evans Chaffee $973,696.51 FC`I $995,222.09 The project construction Budget is $ 1,100,000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Have the Town Manager to enter into a contract with lowest responsible bidder. 7. ITEM/TOPIC: Slurry Seal Program Bid Review. (5 min.) The town sent the bid out to four different contractors and two of them bid on our Slurry Seal program. They are Intermountain Pavement Preservation LLC and Quality Resurfacing CO. Quality Resurfacing won with the lowest bid. Quality Resurfacing CO Intermountain Pavement Preservation Town of Vail Budget Locations for this project are East Vail District: Aspen Lane Aspen Court Booth Creek Drive Glen Falls Lane Katsos Ranch Road Booth Falls Road Booth Falls Court Bald Mountain Road West Vail North District: Lionsridge Loop F:mcaster//Tcmeet/2002/080602 $ 90,699.62 $ 114,767.00 $ 125,000.00 Buffehr Creek Road Circle Drive Meadow Ridge Road Moraine Drive Glacier Court 8. ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance #20, Series of 2002, an emergency ordinance making changes to Ordinances 2 and 3, 2002, regarding General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds. (5 min.) 9. Matt Mire ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance No. 19, Series 2002, an ordinance establishing Standards and regulations regarding the protection of wildlife. (30 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with amendments or reject Ordinance No. 19. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This issue was discussed at council work session on July 2, 2002. At that time, the council's direction was to come back with an appropriate ordinance. For additional details please see the memorandum dated June 25, 2002 from Dwight Henninger and Matt Lindvall to the Vail Town Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve, or approve with amendments, Ordinance No. 19 on first reading. 10. Russ Forrest ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance #14, Series of 2002, 2"d reading, (10 min.) SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 14, SERIES OF 2002, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 6, VAIL VILLAGE INN, PHASE IV, TO ALLOW FOR THE CONVERSION OF ACCOMMODATION UNITS INTO TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2002, on second reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The applicant, Daymer Corporation, is again requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, to allow for the conversion of accommodation units into employee housing units, and a conditional use permit to allow Type III employee housing units at the Vail Village Inn. This is a temporary request to allow the applicant to utilize the property for employee housing until construction can begin on the redevelopment of the property which was approved in 2000. The property is zoned Special Development District No. 6, with an underlying zoning of Public Accommodation. Any proposal to change use and eliminate accommodation units within a special development district is considered a major amendment. The conditional use permit for the 56 Type III employee housing units was approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission on June 10, 2002, subject to approval of the major amendment by the Town Council. The Planning and Environmental Commission also voted to forward a recommendation of approval for the major amendment to Special Development District No. 6. The findings and conditions of the Planning and Environmental Commission decisions are in the staff memorandum, dated June10, 2002. Ordinance No. 14, Series of F:mcaster//TCmeet/2002/080602 2002, amends the approved uses in Special Development District No. 6, Phase IV, to allow for the conversion of accommodation units into Type III employee housing units.. Building numbers 4 and 5 have been used over the last year for Type III employee housing units. A total of 56 EHUs have been used on the site in both buildings 4 and 5. The Fire Department has ordered that building number 5 (over Craig's market) no longer be used for any type of occupancy due to significant life safety issues. With that order only 26 employee housing units would be available to the owner unless significant repairs are made to building # 5. Since the PEC hearing on June 6th, Club Chelsea has submitted a building application to move into the bar area of the Vail Village Inn. This is allowed by zoning. However it does utilize the available parking on the site STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council approve Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2002, on second reading with the conditions identified in the proposed ordinance. 11. Russ Forrest ITEM/TOPIC: Second Reading of ORDINANCE NO. 15, SERIES OF 2002, An Ordinance amending the official zoning map so that that Tracts I & J, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1St Filing be rezoned from Agriculture Open Space (AOS) to Lionshead Mixed Use -1 (LMU-1) and that Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1St Filing and Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2"d Filing from High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) and Medium Density Multiple Family (MDMF) to Lionshead Mixed Use -1 (LMU-1) in accordance with the attached map Exhibit A.. (10 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2002, on second reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: If approved, Ordinance 15 would rezone the Lodge at Lionshead to Lionshead Mixed Use 1. This area is in the Lionshead Mater Plan area. However, based on a request from the property owners both the Lodge at Lionshead and Vail International were excluded from a multiple property rezoning that occurred in 1999. This was the first step in implementing the Lionshead Master Plan. The property owners of the Lodge at Lionshead are now requesting to be rezoned to Lionshead Mixed Use-1 Zoning. The applicant is not proposing any physical changes at this time. On June 10, 2002, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously recommended to the Town Council that they approve of this rezoning request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council approve Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2002, on second reading 12. Allison Ochs ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance #16, Series of 2002, SECOND reading, regarding Lionshead View Corridor #2. (5 min.) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN CODE, TITLE 12, F:mcaster//TCmeet/2002/080602 CHAPTER 22, SECTION 4, ADOPTION OF VIEW CORRIDORS, BY ADDING TWO VIEW CORRIDORS IN LIONSHEAD AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditions, or deny Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2002, on second reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On May 20, 1997, recognizing the importance of visual connections, the Town Council approved the use of the existing Town of Vail view corridor ordinance to designate the first protected public view corridors in Lionshead. In order to qualify for protection under the Town's ordinance, a view corridor must meet the following criteria: a. The proposed view corridor protects and perpetuates a view from public pedestrian areas, public ways, or public spaces within the Town which fosters civic pride and is in the public interest for the Town. b. The proposed view corridor protects and enhances the Town's attraction to residents, guests, and property owners. c. The proposed view corridor protects a view which is commonly recognized and has inherent qualities which make it more valuable to the Town than other more common views. The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan identifies five view corridors. However, it recommends that only two legally protected view corridors be established. The remaining three views are to be established as critical design parameters, not as benchmarked and surveyed corridors. Lionshead View Corridor 1 is seen from the west, end of the Lionshead parking structure, standing at street level at the main pedestrian exit, looking southwest toward the gondola lift line. Lionshead View Corridor 2 is seen from the pedestrian plaza at the east end of the Lifthouse Lodge, looking south directly up the gondola lift line. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council approve Ordinance No.16, Series of 2002, on first reading 13. Town Manager's Report. (5 minutes) 14. Adjournment (10:10 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2002, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN THE TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2002, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS F:mcaster//Tcmeet/2002/080602 Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. F:mcaster//Tcmeet/2002/080602 ~~v~~ U~ ~ ~~ July 25, 2002 Mayor 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: Letter of Interest to be appointed an Art in Public Places council member Dear Mayor: I'm writing to respectfully express my wish to be appointed an Art in Public Places council member. I am a landscape architect currently employed at Design Workshop, Inc. in Vail. Though I am relatively new to Vail community, the love of these mountains and the lifestyle they offer have brought me deep affection for our town. I consider this opportunity to serve my community to be a great privilege. As a professional urban designer my mission is to bring vitality to a community. As a habitual artist I consider public art to be an essential element to create and sustain that vitality. Public spaces in our town are catalysts to bring people together. Art pieces and well-designed spaces complement each other to provide our visitors with memorable experiences, something to remember us by, and a sense of pride and identity to our local residents. I would very much like an opportunity to participate in the undertaking of evolving Vail into an epicenter of mountain culture. I thank you very much for your time and consideration. Robert Matsuda DESIGN WORKSHOP, INC. C:\Windows\TEMP\AIPP-letter of interest.doc ROBERT MATSUDA Landscape Architect EDUCATION Bachelor of Landscape Architecture School of Environmental Design, University of Georgia, 1998 EXPERIENCE October 2001 -Present Landscape Architect Design Workshop Vail, Colorado January 1999 -October 2001 Landscape Architect Design Workshop Denver, Colorado Summer 1998 Landscape Architect Intern Robinson Fisher Associates Athens, Georgia HONORS AND 1998: ASLA Georgia Chapter Student Design Competition, Third Place AWARDS SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Urban Plaza and Streetscape Bassett Circle, Denver, Colorado, 2000 -Urban residential Streetscape design and construction Promenade Lofts, Denver, Colorado, 2000 -Street front and parking court design and construction Park Tower Condominiums, Denver, Colorado, 2000 -Street front retail patio design and construction Park Place Lofts, Denver, Colorado, 2000 -Street front patio and parking court design and construction Chestnut Street, Denver, Colorado, 2001 -Mixed use urban neighborhood street design and construction Institutional Williams Village, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2001 -Academic residential village master planning and design guidelines Resort Planning Grand Traverse Resort, Grand Traverse, Michigan, 1999 The Ranch at La Quinta, La Quinta, California, 1999 Winter Park Resort, Winter Park, Colorado, 2001 xC~ ' u~ d~g•b •OE' TEA IM For County Clerk and Recorder A Fresh Perspective: New Enthusiasm "I love Eagle County and I know and appreciate the values of the people who live here. They deserve to have elected officials that listen and respond to their concerns. The office of Clerk and Recorder should be user-friendly, efficient and cost-effective, maximizing the return on people's tax dollar." • Long-time Eagle County resident • 20 years of leadership in operational , management & personnel administration in Eagle County • People-oriented; able to lead the team effectively & serve the public with professionalism • Energetic, Resourceful, Positive • Focused, Dedicated, Hard-working. A great addition to the Eagle County team! MORE... ~ The Clerk and Recorder is responsible for managing elections, issuing vehicle licenses and registration, issuing marriage licenses, recording a variety of legal and personal documents, and serving as Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. This position requires a leader with the experience: • to build a strong and capable team; • to deal responsively with problems and concerns; • to set clear and realistic goals and to resolve conflicts; • to oversee multiple tasks and to monitor a variety of staff positions. I am asking you to vote for me on November 5 because I believe I am the best person for the job. I've spent 20 years managing businesses, people, finances and information systems. The skills that I have developed along with my strong work ethic will help me make sure that the residents of Eagle County receive the highest level of service from the office. I'll bring a fresh perspective, some new ideas, a positive attitude and enthusiasm to the job! `I am very pleased to recommend Teak Simonton as Eagle County's next Clerk and Recorder. I am impressed at how adeptshe is managing both personnel and finances. She cares deeply about people, about doing superior work herself, and she lives by her values. She is capable and worthy of the public's trust. " Carl Walker Vail Vote for TEAK SIMONTON on November 5 and lets work together to continue making Eagle County a great place to live! xc: G~uc~-~ THE ~d~-,~`~, ~ - ~0~, ~~ ~ ~~;~ ~,~. ~, ® ~~~-d i C _7 ON BRIDGE STREET ` To: Vail Town Counci 8/6/2002 From: Steven E Kaufma Re: Friday Block Pa I am appearing before you tonight for two reasons. First, I need the Friday Block Parties stopped immediately due to the negative impact it has on the businesses. Second, the VCBA is supposed to be the voice for all businesses in Vail. With the existing leadership in place the business community does not have a forum to speak and get fair representation. Below is a brief synopsis of the events I have been put through and what I have had to do to try to move forward: m Over the past month, I have tried to work with the VCBA to modify the Parties so that they would provide a benefit to not just the bars and restaurants but all of the businesses in the Village. My efforts have been stonewalled and I have been repeatedly misled as to why this must go on. v The Tap Room promoted Friday evening ~ecials in the month of May and June. Attendance was good. When the VCBA Block Parties started at the end of June, our attendance was significantly off This trend has continued, not only for the Tap Room, but also the Red .Lion, Pepi's and other restaurants. I contacted the VCBA in the spring of this year to discuss the status of the Block Parties with the former Director Stephen Connolly. He told me that the VCBA was not sure if the Parties would be held. The Board was still determining if it was going to fund the Lions Head Jammin' Jazz events. It had been determined by the VCBA. President that if the Lions Head events were canceled, so would the Vail Village events. The question of continuing the Block Parties was raised during at least one VCBA meeting that I attended. I do not recall ever hearing that a final decision was made. In July, when it became clear that the Parties were having a negative impact on my business, I again contacted the VCBA. I was told that because of the contracts in place, there was nothing that could be done about the Parties. I offered to buy out the contracts. The offer was refused. I then contacted the sponsors and bands involved with the Parties. I was told by all contacted that either there were no contrails or that they would gladly let the VCBA out of their contract with no hard feelings. • This project no longer serves its intended purpose. Also, it violates the Special Events Agreement that the VCBA and Kaye Ferry have adamantly pushed for the past year. There appears to be a double standard in play. Further, Kaye Ferry has leveraged VCBA business with that of her own personal business of the Grind on several instances with the Block Parties alone. • As the Town is responsible for over 95% of the Association's funding, it is incumbent upon the Town Council to become involved with this issue at this point in time. Let's please address the core of what the VCBA stands for and what they are trying to accomplish. We appreciate the effort and the fact that they have tried very hard to promote and increase business as well as traffic in the local market. When it is clear that something does not work it is the VCBA's responsibility to work with the small businesses and come to resolution. Why can't they honor the very guidelines they fought so hard to put in place? At this time, the way the VCBA is structured and the directors who are in place; this does not help the business community with its own personal agendas and lack of flexibility, but hurts it. Not only am I speaking for myself, but my concern for my fellow business owners who may have a problem in the future and do not have the time or energy to bring to light any concerns. Please remember this when it tome's time to fund the VCBA. Aug-06-02 02:23pro FrarLaeer~raphics 1 ATO 463 4816 T-539 P.OO1N01 F-0T6 Coors Distributing Company 1420 lkwereux Road Glenwood Sprirx~s, Colorado 8 t 601 {970) 945-5406 Vail Chamber Bad Business Associaban Svavct o>~ hectors AmF,tut-~, 2002 It hss wme to our is} aeFe~ v~S tl;et there is some concetrr areaad aspects o£ die ~CBA~ stunmcr 'Block event These concerns have been vt>~ed m us from our ~rsto~ets aao . e 5tre~i and ace specifically celaeod to the offedng of "free" beef d tl3is event ate hoof ~ dicscdy #€ects Friday busiaeas is thtsc accounts. Basta oa these concerns. it is oar wish at this time m withdraw from our current sponsorship gg~oeement as it ptxretos to the ` Patty" tl~eClivt 11ugo~St 8~ 20Q~ Ia compliance ovith our;ponsorshjp meat however we will hottotr in futl the ~3,Of10.00 ~ponsorc6ip bee. please oudc~staod that me have enjoyed being a paenee viirh the event and. vP iii overall ittipottence m the V37tt~e meahaats and Vo the Srl5itt7ig is vat area Iitnvcvcz; m tht uue sense ofpsrtnershig,. with ovr on Bridges S~uectr,ve See! tha>rthis is a eouad and just business dccisioa• We smtenely tgtol4~ Sur nay inr~~r• that may Qatar as a ccsult of ibis deasioo. Should you have any questions, pleas feel fnrr to rnritact me directly ~ ~17~ 94b-540k a211- :~.:;, L~~~ I~ k'apec Geatzal Saps leteasger RESOLUTION NO. 6 Series of 2002 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FOLLOWING AS SIGNERS: ROBERT MCLAURIN, PAMELA A. BRANDMEYER, JACQUE LOVATO, AND JUDY CAMP ON THE FIRST BANK PAYROLL CHECKING ACCOUNT FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL CHECKING ACCOUNT AND THE TRC CHECKING ACCOUNT. PERMITITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp as signers on these accounts. NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: 1. Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp are hereby designated as signers for the Payroll Account, the General Checking Account and the TRC Account for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk RESOLUTION N0.7 Series of 2002 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FOLLOWING AS SIGNERS: ROBERT MCLAURIN, PAMELA A. BRANDMEYER, JACQUE LOVATO, AND JUDY CAMP ON THE US BANK ACCOUNT FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL PERMITITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp as signers on these accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: 1. Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp are hereby designated as signers for the Account for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk RESOLUTION N0.8 Series of 2002 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FOLLOWING AS SIGNERS: ROBERT MCLAURIN, PAMELA A. BRANDMEYER, JACQUE LOVATO, AND JUDY CAMP ON THE WEST STAR ACCOUNT FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL PERMITITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp as signers on these accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp are hereby designated as signers for the Account for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk RESOLUTION N0.9 Series of 2002 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FOLLOWING AS SIGNERS: ROBERT MCLAURIN, PAMELA A. BRANDMEYER, JACQUE LOVATO, AND JUDY CAMP ON THE ALPINE ACCOUNT FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL PERMITITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp as signers on these accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: I . Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp are hereby designated as signers for the Account for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk RESOLUTION NO.10 Series of 2002 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FOLLOWING AS SIGNERS: ROBERT MCLAURIN, PAMELA A. BRANDMEYER, JACQUE LOVATO, AND JUDY CAMP ON THE COLO TRUST ACCOUNT FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL PERMITITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp as signers on these accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: 1. Robert McLaurin, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Jacque Lovato, & Judy Camp are hereby designated as signers for the Account for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk :, Recommended Town of Vail Parking Program Winter 2002-2003 Presented by the Vail Parking Task Force - Goals • Use parking management strategies to reduce the frequency of overflow parking on the frontage road. The target is fewer than 15 overflow days, down from 42 days last season and 50 days the year before. • Maximize parking structure utilization through supply and demand strategies to address weekday/weekend and daytime/nighttime capacity needs. • Create an inventory of convenient, short-term parking opportunities for shoppers, diners and late arrivals to be accessible throughout the day. • Introduce a pilot incentive program to motivate employees to use satellite parking areas Friday through Sunday to increase close-in parking capacity for shoppers and skiers. • Augment employee satellite parking program with frequent and reliable shuttle service. • Introduce new park 'n ride incentives to promote ECO ridership from downvalley. • Recognize opportunities for increased parking revenues to help offset operational, maintenance and capital equipment costs. • Create an effective enforcement program to deter short-term parking abuses. • Actively communicate the program to the various user groups. - Operational Changes • Increase entry/exit capabilities at the Lionshead parking structure. • Increase the number of parking hosts from 5 to 8. • Improve accuracy and increase the number of variable message signs on frontage road and off ramps. • Create direct correlation between paid parking and bus service enhancements. • Provide reliable and efficient shuttle service for outlying lots. - Costs Associated with Operational Changes • Installation of meters at Vail Village $ 60,000 Installation of meters at Lionshead (Charter Bus Lot) $ 15,000 • .Entry/exit improvements at Lionshead $ 45,000* • Parking host staffing increases $ 10,000 • Donovan Park employee shuttle (15 min. service peak) $ 40,000 • Installation of gates at employee lots (4 gates total) $149;6@0"' (OS~ODO • Installation of 2 VMS (variable message signs) on ramps $ 50,000 TOTAL $360,000 Note: Most costs are one-time experises. "Funding approved during last supplemental appropriation. w~Y ~auovs~- - Revenue Projections • Estimated $380,000 increase over 01-02 season collections of $2.2 million. PARKING FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATIONS 01-02 - CLOSE-IN PARKING Vail Village &Lionshead structures, 2,500 spaces Hourly Parking • Pay Upon Exit Rates Fees Are Good 7 Davs A Week 0 to 30 min. Free 30 min. to 1 1/2 hr. $1 1 1/2 to 2 hr. $3 2 to 3 hr. $5 3 to 4 hr. $7 4 to 5 hr. $9 5to6hr. $11 6 to 24 hr. $13 All Day Cap Spaces include all covered parking areas in Vail Village (levels 1 through 3) and all parking decks in the Lionshead structure. Credit cards and cash accepted. Available on a first-come, first-served basis. Metered Parking for Shoppers, Late Arrivals • Pre-Paid Metered Rates, $3 and $20. Rates Fees Good 7 Davs A Week/Village; Sat & Sun Only Lionshead 0 to 3 hr. $3 3 to 24 hr. $20 40 available spaces located on top deck in Vail Village; 17 spaces weekends only at Charter Bus Lot in Lionshead. Available on a first-come, first-served basis. Program will be strictly enforced. Pre-paid meters accept credit cards and cash. Violators will be charged the maximum daily parking rate, plus a $26 fine. Premier Parking • Gold Parking Pass, $1,750. Guaranteed parking in Vail Village and Lionshead structures 7 days a week. Card is available for purchase by the general public; no residency requirement. Employee/Locals Parking • Blue Parking Pass, $750. Good 7 days a week in Lionshead, plus Mon through Thurs in Vail Village and after 3 p.m. daily in Vail Village. Sold to Vail employees, residents and property owners. Parking is available on a first-come, first-served basis. • Green Parking Pass, $450. Good Mon through Thurs in Vail Village and Lionshead, plus after 3 p.m. in either structure 7 days a week. Also good Fri through Sun in satellite lots (Ford Park, Soccer Field & Donovan Park). Available to Vail-based employees who work a minimum of 30 hours per week. Must show proof of employment at time of sale. With each pass purchase, Vail Resorts will provide a coupon good for $200 credit toward a 2002-03 merchant ski pass. Parking is available on a first-come, first-served basis. Vail Village Debit Card. $5 for Vail residents, employees and property owners for use Mon through Thurs in Vail Village structure; $10 on Fri, Sat and Sun in Vail Village. Eagle County resident/property owner rate is $6 Mon through Thurs and $12 on Fri, Sat and Sun. Debit card holders will use an inventory of 180 metered spaces on the top deck of the parking structure. All spaces are allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. Note: parking access to Lionshead requires purchase of a Lionshead Debit Card. Lionshead Debit Card. $5 for Vail residents, employees and property owners for use Mon through Thurs in Lionshead structure; $10 on Fri, Sat and Sun in Lionshead. Eagle County resident/property owner rate is $6 Mon through Thurs and $12 on Fri, Sat and Sun. Debit card holders will access the entire inventory of spaces in the Lionshead structure. These spaces will be filled on a first-come, first-served basis. Note: access to Vail Village requires purchase of a Vail Village Debit Card. Free Parking Programs for Vail Village, Lionshead Structures • Free 30 minute parking • Arrive After 5 (free parking in both structures from 5 p.m. to 3 a.m.) • New Validation Program for Library Users - IN-TOWN OUTLYING PARKING Permit-Only Employee Parking with Convenient Transit Service Gated lots at Ford Park, Soccer Field and Donovan Park, 355 spaces. • Employee Parking Pass, $50. Enables 24/7 access to gated employee lots at Ford Park, Soccer Field and Donovan Park. Good after 3 p.m. in Vail Village and Lionshead parking structures 7 days a week. Vehicles must display a permit in outlying lots. Pass is sold to Vail-based employees who work a minimum of 30 hours per week. Must be employed in Vail Village or Lionshead. Must show proof of employment at time of sale. Ford Park and Soccer Field to be serviced by existing transportation system. Donovan Park to be serviced by existing 30 min. service Mon through Thurs; new 15 min. service Fri through Sun between the hours of 7 am and 7 pm. Note: Donovan Park parking is available for the 2002- 03 season only. Further shuttle service adjustments to be determined based on demand. Free Outlying Parking for All 7 am to 11 pm All areas listed below are serviced by existing Town of Vail transportation system. Frequency varies from 15 min. during peak to 1 hr. non-peak. • North Frontage Road in West Vail, 180 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Red Sandstone Park, 15 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Stephens Park, 15 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • East Vail Interchange Trailhead, 12 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Spraddle Creek Trailhead, 18 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • North Trail Trailhead, 6 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Red Sandstone School, 40 spaces. Available Sat and Sun. • Vail Mountain School, 70 spaces. Available Sat and Sun. • Eagle River Water & Sanitation District Offices on South Frontage Road, 40 spaces. Available Sat and Sun. - FRONTAGE ROAD OVERFLOW PARKING . Capacity of 1,200 spaces. Will be utilized for parking emergencies approximately 15 times during the season with activation of free parking occurring only after the Vail Village and Lionshead structures fill. - ECO PARK `N RIDE OPPORTUNITIES With an inventory of 324 spaces, all areas listed below are serviced by ECO transit with service, depending on the park `n ride lot location, ranging from 63 minutes in travel time from Gypsum to the Vail Transportation Center, to 21 minutes from the U.S. Forest Service Lot at Dowd Junction to Vail. • Berry Creek in Edwards, 128 spaces. Available Dec. 1. Vail-based employees will be offered a $200 park `n ride pass for Berry Creek and a credit toward a 2002-03 merchant ski pass. Must show proof of employment. One-way travel time is 20 minutes. • U.S. Forest Service Lot at Meadow Mountain/Dowd Junction, 100 spaces. Available Nov. 16. • Wolcott, I-70 Interchange, 10 spaces. Available Nov. 16. • Eagle, Chambers Ave., 33 spaces. Available Nov. 16 • Gypsum, Eagle Valley High School, 53 spaces. Available Nov. 16. Recommended Town of Vail Parking Program Winter 2002-2003 Presented by the Vail Parking Task Force - Goals • Use parking management strategies to reduce the frequency of overflow parking on the frontage road. The target is fewer than 15 overflow days, down from 42 days last season and 50 days the year before. Maximize parking structure utilization through supply and demand strategies to address weekday/weekend and daytime/nighttime capacity needs. • Create an inventory of convenient, short-term parking opportunities for shoppers, diners and late arrivals to be accessible throughout the day. • Introduce a pilot incentive program to motivate employees to use satellite parking areas Friday through Sunday to increase close-in parking capacity for shoppers and skiers. • Augment employee satellite parking program with frequent and reliable shuttle service. • Introduce new park `n ride incentives to promote ECO ridership from downvalley. Recognize opportunities for increased parking revenues to help offset operational, maintenance and capital equipment costs. • Create an effective enforcement program to deter short-term parking abuses. Actively communicate the program to the various user groups. - Operational Changes Increase entry/exit capabilities at the Lionshead parking structure. • Increase the number of parking hosts from 5 to 8. • Improve accuracy and increase the number of variable message signs on frontage road and off ramps. • Create direct correlation between paid parking and bus service enhancements. Provide reliable and efficient shuttle service for outlying lots. - Costs Associated with Operational Changes Installation of meters at Vail Village $ 60,000 Installation of meters at Lionshead (Charter Bus Lot) $ 15,000 Entry/exit improvements at Lionshead $ 45,000* Parking host staffing increases Donovan Park employee shuttle (15 min. service peak) $ 10,000 $ 40,000 Installation of gates at employee lots (4 gates total) $140,000 mps Installation of 2 VMS (variable message sign 0 TOTAL 0 0 $36 Note: Most costs are one-time expenses. 'Funding approved during last supplemental appropriation. - Revenue Projections Estimated $380,000 increase over 01-02 season collections of $2.2 million. PARKING FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATIONS 01-02 - CLOSE-IN PARKING Vail Village &Lionshead structures, 2,500 spaces Hourly Parking • Pay Upon Exit Rates Fees Are Good 7 Davs A Week 0 to 30 min. Free 30 min. to 1 1/2 hr. $1 1 1/2 to 2 hr. $3 2to3hr. $5 3to4hr. $7 4to5hr. $9 5to6hr. $11 6 to 24 hr. $13 All Day Cap Spaces include all covered parking areas in Vail Village (levels 1 through 3) and all parking decks in the Lionshead structure. Credit cards and cash accepted. Available on a first-come, first-served basis. - Metered Parking for Shoppers, Late Arrivals • Pre-Paid Metered Rates, $3 and $20. Rates Fees Good 7 Davs A Week/Village~ Sat & Sun Onlv Lionshead Oto3hr. $3 3 to 24 hr. $20 40 available spaces located on top deck in Vail Village; 17 spaces weekends only at Charter Bus Lot in Lionshead. Available on a first-come, first-served basis. Program will be strictly enforced. Pre-paid meters accept credit cards and cash. Violators will be charged the maximum daily parking rate, plus a $26 fine. Premier Parking • Gold Parking Pass, $1,750. Guaranteed parking in Vail Village and Lionshead structures 7 days a week. Card is available for purchase by the general public; no residency requirement. Employee/Locals Parking • Blue Parking Pass, $750. Good 7 days a week in Lionshead, plus Mon through Thurs in Vail Village and after 3 p.m. daily in Vail Village. Sold to Vail employees, residents and property owners. Parking is available on a first-come, first-served basis. • Green Parking Pass, $450. Good Mon through Thurs in Vail Village and Lionshead, plus after 3 p.m. in either structure 7 days a week. Also good Fri through Sun in satellite lots (Ford Park, Soccer Field & Donovan Park). Available to Vail-based employees who work a minimum of 30 hours per week. Must show proof of employment at time of sale. With each pass purchase, Vail Resorts will provide a coupon good for $200 credit toward a 2002-03 merchant ski pass. Parking is available on a first-come, first-served basis. Vail Village Debit Card. $5 for Vail residents, employees and property owners for use Mon through Thurs in Vail Village structure; $10 on Fri, Sat and Sun in Vail Village. Eagle County resident/property owner rate is $6 Mon through Thurs and $12 on Fri, Sat and Sun. Debit card holders will use an inventory of 180 metered spaces on the top deck of the parking structure. All spaces are allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. Note: parking access to Lionshead requires purchase of a Lionshead Debit Card. Lionshead Debit Card. $5 for Vail residents, employees and property owners for use Mon through Thurs in Lionshead structure; $10 on Fri, Sat and Sun in Lionshead. Eagle County resident/property owner rate is $6 Mon through Thurs and $12 on Fri, Sat and Sun. Debit card holders will access the entire inventory of spaces in the Lionshead structure. These spaces will be filled on a first-come, first-served basis. Note: access to Vail Village requires purchase of a Vail Village Debit Card. Free Parking Programs for Vail Village, Lionshead Structures • Free 30 minute parking • Arrive After 5 (free parking in both structures from 5 p.m. to 3 a.m.) • New Validation Program for Library Users - IN-TOWN OUTLYING PARKING Permit-Only Employee Parking with Convenient Transit Service Gated lots at Ford Park, Soccer Field and Donovan Park, 355 spaces. • Employee Parking Pass, $50. Enables 24/7 access to gated employee lots at Ford Park, Soccer Field and Donovan Park. Good after 3 p.m. in Vail Village and Lionshead parking structures 7 days a week. Vehicles must display a permit in outlying lots. Pass is sold to Vail-based employees who work a minimum of 30 hours per week. Must be employed in Vail Village or Lionshead. Must show proof of employment at time of sale. Ford Park and Soccer Field to be serviced by existing transportation system. Donovan Park to be serviced by existing 30 min. service Mon through Thurs; new 15 min. service Fri through Sun between the hours of 7 am and 7 pm. Note: Donovan Park parking is available for the 2002- 03 season only. Further shuttle service adjustments to be determined based on demand. Free Outlying Parking for All 7 am to 11 pm All areas listed below are serviced by existing Town of Vail transportation system. Frequency varies from 15 min. during peak to 1 hr. non-peak. • North Frontage Road in West Vail, 180 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Red Sandstone Park, 15 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Stephens Park, 15 spaces. Available 7 days a week. East Vail Interchange Trailhead, 12 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Spraddle Creek Trailhead, 18 spaces. Available 7 days a week. North Trail Trailhead, 6 spaces. Available 7 days a week. • Red Sandstone School, 40 spaces. Available Sat and Sun. • Vail Mountain School, 70 spaces. Available Sat and Sun. Eagle River Water & Sanitation District Offices on South Frontage Road, 40 spaces. Available Sat and Sun. - FRONTAGE ROAD OVERFLOW PARKING Capacity of 1,200 spaces. Will be utilized for parking emergencies approximately 15 times during the season with activation of free parking occurring only after the Vail Village and Lionshead structures fill. - ECO PARK `N RIDE OPPORTUNITIES With an inventory of 324 spaces, all areas listed below are serviced by ECO transit with service, depending on the park `n ride lot location, ranging from 63 minutes in travel time from Gypsum to the Vail Transportation Center, to 21 minutes from the U.S. Forest Service Lot at Dowd Junction to Vail. • Berry Creek in Edwards, 128 spaces. Available Dec. 1. Vail-based employees will be offered a $200 park `n ride pass for Berry Creek and a credit toward a 2002-03 merchant ski pass. Must show proof of employment. One-way travel time is 20 minutes. • U.S. Forest Service Lot at Meadow Mountain/Dowd Junction, 100 spaces. Available Nov. 16. • Wolcott, I-70 Interchange, 10 spaces. Available Nov. 16. • Eagle, Chambers Ave., 33 spaces. Available Nov. 16 • Gypsum, Eagle Valley High School, 53 spaces. Available Nov. 16. :~ • • M ~ ~,\ - TowivoF vArt, '~ INFORMfATION HOURS :' MON-THURS . FRI-SAT SUN:` _ p . PARKED ~EXCLUDING~~HOLIDAYS ~~~ HQLIDAYS ~ ~ ~~ O - 1:5 FREE 'FREE v m 2`-`3 $4 $6 ~... ` Lost/No.Ticket °$.TO-$1:2%:minimum ~ No' Checks. Please _., F HOLIDAYS ~ ° Dec: -26th.:thru Dec. 31st Q ' Jan 21st and Feti:1'8th N 5 ,. .:GOLD PASS $.1;500 -: for full parking privileges Urirestricted,.guaranteed parking iri both. structures BLUE I'ASS:$5.50 -for multiple visits per day Seven days unrestricted at ljonshead structure: Vail Village ~restrieted Fri-Sun aril identified holidays. Only valid for. Vail residents and employees: VALUE .CARD -perfect for one visit ,per day $5 per'wisit for a resident or employee of Vail: and $6 .for-Eagle County residents::A $S.O minimum purchase. Seven days unrestricted in Lionshead. Double charge to ' ... card for Fri ='Sun and identifed holidays..Any balance remains on'the card for the next season. (Valid driver's license, cqunty 14, pay stop :or tax .bill required) ,., ,. ~. , ':Premier f'arWng==Available Fri Sun and Holidays only ' Once the Vail'Village'has`filled .parking vVill be made '. available on the top`deck`.for $ZO per visit, ~24hour max.) Alway; Free Parking - at the Soccer Field and Ford Park. The first 90 minutes and AFTEfi' 3.: p:m.•.are .free in both parking structures. And there's always a bus! Purchasing Passes = At the Municipal Building, just west of the Vail. Village roundabout, 8 ~.m. to. 5 p.m. Monday through Friday: Major credit cards accepted. ~No adjustments, refunds or discounts to pass prices.) For more. information call 479-2208 Road Conditions - 479=2226 Lost and Found - 479-2208 Attached to this memo is an o.rdin,ance~:which modifies the ordinance authorizing the refunding of a portion of our debt. ° Because of an error in the original ordinance, we are required to adopt this ordinance again. The specific change relates to insuring of the General Obligation Bonds~and will have no impact on the net savings to the town. As an aide, we sold the bonds last.week and the net present value savings was approximately $625,000 as opposed to the $425,000 we had anticipated. This additional savings was generated by positive marketing conditions on the day of the sale. ORDINANCE N0.20 SERIES OF 2002 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2 SERIES OF 2002; PRESCRIBING OTHER DETAILS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado (the "Town"), is a home rule Town duly existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Colorado and its home rule charter (the "Charter"); and WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council") have been duly elected and qualified; and WHEREAS, the Council has previously passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2, Series of 2002 on July 16, 2002 (the "Prior Ordinance"), authorizing the issuance of the Town's General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, because it was determined that obtaining municipal bond insurance for the Bonds was not economical, the Council desires to amend the Prior Ordinance to remove all references to the Bond Insurer, the Bond Insurance Policy, and the Insurance Paying Agent (as defined in the Prior Ordinance); and WHEREAS, Section 4.11 of the Charter provides that an ordinance may be passed as an emergency measure for the preservation of the public property, health, welfare, peace or safety, upon the unanimous vote of all members of the Council present or a vote of five members of the Council, whichever is less; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: Section 1. Amendment of Prior Ordinance. A. The Prior Ordinance is hereby amended such that all references to the Bond Insurer, the Bond Insurance Policy, and the Insurance Paying Agent are of no force and effect. B. Sections 32 and 33 of the Prior Ordinance are hereby deleted in their entirety. Section 2. Effect of Amendment. Except as specifically amended in this ordinance, all provisions of the Prior Ordinance remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance, the intent being that the same are severable. Section 4. Repealer. All orders; resolutions, bylaws, ordinances or regulations of the Town, or parts thereof, inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. Section 5. Declaration of Emergency. Due to the immediate need by the Town to issue the Bonds under current market conditions to effect a refunding of the Refunded Bonds (as defined in the Prior Ordinance), an emergency exists which requires the immediate passage of this ordinance as an emergency measure, and it is hereby declared that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of the public property, health, welfare, peace or safety. Section 6. Effective Date, Recording and Authentication. Pursuant to Section 4.11 of the Charter, this ordinance shall be finally passed on the date hereof and shall be effective on the date hereof. This ordinance, as adopted by the Council, shall be numbered and recorded by the Town Clerk of the Town in the official records of the Town. The adoption and publication shall be authenticated by the signatures of the Mayor and Town Clerk of the Town, and by the certificate of publication. This ordinance shall be published within ten days of the date hereof. 2 INTRODUCED AND. FINALLY PASSED AS AN EMERGENCE MEASURE AND ORDERED PUBLISHED in full in the Vail Daily, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Vail by a vote of to ,this 6th day of August, 2002 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Mayor Attest: Town Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF EAGLE ) SS TOWN OF VAIL ) I, the duly elected, qualified and acting Town Clerk of the Town of Vail, Colorado (the "Town") do hereby certify: 1. That the foregoing pages are a true, perfect and complete copy of an ordinance (the "Ordinance") adopted by the Town Council constituting the governing board of the Town of Vail (the "Council"), had and taken at an open, regular meeting of the Council held at the Town Hall, in Vail, Colorado, on August 6, 2002, convening at the hour of 7:00 p.m. as recorded in the regular book of official records of the proceedings of said Town of Vail kept in my office. 2. The Ordinance was duly moved and seconded and the Ordinance was passed and adopted as an emergency ordinance by a vote of to of the members of the Council at the regular meeting of the Council held at the Town Hall, in Vail, Colorado, on August 6, 2002, convening at the hour of 7:00 p.m., as follows: Those Voting Aye: Those Voting Nay: Those Absent: 4. The members of the Council were present at such meeting and voted on the passage of such Ordinance as set forth above. 5. There are no bylaws, rules or regulations of the Council which might prohibit the adoption of said Ordinance. 6. The Ordinance was published, after adoption, in full in the Vail Daily, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town, on August _, 2002, and the affidavit of publication is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 7. Notice of the meeting of August 6, 2002, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B was posted at the Town Hall, not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting in accordance with law. 4 WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Town affixed this August _, 2002. Town Clerk (SEAL) MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 2, 2002 SUBJECT: Ordinance 14: A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 to continue to allow the conversion of accommodation units into employee housing units located at the Vail Village Inn, 100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 15t Filing. Applicant: Daymer Corporation Planner:: -.. ,. -Russell Forrest DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Attached are Ordinance 14, Series of 2002, and a staff memo to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated June 10, 2002. If approved, Ordinance 14 would allow the continued use of the Vail Village Inn for Employee Housing (versus accommodation units) until May 2003 at which time the approval for both the EHUs and the most recently approved redevelopment plan (if a building permit is not pursued)for the hotel would expire. Building numbers 4 and 5 have been used over the last year for Type III employee housing units. A total of 56 EHUs have been used on the site in both buildings 4 and 5. The Fire Department has ordered that building 5 (over Craig's market) no longer be used for any type of occupancy due to significant life safety issues. With that order only 26 employee housing units would be available to the owner unless significant repairs are made to building 5. RECOMMENDATION BY THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) The PEC unanimously voted to approve a conditional use permit on June 10, 2002 with the following conditions: 1. That the conditional use permit to allow for Type III employee housing units shall expire on May 1, 2003. 2. That the applicant enters into a written agreement with the Town of Vail in a form approved by the Town Attorney stating that these units shall be used for employee housing until such date that the conditional use permit expires. 3. That only EHUs approved by the Vail Fire Department shall be used for occupancy. The PEC unanimously voted to recommend to the Town Council that they approve an amendment to SDD # 6 with the following conditions. 1. That only EHUs approved by the Vail Fire Department shall be used for occupancy. 2. That the approval of this major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 shall not supercede any previous approvals for this special development district. Since the PEC hearing on June 6th, Club Chelsea has submitted a building application to move into the bar area of the Vail Village Inn. This is allowed by zoning. However, it does utilize the available parking on the site. With that use staff would recommend that no more than 40 EHUs be converted and that the Vail Fire Department approve of each unit that is available for occupancy to ensure that units can safely be occupied as defined in applicable Fire and Building codes. _ i+r+.Trn~ w w -pe~ r~-~{~~~e~¢+ ~~n nr~~ni~-.t ^~ w v1~,1~ The Town Council will need to reference the criteriastated on page 8 of the PEC memo arid tlie~ findings on page 7. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 14, Series of 2002 2. Memo to Planning and Environmental Commission F:\cdev\COUNCIL\MEMOS\02\WI type 3 ehus0702.doc `., ORDINANCE NO. 14 SERIES OF 2002 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE APPROVED USES OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 6, VAIL VILLAGE INN, PHASE IV, TO ALLOW FOR THE CONVERSION OF ACCOMMODATION UNITS INTO TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, In 1976, the Vail Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1976, establishing Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn; and WHEREAS, Section 12-9A-10 of the Zoning Regulations permits major amendments to ., --..~. ___ _-- Y ---- -- _._ -_ _::__. -._. _ . _. _ . .. .. ~..,.._ .~. ._. . _ _.apnrr~>iari_~~~aq of ,~nar(al.flayalnnmanf I~IStrj~tc to Plirrajnata ~rc;n~t'?n'ln~iati{~n i_a~itS and tq _ . change uses; and WHEREAS, in 2001, the Town Council approved of Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2001 to allow a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 to convert accommodation units into Type III Employee Housing Units; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to amend the approved uses for Special Development District No. 6, to allow for the conversion of accommodation units into Type III Employee Housing Units; and WHEREAS, this major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 shall not supercede any previous approvals for Special Development District No. 6; and WHEREAS, the revised major amendment to the Special Development District is in the best interest of the town as it meets the Town's development objectives as identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Zoning Regulations, the Planning & Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the major amendment application on June 10, 2002; and Revised NwemMr I9, 2001 1 WHEREAS, the Planning & Environmental Commission has reviewed the prescribed criteria for a major amendment and has submitted its recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council; and WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code have been sent to the appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, due to extraordinary circumstances, the Vail Town Council considers it in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend the approved uses for Special Development District No. 6, Vail.Village Inn; and WHEREAS., the approval of the major amendment to Special Development District No.- - - 6, Vail Village Inn, and the development standards in regard thereto shall not establish precedence or entitlements elsewhere within the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village .Inn, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. The applicant, as required, has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Council that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided or has demonstrated that one or more of the development standards is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Purpose of the Ordinance The purpose of Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2002, is to amend the approved uses for Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phase IV. The approved development plans and Reviud November 19. 2001 ~ 2 uses for Phases I, II, III, & V remain approved and unchanged for the development of Special Development District No. 6 within the Town of Vail, unless they have otherwise expired. Only the uses for Phase IV are hereby amended and adopted. This. ordinance shall not supercede any previous approvals for the redevelopment of Phase IV of the Vail Village Inn and the owner may act on these previous approvals as approved in Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2001, at any time, until such approval expires. The purpose of Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2002, is to eliminate 74 accommodation units and to add up to 40 Type III Employee Housing Units until May 1, 2003. K .,. - Section 2. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled, Planning Commission Report The approval procedures described in Section 12-9A of the Vail Municipal .Code have been fulfilled, and the Vail Town Council has received the recommendation of the Planning & Environmental Commission of approval for a major amendment to the approved uses for Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. Requests for amendments to Special Development District No. 6 shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 12-9A of the Vail Municipal Code. Section 3. Special Development District No. 6 The Special Development District and the Major Amendment to the approved uses are established to assure comprehensive development and use of the area in a manner that would be harmonious with the general character of the Town, provide adequate open space and recreation amenities, and promote the goals, objectives and policies of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan. Special Development District No. 6 is regarded as being complementary to the Town of Vail by the Vail Town Council and the Planning & Environmental Commission, and has been established since there are significant aspects of the Special Development District that cannot be Revised November 19. 2001 3 satisfied through the imposition of the standard Public Accommodation zone district requirements. Section 4. Change in Use -Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phase IV The seventy-four (74) accommodation units located in the Vail Village Inn, Phase IV, shall be eliminated. No more than forty (40) Type III employee Housing Units shall be allowed. The Type III Employee Housing Units shall be allowed through a conditional use permit which shall expire on May 1, 2003, and after such date the use shall revert to the approved uses of Special Development District No. 6. The Vail Fire Department must determine that individual employee __ -- - . housing. units in Special Development District No. 6 comply with applicable adopted Fire aril Building Codes before occupation of an employee housing unit is granted. Section 5. Date of Expiration The conditional use permit and this major amendment shall expire on May 1, 2003, and the approved uses shall revert to those approved in Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, Phase IV. Section 6. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that . any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Revised Nm~em6er 19, 2W I 4 Section 7. The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. .. S^c*.:or ~ All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. The repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, heretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 2nd day of July, 2002, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 6th day of August, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Rwised November 79, 2 W I 5 READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 6th day of August, 2002. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: " Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk F:\cdev\ORD\02\Ordinance 14 - WI type III EHU's.doc Revised November 19, 2001 6 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and. Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 10, 2002 SUBJECT: A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 to continue to allow the conversion of accommodation units into employee housing units and a request for a conditional use permit, to allow for Type III employee housing units to be located at the Vail Village Inn, 100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1St Filing. :Applicant: Daymer Corporation " " '° ' ' ~ ~ " _. - Planner: Russell. Forrest ~" I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST Daymer Corporation, is requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, to allow for the conversion of accommodation units into employee housing units, and a conditional use permit to allow Type III employee housing units at the Vail Village Inn. This is a temporary request to allow the applicant to utilize the property for employee housing until construction can begin on the redevelopment of the property which was approved in 2000. The approval for development plans approved in 2000 becomes null and void on May 1, 2003. The property is zoned Special Development District No. 6, with an underlying zoning of Public Accommodation. According to Chapter 12-9A, a major amendment to a special development district is defined as: MAJOR AMENDMENT (PEC AND/OR COUNCIL REVIEVI~: Any proposal to change uses; increase gross residential floor area; change the number of dwelling or accommodation units; modify, enlarge or expand any approved special development district (other than "minor amendments" as defined in this Section), except as provided under Sections 12-15-4, "Interior Conversions'; or 12-15-5, "Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance)" of Phis Title. The elimination of accommodation units is considered a major amendment by this definition. In addition, Type III employee housing units are a conditional use in the Public Accommodation zone district. The applicant has requested a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 and, a conditional use permit for Type III employee housing units. The applicant is proposing no exterior modifications. Project History The following is a summary of the existing phases and development with the Vail Village Inn Special Development District: 1 Phase I -This phase consists of the buildings located at the southeast corner of the District. Phase I includes one residential dwelling unit approximately 3,927 square feet in size and nine commercial/retail spaces. Phase II -This phase consists of three residential dwelling units totaling approximately 3,492 square feet in size and three commercial/retail spaces. Phase II is generally located in the center of the District. Phase III -This Phase consists of twenty-nine residential dwelling units totaling approximately 44,830 square feet in size and six commercial/retail spaces. Phase III is located at the northeast corner of the District. Phase IV -This is the original and oldest Phase in the District. This Phase consists of one residential dwelling unit approximately 5,000 square feet in size and seventy-two accommodation units comprising approximately 16,585 square ... i~ci ur ~ IwVi u~ du. i i ~d.7 i. i v , iv ycJl. i .:i uny ~ivvc. i.~U ~i i L~ ii:: i ilii it I'r: ~::i L_ via i ivi, vi LI iG . ~ . Phase V -This Phase consists of eleven residential dwelling units and three accommodation units totaling approximately 9,972 square feet of floor area and four commercial/retail spaces. Phase V is located in the southwest corner of the District at the intersection of Vail Road and East Meadow Drive. When originally considering deviations from the underlying zoning in 1976, the Town Council found that such deviations were acceptable, as the community was to realize a substantial increase in the hotel bed base. An increase in short-term accommodations has been along-standing objective of our resort community. In 2000, a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6 was approved to allow for the redevelopment of the Vail Village Inn. The executive summary of this approval is attached for reference. On September 4th, 2001 a revised development plan was approved for SDD No. 6 (Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2001) which clearly stated that the approval for that development plan becomes null and void on May 1, 2003 if construction does not commence before that date. On December 4th, 2001 an amendment to SDD No. 6 was approved that allowed for the conversion of 56 accomadation units into Type III Employee Housing Units. In addition, a conditional use permit was approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission for the Type III Employee Housing units on November 12, 2001. That conditional use permit to allow for the 56 EHUs and the amendment to SDD 6, i.e Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2001, expired on June 1, 2002. II. REVIEWING BOARD ROLES A. Major Amendment to a Special Development District Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the PEC for impacts of use/development, then by the DRB for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning, and final approval by the Town Council. 2 Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The PEC is advisory to the Town Council. The PEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the Town Council on the following: • Permitted, accessory, and conditional uses • Recommendation on development standards including, lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverages, landscaping and parking • Evaluation of design criteria as follows (as applicable): A. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building .height, buffer zones, • - ~ ° • - ~ - ~ -• i{jPntity• rharar,.tPr-~ uici ial intanritu anr-# nriPntatinn_ • B. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. C. Parking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 10 of this Title. D. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and urban design plans. E. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. F. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. G. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. H. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Design Review Board: Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a SDD proposal, but must review any accompanying DRB application The DRB review of an SDD prior to Town Council approval is purely advisory in nature. 3 Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. ' Town Council: Action: The Town Council is responsible for final approval/denial of an SDD. The Town Council shall review the proposal for the following: IBC: 1'I I Illlliu,. GVVC:JJVI y, G11U vl~l IlAl ll l~~ ICwI UJG'J _ _ ~~ + r'~ppiovai of ueveiuNrieii't sidtiua~cis iitciudiny,.lat area, Side uirnersiurts, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking • Evaluation of design criteria as follows (as applicable): A. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. B. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. C. Parking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 10 of this Title. D. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and urban design plans. E. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. F. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. G. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. H. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. 4 I. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. B. Conditional Use Permit Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The PEC is responsible for final approval/denial of CUP. The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, ~- ~ ~ - - ~ ~ transportation facilities, .,utilities, schools, ~arks_ and recreation- ~~ - .... - .. facilities, .and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic,' with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. Conformance with development standards of zone district • Lot area • Setbacks • Building Height • Density • GRFA • Site coverage • Landscape area • Parking and loading • Mitigation of development impacts Design Review Board: Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a CUP, but must review any accompanying DRB application. The DRB is responsible for evaluating the DRB proposal for: 5 • Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings • Fitting buildings into landscape • Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography • Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation • Adequate provision for snow storage on-site • Acceptability of building materials and colors • Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms • Provision of landscape and drainage • Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures • Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances _ • I_nratinn and riacinn of catallitp r~lichac - . ~ _ .. • ....•• Provision ~f. nl~tdoor_liahtinc~ - ...'-- ~ - - _ - • The design of parks Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Since no interior or exterior physical changes are proposed as the result of this application, specific development plans, traffic analysis, and an EIR were not required by the Administrator. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION A. MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A site visit was conducted on the property on May 8th, 2002 with the property manager, Community Development, and the Fire Department. At that time significant life safety issues were found with building # 5 which can not be corrected without significant reconstruction of the building. Specifically, a large cavity in between the units in the building that has numerous fire wall penetrations into units was found. As the result of that site visit, the Fire Department is ordering that this building # 5 be vacated (See attachment B). However, building # 4 was found to only have minor maintenance issues which could easily be remedied to continue to allow occupancy. The Department of Community Development recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends approval of the applicant's request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council regarding a major amendment to Special Development District #6, to allow for the elimination of accommodation units and the addition of Type III employee housing units, subject to the following finding: 6 That the proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 72-9A-8 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. The applicant, as required, has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided or has demonstrated that one or more of the development standards is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent wifh the public interest has been achieved. Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to recommend approval of the requested major amendment, staff would recommend that the approval carry with it the following conditions: 1. That only building # 4 (26 units) be used for conversion to - ~ . • employee housing-units. - ~ • ~ ~ •~ - ~ • - 2. That the approval of this major •amendment to Special Development District No. 6 shall not supercede any previous approvals for this special development district. 3.. That the Fire Marshal completes an inspection of building 4 prior. to second reading of an ordinance amending SDD # 6 to ensure compliance with all applicable fire codes and safety provisions. Specifically annual maintenance is required with the fire suppression and alarm system. B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Community Development Department recommends approval of the applicant's request for a conditional use permit to allow for Type III employee housing units located at the Vail Village Inn, 100 E. Meadow Dr: /Lots M, N, and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1 Sc Filing, based on the following findings: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location, of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. If the Planning and Environmental Commission chooses to approve this request, staff recommends the following conditions be placed on the approval: 7 1. That the conditional use permit to allow for Type III employee housing units shall expire on May 1, 2003. 2. That the applicant enters into a written agreement with the Town of Vail in a form approved by the Town Attorney stating that these units shall be used for employee housing until such date that the conditional use permit expires. 3. That only the 26 units in building # 4 be used for employee housing. IV. ZONING /DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS Lot size: 3.45 acres or 150,282 sq. ft. (All Phases) y ... i:?~,:c.:c. o.: ~ ~ , ..--... ..~.:- ..~;.. ..:: 'acv:"' ~v. .aj G. ~. _. ..-'-- ---~+anrlor .. -. 7n .ire • ~ ~ _ Q.m~inrlmnn+ Llnncny~l ~ i r ~ nn .. - - Lot Area: 10,000 sq.ft min. GRFA: Dwelling units per acre: Employee Units Site coverage: Setbacks: 150,282 sq. ft. up to 150% or 225,423 sq. ft. 121% or 181,719 sq. ft. 25 du/acre (AU/FFU/EHU unlimited) unlimited 65% or 97,683 sq. ft. 13.0 du/acre 2 61% or 92,036 sq. ft. no change no change 12.75 du/acre 56/26 are habitable no change front: 20' 16' ~ no change sides: 20' S', 2', & 0' no change rear: 20' 5' no change Parking: per T.O.V. Code Section 291 parking spaces no change Commercial sq. footage: 10% of allowable GRFA 25% of GRFA or 45,228 sq. ft. no change or 22,542 sq. ft. V. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO SDD NO. 6 Title12, Chapter 9 of the Town Code provides for the establishment of Special Development Districts in the Town of Vail. According to Section 12-9A-1, the purpose of a Special Development District is: To encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land, in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development within the Town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Special Development District, in conjunction with the properties underlying zone district, 8 shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the Special Development District. The Town Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating the merits of the proposed Special Development District. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. The elimination of the existing accommodation units at the Vail Village Inn is considered a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6. As such, it is subject to the following review criteria: A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent, properties. relative ,to,.architectural design,: ~ , _ .. ___ _ ._ scale; bulk, building height, buffer zones; identity; character, ~ visual _., __, __ .__ ~ __~ _-~~ . -~, ' "integrity and orientation. ` - - _ ._._ _ . _ There are no exterior changes proposed with this major amendment to Special Development District No. 6. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The proposed use is to convert existing substandard accommodation units into Type III employee housing units. The underlying zoning of the property is Public Accommodation. Type III employee housing units are a conditional use in this zone district. The applicant is proposing to eliminate 76 accommodation units. 54 of these units will be converted to Type III employee housing units.. However, The use has been discussed in Section VI of this memorandum. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Title 12, Chapter 10, of the Town Code. Based on a site analysis, there are currently 82 parking spaces for this phase of the building. Chapter 12-10 of the Town Code requires 75.6 parking spaces for the employee housing units. In addition, Craig's Market requires 3.7 spaces. The total number of parking spaces required is 80 spaces. As proposed, the project meets the parking requirement. D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plan. Conformance with the Vail Land Use Plan and Vail Village Master Plan has been discussed in Section VI of this memorandum. Because there are no exterior modifications proposed with this application, the Urban Design Plan is not applicable. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. 9 According to the Town of Vail's Official Hazard Maps, there are no natural or geologic hazards present on the subject property. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The existing approved site plan for the special development district would not be altered with this request. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. There is no change proposed to the existing approved circulation system for Special Development District No. 6. ~ ~ o`u~~Cii~i3~nr+r ai1Ci ac:~~ s ~i, iaiiu~~a ~l°' .aii v°'~~r J wa.c ~1~ Vlu~;"1 ~J v til'ii'iZE and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. There is no change proposed to the existing landscape/open space plan for Special Development District No. 6. I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. This criterion is not applicable to this proposal. VI. REQUIRED CRITERIA AND FINDINGS -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A. CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. Vail Land Use Plan The Vail Land Use Plan identifies the subject property as part of the Vail Village Master Plan. However, the Vail Land Use Plan identifies goals and objectives which staff believes to be applicable to this proposal. Staff believes this proposal would impact the following goals and policies identified in the Vail Land Use Plan: 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). • Staff Response • Staff believes the proposed amendment would facilitate the location of employee housing units within the Town of .Vail (a high Council priority) at an existing infill 10 location. Staff believes affordable employee housing is essential for the provision of services that both residents and visitors expect. However, staff does not believe that this is an acceptable long-term use for this property. Staff believes that until the following goals of the Vail Land Use Plan outweigh the goals for the provision of employee housing at this location: 3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more efficiently. 3.2 The Village and Lionshead areas are the best location for hotels to serve the future needs of the destination skiers. 3.3 Hotels are important to the continued success of the Town of Vail, therefore conversion to condominiums should be discouraged. • ~ - ~ - ~ 3.4 ~ Commercial .growth should be.concentrafed in exisfinp commercial _ ... .._ •- :~:-:~ ._ _ .,, _ _ _ . areas to accommodate bofh local and visitor needs. _ • Staff Response Although the conversion of any accommodation unit within Vail's core areas should be highly discouraged, staff believes the subject property may be an appropriate location for employee housing for a temporary and defined time period. The applicant has an approval in place to redevelop the property. However, construction has been temporarily postponed due to a lawsuit which has subsequently been resolved allowing the developer to move forward with the approved plans. The conversion of these accommodation units to Type III employee housing units will allow the property owner to use the property, to the benefit of the owner and the Town, until construction can commence. 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail with appropriate restrictions. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with market place demands for a full range of housing types. 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. Staff Response Staff believes this proposal furthers the above-listed goals by providing additional opportunities for locals/employee housing within the town limits at an existing infill location. 6.1 Services should keep pace with increased growth. 11 Staff Response Staff believes the provision of employee housing is vital if Vail is to provide services consistent with the demand created by residents and visitors. Vail Village Master Plan The Vail Village Master Plan designates this property as "Medium/High Density Residential" and Mixed Use." According to the Vail Village Master Plan: Medium/High Density Residential: The overwhelming majority of the Village's lodge rooms and condominium units are located in this land use category.. It is a goal of this Plan to maintain these areas as predominantly lodging oriented with retail development limited to small - - .- ~ - - ---- - ~ •w'r7t:u.rly • ., - \.:u:..:c,.,ui,,. , ;;15,x-: ~ .. Mixed Use: This category includes the "hisforic" Village core and properties near the pedestrianized streets of the Village. Lodging, retail, and a limited amount of office use are found in this category. With nearly 270, 000 sq. ft. of retail space and approximately 320 residential units, the mixed use character of these areas is a major factor in the appeal of Vail Village. The Vail Village Master Plan identifies the following goals and objectives which staff believes are applicable to this proposal: Goal: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-around economic health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. Objective: Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations. Policy: The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term overnight rental. Objective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities as part of any redevelopment of lodging properties. Staff Response Because this request is temporary in nature, staff believes that this proposal is not contrary to the goals and objectives of the Vail Village Master Plan. These accommodation units are currently substandard units and the staff believes that the use of these as employee housing is acceptable. The approved redevelopment of the Vail Village Inn is consistent with the above goals and objectives. Objective: Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of the private sector. 12 Policy: Employee housing units maybe required as part of any new of redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning. Policy: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force. Policy: The Town of Vail may facilitate in the development of affordable housing by providing limited assistance. Staff Response Staff believes that the utilization of the existing accommodation units as Type III employee housing units, even as a temporary use, will further the above-listed objective to:encourage the developmenYof.affordable~_housing units. ~' ~ `~' ' 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. As this request is temporary in nature, staff does not believe that there will be a permanent effect on the above-listed items. However, the change in use from accommodation units to employee housing units will significantly change the character of the property. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Traffic Flow -According to ITE calculations, we should anticipate a 388% decrease in traffic generation based on the proposed uses based on the 2001 approval for employee housing units. With only 26 employee housing units instead of 56 units this impact will be even less. Additionally, staff anticipates a high percentage of pedestrian trips as opposed to vehicular trips. Staff believes this proposal would have a positive impact on traffic flow in the area. Parking -Based on a site analysis, there are currently 82 parking spaces for this phase of the building. Chapter 12-10 of the Town Code requires 75.6 parking spaces for the employee housing units. In addition, Craig's Market requires 3.7 spaces. The total number of parking spaces required is 80 spaces. As proposed, the project meets the parking requirement. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the bulk, mass or location of the existing building. -The adjacent uses include the existing Vail Village Inn Plaza, including commercial, lodging, and residential uses; 9 Vail Road, multiple-family residential dwellings; and the Vail Gateway, commercial and residential uses. Staff believes that given the mixed-use and residential character of the neighborhood, the proposed use of employee housing is acceptable. However, staff believes that this use should be limited to one year. 13 B. FINDINGS The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. . _ _ ._ .. V •.:i.i: ..iv V vv ... ...v ..-.....w-`.v.• ~:i:i.• r\.iJl: :J: ~ ~:Gt .v. CiINIL - - --- -- prcvi~icrs of tl;e-~cnditi~^wl-u~~ r~r^;it ~acti;,^ of the ~crry~ccu~. ~ . 14 Attachment 1 Map of Buildings Vail Village Inn ~, ~-~: ~~ },g T ~r Jrt ?~- s':( ~ ~ ~ ~- `j ~~r~~ ( ~ _- r . 9 Yom.. fM `~~ y ~~,~,~' - ti ~~ .~~ ~~ , ~, r _ ~ - ~ -- tt F' F~ ~ ~ ~ F t ~ t 6 ~ E 2 [ ~ t 3 _ i t ~ , ,,.• l'~ ~k' y'[1(i r ~.~ ~ r r `~ ~ fir., .~ o : ~-~ a~,~ ---. ~ s, ~ ~ ~~} ~ ~., ,. r ->- _, .. r b~. ' ' __ Jf 6~,. .i l :. 0.03 0 0.03 0.06 Miles N W E S 15 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council ~ FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: July 2, 2002 SUBJECT: A request to rezone the Lodge at Lionshead including Tracts I & J, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1St Filing from Agriculture Open Space (AOS) to Lionshead Mixed Use -1 (LMU-1) and a request to rezone 380 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1St Filing and 360 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2"d Filing from High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) and Medium Density Multiple Family (MDMF) to Lionshead Mixed Use -1 (LMU-1 ). Applicant: Lodge at Lionshead represented by Jeff Bailey . PlannPr~ ~ Ri_lSSPII Forr?~t :~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Attached is Ordinance 15, Series of 2002 and a staff memo to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated June 10, 2002. If approved, Ordinance 15 would rezone the Lodge at Lionshead to Lionshead Mixed Use 1. This area is in the Lionshead Mater Plan area. Based on a request from the property owners both the Lodge at Lionshead and Vail International were excluded from a multiple property rezoning that occurred in 1999. All other private properties in the Plan area were rezoned to LMU 1 or LMU 2. This was the first step in implementing the Lionshead Master Plan. The property owners of the Lodge at Lionshead are now requesting to be rezoned to Lionshead Mixed Use-1 Zoning. The applicant is not proposing any physical changes at this time. RECOMMENDATION BY THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) On June 10, 2002, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously recommended to the Town Council that they approve of this rezoning request. They further recommended that Lionshead View Corridor number 3 be further developed to provide guidance to any redevelopment of the Lodge at Lionshead. It should be noted that the Lionshead Master Plan specifically states that this view corridor be a "critical design parameters", but not be a benchmarked and surveyed corridor. Staff is recommending approval of this application and believes that since this is not a surveyed view corridor that it would be a consideration in any future redevelopment of the project. Therefore, it may not be appropriate given the language in the Lionshead Master Plan and that there are no defined plans for the Charter Bus lot to define this view corridor at this time. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR DECISION MAKING Staff would like to remind the Town Council that new criteria and findings were approved in 2002 for rezonings and text amendments. These criteria and findings should be referenced as outlined on page 6 of the PEC memo in any motion on this proposed ordinance. Attachments: 1. Language on View Corridor number three. 2. Ordinance 15, Series of 2002 3. Memo to Planning and Environmental Commission CHAPTER 4 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS -OVERALL STUDY AREA The mountain view from this point is currently very broad. crossing `. much of the Vail Associates core site. As part of the redevelopment of the Vail Associates core site this view corridor should become `~'y narrower and more focused on the new gondola terminal Given the current lack of a defining architectural edge, the dimensions of this corridor should roughly correspond to the suggested view boundaries outlined in figure 4-2. 4.4.2 Public View Corridors Where Redevelopment of the Viewpoint or the Foreground is Likely It is proposed that the following Three views be established as critical design parameters, but not as benchmarked and surveyed corridors. The extent to which ` an applicant for redevelopment creates or maintains these views will be a _ _ _ _ cons~deration~forapp~ovaTorarsappi•ovai tiy'iaie rev~iew~rrvvuarri.rnur~w - ~ ~ -~ - - ~~ approval of a.redevelopmenc application by the Town Council'the new-view . corridor should be surveyed and formally adopted in accordance with existing Town code. 4.4.2.1 View Corridor Three This view is from the east end of the Lionshead parking structure looking south across the Lodge at Lionshead buildings toward the ski mountain (see figure 4-3). This site has been identified for future development as a civic facility; when that happens, this view may become. more important. 4.4.2.2. View Corridor Four This view, seen from the southeast corner of the north day lot. looks south over the Vail Associates core site toward the ski slopes (see figure 4-4j. Iii designating this view, the intent is to ensure that future - - - - - development on the Vail Associates-core site retains~ari~"Tipper=ieve'i-~-~ - ~~~-~~~ ~~~~"~~`- visual connection to the mountain and the gondola lift line. Protection of this view corridor ensures that visitors will be able to see the Gore Creek corridor and the mountain when they arrive at the new transit center, much as one sees Pepi's Face from the bottom of Bridge Street. 4.4.2.3 View Corridor Five The intent of this view (see figure 4-5) is to provide both a visual and physical pedestrian connection through the Vail Associates core site to the ski yard. As seen from the main Lionshead plaza, this view will be framed by the architecture of the retail environment, not a panorama of the ski mountain. HEAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN PAGE 4-7 ORDINANCE NO 15. Series of 2002 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 5, ZONING MAP; REZONING TRACTS I & J, BLOCK 1, VAIL LIONSHEAD 1ST FILING FROM AGRICULTURE OPEN SPACE (AOS) TO LIONSHEAD MIXED USE -1 (LMU-1) AND REZONING LOT 7, BLOCK 1, VAIL LIONSHEAD 1ST FILING AND LOT 6, BLOCK 1, VAIL LIONSHEAD 2ND FILING FROM HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY (HDMF) AND MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY (MDMF) TO LIONSHEAD MIXED USE -1 (LMU-1 ). WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to implement the Lionshead Redevelopment --.__-- -- ____..-:Master Plan, ac~pntec~ by the Town nn December 15. 19913_ and . WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that these zone designations are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations, and are appropriate for the area; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of these zoning map amendments in accordance with the approved criteria for a rezoning as per Ordinance # 4, Series of 2002 at its June 10, 2002 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that this amendment is in accordance with the approved criteria for a rezoning as per Ordinance # 4, Series of 2002: WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend the official Town of Vail Zoning Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail is hereby amended as follows: That Tracts I & J, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 15t Filing be rezoned from Agriculture Open Space (AOS) to Lionshead Mixed Use -1 (LMU-1) and that Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 15~ Filing and Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing from High Density Ordinance No. 11 ,Series of 1998 Multiple Family (HDMF) and Medium Density Multiple Family (MDMF) to Lionshead Mixed Use -1 (LMU-1) in accordance with the attached map Exhibit A.. Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or • --- phragag h? r~a~lararl In~!al!d. ......._ ....:.....:..- - - -- ---: Section 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 5. ~ All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. Ordinance No. 11 ,Series of 1998 2 INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 2nd day of July, 2002 and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 6th Day of August, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. . Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ludwig Kurz, Mayor READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 6th day of August, 2002. Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ludwig Kurz, Mayor F:\cdev\ORD\0210rd 15,2002Lodgeatlionsheadrezone.doc Ordinance No. 11 ,Series of 1998 3 Attachment A _.. _ ... __ _. __ __ __ _ Lodge at Lionshead I K f-. 3 7 Pdd - .. 18 M' . 4 ~, EI"~ Y~ ry. AL~ 71~ ~ f ~ "t ~ St t it rd -:. ,..-~ i s ~ ~Y ( 7 ~ 2 S - ~' i-r i.r /V r. '~- - ar±~-~r.,yri T ,a- o ~^'.r'^"Y".C +.~„~;` i -7'~i !fir 'r ~7 s.,ea B r dM .. ~, ~~ A y ,~ ~ 1~ ~ ` x'!5. .Rai.' _ r ~k~ ~) n ~`k t ;try .. B Imnps ~. d~ Z` ~ 7F ~.. it ~t}* ~» 1 ~ Gore Creek. {~ r ~' zJr, D ~+ t EAST LTONSHEAD CIRCLE ~` ~ ~ "" tl ReL°°"' ' - ~ ~ ~~ ._ ~~ ~, ~_ ~5p1 FamlyF ~ntr9 ~ D ~r I I '-': ~ '~y ~~ a d Iola std Re`Id Ir~. J 450 RC ~ .~"~ ~~ ~ Low Gen stty M nl ple Famlly ~~I -,~~~' ~Metllu mDe slty MUltlple Famlly `. `.~ ®N Dn D ity M II pl• Feintiy ' }` I,i ~ f`~~.'sj ~L 0"+. WbI A o datio'n~ ' ~ a ~ ~ ~ pt i Dc ,It a EETOFS ~'. r< `b .~ a, ~ ®t 'alt z _ i ~ ~ O t cal C 3 .. . 6 ~' ~ _; ~ y~.~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~A~~~ ~~ i~ ~ n aa'r.>, a us is ~ ~,~t$„ r I< ~ ~ Head rv a u s z ~' 452 jF1 ~ _5~ ,Y~a ty .- oC tats wceCnnter; IV I [[ i CY .. ~ Y'~ - ~4 ~ ~i ~ #t rl I Bus ssr ~*~.y X i 5~ ~ Outtl Re al ~~r .`~ ~ i~,Y .. ; ~ {~ {' .~'~ ~~~~~ Daq It ral a o ~nsp.e. ;';7 } ~ f ~ ,~ y ~ Nat al Ar. e P s rVHliOrt ~~~1/ ~ ~ f ~„ ~r r ~ ~ 3J ~ f ~'~+ tf L r'~~~ J , *tr~ r ti~ .T~._ 3 ~ Sk B se Rew eatlon.. ~ ..,,"':"^ - ~'~. ~E Y. ,~~:, t~j~ w;l/ Ge r Luse ~ t .. ,. : L ;. ti-.,....'.~-~„~ ~ ,~~ ~~ ~n~ ~ ~.. ~ s~`~t ~~t,~-Y O Not De:~ar,atea ~,.. ~ f f r ~' { }fir ~ i F r,~~ r -'. ` .,-,.'" '~ 5.' '..~ Y Y? I fc9 'F ~~ ~. i ~ . ~,~ , j ,- 1 J Y - ~ t L (`IPLATTED ~ ~ ~~ S Ordinance No. 11 ,Series of 1998 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: June 10, 2002 SUBJECT: A request to rezone the Lodge at Lionshead includingTracts I & J, Block 1, Vail Lionshead ~1St~Filina from Agriculture Operi Space (AOS) o Lionshead Mixed 'Use -1 (LMU-1) and a request to rezone 380 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1$t Filing and 360 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2"d Filing from High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) and Medium Density Multiple Family (MDMF) to Lionshead Mixed Use-1 (LMU-1). Applicant: Lodge at Lionshead represented by Jeff Bailey Planner: Russell Forrest I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST This is a request to rezone the Lodge at Lionshead including Tracts I & J, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1St Filing from Agriculture Open Space (AOS) to Lionshead Mixed Use-1 (LMU- 1)and arequest to rezone 380 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1St Filing and 360 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2"d Filing from High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) and Medium Density Multiple Family (MDMF) to Lionshead Mixed Use -1 (LMU-1) (See attachment A). The Lodge at Lionshead is in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. However, based on a request from the property owners both the Lodge at Lionshead and Vail International were excluded from a multiple property rezoning that occurred in 1999 to begin the Lionshead Master Redevelopment Plan implementation. The property owners of the Lodge at Lionshead are now requesting to be rezoned to Lionshead Mixed Use-1 Zoning. The applicant is not proposing any physical changes at this time. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES The Lodge at Lionshead has three phases (I, II, & III). Phases I and II are zoned High Density Multi Family. Phase III consists of two zone district with 29 % of the property zoned High Density Multi-Family and the other 71 % zoned Medium Density Multi Family. The existing Phase III structure is predominantly in the High Density Multi-Family Zone District which is the north side of the Phase III site. The Lionshead Master Redevelopment Plan was adopted in December of 1998. The study area included the land between Middle Creek and Red Sandstone Creek south of I-70 (see exhibit below): In 1999, the Town initiated a rezoning proposal for the study area to Lionshead Mixed Use I and II. Two properties were eliminated from this rezoning at the owner's request. Those properties included the Lodge at Lionshead and Vail International. All other properties were rezoned to LMU -1 or LMU - 2 in the Lionshead Master Plan study area in 1999. The Land Use Plan designation for this area is Tourist Commercial. Lionshead Master Plan Study Area ~. ~ ,, ~- t ~. ~~~~. t~ - 1. ~ 1"~~2 ~} ,~ .:..~ }~!~.'~o ,~ ~ ~~ -~U ~ -~ .. ~~ ~ ~ ' ~, [ jW~. d~ ~ 1 ~V. ..a'1 ~ .!/ ~ ;,yam{~µl ._. , .. _ ... - I ~` ' ~ `-~y '~4 1: ~ I ~y~-_wz4;y ^~~j J ~, . ~ ~ ~11 V~/. ~ .C 'C~'-\ Y' .~ +C~S'.. Y ," il...-.--^~~+1h._ \ ~L l~l~ ~7} 1 ~ µ Y ~„'C ~t yW. ~~~ g "'^^^111 `Y' ""7 ,~ ~ "~ "4 ,~ ~ . ,~, - , .,~ ,_~ ~, ~,; i~,,.~ .Kr ~' ~WY~q L "u. -. L ~ ~ +a~ ~. ~ to "y'~#~L ~ ~ fY.v 4~ , t~ ~' ~ --t ~="'.` .+~'ti-:i~' .. u ~ ^' O Y W O~ P ~ti,/~.. r '~ 7 ti ..,. ~ ,~ Y°' ~~ ~ ~ >_ ~' I ~ ' . ! _. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REZONING ~~~_~ ~ 'i 'sa ~ ~` IONSHEA L:. r F .u i v r~ ®^ _~_~ The Department of Community Development recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of approval of the proposed rezoning to the Vail Town Council, based upon the criteria for evaluation listed in Section VI of this memorandum and the following findings: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Lionshead Master Redevelopment Plan, and compatible with the Town of Vail's development objectives. o~~~ ~{ ~~ * `Z W D ' .[{` d f w U _ ~'°.' . =~ 'd~ , J r ~ u ~~ 2. That the proposed rezoning is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the area. 2 3. That the proposed rezoning is in the best interest of the public health, welfare and safety. IV. ROLES OF THE REVIEWING BOARDS ZONING/REZONING Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The PEC is advisory to fhe Town Council. The PEC shall review the proposal and make a recommendation to the Town Council on the compatibility of the proposed zoning with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the community. _ Des~gn..Reyiew Board;. ~ ~ ~_ _ ~ " " ' ' Action: The DRB has NO review authority on zoning/rezonings. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided. The staff advises the applicant as to compliance with the Zoning Regulations. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: Action: The Town Council is responsible for final approval/denial of a zoning/rezoning. The Town Council shall review and approve the proposal based on the compatibility of the proposed zoning with surrounding uses, consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans, and impact on the general welfare of the community. V. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL The following tables summarize the development statistics for Phases I through III and Tracts I and J. Again, it should be noted that Phase III has both High Density Multi-Family (HDMF) and Medium Density Multi-Family (MDMF) Zoning on the property. Tracts I & J are both zoned Agriculture Open Space (AOS). 3 Zoning Analysis for Phases I- III Descri tion Current Zonin Lionshead Mixed U se 1 Zonin Phase 1811 Phase III Phase 18111 Phase III Zoning HDMF HDMF (29%) LMU1 (proposed) LMU 1 MDMF 71 % ro osed Lot Area 59,629 (1.3 12,399 (HDMF) 59,629 42,785 acres) 30,377 MDMF 42,785 Total GRFA Allowed 35,777 18,077+ 1,917 134,165 106,962 (250 credit on MDMF) Total = 19, 990 l7rCf H CXI,UII J/~~C~iF 1 ~ LV,U'4J J~%,04 I ~ Ll1,V'#J -~_ ~'~~'-~~~~~-~ Site'Coverage.~_~ -32;7yr5 .. _.._ --. ~0; i u9 ., --- 41;74x.. - -- -Zy;94y ._ :.._ . Allowed Site Coverage 16,796 11,626 16,796 11,626 Existin Height Allowed 48' sloping 38' sloping roof 71 (ave)/82.5' 71 (ave)/82.5' roof max max Hei ht Existin 51' 40' S1' 40' Setback 20' Front, 20' Front, Back 10' Front, Back & 10' Front, Back Allowed Back & Side & Side Side & Side Setbacks Front: 30' Front:51.2' Front: 30' Front:51.2' Existing Rear: 35' Rear:32.1' Rear: 35' Rear:32.1' Side 1: 6.3' Side 1:23.6' Side 1: 6.3' Side 1:23.6' Side 2: 3.5' Side 2: 6.3' Side 2: 3.5' Side 2: 6.3' Allowed Density 25/acre 25/acre (HDMF) 35/ac,re or 33% 35/acre or 33% 18/acre increase increase (MDMF) whichever is whichever is rester rester Existin Densit 31.5/acre 12.54/acre 31.5/acre 12.54/acre Dwellin Units 41 12 41 12 Required 82 24 82 24 Parking (2 per du assuming D.U. range from 500-2000 s . ft. Existin Parkin 45 18 45 18 Zoning Analysis for Tracts I and J Descri tion Current Zonin Lionshead Mixed U se 1 Zonin Tract I Tract J Tract I Tract J Zoning Agricultural Open Agricultural Open LMU-1 (proposed) LMU-1 S ace AOS S ace AOS ro osed Lot Area 5,326 sq. ft 5,158 sq. ft. 5,326 sq ft 5,158 sq. ft. GRFA One dwelling One dwelling 13,315 12,895 Allowed shall be allowed shall be allowed on a lot or parcel on a lot or parcel of less than 35 of less than 35 acres which acres which .. contains 1 acre of contains 1 .acre of .. . . . - ._ __u In flUYA tJ II. ~ i GIJ. ~ V1..1ch dVY ellll 113. ._.. vUl~u u6.11.: aA- -~-' ~C.1Ul,h dYY Cillll ll,^. `-_-_'. .' :.. -__ I _ `.. shall not exceed shall not exceed 2000 square feet 2000 square feet of GRFA of GRFA GRFA 0 0 0 0 Existin Site 266 257 3,728 3,610 Coverage Allowed Site 0 0 Coverage Existin Height 33' sloping roof 33' sloping roof 71 (ave)/82.5 71 (ave)/82.5 Allowed max max Height 0 0 0 0 Existin Setback 20' Front, 15' 20' Front, 10' Front, Back & 10' Front, Back Allowed Back & 15' Side 15' Back Side & Side 15' Side Setbacks N/A N/A Existin Allowed 1/35 acres or 1/35 acres or 35/acre or 33% 35/acre or 33% Density 1/acre of 1/acre of increase increase buildable area buildable area whichever is whichever is rester rester Existing 0 0 31..5/acre 12.54/acre Densit Dwelling 0 0 41 12 Units 5 Summary of Potential Floor Area Change Total existing GRFA today: 77,884 sq. ft. Total GRFA with LMU Zoning: 267,340 sq. ft Difference: 189,456 sq. ft. (over existing) VI. REZONING REQUEST; CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION The Town of Vail Zoning Regulations are intended to: "Promote the coordinated and harmonious development of fhe Town in a manner y ~f.-,r .nci ~ntt~l,~nmr»i i ~t Binh ni ,lifi~.n..,. ... ~., .., ... ." ~ . . _ _. -- --__ .- _.___ _. _ . -us~a reso ,, d :„ ,d.,.: ,.......ar..t,- of.h.y. .,.~a...,. -- In contrast to the master plans, which serves as a guide in land use decision making, the zoning and subdivision regulations are regulatory tools used to control development for the benefit of the public health, safety and welfare. The zoning regulations are specific with regards to development on property, including density, setbacks, height, etc. Where conflicts exist between the Land Use Plan and the zoning for a site, existing zoning controls development. However, in cases where a change in zoning is considered for a site, the land use designation and land use objectives as identified in the Land Use Plan are important considerations in the decision making process. REZONING CRITERIA Before acting on an application for a zone district boundary amendment, the Planning & Environmental Commission and Town Council shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested zone district boundary amendment: 1) The extent to which the zone district amendment is consistent with all the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town This property is located in the Lionshead Master Plan study area. Based on the purpose statement of the Lionshead Master Plan and the objectives of the Lionshead Master Plan this rezoning would achieve the municipal objectives. Specifically the objectives of the Lionshead Master Plan include: Policy Objective 2.3.1: "Lionshead can and should be renewed to become warmer, more vibrant environment for guests and residents. Lionshead needs and appealing and coherent identity, a sense of place, personality, 6 a purpose, and an improved aesthetic character." Taking advantage of the development rights proved by LMU will require the owners to also implement the design guidelines in the Lionshead Master Plan. Policy Objectives 2.3.3 "In order to enhance the vitality and viability of Vail, renewal and redevelopment in Lionshead must promote improve occupancy rates and the creation of additional bed base through new lodging products." Rezoning to LMU-1 will provide strong incentives for creating warm beds in that accommodation units, fractional fee units, and employee housing units do not count towards density. Policy Objective 2.3.6: "Financially creative fiscally y realistic strategies must be identified so that adequate capital may be raised from all possible • ~ sources to fund desired. private grid public improvements." This rezoning _ • wi~i provide ~eveniae~-opportunities to` erinance the overall~cnaracter of the property corsistent• with the deign guidelines of~tne~iviaster Nlari. 2) The extent to which the zone district amendment is suitable with the existing and potential land uses on the site and existing and potential surrounding land uses as set out in the Town's adopted planning documents Staff believes that the existing zoning designations is generally suitable with the existing land use on the site and adjacent uses. However, the rezoning requests will allow for redevelopment which is more suitable to the Town's objectives. In addition, zoning in the Town of Vail is parcel based. Phase III has two zone districts on one parcel. This proposal would create one zone district for the entire property. In addition, the property currently exceeds height, GRFA, setbacks, and density standards given the existing zoning. The proposed rezoning to LMU- 1 would reduce or eliminate the (legal) non-conformity on the property with the exception of parking and side setbacks: The rezoning is consistent with the Lionshead Master Plan and the Tourist Commercial designation in the Land Use Plan. The adjacent uses include Town of Vail lands such as the Library, Parking Structure, and Stream Tract. The only private adjacent use is Tree Tops Condominiums which is zoned Lionshead Mixed Use 1. Any future redevelopment would need to continue to promote and enhance the existing stream walk. The Plan would require step back from the streamwalk to help ensure a comfortable pedestrian experience. The Lionshead Master Plan also identifies a view corridor over Phase III of the Lodge at Lionshead that could impact height and limit the height of any future redevelopment on the east side of the building. 7 3) The extent to which the zone district amendment presents a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives This area is in the Lionshead Master Plan area and the Plan recommends that this area be rezoned to Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District. The plan contemplates how Gore Creek separates the multi-family and guest accommodation from the low density residential area on the south side of Gore Creek. The Library buffers this site from the Low Density Residential area to the east. 4) The extent to which the zone district amendment provides for the growth of an orderly viable community and does not constitute spot zoning as the amendment serves the best interests of the community as a whole; and ~~i accordance with ~t-IC~.~~.IllI~I~JI~%~IJ~III II IC i wvn Gf~'~afrZGlirl~'aii ~- ~I.IUU~~/LSIVI ii ~ ~~~~ Regulations and the Lionshead Master Plan, staff believes this rezoning provides for the growth of an orderly viable community. The proposed amendment would place the Lodge at Lionshead in one zone district versus three, which would simplify planning for potential future redevelopment. The density provided with. the Lionshead Mixed Use - 1 zoning would help facilitate redevelopment consistent with the design guidelines of the Master Plan and incentives the creation of accommodation units, lodge units, and/or fractional fee units. 5) The extent to which the zone district amendment results in adverse or beneficial impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water quality, air quality, noise, vegetation, riparian corridors, hillsides and other desirable natural features The riparian area along Gore Creek is on Town Land. This rezoning should have no significant impact on the natural environment. 6) The extent to which the zone district amendment is consistent with the purpose statement of the proposed zone district. The use of the site is consistent with the purpose statement of the Lionshead Mixed Use Zone District . This purpose statement is: "intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, time shares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. This District is meant to 8 encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan." 7) The extent to which the zone district amendment demonstrates how conditions have changed since the zoning designation of the subject property was adopted and is no longer appropriate. Since the property was placed in its current zoning, the property was incorporated into the Lionshead Mater Plan study area in 1998. The current zoning is not inappropriate for the existing use. However, LMU 1 zoning would decrease several of the non conforming development parameters on the site. 8) Such other factors and criteria as the Commission and/or Council deem applicable to the proposed rezoning. Necessary Findings: Before recommending and%or granting~~ari~approval of an application for a zone district boundary,amendment the Planning & Environmental Commission and the Town Council shall make the following findings with respect to the requested amendment: 1) That the amendment is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and 2) That the amendment is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas; and 3) That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its ' established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Attachment A Proximity Map & Current Zoning _ .. _.. _. _ _ _ _ . _.. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ Lodge at Lionshead Addr es-te;d w~I, ~,j. +r 4 'I ~ 5 y; .r~'.aj~'~ ~ ,~ blocks t zt.. .. a'~ ~'3c~a ~i;n"~~.nx jf a~ ry[ •fH.~ ,. ~~'r st e°,B ~ a~,. _ "G , ~~ ;"`~'~aFr;?tw f, s +E'i_ t.Jtir'" ~!4' ~s„bd ~5 m, __ ~, w..~. ~t .. ~ X ~~~. ~ 'i{. ":'~ rt' ~~` ~ ~"3 __ -. ~~+i4~,Nt# ~Go a Creek _ . . ~.,.--.^ -.~.__.._ r ~. _ _.. .. _ - __ ' ,Zone D rtri Ctz' E~:~T LIDNSHEAL vIRCLE o""'tl :R~'°°"`'' . :.. I" ~ s 81 Fnmuy Nas deotlal. r Fam~ry a e nt r. _ ~] Pn mwy sec ondery Res~dential~ i R d ntial CI ~ '. ~.1~ (~~ ~~ ~ L D nsity MUltl pl¢ Family. __ I Me0 m De stq MuNlple.Femlly~: l' ®H p~ D ity M It pIB;Family i y~y" ~~ Q P bl A 0 0 Eorr <} ~ m ,o~al ~ e3. 6 ~~ '32 ~ka~ r. ~LOnsn~,a na awgi` ~ ;. Ye ~~ ,~%.~~ Q l I dM d U e-2.~ a~~-fe-5 ~„~ }.ti Nj * ~ C cial 5 ce Center ~~JZ ~~~a Q~f'~ y Q~ r < ~ ~ ate al eusl ..h ~ rr i' ~ ®" vy Ser~c ... l _ s~, ~...:~ R 7 ,~ ' ~+~'~#.'~ 0 Outtl a Rec at . t ~tiT 1'~~Tf J t Rs3 J ., ur®. Apr c It al d OP SPaco. .. Y~~ ~~~ ~ ~s' ~ ~ +C1 ~~'"~ ~-.~ E ~ ®Nat I A ea P vation . "+'k~ ~- 5N ~ `r`Y 3 " ~r7 ~ Tom'} ~ ~ ~ [~ Sid B ~ Reareatton ..i _f...~~y~ n P rMr1B i t~~i~"rf ~ "W` _ j'y-~ i ~ Gerxral. Uae y u ~ Not Des~yriafed ~ N' ~. _ , it ~- v - - ;~ ~ _ ~ ;s 10 ORDINANCE NO. 16 Series of 2002 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN CODE, TITLE 12, CHAPTER 22, SECTION 4, ADOPTION OF VIEW CORRIDORS, BY ADDING TWO VIEW.CORRIDORS IN LIONSHEAD AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the proposed view corridors protect and perpetuate views from public,pedestrian areas, public ways, or public spaces within the Town which foster civic pride and are in .the public interest for the Towri; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the proposed view corridors protect and enhance the Town's attraction to residents, guests, and property owners; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the proposed view corridors protect views which are commonly recognized and have inherent qualities which make them more valuable to the Town than other more common views; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the proposed view corridors are consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, and Title 12, Zoning, of the Town Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of the proposed view corridors at its July 8, 2002, meeting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend said Chapter and Sections of the Town Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Title 12, Chapter 22, Section 4, Adoption of View Corridors, is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2002 1 A. View Point #1: A view from the west end of the Lionshead parking structure, standing at street level at the front of the entrance to the Subway restaurant (395 E. Lionshead Circle) and looking southwest toward the gondola lift line. 1. Purpose: To protect the views of Vail Mountain from the Lionshead area. 2. Survey control: Based on published material from town of Vail GPS control map. Points Spraddle and 1766 were used for this survey. Bearings reported below are tied to this control. 3. Instrument at View Point #1: A 2 inch diameter brass monument, flush in brick pavers, stamped View 1. 4. Backsight: A 2 inch diameter aluminum Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, Inc., monument which bears S11 °47'42"W 327.94 feet distant. Located at the north edge of a concrete ring for a water manhole approximately 15 feet north of the north edge of the bike path. 5. Height of Survey Instrument above View Point #1:5.26 feet. 6. Table: Bearin Zenith Angle Foresight Point On Photo As Of June 12, 2001 S05°14'25"W 79°09'13" A -intersection of the horizon with a vertical line defined by the southwest corner roofline on the Treetops Condominium building, 452, E. Lionshead Circle. S05°22'18"W 80°11'31 " B -intersection of the roof overhang at the west end of the Treetops Condominium building.and the southwest corner of said building, 452, E. Lionshead Circle. S05°38'24"W 80° 17'55" B1 -westerly upper corner of the roof overhang at the west end of the Treetops Condominium building, 452, E. Lionshead Circle. Bearing Zenith Angle Foresight Point On Photo As Of June 12, 2001 S05°48'38"W 81°42'54" 62 -westerly lower corner of the roof overhang at the west end of the Treetops Condominium building, 452, E. Lionshead Circle. S05°22'28"W 81°43'15" 63 -intersection of the roof overhang at the west Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2002 2 end of the Treetops Condominium building and the southwest corner of said building, 452, E. Lionshead Circle. S05°22'28"W 90°01'11" B4-a point on the westerly edge of the Treetops Condominium building, 452, E. Lionshead Circle and running horizontal with and perpendicular to the southeast corner roofline of the bus stop building at Lionshead Circle. S24°16'45"W 90°01'11" C-southeast corner roofline of the bus stop building at Lionshead Circle. Said point being the lower limit of View Point #1, intersecting with the vertical line described below for point D and running horizontal with and perpendicular to the westerly edge of the Treetops Condominium building, .452, E. Lionshead Circle. S23°11'03"W 85°40'57" D -intersection of the horizon with a vertical line defined by the southeast corner roofline on the Vail Lionshead Centre Condominiums, 520, Lionshead Circle. S23°11'03"W 79°09'13" E -point of intersection of the southwest roofline of said Treetops Condominiums building defined by Point A and the southeast corner of said Vail Lionshead Condominium buildirg as defined by Point D. B. View Point #2: A view from the pedestrian plaza at the east end of the Lifthouse Lodge (555 E.Liorishead Circle) looking south directly up the gondola lift line. 1. Purpose: To protect the views of Vail Mountain from the core of the Lionshead area: 2. Survey control: Based on .published material from town of Vail GPS control map. Points Spraddle and 1766 were used for this survey. Bearings reported below are tied to this control. 3. Instrument; View Point #1: A 2 inch diameter brass monument, flush in brick pavers, stamped View 2. 4. Backsight: A 2 inch diameter aluminum Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, Inc., monument which bears S02°47'02"W 299.06 feet. Located 75 feet north from the Vista Bahn, 15 feet south of a 3 foot by 4 foot steel drain and 2 inches south of the of the bike path. 5. Height of Survey Instrument above View Point #2: 5.20 feet. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2002 3 6. Table: Bearing Zenith Angle Foresight Point On Photo As Of June 12, 2001 S07°18'22"E 79°09'49" A -intersection of the horizon with a vertical line defined by the southerly roofline on the Vail Lionshead Centre Condominiums, 520, E. Lionshead Circle. S07°26'34"E 85°16'50" B -intersection of a lower roof at the westerly end of the Vail Lionshead Centre Condominiums and the westerly building wall of said building, 520, E. Lionshead Circle. S06°16'57"E 85°41'00" C -westerly end of the lower roof on the westerly end of the Vail Lionshead Centre Condominiums, 520, E. Lionshead Circle. S05°11'59"E 88°30'52" D -intersection of the westerly lower wall of the Vail Lionshead Centre Condominiums and a wood deck at said building, 520, E. Lionshead Circle. S07°07'02"W 88°30'52" E -point of intersection of said wood deck and said lower wall of said Vail Lionshead Centre Condominium building defined by Point D and the westerly side of Bwana Run on Vail Mountain running under the lift towers for the Born Free Express Lift and the Eagle Bahn Express Gondola. S07°07'02"W 79°09'49" F -point of intersection of the southerly roofline of said Vail Lionshead Centre Condominiums defined by Point A and the westerly side of Bwana Run on Vail Mountain running under the lift towers for the- Born Free Express Lift and the Eagle Bahn Express Gondola. Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2002 4 Section 4. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Town Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 16th day of July, 2002, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 6th day of August, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Attest: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 6th day of August, 2002. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2002 5 ry. y. ~-~ r kr~ Ff/'TF` 3~~'L r'71'=tY {F~~ x ~~~ 1 ~',Z,S~~~ ~ ~ j - . ~ r v ~'1'F `', '~' ~L~ -a 71 "R, ~~~ ~} ~ ~ ~ ~ d .%~~ ~:.~y ~ ~ r~:.,T` ~ { -r~~ ~xi,- .t3 Y"'3k ~~"'.t, s. 1 Y 5'?U y Y ,.. .. ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~~Ya,~~~."~ + ~ 'trk~ ~ ~ 4" ~ , ~Ar '~~ ~ art ,~ k ~ i a ~'a.. j ii,. - 7~ ~~r3Z ~a,ii,: "" ';~+u+~~ ~ _ ~,,~, # ~~~iift ~~ry6~~'4y btu 1 '~'~t `'S: ~:~ ~s~_rLa..., M ~ ai i~ "i - ~` t '~_~ "~4 't?.. YK.. r7'F~ ' ~~ ;"X r ~.ro iiirr Ir' }'... 1 ~ l~ F ~. ~i. tC-~5. t ., 't :~: r°ra~ta! y~r. '~ ~~ i ~ k~~t`a,L .~ _` .._ ~ ~ . 4H;1Tf 4~~ .. „_, . r ~t ' ~ Y r~ .yt.t, • ~ ~ ~ t r ~ ,{ s 7C i k ~~ /' ~A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:: ~ ~ V' } ` t.~ ~.`~` : ~zr tr ~ ~ - ti D ~~ ~~ 1~ r r _rY- ~j:a 2r K S(~ 7F~. ~ ~yL o~'~~~~ ~ ,) - '~ F '. ~ ;~X ' t i t :7i;z1 ~'4~Fz' ~ i d a ,( ~.~ ~ S xd 'ti I ~"7 ~ ~ ~, rt 1"~ ~ r ,. ti ~ _ a . ~~~; ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ '1~ # ~ ~ ~ }f }~ _ ,{ rte G` T ~ ~,~"}?' ~,~ t rcw„~t '~ - `T !!{{~~ =~ l: '4. J" ~ _ ~i 3.K , ,+ I'tj ~ ~S.~~R S" ~,r • ~rt l!~rye~i, ~~`~'4Y~ , {~ T:~3 `~ * '# : ~ ~Yif. VI, y/y. J-: ~ r~~ ,w. L ~ ~j i,. .y h~'J,.," J I~. ~ik~°A sf,... ~1 y'Cgf' ~ ~ r,V'' k ~ l~ ~ b .~' ,~~1~'i~ .r.` ' ' ~ .. t ~. ' ~ y ~'., ~ ~.^ t 1~"" ~ Z.c,~ ~ 4tt ", ~,,,7 4,,,.y`~.xt~t`~4 ~ , ~ '~ .,,;1 ~9~'k~i~k_ ' ~ ~ , ` / h} ~q^ ~ ~ ~ sir ~~~ ~'~~t+aa ~}' _, ~ ~ ~ s:,r ' r~4 ~ - ,k ~,~ .( .^ifr~ 'r ~"" ~ ~? ,~~ •i ., . '-~ _ - -.~~ ~ .-- a ... .- _.. - - . ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - - _ i c ~ ~~ . r ~ r ~ i, ` - _ ~~ .~ ~ ; ~ VIEW C[~RRILIOR NO ~.: ~._ ~ - t , p ~+z Y C ~ `~~ ~~ m ~~~~ .1 ~: ` 'T n .L rrv'R~y~ ~'~' `. .~ a..x+. w ~y fir{/~6(.. 4,,~# . ~' ~ ~ ~~ T s~~f ~' _ - ' ~~ ~~ ~~ t3 i : ~ ~ ~ i- ~ +~~ ~ .~"`~ t ~~, z ,,;~r ..ti a / ~ t ~ ~~ ,r~ 4 r t ~• '~ ~ . ~`( k R ~~.~.1. r j'~~.,.+ ~'-~:4, r ~ ~•• ~ 1, - `_-..- ~~~ - ~^ a~rros. ~.f, :+st 1. ~.. 'k ~ + i t- _o.r F'" r7 ~ iA24:;~. ~y `. ~r ~q _ J~f+~4.. ,4• ~+~. t "` f~ +f ra r ^~1 ~t : iry 1~~~'t.,.r'+ ~ '~ f.~'~~'~~g"~ ~ - i~' 't,r , ~,. Y~,. ~ at frr•Teri ~' ~t~~~l ~ +yr k'+~ ci_z v.'Kj - - ~t9 _ 9.-~~.•,~,~.~ `!'rr.~~~~~~.~s'"4~~~~G~*3yx + "'} ..~< <~! r r ~,~ to ~'('+r~ ~ ~` '`:~~ - ~ ~~ ~ 5 ~~ ~ r ~~y s.- ti. ,:~; 1, ~r :~~" )~ ;~~ ~~,~.. J ~ 4 ~~ r~Y ~- fa ~ Y~ + -~ c]"i~~t~ . tt 'c; 1~' vy. ~. (~~L~~~.'~'.~-~-oa ; i~` lr s,~ ~`~ l,- cr t ~t ,,~4,1 . < -,- ~ ~}' "~ ~ ~:... x .~y, ,~tir.. jt.,y.~ ,y '~.~ ' ~ ,fit ~. _ i ~ )e5~-t~ r~ IC ~,~. ~.y ~,~ 'Fe . 1~(' _y ` y~A Y c1 ti,` ' Js~ r Y'Sf+~l« ~t a A k'`.s ff ~ ~ -f''7~ Tyr c" ~~~ ,r ~ ~"'K~r"~iF~at,~ ~oJ L~iyy,~~y ~ '. '~'lr._ t j ~ ~~5,> 4,xa .F,t 4 ~ ? tF- k:1~"~. .Y .r ~. ..b .`S~•F ~ ~Y• ..ccF~ LEI ~ y} - ~f :.,f "'~ + > Y , '~ • i. ~~ ~,:: s _ Y ` r ~," ~ `, f'~ ai .. 7. t ~ ~! ~ ~~~~5 ~~~ ~~ ~ ~..k K A..k ` ~i~~l ~~Y fit .~1~~y4 ~ y~.~ :f~, - h ~tit~~k 1 ~It { ,»~~ '~~ ~ `~~ r:. , .. s ~.. :~: ~f, ,4- ~.k r +..: d~ ~ ;y~ , ~ ~ ` 11, } °' +~ . '+ r`. M s~ r n, ~ 1 r ~ 7 i v,, ~ 1 1 r°v-~!t.C>~~ l~ ~-~' ~ R ~.. ~ ~ ° "!-i. '~k+.°`,~ 4'~,^ ~~'j '3h'i~y` ~. ~ ~ r~yy' ' ~ ~ ~- ~ ~. r r f ~ ~. , ~., a ,x[~ 7~ - ,~ ~, .~+f':~~ ~' + yra~ ~{.;_ ~ti_>I~ > ~'.~ ~4 ... r ~ P:, J .:;9~T ~. r r>+ ~ ~tifi~; d i.. ,.~ ?'`A,~~, t~ R' C~.: ryf a{ sx( ~'ii. ~ wT~~ C .xfyi'+. p. .J/ .r lr :' i .~_ ~ ~>~ ~ r'Y~ St '.t ~,i-M}~°~_ ~iwc..,ar}..~ y t"k`~r ~Ki,-ql, t ~~s~l ~ .,+iil'+,1 J xjy~'A~ i".fji-Y~ ~~. ,1 :.. :-'~ ~~ -: ~ Y t k~dh i S` jy"tF...~ 1~~~ :.~~, - _ _ fti.~. kri f~ ~T r~1 ~.,'7+v.w~~.--;~~ `A~" }..~ ~ -,.v+~~r^~ ~fi '"-~r F~~~g.r~~r'J_ r;.~r-v. ~t~.a4 '.~ +,r ^y - s., f x;~y ~ Y.. '~~1 '~~`_..i,~ yy ~ F~' .~ :~4+Y,. - i-c4~ ry,,.4`~. ky~ l .W~%' 4~ ~, ;-f A 'w ~' I~a fi Lr t~41 ~ k.p ~'', $~' '!'~ .~ ~~, ~~~ - ~~ut ~ ..'Y SY.. ~y ~~`~,._ xi. ... :a J : '..~R ji }a~F ~~ f;' ~r ~. t ~i t t } hs~sv ~ e ~ ~.. 11 ., ~~.,U 1 ~~ µ`~Y;.: r~yy,~~ ~ ~,~1 7L 1:.. ['+ ~~ •~ /'i 7~,-~J1y~,e ~' .~ ~ ~,) 1j,` rt:~.- ~ i .y. :~.,-7.^ .. - :, t A ~ ~ t T 1 t ~`d t .fir ~ , :J~~l y ~ ~ ti" .ryrrLy r ,q - - - ~ ~`.'~r-y,~.L~,4+t ~',t~, r'~ v tll` ~ 'f+- ~7~~<'~M { +~e~5~.-t'4f: nhi[ a ey .i - , ;~ ~~ - `;'f q'. ~'Jwyl ~ -_ ;• - _ ;>y;e!'cc~.~ti.,u"J...r2ra+.,~- - nr• ter: ~'-' _ ~ ~.. 1 - ~ .. - _ 1. ` _ ,. t ~. t _ - , MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager RE: Town Manager's Report DATE: August 6, 2002 CAST MEETING The Colorado Association of Ski Towns will be meeting on Friday, August 23rd, in Aspen. On Thursday evening, the 22"d ,there will be a CAST dinner, with the meeting being held the following morning. If you are interested in attending this meeting, please let me know. If you would like to attend the CAST dinner on Thursday night, please let me know and I will make arrangements for a room and a reservation for dinner. MIDDLE CREEK HOUSING UPDATE In an effort to keep this project moving forward, it will be necessary to relocate the ABC and Learning Tree schools to a temporary location while their new facility is being constructed. After examining a number of sites for this temporary use, we are proposing that the charter bus lot be used for this location. We have applied for the necessary permits to locate this facility there. The conditional use permit required to operate the temporary facility in the proposed location is scheduled for review by the Planning and Environmental Commission on August 26th. In the course of this review, the Council will have an opportunity to review it. If you would like to see a copy of the site plan prior to the development review, please let me know and I will make it available to you. SPECIAL EVENTS BANNER POLES IN THE VILLAGE Because access to local groups wishing to hang special events banners was initially denied prior to the Fourth, staff is requesting direction from Council to install banner poles at the corner of Bridge and Gore. When not displaying special events banners, the poles will hang flags. Both placements will occur on public right-of-way, but will be integrated into the Village Streetscape re-design. TOWN OF VAIL BENCH DEDICATION PROGRAM Attached to this report is an application for the TOV Bench Dedication Program. Rod has suggested adding the following wording to line 10..."and so on. The location of the bench will be strictly at the discretion of the Town of Vail." Staff is requesting even clearer direction on where the benches may be placed, e.g., not in front of restaurants unless written permission has been received from owner, in order to better respond to requests for purchase of these benches. All bench placements will continue to occur on public right-of-way. VAIL LOCAL MARKETING DISTRICT (VLMD) MARKETING CONTRACT. The sitting chair of the VLMDAC (Beth Slifer terminated the contract with Barnhart and Associates on Friday,. July 26t . This advisement is for information only. UPCOMING ITEMS: August 20, 2002, Work Session Vail Recreation District Quarterly Meeting Streetscape-East & West Meadow Dr./art components & discussion Site Visit: Memorial Park/Cemetery Discussion of Vail Mountain School Ordinance August 20, 2002, Evening Meeting Resolution approving ballot content for Nov. '02 election. Discussion of memorial park (east end of Katsos, Spraddle Creek trailhead); streamwalk between the Mountain Haus & Ford Park. East/West meadow Drive Streetscape Discussion 1St reading, Ord. #_, Vail Mountain School 2"d reading, Ord. #19, Bear Ordinance TOWN OF VAIL BENCH DEDICATION PROGRAM Recognize a special person, an achievement or an occasion by dedicating a bench within the Town of Vail. Individuals, families, organizations, or businesses may enroll for a standard town bench, with an engraved brass plaque on the front. The cost of the 10-year term for each bench is $2,000, which includes the bench, engraving, and annual maintenance. All bench text, and font styles are subject to review and approval by the Town of Vail as determined by the Office of the Town Manager. Bench plaques shall not be used for commercial or promotional purposes. Suggested appropriate text would be: Dedicated to "...", , In memory of "...", In recognition of "...", In honor of "...", With IJ oving memory_of "... ", S onsored b "... ", Brou ht to ou b p y g y y ... ,and so on. ~To reserve a bench, please complete the section below and return along with your check or credit card information to: Town of Vail Attn: Pam Brandmeyer ~, 75 South Frontage Road Vall, CO 81657 ~ For bench locations or additional information, please contact Pam Brandmeyer at the Town of Vail, (970)479-2113, or pbrandmeyer@ci.vail.co.us. ~, ~_ NAME ADDDRESS CITY/STATE/ZI P TELEPHONE PAYMENT METHOD: CREDIT CARD TO BE USED (circle one) CREDIT CARD NUMBER MASTERCARD/VISA/DISCOVERY EXP.DATE CARDHOLDER SIGNATURE ENGRAVED MESSAGE REQUESTED (approximate size: 6"x2") f:mcaster/bsalter/format/bench dedication program MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 22, 2002 SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for time share units on the first floor of a building or above per Section 12-7H-3C, located at the Antlers Condominiums, located at 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead 3~d Filing. . Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Rob Levine ' ~ Mariner: ~ ` ueorge Ruther~VVarren iampiJeii I. SUMMARY The Antlers Condominiums are located in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District. The Antlers Condominium Association is requesting a conditional use permit to allow time share units on the first floor and above per Section 12-7H-3C of the Vail Town Code. Staff is recommending approval of the request as it furthers the goals of the Town's development objectives, has no measurable negative affect on traffic flow, parking, Town services, or on the public health and safety as outlined in Section VIII of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE RE(~UEST The Antlers Condominium Association is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for six time-share units on the first floor or above levels of the building (units 318, 321, 417, 418, 420, and 520). The Antlers Condominiums are located at 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead 3~d Filing. This request is the result of the desire to market six of the new units constructed as quarter share time-share units. Purchasers would be entitled to 13 weeks of usage and would be encouraged to make their condominium available for short-term rental during periods of non-usage. Short-term rental of the units would be managed through the Association's existing reservations program. The Antler's Condominium Association has recently completed the Antler's 2000 redevelopment project. The redevelopment project undertaken by the association included, among other things, the construction of 22 new residential condominium units. The 22 new condominiums units are in addition to the 70 units previously existing on the property. The association is currently in the process of selling the new condominiums. To date, 16 of the new condominiums have been sold and six of the new condominiums remain available for purchase. The association has recently inquired and received a determination from the Town of Vail Community Development Department ,about their ability to sell each of the remaining condominium units in ~/4 divided shares. The Association with this request is asking to sell the remaining six condominiums units to up to four owners each. Of the six units two are located on the first floor, three on the second, and one on the third floor. The total GRFA of the six units is 8,166 square feet. III. BACKGROUND On June 24, 2002 the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed and. approved a request by the Antlers Condominium Association to permit the sale of quarter share time shares. On June 14, 1999 the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed and approved a major exterior alteration and the addition of several condo units and EHUs. IV. ROLES OF THE REVIEWING BOARDS Planning and Environmental Commission: The Planning and Environmental ,.. ~ ,,.• .. yF,:.. .,,.fir.;,, .,~ . .,~,;± .,.,.,(;,,.,+:..,, { , 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. `Effect of the use on light and .air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow arid control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors .and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of the Vail Town Code. 7. Conformance with development standards of zone district: Design Review Board: The Design Review Board is responsible for evaluating the Design Review application for: 1. Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings. 2. Fitting buildings into landscape. 3. Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography. 4. Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation. 5. Adequate provision for snow storage on-site. 6. Acceptability of building materials and colors. 7. Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms. 8. Provision of landscape and drainage. 9. Provision of fencing, walls; and accessory structures. 10. Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances. 11. Location and design of satellite dishes. 12. Provision of outdoor lighting. 13. The design of parks. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS 2 'The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Vail Town Code. The Antlers Condominium Association is requesting a conditional use permit under the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District Section 12-7H-3C of the Vail Town Code. Therefore, this proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Title 12, Chapter 16, Vail Town Code. For the Planning and Environmental Commission's reference, Section 12-16-1, of the Vail Town Code, identifies the purpose for a conditional use permit as follows: In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they maybe located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. .Uses. listed as .conditional. uses in ._ .-__~ 'time vario_ us'districts~may~be~permitfed subject to~such"conditions and limitations __ as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions . cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied. This request is also governed by the provisions of Article H, Section 12-7H-1, Lionshead Mixed Use. 1 Zone District. The request for a conditional use permit to allow for time- shares on the first floor and above deals specifically with Section 12-7H-3C which provides for "Lodges and accommodation units" on the first floor as a conditional use. ARTICLE H. LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 1 (LMU-1) DISTRICT 12-7H-1: PURPOSE: The Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of ,~ multiple-family dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, time shares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. This District is meant to encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. This Zone District was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop. The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create an economically vibrant lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The incentives in this Zone District include increases in allowable gross residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the incentives is to create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help finance public off-site improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. With any developmendredevelopment proposal taking 3 advantage of the incentives created herein, the following amenities will be evaluated: streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements. (Ord. 3(1999) § 1) 12-7H-2: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; BASEMENT OR GARDEN LEVEL: A. Definition: The "basement" or "garden level" shall be defined' as that floor of a building that is entirely or substantially below grade. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure: Banks and financial institutions. Commercial ski storage. Eating and drinking establishments. ~~-.- ~~-.' I C~fJV%-IUi-Jv1~Y 14.. 4.r/. - ~~.. ~_ _~ _, .__ _ _, _., _ __ _ .._ _ _.._____. ___ _,___. _ °r„ ~sJ,orul cff,IV,:J, .,u::%ncJJ offi„es and st,..,;c.;. - - Public or private lockers and storage. "Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Major arcade. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, time-share units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type 111 (EHU) as provided in Chapter 13 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. (Ord. 6(2000) § 2: Ord. 3(1999) § 1) 12-7H-3: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building that is located at grade or street level along a pedestrianway. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level within a structure: Banks, with walk-up teller facilities. Eating and drinking establishmer;t~. Recreation facilities. 4 Retail stores and establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level floor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Barbershops, beauty shops and beauty parlors. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Financial institutions, other than banks. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, time-share units, fractional fee . , , .clubs, lod__ge dwellingq .units, and employee,housing~ units: (Type. 111 (EHU) as . . provided -n Chapter 73; of this rifle). Radio, TV stores, -and repair shops. - `Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. (Ord. 6(2000) § 2: Ord. 3(1999) § 1) 12-7H-4: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; SECOND FLOOR AND ABOVE: A. Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on those floors above the first floor within a structure: Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, time-share units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type 111 (EHU) as provided in Chapter 13 of this Title). Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on second floors and higher above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Banks and financial institutions. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Eating and drinking establishments. Liquor stores. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Theaters. Time-share units and fractional fee clubs. .Additional uses determined to be similar to co~~ditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. (Ord. 6(2000) § 2: Ord. 3(1999) § 1) 12-7H-5: CONDITIONAL USES; GENERALLY (ON ALL LEVELS OF A BUILDING OR OUTSIDE OFA BUILDING): The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Bed and breakfast as further regulated by Section 12-14-18 of this Title. Brew pubs. Coin-operated laundries. Commercial storage. Private outdoor recreation facilities, as a primary use. Public buildings, grounds, and facilities. Public or private parking lots. Public park and recreation facilities. Public utility and public service uses. v ... _. ....~ v :.^- ~.-- _. ~ .. _:.- ._ Tel ~~isio^ /tsti^r~ -- - .. -. -__' ,_ _ ~ _ _, ~. _ .__ Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described i. subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 3(1999) § 1) ~ this (Ord. 12-7H-6: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Title. Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to permitted and conditional uses. Minor arcade. Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses. Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and drinking establishments. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential or lodge uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof.. (Ord. 3(1999) § 1) The Vail Town Code defines several words which aid in the interpretation of the request. Several definitions of importance to this request are: FRACTIONAL FEE: A tenancy in common interest in improved real property, including condominiums, created or held by person, partnerships, corporations, or joint ventures or similar entities, wherein the tenants in common have formerly arranged by oral or written agreement or understanding, either recorded or unrecorded, allowing for the use and occupancy of the property by one or more cotenants to the exclusion of one or more cotenants during any period, whether annually reoccurring or not which is binding upon any assignee or future owner of a fractional fee interest or if such agreement Conti; sues to be in any way binding or effective u,uun any cotenant for the sale o.' u~~y ~;,terest in tl~~e prope~~ty. 6 FRACTIONAL FEE CLUB: A fractional fee project in which each condominium unit, pursuant to recorded project documentation as approved by the Town of Vail, has no fewer than six (6) and no more than twelve (12) owners per unit and whose use is established by a reservation system. Each of the fractional fee club units are made available for short-term rental in a managed program when not in use by the club members. The project is managed on-site with a front desk operating twenty four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week providing reservation and registration capabilities. The project shall include or be proximate to transportation, retail shops, eating and drinking establishments, and recreation facilities. FRACTIONAL FEE CLUB UNIT. A condominium unit in a fractional fee club described as such in the project documentation and not an accommodation unit within the fractional fee club. . _ .TIME-SH. ARE ESTATE: Atime,-share estate shall.be defined.in accordance with :. .• • f Colorado Revised Staiutes section :~8-~~-110. ~ ~ ~ . 'TIME-SHARE LICENSE: A contractual right to exclusive occupancy of specified premises; provided, that the occupancy of the premises is divided into five (5) or more separate time periods extending over a term of more than two (2) years. The premises may consist of one parcel, unit or dwelling or any of several parcels, units or dwellings identified at the time the license is created to be identified later. No time share is a time-share license if it meets the definition of interval estate, time-share or time-span estate. USE: The purpose for which a site or structure or portion thereof is arranged, designed, intended, erected, moved, altered, or enlarged, or for which either a site or structure or portion thereof is or may be occupied or maintained. VI. ZONING ANALYSIS Lot size: 1.19 acres or 51,836 sq. ft. Zoning: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 (LMU-1) Land Use Plan Designation: Ski Portal Current Land Use: Residential Development Standard Allowed by LMU-1 Existin Lot Area: min. 0.23 acres or 1.19 acres or 10,000 sq. ft. 51,836 sq. ft. Height: ave. 71', max. 82.5' 36' to 74' (< 71' ave.) Setbacks: 10' on all sides min 10', except for decks, etc Site Coverage: 70% or 36,285 sq. ft. 41 % or 20,983 sq. ft. Landscaping: 2C ;•~ or 10,367 sq. ft. 22°~ or i 1, i 33 sq. ft. inciuuiny Tract A to east 7 Parking: 148 spaces 114 spaces (grandfathered) GRFA: 250%GRFA per buildable Site area or 129,590 sq. ft. 87,590 sq. ft. Density: 33% increase or 93.1 units 92 units EHU'S = 0 density 7 units Loading/Delivery: 1 berth required 1 berth (provided) Chapter Seven of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, along with the Lionshead Mixed Use -1 zone district, prescribe the development standards for the property. Staff believes the proposed plan complies with the applicable development standards prescribed for the property with the exception of parking. In the case of the parking requirement there is a deficient of 34 spaces. The applicant is requesting a parking _ .__- - - -- - vECtic^ "lll of this rno^icru^dur~: _. _ VII. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Land Use North: Mixed Use South: Open Space East: Mixed Use West: Mixed Use Zoning Lionshead Mixed Use-1 District Agricultural and Open Space District Lionshead Mixed Use-1 District Lionshead Mixed Use-1 District VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Consideration of Factors: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. A major development objective of the Town is the redevelopment and improvement of the Lionshead Village. The Antlers Redevelopment proposal approved in 1999 helped to achieve this through the new addition of 22 new dwelling units, the facelift of the existing building, and improvements to the streetscape, bike-ped path and landscaping. In the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District accommodation units are not a requirement as it is in other zone districts. The addition of time-share units in this development increases the likelihood that there will be higher occupancy rates throughout the year which is directly connected to the number of visitors in Town during any given time period. This is likely as a family who only owns 13 weeks of occupancy a year will tend to visit Town more often. A plausible effect may also be that the time-share owners will be more likely to open there units to short-term rental as they are accustomed to sharing their unit with multiple families. A whole unit owner can be hesitant to open there unit to the use of others. This will help to boost the occupancy rate potentially. Staff beii~~~ ii~~e impacts of the addition of a iii~ited number of time-share units to be positive in providing for higher occupancy rates, and in turn a greater number of visitors to the Town. Staff would suggest that 20% or 18 units of the total 92 units be granted a conditional use permit under this application. This would be approximately 17,518 square feet (87,590 x .2) of GRFA on the site. The Association would be responsible for determining which of the remaining units could be allowed to converted to time-share units. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. The proposed use should not have any significant negative effect on these factors. The mass and design of the proposal have been reviewed _ by the Design Review Board and does not change with this request. The proposal should draw more users to the Lionshead Village Area. Vehicular access has been reviewed by the Public Works Department; and the applicant _ has contributed to the off-site., roadway -improvements ..... .. ~. ' ~furid. Utilities and schools should not be heavily impacted. ' '3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. The proposal has been reviewed for its effect on transportation by the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department had requested numerous changes which have been incorporated into the built product. The number of parking spaces required for time share/dwelling units is 1.7 spaces per unit. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The applicant met several times with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board during the planning process and had made many changes to the proposal based upon their comments. The finished product conforms with the purpose of the Land Use Designation as Ski Portal and with the goals and purpose of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District. Details of the goals and purposes are found in Section V of this memorandum. The addition of the time- share units will have no noticeable negative affect on the surrounding properties. The surrounding properties offer lodging to .owners and visitors in a similar manner as the Antlers Condominiums does currently and is proposing to offer. 5. If the proposal for a fractional fee club is a redevelopment of an existing facility, the fractional fee club shall maintain an equivalency of accommodation units as are presently existing. Equivalency Tall be maintained either by an equal number of units or by square footage. If the proposal is a new development, it shall provide at least as much accommodation unit gross residential floor area 9 (GRFA) as fractional fee club unit gross residential floor area (GRFA). Not Applicable 6. Lock off units and lock off unit square footage shall not be included in the calculation when determining the equivalency of existing square footage. Not Applicable 7. The ability of the proposed project to create and maintain a high level of occupancy. The addition of the proposed quarter-share time-share units will allow the .. .ie :ii. - 1-. -~ rn.n# 1 nrnr-ern r+s ~~+. h ~ ~ `.`J~ .. 1"~ "1 1 - -- -,........._...__...._.------___ hoeen..highrnr•-cc^,.;~po^cy-yvar raw^d. 4 M~Yiarter,-share tim°-sharp knit -- --...,.. v ..~ . differs from aone-fiftieth time-share in that each owner gets 13 weeks ' which are divided up over the four seasons. This form of division provides for each owner to have access during both peak and shoulder seasons creating less likelihood that an owner would cease payment of their dues therefore forcing the property management to foreclose on the property. In a market such as the Town of Vail's a quarter-share time- share allows all owners to experience both the height and shoulder seasons. 8. Employee housing units may be required as part of 'any new or redeveloped fractional fee club project requesting density over that .allowed by zoning. The number of employee housing units required will be consistent with employee impacts that are expected as a result of the project. Not Applicable 9. The applicant shall submit to the town a list of all owners of existing units within the project or building; and written statements from one hundred percent (100%) of the owners of existing units indicating their approval, without condition, of the proposed fractional fee club. No written approval shall be valid if it was signed by the owner more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of filing the application for a conditional use. Not Applicable 10. Each of the fractional fee club units shall be made available for short term rental in a managed program when not in use by the club members. The project shall include or be proximate to transportation, retail shops, eating and drinking establishments, and recreation facilities. Not Applicable 10 B. Findings The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. . _ . - _ _ __ - F -`~- ~~~~'- ~~- ~ -' ~ ~~~'" ~' ~. ~~° i nat the proposed-use would compry-with each of the applicabie provisions of the conditional use permif section o~f the zoriing ` code. IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit request to allow for up to 18 time-share units on the first floor of a building or above, located at 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead 3~d Filing. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria listed in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, subject to the following findings: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District. 2. That the proposed location of the' use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the conditional use permit to allow for time share units on the first floor of a building or above, located at 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block, Lionshead 3~d Filing, staff recommends the following condition: 1. That the applicant meets the "Time-share Units Disclosure Requirements" outlined in Chapter 4 Section 4 Article A of the Vail Town Code prior to the marketing of the time-share units. 11 X. ATTACHMENTS A. Affidavit of Publication B. Publication Notice C. Letter from Applicant D. Site Plan E. Floor Plans . F. Unit Layouts G. Chapter 4 Section 4 Article A "Time-share Units Disclosure Requirements" of the Town Vail Code H. Minutes of June 24, 2002 Planning and Environmental Commission 12 f3 I'1'~M 1NAS~ Ah`FEC'J' F~ROP~RTY' - ng ( oot enn s ours ; , ~ .11) request',for a rrla)or euE>divlslon Id eccord• . ;RU91:IC NQTICL ' -ante with Tlge 14 :Chapter-S; Vag Town.Code; and eetdng forth det1311s Irt regdids (hereto; located at - L 1 ote 1 end 12, Btodc 2; Va(F Villagge .12th Fil(ng NOTIC$19 IiER~BY GIVEN tfiattlte Penningg arM. end Tract C, Block ~, Vail Village 12th.Flgrtg; ErMronmentel Commlaslon of the Town of Vell wilt hold a pubic hearing In accordance with Section 12-3.8 of the Munlolpal Code of the Town of Veil Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Braun Aesocletes Inc on July 22, 21702, at 2:00 P.M. In the Towh of Vail fyk,~picipal Building. in conslderetlon ot: , . Planner: Russ Forrest A request tar a final review of a condltlonel' use ppermit, td allow for time share unite on the flrat ~ applicetlona end information about the p'ropoe- als are evellabe for public InBpectlon during regu•. lei office hours In Ilte pproJed planner's office l t fiver of a building or above, located et rite Antlers , oca • ed et the' Town of Vall Community Development Cnndominluma, 680 West Llonehead PlaceJLot 3, Block 1 Llonsheed 3rd Flling Department, 75 Souih Frontage Road. The public , . Is Invited to attend project oiiantation and the silo ApptkanC AnOers Condominlum Aesoda0on, reae t d b R b L i vlaits That precede the ublic hearing In the Town of Vatl Community Development -- Department rep s n y o ev ne please cell a7g,2t981dr Information A request for a reremmAnrlatinn M,th \)all Tnwn Slgn.lenquage Interpretation available upon re- t'y, ~tl, gq.hc~::raL.;a;..;;,,, ^,agg( ' iv Council to of an amendment to Secflon 12.7A•7 (Hel ht)), Yag_Town,Code, to Increase Me maxt• t ' l l l e' , y q„ v 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for In- lormatlnn. n ai otya }I lding heigght Ill the Public tw Aceommedatidn Zone Di trlCL ~ s ' ' Comnwrntlt QtYJ01 ant De rtment Publi>ihedJrt theV~atl J ~6 AppllOenh ' ~06 Laifer,•rapresonted -- y. u y , 2002 ' ~ .ti~y:;lay Paterson ~ Planner: ,. },peorge Ruther ~ `., . I A roqueef tar a Hnel review and recomittontfatJotiti~ QRD(NANCE N0: 11 . '' of the totlowing eppllcetlons related to the ''.• ~ S~faI~S faF2002 - - proposed redevelopment of the Vall ~ Meunteln School; qN ORDINANCEMAKING SUPPLEMENTAL AP• PROPRIATIONS'TO THE TOWN: OF VAIL GEN- T) Arequest der a recommendation to the Veil Town Council to rezone 3010 Booth Falls Road/Lot ERAL _ElyNO;`.'CAPITAL: -PROJEQTS FIIND, HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND, REAL ESTATE 11, Blook 2, Vell Village 12th Filing from Two- Family ResldenUel to General Use; TRANSFER TAX FUND, AND THE DISPATCH SERVICES FUND OF THE 2002 BUDGCT FOR 2)r-A request for a recommendation to the Vall THE TOWN OF VAIL COLORADO: AND AU- THORtZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID AP Town.Coundl tc rezone Tract C, 81odc t, VaI1~Vll- loge 12th Flting from Two-Famlty Realdential to : - PROPRIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD TNERE General Uae; . - TO 3 A request for a recommeridatlon to amend the o~~ief Town of .Yell Land Use Map for Tract C; . Ludwig Kurz, Mayor _~ :. , Blook 1, Vell'Vikagga 12th Fllingg from Low Densl Rasldentlal W PubIIcJSomhPubllC; ti ATTEST' ' "1,~';.~ • Lorolel Donaldson, Towp ClerlP~- 4) A .request for an amendment to the previouel approved developrttent plan end a new condltlonel READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED P use permit for aprlvete educetlanel instltutlon and ~ UBLISHED this 2nd de of Jul 2002 Y Y an eobve outdoor recreetlon area on 3010 Booth Fafia Roed/Lot 1 t, Block 2, Vell Village 12th Fling Published In the 1/ell Daily Juty 5, 2002. 3180 N. Frontage Road Eastla pert of Lot 12, B I ck 2, Vail Village 12th Flling; --- - 5) A r GGuetat for a condltlonel use permit to allow for th~doriatnictlon of eight Typo III EHUs located a~Rp1h.1NC@ NO.3 ' on Trect Block 1 Vetl Villa a 12th Flting ` ` SERIES 2002 ' / %~ .1V J. .lu, ~ U' IIUIIiUilal UtlC'lltll'I II IW glfUVr for a prl~efe' educational I a etlhrtlo tlv d t AN ac n n n a ou - door recreetlon area located et 3160 N.'Frontage ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE. OF TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO SALES TAX Rd. EaeVa part of Lot 12. Stock 2, Vall VIIIaOa 12th REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SL'RIES 20028; filing; ~ PROVIDING THE FORM, TERMS AND CONDI- 7I.4 request fora fora condltlonel use permit to of-. low for lampoYgry modular classroom strudures Iri- TIONS OF TFIE 20028 BONDS, THE MANN(;R ANO TERMS, OF ISSUANCE, THE MANNER OF cared et 31u0 N. Frontage Rd. EesU a pert of Lot 12, Block 2, Vall Vlllaga 12th Flling; EXECUTION, THE METHOD OF PAYMENT AND ' THE SECURITY THEREFOR; PLEDGING SALES 8) A raqueat for a recommendation to the Volt . TAX REnVENUES OP THE TOWN FOR THE PAY- Town Caundl to modlly the olflclal Town of Vall MENT OF THE 20028 BONDS; PROVIDING Rockfell Hazard Map to Indicate approved ntlllge- CERTAIN CONVENANT8 AN0 OTHER DETAILS tbn for 3180 N. Frontage Roed/LOt 12, Bock 2, . AND MAKING OTFIER PROVISIONS ~CONCERN- Valt Vfliage 12th Fliling; . ING'THE 2002B.BONDS, TtfE SALES TAX REV- ' 0) A request fora recommendation to ,the Vell ENUES AND THE REFUNDING PROJECT; RAT(- ' ' Town Council for a text amendment to Section 12- FYING ACTION PREVIOUSLY TAKEN ANO AP- 8A-8 (Density), Vall Town Code, to emend the PERTAINING THERETO; REPEALING ALL ORDI- G FA requirements In the Ag end open Space 7~pne Dlstrld; NANCES IN CONFLICT HEREYVITH. ' i0) A request for a variance trtxn Section to 72-BA- 5 (Lot Area end She Dlmanslats) to allrnv fora eubdlvl9lon ceedn a lot which a less thah 35 Ordineitce No. 3 Series of 2002, was approved an Ilrst reeding on .~anuary 15, 2002, end published In ll J f 2 g ; ' on ertuery u 0, 2002r Coples•of• Ordinance. Nb.: accae, located Sf, l.Dt, J ~n Q(Qpk 2f iVA16VIild9e r12tp:. 3~a 6(~A bt ~1 r~5nr~ nw k,. ~J9a&kr c yd' ~ ~~~r~~,~ .. _ ~ ... rY., r . r .I r~/~, Attachment: A :as~aT vail ~.antlersvail.com Nest Lionshead Place iil, Colorado 81657 '.S AT VAlL itlersvail.com Lionshead Place olorado 81657 ~R~v~t `~ W V ~~~ ~ ~,.., S Q v~t-'~ ~~o rte.. -~ /,. .: _'~:-. O VNTY'?'i.J ~~$u/ZT~ ~ IBS ~ . ~~ ~. , .. ~00 C.~~ ~ ~ ~, , _ ~ -~ Att~~hment: B THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on July 22, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, to allow for time share units on the first floor of a building or above, located at the Antlers Condominiums, 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead 3~d Filing. Applicant: 'Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Rob Levine Planner: George Ruther/Warren Campbell A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to of an amendment to Section 12-7A-7 (Height), Vail Town Code, to increase the maximum allowable building height in the Public Accommodation Zone District. p nnls~ant • .Rnh I' ~7I?f •.ranrQCentar-l by lav Patargnn ,• ~' < .: " _ ., _ _ _, .._ _.. __: _- _~_ . P.langer: _ _ __ Georae Ruther A request for a final review and recommendations of the following applications related to the proposed redevelopment of the Vail Mountain School: 1) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to rezone 3010 Booth Falls Road/Lot 11, Block 2, Vail Village 12t" Filing from Two-Family Residential to General Use; 2) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to rezone Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12t" Filing from Two-Family Residential to General Use; 3) A request for a recommendation to amend the official Town of Vail Land Use Map for Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12'" Filing from Low Density Residential to Public/Semi- Public; . 4) A request for an amendment to the previously approved development plan and a new conditional use permit for a private educational institution and an active outdoor recreation area on 30.10 Booth Falls Road/Lot 11, Block 2, Vail Village 12~" Filing and 3160 N. Frontage Road East/a part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Vil-age 12t" Filing; 5) A request foC a_ conditional use permit to allow for the construction of eight Type III ,_ .:. EHUs Located on Tract C, Block 1 Vail Village 12t" Filing; . _. .,., - 6) Arequest for a conditional use permit to allow for a'priv'ate educatioriai trstit~luori"dnd~ active outdoor recreation area located at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. East/a part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing; 7) A request for a for a conditional use permit to allow for temporary modular classroom structures located at 3160 N. Frontage Rd. East/ a part of Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12t" Filing; 8) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to modify the official Town of Vail Rockfall Hazard Map to indicate approved mitigation for 3160 N. Frontage Road/Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12t" Filling; 9) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a text amendment to Section 12-8A-8 (Density), Vail Town Code, to amend the GRFA requirements in the Ag and Open Space Zone District; 10) A request for a variance from Section to 12-8A-5 (Lot Area and Site Dimensions) to allow for a subdivision creating a lot which is less than 35 acres, located at Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12~" Filing (Booth Falls Tennis Courts); 11) A request for a major subdivision in accordance with Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regards thereto, located at Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12~" Filing and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12t" Filing. j 1 Attachment: B ~h-Ie~ Nl ~'" ANTLERS AT VAIL .w„a,,,~<,_,~ ~ ~~m MEMORANDUM To: Town of Vail, Community Development From: Robert Levine, General Manager _ .. ._ _ .. r - . --~~- -- - --- - -- ----- .._.. _ _ , . ~ -- - - ~ Date:-su!?e-~2,~?~~~_.. ~ .~. _. _ - b - .:_, . _ . Subject: Fractional Fee Conditional Use for Antlers Redevelopment Please be advised that the Antlers Condominium Association wholeheartedly supports and approves the sale and use of fractional fee units for the remainder of the new condominiums, built as part of the Antlers redevelopment. In accordance with the prescribed amendment procedures, the Association has recently adopted a supplement to the Condominium Declaration and an :.. arrer~d~rent tc the Bylaws which accommoda±es the sale and use of such : ..: --- ._.---- __.-- fractional fee units. Please call me if there are any questions. Attachment: C 680 West Lionshead Place Vail, Colorado 81657 (970) 476-2471 FAx (970) 476-4146 info@antlersvail.com AfYTLERS AT VAIL www.antlersvail.com A. The Antlers Condominium Association, as developer and seller of the property's new condominiums, wishes to market some or all of the remaining condominiums as fractional fee units, specifically quarter shares. Each of the quarter share owners wilt have the right to use their specific unit 13 weeks out of the year, and will be encouraged to make their condominium available for short term rentals when they're not using it, just like all of the "whole" owners. B. There is a tendency for "high-end" purchasers to rent out their, units less, or IIVId L`dll. t:l i.ivii "vC.7ifUliiliil fii.71i7:y~C9~t~vii ~., a~ :..~:! ~...:.+o ....~ -,-':.v~-: ~. ~. :......- :.~ ~. ::. -'... - i1• _ 1 L year":- JII ILA l11C tUWf I u@aEi Il~'j Gri ,alCj ~aX revel ii.ica w ,l,vvcf i i lu~,i ~ G~ i S' .. ._. _.. ._, .expenses, these empty units or "cold beds" do nothing to support the town's economy. The owners of fractional fee units are already sharing their property with others, and they will be much more likely to rent the unit out when they're not using it themselves. Although the incidence of owner usage will probably go up as well (since there are more owners), whether it's them or a paying guest who stays there, each will eat in the restaurants, shop in the shops and ski on the mountain. The town's sales tax revenues will clearly improve with the higher year-round occupancy. - In terms of the physical development objectives of the Town, this conditional use causes no difference whatsoever. This is evidenced by the fact that.the building was already built with whole ownership in mind. The change to - fractional fee units has little or'no impac on-tne-pnysica pant: -:~- -" -- ` ~~ --'~ ~" -~-~ -~ -~ - - ._,.~. C, D, & E. There will be no change whatsoever from the development as it was approved in the spring of 2000. The impact of the Antlers on the surrounding environment and infrastructure will be no different whether the condominiums are owned by a single party or four separate parties ... other than the propensity to be rented out more, as mentioned above. Since the original redevelopment was approved with the clear hope and expectation that the units would be rented and constitute "warm beds", this change to fractional ownership does nothing other than further that objective. Unlike some fractional fee clubs, which allow the owners to use the facilities (parking, etc.) even when it's not "their" time, the Antlers will not encourage that. The capacity and use of the property, and hence the impact on traffic, etc. will be no different than when it is currently in full occupancy. Attachment: C 680 West Lionshead Place Vail, Colorado 81657 (970) 476-2471 FAx (970) 476-4146 infoCantlersvail.com 1 i F - _ °'" i~~ ~ SITE PLAN ~ -~ ~ SCALE: 1" 40'-O" ,:/~ s ~~`- e % a i ~ ~_Y..z_4 ~/p ~ ~ o=- 1 NORTH ~' ~ 2 - ,~ Npf ~ a s• Is• w• • ~ _ST ~-^~`.=~._, _ ~pC' 1 NEW CONDO UNITS / ,,~ .1..._ i _~~" ~ e 2 NEW FITNESS/CONFERENCE f/'~ ; ,i +e @~• 3 EXISTING UNITS '. p _ ~ ~` 4 LOBBY +f/ ~ ,~~ _ ,J~ ~ ' ~~ 5 OFFICES /, 'y _ -~ ' 1 _; ~ssPr 1 ~- J ~ I ~f . 1' ~. • B ~ ~~~ ~1 O ~ O I~ , ~ i~~.F. - _-:~ - LL `C* _ /, 1 I 5 5 ~ I I ~~~ ~ - - 4 ~ CC ' i~.;7 1 ~ ~ i= V ,. ~,. +' _ ~~ ~ ~ ' Q ' i t ~ ~ ~ ~ ,; 3 3 +3 '3 3 3 ._ . 3 3 3 3 o - ~ ' --- - '~ ~ - _ ------_~_-- ------ ----- ---- ------ -- ..d_J ~ _ J POOL _~~ ~: ~ y; <:: -- o U ,~/, ~ ~ _~~ ~~ '~~' ' ~ GORE CREEK ,. .. ,% ~`~!> __ _ ___ ._._....... v M . ~' ~... I'., i ' .. .'. I, .. .. .. .. . ~i~ '~ 'I~ ~ ~,,~.,% O ~. / c~ . P~ / .~/i-~/ / t/ I ~,1 //• O , :' /` ~ .. , % - , i I I ~~ >r ~ ,Y <Y ~` ~ I I , I ~ ,- i ~ ,~ - ~ . I: I ~ r ~} s rr ~ i i r~ r `~ t , ~ {> =. .~II ~ .~ I .!j'.~', i ~ ~ "' • r ~ li'. - ~ , w ~ ~ ~, ~ - c , ~9d °•~ FLOOR 3 ~ /s .e~t~ __= l [- ~ ~' 'yA 5 t> ?~~- 0 S' 15' 40' -1 a - ~` ~ NORTH ~~. ? .~ ~ „o ~ ~ 6 - ~~ ~ LEGEND - o„ ti~ : ~ _. ` ,\ I NEW CONDO UNITS «„ - t~ - 6~ ~c'•~ 2 NEW FITNESS ROOM ~ ?~ ,b4 3 EXISTING UNITS . I r ~~ •',: i, ~ '"/~:' ~ ~ 4 LOBBY '\ 5 OFFICES ~ ?~ ~~ ~ i' ~ - I I •\,1 6 PLANTER s ~ t w r ~. r ~ i r o 11 .. ~~; ~ * ~ - ~ ~ ~~"~ a~ ~,~, rrr h~ k -l r~. ;j ~= 6 {} s'~, _ - ~ i~- rte' ~; .s'I ~~ ~~ `~ .c ~_ Q '~'~' _ v~ a` O I, ' ,~~J~ ~ ." .r `.. I I-s >,~'~.y#t_-1~ I~~-=-!!-:-°~I_ ~ n ~ I - 'tip 'pro ,°~ - ~'l l ,. ~ _ ~... ,_,._ >._ .-~. ur i ~ ~ , ~ ! ~ -cr' ~ , ~ ~ -"`--:e.t.a-..Z:.-~'j~ 3 - I I I I I~ J, , ~I ~_.i. e . _i; _.: r ,. 'r f .I ~ ~' . .. .. .. i V..~ •~ o --- _ ~: / j '\q~ ~'. ~ ~ I ~~' 4 ~ FLOOR 4 ADDITION /' r ~ , w, .~ \ ~~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~~ r NORTH .~ ,- - -- . - ~~ ~; .. ,. __ ~ . /•' ,; -- i`~ ;, - -,~ ~ \''~ \~~Z 1 NEW CONDO UNITS /'~ '~ - ;' ~ 'ti. ~\ 2 NEW FITNESS ROOM -' i.7 C. ~ . \~ 3 EXISTING UNITS // i~ '~~' ~ 2 '~6~' ~ *~\, ~ 4 ROOF BELON' 5 OFFICES I; / ~ 6 PLANTER i~ 0 L .~ I. I s --~-- ~ •'~ w ., ,..' ., . ~ .. _. q,F ...._.~__ , .._w sr ~; _ ,; ~ ' ~ s -f~ li I 4 `r='- Ir, ~ I ` p 4 `°. ° 3 I ~, ~ ; .. .. _- n ..un ... .. .. ... .... _.. .. .,7 -., ~, - ..._. ~. L i I k' I. %, .. .. ,E .. i `I i . I _ s y ~..~ e y 1 1 i II ' ~ I ~, {I r ~; _ I .y ' '~~,_.~; =i ;~ ~- ~ ~r. ; ;~ ; FLO0 ~~~ F ~ R 5 ADDITION is ~ ~ II 1,t1, >~>~ ~! , - I i. -'~.. -`:~, 1 NE1f CONDO UNI?9 II ; 1 1 !; ''`~•,~ ''-~~ 2 NEIf CONFERENCE ROO1S '~ ;; 3 EXISITNG ' ~~ UN1T3 ' ~'~.. 1 ~~ ~ ~ p,, L `~. / I r; ~. _• 1 -- ~ j~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ I I ~ I _ i _~ ~ !' '~ i ~~ ~- I ~ j ~ ~ ~. r--- - 9 i I !~ t ~"~~; ii ~ j = _ `, I I '~~1 ` ~ ~~ I ~~;, ~1 !! I it it `~ ~ .~ _ I ~~ _ ..._... _ .... ... . ~ i ! j ~ ~ ~ ~! i! !!; j ' i ~ ~ -----~ ' `iI ! ' j ; ~ j~ - I I i f 1 - ~, I i ~ II ~i~~j I I ~; ii I r I ~~ ~I ~~~ ~ ° 3 I ~; .. ..,, . j --'-- , - .. ... .. .. . - ~. ~ e -_~_ , i, ~, 4 ' , ' I.. I j - _ .-r- I I I i i I I I i I I /' - ~- --•-.~-+~ - I -• i ~II _~,~L~~,yr--~~ r J i r--~~f~tii - ... .~ __ - i _~- _~~~_ _ -- --- - ,I.. „~. . ~ ~ .~ - ! - i `. ? , -~< ~/; ;.~; V; iE ;_-+~ -a~ ~ I II ~ l ~ ~ i, Q I I ` ~ K ` I - J l II I ~ i .., ~ "` ~ n nll ~J .i~'+`~~ r _~ _ .. ~ ~ II i ~ . . I i -- ii ' ;,. ~, ; . - ;;~ ~II ~i 1 ~~~ ~_ j ~~ rl~' `;~ `~'~ - - ... ~; i ', _ ~ ~~ I ~- ..~~~ . - I II I ---_- ~ III i -- ~ , 1 __ _ ~ ... A ~I ' j~ ~ ., ~~ ~ _ ~ _. _ ~~ ; _ ~ , 3 E'LOOR 7 ADDITION ~~ I ~ NORTl-i 0 5' 15' 4p' LEGEND `~. 1 NEW CONDO UNITS 2 - 3 EXISTWG UNITS ~\ ,,\11 ~~„ .~ ~..~ ~~, ~~ ~._~ J 3 0 3 W -~k: .': • ~ ~ I '\ ~ , U \ .. ,~ c0 ~ a i ~ ''1 ~~ ~, uarr ~~ O tm ~~i~ • '~ ~!G~ f T ~a ,, t. -.J Q ''~ ~ UNIT 517 '-~ z _ ..~ . f, ~.~~n..... ~ -- - 1 ~ ~ y 1y `~~ s,', ` } x -0c Ica ter- ~ ~; o->•+.r : i R` ;rte ~;".Y3.~ r_~ ~a1. 481. az1 ~•~~->n.-- o Y~.- ~ ~a~.~ai. uru~'-- _ ma=r= T. ~ Z ~ io-1n ~- I 1 R..~~r I 1 ; r~~^ ~ ~ OJ ~__ .~~,~ -~ _~ ~ ~ '~`~''~-` ~' UNITS 321, 421, 521, 316, 31':r, 416, 417 ~ ~ .~; ~ . t/~' - t'-o- (~ c¢, ea. vmm,. mr~ ~,n«a .~ r>:u~ muw ~~ ~~- O r-- 'i ... Snrnn• merit. ~/p tytrr Q ~ C tia 1/i' ~ 1'-4' ~ I~~.~. / J O CG I i I K.4.~ ' '~' i ~~.~ mgt ,x, !i~ ~' ~ - n+ ~ '' " ~ O ~ ........ ~ Q k I J i. I I I ~ L _ ~ I ~~.. .'i ~ ~. ~ -r~o.. n ,~ ~ .r...,_ r ,r ..... -=i r1Nrr 3~n _ ,,,. _ ,,~. ~ Ai T r .;. ~~'. r ~~~ ~_ Y i I _ '-~•-~ I vrur ~ a 711 L l Y { 4 _ O .._.. "_ i _ r \ I ~ ''' I ~ L - - ---~ - O ~~_.._ ~ - __ - UNIT 518 FLOOR 1 r ~4 r° . .,fit---. t ~~i ~~ - ~ ~... _~ .~.~ I ~;~; ,, ~, ~ ~~Y` ,.~ :~ ,~„,~, ~,,,_ ~n'-c~"9 318. dlB i r 1 ~ r~+l~' ~~ i I '~ ~ O II' ~ i r Q o ~sti~~'i ' 1-- C/] F- UNITS 318 ~;~+t,)~- 418 -- ~ ;~ ~~~~ - ~~-a~ (mm su mvnr~t. ~7 7~ ~y~ ~ ~\ -----.-- - - -r ---- ~ ~ ~ -- °j ;; _. r '_ __. ~I^ ._ _ _.. ,._, - ~,', . rrnut. r/a car ~ _ Q SQr.ri ~ ~.~ . ~- ~Y=, I I ~ ~.... ~~-~'! ~.. .~~ _ .. _ . _. . ~- m . wn.~r~u-- - _ _ UNITS 518519 FI C (1R 2 -- i. .. ~ 1 ~ ~ {tl ~ h. i J IY i . . ' ,' 'y _.I. LLLY f . I, ~ _ - T"1 ~. ~ ~ v ~!. 4-4A-1 4-4A-2 CHAPTER 4 TIME-SHARE UNITS ARTICLE A. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS SECTION: 3. A disposition by government or governmental agencies. 4-4A- 1: Applicability; Exemptions 4-4A- 2: Public Offering Statement; 4. A disposition by foreclosure or deed General Provisions in lieu of foreclosure. 4-4A- 3: Conversion Property 4-4A- 4: Time-Share Securities 5. A transfer to which Section 4-4A-7 4-4A- 5. t)ocuments `i'o, ~fansteree of this Article relating fo i•esales~=ap- - - ,.._.. -_.: ~- 4-4A- 6: Right~To~~Rescrid_ __.-..._. ~ _ - -., . plies. (Ord. 27(1980)-~~ j) ~ -- --_ ..-_. _ - _._ 4-4A- 7: Resale Of Time Shares 4-4A- 8: Deposits Placed In Escrow 4-4A- 9: Labeling Promotional Material 4-4A-2: PUBLIC OFFERING STATE- 4-4A-10: Developer's Obligation To MENT; GENERAL PROVI- Complete Improvements SIONS: _ 4-4A-11: Remedies For Violations A. Content: A public offering statement must contain or fully and accurately disclose: 4-4A-1: APPLICABILITY; EXEMP- TIONS: A. This Article applies to all time-share - units, which shall include "time-share estates", "fractional fees", and "time- .. sharre_ license", as defined in.Title 13, _ . _. -. _ _ Chapter 2 of this Code relatrn4 to subdivisions, except as provided in subsection B of this Section. B. A public offering statement need not be prepared or delivered in the case of: 1. A gratuitous transfer of a time share. 2. A disposition pursuant to court order. 1. The name of the developer and the principal address of the developer and the unit or units offered in the state- ment; :. 2. A, 9eneral description_ of the time- share units, rncludinq,__without limita- __ tion, the developer's schedule of com-~ F mencement and completion of all buildings, units, and amenities; Town of Vail 3. As to all units offered by the devel- oper in the same project: a. The types and number of units, b.ldentification of units that are time-share units, Attachment: G 4-4A-2 c. The maximum number of the developer's units that may become time-share units, d. A statement of the maximum number of time shares that may be created, or that there is no maximum, and e. The number or proportion of time shares the developer intends to mar- ket in blocks to investors; 4. Copies and a brief narrative de- scription of the significant features of •h.!•. - .. r. ~1.._,.. nc{n.imnn4 _.onr{ .'f~Enll ~prLmantc rafarrari :,tn __thAre.in_ (Oth?r. than any plats and plans), copies of any contracts or leases to be signed by purchasers at closing, and a brief, narrative description of any contracts or leases that will or may be subject to cancellation by the time-share own- e rs; 4-4A-2 c. The projected common expense liability by category of expenditures for the time-share units, and d. The projected common expense liability for each time share; 6. Any services not reflected in the budget that the developer provides, or expenses that the developer pays and that he/she expects may become at any subsequent time a common ex- pense of the time shares and the projected common expense liability attributable to each of those services ,. ... , {fir pYrlcncPC ff1P !~Al:l`1, tImP ~SF~'~I re~~... ~. 7. Any initial or special fee due from the purchaser at closing, together with a description of the purpose and method of calculating the fee; 8. A description of any liens, defects, or encumbrances on or affecting the title to the time-share units; 5. Any current balance sheet and a projected budget for the time-share 9. A description of any financing of- units either within or as an exhibit to fered by the developer; the public offering statement, for one year after the date of transfer to a 10. The terms .and significant limita- purchaser, and thereafter the current tions of any warranties provided by budget, a statement of who prepared the developer, including statutory the budget, and a statement of the warranties and limitations on the en- budget's assumptions concerning forcement (hereof or on damages; r,... ._ .:_ - - _: _ .--- occupancy and inflation 'factors. 'The budget must include, without limita- 11. A statement of any judgments tion: against the developer and any associ- a. A statement of the amount, or a statement that there is no amount, included in the budget as a reserve for repairs and replacement, b. A statement of any other re- serves, Town of Vail ation or manager, the status of any I•" pending suits to which the developer and any association or mariager is a party, and the status of any pending suits material to the time-share units of which a developer has actual knowledge; Attachment: G 4-4A-2 12. A statement that any deposit made in connection with the purchase of a time-share wilt be held in an es- crow account until closing of the transaction; 13. Any restraints on alienation of any portion of any time share; 14. A description of the insurance coverage provided for the benefit of time-share owners; 15. Any current or expected fees or charges ~ to be paid by time-share owners tor•`ane: use ~ot `any 'aciities -- - `~elated ~fo the property; --~ -`- --` 16. The extent to which atime-share unit " may ~ become subject to a tax or other lien arising out of claims against other time-share owners of the same time-share unit; and 17. All unusual and material circum- stances, features, and characteristics of the property. " B. Disclosure Of Exchange Program, If Any: If the time-share owners are to be permitted or required to become members of or to participate in any program for the exchange of occupan- cy rights among themselves or with the time-share owriers of`-other time- ` share parcels or both, the public offer- ing statement or a supplement deliv= ered therewith must contain or fully and accurately disclose: 1. The manner in which the program is operated, the identity of the persons operating it, and any affiliation be- tween the program and the developer. 4-4A-2 2. Whether membership or participa- tion in the program, or both, are vol- untary or mandatory. 3. The costs or ranges of costs of membership and participation in the program as of a specified date not more than one year before the public offering statement is delivered to the purchaser, and whether those costs are payable to the developer, the persons operating the program, or the time-share owners with whom ex- changes are made. ~+. vvT~eifei'"diiu~fiow of"iy oP~t~12"~ZtiSS specified- h ~suosection ~3- of ~"this Section may be altered and, for, any such costs which are to be fixed on a case-by-case basis, the manner in which those costs are to be fixed in each case. 5. The number of time shares and time-share parcels involved in mem- bership or otherwise participating in the program, and the number of each that may be withdrawn from the pro- gram, as of a specified date not more than one year before the public offer- ing statement is delivered to the pur- chaser. C. Current Information Regarding State- ment ~xcnange fJtogram: H deveioper " promptly shall amend the public offer- ing statement to report any material change in the information required by subsection A of this Section and the public offering statement, or any sup- plement thereto, to report any material change known to such developer in the information required by subsection B of this Section. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) Town of Vail Attachment: G 4-4A-3 4-4A-3: CONVERSION PROPERTY: A. Additional Statement Content: The public offering statement for the time- share units in a conversion property must contain, in addition to the infor- mation required by Section 4-4A-2 of this Article: 1. A statement by the developer, based on a report prepared by an independent architect or engineer, describing the present condition of all structural components and mechanical and electrical installations material to '..,.,s,rl nn~n\iTGn+'nf_#1-~c ?imc_ sharp. !nits; --" .___~_ . _. __ .,._..__-_.-". _ - .A._ 2. A statement by the developer of the expected • useful life of each item re- ported on in subsection Al above or a statement that no representations are made in that regard; and 3. A list of any outstanding notices of uncured violations of the Building Code or other Municipal regulations, together with the estimated cost of curing those violations. B. Applicability: This Section applies only to units in which residential use is permissible. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-4: TIME-SHARE SECURITIES: If a time-share unit is currently regis- tered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United .States, a devel- oper satisfies all requirements relating to the preparation of a public offering state- ment of this Article if the developer delivers to the purchaser and files with the Town a copy of the public offering statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commis- sion. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-7 4-4A-5: DOCUMENTS TO TRANSFER- EE: Before transfer of a time share and no later than the date of execu- tion of any contract of sale, the developer shall provide the intended transferee with: a) a copy of the public offering statement and any amendments and supplements thereto, and b) the disclosures required in the case of resales by Section 4-4A-7 of this Article. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-6: RIGHT TO RESCIND: The transferee of any time-share unit shall have the right to rescind- the transac- " {~,,~ ~ ~.~#il }~.;ol~~o, n'clnr4 .~ 9 ~nY m~rin!nh+ .,f . - . - -- --a-. - -- . -.~ - - -" thP. third =.business day following the con-" summation 'or closing of the transaction, or delivery of the disclosures required by this Article, whichever is later, by notifying the developer of his/her intention to do so. The developer shall clearly and conspicuously notify the transferee, in writing, of the rights of the transferee under this Section. The developer shall also provide an adequate opportunity to the transferee to exercise his or her right of rescission. Within ten (10) days after receipt of a notice of rescission, the developer shall return to the transferee, any earnest money, or down payment given by the transferee to the developer. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-I: , It~:5a1;~; Or `1'IIVI~: SI-IARES: A. Disclosure Certificate: In the event of a resale of a time share by a time- ~'~ . " share owner other than a developer, the seller shall furnish to the purchas- er before execution of any contract for the sale, or otherwise before the transfer, a copy of. the governing in- strument (other than the plats and plans) and a certificate containing: Town of Vail Attachment: G 4-4A-7 1. A statement disclosing the effect on the proposed disposition of any right of first refusal or other restraint on alienation of the time share; 2. A statement setting forth the amount of the common expense liabil- ity and any unpaid common expense assessment or other sums currently due and payable from the seller; 3. A statement of any other fees pay- able by time-share owners; and 4. A statement of any judgments or otfier matters which aye .or -may oe • come liens agamst~ thetime -share -or -- - the time-share unit and the status of any pending suits which may result in such liens. B. ~ Contents Of Certificate: If the seller owns or offers for sale. more than an aggregate of twelve (12) time shares in more than one time-share unit in the same project and the managing C. entity of those time-share units is an association or manager, the seller shall include in the certificate fur- nished pursuant to subsection A of this Section: 1. A statement of any capital expendi- tures proposed by the managing entity for the current and fhe next succeed= ing fiscal year; 2. A statement of the amount of any reserves for capital expenditures and of any portions of those reserves D designated by the managing entity for any specified projects; 3. The most recent regularly prepared balance sheet and income and ex- pense statement, if any, for the grop- e rty; See Title 70 of this. Code for Building Codes. Town of Vail 4-4A-7 4. The current operating budget for the property; 5. A statement describing any insur- ance coverage provided for the benefit of time-share owners; 6. A statement as to whether the man- aging entity has knowledge that any alterations or improvements _ to the time-share unit violate any provision of the governing instrument; 7. A statement as to whether the man- aging entity has knowledge of any ~vioiafo7is -or 'the--rfeatth-or~-~t3uild~ng V ~ - . °~- Codes' with `respect to the~time=share unit, or any other portion of the prop- erty; and S. A statement of the remaining term of any leasehold estate affecting the property and the provisions governing any extension or renewal thereof. Certificate Provided Upon Request: Any association or manager, within ten (10) days after a request by a time-share owner, shall furnish a cer- tificate containing the information necessary to enable the time-share owner to comply with this Section. A time-share .owner providing a certifi- cafe pursuant to subsection A of this Section is riot liable to tFie purchaser for any erroneous information provid- ed by the association or manager and included in the certificate. Certificate Information Prevails: A purchaser is not liable for ariy unpaid common expense liability or fee great- er than the amount set forth in a cer- tificate prepared by an association or manager. A time-share owner is not liable to a purchaser for the failure or delay of an association or manager to Attachment: G 4-4A-7 provide the certificate in a timely man- ner. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-8: DEPOSITS PLACED IN ES- CROW: Any deposit made in connection with the purchase or reservation of a time share from a developer must be placed in escrow and held in an account designated solely for that purpose by a title insurance company licensed in this State, an institution whose accounts are insured by a governmental agency or instrumentali- ty until: +'nn f n 1imc~ nr rocr•iccinn nr --~--- . - - .. rua,,. o, th .. f_.- - _. .. such later time as may be specified in any contract of sale; B. Delivered to the developer because of purchaser's default under a contract to purchase the time share; or C. Refunded to the purchaser. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-9: LABELING PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL: If any improvement to the property is not required to be built, no promotional material may be displayed or delivered to prospective purchasers which describes or depicts that improve- ment unless the description or depiction of the improvement is conspicuously labeled or identified as "need not be built". (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-10: DEVELOPER'S OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE IMPROVE- MENTS: The developer shall complete all promised improvements described in the governing instrument and prommotional ma- terials. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) 4-4A-10 4-4A-11: REMEDIES FOR VIOLATIONS: ' In addition to all remedies pro- vided by law, the Town shall be authorized to enforce these time-share regulations as follows: A. Available Remedies: The Town, in addition to other remedies provided, may institute an injunction, manda- mus, abatement, or other appropriate action or proceeding to prevent, en- join, abate, remove an unlawful con- j struction, use, occupancy or convey- ance or to enjoin any developer from selling, agreeing to sell, or offering to . ..n11 . ,.. ..+ti...~ri;.... rn~vei~.• -~.h'dfiirei_yf~~~l --- - CO.T.~li2nra_.yylth tHa_, r~rrniiSjnnc~ pf thjs _-- .-- .. :. Article. B. Building Permit Withheld: No building permit shall be issued for any lot or parceled land which has been trans- ferred, conveyed, sold, or acquired in violation of this Article. Any transferee who acquires a time-share unit in violation of this Article without knowl- edge of such violation, or any subse- quent transferee, shall have the right to rescind and/or receive damages from any transferor. who violates the provisions of this Article. C. Approval Withdrawn: The Planning and Environmental Commission may withdraw ariy approval of a pan or plat or require certain corrective mea- sures to be taken following the deter- mination that information provided by the developer, or by anyone on his/her behalf, upon which a decision was based, is false or inaccurate. The Planning and Environmental Commis- sion shall cause written notice to be served on the developer, or his/her assignees, setting out a clear and concise statement of the alleged false Town of Vail Attachment: G 4-4A-10 ' or inaccurate information provided by the developer, or by agents on his or ,her behalf, and directing the developer. to appear at a time certain fora hear- ing before the Planning and Environ- mental Commission not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days after the date of service of no- tice. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall determine at the hearing the nature and extent of the alleged false or inaccurate information and shall have power, on good cause being shown, to withdraw any approv- al or require certain corrective mea- . " sures to be ~taKen: riowever, witnoraw- __ ._ .... ~.~- ~`~ al ot'approvai or imposition of correc= tive requirements shall not be an ex- clusive remedy on findings by the Commission that false or inaccurate information has been received, and any and all remedies provided by law may be exercised. (Ord. 27(1980) § 1) Town.bf Vail 4-4A-10 Attachment: G ;;~ conomics of doin business in Tow ~~ - Ro ~e Kjesbo had no . ditional commen Mr. Sh~ ley stated that if re businesses a Town. Doug Cah had no comment. Chas Bernha?n~t agreed with Mr. ~mb. for similar sign it would detract Rollie Kjesbo ma a motion to den he variance with e findings on pag three. D . g Cahill seconde the motion. Unani ous disapproval 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, of a text amendment to Title 12, Section 2-2, to amend the definition of "Fraction Fee Club" and to amend Title 12, Section 16-7A-8, to amend the Use Specific Criteria & Standards, and setting forth details,in regard Applicant: Rob Levine Planner: George Ruther Mr. Ruther made a presentation per the memo. Mr. Levine stated that if the Board agreed with the staff recommendation, he would be returning with a conditional use application. Mr. Shirley asked if Mr. Levine had spoken to tl~e other unit owners about this change to ownership of some remaining units. Mr. Ruther clarified that the Antlers Condo. Association owns the units, as it is before the Board with this request. Doug Cahill asked for some clarification from a previous meeting regarding the number of units which could be quarter share units. ivii . i~uii ~ci siaTeu %Tidi the nurr~uer Ur uruts is not regulated by:the Lode. Mr. Schofield suggested that what was being proposed did not fit any of the definitions for time-share type ownership. Mr. Lamb asked if the homeowner association was aware how economic shifts can affect these types of arrangements in ownerships. Mr. Levine stated that risk exists whether there is one or four owners. Mr. Schofield asked Mr. Ruther if he agreed that the intention was to regulate use, not operation. Mr. Ruther agreed. ~ Mr. Schofield asked what was being requested of the Board. Mr. Ruther stated that staff was looked for a statement regarding interpretation and implementation. He added that he would like to hear comments on the criteria for the 7 Attachment: H Approved 7/8/02 Approved 7/8/02 conditional use of time-share type units and fractional fee ownership. Mr. Shirley asked if staff would be bringing changes to the Code back to the Board. -_ Mr. Ruher stated, yes. ~ `~ Mr. Schofield stated for the record, that there was no public present. Doug Cahill stated to fix it. He stated that he would be seeing Rob again at a later date for the conditional use permit and would like to see the wording fixed. George Lamb had nothing to add. Rollie Kjesbo had nothing to add, except to simplify it. Erickson Shirley said George did a great job clarifying the issue and to continue with the change's as recommended by staff. ......, -. , ."....-......~~..:J4f. vii~!.~llti-'!:! J, ~U.C.C"...:..!1.~1:.'LLi:1~..Ui.~i ~.~~zai i~>>IL~~UUrI-,!J~ ,C.S.l..l.5_d1'1!~!,'~._~Ll~'l'L1c~ Cif! IBS !1 F? STaTF?C1 _ -.. +` ._ _ __ _ - ""- - that he believed tiiai the uses s~iould'be separaieu. He slated that he wanted to further - explore the distinction and at what point the Town should be out of these issues. He stated that if we are going to go through with this, we should explore it in other zone districts. He stated that the issue was clear in his mind in that we need clearer distinctions between each type of ownership. He stated that he wasn't sure if we should have specific numbers " .regarding ownership intervals. He sees an overlap in the definitions. He can't emphasize enough that when they originally looked at FFU, there was a definite intent to keep a distinction between FFU and TSU. Fie said we should thinking about it as it relates to an SDD. Likewise, if there are state statutes and we should be looking at those for direction, - assuming that we do not have a need to do something dramatically different. He supports George's recommendation, and wants to see the specific language. He then stepped down as chair, making Erickson Shirley chair so John could make the motion. John Schofield made a motion with the findings on pages 7 and 8 of the staff memorandum and an affirmation of the staffs interpretation. Doug Cahill seconded the motion. r he fTlG'iii;i'"i {~a5sed by a vie of 5-U. . 7. A request fora ecommendation t the Vail Town uncil .for the ado ion of two view corridors within L~onshead and to a end Section 12- 2-4 (Adoption of iew Corridors), it own Code to incl de View Corridor 1 and 2 in Title , as identified wi in the Lionshead R development Ma ter Plan. View C ridor 1 is locate pproximately at e main pe strian exit lookin southwest towar s the Gondola lift ine. View Corrid 2 is located appr imately from the edestrian plaza the east end of e Lifthouse Lodg looking south the Gondola lift ine. Amore spe ~fic legal descripti of the two view orridors is on file a the Community velopment Depa ment. Applicant: \ Town of. Vail Planner: Allison Ochs Allison Ochs pre ented an overvie of the staff reco mendation. -;- . Schofield aske if the maps Ms. chs was pointing o were to scale. Ms. chs stated that t y were not to sc le, but that she c Id have a map de with t building lines s. .wn. 8 Attachment: H ~~ ~- ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 1 ~~' n(fCU^.~.'.J ~~. , ll~loody's Investors Service 99 Church Street New York, New York 10007 July 24, 2002 Mr. Robert McLaurin Town Manager Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road _ Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. McLaurin: We wish to inform you that on July 23, 2002, Moody's Rating Committee assigned a Aa3 rating on the Town of Vail's General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A. In addition, we have assigned our rating of Al to the Town of Vail's Sales Tax Revenue Refimding Bonds, Series 2002B. In order for'us.to'maintain the currency of our ratings, we request that you provide ongoing disclosure, including ari-iual f;rianeial and statistical information. Moody's will monitor this rating and reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to revise or withdraw this rating at any time in the future. The rating as well as any revisions or withdrawals thereof will be publicly disseminated by Moody's through normal print and electronic media and in response to verbal requests to Moody's rating desk. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact the analyst or me assigned to this transaction, H. elen Cregger at (21.2) 553-4559. Sincerely, ~~~ Kenneth Kurtz Senior Vice President cc: Mr. Steven D. Jeffers, SVP George K. Baum & Co. 7] 7 Seventeenth St., Suite=2500 ~ ~~ Denver, CO 80202-3354 ~y o~ .~ ~ccee~...u °'~Y~ e .~~ July 24, 2002 i i Mr. Robert McLaurin Town Manager 1 Town of Vail j 75 South Frontage Roi__ Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. McLaurin: ~~ ~~ ~y~ `°,~~~ JUG ~ ~ ~ . L.. ~~:~ . IYloody's Investors Service 99 Church Street New York, New York 10007 We wish to inform you that on July 23, 2002, Moody's Rating Committee assigned a Aa3 rating on the Town of Vail's General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A. In addition, we have assigned our rating of Al to the Town of Vail's Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002B. In order for us to maintain the currency of our ratings, we request that you provide ongoing disclosure, including annual financial and statistical information. Moody's will monitor this rating and reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to revise or withdraw this rating at any time in the future. The rating as well as any revisions or withdrawals thereof will be publicly disseminated by Moody's through normal print and electronic media and in response to verbal requests to Moody's rating desk. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact the analyst or me assigned to this transaction, Helen Cregger at (212) 553-4559. Sincerely, ~~~ Kenneth Kurtz Senior Vice President cc: Mr. Steven D. Jeffers, SVP George K. Baum & Co. 717 Seventeenth St., Suite 2500 Denver, CO 80202-3354 -~~,- MoOdy's /nvestors Service Giobai Credit Research Munlclpal Credit Research New Issue Published 23 Jul 2002 Vail (Town o fl CO Contacts Helen Cregger Patrick Ford Matthew Jones Moody's Rating Issue 212-553-4559 415-274-1739 415-274-1735 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A Sale Amount $3,345,000 Expected Sale Date 07/29/02 Rating Description General Obligation Bonds Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 20028 Sale Amount $5,660,000 Expected Sale Date 07/26/02 Rating Description Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Rating Aa3 Al MOODY'S ASSIGNS A Aa3 RATING TO THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO'S GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2002A AND AN Al RATING TO THE SALES TAX REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 20026 THE Aa3 RATING AFFECTS $4.52M IN OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT, AND THE Al RATING AFFECTS $18.79M IN OUTSTANDING SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS Opinion Moody's Investors Service has assigned an initial Aa3 underlying rating to the Town of Vail, Colorado's $3.345 million General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A, and an initial Al underlying rating to $5.66 million Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 20028. The Aa3 general obligation bond rating affects $4.52 million of outstanding debt, post refunding, and the Al rating affects $18.79 million in outstanding sales tax revenue bonds. The ratings reflect consistent financial results driven by conservative fiscal management and stable reserve levels despite historically modest sales tax growth and recent declines in this critical revenue source. The city's well-established, tourism-based economy has generally demonstrated steady growth in taxable and full property values, which along with moderate borrowing, has supported the town's low debt burden. The Al rating on the Sales Tax Revenue bonds, secured by proceeds of the city's 4.0% sales tax, reflects strong coverage of maximum annual debt service by pledged revenues, adequate legal provisions, and the strength and stability of the town's resort economy. The Series 2002A will refund outstanding general obligation debt for an estimated net present value savings of $95,000 (3.0% of refunding par), and the Series 20028 will refund outstanding sales tax bonds for an expected net present value savings of $350,000 (6.6% of refunded par.) Both issues are expected to be insured by MBIA, and upon satisfactory review of the insurance policy, are expected to carry the Aaa rating reflecting the financial strength of the guarantor. The underlying ratings will continue to be maintained. CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RESULTS DESPITE MODEST SALES TAX GROWTH. Conservative fiscal practices characterized by cautious budgeting have produced consistently strong financial results. Over the past five years, ending General Fund balances have averaged just over 27%. A year-end General Fund balance of $6.3 million (30.1%) for fiscal 2001 remains in line with both historical trends and the town's policy of maintaining reserves of at least 25% of the following year's anticipated revenues. Despite an anticipated drawdown of $60,000 in fiscal 2002, resulting from declines in sales tax revenue, Moody's expects overall financial operations to remain stable. Maintenance of adequate reserve levels remains critical for the town, given its relatively high dependence on sales tax revenue, which accounts for close to 40% of the town's operating budget. Over the past ten years, sales tax revenue growth has averaged 3.4% annually, with especially strong annual increases of over 6% during the late 1990s. More recently, however, sales tax collections have declined by 4.4% year-to-date, reflecting a slowed state and national economy, the events of September 11, 2001, and a late snowfall. While significant, this decline compares favorably with a 10% reduction in sales tax revenue that the town included in an amended budget approved in the wake of 9/11. Sales tax revenue dropped especially sharply immediately following this event with year-to-year declines of 10.0%, 14.4% and 22.8% in September, October and November, respectively. Since that period, collections have recovered slightly, although state forest fires during June, while not directly threatening the town, have continued to dampen local tourism, and Moody's expects only modest growth in the near term. The town collects approximately 70% of its sales tax revenue during the five winter ski months (mid November -mid April) although the town continues marketing efforts to attract visitors year-round, an important initiative in maintaining financial flexibility. The town also received voter approval in 2000 to permanently retain revenues over and above TABOR limits. AMPLE COVERAGE OF SALES TAX BONDS WITH ADEQUATE LEGAL PROTECTIONS. Moody's anticipates that coverage of maximum annual debt service (MADS) by the town's pledged first lien on its 4.0% sales tax will remain ample. Over the past five years, coverage of MADS by pledged revenues has averaged a strong 6.48 times, although excess revenues also fund town operations. The top ten generators of sales tax revenue are also fairly concentrated at around 31 %. Adequate bondholder protections include a debt service reserve equal to the least of 10% of outstanding principal plus investment earnings or maximum annual debt service. Further security is provided by an additional bonds test that requires 1.50 times coverage of debt service requirements for 12 preceding months. STABLE ECONOMY SUPPORTED BY STRONG REPUTATION AND APPEAL OF RESORT AREA. Approximately 100 miles west of Denver, the town of Vail is located within the Rocky Mountains at the base of Vail Ski Resort, encompassing roughly five square miles. The ski resort was founded in 1962, and is owned by Vail Resorts, Inc., (Senior Implied Rating Ba3 by Moody's) which represents the town's largest employer with over 10,000 employees during the ski season. Vail is the single largest ski area in North America, and industry experts consistently rank the resort among the top five in North America. While annual skier visits have demonstrated fluctuations over the past five years, visits to the Vail and Beaver Creek ski areas has increased slightly from 18.9% of statewide visits in 1997-1998 to 19.7% in 2001-2002, reflecting both additional visits resulting from multi-jurisdictional ski passes as well as declines in fly-in visitors to resorts such as Aspen following 9/11. The resort continues to add skiable acres and is anticipating approximately $600 million in private investment over the next three to five years. The town's permanent population has increased 22% over the past decade to a modest 4,531. This figure swells to a peak daily winter population of approximately 30,000. The town's estimated full market valuation has increased an average of 6.8% annually over the past five years, reflecting biannual reassessment of existing property values as well as continuing development of seasonal housing and commercial properties. Moody's expects future new real estate development to remain constrained by the lack of available land and developmental emphasis in other areas such as Bachelor Gulch Village in Beaver Creek. Full value per capita is extremely high at $1.1 million, and median home values, according to the 2000 census, equal $575,000. The Town of Vail relies primarily on the ski industry, and as such remain vulnerable to weather and other economic fluctuations. Nevertheless, county unemployment is moderate at 3.6% (04/02) and remains below state and national figures, although employment remains highly cyclical and declines significantly during the summer months. MODEST DEBT BURDEN WITH NO SIGNIFICANT FUTURE BORROWING. The town's debt burden remains modest at 1.4%, and debt retirement is rapid, with all general obligation debt repaid within four years, and sales tax revenue bonds fully repaid within eleven. The town does not have any general obligation debt authorizations and plans to fund future capital needs largely through tax increment financing and on a pay-as-you-go basis. The town's current capital program, which totals $13.6 million for 2002, will be paid from operating revenues and includes $2.6 million for construction of the Donovan Park Pavilion, an indoor community pavilion that is expected to open in July 2003. The town intends to delay or cancel capital projects as necessary should sales tax revenues decline further. Moody's anticipates that the city's debt will remain very manageable, given the expectation that future issuance will be minimal. KEY STATISTICS: Population: 4,531 2002 Full market valuation: $4.78 billion Full value per capita: $1.1 million' Debt burden: 1.4% Payout of principal (GO Debt): 100% in 4 years Payout of principal (Sales Tax Debt): 100% in 11 years Fiscal 2001 General Fund balance: $6.29 million (30.1 %) Unemployment, Eagle County (04/02): 3.6% Peak sales tax debt service coverage (2001 revenues): 6.77 times Outlook The town's stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that its financial position will remain strong, providing adequate flexibility against fluctuations in sales tax revenue related to ski or other tourism based activities. In addition, Moody's believes that Vail's affluent base will continue to yield modest increases in taxable values, allowing it to maintain low debt levels. ©Copyright 2002 by Moody's Investors Service, 99 Church Street, New York, NY 10007. All rights reserved. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS COPYRIGHTED IN THE NAME OF MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MOODY'S"), AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind and MOODY'S, in particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied; as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness. merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any such information. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors. officers.. employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis. interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The credit ratings, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment decision made by or on behalf of any user of the information contained herein, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and each provider of credit support for, each security that it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. Pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, MOODY'S hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY'S have. prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MOODY'S for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from 51,000 to S1,500,000. MADE IN U.S.A ~~~ ~~~~ ~,,, L" ~' ~a'^'` ~~ ~i~ ~.?- www.taproomvail.com www. sanctuaryvail. com r ~._ `,Kith Style [~,~!:ir_ & Events u`-, ,t a u~~~ Cuisine r.,,, Venues Steven E. Kaufman ~ °'~_,Location ~ ,~ N C T U~ R Y (970) 479-0500 x4 1 1~~ '.'ista Bahn Fax: (970) 477-1393 .~,~~.:i:i_ain views Steve@taproomvail.com ~C~ ,37G-3•ZGG 333 Bridge Street Vail Coloxado 81657 PETITION TO: VAIL CHAMBER BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: We, the undersigned business managers and/or owners, hereby state our objection to the continuance of the Board's Friday Block Party, due to the program's negative effect on our businesses: ~~~ ~Ncoe~,~,gs ~ ~~~,~-T F,~,~~ .~tvsi~- AN,O ~NT~J~T~~''1/n~'~I Cd~uT~yr/~5 f}%" ljNY j~rLi» No. Signature Date Business Title xc: Vail Daily Vail Town Council Coors KTUN PETITION TO: VAIL CHAMBER BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: We, the undersigned business managers and/or owners, hereby state our objection to the continuance of the Board's Friday Block Party, due to the pro ram's negative effect on our businesses: tU,~ fitl~oc~,~A6 ~ ~/fi~T `~~~ ~yivs~~ ~{ N ~NT~~,~Ti~ ~I~'I ~~T Gn~uT"+~~/,r~ y /~ % /~/~ Y % ~ryi~ No. Signature Date Business Title xc: Vail Daily Vail Town Council Coors KTUN ~ .,, `~t. ~ ~~ ~~ ~. rui-co-uc ur:ooam Prom-Vail Chamber & Business Association T-185 P.001/002 F-601 ~t~PY T~ailSpecial ~vertt Guideliries* 1. Sponsors not selling or giving away product within the core of the Village, Lionshead or at the base of the Vista Bahr will not be subject to approval by the VCBA. 2. The Special Events Permit Process will include the following questions: - Does the Event Promoter hold the merchandise rights to the event? If not, who does? - Will the merchandise product be offered to local merchants? If so, merchaztdise shall be sold at a minimum of keystone throughout the entirety of the event. 3. Merchants and promoters will agree to specific locations for booths to be set up in the Village core and Lionshead areas. These locations will be utilized similarly to the curre~ plan for car placements. A booth map, including dimensions and heights, will be a part of the Special Events permit that each promoter shall complete. Placement of all objects (to include tents, displays, booths, vehicles, etc.) shall not block existing merchant pedestrian access or abut display windows. 4. Locations for stage set ups will be studied and approved by the Town of Vail, VCBA and event promoters in conjunction with the Special Event Process review, 5. Sponsors/Evera promoters may sell or give-a-way a product only w;th the pemnission of the Town of Vail. The Town shall notify the VCHA of the pending application to sell or _give-a-way any product affecting the Special Product Merchants. The intent is to eliminate the potential for hit and run vendors disguised as small dollar sponsors. The -VCBA will be responsible for contacting the affected parties and facilitating a solution, if one is required. If a solution cannot be reached, the affected merchant has the right to appeal to the Vail Town Council through the VCBA. The Event promoter or sponsor must receive a 6 -1 vote of council support to proceed after an appeal has been filed. This vote may be exercised by proxy at the council level. r~ ~'~f`. specific Product Merchants are businesses which are dependant on the sale of one type of ~ profit for a majority of their gross sales. Sponsots/Event proxx-oters may not sell or give away product that impacts Specific Product Merchants wiWout the expressed permission of the impacted business. Product give-~a-ways shall be provided in sample size portions unless otherwise agreed upon with the Specific Product Merchant. Sample size portions -for beverages must be no more than 4oz and served in no larger than a 4oz cogtainer unless q><ltetwise agreed upon with the Specific Product Merchant. Examples of items which represent the Specific Product Merchant, include eyewear, ice cream, coffee and t shirts {vfnth the exception of event t shirts). This list will be reviewed at the end of 2002 unless otherwise agreed to by the VCBA, Town of Vail and special event promoters. 7. Special events promoters will be required bo have refuse removal accomplished before the~begiaaming of business of the day following the event. Vendor pickup attd drop off shell be tracomplished to confornn with existing trafSc regulations, Vendors must comply with operating during the full hours of the event. Set up and tear down must be completed within that framework. Jul-26-02 OA:55am From-flail Chamber 6 Business Association T-1A6 P.002/002 F-601 8. Temporary outside vendors will never be allowed in Vail outside of a Special Evelxt, Street Artisan, Street Entertainers or Transient Vendor permit. 9. We support the hiring of Special Events Coordinator by the Town of Vail to ensure event compliance with the fawn's restrictions during the entire permitted event, from set up through clean up, including the collection of TOV sales tax. It is unfair to expect individual merchants to act as impromptu Code Enforcement OtTicers when event participants block doors with exhibits, set uP larger displays than agreed, ar in places other than agreed, fail to enforce limits on liquor licenses, or abandon event refuse for days after the event is over. 10. The long term solution and ultimate goal of all interested parties relating to Special Events is the development of a permanem area for events to occur, including staging and expo areas at the base of the Vista Bahr in Vail Village or Gondola in Lionshead. 11. While these guidelines have been agreed to by the signing parties, they are by no means limited to governing only these parties' activities. As other event promoters make application to the Town of Vail, they too, will be subject to these guidelines. Kaye Ferry D~ Vail Chamber & Business Association Scott McCormick xigliline Sports 8t Entertainment Date Ceil Foltz Date Vail Valley Foundation 7oe1 Health Date Vail Valley Towrism ~ Convention Bureau *Ansended d/Zd/Z001 to include Transie~u Yendor Per-rrits in Sedfon 8. TOWN COUNCIL PACKET . AUGUST 6, 2002 Prepared by Wenk Associates ei! villa e STREETSCAPE DESIGN ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN Table of Contents Design objectives and givens 3 Summary of comments from Public Workshop on June 26-28, 2002 4 Proposed activity and circulation diagram presented July 11, 2002 6 " Snowmelt feasibility review 7 Design matrix 17 2 ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN The following design objectives and givens were approved by Town Council on June 18, 2002. Design Objectives • Establish a level of quality consistent with Vail's Vision "to be the premiere mountain resort community". • Respect the community's sensitive alpine setting. • Create a vibrant pedestrian village which encourages day and evening activity. • Support year-round economic pertormance of retail, restaurant, and lodging. • Improve pedestrian wayfinding. - • Consider compatible adjacent uses for guests, businesses, and residents. • Address operation and maintenance considerations. • Involve the community members who will be affected by the plan so that the final product respects their need and goals. Givens • The project will follow goals established by the 1991 Streetscape Master Plan • Plans will be grounded in community input • The design team will consider all ideas for improvements and will communicate how suggestions are used • The design will be from building face to building face • Snowmelt will be investigated and decided upon early in the process • Public art will be integrated into the design • Phasing plans will be coordinated, minimize impact, and make sense • The plan will be constructible and developed in phased packages to minimize impacts on the Village during the July -August peak summer season • Plans will include a base plan, which will meet the needs of the budget • The first phase of construction will commence in spring of 2003 • Safety and public welfare will not be jeopardized • Town Council is the final decision-maker 3 ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN Summary of comments from Public Workshop on June 26-28, 2002 Points of Consensus: • Village streets look tired and need upgrading • Physical improvements will not solve all the retail problems . • Do not "mall" the village core; do not make the village look like Beaver Creek • Greater intensity of activity in the streets is desired • An extended pedestrian/retail experience is desired • "Softer" street activities are preferred over larger events • Some existing plazas are not as functional as they could be • Multi-functionality of streets and plazas should be maximized to provide more venues • Need more places /things that appeal to children • Need signage that provides better direction to stores • Improvement in trash pick-up and service /delivery systems would be desirable if feasible • Unique qualities, hand-crafted nature, and scale of the Village Issues needing further discussion: • Snowmelt pros and cons • Priorities for improvement -how to decide where to start? • Differentiation of "districts" within the village core vs. consistent themes • Character and use of key public spaces (Children's Fountain Plaza, Founders' Plaza) Areas of disagreement: • Snowmelt: aesthetics, costs • Events and street activities: target market, size, venue, noise Ideas that generated excitement: • History walk • "Green" technology and energy efficiency for snowmelt and lighting 4 • Public art • Special lighting to define landmarks and public spaces • Street chessboards • Integrated bike /ski / snowboard parking locations - • Banner poles • Public information kiosks and district directory signs . • More outdoor dining opportunities Temporarily Parked issues: • Opportunities for public /private cooperation • Funding mechanisms (BID, TIF, Town of Vail capital budget) • Visual /physical connection with other commercial areas (Crossroads, WI, Meadow Drive) • Continuity of design elements /theme throughout village • Designated occupancy levels for plazas and pedestrian areas during events • Parked issues that will be addressed at a future time: • Revision of Town of Vail sign code and lighting standards in the core • Programming for special-events • Possibility of incentives for private development • Funding mechanisms (BID, TIF, Town of Vail capital budget) • Conference center • Private design assistance for retailers (lighting, storefront design, signage) • Commercial /retail environment (retail mix, landlord /tenant relations) • Coordination with development of event venues elsewhere in Vail • Streamwalk from Covered Bridge to Willow Bridge • Revised delivery and trash service alternatives for the Village core 5 CHILDREN'S FOUNTAIN BRIDGE STREET _ _ ` - - - „any =:'rr^a n-I r.rd u[rnOrJ _ -- ~ • -i,.nltiLauc,l<:.Pr. .. __ • 'r .r-..;~;n.=,: •,~noi~rrsllnrrac • LL Fr=i:'TS - _ _ • y'1~-',•LA:L f't1,•L~+INI+..J ll~;il:i GORE CREEK PROMENADE ' ~^ ^ ~ • Ir.rtR0.CTr,E __ • ~NTlra;; en`.,+EP, ;EasorlaL • -r, ~~, F '~ '•.I '~r';x,-F ~ - ~"•-Rv P SSft{31 1~5 • PJ6l IC, •`.FT - -- - - _ r>FmP Tn .rJ . • PE'JP E :^/A-:'-1IfiG -.- _ - _ _ I _ _. • r. .TCCTEO ,... _~ LPG J_F. • P I' ! rrlFkl I ,: • P EI• CniJtJE TIUf-1 _- ~ - _ i • f pva 'F ; SIBS 17 ,3=5=P.PRT CIP CIE • iC'iIL~U .ran(1. f :LIE ~ • H1H+-,~PJC'i oEP if EaCC ~; ' ~-- -- - - • RtFf ,fla_~ ~,EP ~k.p ACCESS rPC: ul•M1~1F{. n P iTI F". •- ~ -~ --- _ - ~.- .-. • u( F_l 7l N'J l,L nLT 7T f` r+., .: - 7 "~ ~ - ~ VILLAGE PARKING . . ,.. ~ ,: =y , ` -. i = _ -:~- STRUc=TURF"` _ - _ . I '' - _ = GORE CREEK DRIVE EAST GORE CREEK DRIVE WEST - ` ': ai I.I-t . 'I ~z-M~ ~ .. - _ - -- -- - . FEI _., ._ PE '. ice! CP :4 EiT • rt a TRI 1 f nIJ~ ncrJ r~ • f CC C' P. rr ( L LOT.„iPCJ `,. ~ .1 ~'.7- `~,~ -' ~ _ - ~ _ - kt L r~l l _ • » • I L~ ~P V 1 . vR 4~Trvr IT-T • i 1ALL l Ib1E F E`.F T.. • PP "`TFr Tr-E' J f rf R ...<:f '1 •. I -- 1 I ~,T/w ~~ i,..,p ,.~-~ .. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ Y --. _ - - El PH.i~MILL CR. EY B?IU~ -PIG R • r CIJ~ ~ . SCR`.ICL ~1-CE`5 ' ' ~ ` . • I IF P:. i SFi(~X'E ArrC51 :;, ' - ~ ~. _ r' - r ~ sir ' d - ` ' - ..., ., , ..a ..;, ,h,. s -~ -. ` ~ , ' .. ~, a ,.' t . ~ om,. ~ _ _ ~ r r"^° ! .,.~ .. ~` _ Rp 1 ' ~ ~ I -F CR~~~ - WEST GORE CREEK PLAZA ~ - °- ' :.- ' ~ "-- t `"~ - ~ P3&J DEVELOPMENT (CHECKPOINT CHARLIE) :. : • ~ ,r .. '. ~ .v"' • I I • <.. ~f '..:,_..F. t' I f':..I P ~ ~. I' ~I': ,~" ', i;, _ _.. _ .. --. . - ', '.,., -- L, ^JG.cJ.P~ P:\P. •. ` T _ - r ..'• -Ea. ~,r E~ • r t~C RAL VUw.Ept `Ti6LE - ~ ~'" ~ - ~ ., .- -, ~,..~:"` _ - • f SCP • di Fn..:a PECESTP I?faT nt 'IE +P • r . ~P 1 CNT nI, SET (i',I•f ~ ~ i- ~ , J CTK JS • iEv 4',If LCIiPLir[ ~- •r _ I -. ` -, I~,~R ' r _ .. S » r ~ ' . I ` ~~~ .-~° ` I l ~ ' ' SFIBFRT CIRCLE WALL STREET >,~ ~ .. ~ ~ • _~~~ +.L 5Pn% E • err- "Inr r1rJE,?!ar`I racc6RS ^-- / ~ - _ - - • L 3.nl.rwR • 1 Tni r Fr' F KI ETS J _ - -._ ~ -•-.••,o..e-_ ` .'cr`... .»~. ...-.~.d-.. ~ ~ • t E- I~ • r -.- P J~JITf_~ E - y l c . _ - • A.l UJ'la~r: _ • 1 P - 1 '. -. F' Tt~TAIIV I-IFIJT - ~ '^~ 3 3 ' r ~ I - - - - ~ I rJ ~ • S -elt MUSIC A+J{i 0.81 • T =Y'; ta' c r z~~, ~ ~ t - ~ t i - -. .. -._._ - ~ I • T E:,•1PPQF. UI•J 1TIE: • RH tl-1- >S tJf EJR III FIPF • R. TP -f t Vr~74Ii,JEf. P~ ~''- ~ // `~ -..:.. ' r ~ ~~-~ ~ • fA • ~ l~~k . • fl iC4~Et~IC ~ SEA +IGE A E i •. ~~ / r , ~ _ ~ - . i ' '' ~ Fr Il.aPyGlulla; fo+, EARL EATON PLAZA ~ - ~ I T I. , I- R ~ 7 ~~~~ ...-.~r d.~f, r~< '~", • I•`~` TP r :n` • - ~ ~~ VAIL FRONT DOOR PROJECT - - GCLDEN ~ Il , r R w E f E • LJ•rJG cAPEU ~ • rr T +l r F ~ - „_,.~,-f _ ~ ~ P;,=AID I.1I'C~rYi irk: • r'Y ;f(]4FPY PIAY AR FA I ' - • P ,E F F 1T1 ~' ' - • ;'!~: Y N-1T.4~TIOII • L,.PL" I ~l •~_Tl` Irl.', ~ • • SctiTlll CPariRT tT Ei • frF~l Ilan t. r'.. , ~ ~~ail village PROPOSED ACTIVITY PROGRAMMING DIAGRAM ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN snowmelt Feasibility Review I. General The objective of this report is to discuss the feasibility of installing a mechanical snowmelt system in conjunction with the proposed deep utility upgrade and streetscape remodel. The principal areas reviewed include (please refer to the locations indicated on the attached graphics for more information): Zone 1 -consists of Bridge Street from the Covered Bridge to Seibert Circle. Zone 2 -consists of Earl Eaton Plaza, Wall Street, Children's Fountain plaza, and the stairs on the east end of Gore Creek Promenade. Zone 3 -consists of the section of Gore Creek Drive between the west edge of the Children's Fountain Plaza up to and including Checkpoint Charlie, the section of Gore Creek Drive between Mill Creek and Bridge Street, and Hanson Ranch Road between Seibert Circle and Mill Creek. Zone 4 -consists of Gore Creek Promenade and the section of Willow Bridge Road between the south end of the bridge and Checkpoint Charlie. Zone 5 -consists of the section of Hanson Ranch Road between Mill Creek and the chute, the chute, and the section of Gore Creek Drive between Mill Creek and the chute. Current snowmelt in these areas is limited to a few private property installations around building perimeters. II. Advantages A. Reduces need for plowing resulting in: 1. Noise reduction. 2. Reduced snow removal cost. 3. Reduced interface between pedestrians and heavy equipment. 4. Minimized conflicts between snowplows and delivery trucks. 5. Reduced physical damage to streetscape and structures. 6. Reduced exhaust from diesel trucks used in snow removal. 7. Increased ability to keep street furniture out year round. B. Safer more consistent walking surface. C. Reduces need for hand shoveling. D. Increased visibility of paving surface. E. Reduced need for sand and cinders resulting in: 1. Less tracking of sand and cinders into businesses. 2. Reduces material/maintenance cost. 7 F. Reduced need for chemical de-icing. G. Reduction in worker's compensation claims. III. Disadvantages A. Initial capital cost (refer to attached graphic for estimated costs). B. Perpetual utility cost (refer to attached graphic for estimated costs). C. Possible reduction of snow country character. D. Environmental impacts including: 1. Increased fossil fuel usage. 2. Products of combustion expelled from boilers. E. Potential for snowmelt system failure requiring traditional snow removal. F. Exhaust steam "plume" while boilers are operating. G. More frequent winter cleaning would be necessary.. IV. System Options and Considerations A. General Several different types of snowmelt systems were reviewed including: gas-fired boilers with buried hydronic tubing, buried electric cables, gas infrared heating, electric infrared heating, and a solar heated system with buried hydronic tubing. We found agas-fired boiler system with buried hydronic tubing to be the best solution because it is relatively easy to install, has a comparatively low operating cost, is proven reliable, and provides a uniform melting pattern. Following is a brief discussion of the major system components and considerations associated with agas-fired boiler system with buried hydronic tubing. B. Boiler Plant We have reviewed the following locations as potential boiler plant locations: the area to the northwest of the International Bridge, a vault buried below Checkpoint Charlie, and the area south of the Village Parking Structure. Expanding the existing boiler room on the north side of level 2 in the Village parking structure may be another potential solution if the area to be snowmelted is limited to a relatively small area (Bridge Street for example). Another potential solution is to locate the boiler plant within the future "Front Door' development. Since the boiler room must be large enough to house the system's boilers, pumps, controls, etc., the estimated boiler room size will be a big factor in determining the best location. The estimated boiler room size ranges from 20 square feet (to accommodate the smallest single zone) to 1,000 square. feet (to accommodate the combined area of all five zones). Another significant factor in determining the best boiler room location is the proximity to the snowmelted area. If snowmelt is a consideration for the East Meadow Drive streetscape remodel, the area northwest of the International Bridge may be the best option because it is fairly centrally located. C. Heat Distribution Main distribution piping would be buried below the street to carry heating water solution (50% water and 50% propylene glycol) to serpentine tubing located under the streetscape. Potential tubing configurations include installing the tubing in a sand or pea gravel layer under the finished paving material, embedding the tubing in concrete under the finished paving material, or embedding the tubing directly in the finished paving material. Any of these options, or a combination of these options, is feasible depending on the finished paving material. The option that may have the most.merit is to locate the tubing in a sand or pea gravel layer below the finished paving material. This option would allow the tubing to be temporarily moved allowing flexibility for future road construction and minimizing the risk of damaging the tubing while accessing buried utilities. D. Environmental Considerations Natural gas is one of the cleanest burning fossil fuels. However, there are some environmental impacts to consider. Natural gas burns much cleaner than the gasoline and diesel fuel burned by the loaders and other trucks used in traditional snowmelt removal. Since natural gas is primarily composed of methane, the principal by-products produced when it is burned are carbon dioxide and water vapor along with very small amounts of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a "greenhouse" gas and is thought to contribute to global warming. Nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide emissions contribute to the formation of "acid rain". H. Phasing Considerations The snowmelt system installation can be phased to progress with the utility and streetscape upgrades. Also, because the cost of the boiler plant will likely be about 30% of the total cost of the snowmelt system, construction of the boiler plant could be postponed to the end of the project to reduce capital costs at the beginning of the project. snowmelt Feasibility Review prepared by Beaudin Ganze Consulting Engineers VAIL VILLAGE STREETSCAPE DESIGN SNOWMELT COST ESTIMATE DATA FOR VARIOUS ZONES APPROXIMATE AREA (S.F.) ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE COST WITH SNOWMELT SYSTEM ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE COST WITHOUT SNOWMELT SYSTEM ESTIMATED SNOW MELT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COST SUGGESTED ESTIMATED SNOWMELT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COST RANGE ESTIMATED SNOWMELT SYSTEM UTILITY COST AND MAINTENANCE COST ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 3 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 TOTALS 13,500 27,500 21,500 10,500 17,000 90,000 $8,775 $17,875 $13,975 $6,825 $11,050 $58,500 $25,100 $50,025 $23,350 $20,250 $21,550 $140,275 $337,500 $687,500 $537,500 $262,500 $425,000 $2,250,000 300K-400K 650K-750K 500K-600K 250K-350K 400K-500K 2100K-2600K $13,500 $27,500 $21,500 $10,500 $17,000 $90,000 NOTES: 1-ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE COSTS WITH SNOWMELT SYSTEM INCLUDE CLEANING, HAND AND MECHANICAL SWEEPING (THESE TASKS ARE NOT NEEDED IF STREETSCAPE IS PLOWED 2-ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITHOUT SNOW MELT SYSTEM INCLUDE PLOWING, SHOVELING, HAULING, SANDING, DAMAGE REPAIR, PLOW FUEL, PLOW MAINTENANCE, CLEANING AND SWEEPING (5 PER GREG HALL ON 8/1/02) 3-ESTIMATED SNOWMELT SYSTEM UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE NATURAL GAS, POWER, AND STANDARD SYSTEM EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES 4-ESTIMATED UTILITY COSTS ARE BASED ON NOVEMBER 2001-MARCH 2002 NATURAL GAS PRICE OF 50.45 PER THERM NON-SNOWMELT CONFIGURATION • TC `~AL PROJECT P.REA 90.000 S.F_ • AP,CAwr tn,IrWMEIT ~ OS.F. • AREA w:b SNObO'PffLT ~ 90,000 S.F • TOTAC tNSTALLATIOV COST ~ $ 0 • T07AL YEARL'( OPEi~4TION COS i S - $140.275 • $N•.- ~+~~tT `_Y$TEM CTii1T i ! MAINENANCE COST $ 0 • SV,:~1^;F1E:TED WIM~~:f, ~~AaII MAINTENANCE COST $ 0 • N~:'~ANO/~M=LTEf1 WINTCR STREET MAINTENANCE lC1ST $ 140,275 ~~ ~ -~ =-- - L L _ ~ _. i :~ i - __ ~~ i ~5L EER • ADVANTAGES MAINTAIN SNOW REMO'1kL ;'ATs ~.1LY` • PREDIC T A8L'c 'Y~AVL`41SA1SCE 7'uT:iJTY COST • MAINTAIN SNOW COUNTRY CHARACTER • NO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACS FROM SNO WPIECT SOtCERS • NO 8ACKUP SNOW REMOVAL SYSTEM REQUIRED • NO ADDIT76NAL CAA1TAi CL•li' • NO ADDITIONAL WINTER ?Ni FFNNG NFC'>~ii.RY • DISADVANTAGES_ • Ct't5 'NOT A:%Ci4.cSS I".UES RELATED TO PLOWING: , Fw ~_ "~~* "~`°F ~, .,~.d a ,'1 ~P. ~ ,~ ~ r ~ • cNOW REMOVAL COST ° • 1I 1 ~,~ 1 $„ _ „ . r'O W S hN - EAVY El` MENT ie<a k '~ /~' ~ LINtL I BEIW~Eh ~IOWPLC7 NAND DELIVERY IRUCK$ .~ _ FFkY C t DA.`t.~GE Tf'STRFFTSCAPF AI i 5 4tlf'I 1R FS ~, _, ~ ~~ ~.; ~ F K~-NUS FAI_~>`I DIESEL TRUCKS USED IN SNptM! REMOVAL ' - ~cET t., erdn JRC REMOVCn DUP~^ ; $Nr~t, ;[A:ON h ~ • POTf P:fIALLY UNSAFE WAL:iNG 3i;RFA~~i: '' r ~f' ~ • HANv_N7VELING REQUIRED ' r~ ~ + °~' ~ 1 ~.'~~ ryr~ ~ • PAVING SI.RFACE CIRSCURRED _- - ~ / , COkF CR K ~ • =r'?ND FND CIN DERG REQUIRE6 R TRACTION - / ~ /t _ ~ L ~ FE • T~LQ'YIVG TNT 1 R td '. ES •., t L ~. a ~ ~,* CHILDREN S J~ ~ k - ~ • MATE RIAI r MAIN TFNFryCF ~ -" .I j ,it - - - ~~xa~ I' FOl1NTAY1. - 'h~. ?~s+r. € • CHEMICAL DE-ICING SI ILL UStU FOR TRACTION _,~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ PLXc7A ~ pc~5o~ ~ ~- ~,~ ~ , `/ SE48ERF ~ \ CIRCLE ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~l ~ ~ ~ _. ~~ _O~~ I kl,~ ~~ 1..~ ~. f _- ( ----- ~,.~~ I1 ~_~ I ~ >~ - ~ I ~~ I GOLDEN PEAK ~ I i r-~ ~' a ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT -NONE SNOWMELT ZONE #I ~ • ADVANTAGES • Tt i 1 AL PRO~EC.~ cRGa - 90,000 S.f. - L • REDUCE$ NEED FOR PLOWING RF_SULTf?SC~ £?S • AREA w. Snit f~NM'=LT - 13,soo s.F. ~ ~ NOIg acpi tCTION • AREA wio SNOW MELT - 76 500 S.F. I - _ ~ ~ • REDUCED SNOW REMOVAL COST , _ - '- ,--_ ,-__ ~ • REDUCED INTERFACE BETWEEN PEDESTRI/YV AND iifh`lY Ef~.YA?kE91T • TOTAL INSTALLAI !()J COST - $30A,000 - 400.000 ~ ~ -- • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEEN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRUCKS - `,_ • REDl1~T ED PHYS/<-.A/_ OAMA~,,E TO ST?F,F_TS/..APF_ AN4 STRl1r'-F(/RJ:S • TOTAL YEAKLI OPtK4TION CO$I$ - $137,450 __ ~ • RCDUCCD CXI IA UST FROM t%~~lSCL TRUCKS USCD IN SNOW RCMOVAL • SN~.'NrtcLT WSIFM U'~ILUY~MAINENANCF CUSI y Ij,SVU _ r~ • INCREASED ABILITY TO KEL;';TP.EET `l1RNITU0.E Ol1T YEAR ROl1ND N T1'W MFI. t.l WI ,';4R C~a.Fti ri.;nJiENANCC COST ~ d 8,:;3 _ -1 - - • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WALI.1h C, SURFACE I ~F!: N!T roM LTEL~ `~MNTtR STREET MAINTENaN CE r~_.c? - $ 173, 173 --- ~ -~ ~ ~' • RF nI1C'FS NFFF) F(~R HANCJ SH C7VF~ IV C; :.,a ^\ ~ ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #1 ~ ~ SNOWMELT CONFIGURATION #2 • TC I AL PROJECT kREA - 90,000 S.l:_ ' - AREA,,, SP CWMFLT - 41,000 SF. - ~~~ -~-~ - • AR'ch wru 7 ff.'4~_`: - 49,000 Sf. ~ ~ ~ - ---J _ • TOTAL INSTALLATION COST - $950,DQ0- 7J30,0'DO _ ~ _ __ -- ~ • TOTAL YtARt_* OPERATION COSIS - $132,800 ! ) ~ -- ~ • SN,~..:~+,_ i `YSTEM U ~ IiiTF ~ MAINE NANCE COST - S J 1,000 ~j - -_ -__ - • SNO'~A''P'Et. i'El1 WI"1T4R STREET MAINTENANCE COST j 24,450 _ ~ - ( - - ~ i • Nc'~+,:<,^~n'!,N`-fLTEn v/:n TFR iTREET MAIMENANCE fnc' $ 6j, t;Q _ -~ _ ___ _. '' =° ~l ~=°" + ... - _. &{PER ' _ s , ~ V ~. ''PL~ZA ^ ~ ~~ I _ ~ • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR F'I.OWtNG RESULTITJG lt1 • NOISE R[DUCTION • REDUCED ,1/.`l04 AE'i7C'aX. CL`l3 • REDUCED INTERFACE 6fTLVfbVr'YDESTRLOY AiV0 Hfi4L9'F~YGOFfV'T • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEEN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRUCKS • REDUi:ED PHYSICAL DAMAGE TO STREE TSCAi'E AND STRUCTURES • RFDUI_rD FX HAUST FRVM Fii'SFI TR UCKS USED IN SNVW RFMVVAI • INCREASED ABILITY TO KELP yraccr cURNIn IRC OUT YEAR ROUND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WAL;{!NG SLt;FACE • REDUCES NEED FOR HAND SHOVtI ~VG • INCREASED VISIBILITY OF PAVING ~. IRFACE • RED:iCEG NEED FOR SAND ANU CINDERS 2ESULTING IN: • LESS TRACKING WTO $i157N1E5SE< • REDUCES MATERIAL ~ MAINT[NAN~ C COSTS • FEDOCED 'vF iD FOR. CI!E11CAl. UbICINC • DISAD'/ANTAGES • INITIAL CAPITAL wST • UTILITY':=OS'V.ARMBlLITY • POS~IRI_>_ ~FnUCTION OF SNOW COUNTRY ~i{A2ACTER • ENVIHONMLNTAL IMPACTS INCLUDING. • IN%:TEh;EU FOSSIL FOAL USAGE • COMF;U+J VJN GAScS FROM SNOWMf LT BOILER] • PGTLNTIAL FOR SNOWNE_T SYSFEM FAILURE REQUIRING T^.AC:;-; ZONAL SNOW RED Fv ~ 4L • Exl-AI 1ST "PLUME" WHIZ F ROt_ERS ARE OPFP ATING • P?OkP FREQUENT WINTFG4 CLEANING W(NII '~ BE NECESSARY - ;~' , ~ ~,~ ~~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ ._~ _o 1 r \~ _ /-~' GOLDEN PEAK VI - . ~~ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #2 ~ ~ ~ SNOWMEI T ZONE #3 • TOTAL PROTECT AREA 90,000 S.F_ ~' L-~- • AREA w' SNOn'MEL` ~ 62,500 S.F -_ ~~~ __ • AREA w;o SNOWMEL7 ~ 27,500 S,F. '- '-- ~ _ • TOTAL INSTALLATILN COST - $1,450.OOD - 1,750,000 `~ - • TOTAL Ira Ki (OFF'r ATION CUSIS - $144.92$ ~~ ~ ' - • S-VOWi-:fiT 1YSTtM.;TUTi MAINENANCE COST - $ 62,500 ~~- ~ ~ - -_ _ ;,.,.. ^:C.7`rt ... ,f; ;*a,c~-7 MAINTENANCE COST $ 40,L2.' i ~-~ , -- - -.- , • NC:n,tNOWNC1 FTn WINTER STREET MAINTENAVCE~ ~1ti $ 4f,80C - ~~L ~~/ ~i ~~ ,~ ~~ \. ~I~ • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR PLOWING RE$iJLTi7SG iN. • NOISC REDUCTION • REDUCED SivCIId ALiY,7`dRi CJT • REDUCED INTERFACE 6ETiVfBV FL'OESTRfAh' ANY7 i+'&S49' ft'A~W'FkNT • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BCTWEEN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRl/CK5 • REUUCEU PHYSICAL UAMA ,E IO SI RrEISi.APE ANU SI RL1C Il1RE5 • RFDUCFD FX HAUST FRt„r DIFSFI TRUCKS USED IN SNi)W RFMOVAI • INCREASED A&LITY TU :.CEP STPE~?'URNITUi' OUT YEAR ROUND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT 'WALrCJr:;: SURFACt • REDUCES NEED FOR HAND S110VCI ING • INCREASED VISIBILITY OF PAVING cl_IRFACF • RFDilCFD NFED FOH -Sfi.ND AND CIND.R`; 2ESULTING IM • LESS TRACKING lNTO Bi.KmtESSE? • REDUCES MATERIAL MAINTENANI-1. C0575 • R..L~ILED Ivt-ED FOR l-fIF `IICAL DbiCING • DISADVANTAGES • INITIAL CJ-PITAL ~6ST • UTILITY i_.75T VARLABILI7Y • POSSIE?!~E RECTIJCTION OF SNOW COUNTRY'_r ~•C?.o r"TER • ENViRUNMENTAL IMPACTS INCLUDING. • Ii~3C1"cA5EF1FO5SIL PJfL USAGC • COMPUSTION GASE- Ei illy SNOWMELT 801E FH`. • POTLINFIAL FOR SNOVMIELT SYSFEM FAILURE I<cVUiRING TRFUf710NAL SNOVv nLM.:'/AL • EXHAI KT 'PLUME" WHILC EC!LERS ARE (1 PFR ATING • Mf~RE FREQUENT WINTER CLEANING W::P ), '.~ BE NECESSARY -~ ~,~as~ j ~~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v-- -/ ~~ ~-- b I r.,. y ~ = ~I ~ I -- -I ', I ~_ ~~~ ~~" I _- -~---~- , _ -- r . ~ -_ L ~l • ~ ~ ~ x ~ - J ~` i /~ ~ ~ _ / ~ ~' ~~~~ ~~ //f I k'.. I. ~~ ~ __ ~ ~ ~ 1~~ f_'- GOLDEN PEAK /1 ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #3 ~ ~ ~ SNOWMF.LT ZONE #4 • TOTAL PROTECT AREA 90.000 S.F_ • AP~w'SNCWMF.L~ - 73,000 S.F. • AREA w/o SNOWMELT ~ 17,000 S.F • TOTAL INSTALLATION COST _ q 1.700.000 - 2 100,000 • TOTAL YEARI.'i OPEF.ATION COSTS - $142000 SNC n~~[Lr'YSTLM VIiull MAINENANCE COST -873,000 SNI:/T1L TE~WI"l'.'.::.'A.tI MAINILNANCL COST ~ $7,4.0 NC`~ TIO`Nn LTF f' WIN'FR STREET MAINTENANCE f:'1<-r $ 21,SS0 , \ i /i _ - . ~~ ~ '~~ .` \~~ ~ - , // ^~~ _ ~ bL1FER ~ s ~ ~' PLf`ZA ~, • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR PLOWING RESE.~.Tt?dG £?F • OISE REDUCTION • REDUCED J~10`!Y 9.f^VJ`!AL COST • REDUCED INTERFACE BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND NEA`lY E~}{pMENT • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEf^i SC10`NPtO`~(S .0.^10 DELI`/ERY TP.UCKS • RED !(-ED q{YSlCAE DAMAGE TC STREETSCAi+E ANC STRl}L'TUR[_ • RFDU _tD fXHA UST FROM DIFSFI TRU'_KS USED IN SNUW RFMUVAI • INCREASED ABILITY TO KEEP STR FFr cURNITI iac OUT YEAR ROUND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WAL'i1NG SURFACE • REDUCES NEED FOR HAND SHOVi-' ING • INCREASED VISIBILITY OF PAVING q g2FACL • P,.JU` LU NEE ] FO^. ;AND AND CINDERS RESULTING IN. • LESS TiWIXMiG MR3 &,9NESSE? t • REDUCES MATERIAL MAINTENAN'~ L COSTS • RF-''~iCED '.dL=D FOR C'-VF711G4L C~biCINC> • DISADVANTAGES • INITIAL CF.PITAL C~iST • UTILITY C~~]S"T VAAiA81LfTY • POSSIBLE ~"~FE~UCTION OF SNOW COUNTR CiJARACTER • ENVII+,:)NNENTAL IMPACTS INCLUDING. • INC2FA3EU FOSSIL FURL USAGE • COMfii571pN GASES TC?M SNOW MELT 00'd FRS • POT:~~vI IAL FOR SNOW('iE_T S*STEM FAILURL REQUIRING T P,P U;IONAL SNOW RGMO`/AL .'; • EJS I-AUST "PLUME" WHIIF R<u-FRS ARE OPERATING • MO{[ FREQUENT WINTER CLEANING WOU! L' BE NECESSARY ~ ~ a ~, • \ iP c , ``~c' ° 4 i_ -___~ \\ I ;~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ I _ ~.~ C I ~~ __ ~ ~ y \ ~ _ ~- I N _ `( i-° GOLDEN PEAK ~~~~ ~ ~ I .~, .._~ ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELTZONE #4 ~ ~ ~ °_ SNOWMELT ZONE #5 • T(~ f AL PROTECT AP.EA - 90,000 S-F_ • AREAw~ SNONMELT - 90,000 S.F • AREA w!o SNOWMELT ~ O S.F • TOTAL INSTALLATIC}V COST - 41,100,000 - 2,600.000 • TOTAL YtArcLFOPERATION CU~IS - $148,500 • $N~•:•1-~E ` SYSTEM u7ilTf -~'AINENANCE CGST ~ j 90,OGG • SN['hVMEi TED Wltt'. ..: 57.FEC~ ~ ~AINILNANCL COST ;, 58,. Cd N ~'-- ~- _ ~ '. L~-= __ - l~ ~_~; _ • IJ(`NCniO'NM:L7E~'vJINT<R jTREET MAINTENANCE !'!;<' _ $ C ;__.. -~~~~ - ` _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~k T ~. z • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR PLOWING RESCPcT7NG )?a. • NOISE REDUCTION • REDUCEC i9/`JOb A£f'/JiAi CC1T • REDUCED INTERFACE 6ET4VE6V PEOESPRLI~V AN'D r~cM14T E~W'1 FEN'i • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEEN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRUCKS • RLUU.`_FU PHYSI(:AL UAMAI,E 70 SI REEISC:APE ANU $IRUCIORES • RFDF IC-FD EXHAUST FR~_ ~ DIFSf1 TRUCKS USED IN SNUW RFMUVAI • INCRi.tiED ABILITY TC :CEP STP,EcT cLIRNITUP, OUT YEAR ROUND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WACta7G SURFACc • REDUCES NEED FOR HAND SHOYft'VG • INCREASED VISIBILITY OF PAVING 5'~_~RFACF • RF".l li-FD NEED Ft->k SAND AND CINUiILS ZESULTING IN: • LESS TRACKYNG INTO 8ii5itvFiSE? • R[DUCES MATCRIAL MAINTENAN'.-C COSTS • kv L+UL.ED !vi .D FOk Elie 11CAL DbIC INt_~ ~ DISADV,ANTAGES • INITIAL ~=i,PITAL .UST • UTILITI'~OST b'.3RIABILITY • POSS,a~1 r.ECiUCTION OF SNOW COUNTRY CHAP~CTER • FNV~,P.ONFt. EItiTAL IMPACTS INCLUDING: • -zEA+H>fOSSIL RJAL USAGE • COI•!CsF_6TlON GASES cP,;'lM sPFOWMELT BOILEt`_ • POTt NTIAL FOR SNOW F'F_T SYS FEM FAILURE I<c(JUIRING TRAUiTIONAL SNOW Re`hFG'i 4L • E:>t!-AI!ST "PLUME" WHIT F 6C'!_ERS ARE C)PFR HYING • F^e,zC FREQUENT WINT~ k CLEANING Wc)!fl i BE NECESSARY 9 ,r 1-~/ ~-~~ ~_- ~~I ~- ~~i ,~ i ', ~ ' ~s ~ 4'^ye,~"A's CIRCtE ~ ~`~.~~" -' ill _ A _ -_ _ I ~._ '~+1`x''6'4 ~h% ..~. ~.'R Y ~ -~ ~_- ) ~_1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~) ~ -~ \ C' ~~ / _ ~ ~ GOLDEN ~ ' ~~~G~ ~ ~` -- PEAK ~~_ ~ ° ~~; - ,l ~ - ~ ,A ' I_ ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #S ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN Design Matrix Synopsis: The consultant team in conjunction with the Town of Vail project staff would like to propose a means to ascertain the level of improvements desired for public spaces within the Village core. The proposed streetscape improvements would be subdivided into four levels of improvements, each designated by specific objectives. These levels would allow the community, Town project staff, and Town Council to make objective and informed decisions regarding the future of public spaces in the Village Core. The proposed improvements would be assembled in a design matrix through which improvement recommendations and guidelines could be formulated and ensure that everyone involved in the process understands final level of streetscape improvements. The following are the proposed improvement levels: Essential Improvements This level includes restoration of existing materials and features in their current Village configuration or replacement with more durable materials where appropriate with little or no additional cost. No significant changes would be made to the location of existing site elements: walls, planters, features, etc. For example: asphalt streets, drainage improvements, lighting of dark areas, fountain repair, utility repair/replacement, paving surface repair, and resolution of public health, safety, and welfare concerns. The cost of these basic improvements is the minimum baseline expense for the project. 2. Basic Enhancements This level includes modifications to the existing streetscape elements to facilitate long term Village maintenance, improve service and delivery patterns, encourage visitor circulation/access, and enhance appearance in addition to improvements recommended at level one. For example: minor relocation of features /landmarks! walkways to enhance service /maintenance access and clarify pedestrian circulation (paving upgrades and some integrated art) and removing unnecessary obstacles providing improved opportunities for building access (minor planter and wall changes). 3. Activity Enhancing Improvements This level introduces an additional layer of streetscape modifications to enhance the ability of public spaces to support a greater intensity and variety of pedestrian uses and special events. These improvements, in turn, would be expected to improve retail viability. For example: special paving improvements, more extensive seating, reconfiguring plaza spaces to be more favorable for special events, upgrading lighting systems, banner poles, special art focus points (integrated art), extensive planter changes, specialty paving, and landscape improvements. 4. Image Enhancement This level introduces an additional layer of special place-making features and landmarks that would provide a memorable visitor experience and set Vail apart from other mountain communities. For example: overall public art and sculpture, fire and water features, sound systems, architectural lighting improvements, increased pedestrian connections to other areas within the village core, architectural landmarks, and expansion of retail segment into. the public space. Any of these measures could be implemented through public-private partnerships. *Snowmelt in levels 2-4 could include all or part of Village core. 17 Plaza Example: Vail Streetscape Design: Street Connection Children's Fountain Earl Eaton Plaza Checkpoint Charlie Sample Design Matrix Example: Wall Street plaza 1. Essential Improvements Paving replacement Fountain and paving repair Relocation of fountain 2. Basic Enhancements Planter relocation sculpture fo reduce corrosion and improve service access Relocation of fountain Modification of stairs and sculpture to provide greater 3. Activity Enhancing Improvements terraces intensify and activities; provide venue opportunities for special events Fire and water feature European style cobbled stone adjacent to steps, new lighting paving, a relocated, 4. Image Enhancement systems and seating areas, redesigned water interactive architectural modification to water feature with a warming Arcade Building hearth in the winter Consensus of community for minimum improvements