The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-08-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionAMENDED AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL... WORK SESSION Tuesday, August 6, 2002 2:00 P.M. NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. Anniversaries: (15 min.) Janine Bender -10 years Russ Forrest -10 years . Kurt Mulson - 25 years 2. Greg Hall ITEMITOPIC: Vail Village Streetscape Design (45 min.) Bill Wenk Sherry Dorward Brent Lloyd ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Discuss, modify, agree on the strategies for decision making, snowmelt priorities and general comments on direction for the Vail Village Streetscape Design. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District needs to replace the waterlines in Vail Village. The Town's desire to complete the streetscape once the lines are complete requires the town to have a design. The Town has hired Wenk Associates to perform this task. The project team has conducted a series of public focus groups during a three days in June and has held two community meetings in July. This work session is to review the findings of the work to date and to discuss a decision-making methodology. In addition, staff is looking for direction on snowmelt priorities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Discuss information presented. 3. ITEM/TOPIC: Town Council briefing on Y2003-2004 Budget. (30 min.) Pam Brandmeyer Judy Camp Steve Thompson 4. ITEM/TOPIC: REVENUE DISCUSSION: (45 min.) Judy Camp Steve Thompson Use Tax on Building Materials 1. How collected? 2. Potential Revenue Estimates 3. How revenues could be spent 4. Possible boundaries for the tax 5. Potential sunset provision 5. ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance No. 19, Series 2002, an ordinance establishing Matt Mire standards and regulations regarding the protection of wildlife. (45 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with amendments or reject Ordinance No. 19. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This issue was discussed at council work session on July 2, 2002. At that time, the council's direction was to come back with an appropriate ordinance. For additional details please see the F: mcaster//ws/2002/080602 l~~C VAIL TOWN COUNCIL . WORK SESSION Tuesday, August 6, 2002 2:00 P.M. NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. Greg Hall ITEM/TOPIC: Vail Village Streetscape Design (45 min.) Bill Wenk Sherry Dorward Brent Lloyd ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Discuss, modify, agree on the strategies for decision making, snowmelt priorities and general comments on direction for the Vail Village Streetscape Design. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Eagle River Water and Sanitation .District needs to replace the waterlines in Vail Village. The Town's desire to complete the streetscape once the lines are complete requires the town to have a design. The Town has hired Wenk Associates to perform this task. The project team has conducted a series of public focus groups during a three days in June and has held two community meetings in July. This work session is to review the findings of the work to date and to discuss a decision-making methodology. In addition, staff is looking for direction on snowmelt priorities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Discuss information presented. 2. Anniversaries: (15 min.) Janine Bender -10 years Russ Forrest -10 years Kurt Mulson - 25 years 3. ITEM/TOPIC: Town Council briefing on Y2003-2004 Budget. (30 min.) Pam Brandmeyer Judy Camp Steve Thompson 4. ITEM/TOPIC: REVENUE DISCUSSION: (45 min.) Judy Camp Steve Thompson Use Tax on Building Materials 1. How collected? 2. Potential Revenue Estimates 3. How revenues could be spent 4. Possible boundaries for the tax 5. Potential sunset provision 5. ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance No. 19, Series 2002, an ordinance establishing Matt Mire standards and regulations regarding the protection of wildlife. (45 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with amendments or reject Ordinance No. 19. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This issue was discussed at council work session on July 2, 2002. At that time, the council's direction was to come back with an appropriate ordinance. For additional details please see the F : m c aster//w s/2 002/0 8 0602 memorandum dated June 25, 2002 from Dwight Henninger and Matt Lindvall to the Vail Town Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:. Approve, or approve with amendments, Ordinance No. 19 on first reading. 6. DRB (7/17)/PEC (7/22) Report. (5 min.) 7. Information Update. (5 min.) 8. Matters from Mayor and Council. (5 min.) 9. Adjournment. (5:00 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2002, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN THE TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. , THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2002, BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. F: mcaster/agendas/ws/2002/070202 TOWN COUNCIL PACKET AUGUST 6, 2002 Prepared by Wenk Associates ~I~ ~/ISOC~ ~ g STREETSCAPE DESIGN ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN Table of Contents Design objectives and givens Summary of comments from Public Workshop on June 26-28, 2002 Proposed activity and circulation diagram. presented July 11, 2002 Snowmelt feasibility review Design matrix 3 4 6 7 17 2 ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN The following design objectives and givens were approved by Town Council on June 18, 2002. Design Objectives • Establish a level of quality consistent with Vail's Vision "to be the premiere mountain resort community". • E~espect the community's sensitive alpine setting. • Create a vibrant pedestrian village which encourages day and evening activity. • Support year-round economic performance of retail, restaurant, and lodging. • Improve pedestrian wayfinding. • Consider compatible adjacent uses for guests, businesses, and residents. • Address operation and maintenance considerations. • Involve the community members who will be affected by the plan so that the final product respects their need and goals. Givens • The project will follow goals established by the 1991 Streetscape Master Plan • Plans will be grounded in community input • The design team will consider all ideas for improvements and will communicate how suggestions are used • The design will be from building face to building face • Snowmelt will be investigated and decided upon early in the process • Public art will be integrated into the design • Phasing plans will be coordinated, minimize impact, and make sense • The plan will be constructible and developed in phased packages to minimize impacts on the Village during the July -August peak summer season •. Plans will include a base plan, which will meet the needs of the budget • The first phase of construction will commence in spring of 2003 • Safety and public welfare will not be jeopardized • Town Council is the final decision-maker 3 _- ,.. . ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN Summary of comments from Public Workshop on June 26-28, 2002 Points of Consensus: • Village streets look tired and need upgrading • Physical improvements will not solve all the retail problems • Do not "mall" the village core; do not make the village look like Beaver Creek • Greater intensity of activity in the streets is desired • An extended pedestrian/retail experience is desired • "Softer" street activities are preferred over larger events • Some existing plazas are not as functional as they could be • Multi-functionality of streets and plazas should be maximized to provide more venues • Need more places /things that appeal to children • Need signage that provides better direction to stores • Improvement in trash pick-up and service /delivery systems would be desirable if feasible • Unique qualities, hand-crafted nature, and scale of the Village Issues needing further discussion: • Snowmelt pros and cons • Priorities for improvement -how to decide where to start? • Differentiation of "districts" within the village core vs. consistent themes • Character and use of key public spaces (Children's Fountain Plaza, Founders' Plaza) Areas of disagreement: • Snowmelt: aesthetics, costs • Events and street activities: target market, size, venue, noise Ideas that generated excitement: • History walk • "Green" technology and energy efficiency for snowmelt and lighting 4 • Public art • Special lighting to define landmarks and public spaces • Street chessboards • Integrated bike /ski / snowboard parking locations • Banner poles . • Public information kiosks and district directory signs • More outdoor dining opportunities Temporarily Parked issues: • Opportunities for public /private cooperation • Funding mechanisms (BID, TIF, Town of Vail capital budget) • Visual /physical connection with other commercial areas (Crossroads, WI, Meadow Drive) • Continuity of design elements /theme throughout village • Designated occupancy levels for plazas and pedestrian areas during events • Parked issues that will be addressed at a future time: • Revision of Town of Vail sign code and lighting standards in the core , • Programming for special events • Possibility of incentives for private development • Funding mechanisms (BID, TIF, Town of Vail capital budget) • Conference center • Private design assistance for retailers (lighting, storefront design, signage) • Commercial /retail environment (retail mix, landlord /tenant relations) • Coordination with development of event venues elsewhere in Vail • Streamwalk from Covered Bridge to Willow Bridge • Revised delivery and trash service alternatives for the Village core 5 CHILDREN'S FOUNTAIN 6RIDGC STREET ' - -- • a.CT F ', ~'I ~, ,Farr - - , - ~ - • Lr ~„,w ~rl:.. -_ _ • -T -.-.-. +,o~-~rr:norr r,i, GORE CREEK PROMENADE • TFF,c'"'f -. • I a.a ,EP;- ;E-AS~~rrAL • -.;1':F ... ),F.. ~-P L~~SJRV~DS . PIaEL I~.,PT -- _ - -.F ;: ,iJ. • PE lP_E ','/AT:"yll,ci - `~``I - _ - - • i . iCCT[C `"I,W CC P,~.I[}[+F • JF k11 t Ii CV.: I • R E. (.()IJfJE JIU1J - - -- • 'IPa F J>fi1 T OAS=BPFT CIP: LE • rl ~' I '1P ~ • EnER ~t,Ci ,EP :ICE 4CCE S - - '` -_ ~~ - - - - - • = F~ ,FU ~ FP aCF CCCESS • PE_FEPT i,~~nC, ,,,~< _. ° ~ - ~ VILLAGE PH.RKIhJG -- ~_-_ 'T" - - -. . _ _ -- GORE CREEK DRIVE EAST GORE CREEK DRIVE WEST _ a JL!F _ l t\?xi ,- r - - BFI r~ - f P~~ ce `.~zT ' - S k'~ 6~~''3 4 + • ( iPf + IlIJL it":!1, '•: • tt:;.na,I LLr-a rht[ `c~'' ~4 t ,.. .;, u_1 +I,n. • L t 'r ~ rl-. ~-. ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~" ~ ~ • E I-~. ErJI L PEEL 6?OCf Ar•JD • II ilJ F f T ~' "' I ;~ F ~ t ~ ~ L N N ;FAiI E • f "Tt[ +f , FP PA,.(.i Fa° 3' ~~ ~ - ;.. T~~ _ • .t J i Cf I L a~ e. LS .` - f q ~ ~ .;. `.. ~ ,.._ • , JKTI J T;, Cho F .. t$ _ - _ r'.,.+' l= lt..lll..~ ~ .r'''~ i'' - . „ ..._ • ~l if .E,:~,~. >ES"~'M':E nC fS: c.: } ,. ~ ." ,. ,` ` ,-.1 ~~ ^k ,:. FORD.. I _ ~ ~ PARK ..... ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~~' ~ ~ ~`~ ~ ~}~~.~~ ,' • F OPMENT WEST CORE CREEI[ PL ~ ~~ - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ (CH ECKPOINT CHART-IE1 AzA =~ s"` _ _- ~~ - P3RrJ DFVF~- 4t F„-F • '-1 .1 ~-~_.... IPC~;_, ,,.; ., _ - -- ..,/-. .. ;, 'Ira.,.. r.'-.. t'.L I I, i' L4T:,:f, c `, - J ~ '. -.,,vd^'°` • 'iPll tP'EF`UtLt%kPT • l ~StilR,T l•~ 1 ~ , i /n 1 • 1 CP L JPfP3EUICT (sLE St ~ •~ ,' 4. ~ I ~ _ • IP" E TPEDS ATP I?IJ j' ° • ~ .+R 11 IHT nl ET I+r~i:E 1 ~ ~. // , ,~•~ ~~ , .~` r I . - - T ~ ~~°` r ~ r , ,..... SF_IRFR ' ~ I' C CLE WALL STREET }? -' 1 ~ , ~ • PEUE;T~14L ~JG,IiEC TI6hl'rdr_i ~[AP5 ~' ~ _. s -=. r - I ~ ~ ~_ - - - ~ ' ' . T L Ii.LC10.P.1. • Ir'Tl.AL'F rr PC,Ck FTS ^. / ~'~ ~ ~ i- • • I t•k,.13 • r r.C -,nor .P.7u'~aT E3 fr..~~ ? ~ ~~ ~ ff ~ ~ +~, ~~~ -- ~~-« i ~ • i rJAL ULJ'lA ~: • .TPFETETFPTPU'JI9EIJT -' -" ~ ~``J+~-~~ I ~i - • SC-p'tr1USIC A'J;?AF1 ,.. >I :.: aa" lPinJ-FIFE 1 ~ - -~~~-- : .a. ~i< • a TPI -t P4 l.f.T.~lrl PN F. ~' ~ ~ , ~ - - • Et I[a.,Er~~' >[3'vlCf.n'~_E~5 -.' `•~ '`.,, ," - - - /f ~ \ - ' . , ~t_ Nl.tt,]Iy CII U+JiI(Nl EARL EATON PLAZA ~; • F=ii,F .1.41 f _F ~ ?~w,,,, ~ I~ ~•+an.~~clY -~-- ,.d,. I,;;:,t, ~~~.rPrucrn' I VAIL FRONT DOOR PROJECT -~ _ GOLDEN IT„P PF ETrve • L .. APED ~ • - <,f .'1= _ , , .~ I FLAK Laa,d{rxks • r'.;r - eP, PLC', .,p EA - ~ - • -L u = ~ ~ - • .o-.-a..tcnraJ ~ • L ~L~II I, .,- J r.nuS • S_~ 111 CPP~iP Tl ITIE> • ~rF>'Ir,n'..r. "~- • . Acnrih Nodes . - 711 villc~~e PROPOSED ACTIVITY PROGRAMMING DIAGRAM ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN snowmelt Feasibility Review I. General The objective of this report is to discuss the feasibility of installing a mechanical snowmelt system in conjunction with the proposed deep utility upgrade and streetscape remodel. The principal areas reviewed include (please refer to the locations indicated on the attached graphics for more information): Zone 1 -consists of Bridge Street from the Covered Bridge to Seibert Circle. Zone 2 -consists of Earl Eaton Plaza, Wall Street, Children's Fountain plaza, and the stairs on the east end of Gore Creek Promenade. Zone 3 -consists of the section of Gore Creek Drive between the west edge of the Children's Fountain Plaza up to and including Checkpoint Charlie, the section of Gore Creek Drive between Mill Creek and Bridge Street, and Hanson Ranch Road between Seibert Circle and Mill Creek. Zone 4 -consists of Gore Creek Promenade and the section of Willow Bridge Road between the south end of the bridge and Checkpoint Charlie. Zone 5 -consists of the section of Hanson Ranch Road between Mill Creek and the chute, the chute, and the section of Gore Creek Drive between Mill Creek and the chute. Current snowmelt in these areas is limited to a few private property installations around building perimeters. II. Advantages A. Reduces need for plowing resulting in: 1. Noise reduction. 2. Reduced snow removal cost. 3. Reduced interface between pedestrians and heavy equipment. 4. Minimized conflicts between snowplows and delivery trucks. 5. Reduced physical damage to streetscape and structures. 6. Reduced exhaust from diesel trucks used in snow removal. 7. Increased ability to keep street furniture out year round. 6. Safer more consistent walking surface. C. Reduces need for hand shoveling. D. Increased visibility of paving surface. E. Reduced need for sand and cinders resulting in: 1. Less tracking of sand and cinders into businesses. 2. Reduces material/maintenance cost. 7 G. Reduction in worker's compensation claims. III. Disadvantages A. Initial capital cost (refer to attached graphic for estimated costs). B. Perpetual utility cost (refer to attached graphic for estimated costs). C. Possible reduction of snow country character. D. Environmental impacts including: Increased fossil fuel usage. Products of combustion expelled from boilers. E. Potential for snowmelt system failure requiring traditional snow removal. F. Exhaust steam "plume" while boilers are operating. G. More frequent winter cleaning would be necessary.. IV. System Options and Considerations A. General Several different types of snowmelt systems were reviewed including: gas-fired boilers with buried hydronic tubing, buried electric cables, gas infrared heating, electric infrared heating, and a solar heated system with buried hydronic tubing. We found agas-fired boiler system with buried hydronic tubing to be the best solution because it is relatively easy to install, has a comparatively low operating cost, is proven reliable, and provides a uniform melting pattern. Following is a brief discussion of the major system components and considerations associated with agas-fired boiler system with buried hydronic tubing. B. Boiler Plant We have reviewed the following locations as potential boiler plant locations: the area to the northwest of the International Bridge, a vault buried below Checkpoint Charlie, and the area south of the Village Parking Structure. Expanding the existing boiler room on the north side of level 2 in the Village parking structure may be another potential solution if the area to be snowmelted is limited to a relatively small area (Bridge Street for example). Another potential solution is to locate the boiler plant within the future "Front Door" development. Since the boiler room must be large enough to house the system's boilers, pumps, controls, etc., the estimated boiler room size will be a big factor in determining the best location. The estimated boiler room size ranges from 20 square feet (to accommodate the smallest single zone) to 1,000 square feet (to accommodate the combined area of all five zones). Another significant factor in determining the best boiler room location is the proximity to the snowmelted area. If snowmelt is a consideration for the East Meadow Drive streetscape remodel, the area northwest of the International Bridge may be the best option because it is fairly centrally located. C. Heat Distribution Main distribution piping would be buried below the street to carry heating water solution (50% water and 50% propylene glycol) to serpentine tubing located under the streetscape. Potential tubing configurations include installing the tubing in a sand or pea gravel layer under the finished paving material, embedding the tubing in concrete under the finished paving material, or embedding the tubing directly in the finished paving material. Any of these options, or a combination of these options, is feasible depending on the finished paving material. The option that may have the most merit is ~to locate the tubing in a sand or pea gravel layer below the finished paving material. This option would allow the tubing to be temporarily moved allowing flexibility for future road construction and minimizing the risk of damaging the tubing while accessing buried utilities. D. Environmental Considerations Natural gas is one of the cleanest burning fossil fuels. However, there are some environmental impacts to consider. Natural gas burns much cleaner than the gasoline and diesel fuel burned by the loaders and other trucks used in traditional snowmelt removal. Since natural gas is primarily composed of methane, the principal by-products produced when it is burned are carbon dioxide and water vapor along with very small amounts of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a "greenhouse" gas and is thought to contribute to global warming. Nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide emissions contribute to the formation of "acid rain". H. Phasing Considerations The snowmelt system installation can be phased to progress with the utility and streetscape upgrades. Also, because the cost of the boiler plant will likely be about 30% of the total cost of the snowmelt system, construction of the boiler plant could be postponed to the end of the project to reduce capital costs at the beginning of the project. snowmelt Feasibility Review prepared by Beaudin Ganze Consulting Engineers VAIL VILLAGE STREETSCAPE DESIGN SNOWMELT COST ESTIMATE DATA FOR VARIOUS ZONES ZONE t ZONE 2 ZONE 3 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 TOTALS APPROXIMATE AREA(s.F.) 13,500 27,500 21,500 10,500 17,000 - 90,000 ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE COST WITH SNOWMELT SYSTEM $6,775 $17,875 $13,975 $6,825 $11,050 $58,500 ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE COST WITHOUT SNOWMELTSYSTEM $25,100 $50,025 $23,350 $20,250 $21,550 $140,275 ESTIMATED SNOWMELT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COST $337,500 $687,500 $537,500 $262,500 $425,000 $2,250,000 SUGGESTED ESTIMATED SNOWMELT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COST RANGE 300K-400K 650K-750K 500K-600K 250K-350K 400K-500K 2100K-2600K ESTIMATED SNOWMELT SYSTEM UTILITY COST AND MAINTENANCE COST $13,500 $27,500 $21,500 $10,500 $17,000 $90,000 NOTES: 1-ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE COSTS WITH SNOWMELT SYSTEM INCLUDE CLEANING, HAND AND MECHANICAL SWEEPING (THESE TASKS ARE NOT NEEDED IF STREETSCAPE IS PLOWED 2-ESTIMATED WINTER STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITHOUT SNOWMELT SYSTEM INCLUDE PLOWING, SHOVELING, HAULING, SANDING, DAMAGE REPAIR, PLOW FUEL, PLOW MAINTENANCE, CLEANING AND SWEEPING ($ PER GREG HALL ON BI1I02) 3-ESTIMATED SNOWMELT SYSTEM UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE NATURAL GAS, POWER, AND STANDARD SYSTEM EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES 4-ESTIMATED UTILITY COSTS ARE BASED ON NOVEMBER 2001-MARCH 2002 NATURAL GAS PRICE OF 50.45 PER THERM NON-SNOWMELT CONFIGURATION _ • ADVANTAGES • TC -~.L PROIEC7 l;REA - 90,000 S.F_ - ~_ MAINTAIN SNOW REMCJVrY_ ; A '^ • AREAwi SNr,WMCL7 ~ O S.F. _ ~L '-- • PREDICT C,aiE TM1f,'RS'E1SAt~CE r ~ uu Y C^v5? • A0.EA w:u SMODV'AfELT - 90,000 S.F / _ • MAINTAIN SNOW COUNTRY CHARACTER • TOTAL tNS7ALLATIQV COST ~ $ 0 - - /~ • NO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS fROCt S'NOYYMEL7 BOfiERS _~r'~_fr ~ • NO 8.4CKUP SNOW REMOVAL SYSTEM REQUIRED • TOTAL YEARS OPEn4TION COSTS - $140.275 ~~__ - • NO ADDITIONAL CA?7TAi CCl;Tr SN .: ~+,1-;T 'YSTEM t-.T1-~tl t r MAINENANCE COST $ 0 ~ -~- - _ • NO ADDITIONAL WINTER SWEEPING NEC''-iARY SV : VME: FED WI^I ".f. S'PEET MAINTENANCE COS I $ 0 _ /- _ M'NS"iJNF7ELTED WINTCR STREET MAIVTENANCEfO~i $140,275 ~ ~-~ ~ DISADVANTAGES h~_. ._. „"" y., .. ., • .-.eS'vOE Att?si ESS i5`UES RELATED TO PLOWING: - ,~,r~ ~FER ' e 7i ' ,T. ,~ ~ NO44F _ ~~ ~ b~~~~~~~~r~ PL ZA SNOW REMOVAL COST ~, ~1G~~ ~~C = • CO C W S X11 ^r, FAVY E(:' I~ MENT IS ~3~ ~ ~' !i~ ~i .. ( ~ CONFIt I eEiWEEP. 'SVOWPL T.'vS ANCY DELIVERY IRUCKS _ L 11 "" ~ ~ rk'. aq, ,~ ~~ '. • Pr`if CAI DA'i,~GE TC STRFFTSCAPF AtVI) I' U ~FSIRFS `€".`~\ ~ ___ : F+!iAUS ~ F1 7"I DIESEL TRUCKS USED IN SN ~f t':NOVAL -~ r'.U?r S' R. LT I ., .V; IJRE REMOVED DUP,'"t; SN6 t. JCA`.ON • POTENTIALLY UNSAFE WAL~:iNG i:;RFACE \ ~~ ~.' z '^~\~ • HANDSI-+OVELING REQUIRED 1 ~~"~~ • PAVING SERFAGE CTRSCURRED ~, ~ ~ `~_` J "_ ~ GORg CRfE • ,AVD CND CINDERS REQUIRED - "R TRACTION / ~ ~ K • TRA:=YtVG INTO i bl N ~,_ES -.~ ~ ~' ~•~ CHILDRENS • MATFRIAI MAINT(NAtJCE. C. -..~: ~ j A, , - FOUNTAIN - - • CHEMICAL DE-ICING SI ILL USED FOR TRACTION ~, j COPE CREEK CP .h w ..- ~ - " m ~CHEC'KFOYN7 r - ~- , ;: o ~ I CHf~UE -'_ ~ ~ ~ ~ i m 1 ~ ""' ~~ I- -~ \ z -,. x ., -. :.. `- .t fit- `'A- ~" C'.. ~ -~ '~ _ ~, ' m T ~~ _ I 7 ~' ~L ;. ' ~ ''r ~ ,` . _ '~~ ~~>~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ zt ~ ~~ ~,_ ~ f .. 3 Pr ~~ ~~~ .~ ~ ~ _-._ EARL F.QT 1N - ~ O~Q' ~~ ' ., ~ 6~rls+,i Nf"V ELI ;;- SEYdEti7 _ ~ ~,, -.. - `1 - _ j ~ ' ~' `~ _> ~~ ~ s+ z;u /y '~, ~ ~~~' -`Si`~P, GIRLIE `S., r ~ II _- ~- I l _ ~ ! , ~_~ rT ~ ~i~ x~, pr ~4 ~rr T~ "'~„J f' 'ti. ~f 4r -~.-_ 3 /v I aa I ~~ ~ I / ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~' -~ ~~ ~~ GOLDEN O \~_~2~/ // ~`_ _ ~/ ~- \ PEAK ~~ L7 ~L ~ ~~ ~ _ ~~, ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT-NONE t ^ SNOWMELT ZONE #I • Tt jT,1L PkO~ECT ~RE> - 90,000 S.F. • AREA wI SNCNVM GLT - 13,500 S.F. • AREA wlo SNOWMELT - 76,500 S.F. • TOTAL INSTALLAI I{)N COST - $300.000 - 400.000 • TOTALYEAKLYOPeK4TIONCOSIS - $137,450 • SN'~'+vM_LT !.YSIFM UIILlIY'MAINFNAhJCF COSI $ IS,SUU • SNr1fiIP1 H-It-11 WI'~';RS RFE7I~V~IIJTCNANCL COST - J 8,i i5 • nlr?M_N~?'/~?•=LTEP'•ANTER CTRFET MAIPJTENANCE F~~<T $ 113,173 -- ~ ~ ~ ~\ --~ i s ?Ma • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR PLOWING RF_SI1LTf?SG £?6 • NO~cE RFDUCT!`JN • R[Dl1CED SNOW RFJ`1f1VAl_f_fjST • REDUCED INTERFACE BETWEEN PEDESTRIMi AN6 NEA`i'f fQil•.s'P'.f3iT • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEEN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRUCKS • REDt 1,":D PHYS/(-?/_ QAMA!.:F r<} SrwffTr_,aPE AA(4 S??J1GTlU+F_5 • RCDUCED CXI IAUST FROM V ttSCL TRUCKS USCD IN SN O`N RCMOVAL • INCREASED ABILITY TO KEL;'~T4.EET'l1RNITUP,E Ol1T YEAR ROl1ND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WALK1N t; SURFACE • .REDUCES NEED FOR HAND SHOVE;.ING • INCREASED VISIRII ITY OF PAVING CI 3iFACE • REDUCED NEED El"i G, jANp AND CINDE^ri RESULTING IN. • LESS TRAC](1NG UVTO EIUSINESSE • iEUUCES MATERIAL~Mr.INTENAt`~:E':!'oTS • RECUi.ED IJF?D FOk i.HFMICAL Ut-IUNG • DISADVANTAGES • INIT iAL C.?.PITAL COST • UTILITY (-.OST VARIABILITY • POSSIBLE •zEDUCTION OF SNGW COUNTR'l BHA RP CTER • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS INCLUDING: • N.HFA;EU 055-L °LiAI USAGE • COMS'h I ION GASES FF,C~M SNOW MELT BOILER' • POTEi+ITIAL FOR SNOWME_T SfTEM FAILURE REQUIRING ~~hGiTIONAL SNOW REi~iGY'iL • EXEAi 1ST "PLUME" WHILE BL~!_E.4S ARE naoRATING • Mt~iF FREQUENT WINTER CLEANING Wn .: n BE NECESSARY rLU 0.0 ~~ .~i " `_ "~~ O __-- '__ EARL EATON Q.P '~ ~ l-~/~~ ~ /~ P ~ _ / .. _ PLAZA ~ rP<~O .: ~ ,-~I ~ y~ ~~ I. ,'' ~~ I ~- _,I -_ ~ ~ ~- ~ _ y ~~ __. ___ \ ' ' ,v ~ r_ lA, i_. __ ~--'_'-' !~_ ~ '" & FER / -~. 11 v5'i ,, ~ - ~ --__ ~ ~i / ~ _~ ~ ~ GOLDEN ~~~ 7Y ! ~ ~,~„ PEAK ~ SEFaERT ` ~ ' 1 CIRCLE ~ II I - --~ I \-\ ~~ ~~ ~ ~- -- ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #1 ~ ~ SNOWMELT CONFIGURATION #2 ~ ADVANTAGES • • Ti .TAI PROTECT ARE> - 90,000 S.F_ ~~ - L~ • REDUCES NEED FOR F20WYNG RESi7LT)t3G tN • Ak' A .v, SNUWM!--! 7 - 41,000 SF - - \ _ NOISE REDUCTION • AREA a~ u ~t•Ch'r?4r3_3 49,000 SF. - ~ ~ --_ _ _ I • REDUCED if/Jdi A'c'Y/.>`ORi CcIT - - _ _- ~ • REDUCED INTERFACE BETY4'EEN' r't-DES'(RIAN AN'D i'!~t4'1' E~IYI tE!VT • TOTAL INSTALLATION COST - 5930,000 • t,t30 DB0 ^ MINIMIZED CONFLICTS OETWEEN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRUCKS , ~ i_ _ AED V C,ED PLAYS/CAL DAMAGE TD S7AEE75CAPE AND STR VCTUAES • TOTAL YEAFIY OPEhATION COSTS - $I)2,BOO _ 'T: _~_ 1 ~ • RFDUI.rD EXHAUST FROM.-SFI TRUCKS USED IN SNOW RFMUVAI SN.:++•'r ' 1 `.YSTEM U IIiT~ ! MAINENANCE COST - ~ I ~ ` S 41,60D _- ! • INCREASED ABILITY TO KEEP `TRCCr cURNlrI IRE OUT YEAR ROUND SNOwNEI 1 -DWI^ITFR iTAFFT MAWTfNAN CE COST _ _ b :gG50 _ __ ~ -~ ~~ • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WALfKING SUta"ACC • NGr+i<ndn nr-LLTEr~ var.~icR STREET MAINTCNANCC K~r ~~- $ 63, i30 ,.,. _ - • RFDIICFS NFFD F(lR HA Ni] Wf}1P1 IVG S~ 1',' . _ SHR,EAT ,~ I I 11~ \. I ~- ~ CIRCLE ~ I I ~ 4 ~~;~~ _r~ " I / f~ %~~ .'dg I~~ - ~ ~ ~_ ~~ r. 1 Ir~ ! ~ __- I % ~ - / ~~ ~ ~ ~ GOLDEN ' / "1 ~-'7, l~ /r)7~~~' PEAK ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~-_ ~ - -- ~ ~ j i _ .. ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #2 ~ ~ SNOWMEI.T ZONE #3 • TC1T.1L PROTECT AREA - 90,000 5,F_ • AREIn w' SlvC"~/JMEL' ~ 62,500 S.F • AREA w/o SNOWMELT ~ 27,500 S-F. • TOTAL INSTALLAT4€DV COST - $4450.000 - 1,750,000 • TOTAL 7eArr(OFERATfON COSTS - $144,925 • 5+10Wt~EL .YSTLM JTIL!T~t MAINENANCE COST - $ 62.506 ~;._ ;;C..7EL ~,..i; 7T••atl MAINILNANCL COST - S' 40,L.'~ + NC]M1i<NOWM=i eFf~'/JINTER STREET MAINTENA VCE ~~}~2 - $ 43,SOD F' ' ,_~ ~ il. I_ ~- '_ . f~l ~~~ - -- --~`~ ~C7 v ~~ ~, ~ .. ~,,. .. .. ;.. . , +. ,, ~FER _ t~~ ~` tT~ ~. ~ IPI_AZA ~'!.~ 4 ~l~ ~ ~~~„ \ i x` .`~ -t~~, / i-~~ % ~ \\ -~ I _` \ Z~~/ _~ / ~V ~~u ~E:=~3,;: t m~s fi~~>~ ~ ry a~ , ~~ • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR F'LOWYNG RESULT§NG tN. • NOISE REDUCTION • REDUCED 5>/JO6 AEY/v`dR. C J ; • REDUCED INTERFACE &ETYL~EV r~OESTRtAiV AN'O FrkRL1' E~?:Ab'1`k'N'i • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEEN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRUCKS • RLDUC~ED PHYSI(:AL DAMA ,E IO STREETSCAF'E AND SI Rl1CIl1RES • REDUCED EXHAUST FR r~ DIFSFI TRUCKS USED IN SNUW RFM UVAI • INCREASED ABILITY TG :LEP ST4cOT'URNITUP,F0UT YEAR ROUND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WALL<7NL SURFACC • REDUCES NEED FOR HAi+lD SHOtiftiVG • INCREASED VISIBILITY OF PAVING S! IRFACF • REC~'.IC-.F[3 rJFED FOR °s c,ND AND CIM1..-~_"rt~3 tESULTING IN: • LESS TRACKING lNTO ~ SYtvESSE • REDUCES MATERIAL / MAINTENAN<.t CDST; • R -~.aK.FD Itil-~D FOE. c, r1E `IICAL Dt-ICING • DISADVANTAGES • INITIAL C?PITAL COST • UTILITY CJST VARA48!!!TY • POS~19lE REC~UCTION OF SNOW COUNTR' ~',;A;=TER • ENV..,iUNMIENTAL IMPACTS INCLUDING: IP ~'I„ 3EA. Ff;FGSSIL F t+.L USAGC COMRI. ~TION GASF '-+~i7M SNOWMELT BOIL EF_ • POTLI*tilAL FOR SNOL'S4-CELT SYaFEM FAILURE iL!,}UIRING TRFDf i TONAL SNOVv kLM ~`?AL • EXHAI KT "PLUME" WH0.t 8C!! ERS ARE OPFR ATING • Mf~R.f: FREQUENT WINTPR CLEANING W~i4 , f~ BE NECESSARY ~. r . / .. i J l- -_ `, r E ~~~ SE 48ERT s ~ 'I _ ~ r CIRCLE :. ~ - v ~ a!l T' a s.7 ! C `, .~, 1 1 125 ~ ~ __ : 3f F~ ~_ `~q p I ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ -' ~ GOLDEN \ ~ l_ - ~~ i ~ PEAK o ~i~~/ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ 5, ~ - ~ P ,- \~ iJ ~ f \ /~ ~ ~- I ____ ~ ~~~ ~ ~_i I ~ -- ~~~. - ~__,~ u~l ~ .._~. ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #3 e ~ ~ ~ SNOWMF.LT ZONE #4 • TOTAL PROTECT AREA - 90,000 $.F • ARE4 wl SNC.'WMEL r - 77,000 S.F. • AREA wlo SNOWMELT ~ 17,000 i.F • TOTAL INSTALLATION COST - $ I.T00,000 - 2,100,000 • TOTAL7tARI.'iOPEFATIONCOSTS - $142,000 • SNV ~+I'~tLT SYSTEM ~; 1 ~~i I I ' MAINENANCE COST ~ $ 73,000 • SNC"F'h1U TED WI"l'.'.i: S'ALLT MAINTENANCE fUSI $ 47,410 • N('.NWOV~ra=LTF r` WINTCR STREET MAIN7ENA VCE ~: ~" - $ 21,$$0 ~~~ " , y,, : ~ ~ ~~,u a~~d ~ ~ , 'F ~'~ ~.. ~. ~. _ _ dole , ~ c =. F'i ~...x ~ _ ~M. a},[: Y~ o- I S ~ Rk ~~~6~ + • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR PLOWING RESLlLTt"tG £"h. • OISE REDUCTION • REDUCED J~19`N 9.E4VJVAL COST • REDUCED INTERFACE BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND NEAYY E+~}1PMENT • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETWEE*1 SClC`0+P10`P+S .4^iC CEIlYEP.Y Ta;;CKS + RED I<' FD MiYiiCAt DAMAGE TO STAE'ETSCAPE ANO STRlKTIJRES • RFDU~rD EXHAUST fRJM DIFSFI TRUCKS USED IN SNUW RFMUVAI • INCREASED ABILITY TO KEEP STRCCr cURNITI iac OUT YEAR ROUND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WALKING SURFACE • REDUCES NEED FOR HAND SHO~+=:. ING • INCREASED VISIBILITY OF PAVING Sl_IRFAC'L • P,L~_'UCCU NEED FOR ;AND AND CINDERS RESULTING IN. LESS TRACSA•tG 4NTG 3SIS7PJESSE: REDUCES MATERIAL; MAINTENAN'. i COSTS • RF"~.iiCED 'Jc.D FOR C. i=i11CAL I}E-ICING • DISADVANTAGES • INITIAL CnPITAL Ci:ST • UTILITY COST VAftid81LTTY • POSSIRLE +FnUCTION OF SNOW COUNTR', C)-I/-RACTER • ENVIl1,C7NFt@f~TAL IMPACTS INCLUDING. • INCf:ElSG FOSSIL FOAL USAGE • COMncST;ON GASEi FtiCF1 SNOW MELT BC711 FR' • POTi.'`+I IAL FOR SNUWME_T S=SEEM FAILURE REQUIRING TP„~G';TONAL SNOW R ~h'.'7`!AL • EXhAl1ST "PLUME" WHIZ F H•=1_'~ r RS ARE OPERATING • MORE FREQUENT WINTER CLEANING W7ULD BE NECESSARY ,,~ ~- ~~ , ~k I ~ 1 ry_ GOLDEN PEAK ~ ~ ~ J .-- /~ ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #4 t ~ ~ ~ SNOWMELT ZONE #5 • TOTAL PROIECI 4REA - 90.000 S.F_ • AREA w~ SNONMEL T ~ 90,000 S.F • AREA w/o SNOWMELT ~ 0 S.F • TOTAL INSTALLATION COST - $2,100,000 - 2,600.000 • TOTAL Y EAn t OPERATION COQ I S $148,500 ct .~~1-E T'YSTEM U'Ti~TI-~AINENAN~ECOST ~~9d,U00 • SM1L-1'~MFI TED WIt•l'. `..C ST4fC:: ~AINI LNANCL COSY : $8 i0d •' tJC-NC~.;n'.v~l_LTEn WINTER iTREET MAINTENANCE r'ncI $ 0 ~I ~~ I ~ _\ ~_i 7// ~ - ' -- _ - -~//ff_'~~ ~~ - - ~`~ .„~;, .. 5L-~FER LI ~~~ ~' ~~ il% ?:.y. > \ ` , ~/ :~ J ~ ~ ~'~ ~, 1 ~~-~_ -~~ ~- -_ ~ ~~~ i.~ ~ J ~ \ \ ~ `~ ~~ y ,~ ~ ~ a~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~- ~ ~_ - I-- ~ 7 i • ADVANTAGES • REDUCES NEED FOR L'LOW(NG RESULTING tN • NOISE REDUCTION • REDUCED ~/.70a AYNr`aR'. CJ i • REDUCED INTERFACE 6E7YVEEV F~QE51-RL{IV itN'O h~A41' EQiAY'1`fEVT • MINIMIZED CONFLICTS BETW[EN SNOWPLOWS AND DELIVERY TRUCKS • REUU: EU PHYSICAL UAMA ;E I O SI REE I St APE ANU CI RUC IURES • RFD! is iD EXHAUST FRV!` DIFSFI TRU(-KS USED IN SNJW RFM VVAI • INCCL:iED ABILITY TC ;[EP SToccr cURNITUP~ OUT YEAR ROUND • SAFER MORE CONSISTENT WALxrr:G SURFACE • REDUCES NEED FOR HAND SHOYEi VG • INCREASED VISIBILITY OF PAVING S'~_IRFAC F. • RE[3t I;-ED NFEEi F±1H SAND AND CINDEkS RESULTING IN: LESS TRACX4NG INTO He75lNE54E*_ • REDUCES MATERIAL ~ MAINTENAN'~. L COSTS • F., L;,Ji FD ~..v,.-D FOk Uic. 'IICAL DbIC IN~_ • DISADVANTAGES • INITIAL ~~. %,PITAL t.uST • UTILITI' ~`7S' V.-0RIABlLlTY • POSSI0.1_E hE[~UCTION OF SNOW COUNTRY CHA?ALTER • ENVtlIVNMENTAL IMPACTS INCLUDING. • N.tEASF1-=FOSSIL Ft1hL USAGC • COMA @;TION GASPS FR .:Nt ;HOWMELT BOIL e U • POTENTIAL FOR SNOWMt_~T SY~FEM FAILURE ~i~I,1U IRING T^.=.D(TIONAL SNOW ReEP(C'+4L • EXf-AI 1ST "PLUME" WHIZ F 3C"_ERS ARE OPERATING • Ni fRf IREQUENT WINTER CLEANING N,4 JIJI I BE NECESSARY ~~ c.IRC.LE ~ 1 _- ~ i...i ~L GOLDEN PEAK v ~~ail village PROPOSED SNOWMELT ZONE #S ail village STREETSCAPE DESIGN Design Matrix Synopsis: The consultant team in conjunction with the Town of Vail project staff would like to propose a means to ascertain the level of improvements desired for public spaces within the Village core. The proposed streetscape improvements would be subdivided into four levels of improvements, each designated by specific objectives. These levels would allow the community, Town project staff, and Town Council to make objective and informed decisions regarding the future of public spaces in the Village Core. The proposed improvements would be assembled in a design matrix through which improvement recommendations and guidelines could be formulated and ensure that everyone involved in the process understands final level of streetscape improvements. The following are the proposed improvement levels: Essential Improvements This level includes restoration of existing materials and features in their current Village configuration or replacement with more durable materials where appropriate with little or no additional cost. No significant changes would be made to the location of existing site elements: walls, planters, features, etc. For example: asphalt streets, drainage improvements, lighting of dark areas, fountain repair, utility repair/replacement, paving surface repair, and resolution of public health, safety, and welfare concerns. The cost of these basic improvements is the minimum baseline expense for the project. 2. Basic Enhancements This level includes modifications to the existing streetscape elements to facilitate long term Village maintenance, improve service and delivery patterns, encourage visitor circulation/access, and enhance appearance in addition to improvements recommended at level one. For example: minor relocation of features /landmarks/ walkways to enhance service /maintenance access and clarify pedestrian circulation (paving upgrades and some integrated art) and removing unnecessary obstacles providing improved opportunities for building access (minor planter and wall changes). 3. Activity Enhancing Improvements This level introduces an additional layer of streetscape modifications to enhance the ability of public spaces to support a greater intensity and variety of pedestrian uses and special events. These improvements, in turn, would be expected to improve retail viability. For example: special paving improvements, more extensive seating, reconfiguring plaza spaces to be more favorable for special events, upgrading lighting systems, banner poles, special art focus points (integrated art), extensive planter changes, specialty paving, and landscape improvements. 4. Image Enhancement This level introduces an additional layer of special place-making features and landmarks that would provide a memorable visitor experience and set Vail apart from other mountain communities. For example: overall public art and sculpture, fire and water features, sound systems, architectural lighting improvements, increased pedestrian connections to other areas within the village core, architectural landmarks, and expansion of retail segment into the public space. Any of these measures could be implemented through public-private partnerships. *Snowmelt in levels 2-4 could include all or part of Village core. 17 Plaza Example: Vail Streetscape Design: Street Connection ' Children s Fountain Earl Eaton Plaza Checkpoint Charlie Sample Design Matrix Example: Wall Street plaza 1. Essential Improvements Paving replacement Fountain and paving repair Relocation of fountain 2. Basic Enhancements Planter relocation sculpture to reduce corrosion and improve service access Relocation of fountain Modification of stairs and sculpture to provide greater 3. Activity Enhancing Improvements terraces intensity and activities; provide venue opportunities for special events Fire and water feature European style cobbled stone adjacent to steps, new lighting paving, a relocated, 4. Image Enhancement systems and seating areas, redesigned water interactive architectural modification to water feature with a warming Arcade Building hearth in the winter Consensus of community for minimum improvements MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager DT: July 31, 2002 RE: FY2003 BUDGET We have scheduled 30 minutes at the worksession to begin discussing with you the Fiscal Year 2003 Budget. Specifically, we will be discussing the proposed budget calendar, the sales tax revenue forecast, and we'll discuss several philosophical issues regarding the potential upcoming property tax election. Perhaps the most important the issue that we should begin discussing at this time is how to deal with the anticipated upcoming election. As we have discussed, the Council has been working to generate an additional $4 million annually. As we have discussed, these funds would be utilized to expand fire service in Vail and to help restore the town's capital projects fund to the 50-50 level anticipated in the town's charter. The fundamental question which needs to be addressed is, should we budget these funds in the expectation that the election will pass; or should we not budget them and assume that either there is no election or the election does not pass. Obviously, this will have a significant impact on how the budget is prepared. Because I believe it is unwise to include these funds prior to the election, it is my intention to prepare the budget without this revenue. In order to balance the budget, it is my intention to continue to spend down the capital projects budget in order to supplement operations. Because this strategy cannot work long term as it is irresponsible to underfund the infrastructure needed of the community, we will need to, in the near future, address this situation. If the election passes, the Council could amend the budget, either prior to adoption or by supplemental ordinance to add the revenue back in. At that time we would also identify the specific capital projects which would be added back into the budget as well. Conversely, if the election fails, the town will not be able to fund infrastructure at a higher level. MEMORANDUM To: Vail Town Council From: Judy Camp Steve Thompson Re: 2003 Budget Proposal Date: August 1, 2002 Sales Tax Revenue One of the most impactful decisions in developing the annual budget is projecting what sales tax will do. Before the 2002 sales tax budget was adopted, Council agreed to reduce the forecast by 10% or 1.5 million. Based on sales tax collections year-to-date, it looks like the town may end the year $500,000 ahead of budget. However, this will still leave. us $1 million short in making up the deficit. Our plan is not to project this $1 million dollar increase in sales tax revenue in the 2003 budget, thus, leaving a ,negative impact on the level of projects budgeted. Budget Philosophy The budget proposal for 2003 will not include any additional revenue from taxes which may be approved in the November 5th election. Department Directors have been given targets of 3% over 2001 actual spending for most line items other than compensation and benefits. The proposed budget will be balanced by eliminating capital projects. If additional revenues are provided by the election, capital projects will be restored. Preparation of a detailed operating budget for 2004 will be delayed until next year due to the potential changes in revenue that may occur as a result of the election. Town of Vail Calendar for 2003 Budget Budget guidelines distributed to departments July 22 Budget briefing for Town Council August 6 Department budgets complete August 16 Commission on Special Events funding request submitted August 16 Deadline for non-profit groups to apply for funding August 16 Town Council decision on election proposals August 20 Departmental budget review meetings -department heads with Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager and Finance September 2-13 Capital projects presented to Town Council September 17 Town Manager's budget is complete September 20 Town Council offsite budget workshop -proposed October 8 Additional decision-making sessions As Needed Budget ordinance first reading (Note: this is also Election Day) November 5 Budget ordinance second reading November 19 Mil levy certification December 15 Budget calender 2003 8/1/02 MEMORANDUM T0: Vail Town Council FR: Judy Camp Steve Thompson RE: Use Tax DT: July 31, 2002 Introduction At the last Council meeting the Town Council asked us to explore the concept of a use tax on building materials. What follows is brief summary of this issue. Use taxes are authorized by the Colorado Statutes. Of the 270 incorporated municipalities in Colorado, 135 levy a use tax. There are three categories of normal use taxes: motor vehicles, building materials, and the use or consumption of tangible personal property purchased at retail. Use tax rates vary from 1.00% to 4.5%. Municipalities in the region that levy a use tax include: Carbondale, Eagle, Gypsum, Glenwood Springs, Rifle, New Castle, and Steamboat Springs. Other Western Slope and Resort communities include: Black Hawk, Central City, Cortez, Crested Butte, Durango, Gunnison and Telluride Definition Generally, use taxes are levied in tandem with a general retail sales tax. Use taxes are complimentary to sales taxes and apply to the storage, use, or consumption of items otherwise subject to the sales tax where the sales tax is not collected. In other words, a use tax is due when Town sales tax has not been paid on the purchase of tangible personal property that is stored, used or consumed within the taxing jurisdiction. QuestionslAnswers Question, How does the use tax work and what is covered? Answer. The use tax is imposed on each person who resides in the Town for the privilege of storing, using, or consuming articles of personal property or taxable services purchased at retail. Typically a use tax applies when the article is purchased outside of Town and brought into Town for use or consumption. Question. How is the use tax collected? Answer. For building materials, the use tax is collected at the time a building permit is issued. Normally, fifty percent of the estimated general contractor costs are deemed to be the sale value of such building materials. Question. How does it affect local businesses? Answer. Use taxes help protect local businesses from persons avoiding local sales taxes by purchasing outside the Town. A use tax tends to reduce the incentive for local businesses to locate outside a taxing jurisdiction so that purchasers can escape the sales tax. Also, a use tax offers a degree of protection to the local merchant whose goods are subject to a sales tax. Question: How much tax revenue will be generated by a use tax? Answer: Assuming a 4% use tax, for building materials we estimate this tax would generate $1.8 million. This is based building activity last year. Question: How is a use tax implemented? Answer. A use tax, like other taxes must approved by the voters. ('.nnrlucinn We believe the use tax is a viable option for the Council to consider. However, given the political and practical considerations, we must select either the use tax or the property tax to go forward in November. 2 ;- CSI I~ '~~C~ir~ c~ ~~ ORDINANCE NO. 19 SERIES 2002 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS REGARDING THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, it is the Town Council's opinion that the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the Town of Vail, and the wildlife indigenous to this valley, would be enhanced and promoted by the adoption of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, maintaining a sustainable wildlife and bear population in the Vail Valley depends upon minimizing human conflicts with bears and other forms of wildlife; and WHEREAS, The Council finds that the feeding of wildlife within the Town of Vail constitutes a menace to property and to the health, welfare, peace and safety of the citizens of Vail; and WHEREAS, human refuse provides an abundant yet unhealthy supply of food for wildlife, which supports artificially high populations and places an additional strain on the supply of naturally occurring foods; and WHEREAS, reported human-bear conflicts have dramatically increased over the past twelve (12) months; and WHEREAS, adopting regulations for proper storage of food or refuse edible by bears and other forms of wildlife has been proven to reduce conflicts between humans and wildlife. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, that: Title 5 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended by the addition of Chapter 9, "Wildlife Protection," to read as follows: Section 1. Purpose The purpose of this Chapter 9 is to protect and maintain wildlife in the Town of Vail and surrounding areas and to minimize the risk of dangerous interaction between humans and wildlife. Section 2. Definitions A. Wildlife -Any undomesticated animal, including but not limited to elk, deer, sheep, lynx, skunks, squirrels, bears, raccoons, coyotes, beavers, porcupines, mountain lions, bobcats and foxes. B. Resident -Any person, firm, corporation or organization within the Town of Vail or on Town controlled land. Section 3. Residential Refuse Disposal A. All residential refuse containers that receive garbage and/or refuse edible by wildlife must be secured in a manner that does not create an attraction for wildlife. B. Residents with curbside pickup shall place their refuse containers at the curb, alley, or public right-of-way only on the morning of pickup. After pickup, the containers must be re- secured inside the home, garage or Refuse Storage Room by 7:00 p. m. C:\windows\temp\Ordinace19.doc Section 4. Special Event Refuse Disposal Outdoor special event sites shall be kept free from the accumulation of refuse edible by wildlife. Refuse must be collected from the grounds at the close of each day's activities and shall be deposited in appropriate containers or enclosures or be removed to an appropriate disposal site. Section 5. Construction Site Refuse Disposal All construction sites must have a designated container that receives refuse edible by wildlife. This container shall be a container that is emptied at the end of each workday and then securely stored inside a trailer or building. Section 6. Feeding of Wildlife Prohibited A. No person shall intentionally or unintentionally feed or provide food in any manner for wildlife on public or private property within the Town of Vail. A person will be considered to be in violation of this ordinance if they leave or store any garbage, refuse or food product in a manner that would create an attraction for wildlife. B. No person shall leave or store any refuse, food product, pet food, grain or salt in a manner which would constitute a lure, attraction or enticement for wildlife. C. Bird feeders are allowed. However between the dates of April 15th and November 15th, all bird feeders must be suspended on a cable or other device so that they are inaccessible to bears and the area below the feeders must be kept free from the accumulation of seed debris. D. Exceptions: This regulation shall not apply to: 1) Any individual, company or corporation that is duly licensed by the State of Colorado or otherwise entitled under law posses a wildlife species; 2) Any action that is officially sanctioned by the State of Colorado that would require feeding, baiting, or luring of wildlife. (An example of one such action would be scientific projects dealing with capturing and tagging wildlife); 3) the feeding of wild birds, unless the bird feed begins to attract other forms of wildlife. Section 7. Enforcement A. Town of Vail Police and Code Enforcement officers shall have the power to issue a warning notice or a summons and complaint to any person in violation of this Chapter 9. B. Any enforcement officer shall have the right to enter any premises in the Town of Vail at reasonable hours to inspect property concerning any potential wildlife attractant and to enforce the provisions of this Chapter. Section 8. Penalty Assessment Violation of any provision of this chapter by any person, firm or corporation, whether as owner or occupant, shall be handled in the following manner: A. First Violation: The first violation of this Chapter will result in a Notice of Violation to an alleged offender. The alleged offender will be warned and informed of the proper precautions necessary to prevent the feeding of wildlife and the necessary actions to meet the provisions of this Chapter, which may include but are not limited to: removal of wildlife attractants, time limits for the placement of curbside refuse containers, and use of bear resistant refuse containers. Said notice shall include a reasonable time schedule for C:\windows\temp\Ordinace19.doc compliance. An alleged offender who timely complies with the first Notice of Violation will not be subject to the penalty provisions of this Chapter. B. Second Violation: The second violation of this Chapter will result in another Notice of Violation, as well as a Summons and Complaint. Two Notices of Violation within a twelve (12),month period will subject the violator to the penalty provisions of this Chapter. Failure to comply with the first Notice of Violation within the designated time frame may be deemed a second violation. The second Notice of Violation shall include a compliance schedule when applicable. C. Subsequent Violation(s): Offenders who have violated this Chapter more than two times within a twelve (12) month period or continue to fail in achieving timely compliance with a previous notice will be subject to a graduated fine schedule as set forth herein. Section 9. Penalties A. The graduated fine schedule for the penalty assessment procedure is as follows: Warning for the first violation. $100 to $250 fine for the second violation within twelve (12) of the first violation, or failure to comply with the designated compliance schedule associated with the first violation. $250 to $999 fine for each successive violation within twelve (12) months of a second violation, or failure to comply with the designated compliance schedule associated with the second or subsequent violation. B. Any Town of Vail Police or Code Enforcement Officer shall have the authority to issue Notices of Violation, summonses and complaints for violation of any provision of this Chapter. C. In addition to the criminal enforcement set forth above, The Town of Vail may seek injunction, mandamus, or other appropriate civil relief to enforce the provisions of this Chapter. Section 10. Violator's Responsibilities In addition to the penalties outlined herein, violator's will be required to perform all necessary actions to remove or abate attractants of wildlife. This may include, but shall not be limited to: the removal of bird feeders or pet food, cleaning or appropriate storage of barbeque grills, and/or the required use of wildlife resistant containers and/or wildlife proof containers. Section 11. Notice of Violation A resident shall be deemed to have been issued an appropriate Notice of Violation if it is personally served upon the resident, posted on the resident's premise, or placed in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and addressed to the resident according to the last known address given by the resident to any Town of Vail or Eagle County government department. If the identity of the resident is not known, the entity responsible for payment of the garbage removal services for the subject location will be held responsible for complying with this Chapter and for any penalties assessed pursuant to the same. C:\windows\temp\Ordinace19.doc Section 12. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 13. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 14. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 15. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. , INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of August, 2002 and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 20th day of August, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk C:\windows\temp\Ordinace19.doc READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 20th day of August, 2002 Ludwig Kurz, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk C:\windows\temp\Ordinace19.doc Department of Police ro~tiv Memorandum To: Town Council From: Dwight Henninger, Chief of Police ivlatt Lindvall, Police 0~cer Date: June 2~, 2002 Subject: Bear Issues The Town of Vail is located in prime habitat for black bears and other species of wildlife. T'ne town and our community have always taken pride in protecting our environment and our citizens. Over the past few years, the incidents of black bear and human conflicts have growr_ substantiaii_v. Bern-een mid April and the first week of June 2001, the Vail Police Department responded to -? i calls for service due to bear-human conflicts. For the same period in 2002, we responded to l:s calls for the same service, a 285% increase. The areas for bear calls for service in the past rears have been primarily the Intermountain area and south of Vail Village from the Forest Road neighborhood to the Sunburst Drive area. This year, we have been called to all areas in Vaii on both sides of Interstate 70. The lone exception is Spraddle Creek. They have an excellent ztiildlife mitigation regulation within their private homeowners rules and regulations and may be used as a model for future successes. v The increase in bear calls may be the result of many factors. One determining factor is the wrought conditions in Colorado for the past rive years. This has caused the bears and other wildlife to search for alternatives to natural food sources. Bears have found food in our communirv in the forms of trash, bird feeders, pet food, and in some cases domestic plants. Bears are omnivorous creatures and will eat almost anything. Bears are very intelligent and will return regularly to locations where they have found food sources in the past. The many bears in our area have learned from birth that humans provide a great source for food. Presently bears are going from home to home searching for food that humans have provided either unintentionally or intentionally. Our current bear population has become very accustomed to humans. which many experts believe increases the risk of more serious conflicts. In the same manner, our citizens have also become more accustomed to the bears and because of familiarity have done things they would never imagine of doing with "wild bears.'' The police department has gone to great lengths to educate our citizens on their role in reducing the risk of conflicts with bears. We have also purchased a pepper ball launcher that shoots a paint ball- type round which delivers a kinetic impact, and then O.C. spray. This negative reinforcement is effective, but will not greatly reduce the problem in the long term. Relocation of bears is not a viable option. Division of Wildlife records show that at least 80 percent of relocated bears are killed due to their two-strikes policy. Division of Wildlife's strict two-strike policy states that if a bear is relocated and is once again problematic, it is killed. We as a police department and a community have reviewed the steps and successes of other communities in dealing with the situation. We believe in order to protect the wildlife and our citizens, w-e need to consider more proactive steps. Some citizens have taken active steps to resolve interaction problems, but unfortunately other have not, which causes problems for the whole community. Staff recommends that the Town of Vail enact new ordinances to reduce tl~ie amount of conflicts with bears and other wildlife. Today staff is requesting directives from council in drafting ordinances to address these problems. The first, being a stronger set of laws, that requires all residences and businesses to have wildlife proof containers and enclosures similar to those enacted in Aspen and Pitken County. The negative of this route is the costs associated with the enclosures for everyone. v A more reactive phased approach would be to require that residents utilizing curbside service for trash pick-up, put the trash out only on the day of pickup and bring in on the same day of service. This would refereed to as a dawn-to-dusk ordinance. r Staff is additionally recommending an ordinance addressing locations that have a demonstrated problem, such as a bear visit. This ordinance would require that if a person, residence or business .provides a food source unintentionally or intentionally that attracts wildlife, it would be deemed a nuisance and would be removed upon order from the Town of Vail, within thirty days, if unintentional. The responding personnel would leave a warning notice with information on ho~v to remove the nuisance. If the incident was deliberate, the source would have to be removed immediately. If there is a second call due to a wildlife visit, the offender could be summons for a violation of town code. This ordinance would require the violator to obtain a wildlife proof container, an enclosure 'for the trash, or the removal of the nuisance. The last phase of this option is to have all trash service providers supply their customers wildlife- resistant containers within rivo years of enactment of these ordinances. All citizens would be required to have wildlife-resistant trash containers. This would include either privately purchased trash containers or containers provided by trash haulers. This would apply to both curbside service and all dumpster service. Recently, Cordillera enacted a community wide ordinance of this type for residences. Staff feels these options will greatly reduce these problems and protect the environment and our community. Staff believes that many of these suggestions have a secondary benefit. Some of these ordinances would reduce the time trash sits on our public streets, which causes litter and is aesthetically unappealing. The appearance of buildings as it relates to trash storage near and inside commercial and multi-unit residential buildings would improve. - PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS Monday, July 22, 2002 PROJECT ORIENTATION / -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT John Schofield Erickson Shirley Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill George Lamb Rollie Kjesbo Gary Hartman Site Visits 1:00 pm ... - ----:..___ _ 1 Vail Mnianta~n Srh~nl_.- 3150 N_Fmnta~}e. Rd,.Fast . ~- __ _ _ __ 2. Antlers - 680 W. Lionshead Place 3. Donovan Park - 1600 S. Frontage Rd. West Driver: George s~ NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, to allow for time share units on the first floor of a building or above, located at the Antlers Condominiums, 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead 3~d Filing. Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Rob Levine Planner: George Ruther/Warren Campbell MOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Rollie Kjesbo VOTE: 6-1 (Lamb opposed) APPROVED WITH THREE CONDITIONS that Units 318, 321, 417, 418, 420 & 520 as quarter-share time-share units, with any unit sold as a whole unit revoking the conditional use status for that respective unit. 1. That the Antlers Condominium Association meets the "Time-share Units Disclosure Requirements" outlined in Chapter 4, Section 4, A_ rticle A, of the Vail Town Code, prior to the marketing of the time-share units. 2. That the Antlers Condominium Association provides the Town of Vail Community Development Department with copies of deeds for the units sold as time-share units within 10 days of the real estate transaction for each respective time-share unit. 3. That the Antlers Condominium Association continues to manage the project with an on- site front desk operating twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, providing reservation and registration capabilities, so long as time-share units exist in the building. M~~ ~ TOWN OF PAIL ~ 2. Arequest for a final review and recommendations of the following applications related to the proposed redevelopment of the Vail Mountain School: 1) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to rezone 3010 Booth Falls Road/Lot 11, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing from Two-Family Residential to General Use; 2) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to Zone Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing to General Use, The northern portion of this lot is zoned Agriculture Open Space; 3) A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to rezone Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing from Two-Family Residential to General Use; 4) A request for a recommendation to amend the official Town of Vail Land Use Map for Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing from Low Density Residential to Public/Semi-Public; 5) A request for an amendment to the previously approved development plan and a new conditional use permit for a private educational institution and an active outdoor recreation area on 3010 Booth Falls Road/Lot 11, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing and 3160 N. Frontage Road East/ Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing; 6) A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of eight Type III EHUs located on Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing; . 71 A.rep~tPSt f~r.a for a conditional use aerm_ it to allow for temporary modular classroom _ _ ..... _. ,. ~ structures located at 3160, N. Frontage Rd. East/ a part of Lot 12, 131ock 2, Vail Village 11 . ' ' Filing; .. _ - ~...... y . , 8) A request fora recommendation to the Vail Town Council to modify the official Town of Vail Rockfall Hazard Map to indicate approved mitigation for 3160 N. Frontage Road/Lot 12, Block 2, and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filling; 9) A request for a major subdivision in accordance with Title 13, Chapter 3, Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regards thereto, located at Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing and Tract C, Block 1, Vail Village 12th Filing. Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Russ Forrest WORKSESSION - NO VOTE 3. Arequest for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council to amend Donovan Park Master Plan and a request for a final review of an amendment for the previously approved development plan, to allow for the construction of the Donovan Park Pavilion, located at 1600 S. Frontage Rd. West/Unplatted Donovan Park. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by VAg, Inc. Planner: George Ruther MOTION: Chas.Bernhardt SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 5-2 (Schofield and Shirley opposed) APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: That the applicant submits a complete Design Review Board application to the Town of Vail Community Department for review and approval by the Town of Vail Design Review Board, prior to making application for a building permit for the community park pavilion. 4. Arequest for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of an amendment to Section 12-7A-7 (Height), Vail Town Code, to increase the maximum allowable building height in the Public Accommodation Zone District. Applicant: Bob Lazier, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 12, 2002 5. A request for a variance from Sections 12-14-7 (Setback from Watercourse) and 12-15-5C5 (Guideline Compliance), Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition within the 50 ft. Gore Creek setback and to allow for the continuance of anon-conforming driveway, located at 5175 Black Gore Drive, Unit B-1/Cedar Point Townhomes Filing 2. Applicant: John Welaj; represented by Mike Suman Planner: Allison Ochs WITHDRAWN 6. Approval of July 8, 2002 minutes 7. Information Update The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. - •._ Cjnn I~c}nj innn in}nrnrn~~~ini~! -+y'+il~ahln ~ _nnn rcn~ ~cac+ ~niith '7/l hni it nri+ifir~tinn. Plaaep.nall d7G- ~ ~ ' _. _:•_ _ ___ ._, _ ?.35~, TPlPphone fnr the HPannn Imna~rQd.. for_nfc-rm~fion. .. _ ~ .' __.. _. .. ,._._. _, Community Development Department 3 L DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC WELCOME PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Clark Brittain Bill Pierce Hans Woldrich Charlie Acevedo Margaret Rogers SITE'VISITS ~ ~ ~ ~ ' _. - 1. Hoffman residence - 2665 Bald Mountain Road ~ ~~ 2. Kelton residence - 1034 Homestake Circle 3. Vail Mountain Lodge - 352 E. Meadow Drive 4. Vail Run - 1000 Lionsridge Loop 5. Robason residence - 1139 Sandstone Drive 6. Marriott - 715 West Lionshead Circle 7. Alphorn - 121 West Meadow Drive Driver: Warren PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm 1. Hoffman residence DR602-01741 Allison Final review of a proposed primary/secondary residence 2665 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 9, Block 2, Vail Village 13th Filing Applicant: Scott Hoffman, represented by RKD Architects MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0 CONSENT APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS: 1. That, prior to the submittal of a building permit, the staff review and approve the detail of the stone & facia. 2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant submit revised plans which meet all Public Works conditions. 2. Johnson/Porter residence DRB02-0175 Allison Final review of proposed addition and exterior modifications 4857 Juniper Lane/Lot 8, Block 4, Bighorn ,5th Addition Applicant: Jeff Johnson, represented by Gwathmey, Pratt Schultz Architects MOTION: Charlie Acevedo SECOND: Margaret Rogers VOTE: 5-0 I'OWA' OF PAIL ~i' 1 APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION: That prior to the issuance of a building permit, all staff issues shall be resolved by the applicant. 3. Vail Mountain Lodge DRB02-0185 George Final review of amendment to approved plans revising the dormers on the north and east sides of the building 352 E. Meadow Drive/Tract B, Vail Village 1St Filing Applicant: VML, LLC MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED PER PLANS SUBMITTED AND DATED 7/17/02 4. Robason residence DRB02-0163. Matt Final review of new single family residence. 1139 Sandstone Drive, Indian Creek Townhomes/Lot A1, Block A, Lions Ridge Filing 1. _ n 1-., a_. .. r~~....J~e rl Q rlrnn•• [J..hn.•nn -anr~con}f,rl h~~ C}n~i.tn ~,?.mOC p rdc+n ,. M~TI(lly;:$III Piarra ---. . _ ---. -SF(`.O~lf)• F-lang 1/\/nlrlrirh _ \/f~TF; Fi=Q ' APPROVED WITH 4 CONDITIONS: 1. That the lot subdivision process be completed. 2. That the applicant meet all Public Works conditions. 3. That the applicant meet all landscape requirements. 4. That the application be staff reviewed and approved. 5. Alphorn Condominiums DRB02-0164 Allison Final review of fagade remodel 121 West Meadow Drive/Lot D2, Vail Village 2"d Filing Applicant: Alphorn Condo Assoc., represented by Ray Story MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0 CONSENT APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS: 1. That prior to the submittal of a building permit, the applicant provide revised plans which indicate the center stairway roof match the other 2 pitches. 2. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant coordinate with Public Works with regards to Meadow Drive improvements. 6. Vail Run Resort DR602-0216 Matt Final review of minor alterations to proposed staircase 1000 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 10, Block C, Lions Ridge Filing 1. Applicant: Vail Run Resort Community Assoc., represented by RKD Architects MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED WITH 3 CONDITIONS: 1. That staff approve the materials to be used. 2. That the site be cleaned up to staffs satisfaction, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. That the landscape plan be approved by staff. 2 7. Kelton residence DRB02-0193 Bill Final review of proposed color change. 1034 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th Filing Applicant: Piper Architecture LTD MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0 CONSENT APPROVED 8. Marriott Vail Mountain Resort DR602-0229 George Final review of proposed changes to approved plans 715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots C&D, Morcus Subdivision Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Architects MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Margaret Rogers VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED PER REVISED PLANS DATED 7/17/02 9. Ryerson residence DRB02-0196. Bill . Conceptual review of proposed addition. .- - ~•~ • ~"' ' ~4~SJy iVieduuVV Ufiv~I~Ut ``ci,-t~w~ri u; L711~.I 1U111 ~JUUUIVIJIVl1.-T:- _.-~s__.~ _. _. Hppncarit.r-.._.__Toriy & Cirruy Ryei~suil, reNiG~clliCU uy E'ictll r_cvine; Arcl-~~tact CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 10. Meadow Drive Streetscape DR602-0195 Bill Final review of proposed streetscape improvements Meadow Drive from Dobson Ice Arena to Willow Bridge Road Applicant: Town of Vail MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0 TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 7, 2002 11. Donovan Park Pavilion DRB02-0181 George Final review of proposed new park pavilion 1600 S. Frontage Rd. West/Unplatted, Donovan Park Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by VAg, Inc. MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0 TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 7, 2002 Staff Denials Baggage Cheque, Inc, DRB02-0096 Sale banner 141 E. Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1St Filing Applicant: Colleen McCarthy Staff Approvals Candi Johns Salon DRB02-0201 Hanging sign 141 E. Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1St Filing Applicant: Candi Johns Salon George Warren 3 Parks residence DRB02-0203 New single-family residence with Type I EHU 4166 Columbine Drive/Lot 18, Bighorn Subdivision Applicant: Timothy Parks Ace Workwear DR602-0200 New awning sign 2171 N. Frontage Road West/Lot 2-A, Vail das Schohe Filing 3 Applicant: Judith A. Gifford Sanctuary International Inc DRB02-0176 Window addition in basement 4327 Streamside Circle/Lot 6, Bighorn 4th Addition Applicant: Roger P. Anderson George Warren Allison Wolf residence DRB02-0206 Allison Window addition _. C'nl~istrpam (;nnrinc 1 d7F \n/pctha~ipn. (lriyp/~ 4t ~,'~_ .(plan I ~~pn SI!bdi~/ICnn . _,_ Applicant: ~_ Andrevv.M.. Wolf.--~-~, _ __ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ • . - Shapiro residence DRB02-0207 Allison Replace deck and railing Columbine North, 2773 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Rabbit & Son Enterprises TKL Properties LLC residence DRB02-0208 Allison Replace deck and railing Columbine North, 2773 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Rabbit & Son Enterprises Moore residence DRB02-0209 Replace deck and railing Columbine North, 2773 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Rabbit & Son Enterprises Rossman/Eastom residence DRB02-0210 Replace deck and railing Columbine North, 2773 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Rabbit & Son Enterprises Spaeth/Tawczynski residence DRB02-0211 Replace deck and railing Columbine North, 2773 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Rabbit & Son Enterprises W/A Family Trust residence DR602-0212 Replace deck and railing Columbine North, 2773 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Rabbit & Son Enterprises Rogers residence DR602-0213 Addition of 221 sq. ft. 860 Red Sandstone Drive, Unit 23/Potato Patch Club Condominiums Applicant: Rosalin Rogers Allison Allison Allison Allison Warren 4 Mill Race Phase I DRB02-0221 Warren Change to approved plan -change to location of fence surrounding pool 1360 Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village Area A Applicant: Millrace Condo Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects Ruder Cemetary DRB02-0225 Judy Repair and clean-up site 2850 Basingdale Blvd./Lot 1, Block 9, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Calder Cahill Lapadula residence DRB02-0220 George Replace window with slider Vail Point Townhomes Phase 1, 1881 Lions Ridge Loop/Lot 1, Block 3, Lion's Ridge Filing 3 Applicant: Daniel & Marsha Lapadula La Bottega DRB02-0214 George Installation of exterior louvers d Vail Village Inn Plaza, 100 E. Meadow Drive/Lot.O, Block 5D,-Vail Village 1St Filing Snowstorm LLC DR602-0222 Install air conditioner compressor 2009 Sunburst Drive/Lot 15, Vail Valley 3~d Filing Applicant: Snowstorm LLC George Marriott DR602-0218 Warren Change to approved plans -exterior building arches from chamfered to arched 715 W. Lionshead Circle/Morcus Subdivision Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, represented by Grathmey Pratt Schultz The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356,Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 5