Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004-04-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
TO1~N COUNCIL !~!lORK SESSION AGENDA 2:00 P.Afl. TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 2004 1. Warren Campbell ITEM/TOPIC: Site Visit out by Manor Vail, Request to proceed through the development review process with a proposal to perform landscaping improvements, relocated a public easement and construct private improvements on Town of Vail property (30 min.) 2. Bill Gibson ITENA/TOPIC: Site Visit out by Glen Lyon Subdivision. Appeal of the March 8, 2004, Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) approval of a request for a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels. This variance request is associated with Vail Resorts Development's snowcat access . relocation proposal (30 min.) 3. Lorelei Donaldson ITEiI~/TOPIC: Interviews for a vacancy for the Design Review Pam Brandmeyer Board (DRB) position left by David Viele, who was appointed to Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) last week. (10min.) o Sherry Dorward o Diana Mathias 4. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: DRB/PEC Update (10 min) 5. Stan Zemler ITEI~V/TOPIC: Urban Land Institute (ULI) Follow-Up (15 min.) 6. Todd Oppenheimer ITEi~I/TOPIC: East Meadow Drive Streetscape update (10 min.) ACTION REC~UESTED OF COUNCIL: None 13ACC4GROUND RATIONALE: Streetscape Improvements in the area of East Meadow Drive between Vail Road and Willow Bridge Road have been contemplated for the past three years. Design of the streetscape improvements has been intermittent depending on the progress and schedule of the adjacent redevelopment proposals. The East Meadow Drive area was included in the Streetscape Master Plan Addendum, adopted November.4, 2003, and a Draft Final Design will be ready for final public comment and incorporation into the construction documents being prepared by the Sonnenalp Properties redevelopment designers by mid April. See attached plan. The Town Council has included funding of the Town's share of the East Meadow Drive streetscape improvements in the 2004 Capital Improvements Plan. Construction of the Sonnenalp Properties redevelopment will begin Fall 2004 or Spring 2005. Streetscape construction will be included in the redevelopment schedule. Staff has been requested to present the Draft Final Design to the East Meadow Merchants for review and comment. This meeting , is tentatively planried for the week of April 12, 2004. The Town Council and/or the Streetscape Design Committee is invited to attend. Final comments will be documented and incorporated into the final design as appropriate. The final design will a turned over to the Sonnenalp Properties designers for incorporation into the construction documents. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Provide any desired comments or direction to staff regarding the final design and public process for the East Meadow Drive Streetscape Improvements. 7. Gregg Barrie ITEM/TOPIC: Renovation of Pirateship Park Playground (20 min.) Todd Oppenheimer ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approval of Proposed Site Plan for final design work, preparation of construction documents, and final pricing. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Per the direction provided by the Town Council on December 16, 2003, Staff has prepared a Site Plan for Pirateship Park. The plan includes an area for swings as requested and also recommends low level lighting to improve safety and security. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Proposed Site Plan as submitted with swings and lighting recommendations. 8. Stan Zemler ITEM/TOPIC: Re-Visit Mission, Vision, Goals (30 min.) 9. ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update (5 min.) 10. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor and Council (5 min.) 11. Adjournment (4:45 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 2 P.M. TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2004 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 6 P.M. TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2004, IN VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS ' Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 2 P.M. TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2004 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 6 P.M. TUESDAY; APRIL 20, 2004, IN VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. IVIEIVIORANDUNI TO: Town Council FROM: .Community Development Department DATE: April 6, 2004 'SUBJECT: :Request to proceed through the development review process with a proposal toperform landscaping ;improvements, relocated a public easement and construct privateimprovements oh Town of Vail :property. .Applicant: Manor Vail, represented by Melick and Associates `Planner: Warren Campbell :I. ~®ESCRIPTION OI= THE REQUEST Request •to ,proceed through the development review process with aproposal -to perform landscaping ,improvements, relocated a public easement and construct private improvements on Town of Vail ,property. III. ;BACKGROUND RATIONAL .It is the desire of .Manor Vail -.Resort to ,.apply for aandscaping improvements .to the tennis court site along Vail Valley Drive, relocate the existing pedestrian easement leading from Vail Valley ;Drive ~to 'Ford Park, and to ;construct ;private :improvements within Town .property :along Gore rCreek in conjunction with ~their'Special !Develo,prrient :District (SDD) application. Manor VailResort has applied for the creation of SDD ::#38 ~to allow for the redevelopment of -their ,property. The applicant has been before both :the `Planning and Environmental `Commission and the Design Review Board several times for work sessions and conceptual reviews. The design of .project has not yet been finalized, but 'in .general the applicant is asking to: :Exceed the allowable Gross Residential Floor Area Exceed :the maximum number of dwelling units o :Exceed the maximum height of 48 feet :Relocate the existing pedestrian :access .easement across Manor Vail property leading to Ford Park Construct private improvements on Town owned land along the Gore Creek and the :rear of Building C ~- Allow for encroachments of new construction into several required setbacks Utilize the Town owned tennis court for stage of materials As a part of •the SDD review process the P arming and Environmental Commission must find that the applicant's .proposal for increased development potential is balanced with ,proposed ,public benefits which outweigh the adverse effects of recommending approval of the SDD. The applicant is :proposing to improve the existing tennis .court site and 'Mill Creek with landscaping and stream bank improvements. The applicant :proposes to repair the tennis courts =as they are currently in need of repair. This repair would occur after their use as a staging area :for the proposed Manor Vail •improvements. In addition, •the applicant is •proposing ~to relocate the pedestrian :path :leading from Vail Valley 'Drive to ;Ford Park, which if eventually approved would require the creation of a new easement. All of :these improvements will 'be occurring on Town owned land and would be utilized :by he applicant to satisfy the public benefit requirement associated with an SDD application. Since Manor Vail Resort is proposing to construct and alter .Town of Vail property, Town Council permission is required to proceed through the development review .process. If Council grants permission to proceed through the process the applicant will need ~to proceed forward .with their Planning and Environmental Commission and Design :Review 'Board applications. The review process for creating a new SDD requires the Planning and .Environmental Commission to forward a recommendation of approval or denial :to the Council. 'If Council were to approve the SDD it would .require two ;public •readings of an ordinance to establishing the SDD. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department .recommends that the Town Council give Manor Vail Resort and their representative further direction on this matter to :proceed through the design review.process. IV. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map _ B. Letter from the applicant C. Conceptual .plans for the proposed landscaping improvements to Town property and the construction on Town property , ~ ~ t ;-~-..rs , ~a~~ ~ _ _ I - - ~ ~ .~ ~~ ,, ; !'~~'~~' ~'~ "r -_ ~'~ r~ ~~ `~ ~ ~ - ~ - - Manor Vail Proposed SDD ~. '`.. f ~ ~• `~~~ ~ ~,ti,~ ~ ~:~'~~~ ~ ~ Vail Town Council April 6, 2004 ~~~ ~, I ti, ~~ ~~ ~u ~~ ,-=:r~ , ~ , ~ ~: _ P''Y ~~p,; ,.,~ : }~ ~ f "~ p~~''~?yc~~ - j~l.`.' ~~~ ~ ~+ r `~Y.~L ~ 4~L-.- y .~• _ ~1 m ~ ''"` F ' - ~~ ~~ ~~ t ! ~ 1~~1,_ - _ S FRONTgGE l R +Y. 1 ~.\y~. ~(` P~ ~ ~If.~ ~. ,~' "' _ i."#'r~ - ~ ~ ~ i 7 r' , .fir v.z~ ' •$ - ~.-.. '~ 4 4 ~ C ~ ~~~i.y 3 t 1 j ~ ~ . H ~ ~4 x ~f~i~?~`~ ~ - y~ ~` ~y~ • i.(: x \ ~ t fir. ~ 7~ ~ _. ~1]t~ r.~^ I ; ' ~b.r,, .r.~+~ ~y'X~ ~, y - ~.^~ ~~~'~~ f " 't py. ~j>~ ~ ~ j } '.F rF ~ ~ ~~'7C:'. Y~~ ~~x ~ . t ~ yl~ ~ ~.. L- ' ~ ~:'r1 ! ~~~ f ~~~ ~~{~, ~ ~~ A t ~ %j~, A J, y rL .,1_ ~ ~ -'.:.~-~, t~ .''TTT' ~ 3~''~h t~+'~ f ;~ '~ , ~.. ~~ k~ '.. ~' '~°... ~t Wyk ~~,_ ~~• ~, a~u?~~.~'- t ~y, i. _ °~ ~ ~~ r ~ ~, i i _ ~ ~i~ ~~~ ~~~'~ -- '.1I •~~~ ~.ii 11_ ~ i ~' Y ~ ~~~f~ ~ ~E„. '~~ '.. ~'~ ~ t ~~.~ '~' t +~~caf~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~+"~ A+."'^~,~ ~-_' -. 'i: ti _ ,1 br ~i! r~'~~ r _ f~. ~--4~F ~ ~ ' D .~ r.- r _ , f T ,, f. ~„`~f" ~ 'u "''f~ ~ ~ ~ a A ~ y `3 c4'~ ~ji ~ ~~ h~ j „~ , ~ j ~~~~~~~,~R ~ r a 1 ' r Y ` 3 ~/fir .~;; ~4i'. }~• ~/.qIL y'T!~.-~ ,`;4~~~ *7` _.~_~, ~ i a .'~}t Lr '~~~~ ,~¢~` ~ ' ~1,~ '?`~ '~4! ~"~1~,~~~~i'#1+i"~ .` .. ~~,' ~ 1}-~~ ' „ 3 ~ '~, _ ~ c :`rryif, ,, .~AL~EY pR ~ 'a ~ ~~~'~~~ {"Y~I ::;~ 3~~' j ~~. :,~}*rc:dii ~,i _~ i", 's ~° `~~`,~~, `t "--~+4 ° t <:.~,F^; s ~ s"~i1R~ ~' ~..: ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 '~ .~: ~~ fc" ;~'!!,~ a ~~ ~` ! /~ , ~ ~" ~'. +'~ D z~' ~~t ~~j~, ~r f~_ ~~' I~ ~ t~ i ~ ~~ S~ ~ # :i:r ~~ zsA'~~[n }r '~~1kt f~^^l~~?~~ ~' ~,~ ~'~~ f 'i t ry.' ~ 1 r ~ .t~ F~ 1~ h. _..• T y.. ~ r '{ ~' E+L f rTi 1 Y ~ ~ •. C s Fc v ~ ~ ~~4 r~ ~;J _,~ -'n ~' ~` ~ Z' flt ~T ~~~ -~ ~. vi'~~ ~- ~~,t ~~>> ~ " '31~..~ ' ~ e i ~F,~ '~ ` r`,.-~7 n ~~'~ w1 J, .~ ~ 1.~. ~CjS L1 I,..~~~r ~r `a~~~ +~ .,~i,. ~„ 1~+ E i ~-n *i~ ,3 I , {a 4341 is t ;- ..:~ j ~ ~71 };~ ,'rt fy ~ ry..y~ ~ + T 4~~a .~ n'r'§, f ~` y ~t~r x `~~~t ~ ~ _ ~ ~f-`KV ~~s~~ -. ~n~rM1 r ;~,.~n ~ °. ~ f Y T a ''~~~~ffff ^F~ 't ~ T "'~- r ti ~. ~ 4 ~ ~~, •„ t~f~~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~A ~ ~-,_ ~ ~~ ~ Y ' Cam` . ~ ~/p, - ~. ~~} R C ~_ ~ 1 G0 0 100 200 Feet ~ Y ~ +~ ~' ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ '~ 1 = 250 - ''~,~ .~ 33 ,a N i ~' -, '' ~~ ~' ~ *_ ~~,~ t~~. T :~ ,~,., ~ , , ~ ~ ~.~ -, ~ .,~' ~ '~.~'~ .~ 1' 3 . +' ~ ~. 4 ~ ' ,~,." ~ !~ , '° 7 ~; Y . r ` , t 4 "~ ~M .E L d C 'K ~A 5 S ~O C ~I A T .E S~ 'I N C M'r._--Warren Garn;pbell Town of Ua~il - Corn.rnunity ~Deveao:p~rne~n't `RE: :Manor Ua'i~l Lodge -Town ~Counci Meeting ;Dear`\Narren: The 'Manor `Vaia ',Lodge ,proposes to .provide public ,benefit to the Town of Ua°i'l by upgrading the appearance and use of the property between .Chalet Drive and Mial Creek that accommodates two existingtennis .courts. The upgrade wi 1include the fohlowing: • A :new aPignment to 'Ford 'Park to'begin at 'the intersecfiion of 'Chalet :Drive and Uail Ua~lley ,Drive ;providingdirect access :th'roug'h the:Manor Ua~il =Lodge ga~r.dens to >FordPark. This anew"alignment se;pa~rates the ;pedestrians from the vehicular •acces~s to ;t!he p rope rty. ~. Newaandscape'bet'ween'Uail°Ual'ley Drive and the tennis :courts to visually integrate =the .re,a~l~ignment with the new ;gardens on the Manor 1/ail Lodge ;property .along 'with a new ;pedestrian =.bridge ~ove r ~M i I I C re e:k. ".• ;Landscape and ~upg~rade'the .appearance of Mi'li '.Creek :between the tennis'cou~rts and .the ;gardens. " • Landscape and ~wpgrade the appearance of _the'bufferbetween Chalet Drive and thetenniscourts. • Landscape and upgrade ache appearance of -the buffer ~~between the Texas Town homes ;park-ing plot and the tennis courts. • Provide new 'poc'ket ;paths behind :Building D & :F .at the Gore Creek. • -Other 25107 GENESEETRAIL•RD A R C~H'I T E C T~U R E SUITE ONE HUNDRED ONE I:N T'E R I 0"R S GOLDEN CO 8040'1 .. ~~ PL A~N N I N G TEL 303.534.1930 Attachment: B ~~ <WWW.MEL'ICK.COM FAX 303.534.1~93~1 I o Cantilever the balconies and ;walkways over Gore 'Cree'k ,property behind Building C Ito ,facilitate elevator access to the new fourth floor tondorniniurns ,on top ofBuilding ~C. o Adjust existing ease~rne.nt ~to be consistent with the newpat'h alignment. Pleasecontact me with any questions or comments. Sincerely, 'Chip ~Me'Iick - :MELICK ASSOCIATES ~1lLL SEAS®115 C®IlTD®1VIIIVILTIVI ASS®CIA'I'I®IV 434 G®I2E CI~EEI~ DRIVE VAIIJ, C®I.,®RAD® 81657 (970) 476-222Il (970) 476-2684 FAQ Frederick Wyman II, President 93 Whippoorwill Road Armonk, NY 10504 Vail Town Council Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Town Council: March 29, 2004 (914)273-3145 (914) 273-5118 Fax crgfw@aol.com The All Seasons Condominium Association has been concerned for years with the traffic on Vail Valley Drive in the vicinity of the Golden Peak ski facility and ski school building (see attached letters). During peak times, primarily on Saturday and Sunday, the whole area is severely congested with traffic backed up as far as one can see. There are no traffic enforcement officers to direct traffic and frankly chaos reigns. Compounding this traffic morass is the valet parking with cars being shuttled back and forth. It is interesting to note that apparently Manor Vail seemingly runs daily transient parking which only adds to the congestion. . We respectfully request that you develop a plan to alleviate the excessive amount of traffic funneled into our neighborhood. When the Golden Peak structure was approved the neighborhood was told there would be no transient parking there. The reality is that the valet'parking results in the same thing, lots of cars driving to the mountain. This is not possible at either the Lion's Head or Vista Bahn portals to the mountain. Why here? A tangential but equally important concern is pedestrian safety while crossing Vail Valley Drive in the direction of the mountain. We specifically requested a pedestrian cross walk sign or area be created in the vicinity of Chalet Road and the Golden Peak structure for the past four or five years. The Town Council and the Planning Department have not seen fit to respond to our Association's request. We wonder what you are waiting for. Will it take the maiming or death of a child running the gauntlet of never ending speeding cars to spur you into action. Sincerely, FW:mI Vail\Town Council Vail Valley Dr. 32904 Frederick Wyman II President cc: Vail:Village Homeowners Assoc. (with enclosures) ALL SEASONS CONDOMINIZJM ASSOCIATION 434 GORE CREEK DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO 81657 (970) 476-2221 (970) 476-2684 FAX Frederick Wyman II, President 93 Whippoorwill Road Armonk, NY 10504 (914)273-3145 (914)273-5118 Fax crgfw@aol.com March 29, 2004 Vail Town Council Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Town Council: It has come to our attention that the Town of Vail intends to use Chalet Road as a storage area for materials and equipment for the Vail streets beautification project. While we applaud and support the streetscape project, our Association would prefer not being disturbed by having your construction materials stored next to our property and presumably preventing. passage along Chalet Road. We respectfully suggest that you consider other locations that may be convenient for this purpose such as the parking lot next to the playing fields and Vail Valley Drive. Sincerely, Frederick Wyman II President FW:mI Vail\Town Council Chalet Rd 32904 cc: Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowners Assoc., Via Fax: (970) 827-5856 & E-mail Lee Edwards, Texas Townhouse, Via E-mail A]LlL SEAS®I~1S C®I+1D®MIliTIiJM ASS®CIATI®IV 434 ~®12E CI2EEI~ DRIVE VAII., ~C®I.,®I~AD® 81657 (970) 476-2221 (970) 476-2684 >FAX Frederick Wyman II, President (914) 273-3145 93 Whippoorwill Road (914) 273-5118 Fax Armonk, IVY 10504 crgfw@aol.com Vail Town Council March 31, 2004 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Members of the Town Council, The All Seasons Condominium Association (ASC) has been notified that on Apri16, 2004 that the Town Council will be considering aspects of the Manor Vail Redevelopment plan. We wish to Town Council to know we are very concerned with the potential impact of this project on our neighborhood as well as the All Seasons complex. We are particularly concerned with what is being considered or proposed regarding the tennis courts. We have not seen a specific proposal to comment on and are addressing what we understand will be discussed. We are aware that the proposals and discussions at the moment are fluid and in the preliminary stages and we feel before things advance further you should be made aware of our issues. We understand that some have suggested that since tennis courts appear to be underutilized, which is not our understanding and may be due to the fact that they have not been properly maintained and are in a state of disrepair; that the Town of Vail and the Vail Recreation District would like to put this site to another use - possibly a park or a skate board facility. We are very concerned about either of these options and frankly are bewildered that your planning department would even remotely consider putting a skate board park in the middle of an established residential community. We are not much more enthusiastic about a park because we worry that ~it will attract incompatible activity or uses. For example as we understand it the covenants permit above ground recreational. structures to be built and we are not interested in having a Donavan Park type building constructed here. We think that the tennis courts should be refurbished and the area better landscaped. This is a known impact and the most desirable use of the site from the perspective of our Association. It needs to be recognized that the driving force behind what is being proposed is Manor Vail's need to find a suitable community benefit so they can get approval for their Special Development District and increase their allowable GFRA by over 20,000 square feet and exceed the height regulations. We do not want to compromise the integrity of our neighborhood so that Manor Vail can fund their remodeling project and while we do not wish to be obstructionists, however, we need time to understand what is being proposed and analyze the impacts. We respectfully ask the Vail Town Council to advise us specifically what is being proposed so that we can review and analyze the impacts of the proposals under consideration and appropriately respond. We would appreciate if it were technically possible to participate in the meeting via telephone as it is impossible for me to attend as I will not be in Vail: Sincerely, Frederick Wyman II President All Seasons Condominium Association cc: Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowners Association, Via Fax: (970) 827-5856 Robert McCleary, Manor Vail Resort, Via Fax: (970) 476-5683 Design Review Board, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657 Vail Planning Commission, 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657 Rams Horn, 416 Vail Valley Dr., Vail, CO 81657 Vail Trails East, 433 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, CO 81657 Texas Townhouses, 483 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, CO 81657 Vail/towncouncil manorvail MANOR VAIL GARDENS Conceptual Landscape Design Manor Vail Lodge Buildings D. E, & F Sheet L 1 03/20/04 Tall spruce and aspen massing Carefully manicured perennial beds, ornamental trees and shrubs along small pathway through garden. Two low (18") walls meander across garden to provide vertical relief for planting Proposed New Proposed Mill Ford Park Path Creek Bridge Alignment Tall spruce massing at entrance to - gardens to mark transition and serve as a gateway from the natural setting of Mil Creek into the more stylized, formal Manor Gardens i - ~~ I ~ ~ Lower fountain or `\ monument ringed with ~/ perennial and annual I Mill : New pool O O beds. Sod pathways and hot tubs surround beds and pat hs Creek _ _^~ to open up pathways and views of flower beds. • ` I . •. ~ ` n '~ ' . i Patio `~'/ . Accessible path ?i ~ ~: •~ i through garden > • ., ~ ~, ~ ~ . ~ ~ '~ • _ ~~ 1 _- _ . .. . ' ; ~ • Dwarf Alberta Spruce s ~ ~ ' ~ ' symmetrically placed among i _ _ _ -rte ~_ . ~_• manicured hedge-shrubs I '° ~ , ; : ~ u `'. ' '~ Fountain ringed by perennial r~; ' and annual color beds - __ _ t central focal point of gardens ;~ '~r• ~ ~~ ~ ~~ r~ D ZO ~. 1 * See Sheet L2 for Mill Creek/ Tennis Court concepts Gore Creek 1 Informal path of natural material leading through 1 existing trees to Gore Creek and seating area 1 1 Existing Ford 7 ~ yaicyc ® ®` ~~,_;;'~-~~ ~~,, ;_ - _ ,~ ~ Park sign ~~s^-~ . ~ ~~ / J , . `~ ~ 0 0 •,l - Bristlecone, Mugo Pine and evergreen plantings along Existing location of Ford Park Path - _path to provide winter interest Trees to be preserved and area of ~' Neils Lunceford Landscape Designl Build old path to be revegetated to match ~ 740 Biue River Parkway existing trees and shrubs Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 970.468.0340 Attachment: C MANOR VAIL LODGE Conceptual Landscape Design Tennis CourtArea Town of Vail Sheet L2 Scale 7" = 20' 03/20/04 s ~. ~• ~ i Existing Tennis Courts X to remain Native flowering shrubs along northern and western edges of courts -chokecherry, honeysuckle, thimbleberry and currant r ~ `~ t __ . '~- . . ~ s Mill Creek • ..-~.~ ~ ,i i ,J ,~ ` :~ 1. ~_ ~ (= ~ r Native wetland plantings-~ x along eastern edge of courts ,.-;`--~ • of willow, birch and r cottonwood ~~ ~„ ~ ~~ X • ~ -----~-- x x ------- k - X - x~--~-X • ~. . ~. Proposed New Ford Park Proposed Mill Path Alignment Creek Bridge . ~„ ~ ~ ~ ~~\ yr ~\ • • ~ ~ \\ . ~ • ~\ • ~_ ~- Neils Lunceford Landscape Design/ Build 740 Blue River Parkway Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 970.468.0340 I~ \\ ® ~ POOL r~ r PROPOSED GARDENS '~ti ~ F~, ~~ Landscape Legend Existing Evergreen Trees - to remain Existing Deciduous Trees - to remain ~ Proposed Colorado Spruce Picea pungens \ 8' to 22' in height Proposed Bristlecone Pines ~ ;\ Pinus aristata ~ \ 8' to 12' in height Proposed Deciduous Trees Populus tremuloides, Populus angustifolia \ 1.5" - 2" in dia. (10' to 15' tall) \ Proposed Trees -Varieties of maple, CSb alder, birch, crabapple, and chokecherry 1.5" - 2" in dia. (6' to 10' tall) ^r.- Proposed Shrub Masses - #5 Containers ~~ , _ _ _ Proposed Perennial/Annuals Proposed Turf Areas \ ,. Proposed Edging \\ Proposed Landscape Contours - - - - - - - FC.RD PARK P MANOR VAIL ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN s~MMER G' L~•~ SCALE: 1" _ $~'-~" WINTERz REVISED 2/7/04 (^ `, } ' .I ,4 \ (~ l II_~ i~ it ~ '~~~ I '~.~`. rte` V ~ ) EXISTIN / +~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i , WIMMING " ~ \ G OTAL - ~, ~ IILyI.. PARKING W! \ _ _ PgCES _~ - -~~ \~ .~ Fes( _ / ~ ~. '~ x c I,., ~ ~ r. ~ _ ~,`~, ~ o ~~ ~ ~~'ti ~r'*-~ _,' C 0 :. ~ .~ ~` ~~ ~~ '~j- _ .,a ~~ ~ ~~ ~ _, / !\ ~ _ ~y ~e 20'-0" SETS -~.~ VEILS ~U~CE~ORD ;.. ,;~ a'~;,. ~:~r~; SITFJLAND PUNNING LANDSCAPE DESIGNA3UILD 740 BLUE RIVER PARKWAY P.O. BOX 2130 31LVERTHORNE, CO 80498 PHONE: (970) 480-0340 FAX: (970)4884885 wvm.nelleluncehud.com ~'~ ;~~~, ~ IIV II ~ .l.r~ ~}~ ~ f ;~t~l MANOR VAIL BUILDINGS D, E & F ~ i v~' v i LANDSCAPE PLAN sUTAMER ~ a : - ~ ~~ ~ z L2.1 .SCALE: I" = 40'-0" w1NTER BA490r fifYAtpH-NH Z 4[RI ELEVAApH=BII]3l ' ,.:GA ~~~ Zn/O~ P... fLfYAMM~~.91A1.00 It VEILS LUNCEFORD ;~. '2~T~' SRELtND PIANNIND LANDSCAPE DESIGWBUILD 740 BLUE RIYER PARMNAY PA. BDX 1170 SBYFATHDPNE, CO BOS08 PNDNE: (070 48BIXK0 FAX ~BTO)4888805 rmwndle6~meNOd.mm ~ . ~' MANOR VAIL BUILDINGS A & B ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN S°"DER = L2.2 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" w~NTEk~ z rsEws~o 2/~/oa :,`~ _ , ~~ c ~ ~ + DOTAL PARKING SPACES ~_~~~~~ ~ ~ , ~ ",\ ~r ~; 4 '~ '~,r' ~ ~:~ ~~ \ ~ , '~ , ~ ^r - ~. . '` ~~ \ ~~ ~, r--1-------- _ ,1 - -~ 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ---}---~ 1 l 1 ~7asBieACf~ 1 I I ~ ,~~ ~_- -_~~~ 1- 11 ' I Nf PA710AAFA I 7a MGAESS FASEMENi BAG Si y~E - I 1 1 L-_ .IEI BUILDING IO AEAWN I I ~ 1~ U I 1 NEW ENiAY ~1 1 ® .IEI BUILDINGOVERSEiBACK VESiIBUtE I IEI PORIICNOF ~ ~-~ ~ 1 IN)WUIfNCiOSUPF ' I///-AUIUMNGAbhA BUILDINGA M BAG 5i0. - •• 1 .INI BUBOING OVBA SEiBACi( / SETBACK SB9 GSFJ - ~, v -~~I - -. -_. _.` .~ 1 I OF OVEA SE7BACK I n IF -_~ ~.,~ ceu ~.I NEW ENTRY ~ R .. . .,, ,. I - __.. __ 1 E RO ' ~ a~nrNr ~ ~ ~ INIS7uA I INOIVEAR~i>acRRo .~ ~ ~ ,~. _ ~ ~~ 1 ¢IsI,FO ' ~-, ~ ~ ~, ' I ,. .. .~ ... _ _.. _ ~ - ~ ~~\ 1 ROPERtt UNE ~_ .INI ROOF OVEA ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ /8'HEIGNi UMIIAPON ^. u r.' . ......__ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ ~ 1 I ~ I ( 1 ~ ~ ~ ROOT UNDER .. ~ ~} _ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ /B'HEIGMI UMTAIION 1 I rv ~ -'~ • ~ + ~ PIDGE 'iNI ROOF SPOBEIFlAiION JR'~d'IN7 I i. INDIGifS ELVABION r \~ fAOM IN7ERPOUAEO GRADEI C•. :' \, I t-;I . __ - ~ •_ -`-..._ .. '"r. / INI MklAGEAS UNIT .: n - _ _..- _r~ _ ~~•. _ -.-__-1 _.____._ ___.___._ _.___-._- ~ ~ IEI PORTION OF BUIt01NG I ~.Z~- _-~. _~J ..- __..-. ~_._ _ ,. ~~ ', •. ,.. ~' ,. ~,, BOYFA SETBACK 1571 GSFI / ~ III l ~ _ ~~ 1 .INI POR7101J OF MECHANICOL AOOM OVER SETBACK (756 GSFI BUILDING B ~ ,- ~ . '~~ ~ .; , i 1 ~ ~ ;, 1 1 ~~a ~;~ / ~; . ,. _ i 1 IEI POOL ~~ / x/ \\ 1 ` ~7a 5EBBACK U~,r. r / \ \ \ / \~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ ~~ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ \ /\ \ \ `\ \\ BUILDING C \\ \\ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ PROPERTYUN~~ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ ~\ \ \ \ \ ~ FA[E OF \ \ \ ~ BtDG ABOVE \ \ \ \ fACE OF ~~ \ \ \ \ DFCKABOVf \ \ \ \ `\\\\\~~ ~ \ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ ~ " /\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I NEW'1 ST FLOOR PL4N "~ ~: Bn~r-ra z MANOR VAIL LODGE STUDIO AND MANOR HOUSE ADDITION /RENOVATION MELICK ASSOCIATES INC. I ~ r--~-------------- I I 7 I M.I ICON ESTMR FROM EgBIING BUILDINGA I I I i -- -- 1:.4 Ili I ~ ~.~ . ~ ~~ __ _. ~. rr° ~ (I ~ ~ 1 ~_. ~ L I ,--~- . f .._ .. i I .. ... I .. . _l I t I I f' I II ~~l _ ~ ~I~ ~ I ~ ~~ __ ~'~ ~ I~ . ~,. ~ !„ _ _ ~ - f ~r , ~ L, I ,. ~' _ .,. - _ __ I _ I ~ ~, ~. I``r4-+--- - i _ ~i~< SEiAACK//O GSF; 317 I I I I I 1 1 PROPER77 t~JF ~I! 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 77 TOTAL \ \~ C PARKING ` SPACES ~ ~ ` 17 ~~ . v~\ B A<.1 1:14 __". ,_ „_ ~ .. _ J ~~ J l~ ur~il I ~ i ~ i Ir I r --;~- °r~ ~, I ,.. _, . _ ~ .. ~ ~ y~ ~ y _ ~~1 ~~'ti`~s r~` I 4 ~ ~I tel. ~` -~ '- r . ~- .~~~: ~y~- .~ 1 ~ :I f Iv. I ~. ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ n.R ~ I ~ l I- ~ ,. ..~ - -, ~ ._ ,, r ~ \ ~, G. ~ . I~~ ~ ~ ~ ~_.., v /. I ~U~ ~~. ,: ' , ~~ ~~~, ' ~. / ~ / ~ ~~J, ~ ~ ~ ,1,! _ ' ~y ~ .~A' B ~ `. ~~~ ~i , \ / l (NI POAnoN OF BULDINGC \ S tE ~, ~/ CANTILEVERED OECYS pVfA ® PROPERTY UNF {7E4 GSFl F ~ ~ ;J 7 J. ./ ~~l' / ' r ` 0~ ;~. ~ \(~~ ~ ~ ____ ~ rT~ ~.,. '~ ~_ ~ _ c,,. I NE OR PLAN ~;~; '~3~, ~ ~ ,a R90 / ~ ~,- i ., ,--,, ,~ ~~ / PARKING LOi 1 I 7GRN AROUND I ~ ~ I 1 ~~\ ~ I \~ L ~\ ~ ~ / ~~~/// / ~ I/ i ,E P \~ /I °O. 'o, ~~ RI l// l1 /Al/' Q %~ ~ '~~i b ~ /~ viii ~~i, d 1 ~~li \~~///~ 2 ~/ A<.4 1 1 ~ '~~1 ~ 1 1 PREA FOA PORN~IAt DECK E%PANSION 1 ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~, ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~~ ~ \~ 11 J / N `` 1 .e.`i 't ~ 0 w ~.,p ~ (~''S~ ~REOUAED FIAf C DEPARTMENT O/ srAGINGAREA 4 C \~~ A ~1 i 1 1 1 1 1 E POATION OF BUILDING 8 \ DECKS OVER SET&1CK(dBGSF (E PORTION Of BUILDNG B OVER SETBACK (171 GSF; BSGRFN ~(N~ POR7ION OF BUILOINGC OSEA BE7BACK (790 GSFI i 1 (E) PORTION OF Bl-U71NGC DECQ OVER SETBACK 11175 GSq E( PORTION Of BUIUNNG C OVER `SETBACK 13497 GSF; 48BI GRFN `', . .A `~~ N~PORiION OF BUIU)INGCDECI6 /`, OVER SE7BACK (I 150 GSfJ n, , {,/ -'~~~' 1i ~;~~ ~ ` BUILDING C ~~~, ~~ L ~ X" us ~, t :: ~ ., ~ ,, .> ~~ . ~.~.~ ~/ 1 j ~ ~ f. v ,7 J~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~i ~ -;/4~~ /~ i ~ ~ ,M ~r.~ ~ ~j r. /~- ~ / , / ~ . ~~~~ v / ~ ` ~ L 0 ~ ~~ C ~ C-f~ ~ Ards ._ ~ fl .iI ~,F \ O ~ ~ ~) Y MINIMUM FIPf TRUCK \ C E r / ® \~ NRNING RADIUSES C C ,V '~ ' C C ~ ~`~ ~ ~ 0 ~i MANOR VAIL LODGE \ \ ~ , `~ \ STUDIO AND MANOR HOUSE ADDITION I RENOVATION ` ~ `~ ~ M ELICK ASSOCIATES INC. ~ ___ \ ~ _ \ \ ~ ~ \_\ \\ ~_ " BUILDING D 11 1 1 1 - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I 1 1 I 1 - ~I - -- /'-2a f1'W.INGAESS FASDIfNi 11 __ _// I II - - - - - - ~_ I ~ - - - _-=~ -~1 I ~.I AA.z 1 sao•sEiaA~K I I B 1~ 1 A~.I 1 I ~ ~ I NEW E%175RNA FAOM EYJSnNG _ ... _ 1 1 , I /I i 1 1 ~-t-~"°""B BUILDINGA ~'' 1 ;_ ------_--_-I _ ___®~ ~ 1 I II _ _ - - - 1 1 1 I I A:IP ~ /:I2 1 - - .. I .~-z _ - ~ ~,~_ i 1 ~_ I ~I_ II_ ,..,. I ~.... ~~ ~ .... ~j ~ ... „_. ~.. ~ ~ ` 1 I~PROPfRIY DNE ~> . ~- ~~ ._ - _~ ~~~ - . __.. ~ ~._..~ __ ~ ~~. _ ~._._ ~ ... . _ .__ ~~~ ~~ ... ~ - 0 T - -- ~ '~ I ~~ ~~~ - I J .: ~ , 1 ~ LL ~ ~... ~_ ~ ~~, ~ - ~ ~ ;1 L._~:I I II ..~ _ ~ ` ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ LO ~ A' ~ . ~I- ~ e O h, f ~ ~u.e--" y~ I .I _.. ~ -- r I -, r ~,_ ~ _ - i. ' ~" ~ i I ~ . ~~ ~ _. ~I 1 J - E POARION GF Al-LDINGAOVER \ ~_--_ ~ i I SETBACK 11dD G8F; 342 GRFN I I I I I I M.I ~ BUILDING B 1 ~-PROPEAttI~JIF / / I ~ ~` ~ < ~ i ~. ~y/ L~//,~ ~ \ ~ ~~~ `~', U+I PORTION OF BUIUMNGC ~ ~~' ~ CANnIEVfREO DECKS OVER '\ `,~ /~~ PAOPERtt UNE 1114 G7F7 ~ , ` \ M.I 1AT ~ ` ~~ ~ LINE \ ~ \ ~. '~y ~~ ~r.~ ~-A V~ ~ , u" M " ~ ,~ \~~~ \ ~ ~r ~~ ~~~ ~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,. POARION Of BUItaING B ~\ CKS OVE0. SETBACK IB75Fl ~ POAIION OF AllMINGB OVER EreACxpn csF; es cnFq Q POAnON OF BUIIDWG COh0. \ :TRACK 190GSF \ I) PORRION Oi BUILDING CDECKS iVERSEI&1CK 1171 GSF) I PORTION OF BUIUNNG C DECKS VER SEIBAIX II/35GSF) I PORTION OF &JRDING C OVER ~iBACK (3797 GSF; 7881 GPfN C \ , rtq> ~ All \`\'' / ~ ~~`"~' '~~~. ,, ~ BUILDING C 4~ <~ ~- ~ ~ q l.i. \ ., ~~ r ~~1 \~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ \ ~ \. /~, ~~ ~ ~ _, "~ ~ ^ __ ~ ~ -__ _ ~, _ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ MATC ~" _ ~ LINE '~ _ _ MANOR VAIL LODGE ~ STUDIO AND MANOR HOUSE ADDITION/RENOVATION ~ `~ ~ ~~.~~~ 1 NEW 3RD FLOOR PLAN MEIICK A$$OCIATES INC \~ \`v Ala ~cAIE:A~nr. r.o- ~ Z ~,~ \ ~ ~ • BUILDING D ~~ I 1 I ~ I ~ I ~ 7V A' w. INGAf56 FASFMFM 1 I 1 _ _ _. ~ 11 A/.I 1 M.2 I B ~'~~ ~ ,1 7D SEifi•CK LLLLJJJJ ~ M.I ~-P0.OPER7Y UNE BUILDINGA ~~ - ~~ / _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1_17 117 I . - - •- ~~~ I ~I --- ~ ~ ~~~~ - . - -- - ---- ~ - - ~ _ _ _ - ' i J _ it = ~ •'I - _ _ ~ ~ '°> -r - - - II , I -- ~ -- ~ -- -- 1 ROOF DECK UNIT 4A 1 I 3797 NSA UNIT 4A 1 I I I 7675 GRFA 7668 NSA 36a GAFA 1 I __ 1 .~ 4 1 LEI PORTION OF Bu1lIRNGA 1 ROOF OYEA SEIB1CK937 GSq ` 1N1 PORTION OF BUILDING B DECKS O/E R SETBAO(11 B7 GSF) II ~ BUILDING B 753 NS1 Ni PORTON OE BL-IdNGB /--7P SEifl1C1( ~ 3140 GAFA OVER SEI64CK 190 GSf; 60 G16q~ '1~/ 1 A/,7 1 1 /l h ~ / '' ' ~ ~ BUILDING C ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ PoanoNOrBURDNGc ~ \~ ~' hj DE OVER SETBACK I637G6Ff E1 RiN)N OF BIAIDINGC OVE BACK 13796 GSF; 7881 GAFy y ' ,Q~ ~ POA71ON OF BUILDING C ~ ~ ~ ~ A47 (. ~ IEYEAED DECKS OYEA ~' L~~ PROP UNE1171 GSFI M.I - ~.~. O ~ ~ '~r>~/" ~! oRnonoreulLDINGc NE ~ ~ /~ , ~ ,~ ~ ~ of GvER6ETBAGKpe6GSFl r~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~' 1 ~ ' ~~ IN ~ noNOreunumGC ~ ~ ~ ", ~~ ,~ - '/ OVER BACK 196O3F1 ~ f / 1 2. ~~ ~ v ~ ,~~ , ~1 ~ ~~, ~A~ ~f 'r~ "r ~ ~ ... ~..: ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~1: r 1 \ ~ ~~ A $E .~ 4 ~ ~ -~~_ .. ~ ~ ~~ ~ i f- ! ~ O v ' ~ ~ T~ ~ NE V '°4 ~'• A MANOR VAIL LODGE ~ \ ~ ~ STUDIO AND MANOR HOUSE ADDITION) RENOVATION ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ ;~ 1 NEWAFOURTH FLOOR PIAN M E L I C K ASSOCIATES INC. • ~ ~ ~ idl~ q.A w~xm tmil34 . Lp Z ~ ~ • i I I 1 __ __.. I I 'r _ _ ~I .I + I I IIE/'mI~\II I I __ O I I I~1p 5Ei6+CK 1 1 uND4E 3057 NSA 1951 GRFA B Q~ ~® .~® . uNp /f 2357 N5/ 2223 GRfA \ V ~\ ~\ °a NEW FIFTH fL00R PWJ '''jjj``` I OVER BUILDING'O A],5 SSE: 1/~3T•I•p 2 BUILDING D 2p ~p W. INGRESS EASENENi M.I A n...... .... A/.I RIDGE L _ i i i i __~ )f OUIIDMG C DECKS OVER (122 G5F1' -- ~ 4:12 4:11 - r 1:11 I:p PIDGf L ~ o 112 , 111 a I _ - a A/.l UNli 1G \ 2353 NSA 1210 G0.FA ~ A \~) \ O M"' ROOF DECK ~ 4P ~~ / \ __ PtGE I - I ~ _. ~I BUILDING B P~f 1 1 1 2tl SEi6KK 1 1~ M.1 1 1 ~PROPERtt UNE 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\~ 1 1 1 1 1 N \ 1 \ 11 // ~ /~ / ) M1 \7 j 1 \ N1 PORRpN OF AUIIDING B \ , ROOf OVEA SEiflACK 140 G7F 1 ~~ 2 \ ~ 4 ~ 1~ /7 h i/Y \ ,/ I' 11 n UNIT ID 1 1177 NS1 A1.I 4200 GRFA 4 \ \ ~ ~ G ~~ ,l \`~~ \\ j ~`\ ~ ~ OR VAIL LODGE \ ~ ~ STUDIO AND MANOR , OUSE ADDITION! RENOVATION ~ ~ MEEICK q SSOCIATE$ 1NC. ~~ \ \ \\ 'LDING C P00.RION OF BUIIfRNG C OVE0.5E704CKII700 GSF1 ~1 P00.ilON OFOIIIU]MGC 0 SEiflACI((3131 GSF; 21d/GPFN / A4.2 UNIidE 7051 NSA 2951 GSA ~O ®® o° 0 o® ATCN LE IViEIVIORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 6, 2004 SUBJECT: Appeal of the March 8, 2004, Planning and Environmental Commission approval of a request for a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels (a more complete metes and bounds description is available at the Community Development Department) and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts Development, represented by Braun Associates Appellant: Vail Town Council Planner: Bill Gibson I. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject site, Track K, Glen Lyon Subdivision, is a Town of Vail owned property zoned Special Development District No. 21, Glen Lyon. The applicant is proposing to construct a new snowcat access road between the Vail Resorts maintenance facility and Vail Mountain, generally located south of the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD) and Vail Amoco sites (846 West Forest Road and 934 South Frontage Road) to the Westin-Ho trail/catwalk. II. STANDING OF APPELLANT The appellant, Vail Town Council, has standing to "call-up"any decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission. III. REQUIRED ACTION The Town Council shall uphold, modify, or overturn the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a request for a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels. Pursuant to Sub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make findirgs of fact in accordance with the following: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (Zoning Regulations, Title 72) have or have not been met. is IV. BACKGROUND On March 8, 2004, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (by a vote of 6-0) approved, with conditions, the request for a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for "Century Wall" Keystone retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height in association with Vail Resorts Development's snowcat access proposal (Attachment B). Staffs March 8, 2004., memorandum to the PEC has been attached for reference (Attachment A). On March 16, 2004, the Vail Town Council "called-up" the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of the variance request. On March 17, 2004, the Town of Vail Design Review Board (by a vote of 4-0) directed Staff to approve the design review application for Vail Resorts Development's snowcat access proposal should the retaining wall variance approval be upheld by the Town Council; however, should the variance approval not be upheld the Vail Resorts Development's design review application is tabled to the Design Review Board's April 7, 2004, meeting. V. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN CODE The applicable Town Code regulations, planning documents, and review criteria are noted in the attached March 8, 2004, Staff memorandum to the PEC (Attachment A). VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council upholds the Panning and Environmental Commission's approval of a request for a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels, subject to the following finding: The standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards, have been met with the applicant's proposal. VII. .ATTACHMENTS A. Staff's March 8, 2004, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission B. March 8, 2004 Planning and Environmental Commission meeting results (excerpt) C. Revised Landscape Plans D. Photo Simulations E. Public Notice 2 NiEMORANDUiVi TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 8, 2004 SUBJECT: A request for final review of a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels, a more complete metes and bounds description is available at the Community Development Department and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts Development, represented by Braun Associates Planner: Bill Gibson I. SUfVifVIARY The applicant, Vail Resort Development, is requesting a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels to facilitate the construction of a new snowcat access road generally located south of the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD) and Vail Amoco sites (846 West Forest Road and 934 South Frontage Road) to the Westin-Ho trail/catwalk. Based upon Staffs review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of a variance to allow the construction of retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height subject to the findings and conditions noted in Section IX of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant is proposing to construct a new snowcat access road generally located south of the ERWSD and Vail Amoco sites (846 West Forest Road and 934 South Frontage Road). This proposal will facilitate the re-routing of Vail Resorts' winter mountain maintenance traffic from West Forest Road to this new access road. This new access route will start from the western driveway of the Vail Resorts maintenance facility, cross South Frontage Road and continue south along the western ERWSD property line, bridge across Gore Creek, continue southwest across Town of Vail owned Tract K, and connect to the Westin-Ho trail/catwalk. The proposed access road will be a 25-foot wide gravel road surface. Due to the steepness of slopes on Tract K, the proposed access road will have finished grades as steep as 16% and will require the construction of both cut and fill retaining walls. At their tallest. points, the cut walls will be approximately 14 feet = Attachment: A in height and the fill walls will approximately 12 feet in height. These proposed retaining wall heights exceed the 6-foot height maximum allowed by Chapter 14- 6, Vail Town Code. The applicant is proposing to construct both the cut and fill retaining walls with a Keystone Retaining Wall System. Architectural plans and material descriptions have been attached for reference (Attachment C). Additionally, a Geotechnical Report for the proposal has also been attached for reference (Attachment D). III. BACKGROUND On July 15, 2003, the Vail Town Council granted Vail Resorts permission to proceed through the Town's development review process for the proposed snowcat access road which crosses Town of Vail property. On December 8, 2003, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a Vail Resorts' application for Forest Place Subdivision located at 615 West Forest Road. One of the Planning and Environmental Commission conditions of approval was that Vail Resorts discontinue the use of West Forest Road as snowcat access between its maintenance facilities on South Frontage Road and the ski mountain. The applicants' proposal was conceptually reviewed by the Design Review Board at its November 3, 2003, February 4 and March 3, 2004 public hearings. The snowcat access proposal was previously reviewed in association with a proposed addition to the ERWSD facilities. The proposed construction of the ERWSD addition has since been put on hold and the design review application withdrawn by ERWSD. At its March 3, 2004, hearing the Design Review Board focused solely on the snowcat access proposal. The Design Review Board discussed the proposed access road design, retaining wall designs, bridge design, and landscaping plan design; and at the conclusion of these discussions, the Design Review Board was supportive of the applicant's proposal. 'IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then by the Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval/denial/approval with conditions of a variance. The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for evaluating a proposal for: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 2 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. . 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. Conformance with development standards of zone district Lot area Setbacks Building Height Density G RFA Site coverage Landscape area Parking and loading Mitigation of development impacts, Design Review Board: Action: The Design Review Board has NO review authority on a variance, but must review any accompanying Design Review Board application. Town Council: Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memorandum containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that the following provisions of the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: 3 TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIONS Chapter 12-17: Variances 12-17-1: Purpose: A. Reasons For Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives 'of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. TITLE 14: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS HANDBOOK Chapter 14-6: Grading Location or Type Maximum Height Additional Review or Approval P.E. Stamp Required Regular Walls 0-4' Staff Review or DRB No (Detail 10) 4'-6' Staff Review or DRB Yes Bench of combination walls (Detail 10) 4' or % the difference of exposed height Staff Review or DRB Yes Right-of-Way 0-3' Staff Review or DRB No 3'-6' Staff Review or DRB Yes 6' + Staff Review or DRB PEC Yes Setback (10' from paved surface and 2' from adjacent property lines) NA Staff Review or DRB PEC Yes In Front Setback 0-3' _ Staff Review or DRB No On slopes greater than 30% and related to access 3'-6' Staff Review or DRB Yes VI. SITE ANALYSIS Legal Description: Lot K, Glen Lyon Subdivision Zoning: Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (P/S) Land Use Plan Designation: Open Space Current Land Use: Undeveloped VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zonin North: Gore Creek Natural Area Preservation South: US Forest Service Eagle County East: Undeveloped Natural Area Preservation & Outdoor Recreation West: Residential Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential 4 - - VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 1'2-16, Vail Town Code. A. Consideration of Factors Regarding the Setback Variances: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff does not believe the granting of this variance will have significant negative impacts to existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Similar retaining walls have previously been constructed in association with other access projects such as the nearby pedestrian and skier bridges. Due to the steepness of this site, the proposed additional retaining wall height associated with this snowcat access road design will reduce the amount of site disturbance to the hillside when compared to designs using tiered walls in strict compliance with the wall height requirements. Furthermore, the ERWSD has granted formal easements for permanent access across its property between Vail Resort's maintenance facilities and the proposed snowcat access road. Additionally, Tract K is identified as "TOV Owned Lands/Open Space Use" by the Town of Vail Comprehensive Open Lands Plan and no future development of the site is anticipated. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. Staff believes this proposed variance request involves "exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone" as this proposal is associated with the construction of an access road to the ski mountain and not the construction of a residential or commercial development project. Pursuant to Chapter 14-6, Vail Town Code, the proposed retaining walls may not exceed six feet (6') in height unless the proposed walls are located within a street right-of-way. Within a street right- of-way, retaining wall heights may exceed six feet (6') in height without a variance. Examples of retaining walls greater than six feet (6') in height can be found throughout the Town of Vail's right- of-ways. The proposed snowcat access road will be located on Town of Vail owned property; however, it will not be located within a designated street right-of-way, and will therefore require a retaining wall height variance. 5 The applicant has explored design alternatives with retaining walls not exceeding six feet (6') in height. The applicant has demonstrated that due to the steepness of Tract K, in some locations along the snowcat access road a series of tiered six foot walls may be feasible; however, the use of a series of walls creates significantly more disturbance to the existing hillside than single cut and fill wall. The applicant has also demonstrated that in some locations along the snowcat access road, six foot tiered retaining walls may require terracing the entire hillside to "catch grade." Therefore, Staff believes the proposed additional retaining wall height associated with this snowcat access road design will reduce the amount of necessary site disturbance when compared to designs using tiered walls in strict compliance with the wall height requirements. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff believes the proposed retaining wall height variance will not have a significant negative impact on the light and air, distribution of population, public facilities and utilities. Staff believes that the proposed re-routing of Vail Resorts' snowcat access will have a positive affect on transportation, traffic facilities, and public safety; since Vail Resort's maintenance vehicle traffic will be no longer occur on a public street (i.e. West Forest Road) through a residential neighborhood. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. At its March 3, 2004, hearing .the Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the snowcat access proposal. The Design Review Board discussed the proposed access road design, retaining wall designs, bridge design, and landscaping plan design; and at the conclusion of these discussions, the Design Review Board was supportive of the applicant's proposal. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 6 _ a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. IX. STAFF RECOIVifVIENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyori Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, subject to the following findings: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 4. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the following conditions: 1. This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail design review approval of the associated design review application. 7 2. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall enter into a lease or license agreement with the Town of Vail for the use of Town property. 3. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the covenants of Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction staging plan for review and approval by the Town of Vail. 5. Prior to the issuance of a, grading permit, the applicant shall survey and then install all limits of disturbance. fencing and all erosion control methods for review and approval by the Town of Vail. 6. The applicant shall properly maintain the limits of disturbance fencing and erosion control methods throughout the construction of this proposal. Any modification to the location or configuration of the limits of disturbance area shall require review and approval by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's Statement C. Architectural Plans D. Geotechnical Report E. Public Correspondence F. Public Hearing Notice 8 - - t~' E~ ~~ `.~ k~~a r rQ~i .at ~ - ~ ; {' i ~ ~' } ('•~~: ~ ~ ,~:. U ~ r~ , , ~, ~ ~ i _ {~~ et a y ~ d'~~1~ ~~ ~ ~ ,`r i ~f' ' 7 ~ k `' ~~ ~ , ~ ` e ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 t ~,' ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ ~~~ - _ ~-= ~~r ~_; ~: x ' '~ ~ ~ t .+ e K F k-- f0~'F~e~t:~T , ~u ,~ E. - rj `~ L ~ 7 Lt'. ~.. _~~ ~~, r .. ~'.: ~, ~;; a ?~ } .w.i. ''' - ;1 D n S ~D r' D Attachment: B I~AII/I~If~l~l1~1 ~~~~~IA~I~IE~, 111~~. PLANNING and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Febniary 24, 2004 Bill Gibson Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: Response to 2/17 Letter, re: snowcat access retaining wall height variance Dear Bill, Thank you for your letter of February 17`'' regarding the staff s review of the retaining wall variance request. Enclosed you will find a revised set of plans. So you have a clear idea of our response to your questions, below I have copied your letter verbatim and provided a response to each issue you have raised. Written Statements • A "written description of the nature of the variance requested card t1~.e specific regulation(s) involved, including an explanation of wl~y the variance is required and why the strict or literal interpretation of the specific regulation(s) would result in a physical 1lardship or practical difficulty. " Response The specific regulation involved is found on page 19 of the Development Standards Handbook which limits the height of retaining walls to 6'. The retaining wall is needed in order to construct a new snowcat access road to Vail Mountain. Proposed wall heights vary along the length of the cut and fill walls and are depicted on the wall elevations plans that have been provided under separate cover.. Given the existing grades of the hillside surrounding the access road, if maximum 6' high walls were used it would require three terraced walls on the cut side (upper) of the accessway and two terraced walls on the fill side (lower) of the accessway. This design would be much more impactive, both physically and visually on the hillside and present a practical difficulty. A written statement addressing: "cl. How the request complies with adopted Town of Vail planning policies and development objectives. " Edwards Village Center, Suite C-209 Ph. - 970.926.7575 0105 Edwards Village Boulevard ~ Fax - 970.926.7576 Post Office Box 2658 vrww.braunassociates.com Edwards, Colorado 81632 _ Response The T own h as i dentified a g oal o f r emoving s nowcat a ccess from W est F orest Road (i.e. Lionshead Master Plan). This new access road will result in the removal of snowcats from West Forest Road. 2. Topographic Survey Response A topographic survey has been provided in the plan set. 3. All plans must also be submitted in 8.5" x 11" reduced format Response Reduced plans will be provided prior to distribution of the PEC packet. 4. Landscape Plan Response A landscape plan is included in the plan set. 5. Site Plan Show percent slope of the road and spot elevations as necessary along the centerline of the road to accurately reflect grade. Show proposed surface drainage on and off-site. Show location of limits of disturbance fencing. Response Limits of disturbance is depicted on the site plan. Drainage improvements are depicted on the site plan. Arrows have been added indicating where water is being directed. The site plan depicts 2' contours the entire length of the access way, we assume that this should satisfy your request for spot elevations. Road grades are depicted on the profile of the access way (see sheet 4) 6. Architectural Elevations All elevations of the proposed development drawn to scale and fully dimensioned. The elevation drawings must show both existing and finished grades. Path profiles must be drawn at the same vertical and horizontal scale. All exterior materials and colors shall be specified on the elevations. Response Wall elevations are drawn to scale and with the same vertical and horizontal scale. Profile information is provided on the elevations in order to provide dimension infornation. The material proposed is Keystone Block. Color of the block.will be provided via material sample at the PEC meeting. It should be noted that we are current evaluating an alternative wall material and should have a decision on this material in the next few days. As you know, we are in the process of putting together a DRB application for this project. If a change to wall material is made, it will be defined in our DRB application. Thanks Bill, I hope this takes care of the questions regarding this application. . Sincerely, Thomas A. Braun, AICP Cc: Bill Kennedy Gary Brooks Review Criteria-Variance to 6' Retaining Wall Height Before acting on a variance application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: a. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and stnuctures in the vicinity. Applicant's Anal~is: The proposed variance to wall height will provide a more sensitive design solution for the site and in doing so provide an improved relationship to surrounding uses and structures. Given the existing grades of the hillside surrounding the access road, if maximum 6' high walls were used it would require three terraced walls on the cut side (upper) of the accessway and two terraced walls on the fill side (lower) of the accessway. This design would be much more impactive, both physically and visually on the hillside. b. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. Applicant's Anal: The existing grade of the hillside and the width of the proposed snowcat access road are the two factors most directly influencing the height of the proposed retaining walls. The width of.the road has been minimized to the extent feasible.while still allowing for adequate drainage and safe passage. The design of the walls has been done in order to balance the degree of cut and fill slopes. c. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Applicant's Analysis: The proposed variance will have little, if any, affect on any of the above criteria. The wall variance will, however, allow for a land use (the new snowcat access) that will improve public safety by removing snowcat traffic from West Forest Road. U f.Y c a~ U (C a -1 FOREST RO,a,~ SN©WCAT BYPASS RI=TAINING WALL HEIGHT VARIANCIr TO~/1/N OF VAIL, COLORAC~O FEBRUARY 20014 N0. Ok1E REN90N$ bY" Di 'S ~ V/JPUfCC PCIw T . MCY - ~ - ~ C - .- ;; , - - ~ - 4 .1 - - ~ - -. - SHEET INDEX a ~ UTILITY CQNTACT.S ~ ,1 ~ 1 , ~ )~ CONSULTANT CONTACTS Wai• k Sv:r SJ+ lC J v Pew Vulr k swla) U k 1 ~ A ,Y+a H+~•• / (q)m ~ )qed P•OfYCJ.T TnJ. h FT-i a i nn L C " ~ " - - ~ W. E tYk .. T ~ , - . C 4 Nw MI soruiq Ip~ D ¢ (Ow ) ~ P 51W> . ~~. 8 0 (d Gcav E 9Y ) /'JV1f vreom (P)0) 9) 5f i5 ~ w4f I4 E rt _ =B GI ( I:i.YC ) (7mj 4 J ~05 . ' ,T~ ~. (D+v)f),/ S S b~~vr•(P)-). •6~-6tlnQ k26 Jl C (~ / ~ B (->P+ ~ -.H SET: ~' P ~ j ~ G (a,D)~ lu ? ~ crf aJl 1'i; ) coJ .- - i ~ ~: C & ... ~: U. uH lJ ]7 259-5) ( ~C~N (c i )'. ~. f A .(9 ) 9 9 23• ~,. '' ;~-- --tea - ;:, 111'?~~~? a., . _:.~.~= W . = '--_ -:%'r ~ ~i ~i~r i ~~ ._ ~r i!ii sir ~,w--_-~__ _ UILI .. ~ '~~: ~- _- .:!. ~i it Gr r~~ ~~ j~l~i i/ r~~_ 'i ~^i~ ~~ - Q.4%O O ri - -~ 4/ / /~ r . , p ~_~_ _~~i'~" r rii~///`iii ~~~~ ~ _~r'~ m~iOQ~ .a .. ~ ~ __r2-_~ r,~ -: Y...--~~~1~ _~ -'-__--= ~~ ,S~iii~i% ~:'~ riri ~ ~OC9.(U~"N~rIL:; iii. ----~'.~/ -/, r.%-_-'~r__r r~_.__'' iri/~ /__ f ~z':44U -i ~~ r ~fl"'F i`ir%.-~'~ \ \~` .~ jr~iii/// _=-_~ irl~= =~ - _ I Oi~O lily r i ~. _- , ` ` \ `- _ ////i~i/.~j~~--- =-G~r~,a~~ _ I .. ~ .VIZ O .. ~r c i --' - ti ~- ~ i%i./l/^..`i ~i ~_ _ ^ ~ ~ 'yam ~~ 4 ~ r r ri i - ~- /ii !iii, 1 ~.w~. - r~ r - r rir~ _ ~ I ~ UNPLATTED- _ - -s: >~ir~~iii- TOWN OF VAIL 4' .. ~ .. ~~ iii ~rijii%_ _-_ ~-"-' _- - ~ ~-_/r~~r Sri _ -^ ~ i/rim ii %~ _~ =-~ _ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~_ .~- ` ~ ~ ~ 1 'y .. } ~ ~ %i iy.-fill ~ ~ ~ i _-- = ~ ~ ~ ~ =i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Y ~~i i~~r rr~~ ~i iii i _ a~z~ _ /// ~ rr~~ -- - ~i.~ -r /,mar ~~ l ,_ _ _-/ GLEN LYON ll DIVISION. ~ __~?-7 . r ~ l ,,r / i i .,,,,- /i. ~- „ ~ ALL. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORIAA710N ~ .. .. I - ~~ ?~ ~ /. J ~-1-~' ~'T-/ f- r--,~ y,- .~:~f.r ~ _:'. ` r'`~-`- r' ~ r~~-~'~ ~ - . - - - - -'Sl1PPUED ~BY- PF VE LAND-GONSULT,lN3S= = = - = J ' „II /' ;^y i :~ {rr a:.. ,'. ' _ r/ r~a~i, // -+ _ SCALE.• 1 ~ =''3p' ~' ~ ` ,,,.. ~, . .~ _ /i ;: f`.`~ r PRELIMINARY', • r' t ~ ' IJOT~.FOR'~CONSTRUC SHEET ..} ~~ ;~; r TION `1 _ °r~ - ; ~ _ ,.. a. t ... :~ - ~= ti. = ' ~. i a NOT A PANT [Y . TWS SUBUliTn1 %'' ~_ ~~; ~pw ~ r~ _~~" ' .\ _ ' 1?;T -s'o=-=-- -- w'LL ] -~ J,~ , ~... ~ ~'~^F Sri ~. /,/i .x - - . _- (n Z _~i~ t . /~ .. . l/// - / i ~ / -/`,C ~i/ S-......iylr~, // /i ~ - Q Q O~. ' ~ _ ~. / / t`n~ fir i ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ _/ ~ _` m ~ ~ ~ J . ~ .~ ~ _.. v / / _ /'/' Aor ~ ~~ Y f _/ - j -~ ~ -cllN'LYfiN Yy'QBgIP~I l@L G ~ „ i ~~ '' UI J Q'= t"' ' / i ~ -''-~~~ " -!-'ss' Fr,--rte' ~.~:-t~~~r-~ ~ - ~:~-_.~ir9 ~ t:~ ytlI ~ ~ Q li'~m U /Yri / ~ ~ ~~ ~. / / jig/~' 2"~.e-/~f s ~,~o~ ~ -~ '..~ -~~ iJ' C~ ®,~1 ~{~ ~ ~ :li O .. ///ri/ ~ ~ T` , \~ _ _ //."ice- ~~ `' '~ -._ _ ~ ~~'~i' ~~_~ ~ _- i _ U] O - i .,b \ ~ ~//.'/j7~ ,Fi .%~' ~' ~ f- - ~ - ~ / i ~ - t SCALE.' 1. .,30. W Q I-: OW ~ ~ __ .= iii/i> /~ /i~3 ~r ice' -- ~ _~±' it'"'~ "_= ~ ~ ,,,,, -' i ..c iLO. wamr . N..s ~_ . ~ ~ . i~~f i~c/f 'k ~'.l . ~ .~ , c+~ ~ w~aassa wxaw.cc..,a ~ ' s^+/ ."'. ~ ~ ,~/ w / / . ~ - ~ pr....a as F' ~ i /y y/.~~j~~`/~ ^'~ ~'C3~l f' -r ~~r~~ fwrr t~~,,;, ar,n,., .,Dlf. '' ~ ~ % (~ ~^!'f ~ ~~~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1. 1W5 ,~ PEPRCSErvtS lrrE r:avCB D,luu USED B ~u ' - i / / ! ~.. ~!/ . . ~ _ iii - _ ~ ~ ~ASSDaArz`s raR~TnE uor.sr,i.o-REDE.nowENt ;N /~ "" - _ ~i~ ~ ~ -i 'T ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~'i~.u PflLrais o ERE D+uo an . rrEU'Tpnocrt.6rrK ~ . i / / / // ~ ~ ~/ / '~ '~ " u PRO:t0E0 fiY PE L D Cy 'LLT,NiS. Kluu fAWtN °~f~' /' / ~ •/ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ PRDirLE5~12ED 10 6L PPCPMEO PR 6R ID wtiL Cd:S IRUC~rCVL ~~~ ~J ~ •r,.. y.~ ,~~ A.~ ~~ ' ~.•/ / j --.~C.Lp~ ~ v ~ 'iw,L wNL NGCN V,Rr uv TD. ./- G:E fODI. I I\ l -tR I - I f A ~I'. ~F ~ /:/ / ~ ~ r. PEKGE 1E rLL W Mi [D ,NC M[ CfirS RL DN I 1_-- r _f ^-~'f i_ ~' '.t ~ /~ ~ .ca.w, a n1R ~RE s 2..r rp+ T -.,.luE' 1 Pw 1 :: ~.,,,-- T-i r•• -" ~.•~p / / // ~/f i '~'`'..~ _F ~' ~ - /i/ i~% :! ~ ..z ~~ s. E srLi rE.re P M TO CM ff CEVENI'Of EONS ac;: 11 ~ •~~~ -, j~- 7 ~-~ f-~' / ~ /-.t-,~ 7 _ ,.~ /r.f Y'~ ~- .r ~' i~r.Cx _ _ _ -- _ _ - _ _ - ._ _ •_ _ - nE dncs. ,' ` .. _ ] flE ER O TrE fEDtEtlv CAL ST D NEPARED D GO.IY ~+ ~. 9 / L ' ~ . TES EO 1/ 5/ C ~ ~ ..~: ~/ i'7! / .. ~/ ~ i l.) ~ ~.'~ / ~~. r ~ /''iii' :.. ,, ~.. , ., t rq z: a.~ ~ ~' y LE:Em ..ol an.,u . w. errc.mm wu wr D.Y. nl.,,o®T - ~ +,o. . noaN[ fGa d ru.) - - •-. no: +p ~,. y }'~l.~T.::l.'~''' . . z ~- ,~d. w ~.. w a +Z ~~; .,.E ~W E:- ,' - ~~ti. ° ~-aa :a ~~ GUARDRAIL DETA~ (SNOWCAT DfU B 's 3' CONCF~EZE PAN D ,t TYPICAL 6SSE WALL A1~ ~~~ WWI O • ~~ ~' > yr wq r~ IgNING TWO ADJACENT 91 T 1"w-^^'1 "^~ ~^i4 ~ _ ~.m r.+ n°/ nO/. „ TOP NEW - ....~~.~"•:.:~' ~~.`... . eENSPFfTIYE NFW n ~ 1^'~ '~' nGw~ ~ ks w :4+1 ~1. ~vl f~o~ Wes. i..F.os~F.c ~4Mao; nwn we oc .~m.~ o: ~ ., ' ' it rn rwr ~N~r~'. . Sa.T FBJCE DEiA~ PATH 1 SNOWCAT DRIVEWAY. PROFILE H(YLZ 1',- SO' ,_ _ r r- I i _ _ ._ ~ a _~_______ -~.Yr,-is .. Q W.. ':;W:.:;. tAU`.: <¢O w . Q Q ~. U 2..U.N.'Q ;> z=-~ O -. N , aa.z J •1 ~,N J.:: ~ Q !t. ~.:. v~. ~:=: Lil Q H ~ F O ~ Z _' ~. o .: Q .'~ tr ': C9 ': ~_ Q N Lf') 0 0 N N m ~~ ~~~ ~Q~ ~~~~~1~ ~ l~Q~~~ ~~~ -. 4+ 00 ~( 8125 8125 8100 8100 -40 -20 0 20 40 ~_ m ' CDwxNDS BuS+,C SS C[N ICN P.O. BOA 91 O COwxADS [LION /.DO 616!7 0 ' (910) 976 -]f )] il.i (9 )O) 926-!]90 ~ GRA ~ E ~ PROPOSED CUT WALL CRADE ~ PROP FILL SED MSE ALL ~` `` ~~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ SNOWCAT PATH SECTION STATION 9+00. 9+00 8200 8200 8175 8175 -40 -20 0 20 40 ~® CDXARO$ BUSwE55 LFHICR P.O. BOIL 91 • CDwM05. CQORADO 616f3 (910) 976-~57] fA[ (9 )0) 936-5]90 Ex15Tl G ~ GRAD PROPOSED PROPOSED WISH GRADE \ \ PRO OSED SASE FILL ALL v n 0 0 rn' rn ~ ~ `~®~r~ ®~ ~l~~a8~ 8180 8160 8140 ~~$~~~i~~ ~~68 ~~~~~~~~ EXI TING GR DE ~\ ~' ~ ' ' PROPOSED ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ /•• - ~ j -~ ,; \ ~ ' ~ jj; ~ ~ P OPOSED FINISH <:>~ ~~ G ADE ~; ;~ ~~ .j~ ~ PROPOSED ;~ ` ~ ` GUARDRAIL ,, '%%s 2 % ~ %~~; ,. ~ ii :::. :....:.: ,, :.... -::: _ ,: ` ~~. R~0 SED~vfS ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ , FILL ALL ` ., ~ ., ,. , % ; ~~ ~ r.. ,~, j ~ \~ 25.00' PATH ~- ~ ~ 4.00' SHOULDE ,\ - \ -40 -20 0 20 40 8180 8160 8140 SCALE = - HORIZ- 1n = 10' = =_ VERT- In = 10' = - ED WARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX. 97 EDWARDS. COLORADO 81632 (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390 --~. -, " a:~~, ~~~:: E~ i t ~^4 ~$Y :. ... ;~ .~~.. ~~,~Y~tityw ~ r ry,;.~~~ ~ t ~ l k Ya$., *~._ $6 { 4 ft 4 'g4. 5 t k1 t'' ~~~.'(~' c3 s -~ ~'yri F ~ ~ .. i r'~' ~"`~r~39 -irk '~ I ? ~~-'~~?^~*zii`~j:~ ~~ '~r}. ~~:~ ~ .Gtt~ , , , N~r.A?~,,. i }"q :ti~'.1,s 7. ~'w ~,,..,.<Y,i~., x. _ ~.Tx.. .~,.~ ~4,. ~.i!ia~v',a~itY.~Gyr'fbv J.'~~ ~~1 `~`~.:. S ~. ~i.u r."~i` ~j ;~~~, x- '& ,~ ~~~~' ~ ~~ ~ ~:,. ~; 8~.~ ~,~~ ~~ ~~ ~ - -..-.5~. .;~~,t '~5n~ r 'S r ~k W. .... l THE PIPlilE©S~'~TE?~Ji ~ ~ ( y C ~v ~1.: ,~r f~ 5-• 1i .. av F!ma .,.C ~`3" } T ]'Hi 4~ R_ .m '. "'. ~L_"1 . ~i..-1.US < C ~~L ' . . . F ~"1~,j~CL~1fJ 11L' l~cinillillt' 1t'flll ~ 1>lr'1R~ 1~ ~ ~'~ S~N ~ ~' ~2(tltrl 1 I(>f~l lll~~l (>It c111U11t? 1 I"Ct1r il'(lll '~ ,. l,~~e ~Y11f ~ ~ s ,al `~ r~'" ~ -~ , ~ ~, +,. ra c~;let11 :(~~'tltlnt' ~1~rall. L IIt~ r/1 t'. r b~s ~4~kg) ~931 aj~y ~ ~~fFa~~~~, s '~ ... ~ 8 h 12' d x i8 w `,, ~~' ~ r f v A ' ^ - - Iv.`tFt ~ X 1 t t ~~ ~~', ~lNc~ltCrl l'C/ llltilltl111Cr~lllr-U1111(C/Pbl c ~200mf11X300mR1X450fllmJ; yr ~~~U,~' a -r ~~,~ ~~ ,1,111 t'i c>{~~~~ tll~ nlrl tt'i~llcl c 11nr ln,~~of>~a r 1 ~^;y!. 4aa:. -- ~ayF~r rrckh 'ir~~~. we t70. 1~,~.v ~r -,t , ~jY tiS '' _ J: d~ ~11R~~~'~' ~NL~~` u~y~ 3 A ?~i7c~"} ~i^~ 11i r1 ,(l I1 [1"r1Jt((1 ,ti j-41dt (tll t'~. -~ ~~+~~itieF" '~ tP ~ ~ ~ ~fyt'd' n ~+a3 ~ ~-u i ~ ~' .f ~ n r ~,~ak-iTS>tJ ~ ~A `16~,y.~`~'^ra §' i ,r 1 w ~y. ~ J r '~• ' ~,, N >-?r v L5.'-i". v Y `%"Te t~~ ~ rf 7{~t,?,,~~'Lj#,:tr~.,74~~z. ~'~'" I7 _. s~~d >. ' ;N3 ~r:z~x~> ~.~,t~ ~ ~ ~~,~'.,~~' ~~, ' 111ecltizJti` ~lnit ~~ ,n~ ~, x* _ ~4" dt'~t~ SI' a~' ~~1'~t LC~ a ,.k „t ~"Y.. +.r _3Y -~•~~`'s~ rn.~ q 8 Ib5 26.k 1 ~•..y-..L~~>~ ~ .~ ,~.W ~r~~ „:a s iJ1eti:. ~d ~u, r,~Gy ~ ' f"C" a~ Y r t' pt~F~' ~Y~'.1 45 rs, 4~ ~' '4` n,~ r" ,~ a a , s r~ay~i+{~~t~J:~c" 7:~n ~ i.~". rr .~i..~ ,, F-y' ., ~-r7 .ae':$~~t'4.,1~r.+t ~,yl ~^rsp Y v . ~ ~ 8 h.~X 12 d X;11 W ~ ~... ~,a~~"tj.~ ~;.A`;'t q~~.v,~<I"a.:. ~k~,~ snd~ ~ ~ ~ fit.. ~!!"7~-lWtr~1 ~4'.i`Y}!e f. `~"~ s+ 4<. .'+'t`3 X~-~L1~t .~Suf L -aT h :: ~~ ~ ~(^.~Y'~YnJv~~ ! E } `°~`..r ;,~,fii , rl~ ,'~sc.~ a},°rt'~'t~., i~v~~ k 4x~?~,yru, ~~. ~~ .'v~;:'; 2~~` ~ (zoo.mm x 3oomm~x z8omm) ; _ ~~ir ~"~u,a.'S~ . ht` ~t+ ' a ~;:, r, "~i~b~ .,el ar~ >_ dry ;n "~.~ 1' ~i~il<~+rs:,"~r,-~a~.s~r7~~' ~"t~' tia> ~{'~~, y x-~;'a~'~ aYi~ ,T ~~ 3 <~ ~... 8 ~ t x1 /~~ ~y,1.~ 14t ~ /Y~+.3~!J$Y 't' ft~ 1 'a:! !+ 4 ' ,~ ~~/ ~vs°t~Y <: 4~R'dfx t 1~V 3`^~ ~r A~vl 1 a y l x~ .P, 4 " rs r' x ~ ~t~'~'"' ;~~r~ ,~~ a~, ~X ~~4 r k'~ it.~t,`~ ~a~,; itc '~~ ~1~ 3 ,. ~'+~f s ~rF~ ~~ ~~:? to ~.. ~ a~ ~F~a~'i tn~7'aaa .(~~t~lr .,~,~, ~i'~'»~dl~~-3`'gl~}p~~7 c~ t`~ t'~~ , i T;jS ~al,~ n a' r .i Ix-. ::.Y~~~7 e~d u~l ry ~"r ~'~` ;, ~d~ A ~ w1 ~*,afl,~«7.y - a~~~~y~ i _ , ' ~ - ,+ ~~ f Zn~.4'c~•7. ~: - ~ ~5# Y +'~ ~, f~ta'~''~, d~a ~'4~"~fy~~."C r s r c ~c +"' 'A " ~ ~ s -yl T ' ~ ;r ~ ~^" ~ ~y ~' ~i ~~ fhr -a '~ r +, 't!}ft ~><' ~i r:. ,t ~,, far' t ry ~~T, ~ i Y h ~:>,, ~. ~ z~ t ~ ~`ti~ ~L~, t ~ ~~ f N-~'.7: Yt•H. ~?li;~ r`~~i~k tc ~(~ ~i~'~Dr>;~L'~~e..R~~,u~,u~~1 ~Y'a1F Pt~~.,,, br ~f" r£L ~. -.~~'R-k N"~.~. ~'. ~ }S4+t A ~ l \F.N 77 ~,~_ ~~ ;, ~w~'~t "'~'~~a'~ ~ r~ . .:.~ y¢~fifny~n ,~,f~ ~`t~.~ ~ ~~ Y ~ ~ ,~ rl F~ «, ~~,s.•~~ !r' 3 s,~yZ~T~~- ~~^f7~l~rs,a a ~~~f;'f"s ,N ~,~~@~ , 4 ~F,.°~ ~. ~ ~ .~.. :~ 1 r~..l ,~, w.. z~#Til ~,g ~ •~~xt 5.~1o`~'(P.4i~ r~ ~ ~..r3.d l;Vl '~,'Ori.A t~~ESL~d~'H~'`"'~,_ .riZ^ '-/ 1 t f ~F ~ - ~i J~ y .~~.^~'. S~nall IIr_,ut ~ ~xrPri~t ; ,>. .w , "4t .w~`~'-a-``4qe"` eft- ~ w." w'Y~ .s }i. ~~, >+ rn y'Y .~ ~7t:#..~u .r lF y1 t ~ r •~ n 5t'4 '~ 4- ~. t +.' ~ ~ '-z't (' rY} :~~~>i ^,~'RG'~~~~~~.r,'3 5v '`r«a"i ~' : ;7w -uis. y ~ - ~~ 37 lbs (17 kg) ~'~~> P !,y ,~y Ftkn~r ~~tt.~BA~~~I'~~*'zY~! /~R ;`{ Jy~"ir,~f~A~t~fAi,._ ~SM~r~f ~~9p~: ~ ~}{ Est+~x, ~}r. `*t ~ i ~:. ;, -~~' v ~R~~'s~'v,,s ' ~ 1~'~;`E'lr+~'+,,~""i, `''{.~ ut~ a~.. 3fi i TT~°~~'~~i'~- ~j~ g h"`X 12 +d X'.7 W (u ~~~at-.~~'.~'~x~ ,t s' > ~, <6 ~#~. s"f'a~~ "'-rJt t ~ r~ `~-~.rxj``~k ». .r'~~~>.yY,x~r ~,r~~ f~ • ^t~,~~}z ~h (zoomm JC 3oof[lm x l8omm)Y ~. ~ ._~ , a. a7 ,- , ~, r„, n:. `~W ~~ lrt~J!>l4 k ~~'~~~~ " ~`~'`"-) ~'~v4~iV~ D /~rJ'~+'kGa ~~rP~s4 fN q`rf" + i '~~5',t~~~x, Y+ "'~ ~..3545'i'r ~` ,^x~`~.-v'tfa ~t ~3~ ,~'. Ctt"s"b¢~~ ,. ~~t'kr-""'~~`i~x ~~u ^~i'r'~i~ r ~ti>~ yafx~: ~: r -,~~`v ~'+L~'xed~ +'! ° i z¢~xa sra ' 3~' ~ +.s a ' ^a'~' ~}~ ;w"rv ~' a}' 3 } ~: v,tL ; l 7" ia,5.`,t1~ ~iT E-t~.;~.aa~.~-~'- "' 3-r~~~,.....+s~i q~~~'~tl r e7 - 1. ` , :. "5t ~, v - f ~ ~ ~~, ~+~r1r~~ e ~1aq .~{'w~,~a~~„~ ~ v~,~~rra~ F ~.7~,~,'.°,?r`~~~'''" t<: ~ >r +;,L<M '~ E'~~P 1 ~, r e '4,. C 4. ~y~f'}>• ~ir 3 f0.gt ~i'~tY~ ~~,~~3c ~:. 9 ~ ~ r ~,r~ 1, s `F kr. j %r'- rat ,ta, i - ~t ~r t ~ v ~y'~'~~`~v~0~ r l~r~~ "~5~~'~~ qu.°,<3%~tA ~rQ.y~~"'~t~3°~~'~~ ". ~~"~~~ ~a~n1~~3` ~ a2 ~ t~ r+ r rry. u *~ ~ - r ~` ~ Yreay?A~{, ~~r~~d ~+~.~+f ^,,~"~`fr w, - .r. r. v ..?'re lc ~~"4 ~v. ~1r l~,t~~.-.: ~ ~~ F . ,w ~'ia~,~f, ,~uF~~~~. ~'. a=q ~. , , ~ ,t '~ ~,1 ~, [~,,',~ ti: ~~~ ~~ c`. ':lw~.+,~wv ~~{~~ 'C,. r .cF,i~k:.+k~ I'+ 'K,e a y ~ ~u -~5+`i :- ., ~' y~~ ~,, r 1 r ~ ' .:`'a~° pay - 3`y~,~E.~i +"~ 'p"Jtfyl~~~s3' ~§"- eu~`~i' l¢~'r 9~ ,u~}~~'r`y ~'`~rrF a.. a,CT~~ t . r, '`~~-~'u~u ~'~;`~ .t.' Ta.. };. _ 7~je'+'~. '";nd; a,+,i•,~tm4. -~' e ~s nn+ "Y~, •1 ~'tsi.•,< ,.+G-n r .~ r ~.. , h ri 'fY~k'flj 7~r t_` ' "'' ~~'~'- f~ { 'fir #'wx ~`` $~~.~~~r>ta~".#, ~~~N>~ rl~R:'`~>`'Si~t, ° Cep jJ121t t ~~ r tr d~ ~ ' r-`. a 71r.~~rt w ~;~ f ~ ~~f ~.~~.-x T''*~.Ti~t~~?N""'~~ ~"j r t .t .~c`'b~1~k-s~.7.~ Y`~s,.l~~r~r_ - ~ fr f +h~ .~e'i"° ~ `i, ri ,z '~ r r~ 1 ~- ~ 9 +.y Fi{i~ t , ~ L~k~; . .. . . yy a'~ ~,~ ` ~~~.e.,z,.y ,~ '~=~.r"~ a, ~~ r~ ~~~~ "f.,.:; (two:sidestextured) '~'L ~' 3; : . _ fi z°y ~ '~ ~ ,, .~, .t ~~;. ~'~~"r.s~'~'s~+ ~ 3 (4~. S) j y ~~rl'~ °~ 3 v,. ~,~~ • F pUT aY~~y~'~' ~4"xn'r~ Af~Y i~:~t5x i s~ i, n w 1 f e~+u'c Q 1b5: 1 k ~ P 'iz ~'g `.k1 'u ~ ~ 73"a 1 '~ 1 ~J ,. z r ~~`F1 tr r rs .f'. ~' 1 BSc ~'rlx fL,f-- .~.,. ~.. ~ m n,, to r-s sr ~ .+ ~,~~ . + T~.f/~p°L ~`.3~T arse ~y~ 4 ` k ~~'',, ~ ~~} 7 4. h;.x 12 d X 1!{/8 w } dY' ~a"~'-~t~,'d~~^"-~~ ,c,~ i1 t t V r' "~ F ~~~fF~~ f LS=7 A~ 5 ,..I~'... 1 Wv'.:.lF~ LF ~ _ - l ~~Er? "~v ,.~i~+. ~+•'F> ~ ~ r ~,,~~,~~ ~~~u~,~ ~~ ~ '~ _ ~ r (loomm x 3oomm x.355mrn/2oornm) ~„~~,,.~~"; ~, cnx z ,*.~., hi ,.rl~ 7n~' t !~ k'~' 4~"v~t 244 1'T 4c~ .. r ~, eK~'~' s~ ~! ti ,a r t~ ,a~~;w'' ~tersi;n~.J ~l+eci~l~ tllli Ir~l 'irrllc~`.._tt rtll ~ ... ~ ±, '~ , + ~~ YJs , . +1~ ~ In~~+li+~ ~Irlt~tttr~~~ rl~tcl:1 ~ ~ 1 ~-. , Positive 1Vleclianical Connection with ;. , ~ , , ~ y ;_ ~ ~ ,~ Keysto~ze FZberglass. Pir2s , ~ ,., a r r~ttr~711~ Geufuty~ltc~ll'tilEnd~ rurl ~~ ~h r h c_ r1 a ti rir~~ r 1 I~e lo,01l a;n d clcz~ n ctc l r l l ~~ ~~ - .Uerticral e'r Bcatter-ed Wall Aligm~ient Options ~ as: r ~~. ~ _llt!(Illlll ~l(~llr' til'llll ~IIlItIlJlrtl 111I~~1'Ill' - ri SiYP1~lZC1ty0f C014St9"uCtion x I n.. ~ _ llltll ICI~.I (~1( l~llll[1 lll(~ll U1111(li'Ilt~.:' ~~ , s I r' ~~ ~ a Wall Solutions fa~orn Gravity to ~.,- ~~~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Soil Reinforced ~ '~ ~~ L c},ID~ lw-.~.. ,...,.~ -...x ~ ~ _-L._.. a.,bu. •n..._ ~. w+. ,;3tv~ c.i7..uw. , a _ ` ,~... Mk .oiW ~' y z. *unit dimensions, weight and color may vary 6y region `1 • 4 ~' T Ti-i~ Pl~dt~1ED SuST~M ~,> ~',/dE'tit' Y-P;~~rzrT~C.°P`t~/i!Y isCr1~s(ld','P..S?Lf'.G4.';l'c~:_ S:,;i"~'tP~~.~/l!C~I;'lf"t"(~i,i' "1?ZEYa;dt-lLE`S ' 1 ~~';,~"~,~, ~. ~~$ _ u ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ty T ,' a" ~ ~ `: i ~ ~ =F ~~ jsY'~`-t? '` ~ "'~ ~~"~' yam ~' ,~ .~:~ ~ .~ F 3 ..ti rrY~ti M.\5 .t~- ~ ~ ~I qp ~~''' to s. 5 ~~^~Tr~~ ~~~' ~°~ C w . ~x ~' ~rT.3e.Y4~C~r ribe~~glass Pia2s 5 - 1/4" (130mm) long , 1 - 1/4" (32mm) shoulder length 1/2" (13min) diameter at pin shaft 3/4" (20mm) diameter at shoulder High strength pultruded fiberglass ASTM 4475-85 Short beam shear 6,400 psi (44 kPa) For more clenic~ndi.rig structtitral npplicnti.ans, Centtir}~ ~~~~iI] cues key connectors for tnechanic~l fasteners of HDPE cr PET geogricls. THE PINNED SYSTEM ~s~~~~~~ t~~ li r~ r9 L't `k -. __ __ __-_ v ~,. ~ :411 C z .,. i , -. - atl`ff ~~ ~ ~ ~ r t I i 1~1C i1~7C.1 v]IT~S pill. / t~ :lac .l~r J~II ,t 1_i'~ ]l ~l {F~ l -t(i1,~jf~1L ~L1~C 001/1 ~ 1 ~ ~~~ _ 4 _ _ •_ xt rid ~ ,lr..~ ~~~~~,U 4 """ s -~u = ~~, -did FY t a7 ~ • u'1 '-`~ ~ ~ F'9 °&~. ~~ 4 t_ x'14" 'i J/S ^4. ,~,,N U s. ~r ~•,,}~F .~2~Y' ~~ ~i •. - -J' C r ir.. f ~ t~.1~j~~nCe's.~~"~ y~"~'y{~y*a ~ r rho>. a~~7{ ~.~!'M,t~;-:l~ 5 i S~ ~ {~3 ^yn~ ~t 1~ t'x~A`~ay1 a J*^k ~ ~ 1,Sk 'N 4 ] Li ~'S7._ 2 ~ ~ ~ .. .~i~~~t P ~ ~~~~'t S" ~~ 13 'T,{~ ~,r~.w ~x '` r,~2t~F5 ,~r3L~' tr .e v t f?~ x:i.. e,~^ .,J<''kF~k. ''.t:~~~~ s~ A ~,•. ~~ ~` Y. -"es. _. .. ~. ''~.`~~ ~.,~ ~,t.Y q.,.. ~ ~~4 it w .~.ux~ ~a'J:S `,TC!fJ,r. '~~ S l a Y • _ ..~~ i ~,sr ~'~rr h ' tYr ~l~ , I j F1+.ll~ x 1 ~ s ~ ~ i . ~ . K'~ `~ n k M" Y~j i 7~ a' t ~ ' ;. f r i y - Y t .. ~ c*. < ~. , z ? r r .y ? ~. .. .x 1~.., . ,. ...- t ~ r~ ~• ~'>~xr^ fur` s °1' v* !~. ~ `z~ Y3, Etc"'' s rss! £ tr+- ~ r~i e'k~~-'~~C ~r, tea":, ~rt ~3~,C'~-~~ n .^z 1:. ,~ ~+i ~'~,r. RR X~ ( '1 ~- l f l ~! _-b_ S .-.) L '~ ~a~j~~^~F`~E'~ ~1 ~fT qq~~x%~.f ~ ~1"~ ~Y 3:r b r ~r i ,` "' ~ ~t Iv !N 9r s~'~'r`:t£ t5 ~ ,44y`'1m+i7 i~ ~~~ ~s~ ~i :. ~-• ~.k;_`c}~ q r~ is v,~'h,~' - ;4a - ~' ..~4. F~ 4 r ~ ~ a y,w hYrt ! : t~"S-~t` ~z {Y4 titer ~~~" .~ ; fit: _ ~° j ry b- " 1 ~ ~ ~.. t 'S r>~ r .~ ~a" +.~2 ~NK K; ,• ~ 'tom ~f .1 '~'«,~ r ~°: ; r -•vS r; ~ tl, ~ ~, .ash-.~~ ~ ~ ~n "`a ~ `~ ,r ti .~~1'u ~! v ~ ~m~~.~.~'w.. r'~' ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~x~ ~4 ~r v 9 dtiu~t,' t'y7 ~r."-~,.al,~~ir~ ~ t "ry ~` ~ ~" ~ Y °I STl'L ,r,~ q 4 { ~- 1 .'7 ~ • ~C*FE ''~hC~..[ ~. `~ b d•y,t~2 t,. s' '13 ry 'y.~s y S I .n4" SY ~I s a ed..~,n'r ~ ~ 1~' ~evxf - t i~'!vY ~t t 7iq ~ t~.~. Y4 1 - < ~e y ! -pte. . x .' 1~ ac: ~ x '. x ~ ~) !k . W~~ a ' ~ ~ S, f• ! ~ -;~ ~ ~ r a ~F. ti-!•'1l ,r ,~c.,iien { b ~ :. ~ ~ * ~' r fr,!'S• a ~~Fr ,Js' r~`~~;fcl` ! ~~ ~ar7s a ~+r-3~1 s' r ~~y-7 F n' , ° 3Y~'r s, x` ~', ". " •~k.Y, `s. ~ 'COY ' T~ ~~ « gat x a se`~ . ,. ,Y~ .. 3~ f ~ ' ~,~. ~' +1 s ,a .'d s gym. .~ x, z . '?u" .~ I " ~'~!t Once the ms la}e been inst illud prop rde 1 /?' ` .Pl.ice~the nett course of Century Wall unr4s over 1 :`Clean. off the last course of .Century Wall. }n ; P ` ~s' '3/4.- :(10 _ : 20inm) crushed etonc ,'dr usage ,fill ' ,the fiberglass pins fitting the pins mto,tlie long 4..~ .preparation for the cap or coping to finalize the.', behind the units to a minimum dcptli of 12 ,'receiving channel recess of =tlie' amts above <wall With unrts';dry and. de1n; use Keystone" {', (300mm). Fill oFen spaces 6etwecn unrts acrd open Pcish/pull tFie (.cntui`r ~Uall amts toward the F ;~Kapseal construction adhesive or equal fora `_ ` cavities/acres with" the same dramas e material face oC the wall anal the channel v all makes full ; mechanical bond.l Install the Century Walll 4'' _' ProceeduYplrcebacltillmml~inutm"S (200nfii~) contactwrth'theptnsr ~~-) 1100min) capping amt. archrtectura] precise , ,.,, layers and"compact to 97°io StatxlardYtuctorwi~h concrete or cut-stone a5 a coping element Cap-; '.`- thrappropriate compaction equtpmeht. Note: Do ~ may be flush or overhanging as required ~by ~. , not :run hea ~ itde-on,.com acpon e ui ment ' - `` - -~ - ` r `aesthetics and design withiri 3'-0" (lm) of back of wall - , ` °"` GENERAL NOTES. ' • Units may vary due to texturing processes and unit sizes by region. Verify 'Cut or split units as required (with a mason saw, hydraulic'break or unit type, size, weight availability by region. Units may vary up to l" ± chisel and hammer) for corners, caps or wherever units need to be altered (25mm) due to texture variations. to allow construction to be finalized. • Clean out pin holes and receiving channel as required to assemble wall.. • When cutting concrete units, always wear safety goggles, gloves and filter ' ' _ ~ ' During manufacturing, some concrete crumbs may deposit in these areas mask per manufacturer's recommendations. '; and should be removed to permit pins to be placed in the appropriate r ,. holes and receiving channel. -3'' ' ~~' i'HE PiNPJED SY~ i EPJI ~ ~ ` • ` ~- ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ t ` ' holes to ~;achteve the desu, ; use t11ts mrterial~'rs backlrll liter selechn; the end (xrth -front corncr,~ fouchu{g) oil; the' , ~+ ; ~ locatrorr and lengt}r of t}{c ~~all eacas•atc t}ic IJaSO 1 prepaicd base; The stde'!of the wilt wrth the long ,' he Century Wall,-units .] t ~,t trench to the d~signed,nrdtli and depth Start the ~' grop« (revetvtn~ chr.nnvl) near the front face of ; ` :most hgl,e(s) for ;near;.' ; ~+. ~ at the lo~~'esT~ e1c~ anon .alonb wall 1 ~ levelmg~ pact the unit should be placed down and the open pm the holes nearest the en . i ahgnnenL Step `~iip in ~" ~(200mm) 'increments ." holes should"face up; as shrnvn .Make Sure' each : setb5ek per course, =~ t v .' wtth the;base as reyutred rit cl ~ation`chingcs in ' 'mot rs level - side to sole and;front to'.baek. ~ ' bevel the pnparcd U'vse ti'rdt 8 ' thefoundatlon Leveling the frsl course;ts mttcal-.for accurate and ~' . ~; . 1 .. compacted granolas: fill (gravel, (200mm) of well acceptable tcsiilts ]-or, aligmventiof stnightnvalls, , , or ll2" to 3l4 ;(10 20mm) crushed ~ ~~~' road base, usc'~astrm lui'eposthonedalongtheumtyinholcs". ~ . PStOne) .COIDp1~t~ 10 97°it Standard - f ~.7 r~fUr ~aCGUiaCy~ lV~1rll311um embedment Of~ b"1Se r ( greater'l~o not uscl'I 1 GI 1 ~' ' ~~~ v rs _ -rn)belowgrade } Ievelm~ pavi. ~~ ~,: ' ,~ *~a.»__ ~ ; r rr~+7~~ ; ''t - \ ,~ ', Y '1 ~ ~ f i'! i ', >> stGi1i D}rri`; I i;:~~.,/..~~~:rlrt~a~ialC.curc~ ~ C r,,, ~ .{ v °/ czppu r u C~lall' - , . t ri .~~, 1 , dCll ~ - x 14 - . s ...,~$,,,,.~ ~,~,X^ - ~ - i`~ ~ -~ }T YP~ ' S + ~ ."~'"-tr--'°~•+"~~ '~:sxz ~.,y~~-^,,y-.- -~K - ~ghSF'~smc r~ ~~~{Y` ~~~~ ~ ]f&~2JI ~{'F...:~~C1/e •`~r~'-' `~} n •~, --- .. ~, z, ~,« ~. ,~~« ~,~,, ~r .--~-- 1~OS~t1 ~ L C Cl~l{I ~,CGll Z Dt2`12~ /'F1~ ~ ~.~.~',#r,~~,+. ~ 1~~ (r-..1•~,a, __„~>a•{:j~''~~ ~~''~~ ; .. 2 .. ,-~~ K~~o~ ~'~~' '`~j-A . 1~7.c~" err ~.~~~ .9{`%r?r ,; ~ fr ~ .: ~ { E' ln~ilt {n il~~{iinust for th C:cnhuti \tia ll Stistcm and unuse5 sJr~'i ~ that`cach wii~t is secuely mterlocl_cd within the'wall f ~ce Jn ~~ ~ ~ addition, tlvs unique pinned s~stein all~ows~for a mechanic il ~ -';'~ amsie~tion i~ith ~co ud soil resnforcement, ~securmd its ' -. { ~ ~ . ` x ~~alc lil ~ _~ I InItC al]d: Ll~()N'Lna f0[ ~~ i)17CC tCRSIOn ~ `~t ~ fd~~v;. ! OI t~]E < Cl~ ~ .. ~ '~"1~r ~ ll~," ~ 22 L t (f4 [ {++po-~ -~~~,r ,yam 4 .~W..'ui " 1 ~ { 1 '~°'n ~ " -' 4 ~ tu r`;~gS i11C { II ~ ~ U]L ~a I I "S ]117~~C11~~'l llt ~C.1tU CC5 ~ ~sls ~:~ y4,i~,.,ti ~. ~ ~~ ~a'~u~~ nccdcd but n{it ~l" ins found n. ,{ s~~nxn(sl i~rcmin mall. 7 he _ fy4 :~' ' ' ~ ~" f ~ , ccnt:~ ~rnc uci of C cntui 11 all ~~irn ides in ohcn ~cll in ~~hxti ~ i< • :unit d{~u>>~c;fill is"placed addiii~ weight, [acialstabq{ty,and F '~ addition it ~nt~rlock ~ foi ~ uh ,~~s 11 module. This b~ a~•cT` fill _ liiovides i critical hvilum as:'a drvi~~i~e"filter whic~ ~v_ ~ ~ M alle~iatc h~~~irostrtic presswcaiic t~ iii ~ i ~~ the ~i i . ._t ~ ~°z ~~ ,n+ ~. tivthiiith~~~lllt~~c.` ~~ v - ':.I ' ~. " ~d=P ~'GI1'dC~Jtt2 iJldlf"~II~CL'~)dEtlf '~ Cenfury \1'aIl's random fa~~ appc~rancc pro~sdes the lout: of t h srid lard stone with the d~ssgn'and construction advantages found in a segmentll retauung walla Three. facing elements .. ' ' ; ~ :: ~ P ,: 3 . in height, with varying widths from 7" to 18" each ~ ~ randomly placed within the -wall, give Century Wall the ~~'+ , ~~.~", r- , ~„ ~~ character of a natural stone wall. All Century Wall units are 1 1 ~ 1l" deep providing the stability required for constructing q ~~~~ Tr= taller wall structures. R ~ ~a~"~~,E >4 ~, _,~, ~F ~~: 5 d :. ~ & 1 5 '~ ~- ~,! T~~ 13lrara~~ svsr~rl~ ~._ - ;:- T LLT.ii,. ":~1 P~ f l~M~. ~~'x;: 1~,. t J ~ ~ + ti ~, x~~ ~~ ' M s! E , -, ~ ~Kr~''r'F~Y't i ~ ' ' p ~3 .~ i4, t . L ~ _ J x r f ~ .ZY F 1;- ~ ~s3~ ~/F rt n n nI rt( ~Y~ ~II~~~~I~~~t1. i~ ~ ~ ~ -C ~ ? "~ il , i ~ll'+ ~' x p. u~ ~ ~~ (/ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ q ~`. `~IyrJ ~` 1 ~~'f~': n ' ' 1:.. 1; v~~ ~.. ~i ".V F = ~ Y 1.i ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ F 3 fi { 4+ ~ ~ r`. ~,~' > ~ 1 ~, ~ - a v yr aarfr7 z 5, ~,~ Ef.. '}3 '.~ ~f N~ !~ 7 ~aj.s~~. . ~d `; -J _ Wis..>; ~ L " G. .~., sir ,~-_ a 1 ~- # ~ 1.~. r2 .a _."~~. ~: 5,r " { r .~ - z i - ,~ a~ ~; ~ F . ~ 5y d { ~ •~ p~. T!~`~_ 4. ... ~• ~ t ~ ri ~ r ..yt~.aw>; r ~~~ ~ '~~ ~: ~. t~s F ~ i ~" $ ~ 1 1 :;. ,, ~ ,~~, ,, ~.. :~~'. 3~,~ .} v,1 ~yi, /~ tom/ 7 ~ s 1 ~ { ~ ~.'. i 'i 31~i. ~. ~,)s~ii i ~, l ~~`° o-~;, t,~>~ i~ rF ~ t::l F - ~d. g~~ N4444. r @. at .-.. r~~ i;_ ~F. t fi' .~3Y ai` ~ r ~~3 x ' ~~/e~qp,~ ,. .. k3i tit ... w~ 5 ' a #~~ did a ~. Large scale units for tall ~tiall applications with appearance of natural stone. z., - - - - - - r ~_- -- - -- _ _. ,,.r-. r _ ,_ ~~; ~~ _ A 'y~r°'1YR~h ~ ~.ryt '~ '°z' ~',".~", u.' v~`~ M;~i ~ g, rr'~T a~f~ir,F q r ~r C~''_ .. ', ~ ;,'F ~r1es ~ 0 1.~.._.m .,.. Y ,^#R r ~ ~~~.~~!,,~`~ ..~ e -'=.31 ^''tr 1# N tlrt - , + ~~ ~ r, sti 'T A- F3Y~q r i~ ~ r ~• ~.~~~ x- t~v,h rs-i' H 'J:, do n "~~ :eta) ~ ~(rt';~ 7: ~- ~~~ pr ~/"~tl V Y ~~1~ - ~T~ R ~. yo,1. ! ~J~ ~ 1 + `tiff ?`a' --•~...~...~ i ~~ i' ~k~~ ~+ `~' 1! ~ _ : ~ _ ea Tom' `' ~k ': is -"_ L 4' ~Y ?~1aK ±~~ ~}~ Y ~~ ~j ~~~ ~~ ( f f`~ ~ .M014 f ~ (, ,y~-, a ' ~ h _ ~ ! yp~, P ~ ~ t)P1G ~ i~~Rc,~, ~~,.~I1l~Wa~r~ . Si^'~F~ ~ rA i ...r~ '~ ~. . ~:! -' Y' ~.`. .Y __ ~~J~.. -~ ~ ,R"~r'15~ dl~f''r~':'~ Y~ rf tir~.~a ~~., ~'~~.,Q~~,~IT/~ -S ,1~.~ ~z. ` ~ ~ .n~ l~.ib~, h ~. ,' ~~ ti- ~.~ _ 4 ~. ~. ~:~~ n ~ rL ~ g4~ d ~ t~ r '~ '' ~~ 1 1 ~ r. 1 c ~);'do iJ.~'y rr .,~~ li ~ ~ , ~.~~ rr k ~a..c ., I 7 A ~ f,<i, ~ ~ ~ ~ 'a'~'~ ~:.•~~''~'~' r y ~ `i~r ~~ ~,~ ~ >~ ;yt G <:.,ors- J ~ ~ ~ ~ r ,~; : ~ 7 ~ ~ , ~ ~ a '~ a ~ ~ i,.,~ ~ F ~ ~, . r --+ ' , '_ ~ ' pp r _~ ~ ~ ~ , {~ d35- ~ :-'~ ,~ 't Y ~ iij ~ i N - .~1~.,r3T'i+ r ~;' ~ ' } ~,~L,m„2,.,,'-_' ;~ " , r mac'- .y l~ti Ir ,,~~ `\+.i ,r r [w:"''f-"''dtigw,,'~i~" ~, ~ s"~~.-r -~~T.~-. ~. ~»>. 'tv'E" y''~'K•..' `r--1_~-_ ---' .. ~ zi ' ~ J ~ J rtr,. ~~; t .G'st' ~. * z ~ u~z~. ti . -acct' ` ;/'-'~ ~,"~,! 1 c ` u ~ %~ 1:. -'~~ L' __"' ~ }. `"'4yf1R~1''4 '~~'i Ys1r~,1±. ~ e _ _-i .:`* x ~X~ rL rr 'rte ~ ~ F. J .C .. t _ F" r S. 5 ~ L ~ rn i //"J t f j`,~ ,~II , i~ S •' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ a +~ ~ 1: w t !e:4,~{ rJ Ufa; a~l:K .~5+'4 ,,•~ „r r,', ~ ." s~b•,.. i '~r ,kt~~r ,~.. 44 ~ = h-at~Gr G ..~+_ '-~d~5F ~ ..,>~E ~ f,, T .`i'`~ ~'~.-, .~. ~~ rk +'• ~~sf' d e r i t i t x r a-. o r ~ 4 ~~ '~l ~ r~. t ~'. ~. (y a P r t 1 f t~ J c _. +, _~ ti ~ i~ . ,j ~ ~. i .a ..;,._..a.,,,,,, 3 ~ ~ t;..~., J ~. ~-i 'C 5 tt 1.. ~~'i.?N' .'l~i+ ~~ l _~ 1~.. 15 ~d. 1 9 (,~~.~tr ._y~'.Kr'~~s ar-~. ... ~'t Csp 4 f`i"h 6.5+~1r ~ r ~r r~. f k0a<'- y YS'~ „~ ff"S`~3- 7e~ _ . F ~ 6 i t +~~ f ~+~~ i i hI ~1 ~,~ n k ~ k rl g x~ '7~.~1d~ ~+ r ;~ tii f~ ~ ~ r L I y-i ~'.' ~4 f 4t's~if '_,L ~ tkG «~l r~i s v a Y1 ~ '^' r7 C ~ ~.Idws~lt w 1 ......~^ +: ~ .a .._ ,vss w ~ rt Co 4 ~ i € std r~~ "n}'.~k n: ~r i C.h ,?.rf£'a~'4 Y 3~s"'x' - a,Ll a~ ¢'1~ 'Vr5 (Y F t .11.1 ~{r~. 'w-4.t 1' {.~.~ ~~f ~.' 'nt P~4 ^~. ~- qa a.~V\i i '~,•rtU^El~cl.. ti ,f T ..,rata ar ,~ k7.'~n ~~ ~w.v~>3,:c~s!xrxv?g+sd'~T~+~.~ ~.... .. _._.._v.t:,a. nara a~ . I ~ }~~ ~ ~ '~ ~ M1F ~~ ~ ' I ~ f 3 - ~i: LL _ ,~ r , jj ( ~r -4 ~ l~j !il h ~~' ~ A i :~ ~S ~ r 7 ~ t ~,«~ - } ~ ,r ~ J- Y ~ ~ fr J .P ~ ttt l ~ ~ ~ Sr ~ ,!'~ 1F I ~ ~ ~,. ~ ~ ~W ~ ~~ ~~ ~~-~~.6~- - - ~ 1 k - --- ~i yty t ~7j .~~~~' State of the art geogr"id reirtforced soil solutions for large wall applications. ,# r --~- - - ---- - - G ~( ,.~ rr ~ 1. F~.. ~ ~} li 1) ~ _ ~ ( "m.~~~!~p~~u~~ ~' Zvi ;: ~ ~B ~~ {~~.. rr `ls L ',Csd .. ~st~ '.e.,F r"wG, a'~u~,f -N~ 1^2t~_~;8 t~ T~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ II{ i ~ ~ ~'~i. ~ ~ ' ` ~, - ~~~, fi~~~'~ , _ ` ~~€ aa.. 4.~~,,~y,S'r t~* ~r ~c. y~i~, ,~ ~ `,~ j~T ~~Ay ~4., ~~ ,,r ~ ti ~7 ~ ~ (i',~y' y ,1 ? :I~i ~y ":4?~'~ +. E ~ - { ^f,~..-.+ ~ , r'rFs+ ~ {J~ \ A J. 45~~~"°~N} ,~ . ~~`'Y~L~, Tt" , u a '!~ y ~ ! q ~P y ?~ R I ~~ y err ~ ~ ~ 'n~" ~ ~~ ,ti F~+ # y~_ t r.+ :~J~.~ 't "~ ~•~' ~' .~i~;; j ~ f~i Yq. r~ Sy F~ ~} ~ '. ~ ,.~~~,~.. ...~ '~ .~~- `~GB~ ~:ti~i ~ .+~'a~ rat' ~ ~L~~~~ ~i~ ~ se ~;,. ~J~ t 2 ,'",~: s~ ~ ~~ji ,.~,e r .xL.. ,r•~ir~rs ~} t~F~3 ~'i t r1, J~~'T ~d~~j '^F. ~ ~1 l( 9 1 I i I fj ~.4 f I N lrw .+~ It 4S <i^3+meJ°`_ yyl'+! yw '. ~ - ~"^ i~ Y ~~~ .~ ) ~ 1 ~ 1 k .AY` ~ c F ~ I: ~ S ~~ ~ E' ~• ~" _` ~a"~n_ ~~. ~~ A~ ~~ AK 3""'f ~ _ _ 2 ~Y ~~; ' _~"' 4 , . fro., * ~9- _ - sro{ ~ Y ~'~' ~. !~ a~ ,~ ~ ~~~':' ~E 'x+4"4, ~ ~ 'k 'v, ' ~ ," ~ b ' ~. :~` ~f,, ~S~ya~~,~~.~~N~~+Nl~~~S~~~..~~3\~ 1 3 t` 1 ~ a ~ ''L ~t°,~ 6 1 'R ~ ~ ~`.~- ~ e ~ ~ i ~9 ~~f ~ ~i ~g ~ ~~~~ .tr~~$~ ~ r ~ ~t"yr r a -. ' 1 `~ ,i~' _ ~53~a~~•.-~'o.~ ~ 4 ~^rP~_ V 7'.' ~ ~ ~~ ~ r~F?F~ 3'~'f '~."'' r ~ _{~ j.. ~' 4-~ ~ ~ v.~ '~~"F~~ ti 'Ff^t e ~ a 4 -a"ffit ` " P ~ 7~'p ~ 15; at. ~ ~ " ~` ~ ~ ~ ~~~`~ .~ -~'x~-d,~~5&k~, ' o ~~ 9 ',~~,tLo `mac ` d~:*~` t;S '~ ~'` _ ._. ~ l~' - , i ~FF{ 2 a y~ ~ ~* ~~~„~~ ~ r2' 4 F, }, \ ~ - v ~ 1 -' i L~ ~~ ~~t CRY{ r.~ i~~ i av 'mY~ ~ I ~ e j ~ n ~ "~ ~ • l ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ _ _ f ,.: -_ ` .,~ -,+ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ +a '~"~ ~ sue. ~/ -0 ~ 1 ~ -T+~ r p , , , ~ a ~ -~ a r a' 9' ~ + ~ :! ~y ~t „, ~ " ~ i ~ ~. ~ °+n 4,"~ Y' i ~ : ~ ~ IJ Y16 Y q n ~ r ul r. ~ ,gyp +~ f k. ~: ~ .r J,akC! '.~ ` ;t~ ~i. ~~ ~ - 4"` ''~ ''~~ '~ F~y~~ 1..4.~q> ~ ~~F ~t~C "~~3~`F~ ~* ,~' ak~'L' F-r ~." ~~ ti :~~ _" ~~ '`_~,a+J. ly - z ~d P~v. y, ~L+~~ 1 llfto -~ ! ~'~' •...ti1 ~d;~,~~, f," ' ~u'. 21Y ~I" ~r ~a @ p „ a ~~~',~ s~~J L 1 y f~~,~.u .i .~a-~ ~`:~~, r ~ 3 jtz ! i ,. - "- f..~ t k.~, -.i,s ~!~^hk .D'' ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ }~~ ~/`-~~~.y+~;'x`~'" i'c~~i' ~ . ~i~ ~' ..~ „~4EK 7',.,~ f . '?°`',e~k~~a`AS_ ~.s i~ ~4 •+~, ~ 4 ~ t~ :`TR "d~ ~'~3 ~ ~. 'x ~'c.~ti ~~ w.,,r .~,~ rr ." ~ w b ,~ :w,~° ~I 5 i, ~ a k~~'C~ ~' y"~ ~ht. ~ w -.~ f y~.1~+,-"~ '~' .,< T "' > ¢ .1~ r ~,. ai ~t ~ ~ 4yvV~~~ ~~y g~ yq ~1 `o-'d., 'Y ~K3~'~ ¢ ~.h ~ .,«a'tu~Ch' '~ ~ ~ ~ ~'E;- "'dv~~~-~-~n~'~,~ ~ - 3 L5. f~S.. E p:.. ai~$ ~ r y . u :~. e ~ s ~r ,; ti ~. a' ~. ,^ A .ICY ~~:,... ~~ _ E~~; i. ~t~~ ~ f ~ i ~~ ' f ""_: i~ ~ ~ -2, e 1 p~ '~'' ~~,: ,,, ~ ? rs,.~ ~ b' C6 i ~~ ~ i- ~~e p~/ ~.em ^^'~~'u~ lei z+naam~s ~Y'd~'j7 ~,. . _ ~tti _ »:~.~..~_:~.»,.'W"x,~~ ~ ~' !` ~ pia I•••n anew: iyylup9~tr5. ~~. '. t'b ~~"~~~"~ •'iC' t~,u~ e~ :~1""~a. dam'' e v~ ~f ~1 ~~N - r."mtT-b~f.N ~~~a:d 1~t 1" ~1~tf i ~r3~ ~Sii11YLV /~1 ~~~~Ni 1 I ~~~~1 a 't ,~~ ~~t ~' '~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~} ~ Attachment: D ~~ a. y =fir d ,,.r •~ n 1 ~ ~ ~. /, ~. 1 '{ '~ ~ 7`. 1``(1`//1{(` •`T /A• J f ,. ~ ~n a~ ~, .a , _ ~ ~: ~, .[ yit ~, I 1: ~ ~ ~~ v ... ~ ~" r uu~ ,y,y T.v ~ =.r ;~ ~ Aar - 4 .Y ` ,n ~ ~E(JT]EC'HA~~ICA~L REPORT '~t ~~' c to ~ g ~•: "` r ~ r _ ~° ~ ~ ~ ~` ra:~'®R~ ~. rj. ~,, ~_ c:'Yana ' ,~ '' ~ _, ~ ~ rOREST R®AD SNO:WCAT,BxYPASS, VAIL M®UNTAIN ~~~:.~.:~ r•„ rt tp~~ .F.4 x t t.•.. ,. i ~ ~' ~ I~. _, ~ Sr~r~ > }~ ~ u ~ r' ~'S f r s .. '.~ T $,;.~ / t .: ~casr ~i i z .yv ~, ~ 3 '-i' f"" •a~ x _,N z• : : ' ~ ps5"~~' "` d ~. n en. i~tl ¢ L ~ v, a ~~ ~ A ~ ~ ~. - y -R t -~ a+-r; ^ i ~ ~ µ ~~ ~a, l ~ t r! r - 7 ~ LYc 7 ~.~ * ~ a a ~ a = ~ i-' s .~I[tln2lttcd~t0. ~ ~ `~ n i, hy.,~ J 1 q p ~q ~ •a J ~ ~, ~ .. ,n ~ ~ ~ ti T ,~Y.~. ~ ~~ '. s T~rziZRESOrts DevehPment Conipa~ry ~ ~ ~_ ~~ ~ _,.,~ ~ a - „1:3.7 PiCi1C~1)IlLlrk ROCid ~ C iy ~ ~ c 3 ~ _ _ w. ~ ~ P O: J3ox 959' ;, , '' hy{ '~ `'' :Avon,*Cnlor~ido;8.162.0-09.9 . L ~`~ ~ F "' {fr' sl - Y I ~> ~. 4'-~"~n r~ r ~ ~'... -~ ~ Submitted by { ''!~ ~ ~~<~"7L ~ (Y b k. a a ~. ~? ~ ~- ~4PGolder Associates Inc ~ ~ ~;; ~ ~, ~~~; ,~ , ~ a~• ~ ~ '> ~~ ~ `- ~~~ i 4 : _~ ~`' X54,4 Union Borttevard Suite 300 ~'Y'" ' ' ~ Lakewood,'-Colorado 80228 'y '`: y ~, ~'x~ ~~' f. 'a ~~.4, ~, '§ sry~ , t~. ~y Ate, d~ ,. ~ -~ ~,;,~;:. ,~,, _ ~ f 1 y ~aT^r. ~_ ~e~t 444 ' - { JJYY I/\ //~~ ~~ 1~. iiF ~, if\,LK~j1M'A1 ~~ .~ k V ~ k~~ ari .Y ~ v i. _. h r ~}q~ u ~ Distnbutton ~ ` = ~ ~ `F u ~6 Copies' 'Vail Resorts Development Company (~ bound, 1:unbound) y ~ ~ ~ },~ ,~ a 1 ~Cop~ Golder Associates Inc. k ~. '~ °` ~ ~"~' _ ~~ k ,~,~ ,~ ~, r ~~r - ~ ~ ~ - ~ Qt {r~ ~, • ~~ ~ ,~ 5 ~ ~~ ty u ~ December.l5, 2003 •~ _33 .,~,Y,~s ~ ~,y ~. ~~ li X125 ~ ~~ f ~~ Y ~ ~;„ 4 E ~- December 2003 -i- 033-2125 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 ]NTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROTECT BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................2 2.1 Background .........................................................................................................................2 2.2 Scope of Work ....................:.............................................:..................................................2 23 Information from Previous Studies .............:....:..................................................................2 3.0 SUBSURFACE GEOTECHI~IICAL INVESTIGATION .................................................3 3.1 Subsurface Drilling Program ........................ ................................................ ........... ............3 3.2 Laboratory Testing ..............................................................................................................3 4.0 ENGINEERII~IG GEOLOGY ............................................................................................5 4.1 Geologic Envirorunent .............................................................................................:..........5 4.2 Site Reconnaissance Observations ......................................................................................5 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL RECOivIlVIENDATIONS ..................................................................7 5.1 Earthwork and Grading .......................................................................................................7 5.2 Slope Stability Evaluation ...................................................................................................7 . 53 Retaining Walls ...................................................................................................................8 5.4 Bridge Foundations and Related Geotechnical Issues .......................................................1 l 5.5 Future Geotechnical Work .............................:..................................................................13 6.0 CLOSING .................................:.......................................................................................14 . 7.0 REFERENCES .........................:.......................................................................................15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Borehole Locations LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Borehole Logs Appendix B Laboratory Testing Results Appendix C Photographs Appendix D Slope Stability Analyses December 2003 -1- 033-2125 X.0 INTRODUCTION ~. This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation and engineering geology study for the forest road snowcat bypass for Vail Mountain, on behalf of Vail Resorts Development Company (VRDC). VRDC's current concept for the road is a cut and fill. construction with unpaved finished surface, with cut and fill retaining walls as needed. In addition, a bridge will be constructed to cross over Gore Creek. The purpose of the study is to provide preliminary recommendations regarding engineering geology and potential geologic hazard conditions of the property along with recommendations for bridge foundations, abutments, retaining wall design parameters, identification of potential wall types with a discussion of the applicability of each type, and recommendations for final roadway design. 1:\03\2 IZS\0400\040I10332125.0401.09350.DOC G o l d e r ,4ss o c i at e s December 2003 -2- 033-2125 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2.1 Background The site is located south of the town of Vail, to the west of Forest Road in Eagle County, Colorado. The snowcat road, to be used by ski slope maintenance equipment, trends south over Gore Creek, then turns to the southwest and gains elevation to interest an existing forest road at an elevation 140 feet above Gore Creek. The road will require construction of a bridge where it crosses over Gore Creek.. Retaining walls will also be used to construct the road and potentially parts of the bridge abutments. 2.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for .the study included preliminary field reconnaissance, asubsurface drilling investigation with installation of piezometers and inclinometers, laboratory testing, and a preliminary report of geotechnical conditions including a working stability model of the slope. The purpose of the report is to provide a preliminary evaluation of geologic and geotechnical conditions for planning of the site layout and bridge design information. 2.3 Information from Previous Studies Previous studies have been, completed for the snow cat road bridge site by Koechlein Consulting Engineers (see Section 7.0, References). This report. recommended the snow cat bridge be constructed using either spread footings or piles for the foundation, and that further investigation of the fill materials on the north side of Gore Creek be done. This previous study did not do any subsurface investigation south of Gore Creek or provide any recommendations other than those associated with bridge construction. December 2003 -3- 033-2125 3.0 SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 3.1 Subsurface Drilling Program The drilling program was conducted during the weeks of October 13 and October 20, 2003 by Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) and the drilling subcontractor, Spectrum Exploration .Incorporated. The drilling program consisted of drilling a total of five boreholes at the locations shown on Figure 1, and installing one piezometer and two inclinometers. The results of the drilling program and laboratory tests were used to determine the physical characteristics of the subsurface materials at the site. The boreholes were drilled using ODEX methods in the overburden soils to depths ranging,bettiveen 25 and 50 feet, followed by 2.5-in. ID HQ core drilling into bedrock. Standard penetration test (SPT) samples were collected/attempted in the overburden, but the rocky subsurface conditions limited testing and recovery. Contractors and others reviewing this work should note that this ODEX drilling method allows penetration of maerials that would frequently cause refusal to auger rigs. SPT blowcounts in the ODEX borings may also be influenced by the ODEX method. Contractors are _ urged to interpret data from these borings with caution. In general, the boreholes encountered gravelly colluvial soils or landslide deposits over sandstone, siltstone, and shale of the Minturn Formation. Thicknesses of colluvial soils and landslide deposits that may excavate as soils are expected to be quite variable. The colluvial deposits are characterized as compact to very dense silty sand and silty gravel, with cobbles and boulders. Landslide deposits have the same charater as the colluvium, or may exist essentially as relatively intact bedrock. The bedrock encountered below the colluvium in the boreholes was slightly to highly weathered, e.Ytremely weak to strong, tan to gray sandstone with some shale and limestone. Groundwater was encountered near Gore Creek during drilling of boreholes SCB1 and SCB2 at 15 and 22 feet respectively. Groundwater was not encountered in the boreholes drilled on the slope along the proposed road alignment. The borehole logs are presented in Appendix A, with the borehole locations shown on Figure 1. 3.2 Laboratory Testing Samples obtained from the field program were collected, tested, and analyzed for index properties (Atterberg limits and grain size distribution), and shear strength at Golder's laboratory in Denver, z: _ ~' I:\03121150400\0401\0332I25.0401.093SO.DOC Golder ASSOCIates December 2003 -4-. 033-2125 Colorado in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. Selected samples were classified according to ASTM D2487 based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The results of the laboratory testing are presented in Appendix B. Index testing was performed on samples of the colluvium overlying the bedrock. The insitu moisture content ranged from 2.6% to 6.1% on the borings in the slope, with moisture contents up to 14.3% closer to Gore Creek in the Bridge foundation investigation borings. The liquid limits ranged from 20 to 23 and the plastic index ranged from 5 to 11. The material was measured to have a pH from 7.7 to 7.9, a resistivity from 5165.3 to 7215.0 ohm-cm, and a soluble sulfate content from 0.001 % to 0.002%. A suite of direct shear tests was performed on samples of the colluvial silty gravel -silty sand material. The results of the direct shear testing indicated a shear strength angle of 38 degrees with low cohesion. December 2003 -5- 033-2125 .. 4.0 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY This section of the report describes observed engineering geologic conditions at the site that are pertinent to site planning and development. Approximate locations of some features observed are shown on Figure 1. 4.1 Geologic Environment In' conjunction with the field reconnaissance, we reviewed available published information for the area, including the U.S. Geological Survey's 2002 Geologic Map of the Vail West Quadrangle, Eagle County, Colorado (Scott, Lidke, Grunwald 2002). Most of the area is covered with overburden soils overlying Minturn Formation sedimentary bedrock that dips approximately north-northwest, in a similar direction and grade as the ground slope. The study area is characterized by dip slope topography, with the slope dipping about 20 to 30 degrees to the northwest. The USGS geologic map shows the slope covered with colluvium, below an area tivhich has been identified as a quaternary landslide feature. Most likely this large feature has not been active in a recent time frame. However, the slope within the area of interest also has geomorphic features indicative of landslide activity. Some conditions may exist or could develop which could result in localized stability concerns, either naturally or as a result of site modifications associated with development. The thickness of colluvial soil and landslide deposits overlying bedrock appears to be variable. In many cases, landslide deposits may exist as relatively intact, but displaced bedrock. 4.2 Site Reconnaissance Observations A field reconnaissance of the property was made on October 14, 2003. The following section presents the results of field reconnaissance. In a few locations, specific conditions were noted during the reconnaissance that could affect the proposed road alignment. These are summarized as follows: Immediately above the existing pump house, tivhich is at the approximate location of the proposed bridge, the slope was observed to be hummocky and showing evidence of several smaller lobes of localized slope movements. In addition, the I:\D3\2125\0400\040 1103 3 21 25.0401.09350.DOC Golder Associates December 2003 -6- 033-2125 aspen growth patterns suggest soil creep is also occurring between the existing pump house and the existing forest road.. • The existing slope, where the snowcat road will steeply climb between the proposed bridge and the existing forest road, was observed to have older large landslide features. The tie in with the existing forest road appears to be located on a bench formed by .the top of a slump block. There is another horizontal bench below this, where Borehole SCR-3 was drilled, which also appears to be the top of another slump block. These appear to be part of the enechelon failure block of the larger landslide feature mapped on the USGS maps. The exposed soils and drilling suggests these failures occurred within the colluvial soils. • The slope above the existing forest road is likely part of the older large slump block complex, and is covered with mature trees. Exposures on the slope show colluvial soils, possibly deposited through landslide movement judging by the material's random orientation. December 2003 -7- 033-2125 - 5.0 GEOTECHNICA.L RECOlYIMENDATIONS 5.1 Earthwork and Grading On-site soils are suitable for use as general fill,.although select granular fills may be needed for some construction. Some processing will be required to remove the ]arger material such that the soil can be placed and worked in lifts. The large cobbles and boulders, landslide deposits, and weathered bedrock in the on site soils may result in difficult excavation. Contractors reviewing this report to evaluate excavation difficulty should note that an ODEX drill rig was used, which will readily penetrate materials that usually cause refusal to an auger rig, or be difficult to to excavate with conventional earthmoving equipment. The SPT blowcounts may also not be indicative of excavation difficulty. Rock or difficult excavation may be encountered at any depth along the snowcat road alignment. We therefore recommend that the roadway construction.bid package contain at least an item for difficult or rock excavation. We are . available to assist Alpine.Engineering with quantity estimation of this item, and other aspects of the bid package. However, it should be noted that any attempt to estimate a quantity of difficult excavation is only a rough estimate, and variations from this estimate should be anticipated. We recommend 2H:1V or flatter for all .slopes. Surface water should be drained away from all structures. 5.2 Slope Stability Evaluation A preliminary global slope stability evaluation was performed for the snow cat road. Using the available topographic information and tentative grading plans provided by Alpine Engineering, Inca the existing slope geometry was modeled using the SLIDE (Rocscience 2000) software. Surveyed topographic information was not available for the complete slope, so some. of the topographic inforration generated by aerial survey was used to complement the data. Some engineering judgment was needed to develop an overall slope geometry using the two data sets. The evaluation of the existing slope was compared to an additional model which included the modifications required for construction of the snow cat road. The results of the two analyses show that constnlctinn modifications to the slope do not result in a decrease of the overall slope stability and may improve '' !:10 312 1 2 510 4 0 0\0401\0372IZ5.0401.09750DOC Golder Associates December 2003 -8- 033-2125 stability slightly. This comparison is of vital interest to the project, since the roadtivay and associated retaining walls are sited in landslide terrain. Vail Resorts and other consultants should understand that this evaluation of global stability is not in keeping with more conservative routine practice for roadway design, such as prescribed by AASHTO and others. AASHTO generally recommends a global stability safety factor of 1.25 to 1.5. Calculated global stability safety factors for this project, using the approach outlined above, are likely to be below 1.25 in some cases. We have employed this approach on other roadway projects with performance expectations higher than for this snow cat road, and so we believe that this approach is reasonable and viable. The stability analyses are presented in Appendix D. More detailed global stability analyses will be required with final design of the retaining walls. 5.3 Retaining Walls General Project retaining walls are likely to be either MSE walls for the fill side of the roadway, and soil nail I for the cut side. Either side likely will have a rock masonry veneer, similar to other recent Vail Resorts projects. Given the steeply sloping ground conditions, our general recommendation is that the road layout favor cut walls somewhat over fill walls, for two reasons: • Providing adequate reinforcement length for larger fill side MSE walls may drive the "heel" of the excavation so far into the hillside that the foundation of the cut side wall is undermined by the excavation for the fill side wall. We have discussed this issue with Alpine Engineering already, and they are aware of it. I • Adequately stabilized cuts generally perform better in this type of setting than the larger fill walls. Specific criteria for design of either type of wall are presented below. December 2003 -9- 033-2125 MSE Walls MSE walls appear to be feasible for the fill side retaining walls. Near surface soils encountered in the borings are variable in consistency, but often very rocky. With processing it appears that they could be used for MSE fill; they generally do not appear to be excessively plastic or to have high clay contents. The primary consideration will be excavation difficulty, and `processing as needed to remove oversized rocks from the MSE fills. - , An internal drain system, at approximately the back of.the lowest reinforcing layer (or the "heel" of ti the wall) should be provided. This drain should consist of at least a 4-inch slotted pipe embedded in clean gravel, fabric wrapped, and sloped to a suitable outfall. Wall design parameters are recommended as follows: • ~i , Ou-site Backfill- Friction Angle _ 34 degrees Cohesion p Unit Weight 125 pcf The following criteria, which are independent of backfill type, may also be utilized: I Minimum Reinforcement Length: 0.7 x Total Wall Height; Minimum Footing Depth: 18 inches; Factor of Safety for Sliding: 1.5; Factor of Safety for Overturning: 2.0; Factor of Safety for Bearing Capacity: consider as part of global stability analysis. Additional criteria such as required geosynthetic strength, interaction coefficients, and maximum vertical spacing of reinforcing layers will be determined during wall design. Wall elevations (profiles along the roadway) with reinforcement layout should be provided with the design, as well as specifications for the wall construction. ~y"z, ~~ i•~mt~ns~~enrnnen ~~naao nt nen~ novmnnr ~illl(~PP GCClIf•.IAtPC December 2003 -10- 033-2125 Soil Nail Walls The cut walls for the proposed snowcat road are likely to be most economical if constructed as soil nail walls. Soil. nail walls can be constructed from the top down as excavation proceeds and do not require additional .excavation for placement of wall reinforcement members. However, given the variable ground conditions of the landslide deposits encountered, attention to these ground conditions will be required on the part of the designer to minimize construction difficulties. Specifically, stand-up time for the excavations may not be very good, at least where boulders or gravels are present with few or no fines in the soil matrix. The design and specifications must provide guidance to contractors for bidding and constructing in such conditions. Slot berms or flash coating of the excavation face maybe required. Similarly, drill hole stability may be poor, and cased holes may be required. As was the case in the soil nail walls at Arrowhead in 2001, communication between drill holes and/or large grout takes are likely. The design should consider either grout socks or other methods to manage grout takes, and the specifications and contract documents should be developed with this possibility in mind, so that contractors can bid on and build the walls with reasonable risk and direction. The following soil nail design parameters are proposed for this project: `ParnrnF~ r•r ~ Va1uC' Friction Angle 32 de ees Cohesion 25 sf Unit Weis t 120 cf Unit Ultimate Bond Stress 12 psi The unit ultimate bond stress identified above is representative of dense sand and silty sandJsandy silt (FHWA 1998). A unit ultimate bond stress of 12 pounds per square inch (psi) results in an ultimate pullout resistance of greater than 2 kips per foot• for a drillhole diameter of 6 inches, as would likely ~~ be recommended as a minimum drillhole diameter for this project.. Soil Nail designs should incorporate permanent drainage to relieve hydrostatic pressures and provide an outlet for groundwater conditions or seepage that may develop seasonally. Other design measures 7 December 2003 -11- 033-2125 for permanent soil nail walls outlined in the Federal Highway Administration's "Manual for Design & Construction Monitoring of Soil Nail Walls" (FHWA 1998) should be followed in the design. 5.4 Bridge Foundations and Related Geotechnical Issues Foundations The conditions encountered in the boreholes suggest that several alternate foundation systems may be considered for siTUCtures on this site. Final selection of foundation type and design parameters will depend on a number of factors, including: Soil or rock conditions at the specific structure location; Elevations, geometry, and bridge hydraulics; and Performance expectations In discussions with the bridge designer, Mr. Bill Rose, a subconsultant to Brown and Caldwell, we have jointly weed that driven H-piles are appropriate for the north abutment, foundation, and a footing supported on an MSE wall is appropriate for the south abutment. H-Piles. North Abutment Steel H-piles, driven to substantial refusal in the underlying bedrock may be designed for full axial structural capacities (AASHTO recommends 9 ksi). Such a foundation would be highly scour resistant, and could likely be designed to provide good lateral restraint. A potential drawback to this foundation type is that boulders in the overburden soil types are likely to lead to early refusal, unless the pile locations are pre-augered. Pre-augering and drive shoes are recommended. Pile lengths of 25 to 35 feet (vertically) would likely be required (based on current ground surface elevation) to penetrate the bedrock surface and achieve full capactiy. Driving criteria and capacites should be confirmed by wave equation analysis. Wave equation analyses are also recommended to avoid overstressing piles in hard driving. x 1:\03\212S0a00\Oa0 1103 3 2 1 25.0401.09350.DOC Golder Associates ;- - December 2003 -12- 033-2125 Pile spacings of greater than 5 effective pile diameters are recommended to avoid group effects. If closer- spacings are necessary, we recommend a 75 percent capacity reduction for piles spaced at 3 to 5 diameters. In discussions with Mr. Rose, we agreed that a row of battered piles would be preferable to resist the lateral loads imposed on the abutment by the 8% bridge grade, rather than relying on lateral restraint from vertical piles. This is due to the soft, organic clay layer below the north abutment; it is possible that the likely low strength of this layer would affect the lateral restraint of the piles by the overlying soils. By using a combination of vertical and battered piles for this abutment, all pile loadings are axial. Footing, South Abutment Footings are a viable option for support of a simple span bridge, especially if they can be located to avoid scour issues. We also have experience in the design of MSE abutments to support bridge footings, and have discussed this approach to the south abutment with Mr. Rose. Tentatively, we agreed that this appears to be a viable and economical alternative to construction of this abutment. We recommend allowable bearing pressures for the bridge footin of no greater than 4 ksf,. bearing on the MSE fill. The near edge of the bridge footing should be at least one foot behind the back, or inside edge of the retaining wall face. For a one foot thick facing block, this puts the edge of the footing 2 feet from the front face of the wall. :Eor thicker wall faces, a somewhat greater offset would be indicated. We intend to coordinate this issue with Mr. Rose as-MSE wall systems are evaluated. Abutment retaining walls MSE walls as discussed above may be applicable for bridge abutment retaining walls. Some consideration will have to be given to the bottom elevation of the wall type, the resistance to scour, and the design flood predicted elevation. If the abutments are located at a location such that scour is not likely to be detrimental, a MSE wall system may provide the most economical abutment wall. If the abutments are to be placed at a location where there is a high risk of scour, a cantilevered deep foundation wall type may provide better performance. In discussions with Mr. Rose, it appears that an MSE abutment, in combination with retaining wall replacements along the existing bike path in this area, tivill be a viable and economic alternative. The 5 ~:... Vic:':. Vii:. ~';_S_ ~~~ December 2003 -13-__ 033-2125 portion of the MSE wall supporting the bridge footing must be designed to accommodate the significant surcharge loads applied by the footing. Elements of the this design will include higher strength, closer spaced, and longer earth reinforcing elements; as well as more stringent compaction criteria or select granular fill. Also, it should be recognized that differential settlement is likely, between the two abutments,. since one involves deep foundation on rock, and the other does not. Based on our experience, ,and analyses conducted on other projects, we expect that 1 to 2 inches of differential settlement are possible. We expect to provide afollow-up proposal to VRDC to add design of walls for the bike path and abutment in this location to our design scope of work for this project. Approach Fills The discussion presented in Section 5.1 is applicable to the approach fills for the proposed bridge. Special attention should be given to compaction of approach fills if the bridge does not also rest on fill, but uses a foundation type bearing on bedrock. If project performance criteria includes smooth transitions from apporoach fills to the bridge structure for vehicular traffic, compaction of the approach fill to 98 to 100% standard proctor maximum density to reduce settlement on the bridge approach could be considered. However, if use of this road is limited to snow cats and snow mobiles, this is not necessary, in our opinion, as these vehicles only use the road and bridge when there is substantive snow cover, which would most likely mask the affects of any minor differential settlement. 5.5 Future Geotechnical Work In accordance with Vail Resorts' direction, we are prepared to proceed with retaining wall design. We are available as needed to meet with other designers regarding this report and the project. Quality assurance testing of fill soils, pavement materials, and concrete will be required. Qualified . inspection of embankment construction, excavations, cuts, foundation installation, and retaining wall construction is also recommended. i~~nno n onenrnnen i ~mn i ZS M° ~ °9i S°.DOC Golder Associates December 2003 -14- 033-2125 6.0 CLOSING Golder appreciates the opportunity to work with VRDC and we trust that this report for the forest road snowcat bypass meets your current needs. Please feel free to contact the undersigned if you have any questions. ASSO~tA.TE",S IN,C. ~ 4~P ••...,,,~5;,. •, // Francis E. Harriso ~'; -~' Associate ` ~ ~ i` 2 77 .~ ° ,. _ . µ- ~ ~~- _ John A. Chapman, P Project Engineer 03/02/2004 15:50 3033219055 CANNON OFFICES Attachment. E Sue McCan Cannon ASS Sherman Sheet 8®68 pENVER. COLORADO 80303 TELEPHONE 303/3,21-7012 February 26, 2004 Town of Vail Desigzt Review Board 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colo. X1657 Dear Sir/Madam: My late husband azad I purchased the hozz~e oz~ 61.6 Fozest Road in 1968. At the time it was one of tktree houses on the road. Lionshead did not exist, and we loved the silence atad the serenity of the area. Theze have been a lot of changes to the area since then but the one constant is that my George and I understood how important skiing is to Vail. When Vail ,A,ssociates first wanted to use our road for. szzow operations, my husband met with other neighbors to allow the use rather than take the cozxapat~y azad Town to court. He was a man of great integrity and wanted to do what was best for the people in Vail. Since that time, West Fozest Road has, at times, become a l'attze:r division of snow cats. But, we never reg~•etted our stand on the issue. We knew that Vail needed the snow cats. As early residents of this great town we did our pant. Now, my understanding is that theze's ark enormous renaissance plat~xaed foz Lionshead, and coupled with the new shops, and buildings is a proposal to move the snow cat operation away from our zaei.gllborhood where very few if any people would see it - at no cost to the Town of Vail. I ask you to allow Vail Resorts to. proceed with this emdeavor, if nothing else, as a thaztlc you to those of us on West Forest Road who choose to live with the operatiozt foz the good of the communuity. Sincerely, Sue M. Canz~vz~ CC: Vail pepartment of Community Development Attention: Bill Gibson 111 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colo. X1657 Mr. Jac1C fIunn Vail Resorts, Inc. Post Office Box 7 Vail., Colo. X1657 Attachment: F THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on March 8, 2004, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6H-10: Landscaping and Site Development, and Section 12-6H-11: Parking and Loading Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive/Lot 7, Block 5, Vail Village 1St Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Ron Hughes, represented by Shepherd Resources, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, to allow for A residential addition, located at 2434 Chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block B, Vail das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Mark Yare, represented by VAg, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6H-9, site coverage, and Section 12-6H-10: Landscaping and Site Development Vail Town Code, to allow for A residential addition, located at 303 Gore Creek Drive/Lot,8, Block 5, Vail Village 1St Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Erickson Shirley, represented by K.H. Webb Architects P.C. Planner: Bill Gibson A request for final review of a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels, a more complete metes and bounds description is available at the Community Development Departement and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts Development, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Bill Gibson A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a text amendment to Section.12- 7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level and Section 12-71-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor and Street Level, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for temporary real estate sales offices on the first floor or street level of a building, in the Lionshead I & 2, Mixed Use zone district, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: George Ruther A request for final review of a variance from Section CC1,12-7B-15, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional site coverage, located at 230 Bridge Street/Lot B, Block 5-C, Vail Village 15c Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Rodney E. Slifer The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. This notice published in the Vail Daily on February 20, 2004. Vail 12esorts Sno~~~cat.4ccess Adjacent Property Ur~~ners List September 2003 TOWN OF VAIL , 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD ' VAIL, CO 81657 ADAM, NANCY SHAPIRO 4975 E PRESERVE GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80124 SMITH, JUSTII~TE H. 43 SOUTH SHORE CT HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29928 G. LOVEN LLC 934 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL CORP PO BOX 7 HAIL, CO 81658 WESTHAVEN REALTY LLC 1 ] 27 LAKE AVE GREENWICH, CT 06831 GLEN LYON OFFICE BUILDING C/O AI~TDREW D. NORRIS 1000 S FRONTAGE RD W STE 200 VAIL, CO 81.657 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE 24747 U. S. HIGI-1\~JAY 24 MINTURN, CO 81645 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING Monday, March 8, 2004 PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC NUELCOME 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT John Schofield Erickson Shirley Chas Bernhardt Rollie Kjesbo Doug Cahill George Lamb MEMBERS ABSENT Gary Hartman Site Visits 1. Slifer - 230 Bridge Street 2. Hughes - 303 Gore Creek Drive, #7 3. Shirley - 303 Gore Creek Drive, #8 4. Yare - 2434 Chamonix Lane 5. Vail Resorts Development Company -Tract K, Glen Lyon Driver: George Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm 5. A request for final review of a variance from Title 14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels, a more complete legal description is on file at the Community Development Department, setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson MOTION: Kjesbo SECOftID: Lamb VOTE: 6-0 APPROVED 1/1IITH CONDITIONS: 1. This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail design review approval of the associated design review application. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall enter into a lease, license, or easement agreement with the Town of Vail for the use of Town property. 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction staging plan for review and approval by the Town of Vail. 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall survey and then install all limits of disturbance fencing and all erosion control methods for review and approval by the Town of Vail. 5. The applicant shall properly maintain the limits of disturbance fencing and erosion control methods throughout the construction of this proposal. Any modification to the location or configuration of the limits of disturbance area shall require review and approval by the Town of Vail. Attachment: B -i- @ ~~~~ ~'a" ~_ ~ ~\ \.. _~ \`\\\~\ ~ \ \\\\ \ ~ \\ \ ~ (REFER TO GIVI~L PLAANS) `' ~-t ~. :• ~. ` „ l~n ~~ \~ ~ \ ''i\ ` IMIY• OA'~DI TURBAN E `_ .~} \ ~ \\ \ ___------_ r~T~ ~ r--~ ~\~~` F ~ ,. ~ ~\`~p\\"~ \ \ \'-,~ \\ x ~CF TO`GIJII_ N91 . °~",~\~~'~\\.i..~'1_ ~\ ~ _ _ _- ~ ~`~~'-~t~-_ r~ .ra~rw~ ' k ; sl s J _ ~\ '+.;. .+... a :~'S~ ~ `'"~ f~~~ y ~`~ - ~I: ~ a. ~~~ \• `- '~~.,~-ty~ x ~~ ~~.- ~ --, ~. _ !~ ?~~ ~~ayb-~,y,~,F s r~c`ri '~,,t .n T~~+#~~,~ '~~„~ -fi", t~;' ° ~8'~f ~ _ _ ig I '7- Q ~ ~~~~~~ rti. _ ~ -at_ '- -~.--x ~ii r _ - f~. ~ .. - ~.. . r.,~ '~"L^ Vie' "~ /7~ ,, ~~ • ~ YK`~~'~"%~ ~r ~~ rt< ~~~ t;>i r ~ •`r, J,~~,.t,~•..~i~'' 7ty '~Z* ?i/ r~i.- `~+: \ ~ ::~ ` -r =~'~'- ` '-~ ' p'' _ _~ ~ _ w. - - - ,~'-_ 0 ,.. ~1 y?~.. ~y.'J~~_ :r, z : a+~rx _y ss f~'4 ~1 ~,''i{+r,,6:,,r'VT~S:~v13.~T;S.~'~,L: - ~~ , -. ~_ i . _ - -- -- - f ^~- - -.~~~~.~^.+ \ _ ~i "`.•...._ ~~ i ,,},vp, ~.nui9 qT 7 ~'ti . ~~ d 4-va~.~ 'S r c a x1~'q cr. -. ~ _j _~ ~, wa ra ~ ... .( >~ ~ ~- ~... re - - ri . 'F 1.. - - ~ti 7i '`h~'- l ~ ~ ,1:s~_ ' -•,.~, , ~ ~.,,sS...F,i• .f.._a_,~a, 1 4:~X, T .y~ -* ~ -- ?r-.xwr_: tLa.'F <r - is !` .i. f<.:~. Or F+... .c^s T?+ . ~ . ., _..: Ss,-+ ~~z . ,. ( ;.;.I. ~ 1 i _.:a.F . •~~ - - __ __ ~ _p .,~~ I.~ .,Wxx. ~~~.1. ..ay~.L I-~ `~ ~ ~7': ~ t_ ~, err :~' _.._^~.,, ~..... e...~ ..,,_.~.,.. ,a. ' ~.-_ .. m-^R:•4.m. ~ { :,;,..,.y .c '~~ 4, }Sf ~"_ ~~ A _ _.,,~:W 7"l7.yc I ` ~' 'ay~'~I. ~ 3 . ; 'ti<" `~ _ _ 1 ; .,T nr1 a'1'fe~^n ... ~. ~. rc). a 17_ -_. ; H~~-__ .~.!s. 4.... ~' >;~ ;,. ~}a~ ,.~ -.. _ -~',.. _.:Y. 'S~'`++']-. 1-. i-a+b ~,a_.,rk. _ ?~_~, y-# _ ~ y,.a, t ~: ,.t. .'~i,'s a..kt'1::~~ .~, c. ~tii`vra.i?~?,,~ `~~"~ f~. .v arl i~v-.:-k _ ~ ~ ~~sun ~ rc>zta --s" ~.l' f I ~~. - -a-:?--i_. . ,'"~ c:i"~' .'f.. :, -,~- m r'c' .Fn4~r. ! . {'c A. .a,t•~~E.x. F. ;7 ,a~,4i - tt. _f~..,,•~r -,Lr~ _ ~. -._ ~. ;(.ter, r .r3!.y SI- ,~~. .,~.. -Q ` ~' :"g ~ - - ,.~. r t•i~`~.1., ;Sli'.. 6.r ..., _t 4. ~. (w' ~i„s?~o. .x..... F~ .a:~? 7E :`4.R`r.., . <.~' „~i'.'"i , .3?` p -s d i,1^: ot'. ,L. ~ .~._ ~O~ -- "Ci "`>~' n . ~ ~" .y ~i,.. ;rk:. fa^F•~~t' ,.,~. ~`~~',"' !< ~~. r ~~n .;~,:. . ~ 'An ;.ar i 5.A. E•a „a.,~;,,° - ' ` ., y ... ` - • ~'. L'J-. ;~Y,L ~ F # 'la/~R Y~ ~ "~.~:"1 ~ f„ ~ . r4 Cii'v~•' RSr _ .- i4 `t:•UlSr''i ,_+dl",a; . ~ -~ ;_ _ __ ^~ 'A _ _ -'~ ; f'1' 'm- - ."i L( 1 ' 4~ ., ,1ti ..~ m.. L ~`n~ ~r,.,Y ~..'~ °',rt . ~i^.a~a _ a ~~7"t N ti~F-, ~_~ ~-•`= ~?. ~_ ~~ ,.. J _ .~ ~ ~ ~ n.?~ '1.~~ ("E t / o _~- ~ 'l7~ ~. \ t i "r=.''~~.1 :?-,~ ~~~. ya I~~ - , l'. a;,'~Enl _ ~ . ~ ~~. _<.m~ °~ _~^a~ 'x. 1 i!I,.t a r.t_ .,I. - _ a-N ""' 1a3, ~- -L ~ „~. ~\ ~•e m ' ~" S~ ~ T r ti~ '~`~. tn. ti' ' fw -- ~- 3tT'~ \~; ~_ mot, .>i ~\ ~~°'~~ .. 14~.,,_ ,. =_,n_v _ \ / '~a~;~r~f ~~'y'~\~"7 -__Ez: -~---A-._r~~.~~~:.~n`\; ~ a7- - ttx -- __ -.- r.i ~ \~~1`e~.a ~~~ ,•U ~ F~l•.,l_~`°-_ ~ - °~y~H*~~5.' ''~-<~_._. ~_'' \ ~ i\ ~\ -_'` \, ~~..~' ~`\ ~ ~., ~_ ~ `(~~~I-~- jet,' _ - -.:29 :m`~;ya{ Y--:J~ t LIT OFOISNF9 IJGE \' ~`\~_'~ \=-M>-4_` __ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. `__ -__ _ -' ~ ~ ~ V . \ (REFER T L YGANS/ • ~~ ~`_ l ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ . +''i ~ -- _ _ .-~_ ,c~\ ._ \~.` ~` ~ ~ LIMIT OF'DISiVROANGE-~. ` ~~\~•~~ `~~i-. '_~_ ~'~-````~~\ y/~_~-_- ~\. n. ~`'• -_~~~~_\ "`. ~ ~>Y'' (REFER TO GIVfL'FL~1=~`\ya~~~~ ~_= REfER~09NA~^?'IAKLY~ ^ij ~"~~ i+~ ~~~ __. ~\~~i~~~\\~_ ~`\ ~\` ~'~~~~~ ~\ ~ ` \\ = -~~__-V SKI HALM FFLARTIN69` I•~ ~_ 7~/` ~ ~ _ ~ ~ `, Etlrtry oa.ban O hoFvaea .Upm ...~_ •.~ '~~~ •.~ •~`~-r_`_--~-"`\ ~ !:,- o 'u"cd BaO RESEGD ALL D131VRBED ARPA9 ~i. \` ~ ~~i; ;,~`-,. `+\ =~.,:.~ E.I.Jng F.ngoan a fUTN NATIVE BRASS SEED AND T cal BaB ~~~~- -` -\, r '~.. - ~~%I\,\~ INSTALL AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ~ i'v') A''aa.R. ~ /~ REFER TO SPEGIFIGAT10N9 ~~~. 3 1 hcpoape Deagba Fi ~ hapoaea Loegpob ran --- ,\ ~i~ _/-~ ~ ;N } fepoaea,pee ~ hopa,ea se.+E:etnry ~ ti&' _.__ .---_- -- __ i~ -- ----- - ',Q C.LE; I Z,i. ti .. ..... . < :. :.. PLAi~T LIST G E N E (~ ~ L F~l U T E 5 PL~NTI~-1G ~IOTE ~ aTM. B~tAfuCAL ~ GCt9btl IIAFE , , ~ „=E,s bI.E IMIt ~~ I. Horleontgl Ond vertlc0l Mee Inlormgtlen provldad Uy AlPine Ei~~Ineormg. Gonbactor shoo verily existing condlLlonaprlOr w flmi Inswllotfon. 1. Location O! all lreea shall be staked by Lhe GantrxLOr and approved by the Ladacpe Mehltact "s °^^~°"°I°L°m°"° 'r'.t<°#ww s'u ere 2. s e ',Cant of .aelnqq aar_YYOrmd unlit le b not known. Gontroclor e R 7. Plat names ore gbbrevlgled on the d-onings. Ses plant Ils[ br key ad clcsslllcatla. ~ O1 rac+r. utw. m,uefnpek snore ~ hgll lla ld-vcr dLlq! tlUtlmS d condILIOM. Ond nOtlOy y . I>CI cc]] g th L d d -. Verily locdtlons c/ all pertinent exlst4rg site MpravemenU one vtllltles gbeody Installed prbr ~ m rn,. fcb,b tovom R+t~y.fw ~ an e >cappa ArchitacT f y o lxreapacles bebra slgrUng k, prior to hstana king medlFlcdtlen> os directed L-y opo Architect Contracts HOn. commencing plaung work. IF any part of this plan cannot be lollowed due to site candibons, o cw..ta l~s.ro ~ o-a.y.p~. Kere . III be required to comppleta the work of Chis pre oc[ gccsding to tha r osed drgwk, d t li d f atoct the Lad>copo .4chlleet la Irotrvcliona prior to commend k. - ^9 war n r. "'6'r`r3°w,ruH ., eegm • n are pp p gs, e o > >pecl lcbtlana. I< Ilicla be h tho ~ Ilala <onlagt Landsco hlt 4 t F l F G 4.' plOnt gvatltlea s mk>olleoll ehown on ion take receden itt t a l , p e ec or resa u lon. cnboctor -hall take .dspon>Ibllity for ay co>ta Inelrrred due LO damage al said ulllitles. ~ y y p p ce over wr en ha rvcLlans. ... Align and ogvglly apace h all dlrectlon> shr•+ba and peremlole per these rotas ad rYawin s nw>o ..p nmrf~ a r n, Po'9> snore 3. the>e drawing do not p OF solely mq[erldls o qulpment, methods or se vanc In Oa r t d ~ l a g . 6. It b the Contrwlor: roeponSbllity to Ivnbh plant material Irae of pests or pia[ dlfogaef. . . ~"„rra,r ee nren.,p r4mse ~ n,syyo. n arga. room Irraem g 6 p eO o ar ns ~d propert? e fign af tha ranagewra le ra>p ~ lieqq r elreet and Im I m ! . f e a Pre-selected or •toagee' material mvs[ be In>paetad ty the Gentrocter ad cerq/lad e>t of o perq an e o qq qn> nd procedures w protace the Jwner Latl>ca a Architect iSvbcontrgctor> p d dl f I h ' ~p.,,~ ,,, y,,, , p , , the pv'ollc and othan. ~ an aeaao ree. t la t e Contractor s obllgatlan t0 rvarraty all plant materials par the >paclflcetlana. s rku nq.r crow •;„r. ru Lre 4. II conlllctf xlse be[wpen tlxe OI seas and plan, Contracts If w ~ B ft.°nyr. rtrde yr.. vn re e entaet Lad>eepe Architect fcr rasalvticn. Fallwe to make > h confllctf ~ One thYd (33%) of the Aspen trees. shall bo multiytem, rerer !o specs. n .°r known to the Landscape .4<hltact will re soft In Contrac[s'f liability l L t ~ .y.f red.++ePr•. Rr. ere o re oca e the rngterlolf. ~ u r,Pyr'..•-lourr +...r mom 5. Do no! tI1FW lyy proceed with ccnatrucllon as daslgned when It la ~obviova v - •apw• f.wbtlw ~ rpe a r.r ere :hot vnkr wn Cbstrvc tlan> and/ar 9r de dllf erencee e.xlst that may not h . nq~e roan known daring design. cordltlons hole re Immodlgteny t ht h ~ 5Nlae'. ra~gq . t e otlenticn of the Landscao Architect. The Contractor >hon > ~rSe full relponserlllt tar on no ce>>Ory revl>lone due t r ll l t ~ ~ M.wew,t,b ~ evy•at,r,.rr ` opt s'.. y o o vrf ve o g wdi nouncquga ~ s,„,,,e„s ~r ~A.M~ s~>a b. GonVgetor shall be reap alble ror ay rdlnoLlan wleh svbcontrgc Lora C[ ¢G [ E F~ n L El or other GenerPl GOntr O ora of regvir n gcaompllsh Gan>trecllOn Operation>, y ~ t~ ~. B. Rarer eo o-rlgaela o-gwlr,ge for ragored rngadon Neeving. ~ The location Of /oatvrds to be t t d t / dr `,~ ,~°rO''. Fropmee Wdyapola Ptw ~~A~Z s Frooesed Cw lm FY ~- O cons rve o no > a I lcoll^y dimensioned may bo gatermined by scale. If conflicts Orise~ln'llo ld co toe! the y ,r Eshtsg D>ckfovt Prcpesad M e a, ~~~1~/ ;j;` p s 7 fny ~ / . , Londecoee Architect fx reaolutlan. { typ ASFEN y[ING e.. Refer !e CiNI Orawings fa gddllional hlsmotlon. `~., I~:' • 7 s'cal ErB ated ` rh O Fo C ` ~~ 10 Cimenalgn> ad ccnf i r Cl t t , . p erry _a a ~ T Proposed Ew•rce ~~ E.isetg Evcrgsen - . a gu ans cans rvctlon / e Isting c ndltla> to -d on the rest liable InFCrmat!on. ii+e C-antractcr >hgll ~ erlft~ all e.xl>ting OnGitians OrlOr to OrOerrn loalageln the I- M N \ • !• cal B!B ~ ~ ~.~ Apposed >btWe Rw.e ~r ' g. g. o rn.e err g c ad. or complauon'ar >hcp d-o.nng r now. c oa s. ll. Finished gqrrodca shall provldo tar nn[vral rvnolF 1 water nl[hgvt lorv spots kC[>. rot flaw tIr1E> ccrn'owl~1 dp cVidO 'nMtxn "and mnxlmvm 'O`.to ~rgdlenL •mlas> a:Mrrrlse r.OteS Posl:lve cYOhhrr~~gqa shnlToccvr gnoy from tullding3 cod improve cots. >bllFU the Landscape 4r.:(Itect or ~ ~ ~ oV oiscrepaclBf belarematarting wcYk. 12. Hold IInISMd grades jtoo aF rwlchl icr fhrcbs and grcvndcover areas I' l~ ..claw tap Ot d~acent pavements, cvrCa. handers wlesa ctherwlsa noted an Lhe drawk.ga -- u~r. u- IB. C-rgdvally r vnd ff loos and teas 1 Cpes to paoduce smooth and natural ~~~ /'-ta+sa °O ~r se~Nr:"sO+o cppegriry trohsiGcn tetween relotlvely levels sand iiopa>. `' ~~,.,~.~a ca la. Revgh grade (hall be re~lewsd ad gcccpted b'y the elvu Engineer ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~• ~ eu..».rro s..kna .>,, t.ecs prior to soil prepsatlcn ooeratlcns.~tr~~~/ J / i5. Rar r t0 the ro^cet 4avgl is tee/nlcgl speclf lca[lans, detail>, r,d ~ Y "i /~ 1 canelugns gcrcr Ica ml> work. E `~=/C_J - t„sa q. tt xo Ib. AI angles se 9J dec c vnlafs n-led otherwise. ~ j ~~~ y+1„~i~s w+rerr nma Il. Finl>hod gradef Indvde 4'epr tap>OII In tun. ~ [~^,~1~` ,~ x219 S'~3~''t(9t~`'~'~r--4iT'~-n."..,.. ~,. s.ecs. _ _ r~~11-1f"~L fa..r.,ee akvae _rr - _~i ., • ,~ L I ~ EVERGREEN TREE ~! ANTING CfFTAIL ( ? \ DEC L`2, NT5 ` L-? ,NT5 ~~,aa,r.xta.ea_.~, I~ ~ nr_..r...c.rn~.eeuw VIII T ~-~ ore .ate see..as I~ 3 ~'~n~.,~y~t: _ wZ 'i:: f-.ri.. -r ,..n~,a..t..a.r. k- ~,~ n~a,~t .~ 3 ' Sh:hUB PLANTING DETAIL f L~i NT5 TEItNA~/ ~~", U°;.».., m UJ JQI >Q -~1 > J~j ~ I L~ I -,~ (n ~~~ ~. Q W ~~~ O 1 W ()~ ~ ~ 7 (~ Q ~ J ''101 LL al ~'. aisQ g ~ ~ -- -- II SHEET I_-? ~Y" c. ~ `l P~ WW \ ';; ~ ~: 1 `'~ `~ I ~, ,~, 1. _a_, , _~ ,~ , ~ _ a , ~ ~ ,, ~tl _ ~~,~ ~ ~ ~ I y O ) ~aa \• b S'~ ``~,`~~ ~\ l a'nW ~ ~~1Y$I~a \ . _' ""_ .. ~~ ` ,. t ~I U ~y tia1F I ~~. \~`l, \,`~ . \`\~~ ~ \ \ `, 1 C~ ~ it `1\.. '"~ \ +~~ `,l ` c,~T_' , ._r..,:~`l.. L - l b 1 , _ f \ 1 .a- a li ~ h r ~.~1 Ij~+ 1\~ \\,\ ~ ~,\ ~ \ ` ` ~ 1 ~/ /~ S;\~4~M' xe` +l ` a M \l 4+i~ - ~~- ` ~ ~• ~~1 O- •~~ `• 1 §~ iG\~. ~1t`~~ \\\\ \ ~ ' ~1 / ~\~\ ` +` oa ~ `;~ ~.tC •~1.-- R ~. +,111 I' 1 ~~,*1 l ,l, ~`\` / / '1 ~l\\\:: }8 ~l ;¢'i ,.v dr~°' ; ~l: `' ~ ~ I :I { ~ a1 l \ ,` \ \` \\ `~{ 11 1` 1. / ~ `. ;\ '~\1a ,.; rn \ ~ \\ t \ ~. s .: ~. ~ __ " ~ J`~"` • 1~1 a~ ~ I i .i;=; 1;~, \ ~ ae cis ~q 1 ~1,i\`~ / I 1 =ref •~1 + , ~ ~Y-'- ~ 1 ; ~ ` • 'AREA ~t~.4 I ~ `~ \\ \\. \ ` >srlr ' ~•--'--- ' •' ~+` i ' li' [ t se'!il r4' ~ \`,` I (`_ ~~ e.~; /I ~ \u ~ ~~~a • l \\~,~ ~-~ i~r ~ 1y"e~} IIII 1 ~l`~ F ;; . 1+t1~~` ~' l1 l ,\ 1REt`ER'TG 1 ~~ 1•.; l ~ i ~ ~I• i ~-. ~i i•. - I A f t Ckt`Z 1 1 •l 1, ~ 1 `-l•i ~ Il 1` 1 'gN6wc `rtea~Aas P~inNS ROR I ~ • I ~ l s ~ / n • _ ~ I ,~ t. ~i ~~v`~~h~4~iy ~~t g. ,Q 4 .S _ i\ ,a''`1~ 11 ~ ~ \ .j J ~ , ~ . y-F''p`; ~ 1 I a T ~~ \ p ;Y \ ADD TIONAL PLANTINGS 1 ~ 1' 1 .~ `\ • ~ '1 C` \\ .e' i ~}+~~--`~~~ L:~+ Y~;~.Lr~ t4 kr ~i~e !'l+~(n.~+CT,.c \\. \\ .\ \ \~ `\ \,l I ! 1 ''` ..~~ 1. ~,~--~''.+ t•-----` ---- _=-,. "- -~-~ \~i ~v" ~,~~1 ~.t'9e.T,t~< ,,~ ry'f~lt~.)~ ~ '.' ,\; \+`i \ l 1 ~ ~. `~ h ~ r (1`~ %Ci ~'~~ _' -~ ~i >\\\~3ti\\\l\~ ~ p3' ~J ~`i}.~s ~~~'' \l ,,\,; \'1• z I 'lip:: 3ai~~ S~~a:. a ~ 1 TE .ku~~. I 1 jU 1 J a. Q ~ ,, a. ~ ti ~ z~ QW ~_ 3 ~, 0~1 U J PLC\NT L15T LEGEND a: SEEDING NOTES y. eotan!calW~me GammonNarne Nates ~y 'TREES S,L~~-ft Praposed °pru,:e (Ht h Ft.) ~ OI Plcaa purr.Jens Golcrodo -pruce IE' ht. 61g I. NEiCiD i5'rYaFS BA>S O Proposed Aspen (~ calf ~ 0' 14' ht. g7 B rvm wewe!AY ~:+LC O Proposed .teen (2.5' cal.) OI I~' ht. BJ B ~ -. rc3rto uL arrta c!snRBEo O ' Proposad .tpen (: colt OI ~ ~ 01 10' ht. g16 Bt.3 6' ht ~sEAS rum turlvE EEEO wx O Prcposed Alder OS Papuh,s t.amulbldes .Loan . 3' cal E.B s..E^Lr NrnvE EEEO ~x.u r,E rNre of ~ as w.;lA:.eE.~sFECIE~,+nceu ,I _- ` a ~ O7 .^.3' cal B35 1 ~. !- Prcpcsed Redtwly Dogwood ,.dal.) ~ O: 2" cal 6J g ~. `_EEDWG iN~! L EE !,EFLIED BT NrC•ONALHIN6 2 L'~ Proposed Pctentllla (3 dal 1 06 Alms !eroialia rninleaf Alder 6' Flt. BEB ~ Pb;.+IL ERGE~ON cCN1`neL EL. NKEt GV ~LL >EEOED AFE15. L7 Proposed Becb's tVillow r yalJ SHRU65 IS Garrue 3afl•:aa RcgtwitJ Dogwood CJOI. ~ s. r¢rER ro Eeeslot cahmal ..^_>!+ YGRE RF^RM.1U^Iy~.O kESJIAREYF.!r=, ,ZCpt ~~ `y- I - O Proposed Coyote Wil!ew (5 r~al.l ~ O7 Potentllla Fruitocosq Putentllla 5 dal. ~ ~ 8 0 ~~ t,,,r Prooosed Rocky `1tn. %Villgw i5 ?ql,l vS 4711% Irbt%lana E't717'B N1111o'n g 9a1' 5. `_ETJNB :zELrt:G :NULL CCJ.R EEIEEN A[Rlt 15 S~ • °C:.L°~ i' .:~' ~ .~ © Fro ed Gh k h N OIj :oli~c exyuia Gcyote %illlcw i gal. •L~ a. r.vx sR.•.oas w,;u cccuz EE*rCEN ti o '° -_'^'^' aos o ec arry, atve f5 yaU OT bllt mcrcrtlcofa Rocly Ntn. Wllew 5 gal. _ x~br ` ~o ar ~a e. p/ rEE O~ Prurws vir~ln!wna Ghatecilerry, Native 5 9a1. ~~ -I x ..: 1 ..: ... .. .:...:..: ._..~ .. ....' . .~.. __ ~ w .r.¢i' ~r~~r .. 'ii`i.. _ ... .... ... .. ... . . _.- ... . ~ .... ... ..." ___. _.. .. ....... .. . .. ..._ .. .. o 1( TERRA p I ^ /'~ G L.o L`~~NEI~.r~L N`/TES ~ ~ ~,r n,.ru ~ ..rid.., I. Horizontal and crGlcal base informaGlon ovlded AI e~ En Ineerin ~ ~ ~ "If•1~~~OJr(~`P~1 {J^u~~~ I Contractor shall verify o.x bung candl[lons prior to ilnal Instolipt on. ... the tent of existing under ound utilities b not knorvn. Gentractar ~ rxee ea..ce srn..r, c•xi-in ~ ~-~rz~nD y,~ro~,°xry'y r°.~- shall Fle ld-verlf4 e.xlstlnq gr~,jas, utllitls and condltlcns; and notify / HruDiucerroH Heave w eu• f : srwwos or a ew s.w. sren ' [he Landscape .+.rchi[ac of any dlscrepanUes before sterling work, prlcr to inatallpllon. ~ ~ eaass saormsr • euH exo race. a.,:H rc rrctox smJ.r making modlricatlons as directSd by Landscape Architect. Contractor a .-our co+ert ren erxs ~ r~?'~E rtn srecs well be reduired !o complete the erk of this pro Iec! pccerdl 6g to the ! ~ s Ha .xc.aa suFiH• ree srtcs. - propoaed drawings, details and zpeclFicotlcns. IF confllcb arl_e In the ~ ~ «mra +im suxiw re.a erec• eld, contact Landscape Architect For resolution. Gcntractor shall Coke responaibllily for any cozts Incurred dva to damn a of said vtllltloa. -" ' ~ mee arse. ro.aer mee sr•xe sD 9. These drawings do not specify safe ^y materials o egWpment, methods ~ ~'~~ 's~ s•urea wticH, xe vets ~~r ~^~N~. o+~n*enon J r seovencing to protect eer sons a d property. It shall be [he ~I \ .% s. raicla mHe ~ met nw r_a vets ~ O (I contractor's sole responslblllty to direct and Implement safetyy operotlons cif-. / ze s r sa-•s / Q and procedural to protect the Owner, Landscape Architect, SWcantrpctgrs, - _ ~ I /-rum'ucH. xe s.ecs. the pobllc and others. ~ ~ • ~ s ~~ ~~ i~.. -1 -u.Hrwxrsnsrecs ~ J J'- 4. If conflicts arise betwc en size of areas and plpns, Contractor Is to i ;t /' ~ ~,~ contact Landscape Architect for resolution. FaPura to make such confhcl5 ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~, r, •• ~ > L known to the Landscape Architact rvlll resin! In Gcntractorb liability III= II=1111 'II- II wr+r.cmD exrxrn_y II - I -~ nwr w+rea erecs. tg relocotc the materials. L D( ~Ie L-I ~ ~-.{L - JTI_uIJ-fi= a -_ID- _ ~~? J~TI- ~ 5. Co nct rvillFuily proceed with cenetructbn as designed when IC I5 obvious - Rom. n»r+u cae.w r neoJe _ T rsD s.cwra~ on ~ that unknown obs[ructlons and/or prpde differ enc ea exist [hat mp at ~ " t~ ^'D III-=~~1~1-IT1r=TI'fl~=il .,.c - I y " >G. ES Waaan~plHa riHisH aMDe ~-L LJ~I-I I1= WDiST,rtEGD SOiL ~q _ have been known dur frig design, lvch condltlcns -hell be Imnedbtel9 ~~ JI - IL-IIL- I ~ V brought to the atlenGlon of the Landscape Architect The Gen[ractcr shall ~ assume Full resporoiblhty for all noccssary revisions due !o failure to Ive ax *coro.tc wD ~ Z ~ < ouch notlncptlon. g LT EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL ~ ~~ _ Y W ~ L_2 DEGICNJOU5 TREE PLANTING DETAIL 6. Gcnlrpctor shall be respons!ble for any coordlnotlon with subcanlrac fors NTS `_ Q (I Or Other 6e^efgl GdntraDtar$ as recyvrod Co accomplish construction OPBrptlana. `^, L s NIS ~ 1~ Ul F 1. Refer to Irrigation drawings for rectvlrcd Irrigation Sle suing. `C 8. the localian of Foptures to bo cgnstrt•cted not SpaUFlcally dimen9ened wax -e ~ O V L may ba determined b stole. If conflicts arise in Iced, contact the o'vui,.rie~~ * e srtcs - LandscapeArchRectforresolution. ~ uw' 'Ht s's'"='=•- ~ J u+o n.. i¢aDVe .r eiro ~ ~ ft~~~ 1f,\ I Il` . ~. Refer !o ArchlGCCNraI drawings Far LaycuG and Dimerolons. H.~Hrn~.HCe v.n,aD 1 L. ~`.NTI I •v I VOTE../ a.exr~~~ wr mrH r~,~H r- 10. DIm E^slOna and DO^FI Hans OF conslruC lion of BxlStin COndlGlOns art a]iL r9x eEe srlLa bpsed gn fne best available In FOrmpclGn, a Ggntrpclor hall verlP.I ail o.dstlrig •e.KC " 5~ C I. Location of all trees shall be staked bj the Contractor and pppraved by the Landscpa Archltac! conditions prior :o ordering, Fobrlcoting,, atherwisa incurring cash, ortdior ~. completion of shop droving review, ~ ~i lax' D°° ~ ?. ExocC placement and shops of planting, beds zhall be rovlewed by the Landscape Architact ' prier !o Ins toilatlon of Irrlgp Clon spray neadz. Stx/os in their pots shall L,a pieced for review II, Finished Grades shall prp~lda for npturpl runoff of water without low spots ~ __ or Goakeiz. SBt Fiew lines accurola ly and Cprovlde a minlrnvm a4o and maximum III ~ ~• I _~ 3. Plant names Gra obbreviolad an the drawings. See slant IISt for key and Uasslficatlon. 505 aClent unhs s5 atharw se noted. Pos'!IVe dramaaaa shall xcur away From t ~?un ,~. bulldirigs and Imprevernants -Notify the Landscape Architect aF nny - I I ,~. ~ M.,q~~ •~'~~~}''~^ III ~ 3. Refer to Pra)ect Manuel for technical sectlona, delalis, and condltcns ga'Jarning this .work.. dlscrepancles bofcre starting work. III ~,y~ ,'~4,.i~{r'!.•{ ' _II. r ,. SaK'..r _, yz~~` - VIII 5. VarlFy lac aliens of all pertinent existing site improvamenb and utilities already installed p for I=. Hold Finished grades (top of nwlch! Por sh ubs and grevndcover areas I' ~ to ccmmencingplanting wer k. If any Dart of this plan canna! be followed due co seta conditions, ' below top of adjacent oovements, tyros, heade,^s unless otherwise noted III-I II_u i i_~~ ~ ~~I I - contact the Londscaoe..Architect fcr instructions prior to commBncin,y work. 1 en the drowingz ~~}.} _ _ ~ ~, ce.a•nc-ee s.crriu Da ~ III-III-III-I U-I (I 6. Plant ~uontitles symbolically shorvn on olpn take recedence over written instructions. u _ y p pe produce a smooth and npturai ~ ~-I 11=1 I I-~ (~- I I e C 13. Grodvall round oFF to send ties of sla a to uro'aiD°9e'd'"v _ __ 1. Align and ogvolly apace in all d;rectlans shrubs and percnnlals per these notes and drawings. f5~3 GppLgfhlg tran51G10^ batrveen relgtlvely level press Gnd slopes. I I =III=III=III-1 i I~ 14. Rough grcde shall be reviewed end acccptcd by the GIYII Engineer 8. Trees, not In shrub beds shall Nava o mulched watering ring. Sae pipn[Ing details, ' - - prior Go sell preparotlon cperoticnz. sx .oom.u wvrH - ' 9. I[ is the Gentractor's respponslblGty to Furnish plant moteriGl free of pests pr plant dlscpsez. ~ e I p ~ SIiP.UB PLANTING DETAIL Pro-selected or 'ta~ged' material muat'be Inspected by the Gantroctor end certlfmd pest 15. RoFer to the Pro ect Ma Wal for technical s eciflcptloro, details, and ~ and disease free. I, 7 the Contractor's obliga[icn to warranty all plant. ma[erlaly per Che y I ~ ^I conditlans governing ChL ark. ~I-"2 NTS specilicptians. IE. All angles arc PO degrees unless noted otherwise. `~~ - fl v~ ° v i 5F1[~i I -'7 D rt C1 C'1 S lD rt. v ~~ THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY ~'~ PUBLIC NOTICE ~~ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-3, Vail Town Code, on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 at 6:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: ITEM/TOPIC: An appeal of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission approval of a request for a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located. at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels, a more complete metes and bounds description is available at the Community Development Department and setting forth details in regard thereto. Appellant: Vail Resorts Development, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Bill Gibson The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Community Development Department Published March 19, 2004, in the Vail Daily. Attachment: E Vail Resorts Sno~~~cat Access Adjacent Property U~~,mers List September 2UU3 TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD ' VAIL, CO 81657 ADAM, NANCY SHAPIRO 4975 E.PRESERVE GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80124 SMITH, JUSTINE H. 43 SOUTH SHORE CT HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29928 7 G. LOVEN LLC 934 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL CORP PO BOX 7 VAIL, CO 81658 WESTHAVEN REALTl' LLC ] 127 LAKE AVE GREENWICH, CT 06831 GLEN LYON OFFICE BUILDING C/O ANDREW D. NORRIS ] 000 S FRONTAGE RD W STE 200 VAIL, CO 81657 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVl.CE 24747 U. S. J~IGI-i WAY 24 MINTURN, CO 8 ] G45 WNOF Y MEMORANDUM Town Clerk TO: Town Council members FROM: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk RE: Letters of Interest for the Vacancies on the Design Review Board (DRB) and Art in Public Places (AIPP) DATE: April 1, 2004 The following is a list of interested community members that will be interviewed for the Design Review Board vacancy at the April 6, 2004 work session. The letters of interest and resumes are attached for your review. ~-esi~aa review Boa~cl (lvacancy to be filled, to complete the term left by David Viele's appointment to PEC at the last Town Council meeting, the team ends 3/31/05) Sherry Dorward Diana Mathias In addition to interviewing the two applicants for the vacancy on the DRB, staff is requesting the Town Council appoint a new member to the AIPP board due to the resignation of and vacancy left by Robert Matsuda, effective April 1, 2004. The Town Council interviewed the two applicants listed below at the March 16, 2004 work session and staff believes interviewing them again is unnecessary. A~ in Public Places B®a~al (1 vacancy to be filled, to complete the term left by Robert Matsuda's resignation, the term ends 3/31/05) Millie Aldrich Dan Telleen Staff requests the Town Council appoint one member to each board for the remainder of each term ending March 31, 2005 at the Apri16, 2004 evening meeting of the Town Council. 75 South Frontage Road .Vail, Colorado 81657.970-479-2136/ FAX 970-479 2320 . www. vailgov. com ~~ RECYCLED PAPER e~ .~ St~ERRV ®®R~/AR® ASLA LAN®SCAPE ARCi~ITECT -PO BOX'-37`66~~ 1514 BUFFEIIR CREEK ROAD D31 VAI~L, COLORADO 81658 March 29, 2Q04 Ms. Lorelei Donaldson, Vail Town Clerk 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Application for a position on the Design Review Board Dear Lorelei: I would like to be considered a candidate to fill the open position on the Town's Design Review Board. I served on the DRB some years back and felt then, as I do still, that it has an important role to play in helping to shape the architectural character and quality of our community. Particularly now, when so many significant redevelopment projects are being proposed in Vail, it would be helpful, I'm sure, to have some board members with experience in the development and design professions. With my background as a landscape architect and resort community planner, as well as almost fiffeen years working on both public and private development projects in the Vail Valley, I feel I could contribute well-reasoned counsel to the deliberations of the Board in the months ahead. Thanks you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Sherry Dorward Enc.: SD resume 970.476.9537 phone/fax 970.470.2930 cell sddorward@msn.com SHERRY DORWARD sddorvvard~msn.com landscape Architect 970.470.2930 cellular P.O. Boz 3766, Vaif; Colorado 81658 970.476.9537 phone/fox EXPEIt1ENCE Sherry Donward landscape Architect PC Vail, Colorado (2002 to present) Principal, Design Workshop, Inc. Vail, Colorado office, 1996-2001 Principal in charge of the office, 1998-2001 Senior Associate, Eldon Beck Associates (EBA), Point Richmond, Calif. Vail, Colorado office, 1992-96 Principal, Geodesign (sole proprietorship, 1982-91) and Alpine international Design (joint venture with EBA, 1990-91) Denver and Vail, Colorado Landscape Architect, Gage Davis Associates, Inc. Boulder, Colorado, 1981-82 Research Fellow, Town Planning Office Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir State, India, 1979-80 Wells Fargo Bank (formerly United Bank of Denver), 1971-76 Commercial Banking Officer (1973-76) Director of Communications (1972-73) EDUCAT-ON`W Master of Landscape Architecture University of California, Berkeley, 1979 Master of Arts (International Development Studies) The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, 1969 Bachelor of Arts (French, German, Economics) University of Colorado, Boulder, 1968 Diplome -Advanced French University of Grenoble, France, 1967 PROFESSIONAL American Society of landscape Architects, 1983 -Present AFFILIATIONS Colorado Master Gardener certification, 2003 ~iUVAR®~ 2003 ®istinguished Aehievement Award, United Veterans ~4IV® H®911®R~ Committee of Colorado, for the design of the Veterans Memorial Cemetery in Grand Junction, Colorado 199 IIAerR Award (Design), Colorado Chapter ASLA, for the design of Seibert Circle Plaza, Vail, Colorado 199B ®utstandiny Senior Landscape Architect, Colorado Chapter ASLA 1996 donor Award from the Colorado Chapter American Planning Association (APA) for the Vail Commons, amixed-use retail and affordable housing project 1994 Honor Award from the Colorado Chapter APA for the Town of Vail Cemetery Master Plan 1991 President's Award, Colorado Chapter ASLA for Design for AAovntaln Communlfles: A Landscape and Archffecfural Guide (book published in 1990, Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY) 1979 Honor Awad, Northern California Chapter ASLA, Redevelopment Plan for Tamalpais Valley, California 1979 Notional AAerit Award, ASLA, for graduate work at UC Berkeley: Commercial/Retail Plaza Design, Harbor Bay Isle, Alameda, California ~R®LrES~I®1+1A~ 2003 Speaker, Sustainable Mountain Communities conference, ~ ITIEa The Banff Centre for Mountain Culture (Banff, Alberta) 2000- Board Member, Betty Ford Alpine Garden Foundation, Vail .1997-02 Art in Public Places Board, Town of Vail, Colorado 2002 Speaker and conference organizing committee, Resort Development in an Era of Globalization (Steamboat Springs) 2000 Speaker, Continuing Legal Education seminar on resod redevelopment (Beaver Creek) 1999 Speaker, Nat'I Ski Areas Assoc. annual meeting (San Francisco) 1999 Speaker, National Soil Conservation Service conference 1999 Speaker, Canada Resort Forum on Mountain Resort Development (Whistler) 1997 Keynote Speaker, International Environmental Design Conference, Yamagata Prefecture, Japan 1992- Lecturer, Departments of Landscape Architecture and Tourism Planning, Colorado State Univ. and University of Colorado; Kansas State University, College of Environmental Design; University of Oregon, School of Architecture 1991-96 Juror, Ski Area Design Awards, Snow Country Magazine 1991 Keynote Speaker, Conference on Ski Resort Des'~gn, Alpine Resorts Commission (Melbourne, Australia) 1990-91 Contributing Editor, Ski I~rea M9anagement Magazine 1990-93 Design Review Board, Town of Vail, Colorado 19x34-97 Board of Trustees, Colorado Outward Bound School 6~ilR~9CeA~1®~l~ 1990 Design for lviountain Communities: A Landscape and Architectural Guide, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York Sherry Durward Landscape Architect PROJECT ' PlANN/NG AND DESIGN fOR COMMUNITIES AND PUBLIC SECTOR CLIENTS EXPERIENCE _ Town of-Vdt, Colorado ^ Vail Memorial Park master plan and phase 1 design (2003-4) • Vail Village Streetscape Design {in progress, with Wenk Assoc., Denver) ^ Donovan Park, landscape design of a 12-acre community park (2001)* ^ Lionshead Sub-Area Redevelopment Master Plan (1997-9)* ^ Seibert Plaza, landscape design (public art competition, 1997-9)* ^ Slifer Plaza and Gore Creek Promenade, conceptual plans ('95, '97) ^ Affordable housing site evaluations, Vail Housing Authority (1996) ^ Vail Commons Mixed-Use/.Affordable Housing Master Plan (1995) • Vail Police/Municipal Facility, site plan and landscape design (1995) ^ Vail Municipal Cemetery Master Plan (1994, with EBA) City of Steambboat Springs, Colorado Steamboat Springs Mountain Town Sub-Area Plan (1998-99)* Munlc)pallfy of Anchoro9e, Alaska ^ Parking design standards for the city of Anchorage (in progress) ^ Girdwood Commercial Areas Master Plan (1998-99)' • Revised Girdwood Design Standards and Guidelines (1995, with EBA) Basalt Regional Ubrary Dlshict Basalt Regional Library-site selection, site planning X2002-3) Eagle Valley Library DisMct, Eagle County, Colorado • Eagle Public Library, site plan and landscape design (1996) • Avon Public Library, site plan and landscape design (1994) . Vail Public Library (1981, as an employee of Gage Davis Assoc.) State o! Colorado Veterans Memorial Cemetery of Western Colorado; Grand Junction, CO Master plan, landscape design, construction management for a 22-acre site { 1999-2001) Colorado Outward Bound School, Denver, Colorado Long-range capital improvements plan for the experiential education school's Leadville Mountain Center wilderness campus (2000-01)* Town of Taos Skl Valley, New Mexico Facilitation of long-range goat-setting and capital improvements planning for town officials (2000)* Aspen, Colorado Aspen Airport ABO General Aviation Terminal, site planning (1995) Snowmasa V1Ua9e Resort Association Facilitation of work sessions with merchants designed to generate strategies for community and commercial improvements (1991, EBA) 'Work done as a principal and projecf manager with Design Workshop Sherry Durward Landscape Architect ;` PR®JECT M®uNT.~lid RES®RT PLe41VNING /IAID ®ES1GA1 ~XPERIEdV~~ _ -- :_ . _:.._ 1~~ P3-~~:P: Vali. ~oiorado= :.. _. Design of a neighborhood park on top of Vail Resorts' proposed underground parking structure (in progress, with Wenk Assoc.) CI'ient: Subcontr®ctor to 42/40 Architecture, inc., Denvef CO Lodge at Vail Residence Club, Vail, Colorado Site planning and landscape design (2001) Client: Vail Resorts Development Co., Jack Hunn, 970-845-2365 Wyndham Peaky Resort, See Forever Village Phase 2e Telluride, C® Site planning, landscape design, and development submittals (2001)' Client: Phoenix Properties, Dallas, TX, Tucker Lynch, 214-880-0350 Villagt at 8reekenridge Mined-flee Complex, Breckenridge, C® Redevelopment plan (1994, with EBA; 2000.1 Client: Vail Resorts Inc., Roger McCarthy, 970-496-3221 Ttse ~®lony at White Pine Cany®n, Summff County, Utah Master plan, design guidelines and landscape design for ahigh-end residential subdivision and ski village on a 4000-acre ranch near Park City (1997-8, 2001 °) + Client: White Pine Associates, Keith Kelley, 435-658-0048 Taos Slci Valley, Taos, New Mexieo Base area redevelopment feasibility and site capacity studies (1949)° Client: Taos Ski Valley, Gordon Briner, 505-776-2291 Wintergreen Resort. Wintergreen. Vdrginia Revised Resort Master Plan (1999)'° Client: Wintergreen Resort Association, Bob Ashton,. ~4-325-8015 San Mlguei Valley Floor Master Plan, Telluride, C® (1996-98) Land use master plan for an 1100-acre parcel Client: San Miguel Valley Corp., Charles Haas, 303-779-8811 yoju Slrl and Golf Resort Nestor Plan. South Kore®(1997-8) ~ilpine isand, Rovtt County, Colorado Master plan for a proposed new resort village on a 1590-acre ranch near Steamboat Springs and Mt. Werner Ski Resort (1994-5, EBA) Client: Alpine Land Associates, Warren Sheridan, 303-778-0900 Work done as a principal and project manager with Design Workshop Sherry Dorwa~d Landscape Architect RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN Sunriver Condbminlurrr Association, Eagle-Vail, master plan-for landscape improvements, construction documentation (2002) The Grand Traverse Subdivision, Vail, CO, site punning, entry signage and landscape design for iridividual homes (1992-97) Strasser Residence, The Colony,.Park City, Utah (in progress) Gustafson Residence, Mountain Star, Avon, Colorado (in progress] La Ostia Ranch (Neely Residence), Taos, New Mexico (in progress) Behler Resldence, The Creamery, Lake Creek, Edwards, CO (2002) Rnlon Resldence, leaser, Colorado (2002) Casteel Creek Ranch, Lake Creek, Eagle County, Colorado (2000-01)* Vague Resldence, Bachelor Gulch, Beaver Creek, Colorado (1999)* Friedman Resldence, Beaver Creek, Colorado (1998)* IAlimer Residences, Cherry Hills (Denver) and Vail, Colorado (1982, 1995) Donlon Resldence, Pass Creek Ranch, Summit County, Colorado (.1995) Talley Resldence, Lake Creek, Eagle County, Colorado (1995) Anderson Resldence, Vail; Colorado (1993) Campbell Resldence, Vail, Colorado (1992) Jack Nicklaus Resldence, Beaver Creek, Colorado (1989-90) Work done ~ a principal and project manager wffh Design Workshop REFERENCES Bob Mclaurin, Former Town Manager, Town of Vail, Colorado 970-479-2105 Tom Nelson, Planning Supervisor, Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska Department of Community Planning and Development 907-343-4865 Kevin Ross, State of Colorado, Division of Veterans Affairs Department of Facilities Management, Denver, Colorado 303-866-7291 Linda levy, Library Director, Basalt Regional Library District, 970-927-4311 Peter Dominick, Managing Partner, 42/40 Architects, Denver, CO 303-292-3388 Keith Kelley, White Pine Associates, Park City, Utah 435-658-0048 Pam Hopkins, Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, Vail, CO 970-476-2201 Don Ensign, Founding Partner, Design Workshop, Aspen, CO 970-925-8354 (Residential client references available upon request) Sherry Donvard landscape Architect 'cJ' RNA ~V1fk~"1}lA'S VA1~ ~ C~ ~t bj ~ ~~a `~~~ 0 4~`~ ~, ~~ ~r~ ; -jam 1;,~~ `-~ ~,,~,., ~ v~ . ~-cN~~;;~ , m,.- fie.. ~-w~. ~. ~ Vo~;.~. ~cn/I~ ~ U,._. rem ~,~ (,~ ~ ,•-e,i,, ~ .~ `~ i~.u,. r~ Va;.k, ~e~ ~-~.s ~i -r riur~~.~ ~.J ~ l~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ J ~~~ ~ ~ ~,- --~ f~l ~P March 10, 1009 Vail Tawn ~ounal Attn: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Gerk 15 S. Frontage {toad Vail, Colorado >! 1651 Re: applicant for Art in Public Places Dear found) Members, I moved to the Vail Valley in June 2000, after I finished my Maste-'s in Architecture. I currently work with Kyle Webb at IC H. Webb Architects pc. Kyle speaks very highly of his involvement with Art in Public Places and has made me excited about the possible opportunity to become involved. To me there is no separation between art and architecture. Since architecture is what I do, I think about art every day and how it affects people. Here in the valley public art reaches out to so many people who live here, but also the large amount of visitors we get yearly. I would very much enjoy the opportunity to be involved with the Town of Vail, and I thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Millie AI nch, oc KH Webb Architects P.C cc Leslie Fickling F M i I l i e A l d r i c h 51297 Beck Gore Dr. A 9 Val, CO millie®khwebb.com ph910.471.2990 OB1E CTIVE I hwe a bakground in architecture and community devdopmerB and woud Ike to offer my personal experiences and ideas in assisting with art in public p~Ces. ^ K. H. Webb Archftects pc • Val, CO Architect (Apn12001-present) Hghend resident~l and commercbl ^ Atlanta • [-dwurds, CO Architect / Desgner (July 2000 -March 2001) Commerc~l -retail, restarrorrt and residental ^ Provence Developmem Group • Greens~ro, NC ProjectMarmgement (1.996.1997). Multi-family and single family communities ^ Designer• Bronson Design Detals-Greeesboro, NC Designer (1994.1995) Residentml -spec and custom homes T E A C H I N G E x P E R I E N C E -OSiI College of Arrhitarhim Gmiimnmanfnl nacinn ^ Res~rch Assistam -Materials Resource Utirary (Spring 1998fa112000) researching new products and mater~ls, organaing seminars ^ Teaher • CAP~trwius • Architecture and Design • Grades 3.5 (Spring 1999•Fall 1999) teaching chidren to communicate thou dens and designs through model building and a variety of med~ Assatant • Planning Departmem/EPA (Spring 1998) ussating in the ctmrette "Sustainabb Neghborhood design for the Desert Southwest" . ^ Araona State University (1991-2000) Masters of Architecture, NAAB Accredited Program • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (1990.1995) BS - Interror Des~n FIDER Accredited Program ^ Royal Melbourne Instihrte of Technobgy • Mdboume, Austrorro 1994 Exchan~ Student ACHIEVEAIENTC Fawhy letter of Commendation for the corgnbution of the V'itruvius Program, M. lane Tanfield Travel Award/Schobrship, Graduate Tuition Schokrrship, Nominated Design Excel~nce FxhibBron, Teaching Assatantship 1 LEADERSHIP ARCON student organaed sympos'srm Assatant for ASU Spring Z0~ Lechrre Series, Coordinator of Material lbrory Organ¢ing Box Lunch Seminars `Mar , 10 04 050 03~ a ICRRRTS 9704764760 ~~%/ R 1 l karats ~~~,~ ~~ rze. ~ ~ ~ ~~,~~ a ~ f ~.. ri ~ ~~~f %Gl ~~' ~~i~~~t,/1~~~~ 's~~~~~ ~ ~/~~~~~ ~~ mil`°~ ~~~~~~~r~'g~ --_~.eeese--~...-- Mar 10 04 05:03p KARATS 9704764760 ~p:~ ~ 't - - - PERSONAL BIOGRAPHY DAN 1 Dan was raised is Iowa. Studied Art Education at VPayae State Teachers College in Nebraska.. Taught art for three years is MichigJ~n. Moved to Vad, Colorado is 1970 where he established a gaIlery for art jewelry. Dan has been making and marketing art jewelry from his gaIlery in Va>7 since 1970. $FT .R.C'TRn EXHIBITIONS Society of North Americas Goldsmiths, Denver Int'1 Airport Invitational Exhibit 2002 Amnedcan Medallic Sculpture Association `°I'he New Medal" 1994 FIDEM E$>nbit, British Museum, London, England 1992 FIDEM Exhibit, Helsinki City Art Museum, Helsinki, Finland 1989 Grapevine Gallery, Oklahoma city, Oklahoma 1986-present Karats Studio Gallery 1985 present Gold and Silversmith of Vail 1970-1983 COIZ.ECTIONS Americas Numismatic Association Museum, Colorado springs, Colorado. Smithsonian , Washington, D.G President & Mts.Getald RFord Tom Brokaw _ , Walter Cronkite H.R.H. The Aga Khan AWARDS The Dallas Market Center's Morais B. Zal_ a Award for R4~pn~+~ in Fine Jewelry R,eta~liag Y987 PUBLICATION Collectyble Sends, Robert K. Liu 1995 Lapidary Journal summer 1993 Ornament Magazine summer 1992 Creative Jewelry Techniques, Harold O'Connor 1978 Skiing Magazine, October 1974 ARTIST STATEMENT In my caeations I use artifacts sad debris, both cultural and physical that strike a universal cold is all of us. Whether it's a contemporary candy heart for Valeatises Day, a 100 year old glass bead, a 2000 year old`ancieat coia, a ,5000 year old stone tool, a 200 mt7lios year old foss>7, as a 4 b~Iion year old meteorite they're all symbols ofour evolution through the continuum of time. This theme highlights the connection we all have between past, present sad future. . PL~4NfiIIRIG AMID EIVVIROIVMERIT~4L COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETII~IG Monday, March 22, 2004 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Gary Hartman Erickson Shirley Doug Cahill Chas Bernhardt Johns Scofield George Lamb Rollie 1(jesbo Site Visits : **RIO LURICH WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THIS MEETING** 1. Driver: MOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm A request for a final review of a proposed amendment to the Town of Vail Official Zoning Map to change the zoning of the West Vail Lodge Properties from Commercial Core 3 (CC3) to High Density Multiple Family (HDMF), located at 2278, 2288, 2298 Chamonix Lane and 2211 North Frontage Road/ Lots 1, 2, 3, and Tract C Vail Das Schone Filing 1 and Inn at West Vail Lot 1, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 3, in accordance with Section 12-3-7, Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vanquish Vail, LLC, represented by Allison Ochs Planner: Matt Gennett Recommendation of Denial It/iOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Gary Hartman VOTE: 6-0 CONDITIONS: Matt Gennett made a presentation per the staff memorandum indicating that staff continued to recommend denial of the request to rezone the property. Staff informed the Commission that in spite of the Commission's explicit direction from the previous meeting, that the applicant had again requested that the rezoning be tabled by the Commission to allow for additional time to revise the application. Following public input on the application, the Commission members indicated that they could not vote in support of the rezoning request as the request did not comply with the goals and objectives of the Vail Land Use Plan and the Zoning Regulations. The Commission members further expressed their disappointment with the applicant stating that the applicant had clearly abused the process, wasted valuable time, and failed to even attempt to cooperate with the Commission and staff when the Commission and staff had made every attempt to work with the applicant's needs. 2. Information Update 3. Adjournment ~~ ,a TOWN OF PAIL ~ MOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Gary Hartman VOTE: 6-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published, March 5, 2004 in the Vail Daily. 2 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA March 17, 2004 3:00 P.M. FINAL MEETING MINUTES PUBLIC MEETING PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT David Viele Bill Pierce Scott Proper Hans Woldrich PUBLIC WELCOME MEMBERS ABSENT Margaret Rogers SITE VISITS 1. Loper Residence- 22 West Meadow Drive 2. Wisenbaker Residence- 153 Beaver Dam 3. Shirley Residence- 303 Gore Creek Drive 4. Hughes Residence- 303 Gore Creek Drive 5. Mahoney Residence- 433 Gore Creek Drive 6. Rechter Residence- 4917 Juniper Lane 7. O'Loughlin Residence- 5148 Main Gore Drive 8. Vail Gymnastics Facility- 551 N. Frontage Road 9. Hampton Residence- 1175 Casolar Del Norte Drive 10. Schmid/Hubbard - 2683 Cortina Lane 11. Broer Residence- 2830 Basingdale Road 12. Dantas Residence- 2735 Snowberry Drive 13. Marriott's Vail Mountain Resort- 715 West Lionshead Circle 11:30 am 2:30 pm Driver: George PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm Loper Residence DR604-0042 Bill Final review of an alteration to amulti-family residence 22 West Meadow Drive #360/Lot H, Vail Village Filing 2 Applicant: Michael Sanner MOTION: VIELE SECOND: PROPER VOTE: 4-0 STAFF IS DIRECTED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM IF THE APPLICANT REVISES THE PLANS TO ALIGN THE PROPOSED WINDOW GEOMETRY; HOWEVER, IF THE APPLICANT IS UNABLE TO ALIGN THE WINDOW GEOMETRY THEN THIS ITEM IS TABLED TO APRIL 7, 2004. 1 ~, TOWN OR PAIL ~t 2. O'Loughlin Residence DRB04-0041 Bill Final review of a residential addition 5148 Main Gore Drive/Lot11, Vail Meadows Subdivision Filing 1 Applicant: Tab Associates MOTION: VIELE SECOND: PROPER VOTE:4-0 TABLED TO APRIL 7, 2004 3. Shirley Residence DRB04-0036 Bill Final review of a residential addition 303 Gore Creek Drive/Lot 8, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Erickson Shirley, represented by K.H. Webb Architects P.C. MOTION: PROPER SECOND: VIELE VOTE:4-0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL EXTEND THE PARAPET WALL AND THE DECK RAIL SHALL NOT. INTERUPT THE ROOF PLANE OF UNIT 9. 4. Hughes Residence DR604-0056 Bill Final review of proposed residential addition 303 Gore Creek Drive/Lot 7, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Ron Hughes, represented by Shepherd Resources, Inc. MOTION: PROPER SECOND: VIELE VOTE:4-0 APPROVED 5. Snowcat Access DR603-0476 Final ,review of proposed snowcat access road and bridge Bill Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Vail Resorts, Inc. represented by Braun Associates, Inc. MOTION: PROPER SECOND: WOLDRICH VOTE:4-0 STAFF IS DIRECTED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM IF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF THE ASSOCIATED WALL HEIGHT VARIANCE IS UPHELD BY THE TOWN COUNCIL; HOWEVER, IF THE ASSOCIATED VARIANCE APPROVAL IS NOT UPHELD THEN THIS ITEM IS TABLED TO APRIL 7, 2004. 6. Schmid/Hubbard Residence DRB04-0031 Bill Final review of a new primary/secondary residence and Type II EHU 2683 Cortina Lane/Lot 7, Block A, Vail Ridge Applicant: Stefan Schmid, represented by Larry Benway MOTION: VIELE SECOND: PROPER VOTE:4-0 TABLED TO APRIL 7, 2004 7. W.L. Broer Construction Company DRB04-0052 Matt Conceptual review of a residence addition 2830 Basingdale Road/Lot 5, Block 9, Vail Intermountain Applicant: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 2 8. Mahoney Residence DRB040053 Matt Final review of a minor alteration 433 Gore Creek Drive Unit 15/Lot 15, Block 4,Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Steve Riden MOTION: VIELE SECOND: WOLDRICH VOTE: 4-0 CONDITIONS: TABLED TO APRIL ~, 2004 9. Vail Gymnastics Facility DRB04-0061 Matt Final review of a public indoor community facility 551 North Frontage Road West/Lot 8A, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch Applicant: Town of Vail MOTION: PROPER SECOND: WOLDRICH VOTE: 2-0-2 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: 'I. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE A CORNICE DETAIL ALONG THE TOP OF THE PARAPET WALL ON THE ROOF AND SHOW THIS ON THE BUILDING PERMIT SET OF PLANS UPON SUBMITTAL. 2. AT LEAST 15 ASPEN TREE ARE TO BE PLANTED ON THE AGREED UPON AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED TO PLANNING PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. 3. THE METAL AWNINGS OVER THE WINDOWS AND ENTRIES WILL BE BAKED ENAMEL TREATED AND PAINTED WITH BENJAMIN MOORS HC'124 10. Reske Residence DR604-0034 Matt Final review of a new single-family residence 2319 Chamonix Road/Lot 1, Block A, Vail das Schone Filing 1 Applicant: Brian Reske MOTION:VIELE SECOND:PROPER VOTE:4-0-0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: 1. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NEW PLAN FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY THAT IS COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WITH THE NEIGHBOR AND AVOIDS A DOUBLE WALL. 11. Wisenbaker Residence DRB04-0069 Bill Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence 153 Beaver Dam/Lot 37, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Steve Wisenbaker_ CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 12. Marriott's Vail Mountain Resort DR604-0062 Warren Conceptual review of a minor exterior alteration or modification 715 West Lionshead Circle/ Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 and Lots C & D, Morcus Subdivision Applicant: Vail Corporation, represented by Mauriello Planning Group MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 13. Peters Chalet DR603-0430 Warren Final review of a residential addition to asingle-family residence 2955 Bellflower Drive/Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Alan and Francine Peters 3 MOTION: VIELE SECOND: PROPER VOTE: 4-0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: 1. THE APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT A TOWN OF VAIL REVOCABLE RIGHT-OF- WAYPERMIT FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR BUILDING PERMITS. 2. THAT THE DEED RETRICTION FOR THE TYPE 1 EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT RESUBMITTED TO STAFF FOR RECORDING WITH EAGLE COUNTY PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. 14. Slifer Building DRB04-0037 Warren Conceptual review of a minor alteration to a commercial building 230 Bridge Street/Lot B, Block 5-C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Rodney E. Slifer MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE STAFF IS DIRECTED TO STAFF APPROVE THIS ITEM IF THE APPLICANT SUBMITS AN AWNING MATERIAL SAMPLE, CUT SHEETS FOR ALL LIGHTING, AND THE NOTCH IS MADE TO BE 6 INCHES DEEPER FORA, TOTAL OF A 12 INCHES OFFSET FROM THE BUILDING FACE TO THE SOUTH, TO STAFFS SATISFACTION. 15. Lionshead Ski Bridge DR604-0004 Warren Final review of proposed Lionshead skier bridge Tracts B and C, Vail Lionshead Filing 1; Tract B, Vail Lionshead Filing 3: Tract X, Forest Place Subdivision Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. MOTION:PROPER SECOND:VIELE VOTE:4-0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS AND A REVISED PLAN WHICH ADJUSTS THE BIKE PATH ALIGNMENT, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. 2. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE TO STAFF FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL UPON COMPLETION OF THE GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF THE SUPPORTING FOOTERS FOR THE BRIDGE IN ORDER T VERIFY THAT NO GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION OCCURRED WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. 3. THAT THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ESTABLISH THE FINAL LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED GARAGE EXHAUST VENT WHICH I SHOWN UNDER THE NORTH BRIDGE ABUTMENT. IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THE EVENTFUL PROPOSED CORE SITE HOTEL IT MAY DETERMINED THAT THERE IS A BETTER LOCATION FOR EXHAUST VENT. 4. THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN THE APPROPIATE STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE GORE CREEK PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 16. Dantas Residence DRB04-0076 George Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence 2735 Snowberry Drive/Lot 12, Block 7, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Dave Dantas MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL- NO VOTE 4 17. Dantas Residence DRB04-0076 George Final review of a new single-family residence 1936 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 46, Vail Village West Filing 2 Applicant: Mike Dantas MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: APPROVED 18. O'Dorisio Residence DR603-0312 Warren Final review of a residential addition 4444 Streamside Circle/Lot 11, Bighorn Addition 4 Applicant: Tom and Sue O'Dorisio, represented by John Perkins MOTION:VIELE SECOND:VVOLDRICH VOTE:4-0 APPROVED lAIITH CONDITIONS: 1. THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A TOliVN OF VAIL REVOCABLE RIGHT-OF-WAV FOR ALL IMPROVEMETNS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY TO SUBMITTING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. 19. Hampton Residence DRB04-0059 George - Final review of a minor alteration 1175 Casalor Del Norte Drive/Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: !ftlITHDRAlftlN BY APPLICANT 20. Rechter Residence DRB04-0049 Warren Conceptual review of residential addition 4917 Juniper Lane/ Lot 5, Block 4, Bighorn Subdivision Addition 5 Applicant: Bonnie and Sam Rechter, represented by Piper Architects MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL- NO VOTE Staff Approvals Blue Tiger DRB04-0048 Final review of a new sign 1310 Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village Applicant: Neil Soritkin Aspen Ridge Road LLC- DR604-0045 Final review of an alteration to asingle-family residence 1675 Aspen Ridge Road/Lot 6, Block 4, Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing 3 Applicant: Mike Spriggs, Manager for Aspen Ridge Shaper Residence DRB04-0017 Change to approved plans 2645 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13 Steve and Susan Shaper, represented by Segerberg Mayhew Associates Warren Joe Bill The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. 5 Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356,Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 6 a:' ,. ~ .. TO OF V~IIs ° Department of Public Works & Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2158 Fay: 970-479-2166 www. vailgov. com To: Vail Town Council From: Gregg Barrie Department of Public Works Re: Pirateship Park Renovation Date: April 6, 2004 Per the direction provided by the Town Council on December 16, 2003, Staff has gathered input from neighbors of Pirateship Park, prepared a Site Plan that includes a swing set, and compiled a cost estimate based on several contractor's preliminary review of the project. Staff requests that the Town Council consider the several items outlined below, and approve the Site Plan so that final pricing and design work can be completed. Please see the attached Site Plan, Photo Simulations, and Pirateship Elevation for more information. A. Site Plan The Proposed Site Plan maintains the compact nature of the existing park, while at the same time providing atwo-bay swing set, turf areas for picnic tables, and the required access for persons with disabilities. When compared to the existing park, there are more play opportunities provided in only a slightly larger area, and the play structure and accompanying play pieces are designed to accommodate children from ages 2 through 12. In addition, new landscaping will accent and enhance the park area. B. Swing Set As requested, Staff prepared several options for placement of a 2-bay swing set. Given the size and shape of the Pirateship structure, the large area required for the safe placement of any swing set, and the comments of the neighbors, Staff feels that the proposed location is the most efficient and effective placement if a swing is to be included in the design. Advantages: breaks up large expanses of safety surfacing, places swings away from heavy circulation patterns, provides an important and much requested play feature Estimated Cost: $14,500 C. ~leighborhood input The Proposed Site Plan was presented to the surrounding neighbors including Martha Head, Mr. and Mrs. Howard Berkowitz, the Bridge Street Lodge HOA, and Paul and Sally Johnston. In addition, the East Village Homeowners Association mailed and emailed copies of the plan to its members. In general, comments were positive and supportive. Specific comments are listed below: Martha Head, 325 Mill Creek Circle: Mrs. Head was presented with two swing location options. She preferred this Proposed Site Plan as she felt the swings would be less intrusive in this location. The other option placed the swing near her fence. In addition, she indicated a desire for some type of lighting to be provided in the park. See Item D for additional information on lighting. RECS'CLED PAPER a Howard and Judy Berkowitz 315 Mill Creek Circle: Mr. and Mrs. Berkowitz have two main concerns. The first is eliminating "after-hours" use of the park, the second is in regards to the safety of any swing, regardless of location: They would prefer that only tot swings (ages 2-5) be included in the park. They feel that eliminating the belt swings (ages 5-12) will cut down on late night use, and given the proposed location of the belt swings, would reduce activity near their house. Mrs. Berkowitz feels that belt swings introduce a significant safety hazard, especially with unattended children in the play area. In discussions about lighting, they felt that low level lighting may encourage late night use, however, they were supportive of the idea of using motion sensor lighting to discourage illicit activities. See Item D for additional information on lighting. Regardless of the swing -ocation they would welcome the idea of extending the existing split rail fence along the property line, and potentially adding some new spruce trees for screening. Paul and Sally Johnston, Christiania Lodge: Mr. and Mrs. Johnston were presented with a "photo- simulation" of the proposed Pirateship structure as viewed from the pool area of the Christiania Lodge (see attached). They have been generally supportive of the project. Written approval must be obtained from the owners of the Christiania Lodge for any changes to the park as they hold a view corridor easement across the property. This will be requested once the site plan is approved by Town Council. Bridge Street Lodge HOA: The Proposed Site Plan was presented at the annual board meeting on March 6. Comments included support for the inclusion of a swing set, support for providing play activities for the 2-5 year old age group, and support for low level lighting for security reasons. East Village Home Owners Association: Jim Lamont feels that there is a need to "clean up" the section of Mill Creek adjacent to the park. Staff will assess the nature and extent of this work once the snow melts. Part of the Proposed Site Plan places several boulders along the stream bank to stabilize some erosion. However, due to budget constraints, Staff is hesitant to recommend major stream work to be funded from the Pirateship Park budget. If this work is determined to be necessary, it could be performed in the fall when the creek will be temporarily diverted for the replacement of the culvert on Hanson Ranch Road. D. Lighting As stated above, several of the neighbors have requested that some sort of low level lighting be included in the park. In addition, the Vail Police Department has indicated that lighting would be welcomed in order to discourage illicit activities in the park at night. Currently, the park is extremely dark after sunset. In conversations with the Police, it was determined that two types of lighting would be helpful. First, three bollard lights, like the ones installed along the Streamwalk, would be installed around the play area to provide a very low level of site lighting. Second, the installation of a light inside of the Pirateship structure, connected to a motion sensor, would help to alert patrolling officers as to the presence of people inside the structure. In both instances, the lighting will likely discourage illicit activities, but may encourage night time use of the play equipment. Estimated Cost: $12,000 E. Budget and Schedule Current cost estimates based on 80% drawings indicate that the project can be constructed within the $300,000 budget. Staff is requesting approval of the Proposed Site Plan, including the swings and lighting, at this time. Subsequent to approval, Staff will finalize Construction Documents and seek Final Proposals from interested contractors. It is estimated that. it will take approximately 60 days to build the steel frame of the Pirateship. Given that time frame, site work would likely begin on the project in late June, or shortly after July 4. Scheduling the project between the.spring and fall phases of the Village Streetscape Project will allow for additional contractors to submit competitive proposals on the project. Staff will present the final project cost to the Town Council prior to awarding the contract. Staff estimates approximately 60 days for the construction of the site work and completion of the project. I r I ~. r 't 9 i 1 t t _ e .- e __'- `. ~. ,.. , _ ~ - ,. ~ - _~... t ,.... _ .:.- ~,....-, ~ t E - I i Y, ~~ ' -.~ i L ' ~ r/ .. ~r j i ~. ~ ~~ .._._._ f. S{ ~ _ _._ _ ~ € , ~ Jib a ~ ,. ___., _ __ ~~ ~/ ~ ~ i ,> ~_ ... ~_....m_ _.._.v 1 ~~~ ~, - _ ---~ ~ _ r ~ .__.. _.__..._. ~ _ . ~ ~ jr ~.~ .~..__ - . ti ~ _. _ . __ _ ~.._ i .. r,. _.____ ~ __..__.__ _ _._~..~._..~ ti ~_ Pirateship Park Renovation "Photo Simulation" of Model superimposed on a site photograph of the exsiting park April 6, 2004 Existing ~~ I~~~LI~ IVIEETIIVG IV®1°oCE !TAIL REINVESTMENT Al1THORITY MEETING AGEN®A TOES®AV, APRIL 6, 2004 4:45 P. M. Following Work Session Vs61 Reinvest¢nent Authority Will Convene VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: Euecutive Sessioa~ C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b) Russ Forrest P3 Condemnation Agreement (20 min.) (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)