Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-06-01 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessionr TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA 11:30 A.M. TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2004 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1 • ITEM/TOPIC: Lunch for Council and Staff at the Fire Station before the Work Session. (60 min.) 2• ITEM/TOPIC: Site Visit: Middle Creek. Please wear appropriate footwear and meet at TOV parking lot to van to site (60 min.) 3. Matt Mire ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(b) Conference with Attorney, re: Council Training (30 min.) 4• ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update (10 min.) 5. Pam Brandmeyer ITEM/TOPIC: Year to date financial results and out- Stan Zemler of-cycle requests for funding. (30 min.) CURRENT GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES A. Red Sandstone multi-use recreation facility. Please see memorandum RETT CAPITAL FUNDING PROGRAM B. AIPP-Artist in Residence Building BACKGROUND INFORMATION: AIPP is requesting the town partner in its effort to renovate the Anholtz Ranch cabin located on the lower bench of Ford Park. The goal of the project is to turn the cabin into an artist-in-residence program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Fund $40,000 of $78,000 request, utilizing RETT funds. COUNCIL CONTRIBUTION C. Channel s BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Earlier this year in a status review re: Channel 5, Council directed Channel 5 to return in June • for an out-of--cycle funding request for equipment upgrades and replacement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny Funding D. WCTB Community_Host Program BACKGROUND INFORMATION:. In order to get the WCTB in sync with current year and '05 requests, staff has asked them for separate submittal for parking passes for the '04-05 ski season, and then Council wilt see the WCTB back in August for the '05- '06 ski season. In the past, the Community Host program has been funded through a 25 blue parking pass contribution from the Town of Vail, as well as a matching 25 Merchant Ski Pass contribution from Vail Resort, with the WCTB providing oversight and management of the volunteers. In addition to the 25 blue parking passes, you will note a request from Suzanne Silverthorn attached asking for nine more parking passes to cover the '04= 05 fall/spring construction volunteers. The additional 9 parking passes will allow the WCTB to staff the following days and times that you originally requested being two people from Sept 7 -Oct 17, 10am - 6pm (eight hours/day) and one person Oct 18 - 30, same hours. This would be 744 hours total for the fall. Each host works 80 hours to fulfill their requirement for a ski pass/parking pass, subsequently the WCTB requires an additional 9.3 blue passes to facilitate the Hosts during the fall. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Fund 34 blue parking passes for '04-'05 ski season. FUTURE GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES E. Department of Justice ADA Requirements BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Staff has received a preliminary estimate (attached) for the town's ADA compliance costs of $116,822. Since the estimate was received at 9:00 A.M. Thursday, May 27, staff has not had the opportunity to research how to pay for these federally mandated requirements. A portion of the requirements are directly related to parks and recreation facilities that the town oversees, so an estimate of costs appropriate as a charge-back to AIPP will be suggested. Additionally, staff will look at current capital projects already funded in '04 to evaluate whether Council might consider moving those into '05 in order to reallocate funding. Also, there may be some additional cost savings based on "interpretation" of the taw and we will continue to work with the Department of Justice to understand the requirements. Staff will return on the 15th of June for further discussion of funding sources. The Department of Justice has imposed a timeframe of June 14, 2004, to sign the stipulation decree. Staff requests Council authorize the Town Manager to enter into said stipulation because the next - -Council- meeting; at which- time staff will present options for funding, does not occur within the June 14th timeframe. 6: Bill Gibson ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, an ordinance amending Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, to amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulations in the Hillside Residential (HR), Single-Family Residential (SFR),Two-Family Residential (R), Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS). (60 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On September 8, 2003, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission. voted 6-0 to forward a recommendation of approval for proposed text amendments to the gross residential floor area (GRFA) regulations for Vail's residential zone districts. This item was tabled for further discussion from the Town Council's May 18, 2004, meeting. 7• ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from the Mayor (10 min.) 8• ITEMlTOPIC: Adjournment (3:30 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 2 P.M. TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2004 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 6 P.M. TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2004, IN VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. • PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION • PUBLIC MEETING Monday, May 24, 2004 NO LUNCH _ PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:45 pm MEMBERS PRESENT David Viele Anne Gunion Bill Jewitt Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill George Lamb Rollie Kjesbo MEMBERS ABSENT Site Visits 1. The Wren - 500 South Frontage Road West Driver: George NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the Commission may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. • Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, to allow for the conversion of an existing commercial unit to a residential dwelling unit, located at 500 South Frontage Road West, Unit B-111 (The Wren)/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Michael D. Krohn Planner: Matt Gennett APPROVED WITH AN AMENDED CONDITION 1. That the applicant plants a minimum of three, 10' tall evergreen trees on the northeast corner of the property near the existing trash enclosure, irrigated with the existing system, to better screen the parking and trash enclosure from view prior to the issuance of a building permit for Unit 6111. The final location shall be reviewed and approved by staff. MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 6-1(Lamb Opposed) Matt Gennett made a representation per the staff memorandum dated May 24, 2004. Based upon the review of the application and the criteria as outlined in the staff memorandum, staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request. Staff's recommendation of approval carried with it one condition as outlined on page 8 of the staff memorandum. The applicant had nothing new to add to the presentation. There was no public comment. The Commissioners discussed the application and expressed a concern with the proposed condition as stated regarding required ', landscaping and compliance with 12-6H-11 of the Vail Town Code. The Commissioners generally • agreed that the proposal complies with the criteria as outlined in the staff memorandum. T~WNOFt~AlL 2. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12- • 7H-7, Vail Town Code, and a request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of the Lionshead Core Site Hotel and the operation on a new private skier club, new lodge dwelling units and conference facilities and meeting rooms on the first floor or street level floor of a structure, located at 675 Lionshead Place/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon. request). Applicant: Vail Corporation Planner: George Ruther TABLED TO JUNE 14, 2004 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND.. Viele VOTE:7-0 Russ Forrest made a presentation per the staff memorandum dated May 24, 2004. As this is not a final review of a proposed application, staff is not making a recommendation at this time. Doug Cahill asked about the over all timeline, to which Russ Forrest responded that we are still on course. Tom Braun, of Braun Associates, gave a presentation on the overall design of the project. Geoff Wright, speaking on behalf of the Landmark Condominium Association questioned the east-west orientation of the building, the location of build to lines and the ability to maintain similar rights of access to build to lines, and lastly, questioned how emergency access to the west end of Lionshead would be addressed. The Commissioners expressed concern with regard to building height and the arrangement of the building mass on the site. Suggestions for rearranging the bulk and mass was made to improve upon the scale and character of the building in context to the urban design Lionshead. Questions of pedestrian flow and circulation around all of Lionshead were raised. A fear of creating a black hole was expressed and suggestions for improving the pedestrian traffic flow were provided. The Commissioners requested information from staff regarding compliance with zoning • regulations and master plans recommendations (ie, master plan recommendations, sun/shade analysis, pedestrian scale model, etc.). The Commissioners agreed that the buildings were nicely designed and well thought out but questioned the future build out scenario given this design. A recommendation for breaking down continuous ridgelines was suggested. 3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, to allow for the redevelopment of the Manor Vail Lodge, and a request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of Type III Employee Housing Units, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3, Vail Town Code, located at 595 Vail Valley Drive/Lots A, B, & C, Vail Village 7th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Manor Vail, represented by Melick and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell TABLED TO JUNE 14, 2004 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: ?-0 4. A request for a variance from Section 12-21-14, Restrictions In Specific Zones On~ Excessive Slopes, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of driveways and surface parking in excess of 10% of the total site area, located at 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Block G, Vail das Schone Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Snow Now, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell TABLED TO JUNE 14, 2004 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE:7-0 5. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow • for a new single family residence to exceed the allowable building height, located at 4916 Juniper Lane/Lot 4, Block 5, Bighorn Subdivision 5th Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Viking Limited, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects Planner: Matt Gennett 2 WITHDRAWN 6. An appeal of an administrative interpretation of Section 12-15-3(A)(1)(d), Definition, Calculation, • and Exclusions Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-3(B), Administrative Action, Vail Town Code, determining that a proposed unenclosed area shall not be .considered (GRFA) in the GRFA calculation for the Purchase Residence, located at 1310 Greenhill Court/Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Appealant: Barry E. Cunningham Planner: Matt Gennett ' WITHDRAWN 7. Approval of minutes MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: ?-0 8. Information Update • GRFA 9. Adjournment MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Jewitt VOTE:?-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) • 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published, May 21, 2004 in the Vail Daily. • 3 ~.: • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA May 19, 2004 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING , PUBLIC WELCOME • • PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT Joe Hanlon Bill Pierce Scott Proper Margaret Garvey Rogers Diana Mathias SITE VISITS 1. Gannett - 796 Forest Road 2. Hawkwood - 483 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 5B 3. Irwin - 1956 West Gore Creek Drive 5. Perkins - 2568 Arosa Drive 6. Kaufman - 4515 Bighorn Road 7. Dauskurdas - 4937 Juniper Lane 8. Ginsberg - 2950 Booth Creek Drive 0 12:00 pm 2:00 pm Driver: George PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Hawkwood Inc. Residence DRB04-0141 ' Conceptual review of a residential addition 483 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 5B /Lot 56, Vail Village Filing 4 Applicant: Hawkwood, Inc. represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 2. Kaufman Residence DRB04-0140 Final review of a residential addition 4515 Bighom Road /Lot D, Spruce Park Estates Applicant: Steven Kaufman MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH TWO CONDITIONS 3:00 pm George Warren 1-That the applicant record an amended plat for Spruce Park Estates, A Resubdivision of Lots 6 ~ 7, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision Third Addition; Amended Plat, which revises the existing plat to include the new addition on Lot D as identified on the existing plat, prior to 'requesting either a Temporary Certificate. of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy. ~~ 1 ~o~voFV~ `' MEMBERS ABSENT 2-That the plans submitted for a building permit include a limits of disturbance • fence shown on the plans. 3. Gannett Residence DRB04-0145 George Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence 796 Forest Road /Lot 13, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6 Applicant: Doug & Kathy Gannett, represented by Steve Riden CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 4. Dauskurdas Residence DRB04-0148 Matt Final review of a residential addition 4937 Juniper Lane /Lot 4, Block 4, Bighorn 5~' Addition Applicant: Galen A. Aasland, Architect, P.C. MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Mathias VOTE: 4-1 (Proper Opposed) APPROVED CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION 1- If the copper metal flashing proposed by the applicant is not feasible, metal.flashing painted a dark color is acceptable. 5. Perkins Residence DRB04-0157 Bill Final review of a minor alteration 2568 Arosa Drive/Lot 4, Block C, Vail Das Schone Filing 1 Applicant: Mary E. Perkins MOTION: Proper SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 2-3 (Pierce, Rogers, • Mathias Opposed) DENIED CONDITIONS: The applicant shall submit a new application for Design Review to the Community Development Department proposing a revised color scheme by no later than May 24, 2004. The applicant shall then appear before the Town of Vail Design Review Board on Wednesday, June 16, 2004 for consideration of the amended application. Depending upon the outcome of the review on June 16th, the applicant shall be required to paint the residence the colors approved on June 16th or repaint the residence the original colors as they existed prior to illegally painting the residence without approval. 6. Ginsberg Residence DRB04-0150 Matt Final review of a residential addition 2950 Booth Creek Drive /Lot 2, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 11 Applicant: John M. Perkins MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Mathias VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED CONDITIONS:' NONE 7. Devaney Residence DRB04-0098 Warren Final review of a residential addition 2565 Cortina Lane/Lot 2, Blocfc F, Vail das Schone Filing 1 Applicant: Elfriede Devaney MOTION: ~ Rogers SECOND: Mathias VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED • CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION 1-That the applicant revise the south elevation, prior to submitting for a building permit, to have the proposed doors for the new units on top of the garage match identically. 2 r • 8. VML, LLC DRB04-0146 George Final review of changes to approved plans 352 East Meadow Drive, Unit 1 /Tract B, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Zehren and Associates, Inc., represented by Tim Losa MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Proper VOTE: 5-0 TABLED TO JUNE 2, 2004 9. Irwin Residence DRB04-0111 Matt Conceptual review of a residential addition 1956 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 45, Vail Village West Filing 2 Applicant: David Irwin CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE 10. West Vail Lodge DR604-0188 Matt Final review of a new sign 2278, 2288, 2298 Chamonix Lane and 2211 North Frontage Road/ Lots 1, 2, 3, and Tract C Vail Das Schone Filing 1 and Inn at West Vail Lot 1, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 3 Applicant: Raj Bhakta MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Proper VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH FOUR CONDITIONS 1-That the applicant installs black, metal lettering pinned into the stucco face. • 2- Only two landscape lights for each face of the sign are permitted (no soffit lights) to be installed at time of construction. 3 -The applicant will ensure the roof over the sign matches the building's roof prior to the issuance of a TCO. 4 -The applicant shall make the lettering of this monument sign no larger than 10.5 square feet upon installation as permitted 11. Basingdale 5 LLC DRB04-0144 Final review of a new primary/secondary residence 2830 Basingdale Blvd. /Lot 5, Block 9, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Peter Cope MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Pierce DENIED 12. Gramalegui Residence DRB04-0162 Final review of changes to approved plans 2614 Larkspur Lane/Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Greg Gramalegui MOTION: Proper SECOND: Mathias APPROVED CONDITIONS: • 13. Vail Resorts (Golden Peak) DRB04-0187 Final review of a minor alteration Tract E, Vail Village Filing 5 Applicant: Vail Resorts VOTE: 4-0-1 (Proper Abstained) Matt George VOTE: 3-2 (Hanlon, Rogers Opposed) Russ 3 MOTION: Proper SECOND: Rogers VOTE: 5-0 . TABLED TO JUNE 2, 2004 Staff Approvals Richmond-Essl Residence DRB04-0155 Bill Final review of a minor alteration 1090 Vail View Drive, Unit 3 (Telemark Townhomes)/Lot 61, Block B, Lions Ridge Filing 1 Applicant: Eagle County Images Dore Residence DRB04-0151 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 100 Vail Road/Lot 35, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Alpine Construction & Remodel Browning Residence DRB04-0152 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 641 West Lionshead Circle, Unit 222/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Bartock Builders, lnc., represented by Greg Bartock Terhar Residence DR604-0172 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 1650 Sunburst Drive, Unit 56/Lot 56, Vail Golf Course Townhome Applicant: John Terhar, represented by ASE, Inc. • Stempler Residence DR604-0174 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 1044 Homestake Circle/Lot 4, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 7 Applicant: Gerald Stempler, represented by Wing Construction Rimski, Inc. Residence DR604-0173 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 394 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 7, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 3 Applicant: John Milligan Vail Run Resort Alteration DRB04-0176 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 1000 Lions Ridge Loop/Lot C-11, Lions Ridge Filing 1 Applicant: Mike Krohn, Rusty Spike Enterprises Dougherty Residence DRB04-0122 Matt Final review of a minor alteration 2039 Sunburst Drive, Units A 8~ B/Lot 16, Vail Valley Filing 3 Applicant: Bill Joseph and Associates, Inc. ' The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- • 2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 4 • MEMORANDUM To: Town Council From: Pam Brandmeyer Judy Camp Stan Zemler Date: May 27, 2004 Subject: Mid-Year Funding Financial Results through April A summary of General Fund financial results through April is attached. Although results aze favorable versus budget across the board, staff does not recommend any significant changes to the budget at this time. Sales tax, our most important source of revenue, is favorable to budget by $190,677 or 4.8% through Mazch collections, which are included in April results. However, we have just entered atwo-month construction period for the Village Streetscape with another two months of construction scheduled for the fall. Although the favorable collections to date are encouraging, they could be eroded by the uncertainty of the next several months. Compensation to-date also looks favorable. This is expected in part because the budget • assigns compensation equally across twelve months of the year, while most salary increases occur in June. Thus, we expect to be somewhat under budget in the first five months and somewhat over budget in the last seven months with the variances offsetting by year-end. Also, some benefits are reconciled and recorded only at yeaz end, thus creating some favorability during the year. ' Since out-of--cycle contributions aze a major component of Tuesday's discussion, we have also attached a schedule of contributions paid through April. Although again, the budget calendarization assumes equal disbursements over 12 months, payments are made differently for each group. No disbursements have been made to the VCBA through April pending completion of a contract. The chamber has agreed that the town may set aside $50,000 of the $200,000 budgeted because the town contributed more in 2003 than the VCBA spent. This money would then be earmarked for future economic development research. The 2004 contribution of $75,000 planned for the Pro Cycling Tour at Vail has also not been paid yet. • 040527 Mid-YEar Funding _ 1 _ Version 1 • • TOWN OF VAIL SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES AS OF 4/30/04 GENERAL FUND Revenue Local Taxes: Sales Tax Property and Ownership Ski Lift Tax Franchise Fees, Penalties, and Other Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Revenue Transportation Centers Charges for Services Fines 8 Forteitures Earnings on Investments Rental Revenue Miscellaneous and Project Reimbursements Total Revenue 2004 2004 2004 Amended Amended 2004 Budget Budget Budget Actuals as of 4/30/04 as of 4/30/04 5 8,835,480 8,881,480 ~ 3,940,149 4,130,826 2,646,855 2,646,945 882,290 984,530 2,420,500 2,420,500 1,691,887 1,750,098 643,500 643,500 214,492 254,968 986,320 986,320 234,174 215,078 1,318,775 1,351,989 442,828 437,118 2,928,500 2,945,700 1,817,423 1,803,722 807,485 607,485 202,801 149,338 189,250 189,250 83,072 92,412 109,000 109,000 36,332 - 707,142 707,142 235;704 260,312 36,950 98,397 18,810 52 532 21,427,757 21,587,708 9,779,962 10130 932 Variance Fav(Unfav) 190,677 102,240 58,209 40,478 (19,096) (5,710) (13,701) (53,483) 29,340 (36,332) 24,808 33,722 350,970 Expenditures Salaries Overtime Benefits Subtotal Compensation and Benefits Contributions and Special Events All Other Operating Expenses Heavy Equipment Operating Charges Heavy Equipment Replacement Charges Dispatch Services Total Expenditures Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance GF yr to date 040527 9,399,864 9,581,932 3,118,808 2,985,714 130,894 444,047 453,997 149,819 165,774 (15,955) 3,400,578 3,447,386 1,128,070 1,008 808 117,262 13,244,487 13,463,295 4,392,497 4,160296 232,201 1,167,348 1,187,348 385,224 400,047 (14,823) 4,575,345 4,681,257 1,544,815 1,384,251 160,564 1,463,158 1,469,908 585,263 578,900 6,363 405,467 405,467 162,187 150,851 11,536 463,813 463,813 153,058 154 804 (1,548) 21,319,816 21,651,086 7,223,044 6,828 749 394,295 108,141 (63,378) 2,556,918 3,302183 745,265 9,016,571 10,470,987 $ 9,124,712 $ 10,407,609 -2- • • • Vendor Vail Community TV-Cnnl 5 Eagle Valley Child Care Bravo! NY Philharmonic Bravo! Colorado Vail Valley Foundation-Hot Summer Nights Vail Valley Foundation-Int'I Dance Festival Vail Valley Foundation-Street Beat WCTB-merged Chamber operations WCTB-Information Services Vail Jazz Foundation 2009 World Champions Vail Farmers Market Traffic Control Rocky Mountain Bike Classic Vail Chamber & Business Assoc Vail Valley Athletic Club Youth Recognition Award Vail Valley Foundation-Amercian Ski Classic Spring Back to Vail Holidays In Vail Street Entertainment King of the Mtn Volleyball "Y05" NY Eve for Youth Western Regional Softball Big Wheel Bres N' Chili Taste of Vail Administrative Services Event Recruitment Research Event Evaluation Total Disbursements 2004 Paid to date Remaining Dollars Budget 4/30/04 to disperse Reasoning 57,000 16,540 40,460 quarterly disbursements 30,000 7,875 22,125 quarterly disbursements 95,000 95,000 _ 21,375 21,375 _ 20,000 20,000 _ 12, 500 12, 500 _ 16,571 16,571 _ 25,000 25;000 _ 166,500 124,875 41,625 fourth quarter payment 6,650 6,650 _ . 160,000 - 160,000 waiting for invoice 5,000 - 5,000 future event 75,000 - 75,000 waiting for invoice 200,000 - 200,000 no contract to date 4,750 - 4,750 waiting for invoice 7,000 7,000 to be paid out in May 8 June 20,000 20,000 _ 40,000 13,350 26,650 paid out of fund 132 20,000 - 20,000 future event 55,000 - 55,000 future event 7,500 5,000 2,500 final payment 5,000 - 5,000 future event 1,400 - 1,400 future event 26,400 - 26,400 future event 5,000 - 5,000 payment processed 33,350 9,311 24,039 salary 35,000 - 35,000 on going 16,000 6,000 10,000 on going 1,166,996 400,047 766,949 GF yr to date 040527 _3 _ • MEMORANDUM' TO: Town Council FROM: Stan Zemler Greg Hall Susie Hervert SUBJ: Red Sandstone Multi-use Facility Over the past several years, attempts have been made to construct a multipurpose recreational facility in the Town of Vail (TOV). After the demolition of the old TOV Shops several sites were considered and Red Sandstone School was proposed. The proposed facility is a 8;742 square foot, free standing structure with an at grade entry. The uses are distributed as follows: Lower Level: The lower level, 5,570 square feet, has an entry foyer and reception desk to collect fees • and assist the public. There also includes a 1200 sq. ft. multi-purpose room to be used for dance, yoga, and other activities. ,Main Level: The main level will include administrative offices, restroom /changing rooms and a gymnastics area. Funding: The project has several funding partners. Including: $380,000 $150,000 $100, 000 $250,000 $150, 000 $65,000 Vail valley Water & Sewer Town of Vail Town of Vail (convert to cash) Vail Resorts Eagle County School District Eagle County School District (Parking Lot Improvements) Total $1,095,000 This project received PEC` approval in March 2004 and was presented to the Council shortly after. Council directed staff to move forward with design and bidding of the project. Council also expressed concerns as did the PEC about parking and traffic • management. Staff has been working with school staff and VRD to develop an IGA to address use of the building and parking issues. Bids for this ro'ect were o ened on Ma 20"' with Viele Construction bein low bidder • p J P Y 9 at $1,220,000 million. This creates a funding gap of about $500,000. In order to fund the approximate gap of $500,000 staff is proposing two possible approaches. Proposal to fund the project: 1. The Vail Recreation District has indicated a willingness to participate in funding the facility by committing $400,000. This proposal would involve the TOV making a loan to the VRD to be paid back at $40,000 per year for ten years. An additional fee of $500 would be charged, and committed to a building replacement fund to help offset the cost of major repairs. Or: The TOV makes up the funding gap, and charges VRD rent and monthly maintenance fees. 2. Town original commitment of~in kind be converted to a cash contribution. Staff Recommendation: • Staff recommends that this project move forward. To facilitate this occurrence, the following Council actions are proposed: 1. Approve the concept of a ten year loan with the VRD to total $400,000 paid back at a rate of $40,000 per year over a ten year period: An additional payment of $500 a month will be committed to a major maintenance fund. Give the Town Manager the authority to negotiate and enter into such an agreement. 2. 3. Authorize a total bud4et of $1.475.000 to be added to the Capital Projects Fund. $500,000 would be transferred from the Capital Fund balance with the remaining coming from other groiect contributors. This would still leave over $2,400,000 in the FY2004 ending Capital Fund Balance. 4. _ Authorize the commitment of up to $100.000 from the Capital Fund as a substitute for the originally proposed TOV in kind support. • AIPP REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS CONTENTS 1.. LETTER EXPLAINING THE PROJECT 2. PHOTO OF BUILDING 3. PROJECT BUDGET 4. LIST OF REQIRED MATERIALS AND SERVICES INDICATING DONATIONS 5. AIPP BUDGET 6. ELEVATIONS OF RENOVATED BUILDING. • TOWN OF SAIL • 1309 Elkhorn Drive Art in Public Places mail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2344 Fax: 970-479-2166 20 May, 2004 Judy Camp Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado Dear Judy One of Vail's few historic buildings is slowly deteriorating. The former dwelling dates from 1922 and was part of the Anholtr Ranch which was purchased by the town in the early 1970's. Until recently the building was used by the Vail Recreation District for sports equipment storage. For the last few years the Ford Park structure, which the Art iri Public Places (AIPP) program calls the "Art Shack", has featured boarded up windows or windows with broken glass, a padlocked door, and an interior floor that is unsafe to walk on: AIPP would like to restore the building, make it ADA accessible and open to the public. We would like to see it function as a place where the public can see an artist working, witness the creative process and understand more about art and how artists work. It could also be a venue for art exhibitions, lectures, and instruction and be available for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens to use for programs and classes. • In 2003 the town council gave AIPP permission to renovate the building and use it for cultural programs. Architects, planners and engineers all donated their time and a building permit was finally awarded by the town. .The consulting architect and former AIPP board member, Kyle Webb solicited donations from material suppliers. NEDBO construction donated laborers and the interior was stripped, tiles sent for asbestos testing and the initial demolition work begun. Honeywagon donated trash removal and the dumpster was quickly filled. Windows were purchased at cost thanks to the efforts of Kathy Langenwalter. After cleaning out the debris and removing drywall, the structure of the building was exposed. It was determined that the building's construction methods and materials will not meet safety codes. The foundation is rudimentary. NEDBO Construction prepared an estimate to restore the building and bring it up to code. AIPP funds and donations will not meet all of the costs to renovate the building. The estimate for the work including labor and materials is $140,000. AIPP has dedicated $30,000 from its 2004 budget for the project and donations of material and labor equal approximately $50,000. Unfortunately, the cost of materials has risen almost 30% since the estimate was prepared in January. Therefore we are requesting $78,000 from the Town of Vail to complete the renovations to this historic building. Yours sincerely, The Art in Public Places Board of Directors • ~~ RECYCLEDPAPER • ::,:_:: . • Nedbo Construction, Inc. Artist Shack @ Ford Park Takeoff Worksheet Job# 2357 to 2357 Takeoff V14orksheet 01 /21104 Extended Cost Code Description Unit Quantity Price Ex~ Price Bid Price Job: 2357 Bid Item: 1000 Div 1 -General Conditions 1000.000 Building Permit (100) 1200.000 Supervision -Nedbo Cosst. 1300.000 Design & Engineering Fees -Donations 1610.000 Interim Clean-up 1620.000 Final Clean-up. 1700.000 Trash Truck 1750.000 Landfill Fees 1900.000 Project Closeout 1995.000 Contractor's Fee Bid Item: 2000 I 2050.000 2050.000 2250.000 ,2290.000 2400.000 2900.000 liv 2 - Sitework Demolition ..Carpenter ..Laborer Trenching for Sewer, Water & Electrical Site Grading -Hand Labor Slab on Grade Prep inc. Structural Fill Landscaping Bid Item: 3000 Div 3 -Concrete 3300.000 Foundations Existing Repairs 3500.000 Slab-on-Grade Report 9-5-0-01 tom . • is 1.00 1,650.000000 1,650.00 1,650.00 mo 2.00 8;500.000000 17,000.00 17,000.00 hrs 60.00 35.000000 2,100.00 2,100.00 hrs 32.00 35.000000 1,120.OU 1,120.00 trps 2.00 300.000000 600.00 600.00 tns 8.00 55.000000 440.00 440.00 hrs 8.00 50.000000 400.00 400.00 10% 1.00 12,738.000000 12,738.00 12,738.00 Bid Item Total: 36,048.00 36,048.00 hrs 32.00 50.000000 1,600.00 1,600.00. hrs 80.00 35.000000 2,800.00 2,800.00 Is 1.00 2,500.000000 2,500.00 2,500.00 hrs 40.00 35.000000 1,400.00 l ,400.00 sf 420.00 3.000000 1,260.00 1,260.00 allow ~ 1.00 1,500.000000 1,500.00 1,500.00 Bid Item Total: 11,060.U0 11,060.00 allow 1.00 2,000.000000 2,000.00 2,000.00 sf 420.00 3.500000 1,470.00 1,470.00 ' 1 /2004 P ~ PM • • • Takeoff Worksheet Continued... 01/21/04 Cost Code Description Extended Unit Quantity Price Ext. Price Bid Price 3500.000 Concrete Staining sf 420.00 1.000000 420.00 420.00 Bid Item: 4000 Div 4 -Masonry Bid Item Total: 3,890.00 3,890.00 4210.000 patio Pavers sf 200.00 8.000000 1,600.00 1,600.00 Bid Item: 6000 . Div 6 -Woods Bid Item Total: 1,600.00 1,600.00 6100.000 Rough Carpentry ~.s 6110.000 Rough Framing Material Is 240.00 50.000000 12,000.00 12,000.00 6150.000 Exterior Trim & Siding ~s 1.00 10,000.000000 10,000.00 10,000.00 6150.000 ..Siding sf 120.00 50.000000 ~ 6,000.00 6,000.00 6150.000 ..1x6 Exterior Trim If 750.00 6.500000 4,875.00 4,875.00 6150.000 Trellis Cedar Material allow 300.00 15.000000 4,500.00 4,500.00 6175.000 Backing & Blocking hrs 1.00 500.000000 500.00 500.00 6210.000 Interior Plywood for Walls 4.00 50.000000 200.00 200.00 6200.000 Install Interior Plywood ea hrs 30.00 20.000000 600.00 600.00 6200.000 Finish Carpentry hrs 48.00 50.000000 2,400.00 2,400.00 6210.000 Finish Materials is 60.00 50.000000 3,000.00 3,000.00 6210.000 Case if 1.00 1,000.000000 1,000.00 1,000.00 6200.000 ..Installation ~ if 100.00 2.500000 250.00 250.00 ' 6210.000 •Base If 100.00 2.000000 200.00 200,00 6200.000 ..Installation if 80.00 2.500000 200.00 200.00 80.00 1.500000 120.00 120.00 Bid Item: 7000 Div 7 - ThermaUMoisture Prote Bid Item Total: 45,845.00 45,845.00 7100.000 Waterproof Membrane for Roof sf 7100.000 Tyvek Exterior Moisture Barrier sf 700.00 5.000000 3,500.00 3,500.00 7100.000 3 Mil Interior Vapor Barrier sf 600.00 1.500000 900.00 900.00 7200.000 Insulation -Ceiling sf 1,240.00 1.000000 1,240.00 1,240.00 7200.000 Insulation -Walls sf 600.00 2.500000 1,500.00 1,500.00 7310.000 Roofing Shingles sf 640.00 2.000000 1,280.00 1,280.00 7310.000 Siding Shingles sf 700.00 8.000000 5,600.00 5,600.00 100.00 8.000000 800.00 800.00 Report 9-5-0-01 tom Page 2 01/21/2004 03:30 PM Takeoff Worksheet Continued... 01/21/04 ~ Cost Code Description Bid Item: 8000 Div 8 -Doors & Windows 8200.000 Exterior French Wood Doors 8600.000 „Hanging 8600.000 Wood Windows - Eagl at cost 8600.000 ..Installation 8700.000 Exterior Door Hardware 8700.000 .,Installation Bid Item: 9000 Div 9 -Finishes 9250.000 Gypsum Drywall Ceiling Painting 9900.000 ,.Interior 9900.000 ..Exterior Bid Item: 15000 Div 15 -Plumbing & Mechanica 15400.000 plumbing, Water & Sewer Bid Item: 16000 Div 16 - Electrical 16400.000 Main Electrical Service 16500.000 Electrical Unit ea allow ea bid hrs ea ea sf sf is allow is allow Extended Quantity Price Bid Item Total: 1.00 2,000.000000 1.00 200.000000 1.00 2,000.000000 24.00 50.000000 1.00 150.000000 1.00 100.000000 Bid Item Total: 600.00 3.500000 420.00 5.000000 1.00 2,000.000000 Bid Item Totai: 1.00 5,000.000000 Bid Item Total: 1.00 2,500.000000 1.00 7,500.000000 Exx Price Bid Price 14,820.00 14,820.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 200.00 200.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 150.00 150.00 100.OQ 100.00 5,650.00 5,650.00 2,100.00 2,100.00 2, l 00.00 2,100.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 S,000.OU 5,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 Bid Item Total: Grand Total: 10,000.00 10,000.00 140,113.00 140,113.00 Report 9-5- - /2004 tom ~ Pa~of 3 ~ PM 11.16.1003 • • ~r :~ .. ,..~`~ C,rs' • Town of Vail, Art in Public Places Art Shack Renovation: Donations/Pledges Ford Park Vail, Colorado - . ~ADSIt~llg (~ Architecture: KH. Webb Architects Structural Engineering: MJ Mueller Approvals: Braun and Associates fonstruction: Nedbo Conswction M~erial List Trash Removal: Honeywagon Supervision: Nedbo Construction General Demolition Nedbo Construction Signage/Donation Plaque AIPP Board Minor Nand Exavation work Sand Pledged by Shane's Mountain Masonry Brick Pavers +/-200 sq. ft. a8/sf Pledged by Shane's Mountain Masonry Misc ground covers/shrubs/topsoil Pledged. by Greg Barrie @ TOY Concrete/Gravel for new interior slab 420sf Pledged by Gallegos Masonry Foundation Patch and Repair Pledged by Gallegos Masonry Wood lf~x Particle Board Plywood for walls 24 sheets Interior Woad Trim for windows/doors IOOIf Cedar Shingles for Root/Gables BOOsf Pledged by Plath Roofing Rough Sawn Cedaz irim.2x6's 3001( 4" Cedar lap Siding TSOsf 2x4 Framing lumber 80 8' 8 x 12 RS Ridge Beam 28 L.F. 2 x 10 Roof Joists 44 12' 1x4 Ceiling Strips 120 14' Rough Sawn fedaz Timbers for Trellis 12 2x8x10' 2 4x4x8' Misc Framing fonnectors Misc Fasteners 5/B" Plywood for Wall Sheathing 36sheets '/~" Plywood for Roof Repairs 14sheets 36 2x8x10 / 18 2x8x16' for roof rafters & bottom cords do red DOOr hems New Windows to Match Existing: Eagle Windows: Already Arrived and paid for at discount 6 double hung I triple mull I fixed for gable New French Doors 160x68 Lockset I ea 910.477.2990 y%~~x;. .~ :;t=~ www.kbwebb ram 1.11.2003 Town of Vail, Art in Public Places Art Shack Renovation: Donations/Pledges Ford Park Vail, Colorado Consulting Lisp Architecture: KN. Webb Architects Struaural Engineering. MJ Mueller Approvals: Braun and Assoaates Construction: Nedbo Construction Material list: General Conditions: Trash Removal: Honeywagon Supervision: Nedbo Conswction General Demolition Signage/Donation Plaque AIPP Board Sitework Items: Minor Hand Excavation work Sand Brick Pavers +/-200 sq. ft. $8/sf Misc. ground covers/shrubs/topsoil Pledged by Greg Barrie ~ TOY Concrete Items: Concrete/Gravel for new interior slab 420sf Foundation Patch and Repair Wood Items: Partide Board Plywood for walls 24 sheen Interior Wood Trim for windows/doors IOOIf Cedar shingles for Roof/Gables 800sf Rough Sawn Cedar Trim 2x6's 3001( 4" Cedar lap Siding 750s( 2x4 Framing Lumher 30 8' Rough Sawn Cedar Timbers (or Trellis 12 2x8x10' 2 4x4x8' Misc Framing Connectors Misc Fasteners '/~" Plywood for Roof Repairs 24sheets 36 2x8x 10 / 18 2x8x 16' for roof rafters & bottom cords Windows and Door Items: New Windows to Match Existing: Eagle Windows (At Cost per Kathy langenwalter) 6 double hung I triple mull I fixed for gable New French Doors 160x68 lockset I ea . Water & Weatherproofing_Items: Waterproof Membrane (or Roof 600sf R-19 Fiberglass Batt Insulation for Walls/Root 600sf root S40sf walls Tyvek Exterior Moisture Barrier 1 roll • r • • • .-:.~ .. ~~ ,~ • .-:~: Waterproof Membrane for Root 600sf Pledged by Platte Roofing R-19 Fiberglass Batt Insulation for Walls/Roof 600sf roof 540s( walls Tyvek Exterior Moisture Barrier I roll 3 mil. Interior Yapor Barrier 540sf Metal Flashing.- - -Pledged by Platte Roofing_ ~ ~ -~ 30# Asphaltic Felt Paper I roll Ft~ee ~ ~oa~ Concrete Color Staining 420sf Pledged by Gallegos Masonry Exterior Stain IO gal Paint for wndows/Trim 2 ~ Sealer for Plywood Interior Walls 5 gal Gypsum Board for Ceiling 600st New Electrical 200 amp Service Panel TOY Staff Electricians Interior/Exterior Oudets Track or fable lighting & Fixtures Exterior light Fixtures Smoke 8 Heat Detection System Phone Service Electric Oil-Filled Baseboard Neaten ;50 a LF. Pledged by Nedbo Exterior Hose Bib i0Y Staff ' Rough-in for future sink 470.417.2994 ?,. ......9:, www.kb+wedb.rvm AIPP BUDGET 2004 • REVENUE RETT and operating fund 133,496 . Manhole income 20,000* Roll forward from 2003 34,213(confirmed 3/25/04) Fundraising Commissions ' Total available funds for 2004 187,214 EXPENSES Salaries salaries 31,356 benefits 11,915 Maintenance 9,000 Exuberance Bird of Paradise Seibert Circle Temporary Exhibition Program 5,000 • Brochure and printing Graphic design Artist expenses Event or reception Projects *Village Streetscape (Wall Street) 50,000 *Pedestrian Bridge(autumn 2004) 25,000 Trash cans 1,000 Ford Park Art Shack ~ 30,000 Pirate Ship Park (Ty Gillespie design fee) 2,500 *Seibert Circle Design Study 10,000 East Meadow Drive (design and research fee) 2,500 Summer program (to be decided) 250 Front Door Project not funded Checkpoint Charlie design not funded Contingency 7753 Administration 1000 TOTAL 187,214 • COIORBOARD~ ROOF & SIDIN OLYMPIC - SE NSPARENT STAIN #920 sl ~ kfF:S m~~ ~Y V ~l~` ~.~ ,. ~ ~~ 2 r-R'~Za,~ 4 i °, ~ ~ ' 1 ' ~~,~ TRIM & TRELLIS ~ •~ ~+~ ~ F~ . ~. ~.~~,r~ OLYMPIC -SEMI-TRAN5PARENT STAIN #723 ~f: -_ ~-~. REMOVE EXIST VENT & INSTALL NEW FIXED UVDW NEW WD TRELLIS CENTER PRIMARY HORIZ SUPPORTS ON EXIST WD BAND AT BLDG - PATCH & REPAIR EXIST WD SIDING 6 TRIM \t f .r ~.... Proposed South Elevation .' II t C ~' y~y 6 ~0 NEW WD ~ -a SHINGLES TO ~ a~ MATCH EXISTING i ~ i---NEW EXT LIGHT FIXTURES - ~ - OLD CALIFORNIA LANTERN ' COMPANY, "SLITTER'S MILL" ~ .~ # 2-370-TB-FR --REMOVE EXIST WDW & i INSTALL NEW FRENCH DOORSi ~ ` ~ ^-~"MODIFY SITE FOR MAX 1:12 ~ ~ ,' ~{. S OPE AWAY FROM BLDG ~~. -PREVIOUS CONTOUR SHOWN DASHED NEW WD I. i I ; SHINGLE ROOF x Q TO MATCH I N ~~ EXISTING I N ~~ ;? C C I --~-5 P I _. I _ ~ ~-NEW WD SIDING ~~ 11 °ilf 1: 1)11 I °uw~ n u - 6 TRIM TO I °"'` """ ~{ MATCH EXISTING ""10"' 'ilfpeyf 3:i(I .. ; APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING • GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS All applications must be submitted to the Town of Vail by Wed. July 31, 2002 by 5:00 P.M.. You must provide 12 copies of.the application. Any application received after that date or any application packet with fewer. than 11 copies will not be considered. Please send application to: Town of Vail Penny Harpe, Accounting Tech. 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 For questions on the financial statements, please contact Penny Harpe at 479-2104. PLEASE TYPE THIS APPLICATION OR PRINT IN BLACK INK Name of organization: Vail Valley Community Television, Channel s 2• Contact person: Brian Hall 3• ~ Mailing address: P.O. Box 5600, Avon, CO 81658 • 4• Telephone: 970-926-5855 5• Members and Titles of your governing board: Brian Hall/President, Michael Billingsly/Vice President, Kaylee Brennand/Sect-Treasurer, Mike Brown/Town of Avon Rep, Kim Ruotolo/Town of Vail Rep, John Dakin/Community Rep, Annah Scully/Community Rep 6• Amount of contribution requested: $10,000.00 7• Organization fiscal year-end: December 31 8. Are your books audited? No 9• How will the contribution be used? Equipment Upgrades and Replacement 10. How does your request support item 1C of the contribution policy? New and upgraded equipment will increase the quality of the programming at Channel 5, Vail's community access station. 11. Who currently funds your organization (other governments, private donations, user fees, etc.)? Towns of Avon, Vail, and Mintum, in the form of a percentage of franchise fees paid to the towns by Comcast; Program Sponsorships, Program Fees. • 12. Organization's mission statement: Vail Valley Community Television exists to inform the citizens of, foster debate within, and promote the community of Eagle County Colorado. APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING Balance Sheet tractions: Round all fi es to the nearest dollar. Please resent in as much detail as possible. • Ins gm' P Most Recent Completed Fiscal Year (Date: ) Assets: $ SEE ATTACHED Total Assets $ • Liabilities: $ Total Liabilities ~ Net Worth (Total Assets Minus Total Liabilities) $ • • • • ~:4a Pnn Vail Valley Community Television-Channel 5 05/20/04 Balance Sheet accrual Basis As of December 31, 2003 ASSETS Current Assets Checking/Savings Checking Money Market/no transfer Savings/transfer ok Total Checking/Savings Accounts Receivable Accounrts Receivable Total Accounts Receivable Other Current Assets Payroll Deposit Total Other Current Assets Dec 31, 03 ~~~ 3,973.20 12,437.80 3,875.12 ~~~ 20,286.12 2,792.36 .~_ 2,792.36 -582.49 ~~ -582.49 Total Current Assets Fixed Assets A/D -Equipment A/D -Leasehold Improvements Equipment Studio ~ Leasehold Improvements Total Fixed Assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES ~ EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Total Accounts Payable Other Current Liabilities Payroll Liabilities Total Other Current Liabilities Total Current Liabilities Total Liabilities Equity Opening• Bal Equity Operating Fund Retained Earnings Working Capital Fund Net Income Total Equity TOTAL LIABILITIES ~ EQUITY 22,495.99 -132;510.04 -10,628.30 141,961.48 10,628.30 9,451.44 31,947.43 30.00 ~~ 30.00 1,470.21 ~~ 1,470.21 1,500.21 1,500.21 -4,232.27 -7,013.21 36,519.13 25,000.00 -19,826.43 30,447.22 ~~ 31,947.43 Page 1 of 1 APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING • Statement of Sources and Uses Instructions: Round all figures to the nearest dollar. Please present as much detail as possible. Current Fiscal Year Budget Revenues: $ SEE ATTACHED (List by funding source) • Total Revenue ~ Expenses: $ Total Expenses ~ Total Revenue Minus Expense $ • r° ~ 2:os PM Vail Valley Community Television-Channel 5 05/20/04 Profit ~ Loss Budget accrual Basis January through December 2004 • Ordinary IncomelExpense Income Capitol Improvement Grant Contributions Income Dubs Franchise Fees Avon Mintum Unincorporated Vail Total Franchise Fees Production Services Program Fees Program Sponsorships Uncategorized Income Total Income • Expense Advertising Automobile Expense Bank Service Charges Capital Improvements Dues and Subscriptions Equipment Purchase Insurance Licenses and Permits Payroll Expenses Postage and Delivery Professional Fees Program Expense Rent Repairs Salary Sr Wages Supplies Telephone Travel 8 Ent Utilities/Common Costs Total Expense Net Ordinary Income • Net Income Budget ~~~ 10, 000.00 1,800.00 18,000.00 2,500.00 25,000.00 50,000.00 95,500.00 10,000.00 1,500.00 25,000.00 143~80~ 0 600.00 600.00 72.00 9,600.00 300.00 20,000.00 3,000.00 100.00 6,000.00 600.00 425.00 450.00 16,653.00 1,200.00 69,000.00 3,000.00 3, 000.00 1,200.00 8,000.00 143,800.00 ~~ 0.00 Page 1 of 1 ~~ . , ._,.~ APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING • GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS All applications must be submitted to the Town ofVail by Wed. July 3I, 2002 by 5:00 P.M.. You must provide 12 copies of the application. Any application received after that date or any application packet with fewer than 11 copies will not be considered. Please send application to: Town of Vail Penny Harpe, Accounting Tech. 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 For questions on the financial statements, please contact Penny Harpe at 479-2104. PLEASE TYPE THIS APPLICATION OR PRINT IN BLACK INK Name of organization: Vail Valley Chamber & Tourism Bureau 2. Contact person: Katie Barnes 3. Mailing address: 100 E. Meadow Drive, Suite 34, Vail CO 81657 • 4. Telephone: 970-479-1046 x101 5. Members and Titles of your governing board: Steve Pope- Chairman -Publisher Vail Daily Brian Nolan- Vice Chairman -Owner The Blue Moose Stan Cope- Secretary/ Treasurer -President -Lodge Tower Bill Anderson -General Manager -Lion Square Lodge Mike Brown -Avon Town Council Scott Fulton -Avon Business Association Tim Cochrane -Executive Director -Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce Peggy Curry -Colorado Mountain College Robert Dallain -General Manager -Park Hyatt Beaver Creek Jim Feldhaus - VP Sales & Marketing -Colorado Mountain Express John Garnsey -Chief Operating Officer -Beaver Creek Ghiqui Hoffman -Laughing Monkey -Vail Chamber Business Association Alan Holub - Minturn Business Association Bill Jensen - Sr. VP & COO -Vail Resorts Kent Logan -Vail Town Council Arn Menconi -Eagle County Commissioner Tony O'Rourke -Beaver Creek Resort Company Tom Backhus -Owner - 4 Eagle Ranch Sue Marquez -Edwards Business Association Beth Slifer -Owner -Slifer Designs • Joel Heath -President -Untraditional Marketing 6. Amount of contribution requested: 34 Blue Parking Passes 7. ~ Organization fiscal year-end: December 31, 2004 ~l h ~` E 1 3, Are your books audited? Yes - • 9, How will the contribution be used? Twenty five parking passes will be used to continue_the Community Host Program through the summer of 2004 and the winter season of 2004/2005. Nine pass2s0~ ommunity Host swill work 80 hours (32 hours the construction penod of Fall during the summer/fall and 48 hours in the winter) and will receive a Blue Parking Pass or Vail/Beaver Creek Ski Pa ccommodate thisn The VVCTB will administer the passes for ski passes in order to a program, which includes hiring, and training the Hosts. 10. How does your request support item 1C of the contribution policy? The Community Host Program supports the TOV's mission of being the premier mountain resort by increasing the level of customer service throughout the town by offering friendly, knowledgeable information to our guests and creating a seamless customer experience from the streets of Vail to the ski mountain. 11. Who currently funds your organization (other governments, private donations, user fees, etc.)? Membership dues and programs, commissions, co-op marketing programs and publications, contributions and contracts for services fund the VVCTB. • 12. Organization's mission statement: The VVCTB's mission is to improve the conditions for business success. We do this by being THE organization dedicated to leading the economic vitality of the community by: a. Setting new standards for regional cooperation and collaboration among our stakeholders, including area businesses, government entities and private organizations. b. Attracting and retaining customers c. Partnering with area businesses to enhance their level of success. We effectively operate through self-sustaining business and marketing programs and financial partnerships with our valued stakeholders. (If more room is needed to answer questions, please use the back of this page.) ~\ APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING Balance Sheet -Instructions: Round all fi es to the nearest dollar. Please resent in as much detail as ossible. gur p P Most Recent Completed Fiscal Year (Date: 12/31/2003 ) Assets: Cash in banks -operating 146,111 Cash in banks -restricted 141,827 Accounts Receivable 239,516 Inventory 0 Prepaid Expenses 1,260 Total Current Assets $528,714 Property and Equipment: Software and website costs 24,029 Furniture and equipment 317,932 Leasehold improvements 52,113 Less accumulated depreciation 309 52 Total Property and Equipment 84 547 • Total Assets $613,261 Liabilities: Accounts Payable 278,592 Line of credit payable 70,000 Advance deposits and related liabilities 81,004 Accrued payroll and payroll tax liabilities 46,818 Deferred revenue 228,433 Total Current Liabilities 704 847 Total Liabilities $704,847 Net Worth (Total Assets Minus Total Liabilities) $(91,586) • ~' ~~~, • APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING Statement of Sources and Uses nd all figures to the nearest dollar. Please present as much detail as R ou Instructions: possible. Current Fiscal Year Budget Revenues: Commissions 446,436 Contributions 75'000 Sponsorships 35,000 TOV Contract (Visitor Center) 162,375 Co-ops, advertising and guides 678,500 Membership dues 547,345 Handling and inspection fees 150,900 LMD admire fee 105,000 BC Marketing fund 244,848 Partner Programs 130,230 Merchandise and concession sales 25,986 Interest income 1,380 • 203 61 Other revenues , 664,203 $ 2 Total Revenue , Expenses: Personnel and related taxes 1,491,487 Co-op & guide expense 435,500 BC Marketing expense 187,848 Partner Program expense 77,050 Advertising, web, newsletters 67,743 Rent, utilities, equipment 76,055 Depreciation 34,011 Postage, phone, leased equipment 86,065 Professional fees 12,700 Operating supplies 19,360 Credit card fees & Res system 45,718 Property and sales taxes 3,575 Miscellaneous 49,387 Insurance 7'802 Travel & Entertainment 24,100 Total Expenses $ 2,618,401 Total Revenue Minus Expense $ 45,802 • O,,~ice of the Town 1~Ianager 75 South Frontage Road Yaif; Colorado 81657 970-479-21OS/Faz 97U-479-2157 Katie Barnes Director of Visitor Services Vail Valley Chamber & Tourism Bureau 100 E. Meadow Dr., Suite 34 Vail, CO 81657 Katie, Thank you for making arrangements on such short notice to staff the community host slots during the initial stages of the town's Village Streetscape construction. While we had hoped to staff the positions through an extension of the WCTB community host volunteers, we believe the public relations value of having paid hosts on hand during April and May has served the community well and reinforced our commitment to help set • the tone for other construction, projects over the next four years. Once the hosts have completed their work, please forward an invoice for this additional staffing, estimated at $8,678 for the period April 19 to June 17, to my attention at the town. In the meantime, now that we have a larger planning window for recruitment, we're hoping that an expansion of your volunteer host program will be established for the fall construction season in the Village, which runs Sept. 7 to Nov. 20. It is my understanding the Town Council will be considering your request for nine additional blue parking passes to facilitate this additional staffing as we conclude year-one of the streetscape construction. We will be recommending Council approval of the additional passes as an alternative to paying the hourly rate of $12.80, per the current arrangement. I look forward to continuing our partnership with you in evaluating future construction host needs for 2005 and beyond. rely, Information Officer cc: Vail Town Council • Stan Zemler Greg Hall Scott Bluhm ~~,• RECYCLEDPAPER May 26, 2004 ~` Yampah Builders Inc. 715 Grand Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-379-5222 fax 970-945-4092 ESZ'Il1~IATE FOR BUDGET PURPOSES ONLY May 26, 2004 Attn. John Gallegos Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 RE: A.D.A. Upgrades WE are pleased to submit a preliminary estimate for the Town of Vail and Vail Recreation District A.D.A. upgrades • Our estimate is based on the following documents: Deparnnent of Justice Written Report 'A.D.A. Manual of Acts and Relevant Regulations 1999 Edition We have walked through the facilities and are familiar with the proposed changes that are required. All areas should be revisited prior to construction to clarify ambiguities in the "Standards". A "Lump Sum" or "Cost plus" format is available. We will work with the Town of Vail Administration to find what is best for cost and schedule. NOTE, As of 6:00 P.M. 5/26/04, we have not received the "Standards" book from Mr. Brooks Singer, Dept. of Justice. This was to be Fed-Ex'd to us on 5/25/04 Our ESTIMATE for the Town of Vail Facilities upgrade is $ 116,822.00 Our ESTIMATE for the Vail Recreation District upgrade is $254,724.00 Respec s bmitted, ,;, V' 'Ray ward, Pres. Yampah Builders Inc. • °t • MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 1, 2004 SUBJECT: Proposed text amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, to amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulations in the Hillside Residential (HR), Single-Family Residential (SFR), Two- Family Residential (R), Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS), Residential Cluster (RC), Low Density Multiple-Family (LDMF), Medium Density Multiple-Family (MDMF), High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF), and Housing (H) districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vicki Pearson, et. al. Planner: Bill Gibson DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST First reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series. of 2004, an ordinance amending Title • 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, to amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulations in the Single-Family Residential (SFR), Two-Family Residential ' (R), and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) zone districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto. II. BACKGROUND Since the Town Council's last meeting the Town Staff has been further evaluating methods for deducting basements from the GRFA calculations. The Council had previously reviewed a graduated basement deduction methodology based upon the ratio of exposed/unexposed exterior surface wall areas. At the May 18, 2004, meeting of the Town Council determined that this methodology would- be too cumbersome to implement and directed Staff to prepare language for a graduated basement deduction based upon the linear distance of a building's perimeter that is exposed/unexposed. This language has been integrated into the attached Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004. As stated in previous memorandums, the Town Staff has concerns about the complexity of administering a graduated basement deduction policy. The Staff believes that a whole basement deduction policy more efficiently achieves the policy goal of "not counting basements as GRFA" (i.e. if a portion of a building meets the definition of a "basement" it is simply not included in the GRFA calculations). .Additionally, at the May 18, 2004, meeting the Town Council directed Staff to prepare an ordinance amending the GRFA regulations for only the Single-Family • Residential, Two-Family Residential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary c Residential Districts. The Council unanimously voiced its support for the general GRFA amendment policies being applied to the higher density residential districts, but expressed concerns about the unintended consequences of these amendments in multiple-family situations and expressed a desire to further 1 discuss these issues at a future meeting. DISCUSSION ITEMS The following is a summary of the Staffs analysis of the pro's and con's associated with the graduated and whole basement deduction methods: Graduated Basement Deduction Pro's • The GRFA deductions directly correlate to how much of a basement is located below-grade. • A graduated basement deduction allows for additional development potential, with that new potential theoretically being located below grade. • Numerous homes may be eligible for some form of a graduated basement deduction. Con's • A graduated basement deduction will require applicants to submit plans with additional and different information than is currently required by the Town (ex, topographic land surveys, floor plans with overlays of FFE above, floor plans with overlays of topographic information, cross-section drawings, floor plans with overlays of reflected ceiling elevations, etc.) • A graduated basement deduction will be very difficult to administer, will slow the Town's review process, may create decreased customer service, and may create the need for additional staff resources. • A graduated basement deduction will be very difficult to enforce. • A graduated basement deduction does not close the crawlspace loop-holes of the current GRFA regulations. • A graduated basement deduction method creates an incentive to build excess crawlspaces for future illegal conversions~to GRFA. • Other GRFA deductions (ex. crawlspaces and garages) in the basement will mean the graduated basement deduction percentage will not reflect the actual floor area being deducted. • Any landscaping that affects site grading will require extensive Town review to ensure compliance with the GRFA calculations. • Topographic Improvement Location Certificates prepared by a licensed land surveyor will be required for all new construction, all landscaping, and most remodels. • A graduated basement deduction does not "keep the Town out of the inside of people's homes". The floor area uses within a basement will continue to be closely regulated by the Town (ex. crawlspace converted to livable space). • A graduated basement deduction will create. a significant margin of error in the GRFA calculations, in the 10's to 100's'of square feet for a residence, because of the margins of error associated with interpolating (i.e. estimating) grades and the margins of error associated with the standard 2 foot contours of a topographic land survey when calculating an exact deduction ratio (ex. a 2% • C~ 2 • change in the graduated basement deduction on a 25,000 sq. ft. Primary/Secondary lot could create a 100 sq. ft. difference in the GRFA calculations).... This margin of -error will affect all graduated basement deductions. • A graduated basement deduction may create justification for a GRFA variance based upon the unique physical characteristics of a lot (i.e. water table, bedrock, slopes, etc.). • A graduated basement deduction creates an incentive for applicants to over excavate a site to creating more below-grade structure so as to capture more GRFA. • A graduated basement deduction may create controversy over the distribution of GRFA between attached dwelling units (ex. dividing the deduction between duplex owners when one unit is proportionally more below-grade than the other). • A graduated basement deduction for only one level of a building will prevent an applicant from creating a new lower basement level, since the existing basement level will then no longer include a GRFA deduction. • Graduated basement deductions may be granted for small amounts of below-grade floor area (ex. 1 %, 5%, 9% etc.) which do not meet the policy intent of "not counting basements" as GRFA. Whole Basement Deduction • Pro's • A whole basement deduction will allow for additional development potential, with that new potential theoretically being located below grade. • The "basement" definition of a whole basement deduction will be similar to the building code requirements for determining a building story. • Fewer homes may be eligible for a whole basement deduction than the graduated basement deduction; however, the deduction will only be granted for true basements, thus meeting the intent of the policy. • A whole basement deduction will close the "above-grade" crawlspace loop-hole of the current GRFA regulations. • A whole basement deduction method will not create an incentive to build excess crawlspaces for future illegal conversions to GRFA. • A whole basement deduction will be much easier to enforce than a graduated basement deduction. • A whole basement deduction will "keep the Town out of the inside of people's homes". Changes to the floor area uses within a basement will not be reviewed for GRFA compliance by the Town (ex. crawlspace being converted to livable space). • A whole basement deduction will only create a small margin of • ~ error in the GRFA calculations due to interpolation (i.e. estimating) of grades and the margins of error associated with the standard 2 foot contours of a topographic land survey. These margins of error will only affect those buildings on the edge of the 3 basement/not a basement determination. • Con's o • ~ A graduated basement deduction will require applicants to submit plans with additional and different information than is currently required by the Town (ex. topographic land surveys, floor plans with overlays of FFE above, floor plans with overlays of topographic information, cross-section drawings, floor plans with overlays of reflected ceiling elevations, etc.) • A whole basement deduction policy will be difficult to administer; but to a lesser degree than a graduated basement deduction policy. • Landscaping that affects site grading may require Town review to ensure compliance with the GRFA calculations; but to a lesser degree than a graduated basement deduction policy. • Topographic Improvement Location Certificates prepared by a licensed land surveyor will be required for some new construction, landscaping, and remodels; but far fewer than will be required for a graduated basement deduction policy. • If a building code type basement definition is used, multiple levels of a home may be eligible for a whole basement deduction. • A whole basement deduction may create justification for a GRFA variance based upon the unique physical characteristics of a lot (i.e. water table, bedrock, slopes, etc:). • A whole basement deduction creates an incentive for applicants to • over excavate a site to creating more below-grade structure, but only to the degree where compliance with the "basement" definition is met. • A whole basement deduction 'may create controversy over the distribution of GRFA between attached dwelling units (ex. dividing the deduction between duplex owners); but to a far lesser extent than a graduated basement deduction since the Town will not be regulating the floor uses of basements (ex. converting a crawlspace to livable area). IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council approves, with modifications, Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, on first reading to amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulations in the Single-Family Residential (SFR), Two-Family Residential (R), and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, on first reading, the Community Development Department also recommends the Town Council makes the following findings: !~ 1. That the amendment is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail • Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and 4 • 2. That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the Zoning Regulations; and 3. That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, on first reading, the Community Development Department .recommends the following modification: 1. The graduated basement deduction language found in Section 8 of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, be substituted with a whole basement deduction policy as follows: ...except the horizontal areas of a structure as set forth herein shall then be deducted from the calculation of GRFA: f. Basements: that floor level of a structure where the. finished floor elevation of the level above is both: • 1. Not more than 6 feet above the lesser of the adjacent existing, finished, or interpolated grades for more than 50 percent of the structure perimeter. 2. Not more than 12 feet above the lesser of the adjacent existing, finished, or interpolated grades at any point along the structure perimeter. V. ATTACHMENTS Attachment B: Attachment A: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 • 5 2. That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the • Zoning Regulations; and 3. That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, on first reading, the Community Development Department recommends the following modification: 1. The graduated basement deduction language found in Section 8 of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, be substituted with a whole basement deduction policy as follows: ...except the horizontal areas of a structure as set forth herein shall then be deducted from the calculation of GRFA: f. Basements: that floor level of a sfructure where the finished floor elevation of the level above is both: 1. Not more than 6 feet above the lesser of the adjacent existing, finished, or interpolated grades for more than 50 percent of the structure perimeter. 2. Not more than 72 feet above the lesser of the adjacent existing, finished, or interpolated grades at any point along the structure perimeter. V. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Example Basement Deduction Methods Attachment B: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 • 5 Attachment: A • GRADUATED BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES • F E deduction: p ~ Floor Plan • deduction: / Ob 9; ~2~ •-•• Floor Plan ~Z• ~Z~ [p~ • E GRADUATED BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES ~Z~ deduction: N 3 9 ~2~ H Floor Plan H ~2• LZ~ deduction:~•3 q 6/d 1 L1 f-~ Floor Plan cZi • • • WHOLE BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES s6' to FFE for >50%: yes_ no_ _<12' any point: yes ~ no_ basement deduction: yeses no_ • E f t 6' Floor Plan 6~ sb' ~ G' s6' to FFE for a50%: yes_ no / s12' any point: yes no_ basement deduction: yes_ no r E Floor Plan • E E WHOLE BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES S~~ t-- ~--~ t (o~ 56' to FFE for ?50%: yes / no_ <_12' any point: yes_ no basement deduction: yes_ no~ s~' (mob Floor Plan ~S ~~ <_6' to FFE for ?50%: yes_ no~ _<12' any point: yes_ no~ basement deduction: yes_ no~ ~' 6 Floor Plan • r Attachment: B • ORDINANCE NO. 10 Series of 2004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12 (ZONING REGULATIONS), VAIL TOWN CODE, TO AMEND THE GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA) REGULATIONS IN THE SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR), TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R), AND TWO-FAMILY PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL (PS) ZONE DISTRICTS AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARDS THERETO. WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has held public hearings on the proposed amendments in accordance with the provisions of the Town Code of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds that the proposed amendments further the development objectives of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has recommended approval of this text amendment at its September 8, 2003, meeting, and has • submitted its recommendation to the Town Council• and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the amendments are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Vait Town Council finds that the amendments further the general and specific purposes of the zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the amendments promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. • Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF • VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Section 12-2-2 (Definitions) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows: (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#+sk~. Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) FLOOR AREA, GROSS RESIDENTIAL (GRFA): •, , snc~;,,,.~ , .,~ ~+o~ ,.,,a „+tie.- ~;.~,;~~~ ,.,~i~ f..,~tio~,. Refer to chapter 15 of this title for GRFA definitions, regulations, and requirements for GRFA calculation. SITE: See "Lot" SITE COVERAGE: The ratio of the. total building area of a site to the total area of a site, expressed as a percentage. For the purposes of this definition, "building area of a site" shall mean that portion of a site occupied by any building, carport, porte cochere, arcade, and • covered or roofed walkway constructed at, below, or above grade as measured from the exterior face of the perimeter walls or supporting columns. For the purposes of this definition, a balcony or deck projecting from a higher elevation may extend over a lower balcony, deck or walkway, and in such case the higher balcony or deck shall not be deemed a roof or covering for the lower balcony, deck or walkway. In addition to the above, building area shall also include any portion of a roof overhang, eaves, or covered stair, covered deck, covered porch, covered terrace or covered patio that extends more than four feet (4') from the exterior face of the perimeter building walls or supporting columns. Section 2. Section.12-66-8B (Single=Family Residential District, Density Control) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be repealed and amended with the following: (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as ~+r Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) B. Gross Residential Floor Area: 1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on • each site: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 2 • a. Not more than forty (40) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus b. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of ten thousand (10,000) square feet 3. No single-family residential lot except those located entirely in the red hazard avalanche zone or the flood plain shall be so restricted that it • cannot be occupied by one single-family dwelling. Section 3. Section 12-6C-8B (Two-Family Residential District, Density Control) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows: (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#isker~. Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) B. Gross Residential Floor Area: 1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on each site: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 3 r~ -' pGnvnvr~°. h~ mrlror) /1 rl(1\ qrn i.+ro fovi of cifo •+rn~ in nvroce nf_fhirht ~ i ~ s a. Not more than forfy six (46) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first ten thousand (10,000) square feet of site area; plus b. Thirty eighi(38) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over ten thousand (10,000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of site area; plus c. Thirteen(13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, not exceeding thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of site area; plus d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet. • dw~ing--~+e+~ Section 4. Section 12-6D-8 (Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District Density Control) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows: (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as st~+sken. Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) B. Gross Residential Floor Area: 1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on each site: F~ Ton /'1(11 cniroro foof of nrnecso~ii-lonfi~+l flnnr r+ro~ /(=C?C41 fnr • . / `1 ~ ~ ~ p~n~TG h~ inrlrni-I /1(1(11 cn~ i'+ro fool of ciao ~ro~ nvor fiftoon Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 4 a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus b. Thirty eight(38) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over ten thousand (10,000) square feed not exceeding fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of site area; plus c. Thirteen(13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feed not exceeding thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of site area; plus d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet. e. The secondary unit shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the allowable GRFA. Section 5. Section 12-10-10B (Parking Requirement, Schedule B) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows: (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#~isker~. Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) Use Parking Requirement 9v~efliag-~+t le: s: 1.5 sPaees$eF-u~ • Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 cJ • Single-Family and /f the unit's gross residential floor area is Two- Two-Family Structures less than 2,000 square feet: 2 spaces per unit (including EHUs) If the unit's gross residential floor area is 2,000 square feet or more, but less than 4,000 square feet: 3 spaces per unit If the unit's gross residential floor area is 4,000 square feet or more, but less than 5,500 square feet: 4 spaces per unit If the unit's gross residential floor area is 5,500 square feet or more: 5 spaces per unit Multiple-Family and If the unit's gross residential floorarea and Mixed- Mixed-Use is 500 square feet or less: 1.5 spaces per unit Structures (including EHUs) If the unit's gross residential floor area is more than 500 square, but less than 2,000 square feet: 2 spaces per unit !f the unit's gross residential floor area is 2,000 square feet or more: 2.5 spaces per unit Section 6. Section 12-13-4 (EHU Requirements by Type) of the-Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows: (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as strisl~er~. Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) EHU Additional GRFA Type I The EHU is entitled to an additional ~ 550 sq. ft. Type II The EHU is entitled to an additional ~ 550 sq. ft • Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 6 Section 7. Section 12-15-2 (GRFA REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE DISTRICT) of the • Vail Town Code shall be repealed and hereby re-enacted as follows: Zone Districts GRFA Ratio GRFA Credits (Added to results of application of percentage Hillside Residential .20 of site x21,780 sq. ft., plus 425 sq. ft. per allowable dwelling unit (HR) .05 of site area >21,780 sq. ft. Single-Family .40 of site area x10,000 sq. ft., plus None Residential (SFR) .13 of site area >10,000 sq. ft. Two-Family .46 of site area <_10,000 sq. ft., plus None Residential (R) .38 of site area >10,000 and <_15,000 sq. ft., plus .13 of site area >15,000 and 530,000 sq. ft., plus .06 of site area >30,000 sq. ft. Two-Family .46 of site area <_10,000 sq. ft., plus None Primary/Secondary .38 of site area >10,000 and <_15,000 sq. ft., (P/S) Residential plus .13 of site area >15,000 and _<30,000 sq. ft., plus .06 of site area >30,000 sq. ft. (the secondary unit shall not exceed 40% of the allowable GRFA) Residential Cluster .25 of buildable area 225 sq.ft. for single-family and two-family (RC) structures only Low Density Multiple .30 of buildable area 225 sq.ft. for single-family and two-family Family (LDMF) structures only Medium Density .35 of buildable area 225 sq.ft. for single-family and two-family Multiple-Family structures only (MDMF) High Density .60 of buildable area None Multiple-Family (HDMF) Housing (H) Per Planning and Environmental Commission None approval Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 7 Public .80 of buildable area None Accommodation . _.. (PA) Commercial Core 1 .80 of buildable area None (CC1) Commercial Core 2 .80 of buildable area None (CC2) Commercial Core 3 .30 of buildable area None (CC3) Commercial Service .40 of buildable area None Center (CSC) (GRFA shall not exceed 50% of the total building floor area on an site Arterial Business .60 of buildable area None (ABD) Heavy Service (HS) None permitted None Lionshead Mixed 2.5 of buildable area None Use 1 (LMU-1) 2.5 of buildable area Lionshead Mixed None Use 2 (LMU-2) Agriculture and 2,000 square feet None Open Space (A) Outdoor Recreation None permitted None (OR) Parking (P) None permitted None General Use (GU) Per Planning and Environmental Commission None approval Natural Area None permitted None Preservation (NAP) • • Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 Ski Base/Recreation Per Town Council approval None (SBR) Special Per underlying zoning or per development plan None Development approval by Town Council Districts (SDD) Ski Base/Recreation Per Planning and Environmental Commission None 2 (SBR2) approval Section 8. Section 12-15-3 (GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA; DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND EXCLUSION) of the Vail Town Code shall be repealed and hereby re- enacted as follows: A. Within the Single-Family Residential, Two-Family Residential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Districts: 1. Definition, Calculation and Deductions: • Gross Residential FloorArea Defined: For residential uses, the total square • footage of all horizontal areas on all levels of a structure, as measured to the outside face of the sheathing of the exterior walls (i.e., not including exterior wall finishes). Floor area shall include, but not be limited to, elevator shafts and stairwells at each level, lofts, fireplaces, bay windows, mechanical spaces, vents and chases, storage areas, and other similar areas. Garages; attics; vaulted or open to below spaces; basements; crawlspaces; and roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces, or patios shall be included as floor area; except the horizontal areas of a structure as set forth herein shall then be deducted from the calculation of GRFA: a. Enclosed garage areas of up to three hundred (300) square feet per vehicle space not exceeding a maximum of two (2) vehicle parking spaces for each allowable dwelling unit permitted by this title. Garage area deducted from floor area is awarded on a "per space basis" and shall be contiguous to a vehicular parking space. Each vehicular parking space shall be designed with direct and unobstructed vehicular access. Alcoves, storage areas, and mechanical areas which are located in a garage and which are twenty five percent (25%) or more open to the garage area may be included in the garage area deduction. • Interior walls separating the garage from other areas of a structure may be included in the garage area deduction. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 9 b. Attic areas with a ceiling height of five feet (5') or less, as measured from the top side of the structural members of the floor to the underside of the structural members of the roof directly above. c. Attic areas created by construction of a roof with structural truss- type members, provided the trusses are spaced no greater than thirty inches (30") apart. d. Attic areas created by construction of a roof structure utilizing a nontruss system, with spaces greater than five feet (5') in height, if all of the following criteria are met: (1) The area cannot be accessed directly from a habitable area within the same building level; and (2) The area shall have only the. minimum access required by the building code from the level below; and (3) The attic space shall not have a structural floor capable of supporting a "live load" greater than forty (40) pounds per square foot, and the "floor" of the attic space shall not be. improved with decking; and' (4) It must be demonstrated by the architect that a "truss- type" or similar structural system cannot be utilized as defined in the definition of floor area; and (5) It will be necessary that a structural element (i.e., collar- tie) be utilized when rafters are used for the roof system. In an unusual situation, such as when a bearing ridge system is used, the staff will review the space for compliance with this policy. e. Crawlspaces accessible through an opening not greater than twelve (12) square feet in area, with five feet (5') or less of ceiling height, as measured from the surface of the earth to the underside of structural floor members of the floor/ceiling assembly above. f. Basements: That part of a structure's lowest level which is located below-grade and deducted from GRFA. For the purposes of calculating GRFA, the total proportion of the lowest level's exterior wall perimeter located below grade (as measured twenty- four inches (24") below the finished floor elevation of the level above; to the lesser of the adjacent existing, finished, or interpolated grades) shall be the proportion of the horizontal area of that lowest level deducted from the GRFA calculations. g. Vaulted Spaces: Any interior space with afloor-to-ceiling height greater than fifteen feet (15'), as measured from the finished floor to the underside of the structural members of the floor/ceiling assembly above, shall be counted as GRFA on two levels of a structure. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 ~ 0 • h. Roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces, patios or similar features or spaces with no more than three (3) exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less.than twenty five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully open from floor to ceiling, with an allowance for a railing of up to forty four inches (44") in height and support posts with a diameter of eighteen inches (18") or less which are spaced no closer than ten feet (10') apart. The space between the posts shall be measured from the outer surface of the post. 2. Additional Calculation Provisions: a. Common Interior Party Walls: Where multiple dwelling units exist within one structure, GRFA shall be measured for each dwelling unit from the center of common interior party walls to the outside face of the sheathing of the exterior walls. b. Greenhouse Windows: Greenhouse windows (self-supporting windows) shall not be counted as GRFA. "Greenhouse windows" are defined according to the following criteria: 1. Distance Above Inside Floor Level: In order for a window • to be considered a greenhouse window, a minimum distance of thirty six inches (36") must be provided between the bottom of the window and the floor surface, as measured on the inside face of the building wall. (Floor surface shall not include steps necessary to meet building code egress requirements.) The thirty six inch (36")minimum was chosen because it locates the window too high to be comfortably used as a window seat and because it allows for a typical four foot (4') high greenhouse window to be used in a room with an eight foot (8') ceiling height. 2. Projection: No greenhouse window may protrude more than eighteen inches (18") from the exterior surface of the building. This distance allows for adequate relief for appearance purposes, without substantially adding to the mass and bulk of the building. 3. Construction Characteristics: All greenhouse windows shall be self-supporting and shall not require special framing or construction methods for support, with the exception that brackets below the window may be allowed provided they die into the wall of the building at a forty five degree (45°) angle. A small roof over the window may also be allowed provided • the overhang is limited to four inches (4")beyond the window plane. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 ~ 1 4. Dimensional Requirement: No greenhouse window shall • have a total window surface area greater than forty four (44) square feet. This figure was derived on the assumption that the maximum height of a window, in an average sized room, is four feet (4') and the maximum width for a four foot (4') high self-supporting window is between six feet (6') and eight feet (8') (approximately 32 square feet). Since the window would protrude no more than eighteen inches (18"), the addition of side windows would bring the overall window area to approximately forty four (44) square feet. 5. Quantity: Up to two (2) greenhouse windows will be allowed per dwelling unit, however, the forty four (44) square foot size limitation will apply to the combined area of the two (2) windows. 6. Site Coverage: Greenhouse windows do not count as site coverage. c. In the Two-Family and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Districts, GRFA is calculated based on the entire site area. B. Within all districts except the Single-Family Residential, Two-Family . Residential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Districts: 1. Gross Residential Floor Area Defined: The total square footage of all levels of a building, as measured at the inside face of the exterior walls (i.e., not including furring, Sheetrock, plaster and other similar wall finishes). GRFA shall include, but not be limited to, elevator shafts and stairwells at each level, lofts, fireplaces, bay windows, mechanical chases, vents, and storage areas. Attics, crawlspaces and roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces or patios shall also be included in GRFA, unless they meet the following provisions: b. Within buildings containing two (2) or fewer dwelling units, the following areas shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. GRFA shall be calculated by measuring the total square footage of a building as set forth in the definition above. Excluded areas as set forth herein, shall then be deducted from total square footage: 1: Enclosed garages of up to three hundred (300) square feet per vehicle space not exceeding a maximum of two (2) spaces for each allowable dwelling unit permitted by this title. 2. Attic space with a ceiling height of five feet (5') or less, as measured from the top side of the structural members Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 12 • of the floor to the underside of the structural members of the roof directly above. Attic area created by construction _ _. __.. of a roof with truss-type-members will be excluded from calculation as GRFA, provided the trusses are spaced no greater than thirty inches (30") apart. 3. Crawlspaces accessible through an opening not greater than twelve (12) square feet in area, with five feet (5') or less of ceiling height, as measured from the surface of the earth to the underside of structural floor members of the floor/ceiling assembly above. 4. Roofed or covered deck, porches, terraces, patios or similar features or spaces with no more than three (3) exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than twenty five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully open from floor to ceiling with an allowance for a railing of up to forty, four inches (44'`) in height. b. Within buildings containing more than two (2) allowable dwellings or accommodation units, the following additional areas • shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. GRFA shall be calculated by.measuring the total square footage of a building as set forth herein. Excluded areas as set forth shall then be deducted from the total square footage: 1. Enclosed garages to accommodate on-site parking requirements. 2. All or part of the following spaces, provided such spaces are common spaces: (a) Common hallways, stairways, elevator shafts and air locks. (b) Common lobby areas. (c) Common enclosed recreation facilities. (d) Common heating, cooling or ventilation systems, solar rock storage areas, or other mechanical systems. (e) Common closet and storage areas, providing access to such areas is from common hallways only. (f) Meeting and convention facilities. (g) Office space, provided such space is used exclusively for the management and operation of on-site facilities. (h) Floor area to be used in a type III "employee housing unit (EHU)" as defined and restricted by chapter 13 of this • title. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 .~ 3 3. All or part of an air lock within an accommodation or • dwelling unit not exceeding a maximum of twenty. five (25) square feet, providing such unit has direct access to the outdoors. 4. Overlapping stairways within an accommodation unit or dwelling unit shall only be counted at the lowest level. 5. Attic space with a ceiling height of five feet (5') or less, as measured from the top side of the structural members of the floor to the underside of the structural members of the roof directly above. Attic areas created by construction of a roof with truss-type members will be excluded from calculation as GRFA, provided the trusses are spaced no greater than thirty inches (30")apart. 6. Crawlspaces accessible through an opening not greater than twelve (12) square feet in area, with five feet (5') or less of ceiling height, as measured from the surface of the earth to the underside of structural floor members of the floor/ceiling assembly above. 7. Roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces, patios or • similar features or spaces with no more than three (3) exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than twenty five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully open from floor to ceiling, with an allowance for a railing of up to forty four inches (44") in height and support posts with a diameter of eighteen inches (18") or less which are spaced no closer than ten feet (10') apart. The space between the posts shall be measured from the outer surface of the post. 2. Additional Calculation Provisions: a. Walls: Interior walls are included in GRFA calculations. For two- familyand primary/secondary structures, common party walls shall be considered exterior walls. b. Greenhouse Windows: Greenhouse windows (self-supporting windows) shall not be counted as GRFA. "Greenhouse windows" are defined according to the following criteria: 1. Distance Above Inside Floor Level: In order for a window to be considered a greenhouse window, a • minimum distance of thirty six inches (36") must be Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 14 • provided between the bottom of the window and the floor surface, as measured on the inside face of the building wall. (Floor surface sha{I-not include steps necessary to meet building code egress requirements.) The thirty six inch (36") minimum was chosen because it locates the window too high to be comfortably used as a window seat and because it allows for a typical four foot (4') high greenhouse window to be used in a room with an eight foot (8') ceiling height. 2. Projection: No greenhouse window may protrude more than eighteen inches (18")from the exterior surface of the building. This distance allows for adequate relief for appearance purposes, without substantially adding to the mass and bulk of the building. 3. Construction Characteristics: All greenhouse windows shall be self-supporting and shall not require special framing or construction methods for support, with the exception that brackets below the window may be allowed provided they die into the wall of the building at a forty five degree (45°) angle. A small roof over the window may also • be allowed provided the overhang is limited to four inches (4") beyond the window plane. 4. Dimensional Requirement: No greenhouse window shall have a total window surface area greater than forty four (44) square feet. This figure was derived on the assumption that the maximum height of a window, in an average sized room, is four feet (4') and the maximum width for a four foot (4') high self-supporting window is between six feet (6') and eight feet (8') (approximately 32 square feet). Since the window would protrude no more than eighteen inches (18"), the addition of side windows would bring the overall window area to approximately forty four (44) square feet. 5. Quantity: Up to two (2) greenhouse windows will be allowed per dwelling unit, however, the forty four (44) square foot size limitation will apply to the combined area of the two (2) windows. 6. Site Coverage: Greenhouse windows do not count as site coverage. c. Vaulted Spaces: Vaulted spaces and areas "open to below" are c not included in GRFA calculations. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 15 d. Garage Credit: • 1. Allowable garage area is awarded on a ''per space basis", with a maximum of two (2) spaces per allowable unit. Each garage space shall be designed with direct and unobstructed vehicular access. All floor area included in the garage credit shall be contiguous to a vehicular space. 2. Alcoves, storage areas, and mechanical areas which are located in the garage and which are twenty five percent (25%) or more open to the garage area shall be included as garage credit. 3. Garage space in excess of the allowable garage credit shall be counted as GRFA. e. Crawl And Attic Space: 1. Crawlspaces created by a "stepped foundation", hazard mitigation, or other similar engineering requirement that has a total height in excess of five feet (5') may be excluded from GRFA calculations at the discretion of the administrator. • 2. If a roof structure is designed utilizing a nontruss system, and spaces greater than five feet (5') in height result, these areas shall not be counted as GRFA if all of the following criteria are met: (a) The area cannot be accessed directly from a habitable area within the same building level; (b) The area shall have the minimum access required by the building code from the level below (6 square foot opening maximum); (c) The attic space shall not have a structural floor capable of supporting a "live load" greater than forty (40) pounds per square foot, and the "floor" of the attic space cannot be improved with decking; (d) It must be demonstrated by the architect that a "truss type" or similar structural system cannot be utilized as defined in the definition of GRFA; and ~ (e) It will be necessary that a structural element (i.e., collar-tie) be utilized when rafters are used for the roof system. In an unusual situation, such as when a bearing ridge system is used, the staff will review the space for compliance with this policy. • Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 16 • Section 9. Subsection 12-15-4B (INTERIOR CONVERSIONS) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be~amended as follows: -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- -. -~ - - - -- (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#+slEe~. Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) B. Applicability: Within all zone districts except the Single-Family Residential, Two- FamilyResidential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Districts, dwelling units that meet or exceed allowable GRFA will be eligible to make interior conversions provided the following criteria are satisfied: 1. Any existing dwelling unit shall be eligible to add GRFA, via the "interior space conversion" provision in excess of existing or allowable GRFA including such units located in a special development district; provided, that such GRFA complies with the standards outlined herein. 2. For the purpose of this section, "existing unit" shall mean any dwelling unit that has been constructed prior to August 5, 1997, and has received a certificate of occupancy, or has been issued a building permit prior to August 5, 1997, or has received final design review board approval prior to August 5, 1997. • Section 10. Section 12-15-5 (ADDITIONAL GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA 250 ORDINANCE) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows: (Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#is~er~. Text which is to be added is indicated as bold italics.) A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to provide an inducement for the upgrading of existing dwelling units which have been in existence within the town for a period of at least five (5) years by permitting the addition of up to two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) to such dwelling units, provided the criteria set forth in this section are met. This section does not assure each single-family or two- family dwelling unit located within the town an additional two hundred fifty (250) square feet, and proposals for any additions hereunder shall be reviewed closely with respect to site planning, impact on adjacent properties, and applicable town development standards. The two hundred fifty (250) square feet of additional gross residential floor area may be granted to existing single-family dwellings, existing two-family and existing multi-family dwelling units only once, but may be requested and granted in more than one increment of less than two hundred fifty (250) square feet. Upgrading of an existing dwelling unit under this section shall include additions thereto or renovations thereof, but a demo/rebuild shall not be included as being eligible for additional gross residential \ floor area. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 17 • B. Applicability: The provisions of this section shall apply to dwelling units in all zone districts except the Single-Family Residential; Two-Family Residential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Zone Districts. C ~. Single-Family Dwellings And Two-Family Dwellings: Asingle-family ortwo-family dwelling unit shall be eligible for additional gross residential floor area (GRFA) not to exceed a maximum of two hundred fifty (250) square feet of GRFA in addition to the existing or allowable GRFA for the site. Before such additional GRFA can be granted, the single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit shall meet the following criteria: 1. Eligible Time Frame: Asingle-family ortwo-family dwelling unit shall be eligible for additional GRFA, pursuant to this section, if it is in existence prior to November 30, 1995, or a completed design review board application for the original construction of said unit has been accepted by the department of community development by November 30, 1995. In addition, at least five (5) years must have passed from the date the single-family dwelling or two-family dwelling unit was issued a certificate of occupancy (whether temporary or final) or, in the event a certificate of occupancy was not required for use of the dwelling at the time of completion, from the date of original completion and occupancy of the dwelling. 2. Use Of Additional Floor Space: Proposals for the utilization of the additional • gross residential floor area (GRFA) under this provision shall comply with all town zoning requirements and applicable development standards. If a variance is required for a proposal, it shall be approved by the planning and environmental commission pursuant to chapter 17 of this title before an application is made in accordance with this section. The applicant must obtain a building permit within one year of final planning and environmental commission approval or the approval for additional GRFA shall be voided. 3. Garage Conversions: If any proposal provides for the conversion of a garage or enclosed parking area to GRFA, such conversion will not be allowed unless: a) either the conversion will not reduce the number of enclosed parking spaces below the number required by this code; or b) provision is made for creation of such additional enclosed parking spaces as may be required for the new total GRFA under this code. Plans for a new garage or enclosed parking area, if required, shall accompany the application under this section, and shall be constructed concurrently with the conversion. 4. Parking: Any increase in parking requirements as set forth in chapter 10 of this title due to any GRFA addition pursuant to this section shall be met by the applicant. 5. Conformity With Guidelines: All proposals under this section shall be required to conform to the design review guidelines set~forth in chapter 11 of this title. A single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit for which an addition is proposed shall be required to meet the minimum town landscaping standards as set forth in Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 ~ chapter 11 of this title. Before any additional GRFA may be permitted in accordance with this section, the staff shall review the maintenance and upkeep of the existing. single-family or two-family dwelling and site, including landscaping, to determine whether they comply with the design review guidelines. No temporary certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any expansion of GRFA pursuant to this section until all required improvements to the site and structure have been completed as required. 6. Applicability: No pooling of gross residential floor area shall be allowed in single-family ortwo-family dwelling units. No application for additional GRFA shall request more than two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross residential floor area per single-family dwelling ortwo-family dwelling, nor shall any application be made for additional GRFA until such time as all the allowable GRFA has been constructed on the property, or an application is presently pending in conjunction with the application for additional GRFA that utilizes all allowable GRFA for the property. 7. One-Time Grant: Any single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit which has previously been granted additional GRFA pursuant to this section and is demo/rebuild, shall be rebuilt without the additional GRFA as previously approved. • 8. Demo/Rebuild Not Eligible: Any single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit which is to be demo/rebuild shall not be eligible for additional GRFA. 9. Nonconforming Structures And Site Improvements: Structures which do not conform to density controls shall be eligible for additional GRFA pursuant to this section. D O. Multi-Family Dwellings: Any dwelling unit in amulti-family structure that meets allowable GRFA shall be eligible for additional gross residential floor area (GRFA) not to exceed a maximum of two hundred fifty (250) square feet of GRFA in addition to the existing or allowable GRFA for the site. Any application of such additional GRFA must meet the following criteria: 1. Eligible Time Frame: Amultiple-family dwelling unit shall be eligible for additional GRFA, pursuant to this section, if it is in existence prior to November 30, 1995, or a completed design review board application for the original construction of said unit has been accepted by the department of community development by November 30, 1995. In addition, at least five (5) years must have passed from the date the building was issued a certificate of occupancy (whether temporary or final) or, in the event a certificate of occupancy was not required for use of the building at the time of completion, from the date of original completion and occupancy of the building. 2. Use Of Additional Floor Space: Proposals for the utilization of the additional ~~ GRFA under this provision shall comply with all town zoning requirements and applicable development standards. If a variance is required for a proposal, it Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 19 shal- be approved by the planning and environmental commission pursuant to chapter 17 of this title before an application is made in accordance with this section: The applicant must obtain a building permit within one~year of final planning and environmental commission approval or the approval for additional GRFA shall be voided. 3. Parking Area Conversions: Portions of existing enclosed parking areas may be converted to GRFA under this section if there is no loss of existing enclosed parking spaces in said enclosed parking area. 4. Parking Requirements Observed: Any increase in parking requirements due to any GRFA addition pursuant to this section shall be met by the applicant. 5. Guideline Compliance; Review: All proposals under this section shall be reviewed for compliance with the design review guidelines as set forth in chapter 11 of this title. Existing properties for which additional GRFA is proposed shall be required to meet minimum town landscaping standards as set forth in chapter 11 of this title. General maintenance and upkeep of existing buildings and sites, including the multi-family dwellings, landscaping or site improvements (i.e., trash facilities, berming to screen surface parking, etc.) shall be reviewed by the staff after the application is made for conformance to said design review guidelines. No temporary certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any expansion of GRFA pursuant to this section until all required improvements to the multi-family dwelling site and building have been completed as required. • ; 6. Condominium Association Submittal: An application for additional GRFA shall be made on behalf of each of the individual dwelling unit owners by the condominium association or similar governing body. 7. Applicability: The provisions of this section are applicable only to GRFA additions to individual dwelling units. No pooling of GRFA shall be allowed in multi-family dwellings. No application for additional GRFA shall request more than two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross residential floor area per dwelling unit nor shall any application be made for additional GRFA until such time as all the allowable GRFA has been constructed on the property. When exterior additions are proposed to amulti-family structure, the addition of the GRFA shall be designed and developed in context of the entire structure. 8. Nontransferable To Demo/Rebuild: Any building which has previously been granted additional GRFA pursuant to this section and is demo/rebuild, shall be rebuilt without the additional GRFA as previously approved. 9. Demo/Rebuild Not Eligible: Any multiple-family structure or dwelling unit which is to be demo/rebuild shall not be eligible for additional GRFA. 10. Nonconforming Structures And Site Improvements: Structures which do not conform to density controls shall be eligible for additional GRFA pursuant to this section. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 20 L E ~. Procedure: 1. Application; Content: Application shall be made on forms provided by the department of community development. If the property is owned in common (condominium association) or jointly with other property owners such as driveways or C parcels in duplex subdivisions, byway of example and not limitation, the written approval of the other property owner, owners or applicable owners' association shall be required. This can be either in the form of a letter of approval or signature on the application. The application shall also include: a. A fee pursuant to the current schedule shall be required with the application. b. Information and plans as set forth and required by subsection 12-11- 4C of this title. c. Any other applicable information required by the department of community development to satisfy the criteria outlined in this section. 2. Hearing Set; Notice: Upon receipt of a completed application for additional GRFA, the design review board shall set a date for a hearing in accordance with subsection 12-11-4C2 of this title. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with subsections 12-11-4C2 and C3 of this title. • 3. Compliance Determined: If the department of community development staff determines that the site for which the application was submitted is in compliance with town landscaping and site improvement standards, the applicant shall proceed as follows: a. Application for GRFA additions which involve no change to the exterior of a structure shall be reviewed and approved by the department of community development. b. Applications for GRFA additions involving exterior changes to a building shall be reviewed and approved by the design review board in accordance with the provisions of this section. 4. Compliance Required: If the department of community development staff determines that the site for which additional GRFA is applied for pursuant to this section does not comply with minimum town landscaping or site standards as provided herein, the applicant will be required to bring the site into compliance with such standards before any such temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy will be issued for the additional GRFA added to the site. Before any building permit is issued, the applicant shall submit appropriate plans and materials indicating how the site will be brought into compliance with said town minimum standards, which plans and materials shall be reviewed by and approved by the department of community development. • 5. Building Permit: Upon receiving the necessary approvals pursuant to this Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 21 section, the applicant shall proceed with the securing of a building permit prior to • beginning the construction of additional GRFA. Section 12. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 13. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 14. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 15. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore • repealed. , • Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 22 • INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 1St day of June, 2004 and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the _ day of _ , 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. ATTEST: Rod Slifer, Mayor Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk • READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 2004. Rod Slifer, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk • Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 23