HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-06-01 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessionr
TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION AGENDA
11:30 A.M. TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2004
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and
cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will
consider an item.
1 • ITEM/TOPIC: Lunch for Council and Staff at the Fire Station
before the Work Session. (60 min.)
2• ITEM/TOPIC: Site Visit: Middle Creek. Please wear appropriate
footwear and meet at TOV parking lot to van to site (60 min.)
3. Matt Mire ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(b)
Conference with Attorney, re: Council Training (30 min.)
4• ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update (10 min.)
5. Pam Brandmeyer ITEM/TOPIC: Year to date financial results and out-
Stan Zemler of-cycle requests for funding. (30 min.)
CURRENT GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
A. Red Sandstone multi-use recreation facility.
Please see memorandum
RETT CAPITAL FUNDING PROGRAM
B. AIPP-Artist in Residence Building
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: AIPP is requesting the town
partner in its effort to renovate the Anholtz Ranch cabin located on
the lower bench of Ford Park. The goal of the project is to turn the
cabin into an artist-in-residence program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Fund $40,000 of $78,000 request,
utilizing RETT funds.
COUNCIL CONTRIBUTION
C. Channel s
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Earlier this year in a status
review re: Channel 5, Council directed Channel 5 to return in June
• for an out-of--cycle funding request for equipment upgrades and
replacement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny Funding
D. WCTB Community_Host Program
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:. In order to get the WCTB in
sync with current year and '05 requests, staff has asked them for
separate submittal for parking passes for the '04-05 ski season,
and then Council wilt see the WCTB back in August for the '05-
'06 ski season. In the past, the Community Host program has
been funded through a 25 blue parking pass contribution from the
Town of Vail, as well as a matching 25 Merchant Ski Pass
contribution from Vail Resort, with the WCTB providing oversight
and management of the volunteers. In addition to the 25 blue
parking passes, you will note a request from Suzanne Silverthorn
attached asking for nine more parking passes to cover the '04= 05
fall/spring construction volunteers.
The additional 9 parking passes will allow the WCTB to staff the
following days and times that you originally requested being two
people from Sept 7 -Oct 17, 10am - 6pm (eight hours/day) and
one person Oct 18 - 30, same hours. This would be 744 hours
total for the fall. Each host works 80 hours to fulfill their
requirement for a ski pass/parking pass, subsequently the WCTB
requires an additional 9.3 blue passes to facilitate the Hosts
during the fall.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Fund 34 blue parking passes for
'04-'05 ski season.
FUTURE GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
E. Department of Justice ADA Requirements
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Staff has received a preliminary estimate (attached) for the town's
ADA compliance costs of $116,822. Since the estimate was
received at 9:00 A.M. Thursday, May 27, staff has not had the
opportunity to research how to pay for these federally mandated
requirements. A portion of the requirements are directly related to
parks and recreation facilities that the town oversees, so an
estimate of costs appropriate as a charge-back to AIPP will be
suggested. Additionally, staff will look at current capital projects
already funded in '04 to evaluate whether Council might consider
moving those into '05 in order to reallocate funding. Also, there
may be some additional cost savings based on "interpretation" of
the taw and we will continue to work with the Department of
Justice to understand the requirements. Staff will return on the
15th of June for further discussion of funding sources. The
Department of Justice has imposed a timeframe of June 14, 2004,
to sign the stipulation decree. Staff requests Council authorize the
Town Manager to enter into said stipulation because the next
- -Council- meeting; at which- time staff will present options for
funding, does not occur within the June 14th timeframe.
6: Bill Gibson ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, an ordinance
amending Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, to
amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulations in
the Hillside Residential (HR), Single-Family Residential
(SFR),Two-Family Residential (R), Two-Family
Primary/Secondary Residential (PS). (60 min.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 10, Series of
2004 on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
On September 8, 2003, the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission. voted 6-0 to forward a
recommendation of approval for proposed text amendments to the
gross residential floor area (GRFA) regulations for Vail's
residential zone districts. This item was tabled for further
discussion from the Town Council's May 18, 2004, meeting.
7• ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from the Mayor (10 min.)
8• ITEMlTOPIC: Adjournment (3:30 P.M.)
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BEGIN AT 2 P.M. TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2004 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BEGIN AT 6 P.M. TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2004, IN VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
CHAMBERS
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please
call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
•
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
• PUBLIC MEETING
Monday, May 24, 2004
NO LUNCH _
PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:45 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT
David Viele
Anne Gunion
Bill Jewitt
Chas Bernhardt
Doug Cahill
George Lamb
Rollie Kjesbo
MEMBERS ABSENT
Site Visits
1. The Wren - 500 South Frontage Road West
Driver: George
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the Commission may break for dinner from 6:00 -
6:30 p.m.
• Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers
2:00 pm
A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, to
allow for the conversion of an existing commercial unit to a residential dwelling unit, located at 500
South Frontage Road West, Unit B-111 (The Wren)/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Michael D. Krohn
Planner: Matt Gennett
APPROVED WITH AN AMENDED CONDITION
1. That the applicant plants a minimum of three, 10' tall evergreen trees on the northeast
corner of the property near the existing trash enclosure, irrigated with the existing system, to
better screen the parking and trash enclosure from view prior to the issuance of a building
permit for Unit 6111. The final location shall be reviewed and approved by staff.
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 6-1(Lamb Opposed)
Matt Gennett made a representation per the staff memorandum dated May 24, 2004. Based upon
the review of the application and the criteria as outlined in the staff memorandum, staff is
recommending approval of the applicant's request. Staff's recommendation of approval carried with
it one condition as outlined on page 8 of the staff memorandum. The applicant had nothing new to
add to the presentation. There was no public comment. The Commissioners discussed the
application and expressed a concern with the proposed condition as stated regarding required
', landscaping and compliance with 12-6H-11 of the Vail Town Code. The Commissioners generally
• agreed that the proposal complies with the criteria as outlined in the staff memorandum.
T~WNOFt~AlL
2. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12- •
7H-7, Vail Town Code, and a request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to
Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of the Lionshead Core Site Hotel and
the operation on a new private skier club, new lodge dwelling units and conference facilities and
meeting rooms on the first floor or street level floor of a structure, located at 675 Lionshead
Place/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department upon. request).
Applicant: Vail Corporation
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED TO JUNE 14, 2004
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND.. Viele VOTE:7-0
Russ Forrest made a presentation per the staff memorandum dated May 24, 2004. As this is not a
final review of a proposed application, staff is not making a recommendation at this time. Doug Cahill
asked about the over all timeline, to which Russ Forrest responded that we are still on course. Tom
Braun, of Braun Associates, gave a presentation on the overall design of the project. Geoff Wright,
speaking on behalf of the Landmark Condominium Association questioned the east-west orientation of
the building, the location of build to lines and the ability to maintain similar rights of access to build to
lines, and lastly, questioned how emergency access to the west end of Lionshead would be
addressed. The Commissioners expressed concern with regard to building height and the
arrangement of the building mass on the site. Suggestions for rearranging the bulk and mass was
made to improve upon the scale and character of the building in context to the urban design
Lionshead. Questions of pedestrian flow and circulation around all of Lionshead were raised. A fear
of creating a black hole was expressed and suggestions for improving the pedestrian traffic flow were
provided. The Commissioners requested information from staff regarding compliance with zoning •
regulations and master plans recommendations (ie, master plan recommendations, sun/shade
analysis, pedestrian scale model, etc.). The Commissioners agreed that the buildings were nicely
designed and well thought out but questioned the future build out scenario given this design. A
recommendation for breaking down continuous ridgelines was suggested.
3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special
Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, to allow for the redevelopment of the Manor Vail
Lodge, and a request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of Type III Employee
Housing Units, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3, Vail Town Code, located at 595 Vail Valley Drive/Lots
A, B, & C, Vail Village 7th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Manor Vail, represented by Melick and Associates
Planner: Warren Campbell
TABLED TO JUNE 14, 2004
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: ?-0
4. A request for a variance from Section 12-21-14, Restrictions In Specific Zones On~ Excessive
Slopes, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of driveways and surface parking in excess
of 10% of the total site area, located at 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Block G, Vail das Schone
Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Snow Now, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
TABLED TO JUNE 14, 2004
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE:7-0
5. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to allow •
for a new single family residence to exceed the allowable building height, located at 4916 Juniper
Lane/Lot 4, Block 5, Bighorn Subdivision 5th Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Viking Limited, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects
Planner: Matt Gennett
2
WITHDRAWN
6. An appeal of an administrative interpretation of Section 12-15-3(A)(1)(d), Definition, Calculation,
• and Exclusions Gross Residential Floor Area, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-3(B),
Administrative Action, Vail Town Code, determining that a proposed unenclosed area shall not be
.considered (GRFA) in the GRFA calculation for the Purchase Residence, located at 1310 Greenhill
Court/Lot 17, Glen Lyon Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Appealant: Barry E. Cunningham
Planner: Matt Gennett '
WITHDRAWN
7. Approval of minutes
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: ?-0
8. Information Update
• GRFA
9. Adjournment
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Jewitt VOTE:?-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
• 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published, May 21, 2004 in the Vail Daily.
•
3
~.:
• DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
May 19, 2004
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING ,
PUBLIC WELCOME
•
•
PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department
MEMBERS PRESENT
Joe Hanlon
Bill Pierce
Scott Proper
Margaret Garvey Rogers
Diana Mathias
SITE VISITS
1. Gannett - 796 Forest Road
2. Hawkwood - 483 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 5B
3. Irwin - 1956 West Gore Creek Drive
5. Perkins - 2568 Arosa Drive
6. Kaufman - 4515 Bighorn Road
7. Dauskurdas - 4937 Juniper Lane
8. Ginsberg - 2950 Booth Creek Drive
0
12:00 pm
2:00 pm
Driver: George
PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Hawkwood Inc. Residence DRB04-0141 '
Conceptual review of a residential addition
483 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 5B /Lot 56, Vail Village Filing 4
Applicant: Hawkwood, Inc. represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
2. Kaufman Residence DRB04-0140
Final review of a residential addition
4515 Bighom Road /Lot D, Spruce Park Estates
Applicant: Steven Kaufman
MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED
CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH TWO CONDITIONS
3:00 pm
George
Warren
1-That the applicant record an amended plat for Spruce Park Estates, A
Resubdivision of Lots 6 ~ 7, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision Third Addition;
Amended Plat, which revises the existing plat to include the new addition on Lot D
as identified on the existing plat, prior to 'requesting either a Temporary Certificate.
of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy.
~~
1 ~o~voFV~ `'
MEMBERS ABSENT
2-That the plans submitted for a building permit include a limits of disturbance •
fence shown on the plans.
3. Gannett Residence DRB04-0145 George
Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence
796 Forest Road /Lot 13, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6
Applicant: Doug & Kathy Gannett, represented by Steve Riden
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
4. Dauskurdas Residence DRB04-0148 Matt
Final review of a residential addition
4937 Juniper Lane /Lot 4, Block 4, Bighorn 5~' Addition
Applicant: Galen A. Aasland, Architect, P.C.
MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Mathias VOTE: 4-1 (Proper Opposed)
APPROVED
CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION
1- If the copper metal flashing proposed by the applicant is not feasible, metal.flashing
painted a dark color is acceptable.
5. Perkins Residence DRB04-0157 Bill
Final review of a minor alteration
2568 Arosa Drive/Lot 4, Block C, Vail Das Schone Filing 1
Applicant: Mary E. Perkins
MOTION: Proper SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 2-3 (Pierce, Rogers, •
Mathias Opposed)
DENIED
CONDITIONS: The applicant shall submit a new application for Design Review to the
Community Development Department proposing a revised color scheme by no later than
May 24, 2004. The applicant shall then appear before the Town of Vail Design Review
Board on Wednesday, June 16, 2004 for consideration of the amended application.
Depending upon the outcome of the review on June 16th, the applicant shall be required
to paint the residence the colors approved on June 16th or repaint the residence the
original colors as they existed prior to illegally painting the residence without approval.
6. Ginsberg Residence DRB04-0150 Matt
Final review of a residential addition
2950 Booth Creek Drive /Lot 2, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 11
Applicant: John M. Perkins
MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Mathias VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED
CONDITIONS:' NONE
7. Devaney Residence DRB04-0098 Warren
Final review of a residential addition
2565 Cortina Lane/Lot 2, Blocfc F, Vail das Schone Filing 1
Applicant: Elfriede Devaney
MOTION: ~ Rogers SECOND: Mathias VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED •
CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION
1-That the applicant revise the south elevation, prior to submitting for a building permit,
to have the proposed doors for the new units on top of the garage match identically.
2
r
• 8. VML, LLC DRB04-0146 George
Final review of changes to approved plans
352 East Meadow Drive, Unit 1 /Tract B, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Zehren and Associates, Inc., represented by Tim Losa
MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Proper VOTE: 5-0
TABLED TO JUNE 2, 2004
9. Irwin Residence DRB04-0111 Matt
Conceptual review of a residential addition
1956 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 45, Vail Village West Filing 2
Applicant: David Irwin
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
10. West Vail Lodge DR604-0188 Matt
Final review of a new sign
2278, 2288, 2298 Chamonix Lane and 2211 North Frontage Road/ Lots 1, 2, 3,
and Tract C Vail Das Schone Filing 1 and Inn at West Vail Lot 1, Block A,
Vail Das Schone Filing 3
Applicant: Raj Bhakta
MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Proper VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
CONDITIONS: APPROVED WITH FOUR CONDITIONS
1-That the applicant installs black, metal lettering pinned into the stucco face.
• 2- Only two landscape lights for each face of the sign are permitted (no soffit lights) to be
installed at time of construction.
3 -The applicant will ensure the roof over the sign matches the building's roof prior to the
issuance of a TCO.
4 -The applicant shall make the lettering of this monument sign no larger than 10.5
square feet upon installation as permitted
11. Basingdale 5 LLC DRB04-0144
Final review of a new primary/secondary residence
2830 Basingdale Blvd. /Lot 5, Block 9, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Peter Cope
MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Pierce
DENIED
12. Gramalegui Residence DRB04-0162
Final review of changes to approved plans
2614 Larkspur Lane/Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Greg Gramalegui
MOTION: Proper SECOND: Mathias
APPROVED
CONDITIONS:
• 13. Vail Resorts (Golden Peak) DRB04-0187
Final review of a minor alteration
Tract E, Vail Village Filing 5
Applicant: Vail Resorts
VOTE: 4-0-1 (Proper
Abstained)
Matt
George
VOTE: 3-2 (Hanlon, Rogers
Opposed)
Russ
3
MOTION: Proper SECOND: Rogers VOTE: 5-0 .
TABLED TO JUNE 2, 2004
Staff Approvals
Richmond-Essl Residence DRB04-0155 Bill
Final review of a minor alteration
1090 Vail View Drive, Unit 3 (Telemark Townhomes)/Lot 61, Block B, Lions Ridge Filing 1
Applicant: Eagle County Images
Dore Residence DRB04-0151 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration
100 Vail Road/Lot 35, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Alpine Construction & Remodel
Browning Residence DRB04-0152 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration
641 West Lionshead Circle, Unit 222/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3
Applicant: Bartock Builders, lnc., represented by Greg Bartock
Terhar Residence DR604-0172 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration
1650 Sunburst Drive, Unit 56/Lot 56, Vail Golf Course Townhome
Applicant: John Terhar, represented by ASE, Inc. •
Stempler Residence DR604-0174 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration
1044 Homestake Circle/Lot 4, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 7
Applicant: Gerald Stempler, represented by Wing Construction
Rimski, Inc. Residence DR604-0173 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration
394 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 7, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 3
Applicant: John Milligan
Vail Run Resort Alteration DRB04-0176 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration
1000 Lions Ridge Loop/Lot C-11, Lions Ridge Filing 1
Applicant: Mike Krohn, Rusty Spike Enterprises
Dougherty Residence DRB04-0122 Matt
Final review of a minor alteration
2039 Sunburst Drive, Units A 8~ B/Lot 16, Vail Valley Filing 3
Applicant: Bill Joseph and Associates, Inc. '
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- •
2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
4
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Town Council
From: Pam Brandmeyer
Judy Camp
Stan Zemler
Date: May 27, 2004
Subject: Mid-Year Funding
Financial Results through April
A summary of General Fund financial results through April is attached. Although results
aze favorable versus budget across the board, staff does not recommend any significant
changes to the budget at this time.
Sales tax, our most important source of revenue, is favorable to budget by $190,677 or
4.8% through Mazch collections, which are included in April results. However, we have
just entered atwo-month construction period for the Village Streetscape with another two
months of construction scheduled for the fall. Although the favorable collections to date
are encouraging, they could be eroded by the uncertainty of the next several months.
Compensation to-date also looks favorable. This is expected in part because the budget
• assigns compensation equally across twelve months of the year, while most salary
increases occur in June. Thus, we expect to be somewhat under budget in the first five
months and somewhat over budget in the last seven months with the variances offsetting
by year-end. Also, some benefits are reconciled and recorded only at yeaz end, thus
creating some favorability during the year. '
Since out-of--cycle contributions aze a major component of Tuesday's discussion, we have
also attached a schedule of contributions paid through April. Although again, the budget
calendarization assumes equal disbursements over 12 months, payments are made
differently for each group. No disbursements have been made to the VCBA through
April pending completion of a contract. The chamber has agreed that the town may set
aside $50,000 of the $200,000 budgeted because the town contributed more in 2003 than
the VCBA spent. This money would then be earmarked for future economic
development research. The 2004 contribution of $75,000 planned for the Pro Cycling
Tour at Vail has also not been paid yet.
•
040527 Mid-YEar Funding _ 1 _
Version 1
•
•
TOWN OF VAIL
SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES AS OF 4/30/04
GENERAL FUND
Revenue
Local Taxes:
Sales Tax
Property and Ownership
Ski Lift Tax
Franchise Fees, Penalties, and Other Taxes
Licenses & Permits
Intergovernmental Revenue
Transportation Centers
Charges for Services
Fines 8 Forteitures
Earnings on Investments
Rental Revenue
Miscellaneous and Project Reimbursements
Total Revenue
2004 2004
2004 Amended Amended 2004
Budget Budget Budget Actuals
as of 4/30/04 as of 4/30/04
5 8,835,480 8,881,480 ~ 3,940,149 4,130,826
2,646,855 2,646,945 882,290 984,530
2,420,500 2,420,500 1,691,887 1,750,098
643,500 643,500 214,492 254,968
986,320 986,320 234,174 215,078
1,318,775 1,351,989 442,828 437,118
2,928,500 2,945,700 1,817,423 1,803,722
807,485 607,485 202,801 149,338
189,250 189,250 83,072 92,412
109,000 109,000 36,332 -
707,142 707,142 235;704 260,312
36,950 98,397 18,810 52 532
21,427,757 21,587,708 9,779,962 10130 932
Variance
Fav(Unfav)
190,677
102,240
58,209
40,478
(19,096)
(5,710)
(13,701)
(53,483)
29,340
(36,332)
24,808
33,722
350,970
Expenditures
Salaries
Overtime
Benefits
Subtotal Compensation and Benefits
Contributions and Special Events
All Other Operating Expenses
Heavy Equipment Operating Charges
Heavy Equipment Replacement Charges
Dispatch Services
Total Expenditures
Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
GF yr to date 040527
9,399,864 9,581,932 3,118,808 2,985,714 130,894
444,047 453,997 149,819 165,774 (15,955)
3,400,578 3,447,386 1,128,070 1,008 808 117,262
13,244,487 13,463,295 4,392,497 4,160296 232,201
1,167,348 1,187,348 385,224 400,047 (14,823)
4,575,345 4,681,257 1,544,815 1,384,251 160,564
1,463,158 1,469,908 585,263 578,900 6,363
405,467 405,467 162,187 150,851 11,536
463,813 463,813 153,058 154 804 (1,548)
21,319,816 21,651,086 7,223,044 6,828 749 394,295
108,141 (63,378) 2,556,918 3,302183 745,265
9,016,571 10,470,987
$ 9,124,712 $ 10,407,609
-2-
•
• •
Vendor
Vail Community TV-Cnnl 5
Eagle Valley Child Care
Bravo! NY Philharmonic
Bravo! Colorado
Vail Valley Foundation-Hot Summer Nights
Vail Valley Foundation-Int'I Dance Festival
Vail Valley Foundation-Street Beat
WCTB-merged Chamber operations
WCTB-Information Services
Vail Jazz Foundation
2009 World Champions
Vail Farmers Market Traffic Control
Rocky Mountain Bike Classic
Vail Chamber & Business Assoc
Vail Valley Athletic Club
Youth Recognition Award
Vail Valley Foundation-Amercian Ski Classic
Spring Back to Vail
Holidays In Vail
Street Entertainment
King of the Mtn Volleyball
"Y05" NY Eve for Youth
Western Regional Softball
Big Wheel Bres N' Chili
Taste of Vail
Administrative Services
Event Recruitment
Research Event Evaluation
Total Disbursements
2004 Paid to date Remaining Dollars
Budget 4/30/04 to disperse Reasoning
57,000 16,540 40,460 quarterly disbursements
30,000 7,875 22,125 quarterly disbursements
95,000 95,000 _
21,375 21,375 _
20,000 20,000 _
12, 500 12, 500 _
16,571 16,571 _
25,000 25;000 _
166,500 124,875 41,625 fourth quarter payment
6,650 6,650 _ .
160,000 - 160,000 waiting for invoice
5,000 - 5,000 future event
75,000 - 75,000 waiting for invoice
200,000 - 200,000 no contract to date
4,750 - 4,750 waiting for invoice
7,000 7,000 to be paid out in May 8 June
20,000 20,000 _
40,000 13,350 26,650 paid out of fund 132
20,000 - 20,000 future event
55,000 - 55,000 future event
7,500 5,000 2,500 final payment
5,000 - 5,000 future event
1,400 - 1,400 future event
26,400 - 26,400 future event
5,000 - 5,000 payment processed
33,350 9,311 24,039 salary
35,000 - 35,000 on going
16,000 6,000 10,000 on going
1,166,996 400,047 766,949
GF yr to date 040527 _3 _
•
MEMORANDUM'
TO: Town Council
FROM: Stan Zemler
Greg Hall
Susie Hervert
SUBJ: Red Sandstone Multi-use Facility
Over the past several years, attempts have been made to construct a multipurpose
recreational facility in the Town of Vail (TOV). After the demolition of the old TOV Shops
several sites were considered and Red Sandstone School was proposed. The proposed
facility is a 8;742 square foot, free standing structure with an at grade entry. The uses
are distributed as follows:
Lower Level:
The lower level, 5,570 square feet, has an entry foyer and reception desk to collect fees
• and assist the public. There also includes a 1200 sq. ft. multi-purpose room to be used
for dance, yoga, and other activities.
,Main Level:
The main level will include administrative offices, restroom /changing rooms and a
gymnastics area.
Funding:
The project has several funding partners.
Including:
$380,000
$150,000
$100, 000
$250,000
$150, 000
$65,000
Vail valley Water & Sewer
Town of Vail
Town of Vail (convert to cash)
Vail Resorts
Eagle County School District
Eagle County School District (Parking Lot
Improvements)
Total $1,095,000
This project received PEC` approval in March 2004 and was presented to the Council
shortly after. Council directed staff to move forward with design and bidding of the
project. Council also expressed concerns as did the PEC about parking and traffic
• management. Staff has been working with school staff and VRD to develop an IGA to
address use of the building and parking issues.
Bids for this ro'ect were o ened on Ma 20"' with Viele Construction bein low bidder •
p J P Y 9
at $1,220,000 million. This creates a funding gap of about $500,000.
In order to fund the approximate gap of $500,000 staff is proposing two possible
approaches.
Proposal to fund the project:
1.
The Vail Recreation District has indicated a willingness to participate in
funding the facility by committing $400,000. This proposal would involve
the TOV making a loan to the VRD to be paid back at $40,000 per year
for ten years. An additional fee of $500 would be charged, and
committed to a building replacement fund to help offset the cost of major
repairs.
Or:
The TOV makes up the funding gap, and charges VRD rent and monthly
maintenance fees.
2. Town original commitment of~in kind be converted to a cash contribution.
Staff Recommendation: •
Staff recommends that this project move forward. To facilitate this occurrence, the
following Council actions are proposed:
1. Approve the concept of a ten year loan with the VRD to total $400,000
paid back at a rate of $40,000 per year over a ten year period: An
additional payment of $500 a month will be committed to a major
maintenance fund. Give the Town Manager the authority to negotiate and
enter into such an agreement.
2.
3. Authorize a total bud4et of $1.475.000 to be added to the Capital
Projects Fund. $500,000 would be transferred from the Capital Fund
balance with the remaining coming from other groiect contributors. This
would still leave over $2,400,000 in the FY2004 ending Capital Fund
Balance.
4. _ Authorize the commitment of up to $100.000 from the Capital Fund as
a substitute for the originally proposed TOV in kind support.
•
AIPP REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS
CONTENTS
1.. LETTER EXPLAINING THE PROJECT
2. PHOTO OF BUILDING
3. PROJECT BUDGET
4. LIST OF REQIRED MATERIALS AND SERVICES
INDICATING DONATIONS
5. AIPP BUDGET
6. ELEVATIONS OF RENOVATED BUILDING.
•
TOWN OF SAIL
•
1309 Elkhorn Drive Art in Public Places
mail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2344
Fax: 970-479-2166
20 May, 2004
Judy Camp
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado
Dear Judy
One of Vail's few historic buildings is slowly deteriorating. The former dwelling dates from 1922
and was part of the Anholtr Ranch which was purchased by the town in the early 1970's. Until
recently the building was used by the Vail Recreation District for sports equipment storage. For
the last few years the Ford Park structure, which the Art iri Public Places (AIPP) program calls
the "Art Shack", has featured boarded up windows or windows with broken glass, a padlocked
door, and an interior floor that is unsafe to walk on: AIPP would like to restore the building, make
it ADA accessible and open to the public. We would like to see it function as a place where the
public can see an artist working, witness the creative process and understand more about art and
how artists work. It could also be a venue for art exhibitions, lectures, and instruction and be
available for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens to use for programs and classes. •
In 2003 the town council gave AIPP permission to renovate the building and use it for cultural
programs. Architects, planners and engineers all donated their time and a building permit was
finally awarded by the town. .The consulting architect and former AIPP board member, Kyle
Webb solicited donations from material suppliers. NEDBO construction donated laborers and the
interior was stripped, tiles sent for asbestos testing and the initial demolition work begun.
Honeywagon donated trash removal and the dumpster was quickly filled. Windows were
purchased at cost thanks to the efforts of Kathy Langenwalter. After cleaning out the debris and
removing drywall, the structure of the building was exposed. It was determined that the building's
construction methods and materials will not meet safety codes. The foundation is rudimentary.
NEDBO Construction prepared an estimate to restore the building and bring it up to code. AIPP
funds and donations will not meet all of the costs to renovate the building. The estimate for the
work including labor and materials is $140,000. AIPP has dedicated $30,000 from its 2004
budget for the project and donations of material and labor equal approximately $50,000.
Unfortunately, the cost of materials has risen almost 30% since the estimate was prepared in
January. Therefore we are requesting $78,000 from the Town of Vail to complete the renovations
to this historic building.
Yours sincerely,
The Art in Public Places Board of Directors
•
~~ RECYCLEDPAPER
•
::,:_:: .
•
Nedbo Construction, Inc.
Artist Shack @ Ford Park
Takeoff Worksheet
Job# 2357 to 2357
Takeoff V14orksheet
01 /21104
Extended
Cost Code Description Unit Quantity Price Ex~ Price Bid Price
Job: 2357
Bid Item: 1000 Div 1 -General Conditions
1000.000 Building Permit (100)
1200.000 Supervision -Nedbo Cosst.
1300.000 Design & Engineering Fees -Donations
1610.000 Interim Clean-up
1620.000 Final Clean-up.
1700.000 Trash Truck
1750.000 Landfill Fees
1900.000 Project Closeout
1995.000 Contractor's Fee
Bid Item: 2000 I
2050.000
2050.000
2250.000
,2290.000
2400.000
2900.000
liv 2 - Sitework
Demolition
..Carpenter
..Laborer
Trenching for Sewer, Water & Electrical
Site Grading -Hand Labor
Slab on Grade Prep inc. Structural Fill
Landscaping
Bid Item: 3000 Div 3 -Concrete
3300.000 Foundations Existing Repairs
3500.000 Slab-on-Grade
Report 9-5-0-01
tom . •
is 1.00 1,650.000000 1,650.00 1,650.00
mo 2.00 8;500.000000 17,000.00 17,000.00
hrs 60.00 35.000000 2,100.00 2,100.00
hrs 32.00 35.000000 1,120.OU 1,120.00
trps 2.00 300.000000 600.00 600.00
tns 8.00 55.000000 440.00 440.00
hrs 8.00 50.000000 400.00 400.00
10% 1.00 12,738.000000 12,738.00 12,738.00
Bid Item Total: 36,048.00 36,048.00
hrs 32.00 50.000000 1,600.00 1,600.00.
hrs 80.00 35.000000 2,800.00 2,800.00
Is 1.00 2,500.000000 2,500.00 2,500.00
hrs 40.00 35.000000 1,400.00 l ,400.00
sf 420.00 3.000000 1,260.00 1,260.00
allow ~ 1.00 1,500.000000 1,500.00 1,500.00
Bid Item Total: 11,060.U0 11,060.00
allow 1.00 2,000.000000 2,000.00 2,000.00
sf 420.00 3.500000 1,470.00 1,470.00
' 1 /2004
P ~ PM
• • •
Takeoff Worksheet
Continued... 01/21/04
Cost Code Description Extended
Unit Quantity Price Ext. Price Bid Price
3500.000 Concrete Staining sf
420.00 1.000000 420.00 420.00
Bid Item: 4000 Div 4 -Masonry Bid Item Total: 3,890.00 3,890.00
4210.000 patio Pavers sf
200.00 8.000000 1,600.00 1,600.00
Bid Item: 6000 . Div 6 -Woods Bid Item Total: 1,600.00 1,600.00
6100.000 Rough Carpentry ~.s
6110.000
Rough Framing Material
Is 240.00 50.000000 12,000.00 12,000.00
6150.000
Exterior Trim & Siding
~s 1.00 10,000.000000 10,000.00 10,000.00
6150.000 ..Siding
sf 120.00 50.000000
~ 6,000.00 6,000.00
6150.000
..1x6 Exterior Trim
If 750.00 6.500000 4,875.00 4,875.00
6150.000
Trellis Cedar Material
allow 300.00 15.000000 4,500.00 4,500.00
6175.000 Backing & Blocking hrs 1.00 500.000000 500.00 500.00
6210.000 Interior Plywood for Walls 4.00 50.000000 200.00 200.00
6200.000
Install Interior Plywood ea
hrs 30.00 20.000000 600.00 600.00
6200.000
Finish Carpentry
hrs 48.00 50.000000 2,400.00 2,400.00
6210.000
Finish Materials
is 60.00 50.000000 3,000.00 3,000.00
6210.000
Case
if 1.00 1,000.000000 1,000.00 1,000.00
6200.000
..Installation
~ if 100.00 2.500000 250.00 250.00
' 6210.000
•Base
If 100.00 2.000000 200.00 200,00
6200.000
..Installation
if 80.00 2.500000 200.00 200.00
80.00 1.500000 120.00 120.00
Bid Item: 7000 Div 7 - ThermaUMoisture Prote Bid Item Total: 45,845.00 45,845.00
7100.000 Waterproof Membrane for Roof
sf
7100.000 Tyvek Exterior Moisture Barrier
sf 700.00 5.000000 3,500.00 3,500.00
7100.000
3 Mil Interior Vapor Barrier
sf 600.00 1.500000 900.00 900.00
7200.000
Insulation -Ceiling
sf 1,240.00 1.000000 1,240.00 1,240.00
7200.000
Insulation -Walls
sf 600.00 2.500000 1,500.00 1,500.00
7310.000
Roofing Shingles
sf 640.00 2.000000 1,280.00 1,280.00
7310.000
Siding Shingles
sf 700.00 8.000000 5,600.00 5,600.00
100.00 8.000000 800.00 800.00
Report 9-5-0-01
tom Page 2 01/21/2004
03:30 PM
Takeoff Worksheet
Continued...
01/21/04
~ Cost Code Description
Bid Item: 8000 Div 8 -Doors & Windows
8200.000 Exterior French Wood Doors
8600.000 „Hanging
8600.000 Wood Windows - Eagl at cost
8600.000 ..Installation
8700.000 Exterior Door Hardware
8700.000 .,Installation
Bid Item: 9000 Div 9 -Finishes
9250.000 Gypsum Drywall Ceiling
Painting
9900.000 ,.Interior
9900.000 ..Exterior
Bid Item: 15000 Div 15 -Plumbing & Mechanica
15400.000 plumbing, Water & Sewer
Bid Item: 16000 Div 16 - Electrical
16400.000 Main Electrical Service
16500.000 Electrical
Unit
ea allow
ea
bid
hrs
ea
ea
sf
sf
is
allow
is
allow
Extended
Quantity
Price
Bid Item Total:
1.00 2,000.000000
1.00 200.000000
1.00 2,000.000000
24.00 50.000000
1.00 150.000000
1.00 100.000000
Bid Item Total:
600.00 3.500000
420.00 5.000000
1.00 2,000.000000
Bid Item Totai:
1.00 5,000.000000
Bid Item Total:
1.00 2,500.000000
1.00 7,500.000000
Exx Price Bid Price
14,820.00 14,820.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
200.00 200.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
1,200.00 1,200.00
150.00 150.00
100.OQ 100.00
5,650.00 5,650.00
2,100.00 2,100.00
2, l 00.00 2,100.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
6,200.00 6,200.00
5,000.00 5,000.00
S,000.OU 5,000.00
2,500.00 2,500.00
7,500.00 7,500.00
Bid Item Total:
Grand Total:
10,000.00 10,000.00
140,113.00 140,113.00
Report 9-5- - /2004
tom ~ Pa~of 3 ~ PM
11.16.1003
•
•
~r :~ ..
,..~`~
C,rs'
•
Town of Vail, Art in Public Places
Art Shack Renovation: Donations/Pledges
Ford Park
Vail, Colorado - .
~ADSIt~llg (~
Architecture: KH. Webb Architects
Structural Engineering: MJ Mueller
Approvals: Braun and Associates
fonstruction: Nedbo Conswction
M~erial List
Trash Removal: Honeywagon
Supervision: Nedbo Construction
General Demolition Nedbo Construction
Signage/Donation Plaque AIPP Board
Minor Nand Exavation work
Sand Pledged by Shane's Mountain Masonry
Brick Pavers +/-200 sq. ft. a8/sf Pledged by Shane's Mountain Masonry
Misc ground covers/shrubs/topsoil Pledged. by Greg Barrie @ TOY
Concrete/Gravel for new interior slab 420sf Pledged by Gallegos Masonry
Foundation Patch and Repair Pledged by Gallegos Masonry
Wood lf~x
Particle Board Plywood for walls 24 sheets
Interior Woad Trim for windows/doors IOOIf
Cedar Shingles for Root/Gables BOOsf Pledged by Plath Roofing
Rough Sawn Cedaz irim.2x6's 3001(
4" Cedar lap Siding TSOsf
2x4 Framing lumber 80 8'
8 x 12 RS Ridge Beam 28 L.F.
2 x 10 Roof Joists 44 12'
1x4 Ceiling Strips 120 14'
Rough Sawn fedaz Timbers for Trellis 12 2x8x10' 2 4x4x8'
Misc Framing fonnectors
Misc Fasteners
5/B" Plywood for Wall Sheathing 36sheets
'/~" Plywood for Roof Repairs 14sheets
36 2x8x10 / 18 2x8x16' for roof rafters & bottom cords
do red DOOr hems
New Windows to Match Existing: Eagle Windows: Already Arrived and paid for at discount
6 double hung I triple mull I fixed for gable
New French Doors 160x68
Lockset I ea
910.477.2990 y%~~x;. .~ :;t=~ www.kbwebb ram
1.11.2003
Town of Vail, Art in Public Places
Art Shack Renovation: Donations/Pledges
Ford Park
Vail, Colorado
Consulting Lisp
Architecture: KN. Webb Architects
Struaural Engineering. MJ Mueller
Approvals: Braun and Assoaates
Construction: Nedbo Construction
Material list:
General Conditions:
Trash Removal: Honeywagon
Supervision: Nedbo Conswction
General Demolition
Signage/Donation Plaque AIPP Board
Sitework Items:
Minor Hand Excavation work
Sand
Brick Pavers +/-200 sq. ft. $8/sf
Misc. ground covers/shrubs/topsoil Pledged by Greg Barrie ~ TOY
Concrete Items:
Concrete/Gravel for new interior slab 420sf
Foundation Patch and Repair
Wood Items:
Partide Board Plywood for walls 24 sheen
Interior Wood Trim for windows/doors IOOIf
Cedar shingles for Roof/Gables 800sf
Rough Sawn Cedar Trim 2x6's 3001(
4" Cedar lap Siding 750s(
2x4 Framing Lumher 30 8'
Rough Sawn Cedar Timbers (or Trellis 12 2x8x10' 2 4x4x8'
Misc Framing Connectors
Misc Fasteners
'/~" Plywood for Roof Repairs 24sheets
36 2x8x 10 / 18 2x8x 16' for roof rafters &
bottom cords
Windows and Door Items:
New Windows to Match Existing: Eagle Windows (At Cost per Kathy langenwalter)
6 double hung I triple mull I fixed for gable
New French Doors 160x68
lockset I ea .
Water & Weatherproofing_Items:
Waterproof Membrane (or Roof 600sf
R-19 Fiberglass Batt Insulation for Walls/Root 600sf root S40sf walls
Tyvek Exterior Moisture Barrier 1 roll
•
r
•
•
•
.-:.~ ..
~~
,~
•
.-:~:
Waterproof Membrane for Root 600sf Pledged by Platte Roofing
R-19 Fiberglass Batt Insulation for Walls/Roof 600sf roof 540s( walls
Tyvek Exterior Moisture Barrier I roll
3 mil. Interior Yapor Barrier 540sf
Metal Flashing.- - -Pledged by Platte Roofing_ ~ ~ -~
30# Asphaltic Felt Paper I roll
Ft~ee ~ ~oa~
Concrete Color Staining
420sf Pledged by Gallegos Masonry
Exterior Stain IO gal
Paint for wndows/Trim 2 ~
Sealer for Plywood Interior Walls 5 gal
Gypsum Board for Ceiling 600st
New Electrical 200 amp Service Panel TOY Staff Electricians
Interior/Exterior Oudets
Track or fable lighting & Fixtures
Exterior light Fixtures
Smoke 8 Heat Detection System
Phone Service
Electric Oil-Filled Baseboard Neaten ;50 a LF. Pledged by Nedbo
Exterior Hose Bib i0Y Staff '
Rough-in for future sink
470.417.2994 ?,. ......9:, www.kb+wedb.rvm
AIPP BUDGET 2004 •
REVENUE
RETT and operating fund 133,496 .
Manhole income 20,000*
Roll forward from 2003 34,213(confirmed 3/25/04)
Fundraising
Commissions '
Total available funds for 2004 187,214
EXPENSES
Salaries
salaries 31,356
benefits 11,915
Maintenance 9,000
Exuberance
Bird of Paradise
Seibert Circle
Temporary Exhibition Program 5,000 •
Brochure and printing
Graphic design
Artist expenses
Event or reception
Projects
*Village Streetscape (Wall Street) 50,000
*Pedestrian Bridge(autumn 2004) 25,000
Trash cans 1,000
Ford Park Art Shack ~ 30,000
Pirate Ship Park (Ty Gillespie design fee) 2,500
*Seibert Circle Design Study 10,000
East Meadow Drive (design and research fee) 2,500
Summer program (to be decided) 250
Front Door Project not funded
Checkpoint Charlie design not funded
Contingency 7753
Administration 1000
TOTAL 187,214
•
COIORBOARD~
ROOF & SIDIN
OLYMPIC - SE NSPARENT STAIN #920
sl ~ kfF:S m~~ ~Y V ~l~`
~.~ ,. ~ ~~
2 r-R'~Za,~
4 i
°, ~ ~
' 1 ' ~~,~
TRIM & TRELLIS ~ •~ ~+~ ~ F~ . ~. ~.~~,r~
OLYMPIC -SEMI-TRAN5PARENT STAIN #723
~f: -_
~-~.
REMOVE EXIST
VENT & INSTALL
NEW FIXED UVDW
NEW WD TRELLIS
CENTER PRIMARY
HORIZ SUPPORTS
ON EXIST WD
BAND AT BLDG -
PATCH & REPAIR
EXIST WD SIDING
6 TRIM
\t f .r
~....
Proposed South Elevation
.'
II
t
C ~'
y~y
6
~0
NEW WD ~ -a
SHINGLES TO ~ a~
MATCH EXISTING
i ~
i---NEW EXT LIGHT FIXTURES - ~ -
OLD CALIFORNIA LANTERN '
COMPANY, "SLITTER'S MILL" ~ .~
# 2-370-TB-FR
--REMOVE EXIST WDW & i
INSTALL NEW FRENCH DOORSi ~
`
~
^-~"MODIFY SITE FOR MAX 1:12 ~ ~
,' ~{. S OPE AWAY FROM BLDG
~~.
-PREVIOUS CONTOUR
SHOWN DASHED
NEW WD I.
i
I
;
SHINGLE ROOF x
Q
TO MATCH I
N ~~
EXISTING I N ~~
;?
C
C
I
--~-5
P
I
_. I
_ ~ ~-NEW WD SIDING ~~
11 °ilf 1: 1)11
I °uw~ n u
- 6 TRIM TO I °"'` """
~{ MATCH EXISTING ""10"'
'ilfpeyf 3:i(I
.. ;
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING
• GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
All applications must be submitted to the Town of Vail by Wed. July 31, 2002 by 5:00 P.M.. You must
provide 12 copies of.the application. Any application received after that date or any application packet
with fewer. than 11 copies will not be considered.
Please send application to:
Town of Vail
Penny Harpe, Accounting Tech.
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
For questions on the financial statements, please contact Penny Harpe at 479-2104.
PLEASE TYPE THIS APPLICATION OR PRINT IN BLACK INK
Name of organization: Vail Valley Community Television, Channel s
2• Contact person: Brian Hall
3• ~ Mailing address: P.O. Box 5600, Avon, CO 81658
• 4• Telephone: 970-926-5855
5• Members and Titles of your governing board: Brian Hall/President, Michael
Billingsly/Vice President, Kaylee Brennand/Sect-Treasurer, Mike Brown/Town of
Avon Rep, Kim Ruotolo/Town of Vail Rep, John Dakin/Community Rep, Annah
Scully/Community Rep
6• Amount of contribution requested: $10,000.00
7• Organization fiscal year-end: December 31
8. Are your books audited? No
9• How will the contribution be used? Equipment Upgrades and Replacement
10. How does your request support item 1C of the contribution policy? New and
upgraded equipment will increase the quality of the programming at Channel 5, Vail's
community access station.
11. Who currently funds your organization (other governments, private donations, user
fees, etc.)? Towns of Avon, Vail, and Mintum, in the form of a percentage of franchise
fees paid to the towns by Comcast; Program Sponsorships, Program Fees.
• 12. Organization's mission statement: Vail Valley Community Television exists to inform
the citizens of, foster debate within, and promote the community of Eagle County
Colorado.
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING
Balance Sheet
tractions: Round all fi es to the nearest dollar. Please resent in as much detail as possible. •
Ins gm' P
Most Recent Completed
Fiscal Year (Date: )
Assets: $ SEE ATTACHED
Total Assets $
•
Liabilities: $
Total Liabilities ~
Net Worth (Total Assets Minus Total
Liabilities) $
•
•
•
•
~:4a Pnn Vail Valley Community Television-Channel 5
05/20/04 Balance Sheet
accrual Basis As of December 31, 2003
ASSETS
Current Assets
Checking/Savings
Checking
Money Market/no transfer
Savings/transfer ok
Total Checking/Savings
Accounts Receivable
Accounrts Receivable
Total Accounts Receivable
Other Current Assets
Payroll Deposit
Total Other Current Assets
Dec 31, 03
~~~
3,973.20
12,437.80
3,875.12
~~~
20,286.12
2,792.36
.~_
2,792.36
-582.49
~~
-582.49
Total Current Assets
Fixed Assets
A/D -Equipment
A/D -Leasehold Improvements
Equipment
Studio ~ Leasehold Improvements
Total Fixed Assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES ~ EQUITY
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Total Accounts Payable
Other Current Liabilities
Payroll Liabilities
Total Other Current Liabilities
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Equity
Opening• Bal Equity
Operating Fund
Retained Earnings
Working Capital Fund
Net Income
Total Equity
TOTAL LIABILITIES ~ EQUITY
22,495.99
-132;510.04
-10,628.30
141,961.48
10,628.30
9,451.44
31,947.43
30.00
~~
30.00
1,470.21
~~
1,470.21
1,500.21
1,500.21
-4,232.27
-7,013.21
36,519.13
25,000.00
-19,826.43
30,447.22
~~
31,947.43
Page 1 of 1
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING •
Statement of Sources and Uses
Instructions: Round all figures to the nearest dollar. Please present as much detail as
possible.
Current Fiscal Year Budget
Revenues: $ SEE ATTACHED
(List by funding source)
•
Total Revenue ~
Expenses: $
Total Expenses ~
Total Revenue Minus Expense $
•
r° ~ 2:os PM Vail Valley Community Television-Channel 5
05/20/04 Profit ~ Loss Budget
accrual Basis January through December 2004
•
Ordinary IncomelExpense
Income
Capitol Improvement Grant
Contributions Income
Dubs
Franchise Fees
Avon
Mintum
Unincorporated
Vail
Total Franchise Fees
Production Services
Program Fees
Program Sponsorships
Uncategorized Income
Total Income
•
Expense
Advertising
Automobile Expense
Bank Service Charges
Capital Improvements
Dues and Subscriptions
Equipment Purchase
Insurance
Licenses and Permits
Payroll Expenses
Postage and Delivery
Professional Fees
Program Expense
Rent
Repairs
Salary Sr Wages
Supplies
Telephone
Travel 8 Ent
Utilities/Common Costs
Total Expense
Net Ordinary Income
• Net Income
Budget
~~~
10, 000.00
1,800.00
18,000.00
2,500.00
25,000.00
50,000.00
95,500.00
10,000.00
1,500.00
25,000.00
143~80~ 0
600.00
600.00
72.00
9,600.00
300.00
20,000.00
3,000.00
100.00
6,000.00
600.00
425.00
450.00
16,653.00
1,200.00
69,000.00
3,000.00
3, 000.00
1,200.00
8,000.00
143,800.00
~~
0.00
Page 1 of 1
~~ . ,
._,.~
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING
• GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
All applications must be submitted to the Town ofVail by Wed. July 3I, 2002 by 5:00 P.M.. You must
provide 12 copies of the application. Any application received after that date or any application packet
with fewer than 11 copies will not be considered.
Please send application to:
Town of Vail
Penny Harpe, Accounting Tech.
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
For questions on the financial statements, please contact Penny Harpe at 479-2104.
PLEASE TYPE THIS APPLICATION OR PRINT IN BLACK INK
Name of organization: Vail Valley Chamber & Tourism Bureau
2. Contact person: Katie Barnes
3. Mailing address: 100 E. Meadow Drive, Suite 34, Vail CO 81657
• 4. Telephone: 970-479-1046 x101
5. Members and Titles of your governing board:
Steve Pope- Chairman -Publisher Vail Daily
Brian Nolan- Vice Chairman -Owner The Blue Moose
Stan Cope- Secretary/ Treasurer -President -Lodge Tower
Bill Anderson -General Manager -Lion Square Lodge
Mike Brown -Avon Town Council
Scott Fulton -Avon Business Association
Tim Cochrane -Executive Director -Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce
Peggy Curry -Colorado Mountain College
Robert Dallain -General Manager -Park Hyatt Beaver Creek
Jim Feldhaus - VP Sales & Marketing -Colorado Mountain Express
John Garnsey -Chief Operating Officer -Beaver Creek
Ghiqui Hoffman -Laughing Monkey -Vail Chamber Business Association
Alan Holub - Minturn Business Association
Bill Jensen - Sr. VP & COO -Vail Resorts
Kent Logan -Vail Town Council
Arn Menconi -Eagle County Commissioner
Tony O'Rourke -Beaver Creek Resort Company
Tom Backhus -Owner - 4 Eagle Ranch
Sue Marquez -Edwards Business Association
Beth Slifer -Owner -Slifer Designs
• Joel Heath -President -Untraditional Marketing
6. Amount of contribution requested: 34 Blue Parking Passes
7. ~ Organization fiscal year-end: December 31, 2004
~l
h ~` E
1
3, Are your books audited? Yes - •
9, How will the contribution be used? Twenty five parking passes will be used to
continue_the Community Host Program through the summer of 2004 and the winter
season of 2004/2005. Nine pass2s0~ ommunity Host swill work 80 hours (32 hours
the construction penod of Fall
during the summer/fall and 48 hours in the winter) and will receive a Blue Parking
Pass or Vail/Beaver Creek Ski Pa ccommodate thisn The VVCTB will administer the
passes for ski passes in order to a
program, which includes hiring, and training the Hosts.
10. How does your request support item 1C of the contribution policy? The Community
Host Program supports the TOV's mission of being the premier mountain resort by
increasing the level of customer service throughout the town by offering friendly,
knowledgeable information to our guests and creating a seamless customer
experience from the streets of Vail to the ski mountain.
11. Who currently funds your organization (other governments, private donations, user
fees, etc.)? Membership dues and programs, commissions, co-op marketing
programs and publications, contributions and contracts for services fund the
VVCTB. •
12. Organization's mission statement: The VVCTB's mission is to improve the conditions
for business success. We do this by being THE organization dedicated to leading the
economic vitality of the community by:
a. Setting new standards for regional cooperation and collaboration among our
stakeholders, including area businesses, government entities and private
organizations.
b. Attracting and retaining customers
c. Partnering with area businesses to enhance their level of success.
We effectively operate through self-sustaining business and marketing programs and
financial partnerships with our valued stakeholders.
(If more room is needed to answer questions, please use the back of this page.)
~\
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING
Balance Sheet
-Instructions: Round all fi es to the nearest dollar. Please resent in as much detail as ossible.
gur p P
Most Recent Completed
Fiscal Year (Date: 12/31/2003 )
Assets:
Cash in banks -operating 146,111
Cash in banks -restricted 141,827
Accounts Receivable 239,516
Inventory 0
Prepaid Expenses 1,260
Total Current Assets $528,714
Property and Equipment:
Software and website costs 24,029
Furniture and equipment 317,932
Leasehold improvements 52,113
Less accumulated depreciation 309 52
Total Property and Equipment 84 547
•
Total Assets $613,261
Liabilities:
Accounts Payable 278,592
Line of credit payable 70,000
Advance deposits and related liabilities 81,004
Accrued payroll and payroll tax liabilities 46,818
Deferred revenue 228,433
Total Current Liabilities 704 847
Total Liabilities $704,847
Net Worth (Total Assets Minus Total
Liabilities) $(91,586)
•
~' ~~~,
•
APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING
Statement of Sources and Uses
nd all figures to the nearest dollar. Please present as much detail as
R
ou
Instructions:
possible. Current Fiscal Year Budget
Revenues:
Commissions 446,436
Contributions 75'000
Sponsorships 35,000
TOV Contract (Visitor Center) 162,375
Co-ops, advertising and guides 678,500
Membership dues 547,345
Handling and inspection fees 150,900
LMD admire fee 105,000
BC Marketing fund 244,848
Partner Programs 130,230
Merchandise and concession sales 25,986
Interest income 1,380 •
203
61
Other revenues ,
664,203
$ 2
Total Revenue ,
Expenses:
Personnel and related taxes
1,491,487
Co-op & guide expense 435,500
BC Marketing expense 187,848
Partner Program expense 77,050
Advertising, web, newsletters 67,743
Rent, utilities, equipment 76,055
Depreciation 34,011
Postage, phone, leased equipment 86,065
Professional fees 12,700
Operating supplies 19,360
Credit card fees & Res system 45,718
Property and sales taxes 3,575
Miscellaneous 49,387
Insurance 7'802
Travel & Entertainment 24,100
Total Expenses $ 2,618,401
Total Revenue Minus Expense $ 45,802
•
O,,~ice of the Town 1~Ianager
75 South Frontage Road
Yaif; Colorado 81657
970-479-21OS/Faz 97U-479-2157
Katie Barnes
Director of Visitor Services
Vail Valley Chamber & Tourism Bureau
100 E. Meadow Dr., Suite 34
Vail, CO 81657
Katie,
Thank you for making arrangements on such short notice to staff the community host
slots during the initial stages of the town's Village Streetscape construction. While we
had hoped to staff the positions through an extension of the WCTB community host
volunteers, we believe the public relations value of having paid hosts on hand during
April and May has served the community well and reinforced our commitment to help set
• the tone for other construction, projects over the next four years. Once the hosts have
completed their work, please forward an invoice for this additional staffing, estimated at
$8,678 for the period April 19 to June 17, to my attention at the town.
In the meantime, now that we have a larger planning window for recruitment, we're
hoping that an expansion of your volunteer host program will be established for the fall
construction season in the Village, which runs Sept. 7 to Nov. 20. It is my understanding
the Town Council will be considering your request for nine additional blue parking
passes to facilitate this additional staffing as we conclude year-one of the streetscape
construction. We will be recommending Council approval of the additional passes as an
alternative to paying the hourly rate of $12.80, per the current arrangement.
I look forward to continuing our partnership with you in evaluating future construction
host needs for 2005 and beyond.
rely,
Information Officer
cc: Vail Town Council
• Stan Zemler
Greg Hall
Scott Bluhm
~~,• RECYCLEDPAPER
May 26, 2004 ~`
Yampah Builders Inc.
715 Grand Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-379-5222 fax 970-945-4092
ESZ'Il1~IATE
FOR BUDGET PURPOSES ONLY
May 26, 2004
Attn. John Gallegos
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
RE: A.D.A. Upgrades
WE are pleased to submit a preliminary estimate for the Town of Vail and Vail Recreation
District A.D.A. upgrades
• Our estimate is based on the following documents:
Deparnnent of Justice Written Report
'A.D.A. Manual of Acts and Relevant Regulations 1999 Edition
We have walked through the facilities and are familiar with the proposed changes that are
required. All areas should be revisited prior to construction to clarify ambiguities in the
"Standards".
A "Lump Sum" or "Cost plus" format is available. We will work with the Town of Vail
Administration to find what is best for cost and schedule.
NOTE, As of 6:00 P.M. 5/26/04, we have not received the "Standards" book from Mr.
Brooks Singer, Dept. of Justice. This was to be Fed-Ex'd to us on 5/25/04
Our ESTIMATE for the Town of Vail Facilities upgrade is $ 116,822.00
Our ESTIMATE for the Vail Recreation District upgrade is $254,724.00
Respec s bmitted,
,;,
V' 'Ray ward, Pres.
Yampah Builders Inc.
•
°t
• MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: June 1, 2004
SUBJECT: Proposed text amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code, to amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulations in
the Hillside Residential (HR), Single-Family Residential (SFR), Two-
Family Residential (R), Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS),
Residential Cluster (RC), Low Density Multiple-Family (LDMF), Medium
Density Multiple-Family (MDMF), High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF),
and Housing (H) districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vicki Pearson, et. al.
Planner: Bill Gibson
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
First reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series. of 2004, an ordinance amending Title
• 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, to amend the Gross Residential Floor
Area (GRFA) regulations in the Single-Family Residential (SFR), Two-Family
Residential ' (R), and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) zone
districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
II. BACKGROUND
Since the Town Council's last meeting the Town Staff has been further
evaluating methods for deducting basements from the GRFA calculations. The
Council had previously reviewed a graduated basement deduction methodology
based upon the ratio of exposed/unexposed exterior surface wall areas. At the
May 18, 2004, meeting of the Town Council determined that this methodology
would- be too cumbersome to implement and directed Staff to prepare language
for a graduated basement deduction based upon the linear distance of a
building's perimeter that is exposed/unexposed. This language has been
integrated into the attached Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004. As stated in
previous memorandums, the Town Staff has concerns about the complexity of
administering a graduated basement deduction policy. The Staff believes that a
whole basement deduction policy more efficiently achieves the policy goal of "not
counting basements as GRFA" (i.e. if a portion of a building meets the definition
of a "basement" it is simply not included in the GRFA calculations).
.Additionally, at the May 18, 2004, meeting the Town Council directed Staff to
prepare an ordinance amending the GRFA regulations for only the Single-Family
• Residential, Two-Family Residential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary c
Residential Districts. The Council unanimously voiced its support for the general
GRFA amendment policies being applied to the higher density residential
districts, but expressed concerns about the unintended consequences of these
amendments in multiple-family situations and expressed a desire to further
1
discuss these issues at a future meeting.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
The following is a summary of the Staffs analysis of the pro's and con's
associated with the graduated and whole basement deduction methods:
Graduated Basement Deduction
Pro's
• The GRFA deductions directly correlate to how much of a
basement is located below-grade.
• A graduated basement deduction allows for additional
development potential, with that new potential theoretically being
located below grade.
• Numerous homes may be eligible for some form of a graduated
basement deduction.
Con's
• A graduated basement deduction will require applicants to submit
plans with additional and different information than is currently
required by the Town (ex, topographic land surveys, floor plans
with overlays of FFE above, floor plans with overlays of
topographic information, cross-section drawings, floor plans with
overlays of reflected ceiling elevations, etc.)
• A graduated basement deduction will be very difficult to
administer, will slow the Town's review process, may create
decreased customer service, and may create the need for
additional staff resources.
• A graduated basement deduction will be very difficult to enforce.
• A graduated basement deduction does not close the crawlspace
loop-holes of the current GRFA regulations.
• A graduated basement deduction method creates an incentive to
build excess crawlspaces for future illegal conversions~to GRFA.
• Other GRFA deductions (ex. crawlspaces and garages) in the
basement will mean the graduated basement deduction
percentage will not reflect the actual floor area being deducted.
• Any landscaping that affects site grading will require extensive
Town review to ensure compliance with the GRFA calculations.
• Topographic Improvement Location Certificates prepared by a
licensed land surveyor will be required for all new construction, all
landscaping, and most remodels.
• A graduated basement deduction does not "keep the Town out of
the inside of people's homes". The floor area uses within a
basement will continue to be closely regulated by the Town (ex.
crawlspace converted to livable space).
• A graduated basement deduction will create. a significant margin
of error in the GRFA calculations, in the 10's to 100's'of square
feet for a residence, because of the margins of error associated
with interpolating (i.e. estimating) grades and the margins of error
associated with the standard 2 foot contours of a topographic land
survey when calculating an exact deduction ratio (ex. a 2%
•
C~
2
• change in the graduated basement deduction on a 25,000 sq. ft.
Primary/Secondary lot could create a 100 sq. ft. difference in the
GRFA calculations).... This margin of -error will affect all graduated
basement deductions.
• A graduated basement deduction may create justification for a
GRFA variance based upon the unique physical characteristics of
a lot (i.e. water table, bedrock, slopes, etc.).
• A graduated basement deduction creates an incentive for
applicants to over excavate a site to creating more below-grade
structure so as to capture more GRFA.
• A graduated basement deduction may create controversy over the
distribution of GRFA between attached dwelling units (ex. dividing
the deduction between duplex owners when one unit is
proportionally more below-grade than the other).
• A graduated basement deduction for only one level of a building
will prevent an applicant from creating a new lower basement
level, since the existing basement level will then no longer include
a GRFA deduction.
• Graduated basement deductions may be granted for small
amounts of below-grade floor area (ex. 1 %, 5%, 9% etc.) which do
not meet the policy intent of "not counting basements" as GRFA.
Whole Basement Deduction
• Pro's
• A whole basement deduction will allow for additional development
potential, with that new potential theoretically being located below
grade.
• The "basement" definition of a whole basement deduction will be
similar to the building code requirements for determining a
building story.
• Fewer homes may be eligible for a whole basement deduction
than the graduated basement deduction; however, the deduction
will only be granted for true basements, thus meeting the intent of
the policy.
• A whole basement deduction will close the "above-grade"
crawlspace loop-hole of the current GRFA regulations.
• A whole basement deduction method will not create an incentive
to build excess crawlspaces for future illegal conversions to
GRFA.
• A whole basement deduction will be much easier to enforce than a
graduated basement deduction.
• A whole basement deduction will "keep the Town out of the inside
of people's homes". Changes to the floor area uses within a
basement will not be reviewed for GRFA compliance by the Town
(ex. crawlspace being converted to livable space).
• A whole basement deduction will only create a small margin of
• ~ error in the GRFA calculations due to interpolation (i.e. estimating)
of grades and the margins of error associated with the standard 2
foot contours of a topographic land survey. These margins of
error will only affect those buildings on the edge of the
3
basement/not a basement determination. •
Con's o
• ~ A graduated basement deduction will require applicants to submit
plans with additional and different information than is currently
required by the Town (ex. topographic land surveys, floor plans
with overlays of FFE above, floor plans with overlays of
topographic information, cross-section drawings, floor plans with
overlays of reflected ceiling elevations, etc.)
• A whole basement deduction policy will be difficult to administer;
but to a lesser degree than a graduated basement deduction
policy.
• Landscaping that affects site grading may require Town review to
ensure compliance with the GRFA calculations; but to a lesser
degree than a graduated basement deduction policy.
• Topographic Improvement Location Certificates prepared by a
licensed land surveyor will be required for some new construction,
landscaping, and remodels; but far fewer than will be required for
a graduated basement deduction policy.
• If a building code type basement definition is used, multiple levels
of a home may be eligible for a whole basement deduction.
• A whole basement deduction may create justification for a GRFA
variance based upon the unique physical characteristics of a lot
(i.e. water table, bedrock, slopes, etc:).
• A whole basement deduction creates an incentive for applicants to •
over excavate a site to creating more below-grade structure, but
only to the degree where compliance with the "basement"
definition is met.
• A whole basement deduction 'may create controversy over the
distribution of GRFA between attached dwelling units (ex. dividing
the deduction between duplex owners); but to a far lesser extent
than a graduated basement deduction since the Town will not be
regulating the floor uses of basements (ex. converting a
crawlspace to livable area).
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council
approves, with modifications, Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, on first
reading to amend the Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) regulations in the
Single-Family Residential (SFR), Two-Family Residential (R), and Two-Family
Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) districts, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004,
on first reading, the Community Development Department also recommends the
Town Council makes the following findings:
!~ 1. That the amendment is consistent with the applicable elements of the
adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail •
Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development
objectives of the Town; and
4
• 2. That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the
Zoning Regulations; and
3. That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious
development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances
its natural environment and its established character as a resort and
residential community of the highest quality.
Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004,
on first reading, the Community Development Department .recommends the
following modification:
1. The graduated basement deduction language found in Section 8 of
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, be substituted with a whole
basement deduction policy as follows:
...except the horizontal areas of a structure as set forth herein shall
then be deducted from the calculation of GRFA:
f. Basements: that floor level of a structure where the. finished floor
elevation of the level above is both:
• 1. Not more than 6 feet above the lesser of the adjacent
existing, finished, or interpolated grades for more than
50 percent of the structure perimeter.
2. Not more than 12 feet above the lesser of the adjacent
existing, finished, or interpolated grades at any point
along the structure perimeter.
V. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment B:
Attachment A: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004
•
5
2. That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the •
Zoning Regulations; and
3. That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious
development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances
its natural environment and its established character as a resort and
residential community of the highest quality.
Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004,
on first reading, the Community Development Department recommends the
following modification:
1. The graduated basement deduction language found in Section 8 of
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004, be substituted with a whole
basement deduction policy as follows:
...except the horizontal areas of a structure as set forth herein shall
then be deducted from the calculation of GRFA:
f. Basements: that floor level of a sfructure where the finished floor
elevation of the level above is both:
1. Not more than 6 feet above the lesser of the adjacent
existing, finished, or interpolated grades for more than
50 percent of the structure perimeter.
2. Not more than 72 feet above the lesser of the adjacent
existing, finished, or interpolated grades at any point
along the structure perimeter.
V. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Example Basement Deduction Methods
Attachment B: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004
•
5
Attachment: A
•
GRADUATED BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES
•
F
E
deduction: p ~
Floor Plan
•
deduction: / Ob 9;
~2~
•-•• Floor Plan
~Z•
~Z~
[p~
•
E
GRADUATED BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES
~Z~
deduction: N 3 9
~2~
H
Floor Plan
H
~2•
LZ~
deduction:~•3 q 6/d 1
L1
f-~
Floor Plan
cZi
•
•
•
WHOLE BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES
s6' to FFE for >50%: yes_ no_
_<12' any point: yes ~ no_
basement deduction: yeses no_
•
E
f
t 6'
Floor Plan
6~
sb'
~ G'
s6' to FFE for a50%: yes_ no /
s12' any point: yes no_
basement deduction: yes_ no
r
E
Floor Plan
•
E
E
WHOLE BASEMENT DEDUCTION EXAMPLES
S~~
t--
~--~
t (o~
56' to FFE for ?50%: yes / no_
<_12' any point: yes_ no
basement deduction: yes_ no~
s~'
(mob
Floor Plan
~S ~~
<_6' to FFE for ?50%: yes_ no~
_<12' any point: yes_ no~
basement deduction: yes_ no~
~'
6
Floor Plan
•
r
Attachment: B
• ORDINANCE NO. 10
Series of 2004
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12 (ZONING REGULATIONS), VAIL TOWN CODE, TO
AMEND THE GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA) REGULATIONS IN THE SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR), TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R), AND TWO-FAMILY
PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL (PS) ZONE DISTRICTS AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN REGARDS THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has held
public hearings on the proposed amendments in accordance with the provisions of the Town
Code of the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds that the proposed
amendments further the development objectives of the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has
recommended approval of this text amendment at its September 8, 2003, meeting, and has
• submitted its recommendation to the Town Council• and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the amendments are consistent with the
applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail
Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and
WHEREAS, the Vait Town Council finds that the amendments further the general and
specific purposes of the zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the amendments promote the health,
safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promote the coordinated and harmonious
development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment
and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality.
•
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF •
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Section 12-2-2 (Definitions) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be
amended as follows:
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#+sk~. Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
FLOOR AREA, GROSS RESIDENTIAL (GRFA):
•, ,
snc~;,,,.~ , .,~ ~+o~ ,.,,a „+tie.- ~;.~,;~~~ ,.,~i~ f..,~tio~,. Refer to chapter 15 of this title for
GRFA definitions, regulations, and requirements for GRFA calculation.
SITE: See "Lot"
SITE COVERAGE: The ratio of the. total building area of a site to the total area of a site,
expressed as a percentage. For the purposes of this definition, "building area of a site" shall
mean that portion of a site occupied by any building, carport, porte cochere, arcade, and •
covered or roofed walkway constructed at, below, or above grade as measured from the
exterior face of the perimeter walls or supporting columns.
For the purposes of this definition, a balcony or deck projecting from a higher elevation may
extend over a lower balcony, deck or walkway, and in such case the higher balcony or deck
shall not be deemed a roof or covering for the lower balcony, deck or walkway. In addition
to the above, building area shall also include any portion of a roof overhang, eaves, or
covered stair, covered deck, covered porch, covered terrace or covered patio that extends
more than four feet (4') from the exterior face of the perimeter building walls or supporting
columns.
Section 2. Section.12-66-8B (Single=Family Residential District, Density Control) of
the Vail Town Code shall hereby be repealed and amended with the following:
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as ~+r Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
B. Gross Residential Floor Area:
1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on
•
each site:
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 2
•
a. Not more than forty (40) square feet of gross residential
floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of
the first ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus
b. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in
excess of ten thousand (10,000) square feet
3. No single-family residential lot except those located entirely in the red
hazard avalanche zone or the flood plain shall be so restricted that it
• cannot be occupied by one single-family dwelling.
Section 3. Section 12-6C-8B (Two-Family Residential District, Density Control) of
the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows:
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#isker~. Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
B. Gross Residential Floor Area:
1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on
each site:
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 3
r~
-' pGnvnvr~°. h~ mrlror) /1 rl(1\ qrn i.+ro fovi of cifo •+rn~ in nvroce nf_fhirht
~ i ~
s
a. Not more than forfy six (46) square feet of gross residential
floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of
the first ten thousand (10,000) square feet of site area; plus
b. Thirty eighi(38) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area
over ten thousand (10,000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen
thousand (15,000) square feet of site area; plus
c. Thirteen(13) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area
over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, not exceeding
thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of site area; plus
d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA)
for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess
of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet.
•
dw~ing--~+e+~
Section 4. Section 12-6D-8 (Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential District
Density Control) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows:
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as st~+sken. Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
B. Gross Residential Floor Area:
1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on
each site:
F~ Ton /'1(11 cniroro foof of nrnecso~ii-lonfi~+l flnnr r+ro~ /(=C?C41 fnr • .
/ `1 ~ ~ ~
p~n~TG h~ inrlrni-I /1(1(11 cn~ i'+ro fool of ciao ~ro~ nvor fiftoon
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 4
a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential
floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of
the first ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus
b. Thirty eight(38) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area
over ten thousand (10,000) square feed not exceeding fifteen
thousand (15,000) square feet of site area; plus
c. Thirteen(13) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area
over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feed not exceeding
thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of site area; plus
d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA)
for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess
of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet.
e. The secondary unit shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of
the allowable GRFA.
Section 5. Section 12-10-10B (Parking Requirement, Schedule B) of the Vail Town
Code shall hereby be amended as follows:
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#~isker~. Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
Use Parking Requirement
9v~efliag-~+t
le: s: 1.5 sPaees$eF-u~
•
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 cJ
•
Single-Family and /f the unit's gross residential floor area is Two-
Two-Family Structures less than 2,000 square feet: 2 spaces per unit
(including EHUs)
If the unit's gross residential floor area is 2,000
square feet or more, but less than 4,000 square
feet: 3 spaces per unit
If the unit's gross residential floor area is 4,000
square feet or more, but less than 5,500 square
feet: 4 spaces per unit
If the unit's gross residential floor area is 5,500
square feet or more: 5 spaces per unit
Multiple-Family and If the unit's gross residential floorarea and Mixed-
Mixed-Use is 500 square feet or less: 1.5 spaces per unit
Structures
(including EHUs) If the unit's gross residential floor area is more
than 500 square, but less than 2,000 square feet:
2 spaces per unit
!f the unit's gross residential floor area is 2,000
square feet or more: 2.5 spaces per unit
Section 6. Section 12-13-4 (EHU Requirements by Type) of the-Vail Town Code
shall hereby be amended as follows:
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as strisl~er~. Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
EHU Additional GRFA
Type I The EHU is entitled to an additional ~ 550 sq. ft.
Type II The EHU is entitled to an additional ~ 550 sq. ft
•
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 6
Section 7. Section 12-15-2 (GRFA REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE DISTRICT) of the
•
Vail Town Code shall be repealed and hereby re-enacted as follows:
Zone Districts GRFA Ratio GRFA Credits (Added to results of
application of percentage
Hillside Residential .20 of site x21,780 sq. ft., plus 425 sq. ft. per allowable dwelling unit
(HR) .05 of site area >21,780 sq. ft.
Single-Family .40 of site area x10,000 sq. ft., plus None
Residential (SFR) .13 of site area >10,000 sq. ft.
Two-Family .46 of site area <_10,000 sq. ft., plus None
Residential (R) .38 of site area >10,000 and <_15,000 sq. ft.,
plus
.13 of site area >15,000 and 530,000 sq. ft.,
plus
.06 of site area >30,000 sq. ft.
Two-Family .46 of site area <_10,000 sq. ft., plus None
Primary/Secondary .38 of site area >10,000 and <_15,000 sq. ft.,
(P/S) Residential plus
.13 of site area >15,000 and _<30,000 sq. ft.,
plus
.06 of site area >30,000 sq. ft.
(the secondary unit shall not exceed 40% of the
allowable GRFA)
Residential Cluster .25 of buildable area 225 sq.ft. for single-family and two-family
(RC) structures only
Low Density Multiple .30 of buildable area 225 sq.ft. for single-family and two-family
Family (LDMF) structures only
Medium Density .35 of buildable area 225 sq.ft. for single-family and two-family
Multiple-Family structures only
(MDMF)
High Density .60 of buildable area None
Multiple-Family
(HDMF)
Housing (H) Per Planning and Environmental Commission None
approval
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 7
Public .80 of buildable area None
Accommodation
. _..
(PA)
Commercial Core 1 .80 of buildable area None
(CC1)
Commercial Core 2 .80 of buildable area None
(CC2)
Commercial Core 3 .30 of buildable area None
(CC3)
Commercial Service .40 of buildable area None
Center (CSC)
(GRFA shall not exceed 50% of the total
building floor area on an site
Arterial Business .60 of buildable area None
(ABD)
Heavy Service (HS) None permitted None
Lionshead Mixed 2.5 of buildable area None
Use 1 (LMU-1)
2.5 of buildable area
Lionshead Mixed None
Use 2 (LMU-2)
Agriculture and 2,000 square feet None
Open Space (A)
Outdoor Recreation None permitted None
(OR)
Parking (P) None permitted None
General Use (GU) Per Planning and Environmental Commission None
approval
Natural Area None permitted None
Preservation (NAP)
•
•
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004
Ski Base/Recreation Per Town Council approval None
(SBR)
Special Per underlying zoning or per development plan None
Development approval by Town Council
Districts (SDD)
Ski Base/Recreation Per Planning and Environmental Commission None
2 (SBR2) approval
Section 8. Section 12-15-3 (GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA; DEFINITION,
CALCULATION, AND EXCLUSION) of the Vail Town Code shall be repealed and hereby re-
enacted as follows:
A. Within the Single-Family Residential, Two-Family Residential, and Two-Family
Primary/Secondary Residential Districts:
1. Definition, Calculation and Deductions:
• Gross Residential FloorArea Defined: For residential uses, the total square
• footage of all horizontal areas on all levels of a structure, as measured to
the outside face of the sheathing of the exterior walls (i.e., not including
exterior wall finishes). Floor area shall include, but not be limited to,
elevator shafts and stairwells at each level, lofts, fireplaces, bay windows,
mechanical spaces, vents and chases, storage areas, and other similar
areas. Garages; attics; vaulted or open to below spaces; basements;
crawlspaces; and roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces, or patios shall
be included as floor area; except the horizontal areas of a structure as set
forth herein shall then be deducted from the calculation of GRFA:
a. Enclosed garage areas of up to three hundred (300) square feet
per vehicle space not exceeding a maximum of two (2) vehicle
parking spaces for each allowable dwelling unit permitted by this
title.
Garage area deducted from floor area is awarded on a "per space
basis" and shall be contiguous to a vehicular parking space. Each
vehicular parking space shall be designed with direct and
unobstructed vehicular access.
Alcoves, storage areas, and mechanical areas which are located in a
garage and which are twenty five percent (25%) or more open to the
garage area may be included in the garage area deduction.
• Interior walls separating the garage from other areas of a structure
may be included in the garage area deduction.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 9
b. Attic areas with a ceiling height of five feet (5') or less, as
measured from the top side of the structural members of the floor to
the underside of the structural members of the roof directly above.
c. Attic areas created by construction of a roof with structural truss-
type members, provided the trusses are spaced no greater than
thirty inches (30") apart.
d. Attic areas created by construction of a roof structure utilizing a
nontruss system, with spaces greater than five feet (5') in height, if
all of the following criteria are met:
(1) The area cannot be accessed directly from a habitable
area within the same building level; and
(2) The area shall have only the. minimum access required by
the building code from the level below; and
(3) The attic space shall not have a structural floor capable of
supporting a "live load" greater than forty (40) pounds per
square foot, and the "floor" of the attic space shall not be.
improved with decking; and'
(4) It must be demonstrated by the architect that a "truss-
type" or similar structural system cannot be utilized as
defined in the definition of floor area; and
(5) It will be necessary that a structural element (i.e., collar-
tie) be utilized when rafters are used for the roof system. In
an unusual situation, such as when a bearing ridge system is
used, the staff will review the space for compliance with this
policy.
e. Crawlspaces accessible through an opening not greater than
twelve (12) square feet in area, with five feet (5') or less of ceiling
height, as measured from the surface of the earth to the
underside of structural floor members of the floor/ceiling assembly
above.
f. Basements: That part of a structure's lowest level which is
located below-grade and deducted from GRFA. For the purposes
of calculating GRFA, the total proportion of the lowest level's
exterior wall perimeter located below grade (as measured twenty-
four inches (24") below the finished floor elevation of the level
above; to the lesser of the adjacent existing, finished, or
interpolated grades) shall be the proportion of the horizontal area
of that lowest level deducted from the GRFA calculations.
g. Vaulted Spaces: Any interior space with afloor-to-ceiling height
greater than fifteen feet (15'), as measured from the finished floor to
the underside of the structural members of the floor/ceiling assembly
above, shall be counted as GRFA on two levels of a structure.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 ~ 0
• h. Roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces, patios or similar
features or spaces with no more than three (3) exterior walls and a
minimum opening of not less.than twenty five percent (25%) of the
lineal perimeter of the area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or
similar feature or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully
open from floor to ceiling, with an allowance for a railing of up to forty
four inches (44") in height and support posts with a diameter of
eighteen inches (18") or less which are spaced no closer than ten
feet (10') apart. The space between the posts shall be measured
from the outer surface of the post.
2. Additional Calculation Provisions:
a. Common Interior Party Walls: Where multiple dwelling units exist
within one structure, GRFA shall be measured for each dwelling unit
from the center of common interior party walls to the outside face of
the sheathing of the exterior walls.
b. Greenhouse Windows: Greenhouse windows (self-supporting
windows) shall not be counted as GRFA. "Greenhouse windows" are
defined according to the following criteria:
1. Distance Above Inside Floor Level: In order for a window
• to be considered a greenhouse window, a minimum distance
of thirty six inches (36") must be provided between the
bottom of the window and the floor surface, as measured on
the inside face of the building wall. (Floor surface shall not
include steps necessary to meet building code egress
requirements.) The thirty six inch (36")minimum was chosen
because it locates the window too high to be comfortably
used as a window seat and because it allows for a typical
four foot (4') high greenhouse window to be used in a room
with an eight foot (8') ceiling height.
2. Projection: No greenhouse window may protrude more
than eighteen inches (18") from the exterior surface of the
building. This distance allows for adequate relief for
appearance purposes, without substantially adding to the
mass and bulk of the building.
3. Construction Characteristics: All greenhouse windows
shall be self-supporting and shall not require special framing
or construction methods for support, with the exception that
brackets below the window may be allowed provided they die
into the wall of the building at a forty five degree (45°) angle.
A small roof over the window may also be allowed provided
• the overhang is limited to four inches (4")beyond the window
plane.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 ~ 1
4. Dimensional Requirement: No greenhouse window shall •
have a total window surface area greater than forty four (44)
square feet. This figure was derived on the assumption that
the maximum height of a window, in an average sized room,
is four feet (4') and the maximum width for a four foot (4')
high self-supporting window is between six feet (6') and eight
feet (8') (approximately 32 square feet). Since the window
would protrude no more than eighteen inches (18"), the
addition of side windows would bring the overall window area
to approximately forty four (44) square feet.
5. Quantity: Up to two (2) greenhouse windows will be
allowed per dwelling unit, however, the forty four (44) square
foot size limitation will apply to the combined area of the two
(2) windows.
6. Site Coverage: Greenhouse windows do not count as site
coverage.
c. In the Two-Family and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Districts,
GRFA is calculated based on the entire site area.
B. Within all districts except the Single-Family Residential, Two-Family .
Residential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Districts:
1. Gross Residential Floor Area Defined: The total square footage of all
levels of a building, as measured at the inside face of the exterior walls
(i.e., not including furring, Sheetrock, plaster and other similar wall
finishes). GRFA shall include, but not be limited to, elevator shafts and
stairwells at each level, lofts, fireplaces, bay windows, mechanical
chases, vents, and storage areas. Attics, crawlspaces and roofed or
covered decks, porches, terraces or patios shall also be included in
GRFA, unless they meet the following provisions:
b. Within buildings containing two (2) or fewer dwelling units, the
following areas shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA.
GRFA shall be calculated by measuring the total square footage
of a building as set forth in the definition above. Excluded areas
as set forth herein, shall then be deducted from total square
footage:
1: Enclosed garages of up to three hundred (300) square
feet per vehicle space not exceeding a maximum of two
(2) spaces for each allowable dwelling unit permitted by
this title.
2. Attic space with a ceiling height of five feet (5') or less,
as measured from the top side of the structural members
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 12
• of the floor to the underside of the structural members of
the roof directly above. Attic area created by construction
_ _. __.. of a roof with truss-type-members will be excluded from
calculation as GRFA, provided the trusses are spaced no
greater than thirty inches (30") apart.
3. Crawlspaces accessible through an opening not greater
than twelve (12) square feet in area, with five feet (5') or
less of ceiling height, as measured from the surface of the
earth to the underside of structural floor members of the
floor/ceiling assembly above.
4. Roofed or covered deck, porches, terraces, patios or
similar features or spaces with no more than three (3)
exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than
twenty five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the
area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature
or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully
open from floor to ceiling with an allowance for a railing of
up to forty, four inches (44'`) in height.
b. Within buildings containing more than two (2) allowable
dwellings or accommodation units, the following additional areas
• shall be excluded from calculation as GRFA. GRFA shall be
calculated by.measuring the total square footage of a building as
set forth herein. Excluded areas as set forth shall then be
deducted from the total square footage:
1. Enclosed garages to accommodate on-site parking
requirements.
2. All or part of the following spaces, provided such spaces
are common spaces:
(a) Common hallways, stairways, elevator shafts and air
locks.
(b) Common lobby areas.
(c) Common enclosed recreation facilities.
(d) Common heating, cooling or ventilation systems, solar
rock storage areas, or other mechanical systems.
(e) Common closet and storage areas, providing access to
such areas is from common hallways only.
(f) Meeting and convention facilities.
(g) Office space, provided such space is used exclusively
for the management and operation of on-site facilities.
(h) Floor area to be used in a type III "employee housing
unit (EHU)" as defined and restricted by chapter 13 of this
• title.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 .~ 3
3. All or part of an air lock within an accommodation or •
dwelling unit not exceeding a maximum of twenty. five (25)
square feet, providing such unit has direct access to the
outdoors.
4. Overlapping stairways within an accommodation unit or
dwelling unit shall only be counted at the lowest level.
5. Attic space with a ceiling height of five feet (5') or less,
as measured from the top side of the structural members
of the floor to the underside of the structural members of
the roof directly above. Attic areas created by construction
of a roof with truss-type members will be excluded from
calculation as GRFA, provided the trusses are spaced no
greater than thirty inches (30")apart.
6. Crawlspaces accessible through an opening not greater
than twelve (12) square feet in area, with five feet (5') or
less of ceiling height, as measured from the surface of the
earth to the underside of structural floor members of the
floor/ceiling assembly above.
7. Roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces, patios or •
similar features or spaces with no more than three (3)
exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less than
twenty five percent (25%) of the lineal perimeter of the
area of said deck, porch, terrace, patio, or similar feature
or space, provided the opening is contiguous and fully
open from floor to ceiling, with an allowance for a railing of
up to forty four inches (44") in height and support posts
with a diameter of eighteen inches (18") or less which are
spaced no closer than ten feet (10') apart. The space
between the posts shall be measured from the outer
surface of the post.
2. Additional Calculation Provisions:
a. Walls: Interior walls are included in GRFA calculations. For two-
familyand primary/secondary structures, common party walls
shall be considered exterior walls.
b. Greenhouse Windows: Greenhouse windows (self-supporting
windows) shall not be counted as GRFA. "Greenhouse windows"
are defined according to the following criteria:
1. Distance Above Inside Floor Level: In order for a
window to be considered a greenhouse window, a •
minimum distance of thirty six inches (36") must be
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 14
• provided between the bottom of the window and the floor
surface, as measured on the inside face of the building
wall. (Floor surface sha{I-not include steps necessary to
meet building code egress requirements.) The thirty six
inch (36") minimum was chosen because it locates the
window too high to be comfortably used as a window seat
and because it allows for a typical four foot (4') high
greenhouse window to be used in a room with an eight
foot (8') ceiling height.
2. Projection: No greenhouse window may protrude more
than eighteen inches (18")from the exterior surface of the
building. This distance allows for adequate relief for
appearance purposes, without substantially adding to the
mass and bulk of the building.
3. Construction Characteristics: All greenhouse windows
shall be self-supporting and shall not require special
framing or construction methods for support, with the
exception that brackets below the window may be allowed
provided they die into the wall of the building at a forty five
degree (45°) angle. A small roof over the window may also
• be allowed provided the overhang is limited to four inches
(4") beyond the window plane.
4. Dimensional Requirement: No greenhouse window shall
have a total window surface area greater than forty four
(44) square feet. This figure was derived on the
assumption that the maximum height of a window, in an
average sized room, is four feet (4') and the maximum
width for a four foot (4') high self-supporting window is
between six feet (6') and eight feet (8') (approximately 32
square feet). Since the window would protrude no more
than eighteen inches (18"), the addition of side windows
would bring the overall window area to approximately forty
four (44) square feet.
5. Quantity: Up to two (2) greenhouse windows will be
allowed per dwelling unit, however, the forty four (44)
square foot size limitation will apply to the combined area
of the two (2) windows.
6. Site Coverage: Greenhouse windows do not count as
site coverage.
c. Vaulted Spaces: Vaulted spaces and areas "open to below" are
c
not included in GRFA calculations.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 15
d. Garage Credit: •
1. Allowable garage area is awarded on a ''per space
basis", with a maximum of two (2) spaces per allowable
unit. Each garage space shall be designed with direct and
unobstructed vehicular access. All floor area included in
the garage credit shall be contiguous to a vehicular space.
2. Alcoves, storage areas, and mechanical areas which
are located in the garage and which are twenty five
percent (25%) or more open to the garage area shall be
included as garage credit.
3. Garage space in excess of the allowable garage credit
shall be counted as GRFA.
e. Crawl And Attic Space:
1. Crawlspaces created by a "stepped foundation", hazard
mitigation, or other similar engineering requirement that
has a total height in excess of five feet (5') may be
excluded from GRFA calculations at the discretion of the
administrator. •
2. If a roof structure is designed utilizing a nontruss
system, and spaces greater than five feet (5') in height
result, these areas shall not be counted as GRFA if all of
the following criteria are met:
(a) The area cannot be accessed directly from a
habitable area within the same building level;
(b) The area shall have the minimum access
required by the building code from the level below
(6 square foot opening maximum);
(c) The attic space shall not have a structural floor
capable of supporting a "live load" greater than
forty (40) pounds per square foot, and the "floor" of
the attic space cannot be improved with decking;
(d) It must be demonstrated by the architect that a
"truss type" or similar structural system cannot be
utilized as defined in the definition of GRFA; and ~
(e) It will be necessary that a structural element
(i.e., collar-tie) be utilized when rafters are used for
the roof system. In an unusual situation, such as
when a bearing ridge system is used, the staff will
review the space for compliance with this policy.
•
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 16
• Section 9. Subsection 12-15-4B (INTERIOR CONVERSIONS) of the Vail Town
Code shall hereby be~amended as follows: -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- -. -~ - - - --
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#+slEe~. Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
B. Applicability: Within all zone districts except the Single-Family Residential, Two-
FamilyResidential, and Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Districts,
dwelling units that meet or
exceed allowable GRFA will be eligible to make interior conversions provided the
following criteria are satisfied:
1. Any existing dwelling unit shall be eligible to add GRFA, via the "interior space
conversion" provision in excess of existing or allowable GRFA including such
units located in a special development district; provided, that such GRFA
complies with the standards outlined herein.
2. For the purpose of this section, "existing unit" shall mean any dwelling unit that
has been constructed prior to August 5, 1997, and has received a certificate of
occupancy, or has been issued a building permit prior to August 5, 1997, or has
received final design review board approval prior to August 5, 1997.
•
Section 10. Section 12-15-5 (ADDITIONAL GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA
250 ORDINANCE) of the Vail Town Code shall hereby be amended as follows:
(Text which is to be deleted is indicated as s#is~er~. Text which is to be added is
indicated as bold italics.)
A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to provide an inducement for the upgrading of
existing dwelling units which have been in existence within the town for a period of at
least five (5) years by permitting the addition of up to two hundred fifty (250) square feet
of gross residential floor area (GRFA) to such dwelling units, provided the criteria set
forth in this section are met. This section does not assure each single-family or two-
family dwelling unit located within the town an additional two hundred fifty (250) square
feet, and proposals for any additions hereunder shall be reviewed closely with respect to
site planning, impact on adjacent properties, and applicable town development
standards. The two hundred fifty (250) square feet of additional gross residential floor
area may be granted to existing single-family dwellings, existing two-family and existing
multi-family dwelling units only once, but may be requested and granted in more than
one increment of less than two hundred fifty (250) square feet. Upgrading of an existing
dwelling unit under this section shall include additions thereto or renovations thereof, but
a demo/rebuild shall not be included as being eligible for additional gross residential \
floor area.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 17
•
B. Applicability: The provisions of this section shall apply to dwelling units in all
zone districts except the Single-Family Residential; Two-Family Residential, and
Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential Zone Districts.
C ~. Single-Family Dwellings And Two-Family Dwellings: Asingle-family ortwo-family
dwelling unit shall be eligible for additional gross residential floor area (GRFA) not to
exceed a maximum of two hundred fifty (250) square feet of GRFA in addition to the
existing or allowable GRFA for the site. Before such additional GRFA can be granted,
the single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit shall meet the following criteria:
1. Eligible Time Frame: Asingle-family ortwo-family dwelling unit shall be eligible
for additional GRFA, pursuant to this section, if it is in existence prior to
November 30, 1995, or a completed design review board application for the
original construction of said unit has been accepted by the department of
community development by November 30, 1995. In addition, at least five (5)
years must have passed from the date the single-family dwelling or two-family
dwelling unit was issued a certificate of occupancy (whether temporary or final)
or, in the event a certificate of occupancy was not required for use of the
dwelling at the time of completion, from the date of original completion and
occupancy of the dwelling.
2. Use Of Additional Floor Space: Proposals for the utilization of the additional •
gross residential floor area (GRFA) under this provision shall comply with all
town zoning requirements and applicable development standards. If a variance is
required for a proposal, it shall be approved by the planning and environmental
commission pursuant to chapter 17 of this title before an application is made in
accordance with this section. The applicant must obtain a building permit within
one year of final planning and environmental commission approval or the
approval for additional GRFA shall be voided.
3. Garage Conversions: If any proposal provides for the conversion of a garage
or enclosed parking area to GRFA, such conversion will not be allowed unless:
a) either the conversion will not reduce the number of enclosed parking spaces
below the number required by this code; or b) provision is made for creation of
such additional enclosed parking spaces as may be required for the new total
GRFA under this code. Plans for a new garage or enclosed parking area, if
required, shall accompany the application under this section, and shall be
constructed concurrently with the conversion.
4. Parking: Any increase in parking requirements as set forth in chapter 10 of this
title due to any GRFA addition pursuant to this section shall be met by the
applicant.
5. Conformity With Guidelines: All proposals under this section shall be required
to conform to the design review guidelines set~forth in chapter 11 of this title. A
single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit for which an addition is proposed shall be
required to meet the minimum town landscaping standards as set forth in
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 ~
chapter 11 of this title. Before any additional GRFA may be permitted in
accordance with this section, the staff shall review the maintenance and upkeep
of the existing. single-family or two-family dwelling and site, including
landscaping, to determine whether they comply with the design review
guidelines. No temporary certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any
expansion of GRFA pursuant to this section until all required improvements to
the site and structure have been completed as required.
6. Applicability: No pooling of gross residential floor area shall be allowed in
single-family ortwo-family dwelling units. No application for additional GRFA
shall request more than two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross residential
floor area per single-family dwelling ortwo-family dwelling, nor shall any
application be made for additional GRFA until such time as all the allowable
GRFA has been constructed on the property, or an application is presently
pending in conjunction with the application for additional GRFA that utilizes all
allowable GRFA for the property.
7. One-Time Grant: Any single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit which has
previously been granted additional GRFA pursuant to this section and is
demo/rebuild, shall be rebuilt without the additional GRFA as previously
approved.
• 8. Demo/Rebuild Not Eligible: Any single-family ortwo-family dwelling unit which
is to be demo/rebuild shall not be eligible for additional GRFA.
9. Nonconforming Structures And Site Improvements: Structures which do not
conform to density controls shall be eligible for additional GRFA pursuant to this
section.
D O. Multi-Family Dwellings: Any dwelling unit in amulti-family structure that meets
allowable GRFA shall be eligible for additional gross residential floor area (GRFA) not to
exceed a maximum of two hundred fifty (250) square feet of GRFA in addition to the
existing or allowable GRFA for the site. Any application of such additional GRFA must
meet the following criteria:
1. Eligible Time Frame: Amultiple-family dwelling unit shall be eligible for
additional GRFA, pursuant to this section, if it is in existence prior to November
30, 1995, or a completed design review board application for the original
construction of said unit has been accepted by the department of community
development by November 30, 1995. In addition, at least five (5) years must
have passed from the date the building was issued a certificate of occupancy
(whether temporary or final) or, in the event a certificate of occupancy was not
required for use of the building at the time of completion, from the date of original
completion and occupancy of the building.
2. Use Of Additional Floor Space: Proposals for the utilization of the additional
~~ GRFA under this provision shall comply with all town zoning requirements and
applicable development standards. If a variance is required for a proposal, it
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 19
shal- be approved by the planning and environmental commission pursuant to
chapter 17 of this title before an application is made in accordance with this
section: The applicant must obtain a building permit within one~year of final
planning and environmental commission approval or the approval for additional
GRFA shall be voided.
3. Parking Area Conversions: Portions of existing enclosed parking areas may
be converted to GRFA under this section if there is no loss of existing enclosed
parking spaces in said enclosed parking area.
4. Parking Requirements Observed: Any increase in parking requirements due to
any GRFA addition pursuant to this section shall be met by the applicant.
5. Guideline Compliance; Review: All proposals under this section shall be
reviewed for compliance with the design review guidelines as set forth in chapter
11 of this title. Existing properties for which additional GRFA is proposed shall be
required to meet minimum town landscaping standards as set forth in chapter 11
of this title. General maintenance and upkeep of existing buildings and sites,
including the multi-family dwellings, landscaping or site improvements (i.e., trash
facilities, berming to screen surface parking, etc.) shall be reviewed by the staff
after the application is made for conformance to said design review guidelines.
No temporary certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any expansion of
GRFA pursuant to this section until all required improvements to the multi-family
dwelling site and building have been completed as required. • ;
6. Condominium Association Submittal: An application for additional GRFA shall
be made on behalf of each of the individual dwelling unit owners by the
condominium association or similar governing body.
7. Applicability: The provisions of this section are applicable only to GRFA
additions to individual dwelling units. No pooling of GRFA shall be allowed in
multi-family dwellings. No application for additional GRFA shall request more
than two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross residential floor area per
dwelling unit nor shall any application be made for additional GRFA until such
time as all the allowable GRFA has been constructed on the property. When
exterior additions are proposed to amulti-family structure, the addition of the
GRFA shall be designed and developed in context of the entire structure.
8. Nontransferable To Demo/Rebuild: Any building which has previously been
granted additional GRFA pursuant to this section and is demo/rebuild, shall be
rebuilt without the additional GRFA as previously approved.
9. Demo/Rebuild Not Eligible: Any multiple-family structure or dwelling unit which
is to be demo/rebuild shall not be eligible for additional GRFA.
10. Nonconforming Structures And Site Improvements: Structures which do not
conform to density controls shall be eligible for additional GRFA pursuant to this
section.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 20
L
E ~. Procedure:
1. Application; Content: Application shall be made on forms provided by the
department of community development. If the property is owned in common
(condominium association) or jointly with other property owners such as
driveways or C parcels in duplex subdivisions, byway of example and not
limitation, the written approval of the other property owner, owners or applicable
owners' association shall be required. This can be either in the form of a letter of
approval or signature on the application. The application shall also include:
a. A fee pursuant to the current schedule shall be required with the
application.
b. Information and plans as set forth and required by subsection 12-11-
4C of this title.
c. Any other applicable information required by the department of
community development to satisfy the criteria outlined in this section.
2. Hearing Set; Notice: Upon receipt of a completed application for additional
GRFA, the design review board shall set a date for a hearing in accordance with
subsection 12-11-4C2 of this title. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance
with subsections 12-11-4C2 and C3 of this title.
• 3. Compliance Determined: If the department of community development staff
determines that the site for which the application was submitted is in compliance
with town landscaping and site improvement standards, the applicant shall
proceed as follows:
a. Application for GRFA additions which involve no change to the exterior
of a structure shall be reviewed and approved by the department of
community development.
b. Applications for GRFA additions involving exterior changes to a
building shall be reviewed and approved by the design review board in
accordance with the provisions of this section.
4. Compliance Required: If the department of community development staff
determines that the site for which additional GRFA is applied for pursuant to this
section does not comply with minimum town landscaping or site standards as
provided herein, the applicant will be required to bring the site into compliance
with such standards before any such temporary or permanent certificate of
occupancy will be issued for the additional GRFA added to the site. Before any
building permit is issued, the applicant shall submit appropriate plans and
materials indicating how the site will be brought into compliance with said town
minimum standards, which plans and materials shall be reviewed by and
approved by the department of community development.
• 5. Building Permit: Upon receiving the necessary approvals pursuant to this
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 21
section, the applicant shall proceed with the securing of a building permit prior to •
beginning the construction of additional GRFA.
Section 12. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have
passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof,
regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
Section 13. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
Section 14. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code as provided in this
ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that
occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or
proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of
any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or
superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 15. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall
not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore
•
repealed. ,
•
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 22
•
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 1St day of June, 2004 and a public
hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the _ day of _ , 2004, in the Council
Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
ATTEST:
Rod Slifer, Mayor
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
• READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this
day of , 2004.
Rod Slifer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
•
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2004 23