Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-12-07 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session~® ~~~~~~ V1l®RlC SESSI®N AGENDA VAIL T®IflIN C®IJNCIL CB-I~-IVII3ERS 75 S. Frontage Road UV. Vail, C® 8'1657 9:~5 ~.i~., TUESDAY, DECEAAI3ER 7, 2004 N®TE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. George Ruther ITEflA/T®PIC: PEC/DRB Update. (10 min.) 2. Russ Forrest ITENI/T®PIC: Architectural Direction on the Vail Conference Center. (45 min.) ACTT®N RE(~UESTED ®F C®IJNCIL: The Town Council is requested to provide direction on the architectural direction for the conference center. Three alternative approaches have been developed and discussed with the community over the last 4 weeks. Other items the Committee would like to review with the Town Council include: ~ .Review progress to date on the site planning and circulation for the facility, and Receive an update on the Master Plan for the facility REC®f1ANiENDATI®N: The Conference Center Advisory Committee reviewed the public input associated with the three design alternatives on November 18~'. After reviewing the public input and the associated costs with each design option the Committee would like to forward a recommendation for the "Architectural Vision Inspired by Nature." 3. John Gulick BT(EM/T®PIC: QRV Update. (30 min.) (Please see attachment) 4. Nino Licciardi ITEItfl/T®PIC: Vail Recreation District. (15 min.) Peter Cook .Request for co-pay for Outdoor Ice Sheet. VRD requests TOV financial assistance (50%) in providing a free outdoor ice rink at the Vail Golf Club driving range. Estimated costs of $5,000 plus potential turf replacement are being requested. - Request for $60,000 in RETT funds for capital improvements to Ford Park clay courts. VRD requests RETT funds for capital repairs on the Ford Park Clay Tennis Courts as per TOV/VRD lease of 12.21.93: "Maintenance and Repairs." Courts require substructure (irrigation) and fencing repairs for an estimated total cost of $60,000 for the two north banks of courts. 5. Lorelei Donaldson ITEMITOPIC: Discuss current Ford Park Paid Parking dates for the 2005 Summer Calendar. (5 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with amendments the summer calendar for Ford .Park paid parking dates for 2005. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The 2005 Managed Parking Calendar Schedule for Ford Park is attached. This calendar has been compiled by the ~ Ford Park User Committee from our meeting on November 29, 2004. We are requesting your review and approval of the calendar for paid parking dates at Ford Park for the Summer, 2005 schedule. There are currently 40 days of paid parking requested as well as one managed parking date. This calendar is subject to change as more events are added to the various schedules of the user groups at Ford Park. RECOMMENDATION: Approve or approve with amendments, the summer calendar for Ford Park paid parking dates for 2005. 6. Warren Campbell ITEM/TOPIC: Discuss Second Reading of Ordinance No. #24, Series of 2004, an Ordinance establishing Special Development District (SDD) No. #38, Manor Vail Lodge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (45 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. #24, Series of 2004. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On October 19, 2004, the Town Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. #24, Series of 2004, by a vote of 7-0. In conjunction with the approval the Council requested that the applicant and staff provide a copy of the proposed Manor Vail Lodge. Development Agreement. In addition, Council requested that the applicant develop a program which would encourage the new units to be included within the rental base of Manor Vail Lodge. It was requested by Council that staff explore in greater detail how the proposed $100,000 for streetscape improvements would be best utilized. STAFF REC®MNIEN®~4TI®f~: The Community Development Department recommends that the Vail Town Council approves Ordinance No. #24, Series of 2004, on second reading. 7. ITEi~/T'®P'IC: Information Update. (10 min.) 8. ITI=MIT®I'IC: Matters from Mayor ~ Council. (10 min.) 9. ITEf~iI/T®PIC: Adjournment. (4:05 p.m.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 12 NOON, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2004 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please ca11479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION `~ PUBLIC MEETING . n°_ if~'CF~.~1L; ` Monday, November 22, 2004 PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 92:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Doug Cahill Chas Bernhardt George Lamb Rollie Kjesbo David Viele Anne Gunion Bill Jewitt Site Visits: , 1. One Willow Bridge -100 Willow Bridge Road Driver: George NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:OOp.m., the Commission may break for dinner from 6:00- 6:30p.m. Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm - - - - -1. - A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7A-2, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a variance from Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail --~Town_Code,~to_allow for revisions_to.the.previously_ approved~developmentTplan for One Willow Bridge Road (previously Swiss Chalet), located at 100 Willow Bridge Road/Tracts K & L, Block _ 5E, Vail Village First Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. ~..~,;;,, Applicant: One Willow Bridge Road, represented by Resort Design, Inc. Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Approved -- ---- MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 7-0-0 George Ruther presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. The applicant, Mike Foster, stated that he was available for questions or comments. Chad Salli and Tom Kassmel, Town of Vail Public Works Department, were also available for questions and comments. The PEC questioned why the elevations of the various floor heights changed. Mike Foster explained the design rational for the proposed changes. The Commission noted that this proposal proactively addressed streetscape and drainage issues that were raised by the Town of Vail after the original approval of this project. There was no public comment. 2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of proposed text amendments to - ~ -~ - Section 12-3-3(E), Appeal of Town Council Decisions, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Matt Mire Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Jewitt VOTE:7-0-0 George Ruther presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. The Commission had no comment or discussion. There was no public comment. 3. A request for final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a Type II Employee Housing Unit, located at 4812 Meadow Lane/Lot 8, Block 7, Bighorn Fifth Addition, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Bighorn LLC and, the Duane F. Rogers Revocable Trust, represented by Larry Benway Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved, with conditions MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 7-0-0 ~;ONDITiGNS: 1) This conditional use permit approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the related design review application. 2) Prior to final design review approval, the applicant shall revise the plans to illustrate a minimum of 75 sq.ft. of additional storage. 3) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall execute a Type II EHU deed restriction with the Town of Vail Department of Community Development to permanently restrict the use of the EHU for employee housing. Bill Gibson presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. Larry Benway, applicant's representative, presented the revised floor plans showing the required additional storage for the proposed Type II EHU. There was no public comment. The Commission emphasized the Town's need to address the current EHU enforcement issues and allow Type II EHUs as permitted uses, rather than conditional uses. 4. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition located at 2339 Chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert Stephanoff, represented by Jack Snow, RKD Architects Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approve with conditions MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: ?-0-0 CONDITIONS: 1) This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the related design review application. Bill Gibson presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. Jack Snow, architect, and Bob Stephanoff, applicant, presented an overview of the existing conditions of property and the details of the proposal. ___There.was no public.comment. _ ____.______. ._ _ . _ _ . _ _ Commissioner Kjesbo disclosed his former business relationship with the applicant, but noted that he had no conflict of interest in reviewing this application. The Commission was complimentary of the design and architecture of the proposal. The Commission recognized that this proposal is an addition to an existing non-conforming house and was not new construction or ademo-rebuild. 'The Commission noted the existing conditions and circumstances associated with this proposal which justify a variance and do not create a grant of special privilege. The Commission questioned the applicant about the degree of the variance requested and any alternatives which were explored. The applicant explained the design options they had considered and the option of maximizing the allowable site coverage with GRFA and then requesting a larger site coverage variance for a future garage addition. The Commission noted that this request was comparable to other site coverage variances previously approved by the Town. The Commission did not believe approval of this request would create a precedent. The Commission commented that the approval of variances similar to this request provide flexibility and incentives for redevelopment of existing properties that are difficult to renovate. The Commission noted that approving this request as proposed created a .more attractive design than could be achieved by making minor reductions to the amount of site coverage being requested. The Commission commented that the site coverage variance being requested was for a garage and small cantilevered elements. The Commission believed that while this request allows for a deviation from the allowable site coverage numbers, it does meet the intent of the site coverage regulations. ' 5. A request for revision to the final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area, located at 1094 Riva Glen/Lot 4, Spraddle Creek Estates, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: W&B Development, LLC, represented by Tim Losa, Zehren and Associates, Inc. Planner: Matt Gennett _~___ ACTION,: Tabled to December 13, 2004 ' MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE:7-0-0 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposal to establish Special Development District No. 39, pursuant to Article 12-9(A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of Crossroads, a mixed use development; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3- 7, Amendment, to add a definition for bowling alley; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment; to add bowling alleys as a conditional use; and requests for conditional use permits to allow for the construction of an outdoor operation of the accessory uses as set forth in Section 12-7E-5 (ice skating rink); a major arcade to include indoor entertainment; a theater, meeting rooms, and convention facilities; multiple-family dwellings and lodges; and a private club to allow for the establishment of a for sale parking club, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Vail Town Code, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Crossroads East One, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Warren Campbell ~ ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION: Bernhardt ~ SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE:7-0-0 7. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6G-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional gross residential floor area and dwelling unit, located at 4690 Vail Racquet Club Drive/Vail Racquet Club Condos, and setting forth detail in regard thereto. Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by TRD Architects Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Tabled to December 13, 2004 MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: ?-0-0 8. Approval of November 8, 2004 minutes MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: ?-0-0 9. Information Update 10. Adjournment MOTION: Lamb SECOND: Viele VOTE:?-0-0~ The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection dung regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road: The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail-Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Published, November 19, 2004, in~the Vail Daily. ~'~"~_ DESIGN REVIEVI/ BOARD AGENDA ---- - _~~~ ~ November 17, 2004 ~~"` 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC WELCOME PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT Pete Dunning Joe Hanlon Diana Mathias Bill Pierce Margaret.Fiogers MEMBERS ABSENT SITE VISITS 1. Christman/Rothaker Residence - 2944 Bighorn Road 2. Smith Residence - 2892 A&B Kinnikinnick Road 3. Haley Residence - 2844 Snowberry Drive 4. Crack of Noon - 1722 Buffehr Creek 5. Dantas Residences - 1772 - 1788 Alpine Drive Driver: George PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Christman/Rothaker Residence DR604-0564 Final review of a minor alteration 2944 Bighorn Road/Lot 7, Gore Creek Park Applicant: Laura Christman, represented by The Consilium Group, LLC ACTION: Tabled to December 1, 2004 MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 2. Smith Residence DRB04-0567 Final review of a minor alteration 2892 A & B Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 1, Block 8, Innsbruck Meadows Applicant: Jeffrey Karl Smith and Roger Egli ACTION: Tabled to December 1, 2004 MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 3. Haley Residence DRB04-0392 Final review of a residential addition 2844 Snowberry Drive/Lot 18, Block 9, Vail Intermountain Applicant: Mike and Maria Haley, represented by Bobby Ladd ACTION: Tabled to December 1, 2004 MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 12:OOpm 2:OOpm 3:OOpm Elisabeth Elisabeth Elisabeth 4. Crack of Noon DRB04-0361 Elisabeth Conceptual review of a residential addition 1722 Buffehr Creek/Lot 5, Block A, Lia Zneimer Applicant: Mr. and Mrs. Babel, represented by K.H. Webb Architects ACTION: Conceptual review - no vote 5. Dantas Residences DRB04-0597 George Conceptual review of new construction 1772 - 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots 10, 11, & 12, Vail Village West Filing No. 1 Applicant: Dantas Builders ACTION: Conceptual review - no vote 6. Lionshead Core Site Hotel DRB04-0305 George Final review of a major exterior alteration 675 Lionshead Place/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon request). Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represe^+cc! by Braun ,4ssociates, .Inc. . ACTION: Tabled to December 1, 2004 MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 Staff Approvals Forst Residence DRB04-0578 Elisabeth Final review of a minor alteration 1,600 Lions Ridge Loop/Lot 20, Dauphinais Moseley Applicant: Tracy and Stephanie Forst, represented by Atlas Construction, Inc. Sharpshooter Imaging Sign DRB04-0575 Elisabeth Final review of a sign 244 Wall Street, Unit 6C/Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Richard Roy Perot Residence DRB04-0571 Bill Final review of a minor alteration 84 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 28, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Mr. Perot, represented by Steve, A Cut Above Forestry Bogetveit Residence DRB04-0582 Joe Final review of a,minor alteration 2550 Kinnikinnick Road, Unit J3/Meadow Creek Condominiums Applicant: Kelly Bogetveit, represented by T-Squared Builders, Inc. Lionshead III Condominium Association DRB04-0524 Elisabeth Final review of a minor alteration 360 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 Applicant: Lionshead III Condominium Association, represented by Ryan Sommers Cook Residence DRB04-0593 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 1125 Hornsilver Circle/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 8 Applicant: Laura Cook, represented by A Cut Above Forestry Jordan Residence DRB04-0592 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 483 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 6 Applicant: John W. Jordan, represented by G.H. Daniels & Associates, Inc. Croteau Residence DRB04-0594 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 50278 Ute Lane/Lot 31, Block 19, Vail ,Meadows Filing 1 Applicant: Robert Croteau and Karen Nold O'Hara Residence DRB04-0595 Joe Final review of a minor alteration 1711 B Geneva Drive, Lot 5B, Matterhorn Village Applicant: Thomas and Laura O'Hara Baltz Residence.DRB04-0581 Warren ~~ Final 'review of a minor alteration 5147 Gore Circle/Lot 14, Block 3, Bighorn Subdivision Applicant: Steve and Marty Baltz, represented by Ray Terrell, DDH Ruggles & Assciates Gore Creek Place DRB04-0534 Warren Final review of change to approved plans 790 West Lionshead Circle/Lots A,B,C, Morcus Subdivision Applicant: Vail Resorts, Inc., represented by Todd Goulding Safeway DRB04-0583 Bill Final review of a minor alteration 2131 North Frontage Road .West/Lot 3, Vail Das Schone Filing 3 Applicant: Pioneer General Contractors, Inc. Mahoney Residence DRB04-0589 Matt Final review of change to approved plans 433 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 15/Lot 15, Block 4, Vail Trails East Applicant: Noelle and Mark Mahoney, represented by Steve Riden, AIA Mezzaluna Restaurant DRB04-0569 ~ Matt Final review of a sign 1660 W. Lionshead PlacelLot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, Addition 1 Applicant: Deryk Cave, represented by Sign Design The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. c iViENiORA9VDUM TO: Vail Town Council ~~ FROM: Conference Center Advisory Committee DATE: December 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Update on the Vail Conference Center Planner: Russell Forrest 1. PURPOSE The Town Council is requested to provide direction on the arcthectural direction for the conference center. Three alternative approaches have been developed and discussed with the community over the last 4 weeks. Other items the Committee would like to review with the Town Council include: Review progress to date on the site planning and circulation for the facility, and Receive an update on the Master Plan for the facility 2. B,4CECGROUiVD The Vail Town Council on April 20, 2004, authorized a series of next steps which included interviewing owner's representative firms for the Conference Center.- On April 29, 2004, the Committee met to interview five owner's representative firms. On May 18, 2004, the Vail Town Council authorized the Town Manager to execute a contract with ARC to be the Town's owner's representative and funding for the first phase of this contract or $8,510. The Vail Town Council also authorized the Committee to negotiate with both Piper Jaffray and Kirtpatrick Pettis to be the Town's investment banker on this project. On June 1, 2004, the Vail Town Council voted to approve the following requests from the Committee: . © Authorization to engage Piper Jaffray as the Town's investment banker for the Conference Center. Authorization to issue an RFQ for design team assistance on the Conference Center. Request to .move forward with a negotiated guaranteed maximum price (GMP) process for engaging a design team and a general contractor (as opposed to a design build process). This essentially means that both the architect and general contractor will work for the Town of Vail. Request for the Vail Town Council to approve the next phase of an owner's representative contract. The preconstruction phase of the contract would cost up to $155,774. However, the Committee is only requesting $93,212 (includes fees and reimbursables) to fund this function until a decision is made by the Vail Town Council to issue bonds which is anticipated in the November/December 2004 time frame. On June 15, 2004, the Vail Town Council reviewed and approved the following ~~ next steps: o Approval of the proposed process for engaging the public in the design team selection process. Selection criteria for request for proposals. Consideration of proposed process givens. o Review of updated project budget and interrelated parking costs, and Consideration and review of the major points of the proposed scope of service request for proposals for design services (to be given to the top 3-4 teams selected in the qualification competition). On July 6th, the Vail Town Council reviewed and approved the following next steps: Review the recommendation from the Committee on short-listing the design team candidates and to issue the Request for Proposals (RFP) to the six recommended design teams. Review and approve suggested changes to the design team selection process from the Committee. Request permission to issue a RFP for a surveyor to survey the Lionshead parking structure site and surrounding area. On July 20, 2004 the Vail Town Council unanimously approved the following: o.: A contract for design services with Fentress Bradburn. o' Approval of next steps for master planning the Lionshead Parking Structure/conference center site. On September 21, 2004 the Town Council, Conference Center Advisory Committee, Design Review Board, and Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed 5 alternatives site plans. In addition, the public reviewed the same alternatives on September 22"d. The near unanimous opinion from the various groups that reviewed the site plans was that alternative 3 is the preferred choice. Staff is now adjusting what the Design Team will be working on over the next two week. to further refine alternative three and test this alternative versus developing other; alternatives further. On October 19th the Vail Town Council met and reviewed an update on architectural images for the conference center and authorized the Committee to move forward with public discussions regarding the alternative styles. The Committee met on October 21St and reviewed the qualification submitted by six general contractors. After reviewing the qualifications, the committee recommended to the Vail Town Council that three general contractors receive requests for proposals. Those general contractors include: Hansel Phelps Construction Hunt Construction Grou/Hyder Construction M.A Mortenson Company On November 2, 2004, the Town Council approved a motion to forward the above mentioned contractors requests for proposals. 3. ®ESCRIPTION OF FiECaUESTS A. Architectural Stvle Alternatives The design team of Fentress Bradburn developed three alternative architectural approaches. The images in attachment A are notthe elevations of the proposed conference center but rather provide alternative visions or inspirations that could be considered for the conference center. The three styles include: 1) Bavarian/Traditional Vail style 2) Contemporary 3) Natural/Environmentally inspired style Also included in attachment A are possible site and floor plans for the conference center. A critical site planning issue has been whether Vail International is willing work with the Town to create access off of the Frontage Road and eliminate the current access to Vail International from East Lionshead Circle (between Dobson and the Parking Structure). In addition, the Committee explored the idea of cooperating with Vail International on loading and delivery access for both Vail International and the Conference Center. After several meetings with Vail International, the Association expressed some interest in continuing to work with the Town on providing access off of the Frontage. Road. However; the Association . has expressed no interest in further working on a joint loading and delivery solution. Also the time frame for coming to a decision on alternative access with Vail International could be longer than could be afforded in the design process. Public Input The design team and staff have provided numerous opportunities for the public to comment on the three possible architectural styles. These opportunities are summarized in attachment B. They included public meetings, meetings with lodge owners, merchants, adjacent property . owners, home owner association meetings, an open house on election day, and posting the information on the Town's web site. Attachment C summarizes the public comments received to date on the three architectural images. While there was a wide variety of specific comments; there were generally three themes from these comments: 1. Comments about the specific architectural features and design- (i.e. ability to have a visual connection to the mountains). 2. Comments that any style needed to address how the structure would be integrated with adjacent uses, (particularly the Lionshead parking structure). 3. Comments about the preferred alternative style images. There were comments that supported the Traditional Vail Vernacular Vision and the Natural Vision. There were very few comments that supported the modern-meets-organic style. Comments seemed to: reflect a need to continue a Bavarian image as seen in Vail Village and the new Lionshead, or given the use, diversity of architectural styles around the site, and a desire to have a civic building that stands out to opt for the natural vision. It should be noted that many that favored the natural vision still believed the roof form needed further development and refinement. Cost Comparison The Conference Center Committee asked that the alternative design visions be evaluated based on cost. Attachment D summarizes the costs the Committee reviewed on November 18'h. The natural vision (Image 3) is approximately $800,000 more than the Traditional Bavarian vision (image 1). This is primarily due to a more expensive roof structure on the natural vision. Committee Recommendation The Conference Center Advisory Committee reviewed the public input associated with the three design alternatives on November 18th: After reviewing the public input and the associated costs with each design option the Committee would like to forward a recommendation for the "Architectrual Vision Inspired by Nature." The Committee felt that this would create an outstanding archtectural structure. The materials as envisioned by the design team would utilize "mountain"materials such as heavy stone and timbers. The roof element would be more iconic but is intended to reflect the form of the surrounding mountains. It should also be noted that one member of the committee, although not present on November 18th, preferred the Traditional Vail Vernacular look. The committee is further recommending that the entire loading and delivery function occur under the conference center rather than sharing maneuverings space on Vail International property. In addition, the Committee is recommending that vehicular access for Vail International be maintained in its current location for now. However, with the current site plan it may be possible to provide Vail International access off of the Frontage Road using the conference center access point if the Association would like to move the access. This would improve pedestrian circulation on East Lionshead Circle and reduce vehicular conflicts between Dobson and the Conference,Center. .> B. Master Plan The Committee and the design team are also working on a Master Plan. The proposed purpose and goals of the Master Plan are summarized in attachment E. The overall purpose of the Master Plan is to ensure the conference center is successfully integrated with the Lionshead Parking structure and surrounding vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The Plan is also intended to assist in future planning for a transit facility and additional public parking for Lionshead. The technical issues related to a transit facility and parking are still being finalized. A critical staff meeting with transportation consultants is planned for December 3`d to review some of the technical considerations for locating transit functions on the Lionshead structure or a redeveloped structure. Also staff is working with the design team to determine the optimal amount of parking spaces that can be located under the conference center and the related costs associated with conference center parking and additional public parking. Your input on the purpose and goals of the Master Plan would be very much appreciated. C. Next Steps Proposed next steps include: o December 14 2004 at 3:00: Conference Center Advisory Committee December 21, 2004Town Council update on design and review of draft Master Plan December 22, 2004: Conference Center Advisory Committee January 19, 2005: General Contractor Interviews ' ,o ° Fabruary i, 2005: Council Decision on moving forward°'with b`ond' ` sales. Attachment A Alternative Architectural Images Attachment B Public Input Opportunities Attachment C Public Input Attachment D Cost comparison summary of alternatives Attachment E Master Plan Summary 5 P tt~~ eat ~a~~~~~ ~~~t rtu~oi g Public Outreach Activities ~'®l1+;lB~ ®f VaiO 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Date .Time Location ®escription Approximate Ex osure 21-Sep-04 6:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Council Chambers Presentation of master plan update Town Council 30 22-Sep-04 4:OOpm 5:15pm ToV Library Public Open house to review Master Plan options._ 5 22-Sep-04 5:15pm 6:30pm ToV Library Presentation of Master Plan options to public 15 5-Oct-04 6:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Councii Chambers Update presented to Town Council 25 12-Oct-04 5:15pm 6:30pm ToV Library Public open house & update 12 19-Oct-04 6:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Council Chambers Design styles presented to Town Council 30 20-Oct-04 2:30pm 4:OOpm ToV Library Adjacent property owner meetings -update on process and review of building 60 concepts 20-Oct-04 4:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Library Public update meeting -update on process & review of building concepts 30 26-Oct-04 12:OOpm 2:OOpm ToV eomm Design presentation to local architects 10 26-Oct-04 2:OOpm 3:OOpm Bart & Yeti's Design presentation to Lionshead merchants 8 26-Oct-04 3:OOpm 4:OOpm Manor Vail Design presentation to hoteliers 11 27-Oct-04 5:OOpm 6:30pm ToV Town Council Public update meeting -update on process & review of updated building 5 Chambers concepts 2-Nov-04 7:OOam 7:OOpm Donovan Pavillion Election Day "Open House" 1000 + 4-Nov-04 S:OOpm 6:OOpm ToV Library Public update meeting -update on process & review of updated building 5 concepts TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT.,. Page ~ Of ~ ©2004 All Rights Reserved By p:\current projects\...\Conference Center Meeting Schedules.xls ~ ~ ~ Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. .. _: _ . _ _. Attachment C _ _ Public Input 9 Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By N N Question /Comment ~ _ ~ ° ~ -°-' U ~ ~ N ~ ~ c N r ~ rn ~ ~ C m E E a~ ~ ~ ~ m .V c o U m E o y ~ . ~ O ~ N a v v o m ~ m E Q E ~ j U c o ~ N r; U c 3 w a ~ ~ U ~, o ~ o = a o 4 Y o ~ m ~ c F' r a: 0 . ~ ~ o d. Q Q j a 1 Would like additional development on the roof structure and X covering ideas and options for the "natural" design style X 2 Concern with the natural style not effectively tying the villages X X together X 3 Need to engage more public comment and input X X X X 4 Prefer the traditional and natural styles to the modern style X X X X 5 Need to confirm the proposed options can be built within the X current budget X 8 The natural design is spectacular and will promote marketing of X the facility X 7 Vail is an icon in and of itself X X 8 It would be great to create our own Sydney Opera House - an X X iconic image for the town, if we can afford it 9 It would be easy to follow the traditional style, but it would be a X mistake X 10 Prefer the modern or natural styles X X X 11 Need something spectacular X X 12 Prefer the natural, modern, then traditional X X X X The design team was chosen to develop a style along the lines of 13 the natural style X X 14 The natural style is not a Vail statement X X 15 Prefer the traditional style, but prefer the sketches to the X rendering X 16 Don't compromise the building io meet the budget -wait till we have enough money to build without skimping X X X 17 Be sure to incorporate comments from holiday crowd X X X 18 The natural option has potential, but is scary X X 19 The traditional option works best with the core site and ties the villages together X X 20 The natural option is fascinating but risky X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... P29e 'I Of Z4 ©2004 All RIgMS ReserveA By p:kurtenl prgecls\...V~rchilecWral Design Style Commenis.xls AiehiteIXU2i Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 TOWn of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By l9 N C N v! ' Question ~ Comment ; U ~ ~ ~ _ °' ~ N = ° , (n ~ ~ .~+. ~ c ~ w m d .~. ~~ N E E N ,~ ~ m C ~ o U m E E o N ~ ~ C 3 O ~ m d ~ o. c m ~ g E ¢ E o c o N U c w a ~ o U m 0 a 0 -Y ~ m m o is ~ o ~ U ~ 3 0 2 a` ~ c ~ ~ m N O. 'O Q ~ C7 O o ¢ a 21 Don't mimic the "mostly roof' aspect of Dobson Arena X X 22 Needs to feel elegant and maintain the feel of Vail X X X 23 The natural option has wild potential X X 24 Concerned with the longevity of the natural option X X 25 Lean toward the traditional option X X 26 The design needs to be timeless X X 27 Concerned with the natural design fitting into the center of town X X X 28 Concerned with the scale of the traditional option X X X 29 The natural option may accommodate the scale of the building X X X better 30 Concerned that the options may.impose architectural restrictions X X on future development 31 Ensure all options allow foF daylighting X X X Whatever is done will be a "statement" so I don't really understand how a desire to make a statement militates toward 32 one concept or the other; the issue is whether the statement that X X X X will be made is harmonious with other elements of the town or not. A building that introduces a dramatically new architecture is likely to be a mistake. The natural environment of the town includes and in large part is 33 dominated by the prevailing architectural theme which is X X overwhelmingly Alpine/Bavarian and will be more so once the Core Area project is completed. 34 The natural drawing was sufficiently unclear that a variety of i f l d ti t ithi th X X p e genera escr on. designs can i w n The "Contemporary" approach was cleverly eliminated by a 35 design that harmonized with the one part of the parking structure X X that everyone agreed had to go! The last variable is topography so it looks like your challenge is to ~~ provide elevations that track the mountains but in a structure that 36 ' X X t have too has Alpine/Bavarian features so taxpayers like me don many problems. 37 Please register my vote in favor of the Bavarian mountain style X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 2 Or Z4 ®2004 All Rights Reservetl fiy p.~curtent prgectsl. Wrchileclural Design Sryle Co~rmenls.+ls Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 ~ TOWn of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By N C N Question /Comment N (0 ~ N ~ _ N N ~ ~ _ m m w ~ ~ m a= ~ m E E d y ~ m _ c o U m E o N ~ ~ ~ O 7 N a a c v ~ ~ E ¢ E U ~ o N N U c w _a D: D U ~, ~ o a 0 Y 0` ~ d ~ o ~ m 2 ~ tj d y ~ ~ o o m x a ~ c ~ ~ _ in m 'N a a H -'o ¢ ~ a C7 U o Q a Please remember that the 70's contemporary architecture in 38 Lionshead did not age well. This is and will always be a ski X X resort. Your designs should reflect this without getting silly. Please do not go for the Contemporary styling. Most of Lionshead 39 design was done in what was "contemporary" in the 70's; now it X X just looks dated. 40 As an owner in the Lodge at Lionshead, I'd love to see the X X Bavarian, but the "topography-inspired" sounds interesting X I very much like the Bavaria/Mountain style best out of the 3 41 styles presented. This style has been used so effectively in many X ski areas. It looks elegant and beautiful in the mountain X surroundings. really dislike the contemporary style. I believe it would bean 42 X eye sore and be very much out of place X The only design of the three that stays in keeping with the feel of 43 the Vail community is the Bavarian design. The others, while X X X creative, would eventually, and, in the not too'distant future take a X decidedly dated appearance and become a blight on the community. 44 Ensure to incorporate daylighting as it has been shown to X X enhance learning X If the stacking option C is chosen, the height of the structure 45 should not be a concern as that scale is not continuous along that X X road 46 Account for the possibility of expansion X X X 47 The Conference Center should look like a conference center - it doesn't need to fit into the historical precedent X X X 48 Consider moving the additional meeting rooms back to the S. to some extent in stacking diagram C X X 49 The amount of mass at the frontage road in stacking diagram C is a little concerning X X 50 Confirm the "natural" design option works with the budget X X X ~ The thinking process behind the "natural' design is correct but the 51~ design needs to be refined, though it should be noted there is no lack of confidence that the design team will come up with X X "appropriate architecture," 62 There is no honesty in making the convention center look like another row of shops in town X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 3 Ot Z4 ©2gM All Rights Reservetl By p:kvnenl projedsl..lArchilecWral Design Style Commenls.sls Architectural Resource Consullan6, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category .Brought up By ( N C Q1 N Question /Comment ~ p ~~„ N ~ 41 ^' ~ U (p ~ ~ ` N ~ ~ m O U m O ~ O vi d c o c ~ m j E Q~ ~ ~ c ~ y U c W d ~ p U ~ o o. Y 0 m ~ ~ z ~~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 = 0 a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a ~ a n c~ o a a' 53 The modern option does not fit in this area X X X A roof similar to DIA may work with the natural option- it is proven 54 X X to work and is budgetable Conferences are supposed to be fun and need an exciting 55 X X building like the "natural" design to enhance the experience 56 Concern with limited expansion opportunities with the roof of the X X X "natural" design - Snow cornices are only in Vail a few months each year -consider 57 X X additional "greener" ropf options 58 Be sure to study reflectivity, etc if a roof as proposed in the " " X X natural option is decided upon 59 Any option chosen needs to be grounded in native materials X X . The natural design is the most exciting and stimulating, but ~ 60 clarification on the roof structure, especially during the summer X X months, is needed. 61 Don't let the Donovan Park history make us timid in approaching X X this design 62 It is okay if the building doesn't tie in exactly to Lionshead X X X 63 The "natural" design needs to be refined, but is the closet to the d i d i i i X X es re con c mage. 64 What is the cost difference between the different options? X X X 65 Believe meeting planners will desire the "traditional Vail" look X X 66 Design options should be ranked as follows: natural, traditional, X X X X modern. 67 The natural design will get people talking and make the building X X marketable ' 68 If need be, we can live with the traditional option, but it is not X X moving. TEAMWORH DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Pd JE Q O( 24 J 200a All R'ghts Reserved 8y o ~cunenl proieclsl..Wrchiteclural Design Style Commenls.xls Archileclural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 1 Comment Category Brought Up By m N c Question /Comment ~ `_ ~ ° ~ d ~' ~' ° - ° in m .-o~. ~ ~ ~ -N- aci v aci a`~i ~ ~ m c o .~ E ° c 3 ~ ~ a a' ~ ~ 3 E Q E E ° ~ o y U c w 4. ~ ~ U _ .~ o n o " `o m `o ~ o ~ m Z ~ V d ~ .. ~ m ~ ° 0 ~ 0 v~ 2 a` ~ ~ ° c d r- ~ ~ '~ a ~' ¢ j U c~ o a a 69 Should consider tying into the new Lionshead architecture X X 70 Need to ensure natural light is brought to the ballrooms X X X Windows in banquets are typically a benefit,~while windows in 71 X X X meeting rooms can be a distraction. 72 Ensure flexibility with natural light in the building X X X 73 The option of using the roof as an outdoor gathering area is a l b f f ki X X arge ene it o stac ng diagram C 74 The modern design is not what people picture when they come to X the mountains X 75 Need a design that won't become dated X X Curious as to how any of the designs tie into the existing 76 Li h d ki X X X ons ea par ng structure. 77 Concerned with how the natural design will look in the middle of town X X X Don't see how the natural design will ever work with the feel of 78 X Vail X 79 The traditional design is Vail's sense of place and what people X come here for. X SO The traditional design will be easier to market in Vail. X X 81 The modern design is great, but has the possibility to become X dated X 82 Is there a difference in usable/wasted space with any of the X proposed options? X X 83 The maximization of the amount of glass in the modern design X will help make the facility more marketable X TEAMWORK DNIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... P2 JC S 0(ZC ®200d All Rights Reservetl By o:kurrent oroiectsl...Wrchileclural Desien Slvle Commenls.xls Archileriural Rnsnurce CnnsnlUnls. Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town Of Vail Cohference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02. DEC 04 Comment Category wrought Up ey (p N C N N Question /Comment O O N O ~ N ~ ~ ~ U . _>, m N ~ N ~ U u 0 C ~ N 01 m .U O U rD O ~ ~ O _ N . d o ~ ~ ~ ~ E Q E E (J w c ~ ~ N U ~ w a ~ p U ~ .~ o n 0 Y 0 ~ ~ :o Z ~ rj Q1 c o ~ ~ = a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m N a ~ a a ~ c7 U o ¢ a The views from the conference center should be sold, not the 84 X X views of the conference center. 85 Dislike designing to match everything else -rank the options as X X X X follows: modern, natural, traditional. 86 Like the possibility of the natural option, but need to see further X X development 87 Extensive amount of glass gives an urban feel and doesn't belong X X in Vail. 88 A large expanse of glass provides operational challenges. X X 89 The space and function of the interior is more important than the X X X image. 90 Need to ensure the kitchen is at the same level as the ballrooms X X 91 I love the natural look and the idea of a focal point with the X X illuminated cone If people want an alpine look from the highway then have an 92 alpine look on the north side and a more contemporary type look X X on the south side? 93 Concerned with heat loss issues associated with the extensive X X amounts of glass in the modern option 94 Would prefer a departure from "Traditional Vail" X X X 95 We need to use this opportunity to make a statement X X 96 Like the concept behind the natural design, but the design needs th l t f d X ~ ~ X ur eve opmen er 97 Cost difference between the design styles should be considered X X X 98 If a signature building can be created within budget, that design X X should be pursued TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 6 O( ZQ ~ ®20D4 NI k~ghls Reserved By Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 TOWn Of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By N N Question /Comment ~ O _N ~ N ~ ~ y Ul U '.. N O C O U O.N. U~ C £ ~ ~ m _ O O U rT] _ O ~ N O ~ N L ~ p ' ~ a m 3 Q E p U N o y G a ~ U r?` ~m o a ° ~ ° m iu ~ 2 a~ U ~' N ~ °' o ° ~ °w = o_ ~ ._ ~ ~ F- c7 o o_ Q ¢ a It is time to start looking at something other than the traditional 99 Vail st le X X y 100 A new building style will create diversity and increase Veil's X X identity . X 101 Traditional alpine architecture is what puts Vail on the map X X 102 Windows at ground level are inviting X X 103 Dislike the modern image X X 104 Consider incorporating new elements into the traditional architecture X X X 105 Keep in mind the traditional look that people expect from Vail X X 106 Focus on the function of the facility first and foremost X X 107 Concerned with possibility of wasted space in the natural design X X X 108 Focus on quality to ensure a timeless building X X The building needs to be able to adapt to the ever-changing 109 desires, of the resort business and doesn't necessarily need to be X X timeless 110 Like the fact that the modern rendering looks like a conference center X X 111 Concern with the construction/appearance of the roof element of X X the natural deign 112 Something "different" can work on this site X X X 113 Alpine feel is a part of Vail -consider the traditional approach with X some modern elements X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MDLTIPLIES THE EFFECT... P2g0 7 Ot 24 ®20.74 All RighLS Reserved By p:kunenl projectsl..Wrchileclural Design Style Comments.xls Archileclural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town Of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category .Brought up By N ~, N Question /Comment ~ ~ ~ ~° m _ °_' ~, ~ ~ ~ >. u~ ~ >, m ~ ~ r~ a~i E ~ :4 ~ m c o U m E o m ~' ~ O ~ N ~ a ° ~ P E E U ~ U w ~ v ~ Y m ~ ~ Z ° ~ U ~' U m ~ o ° ~ , ~ c ~ ~ C °' ~ N 11 F - 'o ~ Q p C7 ° ^ Q ~ a 114 Should focus the design more on traditional elements and less on X X modern ones 115 The building should work to connect the villages X X X 116 Believe the natural design can be built cost-effectively X X X 117 Should focus design efforts on the interior space X X 118 When broken up, interior space should be more square rather X X than long and narrow 11 g Consider the context of the adjacent structures such as the X X X parking structure 120 Concerned with how any of the designs tie into the parking X X X structure 121 Ensure natural light is incorporated in the interior spaces X X X 122 Account for sufficient floor loads trucks, etc. X X 123 Ceiling height of ballrooms should be 25 - 30' X 124 Prefer option with meeting rooms on the roof with views and X X X daylight incorporated 125 Still need to consider amulti-use non flat floor option X X - 126 Stacking diagrams C & D are the only feasible options X X X 127 Concerned with possibility of putting meeting rooms at the outsid t ti ildi d i l i /di f h b E Li h X X rac ng at c rc e -no se ons face o t e u . ons ea s 128 Ensure designs allow for daylighting X X TEAMWDRH DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANp MDLTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page $ Or 24 ©2Wd All Righls Reservetl By p:\cunenl projeclsl..WrchilecWral Design Syle Commenls.zls Archllectural Resource Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category - Brougnt up ey ry N C N Question /Comment Y , ~ w ~ m _ ~' N ~ m ~ >. rn C ~ w cn ~ Y t~ ~ aci E ~ iv :4 ~ m ~ c o U m ' E o w ~ C O ~ v, Y .~ a o ~ ,!p ~ t= Q o U C ~ ~ U ~ p W a d p U ~ N o = d 0 d 0 ~ N ~ `` ~ Z ~ U ~ °' C m o F' ro '> ~ ~- ~ c7 c~ o ¢ a~ 129 Public spaces should be arranged at the exterior face of the X X building If at all possible, the kitchen should be placed on the same level 130 X X as the ballrooms 131 I am a very strong supporter of the "Traditional Vail vernacular X X . style" (Architectural Vision #1) The Traditional Vail vernacular style represents Vail in ways the 132 other choices do not. The Vail community is squandering a great X X opportunity to tie the Village to Lionshead by choosing anything other than option #1. The "popular" choice of option #3 ("Inspired by Nature') would be a great choice if Vail was a national park. But we are not a park; 133 we are a resort community and this conference center is a great X X opportunity for us to serve both of these niches -resort & community. Please keep in mind the needs of visitors, meeting planners and meeting attendees (the ultimate end-user and customer) of the conference center when choosing the design. The conference center must be able to stand the test of time. While "Option 3" 134 may seem like a novel and new idea, the same could have been X X said about Lionshead Village when it was built. Thirty years later, Lionshead is badly outdated and scheduled for a complete facelift. I'm afraid the same would happen to this conference center if you select Option 3. The new conference center needs to be a part of Vail, and that includes the need to ensure that the center feels like Vail and fits 135 X X in the Vail architecture and design style. Option 1 is the best choice! 136 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 137 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 138 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 9 4F 2Q ®200J All Rights Reservetl By p:kurrenl projects\...Wrchileclural Design Style Commenls.xls Archileclural Resource Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 TOWn of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By (p N C N N Question /Comment ~ N ~ N ° ~ 01 ~' `~ ~ Q 1 ° (n ~ ..T. rn ~ cn d .J ~~ C N E N :N 'j m O C o U m E o N ~ ~ N C O ~ N .L] a c ° m E E U c (~ w 0! U ~ a Y ~ =o m o g m Z o° ~, U ~' v ~ °' o 3 ~ `o w x a ~ ° c o ~ ~ ° o ¢ ° a 139 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 140 Prefer the iraditibnal design (sarne form letter from 'i 3'i'- 135) X - 141 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 142, Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 143 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 144 The natural design blends with the environment X X 145 The building should not be intrusive X X X 146 Natural, stone materials should be incorporated X X 147 It would be nice to blend the two villages X X X 148 The modern image looks too much like old Lionshead X X 149 The traditional design looks too much like the Vilar Center X ( X 150 The natural design is beautiful yet unique and is preferred X X 151 Natural, stone, wood materials should be incorporated X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ~~ OI 24 B 2g0d All Rights Reserved By v:lairrenl vrviecls~..Wrchileclural Design Style Cvmmenls.als ~ Archilequral Resourca Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By Question /Comment ~ N _ ~ y ° ~ m ' N ~. in ~ ~ ~ N ~ U ~' ~ E E C ~ E N D c > m V j U w ~ E U n ~ N 3 p ~ Y S] ~ 0_ a o m ~ m a E ~ U U o ~ ~ u ~ o a o ~, o o S o d o ~ 'c ~ ~ ~ Z N ~ d v7 pl ~~, O a` F- !!~ ~ ~ a U ~ ~ ~ c~ o ¢ a 152 Modern or natural images are preferred X X X 153 Do we really need more traditional buildings? X X 154 Copper panels, steel, glass should be used X X 155 Need additional detail on the natural design X X 156 Like the traditional design -should blend with the theme of Vail X X 157 Stone & wood should be incorporated X X 158 Traditional mountain style should be used which mariy people come to Vail and the mountains to experience X X 159 Like the traditional design in that it is timeless and is more consistent with the New Lionshead X X 160 Dislike the glass in the modern design - we don't need an "icon" that will look as dated as Lionshead does now. X X 161 Don't like the "snowcone" -unlike the sandstone museum, this X building is in town, not on the mountain X 162 The lighted tree is ludicrous and will create light pollution X X 163 Natural materials -stone, wood, stucco should be used X X "Icons" are dramatic statements or memorable ones. Vail is too 164 small for "drama" and should ~o for "memorable" -like the clock tower, the 10th mountain divisjQn statue, the covered bridge. X ~ X "Drama" can get very dated. 165 The site can not connect the villages. At best it can extend Lionshead and file the library in to the Lionshead area X X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 11 Of 24 82004 All Rights Raservetl 0y p:kurrenl projects\...WChileclural Design Style Commenls.xls Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakehoider Meeting Comments 0'L DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By Question /Comment ~ ~ N ~ N N C ~ _ ~ N ~ . ~ N ~y >. N m Y ~ Y ~ U ~ ~ c ~~ ~ °> E ~ ~ ~ c m ~~ = o U m E E o N ~ . ~ 3 O ~ N ~ ~ o- c ~v E Q E o U w c U N N U c w o_ d= ~ U ~. ~ o a o " `o m ~ ~ z ~ U ~' ~ o o y = a ~ ~ ~ o G li The traditional style doesn't fee right -despite the look of the 166 X X village 167 The modern is a good combination of "modern" with a good use X X of lines 168 The natural design would fit if it were nestled in the mountains X X 169 Stone ,metal, and glass should be used X X Prefer the idea of keeping the villages separate with two distinct 170 X X X and appealing architectural styles I just saw the three versions of the convention center and would Tike to comment as a 12 year employee on the mountain and Vail resident for many years. Version 3 "Inspired by Nature' is the 171 X X clear choice to set Vail apart the cookie cutter villages of Beaver Creek, Copper, Whistler, and Keystone. We shouldn't require architectural clues for people to realize we're in the mountains. It's time for Vail to step away from its ersatz euro alpine feel and make a statement. We must display pride in our alpine Rocky Mtn. roots and develop our own identity derived from the beauty 172 around us. "The house on the sketches had been designed not X X by Roark, but by the cliff on which it stood. It was as if the cliff had grown and completed itself and proclaimed the purpose for which it had been waiting." Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead. , really like the Vision 3 Inspired by Nature. This fits our 173 environment and makes a powerful statement for the spirit of Vail. X X Please do something with the LH parking structure to match. 174 Energy efficiency is important X X 175 Prefer the natural design X X 176 Prefer the traditional design X X 177 Prefer the natural, different look as compared to the traditional X X 178 Like the natural design but dislike the cone structure X X TEAMWORH DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ~2 OT ZG m2~M All Rghls ReserveC By p:\cunenl prolecls\...Wrrhileclural pesign Style Commenls.xls Archileclural Resourw Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought up sy N N Question /Comment ~ _ ~ ° ~ ° ~ N _ lA `° ~ U ~ w cn ~~ r~ P E d E E m ~ ~' ~O ~ m ~ c o U m _ E E o N ~ ~ c 3 O ~ m a d m «~c. Q E U c (J w U e W d K ~ U Z, ~ o 0 Y 0 ~ o ~ m Z m U a> m c m ~ o ` 0 H 0 v~ = d ~ v c ~ ~ ~ O `n ~~ a -'o Q d :n a o 179 The traditional option is the safest X X 180 Like the possibility of the natural design but the roof is concerning. Need to ensure it looks good in the summer X X 181 Prefer the natural design but it must look good year round X X 182 Prefer to keep the traditional look X X 183 Like the glass of the contemporary design X X 184 Prefer the natural design X X 185 Prefer the traditional design X X 186 Prefer a more contemporary feel X X 187 Want more info on the natural design -can it be pulled off? X X , 188 Need to ensure "green" construction X X . 189 Need to incorporate "green" building techniques X X 190 Any image chosen must be genuine X X 191 The traditional image is safe X X 192 It seems hard to relate the natural design to the adjacent properties X X X 193 Prefer the natural design X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANO MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Pe9e 'I3 Of ZA ®100J All Rights Reservetl By p:lcurtenl pmjeclsl..Mrchiteclural Design Styie Cammants.xis Archlleclural Resource Gonsullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category .Brought up By _ Question /Comment ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~, _ ~ °_' a ~ rn ~ ~ cn ~ .a. m' d ~ L~ a=i E m ~ -~ m c a U m E o y . `v = O ~ N a a _ ~ E E c ~ U w ~ U ~ a Y. ` ~ .o ~ ~ 2 Q o ~ U U m ~ = ~ = o d O ~, N o = o a` o ~ ~ ~ `` ~ ~ rn o F- •> '~ ~- C7 U ~ o ¢ ~ a 194 Prefer the natural design X r X 195 The natural design needs further development X X 196 Like the organic form of natural option X X 197 Conference center should stand out X X 198 Prefer the incorporation of a lot of glass X X 199 Prefer the traditional because it blends with the existing X X architecture of Vail 200 Most of Vail is traditional - so why not this? X X 201 The natural design is so much different than what we have - X X X concerned it might not fit in 202 Keeping in line with the rest of the traditional village makes sense X X Too much glass has been incorporated into the front of the 203 i diti l it X X ona -secur y ssue tra 204 Dislike the modern image X X 205 Like the natural design and cornice but does it fit the site? X ~ X X Like the concept of the natural design but the image is too vague 206 i t it f ll X ~ X a e to u y apprec ~ 207 Can we afford the natural design? X X Be careful to not bog down the process getting the natural image X X 208 lust right" TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 1G D( 2G ®2004 All Rights Reserved By p:~cunent prolectsl..V+rchitecWral pesign Style Commenls.xls Archilecwral Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up By N C N Question /Comment ~ {` ~ ~; ° ~ N ~' N (n m ..~. ~ .~.. m N ~ °c' N E N ~ ° m c o' U m ~E o ` ~ C O ~ N d n- o ' ~ ° ~ E Q E o U c ° m w U c W a ~ D U ~, ~ o a 0 Y 0 m ~ (` o ~' ° Z `` U. ° c ~ o o = d ~ U c ~ C ~ ~ ~ a ~ > ~ a U o ¢ a -The Jackson design fits will into the hillside, but does the 209 conference center site have enough topography to pull off X X X something like this? 210 Make the cone element larger than the Wal-Mart flagpole. Will it X be lit 24-7? Who will clean the glass? X 211 The natural option is appealing reaches back to heritage of X Colorado -way back - Anasazi, etc. X 212 Make it look like old casino building -traditional X X 213 The modern design looks too much like downtown Seattle -stay X away from it -too urban X 214 The natural design could look cool or be a disaster X X 215 "Nature gone wrong" cone X X 216 The natural design is original and interesting X X 217 The modern design looks like an enclosed parking structure - X yuck! X 218 The traditional complements the village architecture -elegant and X sophisticated X X 219 The natural design is too far out -will turn off attendees -too cutesy X X 220 The modern is too modern -looks like the parking structure X X 221 The traditional is ok -should stay with the alpine theme to create X synergy X X 222 The natural is inconsistent with the existing ToV architecture. X X X 223 Stick with the theme of Vail - no need to do anything different X X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page iS 0( Z4 ®2004 All Rights Raservetl By p:kunenl projec~sl...l4rchileclural pesign Style Commenls.~ls Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By N N Question /Comment ~ _ ~ ° ~ Q1 =' (n ~ .~. cn .~'. <n ~ C r ~, N E U1 's ~ m C o ~ m ~ o N u, ~ p ~ ~ N ~ a C C a (6 ~ ~~ m a E U C U ~ ~ U W °- d' ~ U ~' N ° C1 P Y ° ~ z ~ ~ ~ 3 •N = a V ~ t` c ~ ~ o a ~ ~ ¢ t' o Q a' 224 The natural design has a potential to be a symbol for Vail and is X X original and interesting Be careful with the traditional design -could become dated and 225 X X looks like the shopping district 226 The traditional is a good fif -consistent with the existing X X X architecture 227 The natural design could be an eyesore if not done rights X X 228 Like the proposed use of natural forms X X 229 Like the amount o f glass in the modern option X X 230 Should stand out from Vail architecture X X 231 Should have fun with the design X X 232 Should flow with the immediate surroundings but not match the X X X traditional Vail architecture 233 People come to Vail expecting the traditional look X X 234 Should be an architectural icon X X 235 Needs to work with adjacent buildings /structures X X X 236 Modern does not work in Vail X X 237 Seamless experience - go with what's proven X X 238 One vision of Vail X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ~6 Of 24 02004 All Rights Reservetl 8y p:kvnenl projects\...WChitectural Design Style Dommenls.xls Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By N N Question /Comment ~ ~ N ~ m ~ ' ~ w ~ w to m ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ w ~~ C o E (O ~ ~ ~ ~ m 'U c 'o U m _ E o m ~ ~ c O ~ N U a a co c ~ E o c N U W ~ U d n Y m m o ~ m Z ~ U o ~ c ~ o o N~ = d ~' v d ~ aci ~ al ~~ d F a v ¢ j U ~ o ¢ a Continue to consider multi-use space and options for sloped 239 floors - X X 240 OK to separate lionshead and Vail village X X X 241 Ok to consider the modern design /elements X X 242 Need windows in ballrooms with operable shades X X 243 Good to blend forms /materials with the natural environment X X 244 Doesn't need to match the existing Vail architecture X X 245 Should stand out from Vail architecture X X 246 Not another Beaver Creek X X 247 Modern design already appears dated X X 248 Need further development of the natural option X X ' 249 Prefer the traditional look X X 250 The natural design needs further development X X 251 Like the glass of the modern option but not the overall style X X . 252 Prefer the natural design X X 253 Prefer a building that fits the environment as opposed to the existing Vail style X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES TMB EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ~ 7 Of 24 ©20ga pJl Rights Reservetl By p:kurrent protects\...UrchilecWral Design Syle Commenls.rls Ard~i\eclu(a1 Rescurce Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 0'1_ DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By ` N Question /Comment N ° 7 N i; - ~ - ~ / N _ -• J. V1 N .~"+ rn Q1 ~ ~ U .V. s~ Q1 E N N -~ 01 ~ m C o _ E E N ~ N C 3 ~ _ ~ ~ .- .O d c p c ~ ~ ~ E Q E E U ~ ~ ~ U c w d K ~ U > •m p o -~ o ~. o = m~ ~ rj m ~ c ~ o , N = d ~ ~ t- Z N ~ `n ~ ~, O a` ~ o ~ ¢ V n ~ ~ o ¢ a 254 Prefer natural, traditional, then modern X X Doesn't need to tie into the existing architecture due to its isolated 255 X location X ' 256 Prefer the traditional look • X X 257 Modern doesn't work here X X 258 Prefer the natural design X X 259 Modern is too far out there X X 260 Traditional is a little too bland X X 261 Prefer the natural style X X 262 Prefer the natural design X X 263 Concerned with the balconies at the S. elevation -noise etc X X affecting adjacent properties 264 Like the potential of the natural style X X 265 Should stand out X X 266 Like the unique modern structure X ~ X 267 Like the use of glass proposed in the modern option X X 268 Like materials proposed for the natural X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ~ 8 Ot 24 ®2001 All Rights Reserved By p:kurzem projeclsl..Wrhiteclural OesS^ Style Comments.xls Arc.iilectural Resour,,e Gpnsullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 TOWn of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By to C y Question /Comment Y ~, (p ~ w ~ m _ N ~' N Y to ~ ~ ~. in m ~ r~ ~ a~i E ~ a~ :`? c ~ m ~ c 'o U m ~ o rn d ~ ~ O ~ N ~ a v m w E Q o ~ v ~ U ` ul a ~ ° U ~ ~ ° = a ° Y ° ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ z ~ U C _ ~' ~ ~ ~~ o o ~ N ' a Q ~ ~ i a ~ o n. ~ a n a 269 Prefer the traditional but intrigued by the Natural X X X 270 Traditional feels like Vail X X 271 Modern is too angular X X 272 Natural needs more development X X 273 Make it "acoustically good" X X 274 Allow it to hold 2000 (concert crowd) X X 275 We live in the middle of nature -the natural design fits X X The traditional design is, by far, the best choice for the conference center. It embodies the look and feel of Vail (albeit, 276 X X an updated Vail) and would be a place that would attract people to Vail and the center. The modern design is not appropriate for a Vail conference center. Its modern architecture seems to contradict our Rocky Mountain surroundings and the design seems very cold in 277 appearance. Considering Vail endures a cold alpine climate fora X X good portion of the year, a place that looks more warm and inviting seems more logical from a draw standpoint (a place that brings people in) and an aesthetic standpoint. The natural design is okay but seems a little over the top with the illuminated cone and snow-capped ridge. The surrounding snow 278 capped mountains speak volumes over any "snow capped" ridge X X that may be incorporated in Vail's architecture. It seems like this design tries a little too hard to blend in. I am writing in regards to the Vail Conference Center.. I would like to express my opinion on the traditional design being the best for 279 the valley. I know that there are a lot of people interested in the X X natural design so 1 wanted to voice my opinion and support the traditional option. A choice of the traditional design, will serve to match the vision of 280 X X other buildings in the Lionshead area. TEAMWORK DNIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 1 J O( 24 ®20Da All Rights Resenretl By p:kunenl prolucls\...Wrtliileclural Design Style Commenls.xls Architectural Resource Conwtlanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By N N Question /Comment ~ _ ~ ° ~ ° ~ ~' "_' y m m ~ o in ~ in ~ y s ~ °' E c E E ~ ~ w ~ m _ .U ~ o U m E o y ~ m 3 G ~ y .v a a o =o E ~ o m ? m ¢ o m U c ~ ~ U ~ o w n. o_ p U ~ 0 ~ o 2 ~ 0 a Y 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z V m ~ ~ -' U ~ m .N ~ o n` ~ !n -'o ~ ¢ e ~ d U c~ o a a' 281 The modern design looks like a Ray Bradbury building, nothing to X do with Vail. X 282 The natural design will look so funny in the summer with a fake X snow covered roof. X Like the windows in the modern design -they can be used for a 283 X renewable energy source to help create a "green building" h 284 I like the glass and windows in the modern design X X 285 The natural design will blend in too much. X X Need something that screams "modern convention center" like 286 X ~~ the modern design. 287 Need to let people see out and in X X 288 Need to do something that will be featured in "Architectural X X Digest" like the natural option. 289 Need to consider the context of the area. Needs to be unique X ,{ and say Vail TEAMWORH DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Pd9e 2O O( Z4 ®2004 PJI Rights Reserved By Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall Coriference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By m N c N Question /Comment ~ N `_ ~, ° ~ m ~ ' `~ ~ d __ ° ..T. rA ~ .~. ~ N „T, ~ U N ~N.. c r o ~ C m E E c0 ~ :D c ~ ~ m ~ .U c ° o w ~ _ E E U N m ~ N c 3 a j ~ ' ._ ~ ° a c '~ E -°° ~ ~ E Q E ~ U ° ~ y ~ U c d O m o 2 ° p 3 m ~ ~ o ~ ° Z ~j d ° m O 0 ~ 0 !? a ~ U c ~ ~ o a a' 290 Consider locating not-for-profit offices within the conference center to create year-round vibrancy X X 291 Reduce the amount of'break out area and create some raked seating lecture halls X X 292 If the information center is incorporated, it needs to be world clas - something I would bring my mom to see to get oriented to Vail. X X 293 Incorporate some retail space X 294 The alpine look is too far away from the village to tie in X X X The modern look is very attractive, but not functional -glass 295 needs a lot of maintenance and requires shading. X Sun=head=bright glare. Think about exhibitors needs with visual X presentations. 296 The natural look is my favorite. It might require some modification -maybe combine a little alpine with nature. X X 297 As much natural material as possible should be used. Needs to be low maintenance. Maybe stonework & artificial woods X X 298 Need a building to be proud of. X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page Z'I Of Z4 07009 All Rights ReserveW By p?cunenl prgeclsl..WUiileelural Design Syle Comments.zls Archileclural Resource Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brougnt up By (p N C N y N Question /Comment Y ~, ~ ~ ~° ~, _ ~' rn c0 ~ U C ~ ~ U N r C ~ N ~ N E E ~ ~ j m C O U m ~ E O y ~ C O ~ N y J] d C ~ v N ~ E Q E U C p ~ U c ~ W d R ~ U ~ d o S ~. p Q. p ~ N ~ ~ Z N U d ~ C p y ~ ~ o ¢ li Needs to be quiet -traffic pattern needs to be carefully thought through. For the current capacity one needs to be prepared for 299 groups of 2000 - 3000 persons. Loading pattern s require limits X X of 15 minutes for all. I miss a loading dock area. Should be able to handle 2 - 18 wheelers at a time. Do not underestimate waste management /handling 300 Ease of access is of utmost importance =infrastructure. X X Vail can not handle the lodging need this will bring, thus transportation is needed -buses, vans, taxis, conference cars. 301 Transportation pattern and flow are very important for meeting X X planners, as nobody wants to start a conference with complaints about logistics. Also it will keep people in town longer If possible a successful conference facility should bean 302 architectural icon that the community would be proud of. It also X X needs to have an element of design that allows it to age gracefully. The challenge is that in many cases icons do not age gracefully (the what were they thinking when they built this syndrome). It takes a unique and careful design to fulfill this requirement. In the case of the three renderings currently being discussed I am not sure that any of them meet this criteria. If you are unable to achieve the nearly impossible (an icon that ages well, i.e. the 303 Sydney opera house as an example) due to budget constraints, X X no compelling design, etc. then you fall back into the camp of , building somethirig that fits within the community (particularly the vision of the community we will enjoy post Lionshead redevelopment, post front door redevelopment, post Four Season development, post Cross Roads redevelopment). I am not sure we have had that option fully explored (multiple renderings) for the community to consider this as an alternative. I will repeat my concern that a design that is not in line with the Bavarian theme of the "New Dawn" of Vail both in the Village and 304 in Lionshead will seem out of place and in a few years will be out X X of date as well. It seems that for some reason the marketing of this process is stacked in favor of the "Natural" design; even the terms "traditional" and "contemporary" seem lame compared to the ter 305 Natural" as if the first two are sort of "unnatural". At least the " X X Bavarian" so someone was initial word for traditional was thinking (even if the initial drawing was just a box) and of course the "Contemporary" looks like the Subway building which everyone hates. TEAMYJORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANO MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ZZ OF Z4 ®200< qll Rghts Reservetl By .. uii,.on~ n.nia~t~\ Nr,i,~iwr~.~i,ral flnsian Stvle Commenls.xls ~ Ncliileclural Resourco Cmsultan~s, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By N c h Question /Comment ~ N _ ~, ° ~ g) ~' B N • U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~~ °c' E m E a`~ y ~ m c o U m E o y ~ c O ~ y a d c o ~ o ~ = ~° Q E '~ CJ c o N U c o w o_ D! ~ U ~ ~ o = a 0 d Y 0 ~ ~ ~ m ~ U ~ c ~ a ~ a d c7 o a a My suggestion is that someone sit with the architects of the Sonnenalp property and of the Lionshead Core and see if something can be designed that is both harmonious with the new 306 improvements and is also dramatic and distinctive, which seems X X X to be what underlies the Natural concept. As it stands, the "Natural" looks more appropriate for Disneyland than for a skiing destination with a predominately alpine/Bavarian design. The traditional style is dated and would be the last design in the 307 X Beaver Creek dev. Style X 308 The modern design.is smart, modern, different, striking, very X attractive and very buildable X 309 The natural design looks like a cave or tomb, uninspired, X depressing X 310 Materials should be green like Aspen if we can afford it X X Function should come first - "architectural icons" could be too 311 custom and costly -rather build green & practical. Can't we be X X tasteful and practical? 312 Never felt a bridge between the villages was necessary -its all one village in my view. X . X 313 All three current "designs" are very unispired: ~ X X 314 The Traditional design is flat and plain, does not gracefully X interact with the street or the mountain. X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page Z3 OF 24 ®200a All Rlghls Reserved By p:lwrtenl projeclsl..WrchilecWral Design Slyle Commenls.xls Nthileclu2l Resource Consullanls, Int. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up By ( N C N N Question /Comment T p U ~ '~ ~ _ ~ ~ N _ U V) m O .a. rn O Y rn N .N. z a~i N E U) :s j m C 'o U m _ E E o y ~, _ C ~ U ~ ~ m .C] a ,~ 0 _ ~ O rG N Z m U O C O O O N = d ~ V ~ H C ~ .m a ~ ~ ~ ¢ , Ur i9 0o 2 a The Contemporary design is any but that, does not incorporate 315 X X ingenuity, complexity, depth, interest and looks like the Minnesota airport from the 1970's. The "Natural" looks like little Hobbits should come running out. A 316 Ronchamp gone bad. (Re; Le Corbusier) X X 317 My first choice would be #3 Inspired by Nature X X 318 My second choice would be #1 Traditional Vail Vernacular X X My vote is for design #3 as first choice. I really like the way the design imitates our natural environment. It is also a very strong 319 plus to have the glass cone that will be easily seen from the X highway-it helps people to find their way and creates some excitement as they get closer to it. 320 My second choice is #1-the Bavarian look that already dominates X our architecture in Vail. I do not care for #2 Modern. Doesn't at all fit with what we have architecturally and seems not to have any meaningful raison X 321 d'etre . TENMWORK OIVI~ES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ZO Ot 2G ('.~ 2DU4 NI Rights Resenetl By ~os~ ~~pa~°iso~ s~rnrnar~ of ~~ ~ rev ~o Budget Summary ToV Conference Center 01 DEC 04 Description Original Budget 10 JUN 04 Bavarian Scheme 1 Natural Scheme 3 Comments Inflation @ 16% this year; Loading and Subtotal Hard Construction Costs 34,478,431 35,515,662 36,315,662 delivery now underground; 30 additional displaced parking spaces Professional Fees 4,234,532 3,279,258 3,279,258 Excellent procurement process Owner Soft Costs 2,735,000 3,646,114 3,646,114 Tap fee negotiations could save $500,000 here Contingency 2,387,203 2,432,635 2,432,635 Subtotal Soft Costs 9,356,734 9,358,007 9,358,007 Value Engineering Requirement N/A (1,244,785) (2,044,785) Total Project Costs 43,835,165 43,628,884 43,628,884 Interest rate increases Z:\projects\09 - ToV Conf Ctr\Estimates ©2004 All Rights Reserved by V\RC SummaryVlRC Budget Summary - O1 DEC 04 FINAL Page.1 of 1 Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. r~ ~~ter Phan ~urnrnary REASONS FOR DOING A MASTER PLAN The Master Plan for the Vail Conference Center and the Lionshead Parking Structure has been drafted in order to document the evolution of the conference center design concept and the process by which the design has been shaped by public input and review. Specifically, its purpose is: 1. To describe the rationale for design and site planning recommendations and, by doing so, create a framework for decision-making by Town officials charged with review of the conference center and other future development applications in the east Lionshead area. 2. To evaluate compliance with (or variance from) the goals and objectives of the adopted Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and other formally adopted municipal plans and policies that have relevance to the conference center site. 3. To demonstrate how specific contextual issues identified through public input, such as parking, traffic, and pedestrian connections, have been addressed in the schematic site plan for the new facility. 4. To identify and mitigate potentially negative impacts associated with the conference center, especially parking and circulation. CONFERENCE CENTER PROJECT GOALS The Master Plan for the Vail Conference Center is an acknowledgement that a facility of its size and with its potential to generate concentrated activity can have a considerable impact on the community and the neighborhood in which it will be located. Through the master planning process, the design team and Town staff have addressed the ways in which the project might further broader civic goals such as enhancing the urban design and economic vitality of the Town's commercial core areas and improving the functionality and appeal of the Town's fabric of landmarks, streets and pedestrian pathways. Specific goals of the Master Plan are: 1. To facilitate the development of a highly successful conference center. 2. To use the conference center project as an opportunity to create a strong and visible landmark as a welcoming portal for guests coming into Lionshead. 3. To connect the conference center to existing civic facilities (library, arena, hospital) in such a way that a strong civic "node" is created, helping to draw together the Vail Village and Lionshead core areas. 4. To improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation to and from the Lionshead parking structure and along East Lionshead Circle. Conference Center Advisory Committee 12/ 1 /04 ®~~~~~~ ®F THE ~~STE~ ~~~~ FOR THE !lAI~ CONFERENCE CENTER ,~N® THE ~90NSHEA® PARK9NG STRUCTURE a. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION This chapter explains the rationale for the master plan document and describes in general terms the project, the site, the overall regulatory context of applicable Town plans and policies, and the process that has been followed to encourage public involvement. A. Purpose of the Master Plan B. Project Goals C. Organization of the Master Plan Document D. Conference Center Project Description E. Description of the Site F. Applicable Community Plans and Goals G. Public Process 3 THE LIONSHEAD AREA AND CONSISTENCY !flIITH THE REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN This chapter details how the proposed conceptual design and site plan for the Vail Conference Center respond to the Town's goals for the character and vitality of the Lionshead part of town, as set forth in the 1998 Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. These larger goals emphasize the need for an increased level of activity in Lionshead, improved vehicular circulation systems, adequate public parking supply, a more interesting pedestrian corridor between Vail Village and Lionshead, and enhanced aesthetic quality of the built environment in Lionshead. A. Vehicular Circulation B. Parking C. Public Transit D. Service and Delivery E. The Pedestrian Environment 4 THE EAST LIONSHEAD i~EIGHBORHOOD: CONTEXTUAL ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS This chapter describes how the Vail Conference Center conceptual plan responds to the concerns of the immediate neighborhood around the conference center site. Key issues relate primarily to residents' desires to reduce vehicular traffic on East Lionshead Circle, to retain existing pedestrian connections, to avoid major impacts on their views, and to preserve future opportunities for private development. 5 DESIGN AND PROGRAM ISSUES SPECIFIC TO THE BUILDING This chapter addresses the development program and design concepts specific to the building itself. 6 ISSUES OUTSIDE THE PROJECT SCOPE This chapter discusses issues that cannot be resolved by the conference center project alone, including the location of needed public facilities such as additional parking and a transit center, and the off-site relocation of activities that will be displaced by the project. 7 IMPLEMENTATION This chapter discusses phasing, estimates development costs, and outlines recommended next steps. Conference Center Advisory Committee 12/ 1 /04 Remised: I~®vernber 270 2004 VAIN, ~'I A~TD EIi~IERGEl~1CY SERVICES P SEI~'I'~~'I®N PR®P®SAI., P®R RV / RESC~T~E VEI3ICI,ES o RESP®I~TS~ AI~~I.,~'~IS DROP®S~Il~ ~P~ ~I'I1~TG GITIDE~,II~TES PI ~~~IN~ ~~P~So QIJIREIVIEN'I'S o RESCI~/~R~o I~TV~I~T~'®R~ I.,IS~' QRV RESPONSE ANALYSIS FOR VAIL FIRE AND EIVIERGENCY SERVICES Executive Summary In response to a survey commissioned by the Town of Vail Council, the fire department was directed to place a Quick Response Vehicle (QRV) vehicle in service. The goal of this directive was to find a cost efficient alternative to the Type I fire apparatus that traditionally responds to emergency calls. Based on the aforementioned survey the council focused on out of district emergency calls on Vail Pass and medical calls as potential areas that the QRV could be utilized. The Vail Fire Department reviewed response criteria for vehicle accidents and medical calls and locations for the QRV. After the review the department determined that initial response of a QRV to out of district accidents was not as cost efficient as initially perceived based most importantly on firefighter safety, personnel needs and response from station two, which is currently the only viable storage facility. As a result of this analysis the department initiated steps to implement a "Rescue QRV." This vehicle offered the possibility of a cost efficient response to minor medicals and non emergency incidents. The criteria for .the rescue QRV response is based on defined dispatch information, placement of apparatus and the availability of trained personnel. A subsequent vehicle was also added to the Vail Fire fleet that enabled the development of a "Wildland QRV "as the cost efficient and safer alternative to the hybrid wildland response vehicle already in service. The wildland vehicle had already been in the "works" for several years and as the wildland problem had already been identified this vehicle was also initiated. In the spirit of the survey and the council directive to find cost efficient alternatives, the fire department decided to pursue the implementation of these two incident specific QRV's instead an accident QRV. Background ' Several sources were contacted concerning the usage of QRV's. General information revealed that in order for QRV's to be effective and cost efficient, they are generally designed to be response specific, such as a Rescue QRV or, a command QRV. Because of their specific design they are generally unsuited for other responses. Using this information and the recommendations of the survey the department determined the best direction to take with the design of the QRV. Based on factors such as council direction, survey recommendations, response criteria and call load, statistical potential and available facilities, the department decided to pursue arescue/medical QRV and a wildland QRV. r Implementation focus points o Implementation of consultant's recommendations specific to QRV response as cited in study is based on additional personnel and the completion of a third fire station in West Vail. o Vail Fire and Emergency Services proposed QRV strategies satisfy the recommendations of saving money and responding efficiently while not affecting the level of service or firefighter and civilian safety. o Proposed strategies also satisfy the medical call response of a QRV as described by consultant recommendations. o In addition, a QRV can serve as a standby vehicle or a secondary non-emergent response transfer vehicle for personnel and/or equipment in lieu of a Type 1 o Proposed QRV strategies currently satisfy some of the consultant recommendations without the addition of personnel and a third station and can be implemented immediately. o A complete QRV strategy is enabled upon the following: a. A completed West Vail Fire Station with 3 bays allowing for the housing of a Type 3/QRV in addition to a ladder truck and a Type 1 pumper. b. Full staffing of all stations allowing for a two personnel QRV response from Main Vail and a two personnel pumper standby, as well as a three personnel response from east and west Vail. c. All personnel responding in a rescue/QRV must be minimally qualified as an EMT and Firefighter 1. Rescue QRV points ~®st saviengs and effficiencg~ aatilizing existiaflg Il~escaae/~ItV ~ A rescue/QRV staffed, with two EMT-B's is currently capable of responding out of Station 2 on to the following possible calls Minor medical calls: Personnel (ENT's) assistance to ambulance Civilian assists/service calls not requiring full emergency response Helicopter assists: personnel assistance to Ambulance w/ Pumper standby o Other potential responses include: Non-life threatening injuries such as sprains, cuts and abrasions Service/Non-emergency calls added to rescue/QRV response protocol, allowing the traditional opportunities to serve (public expectation) Customer requests of unknown origin or description such as water leaks, downed trees, rock slides, flooding. Rescue/QRV specific emergency responses: Swift water rescues, off-road accidents/injuries, mountain rescue assists, Low angle evacuations, personnel requests. Cost savings: In 2002 the main Vail district responded to 486 medical calls, in 2003 the response was 465 medical calls. A savings on operating costs is expected by the use of a Rescue/QRV to a percentage of these calls. These costs include mileage and fuel costs as well as vehicle use. Wildland QRV points Cost Savings and Efficiency utilizing existing Wildland/QRV Emergency Response Plans currently being drafted by Town of Vail officials cite wildland fire as one of the greatest threats to the Vail Valley. Due to beetle kill and the projected problems associated with the current long term drought or "mega-drought", the United States Forest Service has identified a wildland fire on or around Vail Mountain as "eventually going to burn". • This issue had been anticipated and addressed by both Fleet and Fire. The Town of Vail now has the capability of responding immediately to a wildland fire with the appropriately trained and equipped firefighters and wildland QRV vehicle. This response is federally recognized (both personnel and equipment) as the appropriate initial attack for any wildland fire and has resulted in federaUstate grant allocations for equipment and fuel mitigation projects. • Misc points Appropriate equipment and manpower expenditure for quick attack on local area wildland fires. Increased range and wildland penetration without increased costs. Appropriate. level of response (Type 6) for mutual aid requests while keeping significant resources in town. (Type 1 and Type 7) Complete compatibility with all federal requirements allowing full participation by Town of Vail representatives in federally expanded emergencies within the district. ~AIII., ~'I E1~EIZGEI~CY SERVICE ~~'~ ®PEIt~TII~TG ~iJII-ELIl~E SUBJECT EFFECTIVE DATE RESCINDS QRV RESPONSE 12/01/2004 06/12/2004 REFERENCE NO. SCOPE: All emergency response personnel and administration using the rescue/QRV. IEnAJ>L~®SE: This SOG is designed to facilitate the use of rescue QRV's as an initial emergency response vehicle to minor medical incidents in place of type 1 engines as a cost efficient alternative, without compromising the safety of responders, the public, or at the expense of other emergency responses. Note. The rescue/QRV is an initial response emergency vehicle. All other emergency vehicles staffed for the day should prepare to respond to the incident with resources if needed. P®1[,1<C~': The OIC has the authority to designate either of the rescue specific QRV's as the initial response for minor medicals and any other non-emergency incidents, as long as the safety of the response personnel and the standard of care is not compromised and dispatch information is available and accurate. Minimum staffing for the rescue/QRV for these incidents is two (2) qualified EMT's with full PPE. The OIC must insure that a type 1 engine is still able to respond with a driver and a qualified firefighter to any other emergencies. If dispatch information does not provide a clear indication that the alarm is a minor medical emergency, then a type one engine will respond with full staffing to the emergency. Operational size-ups are required for all crews working on a rescue/QRV. All VF&ES emergency response protocols are in effect for any emergency incidents. At any time during arescue/QRV response, either the responding crew or the OIC may upgrade the call based on additional information. The rescue/QRV will be housed at Station two. The defined district for use of rescue/QRV is from the Booth Creek overpass at Aspen Lane to the west end of intermountain. ~.l GENERAL: All other reports of smoke and/or fire, alarms, major medicals, vehicle accidents, construction accidents, rescues, utility incidents, or any other major events will be handled by the type 1 engines and crews, unless; in the opinion of the OIC the incidents can be determined as minor and a crew of qualified personnel can respond safely to the scene in a rescue/QRV. GUIDELINES: If dispatch information warrants and policy criteria have been met, the following procedures should be used to put the rescue/QRV in service. 1. Once tones are received and the incident is within the parameters of a rescue/QRV response, i.e. adequate dispatch information, then arescue/QRV will be designated as the initial response vehicle for the incident. 2. Two EMT'S will be assigned to a rescue/QRV, with the responsibility to respond to minor medicals, or other incidents as assigned. 3. The rescue/QRV will go on scene and initiate the Incident Command System. 4. As soon as possible the rescue/QRV IC will give an operational size-up and whether or not additional resources are needed. 5. Additional operational size-ups will be given as needed, or as the incident allows. 6. When the incident is nearing termination the rescue/QRV incident commander will give the approximate time for clearing the incident to the OIC. If other agencies are present, then the rescue/QRV incident commander will release the scene to the next priority IC and clear the scene. 8. In the case of multiple incidents the rescue/QRV will make every effort to clear the scene to respond to other calls. During minor medicals the rescue/QRV crew must be released by the medical incident commander and OIC prior to responding to these multiple incidents. SAFETY: Nothing in this SOG is intended to limit the OIC'S latitude to adjust response protocol for the safety of the personnel, the public or the community. According to the Department of the Interior the following are the requirements for the different classes of apparatus: ~' ~ ~tructurafl engine with nainianaIl paagnp capacity ®ff fl000 ~PI~ 400 Gallon water tank 200 feet of 1-inch hose 400 feet of 1-1 /2 inch hose 1200 feet of 2-1/2 inch hose At least 20 feet of ladder Ilteganires a rririanaIl crew ®ff 4 ~ ~' ~tr~actu~ral engine with ~ninirnall ptnanp capacity ®ff 500 fGP1Vfl 400 gallon tank 300 feet of 1-inch hose 500 feet of 1-1/2 inch hose 1000 feet of 2-1/2 inch hose 20 feet of ladder 1[~equires a unininyaIl crew ®ff 3 ~nidIlanaIl engines (Ahillity t® nn®ve and purnp) EI~T~II~E_~'~'PES ~ 'Y'IIlZgT ~ A12E ItEC®G1yIZlEi) AS QRV9S (SPECIFIC~g IEe WII.,I)I.,A1~TI), ItESCLJE, and ACCII)ElS'I' '~' e ~ ~iIldIlandl engine witlln nninianaIl pump capacity ®ff fl20 ~~1Vg 500 gallon tank 800 feet of 1-inch hose 1000 feet of 1-1/2 inch hose Gross vehicle weight rating generally greater than 20,000 pounds ll8equires a nninimall crew ®ff 3 (~Iig9atIly ®ver capacity as wifld9and rasp®nse-slightIly ann¢ler capacity as structaaral puannper) v Type 4 Wildland enguae with minimal pump capacity of 70 GPM 750 gallon tank 300 feet of 1-inch hose 300 feet of 1-1/2 inch hose Gross vehicle weight rating is in excess of 26,000 pounds Requires a minimum crew of 3 Type 5 Wildland engine with minimal pump capacity of 50 GPM 500 gallon tank 300 feet of 1-inch hose 300 feet of 1-1/2 inch hose Gross vehicle weight is between 16,000 to 26,000 pounds Requires a minimum crew of 3 Type 6 Initial attack wildland engine w/ minimal pump capacity of 50 GPM 200 gallon tank 300 feet of 1-inch hose 300 feet of 1-1/2 inch hose Gross vehicle weight between 9,000 to 16,000 pounds Requires a minimum crew of 2 Type 7 Light duty vehicle with minimal pump capacity of 20 GPM 125 gallon tank 200 feet of 1-inch and 1-1/2 inch hose Multi-purpose unit used for patrol, mop up, or initial attack Requires a minimum crew of 2 Q~~~Y / ~SC~e Eguipineng Invent®~ R>E~ ~ B>E>m o Stokes Basket and Backboard o Tool box o Airway /EMS Medical Bag o Extinguishers: o Dry Chemical o Light Water o Protein Foam BAClE~ R~EGH'~' ~®I~III~AR']C1~illE1~1~' 0 4 Class B Hazmat Suits 0 600 ft. Lifeline 0 60 ft. Self Rescue Rope I~DDL~ Rl{Gll~'~ ~®I~Ad8T1VIEl~1~' 0 3 small pulleys 0 6 steel carabineers 0 1 self rescue bag 0 1 Victim Harness w/ steel carabineer 0 1 pickoff strap 0 1 in. Webbing Bag 0 2 in. Webbing Bag o Prusiks Bag, 7 systems total 0 1 Chest Harness o Edge Protectors o Truck Cache: Haul System and Lowering System IFR®I~17f 1{~GH')i' C®I~IIIPAIi~~'l~l~'II' 0 1 Head Vise o Medical Glove Box o Automatic Defibrillation Device 0 1 Medical /EMS Bag o Suction Unit o Blankets CAII$ o Spot Light o Maps o Accountability Board (ICS) o SKED (back harness) o Digital camera t Back Left Compartment • 600 ft. Lifeline • Hydrant Wrench • Fuses MIDDLE LEFT COMPARTMENT • 4 PFD's (personal floatation device) • 4 Helmets • 4 Knives • 4 Whistles • 1 Set Flippers FRONT LEFT COMPARTMENT • Water Rescue Hardware with Webbing and Prusiks • 4 Wetsuits • Polypropylene Rope ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULED • Gas Detector • Heat Detector AWN OF YAK Town Clerk lO~dEI~®)EB~aI~1fl)t.TIV1[ TO: Town Council FROM: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk RE: .2005 Ford Park Managed Parking Calendar DATE: December 2, 2004 The 2005 Managed Parking Calendar Schedule for Ford Park is attached. This calendar has been compiled by the Ford Park User Committee from our meeting on November 29, 2004. We are requesting your review and approval of the calendar for paid parking dates at Ford Park for the Summer, 2005 schedule. There are currently 40 days of paid parking requested as well as one managed parking date. This calendar is subject to change as more events are added to the various schedules of the user groups at Ford Park. 75 South Frontage Road .Vail, Colorado 81657.970-479-2136/ FAX 970-479-2320 . www. vailgov. com a RECYCLED PAPER a 2005 Paid Parking Dates at Ford Park May 22 Saturday Managed Parking Only, VMS & PD June 03 Friday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD June 04 Saturday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. .Paid Parking, VMS & PD June OS Sunday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD June 14 Tuesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 20 Monday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 21 Tuesday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 22 Wednesday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 23 Thursday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 25 Saturday 7:00 a.rri.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 26 Sunday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 27 Monday .7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 28 Tuesday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD June 29 Wednesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMD & PD July O1 Friday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 02 Saturday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 03 Sunday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 04 Monday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July OS Tuesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 08 Friday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 pm Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 09 Saturday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 10 Sunday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 12 Tuesday 4:00 p.m.-8:OO p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 13 Wednesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 15 Friday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 16 Saturday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 17 Sunday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 19 Tuesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 22 Friday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 23 Saturday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 24 Sunday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 26 Tuesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 27 Wednesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 28 Thursday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 29 Friday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 30 Saturday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD July 31 Sunday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD August 02 Tuesday 4:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD August OS Friday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD August 06 Saturday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD August 07 Sunday 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Paid Parking, VMS & PD ~~~~ IT~~~ ~~~r~l ~~~~~IJC~~ Revised November~2~9//2004 at 2:25 p.m. ~G`-'cl i( SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY TOV: Town of Vail VAIL NATURE CENTER: VAIL NATURE CENTER: VAGF -Guided Tours VRD: Vail Recreation District 5122-1012 BEAVER POND TOUR through the Gardens every FP: Ford Park WILDFLOWER WALK Mon & Wed, 615 to 9128 Monday, Thursday & AF: Athletic Field daily from 1-2pm STARLIGHT ADVENTURE Saturday @ 10:30 am LBFP: Lower Bench of Ford Park MORNING BIRD WALK Wed, from 7:30 - 9 pm, throughout the summer VMS: Variable Message Sigro Fri,Sat & Sun, from 9-10 am, 611 to 9128 VOLUNTEER days on VAGF: Vail Alpine Garden Foundation 5122 to 1012 Monday and Thursdays at BRAVO gam-12pm GRFA: Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater HORTICULTURE Therapy VVF: Vail Valley Foundation classes -10am Tuesdays PD: Police Dept CHILDREN'S program 10:30 am on Wednesdays 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 18 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 19 VRD; AF Pepi's Soccer 20 GRFA -BMHS 21 Club 6-8p Club 6-8p Graduation Rehearsal - 10am-12pm VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer Club 6-8 22 BMHS -Graduation 23 24 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 25 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 26 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 27 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 28 10am - 3pm (ceremony at Club 6-8p VRD Club 6-8p 12:30 pm) PD managed parking only -VMS 29 30 31 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p 2005 FORD PARK SCHEDULE Revised November 29, 2004 at 2:25 p.m. JUNE SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 2 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 3 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 4 VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB GRFA -TEVA Mtn Games VRD -Boulder Girls Softball VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p Concert; 6pm 7a-7p -Tentative 5:30 - 8:00 p GRFA -TEVA Mtn Games Concert; 6pm PDIVMS PDIVMS Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 4-8 5 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 6 VRD - FP -Adult SB 7 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 8 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 9 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 10 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 11 VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p Club 12-4p 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD - FP -Adult SB GRFA -Maya Wedding - GRFA - Teva Mtn Games 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p 5:30 - 8:00 p tentative concert; 6pm 5:30 - 8:00 p GRFA -Hold for WF GRFA -Hold for WF VRD - FP Boulder Girls SB LBFP -Sara Ramsey??? 7a-lp -Tentative 3328-0965 PDIVMS Paid Parking 4-tap 12 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 13 VRD - FP -Adult SB 14 VRD: AF Rugby 6-Sp 15 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 16 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 17 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 18 VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p Club 12-4p 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD - AF King of Mtn VRD - AF King of Mtn GRFA -Hold for WF GRFA -Hold for WF 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p Volleyball 7a-8p Volleyball 7a-8p LBFP -Rebecca GRFA: Hot Summer Nights 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB VAGF - WeinerlKemp MannlCombs wedding; 10- 6:30p GRFA -Hold for Nick 5:30 - 8:00 p wedding - 80 pp; 3-6pm 1:00 p.m.; ceremony 11am Cavanah (30 pp) GRFA -Hold for Nick LBFP -Jane Kachadurian 30 pp; 720-332-5589; (fax- Cavanah wedding; 312-904-8704;130 720-332-0541) PDIVMS pp 6:30pm - 7:30pm Paid Parking 4-8p 19 VRD -AF King of Mtn 20 VRD - FP: Youth 21 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 22 VRD - FP: Youth 23 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 24 25 VRD - FP: Master Volleyball 7a-8p Lacrosse 7a-5p VRD - FP: Youth Lacrosse Lacrosse la-5p VRD - FP: Youth Lacrosse VRD - FP -Adult SB Lacrosse 7a-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB 7a-5p VRD - FP -Adult SB 7a-5p 530 - 8:00 p VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB GRFA - CML Conference VAGF &LBFP: Carpenter 5:30 - 8:00 p 5:30 - 8:00 pm Concert 5pm to 10pm; 350 Wedding; 3-6p;100 pp GRFA -Hold for Michelle at pp GRFA: Hot Summer Nights Operation Attitude; 250 pp 630p PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS Paid Parkin la-7p Paid Parking la-7p Paid Parkin 7a-7p Paid Parking 7a-7p Paid Parking 7a-7 JUNE Reuiccrl Nn~~omhor 7Q 9Md of 9~9F n m SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 26 GRFA: RPO at 6pm - 27 GRFA: RPO at 6pm - 28 29 GRFA: RPO at 6pm - 30 VRD - FP -Adult SB classical opening night Pops VRD - FP: Master Lacrosse Classical 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer Club VRD - FP: Master Lacrosse la-5p VRD - FP: Lacrosse Setup VRD - FP: Lacrosse setup 12-4p 7a-5p VRD - FP -Adult SB only only 7a-5p VRD - FP: Master Lacrosse VRD: FP Adult SB 5:30p-8p 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB la-8p 5:30 - 8:00 p GRFA: Hot Summer Nights 6:30p PD t VHflS PD ! VflflS PD I V~iS PD ! Vf>AS Paid Parkin 7a-7 Paid Parkin 7a-7 Paid Parkin 7a-y Paid Parkin ~ -8 ~nn5 FORD PARK SCHEDULE Revised November 29, 2004 at 2:25 p.m. JULY SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 GRFA: RPO at 6pm - 2 VRD - FP: Elite Classical Lacrosse 7a-8p VRD - FP: Elite Lacrosse 7a-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p VAGF -Bravo prelude in Children's garden; 65 pp 5:OOp-6p . PDIVMS Paid Parking 7a-7p PD 1 VMS Paid Parkin la-7 3 VRD - FP: Elite Lacrosse 4 VRD FP: Elite Lacrosse 5 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 6 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 7 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 8 GRFA: DSO at 6pm - 9 GRFA: DSO at 6pm - 7a-8p 7a-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB Classical opening night Classical GRFA - RPO Patriotic 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer Club 6- VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p concert 3:00 p.m. 4~h July Firework Celebration GRFA: Hot Summer Nights 5:30 - 8:00 p GRFA -Hold for Greta far 8p VAGF -Warner at Amphitheater and Softball 6:30p GRFA -Hold for Greta for Children's Theatre VRD - FP -Adult SB Wedding; 3-6pm; 100 pp Fields? LBFP Picnic Pav: American Children's Theatre 5:30 - 8:00 p Assoc of Attorneys & CPAs picnic; 50 pp;11am-3pm PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS Paid Parking la-lp Paid Parking 7a-7p Paid Parking 4-8p Paid Parking 4-8p Paid Parking 4-8p 10 GRFA -DSO concert at 11 VRD - FP -Adult SB 12 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 13 GRFA: DSO Concert 6p 14 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 15 GRFA: DSO 6p -Classical 16 GRFA: DSO 6p - 6pm -Pops 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB -Pops VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer Club 6- Carmen (closing night) VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer GRFA -Hold for Greta for 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 5:30 - 8:00 p 8p VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p Club 12-4p Children's Theatre GRFA: Hot Summer Nights Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD: FP Triple Crown 6:30p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p SB 7a-8p 5:30 - 8:00 p VAGF -Children's Garden VAGF -Pope Benefit 3- Bravo Performance Prelude; 5- 6p . 5:30 pm PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 7a-7 :IDLY SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY G~,~ u ,V~G SATURDAY) 17 VRD: FP Triple Crown 18 VRD - FP -Adult SB 19 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 20 21 22 GRFA - NYPO opening 23 GRFA -HYPO 6p- SB 7a-8p 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p night concert 6p -Classical Classical 5:30 - 8:00 p Club 6-8p VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer Club 6- VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p GRFA -Hold for Ken GRFA: Hat Summer Nights VRD - FP -Adult SB Club 6-8p 8p VRD - FP -Rocky Mtn ShapirolSteve Amerson? 6:30p 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD - FP -Adult SB Co-Ed Softball 8a-6p 5:30 - 8:00 p 5:30 - 8:00 p VAGF - Swett/Buckle VAGF - BrentlLivingwell; 3- LBFP -Picnic Pav -Jessica wedding; 30 pp;11a-1 p 6pm Price - 40 pp; 5p - 9pm 1-303- LBFPNAGF and Picnic 810-4376 Pavilion -Rachel Reiss - bbq rehearsal dinner, 3- 6pm (100+ pp) VAGF - Chiltlrens Garden -Bravo Performance Prelude ; 65 pp 5-5:30p PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS PDIVMS Paid Parkin ~a-7 Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin la-7 24 GRFA -HYPO - 6p - 25 VRD - FP -Adult SB 26 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 27 GRFA -HYPO - 6p - 28 GRFA -HYPO - 6p - 29 GRFA -HYPO 6p -Festive 30 GRFA -VIDF Classical 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB Festive Classics Classical Classics opening night 7:30p VRD - FP -Rocky Mtn Co- 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p VRD: AF Vail Invitational LBFP - WF (Arte) GAIA Etl Softball 8a-6p GRFA: Hot Summer Nights Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB Soccer Tournament 8a-8p VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 6:30p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD: AFIFP -Vail Club 12-4p GRFA -HYPO Youth 5:30 - 8:00 p 5:30 - 8:00 p Invitational Soccer 8a-8p Concert -11 am LBFP -Gala tent setup 8a-5p - tentative PDIVMS Paid Parking 7a-7p PD 1 VMS PD 1 VMS PD 1 VMS PD 1 VMS PD 1 VMS Paid Parkin 4.8 Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 4-8 Paid Parkin 7a-7 Paid Parkin 7a-7 31 LBFP - WF (Arte) gala tentative GRFA-VIDF Different Dimensions - 7:30 pm VRD: AFIFP -Vail Invitational Soccer 8a-8p VAGF - TrowbridgelDuncan Wedding; 3-6p; 50 pp PDNMS Paid Parkin 7a-7 2005 FORD PARK SCHEDULE Revised November 29, 2004 at 2:25 p.m. AUGUST SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY. 1 GRFA -VIDF -rehearsal 2 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 3 GRFA -VIDF rehearsal 4 GRFA - VIDF rehearsal 5 GRFA -VIDF 7:30p 6 VIDF - 7:30 pm VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 1.~RD: AF Rugby 6-8p VRD - FP -Kick It 3v3 VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p 5:30 - 8:00 p 5:30 - 8:00 p Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB soccer 7a-6p VRD - FP -Kick It 3v3 LBFP - WF (Arte) gala tear GRFA: Different VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB soccer 7a-6p down -tentative Dimensions; 7:30 pm 5:30 - 8:00 p 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD -Colorado Clay Court VRD -Colorado Clay Court Tennis Championships; 8a- PD 1 VMS Tennis Championships; 8a- 7p Paid Parking 4-8p 7p PDIVMS PDIVMS Paid Parkin 7a-7 Paid Parkin la-7 7 GRFA-VIDF Matinee at 8 ~ 9 10 11 12 13 1:30 pm VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p VRD - FP -Kick It 3v3 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB Club 6-8p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p GRFA -Hold for Greta.for soccer 7a-6p GRFA -Hold for Greta for 5:30 - 8:00 p VRD - FP -Adult SB 5:30 - 8:00 p Children's Theatre VRD -Colorado Clay Court Children's Theatre rehearsal GRFA -Hold for Greta for 5:30 - 8:00 p Tennis Championships; 8a- .Children's Theatre 7p PDNMS Paid Parkin 7a-7 14 15 VRD -Valley sports 16 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 17 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 18 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 19 20 VAGF- CasiaslMedina Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- VRD -Valley sports Assoc Club 6-Sp VRD -Valley sports Assoc VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p Wedding; 3-6pm; 75 pp 5:30p Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p VRD -Valley sports Assoc Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p LBFP -Peterson wedding; Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p 3-6pm; 150pp?(303-908- 9678 LBFP - LitalienlSchuchman wedding 6pm-7:30pm (ceremony at 7pm};100+pp 21 22 VRD -Valley sports 23 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 24 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 25 VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p 26 VRD: AF Pepi's Soccer 27 VRD: AF Rugby 1-5p Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- VRD -Valley sports Assoc Club 6-8p VRD -Valley sports Assoc Club 6-8p VAGF &LBFP -Swain ! 5:30p Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p VRD -Valley sports Assoc Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p Fliegelman wedding 3-6pm; Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p 150 pp 28 VAGF - MacMullan 29 VRD -Fall Softball 5:30- 30 VRD -Fall Softball 5:30- 31 VRD -Fall Softball 5:30- Wedding -12-3p -tentative 8p 8p 8p VRD -Valley sports Assoc VRD: AF Rugby 6-8p VRD -Valley sports Assoc Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p VRD -Valley sports Assoc Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p Youth Soccer; 4-5:30p ~0~~ ~~~~ p~~~ ~C~~[~®~~C~ Revised November 29, 2004 at 2:25 p.m. ~~p~~f~~ SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 VRD -Valley sports 2 3 LBFP -Stacy Frederick Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Wedding 3pm to 6pm 5:30p ceremony only wlcanopy;100+ pp VAGF - MannlMorbitre Wedding 3-6pm CONFLICT 4 5 VRD -Valley sports 6 VRD -Valley sports 7 VRD -Valley sports 8 VRD -Valley sports 9 10 Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p 11 12 VRD -Valley sports 13 VRD -Valley sports 14 VRD -Valley sports 15 VRD -Valley sports 16 17 Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p 18 19 VRD -Valley sports 20 VRD -Valley sports 21 VRD -Valley sports 22 VRD -Valley sports 23 24 Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-Sp 25 26 VRD -Valley sports 27 VRD -Valley sports 28 VRD.- Valley sports 29 VRD -Valley sports 30 VRD -Vail Valley Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Challenge Cup 8a-5p?? 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-8p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-Sp ,~ 2005 FORD PARK SCHEDULE Revised November 29, 2004 at 2:25 p.m. OCTOBER SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 VRD -Vail Valley Challen a Cu 8a-5 ?? 2 VRD -Vail Valley 3 VRD -Valley sports 4 VRD -Valley sports 5 VRD -Valley sports 6 VRD -Valley sports 7 8 Challenge Cup 8a-5p?? Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p 5:30p VRD -Fall Softball 5:30-Sp 9 10 VRD -Valley sports 11 VRD -Valley sports 12 VRD -Valley sports 13 VRD -Valley sports 14 15 Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 16 17 VRD -Valley sports 18 VRD -Valley sports 19 VRD -Valley sports 20 VRD -Valley sports 21 22 Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assac Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 23 24 VRD -Valley sports 25 VRD -Valley sports 26 VRD -Valley sports 27 VRD -Valley sports, 28 29 Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- Assac Youth Soccer; 4- Assoc Youth Soccer; 4- 5:30 5:30 5:30 5:30 30 ~ 31 f~IEPJIORANDUNi TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: December 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Second reading of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2004 Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge, represented by Zehren and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Manor Vail Lodge, represented by Zehren and Associates, is requesting a second reading of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2004, an ordinance establishing Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, and setting forth details in regard thereto. The purpose of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2004, is to facilitate the redevelopment of the Manor Vail Lodge, located at 595 Vail Valley Drive The staff and applicants are requesting that the Town Council lisfen to a presentation on the proposed ordinance and approve Ordinance Mo. 24, Series of 2004, upon second reading. II. B,4CKGROUND "`~ On September 13, 2004, the Town ' of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on a request to establish Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge.,. The applicants were requesting approval for the establishment of a new special development district with the following deviations: A maximum allowable building height of 57.4 feet versus 48 feet, An increase in allowable density to 25.7 units per acre versus 25 units per acre (6 dwelling units over allowable number of dwelling units), o An increase in allowable Gross Residential Floor Area to 164,321 square feet versus 139,630.5 square feet, and o Encroachments of cantilevered walkways on Building C onto Town Of Vail stream tract property measuring 34 square feet for each of four floors. Upon consideration of the request, the Commission voted 6-0-1 (Gunion recused) to forward a recommendation of approval of the request to the Vail Town Council. 1 The Commission's recommendation of approval includes sixteen (16) conditions of approval, as outlined in Section 4 of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2004. The Commission's recommendation of approval includes the following finding: "That the proposal to establish Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the Vail Town Code. Furthermore, the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission, based upon the testimony and evidence presented during the public hearing, that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided. Lastly, ths~ Commission finds that the request is consistent with the development goals and objectives of the Town. With regards to proposed building setbacks, that: a. Proposed .building setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. b. Proposed building setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations. c. Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. d. Proposed building setbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. e. Proposed building setbacks will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits That could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. With regards to proposed building height, that: a. Proposed building heights comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan. b. Proposed building height will provide adequately preserve views of the Gore Range from Vail Valley Drive. c. Proposed building height will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. d. Proposed building height .will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. That proposed gross residential floor area of 118% and additional seven dwelling units over allowable in the High Density Multiple-Family zone district is in conformance with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. ~ That the development is in compliance with the purposes of the High Density Multiple-Family zone district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable 2 elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the,Vail Land Use Plan, and the Vail Streetscape Master Plan, and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. " In the time since the September 13, 2004, Planning and Environmental Commission recommendation of approval the applicant has eliminated one dwelling unit and one elevator on the rear of Building C. Staff believes these changes are improvements to the proposal as .there is now a surplus of two parking spaces over that required and there is less proposed encroachment into the Town owned stream tract. On October 19, 2004, the Town Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2004, by a vote of 7-0. In conjunction with the approval the Council requested that the applicant and staff provide a copy of the proposed. Manor Vail Lodge Development Agreement. In addition, Council requested that " the applicant develop a program w~iich would` ericourdge the new units to be ~ '- included within the rental base of Manor Vail Lodge. It was requested by Council that staff explore in greater detail how the proposed $100,000 for streetscape improvements would be best utilized. To address Council's comments staff has attached a copy of the proposed Manor Vail Lodge Development Agreement. The agreement does not include any commitments to use the tennis courts for staging of materials. Greg Hall, of the Public Works Department, believes that their may be an opportunity to utilize the tennis courts in conjunction with the Town using the area for staging of the Village streetscape materials. If this option is utilized Greg Hall and the applicant will return before the Council with a proposal to utilize the tennis courts. The applicant has developed a program which the applicant believes will entice owners of the new condominiums to include their units in the Manor Vail rental program. Staff has attached the program which was created by the applicant. In general the program has created multiple attached accommodation units, 20 units, which are smaller one and two bedroom portions of the larger overall units. This will create the ability for an owner to rent all or a portion of their unit. In addition, the proposed program utilizes an incentive of $5,000 a year for up to 7 years which would go towards furnishings in the units. The program does not mandate that an owner participate in the rental program. Staff has researched how the proposed contribution of $100,000 would be best utilized to establish a streetscape plan and install those improvements along East Gore Creek Drive and Chalet Road. Staff estimates that all the base information survey work will cost $15,000 to $20,000. In regards to dedicating staff to guide the process of creating a master plan for the area it will be determined when the project gets started. It has been identified that staff may have time during the winter months, however, in the spring and summer staff will be focused on other public works projects such as the Village Streetscape. Staff will work to maintain as much of the $100,000 for actual installation of the improvements to East Gore Creek Drive and Chalet Road. The condition within the ordinance has been revised to contain greater detail on how the money will utilized. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Vail Towri Council approves Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2004, on second reading. IV. ATTACHMENTS A. Revised Ordinance 24, Series of 2004 B. Proposed plans for redevelopment dated October 19, 2004 C. Photo renderings of the proposed improvements D. Rental Program Proposal by the Applicant E. Manor Vail Lodge Development Agreement 4 ORDINANCE NO. 24 Series of 2004 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 38, MANOR VAIL LODGE, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE A, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT (SDD) DISTRICT, CHAPTER 9, TITLE 12, ZONING TITLE, TOl~IN CODE OF VAIL, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Title 12, Zoning Title, Chapter 9, Article A, Special Development (SDD) District, Town Code of Vail establishes a procedure for establishing special development districts; and _. WHEREAS, Manor Vail Lodge has submitted an application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department to establish Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, to facilitate the redevelopment of an existing lodge; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Towri of Vail held a public hearing on September 13, 2004, on the application to establish Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, in accordance with the provisions of the Town Code of Vail; and WHEREAS, upon due consideration, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail finds that the request complies with the design criteria prescribed in the Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and furthers the development objectives of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has forwarded a recommendation of approval by a vote of 6-0 (Gunion recused) of this request to the Vail Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that that the request to establish Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, complies with the design criteria prescribed in Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 Attachment: A the Title 12, Zoning Title, Town Code of Vail; and provides a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to adopt Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2004, and establish a new special development district in the Town of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. District Established ,,, ,. ,, .__ „Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail, Lodge, is established for development on one parcel of land, legally described as Lots A, Manor Vail Subdivision, which comprise a total of 232,932.4 square feet (5.347 acres) in the Vail Village area of the Town of Vail. Said parcels may be referred to as "SDD No. 38". Special Development District No 38 shall be reflected as such on the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail. The underlying zoning for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, shall be High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF) District. Section 2. Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, Approved _ Development Plan An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities of a special development district. The Vail Town Council finds that the Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, complies with each of the requirements set forth in Sections 12-9A-5 and 12-9A-6 of the Town Code of Vail. The Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, shall be comprised of materials submitted in accordance with Section 12-9A-5 of the Town Code of Vail and those plans prepared by Zehren and Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 2 Associates, entitled "Manor Vail Condominiums, Studio and Manor House Addition/Renovation", dated October 19, 2004. Section 3. Development Standards - In conjunction with the Approved Development Plan described in Section 2 herein, the following development standards are hereby approved by the Vail Town Council. These standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge. The development standards for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge are described below: A. Permitted, Conditional, and Accessory Uses: The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed-in Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, shall be those uses listed in Sections 12-6H-2, 12-6H- 3, and 12-6H-4 of the Towri Code of Vail, as may be amended. B. Lot Area: The minimum lot area for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, shall be 236,966.4 square feet (5.44 acres). C. Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, shall be as indicated on the Manor Vail Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. D. Height: The maximum allowable building height for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge shall be fifty-seven and four tenths (57.4'); and as indicated on the Manor Vail Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. E. Density Control: The maximum allowable Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) for Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, shall be 164,321 square feet and the maximum allowable density shall be one Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 3 V hundred forty (140) dwelling units, twenty (20) attached accommodation .units, and one (1) Type III Employee Housing Unit, and as indicated on the Manor Vail Lodge Approved Development Plan, dated October 19, 2004. Said Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) shall be allocated as follows: • Dwelling Unit (139) - 163,691.0 square feet o Type III Employee Housing Unit (1) - 630.0 square feet ' Total 164,321.0 square feet ,..... ,,.. F. Site coverage: The maximum allowable site coverage shall be forty,.and four tenths percent (40.4%) of the total lot area, and as indicated on the Manor Vail Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. G. Landscaping and Site Development: At least forty and a half percent (40.5%) or 95,979 square feet of the total lot area shall be landscaped. In no instance shall the hardscaped areas of the development site exceed twenty percent (20%) of the minimum landscaped area. The landscaping -- and site development shall be as indicated on the Manor Vail Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. H. Parking and Loading: The minimum number of off-street parking spaces shall be two hundred fifty-four (254) of which thirty-two (32) will be include in a private parking club and the minimum number of loading and delivery bays sha{I be two (2), and as indicated on the Manor Vail Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. Section 4. Conditions of Approval Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 4 The Applicant and Developer, agrees to comply to the following conditions of approval, which shall be part of the Town's approval of the establishment of Special Development District. No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge: Prior to Second Reading of Ordinance 1. That the developer meets with the Town'staff and prepares a memorandum of understanding outlining the responsibilities and requirements of the required off-site improvements, prior to second reading of the ordinance approving the establishment of Special Development District No 38, Manor Vail Lodge. This memorandum of understanding shall include, but not be limited to, all streetscape improvements along Vail Valley Drive and Hanson Ranch Road, details for the improvement of Mill Creek, and details fcr funding and establishment of a-Town of Vail St;-eetseape Master Plan for Gore Creek Drive east of Vail Valley Drive and Chalet Road. The Developer Improvement Agreement shall be signed by al! parties prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to Final DRB Review 2. That the developer submits a final exterior building materials list, typical wall section, architectural specifications, and a complete color rendering for review and approval of the Design Review Board, prior to submittal of an application for a building permit. 3. That the developer submits a rooftop mechanical equipment plan for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the overall design of the lodge and enclosed 'and visually screened from public view. Prior to Submittin for a Buildin Permit 4. That the developer shall provide detailed civil plans, profiles, details, limits of disturbance and construction fence for review and civil approval by the Department of Public Works, prior to submittal of a building permit. Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 5 5. That the developer addresses the written final comments of the Town of Vail Public Works Department outlined in the memorandum from the Town of Vail Public Works Department, dated September 2, 2004, prior to submitting an application to the Town of Vail Community Department for the issuance of a building permit for this project. 6. That the approval of the conditional use permits is not valid unless an ordinance approving the associated special development district amendment request is approved on second reading. 7. ~ That the developer shall be assessed an impact fee of $5.,000 for the net increase in p.m. traffic generation as determined by the Town of Vail Public Works Department, °. as addressed in Ata~i'im~i"it E o tre Septe~nb~:r 10, 2004, r~7emorandum. T"e applicant acknowledges and agrees that the Manor Vail Lodge Redevelopment will generate seventeen (17) additional peak trips and agrees to pay the Town a Traffic Impact Fee of $5, 000 per peak generated trip, for a total of $85, 000. The applicants further acknowledge and agree that the payment by East West to the Town of the entire amount of the Traffic Impact Fee ($85,000) -shall be a condition to the issuance of a building permit for the Manor Vai! Redevelopment. This fee shall be used to pay for public traffic improvements on the South Frontage Road, Vail Valley Drive, Chalet Road, and East Gore Creek Drive as deemed necessary to alleviate traffic impacts. 8. The applicant agrees to contribute $100,000 to the construction of streetscape improvement along Gore Creek Drive and Chalet Road. The Town and the applicant agree that the $100,000 contribution shall be deposited in an escrow account with instructions to restrict use of these funds to the streetscape improvement project in the above-referenced locations. Escrow instructions will also dictate that any potion of the $100, 000 remaining in the account the day after the 5-year anniversary of the initial contribution shall be refunded to the applicant. The Parties acknowledge that the Town will be responsible for leading and coordinating all aspects of the streetscape improvement project and thaf the applicant's role in the streetscape project is strictly limited to the contributions outlined above. The Town acknowledges that the streetscape improvement plan must be reviewed by the Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 6 neighboring homeowners associations and that the Town will reasonably incorporate feedback from these associations and the applicant into the final plan. The entire amount of the Sfreetscape Improvements to Gore Creek Drive and Chalet Road fee . ($100, 000) shall be paid by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Manor Vail Redevelopment. Prior to Requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 9. That the developer posts a bond to provide financial security for 125% of the total cost of the required off-site public improvements. The bond shall be in place with the _~ _ ._. `~ - - Town prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy. This includes but is,not limited to,the proposed raised pedestrian walkways across Vail Valley Drive, .._ . resurfacing of the tennis courts if granted permission to stage upon them, and Ford Park pedestrian pathway reconstruction. 10. That the developer shall prepare and submit all applicable roadway and drainage easements for dedication to the Town for review and approval by the Town Attorney. All easements shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. This includes but is not limited to the easement required for the relocated Ford Park pedestrian pathway. 11. That the developer provides deed-restricted housing that complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13) for a minimum of four (4) employees on the Manor Vail Lodge development site, and that said deed-restricted employee housing shall be made available for occupancy, and that the deed restrictions shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Manor Vail Lodge. The required Type III deed-restricted employee housing units shall not be eligible for resale and that the units be owned and operated by the hotel and that said ownership shall transfer with the deed to the hotel property. 12. That the developer receives an easement from the Town for. those improvements which would be located within Town of Vail property on tie rear of Building C. Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 7 13. That the parking club be limited to 32 spaces to allow for the elimination to the two parallel parking spaces to the north of Building A and the one parking space in the loading delivery area at the rear of Building B. That the sale of the parking spaces within the club occur as outlined in the proposal. 14. That the developer shall commence initial construction of the Manor Vail Lodge improvements within three years from the time of its final approval at second reading of the ordinance establishing Special Development District No. 38; and continue diligently toward the completion of the project. If the developer does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the special development district or any stage .. : of thespecial development dis±rict within the time !units irrpes^d; the approval cf . said special development district shall be void. The Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council shall review the special development district upon submittal of an application to reestablish the special development district following the procedures outlined in Section 12-9A-4, Vail Town Code. Section 5. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Vail Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts; sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 6. The Vail Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vait and the inhabitants thereof. The Council's finding, determination and declaration is based upon the review of the criteria prescribed by the Town Code of Vail and the evidence and testimony presented in consideration of this ordinance. Section 7. The amendment of~any provision of the Town Code of Vail as provided in ,~ Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 8. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 19th day of October, 2004 and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 7th day of December, 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. ATTEST: Rodriey Slifer, Mayor Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 7th day of December, 2004. ATTEST: Rodney Slifer, Mayor Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004 9 ~~~®~a va~L R~~~A~ P~®G~~ 1) Existing Lodging Performance Manor Vail has operated as a successful lodging property for years and, as has been noted, Manor Vail represents the standard upon which other condominium lodging operations in Vail strive to reach. With its existing hotel operating environment, meeting space and spa, Manor Vail is able to drive occupancy in the shoulder seasons through attracting group business. The existing complex consists of: • 76 -Studio Units ® 44 - 2BR Units • 16,000 sq. ft. of Meeting and Function Space (recently upgraded) 0 2,700 sq. ft. of Lobby/Front Desk • 9,200 sq. ft. of Support Offices and BOH • 3,200 sq. ft. Restaurant • 2,000 sq. ft. Spa In addition, Manor Vail features extensive lodging services, including: • 24 lu-. Front Desk Attendant(s) • Maid Service • Room Service • Concierge • Bell Service Thanks to these amenities and services, Manor Vail currently experiences the following rental program participation and occupancy: • 75% Rental Program Participation • 60% Overall Occupancy 2) Positive Impact of Redevelopment on Rental of Existing Units Redevelopment will likely result in Manor Vail's existing units experiencing higher occupancy and room rates by making this already strong lodging property more competitive through remodeled exteriors, upgraded architecture/landscaping, addition of elevators, creation of continuous indoor corridors, refurbishment of entry and lobby, new swimming pool facility, underground parking and much more. These improvements are in addition to the $S.SM that the Manor Vail Association has invested in improving the common areas to support rental performance and the $2.SM in interior renovations that individual unit owners have made since 1998. 1 Attachment: D 3) New units ]Expected Rental Performance and ><ncentive Program a) Of the ] 7 new units there are two sma112BR's and one sma113BR which are ideal for rental. b) Management believes they can successfully rent the larger units if they are made available. Current trends in resort lodging point to a growing number of large units being placed into rental programs. c) Tn response to Council's concerns regarding rentals we have created 20 bedrooms in the new condominium units that can be separately rented. d) As an incentive to owners to place these bedrooms in the rental program, owners will be provided with a $5,000 credit to pay for furnishings for the bedrooms for every year the owner enters the bedroom into the rental program, up to a maximum of 7 years ($35,000). This incentive program camlot legally be __:.;. , .,._..: ,~ ..__, ., represented by the developer,to,.prospectiye purchasers of the: new.unts,and will thus be introduced to new unit owners after closing by the Property Management Company at Manor Vail -who will be responsible for administrating the incentive program. 2 :it=°4~ MANOR VAIL LODGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS MANOR VAIL LODGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made effective as of the day of , 2004, by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado (the "Town), East West Partners, Inc., a ("East WE~st"), and Manor Vail Condominium Association, a Colorado Non-Profit Corporation ("Manor Vail"). RECITALS• A. East West and Manor Vail intend to redevelop certain real property in the Town of Vail, commonly known as the Manor Vail Lodge, which is located in Special Development District No. 38, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property"). B. The Town, through its appropriate boards and reviewing agencies, including its ,_ - __ ,.._Pl,~nning -:and ..Environmental Commission, has annro~,red .rPc!?v?lopment. plans (the .- .. ..,. , "Manor Vail Approvals") to allow for the redevelopment of the Property (the "Manor Vail Redevelopment"). The Town's Design Review Board is also in the process of reviewing final plans for the Manor Vail Redevelopment, and upon approval shall be come part of the above-referenced Manor Vail Approvals. C. Pursuant to the Manor Vail Approvals and to further mitigate the impact of the Manor Vail Redevelopment, East West and Manor Vail have agreed to provide certain public benefits and improvements (the "Public Benefits") as set out in the Manor Vail Approvals and as further provided in Town of Vail Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004, and as more specifically described and defined herein. NOW, THERFORE, in consideration of the above premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Responsibilities Of The Parties Regarding Public Benefits Required by East West And Manor Vail As Part of The Manor Vail Redevelopment. The parties hereby agree that East West and/or Manor Vail shall be responsible for providing the following Public Benefits suk~ject "`~"'~"" to the terms below: ~---~~~~ (a) Improved Pedestrian Access To Ford Park: East West shall be responsible for constructing a ten (10) foot wide pedestrian/bike path, which rerouts the existing path to Ford Park as it passes through the Property, as set forth in the Manor Vail Approvals: Manor Vail hereby agrees that it shall responsible far all legal requirements and costs associated with such rerouting, including but not limited to the grant of a new easement in the location of the rerouted path, which shall be conveyed to the Town prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the Manor Vail Redevelopment. (b) New Landscaped Garden: East West agrees that it will be responsible for creating a landscaped garden above the new parking structure, as depicted on the Manor Vail Approvals. c; , (c) Mill Creek Improvements: East West agrees that it shall be responsible for making improvements to Mill Creek adjacent to the Property as set out in the y- ~~ ~~~ jmmVPH.D[A Attachment: E ~ ~~ ~~ ~ '~` a#'~ Manor Vail Approvals. The purpose of these Mill Creek Improvements is to enhance the appearance of the creek and to provide stream bank stabilization to mitigate erosion. (d) Employee Housing: East West agrees .that it shall be responsible for constructing an employee housing unit within Manor Vail Lodge capable of housing at least four occupants. Upon completion of the employee housing unit, Manor Vail shall execute and record a deed restriction, in a form approved by the Town of Vail Community Development Department, to permanently restrict this unit as an employee housing unit. (e) Land Transfer With The Town: Manor Vail agrees that it shall quitclaim to the Town any right, title and interest, in and to that certain land which comprises 430 square feet at the Eastern portion of the Property in the location shown in the Manor Vail Approvals in exchange for a perpetual easement from the Town to Manor Vail of the land to be encroached upon by portions of the North side of the Building C, as reflected in the Manor Vail Approvals. Manor Vail shall be ' ' "`'responsitiie"for ali"costs assc~ciatzd with this land tran'~fer. "" ` (f) Raised Pedestrian Crosswalks: East West agrees to construct two raised pedestrian crosswalks on Vail Valley Drive. One crossing is to be constructed at the intersection of Vail Valley Drive and Hanson Ranch Road and the other at the intersection of Vail Valley Drive and Gore Creek Drive, as set out in the Manor Vail Approvals. (g) Traffic Impact Fees: East West acknowledges and agrees that the Manor Vail Lodge Redevelopment will generate seventeen (17) additional peak trips and agrees to pay the Town a Traffic Impact Fee of $5,000 per peak generated trip, for a total of $85,000. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the payment by East West to the Town of the entire amount of the Traffic Impact Fee ($85,000) shall be a condition to the issuance of a building- permit for the Manor Vail .Redevelopment. This fee shall be used to pay for public traffic improvements on the South Frontage Road, Vail Valley Drive, Chalet Road, and East Gore Creek Drive as deemed necessary to alleviate traffic impacts. (h) Streetscape Improvements To Gore Creek Drive and Chalet Road: East West agrees to contribute $100,000 to the design and construction of streetscape improvement along Gore Creek Drive and Chalet Road. The Town and East West agree that the $100,000 contribution shall be deposited in an escrow account with instructions to restrict use of these funds to the streetscape improvement project in the above-referenced locations. Escrow instructions will also dictate that any portion of the $100,000 remaining in the account the day after the 5-year anniversary of the initial contribution shall be refunded to East West Partners. The Parties acknowledge that the Town will be responsible for leading and coordinating all aspects of the streetscape improvement project and that East West's role in the streetscape project is strictly limited to the contribution outlined above. The Town acknowledges that the streetscape improvement plan must be reviewed by the neighboring ~ homeowners associations and that the Town will reasonably incorporate feedback from these associations and the applicant into the final plan. The entire amount of the Streetscape Improvements to Gore Creek Drive and Syr ~A" jmmVPH.DIA 2 ~ ~ ~ Chalet Road fee ($100,000) shall be paid by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Manor Vail Redevelopment. 2. Bonding For Public Improvements. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that a bond or letter of credit must be posted for 125% of the total estimated amount for each of the improvements listed above (as set forth in the attached Exhibit B), with the exception of the one-time Traffic Impact Fee and the contribution to the streetscape improvements to Gore Creek Drive and Chalet Road as set forth above, which will be fully funded prior to delivery of the building permit. 3. References To The Manor Vail Approvals. Any and all references to the Manor Vail Approvals, as set forth herein, shall mean references to those plans approved by the Town of Vail for construction of the Manor Vail, Lodge re-development project and as further provided in Town of Vail Ordinance No. 24, Series 2004, and may be modified only as approved by the Town through the building permit process. If a conflict arises between ariy construction plans previously submitted and those approved as part of the building permit for this project, the _, parties agree;th~t the, building permit plans shall control. .. , 4. Certificate Of Compliance. It is agreed that upon completion of any of the Public Benefits contemplated by this Agreement and upon .the expiration of the warranty period as defined herein, the Town shall, upon the request the party responsible for the particular Public Benefit, execute a certificate stating that all improvements have been constructed in compliance with this agreement. Said certificate shall not be unreasonably withheld if the requesting party has completed the Public Benefit in a good and workmanlike manner, and consistent with plans approved by the Town. 5. Warranty. East West and /or Manor Vail shall warrant any and all Public Benefits for which they are responsible for a period of two (2) years from date of completion and acceptance by the Town. Specifically, East West and Manor Vail shall warrant that any and all physical improvements or other Public Benefits required by the this Agreement which are conveyed, dedicated or otherwise done for the benefit of the public shall be free from any defects in materials and workmanship, and free from any security interest, monetary lien or other encumbrance. 6. Liability of Successors. The provisions hereof touch and concern and run with the ownership of the Property. 7. Notices; Business Days. / Agreement shall be in writing, ma legal counsel, and shall be dee intended recipient, by whatever deposited in the United States m~ or certified mail, with return rece deposited with an overnight cour delivery area encompassing the prepaid; or (iv) when received vi accessed by the applicable tele delivery and receipt is confirmed under clause (i). (ii) or (iii) above ny notice required or permitted under the terms of this ~ be given by the parties hereto or such parties' respective ned given and received (i) when hand delivered to the means; (ii) three (3) business days after the same is ils, with adequate postage prepaid, and sent by registered pt requested; (iii) one (1) business day after the same is er service of national or international reputation having a ddress of the intended recipient, with the delivery charges ~ facsimile on the intended recipient's facsimile facilities phone number set forth below (provided such facsimile >n the facsimile facilities of the noticing party). Any notice shall be delivered or mailed, as the case may be, to the appropriate address set forth below: jmmVPH.DIA j ~a~T"~ (gip, ~~;~ '~ e1~ f G 7,d ~,. _~ o ~~~~ If to Manor Vail: c/o Attention: Fax No.: () Phone: () with a copy to: c/o Attention: Fax No.: Q If to East West Partners: c/c .. ,.:. .... Attention: Fax No.: Q Phone: () with a copy to: c/o Attention: Fax No.: Q If to the Town of Vail: Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Attention: Town Manager Fax No.: (970) 479-2157 with a copy to: Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Attention: Town Attorney Fax No.: (970) 479-2157 Each party may change its addresses and/or fax numbers for notices pursuant to a written notice which is given in accordance with the terms hereof. As used herein, the term "business day" shall mean any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday for which ~IJ.S. mail service is not provided. Whenever any date or the expiration of any period specified _~ ~~ ~ ~ k~ ~~ ~~~ ' ~'" ~.; under this Agreement falls on a day other than a business day, then such date or period shall be deemed extended to the next succeeding business day thereafter. 8. Conditions To East West's Obligations. Manor Vail and the Town acknowledge that East West does not currently hold any property interest in Manor Vail~Lodge and East West's obligations under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon the acquisition by East West from Manor Vail of .the development rights necessary for East West to satisfy its obligations . hereunder. If for any reason East West does not acquire such development rights and so notifies in writing both the Town and Manor Vail, Manor Vail hereby agrees to accept and assume all obligations of East West hereunder effective upon such notice and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless and defend East West and its affiliates from and against any claim, demand, liability, cost or expense asserted East West or its affiliates arising out of this Agreement and to pay such indemnified party's reasonable costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in defending any such matter. 9. Severability. In the event any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceah!a under an;. preserf or f~~t!.IrP laws, the legality, validity and. Pnforceability of the , . .- .,.. remaining provisions in this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and in lieu of the affected provision there shall be deemed added to this Agreement a substitute provision that is legal, valid and enforceable and that is as similar as possible in content to the affected provisiori. It is generally intended by the parties that this Agreement and its separate provisions be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 10. Exhibits. All Exhibits to this Agreement which are referenced by the provisions hereof as being attached hereto are deemed incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the other contracts or agreements specifically referred to herein represent the entire agreement betweeri the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and all prior or extrinsic agreements, understandings or negotiations shall be deemed merged herein. 12. Rules of Construction. The headings which appear in this Agreement are for purposes of convenience and reference and are not in any sense to be construed as modifying the paragraphs in which they appear. Each party hereto acknowledges that it has had full and fair opportunity to review, make comment upon, and negotiate the terms and provisions of this Agreement, and if there arise any ambiguities in the provisions hereof or any other circumstances which necessitate judicial interpretation of such provisions, the parties mutually agree that the provisions shall not be construed against the drafting party, and waive any rule of law which would otherwise require interpretation or construction against the interests of the drafting party. References herein to the singular shall include the plural, and to the plural shall include the singular, and any reference to any one gender shall be deemed to include and be applicable to all genders. The titles of the paragraphs in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not intended in any way to define, limit or prescribe the scopE; or intent of this Agreement. 13. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which this Agreement has been executed and delivered by East West; and Manor Vail and so executed by the Town Manager. N W+f~}i~,j ~j~ jmmVPH.DIA ~~ ~~ €+~ a 14. Waivers and Amendments. No provision of this Agreement may be waived to any extent unless and except to the extent the waiver is specifically set forth in a written instrument executed by the party to be bound thereby. No modification or amendment to this Agreement shall have any force or effect unless embodied in an amendatory or other agreement executed by all parties hereto. 15. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado, and Eagle County, Colorado shall be the venue for any dispute arising under this Agreement. 16. Additional Assurances. The parties agree to reasonably cooperate to execute any additional documents and to take any additional action as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. __ 17. _ No Third Party Beneficiary. No third party is intended to or shall be a beneficiary of this . Agreement, nor shall any such third party have any rights to enforce this Agreement in any respect. 18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 19. Recording. This Agreement shall be recorded in the real property records for Eagle County, Colorado. 20. No Joint Venture or Partnership. No form of joint venture or partnership exists between the Town and the other parties hereto and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as making the Town and the other parties to this Agreement joint venturers or partners. 21. Attorneys' Fees. In the event any legal proceeding arises out of the subject matter of this Agreement and is prosecuted to final judgment, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other all of the prevailing party's costs and experises incurred in connection therewith, including reasonable attorneys' fees (and the presiding court will be bound to make this award). [Balance ofi page intentionally left blank] c '~` , . x; ,~ jtnmVPH.DIA 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the Developer have made this Agreement as of the day, month and year first above written. TOWN: TOWN OF VAIL, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado Bv: Name: Title: Town Manager Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk STATE OF COLORADO ~ ss: COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200_, by as Town Manager of the Town of Vail, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public [Signature blocks continue on following page] ., ~~~ r t~~~ -•~ jmmVPH.DIA v ~.,~ ~, EAST ~ilEST: EAST WEST PARTNERS, INC., a Colorado corporation ay: Name: Title: - STATE OF COLORADO ) ss: COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_, by as of East West Partners Inc., a Colorado corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public , [Signature blocks continue on following page] t a~ jmmVPH.DIA .~~ .., MANOR VAIL: EAST WEST PARTNERS, INC., a Colorado Non-Profit Corporation By: Name: Title: STATE OF COLORADO ) ss: COUNTY OF ) _... 4.., .._.~y •. y • t -, ~, I Chad before me this- y . Tic; fv+t> ~~t7"'•In3trUilli.n 'vvdS acnil0vv ed ~ da - - of , 200_, by as of Manor Vail , a Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public C~ ~ Kt 3 ~.~;~ ~~ ~~ka u~~, c.RJ jmmVPH.DiA 3 .'~.'r"T'-~'_. ^r'~~ n.CL_~ I (J ~~~ y ~r~'J"lil.- 6~ Q ~~~ ~'- '. r}\ ,~ _ }(Kr',' ~f f+~J''..,' •.: ,e,~,c~ , ~ ti n .. 4 ~ .~`, ~~ . ma`r' __ -_ 1 ~~y`, ~ - (~ a a~ `~~ ~ -_ == „J , j ~// . °)~ ~ _ ~~i~ ,eQ . p,~' ~H pit ~~ ~..,~ Q ,`~-~ A ~^;, r ~ ~f ) .`l~ 1~ _ Cl _. ~~~~T~ `a ';~41 '~ _If li ~ ~e .~~ i ~ ti. ~a~~®~ Ua~dl~ - ~~ ~=J~ .. ~~~~L 1«} l ~ -;. ` ,;~;' , (~•~~ U/~ ~ ~:,'~ s .r ~ ~ '~_~`i'i ~. ~1~ ~' c j } ,. ~ - _ ;` - - ^ III .yam ~ ~~ y ~~ ! ~~~ ~~ .r ~ ~~, _ _ r,~ _ _: 'd 4 -s ~ 1 (N ~ A+. Zr ~Jt r l~ :. )r ~ `. - .~ ~ , ~ ~ i ` +„ ~w r f r f~la~ 7 ~_ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ tt ~ ..~^t 1 Lti^ . t~~ '~ rY ~~~ ~ r - Yr 'Fr '~Ig ~ {r. 1 . ~~ P + i 4 , ~~ 1 i _ * ° ~ ,~~ X11 3s:'~ i .~ - (11 i - ~ ~~ ~ 1- 4 j ~ ;-~' :r. i:. ~ - . ~. v _ ~' L , .~'~ .U _" M'i ~) . r i ~- ~ ~ T ..~- ) '--.~, ~) m~ ~ ~ ~,,. n., ~ 1 E ~ ~ dJ i- ~ - 4 - i t~ ~ 1 ~~1 _`~ a P~~ r _ ~ ~ if -~-~-' ~ - I ' - _ s I -~ ~ _ r ~ 1 _ nr ~. ~ - r ~ I r= 1 a k a • ,~ 1 q: I ~i ` F 11 it v '~ y r N,4, r 1 I ~, i r ~ _ i t. =~r~~ ~t i , i ~~ ~~~ ,, ~ ~~ ~ ~. 1 9th l i .` 1 ~ t. ~ -. is a 'i ~ i'y~--)fir i ,L: <<. ~ .?~F~ ~'~..j ~ ~'~~(u~ ~ - a_ ,f~ ~ ~J ~ r ~i (C~ _ ^ '~` ~.. i~ ~~~~. III .,<~ ,r, "t' F ; 5j,, qRi. ~ ~` ~. c ~.. -c;:;; .1 ~,~. ~ ~ i"' .~'Q ~ f .~~ .,J ~~ ~'7fr _ ~li r ~ rt~`c ~.-~yl~`t ~~ i~~.. r~ ~ ~~~ ,h' ~. - "~f rC. ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ '~ ~. - ~" , ~ ti ~ i ~~M+ w r. ' t ~ .~ ~~ ~i,~~-^ ~z, (w r ~ i r ~ ,d. -4 I 'f ~ 9'-i~ S ~ - a i, ~n .G~. ,~ ~ 1 ~ ~1 ~ 'r-_ ~ ~. .~/ ~ c ,~ ~ ~ f J ~ ~~ l ~ ~ ~` ~ A'r/, J ~ t _ U 4f ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~r ~_~~ ~ ~~. ~, _ '~ ~'~,~ ,p ~, 4^ ~ ~~. ,_ _ ~ ~~,~ ~~ i ~.' ~~ ~ `` ~ A y r - 1 .: ~ ~ r~ ~ t` ~ r ~ ~` `~ t u'r '! 71 T ~.~ } fy' do-. \ { ~i ~ ~ ~F ~, l)~'~~ t Legend ~ ~' L ~~ - ~ I ~ _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ , r~ I ~~ ~ 5~.,, ~l~ ~ ), ,~ 94 ,~ r~ r ~f~~/ 1%~ L ~ Buil~tlmq F~ootpnnts ~ ~ ~ . _~ ~, _ _ _ r- ...... ~ti ... ~ '~~ ,~.. }} S ~ a l o ~-. ~~Y p, ~~ ~{ Parcel Boundaries C ~` ~ ii ~ )~ +) 11 1 ~i c ~. ~ Y I } ~ ~~ ~t ~ I~ C. ~ .y~~ r. ti { p ~a F ~ ~ ,,L's"' , k / Y CN 400ft Buffer ~ ;_~ ~ ~ ^,~ ~~~ ~~. , ~ ~ k ~`~ ,'~ ,) ~-- ~,~ ~~~ ,L ~~,' „ % ,r MANOR yAIL c®ND®MINIUMS `I A n 9 ~~L~~~v ~ a cnia~ o.~ Px®z®L®cA~r®R MAp ~~ Aftachmen~: C i [.._:....aC.. .. _... _.... . EXIST'IIVC7 :::, -;, _,~ . _ ~ , ,,~: F2~ V A L.: v. ? t ~ rn 1 k.N i i' ~~ i~ j , a' 1 ,. _ ~ 4 IE - ~ ~ 4 ~ ;. r ri , ,. -y- ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~' 1 ~' ~,~~~ ... . ' ~ „'"C _ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ t y ,.'~;: ~ ~ . i ~ d r ., 1 ~N, _ _. ~ ~. ~L~ J .. L0~ •~'% _.. ~ may` .~, ~~. ~._ ~ ~ ~~ '.1F ,.,, . _~- -'- is I'I~®P®SEI~ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE FRONTAGE ROAD LOOKING OVER FORD PARKS SOFTBALL FEILD TO GOLD PEAK. car Al~TOlZ VAIL ~ ®1yD®1VII~TIUI~I ~i i~~'' ~XIS~'INC~ PIS®P®SEI~ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE EDGE OF VAIL VALLEY DRIVE NEXT TO GOLD PEAK PARKING LOT AT GROUND LEVEL. ~2 MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS ~.~IIY,y COLORADO _ ~~ .. . , ~ . EXIS'T'ING PIZ®P®SEI~ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE DECK OF A THIRD FLOOR UNIT (G-3) IN THE ALL SEASON. i Q13 MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS ~AI~d.9 COLORADO .... _ _.. f ~~~ F ~~ EXISTINCI --. r,,T--~, - -~,~ ~-- J. , ~,ti , ~,. ~~ d ~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~P J r ` V .t'~s. + F I ~+1 s~~ /' ~~ ;' ~ ~ ; ~'~ ~ aft ~ ' ~ j - 3 x ~ i tr.. ~ ~ '~! ., i _ i F _ ~ ( r' iT ~~' I'IZ®ID®SEI~ THiS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE SIDEWALK OF VAIL VALLEY DRIVE IN FRONT OF NORTH WOODS (PINGS DEL NORTE). ~4 Al~T®IZ SAIL C ®l~TD®MII~TIUI~I 7 g ;.,~. V ~11~~ ~®1LJ®ailS~® ,.w~d a }F~.s. 'r, EXIST'INCJ r ,P ~ -1y. y k""~•.....:. ~ ;T ~~~ / r 1 ~ s ~ /~ j , i ~ d ~ ..~,;~y .w ~' Y„ ~ ~,,,, . -N., . ~ t. ~ .. ~.. a. r .< ~ ~~ ... .r.. q~.. ~ '~ PY~®P®SED THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE SIDEWALK VAIL VALLEY DRIVE IN FRONT OF THE RAMSHORN PARKING LOT ENTRY. US AN®12 V~IIJ CND®MINIjJIi~I -- x f~. ~j, EXIS'TIIVCT PIS®P®S~I~ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE EASTERN EXIT OF THE GOLD PEAK LODGE SURFACE PARKING LOT AND SKIER DROP OFF. ~~ MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS ~~IIF.y ~.OLORAD~ ~;~.- -~7 ~° 4j~'; ilC ~'1 r ~~ EXIS'TINCI ~`~ - ""_"f_^t^-_-Mr^rT^:c^°--~'-' - ~no~ +.-. - r-.++~ ,i,-e.-...r..r. - n'c'S,n4 T~s .t Y, .1 ~ 1 ~' - Y r~ , ' PIS®P®SEI~ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM A TOP FLOOR UNIT AT THE WREN LOOKING AT THE SKI MOUNTAIN (GOLD PEAK). MANOR VAIL ND®1VIINIU~VI ~mn, ~ 4 ~ -~ a .~~ .. "`~' ~~ -- EXISTIIVC~ Pl\®~®U~L ~ ~~~,~~~~:u~ ,n .lye .,. THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE HILLSIDE AT FORD AMPHITHEATER LOOKING TOWARD THE SKI MOUNTAIN. ~8 MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS VAIIY.9 COLORADO a~~'" ~ R ~ ~ ,~:' P ~. ~'1 a~~' ~ J y~J+¢', l , r ~~ ~ { n r ~ i~` . i .;r t ~~ c ddb , i ~ r> ~ ~ f' ~ ~~~~. 4 { , , ~ , =I ; r a+ . ~ ~ ` ~ ~ w ~~~ `~ x.,~, ~ ti r~: i- ,~ ~~~ ~~. ' .,. i ~; _" I i s ~~'. I era ~ z R' ~' ~ ~~~~~'`.?. ~~ ~ ~''~ ¢ ... . EXISTING PIS®P®SEI~ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING SURFACE PARKING LOT AT MANOR VAIL LOOKING AT THE CONNECTION BETWEEN BUILDINGS D&E. 09 MANOR vAIL CONDOMINIUMS VAE%.y COLORADO h ~. u~~~ ~ ~ ,~ E __ ~,, h" .. -- _._ ~ .++. :. a.. r ..., y. S~1 ~ . . u ` . ~}. ~ t t .~. ~, Y. J.~ ~ ~_N?~y ~~ : tl~ I. i ~ ~ . } r. M,Nh~.J.... I~ .. N a ' k ~~„„~~~ Vii. Y ' .+~~ ~°y~z.i 4Lr ~ 'p~.~y ~. c R~fl wI'~ 7.i4J4. EXISTING 4 I ,. ~- ~- ,~ += ,~ ~~®r ®1JEI~ ~>~ ~~~~ '~471F..nd.: ice.. ~' :'"-~-~_ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN IN FRONT OF BUILDING D LOOKING AT BUILDING F AT GROUND LEVEL. PO MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS VAgY.9 COLORADO ..~.~ r -~.-_.. ;~ ~ ;.- , ~r, r~~ EXISTING PIZ®P®SEI~ THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE DECK ON THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE GOLD PEAK LODGE LOOKING BACK AT THE GORE RANGE. ~ R~ MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIiTMS ~~g~,, CoLOUnno _; ~ : ~u~~ ~_,, ~~a i ~~ i a ~ ~ _' wm /,(~~~~ Ik •1~ ,~ :, r~" J ~; t w ~ ~:kt t~4f ~ ~ ~ „jam ~ `,~:' r „~, IJ4.~ ~ i.~r ~ `~: c y ~I f `- #EF >+'41~ a~'!'•' ~~ 3.. '~jI1 ~ ._-~..~..wrr~ea,.+rw~rp ~ J P~~ i s} ' .Y~ 1'Z -i III ~~ ''1w1~ ~. - ~ 1 ~ 'p 5 r ,~ ~" ~~ h . ~.,,,~... ~~ r.. _ ' ~L SH~ 1 Yl V V "-. ~~.'. ~ ~~ , ~ ,(ti ~~C~' q'~~ ~f~~ ! - ~~ i ~ V~ i ~ - 1 ~I II ~~ il. 6 « F.. a~ .. '4 }t 4~~ a'r' ~~~, . ,~ "n` k ~. ~. ~4 1 ~ .. .. 1 1 , • t,_ ' } '^ _ t t •'1 .Y.. ti ~. ~ r, i r _ ,.~ ~~- ;~ A!f~ ~ .",. ~ ~ a~ ''~ ~ ~~'', ~ ~ , ~ .~?` T, i w ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ jr ~ )~ , t ~ _ k ~~ Y',r,Y n'~C.~^ P~ i 4 tJ~ 1v ~M A 1 ~> . 1 .- r .: ~ ~ ~~ ~Y'~ ~~ '~ ~~~F++ r~ ~t " k. i ~+h~'. ~" ~'M4'~As+IMM~tirkw~sL~N-5;1 } 'F ~ a ~1~ ~- r .. ~~ }} - 7~.~~~' ~, t 7r Ir ~ > t~ T t ~ l: .ti~ - _ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ F r ~ ~, tr ~ 1 i r, ~'~ :~- w is t'~ - -'~ :~ ~ ~~._ i w , },~ J L '~ ~+fMi'•.,+-w.-Y +yt~'~~ ~~+~~'y1 to , r c -~ - - ~"`~'~ +f , rM~ ~'7'.•, ~' ~ ~ "«.'r ~"~";~;~d S~ y ~~ Y ~ T ..~7~ i :~.: ~'.w:,,ra,o.~t~"r ~j, }~ ~~ ~ j~ +''t~ ~ ~ '~, r~-~} k`~'"r'~~L~ `."- a x~ f; y(.~nl~ ,w _ ~_. ~+, }T `!'+L -~ rr '..r, 3'z ~~rT c ~'..nc~ '~ 1 q~ lsalrs'~um._. h.~~ 'f _.. `..__' ._.~ ~ # A! rJ ~la"'~. 'ti- ~"•fr•y~ `-, dw•~,~'•~- Y ..- ff .~F,~, ~Y\®1 ®IJ~Aj' THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE EDGE OF EXISTING MAIN ENTRY TURNAROiJND. 12 SAN®R AIL ®ND®1VIINIiTl~S ~~L' C®L® ~ ;®- ;f . h ~: .'. W.". 4 ~~ t k, - y r Y~~M itiI ~'dn ~ a~~ h - 7! l~ 1 5 ''!1 v . rl~~ ._~ .. ...a 1w.,.. .._ .. EXIST'IIVCT u ~ ~ , ~. y ;^ } ~~,< s~ 1 ~'4 t~~ 1 1\®1 ®IJLL THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE BUS STOP AT GOLD PEAK AT GROUND LEVEL. ~1~ MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS V.~IIL9 COLORADO .:/.. ~~F ~~~, 4 - 6 ~ ~~ ' - ~ ~ - x: .t r` u~.`• p.:' fi ,x t `~ ~ ~ 4 ` ~ ;~-_ -- _ s EXISTING ~--,- e i~ .~~ r.n -` ,i t 1~ ~,.•y ~ ~ 1~.~ ~ _ i ~ y } ~,'.:t ' r.~ ~ ~ ~~ Y ~ ~ ~ L ~~~'' •~..in.. ~~-: y~Jf~ a ..i ~^tri ~1~ ` ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ i ~ ~ i r y~; `~ t YI ' l3 .. 't.r 'SR k . ~~E ll l VVV ,. I ` r ~l .,a:. ~~ i~~ ..n ,a.~ ! G~ It J »'yid ~ .'" `"r~ ' LLB ~ ~ _.r"'~ ~~~-r -- ~ -rc.r-^' -' • , ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ c r s~,c'- ~; ~, ~: r ~, ~ ~~ ' ~tk ~s *,L ~ - "~ ~ ~`,,, y~a~~~ ~ ~5 ` "1 ~ ~ - `~,~' r`~r ~' ,_ ~ .-- ~" it .+`~ y r'_, f '- ° i3 $r~ ~ ~ -s . \' I ~` ~ _ _ _ ~ > ~ 3 ~~ h Ira ~ ~ ' ..t ~ t ki- :~ 1 ~ r ~ y~ r JLt®~®SED THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE CORNER OF CHALET RfJAD AND VAIL VALLEY DRIVE AT GROUND LEVEL. 14 MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS Vr~II~.9 COLORADO EXISTING PIS®P®SEI) THIS VIEW WAS TAKEN FROM THE TOP OF THE SOUTHWEST STAIRS OF THE EXISTING SURFACE PARKING LOT AT MANOR VAIL. ~ ~ MA1vOR VAIL CONDOMINIUMS ~~IIY.9 COLORADO ~_. ,1 ~,. ~~~ ~~-~ Wet Meadow Mix -for wet areas that are not true wetlands Meadow Foxtail 25% Reed Canary 25% Fowl Bluegrass 25% Tufted Hairgross 25% Approx. 100 lbs. per acre r Add native wetland plantings along top of banks. Refer to Landscape Plan. ~ .A U htl VLJ ? . ~ o y, TYPICAL MILL CREEK SECTION Add boulders (24" dia min) in areas where slope cut back to 2:1. Where bank is eroded, cut to reduce slope to 2 horiz: 1 vert Add topsoil, meadow mix seed, geotextile fabric to encourage natural revegetation and erosion control _ _ a>a ~ c~R£ CR _ _._ .~ _ _ e fK as ~- ''r ~~-_ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .,.,, ~ '"~ ®' r ~ al ~ ~,,,,, `'~~~ ~~. ~ '.eT 1 i' .~. ¢Ty~~' ~.A ~ Y Q7 Y f r o ~' " 7 C ~~ ~¢ ii „~ b+ Q w o: a F Z w 0 a J ~ t O 11 ~~ ~~ . x a s~ ~s uu 0 ~~ 0 °s k Ss d d~' 4~ S~ • e ~~ ~C i~~ . ,,,r~, - f=~ `. „o~~m~`s~ a :;c: '~ fi ~=o ~go ~ +q 4b ~ ~ 005""" .f. ~ Z o~ooo ,~ ~ ~~ ro cno°in . H c~ " £NiSINdG PGt~ e ~ ~ s ~ a ~~+p' ~ ~ Et9~EE~c ,~ _~¢` J a ~as~er-_ Ff'7t.? ...f W .. ~ a ~ W ~ o J ,.~, ~ o 0 W ~ Z v ,~um~ ~~ ~ A > Z I Os~ FlVR AC earnw ~ J Z ~ W ~ '``.. ~ ea, ~` i ~ Q J / W a 5 W W W J `~' V ° > a - - ~ ~ a > I a J ~ o ~f _ m ~ O ~r~ r ~r _ .. -. 62'9, ?,~P:~ o _ _____ _ ~ ,v mean PLAN VIEW 1" = 50' ... ~ N/A 41"~ e-a-oa oa oosl ~~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~_ _ I i ~ T~~~ ~~; ~ C l l f IP~ l ' 4 ~i.;r .1~ t~ ~~ ~'l~ f 3 c I ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 1 / ~ ~; ( ~ I ~ , ~ ~ r ~Y V 1 `Jl I ~ . L ~ ~ .../ j S }r ~ ' } y ~ ~ , { s ` 4 ~ ~. I - ----- I ~~ i i j 5 y Y. y'.,\ f j}y ~l l tiyr Nr 'S:. d- i~ l r 1 d L' y "1 Vfy ~ ~.'~ I A~ Y ~ F f~ ' ` ~1~ _ 1 , ~ ! y, i A 1 ' ~,. ,.( h; a _. { " ~.~ t.. r- ri -~ o ~C L~I ^I /P • L \ . , \ , ~ I ~ ' ~ ~_ L~ ~ , S- A 1 ~'S I~ ' ~ . ~ ~~: ~ `~ ( ` (~ ~l ,~~ a a` ~ t, 1 s,~ f a ~ ~ , ~ k V f ,v') ~ > l {Y ~; Ly 4 .r, 'J~~i ~ h L k. ri ~ ~ .' ~ .: 'hff 3r ~ e ~' + .. , t e , s: rh: - S ~ r.~' ~ ~ ,y. ~ r r ~ f ~ ' ~ ~,~ ~ ~ 2. ~ _3 ,. ~' !~. +. ~y ~ r itJ~ ~ ~ d lv Jir.~ -R N ~ t 4 $~ Y! l ~~ i~ '~' `~ ~ y ~ "~ q,;, ~~;:vi , tr ; 4~.rI ~ .., ~ a eRki""~ -~w~., R .~.. •7I ~r Y ~ ~t~ ~ ~~ +{ ~ }F rpy . k .i, +i ;~. {~ '+'~y~12 S l~'~J~y.Ri = rd''~' si r 1~4k~^~,. r y ~ . t~-'-'t ~ 3~ ~'~4 . -~~ ~ w ~ ~ ., ,:~ ;: ~ _ i ~; ~~~ ~, I ~ ~ '4'kd v.dr ,' t. NF~ r„a h f~~ y~K~ , r q$5:~ 'rs ~? a $ 4: ~ fl fl i i L ~1 ~® ~l W ~ pal '. ZUO j WM.~ M li <$$##y i i uy~j` i =m; ~ W i~ja~i YI'al -_ N s~:~ i ^, 15 ~ ^ ~ ~~Y f~~ ~~ J '6 ~ h ~ ~ DI _._ r ~~ ~ ~.. ~~~ ~ l ~ ~~ ~ ~;, ~~ ~~ ~~~t ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ i ~ 'Y~?~F' - 'v+I fly}, / M xJ~'l fKII ~f 33 ~~ y ~1` 4t fK 7-~ i~ ~ ,,, x ,,~. y; ' ~~, ' . ,~ ,~: ~~r'l ~~.; ~~ ;~~ R ~; Y Xa 'ti'By~ +hF~ ~ K 4 f i'}- b ,,ti7 r . ~ ` „~;. s a:: . ~ rk _ i ~ i~\ ~~ A / x1'M` ~ l. r Y,., ~~ „.. ¢~ ~.~ y~y d?sf'r 5'. k.. ~ l ,, ~ / 4, n 9 I t h \ ~l ~ti ~ ; ~ 4 4 y y~ .~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ' ,i. / ~ ~° TV m~ ,~ lam ~s~ a. ~~.~ ~~ .i fi/ ~& ( > J y *•. ~~4 ~ ~ ~ t. : ' ~ ~ \, a f.. ~ q'~ ~~r.' . ~ ; ~ yYA,j ~ t . y Yi -: ~~ ~ s f r b xn,, - t _ ~' ~ ~ Y T~d; . _ y~ r rt 1 F , . o-, ! . ~ ~~ SM `~ , ~ ~`I +/ FFT ~~ F,(~~ ~ f ~~ i3~llr , ~1 ~ +G l,~J F 4 ~4` , ~ .. J ~ ~ ~.. ~~I ~ '~ ~ a: Ad.: .... - .. ; l'~,: .~,i645~2e, r ~ .w ..~ - .. tj .~ ~ , ~:.~ ~ ~ - a ~~~~" *ry _ _ ~ :~ ~ ^~ t~ ~ ~' t? r ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ '~ ~~ Y~ /~ i '1 ~,,}, ~~ , ~1. ~ a ~ -~ \\ \~ 1 ~: i ~ t,v 1 L ~r ~ - c. ~~.." ~ Y ~ 44~~~~ ~" r ~_ ,~ I ' ~, ,~. d,Y; w ~a ~~ f' ~ 5 i.' ~~ :'%.a.ep.~ h,~ "hg ~ A.-. ~ ~ '~ ' ~ ..,........ ., Sf t{F ( ~ ~ yk ~ ld~i41~ ~ p 4 ~ J 'd -~ ~^- L ~_ M~' ~ i b ~~ . - r ~~ '} ~ ~h . M~ ' ' - -a t ~ " ~ } t / yr ~y, , / f .~5~ ~a~.f j~~.~~: 1~''Sl~~; ~~~` ," 1t. Ali. ,~r~::. f' ~ p ~ T,~ ~. Y` ~ I ~f t ~~ r. // a v u b ~~~~ ~41~ ° '~+ Rl~ ~.r ° c .:i ~~l~ 3~: .t a,r ~j; ~w- .`'yam';. "~ r ~~ ?** e.u~ -'~~'~~' r i., ~ ~~ 1 P 5i S -t '.~ , a ~ . ~" ~ ~ i ; ~, ~,~y, r`~. a ~a a 8 ~ s D SCI 7.1 :• W q'~ of _ ®~~. a ,;@ = a u o- n ~+ i '~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ - ~ i,, f' ~ i ~~ I i Jr~ i i~ ~ ~~ s. ~~ 1~i~. ~,, _ ~ ~ ~i'_ :,. :~~ ~,~ -r. ~~ ~' t . ~ ~ , Ji r. _ ~, I .U~+,~.,p I V _ f ~ . , ~ ,~ a . . ~~ y~r t p? ~ ~ ~'- ;fix,' - i.an~ :~ .~ ~F: ', a r i _ - ~~ ,~~ t ~ ~ ., A z> ,;; ; ~~~~ ~j ~ ~" r '~ ~ ~ ri ~ ~ ~:~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,. ,~. i I ~ •. -,` ;~' - ~ , ~` ~ "~a !~ ~~ ~Q« r r ~` r , rt~ 1 9 ?! ii ~ / ~ ~ t a~; ^l t ~r z ~ ~Y ~ H ' •Y( i . y ~~ S~ f~ ~ r ~ ~ ~t ~ t ' ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ ~~ ,~ ,. r a~ ~~'~3 ,:{ .~~ .. yL ~ ,~ ~ is ~ { ~~~..'~~`f 5 2Ya:-i,, ,~ ,~ yr x ,. '. ~t ~- Sc ~ f'.` L,f~ ,cpY~l ~~ S "f"'~ ~ rYilt~ 1 t ) -~ rq _5~ y J to r ~ i ~~ty"'~ .t ,'ki"~~i J t ;I ~' ~ r a t rF~y,~~ii'~+ 'I t ;. •1G ".'~ MCr 4 S ~ ~` ~ S.: , ,/ ~k- } t ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~? 7 ry~'a• [1 zy~ ~,'~ (~A ~~~~E'~d r ~~ 5 ~~ ~ J ~nv ~ \~; It ~- - _ ~~ ~, { w C,~. i+~tt[7 ~f ` >x ~-;i ~ d'kk 2 r - '• L t :pFa~D v [' l &:~ s } ~:~ .~~k j i P. xJ c - - ~ ~,j ,~ I ~~~ pd 8 s 9 a d O 0 Z°~. x ; W [Y ~ ~~i S 9~a. 9 W ~~~ 9'~i = 9, u a h 2' 3 ,~~~~ ~,'~`~~ 115 b ~'i;All ~!~l ~ ~li~' ,, i~ X11 ~~ li i :~ ~~,. ,;.. a .. ~ ~fI'~,,f -~ ~~ ~~ ~ f x~ y, Y ~ ;~~ a i. ~- . { ) 4 ~ ? / ~ T' Y ~1 ^L ~ 1 '~ I~ , } ^~U~ ~ ~ ;n ~~YY.. TK " 'i ~~ ~ ~ ~` ~t'G ° f~fr f ~ ~"f ~ 3 , ~S r $~ ~ ~, ~~;p z ~,~ ~ v .7r .u cra :,'~ ~ ~7 ~ yx ~~'..I .~ i~ Y N % "~', J t~;; ` ~.~~ 7 ~ t.. ~'~,~" ; ~ c w5 , ~ f .. \\ ;. ~~' ~,i,., ~ ~~ Y , fi -, . , t 1 Yki : yn;, ~ }y ~{ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ,1 ~ '~ L ~ , j{~ ~~a ~ ~'., ~~~ - x~Y Nb .may '(}Y *r k R ~ A . ~ ~ ~ A 1y~, { ~ ^"~ ~ ~ t~ ~~ a= N ° 7 ~ ~ 4 ~ ~aS~ ~s ~ ~ ~ ~~ NK . 1 w} f ~}w,~ 4L s/ ~' ~ ~ t V fi t ~~~ . y :,M w ~, ~ ~.Y ~. 1 .tee. :.,1 / {,ttt,. t ~ `~~ Lek. .yY'. y ~ ~' ~~ ~C1 ,i ,d~. ~ ' ~', ,: _. ~, ~. -,° ~_ ~ ~`s 'tit _ ~ ~ a. ~~ R~ t t ~< } s} t j( '~ .w, }~Z 9 »':L` ~ } r iY ..7' tip.. ~~ ~a ~,' +,w F ~~ r F Y:ti t ~~'.:.~ ~, ~~ ~ ~~~; j 1 /~ 1,. ~ f ~ a y, ~ ~V y/~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ r'' _. ~~, 4' ~` - ~ x~r~ ~ ~ ~~.~ ~- } ~,~,. ';. ;~' ~ ~~ .. ~ e t Y 4y, int. ~;~~ .~¢jl,: ` 1. ~ ~ ~~ ~r .r ~~ ~~ ~" '. ~'K `, .fir s .a ~~'.: i r ., ~ ~1,, ~r{j ~ ~' y.Ec'~s~ s~ ~iu 4 . „ ~ u ig. ~~~ , ~,.. aca -~ ~:` ~, ~ ~ 4~dr < ~:~ ~ X41. ~ ~ ~ ' `, n, a A ;, ~ ,=. ~;y- ~~~ 7 ~ '~''Y.M+G ? ~i«~~F ~~ t/Idti. ~ ~ 'i~a L~J.fi^ tl yr'J °Y~14+ I~ ~ r ~,~+" rc *'~h~ ~ s. r K ~ ~ tr A ~~ 7 7 t 1'^ 0. ` Y y t 1. SYW i~ '~~ ~r '~' Y ? ~ : ~,~: t ~ ~~~, f+`~ r ~~~/.fi {~. J~ -~. ~~ F . ~ ~ { t~ ` t: k• rx . ,a« ' ~" T V F ~ ~ 'F5 lfq'~1 .i: '.~'. ',~::'~ 4r 0 $~~ ~ s 8 fl A ~ Pr~'1 0 ~~ W m~=~ ~ ~i t~{ U ~j ~~ii W 0~~ s V u r t_ v a ~.~ ~._. r" R~I[~T~fl2 ~IFrg~. ~ONIl3~I~I~I~TggJl~~ ~`~~J~~~ T~ ~~ HOUSE I~~T~~N / ~ENOVA~~~~T 595 EAST VAIL VALLEY DRIVE VAIL, C® .~ a~„ ~ ~ _ _,~ , • __~ -- .. r ~ _ _ ~ -~ ~l ~ - ~ ~ a= T ~ ~ -~ _ _ - ~A i 4 Y _ ., _ y.~ ~ Air ~~.n"~=P"+^+r";. ,rVr(.}~K'.. Y 'x'r ~ t ~. lll~ae "+17H tl~• ll ,,,( , • j ~ ~i. f7 7 ~ f Y'r~~r'.Y~^ST 1V {TC ~.~~' _„ n ~ [ l ~7f 1n, f •~fi"~R`I :'' ,. '. T ~iT'7{'.C , n. ... '~1,Yp.~'~.L.. ~~~' I V M1t,..ri ~'.•,~ ~Jn =.. ~ ~ ~~L .,. ~ h~ f ~~r U_ ,. E y~. ~u -r - ~ a ~~.rp~.; _ i H r~,t :~ r ~ #`L~~r w - r'•-~'i.T..m +.- .,..~. - ,~~'. 4 ~' h~', }..o, ~t-' rat. F ` ';rt: 1i1~7'~' ~~ ~1.^ ~,,~ ~.,,-t1 ,.~ ~ a4` M~' + _ Ali '~'~~ ~.. 5_ _. _ . ~- rr. t4` ., ... , .'a, fit +JS,-~LF'4:`'' ,a, 3~.-~r~tr r~Lr.F_~, _ `~- il~r_z~~'.:~.~~~~ v.... ~,' t `. ._._.. I9 ®CTBE 2004 ISSUE 2~ T®WN C®tJNCIL SUBMITTAL 0 SANTA BARBARA ~ Z E H R E N V A I L (805)963-6890 FAX (805)963-8102 AND ASSOCIATES INC. (97o)9a9-ozS~FAx(s~o)sas-,oao sanlaharbara @ zehre n.com ~ v a i I Q z e h r e n c o m ARCHITECTURE •PLANNING•INTER[ORS Attachment: B y~ :`y:. ' 5 INDEX OF DRAWINGS CVR COVER A1.20 FLOOR PLAN-LOWER LEVEL PARKING GARAGE A0.01 DRAWING INDEX AL2l FLOOR PLAN-UPPER LEVEL PARKING GARAGE & BUILDINGS D, E,& F (ELEVATION 8173) AL22 FLOOR PLAN- BUILDINGS D, E, & F (ELEVATION 8183) CNIL Ai.23 FLOOR PLAN- BUILDINGS A & B (ELEVATION 8189) C l EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN A1.24 FLOOR PLAN- BUILDINGS D, E, & F (ELEVATION 8193) C2 TOPOGRAPHICMAP- BUILDINGS A, B, & C (EXISTING SITE PLAN) AL2i FLOOR PLAN- BUILDINGS A, B, & C (ELEVATION 8200) C3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP- BUILDINGS D, E, & F (EXISTING SITE PLAN) A1.26 FLOOR PLAN- BUILDINGS D, E, & F (ELEVATION 8202) C4 DRAINAGE & GRADING PLAN (PROPOSED SITE PLAN) A1.27 FLOOR PLAN- BUII,DINGS A, B, & C (ELEVATION 8210) AL28 FLOOR PLAN- BUII,DINGS D, E, & F (ELEVATION 8217) LANDSCAPE AL29 FLOOR PLAN- BUILDINGS A, B, & C (ELEVATION 8220) Ll MANOR VA[L LANDSCAPE PLAN A130 FLOOR PLAN- BUILDINGS A, B, & C (ELEVATION 8235) L2 MILL CREEK RdPROVEMENT PLAN AL40 ROOF PLAN- BUILDINGS A, B, & C ARCHI?'ECTU4AL Ad.41 ROOF PLAN- BUH,DRVGS A, B, & C A0.10 BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS- ABSOLUTE HEIGHTS/INTERPOLATED CONTOURS A0.11 BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS- BUILDING HEIGHTSI INTERPOLATED CONTOURS A2.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- BUILDINGS A & B AO.l2 BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS- PROPOSED HEIGHT/ PROPOSED CONTOURS A2.02 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- BULDING C A0.13 BUILDING HEIGHT- PROPOSED ROOF HEIGHT A2.03 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS-BUILDINGS D, E, & F A2.04 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- BUILDINGS D, E, & F A0.20 SITE PLAN A3.01 BUILDING SECTION AD1.02 EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 8173 AD1.03 EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 8183 ! 8189 AD1.04 EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 8193 ! 8200 AD1.05 EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 8202 ! 8210 ADI.06 EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 8220 AD1.10 EXISTING BUILDING ROOF PLAN A1.Ol FLOOR PLAN- LOWER LEVEL PARKING GARAGE A1.02 FLOOR PLAN-UPPER LEVEL PARKING GARAGE /ELEVATION 8173 A1.03 FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 8183 / 8189 A1.04 FLOOR PLAN-ELEVATION 6193 / 8200 A1.05 FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 6202 ! 8210 A1.06 FLOOR PLAN-ELEVATION 8217 / 8220 A1.07 FLOOR PLAN- ELEVATION 8235 AI.10 ROOF PLAN a `~- Mi GOm 4d A AID., IIUS ~RA~IVG ~N~EX ~~ ~ Na U Vail, Colorado E•d~W°,P°M~~ W E H R E,N ~ ~,a~ ° A~aO~ / {~ x 4 U $ ~~~,~ ~' ~' i ~ n ~ .y ~ ;~,'S~ ~ / 1r ~ ~', s..,~ f _ / ~ / I i ~ ss 4+ ~ ~ ~1 m~rvarn / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a _ cknawc scn~.e / ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ ~ ~ ~~"~,' ~ ~ ~ d~ i / / ~ I m ~ i ~~,a~7n .hP.lYAe=l 44 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ o~. ~/ ~ ~ ~P ~ ~ ~ fa ~j I .~ ~~ I ~ ~I o ~ ..~~~ o-°m ~ ~~ , e ' ~~ ~o. ~ ~a+ ~~ c ' ~. / '~~ ~ 5 ~ ~ 1 f `'~ /~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ oa ~< a ' i ~ ~ ~( ~;` h ' ' ' ~/ ~ / /I /^8~ i - ~ ~' ~ az ,, i a ~ ~ o ,' GR ~ ~ • ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I ego ~ \~ t / ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ a,~aGl Sum ~ W'~,' 1~ ~\ ' '~ R ~# ~~ ~~~.; ,,~ ~~.~ ~ -ems ~~ ~~ ~ e i ~; ~ ~ ~ / ,8' ~; l ~~ I- ~ i e ro 'gyp 1 s ;" I s'',~,,°a,, } ,~ ~~' ~ o t ~ ~~ t~~°~ .:.. _ / g. ~ , r~r, ,~ ~ ~ ~_~. ~ ~ ,~; ~ - ~ ---- ~, •, ~~ ~' I p ay7/~~ , ~ ~ -~~ EEE,,,~~~ I ~~ Ia~ 1 %~ ~~,;' ~s~~ ~ ° ~ r ~ a ~ ~ ~ , ~~~a ~ ~ I r o 9~ ~ I ~ ~ J ~ I ~ _ ~;, ti' d j- ~ , j r _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i o ~ ~ ~__ A r , I ~Y ~1~' u~ ~ ~ z fU .:; ~ t ~ I o", I ' ~I ~ Y, ti~ak ~~ v ~ is \ ~~ 8„~:e ~ ~_ I J a 1 k T 66qqrr~~ c ~ ~ v r I b: ~ : ~ ~ . ~•~ ~, i \.1_ r" d ~ 7 ~ m a •\\ /~ I ~~o >~,~ :~~; ~ma~u~~xeun x~r e ~,.~~ a4~~~~ ~~`~~ a _ _ i, ., a \~, 8tl 3f°ff i~E;f~[ ~~!fff~~]]4 I~~~i~f i ff ~~~fS~F~ i f€ +~~~ elt.! f ~8il~t h~~tap ~ ~l ~~°~ 2 j ro 6 W ~d °a >~~ s ~~; ~s°o 0 ~z~ ~'"a~ 8a> ~ m~ pj ~ o ~~i saa a ~ ~ ~~ ~, ~/ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~~ i ~, ~ ~- ~ ~,. ~~ ,/ 1~~~ I~ ~~~~~ ~ f ~~ ~ ra~~ ~/ q~ Y, ' ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ l f~§ ~ ~; aane~uc scams ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ F~ f ~ j ~ ~,-,~-r~i- ~i ~ ~ ~° v /~ ~ ~ ~ d 3 -- ~/ i ~ ~ ~ ti~ I :~r s ~ /,+ ~ '~ ~ / f ~ ~ / °+~ ~ f \~ ~ ~ `~ ~ .£~~z m _ ~ ~ ~ . p~ o . / ~ ~ ~ :R r i °~ ~+ / ~ v / ~f/ \ ~r ~ V / ~' ~ _Cr, f7 ~ r !s / ~ / ~ ,~ I ~ " ~ 'V -~ / ~ ,I ~ /~1`G I I f,-~. i ~ / ,. _~ ~ -~ GONE ~ i `r ~ ~ ~ 9~ ~ I .. ~ s, ~ / / ~ ~~ \ ~ f ~~ ^ ~ 9 V ~~ / / ~ '::r ~~~ / ~ '~'~ ~ cma x ~ I W ~ ~ ( '~~ ~ & '~ i ~ r ~ ~ e ~ - ~ a _ ~ ~. ~._ -- - - ~~ . ~ r ,F ;_ ~ i ~~'`4 ". ~ ` ~' ~~ ~ J i 'I ` ! p I ~ ~, d i ~ ~,'1 ~~ `/ ~ ~ g ~ ~ . ; o i' ~ r I r .~. r ~ I 96 ~ ~ , ~ ~~ ~; b ~ i i ~ ~~ ~ ~ s ~It ~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ I r ~ Y t ~' ~ ... ~ ( i.# ~ P,~ , ',~ V i 8..y .ZF~ .s. / u ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ r J ~ ~"~ f ~ r °o ,e / ~x"'nS~~ ( ~ ~ ~ i- ~ I c I ; ~ ,~ _~ zs k r ` ~ ~ ~~ ~° ~p ~ s s , apt r I ~~~~ ~~ ~= __ ' r %%° 's .s. ~ ~ ~ 9 ~9~~, rffr.u~g„~ 31 ~ ~ `r ~Ar `®.. ° t' ~ rio+ m q ~~ ~..vmaw.w.rK ~_/ ~ vuro~,mu ~°~'~ ~~" ~2 ~`I1~ `~~~A ~ ~/ -_n~ `mot ___ -~i\\~ I ~\.~~, , ~l1'+ ~ 11 t > (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ 1. ~ . ~~ ~_ . ~ `~;`I ~ ~ I/~:~~ ~/ S 3 z '~~ ~~~ ~~. ~g 1~ `off ~i ,~a I inch = ~ It rk. ~'I i - i I,I ,1 ~~I ~ II ~~~ 3 : , g ~I i P II g ~ III ~~ h~i~~ i' I ~~ I!' ~ i 1 III i~ .I i ~ I ~v ~ iI~ I If, 1 I'Q 1 i I e 1 r~ ~ . 1 r ~ / / ~~~ ~®®(/ ~ / ~~ ~~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~, f ~ ~,~ ~Y1~~ ~ ~ r~ 1 ~ ~ L N+u 4 ~ m d~ryry'' // //Z- _ ~ ~.^ ~ ~~ ~ , ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ 'o~ - ~ i3-~ 1 ~ ltd e ,; A~~ ~,S ,,~'~' ~' c ~~ ~ ~ 1 \ ~~ 1 \ ~.' ~ ~~, ~~ , ~ I 1 ~~ ~; ~ 1 i ~:~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ r '~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~\ \ ~ r !: _/ _ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ i F ~.Mw.~ ~ ~ ~ a 1 1 d F ~ G, ~~ p. ~, ~"" ~,~ ~ ,_ y ~ ~ ~ I.- 'A, ,.. ` ~ ~ ..._.-~ L ~ `1 ``~\~`~ `11.1 .. ...«..._ ..,.. f . _. _. ". na ~ I i 1 ,, ~ ~ r_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 .' . ,'\ "c' - '~ ~ ~ _ _ _ r ~~ 1,. ~ I '. ~ "'' i ' o _ 5.1 .... r1 ` \ . ,~. a ~ ,~ ~. , ~ ,;, ,~ ~ :;.;... k.,. _ .,* ,. ~: I> ~, ,:: ~, `• ~ %:~~ 8'I:. ,. t-: ;::: ;;~~'v%; ~. 5 4 1.i :, i ooc ~ `' a'.~~: ;;5 ~~ ~,___..... `..~~~ „ ~ a . ,„ rr;:;;_ ....,, ~.._ IAT , SET i ~ # \ II I ~Y• .r ,,.~ ~ - ` ~. 8,~ ~, 11 _ ~ ` ~ ~: ~ ~ -- I ~~~'''ppp~~1 9 ~ n. ,,.__._ .._. . ~\ ~. ..._.._. w.. ~ ~ \~ +6'As~ti,'^ ' ~r R ~ ITSP]' ~~qqv\ ~ \ \ 1 W L ~ II7.H1' ~ ~~ \ \ \ ~; ~ ~J - 11 a ~• ' ; ~7~. _ ~ 'a ab~ { ~., vq/~ ~~ ~vA<<FY pR/~ (Sp) r ~\ ~ cxrsnruc~ ~' f i \a4 ~ i ® ` ?$- '~' \ \ \ \ ~ \ ^, /ar.¢rala mov mlwra~awr eaeir \ "' ` / ~Y r/ ,~ ~ _ A \ J/ fitY,,' ~~ ~ A A \ ~ d~ \ ~~ ~/'yt \ \ ~ FC140 PARK Twm ~ \ 4+ ~~ ~. \ \ \ 'Cj \ <' ~ H ~ ~4~~ ~ v~ ~ V A \.. rux acm uors u- .. V'~ ~ ~ ~, v\ ~ ~ i ` ~ ~m~wxmn PAx¢ ~ .~ _ \ \ attas+ am e) ~ v `S ~` ~ ~ ~ h ~:~ ~ "~- ~~ ~ t ~ Oi" ~ V v '~> '~~ ~ ~ ,~. ~" \ e e Iew ~ .e. _ ~ ~ ~~.t FF ~ ,, r, ~.. ~~h HIV ; ~~~,• : K a s rstco h O ..._ .. ssnJ. w .~. ~ 3 ~' _0'~_ ~`"~ `z'' ' _ 1~ggFf' g ;`~''~a a 3 a ~ ~d a;=z o~~; a'~~ ~ ~ 5 o~< a$<> 0 0 r ;~ e ~i ~ Pl-W515 ~~ a~a LEGEND o ~,~~Y }}} ah / ~ WAIFR VIL1£ ~ ,T~, ~" ~ ..... OIAB STOP C^ 1 W / Q SAYIIAY ffkA YAIWDIF ~ 8,k ~~ Q SR914MA WMg1 ~ Q C~~ // /i~~/ © Fl[CiWC YNHtlf pff ~Nfy%, 9,{yy~, © CAS IEIG h a~ 6~~0' )( r~ eMa SPOT DMATOx ~ ~ / / . / / / 0000000 qq}I IEYNMJG NNL / ~ ~ ~ Ii00D ISTMtOlE YNt t' /~ .. %~y!' ~ a o - HOOD FgtE @ ~ _ .. ' ~/'Y .. A GRAPHIC SCNL' 8 ~~ '~ f /~, ~ y I . // J~7/ t l a 1¢r l --.- ElISIN01 R Cb11WP ~ .~~ t .` i wa • P 0. E)1YIN010 Ff Cg110M RNNYpI RCOi1Wl1 .~ -~ ~ :.. ..~ j /.A h I ~. PPoYg40 S ft (dIdIR _ . --._ 5~, ~ ~ - PDOPOSEp WPB ---"... _. ....._ _.._.. .. _ t. _... .... n PDEPJ3D REfAP1NG M41 . - _... _ - - - ~ "'~ ~ ~ ~ J .-~ ~ / t.. ~ \ ~. I 1 --" AIStNG i2~uJA'IOF' 10 FEUI-I Od ~ ~ ~ t IPROPCED RC(Y uRP/ /1 ~ / / / // .~/ W ~.5 ~ ~ .° .: 3 N /i 5 i ~ ~ /, y ~~ ~ ~ r /r h / i~~ R r~ ~ ~ i ~~ r ~ ~ ~/ _ _--- W...m a. ~ / ~ r ~ r ~ ! / ~ W : ~. _ . ~ , ~s ~ ~: ra a~ _ F / ` o~ ~ "~ 1 ~ I~ aS ~i~~~ ~ was uc--4-'d` i ~ ~f ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~y/ ~ ~ :I3~:F^ ~\ i /t. -~ i _. " i i _ _ ~ . ;~ ,_ ~. / 'cork ' - .Y , ~/ -- --- / ~ . b",. e 5 t C ////' ~ ~~ ~ ~ „ I /// ~~ ~ ~°`s°~ ~ ~A ~ I,~I ~ ~~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~, ' / ~/ Sri P ~ w'Lr ~ 8 II/ ~jCf~ I~ ~II ' .~I ~ ~.. 0 tl F~ J'" I ' ~ g a` ~~~ i~ f' /~ ~~' ~ ~. I as I 1 ~ e.'~. ~ ~ ,~ //~ ~:~ ~ ~ I a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ENERALNOTES~ A k" I' ~ ~ ~ n I ~ 1~ ~ak~~~ ~ / Dp .~ 1 l~~ D~ k n ~ n ~ I t ~ f~I a ~ ~ . ~~t ., ~ ~ ,.,~ ~~ rE,a~I ~ "l /: ~ se r ~~ i ors~rna<.vECro~~nuuammnm.w.~wa«.ons ~ ', ~ _ ~,~~_~ pp~ l ` i /L/ ~s ~ ~ a" °/. l~ ~. u W ~;,, - d / ~a, W ~9~rs.~ o,~ ~A I!~{#ts ~, p 7 _ ~ m ~u Y i u• ~ ~ ~ ~% ~fst ~ n<rs~ ~ ~ < / " i if // .. ~ 1 ~~~ ,. !r e' ~ ~ ~~,~ y i I ~ ../{1~ I .du, w.~~a..~ ~~°w°'~~`"~ °~w .j.i~t~ ~ a p t i r ~r W / ° 1 p'O~ a ^~~ j1~v~nyL kf~. ~~` _ ~~f_,. A` ~'/ mm«nE a.~vu m+mu,rm~mnwm.~u Aa Mw, J ~I.~ I~~ ~. ~ ~+~ ~' ~ n.a® 4 ,~~/ A ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~~ ~~W ,emu 6 ~ ~~ , ` ~ ~ \ 1 J ~ 1 ~ m,ao c o0 ~ ~~~ _- 1 ~ 9aa~ 4I c ~ `~ ~ , ~ a ~ ~ ,.... µ .. ,.,,...m Q~;E ~- L t d i ~..~ 6 V 0 r: \~ `~ ~ ~L, ~ 1 ( ~~a f ~ I " f ~ e~ p`c~. _/ r ~P ~ma.~rs„W~„~ W~~.~.~~M o ' 3~ ~_ . .. m ' ~ ~~ f of !~ .~,~sr/ _ __ ~ ~ f ~~ I ~ f _.' Y 8 R ~ ~,..rN. ~,. N.mw.,rcn Me.maM~~xAn Q °~i ¢ .~ '~ oen.W~n<n.WW~..~a 0 ff nWa°~,gmw P~ \ `1 ~ ~ ' iii - ~„~ `~'~ '~ ~ ~,{ _ ~ ,,''~ / ,~ 1 a 9 ~ ~-~ ° a - m c E ~ / E E n m~ ~, ~s~s ~ o m a a~aB~ ~~• m ~ ti ~ °Q m 9 9 o m o 3 8 ~ EsB~$~ ~ u m ~~ c omm a as x®Q n'E mEc9 N@ m@ ~~e m~ _ ~B ~ @ ~ U° w U°crna m~~ Uco QE~c OOmm m~ m~ o~ Qy & atS ,~. ~~i/ m 0 m L °L ~ N6lV ~W<V ~~~ 0I~9 mm6C aC 8L d%0 F% i~9§j ~..~ ._~ l w o m 3«c« ~ Qm« g~~ n~a 8°c nmm t~ e~ °6m $e i ~ mE ~ 2'-~° a=~ eo°~ eon dW~. n a °n Q ~ ®.. <~ _ aa~ aam aaa aaw ~>mn ~u v~ g$LL Q~~``~ ,.-®~,; - « w 9 n N v N O e C a / i / $' J 25 $~ ~ ~~ f !f i i - ® , i ~~~~'' i ~~ ~~ ~; ~ -, ~. ~J ~~ I~' a:g e 8:e ~E $S~~ ` Ewa ~~~f it € 1! "~ ~ 6~ 0. :/ '/ I ~' ~ g~ ~ff: ~ . ~',. i~ ~.~ :~. ~ b ~ s~~'~, _ ~ ~~'' ~ ~ - _ _ _.. i9~Be~ ~4 z`°n~~~ ~~~ ~~ e~, t ~~ ~ S~% E~~ j ~€$@ ~~9 i8g ~B~E 9 ~~~i 0 ~~~ ~F w~ fi~~~ ~~~ .E B a~~a ~~ 0 4 ®; Via= ~~~~~ ~, w~ € G~ °z ~, ~ "t'`~ s x a ~ Saz ~5 \ _° m _ g4 °am Ti° am« g 2 n ~a$ i"~ °v9° ~m~ma` oWma $a~~m~m f m~~W ?om;;~~,a m_QE vmaom~v a '¢@ =m 0 n m°~~W=S N ~gj vcw o~ vm my %, .~s_ n=°ufl n=Ea ~~°m ° F ~~ ° ~ m m ,c _ a ° m ° g~~ °_mt ~SUSmmm =$$99g$ u°q'~ E°2m°Sa 82~i mEnm ~~%'mna3 m mmv0« E; m~E~m ~ o EmEmE a~m~a~c d Z aw c`v5 WawKCmJ mm9ge ~ m 3onme .ma ~v `mvn ~ ~ cm_m« m_:~8om ~'~ vc Q~mac QNOmOEN J ia~ a :® ~ / Sheet ¶N°. AN® A~~ ® ®NI~UI~S Landscape P~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ Vail, Colorado Revised 0910b104 ~~ ~ _~!^„N ~ 1~ i C°~ O O ~' 0 ~'~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~" ~_. 0 0 ~ ~ `t k~ t~ 1'""`' R ~@, ~ '" :m Sx m I~~>~ ~z i-. R ~~ ~ .~ ~n E ~ Landscape Legend _ 6; Existing Evergreen Trees - to remain Existing Deciduous Trees - to remain Protect existing plantings and al a ' enhance with native wetland Existing Shrubs - to remain plantings including willow, birch - -~ and cottonwood along banks. - Delineation of critical Root zones ~ Equal to the ddpllne of tree I Existing Trees and Shrubs - to be removed ~"~ `'~~ t Proposed Colorado Spruce Add native evergreen plantings in I Pleea pungena ' ' upland areas for year round color s to 12 In height and Interest. Proposed Cottonwood ~' Populus angustifolia 4 2" In dia. (10'to 15'tall) 1 Proposed Aspen ~~ Populua tremuloldes 2" in dia. (10' to 15' tall) Areas of erosion along Mill Creek to ~\ Proposed Deciduous Trees I be treated with boulders and cobble Varieties of maple, alder, birch, ~ ri ra to revent further erosion. p p p i crebapple, and cnokecnerty 2" in dia. (5'to 10'tall) Where appropriate slopes will be i \ reduced to no greater than 2:1. Existing vegetation to be preserved Proposes snn,b Masaea and protected. Topsoil and seed to ~ as containers be applied then covered with ~ - Proposed Perennials ~ ~~~~~ erosion control fabric to protect I _ Flats or (1a) a" Pots Y~XXXi slopes. :. i I I Cl I Pathway leading to seating _ I~ I 'I area along Mill Creek ,~ 0 !, ~ ill ~~ :~ ~~ { ~ s ; MANOR VAIL LODGE R `~ ~, h1 _ ~~ ` ~ - 1 ' ~4Ep ~1 MILL CREEK IMPROVEMENT PLAN L2 ' " ~'"hP . 1 \ 1 : . ~ - 10 SCALE: 7 -0 MN4D 0!/LD/M ~ ~ ~ ~I ID __ / _ ^ \ ~ r ~ Add boulders and cobble where appropriate to protect slope -Reduce Slope to no greater than 2:1 Add topsoil, wetland seed and geotextile fabric to encourage nature) revegetetion and erosion control Add native wetland plantings along top of banks Mill Creek Cross Section -Typical Not to Scale LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY: NEILS LUNCEFORD -' aruw~a PuxxlxD mGPE DDVb~9a~n ,waLa~ra~mP,wxraT P.0 DD%rt]4 9il~Exi1M.11Nf,W Wq PXDNE ryN~bf6N0 FNIMAbf16 PROJECT MANAOErt- SuPen Mllla ®® ® ~{yy~ ~ T d~® d ll~~ ~®~0~1 V ~ ~U S EUILDING ~iEIGH'I' CALCiJLA'I'IONS n T.ITC/ iT'I'F d-iF ~ ( AR4f1T r v row t ,. kY~1 ~~ ~ "' ~t No cw ,~ ~~~ Vail, Colorado ., . -, u~ . i u~iinais~ Cv v ''° ~'~ ~ E°~~° _~~ ~~01~ L~ AO `SAIL AND®NII~II~J Vail, Colorado BUILDING I~EIGH'I' CA.LCULA'I'IONS ATTTiiITA:~ .T ~T~~ii~ii uvri~vi,nicu ~vivravuTDw r= m~ r~ ~, ~a r, ~ Sdcet Na Eaa~ Zot~ ao~nc. N A n MANOR AIL CONDOMINIUMS EUILDING HEIGHT CAI.CUI,ATI®NS T'Q'/ TDT3flA~C~'T, ~''~TeT'4'~TTT?C PRn~n~iin ~$Ta'i~"~ f ' I~ n ~ m' `~'$°' s~Na: ~~ Vail, Colorado . vn vva~ai aae..iA~iaa A/ Il A\VA VJa+L i.Vltl AVVAW r° ~'~' ~ ~~~~P.n°~ K-~.'1y Z E x a e n p ~o~~ L(~g t__._, m. aom ea BUIIrI9ING I IEIGHT CAIJC~JI.ATI®NS ! ": ~,~, NQ ; MAN®R SAIL ®~0~~~yS ~R~p~s~~ ~o~~ I~EIGI~T~ ~-~~ - Vail, Colorado ~°~'~' ~a,~,~R~~ L~N AUo~~ ARCHI'I'EC'I'IJRAI, ; , °°®.° ~, , 1VIAN®R AID ®NI')®IIIJ S SITE pi A1V i ~ ~ ~" "°o d J Vail, Colorado r~ ~'~' E,~W~~.,~~~ zo , p p E.N t~Go~~ \ \ ~, ~. GR EK _ ~ ~ DDR \ ~---- \ '\ _ _~ \ ~ \ 1 ~r - \ •-~ -,- - - .- --~- --^ °--- ---------- ~ 1 --- r -------------~ 1 \ \ \ 1 ~1 Ip ~ O •m ~ / \ 1 11 O ~ O 0 .. °O \ 1 ' \ ~ \ 11 1 s `\1\ 1 \ ~1 `1 \ 1 I ~ ~¢ \ \ ~ 11 1 ~ 1 Il' s i I / \ \ 1 \ 111 I \ \ 111 1 s / ~11I BUILDIND E ~` .\ I \ \ \ ~ ~ \ 1 ~,1 ,~ ,/ ~ ,\ \~ \ 1 ~` ; 1 ` ~~q ~~~ ~,,, 111 ~ \~\. \ ~,~ i 1, '`a ~\ \, \ 1 1 y ,\ \ 111 11 1 1tl I 11 D 11 \ \,7 \ \ ~ \ 1 ~1 1~ ~ 11 BUILDIND '1 \ ~ `1 1 \ ~1 I1 ~I 111 /~"d 111 `\+ \ \ \ \ \ \ \~ I ~ `I1 / W 1 `q \ `1\~A 11 11 \\\\\ ` \ \ \ \ 11 l 1/ ,\ + \ \ \ 11 ~. 1111 1111 y ~ `\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 ` 1111 '1 -= "- ~-~ / / '` ~` ~` ~ / / ~~ ~ \ \ 1, I 1/11 ~ / / / ~~/~ 1 \`` \\ ~~\ \ 1 1 / 1` `\ --\ \ \ ~ 1 ~ 1 / _l q`1 ` A I ~ 1 / wd 1 I ~ i / aab/w~ ~ / 1~ ~ i \ .. \ \ \ \ 1 .MJa / ~ ~ ' I / _ 1 I 1 /~// n q \~~ \` \ \ \\ \ 1/ X ~_'1 11 / \ \ 1 X111 J \~ \ \ ~~\ ~ \~ `\ I 1 - ~ \\ 1i "_ = DING B `~~, ~ ¢ ~~ 1 1 I1 A ~ AvD ^\ % \ ~~ ~.\ 4i. N 111 gUllDO~E - 1` _~ i ^ \ ~ \ ~ \ I 1 pB ~_ „^< ~ ~ ~ \ \ . 1 \ ~ s ~~ ~hQ 1 11 111 ~- 1/ \ \ \~F"~~ \ '1 11 ~~ r~` ~\ ~ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ,~~ "~` ~~ ~~. ~ ~\ 1 `. ., ,, ~ ~_, ~. ,, ,_, ., ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~~ TM= _ ` '--~ ~~ - `'~ ~ _ -----~--- 1 ```~ __~___ •J __~ `~~~, J- ~~__~'- T ~ it ANO AIL ~ON~O~N~~T~ Vail, Colorado EXISTING BUILDING PIJOOR PI.AN- ELE~IPT:~"1 8.?3 +_ ~.~ ~ Shee77t°°Na ~.__~ ~~daV6 E+a~ Weal P+eu~ ~E N R E N ~~~~ ~~~~ ~®~~~~~~~~~~ EXISTING BUILDING BLOOR PLAN- , ~,~ s~~"m ~~" ELEVATION 8183 / 8189 v~Ponnn MEHRET Vail Colorado ~°_ ~~ ~~~ ~ o , , ~ AD1o03 I Y~ i ~~~~ ~~~~. ~CC~~~~~g~~~~~ Vail, Colorado EXISTING BUILDING IiLO®R I'LAN- ELEVATION 8193 / 8200 ~~_ ~~ ~a~ ( ,.y., ~ Sheet Na ~~~Meo~o~ Z:.o~R..,N AD1o~4 ~R L~~' \ \ 1 / --r- p~~----------------- eU~-- E ~ 1 ~ BAIL pIN ~ \ \ \ \ 1 _ ______________ _ ~______________\ \~ 1 ' ~ ~ \ \ -~ 11 m. o 0 0 ~ \ ~ \ , ~- ~ ~ \ 1. ~, , ® ~~ \ .. n \° \ 1 \ \ i \~\ s~ll~~ ~~ r a. ~~ ~~e ~~\ \\ 1 1`~ ~ ~~~ i o ~~ ~~ \ v v v ~' ~~ ~ II~ 11 \ 1 1 ~rp11, ® \ \ \~ \ \ ~ 11 Q ~ \ 1~ ,~ O ' ® \ ~ ~'1 ~ /y ~~\~~~~ ~~ and ~/ ~\ \ 1 ~ 1 e \ / '~ ~ ~, \ ,1 ~ ~ \ \ / 1 ~ 1/11 / / @~~ \ \ \\ \ \ 1 1 l / ~ \ \ ~'~ l __,.~ _ '~ , ~ ~ / /1 "~~~ / `\ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ I ~ \ ~~ ~ ~~~ i r ~. ~ `\ \ I 1 N, ~ " ~ ~~\ \ \ ~ro ~ `\ .\ \ ~ \ I I+ ~ ~ \ \ 1 ~ ~ ~ `\ \ .\ `\ \ 1 1 ~ `~\ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 \ ~ l ~~ ~ ~ \ ~~ I \ ' ~ I ~ ` ` \ \ 1 111 1y ~` ` \\ \\ \ \ ' 11 1 ` ` ~~ \\ \\ ~ 1 1 y , ~~ `\ `~ \ \ 1 ~\ ~ ~ `~ ~\ ` ` ~ ` R \ ~ ` ~ `\ \ ~ \ ~~ ~` • ~~~. __ - -- ~-_ ~__~-" ~ ,,, ~.: yam ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~®~~~~~~~ ~XIS'I'ING BiJI]LDIN~ ~'I,®®R PIJAN- - sh~Ha: '~ ELEVATION 8202 / 8210 Vail, Colorado 1~= ~~ ~3~ Wes1 RMers Z E Po R E N Ad/ ~10~ \ ~ ~ ~pR~~REEK .. \ .. \ \ \ __-~ ---- r--~~------sue - ~-----~ ~ ~ 1 ~; ,-~~- Bu~~o~,,,c-~--------------------~ \ ~ ~ ~ \~ ------------ ~~~o~N t ~- - ------------------- 1~1 I '~' ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ... IF ~ 11 I W~ s~M s 1 \ 1 11 1; ~ ~ .. ~ 1 ~ ~, I ~ 111 ' - /~~ \ ,, ~ ~, ri ,, 'i .~ ~ ~~ ~, 1 1 1 I p, ~ ~ 1 ~~ `, ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ol` ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~`~ ? Y \ \\ 1 ~ ~` ~,~ ~~, 1 yP 1 G 11 ~ ~ \ ~ \ Np ` \\ ~ 1, ~,, ~1 ~I ~ ~ ~ \ 1, i ~ ~ P~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~/ ~ ~ I ~ 11 ~ ~ r ~, ~ , \ i \ 1 ~ "` ~ 1 _ y YYY... \ ~ \ .~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ n ` ~ \` ~ ~ ~ ~ ` \ ~ ~~ ` ~ ~ ~ '`~ \~ \~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ \ ~ ` \ ~ ` 1 1 1 111 \ ~ ~ ` \ , \ s\ `\\ ~ \ 1 \ ` ~ s\ v `• ` ` ~ \~ \ r \` s ~ ~ ~ \ ~~ \ \ ` `\\\ ~ \ ` ` \ ~\ `\~ `` \ \ ~\ ~ Y `~ \ s` ` ~~ ~ `~ \`~ ~~ '-~ _ -- ~,, ---~ ~ ~~ --- _~- °„~ --~_ \ ---~-_ ~- _ p }~~ ~ j }~~ }~ ~ ~T ~ T ~v ~XIS'I'INO BUILDIlVO ]FLOOR PLAN- r' ~,~ L~11~f ®~ `~ ~~~ ®1V ~~1~/11~1~1 ~ ~1 ~a~ ELEVATION 8220 ~ sn~ rra &~ Vail, Colorado ~•_ ~~ E.,~Wr.~P„,~ Z E HuR E N A~~,06 ~ ~ ~ ~ G~R~GREEK ,~ ~ ~ \ E-1-~- `\ ~- :-r=-s ,N~-=---------- ~ ~ ---------BU11-D --- pING \ \ \ ~ \ \ .-; ~'1 I ~~ ~1 \ \ \ I~ 1 \ \ 11 ~ ~~ °~ I I „u ~ ., ~a ~ A I '~ \ 1~ `~ \ 1 awl' I I I ~u~ ~. /~qU1 \ \ \ \ 1A II ~J ~I11 1 fl I I '`. \ ~~ \ \ { 1 LJ ~~ F 1I 11I `, \`\ \ ~ \ 1 I I ~ / \\ ~\ ~1 I II III ~I t~ ~ `\~` ``\ \,` \4 \ \ 1 1 ~1 \`\ \~~~ \~ 1 '1 ~~ II 1 ~~ ~ ~1lGING d~ \~\. \ 1 ~ `~~ ~1 ~ ~ \~\ ~ ~\ o~l~ \ I `"r \ 111 I ~\''~ `\~~, \ ~ ~ \ ~ 111' li ` ~ ~~' ~~ ~ \ \ \ \ e V ++ I' 1 ~ 11 I ~II` ~ ~a`~ \ \ E~ g1 1 \ ~` ~\ ypq \ I ~ \ \ ~~ \ ~1, \ 1 1 d~ ~ \ \ 11 1 // \ I 1 I I 11 I / / / / / \ \ '.\ \ I ` 1 d Vy"" I 1 /I~~ 111 I~__ 'III //~.~ ~ / / / / ~ ~~ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ I ~ 98A~ ~~ I ~~ / ~ I ~ \ I ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ I ' p \ 1 J i ` 1 I 1 1 ~, 3'V i~ ~ 4 \ ' ~ ~ ~ „, ~ '" , nom' ~' s" \ ~~ ~~`~~ ~ \ 1 ,11 ~ ~ I lP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ;c ~ ~ ~\ 1 ~' ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~\ ,~ ~~ . ~ ~\ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~. ~. _, ~ ''~~ '~~ n --- ~a '~_,.~_~ =~ ---" _, \ '---~"" ~ :.. ~ ~.: ~,m ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ EXISTING BUILDING ROOF PLAN ~ ~` Na ""~ r= m~^ Vail, Colorado EwRu~Pmnere qE,H R Erc AD~4~0 0 _ , ,, ~ ~. ~~. I ~-T- ~~ ~~ ~~. I . 1 1 ~ ~_ __ J_________________________ _____ 11 I _______________________ 1________________________________\ ~ ~ _- ®ucvx 1 1 i _ 1___T_ __________~` \\ \ 1111 ~ I \\ 1 ~ ~ .~a¢mee .` . ~ 1 ~. ~ 1 11 ~ I '_ _ _ rewuwaemc 1 II I . ~ ~ 11 1 1 ~~ ~ `, A 1 1 ., __ \ ,,.. 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~. \ 1 ~----r------------------------' ~. ~~s ~ 1 1 i i / 1 1 / / I ~ r r 4 ', / 1 ~~ ~ / \ \ 1 1 / 11 A ~ ~ `~ i 1 \ y~ 11 ,1 II / 1\I \ `f 1 , {``{{11 111 11 / 11 .'- \ ~`~ \ \ 11 1 ~ ~~~ 111 11 - 111\1 \ \ $ 11~ ~ \ 11 1 1 111\I ~ \~ 1 I 1 1 I 1 \ 11 1 1 1 1 1 11~ II r ' Po 1 1 \ 1l I 11 11 ~ 111\ 1 II 11 11 \ Tl I 11 1~ 1 ps Y 1 1 11 1 \ 1 ~ 11 11 ~ \ 1\ ~ iM" 1 I ~ II 1 > 1 V~~ 0 11 \ 1\ 11 1 1 Sp 1 \ 1 v 1 rt 1 11 \ 11 11~ 1 1 . . 1 '1 1 pt 1 g 11 1 11 ( y ~\ ~\ '~ ~ 1 ~1 1 1 / 1 ~ ~I 1----'1 .-i 1 1 / 1 11 ~.1 ~1, ~ ~ ~ / / / ~1~ / / /~~ 1 111 1 9 / / A / / 1 1111 1 / / / / ~, ~~ 11~/ \ 1 \\ 1 1 I --1 I `1 ~~%11 `/\ \111 / I ~ -- . '- T~ I y ~ 1 / \ ~~ i / r'" ~~ 1 ~ \ / ~ 1 I'll 1 t- 1 11 / 1 ,~ 1 ~ l 1 yea 11 l 1 1 --l \ ( . I 1 '- -- ' ~ \ 1 \ N I l-'~ l /~~ \ / \ 1 1 . l / 0 `\ 1 I ~ \ 1 1 I - ~ \ \~~\ 1~j1- 1_~c R 11 \ \.\>y~ \ ~ `\ 1 1 \ \ \\ ` \ k 111 `\~ \\`~ ` 1 \~1 1 `~ 1 \\ \ \\ \ `\\~~`\ . . ~~ . . . ~~ . . `\\ . ~ .~ .\ \' ~~ ~`~ \ \` NV `~~ r~ / _ ~ ~ --- I ~ --r-- ____ I _ ~ _ .~ \ _ m. w]m9a a'° pp 11 1 p ryy LOVdER LEVEL PARKIlVG GARAGE ~ {f~p~j\\ ~{IIll~ ~UdO1 ~1A~ Igo TIY~ Pae~Wen hMCrv 2~E H R ESN d i1~0~~ 1 1, 111 ~~ I 1~ 1 `~ t 1 ~ ~1 1 I1. 11I I 111f I ~pWt 1 I I I I 1 11~ I 1 1 ~~ 11 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 £ 1 111 11 ~ ~ ~I ,1 1 1 ~ ~ ~, 1, 1 1 ~~ 11 11 1 1 ra 11 1 1Q S~ 1 8 1 ~1 1 1 II all 11 ~1 I'~ ~'~ ~ ~ K ~, ,. / I ,111 1 ~ 1, ~~ ~ ; Ili , ,,- .\ ~\ ~\ ~\ t ` \ ~, q `~ \ \`~ ~ \~ \ ~~qry `1k \~ \y ~ ~ ~~, ° ,1 ~, ~ \ \' \ 1 11, '~, ~ V ~~, ~ 1 ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~\ 1 1 1 '~ ~~ ~~ 1 \ ~1 1 ~ \ ~~ 1 ! ~ ~ 1 ~ / \ ~a\ ~ 1 ~'1 \ "~ 1 '~ / \ -; ~, ~~ ~\ ~ ~-~ ~ \\ ~, ,~ ~~1~ \\ /'ll ~.cY/P.~v'- / / / X11 \ \~\ 1.P.~.,1 ~~~a. -~~a. ~~ i~ ,1 ~ ~: ,%~ ~ ''~ ~ ~,, ~'' ~~,; S ~ ~~, ~ ', ILL ,~ i 1 --- i ,, ice. ~~ ~,, I 1 1 11 ~ ~ i 1 -', ` / 11 l l~ - $ T~ \~ I 1 --' '- ''' '` ~~ 1 1 ~ \ `\ 1 ~ \ ~ \ ` s\ \ , \ .\ \ ~ ~ \. ~\ ~ `\ ~ :~ \ ~\\~ ., \ ~ _ _ \l~ `\'~ --------------------- ~~ ~„~a _ \\~' -- -- ~~ - r ---' \\~ --r-- --= =~ - ~~ ~ _~ \-__~ ~~ Vail, Colorado ~.,___ ,\ - ~. - - 1 ~\ ~ 1 ~` ~\ dad ~~ ~\ \ ,~° ~ \ \ \ I /' I ~ ~ ~ /~ //C N ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ UPPER LEVEL PARKING GARAGE /ELEVATION X173 t~ m~ ~ ~ m~ ~a~ r /r i Shed Nu: "(~~ Eaa Wm Pannere c~c~ 6 11~O~L .\ ,- 1~/,T- -- -- -- --~~ - --- --- ----- -- ---- 1, 11 4i 1. ,, ~ t ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~\ \ \ "i~.1 \a \~ ~ \ ,\ ~\,~, ~ '~, ~ ~' \ ~ ~, `, \` ,, \ , ,, ~~' `\ ~'~, ,~,~, \ ~~ ~~~ ~' d ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~, < ;<, ~ ;~ .~ ` \ \ J \~Vp •\l ~ ( ` \ `\\ \ ~ ` 1 11 1 l \\ 1 ~ \ o .~m. o :~®: 0 .~~~ ., ~~ I - r ` i.~ _______ _ ________ a .\ ~\ •\ ~\ \ `\ \`\ \`\ ~\ ~~`\ ~~ _ _ __r_- J ~gpEtY~~ \ ~- 8 W®®J1B Il LL.I181 V Qa: mm9a `" 1 ELEVATION 8183 / 8189 ~~ ~~ Vatl, Colorado ]"= ~~ &e~Weei Pannen .o ,H R E N D ~\ ~` `I _ ~ T i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ \ \ ~ .®smnw~ ~` .- -- --- - ,, ~ X111 ~' ~ ` 1 ~~ ~ ~~ 1 ¢~ o 1 1 ,. ~~, `~I ~,~I ~ ~ \ \ , 1 1 ~' 1 1 \~ ~' ~ ` \ \ 11 '~ ~` ~. 1 1 O® ~ ~ I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 :~ \ ~ 1 ~ .~, 1 111 1i 1 ; ,r-, ~- ~ y, \ I` 11~ 1 ,mss ~1~ ~P i 1~ - , ..~,, „ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ , -- ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ V'~,~ 1, 11,1 ~-~ 111 ~, ~ ~ 1 1 11 -~~ 1 1\ 1 I N ~-' "'~1 '! ~"~ ` 111 .~ \\ 'N - ~~ '° ~ I ,I1 1 111 ~j \\ \ 111 ~- ~ t ~ \\~ \~ \\\~ 9J 111 111 11; ~5='"J ~ I (~ '111 ~. ®®~I \~ ~1 0 1 N ~I ~^ \ 1 1 11 I~ I~ \ 1 ~11 It ~ ~ !~ 1 1 ~. ,~ i 1 n H 1 111 `\ ~ l~ F 1 .`~ \ 1\ 'I t 1 1111 ~ ,c=' ~ N 1 111 \~~`~ ~ / \ \ 1 N - / 1 1 1\ ~ '\\I~ \\ 1 11 1 ~ 1 I N '~ 1 111 1 1 I 11 1 ~ / 1 11 1 YYY ` \ 1111 I 11 11 ~ / \ \\ 5~ N 1 p1~ / ~ ~'~ ~~ i 1 ® B®® \\ 1 ® ~ I 11 \ \ \\ I \ \~~ '~" Qn 1 \~ q, I 1 I n«" \ \\ 1 ~ ~ \'+~4~ I ~ ty,, ® ~ yet, 3 ~ ~ ~Yr \ ` \ I II ® ~j~ 1 1 \~t \~ ~\ 1~, 1 ~ ~ ~ j 1 ~ ~, '~ ~« ~ ~ ' \ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ \ ~ ,.. .. , ,~ ------y--- -- - - n ~ ~~ ~ o '- ,.. _~ `., ~~.®®R PLAN ~~ '~,~' ELEVATION 8193 / 8200 VIaL, Colorado ~~ ~~ Eai~1'hel Rnnrn wE H P E N ~~~~~( ` \\ ~ ^ \ ~ J / _ _ T i 1 ~ ti 1 ~ ! -__ ' - __ - ---- ~; __, -- 11 { ~ ~. 1 X11 ,, .. ~,~,~, ~; ;, 1' ' 1 I I ~ .. `i I ~~ I L ___J _ _ _____ _ _____ 1 _.np< ~~ 1 Wv 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 11 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 ~\ 1 1 1 \11 1 `111~~ 111 1 ~ ~ l~ 11 1 111 11 1 I I ~ A II11 I ~ I lull 1,11 1 1 1 1 r~' ~1 I la a I 1 a 11 ~1 1 9 yy1 1 ql _--_ , - _ ----- ~ 11 .~~~ 1 1~ I, ~ I ~ 11 ^I / / 111 I / / j I ~ 1 1 '' ~ / 11 yP 1 ~ ~~ 1 ~~pOu" / ~ / // , ~ ~ ~ ~ _mif ~ ~ 1 /~ 1 ~ ~®fW"~ // 1 6 / W~ ~~ - 1 ~~ ~ 1 / I iV I / 1 1 ~ I 1 1 I I I 1 Y I /'^ ~. i, ~~ I ~1 1 11 1 ,, 1 ~~ .\\` \`\ \ ~ ~mmmawn ~ o ~~,. ~ ~ ~, ~, \ ~ 1~ 1 ` --irk 1 ,\ \Q ~ N ,11 \ ,~\ \\p ~%~ - }• ~\ 111 ~ \ 11111 [1?, ~~~\ H ~ \ \ \ 1~n 1 ly \ 1 \ \6 ~ ~ '~ 1, ~ \~ ~I 1~ \ ~ .~ 1 \ .' t 11 \~\ 1 `1\ \\ i" 1 ~ may) 1 \ . (~. ' 11 \\~ \ \~ 1f '~ 1 \ \ \\`\ . 1 11 \ \~ ~ ~\ 1 y ~ ~y ~~ ~~ i ~ ~\ 1 i ~ 1 s% `y ~ ~1 1~' /1 / 1 \~` \ 1 \ \ `\ \ ~\\ \ \ \ 1 \ \1\~~ '•' \ / \\ ii \ \ \\\\ r ~ ~ ~ + \ \ \ \\ ~~~~ ~ \\~ `\ ~~''II = - -e~°~ - - - ~ ~ --------- \ \ \ _--- - _ ~ ~ Shit Na ELEVATION 8202 / 8210 ~~ ~~ 0 ~~, Colorado Iti ~~ E.w Wnl Rnnen mE ~R E N C i ~- - T- _ _ 1 ---- ---- ~ ilk _ - --ti.s- .- ---I 11 1~ 1 ~~~., z~, 1' 1 ,i~~'„ ,~~~'` 1` I _, P~ I 9 `i III i _~. _.'~" - - ~ - - ' U11 I __ _ _ _ _~__ l _.. Ali 1~ L 1 \\~ 1 I 1 1 ~ ti 1 1 1 11\~ III 1 1 1 1 1q 1 ~ 1 9 c 11\~ 1111 1 1 1 II I 1 I 1 1 4~^ 11 1,1 ~III1 1111 vI .I fd `I \ Id t 1 j\ 9 111 Y\ A I 1 a`. \ \\ 1 -- ----- ,\ ~ ~ 11 i1 ~ / / x11 / / 11 / II / 11 / 111 ' / / --. 1 . /~ / / IJ I ~MI/6~y'" 1 I ~p6 / 1_y~ _ 1 yMtM/ 1 / l~ / ~ I 1 I ~ I 1 I 11 I 1 I 11 I 1 11 I 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 l \\ \~ ~ ~. \ \ `` _\ ~ ~\ \ \~ 1 \ \ \\ Q \ vv v~ ~ \ \ \~ \ \ \I ~ \ ~ \`I~ 1 \ \ \ \Y \ ~ \~q I\\ \ ~ \~ ~` \\ \~ \ \ \~ \ \ \ `\`\\ I \\, \'' \ ~ ' ~~ ~\ ~ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\\ \ 1 / / \ \ ~ ./ \\\ \ \\Y ^\\ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ I, \\ o ~~ ~~\\, \\ \,\\ .\ \ I \\ ~\ \\ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 \ ~~ 11 1 ~~ ' 4; \\ \ ~ 1 , \\ ~ \\\ ~ \ \~ \;~ \ \ `/{S` .J~\~``\ __________ S< AuF8tt W9 _ \`` ~ C ~~ n ` \ _ - ~~ AAr~ \ ~ ~~ 1_ I ~ I \ \ ~ ~~~ __ _ ~ - Oai mm4LY "~ ELEVATION 8217 / 8220 ~~ ~~ 0 ~~, Colorado ~~- ~~ ~~P+~+~~ Z E aA~E N ~ .cm~aom. o ~~ ,v ~ ~~1'(1 .~ . ~\ ~\ •\ ~ \ ~ ~ `\ \ ~~ ` \• ` r- T 111 -- ~ V ~ ,~ 1 ~° ~ 1 1 V °~` 1 ' 1 ' ~ ~~ 1 1 ~ '~ `~1~ ~ 1`~ 11 ~ 1 ~~ I~'~ ~~~ ~ A 1 S Q Bi ~ ~ ~~~ ,~ ~, s ~ ~ ~\' `\~ \ ~~ ~ \ ~ ~~ ,~ \ ~, \ ~ ~ `,, \ `,, ~ \ \ ~ ~'~,,, ~ \ ~, ~~ ~ '~ ~ ~~, o ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~~ I I I ~1 t 1 ~\ \ \ , ~~' ~__. \ ~\, \, `~ ~ ~ \~, ~ ; < ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ >~° - -~~ ~° - --~ ~_ \ ~_________________ R \\-_~~~ ~\ ~ \~~ ------ ~ - _ . ~ ~~®~ ~~~~ ~®~~®~~~~ VJ dn1i~ S~. S~~ll~~~ a~ t :., ~ Shee! Na `~ Vail Colorado IL'm'-0" EuiWn~Rnnen 2E,HRE,N ~~~~~ o. ~ ~. \\ --"- 1\ \ - - - ~ 1 \ ~ ~~ ~ `~, ~ `~ ~ -~a~. .~cvA o ,~w. ~, ~~ .\ .\ .\ ~\ `~ \ . \ ~. ~. `~ .~ _-~~ ~ _, ,- T- , , ~ 1 'I ' ` 1 `I r - - - --- -- , 1`V 1 _, , , ~~ ~ 1' ' - - ------ - - ,~1 -- , ~V 1 1 1 1 1~ 1 1` ~( ~ 1~~ ~ I I ~, l~l ~, e 1 ~' "~ ~i __-~ ---~ --~ ~ 1 ~, \~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~' ~~ / / 9 / I /~~~M'~ / / / ~ I i I ~ ~,~~~ ._ i ',, ,, 1 1 '' I 1 ~~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~\ ~\ ~~ -- ~ `~~ ~\ , a ~ ~ ~~ ~e~ \~ \ ~ ', ,' \ \ ,~ , , ~ , ,~\ ~'~, ~ ~ '~, ~'~, ~~ , ~ \ ~~, , , , ~;,, ~~ ~,, ~~ , ~~~ ~~ ~9 '~ ~' ~'~, '~ t ~ ~`, ~, \ ~ ~ \~\ ,, , \ \, ,\ ,~ 1 ~J , \ ~ 11 ~ ~' ~ 1^\ \\\~ 1 11 \ \\ ~ 1 ~ i~ .~ \ \' \ \ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~, ~, ~, ~ ~. , -- -- \ t '~ ~ , "~ ~e ~ ~ \ ." ,~ ~ \ ~ ~,,~p \ \ W"' ~ ` \ ~ \ _ _ ~. 1 ~~ ~'~ .,, , \ \ \ ~~ I ~ ~~J / ~ I ~~~ ___ I __ ~~ _ ~ I ~I~~ Vail, Colorado R®®1F P~,AN ~~ o .a~~,a o ~~~ o ~, ,,. ,~~r~ .\ .\ •\ ~` ~ \ ~ `~ ` \~~ `\ \• ` m~ mmA~ (, ~J sn~e rra Eai~Wni Pann~n ZE H~R EaN ~~0~,~ I ~ ~,..; .... . '•~,, j.::: ,, r` ~ I ,: ' I '~. ~_ i ~ '~. .: i ~~ ~~- I I ~ i '~. I i ,\ I ( ``'`~ ~ _ '~ .I .I I BUB,DMGF I `~- ~ (ABOVE) '- ~ ~I I w ~ I I ~~ L, , I I ~'~ ,~ ~ ,," I ~ I I I I ~' I ~,I I . '. I I, I I: ~ I~ . I' I ~ 'S'. I i o ~ a:' c ~I',o I: . o: I w: ~I .a I ¢: I w I~ I I io- I: I i I I ' i ~ I: I I. I ~' I I~il ; I ~ :~ I I I~ II ~~ a I 8 I 5`°' w' ~ARpINAG i ~ ~g I I .DaA 1 8: I. I I_ I I; I is 01 '' a I: I I i ~I I I I ~ I ~. ICI' ~' I ~ UI I I i ~I I I I yI I I I ~ I d~Vl ; r I ~ I I i I ~ / ~ zB-o I, II S I i ~,~ I -~, '~--- nwnn~ ~~ ' ~~ ~~ I -- P^"y r„;sew ! i ----t- ~ .__ ~ _ ~ I I -- -- --r ~ ~- ~~ 08161 ~~ I I i --~ -~ -- - + i f I ~ , ~ ,: ~ ~..~ , ~ -- ° t - t --t ' ~ ~ --J-- - ~~,~~ ~w~ _ - M~ e 0AI611f k nuah 0els:.is ~~ ; v I I I I I I I NORTH EDG E OF EXISTING BJGRESS EASEMENT ,\ ,\ 1 ~~ \ \1 \1 I 11 \\ 2o,A cK ~ Sg'SBN \ I 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 1 I 1 I 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 I'1 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 1 I I 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 I \ 1 +_ I 1 111 \ 1 ~; -------~ I 1 I \ I ~ I ,, 1 I I I III I II I II \ I I 1 \ I I I 1 I I 1 I I II 1 ~ I 11 1 I ' 1 \ ~ .~~~ .~.~~ .~~,.,~~ .~~~ ~ .~,~,~ ~ .~~.>o~ ®.wmewuua~ .~.ulo ~uwz~ ~~~ A 9 I I I ~ . 1 ~$ I ~ 1 I I ~ I A \ P 11 I ~ 7, I I I 1 ~ I I 11 r pp ~ CO a I 1 , 1 \~, ~C I I I 1 BUILDWGD , 11 1 (ABOVE) ~ 1 \\ I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 \ I I I I I I I I , 1 , 1 1 `, I 1 \ I I I I I I I , 11 1 \ 1 \ I I I--------~ I ~ ' I I 1 11 1 \ 1 I ------ ----- -----------I ---- I - 1 I 11 \ \ -1 \ I I \ ~~ I~ 1 ~o IT~ (~ ~ ~+ ~~ Shcet Na ~,®R 1<,~VE~I ~AR~CING GARG~ ~~o~~ Vail, Colorado 3~~ t~~ e.a1~,1~.~~- zp KKR E: I `/ I I I 1 §I ` I ( I i I I ~ Ik I m I I I II ~ I ~. II ' II I I I Q I I I ( I I I I I 1 II I I( /(~ n ~I ~ ~ ~ II .J I I ~, zC I ~ I o ~ ;4 0 ~ I ~ °( IR I~~ 1I 1~ 4 I ' I IJ II I I 1 I I i ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ;I I I) I I'~ I I ~ ~ ~I I I I a i I I 0 5~"B~ I I li QI ~R}1EVAG §I I AE I I I ~~ ,°`° s~II' I II 1 I I I + I 'I VIII ~ ~ ~ ~ it ~'I, I 1 ~ I I `J "I' I I UI I I ( ~ ~~~ 1L1 I FI j ( ~ I vy I I / I I I / I 1 1 I / I I / / / I I I II I / ' I ~ 1 ' / I ~" SETB~A ' ' ,~ ~/ ~ I ~~~ xl~w T\ ~ ~ ~~ _ _ ~ ~~ ~ \\~~~ ~ ~ ~ I \ ~_1 ~ -_ lMli ~ ' OB71 RI uwa uw+o ,``xm ~7 I OBS Q p~puN17 al OBJ ma. IFa. 0 uwio I I a i ~BIn 6I I I I I~ ~ I ~Nn I 1 cmusv I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I i I 1 I I I I I BUILDING F E (N) BUH.DING AREA OVER SETBACK (6 CSF) (N) BUB.DMG AREA OVER SETBACK (8 GSF1 F- - ~ ~ \ ~, ~\ ~ ~ (L~ BUII,DING AREA OVER \ \ SETBACK(2GSF) ~ \\\\ ~\ ~~ ~ \ \ \ \ \\ ` - ~ ~ _ ,~ 1 b ~L _ 1 1 my I 1 ~ I 0 O _ 1 I 1 I O I 1 1 '-,1 ~ 1 Yg 1 1 1 \\~ wi 1 bs 11 l ~ 1 1 I 11 1 11 1 1 A 1 wWd 1 ti0 ~~ \ 1 ~gP ~ S 1 ,~ 1. BUILDING E 1 1 1 \ 1 ~, 1 1 1 1 11 , 1 1 1 , \ 111 1 1 1 1 I ~ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 mrv 80 svw v ~ MvaR A 1 . P i i a.µ n0 a-°°° k ~~ ~0~?S'~ ~.µ i I F ~ ' _ 5 ~ NORTH EDG F C MGRES~EASEtv1ENf E ' \ 1 11 ` \ imu // 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 AREA OVER I ® SETBACK (21GSF) li (E) BUII.DINC \ I I ,' ----- AREA OVER I II SETBACK (17 GSF)\ II m I II RI I 1 \ ~~ I III i O~P~ 111\ 1 \ 1 M 1 ool 1, \ I~ ~l°I 1 II~ I 1 1~ I T 1 `1 ~ 'g 'I n I '1 ~p ~~, 'I~ II ! 111 ~ \~ II I I o I I 11 1~ \O II I BUILDING D I 11 ~ d II I 1 1 1 ~ I I 11 II I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 \ I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 11 \ 11 I I I I ~ 1 \ 11 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I l t I I 1 1 I I 1 \ 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 \ ' I 1 1 I 1 I I l 1 I I 1 ` 1 I ~ l l 1--------II 1 ~ 1 I 1 I ' ' , \ 11 I I I ----------- ' ~ - 1 ~ 1 -1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 I~ t~ ~~~ Ip I~ E~.®®R P~.A~1- ~JPPER ~EVIE~, EAR~][N~ , ,, m: ~`°°° ~~~~ ~~~~, ~®1~~~~[~~1~~J~I~ ~ARA~E ~ Et1IlL~~N~~ ~ E ~ ~ (E~EV ~~7~~ ( ~ JA~\ ~IBNa : l,III ~ BuuW iPaven Ze,:wo vEN G 711L0~1L Vail, Colorado 3,~ ~-~ ~~~ m: as®0.m ~/T ~v,~TTO~ sip ~ ~~a~~ Vail, Colorado 3~~° r~ Eav Weer Pannere u E~H R E N /p~~ ~/~~7 ~ T Y ~®®~ JL 14J1 8~~ 6I~IlLLJ1V81 V V~ [ L W IV ¢a~ OC~4a ~~®~ ~S Sl~~ ~~~~®da~l~~~ ~1J ~~ ' ;, /~~ Shed Nu \~T~ / Vail Colorado 1E1L1E~1A~'~®1~1 ~1~9 ~-`' t~~o~~ ~ 3~~° Y~ Eaa~Wm~Parmere ZauH R E.N ~~ ~ i~~ ii I ( ~ I i i I a i s ~ i 1 A ~ ~~ ~IA ~ 1I ~ I II 1 I( ~~ i ~~i ~~ (~i~ w I a o ~A ~o i ~ I ~~( W '~~ wl ~ ;~ y ~~~~' it I I I II i j, ~ ~ i (Q i ~~ I II' a p S'-0" I ~I ~AG l E I I ~I I ~ '°~ " OI I / I 1 I II 1 I I/ ~ ~ ~~ ( ~~ I I / ) I I I I / / I I / I I I ~ ~ ~_ // I 1 / 2B " ~ 1 / ~ SETHAC ~ '` I ~ ~ JlJ' ~~ - ~ (N)BUILDING AREA ~ OVERSETBACK~GSF) ~ \ ~_ `~ \ `~~ ~ " ~~ ~ ~ ze1 I ~ uert I 1B5 ~ al I a ~ ~" urtrt _ 1&1 , ~ D uert ~ 0 , 1BI ~~` ul I ¢ 0 - ~ _ ~ ~~_ ally _ ~_ "~"0°'" luwr 11% u~oci0 urvrt '~~ ~~ "®.aa uwl a I I a".r 1~ o °~' o ~"rt 1~P I ~ ° ~" UILDING F 1 I /~ (E~ DECK AREA OVER SETBACK (I I GSF) (I~ BUILDING AREA ~ OVER SETBACK (8 GSF) ~ (E) BW.DINC AREA ~ VER SETBACK (2 GSF) \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ` \ \ ~'\ 11 `` ` ~ 1 armu uwr ~~ _, yA 1 1J1 0 1 i ~1 , uwr z ~ I 115 1 urm O 1 1 1 1 1 1 M" 1 1 I 1 _ , ~ 0(tv UO 1~ '~~AGK \ ~ \~ ~W ~ I IINrt I 3 1 TId I u, Q I 0 I (~ 1 I \\\ I v~ ~~ I ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I . I I ~ ~ , I ~ ~ ~ i I i ~ , ,~ ii ~~ ~`r------- i II -------~~ i ~i II ~ I I II ,I II 1 II II II I ~ 1 , ,I L I II J~ i 1 1 t II II I~ PANG PATH \ / 1 Y ' / _____________________ i ii ~' i ii I ~ i~ i ii ~~ ----- --t--=--_ - ~--------- ' I' I NORTH EDGE OF EXISTEVG INGRESS EASEMENT ~ ~ 1 I ~ F. / , ~ i i C(6 D r____ ____,I I ~~ I ~~ ~ I~ \, 1 ~ \ -- - -~ uHrt I 180 O ~i unxo i uHrt 185 , uwr 160 I O I "~~ UNrt MI uvurv \\ ~\ ~\ \\ o ~~~"~ ..... .~ Ewa ~.mwm ,,.. _~ow~wu ~- ~~~ ~~,..m"ro ,_ ®.xaw ryw~~ua A 0 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 ~` Sp A" ~- ([~ HUH,DING AREA OVER `~ SETBACK (9 GSF) 1 ,-} (M) BUILDING AREA OVER I \ETBACK (33 GSF) ~, 1 1 -(E) BUILDING ~ I li ~ I AREA OVER ~ S ETBACK p7GSF~ - I ~ q S CRFA) ~ i 1 1 (I~ BUH.DING ` ~, AREA OVER E B 11 ,~ S T ACK (8 GSF) \ 1 I I ly l (E) DECK AREA V \ i I O ER SETBACK 21 GSF ~~ ' 1 > \ , o 1~ 1~ 1 ~ 1 1 $ 1 C1 .9 11 ~ \~ ,'f. I ~ ~' f n \d I li ~ 1 1 1 1 1 u 1 1 1 \~ 1, 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l ~ 1 l 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 ' 1 , I 1 l l 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1, 1 op~~\~ , \ ~~ ~1 P~7f11 ~~ 1 ELEVA~'~®N 3193 Vail, Colorado 3~~'"e r•(r EvniW'ertPvnnrn ~E H"R E N ~~0~~ u"rt sE 11" ~ ~ so 1 ~" 1 "rt - 111 ~, ,~ a~9.o o iING E ~ uHrt ~ 0 1 1 \ 111 , 1 O 1 a 1 i uNn ~+ 11a ~m~ "`~,° O \ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 1 1 ----- >,~ ~,~ ;I ---- ~ I9a~ l 1 is l \\l~ 11 I, ry I~ ~ i ~+° ~~ ii iii I a" p ~i uNrt 1 i unrt i ur ~ ~~ uvwc 166 I I O 1 ~; ~ I 1 ~I n n ~ UIN 161 ~o uurt 161 1 j I. I I I SOUTH EDGEOF EXISTING INGRESS EASEMENT J _ - _ _ _ - - - - - ~ - _ I I z ( 1 I u~ I ~ (E)BUH.DING AREA OVER I SETBACK (441 GSF; 399 GRFA) ~ I ( ~ (E) DECK OVER SETBACK ((6 GSF) _ , I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I e4.~4,7i I I I ~~"~~ ~ r~ i r~ ~~ r~ _ I I u~ TM atTM a~ a~ ~m u a '. ~' ' ~I ~ ~ NC I~ I ( ,, 1`II 2 7 1 S 6 1 8 9 I° II 12 17 I~al I7 16 i7 IB 19 20 } I 11 ~~ 'I, ~ T 2. ~~ ~`~ \ ~ (M DECKOVER ~~ 1R410 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SETBACK(64 GSF) ~~ ~ .~ ([J) DECKS CANTB,EVERED OVER PROPERTY LBJE (34 GSF} , uwu V`. '~ ~~~ ~ ~ AREA OVER ' a \ \ SETBACK (68 GSF) \ `1,. i0 ~~~~ (E~DECK OVERSETBACR I (1467 GSF TOTAL FOR %~\~ \ \~BUILDING C) ~'~ `~,~ ~~ (L~BUILDING AREA ~`'~~ OVERSETBACK - (3$lBCSF;3,084GRFA ~ / ~ `~ ~ ~ TOTAL FOR 15 ~ ~ (I~ BUILDB4G v ~ ~ " ~~~ ~~~ AREA OVER '~ z° 1°°10 ~ ! + \~ SETBACK (260 GSF) r as /~.~ (1~DECKOVBR 21 ~,~„ ~~~~ sETBncx(3scsF) ~ ~ a<nl o- D ~~ ~~~"a~ /~ l y~~j9 / n ' oU ~ ~ ~~ _ N ~ ~~_~ I BWDINC C- CONI]MI® ~~ ~~\ ~~ \\\ \~ / Y \ `~ ~,/ ~ ~ ~~ ~,~ t,~ "\\ ,! ~' 1 uwa aw ~ ~ azo u ~O __ 2. '~ )BUB.DBJGA _' OVER SETBACK (186 2Ty LINE GSF,139 GRFA) (E) DECK OVER ACK(16GSF) s am,mmon I ~ 0 B3W 39 `1I 1 t 11, - 11 l 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 ` ` ` 1 1 1 1 111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 'I 1 I I I ~ I ~g 1 t I I 1, P1uuim °`` ~ 1 6 1 1111 v~~ 1` UL ` ~ 1 1 1 1 ([v~ DECK OVER I ' SETBACK (193 GSF) 1 ' ~ 1 n 1 1 ~~ I 1 ~ \ ( `\ A \ ` (L)DECKOVER 1 li ` SETBACK (68 GSF) ~~ 1 ` , I 1 I ~\ °24°5 I1 1 `\ '~ ' ,I I (E) BUB.DMG AREA ` ~ \\ OVER SETBACK ` `~ ~ <. (11I GSA; 99 GRFA) `~ (N) BUILDING AREA 1 ~ I ~V OVER SETBACK (269 GSF ` \ ~~ `. (I~ DECK OVER `1~ no0„ SETBACK (28 GSF) \ I I K (E) DECK OVER I\ °`" ~ - SETBACK ~ ~~ ~ 1m y (1461 GSF TOTAL FOR ~\ ~~ ~~ BUILDING C) ~ ' ` ~ 'S" ' ~ (E) BUILDING ` / 3 AREA OVER SETBACK (3,218GSF;\ ~+ \\/\ /` ,~~ 3,084 GRFA TOTAL \ FOR BUH,DING C) NC ~ \ \ ~~ u~o~-~ ~ ~ ~ A \ ~ ~ < 7 ~ uwo,o \\\ \\ \.,~ \ p s \ '~, `4\ 7 ~" A $0 9 ~ .. ~~. u ,al I7 ' tl tp y` \1" _~ _ `" ``` `` 76 21 27 ~ u r~ } 26 IS 27 ~ / PROPg ~ z9~ ~, ~LtNE 7e ~ ,73, a ~yz \ `~ 71 ~ \ ~~ \; ~ ~c n ,o / ~~J uvuz [~ \ oaau, I //'/~~\\ N /~ \ / / I9 7A zt ~\ , ~~R ~ ~~, \ti' J~ R \ ' ,~ a _ y(p~~y( y'~~y(~~yy FIJ®®R ALAN- IIbJII.,I~IR1~S A, I$, ~ C , ~.. m: ~4>~ 6 lll ~l ®~ ~~~~ ~®1 V ~®~~A V ~~~~ I ~ Sheet Nu ~I~EVA~'I®N ~~00 K/A\\\ 9 Vail, Colorado 3~arn ]'-0" Eaaz SCee~Pannere Zo RJR Erc d JS~CC~~ ~ r ~~, ``` ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~I \ i ~~~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ( i l ~ ~+ i m i I i,I' ~ uNrr ~ i 4 r i ~ it ~Il ~ `"°"'~" ) i ~ ~'~ ~ .. ~ ~~-, x Ili I / l~~ar o l it al I , _ ~ 'l ~L_ _ l ~ i _ l I Iii ~I i If } I I` I ~I ~1 , ~~ iI w ;a~ I ~ O I iA ~O i i ~ ~ i z ~ ,~~ i i 1 U~i~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~) ~ ~ , ~ ' ~ ~ ~ III i ~ i ~ I ~ ~l' ' i 0~ ~ ~ ~ 0 S,A,~ I ~ AG,ry( 0 ~A EMENT Iii ~i ~I ~B,A„ ~ ?i~ cI ii "'i ( i I i I ~i ,,, l I I I~ ~I ~I ~ ~ I a~ i i Ui ll ~ I /n~/II WTI I ~ /~ I / ~ / I 1 / I 1 I 1 / I / / I I ~ I I ~ // I ~ SETB~A ~ ; / I %' ~ ,d / ) `~~ _ (I~ BUBAING AREA OVER SETBACK (6 GSF) ` \ ~ / w~.o -_=an.. ~mvr ® ' °~.-~_ ~_ ~ ,~_ _,®Q a a ` ~ 0aw~s` ~, I~ MRf O ~ _~ ¢! ~ O ® ~ Oe~- _~ ® ~~ BUll.DMGF __,~ _ n.~.ca~ --- ~ i i i i i _i _ i i (E) DECK AREA OVER SETBACK(I I GSF) ~-(N) BUB,DPIG AREA ~ OVERSETBACK(SGSF) (E) BUILDBJG AREA OVER SETBACK (2 GSF) ~ LMIT ~ ~ I '£woa~ 6{6 '1 IINCi~~\\ 1 SEgA~ \ o ~ v ~` 1 \~ o~ ~ ~° , ~~ i1 1 \ :m ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ BUB.DBQGE . ~ ~ ._ ~ ., V . ~ `. ~ \ \ ~ ~\ \\(^ ` \ ` 1 °"E ~- , 1 )nom ~ _, 1 u~~~ O ~` 1 ,~ ,1 ` uNrr ~ i 1 1 a 1 1 ~~ ~~ Fa O 0~,~ '~, ~ [~ ii i i i o~ ®I i i a i i i ~ ~~ ,~° ®° ~~ BUII.DQdG D ~ I I ~~u I I ~ UNIT ~ vdtx II I I I 1 I I uvou I I UNff 1 i i ~i I NORTH EDGE OF EXISTING INGRESS EASEt,TENT ,\ ~\ ~\ ~\ ,\ ,\ .~awn.~ooVn -~, . ~ owrvo~. .i .~~~ -~~~ L----, .~~.,~~. -~J ~~~~~~~ `~ i a a \` c 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ - (Iv') DECK AREA OVER '~ \ SETBACK (lO GSF) ~\ 50'~R dYN~ 1 ~' (I~ BUB,DMG AREA OVER I ~ ~ i ~ETBACK (771 GSF; 126 GRFA) ,, ,, ~ ~~ ~~ ~z ~ F ; ~ ~ ,~ r~ ' ' qq l j : 1 (E)BUII,DING i ei i~., ~°0°' ` AREA OVER SETBA K ` I ~ M ~ (17 GSF; C SM ~~ ~ ,9 GRFA) \ ~ ~Y I uMr u ® u P (N) BUILDING ~ AREA OVER ii ~ ~ i ~ SETBACK(9GSF) ~ p to i ' \ 1 ~ i ~ (E)DECK AREA i ~~ i i ~~ OVER SETBACK 1 I ®~,~ \$ ~~ ~ 1 o ~ 1 \$ i ~ i ~ I d '~ ' ~ ~~ i un ~ i ~i) _ mI 1 1 uvdo I I ~ 1 1 1 1 \ l 1 ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 umrziv ~ry~T ~ ~ ~ uvn+o ~ '1 1 ~ ~ ~ I i 1 l ' \ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ' i i i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ` ~ i i i i _-_ ~ -- 1 1 ~ \ 1 ~ i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ all, Colorado 3~"~'v P-0' E¢#~®i Panne Zo.iHoLR4, N 6 L~OC~~ II'~ \~~`\L Y/Bmltttl ~ i I / _-__.. use i ~ SOllTH EDGE OF EXISTING DIGRESS EASEMENT -{ - i ) ~ i ) I I I i ~~BUIl.DBJGARE~OVERSETBACK i ) ~ ( ~ (E) DECK OVER SETBACK /( (~aGac) i i i I ) ! ~ ) i I I `,II ( ~: I'~~ Hart ~~~ ~: ma ~ 1 II . i i i ~ i I i ~ ~ 1 vuno~rtl ®sooul I~1~ '.ww~ y~ ~~uw•re~.mul ~~awl ""'+vuuo u+~so~n ` ~y~ V`~ ~ ([DECK OVER ~~ ~ i `~ SETBACK (64 GSF) \ N (1~ DECKS CANTILEVERED j `~.,~ ~~ OVER PROPERTY LINE (34 GSF) assn ' ,~, . , 1 ,'~ ~ ` ~ BUILDING 1Q1BQ" ~ ~ AREA OVER ~ ~ ~,,,. ~ `~ SBTBACK(68GSF) ~, ~~ ~ ~\\, -~~~ ~ (E)DECK OVER SETBACK \ ~ i (1467 GSF TOTAL FOR ~,~ ~ ,~~ ~ ,~ BUILDD1GC) °A00N ~ ~ ~ (L~ BUB,DINC AREA ~'~'P,,, u ~ ~ \ ` OVERSETBACK ~~ ~~~ / (3,218GSF;3,084GRFA ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~`~ TOTAL FOR ~ ~.~~ ° ~BU!LDLuGC) r ~ (C>) BUII.DING ~~. ~ / ~ V `~~ AREA OVER 1NN0 ~ ~ ~ / ~~\ ~` `~ SETBACK (2611 GSF) ~.w~en~ f ~ ``,~ (11~DECK OVER `.,, ~ .~. ~ ~.• . ~6TBACK (35 GSF) ....~ m ~\ ~~ , ~ `\\ ~ia»surr \ uro« ~ c _ ry BUIIDING C- CON71N11® BUILDING A ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \ `~ `~ '~ ~0siom `; ~... ~n,o u r ~~~ __________ ___ iH4tt ~~ . i -----_ ~~~ ) BUQ,DING AREA OVER PRO L~ ; ~/ SETBACK(l86 GSP;139 GR (E) DECK OVER TDACK(1b GSF) ~~y BUILDING B bA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 eu~ou ~ ~ u~ e0 :w.si 1~ ~r~~~ `~ \ ~ __. '~. ~~rt w~n 0 x'42, BUILDBVG C U ``~~ _ o~~ `~'~_ N ~-_ h ~~~ ROPERt.yL -_ ~ \ ~` i ~ 1 1 1 1~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ e 3 ` ~~ 1 1 1 1 `~ 1 1 -(E) DECK OVER 1 ~~ SETBACK (68 GSF) ~ (L~ BUILDBJG AREA ~~ OVER SETBACK ` ~~ (I I I GSF; 99 GRFA) ~i 1 ~ ` 1 a ~ (I/)BUILDWC AREA n OVER SETBACK (269 GSF ~ Q~DECK OVER ~: SETBACK (2S GSF) ~ ~~ ( ~ ~ (E) DECK OVER ~~ -- SETBACK ~ ~~ (1461 GSF TOTAL FOR ` ~~ BUILDING C) ~ ` ~~ ~ ~ ~V~ \ N (E)BUILDMG ~ `~ AREA OVER ~~ SETBACK (3,218GSF~ ., ~~ ~~~ 7,8B40RFA TOTAL ~ FOR BUR.DDlG C) N \ \\ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ u~ ,~ ,,~~``` u*mn ~ ~ A~ ~ O A 1 \~.p~ ~ \ 1 inomn ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~" , ~~ u~ ~~- ix+ssn ~ u~ ,,~. \, ~. sww~* ~~sn lMfprt } ssn ® A~ T~j~ ~lL®®R ]PLAN- l3Ui~„~1N~S A, ~, ~ ~ ~.__ ~ ~.~ d 11~®~ ~~~ ®~~®~~1L ~LJ AOl1~ ~~ Shxt Na \~T// Vail, Colorado 1E]L]EVA7f~®N 810 ~ ~~o~~ Eax Wn~Ponnen L E H R E N t 1 r ~ ~ _ _ ~ 1 ~ 1 i R ~ t ~~ m 0masm ~1, ~ 1 ao~ ~ `~ ~ ~ , 0 ~.4 ~ 1 ~~ TT ~~ IRT1 I~~~ TT ~1 ARC t-~~ 1 e®~oou I 0 A3W 48 ~ etxamu II efuaou ~ e~rvoou II e~na0ou ~ em~mu I efuouu ~ ®uwx uu~s~ I ~ ~ awn I IH.aoou iwm~ s~suw I i ~ 'I I' ~~ J' ~~ o ~ I' ~ ~ ~'~,I I I~ I I I1 //'~~ f ~I 1) ~~ ~I ~~ ~ ~~ ol,~ '~' ~I'` {ywl I C ~ w II !~ ' 4 U io ~ I iil ~ ~ Q it i i~' I~i 1 i i al i 8 5 n Ili ,I ~`A~AG ~`IY I ~ Ida I $~ ~ 'I 1 ~ ' ~ l ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ l i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~/~ I ' i ~ '~~ / ~/ ~ ~ ~~, ~ 1 ~~ / ~~ ~ r so~-o• / ~ SETBAC / ~ ~ ~;; /~ ~'- ~ \ ~ \ ~ \ \\ ~_^~ .~ nw~wm ~ ~~ ~.,b~ -, .~~~ ~ryue~ ~:,~~ ~~ '-, e I B Q ~ 1 1 \ ~, 1 ~` 50~ O~~ 1 1 I 1 1 1 ~~ 1 GSI~ ~i I 1 1 ii fLDING ~ AVER i 1 CK(25GSF;\ 1~ '~ 11n DECK AREA \ i ^+ ER SETBACK ~ 11 p '~ GSF) ~~ ,~ $ ` \ ~ ;~ M ; ~ ~~ ~~ ~ \~ , 111 \~ 1 1 ' ~ 1, 1 ~ ~ ~, 1 1 1 1 1, ` ' ,, ~ ,, ~ ,1 ~, , 1 _ _ - ~ , 1, ~1, ~~~v~~~®~ ~z~7 ~a,l, Colorado 3/"~ t~~ &ecWertPonnen Z EuH R ~E N ~~0~~ r,~ -,~ ( T ~ ~ I A / i ~~c - _ rnn ncrv once rnmo 1 ~ I I I J - SOUTB EDGE OF EKISTINO INGRESS EASEMENT F- ' _ --- ( i i i i i i I i ~ ~ ( ~i~ f ~~ ,( I ~~ i f ) ,~ i I I ~~ i '' I I ~ BEILDING A i (E) ROOF OVER i SETBACK (506 GSF) i i i i ~ i ( i1 i ( ~ i i ~1 'I ®~~ I I ~L rJ ~I i i ~, i l~ '~'i uNrr 0 \ ~,1 1 1 1 ,1 1 i1 1 i 1 ~1 1 i OA3196f 11 p 1`, ~ 1 °~ (tQ DECKOYER 1 SETBACK (87 GSF) ([~BUII,DPIGAREA1 1 ~ S OVER SETBACK ` ~ (190 GSF; 121 GRFA) ~' ~, ~ ~, l ~\ BUILDING B ~~ ~ ~,~~ \ (NJ DECK OVER ~ °YHL ~ ~! a//N~ ~ \~ ///"' ~' ~ SETBACK(64 GSF) (I~ DECKS CANTILEVERED \ OVER PROPERTY LINE (34 GSP) <~ ~ ,. \ •\ _ %> (I~BUILDWG ~ }> ~ - ~ AREA OVER \ SECBACK (68 GSF) ~ 8 ~~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~y\ ~ ~ (E) DECK OVER SETBACK\ ` ~ ~ . \ \\ ~ (1467 GSFTOTAL POR ~ ~ BUILDING C) ,~ ~ \ \ ~~ ~ . / ~ ~ (E) BOII,DINO AREA ' uvuo gy~pp.. N' ]v OVERSETBACK 3 218GSF; 3 084 GRFA .~~ ~ V , , ~~ TOTAL FOR / ~ *,~ ~ ~BUILDINGC) fi~ ~~ ~ ~ e01~9.65 „~ .~%\\\ R'!)BUll.DRJG }( ~\~ AREA OVER \ ' `\ SETBACK (260 GSE) ~\ ~~ ~ '.~ (N)DECK OVER '~ V~ ~ .~~ETBACK (35 GSP) / \ A ~~\ ~ ' ~ BU[LDINGC ~ ~ • + ' ~ ~ l "------ -'- ~2 °" ~~s ~~ ~ ~ ~ (E) BUILDING AREA OVER PROP SETBACK (186 GSF; 139 GRF ~ ~ ~~ ~ (E) DECK OVBR BUILDQ~G C- CONT¢~U® ~ .=ETBACK (76 GSF) ~? 7'; 1 ~.0 ~ ~' \ ` _ uNrr ~ ~ ~ i ® ~~\ ~ ~; ~, ` (I~ BUII.DING AREA , ` i ~ ~~ OVER SETBACK (269 GS ` ` (1'~ DECK OVER ~ ~~ ~° ~ SETBACK (28 GSF) ~~ a; YYY ` ~ (E)DECKOVER ~~ r SETBACK ~ `~ ® ,. (1467 GSF TOTAL FDR `~ ~\ BUB,DING C) w~o~, BUII.DINGC _,, o u e ~_ N ~ `~ y _ ROPER.I,y _ ~~ \. ~ ` ~ \ ~_ ` 1 ~ ~ (E)BUILDING `~ OVER SETBACK (3,218GSF; 3,084 GRF\ ~~~~ ~~ TOTAL FOR BUB.DING C) ~ \`J , ~~ ~~ ~ ~. \ ~ N .~ \ ~ \~ \ \ ~~ \ /\ ~ \.\\ \~t A ~~ ~\ ~ ;: a? <', ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 1' __. ~~ __ ~~.®®It Ip~AN~ ~UI]LD~N~~ A, I$, ~ ~ ®°~°° ~J ~I~~VA'I'I®N t~~~0 ZEoFEN Vail, Colorado „~.a ~,~. ~i6n~~~~~ o ~, , ~~o~~ 1 1 ~~ 1 1 1 ----~~ ~~ 1 ~` ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 '~ l -------- 1 ~1 ~ x_741 _ `, 1 ~ i i i i i ~ SOUTH EDGE OF EKISTING MGRESS EASEMENT J - - - - - - i I I I I i ~ ~ ( f i i i i I i i ( ~ i I I I I I 1 I ( I I II -~ BUDDMCA i i i i ( ~~ s ~ ~ I ' 1` ~ ~1 1 c ~ ~\ \ \ (I~DECK \ / X ` CANTILEVERED tio~ ~. ~ ~ . \ OVER PROPERTY \ ~ \ LP1E (34 GSP) ~ ~ ~ \ _ '~ (N~BUDDPlGAREA ~ / ~ ~ ~ OVER SETBACK (3296 \ \GSF; 2972 GRFA TOTAL /~ ~ \ .\ `(''OR BUDDING C) ~4i-> ,SG~~ (I~ DECK AREA OVER \~~ SETBACK(IS50GSF ~ ~ t},4~ uem ~ QOTALFORBUDDINGC) \ ~~~ ~ DECK AREA OVER `~\~ ~ SETBACK (247 GSF) ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ OVER9ETBACK 265GSf~- A ~:~ ~ \ \ \ ~\ ~ , ~ ~,~ , ` c~ ;, \ '_-- _ TERRACE -_,__ ~ ~ '~--- \ aC ------_---- _ 9 ~ '------------ ~ ---_- ~ y ~ PRO=~,L~ BUQ.DING C- CONTAN® _~ t (N) DECK SETBACK (43 ~ 1 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~' - ~ ~ `, -`- > > ~ ~ i 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~~ 1 '~ ~ 1 ~ > > ~ ~ i1 ~ ~ 1 '~ 1 1 \ ~ 1 ~ 11 1 1 ~' ~, ~ ~~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 i `` ~~~ .. -~~,~...noo». ......__ . ~ `IONmv ~~,,.,~~ ®.~a~, ...wc~ou.aaaweri ~~ e~ 't ~, 1 1 ~ `` '~~ 1 ~ ' 1 1 1 \ 1 1 `` ` , 1 ~ ~ ` 1 ~ ` 1 1 1 '~ ~ ~(I~ROOFAREAOVER ' '~ SETBACK (176 GSA) ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ '~ ~ ` ~ `~ ~ (1~BUDDMG AREA ~ ~~ BUDDEJG B BUILDING C ~'_- L: - ~ ~~ ~~_ oQ __ ~~ ~~~ __ y '_- Rope `~ _ OVER SETBACK (219 ' GSF) 1 `~ ~, ~\ ~ ` +, \ (N)DECKAREA OVE\ ' ., SETBACK ~ ` (15SOGSFTOTALFOR ` BUILDMGC) ~ ' \ \ ~. . \ ~ ([~ BUDDING ARE\ OVER SETBACK (3296\ V GSF; 2972 GRFA TOTAL ~' '- A FOR BUILDING C) o ~ \ \, ~~~ \ ~\A~OA i \ \ ~~ ~By1 B ~~' A~lppp~~' \~` ~ / t,l ~~ ud~r %~ ti ~. ®/ ~,,~ \ ~~ ~, .\ C Vail, Colorado 3~~ Y~ E.,~~ea,P.~~ ~p , a A E,.N ~~,~~ I ~ J _ SOUTH EDGE OF EXISTING INGRESS EASEMENT i i ~ ~ i i I i ------------------------ ( ---~ i i I i ~ ( i r i ~ i ~ i ~ I i i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , I ~ ~_ 7____ ______ ______ _____ ___ _____ ______ _ ______ I ii ~ i ( ~ i ~ ~ ~1 1 1 I" ' ~ ~~ ~~ \ ~~~~ j~ \0 l \ ~ i '~ ' (Tl) ROOFAREA~ \~ ' OVER PROPERTY ~~ \ ~ / LINE (SI GSF) ~ ~~ ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ \ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ti r ' ,,,~~~~ (NJ ROOP AREA OVER V `, ~~~SETBACK(3210 GSF :TOTAL FOR BUB.DING C) `\ ~\ \` ~~ \~ (I~ ROOF AREA OVER ~ SETBACK (290 GSF) ~ ~~ \~ \~~ ~~ ~~, ~~~ ,' '` BUII,DINGC ~ ~~\` --"- ~ TERRACE • U ~ ~ o ~ -_______--- _~ \ _ NF. ___-______ ~ _ y -~_ ~ PR0-7.i, INE_ L BUQ.DING C- COMINUI~ ~ _ . _ l - - j ----- i i I ----~ BUILDING B i `, 1 1 1 ~ L J ~a^ 1 ~~ ~"'i ~~~~o~ ~1 . _ .I ,~~.,m~ 1 ~ .,.,.~v~,~,~~ ~~ ~ `, oo, ~,~,~n~ ~ ~~ F ~ Q ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ e 1 1 ~ 1 - ,, ~ ~_" t '> ~ \ 1 \ ;^. ~ 1 `, 1 1 ` ~' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~` ~ \\ ~` 1 1. , 1 1 ,~, ~i \ (N) ROOF AREA OVER ~ SETBACK (215 GSF) ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i it, , ~~ ~ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ \ \ `~ 'rexwce ~ ~ \ `~ / /'[\ ([~ ROOF AREA OVE\ \~ ~~/ SETBACK (3210 GSF \ TOTAL FOR BUILDING C) \ BUILDING C \ `\ ~ ~A BOA ~~ \~R~a~ \ ~\ ~ il` - ,,~ '~, ~,~t /' _ ~`, o -- N (.~ _ '-__ Rop\L -_ ~' ~ ~/, . \ \ ~\ 3/3T= Y-0" ~A\ Vail, Colorado EauWesiPv~nen Zo H R E N d u~C~~ I~I ~ ~~ ~' ~ I al a II a ~ 0 a, I I ~_I I~ I /III I ~I ~~ ~~ II ~I w U I ~~ ~ I I i' ' I ~~ ~ II ' I i OQ Si-0n of p ~ AG ~I I, $I I I I ~ 'I l ~ ~ '~ I~I',, I ~ ~~, l ~ ~ l / ~I J I / f zo~-o^ I~ J / ~ SEIBAC i~~ ~~ ~ ' i ;~ .\ ,\ ,\ ,\ -~ .~ ~~ ,~~.,~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ .~~.,~a~ nu~ ~'°`°~ _~. ~~ A 6 Q 1 1 1 ~\ '\ ~ ROOF OVER ` EfBACK(llSGSF) ~ ~ 50 A„ i \ ~ I (I~ ROOF OVER ~i ~SEIBACK (72 GSF) ~ i i «o ~~ 1 ;~ ,N '~, 1 '~, ~~, ---,- '~, I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1~ i I~ ~9 iO ~~ i~ i \ ~O ~i~ i~ ~0 i i~ ~$ `~ ~ ~~ ~ ' ~ .~ ~ ~ , \ ' ~ ~, 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~, ~`, ~J Vail, Colorado 3J32'b 1'-0" m~ Wm4a ~' 'k.. Ea.~Wrn Puwen Zo^ H.R EyN LL 110 JS~ 1 J ~' _ BLDG B PROPOSED ELEVATION r~a~~mr.Nno~ _ I~,L't ' LL ~ ~~~~' yy 9 ,. 0~ '~L°` ~ " r _. ,~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~~ , ~ , ~, I Pmc. ~7 .: "~ I ~ :.. ~ R~' e ~ Y - i 4 ~' tr~Y-~~ I ~4 € T-~ i' ta. 3g„~~ r~ Y r t ~ s, ~,. . ~ - . ,..r..r., 0-- mom ~ .~~ ~ __ . _.... .4. .r a . r ~ a'°°" 0~~ I (~ IBLDG AlB EXISTA7G ELEVATION ~ 5 LBLDG A/D PROPoSED ELEVATION f I BLDG AIB PRI OPOSED ELEVATION ca. ta~na f ~ ~ Sbeet Nu ~~~~ ~~~~, ~~~~~~~~J~~ ~XT~IZI®I~ ~I~~v~TI®~~- ~j.JIILDlf~1~ ~ ~ I$ Vail Colorado 3~~'°''°' ~ ~~o~~. 1 Bear dFs Pumcn Z EraR E N ._ ~~., - .. -" :,_ ,~ I .. ---- .~ .~ '. i _ a..~ ~ 1119 Ef I .. ~~a,, _ . ; _.l _ _ . _ _ ~~nm _ ` < t. ~ _, ^. (BLOC c elasrwc ELEVAnoN ' I II III I nn III ~ ,ill IIII ~ _ I ~, I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I II I ~ ffi - - - H I _ .' ~_ .. .,}. ._,., _, ~ _ , ~. ._. _.. ul I II I I I I I I u ._ ln. my - - - I . - __ ~ I ~ - III of I - - - -- I I I I ~ - __, - - ~~a~~. ~ev~ aewcc 3 BLDGCNEW ELEVATION "!-S `~ `~ _- -_._-. - = i _- - n - II I II I I n _ _ _... _.._.. ~v¢,.awcc I I II I I II q II _ I~ II _ I I I I I - _ I III II I I II mIl ' I I 114' II ~wse _.._. __. ~ .._. ~ - _ II _ _ I£/FL6BI000 0 _.._. I ...__ I ~ •~ ~. 5' III', 1 ` L I 11 I'!I I I I I 11 a I'o1 __ I I ~ 11 II IINI I II 111 tlll li fi ~ III II II II II II IIII -J - _ - ~ .. - 0uv~.se~occ IN- ~- I I ~i ~ III I I- I I ~ I i I IPI I III I I II I _ ttl6m' _ I IF'FLa BIDGC __._. ._.__.._ __ ..III IEYd1alnG0 ._...___._._. _ It~_-_..--__._...-..._..._..__ _._.__.._...._.._.___.._._.._. .._..._..___. _ BLDGCNEW ELEVATION ®~ m~am f ':,, Vail, Colorado 3~~"°''~ E~~~1,1~~~~ ~,~~ ZEE WREN 4 BLDGCNEW ELEVATION ~. purr ~. riu, , ,, . .. TO ROOF. BLDG,P .. .. "' 8211.1 ., ~ ~ . .. y ., .,. _.... ~ ...~ _ t ..._._.. ~__.~. ( ' ~~ ~ - ... .. ; .- J ~ ' - .. K t 1~ e; . ~. ~ ' . . .LEVELS BLDGF ~ .. , ... " ...,.~ _ ,. ILYP1SBInOn F .._. _.. ` 8202.51 P"`3""`` y. .. -^ -.ice-,-~ ; {; _ ,,:. _ ~ _. I I L ~ !: N r ~ n yLEVEL4BLDCF ` ~ ~ C .. .~_ _iy~'a' 8197.02 t y i ~ 1 .~'.: '- j ~) _ ~ ~ ~ 1 . v.' ' ~ into _. .,.... .. . S. ' CEVBL}BLDGF_.. _..,__. ..._.f .L.i .::~.~.__.~. -i .. !. _ ,: ~ ._ r , . ... e~etoi ,..: ~, LEYELL BLDGP ... .. . . . ;34 ilsi city ...:`v~k ...... .. .. ..... .. .. _. ':L.~,t.~ .,:`f, :'., . ~' ~ 18v0.LNnGP -stn Ft .. .... p e1ne I y BLDG DIFiF EIOSMGELEVAflON BUB.DMG F P~ BUILDING E BUILDING D ~ ~ (BLDG DlFJF NEWELHVATION BUB.DBVG D m: acmam Vail, Colorado sl3r= r~ E.x,WenPvme a , , ~~,~~ ZE WREN BUB.DINC E I ~ BLDG DIFJF NEW ELEVA770N BUB.DING F BLDG F EXISTING ELEVATION m. maga ~~®~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ EXTERN®R E~EVAT~®NS- Ei~~~~N~S ~, E, ~ E r ~~ ~ ~.: Vail Colorado 3~3~ Y.~ ~ ~~o~~ Ea~n Wen Ponnen Z E N R E N BLDG F NEW ELEVATION z BLDG D NEW ELEVA770N a ------ ------ ------------------------ .u....~; ~--~ _ .2 ~~ .~ ~f BEYOND ~/ X25 mm~un ~~ nauma ~__ - ___ i ~vw~un ``r___ T __ ' ~ ___ ~rJ~ ~Nt$TD NEW FOURTH FLOOR UMT ' GOLD PEAL` m / 4g~ / _. __ - - ------------~_~_ -~ - _~~ ~~~~_~~w~-~----~- -- ~w-_ _____ _ _ ~ ~~__~=-~----- ,o~~, m~ f ~-~- __ - ~ EKISTA'G J ~ ~ i i~~ ~ I I~ 1 a I, ~ ,~~ __ _ ~ ,~~_ ~ ' ,,\ GORE CREEK -, - ---- -.--_ -.... - -- - ~'~$ _ ~ 11 Revon~o i' _.i ,' __ mss . .~ ,,- m.wure ___ .__. ~~ ~ . J ""'."' __ _ ____ - ---- ro~~M~. -- ~ ~~ ~ ~ -- -- -- ~~-- - --- -- a __L,i - ---- -----~ ___ 'I u ~ ~ i ~ '------ ~,~P~ ------- -_- - --- --- - - -_ U _ - -, ~T ~ ,~ ~SECHON THROUGH BUILDMGF NEW FOURTHFLOORS1NIf (yLj^(~~~~J I~ ~'"~'ro~~ i ~~ is IIII / i~ ~____~ __._ ~ - xew ~ rawor.mmc A ,~® ---- -~._. , ~I ~,~~. ~,.~~. r _~~ _ __ a 0 a -- " ISECEIGN TNRWGH 9UfLDRIGG ~, ~$m ~ ~ Shcet Na Vail Colorado Eam Wea~Pannrn Z E,H R E N a 0 Nh~®~ SAIL c®~®~~~U~~ ~AIDLy c®lL®]R~~9® P~~~c ENEF~'~~ 1~ 1 ~ ~ `~~. ;a _~~ ~~ 2 E H R E N Easswe~~Parmcrs r..o essocuas, i.c ~\ ~\ ~\ i d O ~I I I 1I I i / // /// I / /// ~I ~I i I t 1 ~' \ i ly 1 I 1~ ly ~n IF 1~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ \g ~ 1 IQ I ~h ', ~ 'M im i~ i $ i \a ~, \9 II11 1 1 1 , , \ ~ 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 \ 1 1 1 ` 1 1 ~I 1 1 o = 9 Z Vail, Colorado FL®®R I'LAN~ BUII,DIN~~ D, E, ~ F ELEVA~°I®N ~~1~ 3/32"=1'-0" ~ ~.,.~ Eeni Wens Pumem 7~,E~;;mgrE ~, 6 SS~O~~ i /i -. \ \ 0 i I I 1 I I ~ SOUTH EDGE OF EXISTING INGRESS EASEMENT J-------------_ _. _... _.. r'_ ~ 3 I I N~ I I I I I I ~___I~________________________ r I f___.___l r_ ______________________ __ ~ I ~ i I I I t~ ~ i I i ~ I ________ J L J c ~ I JL__r_ _______ ______ ______ _ ______ ______ it I I ~ f --~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ I I I ~_ rJ i ~I I ~ ~ I i i ,~~ i o -- ------ ----- ---- I I I I BUILDING A i' 1 v \ BIDLDING C '_ _ L! h ~~ PRO` p1~, ~ HNLDIIJG C• CONi~'UHD '_ .1 ` 11 et ~ \ 1 11 1 1 111 1 1 _ ll t _1~ ~ ~1 1 1 1111111 1 1111111 1 1 1 11 1 ` 11 11\ ~ 1 111 11111 1` 111111 1 1 11 1 1 ` 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 ~ 1 1 1 l 1 1 h 1 a 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~_'. II '~~ 2 -v 11 1 -! j;. unrc ~ `~ ,• ^ ~ ~C/ BUILDWG B 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 11, 1 11 i 1 11111 i~ ~ S~~ ',~;~„~y ~wna~rvv.nenne~emnooa 1 ~ \ ~ tI \\ \A~ ~I oA ~ \~ ~ ~~ 6 II fail, Colorado FLOOR PLAN EUILDING~ A, E, E~ ~ ELEVATION ~~~0 3/32"= 1'-B" ulnn~r ~ ~ 0 ~ ~/, .~- w BUILDING C 1 ~ ~ m, e,~A,sa i e ~ Sheet Na ; Eun WeeePmamn I E H F E N c>~w.~~~e ~~_ ~~a'~~ ~~ E D e~ 1 ~ I I I I SOUTH EDGE OF EXISTING INGRESS EASEMENT J - - - - - r- I - - - - - - ~ - ' - - - - - - t I I I I 1 r--- I 1 ' "'J i , I 1 i V I 1 I ~ I ~ L____~ r___i . I f_______l f_ ___________________ __________ ~ I I 1 I I ~ 1 I I I ~I ________ J L _ 1 ~ I 1 ______ ______ _ ______ -- _~ ______ _ ______ ______ 1 _____ _____ ~ I I 1 I I i I TERRACE ~-i I I 11 i 1 I I 1 I I I I j i ~ I ~ 1 I ~-i I I ~ i I 1 i I _ L____ ______ _ ______ ____ ___ _____ ______ _ ______ _____ ___ __ I ___ ______ _____ ___ 1_ I I 1 1 BUILDINGA BUH.DINGA 'y--+-~--~--~------ BUII.DD7G B BUILDINGC ~n 0 11 ~~ ,` Op `l~ \ ~~~ BUILDING C -~ / IINR ~' ~/ ~ ,;,. ,~ ;~ mmr Vail, Colorado L®®R RI~AN~ l3UI~,DIIVG~ A, ~, d~ C L~VATI®N ~~3~ Cm 1'-0' 1 1 ~ 1 11 1 \ 111 1 1 1 `` 1 1 ~~ 11~ J 1 1 - 1111111 1, 11111 1 1 1 1 1 111 , 11 1 11 , 1 11 ~~', .rclrM~ ear~emamv 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 ~ 11 1 1 111 \ff\'~~~ 111 1, ~ 1 111 ~+ 1 1 1 1 ~~ 1 1 11 1 ~ 111 ~ 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 111 1 1 11 1 1 ~ lY 1 f ~\1 1~~ 111 ~` 1 1 1 1 ~> 1 11// i ~^I (/ 1 , ~ \' ~ \ ,`~ ~~~ ,, ,, , r m~ ~a~ ~ s>~ xa ; Em Weal hrolen ZEo eR~E^N dlf~0~6 ~~ ~ li i `~' 1 1 1 1 ', fVIEiVIORA~lDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Conference Center Advisory Committee DATE: December 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Update on the Vail Conference Center Planner: Russell Forrest PURPOSE The Town Council is requested to provide direction on the arcthectural direction for the conference center.. Three alternative approaches have been developed and discussed with the community over the last 4 weeks. Other items the Committee would like to review with the Town Council include: Review progress to date on the site planning and circulation for the facility, and Receive an update on the Master Plan for the facility 2. BACKGROUND The Vail Town Council on April 20, 2004, authorized a series of next steps which included interviewing owner's representative firms for the Conference Center. On April 29, 2004, the Committee met to interview five owner's representative firms. On May 18, 2004, the Vail Town Council authorized the Town Manager to execute a contract with ARC to be the Town's owner's representative and funding for the first phase of this contract or $8,510. The Vail Town Council also authorized the Committee to negotiate with both Piper Jaffray and Kirtpatrick Pettis to be the Town's investment banker on this project. On June 1, 2004,.the Vail Town Council voted to approve the following requests from the Committee: o Authorization to engage Piper Jaffray as the Town's investment banker for the Conference Center. Authorization to issue an RFO for design team assistance on the Conference Center. Request to move forward with a negotiated guaranteed maximum price (GMP) process for engaging a design team and a general contractor (as opposed to a design build process). This essentially means that both the architect and general contractor will work for the Town of Vail Request for the Vail Town Council to approve the next phase of an owner's representative contract. The preconstruction phase of the contract would cost up to $155,774. However, the Committee is only requesting $93,212 (includes fees and reimbursables) to fund this function until a decision is made by the _ ~ Vail Town Council to issue bonds which is anticipated in the November/December 2004 time frame. ~~ On June 15, 2004, the Vail Town Council reviewed and approved the following next steps: o Approval of the proposed process for engaging the public in the design team selection process. Selection criteria for request for proposals. Consideration of proposed process givens. o Review of updated project budget and interrelated parking costs, and m Consideration and review of the major points of the proposed scope of service request for proposals for design services (to be given to the top 3-4 teams selected in the qualification competition). On July 6t", the Vail Town Council reviewed and approved the following next steps: Review the recommendation from the Committee on short-listing the design team candidates and to issue the Request for Proposals (RFP) to the six recommended design teams. Review and approve suggested changes to the design team selection process from the Committee. Request permission to issue a RFP for a surveyor to survey the Lionshead parking structure site and surrounding area. On July 20, 2004 the Vail Town Council unanimously approved the following: o.: A contract for design services with Fentress Bradburn. ~' Approval of next steps for master planning the Lionshead Parking Structure/conference center site. On September 21, 2004 the Town Council, Conference Center Advisory Committee, Design Review Board, and Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed 5 alternatives site plans. In addition, the public reviewed the same alternatives on September 22"d. The near unanimous opinion from the various groups that reviewed the site plans was that alternative 3 is the preferred choice. Staff is now adjusting what the Design Team will be working on over the next two week, to further refine alternative three and test this alternative versus developing other; alternatives further. On October 19t" the Vail Town Council met and reviewed an update on architectural images for the conference center and authorized the Committee to move forward with public discussions regarding the alternative styles. The Committee met on October 21St and reviewed the qualification submitted by six general contractors. After reviewing the qualifications, the committee recommended to the Vail Town Council that three general contractors receive requests for proposals. Those general contractors include: _ ~ Hansel Phelps Construction Hunt Construction Grou/Hyder Construction M.A Mortenson Company On November 2, 2004, the Town Council approved a motion to forward the above mentioned contractors requests for proposals. 3. ®ESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS A. Architectural Style ~4lternatives The design team of Fentress Bradburn developed three alternative architectural approaches. The images in attachment A are notthe elevations of the proposed conference center but rather provide alternative visions or inspirations that could be considered for the conference center. The three styles include: 1) Bavarian/Traditional Vail style 2) Contemporary 3) Natural/Environmentally inspired style Also included in attachment A are possible site and floor plans for the conference center. A critical site planning issue has been whether Vail International is willing work with the Town to create access off of the Frontage Road and eliminate the current access to Vail International from East Lionshead Circle (between Dobson and the Parking Structure). In addition, the Committee explored the idea of cooperating with Vail International on loading and delivery access for both Vail International and the Conference Center. After several meetings with Vail International, the Association expressed some interest in continuing to work with the Town on providing access off of the Frontage Road. However.; the Association has expressed no interest in further working on a joint loading and delivery solution. Also the time frame for coming to a decision on alternative access with Vail International could be longer than could be afforded in the design process. Public Input The design team and staff have provided numerous opportunities for the public to comment on the three possible architectural styles. These opportunities are summarized in attachment B. They included public meetings, meetings with lodge owners, merchants, adjacent property owners, home owner association meetings, an open house on election day, and posting the information on the Town's web site. Attachment C summarizes the public comments received to date on the three architectural images. While there was a wide variety of specific comments; there were generally three themes from these comments: 1. Comments about the specific architectural features and design- (i.e. ability to have a visual connection to the mountains). 2. Comments that any style needed to address how the structure would be integrated with adjacent uses, (particularly the Lionshead parking structure). 3. Comments about the preferred alternative style images. There were comments that supported the Traditional Vail Vernacular Vision and the Natural Vision. There were very few comments that supported the modern-meets-organic style. Comments seemed to: reflect a need to continue a Bavarian image as seen in Vail Village and the new Lionshead, or given the use, diversity of architectural styles around the site, and a desire to have a civic building that stands out to opt for the natural vision. It should be noted that many that favored the natural vision still believed the roof form needed further development and refinement. Cost Comparison The Conference Center Committee asked that the alternative design visions be evaluated based on cost. Attachment D summarizes the costs the Committee reviewed on November 18th. The natural vision (Image 3) is approximately $800,000 more than the Traditional Bavarian vision (image 1). This is primarily due to a more expensive roof structure on the natural vision. Committee Recommendation The Conference Center Advisory Committee reviewed the public input • associated with the th~~ee design alternatives-on November 18th. After ~ •_ ~- ~--, reviewing the public input and the associated costs with each design option the Committee would like to forward a recommendation for the "Architectrual Vision Inspired by Nature." The Committee felt that this would create an outstanding archtectural structure. The materials as envisioned by the design team would utilize "mountain"materials such as heavy stone and timbers. The roof element would be more iconic but is intended to reflect the form of the surrounding mountains. It should also be noted that one member of the committee, although not present on November 18th, preferred the Traditional Vail Vernacular look. The committee is further recommending that the entire loading and delivery function occur under the conference center rather than sharing maneuverings space on Vail International property. In addition, the Committee is recommending that vehicular access for Vail International be maintained in its current location for now. However, with the current site plan it may be possible to provide Vail International access off of the Frontage Road using the conference center access point if the Association would like to move the access. This would improve pedestrian circulation on East Lionshead Circle and reduce vehicular conflicts between Dobson and the Conference Center. B. Master Plan The Committee and the design team are also working on a Master Plan. The proposed purpose and goals of the Master Plan are summarized in attachment E. The overall purpose of the Master Plan is to ensure the conference center is successfully integrated with the Lionshead Parking structure and surrounding vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The Plan is also intended to assist in future planning for a transit facility and additional public parking for Lionshead. The technical issues related to a transit facility and parking are still being finalized. A critical staff meeting with transportation consultants is planned for December 3rd to review some of the technical considerations for locating transit functions on the Lionshead structure or a redeveloped structure. Also staff is working with the design team to determine the optimal amount of parking spaces that can be located under the conference center and the related costs associated with conference center parking and additional public parking. Your input on the purpose and goals of the Master Plan would be very much appreciated. C. Next Steps Proposed next steps include: December 14 2004 at 3:00: Conference Center Advisory Committee December 21, 2004Town Couricil update on design and review of draft Master Plan December 22, 2004: Conference Center Advisory Committee January 19, 2005: General Contractor Interviews o February 1, 2005: Council " Decision °on -moving 'forward vuith k~ond sales. Attachment A Alternative Architectural Images Attachment B Public Input Opportunities Attachment C Public Input Attachment D Cost comparison summary of alternatives Attachment E Master Plan Summary 5 a ~~ ~ ~o 6 .~~~~.~~ ~~.~~~ ~~ ARC H I T E CTS LTD. Architecture ~ Interiors ~ Planning 12 01X2004 ~. - _ _ _ --- LOBBY JUNI BALLROOM MAIN BA OOM PRE ' FUNC TERRACE FRONTAGE ROAD DRO OFF ___ PARKING :: _I ~ _-._~I i _ I PARKING I LOADING DOCK PARKING - - ~ -~ '. .* PARK] MEETING PANNING ROOMS BREAKOUT MEETING ROOMS NORT~I / SOUTC-I BUILDING SEOTION A®®ITI®NAL PARKING FflONTAGE ROAU n LOBBY DROP OFF r,'__. PARKING ~~.PaRKMG JUNI BALLROOM i,. PARKING -i ~~ MAIN BALLROI LOADING DOCH PARKING PARKING _ _~ 12~01~2004 ~~~. ARCHITECTS LTD. Architecture ~ Interiors ~ Planning PRE- FUNC TERRACE BREAKOUT MEETING ROOMS N®RTI-I l S®l~Tl~ SDILDING SEGTI®N t~~~,~ ~~~o~ ~~~ ~°~~~~ee~ Public Outreach Activities 'own ®$ Vail 02 DEC 04 ' Conference Center Date Time Location Description ~ Approximate` Ex osure 21-Sep-04 6:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Counci! presentation of master plan update Town Council: 30 Chambers 22-Sep-04 4:OOpm 5:15pm ToV Library Public Open house to review Master Plan options 5 22-Sep-04 5:15pm 6:30pm ToV Library Presentation of Master Plan options to public 15 5-Oct-04 6:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Council Update presented to Town Council 25 Chambers , 12-Oct-04 5:15pm 6:30pm ToV Library Public open house & update 12 19-Oct-04 6:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Council Chambers Design styles presented to Town Council f 30 20-Oct-04 2:30pm 4:OOpm ToV Library Adjacent property owner meetings -update on process and review of building 60 concepts 20-Oct-04 4:OOpm 7:OOpm ToV Library Public update meeting -update on process & review of building concepts 30 26-Oct-04 12:OOpm 2:OOpm ToV eomm Design presentation to local architects 10 26-Oct-04 2:OOpm 3:OOpm Bart & Yeti's Design presentation to Lionshead merchants 8 26-Oct-04 3:OOpm 4:OOpm Manor Vail Design presentation to hoteliers 11 27-Oct-04 5:OOpm 6:30pm ToV Town Council Public update meeting -update on process & review of updated building . 5 Chambers concepts 2-Nov-04 7:OOam 7:OOpm Donovan Pavillion Election Day "Open House" 1000 + 4-Nov-04 5:OOpm 6:OOpm ToV Library Public update meeting -update on process & review of updated building 5 concepts TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Pale 1 Of 1 ©2004 All Rights Reserved By p:\current projects\..:\C~onference Center Meeting..Schedules.xls Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. ~ttachrr~~nt C _ _ Publuc Input 9 Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By W C N Question /Comment ~ t6 r N ~ _ N N « N = U m m ~ m c ~ cn ~ ~ t~ ~ m E E ~ ~ c ~ m c o v m E o N ~ ' c O ~ N .n a' g ~ o ~ ~ m E Q E ~ j ~j U m ~ U c 0 w d m O U Z, 0 m p 2 o a Y $ ~ c ~ ~ Z t C m (n c pl O` ~ > ~ U ~ c~ 1 Would Tike additional development on the roof structure and X covering ideas and options for the "natural" design style X 2 Concern with the natural style not effectively tying the villages X X together X 3 Need to engage more public comment and input X X X X 4 Prefer the traditional and natural styles io the modern style X X X X 5 Need to confirm the proposed options can be built within the X current budget X 6 The natural design is spectacular and will promote marketing of X the facility X 7 Vail is an icon in and of itself X X 8 It would be great to create our own Sydney Opera House - an ' X X iconic image for the town, rf we can afford it It would be easy to follow the traditional style, but it would be a 9 X mistake X 10 Prefer the modern or natural styles X X X 11 Need something spectacular X X 12 Prefer the natural, modern, then traditional X X X X 13 The design team was chosen to develop a style along the lines of X the natural style X 14 The natural style is not a Vail statement X X 15 Prefer the traditional style, but prefer the sketches to the X rendering X 16 Don't compromise the building to meet the budget -wait till we have enough money to build without skimping X X X 17 ee sure to incorporate comments from holiday crowd X X X 18 The natural option has potential, but is scary ~ X X 19 The traditional option works best with the core site and ties the villages together i X X 20 The natural option is fascinating but risky X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANO MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... PBgO 1 O( 24 0.2004 All Rghls Reserved By p:lwrtanl prpjedsl..Wr'hileclural Design Slyle Commenls.xls ArchilecNral Reswrce ConsullanB, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up By (p N C N N Question /Comment N f ~ N ~ _ N ~ ~ .-. = - U ~+ (n (D Q ~' U N .~`. U U O V1 V O E N E E N N j m C O U rD ~ O N ~ C O ~_ N ._ ~ d ~ 0 ~ 9. E _ m m~ v C ~ ~ U 3 W a ~ ~ U ~ a> o = a 0 a Y 0 ~ ~ m ~ ~ z d U C N ~' ~ ~ N o d o N ~ Q ~ ~ ~ O o Q a 21 Don't mimic the "mostly roof' aspect of Dobson Arena X X 22 Needs to feel elegant and maintain the feel of Vail X X X 23 The natural option has wild potential X X 24 Concerned with the longevity of the natural option X X 25 Lean toward the traditional option X X 26 The design needs to be timeless X X 27 Concerned with the natural design fitting into the center of town X X X 28 Concerned with the scale of the traditional option X X X 2g The natural option may accommodate the scale of the building X X X better 30 Concerned that the options may impose architectural restrictions X X on future development 31 Ensure all options allow for daylighting X X X Whatever is done will be a "statement" so I don't really understand how a desire to make a statement militates toward 32 one concept or the other; the issue is whether the statement that X X X X will be made is harmonious with other elements of the town or not. A building that introduces a dramatically new architecture is likely to be a mistake. The natural environment of the town includes and in large part is 33 dominated by the prevailing architectural theme which is X X ovenvhelmingty Alpine/Bavarian and will be more so once the Core Area project is completed. 34 The natural drawing was sufficiently unclear that a variety of i ti f ithi th l d s X X p on. it w n e genera e cr designs can The "Contemporary" approach was cleverly eliminated by a 35 design that harmonized with the one part of the parking structure X X that everyone agreed had to go! The last variable is topography so it looks like your challenge is to provide elevations that track the mountains but in a structure that 36 ' X X t have too has Alpine/Bavarian features so taxpayers like me don many problems. 37 Please register my vote in favor of the Bavarian mountain style X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND IAUITIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page Z O( 24 ®20Da All Rights Reserved By p:kvneni projeclsl..WrchilecWral Design Style CommenLS.als Nchilectural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town Of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center P Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought up By N Question /Comment ~ ~ ~ O - ~ ~ ~' ~ _ • ~ m ~ i" ~ ~ >. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °c' a~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ _ c 'o U m E o y ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ n d 4 ~ ~ Q E t_j ~ uN, ~ a o Z" o o `o ~ Z ~ U ~' ~ rn o ° H N = d ~ ~ ~ in •~ a a ¢ ._ j c~ o a Please remember that the 70's contemporary architecture in 38 Lionshead did not age well. This is and will always be a ski X X resort. Your designs should reflect this without getting silly. Please do not go for the Contemporary styling. Most of Lionshead 39 design was done in what was "contemporary" in the 70's; now it X X just looks dated. 40 As an owner in the Lodge at Lionshead, I'd love to see the " " X X X - Bavarian; but the topography--inspired sounds interesiir;g _ - I very much like the Bavaria/Mountain style best out of the 3 41 styles presented. This style has been used so effectively in many X ski areas. It looks elegant and beautiful in the mountain X surroundings. 42 I really dislike the contemporary style. I believe it would be an X eye sore and be very much out of place X The only design of the three that stays in keeping with the feel of the Vail community is the Bavarian design. The others, while 43 X X X creative, would eventually, and, in the not too distant future take a X decidedly dated appearance and become a blight on the community. Ensure to incorporate daylighting as it has been shown to 44 X X enhance learning X If the stacking option C is chosen, the height of the structure 45 should not be a concern as that scale is not continuous along that X X road 46 Account for the possibility of expansion X X X 47 The Conference Center should look like a conference center - it ' X X X doesn t need to fit into the historical precedent 48 Consider moving the additional meeting rooms back to the S. to X some extent in stacking diagram C X 49 The amount of mass at the frontage road in stacking diagram C i a little concerning X X 50 Confirm the "natural" design option works with the budget X X X The thinking process behind the "natural' design is correct but the 51 design needs to be refined, though it should be noted there is no X lack of confidence that the design team will come up with X "appropriate architecture," 52 There is no honesty in making the convention center look like another row of shops in town X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 3 O( Z4 ®200a FJI Righls Reservetl By p:\curtenl projects\...Wrrhileclutal Design Style Convnenls.xls ~rchlleclural Resource Consuitanis, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By ( N C N Question /Comment ~ p .~. N O N N "' `~ ~ Q7 = U T (n f0 N .~'. cn N ~ u> U ~~ r~ C N E 19 N a 01 j m .V C o U m ~ ~ o N u`, _ d C 3 O - ~ ._ ~ a' o ~ ~ " ~ ~ Q~ E U N o ~ m ~ a p ~, o 0 Y 0 o ~ Z m o ~ U a~ U ~ a~ o 3 o 0 N 2 a ~ ~ F- ~ ~ o_ F - ¢ ~ ¢ ~ c9 o a 53 The modern option does not fit in this area X X X A roof similar to DIA may work with the natural option- it is proven 54 X X to work and is budgetable Conferences are supposed to be fun and'need an exciting 55' X X building like the "natural" design to enhance the experience 56 Concern with limited expansion opportunities with the roof of the X X X "natural" design Snow cornices are only in Vail a few months each year -consider 57 X X additional "greener" roof options 58 Be sure to study reflectivity, etc if a roof as proposed in the X X "natural" option is decided upon 59 Any option chosen needs to be grounded in native materials X ~ X . The natural design is the most exciting and stimulating, but 60 clarification on the roof structure, especially during the summer X X months, is needed. 61 Don't let the Donovan Park history make us timid in approaching X X this design 62 It is okay if the building doesn't tie in exactly to Lionshead X X X 63 The "natural" design needs to be refined, but is the closet to the d i i d i i X X con es re c mage. 64 What is the cost difference between the different options? X X X 65 Believe meeting planners will desire the "traditional Vail" look X X 66 Design options should be ranked as follows: natural, traditional, X X X X modern. ' 67 The natural design will get people talking and make the building X X marketable 68 If need be, we can live with the traditional option, but it is not X X moving. TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... P09e 4 D( 24 ®2WC All RgMS Reservetl By o:kurtenl Pr0letlsl..Wnlileclural Design Style CommenLS.rls ~ Nchileclural Resource DonsulL3n15, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder IVleeting Comments Comment Category Brought up By N G Question /Comment ~ N N _ y ° ~ . N w N y U T rn ~ ~ m ~ O ~ rn U N ~ L a E E C d E E !fl iv :° c ~ = m ~ U c o w m E o N d N C 3 ~ ~ Y n a= ~ j ~ ° m 7 m a E ~ U (j O ~ N ~ v C o 0_ ~ ~ v T N ~ O = O o O ~ d ~ ~ Z a> iv ~ m ~ 'y o a` H v _ :o a v ~ ~ ~ ~ p ¢ a= 69 Should consider tying into the new Lionshead architecture X X 70 Need to ensure natural light is brought to the ballrooms X X X Windows in banquets are typically a benefit, while windows in 71 X X X meeting rooms can be a distraction. 72 Ensure flexibility with natural light in the building X X X 73 The option of using the roof as an outdoor gathering area is a X large benefit of stacking diagram C X 74 The modern design is not what people picture when they come to X the mountains X 75 Need a design that won't become dated X X Curious as to how any of the designs tie into the existing 76 Li h d ki X X X ons ea par ng structure. 77 Concerned with how the natural design will look in the middle of town X X X Don't see how the natural design will ever work with the feel of 78 X Vail X 79 The traditional design is Vail's sense of place and what people X come here for. X 80 The traditional design will be easier to market in Vail. X X 81 The modern design is great, but has the possibility to become X dated ~. X 82 Is there a difference in usable/wasted space with any of the X X proposed options? X 83 The maximization of the amount of glass in the modern design X will help make the facility more marketable X TEAMWORH DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page S OT T4 ®200d All Rgftls Reserved By o:kurtenl oroiectsl...WChileeWral Deslon SNIe Commenls.rtls Arnhilxlural Resr~rre:n ~msiillanls. Inr.. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By N C N N Question /Comment ~ (p .~. N O _ N m . ~ ~ N = - U m m N >. m N w ~ V m ~ ~~ ~ ~ E l9 ~ y ~ m U c 'o U m E o N _ ~' N c O j N ._ ~ a c a o a E m j U ° ~ N ~ ~ o a ~ >. ° o = 0 a 0 ~ ~ F. ~ m Z C a~ ~ ~ in m ~ n. t- ~ , '> a ~ Q v ~ c7 C7 o ¢ a The views from the conference center should be sold, not the 84 X X views of the conference center. Dislike designing to match everything else -rank the options as 85 X X X X follows: modern, natural, traditional. 86 Like the possibility of the natural option, but need to see further X X development 87 Extensive amount of glass gives an urban feel and doesn't belong X X in Vail. 88 A large expanse of glass provides operational challenges. X X 89 The space and function of the interior is more important than the X X X image. 90 Need to ensure the kitchen is at the same level as the ballrooms X X 91 I love the natural look and the idea of a focal point with the X X illuminated cone If people want an alpine look from the highway then have an 92 alpine look on the north side and a more contemporary type look X X on the south side? 93 Concerned with heat loss issues associated with the extensive X X amounts of glass in the modern option 94 Would prefer a departure from 'Traditional Vail" X X X 95 We need to use this opportunity to make a statement X X 96 Like the concept behind the ntetural design, but the design needs t ~ f h d l X X eve opmen urt er 97 Cost difference between the~design styles should be considered X X X 98 If a signature building can be created within budget, that design X X should be pursued TEAMWORK ONI~E$ THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... ~ Pa JE F> ~~ ZQ ®200a NI Ryhls Reservatl 0y Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town Of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up By m - N c ~ Question /Comment ~ _ N = ~ _ o ~' y = U .~`. (n m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V N ~ ~ ~~ C ~ E N N v N 'O ' ro .U C = o (, m E E o y d ~ C 3 O ~ N ~ = o_ o ~ o ? ~ ¢ E my ~ o ~ N ~ c o a ~ ~ o = 0 a 0 ~ F" Z N ~ ~_ ~ ~ '~ O 4. ~ N ~ :0 Q U ~ ~ ~ ~ o ¢ a' It is time to start looking at something other than the traditional 99 Vail style X X 100 A new building style will create diversity and increase Vail's jdentity X X X 101 Traditional alpine architecture is what puts Vail on the map X X 102 Windows at ground level are inviting X X 103 Dislike the modern image X X 104 Consider incorporating new elements into the traditional architecture X X X 105 Keep in mind the traditional look that people expect from Vail X X 106 Focus on the function of the facility first and foremost X X 107 Concerned with possibility of wasted space in the natural design X X X 108 Focus on quality to ensure a timeless building X X The building needs to be able to adapt to the ever-changing 109 desires of the resort business and doesn't necessarily need to be X X timeless 110 Like the fact that the modern rendering looks like a conference center X X 111 Concern with the construction/appearance of the roof element of X X the natural design 112 Something "different" can work on this site X X X 113 Alpine feel is a part of Vait -consider the traditional approach with X some modern elements X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... P8[J2 7 Ot 24 02004 All Rigftls Reserve0 By p:lcunanl projeclsL..Wrlhileclural Desgn Sryle Commenls.xls Nchiteclural Razource Corwultanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By ( N C N Question /Comment ~ p _ w ° ~ _ N ~' ~ N _ ° f0 .~. ~ ~ ~ N .N. L N ° N E Q) ~ ~ dl C O U m E O N O C O ~ N S] ~ C C (0 ` - ~ ~ C ~ U W ~ U N d Y (0 v N o = io Q E 'a ° ~ ° O U N ~ C 3 d O T `o O S O a O ~ ~ c ~ c a~ ~ 'N o. -'o ¢ a ~ ~ ° o Q = a 114 Should focus the design more on traditional elements and less on X X modern ones 115 The building should work to connect the villages X X X 116 Believe the natural design can be built cost-effectively X X X 117 Should focus design efforts on the interior space X X 118 When broken up, interior space should be more square rather h l d X X narrow t an ong an 119 Consider the context of the adjacent structures such as the X X X parking structure 120 Concerned with how any of the designs tie into the parking X X X structure 12i Ensure natural light is incorporated in the interior spaces X X X 122 Account for sufficient floor loads: trucks, etc. X X . 123 Ceiling height of ballrooms should be 25 - 30' X Prefer option with meeting rooms on the roof with views and 124 d h i t d li X X X ncorpora e g t ay 125 Still need to consider amulti-use non flat floor option X X 126 Stacking diagrams C & D are the only feasible options X X X Concerned with possibility of putting meeting rooms at the outsid X X 127 face of the building at E. Lionshead circle -noise/distractions 128 Ensure designs allow for daylighting X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... PBgB H OF 24 ~ ®200a All Rights Reservetl By o:kunenl orgeclsl..Wchileclural Design Style Commen(s.~ls Archilactural Resource Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town Of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up ey c „ ~ Question /Comment ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~° ~, _ ~_' ~ m >. m c ~ >. N ~ w ~ aci E aci £ ~ ~ N ~ m c o U m E o y ~ ~ ~ O ~ v, a d v o m m a° U U c V °~~' U 3 c W o_ m U U 0 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ a Y ~ ~ c (6 ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ,N ~' ~ ¢ U ~ N ~ c7 p Q o_ 129 Public spaces should be arranged at the exterior face of the X X building 130 If at all possible, the kitchen should be placed on the same level X X as the ballrooms 131 I am a very strong supporter of the "Traditional Vail vernacular X -- I X style (Architectural Vision #1) The Traditional Vail vernacular style represents Vail in ways the 132 other choices do not. The Vail community is squandering a great X X opportunity to tie the Village to Lionshead by choosing anything other than option #1. The "popular" choice of option #3 ("Inspired by Nature") would be a great choice if Vail was a national park. But we are not a park; 133 we are a resort community and this conference center is a great X X opportunity for us to serve both of these niches -resort & community. Please keep in mind the needs of visitors, meeting planners and meeting attendees (the ultimate end-user and customer) of the conference center when choosing the design. The conference center must be able to stand the test of time. While "Option 3" 134 may seem like a novel and new idea, the same could have been X X said about Lionshead Village when it was built. Thirty years later, Lionshead is badly outdated and scheduled for a complete facelift. I'm afraid the same would happen to this conference center if you select Option 3. The new conference center needs to be a part of Vail, and that 135 includes the need to ensure that the center feels like Vail and fts X m the Vail architecture and design style. Option 1 is the best X choice! 136 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 137 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 138 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X , TEAMWORK ~IVI~ES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 9 Of 2Q ®?OOi All Righls Resaved By p:lcurrant praeclsl..W hitecWral Design Syle Commvnls.xls An;hile<lural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 TOWn Of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up By (p N C N N N Question /Comment ?~ `_ ~ ° ~ ~ _ .... °' ~ ~ ... = (~ ~ ..TJ rn .T. m N N r~ C N E N :4 ~ m U C o U m E o N ~' ~ C O _ ~ u, j o_ c o ~ m m ~ E E Q E E U c o ~ N U ~ w a o' p U ~, ~ o a 0 y 0 m ~ ~ o ~ ~ Z m o ~ U m ,_ U c ~ o 3 o o N ' a ~ 3 ~ m F ~ ~ ~ a F ~ a U O o a a 139 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 140~Prefe'r'Tne`iraditionai design (sarne form Teter frcm 13'1 - i35) h " ` ~ ' "' "°` ~"- 141 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 142 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 143 Prefer the traditional design (same form letter from 131 - 135) X 144 The natural design blends with the environment X X 145 The building should not be intrusive X X X 146 Natural, stone materials should be incorporated X X 147 It would be nice to blend the two villages X X I X' II I 148 The modern image looks too much like old Lionshead X X 149 The traditional design looks too much like the Vilar Center X X 150 The natural design is beautiful yet unique and is preferred X X i 151 Natural, stone, wood materials should be incorporated ~ X X i TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANO MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ~o Ot 24 ®2pp4 All R'ig~ls Reserved By . ,..._ ____ ._ ~_ Arrhilaclural Resource Consultants. Mc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up ey N N Question /Comment ~ °' ~ N . ~ _ N ~ -- ~ N - u -~' ~ N ~ ~ °' ~ ~_ ~ m ~' _ chi 0 E c ~ ~ E m .~~ N -o > m .~ j O U m .E O N ~ ~ 3 O ~ w a d ~ o a ~ o m ~ m 2 E ~ j V ~ o ~ m ~ U ~ o w a o! ~ U ~ o m o x Q 0 a Y 0 ~ ,~ ~ c l0 ~ ~ Z r G o ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ D. Q Q d d 152 Modern or natural images are preferred X X X 153 Do we really need more traditional buildings? X X 154 Copper panels, steel, glass should be used X X 155 Need additional detail on the natural design X X 156 Like the traditional design -should blend with the theme of Vail X X 157 Stone & wood should be incorporated X X 158 Traditional mountain style should be used which many people X come to Vail and the mountains to experience X 159 Like the traditional design in that it is timeless and is more X consistent with the New Lionshead X 160 Dislike the glass in the modern design - we don't need an "icon" that will look as dated as Lionshead does now. X X 161 Don't like the "snowcone" -unlike the sandstone museum, this building is in town, not on the mountain X X 162 The lighted tree is ludicrous and will create light pollution X X 163 Natural materials -stone, wood, stucco should be used X X "Icons" are dramatic statements or memorable ones. Vail is too 164 small for "drama" and should go for "memorable" -like the clock tower, the 10th mountain division statue, the covered bridge. X X "Drama" can get very dated. 165 The site can not connect the villages. At best it can extend Lionshead and file the library in to the Lionshead area X X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... P2JC 11 0( 2Q ®2000 All Ryhls Roserved Ry p:kunenl projxclsA..l4rchileclural Design Style Commenls.xls Archileclunl Resourco Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 ' Comment Category Brought Up By ( N C N y Question /Comment ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, _ ~_' N cp ~ T ~ ~ Y ~ d .N. U N N ~ N ~ ~ m C O U CO ~ O y ~ C O ~ N .O a _ o ... ~ -O ~ ¢ E m a o U o U y ~ ~ 3 d p U 0 ~' 2 o d o ~ _ m c ~ ~ Z N U °' ~ p~ O ~ N ~ O N o ¢ a' 166 The traditional style doesn't fee right -despite the look of the X X village 167 The modern is a good combination of "modern" with a good use X X of lines 168 The natural design would fit if it were nestled in the mountains X X 169 Stone ,metal, and glass should be used X X Prefer the idea of keeping the villages separate with two distinct 170 X X X " and appealing architectural styles. I just saw the three versions of the convention center and would like to comment as a 12 year employee on the mountain and Vail 171 resident for many years. Version 3 "Inspired by Naturex is the X X clear choice to set Vail apart the cookie cutter villages of Beaver Creek, Copper, Whistler, and Keystone. We shouldn't require architectural clues for people to realize we're in the mountains. It's time for Vail to step away from its ersatz euro alpine feel and make a statement. We must display pride in our alpine Rocky Mtn. roots and develop our own identity derived from the beauty 172 around us. "The house on the sketches had been designed not X X by Roark, but by the cliff on which it stood. It was as if the cliff had grown and completed itself and proclaimed the purpose for which it had been waiting." Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead. I really like the Vision 3 Inspired by Nature. This fits our 173 environment and makes a powerful statement for the spirit of Vail. X X Please do something with the LH parking structure to match. 174 Energy efficiency is important X X 175 Prefer the natural design X X 176 Prefer the traditional design X X 177 Prefer the natural, different look as compared to the traditional X X 178 Like the natural design but dislike the cone structure X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ~ 2 Of 24 O206t All Rights ReserveE By _.: _..___. _._:__..: ,....w::a:....: ne.:..., e:.ae r...........i~ .~~ Ar~hilxrlxral Rrwnr:x Consull.~n~c. Inr. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By N C N Question /Comment N (Q ~ N ~ N N «~ ' ~ _N - U (/> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U ~ ~ ~~ E C a> ~ N a`~ N ~ ~ m .V c o U m " E o N ~ ~ c O = ~ m ~ a c o =o ~ o m ~ m m~ ~ c U ~ U 3 w 0_ ~ o U c 0 ~ o 2 0 D Y 0 ~ c l~0 t- ~ Z U C m ~ c m ~ O a 0 ~ > . ~ a U ~ o a a' 179 The traditional option is the safest X X 180 Like the possibility of the natural design but the roof is concerning. Need to ensure it.looks good in the summer X X 181 Prefer the natural design but it must look good year round X X 182 Prefer to keep the traditional look X X 183 Like the glass of the contemporary design X X 184 Prefer the natural design X X 185 Prefer the traditional design X X 186 Prefer a more contemporary feel X X 187 Want more info on the natural design -can it be pulled off? X X 188 Need to ensure "green" construction X X 189 Need to incorporate "green" building techniques X X 190 Any image chosen must be genuine X X 191 The traditional image is safe X ~. X 192 It seems hard to relate the natural design to the adjacent properties X X X 193 Prefer the natural design - X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANO MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page t3 Ot 24 ~ ®2004 All Righls Reservatl By p:kunenl projeclsl..WrchllecWral Design SIy1e Commenls.~ls Architectural Resource Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments ' Comment Category Brought Up By m c Question /Comment ~ ~ ~ ° ~ _ ¢~ ~' ~ ~ ¢~ = U m m ~ rn ~ ~ m' ~, = t~ P ~ E E ~ ~ c ~ m ~ ~ 'o U m E o ~, ~ ~ ~ O ~ y a ~ ' m E U w o' U ~ a '~ m o o U U ~ N ~ ~ F' ~ Z d ~ m = V) m 'N o d Fo- a ~ Q .n a~ ~ U o a a' 194 Prefer the natural design X X 195 The natural design needs further development X X 196 Like the organic form of natural option X .~ _ .. ,. X 197 Conference center should stand out X X 198 Prefer the incorporation of a lot of glass X X 199 Prefer the traditional because it blends with the existing X X architecture of Vail 200 Most of Vail is traditional - so why not this? X X 201 The natural design is so much different than what we have - X X X concerned it might not fit in 202 Keeping in line with the rest of the traditional village makes sense X X Too much glass has been incorporated into the front of the 203 it i di i l X X -secur y ssue tra t ona 204 Dislike the modern image X X 205 Like the natural design and cornice but does it fit the site? X X X Like the concept of the natural design but the image is too vagu ~. 206 i t it f ll X X e to u y apprec a 207 Can we afford the natural design? X X 208 Be careful to not bog down the process getting the natural image " X X lust right TE!`MWORK OIVIOES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 14 Of 24 ®2004 All Rights Resarve0 By p1cunenl prgeclsl..WchilecWral Oesgn Slyle Commenls.nls Nciriiectural Resource COnsullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up By Question /Comment N N (0 ~ N N C ~ _ N 61 ~ "' ~ N N - = V (0 C N ~ U U O C ~ N y Ol m .V O U m O ~ ~ N (7 N d c o a ~ o m ~ m E Q~ ~ j CJ c o ~ m ~ U c W a tY p U ~ 0 o 2 0 a Y 0 ~ c (D H ~ Z ~ N ~ ~ W O) '~ O` d o ~ N Q :D Q O ? N U` o a The Jackson design fits will into the hillside, but does the 209 conference center site have enough topography to pull off X X X something like this? 210 Make the cone element larger than the Wal-Mart flagpole. Will it X be lit 24=7? Who will clean the glass? X 211 The natural option is appealing -reaches back to heritage of X Colorado -way back - Anasazi, etc. X 212 Make it look like old casino building -traditional X X The modern design looks too much like downtown Seattle -stay 213 X away from it -too urban X 214 The natural design could look cool or be a disaster X X 215 "Nature gone wrong" cone X X 216 The natural design is original and interesting X X 217 The modern design looks like an enclosed parking structure - X yuck! X 216 The traditional complements the village architecture -elegant and X sophisticated X X 21 g The natural design is too far out -will turn off attendees -too cutesy X X ~ 220 The modern is too modern -looks like the parking structure X X 221 The traditional is ok -should stay with the alpine theme to create X synergy X X 222 The natural is inconsistent with the existing ToV architecture. X X X 223 Stick with the theme of Vail - no need to do anything different X X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANO MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Pe9e ~ S Or 24 ®200a All RigMS Reserved By p:~CUnenl prolegs~..Wrchileclural Design Slyle Cammen6.x15 ~ Archileclural Resource Consullanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category wrought up By m N c ~ N Question /Comment ~ ~ ~ ° ~ _ °' ~ ~ = L, (n ~ ~ cn ~ cn N~ r~ N E N ~ •j m C o U m E o N ~ ~ C O ~' m ~ a c o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E Q o E U ~ J ~ ~ U c w a ~ ~ U Z, ¢~ a a o '~ o m ~ ~ `` ~ Z m U ~' ( c o ° ~ ' _ o_ ' ~ aci ~ C ~ ~ of N a F- > ~ o a - .o C7 U ~, o a ~ a 224 The natural design has a potential to be a symbol for Vail and is X X original and interesting Be careful with the traditional design -could become dated and 225 X X looks like the shopping district 226 The traditional is a good fit -consistent with the existing X X X architecture 227 The natural design could be an eyesore if not done rights X X 228 Like the proposed use of natural forms X X 229 Like the amount o f glass in the modern optiori X X 230 Should stand out from Vail architecture X X 231 Should_have fun with the design X X 232 Should flow with the immediate surroundings but not match the X X ~ X traditional Vail architecture 233 People come to Vail expecting the traditional look X X 234 Should be an architectural icon ' X X 235 Needs to work with adjacent buildings /structures X X X 236 Modern does not work in Vail X X 237 Seamless experience - go with what's proven X X 238 One vision of Vail X X TEAM WORN DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANU MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Pale 1S O( ZA ®200a All Rights Reservetl By p:kunenl projec(sl..W~iteclural Design Style Commenls.nls Architectural Resource Cmsultanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall 02 DEC 0~4 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought up By N C N Question /Comment ~ {~ ~ y ~ _ ~ N ~ ' y _N _ ~ ~+ in c ~ U m .'~. t~ ~ E m E m ~ c ~ m c ~ U w K _ E E U L o . c 3 v ~ Y V n a o =o o m m m ~j o ~ N ~ a o ~ . 2 . a ~ m c ~ F- ~ Z d ~ Y in ~ ~~ o li ~ !a a ~ a V j ~ c~ o a 239 Continue to consider multi-use space and options for sloped floors X X 240 OK to separate Lionshead and Vail village X X X 241 Ok to consider the modern design /elements X X 242 Need windows in ballrooms with operable shades X X 243 Good to blend forms /materials with the natural environment X X 244 Doesn't need to match the existing Vail architecture X X 245 Should stand out from Vail architecture X X 246 Not another Beaver Creek X X 247 Modern design already appears dated X X 248 Need further development of the natural option X X 249 Prefer the traditional look X X 250 The natural design needs further development X X 251 Like the glass of the modern option but not the overall style X X , 252 Prefer the natural design X X 253 Prefer a building that fits the environment as opposed to the existing Vail style X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... PR9e t~ Of ZO p:kunent prajecls\...Vvchileclural pesign Style Cornmenls.Rls ®20(14 All Rights Reserve] By nremte~wrel Resource conswwrns, m~. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought UP By N N C N y Question /Comment ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~' ~ N = u7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ w ~ aci m ~ m ~ ~ m c o' U m E o y ?~ c O _ > ~ > d O c N ? ~ E Q~ U ~ O c ~ N C U W d ~ 0 T U O O s O ~ "O O N `~ U O C O O N = d > > N (~ ~ ~ Z C O fn ~ N `O d ~ > ~ ~ Q U S] ~ c~ o ¢ a 254 Prefer natural, traditional, then modern X X 255 Doesn't need to tie into the existing architecture due to its isolated X X location 256 Prefer the traditional look X X 257 Modern doesn't work here X X 258 Prefer the natural design ~ X X 259 Modern is too far out there X X 260 Traditional is a little too bland X X 261 Prefer the natural style X X 262 Prefer the natural design X X Concerned with the balconies at the S. elevation -noise etc X X 263 affecting adjacent properties 264 Like the potential of the natural style X X 265 Should stand out X X 266 Like the unique modern structure X t' X 267 Like the use of glass proposed in the modern option X X 268 Like materials proposed for the natural X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 1E Of 24 ©2g0a All Rights Reserved By p:lcunent projeclsl..Wtl+iteclural Design Style Comments.als Mchileclural Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up ey N N Question /Comment O O N O N ~ w N _~ U (0 ~ C O _U U y V d E C ~ ~ ~ y ~ m ~ ~U O U rD O _~ O O N 0- c `o ~ o m ~ m Q E ~ j U c ° ~ w ~ U c 0 W ~- ~ ~ U ~^ 0 m a 2 n o 0 -Y ° ~ m a~ c ~ ~ ~ Z ~ m ~ °~ ~ rn O a I- ~' ¢ _ ¢ ~ C7 o a 269 Prefer the traditional but intrigued by the Natural X X X 270 Traditional feels like Vail X X 271 Modern is too angular X X 272 Natural needs more development X X 273 Make it "acoustically good" X X 274 Allow it to hold 2000 (concert crowd) X X 275 We live in the middle of nature -the natural design fits I X X The traditional design is, by far, the best choice for the 276 conference center. It embodies the look and feel of Vail (albeit, X an updated Vail) and would be a place that would attract people X to Vail and the center. The modern design is not appropriate for a Vail conference center. Its modern architecture seems to contradict our Rocky Mountain surroundings and the design seems very cold in 277 appearance. Considering Vail endures a cold alpine climate fora X X good portion of the year, a place that looks mare warm and inviting seems more logical from a draw standpoint (a place that brings people in) and an aesthetic standpoint. The natural design is okay but seems a little over the top with the illuminated cone and snow-capped ridge. The surrounding snow ~ 278 capped mountains speak volumes over any "snow capped" ridge X X that may be incorporated in Vail's architecture. It seems like this design tries a little too hard to blend in. am writing in regards to the Vail Conference Center.. I would like to express my opinion on the traditional design being the best for 279 the valley. I know that there are a lot of people interested in the X X natural design so I wanted to voice my opinion and support the traditional option. 280 A choice of the traditional design, will serve to match the vision of other buildings in the Lionshead area. X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MUITIP~lES THE EFFECT... Page 'I J O( 24 ®2004 All Righls Reserve) By p:`cunenl projecls~_WChileclural Design Sryla Commenls.xls NchilecWral Resource Consultants, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up By {p N C N N Question /Comment ~ N ~ ~ ° ~ Q/ _ . °' ~ N . ~• «T. m m ~ N c N ~ m U m ~ ~~ B C o E E (0 a~ y ~ m ~ U c o U m E o N ~' C o ~ v, - ~ a O =o N o m j m a E m o U c ~ U N ~ U .c 3 w 4. ~ [] U ], 0 n, O 2 O p Y O ~ ~ c ~ ~- ~ Z ~ U ~, ~ Q1 '~ O a F-O •~ ~o _ -p a U ~ C.`J t7 p a a 281 The modern design looks like a Ray Bradbury building, nothing to X X ' do with Vail. 282 The natural design will look so funny in the summer with a fake X X snow covered roof. 283 Like the windows in the modern design -they can be.used fora X X renewable energy source to help create a "green building" 284 I like the glass and windows in the modern design X X 285 The natural design will blend in too much. X X 286 Need something that screams "modern convention center" like X X the modern design. 287 Need to let people see out and in X X 288 Need to do something that will be featured in "Architectural t l ti Di " lik th X X ura on. gest e e na op 289 Need to consider the context of the area. Needs to be unique X X and say Vail TEAMWORK OIVIUES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page ZO Of Z4 ®20aa Pll RigM1~s Reservetl By Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town Of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought up sy c N C y Question /Comment ~ 0 y ° c ~ N °7 `~ `` 6/ _ - V >. to m d Z' ~ N .~. m U N ~ ~ ~ o ~ C ~ E 6 a1 ~ ~ ~ m . V c o' U m ~ o y ~' N 3 O x N ~ a ~ . ~o ~ o N ~ m a E ~ j o U c o ~ N y ~ U ~ o W o_ ~ D U ~, 0 ~ o 2 a 0 .a Y 0 ~ fO ~ c m F= ~ Z r N ~ c in ~ `O n. ~ v1 Q ~ Q U N C7 0 a 290 Consider locating not-for-profit offices within the conference center to create year-round vibrancy X X 291 Reduce the amount of break oui area acid create spine raked ~ X ' seating lecture halls X 292 If the information center is incorporated, it needs to be world clas - something I would bring my mom to see to get oriented to Vail. X X 293 Incorporate some retail space X 294 The alpine look is too far away from the village to tie in X X X The modern look is very attractive, but not functional -glass 295 needs a lot of maintenance and requires shading. X Sun=head=bright glare. Think about exhibitors needs with visual X presentations. 296 The natural look is my favorite. It might require some X modification -maybe combine a little alpine with nature. X 297 As much natural material as possible should be used. Needs to be low maintenance. Maybe stonework & artificial woods X X 298 Need a building to be proud of. X X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT ANO MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page Z7 0(24 ®2004 All Rlghts ReserveA By p:~curtenl prolectsl..l4rchilectural Design Sryle Comments.xls Architectural Rosource Consultants. Inc. P Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vall Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By ry N C N y Question /Comment ~ ~ ~ m _ ~_' N rn ~ ~, ~' rn ~ ..~'. (n `N, d L~ C N E N ~ 'O ~ m U C O U n E O ` ~ . C O ~ rn ~ d ~ iu ~ ~ ~ E E Q E E ~ c o N U ~ w a ~ o U ~ a o Y o ~ O ~ Z ~v o ~ U ~ ~,,, U C ~ ~ O ~ 3 O ~ 0 N ' 2 a ~ U ~ N ~ F.. C ~ rn '~ ~, d - o a Q :n o a Needs to be quiet -traffic pattern needs to be carefully thought through. For the current capacity one needs to be prepared for 299 groups of 2000 - 3000 persons. Loading pattern s require limits X X of 15 minutes for all. I miss a loading dock area. Should be able to handle 2 - 18 wheelers at a time. Do not underestimate waste management /handling 300 Ease of access is of utmost importance =infrastructure. X X Vail can not handle the lodging need this will bring, thus transportation is needed -buses, vans, taxis, conference cars. 301 Transportation pattern and flow are very important for meeting X X planners, as nobody wants to start a conference with complaints about logistics. Also it will keep people in town longer If possible a successful conference facility should bean 302 architectural icon that the community would be proud of. It also X X needs to have an element of design that allows it to age gracefully. The challenge is that in many cases icons do not age gracefully (the what were they thinking when they built this syndrome). It takes a unique and careful design to fulfill this requirement. In the case of the three renderings currently being discussed I am not sure that any of them meet this criteria. If you are unable to achieve the nearly impossible (an icon that ages well, i.e. the 303 Sydney opera house as an example) due to budget constraints, X X no compelling design, etc. then you fall back into the camp of building something that fits within the community (particularly the vision of the community we will enjoy post Lionshead redevelopment, post front door redevelopment, post Four Season development, post Cross Roads redevelopment). I am not sure we have had that option fully explored (multiple renderings) for the community to consider this as an alternative. I will repeat my concern that a design that is not in line with the Bavarian theme of the "New Dawn" of Vail both in the Village and 304 in Lionshead will seem out of place and in a few years will be out X X of date as well. It seems that for some reason the marketing of this process is stacked in favor of the "Natural" design; even the terms "traditional" and "contemporary" seem lame compared to the ter "Natural" as if the first two are sort of "unnatural". At least the 305 X X initial word for traditional was "Bavarian" so someone was thinking (even if the initial drawing was just a box) and of course the "Contemporary" looks like the Subway building which everyone hates. TEAM WORN DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page 2Z Of 24 ®200n PII Rgnls Reserve0 By n'4vrtenl vrueclsl..Wdtileclural Desion SNIe Commanls.nls NNileclural Resource Cmsupanls, Inc. Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 TOwn Of Vail 02 DEC 04 Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments Comment Category Brought Up By N C Question /Comment ~ N N ~ N ~ _ N m : N ~ ~' ~ U = -~ U . (n ~ ~ cn ~ N .~. cn U ~ m c L o ;' C ~, E N ~, a N ~ m V ~ ~ o U m E E o N a, _ N C 3 O ~ N •- a ~ a- a .D o ~ m a E ~ U tj U y ~ c o a ~ ~, 0 ~' 0 2 o d `o ~ `~ 0 ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ .N d a Q .o U ~ o ¢ a My suggestion is that someone sit with the architects of the Sonnenalp property and of the Lionshead Core and see if something can be designed that is both harmonious with the new 306 improvements and is also dramatic and distinctive, which seems X X X to be what underlies the Natural concept. As it stands, the "Natural" looks more appropriate for Disneyland than for a skiing destination with a predominately alpine/8avarian design. The traditional style is dated and would be the last design in the 307 X Beaver Creek dev. Style X The modern design is smart, modern, different, striking, very 308 X attractive and very buildable X 309 The natural design looks like a cave or tomb, uninspired, X depressing X 310 Materials should be green like Aspen if we can afford it X X Function should come first - "architectural icons" could be too 311 custom and costly -rather build green & practical. Can't we be X X tasteful and practical? 312 Never felt a bridge between the villages was necessary -its all X one village in my view. X 313 All three cµrrent "designs" are very unispired: X X The Traditional design is flat and plain, does not gracefully 314 X interact with the street or the mountain. X TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Page Z3 OT 2A 6200A All Righls Reservetl By p:kunent pro~eclsl..Wrchlleclural Design Style Gommenls.xts Architectural Resource Consullanls, Inc. \ /Design Style Comments 02 DEC 04 Town of Vail Conference Center Stakeholder Meeting Comments 02 DEC 04 Comment Category Brought Up By m ° ° ° Question /Comment ~ ~ N ° ~~ ~ m ~ ' - N ~, = _ M UJ m T. rn ~ .~+. ~ i, d N r acs ~ N E N ~ m j m ~~ C ° ° _ E E y iv ~ C 3 _ ~ .° d c ~ ° m E E Q E E ° ~. ° ~ N U c W a ~ o U ~ ~m o n o .Y `o m o = m ~° U ~ U ~ 3 0 2 a` ~ c ~ Z c iA m o ~ > -O ~ C7 ~ o ¢ o_ 315 The Contemporary design is any but that, does not incorporate X ingenuity, complexity, depth, interest and looks like the Minnesota X airport from the 1970's. The "Natural" looks like little Hobbits should come running out. A 316 Ronchamp gone bad. (Re; Le Corbusier) X X 317 My frst choice would be #3 Inspired by Nature X X 318 My second choice would be #1 Traditional Vail Vernacular X X My vote is for design #3 as first choice. I really like the way the design imitates our natural environment. It is also a very strong 319 plus to have the glass cone that will be easily seen from the X highway-it helps people to find their way and creases some excitement as they get closer to it. 320 My second choice is #1-the Bavarian look that already dominates X our architecture in Vail. I do not care for #2 Modern. Doesn't at all fit with what we have 321 architecturally and seems not to have any meaningful raison tre d' X e . .' TEAMWORK DIVIDES THE EFFORT AND MULTIPLIES THE EFFECT... Pale 24 Of 24 ~20W All Rigftls Reservetl By 9 / 10 Budget Summary ToV Conference Center 01 DEC 04 Description Original Budget 10 JUN 04 Bavarian Scheme 1 Natural Scheme 3 Comments Inflation @ 16% this year; Loading and Subtotal Hard Construction Costs 34,478,431 35,515,662 36,315,662 delivery now underground; 30 additional displaced parking spaces Professional Fees 4,234,532 3;279,258 ~ 3,279,258 Excellent procurement process Owner Soft Costs 2,735,000 3,646;114 ~ 3 646 114 Tap fee negotiations could save , , $500,000 here Contingency 2,387,203 2,432,635 - 2,432,635 Subtotal Soft Costs 9,356,734 9,358,007 9,358,007 Value Engineering Requirement N/A (1,244,785) (2,044,785) Total Project Costs 43,835,165 43,628,884 43,628,884 Interest rate increases Z:\projects\09 - ToV Conf Ctr\Estimates ©2004 All Rights Reserved by \ARC SummaryV~RC Budget Summary - 01 DEC 04 FINAL Page 1 Of 1 Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. y u ~ Attachrnen~ ~~ter Phan Summary REASONS FOR DOING A MASTER PLAN The Master Plan for the Vail Conference Center and the Lionshead Parking Structure has been drafted in order to document the evolution of the conference center design concept and the process by which the design has been shaped by public input and review. ` Specifically, its purpose is: 1. To describe the rationale for design and site planning recommendations and, by doing so, create a framework for decision-making by Town officials charged with review of the conference center and other future development applications in the east Lionshead area. 2. To evaluate compliance with (or variance from) the goals and objectives of the adopted Lionshead- Redevelopment Master Plan and other formally adopted municipal plans and policies that have relevance to the conference center site. 3. To demonstrate how specific contextual issues identified through public input, such as parking, traffic, and pedestrian connections, have been addressed in the schematic site plan for the new facility. 4. To identify and mitigate potentially negative impacts associated with the conference center, especially parking and circulation.- CONFERENCE CENTER PROJECT GOALS The Master Plan for the Vail Conference Center is an acknowledgement that a facility of its size and with its potential to generate concentrated activity can have a considerable impact on the community and. the neighborhood in which it will be located. Through the master planning process, the design team and Town staff have addressed the ways in which the project might further broader civic goals such as enhancing the urban design and economic vitality of the Town's commercial core areas and improving the functionality and appeal of the Town's fabric of landmarks, streets and pedestrian pathways. Specific goals of the Master Plan are: 1. To facilitate the development of a highly successful conference center. 2. To use the conference center project as an opportunity to create a strong and visible landmark as a welcoming portal for guests coming into Lionshead. 3. To connect the conference center to existing civic facilities (library, arena, hospital) in such a way_that a strong civic "node" is created, helping to draw together the Vail Village and Lionshead core areas. 4. To improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation to and from the Lionshead parking structure and along East Lionshead Circle. Conference Center Advisory Committee 12/ 1 /04 ~, ®~°~'~BNE ®F ~f~E ASTER ALAN FOR T'HE VAIL CONFERENCE CENTER AN® SHE LIONSI'-IEA® PAR6~CINC~ S~RIJCTURE a. EXECUTIVE SUII~NIARY 2 INTRODUCTION This chapter explains the rationale for the master plan document and describes in general terms the project, the site, the overall regulatory context of applicable Town plans and policies, and the process thaf has been followed to encourage public involvement. A. Purpose of the Master Plan . B. Project Goals C. Organization of the Master Plan Document D. Conference Center Project Description E. Description of the Site F. Applicable Community Plans and Goals ~. Public-Process .._ .. . - ... .. 3 THE LIONSHEAD AREA AND CONSISTENCY !I!lITH THE REDEVELOPMENT I~iASTER PLAN This chapter details how the proposed conceptual design and site plan for the Vail Conference Center respond to the Town's goals for the character and vitality of the Lionshead part of town, as set forth in the 1998 Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. These larger goals emphasize the need for an increased level of activity in Lionshead, improved vehicular circulation systems, adequate public parking supply, a more interesting pedestrian corridor between Vail Village and Lionshead, and enhanced aesthetic quality of the built environment in Lionshead. A. Vehicular Circulation B. Parking C. Public Transit D. Service and Delivery E. The Pedestrian Environment 4 THE EAST LIONSHEAD NEIGHBORHOOD: CONTEXTUAL ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS This chapter describes how the Vai! Conference Center conceptual plan responds to the concerns of the immediate neighborhood around the conference center site. Key issues relate primarily to residents' desires to reduce vehicular traffic on East Lionshead Circle, to retain existing pedestrian connections, to avoid major impacts on their views, and to preserve future opportunities for private development. 5 DESIGN AND PROGRAM ISSUES SPECIFIC TO THE BUILDING This chapter addresses the development program and design concepts specific to the building itself. 6 ISSUES OUTSIDE THE PROJECT SCOPE This chapter discusses issues that cannot be resolved ~by the conference center project alone, including the location of needed public facilities such as additional parking and a transit center, and the off-site relocation of activities that will be displaced by the project. 7 ~ IMPLEMENTATION This chapter discusses phasing, estimates development costs, and outlines recommended next steps. Conference Center Advisory Committee 12/ 1 /04 2