Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-06-21 Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionTOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 1:30 P.M., TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2005 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. Warren Campbell ITEM/TOPIC: Crossroads Site Visit (In regard to Ordinance No. #1, Series of 2005). (30 min.) 2. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB. (15 min.) 3. Lorelei Donaldson ITEM/TOPIC: Vail Local Housing Authority (VLHA) Interviews. (10 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Appoint one applicant to the VLHA to fill a vacancy. for a term of 5 years, ending June 30, 2010. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: There is currently one vacancy on the VLHA. The Town received two (2) applications for the vacancy. The Council needs to interview each applicant at the work session and then appointment one applicant to the Vail Local Housing Authority at the evening meeting. The applicants are as follows: Barbara May Steve Lindstrom RECOMMENDATION: Appoint one member to the VLHA to fill the vacancy, term ending June 30, 2010. 4. Mike Brown ITEM/TOPIC: Channel 5 Update. (10 min.) 5. Warren Campbell ITEM/TOPIC: Discussion of the First Reading of Ordinance No. #1, Series of 2005, an ordinance establishing Special Development District No. #39, Crossroads, and setting forth details in regard ' thereto. (1 hr.) BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On April 25, 2005, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on a request to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads. The purpose of the new Special Development District is to facilitate the redevelopment of Crossroads, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive. Upon review of the request, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted 7-0-0 to forward a recommendation of approval of the request to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, to the Vail Town Council. Please refer to the staff memorandum to the Vail Town Council dated June 21, 2005, for further details (attached). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize the following: 1. Continuation of the I-70 Noise and speed education and enforcement program by the Police Department, at a cost of $24,000 for the remainder of 2005, it i:s recommended I-70 Noise Mitigation capital funds be used fear funding this project. 2. Direct the Town Manager to include this additional peace officer position in the 2006 budget request. 6. Stan ZemlerlTEM/TOPIC: Information Update. (20 min.) - Agenda Items for meeting with BOCC. o Capitallmprovements o Transportation/Inter-modal Site o Fire Services o GIS Coordination o Mayor's & Manager's Meeting o Regionallssues - Confirm Vail Recreation District Sub-Committee Members 7. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor & Council. (30 min.) 8. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment. (4:25 p.m.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT A TIME TO BE LATER DETERMINED, TUESDAY, JULY 5, 2005 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING ~. June 13, 2005 T~?N~'OFVA{h~' PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME MEMBERS PRESENT Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill Anne Gunion Bill Jewitt Rollie Kjesbo George Lamb David Viele Site Visits: 1. Snowlion Condominiums - 1040-Vail View Drive 2 Public Accommodation zone district = Snowcat Access Route 3. Tracts C, D, G and H -Lionshead -Temporary Skier Services Offices 4. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Area -Vail Civic Center Driver: George Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 12:00 pm 1:00 pm 2:00 pm A request for a final review of a text amendment to Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-3, Amendments, to increase the height limitation for a sloping roof from 48' to 56' in the Public Accommodation zone district, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Tabled to June 27, 2005 MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 7-0-0 George Ruther made a presentation to the Commission pursuant to the staff memorandum dated today and went over some additional criteria and conditions related to this text amendment proposal. Dominic Mauriello of MPG, LLC, gave a presentation of the proposed text amendment and the details of the application. Doug Cahill opened up the hearing for public comment. Jim Lamont, representing the Vail Village Homeowners Association, presented the concerns of his client and expressed a sentiment that this is not the appropriate time to consider such a request. Doug Cahill closed public comment. MEMBERS ABSENT Bill Jewitt asked the applicant whether the value of an extra floor-plate would outweigh .the liability of having a substandard accommodation product. Dominic Mauriello answered no. Bill Jewitt went on to articulate his disagreement with the sentiments expressed by Mr. Lamont. Rollie Kjesbo asked George Ruther a question related to the requirements of the SDD proce:,s. George Ruther answered the question and Dominic Mauriello elaborated upon the answer. Rollie Kjesbo went on with comments: agreed roof heights need to be adjusted and ceiling heights in accommodation units need to be up to industry standards. Rollie Kjesbo alos asked about the definition of a mansard roof versus a flat roof. George Ruther answered. George Lamb stated he is on the same page as Mr. Kjesbo and that we are not quite to the point of amending this yet, the SDD process is still the best way to handle this issue. Anne Gunion stated she has two comments: one is that the stated intent of the amendment is to raise floor to floor heights in hotels, but the amendment does not accomplish that goal; and two, that the SDD process is still the best way to go here. David Viele stated he would like to first address Mr. Lamont's comments in that he does feel this process is the correct way to address the issue at hand. Mr. Viele went on to state he feels the text amendment is appropriate and 56' / 11' floor to floor is appropriate. Chas Bernhardt stated there are both pros and cons to the proposal, but a great deal of questions as well before approving this proposal. Doug Cahill said there have been many examples of properties zoned PA that have gone through the SDD process successfully and it is the best way to go through specific applications on a case by case basis. Mr. Cahill stated further he could not give this approval across the board. Dominic Mauriello stated he will get together with staff to further analyze this proposal and come back with specific examples of how this will benefit the TOV in the long term as other properties. in the PA zone district which have utilized the SDD process to go as high as 96'. George Ruther stated he will go back into the master plan documents and gather further examples of where and how certain design guidelines are applicable. 2. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6G-7, ~ Height, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a sloping roof which excE:eds 38' in height, located at 1040 Vail View Drive/Lot 62, Lions Ridge Filing 1, and setting 1`orth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Snowlion Condominium Association Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Vlele VOTE: 7-0-0 Matt Gennett introduced the project according to the memorandum. Bill Pierce, the applicant's representative, summarized the request by saying that the only sirnple solution to the existing roof leak was to build a new roof. No public comment was offered. 2 The Commissioners had no specific comments, but agreed that overall the request was a reasonable one. 3. A request for final review of a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for retaining walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels, a more complete metes and bounds description is available at the Community Development Department and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved, with conditions MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 6-0-1 (Viele recused) CONDITIONS: 1) This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the associated design review application and the Town Council's final adoption of Ordinance No. 17, Series of 2004, amending Special Development District #4, Cascade Village. 2) The applicant shall properly maintain the limits of disturbance fencing and erosion control methods throughout the construction of this proposal. Any modification to the location or configuration of the limits of disturbance area shall require review and approval by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board. 3) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall: A. enter into a lease or license agreement with the Town of Vail for the use of Town property; and, B. shall prepare a construction staging plan for review and approval by the Town of Vail; and, C. shall survey and then install all limits of disturbance fencing and all erosion control methods for review and approval by the Town of Vail. Bill Gibson introduced the project according to the memorandum. Tom Braun, Braun Associates, further described the proposal. Jay Peterson updated the Commission on the status of the applicant's negotiations with the neighboring property owners concerning private covenant issues. There was no public comment. Commissioner Gunion stated concern about reviewing and possibly approving a variance for retaining wall heights prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 17, Series of 2004, amending Special Development District #4. Jay Peterson responded that the ordinance was approved by the Town Council on first reading, but the second reading had been tabled. He stated the applicant's need for final approval of the snowcat access route design to finalize the private covenant agreements. 3 Commissioner Jewitt noted that the Town Council required the applicant to address the private covenant issues before the. second reading of any ordinance amending the SDD. He also complimented the applicants on the work that was done with the neighbors in pursuing their approval. Commissioner Lamb wanted to verify what types of vehicles would use the access rout.', to which Mr. Peterson replied that only snowcats would use of the path. Commissioner Cahill suggested that Vail Resorts pay particular attention to erosion control, especially during the spring run-off. 4. A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a public convention facility and public parking facilities and structures, located at 395 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Pylman & Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Tabled to June 27, 2005 MOTION: Lamb SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 6-0-1 (Viele recused) Bill Gibson briefly introduced items four and five according to the memorandum. Rick Pylman, Pylman & Associates, further introduced the project, including the background/history of the project and the development review applications that have been submitted. Sherry Dorward, a member of the conference center design team, described the overall character of the proposal and presented an overview of the applicant's project master plan. Scott Durgance, Fentress Bradburn Architects, presented an architectural overview oi~ the project. Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowners Association, mentioned that all electronic presentation materials should be on file for further reference. He noted this public project should be reviE:wed as if a private developer has submitted the applications. He mentioned that many questions were left unanswered regarding a future transportation center, Frontage Road improvements, mechanical venting/noise issues, employee housing, building bulk and mass, etc. Commissioner Jewitt stated his concerns about the CDOT approval process, locations for the charter buses, a future transportation center location, and employee housing. 5. A request for a correction to the Vail Land ~ Use Plan to designate the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Area and an amendment to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan to amend, in part, Chapter 5, Vail Civic Center Detailed Plan Recommendations, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Pylman & Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Tabled to June 27, 2005 MOTION: Lamb SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 6-0-1 (Viele recused) See minutes listed under item number four. 4 6. A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a temporary skier ticketing office and loading and delivery facilities, Vail Town Code, located at Tracts C and D, Lionshead Filing 1, and Tracts G and H, Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Approved, with conditions MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE:7-0-0 George Ruther introduced the project according to the memorandum. Jay Peterson, Vail Resorts Development Company, questioned the first comment detailed in memorandum regarding the fire mitigation required for the building. He commented that two years should allow enough time for the completion of other buildings to compensate for the needs which the temporary facility serves in the meantime. The most important use within the temporary facility will be the restrooms. George Ruther suggested amending the conditions to define what the temporary facilities included. Bill Jewitt asked what the impact of denying the loading facility would be to which Jay Peterson answered that 80-100 snowcat trips/day could be completed in order to ensure that the restaurants stay operational. George Lamb commented that this application seemed appropriate considering the amount of redevelopment occurring within the area. Anne Gunion questioned whether the re-vegetation of the bike path was listed as a condition of approval. It was determined that the bike path was reference in the conditions and that the path would be restored following the removal of the temporary facility. David Viele wondered why the loading/delivery route proposed was superior to another route. Jay Peterson answered that it was the easiest way to keep the run open/operational. Chas Bernhardt had no additional comments. Doug Cahill asked to confirm the re-worded conditions, which George Ruther detailed aloud. ` Following the vote, Doug Cahill asked about where the bin storage would occur near the facility. George Ruther commented that, through the condition, Staff would not permit the storage of other items in the area adjacent to the temporary loading/delivery location. 7. A request for a final review of a minor amendment to Special Development District No. 38, Manor Vaii Lodge, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow for the relocation of an elevator from the front to the rear of a building, located at 595 Vail Valley Drive/Lots A, B, & C, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge, represented by Bob McCleary Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to June 27, 2005 MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0 (Niels absent) 5 8. A request for final review of a text amendment to Section 12-7H-12, Density (Dwelling Units Per Acre), Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-3, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow multiple attached accommodation units within a dwelling unit, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Tabled to June 27, 2005 MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0 (Viele absent) 9. A request for a final review of a variance from Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to, Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a retaining wall in excess of 3 feet in height located in the front setback, located at 1837 Alpine Drive/Lot 49, Vail Village West Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Seven Vails, Inc., represented by David Flinn Planner: Elisabeth Eckel ACTION: Tabled to June 27, 2005 MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0 (Viele absent) 10. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-7, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a garage addition within the front setback, located at 2608 Arosa Drive/Lot 2, Block D, Vail Ridge Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Brenda and Steve Herman, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to June 27, 2005 MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0 (Viele absent) 11. A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an amendment to an existing platted building envelope and an increase of plat-restricted site coverage, located at 971 Spraddle Creek Road/Lot 8, Spraddle Creek Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Franco D'Agostino, represented by Zehren & Associates Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Withdrawn 12. A request for a final. review of a variance from Section 12-6D-8, Density; Chapter 12-10, Off- Street Parking and Loading; and Title 14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, to allow for a residential addition, located at 2854 Snowberry Drive/Lot 19, Drive/Lot 19, Block 9, Vail Intermountain Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Mike and Marla Haley, represented by RAL Architects, Inc. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel ACTION: Withdrawn 13. Approval of May 23, 2005 minutes MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-1 14. Information Update 15 Adjournment MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-1 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular 6 office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published June 10, 2005, in the Vail Daily. 7 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA June 15, 2005 ~~ ~ ~ .3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC WELCOME PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT Sherry. Dorward Pete Dunning Lynn Fritzlen Joe Hanlon Margaret Rogers MEMBERS ABSENT SITE VISITS 1. Hanlon Residence - 897 Red Sandstone Circle 2. Snowlion Condominiums - 1040 Vail View Drive 3. Phillips Residence - 2696 Davos Trail 4. Scolnick Residence - 2935 Basingdale Boulevard 5. Dantas Residence - 1936 West Gore Creek Drive 6. Dantas Residence - 1797 Alpine Drive 7. Westhaven Condominiums - 1325 Westhaven Drive 8. Vail Spa Condominiums - 710 West Lionshead Circle 9. Ryan Residence - 185 Forest Road 10.Anderson Residence - 1418 Vail Valley Drive 11. Kaplan Residence - 3030 Booth Creek Drive 12. Fritzlen/Pierce Residence - 4696 Meadow Drive Driver: George PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Kaplan Residence DRB05-0233 - Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 3030 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 5, Block 4, Vail Village Filing 11 Applicant: Werner and Gilda Kaplan ACTION: Tabled to July 6, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 5-0-0 2. Dantas Residence DRB05-0056 Final review of change to approved plans (driveway) 1936 W. Gore Creek Drive/Lot 46, Vail Village West Filing 2 Applicant: Michael Dantas ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 11:30am 1:15 pm 3:OOpm Elisabeth George 3. Fritzlen/Pierce Residence DR605-0220 Final review of a minor alteration (playhouse addition) 4969 Meadow Drive/Lot 11, Block 5, Bighorn Filing 5th Applicant: Lynn Fritzlen and William Pierce ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning George VOTE: 4-0-1 (Fritzlen recused) 4. Talisman Condominium Association DRB05-0160 George Final review of new construction (parking/elevator, stair structure) 62 East Meadow Drive/Lot L, Block 5E, Vail Village Filing.1 st Applicant: Talisman Condominium Association, represented by Resort Design Associates ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon. SECOND: Fritrlen VOTE: 5-0-0 5. Yue Residence DRB05-0205 Elisabeth Final review of a residential addition (deck enclosure) 665 North Frontage Road, Unit 32D/Sun Vail Condominiums Applicant: Thomas Yue, represented by TRD Architects ACTION: ,Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Fritzlen SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. That the Association acknowledge that this is the only type of enclosure approvable by the Town without an amendment to the "master plan" informally set forth through the approval of this enclosure. 6. Yue Residence DR605-0206 Elisabeth Final review of a residential addition (deck enclosure) 665 North Frontage Road, Unit 33D/Sun Vail Condominiums Applicant: Thomas Yue, represented by TRD Architects ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Fritzlen SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. The Association shall acknowledge that this is the only type of enclosure approvable by the Town without an amendment to the "master plan" informally set forth through the approval of this enclosure. 7. Dikeou Residence DRB05-0190 - _ Bill Final review of a residential addition (garage, media room and dining room) 3526 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 5, Block 3, Vai! Village Filing 3rd Applicant: Panayes Dikeou, represented by AH Architecture, PC ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritrlen VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant revising the floor plans to not exceed 3,041 sq. ft. of gross residential floor area (GRFA), prior to the application for building 2. No existing trees shall be removed due to the construction of the rear, stone paving patio. 8. Dantas Residence DRB05-0196 Elisabeth Final review of new construction (new single family residence) 1797 Alpine Drive/Lot 40, Vail Village West Filing 1st Applicant: Michael Dantas ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. Prior to Community Development acceptance of the building permit plans, the applicant shall submit to the Town of Vail professionally-engineered and stamped drawings of all walls on the site that are proposed to be greater-than four feet in height. 9. Westhaven Condominiums DRB05-0223 Matt Final review of new construction (multi-family residential) 1325 Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village Applicant: Mirus LLC, represented by Morter Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning VOTE:5-0-0 10. Snowlion Condominium Association DRB05-0207 ~ Matt Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 1040 Vail View Drive, Unit 303/Lot B2, Lionsridge Filing 1. Applicant: Snowlion Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 11. Ryan Residence DR605-0228 Matt Final review of a minor alteration (exterior changes) 185 Forest Road/Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Jack and Karen Ryan, represented by Michael Suman ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 12. Scolnick Residence DRB05-0099 Matt Final review of new construction (single family residence) 2935 Basingdale Boulevard/Lot 19, Block 6, Vail Intermountain Subdivision Applicant: Jay and Sheryl Scolnick ACTION: Approved with condition(s) - MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. The applicant shall complete a Town of Vail revocable right-of-way permit for all improvements made in the right-of-way to be submitted to the Town in conjunction with the building permit application. 2. The applicant shall install a monitored fire alarm system within the structure. Plans for the system shall be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. 3. That the Southeast Elevation (garage) not have vertical siding at the peaks under each gable and depict as such by building permit application. 4. That the deck supports have stone veneer carried up to the deck and depict as such upon building permit application 13. Vail Spa Condominiums DR605-0091 Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 710 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Spa Condominiums Homeowners Association ACTION: Tabled to July 6, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Dunning VOTE:5-0-0 14. Phillips Residence DRB05-0211 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 2696 Davos Trail/Lot 6, Block C, Vail Ridge Applicant: Carol Phillips, represented by TCC Roofing Contractors ACTION: Tabled to July 6, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 5-0-0 15. Hanlon Residence DRB05-0239 Conceptual review of a residential addition (new garage and remodel) 897 Red Sandstone Circle/Lot 1, Block 3, Vail Village 9th Filing Applicant: Joe Hanlon, represented by Amy Birdsall ACTION: Conceptual, No Vote MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): 16. Anderson Residence DRB05-0265 Conceptual review of new construction 1418 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 19, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1 Applicant: Vincent Duncan MOTION: Conceptual, No Vote SECOND: VOTE: CONDITION(S): Withdrawn Pinos Del Norte DRB05-0124 Final review of a minor alteration (tree removal) 600 Vail Valley Drive/Pinos del Norte, unplatted Applicant: Pinos Del Norte Condominiums, represented by Nedbo Construction, Inc. Manor Vail Lodge DR605-0182 Final review of a minor alteration (temporary access stair and walkways) 595 East Vail Valley Drive/Lots A,B,C, Vail Village Filing 7th- Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge, represented by Bob McCleary Staff Approvals Creekside Condominiums DRB05-0193 Final review of a minor alteration (stairs) 223 East Gore, Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 56, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Creekside Condominiums, represented by Peel/Langenwalter Architects Schoppet Residence DRB05-0232 Final review of a minor alteration (extend deck) 1803 Shasta Place/Lot 16B, Vail Village West Filing 2 Applicant: Mark and Andrea Schoppet Elisabeth Elisabeth (Matt Matt 'Warren 'Warren Warren Warren Belltower Building DR605-0235 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) Gore Creek Drive Applicant: Belltower Association, represented by Vail Management Company Reske Residence DRB05-0227 Matt Final review of change to approved plans (new brick pavers) 2319 Chamonix Lane/Lot 9, Block A, Vail das Schone Filing 1 Applicant: Brian Reske Forest International LLC DRB05-0060 Matt Final review of a residential addition (landscape plan) 45 Forest Road/Lot 33, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1st Applicant: Forest International LLC, represented by Steve Riden K & S Estates Residence DRB05-0200 Matt Final review of changes to approved plans (air conditioning condenser) 434 Gore Creek Drive, Units Al & A3/Lot B, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 5 Applicant: K & S Estates Lionsquare Lodge DRB05-0234 Elisabeth Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 Applicant: Lionsquare Lodge Homeowners Association, represented by Turner Morris, Inc. Vail Resorts Warehouse DRB05-0215 Matt Final review of change to approved plans (window placement) 923 South Frontage Road/Tract B, South Frontage Road Subdivision Applicant: Vail Resorts, Inc., represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Timber Falls Court DRB05-0219 Bill Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 4512 Timberfalls Court, Building 10/Timber Ridge Applicant: East Vail Realty Holdings, LLC, represented by TNT Specialty Constructors, Inc. Coldwell Banker Sign DRB05-0073 Elisabeth Final review of a sign (new display box) 286 Bridge Street/Lots A8~B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1 - Applicant: 286 Bridge Street, Inc., represented by Peter Papangelis Ellis Residence DR605-0214 Warren Final review of a residential addition (new family room) 5040 Main Gore Place/Lot A4, Sundial Subdivision Applicant: Daniel and Margaret Ellis, represented by Sortland Contractors Bailey Residence DRB05-0236 Elisabeth Final review of a minor alteration (replace wood decks with flagstone) 4257 Nugget Lane/Lot 1/Resub of Lots 10 and 11, Bighorn Estates Applicant: James Bailey, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Architects Hilgartner Residence DRB05-0243 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 1916 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 47, Vail Village West Filing 2 Applicant: Stacy Hilgartner, represented by Master Sealers Puetzer Residence DR605-0210 Final review of a residential addition (addition of two rooms) 2692 Kinnikinnick Court/Lot 9, Block 2/Vail Intermountain Applicant: Richard Puetzer Lazier Arcade DR605-0222 Final review of a minor alteration (new,patio) 531 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1; Vail Lionshead Filing 1 Applicant: Robert Lazier, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects Joe Bill 'Warren Sonnenalp Hotel DR605-0245 George Final review of change to approved plans (NE windows and doors) 20 Vail Road/Lot L, Block 5E, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Resort Design Associates Coldstream Condos DRB05-0244 Elisabeth Final review of change to approved plans (extending roofline, lighting support changes) 1476 Westhaven Drive/Lot 53, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Coldstream Condominium Association Mueller Residence DRB05-0252 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 1550 Matterhorn Circle/unplatted Applicant: Wolf and Suzanne Mueller Patterson Residence Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 4016 Lupine Drive/Lot 9, Bighorn Subdivision Applicant: Richard and Regina Patterson Seven Vails Corp. DR604-0579 Final review of change to approved plans (regrading driveway) 1837 Alpine Drive/Lot 49, Vail Village West Filing 1st - Applicant: Seven Vails Corporation, represented by David Flinn Joe Joe Elisabeth Antlers Condominiums DRB05-0248 Bill Final review of change to approved plans (tree removal) 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Antlers Condominiums, represented by Land Designs by Ellison The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during rE:gular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. C~ ~A'IV1)~YAIL '. MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Lorelei Donaldson DATE: June 16, 2005 SUBJECT: Appointment of Vail Local Housing Authority (VLHA) member ~j TbwNOF VAIN ` Town Clerk There is currently one vacancy on the VLHA. The Town received two (2) applications for the vacancy. One applicant is an incumbent member of the VLHA (noted by asterisks below. The Council needs to interview each applicant at the work session and then appointment one applicant to the VHLA at the evening meeting. • The applicants are as follows: Barbara May Steve Lindstrom* Staff is requesting that the Town Council appoint one member to the VLHA for afive-year term, ending June 30, 2010. • 75 South Frontage Road .hail, Colorado 81657.970-479-2136/FAX 970-479 2320 • www.vailgov.com =~ RECYCLED PAPER • P. O. Box 6017 Vail, CO 81658 Vail Town Council; Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 To Lorelei Donaldson and the Vail Town Council: I am writing this letter to not only express my interest in the Board vacancy with the Vail Local Housing Authority, but to introduce myself as an involved and committed community member. In May of 2005, I retired as an educator with Jefferson County Public Schools.. My 30-year career as a public school teacher ended at Bear Creek High School as a mathematics instructor. In 1989, I finished graduate school at the University of Colorado at Denver with a master's degree in Urban and Regional Planning. While earning this degree, I worked in a paid position as a City Planner for the city of Salida. Although this was ashort-term assignment, due to my responsibilities with Jefferson County Public Schools, I did gain experience in the areas of conununity development and small town revitalization. Previous to that, I spent one summer in Leadville helping to complete a land use survey and mapping of the town. My original intent was to leave education and enter the field of Planning. My area of emphasis in • graduate school was economic planning. Much of my course work at CU centered around economics and mathematical analysis. But by the time I earned my degree, I found I could not leave education and the career I really loved. It would be unfair and I would be misrepresenting myself to overemphasize my Planning experience, as this was not my chosen career. It would not be a misrepresentation to overemphasize my mathematical abilities and my skill at both written and oral communication. understand communities and community needs from the perspective of the citizens and local governments. I try to keep informed about local issues and know that affordable housing is a concern for Vail and its residents. I have lived in Eagle County since May of 2005. I recently purchased a small condo in Avon and am employed full time as a Concierge at the Austria Haus Club and Hotel (Sonnenalp Resorts) in Vail. I have been there since mid-June of last year. I appreciate in advance your consideration of my interest in the Board seat on the Vail Local Housing Authority. I can provide personal and professional references, if necessary. Please feel free to contact me at any time. I can be reached at: 949-0945 (home) 477-5805 (work) Respectfully, • Barbara May ------ - _ ~ __ _~ ~ __ :_ r..~ -- - I Lorelei Donaldson Vail Local Housing Autonty ~_ ~_~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Page 1~ - --- ~_ r.~.._.,-- __,~_~_.~___--_._-_ • From: "Steve Lindstrom" <slmf@vailmovies.com> To: <Ionaldson@vailgov.com> Date: 5/9/2005 10:58:19 AM Subject: Vail Local Housing Autority Steve Lindstrom P.O. Box 1152 Vail, CO 81658 476-3035 Vail Town Council c/o Lorelei Donaldson Re: Vail Local Housing Authority I would like to apply for reappointment to the Vail Local Housing Authority: My qualifications include: I am a local resident (1601 Buffehr Creek Road). I own and operate a business within the Town of Vail (Cascade Village Theatre, Crossroads Cinema). For 25 years I have owned and operated residental rental properties in Vail and Eagle County. I have developed several residential and commercial projects in Eagle County. I have served four years on the Vail Local Housing Authority. Thank you, • Steve Lindstrom • Vail Local Housing Authority 2005 Attendance Record 116!2005 1/13/2005 1/20/2005 1/27/2005 2/3/2005 2/10/2005 2/24/2005 3/3/2005 3/10/2005 3/24/2005 4/21/2005 5!19/2005 6/9/2005 Steve Lindstrom x x x x x x x x x x x x x Mark Ristow x x x x x x x x x x x x Sally Jackle x x x x x x x x x x I Kim Ruotolo x x x x x x x x x x x x x Ethan Moore x x x x x x x x x x =attended meeting MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 21, 2005 SUBJECT: First Reading of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2005, an ordinance establishing Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Crossroads East One LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC. Planner: Warren Campbell DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Crossroads East One LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC, is requesting a first reading of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2005, an ordinance establishing Special Development District No. 39; Crossroads, and setting forth details in regard thereto. The purpose of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2005, is to facilitate the ,redevelopment of Crossroads, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive. The staff and applicant are requesting that the Town Council listen to a presentation on the proposed ordinance and approve Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2005, upon first reading. II. BACKGROUND On January 18, 2005, the applicant appeared before the Vail Town Council for a worksession meeting to discuss the Crossroads _Redevelopment Project. The Town Council advised the applicant to return to the PEC to workout any issues of concern before returning to the Town Council for further review. On April 25, 2005, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on a request to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads. The applicant received approval for the establishment of a new special development district with the following deviations: • A maximum allowable building height of 99.9 feet versus 38 feet, • An increase in allowable density to 28.4 units per acre versus 18 units per acre (28 dwelling units over allowable number of dwelling units), • An increase in allowable Gross Residential Floor Area to 210,054 square: feet versus 46,051.6 square feet, • An increase in site coverage to 107,772 square feet versus 86,34Ei square feet; • A reduction in the required minimum area of softscaped landscaping from 18,420 square feet to 14,898 square feet; and • Encroachments of the proposed structure into the required setbacks on the north, south, and eastern property lines. Upon consideration of the request, the Commission voted 7-0-0 to forward a recommendation of approval of the request to the Vail Town Council. The Commission's recommendation of approval includes eleven (11) conditionsc of approval, as outlined in Section 4 of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2005. The: Commission's recommendation of approval includes the following findings: "That the proposal to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12•- 9A-8 of the Vail Town Code. Furthermore, the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission, based. upon thE~ testimony and evidence presented during the public hearing, that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided. Lastly, the Commission finds that the request is consistent witi~ the development goals and objectives of the Town. With regards to proposed building setbacks, that: a. Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. b. Proposed building setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations. c. Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light`, air and open space. d. Proposed building setbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. e. Proposed building setbacks will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. With regards to proposed building height, that: a. Proposed building heights comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan. b. Proposed building height will adequately preserve views of the Gone Range from Vail Valley Drive. c. Proposed building height will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. d. Proposed building height will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. 2 e. Proposed building height of 99.9 feet, while setting precedence, was mitigated by the proposed public benefits, of which the provision of a .public plaza on the site per the Town's Master Plans was the most offsetting element. That the proposed gross residential floor area of 182% of lot area, additional twenty-eight dwelling units over allowable (at 28.4 units per acre total), site coverage of 107, 772 square feet (93.6%) and landscape area of 42, 255 sq. ft. (deviation from percent hndscape) in the Commercial Service Center zone district is in conformance with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Master Plan. That the development is in compliance with the purposes of the Commercial Service Center zone district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Land Use Plan, and the Vail Streetscape Master Plan, and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. " A copy of the staff memorandum to the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission has been attached for reference. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Vail Town Council approves Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2005. Staff further recommends that the Developer shall address the following issue prior to appearing before the Vail Town Council for second reading of an adopting ordinance for the establishment of Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads: 1. The Developer shall prepare a written agreement, for Town Council review and approval, outlining the responsibilities and requirements of the required offsite improvements, as indicated on the proposed Approved Development Plan. This agreement shall include, but not be limited to, all streefscape improvements along Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive, public access to the plaza for pedestrians and Town sponsored events, which may include the establishment of an easement on the plaza and language in the covenants _and declarations for owners of property in the project regarding the use of the plaza for special events, inclusion of the loading and delivery facility in the overall loading and delivery system, payment of traffic impact fees and credits given to offset fee, and details for funding public art. IV. ATTACHMENTS A. Ordinance 1, Series of 2005 B. Proposed plans for redevelopment dated March 28, 2005 C. Memorandum to Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 25, 2005 ORDINANCE NO. 1 Series of 2005 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0.39, CROSSROADS, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE A, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT (SDD) DISTRICT, CHAPTER 9, TITLE 12, ZONING TITLE, TOWN CODE OF VAIL, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Title 12, Zoning Title, Chapter 9, Article A, Special Development (SDD) District, Town Code of Vail establishes a procedure for establishing special development districts; and WHEREAS, Crossroads East One, LLC has submitted an application to .the Town of Vail Community Development Department to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, to facilitate the redevelopment of an existing mixed use development; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail held a public hearing on April 25, 2005, on the application to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, in accordance with the provisions of the Town Code of Vail; and WHEREAS, upon due consideration, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail found that the request complies with the design criteria prescribed in the Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and furthers the development objectives of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has forwarded a recommendation of approval by a vote of 7-0-0 of this request to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, to the Vail Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the request to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, complies with the design criteria prescribed in the Title 12, Zoning Title, Town Code of Vail; and provides a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to adopt Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2005, and establish a new special development district in the Town of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Distt~ict Established Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, is established for development on two parcels of land, legally described as Lot P and A Part of Tract C, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, which comprise a total of 115,129 square feet (2.643 acres) in the Vail Village area of the Town of Vail. Said parcels may be referred to as "SDD No. 39". Special Ordinance No. 1, Series 2005 Development District No 39 shall be reflected as such on the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail. The underlying zoning for Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, shall be Commercial Service Center (CSC) District. Section 2. Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, Approved Development Plan An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities of a special development district. The Vail Town Council finds that the Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, complies with each of the requirements set forth in Sections 12-9A-5 and 12-9A-6 of the Town Code of Vail. The Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, shall be comprised of materials submitted in accordance with Section 12-9A-5 of the Town Code of Vail and those plans prepared by Barnes Coy Architects and Davis Partnership Architects, entitled "Crossroads Redevelopment", dated March 28, 2005, and stamped approved July 5, 2005. Section 3. Development Standards In conjunction with the Approved Development Plan described in Section 2 herein, the following development standards are hereby approved by the Vail Town Council. These standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads. The developrrient standards for Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, are described below: A. Permitted, Conditional, and Accessory Uses: The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed in Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, shall be those uses listed in Title 12, Chapter 7, Article E, Commercial Service Center zone district, Town Code of Vail, as may be amended from time to time. The approval of SDD No. 39 shall restrict the uses upon the plaza level tenant spaces to "retail/restauranP' uses solely and shall not be utilized for. "professional offices, business offices, and studios" uses, as defined in Title 12. A professional office intended for real estate sales may be allowed on the plaza level of the building during the first two years of occupancy following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy to allow for the sales of the on-site dwelling units and leasing of commercial spaces. No space noted as retail/restaurant space on the Approved Development Plan shall be converted to a dwelling unit. B. Lot Area: The minimum lot area fo_r Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, shall be 11,5,129 square feet (2.643 acres). C. Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, shall be as indicated on the Crossroads Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. D. Height: The maximum allowable building height for Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads shall be ninety-nine and nine tenths feet (99.9'), and as indicated on the Crossroads Approved Development Flan, described in Section 2 herein. Ordinance No. 1, Series 2005 2 E. Density Control: The maximum allowable Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) for Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, shall be 210,054 square feet and the maximum allowable density shall be seventy- five (75) dwelling units, and eight (8) attached accommodation units, as indicated on the Crossroads Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. F. Site Coverage: The maximum allowable site coverage shall be ninety- three and six tenths percent (93.6%) or 107,772 square feet of the total lot area, and as indicated on the Crossroads Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. G. Landscaping and Site Development: At least thirty-six and seven tenths percent (36.7%) or 42,255 square feet of the total lot area shall be landscaped. The landscaped area of 42,255 square feet shall be divided as follows: thirty-five and three tenths (35.3%) or 14,898 square feet shall be softscaped area and in no instance shall the hardscaped area of the development site exceed sixty-four and seven tenths percent (64.7%) of the minimum landscaped area. The landscaping and site development .shall be as indicated on the Crossroads Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. H. Parking and Loading: The minimum number of off-street parking spaces shall be three hundred thirty-eight (338) of which ninety-two (92) will be included in a private parking club and the minimum number of loading and delivery bays shall be five (5), as indicated on the Crossroads Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. Section 4. Conditions of Approval The following conditions of approval shall become part of the Town's approval of the establishment of Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads: The Developer shall address the following conditions of approval prior to submitting a building permit application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the Crossroads project (a grading permit/excavation permit shall constitute a building permit): The Developer shall submit a revised site and landscape plan indicating a larger landscape island located at the porte cochere entry to the proposed building for review and approval by the Design Review Board. 2. The Developer shall submit a final exterior building materials list, typical wall section, architectural specifications, and a complete color rendering for review and approval of the Design Review Board. 3. The Developer shall submit a rooftop mechanical equipment plan for review and approval by the Design Review Board. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the overall design of the lodge and enclosed and visually screened from public view. Ordinance No. 1, Series 2005 3 4. The Developer shall address the written final comments outlined in the memorandum from the Town of Vail Public Works Department, dated April 22, 2005. The Developer shall address the following conditions of approval prior to the issuance of a building permit from the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the Crossroads project: 1. The Developer shall submit a fire and life safety plan for review and approval by the Town of Vail Fire Department. 2. The Developer shall receive all required permits from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) prior to submitting for a building permit. Failure to receive the appropriate permits to access the South Frontage Road per the Approved Developrr~ent Plan may require an amendment to the Plan. 3. The Developer shall install a public safety radio communications system within the subterranean parking structure which meets the specifications of the Town of 'Vail Communications Center. The specifications and details of this system shall be depicted on the building permit set of plans and submitted to staff for review and approval. The Developer shall address the following conditions of approval prior to requesting a temporary certificate of occupancy: 1. The Developer shall submit a corriprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Design Review Board. 2. The Developer shall be assessed a traffic impact fee of $5,000 per net trip increase in p.m. traffic, or $345,000. The construction of the South Frontage Road improvements by the Developer, as indicated on the Crossroads Public Improvements Plan, shall satisfy this requirement. 3. The Developer shall post a bond to provide financial security for 125% of the total cost of the required off-site public improvements not completed at the time of the TCO request, as indicated on the Approved Development Plan. 4. The Developer shall provide deed-restricted employee housing for a minimum of fives (5) employees which complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13), as may be amended from time to time. The Developer shall cause the deed-restricted employee housing to be made available for occupancy and the employee housing deed restrictions shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder. The Developer shall have the right to participate in a pay-in-lieu program, if one is established by the Town, if he/she so chooses. Section 5. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Vail Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Ordinance No. 1, Series 2005 4• Section 6. The Vail Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. The Council's finding, determination and declaration is based upon the review of the criteria prescribed by the Town Code of Vail and the evidence and testimony presented in consideration of this ordinance. Section 7. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 8. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution,or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 21St day of June, 2005 and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 5t" day of July, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. ATTEST: Rodney Slifer, Mayor Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 5th day of July, 2005. ATTEST: Rodney E. Slifer, Mayor Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 1, Series 2005 cJ CROSSROADS REDEVELOPMENT VAI L, COLORADO Shee[IMec W u e n~eeo~. me uanu xmn uw~pi....nmw.nru~um~sc aink FmHEmxnmm wrpa,*tiaawmwxq NM' fumy LweY~COmo V.M t me magmn~ ~~~ ~ "`"' BARNES COY ~ , ;,~q mw„~,...a.a., ARCHITECTS arcntr ~ .~:.gro'~..eaa~., M..a~., za zooms ,ma ~.,, Attachment: B CROSSROADS vAIL, coLOaAOo ~ a -~ _~ r _ h e 1r 4 _ I + _ _ r r _ I ~ may"' ~}1 ~2 / ! J ~ d Q ~ J'y ~l ~_ ~Y B J r l_ E - ^c" ~ !' ~ I h . ~ ! ~' _ _ _ _ `- ~' ~ I ~ `~~~`7~"'.! BARKING STRRCTUR _~ r _-- f r ~ J 1 ,~ ~ y "~~ ..~r ~ j ca ~~ r! M ~~ ~~ ~ I r o ,~~ EAST~pE~WGRNE `V.,y C ~~'. J ~+. ,-, c3.,L~ ., ,w ~ a l~ ''"~;'"`.~- -''rte".. ''''~,~, ®~~ - i.- I r ~ ., "" ,s.--~ _1~_ - "~.~ N .. r ~~'~ fir! 'W~~ ~ Y ~tkNDER~ED SITE PLAN BARNES COY ARCHITECTS 1. ArcMt L5 P 5 \ ~S! -~ \ 4 Y ~ ; ~~. -~ __~ 1i r - / 3 ~ ~ S~ , ,..., ~~~~~~, I=-~L ,~~ _ ' ~ ~ - :~ - -_ ~, _ ~ I a ~ ~ _ fi ~._. I ,. __ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ S F ~~ GEN" f,, ~ E PLAZA SITE PLAN WITH 1~CE Rlma CROSSROADS VAIL, COLORADO t „~ £ ~ y~ ~ n/. ~' \ ~" ~^i :~,,. ~ o -~ ~~'':) Fi ~ ~. . .~. .~ i ~:' ~~ LJ ! ~ ~~Ye:.r. // ~ r -- ~_1; ~.~L ',' ~ . f; __"_ O R ~___ ± r--~ ~ ff ~'~,""~" BARN ARCHITECTS ~--- _ ~ _ _ l~ 'E^rFe _ _.-_" _____~(?H FRONTAGER~ ,. ~l1_` ~ ~ ~a__y ~ ~i (~ \ I ~/.. ' ~ y f EApKING BTRUCT~/ ~ ~ ~ CJ OPTIONAL ROUNDABOUT DESIGN BY OTHERS ~~°gi,~,d°pp1pme„~a, mro ~,;,,°"'°„o,,,a,,,n„ _____~ ~l~ `". ,, ~~~~ ~- ~`~ ~~ ~~~ -~ ~~ `~ ....__. _ __ _~~ _ _..._._--.w.. _. ^.. ---- '-`____---___-----4'~` __ .... _~ __ `~ __ ____ ;__- __M _4 c r - _ _ ... 1 I -_. '~/'- ` RIdrG~ _ ~ ~ ~ "~~ .. ___ ~ -e . - 1 _ ___.._ __^ .__ r . ~ ~ -- __ ... _ _ z . , ~ ._ . -. ,. i i ` 1 ~__ __ . . ~ / i ~ -~ ~, e ~ ,. ::: _ _ - _ \ ~ -' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~" ~.. - j . __ _ ~ r _ _. ~~~, _ __ _ ,~ ~ ..tea J r t 1 ' ~ ., C n., , . , ~-... ~ 1 _ f o , / 1 .. , . a eu;- ~ ~ - " 1 / 1 II ~vo o ° o ~ ' [ ~ ~ ~ u ` ~ ~~ 1 ~ t. ~ i ~ ..+ `^ , ' I ., 1 ,. '~.. / tj ~ s. J . 1 , e t o o ' µ I i~ ~ a k r - ~ ..,, . ~= J ~ { o ~ , 1, ~i ~ 1= _ . ~ a ~/ ,~ ~' ~ ~, ~~~ , ;. ~ ~ ~ , ,~ ,~ ~, ~1 ~ ._ ~ ~ ~,~., - N _ a ;, ` ~ ~ 6 , ~t ~ ~ ~r ~~ r s;, ~ ~~ ~Gli ~ ~, ~..,»..., __ ~__ ~` ~ 1 ~,. ' ~ ~1 . _. ,_ , ~:_ ~~ ~a.a. ~= z V _ ~ ~~ .. v ~Y { , i (J ' -- cr C= ~ 4 ~ ~ l ~ / .vim _ ,~, _ ~i _ ~ _ ~r I _ / ~ - ~ -I A I I r ` __ ll~' ` :_- .` /J ; ~,. ~ , ~~ ._ -,~ ., ~ ~ %~ 7 ~ i~-~..._ . ,mot ~ -~ I~ ou'0~o ~ 1. ~ ~ r ~ ~~9 .. .. < ' ~' ~ ' .r j~ r~ fi rs "xu~ 1 z. _ R -- ..._ i,_ ~i .~ ~..~ I ;_ ~,. .. .. . - '-. 6 [ _ r 1 , v lbt~ ..~~ 9 1~1 n0 '. ._. i ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~. , ~, . ~ ` ~. - ~~ .. . , ~ ~.. _~ ~. ~. ~ . .. ~ - ,,. ~ .r ,,; s y ~, ~~ , ~ nor s ~, ,. .. ti. ~ - ~ ~ -- 5 ~ ., ~ _ ~. ~ ~ , . ~ - ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ... , tin i : :~ ~i / / \ 1C ~~ ~~ ~~ .1 ~ U, ~ S ~ \ l _,~ \\ ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ` ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ~ s ~,~ .. ~ ~. - ~;~ ~..fi ~ - r .. -, -^- ~ .icNr~o~ '- ~`~ -n _ T-- -' -- c _: L 5~ ~'; -. _1 ~ z z', w a.; r _, _. _.R _,,,- ~ I -- --- _....~ -- J ..__._ ~- , _ ~ \- --- a f -" ~l4 •_ ~l _ _ - f _ - ~~I~ a --__ ~~~' r- ~ ~ _ •~ ~`~~ - w--.- ~' ` ~ • ~ . '' ~~"~ r= 57RSIDEWALK FUNDOD BY CROSS OADS~~~ ' l~f ~ j l ~--~~~ - .~ ~~~( ~ - ~ __ _~ I ~ ` ~; _ ~; ~ '~ ~ ~J• ~ -- i i ~ - -~'~ ;~~.~ ~ STREET~CA(~GIMPROVEMENTSAND hII %. EC ~~ v ~' ~ ~~BeQS*rtucr~e ~ ~ ~ i~ ~. SIDEWP~AFUND6D BY CR65SR ,~ ~ ~ ~` 1-. `~ p ~~ i~ _ ~ -~ , ~ ~r(~ . ,~ ~ ~ r_ ~ _r - - O r "'~ ~Y ~ ~~ ~i - ~ y, ~ ~ s -~ i r -_/ /~ I ~ ~ Via; I _~~' 1 ~ `" ~'` r ~ '~/~ ~. ` ~'I J ~~\ . ~~ (TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY I 1 ,,,~ ~~i-_ ~r..-•"'" ~~ ~'~ w~~ "~ i--TOWN OFVAIL __~_ ~ ,. _. ~ _.._. -- _ _ -~ r ~ - ---- e ~~-' ~ _ ~•_ ~ ~ r :'~ ~/ ~`' f ,°' _ 5~~ '•./i~~ CROSSROADS vA14 co~oaAOo H i --- ~ ~ ~ ~Aw ~' 4 _ ~ RWITH VILLAGE CERATION .' ~' - - r ~ r /~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - - . +.~,, - , - - ~, j•. " IMPROVEMENTS ~ •'/ ~'_. 1 ~ ~., ~ ~ w~~`~ i~ 1 i_-i '~~ r I / ~ , FJNDEb BYDNE s nssaini_ ~,/ i. ~. ~. /yi\~tt+'~TO BE FUNDED BY ONE , 'ILLOW PLACE( ~_ r-- r, `-t' ~„ ` lI -' - ~ i `. _,_ <~, f _, €3 ~ "c •~ - ~~.._y - -_~ I ~ w I 'i ~~, 'F j TO RECONSTRUCTED BY OWN OF VAIL AND OTHERS 7: `<' 1 `i t ,~ .. ~ / 'i. / ~ 19 =:.Ca , %' CROSSROADS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PLAN gAR w. ~ ARCHITECTS 1. ,I LEGEND h., `~n ExirnNC DECIDUOUS TR ' 4 EES \ `'! %~,~ EXISRNC SPRUCE TREE DECIDUOUS TREES 35'-b' SPRUCE TREE Jam. ~~~'+ 20' 25' EVERGREEN TRE ES ORNAMENTAL TREES\SHRUBS ~ SNRDB PLANDNCS Ems'' "~~PFRENNNLS/ GROUND C OvER PLANTING SCHEDULE SC ENPfIC NAME COMMON NOME TM' SRE REMMKS DECOUaus raEEs ovvlue tz ODNC NG ASPEN a I6 5 30' BkB Stak SPRUCE raEEs PA Pcao obiea COLORPDp SPRUCE TB 20'-25 BkB SbkeE PL PB P'cw ab ea COlOR4D0 SPRUCE Pnw oC>~EV BRSiLE PNE 10 6 35'-60' TO 25 BhB Slokee BkB StakeE ORNAMENTAL TREES SHRUBS AG M Acer~q nnoo N U MAPtf A Il l' 11 /15 AB" M. CI mevnc er v o o Sz5lUT00N 5FF'CEBERRy Cor o tena wnv Bue M 29 /5 ig• 2e• Hl. H C y n a D BLUE MIST SPIRFA i nl C b t l M 19 /5 B• 2A' nt Po a nava er r zo v a SPREAD NG COTDNEASTERO 31 i5 Ig'-2A~ Ht Pf a aeia'°~•Eaxx v~. e P t b i 3 CC a en rvbcavo v POTENRIU C l 95 /5 IB•-TA' Hl. CB omue eto on co omCenae OLORADO 000N000 Camu By e I] /g tB' 2A• Nt CS y a aencev IEr olxwcoD C h ' a (s le• za• Ht R4 ~NR nv on unt DocwooD P IT /s Ig• zi m bea oumum GOLDEN CURMM 25 /5 g• 2i H PUgvtE~LFAF BANDCHERRT 13 (5 tB'-2i Hl JS PM Juniparoua ec TABLE TOP BLUE JUN PER Pi 3g i5 g•-26' S0~ nue mugo N N MATURE MUfA 102 /5 18•-2V Ht. IA RHw~PEREN~NtgL AND GROUND COKR Sfl£CTION 10 BE COORDINATED DscwE coNrRACroR z. TEreRADE wlrERS SHALL HAVE MNUUM soa DEPrH of 30• EoR SHRUBS ANO PERENNWS AND 38" FOR TREES CROSSROADS VAII, CALORADO ____ __--- '__-_ 3PA 2vr "--___'---- --~_ 3PA '-~_~ ,-...._ __._..._. ~ '---._ _ .IPA PERENRRC--_~_. --__.. ~___--~._ __ \T _ - ~_ PUNIINC BFO __ _ ,~'' ._:' ~ ~~PLNIRNG BED _ ~__~-- ~~ ~~_~_.~-.--._... _ I - ' I i•~_ \I, pA ~~A IPE~Y ,,;. .. _-..._,_,.._ SOUTH FRONTAGE ROgp _ __ __ __-- _,~_ ,__ ~'__-. ~--~ ,' I Ir.l 'i t ~ ,. ~ ,\I ERENNLa1 _`_'_--~-" - _ ___ _ 9u /I~l A ~ T~.- I -Z s ___ Pmcalduc Eo C _ _ I ILAGE INN 'l T( Ts~ i~ ~. ~s _,~ _ ~-.. 1. / - -~I ~ f - - ~A ~ I v ~pgJr _ _ _ _ _ = _ ~_ I ' I _ Y~ ~, Jar E /' < L- ~ ~ 1PA '. ~ I ~ ~.' _ ~ ( ~~ f .f " ~.: ~ ~ \~ 5 ~ PtAN11NC BFD _ _ i Y I __ ~. ~ \ SI U I ~/ _ ~ I it , ' ' ~F{ l L G'1 J `f I F ~/J //R ~~ >~ ,; ~ f c _ - ' ~ ,"+ ~PEAENNVL (/~~ r F~~ ;A./ ~ ~ J ~ 9 I ~ _ ~ ~ ""__FF ~ / Noi~~wma+s Y1 - _. -',~ ~ y ~, ~ ~ eI ~ ~ ,__~. r~~ ~~ ~ ~ L. I Il ~ ~ ~I ~ x ,: 1 ~Y- ~ _ ~ r ~ t ' - _ _ J ~ L~ ~ TT ; 1 ~ TPi I ( P KING STRfIG}URE 1 ~ ~ ' _ r ~ _ L I '~ '" I ~ ~ - Ji I ,~1~'1 ~~ ~ R .. ~. ~ ~ ..-.~ -' ~ .' J - ~ ~ -. - ~ ~ : ' p ~ ~ ~ ~ I J~d s ~~) ,__ ~ - L-. C~..-._-..~ ~ ~ . ~ __ _ - k `.~ r t' ~ ,, ~ ~ ~~- ~~ ~, ,~i J I Aff ~ L PEN9~ _ ~ / a ~,~~~~,<""~~ _ - - ~~ _ - r~ -- f I , I ` w nANRNGS 3~ N FAEN PL ~ -'-- _ ~ ~ -~ .. ~ ~~~~.. ~-_ I ~ ~ P6 ~I KRVASPENS PUwDNGS \ ~ ~ - ~ - __ ~ ~~ ~ It - r~ °,~'~ „a~.~s t ~1.~=1 3PM ~ Ea IsPENs -~ sr l ~l II ~ 'v~~ / I / .~ ~ ~~ti~t. F ~,1~ I ' ~ ~ I ~ I I~ rte. o-. (a~, //~~~t sPnssc / / 'I ~'~~ ~~/ y4S ~~ ~~~>~ J ~ / ~~. _ _-s ~ -~-.~..: , 1. y~"~~•~ l~" _' =`i.'°~~' /`yam.'/ ^ - ~. Wit- - ~ ,., .` ~ • W ORNf ~~ M~ _..~''~ I ~~I.l / /~ ~~.{ ~~/////t//® LI ~I- ry~ {t _-_ . y.. ~ ~ ~/ / P t/ o ~ a~~ r>~:^ e a ti D F:'~'.~t ~ ~ _. ~NDSCAPE PLAN BARN ARCHITECTS 1. Archi[ is LEGEND -- - _ ~~ ' EYi$nNC UE<iDUOU9 TREES ---- -~-- _ - ' - - ~. E%~STN4 sRRUGE TREES ~ ' ~ ~--_- .. ^r ~2 --- ~~ ~ _ i ___ i ~ DEC~DUOVS TREES -- / ~ ~.J ~- s N R~lA GROAp J5'-U" sPRUC[ FREES ~5 ~~~ r OU ~ O ` _ / ` h wILAGE MN RL~ ~// ~E~_ _ ~ ~~ ~2 f 20 -i5' EVCRGREEN TREES / _ _ r _ _ ~ 1~ / r>• - ~ I I~ 'V CRNAMENi,4 TREES\sHRUBS ' e ~ ~,~ ,rvRJB P„~rN~9 ~ ~ ~ ~w L ~PEREN .R~~uNC ..ovER ~ " ' .. 1YffSE PLANTING SCHEDULE - ~ i r- I~~(IYJ~, ~`' SCIENlIEIG euME On IZE REMBR%S ~ COMMDV NAME ~ I I ' DEC DVOVS ~ _ r rHEE~ /rt 1 _ ~~ Ou.Ut N'41 eSPEN tlee 16 1.5"-].5" BkB SraR ~ j'" J 1 - ~f SPRUCE iRE£5 ~ *E" I ~~ ~ COLOR%.DOe sPRUCf 38 2D-35 BkB Stowe 7\ e \"-\ \ [3 S E CLORApp SPRUCE rC ]5'-e0' BkB S~aee ~ ~,,\ 1~i 1, -~ RB BRi51LECCNE PrvE 6 0-35' BkB 5164 ~~1\~`\,1'\ ,~ . l` ~+e an[vi4'iREe[5 5 RUBS t F. pRN H (((~a~~y~ u AGN N MnPL[ is yi5 RB' HL. \ \ .I 'UiOCV SERVO BBCRRM ;zr~r ~ `-- C CoryopLMS n na ~e 24 i5 iB"-2a' v H cmw,EeRae. no..anLR~ i9 /s e•-a" RL lscz,.g~ ... A FAD VG COIONFASrERD ]t IS tB"-24' Ht --- ^ PO Douro uu o _ FA6i MEgpOLy ORiVE ~~'4i( 1 Q DuBLC vvEB%R% ~ ] /5 ~9"-Sa' n ` ENiW oeR 95 /5 iB" 2%' H ~~°~ ,rq, ,,~~~ - ~~ ~\ ~ ? ~ __....-_ C ,ti'N'. 5 ~ F Comr '~.,`'Y. cOLORAOp .e i] /5 B' 2A Hi YFS~ B 4em B ' \\ ~~~ \ OCx 9 /5 i9'-2A w "\ 5 C~~ r e i2 /5 e' 3A H ~ a i. \ C 40L E R%er 35 /5 a" 2i H ~ * SWiss C.yu ET \ ~R L£ LU 9ANCC~ERM t] 15 ~5" 3e" w _ >HLE RrOPeRIUE JUN PER 18 I5 -2a' Sv- Sw3N~ u ~..u9a M tNL'L ~?,~.'~~ NAruRE Mvcoe iD /s .e'-za m wm~ uN„ERENNUL .Ai.aAC*RpR~N mvER sE.ECr~DN rc BE coDRD~w.rfD ~~~_ 4 -~?'~-~ .$ t ~,a~ ~3. L DEPEH DE SO" SCR -" `fit J,.~.. ~ t^+A4E ..RS wv fRENN• w. _ RE _ 7 >~ '`~ ~'; CROSSROADS vAt~, co~owu~o ~ _,~..~ R '? 4 d r ~,..~.- ~.r a1 ~' t v;~1 ` - --- - *D,u DN-sf soFrs;wRE is,]zs so. n. LE55 aRFAS uvDER JDO 5 3B sD. ~ ~~ rorAL oN scE H.wsuPf _...:~%.aL I- LANDSCAPE AREAS BARNES COY ARCHITECTS Archi[pt[S l l~ CROSSROADS VAIL, COLORADO ~- ~lo,.i PARIONG LEVEL 3 ~+eisz.3a~ oAniM~_ BARNES COY ~k ~ 16a ARCHITECTS 1. Archit u I E ~.F. t ~~~m ~ Im ro~ ~~ ~I ~~~ , j ~ ~~v , ~ ~ ~ Wpm ~m I~~..~ ,~ ~'. I ~~ F t ' ~ ~ ~ - - - rr '. r t t r "'°"'~ a...-ice.-. J `_ ,u ~ s o~ ~~ _ ~ __ . n~~ ~ ~_ i K 1 ' ~~ ~ ~~ _" ~~~:UG ~ 1 ;,,,; ~ ~ ~ obi ~ ~ ~ ~ ,' ~~ ~ ~. }~1 ~~ '~ ~! u_ _ a ~; , \ --- - i ------ir -~~ ~ - \ ~ tf WY /~ ~~~ 1 1 ~;'ty ~~~ X11 ~~ ~ li 'I ~~`•, ~ %~ ~ ,1 0 11 ~ ',~!~ ~ i ~~ 1 ~~ :/ - '~ ;, _~ ~ ~~',. __ 11.1 _ ~ I I ~_ _ ~" R~~~ CROSSROADS ~~ (~ \;" PARIQN6P \ P AND RETAIL {+8165.34'DATUM_ BARNES COY , vA14 co~oRAOO ~ • n ~.. ~~:~ ~~~ ARCHITECTS M,u ~ _ l~ rE~'~~ //,,` N,..R~~ tea. moos ' ~ , I. I„ , ,~„~a ~ r ~ ; m ; s~~ ~, t F E E O ~.. ~ f ~ ~- ..FO t F - ~'3 ~ 5 F\ ~; ~~ /`-~ ~" a i~! 1 tee. sere. ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ,?' ~ 1 ~.,~/l ' . ~r~ ~ ~„~ '~,';,', I III I I N ~w ~~ , ' ~.h:• ~/ `4 \~~ ~ +1,11` ~, ~` ~". / `,•• `` M`• ` // / i , ~ •• U•. / u r el ~ ~ \ \ r~ l I \ I ..CC }r` i ~ {I _ v -- ~_~. i Il- // _. f _~ 'r .: ~ ~ ~ ..,_ _~ .. o ~ ... k ~ - : ~ ~ ~ I ~~>~~~ ~~ =_<_ - ~ ~ ~ ~' .f ~ ,Ili .z _ ~~ ~ --_ _- __ -. ,•, i - 7. .,.I `c ~ ,~ 1 /` ,~ ~ ~ ~~ tom- ` ~ /~/ ~..d ~- __ ~ I ~i ~o /~ ~ ~ ' __ - I - 1. FL~J ' i ~~-~ ~, - -- - o ~~~ - -- _ , `/ ,• I I I' •\ .. j ---" ~~ --~"-`~-3~--------- , ~~~ ' ~`~ /' PARIGNG LEVEL 1 AND RETAIL +8179.34' DATUM) CROSSROADS=-==-_=---~' __ .~ ~; J ~.,.,.s> ~ BARNES COY ~ , vAIL, coLOw~oo ~ ~ ~ ~l / ARCHITECTS A¢ni ~ JOW DRIVE I - - _- _ :,il r,..R~., ~a zoos _ ,.~ _ ~` i ..~,R.- ~. y~~ ~ s a su ~ ~a~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~x~ j i -~;, _ 1 ~"~ .%Y ~~_ ~ i, I \~ I ~ 1. 1 ~ I,', ~ \ ~_~ % I• ~ i, 3 ® m r- ~ ~ ~1 ~~ . I„a o® ~ ~ ~ (( ~~fA ~B® ~ ~ ~ 1 ® o ~ ~^ ~ i ® ~ ®~® ~' ^ ^ ®O® ~~ 5®® ,~ ®~ ® ~ Q27 / ®® ~i SE 0 ~ _ _ ___ - ~. ~ ~. 1 G . -1- p ®p /1 ~ ®~ 1 ~ "k/ 1 11 ~1f 1 1 1 1 1 -- ~, - -- CROSSROADS __ VAIL, COLORADO __ __ __ ~ ~ w o ~ W Z U w ®• ~ ~ W / / Q~\~JE ~~~ s~ M~ ~ - LOBBY LEVEL (+8192.34' DATUM) BARNES COY ~ s~ u~c ~a ~ ~Z~,m~~ ARCHITECTS nRn+ L: o~~~~~ _ M..a~., tee, zooms ~ ~ W O \ ~ i W ~ F W /~ U w g - I ~ ~. i . ~ ~u~ ~ oR~~e ~°°~ s~ ~ CONDO 2 LEVEL (+8203.84' DATUM) BARNES COY ~ wv .a ~ IB UNiiS TH6 LEAH ARCHITECTS acnic 2 lOIX-0Ri TNIS lEV6 mnaCM 2B, Zoos G~ ®B 4~ ®a I~ ;,!, I!I ,I . -- . X40 ,. ~~,,,~~,~~,~,~;;~~~~„ 3 ~~, ~ o~, f ,,, ._ ~~ ___ / /~. .n~ e 0 -- ~~ - ~ - vn~L, coLOwaoo - - ~~~.. ~~ ~, ~ o~oRNE ~~~ ~5 _ CONDO 3 LEVEL (+8215.34' DATUM) BARNES COY ~ sue: ups-ro • 15~NmTM6~ ARCHITECTS nRm ~ ~~~~~~~ r~Gr C~ i ~1 ,~? ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~a ~i~~ ~_ ~~ ~ w ~ . -- - ~fi ,, =-- o® -= 46 _ -~:= ,. ~~'- CROSSROADS --'- ~ ~ ~ ~ =- VA14 COLORADO ---- -- ----_____ --~ ~i~i I II ~ ii i~~~~ ~~i ~~~ ~I~ Ili i~~i ~~~ Ili~~~ ~,- o~oR~,,e EPS~ ~~~ II L. 1 v uNrts ras ~tva z ioaca~s Tws ova. ~~ 'I 0 ®~ ~ w z w U W g J_ ~~ BARN ~ , ARCHITECTS Arcni ~ . . ~_ I'~I I_ ~ ~ - - ~ - -- _ -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - ~ -~--~i ' - I i~ - ,AI IIII ~IIIIII!I ~Ilil ~II~I!~I~ `i -- _ j , ~ ~~ :il - -- Ili I, I ® ® ® ill ®®® _ _ ! I ~ ( I / 1 u' 1 1 1 n i I i / i I I' 'i it I'll it I - I ® III ®'~ _ ~~ i~!I I ___ I' IIf IIIII II II ~ it it ~~ ®® i IIIII 1 I ®® - li , _. _.. :o III IIII ~ I IIIII 11 i, _~ _ ~- III 11 III - - ;~( li~- IIIII Illi Il;j Ij - i~ ~ I~) I I 'll it i ! - = i. I~'i!I- \\~ ' .~ ~ ~\ w _ W I - U W 1 3 J_ \ 1 ' 1 ~ ' I IIII! Ili) i /~ 11 I ~ II I II !~i I (I~ 8 - ~ - oli _ II ' i ~" y° ~ ~\ '.III i I I - _ I - ~ III __ ~~ - = I - ( I 'll! III II. .II II il~ it ~ I I I -- ~® r ~ r e l ®~ `\1_~ ~ _ IIII - _ ~ I!I i) i II1, !I III I I~. -~~ it i.il ! ~ _ _ '- ~, , ~, IIII'_ II I;I III IIIII I 'I ¢I O O ~ - _ s -~_ . _- I I I' r : ~"V ! III . I I ~~ _- - = -- -- -- - ' Ili I ~I I ~~~ _ _ o ''i"IIIIII~- ~ I I I _ __ I IIII I ~II -_ - s ,-; 'G =~_ -- - __ -_ - _..... - -~_ - __-- _-_ ~.~, y, -- _-- ; ', --== --- _ - -- ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ III/ ~~ ' _ _ -- - -" - ~o~ CROSSROADS -- " - ""- CONDO 6 LEVEL (+8249.84' DATUM) _ _~. , . as BARNES COY VA[4 COLORADO - --- . . -- -- - -- ---~--- Z~~~S~ ARCHITECTS O LIX]C-OFFS Tl45lEVEL ~~~i~ M..a~., tea. ~oo~ ~~ a~~ t 1 d '. ~~\\\\~ III IjI ~ I-I, 8--- ^ ~ Iii I I- --__ _ I _ _ !-li Ili ~:.~. .., ;. ~ , ': ~ ~ _ /ice ~ ~~ \\ . I -- - ~ - - - - _ .... ~. - - _ --- - ~ -- ~ - - - ~\ \\~\\\ 8_.._ ~~~~,i (I I ~I-- -III -- - II - ~-11-~II'~~~~~ - - Illill-I- _ - - - ~° B-€ q\ - e= ill .. .....: _ ,... --- -g-'iii. . <. South Frontage Road PARTIAL ROOF PLAN OUTLINE vasmn~ owe meee~e vem.,io~~ mnxrm r.,aur~ na~.em ~a aTmn~ me<ms..d u.us w.+y~v ~eue~..m~~ ~rave~. ~~ ou.uoeur o~r~ewns and>~.mi e.r qme e.vmveu ~~ w m.am..n~u,e~y, Levu m.mue.c a+a9 ~m e• ~"~°4~ smv m~mt4.m~ 'ia ~~me Iw~ismm.~ ~ ~ ~°°r roem~vtBUN 96q mtleaaegmeM eUYe Pee lWpkeE (WLSMe.)Aa EYn naNOixmd k"b+ tlvntkls4 k~ temnl Ekk .o,e.e nee.,m.~ h.u rosueure.asay °~~ ~e a.diee. d° Q° (.e+.eiw.i ~ m.am. rn w+.e ,b mua .earmman ar ume au,.e r`i Y, i ~ I °""""` u9 _ ~, I ~ ~, ~.~a- -..~ _ _ , s ;, _ ~,~. ~ F - .. ._' . Py5ee5bs- ~ve• ~`. - - - . =1f._._ name- vnmrslo~. ~ _. reVe~a SSrorme wH~.am~a ~iaiMefm Snur~ eNmtl ~9'ti 6' ~^^~, py9N gee. . evnntlprs ce. lean ea Tent Un ~ra.lt ree a~"""~i0 - _ ~.r M peermel6q nnatl5. MSeB An~ ee~uue m.<vmree menvvn ,.y re South Frontage Road m„.~ w,~ ~auue~u _.-~.'.~ NORTH ELEVATION CROSSROADS BARN ~, vAIL, coLOw~oo ARCHITECTS A~ChI t: M..a~.. tea. ~oo~ ~ ~' .. . •` ' ~ ~ '~ ~ . I •\ ~ ~ .\ I I .\ . °~, ,` i ~~• -.._. ~.._.._.._ ..........J ~~~~ ~~ •~ ~~- ~~ ~~~ ~~~s ~.~~ ~~~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ •~~ Z ' \~ ~ ~~~ ~ i ~ 1, ~ ,~I ,be„a~, ~~~ i ~ - - - ! ~ ~ r ~~ ~ .- ,.., a "`~ ~~~ti _ - - _ s~~_ _. _ _.. _ , ~ ~~. .~~., - o ~s~~ ~~. +~~~ ,~ .~ ~~~ __ ~'~` ~. CROSSROADS , EASiELEVATION ^~^'^ BARNES COY ~ VAIL, COLORADO ARCHITECTS ~ Arch, ~ 8 ~ 0 8 ~ ~. ~~ w.m,.iom.- u . ~ e r•,.uber ~~,,,~. ~m~m~ ,~ .. o ace m~an~•i °irni+^° •~„~,,,d ,y,,, CONDO-2 PARTIAL PLAN OUTLINE eemn~~ww+ ~y w~~.u~ pm dm ~e~.s sox. ~ -isu• savrH Sce ~mM1N++C MmYS yme~ Sbd Sbe Ag4M5s6me Mml Ntratlrq ~Pfi81E~ ~~•P°~°°r m~a m..~m,~.l and emMpa ~Wmm~mee m.mw.m ,ea Noea~emw aee ~„e,,,,~,>~, .p tr u, .mow ~ ,®,,,. ~ a- 1, ~~ ~ IM 1.~~. a• ~~: ~ m.~..~d.~,~ ~ I ~ I I I .. l t i , ~ 1 - i _ 1 - ~ - ~ w we 1 j ~ mneaa9miw/ , ` f , I - _ T~- t dF~ M1~~tN ' °'°"°"`~ f 1 ' ~ - tj, 1 -~ ~ , - - ,.~ ~~ ,~~ x ;~ ~~i _ ~ - - iii; 'p u• ~ ~° _ _ ~mel~POtl ~•~• A _ _ _ OilnMpel A®IQ...•~ 1 1^ t. - - _ ~~ Rtl>IDrrt- M UNLMme aYAD.~e- Ltl4W VM MARpGIfl85 - -1~°~ 11YSbT5Ae- ry ~+P'~dr.C~9d Thbm'rtaele lsge'MLYy Py mdSbe- ifmKk fftl mdevntll~ aeneltlp kM Vmrnak\M1O LL~ ~- ~ ~ East Meadow Drive CROSSROADS BARNES COY , VAIL, COLORADO UTH ELEVATION ~ • .r•Ies~ ARCHITECTS A~,I ~ i i i i i i i i - :t - i i i i i i i ~ '~ • .~• - • - .\ ,~ .~•. ~• . ~~- ~a ~~ roa ir' I a.l r. i .~, ~~ .. ~• ..,3~' ~~ - ~~~ I~ ~tit~ + ~ ~ f iii - ~ { . nFUel SaAbr . . _ 1 ~ ~ Alu h I J I ~ .~~~.~` j ' 1 - _ J _ l i; I ; ~ ' I 1 btlary~t4npesm't WmWNm! ^f j ~; ~ = ~ . ' i ~ ~. ~ ~• - 1.Tc like (v0 ." ~ ' .. _ ~ i _ h:. _. __ - - - .~~,~ ~,~ ~~~ .. - ... _ ~ - i . i ~I,I,~1 ,' - _.. - a.,~~ ~^~ ; v~,e~.e,eam~..e _ awnmsmmnnn WEST ELEVATION e.9e~xs.~ .a~~~~~ mm see. ~ -isa mm CROSSROADS BARN ~, vAIL, coLOaAOo ARCHITECTS ~+I ~ NEW NOS ELEVAl70N V5. OLD NORTH ELEVATION - CROSSROADS ~~' BARNES COY ~ , VAIL, COLORADO ARCHITECTS u ~ CROSSROADS VA14 COLORADO SIN (] ~ r VILLAGE INN PLAZA FRONTAGE ROAD ELEVATION COMPARISON Scale : N.T.S NOTE: Frontage Road drops 16'-6"from Crossroads front door to Gateway front door. VAIL PLAZA HOTEL BARNES COY ARCHITECTS ROUNDABOUT! 1. ~An:hit Is ;~, '~~'~., ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~; /( /t ~~ _ -- - - -- -, :: R ~_ - --- --- ~__--_ - -; - 1 t- _. f --- - - /- • , ~~ ^r ~ ~ z ~ e i,~, ~,_ ,: ~ ~ ~ ~il u ~ z~ ~~: - ,tj i fir- ~~ ` ~~~I~l~/" _.. .; _.. ~r- t 1 1 1 ~3 _ ~ (i ~~, ~.__~. ~. 1 1 jl ~ f` 1 1 ~1 ~~~ ` a ,~ . ~, ~.-~ .~~ ,-r,, ~~ ~r~ ~/ ~~`~11~.~ 1. S. ~ ~ /^~ ~~ - - - -- ~._- -- ' ~ ~.U' a I ~ ~:i e ~ r L~~~ .. ~,. ~ ~ ~ ~~ It~,l iK 1- t I ~ju' ' o ~~~ ~~-r.,.- 1 _ ~. __ 1 ~, ' ~n ~ ~- - - ~'~'f I . ~ ! ~ i~, ~ ^r~ ? ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ r ~ u d, r, i~ ~ T_- a-. .+ . ~ - - ~J x ~.c .off- ~. CROSSROAD?~~ ~ j ~_., ~C1;'.y ® c~1,~"e'~'--~-`~~-f-~-~`~ ~ ~`~~ va4 co~oRADo ®;~ '~ T ,/ t _ ~i ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ 4. .~ ~ j ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 1 ^~i-tj~7-- ya ~ ~ ~ ~ '~' ~;~, ,~ ~ `~-~` ~{ {C ~~\~~ .-- ® BARNES COY SUN STUDY SUMMER AND WINTER SOLSl7CE PLAN sow ~,~~ ns ARCHITECTS 1. Archi is ~-- ~~y ~ ~._ ~~ r ~z,~ ~ ~ ,, --'~'~_ . ~ .>' ~~_ r'` - ~ - - __ i - ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, i~ ~~~ a ~m - - ~'%~ ,~ ' ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ '~~ _I. ------ -..._ SOUTH F ~ `- `-'"-- RONTAGE ___--...__._ ....._..-_ ROAD '-_-`---___..... .- :. ~ -~ VILLA ~ --- ~~ i` ~- ' ' ~ "' '~ } ~.. ~ i- _- --_._ -- ~/ \'\\,. ~T \'anu_ INNI LAZA /`\/, (J'I r ~~ ~ _ 1 _'',~ ~~_ ,!I ~ a~.:~~ ~° f ,'Yi'p" ~.. I j I~'~. .__.-- /- .~ GE~ B ~ - \ ~ ~\_y ~~~ ~~ ~ ! ~ '~ -- _'~ ~ ' i ~\ l I ~ , rF Y~T.._ °B~-. JI ll' ~f"^~ 1,~~',~f~..r~ x~ 'Y S~^r ... !-sl! ..r $~ _.. ~~ ~~, __ ~ 1 '~. ~4. r I _ I ~ I ~ ~ it a Ij ~ - ~~e ~ •~ ,` , ~, ,,,.,r ~ ~ , ,F r n ~~ -- z r '1 r ,-. l ~ ~~_ ~ ,I ~ _ ~ .~~ ~ r, dm ,, ,, ~. l ~ ~ < r r b~r, _~ ~ _. ~. ~ ~ _ _ v r ~ -' _- ~ ~ ~ ~ J t C~ b -~ - ~~~ i ~ ~ ~~ - ' Y ~-.~• 1-~ 7/ f %'.~~ \ ,i":-~ ~ I i ~ ' ~'~ i``\ ~~ I.~I ~~ l'' _:!' ;=_ }j'.iC ?~~% /~~ 1~~~ ~--_'• y' r -- ~_T ~'~'~, ~ :r~,,~117 L .!f'~ `~~!~ ~, _ ~ ~ r t ~" ~ _ ~~ ~ ~~ 4 f _ i it t _ ~ a° i ~ t ~~, r it l~ ~ ~ ~ ~,, ~_ ~ ~~~ __ - .- ~u ,~ i ,~, it }-Y ~ ~r ;, ~, a „- __ ~~ ~> ___ ~ ~` ___ ;, ,~ ~ ,~ _:;~ - -- r _ ___ ~G~ } ~~_. }~ EAST MEADOW DRIVE CROSSROADS vA14 coLOaAOo ~' oozy °a r P5~ M p ~: ~ ~~~,_ a BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN historic g~ gARN ES COY and ARCHITECTS ®r ;,. 1. • Archt Ls ~, ,~ ..t>, _ ~~ ~ __ II _.._ . , ~ ~ _.~ m __ - _~ =- f_;' _ _ ' - ~ ! ; I r r I - _- `9g `\; \I -. r - _ _ -. ~--.'rYZZ -_ -.. \ --- SOUTH T _ ~ --- --- -.. t-Q ~ '~ -- .. i ~ ~ ~ ~ a\ f - \ ,l .. ~ .~-.: -_ _ ~ E ROAD - "1--,- rl ~ r- ~i ~ ~ - _ - - _ ~ _ __ j 1 \ // L. _ _ _L __ ''~-~. TM's.--~, ~1 t + _ ~ -~ ~- ~ ___ / -~ /lttAGE INN P _ - - .:._ __ -- ~k ,~T ~ :; "? f, !>a„ -~ ,; ~_ ~ _ _ ~-~ ~ ! ~r ~ - ~ i F l -r_~ t ~ a h .. 1 \/ ' V 1 G ~ --_ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~'~1 -- 1 ~~,~ -! + j i ~ ~ ~ !~ ~ ~y _ -_ .._ ~».~~ b~ ~ ,, ~ _ ~ _, _, ,~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ 8 i I~ ~ i ~ ~_L. ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~~? i a _ ;"a i ~ ~ "'- 1° ~~`l ~ ~ - - ~ ~° ° "1 1 i •, ~- ! ~ ~ ~ ~ r - ~ ~_ ~ ~ li i ~ ! f! ~~ i ~ ~ J ~ ~~~ I J - ~ r- ____ - ; - ~i _ _ ~ /~ t ~,~ ~ ~~ ,~ I ~ / /~ 7. ` // / - _ ~,.a - ~ ~ , ~ 71~ ___; ~~ I 1 ~ L t l --- ~- - --... ~ ! ~$1c ' l - ~ FI (~ '. "~I 1 I ' ~I --- t t ~ i ~ ~ ~~~ '~ 1~'~ ~_ i ~~ _ ~~ ~ .. _ .. {/ _.. ~, ~ I I -' J ~~ ~ ! _; { ;, `~~ - i'' .. T' y~ / .~(\ ;. ~ -i \ ` 11 ~ \ ~ ~ ^ ~~ t ~ 7 !~ / I( \\ .r . ~ . , ~ ~. ~- - ~ , a ~ '~ ~ _ ~~ , /~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ! . l1 .~ ., ~ '-1 ,~_ r ~'y,' pis ' N ' - l* ,,,,~; ~ l! 1 ' -~_ 4."--~-~~_~ '~ (~~~ ~ \ r ~i--.fie.- ~` ~J -~= \~q ".. _ °\\ m^ -.. ,! ( T MEA OW DRIVE ^,~ .. s -.~,~ ~~ ~ !~ -..- ~~ ~~ ~ SZ Pty` / ~/~)J +~ m . _.~.»,R~„ -::+ _: ~ ~,~~c u:~~=.~_-~._-._ .-;.r~ ., ti-,._'.~ ... / -/ ~--'~.~ J ,? _ ~._ r '~-~"'- ~ (/ ~- - - , ~ ~ , fir' ~..,. 2. I .. - .. - ~..a:.• T P~ CROSSROADS BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN (ac4wl g2de_ BARN VA14 eOLORADO xe. ~ ma ' ARCHITECTS ~ ARn+~ ~ }W-~ I ,- ~ ~ ; _ _ ~-- - _i -,,, F ~, ~, , ~, ., Jj ~, .. ~ ~; } ~ 'Y I _.. ~ _ c1 ' _ v ~_ ~~~ ~ l = _ 1, ~~ ; t i `; - ~ ~ ' ~~ ~~ v~ ` '~ ~' ~, ~ ~-- ~ ^`' ` _ ~ ~ 4 ~~ '~ i • ,~ _ _ ~ _: _ -, ~~ _I ~ ~, ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ;,- ,.~ , ~- ~ - ,. I ~~ \ ~'~ ~ 1 .~ I ~\ _~-~' I ~ ~ \ ~ I I i ~ ' i - ~ i ~ ~ / ~ ~ I~ i 6- I I I ~ -_ _ , I I ~ I r ~:: _~ ~ I ~ .~- ._~ ~ ~ I ~, -- ~. r ~ ~ `t . ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ - --~--- -' ' ~~ __ I - ~ ~ ~ ' -' I // ,I ~,~z: .-_ ~ i1_ ~I __, .. ~- - ~' - s ~ ~i ~~-; ~ ~ II ~~ ^ ,~ ,. '~I ~, ~ ,. G i ~,t *, ~~~. ~ ,~. _ - _ _. ~ 7! I ~~~ I ~ ~ i ~.,. ~; i~ ~, i t_' II ~ _ I _~ ~- i i ~ ~i it ~~ ~ ~i, ~ , ~. ~ .{ ~~ i I ~, O .. ~' 00 ~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ '~ „ ~ ~ 1 ~. __P_ - rr it C,~C ~. ~ ~~ ~~ V AJ -- II- ~~_ - ~-- - ~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ___ _. ._- __- --rrr--~i7-...»:.r:FV .~,, .~ r ;3211 ~~ i~ l1 ~~ vrU~'~,~!..:%y" ~~. !s,` sa _- ~ EAST MEADOW DRIVE G~ ~~~~ ,. _ - __ ~, -- _. ~; ~ ~~ --- ~ ,-~,..~'~'-1 ~ ~ ~'~ '1 ~ II ----, '~ •. .. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ -,~: - - - - r -- B ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ / II III Ij ~ / ~ I ~ JN PLAZA '~~ ~i i ~ _ i \i-. ~ I v I ~ Ili .~I ~II ~ ~ B ~ ,! !' >~ i~ 'i`. ~-_=~ ~~ .< '~.__ ', -- ~~ ~' r ~: ~~~ ~~ ~ <' CROSSROADS VAIL. COLORADO ~~ ~- -- ; B ~ - -- - B ~ -- , ~, y I ., -- 1 r --- it I I B - ,.. ------ I J -- .. --- ,~ ~--- -- --- ., Y, II ~ I ~ ~ I ,. -- --- - ~ , ~_ _ ,, - ~' ~ --- ,, I. - ~ ~ I ~_ r ~ - --° ._ , _ ~ ,s-:,. .. I ''1 ~ , ; ~ ~ ?~ r .' - - w. S ~, ~ - ~. ~ - - I i~ . `w I:~._ .,~~-~ .~ I i ~~~ ~~ i ~~ ~ ~ _:. /~'1 -- i I ~ ~. ,- a _ , ~ - - `\ ,- '1~ :~ - -_ - .:1 -~ , D s~ ~ ,, , ,, ~ ~ ~ ', ~ ~ `~ ,~ - I ~I ~-. ~ i .,: ~~. ,. ,~~ --, ~ Y - ~~E ~~ C'- 1 ----- i ~i ~ ,_, ~ ,, ~ - ,~. BUILDING DIAGRAM (Extent of Building Beyond 20' Setback) BARNES COY ~ , Scale : r• = to-o" ARCHITECTS ,~~<.~.,~cytc~ One stay dotlc structure wM~n 20' set back Buildable area out of setback MPRCM Je' ""' ~~ ~-~~~ 5 • r • V V V ~1 i i i B i __ ~ it ... ~~. ~ , . ._..... ,._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~' ~~ ~ __ __ _ ~ ~ i ~ ______ it ~ "~" Y - ~ __ _ ~ , ~ i ~ ~~ ... „ . _ _____ I f4 ~f~. i - - ~% ~ ~ .: ~~: I~ I - - ~ J ~. __ ~ I~ ~ S i /, - ., I ~.. .. ~ ~,. _ ~ ~ 1 y ~y_-_ 4~ ~R ._ , '1 .,. i ' , ; .. -- - , ,, . .:: _... r }~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,. -- -- -- -- - --- ~. _ . . .,.., BARNES COY ~ ARCHITECTS nrcn;cgtu MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 25, 2005 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposal to establish Special Development District No. 39 (Crossroads), pursuant to Article 12-9(A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of Crossroads, a mixed use development; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-2=2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, pursuantto Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add a definition for bowling alley; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuantto Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add bowling alleys as a conditional use; and requests for conditional use permits to allow for the construction of an outdoor operation of the accessory uses as set forth in Section 12-7E-5 (ice skating rink); a major arcade to include indoor entertainment; a theater, meeting rooms, and convention facilities; multiple-family dwellings and lodges; and a private club to allow for the establishment of a for sale parking club, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Vail Town Code, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Crossroads East One, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Warren Campbell I. SUMMARY The applicant, Crossroads East One, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC, is requesting a recommendation from the Planning and Environmental Commission to the Vail Town Council regarding a development application to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, pursuant to Article 12-9(A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of Crossroads, a mixed use development; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3- 7, Amendment, to add a definition for bowling alley; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add bowling alleys as a conditional use; and requests for conditional use permits to allow for the construction of an outdoor operation of the accessory uses as set forth in Section 12-7E-5 (ice skating rink); a major arcade to include indoor entertainment; a theater, meeting rooms, and convention facilities; multiple-family dwellings and lodges; and a private club to allow for the establishment of a for sale parking club, pursuant to Section 12- 7E-4, Vail Town Code, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1. Upon review of the applicable elements of the Town's planning documents and adopted criteria for review, the Community Development Department is recommending the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval with conditions of the applicant's request to the Vail Town Council. A complete summary of our review is provided in Section VIII of this memorandum. Attachment: C a II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Crossroads East One, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC, is requesting a recommendation from the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission to the Vail Town Council of a development application to establish SpE:cial Development District No. 39, Crossroads, to allow for the redevelopment of the Crossroads site. The establishment of Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, is intended to facilitate the redevelopment of Crossroads, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1. A vicinity map has been attached for reference (Attachment A). The applicant is .proposing to remove the existing improvements on the site and construct a new structure and public plaza. According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, the proposed development site is located in the Commercial Service Center (CSC) zone district. As such, development on the site shall be governed by the regulations outlined in Article 7E, Commercial Service Center (CSC) District, Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. The key elements of the proposal made since the Commission last saw the proposal on December 13, 2004, include: • The reduction of the number of dwelling units from 76 to 75 and the incorporatie~n of eight (8) lock-offs. A proposed deviation from the allowable numberof dwelling units (47}which is 28 dwelling units greater; • Proposed $1.1 Million in public art; • A reduction in the proposed Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) from 219,000 square feet to 210,054 square feet. A proposed deviation from the allowable amount of GRFA (46,051 sq. ft.) which is 164,003 sq. ft. greater; • A reduction in the proposed building height at its peak from 107.5 feet to 99.9 feet with additional reductions in height ranging from 16 to 28 feet. The reduction of one floor plate of the building; • Provision for employee housing units located off-site to accommodate the net increase in employees generated by this redevelopment; • Elimination of setback encroachments along the west property line except for the one-story portion of the building containing the enclosed loading and delivery facility and other architectural changes to the west elevation. • The elimination of all subterranean encroachments into the Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive right-of-ways and the removal of subterranean improvements within a minimum of 10 feet of the west property line to preserve existing trees; • The establishment of the extension of the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan by creating a plan and installing streetscape improvements for the intersections of Meadow Drive and Village Center Road and Meadow Drive and Willow Bridge F;oad and the South Frontage Road; • 338 subsurface parking spaces (92 in excess of Town Code); • A 3 screen movie theater with stadium seating accessed at the pedestrian level of the proposed public plaza; • A 10 lane bowling alley and sports bar/night club/family arcade accessed ai: the pedestrian level of the proposed public plaza ; • An outdoor ice skating rink for public skating in winter/water-recreation feature (pop- jet fountain) in the spring and summer months; .~ .. h • A public plaza of 24,130 square feet at the intersection of Willow Bridge Road and Meadow Drive (Approximately 40,000 sq. ft. including East Meadow Drive and Willow Bridge Road public right-of-ways) for public gatherings and events; • Public restrooms at the pedestrian level and within the lower level of the parking garage; • The incorporation of a covered bus stop on the southwest corner of the building; • 61,596 square feet of new retail and restaurant space at the pedestrian level and one floor above surrounding the public plaza; • Potential reduction of skier parking from South Frontage Road on busy days by allowing use of.Crossroads parking facility; • Establishment of an enclosed 5 berth loading and delivery facility with access from the South Frontage Road which will be made available for public use; • Reduction in the width of the building located at a zero setback in the southwest corner of the site from 52 feet to 44 feet along East Meadow Drive; • Changes to the architecture and height were made to the northwest and northeast portions of the building; • The addition of a roof feature which wraps around the loading and delivery bay on the northwest corner. The addition of an awning on the west elevation over the pedestrian access proposed to connect the public plaza and Vail Village Inn Phase III; and • A greater detailed design for the two commercial floors of the project. Details of the design will be worked out with the Design Review Board. In conjunction with the requested establishment of a new SDD, the applicant is requesting a text amendment to the zoning regulations and multiple conditional use permits. The specifics of those requests are identified below: A request for a text amendment to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add a definition for "bowling alley". A request for a text amendment to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add bowling alley as a conditional use. Requests for conditional use permits to allow for the construction of an outdoor operation under the accessory uses as set forth in Section 12-7E-5 (ice skating rink/pop-jet fountain); a major arcade to include indoor entertainment; a theater, meeting rooms, multiple-family dwellings and lodges; and a private club to allow for the establishment of a for sale parking club, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Vail Town Code. A reduced copy of the floor plans and elevations have been attached for reference (Attachment B). Pursuant to Section 12-9A-9, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, the applicant is requesting deviations from the prescribed development standards for building height, density (number of units), Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA), additional bulk and mass in required setbacks, site coverage, and landscape area. r _, III. BACKGROUND • This property was annexed into the Town of Vail by Court order on August 26, 1966, as a part of the Original Town of Vail. • The existing Crossroads was developed in the 1970's as a mixed use development which has changed little since. • The Crossroads property is one of three properties zoned Commercial Service Center. The other two properties are the Gateway Building and the WestStar Bank Building, both of which are Special Development Districts. • On September 7, 2004, the Town Council granted unanimous approval for 'the applicant to proceed through the development review process.. Several members expressed concern over the extent of the encroachments into the right-of-way (all right-of-way encroachments have since been eliminated from the plans, with 1rhe exception of landscape/streetscape improvements). • On September 13, 2004, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public work session with the applicant. At that meeting, the applicant gave a presentation which generally discussed the project goals and objectives. The Commisslion generally expressed support. However, it was identified that there were some issues to be resolved. • On October 6 and 20, 2004, the Design Review Board held a conceptual review meeting with the applicant. At that meeting, the applicant gave a presentation which generally discussed the project goals and objectives. The Board gener~~lly expressed support for the project. However, it was identified that there were issues and concerns to be addressed regarding the materials and architecture. • On October 25, 2004, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a put~lic work session with the applicant. At that meeting the applicant gave a presentation which generally discussed the project goals and objectives. The Commission generally expressed support for the project. However, it was identified by i:he Planning and Environmental Commission that there were issues to be resolved such as the height of the building along the western property line. Staff identified height in the southwest corner, landscaping, setback encroachments, right-of-way encroachments, mechanical venting, and the retail design as concerns. • On November 8, 2004, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed and tabled the proposal. In general, concerns were expressed about the scale of i:he structure and iri particular the heights of the structure along the western property line. Several members expressed satisfaction regarding the mix of uses and the ability of the retail and public space to create an activity center in the heart of Town. • On December 13, 2004, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwardecj a recommendation of denial to the Town Council regarding the adoption of SDD No. 39. The Commission cited encroachments into setback, height, and the lack of relationship in terms of bulk and mass of the proposed structure to surrounding buildings. • On January 18, 2005, the Town Council reviewed the application and identified concerns with bulk, mass, encroachments into the Town right-of-way, relationship to neighboring properties, height, and public benefits. • On February 1, 2005, the Town Council remanded the application for SDD No. 39 back to the Planning and Environmental Commission for review of an amended application which addressed the issues identified by the DRB, PEC, and Town Council. 4 IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BOARDS A. Special Development District Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the PEC for impacts of use/development, then by the DRB for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning, and final approval by the Town Council. Planning and Environmental Commission: The PEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the Town Council based upon the findings made on the criteria located in Chapter 12-9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code. Design Review Board: The DRB has no review authority on a SDD proposal, but must review any accompanying DRB application. The DRB review of an SDD prior to Town Council approval is purely advisory in nature. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: The Town Council takes into consideration the PEC's recommendation when reviewing an application for a special development district and is responsible for final approval/denial of an SDD. The Town Council shall review the proposal and approve/approve with conditions/deny the application based upon the findings made on the criteria located in Chapter 12-9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code. B. Conditional Use Permit Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the PEC for acceptability of use and then by the DRB for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: The PEC is responsible for final approval/denial of CUP. The Commission's decision to approve/approve with conditions/deny a conditional use permit are based upon the criteria found in Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code and conformance of the proposal with the zone district in which it is located. _Design Review Board: The DRB has no review authority on a CUP, but must review any accompanying DRB application. 5 a Town Council: Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, anti a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. C. Text Amendment Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the PEC for acceptability of use and then by the DRB for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: The PEC shall review the proposal for and make a recommendation to the Town Council) on the compatibility of the proposed text changes for consistency with the Vail Comprehen~;ive Plans and impact on the general welfare of the community. Design Review Board: The DRB has no review authority on code amendments. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided. The staff advises the applicant as to compliance with the Zoning Regulations. Staff provides analyses and recommendations to the PEC and Town Council on any text proposal. Town Council: The Town Council shall review and approve the proposal based on the compatibility of the proposed text changes for consistency with the Vail Comprehensive Plans and impact on the general welfare of the community. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Land Use Plan The Vail Land Use Plan was adopted by the Vail Town Council on November 18, 1986. The plan is intended to serve as a basis from which future decisions may be made regarding land use within the valley. The primary focus of the Vail Land Use Plan is to address the long-term needs and desires of the Town as it matures. l"he Town of Vail has evolved from a small ski resort founded in 1962 with approximately 1 190,000 annual skier visits and virtually no permanent residents to a community with 4,500 permanent residents. The Town is faced with the challenge of creatively accommodating the increase in permanent residency as well as the increase in skier visits, while preserving the important qualities that have made Vail successful. This is a considerable challenge, given the fact that land within the Valley is awell-defined finite resource, with much of the land already developed at this juncture. The Vail Land Use Plan was undertaken with the goal of addressing this challenge in mind. A secondary purpose of the Vail Land Use Plan was to analyze a series of properties owned by the Town of Vail, to determine their suitability for various types of community facilities. The goals articulated in the plan reflect the desires of the citizenry. The goal statements that were developed reflect a general consensus of the comments shared at public meetings. The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to be used as the Town's adopted policy guidelines in the review process for new development proposals. Staff has reviewed the Vail Land Use Plan and the goal statements that staff believes are applicable appear Section VIII under staffs review of Criterion D. According to the Official Town of Vail Land Use Plan map, the applicant's proposed redevelopment site is located with the "Vail Village Master Plan"land use category. Pursuant to the Plan, the "Vail Village Master Plan"land use category description, "Vail Village has been designated separately as a mixed use area and accounfs for 77 acres or about 2 % of the Plan area. This area has not been analyzed in this Plan document because the Vail Village Master Plan study addressed this area specifically in more detail." Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan The Town of Vail is in the process of preparing a revision to the adopted Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan. The original Master Plan is an outgrowth of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. The Guide Plan was created in 1982 to give guidance to the overall physical development for the Village. In addition to providing broad design guidelines, the Guide Plan suggested specific physical improvements for the Village. Improvements such as new plazas, new landscape area, etc. Along with the construction of these public improvements included proposals to complete numerous private sector improvements. Improvements such as building additions outdoor deck expansions, and facade improvements. The Streetscape Master Plan was written in part to provide clear design direction for coordinated public/private improvements. According to the Master Plan, the purpose of the plan is to provide a comprehensive and coordinated conceptual design for streetscape improvements that: 1. is supported by the community; 2. enriches the aesthetic appearance of the Town; and 3. emphasizes the importance of craftsmanship and creative design in order to create an excellent pedestrian experience. 7 r Vail Village Master Plan The Vail Village Master Plan is based on the premise that the Village can be planned <~nd designed as a whole. It is intended to guide the Town in developing land use laws <~nd policies for coordinating development by the public and private sectors in Vail Village and in implementing community goals for public improvements. It is intended to result; in ordinances and policies that will preserve and improve the unified and attractive appearance of Vail Village. Most importantly, this Master Plan shall serve as a guide to the staff, review boards, and Town Council in analyzing future proposals for development in Vail Village ~~nd in legislating effective ordinances to deal with such development. Furthermore, the Master Plan provides a clearly stated set of goals and objectives outlining how the Village will grow in the future. The Vail Village Master Plan is intended to be consistent with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and along with the Guide Plan, it underscores the importance of the relationship between the built environment and public spaces. Goals for Vail Village are summarized in six major goal statements. While,there is a certain amount of overlap between these six goals, each focuses on a particular aspect of the Village and the community as a whole. The goal statements are designed to establishh a framework, or direction, for the future growth of the Village. A series of objectives outline specific steps that can betaken toward achieving each stated goal. Policy statements have been developed to guide the Town's decision-making in achieving each of the stated objectives, whether it be through the review of private sector development proposals or in implementing capital improvement projects. The Vail Village Master Plan's objectives and policy statements address key issues relai:ive to growth and development. These statements establish much of the context within which future development proposals are evaluated. In implementing the Plan, the objectives ~~nd policies are used in conjunction with a number of graphic planning elements that togetlher comprise this Plan. While the objectives and policies establish a general framework, the graphic plans provide more specific direction regarding public improvements or development potential on a particular piece of property. The Vail Village Master Plan is intended to serve as a guide to the stafi~, review boards and Town Council in analyzing future proposals for development in Vail Village and in legislating effective ordinances to deal with such development. The most significant elements of 'the Master Plan are the goals, objectives, policies and action steps. They are the working tools of the Master Plan. They establish the broad framework and vision, but also layout 'the specific policies and action steps that will be used to implement the Plan. As noted on page 35 of the Master Plan, "It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for those proposals that can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan." Staff believes this statement re-emphasizes that the Master Plan is a general document providing advisory guidelines to aid the Town in analyzing development proposals and that full compliance is not required in order for a project to be approved. The stated goals of the Vail Village Master Plan which staff believes are applicable to this s w application appear in Section VIII under staffs assessment of Criterion D. Specific Sub- Area Details found in the Vail Village Master Plan Mixed Use Sub Area (#1) The Mixed-Use sub-area is a prominent activity center for Vail Village. It .is distinguished from the Village core by the larger scale buildings and by the limited auto traffic along East Meadow Drive. Comprised of five major development projects, this sub-area is characterized by a mixture of residential/lodging and commercial activity. There is a great deal of potential for improvements to both public and private facilities in the area. Among these is the opportunity to develop gateway entries to the Village at the 4-way stop and at the intersection of Vail Road and Meadow Drive. It is also a long term goal to strengthen the connection between this area and the Village core area byreinforcing the established pedestrian linkages. Pedestrianization in this area may. benefit from the development of retail infill with .associated pedestrian improvements along East Meadow Drive and the development of public access to Gore Creek. A significant increase in the Village's overnight bed base will occur in this sub-area with the development of the final phase of the Vail Village Inn project. In, addition, commercial and residential/lodging development potential is identified in sub-area concepts 3, 4, 6, and 8. The completion of these projects will essentially leave the sub-area "built out" #1-6 Crossroads Intill Commercial infill over new underground parking lot in conjunction with a large public plaza with greenspace area (existing and new parking demand to be provided on site). While configuration of infill may be done a number of ways, it is the overall intent to replace existing surface parking with pedestrian corridors into a commercial area, as well as to provide a strong building edge on Meadow Drive and streetscape improvements. Improvements of the planted buffer adjacent to the Frontage Road is also important. Relocation of the loading and delivery functions and entry to parking structure is strongly encouraged to reduce traffic on Meadow Drive. Potential to improve fire access also exists in the redevelopment scheme. Special emphasis of 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1, 6.1, and 6.2. Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-around economic health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. Objective 2.4: Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity where compatible with existing land uses. Policy 2.4.1: Commercial infill development consistent with established horizontal zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provide activitygenerators, accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and streetscape improvements to the pedestrian network throughout the Village. r Policy 2.4.2: Activity that provides night life and evening entertainment for both the guest and the community shall be encouraged. Objective 2.5: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. Policy 2.5.1: Recreation amenities, common areas, meei`ing facilities and other amenities shall be preserved ~~nd enhanced as a part of any redevelopment of .lodging properties. Policy 2.5.2: The Town will use the maximum flexibility possible in the interpretation of building and fire code:> in order to facilitate building renovations without compromising life, health, and safety considerations. Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of the private sector. . Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part. of any new or redeveloped project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning. Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed vvith appropriate restrictions so as to insure their availability ~-nd affordability to the local work force. Policy 2.6.3: The Town of Vail may facilitate in the development of affordable housing by providing limited assistance. Goal #3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience throughout the Village. Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas), along adjacenf pedestrian ways. Policy 3.1.2: Public art shall be encouraged at appropriate locations throughout Town. Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be encouraged throughout the Towr- in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public areas. 10 Goal #4: To preserve existing open space areas and expand greenspace opportunities. Objective 4.1: Improve existing open space areas and create new plazas with greenspaces and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each type pf open space in forming the overall fabric of the Village. Policy 4.1.1: Active recreation facilities shall be preserved (or relocated to accessible locations elsewhere in the Village) in any development or redevelopment of property in Vail Village. Policy 4.1.2: The development of new public plazas, and improvement to existing plazas (public art, streetscape features, seating areas, etc.), shall be strongly encouraged to reinforce their roles as attractive people places. Policy 4.1.3: With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural open space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout Vail Village shall be preserved as open space. Policy 4.1.4: Open space improvements including the addition of accessible greenspace as described or graphically shown in the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Urban Design Guide Plan, will be required in conjunction with private infill or redevelopment projects. Goal #5: Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulation system throughout the Village. Objective 5.1: Meet parking demands with public and private parking facilities. Policy 5.1.1:. For new development that is located outside the Commercial Core 1 Zone District, on-site parking shall be provided (rather than paying into the parking fund) to meet any additional parking demand. as required by the zoning code. Policy 5.1.2: The expansion of the Vail Village parking structure shall maximize the number of additional parking spaces available for public parking. Policy 5.1.3: Seek locations for additional structured public and private parking. Policy 5.1.4: Confinue to promote the lease parking program as a means for maximizing the utilization of private parking spaces. 11 Policy 5.1.5: Redevelopment. projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide underground or visually concealed parking. Goal #6: To ensure the continued improvement of the vital operatic>nal elements of the Village. Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing <~nd new development. Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of 1`ire, police and public utilities within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting. Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall be reviewed by respective Town Departments to identify both the impacts of the proposal and potential mitigating measures. Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decora~Five paving, open dining decks, etc.), maybe permitted on Town of Vail land orright-of--way (with review and approval by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission when applicable) provided that Town operations such as snow removal, street maintenance and fire department access and operation are able to be maintained at current levels. Special design (i. e. heated pavement), maintenance fees, or other considerations may be required to ofi`set impacts on Town services. #1-7 Village Center Road Improvements Redesign of intersection as shown on the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. Goal of this project is to create a visual landscape barrier to prevent unnecessary vehicular traffic. Bus, delivery and pedestrian traffic must a~/so be accommodated in this design. Special emphasis on 3.1, 3.2, 5.3, 5.4'. Goal #3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience throughout the Village. Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping; lighting and seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways. Policy 3.1.2: Public art shall be encouraged at appropriate locations throughout Town. 12 Policy 3.1.3:• Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public areas. Objective 3.2: Minimize the amount of vehicular traffic in the Village to the greatest extent possible. Policy 3.2.1: Vehicular traffic will be eliminated or reduced to the absolute minimal necessary levels in the pedestrianized areas of the Village. Goal #5: Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulation system throughout the Village. Objective 5.3: Concentrate the majority of interconnecting transif activity at the periphery of fhe Village to minimize vehicular traffic in pedestrianized areas. Policy 5.3.1: The Vail Transportation Center shall be the primary pick up and drop off point for public transit and private shuttle vans and taxis. Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape of circulation corridors throughout the Village. Policy 5.4:1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Division of Highways toward fhe implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South Frontage Road. Policy 5.4.2: Medians and right-of--ways shall be landscaped. Vail Village Design Considerations The Town of Vail adopted the Vail Village Design Considerations in 1980. The Design Considerations were revised in 1993. The Design Considerations are considered an integral part of the Vail Village Urban Design Plan. The Design Considerations are intended to: . guide growth and change in ways that will enhance and preserve the essential qualities of the Village; and • serve as design guidelines instead of rigid rules of development; and • help influence the form and design of buildings. The Vail Village Design Considerations are divided into two categories (urban design considerations and architectural/landscape considerations): URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS These considerations relate to general, large-scale land use planning issues, as well as form considerations which affect more than one property or even 13 whole areas. These considerations are primarily the purview of the Planning and Environmental Commission. The considerations include focuses on pedestrianization, vehicle penetration, streetscape framework, street enclosure, street edge, building height, views and focal points, service and delivery, and sun/shade. The specifics of these considerations are addressed by staff in Section VIII under Criterion D. Town of Vail Zonina Reaulations Staff has reviewed the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations (Title 12, Vail Town Code). 'We believe the following code sections are relevant to the review of the applicant's request: Article E. Commercial Service Center (CSC) District (in part) 12-7E-1: Purpose: The Commercial Service Center District is intended to provide sites for general shopping and commercial facilities serving the Town, together with limited multiple-family dwelling and lodge uses as may be appropriate without interfering with the basic commercial functions of the District. The Commercial Service Center District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to permitted types of buildings and uses, and to maintain a convenient shopping center environment for permitted commercial uses. 12-7E-3: Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in the CSC District: Banks and financial institutions. Eating and drinking establishments, including the following: Bakeries and delicatessens with food service. Cocktail lounges, taverns, and bars. Coffee shops. Fountains and sandwich shops. Restaurants. Personal services and repair shops, including the following: Barbershops. Beauty shops. Business and office services. Cleaning and laundry pick up agencies without bulk cleaning or dyeing. Coin operated orself-service laundries. Small appliance repair shops, excluding furniture repair. Tailors and dressmakers. Travel and ticket agencies. Professional offices, business offices, and studios. Retail stores and establishments without limit as to floor area including the following: Apparel stores. Art supply stores and galleries. Bakeries and confectioneries, including preparation of products for sale on the premises. Bookstores. Building materials stores without outdoor storage. 14 Camera stores and photographic studios. Candy stores. Chinaware and glassware stores. Delicatessens and specialty food stores. Department and general merchandise stores. Drugstores and pharmacies. Florists. Food stores. Furniture stores. Gift stores. Hardware stores. Hobby stores. Household appliance stores. Jewelry stores. Leather goods stores. Liquor stores. Luggage stores. Music and record stores. Newsstands and Tobacco stores.' Pet shops. Photographic studios. Radio and television broadcasting studios. Radio and television stores and repair shops. Sporting goods stores. Stationery stores. Supermarkets. Toy stores. Variety stores. Yardage and dry goods stores. Additional offices, businesses, or services determined to be similar to permitted uses in accordance with the provisions of section 12-7E-2 of this article. 12-7E-4: Conditional Uses: The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the CSC district, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 16 of this title: Any use permitted by section 12-7E-3 of this article, which is not conducted entirely within a building. Bed and breakfast as further regulated by section 12-14-18 of this title.. Brew pubs. Child daycare center. Commercial laundry and cleaning services. Dog kennel. Major arcade. Multiple-family dwellings and lodges. Outdoor operation of the accessory uses as set forth in section 12-7E-5 of this article. Private clubs. Public buildings, grounds and facilities. 15 Public park and recreation facilities. Public utility and public service uses. Ski lifts and tows. Theaters, meetings rooms, and convention facilities. Type 111 employee housing units (EHU) as provided in chapter 13 of this title. 12-7E-5: Accessory Uses: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the CSC district: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of section 12-14-12 of this title. Minor arcade. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios, or other recreation facilities customarily incidental to conditional residential or lodge uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12-7E-7: Setbacks: In the CSC district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20), the minimum side setback shall be twenty feet (20), and the minimum rear setback shall be twenty feet (20). 12-7E-8: Height: For a flat or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty five feet (35). For a sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty eight feet (38). 12-7E-9: Density Control: Not more than forty (40) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRF.A) shall be permitted for each- one hundred (100) square feet of buildable site area, and gross residential floor area shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of total building floor area on any site. Total density shall not exceed eighteen (18) dwelling units per acre of buildable site area. A dwelling unit in amultiple-family building may include one attached accommodation unit no larger than one-third (1/3) of the total floor area of the dwelling. 12-7E-10: Site Coverage: Site coverage shall not exceed seventy five percent (75%) of the total site area. 12-7E-11: Landscaping and Site Development: At least twenty percent (20%) of the total site shall be landscaped. The minimum width and length of any area qualifying as landscaping shall be fifteen feet (15) with a minimum area not less than three hundred (300) square feet. 16 12-7E-12: Parking and Loading: Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this title. At least one-half (1/2) of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings. No parking or loading area shall be located in any required front setback area. 12-7E-13: Location of Business Actrivity: A. Limitations; Exception: All permitted and conditional uses by sections 12-7E-3 and 12- 7E-4 of this article, shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building except for permitted parking and loading areas and such activities as may be specifically authorized to be unenclosed by a conditional use permit and the outdoor display of goods. B. Outdoor Display: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by outdoor display. Article 12-9A: Special Development (SDD) District (in part) Section 12-9A-1: Purpose: The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the town: to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities: to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail comprehensive plan. An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the special development district. The special development district does not apply to and is not available in the following zone districts: Hillside residential, single-family, duplex, primary/secondary. The elements of the development plan shall be as outlined in section 12-9A-6 of this article. Chapter 12-16: Conditional Uses Permits (in part) Section 12-16-1: Purpose; Limitations In order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect fo their effects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be' permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied. 17 1 VI. ZONING ANALYSIS According to the application information provided by the applicant, staff has performed an analysis of the proposal in relation to the requirements of the Vail Code. The deviations to the prescribed development standards are shown in bold text in the table below. Zoning: Commercial Service Center Land Use Plan Designation: Vail Village Master Plan Study Area (High Density Residential/Mixed Use) Current Land Use: Mixed Use/Residential Development Standard Allowed Proposed Lot Area: 20,000 sq. ft. 115,129 sq. ft. (2.643 acres) Buildable Area: 115,129 sq. ft. Setbacks: Front (Frontage Road): 20' 0' to 19' West Side: 20' 2' (loading dock) to 25' East Side: 20' 0' to 25' Front (Meadow Drive): 20' 0' to 150' Building Height: 38' 99.9 ft. Density: 18 units/acre 28.4 units /acre 47.5 D.U.s 75 D.U.s GRFA: 46,051.6 sq. ft. 210,054 sq. ft. (40%) (182%) Site Coverage: 86,346.8 sq. ft. 107,772 sq. ft. (75%) (93.6%) Landscape Area: Total 23,025.8 sq. ft. 42,255 sq. ft. (20% total site) (36.7% total site) Minimum Softscape of total permitted 18,420.6 sq. ft. 14,898 sq. ft. (80%) (35.3%) Maximum Hardscape of total permitted 4,605.1 sq. ft. 27,357 sq. ft. (20%) (64.7%) Parking: 246 spaces 338 spaces (92 surplus spaces proposed to be in private parking club) BOLD indicates deviations from the prescribed development standards. 18 VII. Vlll. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zoning North: CDOT ROW None South: Mixed Use Commercial Core II District/Public Accommodation East: Public Parking General Use District West: Mixed Use SDD No. 6 THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT AND REVIEW PROCESS Chapter 12-9 of the Town Code provides for the establishment of special development districts in the Town of Vail. According to Section 12-9A-1, the purpose of a special development district is, "To encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land, in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development within the Town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Special Development District, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district; shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the Special Development District." An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses, and activities of the special development district. The development plan shall contain all relevant material and information necessary to establish the parameters to which the special development district shall adhere. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to: the approved site plan; floor plans, building sections, and elevations: vicinity plan; parking plan; preliminary open space/landscape plan; densities; and permitted, conditional, and accessory uses. The determination of permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council as part of the formal review of the proposed development plan. Unless further restricted through the review of the proposed special development district, permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be limited to those permitted, conditional and accessory uses in the property's underlying zone district. The Town Code provides nine design criteria which shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating the merits of the proposed special development district. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. The following is a staff analysis of the project's compliance with the nine SDD review criteria: ~s A. Consideration of Factors Regarding Special Development Districts: A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environrr~ent, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. The Crossroads development site is located along the north. side of East Meadow Drive across from Village Center. An attached vicinity map has been provided for. reference (Attachment A). The development site is adjoined on the north by the' South Frontage Road, on the east by Village Center Road and the Vail Village Parking Structure, on the south by East Meadow Drive and Village Center, and to the west by Vail Village Inn Phase III. All of these surrounding properties have different zoning designations and thus must comply v~rith differing development standards. Although the neighboring properties must adhere to different zoning requirements, 1the buildings constructed on the neighboring properties are all two to seven story tall buildings. According to research of Town files, the surrounding properties have varying building heights. For instance, the new One Willow Bridge project (Swiss Chalet) will be 50 feet tall, and the Vail Village Inn Phase III varies in height from 68 feet along the Frontage Road to 25 feet along East Meadow Drive. The applicant is proposing heights of 93 feet (historic grade)/87.5 feet (finished grade) along the Frontage Road and 63.3 feet (historic grade)~'56 feet (finished grade) on the portion of the building located in the southwest corner of i:he property along East Meadow Drive. The proposed heights of the structure along the western property line range from 84 to 63 feet (historic grade)/79 feet to 56 feet (finished grade). Z~he tallest point on the structure is 99.9 feet above historic grade on the southern end of 1:he main ridge above the entry to the building. Since the January 18,.2005, Council meeting the applicant has reduced the proposed pii:ch of many of the roofs on the structure which had the effect of lowering many portions of the building by four (4) feet or more. In selected areas the reduction has been much greater, between 12 and 28 feet, as is the case along the western property line. Please see the sheets provided in the attached plans which depict the lowering of the structure. Staff believes that the proposed height will set a new precedence as it will be taller than any building in Town. However, staff believes that the deviation in height is offset by the development potential lost by proposing a 24,130 square foot public plaza .(Vail Village Master Plan recommends a public plaza in this location) and the other public benefits. In order to assess whether or not the deviations proposed by the project are outweighed by the benefits staff performed an analysis which took the area of the plaza and multiplied it by the allowable GRFA factor (40%). The allowable amount of GRFA was then multiplied by the Vail Village Master Plans maximum number of stories (3-4 stories). Staff selectee a factor of 3.5 stories to multiply the developable plaza area by as it was felt it was a reasonable expectation for the height of the structure which might be located in the location of the plaza. When the allowable GRFA is multiplied by the number of recommended developable number of stories this provides an approximate idea of the amount of GRI=A which could be constructed on the area being designated as public plaza. The next step was to subtract the amount of GRFA located within the setbacks and above the recommended maximum height in the Master plan of 78 feet on this portion of the site. Upon completion of this calculation it is found that the project is in excess of the amount of GRFA displaced by the proposed public plaza by approximately 121 square feet of GRFA. Therefore it is confirmed that the proposed public plaza has offset a majority of the 20 proposals GRFA encroachments of into setbacks and above the 78 foot height recommended in the Vail Village Master Plan. However, staff believes the deviation of 121 square feet in excess GRFA is outweighed by the proposed 5 berth loading and delivery facility which will be made available to the public, the two proposed public restrooms (870 s.f. total) and the installation of the complete streetscape improvements on Village Center Drive and East Meadow Drive. Area of Proposed Public Plaza: 24,130 s.f. CSC Allowable GRFA %: .40 Amount of GRFA: 9,652 s.f. Number of Developable Stories: x3.5 Square Footage of GRFA: 33,782 s.f. Amount of GRFA in Setbacks: -21,014 s.f. Remaining GRFA of Public Plaza: 12,768 s.f. Amount of GRFA on Floor 6: -12,889 s.f. Amount of GRFA in excess: -121 s.f. The computer model shows those portions of the Crossroads roof which exceed the heights granted at Four Seasons and Vail Plaza Hotel. Staff believes that the area of roof over the established heights of Vail Plaza Hotel and Four Seasons is offset by a combination of the public plaza, loading and delivery facility, public restrooms; and proposed streetscape improvements. In regard to setbacks the One Willow Bridge project varies between 0 feet (west end) and 20 feet. Setbacks along the east property line for Vail Village Inn Phase III vary between 15 and 55 feet. The proposed Crossroads development has setbacks along the north and east property lines which vary from one foot to 25 feet. Along the western property line the proposed Crossroads has aone-story enclosed loading facility which is within the required setback (3 feet off property line at closest location). Along East Meadow Drive the setbacks vary from 150 feet along the plaza to zero setback in the southeast and 4 feet in the southwest corners. Staff previously had concerns with the setback of the building along East Meadow Drive and the structure located in the southwest corner. Staff believed that it may be appropriate to have minimal setback along East Meadow Drive for several stories including a roof and then the structure would step back 15 to 20 feet before continuing up. The applicant has worked extensively on the portion of the structure located in the southwest portion of the site. The ridge is now 56 feet above grade which is six.(6) feet taller than the actual height of the One Willow Bridge project from the grade of East Meadow Drive. The height of 56 feet (actual height above finished grade) is still located at a 4 foot setback from the property line for a distance of 44 feet along East Meadow Drive. The length of the structure along East Meadow Drive has been reduced from 52 feet to 44 feet. Staff and Jeff Winston believe that the height of 56 feet over a span of 44 feet is an acceptable design as it creates a "neck down effect" between to more open public spaces, the proposed Crossroads plaza and the Vail Village Inn plaza. To address the concerns of staff and the representatives of Vail Village Inn Phase III the proposal has been revised to remove all portions of the building located with the setback along the western property line with the exception of the enclosed loading and delivery facility which has access off of the South Frontage Road. The subterranean improvements along the western property line have been pulled back from the property line to be a minimum distance of 10 feet from the property line. The architectural design of the Crossroads development, like its neighbors, is governed by the design guidelines prescribed in Chapter 11, Design Review, of the Vail Town Code and 21 :~ by the recommendations Vail Village Master Plan. As such, the architectural design of the proposed development is intended to be compatible with the unique European alpine village character prescribed for Vail Village. The exterior design of the development is a mixture of stone, metal and wood. Many of the finer details have not been resolved in the iwo presentations made to the Design Review Board. Since the January 18, 2005, Town Council meeting the proposed project has undergone revision and refinement on 'the architectural design of the structure. Both the staff and Jeff Winston agree that the applicant has made positive changes to the architecture and believe the overall architecture complies with the Town's guidelines. The concerns of staff and Jeff Winston are the use of large window systems especially in the upper p6rtions of ,the structure, the appearance of panelized-type materials in some locations on the building, and the emphasis on the vertical verse the horizontal. Staff has addressed this project's conformance with the Urban Design Guidelines in Criteria D of this section. Staff believes the architecture of the structurE: is beginning to incorporate further "Bavarian" elements so as to f'it in more harmoniously with the community. Staff believes that with additional work with the Design Review Board thhis project can fit into the overall architectural theme of Vail Village. The Vail Village Master Plan addresses the Crossroads development site throughout the Plan. In regard to building height, the Plan includes a conceptual map identifying potenltial heights of existing and future structures and states: "The building heights expressed on this Illustrative Plan are intended to provide general guidelines. Additional study should be made during specific project review relative to a building's height impact on fhe streetscape and relationship to surrounding structures. " The Plan identifies the northern portion of the Crossroads development site along the Frontage Road as being 5 to 6 stories in height and the southern portion as being 3 to 4 stories in height (the Plan identifies a story as being 9 feet in height and the Plan does riot include roof structure). A copy of Conceptual Building Height Plan is attached for reference (Attachment C). Since the last hearing with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council staff has located the minutes of the adoption of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan in which the PEC had recognized a building story as being considered 11 feet 6 inches plus a roof. Most recently the Tivoli Lodge, identified as being 3 to 4 stories tall in the Plan, established SDD #37 in order to achieve a 56-foot height limitation. Although the Tivoli Lodge is riot zoned Commercial Service Center, it is addressed within the Vail Village Master Plan. The Tivoli Lodge contended that the 48-foot limitation did not adequately address current hotel accommodation building trends. A 48-foot height limitation permits 9-foot floor to floor sections with an additional 12 feet for sloping roofs as recommended in the various town master plans (9' X 4 floors +12' = 48'}. According to the applicants, the proposal has achieved the heights of 99.9 feet at its highest point, down to 66 feet along East Meadow Drive as the floor plates they are proposing are 11 feet 6 inches from floor to floor except ~~n the two retail portions of the building where the floor to floor height is 13 feet and 14 feet. The applicant states that consistent 11 foot 6 inch floor plates are due to the need to provi~~e modern day living demands including air conditioning, 9-foot ceilings and flexibility in uinit design. Furthermore, at this site there are the additional issues of I-70 traffic noise and exposure to the sun in this location. Once the units are dry-walled, the ceiling heights in tl~e units will be 9 feet. In addition the applicant has proposed floor plates measuring 14 feet in height for the commercial levels to accommodate the additional height necessary to operate 22 a bowling alley's lane equipment and stadium seated theaters. The height of the floor plates in the residential levels and the added height necessary for the operation of a bowling alley and theaters explain the proposed heights on the building exceeding the recommended heights identified in the Vail Village Master Plan. Staff believes the height of the building in general is appropriate in relation to the uses proposed if the Commission agrees that an 11 foot 6 inch floor plate is appropriate for properties located within the scope of the Vail Village Master Plan. Staff has generally accepted an 11-foot floor-to-floor building plate on previous projects located within the scope of the Vail Village Master Plan such as the Tivoli Lodge and the Manor Vail Lodge (the PEC voted to adopt 11 foot 6 inch floor to floor in Lionshead as a part of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan). In addition, it has been previously determined that a roof structure is at an appropriate size when it is 12 feet from eave to ridge, as identified above. This particular project, according to the applicant, because of its proximity to the Interstate and large window areas (heat gain) will need to have climate control equipment which the two previous projects did not. If a floor-to-floor plate of 11 feet 6 inches and a 12-foot tall roof structure is acceptable the maximum height of structure, according to the Vail Village Master Plan should be 81 feet (11.5' X 6 stories + 12' = 81 feet) along the northern portion of the site and 58 feet (11.5' X 4 stories + 12' = 58) feet along the southern portion of the site. However, given the width of the proposed building forms and roof pitches, the proposed building will require more than 12 feet of roof height. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The uses, activities, and densities for the Crossroads development site are prescribed by the underlying zoning. According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, the underlying zoning for the proposed special development district is Commercial Service Center zone district. The Commercial Service Center zone district encourages the development of commercial facilities serving the Town with limited multiple-family dwellings at a density of eighteen (18) dwelling units per acre. However, the Vail Village Master Plan, adopted in 1990, identifies the site as being approximately three quarters medium/high density residential and one quarter mixed use. See attached copy of the Land Use Plan from the Vail Village Master Plan (Attachment D). The proposal is to construct permitted uses such retail shops, restaurants. and bars, offices, on-site accessory uses such as the ice skating rink, and conditional uses such as a major arcade, bowling allejr, movie theaters, 75 multiple-family dwelling units, and a private parking club. The applicant has requested the appropriate conditional use permits which will be addressed in later sections of this memorandum. The applicant has suggested that the proposed bowling alley, 3 screen theater, and sports bar /arcade activity center are public amenities as they bring life and vitality to the Town. In previous memorandums to the Commission, staff identified that the uses will likely fill a niche which is missing in Town. The proposed application has two levels of at-grade or above-grade retail surrounding the proposed plaza. Staff has expressed concerns in previous meetings regarding the continuous arc shaped frontage of the retail. Staff's concerns were two-fold; first, does such a design lure visitors and locals to shop in the environment and; second, the geometric properties of an arc will not allow for material changes to the facade's of the individual tenant 'spaces. The Design Review Board in their meetings had also expressed a concern about the limited ability to individualize a tenant space store front. In response to the concern 23 expressed by staff, the Design Review Board, the Planning and Environmental Commission, and Town Council the applicant has brought additional staff onto their team to address the commercial experience. Since the last meeting the applicant has prepared several drawings which exhibit how the retail storefronts could be individualized. The staff and Jeff Winston believe the changes made by the applicant were a tremendous step in alleviating our concerns regarding the design. However, staff, Jeff Winston, and the applicant believe that working with the Design Review Board will produce a functional and active design for'the retail levels. The above criterion specifically identifies the proposed density of a project as needing to be compatible with surrounding properties. This property is restricted to 18 dwelling units/acre per the underlying zoning.. The applicant is proposing a density of 28.4 dwelling units/a~~re with 210,054 square feet of GRFA. The neighboring property to the south, the One Willow Bridge/Sonnenalp Hotel development, is limited to 25 dwelling units/acre, which the new development has proposed 8 dwelling units for a density of 2.9 dwelling units/acre with 135,184 square feet of GRFA. One Willow Bridge/Sonnenalp Hotel was substantially accommodation units (123 units) and fractional fee units (14 units) which do not count towards density. The adjacent property to the west, Vail Village Inn Phase III (SDD #6), is limited to 25 dwelling units/acre with the underlying zoning. In the Ordinance adopting SDD #6 it is not clear the number of dwelling units allowed, however, it identifies a minimum of 148 accommodation units and 64,267 square feet of GRFA shall be located in Phase IV' of the project, however the overall project has a much greater density. As can be seen i:he proposed Crossroads project has a greater density than the constructed or proposed neighboring properties and more GRFA Staff believes the proposed Crossroads redevelopment complies with this portion of the criterion as the proposed public benefits outweigh all deviations proposed. Employee Housing Requirements As indicated in a number of the goals and objectives of the Town's Master Plans, providing affordable housing for employees is a critical issue which should be addressed through the planning process for special development district proposals. to reviewing the proposal For employee housing needs, staff relied on the Town of Vail Employee Housing Report. Tliis report has been used by the staff in the past to evaluate employee housing needs. The guidelines contained within the report were used most recently in the review of the Austria Haus, Marriott, Four Seasons, Manor Vail Lodge, and Special Development District No. 6 - Vail Village Inn development proposals. The Employee Housing Report was prepared for the Town by the consulting firm Ros<~II, Remmen and Cares. The report provides the recommended ranges of employee housing units needed based on the type of use and the amount of floor area dedicated to each u:>e. Utilizing the guidelines prescribed in the Employee Housing Report, staff analyzed the incremental increase of employees (square footage per use) that results from the redevelopment. The figures identified in the report are based on surveys of the commercial-use employment needs of the Town of Vail and other mountain resort communities. As of the drafting of the report, Telluride, Aspen and Whistler, B.C. had "employment generation" ordinances requiring developers to provide affordable housing for a percentage of the new employees 24 resulting from commercial development. "New" employees are defined as the incremental increase in employment needs resulting from commercial redevelopment. Each of the communities assesses a different percentage of affordable housing a developer must provide for the new employees. For example, Telluride requires developers to provide housing for 40% (0.40) of the new employees, Aspen requires that 60% (0.60) of the new employees are provided housing, and Whistler requires that 100% (1.00) of the new employees be provided housing by the developer. In comparison, Vail has conservatively determined that developers shall provide housing for 15% (0.15) or 30% (0.30) of the new employees resulting from commercial development. When a project is proposed to exceed the density allowed by the underlying zone district, the 30% (0.30) figure is used in the calculation. If a project is proposed at, or below, the density allowed by the underlying zone district, the 15% (0.15) figure is used. The Crossroads special development district does exceed the density permitted by the underlying zone district in both number of dwelling units and GRFA so the 30% ratio was used. Proposed Project Employee Generation Calculations -Middle of Ranqe a) Multi-Family (Dwelling Units) 75 new units proposed @ (0.4/unit) = 30.0 employees b) Retail and Service Commercial 45,000 sq. ft. @ (5.0/1000 sq. ft.) = 225.0 employees c) Bar/Restaurant/Arcade/Theater/Bowling 13,000 sq. ft. @ (5.0/1000 sq. ft.) = 65.0 employees 320.0 employees Existing Crossroads Project Employee Generation Calculations -Middle of Ranqe a) b) Multi-Familiy (Dwelling Units) 22 units existing @ (0.4/unit) Retail and Service Commercial 22,11.6 sq. ft. @ (5.0/1000 sq. ft.) = 8.8 employees = 110.58 employees c) d) e) Office: Professional/Other 20,000 sq. ft. @ (5.0/1000 sq. ft.) Bar/Restaurant/Night ClublTheater 13,550 sq. ft. @ (5.0/1000 sq. ft.) Bank 2,750 sq. ft. @ (2.5/000 sq. ft.) = 100.0 employees = 67.75 employees = 6.88 employees 25 f) Grocery 6,240 sq. ft. @ (1.5/1000 sq. ft.) = 9.36 employees 303.37 employees 320.00 new employees - 303.37 exisitinq employe~ss 16.63 net new employees x.30 4.99 required # beds According to the calculations above, the applicant must establish 5 new deed-restricted employee beds ("pillows"). The applicants are proposing to provide the required de~~d- restricted employee housing units off-site through the purchase of units throughout Town or through apay-in-lieu program if it established by the Town prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant will deed restrict the units under the appropriate deed restrictions depending upon which zone district the property is located within 'the community under the appropriate review process. In the previous meeting the Commission asked for greater detail on how a "bed" will be defined in regards to the deed restricting of units. For example if the applicant purchased a structure containing three bedrooms this could potentially count as six employee "beds". As expressed by the Commission a unit as described previously may likely be rented by a family and would still count as six employee beds. Staff recommends that the developer submit to staff, prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy, the location of the units proposecl to be deed restricted along with the appropriate review application which is applicable or remit payment in funds commensurate with any adopted pay-in-lieu program. Please see 1:he applicant's employee housing unit proposal which is attached for reference (Attachment E). Staff believes that the proposal does. comply with this portion of the criterion. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 12-10 of the Vail Town Code. As indicated in the Zoning Analysis outlined iri Section VI of this memorandum, the total number of required parking spaces for the Crossroads project is 246 spaces. The applicants are proposing to provide a total of 338 spaces, all of which are to be provided) in the underground parking structure. The 92 additional parking spaces proposed to be constructed above and beyond thatwhich is required are proposed to be placed in a priw~te parking club. The proposed subterranean parking structure permits a public plaza on the surface which contains a proposed ice skating rink. In order to establish a private parking club offering parking spaces, the Town Code requires the review and approval of a conditional use permit by the Commission. The applicant: is proposing to establish a 92 stall private parking club. Staff addresses the criteria for the establishment of a private parking club later in this section. The applicant is proposing to utilize all of the 92 surplus parking spaces in a private parking club in which participants would lease a space or potentially purchase if the applic~~nt 26 chooses to condominiumize the spaces. The applicant desires to maintain ownership of the parking spaces to avoid not having enough parking for the retail, restaurant, and office uses if the project becomes as successful as anticipated. There is a possibility that as various tenants begin to design and occupy their spaces that additional surplus parking may become available. When calculating the required parking staff and the applicantwere conservative in estimating what percentage of retail and restaurant spaces will become areas not assessed parking. An analysis will need to be run as each tenant goes in for building permit and as tenants change out in the future. The applicant can return before the Commission at a later date if additional surplus parking is created based on tenant make-up to amend the conditional use permit. Staff recommends that the developer be permitted to establish a 92 parking space private club. The applicant has proposed a five berth loading and delivery facility which is the maximum required for this project. The proposed facilitywill be accessed off of the Frontage Road and made available to neighboring properties for their loading and delivery needs as well. The proposed loading and delivery facility is entirely enclosed and large vehicles can make all turning movements inside the structure. The applicant and the staff agree that the location, configuration, and public use of the loading facility are a public benefit to the Town as it reduces conflicts with pedestrians, reduces impacts due to being enclosed, and its availability to the public for use. Staff recommends that through the Developer Improvement Agreement the developer enter into an agreement with the Town to include the loading and delivery facility in the overall loading and delivery system for the Town of Vail. Staff believes that the application complies with this criterion. D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plan. The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to be used as the Town's policy guidelines during the review process for the establishment of a special development district. Staff has reviewed the Vail Land Use Plan and believes the following policies are relevant to the review of this proposal: 1.0 General Growth/Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 2.0 Skier/Tourist Concerns 27 2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day skiers. 2.2 The ski area owner, the business community and the Town IeadE:rs should work together closely to make existing facilities and the Town function more efficiently. 2.3 The ski area owner, the business community and the Town IeadE;rs should work together to improve facilities for day skiers. 2.4 The community should improve summer recreational and cultural opportunities to encourage summer tourism. 3.0 Commercial 3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more efficiently. 3.2 The Village and Lionshead areas are the best location for hotels to serve the future needs of the destination skiers. 3.3 Hotels are important to the continued success of the Town of Vail, therefore conversion to condominiums should be discouraged. 3.4 Commercial growth should be concentrated in existing commercial areas to accommodate both local and visitor needs. 4.0 Village Core /Lionshead 4.1 Future commercial. development should continue to occur primarily in existing commercial areas. Future commercial development in tl~e Core areas needs to be carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery. 4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is preserved thorough implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan. 4.3 The ambiance of Vail Village is important to the identity of Vail and should be preserved. (scale, alpine character, small town feeling, mountains, natural setting, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental quality.) 5.0 Residential 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do riot exist. 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of 28 Vail with. appropriate restrictions. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a full range of housing types. 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing, needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community. According to the Official Town of Vail Land Use Plan map, the applicant's proposed redevelopment site is located with the "Vail Village Master Plan"land use category. Pursuant to the Plan, the "Vail Village Master Plan" land use category description, "Vail Village has been designated separately as a mixed use area and accounts for 77 acres or about 2% of the Plan area.. This area has not been analyzed in this Plan document because the Vail Village Master Plan study addressed this area specifically in more detail." Staff believes that the application- complies with the goals and objectives identified above. Vail Village Master Plan Staff believes that the following stated goals of the Vail Village Master Plan are applicable to this application: Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-around economic health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. Objective 2.4: Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity where compatible with existing land uses. Policy 2.4.1: Commercial infill development consistent with established horizontal zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provide activity generators, accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and streetscape improvements to the pedestrian network Throughout the Village. Policy 2.4:2: Activity that provides riight life and evening entertainment for both the guest and the community shall be encouraged. Objective 2.5: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. Policy 2.5.1: Recreation amenities, common areas, meeting facilities and other amenities. shall be preserved and enhanced as a part of any redevelopment of lodging properties. Policy 2.5.2: The Town will use the maximum flexibility possible in the interpretation of building and fire codes in order to facilitate building renovations without compromising 29 life, health, and safety considerations. Objective 2.6: Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of the private sector. Policy 2.6.1: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or redeveloped project requesting densrity over that allowed by existing zoning. Policy 2.6.2: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force. Policy 2.6.3: The Town of Vail may facilitate in the development of affordable housing by providing limited assistance. Goal #3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience throughout the Village. Objective 3.1: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. Policy 3.1.1: Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas), along adjacE~nt pedestrian ways. Policy 3.1.2: Public art shall be encouraged at appropriate locations throughout Town. Policy 3.1.3: Flowers, trees, water features, and other landscaping shall be encouraged throughout the Town in locations adjacent to, or visible from, public areas. Goa! #4: To preserve existing open space areas and expand greenspa~~e opportunities. Objective 4.1: Improve existing open space areas and create nE~w plazas with greenspaces and pocket parks. Recognize the different roles of each type pf open space in forming the overall fabric of tl~e Village. Policy 4.1.1: Active recreation facilities steal! be preserved ('or relocated to accessible locations elsewhere in the. Village) in any development or redevelopment of property in Vail Village. Policy 4.1.2: .The development of new public plazas, and improvement to existing plazas (public art, streetscape features, seating areas, etc.), shall be strongly encouraged to 30 reinforce their roles as attractive people places. Policy 4.1.3: With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural open space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout Vail Village shall be preserved as open space. Policy 4.1.4: Open space improvements including the .addition of accessible greenspace as described orgraphically shown in the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Urban Design Guide Plan; will be required in conjunction with private infill or redevelopment projects. Goal #5: Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulation system throughout the Village. Objective 5.1: Meet parking demands with public and private parking facilities. Policy 5.1.1: Fornew development that is Ivcated outside the Commercial Core /Zone District, on-site parking shall be provided (rather than paying into the parking fund) to meet any additional parking demand as required by the zoning code. Policy 5.1.2: The expansion of the .Vail Village parking structure shall maximize the number of additional parking spaces available for public parking. Policy 5.1.3: Seek locations for additional structured public and private parking. Policy 5.1.4: Continue to promote the lease parking program as a means for maximizing the utilization of private parking spaces. Policy 5.1.5: Redevelopment projects shall be strongly encouraged to provide underground or visually concealed parking. Objective 5.3: Concentrate the majority of interconnecting transit activity at the periphery of the Village to minimize vehicular traffic in pedestrianized areas. Policy 5.3.1: The Vail Transportation Center shall be the primary pick up and drop off point for public transit and private shuttle vans and taxis. Objective 5.4: Improve the streetscape of circulation corridors throughout the Village. 31 Policy 5.4.1: The Town shall work with the Colorado Divis,+on of Highways toward the implementation of a landscaped boulevard and parkway along the South Frontage Road. Policy 5.4.2:.Medians and right-of--ways shall be landscaped. Goal #6: To ensure the continued improvement of the vital operational elements of the Village. Objective 6.1: Provide service and delivery facilities for existing and new development. Objective 6.2: Provide for the safe and efficient functions of fire, police and public utilities within the context of an aesthetically pleasing resort setting. Policy 6.2.1: Development projects and other improvements in Vail Village shall be reviewed by respective TOrNn Departments fo identify both the impacts of the proposal a,nd potential mitigating measures. Policy 6.2.2: Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving, open dining decks, etc.), maybe permitted on Town of Vail land orright-of--way (with review and approval by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission when applicable) provided that Town aperations such as snaw removal, street maintenance and fire departmE~nt access and operation are able to be maintained at current levels. Special design (i.e. heated pavement), maintenance fees, or other considerations may be required to offsret impacts on Town services. Staff believes that the application complies with all of the goals, objectives, and policies identified above. Previously staff expressed that the proposal needed to address Objective 2.3. The proposal now includes a total of eight (8) lock-off units to increase the likelihood that the project will have a greater occupancy rate. The applicant has submitted a renttal program to increase the likelihood of owners placing their units into a rental pool (Attachment F). Staff believes the applicant has made great progress in the architectural design and believes that through the Design Review process the architecture can fie resolved. Staff, in previous memorandums, expressed concerns about the scale of tl~e structure and its relationship to neighboring properties. Through the use of the computer model staff believes that the revised proposal will now be at an appropriate scale to neighboring properties, Four Seasons, and Vail Plaza Hotel. While it is true that tFiis proposal will set a new precedence for height (99.9 feet) staff believes that the height and other deviations are offset by the combination of benefits such as the public plaza, streetscape, and incorporation of the loading and delivery facility in the overall loading and delivery system for the Town. Staff under Criterion A addresses the benefits and reasoning behind staff's belief that the new precedence for height has been offset by various elements of the proposal. 32 Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan The Town's Streetscape Master Plan does identify East Meadow Drive and Village Center Road within the East Meadow Drive -Willow Bridge Road to Vail Valley Drive portion of the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan. The Plan identifies the following problems with the existing conditions within this sub-area: • The need to separate buses from pedestrians; • The need to provide a more comfortable shopping experience; • The need to restrict unnecessary vehicular traffic; • The need to maintain access to existing lodge units; and • The need to screen parking and accommodate loading and delivery vehicles. The Plan also identifies several key elements, landscaping, and site amenities for the East Meadow Drive -Willow Bridge Road to Vail Valley Drive sub-area which include: The asphalt road surface would be replaced by concrete unit pavers in most areas where pedestrians share the street with vehicles. IN the restricted access zone south of the Village parking structure, the pedestrian path would be paved with concrete unit pavers. However, the bus lane would remain asphalt. Additionally, • the Willow Bridge Road street surface, from the north side of Willow Bridge fo the intersection of East Meadow Drive, would also remain asphalt. • Replacing the triangular planter at the intersection of East Meadow Drive and Willow Bridge Road with a larger circular planter that is centered in the intersection. In addition, the intersection will be accented with a special paving treatment and will act as a focal point. • Village Center Road would be narrowed to a minimum width of 28' (curb-to- curb) to discourage unnecessary traffic. Fix to six foot wide concrete sidewalks on each side of the street are planned to connect East Meadow Drive to the Frontage Road. • The railroad-tie planters along the parking lots for Crossroads and the Sonnenalp-Swiss House should be replaced with at-grade planting beds, similar to the planting beds along the south side of East Meadow Drive near the Vail Village Inn. • Landscaping is needed along Village Center Road, especially near the Frontage Road, so as to further inhibit vehicular traffic into the pedestrianized areas. • Landscaping, benches and a trash receptacle should be placed at the Crossroad's bus stop as shown on the Master Plan graphic. • Expanding the planter on the south side of the intersection of Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive has been suggested. This would provide better definition to the roadway as well as increasing the landscaped area. 33 Staff believes the proposal meets the requirements of the Streetscape Master Plan. Previously staff identified that there was a lack of landscaping within the proposed public plaza to replace the "at-grade planting beds" identified by the Plan to replace i:he railroad-tie beds. The proposal has been revised to incorporate multiple landscaping beds. Staff believes that the proposal complies with the recommendations of the Vail Village Master Plan East Meadow Drive -Willow Bridge Road to Vail Valley Drive sub- area. Staff would recommend that the applicant work to implement those portions of i:he Streetscape master which address the intersection of Village Center Drive and East Meadow Drive by working with the property owner of Village Center. Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations Portions of the Crossroads development site fall within the prevue of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations 1. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS These considerations relate to general, large-scale land use planning issues, as well as form considerations which affect more than one property or even whole areas. These considerations are primarily the purview of the Planning and Environmental Commission. A. PEDESTRIANIZATION A major objective for Vail Village is to encourage pedestrian circulation through an interconnected network of safe, pleasant pedestrian ways. Many of the improvements recognized in the Urban Design Guide Plans, and accompanying Design Considerations, are to reinforce and expand the quality of pedestrian walkways throughout the Village. Since vehicular traffic cannot be removed from certain streets (bus routE;s, delivery access), a totally care-free pedestrian system is not achievat~le throughout the entire Village. Therefore, several levels of pedestrianizati~~n have been identified. Staff Response; The Crossroads development site is bordered by East Meadow Drive on the south and Village Center Road to the east. Both East Meadow Drive and Village Center Road are designated as streets intended to accommodate pedestrian and vehicle traffic. East Meadow Drive is also a designated Town of Vail bus route. The applicants are proposing to implement the recommendations of tl~e Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan. According to the Plan, tl~e Crossroads development site is located in the East Meadow Drive -Willow Bridge Road #o Vail Valley Drive Sub Area. The details of the goals in this sub area are identified earlier in this section. The primary goal of the E2ist Meadow Drive -Willow Bridge Road to Vail Valley Drive Sub Area is to provide an effective and safe pedestrian system, while accommodating vehicle and bicycle traffic. 34 The applicant has proposed to install pavers and heat tubing in the right-of- way of Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive. The proposed heat tubing could eventually be connected to the Town's boilers in the parking structure or elsewhere in the area. The applicant has proposed the narrowing of Village Center Road as the Streetscape Master Plan identified to discourage vehicular traffic and make the pedestrian more pleasant and safer. In addition, the applicant has proposed a large plaza with an ice skating ring located within it which would be coordinated in design with the intersection of East Meadow Drive and Willow Bridge Road. The proposed plaza would be heated as well and connected to boilers in the Crossroads development. As identified earlier in this section the applicant has proposed a portion of the building in the southwest corner to be at a 4 foot setback with an actual height of 56 feet. Staff believes this feature will serve an important purpose in the pedestrian feel of the streetscape by providing a "pinch point" between the proposed plaza and the plaza created by .Vail Village Inn and the Sonnenalp. Staff believes. that the proposed application does comply with this criterion. B. VEHICLE PENETRATION To maximize to the extent possible, all non-resident traffic should be routed along the Frontage Road to Vail Village/Lionshead Parking Structures. In conjunction with pedestrianization objectives, major emphasis is focused upon reducing auto penetration into the center of the Village. Vail Road and Vail Valley Drive will continue to serve as major routes for service and resident access to the Village. Road constrictions, traffic circles, signage, and other measures are indicated in the Guide Plans to visually and physically discourage all but essential vehicle penetration upon the Frontage Road. Alternative access points and private parking relocation, where feasible, should be considered to further reduce traffic conflicts in the Village. Staff Response: The Crossroads development has proposed a 5 berth loading and delivery facility with access from South Frontage Road. The applicant has stated that they are willing to participate in the overall loading and delivery scheme of the Village. All vehicles utilizing the Crossroads development will park in a subterranean structure which has access off of the narrowed Village Center Road. The proposal includes several items which will help make East Meadow Drive and Willow Bridge Road more pedestrian friendly such as paver colors and treatments and narrowed roads. Neither street is intended to be pedestrian-only. Staff believes that the proposed application complies with this criterion. 35 C. STREETSCAPE FRAMEWORK To improve the quality of the walking experience and give continuity to irhe pedestrian ways, as a continuous system, two general types of improvements adjacent to the walkways are considered: 1. Open space and landscaping, berms, grass, flowers and tree plantling as a soft, colorful framework linkage along pedestrian routes; and plazas a~~nd park greenspaces as open nodes and focal points along those routes. 2. Infill commercial storefronts, expansion of existing buildings, or rnew infill development to create new commercial activity generators to give streetlife and visual interest, as attractions at key locations along pedestrian routes. It is not intended to enclose all Village streets with buildings as in the core areas. Nor is it desirable to leave pedestrian streets in the open in somewhat undefined condition evident in many other areas of Vail. Rather, it is desired to have a variety of open and enclosed spaces, both built and landscapE:d, which create a strong framework for pedestrian walks, as well as visual interest and activity. Staff Response: The applicants are proposing to improve and enhance the streetscape framework along Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive. To this er~d, a plan has been proposed that incorporates narrowed streets, pavers with differing colors and patterns and a large plaza within. the proposed development. Staff believes the proposed plaza could be very positive 1`or the community. Since the January 18, 2005, Town Council meeting tlhe proposal for the public plaza has been improved greatly. The incorporation of additional plating beds and other features within the plaza have been provided to address the items identified in the criterion above. The applicant as also proposed to install heated sidewalks along the perimeter of the sine. Staff believes that the proposed application complies with this criterion. D. STREET ENCLOSURE W hile building facade heights should not be uniform from building to building, they should provide a "comfortable" enclosure for the street. Pedestrian streets are outdoor rooms, whose walls are formed by the buildings. The shape and feel of these "rooms" are created by the variety of heights and massing (3-dimensional variations), which give much of the visual interest and pedestrian scale unique to Vail. Very general rules, about the perception of exterior spaces have been developed by designers, based on the characteristics of human vision. They suggest that: "an external enclosure is most comfortable when its walls are approximately 1 /2 as high as the width of the space enclosed; if the ratio falls to 1/4 or less, the space seems unenclosed; and if the height is greater than the width it comes to resemble a canyon". 36 In actual application, facades are seldom uniform in height on both sides of the street, nor is this desired. Thus, some latitude is .appropriate in the application of this 1/2 to 1 ratio. Using the average facade height on both sides will generally still be a guide to the comfortableness of the enclosure being created. In some instances, the "canyon" effect is acceptable and even desirable. For example, as a short connecting linkage between larger spaces, to give variety to the walking experience. For sun/shade reasons it is often advantageous to orient any longer segments in anorth/south direction. Long canyon streets in an east/west direction should generally be discouraged. When exceptions to the general height criteria occur, special consideration should be given to create swell-defined ground floor pedestrian emphasis to overcome the "canyon" effect. Canopies; awnings, arcades and building extensions can all create a . pedestrian focus and divert attention from the upper building heights and "canyon" effect. Staff Response: The configuration of the Crossroads development site and the desire to create a large plaza in the interior largely dictates the orientation of the building and the impacts that result regarding street enclosure. The two street facades of the building are articulated and varied, horizontally and vertically, along the lengths of the building. The applicant has chosen to utilize an 11foot 6 inch floor plate which has the net effect of this building being taller. Staff and the applicant have worked together to address the relationship of this proposal to neighboring properties. Compatibility with adjacent buildings has been accomplished by reducing the pitch of the roof, removing a floor in the building in several locations, changes to the northeast and northwest corners of the building, and the addition of roof features along the western facade. Staff believes that the application complies with this criterion. E. STREET EDGE Buildings in the Village core should form a strong but irregular edge to the street. Unlike many American towns, there are no standard setback requirements for buildings in Vail Village. Consistent with the desire for intimate pedestrian scale, placement of portions of a building at or near the property line is allowed and encouraged to give strong definition to the pedestrian streets. This is not to imply continuous building frontage along the property line. A strong street edge is important for continuity, but perfectly aligned facades over too long a distance tends to be monotonous. With only a few exceptions in the Village, slightly irregular facade lines, building jogs, and landscaped areas, give the life to the street and visual interest for pedestrian 37 travel. Where buildings jog to create activity pockets, other elements can be used to continue the street edge: low planter walls, tree planting, raised sidewalks, texture changes in ground surface, arcades, raised decks. Plazas, patios, and green areas are important focal points for gathering; resting, orienting and should be distributed throughout the Village with clue consideration to spacing, sun access, opportunities for views and pedestrian activity. Staff Response: The Crossroads proposal, as stated previously, includes a large plaza which opens up the pedestrian area at the intersection of Willow Bridge Road and East Meadow Drive. It has been stated by the applicant that it is the intention to make the plaza available to the public and Town for events such as "Street Beat" concerts. Staff believes that the plaza is a great idea. However, s1:aff would like to see a public easement recorded for the space and agreemeints on the Town's rights to schedule events in the space. The proposed plaza would compliment the eventual construction of the public venue space associated with the construction of the Vail's Front Door project. Si:aff believes the proposal substantially complies with this criterion. However, details of the public easement need to be clarified. F. BUILDING HEIGHT Vail Village is perceived as a mix of two and three story facades, although there are also four and five story buildings. The mix of building heights gives variety to the street, which is desirable. The height criteria are intended to encourage height in massing variety and to discourage uniform building heights along the street. Staff Response: The applicant is proposing to construct an eight story structure (six stories of residential on top of and set back from the base two stories of commercial). Staff believes that the building has been revised to better compliment neighboring properties as identified in previous portions of this memorandum. As stated earlier in the memorandum, the applicant is proposing to utilize an 11 foot 6 inch floor plates in place of the established 11 foot floor plate. If the Commission agrees with the applicant's reasons for the need of an 11 foot 6 inch floor plate it will become the new standard and staff believes that the application will comply with this criterion. G. VIEWS AND FOCAL POINTS Vail's mountain/valley setting is a fundamental part of its identity. Views of the mountains, ski slopes, creeks and other natural features are reminders to our visitors of the mountain environment and, by repeated visibility, are orientation reference points. Certain building features also provide import~~nt orientation references and visual focal points. The most significant view corridors in the Village have been adopted as part of Chapter .18.73 of the 38 Vail Municipal Code. The view corridors adopted should not be considered exhausted. When evaluating a development proposal, priority should be given to an analysis of the impacted project on public views. Views that should be preserved originate from either major pedestrian areas or public spaces, and include views of the ski mountain, the Gore Range, the Clock Tower, the Rucksack Tower and other important man-made and natural elements that contribute to the sense of place associated with Vail. These views, which have been adopted by ordinance, were chosen due to their significance, not only from an aesthetic standpoint, but also as orientation reference points for pedestrians. Development in Vail Village shall not encroach into any adopted view corridor, unless approved under Chapter 18.73. Adopted corridors are listed in Chapter 18.73 of the Vail Municipal Code. Whether affecting adopted view corridors or not, the impact of proposed development on views from public ways and public spaces must be identified and considered where appropriate. Staff Response: The Crossroads development site is not located within any of the Town of Vail adopted view corridors. The projects location adjacent to the South Frontage Road lends the project to potentially affecting only the views of residential unit owners in Phase III of the Vail Village Inn towards the Gore Range; not an adopted view corridor. It is important to note, however, that many of the units in Phase III of the Vail Village Inn currently do not have views of the Gore Range except for potentially the top two floors. The primary views of both the Crossroads development site and Vail Village Inn Phase lil is to the south towards Vail Mountain. Staff believes that the application complies with this criterion. H. SERVICE AND DELIVERY Any building expansion should preserve the functions of existing service alleys. The few service alleys that exist in the Village are extremely important to minimizing vehicle congestion on pedestrian ways. The use of, and vehicular access to, those alleys should not be eliminated except where functional alternatives are not provided. In all new and remodeled construction, delivery which avoids or reduces impacts on pedestrian ways should be explored; and adopted whenever practical, for immediate or future use. Rear access, basement and below ground delivery corridors reduce congestion. Weather protection increases delivery efficiency substantially. Below grade delivery corridors are found in a few buildings in Vail Village (Sitzmark/Gore Creek Plaza, Village Center, Vail Village Inn). Consideration should be given to extending these corridors, where feasible, and the creation of new ones. As buildings are constructed or remodeled, the opportunity may exist to develop segments of a future system. Staff Response: The applicant has designed a service and delivery system which will avoid 39 and reduce the negative impacts on the pedestrian ways adjacent to 'the lodge. As stated previously the applicant has proposed an enclosed 5-k>ay loading and delivery system which has access off of the South Frontage Road. The proposed design allows for neighboring properties to utilize'~the facility and eliminates truck traffic on Village Center Road and on East Meadow Drive. The applicant shall be required to participate in the overall loading and delivery plan for Vail Village in a similar fashion as the Willow Bridge project and the Vail's Front Door project. Staff believes that i:he application complies with this criterion. SUN/SHADE Due to Vail's alpine climate, sun is an important comfort factor, especially in winter, fall and spring. Shade areas have ambient temperatures substantially below those of adjacent direct sunlight areas. On all but the warmest of summer days, shade can easily lower temperatures below comfortable levels and thereby, negatively impact use of those areas. All new or expanded buildings should not substantially increase the spring and fall shadow line (March 21 -September 23) on adjacent properties or the public right-of-way. In all building construction, shade shall be considered in massing and overall height consideration. Notwithstanding, sun/shade considerations are riot intended to restrict building height allowances, but rather to influence the massing of buildings. Limited height exceptions may be granted to meet this criterion. Staff Response: The proposal does shade the South Frontage Road to a great extent and 'For short periods of the late morning it shades Vail Village Inn Phase I II. In order to eliminate the shading of Vail Village Inn Phase III the project would have to be pulled much further back from the property line than even just the setback. Staff believes that the extent of the shading and the duration of shade on Vail Village Inn Phase III is minimal and acceptable. A copy of tlhe sun/shade study has been attached for reference (Attachment C). Staff believes that the application complies with this criterion. As previously discussed in this section of the memorandum, staff believes that fhe application complies with all the goals and objectives of the Vail Comprehensive plan. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect tlhe property on which the special development district is proposed. According to the Official Town of Vail Geologic Hazard Maps, the Crossroads development site is not located in any geologically sensitive areas. Staff believes that the application complies with this criterion. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. ao The proposed site plan shows the building encroaching into the setbacks surrounding the property. The applicant states that the primary reason for this is the proposed creation of a large plaza which will have an ice skating rink during the winter and a pop jet water feature in the summer. Staff previously expressed concerns regarding the "forward looking expression of European alpine heritage and more contemporary forms" (taken from the applicant's proposal document) and how it would compliment the character of the Village. Staff and the applicant have worked together on the architecture of the building and agree that the overall architecture of the building is compatible and consistent with existing buildings in the area, the potential future redevelopment of structures in the area, and the Town's design guidelines. Staff and the applicant agree that any remaining details of the architecture will be worked out with the Design Review Board in the review of the project upon approval of the Town Council. As discussed previously the applicant has proposed an ice skating rink/pop jet water feature within the proposed plaza. Staff agrees that there is public benefit to this proposed use. However, staff believes that in order for~the plaza to achieve the maximum value as a public benefit and to offset the deviations proposed staff believes that a pedestrian access easement and usage agreement should be entered into with the developer. The easement and agreements would establish rights for the Town to coordinate potential events on the public plaza. In the absence of such an agreement, the public plaza does not have value as a public benefit. Staff recommends that the Commission requires a condition that would establish an agreement between the Town and Developer regarding the proposed public plaza. Staff believes the proposal complies with this criterion. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. The Town of Vail Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed plans for circulation to ensure that it is designed well for both vehicles and pedestrians on and off the site. Following the review of the plans, the Public Works Department forwarded their written final comments in a memorandum, dated April 11, 2005. Many of the final comments are time sensitive actions that can only be accomplished at a later date or ale only necessary to address if the applicants receive approval of this request. To require full compliance at this time would thus be inappropriate. A copy of the memorandum with the final written comments from the Public Works Department has been attached for reference (Attachment G). The traffic report submitted by the applicant depicts overall intersection levels for existing and future service being maintained at a Level Of Service (LOS) A. However, two individual turn movements within the intersection • have decreased their level of service. More specifically the north bound left off of Village Center Road onto the South Frontage Road has decreased from a LOS of C to a D and the west bound left from South Frontage Road onto Village Center Road has decreased for a LOS of A to B. The overall impact on Village Center Road's north bound left turn lane is a queue increase of 25 feet in length to 50 feet in length. Staff believes that it will be imperative to assess the applicant a fee of $5,000 per additional peak PM trip generated by this project should it be granted approval. The traffic report identifies that there is a net increase of 69 PM Peak Hour trips far the Crossroads project. At $5,000 per net trip this results in an impact fee of $345,000. This impact fee can 41 be offset by any proposed improvements to the South Frontage Road and intersection of Village Center Road including, curb and gutter, drainage improvements, paving improvements, removal of right turn lane, new median improvements, sidewalk improvements, etc. To address the concerns of circulation of pedestrians and vehicles and the conflicts that <~re present between the two, the applicant has proposed improvements to Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive which make the area feel more pedestrian oriented and restri~:,ts errant vehicular traffic from finding its way into the pedestrian area by narrowing the roads. The proposal will also improve loading and delivery traffic in the area. The proposal also includes a fully enclosed 5 berth loading and delivery facility with access off of the Frontage Road. Currently, there is a fairly high volume of loading and delivery vehicles on Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive. The applicant has expressed that they are willing to be a member of the overall loading and delivery system which currently has participation from the eventual Vail's Front Door facility and the One Willow Bridge project facility. Staff recommends that through a developer improvement agreement that the 5 berth loading and delivery facility is made available for inclusion in the overall Town of Vail loading and deliveery system which may include the establishment of an easement. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. The applicant has proposed a large plaza along East Meadow Drive which contains an ice skating rink in the winter and apop-jet water feature in the warmer months. The proposed plaza has been reworked to include greater landscaping than in previous submittals.. Tl~e planter bed locations and the landscaping to be planted in each will be carefully selected in order for the retail to be as visible as possible. As has been stated previously the applicant's proposal does not comply with the minimum requirement of landscaped area as defined by the Code. While the overall total landscaped area, 42,255 square feet of hardscape and softscape is well over the minimum required, 23,025 square feet, it is the ratio of hardscape to softscape which does not meet the Code requirements. By Code 80% of the required landscape area (18,420 s.f.) is to be softscape (green vegetation) and a maximum of 20% (4,605 s.f.) can be hardscape (pavers, plazas, patios, etc.). ~ The proposal includes a ratio of the provided landscaped area, 42,255 square feet, which is 64.7% hardscape (mainly the proposed plaza) to 35.3% softscape. This ratio leaves the proposal 3,522 square feet . under the minimum requirement for softscape on the site. Staff believes that the inclusion of the proposed public plaza is a benefit which warrants the minimum deviation requested in the Code required ration for landscaped areas. Since the Commission last saw the applicant's proposal focus has been placed upon the landscaping plan and incorporating the appropriate scale of landscaping upon the plan. Tlie current landscaping plan includes a variety of plants. In order to mitigate the proposed height of the structure the plan includes numerous evergreen trees ranging from heights of 20 feet to 40 feet. Staff believes that the changes are an improvement which now makes this proposal comply with this criterion. 42 I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. The applicant is proposing to construct the project in one phase and a subdivision of the property will be necessary to facilitate the development of the Crossroads project. B. Consideration of Factors Regarding Text Amendments Before acting on an application for an amendment to the regulations prescribed in this title, the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested text amendments: . 1. The extent to which the text amendments further the general and specific purposes of the zoning regulations; and The proposal to add "bowling alley" as a definition within Section 12-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, and as a conditional use within the Commercial Service Center zone district furthers the general and specific purposes of the zoning regulations by providing a restricted opportunity to introduce a land use which, when appropriate, makes Vail a more vibrant location for visitors and guests. The applicant is proposing the following language be included as the definition of bowling alley: BOWLING ALLEY.' A recreation and entertainment facility where the sport of bowling takes place. A bowling alley may also includes accessory entertainment facilities and uses such as eating and drinking facilities, retail shops, night clubs, arcade facilities, billiards, ping pong, darts, meeting rooms, and similar uses. 2. The extent to which the text amendment would better implement and better achieve the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and Staff believes that the proposed text amendments to Section 12-2, Definitions, and Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, will further the goals and objectives outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan which are found in Section V of this memorandum. 3. The extent to which the text amendment demonstrates how conditions have substantially changed since the adoption of the subject regulation and how the existing regulation is no longer appropriate or is inapplicable; and The proposed amendments demonstrate that the code has many uses which are not defined nor identified as being permitted or conditional uses. Staff believes that a bowling alley is a use which is becoming more popular and one in which makes Vail a more year-round, active place for locals and tourists. 4. The extent to which the text amendment provides a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land use regulations consistent with municipal development objectives; and 43 The proposed text amendments to the Code allow the proposed development to include a land use which could bring year round activity to the Village which will be a draw for both locals and visitors. The addition of "bowling alley" as a conditional use will allow applicants to propose the use as part of a coordinated mixed-use development which will relate more harmoniously with adjacent properties and land uses. Staff believes that the proposed t~sxt amendments give the Planning and Environmental Commission the control necessary to regulate a use which could potentially be negative if not properly regulated. 5. Such other factors and criteria the commission and/or council deem applicable to the proposed text amendment. Before recommending and/or granting an approval of an application for a text amendment, the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Cour-cil shall make the following findings with respect to the requested amendment: (1) That the amendments are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and (2) That the amendments further the general and specific purposes of the zoning regulations; and (3) That the amendments promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residerniial community of the highest quality. C. Consideration of Factors Regarding Conditional Use Permits: ~. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. Multi-family Dwelling Units: The proposed project has six floors of condominiums comprising a total of 75 dwelling units. It is the number of levels which give this project its bulk and mass. Within Section 12-7E-1, Purpose, Vail Town Code, states: The Commercial Service Center District is intended to provide sites for general shopping and commercial facilities serving the Town, together with limited multiple- family dwelling and lodge uses as may be appropriate without interfering with the basic commercial functions of the District. The Commercial Service Center Districtf is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropri~~te to permitted types of buildings and uses, and to maintain a convenient shopping center environment for permitted commercial uses. The purpose statement anticipates that multiple-family uses could be located on properties zoned Commercial Service Center zone district as long as they do r-ot interfere with the primary commercial functions of the district. Staff believes the numt-er of proposed dwelling units does not interfere with the commercial nature of the zone district. There is a requirement in the Commercial Service Zone District limiting GRFA to 50% of the total floor area of a development, Section 12-7E-9, Density Control, Vail Town Code. The GRFA requested in addition to the limit identified previously is a 44 deviation which staff believes the public benefits within the proposal off-set. Staff would also point out that the land use plan for this site as contained in the Vail Village Master Plan does identify this site as being substantially high density multiple-family. The applicant has provided a plan which they believe encourages owners of condominiums to be involved in the rental pool. According to the applicant, the key to achieving the participation in a rental pool program is to emulate the management of a fine, high quality, luxury hotel. The management program is a hospitality program above all else. On-site management and management offices are a necessity. Top level services need to be provided to renting guests and owners alike. Great service and a first class property will attract the kind of clientele that not only can afford a fine resort but will respect the property of others. Owners become proud of being part of the resort and have confidence that their asset is being well cared for while producing a painless, welcome income to offset their ownership expenses (Attachment F). The level of service to be offered by Crossroads includes daily or twice daily maid service, 24-hour desk and concierge, bell and valet staff, local transportation service, pre-arrival activity, in-house amenities such as workout rooms, massage rooms, a lap pool, meeting rooms, and a world class lobby, ski and grocery service and premium rental equipment. An in-house maintenance staff not only quickly provides for guests needs but corrects problems in units before they become a major problem and expense to the renting owner. Owners become confident that their arrival will be hassle free and as enjoyable as a vacationing guest in spite of a renting guest occupying their unit the night before. The final piece to encourage owners to rent is creating a financial structure that strongly rewards owners -that rent. The cost sharing structure between the Homeowners' Association and the Rental Program needs to be an integrated program that equitably balances all of the services being offered to owners and renters alike. Properly and efficiently designed, owners will be financially rewarded for renting instead of carrying the service costs for all owners, as is the case in many condominium hospitality programs. Staff and the applicant have also provided a retail analysis of both Vail Village and Lionshead which we believe demonstrates that the amount of commercial space proposed to be constructed on the site does meet the purpose statement of the CSC zone district. ..The new Crossroads development would be approximately 19.6% (Currently 13.8%) of the total commercial square footage in the Vail Village. The report is attached for reference (Attachment H). Private Parkina Club: Staff believes that the proposal to establish a private parking club will address several of the goals and objectives established in the Vail Village Master Plan. Those goals are Goal #5 and Objective 5.1 as identified in Section V of this memorandum. Staff believes the parking club could have a very positive effect on the parking issues the Town faces through out the year. The proposal no longer identifies the parking club as a public benefit but as a public amenity which has indirect benefit to the community. Meeting Rooms Movie Theaters Maior Arcade outdoor operation of an accessory use (ice skating rink).and Bowling Alley: The Vail Comprehensive Plan identifies the need make the Village a more vibrant and economically viable location. Goal #2 of the Vail Village Master Plan, which is detailed in Section V of this memorandum, is positively addressed by these requested uses. 45 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Multi-family Dwelling Units: A great majority of the bulk, mass, and height of the proposed structure is generated by the six floors of condominium units. Previously staff believed that there could be sorne negative impacts on the neighboring residential portion of Vail Village Inn Phase III in terms of light and air as the proposed building encroached into the western setback. Since the January 18, 2005, Town Council meeting the proposal has been reduced in height and the building has been pulled out of the western property line setback with the exception of the enclosed loading and delivery bay. This change has greatly reduced the impact to the Vail Village Inn Phase III. As with any development on this site, there will be shade and shadow on the adjacent properties. However, the magnitude of sha~~e and shadow proposed is really no different on the adjacent property than if the building was constructed even a story or two shorter. Private Parking Club: Staff believes that the proposal to establish a private parking club will address several of the goals established in the Vail Village Master Plan. Those goals are Goal #5 and Objective 5.1 as identified in Section V of this memorandum. The private parking cluib, which is subterranean, will not have any negative impacts on the above listed criteria. Meeting Rooms, Movie Theaters, Maior Arcade, outdoor operation of an accessory use (ice skating rink), and Bowling Alley: The proposed uses will add to the recreation choices of locals and guests alike. Tl~e uses will also provide year entertainment choices. All of the uses proposed will be located in the subterranean portions of the structure except for the ice skating rink. The surface ice skating rink and the associated plaza is identified by the applicant as one reason why the building encroaches into the setbacks on a majority of the sii:e. Reducing the size of the ice skating rink would potentially allow the building to pull in from the property lines which could improve the impacts on light and air of the current structure. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive ar~d pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Multi-family Dwelling Units: The proposed 75 dwelling units will generate increased vehiculartraffic. The payment of the traffic impact fee and/or the construction of roadway traffic improvements to ttie South Frontage Road and Village Center Road will off-set any negative impacts. Private Parking Club: The proposed 92 space parking club will generate additional vehiculartraffic in the area. The payment of the traffic impact fee and/or the construction of roadway traflfic improvements to the South Frontage Road and Village Center Road will off-set any negative impacts. 46 Meeting Rooms, Movie Theaters, Major Arcade, outdoor operation of an accessory use (ice skating rink), and Bowling Alley: These proposed uses will generate increased vehicular traffic. The payment of the traffic impact fee and/or the construction of roadway traffic improvements to the South Frontage Road and Village Center Road will mitigate any negative impacts. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Multi-family Dwelling Units: The Purpose statement of the Commercial Service Center zone district identifies multiple-family dwelling units as a conditional use because the primary function of the district is commercial. It is primarily the impact of six floors of residential which give this project its bulk, mass, and height. While the applicant is proposing a building which exceeds the height limits in the Vail Village Master Plan this is caused by the 11 foot 6 inch floor plates proposed and the taller floor plate in the commercial floors to accommodate stadium seated theaters and'a bowling alley. If the Commission agrees that the 11 foot 6 inch floor plate is acceptable staff believes the proposal complies with this criterion. Private Parking Club: The proposed parking club is located within a completely subterranean structure. The subterranean nature of the parking club has no negative impacts on neighboring uses. Meeting Rooms, Movie Theaters. Major Arcade, outdoor operation of an accessory use (ice skating rink), and Bowling Alley: These proposed uses are located in the subterranean, except for the ice skating rink, portions of the structure and have little impact on .the visible portions of the upper portions of the structure. The surface ice skating rink and the associated plaza is identified by the applicant as one reason why the building encroaches into the setbacks on a majority of the site. Staff and the applicant have performed an analysis which depicts that the increased height and encroachments into setbacks are indeed created by the public plaza containing the ice rink as the amount of development potentially lost by establishing the public plaza is on the same scale as the height deviations and setback encroachments proposed within the project. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Commercial Service Center Zone District. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. 47 IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval with conditions to the Vail Town Council of the development application to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1. Staff's recommendation is based upon a review of the criteria and findings as outlined in this memorandum and from the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval with conditions of the applicants' request, staff recommends that the following findings be made as part of the motion: Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads "That the proposal to establish Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the Vail Town Code. Furthermore, the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission, based upon the testimony and evidence presented during the put~lic hearing, that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the developmE~nt standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits providE~d. Lastly, the Commission finds that the request is consistent with the developmE~nt goals and objectives of the Town. With regards to proposed building setbacks, that: a. Proposed building setbacks provide necessary separation between buildings and riparian areas, geologically sensitive areas and other environmentally sensitive areas. b. Proposed building setbacks comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations. c. Proposed building setbacks will provide adequate availability of light, air and open space. d. Proposed building setbacks will provide a compatible relationship with buildings and uses on adjacent properties. e. Proposed building setbacks will result in creative design solutions or other put~lic benefits that could'not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. With regards to proposed building height, that: a. Proposed building heights comply with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan. b. Proposed building height will adequately preserve views of the Gore Range from Vail Valley Drive. c. Proposed building height will provide a compatible relationship with buildings a.nd uses on adjacent properties. d. Proposed building height will result in creative design solutions or other public benefits that could not otherwise be achieved by conformance with prescribed setback standards. e. Proposed building height of 99.9 feet, while setting precedence, was mitigated by 48 the proposed public benefits, of which the provision of a public plaza on the site per the Town's Master Plans was the most offsetting element. That the proposed gross residential floor area of 182% of lot area, additional twenty- eightdwelling units over allowable (at 28.4 units per acre total), site coverage of 107, 772 square feet (93.6%) and landscape area of 42,255 sq. ft. (deviation from percent hadscape) in the Commercial Service Center zone district is in conformance with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Master Plan. That the development is in compliance with the purposes of the Commercial Service Center zone district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Vail Land Use Plan, and the Vail Streetscape Master Plan, and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the applicant's requests, staff recommends that the following conditions: The Developer shall address the following conditions of approval prior to appearing before the Vail Town Council for second reading of an adopting ordinance for the establishment of Special Development District No. 39, Crossroads: The Developer shall prepare a written agreement, for Town Council review and approval, outlining the responsibilities and requirements of the required offsite improvements, as indicated on the proposed Approved Development Plan. This agreement shall include, but not be limited to, all streetscape improvements along Village Center Road and East Meadow Drive, public access to the plaza for pedestrians and Town sponsored events, which may include the establishment of an easement on the plaza and language in the covenants and declarations for owners of property in the project regarding the use of the plaza for special events, inclusion of the loading and delivery facility in the overall loading and delivery system, payment of traffic impact fees and credits given to offset fee, and details for funding public art. 2. That the approval of the conditional use permits and text amendments are not valid unless an ordinance approving the_ associated special development district amendment request is approved on second reading. 3. The Developer shall submit a fire and life safety plan for review and approval by the Town of Vail Fire Department. 4. The Developer shall submit a revised site and landscape plan indicating a larger landscape island located at the porte cochere entry to the proposed building for review and approval by the Design Review Board. 5. The Developer shall submit a final exterior building materials list, typical wall section, architectural specifications, and a complete color rendering for review and approval of the Design Review Board, prior to submittal of an application for a building permit. 6. The Developer shall submit a rooftop mechanical equipment plan for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit. All 49 rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the overall design of the lodge and enclosed and visually screened from public view. 7. The Developer shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Design Review Board. The Developer shall address the following conditions of approval prior to submitting a building permit application (a grading permit/excavation permit shall constitute a building permit); The Developer shall receive all the required permits from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) prior to submitting for a building permit. Failure to receive the appropriate permits to access the South Frontage Road per the ApprovE:d Development Plan will require the project to return through the special development district review process. 2. The Developer shall addresses the written final comments of the Town of Vail Public Works Department outlined in the memorandum from the Town of Vail Public Works Department, dated April 22, 2005, prior to submitting an application to the Town of Vail Community Department for the issuance of a building permit for this project.. 3. The Developer shall submit a written letter agreeing to install a public safety rac'lio communications system within the subterranean parking structure which meets the specifications of the Town of Vail Communications Center. The specifications and details of this system shall be submitted to staff for review and approval with the . application for a building permit. The Developer shall address the following conditions of approval prior to requesting a temporary certificate of occupancy or a final certificate of occupancy; The Developer shall be assessed a traffic impact fee of $5,000 per net trip increase in p.m. traffic, or $345,000. The construction of the South Frontage Road improvements by the Developer, as indicated on the Crossroads Public Improvements Plan, shall satisfy this requirement. 2. The Developer shall post a bond to provide financial security for 125% of the toi:al cost of the required off-site public improvements. The bond shall be in place with the Town prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy. This includes but is not limited to the proposed streetscape improvements. 3. The Developer shall commence initial construction of the Crossroads improvements within three years from .the time of its final approval at second reading of the ordinance establishing Special Development District No. 39, and continue diligently toward the completion of the project. If the developer does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the special development district or any stage of tf~e special development district within the time limits imposed, the approval of said special development district shall be void. The Planning and Environmeni:al Commission and Town Council shall review the special development district upon submittal of an application to reestablish the special development district following the procedures outlined in Section 12-9A-4, Vail Town Code. 50 4. The Developer shall provide deed-restricted housing that complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13) for a minimum of five (5) beds generated by the redevelopment of Crossroads, and that said deed-restricted employee housing shall be made available for occupancy, and that the deed restrictions shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Crossroads project. The required Type II or III deed-restricted employee housing units will be regulated by the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13). The applicant shall purchase and deed restrict the employee housing beds prior to requesting a temporary certificate of occupancy. The units purchased must be approved as acceptable by Town staff and deed restricted as Type II or III units depending on the zone district in which they are located and by the appropriate review process. The developer shall have the right to participate in any pay-in-lieu program, if one is established by the Town, if he/she so chooses. Participation in a pay-in-lieu program shall occur prior to requesting a temporary certificate of occupancy. 5. The approval of SDD No. 39 shall restrict the uses upon the plaza level tenant spaces to retail uses solely and shall not be utilized for professional offices; business offices, and studios. The second floor retail space may be utilized for any allowable or conditional use as listed in the Commercial Service Center ,Zone District. No space noted as retail space on the Approved Development Plan shall be converted to a residential dwelling unit. Temporary real estate sales offices may be allowed on the plaza level of retail during the first two years following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy in order to allow effective sales of dwelling units on-site. Text Amendments: The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval of the text amendments to Town Council based upon the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the findings below. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the applicant's request, staff recommends that the following findings be made as part of a motion: 1. That the amendments are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and 2. That the amendments further the general and specific purposes of the zoning regulations; and 3. That the amendments promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. Conditional Use Permits The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's requests for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of an outdoor operation of the accessory uses as set forth in Section 12-7E-5 (ice skating rink); a major arcade to include indoor entertainment; a theater, 51 meeting rooms, and convention facilities; multiple-family dwellings and lodges; and a private club (92 parking spaces) to allow for the establishment of a for sale parking club, pursuant to Section 12-7E-4, Vail Town Code, located at 141 and 143 Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block ~iD, Vail Village Filing 1. Staffs recommendation of approval is based upon the review of i:he criteria described in Section VIII of this memo and the evidence and testimony present~:d. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the applicant's request, staff recommends that the following findings be made as part of a motion: That the proposed locations of the use is in accordance with the purposes of t:he conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the distric1l in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed locations of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Reduce plans of the proposal dated March 28, 2005 C. Vail Village Master Plan: Conceptual Building Height Plan D. Vail Village Master Plan: Land Use Plan E. Applicant's Employee Housing Unit Proposal F. Applicant's Rental Program Proposal G. Public Works memo dated April 22, 2005 H. Retail Analysis Dated April 12, 2005 I. Public Notification J. Letters from Public 52 _,. ~ .'t+. ~.. h _ _ ~ S --~ ~ ' . ~ ., :, ", ~y, ....-~ La+»'~: ~r-r ; -.:"r~Fr~r, v".~ y,. . ~„ 'R :~~.zA. ~. _ •~~~ s~'~`~~--`=+°~~"~"_'31-. ~ r~~'f-~',~.. j~}~~y .. , .:,. ~.... ~_ k. °. n1T 1~ ~~ • ~ _ - ~ - ~ ~ :... i `,- 1 _ Crossroads Proposed New Special Development District #39,- ~y ~ , '~ ~r~ Text Amendment and conditional .Use Permit Requests ~ ~> -, .~~:; Planning `and Environmental. Commission April 25, 2005 . - - __ _ _ +-•'~ _l1~ '~~~ .~{~~-- ~ ~ ~' ^ j4 ~. Y~•..,~~` _.n. i ~+~~~~fr4 ~ r~4 ... S~'`neX~i _ - `Y l _ _ _ .,ail ~ _ r .. r .1~: ..F YrJ ( _ t ~~• \Jy;< - ~~r K•"~ ~~'_~~ `~ ~ i -~.~ fi yy ^ :.~ ~ ~: k~ ,.~ rn. E ",~~~~~ ~ alts'. -- ~ ~r~ ~ f~`~'. ~ `~ :;'~'7"~ ~~~1 ~' '~T'.'-"{ - r c ar '~ ~ C-; ~ ;;, , .. _ r '~~ _ °', ~„ ~y ~ ~ _5.....o-% / 1 n~ - ,, ,~,/i ~ ~ ; , "~_ _ , . ~.. _~" ,! i, I ~~ ' ~ ~~ t ,1. ~', _ n' t ~ ;jam ~',~ ~ " t~ ~: -~. ~ ~ ~.~ :.. i I , yam.. ; ( ~1. ~ ~ y ., ~'~ ,h -~___ ~'~ ~ ' .~~ ~c ~ ~~ ~ 4r~j a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~yyy~,J ~ , i r ~ y ~ ~`,~, f j ~f' ~~ ,Ty,,, ~y , y. 5 v,5~. ~ ~ I J ~ ~,• r 5 1 (~ N~ ~ 5 ~ t q,`~~,` '~ ! it~ ~: . .,r+~r.~+~1~_ 'fJA";Cr~`~ ~~T t y~' `'~~ ~ ~ Y ,~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ,j~~"r.`_.~ .'t f ~ .' , 1 ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ .. ~~ ~ ° ~. .., r .. - .. i d~ ,. ~ ~ _. ~~ ., r u ~.~~ e r' _ G. A~ f r ti •• _~ ,., ,~,~ U ~ ~ ! _ r~r r~ ~"l~ _ iii. .t. ~; '~~ ~F x~_ ~ ~. {~.~.,' _ ~dr.'. -._~ " r°_ ~~~'~ 3 r _ } ~v' , ~ ' Y~ `' - •, -~ . i•:t ,k ~ ~,~!~. ~ ~ ~ ~. p , fem.-:, .p, -~?~ `' V~' ~ a-'.. ~'S' '~l ~ ,f,~~"~ ~'~. ~ ~ , _{ !~ ,~P~. ~j,~~ ~ _ 1 <'.ff i 1~ ;'~a.,~,•,~~-4~'f~. . - . ~ Jt y ,' ~ ~ fi - i~ X ~J 1~ _ ~,+, :: . «~ r xar t .. ~ :e' Al ,~ 4. , a ~ . ~. '+ _ ~ _. _ a... ~ .. .: .r_ .-, This me was ~ ~ ~ ... - ,.. ... - .., ® 50 0 50 Feel P created by the Town of Vail GIS Department. Use of This map should be for general purposes only. 1 " - 100' The Town of Vail does rot warrant the accuracy of the information mnuined herein. (parcel line work is appmzimate) CROSSROADS REDEVELOPMENT VAf L, COLORADO ~~,~. P.,~~::uxP~w~~~~a.~w.: ~.~.~..~~..~_. ~~, ~ BARNES COY ARCHITECTS 1. ~Ar[hi[ is D r+ v n rn CROSSROADS VAIL, COLOFW"~ ;'.. . 'irk ' fi n9.~ _ /~~ ~_ .~w. _~ ~ tm ~ 7 - ~- _ ` '~---__ -~`_ -~--. - .r. ~~n.. ~,. - _ ~ <\ t~ +y j ,~~"~~ra-~ ~~_ ___ --- __ _ to ~{~ ''~__ ~ ~7C~~Af\~ ~.• t}CS~~~• \ .~ ~ ~C~ ' ~~C r ~'~ ~ ~ t15? f ~Vr _- NTAGE ROAD __ ___- '_-~_ f~k ~- ~1AJ~' S.t Y I _~1_ viiuce W n ~ ."K~\' 7 4~ ~ f~ S !! ~ . f, F -o ~_ \ `~ / N lAiq l/ 1 ~~' "~ ~'~ F - ~, , r ~ \ ~,Z ~~~~ PLAZA STfE PLAN WCfH ICE RINK CROSSROADS VA14 COLORADO ~ \\~F ~ RARKWG 3TRUCTUgE OPTIONAL ROUNDABOUT DESIGN BY OTHERS " a..~woHa ~`r ~ .w~a~~m ~ F' ' ~ , ~- , - -_\ I II!Ii _I Y ~ ~l ~ ~~ 1 tl ~; ' Ir~ ~ ~~_ , 1 : f ~~ ~\` ~~, '_ --y 1 +'~CLIGE WN pIwTA r-i ~~~ L~ ~ _ i '' ~ .y r - ~ !-- - ~ . 1 ~ '' ~.~ ~ n"~°~~ t x'71. 1 + ~~ \ __ ~ + Fj 3 a`~t~y ~ 1 1~ h41 .- , ~ + ~, ~ , -~1s,.: ~r~l ~ I r -~. ~~ ~- ~'~' n z :t5y~ - l~ ~ ~ '• V~ x 4 ~ ~l-.. Ic 'r' ~. ac ~ ~. ~ SP 5!A i CROSSROADS VAIL, COLORADO 1 ~~~• ~ _ MEDIANS AND-HEALED .~ -_-~ ~ ~ ~.. -_ ~ SIDEWALK FUNDED BYE--== - _ __ - f"'- + i. ' ~. CROSSRQADS ~ '- )T;\ kK- }w~fi "SIFU '- 500 NF AQ S.G ~~"`~ •• S - --_ ~ ~ _-` -- ~- ~~' -ti -'r-. ;~i - zc =4 ~~~ -.~ LL LY 7 F~~~ 1 ~1 / _ ~ ~ '_ ~~ '-_.. I ~ -z 5 1 ~ 4 ~~ x, -~-~ _ -~ ~- \\'+ 'j ~ pia rl ~ ~ _"~~_ -1 STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND-HEt\TED~ 1 i' 1 ' ~ = c ~,~~~ ~. SIDEWAtK`F11NDEq:.@Y.CRQSSROlgS \ \ ;;-~}~ 1'.1_ ~I ~~.~ ---- -z~ =~~~= `~+~- x y ~~ ~*`'~`~~ ~~ ~ ~ v `may ~ ~ `' ' ~ +- '{ ~ _~l- -- t I ~, -t T'_~- "'1~ 1 .. 1 PARKING ST ~~1= T: ~ + - ~ STRE~LCAP~ IMPROVgGME_NTSAND:_HEATED rj ~ I ~ - / ~, RuGTUr,E T~~~_~ ~ ~ ~+ i~ 1 SIOEWACI~~FUNDED BY CROSSROQ.pS~ ~1' ' J 1~~ r/ a ~-~=-.~~, .- 4 '.--/~; "~ - \ /1t ~ 4~~~'`_` --~~ / v r1 ~ 1 .slur ~~ {'~'~ +,$; ' \ ~ \ "~--~"'---~~. /// ~ ~ ~~~= ~ it / i o,s c L ~! FAxE YE. • 1 ~~\ ~4 ~ ~f ~ f ~j'lyy ~~~~ I ~ E~ ~ `. +-~~ I r -`~~ ~ 511 i~` ~<i '~~~' I 5 - 4~ xe ~~`~~ 'K3"~`~ ~' I~\ ~ ry~~ TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY ", ,. _v'tu ~;yb ~- ~ ~"'^-~ ''~ ~r'l~r~'' ~"`\ TOWN Of VAIL -i ! „- ~ - -_' _ - 1~ ~ J ¢ ~~. I ~ NE ' - ~- ~i i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w 1 EASTMEAOOY OIEIY-II ~ .. } ) '1 ~,~~Yi t ' ~ ~ >. ~ --a=~~~=_ t -~ ~ - + ~ . ~ `l <~ _ ~~ ~ t_ ~' _ -- --~- "" " - tL ail ~.. ~ E.rro ~~ ~ ~~~1 4;' ~'• ~ _ i ' ~ I r ~''+~ ~ \ R + _ _ ` 1 ~! ,~ ~+ f `., ...~ ~ ~\;Ir_~~- "~w'°"~e ~fulf~~~r~~,~,~1~1r,. ~ ~ / a REQUIRES GOOPERATIOtJ _ --' ~1 ~-'C {'~~ I iu~ " d3~ . ~ ~t Sao _ a . }~ W6 E C ~ ~\ 1 , ' i ~, 1 ~~ 'h., / °'~'~rt I4'1{j4~ Ece++tc: I TH-VILLP:G_ ENTER i • '_ i 9~ + ~, + .,,~y,. ~.~.. ,=` - - ~ IMPROVEMENTS~~_. ~ I,; ,. ', / -+~l}~y~'I N~~ ,.. ,~- _ _ + --- ~ ~--1-=` -----1 ~``k 4 ~.L t:~ --J ~, FUNDED BY;ONE sws cNUer i ! 1~ ~ I~a```• `TO BE. FUNDED BY ONE '~ +' ~~ ~w l __~ WILLOW PLACE \ --, t!~v ".,,, ~~ ~ ~,,_~~ dsl'j ~ 'WILLOW PLACE ' ;;'~ ~ ~{ ' -4 et ~ ~:, ; . ~ ~' I ` , TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY '~ ,sY '" ~~ ~~ -w? t j; l . TOWN OF VAIL AND OTHERS ~ _ ~~ 1 _ , ,. ~, S F~s~µ~ '. ,. ~. " ~', ~ CROSSROADS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PLAN :e ~' T ~~ , , ~ ~ tee.,.,„~ BARNES COY ~!. .,. `:-~, ~ ~ ARCHITECTS .ARna - -.., .s} . a~~ : - MAa~., tea. ~oo~ LEGEND pry E%ibTWC OECIDUWS TR Y EES v I(G EMISiINO SPRVCC LREES \4~ I~ ~II` OECiWOYB 1REE5 '~yYi~l' ;(,~~ ]s UCE TREES z ' F, ~ 20'-25' EVERCRCEH tR EfS ?dU DRNAMFMAL tgEES\S«RUBS rsp s«RUe PLANiINCs '~S-L~^~ PERENNWS/ GROUND C OKR PLANTING SCHEDULE Ni FIC NAPE NsME OtY. Si2E REYMRS DEC 000U5 iR ES t ou.<« v.me c ASPF» 5'-]0' BBB SleMad SPRUCE TRCES PA pd COLOgA00a SPRUCE PK.o eb sa COLORADO SPRUCE 26 ID 20'-25 JS -RD' BkB 31ok~d BkB Bldked Plp~a er arem BR SiLECONE PINE 6 20''25' BYB Slo.ed ORNAIAENTAL RfFS SHRUBS M G NN.wnouAPLE I• /IS B Rt. G SASKATDON SEAVICFBERRY Ca o lnwro 'Bl Y ' 19 /5 e' 1t' Ml. CH ry ue S1 p NiSl BLUE SP RU Cota l B b t9 /3 e'-1R' HL PO neoa er onson l• SPRE+O NC COtONEASIER PH aacor us p ul i 'D El JI /5 e" 11' ML Pf y p p us o p o Ou0L0 NN ,ESRI( Polanu to Ir 1 /5 le'-1~ HI. eae POiENTLL1Ae l l 95 /5 Ie" 2~ Hl. CB o on celorod u COLD a PADO CODCwn00 an Cernus seN a 9o s ' I] /5 B"-2s" NL cs y oeNLEr oocwooo om . eien ',e u ~ 9 /s e' 2i HL ~ . LSWTI DOCwOOp eu > n R 11 /5 10' 2~ HI. PC w m GOL DEN CURRAM rums uate 23 /5 e'-2t' HI. S no URPLE LEY 5/.NOCMERRY J tJ Y5 le^ 21' N1. I iABIE TOP aOILE JUN PER i ]B /5 tb" 21' Sp. Yop INiATURE YUCO IOI /5 to"-2r' ML. 1 FN~NNV,LN O GROUND CODER SELECTION i0 BE COORO NAEEO OSCAPE MCiOR 2 ifRMCE PUNTERS SH411 NAVC A NNNUN SOIL DEPiN DF b" FOR S«RU06 AND PERENNULS ANO ]b" FOR TREES CROSSROADS VAIL, COLORADO SOUTH FR_ pNTq ~_ icw ~~~,_ __ -~ -5 Y P IN eED _. _ _ _ -__ r5 ~_SI.C _ ~~J' r D a -' - _ _ _ , yyyCCC ~~~PERFNN _! -~~~'.-4~_~^ / PUNTING eFD ~~~_ 1 5^ ` I ^ ~ 1}( r J ~ ~ T ^~ ~rZ~' 1 I.. ~ rf g1 `~ c~ ~~ ~, '-i 1 ~ P ~y5"' r PARKING STRVC}URE ^f/~ ' / PR J v,~~ ~ . I LA l L'us r:r~- f ~ A ~, P _ rk ~zr~-m~ ~M /^~' a TsFlab-rii' Ptt.-Ti'•7.T :s:n.rc \, -> ._ 1 ',~Ft~ '-'/," ~' RA iL`l~ i .: i.cr -- l d e-_. rr ~ F _il, _. 1 0 f iJI` I ~ 2CH ''f~`` \~ \\ ~ ~~ / }. ~ ~I ~ ~I 1 I ~ \ I~ JI/ \ 0.~ l L ! I ~]Pi~/~ ~ 1f3; ~ ~~ Ir 1 I vA~ )P°H55z l L \ r ;~ ~ I, ~~ SPY ~ ,,_ N'L..t r .~ PF ,~ Ss y #3 ~~. n. ii `f.r. ~fJfH .' Ytf :. }>-T L _ 11[/ I I _.. ) 1\ ~iMEA00 ~'i~'Z.fI ~~~~ja} !'.-IP ~L_ i W DRIVE p1~ ~ ~ P ~, I : P:. . - ~- F; f y. \. 1 II. I ~ \ ~ I~.\ NR'SS CRAIET _ 1 S 1 I ` S .~ F4. ~~ 1 _ ~ ~ _~_ ~ .f ~ tt r ~t~ ~ ~ ~~. ~1 V =Y "~ F~1 =~~t~ rp ~,~`; ~y ~~j q 1; y ,, iz PPF .. s NwL PLAM NCS "TlN I I \ S'' i c-n-y VRERb V +:I~I n'IP..' ,^,~ ! , ,' I {1~ 1 5 E '1 !/ i '-I J F_1~ I N ' _ _J 1 I1 I d ill tJ i::: -. 2~ ~~yy~ - -_ _ f ,~ _.. ~ - f v "I vc ~NDSCtAPE PLAN BARNES COY '~ f~ P f © / g ~ ; ARCHITECTS ~ ~ - s A2n¢ E3 ~~z ~ M,.~~., mod. moo, LEGEND q ~y { fiSTWG DECIDUOUS iR )A EES- '~ F115iWC SPRVCE 1AEE5 DEODUWS TREES ~~ J5'-M' SPRUCE TREES a0'-25' EVERGREEN TRC ES , 0 NAUENIK TRFfS\SMROBS SHRUB PIMTNGS . PEREHNYALS/ OROUNO LOVER PLANTING SCHEDULE STU S[IENDFIC NWE CODUON NNA OTT. SITE ELWtkS D CIDl10U5 TREEB T Pppwullll„ a uld G ASPEN EU IBa 3.5•-].O' BsB $IpIYC U[E TREES PA Pt PB Piceo oWU COLORA-0 SPRUCE Piceo pElee COLORADO SPRUCE Pinw oHelolo BR SRECONE PNE 26 tO 6 30'-ZS ]5'-10 20' a5' Bd8 s1pFe0 Bk8 fi1pMeC BkB SIp4eE ORIUUnENTAL TP HRUDS Ace. ginnpio CiNNAU NAPIE Ip /IS NI. kAT00N SERNCEBFRRx ap y5 IB'-3.• HL I C Coryopterle In a 'BNe ulsl' CH OWE nisi SPIPfA neo l bl t8 IS tB'-2e' HL PO s ti or aen u s EEFD NC coraNEASRO PN exor u e In t n ]I ys - B' 21•. PF p p~ e w o Y OLABLO'NINEHARN tenUt I t ] /5 tB'-2i Ht CC o rv cpep POTEMW Com ml e 55 /5 tB" 3•" Ht ee oA e on co wo ,. coWRAOOpoocwooo ~~ eo.e~. e.N . eo ey a /5 te• ar HL. cs BNLEr ooc o00 cem~. elo un eM .p Ys le• a.• m M sANm Docwooo Ribe 13 /s 3A• HE PC s ou GOIOEN Cu P 41 ~ 35 /5 -3. H JS iunw e en PURPIF-LEAF SANOCHEARY I] /5 -21 N uni0ercw JTABIE TOP BWFpJUNWFA 'u ]B /5 B•-3~ Sp. muge INIALVPF YuGO IDS /s tB'-aA• Nl. I.RDS!~F`TfS' 1. FINAL PFREeINVy AND GROUND COVER SEIECTNT! TO BE COORDINATED RH LWOSCAPE CO MCiOR. a. RRFACE PUNIFAS SHALL HAVE A u4JI4UU SOIL DEPTH Of ]0• FOR SHRUBS AND PfliENN4i5 AND ]fi• FOR TREES. CROSSROADS VAIL, COLORADO ~', ,_,~ ~~' ' ~~ ~ _ ~ _.._,. =GI„/ PARKING STRtN:TURF T TOTAL ON-SIR SORSGPE ~ t5.]36 50 R. LESS MEAS UNDER ]00 s.F. - -a2B 50. fT. D TOTU ON-SIR HAADSCAPE ~ 3l.]5T 50 R. AoaTwNU oFF-srtE uN c I..al0 so. n. LANDSCAPE AREAS BARNES COY - ARCHITECTS u, >' h` a -I F3 ~ ___t. ~~: ,r£'"L 7.pr ~~~ :' ~" '^A~,y 1 ~ !I, I ~ J 1 y Yi`I } tL h I I \~ ~ ~ ~ / , \ • , r~ l a. I ~ i . ~: _ ; ~' .. ~ `~--s _e __.. ~_ _ . ~ ..:.DOW ORNE _~ , \~ ~' y ~ i _ ;Y ~rf. `~~~( ~~. ~ 11 ~\~\ \ \\~ -A ~_ ~_ ~~ ] ~~PNONTAGE~ ~ _ i //- - - I - - - - - - - - 000 ~ ~ -- --~ „ 1m m ., ., ,,. ~ , .. ., 01 ., ~ .. ., ., .. , ., .. ., u ., ~ -- ----- ^ o ^~ I Q.~ , I 1t} y ~UP •(~ PUBLIC PARKING SPACES I I QJ I 111 ~ , I 4 ~.~ I 1 ' J + _ ~ 'I~ _ I _ I 1 ~ o f I m ~ 1 1 0 0l ~ ~1 1 w I ~ ~ , - ~ ~ i 1 awsn ~ ~ MECHANICAL / i*\ ~ ROOM / ~ / ~ / / / ELEV LOBBY ~ / / ELEV LOBBY ~ ~ / ~ / ~'I ~ / ~ ~ // ~_ ' / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~/ j 1~ /r+~f ~j it / /„ ~ 1 ff~~ 1I1 ~ 1 BOWLING ALLEY % r 1w ~ GATE ~ i ABOVE ~ x ~ PRIVATE PARKING SPACES 1 " % ~... 11\v ~ u \zc \ n\w\1\ v\~ a1\ ss\ v~,? \~ n~\.o\ 3s\ s\ a\\\ I \ Y'/ ' ~ ~ ~ 0 1 v~ 6 PARKW~gONTROL GATE 1\ 33 .y~, r':~ PRIVATE PARKING SPALEB ' ~ \ tx ~ p ~ u~ n/ u ~3 / 9 1w ~o1 1 ~ . 1 la 9 ~ / ~ / 1 C~L ~v / ~~/w / tu~ ~~u / NY ~50 , t ~ /' t ~f ~Sb I t5L ~w O y~ ~ ~ / / 1w / / / / / % / / / / / / / /~ ~~ ~e.F v l O 33B TOTAL PARKING SPACES 1` 1» f ~ CE RINK M1IELHANICAL 111 3~ VV~~Y E pgy,5~ PUBLIC PARKING SPACES `~ PUBLIC PARKING SPACES 1 I 1 ;i~, I 1 1 I I / / 1 ,M ~ ,o. 1 / ~ ~ ~. /~ ~ ~a ~~10 ~~11 % z,1 ~ 11. ~ 116 I f I / - I ,~ 111. ~;.; 1 /'. .~ ~. / __= -- ---~-PU'oLIC RESTROOMS ~ PARKING LEVEL 3 (+8152.34' DATUM) ~' ~ ~ '~~ CROSSROADS k .sa BARNES COY ~ ,` vAtL,coLORAOO ~ ARCHITECTS '.. A¢M[ L3 i i~fa~/ ,~ cROSSROA~s VAIL, COLORADO ~ "` ,, ~ ~ ~ ..,.,~ ~'~. `a` ~ ~ ,. ~ n i p ~P~ i i - ;, ~ ~ i ' ~ ---- ~., rN .~.~ ~`~~1~;viu= r ~~, ~~, ~~> ~; ~ ~ MKS `% \\ i _ ME.P'~ i ~~ r E ~%~~ ~.----°~r----- ----- ~- ?C.k ~ ~'u~~% PSG _ ~~ ~ it ~...~\ l jg ~ C11JJ 5.39' DATUM:BARNES COY ~ , - ARCHITECTS _ .Arcn;c c: M..a~.. tea, zoe~ ~l t t ~_ tF r~ f I/ ~ rF r~tt 't * ~ I I I I :e n I ~ n ~ z. ~ ~ a :i m i ~. /~ . ~ m.,.~l..,..~,~. ,.k ' II ~,i6w ~ c ~ . ~ ~ ~ }} FF F1 F t { LFF. `< ~ o~ ~~ t Y F I ~ t I ~ rp ~~, I ~ f t k ~ 1 1~~f r~~l'`~ JV ~ fl ~ ~ II ~ ~ -; ~ r' i\:; ' ~ ^i emu. ;) ' 1 1 ~ II n 1 ..~..-..,- ne... +~e.pl ~~~ i~. ~ ~1~ ',111 ~ ~~~ill, ~ 1~~lI~~ ~~~~I~ i~n ~;ir- ~,ul ~~ .~.,~"" ~~I ~~~ \ .I ~ JSI!F~' I ~It'~i.l ~' / a~,u. / ~~ \\ a\ \ _ _-~ ,r ~~\_ ab. , / 111 ~~ _ ,{1-~1 ~~ ~I ~~ a~N, 1 S 1, 1i ~ ~~{±` ~..~ 1i ~ `a°a ~\,,'.. ;''ift l~'~ti~\` I t^~`i~ ~ _ y~~T.1 /Y ~ {=i.` ~~.: ~ ~ry 4~~1 ' ~~ t~ ,-Y ~` '{)fir ~Ii ~\ I. ~ / /~ l;-~~1i ~'1~~~ // yir ~` ~ ~ ~\.~il \~r.: ~ r ACS -- ~'~~ i I ~ _~~ , ate.. ~, ,; .-~h~ 1 ,. ~~ ~ " :~~'v, •' ,~ ~ ,'I- ~ ~~'~ _' 'I/ '~`~I l„rl~ ill ~ I ~lh! ` ~~~; ~• i ~ : L / ~,~~~ ,I 1 ; ;~.. .T -Ir-.gal ~ ~ ~y~l~-_,~r.; ~ - ~~~~j''II : ~L~~ ~ ~\ I 1 ~ f I ~ i~ __ ! I A~N~ ' ~ I c 7 -~ - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ . -- - ' I _ _, - ._ ~ - - C ~ ~ !-5=~ -~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~F I - - _ -.__._ - --"- ,. -_-~ `~` i __ I o o - ,_ `,` ~ _-_l ,_ _ - --- 1 ~ - ---- -- -- v I~ ~i ~ ~ - -~ _ CROSSRDA~S ~ .. - = _ " - ~ -~.,11 __t r;~~ -~~ `.~ y~ ~ ;` PARKING LEVEL 1 AND RETAIL (+6179.34 DATUM) B VAIL, COLORADO ~ ~ ~ '°" ' s.o ARNES COY -- i.' ,t, ARCHITECTS ~' ~ ,~~ .ARnlc ~ SOW DRIVE ~ ~ _- %/ , 9 ~ . r] , -~-,,- - ~ . - 1 ~ . r~ ~~ .~ ~~~ I ~ k ~ 1v G ~ ~ F- ---- - ----- --- -~ --- -- - - - - - --- - --- -- - ~ `~ - ~ ~ '~ ± iii ~; ~_ ~~ `~ ' 2~ ~6 ' ~ - ~ ~~ ~~7 ;1f7b6r - - it ~~~~~I ~Il~~~~i~~~ii~. _ iT - i - °-~"u?,f v v '~ "`~'"' ® -~G?'g°I,r Imo' ~'/ _ ~; ~/ ~I' ":TAI --7'-_- -4'- ~~ / ~~d N ~ O O /~~~G ® ~ , -~. / ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 -~~- X ~ ~ - ` ~ \ 1 .. L c + n - 1. ~,~ 11 \ ~ ~ ~ _ ____ _ " . ~ o~o~`,~~ ~ (per ,, ~ e ___. ~~ ~ --- ---- APO 7JJ kk -- - ~ VAIL, COLORADO ~ONDO 2 LEVEL (+8203.89' oA'ruMy ~ BARN ES COY ~~ 1B ONIrS TNLS LEVEI ~~ ~ ARCHITECTS :c.~s= .A2na L5 ~~ 2 LOCK-OFFS TNLS IEVEL G~ \1 _ ~ ~; - 4 \~ '~ .'~t_.-___ ~'' - ~ t _ _ //`.. r ~ - ~4 ~~i - ~ ~8 l~ - ° F °° ,~ -- ~- ~~ ,, ~4° ~ °° ~~ ~ ~ --- '• - .: ~. _;-~ -- - __ ~~ Y (,~~. \I i __ _ ~, _ ~= 1= II _ ', :~~; 31 ~1~/ - = --- = ------~ ~' ~: I CROSSr^cOADS i VAIL, COLORADO - - -- _ -- ~--- _ ,. ~,~ ~ ~, ~,~ 6. y. ~ ` ;~ ~~ ;; `1 n ~ ~- , V _______.__-___.-~._ I. - ~ ~ -V ~/r ~-- _ a n ~2 4~ Q ~~ ~~ ~ i __ ~ '' ~~ to ~ _ ~ ;~ - ~ ~` ~~G;~, i li~i~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ . ~ _ ~ ~° - ,~~,~;ii~, ~i _ ~ I ~~ .I ,.~ i n~ I. j ~IU, ; - y.;, „~ '; __ O -- ~--_ ~- ~II~ . f e~ ~~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ;~ ~ ~ .a.-- ~ . .~.-- - ~~ ~uG - ~ v ~;~ __ O~~J -- - OOH ~PS~ CEP _ ~~ c=A'~~~~ - CONDU 3 LEVEL (+8215.34' DATUM) BARNES COY ~. ; ~ -~ L5 UHITS THIS LEVEL ARCHITECTS ~~~~~~~ 3lOCK~OFFS THIS LEVEL - ~' }... ~~ L _~~ ~~r ~~~ ~ -- ,~ .._- ~ - _ ~~, ~~ .. -~-~~ ~y , ~~' {~ ,~ - ~ - ~rr ~ i. ~ J _r ~ ~ t - ~~-, _ ~' >, - ~ ~T~ -''-- ~ 1 ~ ~ -.r ---'---^'-- c~_'--~-' f!- - T! `/ ~, ~ ~ s /'~ / - ~~ ®~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ i ~~ t: . %~ ~; ' ~ i I j lief I ; _ .~ _ ~~~ ~"~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ... tt ' I d oo I ~i .~ i .~, . 4,p _ _ _ i ~ i 4~ ~~ - ~I i III ~ ~II - - - ~'~ _ ~ ;o -- __ - ~~s~' ' ~ ^~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ /III \s'. j-' ,,, i vaa,coLOaaoo '~`YY~, W 2 ' 1!! ~IIC ~ \~4 ~~~ OOV v Q~ / / MEP PSG E ~I CONDO 4 LEVEL (8226.84' DATUM) BARNES COY J vunrrs rrs u=ve~ ARCHITECTS „• !~~~~Aichi[ is z~oce-oF~s rHa uv~ M..kc~. ze. zoos ~ ~~ .~ t ~~~ ~ ~ ~. ~~-- - ~ - 3 ° x ~~? ~~~ ~~ -, E_ ,~ K _ -- 1 - ~. _~ 'il Ilil~ ~ -- ® , ~,$® _ - ` ® ~ ,n,~~ 1 Il,l~illi-= __ @,~3 a • \\\°. I'o o I ; ~I tee" w ~ I ®® I ~I ®.. _ , ~.~. j ®® ~~ Cr20SSROl~DS VAIL, COL00.4D0 t` ~ ijPj - -:- .F- I~~,a n~ ~ ~ .~~ ~ If~dlarl e ,-f ~ / ~ 7 {~]7 ®® ®e _ I i I~ III' 'i'~~ ~ ~ I I I'II j ~'i i ~~ I.I i; :I; 'lili I ;nln ~~~~~n ,~ ~~. ~' . _ - o- _ ---- .._ ~~~ _ ~ -. --.. ~ ~~-0~ ~ _ x~ -_ __ ~ «~ ;,; 68 ~ __~ ~ ~~® a'i'`;` x `~'~" ~ / ~ .~. ~ ~ sr- ,yam 1, ri i _. .~I~R . "1" 1 f °~ 0 ,. ~ ~~~ 6~ e~..: 5~ ~ .' 11 _ o ~( OJ 0 w z w U g J > II °aL~L ~~ ~u~ j ~ ,. I~ _. -~" o~N O~~ EPS~ ~~P ~~ CONDO S LEVEL (+8238.39' DATUM) BARNES COY "°NRSTMISIFVEL ARCHITECTS Z LOCK-OFF TMLS LF/EL t I ~ AKhI[ t5 ~~ MAa~.. tea. ~oo~ - ~ ~ .~.,- ' ~ . il - RFrt .i l_ - - - - --- - - ~ I ~ I~ i~t - -li _ l jlili'l ~ X11 = ,~ .~ ~~~~. I i l l - - - - ~ _ ~ 1 ~ a ~ ~ __ ; ;~ - ' ~ ,,~ it _ 'r,~. - - ' ~- f ~ I~- .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i°I I II~ I~ II~'~I! II' li''!I~il~l i'(~li~ i~~il III - iII Il III' ~l~i~~i I i I i ~ ~ ~ ~li 'I I~ ;,~ ~il '!I _ -~ - -_ - = _ _ ~ i ~ :~ ~,~ llj I~j~ll II ~il~ I ~~ ~I i ~~~~,~~~~~~ ~I ; ~ I~ I ~ - ~~~. i _ ° ~~ t ,~-~~ " ' ~ I' I i i ~ "III u i ~ `~ - - 'I~I~i I.. G -- -;_= _ ----_ -- -.c- _-.---- -_ 1 s --- -- _ ---- _- - + _ ~ -- - _ -_ -_ - - - ~ - _ ~^ - ~ \~V ~u,.- _ ---- ---- -- .~- ~ ,~ ~- __ C~RO o~ROADS - _ _ - - _ _ \ __ ~~~ ,~ '~ ~a~ ~`~r',. .1 '~'. - - ~ L _ ~--~ t- ~ ~ r ~2~.' • ~ ,~ ' ~ i w ~~Illiiillll~ll ~ ~ ~ ~,. ~ ~~:\- _ '~ -ail' •.:~ ~~, ° ~~~ r~ _ ICI ~` ~ ~. ~ W ~~ ~ ~> ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~, - •r ~ I, g ~1\\- ~`~.~ > ~. -11~ I'I ~ ' ~~ 'lli ~~il~lll 1I - -_ ' ~,I - i III ~ j~~~ i. ~ ~~ ~~ - ~!~ III; ,~III~ II I I ~~'I~I ! ~!~~ ~ti !i I _I~ I~: i l'li ~ Ili ~~ i r w L ~ ~ ~: .~. „ .~, ^.~, { " ~ - e~ _ ~ \~~E~~.~ -___ _ - o ~_ ~ X11\ . Z - -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ / ~~U~ 7cL ( ,- ~~ ~ j --11~ ~~I~~~I.P~ ' ~1 0 ~OOV ~ ~\v l PS` ~ \ CONDO 6 LEVEL (+8249.84' DATUM) ' r`a~~~ ~k ,•-rbp BARNES COY Y v "~ lUNIT5 TMr5 LEVEL ARCHITECTS ~. ~ .Arcnic L5 0 LOCK-OFFS TMS LEVEL h.r. ), ti I ~Ui miaaCr-r tea, Zoos )~~ ~ ~~~~ . ~ ~~` _ _- I. _ L1 ---~ _ --il I III _ _ - I ~ 'I ~-__ - ~IIII i - - _ _ _- I~ ~ ,~, - - _-_- ~' ~- -- '`'~ ~ ~' ' ~ '~`~~ _ - 'IIII~' - __- _ '''-II III III' _ - ~~ ~~I~= + ~~, Ioe ~`~~:, ~ -moo ~ -- _ _ -' - -~o~__ - li I, ~~, --- r- -------------- - ~ ~- -- - - - ---~ ~,, _ - -- - T ,, ; - - - -- _ _ I - ~~ South Frontage Road PARTIAL ROOF PLAN OUTLINE . sme. ~ •isv rainueuerF wwasrswr ' nmm.slm,- mnson~ a.au4 vui Ned~vme~w ~Yb+c cerwnawbrly cpwq~~ne . bmn-TCLVU~ rrdN fd~OOn~ _ - wqy~ - wed~n Gram wlom' ~~,rd mwmoam bap .w~ mumnss aMtrW tYYe Ym ~ ~~AN eetl ~ .N CN 0.~emnm~bvESWp NeY~hY'T rn~ourlnpm (wn rhN.) mvu e4e Wmen 6eWW ~Ee/ Ir ~1~~ ^' d'r"dP°~` epee +Mdnlryt w. wwe Heae rNe~n °°"a . ~ ,,v loemneM soya muy 1 ~wuurc goes bee omn pr~mv~ Q°" '„ Qy. /r' : - l:«~.~nwtl ~ ~aevaaw uuxy ~ p .neym ~~~ \~~ ~~ I -. d ~y ~~y\ ~ / r ~ -~ ~ Qr - Leona ~~ \ ~' ` - Ili ~.~~ ~ ..1~~1. ,~~~ L\~ ®~ ^ yF~ til"'' ® ~ ~'' } ). .tl ~nr+u i 7r '\ } ,Il 1 ~' ~ ~:;~ S° ~ mil' ~ 91~~' ~,~~v~ 'i:., I .,I ~- _ ~.a. __~~~ f ^ T _ ~ i.. , ^ ~ ~ ~ I Dill-. 8 ~ ~~~. ~o. ~ ~~ ~ _ 1~~~^~ ~. _ ~ ! ~ __ I l~® ~ o~~i7 ~ ~ ~L -i ~ -- n~~ ~ '~.' ~ ~~c. I ~i i ~ II ,~, ~>~a - ~ ~~ tom.. m ~ ~~ I! ~I - _ ! - - - _ 'c'. i ~ r~I I.. i, Q - S + - - r .n !- i ; t~.1°mw.>c,,.~n ~ - ~~ ~: + ~ _ ~ ~,:~~ ~,y~! ~ ~ ~ ~~ e + ~ a ,~It . t ~ ~ :!mod ~~ a,: ~~~ ~ ~ n„I~ ~~ ~_ool: ~.al ~ -- ~ e~~>b _ T L. . ~, . - ~ ~ ~' ,~ I~+ c mm ~e rm ro+awm~ie ~ 'rzaawe. WTmnsiu~e- [mwiaro tmou^mot iuWy4W <IUMe GOia ~,me Wu Ertl {NU Du pr:e m~elwa, NEUm'miluq ~~ ~. - - ~•.,.e Strrtam~e- YpmYM mne iem/k.9 - wq~5e'tluve ~:~ var~ve,am oe~ - South Frontage Road NORTH ELEVATION CROSSROADS BARNES COY ~~ VA14 COLORADO ARCHITECTS .Arcmc t: -1 - - i . ( , i ~~ i ~~ ..\ i ..\ ~ ~~~ .\ r':.' j ~ Asa;,: - _ / / ~\ ,, ~,~ - ~ r •. . ~~` ~,~~. w~ ~.~~ ~- ~ ~ f~ ~ -- ~ ~~. ~~ - ~ ~o W ~- ~ ~ `. ','is s~~ lu ~ = ~ ~~~ : ''I ~~~i ~ r ~ n~ ~ ;1 I~'t ' fir` -~ ~ - - _ ~ .,. . ~.,. --..J I i it 1 ~. ~ ~ - I ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~• .~ ~h., _T ~i . , _ ,. , .,, ,: Wes;... ~ r~,~~ s~~.. e~~ ~~ •.."_. ~_~~ ~~ CROSSROADS ~"~ e~ ~'"n0N ~""~ "°""""""° BARNES COY ~ , vn~~, m~oaaoo ARCHITECTS ~ a2na ~ ~q~ ., .. ,...: .: :., ' ~_ - ~' I . i _ U _ J O \O J ` , i ~%. , J, ~~~ ~ /r ,. ,, / :~ - -- ' - ------- - - - ~- - - ~F ~ ~. _ y .... ~~~6. ~~~ "";~w~, CONDO-2 PARTIAL PLAN OUTLINE wmn.TM,eewxm ~~a~ soh.i.ico sour,. soF wn vn wm mmm.aamxan~wr mnn~ a w.~~emr cm~r.wwa. w we nnvosESrnnr ..~•,. m.~; m r, ~..~,. ~.,,~r /~ ®' ~ 1 ~,~~ ~' ~ ~® I _ ~~®~~;,,,: ~•~.', I ~ j ~~^~ -fil - ~ a~~. i ~ ~._., ..-ra rya .. S` ,~~+r~(~ R' f ~ _. ~._`;~ , ~ a~ ®S '~ I ~ ~ ~~ 'i®~~ .~_ ~ ~y ~I "_~ ~~ ~ f` io ~ r u _ _ ~1-~ ~ ~ i p~~~ ~~~1~~~ ~i:i \~i~l w~ I C~ :.._ : ~- ._ .. n_ - ~r = _ . :~ .... -: a ~ ~~ 1 ~ ® ®0 ° ~ ,r ~~.. ~.. - - ~r ~: .. -Ft. ;,~ , ,; i ~: ~ ~, .-- : =lea®~-- ri - ~,., la.. ~ L a ~ ~ ~' _. _ - M....... .. _.. _. '"~.° \ East Meadow Drive CROSSROADS BARNES COY `JAIL, CCLORACC SCUTM ELEVATION ~ a ~-~°° ARCHITECTS rA¢hi[ ~ _ i i i ~ i i - - ~ ~ ~^ - ~ ~ j i i i I aoo i _._.~ ~ L.._.. -.._.._.....~ . ~ - ~ ~ i . .\ ' _ ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ .~ .~ ~~ - .~ ~~~.~ w.~.~.w. ~,~ v.nmroe~ mwmawe~anq ~ T.I I it I ~ ~ I ~ I.~ ~ ~ ~,~~` \ nmo~.v w Iwmt ~I asu.• woen o-d euml mime. ~ 1.1 I I ' !! ~ I~ ~ I ~ f~ ~~ ~ \~ .,"e rT-~~ I..I '.: / i rv ~ - ~° 11 ~ ~ ~ . ,~ ~ ~~~ ~ ,moo ~ 1 ~ . D __ Reylm'I SV~twe ~~>~ I e ~ ?' -mod ' ~~ d o• R'~~~ - , _ _ ~~ty~ ¢ ' - !` ~~ ~° ®~' ` IY ~ ; , ~ i ~ I ~ ~ I' , ~ i °~.~ ~ ~ -~ ~' I .~, i iii ~..::~! o, l- a ~~ !ilia ~ • •. 'll Ali' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ !~YI~ ~~~ 1: ~~~` ,irl' I ~ _ ,~'~IS 1 i ~' ,~ .~ pyTU~ ~° ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ -~V 3~1 •`; ,, ~ 8 1 ~ S ~. , I. h r.~ ~u .~~ r, ,~ I; _ ~ ~~ _,~~ ~= ' ~~ `T , '' I ~.~ ! ~ ~! G~i- ~~! ~~, f I ; I - inwve oru _ _._ ~ 7 , , - _ ,, ~iMxmp wxro.., SIOINL J~ 1 0.W KfE5t CM 0 7~ t-1~ C.~ Smtl ~lr ` "~ ' •.Ir i9me. -•.:•.. ~-..-.. ~.. ... . W0 R WEST ELEVATION a Re1WUl`_.- •~~lupe'rmN4 ,~wi ~ . say. ~ ~ a CROSo ROADS BARNES .COY ~~ ~ ARCHITECTS A,~n~c~u CROSSROADS VAIL, COLORACC NEW NORTN ELEVATION VS. OLD NORTH ELEVATION „p BARNES COY ARCHITECTS 1. . Archit [s T r fr flTfll~ ~ II lin `. _ _ _ II ~~~ fill bull ~H.l~llh~ I :;,I. .~ . - ~i~i I~ ~ _ _ - ~ ~ ~ ~' ~' ~ I III I I' nh _ - - - - -..,~.-~ ,,, II I I , ,I I - ~ -- r illll _ = I'II~~C~~~~'l f,'ll' ~ -------_.~- _, .. ~ ... -~ , . - - - ~ .~._ - ~ -- _ L__ - ,~ ,~ ~~-~~~ - - - .,~,u-1-~- NEW WEST ELEVATION VS. OLD WEST ELEVATION CROSSROADS ~°" ' "° BARNES COY 1 vAlL,co]orsADO ARCHITECTS .arcnic cs ~ i i :~'_ _. ._.. 1 ~ . it I o 17 o _ ~ I .-.___II I .. I IL. . mo . o - I a\ I 'I I'I ._-._ II li' .-.. -- _. ~ -. ~ _ -Y 11 ..:II I _ _ I ~I. .I II --- / ~~I~ 11 ... ._._ I I '. I _ . .: .. ... _ _ -__ _. I.._ .._ ., - _ _ _ _ _ _ I I I rrr fff ~ I . I ~I - ~ .. _. ~..._ _ _ .. ..... . _ - _- . . _. .. a a _ .. B _ .:. ... e - . i i / , ~ _ ... \ v- _ n^ I .- _ I .. _... J L . _ ._ _ ._ - - _ - __ _ ... - .... - r . ~ _ 1 S I~.. , .:. , ,~ __ ,/ _ . _ _ _ e ~ _ _ _ _ 1 _ __ _ . _ . -- _ _ I - . -_ - _ ~ ___ _~___--; I - I _ ~ _.. .. ... .. ._ .. ~ _. .. _.~_ I _ _ _ __ _ ._ _ _~ __ I _ ~ - - __._ .. . .. .. _ ~ _ ._ _._ _ . . I . I ... _.. ... MI .,_ - .__ ___ ' _ - _ _ ____. __ _ .~.. o _. ~_ - e .-- `- - . _ I t _ I .,.- I - .. .. .I I . ~- i - r _ ~~- .. ....- 1... . __ - _ _ / _ I/ _ `JU/ I I yqr 1 ~ 1 ~ELI I -._ _. :_. _.._... ~•~ .. .J. / 0 / =_ ." - _. / I _ I. / r - - ;C. -- i- .. ~~~ k .. In- _ I - ~ '/ ~~- - ---' ~ 1- 1 - - - 0 /., ~. __.. ~ I J ._ 1 I. ~ ! (jJ ~I I II IL I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ - 271 ~V /, ~ I II II I a,t -- EAST MEADOW DRIVE G~ ~~~~ .. o ._. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ . _ ... .... ~N PLAZA ~ I - 11 -- -- __ _. -. _ - ii 1 -- .' ~ ~ - ---. .._ .. ~ _ _ 1 r~ _ ~' _ . - ._+ _ _ _ __ _- r I 1, V ~A_ _...._.. J _ -.. ._ . ~. 1 t_~ v/ ~.., . 4~ - .-._ _ .._._ . - 1 _-.. _ _. ... ... .... _ _ _ __ _ - -_ ~- - 5.- .... .._. __ I 7~ S ._ .. .. __ r __ - - - - - _ ... ~.. ~ ice„ ~'~` 9 -. -' _ _ _ _ _ - ___ _ i- ~ B : ~ B ~ .1 - _ _ _ _ ~ ~, ,. _ _ _ _ :. ~ - ,~ > \ .- ~ _ - - - - __ - _ - - ~~ ~ ~,~ -- - -- --r ~ , _ . rl _~ - ..._ _- ... 1 ~ ~ ~t ------ ,.~- - - e ~. . I _ _ N. X1.15 I 1 -_.:~ ._- 1 1 ~ 1 .- .1 ; ~ ~ Cj ~ t ~ _- - , ,.;~, ~e _ _ . , . '~. ,., :... .~:: 1 ~._" \ .f' f$. ~ /~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,!' ti,~ Ili ~' ~ xfi~ l' , t . ti f z ~, i, ,, ~ ~~ - fs s Z.I - -Y -ter sa s, r ~ 3%a . _ ~ ',, _, _ ~ c 11 ~ i 1 ~ ~~ '' \ ~ v JII/ ~' II ~ 4 - i r~ ~ ~~I~ i y., ~. 1 K ) i ~ CROSSROADS VAIL, COLORADO BUILDING DIAGRAM Extent of Building Beyond 20' Setback) BARNES COY scale : i' = Is=o•^- ARCHITECTS One story dock structure within 20' se[ back - ~~ Buildable area ou[ of setback M.a~H . =oo: j.~ •~,: ~ , ~ v i e .. i e=~ ,ABoe `\1'/+ _... - - -- - ----- _ _ :, _ , •. _ .~. :' .. :,, _. _... .. .. .. I //~ i .; ._ ~////~ia __ _____ ~t~.~, }-„mac ~~ _ f~~ I +I .. - .' _ ..I i 4. ........ I -i: 44.: __ I ~n i%. i ° __ /~ ,RV r~ It . It` ,r .. - _- /~ :•~/ Vii: _`' _ /\ ' .• ~ -'t Imo. ___.._ - - _~ ~~ .,. / /' ..... .-.~/, „~ - - l~~ / 'CSN `.CY~~ -~-7 >`,/ - ~. ~~ ,.: ~ r ~ ~~ t ;Sh: •, j 'T y ..CZC~•LZ .1~2;t .. ~ .. ~ _-~ ". _ ,r ,. / ., i:. . _. i •'': _ ~. ::;:.:: / ~. :; ~ ..:. "' - •'> - r/ :; ~ shy , , / %'i' ~;/ / / ~~ ~ ~3`~, III "c ',J 1\ .I _ _ I L J ... . +.,~ - = , / :.. MEP \ t v' - ~,'_I -_i i c'is~'~`•, ~ :i ii :iii ~ .- ~Pg'C . ~\~ ~„F%%. L _ _ ' 'CsR i i B - ~ -i i Z ~ ~ \, .. :: v,''~, ~ :, ~ b. . :'h .1 :1 .. .-I I -- - - '' ~~ :I i~ I I \\ \ ~ „,.. ~, . ,K ., t., ., ~.. ~ C • ,; .. ~ ,. ,.~~"~,?.,•,y,":~;c~^; ~ , .;z .~~^ /' III/~, $~ _ - -- .~;~ AGE . EAST MEADOW DRIVE _ _ __ ~~ ~"' G ~\ ~ .\\ ~ „~~ '\ %' • •: ~.. nYttig SWISS CHALET - ?~ PLAZA AREA CROSSROADS Scale : 1' = 16'-0" ~~,~, cotaRAOO AREA Of PUZA 29,130 sf BARNES COY C p AREA OF PROMENADE 6,386 SF ARCHITECTS • ~-A¢hit [s SIN - • _ - I i "r~ - it 6( r - - - - - . _.. _.._. _ .~ _.._.._.._.._ ._.._ _.._.. _..__ e ~ ~- - CROSSROADS ~ ~ VILLAGE INN PLAZA VAIL PLAZA HOTEL CROSSROADS VAIL, (~LORADO FRONTAGE ROAD ELEVATION COMPARISON Scale : N.T.S NOTE: konUge Road drops 16'-6' from Gossroads front door to Gateway front door. GATEWAY ROUNDABOUTI ~~ BARNES COY ~. , ARCHITECTS =_~ rArchit [s :--~~~ ; I 1 r r ; ~~ ~~ c 1 \ J ILgG N FLgZy ~~ ~J .\y; I---~,I ~ ~ 1-; , ~ °~:I- ir`~ .r ''• i_ I ~~ ; =~~. ' ~ / \ ~~` . ~ ) ~ ~~ CROSSROADS JAIL, COLOR:.!`A • ~ ~ •~\ ~I1~ EAST MEADOW DRIVE ' Wit-., 2i•.' ~ .f` ' .-~ - x, •,u.,-r~ ----- i~ -~ ' ~ ~cT~---'-- - - _~ OUTH FRO ~-...,~ -_ .~ -_ _ t ,ft r r t ~ _ _ ~ ` ~ + 'I - s ,y{ ~-r-~-~~ I ~-,_~ ~ I ~ 'w'' ..SxY't,~y:1%~~ ^-I-iT~ •r„^ 'q t L ~~ ".,, - __ I ~ _ r3 I y r ` f 4k ~ ~~~ T ~ t "-{-rl_~' ,f ( t~ '!~h'l1 \ Y~f lyT'~ } 3~ '9 2•t q..~ ', :'ll 6 ~\ _"• ~..,c S "'r-~-. , I~ -L ~-\ _~ ~_ J ~~vv4j~UL.t-S tt ~ti ~'Y- -+."~iY~k~ ~c'_~~ ~5^*~,. f .->` r a: ~,, _ Y Syr ~ ~ ~ r ~ \~~ ~ ~ ... .- .. ~ ._. .. -. ... $ - t~i~t~~. ~"*-i. hi.+~•\. `=~~~~ ~i,,.;.~r s ~ ~~ _ .. 7 ~ 1.,.. y _ _ - J I ~ ~~ U.~ I--l. I'.' ~ et:: I t ~ ~\'~~ ~~ 7~'<oi ~, ~'°~,m.~•.-"'°~.,. ~/ ~ r-,-n\ iv C . L ~ ~ ~ i r ~Y 51~ rl ~ t mot. rk ~'~r ~~1~ b'~'~~ ri ~~ '~/~-k \~~ U _ I £ I ~..,~~1,,,.A ~`1.L"',~^ t_~*i-i- /` K,"w ~ Il `, ! "'N:l ff^~~'rl•.~ liti'" \ _ \ti~ ry~-~ I 4... ys Imo- ~) `~11 ~•` ~-` ''s,a -~'.~ li /~ ! ~ ~ ~.~ ci t L'~ ~. ~*' ~ ~ - (~~ a _~ 11 ~- s S I ~ iq eat r~ ~~ J ~~ Y :~ r. ~ ~ d' \~~ ~- ~ < I t ' 1bl ~> 4~~•~ ~ ~~~' ~ ~L'_ - -_~ ~ 3 ~pRIVE ~ >f ;~-t I..; „/~' -~-~"-__ _ / ,. .... .. ~~.~` , r1~. ~:_ ~ C_! 4~rJ.- _ .." ~5~~~,;.sr{`?C~~~i~l~ _- !_'__ -_. (Q~ ~ Vic,.:. _ V/ ~! BUILDING HEIGHT PLAN (historic rade BARNES COY ®~ - ~~ ARCHITECTS I .ARnic c: ~.7 1 ~ - ' ~ _ ~-.~ i -- mss. `h ~;'~~ 1 -~ _-_'„'.` c.`~,~_^ -_ -- -_ \ _- _. _ - -- - SOU7H ~N G `~ ~,•~, - ~ ~-~ - _ - ~` _ r' I `°r Il I!°. . i -~, '~. ~,.."'e,~..~w.~ ?'" ~_.- - -- _~ E R AD ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~---~- ~4 1 I ~ i \ ~ +1 ` ~ 1~ I ~ I I ~ i . `~ ~ _ ~ ~ -. ~ t y+_ ~'`' ~, .a'^Ji,'~t~~~. ;,~•;,. - - - ----0 _ - ~ ; __ ~f ~~~ f \ \ ~ -I VIILgGE INNP ~j .1~ i ~' - ~ _ ~ ~ ~~`~'' .F~ f'- ~~= L u - '-' - '_ ' ~ 1 ( 1- ! ~ ' - ( F I ~"a - v .- J~ `iii ,'ir - ~ ~ 1 -:±?£ ~ _4. E'tir Sv t, s ~J.y. < ., I) ..1 '-r.~_~ -~_._~ ~\-- ~t ;;fig -. ~ I ~.I ~r~ [\ ru.. - ~~ ~." -v ty4, j ~ -- dixrL°r'\ -~'*"'~. aJ~~~ 'Kf .k=i. }} St i. ;.' ~~~~•+~~` ~._ 1 ; S.~)(-_ __ I ..r ~ ;.! ~ I II ~ 17 .~ -. )~ ~ -~5:: q~'~. - it ~ t ~z~~~. -~ ~, ~ _r ~~ t r, V. I I`. 1 I 1 ~i= ~' IF-~i _- ~ _ - i _ ~ Fib ~ < ~ ! - „a ~ - k - . I I _ t t - r ~ ~ Z.~ 1 ~ ~ e \ .1 LJ II~ ~~~ ~~~-_ _: ' ~ - _ I _yl-.-_. t- ~: fl ~__ _~: . ~~ -J 1 1~ ,~~\,, r ~ ~ ~?< 2 r .... y{" ~ " ~E 11 - ~ 1 2~` d' v~. ~ irh- L, _ - ~ .~ - 1 + ~: I c-~~~ ~_.~ li 1 \, _ r p ..'."~~ ~~ A L ' I ~ -~- .. - e~. { ~.- L%` 515 _ /. I\~{{`\ ~`\ j~ J~ -\ ' ((~ .r . Ir! t /^~I\~ ~~-n~ ~`~`~t I° ~'.(.I~. _ _ ~ F : \ ~ r `jr .' I ,mot J ~ V~\ I, '\ (cc ~~ ~te:I I.T t~. 1'~\,1\\ }I' \ ;~,~ ~ ~•,i~"'•~.e~~,`*.R ~., '~'i . f "~-. +~.v~. - I '_~ J I.YC.l ~ r/ ~) r.. 4 .% •' - lVJ =1 1 ~ \' /-~ . L J ry~~ . ~ ^~"{~ ~ 1 ~ r - '\ 1 ~-_ r ~- ~ ^w. _ ` - R- < .. r ~ "h`.. Ld I , .\\ 1/f ~~ ~. ! ~tj i "':.~~" \<~S"• ~ -~ _r~ +' 1. f.c..,/`~~t %;r"~ i 1~_.c- - 1. I _ ti' ) I _~=1, -'^:1 'l-a-~-~: r~d~,../~~+ 1 !-~ .;:~..- i ~ \ .t\a1 %1- ~'-" ~~ ~ •'i1'• \i_ ` r -''~ r r ~ ~7 \ ' ~- l-.." J r;,L~a,:' ~ I S{ I: 1 ~~ ~, ~ )? /` \ '.r"' '~:~, %I ~`-~- ^~~•/ 'vri!(.• rF7c r..: _ + '~- is ~ ''~ :~:~;~, ;v'~:Q.~ I IS~~i". t ~7i 7 r~ 1~ 1~ •'~.<;,' 1 _}%'_. \4,' 1 ~Y~"i6 ~'~\ „k \'. ~` i- 1 - _a .t7. (~~ ; ' \. `i ~ ~.~~o'~`., -,IC: l\Iw.`l 'r. n _ T;\. Y~_ t,,"."r`~ ~°~i."~i~ vt_p: i\i. 'i°I: y -._'\.-?-!,-1y r" s :y .ti,,..,. i .,, ;l'• ;a i J p '-i' ~ r! ~. ~ . ,.o -~ . ~ :! .•'~." '. I~ ,,.C~_ ~ Y-:+. ~ / d ~ ''~:_ "1 ~ P~ ~ ! \{ ~ l~l <` 'r}~:4 , ~-Y Vii: r /' Ir ~.~.~ . ~ ~~'' \' ~ ~'` •!A\ \~•. ' i F~ - i ) --.~ i- ~ _^ -1 ~ p ;.-' ~. ~ / ~`~<;,;'~ ~.. I .~~C ~, r if '°^~~, / II ^~` Irl \ ~~~• ~ ~'~- ;;-r5. ~~.\\\'~ ^v \.•i I !~ y~` -~ - .~ ~-._. 1 ,',7` \ J\~; F "~ - 4. c1~.r~r •> ;.G;~+, I ~, .f~~~. ti. ..~\~ ~~:-=~; , „\., .\ \ . \ ~.. ;[4j y, ~ 1 ~.~ ! ra- .J- 1~ r- JL •;rS ~f-' I .' 3 . ~ .. ''4. ~ " .~= ': ~`y ~ n,,~~ ~"c 1 aal `01 ~.. ~i I _~__;1 \ ~:'1a-~\ ~ "~ 11. -~ . 1 ~~- ~.. >, a,i:. ,~\ ~ ., - .\ ~- L <cc. L ~c II ~~I -F.`Uptcg. {,S E'„'y '~~' I ~ ,t,JI '\.:\` \~ ~~\ ~_~ x-11 1'\ a.-- :~} L<_ ~ L.I%~~'-`r ! :?art f t. `*:51 i' _ ~: "C ~\ ~\, ( ,^J~J, ~t. Lr ,, `•~l L •"T`. J, I'~J~~7 ,!'FJ'?L VI ~'t ~ ;1 1"- .~~~ \ _~L+~i' r\\~ ~, /-. - - - .h_ I ry. ., ^ `a _•,C :, ~~~~.\ /., "1 l i ;~~ -il ~~?\, '.. ~ ___ ~- 1. •:.kt ~a_. .4: l •t. L'7 - .j i~ o .:L c ch..p,- c„a .; \~ ~ __ I I i' '~~r~ - ~'1: - r .~-6v ~ ; s`s;-, ~ t: ''``~ .tt. ISe; Y. ~~C~i of ~ 1\ /-~ ~~, ~~'•. \ '\ .~~ ,t- - - ~'~.~.: ~z4Sr ,. .. .~.:; F :\ (( C / _ E - ~q a - .. -.r..., , _ j ;. " I ~.~ _ _ \ r - f "'I - \ > >^ ~ ~~ ..^L« \ - 'i\ - - . L• I \ cc ,~y - - 1 ~a~ .,\ C C`C C•.'<•4 1r I ~r,~ :\ - -.S ~Y /'mil 1 ' ~l ~ ~i f •i, f '~ ~''C .GC., •C. Cat'. .p4' i .1. '4. / i'%' ~ 1 •l``l~", •r •: -. .: L '^I ^.C , .1 • ~~ -lam - 1. 4. '! •.P ,~ - ~ '\ .. t ~ L: -.:Y _ ~ ~ ~1 ~l ;: J J:.; , , +l.; ':. -+~ _ ate,- \ . ~ ` ~• ` '. i ~.., s :: C.~ ~ - - - - . !-__ ~ ~! l r^ ". ti -i: .,.. .. ~>~, <, ., o 1~' - .l >. I r1-• - `it' p - - +'~ '` .. :~.~ -,a. --.- e . _ ' L:~'s' -~' "~~, __ • ' < < ~' `F f s -~~ ~ s.; 1, 1 ! ~;^ I~ \ ~ Ir- I c' tj ,may ~~~ _ _ ' ~ - _- ,~. i-y-=c1 7 } ~ + ,i~'; •~, 1 _ \ ~1 _' i~ ~~ !~ - l' : R1 J~ Jlr Il-' ~ I l _ ±'-`';°~:, ==.-__ c. >.c,_-~. E T alec _~ `~' \ ;,1\\ I~.'T ` ~J' ~"MEP ~O i~t~ '::~~ 1...~ _ e;.6-".. .~s~~ - ! ~, MEAD e ~,, .,.~~, . ~° ''L s ~ A> 1, ~ OW DRIVE a -1 f \~ ~ ~~ ;~ ~ '~ i ,..p~~" - ~ SS ` . f'~ ~E ~ ~ f ,F~; j ~, ' - ~~ ..,. .. .. vrr':YS€i I..~P..; F.~cY_ ... ,~=_~.-- ~ ;~::\.`F~,.,.:."f`~.:z?,4J. -,-~.-\<- ~ ~ ~" ~ \ :_ - .'Y...,,.-1-`s~,ct,ill~yl{~.'''1'r,- - _. _._ _ -- -- ~j I., "~F.~,•;<. _~ V ~` CROSSROADS BDRDING HEIGHT PLAN (ac[ual grade) _ BARNES COY VA1L, COLORADO ~ s..~. ; :va ~ a ~ ` ARCHITECTS .,,F ~ -; 1 rA2n{{ c: MAa~., tea. z~o~ _ - s. ,r r. 4,`.j~~({~ ~ ~`I~ S '- 1.: Y I~ 0 EC {~,' $,'-~,. ~ f f 1 I' F 0 tsr+ 4 ~*~'Si~ ~ ~ `Y ~ _ 1 I I gyp}.. 1 1 I - ,~ I 1 ~~~ I Fti p • , • f~ '~ o ~ ~~~ I ~~ o , , ~O R , v 1I wu F- 9 h _. ~,~ ~~, I nV .- Cad Y - (( -Y/` , i ~1~""~~ j - ~ 3 `;per r ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ _~ arr.:~ :~ ~.r~,. „ ~o~ '~ - - -'/~ i ' m o:a x~ r6 ,, L''~ t ~ i ~ e I ~ ~ IIy.. Ilf i -_ pn •.:V } t~~, it iC F i~ ~ ~- 0,5T i:. _ _ v .. ~~ A - .. .+9 .. -. inl '~k S-J'" i _ _ --- - ~t o ~ - , -- I,~ 1 1 ~ - _- [ h 1 ..I..::,y II~ / , ~ ~. yam, ~.I ; ~ / i ~ I / ~ I! e I r 1 1 I I o ; ~;; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ icy, e ~ ~ _ ~~ - ~ 'r ; ~'' r ~ ~~~`~~ ~i ~ f~ + ~' t d ~ v';, CROSSROADS` ~ ~ _ E ;,~~ ^~` ~ ~~~y $ ~Y ® --,~., u ~ ~~ /'Y_ ~ ,~ ~,, g vAIL, wLORAOO ~ ~ ~ - }• ~ ~ ~ .~b'\ ~7 _ _ X ~ 1 ~~ ® BARNES COY .( wvn ur.r~.. s. so,,,, ~.,,,o„ „ SUN STUDY SUMMER AND WINTER SOLSTICE PLAN ~,~, ~u....e» ,,,. ARCHITECTS ~' - 1 . Archi[GC[s i ,~ ( \ ~ _ ( . C~ossrn~ b~u~l~,~~~ Scf~ .... ~-_ __~_ _ ~ ~ ;~ l i ~ l -.~~~"~-a -3~ -~..-,-.'_~ - e'er - .\ _ _ - __ --_ = __ _ _'^ -..~-.-v=.+-"` - __-~--~_,~_e~ ;T' •^ ~"f°~' as - 5~`~ ~i \ \ ~'~ .3 ~~~\\1 \ \ Vi ~-~ ~~ ,.~-^ ~ ~ &fl~..~ - ~~''It;~ _~ ~ . Fooo, ~ ~~.~ - j _ __ ~ 5~: I ; r ~Ir~ _f([ „_- ~,~~-, __ •~=~-.---1~~~~~• `~ is ~ ,'~~~'.a ~=a~i~.i~.~ '~ ~ III ~=-~ J_ \\ `~ -e~~ r - -~ ~ ~ ~~ \.. ~\.. •\ \ ~ ~~:. -~.! - 384. ,~` ` I Cm:-- .; \ '~ -.Y.~tt ~ Z~~~. .,` ` ~ _~-"~~` ~/ l` ~ 4~~ '~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ""'° "''~.~~`"~_,.--- f / , ~'\\~ : ` \ ° ~ rte' ~ `` .. ,\ ~ ~ _ `- V ~ ar ~r i ! ~ , 2.~ :'\3 `1~ ~ `\~1 1\. ~~ ~ / it /.a.l (~" ''f `-,2A - ~ \~\~\\ ~ \\` \ ~ ~ -\i ~ r ~- ,_ J~ ~ ~ 2 \` ~ _~~ ~\ %/ \J")f~ ~, ~~ C' ~~r r+ ~ ~ i - j f ~j~ ~1\~j \ -~1-~---i'r~r~n~n \ \l~ ~~ \~~ ~. ~~F~- sr~ u- ~ ~~"~.l'm . ~ \ ` \\C~.! -~ I Y 'i. L'l ~ 4 r t'Iri,~ ~ -~ ~ ~~t r ~C. l~_~~T C 1- ..~ -\~ ~\\ \ \~~ 4\ .,-F~\ v~:~• e ~~ \ ^Y `~~ l~~:t - .-~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ; I" 7 ~ ~ ~ >rr' fem. c ~, i .~ ' q-a ~ : - ~~~'+•~ ~ /F , r, ~ y ~• q (~ .~ ~ =~~.. a%C.._ \ \ ~.~ .- ill ~-`. ~ 1 \ ~~'+~ t n i~ ~ t\ 1~ : ~ ~ ` \ ~\~ i\`.~ '('Fy --qtr-~~r-~ -~~- _ _.,m`~ >~~11 > t~ \ i q -.. ,r'.r"f~ , ; 1 ___~ . - ., ~ - --- h ~,j.~ ~-. ~~ _~ ~ •'T '-._• .,~ I~ ~ r~ •~ t~ ... ~ .1: -ti sir,=~i ~~ ~~.`~, f ~,_. 3.4 rnA:tIMU.1 RANGE OF 6ULD.TG MEGHT IN 6TDWE6 A nAV~ing dory is tlslvutl as 9 real of nei4hl _ ~ Ino tool irwWtltal. Enact nalghl reslriclians }. v: ill be tlelermNetl by iJrurg, VdrieO tool reYJhrs ~5? ~Milnin rxry~e specdietl .s tlesNetl la ach builtlinp - }~ DENOTC'6 EY.ISTIIJ"U DR APWiDVED BULOINGS WHICH `• DO NOT C0IFORM TO THE CONCEPTUAL 6UtLDnuG HEIGHT PLAN SHAOIrG DENOTES iRET6 OF Se.VLAR HEIGHT ,. ~=-.-_- _ -_-~ -~_-- _~ . 21:3:-:::.. _ _ = ~_-- __ _ .. ._ . .~ z._.: ~: ~_ .. ` ~ - _ - _ _ - ?:::a:_::a ~::~. -ate;'` -.~='~-~:_y~ -.~ ^:_-----~ ~ _._~-.. ~ ar ~+`c i //~,~~~i /,~' -- ___ ~ ~ ~ ..._~ CEPTUAL LEGEND I%_==~ --_ _ -~'~:~~.j; ~\\\~~~~.;;r~~S',:~~ o ~ ~s~. ~~; I"7~ ~LAIy ~. N n ,-r 0 --_ y -- ~-~ ~~. = ~ ~ ,r ~- , ..~ -`r` ~- - - C~oS~cwc~~ ~ve~~ ~ ifs. ' =-- - '` `~ `z ti 1 `-~-D-~= ~A _- __.~~ ---__. ~~-c'-''-4`~_ Vii" _.>~ 1 )~ ~~~-. ~~ :.~~. - ~"-~'- ~.,. - r U ~-c ~_ *I-'e~~ ~ ~v~r _ A 1 t _ ° "y /' ~~':I :~i.~-s- . L'cli 19U -_ ~~" % ~~ ~_ ~~~ -\ /._ - ~ _ ~.itil~i~~i~ rnizED u5E ^~ rAED1U1nfMGn oErusrtv RESIUENRAL 1 ~ J t0~'.' DENSITY FESIDENTIAL ' ~" `- ~ \=t -~.,,_.r~_, -_ _=_°~.• - -- PUBLIC FAGI-RY fPnRKING SKI BASE /RECREATION .. r~ i ~.K ~1t1~1 J ;1 ~Y1L ,I'I FOPO ~- _ _- ~1` y ~~; ~ ~~'~ ii I 1 PMT ~ ~_ I ~ /' ~i~tl~i'.~,~---', mss- r ~~. ~,'~ ~ ., i , ~ , i ~ ~~,_ ~,~~ `fir _~l' j ~/, ; ~~ ~ ~S ~ r i I~tl' , ~ ! ~ by , ~ 4 ~ _ -~rsi ~ f `(/ ~~ ~G fry ~1,.~,~ 1 _ ~'' _ -~ -= __ irk `,~~ ~ - _ J_ - ~ °/ Y f ~ - / / _ J - I/ ~_ ~ -_ _ ~ Y - ~~ ` ~~~ ~ ., ~~~ / ~~. ~~-_ - ~ ~' ~ LAPaID USE P' AN ~ - - ,I ~-' I ~~ .~ # ~'- i"'~ ~~ ~ V.4tL VILI.4GE ?L4N _. /. ` Crossroads Employee Housing Plan The employee housing requirement for the Crossroads Redevelopment project is proposed to be accommodated in one or both of the following methods: Payment in lieu of providing housing to the Housing Authority or Town of Vail; or • Deed restricting, existing housing units dispersed throughout the Town to meet the required number of beds. We understand that the Town and the Housing Authority maybe considering the establishment of a fee in-lieu exercised on a case-by-case basis. Depending on the fee which is established, the owner of Crossroads would prefer to make this payment in order to fund future housing endeavors throughout the Town. If the payment in-lieu system is either not established or the fee is otherwise not acceptable to the owner of Crossroads, the owner will purchase and deed restrict existing housing as has been permitted for numerous other development projects over the last 20 years. Attachment: E Condominium Rental Program Crossroads Intent: The condominium rental program is being developed by input and direction from Stan Cope who has more than 30 years of experience with successful rental programs. The rental program is focused on three main goals, which have proven successful for Stan at the Lodge Tower, as well as numerous other high quality, tourist oriented properties: 1. Owner asset management; 2. Owner rental income; and 3. Owner's personal usage and satisfaction. When these three goals can be achieved, condo owners in a large condominium projects will rent units voluntarily. Currently, 75% of the units in the Lodge Tower rent and the renting owners yield 63% of the gross rental revenue. In summary, the key to achieving the above goals is to emulate the management of a fine, high quality, luxury hotel. The management program is a hospitality program above all else. On-site management and management offices are a necessity. Top level services need to be provided to renting guests and owners alike. Great service and a first class property will attract the kind of clientele that not only can afford a fine resort but will respect the property of others. Owners become proud of being part of the resort and have confidence that their asset is being well cared for while producing a painless, welcome income to off-set their ownership expenses. The level of service to be offered includes daily or twice daily maid service, 24-hour desk and concierge, bell and valet staff, local transportation service, pre-arrival activity, ski and grocery service and premium rental equipment. An in-house maintenance staff not only quickly provides for guests needs but corrects problems in units before they become a major problem and expense to the renting owner. Owners become confident that their arrival will be hassle free and as enjoyable as a vacationing guest in spite of a renting guest occupying their unit the night before. The final piece to encourage owners to rent is creating a financial structure that strongly rewards owners that rent. The cost sharing structure between the Homeowners' Association and the Rental Program needs to be an integrated program that equitably balances all of the services being offered to owners and renters alike. Properly and efficiently designed, owners will be financially rewarded for renting instead of carrying the service costs for all owners, as is the case in many condominium .hospitality programs. Strategies for successful asset and rental management 1. Client asset management. Attachment: F Condo owners are reluctant to rent their homes if they perceive that their asset is at risk from damage, theft, or other property degradation. When there is proper staffing to allow for daily inspections of property and proper assurance of damage replacement, condo owners feel more comfortable renting their homes. Crossroads will employ an adequate staff to insure proper property supervision and inspection to the highest level of quality. Daily maid service is made available to owners and automatically provided for guests in order to provide convenient service to the guests as well as a supervision mechanism for the management of the property. If the property is managed at the highest level of quality then owners feel comfortable allowing their asset to be utilized. Crossroads plans to manage the property at the highest level of quality with 24- hour on-site management, security, and client services. 2. Client rental income. Condominium management can be an expensive non-deductible expense for condo owners. The Crossroads rental program will be structured similar to that of the Lodge Tower where the overall condominium ownership expense can easily be offset by the income generated by the rental program. Additionally, condominium owners can expect net rental income reaching 63% of the total revenues from renting one's condominium. 3. Personal usage and satisfaction. Probably the most important aspect of a rental program is flexibility. Some owners will purchase a condominium in Vail for personal use as a higher priority to rental income. Having ones home available when one wants to use it is extremely important to the success of a rental program. An owner does not want to feel trapped by committing to certain days or weeks. To create flexibility owners are asked to set aside dates they think they may be in Vail and dates they know they will not. Owners are able to check back frequently with changes to schedules. Additionally, management staff stays in close contact with owners when bookings are being made to make sure the owners usage is not being infringed upon. Based on Stan's experience working at the Lodge Tower, we believe that at least 50 of the 76 proposed condominiums will be successfully rented. This exceeds the predictions utilized in the revenue analysis prepared by Steve Thompson who assumed only 30% of the units would be rented. Amore detailed management program will be developed in the coming months. • 24 Hour front desk and concierge • High level of service to unit owners • Fee structure allowing those participating in rental program to offset management and maintenance fees and obtain rental income • Daily maid service available • Full-time management/rental staff located on-site • Food service delivery available from on-site restaurants • Fulltime on-site security • Active marketing program for rental units locally and nationally • Participation in national condo rental/exchange club MEMO To: Warren Campbell, Senior Planner From: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer Re: Crossroads Redevelopment-Public Works Comments Date: 4-22-OS After a review of the resubmittal of the Crossroad redevelopment plans, the Public Works Departments finds the following issues that will need to be addressed prior to final approval. It is noted that the grading and civil drawings have not been fully updated to match this newest submittal. These will require additional review and comment. The following outlines comments that will need to be conditions of approval of PEC. Public Works conditions of approval: 1. Final Civil Engineering drawings and Final Drainage Report must be approved prior to Building permit submittal and meet all Town codes and standards. An additional review and comment period will be required for this submittal. 2. The access off the S. Frontage Rd. is key to this development. A C-DOT access permit shall be submitted and approved prior to Building permit submittal and shall be a condition of PEC approval. If changes to the PEC approved plans are required by C-DOT to facilitate an Access Permit the applicant will be required to return for an amendment to the PEC approved plans. 3. The Porte-cochere circulation shall be approved by C-DOT as part of the C-DOT access permit. 4. Village Center Road shall be graded with a normal crown. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for the complete design acid construction of the roadway improvements as shown on the Crossroads Public Improvements plan dated 3/28/05 and also the complete design of the remainder of Willow Bridge Rd. going south to the International Bridge, excluding but matching those improvements being designed and constructed by One Willow Place Road. 6. All private improvements within the public ROW, including any temporary shoring that is to remain in place, will require a Revocable ROW permit. 7. .All shoring walls shall remain within the private property limits. 8. The proposed drainage system along the S. Frontage Rd. shall be coordinated with Vail Plaza Hotel and tied into the Vail Plaza hotel proposed storm sewer system. 9. Limits of Streetscape improvements to be discussed and approved prior to DRB approval. 10. Show all grades and drainage for parking structure. Provide asand/oil separator. 11. Is the loading and delivery access shall be right-in right-out. Right-in and right- . out operations may facilitate receiving an approval from C-DOT. However this may also require a roundabout at the Village Center Rd./S. Frontage Rd. Attachment: G intersection to accommodate vehicles needing to return to I-70 at Main Vail. This will require further investigation with C-DOT. 12. The Traffic impact fee of $5000 per additional pm peak trip generation shall be assessed and put forward directly to mitigate traffic impacts. These fees may not be deferred to indirect public improvements (i.e. streetscape, landscape) that are otherwise required for approval. 13. All necessary easements, agreements, bonds, and permits must be in place prior to building permit submittal. (i.e. construction easements on adjacent properties, utility easements, pedestrian easements, drainage easements, access easements, revocable ROW permit, ROW permit, etc...) 14. An excavation shoring plan shall be required to be approved prior to Building permit submittal. 15. The developer shall be responsible to construct all necessary storm water improvements in order to convey all contributing on-site and adjacent off-site drainage to gore creek. 16. The open plaza should be dedicated, similar to -the Lionshead Corc; Site Pedestrian Plaza as a public access easement. 17. The developer shall incorporate Art in Public Places. 18. The loading and delivery facility should be made available to provide capacity to other sites. This will require easy access from the delivery facility, down a service elevator, then direct access to the plaza level. 19. A stormwater discharge permit and erosion control plan will be required prior to building permit approval. 20. An approved staging plan, phasing plan, and construction schedule shall be required prior to Building Permit approval. Mauriello Planning Group April 12, 2005 Warren Campbell, AICP Senior Planner Town of Vall 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 8 1620 Re: Crossroads Redevelopment -Retail Area Study Dear Warren: This letter shall serve as an update to the commercial area analysis provided to you previously on the Crossroads project (see attached analysis). I hope you will find this useful in your analysis of the project. The analysis shows that the current Crossroads contains approximately 13.8% of the all of the commercial space in the Vail Village area (40,53 I sq. ft. of a total of 293,343 sq. ft.). Upon completion of the redevelopment of Crossroads ~t will represent 19.6% of the total commercial floor area in the Vail Village (6 I ,596 sq. ft. of a total of 3 14,408 sq. ft.). This figure represents a significant increase in the available commeroal area within the Vail Village. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ~~~ Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP Principal PO Box 1127^Avon, CO 81620.Office: 970-748-0920^Fax: 970-748-0377^Cell: 970-376-3318^mauriello@comcast.net Attachment: H _._. _._ Summary of Vai! Village :Retail Analysis .. ............................... Com lex Retail SF A&.D Touter 4,630 Bell Tower 6,950 Casino Building _ 3,749 Christiania 1,000 Cavered Bridge _ $,8113 ~ Creekside _ 9,136 Crossroad's West 40,531 - C tun's 5,434 Fitz. Scott Buildin 900 Galler Buildin r __ 5,247 Gastaf (:'crams 14,011 Golden Peak Douse 6,581. Gore Creek Plaza 7,14b 1-1.111.13ui.ldin 8,056 ~- Lod re at Vail 7,982 , Manor Vail 4,200 Mc$ride .Buildin 22,640 Mi11 Creek C:'i~urt 3.5.53 One Vail :Place ~ 2,b91 P.ldr~ Lode :14,000 Red Lian Buildin t3,b43 - Rucl: ack . 4,52 8 S.itzmark _ 11,929 Slifer Building b3$ Sonnenal . 9,506 Vait Village Lnn 44,3f.,1, Village Center 14,127 Wall Street 7,371 Total 293r3~13 Shopping and Dining are the 2nd most attractive features of Vail for visitors The .Bavarian acid Tyrolean architectural styles of buildings along with the "public-space" environment created by public art and monuments positively impacts the shipping experience for visitors. • Range of retail sales in Vail Village - $16SIsf to $1,450/sf; Average retail sales in Vail Village - $224lsf. • Range of retail space in Vail Village - 250sf to $,OS7s1; Average reta.i 1 space - 1,858sf. • Art Galleries - Auerat;e Sales of $400sf . • Gift Stores -Stiles Range a1~~25Usf to ~400sf • Jewelry 5to.re -Average Sales of $IOOOsf • Spurts .Retail -Average Sales a.f $230sf • Apparel .Retail -Sales Rarige a1' $800 to $1,004sf • Most Leases are Five-Y'ear .l.,cases with only a Handful of Stares Reporting T'en-Year Leases. • .Retailers report that the biggest. threat to Vail is a "sta:lca" retail environment. Retail & Restaurant Space by Use Type SF % of 'Total Retail - !~ood 11,350 ' 4.b% Retail. - A arel 32,6$2 13.4% Retail.... S ort 60,135 24.6%~ Retail - 3ewe1 $,951 _ 3.6%~ Retail - Caller 24,032 9.8% .Retail -Other 1.$,1.96 __ 7.4°l° Food & Bevera es 64,032 26.2% ' Alightclubs $,563 _ 3.S% ~~ --.4.;_ _ ~~ ~ouaFV~ THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town Code, on March 14, 2005, at 2:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for final review of a final plat for a major subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-3, Major Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for the creation of the Vail Mountain Park Subdivision; a final review of a variance from Section 12-8A-5, Lot Area and Site Dimensions, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the creation of a new lot less than 35 acres in size, located at Tract. E, Vail Village, Fifth Filing and a part of Lot C, Block 5-C, Vail Village First Filing, and setting for details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: George Ruther A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7G-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for an accessory use (soil and ground water remediation system), located at 2313 North Frontage Road/Tract B, Vail das Schone Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: West Vail Shell Planner: Bill Gibson A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a public utility and public service use, located at 2734 Snowberry Drive/Lot 14, Block 9, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: ` Elisabeth Eckel A request for a final review of a text amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow for an amendment to Section 12-21-14, Restrictions in Specific Zones on Excessive Slopes, Vail Town Code, to increase the amount of allowable site coverage on lots with excessive slopes from 15% to 20%; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Helmut Reiss, represented by Isom & Associates Planner: Matt Gennett A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposal to establish Special Development District No. 39, pursuant to Article 12-9(A), Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of Crossroads, a mixed use development; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-2=2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, to add a definition for bowling alley; a request for a text amendment to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, Attachment: I Mauriello Planning Group Adjacent Property Owner List Crossroads Redevelopment February 2005 TOWN OF VAIL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 CROSSROADS OF VAIL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 143 EAST MEADOW DR STE 360 VAIL, CO 81657 VILLAGE INN PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION COLORADO REGISTRATION INC. PO BOX 666 VAIL, CO 81658 VILLAGE INN PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION C/O ANN BISHOP PO BOX 820 VAIL, CO 81658 VILLAGE INN PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 100 EAST MEADOW DRIVE, #34 VAIL, CO 81657 SONNENALP PROPERTIES INC 20 VAIL RD VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL DOVER ASSOCIATES LLC 4148 N ARCADIA DR PHOENIX, AZ 85018 VILLAGE CENTER ASSOC 124 WILLOW BRIDGE RD VAIL, CO 81657 AUSTRIA HAUS CONDO ASSOC INC 20 VAIL RD VAIL, CO 81657 COLORADO DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 4201 E ARKANSAS AVE DENVER, CO 80222 MAURIELLO PLANNING GROUP, LLC PO BOX 1127 AVON, CO 81620 Crossroads Redevelopment CSC Text Amendment Additional Property Owners List (Gateway Building/Weststar Bank Building) SUGAR NOTCH LP C/O RUSSELL STANDARD CORP PO BOX 479 BRIDGEVILLE PA 15017 WHITE RIVER ACQUISITION CORP C/O MANUEL MARTINEZ WW CNSLTNG GRP 905 BRICKELL BAY DR SUITE 230 MIAMI FL 33131 LIPCON, CHARLES R. & IRMGARD -JT 430 N MASHTA DR KEY BISCAYNE FL 33149 SEBOLD, DAVID L. & CYNTHIA L. -JT 80 W 78TH ST CHANHASSEN MN 55317 575M LLC 18 SUMMERFIELD LN SARATOGA SPRINGS NY 12866 GGG LLC PO BOX 5963 VAIL CO 81658 PALMOS, LEO 2775 IRIS AVE BOULDER CO 80304 DEER SPRING LP 1351 FREEPORT RD PITTSBURGH PA 15238 VANGALIS, ANTHONY - PEEPLES, PATRICIA E. -JT PO BOX 3007 VAIL CO 81658 HSE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC 12 VAIL RD STE 500' VAIL CO 81657 a TIMBERLINE COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS LLC 12 VAIL RD 600 VAIL CO 81657 VAIL PBK LLC 392 MILL CREEK CIR VAIL CO 81657 KILMUR LLC PO BOX 2879 AVON CO 81620 VAIL GATEWAY PLAZA 12 VAIL RD STE 600 VAIL CO 81657 CENTRAL ROCKIES SPECIALISTS LLC PO BOX 4250 FRISCO CO 80443 VAIL CLINIC, INC. C/O STAN ANDERSON 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL CO 81657 Village Inn Plaza Condominium Association 100 East Meadow Drive, #34, Vail, Colorado 81657 February 4, 2005 Mr. Peter Knobel Crossroads East One, LLC 143 East Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Crossroads Redevelopment Proposal Dear Peter, Regarding changes you are in the process of making for the Crossroads redevelopment, let me note some comments from Village Inn Plaza, Phase III, Condominium Association. 1. We are delighted with your plan to take the underground garage and the other below grade spaces away from the property line (except this is not done adjacent to our east garage entry driveway) so as to remove the danger to the large spruce trees on our side in the central and southern portions of our joint property line. While we would also like to preserve the trees along the more northerly parts of the joint property line, we understand the constraints of the loading dock area which has been requested by the Town. 2. We are also delighted that you have found a way to move all of the garage exhaust and other venting. away from our side of your proposed building. 3. The lowering of some of central portion of your proposed Village Inn Plaza, Phase III, is the moving back of some portions ~, the twenty foot setback line. the roofline, roughly in the building's western fagade facing also a positive step along wit=h of the above grade footprint i~o 4. Your offer to work with us on plans for and to pay fo:r RE: Crossroads Redevelopment, page 2 the installation and maintenance of landscaping between our buildings which would give the area a park or natural area look, possibly containing a recirculating cascade or stream, is a welcome addition to what you propose for Crossroads. 5. We applaud your intent, per the request of the Town. of Vail, to install and heat a system of stepless (or, we hope, nearly so) walkways linking the southwest corner of your building and your building's plaza (via a through-the-building passageway) to the central west-to-east walkway at Village Inn Plaza, Phase III. So that we might be a good neighbor to you and those others around us on East Meadow Drive, we would appreciate the opportunity to talk with you about possible participation in the heating of the plaza sidewalk area in the vicinity of Vail Boot & Shoe and Annie's, particularly since we have no place to put boiler facilities for sidewalk heating there. 6. It appears from the partial plans which I have received this week by E-mail that you have changed the previous 45 degree orientation of the northwest corner of the building (above the loading dock area) to a 90 degree corner, thus possibly affecting the northeasterly views from our building which earlier you had sought to preserve in some form. I am not at this time able to assess the effect on us of this apparent change. 7. We are quite disappointed that you have not found it feasible to have the western section of your. proposed building next to us have heights of even roughly comparable levels to the facing portions, especially the central and southern ones, of Village Inn Plaza, Phase III. Your proposed building still is considerably higher than is ours along much of your new building's western side. There remains no major stepping down from the South Frontage Road to East Meadow Drive, a stepping, down which we were required by the Town of Vail to do. We fully understand that it is not feasible with the building's current design for you to step back from the ground floor footprint on its western side, but I still do wonder whether you might not be able to step the building's western wing down from your present height at the South Frontage Road to two or three stories at East Meadow Drive. Doing so would present a far less massive facade in the central and southern portions of your west wing immediately adjacent to us. You have noted that in line with what you are proposing to do at Crossroads, we could likely receive permission to increase our building's height along East Meadow Drive. For us to do that would have a very direct, and quite negative, effect on many of our homeowners; thus, we do not see that as an option for us to consider even though it might be a profitable endeavor. RE: Crossroads Redevelopment, -page 3 I hope that you will find it possible to continue discussions with us (and others, too) about changes which will make your proposed building (which has many very nice design elements and' which also offers us all a vast improvement over the, shall we just say, ~~aging" Crossroads of today) a more suitable and more welcomed addition to the Vail scene. It would be unfortunate for you to give up discussions now and revert, as you said on Wednesday that you might, to the earlier plan which you seem to feel you may be able to get accepted by a slim majority of the Town Council. We all want to see, and see sooner rather than later, a thriving new Crossroads which will amicably fit with its surroundings, and we don't want to see what you further said is possible: an empty and dead Crossroads, something which would be a detriment to our community. Let us work together with other interests in the community to enable you to bring us what both you and we want: an invigorated Crossroads, bringing new life to Vail both by its economic vitality and by a design which fits beautifully and amicably into its setting. Sincerely yours, D: Deane Hal1,Jr. President Board of Managers Village Inn Plaza, Phase III, Condominium Association k hzcmjioz•atizzg The British House Sign Comp~inX Town of Vail 3/9/05 Planning and Environmental Commission Design Review Board Town Council Dear Town of Vail, Fine Clothing I am writing today to give my support to.the Crossroads project. I attended the last two planning approval sessions before this project was sent to council. I have to say that I arrived at the first meeting somewhat critical of the size. However, after hearing from the project managers and seeing the drawings and comparisons I was converted into a supporter of the project. Now; we have meet with the new Crossroads Management and they have shown us some of the new drawings and described their plans for the retail and other commercial space. I believe that this new structure addresses the bulk and mass concerns voiced by planning officials and council members. We also feel that the team that Mr. Nobel has put together has worked very hard with many members of the community to find out what is needed and how best to go about it. It is really refreshing to see this proactive approach to Unig2se development in this valley when so many greedy developers and landlords Gifts have messed up Vail's true potential. We also discussed the future retail lease structure and were pleasantly surprised to find them very open to our ideas and opinions. The developer wants to create a vibrant town core site that will definitely add to Vail's appeal while also providing for some needed public benefit. I believe that Vail needs to approve the Crossroads project now,so that it is not put off for another year till they can demo/ break ground. Any delay will only hurt a village already struggling with its third year of poor revenues. Almost everyone is agreed that Vail has been desperate for redevelopment for a long time. Now that it is finally starting to happen we must move forward with all projects in an efficient and timely manner. The Crossroads project should be approved by the town so we can start to build Vail's future now. Celtic Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. Origin Sincerely, Robert A. Swimm Owner Scotch on the Rockies Office: P.O. Box 459, VaIl, CO 51655 Tel: 970.745.0022 Fax: 970.74S.0033 email: scotch@vail.net Shop: 242B E.1Vleadow Drove,Vail, CO S1657 Tel: 970.476.1957 Fax: 970.476.2660 estnGlislxd /9S4 21/04 2005 Tgt1 14;58 FAX 303 226 4924 ~~.CLUSIVF It }~ S C) R'1' S'" VIA, I+'A~CSIMILI+J 1V)IACIIINItJ npri121, 2gg5 Mr. Warren Campbell, AICP Senior Pianrzcr, 't'own of Vail 75 South ljrontagc Road Vail, Colorado $1157 Dear Mr. Campbell: It has come to my attention that the Crossroads pz•ojcct in Vail is in the final stages of approval and that one of the Town's potential concerns is l l'-G" floor-to-floor heights. As you z~~ay be aware, Exclusive .Resorts is a n~ajar investor in luxury pxoperties around the world, and we support the planned Crossroads re-development project. We believe that at least 11'-G" fluor-to-floor is cz•itical foz• the success of a building that will contribute to the overall duality of the Y'own of Vail. Nine- to ten-foal clear interior heights are considered mininxums in the J.uxuzy real estate industry, both for hotel roonras and residential units. Extra inches are noticeable even to the untrained eye, especially in residences inmulti-story, multi-unit buildings with open floor plans. Greater room volumes can make up for smaller floor areas since they allow more flexibility for architectural features and acccnts~ larger windows and taller door frames -all features that enhance both tangible ar~d i~tangibie property values. For instance, typical residences at Horizon Pass, a new az~d highly successful project irz Bachelor Gulch, have nine- to ten-foot clear interior l~.eights which affords them a sense of luxury and comfort dcspitc modest floor areas. I ~ The Crossroads re-development project has the poi Vail Village..A,s major investors in tl~e Valley, coy appreciators of Vail's unique character and charm, flooz•-to-floor heights and hope the Town will too. Sincerely, Brian Corbett Director of Rcal Estate toll ~rcr: soo.a47s~ns lax: 303.474.G9Q0 153Q I G,h 5„cci, S,dtc S00 n4,lvtf~ LAlb(nl~ti 8620) inl6QTf.XflUSivf.If.SOtf! 06111 www.OxC.~t,SlvC:fCS(,tlti (:qm the crown jewel in th.e rzew sales tax revenue and the project with 1 i'-6" i -x]002!002 ro