HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-09-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessioni
TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION AGENDA
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, CO 81657
11:00 A.M., TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2005
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and
cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council
will consider an item.
i .Bill Gibson ITEM/TOPIC: Site Visit. An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3,
Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section
12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section
12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter, 12-17, Variances,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448
Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (30 min.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold, overturn, or modify
the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of
variance applications pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail
Town Code.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On July 25, 2005, the Planning
and Environmental Commission approved a variance from Section
12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section
12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition at 1448 Vail
Valley Drive. The appellant, Vail Town Council, "called-up" the
Planning and Environmental Commission's decision at its August
2, 2005, public hearing. Please refer to the staff memorandum to
the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005,
for additional information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Town
Council upholds the Planning and Environmental Commission's
approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a residential. addition at 1448 Vail Valley Drive,
subject to the findings in the staff memorandum dated July 25,
2005.
However, Staff recommends the Town Council overturns the
Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance
from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site
Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition at
1448 Vail Valley Drive, subject to the findings in the staff
memorandum dated July 25, 2005.
2. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update. (30 min.)
BREAK FOR WORKING LUNCH (10 min.)
3. Greg Hall ITEM/TOPIC: Long-term capital plan. (1 'h hrs.)
Stan Zemler
Judy Camp ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to staff presentation
and provide comments.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This presentation is in response to
Council's request for a plan addressing maintenance and
replacement of the town's capital assets. Specifically, we have
been asked to describe how decisions are made concerning when
capital maintenance and replacements are necessary. Capital
maintenance and replacements will be a major portion of the five-
year plans included in the 2006 budget process.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None -information only.
4. Greg Hall ITEMROPIC: ITEM/TOPIC: Discussion of Village Streetscape Mill
Creek Court .Building Construction contract Award for 2005-2006. (15
min.)
ACTION REDUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/ Deny Village
Streetscape Mill Creek Court Building Project Award.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail and Mill Creek Court
Condominium Association cooperatively have designed and have
received a proposal for construction improvements in Vail Village..The
council was advised were under negotiations and it was felt to finishing
the streetscape in this area made since. Staff has negotiated a cost
sharing of the improvements with the condominium association. The
association board has agreed to the proposal. These improvements
include the replacement of planters, steps, landscaping, installation of
snowmelt .system and final streetscape treatments in addition the
association is having their trash dumpster upgraded. The Town of Vail
has reviewed the proposal and with the contractor.
The Project is scheduled to begin Construction later this year and finish
next spring. Staff recommends the council add the required additional
dollars to the supplemental budget to fund the town's portion of the
project. $ 200,000 from RETT and $50,000 from capital projects fund,
the remainder of the project will be funded by the Mill Creek Court
Condominium Association ($205,000) and from the existing Streetscape
budget ($95,000). Direct the Town Manager to execute a change order
to the streetscape contract with B & B Excavating for up to $550,000.
./
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Supplement the Village Streetscape
budgets by $ 200,000 to the RETT portion and $ 50,000 from the
Capital projects fund and direct the Town Manager to execute, a
r
change order with B&B Excavating up to $550,000 to construct the
streetscape improvements around Mill Creek Court Building.
5. Russ Forrest ITEMlTOPIC: A work session to discuss Resolutions #16, Series
of 2005 setting forth language for a ballot question on November
Stn, 2005 to raise the lodging tax to pay for the construction and
operation of the Vail Conference Center and Resolution 17,
Series of 2005 expressing the Town Council's intent in developing
a threshold for collecting up to 1.5% in additional lodging tax for
the conference center. (60 min.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide direction on
additional information needed to consider:
A) Resolution 16, Series of 2005 which sets forth
language to have a ballot measure on November 8th
which would ask voters to increase the lodging tax for
the conference center, and
B) Resolution 17, Series of 2005 which would state the
Town Council's intent on collecting up to 1.5% of new
lodging tax for the conference center.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On August 31St, the Conference
Center Advisory Committee met to review the Guaranteed
Maximum price from Mortenson Construction and proposed ballot
language. At that meeting the Committee unanimously
recommended that the Town Council approve Resolution 16 and
17. Resolution 16 would give the Town Council the authority to
collect up to 1.5% in new lodging tax to pay for the construction
and operation of the conference center. Resolution 17, if
approved, would express the Town Council intent on creating a
trigger mechanism for collecting up to 1.5% in new lodging tax.
6. Stefan Jochum ITEMITOPIC: Biomass Presentation. (30 min.)
A presentation by Stefan Jochum, Village Manager, Lech, Austria
regarding the application and operation of "biomass" steam
generating plants and associated centralized steam heat
distribution systems that serve the Lech community and ski resort.
The purpose of the presentation is to gain an understanding of
environmentally compatible technological solutions available to
assist in the economic utilization of beetle-killed trees and wood
base refuse removed from Vail and the surrounding area.
7. ITEMlTOPIC: Information Update. (10 min.)
8. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor & Council. (30 min.)
9. ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session. C.R.S. 24-6-402 (4) (b). Land
Acquisition Negotiations. (15 min.)
10. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment. (4:20 p.m.)
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BEGIN AT 12 NOON, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 IN THE VAIL TOWN
COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
.~~'
r
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please
call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
v
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: September 6, 2005
SUBJECT: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail
Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-
6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site
Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a
residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC05.0047)
Appellant: Vail Town Council
Planner: Bill Gibson
I. SUBJECT PROPERTY
The subject property is located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1.
II. STANDING OF APPELLANT
The appellant, Vail Town Council, has standing to "call-up"any decision of the Planning and
Environmental Commission, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code.
III. REQUIRED ACTION
The Vail Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission's approval, of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks,
Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter
12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail
Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Pursuant to Sub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make
findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code:
"The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly
on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support
conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this
title (i.e. Title 72, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code) have orhave notbeen met."
IV. BACKGROUND
On June 27, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing to
consider an application for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8,
Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition at 1448 Vail Valley Drive. The applicant's
proposal included a garage, bedroom, bathroom, elevator, and entry addition. This item was
discussed by the Commission and tabled for further discussion at a future public hearing.
The applicant subsequently amended the application by eliminating the proposed bedroom
and bathroom.
The applicant's amended application was reviewed by the Commission at its July 25, 2005,
public hearing. Based upon the evidence and, testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission determined that the proposed variance application met the
criteria for review outlined in Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, and the
Commission approved the application for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks,
Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter
12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail
Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
At its August 2, 2005, public hearing the Vail Town Council "called-up" this Planning and
Environmental Commission decision.
Excerpts from the Staff memorandums to the Planning and Environmental Commission
dated June 27 and July 25, 2005 (see Attachment A and C) and the associated Planning
and Environmental Commission meeting results (see Attachment B and D) have been
attached for reference.
V. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN CODE
Chapter 12-3, Administration and Enforcement !in part)
Section 12-3-3: Appeals (in part)
C. Appeal Of Planning And Environmental Commission Decisions And Design
Review Board Decisions:
7. Authority: The Town Council shallhave the authority to hearand decide appeals
from any decision, determination or interpretation by the Planning and
Environmental Commission or the Design Review Board with respect to the
provisions of this Title and the standards and procedures hereinafter set forth.
2. Initiation: An appeal may be initiated by an applicant, adjacent property owner, or
any aggrieved or adversely affected person from any order, decision,
determination orinterpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission or
the Design Review Board with respect to this Title. "Aggrieved or adversely
affected person"means any person who will sufferan adverse effect to an interest
protected or furthered by this Title. The alleged adverse interest may be shared in
common with other members. of the community at large, but shall exceed in
degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons. The
Administratorshall determine the standing ofan appellant Ifthe appe//antobjects
to the Administrator's determination of standing, the Town Council shall, at a
meeting prior to hearing evidence on the appeal, make a determination as to the
standing of the appellant. If the Town Council determines that the appellant does
not have standing to bring an appeal, the appeal shall not be heard and the
original action or determination stands. The Town Council may also call up a
decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission or the Design Review
Board by a majority vote.of those Council members present.
2
5. Findings: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact
based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact
must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the
requirements of this Title have or have not been met
Chapter 12-17 Variance (in part)
Section 12-17-1: PURPOSE:
A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such
practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistentwith the
objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement,. variances from certain regulations maybe granted. A practical
difficultyor unnecessary physical hardship may resultfrom the size, shape, or
dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from
topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or
from other physicallimitations, street/ocations or conditions in the immediate
vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance
with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
Section 12-17-6: CRITERIA AND.FINDINGS:
A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a variance application, the planning and
environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the
requested variance:
7. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinify; or to attain the
objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities,
and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the
proposed variance.
B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the
following findings before granting a variance:
7. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a granf of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the
same district.
2. That the granting of the
health, safety, or welfare
improvements in the vicinity.
variance will not be detrimental to the public
or materially injurious to properties or
3
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would resultin practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally fo
other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
VI. -STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Setback Varianc
The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council upholds the
Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6,
Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow
for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing
1, and setting forth details.in regard thereto _
On an appeal, the Town Council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on
the particular evidence. presented to it. These findings of fact must support
conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title
12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, have or have not been met
Should the Town Council choose to uphold the Planning and Environmental Commission's
approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to
Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1; the Community Development
Department recommends the Town Council make the following findings:
"1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District, since a similar setback variance for a garage addition to this
residence was approved by the Town of Vail in 1991 as funherdiscussed in the Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or irrprovements in the vicinity.
3. This .variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strictliteral interpretation orenforcementofthespecifiedregulation would
resultin practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, due to the
configuration of the existing structure on the site. Additionally, a similar setback
variance for a garage addition to this residence was approved by the Town of
Vail in 1991 as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005.
4
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in
the same district, due to the configuration of the existing structure on the site.
Additionally, a similar setback variance for a garage addition to this residence
was approved by the Town of Vail in 1991 as further discussed in the Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25,
2005.
c. The .strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in
the same district, due to the configuration of the existing structure on the site.
Additionally, a similar setback variance for a garage addition to this residence
was approved by the Town of Vail in 1991 as further discussed iri the Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25,
2005. "
Site Coverage Variance
The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council overturns
the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section.12-6C-9,
Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/L' of 18, Block 3, Vail Village
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
On an appeal, the Town Council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the
particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the
standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail
Town Code, have or have not been met. ,
Should the Town Council choose to overturn the Planning and Environmental
Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition,
located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1; the Community
Development Department recommends the Town Council make the following findings:
"1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District, since a garage addition can be constructed in conformance with
the site coverage limits and those proposed additions in excess of the site coverage
limits also exceed the gross residential floor area limits as further discussed in the
Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25,
2005.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. This variance is not warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strictliteral interpretation orenforcementofthesyecified regulation would
not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent
with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, since a
garage addition can be constructed in conformance with the site coverage limits
5
and those proposed additions in excess of the site coverage limits also exceed
the gross residential floor area limits as further discussed in the .Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25,
2005.
b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district, since a garage addition can be constructed in
conformance with the site coverage limits and those proposed additions in
excess of the site coverage limits also exceed the gross residential floor area
limits as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in
the same district, since a garage addition can be constructed in conformance
with the site coverage limits and those proposed additions in excess the site
coverage limits also exceed the gross residential floor area limits as further
discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental
Commission dated July 25, 2005."
Density Control (i.e. GRFA) Variance
The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council overturns
the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-8,
Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village
Filing 1, and setting forth details iri regard thereto.
On an appeal, the Town Council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the
particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the
standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail
Town Code, have or have not been met.
Should the Town Council choose to overturn the Planning and Environmental
Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, Vail Town
Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential
addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, .Vail Village Filing 1; the
Community Development Department recommends the Town Council make the following
findings:
"1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District, since the residence was originally constructed under Town of
Vail jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the gross residential floor
area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to increase the size limits for
structures within the Two-Family Residential District and the existing residence
exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions in excess of the gross residential
floorarea limits also exceed the site coverage limits as furtherdiscussed in the Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005.
2. The granting of this variance will notbe detrimental to the public health, safely, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
6
3. This variance is not warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning. Regulations, Vail Town
Code, since the residence was originally constructed under Town of Vail
jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the gross residential
floor area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to increase the size
limits forstructures within the Two-Family Residential Districtand the existing
residence exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions in excess of the
gross residential floor area limits also exceed the site coverage limits as
further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005.
b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district, since the residence was originally constructed
under Town of Vail jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the
gross residential floor area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to
increase the size limits forstructures within the Two-Family Residential District
and the existing residence exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions
in excess of the gross residential floor area limits also exceed the site
coverage limits as furtherdiscussed in the Staffinemorandum to the Planning
and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district, since the residence was originally constructed
under Town of Vail jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the
gross residential floor area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to
increase the size limits forstructures within the Two-Family Residential District
and the existing residence exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions
in excess of the gross residential floor area limits also exceed the site
coverage limits as furtherdiscussed in the Staffinemorandum to the Planning
and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005."
VII. ATTACHMENTS
A. June. 27, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum
B. June 27, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting results
C. July 25, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum
D. July 25, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting results
E. Public Notice
7
Attachment: A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department.
DATE: June 27, 2005
SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks,
Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant
to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition,
located. at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC05-0047)
Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by
Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
SUMMARY
The applicants, Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon &
Hopkins Architects, are requesting a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section
12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-
17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail
Valley Drive/Lot 18; Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1.
Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends approval, with conditions, of the setback variance request; approval,
with conditions, of the site coverage variance request; and denial of the GRFA
variance request subject to the findings noted in Section IX of this memorandum.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicants, Robert Stephenson, Jr, and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon &
Hopkins Architects, are proposing to construct a garage .addition to Units 18A
(Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus a new entry, elevator, and bedroom addition to
Unit 18A: The new garage addition will widen the existing three car garage to the west
toycreate a four car garage (two spaces per dwelling.unit). Above this garage addition
the applicant is proposing to construct a new 272 sq. ft. bedroom and bathroom. To the
west of the proposed garage addition the applicant is proposing to construct a new 110
sq. ft. single-story front entry room with a 42 sq. ft. three-story elevator addition. The
applicant is also proposing to widen the existing driveway and construct a new exterior
stair from the driveway to the third-floor entry to Unit 18A.
The proposed garage addition to Units 18A and 18B encroaches into the front setback
and exceeds the allowable site coverage for this property. The proposed entry and
elevator on Unit 18A exceed both site coverage and GRFA, and the bedroom addition
also exceeds the allowable GRFA.
A vicinity map (Attachment A), site photographs (Attachment B), amore detailed
description of the applicant's request (Attachments C), and the proposed architectural
plans (Attachment D) have been attached for reference.
III. BACKGROUND
This two-family residence was originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976
and construction was completed in 1978. The original approved architectural plans
blend the overlapping garage level (finished floor elevation 8267') and the mechanical
level (finished floor elevation 8277') into one "basement plan" even though these levels
are separated by a floor-to-floor .measurement of 10 feet. According to the Town of
Vail's records, this structure was originally allowed 5,261 sq. ft. of GRFA. However,
5,491 sq. ft. of GRFA was constructed and a final certificate of occupancy was issued.
Therefore, in 1978 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA by 230 sq. ft. , It is
unclear how the GRFA was calculated for this structure at that time.
At some point irr time a party wall was constructed to separate the garage level parking
spaces, and a portion of the garage level located directly below the storage room on the
mechanical level was converted from a parking space into a storage room (i.e. GRFA).
On June 24, 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front
setback variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of
the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot
setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Even though the Town's GRFA
regulations had been amended several times since 1978, GRFA calculations were not
done at the time of this variance approval.
In 1999, allowed and existing GRFA calculations were conducted. According to Town of
Vail records, the allowable GRFA in 1999 for this lot was 5,205 sq. ft., plus each unit was
eligible for one "250 Addition" for a total of 5,705 sq. ft. However, the existing GRFA
calculations (including a "250 Addition" for the Schofield residence) were 6,393 sq. ft.
Therefore. in 1999, this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA calculations by 1,188 sq.
ft. and 688 sq. ft. when two "250 Additions" were included in the calculations. It is
unclear how the GRFA was calculated in 1999, but it appears that no portion of the
garage level or mechanical level (shown on a single "basement plan" drawing) was
counted as GRFA; even though the entire mechanical level qualified as GRFA and the
unapproved garage level storage ,room also qualified as GRFA. Recalculating the
garage and mechanical levels using 1999 GRFA methods, the structure has 7,500 sq. ft.
of GRFA. Therefore, in 1999 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA (plus two "250
Additions") by 1,795 sq. ft. .
In 2004, the Town's GRFA regulations were again amended. Under these new
regulations, this property is now allowed 7,286 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure,
including the appropriate portions of the garage level and the appropriate portions of the
mechanical level, has 8,801 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure. exceeds today's
allowable GRFA by 1,515 sq. ft. The applicant is currently proposing to add an
additional 466 sq. ft. of bedroom, entry, and elevator GRFA, thus proposing to exceed
the current GRFA limits by 1,981 sq. ft. (approximately 27%).
This proposal is scheduled for review by the Design Review Board at its July 6, 2005,
public hearing.
2
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES
Order of Review: Generally, variance applications will be reviewed by the Planning and
Environmental Commission, and then any accompanying design review application will
be reviewed by the Design Review Board.
Planning and Environmental Commission:
The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval, approval
with modifications, or denial of a variance application, in accordance with Chapter 12-17,
Variances, Vail Town Code.
Design Review Board:
The Design Review Board has no review authority over a variance application.
However, the Design Review Board is responsible for the final approval, approval with
modifications, or denial of any accompanying design review application.
Town Council:
The Town Council has the authority to hear and decide appeals from any decision,
determination, or interpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission and/or
Design Review Board. The Town Council may also call up a .decision of the Planning
and Environmental Commission and/or Design Review Board.
Staff:
The Town Staff facilitates the application review process. Staff reviews the submitted
application materials for completeness and general compliance with the appropriate
requirements of the Town Code. Staff also provides the Planning and Environmental
Commission a memorandum containing a description and background of the application;
an evaluation of the application in regard to the criteria and findings outlined by the Town
Code; and a recommendation of approval, approval with modifications, or denial.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff believes that the following provisions of .the Vail Town Code are relevant to the
review of this proposal:
TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIONS
Article 12-6C: Two-Family Residential (R) District (in part)
72-6C-7: PURPOSE:
The two-family residential district is .intended to provide sites for low
density single-family or two-family residential uses, together with such
public facilities as may be appropriately located in the same district. The
two-family residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air,
privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single-
familyand two-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential
qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site development
standards.
3
12-6C-6: SETBACKS:
In the R district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the
minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear
setback shall be fifteen feet (15').
12-6C-8: DENSITY CONTROL:
A. Dwelling Units: Not more than a total of two (2) dwelling units shall be
permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on existing
lots less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet.
B. Gross Residential Floor Area:
1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on
each site:
a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential floor
area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first
ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus
b. Thirty eighf (38) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over
ten thousand (10,000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen thousand
(15, 000) square feet of site area; plus
c. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA)
for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen
thousand (15,000) square feet, not exceeding. thirty thousand
(30, 000) square feet of site area; plus
d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for
each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty
thousand (30, 000) square feet.
12-6C-9: SITE COVERAGE:
Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total site area.
Chapter 12-17: Variances (in part)
12-17-1: Purpose:
A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical
difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of
this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement,
variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of
a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical
conditions. on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical
limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or
inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation
shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
4
VI. SITE ANALYSIS
Address:
Legal Description:
Zoning:
Land Use Plan Designation:
Current Land Use:
Lot Size:
1448 Vail Valley Drive
Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1
Two-Family Residential
Low Density Residential
Two-Family Dwelling
21,045 sq. ft. (0.48 acres)
Standard Allowed/Reouired Existin
Setbacks (min):
Front: 20 ft.
Sides 15 ft.
Rear: 15 ft.
Height (max.): 30 ft./33 ft.
Density (max): ~ 2 dwellings
GRFA (max): 7,286 sq. ft.
Site coverage (max.): 4,209 sq. ft.
Landscape Area (min.): 12,627 sq. ft.
Parking (min.):
18A (West) 4
18B (East) 3
20 ft.
29 ft./ 21 ft.
53 ft.
2 dwellings
8,801 sq. ft.
3,843 sq. ft.
Proposed
17 ft.
22 ft./ 21 ft.
no change
no change
9,270 sq. ft. (+466 sq. ft.)
4,488 sq. ft. (+645 sq. ft.)
4 (2 enclosed)4 (2 enclosed)
2 (1 enclosed) 4 (2 enclosed)
VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Land Use Zoning
North: Residential Two-Family Residential
South: Mixed Use N/A (White River National Forest)
East: Residential Two-Family Residential
West: Residential Two-Family Residential
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12-16, Vail
Town Code.
A. Consideration of Factors Regarding Variances:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
This proposed addition is associated with a remodel of an existing
residence originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976 with
construction completed in 1978. The applicant is proposing to construct a
garage addition that, due to the orientation of the structure to the property
line and Vail Valley Drive, encroaches three feet into the required 20 foot
front 'setback. In 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission
approved a front setback variance to allow for the construction of an
additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages. This proposed
garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this
addition was never constructed. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed
5
setback variance for this proposed garage addition will not be detrimental
to the existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
2.
This proposed garage addition 'will cause the structure to exceed the
maximum allowable site coverage for this property. .However, the
proposed garage addition will increase the existing three car garage to a
four car garage (two spaces for each dwelling unit) which is one the
Town's development objectives encouraged by the Towri's zoning
regulations. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed site coverage
variance necessary for this garage addition will not be detrimental to the
existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
This existing residence currently exceeds the allowable GRFA for this site
by 1,506 sq. ft., which is 21%GRFA than is allowed for other residences
in the same zone district. The .applicant is proposing the addition of a
new entry, elevator, and bedroom that will further increase the non-
conformity of this property. Should the Planning and Environmental
Commission choose to approve this request; the structure will exceed the
allowable GRFA by 1,972 sq. ft. This is 27% more GRFA than is allowed
for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does not believe
deviations from the GRFA regulations to this degree are in keeping with
the bulk/mass and general character of the Two-Family zone district.
Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance request
and site coverage request associated with the proposed entry, elevator,
and bedroom are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of
the neighboring properties.
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity
or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special
privilege. ,
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition that, due to the
orientation of the structure to the property line and Vail Valley Drive,
encroaches three feet into the required 20 foot front setback. In 1991, the
Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback
variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the
east of the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet
into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed.
Therefore, Staff believes the proposed setback variance is necessary to
achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment. among sites in the
vicinity or to attain the Town's development objectives. As the Planning
and Environmental Commission has historically approved several similar
setback variance requests, Staff does not believe approval of this request
will constitute a grant of special privilege.
This proposed garage addition will cause the structure to exceed the
maximum allowable site coverage for this property. However, the
proposed garage addition will increase the existing three car garage to a
four car garage (two spaces for each dwelling unit) which is one the
6
Town's development objectives encouraged by the Town's zoning
regulations. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed site coverage
variance necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity or to attain the Town's development objectives.
As the Planning and Environmental Commission has historically approved
several similar setback variance requests, Staff does not believe approval
of this request will constitute a grant of special privilege.
This existing residence currently exceeds the allowable GRFA for this site
by 1,515 sq. ft.; which is 21 % more GRFA than is allowed for other
residences in the same zone district. The applicant is proposing the
addition of a new entry, elevator, and bedroom that will further increase
the non-conformity of this property. ~ Should the Planning and
Environmental Commission choose to approve this request; the structure
will exceed the allowable GRFA by 1,981 sq. ft. This is 27% more GRFA
than is allowed for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does
not believe deviations from the GRFA. regulations to this degree are in
keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the Two-Family zone
district. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance
request and site coverage request associated with the proposed entry,
elevator, and bedroom are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general
character of the neighboring properties. Staff also believes approval of
the proposed GRFA variance request and site coverage request
associated with the proposed entry, elevator, and bedroom would be a
grant of special privilege. As this property already exceeds the maximum
allowable GRFA, so does not believe a further increase is appropriate.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff does not believe this proposal will have a significant impact on the
public health; safety or welfare, public facilities, utilities, or light and air in
comparison to existing conditions of the site.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable
to the proposed variance.
The design review application associated with this proposal is tentatively
scheduled for review by the Town of Vail Design Review Board at its July
6, 2005, public hearing.
B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings
before granting a variance:
That the ,granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
7
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement.of the specified regulation.
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
IX.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Setback Variance
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of
a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18,
Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This
recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this
memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the~following motion:
The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request
for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17,
Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth
details in regard thereto, subject to the following condition:
1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of
Vail approval of the design review application associated with this variance
request.
Should the .Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes '
the following findings:
The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance .will not constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District.
8
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. The strict interpretation-or enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same district.
Site Coverage Variance
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of
a variance from Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot
18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This
recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this
memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request
for a variance from. Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17,
Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth
details in regard thereto, subject to the following condition:
1. This approval shall only be for the approximately 124 sq. ft. of additional
site coverage necessary for the construction of the proposed garage
addition. The additional site coverage granted by this variance shall not be
used to accommodate the construction of any other addition to this
structure.
2. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of
Vail approval of the design review application associated with this variance
request.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes
the following findings:
9
The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title ~12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the speciled regulation would
deprive. the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same district.
Density Control Variance
The Community Development Department recommends denial of a variance from
Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block
3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation
is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant's
request for a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to
Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential
garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes
the following findings:
10
The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would .not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances . or conditions
applicable to. the same. site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district.
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Applicant's Request
C. Site Photographs
D. Architectural Plans
E. Public Hearing Notice
11
:.-. 1.... ..
Attachment: B
.~ ~'`:
l L1~ S ~ _ ~ .S
t ~ ~ ~ t
`~ I
~~ ~ ' '
t
... ~ ~ -~- F: ~:
~.r `~ x" r ~ ,~~ -s ~ 3 ~
~ ~~, ~~~ i
i
,.~`~D~~r 4 i
++ T T~i^
+t !.
? {~ ~ ~~~
a
,,c
_ ;~~i~.i
~`
' y t
1 i• ~~ d~t~ . ~
- -.., ... ~~~ . wh. .~F ,.
,,
~k
~~-.
,.,a
;
._. _
?_~ ~~~1 ,.,~
i. ~~l ~ f
'`
til ~~
~r ..~ ~. , ~ `-
~ 1
.1 ~~
~ y~ ~~4
1
7
~
~
~~`` ~i
~
~k
.
;
~ ~ .
~
.
,a
~~~ X ~';'~'~1
~ ~' ~
~ ,~
1w
J
~
~
,~
+
I.y
~
~,.~,~, I :I._
J C \ i
r..~ .,,,
f t ~,~
~„ -
,,,t
~.
',~:
~~ _ _ .-
{. '
~'
~~
.~. ~'
r,~ ''
~A ~
t ttT~~.. ~` f ;~
} ~,:
.,
~,~: .:. ~ - t.-:
~~
~,
~ ... r ~
~\
...
z
~r
tom,
~~~
~ i-~ ~-~i
4 r
~ ~ ~ ~ _.
.may :- , ~
~~>. ` ~ t
;~~ r~,. sg ~,, ~.
~.~ ~ ~x ~:
y;
~~
,--
,~-
-: ~ -~_t ~
,s ~a~
{ E ~ _ ^ ~.+
,r
~rs:
._,~
,~
~,,
,`7~~„ti
~. .:~
fir.;
r i
t
/ ~' 1 ti.
4 w .... jam` r~~. T i ~q./,~T(~J~j,
.. y ~i~7 J ~, ~ w ,'M
,"'/w' -.. _ ~ -+~y,' :.P ~ fib? 1
~.
r
~--
Attachment: C _ _ _
~{ ,.
~ ~~ ~ ~~
The duplex on Lot 18 was built in 1976. The owner of 18A is proposing to enlarge the
very small 3-car garage for 18A (2 spaces) and 18B (1 space), add a ground level entry
with elevator and a guest bedroom.
This proposal requires 3 variances:
FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE
The owner of 18A, with full support of the owner of 18B, is proposing expanding the
existing 681.9 sq. ft. 3-car garage (2 cars for 18A and 1 car for 18B) to 1,176.12 sq. ft.
for 4 cars. This addition meets the Town of Vail parking standards for 2-car garage.per
unit. This addition requires the cooperation of both owners and due to the existing
garage location, there is no other alternative for expanding. This variance is for the
northeast corner of the existing garage, expanding 2.5 feet to the north. This increases
the garage depth from 20 feet to 22.5 feet.
a. This variance improves the use for today's larger cars and updates the use
and appearance of the existing structure. The upgrades-are in keeping with
neighborhood standards.
b. There is no other location for the garage expansion.
c. There is no effect on light and air.
d. This is exactly what the Town of Vail planning policies and development
objectives encourages.
SITE COVERAGE VARIANCE: for 279.25 sq. ft.
Lot 18 allowable site coverage 4,209 sq. ft.
Lot 18 proposed site coverage 4.488.25 sg. ft.
Variance 279.25 sq. ft.
The proposal includes 155 sq. ft. for an entry and elevator for 18A and 490 sq. ft. for the
garage addition.
a. This variance improves the use and appearance of the existing structure.
b. The expanded garage meets the Town of Vail parking standards and
achieves compatibility with the neighborhood.
c. This variance does not affect light and air.
d. This variance meets the Town of Vail parking standards and complies with
the intent of the Town of Vail planning policies and development objectives.
PO Box 3340 Vail, Colorado 81658 Phone: 970-476-2201 Fax: 970-476-7491
GRFA VARIANCE: for 1,830.59 sq. ft. GRFA
Existing GRFA for 18A and 18B 8,647.44 sq. ft.
Allowable GRFA 7,285.85 sq. ft.
Proposed GRFA for 18A and 18B 9,116344 sq. ft.
This duplex has two levels below grade; the garage level and the mechanical room
level. The mechanical level is completely below grade. This level should not be
included in the GRFA calculations under the new Town of Vail planning objectives.
18A Mechanical Level GRFA 521.2 sq. ft.
18B Mechanical Level GRFA 1,272.6 sg. ft. ,
1,793.8 sq. ft. should be deleted
This would leave a 36.2 sq. ft. (1,830.5 [requested variance] - 1,793.8 sq. ft.) GRFA for
development improvement to a 30-year old building for a ground level entry (the existing
is 2 levels up) and a new elevator and new guest room. .
a. This variance request would have been included in the old 250 sq. ft. variance
for anon-conforming building. The remodeling and improvements of this
property is in keeping with the other structures in the vicinity.
b. This variance and interpretation of the mechanical level is in keeping with the
intention of the Town of Vail planning objectives and the Town of Vail's
encouragement of upgrading 30-year old properties.
c. This variance does not affect light and air.
d. THIS IS EXACTLY THE INTENT OF THE NEW TOWN OF VAIL PLANNING
POLICIES AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES.
nw~ia ar v.../ Q,
l0T 19
VAIL VALLEY DRIVE
m •.n..l
UNPLATTED
CURVE TABLE
<uxK N~DiuS L(xDM Cxpy DC~RIMD DR*~
~K~~= ~
~~
GRAPFBC SCALE
111.a~ n~In
to~ty
ua,c ~ ~m::~ro..'~. a .,~ ..m .,.cns r1 R crm.rte
517E COVERAGE
ufdl SpUARE FEET A0RE5 PERCENTAGE
iB4 • 1 x
~~ ~ 190--
UNIT pRI VE WAY
1 1.
1~ 1.
1B
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP k ILC
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTTFICATE
LOT IBA, LOt 188, PARCEL IRC. BLOCK
VAB. VALLEY FIRSf FILING
EAGLE COUNtY, COLORADO
we l><s R[M~Fa.~ SREEt t of I
D
3
v
Ug7=
a d
~~
`~
a
.s
a
0
F 3
A ~~
9~
b°_['AP~ S
ta,P.N „~
} .i.
(7
2
J
li.
H
Z ~
O .
F- ~
~ W
O
Q J
W Q
U
Z J
W Q
O ~
N
w ~"~ O
~ Y O
Z U
z m O
O
= ao V
a
W ~ '~
~ 0 ~
~ _g
~ ,
g.
b ~ ~~
A 1
i
~--
M~-'htANICAL•
Ib i7
_~ ~
AY
MUb ISM
d+tzi~+~~~~~~~~J~~~[[~~~~
s(ap~6 MK~VJ-IIGhI.
roFVSm ...,~, IbA
t
i
~~
-1---
_a j
!F
idx, gn.~e+~
I~"e 'tan ~ t~xwyrlrY 2G/+r=
I P~ow~l"( ~ ~
' er.~.. I ~ ibn I
~"-"
4ri i
fPOR+tKD hLgNM - hD.75A
-_ ~a~
_I . .. ~ _..._ ~..p _ ,
28.It .- - - ~_. _._. _
MUb Y~1.1
~----
~-~ --,~~~.m.,z
-f- r-----
--t
i~~l
I ! ~ ,
I
I ~
I r ~r-+~.v •~ ~orz I
I 'h4Pk.~E - Ib
h .
_ i
~
I I ~
I
~
__II I I i ~ I
~
1___-_ _L~ ~ ~ ~ -z-_ J_-_
e
:;
AI ~
- - -- - - -- ~d*PAC~ I.~~L ~ Mt-IrtW~llcnl.- L~-"~L
4Io
U 7~~
K~
e
c
~~
N n~
V
Z
J
LL
F-
Z ~
0
H ~
~ W
Q J
~..~
W Q ~
G ~
w M 0
~ Y
°mo
0
= ao U
W H "`~
N O ~
r$
'~ ~~~
A2
U ~~
a a~
~~
v
_c
0
g OBa~F
A M~
O
fA a
~-
V
Z
J
LL
H
Z ~
O.
F:. LL
0 }
~ W
Q J
W Q
U
Z J
W Q
O
w~">O
~ Y ~
Z m O
O
= ao V
a r'
W H J
F- O Q
fn J >
~ o~
~ ~.
~ ~ ~~
A'3
[717
~~
~~`_.
'~ ~\-
Ibb
Al
.....____ __ ~ 1~1 C1bG
_._ _-
e~-
0 ~ --
mu ~yCCH4~
s+s~4.~' 7'
L-~ ! L-
i r~~e~ i
~r0 µ
I
I ~ .
I ~
L-____ y
_ _ Ib D~a L-l3VbG ADDiTWI~ _..... _ _
Y(I1KO'~ M~11
a~rm'ic -Z
~-
® ® ^
~ ~ MPCHMI_ Ib~L .F,
a
® ~ ~~NB VCNS1rp-
vepJNlNe wtw
~~b,
no~fH ~I~EVA'("lOh1
------~, _-ir,~, -
U
a ~a
~~
m
c
3
v
0
~ ~~
g3
N
_Z
J
z~
i
~ LL
Q
Q llJ
Q J
U ~
2 J_
^a
~ ~
~ Y QO
Z V J
Z ~ OLL
=ooU
_J
F- O Q
to J ~
o
~ .
~ ~ ~~
~ w
U p~
a 77dy
~~
c
0
~ a
~ ~~
di
~~e
~_. ___ p~iH.3
rMirfep
-~- ~ -_
~.~~r ~
_ ~~ ~11py
br c~
~ ~~~~
_... ~ rn~a-~_.
b?/h 6~
-!~ e•
i I
-.\.. ~.____..__.__._.~._... _. _. _______._.___... _l
V
Z
LL
H
O ~
f= ~-
o ~
o w
Q J
V ~ ICI
Z r
W Q
~ ~
W °"~ O i
~ X D
y ~ O
Z m ~
= oo U
W F- J
N ~
O~
~ ~~
A5
lam ~~y(~IDN
63H.o .
e~ia.n'
02'14. b
esa~.v'..
6iy .O~.
a ~
~~
yU ~
Q
C
6
O
Z 4
O d
~ ~~
O
C u~
fn >
O
Z
J
F"'
Z
_O .
~"' LL
~ W
a J
W a
U >
Z J
W Q
~ ~
w<"~O
~ Y ~
Z m O
W O
= ao" U
a ,..
W F- J
Boa
fn J ~
oe
E fl
~ .
~ -
A6
b01~, a ~.
OL16.o~
A bLbD.t~.
~7te
L bLr ~.an
U
n:
~~
~ a
c
3
qq~gg8g8
R
N
n~
Z
J
lL
L~
Z ~
O_
0
~ W
Q J
W Q
U >
Z J
W Q
O ~
N
w ~"~ O
~ Y ~
Z V.
Z m 0
= ao U
a ~'
W F- J
~ O Q
fn J ~
r
o
~ ~ ~~
A7
IS F~ ov~lOF~-
Ya,P~
,.. .
~~ ,.
I
i
~.
~1
I.
I~
.~.
,.
_.:~~
.,
~:~ .
~;
Attachment: E
~~
TOWN of YAIL ~'~
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE. IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the
Town of .Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6,. Vail Town
Code, on June 27, 2005, at 2:00 pm; in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in
consideration of:
A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant .to Chapter 13=12,
Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an amendment to an
existing. platted building envelope, located at 1463 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 88, Lion's
Ridge Filing 4, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Robert and Kristine.Selby, represented by John Martin Architect, LLC
Planner: Bill Gibson ~ '
A request for final review of a floodplain modification, pursuant to Chapter 14-6, Grading
Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow far the bridge reconstruction, located at the
Westhaven Drive Bridge and Pedestrian/Skier Bridge (a more complete description is
available at the Department of Community Development offces); and setting forth details
in regard thereto.
Applicant: Cascade Village Metropolitan District, represented by Lonco, Inc.
Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12- ~~`'~'~
6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, ~I4~ti7
Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley 1
Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Ullage Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. ~ U
Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon 8~
Hopkins. Architects
Planner... ~ Brill Gibson
A request for a final review of . a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-4,
Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second Floor and Above, Vail Town Code, to allow for
a professional office and studio, located at 450 East Lionshead Circle (Treetops
Building), Lot 6, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
' Planner. Bill Gibson
A request for a final review of a conditional use. permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3,
Parking, Vail Town Code, to allow for a revision to the approved parking plan at the Vail
Valley Medical Center, located at 181 East Meadow Drive/Lots E and F, Vail Village
Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Mauriello Planning Group,
LLC
Planner: Matt Gennett
Attachment: B
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING
June 27, 2005 (Excerpt)
5. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section
12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-
17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail
Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant:Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon 8~
Hopkins Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to July 11, 2005
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 6-0-0
Bill Gibson presented the project according to the memorandum.
Pam Hopkins introduced the project. She explained the scope, background, .and
reasoning for project.
John Schofield further explained the variance requests, adding that some
discrepancy regarding the GRFA could be related to the fact that the methods for
calculating GRFA within the Town have changed many times. He commented that a
similar setback variance had been granted for this lot and similar site coverage and
GRFA variances had been approved for other lots. He explained how he believed
the below grade portions of the house should not count as GRFA.
No public comment was added.
Bill Jewitt commented that he was in opposition to constructing an additional
bedroom through a GRFA variance. Regarding the lowest level basement argument,
he mentioned his support of changing the GRFA regulations. However, Regardless,
his opposition to a GRFA variance remains. Regarding site coverage, he had some
difficulty in determining the hardship that was used to constitute a variance from the
regulations.
Rollie Kjesbo agreed that any square footage below grade should not be calculated
as GRFA. However, the currently non-conforming state of the residence's GRFA
should not allow a variance for further non-conformity. Regarding the site coverage
variance request, the fact that the residence was built within the Town of Vail
negated a request for such a variance.
George Lamb agreed with the Commissioners who had already spoken, stating his
faith in Staffs calculations. In terms of site coverage, he expressed interest in site
coverage variances which were granted to properties that were built in the Town and
according to Town regulations. The parking situation would be improved by the
construction of a garage, however. He was in favor of some solution, but thought
that it should not include increased GRFA.
David Viele commented that he was not necessarily in agreement with the new
GRFA regulations. However, the applicant did not show a hardship that warranted a
variance from such regulations.
Chas Bernhardt commented that he would like to see the item tabled and proposed
somewhat differently at the following meeting.
John Schofield added that perhaps simply an entry elevator and a garage could
remain a part of the proposal.
Bill Gibson clarified that the elevator would be calculated as GRFA on each level of
the structure.
Bill Jewitt commented that the' GRFA request may be more palatable if the site
coverage variance was eliminated.
Pam Hopkins replied that one of the Town's wishes was to enclose parked vehicles.
John Schofield said that site coverage was available upon the lot for a garage and
the entry elevator.
Doug Cahill asked if the applicant would be willing to table. the, item, to which the
applicant replied affirmatively.
2
Attachment: C
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 25, 2005
SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks,
Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant
to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition,
located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC05-0047)
Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by
Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
SUMMARY
The applicants, Robert~Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon 8~
Hopkins Architects, are requesting a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section
12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-
17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail
Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3; Vail Village Filing 1.
Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented, .'the Community Development Department
recommends approval, with conditions, of the setback variance request; denial, of
the site coverage variance request; and denial of the GRFA variance request
subject to the findings noted in Section IX of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
On June 20, 2005, the .Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the
applicants' proposal to construct a garage addition and widen the driveway for Units 18A
(Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus construct a new entry, elevator, and bedroom
addition and a new exterior stair case for Unit 18A. This previous proposal required
variances from the setback, site coverage, and GRFA standards of the Two-Family
Residential District. The Commission was generally supportive of the setback variance
request; however, the Commission was not favorable toward the requested GRFA and
site coverage variances. Since that meeting, the applicant has amended the proposal
by eliminating the proposed bedroom addition and extending the elevator to all floors of
the building.
The applicants, Robert Stephenson,. Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon &
Hopkins Architects, are proposing to construct a garage addition to Units 18A
(Stephenson) and 18B (Schofield); plus a new entry and elevator addition to Unit 18A.
The new garage addition will widen the existing three car garage to the west to create a
four car garage (two spaces per dwelling unit). To the west of the proposed garage
addition the applicant is proposing to construct a new 100 sq. ft. single-story front entry
room with a 45 sq. ft. five-story elevator addition (total of 225 sq.ft.). The applicant is
also proposing to widen the existing driveway and construct a new exterior stair from the
driveway to the third-floor entry to Unit 18A.
The applicant is requesting a 2% encroachment into the front setback, a GRFA variance
for an additional 325 sq. ft. (the structure currently exceeds the allowable GRFA limits),
and a. site coverage variance for an additional 129 sq. ft. The applicant's revised
architectural drawings have been attached for reference (Attachment A).
III. BACKGROUND
This two-family residence was originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976
and construction was completed in 1978. The original approved architectural plans
blend the overlapping garage level (finished floor elevation 8267') and the mechanical
level (finished floor elevation 8277') into one "basement plan" even though these levels
are separated by a floor-to-floor measurement of 10 feet. According to the Town of
Vail's records, this structure was originally allowed 5,261 sq. ft. of GRFA. However,
5,491 sq. ft. of GRFA was constructed and a final certificate of occupancy was issued.
Therefore, in 1978 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA by 230 sq. ft. It is
unclear how the GRFA was calculated for this structure at that time.
AY some point in time a party wall was constructed to separate the garage level parking
spaces, and a portion of the garage level located directly below the storage room on the
mechanical level was converted from a parking space into a storage room (i.e. GRFA).
On June 24, 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front
setback variarce to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of
the existing garages: This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot
setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Even though the Town's GRFA
regulations had been amended several times since 1978, GRFA calculations were not
done at the time of this variance approval.
In 1999, allowed and existing GRFA calculations were conducted. According to Town of
Vail records, the allowable GRFA in 1999 for this lot was 5,205 sq. ft., plus each unit was
eligible for one "250 Addition" for a total of 5,705 sq. ft. However, the existing GRFA
calculations (including a "250 Addition" for the Schofield residence) were 6,393 sq. ft.
Therefore in 1999, this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA calculations by 1,188 sq.
ft. and 688 sq. ft. when two "250 Additions" were included in the calculations. ~ It is
unclear how the GRFA was calculated in 1999, but it appears that no portion of the
garage level or mechanical level (shown on a single "basement plan" drawing) was
counted as GRFA; even though the entire mechanical level qualified as GRFA and the
unapproved garage level storage room also qualified as GRFA. Recalculating the
garage and mechanical levels using 1999 GRFA methods, the structure has 7,500 sq. ft.
of GRFA. Therefore, in 1999 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA (plus two "250
Additions") by 1,795 sq. ft.
In 2004, the Town's GRFA regulations were again amended. Under these new
regulations, this property is now allowed 7,286 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure,
including the appropriate portions of the garage level and the appropriate portions of the
mechanical level, has 8,801 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure exceeds today's
2
allowable GRFA by 1,515 sq. ft. The applicant is currently proposing to add an
additional 466 sq. ft. of bedroom, entry, and elevator GRFA, thus proposing to exceed
the current GRFA limits by 1,981 sq. ft. (approximately 27%).
On June 20, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the
applicants' proposal to construct a garage addition and widen the driveway for Units 18A
(Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus construct a new entry, elevator, and bedroom
addition and a new exterior stair case for Unit 18A. This previous proposal required
variances from the setback, site coverage, and GRFA standards of the Two-Family
Residential District. The Commission was generally supportive of the setback variance
request; however, the Commission was not favorable toward the requested GRFA and
site coverage variances. The applicant has since amended this proposal by eliminating
the proposed bedroom and extending the proposed elevator to all five stories.
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES
Order of Review: Generally, variance applications will be reviewed by the Planning and
Environmental Commission, and then any accompanying design review application will
be reviewed. by the Design Review Board.
Planning and Environmental Commission:
The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval, approval
with modifications, or denial of a variance application, in accordance with Chapter 12-17,
Variances, Vail Town Code.
Design Review Board:
The Design Review Board has no review authority over a variance application.
However, the Design Review Board is responsible for the final approval, approval with
modifications, or denial of any accompanying design review application.
Town Council:
The Town Council has the authority to hear and decide appeals from any decision,
determination, or interpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission and/or
Design Review Board. The Town Council may also call up a decision of the Planning
and Environmental Commission and/or Design Review Board.
Staff:
The Town Staff facilitates the application review process. Staff reviews the submitted
application materials for completeness and general compliance with the appropriate
requirements of the Town Code. Staff also provides the Planning and Environmental
Commission a memorandum containing a description and background of the application;
an evaluation of. the application in regard to the criteria and findings outlined by the Town
Code; and a recommendation of approval, approval with modifications, or denial.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Staff believes that the following provisions of the. Vail Town Code are relevant to the
review of this proposal:
3
TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIONS
Article 12-6C: Two-Family Residential (R) District (in part)
12-6C-1: PURPOSE:
The two-family residential district is intended to provide sites for low
density single-family or two-family residential uses, together with such
public facilities as may be appropriately located in the same district. The
two-family residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air,
privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single-
family and two-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential
qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate -site development
standards.
12-tiC-6: SETBACKS:
In the R district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the
minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear
setback shall be fifteen feet (15').
12-6C-8: DENSITY CONTROL:
A. Dwelling Units: Not more than a total of fwo (2) dwelling units shall be
permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on existing
lots less than fourteen thousand (14,000) square feet.
B. Gross Residential Floor Area:
1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on
each site:
a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential floor
area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first
ten Thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus
b. Thirty eight (38) square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over
ten thousand (1 D, 000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen thousand
(15,000) square feet of site area; plus
c. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA)
for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen
thousand (15, 000) square feet, not exceeding thirty thousand
(30, 000) square feet of site area; plus
d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for
each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty
thousand (30, 000) square feet.
12-6C-9: SITE COVERAGE:
Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total sife area.
4
Chapter 12-17: Variances (in part)
12-17-1: Purpose:
A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical
difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of
this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement,
variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of
a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical
conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical
limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or
inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation
shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
VI. SITE ANALYSIS
Address: 1448 Vail Valley Drive
Legal Description: Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1
Zoning: Two-Family Residential
Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Current Land Use: Two-Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 21,045 sq. ft. (0.48 acres)
Standard Allowed/Required Existing Proposed
Setbacks (min):
Front: 20 ft. 20 ft. 17.5 ft.
Sides 15 ft. 29 ft./ 21 ft. 22 ft./ 21 ft.
Rear: 15 ft. 53 ft. no change
Height (max.): 30 ft./33 ft.
Density (max): 2 dwellings 2 dwellings no change
GRFA (max): 7,286 sq. ft. 8,801 sq. ft. 9,126 sq. ft. (+325 sq. ft.)
Site coverage (max.): 4,209 sq. ft. 3,843 sq. ft. 4,338 sq. ft. (+495 sq. ft.)
Parking (min.):
18A (West) ~ 4 4 (2 enclosed)4 (2 enclosed)
18B (East) 3 2 (1 enclosed)4 (2 enclosed)
VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Land Use Zoning
North: Residential Two-Family Residential
South: Mixed Use N/A (White River National Forest)
East: Residential Two-Family Residential
West: Residential Two-Family Residential
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12-16, Vail
Town Code.
A. Consideration of Factors Regarding Variances:
5
1.
2.
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
This proposed addition is associated with a remodel of an existing
residence originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976 with
construction completed in 1978. The applicant is proposing to construct a
garage addition that, due to the orientation of the structure to the property
line and Vail Valley Drive, encroaches 2'/2 feet into the required 20 foot
front setback. In 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission
approved a front setback variance to allow for the construction of an
additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages. This proposed
garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this
addition was never constructed. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed
setback variance for this proposed garage addition will not be detrimental
to the existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
The proposed garage, entry, and elevator additions will cause the
structure to exceed the maximum allowable site coverage for this property
by 129 sq. ft. Additionally, this existing residence currently exceeds the
allowable GRFA for this site by 1,515 sq. ft., which is 21%GRFA than is
allowed for other residences in the same zone district. The applicant is
proposing the addition of a new entry and elevator that will further
increase the non-conformity of this property. Should the Planning and
Environmental Commission choose to approve this request; the structure
will exceed the allowable GRFA by 1,840 sq. ft. This is 25% more GRFA
than is allowed for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does
not believe deviations from the GRFA regulations to this degree are in
keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the Two-Family zone
district. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance
request and site coverage request are in keeping with the bulk/mass and
general character of the neighboring properties.
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity
or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special
privilege.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition that, due to the
orientation of the structure to the property line and Vail Valley Drive,
encroaches 2'h feet into the required 20 foot front setback. In 1991, the
Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback
variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the
east of the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet
into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed.
Therefore, Staff believes the proposed setback variance is necessary to
achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the
vicinity or to attain the Town's development objectives. As the Planning
and Environmental Commission has historically approved several similar
setback variance requests, Staff does not believe approval of this request
will constitute a grant of special privilege.
6
This existing residence currently exceeds the allowable GRFA for this site
by 1,515 sq. ft.; which is 21% more GRFA than is allowed for other
residences in the same zone district. The applicant is proposing the
addition of a new entry, elevator, and bedroom that will further increase
the non-conformity of this property. Should the Planning and
Environmental Commission choose to approve this request; the structure
will exceed the allowable GRFA by 1,840 sq. ft. This is 25% more GRFA
than is allowed for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does
not believe deviations from the GRFA regulations to this degree are in
keeping with the bulk mass and general character of the Two-Family zone
district. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance
request and site coverage request associated with the proposed entry,
elevator, and bedroom are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general
character of the neighboring properties. Staff also believes approval of
the proposed GRFA .variance request and site coverage •request
associated with the proposed entry, elevator, and bedroom would be a
grant of special privilege. As this property already exceeds the maximum
allowable GRFA, so does not believe a further increase is appropriate.
The proposed garage, entry, and elevator additions will cause the
structure to exceed the. maximum allowable site coverage for this property
by 129 sq. ft. Since the proposed garage addition can be constructed
without a site coverage variance, Staff does not believe the proposed site
coverage variance is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the Town's development
objectives.
3. The effect of the requested
population, transportation
utilities, and public safety.
4
variance on light and air, distribution of
and traffic facilities, public facilities and
Staff does not believe this proposal will have a significant impact on the
public health, safety or welfare, public facilities, utilities, or light and air in
comparison to existing conditions of the site.
Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable
to the proposed variance.
On June 20, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission
reviewed the applicants' proposal to construct. a garage addition and
widen the driveway for Units 18A (Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus
construct a new entry, elevator, and bedroom addition and a new exterior
stair case for Unit 18A. This previous proposal required variances from
the setback, site coverage, and GRFA standards of the Two-Family
Residential District. The Commission was generally supportive of the
setback variance request; however, the Commission was less favorable
toward the requested GRFA and site coverage variances.. The applicant
has since amended this proposal by eliminating the proposed bedroom
and extending the. proposed elevator to all five stories.
7
B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings
before granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
IX.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Setback Variance
The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of
a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley, Drive/Lot 18,
Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This
recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this
memorandum and the.evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request
for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17,
Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth
details in regard thereto, subject to the following condition:
1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of
Vail approval of the design review application associated with this variance
request.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes
the following findings:
8
The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same district.
Site Coverage Variance
The Community Development Department recommends denial of a variance from
Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is
based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant's request for
a variance from Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17,
Variances; Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth
details in regard (hereto.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes
the following findings:
9
The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with .the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district.
Density Control Variance
r
The Community Development Department recommends denial of a variance from
Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, .Variances, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block
3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation
is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the
evidence and testimony presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass
the following motion:
The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant's
request for a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to
Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential
garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail
Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance
request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes
the following findings:
10
The Planning and Environmental Commission finds:
1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family
Residential District.
2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would not result 'in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town
Code.
b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same district.
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Amended Architectural Plans
~^
11
V j~.~r'J~~'"~ T' ,J Ir ~ (11R NEB. .L •~• \
~, .t` ~•. •rccv.e 1. ~:, .` \t~~ /~--'~ _l~
. l' ~'~ ~• ti, -~ .I~c..aL~A-•.. _ _- .rte. :~~
G. pFr •.~ i•~ ~ . a -_. •~~ I .III//
m. a y -_- 1 ':~ -~». :.i aI ''~ ~`,r•.~ mares •i~, I , hsa+c
~ +x~ ~ ^nir 'q:j i-'I'+~',.~ .~rcaf I ~~ 'asYr
,~'q .' '..I _. C'-.~kr~rJ.D
~% j ~• til' - I'r '
' ` 4 ~ ~3~ . ;.,,::s " ~ ~ Y I .~%-: •' tea.
L'iY' ; ' , .. y j., i ~ NW .IJ~;,4 ' / .6se' 1 ,!I:I. L"fi
:rl cf 0 X.'1:;,"~; kyr^-, +tT \•'~ •i•:EC•~G L 4'?.ti~'~ r;-~ ~ ,.' ~;~
,: nrfEw..:r%it;-:=~ '- "`-' ~J--a'=~-'X'.~.~ lilj<'~Ji'-=r- ~ .:
4nsr+~~~= ....:
. ` pkT+Wl, Ife ~ 1
i'
.~,~,. _
~' -
b
L~tIE~..G~~~ ~
~Y(~ {~l-ALA C'~__~ltftl
-~is~Lo'~ LJ
Uo-
a ~~'
Q N n
d
U `a LL
L
~~
~.. U
Q
E
~r
L °-
~ _ ~
v a
C
-
yr
Q .
W
~ e
°
po
30 OU
c o=
~
~
~ ~
Q J
_
LJ.
W f..
U ~
Z (~
W
~
0
W W
J
W J
Q
N ai 0
Y Q
U
O
O
m
W
= 00 V
~ J
~
~
J
N
- n , c ,_ _
uoi;ml
N
U
~ W
•a
o~
N
.v ? Q]
W 7
N
~ S
.__
..
y9.
O
+~(~~
~ - ~'I-.
if
g(7prVi6
~_.___~- ~.- 1
.'t=•:'sY(C1^ It~v ~I ~l:~:Iri::y.s~ •~ :s•F-
I
~ I 1
~ 1
_4~~~ '+Ii
~ ~~_~.4: I ~'_,~,~
__?-------
a•
I 1
'~ 1r14~ w•.~a=e~3.~~
1~, .I i~ i ~.._~._~
1. '; ; I I i
' ! t lI
t~ ' ~ t nr•I.:a.:~
1 ~ I I ~ '
~;
1
i i! ' ; ~I
i i.-
~~...:.E
iu,c~u~!
.~_.
~~I
ll' ~
'~ ~k~.
:~ ,-..~r. ~ I
~F..irN c?+k
I~r __II -..
__1_ ~,
:.,:~ .wu ~ i I I
I~
~_._.. ........_ ... _.. _s~i"
. ~ ...
.~ _.... _-'-----' - -- - ---~._..._ _~4 ~1..~'.....
.•:: ~' T
.. .. -----•-- ~ 1
C~?.~r'.(o>% Lr~C~L ;_ i•!I~iti~:Nl~l- I~o`!~L -
_,~„~~
U °~
rCi
G
S g
~ ~
m
C SA
O 'iVhi§
3 m$
°c q=
f4 n i
Z
O
r
Z
Q
W~
U ~
Z
W ~
~_
W
0 Q
J
W
V.. Q
O '
N M 0
~ Y
LPL
N O
Imo
= oo U
W
~o~
r O
N I ~
N
Slola~
WK
~' l7m
K N
U
a ~a
a~
a
a
0
g ~
m~
a~
Z
J
LL
H
N
LL
}
W
J
J
a
J
Q
M Q
Y
U
O ~
J J
m ~
0o U
~ J
0 Q
_.! ~
~ ~
~ .;
O WU
y a
{gF{ 45Q1, ~m
,{ O ¢ N
A3
,~~ F-~i~ Lr~C~~ CA~~
y~~~, o=
a +~
" aK
U
~ mLL
t
U
Q
C
d
O
O
C
N
D '..Z
v o a°
o mu
fi v>'
Z
0
~ Z
0 J
Q ~
W ~,.,
U ~
Z ~
W ~
N }
W W
~ J
J
~ Q
J ~
W J
~ Q
U ~
N ~ ~
Y
~ ~ O
w°°o
= ao" U
r
J
~ ~ ~
~$~
0
N I
;o~~
a
'~ o 'Wm
~~c ~u~i
.. L. _.:._ ...
MP.~2'f~iz o~tt(~~ ~w (~r.F~
~c~
U
a ~~
H 3°
" ^~
m
t
a`
c
n
0
S ~
c
m
c
3 ~~
~ mU
C. O y
p] d >
V
Z
J
LL
F-'
N
W
J
J.
Q
J_
M 0
Y
U
O O
J J
m 0
~ V
r
F, J
O Q
J >
-o~o~
~~~:
a~
o~
w
N~
= w~
s. O CCN
C
a ~°
m a~
=LL
a`
c
n
0
x
c
4
O ~?
a
3D m U
~IQcb
r
L~~ ~ _J
~~
L
~..._ t
-~
~--~
k
.~-$ J L.. ~ Ls.~ ~
~ ~.~ ~
~~~ . ~
_.~ _-_.
~ :.__ _.
t..---
~_ _--..
~=_==-
C__.--
wsira~ Fxx.~m4
g3~~..
pit~4 `Y
_ _ C~,~
i_ -. ,~2aT I
;°``;_1`c~t~~j;"-- ~ ~ ,~.'_i. .~-,T~ ~j ,T~ r~-,-rte ~k
W''i I~ f !~ r
T. ,
:;~i~:~e•.v .'tle'rt~;a3:N l`kC~Ck~ ~' I.~'~•~:(+ON
,.. .. -- --. ....___.._.. y, - ---- -~j-~-rDg--
r
~.~
FiLc>~
~j.._
C 0=
N ai
O
~ J
a ~,
w ~
U ~
~ ~.
W ~
N }
W LL!
~ J
J
W ~
J
0 ~
to `~ ~
Z V ~
0
z m o
a ao U
w a- -,
V/ ~ /
r c
N
~I`I
1 ~ ' ,V
a~
~! o
E y gk
Z j p}
' G K N
~`
YYY '~d~~ol
tM3T~'r
:JI.IE~3! {~
~NQryr.f:T
~~
_....~ S~T~ --
~ F1~~~'~
~... ~.;~. ra
_~ _ _._ __..._' __. _ __ ._._ _._ __ -... _.__J
1
//
_~ ~~~ '
i'~/. L I
2!!t~tb
a
m s~
r
4U
Q
N
C
n
0
c
m
c ~$
o m°~
~ a=
41 >
v
`LL
r
N~N
LJ~
W
J
J
J
Mo
U ~-
O ~
J J
m ~
0o U
~ J
1-
~ ~ '~
--, - --
n i p
r
O U
g_ a ~
~~
§ ~
z ~
' ~ ~w~
Attachment: D
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING
July 25, 2005 (Excerpt)
4. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section
12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-
17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail
Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting .forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon &
Hopkins Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Motion to approve variance for setbacks
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0-0
ACTION: Motion to approve variance for site coverage
MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 4-1-0 (Jewitt opposed)
ACTION: Motion to approve variance for GRFA
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 4-1-0 (Jewitt opposed)
Additional finding that this variance approval is for an elevator and an elevator
entry.
Bill Gibson presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum.
Pam.Hopkins and John Schofield presented the variance requests and their
reasoning for the requests.
Commissioner Jewitt was supportive of the setback variance, but not the site
coverage or GRFA variances.
Commissioner Viele agreed with the applicant that more changes are needed to
GRFA regulations, but noted that John Schofield was directly involved in the most
recent changes in the GRFA regulations. He noted his personal belief that anything
below grade should not count as GRFA.
Commissioner Bernhardt agreed that the regulations adopted by the Town Council
gave basement deductions to only the lowest level of a house. However, he believes
the applicant's proposal meets the intent of the law and is being evaluated in a site
specific situation.
Commissioner Cahill noted his concern about precedent and his support for
variances for the garage. •
1
Attachment: E
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 12-3-3, Vail Town Code, on Tuesday, September 6, 2005, at 6:00 PM in
the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:
ITEMITOPIC:
An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Planning and
Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-
6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3,
Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereib.
Appellant: ,Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon and
Hopkins Architects
Planner: •Bill Gibson
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site usits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for
additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING
,• August 22, 2005
TOiI~Of VAfI.
PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm
1. Staff memorandums were discussed with Commission members; no direction given.
MEMBERS PRESENT
David Viele
Chas Bernhardt
Doug Cahill
George Lamb
Rollie Kjesbo
Bill Jewitt
MEMBERS ABSENT
Ann Gunion
Site Visits:
1. Vail Corp. - 728 West Lionshead Circle
2. Young Residence -1452 Buffehr Creek Road
Driver: George
Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers
2:00 pm
1. A request for a worksession to discuss a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for proposed
text amendments to Title 11, Sign Regulations; Title 12, Zoning Regulations; Title 13,
Subdivision Regulations; Title .14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Town Code, for
proposed corrections and clarifications to the Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede/Bill Gibson
ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 6-0-0
Rachel Friede gave a presentation regarding the need for aclean-up text amendment to the
Town Code. She explained the three tiers of changes to occur: grammatical and spelling
changes, clarifications to the Code and policy changes. After a short review of Tier 1,
grammatical and spelling changes, PEC agreed that these changes did not need further review.
The proposed text amendments from Tier 2 and 3 will require numerous worksessions with PEC
in order to understand the proposed text amendments, as well as work out any issues related to
said amendments. Friede asked that the worksession be tabled until Sept 12 in order to begin
discussion on the specifics of Tier 2. As this is still a work in progress,, with more text
amendments to come, PEC will receive a packet of new changes one week before each meeting
in order to thoroughly review the text amendments. The Chairman expects that this process may
take 4 or 5 worksessions before the proposed text-amendments are formally introduced and a
recommendation can be made to Town Council.
2. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Sections 12-7H-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a final review of a conditional use permit,
pursuant to Section 12-7H-2, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement or Garden Level, and
12-7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor on Street Level, Vail Town Code, to allow
for the development of 106 multi-family residential dwelling units, located at 728 West Lionshead
.Circle/Lot 2, West Day Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Page 1
Applicant: Vail Corp., represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0
Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
The applicant's representative, Jay Peterson, stated that they had no formal presentation
prepared for the meeting as they agreed with this being a meeting to get everyone
understanding the review process to be used for the project.
There was no public comment.
The Commission asked several comments regarding how the recently acquired properties by
Vail Resorts (Vail Professional Building and Cascade Crossing) would affect the proposal on the
West Day Lot. Concerns included circulation if the Frontage Road was relocated ,design
changes in the building that might occur if this was to become a new portal to the ski mountain,
and concern over approving a conditional use permit for condos on the first floor adjacent to a
potential lift which might be better suited for retail. There was a request to present potential zone
districts the recently acquired properties might be rezoned to.
Jay Peterson stated that at the next meeting their presentation would include response to all the
initial questions of the Commission.
3. A request for a final revie
Subdivision, Vail Town Code,
5L, Ridge at Vail Subdivision,
regard thereto.
Applicant: Mike Young
. Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: APPROVED
MOTION: Kjesbo
w of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor
to allow fora resubdivision of Lot 1, Cliffside Subdivision and Lot
located at 1452 Buffehr Creek Road, and setting forth details in
SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0
Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
The applicant, Mike Young, had nothing to add.
There was no public comment.
The Commission expressed no concerns with the request.
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of an amendment to the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 2.8, Lionshead Redevelopment
Master Plan, to amend the boundaries of the study area to include Evergreen Lodge, located at
250 South Frontage Road West, Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 2, and setting forth details
in regard thereto.
lApplicant: Evergreen Lodge at Vail, represented by HB Development Company
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION: RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0
George Ruther gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Page 2
T.J. Brink stated that there may be some issue with sharing loading and delivery. bays due to the
hazard materials at the hospital. He also pointed out that requiring the same number of
accommodation units may be short sighted. He feels requiring the same amount of floor area
would be a better solution to maintaining of accommodation units on the site.
The Commission was favorable towards the proposed inclusion of the Evergreen site in the
Lionshead Master Plan. They were also in favor of the proposed text amendments. The
Commission discussed at length how to retain accommodation units. The Commission
suggested that a rental program should made be available to the existing condos and the future
proposed units. It was further suggested that thought should be given to designing units with
attached accommodation units. The Commission encouraged the Evergreen property owners to
work with the hospital, however, the Commissioners did not want to see the two sites tied to one
another. The Commissioners believed that the quality of units available for lodging is most
important; not necessarily the sheer number.
5. A request for a final review of a text amendment to Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-3, Amendments, to increase the height limitation for a sloping roof from
48' to 56' in the Public Accommodation zone district, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: George Ruher
ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005
MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0
6. A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7B-5, Permitted
and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for the operation of a
private club, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Remonov & Company, Inc., represented by Knight Planning Services, Inc.
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005
MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele ~ VOTE: 6-0-0
7. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12=6F-6, Setbacks, 12-6F-9, Site
Coverage, 12-6F-10, Landscaping and Site Development, 12-6F-11, Parking, pursuant to
Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 4110
Spruce Way/Lot 24, Block 8, Bighorn Addition 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Michael and Elizabeth Taggart
Planner: Matt Gennett
ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEBMER 12, 2005
MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0
8. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow fora major amendment to Special
Development District No. 22, Grand Traverse, modifying the GRFA calculations for the District;
increasing the number of lots for the District; and a final review of a minor subdivision, pursuant
to Section 13-4-2, Procedure, Vail Town Code, to modify the size of Lot 5, Amended Final Plat,
Dauphinais/Mosely Subdivision Filing 1, a resubdivision of Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, and setting
forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Grand Traverse Homeowner's Association, represented by Pat Dauphinais
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2005
MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0
Page 3
9. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow fora major amendment to Special
Development District No. 22, Grand Traverse, modifying the GRFA calculations for the district;
and a final review of a minor subdivision, pursuant to Section 13-4-2, Procedure, Vail Town
Code, to modify the sizes of Lots 4 8~ 5, Dauphinais-Mosely Subdivision Filing 1, and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Grand Traverse Homeowner's Association, represented by Pat Dauphinais
Planner:. Warren Campbell
ACTION: WITHDRAWN
10. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to
Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a new fireplace and
chimney, located at 175 Forest Road/Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1, 'and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Jack and Karen Ryan, represented by Michael Suman
Planner: Elisabeth Eckel
ACTION: WITHDRAWN
11. Approval of August 8, 2005 minutes
ACTION: APPROVED
MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0
12. Information Update
• Handout
13. Adjournment
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Lamb VOTE:.6-0-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail. Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published August 19, 2005, in the Vail Daily.
Page 4
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
August 17, 2005
~~~~ ~ 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING
PUBLIC WELCOME
PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Sherry Dorward Joe Hanlon
Pete Dunning
Lynne Fritzlen
Margaret Rogers
SITE VISITS
1. Vail Townhouse Condominiums - 303 Gore Creek Drive
2. Musson Residence - 2460 Bald Mountain Road
3. Stein Residence - 2375 Bald Mountain Road
4. Lupine Drive Duplex - 3877 Lupine Drive
5. Purchase Residence - 4418 Columbine Drive
6. 801 Timberfalls, Inc. - 4516 East Meadow Drive
7. Oberlohr Residence - 2179 St. Moritz Way
8. Weyrauch Residence - 2417 Garmisch Drive
9. Roley/Skaggs Residence -1835 West Gore Creek Drive
10. Lot 1 Forest Place - 618 Forest Place
11. Vail Spa Condominiums - 710 West Lionshead Circle
12. Montauk Seafood Grill - 549 East Lionshead Circle
Driver: George
PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. AIPP Paint Color
11:30pm
1:OOpm
3:OOpm
George
2. Vail Townhouse Condominiums DRB05-0363 Bill
Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping)
303 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 5A/Lots 4 and 5, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Family Vail Limited Partnership LP, represented by Snowdon 8~ Hopkins Architects
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 3-0-1 (Dorward recused)
CONDITIONS:
1. The applicant shall coordinate the parking area design with the Town of Vail Public Works
department to implement the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan. The applicant shall submit
revised plans to the Town of Vail, for review and approval, with the building permit revision
application.
Page 1
3. Garel/Marston Residence DRB05-0338 ~ 1 Warren
Final review of a minor alteration (exterior changes)
2668 and 2670 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 13, Vail Village Filing 13
Applicant: Scott Garel and Charlie Marston, represented by Pinyon Builders, Inc.
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 40-0
4. Vail Spa Condominiums DR605-0091 Elisabeth
Final review of a minor alteration (repaint)
710 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3
Applicant: Vail Spa Condominiums Homeowners Association
ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0
5. Oberlohr Residence DRB05-0366 _ Bill
Final review of new construction (single-family residence)
2179 St. Moritz Way/Lot 6, Vail Heights Filing 1
Applicant: Konrad and Monika Oberlohr, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC
ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005
MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0
6. Weyrauch Residence DRB05-0367 Bill
Final review of new construction (primary/secondary residence)
2417 Garmisch Drive/Lot 14, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing 2
Applicant: Shawn Weyrauch, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC
ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005
MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 4-0-0
7. Stein Residence DRB05-0369 Matt
Final review of a residential addition (elevator, deck; windows)
2375 Bald Mountain Road, Unit A/Lot 24, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13
Applicant: Kenneth Stein and Karen Day, represented by TRD Architects
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0
8. Purchase Residence DRB05-0372 Elisabeth
Conceptual review of new construction (primary/secondary residence)
4418 Columbine Drive/Lot 3, Bighorn Subdivision Addition 3
Applicant: John Purchase, represented by Steve Riden
Conceptual review; no vote
9. Lot 1 Forest Place DR605-0373 Bill
Final review of new construction (single-family residence)
618 Forest Place/Lot 1, Forest Place Subdivision
Applicant: Glendore Development, represented by Larry Deckard
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0
1. The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan such that retaining walls within the
front setback do not exceed three feet (3') in height.
Page 2
10. Musson Residence DRB05-0298 Elisabeth
Conceptual review of a residential addition (master suite addition)
2460 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 20, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13
Applicant: Paul and Elisa Musson, represented by Mosaic Architects
Conceptual review; no vote
11. Roley/Skaggs Residence DRB05-0390 Warren
Final review of a minor alteration (deck)
1835 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 20, Vail Village West Filing 2
Applicant: Kevin Roley and Kate Skaggs
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0
12. Vail Dover Associates, LLC DRB05-0376 George
Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping)
One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision
Applicant: Vail Dover Associates, LLC, represented by Resort Design Associates
ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005
MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning VOTE:4-0-0
13. JEC Residence DR605-0302 Elisabeth
Final review of new construction (single-family residence)
1386 Buffehr :Creek Road/Lot G-2, Briar Patch Subdivision
Applicant: Kemil Rizk, represented by Zehren & Associates
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 40-0
CONDITION(S):
1. The application shall be approved, with the exception of the landscaping plan, which shall
return to the Design Review Board for review on September 7, 2005.
14.801 Timberfalls, Inca DRB05-0380 Elisabeth
Final review of a residential addition (windows)
4516 East Meadow Drive/Lots 6 and 7, Timbertalls Condominiums
Applicant: Haller Construction
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 4-0-0
15. Lionshead Core Site Hotel DRB04-0305 George
Final review of a major exterior alteration (public art, signs, outdoor lighting)
675 Lionshead Place/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail
Community Development Department upon request).
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 4-0-0
CONDITION(S): Approved per plans dated 8/17/05.
16. Montauk Seafood Grill Deck DRB05-0411 George
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
549 East Lionshead Circle/Lifthouse Condominiums
Applicant: Bob and Diane Lazier, represented by Tom Ludwig
ACTION: Tabled to September 12, 2005
Page 3
MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 40-0
CONDITION(S):
Staff Approvals
Holden Residence DRB05-0247
Final review of a minor alteration (deck)
1350 Sandstone Drive/Lot G3, Lion's Ridge Subdivision
Applicant: Barbara Holden, represented by Ron Kitchell
Kendrick Residence DRB05-0342
Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping)
2975 Manns Ranch Road/Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 13
Applicant: Clinton and Mary Kendrick, represented by Beck Building, Co.
Burrows Residence DRB05-0377
Final review of a minor alteration (hot tub)
1370 Sandstone Road, Unit 11/Lot 11, Eiger Chalets
Applicant: Aaron Burrows; represented by Maximum Comfort Pool & Spa
Snownow, LLC DRB05-0394
Final review of change to approve plans (entry, deck, windows)
2398 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Vail das Schone Filing 2
Applicant: Erik and Heather Priebe
Pitkin Creek Condominiums DRB05-0349
Final review of a minor alteration (stairs)
4041 Bighorn Road,'Unit 10E/Pitkin Creek Park
Applicant: Pitkin Creek Condominium Association, represented by Rob Steinke
Dorner/Headley Residence DRB05-0387
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
1424 and 1426 Moraine Drive/Lot 12, Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision
Applicant: Wolfgang Domer, represented by Thomas Headley
Village Inn Condominiums DRB05-0281
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
100 East Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Village Inn Condominium Association, represented by Red Eagle Construction
Jeranko Residence DRB05-0389
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
2650 Bald Mountain Road, Unit A/Lot 30, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13
Applicant: Stanley and Karen Jeranko, represented by Plath Construction, Inc.
Laidlaw Residence DR605-0374
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
1724 Geneva Drive/Lot 10, Block O/Matterhorn Village Filing 1
Applicant: Walt Laidlaw ~ .
Bill
Bill
Bill
Bill
Elisabeth
Bill
Bill
George
George
Page 4
Prochnow Residence DRB05-0383
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof and repaint)
483 Gore Creek Drive/Lot 7, Vail Village Filing 4'
Applicant: Christopher and Ann Prochnow
Komppa Residence DRB05-0382
Final review of a minor alteration (siding)
4846 Juniper Lane/Lot 2, Block 5, Bighorn 5th Addition
Applicant: Mike Komppa, represented by Kisker Construction, Ltd.
Middle Creek Village DRB05-0407
Final review of change to approved plans (handrails)
129 North Frontage Road/Mountain Bell
Applicant: Coughlin & Company, represented by Odell Architects
Koelbel Residence DRB05-0354
Final review of a residential addition (living room and bedroom additions)
1476 Westhaven Drive, Unit 40/Lot 53, Coldstream Condominiums
Applicant: Sherrill S. Koelbel, represented by Aker Architects
Kaufman Residence DR605-0355
Final review of a residential addition (living room and bedroom additions)
1476 Westhaven Drive, Unit 39/Lot 53, Coldstream Condominiums
Applicant: James M. Kaufman, represented by Aker Architects
Erdington Residence DR605-0321
Final review of a minor alteration (siding and deck)
1350 Sandstone Drive, Unit 1/Lot 6-3, Eiger Chalets
Applicant: Donald Erdington, represented by Eric Rohwetter
Conners/Parker Residence DRB05-0408
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
2427 Garmisch Drive, Units 13A and B/Lot 13A, Block H/Lot 21, Block A,
Applicant: Thomas Conners, represented by Master Sealers
Nesbitt Residence DR605-0395
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
4352 Spruce Way, Unit #4/Bighorn Subdivision 3~d Addition
Applicant: John Nesbitt, represented by Plath Construction, Inc.
Baltz Residence DR605-0385
Final review of change to approved plans (windows)
3786 Lupine Drive/Lot 6, Bighorn 2"d Addition
Applicant: Steve and Marty Baltz
Ogilby Residence DRB05-0384
Filial review of change to approved plans (site plan)
2883 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Vail Intermountain Subdivision
Applicant: Chuck Ogilby, represented by George Sink
Matt
George
Matt
Bill
Bill
Bill
Joe
Vail das Schone Filing 1
Joe
Warren
Bill
Page 5
Carnie Residence DR605-0397
Final review of a minor alteration (deck)
2603 Cortina Lane, Lot 1, Block A, Vail Ridge Filing 2
Applicant: Jack and Joan Carnie
Carnie Residence DRB05-0396
Final review of a minor alteration (driveway)
2603 Cortina Lane/Lot 1, Block A, Vail Ridge Filing 2
Applicant: Jack and Joan Carnie
Goss Residence DR605-0409
Final approval of a minor alteration (windows)
174 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Lodge Apartment Condominiums
Applicant: Howard Goss, represented by Rzepiejewski & Company
Michel Residence DR605-0402
Final review of a minor alteration (skylights)
2743 Kinnikinnick Road, Unit A6/Meadow Creek Subdivision
Applicant: Theresa Michel, represented by Highland Builders Corporation
Price Residence DRB05-0403
Final review of a minor alteration (skylights)
2733 Kinnikinnick Road, Unit C3/Meadow Creek Subdivision
Applicant: Heather Price, represented by Highland Builders Corporation
Wisenbaker Residence DRB05-0406
Final review of a minor alteration (repaint and re-roof)
153 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 37, Block 7,m Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Michael Wisenbaker
Halpert Residence DRB05-0386
Final review of change to approved. plans (bedroom addition, stairs, entry)
1054 Homestake Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 8)
Applicant: Michael Halpert, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
Booth Creek Townhomes DRB05-0404
Final review of change to approved plans (mailbox canopy)
2875 Manns Ranch Road/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 13
Applicant: Booth Creek Townhome Association, represented by TRD Architects
Millrace Condominium Association DRB05-0398
Final review of a minor alteration (stairs)
1320 Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village
Applicant: Millrace Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects
McGlynn/Soden and Haggerty Residence DRB05-0365
Final review of a minor alteration (deck, repaint, driveway, retaining wall and re-roof)
5128 Grouse Lane/Lot 8, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision
Applicant: Catherine Haggerty and Ethel McGlynn
Warren
Warren
Joe
Bill
Bill
Warren
Bill
Elisabeth
Elisabeth
Warren
Page 6
Town of Vail DR605-0414
Final review of a minor alteration (radio tower antenna)
75 South Frontage Road/unplatted
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Paul Smith
Staff Denied
Bus Stop Pizza DRB05-0392
Final review of a sign
1000 Lion's Ridge Loop/Lot 11, Lion's Ridge Filing 1
Applicant: Vail Run Commercial Ventures
Withdrawn
White Rock Properties, LLC DRB05-0379
Final review of change to approved plans (retaining walls)
1239 Westhaven Circle/Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6
Applicant: Alan Goncharoff, represented by William Restock
Dimond Residence DRB05-0271
Final review of a minor alteration (windows)
917 Red Sandstone Circle, Unit 4C/Sandstone 70 Subdivision
Applicant: Nancy Dimond
O'Neil Residence DR605-0241
Final review of a minor alteration (repaint)
1385 Westhaven Circle/Lot 51, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Applicant: Patricia O'Neill
Warren
Bill
Bill
Bill
Matt
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the
project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the
Hearing Impaired, for information.
Page 7
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Stan Zemler, Pam Brandmeyer, Greg Hall, Judy Camp, Gina Davis
DATE: September 6, 2005
SUBJECT: Long-Term Capital Analysis, 2005-2020
1. INTRODUCTION
As part of the 2006 budget process, Town Council has requested a discussion of
long-term capital needs. In particular, Council has inquired about the following:
• What assets do we have today and what is their condition?
• What are our priorities?
• What are our priorities after redevelopment?
• What will the priorities be for the next 15 years?
Following an overview of the town's asset management philosophy, we are
prepared to review long-range projections for available revenue for capital
purposes, plus expenditures associated with capital maintenance, capital
replacement, debt service and financing, and available funds for new projects.
II. ASSET MANAGEMENT
The Town of Vail is responsible for the long term care and maintenance of its
assets. These assets have a replacement cost valued at $325 million, excluding
land values, with another $20 million managed by the Vai! Recreation District.
These assets include infrastructure such as streets, bridges, storm sewers, street
lighting, signs, bridges and recreation paths. The town also has significant assets
in buildings, parking structures, and other facilities such as bus stops, park
restrooms, playgrounds, street furniture, planters, fountains, and public art. In
addition, the town is responsible for many systems, such as security, computer
software and hardware, communications, snowmelt, and irrigation. An extensive
fleet of vehicles, buses, and equipment is also cared for. In addition, the town
manages its open space lands as well as other parcels.
Taking care of the town's existing assets has been an important budgetary
responsibility. For example, managers in the Public Works Department are
responsible for evaluating short-and long-term needs associated with facilities,
transit & parking, streets 8~ bridges, parks, buses, vehicles, and other equipment.
These managers recommend schedules for routine and preventive maintenance
for inclusion in the capital budget, and, when appropriate, make
recommendations for replacement. Attachments are included as examples of the
documentation processes used to care for the town's assets and the rationale
used to manage the assets.
III. WHAT ARE OUR PRIORITIES?
Assuming the town's practice of taking care of its existing assets is a desirable
priority action to continue into the future, staff has calculated the costs associated
with basic levels of capital maintenance and capital_replacement over the next 15
1
.years.. Similarly, projected revenues .available for capital purposes have been
calculated. The results show that over the 15-year horizon, approximately 66%
of the total available capital dollars are allocated for maintenance, replacement,
or debt service on existing assets, leaving approximately 34% for discretionary
projects. Discretionary projects are best described as initiatives that create new
assets or enhance existing assets. Examples of discretionary projects include
Village Streetscape, Donovan Pavilion and the West Vail fire station. Current
projections show limited dollars available for discretionary projects in the Capital
Projects Fund in the near-term, with more discretionary opportunities beginning
in 2012. In reviewing the Real Estate Transfer Tax fund, there are opportunities
for more discretionary spending occurring more consistently during the 15-year
period, while the capital fund experiences greater fluctuation in these
discretionary dollars.
It should be noted that the asset management projections place an emphasis on
maintenance and repairs to town-owned buildings, rather than replacement. The
projections also show an investment in neighborhood street reconstruction during
the years 2009-2011, which has been deferred since 2002 to make way for the
Village Streetscape project, which was timed to coincide with replacement of
aging water and sewer lines bythe Eagle River Water & Sanitation District.
IV. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 8~ QUESTIONS .
As Council begins to set the agenda for along-term capital strategy, the
information provided in this document provides a framework for discussion of
several .key findings and questions associated with this preliminary work:
• Is the town's prescribed maintenance schedule sustainable over time?
• As the town adds discretionary projects, what new demands will be
placed on the capital maintenance fund as well as the general fund
(heated streets, flowers, staffing, etc.)?
• Is the 60-40 split in allocating sales tax collections between the General
Fund and Capital Projects Fund sustainable in the future?
• How should RETT discretionary dollars be used?
• How should Capital Fund discretionary dollars be used?
• What criteria should be used to evaluate new projects?
• Town debt obligations end in 2012; should the town prepare to take on
new debt in 2013 for building replacement, other needs?
• How will the town be more attentive to managing the maintenance and
replacement of assets operated by third parties, such as the Vail
Recreation District?
2
~~ ~
~~
Capital Assest Value
Bridges Year Built Length Width Rating SO FT Repalcement
Bighom @ Pitkin 1989 23 42.5 90.6 977.5 $488,750
Black Gore Drive 1988 30 24 76.4 720 $360,000
Bridge Road 1979 38 34 B6 1326 $663,000
Forest Road 1988 128 35 95.7 4480 $2,240,000
Gore Creek Drive 1990 45 38.75 99.9 1743.75 $871,875
Kinicinick East 1980 61.33 30 89.7 1839.9 $919,950
Kinicinick west 1983 52 32 83 1664 $832,000
Lupine Road 1881 51.5 28 96.7 1442 $721,000
Main Gore Drive 1975 41 30 96 1230 $615,000
Matterhorn 1870 38.5 24.25 40.2 933.625 $466,813
Meadow Drive 1975 41.2 30 90.9 1236 $618,000
Nugget Lane 1981 41 14.25 68.6 584.25 $292,125
Vail Road 1995 64 43.33 79.7 2773.12 $1,386,560
Vail Valley Drive West 1986 42 45 77.7 1880 $945,000
Vail Valley Drive East 1985 61.5 46.5 97.6 2859.75 $1,429,875
Westhaven 1979 96 28.33 69.4 2719.68 $1,359,840
Willow bridge Road 1992 51 45 96 2295 $1,147,500
$15,357,288
Major Draninage Structures @ roadways
Big Horn ~ Columbine
Bigorn (d Spruce
Bighorn ~ Bighorn Rd
Booth Creek ~ Booth Creek Dr
Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir
Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir
Mill Creek @ Vail Valley Drive
Mill Creek @ Hanson Ranck
Mill Creek @ Gore Creek Drive
Spraddle Creek System
Middle Creek Frontage
Middle Creek Frontage
Middle Creek Meadow Drive
Red Sandstorn @ Vail View Drive
Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage
Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage
Buffher Creek ~ Circle
Buffher Creek ~ Chamonix
Buffher Creek ~ Frontaage
Buffher Creek ~ Frontaage
Major Draninage Structures ~ Trails
Booth Creeek
Mill Creek
Middle Creek
Middle Creek
Red Sandstone
Buffeher Creek
Buffher Creek
Deer Underpass
Roadways( 32.4) miles
Lineal Feet rated 90-100
Lineal Feet rated 80-90
Lineal Feet rated 70-80
Lineal Feet rated 60-70
Lineal Feet rated 50-60
Lineal Feet rated 40-50
Lineal Feetrated 30-40
Lineal Feet rated 20-30
Lineal Feet rated 10-20
Lineal Feetrated 0-10
Lineal Feet rated poor or fair
E Vail Rds to reconst
Golf Crse Rds to reconst
Value of roadway assest
Recreation Paths
_Recreation Path(14.7) mile:
Recreation Path bridges
Parks
Playgrounds(9)
New (6)
Older(3)
Picnic shelters
Public Art
Other
Street Llghts
Streetscape
Snowmeit System
Specieman Trees
Lineal Feet
10618
68362
38888
20263
10318
7497
5351
2856
216
2847
167426
23010
10112
Percent
8.3%
40.8%
23.3%
12.1%
6.2%
4.5%
3.2%
1.7%
0.1
1.8%
17.4% Less than 60
13.7%
6.0%
32.4 5280 171072
14.7 5280 77616
18
6
3
6
31
1385
300000
350000
100
Vehicles,
Systems
Computers
Radio Equipment
Parking Systems
Electomic Signs
Furniture and Fixtures
Parkng Lots 500
Building Assets from Building Master Plan
VRD Managed Assets
Toatai Asset Value
350 175000
275
150
250000
350000
250000
varies
.2500
60
35
20000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150, 000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$3,000,000
$65,000
$65,000
$65,000
$65,000
$65,000
$65,000
$65,000
$65,000
$520,000
$47,044,800
$11,642,400
$4,500,000
$2,100,000
$750,000
$2,850,000
$300,000
$1,310,000
$3,462, 500
$18,000,000
$12,250,000
$30,250,000
$2,000,000
$17,241,290
$3,500,000
$2,500,000
$950,000
$250,000
$2,500,000
$875,000
$175,000,000
$20,000,000
$345,053,278
\-
TOWN OF VAIL BUILDINGS MASTER PLAN SUMMARY 2005 i i
_ - ~
-- I '__- __ _ _ __ _ „__ ~ - _-_ !_ _-_ __-__ _ __ , , _ __._ _
- - , I __ ~ _ ~ ~ - -- -
' ------~
Asset DateBuiR ~
' SizeSF { LifeCycfe CurrentVafue Maintenance_ MalorUpgrade + Yearofremodel i Remodel cost-
--- -- - .
' ------- - Replacement j
-- Yearlnidal
---- Replacement cost ~Yearreplacement -
- - --- --- Replacement cost
-
- - -
- ---
-
-- - -
-
~
~
, Cast perYear Remodel Cast i
3l41iTe
( ) j year of remodel
-
Toda_y's Cost I Replacement due
year of replacement after remodel (1f3 more)
;year of revised 1l3 more
Bus Shelters (15) 1991-1999 I 100 ea 30 r i _ 5247 000 .1 $11,000 _ _ $132,000 , 20142022 ~ $342,396 $280,000 2020 -2029 $1,045 368 12030-2039 $1 702,794
Community Development 1967 _' _ 7 000
- -
- 40 yr -
^ $1550 000 -
---
- $38,000 _ $930,000
~ 1997 -_- - $728,619 _ $2,750,000 2007 _ - - - -- - $3,509 774 1, ---- _, 2012: -- - ---- --
- $4,479,460
Donovan Pawhon
_ _' -
Fire Stationll(MainValq 1
I- _2000
_1971 _j
~
_
7150
40yr
35yr
_
$1,600,0001
1 __-_
~
$33,0001 _
- $470,000' T--
_2001 , -
2003 ' -
$447619
40
5 1 _
_$1,970,000 -- _2040
_ _
2006
2010 _ _ I _
_~ _
_ $2,394547- _--
0241141
$2 - --- .
2018;_
2020 _-. _ _.
$4,300,263
068
$3
297
FireStaVOnl(EastVaiq
_- -._ 1980 ~
;- - 7500
- !
~ 30yr _
., --$1,650000
i- $28,000
---
I $385,000
~--_ $
42
0
_ .
- -_$1,370,000!,--
---- -
- -- _--
.
i
-- - ; -
- ,
,
- -
Fountains
----- '
-~-----I
------ ~
-
_ ..
__.. -- ---- --
~~
~
--- ~--- L
---.i __.-
!
__ r.. -' --
~ ----- - --- ---- -- -- --- - - - ---- -
Children's
_ _
Slifer ~ -- --
i
J
~- - -
-
~ --
' ~
--
---
-
- ~
---- j --
t
_ 1-.-
------
- -{I-
--
1 -
----
-
-- ---- - --
-- ~ -----
_ -
j
~ - -- ---- I - --
~ ~
_ - -----
,
_ :_ --
,- - -
1
i ~ I i ~ ~
WallSfreet
- i ~-- ~- i --- - --- -
--
I I __ _ __ __
_ ___ _ __ ___ ____ _
Mayors
Gereld Ford Am hitheater
P ~~
1987 8 2001 ~
50 yr
I _ i _
I
- I
_
By WF
~
_
_ -_~
I, _
-
_
;
-
-L
---
2037 -2051
--- --
-- I
------ - _--------- --------
i - - _ -
$0
Housing ---- -ii---
- ---
--- -
--^
1
-
--- -----
-- - ---
I I
-- T i
-
~--
- '
~
~ I __ ~~ -
- --- - - SO
Buzzard Park (24) ,
-- 1996 I
-~ 13,500 r
-~--- 30 yr
- r
$2,386,000
-- ~ $48,000 j _
----- $7,840,000 2019
--- $17 969,424.
-
- $2 750,000 ',_
--- ---
I 2026 _ T
-
s 58,869,025 ,
------- ~ -- 2036
- -- t---- --- $14,446,707
- ----
_Creekside(16)
_ _~
`
S.l_00
20yr
30 _
~
$211
500
$40.000
___ _
$7600 5440,1100
_
$44
000 I
___j_--
-
- ~
-- _
- _ _ __ ~
I --
- ~
-' - -- $0
SO
-
Vail Das Schone (1) -
1
- _
1,100 ~-- yr ,
_
_ ,
_
_
- _
r __ __
^
~~
-- _
- i ,
_ _
VaflHeightsll)
~
~
750
30yr
$144,250 _-
- $7,500_
_ $49,
500
~-._- -
_ -... -
_
I
--- - - -1-
---
~ _
~ ___
~__--
_ _
_ SO
-
__
Innsbruck (11 _
Managers Residence _ _
___ I
T 1979
3,100
~
25yr
~
5812,500
~
'
$10,500
$170,000
1998 '
$139,859 i
-
$550,000 ~
I
2003
'
'
~ -
I
--
~
2011]
_
-----
-
~
-----
~
Library --'--
1883
~ r---
17400 -
I -
40
1'r --
$3,820,000
- --- $60,000
~- _
$990,000 2011 ~--
~ _
`-
51,5
3.5,815 _
-- T-
$4900,000; -- -
2023 ,i
-
~
- - ---
^-_ $20,500,0001 - --_... r
__2~`
----i---------- 525,200,000
--
_
Lionshea ~ tans o9 Von
P
.
-----
Auxilia Buildin _
1980
~
---
1980
1
~
-
--
-
~ _
-
50
- --
40~
y __
'
542,240,000
-------
-- t $460,000
I-_
104000
~ '
51,650,000
-~--~
---
-
_ _
~,
0'00
- --
-- _
_
_
52,437,801
'
-- ---~-
------~1
$56,500,000
----~1-~
------- I-
2030
-----
-- -~ --
1
$221,487,296 ' ____ _
- -----_ _
-_---$~
- ---- i 2033:,
------• ----------
2033;
_ $256,399,231.
----
_ $0 ~
ColoradoWesl --
--- -
I 1980 1,350 y
- --
30 r _~ __
-
I $121,000 i
__ ~ ---
2010 -
;
~ ~ 2010
-_- ~ --- ~ _
2033_- _ $0 j
Information Cenler -
-
Moved in 1990
~ 20 yr - 582,000 -- - -
--
- 2005
- -. $D ;
- - --~- 2010
I- $0
----- --
--- 2017]
-- `-
---- - $0 ,
-
--- -- ---
Misc. Buildings and Sheds -
Varies -
--_ _- _ _ __ _ --T
-__ _$275,000
~ $30,~ _
- 862,000
~ 1997 _
~ $fi4,249 -$330 000 _ 1 _
_ $0 _ _
_ $0~
___
Munidpal Budd_mg
ParkRestroomsQ) - --,--- -
1967
--I----- 11,425
- Vary C
r - 40 yr
-
25yr - ~ $3,D0000
$200,000 $44,000 r _
$31,000 51400000 -
~
$77,000 1997 -
~ -- $1096,937
$0 $3,850,0011 ~-
$220 ODO i 2007 ~
i __
` $4913,684 -
$0
- 2020---
' $9,265,484 a
$0
-- -
PoliceDe artment
P --- --
-- -
j
1992
-~
--~ _
31,325
` -- ~
-- y
35 r
- - --
56350_0001 _ -
_ $38,000 -
582,500 ~ --.
2018 ,
$180,087
- -.. __ -~-
$6,600,000
J .
-
2027
--
-
-
-I
- -- ---- --
-
-_ $22,349,943
---
2039',
_. - --
$40,137,2 6
-
Public Works
---- -- - - --
Admin Building
-
~----
i 1998
.
~
L-- -
5,075
~_.------
~-
------
- I
-
---- L-------
$1 115,000
35y-`'
$60,000
i
-
$82,500
-
_ _ __
i
- i
2022
SO ~
--
5216897
---t---- -
$2470,000 2031
$0
-
~ - - -
$10166855.
_ __
_
-_ _
2043-
__ __
$0
$18,258,211
-
--
BusBamlWash -
1996 j 33,250 ~ 30yr ~- $2,272,0001 ~
-- - $275,000
-- 2019 _ _$630305 $3150000 _
2026 _ -- $1D,159065~
-- 2036- $16,548,046
--
_ _ __ _ _
Shop __
VailTmnsporta6_onCU.
_-
SkiMuseum _
-~ 1980
197_481990
1990 _
24,5_00 _
1 30yr
I 50 yr
i
35 r
y $3,750,500 _ _ I _
_ $69,850,000 $365000
~- --}--
I _
_ $605,000 2003
~
121,200,000 2010
---~--i---
_ I _ _
$635250 $5150000 ~ _-
-- - ' - -1 2010
$179,067,600 $77,000,000 2024.2030
----; -_
-t-_---
$0. 2025
- -i- ---- - _ _ $_7,608896 _ _ _
' ~ $301,849,944
--- -- r--- -
+- ...-- - -~ ----- - -- 2020 _ _
2043; __ _
20387-
~ $12,394089
$56.9,183,087_
-
_
--- -.
Center
I
f
6 -._-
1990 -- ----
l 35yr -- --
r _
_
1 ~ 2116 ~ $0 i 2025 1 ~ 2038,
n
orma
on
Termmal Building
i 1995
- i
35yr _ -_ ~
-
-
; j --- 1- -
-
'
- 2021 ~---
--- i .--- -
-- - .- $D ,
~---
2030 - _
~ - _-
_
^------- I _
-
2042' _ - -
I ~ Totals i $143,080,000 I $962,300. $136,969,5001 $169,8400001 1
A
~'a
VAIL RECREATION DISTRICTASSETS 2005 I
------ ~-
,
~
I i
~ ,
, ! I '.
~ ! I
_ _____
I I - - -
- ~
---
i -` - -~---
i ---
-----j
I -
~ ----
_
---
Asset
-- Date Built
! -I SizeSF
---- Life Cycle
- CumentValue I Maintenance I Major Upgrade I Yew ar of remodel ~
Remodel cost
-
- Rep acl ement ;- Year Iniflal Replacement cast !Year replacement _
- - ;Replacement cost
-- -
--_ .
~_, I ~ -~ Cost per Year Remodel Cast ! (3141'de) _
year of remodel _
Today's Cost ;Replacement due C year of replacement ',after remodel j113 more]- _ year of revised 113 more
I ' I _ r I I !
-
__
- -
~,--
------'
---
-
'' ~ _
_
- i ~
----
~
I
I I
~~
---~
-_
. -
I
-
Ford Park
I
~ i - r' i '
f
~-~ - ~
--- _ i -_ - .
Resrrooms/Ccncessions 1983 1,004 25 yr J $ 250,000.00 I $75,000 ~ 2002 ! $150,000 $ 300,000.00 2008 $347,287
--
-
ImgationSystem 1990 ~ 20yr j _ _~ _ __~-
- ~
--- --L _
- -
- --
- ~
-
Fencing ! 1992 j 2,697__!
_ 15
yr ; $ 26,970.00',
-.
------- - 2003
i $13,485
$14,868
_
_y$
53,940.OD, 2007 ~
~
$59,469 _~
-
_.-.-- _
--- -
Storege Farelity 1990 I 600 25 yr --I $ 30,000.001 _ _ __' $ 105,000.00 ! _'_-~ ! ___ _- _ -_--_ - ___
Bleachers , 1992- i- ---,
- ; I
. i I !
I h- --
--- - - _
~ !
- ~ __
_ - -
GoIF Course
-
~ I --I -- -~ .
----- $0
-
ClubHouse I
-
1975-1987 --~-----
6,000 !
- -- ~
30yr ~- ---
$ 1,700,000.00;
- -
$2,000 ~ 1987
--
--~
- -
i ___
_,$
7,000,000.00, 2D05
$7,000,000
- - --
------ _
-
T-
-- - -
$0
Cart Bam
_ _ ~ 1967 _
! _7,200 _
( 30
yr ($ 720,OOD.OO I
___
- r
T
I $185,000 newra
~ 2009
-
-
-- $224_b68 $ 1,260,000.00! 2017 ~
V !
-
-
-- ~
---
-
Maintenance Shop
---
- 1975-1998 I
-
- 8,000 i
--- 30y
r , $ 1,200,000.001 .
- -
--
--'
- ~~ _ _
-
i, _
_ $ 2,000,000.001
2006 -- J - ~ $0
tartefsShack
-
1987 j
--- --
-
,
1,60D ,
------ -
_-
_
30yr
- -
-*-
-
-
_~ $ 280,000.00;
- ----1---
i I
--- - _
--
_ __--
$
480,000.00 --- ~
~~ _
-----_
-L
Caurse Restroom #6 1991 r 1,755 yr
25 ! $ 202
125.001 -
$ 347
000.00
_CaurseRestroom#12
_
1987 1
_ _
____
200 I -
_
-
25 yr _
,
,r$ 240,000,W
I
~ ___
-
$
-= __ _~
,
60,000.00 -
~
!
_Retainin _Wall#3 _
_
g _
1994
__
~ __
1,112_-_-_-
-
_-~ -
-20 --
I ' _ _
I
~ -
I $ __
55,000.00
T- I _ ----- --r--
Retainin
Wali#1 _
9
Retaining Wall #15
1994
--
_ I
--1-
I 2001 l
920
--
I
- ---- -
1750 i
20
-~-
----
20 yr
i ---- I__,
----- --- 7
r _ _
____
_ _
_ _ --- --
~
~ _
_
-I
S
~
I-'.~
75_000;
I
---
-
_
_
--
---
-r_ _
Bridge #1
~ _
-1992 I -
14' x 13' I _ _
--' $ 100
000.00-
- - ~-- - _
_ _-__ __
I _ V _-
~ -- _
~ _
_
_
- ^ _
~
_
Bridge#2
_
992 ~ _
12 x13 _~_ _
~ $_ 90,000001 _
- -~ -- -_~-
-
~--- -
-
- -
-+_
- -
~ -~-_-_ _-_
-~-
- _ _-
_
- - -
-- _ -
_- }
- ~ -
Bnd a #11 small _
9 1992 ~
i 20
x
8'
~
! $ 100 DOD,00
I
~
~
'i
~ _ _
Bndge #11 walking _ ___
_ 1989_ ~ _
_
_
40 z 16 ~ _
_ I $ 250000 0~ i ~ -
--
L _- - __-_ ^ _
I _
~ _
--_- - --. __
-- ~ --
bridge#14 1975 ' 45 x 11 ~ $ 20000D,OO _
_
_
!
~
i --
I ! _ -_
~ _ _
_ . ~
-- -
Bridge#15 -
_ _ _ -
---
1975 ?-
--; .
45x11
------,--
---
$ 200,000,001
-~----y - -
-
-----1- _ I _ ~
~
-~'- ~----
---
~~ - ---
T 1 I
----~----
- -_- __-
~ - - - --- _ _
_-__-
I
8ridge #17 1968 I
_-...._ 40' x 10'
..----- j $ 200,000.00 i
------'---- I I
--~--------1- ~
1-_-----'- ~
--j ~ ~
____ _---~- - - -'-- ----- --'-~-------- ---
Lightning Shelter#1 _1970 625_
- _ 20 yr -I $ _ 5,000.00'
~-- -
---- I J~
------
--
- ~----....----
- I
--'--- I
-' ---
----
----------
-- -1- -
_ Lighting Shelter #5 __1970 ! 625
I 20 yr I $
3,000.00 ! ~
I L ~
-Cart Paths__
Im
ti
t
S _
1998-2 0 25,2841inear ftl
!
--~-~-
10 yr
- _
r $ 250,000.00 j - -
-~
-~-----
---
--- - _ _ __-
I
-T_------ '-
T- --
-_
_
- -
_ i ---v-
--
----
-_-_-_----
T
-
- --
___
~
ga
on
ys
em
- 1970.1986
_
-- 20yr
~---'---^--
~
-
-
-~- '
-----
-
- ~
--
---
- !
Driving Range
-- .1994 ' -
- --
..
- -- 20 ~ i ~
--
- --~---- ~-- ----
( ~ t -
ll . -
_~
~ ~ (
- --
----
~ -
L ----T----
i __ --.
I
Dobson Ic
e Arena ~
B
ildi
~
-
1979
2
~ 5
00
t i~
-----'----_---
'--}------
?-
-
-
~-~----
--;
r--------
--
--- ~
----
-
~
_ __
-
_ _
,
-~-~
---_---
-
g
_u
n _
-
001
_ ~
3
,0
i
^ --yr
50 -~__--_
$ 8,750,000.00 __
$4,375,000
2017
- $ 1 _
QSOO,DOO.OD1_ 2029 $39,201,291 _
_ _ _ _
_
_ i
- Refrigeration System 1979-2000 I_- 16,000
' - ~ --_--- ~
-_ -_
~_
- I
- i-
- ~ --~,-- ---
- _
- -------- _
-----L-- ---
GymnasticsCente~
--- 2004~- 9_000 I,I
- -40yr ..
S 1_700,000.001
- --
- --
I
, $850,000 I 2034
----r•
-- ----.-
-~---
--- I
-~- -
- r-- -
-
---
~
-
_- ~_ $0
I
N
t
C
t
r---- -----
197
-- - ---L
~ I
1 -
0 r
----
~ _ _
$
j--- --'
~
-- _
-
--j"`
-
a
ure
en
er 5 !
r
' - _1,400
_ 20 yr $ 245,000.0
1
j--r- $122,500_!
---r--
I
~
I
I 300,000.00 }
~~ _
-
------
~j
TenniaCenter __
B
i
i
t --- - -
~`
'
i -----
3 --
--
---~--~---- --
------
~---_-~ -
~
j -_~
- -
{-
~~---
~
_
u
ld
ng
Tennis Coun4 1991
1995
_ r
'
..-~
-- 3,250 _
I
53,482 -~_
-- 30yr
20 yr $ 98
750_ i
$ 3D0,000.00'-_ -
- $1,500 _ $446,875 2013
'~
$6,D00 $150,000 2010 _ - _
-
j
-~'-
~ - -_
- -
-~
- __- ___ --,
____L- _
--
Pavedwalkway !
~
1991
625 ~
15yr
r
-
$ 2,SOD.OOT~,
__
-'----*---
-~_ $5,900 I
__
_
~
I _
__
j - ~ _
_ _
-- _
_ I `
_
-- - ..
---
~~ I -
-- ---- - - -- i
--- ~ ~ -
~ - ---~-------
IrrgatonSyslem~ 2001 20N -~ f-----
~ -'I !_~ -_
~ ~ ~---
-- - !
VolleyballCourts ~ 2000 ~ --1-
~ 20yr -
-
I
~ -
--
? --- -~ ~ -~--~ -- - -----
---_--~ ---a --I -_ i~_--
- ---~i ~--- ~ I -~------- ~------ ~--- - ~ ~.-- ~
Youth Services ~
-~.,
-- -
_
---
-
~- - -
--! ------r -----
--r -------
! ~
~~ -
- -
-; -
--
~
~
I !
~-- j
~--
~ i
--- ~
i ~
~ ~
i - -
fi ~ I
' --
-- ----
---
1 -
~
TOTAL9
! $ 17,938,345.001 $
9,500.001 $ 6,038,760.001 -----
1 $ 22,535,940.00, -
- -~~ --
a ~~
~~.
Capital Assest Value
Bridges Year Built Length Width Rating SQ FT Repalcement
Bighorn @ Pitkin 1989 23 42.5 90.6 977.5 $488,750
Black Gore Drive 1988 30 24 76.4 720 $360,000
Bridge Road 1979 39 34 86 1326 $663,000
Forest Road 1988 128 35 95.7 4480 $2,240,000
Gore Creek Drive 1990 45 38.75 99.9 1743.75 $871,875
Kinicinick East 1980 61.33 30 89.7 1839.9 $919,950
Kinicinick west 1983 52 32 83 1664 $832,000
Lupine Road 1981 51.5 28 96.7 1442 $721,000
Main Gore Drive 1975 41 30 96 1230 $615,000
Matterhorn 1970- 38.5 24.25 40.2 933.625 $466,813
Meadow Drive 1975 41.2 30 90.9 1236 $618,000
Nugget Lane 1981 41 14.25 69.6 584.25 $292,125
Vail Road 1995 64 43.33 79.7 2773.12 $1,386,560
Vail Valley Drive West 1886 42 45 77.7 1890 $945,000
Vail Valley Drive East 1985 61.5 46.5 97.6 2859.75 $1,429,875
Westhaven 1979 96 28.33 69.4 2719.68 $1,359,840
Willow bridge Road 1992 51 45 96 2295 $1,147,500
$15,357,288
Major Draninage Structures ~ roadways
Big Horn Q Columbine $150,000
Bigorn Gm Spruce $150,000
Bighorn ~ Bighorn Rd $150,000
Booth Creek ~ Booth Creek Dr $150,000
Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir $150,000
Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir $150,000
Mill Creek @ Vail Valley Drive , $150,000
Mill Creek ~ Hanson Ranck $150,000
Mill Creek ~ Gore Creek Drive $150,000
Spraddle Creek System $150,000
Middle Creek Frontage $150,000
Middle Creek Frontage $150,000
Middle Creek Meadow Drive $150,000
Red Sandstorn [~ Vail View Drive $150,000
Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage $150,000
Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage $150,000
Buffher Creek @ Circle $150,000
Buffher Creek ~ Chamonix $150,000
Buffher Creek @Frontaage $150,000
Buffher Creek ~ Frontaage $150,000
$3,000,000
Major Draninage Structures @ Trai ls
Booth Creeek $65,000
Mill Creek $65,000
Middle Creek $65,000
Middle Creek $65,000
Red Sandstone $65,000
Buffeher Creek $65,000
Buffher Creek $65,000
Deer Underpass $65,000
$520,000
Roadways( 32.4) miles Lineal Feet Percent
Lineal Feet rated 90-100 10618 6.3%
Lineal Feet rated 80-90 68362 40.8%
Lineal Feet rated 70-BO 36998 23.3%
Lineal Feet rated 60-70 20263 12.1%
Lineal Feet rated 50-60 10318 6.2%
Lineal Feet rated 40-50 7497 4.5%
Lineal Feetrated 30-40 5351 3.2%
Lineal Feet rated 20-30 2856 1.7%
Lineal Feet rated 10-20 216 0.1%
Lineal Feetrated 0-10 2947 1.8%
Lineal Feet rated poor or fair 167426 17.4% Less than 60
E Vail Rds to reconst 23010 13.7%
Golf Crse Rds to reconst 10112 6.0%
Value of roadway assest 32.4 5280 171072 275 $47,044,800
Recreation Paths
-Recreation Path(14.7) mile: 14.7 5280 77616 150 $11,642,400
Recreation Path bridges 18 250000 $4,500,000
Parks .
Playgrounds(9)
New (6) 6 350000 $2,100,000
Older(3) 3 250000 $750,000
$2,850,000
Picnic shelters 6 $300,000
Public Art 31 Varies $1,310,000
Other
Street Lights 1385 2500 $3,462,500
Streetscape 300000 60 $18,000,000
Snowmelt System 350000 35 $12,250,000
$30,250,000
Specieman Trees 100 20000 $2,000,000
Vehicles $17,241,290
Systems
Computers $3,500,000
Radio Equipment $2,500,000
Parking Systems $950,000
Electornic Signs $250,000
Furniture and Fixtures $2,500,000
Parkng Lots 500 350 175000 5 $875,000
Building Assets from Building Master Plan $175,000,000
VRD Managed Assets $20,000,000
Toatal Asset Value x345,053,278
GS MASTER
TOWN OF VAIL BU
- PLAN SUMMARY 2005
-
-
~
i __--__ I _
_
! _.-- ___-_ ' _ ____ _~_ _.. _-_._._.
I ----~--- ,
I - --
I
- - ---~-
- -- 1 ~ _
Asset i, Date Built ~ SfzeSF Life Cycle Current Value Maintenance ~ Major Upgrade r
- -- ----- Yearofremodel ' Remodel cost -
Replacement i Yearlnitial _ __
--- ----
Replacementcost ~Yearreplacement _
Replacementcost
I
i ~ _ - ~ Cost perYear ! Remodel Cost , (3141ite) ~ year o f remodel Today's Cost Replacement due year of replacement ',after remodel (113 more) -year of revised 113 more _
Bus Shelters(15) ~ 1991-1999
-- 100 ea '
----- -- 30yr
- _$247000 i $11,000 _ _ $132000 2014.2022 $342,396 $280,000 ~ _2020 2029_
- $1,045,36_8 12030-2039
-
~ _ _ $1,702_794
CommunityDevelopment r
_ ' 1967
- --'
- 7,000
---- 40yr
- $1550,0001 -
--- - i
- - $38000 $930,000 1997 _-_
T-
~ $728679 `$2,750,000
2007 ~
-~
-- - _
-
$3,509774 - _
--- 2012; _- _
-- $4,479460
-
Donavan Pavilion 2000
~
1
T
I 4 r
0Y _i _-
_
l ---
'
I
----- 2040
- -
~ I
-- -----.-.-
._ -----
'
-- --------
----
--- --- --
FireStaOon II (MainVaiq -
-
- --
1971 i --- ~---
7,150
I -
35yr ~
i~-
$1600,000 ~ $470,000
$33A00 ~
; 2001 , $447,619 $1,970,000
2006 j
$2,39454
7 20181 $4,300,26
3
FireStationl(E
astVail) _
1960 -
~ _
T 7,500 i! 30yr _
_
-- `$1650000 _
_ $28000_ - $38500D~ ___
~2003 '' - $404_2_50 __
_
$1370,0 _ 2010 - _ _
_
__ __
- $2,024,1141- - 2020 __ _
$3,297,068
_
Fountains
- - -
_
~---
. _
----
_ -
_ - ' - -
_-- - --- -
- -'- --
---
Children's
--- -~ -- - T--
- j-- -----
---I - ~
I ----- ---- ~
Slifer
Wall Street
,---
--
I _
~
_
--t-
I __
-T
~ ~_-~-
_
- ~ I
i -- ~ I
~ _
-.r -~
_~
~ ~-
- - _
~-
--- -
I
--- --
Lionshead
- j
_ I
--
~-- -- T -
i --~-- - -
I ---'-- --- I ~
--r-------1--
~~_
-- - ----~-----
Mayofs
-
Gerald Ford Amphitheater
~
--
.1987 8 2001
----
-
50 yr
I __
' 'i
~
By VVF
---
-----i
-
-
~
~ ~
- ---
-
-- - ,
2037 -2051
---- --
---j-----
',
--
--- -------- --
-
0
Housing -- __
_-..
i ~ _
-
-_ i
-i
~
-
i
----~-~
-
-
- ----~-
;
~= - --
--
-
__ -
Y _
-_ $0
Buuard Park (24) 1996 I
~ 13,500 ~ 30 yr $2,38fi 000 1 _ $48,000 I- 57,640,000 1 2019 1 817 969_,424 $2 750,000 2026 _ $8,869 025 I
-
- 2036'' $14446,707
~
Creeks'~de (ifi)
Vail Das Schone (1) -
1_
'i 5,100 l --
1,100 20yr
30 yr -~ $980,500
; $211,500 i $40,000-~$440,0
$7 600
$44,000 ~--~--
I - - ---
~- -' _ --
- ~ _
~ $0
$0
~ 750-j - 30
r 250
i J $144 __
500 $49
$7
5°0 ---- ~ _ I _
--- - ''
-- - -$0
Vail Heights (1) '~ ° y , ,
, --_ _
_
---
Innsbruck(1)-
Managers Residence _ ~ i
1979
8 850_ _
3,100
~ 30 yr_
25 yr ~ $162,750_
$612,500 -- $6,7001 565,000
$10,500
$170,000 _~
1998
' _ ;
$139,859 I _ ~
-_---$550,000
2003 ~ I
--
-T-- ---
1 :, _-_-
- 2011 j --$0
---
Library
-- -
19 17,400
-
1 40yr -
__
-$3,820,0001 _
_ _
$60,000 $990,000
__ _
2011 ~
_
--
- --- --- ,
..51535,815 ,_
- -
-
_$4,900,000]
2023
--_--~ _
_
-
- $20,500_000
---•-----
_
- --20351
---
_
----~-
$25,200,000
-
---
---
_
LionsheadTrans orla8on
p
-- --
_1980
- ~
-- _
50 r
- -
$42,240,000' ~
$1,650,000
_ $104,000 __
---
r
--
_
0
---..
$2,437,801 ~,
.....-------~ 1
_
I--
$Sfi,50_0,000 ~ 2030
~ -
_
T------
___$221,487,296 i,
_
- ---
x----
1
2 3 ----
$256,399,231
_
_ Aunlia _8wldin
Colaado West
-
1980
1980
---
1,3_50
-
40 r
-
Y__
30 yr ~ $460,000
_ _ $121,000 ,
~- --
_
--- I _
- 2010
_$0
2010 $0
-- -- - - -
~
2020
~ -
2010__ i
-~
- -~
? ------ $0 _ _
___ $0 __
- 2033
_ _
- ---
, '--
$0
--
--$0
Information Cen er
----- -
Misc.Butldin sand Sheds
9 Moved in 1990
-
Varies
I
-
----
~ 20 yr
---- $82,000 T
-
-----
$275,000 ,
~- __
--
$30,000 j - $82,000 005
-----
-
1997 $0 ,
------ -:
$64,249 ,
r _
2010
-r- -
-r
$330,000 $0
------
-----
$0 2017
---- -
I--------
- $0
$0
-- --
Munidpal Building - -
_
1967
_ _
11,425 ,
-
---
1
- _ -_-
`
r-
40yr $3,000,000,
---- ----
i ---- ------ ----
$44,000 $1,400,000
---~ ---- ----- ----- --
1997
~---- ---- _. - _...-- -
$1,096,937
_ ----- --
0 --- --- ------
---~ -r
$3,850,000,
2007
- --- - I ----- --
----
$4,913,684
-------- ---
$0 -----
2020'----------
-----'
--
$9,265,484
$D
ParkRestrooms(7)-_~
-- -- -
_
-_
1992
a
1_
ry
5 -
Y
r
_
6
36
D
$38000
$82
5 0 - -
2018
~ -
$180; 8
7 -
-
----
!
T
$6
601)
2027 i
000 -------.-
~ ---
$22
349
9437 --
-- _..-
2039
----
286
$40
137
Police De artment ~- 1- -.
- ---
-
5 07 ---y -.
~
,
5
$
~
- ~ ----
- _
,
---_ ~ .,-
$60
000 ' ~-- ---..... -
$0 ,
,
;
-- -,------ ~
,
.
--- $0~ ----- - -- ----- ~
------
$0
,
,
-
Public Works
-------- ----
Admin. Buddm
Bus Bam lVJash
9 - -- - ----
--
1
996
1996
---~ 33 250 I
1
I -
-
_
Y
~
30
yr ----
i
I
--, ~
_ _ _ _
1_
~ $2,272,000
~
I ----
,
__ ___ $82,500
$275,000
~
- --
-`-- -
2022
2019 ---- ----
-
$216,897
$630,305
2031_ _ -
_
- $2,470_000
$3,150,000 2026
~-
(
- ___ _ $1D,166,856~
__
065 _
_
~
$10
159
I
__2043
_--_--
2036 $16,258,211
-
$16
048
548
__
_
Shop- -- _-_-
Vail Transporta8on Ctr.
--- --
Ski Museum
_ i
--
_ 1980
1974 & 1990
--~--
199
---
- _
24,500
~
--
0
~-
- -
-----~
7 0 --
30yr $3, 5 ,500
50 yr $69,850,000
yr
- ~-
605000
~ $
$365,000 121,200,000
-+------
j
003
2 -- J ~ -
20.10 1
i-
---
635250
$
$179,067,600
~-
!
-
------
-
$5,150,000 2010
$77,000,000 ' 2024 -2030
------~--------=-
I
~ _
- - -
,
,
__
$7,608,896
$301,849,944
-------- ------- _ _
_
2020; ___-
2043 i
-----•-p------
2038,
,
,
$12,394,089
$569,183,087
-
Infama8o_n Center
_ 1990
-
~ --
i
__ ~--- ~
yr _ ----,
_ __
mo _ ~ __ _
---
- _ 2116 ,
_ ~_ - $0
------
- I--
- -- - }
- -
--- ----_
----- I--- 025_ I
_~-----------
--
_ _
-- 2038--- -----
___
-- --
Terminal Buildin
9 _
1995
~ _
I 35 I 2021
--- -- $o -- - 2030 -
i i
--
---I
--- -- 2042, __--
- --
-
-_
---
-- - -- i Totals ~ $143,080,000 $962,300
$136,969,500 i
-
$169,840,000 j ~ -
-
-- -
'
--
A~
UAILRECREATIONDISIRICTASSETS1605 ( -
- ! I I 1
-- - I _.__--_- -- I ---
---
~~ -~ ~ .-
- _ -_-
-- - -l --- _
_--_--
-_- `~~
! _
-----
i I J ---- l- -
Asset i
DateBuilt j
SizeS
F
LHeCyde _
; CurrentValue i Maintenance I Major Upgrade Year of remodel Remodel cost 1----'
, Replacement Yezrlnitial !
Replacementcost ~
Yearreplacement _
:Replacement cost _
_
~ ! __ _ Remodel Cost ; (3141'dej year of remodel Today's Cost 'Replacement due !
! Cost per Year year of replacement ; after remodel (113
morej_ _ !year of revised 113 more _
-- r-- ! ~- , ( T
- ---- - ~ -~--
(
~ ~ ,
-- --- --- - ~--
- --- i
- ~
- --~--- -~- -- -~-- - ~ ---, - - --
~
I 1
I
_ _ j _ I
-
--
Fard Park ii - - i - ~-J-- --- ~ --T-~ -- ~
-T I ~ _ ~
ResVOemslConcessions 1983 1,000 25yr I $ 250,000.00 $75,000 j 2002 , $150,000 ; $r300,000.001 2008 $347,287
Irngation System 1990 J 20 W ! ~ ~
~ ! ~
j - I
Fencing ! 1992 ' 2,697 I 15yr i 5 26,970.00; _
__
$13,485 I 2003 $14,868 -
-_
I $ 53,940.00! 2007 I $59,469 ~
- _
I _
Storage Facility 1990 60D i 25 yr . S 3 0 I ----~ - j --_ -~ I ~ $ 105,000.00 r ~
'~ - _-
-_
- _-
--
Bleachers 1992 I - - -
I i ------- ~ -
~--r----- -~ --- ~ _ ~
_
-- I - - ~ - ~ - ~ -
--- -. ~ -- ._._ -_
Club House 1975-1987 ; ~ 6,D00- - 'I--30yr =_S 1,700,000
.00._ 52,000 _~ 1987 I -
_ .._-
-'---- -- $ 0 00.001- 2005
---- $7,000,000 _ ----
----- `~-
-- $D
CadBam i
1987 ~
7,200 - -
-i -30yr _
i $ _
720,D0000j ~
-- _ j $185,000 newroof i 2009 I 5224_86_8_
_ ~ $ 1,260,000.00-- 2017
___
__ ___ T
__
Maintenance Shop 1975-1998 I 8,000 j 30yr i$ 1,200,000ODI i ~ ! I$ 2,000,000.001 20D6 I $0
--
StartersShack
#6
198_7_
9
1,600
! 30yr
; $_ --~-
28D,000.001
--~
5 ---T--- 7----
I
--
~ ---!---- --
I $ 480,OD000 _ I
000
001
~ $ 347
-~
- ----
-__ _ - --
_~
_ Course_Restroom
Course Restroom #12
----
Retainin Wall #3 1
91 !
1981 r~
_
1994 1,155 25
200 - --- 25 r
Y
1
112
20
~ , $
-
I ~ 202,12
.OD ~ i
----
--
r- ----- I
_ __
240A00 OD -- - - ~ ,
,
.
--
$ __ 60,000.00-- ~
55 O
I
-- __-
-~
---
-- --
- I _
- -
-9 --
- -
-- -
,
- -~__--
_. i- ------ - _
~ _ _
~
_ ~ _ _
~ ~--
-Refainmg Wall#7
_
--- -
RetainingWall#15
- -- ~--
Bridge#1
1994 _y 920
I 2061 ~ 1750
7992
~
14'x13'
, 20yr --
_-I 20yr_
-.--.-
I
_
_ t-
$ -
_ _
- -_ ~
-~--
001
100
000 -
-
--- -
~
I _
- -------
~ -- -
_
-
~ $ 75,000.00
I--
--~ -- --
I --
--- -------
_,_-__ --
~ _-~
___ -
I'._
-
--Bridge #2 _
-
1992 I
12x13 -
,
'-
-
~5 ,
.
9000000 I
_ _ _ _
_
~
- __
_
r
i
--
~ _
-_
-
Bndge #1l small
--
1992
20 z8 _
_
~
$
100 000 00 1 _
_-~-- ~ _
-__
I
~
- -
-- _
i
I
' _ - - . ,, __ -L, -- i ~ - _-_~ -_._- _
-
- _-
_Bridge#11_waWctng
Bridge#14
---- 1989 i
1975 i
-
-- 40
z16
45x11 ~-
_ _ : $I $
i $ 2 0
20D,000.00 _ -- ~ I -_ -
- -- 1- I
~
-- j I
! -~- ~
_
~ --- 1 -{ _
_
_-_
- _- - ---____ _.. _ __~ _-
_ _.`-._-
----
-
Bndge#15
y
_1975 45x11
~- --- S
- ZOD,000.0g
~ j
T
_ -----1---. ~
' _
_L _ 1-- ~-1
--_-
- ---
----- _-~ ___~_,-
Bridge #17
- 1968_
~-- 40' x 10'
--- ',
--
- I S 200,000.00'
1-- - T
---~---~ -- -'- -----'--_
~~-._-' --- -
-- -_
------ __ _
- ~ --
--LightningSheker#1
LightingShelter#5 1970 _ _
1
1970 r -
625 '~___ 20yr
_ _
625 - I 20yr I $
_
' $ _ 5,000.00__
__
3,000.001, l __ l -___
---1------
j
I
------ __ I ,
-tl-----
- ----- --- _,_-.-_
----- __--___
---------- -,-,_J_,__
--~-----
-
CartPaths
----
Irrigation System _
-1--
1998-2000,25,2
--- -
1970-1908 -
841inear
---- -~1---
it.~ 10yr
--1-.
I 20 yr ~--
$
. _
~ _
- -
250,D00.00 _ _
-- -~
-
~ -,----.--_
~
I - ~
,
---
~ -__ .___ _
Drivin Ran a
- 9-- 9 __
__._ _
1994
-- __
__ -
I y
_ 20 rr
._
-
I ~_-_
_
_ _
_ ,
~
_
- 1 -_--
--- __._
~
__
- __ --_-_-_- _
--- _
-- --~
TI ( j _ ~_
1 ~
Dobson Ice Arena
--
----- i
-
-- _
l
-- ~
~ -
----- I
_ ~ -
`
.
i __I
~
--~------- I 1
---'
~
- -- - '~ -
---.~----
Building-- i
-- -
1979-2001
-
35,000
50yr
-
$
-I-
8,750,000.00!
-----
$4,375,000 j 2017
---'
_
_
--
$ 10,SOO,OOD.OOC _2029
-
539,201,291 ~ --------
~ _
----
Refrigeration System 1979-2000
_ 16,000
-- I ~ _ -_ _~_. __ _~_
_
-
- I __-~_ _-i __-_-. _- _-~____
G mnasticsCentei
y
--- ~
,
2004 r-
i -
---~II . _
--
9,000
-I
-
40yr $
--
= ~
i
--- i
1,700,000.00
- ~ -
I
T
- ~- 2034 --
, $850,000
-'_
I ~~___-
_ j ~
-
--~---'~
_--_ ~ I
-
--.__
-
-_-__ 1-_
-
_ _
-
0
Nature Center _I
----- --1-~
1975
~-- -_
1,400
-- 1- 20yr
- !$ 245,000.001__
~^---------
__ ~ __$122,500 ~--_ S 3DO,000.OOI --~
-~----~--
-- - --
r ____
~.
-
TennisCeMer
--'- -
~
- ,
~
~
~ I -- I
~
~ -~ T
I I
~--
-
SO
-
Building -- ~ _
1991 _
3,250 _
30yr -t'
, _
$893,750 _
_-_
$1,500 ~
5446,875 I 2013 I - - j-- i_
- _ __ -_
_
Tennis Courts _ ~ 1995 l
I 53,gti2 -
~_20yr -
__
T$ 300,000.OD
- _
_
$6,000 `5150,0002010 j_
-- _
~ __ __~ _- _
~ ___
Paved walkway _
----- - 1991
, 625 -j__15yr I S 2,500.001
-- - j $5,900 j
~--- --
---}----{--- ~
-- - ___-
~ I l ~ I ~
-
--- (
- --~--
AtlrleticFeld ~ I- --- -~ ~-- -~- --~-~
- _
-~- I
-- J
T
-
- 1
-- ~-- --
ImigationSystem 2001 ,~ - I 20 yr I -
~ -
.-_
--
' - ! ------ ~ - ~
~
_ ~ ---
VolleyballCourts ~ 2000 (
- -
- ~- ZO yryr ~ -~- -_- -
-- { ~--_----'
__ - _ ~ ~`-
-~ ~ I ~_
~
Yount Services ~
__
1.-
-~;
___
i
-__._._.__
~ I
-
( ~
-_
f ^
I ~ I
__ ___
~
~
-~
I
-_
~
II
L T
1
-
-
~
- i -~- -I --~-- -
I ~-~-
~ I ~-- _-~
^ -- ~- -~
- _
! j TOTALS I $ 17,938,345.DOj S ---
9,500.001$ 6,038,760.001 I $ 22.535,940.00 ~ ' I
U
Capital Street Maintenance Budget
Budget Prioritization Summary
September 6`h, 2005
Background:
In order to preserve the structural integrity of the Town of Vail's 32.4 miles of streets and
maintain them to a high standard, the Public Works Department uses updated visual pavement
inspection reports, street maintenance history, traffic loads, street classification, and a database
software program called Pavement View Plus. The Town's streets are rated using the USACE
Pavement Maintenance Management Program, detailed in Technical Manual TM 5-623. The
inspection ratings are based on a scale from 0 to .100, where 100 is Excellent, and less than 40 is
poor.
It is our goal to maintain all Town streets at a level greater than 70. Once a road approaches 40 it
is considered for reconstruction. Currently approximately 70% of our roads are rated above 70,
19% between 50 and 70, and 11 % below 50. Capital street dollars are budgeted based upon
current conditions of the streets, historical maintenance, and with the objective in mind to
preserve streets that have been reconstructed and/or have had significant capital investment. The
Town currently has an asphalt street replacement value of approximately $47 million dollars of
which $38 million is of already reconstructed streets (Does not include Streetscape/Villages).
Required Maintenance:
In order to preserve the Town's streets and our capital investment the Town has entered into a
street maintenance program that includes a variety of rehabilitation techniques, including: crack
sealing, shouldering, surface seals, asphalt patching, concrete repair, full depth pavement
patching, asphalt mill and overlays, drainage improvements, and reconstruction; and many
regulatory requirements including: a 5-year street cut moritorium on all newly paved roads, flow
fill requirements for narrow utility trenches, infrared seamless asphalt patchback requirements,
utility stubouts to empty lots during road reconstruction, and 2 year construction warranties. As
streets are reconstructed they are entered into this maintenance program in order to extend the
pavements life to an excess of 50 years. The program requires these streets be continuously
monitored and maintained. With 32.4 miles of streets within the Town this requires a rotating
schedule of street maintenance in order to spread out the costs to become manageable.
Based on this maintenance program a long term Capital Streets Maintenance Budget has been
prepared, that includes the above mentioned major and minor maintenance programs for those
streets already reconstructed as well as "bandaids" for those streets that still need to be
reconstructed at a future date.
Future Needs:
As those streets that have not yet been reconstructed continue to deteriorate and are repaired with
`bandaids', the `bandaid' repairs will continue to be less effective and become more costly.
Therefore the continuation of Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Projects is imperative. These
projects were originally post-poned unti12009 due to budget re-prioritization (Streetscape). It is
the Public Works Department desire to continue on with these projects starting in 2009 and
continuing thru 2011 or 2012. However if other needs supercede in priority those streets could
be held off for another 10 years with a timely asphalt overlay and then surface treatments until
2016, at which time the Town should commit to reconstruction. Currently there are
approximately 5-6 miles of roadway that have not yet been reconstructed within the Town, most
noteably, Mill Creek Circle, Willow Rd., Willow Ct., Vail Valley Drive, and the majority of the
East Vail Roads. This can be expected to cost approximately $9-$1 l million dollars.
~~
Future Wishlist:
In order to more effectively convey traffic throughout the valley the following improvements are
desired by the Public Works Department:
1. Implementation of the Frontage Rd Masterplan, including medians, accel/decal lanes and
turn lanes.
2. Simba Run underpass
3. Additional strategically placed roundabouts.
4. Gold Peak one way route bridge to Ford Park lot
5. Additional Parking structure (Ford Park/Holy Cross Lot)
6. Separated recreation paths (East Vail)
7. Complete the Frontage Rd. bikepath Main Vail to West Vail both sides of Interstate
8. Develop comprehensive integrated travel demand management system which emphasizes
use of transit/pedestrian modes and de-emphasizes use of the automobile.
a. Paid parking year round day and night.
b. Enhanced Transit Centers
c. Require bike racks at new developments
d. Require developer to integrate employee van pool system to discourage traffic.
e. Work with van companies to~provide a more economic solution to renting a car
for families.
9. Move/Mitigate I-70 (Noise mitigation/Cut&cover/Tunnel)
10. Regional system of transit between summit stage, RFTA, ECO.
~C' b
2006 Capital Improvments Budget
2006 Budget: $ 932,000.00
2006 Drainage: $ 75,000.00
Total Budget: $ 1,007,000.00
Ca itallm rovement Estimated Cost
Drainage Improvements (North West Vail) $ 375,000.00
1.5" Mill & Overlay (North West Vail) $ 300,000.00
Crack Seal $ 5,000.00
Stripping $ 20,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00
Concrete repair $ 42,400.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Red Sandstone Drainage Improvement $ 75,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 15,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 8,000.00
Bridge Improvement $ 15,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 91,540.00
$ 1,006,940.00
Drainage Improvements Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Storm Sewer 3000 LF $ 50.00 $ 150,000.00
Inlets 10 EA $ 3,125.00 $ .31,250.00
Manholes 5 EA $ 3,750.00 $ 18,750.00
Concrete Curb/Gutter/Pan 4000 LF $ 43.75 $ 175,000.00
$ 375,000.00
1.5" Mill 8 Overlay
Mill 14200 SY $ 6.88 $ 97,625.00
Asphalt 2300 Ton $ .87.50 $ 201,250.00
$ 298,875.00
~.
2007 Capital Improvments Budget
2007 Budget: $ 1,032,000.00
2007 Drainage: S 75,000.00
Sub Total: $ 1,107,000.00
Rolled to 2005 $ (365,000.00)
Total Budget: $ 742,000.00
Ca ital Im rovement Estimated Cost
1.5" Overlay $ 105,000.00
Slurry Seal $ 185,000.00
Crack Seal $ 85,000.00
Stripping $ 21,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00
Concrete repair $ 50,000.00
Guardrail $ 35,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 75,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 8,300.00
Pavement Inspection $ 15,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 67,430.00
$ 741,730.00
7.5" Aspahtt Overlay Quantity Unit
Asphalt (East Vail Rds., Mill Creek Circle, Willow Rds.) 1150 Ton
Slurry Seal
Golf Course Rds., Vail Valley Drive, Spruce Way, Bighorn Rd, Elkhorn 60000 SY
Forest Rd., E. Meadow, Vail Rd., Glen Lyon Rds.
Unit Cost Totai Cost
$ 89.60 $ 103,040.00
$ 2.88 $ 172,800.00
~6
2008 Capital Improvments Budget
2008 Budget: $ 950,000.00
2008 Drainage: $ 75,000.00
Total Budget: $ 1,025,000.00
Ca itallm rovement Estimated Cost
Rockledge/Beaver Dam Drainage Improvements $ 375,000.00
Rockledge/Beaver Dam Rd. Overlay/Water Line Improvements $ 175,000.00
West Vail Roundabout Curb/Gutter $ 200,000.00
Stripping $ 22,000.00
Crack Seal $ 5,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00
Concrete repair $ 40,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 15,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 8,600.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 93,060.00
$ 1,023,660.00
Drainage Improvements
Storm Sewer
Box Culvert
Inlets
Manholes
Concrete Curb/Gutter/Pan
Quantity
Unit
3000 LF
1 EA
10 EA
5 EA
3000 LF
7.5" Mill 8~ Overlay
Mill
Asphalt
7000 SY
1000 Ton
Unit Cost Total Cost
$ 52.40 $ 157,200.00
$ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
$ 3,275.00 $ 32,750.00
$ 3,930.00 $ 19,650.00
$ 45.85 $ 137, 550.00
$ 367,150.00
$ 7.21 $ 50,435.00
$ 91.70 $ 91,700.00
$ 142,135.00
~b
2009 Capital Improvments Budget
2009 Budget:
2009 Drainage:
Total Budget:
$ 980,000.00
$ 75,000.00
$ 1,055,000.00
1.5" Mill and Overlay $ 555,000.00
,Stripping $ 23,000.00
iAsphalt Patching $ 35,000.00
Concrete repair $ 35,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Crack Seal $ 5,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 55,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 15,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 8,900.00
Pavement Inspection $ 16,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 95,790.00
$ 1,053,690.00
1.5" Aspahlt Overlay Quantity
Mill
Asphalt (Sandstone District, Spraddle Creek Rd.)
Slurry Seal
North West Vail Rds., Lupine Dr, Bridge Rd., Buffehr Creek Rds.)
2009 Capital Projects-Budget
Neighborhood Street Project
Vail Valley Drive
Unit Unit Cost. Total Cost
24000 SY $ 7.37 $ 176,880.00
4000 Ton $ 93.80 $ 375,200.00
$ 552,080.00
66000 SY $ 3.02 $ 198,990.00
$ 1,500,000.00
4400 LF $ 335.50 $ 1,476,200.00
Bridge Replacement $ 1,000,000.00
Matterhorn Bridge $ 1,000,000.00
2010 Capital Improvments Budget
2010 Budget:
2010 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Ca itallm rovement Estimated Cost
1.5" Mill and Overlay (Intermtn District) $ 145,000,.00
1.5" Mill and Overlay (Booth Falls District) $ 320,000.00
2"Mill and Overlay (WD, Vail Rd. (s), E. LH Circle) $ 275,000.00
Stripping $ 24,000.00
Crack Seal ~ $ .7,500.00
Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00
Concrete repair $ 50,000.00
Guardrail $ 35,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 85,000.00
Storm Water Management $ ,30,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 9,400.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 106,090.00
$ 1,166, 990.00
1.5" Mill & Asphalt Overlay Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Intermountain District
Mill 6000 SY $ 7.54 $ 45,210.00
Asphalt 1000 Ton $ 95.90 $ 95,900.00
$ 141,110.00
Booth Falls District
Mill 13000 SY $ 7.54 $ 97,955.00
Asphalt 2200 Ton $ 95.90 $ 210,980.00
$ 308,935.00
2" Mill & Asphalt Overlay
Vail Valley Drive, Vail Rd. (s), E. LH Circle, W LH Circle
Mill 14000 SY $ 7.54 $ 105,490.00
Asphalt 1700 Ton $ 95.90 $ 163,030.00
$ 268,520.00
2010 Capital Projects Budget
Neighborhood Street Project $ 4,100,000.00
Columbine Drive 11800 LF $ 343.75 $ 4,056,250.00
Spruce Way
Spruce Dr.
Streamside Circle West
Streamside Circle East
Nugget Lane .
Glen Lyon
Mill Creek Circle
Willow Rd
Willow Ct
Bridge Replacement $ 1,000,000.00
Nugget Lane Bridge $ 1,000,000.00
~6
2011 Capital Improvments Budget
2011 Budget:
2011 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Ca ital Im rovement Estimated Cost
Slurry $ 125,000.00
1.5" Mill and Overlay (Matterhorn) $ 330,000.00
Stripping $ 25,000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Asphalt Patching $ 75,000.00
Concrete repair $ 60,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 85,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 9,800.00
Pavement Inspection $ 17,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 77,430.00
$ 851,730.00
1.5" Aspahlt Overlay Quantity Unit
Mill 13000 SY
Asphalt (Matterhorn) 2300 Ton
Slurry Seal
(Beaver Dam Rd, Kinnick, Bellflower,Rockledge, Forest) 35000 SY
2011 Capital Projects Budget
Neighborhood Street Project
Meadow Dr. 12500 LF
Meadow Ln
Juniper
Main Gore Drive (N&S) ~
Main Gore Circle
Ute Ln
Black Bear
Black Gore
Snowshoe
Grouse
Length
10100
Unit Cost Total Cost
$ 7.70 $ 100,100.00
$ 98.00 $ 225,400.00
$ 325,500.00
$ 3.15 $ 110,250.00
$ 4,400,000.00
$ 352.00 $ 4,400,000.00
~b
2092 Capital Improvments Budget
2012 Budget:
2012 Drainage: _
Total Budget: $
Estimated Cost
Ca itallm rovement
Slurry (East Vail, Mill Crk, Willow Rds, Sandstone) $ 300,000.00
Stripping $ 26,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00
Concrete repair $ 60,000.00
Crack Seal $ 95,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 400,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
GPS Data Collection. $ 10,200.00
Contingency (10%) $ 101,120.00
$ 1,112, 320.00
~b
2013 Capital Improvments Budget
2013 Budget:
2013 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Estimated Cost
:apital Improvement
ilurrv (Intermtn. Booth Falls. Forest, WD, E. LD Cr, Bighorn, Vail Rd) $ 325,000.00
1.5"-Mill Overlay (Golf Course) $ 350,000.00
Stripping $ 27,000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Asphalt Patching $ 75,000.00
Concrete repair $ 60,000.00
Guardrail $ 35,000.00
Pavement Inspection $ 18,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 10,600.00
Contingency (10%) $ 103,310.00
$ 1,136,410.00
~b
2014 Capital Improvments Budget
2014 Budget:
2014 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Estimated Cost
Ca ital Im rovement
Slurry (Matterhorn, East Vail 1&2, Bighorn) $ 550,000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Stripping $ 28,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00
Concrete repair $ 60,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 11,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 87,150.00
958, 650.00
~Gb
2015 Capital Improvments Budget
2015 Budget:
2015 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Ca ital Im rovement Estimated Cost
Slurry (Cascade) $ 75,000.00
Stripping $ 29,000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Asphalt Patching $ 75,000.00
Concrete repair $ 60,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00
Pavement Inspection $ 19,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
GPSDataCollection $ 11,400.00
Contingency (10%) $ 41,190.00
$ 453,090.00
2015 Capital Projects Budget
Bridge Replacement $ 1,300,000.00
Bridge Rd. Bridge $ 1,300,000.00
~b
2016 Capital Improvments Budget
2016 Budget:
2016 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Estimated Cost
Ca itallm rovement
Slurrv (Beaver Dam Forest Rd__ Rockledge. Golf Course. NW Vail $ 275.000.00
1.5" Mill & Overlay (Lupine, Bridge, Willow, Lionsridge $ 610,000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Stripping $ 30,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00
Concrete repair $ 70,000.00
Guardrail $ 35,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 11,800.00
Contingency (10%) $ 112,250.00
1, 371, 550.00
~~
2017 Capital Improvments Budget
2017 Budget:
2017 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Estimated Cost
Ca itallm rovement
Slurry (Sandstone $ 100.000.00
1.5" Mill & Overlay (Kinnick, Belllflower $ 125,000.00
Crack Seal $ 105,000.00
Stripping $ 31,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 85,000.00
Concrete repair $ 70,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
Pavement Inspection $ 20,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 12,200.00
Contingency (10%) $ 55,600.00
$ 738,800.00
~~
2018 Capital Improvments Budget
2018 Budget:
2018 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Estimated Cost
Ca itallm rovement
Slurry (Intrmtn, WD $ 100,000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Stripping $ 32,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00
Concrete repair $ 70,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 12,600.00
Contingency (10%) $ 31,450.00
$ 513,550.00
~b
2019 Capital Improvments Budget
2019 Budget:
2019 Drainage:
Total Budget: ~ $ -
Estimated Cost
Capital Improvement
Slurry (Booth Falls, LionsRidge $ 200,000.00
1.5" Mill & Overlay (Bighorn Rd.) $ 800;000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Stripping $ 33,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 85,000.00
Concrete repair $ 70,000.00
Guardrail $ 35,000.00
Storm Water Management $
~ 30,000.00
Pavement Inspection $ 21,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 13,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 126,050.00
$ 1,515,550.00
~b
2020Capital lmprovments Budget
2020 Budget:
2020 Drainage:
Total Budget: $
Estimated Cost
Ca itallm rovement
4hirrv (Fact Vail 1 I unine 6ridae Rd.l $ 200,000.00
Crack Seal
Stripping
Asphalt Patching
Concrete repair
Guardrail
Storm Water Management
Drainage Improvement
Bridge Improvement
GPS Data Collection
Contingency (10%)
$ 7,500.00
$ 34,000.00
$ 65,000.00
$ 70,000.00
$ 10,000.00
$ 30,000.00
$ 110,000.00
$ 30,000.00
$ 13,600.00
$ 57,010.00
$ 627,110.00
~~
2021 Capital Improvments Budget
2021 Budget:
2021 Drainage:
Total Budget: $
Estimated Cost
Ca itallm rovement
Slurrv (East Vail 2. Matterhorn) ~ 315.000.00
Crack Seal $ 7,500.00
Stripping $ 35,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 85,000.00
Concrete repair $ 80,000.00
Guardrail $ 10,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
Pavement Inspection $ 21,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 110,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 14,200.00
Contingency (10%) $ 70,770.00
$ 778,470.00
~~
2022Capital lmprovments Budget
2022 Budget:
2022 Drainage:
Total Budget: $ -
Estimated Cost
Ca itallm rovement
Slurry (Golf Course) $ 150,000.00
1.5" Asphalt Overlay (Glen Lyon) $ 300,000.00
Crack Seal $ 120,000.00
Stripping $ 36,000.00
Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00
Concrete repair $ 80,000.00
Guardrail $ ~ 35,000.00
Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00
Drainage Improvement $ 110,000.00
Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00
GPS Data Collection $ 15,000.00
Contingency (10%) $ 97,100.00
$ 1, 068,100.00
~ Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI
1~,;;
Sort Cu rent fr~~ettcn ti.)?G.•eai' Ccrc!c-::r: t;xte:< t)r.;ceneir: .
Vail Pavement Yinpsections-®CY
ID °
. '•Descr`iption
_m .. .... From~,.• '~•;.,
_.... To '. ~ _
,. , ., tengtH ;
. Zone. r- OCI
- .~
...
5990.00 Elkhorn FRONTAGE RD ADMIN .
845.00 ft Main Vail 100.00
8208.00 Bridge Rd ~ LUPINE DR CDS 173.00 ft East Vail 98.36
2200.00 Alta Dr. GORE CREEK DR -CDS 120.00 ft West Vail 97.00
2270.00 Westhaven Dr S. FRONTAGE RD STR 1,340.00 ft Cascade 97.00
8162.00 Spruce Way SPRUCE DR COLUMBINE DR 1,060.00 ft East Vail 95.00
8220.00 Bighorn Rd STR-BIGHORN CRK MAIN GORE DR N 5,700.00 ft East Vail 94.75
8175.00 Spruce Ct RED SANDSTONE RD CDS 64.00 ft East Vail 92.20
1010.00 Bellflower Dr KINNICKINNICK RD TOV LIMITS 800.00 ft Intermountain 90.53
3100.00 Red Sandstone Ct RED SANDSTONE DR CDS 283.00 ft Sandstone 90.14
2160.00 Matterhorn Cir S. FRONTAGE RD W GORE CRK DR 233.00 ft West Vail 90.00
3020.00 Forest Rd VAIL RD BEAVER DAM RD 3,105.00 ft Main Vail 89.96
8210.00 Bighorn Rd FRONTAGE RD END EB BRIDGE RD 861.00 ft East Vail 89.82
2140.00 Gore Creek Dr West S. FRONTAGE RD MATTERHORN CIR.(N) 2,494.00 ft West Vail 89.15
5000.00 Cabin Cir CDS HORNSILVER CIR 227.00 ft Main Vail 89.08
2170.00 Matterhorn Cir GENEVA DR MATTERHORN CT 1,195.00 ft West Vail 88.31
2040.00 Buffehr Creek Rd LIONS RIDGE LOOP CDS 6,008.00 ft North West Vail 88.27
2115.00 Arosa Dr. DAVOS TRAIL CHAMONIX LN 675.00 ft North West Vail 86.96
8155.00 Columbine Dr BIGHORN RD STR 1,250.00 ft East Vail 86.90
5010.00 Hornsilver Cir VAIL VALLEY DR CABIN CIR 273.00 ft Main Vail 86.80
2145.00 Shasta PI W GORE CRK DR CDS 263.00 ft West Vail 86.29
5020.00 Vail Valley Dr GOLD PEAK/MANOR VAIL PTARMIGAN RD EAST 4,048.00 ft Main Vail 85.83
2130.00 Cortina Ln DAVOS TRAIL CDS 1,750.00 ft North West Vail 85.70
1030.00 Snowberry Dr BASINGDALE BLVD CDS 1,740.00 ft Intermountain 85.55
5030.00 Homestake Cir VAIL VALLEY DR CDS 406.00 ft Main Vail 85.34
8192.00 Lupine Dr STR BRIDGE RD 1,760.00 ft East Vail 85.32
4060.00 Lionshead Cir West S.FRONTAGE RD.(WB) S. FRONTAGE RD 1,269.00 ft Main Vail 84.82
7030.00 Booth Creek Dr ASPEN LN CDS(WB) - 200.00 ft . Booth Creek Falls 84.80
8200.00 Bridge Rd BIGHORN RD STR 253.00 ft East Vail 84.60
8230.00 Bighorn Rd BRIDGE RD STR-BIGHORN CRK 3,255.00 ft East Vail 84.51
6035.00 Sunburst Dr GOLF CRSE CLUBHSE CDS 2,395.00 ft Main Vail 84.40
2020.00 Meadow Ridge Rd BUFFEHR CREEK RD WIDCH 660.00 ft North West Vail 84.00
Thursday , September O1, 2005
1 of 5
.57 Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI
ID Description From . , ,~_ To
4101.00 Bridge St COVERED BRIDGE HANSON RANCH RD
1040.00 Larkspur Ln KINNICKINNICK RD CDS
2165.00 Matterhorn Cir W GORE CRK DR GENEVA DR
7020.00 Booth Creek Dr CDS (EB) ASPEN LN
2000.00 Lions Ridge Loop VAIL VIEW DRIVE BUFFEHR CREEK RD
5050.00 Eagles Nest Cir VAIL VALLEY DR CDS
5045.00 Fairway Dr PTARMIGAN RD CDS
4140.00 Willow Bridge Rd GORE CREEK DR E. MEADOW DR
7070.00 Katsos Ranch Rd FRONTAGE RD CDS
2070.00 Chamonix Ln BUFFEHR CREEK RD CHAMONIX RD
2150.00 Geneva Dr MATTERHORN CIR.(N) CDS
3090.00 Vail View Dr SANDSTONE DR RED SANDSTONE DR
1000.00 Kinnickinnick Rd S. FRONTAGE RD W BASINGDALE BLVD
3000.00 Beaver Dam Rd. VAIL RD FOREST RD
4075.00 Vail Rd FOREST RD STR
1005.00 Kinnickinnick Rd BASINGDALE BLVD S. FRONTAGE RD W
2190.00 Alpine Drive W. GORE CREEK DR. SIERRA TR
2030.00 Buffehr Creek Rd N. FRONTAGE RD LIONS RIDGE LOOP
3130.00 Potato Patch Dr RED SANDSTONE RD CDS
4065.00 Spraddle Creek Rd N. FRONTAGE RD GATE
1990.00 Glacier Ct LIONS RIDGE LOOP CDS
5046.00 Fairway Ct FAIRWAY DR CDS
3080.00 Sandstone Dr CDS WIDCH
• 5015.00 Hornsilver Cir CABIN CIR CDS
3085.00 Sandstone Dr WIDCH VAIL VIEW DR
2010.00 Circle Dr CHAMONIX LN BUFFEHR CREEK RD
8190.00 Lupine Dr BIGHORN RD STR
8180.00 Willow way CDS LUPINE DR
3070.00 Vail View Dr LIONS RIDGE LOOP SANDSTONE DR
5040.00 Ptarmigan Rd VAIL VALLEY DR(EB) VAIL VALLEY DR
1020.00 Basingdale Blvd KINNICKINNICK RD SNOWBERRY DR
3060.00 Lions Ridge Loop N. FRONTAGE RD VAIL VIEW DR
8145.00 Glen Falls Ln NUGGET LANE CDS
8196.00 Lupine Dr BRIDGE RD CDS
8204.00 Bridge Rd STR LUPINE DR
1050.00 Larkspur Ct LARKSPUR LN CDS
2080.00. Chamonix Ln CHAMONIX RD N. FRONTAGE RD
Thursday, September O1, 2005
•Length Zone . - OCI
530.00 ft Main Vail 83.94
896.00 ft Intermountain 83.92
186.00 ft West Vail 83.84
1,142.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 83.58
5,272.00 ft North West Vail 83.03
185.00 ft Main Vail 82.80
619.00 ft Main Vail 82.80
422.00 ft Main Vail 82.78
1,473.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 82.40
2,750.00 ft North West Vail 82.35
898.00 ft West Vail 81.77
430.00 ft Sandstone 81.64
1,240.00 ft Intermountain 81.08
2,778.00 ft Main Vail 81.02
591.00 ft Main Vail ~ 80.91
1,053.00 ft Intermountain 80.76
1,536.00 ft West Vail 80.55
1,197.00 ft North West Vail 80.51
7,280.00 ft Sandstone 80.51
3,797.00 ft Main Vail 80.49
327.00 ft North West Vail 79.76
166.00 ft Main Vail 79.60
1,383.00 ft Sandstone 79.49
255.00 ft Main Vail 79.39
950.00 ft Sandstone 79.31
456.00 ft North. West Vail 79.26
390.00 ft East Vail 79.04
308.00 ft East Vail 79.03
1,616.00 ft Sandstone 78.94
1,771.00 ft Main Vail 78.93
1,197.00 ft Intermountain 78.80
743.00 ft Sandstone 78.77
578.00 ft East Vail 77.90
480.00 ft East Vail 77.82
200.00 ft East Vail 77.41
136.00 ft Intermountain 77.20
2,349.00 ft North West Vail 76.64
2 of 5
Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI
-~
ID.~:. ' : •
.Description:
From ..
To
~.
Length ....
,.
' 2one° ~
.0`CI! -'`
.. ~, ;
2185.00 Matterhorn Ct MATTERHORN CIR CDS 370.00 ft West Vail 76.42
2090.00 Chamonix Rd N. FRONTAGE RD CHAMONIX LN 780.00 ft North West Vail 76.29
2155.00 Lucerne Dr MATTERHORN CIR (N) CDS 380.00 ft West Vail 76.24
4090.00 Willow Place WILLOW RD (WB) WILLOW RD 478.00 ft Main Vail 75.69
3120.00 Red Sandstone Rd N. FRONTAGE RD VAIL VIEW DR. 1,634.00 ft Sandstone 75:66
8158.00 Columbine Dr STR CDS 653.00 ft East Vail 75.40
4115.00 Hanson Ranch Rd B BRIDGE ST. HANSON R. RD.-CHUTE 230.00 ft Main Vail 75.17
4034.00 Meadow Dr East VILLAGE CTR RD GATE 500.00 ft Main Vail 75.04
8170.00 Spruce Dr BIGHORN RD SPRUCE WAY 185.00 ft East Vail 75.04
8030.00 Black Bear Ln CDS BLACK GORE DR 516.00 ft East Vail 74.78
2180.00 Matterhorn Cir MATTERHORN CT GENEVA DR 1,793.00 ft West Vail 73.95
7040.00 .Booth Falls Ct BOOTH FALLS RD CDS 658.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 73.90
6030.00 Sunburst Dr VAIL VALLEY DR(N) GOLF CRSE CLUBHSE 1,195.00 ft Main Vail 73.84
6900.00 Manns Ranch Rd FRONTAGE RD CDS 910.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 73.83
8110.00 Meadow Dr STREAMSIDE CIR E JUNIPER LANE 2,550.00 ft East Vail 73.18
6010.00 Vail Valley Dr SUNBURST DR S. FRONTAGE RD 1,130.00 ft Main Vail 72.61
4100.00 Gore Creek Dr VAIL RD VAIL VALLEY DR 1,790.00 ft Main Vail 72.15
2230.00 Sierra Trail ALPINE DR CDS 631.00 ft West Vail 71.79
7000.00 Aspen Ln S. FRONTAGE RD BOOTH CREEK DR 822.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 71.56
8065.00 Main Gore Dr STR BIGHORN RD 1,045.00 ft East Vail 71.47
7015.00 Bald Mountain Rd MANNS RANCH RD CDS 3,200.00 ft Booth. Creek Falls 71.42
3105.00 Sandy In POTATO PATCH DR CDS 385.00 ft Sandstone 71.41
8120.00 Streamside Cir East BIGHORN RD (WB) BIGHORN RD 1,599.00 ft East Vail 71.24
2100.00 Garmish Dr AROSA DR CDS 1,738.00 ft North West Vail 71.16
8060.00 Main Gore Dr MEADOW DR STR 521.00 ft East Vail 70.28
2300.00 Greenhill Ct WESTHAVEN DR CDS 1,457.00 ft Cascade 69.70
3010.00 Beaver Dam Circle BEAVER DAM RD CDS 771.00 ft Main Vail 68.53
4108.00 Hansen Ranch Chute HANSON R. RD.-A GORE CREEK DR 80.00 ft Main Vail 67.68
2125.00 Davos Trail CORTINA LANE CDS 1,275.00 ft North West Vail 67.19
8070.00 Gore Cir MAIN GORE DR N MAIN GORE DR N 1,622.00 ft East Veil 66.80
4070.00 Vail Rd 5. FRONTAGE RD STR 930.00 ft Main Vail ~ 66.21
7060.00 Booth Falls Rd FRONTAGE RD BOOTH FALLS CT 975.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 65.75
3030.00 Rockledge Rd CDS FOREST RD 1,098.00 ft Main Vail 65.63
4032.00 Meadow Dr East SLIFER PLAZA VILLAGE CENTER RD 490.00 ft Main Vail 65.45
2025.00 Meadow Ridge Rd WIDCH END 313.00 ft. North West Vail 65.40
1025.00 Basingdale Blvd SNOWBERRY DR TOV LIMITS 586.00 ft Intermountain 65.40
8010.00 Grouse Ln MAIN GORE DRS CDS 427.00 ft East Vail 64.31
Thursday , September O1, 2005 3 of 5
~ Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI
~ ID ` ~ . Description :.~ From ~ To ~ Length Zone ~ - OCI
4040.00 Meadow Dr West VAIL RD CDS 1,520.00 ft Main Vail 63.86
4035.00 Meadow Dr East GATE VAIL RD 510.00 ft Main Vail 63.74
2120.00 Davos Trail AROSA DR CORTINA LANE 188.00 ft North West Vail 63.71
2110.00 Arosa Dr DAVOS TRAIL N. FRONTAGE RD 1,654.00 ft North West Vail 63.10
6020.00 Springhill Ln VAIL VALLEY DR(S) CDS 451.00 ft Main Vail 62.85
4010.00 Vail Valley Dr S. FRONTAGE RD GOLD PEAK/MANOR VAIL 2,136.00 ft Main Vail 62.21
4030.00 Meadow Dr East VAIL VALLEY DR SLIFER PLAZA 443.00 ft Main Vail 61.00
8080.00 Meadow Dr JUNIPER LANE MAIN GORE DR 1,879,00 ft East Vail 60.90
8090.00 Juniper Ln MEADOW DR MAIN GORE DRS 1,458.00 ft East Vail 60.43
7080.00 Falline Dr FRONTAGE RD CDS 1,600.00 ft East Vail 59.80
8100.00 Meadow Ln MEADOW DR (EB} MEADOW DR 973.00 ft East Vail 58.13
7050.00 Booth Falls Rd BOOTH FALLS CT END 200.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 57.66
8130.00 Streamside Cir West BIGHORN RD (WB) BIGHORN RD 770.00 ft East Vail 57.46
2290.00 Westhaven Cir WESTHAVEN DR GREENHILL COURT 3,675.00 ft Cascade 57.38
4080.00 Willow Rd GORE-CREEK DR VAIL RD 635.00 ft Main Vail 55.98
4110.00 Hanson Ranch Rd A VAIL VALLEY DR HANSON R. f2D.-CHUTE 478.00 ft Main Vail 54.97
7010.00 Aspen Ct CDS ASPEN LN 191.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 54.96
3150.00 Ma Bell Rd N. FRONTAGE RD END 510.00 ft Main Vail 54.76
8142.00 Nugget Ln STR STREAMSIDE CIR W 100.00 ft East Vail 54.75
8000.00 Snowshoe Ln CDS MAIN GORE DR 5 386.00 ft East Vail 53.50
1980.00 Moraine Dr LIONS RIDGE LOOP CDS 800.00 ft North West Vail 51.34
4120.00 Village Center Rd E. MEADOW DR S. FRONTAGE RD 282.00 ft Main Vail 49.86
8240.00 Bighorn Rd MAIN .GORE DR N IRONGATE(EAST END) 2,520.00 ft East Vail 48.67
8166.00 Spruce Way COLUMBINE DR BIGHORN RD 1,689.00 ft East Vail 47.61
3040.00 Forest Rd BEAVER DAM RD STR 1,875.00 ft Main Vail 47.07
4130.00 Mill Creek Cir VAIL VALLEY DR MILL CREEK CIR 135.00 ft Main Vail 46.11
8140.00 Nugget Ln CDS STR 570.00 ft East Vail 43.10
4105.00 Gore Creek Dr VAIL VALLEY DR END(EAST) 680.00 ft Main Vail 41.54
6000.00 Vail Valley Dr PTARMIGAN RD EAST SUNBURST DR 1,963.00 ft Main Vail 39.31
3045.00 Forest Rd STR S. FRONTAGE RD 440.00 ft Main Vail 38.94
4050.00 Lionshead Cir East CDS S. FRONTAGE RD 1,334.00 ft Main Vail 35.67
4135.00 Mill Creek Cir MILL CREEK CIR MILL CREEK CIR 1,614.00 ft Main Vail .34.88
8050.00 Main Gore Dr CDS MEADOW DR 1,708.00 ft East Vail 28.48
2275.00 Westhaven Dr STR WESTHAVEN CIR 310.00 ft Cascade 28.44
8040.00 Black Gore Dr MAIN GORE DRS CDS 847.00 ft East Vail 26.28
4990.00 Chalet Rd VAIL VALLEY DR GORE CREEK DR 216.00 ft Main Vail 14.29
Thursday, September O1, 2005
4 of 5
Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI
S? °ID f""' `Description - ' . Farom To
£3160.00 ~ _
Spruce Way CDS (EB) SPRUCE DR
8020.00 ~ Ute Ln CDS MAIN GORE DR S
3050.00 Lionshead Place CDS W. LIONSHEAD CIR
8150.00 Columbine Dr BIGHORN RD .LUPINE DR
1007.00 Kinnickinnick Ct
4045.00 Meadow Dr West ICE ARENA ICE ARENA
Total Segments 147
~` Length 2onei OGI
789.00 ft East Vail 6.55
229.00 ft East Vail 0.00 '
430.00 ft Main Vail 0.00
1,157.00 ft East Vail 0.00
200.00 ft Intermountain 0.00
142.00 ft Main Vail
Thursday, September 01, 2005 ~ 5 of 5
~~
Description
2012 Est
2013 imated Yea Co
2014 sts
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Pavementlns elion 2006 $ 2007
15,000.00 2008 $ 2009
16,000.00 2010 $ 2011
17,000.00 $ 18,006.00 $ 19,000.00
11
800
00 $
$ 20,000.00
200
12
00
$
12
00
600 $
$ 21,000.00
13
000
00
$
00
13
600 $
$ 21,000.00
14,200.00
$
15,000.E
Data CollelioNlntem $ 8,000.00 $ 8,306.00 $ 8,600.00 $ 6,900.00 $ 9,400.00 $ 9,800.00 $ 10,200.00 $ 16,600.00 $ 11,000.00
60
28
000 $
$ 11,400.00
00
29
000 $
$ ,
.
060
00
30 $ .
,
000
00
31 $ ,
.
32
000.00 $ ,
.
33,000.00 $ ,
.
34,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 36,000.00
Stri in $ 20,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 23,0011.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ ,
. ,
.
00
7
500 $ .
,
500
00
7 $ .
,
000
00
105 $ ,
7
00
500 $ 7
500.00 $ 7
500.00 $ 7,560.00 $ 120,000.00
Crack Seal $ 5,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 5,000.06 $ 5,600.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 95,000.00
000
00
50 $
$ 7,500.00
75
000
00 $
$ 7,500.00
00
50
000 $
$ ,
.
00
75
000 $ .
,
000.00
65 $ .
,
85,000.00 $ ,
.
65,000.00 $ ,
85,000.00 $ ,
65,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 65,000.00
As ahltPatchi $ 50,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ .
, ,
. ,
. ,
.
00
60
000 $ ,
00
70
000 $ 00
000
70 $ 70
000
00 $ 000.00
70 $ 70
000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 80,060.E
t
R
i $ 42
400
00 $ 50
000
00 $ 00
240
000 $ 00
000
35 $ 000.00
50 $ 60,000.00 8 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ ,
. .
, .
, ,
. , , 0 $ 00
000
35
Concre
e
r
e a ,
. ,
. ,
. .
, , 000
00
0 $ 10
000
00 $ 35
000
00 $ 00
10
000 $ 10,000.00 $ 35,006.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.0 .
,
GuaNrailR air $ 10,000.09 $ 35,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ .
1
, ,
. ,
. ,
. 8 000
00
275 $ 000
00
100 $ 100
000
00 $ 200
000.00 $ 200,060.00 $ 315,000.00 $ 150,000.00
f
l
S
S $ 165
000
00 $ 00
200
000 $ 125,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 325,000.00 $ 550,000.00 .
, .
, ,
. , $ 00
000
300
ur
ace
ea
1.5" Oveda $ 300,000.00 $ ,
.
105,000.00 $ .
,
555,000.00 $ 465,000.00 $ 330,000.60 $ 350,000.00 $ 610,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ BOO,000.DO .
,
2"Mill and Oveda $ 175,000.00
375
00
000
$
00
55
006 $
$ 275,000.00
000
00
65
$
000
00
85
$
400
000.00
$
95,1100.00
8
95,000.60
$
95,000.00
$
95,000.00
$
95,060.00
$
95,000.00
$
95,000.00
$
110,000.00
$
110,000.00
$
110,000.00
Drama a Ire rovement $ 450,000.00 $ 75,006.00 $ ,
.
00
000 $ ,
.
00
15
000 $ .
,
00
30
000 $ ,
.
30
000
00 $ ,
30
000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00
00
0
Storm WaterMana emend $ 15,000.00 $ 30,006.00 $ 15,
. ,
. .
, ,
. ,
30
000
00 $ 000
00
30 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ .
30,00
Bdd a Ire rovement $ 15,000.00 $ 30,0.00 $ 30,000.00 $ ,
. .
,
Sub Total $ 915,400.00 $ 674,300.00 $ 930,600.00 $ 957,900.00 $ 1,060,900.00 $ 774,300.00 $ 1,011,200.00 $ 1,033,100.00 $ 871,500.00 $ 336,900.00 $ 1,259,300.00
0
00 $ 683,200.00
320
00
68 $
$ 452,100.00
210
45
00 $
$ 1,389,500.00
1311
950
00 $
$ 570,100.00
57
010
00 $
$ 707,700.00
770.00
70 $
$ 971,000.00
97,1110.00
10%Contin e $ 91,540,00 $ 67,430.00 $ 93,060.00 $ 95,790.00 $ 106,090.00 $ 77,430.00 $ 101,120.00 $ 163,310.00 $ 81,150.00
650
00
958 $ 33,690.00
370
00
590 $
$ .
125,93
00
230
1
385 $
$ .
,
520.00
751 S ,
.
497,310.00 ,
.
$ 1,528,450.00 ,
.
627,110.00 $ ,
718,470.00 S 1,066,100.00
TOTAL S 1,008,940.00 $ 741,730.00 S 1,023,660.00 1,053,890.00 $ 1,166,990.00 851,730.00 $ 1,112,320.00 ; 1,136,410.00 $ .
, ,
. .
,
, ,
TOTAL BUDGET ED S 1,007,000.00 $ 742,000.00 3 1,025,000.00 $ 1,055,000.00
Pavement Inspection
Data Cdlection/lntern
Stripping
Crack Seal
Aspahft Patching
Concrete Repair
Guardrail Repair
Surface Seal
1.5"Overlay
2"Mill and Overlay
Drainagelmprovement
Storm Water Management
Bridge Improvement
Lonp Term Capital Street Maintenance Budget
Bi-Annual Surface Pavement Inspection of all the Town Roads. This allows us to montior and evaluate road conditbns.
Collect and update GPS data i merrtory(Draiange, Street Lights, Signs, etc...)
Stripe all of the Town roads, once in the spring and once i n the fall
Seal cracks wthin all of the town roads. Towmvide every 5 years. Spot sealing every year.
Full depth and skin asphalt patches as needed throughoutthe taw n.
Concrete repairthoroghoulthetcwn.
Guardrail repair throughout the town.
Slurry and Chip seals on town roads as part of the towns pavement maintenance program .
Asphalt overlays on town roads as part of the Town's pavement maintenance program
Asphalt ovedays an town roads as part of the T oven's pavement maintenance program
Drainage Improvement projects throughout the tow n.
Maintenance of Stonn Sewer System, contract leaning, water qualihj improvement programs.
MirarBddge improvements as iderdified in the biannual bridge inspection reports.
Capital Facilities Maintenance Budget
Background:
Our main goal is to assure that the estimated life expectancies of our facilities are met or
exceeded in a fiscally responsible manner. We maintain 20 buildings and numerous other
facilities including parking structures, fountains, street lights, restrooms, bus shelters, and
lift stations owned by the Town of Vail. We strive to assure that they are safe, functional,
meet current codes including A..D.A.. requirements, and are aesthetically pleasing, at
least as far as they were first intended. We also aim to improve our facilities whenever
we do any work to them by making them more efficient, more functional, and more
environmentally friendly.
Currently, our major challenge is the fact that some of our buildings have attained or are
about to attain their estimated lifespan. We determine lifespan by assessing construction
type, year built, condition, and the qualityof the materials and equipment installed and
any renovations done to a facility. We have not provided for building replacement in
maintenance budgets as they are such large line items as to take up any discretionary
funding and are better addressed through other funding methods.
Required Maintenance:
Depending on the facility, we determine a facility's condition using one or more of the
following; structural and mechanical engineer assessment reports, systems testing,
problem histories, energy assessment reports, environmental assessment reports, visual
inspections and even user comments. Based on afore mentioned analysis we determine
maintenance needs. We have implemented a routine preventative maintenance program
which assures the continued day to day operation of all of our systems. Long term, we
also track large ticket items such as boilers, fire systems and roofs and attempt to spread
those costs out. However, as the buildings age more and more of these costly items will
require attention at the same time.
Future Needs:
As our facilities age, the rate of deterioration increases and our repairs become less
effective and more expensive. The fact that some of our facilities are still functional is a
testament to our maintenance program and employees. It is time to seriously consider
replacing buildings. Buildings near the end of their useful lives include the Municipal
Building, Fire Station II, Lionshead Auxiliary Building, Lionshead Information Center,
and Fire Station I. The Library is another building that will soon require such major
repairs and replacements that it would be prudent to consider a re-evaluation. On the
Recreation district side. The Golf Course Clubhouse and the Ford Park restrooms are in
need of replacing.
Buildings can be maintained for a very long time and are. Some of our buildings have
undergone major renovations which usually take place in the latter half of their life
expectancies. A major renovation extends the life expectancy of that facility beyond its
original design. It can include new roofs, windows, upgrading exterior/interior aesthetics,
~~
mechanical and electrical systems, bringing the building up to current building and
A.D.A. codes. Marty times, however, when a building is ready for a major renovation,
there are also functional problems with the space. The demands for space may have
outgrown the usefulness of it. At this point not only is the original building looked at
from a renovation point of view, but an addition to the building is evaluated. The
combination of major renovation and addition verses the possibility of tear down and
rebuild determines the course of action on whether to replace a building or not.
Future Wishlist:
We wish we had some new buildings.
VEHICLE PROCUREMENT AND REPLACEMENT PROCESS
Background:
In order to provide functional, cost-effective, environmentally friendly
vehicles/equipment to the Town of Vail, the Fleet Division utilizes a joint acquisition
process that involves the user department to determine what vehicles/equipment the
department needs to perform its job duties. Their needs should be clearly known and the
Fleet Division's responsibility is to identify. technology that can cost-effectively perform
that task. During this process, alternatives to ownership are explored, such as leasing,
renting or contracting the job out.
Life cycle costs for all vehicles/equipment are tracked utilizing a computerized cost
accounting system called Computerized Fleet Analysis (CFA). The most advantageous
replacement frequency is not a preset, inflexible interval in usage, years, or maintenance
cost. It is Fleet's goal to look at replacement of vehicleslequipment when the economic
life cycle, or Replacement Zone, of vehicles/equipment has been reached, or the
vehicle/equipment no longer meets the needs of the user department (functionally
obsolete). Fleet maintains a ten year vehicle replacement plan and when a vehicle or
piece of equipment has reached the Replacement Zone, as listed on the 10 year vehicle
replacement plan, it is evaluated and prioritized as to whether it gets replaced or deferred
or utilized within another function within the town.
The town utilizes an internal service fund to pay for replacement of vehicles during their
life. Fleet charges a monthly replacement fee to the user department for the
vehicles/equipment that the department utilizes and these monies accumulate in a Heavy
Equipment Fund (HEF). Through this internal service fund, the vehicle/equipment has
funded its replacement when it reaches the end of its life cycle.
Recycled or "re-used" units are vehicles or equipment that have completed their
economic life in one area of fleet application (such as Police) but are retained in the fleet
for lighter application or occasional usage. New units have replaced these vehicles in
their original uses. The Fleet Manager shall evaluate mechanical history, downtime
history and current condition to determine the feasibility of recycling.
Required Maintenance:
The town follows the recommended maintenance schedules that are provided with the
vehicles/equipment that are purchased. Performing the recommended maintenance on the
vehicles/equipment is important for many reasons:
• Reduces operating costs by minimizing major component failures.
• Reduces downtime due to unscheduled repairs.
• Required for Commercial vehicles, such as buses, by the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR).
• Minimizes our liability due to a failure that causes injury or property damage.
• Maintain the Vail Standards
~~
CFA and other technologies such as oil analysis, engine analyzers, and on-board
computer systems are utilized to provide a cost effective maintenance program.
Future Needs:
Fleet, in conjunction with the user departments, is looking at vehicles that use less fuel
and are environmentally friendly, such as Hybrid buses and cars, and downsizing vehicles
such as large SUV's to sedans or smaller SUV's.
Departments/divisions seeking to increase its fleet size must seek approval from the Fleet
manager, department director and town manager: Additional vehicles/equipment, if
approved, are included in the capital projects budget and the operating and replacement
charges are budgeted for in that department's general fund line item budget.
Town of Vail 800 MHz Radio Replacement Cycle
Project Description:
The town is currently using Motorola radios that will be ten years old at the time of the
proposed replacement in 2008. The current radio model is no longer in production and
should be phased out of public safety by 2010..The proposed radio replacement would
include amid-range radio for the public safety agencies and a lower grade radio for
transportation and public works. Generally, radio life cycle for public safety radio would
be five years and public works radios should be seven years.
Project Justification:
Having reliable and effective radio communications equipment is vital to ensuring the
operational stability of the public safety, public works and transportation services within
the Town of Vail. If not replaced on a regular schedule, the town's radio system users
will experience deteriorated communications, equipment storages and increased radio
maintenance cost. This lack of effective communications not only negatively impacts
town operations but may also become a life safety issue.
15-Year Capital Asset Management
(Millions)
RETT Fund Discretionary,
$50.8 , 2'0~
Capital Fund Discretionary,
$27.9 , 12%
Debt Service, g__._ , _
Capital Maintenance, $63.7 ,
27%
Capital Replacements, $70.4
30%
Funds Available for New/Discretionary Projects
s,ooo
6,000
4,000
2,000
(2,000)
(4,000)
(6,000}
^ Capital Projects Fund ^ Real Estate Transfer Fund ^ All Other Funds
town of Veil
Capdal Aeset Management
15-Year Projection
Revenue Available f« Caaibl Puraoeee
GenerelFund
Cepibl Project Fund
HEF Transfer From Otlrer Funds
Sales end Trade-its
Inc
Sales Tax 0.02
Federal Greets
Leases
Project Reimbursement
Eagle County Greet Revenue
Interest Income & Other
Capibl Project Fund
Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund
Real Estate Transfer Taz 3.0%
GoN Course Lease 2.5%
LoBery Revenue
Trensf« from GF
Reweatiorrel Amenity Fees 3.0%
Interest Income 8 081er 3.0%
Eermmked for Annual Maintenance and Landscaping 5.0%
Reel Eatete Trenaf« Tex Fund Total
Total Revsnue
Exoerrdficea f« Ceodal MaiMerrence
Bus Shelters
Parking SWckaes
Pmldng EgrripmeM Replacement
FadGBes
Em«emy Bullding Capital Maintenance
Capihil Street Maintenance
ADA CorrpGance
Street Light Improvements
fee Tmdc ReMdk!
Hybrid Bus BaBay Repacement
Computer SofbrerelHardware
Webstb and ecommerce
CADIRMS
Capial Projects Fund
Patls, Gwe Creek and Forest Health
Pbygrourrd Captial
Rec PathRreil Capital Maintenance
ADA Comp4ancewlVRD
Public Art
Reaeation FadGties
RETT Fund
Total Capial Memtenance
F*~+ndfieee fa Capital Replacement
Fumibue and Erpripment Less than $5,000 -General Fund
Heavy Equipment Replacements
Copier
MiG CreeklWillowlEast Vail
Vail Vegey Drive Recenstnction
East Vail Roads Reconstruction
MaBedam Bridge Reconstruction
Bridge Road Bridge RecaratrucGon
Nugget Lane 8ddge Reoorstruction
East & West Meadow Drive
East Meadow Drive Heat
Main Vail Flre Sbtian Renovation
Buildng Remodels
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
71,333 73,100 74,900 76A00 77,900 79,500 81,100 82,700 84A00 86,100 97,800 89,600 91A00 93,200 95,100 97,000
581
522 388
413 753
028 729
735 749,119 664,659 1,182,543 981,178 602,241 863,552 430,746 938,167 450,213 1,071,921 934,622 879,311
,
101880 ,
49330 ,
931110 ,
135 510 122 810 99640 247 760 172 410 84 210 115 370 96840 112120 66110 187430 131700 159 210
683,382 437,743 846,638 971,239 871,929 754,299 1A30,303 1,153,589 686A51 978,922 527,386 1,049,287 516,323 1,259,351 1,066,37! 1,038,521
400
349
6 217
776
6 840
633
6 6,886,000 7,018,560 7,191,400 7,367,040 7,514,800 7,665,000 7,818,000 7,974,000 8,
0 0
8 6,462,000 8,01;W
0 8,804,000
,
,
1,740,240 ,
,
811,800 ,
,
3,780,000 1,120,000 510,000 600,000 600,000
00
000
150
150
000
000
150
000
150 0
600,
000
150 0
600,
150,000
150,000 ~
150,000
150,000
150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,0 , , , , ,
895,468 27,000 - -
250,000
8T 000 -
19 000
16 000
11
000 .
17 000
20 000
20000
20 000
20000
ZO 000
20000
20000
20 000
20000
20 000
20 000
9A72,108 7,225,576 10,579,840 ,
8,167,000 7,695,560 7,961,400 8,137,040 7,684,800 7,835,000 7,988,000 9,144,000 8,903,000 9,066,000 8,632,000 9A01,000 8,974,000
000
6
000 200
000
5 770
000
6 000
5
600 5,000,000 5,250,000 5,408,000 6,570,000 5,737,000 5,909,000 6,086,000 6,269,000 6,457,000 6,651,000 6,851,000 7,057,000
,
,
115
956 ,
,
119
435 ,
,
018
123 ,
,
126,708 130,509 133,800 137,100 140,500 144,000 147,600 151,300 155,100 159,000 163,000 167,100 171,300
,
20
000 ,
000
20 ,
000
20 000
20 000
20 20,0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
, , , , , 10,762
10,762
000
360 000
125 125
000 25
000 25,000 25,000 25,800 26,606 27,400 28,200 29,000 29,900 30,600 31,700 32,700 33,700
,
82,300 ,
58,000 ,
57,000 ,
65,000 75,000 77,300
_. 79,800
.. -- .. _-. 82,000
.. °- ..., 84,500
,. „.~ ~,.,,, 87,000
,. Ma .,,,,,, 89,600
M MA mn\ 92,300
,~ ,u un~ 95,100
rr yea enm 98,000
n ~5 anm 100,900
r9 d73 4001 103,900
12.597.100)
15,417,850 11,887,273 17,083,807 13,506,781 1
1
14,470,587 14,
38,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 30,000 -
40
000 31,000
000
910 11,000
000
055
1 31,000
000
860 11,000
100
000
1 -
575,000 32,000
740,000 12,000
780,000 32,000
780,000 12,000
785,000
790,000
508,740 627,000 705,000 485,000 480,000 ,
5 , ,
, , ,
, 000
420
331
500 000
365 000
455 000
810 400,000
755,000 430,000 500,000 1,950,000 695,000 605,000 640,000 870,000 ,
635,000 620,000 695,000 780,000
, ,
25
000 ,
000
25 ,
25
000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
565
1
584 ,
1,006,940 ,
741,730 ,
1,023,660 1,053,690 1,168,990 851,730 1,112,320 1,136,410 958,650 370,590 1,385,230 751,520 491,310
000
15 1,528,450
000
15 627,110
15
000
,
, 10
000 000
10 10
000 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 , , ,
50,000 ,
50,000 ,
50,000 ,
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
. 60,000 60,000 60,000 80,000
• 250,000 - - - 80,000 294,000 - 88,400 91,000
140,488 58,000 72,000 43,000 52,000 75,000 45,000 55,000 80,000 48,000 58,000 83,000
5
000 50,000
23
OW 60,000
000
15 85,000
15
000 50,000
25
000
50,000 12,000 20,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 20,000 15,OOb 15,000
60000 20,000
BO 000 15,000
120 ~0 ,
1
62000 ,
82000 ,
82 000 ,
62000 ,
125000
186 290 50000 50000 50000
60 50000
917
690
2 100 000
990
2
408 40 000
730
482
2 60000
395
3'10
4 2,974,410 3,193,650 1,875,590 3,064,230 2,918,920 2,166,310 3,262,450 2,568,110
2,891,581 2,213,940 2,408,730 2,318,6 ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
597
816 430
000 580
065
1 480,378 492,402 509,074 520,946 533,025 545,315 551,825 575,560 1,893,526 601,732 615,185 833,890 647,857
,
2111,888 ,
425,000 ,
,
200,000 - -
000
605 100,000
500
577 -
000
857 -
000
40
41,200 -
42,436
43,709 -
45,020 200,000
48,371 250,000
47,762 -
49,195 500,000
50,671
352,118 520,000 970,000 1,020,000 , , , ,
50,000
187,419 50,000
75,000 50,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
80,000
80,000
60,000
80,000
80,000
65,000
85,000
85,000
85,000
85,000
90,000
50 000
1,700,020
1,500,000
2,360,580
1,515,378
1,172,402
1,266,574
1,257,946
653,02.5
668,515
680,261
704,269
2,023,548
933,103
997,947
768,085
1,288,528
4,591,601 3,713,940 4,769,310 3,994,038 4,090,092 3,675,564 3,740,6)6 5,048,345 3,640,925 3,873,911 2,679,859 5,107,776 3,850,023 3,164,257 4,050,535 3,676,638
71
333 100
73 74
900 400
78 77,900 79,500 81,100 82,700 84,400 88,100 87,600 89,600 91,400 93,200 95,100 97,000
,
519,920 ,
377,100 ,
731,095 ,
714,300 727,300 645,300 1,148,100 952,600 584,700 838,400 418,200 908,900 437,100 1,040,700 907,400 853,700
10,310 -
• 4,100,000 - -
. -
. - 1,500,000 - - - -
- 4,400,000 - - - - -
_ 1,000,000
_ - _ 1,300,000 - .
. - - 1,000,000 - - -
. - - - 2,800,000 - -
- - _ - - - 2,100,000
-
- 975,000
50,000 -
- -
55,000 -
-
61,000 -
- -
67,000 -
- -
74,000
- -
81,000 -
- -
- -
90,000
Tobl
63,667A90
CAM 1 9111200
Long-tens Capital Gina
Town of Veil
Capital Aeeet Management
15-Year Projection
Creekside Housing Improvements
Buaard Pads Housing Improvements
Gore Tank Upgrade CommuNca4ons
East Veil Interchange
Main Vail Improvements
Flre Truck Replacement
Flre BrealNng Apparehu
E Veil Rado Tower
800 Radio Equipment
Buses
Capital Projects Fund
RETT Fund -Street Fumihrre
Ford Perk Improvements
GoH Course & Clubhouse Improvements
Dobson Ice Arena
Tennis Center Improvements
Youth Services Improvements
Gymnastics Center
Native Center
Total Cepitel Repboemente
Debt Service end F'erenoina
Timber Ridge Loen
Timber Ridge Debt Service Guarentee
Debt Service on Outstanding Bonds
Debt Service and Financina
AveBabb AnnueOrfa NewlDbaetkmarv Profecb
Capital Projects Fund
Real Estate Trensfer Fund
Ap Other Furrds
Total AvaBabb AnmreOy
DbaeOorrerl4New Projeob Included in F'nrsYeer Plan
Doasnent Imaging
Patrol Car Video Cameras
Fro Tnx9r
VeNde E>~ension
Fire infresEucdse Improvements
Flber Optics in Buildings
Donovan Park Pavilion
Mule-Purpose ReaeaBon Fadily
West 8 East Meadow (hive
East Meadow DriveStreetscapeHaat
Vipege Streetscape
Buydown Program
Lionshead Improvements
Intermodal Slte
Revise TOV Master Plans
I-70 Noise
Way Boding Improvements
Stream Treat Incursion Survey
WNte Water ParklPromenage Bridge
IJonshead Perk
Booth Creek Redeveloprtrent
Fad Park Master Paln Irt~rovements
ViOege Streetscwpe (RETT)
Meadow Drive (RETT)
DiecretionerylNew Projects Not Yet Included
Flre Trudr AddBon
Inc 2005 2006
5,000
25,000 30,000
2007 2008 2009
5,000 5,000 5,000
4!15,000 - -
2010
60,000
5,000
25,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 Total
500,000 250,000 - 300,000 - -
_ - - - - 350,000 550,000 -
8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
- - - - 1,000,000
• 1,000,000 - - -
546,000 - 596,500 - - - 109,000 -
6,000 6,000 693,000 99,000 99,000 99,000
2 699 980 501000 - 3 854 200 143400 2199600 1,203,400
2,735,290 542,000 1,521,000 4,552,200 2802,400 7,488,600 8,817,400
37
030 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000
, 262,500 - - - 54,000
220,000 463,750 468,900 100,000 252,541 350,000
- 77,20D 700,000 45,000 80,000
56,000 61,625 - - 80,000, -
30,000 - - - -
- - - 75,000
- - - 140,000 -
3,363,573 1,585,700 2,897,370 5,914,000 4A32,600 8,760,941 8,635,600
000
147 99,000 99,000 99,000 155,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 163,000
, 3502400 3465600 5495170 204455
000
405 1,114,000 1,003,500 1,481,000 3,667,400 3,569,600 104,000 5,599,170 367,455
,
30,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000
350,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 240,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
70,000 - - - .
-
- 527,D00 - - - - -
20,000 - 175,000 - - - - - -
1,910,300 2,660,100 2,293,000 2,182,000 4,940,900 7,12A,100 1,732,900 7,405,670 4,658,155
700,000 - - - -
925,000
2,422,154
2,236,200
2,322,497
2,321,825 -
2,320,363
2,317,803
2,323,004
2,124,692
4,047,154 2,236,200 2,322097 2,321,825 2,320,363 2,317,3 2,323,004 2,124,692 - - - - -
(201,917) 2,233,436 4,327,613 (1,025,685) (344,893) (4,253,993) (3,486,094) 759,786 3,686,590 3,790,850
3 4,787,410
3 2,151,370
2 2,579,480
3 5 6,361,690
3 519,38D
3 6,018,435
3
~
3~15 2~6
~ 1
3 2 2 2 2
82 3200 988 3101,681 140 522 09186 139387 79223 218 651 156 922 18482
63
462 843
60 5543
1 158 939 144 629 08 999 203
2
3,415,522 4,899,933 7,640,005 1,922,998 2,334,383 (1,529,868) (495,437) 4,359,051 7,259,028 7,474,911 8,498,327 4,681,911 6,209,100 10,155,494 4,573,517 9,874,290
• 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
45,000 - - -
- 735,000 - -
40,300 - - - .
270,63ri 2,500,000 725,000 - -
90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
42,0 - - '
88,000 - - - -
199,360 900,000 950,000 1,320,000 -
- 965,000 1,025,000 - -
2,419,615 1,535,300 -
200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
313,955 - -
- 3,750,000 -
10D,000 - - - - - - - -
528,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 - -
79,284 - - -
35,000
250,000
100,000 690,000
250,000
1,000,000 1,000,000 1,OD0,000
2,300,000 1,250,000
25,000 1,025,000 800,000 1,080,000
- - - 535,000 - - - - - - - - - -
70,396,909
20,013,539
27,903080
50,783,834
2,365,869
81,053,163
9!1!200
CAM 2
Long-tens Capital Gina
Town of Ve0
Capital Asset Management
15•Year Projection
Inc 2005 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
E. Vail Flre StaBon • Nex Bay 775,000 -
Library Remodel (ndudes 3rd tbor) - 5,750,000 - -
TovmShop Master Plan Improvements - - - 5,650,000 - '
WestUellFlreStation - - 1,430,000 - -
LH Aratl6ary Bwlding Renovation - - 875,000 - -
InformatlonCenter Rerave8on - - - 550,000 - - '
Munidpal Buildng Renovation - - - 2,400,000 - -
Simba Run Undrpass - - - - 12,000,ODO
- '
815
000
S. Frontage Road -Lionshead - - 5,000,000 - - - - ,
000
570
S. Frontage Road -Ford Perk - - 4,000,000
- -
- - 2,000,000 ,
S. Frontage Road • East Vail - - - 000
000
2 -
N. Frontage Road - West Va(I - - - - ,
, 1'000'000
N. Frontage Road • Sandstone - - - - - - - 500,000
GIS
TownWldeVideoSeauily 350,000 350,000 350,000 25,000 -
25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Master plan Updates - - - 50,000 58,000 - - 65,000
Intermodel Site (LionsHead Improvements-TIF) 10,000,000
LionsHead Streetscepes 5,000,000
Vail Vatley DrlveNeil Road
Forest Heallh
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000 2'000'000
250,000
250,000 250,000
250,000
Major Building Projeeb:
LionsHead Irdo Boolh
LlcnsHead AmdGary Brdidng
LioraHead Perking Shudure
Creeksfde Employee Housing
Munidpal BuOding Replacement
GoH Couse Clubiwuse
Nahae Center
Fad Park Atldetio Fleld Restraom
New BuOdings:
Youth Center .,
ReaeeBon Center
Vitlage Lowing FadSty
Perking Sbudare E~ansion
Perfomdrrg Arts Center
Conference Center
2017 2018 2019 2020
- - 75,000 -
Total
Long-tens Capital Gina CAM 3 9111200:
..~
/ r „ \ 1 ~ CtY~'
I
'.~~ _• _
~E
~!" 11:33sgft ~ r,~~ ~ CREF .
-- ~
__-
r~_ ~ ~~,r,,~ - 9}sgtt';,°~ ~ 33sgft w
~_ ~
72sgft ~ $ ~ -y 554s ft _-~"___,~-
q
~,__ ; 517sgft ~ ___ ~` ~ ~ V
1 1 sgft •'~{ ~
28s ft ' °'' ~ x
q ~, w
~~ A w
~ ~ ~~ 19sgft ; ~~j ea FBI
i ; ~ ,,
~ ~ ~ 28sgft `' oC ~
~ ~'I}
\ MILL CREEK COURT q
BUILDING 33sgft oooR ' `' " u
~ 1O9sgft p~j
~ ` " ~ oG
1O3sgft ~ ~ U
37sgft ~ / ..-- - l ~ a
181 sgft / ~ ,, ~ '" ~I
~ 94sgft ~ ',
187sgft ~~ ~ ~ y" ~~~~
1 353sgft ,;, / 1~1
198sgft o--~ '"~ ~~ ~ ~
OP ~~~~Yr
y ~~.
~ ~ } ~ ,
~~~ RAMP, PLANTERS, AND WALLS (TOV) ~• •~•~~ `-
~ ! ~ - 2298 sgft ~~ 26sgft ~ ` /r ~ ~ ~ ~ °Y
ACCESSABLE SURFACE (TOV) 1 ``yam h/ . ~...
~__. __. 735 sgft 124sgft ~ .: _
~~ ~ j./" ~OP9 Ar^ Hari
~~ff----~ RAMPS, PLANTERS, AND WALLS (MCC) '' j ~ _d~ 1'~
E ::.....~ - 224 sgft ~ ~~ ~ / ~~' ~~ i - ~ , ;max
WALKABLE SURFACE (MCC) + "`,~:y~j~ ~" ~~ ~ yi ~ ~ ~ ~
- 1924 sgft ~, + ~ ' ~; ` , ~.~~ ''~ \
0 5 10 20
~~
NONM SCALE: 1'10'-0'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Conference Center Advisory Committee 8~ Town Staff
DATE: September 6, 2005
SUBJECT: Conference Center Ballot Decision
Staff: Russell Forrest
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this discussion on the conference center is to brief Council on the
Guaranteed Maximum Price for the conference center and to request input on the
ballot language to put forward to voters on November 8, 2005. Two items are
scheduled for the September 6th Town Council meeting regarding the conference
center:
An afternoon worksession to review the guaranteed maximum price for the
facility and the Committee's recommendation for managing the debt
service of the project. Staff would also appreciate any input on the
proposed ballot language in Resolution 16 and the proposed language in
Resolution 17 which provides a trigger mechanism for initiating up to a
1.5% lodging tax for the operation and construction of the conference
center.
An evening meeting to approve, disapprove, or modify:
A) Resolution 16, Series of 2005 which sets forth language to have a
ballot measure on the November 8th election which would ask voters to
increase the lodging tax for the conference center, and
B) Resolution 17, Series of 2005 which would state the Town Council's
intent on collecting up to 1.5% of new lodging tax for the conference
center.
2. BACKGROUND
On April 20, 2004, the Council authorized a series of next steps which included
interviewing owner's representative firms for the conference center. On April 29,
2004, the conference center advisory committee (Committee) met to interview five
owner's representative firms.
On May 18, 2004, the Council authorized the town manager to execute a contract
with Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. to be the Town of Vail's (Town)
owner's representative and funding for the first phase of this contract or $8,510.
The Council also authorized the Committee to negotiate with both Piper Jaffray
and Kirtpatrick Pettis to be the Town's investment banker on this project.
On June 1, 2004, the Council voted to approve the following requests from the
Committee:
• Authorization to engage Piper Jaffray as the Town's investment banker for the
conference center;
• authorization to issue a request for qualifications (RFQ) for design team
assistance on the conference center;
• .request to move forward with a negotiated guaranteed maximum price (GMP)
process for engaging a design team and a general contractor (as opposed to a
design build process). This essentially means that both the architect and
general contractor will work for the Town;
• request for the Council to approve the next phase of an owner's representative
contract. The preconstruction phase of the contract would cost up to
$155,774. However, the Committee is only requesting $93,212 (includes fees
and reimbursables) to fund this function until a decision is made by the Council
to issue bonds which is anticipated in the November/December 2004 time
frame.
On June 15, 2004, the Council reviewed and approved the following next steps:
• Approval of the proposed process for engaging the public in the design team
selection process;
• selection criteria for request for proposals;
• consideration of proposed process givens;
• review of updated project budget and interrelated parking costs; and
• consideration and review of the major points of the proposed scope of service
request for proposals for design services (to be given to the top 3-4 teams
selected in the qualification competition).
On July 6, 2004, the Council reviewed and approved the following next steps:
Review the recommendation -from the Committee on short-listing the design
team candidates and to issue the request for proposals (RFP) to the six
recommended design teams;
review and approve suggested changes to the design team selection process
from the Committee; and
request permission to issue an RFP for a surveyor to survey the Lionshead
parking structure site and surrounding area.
On July 20, 2004, the Council unanimously approved the following:
• A contract for design services with Fentress Bradburn; and
• approval of next steps for master planning the Lionshead parking
structure/conference center site.
On September 21, 2004, the Council, the Committee, Design Review Board (DRB)
and Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) reviewed five alternative site
plans. In addition, the public reviewed the same alternatives on September 22,
2004. The near unanimous opinion from the various groups that reviewed the site
plans was that alternative three is the preferred choice.
On October 19, .2004, the Council met and reviewed an update on architectural
images for the conference center and authorized the Committee to move forward
with public discussions regarding the alternative styles.
The Committee met on October 21, 2004, and reviewed the qualifications
submitted by six general contractors. After reviewing the qualifications, the
Committee recommended to the Council that three general contractors receive
requests for proposals (RFP}. Those general contractors include:
^ Hansel Phelps Construction
^ Hunt Construction Group/Hyder Construction
^ M.A Mortenson Company
On November 2, 2004, the Council approved a motion to forward the above
mentioned contractors RFPs.
The design team of Fentress Bradburn developed three alternative architectural
approaches. These images were not the elevations of the proposed conference
center but rather provided alternative visions or inspirations that could be
considered for the conference center. The three styles include:
^ Bavarian/Traditional Vail style
^ Contemporary
^ Natural/Environmentally inspired style
The Committee reviewed the public input associated with the three design
alternatives on November 18, 2004. After reviewing the public input and the
associated costs with each design option, the Committee forwarded a
recommendation for the "architectural vision inspired by nature." The Committee
felt that this would create an outstanding architectural structure. The materials as
envisioned by the design team would utilize "mountain" materials such as heavy
stone and timbers. The roof element would be more iconic but is intended to
reflect the form of the surrounding mountains. It should also be noted that one
member of the Committee, although not present on November 18, 2004, preferred
the traditional.Vail vernacular look. On December 7, 2004, the Council voted 6-1
to direct the conference center design team to move forward with a
"natural/environmentally inspired" design style.
The Committee met on December 14, 2004, and voted to recommend that the
Town purchase (using conference center funds) the water and sewer taps for the
charter bus lot site. On December 21, 2004 the Council authorized that the Town
purchase tap fees with the condition that the Eagle River Water and Sanitation
District (District) provide a letter confirming that a tap fees could be used on the
same site for a different use in the future and that the tap fees could be moved to
another Town owned land. The District did provide a letter confirming this issue
referencing the District's policies for doing tap transfers. The final cost of the tap
fee was $297,896.
On January 18, 2005, the Council voted to continue to move in the direction of the
"natural" design. The Council did express concern about the roof of the facility.
Furthermore, they asked that the design team develop alternative ideas for the
roof of the facility.
On March 15, 2005, the Council received an update on the operational plan,
design, and capital budget for the conference center. The Committee also
forwarded a recommendation to the Council to issue an RFP for operations,
management, and marketing. In addition, the Committee recommended
forwarding the design to the general contractors for pricing. The Council approved
both recommendations.
On March 17, 2005 the Council received a comprehensive update on the critical
elements of the conference center. In addition, they considered three basis
alternatives for the conference center. These alternatives included:
Option A: Discontinue all work and expenditures on the project:
If the Council is fundamentally uncomfortable with the risks associated with
the project, then discontinuing all work on the project is a viable alternative.
A future discussion would then be required regarding the disposition of
existing funds co-lected for the conference center and how the dedicated
lodging and sales tax for the conference center is addressed.
Option B: Implement the existing program and obtain additional revenue to
pay for the budget overage.
The current project design can not be built with the funds available today
and budget parameters that limit debt service at $2.7 million per year.
Option B involves bringing ballot language forward to the Council in August
of 2005 and keeping the same basic design
Option C: Reduce the cost of the facility and work within the existing
revenue budget for the project.
This option involves reducing the cost of the existing facility by cutting the
size and scope of the facility. Staff recommends not cutting the facility to
below 32,000 sq. feet meeting space based on the HVS study.
After significant public input and Council deliberation, the Council directed staff to:
Implement option B which involved moving forward with the existing
program while reducing costs to the reasonable extent possible. This step
involves moving forward with the existing design and reviewing it with Town
boards. In addition, Council directed staff to develop ballot language that
would not only provide additional revenue for the construction of the facility
but also an additional $1.5 million per year over and above annual debt
service to pay for operational deficits.
4
4. SUMMARY OF EXISTING REVENUE AND CONSTRAINTS FROM THE
2002 ELECTION
The current project financing through bonds is subject to several
constraints, some of which place significant interest rate risk on the ability
to use municipal bonds to meet the complete funding requirements of the
project. The first set of constraints is based on the ballot question
approved by voters in 2002. Listed below is a summary of these 2002
ballot created parameters:
Bond Summary
• Maximum Principal amount $50,060,000.
• Maximum Annual Town Repayment Cost $3,830,000.
• Maximum Total Town Repayment Cost $95,610,000.
• No specified term limit on bonds.
Tax Summary
• Levy of a Town lodging tax at 1.50%.
• Increase of Town sales tax by 0.50% to a total Town sales tax of
4.50%.
• Sales and lodging tax terminate when the debt is paid in full.
The second set of constraints placed on the bonds is related to the ability
to sell the bonds. in a cost effective manner. If the debt can be structured
so that the bond issue receives an investment grade rating from the
national rating agencies (i.e. Standard & Poor's and Moody's) then the
town may be able to secure an insurance commitment from a national
municipal bond insurer. Issuing the bonds under this structure could
substantially lower the borrowing costs to the Town. When the bond issue
is presented to the rating agencies they will look at several factors including
the debt coverage ratio of the revenue stream to. the debt service. When
the rating agencies look at municipal bonds they typically look for at least
1.20 times minimum coverage for investment grade ratings (coverage =
annual revenue -operating and maintenance expenses _ annual debt
service). Based on the revenue projections provided to the Town of Vail.
the new annual debt service will need to be $2,700,000 or less in order to
achieve a 1.20 times debt service coverage ratio.
Since the amount of annual debt service that can be paid is limited by
these constraints, the factor that changes are moves in interest rates. The
percent changes the amount of project funds that debt service can support.
For example, when interest rates increase, more of the annual debt service
must be used for interest, thus limiting the principal that can be repaid.
Since the bonds were initially approved in 2002 the interest rate
environment has gradually risen. While rates have recently decreased
slightly there still has been an upward trend and based on comments and
actions of the Federal Reserve many market participants expect this trend
to continue. Displayed in the graph below is the history of the 10-year U.S. _
Treasury from 1/1/03 through 5/6/05.
10-Year U:S. Treasury Note
(January 2003 to May 2005)
5.00 ... ......... ......... ......... ...... ........................................ ...... ......... ........ ......................
4.80 .. ......... ......... ......... ...... ................................ ... .:.... ........ ......................
4.60 ... ......... ......... ......... ..... .......:.............................. ... ......... ........ .....................
4.40 .. ......... ...:..... ...... ............. ....... ..... ...... ......... ..........
... 4.20 ... ......... ......... ........ ...... ......... :.....: ............ ...... .. .... .... . . .... .. .........
0
v_ 4.00 ..... ......... .. ...... ................ .... ......... ...... ..... .... ....................
d
} 3.80 ... ..... . ........ ..... .. ...... ...................................... ...... ......... ......... .....................
3.60 ... ...:..... ..... .. ........ ...... ........................................ ...... ......... ......... .....................
3.40 ... ......... ........ .. ..... ...... ........................................ ...... ......... ......... .....................
3.20 ... ......... ......... ....... ...... ..............................:......... ...... ......... ......... .....................
3.00
M
O M
O M
O M
O M
O M- ~. a ~
O O O O ~
O ~
O ~
O M In
O O
O
N O
N O
~V O
~V O
N O O O O
N N N N O
C`V O
~V O
~V O O
N N
M M M M M f` f` ~ CM C` M M M C\ M
r M In f~ W ~ M O h W r Cq
5. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
A. Review of the Guaranteed Maximum Price
Mortenson Construction has received subcontractor bids for the
existing design of the facility. They will have provided a signed
Guaranteed Maximum Price contract by the Town Council meeting
September 6th to build the conference center and 320 parking spaces
for $ 53,376,740, subject to Town of Vail execution after the election.
This price will remain valid through April 1, 2006, and includes
preconstruction services already authorized by Town Council for work
through the election of $54,000. .
The following table summarizes the current costs:
Description 06-Sep-05
Construciton Cost $ 53,376,740
Soft Cost $ 4,700,000
FF&E $ 525,000
Housing $ 1,845,000
Contingenc $ 4,326,125.
Total $ 64,772,865
6
The total project budget of $64,722,865 includes the 125 spaces Vail
Resorts is paying $4.3 million to construct under the conference
center. If $4.3 million is backed out of the total cost the Town of Vail is
financing, the grand total of the project is then reduced to $ 60,472,865.
Attachment A is a PDF of a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the
costs associated with the conference center.
B. Review Options for paving for the Guaranteed Maximum Price and the
Operational Deficit and associated Cash Flow Models.
Attachment 6 summarizes the associated lodging tax to pay for the
conference center. The Conference Center Advisory Committee met
on August 31 Sc and recommended the following:
• The Committee assumed that the $4.3 million would be
accepted by the Vail Town Council to help pay for parking.
This would then bring the total project cost to $ 60,472,865.
• $3 million would be used from the cash fund balance of the
project, which is estimated to be close to $10 million by the
end of 2005, to reduce the amount financed from $60,
472,865 to $57,472,865. The average annual debt service
on $57,472,865 at today's interest rate plus 50 basis points
(1/2 of 1%) is $3,707.221.
• If approved a .79% lodging tax would be initiated
effective January 1, 2006, and the Town Council would
have the discretion to initiate another .71 % lodging tax
if the total cash fund balance was reduced below
$5,000,000.
• The .79% incremental lodging tax, along with the
current conference center taxes, will provide the
amount of the average annual debt service plus 20% of
that amount to equal a 1.2 times debt service coverage
ratio, which expected to be required when the bonds
are issued. Since the 20% coverage is not cash
needed to repay the debt, it will be available to pay for
operational costs. The amount available from this
source for operations is $741,444.
• The additional incremental .71 % lodging tax that the
Council could collect would generate another $824,000
.per year for an operational deficit. With a full 1.5% .
collection a total of $1,565,444 is available for paying for
an operational deficit and grows over time.
• The cash fund balance is not projected to go below
$5,000,000 under this scenario. See attachment C for
pro-formas for the project assuming the additional
operating tax is not needed and another that assumes
the full 1.5% is collected.
C. Ballot Language: Resolution #16, Series of 2005
Resolution 16, Series of 2005, would submit to the electors of the
Town at the regular municipal election to be held on November 8, 2005,
a ballot issue concerning the issuance of bonds and an increase in
lodging taxes to finance the conference center (Attachment D). The key
points of the ballot language include:
• Authorization to collect 1.5% in Lodging Tax.
• Council can increase (up to 1.5%) or decrease the tax if
needed. .
• If the ballot initiative fails, the authorization for collecting the
conference center lodging and sales tax from the 2002 ballot
would be terminated.
• If approved, the lodging tax from 2002 and the new lodging tax
would not sunset.
D. Resolution 17, Series of 2005: Trigger for Lodging Tax
Resolution 17, Series of 2005 is a resolution expressing the intention of
the Town Council with respect to the implementation of the lodging tax
which is being submitted to the electors of the Town at the regular
municipal election to be held on November 8, 2005 (Attachment E). The
resolution also expressed the intention of the Council that no revenues
of the Town will be used to support the conference center other than
the lodging tax being submitted at the November 8, 2005 election, the
lodging tax and sales tax levied pursuant to Question 2B (approved at
the 2002 election), and the revenues derived from the operation of the
conference center. This resolution essentially articulates the trigger for
initiating up to 1.5% in lodging tax as discussed above is section 5.B.
E. Parkin
Af the last meeting of the Town Council on August 15th, the Town
Council reviewed the material below and choose to defer this decision
to September 6th. It is now critical to decide whether to use the $4.3
million offered by Vail Resorts for parking under the conference center
so that the ballot language can be written accurately.
Site Selection in 2003
In November 2002, a ballot was approved in the Town to establish a
dedicated lodging and sales tax for the purposes of building and
operating a conference center. The proposed site at the time was the
Vail Resorts owned Holy Cross maintenance facility site. In 2003, Vail
Resorts began to actively plan for the redevelopment of Lionshead and
realized that the Holy Cross site was a critical site for their own
employee parking. Vail Resorts offered the Town $4.3 million for public
parking if an alternative site was selected for the conference center.
This value of $4.3 million was the approximate value of Vail Resorts
cost to relocate its maintenance facilities. The Vail Town Council
evaluated the pros and cons of locating the conference facility at the
charter bus site and the Holy Cross site. It was concluded by the
Council that the most appropriate site was the charter bus site. This
site would allow new parking to be developed with the conference
center to be utilized with the existing 1100 parking spaces to optimize
parking for the conference center and the general public.
Zonino and PEC Input
The site is zoned General Use which allows the flexibility in determining
the development parameters for the site. At the Julj+ 25th PEC meeting,
the commission indicated that the conference center should provide
243 spaces for parking. This parking space number is based on the
zoning code requirement in section 12-10-10 which provides a parking
schedule for "theaters, meeting rooms, and conference facilities" at a
ratio of 1.O space per 165 sq. ft. of conference facility seating floor area.
The project currently has 320 parking spaces with 250 net new spaces.
Seventy parking spaces are displaced on the existing parking structure
due to the relocation of the entrance. The parking would be managed
and operated by the Town. The existing 1100 spaces and the new 250
spaces would be operated as one public parking facility.
Parking Study
Felsburg Holt and Ullevig working on behalf of the Town of Vail Public
Works Department prepared a parking analysis based on HVS' use
projections. They evaluated an extreme parking scenario of a
conference and evening event occurring in the winter at the same time
as a peak ski day. The frequency of this type of event would be one
time every 2-3 years. This is the only scenario which would place more
parking on the Frortage Road. They also used a design day of a 90tH
percentile event occurring during the day and in the evening per the
HVS study which would simulate events occurring during a day that the
Frontage Road would be used for parking. On all other days, except for
the extreme event occurring once every 2-3 years, the 250 parking
spaces built under the conference center would reduce the frequency of
parking on the Frontage Road.
If an event occurred on a peak ski day then there would be the ability to
segregate or reserve parking for the conference facility. Staff proposed
only segregating 125 spaces during times when the facility is used and
frontage road parking is anticipated. .The conclusion was that 125
parking spaces would be adequate to maintain parking for the
conference center on a peak ski day. The 125 space addition is felt to.
be adequate because peak conference center events will not take place
during the day-time in the winter when parking is most critical for skiers.
It was also concluded that providing a total of 250 spaces would reduce
both the total number of car days on the-Frontage Road by 7000 to
8000 per season and reduce the number of days on the Frontage Road
by approximately 10.days while providing adequate parking for the
conference center (See Attachment F). Again the premise behind
locating the conference facility at the charter bus lot is that very few (5
conferences) conferences are anticipated in the winter months during
the day and that any parking created for the conference center would
be available for public parking when it is most needed. In the summer
and shoulder seasons when there is significant capacity in the
Lionshead parking structure in the day, the conference center would
benefit from additional parking which the existing parking structure
provides.
Specific Action Requested of the Council
The parking cost of this project is a critical component of the overall
budget. Staff would like to propose that we comply with zoning by
building 250 net new parking spaces. Vail Resorts has committed $4.3
million for parking under the conference center. Staff would propose
that we comply with the PEC request to provide 243 spaces. The
primary question is whether Vail Resorts funding should be accepted to
help pay for the proposed parking underneath the parking structure.
The alternative would be to increase the amount of the project budget
for the conference center an additional $4.3 million to pay for the full
total of 250 net new parking spaces. Vail Resorts has indicated
verbally they are still willing to commit $4.3 million in parking even if it is
helping to satisfy the conference centers parking requirement as long
as it is available for public parking when not needed for a conference
center use.
Impact if $4.3 million is not accepted
If the 4.3 million is not accepted for use under the conference center
then the amount the Town would need to finance would be
$61,772,865. The total debt service on this amount is $3,984,588 and
the minimum lodging tax to cover the debt service at a 1.2 coverage is
1.08% versus .79%. If the total authorization was maintained at 1.5%
this would also reduce the amount of funds available to offset an
operational loss.
6. NEXT STEPS
The following are critical next steps in the conference center process
• September 7`h: Council will. be asked to consider a resolution to place a
ballot initiative on the November 2005 ballot
• PEC DRB decisions in September and October of 2005. Note: PEC may
still put requirement or conditions on the project or potentially not approve
the project and thus require an appeal to Council.
• November 8th: Election
io
Attachments
A. Powerpoint Presentation on the Guaranteed Maximum Price
B. Funding Summary
C. Pro Formas for Funding Summary
D. Resolution 16, Series of 2005: Ballot Language
E. Resolution 17, Series of 2005: Trigger threshold for Lodging Tax
F. Parking Analysis from FHU
F:\cdev\COUNCIL\MEMOS\05\conference center081605.doc
11
Attachment A
Powerpoint Presentation on the Guaranteed
Maximum Price
Attachment B
Funding Summary
Vail Conference Center
Proposal as of September 1, 2005
Total Project Costs
Vail Resorts Parking Contribution
Town Costs
Reserve Fund Contribution
Amount Financed
Average Annual Debt Service
New Tax New Tax
for Debt Service at Maximum
Only 1.5%
$ 64,772,866 $ 64,772,866
4,300,000 4,300,000
60,472,866 60,472,866
3,000,000 3,000,000
$ 57,472,866 $ 57,472,866
$ 3,707,221 $ 3,707,221
Incremental Lodging Tax For Debt Service (including 1.2 X coverage) 0.787% 0.787%
Incremental Lodging Tax to Reach 1.5% 0.713%
Total Incremental Lodging Tax 0.787% 1.500%
Total Tax Rate on Lodging (includes TOV, county,state, VLMD) 12.59% 13.30%
Operating Deficit -First Year of Operations $ 1,325,483 $ 1,325,483
Net Cash Flow -First Year of Operations $ (455,199) $ 396,171
Fund Balance Available 12/31/05 $ 6,907,090 $ 6,907,090
Fund Balance Available 12/31/07 $ 6,883,098 $ 8,499,773
Fund Balance Available 12/31/12 $ 6,252,878 $ 12,432,448
Fund Balance Available 12/31/35 $ 24,628,260 $ 63,957,085
Assumptions:
Sales and Lodging Tax Projections per Bernstein and Associates through 2012; inflated 2% thereafter
$4.3 million contribution from Vail Resorts for parking received December 2005
Debt service per Piper Jaffray 09/01/05
Operating losses per HVS
Capital maintenance fund included in cash flow per HVS
Pre-operating marketing costs of $1.5 million included in cash flow; not reimbursed from bond proceeds
Town of Vail management fee of 5% included in cash flow
050906 Town Council 9/1/05
Attachment C
Pro Formas for Funding Summary
TOWN OF VAIL
REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -1.5 % NEW TAX
2003
Actual 2001
Actual 200$
Projection
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2071
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Project Costs and Financing Total Pro ed
Bontl Proceeds 57,700,000 - 57,700,000 - - - -
Costsoflssuance ~ (1,644,631) - (1,644,631) - - - - - ,
Interest on Investment of Bond Proceeds 1,417,497 1,166,639 249,102 1,756 - -
Ne[ Cash Proceeds from Bonds 57,472,868 ~ - 57,222.000 249,702 1,756 - -
Vail Resorts 4,300,000 4,300,000
Transfer from funtl balance ~ 3,000,000 3,000,000
Total Financing 64,772,866 - 64,522,0% 249,102 1,758 -
Capital Protect Costs .64,772,866 768,786 2,199,134. 39,931,916 21,287,171 573,915 -
Financing Over (Under) Project Cosh 0 ~ (7%,788) 62.322,674 (39.682,816) (21,279.355) (573,915)
OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE _
Revenue from Taxes and Interest
Sales Tax
1
703
864
1
828
234
700
1
805
828
1
900 ~
1
844,800
7,894,700
1,944,500
1,977,400
2,010,300
2,043,200
2,084,100
2,125,800
2,168,300
2,211,700
2,255,900
2,301,000
Public ACCOmotlations Tax ,
,
1
573
289 ,
,
7
730
378 ,
,
1
733
500 ,
,
1
755
600 ,
771
100
7 1,818,900 1,866,800 1,898,400 1,929,900 1,%7,500 2,000,700 2,040,700 2,081,500 2,123,100 2,185,600 2,208.900
Additional Public ACCOmodaOOns Tas• ,
,
1.500% ,
, ,
, ,
,
1,755,800 ,
,
1,771.100 1,818,800 1,866,800 1,898,400 1,929,900 1,961,500 2,000.700 2,040,700 2,081.500 2,123,100 2,165,600 - 2.208,900
Penalties and Interest on Delinquent Taxes
Total Conference Center Taxes 4,5%
751
3
281 8,458
3
567
070
3
539
200
5
340
500
387,000
5
5,532,500
5,678,100
5,774,200
5,870,100
5,%6,200
6,085,500
8,207,200
6,331,300
6,457,900
6,587,100
6,718,800
0
Interest on Fund Balance ,
,
18,824 ,
,
67,603 ,
,
118,000 ,
,
155,000 ,
167,000 173,000 187,000 192,000 205.000 220,000 236,000
321
500
6 253,000
460
200
6 270,000
601
300
6 269.000
900
6
746 309.000
896,100
6 329,00
7,047,800
Total Revenue 3,300,575 3,634,673 3,655,200 ~ 5,495,500 5,554,000 5,705,500 5,859,100 5,%6.200 6,075,100 6,186,200 ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
Operetlng Expendlturas
Conference Center Operotbns per HVS
375
000
1,125,000
1,285,483
7,135,053
7,045,980
1.006,104
984,645
1,014,200
1,D44,600
1,075,900
1,708,200
1,741,400
1,175,600
000
00
Transfer to Capital Maintenance Fund , 40,000 70,000 80.000 100,000 735,000 220,000 250.000 275,000
85 300,000
895
322 350,000
329
355 4
,
940
335
Town of Vail Management Fee 5.0% 169,599 180,394 178,960 287,025 269,350 270,625 283,905 288,710 293,505 2%,310 304,275 310,360 318,5 , , ,
Professional an0 Design Fees / Mtg expense 104,438 2,fi% 49271 3,000
~ 3,000 -
1
602
108 -
958
1
488
890
1
414
609
1
399
417
955
1
1,538,475
1,604,960
1,667,465
1,731,095
1,820,755
1.971.540
Total Operetlng Expenditures 274,037 183,090 226.231 845,025 1.397.350 ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
Debt Service 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707.221 3,707,221 .3,707,221 3,707,221 3.707,221 3,707,221
Total Expandituree for Operatlons and Debt Service 274,037 183.090 226,231 4,352,248 5,104,571 5,309,329 5,1%179 5,121,911 5,108,830 5,725,178 5,245,6% 5,312,181 5,374,688 5,438,316 5,527,978 5,678,761
Revenue Over (Under) Operafing Expenditures And OaDI
Servlu 3,028,538
3,451,583
3,428,%9
1,143,254
449,429
3%,171
662,921
844.289
%8,270
1,061,024
1,075,604
~ 1,148,019
1.226,674
1,308,584
1,368,124
1,429,039
Revenue Ovar (Under) Expenditures Including ProJact
38
53
928
20
829
744)
(177
662
921
844
289
968,270
1,081,024
1,075,804
7.148,079
1,228,814
1,308.584
1.388,124
1,429.039
Costs and FlnanUng 3,026,538 2,664,795 65,751,843 ,
(
9,562) )
,
,
( , , ,
Beglnning Fund BalanrA 3.026,538 5.691,333 68,443,176 29,903,814 9.073.688 8,895,944 9,558.885 10.403,154 11,371,424 12,432,446 13,506,252 14,656,277 15,882,685 17,791,469 18,559,593
Transfer to Protect Fund
Endin
Fund Balance
3
026
538
691
333
5 3,000,000
176
68
443
29
903
614
073,688
9
8,895,944
9,558,865
70,403,154
17,371,424
12,432,4411
13.508,252
14,656,271
15,882.885
17,191.469
18.559.593
79,988,632
g ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
Analysts of Ending Fund Balance
Cash Available for Operatlons
3,026,536
5,891,333
6,907,090
8,050,344
8,499,773
8,895,944
9,558,885
10,403,154
11,371,424
72,432,448
73,506,252
14,656,271
15,882,885
17,191,469
18,559,593
19,988,632
Reserved for Capital ProJed
Total Ending Fund Baance
3,026,538
5,697,333 67,538,066
68,443,178 27,853,270
29.903,614 573,915
9,073,688
8,895,944
9,558,865
10,403,154
11,371,424
12,432,448
13,508,252
14,656,271
15,882,885
17,191,469
18,559,593
19.988.632
Assumptlons:
Sales and Latlging Tax Projections per Bernstein and Associates through 2012; inflated 2% th ereafter -
$4.3 million mnbibution from Vail R esorts for parking received December 2005 -
Debt service per Piper Jaffrey 08/31/05
Operatlrg bsses per HVS
Capital maintenance fund inUUtled in cash flow per HVS
Pre-opera0ng marketing costs of $1.5 million inUutletl In cash flow; not reimburse0 from bontl proceeds
Town of Vail management fee of 5 % induded
s!
050908 Town Council 1.5% Tax 9/1105
TOWN OF VAIL
REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -1.5°6 NEW TAX
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2021 2025 2029 2027 2028 2029 2030 2071 2032 2033 ~ 2034 2035
Project Cosh and Flnancing
Bond Proceeds
Costs of Issuance ~
Interest on Investment of Bond Proceeds
Net Cash Proceeds from Bonds
Vail Resorts
Transfer hom fund balance
Total Flnancing
Capital Project Costs ~ '
Financing Ovar (Under) Projad Coats
OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE
Revenue from Texas and Interest
Sales Taz
2,347,000
2,393,900 ~
2,441,800
2,490,600
2,540,400
2,591,200
2,643,000
2,695,800
2,749,800
1
2,804,800
900
2
692 '
2,860,900
746
800
2
2,918,100
700
801
2
2,97fi,500
2
857
700
3,038,000
914
900
2
3,0%,700
2.973
200
3,158,800
3,032,700
3,221,600
3,093,400
Public AccomodaBons Tax 2,253,100 2,2%,200 2,344,200 2,391,100 2,438,900 2,487,700 2,537,500
500
2
537 2,588,300
588
300
2 2,640,
00
100
2
840 ,
,
900
2
692 ,
,
748
800
2 ,
,
801,700
2 ,
,
2.657,700 ,
,
2.914,900 ,
.
2,973,200 3,032,700 3,093,400
Addi8onal Public ACwmodations Tas 2,253,100 2,2%,200 2,344,200 2,391,100 2,438,900 2,487,700 ,
, ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
, ,
Penalties and tnterest on Delinquent Taxes
Total Conference Center Taxes
6,853,200
8,990,300
7,130,200
7,272,800
7,418,200
7,566,800
7,778,000
7,872,500
8,030,000
8,190,600
8,354,500
8,521.500
B.fi91,900
8,865,800
804
000
9,043,100
654
000
9,224,000
907
000
9,408,600
000
962
Interest on fund Balance 351,000 375,000 400 000 426,000 455,000 485.000 578,000
236
000 552,000
424
500
8 589,000
619
000
8 828.000
818
600
8 668,000
500
9
022 711,000
232,500
9 757,000
9,448,900 ,
9.669,800 ,
9,897,100 ,
10,131,000 ,
10,370.600
Total Revenue 7,204,200 7,365.300 7,530,200 7,6%,800 7,873,200 8,051,600 ,
8, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
Operating Expenditures
Conference Center Operatbns per HVS
1,210,900
1,247,200
1,2114,fi00
1,323,100
1,362,800
1,403,700
1,445,800
1,489,200
1,533,900
1,579,900
1,627,300
1,678,100
1,726,400
440
000
1,778,200
440
000
1,631,500
440
000
1,886,400
440
000
1,943,000.
000
440
Trensfer to Capital Maintenance FurW _ 415,000 420,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000
393
625 435,000
500
401 435,000
409
530 440,000
417
725 440,000
075
428 ,
434,595 ,
443,290 ,
452,155 ,
461,200 ,
470,430
Town of Va0 Management Fee 342,860 349,Si5 356,510 363.840 370,910 378,330 385.900 , , , , ,
Professional antl Design Fees I Mtg expense
ToW Operetlng Expenditures ~
1,968,560
2,018,715
2,076,110
2,121,740
2,168,710
2,217,030
2,266,700
2,317,825
2,370,400
2,424,430
2,485,025
2,542,175
2,600,995
2,661,490
2.723,fi55
2,787,600
2,853,430
Debt Servlee ~ 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707.221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221
Total Expenditures for Operations and DeM 5.875,781 5,723,936 5,783,331 5,828,%1 5,875,931 5,924,251 5,973,921 6,025.046 8,077,821 8,131,651 6,192,240 6,249,3% 8,308,218 6,388,711 6,430,878 6,494,821 6560,851
Revenue Over (Under( Operatlng Expendltui
Servlw
1,528,419
1,641,364
1,746,869
1,869,839
1,997,269
2,127,349
2,262;079
2,399,454
2,541,379
2,686,949
2,830,254
2,983,104
3,140,884
3,301,089
3,466,224 ~
3,638,179
3,809,949
Revenue Mer (Under) Eupendilurea Includ4
Costs and Finandng ~
1,528,419
1,841,364
1,746,8fi9
1,%9,839
1,997.289
2,127,349,
2,262,079
2,399,454
2.541,379
2,888,949
2,830,254
2,983,104
3.140,684
3,301,089
3.466,224
3,638,179
3.809.949
Beginning Fund Balanu 19,988,632 21,517,051 23,158,415 24,905,284 28,775,123 28,772,392 30,899,741 33,181,820 35,Sfii,274 38,102.853 40,789,602 43,619,656 48,602,960 49,743,644 53,044,733 58.510,957 60,147,136
Transfer to Project Fund
Ending Fund Balance
21,517,051
23,158,415
24,905,284
26,775,123
28,772,392
30.699,741
33,181,820
35,561,274
38,102,653
40,789,602
43,619,856
46,602,960
49.743,844
53,044,733
56,510,957
80,147,138
fi3,957,085
Analysis of Ending Fund Balance
Gash Available for OperaBons
21,517,051
23,t58,d15
24,905,284
28,775,123
28,772,392
30,899,741
33,181,820
35,561,274
38,702,653
40,789,602
43,619,858
48,602,960
49.743,644
53,044,733
58,510,957
60,147,136
63,957,085
Reserved to Capital Project
Total Ending Fund Balanu
21,517,051
23,158,475
24,905,284
28,775,123
28,772,392
30.899,741
33,181,820
35,561,274
38,102,653
40,789,602
43,619,856
48,602,%0
49,743,644
53,044.733
56,510,957
60,147,138
fi3,957 085
050906 Town CounrA
1.5% Tax
9!1/05
DRAFT
TOWN.OF VAIL
REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -NEW TAX FOR DEBT SERVICE ONLY
Project Costa and Flnancing
Bond Proceeds
Costs of Issuance
Interest on InvesMent of Bond Proceeds
Net Cash Proceeds from Bonds
Vail Resorts
Transfer from fun0 balance
Total Financing
Capital Project Coate '
Flnancing Over (Under) Project Coco
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 21)28 2027 2020 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2W4 2075
OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE _ -
Ravenus from Taxes and fntaraat
Sales Tax
900
2
393
2
441
800
800
490
2
540
400
2
2,591,200
2,643,000
2,695,900 ~
2,749,800
2,804,800
2,680,900
2,918,100
2,978,500
3,038,000
3,096,700
3,158,800
3,221,800
Public AccomodaOOns Tax ,
,
2
298
200 ,
,
344
200
2 ,
,
391
100
2 ,
,
2,438,900 2,487,700 2,537,500 2,588,300 2,840,100 2,692,900 2,746,800 2.801,700 2.857,700 2,914,900 2,973,200 3,032,700 3,093,400
Additional Public ACCOmafaBOns Tas ,
,
1,205,800 ,
,
1,229,900 ,
,
1,254,500 1,279,fi00 1,305,200 1,331,300 1,358,000 1,3!15,200 1,412,900 1,441,200 1,470,000 1,499,300 1,529,400 1,559,900 1,591,200 1,823,000
PenalBes and Interest on Delinquent Taxes
Total Conference Center Taxea
5,897,900
8,015,900
8,136,200
8,258,900
8,3&1,100
8,511,800
6,642,200
8,775,100
6,910.600
7,048,900
7,189,800
7,333,500
7,480,300
7,fi29,800
7,782,500
000
368
7,938,200
000
395
Interest on Fund Balance 159,000 166,000 173.000 IB2,000 191,000 203.000 215,000 229,000 244,000 261,000 279,000
4
800 299,000
7
832
500 321,000
7
807
300 344.000
7
973
800 ,
150
500
8 ,
333
200
8
Total Revenue 6,058,900 8,181,900 8,709,200 6,440.900 8,575,100 6,714,800 8,857,200 7,004,100 7,154,600 7,309,900 7,
68, ,
. ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
OperaOng Expenditures
Conference Center Operations per HVS
1,247,200
1,284,600
1,323,100
1,382,800
1,403,700
1,445,800
1,489,200
1,533,900
1,579,900
1,627,300
1,678,100
1,72fi,400
1,718,200
1,831,500
40
000
1,886,400
440
000
1,943,000
440
000
Transfer fo Capital Maintenance FuM 420,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 440,000
352
445 440,000
490
359 440,000.
386
675 440,000
374
015 ,
4
490
381 ,
389,125 ,
396,910
Town of Vail Management Fee 294.895 300,795 306,810 312,945 319,205 325,590 332,110 338,755 345,530 , , , , ,
Professional and Design Fees I Mfg expense
Total OparaOng Expenditures .
1,962,095
2,020,395
2,064,910
2,110,745
2,157,905
2.208,390
2,258,310
2,307,655
2,360,430
2,419,745
2.475,590
2,533,075
2,592,215
2,852,990
2,715,525
2,779.910
Debt Sarvlce 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 .3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707.221 3.707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221
Total Expenditures for OperaOOns and Oabl 5,669,316 5,727,816 5,772,131 5,817,968 5,865.128 5,913,611 5,983,531 8,014,876 6,067,851 6,126,968 8.182,811 8,240,298 6,299,436 6,360,211 6,422,746 fi,4B7,131
Revenue Ovar (Under) OparaBng Expendihu
Sarvlce
387,584
454,284
537,069.
622,934
709,974
801,189
893,869
~ 989,224
1,086,949
1,182,934
1,285,989
1,392,204
1,501,864
1,613,569
1,727,754
1,84fi,069
Revenue War (Under) Expenditurea Includb
Costs and Financng
387,584
454.284
537,089
822,934
709,974
801,189
893,669
989,224
1,086.949
1,182,934
1,285,989
1,392,204
1,501,884
1,613,589
1,727,754
1,848,069
8eginning Fund Balancs 7,594,981 7,982,565 .8,436,849 8,973,918 9,598,852 10,308.828 11,108,015 12,OOt,fi84 12,990,906 14,077,857 15,260,791 18,546,780 17,938,984 19,440,648 21,054,437 22,782,191
Transfer to Project Fund
Entling Fund Balanw
7,982,5fi5
8,436,849
8,973,918
9,598,852
10,306,826
11,108,015
12,001,684
12,990.908
14,077,857
15,260,791
18,S4fi,780
17,938,984
19,440,848
21,054.437
22,782,191
24,628,260
Analysts of Ending Fund Batanw
Cash Available for Operatons
7,982,565
8.438,849
8,973,918
9,596,852
10,306,828
11,108,015
12,001,684
12,990,908
14,077,657
15,280,791
18,548,780
17,938,984
19,440,848
21,054,437
,22.782,191
24,628,260
Reserved for Capital Project
Total Ending Fund Balance
7,982,565
6,436,849
8,973,918
9,596,852
10,308,828
11,108,015
12,001.684
12,990,908
14,077,857
15,260,791
16,546,780
17,938,984
19,440,848
21,054,437
22,782,191
24,628,260
,~
050906 Town Council ~ 050906 Counr~l ~ 9/7/05
DRAFT
TOWN OF VAIL
REVENUE. EXPENDITURES, AND C47ANGES tN FUND BALANCE
CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -NEW TAX FOR DEBT SERVICE ONLY
2003 2004 Zoos
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013 ~
2014
2015
~ 2018
2017
2018
2079
Actual Actual Projaceon 20
8
Project Cosb and Flnancing ~ Total Pro ed ~ ~ '
Bond Proceeds 57,700.000 57,700.000
Costs of Issuance (1,644,631) (1,644,631)
639
166
1
249,102
1;758
.
Interest on Investment of BorW Proceeds 1,417,497 ,
,
008
57
222 249,102 1,756 -
Net Cash Proceeds from Bands
VailResods 57,472,866
4.3~.~ ,
,
4•~•~
Tr
fund bal
nce
f
f D00
000
3 3,000,000 - ~~
ans
er
rom
a ,
, - 008
64
522 249
102 1,756 -
Total Flnandng
CapitalProjactCosts fi4,772,866
84,772,868 788,788 ,
,
2,199,134 ,
39,931,918 21,281,111 573,915
Flnancing Over (Under) ProJact Costs 0 (786 788) 82 322 874 (39,682,818) (21,279.355) (573,915) -
OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE
Revenue from Taxes and Interest
Sales Tax
~ 7,703,864 1,828,234
1,805,700
1,828,900
1,844,800
1,894,700
1,944,500
1,977,400
2,010,300
2,043,200
1
981
500
2,084,100
700
2
000
2,125,800
700
2
040
2,188,300
2
081
500
2,211.700
123,100
2
2,255,900
2,185,600
2,301,000
2,208,900
2,347,000
2,253,100
Public ACCOmodations Tax 1,573,289 1,730,378 1,733,500 1,755,800 1,771,100 1,878,900 1,868,800
7
400 1,898,400
000
998 1,929,900
800
1
012 ,
,
100
7
029 ,
,
700
1
049 ,
,
1,070,7011 ,
,
1,092,100 ,
1,113,900 1,138,200 1,158,900 9,782,100
Additbnal Public Accomodaoons Tae 0.79% 921,200 929.200 954,300 9,
9 . ,
. ,
, ,
,
PenalBes and Interest on Delinquent Taxes 4,598 8,458
587
070
3
1
757
200
539
3
4
505
900
4,545.100
4,667,900
4,790,700
4,871,800.
4,952,800
5,033,800
5,134,500
5,237,200
5,341,900
5,448,700
5,557,700
147
000
5,668,8D0
150
000
5,782,200
154
000
Total Conference Canter Taxes
Interest on Fund BeWnce - ,
,
,
.
3,28
18,824 87,603 ,
,
118,000 ,
,
149,000 149,000 143,000 138,000 135.000 135,000
800 136,000
169
800
5 137,000
271
500
5 139,000
200
37fi
5 141,000
482
900
5 143.000
5,591.700 ,
5,704,700 ,
5,818,800 ,
5,938,200
Total Revenue 3,300,575 3,634,873 3,655,200 4,654,900 4,694,100 4,810,900 4,928,700 5,006,800 5,087, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
Oparatlrig Expenditures
000
375
1,125,000
1,285,183
1,135,053
1,045,980
1,008,104
984,645
1,014,200
1,044.600
1,075,900
1,108,200
000
1,141,400
350
000
1,175,600
400
000
~ 1,210,900
415
000
Conference Center Operations per HVS , 40
W0 70,000 80,000 100,000- 135,000 220,000 250,000 275,000 300, , , ,
289
110
Transfer b Capital Maintenance Fund 394
599 180
169 98D
178 295
225 227,255 ,
233,395 239,535 243,590 247,640 251,690 258,725 281,860 287,095 272.435 277,885 283,440 ,
Town of Vail Management Fee
Professional and Design Fees I Mtg expense ,
,
5.0%
104,438 2 698 ,
49,271
31 ,
3,0110
603
295 3000
255
355
1
1
558
878
1,444,588
1,369,570
1,353,744
1,371,335
1,490,925
1,556,460
5,617,995
7,880,835
1,789,285
1,859,040
1,915,O1D
Total OperaBng Expenditures 274,037 183,090 226,2 , ,
, ,
,
~ ~ 707
221
3 3,707 221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,227. 3,707,221 3,707,221 3.707,221. 3,7D7,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221
Debt Service 1
3
090 237
228 ,
,
578
4
310 478
5
082 5,266,099 5,151,809 5,078,791 5,080,965 5,078,558 5,198,146 5,283,881 5,325,218 5,387,858 V 5,478,50fi 5,568,261 5,622,231
Total Expenditures for OperaBons and Da ,
8
bt Serviee 274,037 , ,
, ,
,
Revenue Over (Under) Operatlng Expenditures And Dabt
9
344
384
376)
(388
(455
199)
(223.109)
(89.991)
26,835
91,244
73.354
112,519
157,884
203,844
228,194
152,539
313,969
Sarviw 3,028,538 3,451,583 3,428,98 , , ,
Revenue Ovar (Under) Ezpendltuns Including Projeet -
3
432)
39
338
731)
(21
847
(1
029
114)
(223.109)
(89,991)
28,835
91,244
73,354
112,579
757,884
203.844
228,194
252,539
313,969
CosisandFlnandng 3,026,538 2,664,795 65,757,84 ,
,
( ,
, ,
,
026
538
- - 3 333
691
5 68,443,176 29,104,744 7,457,013 6,427,899 8,204,790 8,134,799 8,181,634 6,252,878 8,328,232 8,438,751 8,598,435 8,800,279 7,028,173 7,281,012
Beginning Fund Balance
Transfer to Project Fund ,
,
691
333
5 ,
,
3.000,OW
176
68
443
104
744
29
013
7
457
8427,899
6,204,790
8,134,799
6,181,634
6,252,878
6,328,232
fi,438,757
6,596,435
fi,800.279
7,028,473
7,261,012
7,594,981
Ending Fund Balance ,
.
3,026,538 ,
, .
, ,
,
Malyais of Ending Fund Balance
691
333
' 5
090
8
907
251
474
7
098
8
883
8,427,899
8,204.790
6,134,799
6,181,834
8,252.878
8,328,232
fi,438,751
6,598,435
8,800,279
7,028,473
7,281,012
Cash Available la Operations
Reserved for Capital Project ,
,
3,026,538 ,
,
81,536,086 ,
,
21,853,270 ,
,
573,915
427
899
6
790
204
8
734
799
8
181
634
6
8,252,878
6,326,232
6,438,751
6,596.435
6,800,279
7,028,473
7,281,012
7,594,981
Total Ending Fund Balance 3,026,538 5,691,333 88,443,176 29,104,744 7,457,013 ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
Asaump0ans:
Sales and Lodging Tax ProiacUons per Bernstein and Assodates Through 2012; inflated 2% therea8er
54.3 million wntribution (ran Va0 Resorts for parking received December 2005
Debt service per Piper JaBray 08131ro5 - _
OpemBrg bsses per HVS
- Capital maintenance hmd induded b cash lbw per HVS
Pre-operating marketkg costs of 51.5 millon induded in rash flaw: cwt reimbursed from bond Droceeds
Town of Va8 management lee d 5Y. included
050908 Town Courx:0
o5osoe Courxil
snros
f
Attachment D
Resolution 16, Series of 2005: Ballot Language
RESOLUTION NO. 16
SERIES 2005
A RESOLUTION SUBMITTING TO THE REGISTERED ELECTORS
OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AT A REGULAR
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8; 2005, A BALLOT
ISSUE CONCERNING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS AND AN
INCREASE IN TAXES TO FINANCE A CONFERENCE CENTER;
AND PROVIDING OTHER DETAILS RELATING THERETO
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado (the "Town"), is
a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under laws of the State of Colorado
(the "State") and the Town Charter (the "Charter"}; and
WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council")have been duly
elected acid qualified; and
WHEREAS, the Council hereby fords and determines that it is in the public interest to
finance the construction of a conference center in the Town and that it is necessary to increase taxes
and issue bonds for such purpose; and
WHEREAS, Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, also referred to as the
Taxpayer's Bill of Rights ("TABOR"), requires voter approval for any new tax, any increase in any
tax rate, the creation of any debt, and the spending of certain funds above limits established by
TABOR; and
WHEREAS, TABOR requires the Town to submit ballot issues (as defined in TABOR) to
the Town's electors on limited election days before action can be taken on such ballot issues; and
WHEREAS, the Town will hold its regular municipal election on November 8, 2005 (the
"Election"); and
WHEREAS, November 8, 2005, is one of the election dates at which ballot issues maybe
submitted to the Town's electors pursuant to TABOR; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Charter, the .Council hereby determines that the
Election shall be held and conducted as a polling place election in accordance with Article 10 of
Title 31, Colorado Revised Statutes ("C.R.S.") (the "Municipal Election Code"); and .
WHEREAS, the Council is of the opinion that the Town should seek voter approval to
increase taxes and increase debt for the purpose provided in this resolution; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to set forth certain procedures concerning the conduct of the
Election.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO:
Section 1. Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used herein shall have the
meanings defined in TABOR and in Section 31-10-102, C.R.S.
Section 2. Pursuant to Section 31-10-105, C.R.S. and Section 2.5 ofthe Charter,
the Election Commission of the Town shall perform all acts required or permitted by law in
connection with the Election, which Election shall beheld and conducted as an independent polling
place election. .
Section 3. Pursuant to the applicable laws of the State and the Charter, the
Council hereby determines that the following ballot issue is hereby referred to the registered electors
of the Town and shall appear on the ballot of the Town of Vail, Colorado, at the Election:
SHALL TOWN OF VAIL DEBT BE INCREASED $7,640,000 WITH A
REPAYMENT COST OF $16,685,040 AND SHALL TOWN TAXES BE
INCREASED $1,950,000 ANNUALLY IN THE FIRST FULL YEAR OF
COLLECTION AND BY WHATEVER ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS AS ARE
RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER FROM THE LEVY OF AN ADDITIONAI,
LODGING TAX OF NOT MORE THAN 1.5% (WHICH WILL RESULT IN A
TOTAL LODGING TAX IMPOSED BY THE TOWN OF NOT MORE THAN
3.0%) TO FINANCE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A CONFERENCE CENTER
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIlVIITS OR CONDITIONS:
• IF THIS QUESTION IS APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, THE
AUTHORITY TO ISSUE DEBT PURSUANT TO THIS QUESTION
TOGETHER WITH THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE DEBT
PURSUANT TO QUESTION 2B APPROVED BY THE VOTERS
ON NOVEMBER 5, 2002 WILL TOTAL $57,700,000 WITH A
REPAYMENT COST OF $112,295,000; AND
• IF THIS QUESTION IS APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, THE
SUNSET FOR THE LODGING TAX AND SALES TAX LEVIED
PURSUANT TO 2002 QUESTION 2B IS REPEALED AND SUCH
TAXES AND THE LODGING TAX LEVIED PURSUANT TO
THIS QUESTION SHALL NOT TERMINATE UNTIL
TERMINATED BY LEGISLATIVE ACTION BY THE TOWN;
AND
2
IF THIS QUESTION IS NOT APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, THE
AUTHORITY TO ISSUE DEBT PURSUANT TO 2002 QUESTION
2B SHALL TERMINATE IlVIl~~1EDIATELY AND THE
AUTHORITY TO LEVY TAXES PURSUANT TO 2002
QUESTION 2B SHALL TERMINATE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
2006, AND THE TOWN COUNCIL SHALL EITHER REFUND
ANY REMAINING REVENUES FROM- SUCH TAXES
PURSUANT TO SUCH REFUND METHODOLOGY AS THE
TOWN COUNCIL DETERMINES OR SUBMIT A QUESTION TO
THE VOTERS ON HOW SUCH REVENUES SHALL BE USED;
AND
• THE LODGING TAX AND SALES TAX LEVIED PURSUANT TO
2002 QUESTION 2B AND THE LODGING TAX LEVIED
PURSUANT TO THIS QUESTION ARE CURRENTLY
ANTICIPATED TO BE SUFFICIENT TO PAY DEBT SERVICE
• ON THE BONDS AND APPROXIMATELY $1,500,000 OF THE
COSTS OF ANNUALLY OPERATING AND MAINTAINING THE
CONFERENCE CENTER; AND
• IN ORDER TO FINANCE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE
CONFERENCE CENTER, THE TOWN COUNCIL MAY LEVY,
INCREASE OR DECREASE THE LODGING TAX APPROVED
BY THIS QUESTION FROM TIME TO TIME SO LONG AS IT
DOES NOT EXCEED THE RATE OF 1.5%; AND
• SUCH. LODGING TAX SHALL BE LEVIED ON THE PRICE PAID
FOR THE RENTING OR LEASING OF LODGING FOR LESS
THAN THIRTY CONSECUTIVE DAYS; AND
• SUCH DEBT SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY THE ISSUANCE OF
REVENUE BONDS PAYABLE FROM THE LODGING TAX
AUTHORIZED BY THIS QUESTION AND THE LODGING TAX
AND SALES TAX AUTHORIZED IN 2002 QUESTION 2B; SUCH
BONDS TO BE SOLD IN ONE OR MORE SERIES ON TERMS
AND CONDITIONS AND WITH SUCH MATURITIES AS
PERMITTED BY LAW AND AS THE TOWN COUNCIL MAY
DETERMINE, INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR REDEMPTION
OF THE BONDS PRIOR TO MATURITY WITH OR WITHOUT
PAYMENT OF A PREMIUM OF NOT MORE THAN THREE
PERCENT OF THE AMOUNT SO REDEEMED; AND
3
THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH DEBT AND TAXES AND ANY
EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH PROCEEDS
AND REVENUES BE COLLECTED AND SPENT AS A VOTER
APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE UNDER ARTICLE X,
SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION?
Section 4. If a majority of the votes cast on the question to authorize the bonds
and the levy of taxes submitted at the Election shall be in favor of issuance of the bonds and the levy
of taxes as provided in such question, the Town, acting through the Council, shall be authorized to
proceed with the necessary action to issue the bonds and levy the taxes in accordance with such
question. Any authority to issue the bonds and levy the taxes, if conferred by the results of the
Election, shall be deemed and considered a continuing authority to issue the bonds and levy the taxes
so authorized at any one time, or from time to time, and neither the partial exercise of the authority
so conferred, nor any lapse of time, shall be considered as exhausting or limiting the full authority so
conferred.
Section 5. The officers and employees of the Town are.hereby authorized and
directed to take all action necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this resolution.
Section 6. All actions heretofore taken (not inconsistent with the provisions of
this resolution) by the Town and the officers thereof, directed towards the Election and the objects
and purposes herein stated are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed.
Section 7. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this resolution shall
for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such
section, paragraph, clause or provision shall in no manner affect any remaining provisions of this
resolution, the intent being that the same are severable.
Section 8. All resolutions or parts of resolutions inconsistent herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revive any
resolution or part of any resolution heretofore repealed.
4
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this September 6, 2005.
Rod Slifer; Mayor
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
5
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF EAGLE )SS.
TOWN OF VAIL )
I, the Town Clerk of the Town of Vail, Colorado, do hereby certify that:
1. The foregoing pages are a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution (the
"Resolution")passed and adopted by the Town Council (the "Council") constituting the governing
board of the Town of Vail, Colorado (the "Town"), at a regular meeting of the Town held at the
Town Hall on September 6, 2005, convening at the hour of 6:00 p.m. as recorded in the regular book
of official records of the proceedings of said Town of Vail kept in my office.
2. The Resolution was duly moved and seconded and the Resolution was adopted
at the meeting of September 6, 2005, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the
Council as follows:
Name "Yes" "No" Absent Abstain
Rod Slifer
Dick Cleveland
Diana Donovan
Kim Ruotolo
Kent Logan
Greg Moffet
Farrow Hitt
6
J
3. .The members of the Council were present at such meeting and voted on the
passage of such Resolution asset forth above.
4. The Resolution was approved and authenticated by the signature of the Mayor,
sealed with the Town seal, attested by the Town. Clerk and recorded in the minutes of the Council.
5. There are no bylaws, rules or regulations of the Council which might prohibit
the adoption of said Resolution:
6. The notice of the meeting of September 6, 2005, in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A, was posted at the Town Hall, not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting in accordance
with law.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Town affixed this September 6, 2005.
Town .Clerk
(SEAL)
7
EXHIBIT A
(Attach Form of Meeting Notice)
pubfin\179926_1.dac
Attachment E
Resolution 17, Series of 2005: Trigger threshold for
Lodging Tax
RESOLUTION N0.17
SERIES 2005
A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE INTENTION OF THE TOWN
COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
LODGING TAX WHICH IS BEING SUBMITTED TO THE
ELECTORS OF THE TOWN AT A REGULAR MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2005 AND WITH
RESPECT TO OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE CONFERENCE
CENTER.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado (the "Town"), is
a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under laws of the State of Colorado
(the "State") and the Town Charter (the "Charter"); and
WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council")have been duly
elected and qualified; and
WHEREAS, the Council has determined to submit a ballot issue to the electors of the Town
on November 8, 2005, which authorizes a lodging tax increase to provide a portion of the revenues to
finance, operate and maintain a conference center in the Town; and
WHEREAS, the ballot issue will permit the Council to levy, increase or decrease a lodging
tax from time to time so long as it does not exceed the rate of 1.5%; and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to express its present intention as to (1) when the tax will be
levied, increased or decreased and (2) that no revenues of the Town will be used to support the
conference center other than the lodging tax being submitted at the November 8, 2005 election, the
lodging tax and sales tax levied pursuant to Question 2B (approved at the 2002 election), and the
revenues derived from the operation of the conference center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO:
Section 1. If the electors of the Town approve the ballot issue being submitted at
the election on November 8, 2005, the Council presently intends to levy, increase or decrease the
lodging tax approved at such election for the purpose of fmancing, 'operating and maintaining the
conference center up to the maximum rate of 1.5%. Of the maximum rate of 1.5%, it is currently
expected that the Council will need to levy a lodging tax to take effect on a yet to be determined date
during 2006 at a rate of .79% in order to secure the payment of the bonds to be issued to finance the
conference center. The actual rate to be used to secure the payment of the bonds and the date it will
take effect will be determined when the bonds are marketed and be based upon the requirements of
credit rating agencies and the bond insurer, if any. When the cash reserves available to the Town and
derived from the lodging tax approved at such election and the lodging tax and sales tax levied
pursuant to Question 2B (approved at the 2002 election) exceeds $5,000,000, the rate of the tax shall
be decreased to only the rate required to be levied by any covenants made to the holders of the bonds
issued to finance the conference center. The rate of the tax may be increased up to the maximum rate
of 1.5% by the Council without further voter approval when such reserves are less than $5,000,000.
In no event shall the rate of tax be decreased below the level required to be levied in any covenants
made to the holders of the bonds issued to finance the conference center. For purposes of this
resolution, cash reserves do not include any debt service reserves required to be maintained by
covenants made to the holders of the bonds issued to finance the conference center. The amount of
cash reserves shall be determined by the Finance Director as of the first business day in July of each
year beginning July of 2008. It is intended that any adjustment of the tax rate shall occur on the next
January 1. '
Section 2. The Council intends that the costs of financing, operating and
maintaining the conference center will be paid solely from the lodging tax being submitted at the
November 8, 2005 election, the lodging tax and sales tax levied pursuant to Question 2B (approved
at the 2002 election), and the revenues derived from the operation of the conference center and that
no other Town revenues will be used for such purposes.
Section 3. This resolution may be amended or repealed by the Council at any
time..
Section 4. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this resolution shall
for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such
section, paragraph, clause or provision shall in no manner affect any remaining provisions of this
resolution, the intent being that the same are severable.
Section 5. All resolutions or parts of resolutions inconsistent herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revive any
resolution or part of any resolution heretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this September b, 2005.
2
~~
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
Rod Slifer, Mayor
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
Attachment F
Parking Analysis from FHU
earl ~~n~~~°~~~e C~n~~r
Jaul~y ~S, S
FELSBURG
Ci HOLT &
ULLEVIG
,~
FELSBURG
~i HOLT
ULLEVIG
mmary
_
__ _ ,
Parkin Su ~ I ~..~
9 : Pp Y
..
.~.;
Demand Parking Available i ~ . ~ Conf: Other,,: Total_
Season/Time of Day Leal Attendance. .Needs From.LH Center` Increase:. Avail
,, w ...~~~. ~. .~.
Ski Season
Day_Light Hours
Avera a
360
55 ..
0
125
s 0
125
;Design ; 700 95 0 125 0 125
_..., . ,~. v ....... _ .n ._ _ .~... ... _- -. -- ._ ....
Extreme ~ . , ._ ...~_.., ....,_, _u
1250 ...._~ ~ w r ..
180 _........ N._ .
. .~ Y
0 . _ _ .Me.
X125 _ ._ .._... w _~~_._
.. _.
~ 0 ._ ~..._ _...~ __~..
~ ...
125
F
Evening Hours }
Average
550
205 i
600-700
125
; 125.
850-950
Design 700. 245 600 700 125 ~ 125
850 950
~` ....... _.a_y_.~... s,. ..:__z ~.:,..._ w.....~..~.r _:...._ .. r~....~..,n._._~_. ~ . , ....~
Extreme 3650 G
i ~.,.r...n
~, ,_~m..=
1120
.._ ,.~,.,W ~Y.
600 700
~a ~ ~~ _ .....
~ .n.,__W,
125 ~_... ~.,
,,..
125
_., ..
.~_
, ..~.__ ...~, . u__
850 950
, _ _ ~..
Summer Season
Day Light Hours Average
....__ ..__ ..._... ~~, ..__.~
._..
.._ .__~ ....~.
.
. , 565 ~
., ~
_ n ...,.m._.a .. ~,.-- 130
....._....., m _. 600-700
.~_ _..r... _ . 125
.. _ .._..._ . 125
`......,: _~ _....~,..
. 850-950'
_~v,.
,__ _. _ ...~
.
_
~.
.
.
Design 900 190 600=700 125 125 _
.
850-950
Extreme ~
_ .... _. 2100
...,u . ~. _., ~......_ . 405 600-700 ' 125 a 125 850-950
Evening Hours Average
450 .~._
175
700-800
125 _
125
950 1050
,Design 900 450 700-800: 125
:_ _
_
~ 125 ~~ _
950-1050.
_ _.._..~. ..._~ _.:,~,~,...__,~.. _
. _ __a
Extreme
_ _ ~.:,.~.~_ .,,__ ,., .
3650
,__,. , ._: ~.__ _~.
1240
_y... _ _..~ __ E._.
700-800
_.. _ .,__W
125 ...a...~..:_ . _,__
125 .:_ ~_~.._.~ ,~_~.~~
950-1050
.,-.
..
,.~
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35
Days on Fr. Road
FELSBURG
Ci HOLT &
ULLEVIG
FELSBURG
~i HOLT &
ULLEVIG
_ ''~
~.
FELSBURG
CiHOLT 6L
ULLEVIG
i~
9~ ~.vs (~S ~~ ~ ~
V
A villa e o es its own wa ~
g g y
Intelligent use of the enrgy wood obtained in our area ~
_ _ _ ,~ C~
___ ~ _ .~ ~
~,~_~i,'
. .. .
_...,
1 -~.:
E ~- •F I .~~~ ~n.
i
1/J! •
TS ; ~r i~ oor.•' u~iir i L.uc~i on ,
The two biomass boilers have a capacity of;o MW.
Lech in figures
Location
Lech is L,45om above sea level and together with Zurs
stretches across 9o square kilometres in the Austrian state
of Vorarlberg.
Population
Main domicile
1890 371
1951 681
1961 1931
i97i i.zi8
1981 l.z7o
i99i 1.234
~~_
zoos 1.466
The population that permanently lives in Lech - 0.4% of
the population in the state - rose by over 80°~; between the
1951 and the 1991 censuses. However the number ofresi-
dents is subject to extreme seasonal variations. [fthe sea-
sonalemployees and guests are added to those with their
main domicile in the village, up to 14,000 people stay in
Lech during the main season.
Seasonal workers: 3.500
Accommodation
A total of6,95z beds are available in Lech. They are divided
up as follows:
z9o in 5-star hotels
z. zoo in 4-star hotels
z.4z8 in 3-star hotels
96z in z-and 1-star homes
531 in private accommodation
8 on farms
6z in youth hostels
431 in holiday apartments
.~~ _
Kilometres of pistes in Lech /Zurs
Lech and Zurs have a unique skiing area. There is a total of
1lo km pistes available, zz of which are for experts, 44
intermediate, and 44 beginners.
Three ski schools (Lech, Oberlech and Zurs) with over 500
ski teachers ensure that theirguests have an unforgettable
skiing experience. Each year the Lech and Zurs pistes are
awarded the Vorarlberg Piste Seat ofQuality for exemplary
preparation and safe signage.
August zoos - L
Arlberg:
Throughout the Arlberg region (Lech, Zurs, Stuben, St.
Anton and St. Christoph) there are z6o km of prepared
pistes available, ofwhich 58 km are for experts, 1 to inter-
mediate,and 9z beginners. A11 the lifts in the Arlberg area
can be used with a ski pass. One speciality are the many
tours in the free skiing area. There are over 18o km which
are known and loved by skiers throughout the world.
These free skiing areas are mainly used together with ski
guides.
Lift facilities in Lech /Zurs
There are 4 cable cars (Lech-Oberlech mountain lift,
Riifibahn I + II and the Trittkopf lift), 18 chair lifts and to
drag Lifts. Highest top station: Muggengrat at an altitude
ofz,45o m
Capacity
The ski lifts have a capacity of44,668 people per hour. This
means that 13.5 million skiers can be transported in a win-
ter season.
Cross-country ski runs
Lech provides 3 cross countryski runs totalling 19 km. The
run into the romanticZug Valley, which is completely free
ofvehicles in winter, is particularly popular.
Hiking
For those that like walking and hiking there are z5 km of
signposted and maintained hiking paths available in
summer. In winter there are t~n~o prepared mountain
hiking paths.
Infrastructure
In summer 6 public tennis courts, 4 indoor tennis courts
and z squash courts, outdoor ice-skating, curling, indoor
ice-skating, feeding wild animals, horse sleigh. rides,
forest swimming pool with slide, children's pool, clim-
bingwall, heated pool, local and hiking bus, guided walks
and mountain tours, local museum, open-air concerts,
l~ltn 1 f
..-
ess trai , orest teaching path, football pitch, library.
Restaurants
48 restaurants, from gourmet get-togethers to small snack
bars, four self-service restaurants.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Biomass District Heating Plant Lech August zoos - 3
Something had to be done
The air pollution in the v-shaped basin of Lech caused
by extensive periods ofatmospheric inversion in winter,
as well as the need for a general improvement ofthe hea-
ting infrastructure of most businesses in Lech were the
starting point and motivation for building a central bio-
mass heating plant.
Partnership Lech -Vorarlberger Kraftwerke AG
After the initial start-up of the "Project Lech -ecologic
life and economy", where the residents and the project
team declared themselves in favour of constructing a
biomass heating plant, the
town started to look for part-
-` n ers that would be able to rea-
lice such a project. The muni-
cipality of Lech and the
Vorarlberger Kraftwerke AG
("Vorarlberg Power Plants")
were put in charge of the rea-
lisation of the biornass dis-
~~trict heating plant. By bund-
_ ~ , _~; ling energy efficiency, regio-
r ,: s,~u:,u-~:.1k«~ ~, ,, .~:,~ ~9~9 na1 value added, and sus-
tainable environmental tech- nology, they invested in
the future.
Four million litres ofoil are replaced by biomass
Every year, some 65,000 cubic metres of wood shavings
and bark are burned that are exclusively sourced from
local sawmills and wood processing plants. This means
that around four million litres ofoil have been replaced,
making a sustainable improvement in the air quality
and ensuring that the local economy is strengthened
over the long term. There is no other tourism town in
Austria (probably not in Europe, either) with as many
residents and guest accommodations as Lech that has
planned, realised and is operating a biomass heating
plant similar to this one. It is a role model in many ways.
Use oflocal heating material
Along with the intelligent use ofthe energy wood obtai-
ned in Vorarlberg, the Lech district biomass heating
plant fulfils the important function of being an ambas-
sador ofthe preservation of the economic strength in a
sensitive mountain and tourism area, of the safeguar-
dingand creation ofjobs and ofthe decrease ofthe con-
sumption of fossil fuels and hence of COz emissions.
Ever since it was put into operation, the biomass district
heating plant Lech has become an integral part of the
infrastructure of our village. This is confirmed by the
too% link-up ratio of buildings that are supplied with
district heating.
Biomass District Hearing Plant Lech August zoos - 4
Ideal location at the town entry
The plant was built in only seven months and is located
right outside Lech. This facilitates the delivery and sto-
rage of the biomass (bark, wood shavings, chopped
wood from industrial and agricultural sources, and logs)
and ensures there is enough space between the premises
and the residential area.
i~.s km of pipes
The plant produces hot water from biomass and sup-
plies heat to zz3 businesses (mainly hotels and guest
houses) through a densely set-up system of t7,5oo m of
district heat pipes. The heat transfer stations in the hea-
ted objects are remote-controlled and maintained by
the headquarters. The current capacity is 3o MW.
Mind the designl
The renowned architect Hermann Kaufmann placed the
building in the shape ofan arch between main road and
Zursbach. It is fitted with two biomass boilers, one oil
boiler to cover peak loads, one electric filter, and one flue
gas condensation unit. The basement holds the pump,
the plant's own transformer station, the power stand-by
unit, and the expansion device.
Subterranean fuel storage
There are two fuel storage rooms holding z,5oo cubic
metres underneath the forecourt on which the bark is
stored. The storage rooms are served by automatic cra-
nes, and they are used for mere storage as well as for dry-
ingthe chopped wood, which works with the waste heat
of the condensation unit.
High number ofvisitors on guided tours
Both the Lech residents and the guests noticed the
improvement ofthe air quality, and the success left both
groups sensitised with respect to environmental pro-
jects in the region. This is impressively shown by the
high number ofvisitors to the heating plant (z,5oo peo-
ple have visited the plant since the year zooo).
The central control unit of the Lech district biomass
heating plant is based on modern computer systems.
The two biomass boilers have a capacity of 3o MW and
provide district heating to zz3 businesses through a t7.5
km network of pipes.
The total ammount ofcosts are > 7 Mio. US Dollar.
~? k •~'
,~
. ~ _ ;._ _
r ~ • • - A f
c
~. ~, , ~.
G
-
M
he central control unit of the Lech district biomus hearing plant is based on computer systcros
The two biomus boilers have a capacity of;o MW and provide district heating to zz; businesses through a t7.g km network of pipes.
Biomass District Heating Plant Lech
August zoos J S
~-