Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-09-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessioni TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 11:00 A.M., TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. i .Bill Gibson ITEM/TOPIC: Site Visit. An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter, 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (30 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold, overturn, or modify the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of variance applications pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On July 25, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition at 1448 Vail Valley Drive. The appellant, Vail Town Council, "called-up" the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision at its August 2, 2005, public hearing. Please refer to the staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005, for additional information. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Town Council upholds the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential. addition at 1448 Vail Valley Drive, subject to the findings in the staff memorandum dated July 25, 2005. However, Staff recommends the Town Council overturns the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition at 1448 Vail Valley Drive, subject to the findings in the staff memorandum dated July 25, 2005. 2. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update. (30 min.) BREAK FOR WORKING LUNCH (10 min.) 3. Greg Hall ITEM/TOPIC: Long-term capital plan. (1 'h hrs.) Stan Zemler Judy Camp ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to staff presentation and provide comments. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This presentation is in response to Council's request for a plan addressing maintenance and replacement of the town's capital assets. Specifically, we have been asked to describe how decisions are made concerning when capital maintenance and replacements are necessary. Capital maintenance and replacements will be a major portion of the five- year plans included in the 2006 budget process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None -information only. 4. Greg Hall ITEMROPIC: ITEM/TOPIC: Discussion of Village Streetscape Mill Creek Court .Building Construction contract Award for 2005-2006. (15 min.) ACTION REDUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/ Deny Village Streetscape Mill Creek Court Building Project Award. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail and Mill Creek Court Condominium Association cooperatively have designed and have received a proposal for construction improvements in Vail Village..The council was advised were under negotiations and it was felt to finishing the streetscape in this area made since. Staff has negotiated a cost sharing of the improvements with the condominium association. The association board has agreed to the proposal. These improvements include the replacement of planters, steps, landscaping, installation of snowmelt .system and final streetscape treatments in addition the association is having their trash dumpster upgraded. The Town of Vail has reviewed the proposal and with the contractor. The Project is scheduled to begin Construction later this year and finish next spring. Staff recommends the council add the required additional dollars to the supplemental budget to fund the town's portion of the project. $ 200,000 from RETT and $50,000 from capital projects fund, the remainder of the project will be funded by the Mill Creek Court Condominium Association ($205,000) and from the existing Streetscape budget ($95,000). Direct the Town Manager to execute a change order to the streetscape contract with B & B Excavating for up to $550,000. ./ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Supplement the Village Streetscape budgets by $ 200,000 to the RETT portion and $ 50,000 from the Capital projects fund and direct the Town Manager to execute, a r change order with B&B Excavating up to $550,000 to construct the streetscape improvements around Mill Creek Court Building. 5. Russ Forrest ITEMlTOPIC: A work session to discuss Resolutions #16, Series of 2005 setting forth language for a ballot question on November Stn, 2005 to raise the lodging tax to pay for the construction and operation of the Vail Conference Center and Resolution 17, Series of 2005 expressing the Town Council's intent in developing a threshold for collecting up to 1.5% in additional lodging tax for the conference center. (60 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide direction on additional information needed to consider: A) Resolution 16, Series of 2005 which sets forth language to have a ballot measure on November 8th which would ask voters to increase the lodging tax for the conference center, and B) Resolution 17, Series of 2005 which would state the Town Council's intent on collecting up to 1.5% of new lodging tax for the conference center. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On August 31St, the Conference Center Advisory Committee met to review the Guaranteed Maximum price from Mortenson Construction and proposed ballot language. At that meeting the Committee unanimously recommended that the Town Council approve Resolution 16 and 17. Resolution 16 would give the Town Council the authority to collect up to 1.5% in new lodging tax to pay for the construction and operation of the conference center. Resolution 17, if approved, would express the Town Council intent on creating a trigger mechanism for collecting up to 1.5% in new lodging tax. 6. Stefan Jochum ITEMITOPIC: Biomass Presentation. (30 min.) A presentation by Stefan Jochum, Village Manager, Lech, Austria regarding the application and operation of "biomass" steam generating plants and associated centralized steam heat distribution systems that serve the Lech community and ski resort. The purpose of the presentation is to gain an understanding of environmentally compatible technological solutions available to assist in the economic utilization of beetle-killed trees and wood base refuse removed from Vail and the surrounding area. 7. ITEMlTOPIC: Information Update. (10 min.) 8. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor & Council. (30 min.) 9. ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session. C.R.S. 24-6-402 (4) (b). Land Acquisition Negotiations. (15 min.) 10. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment. (4:20 p.m.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 12 NOON, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. .~~' r Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. v MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: September 6, 2005 SUBJECT: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12- 6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC05.0047) Appellant: Vail Town Council Planner: Bill Gibson I. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1. II. STANDING OF APPELLANT The appellant, Vail Town Council, has standing to "call-up"any decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code. III. REQUIRED ACTION The Vail Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission's approval, of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Pursuant to Sub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code: "The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this title (i.e. Title 72, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code) have orhave notbeen met." IV. BACKGROUND On June 27, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing to consider an application for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition at 1448 Vail Valley Drive. The applicant's proposal included a garage, bedroom, bathroom, elevator, and entry addition. This item was discussed by the Commission and tabled for further discussion at a future public hearing. The applicant subsequently amended the application by eliminating the proposed bedroom and bathroom. The applicant's amended application was reviewed by the Commission at its July 25, 2005, public hearing. Based upon the evidence and, testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission determined that the proposed variance application met the criteria for review outlined in Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, and the Commission approved the application for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. At its August 2, 2005, public hearing the Vail Town Council "called-up" this Planning and Environmental Commission decision. Excerpts from the Staff memorandums to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated June 27 and July 25, 2005 (see Attachment A and C) and the associated Planning and Environmental Commission meeting results (see Attachment B and D) have been attached for reference. V. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN CODE Chapter 12-3, Administration and Enforcement !in part) Section 12-3-3: Appeals (in part) C. Appeal Of Planning And Environmental Commission Decisions And Design Review Board Decisions: 7. Authority: The Town Council shallhave the authority to hearand decide appeals from any decision, determination or interpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission or the Design Review Board with respect to the provisions of this Title and the standards and procedures hereinafter set forth. 2. Initiation: An appeal may be initiated by an applicant, adjacent property owner, or any aggrieved or adversely affected person from any order, decision, determination orinterpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission or the Design Review Board with respect to this Title. "Aggrieved or adversely affected person"means any person who will sufferan adverse effect to an interest protected or furthered by this Title. The alleged adverse interest may be shared in common with other members. of the community at large, but shall exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons. The Administratorshall determine the standing ofan appellant Ifthe appe//antobjects to the Administrator's determination of standing, the Town Council shall, at a meeting prior to hearing evidence on the appeal, make a determination as to the standing of the appellant. If the Town Council determines that the appellant does not have standing to bring an appeal, the appeal shall not be heard and the original action or determination stands. The Town Council may also call up a decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission or the Design Review Board by a majority vote.of those Council members present. 2 5. Findings: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this Title have or have not been met Chapter 12-17 Variance (in part) Section 12-17-1: PURPOSE: A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistentwith the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement,. variances from certain regulations maybe granted. A practical difficultyor unnecessary physical hardship may resultfrom the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physicallimitations, street/ocations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. Section 12-17-6: CRITERIA AND.FINDINGS: A. Factors Enumerated: Before acting on a variance application, the planning and environmental commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: 7. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinify; or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. B. Necessary Findings: The planning and environmental commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: 7. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a granf of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the health, safety, or welfare improvements in the vicinity. variance will not be detrimental to the public or materially injurious to properties or 3 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would resultin practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally fo other properties in the same zone. c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. VI. -STAFF RECOMMENDATION Setback Varianc The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council upholds the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details.in regard thereto _ On an appeal, the Town Council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence. presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, have or have not been met Should the Town Council choose to uphold the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1; the Community Development Department recommends the Town Council make the following findings: "1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District, since a similar setback variance for a garage addition to this residence was approved by the Town of Vail in 1991 as funherdiscussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or irrprovements in the vicinity. 3. This .variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strictliteral interpretation orenforcementofthespecifiedregulation would resultin practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, due to the configuration of the existing structure on the site. Additionally, a similar setback variance for a garage addition to this residence was approved by the Town of Vail in 1991 as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. 4 b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, due to the configuration of the existing structure on the site. Additionally, a similar setback variance for a garage addition to this residence was approved by the Town of Vail in 1991 as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. c. The .strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, due to the configuration of the existing structure on the site. Additionally, a similar setback variance for a garage addition to this residence was approved by the Town of Vail in 1991 as further discussed iri the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. " Site Coverage Variance The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council overturns the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section.12-6C-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/L' of 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. On an appeal, the Town Council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, have or have not been met. , Should the Town Council choose to overturn the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1; the Community Development Department recommends the Town Council make the following findings: "1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District, since a garage addition can be constructed in conformance with the site coverage limits and those proposed additions in excess of the site coverage limits also exceed the gross residential floor area limits as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is not warranted for the following reasons: a. The strictliteral interpretation orenforcementofthesyecified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, since a garage addition can be constructed in conformance with the site coverage limits 5 and those proposed additions in excess of the site coverage limits also exceed the gross residential floor area limits as further discussed in the .Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, since a garage addition can be constructed in conformance with the site coverage limits and those proposed additions in excess of the site coverage limits also exceed the gross residential floor area limits as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, since a garage addition can be constructed in conformance with the site coverage limits and those proposed additions in excess the site coverage limits also exceed the gross residential floor area limits as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005." Density Control (i.e. GRFA) Variance The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council overturns the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details iri regard thereto. On an appeal, the Town Council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, have or have not been met. Should the Town Council choose to overturn the Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, .Vail Village Filing 1; the Community Development Department recommends the Town Council make the following findings: "1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District, since the residence was originally constructed under Town of Vail jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the gross residential floor area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to increase the size limits for structures within the Two-Family Residential District and the existing residence exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions in excess of the gross residential floorarea limits also exceed the site coverage limits as furtherdiscussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. 2. The granting of this variance will notbe detrimental to the public health, safely, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6 3. This variance is not warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning. Regulations, Vail Town Code, since the residence was originally constructed under Town of Vail jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the gross residential floor area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to increase the size limits forstructures within the Two-Family Residential Districtand the existing residence exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions in excess of the gross residential floor area limits also exceed the site coverage limits as further discussed in the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, since the residence was originally constructed under Town of Vail jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the gross residential floor area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to increase the size limits forstructures within the Two-Family Residential District and the existing residence exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions in excess of the gross residential floor area limits also exceed the site coverage limits as furtherdiscussed in the Staffinemorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, since the residence was originally constructed under Town of Vail jurisdiction with Town of Vail design review approval, the gross residential floor area regulations were amended in August of 2004 to increase the size limits forstructures within the Two-Family Residential District and the existing residence exceeds these limits, and the proposed additions in excess of the gross residential floor area limits also exceed the site coverage limits as furtherdiscussed in the Staffinemorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated July 25, 2005." VII. ATTACHMENTS A. June. 27, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum B. June 27, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting results C. July 25, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum D. July 25, 2005, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting results E. Public Notice 7 Attachment: A MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department. DATE: June 27, 2005 SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located. at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC05-0047) Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Planner: Bill Gibson SUMMARY The applicants, Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects, are requesting a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18; Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of the setback variance request; approval, with conditions, of the site coverage variance request; and denial of the GRFA variance request subject to the findings noted in Section IX of this memorandum. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicants, Robert Stephenson, Jr, and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects, are proposing to construct a garage .addition to Units 18A (Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus a new entry, elevator, and bedroom addition to Unit 18A: The new garage addition will widen the existing three car garage to the west toycreate a four car garage (two spaces per dwelling.unit). Above this garage addition the applicant is proposing to construct a new 272 sq. ft. bedroom and bathroom. To the west of the proposed garage addition the applicant is proposing to construct a new 110 sq. ft. single-story front entry room with a 42 sq. ft. three-story elevator addition. The applicant is also proposing to widen the existing driveway and construct a new exterior stair from the driveway to the third-floor entry to Unit 18A. The proposed garage addition to Units 18A and 18B encroaches into the front setback and exceeds the allowable site coverage for this property. The proposed entry and elevator on Unit 18A exceed both site coverage and GRFA, and the bedroom addition also exceeds the allowable GRFA. A vicinity map (Attachment A), site photographs (Attachment B), amore detailed description of the applicant's request (Attachments C), and the proposed architectural plans (Attachment D) have been attached for reference. III. BACKGROUND This two-family residence was originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976 and construction was completed in 1978. The original approved architectural plans blend the overlapping garage level (finished floor elevation 8267') and the mechanical level (finished floor elevation 8277') into one "basement plan" even though these levels are separated by a floor-to-floor .measurement of 10 feet. According to the Town of Vail's records, this structure was originally allowed 5,261 sq. ft. of GRFA. However, 5,491 sq. ft. of GRFA was constructed and a final certificate of occupancy was issued. Therefore, in 1978 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA by 230 sq. ft. , It is unclear how the GRFA was calculated for this structure at that time. At some point irr time a party wall was constructed to separate the garage level parking spaces, and a portion of the garage level located directly below the storage room on the mechanical level was converted from a parking space into a storage room (i.e. GRFA). On June 24, 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Even though the Town's GRFA regulations had been amended several times since 1978, GRFA calculations were not done at the time of this variance approval. In 1999, allowed and existing GRFA calculations were conducted. According to Town of Vail records, the allowable GRFA in 1999 for this lot was 5,205 sq. ft., plus each unit was eligible for one "250 Addition" for a total of 5,705 sq. ft. However, the existing GRFA calculations (including a "250 Addition" for the Schofield residence) were 6,393 sq. ft. Therefore. in 1999, this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA calculations by 1,188 sq. ft. and 688 sq. ft. when two "250 Additions" were included in the calculations. It is unclear how the GRFA was calculated in 1999, but it appears that no portion of the garage level or mechanical level (shown on a single "basement plan" drawing) was counted as GRFA; even though the entire mechanical level qualified as GRFA and the unapproved garage level storage ,room also qualified as GRFA. Recalculating the garage and mechanical levels using 1999 GRFA methods, the structure has 7,500 sq. ft. of GRFA. Therefore, in 1999 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA (plus two "250 Additions") by 1,795 sq. ft. . In 2004, the Town's GRFA regulations were again amended. Under these new regulations, this property is now allowed 7,286 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure, including the appropriate portions of the garage level and the appropriate portions of the mechanical level, has 8,801 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure. exceeds today's allowable GRFA by 1,515 sq. ft. The applicant is currently proposing to add an additional 466 sq. ft. of bedroom, entry, and elevator GRFA, thus proposing to exceed the current GRFA limits by 1,981 sq. ft. (approximately 27%). This proposal is scheduled for review by the Design Review Board at its July 6, 2005, public hearing. 2 IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Order of Review: Generally, variance applications will be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission, and then any accompanying design review application will be reviewed by the Design Review Board. Planning and Environmental Commission: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval, approval with modifications, or denial of a variance application, in accordance with Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code. Design Review Board: The Design Review Board has no review authority over a variance application. However, the Design Review Board is responsible for the final approval, approval with modifications, or denial of any accompanying design review application. Town Council: The Town Council has the authority to hear and decide appeals from any decision, determination, or interpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission and/or Design Review Board. The Town Council may also call up a .decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission and/or Design Review Board. Staff: The Town Staff facilitates the application review process. Staff reviews the submitted application materials for completeness and general compliance with the appropriate requirements of the Town Code. Staff also provides the Planning and Environmental Commission a memorandum containing a description and background of the application; an evaluation of the application in regard to the criteria and findings outlined by the Town Code; and a recommendation of approval, approval with modifications, or denial. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that the following provisions of .the Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIONS Article 12-6C: Two-Family Residential (R) District (in part) 72-6C-7: PURPOSE: The two-family residential district is .intended to provide sites for low density single-family or two-family residential uses, together with such public facilities as may be appropriately located in the same district. The two-family residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single- familyand two-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate site development standards. 3 12-6C-6: SETBACKS: In the R district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15'). 12-6C-8: DENSITY CONTROL: A. Dwelling Units: Not more than a total of two (2) dwelling units shall be permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on existing lots less than fourteen thousand (14, 000) square feet. B. Gross Residential Floor Area: 1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on each site: a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first ten thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus b. Thirty eighf (38) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over ten thousand (10,000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen thousand (15, 000) square feet of site area; plus c. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, not exceeding. thirty thousand (30, 000) square feet of site area; plus d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty thousand (30, 000) square feet. 12-6C-9: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total site area. Chapter 12-17: Variances (in part) 12-17-1: Purpose: A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions. on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. 4 VI. SITE ANALYSIS Address: Legal Description: Zoning: Land Use Plan Designation: Current Land Use: Lot Size: 1448 Vail Valley Drive Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1 Two-Family Residential Low Density Residential Two-Family Dwelling 21,045 sq. ft. (0.48 acres) Standard Allowed/Reouired Existin Setbacks (min): Front: 20 ft. Sides 15 ft. Rear: 15 ft. Height (max.): 30 ft./33 ft. Density (max): ~ 2 dwellings GRFA (max): 7,286 sq. ft. Site coverage (max.): 4,209 sq. ft. Landscape Area (min.): 12,627 sq. ft. Parking (min.): 18A (West) 4 18B (East) 3 20 ft. 29 ft./ 21 ft. 53 ft. 2 dwellings 8,801 sq. ft. 3,843 sq. ft. Proposed 17 ft. 22 ft./ 21 ft. no change no change 9,270 sq. ft. (+466 sq. ft.) 4,488 sq. ft. (+645 sq. ft.) 4 (2 enclosed)4 (2 enclosed) 2 (1 enclosed) 4 (2 enclosed) VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zoning North: Residential Two-Family Residential South: Mixed Use N/A (White River National Forest) East: Residential Two-Family Residential West: Residential Two-Family Residential VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code. A. Consideration of Factors Regarding Variances: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. This proposed addition is associated with a remodel of an existing residence originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976 with construction completed in 1978. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition that, due to the orientation of the structure to the property line and Vail Valley Drive, encroaches three feet into the required 20 foot front 'setback. In 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed 5 setback variance for this proposed garage addition will not be detrimental to the existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. This proposed garage addition 'will cause the structure to exceed the maximum allowable site coverage for this property. .However, the proposed garage addition will increase the existing three car garage to a four car garage (two spaces for each dwelling unit) which is one the Town's development objectives encouraged by the Towri's zoning regulations. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed site coverage variance necessary for this garage addition will not be detrimental to the existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. This existing residence currently exceeds the allowable GRFA for this site by 1,506 sq. ft., which is 21%GRFA than is allowed for other residences in the same zone district. The .applicant is proposing the addition of a new entry, elevator, and bedroom that will further increase the non- conformity of this property. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this request; the structure will exceed the allowable GRFA by 1,972 sq. ft. This is 27% more GRFA than is allowed for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does not believe deviations from the GRFA regulations to this degree are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the Two-Family zone district. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance request and site coverage request associated with the proposed entry, elevator, and bedroom are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the neighboring properties. compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. , The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition that, due to the orientation of the structure to the property line and Vail Valley Drive, encroaches three feet into the required 20 foot front setback. In 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed setback variance is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment. among sites in the vicinity or to attain the Town's development objectives. As the Planning and Environmental Commission has historically approved several similar setback variance requests, Staff does not believe approval of this request will constitute a grant of special privilege. This proposed garage addition will cause the structure to exceed the maximum allowable site coverage for this property. However, the proposed garage addition will increase the existing three car garage to a four car garage (two spaces for each dwelling unit) which is one the 6 Town's development objectives encouraged by the Town's zoning regulations. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed site coverage variance necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the Town's development objectives. As the Planning and Environmental Commission has historically approved several similar setback variance requests, Staff does not believe approval of this request will constitute a grant of special privilege. This existing residence currently exceeds the allowable GRFA for this site by 1,515 sq. ft.; which is 21 % more GRFA than is allowed for other residences in the same zone district. The applicant is proposing the addition of a new entry, elevator, and bedroom that will further increase the non-conformity of this property. ~ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this request; the structure will exceed the allowable GRFA by 1,981 sq. ft. This is 27% more GRFA than is allowed for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does not believe deviations from the GRFA. regulations to this degree are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the Two-Family zone district. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance request and site coverage request associated with the proposed entry, elevator, and bedroom are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the neighboring properties. Staff also believes approval of the proposed GRFA variance request and site coverage request associated with the proposed entry, elevator, and bedroom would be a grant of special privilege. As this property already exceeds the maximum allowable GRFA, so does not believe a further increase is appropriate. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Staff does not believe this proposal will have a significant impact on the public health; safety or welfare, public facilities, utilities, or light and air in comparison to existing conditions of the site. 4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. The design review application associated with this proposal is tentatively scheduled for review by the Town of Vail Design Review Board at its July 6, 2005, public hearing. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: That the ,granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 7 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement.of the specified regulation. would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Setback Variance The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the~following motion: The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto, subject to the following condition: 1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the design review application associated with this variance request. Should the .Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes ' the following findings: The Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance .will not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District. 8 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c. The strict interpretation-or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Site Coverage Variance The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of a variance from Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request for a variance from. Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto, subject to the following condition: 1. This approval shall only be for the approximately 124 sq. ft. of additional site coverage necessary for the construction of the proposed garage addition. The additional site coverage granted by this variance shall not be used to accommodate the construction of any other addition to this structure. 2. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the design review application associated with this variance request. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 9 The Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title ~12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the speciled regulation would deprive. the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Density Control Variance The Community Development Department recommends denial of a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant's request for a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 10 The Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would .not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances . or conditions applicable to. the same. site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant's Request C. Site Photographs D. Architectural Plans E. Public Hearing Notice 11 :.-. 1.... .. Attachment: B .~ ~'`: l L1~ S ~ _ ~ .S t ~ ~ ~ t `~ I ~~ ~ ' ' t ... ~ ~ -~- F: ~: ~.r `~ x" r ~ ,~~ -s ~ 3 ~ ~ ~~, ~~~ i i ,.~`~D~~r 4 i ++ T T~i^ +t !. ? {~ ~ ~~~ a ,,c _ ;~~i~.i ~` ' y t 1 i• ~~ d~t~ . ~ - -.., ... ~~~ . wh. .~F ,. ,, ~k ~~-. ,.,a ; ._. _ ?_~ ~~~1 ,.,~ i. ~~l ~ f '` til ~~ ~r ..~ ~. , ~ `- ~ 1 .1 ~~ ~ y~ ~~4 1 7 ~ ~ ~~`` ~i ~ ~k . ; ~ ~ . ~ . ,a ~~~ X ~';'~'~1 ~ ~' ~ ~ ,~ 1w J ~ ~ ,~ + I.y ~ ~,.~,~, I :I._ J C \ i r..~ .,,, f t ~,~ ~„ - ,,,t ~. ',~: ~~ _ _ .- {. ' ~' ~~ .~. ~' r,~ '' ~A ~ t ttT~~.. ~` f ;~ } ~,: ., ~,~: .:. ~ - t.-: ~~ ~, ~ ... r ~ ~\ ... z ~r tom, ~~~ ~ i-~ ~-~i 4 r ~ ~ ~ ~ _. .may :- , ~ ~~>. ` ~ t ;~~ r~,. sg ~,, ~. ~.~ ~ ~x ~: y; ~~ ,-- ,~- -: ~ -~_t ~ ,s ~a~ { E ~ _ ^ ~.+ ,r ~rs: ._,~ ,~ ~,, ,`7~~„ti ~. .:~ fir.; r i t / ~' 1 ti. 4 w .... jam` r~~. T i ~q./,~T(~J~j, .. y ~i~7 J ~, ~ w ,'M ,"'/w' -.. _ ~ -+~y,' :.P ~ fib? 1 ~. r ~-- Attachment: C _ _ _ ~{ ,. ~ ~~ ~ ~~ The duplex on Lot 18 was built in 1976. The owner of 18A is proposing to enlarge the very small 3-car garage for 18A (2 spaces) and 18B (1 space), add a ground level entry with elevator and a guest bedroom. This proposal requires 3 variances: FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE The owner of 18A, with full support of the owner of 18B, is proposing expanding the existing 681.9 sq. ft. 3-car garage (2 cars for 18A and 1 car for 18B) to 1,176.12 sq. ft. for 4 cars. This addition meets the Town of Vail parking standards for 2-car garage.per unit. This addition requires the cooperation of both owners and due to the existing garage location, there is no other alternative for expanding. This variance is for the northeast corner of the existing garage, expanding 2.5 feet to the north. This increases the garage depth from 20 feet to 22.5 feet. a. This variance improves the use for today's larger cars and updates the use and appearance of the existing structure. The upgrades-are in keeping with neighborhood standards. b. There is no other location for the garage expansion. c. There is no effect on light and air. d. This is exactly what the Town of Vail planning policies and development objectives encourages. SITE COVERAGE VARIANCE: for 279.25 sq. ft. Lot 18 allowable site coverage 4,209 sq. ft. Lot 18 proposed site coverage 4.488.25 sg. ft. Variance 279.25 sq. ft. The proposal includes 155 sq. ft. for an entry and elevator for 18A and 490 sq. ft. for the garage addition. a. This variance improves the use and appearance of the existing structure. b. The expanded garage meets the Town of Vail parking standards and achieves compatibility with the neighborhood. c. This variance does not affect light and air. d. This variance meets the Town of Vail parking standards and complies with the intent of the Town of Vail planning policies and development objectives. PO Box 3340 Vail, Colorado 81658 Phone: 970-476-2201 Fax: 970-476-7491 GRFA VARIANCE: for 1,830.59 sq. ft. GRFA Existing GRFA for 18A and 18B 8,647.44 sq. ft. Allowable GRFA 7,285.85 sq. ft. Proposed GRFA for 18A and 18B 9,116344 sq. ft. This duplex has two levels below grade; the garage level and the mechanical room level. The mechanical level is completely below grade. This level should not be included in the GRFA calculations under the new Town of Vail planning objectives. 18A Mechanical Level GRFA 521.2 sq. ft. 18B Mechanical Level GRFA 1,272.6 sg. ft. , 1,793.8 sq. ft. should be deleted This would leave a 36.2 sq. ft. (1,830.5 [requested variance] - 1,793.8 sq. ft.) GRFA for development improvement to a 30-year old building for a ground level entry (the existing is 2 levels up) and a new elevator and new guest room. . a. This variance request would have been included in the old 250 sq. ft. variance for anon-conforming building. The remodeling and improvements of this property is in keeping with the other structures in the vicinity. b. This variance and interpretation of the mechanical level is in keeping with the intention of the Town of Vail planning objectives and the Town of Vail's encouragement of upgrading 30-year old properties. c. This variance does not affect light and air. d. THIS IS EXACTLY THE INTENT OF THE NEW TOWN OF VAIL PLANNING POLICIES AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES. nw~ia ar v.../ Q, l0T 19 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE m •.n..l UNPLATTED CURVE TABLE <uxK N~DiuS L(xDM Cxpy DC~RIMD DR*~ ~K~~= ~ ~~ GRAPFBC SCALE 111.a~ n~In to~ty ua,c ~ ~m::~ro..'~. a .,~ ..m .,.cns r1 R crm.rte 517E COVERAGE ufdl SpUARE FEET A0RE5 PERCENTAGE iB4 • 1 x ~~ ~ 190-- UNIT pRI VE WAY 1 1. 1~ 1. 1B TOPOGRAPHIC MAP k ILC IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTTFICATE LOT IBA, LOt 188, PARCEL IRC. BLOCK VAB. VALLEY FIRSf FILING EAGLE COUNtY, COLORADO we l><s R[M~Fa.~ SREEt t of I D 3 v Ug7= a d ~~ `~ a .s a 0 F 3 A ~~ 9~ b°_['AP~ S ta,P.N „~ } .i. (7 2 J li. H Z ~ O . F- ~ ~ W O Q J W Q U Z J W Q O ~ N w ~"~ O ~ Y O Z U z m O O = ao V a W ~ '~ ~ 0 ~ ~ _g ~ , g. b ~ ~~ A 1 i ~-- M~-'htANICAL• Ib i7 _~ ~ AY MUb ISM d+tzi~+~~~~~~~~J~~~[[~~~~ s(ap~6 MK~VJ-IIGhI. roFVSm ...,~, IbA t i ~~ -1--- _a j !F idx, gn.~e+~ I~"e 'tan ~ t~xwyrlrY 2G/+r= I P~ow~l"( ~ ~ ' er.~.. I ~ ibn I ~"-" 4ri i fPOR+tKD hLgNM - hD.75A -_ ~a~ _I . .. ~ _..._ ~..p _ , 28.It .- - - ~_. _._. _ MUb Y~1.1 ~---- ~-~ --,~~~.m.,z -f- r----- --t i~~l I ! ~ , I I ~ I r ~r-+~.v •~ ~orz I I 'h4Pk.~E - Ib h . _ i ~ I I ~ I ~ __II I I i ~ I ~ 1___-_ _L~ ~ ~ ~ -z-_ J_-_ e :; AI ~ - - -- - - -- ~d*PAC~ I.~~L ~ Mt-IrtW~llcnl.- L~-"~L 4Io U 7~~ K~ e c ~~ N n~ V Z J LL F- Z ~ 0 H ~ ~ W Q J ~..~ W Q ~ G ~ w M 0 ~ Y °mo 0 = ao U W H "`~ N O ~ r$ '~ ~~~ A2 U ~~ a a~ ~~ v _c 0 g OBa~F A M~ O fA a ~- V Z J LL H Z ~ O. F:. LL 0 } ~ W Q J W Q U Z J W Q O w~">O ~ Y ~ Z m O O = ao V a r' W H J F- O Q fn J > ~ o~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ A'3 [717 ~~ ~~`_. '~ ~\- Ibb Al .....____ __ ~ 1~1 C1bG _._ _- e~- 0 ~ -- mu ~yCCH4~ s+s~4.~' 7' L-~ ! L- i r~~e~ i ~r0 µ I I ~ . I ~ L-____ y _ _ Ib D~a L-l3VbG ADDiTWI~ _..... _ _ Y(I1KO'~ M~11 a~rm'ic -Z ~- ® ® ^ ~ ~ MPCHMI_ Ib~L .F, a ® ~ ~~NB VCNS1rp- vepJNlNe wtw ~~b, no~fH ~I~EVA'("lOh1 ------~, _-ir,~, - U a ~a ~~ m c 3 v 0 ~ ~~ g3 N _Z J z~ i ~ LL Q Q llJ Q J U ~ 2 J_ ^a ~ ~ ~ Y QO Z V J Z ~ OLL =ooU _J F- O Q to J ~ o ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~ w U p~ a 77dy ~~ c 0 ~ a ~ ~~ di ~~e ~_. ___ p~iH.3 rMirfep -~- ~ -_ ~.~~r ~ _ ~~ ~11py br c~ ~ ~~~~ _... ~ rn~a-~_. b?/h 6~ -!~ e• i I -.\.. ~.____..__.__._.~._... _. _. _______._.___... _l V Z LL H O ~ f= ~- o ~ o w Q J V ~ ICI Z r W Q ~ ~ W °"~ O i ~ X D y ~ O Z m ~ = oo U W F- J N ~ O~ ~ ~~ A5 lam ~~y(~IDN 63H.o . e~ia.n' 02'14. b esa~.v'.. 6iy .O~. a ~ ~~ yU ~ Q C 6 O Z 4 O d ~ ~~ O C u~ fn > O Z J F"' Z _O . ~"' LL ~ W a J W a U > Z J W Q ~ ~ w<"~O ~ Y ~ Z m O W O = ao" U a ,.. W F- J Boa fn J ~ oe E fl ~ . ~ - A6 b01~, a ~. OL16.o~ A bLbD.t~. ~7te L bLr ~.an U n: ~~ ~ a c 3 qq~gg8g8 R N n~ Z J lL L~ Z ~ O_ 0 ~ W Q J W Q U > Z J W Q O ~ N w ~"~ O ~ Y ~ Z V. Z m 0 = ao U a ~' W F- J ~ O Q fn J ~ r o ~ ~ ~~ A7 IS F~ ov~lOF~- Ya,P~ ,.. . ~~ ,. I i ~. ~1 I. I~ .~. ,. _.:~~ ., ~:~ . ~; Attachment: E ~~ TOWN of YAIL ~'~ THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE. IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of .Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6,. Vail Town Code, on June 27, 2005, at 2:00 pm; in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant .to Chapter 13=12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an amendment to an existing. platted building envelope, located at 1463 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 88, Lion's Ridge Filing 4, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert and Kristine.Selby, represented by John Martin Architect, LLC Planner: Bill Gibson ~ ' A request for final review of a floodplain modification, pursuant to Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, to allow far the bridge reconstruction, located at the Westhaven Drive Bridge and Pedestrian/Skier Bridge (a more complete description is available at the Department of Community Development offces); and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Cascade Village Metropolitan District, represented by Lonco, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12- ~~`'~'~ 6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, ~I4~ti7 Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley 1 Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Ullage Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. ~ U Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon 8~ Hopkins. Architects Planner... ~ Brill Gibson A request for a final review of . a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-4, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second Floor and Above, Vail Town Code, to allow for a professional office and studio, located at 450 East Lionshead Circle (Treetops Building), Lot 6, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. ' Planner. Bill Gibson A request for a final review of a conditional use. permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Parking, Vail Town Code, to allow for a revision to the approved parking plan at the Vail Valley Medical Center, located at 181 East Meadow Drive/Lots E and F, Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: Matt Gennett Attachment: B PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING June 27, 2005 (Excerpt) 5. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant:Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon 8~ Hopkins Architects Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Tabled to July 11, 2005 MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 6-0-0 Bill Gibson presented the project according to the memorandum. Pam Hopkins introduced the project. She explained the scope, background, .and reasoning for project. John Schofield further explained the variance requests, adding that some discrepancy regarding the GRFA could be related to the fact that the methods for calculating GRFA within the Town have changed many times. He commented that a similar setback variance had been granted for this lot and similar site coverage and GRFA variances had been approved for other lots. He explained how he believed the below grade portions of the house should not count as GRFA. No public comment was added. Bill Jewitt commented that he was in opposition to constructing an additional bedroom through a GRFA variance. Regarding the lowest level basement argument, he mentioned his support of changing the GRFA regulations. However, Regardless, his opposition to a GRFA variance remains. Regarding site coverage, he had some difficulty in determining the hardship that was used to constitute a variance from the regulations. Rollie Kjesbo agreed that any square footage below grade should not be calculated as GRFA. However, the currently non-conforming state of the residence's GRFA should not allow a variance for further non-conformity. Regarding the site coverage variance request, the fact that the residence was built within the Town of Vail negated a request for such a variance. George Lamb agreed with the Commissioners who had already spoken, stating his faith in Staffs calculations. In terms of site coverage, he expressed interest in site coverage variances which were granted to properties that were built in the Town and according to Town regulations. The parking situation would be improved by the construction of a garage, however. He was in favor of some solution, but thought that it should not include increased GRFA. David Viele commented that he was not necessarily in agreement with the new GRFA regulations. However, the applicant did not show a hardship that warranted a variance from such regulations. Chas Bernhardt commented that he would like to see the item tabled and proposed somewhat differently at the following meeting. John Schofield added that perhaps simply an entry elevator and a garage could remain a part of the proposal. Bill Gibson clarified that the elevator would be calculated as GRFA on each level of the structure. Bill Jewitt commented that the' GRFA request may be more palatable if the site coverage variance was eliminated. Pam Hopkins replied that one of the Town's wishes was to enclose parked vehicles. John Schofield said that site coverage was available upon the lot for a garage and the entry elevator. Doug Cahill asked if the applicant would be willing to table. the, item, to which the applicant replied affirmatively. 2 Attachment: C MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: July 25, 2005 SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC05-0047) Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Planner: Bill Gibson SUMMARY The applicants, Robert~Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon 8~ Hopkins Architects, are requesting a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3; Vail Village Filing 1. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, .'the Community Development Department recommends approval, with conditions, of the setback variance request; denial, of the site coverage variance request; and denial of the GRFA variance request subject to the findings noted in Section IX of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST On June 20, 2005, the .Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the applicants' proposal to construct a garage addition and widen the driveway for Units 18A (Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus construct a new entry, elevator, and bedroom addition and a new exterior stair case for Unit 18A. This previous proposal required variances from the setback, site coverage, and GRFA standards of the Two-Family Residential District. The Commission was generally supportive of the setback variance request; however, the Commission was not favorable toward the requested GRFA and site coverage variances. Since that meeting, the applicant has amended the proposal by eliminating the proposed bedroom addition and extending the elevator to all floors of the building. The applicants, Robert Stephenson,. Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects, are proposing to construct a garage addition to Units 18A (Stephenson) and 18B (Schofield); plus a new entry and elevator addition to Unit 18A. The new garage addition will widen the existing three car garage to the west to create a four car garage (two spaces per dwelling unit). To the west of the proposed garage addition the applicant is proposing to construct a new 100 sq. ft. single-story front entry room with a 45 sq. ft. five-story elevator addition (total of 225 sq.ft.). The applicant is also proposing to widen the existing driveway and construct a new exterior stair from the driveway to the third-floor entry to Unit 18A. The applicant is requesting a 2% encroachment into the front setback, a GRFA variance for an additional 325 sq. ft. (the structure currently exceeds the allowable GRFA limits), and a. site coverage variance for an additional 129 sq. ft. The applicant's revised architectural drawings have been attached for reference (Attachment A). III. BACKGROUND This two-family residence was originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976 and construction was completed in 1978. The original approved architectural plans blend the overlapping garage level (finished floor elevation 8267') and the mechanical level (finished floor elevation 8277') into one "basement plan" even though these levels are separated by a floor-to-floor measurement of 10 feet. According to the Town of Vail's records, this structure was originally allowed 5,261 sq. ft. of GRFA. However, 5,491 sq. ft. of GRFA was constructed and a final certificate of occupancy was issued. Therefore, in 1978 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA by 230 sq. ft. It is unclear how the GRFA was calculated for this structure at that time. AY some point in time a party wall was constructed to separate the garage level parking spaces, and a portion of the garage level located directly below the storage room on the mechanical level was converted from a parking space into a storage room (i.e. GRFA). On June 24, 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback variarce to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages: This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Even though the Town's GRFA regulations had been amended several times since 1978, GRFA calculations were not done at the time of this variance approval. In 1999, allowed and existing GRFA calculations were conducted. According to Town of Vail records, the allowable GRFA in 1999 for this lot was 5,205 sq. ft., plus each unit was eligible for one "250 Addition" for a total of 5,705 sq. ft. However, the existing GRFA calculations (including a "250 Addition" for the Schofield residence) were 6,393 sq. ft. Therefore in 1999, this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA calculations by 1,188 sq. ft. and 688 sq. ft. when two "250 Additions" were included in the calculations. ~ It is unclear how the GRFA was calculated in 1999, but it appears that no portion of the garage level or mechanical level (shown on a single "basement plan" drawing) was counted as GRFA; even though the entire mechanical level qualified as GRFA and the unapproved garage level storage room also qualified as GRFA. Recalculating the garage and mechanical levels using 1999 GRFA methods, the structure has 7,500 sq. ft. of GRFA. Therefore, in 1999 this structure exceeded the allowable GRFA (plus two "250 Additions") by 1,795 sq. ft. In 2004, the Town's GRFA regulations were again amended. Under these new regulations, this property is now allowed 7,286 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure, including the appropriate portions of the garage level and the appropriate portions of the mechanical level, has 8,801 sq. ft. of GRFA. The existing structure exceeds today's 2 allowable GRFA by 1,515 sq. ft. The applicant is currently proposing to add an additional 466 sq. ft. of bedroom, entry, and elevator GRFA, thus proposing to exceed the current GRFA limits by 1,981 sq. ft. (approximately 27%). On June 20, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the applicants' proposal to construct a garage addition and widen the driveway for Units 18A (Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus construct a new entry, elevator, and bedroom addition and a new exterior stair case for Unit 18A. This previous proposal required variances from the setback, site coverage, and GRFA standards of the Two-Family Residential District. The Commission was generally supportive of the setback variance request; however, the Commission was not favorable toward the requested GRFA and site coverage variances. The applicant has since amended this proposal by eliminating the proposed bedroom and extending the proposed elevator to all five stories. IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Order of Review: Generally, variance applications will be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission, and then any accompanying design review application will be reviewed. by the Design Review Board. Planning and Environmental Commission: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval, approval with modifications, or denial of a variance application, in accordance with Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code. Design Review Board: The Design Review Board has no review authority over a variance application. However, the Design Review Board is responsible for the final approval, approval with modifications, or denial of any accompanying design review application. Town Council: The Town Council has the authority to hear and decide appeals from any decision, determination, or interpretation by the Planning and Environmental Commission and/or Design Review Board. The Town Council may also call up a decision of the Planning and Environmental Commission and/or Design Review Board. Staff: The Town Staff facilitates the application review process. Staff reviews the submitted application materials for completeness and general compliance with the appropriate requirements of the Town Code. Staff also provides the Planning and Environmental Commission a memorandum containing a description and background of the application; an evaluation of. the application in regard to the criteria and findings outlined by the Town Code; and a recommendation of approval, approval with modifications, or denial. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Staff believes that the following provisions of the. Vail Town Code are relevant to the review of this proposal: 3 TITLE 12: ZONING REGULATIONS Article 12-6C: Two-Family Residential (R) District (in part) 12-6C-1: PURPOSE: The two-family residential district is intended to provide sites for low density single-family or two-family residential uses, together with such public facilities as may be appropriately located in the same district. The two-family residential district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling, commensurate with single- family and two-family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable residential qualities of such sites by establishing appropriate -site development standards. 12-tiC-6: SETBACKS: In the R district, the minimum front setback shall be twenty feet (20'), the minimum side setback shall be fifteen feet (15'), and the minimum rear setback shall be fifteen feet (15'). 12-6C-8: DENSITY CONTROL: A. Dwelling Units: Not more than a total of fwo (2) dwelling units shall be permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on existing lots less than fourteen thousand (14,000) square feet. B. Gross Residential Floor Area: 1. The following gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be permitted on each site: a. Not more than forty six (46) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first ten Thousand (10, 000) square feet of site area; plus b. Thirty eight (38) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over ten thousand (1 D, 000) square feet, not exceeding fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of site area; plus c. Thirteen (13) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen thousand (15, 000) square feet, not exceeding thirty thousand (30, 000) square feet of site area; plus d. Six (6) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty thousand (30, 000) square feet. 12-6C-9: SITE COVERAGE: Site coverage shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total sife area. 4 Chapter 12-17: Variances (in part) 12-17-1: Purpose: A. Reasons for Seeking Variance: In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations or conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. VI. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 1448 Vail Valley Drive Legal Description: Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1 Zoning: Two-Family Residential Land Use Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Current Land Use: Two-Family Dwelling Lot Size: 21,045 sq. ft. (0.48 acres) Standard Allowed/Required Existing Proposed Setbacks (min): Front: 20 ft. 20 ft. 17.5 ft. Sides 15 ft. 29 ft./ 21 ft. 22 ft./ 21 ft. Rear: 15 ft. 53 ft. no change Height (max.): 30 ft./33 ft. Density (max): 2 dwellings 2 dwellings no change GRFA (max): 7,286 sq. ft. 8,801 sq. ft. 9,126 sq. ft. (+325 sq. ft.) Site coverage (max.): 4,209 sq. ft. 3,843 sq. ft. 4,338 sq. ft. (+495 sq. ft.) Parking (min.): 18A (West) ~ 4 4 (2 enclosed)4 (2 enclosed) 18B (East) 3 2 (1 enclosed)4 (2 enclosed) VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zoning North: Residential Two-Family Residential South: Mixed Use N/A (White River National Forest) East: Residential Two-Family Residential West: Residential Two-Family Residential VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code. A. Consideration of Factors Regarding Variances: 5 1. 2. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. This proposed addition is associated with a remodel of an existing residence originally approved by the Design Review Board in 1976 with construction completed in 1978. The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition that, due to the orientation of the structure to the property line and Vail Valley Drive, encroaches 2'/2 feet into the required 20 foot front setback. In 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed setback variance for this proposed garage addition will not be detrimental to the existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The proposed garage, entry, and elevator additions will cause the structure to exceed the maximum allowable site coverage for this property by 129 sq. ft. Additionally, this existing residence currently exceeds the allowable GRFA for this site by 1,515 sq. ft., which is 21%GRFA than is allowed for other residences in the same zone district. The applicant is proposing the addition of a new entry and elevator that will further increase the non-conformity of this property. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this request; the structure will exceed the allowable GRFA by 1,840 sq. ft. This is 25% more GRFA than is allowed for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does not believe deviations from the GRFA regulations to this degree are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the Two-Family zone district. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance request and site coverage request are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the neighboring properties. compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve The applicant is proposing to construct a garage addition that, due to the orientation of the structure to the property line and Vail Valley Drive, encroaches 2'h feet into the required 20 foot front setback. In 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a front setback variance to allow for the construction of an additional garage bay to the east of the existing garages. This proposed garage encroached 12.5 feet into the 20 foot setback; however, this addition was never constructed. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed setback variance is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the Town's development objectives. As the Planning and Environmental Commission has historically approved several similar setback variance requests, Staff does not believe approval of this request will constitute a grant of special privilege. 6 This existing residence currently exceeds the allowable GRFA for this site by 1,515 sq. ft.; which is 21% more GRFA than is allowed for other residences in the same zone district. The applicant is proposing the addition of a new entry, elevator, and bedroom that will further increase the non-conformity of this property. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this request; the structure will exceed the allowable GRFA by 1,840 sq. ft. This is 25% more GRFA than is allowed for other residences in this same zone district. Staff does not believe deviations from the GRFA regulations to this degree are in keeping with the bulk mass and general character of the Two-Family zone district. Therefore, Staff does not believe the proposed GRFA variance request and site coverage request associated with the proposed entry, elevator, and bedroom are in keeping with the bulk/mass and general character of the neighboring properties. Staff also believes approval of the proposed GRFA .variance request and site coverage •request associated with the proposed entry, elevator, and bedroom would be a grant of special privilege. As this property already exceeds the maximum allowable GRFA, so does not believe a further increase is appropriate. The proposed garage, entry, and elevator additions will cause the structure to exceed the. maximum allowable site coverage for this property by 129 sq. ft. Since the proposed garage addition can be constructed without a site coverage variance, Staff does not believe the proposed site coverage variance is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the Town's development objectives. 3. The effect of the requested population, transportation utilities, and public safety. 4 variance on light and air, distribution of and traffic facilities, public facilities and Staff does not believe this proposal will have a significant impact on the public health, safety or welfare, public facilities, utilities, or light and air in comparison to existing conditions of the site. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. On June 20, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the applicants' proposal to construct. a garage addition and widen the driveway for Units 18A (Stephenson) and 186 (Schofield); plus construct a new entry, elevator, and bedroom addition and a new exterior stair case for Unit 18A. This previous proposal required variances from the setback, site coverage, and GRFA standards of the Two-Family Residential District. The Commission was generally supportive of the setback variance request; however, the Commission was less favorable toward the requested GRFA and site coverage variances.. The applicant has since amended this proposal by eliminating the proposed bedroom and extending the. proposed elevator to all five stories. 7 B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Setback Variance The Community Development Department recommends approval, with a condition, of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley, Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the.evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: The Planning and Environmental Commission approves the applicant's request for a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto, subject to the following condition: 1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving Town of Vail approval of the design review application associated with this variance request. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 8 The Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will not constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Site Coverage Variance The Community Development Department recommends denial of a variance from Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant's request for a variance from Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances; Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard (hereto. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 9 The Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with .the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Density Control Variance r The Community Development Department recommends denial of a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, .Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. This recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section VIII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: The Planning and Environmental Commission denies the applicant's request for a variance from Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential garage addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this variance request, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: 10 The Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The granting of this variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the Two-Family Residential District. 2. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. This variance is warranted for the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not result 'in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. b. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. X. ATTACHMENTS A. Amended Architectural Plans ~^ 11 V j~.~r'J~~'"~ T' ,J Ir ~ (11R NEB. .L •~• \ ~, .t` ~•. •rccv.e 1. ~:, .` \t~~ /~--'~ _l~ . l' ~'~ ~• ti, -~ .I~c..aL~A-•.. _ _- .rte. :~~ G. pFr •.~ i•~ ~ . a -_. •~~ I .III// m. a y -_- 1 ':~ -~». :.i aI ''~ ~`,r•.~ mares •i~, I , hsa+c ~ +x~ ~ ^nir 'q:j i-'I'+~',.~ .~rcaf I ~~ 'asYr ,~'q .' '..I _. C'-.~kr~rJ.D ~% j ~• til' - I'r ' ' ` 4 ~ ~3~ . ;.,,::s " ~ ~ Y I .~%-: •' tea. L'iY' ; ' , .. y j., i ~ NW .IJ~;,4 ' / .6se' 1 ,!I:I. L"fi :rl cf 0 X.'1:;,"~; kyr^-, +tT \•'~ •i•:EC•~G L 4'?.ti~'~ r;-~ ~ ,.' ~;~ ,: nrfEw..:r%it;-:=~ '- "`-' ~J--a'=~-'X'.~.~ lilj<'~Ji'-=r- ~ .: 4nsr+~~~= ....: . ` pkT+Wl, Ife ~ 1 i' .~,~,. _ ~' - b L~tIE~..G~~~ ~ ~Y(~ {~l-ALA C'~__~ltftl -~is~Lo'~ LJ Uo- a ~~' Q N n d U `a LL L ~~ ~.. U Q E ~r L °- ~ _ ~ v a C - yr Q . W ~ e ° po 30 OU c o= ~ ~ ~ ~ Q J _ LJ. W f.. U ~ Z (~ W ~ 0 W W J W J Q N ai 0 Y Q U O O m W = 00 V ~ J ~ ~ J N - n , c ,_ _ uoi;ml N U ~ W •a o~ N .v ? Q] W 7 N ~ S .__ .. y9. O +~(~~ ~ - ~'I-. if g(7prVi6 ~_.___~- ~.- 1 .'t=•:'sY(C1^ It~v ~I ~l:~:Iri::y.s~ •~ :s•F- I ~ I 1 ~ 1 _4~~~ '+Ii ~ ~~_~.4: I ~'_,~,~ __?------- a• I 1 '~ 1r14~ w•.~a=e~3.~~ 1~, .I i~ i ~.._~._~ 1. '; ; I I i ' ! t lI t~ ' ~ t nr•I.:a.:~ 1 ~ I I ~ ' ~; 1 i i! ' ; ~I i i.- ~~...:.E iu,c~u~! .~_. ~~I ll' ~ '~ ~k~. :~ ,-..~r. ~ I ~F..irN c?+k I~r __II -.. __1_ ~, :.,:~ .wu ~ i I I I~ ~_._.. ........_ ... _.. _s~i" . ~ ... .~ _.... _-'-----' - -- - ---~._..._ _~4 ~1..~'..... .•:: ~' T .. .. -----•-- ~ 1 C~?.~r'.(o>% Lr~C~L ;_ i•!I~iti~:Nl~l- I~o`!~L - _,~„~~ U °~ rCi G S g ~ ~ m C SA O 'iVhi§ 3 m$ °c q= f4 n i Z O r Z Q W~ U ~ Z W ~ ~_ W 0 Q J W V.. Q O ' N M 0 ~ Y LPL N O Imo = oo U W ~o~ r O N I ~ N Slola~ WK ~' l7m K N U a ~a a~ a a 0 g ~ m~ a~ Z J LL H N LL } W J J a J Q M Q Y U O ~ J J m ~ 0o U ~ J 0 Q _.! ~ ~ ~ ~ .; O WU y a {gF{ 45Q1, ~m ,{ O ¢ N A3 ,~~ F-~i~ Lr~C~~ CA~~ y~~~, o= a +~ " aK U ~ mLL t U Q C d O O C N D '..Z v o a° o mu fi v>' Z 0 ~ Z 0 J Q ~ W ~,., U ~ Z ~ W ~ N } W W ~ J J ~ Q J ~ W J ~ Q U ~ N ~ ~ Y ~ ~ O w°°o = ao" U r J ~ ~ ~ ~$~ 0 N I ;o~~ a '~ o 'Wm ~~c ~u~i .. L. _.:._ ... MP.~2'f~iz o~tt(~~ ~w (~r.F~ ~c~ U a ~~ H 3° " ^~ m t a` c n 0 S ~ c m c 3 ~~ ~ mU C. O y p] d > V Z J LL F-' N W J J. Q J_ M 0 Y U O O J J m 0 ~ V r F, J O Q J > -o~o~ ~~~: a~ o~ w N~ = w~ s. O CCN C a ~° m a~ =LL a` c n 0 x c 4 O ~? a 3D m U ~IQcb r L~~ ~ _J ~~ L ~..._ t -~ ~--~ k .~-$ J L.. ~ Ls.~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~~~ . ~ _.~ _-_. ~ :.__ _. t..--- ~_ _--.. ~=_==- C__.-- wsira~ Fxx.~m4 g3~~.. pit~4 `Y _ _ C~,~ i_ -. ,~2aT I ;°``;_1`c~t~~j;"-- ~ ~ ,~.'_i. .~-,T~ ~j ,T~ r~-,-rte ~k W''i I~ f !~ r T. , :;~i~:~e•.v .'tle'rt~;a3:N l`kC~Ck~ ~' I.~'~•~:(+ON ,.. .. -- --. ....___.._.. y, - ---- -~j-~-rDg-- r ~.~ FiLc>~ ~j.._ C 0= N ai O ~ J a ~, w ~ U ~ ~ ~. W ~ N } W LL! ~ J J W ~ J 0 ~ to `~ ~ Z V ~ 0 z m o a ao U w a- -, V/ ~ / r c N ~I`I 1 ~ ' ,V a~ ~! o E y gk Z j p} ' G K N ~` YYY '~d~~ol tM3T~'r :JI.IE~3! {~ ~NQryr.f:T ~~ _....~ S~T~ -- ~ F1~~~'~ ~... ~.;~. ra _~ _ _._ __..._' __. _ __ ._._ _._ __ -... _.__J 1 // _~ ~~~ ' i'~/. L I 2!!t~tb a m s~ r 4U Q N C n 0 c m c ~$ o m°~ ~ a= 41 > v `LL r N~N LJ~ W J J J Mo U ~- O ~ J J m ~ 0o U ~ J 1- ~ ~ '~ --, - -- n i p r O U g_ a ~ ~~ § ~ z ~ ' ~ ~w~ Attachment: D PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING July 25, 2005 (Excerpt) 4. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12- 17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting .forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Motion to approve variance for setbacks MOTION: Viele SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0-0 ACTION: Motion to approve variance for site coverage MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 4-1-0 (Jewitt opposed) ACTION: Motion to approve variance for GRFA MOTION: Viele SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 4-1-0 (Jewitt opposed) Additional finding that this variance approval is for an elevator and an elevator entry. Bill Gibson presented an overview of the proposal and the staff memorandum. Pam.Hopkins and John Schofield presented the variance requests and their reasoning for the requests. Commissioner Jewitt was supportive of the setback variance, but not the site coverage or GRFA variances. Commissioner Viele agreed with the applicant that more changes are needed to GRFA regulations, but noted that John Schofield was directly involved in the most recent changes in the GRFA regulations. He noted his personal belief that anything below grade should not count as GRFA. Commissioner Bernhardt agreed that the regulations adopted by the Town Council gave basement deductions to only the lowest level of a house. However, he believes the applicant's proposal meets the intent of the law and is being evaluated in a site specific situation. Commissioner Cahill noted his concern about precedent and his support for variances for the garage. • 1 Attachment: E THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-3, Vail Town Code, on Tuesday, September 6, 2005, at 6:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of: ITEMITOPIC: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of a variance from Section 12-6C-6, Setbacks, Section 12- 6C-8, Density Control, and Section 12-6C-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereib. Appellant: ,Robert Stephenson, Jr. and John Schofield, represented by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects Planner: •Bill Gibson The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site usits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING ,• August 22, 2005 TOiI~Of VAfI. PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME 12:00 pm 1. Staff memorandums were discussed with Commission members; no direction given. MEMBERS PRESENT David Viele Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill George Lamb Rollie Kjesbo Bill Jewitt MEMBERS ABSENT Ann Gunion Site Visits: 1. Vail Corp. - 728 West Lionshead Circle 2. Young Residence -1452 Buffehr Creek Road Driver: George Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm 1. A request for a worksession to discuss a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for proposed text amendments to Title 11, Sign Regulations; Title 12, Zoning Regulations; Title 13, Subdivision Regulations; Title .14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Town Code, for proposed corrections and clarifications to the Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Friede/Bill Gibson ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 MOTION: Viele SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 6-0-0 Rachel Friede gave a presentation regarding the need for aclean-up text amendment to the Town Code. She explained the three tiers of changes to occur: grammatical and spelling changes, clarifications to the Code and policy changes. After a short review of Tier 1, grammatical and spelling changes, PEC agreed that these changes did not need further review. The proposed text amendments from Tier 2 and 3 will require numerous worksessions with PEC in order to understand the proposed text amendments, as well as work out any issues related to said amendments. Friede asked that the worksession be tabled until Sept 12 in order to begin discussion on the specifics of Tier 2. As this is still a work in progress,, with more text amendments to come, PEC will receive a packet of new changes one week before each meeting in order to thoroughly review the text amendments. The Chairman expects that this process may take 4 or 5 worksessions before the proposed text-amendments are formally introduced and a recommendation can be made to Town Council. 2. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Sections 12-7H-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-2, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement or Garden Level, and 12-7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor on Street Level, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of 106 multi-family residential dwelling units, located at 728 West Lionshead .Circle/Lot 2, West Day Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Page 1 Applicant: Vail Corp., represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 MOTION: Viele SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0 Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. The applicant's representative, Jay Peterson, stated that they had no formal presentation prepared for the meeting as they agreed with this being a meeting to get everyone understanding the review process to be used for the project. There was no public comment. The Commission asked several comments regarding how the recently acquired properties by Vail Resorts (Vail Professional Building and Cascade Crossing) would affect the proposal on the West Day Lot. Concerns included circulation if the Frontage Road was relocated ,design changes in the building that might occur if this was to become a new portal to the ski mountain, and concern over approving a conditional use permit for condos on the first floor adjacent to a potential lift which might be better suited for retail. There was a request to present potential zone districts the recently acquired properties might be rezoned to. Jay Peterson stated that at the next meeting their presentation would include response to all the initial questions of the Commission. 3. A request for a final revie Subdivision, Vail Town Code, 5L, Ridge at Vail Subdivision, regard thereto. Applicant: Mike Young . Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: APPROVED MOTION: Kjesbo w of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor to allow fora resubdivision of Lot 1, Cliffside Subdivision and Lot located at 1452 Buffehr Creek Road, and setting forth details in SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0 Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. The applicant, Mike Young, had nothing to add. There was no public comment. The Commission expressed no concerns with the request. 4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of an amendment to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 2.8, Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, to amend the boundaries of the study area to include Evergreen Lodge, located at 250 South Frontage Road West, Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. lApplicant: Evergreen Lodge at Vail, represented by HB Development Company Planner: George Ruther ACTION: RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0 George Ruther gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Page 2 T.J. Brink stated that there may be some issue with sharing loading and delivery. bays due to the hazard materials at the hospital. He also pointed out that requiring the same number of accommodation units may be short sighted. He feels requiring the same amount of floor area would be a better solution to maintaining of accommodation units on the site. The Commission was favorable towards the proposed inclusion of the Evergreen site in the Lionshead Master Plan. They were also in favor of the proposed text amendments. The Commission discussed at length how to retain accommodation units. The Commission suggested that a rental program should made be available to the existing condos and the future proposed units. It was further suggested that thought should be given to designing units with attached accommodation units. The Commission encouraged the Evergreen property owners to work with the hospital, however, the Commissioners did not want to see the two sites tied to one another. The Commissioners believed that the quality of units available for lodging is most important; not necessarily the sheer number. 5. A request for a final review of a text amendment to Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-3, Amendments, to increase the height limitation for a sloping roof from 48' to 56' in the Public Accommodation zone district, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: George Ruher ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0 6. A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7B-5, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for the operation of a private club, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Remonov & Company, Inc., represented by Knight Planning Services, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele ~ VOTE: 6-0-0 7. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12=6F-6, Setbacks, 12-6F-9, Site Coverage, 12-6F-10, Landscaping and Site Development, 12-6F-11, Parking, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 4110 Spruce Way/Lot 24, Block 8, Bighorn Addition 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Michael and Elizabeth Taggart Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEBMER 12, 2005 MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0 8. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow fora major amendment to Special Development District No. 22, Grand Traverse, modifying the GRFA calculations for the District; increasing the number of lots for the District; and a final review of a minor subdivision, pursuant to Section 13-4-2, Procedure, Vail Town Code, to modify the size of Lot 5, Amended Final Plat, Dauphinais/Mosely Subdivision Filing 1, a resubdivision of Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Grand Traverse Homeowner's Association, represented by Pat Dauphinais Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2005 MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0 Page 3 9. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow fora major amendment to Special Development District No. 22, Grand Traverse, modifying the GRFA calculations for the district; and a final review of a minor subdivision, pursuant to Section 13-4-2, Procedure, Vail Town Code, to modify the sizes of Lots 4 8~ 5, Dauphinais-Mosely Subdivision Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Grand Traverse Homeowner's Association, represented by Pat Dauphinais Planner:. Warren Campbell ACTION: WITHDRAWN 10. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-9, Site Coverage, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a new fireplace and chimney, located at 175 Forest Road/Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1, 'and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Jack and Karen Ryan, represented by Michael Suman Planner: Elisabeth Eckel ACTION: WITHDRAWN 11. Approval of August 8, 2005 minutes ACTION: APPROVED MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0-0 12. Information Update • Handout 13. Adjournment MOTION: Viele SECOND: Lamb VOTE:.6-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail. Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published August 19, 2005, in the Vail Daily. Page 4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA August 17, 2005 ~~~~ ~ 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC WELCOME PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Sherry Dorward Joe Hanlon Pete Dunning Lynne Fritzlen Margaret Rogers SITE VISITS 1. Vail Townhouse Condominiums - 303 Gore Creek Drive 2. Musson Residence - 2460 Bald Mountain Road 3. Stein Residence - 2375 Bald Mountain Road 4. Lupine Drive Duplex - 3877 Lupine Drive 5. Purchase Residence - 4418 Columbine Drive 6. 801 Timberfalls, Inc. - 4516 East Meadow Drive 7. Oberlohr Residence - 2179 St. Moritz Way 8. Weyrauch Residence - 2417 Garmisch Drive 9. Roley/Skaggs Residence -1835 West Gore Creek Drive 10. Lot 1 Forest Place - 618 Forest Place 11. Vail Spa Condominiums - 710 West Lionshead Circle 12. Montauk Seafood Grill - 549 East Lionshead Circle Driver: George PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. AIPP Paint Color 11:30pm 1:OOpm 3:OOpm George 2. Vail Townhouse Condominiums DRB05-0363 Bill Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping) 303 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 5A/Lots 4 and 5, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Family Vail Limited Partnership LP, represented by Snowdon 8~ Hopkins Architects ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 3-0-1 (Dorward recused) CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall coordinate the parking area design with the Town of Vail Public Works department to implement the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan. The applicant shall submit revised plans to the Town of Vail, for review and approval, with the building permit revision application. Page 1 3. Garel/Marston Residence DRB05-0338 ~ 1 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (exterior changes) 2668 and 2670 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 13, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Scott Garel and Charlie Marston, represented by Pinyon Builders, Inc. ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 40-0 4. Vail Spa Condominiums DR605-0091 Elisabeth Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 710 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Spa Condominiums Homeowners Association ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005 MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0 5. Oberlohr Residence DRB05-0366 _ Bill Final review of new construction (single-family residence) 2179 St. Moritz Way/Lot 6, Vail Heights Filing 1 Applicant: Konrad and Monika Oberlohr, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005 MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0 6. Weyrauch Residence DRB05-0367 Bill Final review of new construction (primary/secondary residence) 2417 Garmisch Drive/Lot 14, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing 2 Applicant: Shawn Weyrauch, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005 MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 4-0-0 7. Stein Residence DRB05-0369 Matt Final review of a residential addition (elevator, deck; windows) 2375 Bald Mountain Road, Unit A/Lot 24, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Kenneth Stein and Karen Day, represented by TRD Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0 8. Purchase Residence DRB05-0372 Elisabeth Conceptual review of new construction (primary/secondary residence) 4418 Columbine Drive/Lot 3, Bighorn Subdivision Addition 3 Applicant: John Purchase, represented by Steve Riden Conceptual review; no vote 9. Lot 1 Forest Place DR605-0373 Bill Final review of new construction (single-family residence) 618 Forest Place/Lot 1, Forest Place Subdivision Applicant: Glendore Development, represented by Larry Deckard ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan such that retaining walls within the front setback do not exceed three feet (3') in height. Page 2 10. Musson Residence DRB05-0298 Elisabeth Conceptual review of a residential addition (master suite addition) 2460 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 20, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Paul and Elisa Musson, represented by Mosaic Architects Conceptual review; no vote 11. Roley/Skaggs Residence DRB05-0390 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (deck) 1835 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 20, Vail Village West Filing 2 Applicant: Kevin Roley and Kate Skaggs ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 4-0-0 12. Vail Dover Associates, LLC DRB05-0376 George Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping) One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Vail Dover Associates, LLC, represented by Resort Design Associates ACTION: Tabled to September 7, 2005 MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning VOTE:4-0-0 13. JEC Residence DR605-0302 Elisabeth Final review of new construction (single-family residence) 1386 Buffehr :Creek Road/Lot G-2, Briar Patch Subdivision Applicant: Kemil Rizk, represented by Zehren & Associates ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Rogers SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 40-0 CONDITION(S): 1. The application shall be approved, with the exception of the landscaping plan, which shall return to the Design Review Board for review on September 7, 2005. 14.801 Timberfalls, Inca DRB05-0380 Elisabeth Final review of a residential addition (windows) 4516 East Meadow Drive/Lots 6 and 7, Timbertalls Condominiums Applicant: Haller Construction ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 4-0-0 15. Lionshead Core Site Hotel DRB04-0305 George Final review of a major exterior alteration (public art, signs, outdoor lighting) 675 Lionshead Place/(a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department upon request). Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 4-0-0 CONDITION(S): Approved per plans dated 8/17/05. 16. Montauk Seafood Grill Deck DRB05-0411 George Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 549 East Lionshead Circle/Lifthouse Condominiums Applicant: Bob and Diane Lazier, represented by Tom Ludwig ACTION: Tabled to September 12, 2005 Page 3 MOTION: Dorward SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 40-0 CONDITION(S): Staff Approvals Holden Residence DRB05-0247 Final review of a minor alteration (deck) 1350 Sandstone Drive/Lot G3, Lion's Ridge Subdivision Applicant: Barbara Holden, represented by Ron Kitchell Kendrick Residence DRB05-0342 Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping) 2975 Manns Ranch Road/Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Clinton and Mary Kendrick, represented by Beck Building, Co. Burrows Residence DRB05-0377 Final review of a minor alteration (hot tub) 1370 Sandstone Road, Unit 11/Lot 11, Eiger Chalets Applicant: Aaron Burrows; represented by Maximum Comfort Pool & Spa Snownow, LLC DRB05-0394 Final review of change to approve plans (entry, deck, windows) 2398 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Vail das Schone Filing 2 Applicant: Erik and Heather Priebe Pitkin Creek Condominiums DRB05-0349 Final review of a minor alteration (stairs) 4041 Bighorn Road,'Unit 10E/Pitkin Creek Park Applicant: Pitkin Creek Condominium Association, represented by Rob Steinke Dorner/Headley Residence DRB05-0387 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 1424 and 1426 Moraine Drive/Lot 12, Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision Applicant: Wolfgang Domer, represented by Thomas Headley Village Inn Condominiums DRB05-0281 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 100 East Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Village Inn Condominium Association, represented by Red Eagle Construction Jeranko Residence DRB05-0389 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 2650 Bald Mountain Road, Unit A/Lot 30, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Stanley and Karen Jeranko, represented by Plath Construction, Inc. Laidlaw Residence DR605-0374 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 1724 Geneva Drive/Lot 10, Block O/Matterhorn Village Filing 1 Applicant: Walt Laidlaw ~ . Bill Bill Bill Bill Elisabeth Bill Bill George George Page 4 Prochnow Residence DRB05-0383 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof and repaint) 483 Gore Creek Drive/Lot 7, Vail Village Filing 4' Applicant: Christopher and Ann Prochnow Komppa Residence DRB05-0382 Final review of a minor alteration (siding) 4846 Juniper Lane/Lot 2, Block 5, Bighorn 5th Addition Applicant: Mike Komppa, represented by Kisker Construction, Ltd. Middle Creek Village DRB05-0407 Final review of change to approved plans (handrails) 129 North Frontage Road/Mountain Bell Applicant: Coughlin & Company, represented by Odell Architects Koelbel Residence DRB05-0354 Final review of a residential addition (living room and bedroom additions) 1476 Westhaven Drive, Unit 40/Lot 53, Coldstream Condominiums Applicant: Sherrill S. Koelbel, represented by Aker Architects Kaufman Residence DR605-0355 Final review of a residential addition (living room and bedroom additions) 1476 Westhaven Drive, Unit 39/Lot 53, Coldstream Condominiums Applicant: James M. Kaufman, represented by Aker Architects Erdington Residence DR605-0321 Final review of a minor alteration (siding and deck) 1350 Sandstone Drive, Unit 1/Lot 6-3, Eiger Chalets Applicant: Donald Erdington, represented by Eric Rohwetter Conners/Parker Residence DRB05-0408 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 2427 Garmisch Drive, Units 13A and B/Lot 13A, Block H/Lot 21, Block A, Applicant: Thomas Conners, represented by Master Sealers Nesbitt Residence DR605-0395 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 4352 Spruce Way, Unit #4/Bighorn Subdivision 3~d Addition Applicant: John Nesbitt, represented by Plath Construction, Inc. Baltz Residence DR605-0385 Final review of change to approved plans (windows) 3786 Lupine Drive/Lot 6, Bighorn 2"d Addition Applicant: Steve and Marty Baltz Ogilby Residence DRB05-0384 Filial review of change to approved plans (site plan) 2883 Kinnikinnick Road/Lot 4, Vail Intermountain Subdivision Applicant: Chuck Ogilby, represented by George Sink Matt George Matt Bill Bill Bill Joe Vail das Schone Filing 1 Joe Warren Bill Page 5 Carnie Residence DR605-0397 Final review of a minor alteration (deck) 2603 Cortina Lane, Lot 1, Block A, Vail Ridge Filing 2 Applicant: Jack and Joan Carnie Carnie Residence DRB05-0396 Final review of a minor alteration (driveway) 2603 Cortina Lane/Lot 1, Block A, Vail Ridge Filing 2 Applicant: Jack and Joan Carnie Goss Residence DR605-0409 Final approval of a minor alteration (windows) 174 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Lodge Apartment Condominiums Applicant: Howard Goss, represented by Rzepiejewski & Company Michel Residence DR605-0402 Final review of a minor alteration (skylights) 2743 Kinnikinnick Road, Unit A6/Meadow Creek Subdivision Applicant: Theresa Michel, represented by Highland Builders Corporation Price Residence DRB05-0403 Final review of a minor alteration (skylights) 2733 Kinnikinnick Road, Unit C3/Meadow Creek Subdivision Applicant: Heather Price, represented by Highland Builders Corporation Wisenbaker Residence DRB05-0406 Final review of a minor alteration (repaint and re-roof) 153 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 37, Block 7,m Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Michael Wisenbaker Halpert Residence DRB05-0386 Final review of change to approved. plans (bedroom addition, stairs, entry) 1054 Homestake Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 8) Applicant: Michael Halpert, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Booth Creek Townhomes DRB05-0404 Final review of change to approved plans (mailbox canopy) 2875 Manns Ranch Road/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Booth Creek Townhome Association, represented by TRD Architects Millrace Condominium Association DRB05-0398 Final review of a minor alteration (stairs) 1320 Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village Applicant: Millrace Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects McGlynn/Soden and Haggerty Residence DRB05-0365 Final review of a minor alteration (deck, repaint, driveway, retaining wall and re-roof) 5128 Grouse Lane/Lot 8, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision Applicant: Catherine Haggerty and Ethel McGlynn Warren Warren Joe Bill Bill Warren Bill Elisabeth Elisabeth Warren Page 6 Town of Vail DR605-0414 Final review of a minor alteration (radio tower antenna) 75 South Frontage Road/unplatted Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Paul Smith Staff Denied Bus Stop Pizza DRB05-0392 Final review of a sign 1000 Lion's Ridge Loop/Lot 11, Lion's Ridge Filing 1 Applicant: Vail Run Commercial Ventures Withdrawn White Rock Properties, LLC DRB05-0379 Final review of change to approved plans (retaining walls) 1239 Westhaven Circle/Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6 Applicant: Alan Goncharoff, represented by William Restock Dimond Residence DRB05-0271 Final review of a minor alteration (windows) 917 Red Sandstone Circle, Unit 4C/Sandstone 70 Subdivision Applicant: Nancy Dimond O'Neil Residence DR605-0241 Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 1385 Westhaven Circle/Lot 51, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Patricia O'Neill Warren Bill Bill Bill Matt The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Page 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Stan Zemler, Pam Brandmeyer, Greg Hall, Judy Camp, Gina Davis DATE: September 6, 2005 SUBJECT: Long-Term Capital Analysis, 2005-2020 1. INTRODUCTION As part of the 2006 budget process, Town Council has requested a discussion of long-term capital needs. In particular, Council has inquired about the following: • What assets do we have today and what is their condition? • What are our priorities? • What are our priorities after redevelopment? • What will the priorities be for the next 15 years? Following an overview of the town's asset management philosophy, we are prepared to review long-range projections for available revenue for capital purposes, plus expenditures associated with capital maintenance, capital replacement, debt service and financing, and available funds for new projects. II. ASSET MANAGEMENT The Town of Vail is responsible for the long term care and maintenance of its assets. These assets have a replacement cost valued at $325 million, excluding land values, with another $20 million managed by the Vai! Recreation District. These assets include infrastructure such as streets, bridges, storm sewers, street lighting, signs, bridges and recreation paths. The town also has significant assets in buildings, parking structures, and other facilities such as bus stops, park restrooms, playgrounds, street furniture, planters, fountains, and public art. In addition, the town is responsible for many systems, such as security, computer software and hardware, communications, snowmelt, and irrigation. An extensive fleet of vehicles, buses, and equipment is also cared for. In addition, the town manages its open space lands as well as other parcels. Taking care of the town's existing assets has been an important budgetary responsibility. For example, managers in the Public Works Department are responsible for evaluating short-and long-term needs associated with facilities, transit & parking, streets 8~ bridges, parks, buses, vehicles, and other equipment. These managers recommend schedules for routine and preventive maintenance for inclusion in the capital budget, and, when appropriate, make recommendations for replacement. Attachments are included as examples of the documentation processes used to care for the town's assets and the rationale used to manage the assets. III. WHAT ARE OUR PRIORITIES? Assuming the town's practice of taking care of its existing assets is a desirable priority action to continue into the future, staff has calculated the costs associated with basic levels of capital maintenance and capital_replacement over the next 15 1 .years.. Similarly, projected revenues .available for capital purposes have been calculated. The results show that over the 15-year horizon, approximately 66% of the total available capital dollars are allocated for maintenance, replacement, or debt service on existing assets, leaving approximately 34% for discretionary projects. Discretionary projects are best described as initiatives that create new assets or enhance existing assets. Examples of discretionary projects include Village Streetscape, Donovan Pavilion and the West Vail fire station. Current projections show limited dollars available for discretionary projects in the Capital Projects Fund in the near-term, with more discretionary opportunities beginning in 2012. In reviewing the Real Estate Transfer Tax fund, there are opportunities for more discretionary spending occurring more consistently during the 15-year period, while the capital fund experiences greater fluctuation in these discretionary dollars. It should be noted that the asset management projections place an emphasis on maintenance and repairs to town-owned buildings, rather than replacement. The projections also show an investment in neighborhood street reconstruction during the years 2009-2011, which has been deferred since 2002 to make way for the Village Streetscape project, which was timed to coincide with replacement of aging water and sewer lines bythe Eagle River Water & Sanitation District. IV. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 8~ QUESTIONS . As Council begins to set the agenda for along-term capital strategy, the information provided in this document provides a framework for discussion of several .key findings and questions associated with this preliminary work: • Is the town's prescribed maintenance schedule sustainable over time? • As the town adds discretionary projects, what new demands will be placed on the capital maintenance fund as well as the general fund (heated streets, flowers, staffing, etc.)? • Is the 60-40 split in allocating sales tax collections between the General Fund and Capital Projects Fund sustainable in the future? • How should RETT discretionary dollars be used? • How should Capital Fund discretionary dollars be used? • What criteria should be used to evaluate new projects? • Town debt obligations end in 2012; should the town prepare to take on new debt in 2013 for building replacement, other needs? • How will the town be more attentive to managing the maintenance and replacement of assets operated by third parties, such as the Vail Recreation District? 2 ~~ ~ ~~ Capital Assest Value Bridges Year Built Length Width Rating SO FT Repalcement Bighom @ Pitkin 1989 23 42.5 90.6 977.5 $488,750 Black Gore Drive 1988 30 24 76.4 720 $360,000 Bridge Road 1979 38 34 B6 1326 $663,000 Forest Road 1988 128 35 95.7 4480 $2,240,000 Gore Creek Drive 1990 45 38.75 99.9 1743.75 $871,875 Kinicinick East 1980 61.33 30 89.7 1839.9 $919,950 Kinicinick west 1983 52 32 83 1664 $832,000 Lupine Road 1881 51.5 28 96.7 1442 $721,000 Main Gore Drive 1975 41 30 96 1230 $615,000 Matterhorn 1870 38.5 24.25 40.2 933.625 $466,813 Meadow Drive 1975 41.2 30 90.9 1236 $618,000 Nugget Lane 1981 41 14.25 68.6 584.25 $292,125 Vail Road 1995 64 43.33 79.7 2773.12 $1,386,560 Vail Valley Drive West 1986 42 45 77.7 1880 $945,000 Vail Valley Drive East 1985 61.5 46.5 97.6 2859.75 $1,429,875 Westhaven 1979 96 28.33 69.4 2719.68 $1,359,840 Willow bridge Road 1992 51 45 96 2295 $1,147,500 $15,357,288 Major Draninage Structures @ roadways Big Horn ~ Columbine Bigorn (d Spruce Bighorn ~ Bighorn Rd Booth Creek ~ Booth Creek Dr Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir Mill Creek @ Vail Valley Drive Mill Creek @ Hanson Ranck Mill Creek @ Gore Creek Drive Spraddle Creek System Middle Creek Frontage Middle Creek Frontage Middle Creek Meadow Drive Red Sandstorn @ Vail View Drive Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage Buffher Creek ~ Circle Buffher Creek ~ Chamonix Buffher Creek ~ Frontaage Buffher Creek ~ Frontaage Major Draninage Structures ~ Trails Booth Creeek Mill Creek Middle Creek Middle Creek Red Sandstone Buffeher Creek Buffher Creek Deer Underpass Roadways( 32.4) miles Lineal Feet rated 90-100 Lineal Feet rated 80-90 Lineal Feet rated 70-80 Lineal Feet rated 60-70 Lineal Feet rated 50-60 Lineal Feet rated 40-50 Lineal Feetrated 30-40 Lineal Feet rated 20-30 Lineal Feet rated 10-20 Lineal Feetrated 0-10 Lineal Feet rated poor or fair E Vail Rds to reconst Golf Crse Rds to reconst Value of roadway assest Recreation Paths _Recreation Path(14.7) mile: Recreation Path bridges Parks Playgrounds(9) New (6) Older(3) Picnic shelters Public Art Other Street Llghts Streetscape Snowmeit System Specieman Trees Lineal Feet 10618 68362 38888 20263 10318 7497 5351 2856 216 2847 167426 23010 10112 Percent 8.3% 40.8% 23.3% 12.1% 6.2% 4.5% 3.2% 1.7% 0.1 1.8% 17.4% Less than 60 13.7% 6.0% 32.4 5280 171072 14.7 5280 77616 18 6 3 6 31 1385 300000 350000 100 Vehicles, Systems Computers Radio Equipment Parking Systems Electomic Signs Furniture and Fixtures Parkng Lots 500 Building Assets from Building Master Plan VRD Managed Assets Toatai Asset Value 350 175000 275 150 250000 350000 250000 varies .2500 60 35 20000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150, 000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $3,000,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $520,000 $47,044,800 $11,642,400 $4,500,000 $2,100,000 $750,000 $2,850,000 $300,000 $1,310,000 $3,462, 500 $18,000,000 $12,250,000 $30,250,000 $2,000,000 $17,241,290 $3,500,000 $2,500,000 $950,000 $250,000 $2,500,000 $875,000 $175,000,000 $20,000,000 $345,053,278 \- TOWN OF VAIL BUILDINGS MASTER PLAN SUMMARY 2005 i i _ - ~ -- I '__- __ _ _ __ _ „__ ~ - _-_ !_ _-_ __-__ _ __ , , _ __._ _ - - , I __ ~ _ ~ ~ - -- - ' ------~ Asset DateBuiR ~ ' SizeSF { LifeCycfe CurrentVafue Maintenance_ MalorUpgrade + Yearofremodel i Remodel cost- --- -- - . ' ------- - Replacement j -- Yearlnidal ---- Replacement cost ~Yearreplacement - - - --- --- Replacement cost - - - - - --- - -- - - - ~ ~ , Cast perYear Remodel Cast i 3l41iTe ( ) j year of remodel - Toda_y's Cost I Replacement due year of replacement after remodel (1f3 more) ;year of revised 1l3 more Bus Shelters (15) 1991-1999 I 100 ea 30 r i _ 5247 000 .1 $11,000 _ _ $132,000 , 20142022 ~ $342,396 $280,000 2020 -2029 $1,045 368 12030-2039 $1 702,794 Community Development 1967 _' _ 7 000 - - - 40 yr - ^ $1550 000 - --- - $38,000 _ $930,000 ~ 1997 -_- - $728,619 _ $2,750,000 2007 _ - - - -- - $3,509 774 1, ---- _, 2012: -- - ---- -- - $4,479,460 Donovan Pawhon _ _' - Fire Stationll(MainValq 1 I- _2000 _1971 _j ~ _ 7150 40yr 35yr _ $1,600,0001 1 __-_ ~ $33,0001 _ - $470,000' T-- _2001 , - 2003 ' - $447619 40 5 1 _ _$1,970,000 -- _2040 _ _ 2006 2010 _ _ I _ _~ _ _ $2,394547- _-- 0241141 $2 - --- . 2018;_ 2020 _-. _ _. $4,300,263 068 $3 297 FireStaVOnl(EastVaiq _- -._ 1980 ~ ;- - 7500 - ! ~ 30yr _ ., --$1,650000 i- $28,000 --- I $385,000 ~--_ $ 42 0 _ . - -_$1,370,000!,-- ---- - - -- _-- . i -- - ; - - , , - - Fountains ----- ' -~-----I ------ ~ - _ .. __.. -- ---- -- ~~ ~ --- ~--- L ---.i __.- ! __ r.. -' -- ~ ----- - --- ---- -- -- --- - - - ---- - Children's _ _ Slifer ~ -- -- i J ~- - - - ~ -- ' ~ -- --- - - ~ ---- j -- t _ 1-.- ------ - -{I- -- 1 - ---- - -- ---- - -- -- ~ ----- _ - j ~ - -- ---- I - -- ~ ~ _ - ----- , _ :_ -- ,- - - 1 i ~ I i ~ ~ WallSfreet - i ~-- ~- i --- - --- - -- I I __ _ __ __ _ ___ _ __ ___ ____ _ Mayors Gereld Ford Am hitheater P ~~ 1987 8 2001 ~ 50 yr I _ i _ I - I _ By WF ~ _ _ -_~ I, _ - _ ; - -L --- 2037 -2051 --- -- -- I ------ - _--------- -------- i - - _ - $0 Housing ---- -ii--- - --- --- - --^ 1 - --- ----- -- - --- I I -- T i - ~-- - ' ~ ~ I __ ~~ - - --- - - SO Buzzard Park (24) , -- 1996 I -~ 13,500 r -~--- 30 yr - r $2,386,000 -- ~ $48,000 j _ ----- $7,840,000 2019 --- $17 969,424. - - $2 750,000 ',_ --- --- I 2026 _ T - s 58,869,025 , ------- ~ -- 2036 - -- t---- --- $14,446,707 - ---- _Creekside(16) _ _~ ` S.l_00 20yr 30 _ ~ $211 500 $40.000 ___ _ $7600 5440,1100 _ $44 000 I ___j_-- - - ~ -- _ - _ _ __ ~ I -- - ~ -' - -- $0 SO - Vail Das Schone (1) - 1 - _ 1,100 ~-- yr , _ _ , _ _ - _ r __ __ ^ ~~ -- _ - i , _ _ VaflHeightsll) ~ ~ 750 30yr $144,250 _- - $7,500_ _ $49, 500 ~-._- - _ -... - _ I --- - - -1- --- ~ _ ~ ___ ~__-- _ _ _ SO - __ Innsbruck (11 _ Managers Residence _ _ ___ I T 1979 3,100 ~ 25yr ~ 5812,500 ~ ' $10,500 $170,000 1998 ' $139,859 i - $550,000 ~ I 2003 ' ' ~ - I -- ~ 2011] _ ----- - ~ ----- ~ Library --'-- 1883 ~ r--- 17400 - I - 40 1'r -- $3,820,000 - --- $60,000 ~- _ $990,000 2011 ~-- ~ _ `- 51,5 3.5,815 _ -- T- $4900,000; -- - 2023 ,i - ~ - - --- ^-_ $20,500,0001 - --_... r __2~` ----i---------- 525,200,000 -- _ Lionshea ~ tans o9 Von P . ----- Auxilia Buildin _ 1980 ~ --- 1980 1 ~ - -- - ~ _ - 50 - -- 40~ y __ ' 542,240,000 ------- -- t $460,000 I-_ 104000 ~ ' 51,650,000 -~--~ --- - _ _ ~, 0'00 - -- -- _ _ _ 52,437,801 ' -- ---~- ------~1 $56,500,000 ----~1-~ ------- I- 2030 ----- -- -~ -- 1 $221,487,296 ' ____ _ - -----_ _ -_---$~ - ---- i 2033:, ------• ---------- 2033; _ $256,399,231. ---- _ $0 ~ ColoradoWesl -- --- - I 1980 1,350 y - -- 30 r _~ __ - I $121,000 i __ ~ --- 2010 - ; ~ ~ 2010 -_- ~ --- ~ _ 2033_- _ $0 j Information Cenler - - Moved in 1990 ~ 20 yr - 582,000 -- - - -- - 2005 - -. $D ; - - --~- 2010 I- $0 ----- -- --- 2017] -- `- ---- - $0 , - --- -- --- Misc. Buildings and Sheds - Varies - --_ _- _ _ __ _ --T -__ _$275,000 ~ $30,~ _ - 862,000 ~ 1997 _ ~ $fi4,249 -$330 000 _ 1 _ _ $0 _ _ _ $0~ ___ Munidpal Budd_mg ParkRestroomsQ) - --,--- - 1967 --I----- 11,425 - Vary C r - 40 yr - 25yr - ~ $3,D0000 $200,000 $44,000 r _ $31,000 51400000 - ~ $77,000 1997 - ~ -- $1096,937 $0 $3,850,0011 ~- $220 ODO i 2007 ~ i __ ` $4913,684 - $0 - 2020--- ' $9,265,484 a $0 -- - PoliceDe artment P --- -- -- - j 1992 -~ --~ _ 31,325 ` -- ~ -- y 35 r - - -- 56350_0001 _ - _ $38,000 - 582,500 ~ --. 2018 , $180,087 - -.. __ -~- $6,600,000 J . - 2027 -- - - -I - -- ---- -- - -_ $22,349,943 --- 2039', _. - -- $40,137,2 6 - Public Works ---- -- - - -- Admin Building - ~---- i 1998 . ~ L-- - 5,075 ~_.------ ~- ------ - I - ---- L------- $1 115,000 35y-`' $60,000 i - $82,500 - _ _ __ i - i 2022 SO ~ -- 5216897 ---t---- - $2470,000 2031 $0 - ~ - - - $10166855. _ __ _ -_ _ 2043- __ __ $0 $18,258,211 - -- BusBamlWash - 1996 j 33,250 ~ 30yr ~- $2,272,0001 ~ -- - $275,000 -- 2019 _ _$630305 $3150000 _ 2026 _ -- $1D,159065~ -- 2036- $16,548,046 -- _ _ __ _ _ Shop __ VailTmnsporta6_onCU. _- SkiMuseum _ -~ 1980 197_481990 1990 _ 24,5_00 _ 1 30yr I 50 yr i 35 r y $3,750,500 _ _ I _ _ $69,850,000 $365000 ~- --}-- I _ _ $605,000 2003 ~ 121,200,000 2010 ---~--i--- _ I _ _ $635250 $5150000 ~ _- -- - ' - -1 2010 $179,067,600 $77,000,000 2024.2030 ----; -_ -t-_--- $0. 2025 - -i- ---- - _ _ $_7,608896 _ _ _ ' ~ $301,849,944 --- -- r--- - +- ...-- - -~ ----- - -- 2020 _ _ 2043; __ _ 20387- ~ $12,394089 $56.9,183,087_ - _ --- -. Center I f 6 -._- 1990 -- ---- l 35yr -- -- r _ _ 1 ~ 2116 ~ $0 i 2025 1 ~ 2038, n orma on Termmal Building i 1995 - i 35yr _ -_ ~ - - ; j --- 1- - - ' - 2021 ~--- --- i .--- - -- - .- $D , ~--- 2030 - _ ~ - _- _ ^------- I _ - 2042' _ - - I ~ Totals i $143,080,000 I $962,300. $136,969,5001 $169,8400001 1 A ~'a VAIL RECREATION DISTRICTASSETS 2005 I ------ ~- , ~ I i ~ , , ! I '. ~ ! I _ _____ I I - - - - ~ --- i -` - -~--- i --- -----j I - ~ ---- _ --- Asset -- Date Built ! -I SizeSF ---- Life Cycle - CumentValue I Maintenance I Major Upgrade I Yew ar of remodel ~ Remodel cost - - Rep acl ement ;- Year Iniflal Replacement cast !Year replacement _ - - ;Replacement cost -- - --_ . ~_, I ~ -~ Cost per Year Remodel Cast ! (3141'de) _ year of remodel _ Today's Cost ;Replacement due C year of replacement ',after remodel j113 more]- _ year of revised 113 more I ' I _ r I I ! - __ - - ~,-- ------' --- - '' ~ _ _ - i ~ ---- ~ I I I ~~ ---~ -_ . - I - Ford Park I ~ i - r' i ' f ~-~ - ~ --- _ i -_ - . Resrrooms/Ccncessions 1983 1,004 25 yr J $ 250,000.00 I $75,000 ~ 2002 ! $150,000 $ 300,000.00 2008 $347,287 -- - ImgationSystem 1990 ~ 20yr j _ _~ _ __~- - ~ --- --L _ - - - -- - ~ - Fencing ! 1992 j 2,697__! _ 15 yr ; $ 26,970.00', -. ------- - 2003 i $13,485 $14,868 _ _y$ 53,940.OD, 2007 ~ ~ $59,469 _~ - _.-.-- _ --- - Storege Farelity 1990 I 600 25 yr --I $ 30,000.001 _ _ __' $ 105,000.00 ! _'_-~ ! ___ _- _ -_--_ - ___ Bleachers , 1992- i- ---, - ; I . i I ! I h- -- --- - - _ ~ ! - ~ __ _ - - GoIF Course - ~ I --I -- -~ . ----- $0 - ClubHouse I - 1975-1987 --~----- 6,000 ! - -- ~ 30yr ~- --- $ 1,700,000.00; - - $2,000 ~ 1987 -- --~ - - i ___ _,$ 7,000,000.00, 2D05 $7,000,000 - - -- ------ _ - T- -- - - $0 Cart Bam _ _ ~ 1967 _ ! _7,200 _ ( 30 yr ($ 720,OOD.OO I ___ - r T I $185,000 newra ~ 2009 - - -- $224_b68 $ 1,260,000.00! 2017 ~ V ! - - -- ~ --- - Maintenance Shop --- - 1975-1998 I - - 8,000 i --- 30y r , $ 1,200,000.001 . - - -- --' - ~~ _ _ - i, _ _ $ 2,000,000.001 2006 -- J - ~ $0 tartefsShack - 1987 j --- -- - , 1,60D , ------ - _- _ 30yr - - -*- - - _~ $ 280,000.00; - ----1--- i I --- - _ -- _ __-- $ 480,000.00 --- ~ ~~ _ -----_ -L Caurse Restroom #6 1991 r 1,755 yr 25 ! $ 202 125.001 - $ 347 000.00 _CaurseRestroom#12 _ 1987 1 _ _ ____ 200 I - _ - 25 yr _ , ,r$ 240,000,W I ~ ___ - $ -= __ _~ , 60,000.00 - ~ ! _Retainin _Wall#3 _ _ g _ 1994 __ ~ __ 1,112_-_-_- - _-~ - -20 -- I ' _ _ I ~ - I $ __ 55,000.00 T- I _ ----- --r-- Retainin Wali#1 _ 9 Retaining Wall #15 1994 -- _ I --1- I 2001 l 920 -- I - ---- - 1750 i 20 -~- ---- 20 yr i ---- I__, ----- --- 7 r _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ --- -- ~ ~ _ _ -I S ~ I-'.~ 75_000; I --- - _ _ -- --- -r_ _ Bridge #1 ~ _ -1992 I - 14' x 13' I _ _ --' $ 100 000.00- - - ~-- - _ _ _-__ __ I _ V _- ~ -- _ ~ _ _ _ - ^ _ ~ _ Bridge#2 _ 992 ~ _ 12 x13 _~_ _ ~ $_ 90,000001 _ - -~ -- -_~- - ~--- - - - - -+_ - - ~ -~-_-_ _-_ -~- - _ _- _ - - - -- _ - _- } - ~ - Bnd a #11 small _ 9 1992 ~ i 20 x 8' ~ ! $ 100 DOD,00 I ~ ~ 'i ~ _ _ Bndge #11 walking _ ___ _ 1989_ ~ _ _ _ 40 z 16 ~ _ _ I $ 250000 0~ i ~ - -- L _- - __-_ ^ _ I _ ~ _ --_- - --. __ -- ~ -- bridge#14 1975 ' 45 x 11 ~ $ 20000D,OO _ _ _ ! ~ i -- I ! _ -_ ~ _ _ _ . ~ -- - Bridge#15 - _ _ _ - --- 1975 ?- --; . 45x11 ------,-- --- $ 200,000,001 -~----y - - - -----1- _ I _ ~ ~ -~'- ~---- --- ~~ - --- T 1 I ----~---- - -_- __- ~ - - - --- _ _ _-__- I 8ridge #17 1968 I _-...._ 40' x 10' ..----- j $ 200,000.00 i ------'---- I I --~--------1- ~ 1-_-----'- ~ --j ~ ~ ____ _---~- - - -'-- ----- --'-~-------- --- Lightning Shelter#1 _1970 625_ - _ 20 yr -I $ _ 5,000.00' ~-- - ---- I J~ ------ -- - ~----....---- - I --'--- I -' --- ---- ---------- -- -1- - _ Lighting Shelter #5 __1970 ! 625 I 20 yr I $ 3,000.00 ! ~ I L ~ -Cart Paths__ Im ti t S _ 1998-2 0 25,2841inear ftl ! --~-~- 10 yr - _ r $ 250,000.00 j - - -~ -~----- --- --- - _ _ __- I -T_------ '- T- -- -_ _ - - _ i ---v- -- ---- -_-_-_---- T - - -- ___ ~ ga on ys em - 1970.1986 _ -- 20yr ~---'---^-- ~ - - -~- ' ----- - - ~ -- --- - ! Driving Range -- .1994 ' - - -- .. - -- 20 ~ i ~ -- - --~---- ~-- ---- ( ~ t - ll . - _~ ~ ~ ( - -- ---- ~ - L ----T---- i __ --. I Dobson Ic e Arena ~ B ildi ~ - 1979 2 ~ 5 00 t i~ -----'----_--- '--}------ ?- - - ~-~---- --; r-------- -- --- ~ ---- - ~ _ __ - _ _ , -~-~ ---_--- - g _u n _ - 001 _ ~ 3 ,0 i ^ --yr 50 -~__--_ $ 8,750,000.00 __ $4,375,000 2017 - $ 1 _ QSOO,DOO.OD1_ 2029 $39,201,291 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i - Refrigeration System 1979-2000 I_- 16,000 ' - ~ --_--- ~ -_ -_ ~_ - I - i- - ~ --~,-- --- - _ - -------- _ -----L-- --- GymnasticsCente~ --- 2004~- 9_000 I,I - -40yr .. S 1_700,000.001 - -- - -- I , $850,000 I 2034 ----r• -- ----.- -~--- --- I -~- - - r-- - - --- ~ - _- ~_ $0 I N t C t r---- ----- 197 -- - ---L ~ I 1 - 0 r ---- ~ _ _ $ j--- --' ~ -- _ - --j"` - a ure en er 5 ! r ' - _1,400 _ 20 yr $ 245,000.0 1 j--r- $122,500_! ---r-- I ~ I I 300,000.00 } ~~ _ - ------ ~j TenniaCenter __ B i i t --- - - ~` ' i ----- 3 -- -- ---~--~---- -- ------ ~---_-~ - ~ j -_~ - - {- ~~--- ~ _ u ld ng Tennis Coun4 1991 1995 _ r ' ..-~ -- 3,250 _ I 53,482 -~_ -- 30yr 20 yr $ 98 750_ i $ 3D0,000.00'-_ - - $1,500 _ $446,875 2013 '~ $6,D00 $150,000 2010 _ - _ - j -~'- ~ - -_ - - -~ - __- ___ --, ____L- _ -- Pavedwalkway ! ~ 1991 625 ~ 15yr r - $ 2,SOD.OOT~, __ -'----*--- -~_ $5,900 I __ _ ~ I _ __ j - ~ _ _ _ -- _ _ I ` _ -- - .. --- ~~ I - -- ---- - - -- i --- ~ ~ - ~ - ---~------- IrrgatonSyslem~ 2001 20N -~ f----- ~ -'I !_~ -_ ~ ~ ~--- -- - ! VolleyballCourts ~ 2000 ~ --1- ~ 20yr - - I ~ - -- ? --- -~ ~ -~--~ -- - ----- ---_--~ ---a --I -_ i~_-- - ---~i ~--- ~ I -~------- ~------ ~--- - ~ ~.-- ~ Youth Services ~ -~., -- - _ --- - ~- - - --! ------r ----- --r ------- ! ~ ~~ - - - -; - -- ~ ~ I ! ~-- j ~-- ~ i --- ~ i ~ ~ ~ i - - fi ~ I ' -- -- ---- --- 1 - ~ TOTAL9 ! $ 17,938,345.001 $ 9,500.001 $ 6,038,760.001 ----- 1 $ 22,535,940.00, - - -~~ -- a ~~ ~~. Capital Assest Value Bridges Year Built Length Width Rating SQ FT Repalcement Bighorn @ Pitkin 1989 23 42.5 90.6 977.5 $488,750 Black Gore Drive 1988 30 24 76.4 720 $360,000 Bridge Road 1979 39 34 86 1326 $663,000 Forest Road 1988 128 35 95.7 4480 $2,240,000 Gore Creek Drive 1990 45 38.75 99.9 1743.75 $871,875 Kinicinick East 1980 61.33 30 89.7 1839.9 $919,950 Kinicinick west 1983 52 32 83 1664 $832,000 Lupine Road 1981 51.5 28 96.7 1442 $721,000 Main Gore Drive 1975 41 30 96 1230 $615,000 Matterhorn 1970- 38.5 24.25 40.2 933.625 $466,813 Meadow Drive 1975 41.2 30 90.9 1236 $618,000 Nugget Lane 1981 41 14.25 69.6 584.25 $292,125 Vail Road 1995 64 43.33 79.7 2773.12 $1,386,560 Vail Valley Drive West 1886 42 45 77.7 1890 $945,000 Vail Valley Drive East 1985 61.5 46.5 97.6 2859.75 $1,429,875 Westhaven 1979 96 28.33 69.4 2719.68 $1,359,840 Willow bridge Road 1992 51 45 96 2295 $1,147,500 $15,357,288 Major Draninage Structures ~ roadways Big Horn Q Columbine $150,000 Bigorn Gm Spruce $150,000 Bighorn ~ Bighorn Rd $150,000 Booth Creek ~ Booth Creek Dr $150,000 Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir $150,000 Mill Creek ~ Mill Creek Cir $150,000 Mill Creek @ Vail Valley Drive , $150,000 Mill Creek ~ Hanson Ranck $150,000 Mill Creek ~ Gore Creek Drive $150,000 Spraddle Creek System $150,000 Middle Creek Frontage $150,000 Middle Creek Frontage $150,000 Middle Creek Meadow Drive $150,000 Red Sandstorn [~ Vail View Drive $150,000 Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage $150,000 Red Sandstorn ~ Frontage $150,000 Buffher Creek @ Circle $150,000 Buffher Creek ~ Chamonix $150,000 Buffher Creek @Frontaage $150,000 Buffher Creek ~ Frontaage $150,000 $3,000,000 Major Draninage Structures @ Trai ls Booth Creeek $65,000 Mill Creek $65,000 Middle Creek $65,000 Middle Creek $65,000 Red Sandstone $65,000 Buffeher Creek $65,000 Buffher Creek $65,000 Deer Underpass $65,000 $520,000 Roadways( 32.4) miles Lineal Feet Percent Lineal Feet rated 90-100 10618 6.3% Lineal Feet rated 80-90 68362 40.8% Lineal Feet rated 70-BO 36998 23.3% Lineal Feet rated 60-70 20263 12.1% Lineal Feet rated 50-60 10318 6.2% Lineal Feet rated 40-50 7497 4.5% Lineal Feetrated 30-40 5351 3.2% Lineal Feet rated 20-30 2856 1.7% Lineal Feet rated 10-20 216 0.1% Lineal Feetrated 0-10 2947 1.8% Lineal Feet rated poor or fair 167426 17.4% Less than 60 E Vail Rds to reconst 23010 13.7% Golf Crse Rds to reconst 10112 6.0% Value of roadway assest 32.4 5280 171072 275 $47,044,800 Recreation Paths -Recreation Path(14.7) mile: 14.7 5280 77616 150 $11,642,400 Recreation Path bridges 18 250000 $4,500,000 Parks . Playgrounds(9) New (6) 6 350000 $2,100,000 Older(3) 3 250000 $750,000 $2,850,000 Picnic shelters 6 $300,000 Public Art 31 Varies $1,310,000 Other Street Lights 1385 2500 $3,462,500 Streetscape 300000 60 $18,000,000 Snowmelt System 350000 35 $12,250,000 $30,250,000 Specieman Trees 100 20000 $2,000,000 Vehicles $17,241,290 Systems Computers $3,500,000 Radio Equipment $2,500,000 Parking Systems $950,000 Electornic Signs $250,000 Furniture and Fixtures $2,500,000 Parkng Lots 500 350 175000 5 $875,000 Building Assets from Building Master Plan $175,000,000 VRD Managed Assets $20,000,000 Toatal Asset Value x345,053,278 GS MASTER TOWN OF VAIL BU - PLAN SUMMARY 2005 - - ~ i __--__ I _ _ ! _.-- ___-_ ' _ ____ _~_ _.. _-_._._. I ----~--- , I - -- I - - ---~- - -- 1 ~ _ Asset i, Date Built ~ SfzeSF Life Cycle Current Value Maintenance ~ Major Upgrade r - -- ----- Yearofremodel ' Remodel cost - Replacement i Yearlnitial _ __ --- ---- Replacementcost ~Yearreplacement _ Replacementcost I i ~ _ - ~ Cost perYear ! Remodel Cost , (3141ite) ~ year o f remodel Today's Cost Replacement due year of replacement ',after remodel (113 more) -year of revised 113 more _ Bus Shelters(15) ~ 1991-1999 -- 100 ea ' ----- -- 30yr - _$247000 i $11,000 _ _ $132000 2014.2022 $342,396 $280,000 ~ _2020 2029_ - $1,045,36_8 12030-2039 - ~ _ _ $1,702_794 CommunityDevelopment r _ ' 1967 - --' - 7,000 ---- 40yr - $1550,0001 - --- - i - - $38000 $930,000 1997 _-_ T- ~ $728679 `$2,750,000 2007 ~ -~ -- - _ - $3,509774 - _ --- 2012; _- _ -- $4,479460 - Donavan Pavilion 2000 ~ 1 T I 4 r 0Y _i _- _ l --- ' I ----- 2040 - - ~ I -- -----.-.- ._ ----- ' -- -------- ---- --- --- -- FireStaOon II (MainVaiq - - - -- 1971 i --- ~--- 7,150 I - 35yr ~ i~- $1600,000 ~ $470,000 $33A00 ~ ; 2001 , $447,619 $1,970,000 2006 j $2,39454 7 20181 $4,300,26 3 FireStationl(E astVail) _ 1960 - ~ _ T 7,500 i! 30yr _ _ -- `$1650000 _ _ $28000_ - $38500D~ ___ ~2003 '' - $404_2_50 __ _ $1370,0 _ 2010 - _ _ _ __ __ - $2,024,1141- - 2020 __ _ $3,297,068 _ Fountains - - - _ ~--- . _ ---- _ - _ - ' - - _-- - --- - - -'- -- --- Children's --- -~ -- - T-- - j-- ----- ---I - ~ I ----- ---- ~ Slifer Wall Street ,--- -- I _ ~ _ --t- I __ -T ~ ~_-~- _ - ~ I i -- ~ I ~ _ -.r -~ _~ ~ ~- - - _ ~- --- - I --- -- Lionshead - j _ I -- ~-- -- T - i --~-- - - I ---'-- --- I ~ --r-------1-- ~~_ -- - ----~----- Mayofs - Gerald Ford Amphitheater ~ -- .1987 8 2001 ---- - 50 yr I __ ' 'i ~ By VVF --- -----i - - ~ ~ ~ - --- - -- - , 2037 -2051 ---- -- ---j----- ', -- --- -------- -- - 0 Housing -- __ _-.. i ~ _ - -_ i -i ~ - i ----~-~ - - - ----~- ; ~= - -- -- - __ - Y _ -_ $0 Buuard Park (24) 1996 I ~ 13,500 ~ 30 yr $2,38fi 000 1 _ $48,000 I- 57,640,000 1 2019 1 817 969_,424 $2 750,000 2026 _ $8,869 025 I - - 2036'' $14446,707 ~ Creeks'~de (ifi) Vail Das Schone (1) - 1_ 'i 5,100 l -- 1,100 20yr 30 yr -~ $980,500 ; $211,500 i $40,000-~$440,0 $7 600 $44,000 ~--~-- I - - --- ~- -' _ -- - ~ _ ~ $0 $0 ~ 750-j - 30 r 250 i J $144 __ 500 $49 $7 5°0 ---- ~ _ I _ --- - '' -- - -$0 Vail Heights (1) '~ ° y , , , --_ _ _ --- Innsbruck(1)- Managers Residence _ ~ i 1979 8 850_ _ 3,100 ~ 30 yr_ 25 yr ~ $162,750_ $612,500 -- $6,7001 565,000 $10,500 $170,000 _~ 1998 ' _ ; $139,859 I _ ~ -_---$550,000 2003 ~ I -- -T-- --- 1 :, _-_- - 2011 j --$0 --- Library -- - 19 17,400 - 1 40yr - __ -$3,820,0001 _ _ _ $60,000 $990,000 __ _ 2011 ~ _ -- - --- --- , ..51535,815 ,_ - - - _$4,900,000] 2023 --_--~ _ _ - - $20,500_000 ---•----- _ - --20351 --- _ ----~- $25,200,000 - --- --- _ LionsheadTrans orla8on p -- -- _1980 - ~ -- _ 50 r - - $42,240,000' ~ $1,650,000 _ $104,000 __ --- r -- _ 0 ---.. $2,437,801 ~, .....-------~ 1 _ I-- $Sfi,50_0,000 ~ 2030 ~ - _ T------ ___$221,487,296 i, _ - --- x---- 1 2 3 ---- $256,399,231 _ _ Aunlia _8wldin Colaado West - 1980 1980 --- 1,3_50 - 40 r - Y__ 30 yr ~ $460,000 _ _ $121,000 , ~- -- _ --- I _ - 2010 _$0 2010 $0 -- -- - - - ~ 2020 ~ - 2010__ i -~ - -~ ? ------ $0 _ _ ___ $0 __ - 2033 _ _ - --- , '-- $0 -- --$0 Information Cen er ----- - Misc.Butldin sand Sheds 9 Moved in 1990 - Varies I - ---- ~ 20 yr ---- $82,000 T - ----- $275,000 , ~- __ -- $30,000 j - $82,000 005 ----- - 1997 $0 , ------ -: $64,249 , r _ 2010 -r- - -r $330,000 $0 ------ ----- $0 2017 ---- - I-------- - $0 $0 -- -- Munidpal Building - - _ 1967 _ _ 11,425 , - --- 1 - _ -_- ` r- 40yr $3,000,000, ---- ---- i ---- ------ ---- $44,000 $1,400,000 ---~ ---- ----- ----- -- 1997 ~---- ---- _. - _...-- - $1,096,937 _ ----- -- 0 --- --- ------ ---~ -r $3,850,000, 2007 - --- - I ----- -- ---- $4,913,684 -------- --- $0 ----- 2020'---------- -----' -- $9,265,484 $D ParkRestrooms(7)-_~ -- -- - _ -_ 1992 a 1_ ry 5 - Y r _ 6 36 D $38000 $82 5 0 - - 2018 ~ - $180; 8 7 - - ---- ! T $6 601) 2027 i 000 -------.- ~ --- $22 349 9437 -- -- _..- 2039 ---- 286 $40 137 Police De artment ~- 1- -. - --- - 5 07 ---y -. ~ , 5 $ ~ - ~ ---- - _ , ---_ ~ .,- $60 000 ' ~-- ---..... - $0 , , ; -- -,------ ~ , . --- $0~ ----- - -- ----- ~ ------ $0 , , - Public Works -------- ---- Admin. Buddm Bus Bam lVJash 9 - -- - ---- -- 1 996 1996 ---~ 33 250 I 1 I - - _ Y ~ 30 yr ---- i I --, ~ _ _ _ _ 1_ ~ $2,272,000 ~ I ---- , __ ___ $82,500 $275,000 ~ - -- -`-- - 2022 2019 ---- ---- - $216,897 $630,305 2031_ _ - _ - $2,470_000 $3,150,000 2026 ~- ( - ___ _ $1D,166,856~ __ 065 _ _ ~ $10 159 I __2043 _--_-- 2036 $16,258,211 - $16 048 548 __ _ Shop- -- _-_- Vail Transporta8on Ctr. --- -- Ski Museum _ i -- _ 1980 1974 & 1990 --~-- 199 --- - _ 24,500 ~ -- 0 ~- - - -----~ 7 0 -- 30yr $3, 5 ,500 50 yr $69,850,000 yr - ~- 605000 ~ $ $365,000 121,200,000 -+------ j 003 2 -- J ~ - 20.10 1 i- --- 635250 $ $179,067,600 ~- ! - ------ - $5,150,000 2010 $77,000,000 ' 2024 -2030 ------~--------=- I ~ _ - - - , , __ $7,608,896 $301,849,944 -------- ------- _ _ _ 2020; ___- 2043 i -----•-p------ 2038, , , $12,394,089 $569,183,087 - Infama8o_n Center _ 1990 - ~ -- i __ ~--- ~ yr _ ----, _ __ mo _ ~ __ _ --- - _ 2116 , _ ~_ - $0 ------ - I-- - -- - } - - --- ----_ ----- I--- 025_ I _~----------- -- _ _ -- 2038--- ----- ___ -- -- Terminal Buildin 9 _ 1995 ~ _ I 35 I 2021 --- -- $o -- - 2030 - i i -- ---I --- -- 2042, __-- - -- - -_ --- -- - -- i Totals ~ $143,080,000 $962,300 $136,969,500 i - $169,840,000 j ~ - - -- - ' -- A~ UAILRECREATIONDISIRICTASSETS1605 ( - - ! I I 1 -- - I _.__--_- -- I --- --- ~~ -~ ~ .- - _ -_- -- - -l --- _ _--_-- -_- `~~ ! _ ----- i I J ---- l- - Asset i DateBuilt j SizeS F LHeCyde _ ; CurrentValue i Maintenance I Major Upgrade Year of remodel Remodel cost 1----' , Replacement Yezrlnitial ! Replacementcost ~ Yearreplacement _ :Replacement cost _ _ ~ ! __ _ Remodel Cost ; (3141'dej year of remodel Today's Cost 'Replacement due ! ! Cost per Year year of replacement ; after remodel (113 morej_ _ !year of revised 113 more _ -- r-- ! ~- , ( T - ---- - ~ -~-- ( ~ ~ , -- --- --- - ~-- - --- i - ~ - --~--- -~- -- -~-- - ~ ---, - - -- ~ I 1 I _ _ j _ I - -- Fard Park ii - - i - ~-J-- --- ~ --T-~ -- ~ -T I ~ _ ~ ResVOemslConcessions 1983 1,000 25yr I $ 250,000.00 $75,000 j 2002 , $150,000 ; $r300,000.001 2008 $347,287 Irngation System 1990 J 20 W ! ~ ~ ~ ! ~ j - I Fencing ! 1992 ' 2,697 I 15yr i 5 26,970.00; _ __ $13,485 I 2003 $14,868 - -_ I $ 53,940.00! 2007 I $59,469 ~ - _ I _ Storage Facility 1990 60D i 25 yr . S 3 0 I ----~ - j --_ -~ I ~ $ 105,000.00 r ~ '~ - _- -_ - _- -- Bleachers 1992 I - - - I i ------- ~ - ~--r----- -~ --- ~ _ ~ _ -- I - - ~ - ~ - ~ - --- -. ~ -- ._._ -_ Club House 1975-1987 ; ~ 6,D00- - 'I--30yr =_S 1,700,000 .00._ 52,000 _~ 1987 I - _ .._- -'---- -- $ 0 00.001- 2005 ---- $7,000,000 _ ---- ----- `~- -- $D CadBam i 1987 ~ 7,200 - - -i -30yr _ i $ _ 720,D0000j ~ -- _ j $185,000 newroof i 2009 I 5224_86_8_ _ ~ $ 1,260,000.00-- 2017 ___ __ ___ T __ Maintenance Shop 1975-1998 I 8,000 j 30yr i$ 1,200,000ODI i ~ ! I$ 2,000,000.001 20D6 I $0 -- StartersShack #6 198_7_ 9 1,600 ! 30yr ; $_ --~- 28D,000.001 --~ 5 ---T--- 7---- I -- ~ ---!---- -- I $ 480,OD000 _ I 000 001 ~ $ 347 -~ - ---- -__ _ - -- _~ _ Course_Restroom Course Restroom #12 ---- Retainin Wall #3 1 91 ! 1981 r~ _ 1994 1,155 25 200 - --- 25 r Y 1 112 20 ~ , $ - I ~ 202,12 .OD ~ i ---- -- r- ----- I _ __ 240A00 OD -- - - ~ , , . -- $ __ 60,000.00-- ~ 55 O I -- __- -~ --- -- -- - I _ - - -9 -- - - -- - , - -~__-- _. i- ------ - _ ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ _ _ ~ ~-- -Refainmg Wall#7 _ --- - RetainingWall#15 - -- ~-- Bridge#1 1994 _y 920 I 2061 ~ 1750 7992 ~ 14'x13' , 20yr -- _-I 20yr_ -.--.- I _ _ t- $ - _ _ - -_ ~ -~-- 001 100 000 - - --- - ~ I _ - ------- ~ -- - _ - ~ $ 75,000.00 I-- --~ -- -- I -- --- ------- _,_-__ -- ~ _-~ ___ - I'._ - --Bridge #2 _ - 1992 I 12x13 - , '- - ~5 , . 9000000 I _ _ _ _ _ ~ - __ _ r i -- ~ _ -_ - Bndge #1l small -- 1992 20 z8 _ _ ~ $ 100 000 00 1 _ _-~-- ~ _ -__ I ~ - - -- _ i I ' _ - - . ,, __ -L, -- i ~ - _-_~ -_._- _ - - _- _Bridge#11_waWctng Bridge#14 ---- 1989 i 1975 i - -- 40 z16 45x11 ~- _ _ : $I $ i $ 2 0 20D,000.00 _ -- ~ I -_ - - -- 1- I ~ -- j I ! -~- ~ _ ~ --- 1 -{ _ _ _-_ - _- - ---____ _.. _ __~ _- _ _.`-._- ---- - Bndge#15 y _1975 45x11 ~- --- S - ZOD,000.0g ~ j T _ -----1---. ~ ' _ _L _ 1-- ~-1 --_- - --- ----- _-~ ___~_,- Bridge #17 - 1968_ ~-- 40' x 10' --- ', -- - I S 200,000.00' 1-- - T ---~---~ -- -'- -----'--_ ~~-._-' --- - -- -_ ------ __ _ - ~ -- --LightningSheker#1 LightingShelter#5 1970 _ _ 1 1970 r - 625 '~___ 20yr _ _ 625 - I 20yr I $ _ ' $ _ 5,000.00__ __ 3,000.001, l __ l -___ ---1------ j I ------ __ I , -tl----- - ----- --- _,_-.-_ ----- __--___ ---------- -,-,_J_,__ --~----- - CartPaths ---- Irrigation System _ -1-- 1998-2000,25,2 --- - 1970-1908 - 841inear ---- -~1--- it.~ 10yr --1-. I 20 yr ~-- $ . _ ~ _ - - 250,D00.00 _ _ -- -~ - ~ -,----.--_ ~ I - ~ , --- ~ -__ .___ _ Drivin Ran a - 9-- 9 __ __._ _ 1994 -- __ __ - I y _ 20 rr ._ - I ~_-_ _ _ _ _ , ~ _ - 1 -_-- --- __._ ~ __ - __ --_-_-_- _ --- _ -- --~ TI ( j _ ~_ 1 ~ Dobson Ice Arena -- ----- i - -- _ l -- ~ ~ - ----- I _ ~ - ` . i __I ~ --~------- I 1 ---' ~ - -- - '~ - ---.~---- Building-- i -- - 1979-2001 - 35,000 50yr - $ -I- 8,750,000.00! ----- $4,375,000 j 2017 ---' _ _ -- $ 10,SOO,OOD.OOC _2029 - 539,201,291 ~ -------- ~ _ ---- Refrigeration System 1979-2000 _ 16,000 -- I ~ _ -_ _~_. __ _~_ _ - - I __-~_ _-i __-_-. _- _-~____ G mnasticsCentei y --- ~ , 2004 r- i - ---~II . _ -- 9,000 -I - 40yr $ -- = ~ i --- i 1,700,000.00 - ~ - I T - ~- 2034 -- , $850,000 -'_ I ~~___- _ j ~ - --~---'~ _--_ ~ I - --.__ - -_-__ 1-_ - _ _ - 0 Nature Center _I ----- --1-~ 1975 ~-- -_ 1,400 -- 1- 20yr - !$ 245,000.001__ ~^--------- __ ~ __$122,500 ~--_ S 3DO,000.OOI --~ -~----~-- -- - -- r ____ ~. - TennisCeMer --'- - ~ - , ~ ~ ~ I -- I ~ ~ -~ T I I ~-- - SO - Building -- ~ _ 1991 _ 3,250 _ 30yr -t' , _ $893,750 _ _-_ $1,500 ~ 5446,875 I 2013 I - - j-- i_ - _ __ -_ _ Tennis Courts _ ~ 1995 l I 53,gti2 - ~_20yr - __ T$ 300,000.OD - _ _ $6,000 `5150,0002010 j_ -- _ ~ __ __~ _- _ ~ ___ Paved walkway _ ----- - 1991 , 625 -j__15yr I S 2,500.001 -- - j $5,900 j ~--- -- ---}----{--- ~ -- - ___- ~ I l ~ I ~ - --- ( - --~-- AtlrleticFeld ~ I- --- -~ ~-- -~- --~-~ - _ -~- I -- J T - - 1 -- ~-- -- ImigationSystem 2001 ,~ - I 20 yr I - ~ - .-_ -- ' - ! ------ ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ --- VolleyballCourts ~ 2000 ( - - - ~- ZO yryr ~ -~- -_- - -- { ~--_----' __ - _ ~ ~`- -~ ~ I ~_ ~ Yount Services ~ __ 1.- -~; ___ i -__._._.__ ~ I - ( ~ -_ f ^ I ~ I __ ___ ~ ~ -~ I -_ ~ II L T 1 - - ~ - i -~- -I --~-- - I ~-~- ~ I ~-- _-~ ^ -- ~- -~ - _ ! j TOTALS I $ 17,938,345.DOj S --- 9,500.001$ 6,038,760.001 I $ 22.535,940.00 ~ ' I U Capital Street Maintenance Budget Budget Prioritization Summary September 6`h, 2005 Background: In order to preserve the structural integrity of the Town of Vail's 32.4 miles of streets and maintain them to a high standard, the Public Works Department uses updated visual pavement inspection reports, street maintenance history, traffic loads, street classification, and a database software program called Pavement View Plus. The Town's streets are rated using the USACE Pavement Maintenance Management Program, detailed in Technical Manual TM 5-623. The inspection ratings are based on a scale from 0 to .100, where 100 is Excellent, and less than 40 is poor. It is our goal to maintain all Town streets at a level greater than 70. Once a road approaches 40 it is considered for reconstruction. Currently approximately 70% of our roads are rated above 70, 19% between 50 and 70, and 11 % below 50. Capital street dollars are budgeted based upon current conditions of the streets, historical maintenance, and with the objective in mind to preserve streets that have been reconstructed and/or have had significant capital investment. The Town currently has an asphalt street replacement value of approximately $47 million dollars of which $38 million is of already reconstructed streets (Does not include Streetscape/Villages). Required Maintenance: In order to preserve the Town's streets and our capital investment the Town has entered into a street maintenance program that includes a variety of rehabilitation techniques, including: crack sealing, shouldering, surface seals, asphalt patching, concrete repair, full depth pavement patching, asphalt mill and overlays, drainage improvements, and reconstruction; and many regulatory requirements including: a 5-year street cut moritorium on all newly paved roads, flow fill requirements for narrow utility trenches, infrared seamless asphalt patchback requirements, utility stubouts to empty lots during road reconstruction, and 2 year construction warranties. As streets are reconstructed they are entered into this maintenance program in order to extend the pavements life to an excess of 50 years. The program requires these streets be continuously monitored and maintained. With 32.4 miles of streets within the Town this requires a rotating schedule of street maintenance in order to spread out the costs to become manageable. Based on this maintenance program a long term Capital Streets Maintenance Budget has been prepared, that includes the above mentioned major and minor maintenance programs for those streets already reconstructed as well as "bandaids" for those streets that still need to be reconstructed at a future date. Future Needs: As those streets that have not yet been reconstructed continue to deteriorate and are repaired with `bandaids', the `bandaid' repairs will continue to be less effective and become more costly. Therefore the continuation of Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Projects is imperative. These projects were originally post-poned unti12009 due to budget re-prioritization (Streetscape). It is the Public Works Department desire to continue on with these projects starting in 2009 and continuing thru 2011 or 2012. However if other needs supercede in priority those streets could be held off for another 10 years with a timely asphalt overlay and then surface treatments until 2016, at which time the Town should commit to reconstruction. Currently there are approximately 5-6 miles of roadway that have not yet been reconstructed within the Town, most noteably, Mill Creek Circle, Willow Rd., Willow Ct., Vail Valley Drive, and the majority of the East Vail Roads. This can be expected to cost approximately $9-$1 l million dollars. ~~ Future Wishlist: In order to more effectively convey traffic throughout the valley the following improvements are desired by the Public Works Department: 1. Implementation of the Frontage Rd Masterplan, including medians, accel/decal lanes and turn lanes. 2. Simba Run underpass 3. Additional strategically placed roundabouts. 4. Gold Peak one way route bridge to Ford Park lot 5. Additional Parking structure (Ford Park/Holy Cross Lot) 6. Separated recreation paths (East Vail) 7. Complete the Frontage Rd. bikepath Main Vail to West Vail both sides of Interstate 8. Develop comprehensive integrated travel demand management system which emphasizes use of transit/pedestrian modes and de-emphasizes use of the automobile. a. Paid parking year round day and night. b. Enhanced Transit Centers c. Require bike racks at new developments d. Require developer to integrate employee van pool system to discourage traffic. e. Work with van companies to~provide a more economic solution to renting a car for families. 9. Move/Mitigate I-70 (Noise mitigation/Cut&cover/Tunnel) 10. Regional system of transit between summit stage, RFTA, ECO. ~C' b 2006 Capital Improvments Budget 2006 Budget: $ 932,000.00 2006 Drainage: $ 75,000.00 Total Budget: $ 1,007,000.00 Ca itallm rovement Estimated Cost Drainage Improvements (North West Vail) $ 375,000.00 1.5" Mill & Overlay (North West Vail) $ 300,000.00 Crack Seal $ 5,000.00 Stripping $ 20,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00 Concrete repair $ 42,400.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Red Sandstone Drainage Improvement $ 75,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 15,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 8,000.00 Bridge Improvement $ 15,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 91,540.00 $ 1,006,940.00 Drainage Improvements Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Storm Sewer 3000 LF $ 50.00 $ 150,000.00 Inlets 10 EA $ 3,125.00 $ .31,250.00 Manholes 5 EA $ 3,750.00 $ 18,750.00 Concrete Curb/Gutter/Pan 4000 LF $ 43.75 $ 175,000.00 $ 375,000.00 1.5" Mill 8 Overlay Mill 14200 SY $ 6.88 $ 97,625.00 Asphalt 2300 Ton $ .87.50 $ 201,250.00 $ 298,875.00 ~. 2007 Capital Improvments Budget 2007 Budget: $ 1,032,000.00 2007 Drainage: S 75,000.00 Sub Total: $ 1,107,000.00 Rolled to 2005 $ (365,000.00) Total Budget: $ 742,000.00 Ca ital Im rovement Estimated Cost 1.5" Overlay $ 105,000.00 Slurry Seal $ 185,000.00 Crack Seal $ 85,000.00 Stripping $ 21,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00 Concrete repair $ 50,000.00 Guardrail $ 35,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 75,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 8,300.00 Pavement Inspection $ 15,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 67,430.00 $ 741,730.00 7.5" Aspahtt Overlay Quantity Unit Asphalt (East Vail Rds., Mill Creek Circle, Willow Rds.) 1150 Ton Slurry Seal Golf Course Rds., Vail Valley Drive, Spruce Way, Bighorn Rd, Elkhorn 60000 SY Forest Rd., E. Meadow, Vail Rd., Glen Lyon Rds. Unit Cost Totai Cost $ 89.60 $ 103,040.00 $ 2.88 $ 172,800.00 ~6 2008 Capital Improvments Budget 2008 Budget: $ 950,000.00 2008 Drainage: $ 75,000.00 Total Budget: $ 1,025,000.00 Ca itallm rovement Estimated Cost Rockledge/Beaver Dam Drainage Improvements $ 375,000.00 Rockledge/Beaver Dam Rd. Overlay/Water Line Improvements $ 175,000.00 West Vail Roundabout Curb/Gutter $ 200,000.00 Stripping $ 22,000.00 Crack Seal $ 5,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00 Concrete repair $ 40,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 15,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 8,600.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 93,060.00 $ 1,023,660.00 Drainage Improvements Storm Sewer Box Culvert Inlets Manholes Concrete Curb/Gutter/Pan Quantity Unit 3000 LF 1 EA 10 EA 5 EA 3000 LF 7.5" Mill 8~ Overlay Mill Asphalt 7000 SY 1000 Ton Unit Cost Total Cost $ 52.40 $ 157,200.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 3,275.00 $ 32,750.00 $ 3,930.00 $ 19,650.00 $ 45.85 $ 137, 550.00 $ 367,150.00 $ 7.21 $ 50,435.00 $ 91.70 $ 91,700.00 $ 142,135.00 ~b 2009 Capital Improvments Budget 2009 Budget: 2009 Drainage: Total Budget: $ 980,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 1,055,000.00 1.5" Mill and Overlay $ 555,000.00 ,Stripping $ 23,000.00 iAsphalt Patching $ 35,000.00 Concrete repair $ 35,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Crack Seal $ 5,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 55,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 15,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 8,900.00 Pavement Inspection $ 16,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 95,790.00 $ 1,053,690.00 1.5" Aspahlt Overlay Quantity Mill Asphalt (Sandstone District, Spraddle Creek Rd.) Slurry Seal North West Vail Rds., Lupine Dr, Bridge Rd., Buffehr Creek Rds.) 2009 Capital Projects-Budget Neighborhood Street Project Vail Valley Drive Unit Unit Cost. Total Cost 24000 SY $ 7.37 $ 176,880.00 4000 Ton $ 93.80 $ 375,200.00 $ 552,080.00 66000 SY $ 3.02 $ 198,990.00 $ 1,500,000.00 4400 LF $ 335.50 $ 1,476,200.00 Bridge Replacement $ 1,000,000.00 Matterhorn Bridge $ 1,000,000.00 2010 Capital Improvments Budget 2010 Budget: 2010 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Ca itallm rovement Estimated Cost 1.5" Mill and Overlay (Intermtn District) $ 145,000,.00 1.5" Mill and Overlay (Booth Falls District) $ 320,000.00 2"Mill and Overlay (WD, Vail Rd. (s), E. LH Circle) $ 275,000.00 Stripping $ 24,000.00 Crack Seal ~ $ .7,500.00 Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00 Concrete repair $ 50,000.00 Guardrail $ 35,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 85,000.00 Storm Water Management $ ,30,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 9,400.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 106,090.00 $ 1,166, 990.00 1.5" Mill & Asphalt Overlay Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Intermountain District Mill 6000 SY $ 7.54 $ 45,210.00 Asphalt 1000 Ton $ 95.90 $ 95,900.00 $ 141,110.00 Booth Falls District Mill 13000 SY $ 7.54 $ 97,955.00 Asphalt 2200 Ton $ 95.90 $ 210,980.00 $ 308,935.00 2" Mill & Asphalt Overlay Vail Valley Drive, Vail Rd. (s), E. LH Circle, W LH Circle Mill 14000 SY $ 7.54 $ 105,490.00 Asphalt 1700 Ton $ 95.90 $ 163,030.00 $ 268,520.00 2010 Capital Projects Budget Neighborhood Street Project $ 4,100,000.00 Columbine Drive 11800 LF $ 343.75 $ 4,056,250.00 Spruce Way Spruce Dr. Streamside Circle West Streamside Circle East Nugget Lane . Glen Lyon Mill Creek Circle Willow Rd Willow Ct Bridge Replacement $ 1,000,000.00 Nugget Lane Bridge $ 1,000,000.00 ~6 2011 Capital Improvments Budget 2011 Budget: 2011 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Ca ital Im rovement Estimated Cost Slurry $ 125,000.00 1.5" Mill and Overlay (Matterhorn) $ 330,000.00 Stripping $ 25,000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Asphalt Patching $ 75,000.00 Concrete repair $ 60,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 85,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 9,800.00 Pavement Inspection $ 17,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 77,430.00 $ 851,730.00 1.5" Aspahlt Overlay Quantity Unit Mill 13000 SY Asphalt (Matterhorn) 2300 Ton Slurry Seal (Beaver Dam Rd, Kinnick, Bellflower,Rockledge, Forest) 35000 SY 2011 Capital Projects Budget Neighborhood Street Project Meadow Dr. 12500 LF Meadow Ln Juniper Main Gore Drive (N&S) ~ Main Gore Circle Ute Ln Black Bear Black Gore Snowshoe Grouse Length 10100 Unit Cost Total Cost $ 7.70 $ 100,100.00 $ 98.00 $ 225,400.00 $ 325,500.00 $ 3.15 $ 110,250.00 $ 4,400,000.00 $ 352.00 $ 4,400,000.00 ~b 2092 Capital Improvments Budget 2012 Budget: 2012 Drainage: _ Total Budget: $ Estimated Cost Ca itallm rovement Slurry (East Vail, Mill Crk, Willow Rds, Sandstone) $ 300,000.00 Stripping $ 26,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00 Concrete repair $ 60,000.00 Crack Seal $ 95,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 400,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 GPS Data Collection. $ 10,200.00 Contingency (10%) $ 101,120.00 $ 1,112, 320.00 ~b 2013 Capital Improvments Budget 2013 Budget: 2013 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Estimated Cost :apital Improvement ilurrv (Intermtn. Booth Falls. Forest, WD, E. LD Cr, Bighorn, Vail Rd) $ 325,000.00 1.5"-Mill Overlay (Golf Course) $ 350,000.00 Stripping $ 27,000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Asphalt Patching $ 75,000.00 Concrete repair $ 60,000.00 Guardrail $ 35,000.00 Pavement Inspection $ 18,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 10,600.00 Contingency (10%) $ 103,310.00 $ 1,136,410.00 ~b 2014 Capital Improvments Budget 2014 Budget: 2014 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Estimated Cost Ca ital Im rovement Slurry (Matterhorn, East Vail 1&2, Bighorn) $ 550,000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Stripping $ 28,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 50,000.00 Concrete repair $ 60,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 11,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 87,150.00 958, 650.00 ~Gb 2015 Capital Improvments Budget 2015 Budget: 2015 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Ca ital Im rovement Estimated Cost Slurry (Cascade) $ 75,000.00 Stripping $ 29,000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Asphalt Patching $ 75,000.00 Concrete repair $ 60,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00 Pavement Inspection $ 19,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 GPSDataCollection $ 11,400.00 Contingency (10%) $ 41,190.00 $ 453,090.00 2015 Capital Projects Budget Bridge Replacement $ 1,300,000.00 Bridge Rd. Bridge $ 1,300,000.00 ~b 2016 Capital Improvments Budget 2016 Budget: 2016 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Estimated Cost Ca itallm rovement Slurrv (Beaver Dam Forest Rd__ Rockledge. Golf Course. NW Vail $ 275.000.00 1.5" Mill & Overlay (Lupine, Bridge, Willow, Lionsridge $ 610,000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Stripping $ 30,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00 Concrete repair $ 70,000.00 Guardrail $ 35,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 11,800.00 Contingency (10%) $ 112,250.00 1, 371, 550.00 ~~ 2017 Capital Improvments Budget 2017 Budget: 2017 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Estimated Cost Ca itallm rovement Slurry (Sandstone $ 100.000.00 1.5" Mill & Overlay (Kinnick, Belllflower $ 125,000.00 Crack Seal $ 105,000.00 Stripping $ 31,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 85,000.00 Concrete repair $ 70,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 Pavement Inspection $ 20,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 12,200.00 Contingency (10%) $ 55,600.00 $ 738,800.00 ~~ 2018 Capital Improvments Budget 2018 Budget: 2018 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Estimated Cost Ca itallm rovement Slurry (Intrmtn, WD $ 100,000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Stripping $ 32,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00 Concrete repair $ 70,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 12,600.00 Contingency (10%) $ 31,450.00 $ 513,550.00 ~b 2019 Capital Improvments Budget 2019 Budget: 2019 Drainage: Total Budget: ~ $ - Estimated Cost Capital Improvement Slurry (Booth Falls, LionsRidge $ 200,000.00 1.5" Mill & Overlay (Bighorn Rd.) $ 800;000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Stripping $ 33,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 85,000.00 Concrete repair $ 70,000.00 Guardrail $ 35,000.00 Storm Water Management $ ~ 30,000.00 Pavement Inspection $ 21,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 95,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 13,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 126,050.00 $ 1,515,550.00 ~b 2020Capital lmprovments Budget 2020 Budget: 2020 Drainage: Total Budget: $ Estimated Cost Ca itallm rovement 4hirrv (Fact Vail 1 I unine 6ridae Rd.l $ 200,000.00 Crack Seal Stripping Asphalt Patching Concrete repair Guardrail Storm Water Management Drainage Improvement Bridge Improvement GPS Data Collection Contingency (10%) $ 7,500.00 $ 34,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 13,600.00 $ 57,010.00 $ 627,110.00 ~~ 2021 Capital Improvments Budget 2021 Budget: 2021 Drainage: Total Budget: $ Estimated Cost Ca itallm rovement Slurrv (East Vail 2. Matterhorn) ~ 315.000.00 Crack Seal $ 7,500.00 Stripping $ 35,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 85,000.00 Concrete repair $ 80,000.00 Guardrail $ 10,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 Pavement Inspection $ 21,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 110,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 14,200.00 Contingency (10%) $ 70,770.00 $ 778,470.00 ~~ 2022Capital lmprovments Budget 2022 Budget: 2022 Drainage: Total Budget: $ - Estimated Cost Ca itallm rovement Slurry (Golf Course) $ 150,000.00 1.5" Asphalt Overlay (Glen Lyon) $ 300,000.00 Crack Seal $ 120,000.00 Stripping $ 36,000.00 Asphalt Patching $ 65,000.00 Concrete repair $ 80,000.00 Guardrail $ ~ 35,000.00 Storm Water Management $ 30,000.00 Drainage Improvement $ 110,000.00 Bridge Improvement $ 30,000.00 GPS Data Collection $ 15,000.00 Contingency (10%) $ 97,100.00 $ 1, 068,100.00 ~ Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI 1~,;; Sort Cu rent fr~~ettcn ti.)?G.•eai' Ccrc!c-::r: t;xte:< t)r.;ceneir: . Vail Pavement Yinpsections-®CY ID ° . '•Descr`iption _m .. .... From~,.• '~•;., _.... To '. ~ _ ,. , ., tengtH ; . Zone. r- OCI - .~ ... 5990.00 Elkhorn FRONTAGE RD ADMIN . 845.00 ft Main Vail 100.00 8208.00 Bridge Rd ~ LUPINE DR CDS 173.00 ft East Vail 98.36 2200.00 Alta Dr. GORE CREEK DR -CDS 120.00 ft West Vail 97.00 2270.00 Westhaven Dr S. FRONTAGE RD STR 1,340.00 ft Cascade 97.00 8162.00 Spruce Way SPRUCE DR COLUMBINE DR 1,060.00 ft East Vail 95.00 8220.00 Bighorn Rd STR-BIGHORN CRK MAIN GORE DR N 5,700.00 ft East Vail 94.75 8175.00 Spruce Ct RED SANDSTONE RD CDS 64.00 ft East Vail 92.20 1010.00 Bellflower Dr KINNICKINNICK RD TOV LIMITS 800.00 ft Intermountain 90.53 3100.00 Red Sandstone Ct RED SANDSTONE DR CDS 283.00 ft Sandstone 90.14 2160.00 Matterhorn Cir S. FRONTAGE RD W GORE CRK DR 233.00 ft West Vail 90.00 3020.00 Forest Rd VAIL RD BEAVER DAM RD 3,105.00 ft Main Vail 89.96 8210.00 Bighorn Rd FRONTAGE RD END EB BRIDGE RD 861.00 ft East Vail 89.82 2140.00 Gore Creek Dr West S. FRONTAGE RD MATTERHORN CIR.(N) 2,494.00 ft West Vail 89.15 5000.00 Cabin Cir CDS HORNSILVER CIR 227.00 ft Main Vail 89.08 2170.00 Matterhorn Cir GENEVA DR MATTERHORN CT 1,195.00 ft West Vail 88.31 2040.00 Buffehr Creek Rd LIONS RIDGE LOOP CDS 6,008.00 ft North West Vail 88.27 2115.00 Arosa Dr. DAVOS TRAIL CHAMONIX LN 675.00 ft North West Vail 86.96 8155.00 Columbine Dr BIGHORN RD STR 1,250.00 ft East Vail 86.90 5010.00 Hornsilver Cir VAIL VALLEY DR CABIN CIR 273.00 ft Main Vail 86.80 2145.00 Shasta PI W GORE CRK DR CDS 263.00 ft West Vail 86.29 5020.00 Vail Valley Dr GOLD PEAK/MANOR VAIL PTARMIGAN RD EAST 4,048.00 ft Main Vail 85.83 2130.00 Cortina Ln DAVOS TRAIL CDS 1,750.00 ft North West Vail 85.70 1030.00 Snowberry Dr BASINGDALE BLVD CDS 1,740.00 ft Intermountain 85.55 5030.00 Homestake Cir VAIL VALLEY DR CDS 406.00 ft Main Vail 85.34 8192.00 Lupine Dr STR BRIDGE RD 1,760.00 ft East Vail 85.32 4060.00 Lionshead Cir West S.FRONTAGE RD.(WB) S. FRONTAGE RD 1,269.00 ft Main Vail 84.82 7030.00 Booth Creek Dr ASPEN LN CDS(WB) - 200.00 ft . Booth Creek Falls 84.80 8200.00 Bridge Rd BIGHORN RD STR 253.00 ft East Vail 84.60 8230.00 Bighorn Rd BRIDGE RD STR-BIGHORN CRK 3,255.00 ft East Vail 84.51 6035.00 Sunburst Dr GOLF CRSE CLUBHSE CDS 2,395.00 ft Main Vail 84.40 2020.00 Meadow Ridge Rd BUFFEHR CREEK RD WIDCH 660.00 ft North West Vail 84.00 Thursday , September O1, 2005 1 of 5 .57 Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI ID Description From . , ,~_ To 4101.00 Bridge St COVERED BRIDGE HANSON RANCH RD 1040.00 Larkspur Ln KINNICKINNICK RD CDS 2165.00 Matterhorn Cir W GORE CRK DR GENEVA DR 7020.00 Booth Creek Dr CDS (EB) ASPEN LN 2000.00 Lions Ridge Loop VAIL VIEW DRIVE BUFFEHR CREEK RD 5050.00 Eagles Nest Cir VAIL VALLEY DR CDS 5045.00 Fairway Dr PTARMIGAN RD CDS 4140.00 Willow Bridge Rd GORE CREEK DR E. MEADOW DR 7070.00 Katsos Ranch Rd FRONTAGE RD CDS 2070.00 Chamonix Ln BUFFEHR CREEK RD CHAMONIX RD 2150.00 Geneva Dr MATTERHORN CIR.(N) CDS 3090.00 Vail View Dr SANDSTONE DR RED SANDSTONE DR 1000.00 Kinnickinnick Rd S. FRONTAGE RD W BASINGDALE BLVD 3000.00 Beaver Dam Rd. VAIL RD FOREST RD 4075.00 Vail Rd FOREST RD STR 1005.00 Kinnickinnick Rd BASINGDALE BLVD S. FRONTAGE RD W 2190.00 Alpine Drive W. GORE CREEK DR. SIERRA TR 2030.00 Buffehr Creek Rd N. FRONTAGE RD LIONS RIDGE LOOP 3130.00 Potato Patch Dr RED SANDSTONE RD CDS 4065.00 Spraddle Creek Rd N. FRONTAGE RD GATE 1990.00 Glacier Ct LIONS RIDGE LOOP CDS 5046.00 Fairway Ct FAIRWAY DR CDS 3080.00 Sandstone Dr CDS WIDCH • 5015.00 Hornsilver Cir CABIN CIR CDS 3085.00 Sandstone Dr WIDCH VAIL VIEW DR 2010.00 Circle Dr CHAMONIX LN BUFFEHR CREEK RD 8190.00 Lupine Dr BIGHORN RD STR 8180.00 Willow way CDS LUPINE DR 3070.00 Vail View Dr LIONS RIDGE LOOP SANDSTONE DR 5040.00 Ptarmigan Rd VAIL VALLEY DR(EB) VAIL VALLEY DR 1020.00 Basingdale Blvd KINNICKINNICK RD SNOWBERRY DR 3060.00 Lions Ridge Loop N. FRONTAGE RD VAIL VIEW DR 8145.00 Glen Falls Ln NUGGET LANE CDS 8196.00 Lupine Dr BRIDGE RD CDS 8204.00 Bridge Rd STR LUPINE DR 1050.00 Larkspur Ct LARKSPUR LN CDS 2080.00. Chamonix Ln CHAMONIX RD N. FRONTAGE RD Thursday, September O1, 2005 •Length Zone . - OCI 530.00 ft Main Vail 83.94 896.00 ft Intermountain 83.92 186.00 ft West Vail 83.84 1,142.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 83.58 5,272.00 ft North West Vail 83.03 185.00 ft Main Vail 82.80 619.00 ft Main Vail 82.80 422.00 ft Main Vail 82.78 1,473.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 82.40 2,750.00 ft North West Vail 82.35 898.00 ft West Vail 81.77 430.00 ft Sandstone 81.64 1,240.00 ft Intermountain 81.08 2,778.00 ft Main Vail 81.02 591.00 ft Main Vail ~ 80.91 1,053.00 ft Intermountain 80.76 1,536.00 ft West Vail 80.55 1,197.00 ft North West Vail 80.51 7,280.00 ft Sandstone 80.51 3,797.00 ft Main Vail 80.49 327.00 ft North West Vail 79.76 166.00 ft Main Vail 79.60 1,383.00 ft Sandstone 79.49 255.00 ft Main Vail 79.39 950.00 ft Sandstone 79.31 456.00 ft North. West Vail 79.26 390.00 ft East Vail 79.04 308.00 ft East Vail 79.03 1,616.00 ft Sandstone 78.94 1,771.00 ft Main Vail 78.93 1,197.00 ft Intermountain 78.80 743.00 ft Sandstone 78.77 578.00 ft East Vail 77.90 480.00 ft East Vail 77.82 200.00 ft East Vail 77.41 136.00 ft Intermountain 77.20 2,349.00 ft North West Vail 76.64 2 of 5 Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI -~ ID.~:. ' : • .Description: From .. To ~. Length .... ,. ' 2one° ~ .0`CI! -'` .. ~, ; 2185.00 Matterhorn Ct MATTERHORN CIR CDS 370.00 ft West Vail 76.42 2090.00 Chamonix Rd N. FRONTAGE RD CHAMONIX LN 780.00 ft North West Vail 76.29 2155.00 Lucerne Dr MATTERHORN CIR (N) CDS 380.00 ft West Vail 76.24 4090.00 Willow Place WILLOW RD (WB) WILLOW RD 478.00 ft Main Vail 75.69 3120.00 Red Sandstone Rd N. FRONTAGE RD VAIL VIEW DR. 1,634.00 ft Sandstone 75:66 8158.00 Columbine Dr STR CDS 653.00 ft East Vail 75.40 4115.00 Hanson Ranch Rd B BRIDGE ST. HANSON R. RD.-CHUTE 230.00 ft Main Vail 75.17 4034.00 Meadow Dr East VILLAGE CTR RD GATE 500.00 ft Main Vail 75.04 8170.00 Spruce Dr BIGHORN RD SPRUCE WAY 185.00 ft East Vail 75.04 8030.00 Black Bear Ln CDS BLACK GORE DR 516.00 ft East Vail 74.78 2180.00 Matterhorn Cir MATTERHORN CT GENEVA DR 1,793.00 ft West Vail 73.95 7040.00 .Booth Falls Ct BOOTH FALLS RD CDS 658.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 73.90 6030.00 Sunburst Dr VAIL VALLEY DR(N) GOLF CRSE CLUBHSE 1,195.00 ft Main Vail 73.84 6900.00 Manns Ranch Rd FRONTAGE RD CDS 910.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 73.83 8110.00 Meadow Dr STREAMSIDE CIR E JUNIPER LANE 2,550.00 ft East Vail 73.18 6010.00 Vail Valley Dr SUNBURST DR S. FRONTAGE RD 1,130.00 ft Main Vail 72.61 4100.00 Gore Creek Dr VAIL RD VAIL VALLEY DR 1,790.00 ft Main Vail 72.15 2230.00 Sierra Trail ALPINE DR CDS 631.00 ft West Vail 71.79 7000.00 Aspen Ln S. FRONTAGE RD BOOTH CREEK DR 822.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 71.56 8065.00 Main Gore Dr STR BIGHORN RD 1,045.00 ft East Vail 71.47 7015.00 Bald Mountain Rd MANNS RANCH RD CDS 3,200.00 ft Booth. Creek Falls 71.42 3105.00 Sandy In POTATO PATCH DR CDS 385.00 ft Sandstone 71.41 8120.00 Streamside Cir East BIGHORN RD (WB) BIGHORN RD 1,599.00 ft East Vail 71.24 2100.00 Garmish Dr AROSA DR CDS 1,738.00 ft North West Vail 71.16 8060.00 Main Gore Dr MEADOW DR STR 521.00 ft East Vail 70.28 2300.00 Greenhill Ct WESTHAVEN DR CDS 1,457.00 ft Cascade 69.70 3010.00 Beaver Dam Circle BEAVER DAM RD CDS 771.00 ft Main Vail 68.53 4108.00 Hansen Ranch Chute HANSON R. RD.-A GORE CREEK DR 80.00 ft Main Vail 67.68 2125.00 Davos Trail CORTINA LANE CDS 1,275.00 ft North West Vail 67.19 8070.00 Gore Cir MAIN GORE DR N MAIN GORE DR N 1,622.00 ft East Veil 66.80 4070.00 Vail Rd 5. FRONTAGE RD STR 930.00 ft Main Vail ~ 66.21 7060.00 Booth Falls Rd FRONTAGE RD BOOTH FALLS CT 975.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 65.75 3030.00 Rockledge Rd CDS FOREST RD 1,098.00 ft Main Vail 65.63 4032.00 Meadow Dr East SLIFER PLAZA VILLAGE CENTER RD 490.00 ft Main Vail 65.45 2025.00 Meadow Ridge Rd WIDCH END 313.00 ft. North West Vail 65.40 1025.00 Basingdale Blvd SNOWBERRY DR TOV LIMITS 586.00 ft Intermountain 65.40 8010.00 Grouse Ln MAIN GORE DRS CDS 427.00 ft East Vail 64.31 Thursday , September O1, 2005 3 of 5 ~ Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI ~ ID ` ~ . Description :.~ From ~ To ~ Length Zone ~ - OCI 4040.00 Meadow Dr West VAIL RD CDS 1,520.00 ft Main Vail 63.86 4035.00 Meadow Dr East GATE VAIL RD 510.00 ft Main Vail 63.74 2120.00 Davos Trail AROSA DR CORTINA LANE 188.00 ft North West Vail 63.71 2110.00 Arosa Dr DAVOS TRAIL N. FRONTAGE RD 1,654.00 ft North West Vail 63.10 6020.00 Springhill Ln VAIL VALLEY DR(S) CDS 451.00 ft Main Vail 62.85 4010.00 Vail Valley Dr S. FRONTAGE RD GOLD PEAK/MANOR VAIL 2,136.00 ft Main Vail 62.21 4030.00 Meadow Dr East VAIL VALLEY DR SLIFER PLAZA 443.00 ft Main Vail 61.00 8080.00 Meadow Dr JUNIPER LANE MAIN GORE DR 1,879,00 ft East Vail 60.90 8090.00 Juniper Ln MEADOW DR MAIN GORE DRS 1,458.00 ft East Vail 60.43 7080.00 Falline Dr FRONTAGE RD CDS 1,600.00 ft East Vail 59.80 8100.00 Meadow Ln MEADOW DR (EB} MEADOW DR 973.00 ft East Vail 58.13 7050.00 Booth Falls Rd BOOTH FALLS CT END 200.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 57.66 8130.00 Streamside Cir West BIGHORN RD (WB) BIGHORN RD 770.00 ft East Vail 57.46 2290.00 Westhaven Cir WESTHAVEN DR GREENHILL COURT 3,675.00 ft Cascade 57.38 4080.00 Willow Rd GORE-CREEK DR VAIL RD 635.00 ft Main Vail 55.98 4110.00 Hanson Ranch Rd A VAIL VALLEY DR HANSON R. f2D.-CHUTE 478.00 ft Main Vail 54.97 7010.00 Aspen Ct CDS ASPEN LN 191.00 ft Booth Creek Falls 54.96 3150.00 Ma Bell Rd N. FRONTAGE RD END 510.00 ft Main Vail 54.76 8142.00 Nugget Ln STR STREAMSIDE CIR W 100.00 ft East Vail 54.75 8000.00 Snowshoe Ln CDS MAIN GORE DR 5 386.00 ft East Vail 53.50 1980.00 Moraine Dr LIONS RIDGE LOOP CDS 800.00 ft North West Vail 51.34 4120.00 Village Center Rd E. MEADOW DR S. FRONTAGE RD 282.00 ft Main Vail 49.86 8240.00 Bighorn Rd MAIN .GORE DR N IRONGATE(EAST END) 2,520.00 ft East Vail 48.67 8166.00 Spruce Way COLUMBINE DR BIGHORN RD 1,689.00 ft East Vail 47.61 3040.00 Forest Rd BEAVER DAM RD STR 1,875.00 ft Main Vail 47.07 4130.00 Mill Creek Cir VAIL VALLEY DR MILL CREEK CIR 135.00 ft Main Vail 46.11 8140.00 Nugget Ln CDS STR 570.00 ft East Vail 43.10 4105.00 Gore Creek Dr VAIL VALLEY DR END(EAST) 680.00 ft Main Vail 41.54 6000.00 Vail Valley Dr PTARMIGAN RD EAST SUNBURST DR 1,963.00 ft Main Vail 39.31 3045.00 Forest Rd STR S. FRONTAGE RD 440.00 ft Main Vail 38.94 4050.00 Lionshead Cir East CDS S. FRONTAGE RD 1,334.00 ft Main Vail 35.67 4135.00 Mill Creek Cir MILL CREEK CIR MILL CREEK CIR 1,614.00 ft Main Vail .34.88 8050.00 Main Gore Dr CDS MEADOW DR 1,708.00 ft East Vail 28.48 2275.00 Westhaven Dr STR WESTHAVEN CIR 310.00 ft Cascade 28.44 8040.00 Black Gore Dr MAIN GORE DRS CDS 847.00 ft East Vail 26.28 4990.00 Chalet Rd VAIL VALLEY DR GORE CREEK DR 216.00 ft Main Vail 14.29 Thursday, September O1, 2005 4 of 5 Vail Pavement Inpsections-OCI S? °ID f""' `Description - ' . Farom To £3160.00 ~ _ Spruce Way CDS (EB) SPRUCE DR 8020.00 ~ Ute Ln CDS MAIN GORE DR S 3050.00 Lionshead Place CDS W. LIONSHEAD CIR 8150.00 Columbine Dr BIGHORN RD .LUPINE DR 1007.00 Kinnickinnick Ct 4045.00 Meadow Dr West ICE ARENA ICE ARENA Total Segments 147 ~` Length 2onei OGI 789.00 ft East Vail 6.55 229.00 ft East Vail 0.00 ' 430.00 ft Main Vail 0.00 1,157.00 ft East Vail 0.00 200.00 ft Intermountain 0.00 142.00 ft Main Vail Thursday, September 01, 2005 ~ 5 of 5 ~~ Description 2012 Est 2013 imated Yea Co 2014 sts 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Pavementlns elion 2006 $ 2007 15,000.00 2008 $ 2009 16,000.00 2010 $ 2011 17,000.00 $ 18,006.00 $ 19,000.00 11 800 00 $ $ 20,000.00 200 12 00 $ 12 00 600 $ $ 21,000.00 13 000 00 $ 00 13 600 $ $ 21,000.00 14,200.00 $ 15,000.E Data CollelioNlntem $ 8,000.00 $ 8,306.00 $ 8,600.00 $ 6,900.00 $ 9,400.00 $ 9,800.00 $ 10,200.00 $ 16,600.00 $ 11,000.00 60 28 000 $ $ 11,400.00 00 29 000 $ $ , . 060 00 30 $ . , 000 00 31 $ , . 32 000.00 $ , . 33,000.00 $ , . 34,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 36,000.00 Stri in $ 20,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 23,0011.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ , . , . 00 7 500 $ . , 500 00 7 $ . , 000 00 105 $ , 7 00 500 $ 7 500.00 $ 7 500.00 $ 7,560.00 $ 120,000.00 Crack Seal $ 5,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 5,000.06 $ 5,600.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 95,000.00 000 00 50 $ $ 7,500.00 75 000 00 $ $ 7,500.00 00 50 000 $ $ , . 00 75 000 $ . , 000.00 65 $ . , 85,000.00 $ , . 65,000.00 $ , 85,000.00 $ , 65,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 65,000.00 As ahltPatchi $ 50,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ . , , . , . , . 00 60 000 $ , 00 70 000 $ 00 000 70 $ 70 000 00 $ 000.00 70 $ 70 000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 80,060.E t R i $ 42 400 00 $ 50 000 00 $ 00 240 000 $ 00 000 35 $ 000.00 50 $ 60,000.00 8 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ , . . , . , , . , , 0 $ 00 000 35 Concre e r e a , . , . , . . , , 000 00 0 $ 10 000 00 $ 35 000 00 $ 00 10 000 $ 10,000.00 $ 35,006.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.0 . , GuaNrailR air $ 10,000.09 $ 35,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ . 1 , , . , . , . 8 000 00 275 $ 000 00 100 $ 100 000 00 $ 200 000.00 $ 200,060.00 $ 315,000.00 $ 150,000.00 f l S S $ 165 000 00 $ 00 200 000 $ 125,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 325,000.00 $ 550,000.00 . , . , , . , $ 00 000 300 ur ace ea 1.5" Oveda $ 300,000.00 $ , . 105,000.00 $ . , 555,000.00 $ 465,000.00 $ 330,000.60 $ 350,000.00 $ 610,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ BOO,000.DO . , 2"Mill and Oveda $ 175,000.00 375 00 000 $ 00 55 006 $ $ 275,000.00 000 00 65 $ 000 00 85 $ 400 000.00 $ 95,1100.00 8 95,000.60 $ 95,000.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 95,060.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $ 110,000.00 Drama a Ire rovement $ 450,000.00 $ 75,006.00 $ , . 00 000 $ , . 00 15 000 $ . , 00 30 000 $ , . 30 000 00 $ , 30 000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 00 0 Storm WaterMana emend $ 15,000.00 $ 30,006.00 $ 15, . , . . , , . , 30 000 00 $ 000 00 30 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ . 30,00 Bdd a Ire rovement $ 15,000.00 $ 30,0.00 $ 30,000.00 $ , . . , Sub Total $ 915,400.00 $ 674,300.00 $ 930,600.00 $ 957,900.00 $ 1,060,900.00 $ 774,300.00 $ 1,011,200.00 $ 1,033,100.00 $ 871,500.00 $ 336,900.00 $ 1,259,300.00 0 00 $ 683,200.00 320 00 68 $ $ 452,100.00 210 45 00 $ $ 1,389,500.00 1311 950 00 $ $ 570,100.00 57 010 00 $ $ 707,700.00 770.00 70 $ $ 971,000.00 97,1110.00 10%Contin e $ 91,540,00 $ 67,430.00 $ 93,060.00 $ 95,790.00 $ 106,090.00 $ 77,430.00 $ 101,120.00 $ 163,310.00 $ 81,150.00 650 00 958 $ 33,690.00 370 00 590 $ $ . 125,93 00 230 1 385 $ $ . , 520.00 751 S , . 497,310.00 , . $ 1,528,450.00 , . 627,110.00 $ , 718,470.00 S 1,066,100.00 TOTAL S 1,008,940.00 $ 741,730.00 S 1,023,660.00 1,053,890.00 $ 1,166,990.00 851,730.00 $ 1,112,320.00 ; 1,136,410.00 $ . , , . . , , , TOTAL BUDGET ED S 1,007,000.00 $ 742,000.00 3 1,025,000.00 $ 1,055,000.00 Pavement Inspection Data Cdlection/lntern Stripping Crack Seal Aspahft Patching Concrete Repair Guardrail Repair Surface Seal 1.5"Overlay 2"Mill and Overlay Drainagelmprovement Storm Water Management Bridge Improvement Lonp Term Capital Street Maintenance Budget Bi-Annual Surface Pavement Inspection of all the Town Roads. This allows us to montior and evaluate road conditbns. Collect and update GPS data i merrtory(Draiange, Street Lights, Signs, etc...) Stripe all of the Town roads, once in the spring and once i n the fall Seal cracks wthin all of the town roads. Towmvide every 5 years. Spot sealing every year. Full depth and skin asphalt patches as needed throughoutthe taw n. Concrete repairthoroghoulthetcwn. Guardrail repair throughout the town. Slurry and Chip seals on town roads as part of the towns pavement maintenance program . Asphalt overlays on town roads as part of the Town's pavement maintenance program Asphalt ovedays an town roads as part of the T oven's pavement maintenance program Drainage Improvement projects throughout the tow n. Maintenance of Stonn Sewer System, contract leaning, water qualihj improvement programs. MirarBddge improvements as iderdified in the biannual bridge inspection reports. Capital Facilities Maintenance Budget Background: Our main goal is to assure that the estimated life expectancies of our facilities are met or exceeded in a fiscally responsible manner. We maintain 20 buildings and numerous other facilities including parking structures, fountains, street lights, restrooms, bus shelters, and lift stations owned by the Town of Vail. We strive to assure that they are safe, functional, meet current codes including A..D.A.. requirements, and are aesthetically pleasing, at least as far as they were first intended. We also aim to improve our facilities whenever we do any work to them by making them more efficient, more functional, and more environmentally friendly. Currently, our major challenge is the fact that some of our buildings have attained or are about to attain their estimated lifespan. We determine lifespan by assessing construction type, year built, condition, and the qualityof the materials and equipment installed and any renovations done to a facility. We have not provided for building replacement in maintenance budgets as they are such large line items as to take up any discretionary funding and are better addressed through other funding methods. Required Maintenance: Depending on the facility, we determine a facility's condition using one or more of the following; structural and mechanical engineer assessment reports, systems testing, problem histories, energy assessment reports, environmental assessment reports, visual inspections and even user comments. Based on afore mentioned analysis we determine maintenance needs. We have implemented a routine preventative maintenance program which assures the continued day to day operation of all of our systems. Long term, we also track large ticket items such as boilers, fire systems and roofs and attempt to spread those costs out. However, as the buildings age more and more of these costly items will require attention at the same time. Future Needs: As our facilities age, the rate of deterioration increases and our repairs become less effective and more expensive. The fact that some of our facilities are still functional is a testament to our maintenance program and employees. It is time to seriously consider replacing buildings. Buildings near the end of their useful lives include the Municipal Building, Fire Station II, Lionshead Auxiliary Building, Lionshead Information Center, and Fire Station I. The Library is another building that will soon require such major repairs and replacements that it would be prudent to consider a re-evaluation. On the Recreation district side. The Golf Course Clubhouse and the Ford Park restrooms are in need of replacing. Buildings can be maintained for a very long time and are. Some of our buildings have undergone major renovations which usually take place in the latter half of their life expectancies. A major renovation extends the life expectancy of that facility beyond its original design. It can include new roofs, windows, upgrading exterior/interior aesthetics, ~~ mechanical and electrical systems, bringing the building up to current building and A.D.A. codes. Marty times, however, when a building is ready for a major renovation, there are also functional problems with the space. The demands for space may have outgrown the usefulness of it. At this point not only is the original building looked at from a renovation point of view, but an addition to the building is evaluated. The combination of major renovation and addition verses the possibility of tear down and rebuild determines the course of action on whether to replace a building or not. Future Wishlist: We wish we had some new buildings. VEHICLE PROCUREMENT AND REPLACEMENT PROCESS Background: In order to provide functional, cost-effective, environmentally friendly vehicles/equipment to the Town of Vail, the Fleet Division utilizes a joint acquisition process that involves the user department to determine what vehicles/equipment the department needs to perform its job duties. Their needs should be clearly known and the Fleet Division's responsibility is to identify. technology that can cost-effectively perform that task. During this process, alternatives to ownership are explored, such as leasing, renting or contracting the job out. Life cycle costs for all vehicles/equipment are tracked utilizing a computerized cost accounting system called Computerized Fleet Analysis (CFA). The most advantageous replacement frequency is not a preset, inflexible interval in usage, years, or maintenance cost. It is Fleet's goal to look at replacement of vehicleslequipment when the economic life cycle, or Replacement Zone, of vehicles/equipment has been reached, or the vehicle/equipment no longer meets the needs of the user department (functionally obsolete). Fleet maintains a ten year vehicle replacement plan and when a vehicle or piece of equipment has reached the Replacement Zone, as listed on the 10 year vehicle replacement plan, it is evaluated and prioritized as to whether it gets replaced or deferred or utilized within another function within the town. The town utilizes an internal service fund to pay for replacement of vehicles during their life. Fleet charges a monthly replacement fee to the user department for the vehicles/equipment that the department utilizes and these monies accumulate in a Heavy Equipment Fund (HEF). Through this internal service fund, the vehicle/equipment has funded its replacement when it reaches the end of its life cycle. Recycled or "re-used" units are vehicles or equipment that have completed their economic life in one area of fleet application (such as Police) but are retained in the fleet for lighter application or occasional usage. New units have replaced these vehicles in their original uses. The Fleet Manager shall evaluate mechanical history, downtime history and current condition to determine the feasibility of recycling. Required Maintenance: The town follows the recommended maintenance schedules that are provided with the vehicles/equipment that are purchased. Performing the recommended maintenance on the vehicles/equipment is important for many reasons: • Reduces operating costs by minimizing major component failures. • Reduces downtime due to unscheduled repairs. • Required for Commercial vehicles, such as buses, by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). • Minimizes our liability due to a failure that causes injury or property damage. • Maintain the Vail Standards ~~ CFA and other technologies such as oil analysis, engine analyzers, and on-board computer systems are utilized to provide a cost effective maintenance program. Future Needs: Fleet, in conjunction with the user departments, is looking at vehicles that use less fuel and are environmentally friendly, such as Hybrid buses and cars, and downsizing vehicles such as large SUV's to sedans or smaller SUV's. Departments/divisions seeking to increase its fleet size must seek approval from the Fleet manager, department director and town manager: Additional vehicles/equipment, if approved, are included in the capital projects budget and the operating and replacement charges are budgeted for in that department's general fund line item budget. Town of Vail 800 MHz Radio Replacement Cycle Project Description: The town is currently using Motorola radios that will be ten years old at the time of the proposed replacement in 2008. The current radio model is no longer in production and should be phased out of public safety by 2010..The proposed radio replacement would include amid-range radio for the public safety agencies and a lower grade radio for transportation and public works. Generally, radio life cycle for public safety radio would be five years and public works radios should be seven years. Project Justification: Having reliable and effective radio communications equipment is vital to ensuring the operational stability of the public safety, public works and transportation services within the Town of Vail. If not replaced on a regular schedule, the town's radio system users will experience deteriorated communications, equipment storages and increased radio maintenance cost. This lack of effective communications not only negatively impacts town operations but may also become a life safety issue. 15-Year Capital Asset Management (Millions) RETT Fund Discretionary, $50.8 , 2'0~ Capital Fund Discretionary, $27.9 , 12% Debt Service, g__._ , _ Capital Maintenance, $63.7 , 27% Capital Replacements, $70.4 30% Funds Available for New/Discretionary Projects s,ooo 6,000 4,000 2,000 (2,000) (4,000) (6,000} ^ Capital Projects Fund ^ Real Estate Transfer Fund ^ All Other Funds town of Veil Capdal Aeset Management 15-Year Projection Revenue Available f« Caaibl Puraoeee GenerelFund Cepibl Project Fund HEF Transfer From Otlrer Funds Sales end Trade-its Inc Sales Tax 0.02 Federal Greets Leases Project Reimbursement Eagle County Greet Revenue Interest Income & Other Capibl Project Fund Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund Real Estate Transfer Taz 3.0% GoN Course Lease 2.5% LoBery Revenue Trensf« from GF Reweatiorrel Amenity Fees 3.0% Interest Income 8 081er 3.0% Eermmked for Annual Maintenance and Landscaping 5.0% Reel Eatete Trenaf« Tex Fund Total Total Revsnue Exoerrdficea f« Ceodal MaiMerrence Bus Shelters Parking SWckaes Pmldng EgrripmeM Replacement FadGBes Em«emy Bullding Capital Maintenance Capihil Street Maintenance ADA CorrpGance Street Light Improvements fee Tmdc ReMdk! Hybrid Bus BaBay Repacement Computer SofbrerelHardware Webstb and ecommerce CADIRMS Capial Projects Fund Patls, Gwe Creek and Forest Health Pbygrourrd Captial Rec PathRreil Capital Maintenance ADA Comp4ancewlVRD Public Art Reaeation FadGties RETT Fund Total Capial Memtenance F*~+ndfieee fa Capital Replacement Fumibue and Erpripment Less than $5,000 -General Fund Heavy Equipment Replacements Copier MiG CreeklWillowlEast Vail Vail Vegey Drive Recenstnction East Vail Roads Reconstruction MaBedam Bridge Reconstruction Bridge Road Bridge RecaratrucGon Nugget Lane 8ddge Reoorstruction East & West Meadow Drive East Meadow Drive Heat Main Vail Flre Sbtian Renovation Buildng Remodels 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 71,333 73,100 74,900 76A00 77,900 79,500 81,100 82,700 84A00 86,100 97,800 89,600 91A00 93,200 95,100 97,000 581 522 388 413 753 028 729 735 749,119 664,659 1,182,543 981,178 602,241 863,552 430,746 938,167 450,213 1,071,921 934,622 879,311 , 101880 , 49330 , 931110 , 135 510 122 810 99640 247 760 172 410 84 210 115 370 96840 112120 66110 187430 131700 159 210 683,382 437,743 846,638 971,239 871,929 754,299 1A30,303 1,153,589 686A51 978,922 527,386 1,049,287 516,323 1,259,351 1,066,37! 1,038,521 400 349 6 217 776 6 840 633 6 6,886,000 7,018,560 7,191,400 7,367,040 7,514,800 7,665,000 7,818,000 7,974,000 8, 0 0 8 6,462,000 8,01;W 0 8,804,000 , , 1,740,240 , , 811,800 , , 3,780,000 1,120,000 510,000 600,000 600,000 00 000 150 150 000 000 150 000 150 0 600, 000 150 0 600, 150,000 150,000 ~ 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,0 , , , , , 895,468 27,000 - - 250,000 8T 000 - 19 000 16 000 11 000 . 17 000 20 000 20000 20 000 20000 ZO 000 20000 20000 20 000 20000 20 000 20 000 9A72,108 7,225,576 10,579,840 , 8,167,000 7,695,560 7,961,400 8,137,040 7,684,800 7,835,000 7,988,000 9,144,000 8,903,000 9,066,000 8,632,000 9A01,000 8,974,000 000 6 000 200 000 5 770 000 6 000 5 600 5,000,000 5,250,000 5,408,000 6,570,000 5,737,000 5,909,000 6,086,000 6,269,000 6,457,000 6,651,000 6,851,000 7,057,000 , , 115 956 , , 119 435 , , 018 123 , , 126,708 130,509 133,800 137,100 140,500 144,000 147,600 151,300 155,100 159,000 163,000 167,100 171,300 , 20 000 , 000 20 , 000 20 000 20 000 20 20,0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 , , , , , 10,762 10,762 000 360 000 125 125 000 25 000 25,000 25,000 25,800 26,606 27,400 28,200 29,000 29,900 30,600 31,700 32,700 33,700 , 82,300 , 58,000 , 57,000 , 65,000 75,000 77,300 _. 79,800 .. -- .. _-. 82,000 .. °- ..., 84,500 ,. „.~ ~,.,,, 87,000 ,. Ma .,,,,,, 89,600 M MA mn\ 92,300 ,~ ,u un~ 95,100 rr yea enm 98,000 n ~5 anm 100,900 r9 d73 4001 103,900 12.597.100) 15,417,850 11,887,273 17,083,807 13,506,781 1 1 14,470,587 14, 38,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 30,000 - 40 000 31,000 000 910 11,000 000 055 1 31,000 000 860 11,000 100 000 1 - 575,000 32,000 740,000 12,000 780,000 32,000 780,000 12,000 785,000 790,000 508,740 627,000 705,000 485,000 480,000 , 5 , , , , , , 000 420 331 500 000 365 000 455 000 810 400,000 755,000 430,000 500,000 1,950,000 695,000 605,000 640,000 870,000 , 635,000 620,000 695,000 780,000 , , 25 000 , 000 25 , 25 000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 565 1 584 , 1,006,940 , 741,730 , 1,023,660 1,053,690 1,168,990 851,730 1,112,320 1,136,410 958,650 370,590 1,385,230 751,520 491,310 000 15 1,528,450 000 15 627,110 15 000 , , 10 000 000 10 10 000 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 , , , 50,000 , 50,000 , 50,000 , 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 . 60,000 60,000 60,000 80,000 • 250,000 - - - 80,000 294,000 - 88,400 91,000 140,488 58,000 72,000 43,000 52,000 75,000 45,000 55,000 80,000 48,000 58,000 83,000 5 000 50,000 23 OW 60,000 000 15 85,000 15 000 50,000 25 000 50,000 12,000 20,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 20,000 15,OOb 15,000 60000 20,000 BO 000 15,000 120 ~0 , 1 62000 , 82000 , 82 000 , 62000 , 125000 186 290 50000 50000 50000 60 50000 917 690 2 100 000 990 2 408 40 000 730 482 2 60000 395 3'10 4 2,974,410 3,193,650 1,875,590 3,064,230 2,918,920 2,166,310 3,262,450 2,568,110 2,891,581 2,213,940 2,408,730 2,318,6 , , , , , , , , 597 816 430 000 580 065 1 480,378 492,402 509,074 520,946 533,025 545,315 551,825 575,560 1,893,526 601,732 615,185 833,890 647,857 , 2111,888 , 425,000 , , 200,000 - - 000 605 100,000 500 577 - 000 857 - 000 40 41,200 - 42,436 43,709 - 45,020 200,000 48,371 250,000 47,762 - 49,195 500,000 50,671 352,118 520,000 970,000 1,020,000 , , , , 50,000 187,419 50,000 75,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 80,000 80,000 60,000 80,000 80,000 65,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 90,000 50 000 1,700,020 1,500,000 2,360,580 1,515,378 1,172,402 1,266,574 1,257,946 653,02.5 668,515 680,261 704,269 2,023,548 933,103 997,947 768,085 1,288,528 4,591,601 3,713,940 4,769,310 3,994,038 4,090,092 3,675,564 3,740,6)6 5,048,345 3,640,925 3,873,911 2,679,859 5,107,776 3,850,023 3,164,257 4,050,535 3,676,638 71 333 100 73 74 900 400 78 77,900 79,500 81,100 82,700 84,400 88,100 87,600 89,600 91,400 93,200 95,100 97,000 , 519,920 , 377,100 , 731,095 , 714,300 727,300 645,300 1,148,100 952,600 584,700 838,400 418,200 908,900 437,100 1,040,700 907,400 853,700 10,310 - • 4,100,000 - - . - . - 1,500,000 - - - - - 4,400,000 - - - - - _ 1,000,000 _ - _ 1,300,000 - . . - - 1,000,000 - - - . - - - 2,800,000 - - - - _ - - - 2,100,000 - - 975,000 50,000 - - - 55,000 - - 61,000 - - - 67,000 - - - 74,000 - - 81,000 - - - - - 90,000 Tobl 63,667A90 CAM 1 9111200 Long-tens Capital Gina Town of Veil Capital Aeeet Management 15-Year Projection Creekside Housing Improvements Buaard Pads Housing Improvements Gore Tank Upgrade CommuNca4ons East Veil Interchange Main Vail Improvements Flre Truck Replacement Flre BrealNng Apparehu E Veil Rado Tower 800 Radio Equipment Buses Capital Projects Fund RETT Fund -Street Fumihrre Ford Perk Improvements GoH Course & Clubhouse Improvements Dobson Ice Arena Tennis Center Improvements Youth Services Improvements Gymnastics Center Native Center Total Cepitel Repboemente Debt Service end F'erenoina Timber Ridge Loen Timber Ridge Debt Service Guarentee Debt Service on Outstanding Bonds Debt Service and Financina AveBabb AnnueOrfa NewlDbaetkmarv Profecb Capital Projects Fund Real Estate Trensfer Fund Ap Other Furrds Total AvaBabb AnmreOy DbaeOorrerl4New Projeob Included in F'nrsYeer Plan Doasnent Imaging Patrol Car Video Cameras Fro Tnx9r VeNde E>~ension Fire infresEucdse Improvements Flber Optics in Buildings Donovan Park Pavilion Mule-Purpose ReaeaBon Fadily West 8 East Meadow (hive East Meadow DriveStreetscapeHaat Vipege Streetscape Buydown Program Lionshead Improvements Intermodal Slte Revise TOV Master Plans I-70 Noise Way Boding Improvements Stream Treat Incursion Survey WNte Water ParklPromenage Bridge IJonshead Perk Booth Creek Redeveloprtrent Fad Park Master Paln Irt~rovements ViOege Streetscwpe (RETT) Meadow Drive (RETT) DiecretionerylNew Projects Not Yet Included Flre Trudr AddBon Inc 2005 2006 5,000 25,000 30,000 2007 2008 2009 5,000 5,000 5,000 4!15,000 - - 2010 60,000 5,000 25,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 Total 500,000 250,000 - 300,000 - - _ - - - - 350,000 550,000 - 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 - - - - 1,000,000 • 1,000,000 - - - 546,000 - 596,500 - - - 109,000 - 6,000 6,000 693,000 99,000 99,000 99,000 2 699 980 501000 - 3 854 200 143400 2199600 1,203,400 2,735,290 542,000 1,521,000 4,552,200 2802,400 7,488,600 8,817,400 37 030 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 , 262,500 - - - 54,000 220,000 463,750 468,900 100,000 252,541 350,000 - 77,20D 700,000 45,000 80,000 56,000 61,625 - - 80,000, - 30,000 - - - - - - - 75,000 - - - 140,000 - 3,363,573 1,585,700 2,897,370 5,914,000 4A32,600 8,760,941 8,635,600 000 147 99,000 99,000 99,000 155,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 163,000 , 3502400 3465600 5495170 204455 000 405 1,114,000 1,003,500 1,481,000 3,667,400 3,569,600 104,000 5,599,170 367,455 , 30,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 350,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 240,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 70,000 - - - . - - 527,D00 - - - - - 20,000 - 175,000 - - - - - - 1,910,300 2,660,100 2,293,000 2,182,000 4,940,900 7,12A,100 1,732,900 7,405,670 4,658,155 700,000 - - - - 925,000 2,422,154 2,236,200 2,322,497 2,321,825 - 2,320,363 2,317,803 2,323,004 2,124,692 4,047,154 2,236,200 2,322097 2,321,825 2,320,363 2,317,3 2,323,004 2,124,692 - - - - - (201,917) 2,233,436 4,327,613 (1,025,685) (344,893) (4,253,993) (3,486,094) 759,786 3,686,590 3,790,850 3 4,787,410 3 2,151,370 2 2,579,480 3 5 6,361,690 3 519,38D 3 6,018,435 3 ~ 3~15 2~6 ~ 1 3 2 2 2 2 82 3200 988 3101,681 140 522 09186 139387 79223 218 651 156 922 18482 63 462 843 60 5543 1 158 939 144 629 08 999 203 2 3,415,522 4,899,933 7,640,005 1,922,998 2,334,383 (1,529,868) (495,437) 4,359,051 7,259,028 7,474,911 8,498,327 4,681,911 6,209,100 10,155,494 4,573,517 9,874,290 • 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 45,000 - - - - 735,000 - - 40,300 - - - . 270,63ri 2,500,000 725,000 - - 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 42,0 - - ' 88,000 - - - - 199,360 900,000 950,000 1,320,000 - - 965,000 1,025,000 - - 2,419,615 1,535,300 - 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 313,955 - - - 3,750,000 - 10D,000 - - - - - - - - 528,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 - - 79,284 - - - 35,000 250,000 100,000 690,000 250,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,OD0,000 2,300,000 1,250,000 25,000 1,025,000 800,000 1,080,000 - - - 535,000 - - - - - - - - - - 70,396,909 20,013,539 27,903080 50,783,834 2,365,869 81,053,163 9!1!200 CAM 2 Long-tens Capital Gina Town of Ve0 Capital Asset Management 15•Year Projection Inc 2005 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 E. Vail Flre StaBon • Nex Bay 775,000 - Library Remodel (ndudes 3rd tbor) - 5,750,000 - - TovmShop Master Plan Improvements - - - 5,650,000 - ' WestUellFlreStation - - 1,430,000 - - LH Aratl6ary Bwlding Renovation - - 875,000 - - InformatlonCenter Rerave8on - - - 550,000 - - ' Munidpal Buildng Renovation - - - 2,400,000 - - Simba Run Undrpass - - - - 12,000,ODO - ' 815 000 S. Frontage Road -Lionshead - - 5,000,000 - - - - , 000 570 S. Frontage Road -Ford Perk - - 4,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000 , S. Frontage Road • East Vail - - - 000 000 2 - N. Frontage Road - West Va(I - - - - , , 1'000'000 N. Frontage Road • Sandstone - - - - - - - 500,000 GIS TownWldeVideoSeauily 350,000 350,000 350,000 25,000 - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Master plan Updates - - - 50,000 58,000 - - 65,000 Intermodel Site (LionsHead Improvements-TIF) 10,000,000 LionsHead Streetscepes 5,000,000 Vail Vatley DrlveNeil Road Forest Heallh 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2'000'000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Major Building Projeeb: LionsHead Irdo Boolh LlcnsHead AmdGary Brdidng LioraHead Perking Shudure Creeksfde Employee Housing Munidpal BuOding Replacement GoH Couse Clubiwuse Nahae Center Fad Park Atldetio Fleld Restraom New BuOdings: Youth Center ., ReaeeBon Center Vitlage Lowing FadSty Perking Sbudare E~ansion Perfomdrrg Arts Center Conference Center 2017 2018 2019 2020 - - 75,000 - Total Long-tens Capital Gina CAM 3 9111200: ..~ / r „ \ 1 ~ CtY~' I '.~~ _• _ ~E ~!" 11:33sgft ~ r,~~ ~ CREF . -- ~ __- r~_ ~ ~~,r,,~ - 9}sgtt';,°~ ~ 33sgft w ~_ ~ 72sgft ~ $ ~ -y 554s ft _-~"___,~- q ~,__ ; 517sgft ~ ___ ~` ~ ~ V 1 1 sgft •'~{ ~ 28s ft ' °'' ~ x q ~, w ~~ A w ~ ~ ~~ 19sgft ; ~~j ea FBI i ; ~ ,, ~ ~ ~ 28sgft `' oC ~ ~ ~'I} \ MILL CREEK COURT q BUILDING 33sgft oooR ' `' " u ~ 1O9sgft p~j ~ ` " ~ oG 1O3sgft ~ ~ U 37sgft ~ / ..-- - l ~ a 181 sgft / ~ ,, ~ '" ~I ~ 94sgft ~ ', 187sgft ~~ ~ ~ y" ~~~~ 1 353sgft ,;, / 1~1 198sgft o--~ '"~ ~~ ~ ~ OP ~~~~Yr y ~~. ~ ~ } ~ , ~~~ RAMP, PLANTERS, AND WALLS (TOV) ~• •~•~~ `- ~ ! ~ - 2298 sgft ~~ 26sgft ~ ` /r ~ ~ ~ ~ °Y ACCESSABLE SURFACE (TOV) 1 ``yam h/ . ~... ~__. __. 735 sgft 124sgft ~ .: _ ~~ ~ j./" ~OP9 Ar^ Hari ~~ff----~ RAMPS, PLANTERS, AND WALLS (MCC) '' j ~ _d~ 1'~ E ::.....~ - 224 sgft ~ ~~ ~ / ~~' ~~ i - ~ , ;max WALKABLE SURFACE (MCC) + "`,~:y~j~ ~" ~~ ~ yi ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1924 sgft ~, + ~ ' ~; ` , ~.~~ ''~ \ 0 5 10 20 ~~ NONM SCALE: 1'10'-0' MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Conference Center Advisory Committee 8~ Town Staff DATE: September 6, 2005 SUBJECT: Conference Center Ballot Decision Staff: Russell Forrest 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this discussion on the conference center is to brief Council on the Guaranteed Maximum Price for the conference center and to request input on the ballot language to put forward to voters on November 8, 2005. Two items are scheduled for the September 6th Town Council meeting regarding the conference center: An afternoon worksession to review the guaranteed maximum price for the facility and the Committee's recommendation for managing the debt service of the project. Staff would also appreciate any input on the proposed ballot language in Resolution 16 and the proposed language in Resolution 17 which provides a trigger mechanism for initiating up to a 1.5% lodging tax for the operation and construction of the conference center. An evening meeting to approve, disapprove, or modify: A) Resolution 16, Series of 2005 which sets forth language to have a ballot measure on the November 8th election which would ask voters to increase the lodging tax for the conference center, and B) Resolution 17, Series of 2005 which would state the Town Council's intent on collecting up to 1.5% of new lodging tax for the conference center. 2. BACKGROUND On April 20, 2004, the Council authorized a series of next steps which included interviewing owner's representative firms for the conference center. On April 29, 2004, the conference center advisory committee (Committee) met to interview five owner's representative firms. On May 18, 2004, the Council authorized the town manager to execute a contract with Architectural Resource Consultants, Inc. to be the Town of Vail's (Town) owner's representative and funding for the first phase of this contract or $8,510. The Council also authorized the Committee to negotiate with both Piper Jaffray and Kirtpatrick Pettis to be the Town's investment banker on this project. On June 1, 2004, the Council voted to approve the following requests from the Committee: • Authorization to engage Piper Jaffray as the Town's investment banker for the conference center; • authorization to issue a request for qualifications (RFQ) for design team assistance on the conference center; • .request to move forward with a negotiated guaranteed maximum price (GMP) process for engaging a design team and a general contractor (as opposed to a design build process). This essentially means that both the architect and general contractor will work for the Town; • request for the Council to approve the next phase of an owner's representative contract. The preconstruction phase of the contract would cost up to $155,774. However, the Committee is only requesting $93,212 (includes fees and reimbursables) to fund this function until a decision is made by the Council to issue bonds which is anticipated in the November/December 2004 time frame. On June 15, 2004, the Council reviewed and approved the following next steps: • Approval of the proposed process for engaging the public in the design team selection process; • selection criteria for request for proposals; • consideration of proposed process givens; • review of updated project budget and interrelated parking costs; and • consideration and review of the major points of the proposed scope of service request for proposals for design services (to be given to the top 3-4 teams selected in the qualification competition). On July 6, 2004, the Council reviewed and approved the following next steps: Review the recommendation -from the Committee on short-listing the design team candidates and to issue the request for proposals (RFP) to the six recommended design teams; review and approve suggested changes to the design team selection process from the Committee; and request permission to issue an RFP for a surveyor to survey the Lionshead parking structure site and surrounding area. On July 20, 2004, the Council unanimously approved the following: • A contract for design services with Fentress Bradburn; and • approval of next steps for master planning the Lionshead parking structure/conference center site. On September 21, 2004, the Council, the Committee, Design Review Board (DRB) and Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) reviewed five alternative site plans. In addition, the public reviewed the same alternatives on September 22, 2004. The near unanimous opinion from the various groups that reviewed the site plans was that alternative three is the preferred choice. On October 19, .2004, the Council met and reviewed an update on architectural images for the conference center and authorized the Committee to move forward with public discussions regarding the alternative styles. The Committee met on October 21, 2004, and reviewed the qualifications submitted by six general contractors. After reviewing the qualifications, the Committee recommended to the Council that three general contractors receive requests for proposals (RFP}. Those general contractors include: ^ Hansel Phelps Construction ^ Hunt Construction Group/Hyder Construction ^ M.A Mortenson Company On November 2, 2004, the Council approved a motion to forward the above mentioned contractors RFPs. The design team of Fentress Bradburn developed three alternative architectural approaches. These images were not the elevations of the proposed conference center but rather provided alternative visions or inspirations that could be considered for the conference center. The three styles include: ^ Bavarian/Traditional Vail style ^ Contemporary ^ Natural/Environmentally inspired style The Committee reviewed the public input associated with the three design alternatives on November 18, 2004. After reviewing the public input and the associated costs with each design option, the Committee forwarded a recommendation for the "architectural vision inspired by nature." The Committee felt that this would create an outstanding architectural structure. The materials as envisioned by the design team would utilize "mountain" materials such as heavy stone and timbers. The roof element would be more iconic but is intended to reflect the form of the surrounding mountains. It should also be noted that one member of the Committee, although not present on November 18, 2004, preferred the traditional.Vail vernacular look. On December 7, 2004, the Council voted 6-1 to direct the conference center design team to move forward with a "natural/environmentally inspired" design style. The Committee met on December 14, 2004, and voted to recommend that the Town purchase (using conference center funds) the water and sewer taps for the charter bus lot site. On December 21, 2004 the Council authorized that the Town purchase tap fees with the condition that the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (District) provide a letter confirming that a tap fees could be used on the same site for a different use in the future and that the tap fees could be moved to another Town owned land. The District did provide a letter confirming this issue referencing the District's policies for doing tap transfers. The final cost of the tap fee was $297,896. On January 18, 2005, the Council voted to continue to move in the direction of the "natural" design. The Council did express concern about the roof of the facility. Furthermore, they asked that the design team develop alternative ideas for the roof of the facility. On March 15, 2005, the Council received an update on the operational plan, design, and capital budget for the conference center. The Committee also forwarded a recommendation to the Council to issue an RFP for operations, management, and marketing. In addition, the Committee recommended forwarding the design to the general contractors for pricing. The Council approved both recommendations. On March 17, 2005 the Council received a comprehensive update on the critical elements of the conference center. In addition, they considered three basis alternatives for the conference center. These alternatives included: Option A: Discontinue all work and expenditures on the project: If the Council is fundamentally uncomfortable with the risks associated with the project, then discontinuing all work on the project is a viable alternative. A future discussion would then be required regarding the disposition of existing funds co-lected for the conference center and how the dedicated lodging and sales tax for the conference center is addressed. Option B: Implement the existing program and obtain additional revenue to pay for the budget overage. The current project design can not be built with the funds available today and budget parameters that limit debt service at $2.7 million per year. Option B involves bringing ballot language forward to the Council in August of 2005 and keeping the same basic design Option C: Reduce the cost of the facility and work within the existing revenue budget for the project. This option involves reducing the cost of the existing facility by cutting the size and scope of the facility. Staff recommends not cutting the facility to below 32,000 sq. feet meeting space based on the HVS study. After significant public input and Council deliberation, the Council directed staff to: Implement option B which involved moving forward with the existing program while reducing costs to the reasonable extent possible. This step involves moving forward with the existing design and reviewing it with Town boards. In addition, Council directed staff to develop ballot language that would not only provide additional revenue for the construction of the facility but also an additional $1.5 million per year over and above annual debt service to pay for operational deficits. 4 4. SUMMARY OF EXISTING REVENUE AND CONSTRAINTS FROM THE 2002 ELECTION The current project financing through bonds is subject to several constraints, some of which place significant interest rate risk on the ability to use municipal bonds to meet the complete funding requirements of the project. The first set of constraints is based on the ballot question approved by voters in 2002. Listed below is a summary of these 2002 ballot created parameters: Bond Summary • Maximum Principal amount $50,060,000. • Maximum Annual Town Repayment Cost $3,830,000. • Maximum Total Town Repayment Cost $95,610,000. • No specified term limit on bonds. Tax Summary • Levy of a Town lodging tax at 1.50%. • Increase of Town sales tax by 0.50% to a total Town sales tax of 4.50%. • Sales and lodging tax terminate when the debt is paid in full. The second set of constraints placed on the bonds is related to the ability to sell the bonds. in a cost effective manner. If the debt can be structured so that the bond issue receives an investment grade rating from the national rating agencies (i.e. Standard & Poor's and Moody's) then the town may be able to secure an insurance commitment from a national municipal bond insurer. Issuing the bonds under this structure could substantially lower the borrowing costs to the Town. When the bond issue is presented to the rating agencies they will look at several factors including the debt coverage ratio of the revenue stream to. the debt service. When the rating agencies look at municipal bonds they typically look for at least 1.20 times minimum coverage for investment grade ratings (coverage = annual revenue -operating and maintenance expenses _ annual debt service). Based on the revenue projections provided to the Town of Vail. the new annual debt service will need to be $2,700,000 or less in order to achieve a 1.20 times debt service coverage ratio. Since the amount of annual debt service that can be paid is limited by these constraints, the factor that changes are moves in interest rates. The percent changes the amount of project funds that debt service can support. For example, when interest rates increase, more of the annual debt service must be used for interest, thus limiting the principal that can be repaid. Since the bonds were initially approved in 2002 the interest rate environment has gradually risen. While rates have recently decreased slightly there still has been an upward trend and based on comments and actions of the Federal Reserve many market participants expect this trend to continue. Displayed in the graph below is the history of the 10-year U.S. _ Treasury from 1/1/03 through 5/6/05. 10-Year U:S. Treasury Note (January 2003 to May 2005) 5.00 ... ......... ......... ......... ...... ........................................ ...... ......... ........ ...................... 4.80 .. ......... ......... ......... ...... ................................ ... .:.... ........ ...................... 4.60 ... ......... ......... ......... ..... .......:.............................. ... ......... ........ ..................... 4.40 .. ......... ...:..... ...... ............. ....... ..... ...... ......... .......... ... 4.20 ... ......... ......... ........ ...... ......... :.....: ............ ...... .. .... .... . . .... .. ......... 0 v_ 4.00 ..... ......... .. ...... ................ .... ......... ...... ..... .... .................... d } 3.80 ... ..... . ........ ..... .. ...... ...................................... ...... ......... ......... ..................... 3.60 ... ...:..... ..... .. ........ ...... ........................................ ...... ......... ......... ..................... 3.40 ... ......... ........ .. ..... ...... ........................................ ...... ......... ......... ..................... 3.20 ... ......... ......... ....... ...... ..............................:......... ...... ......... ......... ..................... 3.00 M O M O M O M O M O M- ~. a ~ O O O O ~ O ~ O ~ O M In O O O N O N O ~V O ~V O N O O O O N N N N O C`V O ~V O ~V O O N N M M M M M f` f` ~ CM C` M M M C\ M r M In f~ W ~ M O h W r Cq 5. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE TOWN COUNCIL A. Review of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Mortenson Construction has received subcontractor bids for the existing design of the facility. They will have provided a signed Guaranteed Maximum Price contract by the Town Council meeting September 6th to build the conference center and 320 parking spaces for $ 53,376,740, subject to Town of Vail execution after the election. This price will remain valid through April 1, 2006, and includes preconstruction services already authorized by Town Council for work through the election of $54,000. . The following table summarizes the current costs: Description 06-Sep-05 Construciton Cost $ 53,376,740 Soft Cost $ 4,700,000 FF&E $ 525,000 Housing $ 1,845,000 Contingenc $ 4,326,125. Total $ 64,772,865 6 The total project budget of $64,722,865 includes the 125 spaces Vail Resorts is paying $4.3 million to construct under the conference center. If $4.3 million is backed out of the total cost the Town of Vail is financing, the grand total of the project is then reduced to $ 60,472,865. Attachment A is a PDF of a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the costs associated with the conference center. B. Review Options for paving for the Guaranteed Maximum Price and the Operational Deficit and associated Cash Flow Models. Attachment 6 summarizes the associated lodging tax to pay for the conference center. The Conference Center Advisory Committee met on August 31 Sc and recommended the following: • The Committee assumed that the $4.3 million would be accepted by the Vail Town Council to help pay for parking. This would then bring the total project cost to $ 60,472,865. • $3 million would be used from the cash fund balance of the project, which is estimated to be close to $10 million by the end of 2005, to reduce the amount financed from $60, 472,865 to $57,472,865. The average annual debt service on $57,472,865 at today's interest rate plus 50 basis points (1/2 of 1%) is $3,707.221. • If approved a .79% lodging tax would be initiated effective January 1, 2006, and the Town Council would have the discretion to initiate another .71 % lodging tax if the total cash fund balance was reduced below $5,000,000. • The .79% incremental lodging tax, along with the current conference center taxes, will provide the amount of the average annual debt service plus 20% of that amount to equal a 1.2 times debt service coverage ratio, which expected to be required when the bonds are issued. Since the 20% coverage is not cash needed to repay the debt, it will be available to pay for operational costs. The amount available from this source for operations is $741,444. • The additional incremental .71 % lodging tax that the Council could collect would generate another $824,000 .per year for an operational deficit. With a full 1.5% . collection a total of $1,565,444 is available for paying for an operational deficit and grows over time. • The cash fund balance is not projected to go below $5,000,000 under this scenario. See attachment C for pro-formas for the project assuming the additional operating tax is not needed and another that assumes the full 1.5% is collected. C. Ballot Language: Resolution #16, Series of 2005 Resolution 16, Series of 2005, would submit to the electors of the Town at the regular municipal election to be held on November 8, 2005, a ballot issue concerning the issuance of bonds and an increase in lodging taxes to finance the conference center (Attachment D). The key points of the ballot language include: • Authorization to collect 1.5% in Lodging Tax. • Council can increase (up to 1.5%) or decrease the tax if needed. . • If the ballot initiative fails, the authorization for collecting the conference center lodging and sales tax from the 2002 ballot would be terminated. • If approved, the lodging tax from 2002 and the new lodging tax would not sunset. D. Resolution 17, Series of 2005: Trigger for Lodging Tax Resolution 17, Series of 2005 is a resolution expressing the intention of the Town Council with respect to the implementation of the lodging tax which is being submitted to the electors of the Town at the regular municipal election to be held on November 8, 2005 (Attachment E). The resolution also expressed the intention of the Council that no revenues of the Town will be used to support the conference center other than the lodging tax being submitted at the November 8, 2005 election, the lodging tax and sales tax levied pursuant to Question 2B (approved at the 2002 election), and the revenues derived from the operation of the conference center. This resolution essentially articulates the trigger for initiating up to 1.5% in lodging tax as discussed above is section 5.B. E. Parkin Af the last meeting of the Town Council on August 15th, the Town Council reviewed the material below and choose to defer this decision to September 6th. It is now critical to decide whether to use the $4.3 million offered by Vail Resorts for parking under the conference center so that the ballot language can be written accurately. Site Selection in 2003 In November 2002, a ballot was approved in the Town to establish a dedicated lodging and sales tax for the purposes of building and operating a conference center. The proposed site at the time was the Vail Resorts owned Holy Cross maintenance facility site. In 2003, Vail Resorts began to actively plan for the redevelopment of Lionshead and realized that the Holy Cross site was a critical site for their own employee parking. Vail Resorts offered the Town $4.3 million for public parking if an alternative site was selected for the conference center. This value of $4.3 million was the approximate value of Vail Resorts cost to relocate its maintenance facilities. The Vail Town Council evaluated the pros and cons of locating the conference facility at the charter bus site and the Holy Cross site. It was concluded by the Council that the most appropriate site was the charter bus site. This site would allow new parking to be developed with the conference center to be utilized with the existing 1100 parking spaces to optimize parking for the conference center and the general public. Zonino and PEC Input The site is zoned General Use which allows the flexibility in determining the development parameters for the site. At the Julj+ 25th PEC meeting, the commission indicated that the conference center should provide 243 spaces for parking. This parking space number is based on the zoning code requirement in section 12-10-10 which provides a parking schedule for "theaters, meeting rooms, and conference facilities" at a ratio of 1.O space per 165 sq. ft. of conference facility seating floor area. The project currently has 320 parking spaces with 250 net new spaces. Seventy parking spaces are displaced on the existing parking structure due to the relocation of the entrance. The parking would be managed and operated by the Town. The existing 1100 spaces and the new 250 spaces would be operated as one public parking facility. Parking Study Felsburg Holt and Ullevig working on behalf of the Town of Vail Public Works Department prepared a parking analysis based on HVS' use projections. They evaluated an extreme parking scenario of a conference and evening event occurring in the winter at the same time as a peak ski day. The frequency of this type of event would be one time every 2-3 years. This is the only scenario which would place more parking on the Frortage Road. They also used a design day of a 90tH percentile event occurring during the day and in the evening per the HVS study which would simulate events occurring during a day that the Frontage Road would be used for parking. On all other days, except for the extreme event occurring once every 2-3 years, the 250 parking spaces built under the conference center would reduce the frequency of parking on the Frontage Road. If an event occurred on a peak ski day then there would be the ability to segregate or reserve parking for the conference facility. Staff proposed only segregating 125 spaces during times when the facility is used and frontage road parking is anticipated. .The conclusion was that 125 parking spaces would be adequate to maintain parking for the conference center on a peak ski day. The 125 space addition is felt to. be adequate because peak conference center events will not take place during the day-time in the winter when parking is most critical for skiers. It was also concluded that providing a total of 250 spaces would reduce both the total number of car days on the-Frontage Road by 7000 to 8000 per season and reduce the number of days on the Frontage Road by approximately 10.days while providing adequate parking for the conference center (See Attachment F). Again the premise behind locating the conference facility at the charter bus lot is that very few (5 conferences) conferences are anticipated in the winter months during the day and that any parking created for the conference center would be available for public parking when it is most needed. In the summer and shoulder seasons when there is significant capacity in the Lionshead parking structure in the day, the conference center would benefit from additional parking which the existing parking structure provides. Specific Action Requested of the Council The parking cost of this project is a critical component of the overall budget. Staff would like to propose that we comply with zoning by building 250 net new parking spaces. Vail Resorts has committed $4.3 million for parking under the conference center. Staff would propose that we comply with the PEC request to provide 243 spaces. The primary question is whether Vail Resorts funding should be accepted to help pay for the proposed parking underneath the parking structure. The alternative would be to increase the amount of the project budget for the conference center an additional $4.3 million to pay for the full total of 250 net new parking spaces. Vail Resorts has indicated verbally they are still willing to commit $4.3 million in parking even if it is helping to satisfy the conference centers parking requirement as long as it is available for public parking when not needed for a conference center use. Impact if $4.3 million is not accepted If the 4.3 million is not accepted for use under the conference center then the amount the Town would need to finance would be $61,772,865. The total debt service on this amount is $3,984,588 and the minimum lodging tax to cover the debt service at a 1.2 coverage is 1.08% versus .79%. If the total authorization was maintained at 1.5% this would also reduce the amount of funds available to offset an operational loss. 6. NEXT STEPS The following are critical next steps in the conference center process • September 7`h: Council will. be asked to consider a resolution to place a ballot initiative on the November 2005 ballot • PEC DRB decisions in September and October of 2005. Note: PEC may still put requirement or conditions on the project or potentially not approve the project and thus require an appeal to Council. • November 8th: Election io Attachments A. Powerpoint Presentation on the Guaranteed Maximum Price B. Funding Summary C. Pro Formas for Funding Summary D. Resolution 16, Series of 2005: Ballot Language E. Resolution 17, Series of 2005: Trigger threshold for Lodging Tax F. Parking Analysis from FHU F:\cdev\COUNCIL\MEMOS\05\conference center081605.doc 11 Attachment A Powerpoint Presentation on the Guaranteed Maximum Price Attachment B Funding Summary Vail Conference Center Proposal as of September 1, 2005 Total Project Costs Vail Resorts Parking Contribution Town Costs Reserve Fund Contribution Amount Financed Average Annual Debt Service New Tax New Tax for Debt Service at Maximum Only 1.5% $ 64,772,866 $ 64,772,866 4,300,000 4,300,000 60,472,866 60,472,866 3,000,000 3,000,000 $ 57,472,866 $ 57,472,866 $ 3,707,221 $ 3,707,221 Incremental Lodging Tax For Debt Service (including 1.2 X coverage) 0.787% 0.787% Incremental Lodging Tax to Reach 1.5% 0.713% Total Incremental Lodging Tax 0.787% 1.500% Total Tax Rate on Lodging (includes TOV, county,state, VLMD) 12.59% 13.30% Operating Deficit -First Year of Operations $ 1,325,483 $ 1,325,483 Net Cash Flow -First Year of Operations $ (455,199) $ 396,171 Fund Balance Available 12/31/05 $ 6,907,090 $ 6,907,090 Fund Balance Available 12/31/07 $ 6,883,098 $ 8,499,773 Fund Balance Available 12/31/12 $ 6,252,878 $ 12,432,448 Fund Balance Available 12/31/35 $ 24,628,260 $ 63,957,085 Assumptions: Sales and Lodging Tax Projections per Bernstein and Associates through 2012; inflated 2% thereafter $4.3 million contribution from Vail Resorts for parking received December 2005 Debt service per Piper Jaffray 09/01/05 Operating losses per HVS Capital maintenance fund included in cash flow per HVS Pre-operating marketing costs of $1.5 million included in cash flow; not reimbursed from bond proceeds Town of Vail management fee of 5% included in cash flow 050906 Town Council 9/1/05 Attachment C Pro Formas for Funding Summary TOWN OF VAIL REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -1.5 % NEW TAX 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 200$ Projection 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2071 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Project Costs and Financing Total Pro ed Bontl Proceeds 57,700,000 - 57,700,000 - - - - Costsoflssuance ~ (1,644,631) - (1,644,631) - - - - - , Interest on Investment of Bond Proceeds 1,417,497 1,166,639 249,102 1,756 - - Ne[ Cash Proceeds from Bonds 57,472,868 ~ - 57,222.000 249,702 1,756 - - Vail Resorts 4,300,000 4,300,000 Transfer from funtl balance ~ 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total Financing 64,772,866 - 64,522,0% 249,102 1,758 - Capital Protect Costs .64,772,866 768,786 2,199,134. 39,931,916 21,287,171 573,915 - Financing Over (Under) Project Cosh 0 ~ (7%,788) 62.322,674 (39.682,816) (21,279.355) (573,915) OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE _ Revenue from Taxes and Interest Sales Tax 1 703 864 1 828 234 700 1 805 828 1 900 ~ 1 844,800 7,894,700 1,944,500 1,977,400 2,010,300 2,043,200 2,084,100 2,125,800 2,168,300 2,211,700 2,255,900 2,301,000 Public ACCOmotlations Tax , , 1 573 289 , , 7 730 378 , , 1 733 500 , , 1 755 600 , 771 100 7 1,818,900 1,866,800 1,898,400 1,929,900 1,%7,500 2,000,700 2,040,700 2,081,500 2,123,100 2,185,600 2,208.900 Additional Public ACCOmodaOOns Tas• , , 1.500% , , , , , , 1,755,800 , , 1,771.100 1,818,800 1,866,800 1,898,400 1,929,900 1,961,500 2,000.700 2,040,700 2,081.500 2,123,100 2,165,600 - 2.208,900 Penalties and Interest on Delinquent Taxes Total Conference Center Taxes 4,5% 751 3 281 8,458 3 567 070 3 539 200 5 340 500 387,000 5 5,532,500 5,678,100 5,774,200 5,870,100 5,%6,200 6,085,500 8,207,200 6,331,300 6,457,900 6,587,100 6,718,800 0 Interest on Fund Balance , , 18,824 , , 67,603 , , 118,000 , , 155,000 , 167,000 173,000 187,000 192,000 205.000 220,000 236,000 321 500 6 253,000 460 200 6 270,000 601 300 6 269.000 900 6 746 309.000 896,100 6 329,00 7,047,800 Total Revenue 3,300,575 3,634,673 3,655,200 ~ 5,495,500 5,554,000 5,705,500 5,859,100 5,%6.200 6,075,100 6,186,200 , , , , , , , , , Operetlng Expendlturas Conference Center Operotbns per HVS 375 000 1,125,000 1,285,483 7,135,053 7,045,980 1.006,104 984,645 1,014,200 1,D44,600 1,075,900 1,708,200 1,741,400 1,175,600 000 00 Transfer to Capital Maintenance Fund , 40,000 70,000 80.000 100,000 735,000 220,000 250.000 275,000 85 300,000 895 322 350,000 329 355 4 , 940 335 Town of Vail Management Fee 5.0% 169,599 180,394 178,960 287,025 269,350 270,625 283,905 288,710 293,505 2%,310 304,275 310,360 318,5 , , , Professional an0 Design Fees / Mtg expense 104,438 2,fi% 49271 3,000 ~ 3,000 - 1 602 108 - 958 1 488 890 1 414 609 1 399 417 955 1 1,538,475 1,604,960 1,667,465 1,731,095 1,820,755 1.971.540 Total Operetlng Expenditures 274,037 183,090 226.231 845,025 1.397.350 , , , , , , , , , , Debt Service 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707.221 3,707,221 .3,707,221 3,707,221 3.707,221 3,707,221 Total Expandituree for Operatlons and Debt Service 274,037 183.090 226,231 4,352,248 5,104,571 5,309,329 5,1%179 5,121,911 5,108,830 5,725,178 5,245,6% 5,312,181 5,374,688 5,438,316 5,527,978 5,678,761 Revenue Over (Under) Operafing Expenditures And OaDI Servlu 3,028,538 3,451,583 3,428,%9 1,143,254 449,429 3%,171 662,921 844.289 %8,270 1,061,024 1,075,604 ~ 1,148,019 1.226,674 1,308,584 1,368,124 1,429,039 Revenue Ovar (Under) Expenditures Including ProJact 38 53 928 20 829 744) (177 662 921 844 289 968,270 1,081,024 1,075,804 7.148,079 1,228,814 1,308.584 1.388,124 1,429.039 Costs and FlnanUng 3,026,538 2,664,795 65,751,843 , ( 9,562) ) , , ( , , , Beglnning Fund BalanrA 3.026,538 5.691,333 68,443,176 29,903,814 9.073.688 8,895,944 9,558.885 10.403,154 11,371,424 12,432,446 13,506,252 14,656,277 15,882,685 17,791,469 18,559,593 Transfer to Protect Fund Endin Fund Balance 3 026 538 691 333 5 3,000,000 176 68 443 29 903 614 073,688 9 8,895,944 9,558,865 70,403,154 17,371,424 12,432,4411 13.508,252 14,656,271 15,882.885 17,191.469 18.559.593 79,988,632 g , , , , , , , , , Analysts of Ending Fund Balance Cash Available for Operatlons 3,026,536 5,891,333 6,907,090 8,050,344 8,499,773 8,895,944 9,558,885 10,403,154 11,371,424 72,432,448 73,506,252 14,656,271 15,882,885 17,191,469 18,559,593 19,988,632 Reserved for Capital ProJed Total Ending Fund Baance 3,026,538 5,697,333 67,538,066 68,443,178 27,853,270 29.903,614 573,915 9,073,688 8,895,944 9,558,865 10,403,154 11,371,424 12,432,448 13,508,252 14,656,271 15,882,885 17,191,469 18,559,593 19.988.632 Assumptlons: Sales and Latlging Tax Projections per Bernstein and Associates through 2012; inflated 2% th ereafter - $4.3 million mnbibution from Vail R esorts for parking received December 2005 - Debt service per Piper Jaffrey 08/31/05 Operatlrg bsses per HVS Capital maintenance fund inUUtled in cash flow per HVS Pre-opera0ng marketing costs of $1.5 million inUutletl In cash flow; not reimburse0 from bontl proceeds Town of Vail management fee of 5 % induded s! 050908 Town Council 1.5% Tax 9/1105 TOWN OF VAIL REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -1.5°6 NEW TAX 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2021 2025 2029 2027 2028 2029 2030 2071 2032 2033 ~ 2034 2035 Project Cosh and Flnancing Bond Proceeds Costs of Issuance ~ Interest on Investment of Bond Proceeds Net Cash Proceeds from Bonds Vail Resorts Transfer hom fund balance Total Flnancing Capital Project Costs ~ ' Financing Ovar (Under) Projad Coats OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE Revenue from Texas and Interest Sales Taz 2,347,000 2,393,900 ~ 2,441,800 2,490,600 2,540,400 2,591,200 2,643,000 2,695,800 2,749,800 1 2,804,800 900 2 692 ' 2,860,900 746 800 2 2,918,100 700 801 2 2,97fi,500 2 857 700 3,038,000 914 900 2 3,0%,700 2.973 200 3,158,800 3,032,700 3,221,600 3,093,400 Public AccomodaBons Tax 2,253,100 2,2%,200 2,344,200 2,391,100 2,438,900 2,487,700 2,537,500 500 2 537 2,588,300 588 300 2 2,640, 00 100 2 840 , , 900 2 692 , , 748 800 2 , , 801,700 2 , , 2.657,700 , , 2.914,900 , . 2,973,200 3,032,700 3,093,400 Addi8onal Public ACwmodations Tas 2,253,100 2,2%,200 2,344,200 2,391,100 2,438,900 2,487,700 , , , , , . , , , , , Penalties and tnterest on Delinquent Taxes Total Conference Center Taxes 6,853,200 8,990,300 7,130,200 7,272,800 7,418,200 7,566,800 7,778,000 7,872,500 8,030,000 8,190,600 8,354,500 8,521.500 B.fi91,900 8,865,800 804 000 9,043,100 654 000 9,224,000 907 000 9,408,600 000 962 Interest on fund Balance 351,000 375,000 400 000 426,000 455,000 485.000 578,000 236 000 552,000 424 500 8 589,000 619 000 8 828.000 818 600 8 668,000 500 9 022 711,000 232,500 9 757,000 9,448,900 , 9.669,800 , 9,897,100 , 10,131,000 , 10,370.600 Total Revenue 7,204,200 7,365.300 7,530,200 7,6%,800 7,873,200 8,051,600 , 8, , , , , , , , , , , Operating Expenditures Conference Center Operatbns per HVS 1,210,900 1,247,200 1,2114,fi00 1,323,100 1,362,800 1,403,700 1,445,800 1,489,200 1,533,900 1,579,900 1,627,300 1,678,100 1,726,400 440 000 1,778,200 440 000 1,631,500 440 000 1,886,400 440 000 1,943,000. 000 440 Trensfer to Capital Maintenance FurW _ 415,000 420,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 393 625 435,000 500 401 435,000 409 530 440,000 417 725 440,000 075 428 , 434,595 , 443,290 , 452,155 , 461,200 , 470,430 Town of Va0 Management Fee 342,860 349,Si5 356,510 363.840 370,910 378,330 385.900 , , , , , Professional antl Design Fees I Mtg expense ToW Operetlng Expenditures ~ 1,968,560 2,018,715 2,076,110 2,121,740 2,168,710 2,217,030 2,266,700 2,317,825 2,370,400 2,424,430 2,485,025 2,542,175 2,600,995 2,661,490 2.723,fi55 2,787,600 2,853,430 Debt Servlee ~ 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707.221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 Total Expenditures for Operations and DeM 5.875,781 5,723,936 5,783,331 5,828,%1 5,875,931 5,924,251 5,973,921 6,025.046 8,077,821 8,131,651 6,192,240 6,249,3% 8,308,218 6,388,711 6,430,878 6,494,821 6560,851 Revenue Over (Under( Operatlng Expendltui Servlw 1,528,419 1,641,364 1,746,869 1,869,839 1,997,269 2,127,349 2,262;079 2,399,454 2,541,379 2,686,949 2,830,254 2,983,104 3,140,884 3,301,089 3,466,224 ~ 3,638,179 3,809,949 Revenue Mer (Under) Eupendilurea Includ4 Costs and Finandng ~ 1,528,419 1,841,364 1,746,8fi9 1,%9,839 1,997.289 2,127,349, 2,262,079 2,399,454 2.541,379 2,888,949 2,830,254 2,983,104 3.140,684 3,301,089 3.466,224 3,638,179 3.809.949 Beginning Fund Balanu 19,988,632 21,517,051 23,158,415 24,905,284 28,775,123 28,772,392 30,899,741 33,181,820 35,Sfii,274 38,102.853 40,789,602 43,619,656 48,602,960 49,743,644 53,044,733 58.510,957 60,147,136 Transfer to Project Fund Ending Fund Balance 21,517,051 23,158,415 24,905,284 26,775,123 28,772,392 30.699,741 33,181,820 35,561,274 38,102,653 40,789,602 43,619,856 46,602,960 49.743,844 53,044,733 56,510,957 80,147,138 fi3,957,085 Analysis of Ending Fund Balance Gash Available for OperaBons 21,517,051 23,t58,d15 24,905,284 28,775,123 28,772,392 30,899,741 33,181,820 35,561,274 38,702,653 40,789,602 43,619,858 48,602,960 49.743,644 53,044,733 58,510,957 60,147,136 63,957,085 Reserved to Capital Project Total Ending Fund Balanu 21,517,051 23,158,475 24,905,284 28,775,123 28,772,392 30.899,741 33,181,820 35,561,274 38,102,653 40,789,602 43,619,856 48,602,%0 49,743,644 53,044.733 56,510,957 60,147,138 fi3,957 085 050906 Town CounrA 1.5% Tax 9!1/05 DRAFT TOWN.OF VAIL REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -NEW TAX FOR DEBT SERVICE ONLY Project Costa and Flnancing Bond Proceeds Costs of Issuance Interest on InvesMent of Bond Proceeds Net Cash Proceeds from Bonds Vail Resorts Transfer from fun0 balance Total Financing Capital Project Coate ' Flnancing Over (Under) Project Coco 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 21)28 2027 2020 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2W4 2075 OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE _ - Ravenus from Taxes and fntaraat Sales Tax 900 2 393 2 441 800 800 490 2 540 400 2 2,591,200 2,643,000 2,695,900 ~ 2,749,800 2,804,800 2,680,900 2,918,100 2,978,500 3,038,000 3,096,700 3,158,800 3,221,800 Public AccomodaOOns Tax , , 2 298 200 , , 344 200 2 , , 391 100 2 , , 2,438,900 2,487,700 2,537,500 2,588,300 2,840,100 2,692,900 2,746,800 2.801,700 2.857,700 2,914,900 2,973,200 3,032,700 3,093,400 Additional Public ACCOmafaBOns Tas , , 1,205,800 , , 1,229,900 , , 1,254,500 1,279,fi00 1,305,200 1,331,300 1,358,000 1,3!15,200 1,412,900 1,441,200 1,470,000 1,499,300 1,529,400 1,559,900 1,591,200 1,823,000 PenalBes and Interest on Delinquent Taxes Total Conference Center Taxea 5,897,900 8,015,900 8,136,200 8,258,900 8,3&1,100 8,511,800 6,642,200 8,775,100 6,910.600 7,048,900 7,189,800 7,333,500 7,480,300 7,fi29,800 7,782,500 000 368 7,938,200 000 395 Interest on Fund Balance 159,000 166,000 173.000 IB2,000 191,000 203.000 215,000 229,000 244,000 261,000 279,000 4 800 299,000 7 832 500 321,000 7 807 300 344.000 7 973 800 , 150 500 8 , 333 200 8 Total Revenue 6,058,900 8,181,900 8,709,200 6,440.900 8,575,100 6,714,800 8,857,200 7,004,100 7,154,600 7,309,900 7, 68, , . , , , , , , , , OperaOng Expenditures Conference Center Operations per HVS 1,247,200 1,284,600 1,323,100 1,382,800 1,403,700 1,445,800 1,489,200 1,533,900 1,579,900 1,627,300 1,678,100 1,72fi,400 1,718,200 1,831,500 40 000 1,886,400 440 000 1,943,000 440 000 Transfer fo Capital Maintenance FuM 420,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 440,000 352 445 440,000 490 359 440,000. 386 675 440,000 374 015 , 4 490 381 , 389,125 , 396,910 Town of Vail Management Fee 294.895 300,795 306,810 312,945 319,205 325,590 332,110 338,755 345,530 , , , , , Professional and Design Fees I Mfg expense Total OparaOng Expenditures . 1,962,095 2,020,395 2,064,910 2,110,745 2,157,905 2.208,390 2,258,310 2,307,655 2,360,430 2,419,745 2.475,590 2,533,075 2,592,215 2,852,990 2,715,525 2,779.910 Debt Sarvlce 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 .3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707.221 3.707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 Total Expenditures for OperaOOns and Oabl 5,669,316 5,727,816 5,772,131 5,817,968 5,865.128 5,913,611 5,983,531 8,014,876 6,067,851 6,126,968 8.182,811 8,240,298 6,299,436 6,360,211 6,422,746 fi,4B7,131 Revenue Ovar (Under) OparaBng Expendihu Sarvlce 387,584 454,284 537,069. 622,934 709,974 801,189 893,869 ~ 989,224 1,086,949 1,182,934 1,285,989 1,392,204 1,501,864 1,613,569 1,727,754 1,84fi,069 Revenue War (Under) Expenditurea Includb Costs and Financng 387,584 454.284 537,089 822,934 709,974 801,189 893,669 989,224 1,086.949 1,182,934 1,285,989 1,392,204 1,501,884 1,613,589 1,727,754 1,848,069 8eginning Fund Balancs 7,594,981 7,982,565 .8,436,849 8,973,918 9,598,852 10,308.828 11,108,015 12,OOt,fi84 12,990,906 14,077,857 15,260,791 18,546,780 17,938,984 19,440,648 21,054,437 22,782,191 Transfer to Project Fund Entling Fund Balanw 7,982,5fi5 8,436,849 8,973,918 9,598,852 10,306,826 11,108,015 12,001,684 12,990.908 14,077,857 15,260,791 18,S4fi,780 17,938,984 19,440,848 21,054.437 22,782,191 24,628,260 Analysts of Ending Fund Batanw Cash Available for Operatons 7,982,565 8.438,849 8,973,918 9,596,852 10,306,828 11,108,015 12,001,684 12,990,908 14,077,657 15,280,791 18,548,780 17,938,984 19,440,848 21,054,437 ,22.782,191 24,628,260 Reserved for Capital Project Total Ending Fund Balance 7,982,565 6,436,849 8,973,918 9,596,852 10,308,828 11,108,015 12,001.684 12,990,908 14,077,857 15,260,791 16,546,780 17,938,984 19,440,848 21,054,437 22,782,191 24,628,260 ,~ 050906 Town Council ~ 050906 Counr~l ~ 9/7/05 DRAFT TOWN OF VAIL REVENUE. EXPENDITURES, AND C47ANGES tN FUND BALANCE CONFERENCE CENTER FUND -NEW TAX FOR DEBT SERVICE ONLY 2003 2004 Zoos 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ~ 2014 2015 ~ 2018 2017 2018 2079 Actual Actual Projaceon 20 8 Project Cosb and Flnancing ~ Total Pro ed ~ ~ ' Bond Proceeds 57,700.000 57,700.000 Costs of Issuance (1,644,631) (1,644,631) 639 166 1 249,102 1;758 . Interest on Investment of BorW Proceeds 1,417,497 , , 008 57 222 249,102 1,756 - Net Cash Proceeds from Bands VailResods 57,472,866 4.3~.~ , , 4•~•~ Tr fund bal nce f f D00 000 3 3,000,000 - ~~ ans er rom a , , - 008 64 522 249 102 1,756 - Total Flnandng CapitalProjactCosts fi4,772,866 84,772,868 788,788 , , 2,199,134 , 39,931,918 21,281,111 573,915 Flnancing Over (Under) ProJact Costs 0 (786 788) 82 322 874 (39,682,818) (21,279.355) (573,915) - OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE Revenue from Taxes and Interest Sales Tax ~ 7,703,864 1,828,234 1,805,700 1,828,900 1,844,800 1,894,700 1,944,500 1,977,400 2,010,300 2,043,200 1 981 500 2,084,100 700 2 000 2,125,800 700 2 040 2,188,300 2 081 500 2,211.700 123,100 2 2,255,900 2,185,600 2,301,000 2,208,900 2,347,000 2,253,100 Public ACCOmodations Tax 1,573,289 1,730,378 1,733,500 1,755,800 1,771,100 1,878,900 1,868,800 7 400 1,898,400 000 998 1,929,900 800 1 012 , , 100 7 029 , , 700 1 049 , , 1,070,7011 , , 1,092,100 , 1,113,900 1,138,200 1,158,900 9,782,100 Additbnal Public Accomodaoons Tae 0.79% 921,200 929.200 954,300 9, 9 . , . , , , , PenalBes and Interest on Delinquent Taxes 4,598 8,458 587 070 3 1 757 200 539 3 4 505 900 4,545.100 4,667,900 4,790,700 4,871,800. 4,952,800 5,033,800 5,134,500 5,237,200 5,341,900 5,448,700 5,557,700 147 000 5,668,8D0 150 000 5,782,200 154 000 Total Conference Canter Taxes Interest on Fund BeWnce - , , , . 3,28 18,824 87,603 , , 118,000 , , 149,000 149,000 143,000 138,000 135.000 135,000 800 136,000 169 800 5 137,000 271 500 5 139,000 200 37fi 5 141,000 482 900 5 143.000 5,591.700 , 5,704,700 , 5,818,800 , 5,938,200 Total Revenue 3,300,575 3,634,873 3,655,200 4,654,900 4,694,100 4,810,900 4,928,700 5,006,800 5,087, , , , , , , , , Oparatlrig Expenditures 000 375 1,125,000 1,285,183 1,135,053 1,045,980 1,008,104 984,645 1,014,200 1,044.600 1,075,900 1,108,200 000 1,141,400 350 000 1,175,600 400 000 ~ 1,210,900 415 000 Conference Center Operations per HVS , 40 W0 70,000 80,000 100,000- 135,000 220,000 250,000 275,000 300, , , , 289 110 Transfer b Capital Maintenance Fund 394 599 180 169 98D 178 295 225 227,255 , 233,395 239,535 243,590 247,640 251,690 258,725 281,860 287,095 272.435 277,885 283,440 , Town of Vail Management Fee Professional and Design Fees I Mtg expense , , 5.0% 104,438 2 698 , 49,271 31 , 3,0110 603 295 3000 255 355 1 1 558 878 1,444,588 1,369,570 1,353,744 1,371,335 1,490,925 1,556,460 5,617,995 7,880,835 1,789,285 1,859,040 1,915,O1D Total OperaBng Expenditures 274,037 183,090 226,2 , , , , , ~ ~ 707 221 3 3,707 221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,227. 3,707,221 3,707,221 3.707,221. 3,7D7,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 3,707,221 Debt Service 1 3 090 237 228 , , 578 4 310 478 5 082 5,266,099 5,151,809 5,078,791 5,080,965 5,078,558 5,198,146 5,283,881 5,325,218 5,387,858 V 5,478,50fi 5,568,261 5,622,231 Total Expenditures for OperaBons and Da , 8 bt Serviee 274,037 , , , , , Revenue Over (Under) Operatlng Expenditures And Dabt 9 344 384 376) (388 (455 199) (223.109) (89.991) 26,835 91,244 73.354 112,519 157,884 203,844 228,194 152,539 313,969 Sarviw 3,028,538 3,451,583 3,428,98 , , , Revenue Ovar (Under) Ezpendltuns Including Projeet - 3 432) 39 338 731) (21 847 (1 029 114) (223.109) (89,991) 28,835 91,244 73,354 112,579 757,884 203.844 228,194 252,539 313,969 CosisandFlnandng 3,026,538 2,664,795 65,757,84 , , ( , , , , 026 538 - - 3 333 691 5 68,443,176 29,104,744 7,457,013 6,427,899 8,204,790 8,134,799 8,181,634 6,252,878 8,328,232 8,438,751 8,598,435 8,800,279 7,028,173 7,281,012 Beginning Fund Balance Transfer to Project Fund , , 691 333 5 , , 3.000,OW 176 68 443 104 744 29 013 7 457 8427,899 6,204,790 8,134,799 6,181,634 6,252,878 6,328,232 fi,438,757 6,596,435 fi,800.279 7,028,473 7,261,012 7,594,981 Ending Fund Balance , . 3,026,538 , , . , , , Malyais of Ending Fund Balance 691 333 ' 5 090 8 907 251 474 7 098 8 883 8,427,899 8,204.790 6,134,799 6,181,834 8,252.878 8,328,232 fi,438,751 6,598,435 8,800,279 7,028,473 7,281,012 Cash Available la Operations Reserved for Capital Project , , 3,026,538 , , 81,536,086 , , 21,853,270 , , 573,915 427 899 6 790 204 8 734 799 8 181 634 6 8,252,878 6,326,232 6,438,751 6,596.435 6,800,279 7,028,473 7,281,012 7,594,981 Total Ending Fund Balance 3,026,538 5,691,333 88,443,176 29,104,744 7,457,013 , , , , , , , , Asaump0ans: Sales and Lodging Tax ProiacUons per Bernstein and Assodates Through 2012; inflated 2% therea8er 54.3 million wntribution (ran Va0 Resorts for parking received December 2005 Debt service per Piper JaBray 08131ro5 - _ OpemBrg bsses per HVS - Capital maintenance hmd induded b cash lbw per HVS Pre-operating marketkg costs of 51.5 millon induded in rash flaw: cwt reimbursed from bond Droceeds Town of Va8 management lee d 5Y. included 050908 Town Courx:0 o5osoe Courxil snros f Attachment D Resolution 16, Series of 2005: Ballot Language RESOLUTION NO. 16 SERIES 2005 A RESOLUTION SUBMITTING TO THE REGISTERED ELECTORS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AT A REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8; 2005, A BALLOT ISSUE CONCERNING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS AND AN INCREASE IN TAXES TO FINANCE A CONFERENCE CENTER; AND PROVIDING OTHER DETAILS RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado (the "Town"), is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under laws of the State of Colorado (the "State") and the Town Charter (the "Charter"}; and WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council")have been duly elected acid qualified; and WHEREAS, the Council hereby fords and determines that it is in the public interest to finance the construction of a conference center in the Town and that it is necessary to increase taxes and issue bonds for such purpose; and WHEREAS, Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, also referred to as the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights ("TABOR"), requires voter approval for any new tax, any increase in any tax rate, the creation of any debt, and the spending of certain funds above limits established by TABOR; and WHEREAS, TABOR requires the Town to submit ballot issues (as defined in TABOR) to the Town's electors on limited election days before action can be taken on such ballot issues; and WHEREAS, the Town will hold its regular municipal election on November 8, 2005 (the "Election"); and WHEREAS, November 8, 2005, is one of the election dates at which ballot issues maybe submitted to the Town's electors pursuant to TABOR; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Charter, the .Council hereby determines that the Election shall be held and conducted as a polling place election in accordance with Article 10 of Title 31, Colorado Revised Statutes ("C.R.S.") (the "Municipal Election Code"); and . WHEREAS, the Council is of the opinion that the Town should seek voter approval to increase taxes and increase debt for the purpose provided in this resolution; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to set forth certain procedures concerning the conduct of the Election. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: Section 1. Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used herein shall have the meanings defined in TABOR and in Section 31-10-102, C.R.S. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 31-10-105, C.R.S. and Section 2.5 ofthe Charter, the Election Commission of the Town shall perform all acts required or permitted by law in connection with the Election, which Election shall beheld and conducted as an independent polling place election. . Section 3. Pursuant to the applicable laws of the State and the Charter, the Council hereby determines that the following ballot issue is hereby referred to the registered electors of the Town and shall appear on the ballot of the Town of Vail, Colorado, at the Election: SHALL TOWN OF VAIL DEBT BE INCREASED $7,640,000 WITH A REPAYMENT COST OF $16,685,040 AND SHALL TOWN TAXES BE INCREASED $1,950,000 ANNUALLY IN THE FIRST FULL YEAR OF COLLECTION AND BY WHATEVER ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS AS ARE RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER FROM THE LEVY OF AN ADDITIONAI, LODGING TAX OF NOT MORE THAN 1.5% (WHICH WILL RESULT IN A TOTAL LODGING TAX IMPOSED BY THE TOWN OF NOT MORE THAN 3.0%) TO FINANCE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A CONFERENCE CENTER SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIlVIITS OR CONDITIONS: • IF THIS QUESTION IS APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE DEBT PURSUANT TO THIS QUESTION TOGETHER WITH THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE DEBT PURSUANT TO QUESTION 2B APPROVED BY THE VOTERS ON NOVEMBER 5, 2002 WILL TOTAL $57,700,000 WITH A REPAYMENT COST OF $112,295,000; AND • IF THIS QUESTION IS APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, THE SUNSET FOR THE LODGING TAX AND SALES TAX LEVIED PURSUANT TO 2002 QUESTION 2B IS REPEALED AND SUCH TAXES AND THE LODGING TAX LEVIED PURSUANT TO THIS QUESTION SHALL NOT TERMINATE UNTIL TERMINATED BY LEGISLATIVE ACTION BY THE TOWN; AND 2 IF THIS QUESTION IS NOT APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE DEBT PURSUANT TO 2002 QUESTION 2B SHALL TERMINATE IlVIl~~1EDIATELY AND THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY TAXES PURSUANT TO 2002 QUESTION 2B SHALL TERMINATE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2006, AND THE TOWN COUNCIL SHALL EITHER REFUND ANY REMAINING REVENUES FROM- SUCH TAXES PURSUANT TO SUCH REFUND METHODOLOGY AS THE TOWN COUNCIL DETERMINES OR SUBMIT A QUESTION TO THE VOTERS ON HOW SUCH REVENUES SHALL BE USED; AND • THE LODGING TAX AND SALES TAX LEVIED PURSUANT TO 2002 QUESTION 2B AND THE LODGING TAX LEVIED PURSUANT TO THIS QUESTION ARE CURRENTLY ANTICIPATED TO BE SUFFICIENT TO PAY DEBT SERVICE • ON THE BONDS AND APPROXIMATELY $1,500,000 OF THE COSTS OF ANNUALLY OPERATING AND MAINTAINING THE CONFERENCE CENTER; AND • IN ORDER TO FINANCE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE CONFERENCE CENTER, THE TOWN COUNCIL MAY LEVY, INCREASE OR DECREASE THE LODGING TAX APPROVED BY THIS QUESTION FROM TIME TO TIME SO LONG AS IT DOES NOT EXCEED THE RATE OF 1.5%; AND • SUCH. LODGING TAX SHALL BE LEVIED ON THE PRICE PAID FOR THE RENTING OR LEASING OF LODGING FOR LESS THAN THIRTY CONSECUTIVE DAYS; AND • SUCH DEBT SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS PAYABLE FROM THE LODGING TAX AUTHORIZED BY THIS QUESTION AND THE LODGING TAX AND SALES TAX AUTHORIZED IN 2002 QUESTION 2B; SUCH BONDS TO BE SOLD IN ONE OR MORE SERIES ON TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND WITH SUCH MATURITIES AS PERMITTED BY LAW AND AS THE TOWN COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE, INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR REDEMPTION OF THE BONDS PRIOR TO MATURITY WITH OR WITHOUT PAYMENT OF A PREMIUM OF NOT MORE THAN THREE PERCENT OF THE AMOUNT SO REDEEMED; AND 3 THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH DEBT AND TAXES AND ANY EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH PROCEEDS AND REVENUES BE COLLECTED AND SPENT AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? Section 4. If a majority of the votes cast on the question to authorize the bonds and the levy of taxes submitted at the Election shall be in favor of issuance of the bonds and the levy of taxes as provided in such question, the Town, acting through the Council, shall be authorized to proceed with the necessary action to issue the bonds and levy the taxes in accordance with such question. Any authority to issue the bonds and levy the taxes, if conferred by the results of the Election, shall be deemed and considered a continuing authority to issue the bonds and levy the taxes so authorized at any one time, or from time to time, and neither the partial exercise of the authority so conferred, nor any lapse of time, shall be considered as exhausting or limiting the full authority so conferred. Section 5. The officers and employees of the Town are.hereby authorized and directed to take all action necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this resolution. Section 6. All actions heretofore taken (not inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution) by the Town and the officers thereof, directed towards the Election and the objects and purposes herein stated are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 7. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this resolution shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall in no manner affect any remaining provisions of this resolution, the intent being that the same are severable. Section 8. All resolutions or parts of resolutions inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revive any resolution or part of any resolution heretofore repealed. 4 INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this September 6, 2005. Rod Slifer; Mayor (SEAL) ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk 5 STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF EAGLE )SS. TOWN OF VAIL ) I, the Town Clerk of the Town of Vail, Colorado, do hereby certify that: 1. The foregoing pages are a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution (the "Resolution")passed and adopted by the Town Council (the "Council") constituting the governing board of the Town of Vail, Colorado (the "Town"), at a regular meeting of the Town held at the Town Hall on September 6, 2005, convening at the hour of 6:00 p.m. as recorded in the regular book of official records of the proceedings of said Town of Vail kept in my office. 2. The Resolution was duly moved and seconded and the Resolution was adopted at the meeting of September 6, 2005, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Council as follows: Name "Yes" "No" Absent Abstain Rod Slifer Dick Cleveland Diana Donovan Kim Ruotolo Kent Logan Greg Moffet Farrow Hitt 6 J 3. .The members of the Council were present at such meeting and voted on the passage of such Resolution asset forth above. 4. The Resolution was approved and authenticated by the signature of the Mayor, sealed with the Town seal, attested by the Town. Clerk and recorded in the minutes of the Council. 5. There are no bylaws, rules or regulations of the Council which might prohibit the adoption of said Resolution: 6. The notice of the meeting of September 6, 2005, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, was posted at the Town Hall, not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting in accordance with law. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Town affixed this September 6, 2005. Town .Clerk (SEAL) 7 EXHIBIT A (Attach Form of Meeting Notice) pubfin\179926_1.dac Attachment E Resolution 17, Series of 2005: Trigger threshold for Lodging Tax RESOLUTION N0.17 SERIES 2005 A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE INTENTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LODGING TAX WHICH IS BEING SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORS OF THE TOWN AT A REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2005 AND WITH RESPECT TO OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE CONFERENCE CENTER. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado (the "Town"), is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under laws of the State of Colorado (the "State") and the Town Charter (the "Charter"); and WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council")have been duly elected and qualified; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined to submit a ballot issue to the electors of the Town on November 8, 2005, which authorizes a lodging tax increase to provide a portion of the revenues to finance, operate and maintain a conference center in the Town; and WHEREAS, the ballot issue will permit the Council to levy, increase or decrease a lodging tax from time to time so long as it does not exceed the rate of 1.5%; and WHEREAS, the Council wishes to express its present intention as to (1) when the tax will be levied, increased or decreased and (2) that no revenues of the Town will be used to support the conference center other than the lodging tax being submitted at the November 8, 2005 election, the lodging tax and sales tax levied pursuant to Question 2B (approved at the 2002 election), and the revenues derived from the operation of the conference center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: Section 1. If the electors of the Town approve the ballot issue being submitted at the election on November 8, 2005, the Council presently intends to levy, increase or decrease the lodging tax approved at such election for the purpose of fmancing, 'operating and maintaining the conference center up to the maximum rate of 1.5%. Of the maximum rate of 1.5%, it is currently expected that the Council will need to levy a lodging tax to take effect on a yet to be determined date during 2006 at a rate of .79% in order to secure the payment of the bonds to be issued to finance the conference center. The actual rate to be used to secure the payment of the bonds and the date it will take effect will be determined when the bonds are marketed and be based upon the requirements of credit rating agencies and the bond insurer, if any. When the cash reserves available to the Town and derived from the lodging tax approved at such election and the lodging tax and sales tax levied pursuant to Question 2B (approved at the 2002 election) exceeds $5,000,000, the rate of the tax shall be decreased to only the rate required to be levied by any covenants made to the holders of the bonds issued to finance the conference center. The rate of the tax may be increased up to the maximum rate of 1.5% by the Council without further voter approval when such reserves are less than $5,000,000. In no event shall the rate of tax be decreased below the level required to be levied in any covenants made to the holders of the bonds issued to finance the conference center. For purposes of this resolution, cash reserves do not include any debt service reserves required to be maintained by covenants made to the holders of the bonds issued to finance the conference center. The amount of cash reserves shall be determined by the Finance Director as of the first business day in July of each year beginning July of 2008. It is intended that any adjustment of the tax rate shall occur on the next January 1. ' Section 2. The Council intends that the costs of financing, operating and maintaining the conference center will be paid solely from the lodging tax being submitted at the November 8, 2005 election, the lodging tax and sales tax levied pursuant to Question 2B (approved at the 2002 election), and the revenues derived from the operation of the conference center and that no other Town revenues will be used for such purposes. Section 3. This resolution may be amended or repealed by the Council at any time.. Section 4. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this resolution shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall in no manner affect any remaining provisions of this resolution, the intent being that the same are severable. Section 5. All resolutions or parts of resolutions inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revive any resolution or part of any resolution heretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this September b, 2005. 2 ~~ (SEAL) ATTEST: Rod Slifer, Mayor Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Attachment F Parking Analysis from FHU earl ~~n~~~°~~~e C~n~~r Jaul~y ~S, S FELSBURG Ci HOLT & ULLEVIG ,~ FELSBURG ~i HOLT ULLEVIG mmary _ __ _ , Parkin Su ~ I ~..~ 9 : Pp Y .. .~.; Demand Parking Available i ~ . ~ Conf: Other,,: Total_ Season/Time of Day Leal Attendance. .Needs From.LH Center` Increase:. Avail ,, w ...~~~. ~. .~. Ski Season Day_Light Hours Avera a 360 55 .. 0 125 s 0 125 ;Design ; 700 95 0 125 0 125 _..., . ,~. v ....... _ .n ._ _ .~... ... _- -. -- ._ .... Extreme ~ . , ._ ...~_.., ....,_, _u 1250 ...._~ ~ w r .. 180 _........ N._ . . .~ Y 0 . _ _ .Me. X125 _ ._ .._... w _~~_._ .. _. ~ 0 ._ ~..._ _...~ __~.. ~ ... 125 F Evening Hours } Average 550 205 i 600-700 125 ; 125. 850-950 Design 700. 245 600 700 125 ~ 125 850 950 ~` ....... _.a_y_.~... s,. ..:__z ~.:,..._ w.....~..~.r _:...._ .. r~....~..,n._._~_. ~ . , ....~ Extreme 3650 G i ~.,.r...n ~, ,_~m..= 1120 .._ ,.~,.,W ~Y. 600 700 ~a ~ ~~ _ ..... ~ .n.,__W, 125 ~_... ~., ,,.. 125 _., .. .~_ , ..~.__ ...~, . u__ 850 950 , _ _ ~.. Summer Season Day Light Hours Average ....__ ..__ ..._... ~~, ..__.~ ._.. .._ .__~ ....~. . . , 565 ~ ., ~ _ n ...,.m._.a .. ~,.-- 130 ....._....., m _. 600-700 .~_ _..r... _ . 125 .. _ .._..._ . 125 `......,: _~ _....~,.. . 850-950' _~v,. ,__ _. _ ...~ . _ ~. . . Design 900 190 600=700 125 125 _ . 850-950 Extreme ~ _ .... _. 2100 ...,u . ~. _., ~......_ . 405 600-700 ' 125 a 125 850-950 Evening Hours Average 450 .~._ 175 700-800 125 _ 125 950 1050 ,Design 900 450 700-800: 125 :_ _ _ ~ 125 ~~ _ 950-1050. _ _.._..~. ..._~ _.:,~,~,...__,~.. _ . _ __a Extreme _ _ ~.:,.~.~_ .,,__ ,., . 3650 ,__,. , ._: ~.__ _~. 1240 _y... _ _..~ __ E._. 700-800 _.. _ .,__W 125 ...a...~..:_ . _,__ 125 .:_ ~_~.._.~ ,~_~.~~ 950-1050 .,-. .. ,.~ 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Days on Fr. Road FELSBURG Ci HOLT & ULLEVIG FELSBURG ~i HOLT & ULLEVIG _ ''~ ~. FELSBURG CiHOLT 6L ULLEVIG i~ 9~ ~.vs (~S ~~ ~ ~ V A villa e o es its own wa ~ g g y Intelligent use of the enrgy wood obtained in our area ~ _ _ _ ,~ C~ ___ ~ _ .~ ~ ~,~_~i,' . .. . _..., 1 -~.: E ~- •F I .~~~ ~n. i 1/J! • TS ; ~r i~ oor.•' u~iir i L.uc~i on , The two biomass boilers have a capacity of;o MW. Lech in figures Location Lech is L,45om above sea level and together with Zurs stretches across 9o square kilometres in the Austrian state of Vorarlberg. Population Main domicile 1890 371 1951 681 1961 1931 i97i i.zi8 1981 l.z7o i99i 1.234 ~~_ zoos 1.466 The population that permanently lives in Lech - 0.4% of the population in the state - rose by over 80°~; between the 1951 and the 1991 censuses. However the number ofresi- dents is subject to extreme seasonal variations. [fthe sea- sonalemployees and guests are added to those with their main domicile in the village, up to 14,000 people stay in Lech during the main season. Seasonal workers: 3.500 Accommodation A total of6,95z beds are available in Lech. They are divided up as follows: z9o in 5-star hotels z. zoo in 4-star hotels z.4z8 in 3-star hotels 96z in z-and 1-star homes 531 in private accommodation 8 on farms 6z in youth hostels 431 in holiday apartments .~~ _ Kilometres of pistes in Lech /Zurs Lech and Zurs have a unique skiing area. There is a total of 1lo km pistes available, zz of which are for experts, 44 intermediate, and 44 beginners. Three ski schools (Lech, Oberlech and Zurs) with over 500 ski teachers ensure that theirguests have an unforgettable skiing experience. Each year the Lech and Zurs pistes are awarded the Vorarlberg Piste Seat ofQuality for exemplary preparation and safe signage. August zoos - L Arlberg: Throughout the Arlberg region (Lech, Zurs, Stuben, St. Anton and St. Christoph) there are z6o km of prepared pistes available, ofwhich 58 km are for experts, 1 to inter- mediate,and 9z beginners. A11 the lifts in the Arlberg area can be used with a ski pass. One speciality are the many tours in the free skiing area. There are over 18o km which are known and loved by skiers throughout the world. These free skiing areas are mainly used together with ski guides. Lift facilities in Lech /Zurs There are 4 cable cars (Lech-Oberlech mountain lift, Riifibahn I + II and the Trittkopf lift), 18 chair lifts and to drag Lifts. Highest top station: Muggengrat at an altitude ofz,45o m Capacity The ski lifts have a capacity of44,668 people per hour. This means that 13.5 million skiers can be transported in a win- ter season. Cross-country ski runs Lech provides 3 cross countryski runs totalling 19 km. The run into the romanticZug Valley, which is completely free ofvehicles in winter, is particularly popular. Hiking For those that like walking and hiking there are z5 km of signposted and maintained hiking paths available in summer. In winter there are t~n~o prepared mountain hiking paths. Infrastructure In summer 6 public tennis courts, 4 indoor tennis courts and z squash courts, outdoor ice-skating, curling, indoor ice-skating, feeding wild animals, horse sleigh. rides, forest swimming pool with slide, children's pool, clim- bingwall, heated pool, local and hiking bus, guided walks and mountain tours, local museum, open-air concerts, l~ltn 1 f ..- ess trai , orest teaching path, football pitch, library. Restaurants 48 restaurants, from gourmet get-togethers to small snack bars, four self-service restaurants. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Biomass District Heating Plant Lech August zoos - 3 Something had to be done The air pollution in the v-shaped basin of Lech caused by extensive periods ofatmospheric inversion in winter, as well as the need for a general improvement ofthe hea- ting infrastructure of most businesses in Lech were the starting point and motivation for building a central bio- mass heating plant. Partnership Lech -Vorarlberger Kraftwerke AG After the initial start-up of the "Project Lech -ecologic life and economy", where the residents and the project team declared themselves in favour of constructing a biomass heating plant, the town started to look for part- -` n ers that would be able to rea- lice such a project. The muni- cipality of Lech and the Vorarlberger Kraftwerke AG ("Vorarlberg Power Plants") were put in charge of the rea- lisation of the biornass dis- ~~trict heating plant. By bund- _ ~ , _~; ling energy efficiency, regio- r ,: s,~u:,u-~:.1k«~ ~, ,, .~:,~ ~9~9 na1 value added, and sus- tainable environmental tech- nology, they invested in the future. Four million litres ofoil are replaced by biomass Every year, some 65,000 cubic metres of wood shavings and bark are burned that are exclusively sourced from local sawmills and wood processing plants. This means that around four million litres ofoil have been replaced, making a sustainable improvement in the air quality and ensuring that the local economy is strengthened over the long term. There is no other tourism town in Austria (probably not in Europe, either) with as many residents and guest accommodations as Lech that has planned, realised and is operating a biomass heating plant similar to this one. It is a role model in many ways. Use oflocal heating material Along with the intelligent use ofthe energy wood obtai- ned in Vorarlberg, the Lech district biomass heating plant fulfils the important function of being an ambas- sador ofthe preservation of the economic strength in a sensitive mountain and tourism area, of the safeguar- dingand creation ofjobs and ofthe decrease ofthe con- sumption of fossil fuels and hence of COz emissions. Ever since it was put into operation, the biomass district heating plant Lech has become an integral part of the infrastructure of our village. This is confirmed by the too% link-up ratio of buildings that are supplied with district heating. Biomass District Hearing Plant Lech August zoos - 4 Ideal location at the town entry The plant was built in only seven months and is located right outside Lech. This facilitates the delivery and sto- rage of the biomass (bark, wood shavings, chopped wood from industrial and agricultural sources, and logs) and ensures there is enough space between the premises and the residential area. i~.s km of pipes The plant produces hot water from biomass and sup- plies heat to zz3 businesses (mainly hotels and guest houses) through a densely set-up system of t7,5oo m of district heat pipes. The heat transfer stations in the hea- ted objects are remote-controlled and maintained by the headquarters. The current capacity is 3o MW. Mind the designl The renowned architect Hermann Kaufmann placed the building in the shape ofan arch between main road and Zursbach. It is fitted with two biomass boilers, one oil boiler to cover peak loads, one electric filter, and one flue gas condensation unit. The basement holds the pump, the plant's own transformer station, the power stand-by unit, and the expansion device. Subterranean fuel storage There are two fuel storage rooms holding z,5oo cubic metres underneath the forecourt on which the bark is stored. The storage rooms are served by automatic cra- nes, and they are used for mere storage as well as for dry- ingthe chopped wood, which works with the waste heat of the condensation unit. High number ofvisitors on guided tours Both the Lech residents and the guests noticed the improvement ofthe air quality, and the success left both groups sensitised with respect to environmental pro- jects in the region. This is impressively shown by the high number ofvisitors to the heating plant (z,5oo peo- ple have visited the plant since the year zooo). The central control unit of the Lech district biomass heating plant is based on modern computer systems. The two biomass boilers have a capacity of 3o MW and provide district heating to zz3 businesses through a t7.5 km network of pipes. The total ammount ofcosts are > 7 Mio. US Dollar. ~? k •~' ,~ . ~ _ ;._ _ r ~ • • - A f c ~. ~, , ~. G - M he central control unit of the Lech district biomus hearing plant is based on computer systcros The two biomus boilers have a capacity of;o MW and provide district heating to zz; businesses through a t7.g km network of pipes. Biomass District Heating Plant Lech August zoos J S ~-