Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2005-09-20 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 NOON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. ITEM/TOPIC: Executive session, pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(b) - conference with Town Attorney regarding pending and/or threatened litigation (15 min.); and C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(f) -personnel matters (45 min.). (Lunch will be served) 2. Vail Local Marketing District (VLMD) Meeting (20 min.) 3. Warren Campbell ITEM/TOPIC: Mountain Haus Site Visit (15 min.) Russ Forrest ITEM/TOPIC: Request to proceed through the development review process with a proposal to construct private improvements on Town of Vail property. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with modifications, or deny the applicant's request to proceed through the development review process. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: It is the desire of the Mountain Haus to apply for a design review application to construct a new covered entry and alter the landscaping on the west elevation of the existing building within the Town of Vail right-of-way for. Slifer Square. Since the Mountain Haus is proposing to construct and alter Town of Vail property, Town Council permission is required to proceed through the development review process. If Council grants permission to proceed. through the process the applicant will need to proceed forward with their Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board applications. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council give the Mountain Haus and their representative further direction on this matter to proceed through the design review process. 4. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update (30 min.) (Will update on the Ritz under "Information Update.") 5. Greg Hall ITEM/TOPIC: East Meadow Drive Streetscape Improvements. (20 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review and respond to the proposed design recommendations for East Meadow Drive. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Streetscape Design Committee, assisted by Wenk Associates and Kracum Resources, have continued to develop and refine the East Meadow Drive Streetscape Design. Prior to moving forward with final design and construction of the improvements, the streetscape master plan, budget and cost sharing arrangements, and project phasing are presented for review and comment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Comment and provide direction to move towards final design and construction of East Meadow Drive Streetscape Improvements. 6. Judy Camp ITEM/TOPIC: Council Contributions (15 min) Pam Brandmeyer Staff will have prepared a master matrix in time for Tuesday afternoon's discussion on Council Contributions for'06. Please drop off your working papers first thing Tuesday morning, unless you have already done so, so Penny has time to compile them. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Discussion of 2006 contribution requests that have been submitted to staff on July 29, 2005 for 2006 funding. This decision, however, will not be final until the adoption of the 2006 budget in October. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: To be provided in separate memo STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To be provided in separate memo. • Commission on Special Events Update 7. Stan Zemler ITEM/TOPIC: Review of First Draft of Five Year Capital and Judy Camp RETT Budget (30 min) Gina Bentz ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Discussion of staffs' five year projection for Capital Projects Fund and Real Estate Transfer Tax fund as part of the 2006 budget process. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: At the start of each budget process, a five year capital projects and RETT projects projections are presented to council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and/or give direction to staff in regards to the five year projections of the Capital Projects Fund and the RETT Projects Fund. 8. Matt Mire ITEMlTOPIC: Discussion of Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2005, an ordinance submitting a proposed amendment to Section 7.2 of the Town of Vail Home Rule Charter, which would limit the "exclusive jurisdiction" of the Vail Municipal Court (20 min) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Ordinance 21, Series 2005. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: A recently decided Colorado Supreme Court case (Town of Frisco v. Baum, 90 P. 3d 845 (Colo. 2004), appears to have expanded the jurisdiction of the municipal court in certain home rule municipalities that have adopted charter language granting themselves "exclusive and original" jurisdiction. More specifically, the Supreme Court's decision upheld the ruling of the District Court, that it lacked jurisdiction over a C.R.C.P. Rule 106 appeal of a zoning decision and that such cases are the jurisdiction of the municipal court. Since the Town of Vail has also adopted such charter language and since our belief is that the municipal court is NOT the proper venue for these matters, Section 7.2 of the Town of Vail Charter must be amended to limit the jurisdiction of the Town of Vail Municipal Court to handling criminal matters. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance 21, Series 2005. (20 min.) 9. ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update (20 min.) • -West Vail Area Sub Plan • Ritz Update • Information Center Rack Rate Update • Joint Meeting with PEC 10. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor & Council. (20 min.) 11. ITEMlTOPIC: Adjournment. (5 p.m.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT NOON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2005 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING _. ~~ September 12, 2005 Ttlli~' OF VAII. ' PROJECT ORIENTATION -Community Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME .12:00 pm 1. 1. Staff memorandums were discussed with Commission members; no direction given. MEMBERS PRESENT Chas Bernhardt Doug Cahill Bill Jewitt Rollie Kjesbo George Lamb Site Visits: MEMBERS ABSENT Ann Guniori David Viele 1. Boone Residence - 3094 Booth Falls Road 2. Ritz - 728 West Lionshead Circle Driver: Warren Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6F-6, Setbacks, Vail Town- Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition within the setback, located at 3094 Booth Falls Road, Unit 1 (Booth Falls Mountain Homes)/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Michael and Katie Boone Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved, with condition(s) • MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITIONS: 1. This approval shall be contingent upon the applicant, receiving Town of Vail approval for the related design review application. Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the Staff memorandum. There was no public comment or comment from the applicant. •'~ ,,~ 2. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-2, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement or Garden Level, and 12-7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor on Street Level, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of 106 multi-family residential dwelling units, located at 728 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 2, West Day Subdivision,' and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Vail Corp., represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to September 26, 2005 MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 5-0-0 Page 1 Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the Staff memorandum The applicant's representatives, Jay Petersen and Bob Fitzgerald gave a presentation of the project whichincluded a power point presentation. Jeff Winston, the Town's consultant regarding the project, gave a presentation. Gil McNeish, the lawyer representing the Vail Spa, stated that his comments were as stated in his letter dated August 19, 2005. He added that he would have specific comments regarding the project at the following hearing. There was no other public comment. The Commission expressed that there were no concerns with the Conditional Use Permit that was being request for dwelling units on the first floor or garden level. The Commission continued by expressing concern regarding the height of the landmark tower. The general consensus was that a height of 140 feet was inappropriate. In addition, the Commission stated that the height of the screening element for the mechanicals had not been justified in the presentation and other options should be examined. The Commission was not comfortable with approving the height of the screening element over the maximum height of 82.5 feet. Finally the Commission expressed that they would like greater information regarding the flat roof maximum area requirement found in the Lionshead Redevelopment, Master Plan. George Lamb and Chas Bernhardt expressed a need for the western elevation along the Frontage Road to have step backs incorporated. 3. A request for a worksession to discuss a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for proposed text amendments to Title 11, Sign Regulations; Title 12, Zoning Regulations; Title 13, Subdivision Regulations; Title 14, Development Standards Handbook; Vail Town Code, for proposed corrections and clarifications to the Vail Town Code, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Tabled to September 26, 2005 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 5-0-0 4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Vail Town Code; to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, to define the term "Time-Share Units" and to'amend Section 12-6H-3, Conditional Uses, High Density Multiple-Family (HDMF) District; Section 12-7A-3, Conditional Uses, Public Accommodation (PA) District; Section 12-7H- 4, Permitted and Conditional Uses, Second Floor and Above, Lionshead Mixed Use 1 (LMU-1) District; and Section 12-71-2, Permitted and Conditional Uses, Basemenf or Garden Level, and .Section 12-71-3, Permitted and= Conditional Uses, First Floor or Street Level, Lionshead Mixed Use 2 (LMU-2) District, to replace the terms "fractional fee clubs", "fractional fee club units", "timeshare estate units", "fractional fee units", and "timeshare license units" with the term "time- share units", and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: George Ruther .ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0-0 George Ruther gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. There was no public input. Members of the Commission expressed support for text amendment. Page 2 5. A request for a final review of a conditional use .permit, pursuant to Section 12-7B-5, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for the operation of a private club, located at 333 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Remonov & Company, Inc., represented by Knight Planning Services, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell ~ ~ . ACTION: Tabled to September 26, 2005 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 5-0-0 6. A request for a final review of a text amendment to Section 12-7A-7, Height, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-3, Amendments, to increase the height limitation for a sloping roof from 48' to 56' in the Public Accommodation zone district,, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Tabled to September 26, 2005 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 5-0-0 7. A request for final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for the subdivision of the Conference Center development site; final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a public convention facility and public parking facilities and structures; and final review of architectural deviations, pursuant to Section 8.3.3.A, Review Criteria for Deviations to the Architectural Design Guidelines for New Development, Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, to allow for a public convention facility and public parking facilities and structures, located at 395 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, Lots 3 'and 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Pylman & Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Tabled to September. 26, 2005 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 5-0-0 8. A request for a correction to the Vail Land Use Plan to designate the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Area, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Tabled to September 26, 2005 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 5-0-0 9. A request fora final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Sectidn,,~12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a public convention facility and public parking facilities and structures, located at 395 East Lionshead Circle/ Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 1, Lot 3 and 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Pylman & Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Withdrawn 10. A request for a correction to the Vail Land Use Plan to designate the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Area and an amendment to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan to amend, in part, Chapter 5, Vail Civic Center Detailed Plan Recommendations, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Pylman & Associates, Inc. Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Withdrawn Page 3 11. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 12-6F-6, Setbacks, 12-6F-9, Site Coverage, 12-6F-10, Landscaping and Site Development, 12-6F-11, Parking, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a residential addition, located at 4110 Spruce Way/Lot 24, Block 8, Bighorn Addition 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Michael and Elizabeth Taggart Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Withdrawn 12. Approval of August 22, 2005 minutes ACTION: Tabled to September 26, 2005 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 5-0-0 13. Information Update 14. Adjournment ACTION: Tabled to September 26, 2005 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 5-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published September 9, 2005, in the Vail Daily. y'i~' Page 4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ~• September 7, 2005 ~~~~~ ~ 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC WELCOME PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Sherry Dorward Pete Dunning Lynne Fritzlen Joe Hanlon Margaret Rogers SITE VISITS 1. .Lupine Drive Duplex - 3877 Lupine Drive 2. Furseth Residence - 5142 Snowshoe Lane 3. Spruce Creek Townhomes - 1750 South Frontage Road West 4. Cascades on Gore Creek - 1390 Westhaven Drive/ Driver: Warren 12:OOpm 2:OOpm PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:OOpm 1. JEC Residence DRB05-0302 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of new construction (landscape plan) 1386 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot G-2, Residences at Briar Patch Subdivision Applicant: Kemil Rizk, represented by Zehren & Associates ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 3-2-0 (Dorward 8~ Fritzlen opposed) 2. Mountain Adventure Center DR605-0416 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of a minor alteration (new door) 254 Bridge Street/Lot L, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Mountain Adventure Center, represented by Doug Sheehy ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 3. Vail Spa Condominiums DRB05-0091 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 710 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Spa Condominiums Homeowners Association ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Fritzlen SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 5-0-0 Page 1 4. Cascades on Gore Creek DRB05-0433 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of change to approved plans (repaint) 1390 Westhaven Drive/Cascades on Gore Creek Applicant: Cascades on Gore Creek Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 5. Furseth Residence DR605-0457 Bill Conceptual review of a separation.request (new two-family residence) 5142 Snowshoe Lane/Lot 21, Vail Meadows Filing 1 Applicant: Dalis Furseth, represented by Brent Biggs Conceptual review, no vote 6. Spruce Creek Townhome Condominium Association DRB05-0449 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (siding, balcony and handrails) 1750 South Frontage Road West/Spruce Creek Townhomes Applicant: Spruce Creek Townhome Association, represented by TRD Architects ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. The applicant shall paint the stucco base KVNAL's Sandcastle and the belly band on the ends of the building to match the hardi-plank siding, KWAL's Red Cedar. 7. Oberlohr Residence DRB05-0366 Bill Conceptual review of new construction (single-family residence) 2179 St. Moritz Way/Lot 6, Vail Heights Filing 1 Applicant: Konrad and Monika Oberlohr, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 8. .Lodge South Condominiums DR605-0306 Bill Conceptual review of a residential addition (major exterior alterations) 200 Vail Road/Lot 2, Lodge Subdivision Applicant: Lodge South Condominium Association, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S):. 1. The proposed mural shall be reviewed further with the applicant's future sign application. 9. Weyrauch Residence DRB05-0367 Bill Final review of new construction (primary/secondary residence) 2417 Garmisch Drive/Lot 14, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing 2 Applicant: Shawn Weyrauch, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 Page 2 10. Montauk Seafood Grill Deck DRB05-0411 George Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 549 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 Applicant: Bob and Diane Lazier, represented by Tom Ludwig ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 11. Vail Dover Associates, LLC DRB05-0376 George Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping) One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Vail Dover Associates, LLC, represented by Resort Design Associates ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 12. Lupine Drive Duplex DR605-0371 Final review of new construction (new duplex) 3877 Lupine Drive/Lot 6, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision Addition 1 Applicant: Rollie and Jeanne Kjesbo, represented by Kyle Webb ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 Staff Approvals Stephenson Residence DRB05-0370 Final review of a minor alteration (windows, sliding doors, .hot tub) 1448 Vail Valley Drive, Unit A/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1 Applicant: Robert Stephenson, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Dooley Residence DRB05-0364 Final review of a minor alteration (air conditioning unit) 174 East Gore Creek Drive., Unit 338/Lot A-C, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Tom and Barbara Dooley, represented by Beck Building Company Vail Dover Associates DRB05-0422 Final review of change to approved plans (service ramp) One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Bob McNichols, represented by Resort Design Associates Stevenson Residence DR605-0360 Conceptual review of change to approved plans (exterior materials) 1518 Spring Hill Lane/Lot 15, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1 Applicant: Ray Stevenson, represented by Scott Turnipseed Town of Vail DRB05-0399 Final review of new construction (boulder retaining wall and public street) St. Moritz Way/Vail Heights Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Chad Salli Matt Bill Elisabeth George Elisabeth Bill Page 3 Town of Vail DRB05-0424 Final review of change to approved plans (sidewalk) 1280 North Frontage Road/Unplatted Applicant: Town of Vail George Christiania LTD DRB05-0425 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 356 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Christiania at Vail Condominiums, represented by Master Sealers Oldaker/Thedford Residence DR605-0378 Bill Final review of a residential addition (living room addition) 1476 Westhaven Drive, Unit 23/Lot 53, Glen Lyon Applicant: William Oldaker and Judith Thedford, represented by Miramonti Architect PC Schoeve Residence DRB05-0417 Matt Final review of a minor alteration (door and deck) 1620 Sunburst Drive, Unit 29/Vail Golfcourse Townhomes :Applicant: Thomas & Karen Schoeve, represented by Eagle Design Construction Carbo Residence DR605-0436 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 4899 Meadow Drive/Lot 13, Block 5, Bighorn 5th Addition Applicant: Jorge Carbo, represented by Master Sealers Joe Villa Vallhalla DRB05-0437 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)384 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot K, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 5 . Applicant: Villa Vallhalla Homeowner's Association, represented by Master Sealers Ackerman Residence DR605-0438 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 1550 Lionsridge Loap/Lot 21, Block 2, Dauphinais-Mosley Filing 1 Applicant: Joan Ackerman, represented by Plath Construction Schaetzel Residence DRB05-0401 Final review of a minor alteration (hot tub, landscaping) 2566 Arosa Drive/Lot 5, Block C, Vail das Schone, Filing 1 Applicant: William and Barbara Schaetzel Matt Rojas Residence DRB05-0415 Matt Final review of change to approved plans (window) 400 East Meadow Drive, Unit 6/Lot 5D, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Enrique Rojas, represented by Michael Suman Architect, LLC Vail Corp. DR605-0427 Elisabeth Final review of a sign (temporary site development) 675 Lionshead Place/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Corp., represented by Katie Viene Page 4 Lapin Residence DRB05-0428 Final review of a minor alteration (hot tub) 212 West Meadow Drive/Lot 6, Vail Village Filing 2 Applicant: Merv Lapin Bill Webb Residence DRB05-0430 Bill Final review of a minor alteration (window) 680 West Lionshead Place, Unit 407/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Toby Webb, represented by Alleman Construction, Inc. Trankina Residence DR605-0431 Bill Final review of a minor alteration (windows, balcony door) 680 West Lionshead Place, Units 404 and 405'/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Mark and Susan Trankina, represented by Alleman Construction, Inc. Vickers Residence DRB05-0388 Elisabeth Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping) 3140 Booth Falls Court, Unit A/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: Ken and Becki Vickers Kendrick Residence DR605-0426 Bill Final review of change to approved plans (pergola) 2975 Manns Ranch Road/Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Clinton and Mary Kendrick, represented by Beck Building Company Polidor Residence DR605-0441 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 4284 Columbine Drive, Units C and D/Lot 20-1, 20-2, Bighorn Subdivision a resubdivision of Lot 20 Applicant: Ruthanne Polidori Shannon Residence DRB05-0452 Bill Final review of change to approved plans (windows) _ 245 Forest Road/Lot 22, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Mike and Mary Sue Shannon, represented by Kyle Webb Sonnenalp DRB05-0429 George . Final review of change to approved plans (window grilles) 20 Vail Road/Lot 1, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Resort Design Associates Town of Vail DR605-0442 George Final review of change to approved plans (planter) One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer Kemp Residence DRB05-0439 George Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 1379 Westhaven Drive/Lot 2, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Jack and JoAnn Kemp, represented by Fitz & Gaylord Landscaping, Inc Page 5 Moore Residence DR605-0435 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 2308 Garmisch Drive/Lot 15, Block G, Vail das Schone Filing 2 Applicant: John and Susan Moore Lamb Residence DR604-0260 Matt Final review of one year extension to original application 3130 Booth Falls Court/Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: Lamb Trust . Ranallo Sign DRB05-0459 Joe Final review of a sign 1701 F Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 6, Eleni Zneimer Subdivision Applicant: Pat Ranallo, represented by Mountain Construction & Management Co. LLC Town of Vail DR605-0465 George Final review of a minor alteration (wildfire mitigation at Donovan Park) Donovan Park upper bench, unplatted Matterhorn Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Bill Carlson Cascade Village DRB05-0420 Matt Final review of.a minor alteration (recreation path) Gore Valley Trail Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie Town of Vail DRB05-0421 Matt Final review of a minor alteration (recreation path) Gore Valley Trail Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie Town of Vail DRB05-0443 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 75 South Frontage Road/Unplatted • Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Yampah Builders, Inc. CanonNickers Residence DRB05-0391 Elisabeth Final review of a minor alteration (repaint, shutters) 3140 Booth Falls' Court, Units A and B/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: John Canon_ and Ken Vickers Dawson Residence DRB05-0466 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 891 Sandstone Circle/Lot 4, Block 3, Sandstone Circle Condominiums Applicant: Deborah Dawson Rickman Residence DRB05-0448 Matt Final review of change to approved plans (entrance) 1495 Lion's Ridge Loop/Lot 2, Block 3, Lions Ridge Filing 2 Applicant: Patricia Rickman, represented by Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Page 6 Reimers Residence DR605-0458 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 3090 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 8, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 11 Applicant: Arthur and Lindsey Reimers, represented by Fitz & Gaylord Landscaping Inc. Dantas Residence DR605-0447 Final review of change to approved plans (floor plan changes) 1788 Alpine Drive/Lot 12, Vail Village West Filing 1 Applicant: Dantas Builders, represented by Michael Pukas Rojas Residence DRB05-454 Final review of change to approved plans (chimney) 400 East Meadow Drive, Unit 6/Lot 5D, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Enrique Rojas, represented by Michael Suman Architect Landers Residence DRB05-0446 Final review of a minor alteration (exterior materials) 1454 Greenhill Court/Lot 1, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: John and Debra Landers Chapin Residence DR605-0461 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 2618 Larkspur Lane/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Intermountain Subdivision Applicant: David Chapin Landmark Lodge DR605-0410 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 616 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Associates, represented by Jeffrey Babb Racquet Club Condominiums DRB05-0237 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 4695 Vail Racquet Club Drive/Lot 1, Vail Racquet Club Condominiums Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by John Russell Crack of Noon, LP DRB05-0460 Change to approved plans (exterior lighting, floor plan changes) 1722 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 5, Block A, Lia Zneimer Subdivision Applicant: Crack of Noon, L.P., represented K.H. Webb Architects Vail Associates Inc. DRB05-0419 Final review of a minor alteration (public restroom) South of 458 Vail Valley Drive/Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7 Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Jeffrey Babb McCarthy. Residence DRB05-0468 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 1101 Vail View Drive/Lot 11 B, Casolar Vail Applicant: Brendan McCarthy Elisabeth Matt Warren Elisabeth Elisabeth Matt Elisabeth Warren Joe Page 7 Canon Residence DRB05-0412 Elisabeth Final review of minor alteration (new deck, landscaping, retaining wall) 3140 Booth Falls Court, Unit B/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: John Canon Higgins Residence DRB05-0467 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (exterior changes) 1465B Greenhill Court/Lot 9, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Paul and Ursula Higgins, represented by Heid Construction Withdrawn Bogard Residence DRB05-0167. Elisabeth Conceptual review of new construction (single family residence) 1388 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot G2, Residences at Briar Patch Applicant: Thomas and Marina Bogard, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 far information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Page 8 `~` o" , u t a i :- ! - -, __ i SIGNED ACCESS. I ' RESTRICTION- I 1 VALL PULI CLUB I'{{ TRANSR BUSAND 7 PNASE3 M~/~~ -. ' ^,~ TALIBMAN LODGE - ."IJ~D ; EXfTMONL~ ~G~ ` -. ~ ~ r'.~ - - FIRE STATION - ~ ~ ~~°. ;~ ,, i 1\ PHASES + ti "`///111 / lL .. ~N '~; }~ ~ ~` ~~ S(1NNEVAIP ~• RESOR7 4 V _ ~ :,~~ i ~~ R ~ _ VATL fTLTAGE lNN ~ , PLAlA CONDOS - _'b~.~ FRONTgOERO.fO -- _ - _- _-~ -_~ , ~\ f ', C ~ `SMaNpGE ON FRONTA(£ROAD r]j TO WARN OF ACCESS CROSSROADS C~`.` f RESTRICTIONS - REDEY£LOPMEM $ ` rill (WTTHORAWNAUGUSTZWS) ~ I P(idS6l 61 - \`\ ~ ~/`'` .+ PHASE . ~~[[ ~~ Vim"\\\L 4 3 ati \ ... 1i~ it A7`~ I 14 , ~' oNE muaw + L~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ BRmcE Ra.D ~ ~ {~~ / TATISMAN _ S j ~ ` ~ LODCE [, ~~', 1 ~ ~' ~ ~S ~ y~ !~ ~ATED ACCESS, PARXING T ~ -'! l (( RESTPoCTIOIJ- # ! `~I ~IAANSIT BIR OICV GARAGE ~ s'.11. ~ TO THE EAST _ i \ Oaa` ~ -~-~ ~,;- ^ y- -- ,t ~. W'$~ ~ ; AUSTRIA _-i - ~ L VTLUGF. &GNED RATERSECTION HAUS ~ _f IJL Cih'TER 1 TuEwAaduND (sssn aamusl - REDniECT UNAUTHORIZED ~. TRAFFIC 1, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._.. _ v MOUNTAIN /} Tuus RESTRICTION '/ ~ TRANSIT BUSANp rAUSMAN LODGE ETRRANCE OrvLv (T TO THE WEST I ,,f1 1 ~ /, '/ /~ • t / `!. - ' Vail East Meadow Drive INFORMATION AND CIRCULATION - ~ y"~~~ •_ ` -'MLLOw BRIDGE 0.pAD SIGNED ~ \ _ ~ _. ~F ACCESS RESTRICTION-ONE WAV' ~` ~l"'V-~•`` S ~', - AUiO TRAFFIC FROM VILLAGE, ' rnawA,r TG Menoow oRrvE C1~gK ~\ LEGEND ~~`t~ ~. Fy.'.„+~. ~ ~ .i -~ 'tea ' ~ T .~~ ~', _ ~ CNECIG`OINi CHA1IlJE- ACCE39 RESTRICTION TO r 9 ~ _ ~. ~-'^--~_ - +..-/. . VILLAGE-TURNAROUND a ,~ ~ (30n RPDNSIOR EJIR ON o ~. - ' 5!T-/ MARX WLLIOW BRIDGE ROAD r ~ G1 . ' ~ LODGE 4 vary VILLAGE _ . ~- -,~1; y-,- ' , - - ~ . .l © euz,ro .mmwo.,w~~,.w rcm,ie Apo Nur~oa'onF we~anr~ ® w~,aa~a~aUOU,~..weaw ~o~rtmn /~' nuA~mn~m,wmw.cuc.Aw.w e.~ ,,,a,,.,e.~,,..~,~No ~n k ---~'_---_~~ ,A - 'a , - ~~~ ~ - ~~ YA/L PL1U CLUB ~~A , i ~ ~ I '.: PHASE 3 J / V G ,.. N ~ is - Riv~.. _ : - .. ~ ~ ~.:~ ~ ........ V ~I i r~'~ '~~. AfAYOR1 ~ j FIRF. ~~STATTON '\~ ' 1 PARK j~' ; ~~\ ~ , . .r ~ F IREDFiPT STAGlNC Af2~l ~ l I ~ ' " i : , I fjty / ..~ , ;J ~; ~1 - AlL VlLL1 L /NN PL.1Z1 CONDOS _ `\ PHASE I`QI ~\ PAAS6 :y 7, , i r SONNSNAtP X ~~ - ~V' - RESOA7 - ~C3 S y Z 1 \ LODGE ' , ~ I 1. ~%_ _ 1 ~> , (., .. Vail East Meadow Drive PROJECT COST SHARING ONE RTLCOW .~ ~~\ ~ ~: -' •• ~ _. 8R2GE ROAD ~ /J VILGCE CEN]&R 1, `\ ' •~ ._~ i ~ ~; ~ IfAVS _ C ~pRE ~ ~s";'s,'.~w LEGEND _11, (/ ,ti ; ... _~ ~~ ~ -.rip ` t. I S ~• ~-7 SI17ALIAK ~ LO7XIE ~ ~, 7 j __ jj .. .:Y I . i, VA//. ~'~--'-" VILL~fGE _:f. r ~.~ s¢o araEE*srwve,ravru or via Ew~~oEO ~0%~ WTEEY t~ pWf~mfrb~ft I]1MI ~ U,a0om0 AVY~ P~O%tOXw FinY 1]amYbiiriY~ {iYe]S~,pW~ Q nRaYOSEO SrnEerswE,wnrwxr ruROEO~ d: ~~ ~F ~~~N039A ~RepEVELOwEHfI PPdW6ED SLPEEIBC~PE, 90wrENNPi1W C09TBrW1E- s rn saRRErwP~~amoRnwrav~ xvr.fsmooo ]A r(IVM OF V,u~.Mwi~lowrFivq Tpff:v~~-I~.bm.oaa P~wATCWdaNE lNUav e~R[If^£RO~~ bus. v~,R .: '._..r--'-_.-c..~ ®n k VAIL ROAD STREETSCAPE • SDTEflSCaPE WPROVEMEMS BY VAL PLAZA C1U010 BE COORUINAIED WIII1 SOWN Of VAR WPROVEMFNIS LA BOTTEGA DINING DECK • RECONSIFUCTON PER OWNERS CIRfC11pN • PRNA14 DINING AMENITY iO3ERVE AS HIGH' AC11VRi ANCHOR AIWL51 !ND OF PGDf1YRIAN PROMENADE •UPGRADfp LANDSCAPE tO PROVIp[BLTFFER "" "'-'"' "' ""' WIM STREET t.~~ KE~~fE - ;, - ~ I I R~Jy \ ~ ! \, \, ~. ~,N~~ ~~ 1 (/ / ''~~ AfAfORB 1 ' / F'/RE ~ PARY F~~JI t% S1:,T10N / ~ ~ ?LI ~~ S7Af/NC AR~.1 I J/ ` f ` ,, ~l '~i !~ . EAST MEADOW DRIVE STREETSCAPE nPROVEMfNIi 10 nCCUMMOCnIE IRnNtlt AND • PEDESBiuN CIPCULATION, PAVES USED 10 DISTMGH6N Htf • UPGRADED URUTIFS WRN SNOWMELTEO CONCRETE UNrt PAVER CRNEI ANE AND WAIKW AY • rlOftt FOR:NFOPMAMIN ANSI WAVFINONG • IIGHING ANp UNDSGPE ENHANCEMENTS • NEWSPAPER pItTRIBVTION . ,.... CROSSROADS STREETSCAPE -~-__ _ -- _: _ _ • SNOWMfITED CONCRETE IINR PAVER ~ _~ `' "-~ ._. _ ' _. wAlxwnr ~ ~`. F'RONTAC~'RO-. .._.__ ..__...~'" . iA ~ VAIL VILLAGE PLAZA f- ~`~----.:.:.,-~' - _ ._. .-_. ~ ~~ ~t ..~ _. IQZ I •OVETACIIVIIY LONE Af CENTER Of 1 __?..._.~.. `- '' - --.... _ ~ _._ -- -. ,_- . P[DFStR1AN PROMENADE ' _ _ y i •DESIGN REMFNT NOi YEF fINA1QED I I "'•~- -`'-~ -_ _ ' DINING" ...: I ,.'' ,,•..,.._.... :. DECK ' ~/ I - 1 ~ , PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY i ' ~ ~ AT PARKING GARAGE VAIL PL1lA CLUB - ~ - ""- CRDSSA6/OS • SNOWMFIiED CONCRETE PAVER REDE'VL'LOPNL'NT I ( s - WALKWAY AND ORNEUNE PHASE) VAIL VILLfGf 1NN ~ ,_~'~ •REtA1MNG wALLNFNBANKMENI ~ PLAZR COND0.S fWITNDRAWNAUGf/5T7p0JJ t I PROVIDE SPACEfOR SEARNG. wAIER • PNASA/RI \ ~ FEATURE S1iKSONAIVBQIffG I ~.._ C a ''!J j~G'q'^ ~ OPPURIVNRIIFS. ANp PU&R'ART !I ~ PNASff ~ ~ .K J r 1 ' ~:. ., : ~ ~ ~ PAxuA~c 4 ~ ' i GA1UGfi _.1i g. AST .. __ ~ ,, ~ ,~ _ ^i~ °' r, C ~~ _ ..- r ewpcERaJO ~ y 1aLL,ECa• ~ J LJ ,. ~F "N ' CA'NTRA ` ~' A!/37R/A '- _ ' 7 `.Y TLODGBN fi JI. ~ ILEUS ''}_ :. YE' ,'. ~ Alr ,L, ~ _ _ ~ . T t~ ~" STREETSCAPE AT [J OA1''` ~~ / ~~ ~~ ~ `~` VILLAGE CENTER S r `~ '. ' ~ ' " '; ' ~' ~~~(~ • SNOEIVfFN11~CONCREit PAVER .`3- ' C+ • UPGRADFU LANDSCAPE IO BUFFIRt \, - 3 +~~ G~" •SUGMTWG ENNANCEMENiS SONNENALP/ONE WILLOW ~.- ~ '' ~~~1~fA BRIDGE ROAD STREETSCAPE ~-' _ ,... , • VARIETY Of IRGII AND IOW ACT'IIY AREAS "~_, '~-. ,. __ ,_ _-, ,.~ .. RFUIEO ro REtAR REDEVELOPMENT ALONG ENURE SOUTH SIDE OF pEOETRIAN IROMENADE ~' •SiREERCAPE IMPROVEMFNR ON PRNATE PROPERTY COORpBUTED WRN TOWNOF VAL -'-' ~`~4„i';, `~' ~~ IMPROVEAfENTS ~.. _ R UPGRADED WIDSCAPE 611ffER IO STREET _ t V^ ~•. '-~_f.-/-+~~ ~ f,1 ~ I PROPOSED PUBLIC RESTROOM °Lm, ' 'j . sfrwtRx LODGK i 1 . ~ _ i VA/L . ~,r._..I VILLAGE Vail East Meadow Drive MASTER PLAN : f I. _ ~ ~- - -.~/t ~ ~~ ..._ - 1 INTERSECTION • SNOWMELTEp CONCRETE UNR PAVER DRIVE tANE • COMBNE WITH CROSSRpAD3 PLAYA FOP SPECIAL PENIS AREA WILLOW BRIDGE ROAD • CONNECTION TO VAl VRSAGE NIEGRATE WITH VRIAGE SiR[Ci3CAPE • SNOWMELIID CONCRETE UNR PAVER DRIVE LANE IO INilRNARONAL BRIDGE • UGHiWG AND UNDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS n k n i - -T:--~ -r .._ _ __ _ i _ ~~ ;,.a :: ~ i '\ '.' ~ t ~ T Y iw k~l ~~Sj~ ~ I S :s; ~ ~ RSUPV£LOPM6'NT ~~Fq^_ '~ ,~ II 11 i' PAIL VI1L1Gt lNN (11T1NUR,IWNAVGUST7005J ~~ ' ~J/fed ~ ~.. .. ~ I PL,fy CONDOS ' RIVE. •' ~ ~ se I ~ '~. ¢~ -.. 'A r ~\\ M-A.~S ~'] r ~~ ` f ~` PARKING P1R£ ~ ° `yam 1. ~~ _~ ~ CARAG6 ~STATlON ~ ~ - ~ _ ~~ ` ~ ' I~Wn ~ =- =: T M ~~• / rrRensrr ~ .:. fem.. STAGlNC AREA ~ ...~ ~, ~S~ ~''~ ~~ _- ~.slj - ,. / ,.~1 J AS A7L(11Y~. t 1 ~~ )y1J ;fi 1, + - RESORr ~ R(DG&ROAU VILLAGE 1 -~,~ E' I / ' ~ ." ~.~ I v _ ,..~ ~+ :, ~, ;, CENS&R AU.SIRfA ..._ rr'' 1, ~ I ~ ~~ - rf 3- ~" ~ T LODGEN BA05 ' . i-""t. . S '' I ' ',~ ff .: .., .erg ,w~...... J f/AVS r` t- ~ ~ - r:. . Vail East Meadow Drive PROJECT PHASING VAU_ VLLLAGE ®~ k ...,, .,, . Memorandum To: Town Council From: Stan Zemler Judy Camp Gina Bentz Date: September 15, 2005 We are attaching the following information for the budget discussion on Tuesday: - Budget Calendar ' - Capital Projects Fund Five-Year Projection (C-1 through C-3) - Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) Fund Five-Year Projection (R-1 through R-3) Capital Projects Fund Five-Year Projection Sales tax is the primary source of revenue for the Capital Projects Fund. The five-year projection includes a 2.5% annual increase on base sales tax collections plus adjustments for the impact of redevelopment. Redevelopment has an unfavorable impact in 2005 and 2006 during construction and a favorable impact beginning in 2007 as projects are completed. Projects impacting sales tax estimates include Arrabelle/LionsHead Core Site, Four Seasons, One Willow Bridge, Tivoli, the Vail conference center, and Vail Plaza Hotel. Crossroads is projected to operate at current levels throughout the five-year period. The five-year projection assumes. 40% of the town's 4% general sales tax is used to fund capital projects. Capital maintenance and replacements are per the 15-yeaz plan presented at your last meeting. This includes street and bridge reconstruction projects in 2009 and 2010. Streetscape in the Crossroads azea has been added to both the Capital Projects Fund ($1.3 million) and the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund ($1.3 million) in 2007. The project was previously expected to be funded by the Crossroads developer. Construction of the West Vail fire station, Main Vail station renovations, and additional fire truck has been moved back one year. Softwaze licensing ($67K), replacement of the Community Development plotter ($9K), and continued funding of master plans ($SOK) have been added in 2006. Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund Five-Yeaz Projection Revenue from the town's 1 % real estate transfer tax increased significantly in 2005 as a result of both redevelopment and a healthy real estate mazket. The attached projections include a conservative estimate of 5% annual increase in transactions less than $10 million plus adjustments for specific redevelopment projects: Gore Creek Residences and One Willow Bridge in 2006; Arrabelle and Vail Plaza Hotel in 2007; and Four Seasons in 2008. Capital maintenance and replacements aze per the 15-yeaz capital asset plan. Major changes to the RETT fund projects since the 2005 budget include: streetscape in the Crossroads area mentioned above; $250,000 annually for forest health management; -1- $75K in 2006 to begin revisiting the Ford Park master plan; $300K in 2006 for additional open space acquisition; and various changes in recreation paths and park projects in the outer years. Vail Reinvestment Authority (VRAI A meeting was held with the County Assessor's office last week to discuss implementation of tax increment financing (TIF). Although the base of assessed valuations has been frozen, the incremental property tax due to the district is not expected to be significant until a year after completion of the Arrabelle project. One anticipated use of TIF funds is Frontage Road improvements that will be required at the time the conference center is built. The amount of Frontage Road improvements to be funded from TIF revenue in 2008 is expected to be $2.4 million. It is likely that funds for the Frontage Road will be needed before any significant revenue is received from TIF. The budget timetable originally anticipated a discussion of Vail Reinvestment Authority's proposed budget on September 20. At this time, however, we do not expect to have any activity requiring expenditures from the reinvestment authority in 2006. The Assessor's Office is currently reviewing the valuations in the TIF district and revenue for 2006, if any, is expected to be minimal. -2- Version 7 Changes Highlighted Town of Vail Proposed 2006 Budget Timetable Contributions Council criteria discussion Out of cycle funding requests (if needed) Deadline for return of packets Council Discussion & Questions of requests Council evaluation of requests and direction for 2006 budget Budget Guidelines Council discussion of budget timetable Council discussion of budget philosophies Guidelines distributed to department heads Presentation of 2004 audit report to Council 2005/2006 parking task force meeting Budget Preparation Capital budget request for county funds submitted Staff prepares departmental budgets Council discussion of major revenue items Town Manager reviews departmental budgets Council discussion of Capital plan Council discussion of RETT plan Council review of first draft of 5-year capital plan Council review of first draft of 5-year RETT fund Council review of second draft of 5-year capital plan Council review of second draft of 5-year RETT fund Council review of first draft of Town Manager's budget Budget Documentation and Reporting First reading of 2005 Supplemental Number Two Second reading of 2005 Supplemental Number Two First reading of 2006 budget ordinance Second reading of 2006 budget ordinance First reading of mil levy certification ordinance First reading of 2005 Supplemental Number Three First reading of 2006 Conference Center Budget Ordinance Second reading of mil levy certification ordinance Second reading of 2005 Supplemental Number Three Second reading of 2006 Conference Center Budget Ordinance Mil levy certification deadline to Eagle County Budget book submission 05/03/05 Complete 06/07/05 Complete 07/29/05 Complete 08/16/05 Complete 09/20/05 05/03/05 Complete 06/07/05 Complete 06/15/05 Complete 08/02/05 Complete 09/28/05 07/08/05 Complete 06/15/05 to 07/18/05 07/19/05 Complete 07/25/05 to 08/12/05 09/06/05 . Camplefe 09/06/05 ^ _Comptefe 09/20/05 09/20/05 10/04/05 10/04/05 10/04/05 if necessary if necessary 08/16/05 09/06/05 10/04/05 10/18/05 11/15/05 11/15/05 11/15/05 12/06/05 12/06/05 12/06/05 12/15/05 01/31/06 Complete ~Complete~ s Version 1 TOWN OF VAIL 2006 BUDGET PORPOSAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Revenue Net sales Tax Allocation of Sales Tax to CPF Transfer to GF for I-70 Noise mitigation Sales Tax Federal Grant Revenue Lease Revenue Transfer from General Fund Project Reimbursement Eagle County Grant Revenue Interest Income 8~ Other Total Revenue Expenditures Equipment Purchases Document Imaging Software ~ Hardware Upgrades Software Licensing Com Dev Plotter Web Page DevelopmenUEcommerce Eagle County CAD ! RMS Project Parking Equipment Replacement Police Copier Patrol Car Video Cameras Fire Truck Fire Department Breathing Apparatus RepowerBuses Replace Buses GPS for Buses 800 MHz radio system Vehicle Expansion Subtotal Equipment Purchases Capital Maintenance Bus Shelter Replacement Capital Street Maintenance Parking Structure Improvements General Facility Improvements 2nd Supp Amended 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Protect Information 15,576,100 16,679,700 18,178,365 18,977,994 19,750,086 - 6,230,440 6,671,880 7,271,346 7,591,198 7,900,034 6,349,400 6,230,440 6,671,880 1,271,346 7,591,198 7,191,400 1,740,240 811,800 4,900,000 510,000 600,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 62,000 1,100,468 27,000 27,000 - 500,000 25,000 19,000 16,000 11,000 17,000 20,000 9,427,108 7,238,240 7,364,880 12,332,346 8,268,198 7,961,400 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 48,000 140,486 77,000 72,000 43,000 52,000 78,000 s7,ooo 9,000 50,000 12,000 20,000 12,000 12,000 20,000 188,290 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 400,000 10,310 45,000 40% of total sales tax allocated to Capital Projects Bus replacements & Intermodal site in 2008 Lease revenue from City Market & employee housing To fund Multi-Purpose Recreation Facility VRI Agreement, ERWS, VRI, Eagle Cty Sch Dist,VRD, Mill Creek Court 07, West Vail Fire Station OCE maintenance, software upgrades, contract position Desktop OS upgrades, replacement PC's, server upgrades, AS400 Intemet security r£ application interfaces Countywide Computer Aided DispatchlRecords Mgmt System Purchase of new copier for records - 735,000 520,000 Replace pumper & refurbish Aerial Pumper,'08 Fire truck W. Vail 25,000 30,000 Replacement of cylinderslcompressor - 126,000 Replace transmissions and engines to extend useful life 2,430,700 3,854,200 143,400 2,199,600 4 buses ordered in'04 cxl to'05 ($1,361,526)+'05 budget 269,280 375,000 - 495,500 227,000 Replacement of e>asting radios for PW, Fire, PD 40,300 End dump truck, mower and generator for Special Operations Group 3,219,366 786,000 917,000 5,014,700 924,400 2,445,600 38,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 30,000 - 1,584,565 1,006,940 741,730 1,023,660 1,053,690 1,166,990 Preventive maint., patching, overlays,'05 Greenhill&Westhaven Brge 508,740 627,000 705,000 485,000 480,000 540,000 Various Pking Structure Improv.,'06 heat entry ramp,'07 elevatorreplacer 331,500 365,000 280,000 610,000 755,000 430,000 Various Facility Capital Improv., re-roofs'07,'08,'09 C-t Version 1 TOWN OF VAIL 2006 BUDGET PORPOSAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE Environmental Improvements Subtotal Capital Maintenance Street Reconstruction Buildings 8 Improvements Fire infrastructure improvements Fiber Optics in Buildings Dobson Ice Arena Way Finding Improvements Donovan Park Pavilion Multi-Purpose Recreation Facility Creekside Improvements Subtotal Bldgs I Improvements Streetscape Projects West & East Meadow Drive East Meadow Drive-Streetscape Heat Streetscape Crossroads area Village Streetscape Residential Reconstruct Mill CreekNVillow/East Vail Matterhorn Bridge Reconstruction Nugget Lane Bridge Reconstruction Subtotal Streetscape Projects Housing Program 2nd Supp Amended 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Project Information 24,000 2,462,805 2,032,940 1,756,730 2,128,680 2,318,690 2,136,990 Masterplan Costs/DesignlW. Vail Fire Station contingent on the ability; 270,635 500,000 2,000,000 975,000 to fund operations. Remodel of Main Vail Station 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Cabling /Network Infrastructure 10,000 Vail Recreation District -Design fees to expand capacity 79,284 Reivise TOV map w/ a electronic directory, directory for merchants 42,000 Additional blinds 88,000 Red Sandstone facility; revenue from partners included above 60,000 584,919 515,000 2,015,000 990,000 15,000 75,000 199,360 900,000 950,000 1,320,000 Construct streetscape, drainage, lighting, public art, landscaping -adds maintenance from Library to Fire Station - 965,000 1,025,000 Per councils request on 9!21104 1,300,000 2,674,615 1,535,300 includes engineer salary; also funded by RETT - 1,600,000 Overhaul residential streets 4,100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,873,975 3,400,300 3,275,000 1,320,000 2,800,000. 5,100,000 Buy-Down Program 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Net cost of deed restricted units for resale Timber Ridge Debt Service Guarantee 925,000 Timber Ridge Laan 700,000 Subtotal Housing Program 1,825,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 LionsHead Redevelopment Design costs to implement Town improvements: Construction costs for LionsHead Improvements 313,955 LionsHead Redevelopment will be funded from developer contributions, TIF & other sources Intermodal Site 3,750,000 Federal funding included in revenue C-2 Version 1 TOWN OF VAIL 2006 BUDGET PORPOSAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE 2nd Supp Amended 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Subtotal LionsHead Redevelopment 313,955 - - 3,750,000 - - Other Improvements Revise TOV Master Plans 100,000 50,000 Street Light Improvement Program 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Drainage Improvements 75,000 - I-70 Noise 526,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 E. Vail Radio Tower 25,000 _ Subtotal Other Improvements 751,000 350,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 325,000 Total before Financing W. Vail Station Bonds Main Vail Renovations Bonds W. Vail Station Debt Service Main Vail Renovations Debt Service Transfer for Debt Service Total Expenditures Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance 12,011,020 7,084,240 8,363,730 13,603,360 6,258,090 10,182,590 (2,000,000) (925,000) 57,213 164,425 162,450 31,914 153,828 2,422,154 2,236,200 2,322,497 2,321,825 2,320,363 Project Information Including ~Ilage, LionsHead and West Vail Add new street lights and refurbish residential lighting program Continue implementation of drainage master plan; 06 wlCap Streets Certficates of Participation (GOP's) 25 year term (COP's)15 year term 165,425 151,173 2,317,803 To fund debt service on all Town bonds 14,433,174 9,320,440 8,743,440 15,196,524 8,894,731 12,816,991 (5,006,066) 8,190,902 (2,082,200) 3,184,836 (1,378,560) (2,864,178) (626,533) 1,102,636 (275,924) (3,140,102) (4,855,591) (3,766,635) $ 3,184,836 $ 1,102,636 $ (275,924) $ (3,140,102) $ (3,766,635) $ (8,622,226) C•3 Version 1 REVENUE Real Estate Transfer Tax -Base Adjust for trend ' Adjust for redeviopment Real Estate Transfer Tax Federal Grant Golf Course Lease Lottery Revenue Project Reimbursements Interest Income & Other Transferfrom GF Recreation Amenity Fees Total Revenue EXPENDITURES Annual Mairnenance RETT Collection Costs Rec. Path Capital Maintenance Alpine Garden Support Tree Maintenance Forest Heatlh Management Street Fumiiure Replacement Black Gore Creek Sand Mitigation Park Capital Maintenance Bear Proof Containers Park, Path & Landscape Maintenance Subtotal Maintenance TOWN OF VAIL 2006 BUDGET PROPOSAL Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund Five-Year Summary of Revenue and Expenditures 2nd Supp Amended 2005 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 Project Irrfonnation 4,300,000 4,520,000 4,750,000 5,000,000 900,000 3,210,000 865,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 5,200,000 $ 7,730,000 $ 5,615,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,250,000 150,000 115,956 119,435 123,018 126,708 130,509 133,800 20,000 zo,ooo 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 3,300 79,000 56,000 57,000 65,000 75,000 77,300 10,762 360 000 125,000 125,000 25 000 25,000 25,000 6,589,018 .5,520,435 8,205,018 5,851,708 5,250,509 5,506,100 300,000 213,628 122,000 137,000 37,030 100,000 114,500 19,500 1,097,991 260,000 386,500 280,750 250,000 21'0,400 140,000 144,200 148,526 152,982 157,571 100,000 54,080 56,243 58,493 58,493 33,000 87,000 60,000 60,000 .65,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 95,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 Adjusted to trend Grant award for TimberRidge-Buffehr Crk road seperation 2005 adjusted due to redevelopment; outer years due to trend Collection fee remitted to the General Fund Capital maintenance of the town's rec. path system 05 $44K for pond reconfiguration,'O6 Interprative stationslpavers Provide additional trees to Vail's public areas, includes 50K Forest H Pine beetle mitigation inconjunction w/ VA & forest service Additions and replacement of street furniture New in'D5 to maintain playgrounds, restrooms, etc. In TOV parks 1,213,768 1,260,802 1,253,900 1,360,453 1,401,267 Ongoing path, park and open space maintenance, project mgr 2,141,649 2,218,768 2,407,582 2,279,419 2,368,928 2,447,731 Recreation PathlTrail Development Katsos Ranch - 500,000 500,000 Resurface rec path from Sunburst to E. Vail Cascade Skier Biridge 106,305 bridge improvements contingent on Tract K Cascade Bike Path 150,000 Widen recreation path from W. Haven to tennis courts TimberRidge-Buffehr Crk Rd Seperation 450,000 R•1 Version 1 LionsHead to Meadow Bridge Streamwalk DA & Safety Improvemetns Trailhead Development N. Frontage Rd. (School to Roundabout) Village Streetscape Design & Implement Streetscape for Crossroads area Meadow Drive Frontage Road Bike Trail Subtotal Pathways Capital Maintenance ADA Compliance w! VRD Dobson Roof Replacement Raw Water Project Stream Tract Incursion Survey Pirate Ship Park -Per Safety Plan Big Hom Park -Per Safety Plan Red Sandstone Park - Per Safeiy Plan Ford Park Safety Improvements Retrofit Park Restrooms-3 seasons Landscape Medians Public Art Sibert Circle Subtotal Capital Maintenance Park Development Donovan Park White Water Park Gore Creek Promenade Bridge LionsHead Park Booth Creek Park Redevelopment Public Restrooms Skate Park TOWN OF VAIL 2006 BUDGET PROPOSAL Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund Five•Year Summary of Revenue and Expenditures 2nd Supp Amended 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Projectlnforrnation 135,000 150,000 36,555 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 57,256 2,300,000 1,250,000 1,300,000 25,000 1,025,000 800,000 1,080,000 850,000 450,000 577,500 2,875,116 2,795,000 3,920,000 1,700,000 155,000 577,500 - Improve trailheads Fund Path from Red Sandstone Pedestiran Brdg to Roundabout 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 300,000 - 228,097 - - 35,000 36,888 225,000 - 200,000 100,000 200,000 570,000 167,419 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 80,000 1,134,000 1,876,404 325,000 895,000 75,000 375,000 180,000 49,734 - 118,317 - 125,000 - 100,000 690,000 - 250,000 - 420,000 100,000 300,000 R-2 along E. Meadow drive infront of crossroads Construct widened 6' shoulders along all frontage roads; first priority is Blue Cow Chute to East Vail Shared costs with VRD -recreational facilities Convert parks from treated water to raw water Funds 3rd hole at Whitewater Park Reconstruct park W. Meadow Drive & Vail Road Per wuncils request 10119104 ~~ Version t TOWN OF VAII 2006 BUDGET PROPOSAL Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund Five•Year Summary of Revenue and Expenditures 2nd Supp Amended 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Project Information Ford Park Revised Masterplan 75,000 Ford Park Master Plan-Improvements - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - Revisit Ford Park Management Plan adopted in April of'97 Subtotal Park Development 149,734 618,317 1,770,000 1,890,000 1,000,000 - Open Lands Open Space Acquisition Subtotal Open Lands Project Management Parks and Landscaping AIPP Subtotal Project Management Total Expenditures Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance 500,000 300,000 - - - - 500,000 300,000 - 81,735 Landscape architect moved to Park, Path Landscape line item 84 326 58 598 60 356 62167 64,032 65,953 AIPP salary and operating expenses related to RETT 166,061 58,598 60,356 62,167 64,032 65,953 7,508,964 8,313,683 9,052,938 5,808,586 3,980,980 3,271,184 (919,946) (793,246) (847,920) 5,682,551 4,762,605 3,969,357 45,122 1,289,550 2,234,916 3,121,436 3,166,559 4,456,109 $ 4,762,805 $ 3,969,357 $ 3,121,436 $ 3,166,559 $ 4;456,109 $ 6,691,025 R-3 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 21 SERIES 2005 AN ORDINANCE SUBMITTING A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE TOWN OF VAIL HOME RULE CHARTER TO THE VOTERS OF THE TOWN PURSUANT TO COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, SECTION 31-2-210 AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, Section 31-2-210 of the Colorado Revised Statutes authorizes the governing body of a Colorado home rule municipality to submit proposed Home Rule Charter amendments to the voters of such municipality by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the "Town") Town Council (the "Council") wishes to refer a measure amending Subsection 7.2(a) of the Town Home Rule Charter concerning municipal court jurisdiction to the Town electors at the November 2005 regular municipal election; and WHEREAS, to be included on the November 2005 ballot, the ballot title for such measure must be established by September 20, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Council therefore desires to refer the ballot measure and set the ballot title concerning the amendment of Home Rule Charter Subsection 7.2(a) by this emergency ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: Section 1. The following proposed amendment to the Town of Vail Home Rule Charter is hereby submitted to the voters of the Town for their consideration at the Vail regular municipal election to be conducted on November 8, 2005: Amend Subsection 7.2(a) of the Charter as follows: Section 7.2 Judiciary Compensation: (a) Presiding Municipal Judge. There shall be a municipal court vested with e~ jurisdiction of all cases arising under the ordinances of the town and as may be conferred by law. The municipal court shall be presided over and its functions exercised by a judge,. appointed by the council for a specified term of two (2) years: The council may, when his appointment for term of office expires, re-appoint the municipal judge. Any vacancy Ordinance 21, Series 2005 in the office of municipal judge shall be filled by appointment by the council for the remainder of the unexpired term. Section 2. Ballot Title. The ballot title for the Charter Amendment referred to the voters by this Ordinance shall read as follows: SHALL THE HOME RULE CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, BE AMENDED TO ELIMINATE THE EXCLUSIVITY OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL COURT'S JURISDICTION OF ALL CASES ARISING UNDER THE ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN? Section 3. Severability. If any provision- of this Ordinance is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance will remain valid, it being the intent of the Town of Vail that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. Section 4. Repealer. All ordinances or resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, provided that such repealer shall not repeal the repealer clauses of such ordinance nor revive any ordinance thereby. Section 5. EmerQencv Measure. The Council finds and determines that original exclusive jurisdiction of all cases arising under the ordinances of the Town in the Town municipal court could lead to an increase in both the number and complexity of cases filed with such court. The Council further finds that the Town municipal court is likely unable to handle such an increase in case load with its current resources and available budget. The Council further finds that, a significant increase in municipal court docketing and scheduling to accommodate civil matters otherwise brought in district court under Rule 106(a)(4) of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure could deter the swift dispensation of local criminal matters and enforcement of Town laws, to the detriment of the health, safety and welfare of all citizens of the Town of Vail. The Council therefore desires to ensure that the electors of the Town be given the opportunity to vote on the Charter Amendment referred herein at the next possible election, for which the ballot title must be established by .September 20, 2005. Based upon all of the foregoing, the Council finds and declares that there is reasonable justification for the adoption of this Ordinance as an emergency measure, that this Ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public welfare, and that this Ordinance shall therefore take effect immediately upon adoption as provided by Section 4.11 of the Vail Home Rule Charter. Ordinance 21, Series 2005 2 INTRODUCED, READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AS AN EMERGENCY MEASURE BY THE UNANIMOUS VOTE OF COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT OR A VOTE OF FIVE (5) COUNCIL MEMBERS, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED THIS 20th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2005. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Rodney Slifer, Mayor ATTEST: By: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance 21, Series 2005 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Pam Brandmeyer Judy Camp Matt Mire Suzanne Silverthorn DATE: September 20, 2005 SUBJECT: Outside Vendors BACI(GROUND During Town Council's review of the Visitor Information Center operating contract at the August 16, 2005, evening meeting there was a suggestion to require vendors who do business in the Town of Vail to obtain a Vail business license. The purpose of the suggestion was to provide a level playing field between businesses located within the town and vendors coming into town to conduct business. In researching the matter and reviewing the Town Code, Matt Mire has concluded that businesses must be physically located within the town to qualify for a business license. As such, this would prohibit a vendor located outside the Town of Vail from obtaining equity through a Vail business license. One possible approach is to address the equity issue through the Visitor Information Centers, with a second path addressing all other outside vendors. In the case of the Visitor Information Centers, the Town Manager has the discretion to create a reasonable brochure space rental fee for use by participating vendors* who do not otherwise qualify for a business license fee, such as a rafting or hot air balloon company. To address equity among other vendors who do business in town, additional research is needed to determine how other communities are handling this circumstance. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL • Provide direction to the Town Manager regarding pursuit of a rental fee for display of informational material and brochures for activities'and amenities provided by outside vendors in accordance with the Visitor Information Center policy listed below. • Provide direction to the Town Manager for additional staff research to determine how other communities are addressing the outside vendor equity issue. *It is the policy of the Vail Visitor Information Centers to first and foremost offer visitors information on the amenities offered within the Town of Vail. These amenities include lodging, restaurants, businesses and services. If the guest's request does not exist within the Town of Vail, a comparable amenity within the Town of Vail should be offered. If this still does not accommodate the guest's needs, it is appropriate to offer a business within the Vail Valley but not within. the Town of Vail in order to display excellent customer service. It is acceptable to offer guest activities that are not located within the Town of Vail when no other Vail-based options are available. TOWN COUNCIL EVENING SESSION AGENDA 6 P.M. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 NOTE: ~ Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. ITEM/TOPIC: Citizen Input (10 min.) 2. ITEM/TOPIC: Construction Update. (5 min.) Greg Hall 3. Nina Timm ITEM/TOPIC: Transfer Request re: $10,000 from the Town's Buy- down Program to the Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program (15 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Transfer $10,000 from the Town's buy down program to the Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program has helped 34 employees purchase homes within the Town of Vail. The buy-down program has previously donated a total $17,000 to this fund. The goal is to have this loan program be self-sustaining by 2008. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends $10,000 be transferred from the buy-down program to the Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program. 4. ITEM/'TOPIC: Council Contributions (1 hour) Pam Brandmeyer Judy Camp Staff will have prepared a master matrix in time for Tuesday afternoon's discussion on Council Contributions for'06. Please drop off your working papers first thing Tuesday morning, unless you have already done so, so Penny has time to compile them. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Discussion of 2006 contribution requests that have been submitted to staff on July 29, 2005 for 2006 funding. This decision, however, will not be final until the adoption of the 2006 budget in October. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: To be provided in separate memo STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To be provided in separate memo. • Commission on Special Events Update 5. Warren Campbell ITEM/TOPIC: Mountain Haus Request to Proceed Through the Process (15 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with modifications, or deny the applicant's request to proceed through the development review process. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: It is the desire of the Mountain Haus to apply for a design review application to construct a new covered entry and alter the landscaping on the west elevation of the existing building within the Town of Vail right-of-way for Slifer Square. Since the Mountain Haus is proposing to construct and alter on Town of Vail property, Town Council permission is required to proceed through the development review process. If Council grants permission to proceed through the process, the applicant will need to move forward with their Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board applications. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends the Town Council give the Mountain Haus and their representative further direction on this matter to proceed through the design review process. 6. Matt Mire ITEM/TOPIC: Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2005, an ordinance submitting a proposed amendment to Section 7.2 of the Town of Vail Home Rule Charter, which would limit the "exclusive jurisdiction" of the Vail Municipal Court (20 min) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Ordinance 21, Series 2005. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: A recently decided Colorado Supreme Court case (Town of Frisco v. Baum, 90 P. 3d 845 (Colo. 2004), appears to have expanded the jurisdiction of the municipal court in certain home rule municipalities that have adopted charter language granting themselves "exclusive and original" jurisdiction. More specifically, the Supreme Court's decision upheld the ruling of the District Court, that it lacked jurisdiction over a C.R.C.P. Rule 106 appeal of a zoning decision and that such cases are the jurisdiction of the municipal court. Since the Town of Vail has also adopted such charter language and since our belief is that the municipal court is NOT the proper venue for these matters, Section 7.2 of the Town of Vail Charter must be amended to limit the jurisdiction of the Town of Vail Municipal Court to handling criminal matters. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance 21, Series 2005. 7. Matt Mire ITEM/TOPIC: Town of Vail matching employee financial contributions to the American Red Cross for Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. (5 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: To the extent the Town Council has decided that it is appropriate for the Town of Vail to match the amount of employees' financial contributions to the American Red Cross for Hurricane Katrina relief efforts, the Council should make the following finding via motion: "That providing matching funds is for the public purpose of intergovernmental cooperation and assisting with the cost of providing food, shelter, clothing and other necessities for the victims of Hurricane Katrina in Colorado and elsewhere in the United States." BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town Council has expressed the desire to match the Town employees' financial contributions to the American Red Cross for the hurricane Katrina relief efforts, through its Council Contingency Fund. The employee contribution totaled $3,500.50. 8. ITEMlTOPIC: Town Manager's Report (10 min.) - Pine Beetle Mitigation Update re: Upper Bench of Donovan Park - Holy Cross Easement 9. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (8:20 P.M.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 6 P.M. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4,.2005, IN VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Eagle County Homebuyer's Assistance Committee Nina Timm DATE: September 20, 2005 SUBJECT: Transfer of money from the Buy Down Program to the Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program I. Introduction In 1998 Eagle County created the Down Payment Assistance Program. to help employees in Eagle County purchase their first home here. The Down Payment Assistance Program is overseen by a group of citizen volunteers. The Town of Vail has had a representative on the committee for the past two years. From 1994 to 2004 median home prices in Eagle County have increased 103%. During that same time wages have only increased 54%. Since the program's inception 174 working households have purchased a home with.a loan from the Down Payment Assistance Program. Thirty four (34) of those homes have been in the Town of Vail equaling approximately $340,000 in loans for purchases in Vail. The goal is to have the fund be self-sustaining by 2008. To reach that goal various entities throughout Eagle County have contributed money to this fund, including the Town of Vail. The other entities include: Eagle County, Vail Board of Realtors, First Bank, Alpine Bank, Wells Fargo, WestStar Bank, Colorado Division of Housing, Town of Avon, Town of Gypsum, Town of Eagle, Town of Minturn, Land Title, Stewart Title and the Vail Local Housing Authority. II. Request ,, Previously the Town of Vail has donated $17,000. At this time, the request is to reallocate $10,000 from the buy down fund to the Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program. The typical loan amount for a home buyer, from the down payment assistance fund, is $10,000. This donation would fund a new loan. A donation from the Town of Vail as well as the other entities listed above will also help create a self- sustaining loan fund to permanently provide down payment assistance loans to local employees in Eagle County. MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE:. September 20, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to proceed through the development review process with a proposal to construct private improvements on Town of Vail property. Applicant: Mountain Haus, .represented by Paul Smith Planner: Warren Campbell I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST Request to proceed through the development review process with a proposal to construct private improvements on Town of Vail property. 11. BACKGROUND It is the desire of the Mountain Haus to apply for a design review application to construct a new covered entry and alter the landscaping on the west elevation of the existing building within the Town of Vail right-of-way for Slifer Square (Attachment A). Since the Mountain Haus is proposing to construct and alter Town of Vail property„Town Council permission is required to proceed through the development review process. If Council grants permission to proceed through the process the applicant will need to proceed forward with their Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board applications. In general the applicant is asking to: • Construct a new covered entry to the Vail Estates tenant space located on the western elevation (Attachment B); and • Construct a paved area with flag stone in the existing planter box in order to place a picnic table or bench in the planting bed. An application, which was very similar to the one being proposed was granted approval by the Town Council to proceed through the development review process for improvements located within the Town right-of-way on July 14, 1998. Subsequent~aapprovals for setback and site coverage variances were granted by the Planning and Environmental Commission on August 10, 1998, and Design Review Board granted approval on September 2, 1998. All of the approvals identified above have. sense expired and in order to pe1-form the improvements III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council grants the Mountain Haus, and their representative, permission to proceed through the design review process. IV. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Plans depicting encroachments into the right-of-way r _ - . *~ _. Mountain Haus --Request For Perm~ss~on to Proceed Through the Process - 1 .. ,~. ~~. 292 East Meadow Drive Town of Vail Council -September 20, 2005 ~~ ~~~~I ~ ~~ .. 1 ~-1 ~~-~`. ~ 1. ~ 7 ~~t~ St{~:o`I} ~~t = '.~E. y~~ ~~-~I~ ~ . .. } _, r ~- ~ . ~., k..~- ~J.' ~., art r.? ~ M- j ~ ~ sw ~ 1 t - ~~1~.!lt ~+ ~'~ ~-~ S mil - y I~~~ ~:i- ~4. '~ ~ _ i -Yid `~ r .i.. . $.. ~ ~ ~' -. ~ ~~ pLt"' ... ~ }.. LTA. ~~, ~,~ '..~ ~. ~. /i- #e •-Wry ~T~~ .~ 4 ~~~~ rw. .,,. t-d ~~ « it r i -!~c ,'~ ~ ih ~~.' rr.-~ ,,~ c Vii' <'~ ~ :, 4 ~ ~4 y (- zl~`"-~.y,~'? ''/~ -`~~T'- ~r.F = t t, ~ _ _ ...,.~ h~ } ~ ~" """. ` r^" °~ri 1. - - ~;,_ .'~' ,; ~ `~ ~, r r ~~e It ~ '~ ~ y 3-i ~ .,y~, ~~ ~~~~ x ~ ~L ~ ,'~ t ~. r s i,_ ti ~ i~ ~ ~. x +n ~•~ Mr f ~~ Y rj w 7 '~ f..y~' ~ '~ ~' El 4 YI ~~ ~.,» ~~. ., Y+ ;sue , #*~~i .f `rr.3~'~~ j - '1. - ~x a i,, h ~ ~ t , ,z. .z'' ~_ _ x ;. r~,v sS~r''7'.' ~.se~':.rs' S ~ S {' ^` ~ ,t ^~~~ T f ~ ~{ f }r ~ ~ ~~ ~ t, '' r ~~- ` t` `~. ~ . ~~ ~`- `~N o y~~ i ~~ ~ .~h~ *~ ,ff j r A '~ ~', - i +~ .. :._~,.. _ p ~. M c~ w~~ >~ ~ G +v ,e Y ~ '+. ,t 1 r - ~~ ~ ~ , J~ ~ ~. 4: ~- ' `"'- *r ~ti ® 50 0 50 F0t?t ~ ~ This map was created by the Town of Vail GIS Departmem. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. 1 " - 75' The Town of Vail does not warrant the acwracy of the infonnalion conUined heroin. (parcel line work is approximate) J ~- •~ Joseph Shannon, LLC P.O. Box 3462 Vail, CO SI658 August 14, 2005 Town of Vail Council Members & Deparhnent of Community Development Hand Delivered Re: Safety Issue: request for covered entry Commercial Door #101 at the Mountain Haus Ladies and Gentlemen: Attached please find architectural drawings pertaining to the continuation of improvements to the west exterior of the Mountain Haus building for the commercial property known as Unit #101. The present situation is a safety and liability issue. The roof of the Mountain Haus does not have a large enough sofit or covered area over the exterior southwest entry door. Rain drip, falling ice and snow create a frozen and slippery walkway, which is hazardous to the general public. This request will remedy the safety issue and benefit the overall exterior aesthetics of the building in continuity of the improvements that were approved by 'the Town to the west entrance of the Mountain Haus in 1998. If you have any questions, please contact our contractor, Paul Smith. Thank you for your time regarding this matter. ~{,, . . S' cerely ours, __ ~::~• J , ,.. oseph annon, LLC By: Theresa W. Smith, General Partner Cc: PaulSmith Construction Warren Campbell, Community Development Planner ., i Attachment: B ' iAat. 5 °1~0, .. ~ ~ .. ~.r 1. t.. ... .. V, .~ ~~~=- ~.`.;`. -~` ; :`. ~'.:::Y, '~~~ .'I;:... .. . _ ~~ ~~PARTIAL 51TE'PLAN ~ 1:20 ~.FJi:~- ... ...... .. 0 • 10' 20" J40' SCALE: 1:20 ® >eme v < g iK uwt~c~~ . p4~.w. VAg, Inc. ~.~:~ ~.,.~,. 8 s I'-6~~ .... _-- : t~ov~~, ~I ~y g ~, ou. -rv~ pY- ~~ 15f - ~l~~k~s-~i-~ 1" _ ~ ~iµ~l~~ ~, ~~ -~~ ~.; ` ~ - -- ,;~, - t~ P-: PARTIAL FLDOR PLAN ~ I/4" 1'-0" _ ~ ^ ^ ^ o < ~~ {Y z~ ~~ r z'-a• L'"~ ~" nab. u~.uMty, ~ul~-,; ~,--~y - - _..._ ~-3-~--- Gcr~~~~r~` ~~bt1~ -rl~, ~/, i~c~ +'~s-s ~ t~.l.o~r~ ~ o O O ~~n~~,~T~ hl/ To. u, 'R~~-sC> Wo> ~5 ^ ^ ,° ~ ~ O. O ~ a ~~~~~4 ~~ ~~~~ °~aa Hasa 0 7' 4' 8' ~]~: - A2.1 . SGALE: '~i" 1'-0" ac ~ ]OOS v ~ y tie •.W~~cu . pw..~. ~~ -- VAg, Inc. .~. ~a s,o;.~,.,m. ...nom. ~~....__ ~~~~ a FRONT ELEVATION. va^ .,r.-m.. m z' a' a~ SCALE: ~~. ~~ 1'-0° g ,mp r . g ,e ..wue~ ~ pYnr, t~.1 ~ ~ { ~,; ~ * ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ < k ,~ ~ ~ ~: -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: t~ ~ ~~ ^, , ' !` ~ ~ Sri ~ -~ ~ ~~ fi,+ _ ~"{ ~ ~ ;~ r 't. ~. 1 4,f^T~ #~ f irk. 1 ~,l`. y y ~~~ 4 `~ ~ ~~ 1 L ,~ h~; f r' .k 1' 0. h J _ "~. .{ . ~ t ~ ~~, t ~. `t~ ~ r _ ~ e ~~zr!'~r e t ~. ~~ Page 1 of 1 oft _ ~ ~~ ~;< ~~~ s~ :.~ ~_ ~ ~1 3 Y-~ t ~-at t~~ - {f{' ' lr f. _ 'y_~. ~' ~~~~~ , ;~ ` ~ i Page 1 of 1 ~ = ::~. , ~..: _~. .' ~ Qr ~ ~ ~e~c ~. o r ~i ~h~C ~~ 1,2 Page 1 of 1 ,~ .,~ ~a .. :. f . ~: ,s.,, ..~i~, fi1P.'//C'.'\T)ncnmPnts~/7(lanr~~/7(1CPttinac\Panlo/7(1Qmith\T nralo/7(LCPtFinac\Tamnnrarvo/7 7/17/7(1(15 MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Zemler FROM: Bill Carlson, Environmental Health Officer/Planner DATE: September 15, 2005 SUBJECT: Town of Vail Forest Health Project: Pine Beetle Mitigation on Upper Bench of Donovan Park PROJECT STATUS Work is underway on the upper bench of Donovan Park to create defensible space and mitigate pine beetle infestation in the area. The project is part of the Town of Vail Forest Health Project and the Town of Vail in cooperation with U.S. Forest Service, Vail Fire Department, Vail Community Development and Eagle County are working on 29 acres of town-owned land to mitigate pine beetle infested or dead trees, reduce wildfire fuels to create defensible space and rejuvenate and diversify the forest. This is the first of many pine beetle mitigation projects planned to help reduce wildfire fuels, enhance aspen tree stands, rejuvenate and create vegetative diversity in the forest. The following is an update of project activities to date: • The Juniper Valley wildfire crew (15-20 men) has begun cutting dead, diseased and live aspen stands in the upper bench of Donovan Park. The majority of the down trees will be piled for a controlled prescribed burn to be scheduled late this fall when conditions are optimal for opening burning. The prescribed burn will be supervised by the U.S. Forest Service and paid for out of the Town of Vail project budget. • Pine Martin Logging, a logging company owned and operated by Tom Olden, is scheduled to begin cutting approximately 800 beetle infested and dead lodgepole pine trees on Monday, Sept. 19. These downed trees will be hauled out of the area, while the remaining lash (limbs & tops) will be piled for a prescribed burning by the Juniper Valley wildfire crew. • Small access trails will be needed for skidding of logs for off site removal. Upon completion, the area will be fully re-vegetated through seeding and contouring. • The project is scheduled for completion by Oct 4. II. BUDGET Approximately $55,000 from the Public Work's beetle mitigation budget and $50,000 from the Town of Vail RETT fund is budgeted for this project. The project will not exceed $105,000. ~nwxo~vn¢ JULY 2005 VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW September 13, 2005 Overall July sales tax increased 2.2% with Retail increasing 1.9%, Lodging increased 2.2%, Food and Beverage increased .7°Io and Utilities/Other (which is mainly utilities but also includes taxable services and rentals) increased 7.4°Io. Town of Vail sales tax forms, the Vail Business Review and the sales tax worksheet are available on the Internet at www.vailgov.com. You can subscribe to have the Vail Business Review and the sales tax worksheet e-mailed to you automatically from www.vail ov.com. Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax collections, as opposed to actual gross sales. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125. Sincerely, n n `~~ ~C.~L.~ Sally Lorton Sales Tax Administrator July 2005 SALES TAX VA/L VILLAGE July July July 2004 2005 /1_n__ae w_^^_ Retail Lodging. Food & Beverage Other Total v~~~~~~iv~~~ ~.v~~CCUC~ns ~,nange 200,294 211,900 5.8% 107,072 108;943 1.7% 207,972 221,522 6.5% 8,068; 7,650 ..., -5.2% 523,406 550,015 5.1 LIONSHEAD July July July 2004 2005 Collections Collections Chanc Retai I 51,134;' Lodging 82,224 Food & Beverage 54,800 Other 4,225 Total 192,383 35,4.13 -30.7% 7&,717 -4.3% 44,659 -18.5% 5,334. 26.2% 164,123 -14.7% _. ~, July 2005 SALES TAX CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIUSANDSTONE/WEST VAIL July July July 2004 2005 Retail Lodging Food & Beverage Other Total ~.viiectivns t.viieciivns t,nan e ~ t ~ 141,984 1{47,578 ,~ ~ ~-3e 9 ° h ~ ~`~ x jjyy ~, ~q ~... ~ CA , ,~ ~ ' tl ~, C $ 5~7 836 ~ 65 025 . ~1~2~~4%" ' ,, : ,~ ~ , ~ I F ry ~,d1"~.y , $ ~'r.~ ~Cr~jtTy+ ~~ ,.F 60,201 ~ 58,012r ~ ~ 3~6% i w ~ ~ ~ / '~" 3 ' ~ . y. fr. ~Y. ~ 6 288 _ ~ 4 949, ~ ~. 21 3%a s 26fi309~., ~ j ' ' 275,564` 3 5%a OUT OF TOWN Retail Lodging Food & Beverage Utilities & Other Total July July July 2004 2005 Collections Collections Change 37,158 43,760 4: ~ 1.7 ~8% 1,594 1,591 -0 2% 878 1,851 ` 1 f0`8% s~.~ 106,794 11.6,706 ~ ~ 9 3,% .. 146,424 163,908 Ju1y2005 SALES TAX TOTAL July July July 2004 2005 A_~~_ .l! A _ ^^ _ Retai I Lodging Food & Beverage Utilities & Other Total ~.~,~~c~~~~~~~ ~..vi~CC:uur~s ~.nan e 430,570 438,651 1.9% 248,726 2..54,_276; 2.2% 323,851 326,044 0.7% ..125,375 .134.,639 7.4% 1,128,522 1,153,610 2.2% / RETAIL SUMMARY July 2004 Collections July 2005 Collections July % Change FOOD 116,158 125,699 8.2% LIQUOR 23,769 24,033 1.1% APPAREL 69,826 69,458 -.5% SPORT 81,717 88,450 8.2% JEWELRY 36,625 28,447 -22.3% GIFT 13,997 13,565 -3.1 % GALLERY 5,331 6,395 20.0% OTHER 82,169 81,880 -.4% HOME 978 724 -26.0% OCCUPATION TOTAL 430,570 438,651 1.9% MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: September 12, 2005 SUBJECT: A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Sections 12-7H-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H- 2, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement or Garden Level, and 12- _ 7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor on Street Level, Vail Town Code, to allow for the development of 106 multi-family residential dwelling units, located at 728 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 2, West' Day Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto (PEC 05-0062 and PEC 05-0063). Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, .represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: .Warren Campbell I. SUMMARY The purpose of today's work session hearing with the Planning and Environmental Commission is to allow the applicant an opportunity to present the major exterior alteration application for the proposed Ritz-Carlton Residences and to respond to questions from the previous meeting. The desired outcome of the hearing is for the Planning and Environmental Commission to understand the following: . The proposed structure in terms of bulk, mass, height, and operation. The criteria by which the applicant is requesting flexibility regarding the area of flat roof on the structure, the screening element over the mechanicals located on the main ridge, and the ptroposed landmark ~~.. tower. -~, f The Commission is not being asked to take any formal action on this application at this time. As such, staff is not providing a formal recommendation at this time. Staff and the applicant request that the Planning and Environmental Commission tables the applicant's request to the September 26, 2005, hearing. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The purpose of today's work session hearing with the Planning and Environmental Commission is to allow the applicant an opportunity to present the major exterior alteration application for the proposed Ritz-Carlton Residences and to respond to questions from the previous meeting. After the presentation the Planning and Environmental Commission will be asked to provide initial feedback regarding the proposal. The proposed Ritz-Carlton Residences project is on the third and final parcel of the comprehensive development site encompassing the existing Marriott Hotel, the Gore Creek Residences, and the West Day Lot parking area. The West Day Lot parking area and the existing Marriott parking structure sites total 2.399 acres in size and is proposed to be the location of the Ritz-Carlton Residences project. A vicinity map identifying the location of the development site has been attached for reference (Attachment A). A description of the project provided by the applicant is attached for reference (Attachment B). A reduced set of plans dated September 7, 2005, are attached for reference (Attachment C). The Ritz-Carlton Residences proposal is comprised of two (2) different development review applications. Each application is intended to facilitate the redevelopment proposal. The development applications include: A major exterior alteration application for a new 104 multiple- familydwelling unit structure; and . A conditional use permit for "lodge rooms or dwelling units" located on the basement or garden level and the first floor or street level of the structure. The key elements of the proposal include: • A 104 multiple-family dwelling unit condominium structure; • A total of 214,134 square feet of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA); • A 388 space below grade parking structure below grade to serve as parking for the Marriott Hotel and the Ritz-Carlton Residences; • A landmark feature which is 140 feet in height; • A loading and delivery facility comprised of three bays; • A lobby/lounge area with a front desk, concierge, and valet; and • A media room, game room, and pool/hot tub deck. III. BACKGROUND The subject development site includes several parcels of land currently used for the Marriott Hotel, the parking structure for the Marriott Hotel, the Gore Creek Residences, and the West Day Lot. ~~ . .:*~: s Marriott Hotel History (Parcel 1 of the West Day Subdivison) The Marriott (previously "The Mark") was approved by the Town in 1977 as a hotel and condominium project and was zoned Special Development District No. 7 by Ordinance 3, Series of 1977. The project was expanded and modified throughout the 1980's and 1990's. In 1999 the Marriott property, along with the rest of Lionshead, was rezoned to Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and SDD No. 7 was repealed. The Marriott as developed today includes 35 dwelling units, 276 hotel rooms, meeting rooms, a restaurant, and other hotel amenities. 2 West Day Lot History (Parcel 2 of the West Day Subdivision) The western portion of the site (the Morcus Subdivision), known as the "West Day Lot", was regraded and used for Vail Resorts employee parking. Prior to the rezoning of this parcel to Lionshead Mixed Use 1 in 1999, the property was zoned Parking District. On August 22, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission held an initial hearing on the Ritz-Carlton Residences. At that hearing Staff proved the Commission with parameters by which the project would be reviewed. At this hearing the Commission requested to see how the parcels recently acquired by Vail Associates and the potential of relocating the Frontage Road would affect this property. In addition the Commission asked for a response as to why a conditional use permit was appropriate to be granted for condominiums on the ground floor next to a potential future lift and within an overall greater portal to the mountain being created in western Lionshead. Gore Creek Residences History (Parcel 3 of the West Day Subdivision): On November 24, 2003, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved text amendments to Section. 12-7H-5, Conditional Uses; Generally (on all levels of a building or outside a building), Vail Town Code, to allow single-family residential dwellings and two-family residential dwellings as conditional uses in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District and Section 12-16-7, Use Specific Criteria and Standards, Vail Town Code, to provide criteria to which asingle-family and two-family residential dwelling proposal within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District must adhere. The text amendments were subsequently approved by Town Council upon second reading in Ordinance 36, Series of 2003, on December 16, 2003. On June 28, 2004, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved, with conditions, a conditional use permit and a major exterior alteration application on this site for eight two-family structures for a total of 16 dwelling units. s On December 13, 2004, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a;minor subdivision establishing the West ~ Day Subdivision (Attachment D) which is comprised of three parcels. -The approval and recording of the West Day Subdivision was the culmination of the review of the Gore Creek residences during which it was agreed that the three lots comprising the West Day Subdivision would be tied .together for zoning purposes. A note was placed upon the West Day Subdivision which states the following: "For the purposes of zoning, Lots 1, 2, and 3, created by this subdivision are to be treated as one development .site. Development standards shall be based upon the improvements and land area of the combined area of Lots 1, 2, and 3." As a part of the approval of the West Day Subdivision, a spreadsheet identifying the development potential for each of the three parcels was approved in conjunction with the minor subdivision. That spreadsheet, entitled, "West Day Lot/Marriott Hotel/Gore Creek Place Approved Development Plan/Development Allocations", and dated December 6, 2004, is attached for reference (Attachment E). IV. ROLES OF THE REVIEWING BOARDS The purpose of this section of the memorandum is to clarify the responsibilities of the Design Review Board, Planning and Environmental Commission, Town Council, and Staff on the various applications submitted on behalf of Vail Resorts Development Company. A. Exterior Alteration/Modification in the Lionshead Mixed-Use I zone district Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning and Environmental Commission for impacts of use/development and then by the Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval/denial of a Major/Minor Exterior Alteration. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the proposal for compliance with the adopted criteria. The Planning and Environmental Commission's approval "shall constitute approval of the basic form and location of improvements including siting, building setbacks, height, building bulk and mass, site improvements and landscaping." Design Review Board: Action: The Design Review Board has no review authority on a Major or Minor Exterior Alteration, but must review any accompanying Design Review Board application. Staff.• The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as'.to compliance. with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Towri Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approval`s 4 or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. B. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then by the Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for firial approval/denial of CUP. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the request for compliance with the adopted conditional use permit criteria and make findings of fact with regard tp the project's compliance. Design Review Board: Action: The Design Review Board has no review authority on a CUP, but must review any accompanying Design Review Board application. Staff.• The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. Town Council: Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. ~'~~~ ~,. V. ~ APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS ' ,~ The following checklist was created. to provide a means of evaluating the Ritz- Carlton Residences proposal for compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The checklist is intended for the Planning and Environmental Commission to use in conjunction with their copies of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan to located relevant portions of the Master Plan which pertain to this proposal. 5 Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Chapter 2: Introduction ^ 2.1 Purpose of the Master Plan ^ 2.2 Definition of a Master Plan ^ 2.3 Policy Objectives ^ 2.3.1 Renewal and Redevelopment ^ 2.3.2 Vitality and Amenities ^ 2.3.3 Stronger Economic Base Through Increased Live Beds ^ 2.3.4 Improved Access and Circulation ^ 2.3.5 Improved Infrastructure ^ 2.3.6 Creative Financing for Enhanced Private Profits and Public Revenues Chapter 4: Master Plan Recommendations -Overall study Area ^ 4.1 Underlying Physical Framework of Lionshead ^ 4.1.1 Lionshead Master Plan Concept ^ 4:1.5 West Lionshead -Residential/Mixed-Use Hub ^ 4.3 Connections to the Natural Environment 0 4.3.1 Visual Connections ^ 4.3.1.2 North-South Orientation.of Buildings ^ 4.6 Vehicular and Pedestrian Circulation ^ 4.6.4 Modifications to West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place ^ 4.6.4.1 East Intersection of W. Lionshead Circle and South Frontage Road ^ 4.6.4.2 Intersection of Lionshead Place and West Lionshead Circle ^ ~ 4.6.4.3 Pedestrian Sidewalks and Crossings ^ 4.6'.4.4 Visual Improvements ~`~ .«,~. ^ 4.7 Loading and Delivery '~ ^ 4.7.1 Properties with Direct Service Access ^ 4.8 Parking , ^ 4.8.1 Potential Displacement of Existing Parking ^ 4.8.1.2 West Day Lot ^ 4.8.2 Residential Properties ^ 4.9 Housing, ^ 4.9.1 No Net Loss of Employee Housing ^ 4.9.3 Policy Based Housing Opportunities ^ 4.10 Gateway, Landmarks, and Portals 6 ^ 4.10.2 Landmarks ^ 4.11 Public Art Chapter 5, Detailed Plan Recommendations ^ 5.13 The Marriott ^ 5.13.1 Redevelopment or Development of the Parking Structure 0 5.17 West Day Lot/ Vail Associates Service Yard/ Holy Cross- Site Chapter 6, Site Design Guidelines ^ 6.4 Secondary Pedestrian Walk ^ 6.6 Pedestrian Path Chapter 8, Architectural Design Guidelines ^ 8.1 Vision Statement ^ 8.2 Organization, Purpose and Scope ^ 8.4.2 Architecture ^ 8.4.2.11ntroduction ^ 8.4.2.2 Building Form and Massing ^ 8.4.2.3 Building Height ^ 8.4.2.4 Exterior Walls . ^ 8.4.2.7 Roofs Resolution 18: Series of 2004: A Resolution Amending Certain Sections Of The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Clarifying And Affording ALL Types Of Development Projects. "New And Redevelopment'; Flexibility In The Application Of The Architectural Design Guidelines. As Prescribed In Chapter 8 Of The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. And Setting Forth Details In Regard Thereto. 8.3.3.A Review Criteria for Deviations to the Architectural De~g~ Guidelines.for New Development .. Similar to the implementation policies of the ADG prescribed for existing structures, the Town has determined that there may be instances where flexibility in ~ requiring strict compliance with the Guidelines for new development maybe in the best interest of the community and the furtherance of the goals and objectives slated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. That said, however, it is acknowledged that such instances are rare and extraordinary, and shall be considered on a case-by--case basis. To aid in determining when flexibility shall be afforded to new development from strict compliance with the Guidelines, review criteria have been established. The degree of design deviation flexibility afforded to a.deve/opment project shall bear proportionately fo the extent of the improvements proposed. For example, a development 7 application that proposes the construction of a new structure which includes the demolition of an existing structure or adds significant volume or mass to a property, shall more fully comply with the prescribed Architectural Design Guidelines outlined in the master plan than an application which proposes a renovation or addition to an existing building The following criteria shall be used by the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission and Design Review Board to determine if deviations to the Guidelines should be granted: It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission following a recommendation from the Design Review Board that: • The request for design deviations are in compliance with the purposes of the zone district; and • The proposal which includes the design deviations is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; and • The proposal which includes the design deviations does not have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood; and • The proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan; and • The design deviation meets or exceeds the intent of the specific design standards as prescribed in Section 8.4; and, A public benefif is achieved as a result of the design deviation; and, • The design deviation furthers the goals, objectives and purposes as stated in Sections 2.3, 2.5 and 8.2 of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Zoning Regulations Lionshead Mixed Use -1 Zone District (in part) 12-7H-1: PURPOSE: ~~. :_~; The Lionshead Mixed Use-1 zone district is intended to provide sites, for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, time shares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and .to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. This District is meant to encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. 8 This Zone District was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop. The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create an economically vibrant lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The incentives in this Zone District include increases in allowable gross residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the .incentives is fo create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consisfent with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help finance public off-site improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. With any development/redevelopment proposal taking advantage of the incentives created herein, the following amenities will be evaluated: , streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements. 12-7H-2: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; BASEMENT OR GARDEN LEVEL: A. Definition: The "basement" or "garden level" shall be defined as that floor of a building that is entirely or substantially below grade. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure: Banks and financial institutions. Commercial ski storage. Eating and drinking establishments. Personal services and repair shops. Professional offices, business offices and studios. Public or private lockers and storage. Recreation facilities. Retail establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels within a structure, subject to issuance of#"~~ conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Conference facilities and meeting rooms. ` Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Major arcade. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, time-share .units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type 111 (EHU) as provided in Chapter 13 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Theaters. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 9 12-7H-3: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building thaf is located at grade or street level along a pedestrianway. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level within a structure: ' Banks, with walk-up teller facilities. Eating and drinking establishments. Recreation facilities. Retail stores and establishments. Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare. Travel agencies. Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 72-3- 4 of this Title. C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level floor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title: Barbershops, beauty shops and'beauty parlors. Conference facilities and meeting rooms. Financial institutions, other than banks. Liquor stores. Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, time-share units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type 111 (EHU) as provided in Chapter 13 of this Title). Radio, TV stores, and repair shops. Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Title. 12-7H-4: PERMITTED AND. CONDITIONAL USES; SECON~ID FLOOR AND ABOVE: .~ A. Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on' those floors above the first floor within a structure: Lodges and accommodation units. Multiple-family residential dwelling units, time-share units, fractional fee clubs, lodge dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type 111(EHU) as provided in Chapter 13 of this Title). Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3- 4 of this Title. ' 10 12-7H-6: ACCESSORY USES: The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use zone district: Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Title. Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to permitted and conditional uses. Minor arcade. Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses. Outdoor dining areas .operated in conjunction with permitted eating and drinking establishments. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential or lodge uses. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 12-.7H-8: COMPLIANCE BURDEN: It shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed exferior alteration or new development is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements ~ of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and that ,the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal. substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail . comprehensive plan. ' 12-7H-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS: Property. owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts of their development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation shall bear a reasonable relation to the development impacts. Impacts may be determined based on reports prepared by qualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public amenity improvements shall be balanced with the goals of redevelopment and will be determined by the planning and environmental commission in review of development projects and conditional use permits. Mitigation of impacts may, include, but is not limited to, the~'following: roadway improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, stream tracbbank improvements, public 'art improvements, and ,,similar improvements. The intent of this section is to only require mitigation for large scale redeve/opment/deve/opment projects which produce substantial off site impacts. , VI. .ZONING ANALYSIS Address/Legal Description: Parcel Size: Zoning: Land Use Designation: 720 and 728, West Lionshead Circle, and 825 West Forest Road/Lots 1, 2, 3, West Day Subdivision 6.82 acre (297,165 sq. ft.) Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Resort Accommodations and Services .' 11 The West Day Lot Development is comprised of three parcels which include the existing Marriott Hotel and the 16 Gore Creek Place Residences, and the . proposed Ritz-Carlton Residences. As was stated previously in the memorandum these three parcels are tied together. and treated as one large development site by the recorded plat. Below is a zoning analysis which incorporates all three parcels and the developments which exist, are under construction, and are proposed on the three lots. This analysis will become a part of the Approved Development Plan for the three parcels included within the West Day Lot Development Site. Development Standard Allowed Existing Proposed Land Uses: Lot 1 - Marriot Hotel Lot 2 -West Day Lot and Marriott Hotel Parking Structure Lot 3 -Gore Creek Residences Lot Area: 10,000 sq. ft. 297,165 sq. ft. 297,165 sq. ft. Setbacks All Sides: Building Height: Density: GRFA: Site Coverage: 10 ft. 71 ft. avg. 82.5 ft, max 238 DUs (35/ac.) 51 DU (7.5/ac.) Unlimited AUs 276 AU 742,912 sq. ft. 208,015 sq. ft. (70%) 213,239 sq. ft. 148,076 sq. ft. (49.8%) 10 ft. 70 ft. avg. 80.5 ft. max 10 ft. 67.9 ft. avg. 82.5 ft. max 155 DU (22.7/ac.) 276 AU 427,373 sq. ft. 203,234 sq. ft. (68.4%) Landscape Area: 59,433 sq. ft. (20%) 139,713 sq. ft. (41 %) 119,772sq. ft. (40.3%) Parking: 156 (1.4/DU) 412 spaces 498 spaces 276 (0.7/AU) The following analysis is performed solely on the site proposed to be the location of the Ritz-Carlton Residences. ~,, Address/Legal Description: 728 West Lionshead Circle%Lot 2 West Day Subdivision Parcel Size: 2.399 acre (104,500 sq. ft.) Zoning: Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Land Use Designation: Resort Accommodations and Services .Development Standard Allowed Existing. Land Uses: Lot 2 -West Day Lot and Marriott Hotel Parking Structure Lot Area: Setbacks All Sides: 10,000 sq. ft. 10 ft. 12 104,500 sq. ft. NA Proposed 104,500 sq. ft. 10 ft. Building Height: 71 ft. avg. NA 65.9 ft. avg. 82.5 ft. max 82.5 ft. max Density: 83 DUs (35/ac.) NA 104 DU (43.4/ac.) Unlimited AUs GRFA: 261,250 sq. ft. NA 214,134 sq. ft. Site Coverage: 73,150 sq. ft. NA 77,760 sq. ft. (70%) (74.4%) Landscape Area: 20,900 sq. ft. (20%) , NA 25,060sq. ft. (23.9%) Parking: 145.6 (1.4/DU) NA 388 spaces* '` Of the parking proposed to be provided 146 spaces will serve the Ritz-Carlton Residences, 237 will serve as replacement spaces fort he Marriott Hotel to replace the structure, and 5 are surplus. VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use North: Residential South: Open Space East: Residential West: Public`Utility Zoning Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District Natural Area Preservation District Lionshead Mixed Use 1 .District General Use District VIII. MAJOR EXTERIOR ALTERATION REVIEW CRITERIA Section- 12-7H-8, Compliance Burden, Vail Town Code, outlines the review criteria for major exterior alteration applications proposed within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 (LMU-1) zone district. According to Section 12-7H-8, Vail Town Code, a major exterior. alteration shall be .reviewed for compliance with the . following criteria: 1. That the proposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district; ;,. ,..~, ,; 2. That the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; ~~ 3. That the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood; and, 4. That the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the major exterior alteration application, staff recommends that the Commission makes the following finding as part of the motion: 13 "Pursuant to Section 12-7H-8, Compliance Burden, Vail Town Code, the applicant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan." IX. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA As previously discussed in Section II of this memorandum, the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7H-2, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Basement or .Garden Level, and 12-7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor on Street Level, to construct dwelling units within the Garden Level and on the First Floor of the proposed structure, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the, provisions outlined in Chapter 16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail Town Code. Section 12-16-6, Criteria; Findings, Vail Town Code, outlines the review. criteria for conditional uses permit requests proposed within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 (l_MU-1) zone district. According to Section 12-16-6, Vail Town Code, the Plarning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference. to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking- areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the pro~~sed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed ~'iase in relation to surrounding uses. ~-. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the application, staff recommends that the Commission make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public 14 health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Regulations. X. RESOLUTION 18, SERIES OF 2004, REVIEW CRITERIA The applicant is requesting three architectural design deviations which are permitted flexibility under the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and are subject to review by the Planning and Environmental Commission under a set of criteria. If certain findings can be made by the Planning and Environmental Commission, upon receipt of a recommendation by the Design Review Board, flexibility can be granted. The three architectural design features the applicant is requesting flexibility from are: 1. The Master Plan limitation on a maximum of 500 sq. ft. of flat roofed areas; 2. The Master Plan requirements for screening of mechanical equipment by proposing a screening feature which exceeds the 82.5 foot height limitation; and 3. The Master Plan requirements for an architectural landmark which is 140 feet tall. Staff will not address the specific criteria at this time regarding the three architectural design elements the applicant is requesting to deviate from in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Staff's initial analysis regarding the three architectural design deviations are as follows: 1. Flat Roofed Area of the Structure: The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan identifies a maximum area of 500 square feet for flat roofed portions of a structure. Staff believes that the intent of this provision is to limit buildings to minimal flat roofed areas so as to encourage true sloping roof forms. Staff believes that the limitation of 500 square feet for a structure~~ocated on a site encompassing 2.399. acres may be unreasonable:* The proposed structure has a total roof area of approximately 60,438 square feet and the proposed flat roofed portion of the structure is proposed'~to be approximately 9,100 square feet or 15 percent. The applicant has proposed a roof design in which they believe the flat portion is secondary to the sloped ~ roofed areas. Through the use of sloped mansard roof forms the applicant has attempted to reduce the visibility of the flat roofed portions of the structure from many perspectives. From a pedestrian perspective the flat roofed areas will not be visible nor from the surround properties as the height of the building is above a majority of the windows in the neighboring structures. The flat roofed areas will be visible from the ski mountain. 15 2. Mechanical Screening Solution: The applicant has proposed a solution to screen several large cooling towers and condensers on the main ridge of the structure located above the port-cochere. The applicant has proposed to place a screening solution over the mechanicals which would continue the roof line of the main ridge up to a height which ranges from 91 feet on the north elevation of the building to 96.5_ feet on the south elevation of the building. The proposed solution exceeds the master Plan identified maximum height of 82,5 feet in height. The Master Plans identifies that mechanicals should be placed on roof tops and painted so as to blend into the roof color materials. The proposed structure has :placed the several large mechanical pieces in a well on the roof, which has a finished floor elevation less than 82.5 feet, and placed the screening element on top. The screening element is proposed to be an element which would be an architectural element which is custom created-from metal and would be primarily open. This can be visualized best by looking at the cross section on sheet A301 in the set of reduced plans. 3. Landmark Tower Element: The applicant has proposed to locate a landmark tower element on the northwest corner of the proposed structure. The Master Plan identifies the importance of landmark elements on projects within Section 8.4.1.2, Landmarks. The specific language in the Master Plan is as follows: A landmark provides a sense of orientation for the community, and reinforces its "sense of place" or image. As such, it must be visible from key locations within the community, such as portals. and major public spaces, and must offer an image consistent with Lionshead. As a unique architectural element, a landmark should be designed to clearly stand out from the rest of the community, while still presenting a consistent design language. Care should be taken to provide a clear hierarchy between the village landmark and other, secondary landmarks: Landmarks are most successful when they serve special functions such as bell towers, clock towers, monuments, or public art, rather than `bung self-serving. Furthermore, they should be carefully scalec~'~-to the buildings i adjacent to them, as well as to the overall scale of the urban village. ~` Title 14 of the Town of Vail Zoning Code states that: Towers, spires, cupoloas, chimneys, flagpoles, and similar architectural features not useable as habitable floor area may extend above the height limit a distance of not more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the height limit nor more than fifteen feet (75). 16 The proposed tower has a height of 140 feet, measures approximately 25 feet by 25 feet, and is located in close proximity to the intersection of the South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle. The proposed architectural landmark tower does not contain any GRFA above the maximum height of 82.5 feet in height. Currently the feature is anticipated to be illuminated. from the exterior with up lighting. At a height of 140 feet the proposed tower is 57.5 feet (69%) taller than the maximum height identified in the Master Plan. The Planning nad Environmental Commission does have the authority within the Master Plan in conjunction with the criteria found in Resolution 18, series of 2004, to allow for an architectural feature as proposed the findings found below are made. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Town of Vaii Planning & Environmental Commission following a recommendation from the Design Review Board that: The request for design deviations are in compliance with the purposes of the zone district; and 2. The proposal which includes the design deviations is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; and 3. The proposal which includes the design deviations does not have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood; and 4. The proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan; and 5. The design deviation meets or exceeds the intent of the specific design standards as prescribed in Section 8.4; and, ~~ .~ 6. A public benefit is achieved as a result of the design deviation; and, ~~. 7. The design deviation furthers the goals, objectives and purposes as stated in Sections 2.3, 2.5 and 8.2 of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the application, staff recommends that the Commission make the following findings before granting a flexibility under the recommendations of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan: 1. That the request for design deviations are in compliance with the purposes of the zone district; and 17 2. That the proposal which includes the design deviations is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; and . 3. That the proposal which includes the design deviations does not have a significant negative effect on the character of the neighborhood; and 4. That the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan; and 5. That the design deviation meets or exceeds the intent of the specific design standards as prescribed in Section 8.4; and, 6. That a public benefit is achieved as a result of the design deviation; and, 7. That the design deviation furthers the goals, objectives and purposes as stated in Sections 2.3, 2.5 and 8.2 of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. XI. NEXT STEPS :.The following is a tentative schedule of hearings dates at which the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) will be asked to review, comment, and .take action on the proposed .Ritz-Carlton Residences: • .PEC September 26, 2005: Applicant and Staff response to previous PEC comments. No formal action requested • DRB September 21, 20.05: Introduction to the project by the applicant and Staff. The DRB will be asked to provide initial comments. No formal action requested. • DRB October 19, 2005: Applicant and Staff response to previous DRB comments. No formal action requested. ,, • PEC October 24,.2005: Request for final review and approval of the project by the applicant and Staff if all ,comments and concerns have been addressed. • DRB November 16, 2005: Request for final review and approval of the project by the applicant and Staff if all comments and concerns have been addressed. XII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff and the applicant would request that the Planning and Environmental Commission table the applicant's request to the September 26, 2005, hearing. 18 XIII. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A :Vicinity Map Attachment B: Description of Proposal Provided by the Applicant Attachment C: Reduced copy of the proposed plans dated September 7, 2005 Attachment D: West Day Subdivision plat Attachment E: West Day Lot/Marriott Hotel/Gore Creek Place Approved Development Plan spreadsheet dated December 6, 2004 s .. 19 ,. - ~.~-__ ~ _ - .~ - -~ ..L-_. , _ , .,,~ `__, ` ~ The Ritz-Carlton Residences ~~ ~-~ ~- -Request for a Major .Exterior Alteration and Conditional_,Use Permit - . , 728 West Lionshead Circle -= ~.' ~~ .~r ~ - Planning :and Environmental Commission ~ -.September 12, 20..05 - :~- '~ - r ~ ~ ~: ~-z~;,~~ ~ ~ --~ --- - _-- it ~ n, - J li~'~i 1~~~,, ~,it F~_ ~~~_ ~ "'i .''r3 }*,` ~a ~~ ~~~~ '~~*~ _ ~I~ r~'~ _: ~ _ is r ,.+ ~ ~ ~ti+x ~~ r.,.., s, ,, V 1~ ; ~` ~ `~ i a •~i ~r• `~- ~ t, •~ - ~l ` ~~ ~~ t n +r ` ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ Xqk ~ ~~~~~~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ 1 r ~~ ~~J r~ w ,,~ F ~ _.~ /'`~+/£~ 1 ~F I~f~ ll ~i ~ t n ; ~a ~ r ` ~ ~~, ,~ _ .~ ,. .,. . , .~ ,. R ~ ~F~`,~ \ Ritz-Carlton Re~s~ nces' `5~ i~ ? '`~i~~ ~ . ~, .y.: -~--I _. ~~ ~~ ~~ . ~4~'>_~I r ~S' f ~, ~ Pig`" t ~ F a°~ ~ ~~4 ~. ;~ ~ I ' ~~' z ~ r ~ / ~. ~,. '< ~ IYt r~,~'1 r ~! 'tiii~T" * ~._ `\-. ~ '1Ml~j ~` ~,~ l ~ --fir" I`ti+ , f--!. ~"'°" R ~ -' ,~.. ~ 1 p~ .. - ~c ~ ,~~~ N~ _ .~, ~'~ ~ ~ s-- ,riff. ~ .t ,~' { S,I ,, F ,~}{ r _ ~l r: u .. ., ~. p~~P t -t ~ / ~ 1 100 0 100 Feet r 1 ~~ 2OOf West Day Sub. 7 ) X !y ¢ ~ ~ -~~~~ ~~w ~~lt ~ f , ~ ~~ ~ x l ~ r;, ~~ ~ V ~~. ~4~ 2 E L ~~.:. r '` -.~ 1* This map was created by the Town of Vail GIS Department. Use of this map should be for generel purposes only. . The Town of Vail does not warram the accuracy of the information wntained herein. (parcel line work is ePProxlma~e) Ritz-Carlton Residences at Vail Project Summary The development of the Ritz-Carlton Residences (RCR) on Parcel 3 of the West Day Lot involves the review of an Exterior Alteration and a Conditional Use Permit. The following provides a summary of the project and a description of how the proposal complies with applicable review criteria and with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. This application represents an addendum to a comprehensive Lionshead Redevelopment application submitted to the Town of Vail on July 7, 2003. That application included plans for the Tennis Court site, the Core Site, the North Day Lot and the West Day Lot. Since that time the Tennis Court site has been completed and the Core site construction is underway. A subdivision of the West Day Lot has been completed and construction of a portion of the project (Gore Creek Place) is also underway. While modifications are proposed to the development program, this amended development application is consistent with the development plans set forth for the West Day Lot in the July 2003 application. The following summarizes major elements of the project. It is acknowledged that some of these factors will be revised as the project design is refined during the town's review process. Description of the Ritz-Carlton Residences The development of the RCR is a collaborative effort between Vail Resorts and the Ritz- Carlton. The project includes 106 multi-family dwelling units, the. vast majority of which are two and three bedroom units. The building has been designed in response to the neighboring Marriott Hotel and Gore Creek Place. As proposed, the building frames both the West Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle and is designed around a large pool/plaza area in the center of the project. The RCR will include a wide variety of on-site amenities typically associated with a fine hotel. For example, a large lobby and lounge area will greet visitors upon entering the building. Concierge service will be provided by the Ritz-Carlton to both owners.and occupants of the units. A bar, library room, fitness center, billiard room and media center are also included in plans for the RCR. While the building will be managed by the Ritz-Carlton, short-term rentals will be handled by Vail Resorts. Rentals will be handled from either the Arrabelle front Desk or from the adjacent Marriott Hotel. With all the amenities of a hotel and given the relatively small size of units (predominantly 2-3 bedroom) it is anticipated that many owners will make their units available for short-term rentals. Ritz Carlton Club Vail Resorts/West Day Lot Attachment: B Existing Conditions The RCR is located on Lot 2 of the West Day Lot Subdivision. The West Day Lot Subdivision was done in 2004 for the purpose of consolidating a number of lots and parcels made up the Marriott property and the West Day Lot. This subdivision created three lots -the Marriott Hotel is .located on Lot 1, the Gore Creek Place project is located on Lot 3 and Lot 2 is the remaining portion of what has historically been referred to as the West Day Lot. Lot 2 is 2.399 acres in size. Lot 2 (and•the West Day Lot) has historically been used for parking. A structured parking lot utilized by the Marriott Hotel is located on the eastern end of the lot. For the past two ski seasons the Town of Vail has operated apay-day skier parking lot on remaining portions of Lot 2. Prior to day-skier parking the lot was used by Vail Resorts employees. In order to allow for the day-skier parking Vail Resort employee parking was moved to the Maintenance Yard and Holy Cross site. Lionshead Mixed Use I Zoning The following summarizes how the proposal conforms to relevant zoning standards of the LHMU zone district: Uses Proposed uses for the. RCR include multi-family dwelling units, eating and drinking . establishments, recreation facilities and other accessory uses. All of these uses are allowable as either a permitted use or with approval of a conditional use permit. Uses that require a conditional use permit include multi-family dwelling units on first (see response to CUP criteria below). '~~ Setbacks The proposed building conforms to the required 10' setback along Forest Road, South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle. The 10' setback on the south and east sides of the building do not apply as these are interior lots lines (as established by the West Day Lot Plat, for zoning purposes the three lots created by this plat are,to be treated as one lot). ~k.. ~: Building Height .,, Building height calculations are provided in the plan set submitted for this application. The proposed building conforms to the maximum average height of 71' and to the maximum absolute height of 82.5'. These calculations do not include the proposed tower on the north side of the building. The peak of this tower extends to approximately 140', however no habitable space is located above 82.5 feet. The tower is considered a landmark/architectural feature and as such the strict application of standard building height limits do not apply. In accordance with amendments made to the Lionshead Master Plan in 2004, the PEC has the ability to approve this type of feature provided the . overall proposal furthers the goals of the Master Plan. Ritz Carlton Club 2 Vail Resorts/West Day Lot It should be noted that the absolute height of the main roof ridge adjacent to the proposed tower is approximately 91-96.5 feet (depending upon where along the ridge the height is calculated) as measured to finished grade. All enclosed habitable space in this portion of the building is below the maximum height of 82.5 feet. The portion of roof that exceeds 82:5 feet is proposed to screen mechanical equipment (cooling tower; make-up air), that will be located on the roof of the building. ' Two materials are proposed for the roof - a glazed mosaic concrete the will be used on all portions of the roof that are below 82.5 feet, the portion of roof above 82.5 feet will include some limited use of the mosaic tiles but will primarily be made up of open lattice work. Open lattice will allow air to circulate within this mechanical area while at the same time screen the mechanical equipment. While the building will read as though it has a pitched roof, the portion of roof above 82.5 feet serves as mechanical screening. In the past the town has approved rooftop mechanical screening devices that exceed allowable building heights. A similar request is made with this application. Density As established by the West Day Lot plat (approved this past year), Lots 1, 2 and 3 are to be treated as one lot for zoning purposes. The total lot area of 6.82 acres would permit up to 238 dwelling units (35 units per acre). The Marriott currently includes 35 dwelling units (accommodation units do not count towards density) and Gore Creek Place includes 16 units. With the 106 units proposed for the RCR the West Day Lot will have a total of 157 dwelling units. GRFA As established by the West Day Lot plat (approved this past year), Lots 1, 2 and 3 are to be treated as one lot for zoning purposes. The total lot area of 297,165 square feet permits up to 742,912-square feet of GRFA.. The Marriott.currently includes 149,669 square feet of GRFA and Gore Creek Place includes 63,570 square feet. 210,549 square feet of GRFA is proposed for the RCR, resulting in total GRFA on the West Day Lot of 423,818 square feet. :~ ~:~. ,. Site Coverage As established by the West Day Lot plat (approved this past year), Lots 1, 2 and 3 are to be treated as one lot for zoning purposes. The total lot area of 297,165 square feet would permit up to 208,015 square feet of site coverage. Proposed site coverage for RCR is 77,760. The existing site coverage for the Marriott is 64,872 and Gore Creek Place is 60,602 square feet for a total of 203,234 square feet of site coverage. Parkin The parking demand for 106 dwelling units is 149 spaces (1.4 spaces per dwelling unit). All parking is provided in a below grade parking structure. The development of RCR . will necessitate the removal of an exiting parking structure that services the Marriott Ritz Carlton Club Vail Resorts/West Day Lot Hotel. In order to replace the Marriott parking an additional 237 spaces will be provided within the RCR parking structure. Employee. Housing Based on the Town standards of .4 employees per multi-family dwelling unit, the RCR. would generate 42 employees. Assuming a multiplier of 15% this would result in an employee.housing requirement of 6.36 employees. This requirement will be factored into the employee housing planned for the North Day Lot. Conditional Use Permit Below is an analysis of the Town's conditional use permit review criteria required for the proposed dwelling units on the first floor of a building and proposed recreation facilities on the second floor of a building. . 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. Analysis: A development objective of the. Town is to have retail/restaurant uses on the ground floor of buildings within the core areas of town. The West Day Lot is outside of the core area ofLionshead and as such residential development on the. ` ground floor of the RCC would not be inconsistent with this objective. It should be noted that a similar conditional use permit has.already been granted for the Gore Creek Place. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportatiori facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Analysis: ~~ Residential uses on ground floor will have no effect on the aboye~criteria. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and ~~ pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Analysis: Residential uses on ground floor will have no effect on the above criteria. Ritz Carlton Club 4 Vail Resorts/West Day Lot 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Analysis: Residential uses on ground floor will have no effect on the above criteria. ~~~.. <, Ritz Carlton Club S Vail Resorts/West Day Lot s p1 c~ C7 'c+vlea Team: ' Index PCDnwinge CSmI: Ualm Aldlvn Ld~na ArcMla 9aW CmnJmm Amultlo CemuAn: Cmo GmWlw: Peo6 Se.k~a LuNnOadmb pemlv4 PaWlmvns HrLwmlo~c VAIL RG900.T5 u~b ARCHEIRCNRE SR GROUP KOFLNIPIN COxLN2TW0 ~~~u~ 1°~ DF.VELOP.NFNT COMPANY SOMGS, F>SD ~ PICG NLM1YxNRK DEIGN eMaNVdm tp IRY AND PEIFA90N JP.HN WATHR CON511I.TAMS IN110HSVUA Sdv ]00 Ill (]urtFSVm F1:GINEFAS ROI?fRN5FT9 aA550G J Smd ROelye Rod, Suhe nO MSOW"^9uw 61513 G S S Ge51tYdL' 6a pva P.O.Om 959 M~Pamal An. ¢m 055 W1dmYI1P•a ~ y~y 09bado 6165] 12mm. Cdo:1o 50215 ]lane, ColoMUlOtlR Bofi:yxp Vm9m:M191 11164 Wea AWad~Pubrry SWOSoah Qu6oo Sven, OJif ' 91W0 G Yd C bM 101t9 B ldb A Sd 00 D001 P10E% an v nm a 9 V , v 1 . m 19rbn 910.416aMi Pb9e Mll21.0M ISJ bpvAmv4 Roxl P6avc ]0)192110 Phum: 80102 0 0 96 Spiv NS ^vvul. Sdv lM Ae9a CabMoB1629 Fm Ml192J111 Pn 6O20514N LLL.vmd, Cda.dv Ml16 P6am: 01.6469111 PT9en MS.Sn.l6b Phox ]0911008 AaeBAUKI00) Pn 9N.4)60099 Pn 305JPdN6 Pxvw 990.0525)5 ( ven BobenF Cmvec O:b OUm PEem JUJ.9M.I2ll Fps b11.NQ910 Pic 1N.5iJ.1Nl fu ]O1S21'0600 Pb°°°591.1211Af6 ~vmJpPVVmo Cu^vRJ jdt^ Fu 910.051158 :ag<d8 Fv: M1.969.O1q Cmd.T.Ja BmA Gavac SV.. RunJ'v1E Cmvn San GMiv P¢MJ.461.906 C'man Jr6 Hum Gmn. R0 KonNeb Cu:ua Nm P.®. 0002 BUIDMO M $Ux1MRT Sift DN[IOP4ntDC ' A. .. S s / Valid T~omanWnfomdmc Woo Pawn Pnd:lmimv Sm J n tl -0 i 2 Alx SNME~WruC ZvINEV I R ~i o .v wn : G w A4oeRwntC®Rnp Auo Px nm: Txe nnz.GRUON cLDVeR S6Pn11woe, INC PInK1ANn ,uPD2R U2cw wwc Hnv.lrs a2uliY ~ lec RAl/aRAlM AS10OA'I85, we BAlP56 60C S20 Pv~cmp LFRCH SDW] DDI 5 ~ P]STING [ONDmoxs , , RnsDeNCPS llb N.m. bTd Smn CONSULTAN15~wG 0520Higliv.l6. U:d A~9 ASSOCNTFJ,wG 6619 Wunmd Bl.d solo SOD IWOLim1 Aa9 CONSULTAMS wC. ~yR~uEm„•y~xy 9590 RedheR A~envSSUhc LSD 3U Mdv5my Opl BuBdLt Rtlge loop PdxuL ivdemfa4n 1000mn Sm Nwem PMnt ISM IbA5va55dv IW taJelv4 COlmdv0123 S.nu AeA CA 92195 Swv G2 d d aL COOT COO) ScNDUM OPAawO A DPNw.OE PWI 5[NEwRt lIIa11Y PIAx , S v l py~~.y~6pp Sdv 500 UHeMxm O~, 0Yh6®71H6 VJI, Cdondo 51651 PA.W~, CobdeRl6YI Sm Od~,Flade )021 Phne105. 95N Plar 9ro.41626N Pb:r 910.901111 Nemroq Tau 11012 Pbx9L11A9.6162 P6ar 09AIbA1N ANN Galmb [I6Y3 Fu: M].621015 PM1vve. b1Xd6211 Pa: b5.648.990 Fn 91 0.116 6 6 1 6 P.c 910.92EJ]90 Your 11]16615% fnu¢p'~Cakm.v Pn 190.98111N P¢919.416JOM Pbmc 910.926.]515 Fu:4D1196.m)1 C:maa BlO Wdpn Cm.... j^luPa ('manlmoitnR.Nmet Fu:fi]a6R0016 f<x9m1ex61..R Cmem AVdvxWmd4 Pn 9M909516 cwanlAatWw.l Eavc tSwaaw e .andlCap[: cman ,lm lnPRc u-lao lINOSOb-E FVx VIcWry Mnp ArcM2ecture: ~ Ao96 M99 LDxER G9AOE BOOR PVH UPPER LEVEL GRADE FLWR P TON RITZ Al O GR N LEVF tt00 _---_ PI003Fa00RR ~~ ~ o AI I A102 P~ COND l2VEL BOOR PUH AIOJ AIG 2MRD IFVft ttOOR PW9 Rlx l[VEL ELWR FLIx ' rk I C S nlae nnm nooN Pur u,4p~y. ~'~,_,, ,.~U i W V i/ 1 one nc cNr uxrr asc Iw d MDF 6aP ma ROOF vIAN wrtaPDUrzD ma.D M xa x ~ / ~ A291 tvAlroxs oNmA il c oSERAE ~ a ~ ~ R ~;, O iEVnMNs Ex~DEnttErAlaxS ~ A L A21• ENWIGED ELNAMxS ENVRGEO CLEVAtgNS ~ .. .ruv .urv: - A215 A216 AtIONS ExLMGE- ELEWMk+S _ - - - COLORADO VAIL ~; SmLDiNC SE~„ox^~5 f 1 .- , Submittal to the Town of Vail Submitted by: . VAn. RESORTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- 0 ?~p6 a EF V ~ s ~1N~.yy7 U ,sC Fy E~T~' L~ rn VAlI. RE50R73 DEVPJAPMFNF ~vm~mla46Do 4240 ~~m.6~~ ~19a°` 10YPW1 INDEX G001 ~k ~„'~ . ~~~.-`r"1~` Gross Residential Floor Area DESCRIPTION TOTALS Bzsemenl Basement Level tsl Larel 2M lavtl Jrd Lasd 3rd Ldl 41h Luel 4N Ldl Slh Level SN Loll 6lh leeal UNIT COUNTS Reddence COUntlPerwnle • 104 2 BeAoom Condo 60 ]B.S% 7 ] 6 B B T 3 Bedmom CoMo 11 ]9.! % 1 B B 8 6 B d Badman CaMO 23 21.3 % 1 2 6 6 7 S Bedroom Cdrdo 7 7.0 % 1 ToW lhb Pr Level N/ 0 0 B 16 16 22 20 17 1 Perkin Counl ~ Zm R 'mm4 bCondm 744.2 et l.4 spac es ruNt k4moR Ydkl 311 Told 3 area R bed ]81 Tobl Perkin 9 awe Provided ]88 l58 1 59 PROGRAM AREA SUMMARIES ' Conde. Greu ReeldeNlsl Ploor Mae 31!,1]4 13,870 29,876 30,585 42,759 2,212 30,630 1,750 31,685 B,BIS 16,789 Building Area Calculations DESCRIPTION 707013 Lower Beeman! r Basement Le1d 1a1 Level 3itl Level ]rd Laval Lea Ih LevN 1 LoR Slh Level LoR 61h Level i i ; UNIT COUNTS i ........... a._...... . i u....__.._" r'"".. _._. i.._.. ..... .... .... p... .. r ..._ ... ~ .. __ __.... j _......_ _.'_. _._.__ Reddenw COUnUPrwnta • 104 28ad'oom Carlo !0 78.5% 7 7 6 8 8 2 2 J Bedroom CaNo 41 79.4% 1 8 B 8 6 8 2 d Badman Condo 33 31.I•/. 1 2 8 6 7 5 Bedroan Cando 1 1.0 % 1 Talal lkiiN Pr Level W 0 0 16 16 22 17 Perking Count ~ Za+bp R 'moots for Cadoe 141.2 a11.4 s inB ManbR rdal k4 3]7 ToW 5 aces Repuirad JB7 Telel Perkin 3 scu Provided JBB 159 170 SB PROGRAM ARFASUMMARIES I .... _. .. .._...._ _ ........ ..: ~ .. ... ~ ~ ... ;.. _..... . ,.. ... .. i I . .. ~... _, ... ... ._4 .... ... _. .~ . .. _.. ._.._.. ... Condos Sellebb Me3ublolel Grau 228,778 11,696 77,66fi J2,d21 /4,554 2.458 40,526 2.000 79.117 8,675 15.Jfi4 OlrculelionlSUpporl• Piblk3 33,873 0 0 12.570 7.691 2,714 0 0 0 0 0 0 Caridore, Vedkd CFCWa6m 82495 Z.4d 2.440 B,T3B B.dO1 11,802 8,747 0 8,741 800 5,8]8 0 B.B64 BackM Naas kcl Mach 4],897 8,851 10,051 8,6/6 2.681 J,B]5 2;174 0 2A73 0 2.718 0 1.1 A7nrJ 5 1,817 0 1,81] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ` Tole! ClrculetloN3u erl 1]1,184 12.291 12,4& J1,241 iB,T7fi 18,611 8.710 0 9,214 800 8,598 0 10,71 t Prkin9 hoe ]81,339 62.K1 B1,BSB 26,828 0 0 0 0 0 ~ r GROSS BUILDING AREA S991J1 74 TJ2 7445] 727 SO.dtt 50.852 SJ ]]d 459 49,740 2.BW 41816 9675 25,4 u~ ~o ~~c ;rv~ ~~ cP`~ z O~ ~~~ OA W j[[[~TT~jjj7 9 VAST. RPSORTS DEVELOPMBNT ~avOt~ w 4240 `~ a ~.I ~3BaJ[R QYMB BINDING AREA SUMMARY G002 LLG£ND A •a•. a ~ -i6u- -- ~ _ _ _- -_ czuixxuw> _ - - - ~- =~ t /^ ~t ~ (cREAlEO ev lHis Pur) . AnRS~~ /~~A / ~ / t / 1 Accxss wnr ~ ~+ T / % ~ / ~ 11 (SHADED MEA) / rr ~ l^ ~~~ /i \ ~ 11\ -~ ST LIONSHEAD C!RCLE (50' R.O.W.) r, `` __--tl pEARTER ti ` ~/ / ~ wtft T: ACn ` \ / ~ /'AwAtER ARD SEw ^ (B i'~1~ \\\ > ~i / / ~~ U ~\\ \ ` ~ i'/ ~ \ J ~y _~ ~\ ~\ / ~~ ~ / ~ 1 1 ~ ~ i~ f ~ ' / // \ \ . T 1 i 111 O ~ 1 1~ ~ y , \ ' ~'~, M w,. °°~ a M., ~ ... a .a,,. ~":~ \ ( A~. _ \ Y ~ \ \ .m ~.... o .. 1\ ~A r th ~i F` i rp t d~ ~'h / tt ° \ ~ 1 1111 ~ COHSIRUClIOH ~~~ ~~.• s3 / /. N Fq, / 2 / a~.e" / "; ° N) ~ '~ 1 11 LOT 2 \ ~ ,. 4- ~~.. ~-.'' ~ - pp / d~ / t 1 4.1 \ w6sr onr sueoiavan i ~ ].]99 ES ,~ ` / ' ~ / 1 i' t 11 i-~1 ~~ \ r ~ \ 0)28 t-. C.~ / ' ti' ~ ~4 i hj) ~ ' / ~.~ 1 ~ i~ / / / ~~~-~~`` ~N \ _~~ -tj_________ _ ~ R 6HARE0 iDRMNADE EASEDEH~ Z __J \ (CREArFD Br Mi5 PEAt) ' ' / \ ~ / ~ ~ / \ ~ / `~ ~ ~ \ awsHEO naa+ GARAGE 1c.EE ~ - eltz y, ' nHisHEO rtDOR GARAGE EEKL z - ettfe• x ~ oti ;,^ ~~' N, SEME ,,1 1 [A yIyI ' ~ I i~150 E ~6y,10 04\ ~~~ \ am / ~ wt ' , o~ `` l E ~\ ~ \\ ~- S.® yew.' ~~ •` ~ . LOT 3 wcsi onr weoiNSioH . 0• s z . z„~ t N1A11 ~ E~ / , ~ ee~10~~~ J 1B1 zs, ACRE6 ( rnv. ~ i ' ~ / ' ' y0 ~ H No-51~1y1)1 N1C11 ~'E _ lN1 5 (R[LEPPGX Ewwo H RE m CM Es z y u 1 05' Ra it m Ef6 ~ Sh ~n i C , DR `\ 4 J ~ \ Eo r ~. ~~ n.o n 1,._-., ) r c4~ ~`~ V ~ ~` \ ~•~ 16. ~ . °~ ~ / 11.y9' ~ \ \ G \~ \ ~ ~~ \\ \ ~ `~ 1 A~ ~E` ~~`d`."r ~I / if S ~..~~.~.R ~o ~~Q~`4~ ~~ O~ 4 a o~ Fz~ VAIL RFSOR7S DEVELOPAffNi L~MPcPp pY 4240 .w.rc~wwFnwn nnvwa~q~.moc~l+Tµ r~grn rwiaui a~ _/~^~'\ Y,-.~ unEeeE.mm w m... ,. ~...~7 ~ GRApPHfC~ SC'ALE ~ wee ~~ f mfr rm ~wao•v u amm sww urd~ "' ~T ~e Venw ~1 _ w~ivn uuvun p NONUN£NT L£C£NO a~ ~• ..e•um ~^ o ..,~ "~ mw4 ARV. ev Hk ~ ~q A•oe .ea ... m ,niw nd x e.w v a.~.~..~o. w, rwo,. O°0 ' ' T T o'~ r~o4; z o~ a ~z~ ~A~ x~ F VAH. RHSOA7S DEVELOPMHNT COMPANY DECEMBER 21, 10AM EXISTING SITE DECEMBER 21, 2PM PROPOSED SITE 4240 ~~~ ~a~~ I' °I r~ `I, --~ r rz-~` } ~~; r ~ ~""`~ SUN SHADH ANALYSES DHC 31 SD 1.02 DECEMBER 21, 2PM - EXISTING SITE DECEMBER 21, LOAM PROPOSED SITE SEPTEMBER 21, 2PM F.xiRTING SITE SEPTEMBER 21, 2PM PROPOSED SITE ~t~j, f l 4 ~t'+f ^ to `ate ~1 ~ l L ~.n 1~ 'S' A I t ~„`4 ~ t of y: p. _Y} ' r~ ~ r:; E\ rrk Y, ~ ~ `1.. r ~F` ' ..a 1 _ ~~„ r , r- i4 'mot ~ •~ ~•~~'>~ ~ _: ~~ ~ ~t~'~ ! Y ~ 1~y ~ ~,ln- _y. ~~~~~ a. a SEPTEMBER 21, 10AM EXISTING SITE SEPTEMBER 21, 10AM PROPOSED SITE ~, o~.~~~~`o? ?~o Ju ~~ ~g 40 a o~ ~d~ ~W~ xA H~ VA6 A850ATS DEVFLOPMFN7 CODIPANY evw,cauuw 4240 r,o,evwa,e v.. . ,~ ,~ ~ ~•~_ ~ ~xI~~ ~ ~. ® POL[ttt QfPU.N SUN Sl1ADH ANALYSIS SEPT 21 SD 1.03 ~/ // `\ ! r~ ~ e ~l it I-.' '_~,,' i .~ .. .. _P..M[ eu rnlnc ~ / iY"r/. ! + r. "a «n.~ Y '•~ y ~ tl / i~ ' r e r / ~ i ,; r .,„'4;"#r"n r ~ - --- - __ - - __ °}, _ _ _ - ~" a . rrry'u9b'"~' ~ N,.a. _' ~ _ ~~,r~n +~ -~ c '~/ !. - .oe- '°~~ cr ~Kn. _ _ __ r'... .......~,.'-•-.~.'-_•'- .. t'k5 ~E~~ '~~i° ....,e... •i5 '~ ~`\~`, ~'•EY-- Lf ~ I r ~' F~ !" -_ __ .~~.p .. xrt:Si ~aN~Er,D CIRCLE - ir` ~.'~`' - ~~`\'' rq~ r rf • ~~ r , d lPr7/ .'.m ~ t _ ~~?~-}--"=may _ ~rt-1- •':~ } °p 4 / ~r ~ ~ 'I~ q /,. ~$,~A... rr r / r~ / I ~ . ' r /'/fr /~ / / `i+i t\ t ara ~~ ~ r~ I V,V,,~~tg . `,~ /r::! ti, r i, 1 . it ~ ~//i \ 1 'V e,~.. .`ta'i ~ ... :r f r.ri i 1 ~/ rr 1 : l/ / 9.1- ir`~; ~~ VA ~ .l 4r r; Ir yr- /r~r #S'I/~liAir _ \ ~V\ .~ ~\p ~~- .' r~l~ ~,i r'?K, it rr rv~. w~' A.'.' i % )/ l J W r, ±\ f, , i `' EASTNC CONWtEtE 1\`,`; ~'' i . f(, ' I P/JiKINC S1PUCiUPE 11 F Y . i r r . , ' ~ .r F . ,. , ~ ~ / . ~ ,~- ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ _ xeo xm .... J ~ ' 9+ ' >~ / !v ~ it J , .ct'e r 'eQ. ~ ~ :{____________! xno nau ....a uw.-.,u. ~ \\ - _ =; -'iGxir'_- ~~ a'~ +:r's~ -~ / /Ci ! ' ~ r~ i ~~ /r ~' i ,.• ~.. LOT Z ,-.+„~''.:, , ~" K t . v' ; '/~ fir; ;/rj , 'f :. * _ , \ ~ \ ~ - ~ __ ~ ~ ~r•° ,i ~' ~: ~ i ~~ t ..' / . ~ r. ' ~; , ,,..'"'. I i\ '~4 41 III .x. ' /' ~ ~\ ~~+ ~~ a e,~~ i' +~ .Ff', i+ e ' ya\\ 1\1 III '~' -r ~ i .F. .. m. / \/ \ / ~ I ._ ~ t M _} §fj i ~ , /' I ~ :!` ~ _. ~ ~ .: ~ ~~ ~ l ~ ~ SLOT t y ~`\ ~ ~ 1 '-€•v .rte u' i - ^'I ` ~:~ S,t; ~, .. icy. ... -'+"„ ~ _ V - ,. + ~`'~` t ~ ~ ,~, ' \~\ •A'4. `a`l\ 1\ '. \ ` ~ ~ ~ i'~C~i ~~~il ' __ ~ ~ Hit. - 'J '~ , i __ b ~'r . _ ' - - -- ____ s'- ro apl-a.s .. ~ , V , ' ~ _ c .. -- _ _ ~_ .... O~.m ?SOP za O F ~z ~ ,~ W r7'i A F VAIL RESORTS OL•VFIOPMF.NT C,OMPv~ ' os>et..~xx... 4240 w.w.onKa.r,.el.r~ EXISTING ~_s ~ - ~ ' ~ r a.a„,..® _--__~'..~w..',~~„-',-'" ~~ ~~'-" '- _. ~~ .. -- ~_~'...-_ cRAPxIC scm.e CONDITII `~'~.`, Z-'~e~`t\~ .l..;r:l8i~ _~%~~'-~w,I,°'°'~~,c'=' ~ - -~/- ~/~.v'~.-:i-_~ rv 0001 /; C J l l / 1,,/f~'r../ // .,.~...'~, ~, I I ! ~i 'f I~ ~ i ~( ,~'~ s /~ / % ~ %rg'~ ~t '~ ~ ~ ~` / l l;-~~ ~j///~y~ ~f~~I ~?_~~~ !I i `'ill // ,//~ ~ s ®I ' s- `~ y-~oQ- >/ ~ ~ ' r /~ \ ... - ~ `, r / /: , w / / ir/ r r '~° - a \\~,." __. __ - a~..u?auR .~\ _ ~.... ~• _ - _ l ~ ~~- `'""~.t a. \ \` ~~ / ~J i I / a ~ // ~,~i~~~.~•4 c X e r ~~i- - ~ ^~`" '~ s -~".v{ ~ .w. ~-b~i~ z%'l ~~~>~~ ~~~~ \, \'\ / , r / \. /~. ,, ~ r ,.1 I ~ ~~ , } _, ~ 'Y^~ ~~ A i~ t rrl~t'7"°~' s- +7 ~ I~ 'J \\ /~I \\ ~\ /// i' (Y- ~ ____ ~'~ ~,;ri~~~~r~ //r.~ ," rr....y~ _ ~ ~', ..a~,F a~.-`- "`d" '~ r¢~ _ t~ '' ~ y eyi \~.... ~~~// \\ \( ~' 1./`..^ .'~".~ ~ ^r.."~','•~j ~/!/~ %"1. T °~+a` '^s ~.~ r~ =,' .i~~ CCC~~J U B / / _ T' " \ / / ~ / \,- ~\\ i r 1:T 1 f% 1 ~/ irk / l r / x '~ \ --- ~ !. ' ~,z ~ <(~ .~I f;~' ~ ~-' / lye / r~/r{% `fit` !j/r// ,2 r ~J l i 1 ~! r ~/~ ~ ~.~ ..1'~ ~~.-`v ~~~~1 ~ \ `• •-~- ~ P4 1 `~ " .-- t I f~ ` ~ f VAII. RESORTS •' / ' l ~~~: .:~ iii/i/~ l l ~ ,~ ~~, .., ~~~,~ / t jr/ ~~ `t DHVPLOP.~NI ~/i y / j ' 1 ~ 1./, ~k'-'t tir ~ .~`,I ~~pt COMPANY / // "' // 'rr~f` try, ~ `//~ / r \~ / + ii/~ ~ ~('„497R ~ - g- }4~~~..:. '.~ / / ~ ~ , / ; ~%F > ,g ~,., ,c _ ~ ~!' x{41- ~ ~~ , 4~0 \~ / ~ / / ~/ / J r r \. ^^^~ y e........ a_ ~. ~ `~//\ n ~rfr~~` ~/ 1 ~~/ i' '~ /i .1 \` ~ ,yrl'G i.a . F. 1.~ _--' J ~-- .~.~mec \~' `,V ~~:~~.'a~ .:~ 'f/ (`':/~//. i !./'i ~~i/ .' iS% i / ` 11 ~ ~$~~~~• n ; " c..+nxir ~~ -L~~- wnoev® ( ~• ' ~~ ~;~ ~ / /G v / j /;r ~; i /, . ' r t ate,:.,>I x _ ,,,~~a f~ U ~\ \"yy`'_-s; l~ ~/~/;'.' ¢~/ / f' ~' / tf. ~?t , ~r .' ~E?i ,',s' Q M +~ ~,,,w.ri' / r I ~/ w..~..~ a l / rp. / / / p~ ~ ! ~/~ y . \..,~.._ _~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~-~ j xN p p~~ ~ .s 7~ p•.~1 ~t~w~-'`q ; 7":-,:}''"~ ~ou,~w,m., /A X10 / f, 1 i / //i// /~ .. '.11 ~ A p.+~ k~ I `J ,. \\ ;.~° -\ 1 ~, ~.~ \~~~ ,,ra ~'/// /. r ~ .. ~ ~~ ~ d x~ d.y~ ~ \ ~ s ~,'' ~ 'w.1 X b,f~tf t ~1~ .W'. J ,~ -~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' tt . r ~ >h t~' ..S'~~' 1 s~ ¢~ ~ \'ry`~ - '' `\` ail t ., /.~ ~ X11.' ,~'' I 1 -.~t~ U p. ~ to ` h ;~.~ ~~\ "~n^ \ ~ _._ ~~ X N Y - ~V' ~/ \ ` Ly .yam s i /~T ~\. "" y~ ~.T ~* !~ `~ ~ ~~- ~ ~-I'f~/ ~ ' s~-/_ ---' // iif ~, `\ ' ' ~'f t `."reJb ` man '-~ ~b I lei ~ ~.~" / NvN C \'J,`\` `\ Q• `i•~`; \ _ =_'AAe~-='-='-- -----"" y~~~ ~ ^,~ ~~ ~ % .ate r.m \ r. ,,_ ~\T i'/ / ", -' ~~ - ~ o ~ ~\ _ / -._~-_ " SCHEMATIC Si -' ~~ i ~`~~ .. ~ ~\1 y ~ ee ~ m ~, _-'~% _-T_- ~`"-;-_':..""s%'~. ~~.i ~y~\lT~~ ~ALpCIM GRADING 8 )I \\ `\ \ o _ ~ ~p ` ~ „i ~9s" r'~~~/i ' ~ '~ „~u.~,~+ %._ ~./ -" ~- ,~~ 17i~~ DRAINAGE ji ~\ ! ~ -4.. ~ '~~ \.~ S~ - • ~Or ~/ i / / i /.". .- '_ -' ~!° ',' PLAN ( \1 `a ~ ~ ~ i / ~ / / ._ -- ~ ~/~' ~ ~ _-~~~ ENCINEERWC ING LEdB~ID ~ : ~ s; l /~"~" 5~+. ~ d "~~ !~ ~' 1 i ~•~.. / 'p.. ~ /Q~ ~... w...~.~....,. H. C ~ m~""° V \ ~ ~~~ ~ , i ~ t sr~ ~{,/~6+ J r '~~_ ~ „ i f, i i !~ ~:, ~'°? .~J ~` ~ ra/~f~~/" Qx( ~`Q~ e.,.a aaR ~,,. ~_ - _ - ;r <Y m 1. ~. /a r « .,i r/ r ~'/ - 'a~'°«~'c~""xn--':...........-- ~ .s- ~~~,~ z r~-y~ sr ~ r ~ ~F] 7 ,~~n-nom .w~ mnumwt en a . ~ __ ~.. -_ ~« ~!, 1 `` \\` / % ~ t ~ / wr an. t a un~wu' ~ - ~ t ~ p z` .~ • ^ yam. ~ a+t,~ ,~ \`~ ~ ~ 1 mm nn R[«.a _ e .u ru Ms rm u[ I a.«..m.,.« . ~ i % «... °~°...-°.. y°.-~...a,~ !-~; ~\ tel.. /, ~ !// ,: ~ -.~ ,,, ~~ ;~ ,^~ + ~.,,i ~: ~ w -m-•- -"~~ .a ;.., ~=••~.~~, ~ / /t~y~I~s-w,~ ~/t,/' ~t %~ ~x~~yc 'V I ~V\ ~' V 1. '!~^ t d / 1 ~~ ,i /„ -w ~ ~ ~~/xs// p, ~ i / ~ PROPOSED I \~ ~,.~„~ ~ x .~r~~1 ~y ! /~ l~/ i ~ / / ~~ BUILDING ~u 1l ~1 :` - ..~~ .>a_ m ,« ~/ t , / f t"y'~ ty ,/ r~ ~ ' :~ ~ v '. 1` i\ r- ~~ > ; ._J~ 440 ~ fyl v O m «r. / / .' ~ / ~ rrr ! F, ~ t ' f l ~a - 1~F F V i , ~; \ ?; q: \ ~ -_._--_. _ s..ew. ~\ ~~ ~:m+w"r,' / 7~ ~ // s ~, ~ ~ ~ ~~~a / ~/ %~ 1, I._. M i...sai o ~ ~ ~ 1~ _ t~' i~ . ~ ~hi~~ ~y.\ \\ ~ _ • - ( ,' ~ 5~~ ,j. '~ f ~: ~yf r ~ yr~ ~f . -~'`~ / ~a ~ _ R to ~~ ~ a, a •}"- 0 a r1 \~ ~ ~ -._`'lls"`~/` ~'"1 rt -, m..~,.«d. ~Qy`~~f~\`h. 1 /// J + ~~ ~L~i~( :ar+.'^c ri j ?t \ i <OL"' ... ~ {\~~/r w.t :-.,ef Lf1 T,.11' ~ `~. ':1 Sn'w2~i« 1~ augs ~ ~ ~~ ~\ a"aj (~ \~'>~ ' i~` i , r~/ ~/ ,A ~' a, .~ I~~ -ow s`~ ~ 9£~`~`d ~1 s ~i n'Hs ~ "'r~ \~ ~' •: \\ F;\\ ~y \V .3~ ,~ //(~ ; // /,~ '" ~~`~ # ~V a.«~~• •o ~•, x i /r s y.f ~~':r. ::l''... \. \ \ .ttrs <~,,.r /, c ~ ~,.sf'p'/ i~"_ / t . 1 ~ ! ,t y's ~ l fits ~~;;''` ~ a~~~ i~ ~ it `' ::. M ,. J xy \ •~:.r.. ;~ {Y` ,$.p .%:•Po~, ~ ~ R\ F / ~ ~ ! ~~r ~n G ~ i /~'-•.y / - } J .fir Y yt' 4~p, // ~ ~~ ~\ 'i~ ~ •. ~~' ~ ~ ` ^ ' • •\,a` i( i ~, ~~ *F` an ewa.a~ssa~, mu.wu ~ ~ _ iT y /~~V'.,, _ _ ~ ._ _ _ _ _ /~ \ ~.~~--,o--+.=-~'~ s ! `\\\ 6 ~, ry :.L' 'F ~~'"; e ~ ~,\. .~'. .f _ ,, ~••, ,,.!j ice' . U, x , t 9 1~~ ~~ \ \ C, \\ "~..afoi~aSa~.__„y~ -__ --- . 1..,_ i t. i ~ / ~' ~~ ~, o m a \ ~,, ~, 7P~~ _ _ _ e~ r.m _ ~'\ ~ xVC u `J„ 1\~A\~/ ~/~ /~- r ~` 1:~;,;,,•."~.i;~~. -~-~ '~=r°~~ 8CXEMATIC ~ 4 ~~ \' \~`\~•\• t~~ ~~ %~ ~: ~e ~ ' ~ _ . ~ ~ _' -;i'_`~_ .,~i' UTILITY `` x\ ~``\V ~\` - -- ~f ~ ~~~ _ ~..- :' i~~% '!~'~i~-'/J-~~i^'-~~__~'-~~ ~ ~ PLAN r .. \ \ ~\ _e. ~ bi ~i ,y-- i jai ' ~/ ~i ~ .sue i ~ /~ ENGNEERWG INC ~ __ ~p Jai ~ O m ow.F.ewrw.r '~~~ ~ ~ - ro nw Ifs r-- _ r ~~ ~ i I ~~~ ~ f ^` ~ , ' . •i ~ ~.,,.+~ a `` f /, lllr I i•, `'e,;;,_ ~~/ ~i ~ I ~ i ~ - ~ ,m~".~a .e„o ~~ - r~ iGy _ ~ as .. ng.y~~ t \`t Qei i ~i ~ ~. `, \` %, ~, /~ .~.-/~~ - ~ST LIONSHEAD CIR µ ~~>~~ ~.."` _ ~a ~W - .,~. a..,... s\````~i ai l _ Esc d ~«s T. s o3 s L.~ r J \ ~ `. . ~ °~~ ~ ~ _ YB ~ o.... .:r'~w.. \``\`t , ~ ~ f,• ,y " ~ ~ ~~,.~~~ { ~ L~ ~ { - t.. ~ I ~~v~~ae.we.F~.~ orrr°~.~i.x yo.+.rFa. = nr.~. ..,,wa...~ / r ~ t y-- s ~T s ~{ .= ~ 1 I ..:~ va..r. we°M`...... vAD.RCSOR75 ``t \`•(' / - ~' '~ 5 ! ~ ~ tc t~.~~~ ~.n DEVPlAPP~i'f t % t { - t N ~YJ ,~(y~yq/ ^' ~l' ty ~ IA tM1~..T~."AMf ~~ - `•m.mom ~~~W~~kj~\/\/G~ /A~ ti T ~ ,1 ~ mero~ k` .~~ / { ~ to~s',i f D\~y is ~ `• 1'36 °~ w~raa~muru+ ~ _ i i ' /~~~ ~ ~~~I`` U x +i~ miry s{{c,,~~t,,~~y Wn~ w C ~r•'i - 1 j w •o~ewp~ua. wrisr ~..s~. F~Pd.rl - nwa e ~ _~ /. ...~ .-• ~ 'NEP{!+~ G s. ° t ;~'~ - ~ ~ GG ~PSffis me...o.•,~. T : ~ -, R 4240 /p//y ~ Y '' iC ~' , "'7 ~ _ ~_ , t t _- _.T,°N+°^.•w _ aeT.w s.sw*m~ o..~,~ %/ ~ ~ w T..F....,F ~~w.; : - nc~..,~aF,.~~.e.'an°t ors /~~ p~ 1 r ,~ - ~ l i t ~ 1'Y I } i .w*.~..,w~'r' w~....n'"~ «D~a.ro°ae'r+"'0~e t~" .r t. ~ ~-~ -- i ~' ~ / ~ h __ l ~ ~Y~" y r ~t C \\~1 `~'~~ VL'~ ~u~F..rntl~.MS~ WV+OV - wmrF .ev.wauon i t \V l' i / , / ~ , , ~~O~C~~ , . _ ~-" -+ ~~ ~ 4 r.}2 y ~f !1 „_~',`"r~~ T~1 ,.~+ ~ t~ .a,...,a...~.Fr. ,,. - ~, .. ~. _ J O i s v, p ...5 ~~ ,' r _ r u S ~p ".,,1+ r-' ...~wr!~_ 1 - k u~ PA~N~ ~ - t ~ t t ~~x~ ~ ~ ti„ ..,~....~na.~, / ~_. I 1 FWG~riw~ tit i. .. ( ,.n,a.,~."° _ d ~ z = s ~ ~ ~~. _ f tt w , h~ ron s Fwr^ -~^ ' 1 t 't S-;~i ~~ ~.;. ttC 7t a j . 1 ~~ s , ~ y ~ / , ^f PXTB NOT ~ t ~~ ~ Y~~ Y f, ~ j ' tom.. ~ f~. ~ .. . F hM ~ G•^ uUV3 fir. • ter : - `~ . . " 1 . J ~ -o~ ~~ ~ 7 ~` J ,,ttom~ T ~ _ ~ ~ ~ / i } ~ . ... :ate ~~ 1 ~~ ~. ~~ wt s '~~s sL4":'~ oC ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,: ~t''.'' 3, X ~ ..~.' ~•;' " .,,ry~.~x, 'SY ~ t^ / ~ / z - ~ t - spry -~ ` t f 1 } LEGEND .. }j ' ~~.~ 'c•t t~ r1~~' Si"1~ ~ .~,s.~,ti L"'~i^~.. ~ Y.~: ~ -'~...,. Ewarwa co"rouw ~`p~~. ExaTwal~T~E /f ,~~ J~ _- tG ~~~.~ N .p Mt`f~kj~ '~ ~ ~ TO BE REMI~'ED V ~, I. ' t / ~'SY~ f t ~ 1 ~ PRO.OlE000MOV+s ~ y~ ...a.mrw• nm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ,,.. c~ ,~~ r i ~ >t F~~~ a+ wrrauama ~.K~9 °®Twt ~'~ t ~ ~ _ '. k ~ c r i ,5 1 - ~ n ~ Too or ereo ~ LANDSCAPE .. _ k , x ~ ~ ~ moweEO FEnE"uwa PLAN /1 ( I :~~~~-/. .`~ \ " _ ~i Wt0• IFDTMAOE . 41AOPOLW00.91 1 ~L' t~ i~ tI ~ tti, fti. TW• TOV OF WNl PROPDlEDBIRII~ s X+'a 'G ~~RF t - \ t i r t Y.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ar • a)RON Or W/il1 Q '~. ' fj !t~ :, ~' ~ l ,~ f ~ ~ 1. ~ -' ~ ~ PaooolED OECauaua Y M • "aN FOM t • f igEE! 't 'T" .. ~,( / ~ ~ i'~' V Y ~. \ / ~ o yr •v ~ / ~} ~ V F IAw MNF FgOfClFD E/ETIfl1FEN ^~ ... " y. y ... ~. '~?f 4` 9f~. -- F ~•~ Fj `Il. •~ ~ - TC i TOV OF LIl11! TPEE! i; # ~ .ra: ~. •~ > ~ 3tR~ G~;r~ _ ,.L ~"+~. 2`r ;. ~~~ \ \ ~,...f` ~~~ f .' ` ~ t ~' _ ~ iu~irre"~ uv.i,D u Fuan~a.~rto w FnowlEO uW+/ rDa w Wa@urra+ ,~ ,1.. 'ti"4 ~ ~, ~'~ ~ '~ t ~} f L /'Y - U~NpgOgalla allaAl`MH~M l41 Pa~ Pw/uA 1 ., _ s' T.~t _, c.:;r,--.- ~~~ j \ ~ r •~ ... ~ 1 ~. arroe.ur enuvlDrm•aawTnx. ~.. ,... _` I.A 100 o'~ P .1-~OQ O~ F ~ WC~ ZJ 3 ~A~ ~~ H vnu, arsoars oeveLOPMFVr comm~rir 4240 ~.~~ ~.~ ~m ~1LOWER LEVEL GARAGE FLOOR PLAN II ~oA~R.4O~, 1 ~ ~. ~'-o• ~.n... FLOOR PLAN \J A098 ~. ~~ t`~c J~~o ~~ o`' z H> ~g39 US Q {7a R~ VAII. AFSOR7S DEVFI.OPAffiNT COMPANY .vuwcaa.oo 4240 ~~~ ~;~ :~~ M ,~ o ~~~R ~~ nUPPER LEVEL GARAGE FLOOR PLAN OA1L`GC ~/~r.~'-a• .~a.w FLOOR PLAN A099 11 ~~ / \ ~. _ ~~?`~ ~ ~ !,~` / ~ a Qe° y~ / ~ a ~~ ~ _. _.. I ~ , / /r- - ----~ - _ _ --i i/ / I 00 O I I "~' I ~ / O ~ s~ I '~61C~ ~ //%/ 4s°~ ~~ ~ _ I i / ,~~ ~ w~~»G .a.~/ I I ~ / / LJ ~ I / I / ~ /_ r- n 1 /~ ~ I ~~pgRB~IN~ ~~q MARRIOTf ~ I / ~ ~ 59 ~PMK~x° SPACES ,rjl ~ I / / - ~O r~ wuP °N aria . ~~/~ o _.~ D o ~ ___. L J ~P I i I o u u 0 ~_-~ 99~I~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ DN L _.. J {l ~ { r---_..{~ Y - I I e is I I I - `--- I I gy r--_ I I 2BR 2BR ~BRm I I I I I 3BR D ~ -_ - J I ails 2BR I 4BR AB _ -- - - _..J I I _ ._.._ s.. LI- - - --- - -._ _._ _._._ _ _.._.._.._ _ _ _.._ _._ _.._ -._ _ _ _ - 1 GARDEN EVEL FL .~ LAN ~°~c G~~° ~° ~~ ~o z o~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ Fy VAIG APSORIS DFVEI.OPMENT c~omP~~m 4240 ~ Rv~+uaw wim -~r ~= { _ _.~ ~PPA1ttT C[YPWI DnRneN Elva. PLOOR PIAN A100 m c~ ~,~os z o~ ~~~ 9 ,~~. A W~ w VAII. A650A'IS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY .vor4can.oo 4240 ~.~ ~~, ~,~ ,~ ~~ nFIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~'~• / i/~r . ~'-o- .~.~w. FLOOR PLAN ~/ A101 o'~ ~,~on z oy c~ ~z$ ~A~ ~~ H~ VAIL RESORTS DEVFIUPMEN7 COMPANY nwACOinuw 4240 p~~ J ~~~ ~. ~a.~~ nSECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SECOND LEVEL ~/ia•. i•-o nas.. FLOOR PLAN A102 ~ ~o ~~o~,~~ ?g~ GO a H~ ~~ ~zs ~A~ ~~ VM. RPSOR'1S DRVH1APMfiM COMPANY 4240 .~.,,~ J ~~ I THIRD LEV'L F OOK PLA m°R A103 c'~ ~`o ~',~c ~~ ~~' ?g 40 z o~ c~ w? Fy z u W` ' ~. VAd AESOA'IS DEVHGOPMENT COMPANY 4240 J rerouv (1FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~~TH~ V~~' ~'-o• +~..+.. FI.OOA PLAN A104 m c'~ ,~~ t~" ~p J4 z oy ~~9~ US .~~. A VA1L ABSOA7S DSVH.OPMIN7 COMPANY 4240 ,~ I FIFTH L V L FL00 N I PL~ooaPi N ,~~.. ~ b .a... A105 o'~ P ~~ 6 Q F ~ gg ~v~i3 W U r~~A; F pk4 VAIL 86500.75 DEVFd.OPMENT COMPANY 4240 ~~ J ~,1SIXTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SttTM~`'~ i/~r. ~'b• .~.w FLOOR PLAN A106 t ti ze II ~'~ ` I ~ `~ -~ \ ` ~ ' ` ti PpWPOSEq W.'DMARK ii III \ ~~.. 6> ___ ` -__ _ v ~ \\ `O ~ ~ - / \t \ ~ \ ~ ~ - _---_ tl ~ `\ / J LOC~1iF~[OVIP CNl IN ` wI - ~ a 3 ~ L~ y~-- /. ~ry OPENR~01\E, Q DD ~. ~~.w~ _- a~~._-~ - B '- i _ \ ~--!_;~ \ \~ ~ ~ / \ I 1 I w ~ ND~! ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ _ ~ _ r NN ~ ~ _ i ~ ~- _ ~ \ -____ \. / i ~ t \Q I ~ _____ ~ _ ` _ ` \ j . - ~_ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ t -` ~ w ~ ~ . ~ - _t - _ ASSU~E~-P.(ilA1NtY- _ _ _ ,-` .- ~ ____~."__ RODE RIDGE LMCi '-_ ~ _ _- _ I n Y' _ - _ \, ~ __ ~'---~_ ' ' `' ~~~ O ~ _ __i_ \ \ \ \ ~// / 1 I F .~ t i ~ ` YUA- ~ _ - __--`_-_ _ - ONE %ISIINO PER MFICR QN~ilON4' ~ - = = _~ _i(i1NI5NE0 d INfFBPOlA1ED C1U0E5}=_- l __ - _~- -- :I~ _ _ ~' _____ ___-,~ 119- \ ~ \ I ~ I fi ~ el __ = - _ -_- - O 1 - \ \ _ - _ ' ~ \ ~ ~.1 ~ ... A O ~ ~_~~ B - ,I ~ ids-~~E'{ ~i - C ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~~ _ _ --- '-.----- -_--- / --- =~° -- - - ,_ ,v DD, FKjt6p F- _ JL ~ S sw i+ _ ~_ ~~ -1NW-- "gym - _ _ __ ~k \ \_ ~ ~ \ ___- \ .. I ~ m esa \ ~ ~_ e,' _ _® I ~'em_ t ~'r3a~_ " 11 ='51 -- ~ i _ _ _ L \ I - - - - - ~ -~ ' L .. -- - _ - -- --'------- _ ----~--- o~ P ?~pA z F~ ~z~ y W o A W~W ai VAIL 1tBSO1L7S DBVEI.OPMEN1' ewOra~caw~eoo 4240 ~ ~_ __-_ ` ~ ~ _____- _-___.____-- n amN ~ ~ ___._________ -_ my N~umru _- __..______ _.___-__ _ r._~~ ' -- _ ( \ m ~ -_______ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ti L_ _ \\ \~ \\ NCTH00 Of CAICUATtON: LCOENG: ~~~~~ 4 \~ \~ CIJ~NPL[~ dl ee°zx uwb m •w. tw[. ® xtarpAim aun _- Emaxr wvr e,LSe °"'°°° '°"`"'°'"'"°"°` ~1HEIGHT LIMIT BASE MAP & ROOF PLAN MnrreeoorrwN .,, > .,... ,«L~.L .~ ~..: ~ Nwa.,<° w.Pn ~E..9 A 107 ~~,r;-,--- - ~_ = ~-- - ___ ._ - - --._ - - - ~ - -. _ . -_._-----_--_-~--------_l ~ I -- ~ I I I I I I I I I ~~~. .o ~ ( i 1 I ~ I. 1 i nSOUTH ELEVATION ~~p ;G Pg~' Gp z o~ ~~ ~z9 ~Q~ ~~ VAIL RHSORTS DEVF.IAPM@df COhIPANY 4240 ~,~„,s ~m ~rewecr rtrn.x ~1WEST ELEVATION ,fir . i•-r n..,.. OVERALL BLDG. ELEVATIONS (POR REP. ONLY) A202 o'~ ~,~06 -a---- -- - - - ~ - - - - - - °;i ~ .~` a~~i~1-C _ _ __ _ ~~~ _ NORTH LEVATION -WEST WI G - . ~ ro n..,. .n ~T~ ~ ~0 C nNORT ELEVATIO - EAST WING' i/~' . i-o mv~w z o~ ~z~ ~A~ vnu.assoezs DflVEI.OPAffiJ'I C~OI~S~ 4240 ~w~~ ~~ ~~ ~m I' °I ~-~ P6016R RYRAN PN1.ARa® OVA f10N5 L]L I r o JG~oi ~~ tag GO k 4~1Q'a-..__.._._ ----- -- ---- e~,~~ 0t b`n5-r m~a~A '~.~'° ----- z o~ ~~~ Nz~ ~Q~ ~. ~' " F VAE, RE40RT5 DEVELOPM1ffi~]T COM1fPANY 4240 ~~~ .:~ a raoncr mrus ~1NORT ELEVATION - TOWER ,i.- . ~ -e .o,.... ENLAnam ELEVATIONS A212 o'~ ~~oA z H~ r 4240 ~~~ n~ro ~w~~ .u~~, ., '" :,~~ i-ti of ~ r'V`l~ • ~ ~5 ~- ,, ~1EAST ELEVATION ~ rnNCa °TM"" ~~a• . ~•-e e..... v+uxoP.n FYEYATTONS . A213 c° ~z9 ~W~ x~ H~ ---~bea~ VAILRFSDkIS DHVFLOPML+NT i _.`.... COMPANY .` - - ~r ~r:ar- - ~ - --- ~=r g--- - --- - - - - m ~.~' m m m m oti~t~=a-- - - L - o-~--- -- --._~_. _ - - ~k ..,.c. ,,.. - ---- - -- t ~1P.'drh^c•--- -...--- - --- -1~~4-~--1- Mn ~, `e,wm, 'lmw~ - , ed~--- -- - --- - --------- - - y~L ~{ - -- - ° :~ n~ :.~ nSOUTH ELEV TION -WEST WING ,~.~ . ~ _, ,e.... ..~ .~ ~`~c o~ ~~ ~~ ~o z o~ ~z~ ~~~ ~~ VAIL RRSORIS DOVFl.OPrffiJ7 COMPANIt 4240 ~. ~~ ..~~..~ ~~~ ~~ ~.~ Mo~R RmwRaeo ELEVATIONS A214 JVU~I~ri !;L ~VA~'LU1V - !;A'~1~ YY11Vl> 2 ~~.• . ~ -o .~... ~~c J~ ~~ ~~ ~o nSOUTA ELEVATION - COURTYARD ~~.- . ~ -a .o.... z o~ ~' ~ ~A~ ~~ VAII RPSOR75 DEVELOPMENT coMPANv 4240 ~~~ ~~ ,~ .~~, ~~R ~n~ ENLARO® ELEVATIONS A215 ~. e'~ ~`o t~~p ;G ~P ?~ O a z o~ ~z~ ~A~ ~~ VAfL RESORTS OBVEIAPMENT COMPANY 4240 ~~~ .:~~~,~ ~~ ~.~ r.~,~a ,, ~~-~. WEST ELEVATION ® rwrzn [tnun ENIAROED ELEVA770NS A216 1 EAST EL V T N- W ST W NG o'~ .c~° ?gyp ;4 ~~ t~$ ~, O ~ i ~\DTTTi TTATI~ CCI~TTIT ITT ~1BUILDING SECTIO za o~ ~~~ ~z~ ~ ~~~ ~~ I VM APSOA75 D6Vti.OPMENT COMPANY I 4240 ~ ; vNL~ ~~ pm4ciWVaYM ~ai4uarMm.1Q Mu~rlivu owrwmmroo I r ~'> f-""~ r d 1 MWFR [EYPLIM Vl BINDRIO SECF'IONS ' A301 I t ~'i PT rl :at ~~ of PI: 61r1'I u1L 4,inll:?A~IP - .~, c ,. , ~ 1 - ..rte, ,.~: ,.. K~.. _ , . w y ,. , .. ~.~. o ..~.,.,,~ ca w~.,,,,._ _ ~r.c' ~* u• r :: ~ .., a..., .~ .~... -.. ~.~ - .,,- _...,. `:: `; a . s E Y i rr, _ ~ _ n:q.,,r 4i fo i ... ~ tw.,... vim. ~ ~_ A d m rtS~D> ~ ry. . / ~ !1 Sr.. V:tt_Yrtsiy,enT- -~. J '~ rt,..` . _„ ~.~.~ .Iw~ ~~ .orarr''~:c. ...., ._ ~ ~ r. - cTE, , u„~n`'a WEST DAY .SUBDIVISION M y ,i KFS(/DD/PLSYDAI OF PfRCEL fi, LIUNS/IF.'AD PENTI/OUSE S,'.4ND LUIS A, D, n, .1ND -4 P.fXT OF C, AIURCUS SL%DDIVIS/UN, .SH'C%'IUNS .G A/1'D 7, TUWNSHIP ,5 SOLTH, RANCE 80 iTh'ST OF T/lL' 6i11 P. d/ TOWN UF' V_9IL, COUA'TY OI' EACLE, STA%B' OF C.'OI.OK,1D0 I ----~ ~~ I~ ----,t-__-- .. I ^_\. jar (= -_~----~.~ ~~---- ~ -~ ~' ( .. i ~r _ ,;. -;- _ I ~----~ ,r I T ,_~ .'J ~ ~\ 1 I~, ~ v~_ __ 4 _ ~.. + _, _ J _~ / `/ Y~"' ~ 7' f r Jy- f .~ ~. - -~- ~. ~~..~. -~ - 1- r - - r- - - - - __I :,I. } ~ ~'~ I ~ •r i" 1 _ r~ i A .~ { 1 T i i L_! _ _-- 1.1_~ lL - __.~Ll ~. -- f-' ' ~ -- _ ~~~ _~ } I i ~ SIIL LOCATIOF{ I ~ I I I I i 7'_E rth. In;C'Ar' LQ/d )h'U. ~4fggg~Ny}yy~,,CLo~•_~tc :ga~~n~,,•~c(~Jw:.r I. nc rt~~u u• Y C9rCaa~~FS~ pk~4~RSo MtFds~4y ~s*2r+saTle~ ~~o rut a ' ~gni Titt... fiuararlcc comW~ ._. 107 5• t?'orggfe_~l. W/---~~' Lo - --.. y/.g~/1 1'iA.~l~:l'lt AYO tl{NtU{IAFII'. AI ccrullssl:xi CFR iIFICX IE ' - mw .. .., umv.,rn..~ r.~w.r,. n ~~GA~fixi.Rnu.c~+> •.n ~~' - 77 ., v..ioxu,llu rY.E: ,pX ~~• i r ~ .: ! S~yt :fR-'F1Ca't ;r IA'rFi F+.I~ CLERk !J{ri atl~f)YCER'S C.FR161i:A IE n~s rwf w. iuur w~~ on l,r-_ ~XIR•.T. 'rG1!'S CEF TI', rCA iE , Iw ,e.nu, anlxr m ~ ~ I. wn'~ n+. taw r.`Y:F~ttYIK to:;`I..!furnR +ro n Is i I.u. in~lxa-,m~p:~WU. "wun -, u rm .wl...x[ [2vlc,rs » mmx H?i=_' o`;y ~ij:;~c, ' yam.'' ~Ji,°~ml tt E~r.,r= u ,: :, L~;IYoY'._,~~. ~,.~:rK:'.,,,,...=mot.,, , ~x .~'~.r .x~~~r , ~ r.. ~ lAl:f E111,1~Af'_y_ a n •: ry~ onv v DEtftl6F~...c. ~00~._ ..a.' .e • . .. 7too'1y~5 Roo9zol Me+wn R ~ xn..~, .E~ ~e.Caa_-a.>k~- Roo89o7 .. _ . __ 8009 ~ MSggy9 n+c Inwc .x ...v.:.w +o-.. ~ .r , y~ ~ Iwwl ~v11~w o w..vxt r, rr.ru p...~ :~r~.~~.~~, ~ ~}W~ n ~~ ~.. ..~. K a .w~ ~..,. w..a, ~ n .,..,...,..,,.b,..t .~.., ., o , .a.u.,..n.nu u,o,. , H4 t »~,„ ,. ~,.,, ,.....,,..wn,~ ... ~, II . tv . o,.,«., .,.,ia. a.MK r.: www:.al w."'s »:w~.iu`,-e.'i.,oc`i:.`,`Tr ~~i:~y'.a''`-`.`:;'.r~rscti"~i:::.~:... ur.m~, .. e„ ..e aCr F"s!:m .e..<c<Y.~w....mw xi,ru w.. n., ~•au ., aa...., :'"~','W,"(`.'II`Q: ~'" x..: r.>'. v.i ..ii u~ _,xrsr...m~, x:~~~ioc.~•.. ~... ~.. =m, ,... ,. ,.- _,..., x m.o.~ ~.w. m. Sfl6'ET I of"3 WEST DAY SUBDIVISION A RL'.tiUHDlf7SI0N OF PARCEL 3, f,I0N5'/rE'AD r'liN%'HOL/SL'S, A9'D Lnl.~' .1, /r, u, .4n!u A PAxT u~' C, J11URL"US S'L'DD/I'IS70N, 'Cl'IU;1'.ti 6 _fA'D %, TOIVNS'r/1P 5 S'OIIT//, X:1NGfs 80 16E5'T ON' THE' 6Ui P.Af. l'OfYN OF' L;1IL, CUDNT}" OF EAGI,C, S'T.4TF. OF G'OLOK4D0 III li`--___~_ ~~<IR'-'ru'. or 9`[Lr wuw, I I WT A 'I I II I I .nT lur.Dn~~,rr ,r . _1 ,I ~' I I i~_ ' . - - .-~ v.. ~ 4L'4~j i..iUf'f JFr E~AD I;rA .. ~ ~ ~ CI-L 150' ft.:J.44' , ' % I ~~ C6 C4 / j ~ L ' .y '.a ~: ~~ , J / A..AT3L sT r :'s' .=<+7 1 ~ try a!y i I 1 ~ GHrV'HIL'. SG1T8 - fay %?' I I , ( ,~ i / p ' Ina:yre e - ~ ~ - , • % 'I I 1 _ '0 ° "~b % ~r- wr- --~: I_i LOT 2 t ~N,.n., a ~ I' Y + el i ~ ,y ` . } cvTa'~c ,> (tn.,wc/ .m twc.. _m. v.n J . h ` ~ ' r~ = ~. ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ waP,w r n Lapp -t _ "_ - - - ~ I TM W ,.1 nr;w H. ,. x _ _ _ __. _ rna L _ ~ _ ..- _- ulI Yy i Il __. _.. _ .... ` a t i ~ / / - n nz SeS'<J'_5"N' - rY.e Se' (SAC) ~5~9'.N':/"A ~- 1.11:K>9'] (I:kIL f~7t HOTAi:fJr :wl/4'Ur:i I.~PU.1NY3p fenli:) ~1. -__- _ -. _ _. ..~ NOTPl2++ ~ .w'!0'r9- •ho.in5' ~.ldY'F:T 1./cSIJ%/.^.+A .3:1..%n„A`,i)' i v'.rrwrro ,s.~ rms r'c.J.~r Itx m. m ~«s n`J.m _~ ~~ - _ ona . n.r~ ~. ie. ' ______.__._. __~. ____..__.___ __.._. l~r r Lor 1 ] I rro)2, ' (:;X:JTFiJ tlr' T.Y.S' Y(JT/ LA j ~ ]° ! '~ {~lI ~ ~ ! w Ihasr + .~ I'1~ ~~.--~ '; 1 IY• ~ ~ Lr Naxn ,near o I{~ 1 ,!~ ~\ I 115 nr~n eznPi)' iD 1.. /LT L<!' !',Ii.+.^fA dJ TH/.~ f'LA { 1 fwnes ruvN .!y rp ~Ir I i m t~ r 1 ~~t.... , / , - ~H~. '- ~ _ .87 E _ - ~.~, . _ ,-,gin.- "- 1 ~ rr c.xJxnl . " I n - __. ~ ___ __ __ -- ~ I~ µ69'42'43~ .296-~j ~' \~ Irl r ~• '1 -. .. _ J . __ ...- -- /f. _I Iwo :i:~u~La~ / r,s/ I.~.ew ~wo rum) r ' r:`~ •' _ 1'. an riJ:+r'.:1~L ty. Unrr, r lyr;) J:.e. L¢u r !- / m ! U9, f / ~ h _ __ _~_ _ _ . _ . ~ : f / 1/ N tia ~~-~r r ~.~ ~ / N .. ^r ' .+'d ]l_Li~S C:(?I9DOh91id r.)hti ~! S~~ ~wJU. ..t. .rf , ro'rnH>uau~>.l~ 'r :'.I ~ luu. .."L ~ - - LOT 3 ur, o ~ ~ w /! i~ ..,r Lra..l ~s s.~ars/or, ', ~~ I •~,i~wt,..vy v,,ir N31'40'14'W - 1.44' sn•z9.1o'w _i~ ~ 89.72' _ _ _ __ 1~. . l' T.YI~ i~JT w - '' . ~ ~ o__- >n.m 1S.Mm HnnmNr ..~, Ynr~ .~°~~ + ~ .. A ri. rd..l .5..+c +o ,«, s nm.< ,an _ 1 r (M~6) 1 imwV ,em wl 9LwNLN ~1 ~ ~ nt, w/,rv i tl m0u Let GMic. ry~ii4l r[Fr v; ~ •~ Iw 1111 `+rH~V CJIUM1r I\ 4 \ - ~ _~ ~ . ~NI/Yn M, TP31HLHr / ~` _ IsLi utti 'V LS nC rn vn! b) 1 ` _ ~ - -n ~i,+e '/ ~ ~ ... - . - ._- ... _._ _._ _ ' 111 ' , _ - _1576'M'19"W m,135.64~ - ._'' . U - ~-_ __. _ .._ .__ _ ._ ~ '__ . r~~. ~ . Zg2.z9' _ - - -- ._J N31'40'14"W - 1.44' 577'29'10~W ~' 89.72' 11I . F u N. v.w a.< IK .'2.` _ ~ _ ._ ..w wi ~+.nn _' 06,5419 W, _ ~ _.- ;rM. awl. _ -..._ui!~ iud_r _ -r.~ --- . - __. __eu.... ~wr m.:m per- _ .:v.z. ._2,.6P'!°' -n '4'~'._.. - - -~ C1RK tfR[ J > +-+fsi;f _ ,~ ~3i, ~fy S 1'WV N.1: J n ..+ ~ i L _ c r•. - - t ...a a.r nrcu 9~ L g Sy W "J3 ~- ~ _1_3 it :l. ur L} A9D'._ .31.. S: G f[_.. Lrr J,fN._ ... 7- Tf _._ .a .r 1 M ._ TtY_ Lr> _ r _Z,0 iJV ~ ~ V3vf Y_.. - ~A_ ._!M2`~er-._~I aF TJ!'l ', rt <•... ar .r•_ s a - ~nax•,<-> n r^xs_._ ii•-- » w v - .n ro~r~rc . 1. •' -- 3 ~ .. _ F2~ __!11> .. nPr rnT._ .nesyT. . _. ._ _ .'n.Cr.. ".3117:'/ . lYi._ .4.!4' . _._tll~ . . ..ISy - .r_yZ... :..L3 Pti;: 1-tT~ .!W u'_ .. S.u'+re ri'_ _ nsy~/f ~q, AIONUAIE!YT LECEA'D rac?s~+,~... ' `rd~l ~°~~ ~' l:Jrwr a ]!4b far . ~ ~ !1? . ~VATf llNe =' r s w r u, ne:nr .9,w,o rPnel~N+.p.,,...yxv ,r Cfx'ra ~! s. N> ::». SXF.ET 2 of :1- . ~ .......,. ..... .,,na,,, neerH er: sF mx H..um FINAL PLAT WEST DAY SUBDIVISION d RF,SUDUIV/.5'/OA' 0%' /A/{CEL 3, LlONSHEAD PENT/LOUSES, AND /.0:/'S A, B, D, :LYD A P.dl{T 0l% C, MORCUS SIIBDIV"IS/ON, SECTIONS' G AA'D 7, %'OIfNSf!!P 5 5'OUTH, /{ANGE [10 WF.'ST OF THE 6lh P.Af. %'OWAI OF I!91L, CO(TNTY OF h,'AGLE', ST.9TE OF COLORADO.. SY;9GJ.` f~60 ... .-- _-. ~__. _. Ilea x ~ ~ > e,a ----- ----' - -' -- _~ _ ~,w ~ ~:~ L ~ --- -' .. -._-- .1_ .__ -- -__.._____ ~[w.,~a -- .. -~--,~--' n~o -- -:_ -_- - _: --_ ~.. _ -- v ~~~~, I,~.v.o ---... _---- ~ w. .. _._..-- 'iinw-. .. _ .~vo _ C ~ -a.r _- -- _. ... xo I ~ r 1 24 ". ltCP DRLINACF AETAL4..°A" ~_.._...._._...._._ yin __._.._._.-. _.__~ aw.cr• 1 r ~ 1 1 ~ .;"brl ' ~ 1 1 :~~ 1 ~ i LOT 1 ' ,~rd~~ 1 1 1 ~ . FdJ" % 1 1 I 1 L_ ~ I ;5,y , 1 1 1 [ ~. J r ~ ~ aT ~ ~a c i LOT 2 ; 1 , . . I ;~_ 1 • ~ 1 ` _ ' 7 1 :~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ _ ~ _._ 1 : 1 ~:F ---~ _. _ V . L. ____ ~ " t I ~~ ' I ~n _ .. _._-._~. _.. _ -_ 1 srr*~,`~~`" - - ~ \ Iwvrmn~ mc:>) - a LOT 3 r a ~ 1 ~ ;,~ I :a 1 1 11 'f i 1 'i 1 1 ~ 1_ _ - -" ~ ~ ' 1 t - k - ~ ,v. _-' ~~~,mnr w ~ _ . ~ ' - _ .-. - -"' UTJLtl'Y EASE:f/ENTS AND ~ ~ DIUfN.ICE EASE.1fENT5 dCYI r, ~aPfpJ, 't ~iss%9 SHEET 3 of 3 DIUNN bY: IP JOB No. IIAE .I ~ ~ ~ d'MERC£NCL' i'ERlCLd 7'L~ff.N:1/:OUND EASEdIF.:YT, ANL i'R UTlLfTJ" 6A5'E'MEh"I' JCffd'.NA7'!C 3~L _.Lt4'f_ LJRAIKACE OFTA/I~,:N'. ~. _.._ .. uii -_ - _. __.'~ ' bD 1 ~ 'x l1YGl I @_ti,:INLT~RI' SEgF` R DE7AL4.._.(•:' West Day Lot/Marrlott HoteUGore Creek Place Approved Development PIanlDevelopment Allocations 06-Decr04 ' WEST DAY LOT (OVERALLI tlwvwlnnmwnf S4wndwrdw Exlstinp/Aooroved but Unbullt as of 12/6104 Lot Areas . ft. ~ 10,000 s . ft. minimum 297,165 : ft. 6:87ac ' Gross Residential Floor Areas . ft. 2.5 GRFA Ratio, or 742,912 s . ft. 213,239 s . ft. Number of Dwellin Units Densi 35 D.U.'s/acre, or 238 d.u.'s 51 d.u 's lus 276 a.u.'s Setbacks ft. 10 feet ~ varies . Buildin Hei ht ft. 71 ft. av /82.5 ft. max varies Site Covera e s . ft. 70% max., or 208,015 s . ft. 148,076 s . ft. Landsca a Area s . ft. 20% min., or 59,433 s . ft. 139,713 s . ft. Parkin . as er code DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION BY PARCEL Future Total Development Pwre~i 1 = Mwrrtott Hotel - Exlstlna/Aooroved ~ ~ Develoomertt Allocation Potentlsl Lot Area a 85,900 s . ft. Gross Residential Floor Areas . ft. 149,669 s '. ft. ~ 97,673 s . ft. 247,342 s . ft. Number of Dwellin Units Densit 35 lus 276 a.u.'s .. 25 60 Setbacks ft. varies n/a n/a Buildin Hei ht ft. 70 ft. avers e, 80,5 ft. max. same same Site Covera e s . ft. 64,872 2,533 s . ft. 67,413 . ft. Landsca a Area s .ft. 17,175 s .ft. n/a n/a Parkin 314 s aces 297 re uired n/a n!a Parcel 2 • Balance of WDL 1 Lot Area 104,500 s . ft. Gross Residential Floor Areas . ft. 0 400,000 . ft 400,000 s . ft. Number of Dwellin Units Densit tbd 162. ~ 162 Setbacks ft: tbd n/a Buildin Hei ht ft. tbd same same Site Covera e s . ft. 22,602 s . ft. arkin structure 57,398 s . ft. 80,000 s . ft. Landsca a Area s .ft. tbd tbd tbd Parkin tbd tbd tbd ' Parcel 3 -Gore Creek Place Lot Area 106,765 s .ft. Gross Residential Floor Areas . ft. 63,570 s . ft. 3.2,000 s . ft. 95,570 . ft. Number of Dwellin Units Densit 16 ' 0 16. . Setbacks ft. varies n/a n/a Buildin Hei ht ft. r,Y', r~' 41' same same Site Covera e s . ft. :?~^s~ 60,602 s . ft. 0 60,602 s . ft. Landsca a Area s . ft. 75,857 s . ft. 0 75,857 s . ft. Parkin 50 0 n/a C1 3 c~ 7 r- m .;,, 10 foot setback shall apply at the perimeter property line, no setback shall be required along internal property lines. r .~ ConMbaHon Ragaat Sprathilroet .. -...-...a _ GENERAL FUND ContrlbaNom: ~ ~ _ ./. ~ Z006Io-Kind F1noi Kind Vdae Fhul ' ~ ~ ~°a~ 1A06Io-Kind Regaml IUnd Valae a Io-Kind Cash Io-Kind Valae Rod SINer ECONOMIC: 1 • Bravo! Colorado/New York Philharmonic 6.30% 95,000 100,000 100,000 1' Bravo! Colorado Note #1 1.00% 2(,375 IS Ford Park Permits 1,350 25,000 IS Ford Park Permits 1,350 25,000 15 Ford Park Permits 1,350 2 Colorado Ski Museum Note #2 5.77% 20,000 0 3 Teva Mountain Games Note #3 9.40% gp,p00 0 4 Teva In-Kind Note #3 PD,Bleacher,Trash,etc. 7,640 0 Vail Jazz Foundation/Howard Stone S" Vail Jazz Festival's Labor Da Weekend P t. 1-4, 06 4.50% 6,650 1 Blue Pass 825 15,000 1 Blue Pass 82S 7,500 l Blue Pass 82S Vail Chamber & Business Association VCBA) 15.00% 6 Colorado Snow Sports Expo Note #4 15,347 0 ' 7 LionsHead Passport/Free Gondola Ride Program Nate #4 233,075 0 8 Prenrier Impressions Note #4 9.67% 25,000 41,734 1 Blue Pass 82S 0 9 Vail Gift Card 0 14,700 0 l0 Vail Guide Note #4 9.67% 25,000 36,740 0 11 Vail Loves You Coupon Book 2.07% 5,355 8,345 0 12 Web Site 0 11,555 0 13 Vail Fanners' Market 20.00% 5,000 Traffic, buses, si 2,250 Traffic, buses, si 8000 Traffic, buses, si 8,000 Vail Vall Foundation 14 Birds of Prey (Dec. 1-4, OS) 0.50% ADA & ublic transit 1Q000 ADA & blic transit 14000 ADA & ublic transit 14,000 14 The Session (Snowboard Invitational-Jan 12-15, 06) 0.40% P 2,500 P 3,000 Parlor 3,000 14 4• American Ski Classic (Mar. 22-26, O6) _ Winter Concert Series/Street Beat Note #S 0.20% 7.00% 16,571 P PD & PW s rt 2,500 6,000 28,500 P PD & PW s rt 3,000 6,500 20,000 P PD & PW s 3,000 6,500 4• 4• Vail International Dance Festival Gerald R. Ford hitheater Hot Summer Ni s Nate #5 Vail Valle Chamber & Tourism Bureau 0.10% 23.00% 5.00% 12,500 20,000 PD resence 2,800 22,250 25,000 PD reserrce 2,800 15,000 25,000 PD reserrce 2,800 IS Vail Concierge Nights Program. note 1 5,000 5,000 16 I rove Local Econom Note #6 0 5,000 0 Everus & Information StafY Parkin 6 Blue Passes 4,950 Information Booths Note #7 170675 205,000 17 Lodging Occupancy Forecast Report Note #8 20.00% 10,000 0 18 Secure Commercial Air Serv. to EGE Airpott 10,000 10,000 18 Admin. Costs to mane e ro increased to l2% 1,200 1,200 l9 TOV Cornmuni Host Pro 27 Blue es (Info B. 22,275 7 Blue Passes 4,125 7 Blue asses 4,125 20 Commission on S ial Events Note #9 100.00% 590,000 I Blue Pasc 82S 730,000 l Blue Pass ,825 650,000 I Blue Pass ,;u a~:_',,, ~ ~~.; T r_ - ~ C:_ ~-`~ r - '99}, t2Gl .. .ll Sf, 7S '• 1.43N,44G .... ~, - "' 0~ ~ S~;H911. -~ 'l~(k5.., - -'.p ?i^ ?~` 21 Colorado Mountain Colle a H.E.R.O. Note #10 0.50% 5,000 0 22 Ea le Valle Alliance for Sustainability Note #1 l 8.79% 15,000 Vehicle, Com Dc lic. 5,200 ? Corn.) Use of staffNail 3,000 ? 23 Freedom Park Memorial Committee 4.00% 100,000 0 24 Shaw Outreach Team Cancer Carin House) 3.00% IS,000 0 25 Vail Leadershi Institute (America's Risin Stars) 64.00% 9,000 0 38 Vail S sium cash or Donovan usa e) Note #19 1,500 0 34 Vail Valle Exchan a Note #17 100.00% 6,000 0 26 Vail Valle Institute Note #12 1.50% 2500 _ _ 2,500 2,500 _ ~.. , N_:.. ~. ~-. ~, ~. _ : ` . ~ ' . ~``2 ~~ ' - 0 0 95~Ot1o ~ ~' ,"n' C.:N'-'8~ , ,~~~ slx1 ._~*Ek~~; tic ~ , .~~ .> , ~ Cuh 2006 Gth ~ 7.005 Io-Kind FYn~I ICled. Vdoe ~~ 2006 IaIOod Raga Khd In-Kind I?~I Vitae Cssh In-Kind Value iiT1O r •* -- '__ - - Battle Mountain Hi School Ski Team Note #13 & #l5 5.00% Note 2 500 atkin cou ns 2,500 500 co ns 2,500 Yes ' Battle Mountain Huskies Hoeke Booster Club Note #l4 33.00% 79 hrs. ice, arldn 1Q000 Skatin Club of Vait Dec OS & July 12- l6, 06) Note # l5 7.37% 9 da s of ice 11,891 9 da s of ice 11,891 Yes Ski & Snowboard Club Vail Oct 26-29, 06) Note #15 0.40% 4 da s of ice 5,285 4 da s of ice 5,285 Yes Snowshoe Shuffle-Sarah Ladd (A ril l; 06) 6.00% Parkin 4,000 P 4,000 Yes S ia1O1 ics]an.8,15,22,29,Feb.5,12,19,26,06) 100,00% 70 co ns 1,120 80 co ns 1,280 Yes Vail Junior Hoc Association Note #15 & #16 9 da of ice 11,891 9 da s of ice 11,891 Yes WMC Luncheon/S le Show A . 12, 06 ' ' 3.00% 500-600 1 day __T 4,000 500.600 I da 4;000 Yes a~ ,t~L.y ~` ~ ae' ._ ~ ^c - ~ ~ ,ra '_ _ -_ _~ , 0 ip ' •.u0 ~.' _~ ~ -~1~ . I i - rs ,._ 1' ~o ~~SUBfiO!t`fa~yC`~T'9't;k __ _ 4~..c ~' -~ ~ , ' - ~. 495,61ti -- ~-- - 4(.9d'~ Ix9'2M6 - - -- ..111.937 - L{~6260 - _ _ _ _ 4 ,60rt -- 4nd71~. - + Vail Valle Comm. TViChS 38%of franchise fee) 33.00°/ 57,000 57,000 64,000 C ital I mvement Note #18 8,200 8,200 Youth Reco 'lion Award 7,000 7,000 7,000 Ea le Valle Child Care added 1 l/03) Note #20 8.00°/ 30,000 40,000 30,000 Vail Memorial Park ndowmeM Fund) 50,000 0 Vail Vall Athlete Commission 4,750 4,750 ,7 i..:~(~ANII TOTc~,I. 1huil: Ie~"- ! t, 76 _ _ , _ ~ ' 1,' s.;' '"'l ~ r' -{ ,.. ~'~_ ~f._ 0 ..6v, 5.. Y",*!.."' L __ _. _ _ - Eagle River Watershed/Carolnte Bradford Note #21 100,000 100,000 100,000 Rivet & Corntmuii Pride H Clean U Ford A ine Garclen Foundation Note # 18 13.00'/0 Note #22 50,000 50,000 50,000 Educational Interpretive Stations in the Main Garden 30,000 30,000 Pavers between the main Garden & Children's Garden 20,000 20,000 Pond to-grade & constmction 35,000 Plant Material 5,000 .~10y%y~1contmgency ~ •!Vl ~ 'v.~h~ ~~.. / ,1 .~'."Y L - .~ 4,000 ~. 1~ } v _ Yom. ~_~ ~ _~w[ ~ .1..~_ ~ J~ _ li~'.~. 4 FC,nrdTotal.;"a ,, .,., st°: . _' ],2lSf3~7f 0 9~, _ ~],9d4~4i~ -. O i 111,x37 _ 1 60 ~ _ ~x0 : ~c+~~ 29` 33 35 36 _37 ~ , CONTRIBUTION NOTES General Notes: *Culturally Designated Events 1. #1 -Copy of letter included. 2. #2 -This will be covered in the Parking Structure Budget in 2006. 3. #3 & 4 -Dependent upon CSE Funding. 4. # 6, 7, 8 & 10 -Colorado Snow Sports Expo -Primarily promotes skiing & the sale of ski passes w/retailers selling cheap goods. VRI already has a strong presence on behalf of the town/ski azea. LionsHead PassportlFree gondola Ride Program - No decreased traffic this summer has been noted. Would have the effect of diverting people out of Vail and up onto the mountain. Premier Impressions -Consider joining the VVCTB's program, where businesses are judging themselves through the Platinum Service Award and being "secretly shopped." This is a valley-wide program. Vail Guide -Cost has escalated. Will increase Suzanne's Budget by $20,000 to pursue further opportunities. 5. #14 -Street Beat -Valuable winter event but concert # dropped from 14 to 10 through negotiations with merchants. #14 -Hot Summer Nights -Concert series increased by 2 to 3 (rolled over from the reduction in Street Beat). 6. #16 -Stan will use 2005 dollazs out of the budgeted Economic Development Fund. 7. Information Booths - awazd of contract to Vail Info, Inc. @ $205,000. 8. # 17 -Stan will use 2005 dollazs out of the budgeted Economic Development Fund. 9. #20 -Copy of letter & breakdown included. Did not fund August event, event evaluation/reseazch (suggest every other year), or community events (VRD has agreed to do Halloween & Easter events). 10. #21 -Should read Vail Childcaze Center first, followed by Miller Ranch. 11. #22 -Copy of letter included. Still negotiating. 12. #26 -Will restrict to Vail resident or employee. 13. #27 - 200 remaining from '04-'OS season -Staff will work out. 14. #28 -Council will receive a further clarification from Jerry Sibley on this request. The Booster Club recognized there would be a direct hit on Dobson's bottom line so they had not intended to ask for ice time as their application indicates, but rather, a cash contribution to be paid to VRD to pay the direct expense of their ice time. Staff has talked w/both Kazen Strakbien, RESOJ finance director, and Rich Houghton, BMHS's athletic director. The hockey club was. never a district sponsored athletic team but a pazent initiative. Title 9 prohibits adding another boy's sport to their athletic programming. Four years ago, Vail Junior Hockey signed a 5 year agreement to fund-raise/sponsor this team. They backed out in the spring of'O5, at which time the Battle Mountain Husky Booster Club was formed and entered into another agreement w/the school district, committing themselves to responsibility for 100% of the fund-raising (in the range of $25K to $35K annually). The individual school, in this case BMHS, could opt to fund a portion of the Husky ice time; however, Mr. Houghton said the issue had been discussed 1 ~ w/all athletic divisions and the decision was made not to do so (because the Booster Club had committed to 100% fund-raising). Although not contributing financially, the school assists the team in numerous ways. Staff is now waiting to hear back from Vail Junior Hockey. 1S. #27, 29, 30 & 33 -Must still pay Dobson daily operational "hard costs" which vary between $1,000 to $1,500/day, based on event. Standard daily retail fee is $3500/day. , 16. #33 - VRD lost 2 November revenue weekends in 'OS; therefore, Vail Jr. Hockey will move 2 weekends either into October or back to December. 17. #34 -Withdrew parking pass request. VVE should spend down its fund balance before requesting additional funding. 18. #36 - 2% of the Town's overall S % franchise fee. Voluntary arrangement. Actual 'OS collections are $64K. Please see a-mail description of equipment to be purchased. Will allow "titles" to be inserted "real time" rather then taking up to 24 hours in delay time. 19. #38 -Already co-producing "Speaker Series" through Library sponsorship. 20. #39 -Application included. Additional slot would be purchased @ Miller Ranch. 21. #40 -Copy of letter & application included. 22. #37 -Fund raising for the Betty Ford Tribute breakdown: Ticket Sales & Contributions: $212,875. Expenses $83,000. Balance in Operating Budget $41,267. Rest in an Endowments $88,305. Partnered with VVF and received a $30,000 rental tent. Educational interpretive stations in Main Garden. Based on GOCO grant award of $70K. .~ ~t.~S~~~ v...... - - - DES r~ti~~~. ~~ JOHN ll'. GIO~'ANDO Ecccur<<•<• Di,z•tror Mr. Rod Slifer ~UC1ENl:~ zUK>=R:l•1.-~~; Mayor August 29, 2005 rl,•t~:~t!<• Dirtrtnr Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road BOARD of TRUSTEES Vail, Colorado 81657 Kathleen S. Eck Chairn,ua Dear Rod, Steve Pope t~«•~ c~~i~tirn,~r,t Thank you again for your support of the Bravo! Vail Valley Music Festival. J B The 2005 season concluded with record attendance of over 60 000. Thank you too an roman Tira.uur,• , , , for reviewing our grant request for 2006, seeking renewal of the Town of Vail's support for the residency of the New York Philharmonic and general operating Barbara Treat expenses. Stcrrta,y Adam Aron Enclosed please find the following: Paul Becker Bill Burns 1). 2005 Orchestra Housing Summary Tim Dalton L°~y Davis 2). 2005 New York Philharmonic Residency Revenue and Expense Summary Sallie Fawcett David L. Ferguson cookie Ftaum 3). 2005 Town of Vail Contribution as Percentage of Festival Budget Ceil Folz Led Gardner 4). 2006 New York Philharmonic Housing Plan Linda Hart Farrow Hitt Please feel free to contact us with any other questions or comments, and Liz Keay Alan KosiofE• thank you again for your ongoing contribution to the success of the Bravo! Vail Rob LeVne Valley Music Festival. Patricia Lynch Martha Rehm With best regards, Doug Rippeto ~ 1 Terie Roubos /~ W f~ ~ % ' Oscar Schafer r" ~`~~- ~ ~ Jim Shpall Jo n W. Giovando ~ nne Reid Rod Slifer Executive Director rector of Develo ment Phil Smiley ( p Bill Stolzer Susan Sturm EI]CIOSUreS: Douglas Tansill Karin l~'eber Cc: Diana Donovan Dennis Wentz Kent Logan Betsy lVegers Dick Cleveland Farrow Hitt ' tiL~IL1NG ADDRESS: Kim RUOt010 Post Ollice Box 2270 Greg Moffet Vail, Colorado 31658 Stan Zemler PHYSICAL ADDRESS: Pam BCandmeyer 201 iV[ain Street 1~?inturn, Colorado 8ibi5 Phone: 970.827.5700 Toll Free: 877.827.5700 Fax: 970.827.5707 E-mail: hravoC~vail.net ~ .uRV. vailmusicfestival.org :, 2005 Orchestra .Housing Summary Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra The Festival secured a total of 77 rooms for the RPO for arrival June 26 and departure July 4, 2005 (9 nights): Antlers at Vail Christie Lodge Evergreen Lodge Highlands Lodge Lifthouse Condominiums Lionshead Inn Manor Vail Resort Marriott Mountain Resort Plaza Lodge Simba Run Resort Sonnenalp Resort Vail Cascade Resort & Spa Vail's Mountain Haus Vail Racquet Club Westwind Condos Rooms in Vail Rooms outside Vail Total Purchased Rate 20 7 7 2 8 9 1 8 1 3 1 6 1 7 1 11 ,~~ # Nights Total $ Of the above, a total of 33 rooms were purchased at a discounted rate for a total cost of $22,005 r. Dallas Symphony Orchestra The Festival secured a total of 66 rooms for the Dallas Symphony Orchestra for arrival July 7 and departure July 17, 2005 (10 nights): Total Purchased Rate # Nights Total $ Antlers Lodge 20 20 $80 200 $16,000 Aron Residence 1 Evergreen Lodge 6 Lionshead Inn 9 6 $65 10 3,900 Lifthouse Condominiums 8 The Lodge at Avon Center 5 5 $65 10 3,250 Marriott Mountain Resort 5 Meadows Lodge 1 Simba Run Resort 3 Sonnenalp Resort 1 Vail Cascade Resort & Spa 6 Vail's Mountain Haus 1 Total $23,150 Rooms in Vail 60 Rooms outside Vail 6 Of the above, a total of 31 rooms were purchased at a discounted rate at a total cost of $23,150 20051Veww York Philharmonic mousing Summary The Festival secured a total of 77 rooms for the NY Phil for arrival July 21 and departure July 30, 2005 (9 nights): Purchased Mate # fights Total $ Antlers 30 1 Bed $80 300 $21,600 Antlers 10 2 Bed $150 100 $13,500 Park Hyatt 53 $120 477 $31,005 Marriott 10 $120 90 $10,800 Total $76,905 2005 New York Philharmonic Residency as of August 15, 2005 Income Budget Actual Earned (Ticket Sales) $476,299 $459,931 Unearned (Contributions) 750,000 825,122 In-Kind 200,000 200,000 Total $1,426,299 $1,485,053 Expense Orchestra Fees $500,000 516,200 Concerto Artists/Travel 130,000 98,000 Orchestra Housing 131,700 95,105 Orchestra Equipment Rental 7,333 7,333 Orchestra Promotion 17,500 5,500 Local Orchestra Travel 22,500 13,962 Orchestra Miscellaneous 18,967 3,000 Orchestra Production 12,000 10,000 In-Kind Contributions 200,000 200,000 Bravo Vendor Costs* 550,333 548,300 Total Revenue $1,426,299 1,485,053 Total Expense 1,600,333 1,497,400 Net Result: ($12,347) * Bravo vendor costs include: marketing, national media, facility rental, box office rental, production staff, administration/royalties, fund raising expense, collateral design/printing, salary allocation 2005 Town of Vail Contribution as Percentage of Festival Budget 2005 Town of Vail Contribution New York Philharmonic General Operating Support Total 2005 Festival Budget TOV contribution as °Io of budget: ~e~,~ $95,000 ~ ' ~ ~ (7 21.375 ~ ~~ ,. O C,~ O ~ $116,37 ~- $3,587,500 3.2% 20061Vewr Fork Philharmonic Housing Plan The Festival has secured a total of 110 rooms for the NY Phil for arrival July 20 and departure July 29, 2006: Antlers 35 1 Bed $95 315 $29 925 Antlers 10 2 Bed $165 90 , $14 850 Vail Cascade 60 $75 540 , $40,500 Marriott 5 $120 45 $5,400 Total $90,675 +'./Z-. _ _. . ~. Penny Harpe AddEtional Info f r 2006 Request doc --- - Page `1~ ~_ ,~ ~ m - __-__. - ... _,. _ ,,....~.~ ~..~,w .~ . o ~.~.~,a- ~riw~. ~~ TOWNOF VAIN omm~ss~on on pecra ven MEMO: TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Commission on Special Events (CSE) DATE: August 25, 2005 RE: Additional Information Requested by Council w/respect to 2006 Funding Requests #1: What is the town's share of the organization's total budget? The CSE is funded 100% by the Vail Town Council. Attached you will find a spreadsheet illustrating the CSE's 2005 funding allocations as a percentage of total event budgets. This year, for the first time, Eagle County contributed $6000 toward the fireworks display at America Days. A request has already been filed seeking to renew this contribution for 2007. #3: Community Events, eg. Trick or Treat, Easter Egg, Community Festival, New Year's Eve for kids...why does council now have an additional funding request from CSE? What programs have been discontinued? The VRD has stated that it no longer has the budget available to produce the Family Carnival, Trick-or-Treat Trot or the Easter Egg Hunt. The New Year's Eve program was cancelled by the VRD, the Vait Police Department, Vail Resorts and the CSE on account of low attendance. The Vail Police Department will be looking to the CSE to help recreate a family friendly "151 Night" celebration on the new plaza in Lionshead in 2007. The CSE is requesting funding earmarked for these types of "local" events because, although they do not fall directly within the CSE's mission of stimulating the local economy, the members sense that these events serve an important community purpose. The CSE has chosen to list this request separately in order to receive guidance from the Town Council as to whether it should fund these activities and/or seek out other entities to produce them. #7: TEi'A Mountain Games discussion re: "icon"status and how appropriate funding is achieved The CSE believes that their purpose is to develop a comprehensive event strategy and to serve as the single point of contact for all events within the Town of Vail. Without oversight of all events, fulfilling this mission is difficult. Over the last 3 years, the CSE has come to realize that the philosophy of "seed" funding (decreasing funding over a 3-5 year period to stimulate the establishment of an event) is innately flawed. As an event grows and develops an identity with Vail, it is important that funding be continued both to ensure that the event does not migrate to another community and to send the message to outside sponsors that the community is supportive of the activity. This outlook will be reflected in the updated CSE Strategic Plan, which is SC~:;sn Itispi7rr;r t<> Counci3 Clui'stic~~~, I'sec I f>f2 Ri:: ~fl{3(+ Fur3.tittg Rectrri;si . ~... _,_. -~ , a. ~- ~ ._ t,~ _M.. ~ -._ s Penny Harpe -Additional Info for 2006 Request.doc i ~..~ , .-~ ~__ ~ w.,.x~, , ~.~~ ~:.:r~:L.-,~.ti.~r, .~ ~ ~ ti ~,,.a ~. _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ ____ ~- __ _ . currently being developed and which is scheduled to be adopted before the end of the year. The plan will reflect the CSE's position that event funding should be allocated based on an assessment of the value of the event to the local economy. It is important to recognize that concepts such as "Icon" Event Status and "seed funding" are not part of the ordinance which defines the CSE, but are addressed only in the Strategic Plan. By definition, from the CSE 2002-2005 Strategic Plan, '`loon (events that are highly souiitt-after] lcctn e~'cnf are national / ;nternati{>nal in scopk 41nd are likely tc7 contain prafessicmal ar (.)I}'mpic- level performer,. "I"hey represent tl7e top Ie~e1, :~ ~erfot•ttiattce or competition in their rategory° an<l generate Lvidespread br.3nd exlu~sttre ul k ~. i~ ;1 of te3evision, broad public awareness (often crossing itttc,rnatianal l~otindaries}and pos !` r a ~ ti ended tnarkettng and I'.R plan. lcctn events bring a lat•~,e participant base e•~•ith tl7em, s.~ ,;-~~;~ , .. ~vrect spendmt~, .end generate 4pecxator nErrnbcrs th~~t meztstrrably impact ~~aiE"s ~{F ~i:; •;~t_~ i~~~- are secured ihrfxt~h targeted 'y identi{7catiott at3d negotiation attd requi''~ ~•z;~~i' ~~~~twestnient fi•r,m the t~>r-profit sector." `~ ~' Clearly the TEVA Games me t the definition of a~ "icon" event. The policy question confronting the Council this year wi~i respect to the `I'EVA~Games is: Should the CSE continue to oversee all events, or when an event. h~.5 reached "icon'' status, should it apply directly to the Town Council for funding? The CSE welcomes the Go~ncil'~ direction in response to this question. `+ ~, ;'~ ~~ ~' ~ ~~ `r 1 ,~ ~~1. 1 ,~ .~ +~ !~ .1 `. :; ~. _ ,\ - - ,, `, . ~ ~, _ ,f'; '-~ , `~ - _ _ -- -- rcr... _i`(i~,~uYia3iFk ..,,.Ea .. J ,.. 9'enny Harpe - 05CSE%~of Budgets XLS yL`__ ~___ ~~_J_y~.4____~_~~_ Town of Vail: Commission on S ecial Events 2005 Fundin A llocations as % of Total Event Bud ets f=unds Available: 596 000.00 • 2005 Dates: Funding ~nrarded: otal Event Budget: SE's % of Event Budget: ktoberfest/Highline Sports eva Mountain Games Sep 9-11 & 16-18 un 1-5 $ 65,000.00 65,000.00 $ 205,000.00 684,816.00 32% 9% ail Film Festival Mar 31- A r 3 60,000.00 742,500.00 8% merica Days ~ -Jul 56,000.00 82,000.00 68% ummer Street Entertainment un 24-Se 4 50,000.00 50,000.00 100% rin Back to Vail r 4-16 40,000.00 459,150.00 9% ourmet on Gore 3-Sep 25,000.00 45,000.00 56% olidays in Vail* (WCTB in '03) Nov 25-Dec 18 25,000.00 25,000.00 100% ick-It 3v3 Soccer Tour u 5-7 25,000.00 61,800.00 40% merican Ski Classic Mar 16-20 20,000.00 1,215,500.00 2% he Graze at Vail 5-Jun 20,000.00 29,450.00 68% he Session an 12-16 18,000.00 757 500.00 2% ardi Gras Vail Feb 5-8 15,000.00 57,400.00 26% ail Arts Festival u 19-21 15,000.00 65,000.00 23% ail Jazz Festival (at the Market) ul 3-Sep 5 8,500.00 21,500.00 40% ail Lacrosse Shootout 4 Jun-4 Jul 8,000.00 142,000.00 6% ail Film Festival: Summer Screenings 18-Jul 7,600.00 19,000.00 40% in of the Mountain Volle ball un 16-19 7,500.00 28 750.00 26% aste of Vail pr 6-9 5,000.00 179,100.00 3% TriAmerica Series: Avon to Vail Triathlon -Sep 3,000.00 74,000.00 4% ionshead Easter E Hunt 7-Mar 1,000.00 3,000.00 33% ubtotal: Event Funds $539,600.00 4 947 466.00 - 11% dministrative Contracts: % of CSE Budget: dministrative +Expenses $ 35,000.00 6% vent Recruitment 0% esearch/Event Evaluation 20,000.00 4% ubtotal: Admin. Contracts $ 55,000.00 10% OTAL ALLOCATIONS: 594 600.00 UNDS 12EINAINING: $ 1 400.00 These events are the result of the Event cruitment Progra / --._.~~ I ,,_ ~- `` ~~~5 ~~' ~ __~...~ Eagle Valley Alliance for,'Sustainability "Eagle County Recycles" Proposal Executive Summary Recycling in Eagle County has always been a challenge. The market for recyclables has not been favorable, community support has been strong but uncoordinated,, town and county. efforts have been non-collaborative and, perhaps most importantly, there has been a lack of vision towards an organized effort. For the past number of years Eagle County has been the only local entity to invest to any considerable degree in a community recycling solution. That solution has been a contract to have material hauled from seven drop-off sites throughout the Eagle Valley. As an unstaffed and unmanaged program, the county's effort has reached its potential for growth and effectiveness. Without greater, investment there is little to no potential to increase diversion or narticitZatiori rat~e~. nr mo°~e olher`recvctfin`~ at~eriiat vec ~r'a "~'-"" material are also issues concerning clean i`T°~ness awn safety of a sites and o~ cf" orb' nation of the material. As mentioned, challenges to recycling here have existed and do exist. But a number of critical variables have changed to create an unprecedented opportunity to invest in a robust recycling program. These changes include more favorable markets for commodities, more efficient hauling solutions and visionary leadership. The Eagle Valley Alliance for Sustainability is a community organization working for the economic and social sustainability of Eagle County through greater resource efficiency. We believe many "green" initiatives have the potential to operate as self-sustaining businesses if will and investment are appropriately applied. Conditions now exist to make this true for recycling as well. After studying recycling in our community, we believe the Alliance is in an ideal position to lead a renewed recycling program. Without increasing the county's investment, the Alliance can take over management of the existing drop-off sites and, with modest effort and some changes, increase participation and diversion rates and keep the sites cleaner and safer. As a nonprofit community organization, the Alliance also has greater potential for enhanced funding, community involvement, and program growth and improvement. In short, there is no longer a limit to the recycling program's potential. Once established in this role the Alliance can further enhance the program by accep~g more types of materials, offering educational programs to schools, providing v~nf services, helping to establish other recycling programs (such as in Eagle and Gyps ,creating other diversion programs (such as community compost). ,~ 1 .,:d°" Recycling is generally viewed as an altruistic "green" practice - i.e. "It's good for ~ ~ ,`"the environment." The recycling industry, however, exists solely for the sake of the greenback. The Eagle Valley Alliance sees itself as intermediary and facilitator of both these objectives. While helping our community to express its sense of civic pride through environmental stewardship, the Alliance also seeks to maximize the economic potential of recyclable resources. We believe that approaching recycling from an entrepreneurial, business perspective, rather than a purely charitable perspective, makes the endeavor more viable in the long-term and, therefore, more beneficial to the community. ~~ , ~r~ ! /JY-ry~~d ii11 a ~--~. Operational Summary The first-year.operational strategy of Eagle County Recycles (project's working name) is simple: take over management of the existing county operation and improve its performance. Currently, seven drop-off sites throughout the valley accept commingles (glass, metal, plastics), newspaper and cardboard. The Vail site also accepts office paper and magazines. All of these sites are hauled and, to some degree, managed by Waste Management, Incorporated. Primary first-year objectives of Eagle County Recycles are to: 1. Increase diversion rates 2. Increase participation rate 3. Maintain appearance of sites 4. Establish recognition and support within the community We will achieve these objectives by: 1. Eliminating 2-4 sites to improve operating efficiencies. 2. Supervising sites to keep them clean and orderly and to remove and prevent contamination. 3. Creating better and more standardized signing. 4. Hauling bins on demand rather than by schedule. 5. Developing informational campaign to promote use of available (but underutilized) curbside alternative and to create awareness and promote greater use of the sites. As mentioned above, a key first-year objective is to establish Eagle County Recycles as a community organization. The current county recycling solution has reached its potential for the current level of investment. Once established, however, Eagle County Recycles can work towards a number of other objectives for capturing recycling and for generating revenue. Some of these may include... 1. Event recycling -provide turnkey solutions for recycling at special events. 2. Accept a much greater number of recyclables throughout the valley, including office paper and magazines, batteries, electronics, paperboard and others. 3. Facilitate other recycling solutions in the valley, such as curbside service for the towns of Eagle and Gypsum. 4. Other waste solutions such as composting, commercial hauling and construction site recycling. 5. Opening and operating a materials recovery facility (MRF) in Eagle County. 6. Numerous grant opportunities both within and outside the Eagle County community. . Market conditions for recycling in Eagle County have changed in important ways. This new market can now support an organization that can itself influence market conditions. If ever there was a time for a concerted effort from within our community to make recycling a success, it is now. From: "Vail Valley Community Television Channel 5" <vailchan5@comcast.net> To: "Pam Brandmeyer" <PBrandmeyer@vailgov.com> Date: 08/25/2005 10:46:13 AM Subject: TV 5 Equipment Hi Pam, In response to your question, the following is a list of equipment that TV 5 needs in order to be fully digital. Grass Valley Server: Currently holds 42hrs of program material. TV 5 will need to purchase an additional upgrade for memory space, so that the Vail Town Council meetings along with other special events, currently running on analog can be transferred and aired digitally. This upgrade is needed due to the increase of time per meeting. Sony Digital Tape Deck: This will eliminate transferring time by half. For example, if a Vail Town Council meeting's length time is 6 hours, the transfer time to air will take 18 hours. If TV 5 purchases this Sony Digital Tape Deck, then a 6 hour meeting will take real time, 6 hours, to transfer, allowing TV 5 to edit and air in a timely manner. Thanks, Rich ~ ~ ~~- G~ ~~ ~, APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ~ applications must be submitted to the Town of Vail by Fri. July 29, 2005 by 5:00 P.M.. You provide 12 copies of the application. Any application received after that date or an a must with fewer than 12 copies will not be considered. Y pplication packet Please send application to: Town of Vail Penny Harpe, Accounting Tech. 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 For questions on the financial statements, please contact Penny Harpe at 479-2100. 1 • Name of org/anization: /? 2• Contact person: ~l ~ ~ c`~qT"~ d •''~ 3• .Mailing address: 4. Telephone: ~ ~'2~-3T~-~ ~j 5• E- ail address: ~ Z 6• Members and Titles f our overnin C (r~r ~ti f~i n,~ ~i g g board: j _ To v z. ~ c_ T~ ~ki ,~,~ ~uc9~ c~, \ . 7. ~ vv~C ~eaq C~c'~ t'~'rte.~~y 6CL2.rV~~ 2 ~tvNni . J~ . ~ - ~Ca ,~~ Amount o contribution reques~e~ ~'~'4r~'~'= ~~s ~C~ v 8• Organization fiscal year-end: ~~~ ~ r 9. Are your books audited? NO 10. How will the contribution be used? ~SvPv~,ZT t,C4 ~ ~ CCf ~ c..;v C~+~r` ~ N~~,~ 11. How does your request support item 1C of the contribution policy? 1/q, ~L. C'r.~~ L~ ~rL ~z`~Z f.S %~ 4~?C 1~.4<L . 12. Who currently funds your or v etc. ? ganization (other governments, private donations, user fees, 13. Or~ anization's mission statement: (If more room is needed to answer questions, please use the b~tof ~~`~~ u~ 5 page.) 3 EVCCA The Business Partner Concept "A private/public Partnership" OVERVIEW: Working families cannot work without child care. Accordingly, young child care and development is a business matter. WHO IS THE CUSTOMER? The customer is not just the child and the family, but the sponsoring employer. WHY FOCUS ON EMPLOYERS? Employers have a longer term stake in assuring a sustainable child care system. Children and families utilize the system and move on. Employers, on the other hand, must look to the next employee in a labor market which in Eagle County will continue to tighten. This tightening is driven by local growth and substantial competition, particulazly from Gar£eld County. It is exacerbated by "Boomers" leaving the pool. In this environment employers who partner in child care have a competitive advantage. THE WIN/WIN: In exchange for a commitment to buy an annual child space paid in advance i installments, the employer receives priority wait listing rights for all future anantici~ated needs as long as "business partner".status is continuously maintained: p spaces become available, an active business partner has the option to purchase anothere space. Business partner priority is based on the date they became a business partner. The Center gains in this relationship, receiving 3-months cash tuition in advance providing a predictable revenue stream. The employer has the flexibility to determine how much the employee pays for the child care space; ie; whether to underwrite a ortio of the cost and not require full reimbursement thus providing more affordable child cazen The un-reimbursed portion may then be taken as a credit under the Colorado Child Caze Tax Credit Act. Also, the employer may utilize an IRS 125 system to allow emplo ees to pay on a pre-tax basis providing additional savings, y FINANCIAL: With multiple centers under EVCCA management located strategically throw out th County, pricing consistency can be maintained within the system; ie; Business Partners pay the same average rate regat'dless of the center location. Eag1o Ysllay ChIW:~gro Awocietlon lsalancq sheyt ~N1Y37,:,~006•_ ~. i:wrent Assets Gash C-aall;ln Bank _ Ctg Petty Ctwh; ' iotal,~~ Kcr:ounts Ftecelva0le Accougta R9cefvaWa M1scetl~yrepyy'~iYQUIb ~Y~I/>ldvpnaeB . ToW,~,,n4-ivat~ 1 atal ~Yr :rte q~ts Mlurgi Assets 'i~~~14s Cerpot & Tfla 1 otul Fixed, g. i l.ia6Ultlos and Fund.EyWty ' Accounts Payable F.P. Pgrpnt ~61e:Aae Hardware '~' ` FP t 6CgpR~ Water FP P~r9nt FP R '81rler erenl Peyal~;TOV F~ t PaYab+a:Val G~scede PayPe11Wit Rey~gq~;yyAOC p~~ " insurence 't utW.L.IaWUti~e k'uud Equity ~ ~~SI;Ftuld'Balance 1 ut~t:~ +hq Fund Equity Srx, accon~ying accountant's report. 33.894 48,660 41,7@81 43,486 63 0 ~ 0 ~o'~ 4,548 7,0171 15,215 597 400 1St 161 4,588 1,281 1b11 1,661 4225 6,47b 3.700 1.180 Alen ,,,, 6,971 7,832 5r2D7 (1.540 ~ 781 ~ a ^ Pape 1 Printed: 08h 7/05 L. ~ - . Laglo Y&IIgy.Fhlld Caro pso~ation sfx+temant hfjA~ctlrltlav ~'°"!'` duly 31, 2005 Fi d o u Actual 1 Actual 1?/31/03 Actual +u91 fDb Prol~ctod V~O~ YTD a YTD Actual Variance Pavorrble Month Bud at Youth A t Varlanco n It van uea pll~ p c ual F+vorabta An-waiRattnera -3876 g7r~las OVt/S1lO6 1{lptelcst! pona8tptlg ~ Grunts 14.677 12,000 20.083 8.017 52,280 4 713 B3,000 48.000 (14,000) 38,750 28,760 (7 000) 5 250 Cunt~iliuGops-TOV &tP Irtaprno~Iwa tl r!d 896 800 9 132 , 0 1500 48,162 1,500 46,ts2 0 2e ezz ,2 as eos , 988 , 125 5,250 165 p 40 a wara • .BF?.Inocr~~~;~~-i8B0 10,Opp . tosoo 7.4!10 70,372 13,040 10 50D 13.040 0 , 18.040 , 13'040 8,988 0 3,840 0 11,44b 7.698 6t? inconp)~C.HD : ®F? lpopma;~RyyJ 6,212 500 12 17,340 5 16 ~.~ , 2],120 10,500 21,120 0 0 7,875 12 320 7,875 0 2.825 0 2,825 0 0 , , yq BPdrtaomajgi~`_ , 22,600 . 0 7 886 p 1 0 0 , 12,320 0 1,780 1.780 0 . ; ' f~?! incQt~'pQY ' 10,000 . 10,900 0.600 10,500 10,500 10 b00 10,500 10 500 0 7.876 7 76 .8 0 0 0 2 826 2.825 7 876 2,82b ~ InoomatVal6C~cada ' 'HC' Incgtpa;VVA1C" ~ 22,600 13 212 30,000 20 800 31.600 , 31,600 , 81,600 0 0 7'876 ~ ~ 7.876 0 , 2,826 , 7,876 5,260 6,250 iiP Incorr~e;C~pq~s , 7.600 , 10.300 8.777 10 600 10.600 10 500 (10.600) ~ ~•~ 0 (7 876) 7,87b 2 825 (7.875) ~elatretigit ~ , , 10 500 7,876 7 76 8 . 0 , 2,826 0 Tuilinn.lnp4mp.anf@nts " 1,535 700 Z00 3 8,100 8,100 , 6 ?AO 6 260 2.826 0 (2,625) '1'uidpm p~~ 4tttgrnq,.~ Tt4tion ~~., 7b d ~~ 50,818 21 024 50,174 45 42,824 00 97,224 2,OOD 62,178 1.700 24 865 100 21 7 , 1,530 , 1,480 0 2,b50 i,130 2,650 1 130 dt ers ~ ~~~' , 63,313 D 42.068 ~ ~ 80,884 68,000 , (4.984) , 14 35.574 37,714 32 2y4 18,000 3,102 8,183 . 3,081 ~. Tgtgl~qw<t~,upy 21 ~.~ 38,500 (10.132) 28,862 , 21,941 (9~) (7 011) 5,082 4 138 3,826 (1,257) ' '=Noiaannel Exp 287506 281787 919 S7 S 81 0 1 0 0 , D . 0 1.628 0 (2,810) 0 o ::, AdmgUarr ~ 7 72 k 301 67 488 73188 .: Rdgulgr:M~ ~ltxwa Pay Q v 6 "'! 48.885 745.188 55,836 168,006 88.774 177 g g5 '~ 000 x 88,000 (4,000) 48.583 55 439 ( a ert t4e _~ Yro01'a1~ 3 083 1850 • 188,000 0 12,000 0 118.683 . 111.847 7,038) 17,083 9426 23 830 (2,342) ': M~ratth lnae~rantsa . 18,817 5,584 18,244 5,800 21 550 0 4.000 {4,000) 0 p 0 388 2 0 0 . ~ (8.853) p Worke~'a Gnmp`Ineurance Eta~~+r!lpil~~g8t 0 9 074 8,132 9 5 . 6,473 27.986 18,000 27.598 10.000 388 8 000 18•~ . 15,040 (2,388) 1,285 0 2.332 27 2 783 (277) .. (~1~, . 526 , 78 2•~1 .4.082 1 428 4794 8 , ~ 10,600 2 798 4,S3B 1 8 5 176 1 , ~ (451) Sul?WEus $, EHul 217 72 . 4A73 4.073 9B9 , 0 2,378 , 21 .1.685 1. 811 399 338 0 170 398 R9w~t Uftjce d,:R9p~ 12 201183 1 28 73B ' -S7 234 189 8 ~ROratL~j ~' ~ 1.811 1.417 1.226 496 CIc~aN g 1 ~ 1.713 028 1 1.852 2 1~ 00 1,700 0 0 788 ~ B12 (126) 113 17 F`~'~Pettso .. Uffitre ~qu~tel7t Mai t 1,85y 1 824 . 583 .825 1.185 2.250 ~ 2.250 80D 0 1.313 1,458 1,8¢4 (488) (342) 142 188 2 86 ( t) : n ertance ~ ...,.. ~•::PerentAla>itri . 2,0~ 888 874 1.170 1.100 1,10D 0 0 487 891 ) (185 87 28 7B ie l:duca 1, ilorr~ ~qu)pment 0 240 425 425 p 842 944 {3D2) 92 3 (B) t'l`'~r°!tr+d:Equipment 0 300 300 0 248 0 248 36 p (Z ) 1,5 1' 36 1mp~" G9rPet and 771 0 358 b00 ~ 0 875 0 876 125 25 e '~'ok-1, 9up~ ~, Equlprrwnt 0 0 0 292 0 ~ 42 0 0 125 , ~c~ ~auxirgpanY+08 accountant's report 8 11 7 0 825 4.600 14 (4,600) 800 0 790 4,588 0 (4,588) 0 0 p 4.688 42 0 (4 699) . 1 188 4 10 827 5337 , 4 610 Page 2 ~:udls.VaUey,lChlld Care Aasoclatlon Sitatwnent of,Aotlvltlea • ;&avan,!. „ , , @rrged July 31, ZOOS ~~+ `. - k'+wuhased Services Membersttlp Quee,B tiubsarlptions t.icmtse@ 8~'Feas' ., ' Stafl Re4ci~pgp,6~:Vlaea uwwe$" , :..~ l't~l4phW19 Gull PhOno . Intemat E1Spense' Gatnrioit Maintenance .Insura~eI.igf~glgr ~ind.0&O •Malntananae'Expw~ea water Qe~rrwge t~prir ...Snow.Renwgal'` :GlHaning $ervlc0 .GredltGefq~ISaea BuokkeoPinp ;: l3anlt,5iarv)oa"Gharge.Feos Profesaki!lel'a c~~nen~.r~ae `fW~al t'!!r~p[n!iwMl Selrvlcas i° ° S~aff•~!Pp~ 8tatP. • mart 1'raval. ~' ! SWff, ARdiv~4es ToW1.8t9~FTatlpport tither liud.Uoht t_xpense :r.t~thpr Net lncwne;(Loec) From Operadon4 Gapitali,7atian.rrf•Iweats • kcvOinngrp g,Fund Balance t3nd41g; Fund Balance Scw accoytpanydt-g accountant's report. Projected Variance YrD YTD Variance Monihlaa t Nonth t l Varlanco Fe AoWal Actud ~ AcLtal Budget 1ZtS1A6 Actual 12I91lOS FavorabM Budget 071108 Actual FaYOraWe Budge w 6 ~3 387 457 974 b25 525 0 906 350 (44) 44 0 D 44 16 122 888 185 330 110 1 083 185 1 000 185 1,000 0 0 108 503 O 880 108 (277) 15 83 1D9 (28) p 3,088 2.850 . 2,083 , 0 2,400 0 1,750 0 850 0 1,400 1,001 0 899 0 200 144 D ~ 42 257 b56 285 S00 (33) 593 282 (39) 826 42 0 28 4 32 871 995 985 395 0 225 208 22 32 0 0 0 0 7.753 8,197 8,200 6,801 1,388 8,200 8,801 1,598 D 0 2,284 2,989 2,620 2,200 2,200 0 0 0 876 0 427 0 448 0 12b 0 125 693 1,589 87b 1,600 1,b00 0 0 0 0 2,61o fl 1 000 o .2,OOD 0 (1,000) 0 800 0 1,623 (823) 0 0 D 2,1b0 683 3,845 1 989 720' 2,802 , 1,600 2,600 0 2,800 1,600 0 8TS 1,693 0 2,247 '876 ,(819) 125 233 0 404 12b (171) 6,878 , 8.780 t0,OD0 10,000 10,400 (400) 8,000 5,844 166 1,200 834 388 49 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,019 888 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 185 28 613 21987 18 1T5 100 1 618 580 0 1,582 876 1,581 1,500 1,500 0 876 .518 3S7 12b 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 331 402 99 900 300 0 1T5 0 17b 25 D 25 1889 1 1584 1 1 0 0 1 618 682 1S0 0 1b0 0 1,738 0 0 521 (621) 0 521 (621) 0 0 0 0 1798 0 0 621 621 0 821 '.621 0 0 0 260188 284162 326 696 772 87 768 1 018 T 91 814 44 080 12 78 7 7 11 8 7 162 778 12ti27 1 487 13 379 882 4,600 (4,800) 4,599 ~ 4,689 (4,688) 268 7,632 8,207 (1,648) (1.548) 0 (1.548) (1.848) (0) (4,188) 12,440 16,834 Z 7 1546 88 8 18 5152 25829 8 8 288 26824 17 526 Pago 3 ^ Eagle River ~° Watershed Council August 24, 2005 Stan Zemler Manager, Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Stan: y~ First, let me thank you for your support during the Council work session last week. Council's questions on financial details prompted me to include more financial data in my presentation to the County Commissioners earlier this week. Recognizing the Town of Vail's support, the Commissioners agreed to fund our outstanding 2005 request for work on Black Gore Creek. This is set to be approved on the next consent agenda. These matching funds will enable our current demonstration project in the beaver pond at 187.9, to proceed as planned this fall. Along with the TOV's support and encouragement, I am confident Eagle County will include funding support for the Black Gore Creek work in their 2006 budget process. Secondly, I appreciate your awareness of the complexities of working with the EPA, CDPHE and the TMDL process. I constantly strive for balance between too much and too little information in the areas of technical data and project finance details. With so many partners and details, it is easy to confuse or overlook something. It not my intention to do either. Please confirm the following information answers all of your questions. In addition, I am putting together a packet of details for the 2006 budget request. The Eagle River Watershed Council's 2005 total budget is $349,000. From 2001 through 2005, a total of $122,000, (or an average of $24,000 per year) was spent on ERWC administration for Black Gore Creek projects. Of this, $30,000 was from Eagle County with the balance from TOV monies. This translates to approximately 35% of our total staff time spent working on the Black Gore Creek issue. (The Watershed Council has 2 full time and 1 part time employees.) Each year, $70,000 from TOV is dedicated to Black Gore Creek contractors for design and construction of capitol projects on the pass, aquatic life monitoring and TMDL development process. These funds are highly leveraged with 319 Grants, ERWSD and CDOT funds to carry out work on Vail Pass. The majority of expenses occur in late summer and fall of each year, with the construction of sediment basins and monitoring work. The Eagle River Watershed Council advocates for the health and conservation of the Upper Colorado and Eagle River basins through education, research and projects. We provide a forum in which everyone can participate and gain a greater understanding of the Eagle River environment. Tel. 970-827.5406 Office: 82 Benchmark Blvd., Ste 203 Avon Mail: P.O. Box 10 Red Cliff, CO 81649 bradfoMOeagleriverwatershedcouncil.org All capitol projects on Vail Pass using TOV funds have been contracted through the ERWSD. In most years, these funds are paid directly by TOV to ERWSD without passing through the Watershed Council. In some cases, the construction funds from TOV have passed through our budget and accounts. These funds were then.paid in full to ERWSD to disperse to contractors (i.e. Hydrosphere and American West). Copies of invoices from ERWSD with detailed project costs are available upon request. I have attached one of the 319 BGC Grant summaries. These are submitted twice a year to the Nonpoint Source Council/CDPHE. In the future, I will continue to forward copies of grant summaries to TOV as they are submitted. At first glance it appears that a disproportionate amount of TOV funds are spent for the Watershed Council to focus on this issue. This is not the case. TOV and Eagle County funds are used to help with Eagle River Watershed's administrative costs. I trust Council realizes that the other partners who fund the capitol projects are NOT contributing to these costs. (Can anyone really imagine CDOT helping to fund the Watershed Council's staff time - to hold them accountable?) We are especially proud of the ability to leverage TOV's $100,000 per year into over $4.5 million total in spending in the past five years from Eagle County, CDOT, ERWSD, and 319 grant funds. In other words, only $122,000 in ERWC staff time and administration over five years has resulted in these impressive results. Eagle County Commissioners have pledged their support for our special demonstration project. We are finalizing the contracts for this work. I have enclosed payment invoices # 2 and # 3, for the remaining portions of the 2005 contribution from the Town of Vail to the Eagle River Watershed Council for Black Gore Creek. Both the underground basin project and the beaver pond project will be underway in September. Thank you for processing these invoices and for all the help and support provided by the Town of Vail in this work. If you or any Members of the Council have any questions, please feel free to call me: (office) 827-5406 or (cell) 688-0812. Thanks so much for your support on behalf of the health and conservation of the Gore Creek watershed. Kind regards, Caroline Bradford Executive Director Enclosures CC ~ ~~~Z ~~~~~ The Eagle River Watershed Council advocates for the health and conservation of the Upper Colorado and Eagle River basins through education, research and projects. We provide a forum in which everyone can participate and gain a greater understanding of the Eagle River environment. Tel. 970-827408 Office: 82 Benchmark Blvd., Ste 203 Avon Mail: P.O. Box 10 Red Cliff, CO 81649 bradford~eagleriverwatershedcouncil.org APPLICATION FOR 2006 TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING ,,-- ~~ 1. EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL 2. Caroline Bradford, Executive Director 3. Mail: P.O. Box 10 Red Cliff, CO 81649 Office: 82 East Beaver Creek Blvd. Suite 203, Avon CO 81620 4. 970-827-5406 5. Email:Bradford@eagleriverwatershedcouncil.org 6. Mr. Joe Macy, President, Fishing guide, Retired, Governmental Affairs, VRI Ms. Arlene Quenon, Vice President, Retired lawyer and association executive Ms. Kerry Donovan, Vail Valley Foundation, marketing and special events Ms. Anne Esson, Naturalist, Retired United Way Director Mr. Bill Heicher, Open Space Coordinator, Town of Eagle, Retired Division of Wildlife Mr. Dave Mott, Retired Civil Engineer Mr. Bill Perry, Owner, Fly Fishing Outfitters Dr. Tom Steinberg, Retired Physician and water quality specialist 7. River Clean Up (400+volunteers) $500 Community Pride Highway Clean Up (950+volunteers) $500 Black Gore Creek Staff/administration $30,000 Monitoring & TMDL Development (Due 06) $19,000 Matching funds for sediment projects $50,000 $99 000 Real Estate Transfer Taz 2006 TOTAL REQUEST FOR ERWC ACTIVITIES $100,000 8. Fiscal Year End: December 31 9. Audit: Yes, for 2005 (alternating years) 10. The Town of Vail contribution to the Eagle River Watershed Council ensures the environmental health of Black Gore Creek continues to be a top priority for the millions of dollars in funding needed to solve the problem created by traction sand. We are working with the members of the Black Gore Steering Committee to 1. Implement capitol projects that remove sediment from the stream, 2. Implement capitol projects that control sediment sources ("best management practices") and 3. To participate in the development of the "Total Maximum Daily Load" of sediment that will be allowed to enter the stream without negatively affecting the aquatic life in the stream. We coordinate the activities and communication of appropriate officials in a wide variety of agencies and organizations that have a relationship to this issue. We strive to find the substantial resources needed to address the problem annually and over the long term. These funds will also be used by the Eagle River Watershed Council to more effectively focus on communicating this important message to those individuals and organizations throughout Colorado and Washington, D.C. who are involved in potentially funding the solution. For the continued economic health of Vail in winter, we must ensure that Interstate 70 over Vail Pass stays open during winter storms. This is accomplished by a myriad of related management activities, including the use of traction sand. This economic imperative must be balanced by the impacts of thousands of tons of traction sand on the fragile environment of Black Gore and Gore Creek through Vail. Of prime importance is the storage capacity of Black Lakes that is being impacted by the accumulation of sand in the reservoirs. In addition, Gore Creek's Gold Medal Fishery must be protected from the impacts of sedimentation caused by migration of traction sand downstream during the spring and fall spawning seasons. This suffocates the eggs and kills a future Gold Medal trout, a significant source of related summer tax revenues. 11. The Eagle River Watershed Council works to ensure a positive sustained economic climate with an environmentally sensitive high quality of life by striving to address the Black Gore Creek rehabilitation issue in a positive, collaborative way, preventing further degradation of natural resources. ERWC strengthens bonds of the residents of the community through hands on community service opportunities such as the spring Community Pride Highway Clean Up and the Fall River Clean Up. These projects increase awareness of the importance of good stewardship of our environment. They also create positive media attention for the environmental leadership of the Town of Vail. In 2006, we will work to ensure the Vail Clean Up and the Community Pride Highway Clean Up are tightly coordinated in a way that complements and enhances the Vail event. 12. Current financial supporters of Eagle River Watershed Council A. 100% Board member participation in fund development B. Individual and business contributions from throughout the community C. Businesses and organizations that regularly fund Eagle River Watershed Council: • Beaver Creek Resort Company • Berry Creek Metro District • Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment • Colorado River Water Conservation District • Colorado Watershed Protection Tax Check Off Fund • Cordillera Metro District • Eagle County • Eagle River Water & Sanitation District • Eagle Vail Metro District • First Banks • Great Outdoors Colorado • Singletree Homeowner's Association • Town of Avon • Town of Eagle • Town of Gypsum • Town of Vail • Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority • Vail Eagle Valley Rotary Club • Vail Resorts, Inc. D. Significant sources of matching funds and services that enable our projects to be implemented include EPA, CDOT, DOW, USFS, CDPHE and others. 13. The Eagle River Watershed Council advocates on behalf of the Upper Colorado and Eagle River basins through education, research and projects. We provide a forum where everyone can participate and gain a greater understanding of the Eagle River environment. APPLICATION FOR 2006 TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING FOR 'r EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL Statement of Sources and Uses Current Fiscal Year Budget Revenues: Individual contributions $60,000 Local businesses and organizations $50,000 Foundation contributions and grants $30,000 Government contributions and grants $204,000 State/Federal government contributions and grants 18 000 $g62,oo0 Expenses: Revenue -expenses = $12,600.00 CODES DESCRIPTION 2005 Budget 200o All staff expenses total $i5o,oo0.00 2001 Director $52,000.00 2002 Admin. Assistant $40,000.00 2003 Project Manager $20,000.00 2004 Payroll w holding $85,000.00 2005 Benefits $3,000.00 300o Office rent $i5,ooo.oo 310o Telephone $3,800.00 320o Supplies $6,000.00 330o Copies-Printing $4,000.00 3400 Postage Delivery $i,5oo.00 350o Photography $500.00 360o Web site $3,000.00 3~0o Dues $2,500.00 380o Meeting room fees $600.00 400o Prof/Admin $5,000.00 410o Prof /Technical $io,ooo.oo 420o Prof Development $i,5oo.00 4300 Mileage-Travel $ i,8oo.00 4400 Insurance $i,3oo.00 450o Misc. $o.oo 500o Food /beverage $3,000.00 5ioo Entertainment $2,000.00 600o Gen project exp. $500.00 6ioo Black Gore Capitol $60,000.00 620o Research $60,000.00 6goo Mktg & Comm. $i,6oo.00 640o Paid Advertising $800.00 650o Donor/vol rec. $15,000.00 _ _ Totals $3ag,4oo.00 I;~S 9. ~e. o S e~~cw.~ ~ • (~. V~ , St~o P(~ West Vail Commercial Area Plan September 26th :Monday Goal: Identify issues from TOV staff and Community 10:00: Meeting with planning -Large Conference Room in Com Dev 11:00: Meeting with Public Works, PD, and Fire- Large Conference Room in Com Dev 1:00: Meeting with Finance Department-Large Conference Room in Com Dev 2:00: Meeting with Suzanne and Matt on West Vail Fire Station-Large Conference Rm. ** 5:15: Public Meeting in Holiday Inn September 27th Tuesday Goal: Ident~ use concepts, to meet the objectives of community and property owners. 8:00-8:30: Organizational Meeting: Review goals, products of the charette, and schedule.. What criteria should we judge our success? * 8:30: Presentation by Ian Thomas for Commercial property owners. 9:30: Input from commercial property owners 12:00: Lunch 1:00-2:00: Review Existing Conditions, Have a physical 2:00-6:00 Development of use alternatives (Include public improvements) image of site, what does zoning allow and not allow: Identify Specific Plan Objectives based on public, TOV and property owner input. September 28th Wednesday Goal.• Develop physical plan alternatives to achieve the objectives identified on Tuesday. 8:00-3:00 Create alternative development parameters 3:00-6:00 Development of options \ 6:00-Next Day: Model development parameter options i ,~ September 29th Thursday Goal: Refine concepts and report out to stakeholders. 8:00-11:00 Refine Options for Uses, design character, and Development Parameter 11:00-12:00 Update with Staff on presentation at 1:00 12:00: Working Lunch *** 1:30: Debrief on options with TOV and stakeholders. Review next steps DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA September 7, 2005 ~~ ~ 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC WELCOME PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Sherry Dorward Pete Dunning Lynne Fritzlen Joe Hanlon Margaret Rogers SITE VISITS 1. .Lupine Drive Duplex - 3877 Lupine Drive 2. Furseth Residence - 5142 Snowshoe Lane 3. Spruce Creek Townhomes - 1750 South Frontage Road West 4. Cascades on Gore Creek - 1390 Westhaven Drive/ Driver: Warren 12:OOpm 2:OOpm PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:OOpm 1. JEC Residence DR605-0302 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of new construction (landscape plan) 1386 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot G-2, Residences at Briar Patch Subdivision Applicant: Kemil Rizk, represented by Zehren & Associates ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 3-2-0 (Dorward &Fritzlen opposed) 2. Mountain Adventure Center DRB05-0416 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of a minor alteration (new door) 254 Bridge Street/Lot L, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Mountain Adventure Center, represented by Doug Sheehy ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 3. Vail Spa Condominiums DR605-0091 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 710 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Spa Condominiums Homeowners Association ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Fritzlen SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 5-0-0 Page 1 4. Cascades on Gore Creek DRB05-0433 Elisabeth/Warren Final review of change to approved plans (repaint) 1390 Westhaven Drive/Cascades on Gore Creek Applicant: Cascades on Gore Creek Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 5. Furseth Residence DRB05-0457 Bill Conceptual review of a separation request (new two-family residence) 5142 Snowshoe Lane/Lot 21, Vail Meadows Filing 1 Applicant: Dalis Furseth, represented by Brent Biggs Conceptual review, no vote 6. Spruce Creek Townhome Condominium Association DRB05-0449 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (siding, balcony and handrails) 1750 South Frontage Road West/Spruce Creek Townhomes Applicant: Spruce Creek Townhome Association, represented by TRD Architects ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. The applicant shall paint the stucco base KWAL's Sandcastle and the belly band on the ends of the building to match the hardi-plank siding, KWAL's Red Cedar. 7. Oberlohr Residence DR605-0366 Bill Conceptual review of new construction (single-family residence) 2179 St. Moritz Way/Lot 6, Vail Heights Filing 1 Applicant: Konrad and Monika Oberlohr, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 8. Lodge South Condominiums DRB05-0306 Bill Conceptual review of a residential addition (major exterior alterations) 200 Vail Road/Lot 2, Lodge Subdivision Applicant: Lodge South Condominium Association, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. The proposed mural shall be reviewed further with the applicant's future sign application. 9. Weyrauch Residence DR605-0367 ~ Bill Final review of new construction (primary/secondary residence) 2417 Garmisch Drive/Lot 14, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing 2 Applicant: Shawn Weyrauch, represented by John Martin, Architect, LLC ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 Page 2 10. Montauk Seafood Grill Deck DR605-0411 George Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 549 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 Applicant: Bob and Diane Lazier, represented by Tom Ludwig ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Hanlon VOTE: 5-0-0 11. Vail Dover Associates, LLC DRB05-0376 George Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping) One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Vail Dover Associates, LLC, represented by Resort Design Associates ACTION: Tabled to September 21, 2005 MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 12. Lupine Drive Duplex DRB05-0371 Final review of new construction (new duplex) 3877 Lupine Drive/Lot 6, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision Addition 1 Applicant: Rollie and Jeanne Kjesbo, represented by Kyle Webb ACTION: Approved MOTION: Hanlon SECOND: Fritzlen VOTE: 5-0-0 Staff Approvals Stephenson Residence DRB05-0370 Final review of a minor alteration (windows, sliding doors, hot tub) 1448 Vail Valley Drive, Unit A/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1 Applicant: Robert Stephenson, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Dooley Residence DR605-0364 Final review of a minor alteration (air conditioning unit) 174 East Gore Creek Drive., Unit 338/Lot A-C, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Tom and Barbara Dooley, represented by Beck Building Company Vail Dover Associates DRB05-0422 Final review of change to approved plans (service ramp) One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Bob McNichols, represented by Resort Design Associates Stevenson Residence DRB05-0360 Conceptual review of change to approved plans (exterior materials) 1518 Spring Hill Lane/Lot 15, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1 Applicant: Ray Stevenson, represented by Scott Turnipseed Town of Vail DRB05-0399 Final review of new construction (boulder retaining wall and public street) St. Moritz Way/Vail Heights Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Chad Salli Matt Bill Elisabeth George Elisabeth Bill Page 3 Town of Vail DRB05-0424 Final review of change to approved plans (sidewalk) 1280 North Frontage Road/Unplatted Applicant: Town of Vail George Christiania LTD DRB05-0425 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 356 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Christiania at Vail Condominiums, represented by Master Sealers Oldaker/Thedford Residence DR605-0378 Bill Final review of a residential addition (living room addition) 1476 Westhaven Drive, Unit 23/Lot 53, Glen Lyon Applicant: William Oldaker and Judith Thedford, represented by Miramonti Architect PC Schoeve Residence DRB05-0417 Matt Final review of a minor alteration (door and deck) 1620 Sunburst Drive, Unit 29/Vail Golfcourse Townhomes Applicant: Thomas & Karen Schoeve, represented by Eagle Design Construction Carbo Residence DR605-0436 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 4899 Meadow Drive/Lot 13, Block 5, Bighorn 5th Addition Applicant: Jorge Carbo, represented by Master Sealers Joe Villa Vallhalla DRB05-0437 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)384 East Gore Creek Drive/Lot K, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 5 . Applicant: Villa Vallhalla Homeowner's Association, represented by Master Sealers Ackerman Residence DRB05-0438 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 1550 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 21, Block 2, Dauphinais-Mosley Filing 1 Applicant: Joan Ackerman, represented by Plath Construction Schaetzel Residence DRB05-0401 Final review of a minor alteration (hot tub, landscaping) 2566 Arosa Drive/Lot 5, Block C, Vail das Schone Filing 1 Applicant: William and Barbara Schaetzel Matt Rojas Residence DRB05-0415 Matt Final review of change to approved plans (window) 400 East Meadow Drive, Unit 6/Lot 5D, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Enrique Rojas, represented by Michael Suman Architect, LLC Vail Corp. DRB05-0427 Elisabeth Final review of a sign (temporary site development) 675 Lionshead Place/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Corp., represented by Katie Viene Page 4 Lapin Residence DRB05-0428 Final review of a minor alteration (hot tub) 212 West Meadow Drive/Lot 6, Vail Village Filing 2 Applicant: Merv Lapin Bill Webb Residence DRB05-0430 Bill Final review of a minor alteration (window) 680 West Lionshead Place, Unit 407/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Toby Webb, represented by Alleman Construction, Inc. Trankina Residence DRB05-0431 Bill Final review of a minor alteration (windows, balcony door) 680 West Lionshead Place, Units 404 and 405'/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Mark and Susan Trankina, represented by Alleman Construction, Inc. Vickers Residence DRB05-0388 Elisabeth Final review of change to approved plans (landscaping) 3140 Booth Falls Court, Unit A/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: Ken and Becki Vickers Kendrick Residence DRB05-0426 Bill Final review of change to approved plans (pergola) 2975 Manns Ranch Road/Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Clinton and Mary Kendrick, represented by Beck Building Company Polidor Residence DR605-0441 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 4284 Columbine Drive, Units C and D/Lot 20-1, 20-2, Bighorn Subdivision a resubdivision of Lot 20 Applicant: Ruthanne Polidori Shannon Residence DRB05-0452 Bill Final review of change to approved plans (windows) 245 Forest Road/Lot 22, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Mike and Mary Sue Shannon, represented by Kyle Webb Sonnenalp DRB05-0429 ~ George Final review of change to approved plans (window grilles) 20 Vail Road/Lot 1, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Resort Design Associates Town of Vail DRB05-0442 George Final review of change to approved plans (planter) One Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2, Block 5E, Sonnenalp Subdivision Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer Kemp Residence DR605-0439 George Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 1379 Westhaven Drive/Lot 2, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Jack and JoAnn Kemp, represented by Fitz & Gaylord Landscaping, Inc Page 5 Moore Residence DRB05-0435 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (repaint) 2308 Garmisch Drive/Lot 15, Block G, Vail das Schone Filing 2 Applicant: John and Susan Moore Lamb Residence DR604-0260 Matt Final review of one year extension to original application 3130 Booth Falls Court/Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: Lamb Trust Ranallo Sign DR605-0459 Joe Final review of a sign 1701 F Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 6, Eleni Zneimer Subdivision Applicant: Pat Ranallo, represented by Mountain Construction & Management Co. LLC Town of Vail DR605-0465 .George Final review of a minor alteration (wildfire mitigation at Donovan Park) Donovan Park upper bench, unplatted Matterhorn Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Bill Carlson Cascade Village DRB05-0420 Matt Final review of a minor alteration (recreation path) Gore Valley Trail Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie Town of Vail DR605-0421 Matt Final review of a minor alteration (recreation path) Gore Valley Trail Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Gregg Barrie Town of Vail DRB05-0443 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 75 South Frontage Road/unplatted Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Yampah Builders, Inc. Canon/Vickers Residence DR605-0391 Elisabeth Final review of a minor alteration (repaint, shutters) 3140 Booth FaIIs Court, Units A and B/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: John Canon and Ken Vickers Dawson Residence DRB05-0466 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 891 Sandstone Circle/Lot 4, Block 3, Sandstone Circle Condominiums Applicant: Deborah Dawson Rickman Residence DR605-0448 Matt Final review of change to approved plans (entrance) 1495 Lion's Ridge Loop/Lot 2, Block 3, Lions Ridge Filing 2 Applicant: Patricia Rickman, represented by Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Page 6 Reimers Residence DRB05-0458 Warren Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 3090 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 8, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 11 Applicant: Arthur and Lindsey Reimers, represented by Fitz & Gaylord Landscaping Inc. Dantas Residence DR605-0447 Final review of change to approved plans (floor plan changes) 1788 Alpine Drive/Lot 12, Vail Village West Filing 1 Applicant: Dantas Builders, represented by Michael Pukas Rojas Residence DRB05-454 Final review of change to approved plans (chimney) 400 East Meadow Drive, Unit 6/Lot 5D, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Enrique Rojas, represented by Michael Suman Architect Landers Residence DRB05-0446 Final review of a minor alteration (exterior materials) 1454 Greenhill Court/Lot 1, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: John and Debra Landers Chapin Residence DR605-0461 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 2618 Larkspur Lane/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Intermountain Subdivision Applicant: David Chapin Landmark Lodge DRB05-0410 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 616 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Associates, represented by Jeffrey Babb Racquet Club Condominiums DRB05-0237 Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping) 4695 Vail Racquet Club Drive/Lot 1, Vail Racquet Club Condominiums Applicant: Racquet Club Owners Association, represented by John Russell Crack of Noon, LP DR605-0460 Change to approved plans (exterior lighting, floor plan changes) 1722 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 5, Block A, Lia Zneimer Subdivision Applicant: Crack of Noon, L.P., represented K.H. Webb Architects Vail Associates Inc. DRB05-0419 Final review of a minor alteration (public restroom) South of 458 Vail Valley Drive/Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7 Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc., represented by Jeffrey Babb McCarthy. Residence DRB05-0468 Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof) 1101 Vail View Drive/Lot 11 B, Casolar Vail Applicant: Brendan McCarthy Elisabeth Matt Warren Elisabeth Elisabeth Matt Elisabeth Warren Joe Page 7 Canon Residence DR605-0412 Elisabeth Final review of minor alteration (new deck, landscaping, retaining wall) 3140 Booth Falls Court, Unit B/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: John Canon Higgins Residence DRB05-0467 Joe Final review of a minor alteration (exterior changes) 14656 Greenhill Court/Lot 9, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Paul and Ursula Higgins, represented by Heid Construction Withdrawn Bogard Residence DRB05-0167. Elisabeth Conceptual review of new construction (single family residence) 1388 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot G2, Residences at Briar Patch Applicant: Thomas and Marina Bogard, represented by Zehren & Associates, Inc. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing impaired, for information. Page 8 _ . ».,.. ,., _ L.a,..__~ a.- GENERAL FUND ConMbatlama: .ti 2005 Cah Pfnal 7,005Io-Kind Floal Kind VahMte I~atl 2006 Cam ~~ 2006In•Khtd Request Kind Vahce Io-Kind Cash Io-Klnd Valve ECONOMIC: Bravo! Colorado/New York Philharmonic 6.30% 95,000 100,000 100,000 Bravo! Colorado Note #1 L00% 21,375 15 Ford Park Permits 1,350 25,000 IS Fold Park Permits 1,350 25,000 15 Ford Park Permits 1,350 Colorado Ski Museum Note #2 5.77% 20,000 0 Teva Mountain Games Note #3 9.40% 80,000 0 Teva In-Kind Note #3 PD,BleacheyTrash,e[c. 7,640 0 Vail Jars Foundation/I-Toward Stone Vail Jau Festival's Labor Da Weekend P S t. 1-4, 06 4.50% 6,650 l Blue Pass 825 15,000 1 Blue Pass 825 7,500 I Blue Pass 825 Vail Chamber&BusinessAssociation VCBA) 15.00% Colorado Snow Sports Expo Note #4 15,347 0 LionsHead Passport/Free Gondola Ride Program Note #4 233,075 0 Premier Impressions Note #4 9.67% 25,000 41,734 1 Blue Pass 825 0 Vail Gift Card 0 14,700 0 Vail Guido Note #4 9.67% 25,000 36,740 0 Vail Loves You Coupon Book 2.07% 5,355 8,345 0 Web Site 0 11,555 0 Vail.Farmers' Market 20.00% 5,000 Traffic, buses, si 2,250 Traffic, buses, si 8,000 Traffic, buses, si 8,000 Vail Vall Foundation Bids of Prey (Dec. 1-4, OS) 0.50% ADA & ubtic transit 10,000 ADA 8c ublic transit 14,000 ADA & ublic transit 14,000 The Session (Srrowboard hrvitational-Jan. 12-15, 06) 0.40% Parkin 2,500 Parkin 3,000 P 3,000 American Ski Classic (Mar. 22-26, 06) 0.20% Parkin 2,500 ParF~n 3,000 Parkin 3,000 Winter Concert Series/Street Beat Note #5 7.00% 16,571 PD & PW ort 6,000 28,500 PD & PW s rt 6,500 20,000 PD & PW s rt 6,500 Vail Intematioml Dance Festival O.10% 12,500 22,250 15,000 Gerald R. Ford hitheater of Summer Ni )Note #5 23.00% 20,000 PD resence 2,800 25,000 PD resence 2,800 25,000 PD reserrce 2,800 Vail Vall Chamber 8c Tourism Bureau 5.00% Vail Concierge Nights Program note 1 5,000 5,000 rove Local Econo Note #6 0 5,000 0 Events & Infornation Staff P 6 Blue Passes 4,950 Infomration Booths Note #7 170675 205,000 Lodging Occupancy Forecast Report Note #8 20.00% 10,000 0 Securo Commercial Arr Serv. to EGE Airport 10,000 10,000 (Admire Costs to manes e ro increased to 12% 1,200 1,200 TOV Communi Host Pro 27 Blue (Info B.) 22,275 7 Blue Passes 4,125 7 Blue asses 4,125 Commission on Special Events Note #9 100.[10% 594000 1 Rlue Pass R25 730.000 l Btue Pass R25 650,000 1 Blue Pass _ _ 825 7~f1'1'Ai;16'fiE#~tt1AiTCt ,,~- - - y .:.. ?~+ a;v _ ,. 11 , ~ 5fi ..75 L43 .44 ~I ; 0 ~- ' _ 52 ~ _- _ - - _ ~U s {,. 4 .4~. _ .__ _ __ _ Colorado Mountain Colle a H.E.R.O. Note #10 0.50°h 5,000 0 E le Vail Alliance for Sustairlabili Note #1 I 8.79% 15,000 Vehicle, Com Dr. lie. 5,200 ? Corn.) Use of staff/Vail 3,000 ? Freedom Park Memorial Committee 4.00% 100,000 . 0 Shaw Outreach Team Cancer House) 3.00% 15,000 0 Vail Leadetshi Institute America's Ris' Stars 64.00% 9,000 0 Vail S sium cash or Donovan e) Note #19 1,500 0 Vail Vall Exc a .Note #17 100.00% 6,000 0 Vail Valle Institute Note #12 L50% 2500 2,500 2,500 . .. _ _ _ -- _.. ~ __ _ ~ _._.. ~ _ ~ ~ ~ -+~, ~ Q .. _ (1 1* l' 2 3 4 St 6 7 8 9 10 11 17 13 14 14 14 14~ 14' 14' 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 38 34 26 Z005In-Ktod Plod Kind Vdae Final ~ ~ ~~ 2006Io-Kind Requeal I~ Vdne a In-Kind Cash In-Kind Value RFCe~:n~T aN , - ---- - - - - J - - BattleMountain Hi h School Ski Team Note #13 & #lS 5.00% Note 2 800 ce ns 2,500 800 ce ns 2,500 Yes 2,500 Battle Mountain Huskies Hock Booster Club Note #14 33.00°/ 79 lus. ice, 10,000 S Club of Veil Dec OS & Jul 12-16, 06) Note #IS 7.37% 9 da s of ice 11,891 9 da s of ice 11,891 Yes 11,891 Sld & Snowboard Club Vail Oct 26-29, 06) Note #lS 0.40% 4 da s of ice 5,285 4 da s of ice S,28S Yes S,28S Snowshoe Shui7lo-Sarah Ladd A ril 1, 06 6.00% P 4,000 . Parkin 4,000 Yes 4,000 S ia1O1 ics]en.8,1S,22,29,Feb.S,12,19,26,06 100.00% 70 co ns 1,120 80 ce ns 1,280 Yes 1,280 Vail Junior Hocke Association Note #1S & #16 9 da s of ice 11,891 9 da s of ice 11,891 Yes 11,891 VVMC Luncheon/Style Show (Apr. l2, 06) -- 3.00% -- 500-600 1 da arkinp~__ 4,000 500-600 1 day parking 4,000 Yes _ _ 4,000 fi(YTA~ _ T[Q.'~ -_ ~ Y C ~ -~ 0 t~ d0 687 _ 9 ~ ~q~ - 50~$a7 - _ 0 -- 0 _40 547 O~1TR3>SimC~B, ~ 781JB,'A'~T1XL'= ~ ~9'3 b26 ~.~ ? I ~ 2 -i rll.`~~7 x . ~s.7?_ - ,. Vail Vall Coven: TV/ChS 38% of franchise fee 33.00% 57,000 57,000 64,000 C ital rovement Note #18 8,200 8,200 Youth Reco 'don Award 7,000 7,000 7,000 Ea a Vall Child Care added l l/03) Note #20 8.00% 30,000 40,000 30,000 Vail Memorial Park Endowment Fund 50,000 0 Vail Va0ey Athlete Commission - - 4,750 4,750 rtxrer.= ~IACS> `mss ~. 'ttQTAY; (.esirital'Faad - - - ~e,~so -- -"- _ :-- - - J ~ * - _ - o~ - -- -7~ -i~ ----- r - o~ -- - - -0 a --- - ~ _ _ ~~ i h t„ Eagle Rivei Watershed/Caroline Bradt'ord Note #21 -100,000 100,000 100,000 River & Communi Pride H Clean U Be Ford AI ine Garden Foundation Note #I8 13.00% Note #22 50,000 50,000 50,000 Educational Interpretive Stations in the Main Garden 30,000 30,000 Pavers between the main Garden & Children's Garden 20,000 20,000 Pond ro-grade Bc construction 35,000 Plant Material 5,000 10% contingency __ - - 4,000 - - _ - ;TOTA1. _ T _,. __ ____ T_ _ ~ -- .. .: 7 _ .T. l~a,a,~~i 1----~ a _ _ __~ _. ~- 0 o .__ __ ~„~~r>~o 1 _ ~~ ~ ~_ _ .. __. 0 f _ -0 11._...7 2l'7~,C~(i0 ~l J 0 __ _T~ 0~ 0 27 28 29' 30 32 40