Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-03-07 Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionTOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 1:30 P.M, TUESDAY, MARCH 7, 2006 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and - cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update. (15 min.) 2. Todd Oppenheimer ITEMlTOPIC: East Meadow Drive Streetscape. (15 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve request by staff to negotiate construction contract for East Meadow Drive Streetscape Improvements scheduled for 2006 and 2007. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Department of Public Works~and Transportation has received preliminary pricing for the East Meadow Drive Streetscape Improvements from B&B Excavating Inc. and Weitz Construction. Preliminary pricing from both general contractors is favorable to the town and consistent with the construction estimates and project budget. Staff is requesting permission from the Council to complete negotiations with both general contractors to achieve the best possible price and schedule for the work. Staff will return to the Council on March 21, 2006, with a request to enter into a contract with the successful general contractor. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the recommendation to negotiate the final construction contract price for the East Meadow Drive Streetscape Improvements. 3. Tom Kassmel ITEM/TOPIC: Right of Way Street Cut and Use permit fees. (15 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL Provide policy direction to staff. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail has been spending significantly more time in regulating the Right of Way due to large construction projects and their requests for use of the Right of Way. The current fee .assessed is insignificant to the time spent on these requests and needs to be updated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review fee structure proposal and provide policy direction. 4. Leslie Fordham A, ITEMlTOPIC: Gore Creek Promenade Pedestrian Bridge Greg Barrie Replacement. (1.5 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: staff is requesting two items for approval at the evening meeting: Increase the Project budget to an amount to be determined in an addendum to this memorandum. 2. Authorize the Town Manager to enter into a contract with B & B Excavating, Inc. to construct the Gore Creek Promenade Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: In 2002, staff presented multiple options to .the Town. Council regarding the existing pedestrian bridge near the International Bridge. Options ranged from full replacement tofull removal. At the time, ~ the Council recommended replacing the bridge while reusing the existing abutments. In January 2006, staff was directed to proceed with the final design and bidding of the project. Proposals have been solicited from bridge contractors. Please see the attached Memo for additional information STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deperiding on the Proposals to be received on Friday, March 3, staff will recommend approving an appropriate budget and proceeding with the project. B. ITEM/TOPIC: Artwork for Gore Creek Promenade Pedestrian Bridge Replacement ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve AIPP expenditure for pedestrian bridge railing. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Town of Vail Public Works department is soliciting proposals to replace the pedestrian bridge at Gore Creek Promenade. If approved, construction will begin in spring, 2006. AIPP would like to enhance the appearance of the bridge by adding artwork to the bridge railings. This project was originally brought to the Town Council and approved in 2002; however, modifications have been made to keep within budget. A jury composed of Vail residents chose the artist. The current proposal combines eight art panels with traditional spindles. The panels depict Vail recreational activities and are made of layered perforated stainless steel. Art in Public Places voted unanimously to approve the artwork shown in the attached drawings. The board is working with the artist to finalize construction details. AIPP has approved spending up to $30,000 on the project. 5, ~ ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update. (10 min.) • Revenue Update. • Vail Land Use Plan. • Spring Clean Up. Last summer, the Town of Vail Council directed Vail Environmental Health to discontinue paying Town Clean Up' Day participants a $25 donation to their favorite local charity, which in most cases is a school sports team from one of the high schools outside of Vail. This year, the clean up day will be held on Friday, May 12, 2006, at the Vail Mountain School, giving those students the opportunity to participate in Vail's annual spring clean up. As directed by Council, the school and students will not receive a donation; however, the event will include a free barbecue lunch for all volunteers participating in the event. All the details of this year's clean up day event will be finalized in April, 2006. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or suggestions. g. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor & Council. (10 min.) 7. Matt Mire ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. § 24-6- 402(4)(a)(e) - to discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease transfer or sale of property interests and to determine positions, develop a strategy or instruct negotiators regarding the disposition of real property interests, RE: Timber Ridge Village (10 min.); 2) C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(a)(e) - to discuss the, purchase, acquisition, lease transfer or sale of property interests and to determine positions, develop a strategy or instruct negotiators regarding the disposition of real property interests, RE: real property acquisition (10 min.); 3) C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(b)(e) -conference with attorney to receive legal advice on specific legal questions and to determine positions, develop a strategy or instruct negotiators regarding the disposition of real property interests, RE: Developer Agreement for Crossroads Redevelopment. (1 hr. 20 min.) g. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment. (4:10 p.m.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT TBD, TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 2006 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 48-hour notification. Please call 479-2106 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING j~ February 27, 2006 Tt?IIrNOFVAI>; PROJECT ORIENTATION -Town Council Chambers -PUBLIC WELCOME 1:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT Bill Jewitt Doug Cahill Anne Gunion David Viele Chas Bernhardt MEMBERS ABSENT George Lamb Rollie Kjesbo Site Visits: 1.. Timberline Roost Lodge -1783 North Frontage Road Driver: George Public Hearing -Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm 1. A request for a final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a modification to shared property boundaries, Lots 4 and 7, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch Subdivision, located at 800 and 802 Potato Patch Drive., and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC06-0009) Applicant: Lloyd Ruth, Javier Velasquez, Peter Baffin, represented by Ann Bishop Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Approved MOTION: Jewitt SECOND: Viele VOTE: 5-0-0 Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. The applicant's representative, Ann Bishop, stated she had nothing to add to staff's presentation and memorandum. There was no public comment. The Commission stated that they were supportive of the request as it complied with all criteria. 2. A request for a final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapte Procedures, Vail Town Code, to Subdivision, located at 4242 East (PEC06-0011) Applicant: Kathryn Benysh Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved MOTION: Viele combine two lots into one, Lots 7 and 8, Bighorn Terrace Columbine Way, and setting forth details in regard thereto. r 13-12, Exemption Plat Review SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 5-0-0 Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum, he stated the application will result in greater conformity with the Town's regulations. Ms. Benysh, the applicant, gave a presentation supporting her case for the vacation of the subject property line. Page 1 Alan Packmeyer, a member of the HOA, gave a brief presentation related to several concerns about redevelopment projects being allowed to locate planter boxes within an access easement. He wanted it to be on the record that future additions and redevelopments within the development will need to be cognoscente of the access issues. The Commission was in support of the application. 3. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7J-12, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail ;Town Code, to allow for the construction of the Timberline Lodge, located at 178.3 North Frontage Road/Lots 9-12, Buffehr Creek Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC05-0080) Applicant: Timberline Roost Lodge, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC Planner: George Ruther ACTION: Tabled to March 13, 2006 MOTION: Viele SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0-0. George Ruther gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Dominic Mauriello, representing the applicant,. gave a presentation describing the project in detail. Howard Picking, a resident in Hillside condominiums. Concerned with notification process. Suggested that all property owners be notified with certified mailings not just the President of the H.O.A. Does not believe that the project is compatible with the neighborhood and that there are elements of this project being spot zoning. There is an interface problem between the PA-2 zoning and the zoning to the south. Caryn Carp, resident of Hillside Condominiums submitted photographs of the impact to her unit by the proposed structure. Photos were submitted into the record. Ann Bishop,. a resident of Vail, stated that this project is not .consistent with the Vail Comprehens+ve Plan or the neighborhood. Believes the system is broken. Deena Korklen, President of Buffer Creek West Condominiums, stated .she never received public notification. Mentioned that at a neighborhood meeting which included the developer the height was represented as not being as tall as it appears in the digital model.. Suggested multiple changes to try and bring the project into greater conformance with the neighborhood and the review criteria. Mark Levar, resident of Capstone Townhomes, concerned with the scale and bulk of the structure. Adele Picking, resident of Hillside condominiums, presented how her unit was directly impacted by the proposed structure. Mentioned that she had traveled quite extensively and has not seen any structure in any alpine village which looks like this proposed structure. Concerned that the structure does not respect the site and neighborhood. The project does not comply with criteria #2. Wendy Erb, resident of Hillside Condominiums, stated that it is reasonable to expect that the Roost Lodge was going to be redeveloped, but it is important to set a standard for the new Public Accommodation - 2 District. One of the tools in reviewing this project is compatibility with.the Page 2 neighborhood. This project is not compatible with the neighborhood. She referenced her letter she had submitted. Greg Bemis,r resident of Hillside Condominiums, believes the impact of this project is much greater than the site it is located upon. Concerned about visibility and the image it will convey about Vail. Although the project is within the zoning rules it does not make it right. The height methodology is confusing and misleading to the public, boards, and staff. What about the design guidelines. Diane Donovan, resident of Vail, discussed the height regulations of the Town of Vail and the history of the height regulations. Requested that the PEC ask staff to begin the process of bringing forth a clarification of the height regulations to make them more clear. Jim Lamont, .;.representing the Vaii Village Homeowner's Association, asked for clarification on the encroachments into the setbacks both above and below grade: Suggested moving the sidewalk as to eliminate the "splash factor" in order to allow for a landscape area between the North Frontage Road and the proposed sidewalk. Discussed the sun/shade analysis and its relationship to the impacts of view. The computer model was not interactive and it should be made to include more perspectives in order to more fully understand the impacts. Noise should not be touted as an improvement unless a study is provided. Concerned about the term of historic grade and its usage as it is not applicable to topic of measuring height. Feels it is more appropriate to deal with what grades are there today. Believes architects and planners are playing a game with the height regulations. Dominic Mauriello, representing the applicant, made some closing comments regarding compatibility ~of this proposed project and the surrounding properties. Discussed the zoning and the inherent knowledge that the, PA-2 zone district would allow for a larger building. Kevin Dieghan, applicant, discussed how they have done nothing with their structure which is different from how any other recent project has been measured. Bill Jewitt asked for several clarifications regarding the Public Works memorandum and PEC memorandum. Believes the applicant should participate in AIPP condition requirement. Believes that the new impact fee should be applied regardless of what point they are in 'the process. Copcerned with the apparent height of the structure. Believes.it was a feeble attempt at get an extra 30 feet in height. Suggested a physical model of the project and surrounding properties would be helpful. Does not believe the proposal fits the character of the neighborhood. Anne Gunion stated that the Code needs to be applied as it is adopted currently. Differentiated between the technical requirements and the more subjective criteria (design guidelines). Does not believe the applicant has used smoke and mirrors but has read the regulations. The regulations should include intent text to help boards understand what the purpose of height, etc. are when they were adopted. Concerned with how the ridge of the building appears long and continuous. Agrees the applicant needs to participate in the AIPP requirement, and increased traffic fee. Most concerned with Criterion 2 as the proposal does have a significant negative impact on surrounding properties. David Viele stated that he was reluctant to vote on the application as the reduced plans were only received prior to the meeting. Does not believe the developer has used smoke and mirrors. David asked a question regarding height as depicted on C-8 (Cross section). Believes the calculation of height needs to be resolved in terms of achieving the true intent. Page 3 Chas Bernhardt asked George Ruther to describe the notification process. It was clarified that notification was correctly performed. Chas. clarified the change to the PA zone district. Discussed the history of when properties where constructed and zoned which provides for expectation to redevelopment and size. Property owners are not necessarily entitled to the maximums of a zone district as they must also comply with criteria which address compatibility. Believes that this is the ugliest building -that has been proposed in his tenure in previous meetings hey was attempting to be tactful in his comments.' Disappointed the plans do not include sun/s'hade and that the plans were late. Although this parcel has different zoning it must be compatible with surrounding properties. Believes that the traffic impact fee should be that which is in place at the time of building permit issuance.. Doug Cahill asked that staff put an item on a future agenda to discuss public notification. Discussed how the intent of the height regulations are not met with the proposed structure: This project has a significant negative effect on neighboring structures in terms of bulk, mass, and height. Believes the applicant shall comply with AIPP requirements. 4. A request for a worksession to review the West Vail Redevelopment Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter VIII,'Section 3, Vail Land Use Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION:. Tabled to March 27, 2006 MOTION: Viele SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 5-0-0 Matt Gennett gave a presentation detailing the specifics of the draft Master Plan in its current, preliminary form. There were several questions regarding traffic circulation and the need for connections to Chamonix Road. Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, discussed the advantages of multiple. entrances and exits and the reduction in the need for an intersection traffic control, round-about, as the number of access points increased. Several individuals had concerns about the cut- through to Chamonix Road. There was great discussion regarding traffic circulation and what was trying to be accomplished. Regarding architecture Commissioner Gunion suggested that paint not be used to articulate the proposed structures vertically per one of the representative structures in the presentation: Greg Bemis, resident, suggested putting placards up for these types of projects like is done for the Town Picnics. Wendy Urr, residentconcerned about steep roads leading to Chamonix. 5. A request for a final review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for a resubdivision of Lot 4, Lion's Ridge Filing 2, to create lots 4A and 4B, located at 1401 Lion's Ridge Loop, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC06-0007) Applicant:. Richard and Jane Hart, represented by Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Planner: Matt Gennett ACTION: Tabled to March 27, 2006 MOTION: Viele SECOND: Jewitt .VOTE: 5-0-0 6. Approval of,l=ebruary 13, 2006 minutes MOTION: Viele SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 5-0-0' 7. Information Update Page 4 ;t 8. Adjournment` MOTION: Viele SECOND: Jewitt VOTE: 5-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. . Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published February 24, 2006, in the Vail Daily. Page 5 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA March 1, 2006 a ,~~~~. 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC WELCOME PROJECT ORIENTATION /LUNCH -Town Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT Joe Hanlon Pete Dunning Sherry Dorward Lynn Fritzlen MEMBERS ABSENT Margaret Rogers SITE VISITS 1. 9 Vail Road - 13 Vail Road 2. Vail Mountain View Townhomes -. 422 South Frontage Road West 3. Jasper Residence - 3245 Katsos Ranch Road 4. Heckmann Residence -1783 Shasta Place Driver: Elisabeth 12:OOpm 2:OOpm PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:OOpm Jasper Residence DRB05-0637 Matt Final review of a residential addition (garage, storage room, spa) 3245 Katsos Ranch Road, Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: Harry and Deborah Jasper ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Fritzlen • VOTE: 4-0-0 2. Maslak Residence DRB05-0542 Bill Final review of new construction (new single family residence) 1979 Sunburst Drive/Lot 12, Vail Valley Filing 3 Applicant: Samuel and Luceta Maslak, represented by Ned Gwathmey. ACTION: Approved MOTION: Fritzlen SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 4-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. Prior to application for a building. permit, the applicant shall submit a more detailed landscape plan to the Design Review Board for further review and approval. 3. Lion Square Lodge DR606-0042 Bill Conceptual review (major exterior alteration) 660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Subdivision Filing 1 Applicant: Lion Square Lodge, represented by Viele Development ACTION: Conceptual review; no vote . Page 1 4. Dantas Residence DR606-0040 Elisabeth Final review of change to approved plans (amended disturbance line) 1722 Alpine Drive/Lot 10, Vail Village West Filing 1 Applicant: Dantas Builders, represented by Dave Dantas ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Fritzlen SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 4-0-0 CONDITIOIN(S): 1. Prior to building permit issuance for Lot 11, the applicant shall have received approval of a revised landscape plan.that integrates increased landscaping in appropriate areas. on the site according to a civil engineered plan. 5. Dantas Builders DRB05-0616 Elisabeth. Final review of new construction (new single family residence) 1778 Alpine Drive/Lot 11, Vail Village West Filing 1 Applicant: Dantas Builders ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 4-0-0 CONDITION(S): . 1. The applicant shall provide utility verification signatures for Lot 11 at the time of Building Permit submittal. 2.. At the time of building permit submittal, the applicant shall provide professionally engineered stamped drawings of all walls proposed on the site plan which are over three feet in height. 3. At the time of building permit submittal, the applicant shall submit top-of-wall elevations for each wall located at the south side of the residence. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall have received approval of a revised landscape plan for Lots 10 - 12 by the Community Development Department. 6. Heckmann Residence DRB06-0026 ~ Elisabeth . Final review of new construction (new single family residence) 1783 Shasta Place/Lot 14, Vail Village West Filing 2 Applicant: Cflris Heckmann ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 3-1-0 (Fritzlen denied) CONDITION(S): 5. At the time of building permit submittal, the applicant shall provide a site plan for the public works department indicating the specific grading strategy at the east side of the residence. 6. At the time of building permit submittal, the applicant shall provide the Community Development Department with written documentation from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District indicating the permanent relocation of the well house and driveway from Lot 14. 7. Two dwelling units shall not be allowed on this property. 7. 9 Vail Road DRB06-0027 Elisabeth Final review of a residential addition (minor exterior alteration) 9 Vail Road/Lot B, Vail Valley Filing 2 Applicant: 9 Vail Road Condominium Association, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dorward VOTE: 3-0-1 (Fritzlen recused) Page 2 8. Vail Mountain View Residences DR606-0036 George Conceptual review of new construction (multi-family residences) 422 South Frontage Road West/Vail Village Filing 5 Applicant: Ron Byrne ACTION: Conceptual review; no vote Staff Approvals Vista Bahn Loft DR606-0031 Warren Final review of change to approved plans (screens for condenser units) 333 Bridge Street/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Rick Mueller, represented by W.E. O'Neil Construction Company Cloudman Residence DRB06-0022 Bill Final review of a;:residential addition (dormer) 5110 Grouse Lane/Lot 8, Unit A, Vail Meadows Filing 1 Applicant: Francis and Jenny Cloudman, represented by RKD Architect, Inc. Madero Residence DRB06-0030 Warren Final review of a residential addition (master bedroom) 1234 Westhaven Drive, Unit C52/Cascade Village Subdivision Applicant: Miguel Madero, represented by Architectural Services, PC Meadow Vail Place DR606-0032 Warren Final review of a;minor alteration (re-roof) 44 West Meadow Drive/Lot I, Vail Village Filing 2 Applicant: Meadow Vail Place Homeowner's Association, represented by Turner Morris, Inc. Gaughan Residence DR606-0039 Elisabeth Final review of change to approved plans (windows) 385 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 18, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Michael Gaughan, represented by Zehren and Associates The applications and information about the proposals are available for public. inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 youth Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Page 3 TC)WN OF V.~1L ' Memorandum To: Vail Town Council From: Gregg Barrie Department of Public Works Date: March 7, 2006 Re: Gore Creek Promenade Pedestrian Bridge Background At the January 17, 2006 Town Council Work Session, Staff was directed to proceed with final design and bidding for the replacement of the Gore Creek Promenade pedestrian bridge. The recommendation for. replacement was based on concerns that the existing bridge is underrated for the large crowds seen during special events. Using what is known about typical "twin-tee" construction, engineers estimate that the bridge can safely carry approximately 30 pounds per square foot, or approximately 50 people. Standard pedestrian bridge live loading criteria is 85 pounds per square foot. Therefore, it is likely that this bridge is significantly underrated. It is important to note that the existing bridge is in relatively good condition and in no danger of collapsing under typical daily .loads. Access to the bridge has typically been restricted during Special Events such.as the Duck Race and the.Teva Mountain Games in order to avoid overloading, however this continues to be difficult. In addition, if the improvements to the whitewater park move forward, the potential for overloading increases since the bridge is a prime viewing spot for spectators. Back in January of 2002, eight options were presented to the Town Council regarding the existing bridge. The options ranged from full replacement to full removal of the bridge. At the time, the Council recommended replacing the bridge while reusing the existing abutments and an engineering firm was hired to complete construction drawings for the project. Those drawings were finalized in mid-February, and a Proposal Package was distributed to interested contractors on February 17. The Proposal Process This coming spring, part of the Village Streetscape work is focused on the Gore Creek Promenade area. With this in mind, StafF looked at ways to utilize the on site contractors while still seeking competitive proposals for the bridge work. Therefore, the bridge replacement work was divided into two project scopes: the Site Work Scope and the Bridge Replacement Scope. The Site Work is similar in nature to the Village Streetscape work (excavation, stone veneer work, electrical work, and the snowmelt system), and pricing will be provided by B & B , Excavating, with most of the work being performed by the Streetscape subcontractors. For the Bridge Replacement work, Proposals have been solicited from several bridge contractors. Staff proposes that both Scopes should be performed as part of the Village Streetscape Phase II work, where the Bridge-Scope contractor will perform as a subcontractor on the existing contract with B & B Excavating, Inc. Project Cost In order to offer the contractors adequate time to provide thorough Proposals, the project cost will not be available until Friday afternoon (March 3). A summary will be emailed or faxed to Council Members at that time. Staff regrets that the costs were not available in time for this memo, however, due to .the lead time on the bridge structure, it was important not to delay the project for an additional two weeks until the next scheduled Council meeting. Scheduling. If the decision is made to move forward .with the project, construction will be coordinated with the Village Streetscape work on the Gore Creek Promenade. The start time will be dependant on the delivery of the steel bridge structure. Once started, it is estimated that the project should be completed in approximately three weeks. Pedestrian access will be provided to the Gore Creek Promenade shops and restaurants from both the Children's Fountain and Willow Road accesses. Budget The 2006 Budget currently includes $125,000 for the Bridge Replacement. However, the budget will likely require additional funds (to be determined by Friday afternoon, March 3) Action Requested by Council Staff is requesting two items: 1. Increase the Project budget to an amount to be determined iri an addendum to this memorandum. 2. Authorize the Town Manager to enter into a contract with B & B Excavating, Inc. to construct the Gore Creek Promenade Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project. Art Panels constructed of layers ~OPPer light txture to match Village Streetscape bollard fixture of perforated stainless steel. Color "Mocha" Stone pillar to match International Bridge ., Railing constructed of tubular steel w/ 1"~ square pickets. Color "Brevity Brown" Bridge structure and deck edging to match rail 2" x 3° Top Rail Gore Creek Promenade steel Angle Frame Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project Railing Design and Layout Artwork by: Lisa Fedon Layered Perforated Presented by: Art in Public Places Steel Art Panel February 2006 2 1/2" Square Post and Bottom Rail ' - Concrete Bridge Deck Bridge structure and deck edging color to match rail "Brevity Brown" Rail Section Scale 34" = 1' View from International Bridge Scale 1"= 5' Elevation B View from Upstream Scale 1"= 5' ~; ,, ~ Elevation B i ~T. ~~ ;~ - .;{;, _ _ '~, , _~~. k _, ~~ ~~ ~• . Elevation A ~"I~~. r,- n Plan View Scale: 1"= 2(