Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-09-04 Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 1:15 P.M., TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. Warren Campbell ITEMITOPIC: PEC/DRB Update. (15 min.) 2. John Power ITEM/TOPIC: Council Compensation,Discussion. (10 min.) 3. Dwight Henninger ITEM/7'OPIC: Last Call Program. (30 min.) Jill Hunsaker Jeff Layman BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Substance abuse was identified in a recent county health study as a priority concern by members of the community. In response, a new program. has been developed that addresses substance abuse through professional detoxification services, transportation, follow up, and case management. The Program is a collaborative effort of the local mental health, human services, medical, public health, recovering and policing communities and is modeled off a program currently operating in the Roaring Fork Valley. This Program takes the responsibility and liability of detoxification off local law enforcement as intoxicated persons will no longer be held in a jail cell. The Program seeks to utilize an already existing treatment structure (Colorado West Regional Mental Health Recovery Center in Glenwood Springs, Colorado) and to establish a new system in Eagle County to collect, transport, provide case management, enroll and otherwise support those with substance abuse addiction. The Program will be implemented as a pilot during fall 2007, with funds from Eagle County, but is seeking ongoing funding from the County, municipalities, emergency medical services and the hospital, in order to continue providing substance abuse services in the most appropriate setting. Colorado West Regional Mental Health Center will be the program coordinator and fiscal agent until a 501 c3 is established. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to presentation for consideration of inclusion in the Police Department budget for 2008. 4. Rachel Friede ITEM/TOPIC: Public Art in Private Development Guidelines. (15 Leslie Fordham min.) Matt Mire ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Art in Public Places and Community Development requests the Town Council review the Public Art in Private Development Guidelines, ask pertinent questions, and provide comments. The Town Attorney will identify significant issues for Town Council consideration and comment. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Public Art may be required in certain Town of Vail zone districts including Liorishead Mixed U~;e 1, Lionshead Mixed Use 2, Public Accommodations, Public Accommodations 2, Ski Base Recreation 2 and Special Development Districts (SDD). Six private developments within the Town of Vail currently have public art obligations. At present, there is not an approved administrative process or clearly defined criteria for the required public art. The Public Art in Private Development (PAIPD) Guidelines outline the administrative process and public art requirements for private developers too follow. 5. Kathleen Halloran ITEM/TOPIC: Review second draft of Town Manager's budget (General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, RETT Funds). (15 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review and discuss the second draft of the Town Manager's budget (General Fund). BACKGROUND RATIONALE: To be provided in separate memo. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To be provided in separate memo. 6. Rachel Friede ITEM/TOPIC: Discussion of First reading of Ordinance 27, Series of 2007, an ordinance amending Chapter 14-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, to provide definitions for terms of art, and to Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vaif Town Code, for proposed changes to the grading standards. (5 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 27, Series of 2007 on first reading. BACKGROUND: On August 27, 2007, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for the proposed text amendments identified in Ordinance No. 27, Series of 2007. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Community Development recommends that the Vail Town Council approve Ordinance No. 27, Series of 2007, on first reading. 7. Rachel Friede ITEM/TOPIC: Discussion of First reading of Ordinance 28, Series of 2007, an ordinance amending Chapter 12-21, Hazard Regulations, Vai( Town Code, in order to comply with FEMA floodplain regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Town Code, for clarifications to driveway and parking standards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (10 min.) ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2007 on first reading. BACKGROUND: On August 27; 2007, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously forwarded a recommendation of approval with modifications to the Vail Town Council for the proposed text amendments identified in Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2007. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Community Development recommends that the Vail Town Council approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of 2007, on first reading. 8• ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update. (10 min.) 9• ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor & Council. (10 min.) 10. Matt Mire ITEMROPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1.) C.R.S. § 24-6- 402(4)(a)(b)(e) - To discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of property interests; to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, regarding Town owned property. (45 min.) 11. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment. (4:00 p.m.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT TBD, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING ~. August 27, 2007 "TCl1VN(IFYt~It~~. 1:OOpm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS /PUBLIC WELCOME 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Michael Kurz Bill Pierce Anne Gunion Bill Jewitt Dick Cleveland Rollie Kjesbo David Viele Site Visits: None 10 minutes A request for a final review of an amended final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to amend a platted building envelope, located at 1463 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 8B, Block 2, Lions Ridge Filing 4, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0037) Applicant: Robert and Kristine Selby, represented by John G. Martin, Architect, LLC Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: 7-0-0 Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum There was no public comment. The Commissioners expressed support for the application. 20 minutes 2. A request for a work session to discuss the potential redevelopment of the Glen Lyon Office Building to allow for a mixed use development to include dwelling units, office, employee housing units, and subterranean parking, located at 1000 South Frontage Road West/Lot 54, Glen Lyon. Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0054) Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building ownership, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Nicole Peterson ACTION: No Action David Viele recused as he has an ownership interest in the property. Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Jen Wright, Owner/Applicant, made a presentation, outlining ownerships desire to explore possibilities for redevelopment of the property in line with, but separate from, the proposed plans Page 1 for Ever Vail. The goals of the project will be to retain the existing amount of office use square footage and to respect the scale of the surrounding area. Commissioner Jewitt asked Mr. Wright what he believed the public benefits would be of the proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade. Jen Wright stated that having the affordable housing on site, stream tract upgrades, replacement of the office on site, and improvements to the pedestrian circulation in conjunction with Ever Vail. Commissioner Cleveland asked if this redevelopment proposal was dependent upon the Ever Vail project. Mr. Wright responded that their plan was viable if Ever Vail does not proceed forward. Commissioner Kjesbo asked to what extent deviations to the existing zoning would be requested. Mr. Wright responded that they would be asking for minimal deviations as part of the amendrrient to the SDD. Mr. Campbell clarified that the proposal would likely be asking for deviations for setbacks for the underground parking. At this point in the process the plans were not developed enough to determine what other deviations might be needed. He concluded by stating that there was; no underlying zoning in place so deviations would likely be based upon the changes from the approved development plan that is in place. Commissioner Pierce stated that he liked the apparent low density of the project and the stepping down of the building masses as the project moved westward. Commissioner Cleveland stated that he would expect that all new employee housing requirements be met or exceeded on the site. He added that he was concerned about parking into stream and CDOT setbacks; should design/plan site to fit all improvements within site and required setbacks. Jim Lamont, representing the Vail Village Homeowners Association, stated his overall support of the project and suggested that this development be made part of the currently established Lionshead TIF district (for Lionshead Redevelopment). Commissioner Cleveland asked staff and the applicant to look into what the current deficit of parking (required) throughout SDD No. 4 was as it was his belief there was an existing deficit. Jay Peterson, representative of the applicant, stated that he believed that the parking deficit has been taken care of relative to previous development of Cascade Village. 15 minutes 3. A request for a final review of an exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12-7B-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for an exteriar renovation andl the remodel of the third floor residence, located at 201 Gore Creek Drive (Bell Tower Building)/Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0046) Applicant: Bell Tower Partners, Ltd., represented by VAG, Inc., Architects and Planners Planner: Scot Hunn ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 5-1-0 (Pierce opposed) Page 2 (Gunion recused) Conditions: 1. The Applicant shall be required to provide a building code and fire code analysis with any submittal for building permit. 2. The Applicant shall resolve all issues regarding drainage from the existing and proposed building on to adjacent properties; the provision of gutters, downspouts and other drainage methods may be required as revisions to building permit set of drawings with any building permit application. 3. The Applicant shall ensure that all new materials, sizes, textures, detailing and colors, blend or compliment those materials not being replaced and that any portions of the building in need of repair and/or replacement are included in the scope of this project in conjunction with any Design Review application. 4. The Applicant shall be required to submit a detailed and final lighting plan, showing all existing light fixtures to be removed, as well as all new fixture locations, fixture types and lumens/output; such plan should be accompanied by cut sheets for each proposed fixture. Commissioner Gunion recused as her architecture firm is working on the project. Scot Hunn gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Christie D'Agostino, the project architect, gave a presentation on the project. Jim Lamont asked if adjacent property owners had been notified and if any concerns were raised regarding the obstruction of views. Commissioner Cleveland asked staff to clarify how the building improvements comply with the height restrictions. Mr. Hunn stated that the Applicants and staff had used the most current methodology for calculating height; specifically that the Applicant was permitted to interpolate "existing grades" around the structure, and to measure proposed improvements based on existing or proposed grades (whichever is worse) around or within the structure. Commissioner Pierce suggested that the shed dormer proposed for the North facing roof plane be shifted to the West to help with the massing of the building; specifically, that the dormer not be engaged with the East fagade exterior wall plane. 30 minutes 4 A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Rucksack Building, located at 288 Bridge Street/Lot D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard, thereto. (PEC07-0039) Applicant: Jeffrey Selby, Charles Rosenquist and Richard Brown, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: Scot Hun ACTION: Approved with condition(s) MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0 (Pierce recused) Conditions: The Applicant shall resolve, to the satisfaction of the Town of Vail Chief Building Official and/or Fire Marshal, any and all issues related to egress from a public exit at the rear of the building prior to any submittal for building permit. Page 3 2. The Applicant shall be required to provide a building code and fire code analysis with any submittal for building permit, 3. The Applicant shall address any and all issues related to trash storage and access located on the North side of the Bridge Street Building (a.k.a. The Rucksack Building) in conjunction with any Design Review application. 4. The Applicant shall resolve all issues regarding drainage from the existing and proposed building on to adjacent properties; the provision of gutters, downspouts and other drainage methods may be required as revisions to building permit set of drawings with any building permit application. 5. The Applicant shall ensure that all new materials, sizes, textures, detailing .end colors blend or compliment those materials not being replaced and that .any portions of the building in need of repair and/or replacement are included in the scope of this project in conjunction with any Design Review application. 6. The Applicant shall submit a Design Review application for any and all riew exterior signage for the property; a sign program pursuant to Section 11 .B-2, Vail Town Code will be required. 7. The Applicant shall be required to submit a detailed and final lighting pllan, showing all existing light fixtures to be removed, as well as all new fixture locations, fixture types and lumens/output; such plan should be accompanied by cut sheets for each proposed fixture in conjunction with any Design Review application. Bill Pierce recused himself as his architecture firm is working on the project Scot Hunn gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. He highlighted the changes made to the proposal since the previous work session. He concluded by identifying several topics for discussion at the hearing. Jay Peterson mentioned that any application and review for a proposed bridge across Mill Creek would be presented at a later date, if necessary. Jim Lamont, representing the Vail Village Homeowners Association, brought up the need to "clean-up" the loading and delivery and trash for the Village as a whole and that this project would be the first to set the stage for these improvements. He then asked a question about circulation and improvements in the area known as Kindel Park. - He further added that access to this site should not occur from public property (Kindel Park). He concluded that showing the trash enclosure adjacent to Bridge Street was unacceptable and that it should be accessed from the Mill Creek side of the structure. He suggested an easement be obtained from the A ar~d D building; if not, the Town should use eminent domain in the public interest to obtain access to trash and loading and delivery for the Rucksack Building. Ross Davis, Jr., author of a letter dated August 27, 2007, for the Mill Creek Court .Building, summarized his letter of opposition to a loading and delivery (trash) on the Mill Creek side oi` the structure, as well as opposition to any proposed bridge over Mill Creek for use as private ac<;ess over public lands, and opposition to any building encroachments or disturbance caused by construction within the stream setback for Mill Creek. Commissioner Gunion suggested that the location of the trash and loading and delivery i:> an issue that needs to be addressed. There is a public benefit to relocating the trash enclosure. Dick Cleveland stated that he concurred, and that if the Building Code issues relative to access and egress cannot be met, the Applicant would need to revise plans and return for additional review by the Town. Page 4 The Commissioners generally. expressed support for the project's architectural elements, massing and height. Jim Lamont questioned permitted and conditional uses within the zone district, specifically whether this property could be converted in the future for use as dance clubs and bars on the second floor. Staff clarified the provisions of Title 12, Chapter 7, Article B, Commercial Core 1 district which would allow such permitted uses. 20 minutes 5. A request for a work session to discuss the potential redevelopment of Solar Vail to allow for a mixed use development to include employee housing units, office, and subterranean parking, located at 501 North Frontage Road West/Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0052) Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Johannes Faessler Planner: Scot Hunn ACTION: No Action Scot Hunn gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. Henry Pratt, of Gwathmey Pratt Shultz Lindall Architects, made a presentation, stating that the project will include all required parking for the office space, but will not include one parking space per employee housing unit. Additional parking could be available for a rental pool. Commissioner Jewitt asked if the Sonnenalp will run a bus for employees who don't wish to walk. Johannes Faessler explained that most Sonnenalp employees walk across the pedestrian bridge, or ride the bus. He said it would be easy to have a shuttle, but it is only a few minutes walk. Further, he explained that a majority of anticipated tenants would be employees of the hotel under the visa program; that such work visas are granted for limited durations (6-18 months) and that such employees would not normally own a vehicle under such circumstances. Commissioner Jewitt answered that there are different visions for parking in Vail. Jewitt said he would be in favor of reducing on-site parking. He said there the number of employees with cars is low, and he would like Johannes to provide an understanding of how many employees would require cars. Mr. Faessler explained that there are currently 6-8 cars parked at Solar Vail; there are currently 24 units. He said that the Sonnenalp could control the number of cars parked on the property, due to having other properties throughout town where additional cars could be parked. Additionally, Mr. Faessler assured the commission that the number of vehicles permitted per unit or tenant could be controlled through rental/lease agreements. Currently, the proposal includes 52 parking spaces for 63 units. Commissioner Jewitt applauded the proposal for having dormitory style housing. He said that he was concerned about the unbroken ridgeline. Commissioner Kjesbo suggested that Scot contact Middle Creek employee housing to help understand how their parking spaces have been utilized. Commissioner Cleveland said that the Sonnenalp has always been a leader in housing employees. He has concerns about bulk, mass and the east/west ridgeline, but he is generally in support of going into the housing zone district and evaluating the need for parking. Page 5 Mr. Faessler asked whether office could be utilized in this zone district. Staff responded that it is most likely a conditional use. Mr. Pratt responded that the office may not be used for office related to the employee housing. Scot responded that the office space is listed as an accessory use to the employee housing. He said that in order to have office space, such uses would have to be directly tied to (nexus) administration of the building operations and the employee housing program for the Sonnenalp. Mr. Faessler stated that not all office would be associated with the employee housing Commissioner Pierce asked what the intended use was for the office. Faessler said that there will be some Sonnenalp offices in Solar Vail, occupying about half of the office space available. He said that some of the remainder could be used for Sonnenalp in the future, but for now, the office space would be leased to another business. Commissioner Gunion said that there needs to be a zone district amendment to allow for office space not associated with the employee housing. Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowners Association, concurred with Commissioner Gunion that it is important to either adopt amendments to a new zone district, or go with some other route to achieve the intent of providing employee housing and appropriate ancillary uses within the Town. He suggested that Town and Applicant consult with Jeff Winston regarding the design of the building. Jim Lamont continued with comments on parking. He said that if the project has extra parking spaces, they could be used by or sold to other businesses in need of parking for their employees. He also said that there is a good bus stop nearby. He said that they need to have mass transit and have a bus stop on the property. Mr. Faessler asked about the Commission's input on development on slopes in excess of 4~0%. Henry Pratt clarified that the building design will step up the slope as much as possiblf~ to minimize the cut. Commissioner Viele urged caution relative to the proposed cut; specifically that the cut appeared to be large and that any large retaining wall system necessary should be located in the rear, adjacent to any parking or driveway areas, to minimize off-site impacts (visibility). 10 minutes 6. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for proposed text amendments to Chapter 14-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, to provide definitions for terms of art, and to Chapter 14-6, Grading Standards, Vail Town Code, for proposed changes to the grading standards, and setting forth details in reclard thereto. (PEC07-0041) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Recommendation of approval MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 7-0-0 Rachel Friede made a presentation regarding recent revisions to the text amendments. Commissioner Pierce requested clarification regarding language pertaining to maximum grade. He said the language seems to give too much discretion to the Administrator to allow for 1:1. Page 6 Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, assured the Commission that the Administrator was intended to mean staff, but that the DRB would review these types of projects as well. 15 minutes 7. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, for a prescribed regulation amendment to Chapter 12-21, Hazard Regulations, Vail Town Code, in order to comply with FEMA floodplain regulations, and Title 14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Town Code, for clarifications to driveway and parking standards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0053) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Recommendation of approval MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 7-0-0 Condition: 1. Staff shall strike Subsection 14-3-2G from the proposed amendments to the Vail Town Code. Rachel Friede made a presentation per staff's memorandum. Commissioner Viele asked who is the Town's Floodplain Administrator. Tom Kassmel, the Town Engineer, answered that this regulation would clarify that the Floodplain Administrator would be the Town Engineer or their designee. Commissioner Gunion asked if FEMA had reviewed the proposed regulations. Tom Kassmel responded that FEMA has read the ordinance and has given their approval via email. Commissioner Cleveland asked about the text amendment that would require owners to maintain curb cuts and pans. He was concerned about who would be responsible for repair if damage was caused by Town snow removal operations. He suggested revising language to allow some discretion by Town. Commissioner Kurz responded that staff needs to be careful about placing discretion within regulation, because it may turn into finger pointing and/or abuse in exercising discretion. Commissioner Cleveland suggested that maintenance should be the owner's responsibility if they undertook improvements within Town right-of-way. Commissioner Jewitt suggested striking the language for now, until staff can work out details. Rachel Friede agreed to strike Subsection 14-3-2G. Commissioner Kurz said to ensure that any language is legally defensible. Commissioner Cleveland then suggested that we address the percentage of compact cars allowed in a parking structure. Rachel Friede clarified that parking structures are allowed up to 25% of spaces to be compact. 20 minutes 8. A request fior a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, for proposed text amendments to Title 11, Sign Regulations, .and Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to regulations pertaining to outdoor display, sales signs, menu boards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0043) Page 7 Applicant: Town of Vail and Vail Chamber & Business Association Planner: Rachel Friede ACTION: Tabled to September 24, 2007 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 7-0-0 Commissioner Jewitt suggested that the staff presentation be skipped in order to accommodlate public comment. Steve Rosenthal, owner of Colorado Footwear, said he was speaking on behalf of the retail community. He had issues with the penalty section, specifically the provision to allow fees oi` up to $999 and 180 days in jail for each day of violation. He said that outdoor displays are integral and critical to the way Vail merchandisers conduct business and their specific need to liquidate merchandise. Regulations should recognize this aspect of business, as well as the difference between summer and winter merchandising seasons. Steve felt that the regulation as proposed does not provide for differential between stores with ample frontage, and those with no frontage. He said allowing only 12 square feet is too small for proper outdoor display. He suggested 1that any new regulations that affect existing businesses and their ability to liquidate be put on hold until all current construction is complete, possibly until 2011. Bob Walsh, Charlies T-Shirts, said that that existing signage is a not problem and has nE:ver received a complaint. He said that seasonality of retail business, coupled with year-round construction within the Village and Lionshead, is difficult and requires an allowance for signage. He said that the regulation as proposed is too complex and will be difficult for the business community and town staff to adhere to and administer. Tracy Hall, of Kidsports, opposes the continued and additional restrictions being placed on business owners. He said that new regulations will not help. Craig Arford, of Vail Bike/Ski Tech, reiterated previous comments. His shop has minimal frontage and he voiced concern about his ability to display signs and merchandise (bikes) around the corner from his shop. He suggested that the Town conduct a survey of guests to understand their preferences. Gigi Hoffman, of Laughing Monkey, said that the Town needs to take responsibility for impacts from construction and cranes, which have been driving away old customers and new visitors who "won't come back" due to construction. She said the Town is concentrating on future business and built environment, not current needs of existing business owners. She did not agree with or understand requirement for permitting of displays on Town owned space. Commissioner Jewitt voiced his disagreement with the permit requirements for outdoor displays. Michael Staughton, of Los Amigos and Russell's, disagreed with restriction on chalk boards. He also said that if the display box is in a location that doesn't allow for a chalk board to be installed below, then one should be allowed to place the chalk board or dry erase board elsewhere. He also did not understand why dry erase boards are restricted to black and why chalk boards are restricted to black or green. Rick Silverman asked for clarification regarding square footage regulations as applied.to tak>les. He questioned the ability of the Town to effectively enforce new regulations, if there are already issues relative to enforcement. He said the Town should do more to educate business owners regarding existing regulations, then should strive to amend and revise regulations based on more common understanding. Page 8 Stephen Connelly, of the VCBA, said he would not back the proposed regulations. He said that groups should work together to figure out what works best for the community. He said terms describing "administrator" should be studied to ensure that the correct staff or boards are entrusted with discretion. Ms. Friede informed the Commission and audience about a survey that was conducted at the start of the project to gauge support for new regulations, as well how the regulation should take shape. Commissioner Kurz said he understands the plight of business community. He felt, however, that the Town has a responsibility to implement policy. Further, displays reflect the quality of the business; a shoddy display reflects a business of the same caliber. Therefore, doing business in Vail requires regulation to ensure that image, community-wide, is protected and enhanced. He agreed that the Town must respect and foster individual business. owner's needs, but we still need regulations. Commissioner Pierce agreed with Commissioner Kurz. He supported staff's efforts and reminded business owriers that the project has been ongoing and reflects the input of several groups and individuals. The Town is responsible for ensuring a balance between regulations, fostering businesses and providing the desired experience for visitors/guests. Commissioner Gunion proposed that the regulation be "tested" within existing business community to see how existing business signage compares and how user-friendly the new regulations will be. She said the code will not fit all needs; but it needs to apply fairly to all businesses, and needs to preserve ability to be creative. Commissioner Cleveland mentioned that the issues regarding outdoor displays have come up several times, and that the issue is brought to light, periodically, based on complaints received by other businesses. The focus should be on guest experiences. And, in its current form, the regulations are not enforceable as it will take too much staff time. He did not feel that new regulation will effect any change. Commissioner Kjesbo supported staff's efforts to clarify the code. He did object to the amount of time it will take staff to administer. He did not agree that leasing Town owned land is appropriate in this situation. Commissioner Viele suggested that the Town's role, and the PEC's purview, is to regulate the guest's experience. He said that if the business community doesn't like the regulation, they should present a regulation that will work and be supported by the business community. Commissioner Jewitt agreed with Commissioner Cleveland that the fine is too steep, and that focus should be on the customer. Commissioner Cleveland made a motion to deny; however, the motion failed due to lack of second. 9. A request for a final approval of a preliminary plan for a major subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 1.3-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the creation of two new lots necessary for the redevelopment of the properties known as "Ever Vail" (West Lionshead), located at 862, 923, 934, 953, 1031 South Frontage Road West, and the South Frontage Road West right of way/Unplatted (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0020) Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Thomas Miller Page 9 Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION Tabled to September 10, 2007 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: 7-0-0 10. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to 12-3-7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning from Arterial Business District to Lionshead Mixed Use 2, located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage Road (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community Development Department), and setting forth Details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0021) Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Thomas Miller Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to September 10, 2007 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele ~ VOTE: 7-0-0 11. Approval of August 13, 2007 minutes MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 7-0-0 12. Information Update 13. Adjournment MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 7-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during recaular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published August 24, 2007, in the Vail Daily. Page 10 Please note: There are no DRB results since the last Council meeting on August 21, 2007. 2007 Elected Official Compensation Comparison Job #2705'- CITY COUNCIL l TR~1 T~FE Entity # Inc Pay Basis Salar y FR Updated Comments ALAMOSA 5 Annual $4,800.0 0 02/18/2007 ARVADA 5 Monthly $1,150.0 0 04/10/2007 ASPEN 4 Hourly $21.2 5 01/01/2006 Single coverage only for health/dental insurance. Stipend offered if health/dental covg. is waived. AURORA 9 Annual $12,199.0 0 02/12/2007 AVON 5 Annual $6,000.00 01/01/2006 BENNETT 5 Monthly $25.00 02/20/2007 BLANCA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 BOULDER 9 Annual $28,728.00 01/01/2006 BRECKENRIDGE 6 Annual $6,000.00 04/10/2007 BROOMFIELD 9 Annual $7,200.00 04/10/2007 Employee and employer pay share of FICA. Employee may contribute to 457. BRUSH 6 Monthly $200.00 04/10/2007 Our council members are called councilors. CALHAN 6 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 CAMPO 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 CANON CITY 6 Annual $3,600.00 02/09/2007 CARBONDALE 5 Monthly $600.00 01/01/2006 CASTLE ROCK 6 Annual $7,200.00 04/10/2007 CEDAREDGE 6 Annual $900.00 02/28/2007 CENTENNIAL 7 Monthly $700.00 04/10/2007 CENTRAL 4 Monthly $467.28 01/01/2006 Council does receive 2% cost of living each year. COLORADO SPRINGS 8 Annual $6,250.40 04/10/2007 City Council benefit rate sheets will be provided to the CML office. City Council members can participate in PERA, ICMA 457 or 401 a. The majority of our Council members participate in the 457 program. COMMERCE CITY 8 Annual $9,260.16 02/22/2007 Eligible to participate but pays 100% of premium for heath and dental CRAIG 6 Monthly $200.00 01/01/2006 CREEDE 422 Annual $1,450.00 01/01/2006 Three of our Trustees are paid 900 year and three are paid 2000. I just averaged the annual pay. CRESTED BUTTE 0 Annual $3,600.00 04/10/2007 CRIPPLE CREEK 3 Monthly $525.00 02/09/2007 EAP paid for by the City. 2 Council members are at $525 and 1 is at $500. DACONO 6 Monthly $50.00 02/14/2007 DELTA 3 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 Is alloted $50.00 wellness money toward. annual membership at recreation center or golf course. DENVER 12 Annual $78,173.00 X 02/21/2007 DILLON 6 Annual $3,600.00 01/01/2006 DOLORES DURANGO 5 4 Per Meeting Annual $25.00 $2,400.00 01!01!2006 02/12/2007 two trustees do not receive compensation and three trustees receive compensation. EATON 6 Annual $300.00 04/10/2007 ENGLEWOOD 5 Annual $7,200.00 04/10/2007 May participate in benefits, but pay full premiums ESTES PARK 6 Annual $1,800.00 02/20/2007 EVANS 5 Monthly $300.00 01/01/2006 FEDERAL HEIGHTS 5 Monthly $450.00 0 4/10/2007 FIRESTONE 5 Monthly $150.00 0 1/01/2006 FLORENCE 5 Monthly $75.00 0 4/10/2007 FORT COLLINS 6 Annual $7,560.00 0 2/17/2007 FORT LUPTON 6 Monthly $150.00 0 3/01/2007 P lus $25.00 per meeting/workshop or other meetings established for the Council to attend. Page 1 2007 Elected Official Compensation Comparison FORT MORGAN 5 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 FOUNTAIN 6 Per Meeting $25.00 03/01/2007 FOXFIELD 7 Monthly $100.00 02/27/2007 FREDERICK 5 Monthly $150.00 03/02/2007 FRISCO 0 Annual $3,000.00 02/26/2007 FRUITA 5 Monthly $250.00 04/10/2007 GEORGETOWN 0 Annual $0.00 02/21/2007 GILCREST 5 Per Meeting $25.00 01/01/2006 GLENDALE 5 Monthly $1,000.00 04/10/2007 GLENWOOD SPRINGS 6 Annual $6,000.00 02/14/2007 GOLDEN 7 Annual $12,000.00 02/19/2007 GRANADA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 No pay to council members GRAND JUNCTION 6 Hourly $542.00 02/14/2007 GRAND LAKE 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 GREELEY 6 Annual $9,600.00 04/10/2007 GREEN MOUNTAIN FALLS 5 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 GREENWOOD VILLAGE 8 Monthly $1,500.00 04/10/2007 Council members may participate in City's health and dental insurance at their own cost. City does not contribute to the premium. GUNNISON 3 Monthly $425.00 01/01/2006 GYPSUM 6 Monthly $300.00 04/10/2007 The Council voted for pay increases in March of 2004. Only those members elected in April of 2004 received the increase. Three members receive $50 per month and three receive $300 per month. HAXTUN 6 Annual $1,080.00 02/27/2007 HAYDEN 5 Annual $1,080.00 04/10/2007 HOLLY 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 HOTCHKISS 5 Monthly $50.00 01/01/2006 MUST ATTEND AT LEAST ONE MEETING PER MONTH IDAHO SPRINGS 0 Monthly $0.00 06/25/2007 JOHNSTOWN S Per Meeting $125.00 04/10/2007 KIOWA 1 Annual $1,200.00 03/02/2007 LAFAYETTE 5 Annual $4,800.00 04/10/2007 Wellness Program and Ecopass City matches up to 4% LAKE CITY 6 Annual $1,200.00 04/10/2007 LAKEWOOD 10 Annual $9,127.00 01/10/2007 LAMAR 6 Annual $1,200.00 04/10/2007 LAVETA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 LEADVILLE 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 LIMON 6 Monthly $45.00 03/01/2007 LITTLETON 4 Monthly $725.00 01/29/2007 LONGMONT 6 Monthly $1,000.00 02/27/2007 If Medical or Dental are elected, they must pay the full cost. LOUISVILLE 6 Monthly $250.00 04/10/2007 LOVELAND MANGOS 7 5 Monthly Monthly $600.00 $150.00 02/09/2007 02/27/2007 this rate is for new Council members AD&D Insurance only on the job MANITOU SPRINGS 6 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 unpaid elected position -covered by workmen's compensation MEEKER 5 Annual $649.00 04/10/2007 MONTE VISTA 3 Annual $2,738.00 02/27/2007 MONTROSE 3 Monthly $275.00 10/13/2006 MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 ELIGIBLE FOR A SEASON SKI PASS NEDERLAND 5 Arinual $0.00 04/10/2007 NEW CASTLE 6 Per Meeting $50.00 04/10/2007 NORTHGLENN 7 Annual $6,900.00 01/29/2007 OURAY 3 Monthly $100.00 09/08/2006 OVID 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 PALISADE 5 Annual $2,400.00 02/14/2007 Page 2 2007 Elected Official Compensation Comparison PALMER LAKE 5 Annual $0.00 11/14/2006 PARACHUTE 5 Monthly $60.00 04/10/2007 PARKER 6 Monthly $600.00 01/01/2006 PLATTEVILLE 5 Annual $900.00 04/10/2007 PONCHA SPRINGS 0 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 PUEBLO 6 Monthly $700.00 04/10/2007 RANGELY 5 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 RIDGWAY 5 Annual $1,200.00 01/01/2006 ROCKY FORD 6 Annual $40.00 04/10/2007 ROMEO 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 RYE 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 SAGUACHE 4 Annual $0.00 03/01/2007 SEIBERT 0 Annual $0.00 SILT 6 Per Meeting $100.00 02/27/2007 One trustee is Mayor Pro-Tem who is paid at Mayor's rate when chairing a meeting SILVERTHORNE 6 Annual $3,600.00 04/10/2007 Council pays 7.5%to 457; Town pay 7.5%. SILVERTON 5 Monthly $250.00 01/01/2006 Trustee salaries vary from a starting salary of $250 per month to a maximum salary of $377 per month after 15 years of service. STEAMBOAT SPRINGS 6 Monthly $600.00 04/10/2007 STERLING 5 Annual $3,600.00 02/14/2007 SUPERIOR 5 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 SWINK 5 Annual $900.00 01/01/2006 TELLURIDE 0 Annual $9,600.00 01/01(2006 THORNTON 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 TRINIDAD 5 Annual $3,600.00 01/01/2006 VAIL 6 Annual $6,000.00 01/01/2006 WALSENBURG 8 Per Meeting $75.00 04/10/2007 TWO OF CURRENT WERE APPOINTED BECAUSE NOT ENOUGH CANDIDATES TO FILL ALL POSITIONS RAN FOR OFFICE WESTCLIFFE 6 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 WESTMINSTER 5 Annual $9,600.00 02/23/2007 WHEAT RIDGE 8 Annual $7,200.00 02/16/2007 Life Insurance - $5000 WILLIAMSBURG 6 Per Meeting $20.00 04/10/2007 WINDSOR 6 Annual $2,100.00 02/20/2007 WINTER PARK 6 Per Meeting $200.00 01/01/2006 WOODLAND PARK 5 Annual $0.00 02/15/2007 YAMPA 6 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 YUMA 5 Monthly $200.00 04!10/2007 Jab #2700'= MAYOR= Entity # Inc Pay Basis Salary FR Updated Comments ALAMOSA 1 Annual $7,200.00 02/18/2007 ARVADA 1 Monthly $1,500.00 04/10/2007 ASPEN 1 Hourly $29.06 01/01/2006 Single coverage only for health/dental insurance. Stipend offered if health/dental covg. is waived. AURORA 1 Annual $52,615.00 02/12/2007 AVON 1 Annual $12,000.00 01/01/2006 457 is mandatory, Health insurance per month= $100 single, $200 family BENNETT 0 Monthly $50.00 02/20/2007 BLACK HAWK 1 Monthly $724.25 04/10/2007 BLANCA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 BRECKENRIDGE 1 Annual $9,600.00 04/10/2007 BROOMFIELD 1 Annual $9,600.00 04/10/2007 Employee and employer pay share of FICA. Employee can contribute to 457. BRUSH 1 Monthly $300.00 04/10/2007 CALHAN 1 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 CAMPO 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 Page 3 2007 Elected Official Compensation Comparison CANON CITY 1 Annual $5,400.00 02/09/2007 CARBONDALE 1 Monthly $1,000.00 01/01/2006 CASTLE ROCK 1 Annual $10,800.00 04/10/2007 CEDAREDGE 1 Annual $3,600.00 02/28/2007 CENTENNIAL 1 Monthly $850.00 04/10/2007 CENTRAL 1 Monthly $700.86 01/01/2006 Mayor does receive 2% cost of living e,~ch year. COLORADO SPRINGS 1 Annual $6,250.40 04/10/2007 City Council benefit rate sheets will be provided to the CML office. City Council members can participate in PERA, ICMA 457 or 401 si. The majority of our Council members participate in the 457 program. COMMERCE CITY 1 Annual $10,582.80 02/22/2007 Mayor pays 100% premium for health and dental CRAIG 1 Annual $300.00 01/01/2006 CREEDE 422 Annual $5,000.00 01/01/2006 CRESTED BUTTE 0 Annual $7,200.00 04/10/2007 CRIPPLE CREEK 1 Monthly $500.00 02/09/2007 EAP paid for by the City. DACONO 1 Monthly $75.00 02/14/2007 DELTA 1 Monthly $150.00 04/10/2007 Is alloted $50.00 wellness money toward annual membership for recreation center or golf course. DENVER 1 Annual $145,601.00 X 02/21/2007 DILLON 1 Annual $10,800.00 01/01/2006 DOLORES 1 Per Meeting $25.00 01/01/2006 pay is based on two meetings per month and paid per meeting attended . DURANGO 1 Annual $3,600.00 04/10/2007 EATON 1 Annual $420.00 04/10/2007 ELIZABETH 1 Monthly $250.00 01/01/2006 ENGLEWOOD 1 Annual $8,400.00 04/10/2007 May participate but pay full premiums ERIE 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 ESTES PARK 1 Annual $2,800.00 02/20/2007 EVANS 1 Monthly $425.00 01/01/2006 FEDERAL HEIGHTS 1 Monthly $600.00 04/10/2007 FIRESTONE 1 Monthly $200.00 01/01/2006 FLEMING 1 Monthly $50.00 01/01/2006 FLORENCE 1 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 FORT COLLINS 1 Annual $11,340.00 02/17/2007 FORT LUPTON 1 Monthly $200.00 03/01/2007 Plus $25.00 per meeting/workshop or other meetings established for the Council to attend. FORT MORGAN 1 Monthly $200.00 04/10/2007 FOUNTAIN 1 Per Meeting $25.00 03/01/2007 FOXFIELD 1 Monthly $100.00 02/27/2007 FREDERICK 1 Monthly $300.00 03/02/2007 FRISCO 0 Annual $7,800.00 02/26/2007 FRUITA 1 Monthly $400.00 02/08/2007 GEORGETOWN 0 Annual $0.00 02/21/2007 GILCREST 1 Per Meeting $37.50 01/01/2006 GLENDALE 1 Monthly $1,200.00 04/10/2007 GLENWOOD SPRINGS 1 Annual $8,400.00 04/10/2007 GOLDEN 1 Annual $6,000.00 04/10/2007 GRANADA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 No pay for the mayor GRAND JUNCTION 1 Monthly $750.00 02/14/2007 GRAND LAKE 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 GREELEY 1 Annual $14,400.00 04/10/2007 GREEN MOUNTAIN FALLS 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 GREENWOOD VILLAGE 1 Monthly $3,000.00 04/10/2007 Mayor may participate in City's health and dental insurance at their own expense. City does not contribute to the premium. GUNNISON 1 Monthly $525.00 01/01/2006 GYPSUM 1 Monthly $500.00 04/10/2007 HAXTUN 1 Annual $1,640.00 02/27/2007 Page 4 2007 Elected Official Compensation Comparison HAYDEN 1 Annual $1,440.0 0 04/10/2007 HOLLY 0 Annual $0.0 0 01/01/2006 HOTCHKISS 1 Monthly $200.0 0 01/01/2006 IDAHO SPRINGS 0 Monthly $0.0 0 06/25/2007 JOHNSTOWN 1 Per Meeting $200.0 0 04/10/2007 KERSEY 1 Per Meeting $100.0 0 01/01/2006 KIOWA 1 Annual $1,800.00 03/02/2007 LAFAYETTE 1 Annual $6,600.10 04/10/2007 Wellness Program, Ecopass City matches up to 4% LAKE CITY 1 Annual $1,800.00 04/10/2007 LAKEWOOD 1 Annual $24,000.00 01/10/2007 LAMAR 1 Annual $2,400.00 04/10/2007 LASALLE 1 Monthly $100.00 01/01/2006 LAVETA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 LEADVILLE 0 Monthly $400.00 01/01/2006 LIMON 1 Monthly $49.75 03/01/2007 LITTLETON 1 Monthly $1,150.00 01/29/2007 LONE TREE 1 Monthly $0.00 04/10/2007 LONGMONT 1 Monthly $1,500.00 02/27/2007 If Medical or Dental are elected, they must pay the full cost. LOUISVILLE 1 Monthly $500.00 04/10/2007 LOVELAND 1 Monthly $1,000.00 04/10/2007 They can participate in our 457, but the City does not contribute. MANGOS 1 Monthly $250.00 02/27/2007 AD&D Insurance only on the job. MANITOU SPRINGS 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 Unpaid elected position -covered by workmen's compensation MEEKER 1 Annual $909.00 04/10/2007 MONTE VISTA 1 Annual • $3,650.00 02/27/2007 MONTROSE 1 Monthly $325.00 02/27/2007 MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 NEDERLAND 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 NEW CASTLE 1 Per Meeting $100.00 04/10/2007 NORTHGLENN 1 Annual $9,660.00 01/29/2007 OURAY 1 Monthly $400.00 09/08/2006 OVID 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 PALISADE 1 Monthly $300.00 02/14/2007 PALMER LAKE 1 Annual $0.00 11/14/2006 PARACHUTE 1 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 PARKER 1 Monthly $750.00 01/01/2006 PLATTEVILLE 1 Annual $1,200.00 04/10/2007 PONCHA SPRINGS 0 Monthly $200.00 04/10/2007 RANGELY RIDGWAY 1 1 Monthly Annual $150.00 $1,500.00 04/10!2007 01/01/2006 ROCKY FORD 1 Annual $50.00 04/10/2007 ROMEO 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 RYE 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 SAGUACHE 1 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 SEIBERT 0 Annual $0.00 06/19/2007 SILT 1 Per Meeting $200.00 02/27/2007 Mayor Pro-Tem paid at Mayor's rate when chairing a meeting SILVERTHORNE 1 Annual $9,000.00 04/10/2007 Mayor pays 7.5% to 457; Town matches 7.5%. SILVERTON 1 Monthly $406.00 0 1!0112006 Mayor's salary varies from a starting salary of $300 per month to $455 per month. STERLING 1 Annual $6,000.00 0 2/14/2007 SUPERIOR 1 Monthly $400.00 0 4/10/2007 SWINK 1 Monthly $900.00 0 1/01/2006 TELLURIDE 0 Annual $18,000.00 0 1/01/2006 THORNTON 0 Annual $0.00 0 2/09/2007 TRINIDAD 1 Annual $4,800.00 0 1/01/2006 VAIL 1 Annual $12,000.00 0 1/01/2006 rage 5 2007 Elected Official Compensation Comparison WALSENBURG 1 Per Meeting $125.00 04/10/2007 WESTCLIFFE 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 WESTMINSTER 1 Annual $12,000.00 02/26/2007 WHEAT RIDGE 1 Annual $10,080.00 02/16/2007 Life Insurance - $5000 WILLIAMSBURG 1 Per Meeting $50.00 04/10/2007 WINDSOR 1 Annual $3,000.00 02/20/2007 WINTER PARK 1 Per Meeting $400.00 01/01/2006 WOODLAND PARK 1 Annual $0.00 02/15/2007 YAMPA 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 YUMA 1 Monthly $300.00 04/10/2007 ~ ~ aOb #2701 -' MAYOR PRO TEM` Entity # Inc Pay Basis Salary FR Updated Comments ALAMOSA 1 Annual $4,800.00 02/18/2007 ARVADA 1 Monthly $1,250.00 04/10/2007 AURORA 1 Annual $13,951.00 02/12/2007 AVON 1 Annual $9,000.00 01/01/2006 457 mandatory, Health insurance moni:hly= $100 single, $200 family. BENNETT 1 Annual $25.00 02/20/2007 BROOMFIELD 1 Annual $7,200.00 04/10/2007 Employee and employer pay share of f=1CA. Employee may contribute to 457. CAMPO 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 CANON CITY 1 Annual $3,600.00 02/09/2007 CARBONDALE 1 Monthly $600.00 01/01/2006 CENTENNIAL 1 Monthly $750.00 04/10/2007 CREEDE 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 CRIPPLE CREEK 1 Monthly $500.00 02/09/2007 EAP paid for by the City. Acts as Mayor Pro Tem and Councilman. DELTA 1 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 DOLORES 1 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 ELIZABETH 1 Per Meeting $25.00 01/01/2006 ENGLEWOOD 1 Annual $7,800.00 04/10/2007 May participate in benefits, but pay full premiums ERIE 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 EVANS 1 Monthly $300.00 01/01/2006 FEDERAL HEIGHTS 1 Monthly $500.00 04/10/2007 FIRESTONE 1 Monthly $150.00 01/01/2006 FLORENCE 1 Monthly $75.00 04/10/2007 FREDERICK 1 Monthly $150.00 03/02/2007 FRISCO 0 Annual $3,000.00 02/26/2007 FRUITA 1 Monthly $300.00 04/10/2007 GEORGETOWN 0 Annual $0.00 02/21/2007 GILCREST 1 Per Meeting $25.00 01/01/2006 GLENDALE 1 Monthly $1,000.00 04/10/2007 ' GRANADA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 no pay for mayor pro-tem GRAND LAKE 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 GREEN MOUNTAIN FALLS 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 GUNNISON 1 Monthly $425.00 01/01/2006 HAYDEN 1 Annual $1,200.00 04/10/2007 HOLLY 0 Annual $0.00 Oi/01/2006 HOTCHKISS 1 Monthly $50.00 01/01/2006 MUST ATTEND AT LEAST ONE MEETING PER MONTH Mayor Pro Tem apponited by Board of Trustees JOHNSTOWN 1 Per Meeting $125.00 04/10/2007 KERSEY 1 Per Meeting $50.00 01/01/2006 KIOWA 1 Annual $1,200.00 03/02/2007 LAFAYETTE 1 Annual $5,099.90 04/10/2007 Wellness Program, EcoPass City matches up to 4% Page 6 2007 Elected Official Compensation Comparison LASALLE 1 Monthly $50.00 01/01/2006 LAVETA 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 LEADVILLE 0 Monthly $0.00 01/01/2006 LITTLETON 1 Monthly $900.00 01/29/2007 LOUISVILLE 1 Monthly $250.00 04/10/2007 LOVELAND 1 Monthly $800.00 02/09/2007 MANGOS 1 Monthly $150.00 02/27/2007 AD&D Insurance only on the job. MEEKER 1 Annual $649.00 04/10/2007 MONTE VISTA 1 Annual $2,738.00 02/27/2007 MONTROSE 1 Monthly $275.00 10!13(2006 MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 NEDERLAND 1 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 NORTHGLENN 1 Annual $7,935.00 01/29/2007 OURAY 1 Monthly $100.00 09!08/2006 OVID 0 Annual $0.00 01/01/2006 PALISADE 1 Annual $2,400.00 02/14/2007 PALMER LAKE 1 Annual $0.00 11/14/2006 PARACHUTE 1 Monthly $60.00 04/10/2007 PARKER 0 Monthly $600.00 01/01/2006 No extra pay for Mayor Pro Tem -- same pay as Council Member PLATTEVILLE 1 Annual $900.00 04/10/2007 PONCHA SPRINGS 0 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 RANGELY 1 Annual $100.00 04/10/2007 RIDGWAY 1 Annual $1,200.00 01/01/2006 SAGUACHE 1 Annual $0.00 03/01/2007 SEIBERT 0 Annual $0.00 SILVERTON 1 Monthly $250.00 01/01/2006 Mayor Pro Tem receives the same salary as other Trustees. Salary range varies from a starting salary of $250 per month to $377 per month. STERLING 1 Annual $4,800.00 02/14/2007 SUPERIOR 1 Monthly $100.00 04/10/2007 SWINK 1 Annual $900.00 01/01/2006 THORNTON 0 Annual $0.00 04/10/2007 TRINIDAD 1 Annual $3,600.00 01/01/2006 WALSENBURG 0 Per Meeting $100.00 04/10/2007 WESTMINSTER 1 Annual $10,800.00 0212312007 WOODLAND PARK 1 Annual $0.00 02/15/2007 YUMA 1 Monthly $200.00 04/10/2007 Page 7 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS GUIDELINES September 5, 2007 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an outline of the process and requirements for public art for development projects within the Town of Vail. 2. APPLICABILITY: The following guidelines shall apply to all projects in the following zone districts in order to determine public art requirements: a. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 (LMU-1) District, per subarticle 12-7H-18, Vail Town Code b. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 (LMU-2) District, per subarticle 12-71-18, Vail Town Code c. Public Accommodations (PA) District, per subarticle 12-7A-14, Vail Town Code d. Public Accommodations 2 (PA-2) District, per subarticle 12-7J-14, Vail Town Code e. Ski Base Recreation 2 (SBR2) District, per subarticle 12-8E-17, Vail Town Code f. Special Development (SDD) District, per Article 12-9A, Vail Town Code 3. EXCLUSIONS: These guidelines do not apply to publicly-funded public art projects on public property. Publicly-funded public art projects on public property shall be regulated by the Art in Public Places Policies and Guidelines. 4. DEFINITIONS: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES BOARD (AIPPB): The Art in Public Places Board, established in 1992, pursuant to Chapter 3-3, Vail Town Code. ARTISTS BUDGET: Any cost associated with the creation of the public art including materials, fabrication, artist fee and installation costs. DEVELOPMENT: The construction, improvement, alteration, installation, erection, or expansion of any building, structure or other improvement within the Town. LIMITED EDITION: A limited edition shall be defined as one of no more that nine copies produced from an original artists mold. PROJECT COORDINATOR: A person who acts as a coordinator for the public art project. This and may be a person from the development team's in-house staff, the project's landscape architecture firm, the project's architecture firm, or a .private art consultant. PUBLIC ART: Any original creation of visual art that is visible and accessible to the public. 5. DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT: The following criteria and findings shall be used by the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and/or the Town Council when evaluating projects in the applicable zone districts in order to determine if there is a public art requirement: a. Criteria: Upon review of a development in the applicable zone districts, the Planning and Environmental Commission and/or the Vail Town Council shall use the following criteria to determine whether a project shall be required to provide public art in order to mitigate development impacts: i. the extent to which including public art can mitigate the bulk and mass of the project; ii. the extent to which public art can enhance the overall quality of the project and give it a unique character, not achievable in other ways; iii. the extent to which public art will enhance community character and lifestyle; iv. the extent to which public art will make the public areas of the site more visually appealing; and v. the extent to which public art can be used to create a landmark and/or identity for the project, serving to further the Town's way-finding system and assisting residents and guests to navigate the built environment. b. Necessary Findings: The PEC or Town Council shall require public art if they have determined that the criteria above necessitates public art for the project. Should the PEC and/or Town Council determine that public art is required, the public art shall follow the review process and requirements of these guidelines. 6. PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENTS: a. LOCATION: Public art shall be installed on-site in a location that is open to the public and is visible from a pedestrian or vehicular way. Projects that do not have available on- site options may be required to build public art on adjacent public property, as determined by the Art in Public Places Board. Final approval of location shall be determined by the Design Review Board. Locations include but are not limited to: i. Community hubs or gathering places ii. Portals, entrances or gateways iii. Adjacent to sidewalks, adjoining parks and plazas iv. Integrated into the floors, walls and ceilings within the public areas of the project v. High traffic areas or areas along the bus route. b. BUDGET: The following outlines eligible costs for public art that shall be provided for within the established budget: i. Artist's budget shall be no less than 80% of the public art budget. ii. Artist solicitation costs, including call for entries, printing, mailing, artist proposal and design fee, or other costs as determined by the Art in Public Places Board, shall not exceed 10% of the public art budget. iii. Project coordinator fees shall not exceed 10% of the public art budget. c. PROFESSIONAL ARTIST: The public art project shall be designed by an artist that meets at least three of the following criteria. Emerging artists who demonstrate a high level of competence, ability to create unique artistic enhancements, understanding of mediums and relationship of artwork to the site may be acceptable at the discretion of the Art in Public Places Board. i. Artist has obtained a Bachelor of Fine Art and/or Master of Fine Art from an accredited college or university. ii. Artist has exhibition experience in a professional context (i.e. galleries, museum, art centers, or other exhibit venues). iii. Artist has received peer recognition such as honorable mentions, awards, prizes, scholarships, appointments, and/or grants. iv. Artist is pursuing his/her work as a means of livelihood and/or a way to achieve the highest level of professional recognition. v. The artist's work has been discussed in a published writing. vi. The artist's artwork is/has been held in public or private collections. d. ARTIST SELECTION PROCESS: The artist may be selected through the following processes: i. Open Competition: The project is advertised and all interested artists may submit preliminary ideas in narrative form along with examples of previous work. 2 A small number of finalists may be selected to submit detailed designs and/or models for the project. ii. Limited Competition: A selected number of artists are invited to submit proposals. iii. Invitation: One artist is invited to submit a proposal. e. ELIGIBLE PUBLIC ART: The following; when produced in limited edition, shall be considered eligible as public art: i. Attached or site-integrated art elements such as passageways, bridges, street furniture, paving materials or artistic features within a garden; ii. Mosaics, painted murals, or terrazzo covering walls, floors and passageways; iii. Independent orfree-standing sculpture; iv. Interdisciplinary artwork including the written word, glass, photography, sound, video or any other multi-media works of art considered appropriate for the site; v. Earthworks or the integration of natural and man made materials in the landscape; vi. Fountains and water features; and vii. Any other project deemed eligible by the AIPPB. f. INELIGIBLE PUBLIC ART: The following shall not be eligible as public art: i. Reproductions or unlimited editions of original work; ii. Mass-produced items; iii. Works that are decorative, ornamental or functional elements of the architecture or landscape design, except when commissioned by a professional artist; iv. Directional elements such as super-graphics, signage, or graphic elements already part of the project; v. .Designs that are created by the project architect, graphic designer or landscape architecture firm; and vi. Business logo or signage. 7. PUBLIC ART REVIEW: Upon requirement of public art by the PEC and/or Town Council, the following process shall be required: a. Preliminary AIPPB Meeting: Within 45 days of PEC and/or Town Council determination of public art requirement, the applicant shall meet with the AIPPB for a preliminary meeting. The applicant shall submit a request in writing for a preliminary meeting to the AIPP Coordinator at least fourteen (14) days before a scheduled AIPPB meeting in order to be placed on the meeting agenda. The applicant and AIPPB shall consider potential themes, location, artist selection method and project schedule. The AIPPB shall make recommendations to the applicant, and shall determine a deadline for submittal of the public art plan. The AIPPB may make a determination on the project at the preliminary meeting. ' b. Design Review Board: The applicant shall gain approval of the site plan, including the location of public art, by the Design Review Board. The Design Review Board shall have final approval of location of the public art. Any changes to the location of public art shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board. c. Final AIPPB Meeting: The applicant shall submit a public art plan to the AIPP Administrator on or before the deadline set by the AIPPB at the preliminary meeting, and at least fourteen (14) days before a scheduled AIPPB meeting. The AIPPB shall review the public art plan and make a determination of approval, approval with modifications, or denial,. within forty (40) days of submittal. The AIPPB shall also determine an amount required for a letter of credit should the public art not be completed by the determined completion date. i. Public Art Plan: The public art plan shall include: (a) Location of public art on a site plan. (b) Artist resume. (c) Itemized list of expenses. (d) Installation schedule. (e) Representations of the artwork. Artwork may be represented by submitting samples of artwork that are substantially similar to the finished piece. ii. Criteria for Review of Public Art Plan: The AIPPB shall utilize the following criteria when reviewing public artwork: (a) Compatibility with the site: Works of art should strive to be contextual to the site and relate to geographical, cultural or historic aspects of the community. Artwork shall be compatible in style, scale, material, form, and content with their surroundings, and should form an overall relationship with the site. (b) Public Safety: Artwork shall not create safety problems or liability problems for the general public or the Town of Vail. (c) Permanence: Artworks that require expensive and/or continual maintenance acre discouraged. Works of art shall be resistant to theft; vandalism, and weathering. (d) Enduring design: Artwork shall. be viewed as a long-term acquisition that should have relevance aesthetically to the community in future years. Artwork should be selected that reflects enduring artistic quality. (e) Quality and Innovation: The artwork shall show inherent artistic excellence and innovation. (f) Engage the Public: The artwork shall engage the public through an imaginative concept. (g) Artist Credentials: The artist shall meet the criteria outlined in these guidelines. (h) Budget: The budget shall adhere to the standards for budget in these guidelines. (i) Schedule: The artwork shall be installed within a maximum of one year of the building completion. iii. Necessary Findings: Before granting an approval, the AIPPB shall find that the public art plan meets the above listed criteria of these guidelines. 8. PUBLIC ART COMPLETION AND REQUIREMENT OF LETTER OF CREDIT: The public art project shall be completed prior to completion date set by the AIPPB in the approved public art plan. Completion of the public art plan shall be determined by the AIPP Administrator upon inspection. If the AIPP administrator determines that the public art is not complete by the completion date, the applicant shall be required to provide a letter of credit of an amount determined by the AIPPB at the Final AIPPB meeting to the AIPP Administrator to ensure that the public art is completed and complies with the approved plan. The letter of credit will be released upon completion of the public art, as determined by the AIPP Administrator upon inspection. 9. MAINTENANCE: Maintenance of the public art shall be the sole responsibility of the owner of the project. The AIPP Administrator may determine maintenance is required and shall provide notice to the owner requiring maintenance within thirty (30) days. 10. APPEALS: Appeals of AIPPB decisions shall utilize the same process outlined in Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, for the appeals of PEC decisions. 11. VIOLATIONS: Violations of these guidelines shall be subject to penalties in Section 1-4-1, General Penalty, Vail Town Code. 4 i • • • • • • • • • • • • ~~~~,~.GtDS IFV°"~~~';1, ~~=l~i~~~SSG~~~~°.~~J~~ IC)~^,..='`~f~~s~I~~~..~s~~~ PUBLIC ART COMPONENT -RATIONALE AND ESTIMATED BUDGET ARGENT STUDIOS August 31,2007 ~~1~~®~~~~~®~ In my public art projects I am attempting to somewhat reduce the hierarchical nature of what is assumed to be art. So much of what audiences gather as the definition of art, particularly contemporary art, is a fear of not knowing what "it" is supposed to be. My philosophy is to break down these barriers. I do this not by placating to the generic but perhaps confronting this generic and reinventing a presence that can illuminate and stimulate. wish to foster an interest that permits the viewer to interact on a multitude of levels and perhaps questions the ingrained notions of his/her assumed, obtained belief systems. Conceptual Approach Let me begin by framing my thoughts around an article I recently read discussing Public Art. "The primary problem with most public art, both contemporary and historical, is invisibility. The wide and diverse "general public"-however that set of people maybe defined or construed -does not notice the works of art that now crowd American cities. Unless the artworks provide some sort of amenity (a bench, a fountain, or signage), most people walk right by them, oblivious to their presence. And who can blame them? Too much public art is intentionally abstruse, misdirected to a minutely narrow audience of critics and cognoscenti. Or, the work is just plain poorly designed and executed. Or, as with historical examples, the statue has moldered on the village green for so long that it melds with the scenery, taking it's place as perceptual and cognitive background rather than foreground. From Sculpture Magazine Nol. 20 No.7)"Brainstorms" Whilst I don't necessarily swallow all of this, there is something that remains at the core that is worth investigating. The experience of art. What is it that we want people to experience? It's all relatively subjective. We all have different ideas and opinions about what it is that art should do. That's what is so exciting about finding a common element that swims in both the deep and shallow ends of the art experience. Table of Contents SHEET 1. ..Introduction & Conceptual Approach SHEET 2 . .Symbolic Meanings and Background SHEET 3.. . Geyser- Sculptural Element SHEET 4 . . Droplet -Sculptural Element SHEET 5.. . Pool of Light -Sculptural Element SHEET 6.. .. Winter View- Droplet and Geyser Sculptures SHEET 7. ...Plaza with Water Feature -Summer SHEET 8....Plaza with Geyser and Glass Benches SHEET 9...Views of East Sitle of Plaza SHEET 10...Plaza Plan -Summer View SHEET 11...Plaza Plan -Winter View SHEET 12... Plaza Details pppp SHEET 13...Materials SHEET 14....Budget ARGENT STUDIOS 3014 Wyandot St. Denver, CO 80211 3034336263 VOICE 303 5610585 FAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Introduction AUGUST 31, 2007 ©LAWRENCE ARGENT 2087 ARGENT STUDIOS 3014 Wyandot St. Denver, CO 80211 3034338263 VOICE 303 5610585 FAX "In nature we find patterns, designs and structures from the most minuscule particles, to expressions of life discernible by human eyes, to the greater cosmos. These inevitably follow geometrical archetypes, which reveal to us the nature of each form and its vibrational resonances. They are also symbolic of the underlying metaphysical prinaple of the inseparable relationship of the part to the whole. It is this principle of oneness, underlying all geometry that permeates the architecture of all form in its myriad diversity. This principle of interconnectedness, inseparability, and union provides us with a continuous reminder of our relationship to the whole, a blueprint for the mind to the sacred foundation of all things created ". (The Geometry Code, Bruce Rawles) Public Plaza The plaza must function as an entryway, a place for seasonal programming, a town center, and a sanctuary for its own unique experience. Given this broad set of parameters, I felt it was important to provide an underlying sense of organization grounded in natural theory. These principals of interconnectivity allow us to meld pragmatic needs, or the functionality of the plaza, with an underlying Sacred Geometry. Sacred Geometry is the blueprint of Creation and the genesis of all form. It is an ancient science that explores and explains the energy patterns that create and unify all things and reveals the precise way the energy of Creation organizes itself. Every scale, every natural pattern of growth or movement, conforms inevitably to one or more geometric shapes, The molecules of our DNA, the cornea of our eye, snow flakes, pine cones, flower petals, diamond crystals, the branching of trees, a nautilus shell, the star we spin around, the galaxy we spiral within, the air we breathe, and all life forms as we know them, emerge out of timeless geometric codes. The ancients believed that the experience of Sacred Geometry was essential to the education of the soul. They knew that these patterns and codes were symbolic of our own inner realm and the subtle structure of awareness. To them the "sacred" had particular significance involving consciousness and the mystery of awareness. One of the most profound and significant activities encompassed within sacred geometry is the 'Golden Mean Spiral', derived by using the 'Golden Ratio' (The Golden Ratio, Phi, The Divine Section, The Gallen Section, The Golden Cut, The Golden Proportion, The Divine Proportion, these all mean the same). This can be illustrated by a numerical series found frequently in the natural world, which is known as the Fibonacci Series - formulated by an Italian mathematician, Leonardo Fibonacci (1170-1250). This formula is the basis for the layout of the plaza, the paving pattern and how both the ice rink and pop jets relate to the site. `l 4 ~~ `. -~ ~ , ~ E ~~ ..- s ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ego , ~ ~~' I~1 < h Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ABT COMPONENT Symbolic Meanings AUGUST 31, 2007 ©IAWAENCE AAGENT 1001 Sheet number - 2 ARGENTSTUDIOS Sculptural Elements The Geyser \a `\ This piece began with the importance of water. Water is liquid gold. It is vital to life, and the connective el- ement that joins us all. In particular, water is an integral and necessary resource for the Town of Vail. With that in mind, utilizing computer software, 1 created an upward flaw of water, appearing to burst from the ground. Freezing this image at a particular moment, I was able to capture the existing structure to be con- structed out of bronze, This geyser of sorts provides the basis or framework for the crystallized water forma- tions to ding to. These "bubbles" will be fabricated from a translucent fiber reinforced polymer with a frosted surface. They will be individually lit with LED's and computerized controls, Over time a subtle color change will take place. For example - it may be that one enters the plaza at 2.OOpm and the light bubbles (all of them) will be aqua blue. Upon their exit Zhrs later, they may find the color to be at the early stages of a spring green. Theblackgranitebasewillfunctionasanintegratetlseatingelementthatflowsintooftherestoftheplaza.Threecastsolid glassblocksarepartofthisseatingarrangementgivingtheillusionofice,emphasizingthetransitionalnatureoftheground planeinallseasons Theglassblockswillbecasttoemulatethestonesurface-honedontopandfracturedonthesides. -~ ~~ 3014 Wyandot St. Denver, CO 80211 303 433 8263 VOICE 303 561 0585 FAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Geyser -Sculptural Elements AUGUST 31, 2007 ©LAWRENCE ARGENT 2W7 21'-2 3/4" Sheet number- 3 G ~~ ; ~- ~ ~ 1 ARGENT STUDIOS 3014 Wyandat St. Oenuer, CO 80211 303 433 8263 VOICE 303 561 0585 FAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Bronze Droplet with Gold Plated Top - SculpturalElements 14.45 ft. 24.70 ft. ~~ 28.89 ft. AUGUST 31, 2007 ©LAWAENCE ARGENT 2e0] The Droplet Once again, drawing inspiration from water and the powerful properties it beholds, I tried to de- pict the flow of water from the heavens above by creating a single droplet. From the suggested gold- en source, the droplet begins to form and is captured as it appears to have fallen from the sky The drop- let is made of cast bronze with a burnished patina and agold-plated spire. The sculpture is situated on a black granite base, elevating the piece and creating an inviting seating niche. Protected within the body of the droplet is a fire element. This fire element will enliven the plaza with a warm glow of flickering flames, X47 ft. . ~ ~. L Sheet number- 4 - - ~~~_ r i ~ ~ I ~ ARGENT STUDIOS 3014 Wyandot St. Denver, CO 80211 3034338263 VOICE 303 5610585 FAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Winter View of Droplet and Geyser Sculptures AUGUST 31, 2007 ©LAWRENCE ARGENT 2G07 f i ~- , .. ~ _ i ~~, ~ Y ~ ~~ ~~. Sheet number- 6 ARGENTSTUDIDS 3014 Wyandat St. Denver, CO 80211 3034338263 VOICE 303 581 D586 FAK Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Plaza with Water Feature -Summer AUGUST 31, 2007 ..r~ ~ ~ _, ~~ a ~_ .. ,F .~«'.F . k.. £ ~~. ©LAWRENCE AAGENT 2007 Sheet ruimher 1 • • • • t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t • • • • • ARGENTSTUDIOS ~°'~- ~~ ~ I~ 3014 Wyandot St. Denier, CO 80211 3034336263 VOICE ~ ~ ~ - 303 6610586 FAR ~1" I __ ~ Solaris Project, ~ Crossroads %/ Redevelopment ~~ ~,, PUBLIC ART COMPONENT i J , '~" '~ ~ Plaza with Geyser j _ Sculpture and Glass fi ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Benches ~ ~.. ~ - . ~ ~ i ^! .. ~ ' Ail. ~~~_rTi.~ ±° , I ,~:_iM1t~~ ~ ` _ I i .Wr~ ~..3 _ . ~~~ ~;~ AUGUST 31, 2007 ©LAWAENCE ARGENT 2007 Sheet numller 8 AROENT STUDIOS 3014 Wyandot St. Denver, CO 80211 3034336263 VOICE 303561 D586 FAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Views of East Side of Plaza AUGUST 31, 2007 '••"-~ is `.. •. 7~. '7 - ~~;1 t r;~ - 4~. a~ ,- - r r _.. r~ ~~ i ~ ~ ` ~;'~' ,~' ~ t: 7 ~ ' `~ xY t ~- .w ; , .~ ©LAWRENCE ARGENT 2007 Sheet number- 9 ARGENT STUDIOS 3014 Wyandot St. Denuer, CD 80211 303 433 8263 VOICE 303 5610585 FAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Plaza Plan Summer 0 WATER JET FOUNTAINS WITH UPLIGHTS AND MISTERS O PUBLIC ART SCULPTURE BY ARGENT STUDIOS O PUBLIC ART SCULPTURE 8Y ARGENT STUDIOS O PLANTER AT PLAZA EDGE: O INSETFLUSHGRADE 5 STONE PAVERS CREATE 'THRESHOLD' AT PLAZA EDGE AUGUST 31, 2001 ©LAWRENCE ARGENT 2007 Y 0 ~_ ~OT 1 f 1 f (9r~T'L..~.: '' O FOG EMMITTERS IN ELLIPSE -HELP REDUCE HEAT 7o STONE BLOCK TERRACE AND ARCHITECTURAL WALL PLAZA ENLARGEMENT -SUMMER STAIRS UP TO PROMENADE LEVEL Note: This plan represents final proposed site and landscape d esign. SOLARIS PLAZA PLAN -SUMMER ARGENT STUDIOS TOWN OFVAIL i . ~ RN ES LAWRENCE ARGENTARTIST DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ~ ~ 0 10' 20' 40' 60' qUG 2, 2007 • ~Archit u Y DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 't 3 Sheet number-10 3014 Wyandot St, Denuer, CD 80211 3034338263 VOICE 303 561 0585 FAX ~f ARGENTSTUDIDS Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPDNENT Plaza Plan -Winter ~..~__ - I ' ~~. c_ ~ ` ~ i ~ r • ~R ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ O 1~ ISLAND ~,~~` AUGUST 31, 2007 1 I ! ~ OAT RINK WITH ~"~ ,~ y ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ILLUMINATED CENTER _ D ~~ O 0 - ~ ~ r '~. -~ '/ O PUBLICARTSCULPTUREBY __ $ i ~ - ~' , ARGENT STUDIOS I' ~ (t I 5 3 PUBLIC ART SCULPTURE AND po ~ o _ ~ ~ O 0 , i ~ O FIRE PIT BY a y' t ~/ ., (~{~ ARGENT STUDIOS --« ~,, ('~~~OV O 3 4O PLANTERATPLAZA EDGE, },t { ~ 4 `~ I , ^ 0 ~(` Q ~oo 0o O O RUBBER MAT -,- I E,{ U n ~ ` FOR SKATERS ©LAWAENCEAACENT2W7 Q Oq,.,.~ OBI ~ v- _ ~ ~ ~ -~„~~~ -•' RI~~ AT FIRE PIT ==a _,~ - ~ td Q ~O~J 6 PLAZA PAVING - ~^-_'~.._~~- ~ w~ ~/ S4 M O WITH SNOW MELT --- _ O~ 1 ' V - 1 SYSTEM / ~ OTERRACEOND r ~__~,~~ _ _ _ ~,vr-, `? ~ i ~" -` G_ ARCHITECTURAL WALL 1 . ~+J.:1 ~~ ~ Architects SOLARIS ARGENT STUDIOS TOWN OFVAIL LAWRENCEARGENTARTIST DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Note: This plan represents final proposed site and landscape design. PLAZA PLAN -WINTER D' 10' 20' 40' 60' AUG 2, 2007 4 Sheet number -11 art L"L`Zi ~q _ ''''N''2~s %1~ - - - ,' ' ' 111~- '°'a ~ ~aa~ . ~ r ~ 3~ 4 , A r ' , J L ~- 1 nl N~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~' ~-. Cy 'a ~` FoJ I J l j ,! N ]LT ~ =H ~ V~L. f~ i 'J iA t O.,`6 \ f ~~ KEY PLAN WATER FEATUREAT POCKET PARK srAxpsrpre eLaNwnN rrxlcNPRAREBROwr HONEDroPAND FASEO TOP EOGE9 OPANItEPAVER9 BT Dq-BPRINGGRWIIF BO1H 91pE5C~ OVMONDJET IW FlNISX SEEPUN FDR ASXLM MTIEPN UYWiAfD ~ DIMENSIONS OF DIw0VA1 ~~~ tyHpywFPF RUSXGNLE OIGAHOIM JOIMSIM 9AVOSIONE PAVER WRHTElaV1 FlNISH RE'. PLANB PORLOGATIONB AWMINUM 6UBFPNE Wx81NUCfED DFI%ELEB SEOIIREOTO %PZ\pURINGWIXiFA OPEIUipN E BEE DETALSMESHEEi FORDOxxFCPONS -~ ]NUAINVN SNIIR / ~ iOE qCN PlNI AW PE: PACH FOR SUBB45E a+sT~nuPE rMAxsANp rcusse ROnD sETnNG SED. BASE RE SPECS TYPICAL STONE RLOCKANDPAVER DETAIL LLn uaR SauRCE aulLrlxro STANlE8681EEL WJVO RAIL i}~DxrxoulL, MPGDBUaxO FINISHroLUTCHHANDRAIL9 AT PROAE W llE. PANELS TO SE 6-0' MAN. BOLiEO FNDiO ENO POLVCARBONAIF COVER PECE95EO LEDFIBFAOPRC SRBP f PoLxiuRnlc PANEL }'FR081EDLD4N ILLUMINATION smmroPROreDTLED LBVs 1 TMUGNGpLTCOxNEC1E0 TO ADIACENi H4lIRNLPM'EL i ~A~ANGIE IRONS l JHOacroxam mxpulrs, CONNECT TO ELEC.FORIE09, 90UNDPNDCROUNDING t'SrFELPUTE, ANCHOR BOLTED i0 CON[AER BASE MROUGH PAYER 1rBi0NE MYER l rMORTAR BED BF10W PAVER TwNnDEnexcxoxs~v ~/~ CWNRERBUNNAT FWSH GMDEOF 0 0 PAVER, CPPPEO PoRSUMNER avERlnprva PLAU .. . /1TOE KICKANDAND RAILATICE RINKEDGE IN WINTER n SECTION AT FIRE PIT AND DROPLET SCULPTURE B ¢hit is RN ES Y~~{rl:ah<<I{: r[analaNaswnARJ WNECDDG, RE W,y M:pl ARGENT STUDIOS LAWRENCE ARGENT ARTIST SOLARIS TOWN OF VAIL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW 80ARD Note: This plan represents final proposed site and landscape design. PLAZA DETAILS AUG 2, 2007 5 AAGENTSTUDIOS 3014 Wyandot St. Denver, CO 80211 3034336263 VOICE 303 5610585 fAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT PIa2a Details AUGUST 31, 2007 ©IAWRENCE ARGENT 2001 n SECTION AT POCKET PARK SECTION AT ICE RINK ISLAND IN WINTER ti i 1 , # ~ i ~ r `°~~ ~ ~ ~, B ~ ~ ~- F l~ ..~ F B f~ E D ~ . ~'~ ~'' y Ja ,- ~~ A ~ -. ~, ~~ ;a _. ^ y '4~... BUILDING MATERIALS CONCEPT: ~~~ LS -~ ~. ~' ~~ >> ~- y \~ A ~~- D i'"" GOB ~µtVE ~St M~' ~~~ v /~~ THE INTENT IS TO USE RICH MATERIALS THAT COMPLIMENT THE REFINED MATERIALS USED ON THE BUILDING. THE SAME SANDSTONE THAT IS USED AT THE BASE OF THE BUILDING WILL BE USED IN BOTH LARGE BENCH SLABS AND AS FLUSH GRADE -INSET PAVERS. THE SCULPTURES ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PLAN WITH THE MATERIALS AND THE LAYOUT. GLASS BLOCKS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED AT THE BASE OF THE LIGHT TREE AS SEATING. THE PAVING PATTERN ISA RANDOM ANGLED ASHLAR PATTERN CREATING A'FIELD'AFFECT-THAT SLIGHTLY DISSAPPEARS. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS ~ A' -: /~ tf o ~.. A OKLAHOMA SANDSTONE BLOCKS AT PLANTER TO BE SAME SANDSTONE MATERIAL AS ON FACADE OF BUILDING. D GRAY GRANITE BENCHES. HONED FINISH ON TOP WILL BE SMOOTH AND ROUGH CUT SIDES may: ~ y1t , • . . `~ ~ ~+~ .:~ 'CHAMPAGNE C MIST'GRANITE FOR BANDS AND FIREPIT E ANTIQUE SEMI TRANSPARENT GLASS CUBES AT BASE OF LIGHT TREE. G VERTICAL WATER JETS AND UPLIGHTS WILLADD DRAMA AND SPECTACLE TO THE PLAZA IN THE SUMMER MONTHS. FOGGERS AND MISTERS DURING SUMMER MONTHS WILL LOWER TEMPERATURE AND ADD INTEREST. -, F PLANTERS k.v4 ~s:.'7°. '~~.tu, ' ~~.{ . `~~.;~. $~r ~ . ;'~~, F GRADUATED! HAMMERED FINISH OF GRANITE AT BASE OF SCULPTURES ~~ , ~ . ~' ~ rchit I is i~ ~RYNES ARGENT STUDIOS LAWRENCE ARGENTARTIST SOLARIS TOWN OF VAIL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Note: This plan represents final proposed site and landscape design. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AUG 2, 2007 6 ARGENT STUDIOS 3014 Wyandot St, Denver, CO 80211 3034338263 VOICE 303 5610585 FAX Solaris Project, Crossroads Redevelopment PUBLIC ART COMPONENT Landscape Materials AUGUST 31, 2001 Sheet number-13 FOUNTAIN IN A CAN COMPONENT WITH UPLIGHTAND MISTER. B PRAIRIE BROWN GRANITE PLAZA PAVER AND AT PROMENADE LEVEL COMPLIMENTS BUILDING MATERIALS. BUILDING MATERIALS MOCKUP WITH OKLAHOMA SANDSTONE BLOCKS. ~ ~u~~~a~ ~u~LaL ~~ ~ ~~u~~~aovo a budget ARGENT STUDIOS • GEYSER Bronze structure fabrication $ 200,000 3014WyandotSt. Denver, CO BD211 . 3034338263 VOICE Composite bubble fabrication $ 413,000 3035610585 FAX • . Black granite base fabrication $ 50,000 Solaris Project, Benches around Geyser (10 dark gray granite benches 20"h x 18"w x 30"L. Total length 25') $ 25,000 Crossroads Fabrication of glass benches (3 glass benches 20"h x 18"w x 18"Leach) $ 66,000 Redevelopment • Lighting fabrication /units and controllers $ 75,000 PUBLIC ART Shipping and Installation of all light tree components $ 34,000 COMPONENT Geyser Subtotal: $ 863,000 i Budget • DROPLET Bronze structure fabrication $ 110,000 • • Gold plating on top of droplet $ 27,750 Fabrication of black granite base $ 35,000 • • Shipping and Installation of all droplet components $ 8,000 Droplet Subtotal: $180,750 AUGUST 31, 2007 • CENTER ICE COVER Fabrication of composite cover in transportable sections $ 150,000 Shipping Allowance $ 4,500 Ice Cover Subtotal: $154,500 Artwork Fabrication Subtotal: $1,198,250 ©IAWRENCEAAGENT200T ARGENT STUDIOS Artist's fee for design, fabrication supervision, installation coordination, administration, & expenses. $ 200,000 SUPPORT SERVICES (10% Allowance per Town of Vail Developer Guidelines) Suman Architects -Client representative and architectural liason • Barnes Coy -Architect Davis Partnership -Landscape and public plaza design i Flack and Kurtz -Electrical and engineering consultants • Structural Consultants Incorporated -Engineering for sculptures Automated Fire and Water Effects -gas systems and engineering Subtotal for Additional Services: $110,000 ~ TOTAL SOLARIS PUBLIC ART CONTRIBUTION: $1,508,250 ~ Please note :there has been no allowance for the fire, extra