HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-11-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION AGENDA
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, CO 81657
12:30 P.M., TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2007
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and
cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council
will consider an item.
1. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: Site Visit: (1) Alpine Drive Construction (2)
Children's Garden of Learning. (1 hr.)
2. Warren Campbell ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update. (15 min.)
3• ITEM/TOPIC: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between
the Town of Vail and the Vail Recreation District. (5 min.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Discuss and/or ask
questions of staff concerning the proposed MOU which will be
presented for your approval tonight.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Recreation Task Force,
consisting of: VRD board members Michelle Hall and Joe Hanlon;
Town Councilmen Mark Gordon and Greg Moffett and members of
staff from both organizations have been working over the last two
years to cooperatively address issues related to town-owned,
VRD-managed facilities. The Memorandum of Understanding
presented tonight memorializes the agreements and intentions of
the parties. It provides a basis for future deliberations and
negotiation of leases. The MOU has been executed by the VRD.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Memorandum of
Understanding at this evening's meeting.
4. Warren Campbell ITEMlTOPIC: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals,
Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Design Review Board
approval of an administrative approval, for a change to approved
plans, pursuant to Chapter 12-11, Design Review, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a change to the configuration of retaining walls
associated with driveway access, pursuant to Section 14-6-7,
Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, located at 1772, 1778, and
1788 Alpine Drive/Lots, 10, 11, and 12, Vail Village West Filing 1,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (DR607-0501) (10
min.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold, overturn, or modify
the Town of Vail Design Review Board approval of an
administrative approval, of the change to approved plans
application pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On October 3, 2007, the Design
Review Board upheld an administrative approval of a change to
approved plans application to change the configuration of
retaining walls associated with driveway access, for the new
residences being constructed at 1772, 1778, and 1788 Alpine
Drive
The Vail Town Council "called-up" the Town of Vail Design Review
Board approval of a administrative approval due to concerns
about the compliance of the retaining walls with applicable Town
of Vail Zoning Code provisions. Please refer to the staff
memorandum dat~sd November 6, 2007, for additional information.
5. Pam Brandmeyer ITEM/TOPIC: Teva Mountain Games Funding Request. (10 min.}
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: In August of this year,
Untraditional Marketing (UM) was informed by USA Climbing that
the Climbing Wall World Cup had been awarded to Vail.
Originally, UM w<~s going to ask the Commission on Special
Events (CSE) for '08 cash funding of $110,000 ($90,000 was
awarded in 2007). Due to this additional award of the World Cup,
UM is now requesting another $50,000, bringing the overall cash
funding between the CSE and Council Contributions to $160,000,
with in-kind of $4,500. The event has now been seen and
endorsed by the CSE, with a recommendation Council provide the
additional $50,000 in funding for the '08 Climbing Wall World Cup.
At this time, the CSE average of contribution toward the TEVA
Mountain Games is $95,000, which final action will be taken at
their next regular meeting, Tuesday, November 27. When this
was presented to Council back in September, Council asked to
have a.thorough review of the merit of the Climbing Wall World
Cup, and if needed, return to Council for '08 funding of this
specific event. The CSE listened to the full funding request of
$160,000 on October 23, but with over $1.3M in special events
requests, felt they did not have the funds available to support this
additional event.
STAFF RECOMME=NDATION: Staff recommends funding up to
$50,000 from Council Contributions specific to the '08 USA
Climbing Wall World Cup. Staff will continue to work with both the
CSE and the Vaiil Recreation District (VRD) to establish a
permanent climbingi wall location, a requirement of a mulitple year
award of this event.
6. ITEM/TOPIC: Infornnation Update. (10 min.)
• Vail Valley Athlete Commission
The Vail Valley Athlete Commission currently has three funding
partners at $10,000 each: the Vail Valley Foundation, the Beaver
Creek Resort Company and the Town of Vail. Discussions are
on-going wNail Resorts, Inc. Recipients of funding for the '07-'08
winter season are as follows:
Dylan Bidez Snowboarding $3,000
Tyson Bolduc Big Mountain Extreme Skiing $2,000
Ellen Feldman Snowboarding $3,000
Kevin Hochtl Cross Country Skiing $4,000
Zach Layman Snowboarding $2,500
Hunter Schleper Alpine Ski Racing $3,500
7• ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor & Council. (10 min.)
8• ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to 1) C.R.S. §24-6-
402(4)(a)(b)(e) - to discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease,
transfer, or sale of property interests; to receive legal advice on
specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a
strategy and instruct negotiators, Re: leasing Town owned
property. 2.) C.R.S. § 24-6-402(4)(f) - To discuss personnel
matters, Re: Annual reviews of the Town Manager, Town Attorney
and Municipal Judge. (105 min.)
9• ITEMlTOPIC: Adjournment. (4:15 p.m.)
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BEGIN AT TBD, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2007 IN THE VAIL TOWN
COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
October 22, 2007
1:OOpm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS /PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657
12:00 Training Session with Public Works (lunch will be provided) Tom Kassmel /Greg Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Dick Cleveland Anne Gunion
Rollie Kjesbo
Michael Kurz
Bill Pierce
Scott Proper
David Viele
Site Visits:
None
Please note: Times of items are approximate and subject to change.
30 minutes
1. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to 12-3-7, Amendments, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning from
Arterial Business District to Lionshead Mixed Use 2, located at 953 and 1031 South Frontage
Road (a complete legal description is available for inspection at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department), and setting forth Details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0021)
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by Thomas Miller
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Recommendation of approval with condition(s)
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: 5-0-1 (Cleveland
opposed)
1) That this request to amend the zone district boundaries of the Town of Vail Official
Zoning Map to rezone Lots 1 and 2 of the proposed Ever Vail subdivision as
Lionshead Mixed Use-2 District will become effective upon review, approval, and
recording of the Ever Vail Final Plat by the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Warren Campbell made a presentation to the Commission per the staff memorandum.
Dominic Mauriello, Mauriello Planning Group LLC, representing Vail Resorts Development
Company, made a presentation to the Commission. He stated that this request is the logical
step after the Town Council adopted amendments that incorporated the Ever Vail area into the
boundaries of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. He added that this was not the last
step in the review of the development of Ever Vail.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner Viele disclosed that he is an adjacent land owner. He did not. believe this would
affect his ability to act impartially.
Commissioner Proper asked if the CDOT right-of-way. transfer did not occur, would the land
would revert to the way it is today.
Page 1
Warren Campbell answered that if the CDOT right-of-way exchange did not occur, the final plat
for the area could not be recorded, therefore the new parcels would not be created and the
requested Lionshead Mixed Use-2 zoning would not apply.
Commissioner Cleveland was very concerned about making a recommendation on a proposed
rezoning prior to the review of conceptual plans for the development and discussion of the
impacts. He stated that while there have been talks about certain issues including transportation,
retail, etc., but they have not had any conversations regarding housing, or other issues. He
stated that he would suggest a Developer Improvement Agreement so this development would
be required to go before the Vail Town Council. This way, the Vail Town Council could be party
to conversations regarding parking, transportation in general, and housing. He gave the Front
Door development review process as an exarnple.
Commissioner Proper asked whether those i~;sues would be addressed at the PEC level.
Warren Campbell stated -that all the impacts identified by Commissioner Cleveland would be
reviewed under the Commission's review of any development plan.
Commissioner Viele had major concerns with incorporating an additional level of development
review. He stated he has concern with the Town Council having another level of review because
this should be an evaluation of the project and not a politicization of the process and of this
project's review.
Dominic Mauriello said that the current process is in line vvith the town's process for future
planning.
Jim Lamont clarified that mitigation of loading/delivery and other impacts of a development is
required by zoning or by the Town Council. -
30 minutes
2. A request for final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Major
Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the
Lionshead Inn and Lionshead Inn Annex (Fogata), and a request for final review of conditional
use permits, pursuant to Section 12-7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses, First Floor or Street
Level, Vail Town Code, to allow for attached accommodation units, lodge dwelling units, and
multiple-family residential units on the first floor, and pursuant to Section 12-7H-5, Conditional
Uses: Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building); Vail Town Code, to allow
for the development of a private parking lot, located at 701 and 705 West Lionshead Circle/part
of Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-
0027, PEC07-0028)
Applicant: Lionshead Inn LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
EXTERIOR ALTERATION
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 4-2-0 (opposed Pierce
and Kjesbo)
For Design Review
1) That the Developer receives final review and approval of the proposed
development plan by the Town of Vail Design Review Board, prior to making an
application for the issuance of a building permit.
Page 2
2) That the Developer work with Staff and Design Review Board to satisfactorily
address the items identified in Jeff Winston's letter dated October 6, 2007.
Prior to Submitting for Building Permits
3) That the Developer submits a complete set of civil engineered drawings of the
Approved Development Plans, including the required off-site improvements, to
the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval,
prior to making application for the issuance of a building permit for the Fogata
improvements.
4) That the Developer shall address all comments and conditions identified in the
memorandum from the Town Engineer dated October 1, 2007, (Attachment F) on
the plans submitted in conjunction with building permits.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
5) That the Developer pays in full; the employee housing mitigation fee of
$2,783,240.60 prior to the issuance of the building permit for Fogata.
Prior to Requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
6) That the Developer prepares a Fogata Art in. Public Places Plan, for input and
comment by the Town of Vail Art in Public Places Board, prior to the request for
a temporary certificate of occupancy. Subject to the above input and comment
by the Art in Public Places Board, the Applicant will determine the type and
location of the art to be provided. Said Plan. shall include the funding for a
minimum of $70,000.00 in public art improvements to be developed in
conjunction with the Fogata project.
7) That the Developer provides the legally executed and duly recorded Type IV
deed restriction with the Eagle County Clerk 8~ Recorder's Office, for the on-site
employee housing unit, and that said unit shall be made available for
occupancy prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the
Fogata project.
8) That the Developer shall be assessed a transportation impact fee in the amount
of $6,500 per increased vehicle trip in the peak hour generated (42 trips), or
$273,000, created by the Fogata project. The total fee of $273,000 shall be paid
in full by the Developer prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of
occupancy or certificate of occupancy for the Fogata project. At the sole
discretion of the Town of Vail Public Works Director, said fee may be waived in
full, or part, based upon the completion of certain off-site improvements.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 4-2-0 (opposed Pierce
and Kjesbo)
Warren Campbell made a presentation to the Commission per the staff memorandum.
Commissioner Proper asked Mr. Campbell to clarify whether one housing mitigation option is
preferred over another.
Page 3
Warren Campbell verified that no method was weighted over another within Ordinances No. 7
and 8, Series of 2007.
Dominic Mauriello, Mauriello Planning Group LLC, representing the applicant, noted that he
believed the housing mitigation plan is intended to allow the applicant the discretion to decide
which mitigation method to pursue.
Edwardo Illanes, OZ Architecture, representing the applicant, presented an overview of the
architectural changes that were made since the Commission's last hearing.
Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowner's Association, disagreed with Dominic that the public and
any other interested party can provide input 1:o the Commission about the mitigation methods for
employee housing. He contended that the Commission has final approval over the mitigation
method. He is also concerned that the Housing Department has not. yet created a master plan of
where employee housing units should be located and that housing policies have not been
finalized.
Eustaquio Cortina noted that their project has already been delayed by a moratorium to address
accommodation units, and asked that the Commission make a decision on this project and not
delay it for more housing policies. He believes the project complies with today's requirements
and the character of the neighborhood.
Commissioner Proper thanked staff for the 1thorough outline and believes the project complies
with the code.
Commissioner Kurz thanked the applicant for' the numerous revisions that were made and stated
he believes the project is ready to-move forward.
Commissioner Pierce asked the applicants too clarify the circulation patterns and parking for the
project. The applicants clarified the issue. i:,ommissioner Pierce also asked Staff to clarify the
employee housing requirements, and Warren Campbell explained. He noted his concern that
freestanding sheds and butterfly roofs are :>pecifically not permitted by the Lionshead Master
Plan architectural guidelines, but he believes the remainder of the project has been well done.
Commissioner Kjesbo agreed that good changes have been made in terms of architecture. He
noted his concern that there isn't enough land to accommodate employee housing in Vail and he
will not support this project without more on-site employee housing.
Dominic Mauriello asked if deed restricted other units in Town would affect his opinion.
Commissioner Kjesbo noted that he will require more on-site housing of this project and others,
as deed restricting units within Town does not increase the number of units available within the
boundaries.
Commissioner Viele stated his concern that an employee housing policy has not yet been
drafted by Staff and the Housing Authority. Ike noted the weight $2 million of up-front mitigation
fees puts on a development.. He believes the project complies with all other standards. He
doesn't believe the applicant should be delayed any longer by the Town's inability to provide
direction on what methods should be pursued with affordable housing mitigation.
Dick Cleveland noted his concern about the "live bed" definitions and policies. He asked about
the correlation between the number of actual beds in the old project and the likelihood of the new
Page 4
project's dwelling units participating in a rental pool. He believes the applicant has made many
efforts to make it more likely that the units will be rented.
Rocky Cortina clarified how the project was designed to comply with the intent of the master plan
for "live-beds".
Commissioner Pierce reiterated that both.he and Commissioner Kjesbo have voted in opposition
of the project because there is no clear, adopted employee mitigation plan provided to aid the
Commission in determining what method of mitigation should be pursued.
10 minutes
3. A request for a final review of a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Major
Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a dwelling
unit at the Lionshead Inn, located at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block 2, Vail
Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0061)
Applicant: Lionshead Inn, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-0-0
1) Approval of this major exterior alteration for the construction of a new dwelling unit at
the Lionshead Inn, located at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block 2, Vail
Lionshead Filing 3, shall become valid upon the Planning and Environmental
Commission granting final approval of the Applicant's proposal to redevelop the
Lionshead Inn building (i.e. Fogata PEC07-0027 and PEC07-0028).
2) Approval of this major exterior alteration for the construction of a new dwelling unit at
the Lionshead Inn, located at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block 2, Vail
Lionshead Filing 3, shall be valid until June 30, 2008, or until the demolition of the
Lionshead Inn building, whichever occurs first.
3) If the Lionshead Inn building has not been demolished or otherwise rendered un-
occupied, the Applicant shall revert the new dwelling unit for the construction of a
new dwelling unit back into three accommodations as originally configured prior to
December 1, 2008.
4) The new dwelling unit at the Lionshead Inn, located at 705 West Lionshead Circle/Part
of Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, shall not function as business office (i.e.
real estate office).
Bill Gibson made a presentation to the Commission per the staff memorandum.
There was no public comment.
The Commissioners supported the proposal.
10 minutes
4. A request for a final review of a variance, from Section 14-3-1, Minimum Standards, pursuant to
Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for deviations from minimum deflection
angle for driveway access, located at 2755 Snowberry Drive/Lot 10, Block 9, Vail Intermountain
Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0062)
Applicant: Dave Hilb, represented by John G. Martin, Architect
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
Page 5
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: (Pierce VOTE: 6-0-0
1.) This approval is contingent upon the Applicant providing the Town of Vail an
easement for those existing portions of Snowberry Drive located on Lot 10, Block 9,
Vail Intermountain prior to submittal of any building permit applications for Lot 10.
Bill Gibson made a presentation to the PEC per the staff memorandum.
John Martin, applicant's representative, gave a brief presentation.
There was no public comment.
Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, explained they Public Works Department's position that there is a
hardship based upon the road location, and that the proposal does not pose a safety risk given
the limited amount of traffic.
Commissioner Viele asked if the applicant was agreeable to the recommended condition of
approval.
Dave Hilb, applicant's representative, confirmed that he accepts the condition of approval
10 minutes
5. A request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C=3, Conditional
Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for modiifications to a public building (emergency power
generator), located at 75 South Frontage .Road West (Town of Vail Administration
Building)/Unplatted, and setting forth details iin regard thereto. (PEC07-0063)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Nicole Peterson
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: \/iele VOTE: 6-0-0
Nicole Peterson made a presentation to the Commission per the staff memorandum.
John Gallegos, Town of Vail Facilities Maintenance Manager, stated that the current location of
the emergency power generator is not working and a new location is necessary. The proposed
location represents the best option.
Commissioner Proper asked what the underlying zoning is of the property.
Warren Campbell answered that it is zoned General Use.
Commissioner Pierce asked about technical requirements for the generator and the cooling
space.
John Gallegos said that the current location causes overheating of the generator as there is not
enough fresh cool air intake.
Commissioner Cleveland asked whether the parking space is used for parking.
John Gallegos answered that jersey barriers are blocking the space as there are ice and snow
shedding issues from the roof above. The new generator enclosure roof has been designed to
alleviate this concern.
Page 6
20 minutes
6. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council, pursuant to Section 12-3-7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, for prescribed regulation amendments to Title 12, Vail Town
Code, to require public art for certain development .and redevelopment projects in Lionshead
Mixed Use 1, Lionshead Mixed Use 2, Public Accommodations, Public Accommodations 2,
Commercial Core 1, Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3, Ski Base Recreation, Ski Base
Recreation 2 and Special Development Districts, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
(PEC07- 0033)
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Rachel Friede
ACTION: Recommendation of denial
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Proper VOTE: 4-2-0 (Kjesbo and
Pierce opposed)
Rachel Friede made a presentation to the Commission per the staff memorandum
Leslie Fordham, AIPP Coordinator, stated that the AIPP Board was concerned about whether a
50% increase in gross floor area was too high a threshold for requiring public art.
Commissioner Pierce asked if there are other cities that require public art in private
development.
Leslie Fordham answered that San Francisco, San Diego, San Jose, Santa Monica, and Denver
(in redevelopment districts) require public art. She stated that public art in some capacity has
been required for certain development projects in the Town of Vail for quite some time.
Commissioner Cleveland added that Chicago has a requirement for public art.
Commissioner Viele asked if there is a set dollar amount attached to the requirements.
Rachel Friede answered that the public art would be performance based, versus having a
monetary value. This is due to a lack of a rational nexus between mitigation of development and
public art. The new requirements would not require art as mitigation of development impacts,
but would be part of zoning requirements.
Commissioner Viele stated he is not in support of the text amendments.
Commissioner Pierce suggested striking Section 12-25-2A. He asked for clarification regarding
the definition of a professional artist.
The Commissioners generally expressed concern about requiring a professional artist for the
public art, noting that an architect could also be an artist.
Rachel Friede responded that there is a provision for emerging artists.
Commissioner Pierce stated that public art approval should be under the purview of the Design
Review Board.
Rachel Friede explained that the text amendments would allow the Commission to make a final
decision on public art as part of the development plan, with a recommendation from the AIPP
Board.
Page 7
Commissioner Kurz stated that this a good start and that PEC should be the decision making
body in public art.
Commissioner Proper asked for clarification on whether public art is required today, and if this is
considered a tax.
Rachel Friede answered that this is not a tax as proposed, but would rather be a zoning
requirement.
George Ruther, Director of Community Development, commented that the reason 50% of gross
floor area or more was used as the trigger for public art is because this is a commonly used
threshold, including that for demo/rebuild.
Commissioner Kurz asked when would this would be implemented.
Rachel Friede stated typically the amendments would be implemented immediately upon
adoption by Town Council.
Commissioner Cleveland stated an example of requiring 1% funding toward public art, and that
this is only applied to public buildings, not private. He said he does not agree with requiring
public art on private property.
Commissioner Proper stated he does not support requiring public art on private property.
Community Development Director Ruther asked if PEC could comment on the process and
implementation of the text amendments.
Commissioner Kurz stated he thinks the implementation is good, but the percentage is arguable.
Art improves a project, however requiring it is difficult for a developer and difficult for the Town to
implement.
Leslie Fordham stated that the Board wishes to remove the subjectivity out of the art through
creating criteria for public art review. Commissioner Cleveland responded that the subjectivity is
not taken out as written.
Rachel Friede stated that one of the objectives of the amendments was to take the subjectivity
out of the art and referenced page 5, criteria. She stated the criteria lends itself to encourage
dialog void of subjectivity.
Commissioner Proper believes the amendment should reflect the .Town's priorities, and he
does not believe the priority is there to requirE~ it.
Commissioner Viele suggested that if priority is there, the Town shall commission a study of best
places and policy for art requirements.
George Ruther referenced the flow chart (attachment B) in regards to process. He stated that
Staff tried to simplify the applicability of the requirement by attaching it to already defined zoning
districts. He explained that Staff has- heard from developers that the current art as mitigation is
unexpected and late in the process, therefore this proposal tries to implement a clear
requirement at the beginning of the development process instead of late in the entitlement
process.
Page 8
Commissioner Cleveland requested opinions regarding the 50% gross floor area addition as a
threshold for public art requirements. Commissioner Proper felt the 50% is arbitrary.
Commissioner Kjesbo said 50% makes sense because it exists in other processes.
Commissioner Viele stated that Staff should not obligate the Town with a timeline, as it creates
false expectations.
Commissioner Cleveland commented that the AIPP Board's recommendation should not be
reliant on the artist's qualifications. Commissioners Proper and Viele also did not agree with
trying to define professional artist.
5 minutes
7. A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, to allow for an addition within the west side setback,
located at 2570 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 33, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13, and setting forth
details in regard thereto. (PEC07-0036)
Applicant: Ed Williams, represented by William Hein Associates
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Tabled to November 12, 2007
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 6-0-0
8. Approval of October 8, 2007 minutes
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 5-0-1 (Viele
abstained)
9. Information Update
The group discussed the need for more information on the mitigation of employee housing if they
are to be expected to review a proposal and vote upon an employee housing mitigation plan.
Staff suggested that they would schedule a lunch time training session prior to the next
Commission hearing regarding employee housing mitigation.
10. Adjournment
MOTION: Pierce
SECOND: Kurz
VOTE: 6-0-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon. request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published October 19, 2007, in the Vail Daily.
Page 9
s
PROJECT ORIENTATION
MEMBERS PRESENT
Mike Dantas
Tom DuBois
Pete Dunning
Brian Gillette
Margaret Rogers
NO SITE VISITS
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
PUBLIC MEETING
October 17, 2007
3:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
75 S. Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS ABSENT
2:OOpm
PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Montauk DRB07-0561 / 5 minutes
Final review of a sign
549 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Tom Ludwig
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dantas VOTE: 5-0-0
2. Moe's Original Barbecue DRB07-0450 / 5 minutes
Final review of a minor alteration (tables, fences and trellis)
616 West Lionshead Circle/Vail Lionshead Filing 4
Applicant: Moe's Original Barbecue
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dantas VOTE: 5-0-0
3:OOpm
Bill
Bill
3. Landmark Condominium DRB07-0489 / 5 minutes Bill
Final review of changes to approved plans (facades, railings)
610 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1 Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Landmark Commercial Development Co., represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dantas VOTE: 5-0-0
4. Lutsey Residence DRB07-0519 / 15 minutes Bill
Final review of new construction (new primary unit)
185 Forest Road/Lot 25, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Tom Lutsey represented by Segerberg Mayhew & Associates, Architects
ACTION: Tabled to November 7, 2007
MOTION: Dunning SECOND: Dantas VOTE: 5-0-0
Page 1
5. Littman/Stephenson Residence DRB07-0487 / 20 minutes Rachel/Bill
Final review of a change to approved plans (facade material changes)
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley Filing 1
Applicant: Andrew Littman and Robert Stephenson, represented by Snowdon Hopkins Architects, PC
ACTION: Tabled to November 7, 2007
MOTION: Dantas SECOND: Dunning VOTE: 5-0-0
6. Reiss Residence DRB07-0486 / 15 minutes Nicole
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (dormers and garage)
1784 Matterhorn Circle/Lot 3, Vail Village West Filing 2
Applicant: Helmut Reiss, represented by Stephen Isom
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Dantas SECOND: (3illette VOTE: 5-0-0
CONDITION(S):
1) The applicant shall enlarge the exterior of the proposed dormers to add architectural
interest and balance (south elevation) iprior to building permit application.
2) The applicant shall redesign the windc-w in the proposed master bath to be consistent with
the architecture of existing windows (north elevation) prior to building permit application.
Staff Approvals
Heather of Vail DRB07-0383 Scot
Final review of a sign
5197 Black Gore Drive/Block 13, Heather at Vail Condominiums
Applicant: Heather of Vail Homeowners Association, represented by Jesse Ankerholz
Leprino Residence DRB07-0449
Final review of a residential addition (bedroom)
2820 Aspen Court/Lot 14, Block 4, Vail Village Filing 11
Applicant: Nancy Leprino
Goldstein Residence DRB07-0466
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
2683 Cortina Lane/Lot 7, Block A, Vail Ridge
Applicant: David and Mary Goldstein
Giordano Residence DRB07-0491
Final review of a new construction sign
1107 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 7, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 7
Applicant: Donna Giordano, represented by Nedbo Construction
Nicole
Bill
Bill
Frank Residence DRB070-0496 Nicole
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (deck)
2602 Cortina Lane/Lot 2, Block B, Vail Ridge
Applicant: Terry and Sally Frank, represented by CFP Carpentry Services
White Residence DRB07-0510 Scot
Final review of a minor alteration (driveway)
1883 Lions Ridge Loop/Lot'4, Block 3, Lions Ridge Filing 3
Applicant: Ken and Kathi White, represented by Rocky Mountain Stonescapes
Page 2
Recht /Selsberg Residence DRB07-0511 Warren
Final review of a residential addition (deck enclosure)
4770 Big#~orn Road/Racquet Club Townhomes
Applicant: Dan Recht and Elain Selsberg, represented by Border Construction, Inc.
Raether Residence DRB07-0512
Final review of change to approved plans (windows, fireplace)
227 Rockledge Road/Lot 13, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Paul Raether, represented by Beth Levine
Bill
Ortiz Residence DRB07-0518 Warren
Final review of a residential addition (bedroom)
1234 Westhaven Drive, Unit B21/Cascade Village Subdivision
Applicant: Guillermo Ortiz, represented by Architectural Services, PC
Berkowitz Residence DR607-0520 Bill
Final review of change to approved plans (windows, roofing material)
315 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Howard and Judy Berkowitz, represented by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects PC
Vail Cascade Resort & Spa DRB07-0528 Bill
Final review of a minor alteration (curb and ramp)
1300 Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village Subdivision
Applicant: Vail Cascade Resort & Spa, represented by G.H. Daniels & Associates
Miller/McKinnon Residence DRB07-0529 Nicole
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
695 Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 6
Applicant: Norm Miller and Sandy McKinnon, represented by Shad Blakey
Sirota Residence DRB07-0530
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
1593 Matterhorn Circle/Lot 28, Matterhorn Village
Applicant: Sandye Sirota
Vail Estates / Solaris LLC DRB07-0531
Final review of a sign
292 East Meadow Drive/Tract B,C, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Joseph Shannon, LLC, represented by Paul Smith
DeRose Residence DRB07-0532
Final review of a minor alteration (deck)
4515 Bighorn Road/Lot G, Spruce Park Estates
Applicant: Vincent and Susan DeRose
Nicole
Bill
Nicole
Monogram Real Estate DRB07-0534 Bill
Final review of change to approved plans (retaining wall)
745 Forest Road/Lot 7, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 6
Applicant: Monogram Real Estate, LLC, represented by K.H. Webb Architects
Page 3
SCV Partners, LLC DRB07-0535 ,Nicole
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
5136 Main Gore Drive/Lot 2, Block 2, Bighorn 5th Addition
Applicant: SCV Partners, LLC, represented by Brush Creek Landscaping
Morris Residence DRB07-0536
Final review of a minor alteration (driveway)
5117 Main Gore Drive/Lot 5, Block 1, Bighorn 5th Addition
Applicant: Linda Morris, represented by JD Masonry
Warren
Maslak Residence DR607-0537 Bill
Final review of change to approved plans (landsc;aping, floor plans)
1979 Sunburst Drive/Lot 12, Vail Valley Filing 3
Applicant: Samuel and Luleta Maslak; represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Lindall Architects PC
Forest International DRB07-0538 Bill
Final review of a minor alteration (paint color)
45 Forest Road/Lot 33, Block 7, Vail Village Filinc3 1
Applicant: Forest International, represented by Francisco Lopez-Guerra
Barborek Residence DRB07-0539 Warren
Final review of change to approved plans (retaining wall)
3265 Katsos Ranch Road/Lot 10, Block 1, Vail Viillage Filing 12
Applicant: Frank and Eve Barborek, represented) by James Mason
Yarusso Residence DRB07-0542 Nicole
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
5139 Gore Circle/Lot 7, Block 2, Bighorn 5th Addition
Applicant: Stephanie Yarusso
Telepas Residence DRB07-0544 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
1905 Sunburst Drive/Lot 9, Vail Valley Filing 3
Applicant: George Telepas, represented by Plath Construction, Inc.
Vail Residence DRB07-0545 Nicole
Final review of a minor alteration (windows)
770 Potato Patch Road, Unit 11/Lot 7, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch
Applicant: George and Beverly Vail, represented) by Beth Levine, Architect, Inc.
Town of Vail DR607-0547
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
Across the street from 264 Beaver Dam Road/Uriplatted
Applicant: Town of Vail
Repetti Residence DRB07-0548
Final review of a minor alteration (landscaping)
1001 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village Filing 7
Applicant: Ann Repetti
Nicole
Nicole
Page 4
Pitkin Creek Park DRB07-0549 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
4081 Bighorn Road, Buildings 1 and 3/Pitkin Creek Park
Applicant: Pitkin Creek Park Homeowners Association, represented by B&M Roofing, Inc.
Meadow Creek Condominiums DRB07-0550 Bill
Final review of change to approved plans (delete decorative metal diagonal bracing)
2500, 2510, 2520, 2550, 2560, 2570, 2637, 2733, 2743-2745 Kinnikinnick Road/Meadow Creek
Condominiums
Applicant: Meadow Creek Homeowners Association, represented by TRD Architects
City Market DRB07-0552
Final review of a minor alteration (parking lot)
2109 North Frontage Road West/Lot A, Vail das Schone Filing 3
Applicant: Dillon Real Estate Co., Inc.
George
Breakaway West DRB07-0553 Bill
Final review of change to approved plans (decks)
993 Lions Ridge Loop/Lot B-3, Block B, Lions Ridge Filing 1
Applicant: Breakaway West Condominium Association, represented by TRD Architects
Isom Residence DRB07-0554
Final review of a minor alteration (windows)
2199 Chamonix Lane/Lot 23, Vail Heights Subdivision
Applicant: Preston Isom
Nicole
Marriott Colorado Ballroom DRB07-0557 Warren
Final review of a minor alteration (sidewalk, handrails)
720 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, West Day Subdivision
Applicant: Diamond Rock Hospitality, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Lindall Architects
Ford Theater DRB07-0558 Bill
Final review of a minor alteration (orchestra pit)
540 South Frontage Road/Ford Park Unplatted
Applicant: Vail Valley Foundation, represented by Morter Architects
Kearns Residence DRB07-0559 Nicole
Final review of a minor alteration (landscape, pavers)
2642 Cortina Lane/Lot 6, Block B, Vail Ridge Subdivision
Applicant: Desmond Kearns
Neher Residence DR607-0562 Nicole
Final review of a minor alteration (deck stairs, hot tub, stone path)
2400 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Hanson Chalet
Applicant: Soham Investments, LLC, represented by Jorge Neher
Vail Plaza Condominiums DRB07-0563 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration (stucco repairs)
100 East Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D
Applicant: Staufer Commercial, represented by Synthetic Siding, Inc.
Page 5
Kauffman Residence DRB07-0565 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration (re-roof)
636 West Forest Road/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Villages Filing 6
Applicant: Julia Kauffman, represented by Charlie Sherman
Mason Residence DRB07-0566 Nicole
Final review of a minor alteration (exterior rail)
2602 Cortina Lane/Lot 2, Block B, Vail Ridge Suk~division
Applicant: James Mason
Village Center DRB07-0567 Joe
Final review of a minor alteration (roof repair)
122 East Meadow Drive/Lot K, Block 5E, Vail Village filing 1
Applicant: Village Center Commercial, represented by Fred Hibberd
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Page 6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: November 6, 2007
SUBJECT: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail
Design Review Board approval of an administrative approval, for a change to
approved plans, pursuant to Chapter 12-11, Design Review, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a change to the configuration of retaining walls associated with driveway
access, pursuant to Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, located at
1772, 1778, and 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots, 10, 11, and 12, Vail Village West Filing 1,
and setting forth details iri regard thereto. (DRB07-0501)
Appellant: Vail Town Council
Planner: Warren Campbell
I. SUBJECT PROPERTY
The subject properties are located at 1772, 1778, and 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots, 10, 11, and
12, Vail Village West Filing 1 Subdivision.
II. STANDING OF APPELLANT
Pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, the Vail Town Council has standing to
"call-up" any action taken by the Planning and Environmental Commission.
III. REQUIRED ACTION
The Vail Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Town of Vail Design Review
Board approval of a administrative approval, for a change to approved plans, pursuant to
Chapter 12-11, Design Review, Vail Town Code, to allow for a change to the configuration of
retaining walls associated with driveway access, pursuant to Section 14-6-7, Retaining
Walls, Vail Town Code, located at 1772, 1778, and 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots, 10, 11, and 12,
Vail Village West Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Pursuant toSub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make
findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code:
"The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly
on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support
conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this
title (i.e. Title 72, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code) have orhave notbeen met."
IV. BACKGROUND
Platted Lots 10, 11, and 12 were purchased by Dantas Builders in 2004. Beginning in
November of 2004, at the request of the Design Review Board, Dantas Builders presented
more than twenty proposals in order to locate a new single-family residence on each of the
three separate lots. At a number of its public hearings, the Design Review Board
conceptually reviewed each proposal. On March 16, 2005; during a final conceptual review
of the proposals for general access and location of the residences,. the Design Review
Board agreed that access from one common drive at-the north side of the development area
was the best proposal for the site. ThE; Board's sentiment was largely based on their desire
for the preservation of as much of the southern area of the site as possible. Furthermore a
concern of the Design Review Board vvas the safety of having three (3) driveway curbcuts on
the curve in Alpine Drive.
On July 11, 2005, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a request for
approval of a minor subdivision, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivisions, Vail Town
Code, to amend the lot sizes and configurations and a request for a final review of a
variance from Section 12-6D-5, Lot. Area and Site Dimensions and Section 12-6D-6,
Setbacks, Vail Town Code, pursuant i:o Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow
building within the setback, located at 1772, 1778, 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots 10, 11, 12, Vail
Village West Filing 1.
Subsequent to .the Design Review E~oard and Planning and Environmental Commission
approvals and the recording of the simended plat individual plans for the construction of
three new single-family residences were submitted and approved.
On October 3, 2007, the Design Review Board contained a Staff approval for a change to
the configuration of the retaining wall:> associated with driveway access, pursuant to Section
14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, located at 1772, 1778, and 1788 Alpine Drive.
Staff approval of this application was based upon a site visit between Tom Kassmel and
Warren Campbell, and the submittal of an application and plan.
On October 16, 2007, the Vail Town Council "called-up" the Town of Vail Design Review
Board approval of an administrative approval due to concerns about the compliance of the
retaining walls with applicable Town of Vail Zoning Code regulations. The concerns
regarding the walls were the appearance as viewed from Alpine Road, the setback of the
retaining wall off of the edge of asphalt, and the impact to the site caused by the driveway
accessing the three new homes.
In reviewing the concerns of the Council, Staff has provided for review, a copy of the site
survey prior to the construction of the; driveway and homes (Attachment A). The survey of
the site prior to construction depicts that along the Alpine Drive frontage of these lots was a
steep road cut which was sparsely vegetated. Furthermore there was little area from the
edge of asphalt in which to store snow.
Staff has also included a copy of the plans approved by the Administrator to allow for a
reconfiguration of the retaining walls associated with the driveway access (Attachment B).
The plans as submitted and approved show compliance with the requirements of Section
14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code. The retaining walls were approved to be a
minimum of four (4) feet off of the back of curb on Alpine Drive. The Town Engineer
believed this to be an adequate space for snow storage and an improvement over what
existed prior.
In response to the "call-up" of this application Dantas Builders had an as-built survey of the
retaining walls (Attachment C). Fronn the as-built survey completed on October 22, 2007, it
can be seen that a large portion of tFie retaining walls comply with the six (6) feet maximum
height, four (4) foot bench, and mininnum two (2) foot setback off of property lines. However,
2'
there are some deviations to these requirements. For instance there is distance of
approximately 30 feet where the lower retaining wall is located closer than two (2) to the
property line shared with Lot 9. There are also areas where the bench between the retaining
walls is less than four (4) feet, 3.6 feet in one instance.
Boulder retaining walls are different than poured in place walls or keystone block walls. The
difference being that the irregular shape of the boulders provides less ability to have a
regular dimension to the face of the retaining wall. While there are benched areas in the
currently constructed retaining walls that are less than four (4) feet there are others that
exceed four (4) feet. In the past staff has viewed the benching of boulder walls as more of
an average. For instance there should be as many or more areas in excess of four (4) feet
than less than four (4) feet. Staff has looked to see if the intent of providing areas for
planting vegetation to mitigate the impacts of a retaining wall.
Upon receipt ofthe as-built survey Dantas Builders have acknowledge that there is a portion
of retaining wall which does not comply with the minimum two (2) foot setback off of property
lines. Dantas Builders will need to correct this ,concern in order to comply with the
requirements of 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code.
V. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE TOWN CODE
Chapter 12-3, Administration and Enforcement (in part)
Section 12-3-3: Appeals (in part)
C. Appeal Of Planning And Environmental Commission Decisions And Design
Review Board Decisions:
1. Authority: The Town Council shall have the authority to hear and decide appeals
from any decision, determination or interpretation by the Planning and
Environmental Commission or the Design Review Board with respect to the
provisions of this Title and the standards and procedures hereinafter set forth.
2. Initiation: (in part) The Town Council may also call up a decision of the Planning
and Environmental Commission or the Design Review Board by a majority vote of
those Council members present.
5. Findings: The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact
based directly on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact
must support conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the
requirements of this Title have or have not been met.
Title 14, Development Standards (in part)
Section 14-6-7: Retaining Walls:
A. General: All retaining walls are reviewed by the design review board or the
administrator to determine compatibility to the existing topography and the materials
in use. Retaining walls shall not exceed an exposed face height of six feet (6).
Within a front setback, retaining walls shall not exceed an exposed face height of
three feet (3), unless related to access to a structure constructed on excessive
3
slopes (in excess of 30 percent). Retaining walls associated with a street located
within a public right of way or ,access to an underground covered parking structure
are exempt from these height limits, but must be approved by the design review
board.
Retaining walls shall be located a minimum of two feet (2) from adjacent private
property boundaries and should be ten feet (10) from the edge of a public street
unless otherwise approved by the town engineer.
All retaining walls over four feE~t (4') in height, measured from the bottom of a footing
to the top of wall as per the adopted town of Vail building code, shall be engineered
and stamped by a licensed Colorado professional engineer (PE stamp) except in the
right of way, where retaining walls over three feet (3) in height, measured in the
same manner, shall require a PE stamp.
All retaining walls requiring a PE stamp shall be required to have submitted and
approved, prior to building permit release, engineered stamped plans, profiles,
sections, details, and engineE~ring analyses and calculations for each wall type as
required by the town enginE~er. At a minimum, unless otherwise directed, the
engineering submittal shall include PE stamped plans, and PE stamped typical
details with all engineering design parameters and calculated factor of safety
provided on the details. Plans and details shall be cross referenced.
8. Boulder Retaining Walls: Boulder retaining walls shall comply with all the standards
of subsection A of this section. The height listed for retaining walls is fhe exposed
height of either a single or combined height of combination walls. If the batter (slope
of the face of the wall) is greaiter than one to one (1:1), a PE stamp is required.
C. Combination Retaining Walls: A retaining wall should be considered a combination
wall if the upper wall falls within a prism defined as starting one foot (1) behind the
face of the lower wall at the loiaest finished grade line and then back at a 1.5:1 angle
from this starting point. The minimum bench of combination retaining walls shall be
four feet (4). All combination retaining walls shall have a PE stamp.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council uphold, with
a condition the Town of Vail Design Review Board approval of a administrative approval,
for a change to approved plans, pursuant to Chapter 12-11, Design Review, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a change to the configuration of retaining walls associated with driveway
access, pursuant to Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail Town Code, located at 1772,
1778, and 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots, 10, 11, and 12, Vail Village West Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (DRB07-0501).
On an appeal, the Town Council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the
particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support conclusions that the
standards and conditions imposed b~/the requirements of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, and
Title 14, Development Standards, Veil Town Code, have or have not been met.
Should the Town Council choose to uphold, with a condition the Town of Vail Design
Review Board approval, of an administrative approval, the Community Development
Department recommends the Town Council applies the following condition:
4
1. That the developer of Lots 10, 11, and 12, Vail Village West Filing 1, correct the
constructed retaining wall along the shared property line with Lot 9, Vail Village
West Filing 1, to be a minimum of two (2) feet from the property line per the
requirements of Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls; Town Code, prior to requesting
a certificate of occupancy for the remaining homes..
Should the Town Council choose to uphold, with a condition the Town of Vail Design
Review Board approval, of an administrative approval, the Community Development
Department recommends the Town Council make the following finding:
1. That the design review application for the change to the configuration of retaining
walls located at 1772, 1778, and 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots, 10, 11, and 12, Vail
Village West Filing 1 was submitted in accordance with Chapter 12-11, Design
Review, Vail Town Code, and is in compliance with Section 14-6-7, Retaining
Walls, Vail Town Code.
VII. ATTACHMENTS
A. Site Survey dated August 30, 2004
B. October 3, 2007, administrator approved retaining wall reconfiguration
C. Landscaping plan for the constructed retaining walls based upon an as-built survey
performed on October 22, 2007
D. Public Notice
5
i
...LGCL•ND-~~.~•-:-:..~ ~
s e~w X110111$-IOi99' /i~
Bsu~ - 3n.5BT P'°'
u1c - s&sY
ru+w+7 - ta.ce•
- _ /
- ~.ey.W qq-~yy / /
irvy ~ aoi1.1 '
/ / /
lams d orv~m~s! ~ / 55~
w~
CRAPEIIC SCALE ~ m,v.. /~
i ~
ly i' i
.~, ~ ~ ,~
~~
i ~'
'•
~% _ ,fib ~:
eo,..:~ ~
~
1/'/
f~ ~\\ /
I
/ ~ ~- ` ~~:
' . I .\ ~Y ,
l\~`
ro `.
`irkl. /~i}.~t
~„ ,.
/mo.
~I wrt a ioroFwrnn LOT 13
,~P•
%
~)~ rnr~~nnWf ff urvnmvs: s uwK.[ w utv. - oo~Ls
oVtci~ ar cu mi srowu ~. ~tt(m
u~grID~ucB[~nt=~w~m[xa~rt,
.) me eaumwr o~asnxz~rc~wom~~sw w~ruraw~
'
~1
o n'~wm nit o wirz~t'¢courun.
uslmrnoxi Mm >
~c sa,oK.~ m
wn m nn wr
.1 ~ .Wore .vva~x umm~ex.
;OTC
~~
,.,A ,,r p,a, ~
~i.e / ~.swrmavwi
~/~ /~
~~~~ ~\
~.~
LOOT m.11
. ~
n .,.o ~1..~ c>~
---s~t•ao
`1~ ~ 5B8'41'00'W -83.00' 37.0G
LOT 9
573V5'IB'E
~ 121.34'
LOT^ uO
saB'a'oo'w - 7a.zz'
I
3
P_
e
op
~ J N~8
~ 00
~ c ~BS5Fr
~ v :Ee
v
O ~
~ ~ ~,.
C7
a
0
~~a°
U~~~
~ ~"
OaOO
H cN
O_ W
E" ~
Q
a
$ O ~ 0
I \ O
3 ~ y<
n ~' G
P 3 3 &
,:::. m
~ ~ h ~
O3.D/, 06 0
i ~ ~ ~
- Attachment R
r •\ ~ Eww,D~dDBLTNgf
_ , i i NLH il--,~
PAP PgON ' 3 TIER BOULDER WALLS
W \~i. ~ IIW b' LDBBIE 1'-B' IH HDONT
~UD \ (fi'-1:11 BATiFR, 'n1.3'BE )
i~B /' ~\ !% ' // '\/ ~aa RE: BTRUC1UflAl
~\
S AFb ,yv~.., ~ ,(~' y' ' ,~ i~/- tNwrge w0 u
~\~'~.~~-v.r~^'~~'~~ l // Ix' NovE //" ~/> ~/ J'~ I.Ii7 !i
r NOTE: THIS PLAN IS VALID FOR APPRFl 3 '/ r 'r• /' S10.UCTURU CONGIETE IYALL
2~ /% RE: sT11UCNRN. "T
WALL LOCATIONS AND TYPES ONLY. MAXIYvtFJtv\1 // , ;' - ~\b =MRKP/GUMDRM L
Nyg~U~2~ ALGN AN6'ELEV Oi / L„ ~`Y;`' W~RfD uDNC TCP d BwLDER wN15 I
WALL HEIGHTS 6~. ~~ Yl'H~J BEEN IIOD° o \\ ~~~ / ~ !\- ~ ulz BA11ER, 111.5'BENG1) g
L ~ `.a/-~`/`~ "J ~ /f.. / " o - l i ~ L ~ -~ smucnRa I N
,>U~ ~ CATCH BA '/ ~bj / / ~ \ % ~ < ~\ -~_1- ~ c~-
pxP ADS / M1 ~~ ,~I f11
INDNE\ORNN ' / ~~.._ / - ~/ ~ "~.` ' ~ / i - -ACf>> O
cearntc scALe ~ ~'1 RW: Bg33.x /~~ . /' ~ ` - s~ T.a_`~,~eo-8 v"°~ i _ -,, ~ ~ ~ - T /
e.:. o l ~. ~ GadyBASU: G~" ~ / - / / ~ z \ .. ro.~,`c i ~ ~. ;. '" ~ L';' ~ / Y ~ /\ ~ 4D'
,. 12' Aus.Hnoqusi J'i. .a~.l ~i // _ -1 \ ~ 4. ~.}y~~-~~~ ~ 3 ~ ~ -' _ ~ p0
/vIUHE DRAW 1 P\. p. '1 ~/ / // .. / ~;\ _~ C ~>~ '~"i ~. 'r~<i:!' ~~ ~ auoo~ 'ZL. ~ ~, J Zp ~
/wV OUT:B036.5 ~~ ~% / ~ y% ~,~ - \:"' .. - -r / ~'`~~ a / ~: ~'' ~ / a .
tE: BOxTOM iRPli RNO WILL / / /' '%,/ /` / `v\ 1 ~~~:~ ~~ ~ / / '~ ~ ¢~ Z
ELEVA ORS REi'EII TO fWIBHCD GgAOE Oi / r r / % W _ J~" / /
TIES OTidA Oi S1PV91URF BELON GRADE i~'/ y / ~ / /4 / k, % ' /
1 ./, / .~ v 1'// ~ a% ~ \' I ~ ~~ / ~~ ~~~ A Dom' ~ ~ Q
REFER TO STIIUCNRAL fOP RALL OETAIL$ ~~ \ // ' ~ ~ " I ~~ r ~ ~ / . i i J
~! //R v~ - ; ~i o~~i~ i~ . Ee~ ~1'iG ,` / /' >\ f/yea. ~• .d~ i ~- , ~I~,y e, / ' . cyz~// / + ~ - _
/ I I y.~j~/~ i;Y+// /ice!' ~ ~ ~ /w~~~-~ .72si-?~\A. >\" '\s .\~ ~~ ~ 1eL°'t~'Y Vb~Fii~/ i~VN'/ _ ~t9si wiu .i / ~ f4~
// ~ / / ~ / / ~ /'' \ ~ ~>,~\ .~/ / o ~ y . ~ \ t ~~''~~. a~ , A :CJ, .l "now ui `i ~ , i~ ~ I1
\ ~/: K/ / /o~~'`p° %!i ~/%' 'L -6 ~~`' /} ~~//$. J ,~~ ,8+;~ \~k,jn~ >, e% /'"~.~~~ ~"'+,~'yX~?`'~~ ~ -' _ ' ~/1~~~I
/i ~\ ~'' a y~ n~ '~~ ,9 / .~%' \ \ ~ y4\ ,~~C~'~~``"/~`` •~E. ci / .hs'\ {~ i .~ '~ rGH aNOI TES uPINlP"ous
\ ~ Y j / ' i` l`.: h^/ ' T i ~~(( ~~y / VEIIBRNIE
~/%i l i / yj /"~"~ U: ~ \ / / '1e >,:$ ~ ~ / / / SEE SnyE fHwO
~~` ~- / / iliB~ •/ ems' ` '/'~, \ ~ - / ~~ . :~ / / ~~ T.. / diQl iWHtl 11 AFL OLTAIL'
I ^ \ ~ ~ i~_ fi! / X` /\/ / ~ Y i ~ f~!/ ;~,'( / ~.z( - .~ X;W~• i /' NaN~rN- ~ ~~ d d q "3
i `1 .. \\ .Yl `,~1 ~ , / ~ GRADE B ~ K ~ J P.~~"° ~ O~?~1 ~ \ / 9 ! ~ / / / ~ ~ ~ <
eaumEa wAUS ' / . P: ' !;~ ' /~ ~ w"" \/ . / < y /~ Ta~ /,.e~~d l ,ao / / / / ~ ' / / ~ ~ ~ 5 '2
roPF^ sTn c~R°i % `, a,^~~ / : si/~~~~` Ito(. ~:s~'~ - f~\ ` 4 ~ ) ~ ~../°~ I .~fi',•~ f!"r~' \ /~ / ~~ ~ `\ / ~ / / ~ _ - ~ / / ~ ~ ~ s ~
'v~'"-. ~ \' F,a~, ~ y~s~° /~p\i~ ~txi'~fiG`1"r" i~s~~~/~`~,r, a ~ / \ .'` / i \ '" ! / / /' / ~ ~~ s ~ ` _
\ r~.> Ali / 1t~`~~,~~,/~~ "~. r .l ~ / \` r / j / / i / wu~aoRSi"y~ ' ~ / / WALLS (Tri.TY'tfR.~. ~ j I/ / / I ~ ~ E ~ E $ o
TER STPVC1VRU 1vuL ~~~j`.~~,~-!'.~~~~~,~. / / ' / ~ ~ `<~l ~' / / ~ • / ' / ~~MEM / / J\ % ?' ~ / ~ y I / K F F F: ^ L"
(o\ nx BATIER. R'A65'BENEH) ~c~^i" .'• ~r;~.x'°. / / % ~~ ~ ~ / / / -~ /.:\ ~~" ~ ~ '
_ ~ \ / ~ ~ / / A5.0.21 LFS / ~ ~ ~ / / 'y~_ .ltd
' % / / / / ~ / G. ~. \ -..; ' moa.zol cis /' o i i \~ ~ /
' ~ / / . / J POPOSEDF'DIDEgDRAN / /' Y / `/ ~ / ~` / / / I / /
\ '' / / / FOR /)ituHyllTP) ' /'`~ '~~\ \~~ ' / / ~ / ~ /'I
:: :+A .u .an /v1./ / ~~_rG / 7_'_._. -_ _. /_ _~'_i- ~j ~ ~ / / /``._ / .J` -_ ~ J/ / / DESIGNED BY: CLA
in ....N .\, i / / / .' / / , ,°y:.~ / : / '/ ' ~ / \ / ~ ~ / / i / i8 ` PLC JOB/: I}52
., / / / ' / /_ ~: ~T. / / P YA0.\ DATE: }~)/D6
~..~s......n /~^\:' --r- / / -_ . ,'-~ -j/ -_-•_ ~.I ' i / %~'DESIGN EVIEW
""°'""'°R SWALE 9EHIND~'> \ __~~-~`~~ `~%' / 6T~FF-AP gOVAL\ SHEET
FOUNDATION WALL. ~: ~, ` ~ ~.• ~ -~- ~~/~ ~ • O-7
Attachment B
LOT 9
0
~`~, L,... ~ ~ III ~~~ ~/ ~;..~
P ~~ ' m,,. s e°.,.e
\\\\\\ e°,.:r~ em:..
°jrewc ~,w~w°n<°1~ ,ir e sa,.., I w~..e eo :.rc°" I MAT ~~H ORN VILLAGE
w.e, III ,o,;.", °°'°( LOT 71 \
e°u, I II ml . I e °1 emr., \
/ ~ eeva° \
ae.~ fC LOT 12 \ \
° ' \ \ \ \
\ ~ \
I
HIGHLAND MEADOWS
I a c°n°x xN~m i
I
LANDSCAP~ PLAN
~ ~
. ,..~,..,.,..~°~,.,.,..~,°., ,r....~..~°...~4,~~.~..~,..~a~,e.n.., \ I
\ \
~ \
I
~ \
\
OT 13
VAIL VILLAGE WE57 \
\
\
\
\ I
\
\ N
~
W
m
O
FILING No.1 \
\ \ V
O
\ \ M
\
\ ~ \ °: a iuu ",.`cu c
\ LP
~ ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - ~ - - - I Attachment : C
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing
in accordance with Section 12-3-3, Vail Town .Code, on Tuesday, November 6, 2007, at 6:00
PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:
ITEMITOPIC:
An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Design
Review Board approval of an administrative approval, for a change to approved plans, pursuant to
Chapter 12-11, Design Review, Vail Town Code, to allow for a change to the configuration of
retaining walls associated with driveway access, pursuant to Section 14-6-7, Retaining Walls, Vail
Town Code, located at 1772, 1778, and 1788 Alpine Drive/Lots, 10, 11, and 12, Vail Village West
Filing 1, and setting'forth details in regard thereto. (DRB07-0501)
Appellant: Vail Town Council
Planner: Warren Campbell
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage
Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public
hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for
additional information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
`4ttachment D
TOWN OF VAIL
AND
VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
THIS TOWN OF VAIL AND VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is made and entered into effective
as of the 6th day of November, 2007, by and between the Town of Vail, Colorado
("Town") and Vail Park and Recreation District ("District").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the District manages recreation and provides programs and services
to the public at various Town facilities, including the Vail Municipal Golf Course and
Dobson Ice Arena, pursuant to long term lease agreements; and
WHEREAS, the Town and the District have been working over the last two years
to cooperatively address (i) a substantial and expensive backlog of deferred capital
facilities maintenance items; (ii) a plan for funding ongoing facilities maintenance after
such deferred items have been addressed; and (iii) potential reconfigurations and
enhancements to the facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to memorialize their agreements and intentions
regarding the preceding items, while acknowledging that their obligations are subject to
the annual appropriation of funds necessary for the performance thereof.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants made herein and
other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
Parties agree as follows:
1. The Parties have agreed to a five~year funding plan regarding nearly all of
the Town's facilities operated and managed by the District with the exception of the Golf
Course (the "Non-Golf Course Facilities"). Such plan is attached to the Draft Non-Golf
Course Master Facilities Lease, the conceptual form of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A. While the funding commitments, attached as Exhibit B to the Draft Lease, are
subject to annual appropriation, the parties pledge to make a good faith effort to timely
and fully meet such commitments. The District acknowledges the Town has appropriated
in 2007 up to $56,000 for Ford Park Tennis Court Facilities.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\Town
Memorandum of Understanding v2.doc
2. The Parties agree to use their best efforts over no longer than the next three
months to resolve the backlog of maintenance issues related to the Golf Course and enter
into an additional five year Golf Course funding plan and along-term Golf Course lease
and along-term non-Golf Course lease by the end of January 2008.
3. In the interim, the Town hereby affirms the funding commitments
appropriated in its 2007 Budget to Golf Course facilities, including $95,000 for
engineering studies for bridges, tee boxes, the storage facility, etc. and $9,500 for
irrigation system design work.
4. The Parties intend that the obligations contained herein are subject to the
annual appropriation of funds necessary for the performance thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their pens hereto effective
as of the date set forth above.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal
corporation.
By:
Mayor
Attest:
Secretary
VAIL PARK AND RECREATION
DISTRICT, aquasi-municipal corporation and
political subdivision of the State of Colorado
By:
Attest:
Secretary
2
EXHIBIT A
TO
TOWN OF VAIL AND VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
(Non-Golf Course Facilities Lease)
TOWN OF VAIL
AND
VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT
LEASE
Zoos
{00017543.DOC /} 3
TOV~-TN OF VAIL
AND
VAIL PARK AND ]RECREATION DISTRICT
MASTER FACILITIES LEASE
THIS TOWN OF VAIL AND VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT
MASTER FACILITIES LEASE ("Lease") is made and entered into this day of
January, 2008, by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, a Colorado
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Town," and the VAIL PARK AND,
RECREATION DISTRICT, aquasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of
the State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as the "District". The Town and the District
are sometimes referred to herein singularly as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties".
WHEREAS, it is the desire of both Parties to cooperate in the provision of
recreation programs and services to the inhabitants and guests of the Town at.the Leased
Premises (defined below); and
WHEREAS, the District has been providing such services under lease agreements,
including without limitation the Town of Vail and Vail Park and Recreation District
Lease dated December 21, 1993 related to the Dobson Ice Arena and other facilities
referenced therein (the "Prior Lease"); and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of botlh Parties for the District to continue to provide
these services; and
WHEREAS, the Prior Lease does not apply to the Vail Municipal Golf Course
("Golf Course") or the Vail Gymnastics Center and the Parties do not intend for this
Lease to apply to such facilities; rather, a new lease applicable to the Golf Course is
being executed simultaneously herewith and the lease applicable to the Gymnastics
Center shall remain unaffected by this Lease; and
WHEREAS, in connection with idlentified major facilities repair and maintenance
projects necessary to be conducted currently and into the foreseeable future as well as
possible major renovations or reconfigurations of Town facilities, the Parties desire to
modify and supersede the Prior Lease and memorialize their intended relationship with
respect to the their rights and obligations in various Town facilities for the term of this
Lease; and
WHEREAS, the Town and the District are authorized by the Constitution and
Statutes of the State of Colorado, including Section 29-1-203, C.R.S., to enter into
intergovernmental agreements to govern the provision of such services to the inhabitants
and visitors of the Town; and
{00017543.DOC /}
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein,
the adequacy of which is hereby admitted, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE.
It is the general purpose of this Lease for the District to continue in the
occupancy of the Leased Premises and the management and provision of recreational
services for the inhabitants and visitors of the Town. This Lease shall supersede the Prior
Lease and any other agreement to which the Town and the District are Parties with
respect to the Leased Premises, and such Prior Lease and agreements are hereby agreed
to be of no further force or effect with respect to the Town, the District and the Leased
Premises.
2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT.
The District shall provide recreation programs and services at the Leased
Premises. Such services and programs shall be of high quality and shall be of sufficient
diversity and scope to meet the recreational needs of the inhabitants of the Town and the
visitors thereto.
3. LEASE OF PREMISES.
The Town hereby leases to the District and the District leases from the
Town the real estate associated with, and all improvements located on, in, or under, the
facilities set forth below and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto
(the "Leased Premises"):
(a) John Dobson Ice Arena and Environs ("Dobson");
(b) Nature Center and Environs;
(c) Upper Bench at Ford Park;
(d) Public Tennis Courts;
(e) Athletic Fields;
(f) Youth and Teen Center;
(g) Red Sandstone Athletic Field; and
(h) Donovan Athletic Fields.
This Lease does not apply to the Golf Course or the Vail Gymnastics Center, which
facilities are the subject of separate leases.
{00017543.DOC /} 2
4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. The District's use of the Leased Premises is
subject to the following terms and conditions:
(a) Use of Premises. T'he Leased Premises shall be primarily used for
recreation programs and services except as otherwise provided for herein.
(b) Utilities. The District shall pay all charges for gas, electricity, light,
heat, power, telephone, video, Internet or other communications services used, rendered,
or supplied upon or in connection with said Leased Premises, with the exception of the
Youth and Teen Center, and shall indemnify the Town against any liability or damages
on account of such charges.
(c) Access to the Premises. The Town and its agents shall have the right
to enter in or on the Leased Premises to examine them, to make and perform such
alterations, improvements, repairs, or additions that the Town may deem necessary or
desirable for the safety, improvement, or preservation of the Leased Premises.
(d) Changes to the Leased Premises.
(i) Neither Party shall change any portion of the Leased Premises
for which the other Party is responsible for maintenance, repair, or replacement without
the prior written approval of such Party, ,which approval may include conditions.
(ii) If the writing authorizing such change is silent as to the
ongoing responsibilities for such changed facility or other improvement, then the Party
who was previously responsible for such facility or other improvement shall continue to
be responsible for ongoing maintenance, repair, or replacement of the same. In the event
such writing is silent and the change results in a new facility or improvement the
maintenance of which has not been previously addressed hereunder, ongoing
maintenance, repair and replacement responsibilities shall fall to the Party making such
change.
(iii) All such work: shall be performed in a good and workmanlike
manner and all new facilities or other improvements affixed to the Leased Premises shall,
upon termination of this Lease, unless otherwise agreed at the time the Town's written
approval is obtained or unless the Town requests removal thereof, become the property of
the Town.
(e) Maintenance Repair~~ _and Replacement.
(i) The Parties generally intend that the Town shall be obligated
to ensure (i) that all mechanical systems, structural members and systems, and exterior
finish items (e.g., painting, roofing, windows, etc) are maintained in good working order
and in a f rst class and safe condition and (ii) that such items are properly repaired when
broken or damaged and replaced when they reach the end of their useful life. The Parties
{00017543.DOC /} 3
also generally intend that the District shall be obligated to ensure (i) that all interior
finishes (painting, drywall, flooring, etc.} are maintained in good working order and in a
first class and safe condition and (ii) that such items are properly repaired when broken or
damaged and replaced when they reach the end of their useful life. The remaining
provisions of this Section 4.(e) have been agreed to in the context of this general
understanding; however, any conflict between the general allocation of
responsibilities set forth in this Section 4.(e)(i) and any other specific provision of
this Lease, including without limitation the Master List (defined below) in Exhibit B
as amended from time-to-time, shall be resolved in favor of such specific provisions.
(ii) The Parties shall be responsible for maintaining, repairing,
and replacing the facilities and improvements listed in a master list attached hereto as
Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference ("Master List"), which Master List may
be modified or amended from time-to-time by acknowledgment of the Town's Town
Manager and the District's Executive Director. Where a Party is designated as
responsible for maintenance, repair, or replacement of a particular facility or
improvement, such Party shall perform the same at its sole cost and expense as and when
needed to preserve it in good working order and first class condition.
(iii) The District shall, on an annual basis, hire an outside,
qualified company to inspect and provide routine maintenance on the HVAC systems to
ensure proper working condition. A copy of an invoice or other documentation showing
the work performed shall be forwarded to the Town Director of Public Works.
(iv) Neither Party shall be responsible for the repair or
replacement of any facilities or improvements. damaged by the negligent or willful acts or
omissions (including without limitation negligent maintenance) of the other Party or its
guests, agents, employees, licensees, or invitees.
(v) On or before June 1 S` of every year, each Party shall submit to
the other Party for its review and comment an assessment of each of the facilities and
improvements for which it is responsible under this Lease (a "Capital Facilities
Assessment" or "CFA"). Each year the CFA shall include an evaluation of the adequacy
of maintenance which has been performed and at least a five year forecast of expected
maintenance, repair, and replacement items and an estimate of expenditures necessary to
accomplish the same consistent with the terms of this Lease. The Parties may prepare a
joint CFA if they desire. The first CFA is contained within the same spread sheet as the
Master List attached as Exhibit B hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Future
CFAs do not have to be part of the Master List spreadsheet, it being the intention of the
Parties that the CFA will be revisited and revised on an annual basis while the Master
List will not change.
(vi) Each Party shall keep an annual log setting forth actual
expenditures made for maintenance, repairs; and replacements required hereunder.. Each
{00017543.DOC /} 4
Party shall forward a copy of such log to~ the other Party on or before April 1St of the
following year.
(f) Recreation Projects Line Items. Within sixty days of execution of
this Lease, each Party shall create by resolution or other means acceptable to the other
Party separate budget line items known as "Recreation Projects Line Items" or "RPLI".
Subject to annual appropriation, each Party is obligated on an annual basis to appropriate
to its respective RPLI the minimum amount of funds necessary to make the expenditures
for the subsequent one-year period forecast in the five-year Capital Facilities Assessment.
While the Parties are only required to fwid one year in advance, the Parties are
encouraged to use the RPLI to set aside funds for expenditures foreseeable several years
into the future. Once funds are appropriated to the RPLI, they may only be expended on
maintenance, repairs, or replacement items required to be made hereunder or on
acquisition of new facilities or improverrients for the Leased Premises. However, for
purposes of this Lease, funds appropriated to the RPLI do not have to be reserved for or
traced to the item in the Capital Facilitie s Assessment to which they are related (e.g.,
funds identified in the RPLI in 2009 for replacement of a certain roof in 2014 are not
restricted to funding replacement of such roof). Any funds not expended in a particular
year shall be re-appropriated consistent v~/ith the CFA; provided, however, that such
remaining funds shall not offset or reduce funds required to be appropriated to the RPLI
in the subsequent year. If a Party desires to expend funds within its RPLI on any item
other than maintenance, repairs, or replacement items required to be made hereunder or
on acquisition of new facilities or improvements for the Leased Premises, the written
approval of the other Party's Council or I3oard, as the case may be, shall act as a waiver
of any claim such Party may have with regard to such expenditure. It is the intent of the
Parties that no other person shall have a claim for any alleged breach of this Recreation
Projects Line Items Section. On an annual basis, each Party shall provide the other Party
with a detailed description of its appropriations to and expenditures from its RPLI. Upon
the expiration or earlier termination of thus .Lease, any funds remaining in a Party's
Recreation Projects Line Items may be spent in any lawful manner, for any purpose, and
without any obligation to the other Party.
(g) Damage to or Disrepair of Premises. If any of the facilities
constituting part of the Leased Premises fall into disrepair or are damaged by any cause
so that such facility may not be used for the purpose for which it was intended or may not
be operated consistent with the standards and image the District or the Town wishes to
project, either Party may give written notiice to the other Party generally describing the
damage or disrepair and proposing a soluttion or process to reach a solution. If the Parties
are not able to reach an agreement to address such concerns within sixty days of such
notice, then either Party may elect one or more of the following options, as applicable:
(i) Continue to operate such facility unless such operation would
be in violation of any particular building or health code or any other law;
{00017543.DOC /} 5
(ii) Appropriate funds and make such repairs and replacements
on its own even if responsibility therefore lies with 'the other Party;
(iii) Terminate this Lease with respect to the particular facility at
issue upon 30 days written notice to the other Party, with this Lease to remain in full
force and effect with regard to the other Leased Premises; provided, however, that a
termination pursuant to this provision may not be exercised by the Town if the facility at
issue is subject to asub-lease, license, financing covenant, or other encumbrance;
(iv) Discontinue operating such particular facility (i.e., let it "go
dark"), with such facility continuing to be subject to this Lease.
(h) Surrender of Premises. Upon the expiration or other termination of
this Lease, the District shall promptly quit and surrender to the Town the Leased
Premises in good order and first class condition, ordinary wear excepted.
(i) District Property. All items of property purchased by the District
and not affixed to the Leased Premises shall remain the property of the District.
5. CONTROL OF THE JOHN DOBSON ICE ARENA.
(a) Deed of Gift. The District understands that Dobson is a multi-use
facility utilized for both recreation and other purposes by the Town, and further
understand the Town desires that the provisions of a Deed of Gift between the Town and
Elizabeth M. Webster, a copy of which is attached to this Lease as Exhibit C, be
complied with for so long as the Town determines its provisions to be applicable. The
District agrees that it will not depart from the provisions of said Deed of Gift without the
consent of the Town.
(b) Obligation to Use Arena. The District agrees to use its best efforts
to maximize the use of Dobson for conventions, meetings, conferences, concerts, and
other income producing or crowd-drawing events during the period it is not using the
facility for ice skating.
(c) Use By Town. During the term of this Lease, the Town shall have
the right to use Dobson for a total of thirty (30) days during each year of the term hereof
for whatever purposes it deems appropriate upon the giving of thirty (30) days written
notice of such use to the District. The Town may exercise twenty (20) of said days
between March 15 and December 14, and ten (10) of said days between December 15 and
March 14. The Town shall be responsible and shall have the right to negotiate all terms
and conditions of any activity or event the Town wishes to use the arena for during said
thirty (30) days. The District shall be entitled to receive the gross receipts or rent
produced by any such event less all expenses and costs thereof. The Town further agrees
to pay all associated hard costs during these thirty (30) days to include, but not limited to
{00017543.DOC /} 6
labor costs and utility costs. Notwithstanding the preceding, the Town shall not be
entitled to exercise its rights hereunder, even upon thirty (30) days written notice, if the
District has entered into an agreement with another Party for the use, maintenance, or
repairs of Dobson.
6. RENT. Rent for the Leased Premises shall be $1.00 per year, the payment
of which for the entire term hereof the Parties acknowledge has been paid and received in
advance.
7. PASSES. As a benefit for its employees, the District shall provide the
Town with as many season golf, tennis, I'Jordic, and skating passes as the Town requests.
Such passes shall be non-transferable. Use of the Leased Premises pursuant to such
passes shall be subject to all District policies, rules and regulations.
8. PARKING. The Town will provide twelve (12) parking spaces for District
employees at the Ford Park Parking lot a~t no cost. Further, the Town will provide to the
District as many parking passes and coupons for the Lions Head Parking Structure as the
District requires to utilize for its employe;es. These passes may not be re-sold by the
District.
9. PERSONNEL. The Town and the District and their respective officers,
agents, and employees shall fully cooper;~te so as to facilitate the performance of this
Lease. The provision of recreational ser<~ices and programs as contemplated in this
Lease, and the hiring, firing, and discipline of District employees shall be the
responsibility of the District. No person employed by the District shall have any right to
Town benefits including health insurance; and pension. The District, however, may invest
pension funds in the Town's pension fund subject to such conditions as maybe
established by the Town and permitted b:y law. The Town shall not be liable for the
payment of any salaries, wages, or other compensation to any District personnel
performing recreation services pursuant to this Agreement, nor for any obligation of the
District other than provided for herein. Nothing herein shall obligate the Town to be
liable for the injury or sickness of any District employee arising out of his/her
employment.
10. LIABILITY, INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE.
(a) District Indemnification. To the extent legally permissible and
without waiving any of the protections, requirements, and limitations of the Colorado
Governmental Immunity Act, the District; shall indemnify and hold the Town, its agents,
servants and employees harmless from acid against any and all liability, loss, damages,
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of investigating any
such matters, suffered or sustained by the District, its agents, servants or employees, or
by any other person rightfully on or about the Leased Premises arising out of any act,
error, omission or negligence in the operaltion, maintenance or use of the Leased Premises
{00017543. DOC /} 7
by the District, its agents, servants or employees or of any occupant, subtenant, visitor or
user of any portion of the Leased Premises, or any condition of the Leased Premises or
adjacent property; provided that this indemnity shall not extend to damages resulting
solely from the negligence or willful misconduct of the Town, its agents, servants or
employees.
(b) ,Town Indemnification. To the extent legally permissible and
without waving any of the protections, requirements, and limitations of the Colorado
Governmental Immunity Act, the Town shall indemnify and hold the District harmless
from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, costs and expenses, including
reasonable attorney's fees arising from the negligence of the Town, its officers, agents,
employees, successors and assigns.
(c) Insurance. The District and the Town shall respectively provide
their own public liability, property damage, and errors and omissions insurance policies
sufficient to ensure against all liability, claims, and demands or any other potential
liability arising from this Agreement. Further, the District and the Town shall, subject to
the approval of each Party's insurance carver, name the other Party as a coinsured under
such insurance policies and shall furnish evidence of the same to the other Party. In the
case of any claims-made policy, the necessary retroactive dates and extended reporting
periods shall be procured to maintain such continuous coverage. The District and the
Town may provide such insurance through programs of self insurance. Each Party shall
procure and continuously maintain the following minimum insurance coverages, or self
insurance capability:
(i) Workman's Compensation insurance coverage in the
statutorily prescribed amounts.
(ii) The following types of insurance coverage in the amount of
one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) per person and six hundred thousand
dollars ($600,000) per occurrence, or such limits as otherwise provided by the Colorado
Governmental Immunity Act, and one million dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate:
(1) General Liability insurance coverage. The policy shall
be applicable to all Leased Premises and operations and shall include coverage for bodily
injury, broad form property damage, personal injury, blanket contractual, products and
completed operations.
(2) Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance
coverage with respect to each of the Parties' owned, hired or non-owned vehicles used in
the performance of this Agreement.
(3) Errors and Omissions insurance coverage.
{00017543.DOC /} g
(4) Liquor Liability insurance coverage if the District
obtains a liquor license to serve wine, bE;er, or intoxicating liquors.
11. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Lease shall become effective on the date set forth at the beginning of
this document.
12. TERMINATION.
(a) Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Lease shall
terminate at noon on November 1, 2057.
(b) Upon expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, the District's
right to use the Leased Premises and all iimprovements thereon shall cease as provided for
herein.
(c) Failure of either Party hereto to maintain the insurance policies or
coverages required hereunder, or to pay the rent provided for herein within fifteen (15)
days of its due date or failure to perform any other obligation of this Lease within thirty
(30) days after written notice of default, shall constitute a material breach of this Lease,
upon which the non-breaching Party may immediately terminate this Lease; provided,
however, that if such breach is not capable of being cured within such 30 day period
using its best efforts, then the Lease shall. not be terminated so long as the Party in breach
is using its best efforts to cure such breach.
13. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
(a) Amendments, Modii~ications and Waivers. No amendment,
modification, or waiver of any covenant, condition, or provision hereunder shall be valid
unless in writing and duly executed by the Party to be charged therewith.
(b) Entire Agreement. This written Lease embodies the whole
agreement between the Parties hereto and. any inducements, promises, terms,
representations, conditions, or obligations made or entered into either by the Town or the
District not contained herein are void and of no force or effect.
(c) Binding_Agreement. This Lease shall be binding upon the respective
Parties, their successors or assigns.
(d) Severabilitv. All promises and covenants herein are severable, and
in the event that any of them shall be held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
this Lease shall be interpreted as if such invalid provision or covenant were not contained
herein.
{00017543.DOC /} 9
(e) Authority to Enter. The District and the Town have represented to
each other that each possesses the legal ability to enter into this Lease. In the event that a
court of competent jurisdiction determines that either of the Parties did not possess the
legal ability to enter into this Lease, this Lease shall be voidable by the other Party.
(f) Notice. Any notices to be sent to the Parties pursuant to the terms of
this Lease shall be considered made the day it is mailed via certified or registered mail to
the following addresses:
Town Manager
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81658
Executive Director
Vail Park and Recreation District
700 South Frontage Road East
Vail, CO 81657
(g) No Third Party Rights. This Lease shall not be deemed to confer or
grant to any third Party any right to claim damages or bring any legal action or claim
against either the District or the Town because of any breach hereof or any covenant,
condition, or provision contained herein.
(h) Specific Enforcement. In addition to any other remedies available to
the Parties in law or equity upon breach, this Lease shall be subject to specific
enforcement.
(i) Assignment; Sublease. This Lease shall be non-assignable and the
District shall not mortgage, hypothecate, or encumber any of the facilities set forth herein
without the prior written consent of the Town in each instance. However, the following
actions shall not require the Town's prior consent: assignment of the Leased Premises to
aDistrict-controlled enterprise; and, sublease of the Leased Premises for purposes which
further the District's provision of park and recreation services to the public, which
purposes include without limitation concession services, food services, performances,
sleigh rides, and other amenities.
(j) Obligations Subject to Annual Appropriation. The Obligations of
the Town and the Obligations of the District hereunder are subject to the annual
appropriation of funds necessary for the performance of such obligations by the Town's
Town Council and the District's Board of Directors, respectively, which appropriations
shall be made in the sole discretion of such bodies. If one Party is unable to perform its
obligations under this Lease in the manner as set forth herein, then the other Party shall
{00017543.DOC /} 10
have the right to terminate the Lease, anti both Parties shall have no further obligations of
any kind or nature, except those that specifically survive termination.
(k) Section Headings. 'the section headings in this Lease are inserted
for convenience and are not intended to indicate completely or accurately the contents of
the Sections they introduce, and shall have no bearing on the construction of the Sections
they introduce.
(1) Time of the Essence;. All the time limits and requirements stated in
this Lease are of the essence of this Lease.
(m) Duplicate Ori final. This Lease may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.
(n) Compliance with All Laws and Regulations. The District agrees not
to use or permit the Leased Premises to be used for any purpose or in any fashion
prohibited by the laws of the United States, or the State of Colorado, or the ordinances or
regulations of the Town.
(o) Additional Assurances. The Parties agree to reasonably cooperate to
execute any additional documents and to take any additional action as may be reasonably
necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.
{00017543.DOC /} 11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the District have executed this Lease as
of the date first set forth above.
Attest:
Secretary
Attest:
Secretary
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal
corporation
By:
VAIL PARK AND RECREATION
DISTRICT, aquasi-municipal corporation and
political subdivision of the State of Colorado
By:
ss.
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day
of , 20 , by as of the Town
of Vail Park, a Colorado municipal corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
{00017543.DOC /} 12
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day
of , 20 , by as of Vail
Park and Recreation District, aquasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of
the State of Colorado.
Witness my hand and official seal..
My commission expires:
Notary Public
{00017543.DOC /} 13
Town of VaiV Vail Recreation District
Borne Engineering Report- Summary of Cost Sharing- Preliminary Draft Dated October 5, 2007
I,ocahoo Town Responsrbdrty
VRD Responsihdrty
Description
2007 2008
2009 2010 2011 Total Thru Total W/ 25%
2012 2012 Contiagencv
t~ennwrorat•atx_ AU _..- ;_...._ > -
Trnnis/Ford Park Repair Major Structural Issues >.A None, .. ,. '.:-. _~ - ..
Re
air Stair Treads .._:_.._..AI-GlubhouseGradmgandDramage :', ,t
42
Cl
b
,_
"._. _.__ _ _,
_ ,,~ _„_ _~, .,3,510
- ~° ~ _ x_3,510 ~
~" ~ __.4,387_'
r
^
.._ ~. _ _ ~-
Tennis(Ford'Park Repair'it4e3or StruMUral Issues
~ p
_ _
Repair Stair Treads `` ~ .
-
u
house -Structure- VRDResponsibihty
A2-Clubhouse -~Stivcture-Town Responsibility 100.0
--
aosli _
_ ..
_- `
"
1'000
" °
2250
- -
rT
ennislFordPark. AIL
'
n . ~~. ~ ... %;' : -'.:
"
~
° None. ~~
' ~ . ~
~ ~
A3-3Vood Sidin &Trim
8 - -
~ 550 - .
3,569 ' ~
4
119
. ' S 1649
~Teonu/Ford Park . All
:. ._
'
.. None _ ~ - • A4-Stone Veneer. ~ - - ,.
- ,
ITennis/FordParlc AIL. . 'None ~ - "AS-Windows ~- - ,
,
~TeunislFord Perk- -All : ,
TetttdsJFord Per ' z
k
All
~ : • '
y None ' ' , =
A6-Exterior Doors'_ -
.
. <;
..r,..,",... ,..
Tennis/Ford Perk None _
, ~ .None
All Painting and Patching A7-Clubhouse Roofmg _ _ _ _ _
.48-Clubhouse Walls and Ceilings T 500
8
112 _
~ _ _ 7 5110 _
^ ~ 8
y __ 9,375 t
A
Teruus/Ford Park None
~Terinis(Ford Park Routine Re
l
t
'
All normal wear and tear
A9-Clubhouse Flooring ,
- - ,112 10,140
p
acemen
s ° _, _
.
'fennis/Ford Perk Non ,_ -Any enhancements to,facilities A10-Clubhouse: Locker Roams _
., '
'
~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ _
33 746
~ -
- ~` `
3 -
~ 2, 2
6
e
iTenoialFord.Park . All major repairs~endreplaceimnts All r airs and re lacements
~ ~ Routine maigtenance ~ '
' ' AI (-1Gtchenrne _
_ _.
' ` ; A12,Mechanical_Systems `- -
' ~
100
-° -
6 977
~ ~ - -
1 222
"
8
TettnislFordl?ark All • . . -
- ..
T
nni
/Fo
P
d
k ;
Norn . . :
'
° .
;. A13-lTtt -
building.:5tructure " ~ t ~
.
.6,864
` . 258,719 ad5,583 1
331,978:
e
s
r
.
ar
All ...
tTennis/FdrdPark .All ~ ~
.; .. ".. .
None
~ ~ .. •~ .. .
None ;~ :. • ,
A14-CtvfUBlockVeneer ~ -
A15-Lo« SlopeRooFin
- ,
~ -
4 056
~ 70~'
.
.
iTennisJFord Fark Al! ".-'_; __, ._~ • " °
T
i
/
~
~
None .
g
>A16,OOtbudding"Rest_rooms _'
2000. 7 176
°- ~
. -
0 8l
enn
s
F
ord Park Overlays
- , _
?etinis/FordPark' Overlay
~
' Routine crack fill
~.. _
R A17-Asphalt Walkways VRD Responsibility
_.
-
~
_
~ ~ 4,050 "`~" __
_
-
-
- _ . __,..,.._ ._. _..
• _ _ ._ _
.
t Y„
.. ~..,~
TennislFord Park '
All Re
lacem
nts•• `
~ outinecraakfih~ ..
Mi
f
s '
~` .
AI7-Asphalt Walkways-ToHnResponsibilit}.
' .
<
.._ 37,9b4 -
~
3
3
x4
p
e
:,,
..,
,,,
JTennis~ordPark`~ Town.: ,_
norcrack,
l.~
-
tll
. .
"
N
~ ~ `...~' ;AlB-COncrete,Walkwaps.
r, F. '..,...,
.
-~: '
.. 5365~
.
5
~
65
6,706:
.
-
ennisffard Park :Town ~.
t , . _ -
~T
i .
one
, ~
None
^ ... AI9-BnckPavers
•
-
A20-M$$ Retarm Walls
ug
-
704
-
-
,
2 704
-
379'
Temi
a/FardPark, Replace..
Teimi
lF
d P
IC D
o
~ Paint R Itfaintain All-Metal~liand Rahrgs
~
~ X875
s
or
ar
uecti
ml and Infortnahonal -
"
!
IT
earuslpord'Packr All
.. Internal Facility Srgnage _ ,',~
A21,~Signage -
_ ~
'
~ ~
::
~ 4,095 4;095' : - 5! 8?
,
.
Tennis/Ford Park None None
All ;.
. A23.LighhngUnps,~ ._,.
,
~. ~.A ~~ ,'Rrr 811..` , -.8,1,^12 -`.10'140'°
Tennis/Ford Park None
All A24-Bell Field Lading and Drainage 8,000 2,ti00 2,704 2,812 2,925 9,733 28,774 35,968
Tennis/Ford Park None
All A25-Ball Field Chain Link Fence ~ 5,20(i 5,206 6,507
7ennislFord Park None
All A26-Bleachers
A27-Ball Field Accessories 23,111 23,111 28,889
Tennis/Ford Park Replacement TBD Time clceks- Replacement TBD A28-Irrigation System 4,160 4
160 5
200
Tennis/Ford Park None _ _
kTennis/FordPerk: All
'`' All
;' ;:
N
n A29-Tennis Courts-Resurfacing
_ _ __ ._ _ _ _
5
--
-
~
O8 , ,
, _ .,
.._. ._.._:_~ , _"_.
Tennis/Ford Perk Replacement of Poles .
o
e
~
__.___- . -- _ :...,,.. .-
Chain Lirilc Repairs & Wind Screen
~. , ,_A30-TenntBCOurtRetatmngWalls _ ,~
A31-Tennis Court Fenemg- VRD Portion .
~
z ;„T _ _;'- _.189800µ._~..
11
287 ~~ - -
'° f
_
~~-~~~~ ~ W°#~ ~ _ -
__
125~
x23
~
~
~
~t
~TenaisrFord l'ari: Replagement ofPolp ~-"
Y .~~Chain Lrnk Repaus & Windscreen ~ ~ A3i-Yentas GourtFencing-Town Portion ~'~'
~ ,
42;Opp`
' 13 ?33
02
0
-
000
4
_ _
1 27
5
-
Stm
'
a
~
outh Svcs All ~
Y _, :._ _..:._ _ .~:
Youth Svcs None . -
_
. _ ?`?~ . , _..._._ .. . _ _. `_ .
•:.. -
_''_.' ; Bl-Slncture -~
_ _.. ___ .0. -- .: - ^ 3 SOD
°-- "-, __..,_.:,. _,.--- ° __, _ ...:.:,.. _ '
___ ,~_>... '.a,. .,,
3;500 -
~
.
~ 4373
,
Youth Svcs None All
All B2-Walls and Ceilings 5,544 5,544 _
6,930
Youth Svcs None ~
All ~ B3-Flooring
B4-Kitchen 20,000 4,802 24,802 31,003
Youth Svcs None
All ~
BS-Televisions 12,157 12,167 15,208
Youth Svcs None
~- - .. __.
i;YoiJth Svcs , , i> Replacements - :^ _ ^",
... - All
• Rouhn I•faintenartce ' ~ . B6-A t A
c rv~ty ecessones
, BZ Furnaces
-
~
19 500
.:., -
040 -
Youth Svcs ADA- Splrt 50%/50%
__.
Yo
th Sv
AD
50°
S ADA Split 50°io/50%
~ ,
. .....,
B8-Elevator System- VRD Portion
'
`- - ~ _ ~._4_ -~ ~ -~ -~ 112,485 - ~ ~~ - - 112,485 -- _140,608
os
u
A-
ht 50%!
io
Y
th S ADA S Jtt 50%1~0°h- _, m `
_ _ B8.Elevator S stem-Town Portion
_
.... _ Y _ .. _ -
~ '-- - _... `
112486'
.~
112
486
..140508 t
ou
vcs None _
._. _. -
(Dobson - All' .: All
_
' '
e _ B9-RedSandstone Elementary Crym
-
~•
_ _
5 760
- - _
.. _
1,587
- _ _ ,~ _
,
8,447 _
10 559
1
_
-
~ _
Non
~
Tl
e
CI•Gredingand
,
Draurag
e
6
^
,
- --
_
va." ...
;Dobson ''
All
~ on
;';Noce
~° C2Su
structtue
C3-SgpersWCture~~ _ .' '
5600
2 000'
1
,600
1
2,000
Dohson _, -All. , .
Doli
o
`
"
~ None _.' C4=ExteriorTnuisfomrerFouodation t
2,D80-
, 2,080 x,500
#
s
n
-
All ..
t)obson All
~
~, None - CS-Conprete Tdt-Up Walls , . ,. , . -
7
j 3;245 _
~ .3,245 4,U55
`
.. ~ ~
'
~Dpbswt All
, None
N C6-V/ood Tnm endBxposed Glulam Beams •
. 7,09
_ 5,350 12,446 15,558 ,
. one ..
•
C7-hfetal Siding '
r
' ..
'Dobson Exterior,calkmg:and replacement Interior Calking ~ ~ °- C8-1ViitdowS ~ ' ~ ~ - ~ - 1
190 - - ~ 1
338 2
528 ~ - - 3 160 "
Dobson Extenor calking andreplacemrnt
(Dob Interior Calking & Minor Repairs
" ." C9-Exterior Doois .,
1,7
30 ,
,
730
1
-• 2,163
.1
son All
-
D°i
bsuri
All ~ ' • '
r
~
. None. .;
~
No
~ - ~ - - CIO•Stee SlopeRoofmg
P
`
755,506.
~-
-
.
~
~ -
,
755,506
_
_
944,383
-
~
__.._...
.
-_. _
-
m . CI1-LowSlo Roof
_.__._.._.Pa mg---`---= . . ,,.
- ~
,,
Page 1 of 3
Town of VaiU Vail Recreation District
Borne Engineering Report- Summary of Cost Sharing- Preliminary Draft Dated October 5, 2007
Total Tbru Total W/ 25
Location Town Responsibilih~ VRD Responsibility Description 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 Contingency
1Dob`son. -,,.. ~ All ~ ' ~ n ; '~ ::
:
.
.
•...: " ~' None'" -.. , .. . .. ~- .. C12-Exhaust Stacks ""t ~
.
- ~ ~9 200. ~ ~ - .` 3,159: , :
12;359 :-' (5,448'.
i
,
Dobson, ..
' All _. ,
~ ,,
, ' ~' , .None; ,
Cl3•C'oncrrete Walkevavs - 1.825 _
`' " 1.825 ', 2,281-"
IDobsoi, , ..
'~_. All
"'° ~ '- ry :-
~~ ,.
None- `~~ ,~. ~
~ - CI4BrickPnvers - - - ~
- ~
- -
~°
1,38
' ~ 4;338
:1;673
~
tDotuotr _~All None.. - ~ CIS•RockR'alls -_ ~ ~ I,23T ~ .1,237 b ~
'1547-
IDobson _._ "; ` . ;All ~ ` . F_,;,;,, ,' _. _ . _. None; .. _ _ : C I6-Exterior Lighting 1;237„~_ 1.237 , ,1,547
Dobson Replacement Painting C17-Steel Gate 1,14J 1,138 2182 3,103
iDobson .~=NOne " _ AII. `' _ CI8-Interior Wallsa»dCedmgs 2'_.834' '7,53Z:`~° _ "50,371 _
62,961
'Dobson_~__w _`,None,.~~, ..-~"x_ '._:.. All 'i_ :~. _ _ _ .CI9.UrtenorFlooring_" __ _ _ . 1514. I,S74., .. 1637` _I 703 :'-,,,";~~428 . +;_8,034:
Dobson Replacements Bulbs and lighting upgrades C20-Interior Lighting- VR1} Portion 3,332 3,432 ..
4,290
Dobso',n r,~ -,j; R lacements tip.
eP Bulbsand h htin u des '-
S 8: PBt'a C'0.lnterior Lt ~htin Tom Portion
6 B- _ '
~ _ _ 18,858 I8,858 _
23;573
lDofuon _. All Renogadons~ - ~ ; Atldtttonal costsaf upgrades ' ~ - . C'.2t-1`hangmg Rooms
; ~ , ~ ,
~ ~
~ - ~ 20;196 ~
. 2,196 , T :25,24b
tDohson ". ' ~111'RenoCattons ~ ~ -_ ,_' ~. Atldtbonalcosts'ofupgrades .~. _ .
~' F2 Restnorns _;, ~
- - - 24912,,,,_,. , 24,972, ~-31,215;,
Dobson None All C23-Metal Lockers - _ _
Dobson None All C24-Concessions 2,912 2,912 3.650
Dobson None All C25-Ice Rink I,I~#4 8,21^_ 9,356 11.694
Dobson Replacement Upgrades and sanding and staining C26Bleacher Seating 3,1 I8 3,118 3,898
Dobson Replacement Painting C27-Hand Railings 4,054 3,407 7,461 9,326
Dobson Replacement Painting C28-Interior Doors .1,144 1,287 2,431 3,039
Dobson ~ ,;r.All ".._. - - .`. aNone- a..^.."._._ ."_' . _
. _:.-x,_C29-Sky,-_GghtLouverSystem~;_.t_ .,.- . _ .',. ..:,...~. 32,984- sF ._ ,..~.._.~_.....,....~. ._. _ 32;984 ~;,r :41;230
Dobson None All C30-Sound System IS,816 IS,$I6 19,771
Dobson None All C31-Scoreboards _ _
Dobson None All C32-C.laaa Smrane Cart _
.oBson Rep acent~m nuUtinc mainfenance ' ' " - C~~-nodrts ~ ~ ;- .: ~ . ' ~ ~
+'
-
Uebsan All ::-~ ~
~ ~~ None - ~-~ - - - C34-Ha Water Storage Tanks - ~ - - ~ - 10,000, .:
~
~ IQOW ~c 13,500.
Doh:on All excepittnk system ,. Rink s}'stenr-~[f any ~ ~ ~ ' C35-Heat Pumps - ~ ~ ~ -' ~ ~ ~' ~ _ .;, ---
- ~- - - -
tsDotison - Replacenent - Routine mamtenanee C16-Domeshe Storagq Tank _ ~ ~ ~'~ - - -
Dobson _
.... , "Replacement -
:: ~ Routine mamtonance -
- - C17-Boilet Dome tic Cuculntion.Sy stem ~ 20,800
t. ``
~ I,_ll ~ 22,037 27 547}
,llobson -~Replacenent ~ Routinemamtenancc ~;.
~ ~C3ft-Air Compressor,.' ~ '~. .1,100 ..
" ~-- ~ ~:~. :.
~ ~~~ ,"~ ~ 1,100 ',1;375
IDobsar
^ Replactinent _. _:~ . ~_
Roihinemarntetiance C39-GheromalFtedSys[em. '-~ ': L1-l~i, ,_ -' _t, a~,1144.t 1 __ ~`l_43~;
Dobs
on None
_ All C4[I-Rink C hiller System 7,487_ 7,487 9,359
fDO~son -
Allexceptnnksystem _
Rlnk~system-lfany
: _
_
,
~ C41-CopperPipmg'- ~ ~ _
- 2,200
~2,288~
^_,380 -=475.
- 2,574
2677
1453
~ 18241
`Dobson ~. Replacement .
~ Rou4nemauttenance ~ C4_-Central Au HandlinglLuts - '71;760 -' 71760 ~-~,89700b
kDobson , Rtplacetncnb ; ' Routtne nwullenance '.' C43-Overliead RadrantHeatmg _
(Dobson. _ .. All .,_t:_: _ _ . , .. Notx.y_ . . .._ ._ z. C44-Electrical Switr.hgexrs , s
_ _~~
- .,
~ ~' F ,
_ ~~ , ~
~
Dobson None _ All ~ C45-Forklift ~ 20,248 20,248 25,309
Dobson None All C46Zamboni _ _
Dobson None All C47-Man Lift 21,057 21,057 26,3:2
Dobson None All C48-Washer and Dryer 2,925 2,925 3,656
Dobson None All ~ C49-Event Stage ~ 9,880 ~ 9,880 1?_350
Dobson None - All CSO-Event Chairs 42,580 42,580 53,226
Dobson None ~ All CSl-Arena Deck Event Flooring _ _ _
Dobson None All CS2-Stage Drapes and Curtains 2,500 2,500 3,125
Dobson None All C53-Crowd Controf Dividers 1,456 1,456 1,820
Dobson None All C54Electric Spider Boxes and Cords 21,(142 21,642 27,053
Dobson Notre All CSS-Ice Skates 3 800 4 274 8,074 Io,093
AthleticFreld ~~^,Tmm .,-. ~'Y" _
°'C iNone ,':_ F1 Restroom/StorageFacrtity-Stnichr-e _
1, 100 ~~4 _ ~I,I00_ ^;1;375
tAthletic Field
~A
hl
F
ld Town : ; `,
~ T
'' ~ Noae ~ ~~
r' ;'F2,Coaled Lxtertgr Crypsum Bosrxl
' f,
`
'
d
'
t
etc
ie
,; . own t _ None
- "
F3-Wood Tnm, Posta.
Beams
an
~ 2475 2,475 3093
~~WfeNcFttld- .. ': Extenorcalkvtgandieplecemerit.'
' Inten6rCefkmg&MmorRepa~rs ,~ ~.,' F4-Exterior Doors ~ '
. -, -- :,,.- ,_, -... _ „-.__- °_, k„ ~
. ;t .,"„__.~.3'_ _---......- ._ u
Athletic Field Town None- Unless golf balLdamage FS-$teep Slope Roofing 9,997 . 9,997 12,496
Athletic Field Crowning to be split Crowning to be split- VRD to maintain F6-Field Gradin and Drainaee
g
- 3,500 3,500 4,3
75
..1_thletic Fteld ~
..,~..All_. .,,. _. ,, _...t _ _ _ -
.::._e_ None.,. .._ _ 1. _,x__.~:4, - -
-
_ `: ,; F7_AsphaltPadungLot _.. ,'
_.-_. _ _..,,..._-_ _
>;
," '977,18,.
~
_ _ ~ _ .. _ _
_. _. 12483
;•.- 110,201_ .
„s 137752,.
,
Athletic Field None All F8-Football Goal Posts ~ ~ _ _
Athletic Field None All F9-Soceer Goals _ _
Athletic Field None All F10-Volleyball Courts 13,628 13,628 17,035
Page 2 of 3
Town of VaiU Vail Recreation District
Borne Engineering Report- Summary of Cost Sharing- Preliminary Draft Dated October 5, 2007
Total Thru Total W/ 25
Location Town Responsibility VRD Responsi b0ity Description 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 Cootingeocy
Athletic Feld None All F 11-Chain Link Fencing 2,796 2,796 3,495
Athletic Field None All F l2-Wood Split Rail Fence 11,648 11,648 14,560
Athletic Field None All F13-Bleachers _ _
Attllehc Field _ _ _ TBD-Assume split TBD- Assume split F 14-Irrigatiq
n System- VRD Responsibi4ity 224
16 16,224 2Q280
yAthlehcPteld TBD-AssutnesptitJ_ _ _ .,, _ ,
.. TBD-Asswnesplit ; ~ _ _
_
_ ,-..._. •- F14.1gigahon,SY?~e!n. TownResponsi6lity _
,_ ~
._
~ _
,
6,224_
1 - . .
:76.225
1~ 20280"i
AthleticFtetd None
~ All
- F15-Miscellaneouslmprovements
~ . _
14,559 . ___
_ -_-_ _
14.559 Yy 1B 199
Nature Center ;All
. -
- Nuns „ G~-Wood Stdin and Trim.
_ _
_ _
_ .
_ .
849
~-
_
849
5,
,..,
7312
flVature Center
~N
t
reCenter All
All -Norte ' ,. ; •
G2-Windmvs
' .
+~
: • •
a
u
NatiseCentes "_}^_
_ All
_ .. __ _>_
_ Noneµ. ._
_ None
_ _
~ ~ G
i-Extenorpoors
G4-Stec SI Roofin
~ `
-' M1
_
~
Nature Center None All GS-Interior 7 242 7 242-_ ~ . ~~ ~9 053 ~
Nature Center Entrance and Town Interior and trail signs G6-Miscellaneous Signage, 5,500 3,786 8,286 10,357
Nature Center
_... _ None
__ All
" G7-Walki and Drivin Paths
n8, 8
5,3 2
5 372
6 715
}N~ture Center;v _ All - m - r Npne ~ y + G8 Wood Gpen RaiLFenerng ` ~ - ~' 8;517
8,517 10;656 ,
Nature Center None All G9-Benches and Tables 3,276 _
3,276 ~ 4,095
Nature Center None All GI0.Timber Stairways _ _
Nature Center None All Gl1-Teepee 1,000 1,000 1,250
Nature Center
..< .None
_.. _. _... All
...
~ (ill-Shade Structure
4
{Gymnasacs y .. Per Lease ... __ -,- -. ... _` ^ .
, Per Lease r.:.._ __ . _
. _ _ Hi Hyitdtng-Sttucture
._.
., p
. _ _ _:. r-°' _ _ _
Gymnastics Per Lease Per Lease ..
.
.
H2-Stucco --~ " ~ • __ ~ "_
Gymnastics Per Lease Per Lease H3-Cedar Siding 2,052 2,052 2,565
Gymnastics Per Lease Per Lease H4-Windows 1,000 1000 1,250
Gymnastics Per Lease ~ Per Lease HS-Exterior Doors ~ - _
Gymnastics
-.---,« Per Lease
__ .__y ... _ Per Lease
- _. .. _ .. _ H6•Buildmg Cano ies! Sunscreens
... 7,247 7247 9,058
Gymnaspos Per Lease 'Per-Lease ~.. H7.LoivSlopeRoofitig ~ ° -
~
Gytnirasucs
~
e'er Lease
Pei 1 ease
~
'H8-Goncrete Walkway and Stairs
~
, ~ _
1 583 1;582 t
. 1977 .
~Gyrnriasucs Per Lease , Pcr i,ease ~ : : H9-Concrete Draut Pan -
~ 5,606 _ ' 5;600 ~ •~ 7.000 ~i
lGynmasttcs _~ ,,;, PeFl.ease t ~- ~ PerLe'ase .. , .~ -.`,H70.1ietartungWalls '
-> Ifi,897 - - _ „_ 16;897 ~.,~23,621 ~.
Gymnastics Per Lease Per Lease HLI-Interior Floor Coverings _ _
Gymnastics Per Lease Per Lease ~ H12-Interior Walls and Ceilings 12,592 12,592 15,740
Gymnastics Per Lease Per Lease Hl3-Interior Doors _ _
Gymnastics Per Lease x
' Per Lease
__ ._. Hl4-Gynmasrum Lightmq 1 125
I "
~Gyinnashcs ', 'Per Lease ~ _
Per Lease . HlS-Restrooms - ? - -
-
'
~
Gymnasbcs
C
u~ . ~ Per Lease , _,~ ~ . ~. ~'
~_- .Per Lease _
a._._ z .' a Hl6•Dance Studto n. _
... _
~,•"
~-~ ~ 17,368 a
~ ~
~ ~ 17;368
~~ 21,710
ryn
ashcs" _-
l _ Per Lease
'
"` Per lease _ H17-CubbresandLockers
_ 1000 2,250 - ~
3,250 ~^~~ 4,062
GynutacHcs :
Per Lease Per Lease
, H]8-Furnace ~
Gymnastics
~ Per Lease ~ Perl,ease
_ H19-R@dtam Heat System
` ~ _ -
Gymitasttes Per Lease : ' .; Per Lease ., ;
- H2O-Miscellaneous Mechanical Improvamerif
';~
>:; 20 000,
`'.
r ri 20,000
~~ '..'S OOO j
~Gyinnashcs.
~ ~Per•L.ea~se v
,
Perl,sase .
, _ H21;Elevator .s ~
~ ~T
.
~
Gymnastics Per Lease Per Lease H22-Gymnastic Equipment 12,000 13,498 25,498 31,873
Gymnastics Per Lease ~ Per Lease
~ FI23-Rubber Floor Mats 9,360 9,360 11,700
Equipment None All ^-Turf and Nordic Equipment 205,504 72,999 278,503 348,129
Egwpment None All Jl-Pickup Trucks and Passenger Vehicles 67,100 71,448 24,877 49,831 213,256 266,570
Equipment None All J2-Dump Truck 56,243 56,243 7Q304
Equipment None All J3-Snowmobile 9,944 9,944 12,430
Equipment None All J4-Trailers 1,500' ~ 1,500 1875
Total Per Borne Report 1,350,828 430,077 391,98D 775,483 96,571 266,762 3,311,702 4,139,627
Total VRDCosts 182,039 183,165 312,041 295,689 81,
598 182,784 1,237,315 1,546,644
_ -_ _ ___ ~ __ _ ~__.~_ _ _ _. __ _TotalTowii Costs 1168,789 245 913 ~ ~ 79.939 . 479 794 - _
14 97A ~ 83.978 2 074987 _
~' 2 592 983
Difference
Page 3 of 3