Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-12-02 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessionr ?.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION AGENDA
VAIL. TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
75 S..Frontage Road`W.
Vail, CO 81657 .
1:40, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2008
NOTE: Times of.items are approximate, subject to change; and
cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council
will consider an item.
No public commentwill'be taken.
1. ITEM/TOPIC: PEC/DRB Update. (15 min.)
2. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: A work session to discuss a prescribed regulation
amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7; Amendment, Vail Town
Code, to Section 12-61-8; Parking and Loading, and Chapter 12-
10-Off Street Parking and Loading; Vail Town Code, to amend
parking. requirements for employee housing units and to clarify the
,parking requirements in the Housing (H) zone district, and setting
forth the details in regard thereto. (30 min.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide staff with policy
direction on. the -town's expectations related to the transportation
needs and parking requirements in the Housing (H) zone district.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Based on.. numerous discussions
on the transportation needs and parking requirements for the
Housing zone district, it is often identified that the flexibility
provided, in the. parking requirements also creates a certain
amount of unintended . confusions ' and ambiguity. There
Community Development Department is requesting that the Town
Council clarifies the Towr,'s expectations related to parking and
transportation in the, Housing zone district.
Currently,. the stated' policy. for parking in the Housing (H) zone
district is,. °ihere isa trallisporta.rion -need generated by residents
living within the Housing zone district that shall be addressed."
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None at this time.
3. Kathleen Halloran ITEM/TOPIC Discussion of Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2008,
an ordinance making suppleme tai appropriations'to the Town of
Vail 2008 bLidget. (20 nrn. )
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide input regarding
the 3rd supplemental of 2008. Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2008,
in preparation for approvi.-ig Ire first reading during 'the evening
session.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE. To be provided in a separate
memo.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town
Council approves Ordinance No. 29, Series -of 2008, upon-first
reading this evening.
4. Matt Mire. ITEM/TOPIC: Discussion bf Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2008, an
Ordinance Amending Title 1, Chapter' 3, Section 2 of, the Vail
Town Code ..by the Adcitibn, of the Definition of the Word
"Publication"; and Setting Forth Details in Regard. Thereto. (10
min.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL; Approve, approve with
modifications, or der;y Crdir ance No. 30, Series of,2008, upon
first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The 2009 budget was passed
second reading -on November 18, 2008. The 2009 budget
eliminates funding for publication in the local papers. Section 4.10
of the Town Charter requires p_,blicatiori of ordinances upon their
introduction and Gdoption. Tt;e Charter does not define what Js
required by "publication In 2007. the Town spent $19,693 for
publication of its ordinances in the Vail Daily,. requiring the Town
Clerk to increase the office advertising budget during the third
supplemental appropriation by an additional $12,000. The Town
Clerk has currently spent 519,492 of her 2008 budget on
publications of ordinances.
'STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve, approve with
modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2008, upon
first reading.
5. George Ruther ITEM/TOPIC: A work sess -_)n to discuss Resolution No: 25, Series
of 2008, a resoutIon amending tie fees assessed for certain
planning &. Environn;enta! Commission, Design Review Board,
and Administrative developrr,ent review applications; and setting
forth details i.ri regard thier?.to. (30 mini
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Community
Development is requesting that the Town Council provides any
input or feedback they may nave on the proposed adjustments to
the review fees
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The "2008 Communitv
Development Department Work' Plan" identifies the task of
evaluating and adjustin j, ;f necessary, the existing fees for certain
development review app:.cationss to more accurately reflect the
cost of.the service prov&-.,d. In.evaluating the application fees, .
staff has focused oly on those application types where it is
believed that the cost of the service provided significantly
outweighs the existing fee charged for the service.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Vail
Town Council provides f =: clack in anticipation of a reading of
Resolution No. 25, Sen,_:s on December 16, 2008
6. ITEM/TOPIC: Information U crate. (15 min.)
7. ITEM/TOPIC: Platters f; a n Manor & Council. (15 min.)
8. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournm ,nt. (3155 P.M.)
NOTE.UPCOMING MEETING S !-ART TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR v'dORK SESSION WILL BEGINAT TBD,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2008 IN THE VA.IL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
November 24, 2008
12:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75S.-Frontage Road -Vail, Colorado, 81657
MEMBERS PRESENT
Michael Kurz .
Sarah Paladino-Robinson
Susie Tjossem
Bill Pierce
Rollie Kjesbo
David Viele
MEMBERS ABSENT
Scott Proper.
Training: 12:00 PM
Town.of.Vail Economic Development Strategic Plan - Kelli McDonald - 30 minutes
Putting the "E" back in the PEC - Functions and Duties of the PEC = Kristen Bertuglia - 30
minutes,
1:00 pm
1.- Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Presentation (Ever Vail) - George Ruther - 30 minutes
30 minutes
2.. A request for a final review of a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant, t6.12-7D-2, .Conditional, Uses,-:
Vail Town Code, to allow for a drive-up facility, located at 2111 North Frontage Road West, Suite
A/Part of Lot 3, Vail Das Schone Filing 3 and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080060)
Applicant: Xpresso Drive-Thru Cafe, represented by Beth Levine
Planner:. Nicole Peterson
ACTION: Approved, with conditions
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: 6-M
1. The applicant shall obtain Design Review Board approval for the exterior changes to
the building and, signage.
2. The proposed signage shall maintain the character of the neighborhood and be
consistent with the architectural scale and bulk of the Xpresso, building, as determined
by the Design Review Board.
3. The applicant shall obtain -the Town Engineer's approval of the final traffic flow plan
including but not limited to proposed pavement markings delineating the, stacking
lane and traffic direction and drive-way widths, in conjunction with the building permit..
4. The applicant shall obtain the Health Inspector's approval in conjunction with the
building permit.
5. The applicant shall obtain the Building Official's.approval:thru an approved building
permit prior to any construction, on- site.
6. Any and all deviations or violations of the adopted conditions herein shall warrant and
cause the re-evaluation of the conditional use permit by the Planning, St Environmental
Commission, pursuant to Chapter 12-16 Conditional.Use Permits.
Nicole Peterson.gave a presentation, per the. Staff memorandum and a power point presentation
as Well.,
Beth Levine, architect, representing the applicant, gave a presentation stating that she and the
applicant have been working diligently with the Town to resolve all the issues. She requested
Page 1
that the Commission not regulate,the hours of operation, as stated in proposed condition #3,
page 5, in the Staff memorandum.
Bill Pierce asked if the applicant planned to provide outdoor seating for walk-up patrons.
Ms. Levine, described the original plan to remove landscaping from the -site, and provide an
outdoor seating area. However, 'she explained the landscaping percentage, required by zoning,
was short --on-site, and therefore to remove landscaping. would require a variance, which the
applicant did not wish to pursue.
Sarah Robinson-Palidino.asked about the loss of parking spaces due to traffic flow.
Beth Levine described that two parking spaces were to be removed, however the parking
requirement is met (163. spaces required and 164 provided on-site).
Michael Kurz asked how long the building was vacant. Ms. Levine guessed it had been not used
as a drive up teller station for approximately 10+ years and was a drive thru ATM in recent years.
Susie Tjossem stated concern about the traffic flow and asked if the stacking lane could be
delineated with a line. Mt., Levine stated that she will work with staff on a proposal to.direct .
traffic per the condition.
Bill Pierce stated that he would like to see outdoor seating on-site and,suggested that the
applicant come back to Staff with a plan to provide the required landscaping in a different area of
the site. He also stated' disagreement with limiting the hours of operation.
20 minutes
3. A request for a final review for a..variance from 12-6E-7, Height, Vail Town Code, pursuant to 12-
17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for a building in excess of 33 feet in, height, located at
2754 South Frontage Road West/Lot B, Stephens Subdivision,'and setting forth details in regard .
thereto. (PEC080066)
Applicant: Lorraine Howenstein, represented by Beth Levine
Planner: Bill Gibson=arren Campbell
ACTION: Approved
MOTION:. Kjesbo SECOND: Viele VOTE: 5-14 (Pierce opposed).
Warren. Campbell gave 'a presentation per the Staff memorandum.
Beth Levine; architect, representing the applicant stated thatthis was an oversight as the
foundation needed to raised one foot above the floodplain.-
Commissioner Pierce, asked for greater clarification on the history of the site.
Mr. Campbell explained that in approximately 2003 or 2004 that FEMA performed a new study of
Gore Creek-and its floodplain and the results placed this lot and the adjacent lots almost
completely within the flood plain. In 2005, the applicant, Staff, and FEMA worked together to
develop an overall grading plan for the affected lots so that they would remain developable and
not negatively affect the floodplain. The overall grading plan was approved by the PEC in July of
2008. , The resulting discrepancy and cause for the variance request today was that the applicant
did not calculate that the finished floor of here design needed to be one foot above the
floodplain:
Page 2
The Commissioners expressed their understanding and support for the request. Commissioner
Pierce stated that he did not seethe hardship.
30 minutes
4. A request for a work session to discuss prescribed regulation amendments, pursuant to Section
1273-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Section 12-61-8, Parking and Loading, and Chapter 12-
10, Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail <Town Code, to.amend parking requirements for
employee housing units and to clarify the parking requirements in the Housing (H) zone district,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080067)
Applicant:. Town of Vail
Planner: George Ruther
ACTION:: Motion to Table-to December 8, 2008
.MOTION: Viele , - SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 6-0-0
George Ruther made a presentation per the'staff memorandum.
Commissioner Pierce said he wants to know how other communities deal with this exact issue.
He felt that flexibility was a benefit, and once it is codified, this benefit goes away. Most
developers don't draw, employee housing. and then ask for relief. He said it would be helpful to
have discussions before things get drawn to discuss how the parking will be dealt with within a
project.
Commissioner Kurz said that there are forces here. Do the parking requirements work? There
are guidelines for each area, where if you are transit oriented development, you have lower
guidelines. Perhaps we could have guidelines that break it down 6ydormitory, one bedroom,
two bedroom, single family etc andbased- on,location and desired occupant. The developer will
provide a-plan for parking,'and if they deviate from general guidelines, they will have to provide
additional amenities like sidewalks, bike parking, etc. We need to let.the developer respond with
a creative method that works for each project. They should also be able to provide shuttles or
some other mechanism to provide transportation to the people who live there. If the parking
comes first, on top of all other requirements, they may decide that's not what they want.
George Ruther asked if it is possible to come up with a parking requirement for a dorm unit.
Commissioner. Kurz responded that per dormitory unit, you cannot have a single requirement
because they have a wide variety.of number of beds. Kurz said general guidelines are good, but
then need to take into account the other factors like transit oriented development.
Commissioner Tjossem asked if this came out of the Town Council discussion on redevelopment
of Timber Ridge. She.said a requirement might allow more measurable development: Isn't this
helping make the housing affordable?
George Ruther said that the Timber Ridge Advisory Committee is the impetus behind this
request. As. a developer, there needs to be clear and predicable expectations, and not just
open-ended interpretation.
Commissioner Viele said he looks at what makes sense and what is required/legal. He agrees
that there needs to be flexibility-in approval, but there has to be a minimumli aximum guideline
that shows a threshold that needs to be met or that the Town considers to be adequate.
Commissioner Kurz said that putting a requirement puts a, limit. on what can be built, and'he said
that developers need the ability to be creative. If we require it at all, it will not bring new
solutions.
Page 3
A.
George Ruther asked if zero parking is an option if alternate means of transportation are
provided.
Commissioner Palladino-said that no, it is not ok because the Town takes responsibility for the,
cars." being somewhere else, like on. the Frontage Road 'at trail head, parking or displaced
elsewhere in town. She said as much as no parking is great, it is not practical. The town is-still
rural and not dense enough, and there are no rental car places in the vicinity to.se.rve as an
alternative means of transportation.
Commissioner Tjossem said that the seasonal workers are changing and are again switching .
from international back to domestic. There are many domestic laborers out of work and they are.
coming here, and like it or not they have cars. We cannot base this amendment on who we are
attracting at a single point in time or who we would like to attract because it keeps changing.
However, proximity to public transportation and alternate means of transportation to a building
would be better to control the' issue.
Commissioner Pierce said. guidelines need to. be provided as a starting point. Chapter.10-of the.
Code provides closely defined requirements, but If its in a different location, the parking .
requirement is less.. He said the Code needs to take into. consideration some units that are a-'
typical. Perhaps need to add requirements for dormitory rooms or number of spaces 'per:pillow"..
He believes we need to have requirements so that people understand what is required from the
start.. Alternate housing opportunities should have their own section.
George Ruther sought to clarify the comments he heard from the PEC: He said transit oriented
development helps to reduce requirements from. other places, such as transportation; etc. He
said he was wondering if there.are times when the transportation' system goes underutilized. He
said there may be opportunities to greater utilize infrastructure, including,-buses, sidewalks, bike
paths, etc.
Commissioner Kurz said that if the town had 24 hour bus service and you could live in the.
village, there could be a reduced need for cars. People however want cars to go other, places:
We cannot ignore that. He said it would be good to take cars off the road with environmental
sustainability in mind.
George-Ruther asked about parking for visitors. He asked if it's ok if visitors to the project do not
have parking. He said this is included in the calculation for parking.
The Commissioners said you need to provide visitor parking.
Commisioner Viele said there needs to be an element of trust within the market. There needs to
be parking provided that the developer will provide on their own.
Commissioner Kjesbo said that each project is different, and with for-sale units, you need more .
parking.
Commissioner Tjossem said that when a business owner has a building we don't want .them to
have the ability to say, no parking. With Timber Ridge, she says the developer needs to
understand what is required.
Commissioner Kjesbo said there needs to be flexibility.
Page 4
George Ruther said that developers. tell the Town that they would like predictability. He said that
is it clear at to distance from services, buses, etc.
Commissioner Kjesbo said that in Solar Vail there was a parking plan that allowed flexibility. He
said there is not enough parking in any building in Town was his perception.
Commissioner Viele said that the Code is the.worst case scenario, and that should be put into
the pro-forma and anything allowed in less is a bonus. He said the question is whether that
requirement should be different in the Housing District.
George Ruther asked if the criteria are good for this type of development (ie Housing -zone
district),. can they be expanded to other districts?
Commissioner Viele said there is a provision in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan that
allows for flexibility from the Town Code. He said there should be flexibility written in.
George Ruther asked if we want all the cars and parking that comes with development, but
perhaps take another method, Pike transportation, etc: Do we want the outcome when we assess
that parking? Should we be looking at other ways to address problem?
Commissioner Kurz asked if a transportation plan is required.
George Rather said that there are aspects of a transportation plan in. each project, but not in
detail. If we rely solely on parking spaces as addressing transportation needs, perhaps we are
not getting results we want.
Commissioner Kurz said that if the units require parking, the developer will put that in the
economic'model. He said that location should help determine what your parking requirements
are.
George Ruther said there. has been a paradigm shift where parking is very valuable but if you
give people walkability, they may not need parking.
Commissioner Kurz said it needs to be in conjunction with traffic flow considerations.
Dominic Mauriello said that parking requirements could be established but then allow for
diversions from that.
Commissioner Kjesbo said that at Middle Creek, they charge for parking. On Timber Ridge there
is a model with how many parking spaces. There is history to use to understand what parking
requirements are.
Commissioner Pierce asked about parking at Timber Ridge
Nina Timm said there are 398 spaces for 198 units, and all are utilized: She said you:cant .
regulate the occupant but you have more people per units at Timber Ridge. Because of
financing, you can limit occupancy but you don't have more than 2 people per unit at Middle
Creek, driving it more than anything.
Page 5 .-
20 minutes
5. Report to the Planning and Environmental Commission of an administrative action approving a.
request for a minor amendment to SDD No. 39, Crossroads, pursuant to Section_ 12-9A-10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for modifications to.-the approved building
plans for Solaris increasing commercial floor area, located at 141 and 943. Meadow Drive/Lot P,
Block 5D, Vail Village Filing -1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080068)
Applicant: Solaris Property Owner, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
Planner: - Warren Campbell .
Warren Campbell gave a presentation including a report on a letter provided by Art Abplanalp,
attorney representing the Vail Village Plaza Condominium Association. As many PEC members
had not seen an administrative action with regard to an SDD the.process was described in.detail.
He added that the applicant, in an attempt to take more time to resolve issues and concerns
raised by the neighbors wished to drop from the administrative action the request to narrowthe
east-west pedestrian connection.
Dominic Mauriello of the Mauriello Planning Group, representative of the applicant, said.that the
applicant has withdrawn the portion. of the application that includes the narrowing of the tunnel.
However, the rest of the application is as it appears in Staff's letter to the PEC.
Commissioner Pierce said that there should not be a time consideration and wondered if the
application should be called-up and reviewed in its entirety.
Commissioner Viele, said that the construction is at a point were this changes approved by Staff
are timely and need to be acted on in the near term or end up costing multiple times more to
construct.
Art Alpanalp, representing the Vail Village Plaza Condominium Association; said that if the PEC
is concerned about any of the issues, the PEC should call it up. The Association is concerned
with the passageway which the Town master plan requires. If the applicant is eliminating
element #3, he and his'clients have no issue with what has been proposed.
Commission Palladino said there is no need to call this up.. She said that the PEC wants to give
Staff the ability to. approve, items that are smaller in scale.- .There is a solution; and any. .
significant changes will be required to come back to the_PEC. Otherwise, she said the PEC
asked for this type of procedural administrative approval, on minor elements.
Commissioners Tjossem, Viele, Kjesbo, and Kurz stated that they did not believe this need to be
called up.
Commissioner Pierce has concern about the southwest corner, with the ability to look through
the arcade on the southwest comer.
After discussion there was no motion made for a call up allowing Staffs administrative action..to
stand as amended on the record.
6. Approval of November 10, 2008 minutes
MOTION: Viele SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 6-0-0
7. Information Update
Reminder of December 2, 2008, joint work session with Town Council in the evening
Page 6
8. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 6-M
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office-hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the.
Town of-Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published November 21, 2008, in the Vail Daily.
Page 7
Y;
1
PROJECT ORIENTATION
MEMBERS PRESENT .
Tom-DuBois.
Mike Dantas
Pete Dunning
Elizabeth Plante
Brian Gillette
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
PUBLIC MEETING
November 19, 2008
1:30 PM
Council. Chambers
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81,657
MEMBERS ABSENT
SITE VISITS
1. Manrco Cashmere, 242 East Meadow Drive .
2. Vail Village Inn, 68 East Meadow Drive
3. Kirschner Residence, 1995 Chamonix Lane, West Unit
PUBLIC HEARING -TOWN. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Mountain Haus Condos DRB080531 / 10 Minutes
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (re-paint)
292 East Meadow Drive/Tract B, Vail Village Filing 1 .
Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominiums, represented by KH Webb Architects
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Plante SECOND: DuBois VOTE: 5-0-0
2. Manrico Cashmere DRB080577 / 10 Minutes
Final review of a minor alteration .(re-paint)
242 E Meadow Drive/ part of Tract B,. Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Manrico Cashmere, represented by Chad Goodman, Kona Designs
ACTION: Tabled to December 3, 2008
MOTION: Dantas SECOND: Plante VOTE: 5-"
1:30pm
2:06pm
3:00pm
Rachel
Rachel
3. Kirschner Residence DRB080542 / 10 Minutes Nicole
Final review of changes to approved plans (overhead power, landscaping, driveway, etc) .
1995 Chamonix Lane, West Unit/Lot 27, Buffehr Creek Subdivision
Applicant: John Kirschner, represented by JL Viele Construction
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Dantas SECOND: DuBois VOTE: 5-0-0
CONDITION(S):
1. The applicant shall paint the trim around the garage door, brown, to match the existing
trim around the windows, prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance.
Page 1
2. The applicant shall paint the light above the garage to match the trim,, or the light shall be
replaced and match the trim.. If the light is to'be replaced a cut sheet of the light shall be
submitted for review and approval by Staff, prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance.
4. Vail Village Inn DRB080559 [10 Minutes Nicole
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (path removal)
68 East Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Vail Village Inn Phase Iff, represented by Anne Bishop
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: DuBois SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 4-0-1 (Dantas recused)
CONDITION(S):
1. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan, including replacement plantings in the. .
walkway removal area and retaining walls on the north and south sides. that match the
existing and/or proposed Solaris retaining walls, within 60.days of this approval "(January 19,
2009 by 5:000m), for Design Review Board approval.
2. The proposed retaining walls' shall be properly constructed, as approved -by the Town .
Engineer, and finished to match the abutting retaining walls on the north and south sides of
the removed walkway. " The finished retaining wall system for the subject property and .
Solaris shall be seamless and in keeping with the character of the Vail Village.
5. Solaris DRB080580 / 25 Minutes Warren
Conceptual review, of changes to approved plans (commercial additions)
143 East Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Michael Suman
Conceptual, no vote
6. Presentation regarding the Lionshead. Redevelopment Master Plan with regard to Ever Vail - 30 minutes
STAFF APPROVALS
Rucksack Building DRBOB0445.
Final approval for changes to the approved plans (elevations)
288 Bridge Street/Lots C, D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Jeffrey Selby, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Architects
Sonnenalp: DRB080497
Final review of a, sign (freestanding "lot full")
20 Vail Road/Lot L; Block 5=E, Vail "Village Filing
Applicant: Sonnenalp
Mountain View Residences. DRB080535
Final review of a sign (building identification)
442 South Frontage Road West/Lot D, Vail Village Filing 5
Applicant: Lunar Vail-, represented by Ron Constien
Charlie's T-Shirts.DRB080539
Final review of a sign:
234 Gore Creek Drive/Lot B, Vail Village Filing 1,
Applicant: Charlie's T-Shirts, represented by Annie Egan
..Rachel
Bill
Warren
Bill
Page 2
Bighorn Condos DRB080541
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping)
4207 Columbine Drive/Lot 19-13, Bighorn Subdivision
Applicant: Bighorn Condos, represented by Diana Donovan
Vail Resorts Ski School/Ticketing DRB080544
Final review of a sign application (ski school, lift tickets, etc)
536 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Kyle Griffith
Park Meadows DRB080553
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping)
1472 Matterhorn Circle/Vail Park Meadows
Applicant: Finn Boyer
Morris Residence DRB080554
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (thermal system)
2945 Booth Creek Drive/Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 11
Applicant: John Morris, represented by Grid Feeders
Vail Cascade Resort DRB080555
Final review of changes to approved plans (revised entry sign)
1300 Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village, SDD #4
Applicant: L-O Westhaven Inc, represented by Rick Pylman
Peterson Residence DRBOB0560
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping)
2972 Bellflower Drive/Lot 14, Block 6, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Ralph Peterson
Children's Snowsports School DRB080561
Final review of a sign
675 Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Lionshead Filing 6
Applicant: Vail Resorts
Holiday Inn DRB080562
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (fire pit, flags)
2211 North Frontage Road/Lots 1, 2, Vail Das Schone Filing 3
Applicant: Holiday Inn, represented by Vanquish Vail
Francoise Residence DRB080563
Final review of an addition (infill deck with living space)
2834 Snowberry Drive/Lot 18A, Block 9, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Reginald Franciose, represented by Sawatch Land Co
Warren
Bill
Warren
Bill
Nicole
Warren
George
Bill
Rachel
Sciotto Residence DRB080564 Bill
Final review of a conceptual review (a/c condensing unit on roof)
380 East Lionshead Circle, Suite 410/1-ot 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Beck Building Co
Page 3
Gerstenberger Residence DRB080565 Rachel
Final review of changes to approved plans (eliminate sloped portion of shed roof)
1320 Greenhill Court, Unit B/Lot 16B, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Applicant: Sawatch Land Co
Eye Pieces DRB080568
Final review of a minor alteration (decorative painting)
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot A & B, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Eye Pieces, represented by Dan Barry
Town of Vail DRB080579
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (windows)
2783 Kinnickinnick Road #4/Lot 8, Block 4, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Town of Vail
Gold Peak Children's Center DRB080581 / 10 Min
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (exterior renovations)
458 Vail Valley Drive/Tract F, Vail Village Filing 7
Applicant: Jeff Babb
Warren
Jeri
Bill
Prudential Colorado Properties DRB080582 Rachel
Final review of a sign (business ID)
228 Bridge Street/ Lot A, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Prudential Colorado Properties, represented by Michael Slevin
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Page 4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: December 2, 2008
SUBJECT: A worksession to -discuss prescribed regulation amendments, pursuant to
Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Section .12-61-8, Parking
and Loading, and Chapter 12-10, Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail
Town Code, to amend.parking requirements for employee housing units
and to clarify-the parking requirements in the Housing (H) zone district,
and setting forth details in regard thereto: (PEC080067)
Applicant: Town of Vail Community Development Department
Planner: George Ruther
I. SUMMARY
The purpose of this memorandum is to inform the Vail Town Council of the
existing regulations--for addressing the parking requirement and transportation
needs of development within the Housing (H) zone district and to share the
Planning & Environmental Commission's initial input on the issues and options
for amending the prescribed regulations. Based upon the input received to. date
and the input shared by the Town Council, staff will be. returning to the Planning
& Environmental Commission on December 8, 2008, with a proposed amending
ordinance. At this time we anticipate first reading with the Town Council to be
held during the evening session of the Town Council meeting on December 16,
2008.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
The applicant, the Town of Vail Community, is requesting a.worksession with the
Vail Town Council to discuss possible prescribed regulation amendments,
pursuant-to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town :Codej, jo Section 12-61-8,
Parking and Loading, and Chapter 12-10, Off Street Parking and Loading, Vail
Town Code, to amend parking requirements ,for employee housing units .and to
clarify the parking requirements in the Housing (H) zone district.
The Town's stated policy for parking in the Housing (H) zone district is,
"there is a transportation need generated by the residents living within
the Housing (H) zone district that shall be addressed.
In addressing that need,: however, presently there are two options an applicant
can choose from to meet the transportation need. The Iwo options are either:
ti
1) adhere to the parking requirements prescribed for residential
development as stated in Chapter 10 of the Zoning Regulations;
or
2) successfully demonstrate . that the transportation- needs of .the
residents is met by means other than providing for the convenient use of
a private automobile.
According to Section 12-61-8, Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, the, parking
requirement for development in the Housing (H) zone-district shall be as follows,'
"Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with chapter 10 of this
title. No . parking or loading area shall be -located within any required
setback area. At the discretion : of the planning and - environmental
commission, variations to the parking standards outlined in chapter 10 of
this title may be approved, during the review of a development plan
subject to a parking management plan: The parking management plan
shall be approved by the planning and environmental. commission and
shall provide fora reduction in the parking-requirements based on a
demonstrated need for fewer parking spaces than chapter 10 of this title
would require. For example, a demonstrated need for a reduction in the
required parking could include:
A. Proximity or availability of altemative modes of transportation
including, but not limited to,- public transit or shuttle.services.
8. A limitation placed in the deed restrictions limiting the number of
cars for each unit: .
C. A demonstrated permanent program including, but not limited to,
rideshare programs, carshare programs, shuttle service, or
staggered work shifts."
To -summarize the regulation, the parking requirement, for development in the
Housing (H) zone district shall comply with the standards set forth. in Chapter. 10
of the Zoning Regulations. Pursuant to Chapter 10, 'a minimum. of 1.5 to 2
parking spaces shall be provided: per dwelling unit.
Conversely, recognizing the importance of ensuring the affordability, of dwelling
units constructed in the, Housing (H) zone district, and. the many unique .
challenges in doing so; the current regulation also grants the Planning and
Environmental Commission discretion when determining the parking requirement
for development within the district. According to the regulation, the Commission
may grant a reduction in the number of required parking spaces if the applicant
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commission that alternate provisions exist .
to meet the transportation needs of the residents living within the District.
There is little doubt that the intent of the current regulation, as written, is to
maintain flexibility through discretion in the application of. the parking
requirements. However, several issues have come up questioning the
2
effectiveness and efficiency of the current regulations (ie, "the probleml. Those
issues include:
• Given the demographics and likely lifestyle choices of
potential residents of the Housing (H) zone district, are 1.5 to
2 parking spaces per dwelling unit the appropriate number of
parking spaces or is that too many spaces?
• Does the current regulation clearly state the Town's
development objectives and expectations for development in
the Housing H) zone district?
• Does the current regulation provide predictability for an
applicant in the imposition of the parking requirements or
does it unintentionally create ambiguity and confusion for
applicants? Is it the most efficient way to address the
situation?
• Are there additional issues (traffic congestion, traffic flow,
public transit capacity, environmental, distribution of
population, availability of public parking, etc.) that can be
addressed with amendments to the parking requirements for
the Housing (H) zone district?
DISCUSSION ISSUES
The Community Development Department has identified a number of issues
which should be discussed prior to drafting an amendment to the existing
regulation. They include:
Should affordability (economic) have a greater priority than livability and
assuring that transportation needs are met?
2. Should the residential parking standards be amended to include a
provision for providing parking spaces on a per pillow basis in addition to
a per dwelling unit basis?
3. How should the parking needs of visitors be addressed?
4. Should any amended parking standards be expanded to all employee
housing units or should they only remain applicable to development within
the Housing (H) zone district?
5. Should quantifiable standards be created to better determine when
reductions to the requirements can be granted (ie, distance to public
transit stop, availability of sidewalks and bike paths, proximity to
commercial centers, etc.)?
6. Should the regulations be the same for rental projects and for-sale
projects? What about dormitory/studio units versus one, two & three
bedroom units?
3
7. Should public, transit, bicycle path, sidewalk improvements, etc. be
required in ..lieu when granting relief from the prescribed parking
requirements?
8. How should.the issue of "displaced' vehicle parking be addressed? .
9. It has been suggested that a parking requirement of one space per four
bedroom dormitory-unit be established (i.e.; 0.25 space/pillow). Is that a
reasonable . requirement given likely demographic of the residents
choosing to live in a dormitory unit?
10. Others?
IV. PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION INPUT
On Monday, November. 24, 2008, . the, Tow n of Vail Community Development
Department held a workses'sion. with _-the Planning and Environmental
Commission (PEC), to. discuss possible.. amendments to the transportation and
parking requirements. Following is a, brief overview of -the key points the PEC
identified related to the parking and transportation needs of employee housing
residents.
1. Residents have transportation needs.
a. Irregardless. of any parking provided residents. have a need to, get
from their home to work; the grocery store, etc. These..needs must be
addressed by the development.
i. Sidewalks and bike paths;
ii. Proximity to bus stops;
iii. Parking spaces; and
iv. Location of the development..
b. If transportation , needs are not addressed by development the Town
will be . forced to address the increased' transportation needs
generated.
2. The targeted-.demographics of a development will dictate the parking and
transportation needs of the residents.
a.,. Recognize that different housing types have different target markets
with different needs
i. Flexibility may be allowed based on the product being
developed.
b.._ Establish guidelines, based on. the specific market demand for what
may be the best mix of parking and transportation provided.
3. Establish minimum guidelines.
a. Recognizing that certain employee housing types do not function like
a more typical dwelling unit, it may be appropriate to_ assess parking
requirements based on bedroom .count and not unit count.
i. Seasonal rentals may require 0.25 parking spaces per
bedroom.
ii. Owner-occupied units may require 1 parking space per,
4
bedroom or 1.5 parking spaces per unit.
iii." No parking is not acceptable based on current transportation
options and transportation paradigms..
b. Can-not create parking regulations based on who is living in units.
L Need to establish a flexible system based on specific criteria.
1. Proximity to jobs
2. Proximity to services
I Proximity to existing public transit
4. Unaccounted for Vehicles and Guest Parking must be-addressed.
'a. Provide plan for resident's vehicles not provided a parking space.
b. Provide`plan for short-term and long-term guest parking spaces.
c. Town can not be left holding the bag.
L A management plan that is "trustworthy" must be provided and :
approved.
5. Other community examples
5
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Stan Zemler, Judy Camp, Kathleen Halloran
DATE: . November 25, 2008
SUBJECT: 2008 Supplemental Appropriation
On Tuesday evening,. you will be asked to approve the third supplemental of 2008 upon first
reading. The following information is included in you packet:
- Third Supplemental Appropriation Request - Detail
- Statements, of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - 2007; Actual
Compared with Amended Budget and 2008 including the Third Supplemental Appropriation
- Ordinance No. 29
General Fund
Based on actual results through November, construction permit fee revenue has been adjusted by .
an. increase of $715;000. However, due to market conditions in 2008, investment income has
been decreased by $90,000.
Council previously approved. a $550,000 transfer of General Fund dollars to the Vail Local.
Marketing District (VLMD) to be used toward winter marketing. This supplemental appropriates
the money so payment can be made to the VLMD.
Heavy Equipment, charges of $147,000 represent the allocation of cost -from the Heavy
Equipment Fund (HEF) to the General Fund for fleet maintenance.
The deployment of the Northwest Incident Management Team (IMT) to Assist with the
Democratic National Convention this fall has resulted in a reimbursement of $13,627 which is
offset by internal costs of $1,258 and a pass-through to other agencies of $12,369. .
Other expenditures offset by revenue include $1,800 of security / traffic .,control that was
reimbursed to, the town from the Farmers' Market and $30,000 of Food Drive donations offset by
the food purchased at City Market for that program.
Uniform expenditure of $60,000 was originally budgeted in 2009, with an offset of $50,000 in
sponsorship from Volvo. The coats will be received in 2008 and therefore the expenditure should
be reflected in 2008. The 2009 budgeted amount will not be spent.
Ongoing litigation will need additional funding of app, uAimately $10,000.
Capital Proiects Fund
Construction Use Tax has been increased by $82,000 (for a total of $582,000) based on actual
receipts year-to-date.
1
f?
On-going work toward the redevelopment of Timber Ridge will require additional funds of
approximately $35,000.
Streetscape funds of $50,000 are being transferred to the Art in Public Places (AIPP) for use
toward the new ?..?.?nee of Meadow Drive.
Adjustments that were made during the second supplemental to debt service payments are being
reversed. These adjustments reflected the savings to principal and interest from a refinancing of
the town's. 1998A bonds. However, due to market uncertainty the town has not finalized the
transaction. The town will not refinance the bonds unless the planned savings can be realized.
Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund (RETT)
The town's Art in Public Places (AIPP) program sells manhole covers and jewelry to supplement
their annual budget.' The AIPP budget has been increased to reflect the net income of $7,518.
$50,000 for the new entrance to Meadow Drive is funded from the capital streetscape project.
Conference Center Fund
Revenue from earnings on investments has been decreased by $200,000 to an amended $225,000
to reflect lower interest rates than originally projected.
Heavv Eauinment Fund
As mentioned above, the General. Fund operating budget will be charged for overall fleet .
expenditures totaling $147,000. Again, investment income is projected at a decrease of $20,000
from the original budget.
Debt Service Fund
As mentioned, above, the 1998A bonds will not be refinanced unless the planned savings in
principal and interest can be realized. This adjustment reverses the savings that were budgeted
during the second supplemental.
2
Proposed Supplemental Appropriations and Budget Adjustments #3 of 2008
Revenue Expenditure.
Increase Increase
Description (Decrease) (Decreasef Reason
GeneraFFund-
Construction Permit Revenue 715,000 Basedon current'overage
Investment Income (90,000) Rate of returmhas dramatically dropped during 2008; originally budgeted at a rate of 4.5% and currently earning 2.37%
Winter Marketing Campaign 550,000 Nov 4th, Council determined this s/b paid from the General Fund surplus
Heavy Equipment Charges 147,000 . Accounting adjustment to allocate cost to the departments; offset by revenue in Heavy Equipment Fund
Democratic Nafl Convention 13,627 Reimbursement from state for per diem / mileage
Democratic Nat'l Convention 1;258 TOV staff expenses (per diem / mileage) - TOV donated staff time
Democratic Nat'I Convention 12,369 Reimburse other NW Incident Mgmgt Team expenses (other municipalities that were deployed to the DNC)
Shared Cost / Reimbursement 1,800 Farmer's Market reimbursed TOV for overage in security services
Security for Farmer's Market 1,800 TOV granted $6,000 of council contributions to the Farmer's Market for traffic/security; the cost came in more than budget
Food Drive - Citizen Donations 30,000 Donations collected for annual food drive
Food Drive - Expense 30,000 Purchase of,food from City Market
Uniforms 60,000 Public Works coats - budgeted in 2009, but we are now ordering to receive in 2008; offset by Volvo sponsoring (2009 revenue)
Professional Fees 10,000 Ongoing litigation
Subtotal General Fdnd 670,427 812,427
Capital Projects Fund
Construction Use Tax 82,000 Based on current overage
Streetscape (50,000) Transfer funds to Public Art for Meadow Drive entrance
Timber Ridge Legal / Zoning 35,000 On-going work toward redevelopment and request for qualifications
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 35,000 Reverse budget adjustment done at 2nd supplemental for the refinancing of town's 1998A bonds
Subtotal Capital Projects Fund 82,000 20,000
RETT Projects Fund
Manhole cover revenue 10,626 Revenue from sales of manhole covers and jewelry
Manhole cover expenses 3,108 Year-to-date expenses
Public Art 7,518 Net proceeds•from Manhole cover sales go toward AIPP
Public An 50,000 Transfer of funds from streetscape account to pay for Meadow Drive entrance
Subtotal RETT Projects Fund 10,626 60,626
Conference Center Fund
Investment Income (200,000) Rate of return has dramatically dropped during 2008; originally budgeted at a rate of 4.5% and currently earning 2.37%
Subtotal Conference Center Fund (200,000) -
Heavy Equipment Fund
Heavy Equipment Operating Revenue 147,000 Allocation of charges back to each department (see General Fund expenditure above)
Investment Income (20,000) Rate of return has dramatically. dropped during 2008; originally budgeted at a rate of 4.5% and currently earning 2.37%
Subtotal Heavy Equipment fund 127,000 _
Debt Service Fund
Transfer from Capital Projects Fund 35;000 Reverse budget adjustment done at 2nd supplemental for the refinancing of town's 1998A bonds,
Principal (45,000) Reverse budget adjustment donee 2nd supplemental: for the refinancing of town's 1998A bonds
Interest 80,000 _ Reverse budget adjustment done at Ind supplemental for the refinancing of town's 1998A bonds
Subtotal Debt Service Fund 35,000 35,000
Total All Funds 725;053 928,053
'4,
Supp 3 of 2008, 3
1112512008 3:59 PM
P'
3rd Supplemental of 2008
First Reading
. TOWN OF VAIL 2008 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
GENERAL FUND
Budget Ammended 3rd
1 2008 2008 1 Supplemental
Revenue
Local Taxes:
Sales Tax Split b/t Gen'I Fund & Capital Fund
Sales Tax
Property and Ownership
Ski I.A.Tax
Franchise Fees, Penalties, and Other Taxes
Licenses & Permits
Intergovernmental Revenue
Transportation Centers
Charges for Services
Fines & Forfeitures
Eamings.on Investments
Rental Revenue
Miscellaneous and Proiect Reimbursements
Total Revenue
Expenditures
Salaries
Benefits
Subtotal Compensation and Benefits
Contributions, Special Events and Econ Day
All Other Operating Expenses - _
Heavy Equipment Operating Charges
Heavy Equipment Replacement Charges
Dispatch Services -
Total Expenditures
Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures
Transfer to Capital Projects Fund . .
Transfer to Vail Local Marketing District
Net Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
I
60/40 1 60/40
$ 11,640,000 1 $ 11,640,000
3,843,500 1 4,293,500
3,123, 852.1 3,123, 852
826,110 1 926,110
2,353,950 1 - 2,786,950.
1,366,800 1 1,748,660
3,736,380 1 5,111;880
817,135 767;135
215,000 259,0001
675,000 675,0001
763,000 797,400
70,000 1 111,357
29,430,727 1 32,240,844 1
I
13,073,428 I
.13,371,331
4,512,762 4,519,262
17,586,190 17.890,593
1
1,394,101 1,399,706 1
7,095,455 7,371,5181
2,093,150 2,100,6501
629,643 631,026
535,657 535,657 ,
29,334,196 29,929,150
1
96,531 1 2,311,694
I
(441,000)1
1
96,531 1,870,694
I
14,686,181 19,834,717 1
I
$ 14,782,712 $. 21,705,411
715,000
13,627
I
(90,000)1
1
31,800 1
670,427 1
115,427
147,000
262,4271
1
408,000 I,
I
Proposed
Ammended
2008
60/40
$ 11,640,000
4,293,500
3,123,852 ,
926,110
3,501,950
1,762,287
5,111,880
767,135
259,000
585,000
797,400
.143,157
32,911,271
13,371,331
4,519.262
17,890,593
1,399,706
7,486,945
2,247,650.
631,026
535,657
30,191,577_
2,719,694
' 1 (441,000)
(550,000) (550,000)
1,728,694
I
19,834,717
$ 21,563,411.
4
3rd Supplemental of 2008
, . First Reading
TOWN OF VAIL 2008 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
1
Proposed
Budget Ammended 3rd Ammended
2008 1 2008 Supplemental 2008
Revenue
Sales Tax $ 7,760,000 $ 71760,000 $ 7,760,000
Use Tax - 500.000 82,000 582,000
Federal Grant Revenue 815,577 815,577 815,577
Lease Revenue 187,800 187,800 187,800
Proiect Reimbursement - 1,001,510 1,001,510
Eagle Counter. Grant Revenue - 317,000 317,000
Employee Housing Fee-in-Lieu - 418,000 418,000
Earnings on Investments and Other - 10.850 195,043 195 043
Total Revenue 8,774,227 11,194,930 82,000 11,276,930
a enditures
ILand Purchases
jAltair Unit - 178,066 178,066
(Gore Range Units 2E & 3W
1 599,452 599,452
Equipment Purchases
Document Imaging 350,000 350,000 1 350,000
(Software& Hardware Upgrades 43,000 1 43,000 1 43,000
Comm Day Interactive Permit software - 1 21,838 21,838
Software Licensing 8,500 8,500 8,500
Network.upprades 32,000 43,478 43,478
Website & E-commerce 12,000 32,000 1 32,000
I06_Mpute?r Aided Dispatch (CAD) / RMS Proiect 43,000 57,640 1 57,640
1Parking Equipment. - 52,985 52,985
1 Patrol Car Video Cameras 1 8,000 1 8,000 8,000
IJail /Municipal Bldg Video System Upgrade 1 23,000 1 23,000 23,000
Fire Truck Rdbuild/Refurbish 1 520,000 1 - -
IRadio amplification in parking structures I - 1 50,000 50,000
Heavy Equipment new capital I - 1 3,400 3,400
Generator- •. I - 1 250,000 250,000
(Office Equipment . 1 14,6351 14,635 .14,635
1Replace Buses I - 3,840.297 1 3,840,297
Radio replacement (public works, public safety) 495,500 545,500 1 545,500
Vehicle-Expansion - 61411 1 61,411
Subtotal Equipment Purchases 1,549,635 5,405,684 I 5,405.684
Capital Maintenance I I I I
Bus Sheker Replacement 1 .10,000 1 79.354 1 I 79,354
Capital Street Maintenance 1 1,625,000 1 1,702,280 1,702,280
Parking Structure Improvements 1 935,000 1 1,163,216 1,163,216
General Facility Improvements 1 400,000 1 568,817 568,817
Data Center - 35,500 I 35,500
Flammable storage / Mag Chloride - 1 24,000 1 24.000
Subtotal Capital Maintenance 2,970,0001
1 3,573,167
1 - 1
1 3,573,167
I
Street Reconstruction 1
Neighborhood Road Reconstruction _ 150,000 150,000 1 150,000
Neighborhood Bridge Reconstruction 75,000 75,000 75,000
Sul ! :1 Street Reconstruction _ 1 225,000 225,000 - 225.000
_. Buildings & Improvements
Fire infrastructure improvements 250,000 1 329,229. 329,229
1 Fiber Optics in Buildings 15,000 1 30,000 1 30,000
Variable Messa a Si ns / Wain-Finding Imor 30,000 36,416 1 1 36;416
Donovan Park Pavilion - 13,000 I 13.000
Subtotal Bldgs / Improvements 1 295,000 1 408,645 - I - 408,645
i
3rd Supplemental of Me
First Reading
TOWN OF VAIL 2008 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN-FUND BALANCE
i
1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
I I
Proposed .
Budget Ammended - 3rd t Ammended
2008 2008 Supplemental) 2008
Streetscape Projects j
Manor Vail Street Plan I .. - I 100,000 I 100,000
West Meadow Drive 1 1,720,0001 1,720,000 1,720.000
East Meadow Drive-Streetscape Heat I - 165,000 165,000
Village Streetscape I - 1.013,761 (50.000)1 963,761
Subtotal Stisetscape Projects
I - 1,720.000 2,998,761 1 (50,000)1 2,948,761
Housing Program I 1
I Buy-Down Program 100,000 - I _
Atkin Creek Employee Housing Unit I - I 7,350 1 7,350
(Timber Ridge Debt Service Guarantee I - 1 925,000 1 925,000
Timber Ridge Legal /Zoning - 28.927 1 35.000 63.927
Subtotal Housing Program 100,000 1 961,277 1. 35,000 996,277
LionsHead Redevelopment I I
LionsHead Improvements - 1 32,242 1 32.242
Subtotal LionsHead Redevelopment -
I 32,242 1 32,242
_
Other Improvements I
Property Tax Increment - Reserved - 441.000 441,000
ITOV Strategic Planning Nail 2020)
Housing Strategic Plan 25,341 I l 25,341
West Vail Area Plan I - 22,732 i 22,732
Chamonix Area Plan - I 130.545 130,545
I1-70 Fiber Proiect _ - I 909,1281 909,128
IStreet. Light Improvement Program I 75,0001 75,0001 75,000
11-70 Noise 250,0001 1,079,282 1 1,079,282
I LH Parking Structure Redevelopment - 1 64,857 1 64,857
Bio-Mass Study _ - I 50,000 I 50,000
Underground Utility Improvements - 1 212,7831 212,783
E.. Vail Radio Tower 1 5.000 5.000 1 5.000
Subtotal Other Improvements
I 1 330,000
I 3.015.6681 - 3,015.668
_
Total before Financing I
1 7,189,6351
17,397,962 1
'
(15,000)
17,382,962
Transfer for Debt Service I
(2,321,825) I
(2,286,825) (35,000) (2,321,825)
Transfer from Dispatch )
75,000 75,000
Transfer from General Fund 1 441.0001 1 441.000
Total Financing (2,321,825)1
I (1,770,825)1 (35,000)1 - (1,805,825)
Total Expenditures
9,511.4601 I
19,168.787 1 I
20,0001
19,188,787
Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures (737,233) 1 (7,973,857)1 ' (7,911,857)
Bea inninq Fund Balance 754,153 I 10,154,128 1 10,154,128
Ending Fund Balance $ 16,920 1 $ 2,180.271 1 I $ 2,242,271
6
P
TOWN-OF VAIL 2008 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND
1
Proposed
REVENUE
Real Estate Transfer Tax
Grant Revenue
Golf Course Lease
Lottery Revenue
Project Reimbursements
Eatninas on Investments and Other
Budget Ammended
2008 2008
1 $ 8,230,000 1 $ 7,230,000
151,858
126,708 126,708
20,000 20,000
6,000
200,000 308,330
Recreation Amenity Fees 125,000 125,000
Total Revenue 1 8,701,708 7,967,896 1
I I
EXPENDITURES
Annual Maintenance
.3rd I Ammended
Supplemental 1 2008
. I.
$ 7,230,000
151,858
126,708
20,000
6,000
10,626 318,956
125,000
10,626 7,978,522
RETT Management Fee (to Gen'I Fund) 1 411,500 1 361,500 1 361,500
Park, Path & Landscape Maintenance 1,253,900 1 1,311,066 1 1 1,311,066
Rec. Path Capital Maintenance 222.789 1 384.262 1 384,262
Alpine Garden Suooort 70,000 90,000 90,000
Tree Maintenance 1 60,000 115,931 1 115,931
Forest Health Manaqement 1 360,000 531,808 1 531,8081
StreefFumiture Replacement 1 20,000 26,143 1 26,1431
Black Gore Creek. Sand Mitigation I 100.000 1 184.000 1 184,0001
Subtotal Maintenance 1
_ 2,498,189 1
I 3,004,710 1 - 3,004.7101
1
.
Recreation Pa#dTrail Development 1
Katsos Ranch Path , - 346,887 1 346,887 1
Cascade Bike Path - 6,977 6,977
TmberRidge-Buffshr Crk Rd Path I - 653,700 653,700
Streamwalk & Safety Imorovemetns 1 225,000 225.000 1 225,000
Trailhead Development / Improvement 1 22,100 33,250 1 1 33,250
Meadow Drive Streetscaos 1,250,000 1,023,000 1 1 1,023,000
Frontage_ Road Bike Lanes /Trails 1.275.000 1,275,000 1 1 1,275,000
Subtotal Pathways I
I 2,772,100 I
I 3,563,814 - I 3,563,814
I
Capital Maintenance
ADA Compliance w/ VRD - 100,849 1 1 100,849
VRD Agreements - Legal Counsel 50,000 - -
Raw Water Project / Irrigation Control I - I 9.927 9,927
Stream Tract Incursion Survev 1 30,000 1 64,881 64.881
Big Horn Park - I - -
Plavground Safetv / Red Sandstone 1 425,000 465,037 465.037
Retrofit Park Restrooms-3 seasons I - 78,659 1 78,659
Park / Plavrouiid Capital Maintenance 1 105,000 125.229 1 125,229
Landscape Medians : - 1 570,000 1 570,000
Turf TODdresser - I - I -
Bear Proof Containers - 5,578 5,578
Sibert Circle 1 323,230 1 323,230
Ford Amohitheater Renovations - - -
Greenhouse - 100,0001 100.000
Dobson Ice Arena 77,200 98,907 1 98,907
Gvmnastics Center = 1 29,611 1 29,611
Ford Park / Tennis Center Improvements 62.000 1 78.800 1 78.800
Subtotal Capital Maintenance
- - 749,200 1
I 2,050,708 1 2,050,708
I
Art in Public Places (AIPP)
Public Art 1 75,000 1 318,998 1 50,000 368,998
Project Management 62,167 1 62:167 1 . 10,626 1 '72.793
Subtotal AIPP
I 137,167 1 381,165 1 80,528 I 441,791 _
Park Development
Donovan Park - 45,043 1 1 45,043
While Water Park - I 48.325 1 1 , 48.325
7
3rd Supplemental of 2008
First Reading
?. 3rd Supplemental of 2008
First Reading
TOWN OF VAIL 2008 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND
•. I I I
I
Proposed
Budget I Ammended 3rd I Amended
2008 2008 Supplemental 2008
LionsHead.Park i 928,0001 1,067,000 1,0671000
Skate Park - 65,000 63,000'
Kavek Take-out - 10,000 10,000
-
Ford Park Master Plan-Intor'oveme its 1.500.000 ( 1,581 `340 1,581,340
Subtotal Park Development 2,428,000
I 2,816,708 2,816,708
Recreation Master Planning - 79,543 79,543
Environmental Sustainability 250,000 309,711 309,711
OoenSDace Acduisition - 551,019 551,019
Total Expenditures 8,834,656
i
I 12,757,378 60,626 12,818,004
Revenue Over (Under) ExpendiWres .
I (132,948)1
I (4,789,482) .. (4,839,482)
Beainninq Fund Balance 1 6,953,621
I 11,769,273
I 1 11,769,273
I
Ending Fund Balance 1 $ -61820,673 $ 6,979,791 1 1 $ 6.929.791
8
?
TOWN•OF VAIL 2008 I I
BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUE,. EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN-FUND BALANCE
CONFERENCE CENTER FUND
I I I
Proposed
2008 3rd Ammended
Buddet Supplemental 1. 2008
Revenue
'. Taxes
Sales Tax - -
Public Accomodations Tax 9 - -
Penalties and Interest on Delinquent Taxes
Subtotal Taxes - - -
Other
Eamings`on Investments 425,0001 (200,000)1 225,000
Total Revenue 425,000 1 (200,000)1 225,000
Expenditures - General Government
Management Fee
General Supplies and meetings - -
Capital Outlay - -
Total Expenditures - - -
Revenue Over (Under) Expenditum 425,000 1
' I 1 225,000
I •
Beginning Fund Balance 8,921,901 1 9,046,283
Ending Fund Balance $ 9,346,901 1 $ 9;271,283 I_
3rd Supplemental of 1068,
First Reading
9
r
TOWN OF VAIL 2008 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND
Proposed
Budget Ammended 3rd ' I"Ammended
2008 2008 Supplemental 1 2008
Revenue
Town of Vail Interagency Charge $ 2,795;945 $ 2,804,828 1 $ 147,0001 $ 2,951,828
Insurance.ReimbursementsA Other 38,800 59,8571 59,857
Earnings on Investments - 65,000 65,000 1 (201000) 45,000
Eciuipment.Sales and Trade-ins 133,530 133:530 133.530
Total Revenue 3,033,275 3,063,215 127,000 3,190,215
Expenditures
Salaries & Benefits': 970,593 970.593 970,593
Operating; Maintenance & Contracts 1- 1,180,450 1 1,413,721 1 1,413,721
Capital Outlay 686,3001 923,456 923,456
Total Expenditures 2,837,343 1
1 3,307,770 3,307,770
I
Revenue Over.(Under) Expenditures 195,932 (244,555) 127,000 (117,555)
winning Fund Balance 1,473,250
I 1,734,787 1,734,787
I
Ending Fund Balance $ 1,669,1821 $ 1,490,232 1$ 1,617,232
10
3rd Supplemental of 2008
First Reading
3rd Supplemental of 2008 ,
First Reading
TOWN, OF VAIL 2008 BUDGET
SUMMARY OF REVENU E, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES -IN FUND. BALANCE
DEBT SERVIC E FUND
Proposed
Budget Ammended 3rd I Ammended
2008 2008 Supplemental = 2008.
Revenue..
Transfer from Caoital Proiects Fund $ 2,321,825 $ 2,286,825 35,000 $ 2,321,825 -
Earnings. on Investments.
Total Revenue 2,321;825 2,286,825 ' 35.000 2,321,825
Expenditures.
Princioal 1,890,000 1,935,000 (45,000) 1,890,000
lnterest.Exoense 432,396 352,396 80,000 432,396
Fiscal Agent Fees 2,500 2,500 _ 2,500
Total Expenditures 2,324,896 2,289,896 35,000 2,324,896
Revenue_Over(Under)Expenditures (3,071) (3,071) - (3,071)
Beginning Fund Balance 247,154 252,710 252,710
Ending Fund Balance $ 244,083 $ 249,639 $ 249,639
11
ORDINANCE NO. 29
SERIES OF 2008
AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS TO THE;TOWN OF VAIL
GENERAL FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND,
AND DEBT SERVICE' FUND OF THE 2008 BUDGET FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, .
COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID APPROPRIATIONS AS
SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 2008 which could not have
been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No.
29, Series of 2007, adopting the 2008 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado;
and,
WHEREAS, the Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are
available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in
accordance with'Section 9.10(a).of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and,
WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make
certain supplemental appropriations and budget adjustments as set forth herein.
NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE-TOWN COUNCIL OF THE' TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO that:
1. Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town
Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations and budget adjustments for the
2008 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure or
(reduction) of said appropriations as follows:
General Fund $ 812,427
Capital Projects Fund 20,000
Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 60,626
Debt Service Fund .35.000
Total $ 928,053
2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance iS for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the. remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each
part; section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Ordinance, No. 29, Series of 2008
s
i
3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines,. and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health,. safety, and welfare of the town of Vail and the inhabitants
thereof.
4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty
imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced,
nor any other-action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith
are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON
FIRST READING this 2nd day of December, 2008, and a public hearing shall be held on this
Ordinance on the 16th day of December, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Vail, Colorado, in -the Municipal Building of the town.
Dick Cleveland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
Ordinance No. 29, Series of 2008
?Pr
MEMORANDUM
To: Town Council
From: Matt Mire, Town. Attorney
Subject: Ordinance 30, Series 2008; Publication of Ordinances
Date: 11/24/2008
This memorandum . addresses the Town Council's options
regarding the.publication of ordinances as a result of eliminating, the funding for
publishing ordinances in full in the newspaper as part of the approval of the 2009
budget.
I. Purpose
Ordinance No. 30, Series 2008, has a single purpose: to._ .
eliminate the use of the newspaper for the publication of Town of Vail
ordinances in their entirety.
Accordingly; -if the Town Council (the "Council") wishes to
continue to publish ordinances in the newspaper .(either as the sole method of
publication, or in addition to any other method of publication, including the
internet) then Ordinance No. 30 should NOT be adopted,' and a supplemental,
appropriation should be approved to cover the 2009 costs associated with
publishing ordinances in full in the newspaper.
II. Background
The Town Charter (the "Charter"), which was approved at an
election in 1972, provides in pertinent part:
(a) The ordinance shall be introduced at any regular meeting of
the council by any member thereof.
(b), The ordinance shall be read in full, or in cases where copies of
the ordinance are available to the council and are or have been made
available to the public, said ordinance may be read by title only.
(c) After the first reading of the ordinance, 'the same shall be
approved with or without amendment or rejected by a vote of the council.
(d) If the ordinance is approved on first reading. it shall be
published once in full unless otherwise provided herein. The council shall
set a day, hour; and place at.which council shall hold.a public hearing on
the ordinance and notice of said day, hour, and place shall be included in
the first publication.
(e) The ordinance shall be introduced at council a second time, at
a meeting not earlier than seven (7) davs.after first publication. 'for final
approval, rejection, or other action as may be taken by vote of the pouncil. .
(f) Except, as otherwise provided herein, an ordinance, if amended
subsequent to its last publication, shall be bublished in full after final
passage; but if not amended, it shall be published either by title or in full
as the council may determine.
(g) Whenever an ordinance shall be published by reference or by
title. the publication shall contain a summarv of the subiect matter of said
ordinance- and shall contain a notice to the public that copies of the
proposed ordinance are available at the off ce of the town. clerk. The-
publication .
publication of any ordinance by reference or by title as provided herein,
must set forth in full any penalty clause contained in said ordinance.
As set forth above, the publication of an ordinance both at its introduction
and after its adoption is a legal prerequisite to the validity of any ordinance
adopted by the Council. Although the 'word is not defined for purposes of the
Charter, the Town of Vail has always interpreted the word "Publish"' or
"Publication" to mean publication in a newspaper and has historically published
the full text all of its ordinances in the newspaper as its method of Charter
compliance.
Previous Town Councils have been advised that in order to comply with
the above-referenced Charter, provision and to avoid the process of publishing its
ordinances in the newspaper, the Town would have to amend the Charter_ via a
general election. However, the 1aw in' Colorado. actually allows the Town to
define the word "Publish" or "Publication" by ordinance and without a general
election.
III. Recommendations
Since the publication of an ordinance is a legal requirement to its
validity, it is 'not advisable to create additional procedural hurdles to an ordinance
becoming effective. SO, AGAIN, IF THE COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO
CONTINUE TO PUBLISH. ORDINANCES IN THE NEWSPAPER, DO NOT
PASS ORDINANCE 30.
2
P",
The following options are available to the Town Council:
OPTION 1 - CONTINUE TO PUBLISH ORDINANCES
ONLY IN THE NEWSPAPER
If you choose this option, do NOT pass Ordinance 30, Series 2008.
OPTION 2--, CONTINUE TO PUBLISH ORDINANCES IN
THE NEWSPAPER, AND ON THE TOWN WEBSITE (AND ANY
OTHER WEBSITE(S))
If you choose this option, do NOT pass Ordinance 30, Series 2008.
Passing this ordinance would only create additional procedural pitfalls in
the adoption of any ordinance, which could render the ordinance invalid.
OPTION 3 - STOP PUBLISHING . ORDINANCES .IN t ttr.
NEWSPAPER
If you choose. this option, PASS Ordinance 30 and define
"Publication" in the, manner you feel is appropriate (other than
publication in the newspaper). Keep in mind, however, the'.way you
choose to define the word "Publish" or "Publication" dictates the legal
process the Town must comply with to make the ordinance valid.
If you choose option 3 and decide to pass Ordinance 30, the
following definitions of "Publish" or "Publication" are provided for your
consideration:
1) Define "Publish" or "Publication" as publishing on the Town's
website onlv. (this is the option reflected in the current draft
ordinance)
a. This is the recommendation of the Town Attorney
because the Town can control the publication of all
ordinances in compliance with the Town Charter.
NOTE: We have been successfully publishing all
ordinances and resolutions on the Town's web site
since directed top do so by the Town Council on June
of 2008.
b. Even though the definition would only require
publication on the website, the Town could also choose
to publish or post a legal notice regarding the
3
ordinance, in the paper or in any place in Town without
making it a statutory requirement.
2) Define "Publish" or "Publication" as physically posting in
Town in one (1) place or in multiple. places only
a. This is the method used by Avon.
b. This method is only recommended in addition to
publication' on the website as described below; or as a:
backup method to be available if the. internet is down
for any extended period of time.
3) Define "Publish" or "Publication"-. as a combination .of the
posting on the website and/or physically posting'in Town
4) Define "Publish" or "Publication'.' in' any manner deemed
appropriate-by Council'that has not yet been proposed by, staff
4
ORDINANCE NO. 30
SERIES 2008
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 2 OF THE VAIL TOWN CODE
BY THE ADDITION: OF THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD-"PUBLICATION"; AND SETTING
FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado (the-'Town"),
is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and .existing under' laws of the State of
Colorado and the Town Charter (the "Charter"); and
WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town. (the "Council") have been .
duly elected and qualified; and
WHEREAS, Section 4.10 of the Charter requires publication of ordinances upon their
introduction and adoption; and
WHEREAS, the Charter does not define what is required by "publication;" and .
WHEREAS, the Council understands that more and' more. citizens, are. receiving
information through the World Wide Web than through traditional newspapers; and
WHEREAS, the provisions of this ordinance provide for the greatest dissemination of
information to the citizens of the Town regarding matters of public.concern; and
WHEREAS, the Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and
welfare to adopt this amendment to the Vail Town Code.
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Title 1, Chapter 3, Section 2 of the Vail Town Code is hereby amended by
the addition of the definition of the word "publication" which shall read as follows: l
Publication, publish or For the purposes of the Town Charter and this Code, except
Published: where publication in a newspaper is specifically required by the
Charter, an ordinance or state statute, the term "publication
"publish" or "published" shall mean posting on the Town of Vail
web site. If, for any reason, publication on the Town's web site
cannot be accomplished "publication"; "publish" or "published"
shall mean a minimum one (1) of the following two (2) methods:
(1) physical posting at the Town of Vail Municipal Building; or (2)
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of
.Vail.
Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence; clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council. hereby declares it would have
passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof,
.regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
Ordinance No. 30, Series 2008 1
Section 3. The amendment of. any provision of the Town Code as provided in this
ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that
occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or
proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of
any provision hereby shall not revive -any. provision or any ordinance previously repealed or
superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 4. , All bylaws, orders; resolutions . and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer, shall
not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore
repealed.
Section 5. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the. Town of, Vail and the inhabitants
thereof.
INTRODUCED, READ . ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 2nd da? of December, 2008 and a public
hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 16' day of December, 2008, in the
Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Richard Cleveland, Town Mayor .
Attest:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
Ordinance No. 30, Series 2008
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: December 2, 2008
SUBJECT: A worksession to discuss Resolution No. 25, Series of 2008, a resolution
amending the fees assessed for certain. Planning & Environmental
Commission, Design Review Board, and. Administrative development
review applications, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The "2008 Communitv Development Department Work. Plan" identifies the task of
evaluating and adjusting, if necessary, the existing fees for certain development review
applications to more accurately reflect the cost of the service provided. In evaluating
the application fees, staff will be focusing only on those.. application types where it is
demonstrated that the cost of the service provided significantly outweighs the existing
fee charged for the service.
For instance, the Community Development Department currently charges $650 to
process an application for a conditional use permit. In analyzing the actual costs (labor
and overhead) associated with processing an application for a conditional use permit
through the Town's' required development review process, conservative estimates
suggest that the community is presently subsidizing nearly 60%, or $975 of the total cost
of the review ($1,625).
The Community Development is requesting that the Town Council provides any input or
feedback they may have on the Town's present fee schedule philosophy and instruct staff, if
it is determined appropriate, to return to the Town Council 'with proposed adjustments to the
review fees.
II. BACKGROUND
Year to date, the Town of Vail Community Development Department has processed ,a total
of 669 development applications: Of the 669. applications, 73 of the applications required.
Planning & Environmental review and the remaining 596 required Design Review Board
review. As of November 25, 2008; the total application,fee revenue received by the Town of
Vail Community Development. Department for the review of'all development applications
received is $104,959.24. Assuming that the Planning Team dedicates only 80% of its time
on current planning applications, the Town will spend nearly $296,153.60 (plus overhead) to
process all 2008 development applications, resulting in a projected deficit of $191,194.36
(plus overhead).
1
0
STEEL PARKING SCREEN
STONE CLAD WALLS AT
STAIR ENCLOSURES
SLOPING METAL ROOFS 14 121
EMPLOYEE HOUSING FLATS
0
STONE CLAD PLANTERS -
STUCCO AND PANEL SYSTEM
AT EMPLOYEE HOUSING
T 1 ?117v, 1
? i ? ?1? IIII
,ESE.. _..... _...
STONE CLAD PLANTERS
EMPLOYEE HOUSING
FLATS ON TERRACE LEVEL
3 LEVELS ABOVE GRADE
PARKING
a
}7'?
DYNAMIC RIDGE LINES
1 LEVEL OF 2 STOREY
EMPLOYEE TOWN HOUSES
i k
2 LEVELS OF 2 STOREY
E MPLOYEE TOWN HOUSES
1
VAiL R"? o T5' '? EVER VAIL
. „ . ?o..„. C A L L I S O N Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
STONE CLAD WALLS AT STAIR
AND ELEVATOR ENCLOSURE
STUCCO AND PANEL SYSTEM
STEEL PARKING SCREEN
GLASS CANOPY AT DAY SKIER
PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE
•
:r - -
?I
0 IO 20 40 80
W1 I BUILDING ELEVATIONS 26
•
GLASS AND PANEL WALL
SYSTEM
METAL AND COMPOSITE -
PANELS AT BALCONIES
owl
STONE CHIMNEYS AND BASE
STUCCO
PRIMARY GABLE METAL
ROOF 4:12 SLOPE
Mimi
I 1? min
•
SECONDARY SHED ROOFS
METAL AND COMPOSITE STONE CLAD CHIMNEYS
PANELS AT BALCONIES AND BASE
GLASS AND PANEL WALL
SYSTEM STUCCO -
STONEWALL SAT GLASS CANOPY AT PRIMARY
WALKWAYS RETAIL PAVILION GABLE ROOFS
AII,
=, 1?j? i¦ ?1,
METAL ROOF
412 SLOPE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AT
2 STOREY EMPLOYEE RED SANDSTONE CREEK
TOWN HOUSES GLASS CANOPY AT RETAIL
PAVILION
1
SAIL R 5 ?1
SEGMENTED MASSING
- STONE RETAIL BASE - 2 STOREY EMPLOYEE RAMP TO PARKING -?
TOWN HOUSES BELOW
f T '
-- - M 7'V 11 T"
i 1 E
^? I
i ?
Im..1-
10 20 40 80
EVER VAIL W2 & W3 I BUILDING ELEVATIONS 27
Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
•
STONE BASE GABLED RIDGE LINES
IMP=
v'
,/ ? i i i I? I?? 1? •tl ??_~ ? I i i y ?ff I
GLASS RESTAURANT
WALL ACTIVE STONE BASE
_ I
j
STONE CHIMNEYS ALPINE HORIZONTALITY
REINFORCED BY ROOFS
y AND BALCONIES
e,??E?, i?11111
- „-?., 1 1 1 1 1
QUIET STUCCO MIDDLE
ROOF ENGAGED WALL
GRADUAL RISE FROM
RE :s EVER VAIL
„...oM..„. CALLISON Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
STONE CHIMNEYS
ILa, i?
i ? I II
0 10 20 40 60
E1 & E2 I BUILDING ELEVATIONS 28
•
STONE CHIMNEYS 8 GLASS
CANOPY SIGNIFY ENTRY
V A I L/ _ R E S O R S
ULVLLDYMLNI COMPwNr CAI IISON
•
PRIMARILY GABLE ROOFS,
ENGAGED WITH WALLS
QUIET STUCCO MIDDLE WITH
PUNCHED OPENINGS
ii?
1 1
EVER VAIL
Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
It
0 10 20 40 80
E3 I BUILDING ELEVATIONS 29
GLASS 8 FRAME EXPRESSION ON SOUTH BUILDING ENDS TAPERED TO REDUCE SCALE
0 0 0
VARIETY OF STEPPING
ROOFFORMS?
STONE CLAD
RETAIL BASE
GLASS AND PANEL
SYSTEM METAL ROOF
METAL AND COMPOSITE STUCCO 412 SLOPE
PANEL BALCONIES
vLEVE_.- - I
?,? ,, i :i 1 lI t Ai I iti t ]?
i if n ;n 19 ai 1-1l
I' NJ .1 .1 1 IiP f(I I I:! 91 IIILI
STONE CLADDING
STONE CLAD CHIMNEYS
STONE RETAIL BASE GLASS AND PANEL
SYSTEM
11 1I'1?1 I I __
n I I --- --'-?
II II -? k 1! II
METAL ROOF SEGMENTED MASSING GLASS AND PANEL
TWO LEVEL EMPLOYEE 4'.11 SLOPE A SYSTEM
STONE RETAIL
TOWN HOUSES STUCC BASE
.E,E ---- - -------- r r
-- -------- - rr r rrk F f Q
A.:N., -- ---- --- -- -- -
i
1?.
Q
v
0 10 20 40 80
0
EVER VAIL E6 I BUILDING ELEVATIONS 30
Vn R E SO R TS'
a, ut?: ow Cw1115ON Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
METAL AND COMPOSITE STONE CLAD CHIMNEYS
PANEL BALCONIES
STONE BASE
ROOFS STEP HORIZONTALLY AND VEHTICALLY
SMALLER OPENINGS ON NORTH
EMPLOYEE HOUSING TOWN HOUSES
FACE FRONTAGE ROAD
VARIETY OF PUNCHED OPENINGS IN STUCCO -
EVE. , ---- - ---- ---- --- --- - -- - 1
?
AA ? I I ? I I -Ili
?
GLASS 8 FRAME EXPRESSION CONTRASTS WITH PUNCHED
OPENINGS IN STUCCO SURFACES
STUCCO WITH PUNCHED OPENINGS
TWO STORY STONE BASE
INCLUDES OFFICE OVER RETAIL
ALPINE HORIZONTALITY REINFORCED
BY ROOFS AND BALCONIES
O` -----.-- --.- - . ww
=411 ww
low
w. w
VA RESORTS'
??ri??vrn t_ni canrvnnr CALIiSON
EVER VAIL
Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
p",
o 10 zo aD aD
E7 J BUILDING ELEVATIONS 31
0 0 0
® PORTALS
• CONIC MARKERS TO E
DOORS'
PATHS
GH OUTDOOR
ICONIC ELEMENTS
• ADD DELIGHT AT KEY NODES AND
FEATURES
SPECIAL FEATURES
•LINKPEDESTRIANSTOTHEGONDOLA
• GUIDE PEDESTR.ANS THROUGH THE DISTRICTS
AND OUTDOORS ROOMS
f
TAPER BUILDINGS & CHIMNEYS
AT ENDS
VAIL R 5 'A EVER VAIL MASSING STRATEGIES 32
Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27; 2008
•
E2 VACATION CLUB 1I-
E7 RESIDENTIAL !I '
GONDOLA PLAZA BEYOND
SKIER STAIRS I ESCALATOR;,
VIEW A - COMPRESSION
E3 HOTEL 1 1 7 y
r r
f -
!9131
E2 VACATION CLUB
Awiv
BRIDGE TO VACATION CLUB -
4' ii?1t aC^ =1?-
0171 ILL-
GONDOLA 'I. -'?-y
PLAZA BEYOND - -, A
VIEW B - COMPRESSION
E1 RESIDENTIAL
E2 VACATION CLUB
E3 HOTEL
1 t?T+i
1
0
E6 RESIDENTIAL
MARKETSTREETBEYOND
E7 RESIDENTIA
E6 RESIDENTIAL
E3 HOTEL
MARKET STREET
VIEW D - COMPRESSION
1H:0.6V r,???rf?i
' 1 11,? ,?) r?=t r
rn D1 ??II
" lII T f X14 ' ,,f?
VIEW E - RELEASE
VIEW C - RELEASE
EVER VAIL WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT I EVER VAIL 33
VAIL R E SORTS'
oFwE?, ?MP, . ?A<< sow Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit October27, 2008
is
•/
,j? , KEY PLAN
SECTION A-A
V A I L/ _ R E S O R S
.E „?o
Air.. -`
8
1 H:0.8V
I?
I?
t
KEY PLAN
1H:1V ?
I1- 1H:0.6V
SECTION B-B SECTION C-C
EVER VAIL
Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
I
u' 100' zoo' 400•
1 H:0.6VV
I
-I ?
SECTION D-D l !
0' 8' 16' 24'
WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT I VAIL VILLAGE 34
0 0 0
r
r
Z?,
- ,-- 1H0-8-VT
SECTION A-A
1H:1VI
l
t-
SECTION B-B
KEY PLAN "%=
0' 100 2W' 400'
EVER VAIL WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT LIONSHEAD 35
R s ° R' S' Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
wnr C•\l15°N
................
_? r r r r r r
7- • • •
?t.
SECTION C-C
I
1H: 0.6V
i
1H:0.
KEY PLAN
I.
EVER VAIL WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT I LIONSHEAD 36
VAIL R E 50 R TS'
..,o M.?, o .. CALLIS°M Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
s
1
1
1H:1V f "
SECTION D-D
•
lip
1
I -
1H:2Vy I 1 -
I 0
SECTION E-E
KEY PLAN pmlw§?Emw I
0' I00' 200 400'
EVER VAIL WIDTH-TO-HEIGHT I LIONSHEAD 37
Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
ut?l. orrni nr turn rnr C?IIISON
• •
ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE
TRADITIONAL ALPINE
Essential Attributes of Traditional Alpine Architecture:
• Simple, sheltering roofs of moderate slope
• Anchored to the site
• Overall horizontal proportions - especially roofs and balconies
• Repetitive forms - variation on a consistent theme
• Punched openings
•
y??V EVER VAIL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER 38
VAi L R E S OR TS'
,'.'1.PMt„, =o„ _ C A L L i S O R Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
0 0
ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE
VAIL VILLAGE
Essential Attributes:
• Simple, sheltering roofs of moderate slope
• Overall horizontal proportions - especially roofs and balconies
• Repetitive forms - variation on a consistent theme
• Punched openings
•
R EVER VAIL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER 39
Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE
CONTEMPORARY ALPINE
The "stage "for the Choreographed Contrasts story
is the architecture.
By embracing the long-standing principles of alpine architecture,
reinterpreted for today's opportunities, the buildings form a timeless,
grounded home base after a day on the slopes.
Essential Attributes of a Contemporary Alpine Architecture:
• Follows timeless design principles of form, scale, order
• Responsive to the setting and environment
• Respectful of historic alpine antecedents; looks to the future
• Simple, sheltering roofs of moderate slope
• Anchored to the site
• Overall horizontal proportions - especially roofs and balconies
• Repetitive forms - variation on a consistent theme
• Punched openings
R q EVER VAIL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER 40
?LLONM„, oMP.„. CALLISON Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
•
•
R 5 EVER VAIL PERSPECTIVE VIEWS 41
°E E,° Mt° °°MP^^< CA1L15ON Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
AERIAL VIEW OF E7 AND MARKET STREET
AERIAL VIEW OVER FRONTAGE ROAD
VIEW OF E1 FROM GORE CREEK
AERIAL VIEW FROM MOUNTAIN
r • •
VIEW OF W2 AND WEST SIDE DROP-OFF
EVER VAIL PERSPECTIVE SKETCHES 42
VAIL R E 50 R TS'
oL «o M,?, M ^ ?.,L,s°R Major Exterior Alteration & Conditional Use Permit I October 27, 2008
W2 AND RED SANDSTONE CREEK
VIEW OF HOTEL FROM WEST MARKET STREET
VIEW OF CENTRAL PLAZAAND E3