Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010-05-18 Agenda and Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING SESSION AGENDA +` TM W Via' VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 6:00 P.M., MAY 18, 2010 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. 1. ITEM /TOPIC: Citizen Participation. (15 min.) PRESENTER(S): Public 2. ITEM /TOPIC: Town Manager's Report. (15 min.) PRESENTER(S): Stan Zemler 3. ITEM /TOPIC: Woody Bio -Mass Combined Heat Power Facilities. The purpose of this discussion is to: 1. introduce the proposed woody biomass combined heat and power (CHP) facility project concept, partners, and 2. provide an update to the Vail Town Council on the progress of the grant application to the Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), by the private developer, Hayden, Cary & King, Co. for $26 million toward the construction of the CHP facility. Further detail on the project as well as a question and answer period will be provided in the presentation (Attachment A) given by Andrew King, grant applicant and Principal of Hayden, Cary & King, Co. (60 min.) PRESENTER(S): Andrew King, Principal, Hayden, Cary & King, Co. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Staff requests that the Vail Town Council listen to the presentation given, and participate by asking questions and providing comment. BACKGROUND: It is the objective of the applicant, Hayden Cary & King Co., to develop and demonstrate a 28 megawatt (MW) woody biomass based CHP facility that will utilize advanced boiler design features and a high efficiency flue gas condenser to achieve a minimum thermal efficiency of 82 %. The CHP facility will demonstrate that the use of advanced Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology on a woody biomass boiler will surpass air quality emission requirements while achieving almost complete displacement of fossil fuel carbon emissions compared with an equivalent natural gas facility. In July, 2009, Hayden, Cary & King, Co., submitted a $26 million grant request to the Department of Energy through their National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) biomass grant program to construct 5/18/2010 and operate a combined heat and power facility in the United States. Mostly recently, this project has been selected by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and DOE leaders as a priority project; one that meets the needs of the USFS in addressing the beetle kill epidemic, threat to wildfire and watersheds, while also addressing excessive energy consumption, education needs, and job growth supported by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. This project was selected as one of three projects warranting further consideration out of a total of 80 grant requests. What's been done to date? • DOE Grant Request applied for in July 2009 • Preliminary Engineering and Cost Analysis concluding — Total project cost estimated at $52 million — Cost of delivered biomass estimated at $55 /ton. • Potential Project Partners Identified • Potential Facility Site(s) Identified • DOE has initiated a Project Final Feasibility Study (due September 2010) • Draft Architectural Concepts • Vail Project Makes Final Round for $26 million Grant Funding (20MW Plants, $45 million available) — First elimination - 74 applicants eliminated — Department of Energy Representatives visit Vail in April and May, 2010, three more applicants eliminated — Three remain out of 80 applicants in the country for this category, over 250 in total) • Vail Project short - listed for USFS guaranteed loans ($25 -$50 million) — 10 -20% down required ($2 -4 million of investor capital required to secure loan) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Energy has requested further engineering, biomass supply, and economic data to complete their final feasibility study. Staff is in the process of assisting Hayden Cary & King, Co. in organizing Town of Vail related information and data. Staff recommends that the following steps be implemented: • Staff will schedule public open house /informational workshops to obtain community input, provide educational background on the implications, and environmental and financial costs and benefits of a CHP facility in the Town of Vail in early June, 2010. • Staff and the developer will continue to create partnerships among project stakeholders. • Staff will ensure that a comprehensive feasibility study is performed to assess long term benefits, costs, and logistics. 4. ITEM /TOPIC: Mountain Travel Market Update. (30 min.) PRESENTER(S): Ralf Garrison BACKGROUND: Ralf Garrison will give an update on market conditions in the mountain resort industry to the Town Council and the community and answer questions. 5. ITEM /TOPIC: Holy Cross Energy easement on part of Lot 1 block 1 5/18/2010 Vail /Lionshead Third Filing. (5 min.) PRESENTER(S): Greg Hall ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Apporve the granting of an easement to Holy Cross Energy. BACKGROUND: There is a 30 ft. utility easement on the northern portion of the parcel. Holy Cross Energy facilites were in place prior to the construction of the pedestrian overpass. The construction of the overpass placed 20 feet of fill over their lines. The First Chair project is relocating a portion of the lines. Holy Cross Energy would like to relocate the remainder of their lines from underneath the fill. This additional easement is required to perform the relocation work. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the granting of the easement. 6. ITEM /TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, an ordinance repealing and re- enacting Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, amending the approved development plan and requirements for site coverage, landscaping, setbacks, and gross residential floor area for Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, in accordance with Section 12 -9A- 10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a residential addition (patio enclosure) to the North side of Unit 8, Bishop Park, located at 63 Willow Place/ Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (20 min.) PRESENTER(S): Rachel Friede ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, upon second reading. BACKGROUND: Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, was established by Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986. At that time, the purpose of the SDD was to allow for an increase in development potential while providing the public benefit of financial support for the public streamwalk. Since the establishment of SDD No. 15, there have not been any amendments to the SDD. On April 12, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission made a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, upon first reading (6 -0 -0). 7. ITEM /TOPIC: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, an ordinance repealing and re- enacting Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003, amending and reestablishing the approved development plan and density control requirements for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, in accordance with Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the conversion of meeting space to an accommodation unit at the Tivoli Lodge, located at located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/ Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (5 min.) 5/18/2010 PRESENTER(S): Rachel Friede ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, upon second reading. BACKGROUND: On April 26, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, by a vote of 6 -0 -0. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, upon first reading (5 -0 -0). Due to a predetermined conflict of interest (Tivoli employment) Newbury recused herself from the item and let the Council Chambers. 8. ITEM /TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Section 12- 14 -20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, to allow for the extension of the commercial core temporary construction signage for businesses and setting forth details in regard thereto. (5 min.) PRESENTER(S): Rachel Friede ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon second reading. BACKGROUND: On May 3, 2005, the Town Council adopted Section 12- 14-20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, through Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2005. These regulations facilitated the installation of temporary construction mitigation signs and fencing within the Town's commercial areas to lessen the impact of redevelopment construction on the Town's businesses, residents, and guests. These regulations were originally set to expire on April 1, 2008, but were extended to April 1, 2010 by Ordinance No. 4, Series of 2008. On April 26, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010 by a vote of 6 -0 -0. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon first reading (6 -0 -0). 9. ITEM /TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulation Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional movie theater, bowling alley, and public parking on private property signage, and to define the term first floor for the purposes of calculating allowable sign area, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100010) (10 min.) PRESENTER(S): Bill Gibson, Planner ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Town Council shall approve, 5/18/2010 approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, on second reading. BACKGROUND: On April 12, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted 6 -0 -0 to forward a recommendation of approval, with modifications, to the Town Council for the proposed amendments to the Town's Sign Regulations.On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved, with modifications, the first reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, by a vote of 5 -1 -0 (Donovan opposed). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Town Council approves Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, on second reading. 10. ITEM /TOPIC: Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. (30 min.) PRESENTER(S): Tom Kassmel ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Town Council approves Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan is to evaluate the current lighting conditions along the frontage roads and provide direction to the Town of Vail for improvements that are intended to: 1. Improve safe utilization of the frontage roads by motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and overflow vehicle parking. 2. Manage appropriate lights levels and illumination strategies along the frontage roads. 3. Manage long term economics and maintenance for lighting systems. 4. Establish consistency in the aesthetic appearance of lighting systems. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Town Council approves Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. 11. ITEM /TOPIC: Resolution No. 8, Series of 2010, a Resolution Approving an Intergovernmental Mutual Aid Agreement for the Provision of Law Enforcement Services and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. (10 min.) PRESENTER(S): Dwight Henninger ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 8, Series of 2010. BACKGROUND: The Town of Vail and the Eagle County Sheriff's Office entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement on March 16, 2010, authorizing the Municipal Officers to perform law enforcement functions and enforce the state laws within portions of Eagle County. The surrounding Eagle County municipalities, including the town, wish to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement allowing the Municipal Officer's to aid and 5/18/2010 assist each other by the exchange of Municipal Officers services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 8, Series of 2010. 12. ITEM /TOPIC: Resolution No. 15, Series of 2010 a Resolution Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Vail and Eagle County Regarding the Use of Eagle County's 800 MHz Area Wide Smartzone Trunked Radio Services; and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. (10 min.) PRESENTER(S): Dwight Henninger ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 15, Series of 2010. BACKGROUND: Eagle County has installed and maintained an 800 MHz radio system (the "System ") and is offering non - exclusive access of the radio system. The System will allow multi - jurisdictional agencies exclusively to communicate directly with public safety organizations, including but not limited to police activity, code enforcement, fire and emergency and disaster response. This Intergovernmental Agreement formalizes the existing process and gives authorization for a newly formed executive committee to make budget recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 15, Series of 2010. 13. ITEM /TOPIC: Adjournment. (9:35 p.m.) NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: (ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 6:00 P.M., TUESDAY, JUNE 1, IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 5/18/2010 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Town Manager's Report. PRESENTER(S): Stan Zemler 5/18/2010 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Woody Bio -Mass Combined Heat Power Facilities. The purpose of this discussion is to: 1. introduce the proposed woody biomass combined heat and power (CHP) facility project concept, partners, and 2. provide an update to the Vail Town Council on the progress of the grant application to the Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), by the private developer, Hayden, Cary & King, Co. for $26 million toward the construction of the CHP facility. Further detail on the project as well as a question and answer period will be provided in the presentation (Attachment A) given by Andrew King, grant applicant and Principal of Hayden, Cary & King, Co. PRESENTER(S): Andrew King, Principal, Hayden, Cary & King, Co. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Staff requests that the Vail Town Council listen to the presentation given, and participate by asking questions and providing comment. BACKGROUND: It is the objective of the applicant, Hayden Cary & King Co., to develop and demonstrate a 28 megawatt (MW) woody biomass based CHP facility that will utilize advanced boiler design features and a high efficiency flue gas condenser to achieve a minimum thermal efficiency of 82 %. The CHP facility will demonstrate that the use of advanced Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology on a woody biomass boiler will surpass air quality emission requirements while achieving almost complete displacement of fossil fuel carbon emissions compared with an equivalent natural gas facility. In July, 2009, Hayden, Cary & King, Co., submitted a $26 million grant request to the Department of Energy through their National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) biomass grant program to construct and operate a combined heat and power facility in the United States. Mostly recently, this project has been selected by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and DOE leaders as a priority project; one that meets the needs of the USFS in addressing the beetle kill epidemic, threat to wildfire and watersheds, while also addressing excessive energy consumption, education needs, and job growth supported by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. This project was selected as one of three projects warranting further consideration out of a total of 80 grant requests. What's been done to date? • DOE Grant Request applied for in July 2009 • Preliminary Engineering and Cost Analysis concluding — Total project cost estimated at $52 million — Cost of delivered biomass estimated at $55 /ton. • Potential Project Partners Identified 5/18/2010 • Potential Facility Site(s) Identified • DOE has initiated a Project Final Feasibility Study (due September 2010) • Draft Architectural Concepts • Vail Project Makes Final Round for $26 million Grant Funding (20MW Plants, $45 million available) — First elimination - 74 applicants eliminated — Department of Energy Representatives visit Vail in April and May, 2010, three more applicants eliminated — Three remain out of 80 applicants in the country for this category, over 250 in total) • Vail Project short - listed for USFS guaranteed loans ($25 -$50 million) — 10 -20% down required ($2 -4 million of investor capital required to secure loan) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Energy has requested further engineering, biomass supply, and economic data to complete their final feasibility study. Staff is in the process of assisting Hayden Cary & King, Co. in organizing Town of Vail related information and data. Staff recommends that the following steps be implemented: • Staff will schedule public open house /informational workshops to obtain community input, provide educational background on the implications, and environmental and financial costs and benefits of a CHP facility in the Town of Vail in early June, 2010. • Staff and the developer will continue to create partnerships among project stakeholders. • Staff will ensure that a comprehensive feasibility study is performed to assess long term benefits, costs, and logistics. ATTACHMENTS: CUP Biomass Facility Memo CUP Biomass Facility PowerPoint Presentation 5/18/2010 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 18, 2010 RE: Combined Heat and Power - Biomass Facility I. PURPOSE The purpose of this memo is to, • introduce the proposed woody biomass combined heat and power (CHP) facility project concept, partners, and • provide an update to the Vail Town Council on the progress of the grant application to the Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), by the private developer, Hayden, Cary & King, Co. for $26 million toward the construction of the CHP facility. Further detail on the project as well as a question and answer period will be provided in the presentation (Attachment A) given by Andrew King, grant applicant and Principal of Hayden, Cary & King, Co. II. BACKGROUND It is the objective of the applicant, Hayden Cary & King Co., to develop and demonstrate a 28 megawatt (MVV) woody biomass based CHP facility that will utilize advanced boiler design features and a high efficiency flue gas condenser to achieve a minimum thermal efficiency of 82 %. The CHP facility will demonstrate that the use of advanced Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology on a woody biomass boiler will surpass air quality emission requirements while achieving almost complete displacement of fossil fuel carbon emissions compared with an equivalent natural gas facility. In July, 2009, Hayden, Cary & King, Co., submitted a $26 million grant request to the Department of Energy through their National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) biomass grant program to construct and operate a combined heat and power facility in the United States. Mostly recently, this project has been selected by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and DOE leaders as a priority project; one that meets the needs of the USFS in addressing the beetle kill epidemic, threat to wildfire and watersheds, while also addressing excessive energy consumption, education needs, and job growth supported by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. This project was selected as one of three projects warranting further consideration out of a total of 80 grant requests. What's been done to date? • DOE Grant Request applied for in July 2009 • Preliminary Engineering and Cost Analysis concluding - Total project cost estimated at $52 million 1 5/18/2010 3 -1 -1 - Cost of delivered biomass estimated at $55 /ton. • Potential Project Partners Identified • Potential Facility Site(s) Identified • DOE has initiated a Project Final Feasibility Study (due September 2010) • Draft Architectural Concepts • Vail Project Makes Final Round for $26 million Grant Funding (20MW Plants, $45 million available) - First elimination - 74 applicants eliminated - Department of Energy Representatives visit Vail in April and May, 2010, three more applicants eliminated - Three remain out of 80 applicants in the country for this category, over 250 in total) • Vail Project short - listed for USFS guaranteed loans ($25 -$50 million) - 10 -20% down required ($2 -4 million of investor capital required to secure loan) III. NEXT STEPS The Department of Energy has requested further engineering, biomass supply, and economic data to complete their final feasibility study. Staff is in the process of assisting Hayden Cary & King, Co. in organizing Town of Vail related information and data. Hayden Cary & King, Co. continues to work with potential project partners in establishing a complete list of parties interested in purchasing green energy and retrofitting their boilers to be compatible with a district heating system. In addition, staff will: • Schedule public open house /informational workshops to obtain community input, provide educational background on the implications, and environmental and financial costs and benefits of a CHP facility in the Town of Vail in early June, 2010. • Continue to create partnerships among project stakeholders. • Conduct a Town feasibility study to assess long term benefits, costs, and logistics. Remaining Department of Energy steps to determine grant awards: • Final Review by Department of Energy - USFS is conducting biomass supply study within 50 mile radius of Vail - Final review of preliminary engineering, boiler /chiller load requirements and economic feasibility • Grant Recipients awarded in June 2010 • Contract Negotiations July- September at the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA If Town of Vail determines the Project is appropriate: • Town Development Application Process (PEC, DRB, Town Council review) • Conditional Use Permit • Land Lease negotiations • Permitting, (air, water, sewer, stormwater, operations, monitoring, reporting) • Environmental Impact Report • Construction Process IV. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A. Combined Heat and Power - Biomass Facility Presentation 2 5/18/2010 3 -1 -2 Mountain Community Vertically Integrated Project Background Biomass CHP and District Heating Plant Demonstration Project • Why Utilize Biomass for Energy? — Beetle Kill Epidemic • Wildfire • Forest Health • Watershed Health • Ecosystem Health • Environmental Benefits • Economic Benefits � •Barriers • �,k ,� • • Overview y ' yY• • Partner Introduction Wyoming - • Project Background Colorado , y { Why Biomass for Energy? • Beetle Kill Epidemic (Eagle County) ' • Fire, Environment, Water • Community Goals • ? ' • Project Technology /Examples - - -- • Economic Cost /Benefit" F • Environmental Cost /Benefit • Bio -fuels Availability _ _ - p— • What's Been Done to Date? • What's Next? r �. , [ _.'..,p - nw�•�mpl- e�.•d• Collection Point Logistics u^`j _ -Sprvce 9ee,ls Q • �. n uestion and Answer- Discussion 1 x:'3010 The Situation in Eagle County Watersheds Outside of the large fires in the WUI, watershed damage is the second largest threat facing Eagle • Rapidly approaching 80 -90% mortality levels in County some stands -Over 50,000 acres infested presently Eagle River Watershed - 970 square miles, including 77 miles of the main- • 3,911 private properties with $2,128,469,710 stem of the Eagle River estimated of property value are potentially at risk - Important to the Valley's tourism based economy as well as a source of drinking water and wildlife • Sudden Aspen Decline (SAD) increasing habitat • Ever growing WUI- more people in harm's way —Fire danger increasing — Hazard trees impacting roadways, recreation, public _ safety + Fire Danger Watersheds (cont) • USFS- managed portion of the watershed consists o minimally- disturbed pine forests at the end of their • Short -term increase due to build up of '` disturbance regime fine fuels (needles, twigs, grasses) • Surface fuel loading in the unmanaged _PP stands - Change in ignitibility of LPP forests adjacent to much of Eagle County's WUI has reached levels conducive to high intensity surface • Long -term threats related to falling trees fire Aaa - Surface fuel loading may lead to catastrophic fire - Potential for severe watershed damage Is?0]0 41 CHP Facility Benefits to Eagle County u. Watersheds (cont) • Direct • Reducing the threat of catastrophic - Environmental Benefits • Air Quality wildfire in this watershed insures better — Smoke developed during large fires water quality and economic sustainability - Minimize Open Burning • Large diameter surface fuels lead to - Watershed protection • Manage fuels in critical watersheds increased soil heating during fire, creating Minimize human caused ignitions hydrophobic soil layers, potentially contributing to huge increases in post -fire Indirect sediment export - Economic stimulation - Damage municipal water intake facilities and • Jobs fish habitat • Renewable Energy • Tourism - Could lead to landslides - lmproveview -sheds — Recreation Opportunities and WTAU CHP Facility Benefits to Eagle County Barriers to mitigate problem r • Lack of a practical market for the enormous • Direct quantity of timber and biomass — Reduce treatment costs associated w ith — Increasing amount of cull material is greater than the USFS can treat with existing methods, and that current markets fuels projects translating into more can utilize. acreage treated • Most WUI areas in Eagle County border public lands - USFS fuels money pales in comparison to fire im - Life safety of those living in the WUI budgeting • Wildfire — Where we can get the trees out —they are currently not worth the cost to extract from the forest Hazard Trees • Other Issues — Wilderness and Roadless Areas — Steep Slopes / rugged topography — Logging industry in CO a shadow of it"sf�. — Fire Use /Rx Fire: not always an option giveg quality i; 1 ti' 2010 3 -2 -3 3 Why Biomass for Energy in the Current Natural Gas Expenditures „- V ail Community? In the month of January alone, at$9.32/md *for commercial sector, these 5 projects spend $575.98 per hour, $13,823.42 per day, and $165,881.09 per month. Community Goals Total Expenditure = $2.5 million —Reduce Town of Vail energy consumption Vail CHP Popp Partners Newrel Gas Ex nd itures by 20% by 2020, (80% by 2050). — Watershed Protection — Wildfire Mitigation due to Pine Beetle Vail Forest Health Project 2009 Fire Acres Trees Cut Trees Plies Controlled Fire Cr— Chipped R a�oo oo. 6 142 557 329 B urne d 1500 B urns 30 33 as°,°°° "Projected pdee of natural gas per mcf in 2011 per Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, Early Release, 2010 Town of Vail Snowmelt System - Vail Village Vail CHIP Partner Properties Total Thermal Load Requirements in BTUlhr ]0,000,000 so,000,000 - -_- 50,000,000 - - N 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 - 10,000,000 0 Xp n P ( 2 d° O 6` ye Month Fill 5/18/2010 3 -2 -4 4 CHP Proposed Location Hospital CHP Plant in Sweden 170 CHP Design and Technology • Condense high-pressure steam out of the steam turbine exhaust and deliver it as hot water to commercial and municipal users • 28.3 MW Thermal (input) Capacity — • Process 8 tons woody biomass /hr at 17.5% moisture content (actual levels closerto 12% on average) ,e,,,.• s: Uses: `. -Electrical Production -Street Heating -Building Heating and Cooling 5/18/2010 3 -2 -5 5 l nside modern CHP Energy Solutions That Work! �, .. . •Use all of the turbine heat exhaust J�7' -' .! • Get high Recovery of energy from fuel used � ���,_- rr ,� ,+ ,, � F • � " •Automation equals efficiency +e� <• E. -,� • Planning ti , — Fuel supply first — PPA — Heating/ Cooling clients It —Site Selection State of the AA Automation Good Economics Make a Successful IONS costs Project! • Harvest efficiently • Add value whenever possible (Manufacture added value high demand high value products. • Transport efficiently • Use the whole tree • Use the lowest quality and value wood for fuel • Recover and use all of the energy in the fuel. AAW Is 'ul�l 6 ' CHP Cost Analysis Bales vs. Chips • 19,200,000 BTU per ton of biomass, 19.2 decatherms /ton • Cost of biomass processing = $55 /dry ton delivered i •Clean Fuel (wj B CAP subsidy for 50% Transportation & Harvesting,$19 /ton for 15 — Harvesting -$18 /ton • Transport efficiency — Transportation - (within 50 miles) $20 /ton • Storage efficiency — Plant operation - $17 /ton g y Town currently pays a discounted rate of • Lower cost if done the way it was $5.25 /decatherm for 75% of its facilities from Holy Cross (variable rate for 25 %). Biomass could supply this designed to work. same amount of energy for $2.86 /decatherm) • Energy costs continue to rise ($9.32 /decatherm in 2011 *) Note, green power will be purchased at o premium from Holy Cross *socrre:ece�ymsamre famerrro, CHP Design and Technology Vail Community, Regional, National Benefits •Condense high - pressure steam out of • Environment the steam turbine exhaust and deliver it as _ hot water to commercial and municipal — Natural Gas use reductions — CO, Emissions reductions users • 28.3 MWThermal(input) Capacity T,.... 17,000tons • Process 8 tons woody biomass /hr at „o,'r — Cost savings overtime (rising energy prices) 17.5% moisture content (actual levels closer to is t on average) — Model for other resort communities � j - - ` ^ Vu}+_ - Watershed Protection Job creation _ ) Colorado Mountain College Program C— John Deere Equipment Operators • Economic driver uses: • Tourism -Electrical Production •Street Heating •Education • Building Heating and Cooling Commercial expansion 5/18/2010 3 -2 -7 7 What's Been Done to Date? • DOE Grant Applied for, July 2009 Project Partners • Preliminary Engineering and Cost Analysis • Potential Project Partners Identified f^ • Potential Facility Site(s) Identified • DOE —final feasibility study (due Sept 2010) Town of Vail Solaris • Draft Architectural Concepts Eagle County Sonnenalp Resort of Vail Vail Resorts Four Seasons • Vail Project Makes Final Round for $26 million • US Forest Service Vail Valley Medical Center Grant Funding (20MW Plants, $45 million available) National Renewable Energy Colorado Renewable — lst elimination 74 applicants eliminated Laboratory Resources Cooperative — Department of Energy Representatives visit Vail in April US Department of Energy Denver Water and May, 2010, 3 more applicants eliminated Colorado State Forest Service • Fritzlen Pierce Architects — 3 remain out of 80 applicants in the country for our Holy Cross Energy category, over 250 in total) EnvioEnergi • Vail Project short - listed for USFS guaranteed loans ($25 -$50 million) 10-20% down required • $2 -4 million of investor capital required to secw What's Next? Colorado Renewable Resources Cooperative • Town of Vail Community Education, Outreach and Mission Discussion • Final Review by Department of Energy Provide Colorado residents with renewable biomass prod blestewardh th e ractcsr • Grant Recipients Awarded in June estrethe _ responsible p prat f • Contract Negotiations July- September, Pittsburgh oarforsts. • Town Feasibility Process • If Town of Vail Determines the Project Appropriate: — Town Development Application Process (PEC, DRB, Town Council review) — Conditional Use — Land lease negotiations . r .. — Permitting, (air, water, sewer, stormwater, operations, monitoring, reporting) — Environmental Impact Report { iw — Construction Process fi4� 1X20]0 L ght Impact, Efficient Harvesting m. Unique Forest Machinery Harvester Slash Bundler Forwarder + Processes Small Log Processes Biomass Hauls Bales and Stems Stems Limbs Lifts — No Dragging • Cut -to- Length System Up to 1500 lb. Bales Minimal Roads Required • 30 ft. Boom Reach Clean Green Fuel Discussion and Q & A AL w Thank You 5,18/2010 3 -2 -9 9 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Mountain Travel Market Update. PRESENTER(S): Ralf Garrison BACKGROUND: Ralf Garrison will give an update on market conditions in the mountain resort industry to the Town Council and the community and answer questions. ATTACHMENTS: Mountain Travel Market Update Memo May 18 meeting Mountain Travel Market Update May 2010 5/18/2010 I'M W N 0 VAKI VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Mountain Travel Market update (30 minutes) PRESENTER: Ralf Garrison, Mountain Travel Research Program BACKGROUND: Ralf Garrison will give an update on market conditions in the mountain resort industry to the Town Council and the community and answer questions. ATTACHMENTS: Mountain Travel Market Update May 2010 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657 p. (866) 650 -9020 (970) 479 -2100 www.vailgov.com 5/18/2010 TRiP Vail Town Council May 18, 2010 Fleview ■ ■ . Property of MTRiP LLC • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 • Confidential Information TRiP 2010 Destinations W 'OA, LOA LOA LOA MU LOA A s pe n u °u u °u u °u u°u u°u u °u ■ • w w w w w w - Roo ms • - Mill IJ°II IJ°II IJ°II UM IJ°II • Beaver reek " Boo ked LU W ' LUM 'LU U LUM M ' Breckenridge -Avg Price IJ °II IJ °II =III =III =III pill �_ , WWW Copper ISO— w w u ' 'LUM w w E Durango (pending) IJ °II u °II =III =III =III u °II ,.,., ',.,., Keystone 0.1°11 0.1111 0.1111 Mill Mill Mill Mt Bachelor w w w w w w Mill Mill VIII Mill VIII VIII ■ Mammoth Lakes 0. w w www w . North Lake Tahoe Data Center ■ Park City LI °II LI °II IJ °II LMJ °II IJ°II LMJ °II ;SM • Snowmass IJ °II IJ °II UM °II u °II LMJ °II LMJ °II MM wwww MM • Steamboat °�� . L-� °�� L-� °�� L-� °�� L-� °11 L' Summit County " u ° Telluride Mill Mill Mill Mill Mill Mill ■ M ountain • - ' ' ' ' ' ' Vail w w w w w w E IJ °II IJ °II IJ °II IJ °II IJ °II IJ °II Travel News Talker LUM 'LUM 'LUM 'LUM 'LUM 'LUM Winter Park M ountain IJ °II u °II u °II V °II u °II V °II Ec onometrics , LOA w w w w w M o u ntain . 01111 01111 01111 01111 01111 01111 T R P- MTRiP System Schema LE M .. Property W • Report II 0 Reservation w w w w w uw Activity Reports 0.1111 0.1111 0.1111 0.1111 0.1111 0.1111 w w w w w w � � � � IJell IJell IJell Data Center Destination w w w w w w Occupancy ME] w w w w w Reports ueu ueu ueu ueu ueu ueu meliWoi W o'i Woi Wo'i W oi W Industry ueu, ueir; ueu, ueu „ueu ueu, Aggregate mall M ountain intelligence Reports e ii iiWll W oii W W Travel News Talker uau,.r ,uau: IMMUU' au U' III Mountain Travel Newsletter ",-A Econometrics Mountain Market Briefing . � Custom Reports P IJ I I I 3 TRiP Vail Town Council May 18, 2010 Vail Participation Report Represents (2,100) Units, (57 %) of total Community Census of (3,684) Units TRIP Vail Town Council May 18, 2010 AGENDA 1. Data set as of 4/30/10: MTRi P Solstice 2. Review: Winter 2009/2010 3. Economic Indicators as of 4/30/10 4. Preview: Summer 2010 TRiP Vail Town Council May 18, 2010 Winter 2009/2010 (November — April) Property of MTRiP LL(; • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 Confidential Information � VA Va Occupancy EE�R.1.e. iRiYii lElliR #M .RG4RAAL Winter 2009 -2010 As of Apr. 30t ", 2010 +6% +7% +8% +4% +7% + 4% d CL 100% 100% 0 0 80% 71% o 0 ° 60% o 80% 0 57% 53% 54 % 52% CD °/ 60% U ° 40% o 40% 40% «s ] W60%10 % 20% 20% 7% 8% 4% 7% 4% ° M 0% HstodcActLdO� . Rate (2008/09season) 0% CL v 20% �Occup. Rateasof:Apd130,2010(20N10s�on) -10% 20% D Occx p. Rate as of: April 30, 2009 (20009 soon) 40% --*—Percent CtwW i n YTD Ox. Rate 40% November December January February March April V inter total Industry *: + 1 %1 *Preliminary Property "" -LC • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 4- 2 - 7 -)nfidential Information U l m Va i I Rate MOREL°. 7RAVII 0111clR #N oilocikAm Winter 2009 -2010 As of Apr. 30th, 2010 0% Q $ ^ 500 - N 4% 0% a $350 -2% as $300 4% N N 4% a $250 A, -6% N 6% v $200 c °J -5% o $150 ` - 8/o v DADR as of: April 30, 2010 (200�''D season) $100 DADR as of: April 30,2009(2008/09 season) -10 % $50 o Historic Actual ADR (2008/09 season) -12% 12 /o -13% --*—Percent Change i n YTD ADR $0 1 14% November December January February March April Winter total Industry *: = *Preliminary Property of 1WRVPLLC • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 4 -2 - Confidential Information W EE= Vail RevPAR MORE1.e. iRiYii !EE•i i! •! Winter 2009 -2010 As of Apr. 30t ', 2010 O% M MO +8% m m 1 1 $350 6 , 10% 0') o CO °° 8% 8% M $300 � N 6% a 10 Ln $250 �r N 0 4% a $200 2% CL &. 0% 1% 1% 0% $150 2% \ I o $100 ! O RevPAR as of: Apri 130, 201D (2009/D season) N -4% 0 0 -6% -6% D RevPAR of: April 0,2009 (2008 09 soon) -6% a $50 — HstoricActual RevPAR(200&09season) f Percent C� �arW in YTD RevPAR -9% 8% $0 -10% November December January February March April Winter total Industry *: . *Preliminary Property of 1WRVPLLC • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 4 -2 - Confidential Information wE FA M Occupancy Rate: MOUNTAIN TRAV[i RISSARCM RNGCRAM. Vail vs. Other Mountain Resorts Winter 2009/10 vs. Winter 2008/09 80% avail DOther Individual Destinations Al Destination Aggregate 70% 60% m 58 57 52 50 e M ■ 41% JAI 4z ,, c 40 M . v , O 30 25% 4V 20 % 5' Caution: Preliminary Data... 10% 0% Nov -09 Dec -09 Jan -10 Feb -10 Mar -10 Apr -10 Winter months total 5/18/2010 4 -2- 10 Property of IVITRiP LLC • www.mti • 303.722.7346 Confidential Informatic 2009 -2010: 6 59.7 million 60.5 *estimate per NSAA 58.9 57.3 57.1 57.4 c 56.9 57 0 55.1 4 V � V 54.1 54.4 en 53.7 53.9. 54.0 > 53.3 53 52.7 52.5 cc 51.9 52.1 52.2 0 c 50.8 in L 50.0 c'' 49 46.7 45 0 �� V\ ���� \ ���� \ ���� \ ��� e � �� o ti��� \ o ti��� \ o ti�� o ti�� 0\ o ti��� \ o ti��� \o ti��� \o ti�� 1\o ti��� \o ti��� \ � o 5/18/2010 4 -2 -11 M,.A M Observations: Winter 09 -10 NIMUNTaea ,RAYFt 116,11aR -C. #14104k.ft (as of 4/30/10) • Economic Environment: Evolving to Recovery, butC • Demand for Vacations: Little Significant Change Yet • Stimulus Required: More or Less, Sooner or Later • Market Mix: Int'I /Nat'l vs. Regional /Local • Yield Challenges: Spending Rate to get Occupancy • Impacts of Snow: Not So Much (Destination Guest) • Overall Results: Occupancy UP, Rate DOWN 5,18,z010 • Anecdotal: 4- Positive "Buzz" looking forward TRIP Vail Town Council May 18, 2010 no me trics Economic and Travel Indicators NA Consumer Confidence Index MOUNTAIN InAv" .,,.A..E. P.O. "A May a08 — Apr a10 120 —`,C�Umet Con`aden: e lay fax (Confenmce6oar4 110 W Iff Yea 100 M 10 70 68.1 W.9 698 56.6 678 54.0 61,.9 �. & ... .,...+�/b.. T ........ ...gg ,.. . , .. A9 3 30 dA,9 dT.d 48.7 +6&,4 SOS 40 36.x7 _ 37.7 392 Ips'7fl Apr'09 Mon h 30 26A _ 2e.9 20 10 May41 Au j41 NaLcal Fame MatpOa W6 kaw09 Fa6-10 Rrnm� fSxinmr»Re�M 5/18,/2010 Property of MTRiP LLC i \AMw.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 • Confidential Information = Consumer Confidence Index r` 10 Jan `00 — A rr4d+l laI4 rrxvII . �. srarcr rHaeiarw p IOU IOU Avarage6 boo ' tCoflSlmor Confidvnce I a r ex(C0flference Boaro 140 130 1 121 so 110 a 80 Y ` 70 T ' s 0 40 30 4O 10 1 L L L L Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan -01 Jul -01 Jan -02 Jul -01 Jart-03 Jul43 JawM Jul -04 Jan-03 Jul -01 Jan -08 Jul -08 Jan-07 Jul47 Jan-08 Jul -01 Jmn-09 M46 Jmn4O SM" COUP MM600M month 5/18/2010 Property of MTRiP LLC Z vVWw.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 • Confidential Information I r — U.S. Index of Leading Economic Indicators MOUNTAIN Inavu 4151i.'[M r.o>.r.r Ap 09 Mar 10 120 Year O Pewerl & ange 2009110 rs- 200FJD5 X2"10 Dala t --4— 20NO DdJa 115 1516 1x 13% pgy� 1116 � i10 U ias� a.ax 7% � 105 :% % � 116 100 .,.z� MO t � � a Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sap Oct Noy Doe Jan Fah Afar Aug Sam T1*OW m8oerd 5/18/2010 Property of MTRiP LL (t i Www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 • Confidential Information TRiP Vail Town Council May 18, 2010 VJ Summer 2010 (May — October) Property of MTRi? LLG • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 Confidential Information v Vb,,d hism Vail Occu �9R' ■T ■1■ iRiYii lEEIi RiN •R GCRAAL Summer 2010 As of Apr. 30 2010 + 35% + 15% + 30% 1 + 53% + 14% 0� 100% HistoricActual Occup. Rate (2009 Season) 100% CL D Occup. Rate as of: April 30,2D13 (201D Season) 80% 0 Occup. Rate as of: April 30, 2009 (2009 Season) 80% O .E 60% } Percent Change in YTD Occ. Rate ° 0 60% a, 53% 33% 15% 19% 30% 14% 17% as 20% o ° 14% 20% a� 0% -4 % 0% R -20% -20% CL v -40% -40% O -60% -50% -60% May June July August September October Summer total OnThe Books -------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -► Industry * : + 9% Caution: Limited Data Set! *Preliminary 5 ; IS 2010 Property of MTRiP LLC • ww�CrMHr .org • 303.722.7346 • Confidential Information W Vh,,d EE= Vail Rate N9•'■Takew iRiYii !EE•i RiN ••GCEA� Summer 2010 As of Apr. 30th, 2010 •�� �� + . � +8% 0 % Ln $200 " CO o 10% 04 $180 — 7% ua a, r— 8% � 5% o $160 a $140 �s �2 0% } 0% «r 2% cs cD a� a $100 A, - 6% - 5 % �r - 5% U $80 -10% D ADR as of: April 30,20'0 (2017 Season) $60 0 ADR as of: April 30, 2009 (2009 Season) 15% as $40 Historic Actual ADR (2009 Season) $20 f Percent Change i n YTD ADR 20% -23% $0 25% May June July August September October Summer total On The Books ----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -♦ Industry *: + 4% Caution: Limited Data Set! *Preliminary Property of MTRiP LLC • WV :.4- Z - 'y).org • 303.722.7346 • Confidential Information v Vb,,d hism Vail RevPAR ii9RETal'R 7RAYii 2111asRim PROGRAM Summer 2010 As of Apr. 30 2010 +26% + 22% o% 13% .. D RevPAR as of: April 30,20'0(20T) Season) $80 D RevPAR as of: April 30, 2009 (2009 Season) 40% 26% Historic Actual RevPAR(2009 Season) 30% $ 26% f Percent Change in YTD RevPAR a ° 20% $60 22 16% 13% 10% a $50 0% 0% t> $40 -10% GO GO GO $30 N v "o -20% V c $20 F? oo -30% a 53% GO -40% $10 -50% $0 -60% May June July August September October Summer total OnThe Books ---------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -♦ Industry *: + 13% Caution. Limited Data Set. *Preliminary 5/18/2010 Property of MTRiP LLC • ww�CrMrl�.org • 303.722.7346 • Confidential Information � Occupancy Rate: Vail vs. Other Mountain Resorts iNOUNTAIN TRiYfi 2151ARCM PROGRAM. Summer 2010 vs. Summer 2009 50% Vail D Other Individual Destinations 45% - Ad Destination Aggregate 1 40% 35% Caution: Preliminary Data... 30% m , m , a 25% M zs V O 20% 18 15% 15% lo 1a r, 10% of 6% 5% — — 0% WY -10 Jun -10 Jul -10 Aug -10 Sep -10 Oct -10 Summer months total 5/18/2010 4 -2 -21 Property of MTRiP LLC • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 Confidential Informatic Mh,. A = WhIIIINNa- Outlook: Summer 2010 MOUNTAIN TRiVfi 2E611fR #N 0410fb.ft (as of 4/30/10) Overall Market Conditions: Sorta Better❑ Maybe More favorable than last year❑ Frugality Fatigue Prospects for Recovery: Positive, but❑ Oil /Fuel, Currency: Favorable to domestic travel Consumers: No longer in shock, but still thrifty Suppliers forewarned: Strategies vary widely: Consumers can be captured with "right" offer: ➢ More /Less, Sooner /Later Bright Spots: Lifestyle and Occasion Travel, Boomer Biking Concerns: Lingering Lag: Impacts from Real Estate Pipeline of Lodging Supply Lingering Real Estate down turn y Impacts on locals, labor force Predicted Summer Outcome: Uncertain 5/18/2010 4 -2 -22 TRiP Vail Town Council May 18, 2010 r" e rgarrison(ab-mtri p. orq 303.722.7346 Property of MTR'P LLC • www.mtrip.org • 303.722.7346 23 Confidential Information 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Holy Cross Energy easement on part of Lot 1 block 1 Vail /Lionshead Third Filing. PRESENTER(S): Greg Hall ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Apporve the granting of an easement to Holy Cross Energy. BACKGROUND: There is a 30 ft. utility easement on the northern portion of the parcel. Holy Cross Energy facilites were in place prior to the construction of the pedestrian overpass. The construction of the overpass placed 20 feet of fill over their lines. The First Chair project is relocating a portion of the lines. Holy Cross Energy would like to relocate the remainder of their lines from underneath the fill. This additional easement is required to perform the relocation work. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the granting of the easement. ATTACHMENTS: Easement Document 5/18/2010 ,%v��`o 'v vs � �a^Emt°cop ro>'0rn�u o o o = wo c0 O ."Ei m `o -Q o wU _ moo "ie a YmmLYVOO �c O C �- w� =_� v > s `n `o v o v°'c aEiuLOv n u n s c�'a c cv "ro c b aa,� -,au°v « E o a a of y N L 0 v E c a 3 > v v mxw ° °aa $ro vaa - op a c vac. >.sU v o ro u o� v' a._> E' >v ro vOc a� vvro roa n °vaa��vowa v>. co voE t .o „�o � =m �Z'Ea av' '��v z %�i5u t° s L ° - ° o v�rnN o cads Ey O a�ro oI >.�a, —.- N��9�N — - a o �, o b - v .m -. v� - ° t ° u_z - °o, ° = ° c `o_uoxoo piT = r u u o z 3mc� o� E,�, -c ° A «uo c c EE`° 2c.wvro� a uroi0 L L E ro J z w 2 au o'rt s �a�d « ° o « a >aa c Lo a o Q Q Q v w' ^ a �n ca° °m v ma ..crn buo. as> E ul �p"°v m of ro;: ^+ a ` E-- —EE o�y cL.a ° aa c am a '^nv ro b a�� a L 'u w 0 DO N yy Lo D v� 0 a' u�os o'�YVCam� rocrrov `u c « > Z z w = Nv Z �«9 9 ro N « NW��L Ctiv ro DN- >' H` x ro w3 a s �o n =" cx o «0 ' - >EZ c °vmy =0 °� 3w o F m wp °too moo. °�� . oc 'a -Eav >ti� uo «b.�a:E' - OS � N ter°- Vi2 C . LaW b 9apL ns Nw a° N Vp �� a CE N O O OU_ ono uC a C c g u y❑ °- °`o -o �a� v-oE t E a« 03o ro�R9u3 �o CVuroip t �a cD °o E� iz a va °v a o a « ° . - .= •c 9 rovc« ° v E `6L 0 M 1^ O :a o p F '- o N 3'_ 3 d itl V C- a u Cl p� a � ° ro = C a a 9 b ° U CE , y.� O' �n d �:'. -CU �'�" � a � N N bN n a � V ma = -. N rat ` N CO C v a N = • n Oa - `d « O-o aE ro a °` NN c+ N a wE z > >b=vw as �. —n �v °3°-�`�a a >U - o� =,D UE mu D L �' o mu « av Z ' s .' n mo Orsw L3�? 3a 3 U o w�crn��ocsva ° RN D�v ' ^ cw E 9 ` «� rtN a ca a vroai v m '3 a� �' yo n o o �ro aosca c m'cwv vb vu a` 3« v v v y o rtu > mra �n ° ro a°� > U3vmp ..rt�auiv >=v �w yav c y p ro ciy� .nu ao�.. a ro — ac nc ° c 3' roEc�°cL z �v'°u o% ati s> _ Em - ocEpa o£O u n� � n o o m °'� s >x ' yu° ° ' ^ `o w of 7 `.2 a° v= �` ~o w E�t� � :YL ; aV o =c a u o o 'er c - ` c o - o ro a n n ro c� B.- v v a« o u v = �? c 3 I o, '. ro_ mom « o�,� 3L vs 2 ° Ev a °u op o o mR N° ° m «� av o U.S b >v3 0.0 oa' = Q U ov ma o = O F > =L« o �N «� W : S u ' `vo Ewm 2 wC :°-�ct 3s A> N_ =� }a°6L gw o - v '�' Eoa°' �E w z ° «oU `o av v '�D U v «row «.a ro.�y y-°b s a u o 2 „ 3 Om o «v vc «« cm sE �oa2� >t .a L ^wc id �� ..�ma a�;r ,u za �' b c Fu a F x �UV Q3w ° u�°£ �w 6 4E nv110 Ea 3 °a a a iO9 ou `� we '^ >� �i2 o 3 wa mo o'c� Wow rn',y s?E oL y —'.w ��u �� �E =v ~ ep z ° # O a - oc v v �.��c..c �. .Na�ro— o'a aai�a `w ba rtu a v3 Q a v O z ttv !� �o c,«y t — E �a > i ��a�ro- °oE rt v c On Z z 1-« o« 5/18/2010 5 -1 -1 c 50 �yAa ® � Z o r•• W 4 C ' , 0� n — ¢W O R. O t �] T� C U ❑u C,4 cn p z Z z U O 7 c l u� U�Ia " U vi EQ aQ A FM Q F w 0 W Cl) Ot u-o -1 ¢p azc F 0.1 w o r Y i �¢O z n ¢w��0 O y zOr1 oo�Z M Z�"P[1Q W UU�'N rzC7 �o z O cG q ao N z eUQ"'m Oa O op>. Q m m w O Q o z 0 7 Q a s v)¢> >O V nap ppF p z z aax ¢ Lu ¢ 7 O U Q O U oo CL z Of�rnOv� p[ —`Oz. p E- O UNJF.. C7pw ', C] = 5 ' 3 p _V X [7 twit Lo O 1� m O7 jO v O� �jjZ wm U Lu ¢�OvUi ww¢ ,r OO 0�?00 TU�U W [w. uW. �1PCQ Uzwz -x' :) F 3 Om ¢ o z ¢ Fp� F�WO —� OOww v^ o vz�� .� E �pG1 W c�pa SOW w C c n �F— L, w p P =OUOU� OO¢W u O �C) a °a U ,o v QFKP v vFiT0U pcwr.z�y zz'ZZ Zcd x[mil u: C]p W m �rn0 F [ rn O o LA WLo p OZ V P¢�v F i � w" coF U F W,C] V .� U pC]QO rn ¢z 0 �0V z W p Q 'Z. wQm 2 O Op��a zo¢w F J F U W W w U U T _ � P4 OF W U TFQwu. �zFOp Nmc�vc_ p m�¢ U Zz' Ta FZF�i aF,�Q¢ °'oa'o U UMMU °o . W, Q W U V' z ° ncv� F v�Oww v w s Oz0 Up?z W F pW M 0000m W QO�� v ° O U Q w W � O° o o Q U n x z 77-7- W 3 N zO — U N U U w ¢ o _ W N rn w U w¢wZ w�pu —N[�v ¢ mp> PCU OU �F UQ UNzm W Q F ° o V) Qz — W7 M 0 W Qzm T ° v�oaW Q 2FwO W Q wzFfA Ua,Fp F6 mmic p Ucn - 0. 5/18/2010 5 1 2 b 'IIVA .3O NMO1, `ONI'II3 (REHI I ° QVRHSNOI'I /'IIVA T NOME 1101 J0 RIM I I V J IHIHX5 ,P �IVA >I?JVW aNV� Q w w F LJ J Q m ETC) �— W (n 0 O U q o o 00'OOZ I C) / ti C l 1i0o18 f�( �53� a L 10l d0 i2jvd n , ' 0S l - o - s 3„EE,O4.68N ,OO L N 8'0 (14E 39bd 'E9E N008) M „LZ,6L.bON ,6L "44 93 ' 0'0'd (9NI-II3 (2JIHl OV-JHSNOIl /lIVA) 3„EE,O4.S8N S9'6S S3 S3d9b [S9Z "0] 6SZ 0 M „LZ,6L.bON ,00'S I. b3 - 3Ld15 O � L NOOIB M „££,04.585 ,00'91 o NLC� L 10� d0 12�b d 3 „LZ,61.40S 00W Zl 3 �d iNO`A lNOo� [,'L] 3 „ 1 1V LZ,6L.4 ZC 0S .ZO'SL 11 9NIMV38 H.LON31 71M1 Q� Q SNOISN71MO 0311V1d S3IVOIONI [,XX'XX] =310N 118V1 3NI1 rya °y,n a oya ° °5�� [3 „LL,05.LLN7 [A1"SOZ] [,60'4al] [,Z180Z7 [„Lo,91s] �� M „I4,6L.ZLS ,OCLOZ ,b8'EOI ,ECLOZ ,00 "OS9E „6E,SIS EO [3 „1 L,L57.1 [,09'5£7 [,SE'SZ] [,196£7 [ „9Z,Lb.06] 3„80,EZ.SZN SS'S£ LZ'SZ ,4S '6E 1 0056 „BZ,LE.06 Zo -f - [M „ZS,ZS.LIN] [,L9 LI] [,589] [,89'LI] e O L L 9NI iJV38 (INDHO OHOH0 1N30NV1 HION1 f11 l S m V1130 3ANM 318V1 3A2JH0 5/18/2010 5 -1 -3 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, an ordinance repealing and re- enacting Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, amending the approved development plan and requirements for site coverage, landscaping, setbacks, and gross residential floor area for Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, in accordance with Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a residential addition (patio enclosure) to the North side of Unit 8, Bishop Park, located at 63 Willow Place/ Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. PRESENTER(S): Rachel Friede ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, upon second reading. BACKGROUND: Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, was established by Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986. At that time, the purpose of the SDD was to allow for an increase in development potential while providing the public benefit of financial support for the public streamwalk. Since the establishment of SDD No. 15, there have not been any amendments to the SDD. On April 12, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission made a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, upon first reading (6 -0 -0). ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 6 Memo 051810 Ordinance No. 6 Attach A 051810 Ordinance No. 6 Attach A Exhibit A 050410 Ordinance No. 6 Attach B 051810 5/18/2010 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 18, 2010 SUBJECT: Second reading of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, to amend the approved development plan and requirements for site coverage, setbacks, and gross residential floor area, in accordance with 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a residential addition (patio enclosure) to the north side of Unit 8, Bishop Park, located at 63 Willow Place/ Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100012) Applicant: Douglas and Dhuanne Tansill, represented by K.H. Webb Architects Planner: Rachel Friede I. SUMMARY The applicants, Douglas and Dhuanne Tansill, represented by K.H. Webb Architects, are requesting a second reading of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, which is a major amendment to Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park. The major amendment increases site coverage, reduces setbacks and amends GRFA (to account for changes in GRFA calculation). The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, upon second reading. For reference, the following are attached: Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 (Attachment A) and the Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum dated April 12, 2010 including all attachments except the draft ordinance (Attachment B). II. BACKGROUND On April 12, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval, with conditions to the Vail Town Council for Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, by a vote of 4 -0 -2 (Viele and Paladino recused). The Commission recommended the following conditions: 1. Approval of this major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 15, Bishop Park, shall be contingent upon Town of Vail approval of the related design review application. 2. The applicant shall submit a site plan and landscape plan a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the first reading of the adopting ordinance by the Town Council to be included in the approved development plan of Special Development District No. 15. 3. Prior to the issuance of a temporary or final Certificate of Occupancy for this major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 15, Bishop Park, the applicant shall amend and record the Condominium Map for the Vail Village Plaza Condominiums, 1 5/18/2010 6 -1 -1 pursuant to Chapter 13 -6, Condominium and Townhouse Plats, Vail Town Code. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a fee -in -lieu for mitigation of employee housing, per Chapter 12 -24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The total amount shall be determined at the time of building permit issuance. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, upon first reading (6 -0 -0). III. ACTION REQUESTED Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, on second reading, the Vail Town Council should pass the following motion: "The Vail Town Council approves, with conditions, on second reading, Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, an ordinance repealing and re- enacting Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, amending and reestablishing the approved development plan and requirements for site coverage, setbacks, and gross residential floor area for special development district No. 15, Bishop Park, in accordance with 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a residential addition (patio enclosure) to the north side of Unit 8, Bishop Park, located at 63 Willow Place/ Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, on second reading, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Vail Town Council approve with the following conditions: 1. "Approval of this major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 15, Bishop Park, shall be contingent upon Town of Vail approval of the related design review application. 2. Prior to the issuance of a temporary or final Certificate of Occupancy for this major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 15, Bishop Park, the applicant shall amend and record the Condominium Map for the Vail Village Plaza Condominiums, pursuant to Chapter 13 -6, Condominium and Townhouse Plats, Vail Town Code. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a fee -in -lieu for mitigation of employee housing, per Chapter 12 -24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The fee shall be determined at the time of building permit issuance." Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, on second reading, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Vail Town Council makes the following findings: 1. That the amendment complies with the design criteria, based upon the review outlined in Staffs April 12, 2010, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission; and 2. That the amendment is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town, based upon the review outlined in Staffs April 12, 2010, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental 2 5/18/2010 6 -1 -2 Commission; and 3. That the amendment is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding areas, based upon the review outlined in StalTs April 12, 2010, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission; and 4. That the amendment does promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, and does promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality, based upon the review outlined in StalTs April 12, 2010, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission. VII. ATTACHMENTS A. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 B. PEC memo dated April 12, 2010 3 5/18/2010 6 -1 -3 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 6 SERIES OF 2010 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 13, SERIES OF 1986, TO AMEND THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE COVERAGE, SETBACKS, AND GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH 12- 9A -10, AMENDMENT PROCEDURES, VAIL TOWN CODE, TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION (PATIO ENCLOSURE) TO THE NORTH SIDE OF UNIT 8, BISHOP PARK, LOCATED AT 63 WILLOW PLACE/ LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 6, VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO WHEREAS, Section 12 -9A -10 of the Zoning Regulations permits major amendments to previously approved development plans for Special Development Districts; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to amend and re- establish Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, to amend the Approved Development Plan and development parameters, to allow for the construction of a proposed addition (patio enclosure); and WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the Special Development District is in the best interest of the town as it meets the Town's development objectives as identified in the Vail Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Zoning Regulations, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on April 12, 2010 on the major amendment application and has submitted its recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council by a vote of 4 -0 -2 (Viele and Paladino recused); and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, upon first reading, by a vote of 6 -0 -0, at a public hearing on May 4, 2010; and WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code have been sent to the appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 5/18/201a 6 -2 -1 Section 1. Purpose of the Ordinance Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, is hereby repealed and re- enacted by Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010. Section 2. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled, Planning Commission Report. The approval procedures described in Article 12 -9A of the Vail Town Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission for an amendment to the Development Plan for Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park. Section 3. Special Development District No. 15 Special Development District No. 15 (SDD 15) and the development plan therefore, are hereby approved as amended for the development of Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, Vail Village First Filing, within the Town of Vail, consisting of 0.7133 acres. Section 4. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, is hereby repealed and reenacted so that the language of Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, shall read as follows: Purpose Special Development District No. 15 (SDD 15) was established to ensure comprehensive development and use of an area that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town of Vail and to promote the upgrading and redevelopment of a property within the Town. The development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council and meets all design standards as set forth in the Vail Town Code. There are significant aspects of Special Development District 15 which cannot be satisfied through the imposition of the standards in the High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) District. SDD 15 is compatible with the upgrading and redevelopment of the community while maintaining its unique character Established Special Development District No. 15 (SDD 15) and the development plan therefore, are hereby approved as amended for the development of Lots 1 and 2, Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 5/18/2013 6 -2 -2 Block 6, Vail Village First Filing, within the Town of Vail, consisting of 0.7133 acres. Amendments Any amendments to SDD 15 shall follow the procedures and regulations outlined in Article 12 -9A, Vail Town Code. Permitted, Conditional and Accessory Uses Permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be set forth in the High Density Multiple Family District, per Article 12 -6H, Vail Town Code. Density - Dwelling Units The number of dwelling units shall not exceed twelve (12) dwelling units, including one (1) employee housing unit on -site. Density - Gross Residential Floor Area Since the adoption of Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, the method of calculation of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) has been amended and numerous "250 Additions" have been constructed. The total allowable GRFA on -site is 27,574 square feet. Development Plans The development plan for SDD 15 is approved and shall constitute the plan for development within the special development district. The development plan is comprised of certain plans adopted by Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986 as well as amended plans. The following plans were adopted by Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, and were submitted by Gordon Pierce, AIA, Architects and Berridge Associates, Inc., Landscaping Architects: 1. Elevations and sections by Gordon R. Pierce dated March 17, 1986 2. Preliminary landscape plan by Berridge Associates, Inc. dated March 17, 1986 Amended development plans submitted by K.H. Webb Architects, adopted by Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, are as follows, and included in Exhibit A of this Ordinance: 1. Site plan by K.H. Webb dated March 9, 2010 Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 5/18/201( 6 -2 -3 2. Floor plans by K.H. Webb dated March 9, 2010 Development Standards The development standards set out herein are approved by the Town Council. The development standards represent the existing structures within Bishop Park as of April 8, 2010, plus the amendments from Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010. Setbacks Setbacks are as built on the site plan adopted as part of the development plans. Height Maximum height shall be no greater than 44 feet. Site Coverage Site coverage shall not exceed 66% of the total site area. Landscaping Landscaping shall be a minimum of 56% of total site (with up to 20% hardscape counting towards landscaping requirement). Parking and Loading The minimum parking requirement is 29 underground parking spaces and 4 surface spaces for loading and delivery. Recreation Amenities Tax Assessed The recreational amenities tax shall be assessed for any additions at the time of issuance of building permit for the current rate set by the Town of Vail. Use Restriction Related to the Employee Housing Unit (formerly referred to as Manager's Unit) The employee housing unit, Unit No. 12, shall be restricted to employee housing as per Chapter 12 -13, Employee Housing, Vail Town Code. Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 5/18/2016 6 -2 -4 Additional Amenities and Approval Agreements for Special Development District No. 15. A. At the time of adoption of Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, the applicant, or his successor in interest, agreed to contribute $4,900 toward the construction of a bike pathway from Vail Road to Willow Bridge Road in the form of an unconditional letter of credit from a financial institution and in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney. A letter of credit was provided but per the provisions in Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986, the funds were released because construction of the bike pathway was not commenced within five (5) years of adoption. B. Upon issuance of a building permit for the additions proposed within Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, the applicant shall pay a fee -in -lieu for mitigation of employee housing for 22.1 square feet, per the adopted fee schedule established by the Vail Town Council. Time Requirements SDD No. 15 shall be governed by the procedures outlined in Article 12 -9A of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Should the addition proposed as part of the major amendment within Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 not commence within three years of the adoption of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010, Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 will be void, thus reinstating Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986. Section 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 6. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code as provided in th is Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 5/18/201h� 6 -2 -5 ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 7. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 4 th day of May, 2010, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 18 day of May, 2010, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 18 day of May, 2010. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk ATTACHED: EXHIBIT A Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2010 5/18/201 6 -2 -6 OrtlNnnic Nu. h. lyric. : _U I U f �hi3il CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR THESE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN BASED BISHOP PARK CON DOMINIU MS DRAWINGS PREPARED BY OTHERS AND HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED PROPOSED UNIT 8 ADDITION ° 172 & 49 SQ -FT. PER VAIL TOWN CODE 12 -15 -5 (250 ' I UNIT EXISTING — ORDINANCE) � § a 1054 SQ -FT. N UNIT - UNR 3 m >. 5 _� _ EST. 30% ABOVE GRADE - = EXIST. 316 GRFA ._ ''^ UNIT 8 " - \` 2 UNIT 2 UNR 3 G \ UNIT IM a SECTION AA SECTION BB SECTION CC °tF "" , 4 UNIT UNIT 7 UNIT 4 d , 332 SQ -FT. EST. O ^/, ABOVE a•' °" GRADE = 0 _ UNIT 4 5 UNIT3 327 SQ-FT. ,gE5T.O %ABOV oeE �..w. N �° C f-I GRADE= E / Ce G.CE. PARKING d �g SECTION OD - P�� Imo/ Y F m UNIT 1 I y',::`.R ^:;.I ,. a / • ' 1203SQ-FT. - -' " N UNIT I �/�• ,/ 14 EST. 15% ABOVE GRADE = 180 I • + ^* F 259 cO-FZ �., �,,,;� A ° _ "— — o - 9 o,ST.O %ABOVE GRADE = 0 UNIT UNIT 2 I 460 SQ -FT. 3415Q -FT. EST. O % ABOVE � ° EST. 0 %ABOVE G RA� G.C.E. PARAING I GRADE = D / 6A GAre. aG.as io —0 I Ps � "q UNIT PROPOSED _ (", ADDITION 22 5f3-FF__ 0g —_ G a r.r u T m P z� 1 P., r, ' " a PARKING LEVEL EXISTING PARKING LEVEL xe - �uxrt° UNIT 5 I ,. GRFA = 341 SQ -FT. fi ,g eMr� A, I 131S -FT. F <-i FLOOR PLANS AND SECTIONS BISHOF PARK PROPOSED PARKING LEVEL B �J C D E EST. 0% A B O VE O PAMNG LML GRFA CU. GRFA ADITION = 22 SQ -FT. A00 CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR THESE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN BASED BISHOP PARK CONDOMINIUMS ON DRAWINGS PREPARED BY OTHERS AND FIRST FLOOR GRFA= HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED 9.997 SQ - FT.- 806 EHU DEDUCTION = 9,191 SQ -FT. _O UNIT 8 m °s UNITS e _ 5 1000 SQ -FT. H m WT UNIT 5 UNIT 6 — a-1 UNIT B >, UNIT 12 �rA 806 SQ -FT. SECTION EE ... ". .,.. a SECTION FF UNIT 12 ` -oV,L Ye o UNIT 9 1037 SQ -FT. 11 ° �6p •o.m... R.w / i UNIT 9 O[1 UNIT w„ 1062 SQ - FT. UNIT 7 °, �•� - / G UNIT / H 1010 SQ - FT. C UNITS : UNIT 928 SQ-FT. a a ' 1490 SQ -FT. UNIT UNIT 3 919 SQ -FT. / UNIT ef� 1039 SQ -FT. A� I� °x•• I UNIT 6 / UNIT G.C.E. UNIT I � I UNIT '5 LEVEL ONE (PLAZA) A(J UNITS 85HOP PAR I -� -- - D — E 1 706 SQ - FT. FF FLOOR PLANS AND SECTIONS EV8IGRFAR B (� A002 CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR — — — — — THESE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN BASED BISHOP PAR} CONDOMINIUMS ON DRAWINGS PREPARED BY OTHERS AND HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED SECOND FLOOR GRFA= 11,380 SQ -FT. UNITE 10665Q - FT. M N -Tr uxrt Iz < n w�p UNITY UNIT 10 <,e.,.,« <• ❑ 2172 SQ -FT. r UNIT T \ a ry 1 uw.n were �! UNIT 10 SECTION GG 1468 SQ FT. 12025Q-FT. UNIT3 _ ,z G 960 SQ -FT. UNIT a <-, �. sa m 1;7 UNIT 3 B 996 SQ- FTNINCLUDES 25 UNIT U< SQ -FT. CEILING HT. > 16' 1196 SQ -FT. i . <••,<+ I i UNIT 6 onTE an.a. UNIT UNIT v 4 UN 6 UNIT 1 1692 SQ- FT.INCLUDES 48 1 , s I — • — SQ -FT. CEILING HT. > 16' °e -- LEVEL TWO B D E 628 IT -FT. F �" FLOOR PLANS AND SECTION �s2Gffaa - - - fff A003 CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR THESE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN BASED BISHOP PARK CONDOMINIUMS LEVEL NG ON DRAWINGS PREPARED BY OTHERS AND GRFA= EXISTING PARKING G HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED PROPOSED PARKING LEVEL GRFA ADDITION = 221( #B) +22( #2) SQ -FT. a FIRST FLOOR GRFA = , r ' � °• " s HH 9.191 SQ -FT. m SECOND FLOOR GRFA = I =• \ '- ,;s s 11,380 SO -FT. unR II urvr ? ). THIRD FLOOR GRFA = a 9 6.192 SO -FT. i .n.. ...� �..E G PROPOSED THIRD LEV 'z UNIT Io -T Io \ / `Ef GRFA ADDITION = 72( #2) 54-FT. • E .e...a .:. -:. he alr U NITS -� uNlr I2 ura UNIT II a° _ UNIT 11 :, 3239 SQ -FT. INCLUDES 36'. �❑ .. „ ° SQ -FT. CEILING HT. > 16' l s w.i s.3mMce /� TOTAL EXISTING BISHOP PARK GRFA = 27259 PROPOSED -27574 SECTION HH UNIT D 986 SQ -FT. INCLUDES 38 „ _� -- > ALLOWABLE GRFA FOR THE SQ -FT. CEILING HT. > 16' r Y9� j BISHOP PA 0.K COMPLEX PER SECTION 5 OF ORDINANCE 13 SERIES 1986 = 26,699 SQ -FT, BECAUSE THE BISHOP PARK C IC COMPLEX HAS EXCEEDED Q C E, I a E (� /� G THE ALLOWABLE GRFA UNIT 2 d UwT a I ! IS SUBMITTING THIS a 9 g ADDITION UNDER THE VAIL I N , / _ TOWN CODE 12-5 -5(250 F � ORDINANCE) I m UNIT 2 1106 5Q -FT. INCLUDES 22 SQ -FT. CEILING HT. > 16' UNIT 3 _ A� ".� UNIT �w,wxe ¢x 937 SQFT. INCLUDES 67 an as io UNR.2 P POSED SQ -FT. CEILING HT. > 16' i / ' ' W RO I / . 7 ADDITION 76 SO-FT UNIT 2 LEVEL THREE i AFI E BISHOP NIX C 0 E . I FLOOR PLANS AND SECTION REL313RFACUE A004 2 3 �G 2 7 o _ s � a c m 1 m z jl. I / 4� F O , g w J r O \ u e ms. ! 6(l &L\Lf'PPE T p ��ip� (y IMPR AYE KENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE �IVI %'IVC. L —�VV ¢lih1VY BISHOP PARK 'e,✓ = r TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Yc,IL. G 064RP OO 016 C- 05 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 12, 2010 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in site coverage, a reduction of the rear setback, and a reduction in landscaping, located at 63 Willow Place /Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100012) Applicant: Douglas and Dhuanne Tansill, represented by K.H. Webb Architects Planner: Rachel Friede I. SUMMARY The applicants, Douglas and Dhuanne Tansill, represented by K.H. Webb Architects, are proposing a major amendment to Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, that will increase site coverage, reduce the rear setback and reduce landscaping. The proposed major amendment will accommodate an addition to the north side of Unit 8 on the lower level and first floor. Staff is recommending approval, with conditions, of the applicant's proposal, based on the criteria established in Section VII of this memorandum. For reference, the following documents are attached: Vicinity Map (Attachment A), Draft Ordinance (Attachment B), Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986 (Attachment C), the Applicant's Request (Attachment D), architectural plans (Attachment E), a photograph of Unit 8 (Attachment F) and a rendering of the south side of Unit 8 (Attachment G). H. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park. The request includes: • Addition of 172 square feet to site coverage • Reduction of 172 square feet in landscaping (existing landscaping is an at -grade patio that counts as hardscape) • Reduction of the rear setback from 12 feet to 5.5 feet The applicant is requesting the major amendment to accommodate an addition of 221 square feet in total to Unit 8. The addition is being proposed on the north side of the building, infilling an existing at -grade patio with 172 square feet of GRFA, and also includes a 49 square foot addition of space that is currently part of the internal parking structure. This addition is considered a 250 Addition and does not require an amendment to the GRFA requirements of the Special Development District. No additional parking is proposed, and is not required. The applicant is required to pay a fee -in -lieu for mitigation of employee housing. With a 221 square foot addition of GRFA, the applicant shall provide payment at the time of building permit issuance for the current 5/18/2010 6 -4 -1 fee set for 22.1 square feet. No other mitigation of development impacts is proposed by the applicant or recommended by Staff. III. BACKGROUND Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, was established by Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1986. At that time, the purpose of the SDD was to allow for an increase in development potential while providing the public benefit of financial support for the public streamwalk. Since the establishment of SDD No. 15, there have not been any amendments to the SDD. IV. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zoning North: Gore Creek Outdoor Recreation South: Residential High Density Multiple Family East: Bishop Park Outdoor Recreation West: Residential Two - Family Primary /Secondary V. ZONING ANALYSIS Legal Description: Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1 Zoning: SDD No. 15, High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) District Lot Size: 0.7133 acres/ 31,071 square feet Development Allowed Allowed Proposed Net Change Standard HDMF District SDD No.15 Dwelling Units /Acre 25 units /acre 11 DU 11 DU No Change 17 units 1 EHU 1 EHU GRFA 76% of buildable 21,482 sq ft 250 Addition No Change to 23,613 sq ft +221 sq ft SDD language Site Coverage (max) 55% total site/ Existing: 64.7% 65.3% +172 sq ft 17,089 sq ft 20,113 sq ft 20,285 sq ft Landscaping (min) 30% total site/ 56% total site 56% total site -172 sq ft 9,321 sq ft 14,490 softscape 14,490 softscape hardscape 5,453 hardscape* 5,281 hardscape No change to 17,388 sq ft total 17,388 sq ft total ** total landscaping Front Setback 20 ft As built varies No Change No Change Side Setback 20 ft As built (varies) No Change No Change Rear Setback (at 20 ft 5.3 - 20 ft (varies) 5.5 — 9.5 ft -0.2 — 10.5 ft Unit 8 Required Parking 26 spaces 29 underground 29 underground No Change (min) 4 surface 4 surface Height (max) Sloping 48 ft As built No Change No Change Flat 45 ft * Hardscape can only count for up to 20% of total landscaping. 2,898 sq ft of hardscape counts towards landscaping * *Because hardscape counts for up to 20% of total landscaping, there is no change to the total landscaping. 5/18/2010 6 -4 -2 VI. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Land Use Plan (in part) 1.0 General Growth /Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources should be protected as the Town grows. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.4 The original theme of the old Village Core should be carried into new development in the Village Core through continued implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 5.0 Residential 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a full range of housing types. Vail Village Master Plan (in part) GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITYAND IDENTITY. Objective 1.1: Implement a consistent development review process to reinforce the character of the Village. Policy 1.1.1: Development and improvement projects approved in the Village shall be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and design considerations as outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan. Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan. Policy 1.2.2: Development and improvement projects shall be coordinated to minimize the unintended negative consequences associated with construction activity in a pedestrianized, commercial area. For instance, the noise abatement, project completion guarantees, temporary parking, traffic control, etc. 5/1 8/2010 6 -4 -3 WILLOW CIRCLE SUB -AREA ( #2) Although immediately adjacent to the mixed use developments found in the Commercial Core and Mixed Use sub - areas, the willow circle sub -area has retained an exclusively residential character. Condominium developments have occurred on all but one of the sub - area's parcels and many of these properties are actively "short- termed" to overnight guests. In most cases, parking has been provided in underground structures. This design feature, coupled with the Town -owned open space (Willow Circle Park), contributes to the pleasing appearance of this area. .1. In most cases, the levels of development -= - throughout this sub -area greatly exceed what is -AS's T allowed under existing zoning (High Density Multi- Family). Gross residential floor area 5�vr~ t ` ratios (GRFAR) range from .6 to 1.3, with an S t w r C eooa6 : V average of 1.01. With the exception of one parcel, all properties within this sub -area are, developed at, or over, their permitted levels of war development. As such, there is little development potential left in this sub -area. ��.�.� � � - Residential uses dominate this sub -area and are proposed to continue with the exception of one potential commercial space at the east end of the sub -area facing Willow Bridge Road. This concept is discussed further under Sub -Area 2.2. #1 -9 Study Area: Village Streamwalk Study of a walking only path along Gore Creek between the Covered Bridge and Vail Road, connecting to existing streamwalk, further enhancing the pedestrian network throughout the Village and providing public access to the creek. specific design and location of walkway shall be sensitive to adjacent uses and the creek environment. (Reference the Vail Recreational Trails Plan for additional information on this trail). Special emphasis on 3.4, 4.2. Title 12, Vail Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code Chapter 12 -1, Title, Purpose And Applicability (in part) Section 12 -1 -2: Purpose: A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, and to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes: 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. 5/1 8/2010 6 -4 -4 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off - street parking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with Municipal development objectives. 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the Town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. ARTICLE 12 -9A: SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT (SDD) DISTRICT (in part) 12 -9A -1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the Special Development District is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the Town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Special Development District, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the Special Development District. The Special Development District does not apply to and is not available in the following zone districts: Hillside Residential, Single- Family, Duplex, Primary /Secondary. The elements of the development plan shall be as outlined in Section 12 -9A -6 of this Article. 12 -9A -9: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverages, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the Town Council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the Town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on evaluation of the proposed special development district's compliance with the design criteria outlined in Section 12- 9A-8 of this Article. 12- 9A -10: AMENDMENT PROCEDURES: A. Minor Amendments: 1. Minor modifications consistent with the design criteria outlined in subsection 12 -9A -2 (definition of "minor amendment') of this Article, may be approved by the Department of Community Development. All minor modifications shall be indicated on a completely revised development plan. Approved changes shall be noted, signed, dated and filed by the 5/1 8/2010 6 -4 -5 Department of Community Development. 2. Notification of a proposed minor amendment, and a report of staff action of said request, shall be provided to all property owners within or adjacent to the special development district that may be affected by the amendment. Affected properties shall be as determined by the Department of Community Development. Notifications shall be postmarked no later than five (5) days following staff action on the amendment request and shall include a brief statement describing the amendment and the time and date of when the Planning and Environmental Commission will be informed of the staff decision. In all cases the report to the Planning and Environmental Commission shall be made within twenty (20) days from the date of the staffs decision on the requested amendment. 3. Appeals of staff decisions may be filed by adjacent property owners, owners of property within the special development district, the applicant, Planning and Environmental Commission members or members of the Town Council as outlined in Section 12 -3 -3 of this Title. B. Major Amendments: 1. Requests for major amendments to an approved special development district shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described in Section 12 -9A -4 of this Article. 2. Owners of all property requesting the amendment, or their agents or authorized representatives, shall sign the application. Notification of the proposed amendment shall be made to owners of all property adjacent to the property requesting the proposed amendment, owners of all property adjacent to the special development district, and owners of all property within the special development district that may be affected by the proposed amendment (as determined by the Department of Community Development). Notification procedures shall be as outlined in subsection 12 -3 -6C of this Title. VII. REVIEW CRITERIA The Vail Town Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating the merits of the proposed major amendment to a Special Development District. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. The Willow Circle neighborhood has similar multiple family condominium buildings to the Bishop Park SDD. Staff believes the patio infill does not create the perception of new bulk and mass and does not affect the character or visual 5/1 8/2010 6 -4 -6 integrity of the building. The proposed addition is located adjacent to Gore Creek, which serves as a buffer to adjacent buildings. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Staff believes the current uses, activity and density provide a compatible relationship with surrounding uses, which are similar in nature. Because uses and density (dwelling units per acre) are not changing, this proposal continues that compatibility. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 12 -10, Vail Town Code. Staff believes the proposal is in compliance with the parking requirements of the Vail Town Code. According to Chapter 12 -10, Vail Town Code, units between 500 and 2,000 square feet of GRFA require 2 parking spaces, and units over 2,000 square feet require 2.5 spaces. Based on this calculation, with 4 units requiring 2 spaces, and 8 units requiring 2.5 spaces, the total required parking spaces is 26 spaces. The property has 33 spaces. Unit 8 only requires 2 spaces and this addition would not shift their parking requirement to 2.5 spaces. D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan and Town policies. Staff believes that this application conforms with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, it meets the Vail Village Master Plans' "Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities ". In the sub area plan for the Willow Circle area in the Vail Village Master Plan, there is mention of the over development of this area. The plan also attributes the pleasant character of this neighborhood to underground parking and open space. The application continues to conform to these concepts. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and /or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. SDD No. 15 is located along Gore Creek, but development remains outside of the floodplain and stream setback. No other hazards are located in the vicinity. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The proposal calls for a decrease in landscaping, but only because the at -grade patio counts as hardscape, which can be up to 20% of total landscaping. However, Staff does not believe that this proposal will adversely effect the natural vegetation located adjacent to the property. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off -site traffic circulation. Staff believes this proposal does not adversely effect on -site or off -site traffic circulation. While a portion of the existing garage is proposed to be converted to 5/1 8/2010 6 -4 -7 GRFA, this will have no impact on the function of the garage. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. Staff believes the reduction of at -grade patio adjacent to open space will not have negative impacts on the adjacent natural features, views and functions. There is mature vegetation throughout the property and adjacent to Gore Creek that will screen the addition from view across the creek. I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Staff does not believe this criterion is relevant to this application as the proposal will only affect a portion of this project and does not require any further phasing or subdividing. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council for the applicant's request of a major amendment to Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in site coverage, a reduction of the rear setback, and a reduction in landscaping, located at 63 Willow Place /Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria described in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation for approval, with conditions, for this major amendment to a special development district, the Department of Community Development recommends the Commission pass the following motion: 'Based upon the review of the criteria described in Section V11 of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 12, 2010, and evidence and testimony presented at this hearing, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council for the applicant's request of a major amendment to Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, pursuant to Article 12 -9A, Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in site coverage, a reduction of the rear setback, and a reduction in landscaping, located at 63 Willow Place /Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation for approval, with conditions, for this major amendment to a special development district, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following conditions: 1. Approval of this major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 15, Bishop Park, shall be contingent upon Town of Vail approval of the 5/1 8/2010 6 -4 -8 related design review application. 2. The applicant shall submit a site plan and landscape plan a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the first reading of the adopting ordinance by the Town Council to be included in the approved development plan of Special Development District No. 15. 3. Prior to the issuance of a temporary or final Certificate of Occupancy for this major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) No. 15, Bishop Park, the applicant shall amend and record the Condominium Map for the Vail Village Plaza Condominiums, pursuant to Chapter 13 -6, Condominium and Townhouse Plats, Vail Town Code. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a fee -in -lieu for mitigation of employee housing, per Chapter 12 -24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The fee shall be determined at the time of building permit issuance. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of approval of this application, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission makes the following findings: 'Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 12, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. That the proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 15, Bishop Park, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12 -9A- 8, Vail Town Code. 2. That the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission, based upon the testimony and evidence presented, that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided. 3. That the request is consistent with the development goals and objectives of the Town." IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Draft Ordinance C. Applicant's Request D. Architectural Plans E. Photograph of Unit 8 F. Rendering of Unit 8 5/18/2010 6 -4 -9 Attachment A Bishop Park Condos Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 9 (63 Willow Place) Subject Site 4 I 17 413 20 t . 413 63 123 Land Use Village Master Plan 14 Low Density Residential A `•,\ •44 74 Medium Density Residential 1 A Ski Base - - `�.� •� �r - - �+ 114 17 - �t 413 122 /- 2Q ,> 413 ,r 103 Zoning commercial core 1 (cc1) 63 ' - commercial core 2 (CC2) �+ r Two-Family Primary /Secondary Residential (PS) 4 - High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) Public Accommodation (PA) _ Outdoor Recreation (OR) - Natural Area Preservation ("NAP) 14 Ski Base Recreation 2 (SBR -2) \ `\ 4 - 1oa General Use (GU) SDD 40 Special Development Districts e C Feet map escrea etl bythe TO of ��I$qe� ®ofihls mep5 oultl be orgenerel purposesonly The TO not ail tloes no arra the eca racy Oi he in ormation mnteinetl herein li JQ 10� (where shown, parcel ne work isapp —'i—, J0 Last Mod ified.Apn 6.2010 7mff m .' Attachment C ORDINANCE NO. 13 Series of 1986 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (KNOWN AS SDD NO. 15) AND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development districts within the Town; and WHEREAS, Ira C. Rothgerber, Jr. and the M.B. Trust have submitted an application for special development approval for a certain parcel of property within the Town known as Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, Vail Village 1st Filing, to be known as Special Development District 15; and WHEREAS, the establishment of the requested SDD 15 will insure unified and coordinated development within the Town of Vail in a manner suitable for the area in which it is situated; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has recommended approval of the proposed SDD; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate and beneficial to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants and visitors to establish said Special Development District No. 15; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE "TOWN'OF "VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled, Planning Commission Report. The approval procedures prescribed in Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the report of the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending approval of the proposed development plan for SDD 15. 5/18/2010 6 -4 -11 Section 2. Special Development District 15 Special Development District 15 (SDD 15) and the development plan therefore, are hereby approved for the development of Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, Vail Village First Filing, within the Town of Vail, consisting of 0.7133 acres. Section 3. Purpose Special Development District 15 is established to ensure comprehensive development and use of an area that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town of Vail and to promote the upgrading and redevelopment of a property within the Town. The development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council and meets all design standards as set forth in Section 18.40 of the Municipal Code. As stated in the staff memorandum dated • April 14, 1986, there are significant aspects of Special Development District 15 which cannot be satisfied through the imposition of the standards in the High Density Multiple Family zone district. SDD 15 is compatible with the upgrading and redevelopment of the community while maintaining its unique character. Section 4. Development Plan A. The development plan for SDD 15 is approved and shall constitute the plan for development within the special development district. The development plan is comprised of those plans submitted by Gordon Pierce, A.I.A., Architects and Berridge Associates, Inc., Landscape Architects and consists of the following documents: 1. Site plan by Gordon R. Pierce dated May 6, 1986 2. Preliminary landscape plan by Berridge Associates, Inc. dated March 17, 1986 3. Typical floor plans by Gordon R. Pierce dated March 17, 1986 4. Elevations and sections by Gordon R. Pierce dated March 17, 1986 5. Environmental Assessment and other submittal documents. B. The Development Plan shall adhere to the following: Setbacks Setbacks shall be noted as on the site plan listed above. Heig t Heights of structures shall be as indicated on the elevations listed above. -2- 5/18/2010 6 -4 -12 Coverage Site coverage shall be an indicated on the site plan listed above. Landscaping The area of the site to be landscaped shall be as indicated on the preliminary landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for their approval. The DRB- approved final landscape plan shall represent the landscaping requirements. Parking and Loadin Parking and loading shall be provided as indicated on the site plan and floor plans as listed above. In no case shall the parking provided on site be less than 29 spaces underground with 4 surface spaces provided for loading and delivery. Section 5. Density Approval of this development plan shall permit twelve (12) dwelling units, including one manager's unit, consisting of 21,482 square feet of gross residential floor area. As detailed on floor plans and elevations submitted by Gordon R. Pierce, dated March 17, 1986, the gross floor area as approved consists of 26,699 square feet. Section 6. Uses Permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be as set forth in the High Density Multiple Family zone district. Section 7. Use Restrictions Related to the Manager's Unit The manager's unit, unit no. 12, shall be restricted to employee housing as per Section 18.13.080 B.10 a -d of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Section 8. Amendments Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060. Amendments which do change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by Town Council after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development Department shall determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan. -3- 5/18/2010 6 -4 -13 Section 9. Expiration_ The applicant must begin construction of the special development district within 18 months from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward the completion of the project. If the applicant does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the special development district or any stage of the special development district within the time limits imposed by the preceding subsection, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the special development district. They shall recommend to the Town Council that either the approval of the special development district be extended, that the approval of the special development district be revoked, or that the special development district be amended. Section 10 Conditions of Approvals for Special Development District 15 The applicant, or his successor in interest, agrees to contribute $4,900 toward the construction of a bike pathway from Vail Road to Willow Bridge Road in the form of an unconditional letter of credit from a financial institution and in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any improvements for Special Development District 15 until such letter of credit has been filed with the Town. Said letter of credit shall be released and the applicant's obligation to contribute said funds shall terminate if construction is not commenced on the bike pathway within five (5) years from the date hereof. Section 11. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 12. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. _4_ 5/18/2010 6 -4 -14 Section 13. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS 6th DAY OF May 1986, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the 6th day of May , 1986 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 6th day of .Ma 1986. i Paul R. Jo,K ston, Mayor TTE T r Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ' in full this 17th day of �— , 1986. Paul R. Jq� Zon, Mayor ATTEST 6 ",rjw y j;4 � Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -5- 5/18/2010 6 -4 -15 O3.15.IQ Ehap Park Unit 8 Addition Vail Village We are proposing an addition of 221 square feet to Unit 8 in Bishop Park 171 square feet of the addition will be infiiling an existing deck on the creek side of the property at grade level. This space will be used for a new bedroom, and will be in line with the existing design aesthetics and standards. All macerials and windows will match the existing elements as closely as possible. There will also be an addition of 49 square feet in the form of a storage unit located next to the entrance to the unit at the parking garage level This addition will only be visible from the underground parking garage. The Planning Staff as a whole determined that the decrease in established setbacks (the building footprint as built being the setback) would put this application in the Major amendment to SDD category. Regards: Kyle Webb, AIA K.h. Webb Architects u WEST 110MSHEAD (IRM. $Oil[ A VAIL COLORADO SIM 910.411.2991 410 417.1965(II �rr_kAre✓3d�.ccm 5/18/201() q(,H &(t �1F bi AN'fRIiAN dNST1rh'tt Of ArfsJta(fS 6 -4 -16 0661 lit 016 1 15918 00tlUM '1116 I v On - 317677 0tl3NSNW I'M 01L MOM 'AiN1107 319VI i g 39tl111A 11VA 3)tlld M0111M 0 NOIlI00tl ' S IINn a q q a M q A8tld dOHSlB - 0 o s o a \\ Lri o a ' a� w E t a o w w w o Q � v w Q z aa � O C O 0 0 U Q o �u U 0� ¢QQQQQ w >_ C H z u J w g m Is �aY� Oo OF V7 r Z w t= 6u 00 M � O w za 1 Q u F = £ ¢ > O Z° o a Z w y¢ w0 OnHn" U rN W ti 3 mN 3T F oy BOO O NV CL Z z Y¢ xOYJv w r Z) A �£ Fs� i 3 0 =a zu e° wig oy z soot yd- Sm�gS w3� °Y ss p wg tl¢gyo LU o o o zga X34 2 d Z i 67S 9 2e 5g G Im W uJ Py � .,° �gg €��°� €F4 €°s a£° €E� V, o w3 pm �8 s3 Bs 5/18/2010 6 -4- 17 0661 lit 016 1 I5918 MUM '1116 I v On TIM MOW I'M Oil MOM AiNnol 319VI i g IDVVIA 11VA IDVld M0111M 0 c5 N011laGV 'S IINn q q a M q AM dOHSIO ¢ k \ ` k o6 7 5/18/2010 6 -4 -18 0661 lit 016 1 I5918 MUM '1116 I v On TIM MOW I'M Oil MOM AiNnol 319VI i g IDVVIA 11VA IDVld M0111M 0 N011laGV 'S IINn q q a M q AM dOHSIO F F 5/18/2010 6 -4 -19 0662 lit 016 1 15918 00tlUM '1116 I v On - 317677 0tl3NSNW I'M 01L MOM 'AiN1107 319VI i g 39tl111A 11VA 3)tlld M0111M 0 o O �d s NOIlI40tl`SllNfl a° q q a M q A8tld dOHSlB - 4x I 1- I I I x e 1 I I I I I z t I I I 3wLL:w I I I I Y I I I 1 11 r 1 111111. _ , w „ I I I I I I I 1 � - I E F 7- Z I I I Z I I o I � r x z I I � I N I I 2 4 - I I- I „ - I I I ck� 7 - I I I o �w Ell H E[] I I I w 1 I I w I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I W I i I I I I- r I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 6 I I I I I I ® ® I I I I- LL I, p I \ \ I I I: Z r _O r � - I > I + I I w I � x I � I � I O I Z I N � I X e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5,18/2010 6 -4 -20 066Z'IL6'ILA I IS 919 0 1010 IVA I V LINO - 317Y1] OV3NSN0fl LS3M OIL MOM 0110] 319V3 2 - 39VAA 11VA 3]tlld MO111M 19 a C'V N011laad `8 IIN(1 g q a M q 19d dOHS19 too m a tl' \ a, a " � J Z 0. t L f � — T. I H . - 4 I F� I =11 �i- } a M H 3 { 4 a e , _ LL W m s LI _ F � M o t i 1 Z _ t W 7 � Q I ^ w 1 — LU a 1 � W _ > LEE a — N 1 F x Q n 5/18/2010 6 -4 -21 0662 lit 016 1 15918 00tlUM '1116 I v On - 317677 0tl3NSNW I'M 01L MOM 'AiN1107 319VI i g _ IDVVIA 11VA 3)tlld M0111M 0 M o O y NOIlI00tl `8 IINn _ q q a M q A8tld d0HSl8 - a o � } N f Eu Oro Cy Li f E — = I E - 4 I i m — In a �n z - W a = Z a w, I 1 LL rr cox 01 Z W > I x Q - E a 5/18/2010 6 -4 -22 0661 lit 016 1 15918 00tlUM '1116 I v On - 317677 MOW I'M 01L MOM 'ON] 319VI i g 39V111A 11VA 39tl1d M0111M 19 a i o o� O y N011100tl `8 11Nf1 m w q q a M q A8tld dOHSlB - N � N W 4 r ° z - i — a ! y= r a � is LL C5 Z rn 1 tJ w _ — - w Cr w LU r a - w -- x ��— U Z H 0 2 rn o 5/18/2010 6 -4 -23 0661 lit 016 1 15918 00tlUM '1116 I v On - 3176'17 0tl3NSNW I'M 01L MOM 'AiN1107 319VI i g IDVVIA 11VA 3)tlld M0111M 0 L.f� O y NOIlI00tl `8 IINn _ w q q a M q A8tld d0HSl8 - M i I z i a u W In � o -. - __ -_.•- . 1 f Lj Ma �s u� � W - - - V V , W ❑ — _ fl <E m W S W _ V7 ❑ _. , ti _ F m W H � � o w , � J 2 W d 3 u LL t � 4 _ L 5/18/2010 6 -4 -24 F 4 1• t a i 1 Attachment F AWL.; I 4? i jig . . 46 � r 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, an ordinance repealing and re- enacting Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003, amending and reestablishing the approved development plan and density control requirements for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, in accordance with Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the conversion of meeting space to an accommodation unit at the Tivoli Lodge, located at located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/ Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. PRESENTER(S): Rachel Friede ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, upon second reading. BACKGROUND: On April 26, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, by a vote of 6 -0 -0. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, upon first reading (5 -0 -0). Due to a predetermined conflict of interest (Tivoli employment) Newbury recused herself from the item and let the Council Chambers. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 7 Memo 051810 Ordinance No. 7 Attach A 051810 Ordinance No. 7 Attach A Exhibit A 050410 Ordinance No. 7 Attach B 050410 5/18/2010 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 7 SERIES OF 2010 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE- ENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 12, SERIES OF 2003, AMENDING AND REESTABLISHING THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DENSITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 37, TIVOLI LODGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12- 9A -10, AMENDMENT PROCEDURES, VAIL TOWN CODE, TO ALLOW FOR THE CONVERSION OF MEETING SPACE TO AN ACCOMODATION UNIT AT THE TIVOLI LODGE, LOCATED AT LOCATED AT 386 HANSON RANCH ROAD/ LOT E, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE 5 FILING, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003 established Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, per the approved development plan submitted by Robert and Diane Lazier; and WHEREAS, Section 12 -9A -10 of the Zoning Regulations permits major amendments to previously approved development plans for Special Development Districts; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to amend and re- establish Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003, to amend the Approved Development Plan and density control requirements, to allow for the conversion of meeting space to an additional accommodation unit; and WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the Special Development District is in the best interest of the town as it meets the Town's development objectives as identified in the Vail Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Zoning Regulations, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on April 26, 2010 on the major amendment application and has submitted its recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council by a vote of 6 -0 -0; and WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code have been sent to the appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/2010 7 -1 -1 Attachment A NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Purpose of the Ordinance Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003, is hereby repealed and re- enacted by Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010. Section 2. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled, Planning Commission Report The approval procedures described in Article 12 -9A of the Vail Town Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission for an amendment to the Development Plan and density control requirements for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. Section 3. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003 is hereby repealed and re- enacted so that Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, reads as follows: Section 1. Special Development District No. 37 Established Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, is established for development on two parcels of land, legally described as Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5'h Filing, and Lot 3, First Amendment, Vail Village 5th Filing, which comprise a total of 22,760 square feet (0.5225 acres) in the Vail Village area of the Town of Vail. Said parcels may be referred to as "SDD No. 37 ". Special Development District No 37 shall be reflected as such on the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail. The underlying zoning for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be Public Accommodation (PA) District (Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5'h Filing) and Parking (P) District (Lot 3, First Amendment, Vail Village 5th Filing). Section 2. Development Plan An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities of a special development district. The Vail Town Council finds that the Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, complies with each of the requirements set forth in Sections 12 -9A -5 and 12 -9A -6 of the Town Code of Vail. The Approved Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/201( 7 -1 -2 Attachment A Development Plan for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be comprised of materials submitted in accordance with Section 12 -9A -5 of the Town Code of Vail and those plans prepared by Resort Design Associates International, entitled "Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan Office Copy, dated May 15, 2003." Amendments made by Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 are outlined in the plan prepared by Reslock and Sullivan, LLC entitled "Tivoli Lodge Page A2.0 dated as revised on Feburary 8, 2010" which are shown in Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010. Section 3. Development Standards In conjunction with the Approved Development Plan described in Section 2 herein, the following development standards are hereby approved by the Vail Town Council. These standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. The development standards for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge are described below: A. Permitted, Conditional, and Accessory Uses: The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed in Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be those uses listed in Sections 12 -7A -2, 12 -7A -3, and 12 -7A -4 of the Town Code of Vail, as may be amended. B. Lot Area: The minimum lot area for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be 22,760 square feet (0.5.225 acres). C. Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. D. Height: The maximum allowable building height for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge shall be fifty -six feet (56'), and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. E. Density Control: The maximum allowable Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be 27,901.5 square feet and the maximum allowable density shall be one (1) dwelling unit, sixty -two (62) accommodation units, and one (1) Type III Employee Housing Unit, and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/201( 7 -1 -3 Attachment A Development Plan, dated May 15, 2003. Said Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) shall be allocated as follows: a. Accommodation Units (62): 24,451 square feet b. Dwelling Unit (1): 3,000.5 square feet c. Type III Employee Housing Unit (1): 450.0 square feet F. Site Coverage: The maximum allowable site coverage shall be sixty -three percent (63 %) of the total lot area, and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. G. Landscaping and Site Development: At least thirty percent (30 %) or 5,312 square feet of the total lot area shall be landscaped. In no instance shall the hardscaped areas of the development site exceed twenty percent (20 %) of the minimum landscaped area. The landscaping and site development shall be as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. H. Parking and Loading: The minimum number of off - street parking spaces shall be forty (40) and the minimum number of loading and delivery bays shall be one (1), and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. Section 4. Conditions of Approval The conditions of approval required as part of Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2010, have been met. Specifically, the condition that the Developer provides deed - restricted housing that complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12 -13) for a minimum of one (1) employee on the Tivoli Lodge development site, and that said deed - restricted employee housing shall be made available for occupancy, and that the deed restrictions shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Tivoli Lodge were met. The required deed - restricted employee housing units shall not be eligible for resale and the units shall be owned and operated by the hotel and said ownership shall transfer with the deed to the hotel property. No other conditions shall be required as part of the amendments within Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 �' I s,' ?014 7 -1 -4 Attachment A Section 5. Amendments Any amendments to Special Development District No. 37 shall follow the procedures and regulations outlined in Article 12 -9A, Vail Town Code. Section 6. Time Requirements SDD No. 37 shall be governed by the procedures outlined in Article 12 -9A of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Should the addition proposed as part of the major amendment within Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 not commence within three years of the adoption of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 will be void, thus reinstating Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003. Section 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 6. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 7. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/201h� 7 -1 -5 Attachment A INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 4 th day of May, 2010, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 18 day of May, 2010, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 18 day of May 2010. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk ATTACHED: APPENDIX A Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 7 -1 -6 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 7 SERIES OF 2010 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE- ENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 12, SERIES OF 2003, AMENDING AND REESTABLISHING THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DENSITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 37, TIVOLI LODGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12- 9A -10, AMENDMENT PROCEDURES, VAIL TOWN CODE, TO ALLOW FOR THE CONVERSION OF MEETING SPACE TO AN ACCOMODATION UNIT AT THE TIVOLI LODGE, LOCATED AT LOCATED AT 386 HANSON RANCH ROAD/ LOT E, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE 5 FILING, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003 established Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, per the approved development plan submitted by Robert and Diane Lazier; and WHEREAS, Section 12 -9A -10 of the Zoning Regulations permits major amendments to previously approved development plans for Special Development Districts; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to amend and re- establish Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003, to amend the Approved Development Plan and density control requirements, to allow for the conversion of meeting space to an additional accommodation unit; and WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the Special Development District is in the best interest of the town as it meets the Town's development objectives as identified in the Vail Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Zoning Regulations, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on April 26, 2010 on the major amendment application and has submitted its recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council by a vote of 6 -0 -0; and WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code have been sent to the appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to amend Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/2010 7 -2 -1 Attachment A NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Purpose of the Ordinance Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003, is hereby repealed and re- enacted by Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010. Section 2. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled, Planning Commission Report The approval procedures described in Article 12 -9A of the Vail Town Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission for an amendment to the Development Plan and density control requirements for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. Section 3. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003 is hereby repealed and re- enacted so that Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, reads as follows: Section 1. Special Development District No. 37 Established Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, is established for development on two parcels of land, legally described as Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5'h Filing, and Lot 3, First Amendment, Vail Village 5th Filing, which comprise a total of 22,760 square feet (0.5225 acres) in the Vail Village area of the Town of Vail. Said parcels may be referred to as "SDD No. 37 ". Special Development District No 37 shall be reflected as such on the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail. The underlying zoning for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be Public Accommodation (PA) District (Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5'h Filing) and Parking (P) District (Lot 3, First Amendment, Vail Village 5th Filing). Section 2. Development Plan An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities of a special development district. The Vail Town Council finds that the Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, complies with each of the requirements set forth in Sections 12 -9A -5 and 12 -9A -6 of the Town Code of Vail. The Approved Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/2013 7 -2 -2 Attachment A Development Plan for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be comprised of materials submitted in accordance with Section 12 -9A -5 of the Town Code of Vail and those plans prepared by Resort Design Associates International, entitled "Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan Office Copy, dated May 15, 2003." Amendments made by Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 are outlined in the plan prepared by Reslock and Sullivan, LLC entitled "Tivoli Lodge Page A2.0 dated as revised on Feburary 8, 2010" which are shown in Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010. Section 3. Development Standards In conjunction with the Approved Development Plan described in Section 2 herein, the following development standards are hereby approved by the Vail Town Council. These standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. The development standards for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge are described below: A. Permitted, Conditional, and Accessory Uses: The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed in Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be those uses listed in Sections 12 -7A -2, 12 -7A -3, and 12 -7A -4 of the Town Code of Vail, as may be amended. B. Lot Area: The minimum lot area for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be 22,760 square feet (0.5.225 acres). C. Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. D. Height: The maximum allowable building height for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge shall be fifty -six feet (56'), and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. E. Density Control: The maximum allowable Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be 27,901.5 square feet and the maximum allowable density shall be one (1) dwelling unit, sixty -two (62) accommodation units, and one (1) Type III Employee Housing Unit, and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/201( 7 -2 -3 Attachment A Development Plan, dated May 15, 2003. Said Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) shall be allocated as follows: a. Accommodation Units (62): 24,451 square feet b. Dwelling Unit (1): 3,000.5 square feet c. Type III Employee Housing Unit (1): 450.0 square feet F. Site Coverage: The maximum allowable site coverage shall be sixty -three percent (63 %) of the total lot area, and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. G. Landscaping and Site Development: At least thirty percent (30 %) or 5,312 square feet of the total lot area shall be landscaped. In no instance shall the hardscaped areas of the development site exceed twenty percent (20 %) of the minimum landscaped area. The landscaping and site development shall be as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. H. Parking and Loading: The minimum number of off - street parking spaces shall be forty (40) and the minimum number of loading and delivery bays shall be one (1), and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. Section 4. Conditions of Approval The conditions of approval required as part of Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2010, have been met. Specifically, the condition that the Developer provides deed - restricted housing that complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12 -13) for a minimum of one (1) employee on the Tivoli Lodge development site, and that said deed - restricted employee housing shall be made available for occupancy, and that the deed restrictions shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Tivoli Lodge were met. The required deed - restricted employee housing units shall not be eligible for resale and the units shall be owned and operated by the hotel and said ownership shall transfer with the deed to the hotel property. No other conditions shall be required as part of the amendments within Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/2016 7 -2 -4 Attachment A Section 5. Amendments Any amendments to Special Development District No. 37 shall follow the procedures and regulations outlined in Article 12 -9A, Vail Town Code. Section 6. Time Requirements SDD No. 37 shall be governed by the procedures outlined in Article 12 -9A of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Should the addition proposed as part of the major amendment within Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 not commence within three years of the adoption of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 will be void, thus reinstating Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003. Section 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 6. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 7. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/201h� 7 -2 -5 Attachment A INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 4 th day of May, 2010, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 18 day of May, 2010, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 18 day of May 2010. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk ATTACHED: APPENDIX A Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 5/18/201 7 -2 -6 W N i 0 D II II II II I - II �I I II _s II II II I I II II II � II D I I I I I I I I� I YJ (1 - O 10 O n V1 O -FT i� Hill Hill Hill I IF �71 L l �D O rn 0 O Z �r rn = G rn r rn R Si °`k s °il'�n' L.L.c. TIVOLI LODGE n PPDLIry D�J�F 3r% HAN50N RANCH RD. r r v y cc son3e LOT E, BLK, 2, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING !,Ndharn F. Restock ALA. 0 VAIL, COLORADO A �nitP�t MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 26, 2010 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to a Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to amend Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, to add one accommodation unit and remove meeting space, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/ Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5 Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100013) Applicant: Robert Lazier Planner: Rachel Friede I. SUMMARY The applicant, Robert Lazier, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, to allow for a conversion of unfinished meeting room space to an accommodation unit (hotel room). Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's proposal, based on the criteria established in Section VII of this memorandum. For reference, the following documents are attached: Vicinity Map (Attachment A), Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003 (Attachment B), draft Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 (Attachment C) and architectural plans (Attachment D). II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. The request includes: • Conversion of 891 square feet of designated meeting space into a hotel room, resulting in the following changes to the SDD language: • Amendments to the density control section, including increase from 61 accommodation units to 62 accommodation units, increase of total GRFA from 27,010.5 square feet to 27,901.5, and an increase of AU GRFA from 23,560 square feet to 24,451 square feet. • No changes to number of parking spaces III. BACKGROUND Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, was established by Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003. The SDD allowed for increased height, loading and delivery in the front setback and a reduction in landscaping. The Tivoli Lodge provided one on -site employee housing unit, streetscape improvements, a paved walkway on Hanson Ranch Road and paid a transportation impact fee for increased vehicle trips. The Tivoli Lodge received their certificate of occupancy in 2005. No changes have been made to the Tivoli Lodge since it opened. 1 5/18/2010 7 -4 -1 IV. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Zoning North: Residential Public Accommodations South: Open Space Agriculture and Open Space East: Residential Public Accommodations West: Open Space Agriculture and Open Space V. ZONING ANALYSIS Legal Description: Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5 th Filing Zoning: SDD No. 37, Public Accommodations (PA) District Lot Size: 27,620 square feet/ 0.5225 acres Development Allowed Allowed Proposed Net Change Standard PA District SDD No. 37 Dwelling Units /Acre 25 DU /acre 1 DU 1 DU +1 AU unlimited EHU, 61 AU 62 AU AU, FF /TS 1 EHU 1 EHU GRFA (max) 41,430 sq ft 27,010.5 sq ft 27,901.5 sq ft +891 sq ft Site Coverage max 65 %/ 17,953 s ft 63% 63% No change Landscaping (min) 30 %/ 8,286 sqft 30% 30% No change Setbacks 20 feet Per approved plan Per approved plan No change Parking (min) 47 spaces* 40 spaces 40 spaces* No change Height (max) Sloping roof 56 feet 56 feet No change 48 feet *The proposed conversion of meeting space to an AU reduces the required parking calculation by 1 space. No additional spaces proposed but deviation between SDD and required parking will be reduced. VI. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Vail Land Use Plan (in part) 1.0 General Growth /Development 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 3.0 Commercial 3.1. The hotel bed base should be preserved and use more efficiently. 3.2. The Village and Lionshead areas the best location for hotels to serve the future needs of destination skiers. 3.3. Hotels are important to the continued success of the Town of Vail, therefore conversion to condominiums should be discouraged. 3.4. Commercial growth should be concentrated in existing commercial areas to accommodate both local and visitor needs. 2 5/18/2010 7 -4 -2 Vail Village Master Plan (in part) GOAL #2 : TO FOSTER A STRONG TOURIST INDUSTRY AND PROMOTE YEAR - AROUND ECONOMIC HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE VILLAGE AND FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. Objective 2.3: Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations. Policy 2.3.1: The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term overnight rental. Obiective 2.5 Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. EAST VILLAGE, SUB -AREA ( #7) 6 1 eAwNMOU688 `j' y j 1 C • ' ,� \.Cun wear. 7 � � �� . -, I �� _; ' . y 1 5 -A4.k SE.48gNSy' . i 1 r /i \HATPA�ih..� r The East Village sub -area is comprised almost exclusively of residential /lodging and condominium development. The sub -area separates the commercial activity of the Village Core on the west with the Golden Peak Ski Base /Recreation area on the east. While there is vehicular traffic through the sub -area, Hanson Ranch Road, Gore Creek Drive, and Vail Valley Drive also accommodate a great deal of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The most important public improvements in this sub -area relate to pedestrian and bicycle safety. The public right -of- -way; should be maintained and expanded for public use whenever possible There are locations throughout the sub -area that have the potential to accommodate small residential /lodging infill development. A number of the parcels identified: for infill development are now used for surface parking. A key objective for any infill development is to replace existing surface parking with buildings and landscape /site improvements. The parking lost by the development of the site, as well as the new parking required for the additional development must be accommodated on site. 3 5/1 8/2010 7 -4 -3 With the exception of one parcel, there are no significant development rights remaining in this sub -area. Existing development levels range from 22 to 80 units per acre with an average GRFAR of .92. The likelihood of an infill development proposal being approved will be based on the project's ability to satisfy the goals, objectives and policies of this plan and other zoning and development standards. Development or redevelopment of this sub area will attract additional traffic and population into this area and may have significant impacts upon portions of sub -areas 6 and 10. #7 -2 Tivoli Lodge Infill (Complete) Small lodging infill over parking area off of the existing lodge. Mass of building to "step down" from existing structure. A key issue related to this potential development is accommodating on -site parking for new demand created and the spaces lost by the infill of the existing lot. Title 12, Vail Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code Chapter 12 -1, Title, Purpose And Applicability (in part) Section 12 -1 -2: Purpose: A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, and to promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that will conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of high quality. B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes: 1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities. 2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and other dangerous conditions. 3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to lessen congestion in the streets. 4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off - street parking and loading facilities. 5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic values. 6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with Municipal development objectives. 7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with structures. 8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the Town. 9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable natural features. 10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters. 11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community. ARTICLE 12 -9A: SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT (SDD) DISTRICT (in part) 12 -9A -1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the Special Development District is to encourage flexibility and 4 5/1 8/2010 7 -4 -4 creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new development with the Town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Special Development District, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the Special Development District. The Special Development District does not apply to and is not available in the following zone districts: Hillside Residential, Single- Family, Duplex, Primary/Secondary. The elements of the development plan shall be as outlined in Section 12 -9A -6 of this Article. 12 -9A -9: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverages, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the Town Council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Before the Town Council approves development standards that deviate from the underlying zone district, it should be determined that such deviation provides benefits to the Town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. This determination is to be made based on evaluation of the proposed special development district's compliance with the design criteria outlined in Section 12- 9A-8 of this Article. 12- 9A -10: AMENDMENT PROCEDURES: B. Major Amendments: 1. Requests for major amendments to an approved special development district shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described in Section 12 -9A -4 of this Article. 2. Owners of all property requesting the amendment, or their agents or authorized representatives, shall sign the application. Notification of the proposed amendment shall be made to owners of all property adjacent to the property requesting the proposed amendment, owners of all property adjacent to the special development district, and owners of all property within the special development district that may be affected by the proposed amendment (as determined by the Department of Community Development). Notification procedures shall be as outlined in subsection 12 -3 -6C of this Title. VII. REVIEW CRITERIA The Vail Town Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating the merits of the proposed major amendment to a Special Development District. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. 5 5/1 8/2010 7 -4 -5 A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation. Staff believes that this application is compatible and sensitive to the immediate environment, neighborhoods and adjacent properties, as the design of the building will not change with this proposal. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Staff believes that the proposed addition of one accommodation unit provides a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activities. There is a need for more hot beds in this neighborhood, and this addition will help supply this need. The addition of a hotel room improves the workable relationship between this building, surrounding buildings, and the nearby ski mountain. The neighborhood has similar uses and density, which is compatible with the Tivoli Lodge. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 12 -10, Vail Town Code. At the establishment of this SDD, a reduction in parking was provided, allowing 40 spaces instead of 48 spaces as required by Chapter 12 -10, Vail Town Code. Typically, when changes of use applications come in, parking is assessed for the change in use and not for the entire project. The former use of meeting space required 1 space per 330 square feet of seating area, or approximately 2 spaces. The accommodation unit requires 0.7 parking spaces. Therefore, there is a decrease in required parking, per Chapter 12 -10, Vail Town Code. There is also a decrease in the deviation between required parking and the SDD parking spaces. D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan and Town policies. Staff believes that this application complies with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan and Town policies. Specifically, the application complies with the Vail Village Master Plan, as "the development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged." Further, this application meets the goals of the Vail Land Use Plan, including accommodating "most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas)." The Vail Land Use Plan also calls for hotels to be located in Vail Village and Lionshead, which this application continues to do. Because this proposal is a conversion of commercial uses, no mitigation of employee housing is required. Staff believes that no further mitigation of development impacts should be required for this application because of the positive impacts of increased AU in Vail Village. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and /or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. Staff believes that the proposal is in compliance with this criteria, as there are no natural or geologic hazards that need to be mitigated. 6 5/1 8/2010 7 -4 -6 F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Staff believes that this proposal is in compliance with this criteria, as there are no changes to site plan, building design and location, all of which already comply with the criteria. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off -site traffic circulation. Staff believes that this proposal complies with this criteria, as the circulation system that is designed for both vehicles and pedestrians will not be effected. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. Staff believes that this application complies with this criteria, as landscaping and open space, both of which are not affected by this application, are already optimizing and preserving natural features, recreation, views and functions. I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Staff believes that this criteria is not applicable, as there is no phasing plan or subdivision plan to be enacted as part of this project. VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for the applicant's request for a major amendment to a Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to amend Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, to add one accommodation unit and remove meeting space, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/ Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5 th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria described in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation for approval, with conditions, for this major amendment to a special development district, the Department of Community Development recommends the Commission pass the following motion: `Based upon the review of the criteria described in Section V11 of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 26, 2010, and evidence and testimony presented at this hearing, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council for the applicant's request for a major amendment to a Special Development District, pursuant to Section 12- 9A -10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to amend Special Development 7 5/1 8/2010 7 -4 -7 District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, to add one accommodation unit and remove meeting space, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/ Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5' Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission forward a recommendation of approval of this application, the Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission makes the following findings: "Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section Vll of this Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 26, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. That the proposed major amendment to Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, complies with the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12 -9A- 8, Vail Town Code. 2. That the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission, based upon the testimony and evidence presented, that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided. 3. That the request is consistent with the development goals and objectives of the Town." IX. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003 C. Draft Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010 D. Architectural Plans 8 5/1 8/2010 7 -4 -8 - GOCRIEI(pR „}, 1 i� 4�y w y 9 r 0 Or hL N � �- ORDINANCE NO. 12 Series of 2003 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 37, TIVOLI LODGE, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE A, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT (SDD) DISTRICT, CHAPTER 9, TITLE 12, ZONING TITLE, TOWN CODE OF VAIL, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Title 12, Zoning Title, Chapter 9, Article A, Special Development (SDD) District, Town Code of Vail establishes a procedure for establishing special development districts; and WHEREAS, Robert & Diane Lazier have submitted an application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department to establish Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, to facilitate the redevelopment of an existing lodge; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail held a public hearing on April 28, 2003, on the application to establish Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, in accordance with the provisions of the Town Code of Vail; and WHEREAS, upon due consideration, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail finds that the request complies with the design criteria prescribed in the Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, and furthers the development objectives of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has forwarded a recommendation of approval by a vote of 6 -1 (Lamb Opposed) of this request to the Vail Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that that the request to establish Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, complies with the design criteria prescribed in the Title 12, Zoning Title, Town Code of Vail; and provides a harmonious, convenient, workable Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 1 5/18/2010 7 -4 -10 • • • relationship among land uses consistent with municipal development objectives; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare to adopt Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2003, and establish a new special development district in the Town of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. District Established Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, is established for development on two parcels of land, legally described as Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5' Filing, and Lot 3, Firs m First Amendment, Vail Village 5 Filing, comprise a 9 p total of 22,760 square feet (0.5225 acres) in the Vail Village area of the Town of Vail. Said parcels may be referred to as "SDD No. 37 ". Special Development District No 37 shall be reflected as such on the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vail. The underlying zoning for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be Public Accommodation (PA) District (Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5 th Filing) and Parking (P) District (Lot 3, First Amendment, Vail Village 5 th Filing). Section 2. Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, Approved Development Plan An approved development plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses and activities of a special development district. The Vail Town Council finds that the Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, complies with each of the requirements set forth in Sections 12 -9A -5 and 12 -9A -6 of the Town Code of Vail. The Approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be comprised of materials submitted in accordance with Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 2 5/18/2010 7 -4 -11 Section 12 -9A -5 of the Town Code of Vail and those plans prepared by Resort Design Associates International, entitled " Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan Office Copy" dated May 15, 2003. Section 3. Development Standards In conjunction with the Approved J ed Develo m pp Development Plan described in Section 2 herein, the following development standards are hereby approved by the Vail Town Council. These standards are incorporated in the Approved Dev P elo ment Plan to r pP p protect the integrity of 9 Y the development of Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge. The development standards for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge are described below: A. Permitted, Conditional, and Accessory Uses: The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses allowed in Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be those uses listed in Sections 12 -7A -2, 12 -7A -3, and 12 -7A -4 of the Town Code of Vail, as may be amended. B. Lot Area: The minimum lot area for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be 22,760 square feet (0.5.225 acres). C. Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. D. Height: The maximum allowable building height for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge shall be fifty -six feet (56'), and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. E. Density Control: The maximum allowable Gross Residential Floor Area Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 3 5/18/2010 7 -4 -12 • • • (GRFA) for Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, shall be 27,010.5 square feet and the maximum allowable density shall be one (1) dwelling unit, sixty -one (61) accommodation units, and one (1) Type III Employee Housing Unit, and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, dated May 15, 2003. Said Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) shall be allocated as follows: • Accommodation Units (61) - 23,560.0 square feet • Dwelling Unit (1) - 3,000.5 square feet • Type III Employee Housing Unit (1) - 450.0 square feet Total 27,010.5 square feet F. Site Coverage: The maximum allowable site coverage shall be sixty - three percent (63 %) of the total lot area, and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. G. Landscaping and Site Development: At least thirty percent (30 %) or 5,312 square feet of the total lot area shall be landscaped. In no instance shall the hardscaped areas of the development site exceed twenty percent (20 %) of the minimum landscaped area. The landscaping and site development shall be as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. H. Parking and Loading: The minimum number of off - street parking spaces shall be forty (40) and the minimum number of loading and delivery bays shall be one (1), and as indicated on the Tivoli Lodge Approved Development Plan, described in Section 2 herein. Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 4 5/18/2010 7 -4 -13 Section 4. Conditions of Approval The Developer, agrees to comply to the following conditions of approval, which shall be part of the Town's approval of the establishment of Special Development District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge: 1. That the Developer provides deed - restricted housing that complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12 -13) for a minimum of one (1) employee on the Tivoli Lodge development site, and that said deed - restricted employee housing shall be made available for occupancy, and that the deed restrictions shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Tivoli Lodge. The required Type III deed - restricted employee housing units shall not be eligible for resale and that the units be owned and operated by the hotel and that said ownership shall transfer with the deed to the hotel property. 2. That the Developer meets with the Town staff and prepares a memorandum of understanding outlining the responsibilities and requirements of the required off -site improvements, prior to second reading of the ordinance approving the establishment of Special Development District No 37, Tivoli Lodge. This memorandum of understanding shall include, but not be limited to, all streetscape improvements along Vail Valley Drive and Hanson Ranch Road, in accordance with the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan. 3. That the Developer submits a final exterior building materials list, typical wall section, architectural specifications, and a complete color rendering for review and approval of the Design Review Board, prior to submitting a building permit application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department.. 4. That the Developer submits a comprehensive sign program proposal for the Tivoli Lodge for review and approval by the Design Review Board, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the project. Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 5 5/18/2010 7 -4 -14 t • • 5. That the Developer submits a rooftop mechanical equipment plan for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior to submitting a building permit application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into the overall design of the hotel and enclosed and visually screened from public view. 6. That the Developer posts a bond to provide financial security for the 150% of the total cost of the required off -site public improvements. The bond shall be in place with the Town prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy. 7. That the Developer complies with all fire department staging and access requirements pursuant to Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code. This will be demonstrated on a Construction Staging plan for Town review and approval prior to submitting a building permit application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department. 8. That the Developer submits a written letter of approval from the utility companies permitting encroachments into the platted utility easements prior to submitting a building permit application to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for this project. 9. That the Developer provides a 6 ft. to 8 ft. heated concrete unit paver pedestrian walkway from the intersection of Vail Valley Drive, north the intersection of Vail Valley Drive and Hanson Ranch Road, then west to the westernmost property line of Tract A, Vail Village Fifth Filing. All work related to providing these improvements including street lights, retaining walls, utility relocation, curb and gutter, drainage and landscaping shall be included. A plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town and the Design Review Board prior to submittal of a building permit. The applicants shall submit civil drawings depicting said off -site improvements to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for this project. Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 6 5/18/2010 7 -4 -15 10. That the Developer shall prepare and submit all applicable roadway and drainage easements for dedication to the Town for review and approval by the Town Attorney. All easements shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. 11. That the Developer shall be assessed an impact fee of $5,000 for the net increase in p.m. traffic generation as determined by the Town of Vail Public Works Department, as addressed in attachment F of the memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission, dated April 28, 2003. 12. That the Developer shall provide detailed civil plans, profiles, details, limits of disturbance and construction fence for review and civil approval by the Department of Public Works, prior to submittal of a building permit. 13. That the approval of the conditional use permits is not valid unless an ordinance approving the associated special development district amendment request is approved on second reading. 14. That the Developer shall commence initial construction of the Tivoli Lodge within three years from the time of its final approval at second reading of the ordinance establishing Special Development District No. 37, and continue diligently toward the completion of the project. If the Developer does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the special development district or any stage of the special development district within the time limits imposed, the approval of said special development district shall be void. The Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council shall review the special development district upon submittal of an application to reestablish the special development district following the procedures outlined in Section 12 -9A -4, Vail Town Code. 15. That the Developerts revises the proposed landscape plan to increase the amount of softscape area on the development site prior to submitting the plans to the Design Review Board for final review. The revised landscape plan shall be Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 7 5/18/2010 7 -4 -16 reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. In no instance, however, shall the amount of softscape area decrease below 80% of the total landscape area requirement. 16. That the Developer submits a tree protection plan prepared by a Certified Consulting Arborist to the Design Review Board for review and approval prior to final approval by the Board of the proposed project. Upon acceptance of the tree protection by the Design Review Board, the Developer shall submit a written agreement between the applicants and their contractor, to the Town of Vail Community Development, stating that all mitigation measures recommended by the Certified Consulting Arborist will be implemented and strictly adhered to by the applicants and their contractors throughout the duration of the construction process. The written agreement shall be approved and accepted prior to the issuance of a building permit for this project. 17. That the Developer addresses the written final comments of the Town of Vail Public Works Department outlined in the memorandum to George Ruther from the Town of Vail Public Works Department, dated April 24, 2003, prior to submitting an application to the Town of Vail Community Department for the issuance of a building permit for this project. Section 5. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Vail Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 6. The Vail Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 8 5/18/2010 7 -4 -17 • • ! and the inhabitants thereof. The Council's finding, determination and declaration is based upon the review of the criteria prescribed by the Town Code of Vail and the evidence and testimony presented in consideration of this ordinance. Section 7. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 8. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 20' day of May, 2003 and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 3 1 day of June, 2003, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. urz, Wayor ATTE 4Donaldson, SEAL rele Town Clerk c ol OR READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 3r day of Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 9 5/18/2010 7 -4 -18 i oF�,�� June, 2003. SEAL Ludwig Kurz, qayor ATTIE L-e Kelei donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 12, Series 2003 1 0 5/18/2010 7 -4- 19 �� ro D II II II II I 11 - - I II �I I II "s II II II I I II II II � II 11 I I 1� IF D I I I I I I I I� I YJ n - O I 10 IF O n V1 O D � �; Lj �D O rn 0 O Z �r rn = G rn r rn R Si °`k s °il'�n' L.L.c. TIVOLI LODGE n PPDLIry D�J�F 3r% HAN50N RANCH RD. r r v y cc son3e LOT E, BLK, 2, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING !William F. Restock ALA. 0 VAIL, COLORADO A �nitP�t Q I I I I I I I I I � III I I I 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I 1 0 9 Do ® noo I I I I I I �D z I IL 9- u x = U R' z � OrT OrT L' � I � O I R Si °`k s °ii'�n L.L.C. TIVOLI LODGE n PF -D!N f��J�F 3B6 HAN50N RANCH RD. yr rra cc son3e — — LOT E, BLK, 2, VAIL VILLAGE FIFTH FILING VAIL, COLORADO �dharn F. Redo, k, A.LA. Architect 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Section 12- 14 -20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, to allow for the extension of the commercial core temporary construction signage for businesses and setting forth details in regard thereto. PRESENTER(S): Rachel Friede ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon second reading. BACKGROUND: On May 3, 2005, the Town Council adopted Section 12- 14 -20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, through Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2005. These regulations facilitated the installation of temporary construction mitigation signs and fencing within the Town's commercial areas to lessen the impact of redevelopment construction on the Town's businesses, residents, and guests. These regulations were originally set to expire on April 1, 2008, but were extended to April 1, 2010 by Ordinance No. 4, Series of 2008. On April 26, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010 by a vote of 6 -0 -0. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon first reading (6 -0 -0). ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 8 Memo 051810 Ordinance No. 8 Attach A 051810 5/18/2010 MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 18, 2010 SUBJECT: Second reading of ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Section 12- 14 -20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, to allow for the extension of the commercial core temporary construction signage for businesses and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Friede I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting a second reading of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, for proposed text amendments to Section 12- 14 -20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, to allow for the extension of the commercial core temporary construction signage for businesses and setting forth details in regard thereto. The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon second reading. Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010 is attached for reference (Attachment A). II. BACKGROUND On May 3, 2005, the Town Council adopted Section 12- 14 -20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, through Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2005. These regulations facilitated the installation of temporary construction mitigation signs and fencing within the Town's commercial areas to lessen the impact of redevelopment construction on the Town's businesses, residents, and guests. These regulations were originally set to expire on April 1, 2008, but were extended to April 1, 2010 by Ordinance No. 4, Series of 2008. On April 26, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010 by a vote of 6 -0 -0. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon first reading (6 -0 -0). III. REQUESTED ACTION Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon second reading, the Community Development Department recommends the Town Council pass the following motion: 1 5/18/2010 8 -1 -1 "The Town Council approves, on second reading, Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Section 12- 14 -20, Commercial Core Construction, Vail Town Code, to allow for the extension of the commercial core temporary construction signage for businesses and setting forth details in regard thereto. " Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010, upon second reading, the Community Development Department recommends the Town Council makes the following findings: "1. That the amendments are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town, based upon Section V of the Staff memorandum dated April 26, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented; and, 2. That the amendments further the general and specific purposes of Zoning Regulations, based upon Section V of the Staff memorandum dated April 26, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented; and, 3. That the amendments promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality, based upon Section V of the Staff memorandum dated April 26, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented." IV. ATTACHMENTS A. Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010 2 5/18/2010 8 -1 -2 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 8 SERIES OF 2010 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 12- 14 -20, COMMERCIAL CORE CONSTRUCTION, VAIL TOWN CODE, TO ALLOW FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE COMMERCIAL CORE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNAGE FOR BUSINESSES AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, significant redevelopment construction is proposed and already occurring within the Town of Vail has many physical and economic impacts on the Town's businesses, guests and residents; and, WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to minimize the negative impacts of this unprecedented volume of construction activities on the Town's businesses, guests and residents; and, WHEREAS, on April 26, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail held a public hearing and reviewed and forwarded a recommendation of approval for the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Regulations to the Vail Town Council in accordance with the procedures and criteria and findings outlined in Chapter 12 -3 of the Zoning Regulations of the Town of Vail; and, WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that the amendments are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town, based upon Section V of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission April 26, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented; and, WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that the amendments further the general and specific purposes of the Zoning Regulations, based upon Section V of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 26, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented; and, WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that the amendments promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality, based upon Section V of the Staff memorandum dated April 26, 2010; and, WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that the public health, safety, and welfare will be served by these adopting regulations, based upon Section V of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April 26, 2010, and the evidence and testimony presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Subsection 12- 14 -20C, the Vail Town Code is hereby amended as follows (text to be deleted is in , text that is to be added is bold, sections of text that are not amended have been omitted.): C. Termination of Section: The authority granted pursuant to this section shall terminate on Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010 5/18/2010 8 -2 -1 Attachment A April 1, 2040 2011, unless sooner extended or terminated by separate ordinance of the council. Section 2 . If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3 . The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4 . The amendment of any provision of the Town Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 5 . All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 4 th day of May, 2010, and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 18th day of May, 2010, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 18 day of May 2010. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2010 2 5/18/2010 8 -2 -2 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulation Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional movie theater, bowling alley, and public parking on private property signage, and to define the term first floor for the purposes of calculating allowable sign area, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100010) PRESENTER(S): Bill Gibson, Planner ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, on second reading. BACKGROUND: On April 12, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted 6 -0 -0 to forward a recommendation of approval, with modifications, to the Town Council for the proposed amendments to the Town's Sign Regulations.On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved, with modifications, the first reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, by a vote of 5 -1 -0 (Donovan opposed). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Town Council approves Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, on second reading. ATTACHMENTS: Council Memoorandum Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010 5/18/2010 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 18, 2010 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulation Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional movie theater, bowling alley, and public parking on private property signage, and to define the term first floor for the purposes of calculating allowable sign area, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC100010) Applicant: Peter Knobel, represented by Mauriello Planning Group Planner: Bill Gibson I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Peter Knobel, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, is requesting a second reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulation Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional movie theater, bowling alley, and public parking on private property signage, and to define the term first floor for the purposes of calculating allowable sign area, and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicant is proposing to amend the Town's Sign Regulations to address the following: • Additional bowling alley business identification signage • Additional movie theater signs business identification signage • Establishing public parking on private property sign regulations • Clarifying the sign area regulations for businesses not on the first floor Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, (Attachment A) has been attached for review. II. BACKGROUND On April 12, 2010, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted 6 -0 -0 to forward a recommendation of approval, with modifications, to the Town Council for the proposed amendments to the Town's Sign Regulations. On May 4, 2010, the Vail Town Council approved, with modifications, the first reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, by a vote of 5 -1 -0 (Donovan opposed). The modifications approved by the Vail Town Council on first reading were those specifically outlined in Section III, Recommendations, of the May 4, 2010, Staff memorandum to the Town Council as follows: 1 5/18/2010 9 -1 -1 • Modify Section 11- 6- 3 -A -1 -F to not address "businesses not on the first floor ", but to instead address "businesses not on the first floor or street level ". Staff believes the original intent of this regulation was to address non - street level businesses regardless of which story in the building they are located. • Establish a definition of first floor in the Sign Regulations that is consistent with the definition of the term "first floor or street level" found in Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code, currently used for implementing horizontal zoning. • Establish a definition of "Sign, Public Parking and Loading on Private Property" in the Sign Regulations that for consistency references the "public parking structure" and "public unstructured parking" land uses defined in Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. • Modify proposed Section 11- 7 -15 -1 to allow more than one Public Parking and Loading Sign for Private Property at the discretion of the "Administrator', rather than at the discretion of the "Design Review Board." Staff believes this modification maintains the applicant's and Commission's intent to allow an expedited review process without the need for a variance. Staff believes the evaluation of impacts to public safety and traffic is not the role of the Design Review Board, but rather the Administrator. • Modify proposed section 11- 7- 15 -A -3 by deleting the term "existing ". While this phrase is used elsewhere in the Sign Regulations, the phrase "existing grade" is a defined term in the Town's Zoning Regulations and refers to the historic grades of a site prior to any construction. The intent of the Sign Regulations is to ensure adequate sign clearance heights. These clearances are not related to pre - construction site grades. • Modify the term "available to the general public" in proposed Section 11- 7- 15 -8 -A to "for use by the public" for consistency with the "public parking structure" and "public unstructured parking" definition terminology of Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code. III. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Town Council for the first reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulation Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional movie theater, bowling alley, and public parking on private property signage, and to define the term first floor for the purposes of calculating allowable sign area, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Town Council choose to approve these amendments, the Community Development Department recommends the Town Council pass the following motion: 2 5/18/2010 9 -1 -2 "The Town Council approves, on second reading, Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, an ordinance amending Title 11, Sign Regulations, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulation Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for additional movie theater, bowling alley, and public parking on private property signage, and to define the term first floor for the purposes of calculating allowable sign area, and setting forth details in regard thereto." Should the Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, on second reading, the Community Development Department recommends the Town Council makes the following findings: "Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section V of Staff's April 12, 2010, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission and the evidence and testimony presented, the Town Council finds: 1. That the amendments are consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and 2. That the amendments further the general and specific purposes of the sign regulations; and 3. That the amendments promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promote the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. " IV. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010 3 5/18/2010 9 -1 -3 ORDINANCE NO. 10 Series of 2010 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 11, SIGN REGULATIONS, VAIL TOWN CODE, TO ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL MOVIE THEATER, BOWLING ALLEY, AND PUBLIC PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY SIGNAGE, AND TO DEFINE THE TERM FIRST FLOOR FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Section 11 -3 -3, Prescribed Regulation Amendment, Vail Town Code, sets forth the procedures for amending the Town's Sign Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on April 12, 2010, on the application to amend the Town's Sign Regulations, in accordance with the provisions of the Vail Town Code; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission has forwarded a recommendation of approval, with modifications, to the Vail Town Council by a vote of 6 -0 -0 of the request to amend the Town's Sign Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determines that the amendment to the Town's Sign Regulations is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail comprehensive plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the town; and, WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determines that the amendment to the Town's Sign Regulations furthers the general and specific purposes of the sign regulations; and, WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds and determines that the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: SECTION 1 . Section 11 -2 -1: Definitions Enumerated, Vail Town Code, is hereby amended in part as follows (text to be deleted is in stpikethpe gI text that is to be added is bold, and sections of text that are not amended have been omitted) FIRST FLOOR OR STREET LEVEL: Forthe purposes of calculating allowable sign area, first floor or street level shall be any floor, or portion of any floor, of a structure located at or nearest to (either above or below) the level of the adjacent vehicular or pedestrian way, as determined by the Administrator. More than one floor, or portion of floors, may be defined as first floor or street level within a single structure. SIGN, PUBLIC PARKING AND LOADING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY: A sign that is permitted for private properties which provide public unstructured parking or public parking structures as defined by Section 12 -2 -2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, with a minimum of 25 parking spaces and /or loading bays available for use by the public. These public parking spaces and loading bays Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, second reading 5,18,201a 9 -2 -1 must be above and beyond the requirements of Chapter 12 -10, Off - Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code. SECTION 2 . Section 11- 6- 3 -A -1: Business Identification Signs in Sign District 1, Vail Town Code, is hereby amended in part as follows (text to be deleted is in 6tFikethF9Ug4, text that is to be added is bold, and sections of text that are not amended have been omitted) b. Area: The allowable area of each business identification sign shall be up to six (6) square feet. At the discretion of the Design Review Board, a business identification sign for a bowling alley or movie theater may be up to fifteen (15) square feet in area, subject to the applicant demonstrating that the sign area is harmonious with the scale and architectural character of the subject business and the building in which it is located. f. Businesses Not On the First Floor or Street Level: Businesses not located on the first floor or street level shall be allowed only one projecting sign with a maximum area of four (4) square feet; location shall be subject to design review. SECTION 3 . Section 11 -7 -15: Public Parking and Loading Signs for Private Property, Vail Town Code, is hereby established as follows (text that is to be added is bold): 11 -7 -15: Public Parking and Loading Signs for Private Property: A. Description: A public parking and loading sign is permitted for private properties which provide public unstructured parking or public parking structures as defined by Section 12 -2 -2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, with a minimum of 25 parking spaces and /or loading bays for use by the public. These public parking spaces must be above and beyond the requirements of Chapter 12 -10, Off - Street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code. 1. Number: One sign per public vehicular entrance, unless the Administrator determines fewer or additional signs are necessary to promote the safe and expedient flow of traffic. 2. Area: The allowable area of any single public parking and loading sign shall not exceed ten (10) square feet, unless the Administrator determines a smaller or larger area is necessary to promote the safe and expedient flow of traffic. 3. Height: Projecting and awning signs shall have a minimum clearance of eight (8') feet above pedestrian ways and a minimum clearance of fifteen feet (15') above vehicular ways. No part of any public parking or loading signs shall extend more than twenty five feet (25') above grade. 4. Location: Subject to design review. Signs may be permitted in the Town's street right -of -way, subject to Section 5 -3 -I, Placement on Public Property, of this Chapter. 5. Type: Awning, freestanding, projecting or wall mounted. 6. Lighting: Subject to design review. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, second reading 5/18/201 9 -2 -2 7. Landscaping: Subject to design review. 8. Special Provisions: a. Public parking and loading signs shall include language and /or symbols identifying parking and /or loading bays available for use by the public on no less than fifty percent (50 %) of the total sign area. b. Signs may identify the owner or the project name and logo. c. Changeable copy may be allowed to identify the availability of parking spaces and /or loading bays. SECTION 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Vail Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 5. The Vail Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. The Council's finding, determination and declaration is based upon the review of the criteria prescribed by the Town Code of Vail and the evidence and testimony presented in consideration of this ordinance. SECTION 6. The amendment of any provision of the Town Code of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. SECTION 7. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 4 th day of May, 2010 and a public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 18 day of May, 2010, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, second reading 5/18/201 9 -2 -3 INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 18th day of May, 2010. Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2010, second reading 4 5/18/2010 9 -2 -4 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. PRESENTER(S): Tom Kassmel ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Town Council approves Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan is to evaluate the current lighting conditions along the frontage roads and provide direction to the Town of Vail for improvements that are intended to: 1. Improve safe utilization of the frontage roads by motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and overflow vehicle parking. 2. Manage appropriate lights levels and illumination strategies along the frontage roads. 3. Manage long term economics and maintenance for lighting systems. 4. Establish consistency in the aesthetic appearance of lighting systems. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Town Council approves Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. ATTACHMENTS: Memo and Resolution PEC Memo Presentation Lighting Master Plan LMP- LayoutPlans LMP PhotometricsPlan -1 -6 LMP PhotometricsPlan -7 -12 5/18/2010 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Public Works Department and Community Development Department DATE: May 18, 2010 SUBJECT: Final review of Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090014) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a final review of a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. II. BACKGROUND On May 10 2010, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission voted 4- 0-0 to forward a recommendation of approval for the proposed Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. III. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Town Council for the adoption of Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Town Council choose to approve this request; the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Town Council pass the following motion: "The Town Council approves Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010, a resolution adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. " Should the Town Council choose to approve this request; the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Town Council makes the following findings: "Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section IV of Staff's May 10, 2010, memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Town Council finds: 1. That the Master Plan is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town, and Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010 1 5/18/2010 10 -1 -1 2. That the Master Plan furthers the general and specific purposes of the Vail Transportation Master Plan; and 3. That the Master Plan promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality." IV. ATTACHMENT A. Resolution No.14, Series of 2010 Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010 2 5/18/2010 10 -1 -2 RESOLUTION NO. 14 Series of 2010 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FRONTAGE ROAD LIGHTING MASTER PLAN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the "Town "), in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado and the Town Charter (the "Charter"); and WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council ") have been duly elected and qualified; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail is in the process of adopting the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan in response to safety and wayfinding concerns along the Frontage Roads, to the on -going and projected increases in development activity, the results of past master planning processes, and pending redevelopment plans; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to provide a single guiding document for lighting installations along the Frontage Roads within a master plan document; and WHEREAS, the proposed plan is based upon existing conditions, current trends and anticipated future growth consistent with the Vail Transportation Master Plan. The proposed master plan is intended to be a guide for the Town's Frontage Road lighting for the next 20 years; and WHEREAS, the Council finds and determines that the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Council finds and determines that the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan further the general and specific purposes of the Vail Transportation Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Council finds and determines that the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. The Council hereby approves and authorizes the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Council of the Town of Vail held this 18 day of May, 2010. Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010 3 5/18/2010 10 -1 -3 Richard D. Cleveland, Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Resolution No. 14, Series of 2010 4 5/18/2010 10 -1 -4 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Public Works Department and Community Development Department DATE: May 10, 2010 SUBJECT: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090014) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Tom Kassmel Planner: Bill Gibson I. SUMMARY The applicant, the Town of Vail, is requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan. The proposed Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan includes recommendations on the location of street lights, light pole heights, lamp selection, fixture selection, and control system criteria. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria outlined in Section IV of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department and Public Works Department recommend the Commission forwards a recommendation of approval subject to the findings noted in Section V of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST As stated in the proposed Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan: "The purpose of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan is to evaluate the current lighting conditions along the frontage roads and provide direction to the Town of Vail for improvements that are intended to: 1. Improve safe utilization of the frontage roads by motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and overflow vehicle parking. 2. Manage appropriate lights levels and illumination strategies along the frontage roads. 3. Manage long term economics and maintenance for lighting systems. 4. Establish consistency in the aesthetic appearance of lighting systems. " In addition to outlining the plan's objectives, the proposed Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan includes recommendations on the location of street lights, light pole heights, lamp selection, fixture selection, and control system criteria. Recommendations for implementation strategies and material specifications are also included in the proposed plan. The proposed Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan has been attached for review (Attachment A). 1 5/1 8/2010 10 -2 -1 III. BACKGROUND The Town of Vail, in conjunction with the Colorado Department of Transportation, adopted the Vail Transportation Master Plan in May 2009 in response to the on -going and projected increases in development activity, the results of past master planning processes, and pending redevelopment plans. As a separate element of this plan, the Town is also in the process of adopting a lighting master plan for both the North and South Frontage Roads. While the need for improved safety and way finding are the primary drivers for creating this lighting master plan; the Town is also addressing aesthetics and environmental stewardship issues in this plan. The proposed lighting master plan is intended to be implemented in stages as opportunities arise over time. There are currently no funded projects within the Town's budget to move an initial phase forward. Both frontage roads are located within the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) right -of -way (ROW) and are administered thru the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Pursuant to Section 43 -2 -135, Division of Authority of Streets, Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS), the Town of Vail is responsible for the illumination of the frontage roads. The frontage roads currently have minimal roadway and pedestrian lighting. The existing roadway lighting is limited to the roundabouts, and the existing pedestrian lighting is limited to the commercial core areas and street intersections. With this limited lighting, there are both safety concerns and way- finding challenges for all modes of transportation. The overflow vehicle parking that occurs along the frontage roads at peak times is a significant safety concern. Overflow parking occurs on the frontage roads 30 to 50 times per year. This parking occurs at the busiest times of the year, in the busiest locations along the frontage roads, during the shortest daylight hours of the year, during times of inclement weather when road conditions are poor. The parking also occurs on the opposite side of a visitor's primary destination thus requiring pedestrians to cross the frontage roads. The combination of these factors presents a precarious situation for vehicles entering and exiting parking spaces along the frontage roads, for pedestrians entering and exiting their parked vehicles, and for pedestrian trying to cross the frontage roads at various locations to access the commercial core areas. Other safety concerns include the general inability of vehicle drivers to adequately see pedestrians, bicycles, stopped buses, and other obstacles at night. Nighttime way- finding challenges currently exist at the roundabouts and at local road intersections along the frontage roads. The existing frontage road conditions limit the ability of drivers to determine their necessary direction of travel without becoming lost. Primary vehicle routes need to be illuminated at major intersections to lead drivers who are unfamiliar with the area down the right path. Secondary road intersections also need to be illuminated to allow the unfamiliar driver an opportunity to anticipate upcoming intersections and to give the driver the ability to read relevant signage. Notable destination points such as the Village parking structure, Lionshead parking structure, and Ford Park also need to be property illuminated. The Town anticipates that the proposed lighting master plan will be implemented over time as roadway and private development construction projects occur. Staff believes it is critical that each individual development project adjacent to the frontage roads be coordinated with a comprehensive street lighting master plan. Unfortunately, there are multiple private developments and roadway improvement projects already under 2 5/18/2010 10 -2 -2 construction adjacent to the frontage roads. The roadway and pedestrian lighting improvements associated with this construction is currently being implemented on a project -by- project basis, rather than in a comprehensive and coordinated manner. The proposed lighting master plan is intended to remedy this situation and provide direction into the future. The Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan was first presented to the Commission in March of 2009 as an element of the Transportation Master Plan (adopted May 2009). Subsequent work sessions with the Commission in April, May, and September 2009 discussed the key elements of the lighting master plan and its purpose. Commission's discussions focused on the future use of high pressure sodium lights or LED lights as recommended by the draft plan. High pressure sodium is the current standard roadway lighting in Vail. High pressure sodium street lighting is a proven technology, is relatively energy efficient and cost effective, and produces an aesthetically pleasing warm light source. LED's are a relatively new technology for roadway lighting that offer higher levels of energy efficiency, greater cost savings, and improved color rendering and visual shape recognition. However, LED's produce a whiter, "cooler' light that has a different aesthetic character than high pressure sodium lamps. At the Commission's September 2009 work session, the majority of the Commission preferred the aesthetic character of the existing high pressure sodium lighting over the proposed LED lighting. Since the Commission's September 28, 2009, work session, the proposed Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan has been further refined. Additionally, the Town's energy audit consultants, Rocky Mountain Institute and Johnson Controls Inc., have also reviewed the proposed master plan regarding LED lighting and its use relative to the objectives of the Vail Environmental Sustainability Strategic Plan. A copy of Commission's September 28, 2009, meeting results have been attached for reference (Attachment B). The proposed master plan recommends the implementation of the LED light source as it is more effective, more efficient, and endorses the Town's objectives of environmental stewardship. This decision has been endorsed by the Rocky Mountain Institute and Johnson Controls Inc.: "Rocky Mountain Institute, currently serving as a Town of Vail energy audit consultant, endorses the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan. The plan clearly identifies the intended end - use(s) of the light, such as visual acuity and aesthetics, for each lighting zone. By focusing on the end -use first, the report demonstrates that LED technology can adequately meet the need on the frontage road with far fewer carbon emissions and less cost than the current lighting solution. "...Michael Bendewald, Rocky Mountain Institute. Johnson Controls Inc. agrees with the statement below: "The installation of LED lighting along the Frontage Road is consistent with the environmental sustainable goals endorsed by the Town and consistent with the recommendations of the Town's Energy audit consultant, Rocky Mountain Institute, and that future installations of street lighting should consider LED technology where appropriate as they are environmentally friendlier than other lighting sources. " 3 5/1 8/2010 10 -2 -3 "1 got the impression from Kristen (Kristen Bertuglia, Vail's Environmental Sustainability Coordinator) that the PEC prefers the HPS lights as they appear to be less obtrusive to the surrounding night environment. While this is true, it is basically due to the fact that the yellow light output of HPS lamps makes visual recognition difficult at night. Figure 2.6 in your current Frontage Road Lighting Master plan is a great example of the poor rendering characteristics of HPS compared to LEDs which have a bluer /cooler spectrum. Dark sky initiatives and light pollution concerns should be addressed by fixture selection and mounting heights as is recommended in your lighting plan, not by providing an inferior light spectrum. Erin A. Ells, P. E., C. E. M, Johnson Controls IV. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. The extent to which the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the master plan. The current Vail Transportation Master Plan does not address street lighting for the frontage roads. The proposed amendment addresses this key topic. The proposed amendment addresses the issues of public safety, environmental stewardship ( "dark sky" friendly lighting and energy efficiency), and community aesthetics. The proposed amendment addresses this key topic. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed regulation amendment is consistent with the purposes of the master plan. 2. The extent to which the amendment would better implement and better achieve the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town. The current Vail Transportation Master Plan does not address street lighting for the frontage roads. The proposed amendment addresses this key topic. The proposed amendment addresses the issues of public safety, environmental stewardship ( "dark sky" friendly lighting and energy efficiency), and community aesthetics. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed amendment better implements and achieves the adopted goals, objectives and policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan. 3. The extent to which the amendment demonstrates how conditions have substantially changed since the adoption of the subject regulation and how the existing regulation is no longer appropriate or is inapplicable. The current Vail Transportation Master Plan does not address street lighting for the frontage roads. The proposed amendment addresses this key topic. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed amendment addresses this criterion. 4. The extent to which the amendment provides a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land use regulations consistent with municipal development objectives. The current Vail Transportation Master Plan does not address street lighting for the frontage roads. The proposed amendment addresses this key topic. The proposed amendment addresses the issues of public safety, environmental 4 5/18/2010 10 -2 -4 stewardship ( "dark sky" friendly lighting and energy efficiency), and community aesthetics. Staff believes the proposed amendments will facilitate and provide a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land use regulations consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and development objectives. 5. Such other factors and criteria the Commission and /or Council deem applicable to the proposed text amendment. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department and Public Works Department recommend the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval for this request; Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan, an element of the Vail Transportation Master Plan, and setting forth details in regard thereto. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council for the proposed text amendment, the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: "Based upon a review of Section IV of the StalTs May 10, 2010, memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. That the amendment is consistent with the applicable elements of the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the development objectives of the Town; and 2. That the amendment furthers the general and specific purposes of the Transportation Master Plan; and 3. That the amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality." VI. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Attachment B: September 28, 2009, public hearing results (in part) 5 5/1 8/2010 10 -2 -5 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Goal: Provide the Town with a guiding document with regard to the installation of lighting along the North and South Frontage Roads Implementation: Implementation will occur on a as needed and as funded basis. Each project will be reviewed for final approval on its own merits and will be required to evaluate the most current practices in lighting design and technology. Currently at this time there are no funded Frontage Road Lighting projects .being actively pursued. objectives: SAFETY: Enhance object recognition (overflow Parking, Pedestrians, Bicyclists, Vehicles) ENVIRONMENTAL: Dark Shy, efficiency. I AESTHETICS: Light levels character *r, WAYFINDING: Traffic flow, target destinations Background May 2009: Adoption of the Vail Transportation Master Plan — leading to the discussion of the need for a Lighting Master plan for the Frontage Roads as well as landscaping & signage. April 2009 —May 2010: PEC process, including a test site at Ford Park, culminating in a recommendation of Approval 4 -0 -0 September 2009: Update to Council on the status of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Master Plan Recommendations Recommended Spacing: • Spacing is based on need to recognize activity, objects and wayfinding with an awareness of the mountain /dark sky surroundings • Light levels /coverage is appropriate for a local roadway in a rural setting and character of Vail, with ranges from High to Low light level. The High level was set by the existing light level in the Vail roundabouts. (40% less light than a standard high level) - 4.6 fc i 1.46 fc at 20' from pole .25 fc at edge of beam pattern ® io ' 'Ek High Level Strategy - West Vail Mid Level, 100'- 156'spacing cuff /� Strategy — EVerVdll tttttttttttttt� Low Level, 175'- 225'spacing O High Level Secondary Intersections t �� f Mid Level, 100" spacing qJn Low Level, 225' spacing f; i lie, ' �p�nva o o ; p �� Secondary Intersections -- 1 Fiuure 4. /� , Fioure 4.3 Strategy - Village to Lionshead High Level Strategy - Vail Village to Ford Park Mid Level, 11 50'spacing High Level Low Level, 175'- 225'spacing ` Mid Level, 100' 150'spacing Secondary Intersections J ��� "� Low Leve1,175'- 225° spacing Secondary Intersections p C° -. 9 5/18/2010 Figure 4.2 10 - 3 - 6 Figure 4.1 Master Plan Recommendations Recommended Light Pole Height: • For most efficient and effective light level a 25' pole is recommended, which will require a variance from the maximum allowed pole height of 20'. The variance will be needed at the time of project approvals or modification may be made to the Town Code. Benefits of 25-0" POLE • Poles on Hwy side only (reducing # of poles by 20 %) • Reduced capital, maintenance, life cycle costs • Minimize impact to private property • Eliminate need for easements on private property • Less visual impact with fewer poles • Remains "Dark Sky" compliant Master Plan Recommendations Recommended LED Lighting Technology Why LED vs HPS? • LED is 25% more efficient than the current HPS technology in an overall life cycle costs and 50% more energy efficient overall. • LED is recommended by the Town's Energy Auditors, JCI & RMI • LED best complies with the desire to be a Sustainable Community. Annual Life Cycle Life Cycle Initial System Total Lile Cycle Energy Cost Maintenance Cost Cost(*]) . Cost 1 S15,333.00 $41,602.00 $113,687.00 r • LED provides the best object recognition and color rendering LED is a° whiter light and is p` appropriate along the Frontage Roads. • The LED fixture selected allows for system /fixture control RED and can be made - uwc brighter if needed for ` special events and emergencies. LED Lighting Rendering t 1f . �fl loll r *LED Lighting appropriate for vehicular lighting *Maintains HIPS for pedestrian scale lighting (Village Fixture) Master Plan Recommendations Recommeded Aesthetic /Character Aesthetics and Character top A.a TQV Village Pole Black Straight Pole with Cast (Future Mod for full cutoff) Base r y Bike /Ped Path Banner Arms Corten Steel Bollard X F MIL 5p" 2 y 4 CT 8 . J CAI q r li I. a �� _ 7 _ �+ " � 2 _r.. - - _� - j . -e _ ___ _ _ -. _ i - __ . _.+. _ -. i ` -T,.� �. f �� ���� ,�� e i r ,. ,_�� Questions ?? Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan FRONTAGE ROAD LIGHTING MASTER PLAN AIFC MIT \TB LIKING\ 3981 N-th Steel Street UnitB Oenver,CO80205 ! 303.242.8663 t nancy(4fa6rayfighting.cam n' fabraoighting.com Town of Vail, Colorado Department of Public Works and Transportation 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, Colorado 81658 May 2010 5/18/2010 10 -4- 1 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Acknowlegements We appreciate the following people and organizations in assisting in evaluation of the Master Plan, and contributing to the development of a Plan that is in compliance with Town of Vail guidelines, standards, and character. Town Council Mayor Dick Cleveland Mayor Pro -tem Kim Newbury Council Member Kerry Donovan Council Member Susie Tjossem Council Member Margaret Rogers Council Member Andy Daly Council Member Kevin Foley Public and Environmental Commission Chairman Bill Pierce Co -Chair David Viele Commissioner Sarah Robinson - Paladino Commissioner Tyler Schneidman Commissioner Henry Pratt Commissioner Luke Cartin Commissioner Michael Kurz Desian Review Board Chairman Pete Dunning Co -Chair Tom DuBois Board Member Elizabeth Plante Board Member Brian Gillette Board Member Rollie Kjesbo We extend appreciation to the community for participating in the survey at the lighting test site during the summer of 2009. We appreciate the following enterprises for assisting in the preparation of the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan: Cator Ruma and Associates, Co. 896 Tabor Street Lakewood, Colorado 80401 DHM Design Inc. 1390 Lawrence Street, Suite 100 Denver, Colorado 80204 5/18/2010 10 -4 -2 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: Introduction A. Executive Summary /Purpose B. Areas Covered by the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan C. Areas Not Covered by the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 2: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Summary A. Conclusions B. Condition sValidating the Master Lighting Plan C. Pole Height Options Studied D. Lamping Options Studied PART 3: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Objectives A. Roadway Safety B. Compliance with Objectives of Vail Lighting Ordinance and Environmental Stewardship C. Positive Aesthetic Effect PART 4: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Recommendations A. Equipment Locations on Frontage Roads B. Pole Height C. Lamp Selection D. Fixture Selection E. Controls System Criteria PART 5: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Approval Documentation PART 6: Appendix A P4ges A. Standards, Studies, and Guidelines Referenced B. Similar LED Roadway Lighting Installations PART 7: Appendix B L Pages A. Manufacturer's Specification Sheets PART 8: Appendix C A. Life Cycle Cost Analysis - 5 source sample study B. Life Cycle Cost Analysis - LED full installation C. Details PART 9: Appendix D A. Photographs and Field Measurements of Light Levels at Town of Vail Comparative Sites PART 10: Roadway Photometric Plans 5/18/2010 10 -4 -3 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Part 1: Introduction to Frontage Roads Master Lighting Plan A. Executive Summary The Frontage Roads Master Lighting Plan is the culmination of research, discussion, test applications, and community input. This document represents the best evaluation and recommendations, based on the most current theory and practices for safe roadway lighting, weighted with the imperative to support the character and aesthetic that has made Town of Vail a unique, premier destination resort. The purpose of the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan is to evaluate the current lighting conditions along the Frontage Roads and provide direction to Town of Vail for improvements that are intended to: 1. Improve safe utilization of the frontage roads by motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and overflow vehicle parking. 2. Manage appropriate light levels and illumination strategies along the frontage roads. 3. Manage long term economics and maintenance for lighting systems. 4. Establish consistency in the aesthetic appearance of lighting systems. The Lighting Master Plan is a guiding document and does not constitute final approval to proceed with any of the recommendations. Any specific project, private or public, will prepare and submit required documents to the agencies, boards, commissions, and councils within the Town of Vail who are charged with review and approval prior to implementation. The Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan conforms to current lighting ordinances and standards adopted by Town of Vail to the extent that the purpose of the Lighting Master Plan is achieved. A variance is recommended in the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan to increase the pole height for frontage roadway lighting to 25' -0 ". Per the Town Code, 14- 10- 7.D.2, "Height Limits For Light Fixtures: Outdoor lights affixed to a structure shall not exceed the height of the roof eaves. The maximum mounting height for light sources on a pole shall not exceed twenty feet (20')." Supporting documentation for the variance recommended in the Frontage Roads Master Lighting Plan is explained in detail in Part 2 1C. Periodic review of the Lighting Master Plan is advised to evaluate suitability of applications, evolving technologies that may equate to cost savings and improved performance, and trends in design practices. B. Areas of the frontage roads addressed by the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan include (see Figure 1.1): 1. The south frontage road: Ford Park to West Vail 2. The north frontage road: Main Vail to West Vail 3. The future Simba Run underpass C. Areas of the Frontage Road NOT addressed by the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan include: 1. Main Vail interchange and roundabouts 2. West Vail Interchange and roundabouts 3. Private Property 4. Commercial Core Areas 5/18/2010 10 -4 -4 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan ed fa �i r V ' D �f 1l b v 9 o a C �+ a �1 - ,LI a C [T7 to UJ C- C) cis ce LL c a + w< D —j _ � w Ind rd CL ° to a � a a °o ° Figure 1.1 PART 2: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan H� a ga - -- - - - -- - 5/18/2010 - - - -- Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan A. Conclusion 1. Based on the lack of effective roadway lighting along the Frontage Roads, and the resulting safety hazard to all Frontage Road users, the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan proposes lighting systems that: a. address the conditions conducive to night -time visibility, b. support the Town of Vail commitment to environmental stewardship through energy efficiency and dark -skies compliance, C. minimize the impact of additional lighting on the character of Town of Vail through considerations for quality and quantity of light, d. and minimize the life -cycle cost of such a system to the town. 2. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan proposes a solid -state LED roadway lighting system, based on anticipated energy savings of approximately 50% and 25% minimum life cycle cost savings compared to the Town of Vail standard lamp source, which is high pressure sodium. 3. In addition to the proposed roadway lighting system, which is a "whiter" light source, The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan recommends integrating other methods to enhance the "romantic" character of the Town of Vail including: a. The use of the Village Lantern, a warmer lamp source, on a decorative 14' -0" pedestrian scale pole. b. Placement of bollards to match those installed on the bike paths leading to Donovan Park at high density traffic intersections with bike /pedestrian path crossovers to improve visibility for bicyclists and motorists. C. 14' -0" height banner arm poles to match the Village Lantern pole installed in new medians at key high activity turn lanes, such as the Village and Lionshead parking structures, as an opportunity to educate and inform residents and visitors of Town of Vail features and events. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan does not recommend locations for placement of banner arm poles, however product specifications are included to suggest design characteristics consistent with the roadway lighting equipment characteristics. i I 5/18/2010 10 -4 -6 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan B. Conditions Validating the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan 1. The frontage roadways are not adequately illuminated for safety. a. Existing frontage roadway lighting is limited to street lights at the Village and West Vail roundabouts, area lights in the underpasses, and pedestrian -scale street poles at intermittent properties and intersections such as at Matterhorn Drive. There is no effective street lighting along either frontage road. See figure 2.1 and 2.2 as an example. b. The north and south frontage roads are arterial roadways shared by vehicles, public transportation, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Specific areas of the frontage roads also serve as roadside parking when the Vail parking structures are full, which occurs 25 -30 times per year. c. The lack of appropriate roadway lighting inhibits the quick, accurate, and comfortable visibility at night needed for safe utilization of the Frontage Roads. The benefit of quality nighttime roadway lighting, as substantiated by IDA Outdoor Lighting Code Handbook, IESNA RP -8 -00, and the NEMA /ANSI Standard for Roadway and Area Lighting (see Appendix A for more information on these referenced organizations), is to facilitate assessment of roadway conditions such as: • Pavement that is clear and free of obstacles for a reasonable distance. • Position of a moving vehicle relative to lane and roadway edges. • Location and meaning of traffic and directional signage. • Position and anticipated course of moving objects on and near the roadway. • Recognition of destinations in order to make timely driving decisions. d. The recent adoption of an updated Transportation Master Plan, which responds to current and future growth and development for Town of Vail, identifies a clear recognition that frontage road improvements provide a benefit to the community. Addressing visibility deficits is key to the safe utilization of the Town's frontage roadway system. Pedestrian Pole at Village Garage - South Frontage Road Area Light at Matterhorn Dr - South Frontage Road Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 2. Providing roadway lighting at selected sections along the Frontage Roads will benefit the safe utilization of the roadways by residents and visitors. a. IESNA RP -8 -00 is an industry standard which identifies recommended practices for roadway lighting applications (See Part 6 /Appendix A for more information on this standard). Criterion in the Recommended Practice used in developing the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan includes: • Light levels expressed in terms of maximum, minimum, and average footcandle illuminance (direct light incident on the roadway) for roadway usage classifications in conjunction with high, 5/18/2010 10 -4 -7 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan medium, and low pedestrian conflict classifications. These are baseline light levels appropriate for an urban setting. • Values for uniformity of lighting based on the ratio of average to minimum illuminance. b. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan establishes light levels that are appropriate for the rural setting and character of Town of Vail. The Local classification for roadway usage, as defined by IESNA RP -8 -00, is the criterion that most closely fits the light levels appropriate for Town of Vail. Determination of these light levels was made based on: • Measurement of existing light levels at the Village and West Vail turnabouts and I -70 off - ramps, as the baseline for the highest level of light acceptable for Town of Vail. • Comparative studies and light level measurements for illuminated sites and intersections in the Town of Vail including Safeway and City Market parking lots, Village pedestrian cross walks, Matternhorn Drive intersection, and Donovan Park parking lot. • A test site installed at the Ford Park bus stop drive an LED source and the standard High Pressure Sodium source installed. • Photometric studies of a sample roadway section (Village round about to Ford Park) • Feedback from Town of Vail City Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, and Design Review Board, expressing the community value to maintain a low level of lighting. C. Based on preferences expressed by TOV City Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, and Design Review Board, the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan recommends a zone strategy for light levels, based on volume and complexity of traffic/ pedestrian activity at sections of the Frontage Roads: • High Zone: Existing Village and West roundabouts. This represents the maximum target light level and applies to the portions of the Frontage Roads with highest volume and complexity of activity such as the proposed Simba Run roundabouts. • Medium Zone: High volume, high activity, and high potential for conflict (between motorists, pedestrians, bicycles, and /or parked vehicles) - primarily major parking structures and approaches to such. • Low Zone: Medium to high volume traffic, medium activity, and medium potential conflict - primarily transitional roadway sections between major commercial access and medium /high zones. • Secondary Intersections Zone: Intermittent intersections along the Frontage Roads, not within a low or medium zone, with volume, activity, and /or potential conflict substantial enough to benefit from area lighting. • Portions of the Frontage Roads with limited residential and /or commercial access and minimal conflict potential (any zone not included in one of the four previously defined zones) which are intended to remain "dark zones" - no roadway lighting recommendation in the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan. C. Study of Pole Height Options: 1 . Calculation of light levels were performed for a sample roadway section (Medium Zone classification), from the Village Roundabout to Village Parking Garage, using a 20' -0" pole and 25' -0" pole to understand the potential impact of pole height on the application of Frontage Road lighting. Three significant conditions were revealed in the study, indicating the 25' -0" pole provided benefit associated with cost, performance, and aesthetics: • The 25' -0" pole provided better uniformity of illumination across the roadway as compared to the 20' -0" pole. • The 25' -0' pole met target illuminance values across the width of the Frontage Road for most 3 and 4 lane sections with poles positioned on just one side of the roadway - see figure 2.5 which illustrates the light coverage for the 4 -lane section of roadway (diagram from the Master Transportation Plan). The 20'- 0" pole, which reduces the area of illumination by 20% commensurate with the proximity of the source to the pavement by 5' -0 ", requires poles placement on both sides of the roadway to meet target illuminance values across the width of the Frontage Road. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -8 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan • The 25' -0" pole met target illuminance values with 20% fewer poles compared to the 20' -0" pole in the sample study area 2. The benefits of using 25' -0' poles installed primarily on one side, in the shoulder adjacent to the Interstate, are: a. Reduced initial equipment cost due to fewer poles and lights. b. Reduced installation cost associated with earthwork and electrical distribution /branch circuiting. C. Lower life -cycle cost. d. Reduced disturbance to private and public properties during installation. e. Less visual impact with fewer poles. CcnVw4A A Ttru U La ad T1ru te � cr An 1.p 14' Lwo 12 Lane J 1 nu 12 LS V 6 4 -LANE CROSS- SECTION 25' -0" Pole - light distribution at 60 degree angle Pseudo -color lamp distribution at 25' Lou nmosrtl�w for 14 1T tale 16 Lam 12 Len 6 Wa: a 1b i!V 4 -LANE CROSS- SECTION 20' -0" Pole - light distribution at 60 degree angle Pseudo -color lamp distribution at 20' Figure 2.5 D. Study of Light Source (lamping) Options: The standard street lighting lamp utilized in Town of Vail is a I OOW high pressure sodium (HPS) lamp, GE LongLife Lucalox ED23.5, which is a common industry lamp for roadway applications, predicated on the rated lamp life (40,000 hours) and efficacy (66 lumens per watt - a measure of light output relative to power input). The intent of the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan is to achieve equal or improved cost and performance, using the standard HPS lamp as the baseline for comparison. Three lamp sources representing newer developments in lamp technology - Ceramic Metal Halide (CMH), Induction, and LED solid state - were compared to the standard HPS for technical characteristics, cost, and actual visual performance. The studies performed are summarized in the following. The resulting conclusions of the combined studies were: 5/18/2010 10 -4 -9 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan • The CMH compared unfavorably in the cost analysis, and was eliminated from further consideration. • The induction source, in visual observation, produced distracting shadows and distorted modeling, and was eliminated from further consideration. • The LED solid state source exceeded the HPS baseline in most categories of technical, cost, and visual performance. 1 . Technical characteristics of the four lamp sources were compared. The study results is summarized in the table below, and characteristics which represent improvement compared to the HPS baseline source are highlighted in red /bold text. a. Light Output and Efficiency Characteristics data published by lamp manufacturer's based on industry testing standards. • Efficacy - lumen output relative to wattage input, or light delivered relative to power used. Expressed as lumens per watt (LPW). The higher the LPW value the better the efficacy. • Rated Lamp Life - The average life of a lamp of a given type, as determined from a large sample operated under laboratory conditions. • Lumen Depreciation - A value, expressed as a percentage, which reflects the overall performance of a lamp over its life. As lamps are burned, their lumen output decreases. The lower the percentage, the better the life time performance of the lamp. b. Quality of Light Characteristics data published by lamp manufacturer's based on industry testing standards. These qualitative characteristics improve night time visibility in that they effect perception of color, depth, and contrast: • CRI - color rendering index, a value from 0 -100, which indicates the spectral range of colors detectable under the source. The higher the value, the better the source allows us to see objects as we would expect to see them in daylight. • CCT - correlated color temperature, a value expressed in degrees Kelvin (K) that describes the overall color appearance of the source, from yellow or orange /warmer (2600K is incandescent) to bluish /cooler (4100K is the color of moonlight). Recent studies indicate that the eye adapts better to cooler color temp eratures at ni ht. Source Specification System Initial Efficacy Rated Lumen CRI CCT Wattage Lumens Lamp Life Depreciation (hrs) HPS Lucalox 138 9200 66 LPW 40,000 20% 25 2000K baseline LU100 /100 /SBY /D CMH Phillips Pulse Start 125 9000 72 LPW 24,000 25% 85 4000K CDM/ 100 /U /PS /4K /ALTO LED - BetaLED 166 8998 55 LPW 75,000 15% 70 4300K 525mA 90/525mA/4300K Induction U.S.Lighting Tech 110 8500 77 LPW 100,000 30% 85 4000K 2. Initial and life -cycle costs were compared for the four sources, based on a sample pole layout for a section of the Frontage Road, from the Village Roundabout to the Village Parking Garage, and targeting the illuminance and uniformity values as defined by IESNA RP -8 -00 for local roadway usage classification. In the summary table below the costs which represent an improvement compared to the HPS baseline source are highlighted in red /bold text. The CMH source was eliminated from consideration based on cost. 5/18/2010 10 -4- 10 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Source Life Cycle Life Cycle Initial System Total Life Cycle Amortized Energy Cost Maintenance Cost Cost( *1) Annual Cost ( *2) Cost HPS $31,639.00 $53,729.00 $64,550.00 $149,918.00 $5,997.00 Baseline CMH $28,659.00 $106,858.00 $62,284.00 $197,801.00 $7,912.00 LED - 525mA $28,246.00 $56,776.00 $56,804.00 $141,826.00 $5,673.00 Induction $27,237.00 $57,097.00 $45,630.00 $129,965.00 $5,199.00 ( *I Jotal Life Cycle Cost is for the total quantity of luminaires represented in the sample pole layout for 25 years ( *2) Amortized Annual Cost is for the total quantity of luminaires represented, annually for a 25 year life cycle. 3. In addition to the statistical analysis, the actual visual performance of the sources was evaluated: a. The City of Loveland, Colorado, installed a roadway lighting test site using LED, Induction, and HPS on 25' -0" poles. Public Works officials including Greg Hall, Tom Kassmel, Todd Oppenheimer, and Leo Vasquez visited the test site to evaluate the sources. Observations of the three sources facilitated the selection of a single comparative source - LED - for a test site at Ford Park. b. Ford Park Test Site: Comparison between a HPS and LED roadway light, installed on 25' -0" poles, yielded the following results: • The LED source, with a similar lumen output to the HPS, appeared too bright. By adjusting the power driver current at the luminaire (a characteristic unique to LED technology), the LED source light output could be reduced by 40 %, which resulted in less light but acceptable visibility. Less light equates to less energy usage, and increased anticipated lamp life. Technical and cost studies between the LED source and HPS were then re- evaluated with the new LED performance metrics, and results are summarized in the tables below. The LED source outperformed the HPS in most categories studied. Source Specification System Initial Efficacy Rated Lumen CRI CCT Wattage Lumens Lamp Depreciation Life (hrs) HPS Lucalox 138 9200 66 LPW 40,000 20% 25 2000K baseline LU100 /100 /SBY /D LED - Betal-ED 76 4472 59 LPW 131,000 15% IU 350mA 60/350mA/4300K Source Life Cycle Life Cycle Initial System Total Life Cycle Amortized Energy Cost Maintenance Cost Cost( *1) Annual Cost ( *2) Cost HPS $31,639.00 $53,729.00 $64,550.00 $149,918.00 $5,997.00 Baseline LED - 350mA 1 $15,333.00 1 $56,752.00 1 $41,602.00 1 $113,687.00 1 $4,547.00 • Figure 2.6, photographs taken at the Ford test site, illustrates the difference in color appearance and impact on visibility for the two sources. The white LED source clearly outperforms HPS. • Surveys were left at the site for community response. Two of the three responses collected supported the improvement in visibility and quality of light produced by the LED. The third response indicated that the LED was less desirable than HPS for the atmosphere in Vail. 5/18/2010 10-4-11 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan 100W HPS Source I �pN 60LED Source @350mA Figure 2.6 5/18/2010 10 -4 -12 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 3: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Objectives A. Improvements in Roadway Safety I. Improve Roadway Visibility a. The north and south frontage roads are arterial roadways shared by vehicles, public transportation, bicyclists, and pedestrians. They also serve as roadside parking when Vail Parking structures fill, which occurs 25 -30 times per year. Roadway visibility is key to safe use of the Frontage Roads in user conflict zones. b. Visibility deficits are key factors in a number of undesirable safety conditions. • Reduced potential for night -time collisions. • Aid to police protection and enhanced sense of personal security. c. Improved nighttime visibility facilitates driver confidence and encourages usage of private and public enterprises during the night -time hours, providing economic benefit to the community. 2. Assist motorists in anticipating and responding to traffic circulation and roadway transitions. a. Public Works recently submitted an updated Transportation Master Plan that responds to current and projected future growth and development studies for Town of Vail. The Transportation Master Plan recommends improvements to traffic management and access strategies along the frontage roads, including widening portions of the roadway and establishing turn lanes. The Frontage Roads Master Lighting Plan addresses night -time visibility strategies to parallel the Transportation Master Plan improvements. b. In addition to aiding in visibility, lighting is a visual cue that is easily recognized and interpreted. Light identifies roadway transitions and signals important driving decisions. The main village roundabouts and the west Vail roundabouts are well illuminated nodes that provide this type of signaling. They are memorable markers that help to orient the community. B. Support Objectives of Vail Lighting Ordinance and Environmental Stewardship 1 . Dark Sky a. With the adoption of a dark -sky ordinance in 2008, Vail is clearly championing the philosophy of dark -sky preservation. The ordinance governs the use of full cutoff light sources directed where needed and requires that light levels be the minimum needed for safety and security. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan is strictly in conformance with full cutoff criteria and minimum light levels for roadway safety. b. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan establishes zones of beneficial light, as described in "Part 2/B/2/b" and illustrated in "Part 4 /A ", at light levels appropriate for Town of Vail. The Lighting Master Plan supports sections determined to be best served by no new roadway lighting, to promote the accessibility of night time viewing. C. Patterns of light distribution along the frontage roads have been selected specific to the roadway configuration in each zone of beneficial light to optimize roadway coverage without light trespass. 2. Energy Efficiency a. The cost of procurement, utilization, and maintenance of a public lighting system is carried by the municipality. The Frontage Road Master Lighting Plan addresses the many variables to lighting systems that factor into the successful life time performance and cost of a roadway lighting system, including: • Usable life of the equipment and all associated parts • Durability of finishes • Efficiency of lamp sources and reflectors that house the source 5/18/2010 10 -4 -13 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan • Measurable performance of the source • Proper maintenance practices that may impact the life and performance of the equipment • Environmental factors that may impact life and performance of the equipment • Equipment design that may ease or hinder the economics of maintenance • Hazardous materials that may require special disposal b. Specific criteria for energy efficiency addressed by the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan include: • Life -cycle energy cost reduced compared to current Town of Vail standard municipal lighting standards. • Flexible control options that allow Town of Vail to adjust light levels in accordance with need. • Modular equipment design that can be easily retrofitted over time as advancements in technology provide greater efficiency and performance. C. Positive Aesthetic Impact 1 . Consistent Character a. While the Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan is not intended to direct the selection of lighting equipment outside of the municipal right -of -way, the standardization of roadway lighting applications will help guide the interface of current and future developments with Frontage Road access. b. The Lighting Master Plan defines the selection of equipment, including the roadway pole, pedestrian scale pole, and bike /pedestrian path bollard, for the Frontage Roads. In doing so, the visual impact of the lighting systems, by day or night, is consistent and replicates the visual language from east to west Vail. C. In taking a global approach, the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan controls light levels and the appearance of light in away that address both need /safety and balance with ambient light conditions in the community. In this way, roadway lighting can serve the community with the most desirable results. 2. Appropriate Light Levels a. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan includes adjustments in target light levels as defined by IESNA RP -8 -00 based on the following: • Field measurement of existing lighting levels in specific public right -of -way areas in Vail, as well as familiar private enterprise lighting installations. Refer to Appendix D for photographs and measured light levels at these location including: Village and West Vail roundabouts, I -70 off ramps at the roundabouts, Safeway parking lot, City Market parking lot, Donovan Park parking lot, and the intersection of South Frontage Road and Matterhorn Drive. • Observation, light level measurements, and community response for the selected LED pole mounted light installed as a test site at Ford Park. • Studies and community response from similar LED installations in the United States - refer to "Part 2 /E" for a summary of similar installations. 3. Color a. The color appearance of the roadway lighting system is a factor in successful performance of the system as well as acceptance within the community by residents, business enterprises, and visitors. The objective of the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan is to provide the best color characteristics of the light source used in roadway lighting to facilitate good night time vision. b. "Part 2 /D /b" explained CCT - the appearance of a light source as whiter /bluish or yellow /orangish - and CRI - the measure of a light source's ability to make people and objects appear as they would during daylight. c. The Frontage Roads Master Lighting Plan follows conclusive evidence that night time vision is improved under whiter /blue light sources (higher CCT and CRI) as compared to yellow /orange sources (lower CCT and typically lower CRI). One such study conducted by The Lighting Research 5/18/2010 10-4-14 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Center (LRC) /Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute is identified in Part 6 /Appendix A. The affects of higher CCT and CRI sources on night time visual functions include: • Targets in the field of vision are more easily detected • Peripheral vision is enhanced • Same or better visibility in low -light conditions, including lower roadway surface lighting • Enhanced sense of safety and security d. Supplemental lighting, such as the standard Village pedestrian lantern and bike path bollard, will be integrated with the roadway lighting to enhance the frontage roads with familiar color appearance and characteristic appeal. 4. Glare Control a. All light sources inherently produce glare, a function of the angle of light source distribution at a specific viewing angle. According to industry standards, glare is classified as either disabling or discomforting. b. Disability glare can impair the ability of a driver to perform necessary tasks. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan includes strategies to help mitigate the potential for disabling glare from roadway turn lanes and cross traffic access points. Strategies include: • Placement of poles so that source distribution angle is outside the visual field of the driver • Addressing lighting uniformity and contrast ratios to minimize visual adaptation between light and dark fields. C. Discomfort glare is an unwelcome by- product of bright light sources, although it is not considered to impair visibility. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan includes strategies to mitigate the potential for discomfort glare for residences and business enterprises with frontage road views. Strategies include: • Placement of poles so that the source distribution angle is outside the visual field of the viewer to the greatest extent possible. • Utilizing "backlight" shielding to eliminate light distribution behind the pole, where poles are installed adjacent to commercial and residential properties. • Limiting roadway lighting to sections of the frontage roads where it is most needed, an out of primarily residential zones. • Utilizing pedestrian lanterns in concert with roadway lighting where commercial enterprises are built to the property line shared by the frontage roads. 5/18/2010 10 -4- 15 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 4: Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan Recommendations A. Location of Equipment Along Frontage Roads 1 . Roadway Lighting Zones Strategy: Figures 4.1 , 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 illustrate the recommended strategy for zones of roadway lighting. The illuminance design basis for each of the four zone categories, as recommended in IESNA RP -8 -00 Table 2 for local roadway classification, is as follows. These are target illuminance values and may vary slightly in application depending on roadway and median configurations and conditions. Lighting Zone Traffic Description Target Target Target Pole spacing Designation Average Average Avg:Min ( *1) Illuminance Illuminance Uniformity - Roadway - Intersection (footcandle) (footcandle) High Zone Existing TOV roundabouts (based As required on field measurements) Medium Zone High volume, high activity, high 0.7 1.4 6:1 100' -1 50' conflict Low Zone High volume, medium activity, 0.4 0.8 6:1 150'-225' medium conflict Secondary Intermittent roadway 0.4 0.8 6:1 100' -1 50' Intersections intersections with enough volume, activity, and conflict p otential to justify lightin ( *1) pole spacing will vary within the zone depending on roadway and median configurations, and location of intersections. Strategy - Vail Village to Ford Park High Level Mid Level, 100' -150' spacing Low Level, 175'- 225' spacing Secondary Intersections i` Fiaure 4.1 5/18/2010 10 -4- 16 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Strategy - Village to Lionshead High Level Mid Level, 100' -150' spacing Not-- _ Low Level, 175'- 225' spacing NO— Secondary Intersections � w tz Figure 4.2 Strategy - Evervail High Level Lj ` - Mid Level, 100' spacing © 4 � -''i f/ Low Level, 225' spacing ° 4 Secondary Intersections � – 0 1 Figure 4.3 5/1 8/2010 10 -4 -17 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan High Level Strategy - West Vail Mid Level, 100' -150' spacing - Low Level, 175'- 225' spacing Secondary Intersections a 1 ° A o em ❑ °a 6 —0, 3 , 0 o 6 K/ � o Fiaure 4.4 /rb z'1 --,A 2. Placement of LED roadway lighting poles within the zone strategy, to achieve target illuminance and uniformity values, is guided by: • The roadway configurations for typical 3, 4, and 5 lane roadway sections, as proposed in the Master Transportation Plan. Primarily, roadway lighting pole placement is recommended on the Interstate side of the Frontage Roads to minimize installation cost and constructon impact. 4- land and 5 -lane roadway sections in Medium Zones, in some cases, require pole placement on both sides of roadway (and /or in the median) to provide sufficient illuminance and uniformity. • Proximity of roadway section to commercial and /or residential development property. Where direct glare from the roadway light cannot be mitigated by any other means, pole placement is recommended on the development side of the roadway so that the light source can be directed away from the property. • Viewing angles for motorist positions at turn lanes and stops. Pole position is offset by 60 degrees to mitigate potential for glare at fixed motorist positions. 3. Recommendation for placement of HPS decorative Village Lantern pedestrian pole is guided by: • Contribution to night time visibility for pedestrians. • Contribution to roadway illuminance where needed to supplement roadway lighting. • Contribution to character. 4. Recommendation for placement of low level bollards is guided by: • Convergence of city bike /pedestrian paths with moderately to heavily used intersections. 5/1 8/2010 10 -4 -18 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan 5. Dimensioned Lighting Layout Plans correspond to the Lighting Zone Strategy and to Photometric studies included in the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan, Part 10. Lighting Layout Plans included in the Lighting Master Plan are: • LD -1 West Vail Part 1 • LD -2 West Vail Part 2 • LD -3 West Vail Part 3 • LD -4 Timber Ridge Part 1 • LD -5 Timber Ridge Part 2 • LD -6 Lionshead Part 1 • LD -7 Lionshead Part 2 • LD -8 Lionshead Part 3 • LD -9 Vail Village Part 1 • LD -10 Vail Village Part 2 • LD -11 Vail Village Part 3 • LD -1 2 Vail Village Part 4 a. Dimensions shown are intended to reasonably predict placement of poles to achieve anticipated target light levels and uniformity. Prior to implementation, field conditions relative to pole placement must be reviewed and necessary adjustments to pole placement identified. Additional photometric studies are advised if pole placement requires adjustment of more than 10% of the dimension indicated in the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan. b. Dimensioned Lighting Layout Plans are based on roadway, right -of -way, public and private property apportionment as it exists or is anticipated at the time of Adoption of the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan. Future modifications to any of these may impact the feasibility of the Lighting Layout Plans, and further study of the frontage roads lighting plans must preclude the implementation. 6. Landscape material including trees, monuments, artwork, etc. that may be part of future frontage road planning and development should be coordinated with the Lighting Layout Plans to avoid creating obstructions that may interfere with anticipated performance of the frontage roads lighting systems. Refer to Part 8 /Appendix C /Details for diagrams which suggest clearances between lighting poles and landscape vegetation or features. 7. Refer to Part 8 /Appendix C /Details for recommended set -back of poles relative to roadway, bike -path, shoulder, and /or pedestrian walkways. B. Pole Recommendations 1 . Based on studies conducted and described in "Part 2: Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan Summary ", a 25' -0" pole for roadway lighting is recommended to capture cost benefits, minimize the visual impact of the lighting system, and minimize construction disturbance. 2. Manufacturer's Technical Specification Sheets for the following scheduled equipment are included in "Part 7: Appendix B ". 3. Design of structural base for the poles is not included in the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan. 5/18/2010 10 -4- 19 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Equipment Description Pole Pole Pole Finish Pole Accessories Designation Height Diameter Construction (* 1) P1 Village Pedestrian 12'-0" 4" Straight Steel Epoxy Primer 5 "h x 15.25"D Pole (24" and Black base cover. head on Electrostatic Optional GFI top) Powdercoat receptacle, planter Painted arms, irrigation Topcoat ( *2) P2, P3, P4, Roadway Lighting 25' -0" 5" Straight Steel Epoxy Primer 36 "H tapered cast P5 Pole and Black iron pole base, Electrostatic cast aluminum Powdercoat acorn finial Painted Topcoat Decorative Banner 14' -0" 4" Straight Steel Epoxy Primer 5 "h x 15.25"D Arm and Black base cover, 24 "L Electrostatic alum dual break - BAl Powdercoat away banner arms, Painted cast alum Topcoat decorative acorn finial BLl Bikeway Bollard 3' -8.5" 7.8" shaft Corten Steel Raw (appears NA shaft, cast rusty over iron head time) ( *1) Equipment designation is referenced on the Lighting Layout Plans and describes all components including the pole. ( *2) Planter Arm and receptacles are options that need to be discussed with Town of Vail planners prior to implementation of this Lighting Master Plan. C. Lamp Recommendations 1 . The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan recommends the 4300K LED lamp, operated at 350mA drive current, as the primary roadway lighting source for the performance benefits associated with the task of driving and for the life -cycle cost benefits. The complete life -cycle cost analysis is included in Part 8: Appendix B. Based on the analysis, the lighting system using the recommended LED source, compared to the High Pressure Sodium source which is standard to the Town of Vail, anticipates 52% less energy usage and a life -cycle cost savings of 25 %. 2. The High Pressure Sodium lamp, standard to the Village lantern and bollard, is recommended: • As a decorative element, where the warmer color appearance supports the aesthetic and character of Town of Vail. • For pedestrian zones where visual acuity is less critical than for the task of driving. • As a visual cue at roadway intersections where bike /pedestrian paths cross over. 3. Lamp characteristics for each of the pole /fixture assemblies are described in the following table. LED lamp specifications are integrated with fixture specifications. HPS lamp and ballast specification sheets are provided independent of the fixtures they are installed in. All Manufacturers' Technical Specification Sheets included in "Part 7: Appendix B ". 5/18/2010 10 -4 -20 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Equipment Description Lamp Source Wattage CRI (Color CCT (Correlated Designation Rendering Color ( *1) Index) Temperature) P1 Village HPS /LED (in 100W /1W 22 2000K Pedestrian Pole the decorative chimney) P2, P3, P4, P5 Roadway LED modules 60W (3 modules 70 4300K Lighting Pole with 20 LEDs at 20W each) each BLl Bikeway Bollard HPS 50W 22 2000K ( *1) Equipment designation is referenced on the Lighting Layout Plans and describes all components including the pole. 4. Operating voltage for lamps recommended in the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan are 1 20 -220V, and voltage will be verified with Town of Vail Public Works at the time of implementation. 5. LED lamps included in this specification are Generation C release product. At the time of implementation, the intent of the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan is to verify the most current LED product and modify the specification as required to compensate for improvements in technology. D. Fixture Selection 1 . Manufacturers' Technical Specification Sheets for all equipment identified in the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan are included in "Part 7: Appendix B ". 2. Fixture selection is manufacturer and product specific and may not be substituted. Where procurement of product is assigned to an exclusive supplier, the supplier and contact information is indicated on the Technical Manufacturers' Specification Sheet. 3. All fixtures selected and specified are UL and /or CUL listed. LED fixture selections are LM -80 -08 and LM -79- 08 tested (see Part 6:Appendix A for description of this test). Any modifications to the specification in the future will be listed and tested per these standards. 4. The Village Pedestrian Lantern (type P1) as presently specified and designed does not meet the full cutoff requirement of the Vail Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan does not address re- design of this standard Vail product, although it is our understanding that efforts are underway to investigate modifications to the lantern design that will meet full cutoff criteria. Verify the status of the Village Lantern specification prior to implementation of the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan. E. Controls System Criteria 1 . The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan recommends both unitized (local at the fixture) and system approach to controlling the operations of the roadway lighting. 2. Unitized control is achieved with a multi -tap (350mA and 525mA) power supply integral with the LED street fixture. The benefit to this option is that on a fixture by fixture basis the light output can be adjusted to a higher or lower output to compensate for lumen depreciation over time and to set groups of fixtures for specific roadway conditions should that become desirable. With this control option, a multi -level control scheme can also be implemented wherein groups of lights can be switched between lower and higher output either automatically or manually. The multi -tap option is included in the Manufacturers' Technical Specifications for LED roadway fixture types P2, P3, P4, and P5, in "Part 7: Appendix B ", as well as the wiring diagram for the 350mA and 525mA driver settings. 3. System control is achieved with a programmable solid -state relay panel that automatically turns groups of lights on and off based on a programmed schedule or as a manual function through network technology. The Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan recommends the following characteristics and requirements for the system controls: a. The Relay Panel will be pre - assembled, UL /CSA listed, and separate from the electrical distribution equipment utilized to power the frontage road lighting. Manufacturer for the equipment will be approved by Town of Vail. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -21 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan b. Relays will be low voltage lighting control relays, fully rated for 20A and suitable for all lamp types. Each relay will have a molded case containing terminals for both low voltage signal wiring and line voltage power wiring. Each relay shall have an integral means for manual operation. Relays will be capable of being automatically controlled in groups and simultaneously controlled by individual override. Relays shall have a built in status indicator that can be monitored by a networking technology. Relay status shall be accomplished by the same signal wiring as is used to carry the on /off signal. C. Relay panels will have the capability to be networked to other relay panels and /or other programmable control systems supported by Town of Vail. The networking capabilities and preferences of Town of Vail will be coordinated with the networking capabilities of the specified Relay Panel. d. Relay groups (lights that operate together on a unique relay) shall be approved by Town of Vail Public Works prior to installation of circuiting for roadway lighting systems. General parameters for lighting group development are: • Distinct luminaire types - roadway poles, Village Lanterns, and bollards - shall be grouped independent of each other. • Relay groups shall be limited to their distinct Lighting Zone as illustrated in the Zone Strategy diagrams, Figure 4.1 through 4.4 above. • Roadway lighting for intersections (poles positioned in the intersection and including the turn lanes) within a distinct Lighting Zone shall be grouped independent of the remainder of the roadway lighting in the Lighting Zone, unless otherwise approved by Town of Vail Public Works. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -22 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 5: Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Approval Documentation The Vail Frontage Road Master Lighting Plan as described herein is adopted by Resolution xxx, on xxx, 2010, by the Vail Town Council following a recommendation to approve by the Planning and Environmental Commission. Future amendments to this master plan must be approved by resolution or motion by the Town Council following a formal recommendation by the Planning and Environmental Commission. Implementation activities and ordinances will be approved in accordance with the Town of Vail Municipal Code. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -23 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 6: Appendix A A. Standards, Studies, and Guidelines Referenced 1 . IESNA RP -8 -00 /REAFFIRMED 2005 American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting • The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (www.iesna.org) is a collegial national community with membership derived from diverse backgrounds including designers, manufacturing, contractors, distribution, utilities and energy services, government, and education. • The mission of IESNA is to improve the lighted environment through research and education. IESNA publications are developed through the consensus standards development process approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). IESNA is not brand affiliated. • RP -8 -00 is prepared by the Standard Practice Subcommittee of the IESNA Roadway Lighting Committee. 2. ANSI C1 36.16 -2009 NEMA /ANSI Standard for Roadway and Area Lighting (www.nema.org /stds /C1 36.cfm) • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) are both organizations engaged in developing technical standards for product development, production, distribution, and utilization to impact safety, economics, and performance. 3. IDA Lighting Code Handbook V1. 14 (www.darksky.org) • International Dark -Sky Association (IDA) is a 501(c) (3) nonprofit organization engaged in education about and advocacy for the preservation of the nighttime environment specifically through utilization of quality outdoor lighting. IDA is considered a leading authority concerning problems and solutions related to light pollution. 4. IESNA LM -80 -08 Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric Measurements of Solid State Lighting Products • Specifies procedures for measuring total luminous flux, electrical power, luminous efficacy, and chromaticity of SSL luminaires and replacement lamp products. 5. IESNA LM -79 -08 Approved Method for Measuring Lumen Maintenance of LED Light Sources • Specifies procedures for determining lumen maintenance of LEDs and LED modules (but not luminaires) related to effective useful life of the product. 6. U.S. DOE Gateway Program: Demonstration Assessment of Light- Emitting Diode (LED) Roadway Lighting. (http://wwwl.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ssl/gatewaydemos.html) • DOE GATEWAY Demonstrations showcase high - performance LED products for general illumination in a variety of commercial and residential applications. Demonstration results provide real -world experience and data on state -of- the -art solid -state lighting (SSL) product performance and cost effectiveness. These results connect DOE technology procurement efforts with large- volume purchasers and provide buyers with reliable data on product performance 7. Lighting Research Center, Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute, "Mesopic Street Lighting Demonstration and Evaluation Final Report ", by Peter Morante, published December 2008 ( lighting .Irc.rpi.edu /researchAreas /pdf /Groton Final Report.pdf) Standards and Guidelines applicable to Roadway Lighting and /or technologies specified within this master planning document that are forthcoming are listed as follows. Town of Vail is advised to review these documents as well as other technical papers generated in the future which may represent advancements in criteria and performance of roadway lighting systems. • NEMA SSL -1 Driver Performance Standard for Solid State Lighting • IESNA TM -21, Technical Memorandum regarding the method of estimation of LED Life • IESNA LM -XX1 , Approved method for the measurement of high power LEDs. B. Similar LED Roadway Lighting Applications Solid -state LED roadway lighting is a relatively new technology, gaining in effective performance and popularity. There are similar applications of LED roadway lighting installed nationwide by municipalities and the U.S. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -24 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Department of Energy to compare the LED and HPS sources for cost and quality of lighting. These applications are summarized below, and can be further reviewed by sourcing the web links identified. 1. Ouray, Colorado: i. LED retrofit of low- pressure sodium street lighting on Main Street to 80LED, 6000K, 30' -0" poles. Installed 06/2009. ii. Has been well received by retailers, residents, municipality, and guests. 50% energy savings anticipated, with a 2 year payback. iii. Comments: "Nighttime sky more visible "; New lights are "more pleasing to the eye ". iv. http : / /www.ledwaystreetlights.com /benefits- case- studies.htm1 2. Groton, Connecticut: i. Mesopic (night visual adaptation) Street Lighting Demonstration and Evaluation: study of white source (MH) versus yellow source (HPS), 25' -0" mounting height, residential neighborhood, 120'-140' spacing. ii. Based on survey including police personnel and residents with a 68% response, most respondents identified a noticeable improvement in security, visual clarity, aesthetic preference, natural look of vegetation for the white light source compared to the HPS yellow source. iii. Lighting .Irc.rpi.edu /researchAreas /pdf /Groton FinalReport.pdf 3. City of Ann Arbor, Michigan: i. Initial pedestrian pole retrofit (in 20070, followed by a 60LED replacement of roadway cobra -head lights ii. 4.4yr payback, 50 -80% less energy. iii. Response from the community has been overwhelmingly position. 81 of 83 positive responses identified improvement in light quality, reduced light trespass (better control). iv. http: / /www.a2dda.org /dda- achievements /led- street - lights/ 4. City of Greensburg, Kansas: i. Rural setting, replace all streetlighting (303 total fixtures) using 60LED and 80LED, completed Feb 2009. ii. Estimating 70% energy and maintenance savings iii. "Residents have all positive things to say about the LED fixtures. Quality of light on the roadways is greatly improved and people really like the sleek look of the fixtures." There is more night sky exposure. iv. http : / /www.ledwaystreetlights.com /benefits- case - studies.html 5. City of Anchorage, Alaska: i. Began in 2008 to replace HPS cobra heads. Anticipating 50% energy savings. ii. "We have conducted a conference and public survey that indicated that our residents overwhelmingly approve of the new white LED lighting." iii. http : / /www.ledwaystreetlights.com /benefits- case - studies.html 6. Lija Loop, Portland, OR: i. (DOE Gateway project) 100W HPS replaced with LED. Reduced horizontal photopic illuminance by 53 %- this resulted in good payback and energy savings of 55 %. 30' poles, 125' - 150' spacing. Cobra heads. 40% less light with the LED than the HPS. ii. Anticipating 20yr payback for retrofit, 7.6 yr payback for new installations. iii. 36% response to survey, 90% of respondents to survey (residents) either recognized an improvement in quality of light or no difference - improved visibility and coverage. Negative responses identified issues with brightness and glare, source appeared too blue. iv. http: / /wwwl.eere.energy.gov/ buildings /ssl /gatewaydemos - results.html 7. City of San Fransisco, California: i. (DOE gateway project) Residential sunset District, replaced 100W HPS on 24' -34' poles with LED, 50 % -70% energy savings over HPS (studied 4 different LED heads), 150'-200' spacing, 40% decrease in photopic illuminance. ii. Simple payback new installation 3.7 - 6.3 years iii. More uniform light - 30% better uniformity, and 30% less overall light. Lots of no opinion /do not know/ no change opinions which the district has interpolated as LED is an equal replacement to HPS. Good quantitative light performance resulted in positive customer perception of lighting performance. iv. http: / /wwwl.eere.energy.gov/ buildings /ssl /gatewaydemos - results.html 8. City of Minneapolis, Minn, 1 -35 Bridge: 5/18/2010 10 -4 -25 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan i. (DOE gateway project) Most comprehensive study of HPS and LED to date. Read reports available on website for further details. ii. http: / /wwwl.eere. energy. gov / buildings /ssl /gatewaydemos_results.html 5/18/2010 10 -4 -26 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 7: Appendix B 7. Manufacturer's Technical Specification Sheets 1. Included in this Appendix are the most current Technical Specifications as of the date of Master Plan approval for each product specified as part of the Frontage Roads Lighting Master Plan. Prior to implementation, all Technical Specifications will be verified with Manufacturer and newer editions of the Specification submitted to Town of Vail, identifying updates and modifications, for review. 2. There will be no substitutions for specified products, or any options and components included in the Technical Specification for the product. 3. Material suppliers, where listed, are single source unless otherwise approved by Town of Vail. 5/1 8/2010 10 -4 -27 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P1 Notes: Banner Arms, Duplex Receptacle, and Irrigation Page 1 of 1 Provisions are options to review with TOV Supplier: U.S. Long Life Contact: Jack Mason, cu fl ers @aol.com; 1- 888 - 295 -2677 UBL440 DECORATIVE HEYAGON LAAn'ERN FABRfC'ATED FROM 1-EAVY' GAUGE �. ALUMINUM SHEETMETAL — - (PLEASE SEE DETAIL MVG.j i —COVER -� DRIP LINE ACCESS DOOR. (2 REQ. LOCATED 1 1 I II it i I � I RUBBERGROMMEr 19' I I _ III III (2 REQ.} `ITII DI�LEx �GFl• RECEPTACLE I I I I I•A DETAIL VIEW I ,. I J SEEDETAIL(DA -- DECORATIVE STEEL DUAL ARM ASSEMBLY HANGING' PLANTER HOLDER SECURED WITH WS EYE BOLT 01i irt f r 013 V4" BASE PLATE 1x =p 4'0 x .1zs sT�L TUBE �.. LISL CS01 CLASH SHE BABE COVER �' `` y4• BOLT CASTALUMINUM J" 10141' I _ _— 07 V2' TYP. — - ACCESS DOOR j f I -- 45" ACCESS HOLE 1 MOUNTING DETAIL MOUNTING SLOT FOR WO ANCHOR BOLT 101 15 11410 X 911 CAST ALUM. WITH NOMINAL RANGE 2 PC. BASE COVER 71re THRU 11 117 DIAMETER I — STEEL BASE PLATE (( 4 EQ. SPACED) ) GROUND LINE W4'0 H 17 "L XTLEG GALVAN REO STEEL ANCHOR BOLT (4 REQUIRED) revision #2 base cover date: 0210412010 mvisicn #1 pale ht. to 12' -0" date: 0112012010 1 UL LISTED U.S Longlife Inc. Ptt JE Town of Vail Colorado 2021 Bridgetown Pike, PART# USL440.100HPS(USLC591 (MODIFIED) Feasterville, PA 19003 °°^ N.T.S. 2e 1 P "''' T.B.D. 1115110 2 a 2 5/18/2010 10 -4 -28 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P2 Notes: Page 1 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A STRIWY- f Type Da 01/15/99 BetaLED Catalog #: STIR - LWY - 4M - HT - 06 - C - UL - SK - 43K - 354 - SC Res t 13111njne Haneg l I:I(c: fi �n171 "22.0' H otes: [765 1 1. Mou nter! on a 3' -0 -ass Arm (b US Vong I Ito} 2.Multi- lap Llriver(Wlred for '35OrnAinitially) 3- Black finish 4.43O0K Color Temp [ [Y rim I S. Door So rely Tether 6- Na Backlight Control �- Product Family Opllc Mounting t1 of LEDs LED Yottage Color Facloiv lllslatliM Options (s 1 D ) Series Oplums inns in r nllally on the lines pry Od s bone STIR LIMY 13 4M' HT 13 G EII1L El Sit 13350 &,UmA D[IVa Currem K3 41 13 0 5 Universal Shisr' ®4:39 000K G akin Tom pasture 13 05 120 -2774 13 OK 13700 T0UmA Qnvp GOrrerd' 0UH Black' E3 DIM 0-1 uV Dimming! ° Universal O R7 E3 F Fuse" 347 Ilrall7r' © HL M ow (17565025, dual UFr.Ull inpu l) "a.rr 13 P5 E3 N No rluidk. Drsconnai Harness or Lce'olurg Bubble" Platinum E3 PD Power Door" 1 e Inon70 E3 R NFMA Photocell Recepraelo [3WH E3 SC Door Safoty Tether" White! Click Mere for Uli li ly option or additl anal options, scc IP66 spur sh act Footnotes 1 11"" 1313¢ lV Medium dl8lnapaen 7. Dover ope rates at 700mA ms lead of the standard 525mA 14.51andard product leatums unless N option Is studied, door clips 2 tESHA. Type IV Medium dlsl nbellan whit bukligm conlrel prneWid a higher Inman output and a 5h0 +let li to not included 3. Hornor,141 tenon movrll t Control by others 15. All corrections between dear and exlme are shipped unconcealed 4 Light engine be, ran or extension Is col palmed and will remand g please onsull laclory for avada61h ly Irani the M01DW; most release spring included l0 open door natmal elumamun regardless or color selection 10. Not variable war G option lltlal V Voltage Is selected arno nancally vAnn the latches are n1ta M 5. DAVE! operates at 350rnA Instead 61 rile s.tandam 525mAgImiddng 71 W1 VaHable - am Vvollage Is selected 16 Hinge relu ruing clips net included as part of this option a Me r lumen output and a longer [Ile 12. Refer 10 mull laud spec Sheet for rrq re, Iniomlad call on t7. 5talnless steel al rcfalt Ca B Color Ir.melsra irre per fix lure. mlmmum 70 CAI 13. Sensor not Included 1 PERFO Innlal Del lilare5 In Mull DellVered dot Initial Delivered 0 U G Lumens -Type IY A U G 9 Delirored B U 6 Lumens -Type IY B U'�'0 ' Total Tvlal Total FVaeni Tmlal Total L „Hours° Lumens -Fype ly Lumens -Type IV Watts Current Current culled Walls Cuerent Currenl 25'`C LEDs Medium rr} OackllgM Medium rl'Oar:kllgh! Medium •W 6000N CaidF613P 6ec6K Medlurn � 4aceK Comral 8r dappK 12e -277Y �y 1264 dr P30Y �dT 2774 307 -d80N' k4' 36FVI •F 48eY 177- F} Rating "' RaEing"` Raling "' Boeing" rr. 40 3,519 {04} 1 1 1 2,Y31 It41 1 0 1 1 9081 {04) 1 1 1 ?401(114} 1!'1 4i 940 0.22 0 ?(! a:3 UI5 016 153,000 bill 4..301(05) 1 1 1 3,346(05) 1 1 1 3,173 {05) 1 1 1 2.g39f05} 1 11 1 C4 0.53 0.29 0.25 /0 0 -20 0 -19 141,000 60 6,1G2 {06} 2 1 1 4,011 {U6) 1 1 1 4,127(06) 1 1 1 U,21 (116) 1 1 1 76 U.62 0.34 039 $1 0.23 030 131,000 aid) Fix the Opel aling A 2S G 17 F) 1 A04.116I(4} 7 9 1 3,fi68 (O41 1 I I 4.136 {04) 11 1 :3•.711 {04} 1 11 10 059 0.32 028 iii 077 0?0 96.000 50 6,7G4 {05) 1 1 -0.483fO5) 1 1 9 5,0{,6(05) 2 111 3.532105) 1 1�1 95 0.80 0.42 0.3t "n 101 0.25 024 13511 60 G.917 Ali) I2 2 2 5.30() f043) 1 1 2 6J1137 "it") 2 2 4,719{06} 1 1 1 11:3 t,94 0,511 0.42 119 lJ 34 1 027 79. t r 40 5,772(04) 211 1 4,485(04) 1 1 1 5,062 (139) 2 1 1 3,53YIO4} 3 1 1 98 0.83 0. -09 8.31 104 0.30 0.29 65,000 5U 7;014 (OS} 2 2 2 1,4$7 {U1) 11 F G,1$7 fO1) 2 2 2 4,812 toll 1 1 1 124 1.04 0.55 0.90 131 11.38 ():313 Sii nO11 30 0 465 fll6V 7!2 7 6SB4 HIti1 . 1 '1 7 742 1 {N1 7 7 71 5775 fII6) 1 F 7 146 PY:3 054 054 154 044 , ' Urillexsn . vii.! I. . nI,I'I , . , n 11 71.1:.1 F!:I •:II � 1:itr;C aI TI.i -1a -r 91.1 . u� e 2010 BeIal-ED ", a division or Ruud Lighling • 1200 92nd Slreel • Sturtevant, WI 53177 • 800 -236 -5800 • www- LEDwaySlreellighis -corn Ma[1e fR the U, 5 A_ U{ U_ S, and inllmlrari fki rlS- � Meels Boy American requirements wilhin the AM 5/18/2010 10 -4 -29 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P2 Notes: Page 2 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A ' St Me ME- 01/15109 General Desrlriptfen Finish Fixture housing is all aluininurn constuGhat Standard Wine utilizes ter initial block for Exclusive Golor fast DelfaGuard'° finish features an E Cot epoxy primer vidInan ullia power input suitable for 62 #14 AVJG wire and aerates A 525mA Drive currant is held dnrabla silver powder topcoat, providing exeel.larit resistanca to oarrosipn, ullrauiNal swilchablo on 40, 511 and 61) I1 D units Off & 60 1113 ands require two drrrors) fixtrlro rs degradation and abia men Bronze, black, white and platinum bron7n povrder t(ppnatS are designed to mount an 1.25' I (1.675' O.O.I andlm 2' IP (2.375' 0.0.) horizontal tenon and also available. The Imsh is coverod by our 19 year limited vrarranty is adiustable ei S° to allow far fixture leveling (inGlud as lwidirrg bubble to aid in this - process). Fixture carries a limited Ova yaar warm my Fixture and finish are anduranca tetrad to withstand 5.000 hours Df alavalgd ambient raft fog conddkons as dolmid in AS IM Standard D 117 Electrical Mod Misr design accommodates varied lighting output from high pnwar, while, 6000K Testing & Compliance 500K per lull lecture), minimum 70 GRI, long life LED sources. 12LI -277V 59160 Hc, LI1 . listed in the tl S and Canada for Ivor locationfi Consult factory for Cf Certified Class 1 LED drivers are standard. &17 A80V 50 ?99 Vk option is available. LED drivers have products Rol IS coral ant Meats GAL liens 611 Vibration lasting and i,l1- 61 -GGRE power factor >90% and THD t2M at hill load UmN pfmided with integral 9kV surge Section 4.4 1 r 4 2 Eartlluuake Cone 4. International Dark -Sky Association approved. supprossionprotection standard Hoick discormad harness suitable for mate and break under load W ovldod on power load Le darer for peso of rnarnlanance. Surge urolectron Palerds tested in ii ordance with IEEE C62 41.2 and ANSI standard 62.412: US and mterR3tlnlAl patenls grarded and pending llnfal l [) 1& a dn'ISron of Tluud lighting, Inc.. ter a 11 si1ng el trued Lrghhng, Inc. patmils, visit ver—k u splo. guy Field-Installed Accessories Bird Spikes for Light Engine flit- Spikes 1IgG Housing Q 1iA- I:mihSPK6e � %A- lid'111SPKI I$G Photometries LEDway' EPA & W®ighl Calcul iliens ;'s„ 50• IST $• 1'50, APPaximate 5 Weight 120 -27711' n 4g-B0IE1)hKtilre 160lbs. EPA Hor¢oMal Tenon Mould 1 fhture. a 60:-i Bo°— 1 .. . _ .• EPA Round External Moult I Square Internal Mount Horizontal Tenons with Fiadue(s) - 6d• - PT.Pl) I Smija u 411 P1 ?FV -2H(W) 50' Twin 1.189 PUW- 2H(1E19) 189° Twin 1 ,5 1 N) Carldireat e i Caadlapowr Tra ce: 1 m.1 plmc 9u° hnnl ar S•; 3ff' hor¢onal enge atmartmam [an PT, -:g if W) SLY Triply t T 14 Independem lesnn8 laboraratics u li li to It sl F[purl No PPFLIMINARY Pl ?HI- 011(1711) IPIP firifilff 1 5911 ITL63r75. Candle -¢ewer [race tit 84@ @K, d0 LED Type IV Medium Candlepower imoe of Type IV Medium L40 lummiure With PYID 41-1(40) 90' Quad 2.118 sImd,ghl lummai:o with S Il ?8 inns; delivered hmens beekllghl aa[Ilrel. 'Add 1 ILS' r nini %t , r m W.' AAOV r:x uP ep6mlingal 52SraA All Patdlrbed temmalra Photometric telling per armed to IESNA LM B - 88 standards. cT du _ 30' 69' gp• 80 u i I 1 :�1 — I U @RB LINL � 61 .r. ..i. PRELIMAKAY Isoteoromd!Fe plot v1 CU00K. 60 LEO Type IV Medium streetlight lammaire wIf backlight control at 2$' A.F.G. Luminai re with (. r Cm 6.1 122 193 $.4B@ rn Mal 4811yefee IUnamS Opermng al 52$MA. Im1131 FO at Pasifen al.iri l r Pride 01 manmwn canes UOx¢ -. lmloorcandle plot .1 6000 K, $0 LED Type IV Medium streNllghl Iarnlnam a al 25' A.l Wmrmare win 6,917 Initial delivered 0 Ivnens aperalinq at 525mA. In11iaB FC at grade. ray 2010 Bel aLE0` -, a division of Buud Lighting +'1200 42nd Street w Slurlevaad, WI 53177 • 800 -gas -6800 + www.LEDwa4StreetIights -co in � AAade in fee U.S.A. ctt U.S. and imported pa71s. L Mecls Ouy American requiremerifs wilho the ARM 5/18/2010 10 -4 -30 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P3 Notes: Page 1 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A 1 f Type III Medium Da 01/15/99 BetaLEC Catalog #: STIR - LWY - 3MB - HT - 66 - C - UL - SK - 43K - 354 - SC Res t 1311 lnjee Har;el Notes: [fir 1 1. Mounted on a 2'-0`,Mast Arin o1 US Long t ife) 1.Multi•klpdriver(Wired for 3S9mAinitial1y) 3- Black Finish 4.4300K (I Tern p [ [ 47' s I S. Door Safety Tether 6- With Backlight Control Product FantlbJ OOIIC Mounling.. #of LEDs LEO Voltage Color FdCIoiV III Options ( Series Op11Lnff Inns In n,anllally on Inc Imes pr a b o v e STH LWY 13 3M' HTa 13 G EII1L 13 SV 13350 &,Omit Drive Curr91rl p 311W 1305 flnivergal Sih er' ® 4:39 00011K Golor Tom perahare A05 120 - 2T7V C3 11K 13700 TOUrnA Drive GUrrerd' 10UH Black' 13 DIM 0--10Y Dimming! ° Universal 13 R E3 F Fusers 3A7 Ilrnllzr' ® HL FiA..ow (1175)35025. dual count input)" Is [] 1`6 13 N No Quick. Dlsconnw l lawless of LDVelurg Bubble" Plalinum 13 PD Power Door"" Broluee E3 R WIM Photocell Ri ceplacla'o 13WH Q SC Nor5alehr folher" white' Clickllvle for Utility option for additiowl options, gee IP66 spec. shoot Footnotes 1 Ik SNA ly I :•' 'rII.I nit nSIC a1) of llre standard g2SnJ. 14. $landaril product leaw!es unites. N opt on ie s, {ecnhed; door ClGps 2 IISNA Type 111 fdcdnum dr::' :.:. .'I uiih Wrl ip111 CMIMP pi -c"Mrp a nlgnel output end a shorierllle nor included 3 Horizontal tenon moan 1. 8. Control by ethers 15. All cMnecllons eelween door end Insure int shipped unconnecled 4 Light engine po rhen of exl iu-n Is not pan led and will renne 9 ple85e pensull lecl y' for w2ilupill ly lrom the factors. doer raleSaY spring Included to open doer I atural aluminum regardlc pl Co1ar Satecgen 10. Nat aVadaGle mah HL opban when VH voltage is Wtckif aulnmalirallp xdln she 131ch.s are rtleased S paver operate; a1 4oma Irsread 01 the 3landa rd 525MA pronding 11 rd'it available what UIR ml last is selected 15 Hinge ratdnlrQ clips not Included w part of Ills option a leyeer IumeJr output aid a. longer [Ile 12. FI 10 III fowl spec Shoat let rip re Inlolrna on !7 $Iainl u Steel al rcroll Cahlt 6. color terripersrure per riklure. minimum 70 CRI 13. Seeger not indvded A PERFOR Initial Delivered In Kial Oetiyered In lttal Delivered n U C. e 0 G initial Delhmred 6 0 G B U G System Total Total Total Syrlum Total Total L „Neura” It o1 Lumens TypB Ill Lumens — FypB Ili Lumens — Type 111 Lumens —Type 111 walls Current Current Current VAI Durant Current 42FC LEDs Medium ern nackllDm Medium w'f iniallgh[ Medium' #6DCDK GOTI 4RUCK Medium dr d3gOK Control I43DDK 320 —F77Y -# lsuy 4130V �PIiY s4'f- aeoY "3t 347Y 21480V (77- F) RB[mg "' Flailing— Ra11nJ "` 1 Ir 40 3,470 (04) 1 1 1 ?.75'4 {flit) 0 t 1 3,049 {0A) 1 1111 .22i (114; i•. 7 I 41 (1 40 0.77 020 h3 � 0N, 01f, 163, 00f1 i3O -0.248 {051 2 !'t 2 3 180 {057 V 1 1 ?,,724 {051 2 2' 2 1 2 r r US} I I;q V.53 17 29 1)'£:i 71) V.2V tl] 19 141,1700 60 5,098 (06) 2 2 2 3 023 { {ll3 1 '7 1 4,472 {06Y 2 2 `I " 35d f Oct 11 62 0 54 U 2D 01 [123 420 131,O0U r - . AO 4.13 MIN 2'2 21 3A9 ?n�l� 9 An&', {^ O i l , , �n 3�.1,4;I! I II s9 0.32 0.29 76 I 0 - 22 220 96.000 i 4 +J3 .. ii 130 OA2 0.36 101 U. 0.24 135,1101) 7' i.�� 17 ? haJT +:;� Iq . :Ii I I 11.• 0!A OSII 1147 II 1034 {3 2Y 1911011 40 5, 7(t1) {114) 2 'L 2 4,275µl4) 1 2 1 S.OUi) {i)4'I 2 2!2 3.751.1 111)4.) l 2 1 5 tl 133 0.44 U37 104 ! 0.30 0.24 65 5•'t n:i. ? '' 7 5,775 i05j 1 2 7 li.111 fil5y 7 7! ?' 4 3ILIS} 1 7 1 1'14 1 lW i) 55 U 4(4 131 1 0'40 17 30 56.000 J .. .n.. '• fl. 7ill fo131 1 3 7 7$3 &013) 7 T 7 aivll it (IIn" 1 1 7 2 14n _ 1 23 0134 0 54 IlA )A4 0 al 50.000 1' -r t;' '.1; is I rrial n•,n In I . ' E: V I I I tI.I I ' re' rlalln7 ,:r�'LI, d' u� e 2010 9elal-ED a division of Ruud Lighling • 1200 92nd Slreel • Slurtewanl, W153177 • 000 -236 -4906 • www- LEDwaySlreelii0his -cam M.xrle in the 1)..S. /a. ur V-4. and im {narde6r {]arts- � Meets Ffuy American reapunurr d5 wrfhirr tha ARf1A 5/18/2010 10 -4 -31 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P3 Notes: Page 2 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A 1 e ht — Type III Medium Rev. t. L Ir General 0escriplian Finish Fixture housing is all aluminum consbuctimn. Standard fixture utilizes terminal block Par Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard• finish features an E Coat epoxy primer w'ithan ultra power input suitable for 0• /14 AVJG wire and operates at V6nlA Drive current is field durable silver powder topcoat. providing axcellant resistanca to corrosion, ullfavindel swilchthle on 40, 50 and Std LED units (All 0 60 111) ands require two dnver%) I Ixure rs dogradatlon and abrasion IAewc- black, white and platrmiln bronze power topcoats am duslgned to mount on 1.25' IP (1.675' O.fJ.I and. +or 2' IP (2.375' D.D.) horuonlal tenon and also a%adable. The knish is covered by our 11) ydar Iunded warranty. is adjustable 1I V to allow fa fixture leveling (includes leveling bubble to aid in this prococs) Fixture Carlos a li mdad Five year warranty Fixture and finish are endurance lasted to wifhmland '000 hourm otedevated ambient =11 too Conddmnsas doltnod In AS IM Standard It 117 Electrical Mod 11 far design accommodates vaned lighting oufpul from hl gh pmv or, whoa, 60001( Tesling & Compliance (.I- 500K per lull imture), minrrnuul 70 CRI, long life LED sources. 121)-277Y 5UIfil3 Hr, Ill listed in the ll S and Canada for wet locations Consult factory for Cf Certified Class 1 LED drivers are standard. 347 A80V 10?80 It option is available. LED drivers have products I0119 compliant. Meats CAI, Trans 611 Vibraboll Testing and Glt- 63 -0131 power factor a90Y and THD OfM at full load JJni[s provided with integral KV surgg Sertmn 4.4.115.4.2 Earlhnuaku [one 4. Ingintatlonal Dark -Sky Association approved. zupprossian prolachwit standard Dlnck discennacl harness sutable for math and break e reder two provided on power leod to driver for ease e1 rnaintenance. $urge protuctmn Patens tested in accordance with IEEE C62.41.2 'and ANSI slandaid 02.41.2 11 S. and international pateift granted and pending Hotel .ID Is a da -lsion of flood tlghhng, Inc. For a listing of Ruud Lighting, Inc. patents, alert w Field - Installed Accessories : El n Bird Spika lot Light Engi ne Bird Spikes Kit Ier Horsing %A -III OASPI(60 T]XA- 0ItlMWKII Photomalries LEDway" EPA & Weight Calculations 15CP -F�� r 50' 19 58° Apprexinrate \ We' Its 40-60 LED Extent 16.0Ibs. 2 \ X 126 2. -� % 2 EPA _ Horizontal Tenon Mount t fixl4l16 0 6133 EPA Round External Mount I Squaw Internal Moen Horizontal Tenons With Ffa7rrots( 6 PPrQ 1H Single 0.905 f I'VI'D- 21 1(0rl) 9U Twin 1 109 r PTIf7J 7H(180) ISDI Twin 1590 Caedlepover Trace: veil al War: Candlaeoarin Tioeft'Vemeel plane d"'llil hvmaanral male p1 rranrrum cm d , 3 hon&amd angle al oemmlm Mdepcwer PTIPID 1(90) 90P Triple 1 754 Inddpendenr Tasung Labowones arced rest igtrl N5. PRELIMINARY PTIPID- N(121)) 12(1'Triple 1.590 I TLO286 Carditpower trace of 0709: ^:, At LK r;po II' dledlum gadleint - f Irate 01 Type ill Willem LED Iurnmaiffe xarh ("T1i43 "90) $[P Quad 2170 aneellrphI won P. uve 4F. I I : - red -r s eackllgm Control dd 5 I S or rrae5 armb r in 8 finlere4 cpe ri ling w s25. A Atli puked dl iu pre ph r metric turner penetmed to IE8 kA LIA-7 9-08 Ma n dards. 7aillon a l w rinuil -Ix R1 M&O"InJm G3nllrt %Mr 100' 80' 80' 40 20' d' 20" 4p' .. fn' no s0' .. 0' 210' . nr ^a4 ed. ':��•la3 123 GI urn 0 - - - Gm CUA9 dl 26 G9 24.4 18.a 122 51 Rn 61 122 188 24.4 PRELIMINARY i:oleelCendie plot. of GOOK. $0 LED Type lit Mel1i um 21ree Info ... .. 122 l63 24A +i. minaln wllh dacklrphd cmlml al25' A.F.G. Luminalre wllh 44 ,ef•r a x:41 lVW Y, C� LIC ripe 111 Medium slreell: m 5.123 Innlaf de rve red lumenr [perallnr a1525mA. In111a1 FC al r grade ominaire ar 25' Ak.O Lumlrtaare win 6,s31 lnlual detlNErcd omens opa'rating at 625mA. Imual FC at gna t A " (D 2010 Betat-En'v, a division of Ruud Lighting • 1208 92nd Street • Sturtevant, WI 53177 • 800 -236 -6800 • wkrw.LEDwayStreetldghls.cam A 0 Made in the U_ SA_ ai U.S. antl impt3rPed parts. LEGS Maps Boy A:merivan requimmords within the ARRA. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -32 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P4 Notes: Page 1 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A 1 f 1' III Medium r- 01/15/99 BetaLEC Catalog #: STIR - LWY - 3MB - HT - 66 - C - UL - SK - 43K - 354 - SC Res t Igtl fnlnr Hem;rg rlar:e; Notes: [ 1 I. Mounted on a 3' -l3` Wass Arm (by US Vong L IN) 2. Multi Up Driver(wired for 3SDnlA initially) 3. Blank finish 4.4300K Color Tenn p [ I2I nn 1 5. door Safety Tether 6. NO Racklight Control �- Product FinnIhJ Dplic Mounling #of LEDs LEO Yoftage Color FWoin III Options (KID) Series Op11Dlls Ions In n, nllally on the lines provi s bove STH LWY 13 3M' HTa 13 G pUL El sv 13 350 &,Omit II Current 23 3M B 1305 llnineergal Sih nr' ® 4:39 00011K Golor Toni parahare 1305 120 - 2T7V E3 11K E3 7go TOUrnA Drive CUUNIT1 10UH Black' E3 DIM D-1 DY DimmIngj° Universal 13 82 E3 F Fusers 147-16DV ilrnmr.' ® HL fYA..ow (175)3501525, dual crrcwl inPu I) Ir Is 13 1`6 E3 N No Quick. Disconnaa:t I larnpss or Lea'elurg Bubble" Platinum 13 PD Power Door"" Broluer E3 R NI Photocell Receplacle'o 13WH Q SC Nor Salem {ocher" white' Clickllele for Utility option I'or additimta.l optu ns, gee IP66 spree., shoot rL IH©Ies „ nit I SIC a1) of ilre standard a2SnJ. 14. $1andar4 product leaw!es unites rd opt on ie s, {scnhed; door chips Elks Tyipc III rt &rm :II. .. l Ili Wrklipht CW IMP PFC."Mrg a 1,ghel output and a zbomerllle nor. included 3 Horizontal lemon moan 1. 3. Control by ethers 15. MI correct ono uelween door and Insure are Shipped unconneYed 4 11 engine pe Ilion of ell iu, n is not pain led end will renrce 9 Ple9¢e consult Iaclery for gvgildpill ly 1nom the racloly, door raleasa spring Included to open door natural alemosim regardless or Co1ar Selection 10. No I avadaGle ii HL opban when VH voltage IS Wtok4 ausbrtlali ally when the larches are released S Driver operates a1 4QmA Instead 01 the standard 525MA prvriding 11 r4'it available whorl U14 vol lage'I$ Selected 15 11ng9 retalnirg Yips not Included a5 pan of ons option a Iowan lumen' output aid a. longer [Ile 12. F�Iar to mu01 local spec sni at let rip re Inlonnatlon 17 $Iainl.0 sleet al rCabll table 6. Color ierrOernme per rivture. minimum 70 CRI 13. Sensor not included A PERFOR Initial Delivered In III Delivered In ltial Delivered Initial U C. a IJ D initial Delivered e D G R D B System Total Total Total Syrlem Total Total L „Mauro" It W Lumens Type III Lumens - Fype Ili Lumens-Type 111 Lurllens -Type 111 warts Current cur at Curren Opus Durant Current '42FIE LEDs Medium ern RactllDm Medium w'f Bacrllon Medium' #6gDeK Gnerel 4RUCK Medium de. d300K control I'4NIOX 320 -F77Y -# lsuy rim 2'30Y NPIiY gd'f=daOY "3t 347Y 21480V (77- F) Re[mg "' RaDnJ "` Ralln9 "' RaalnJ "` 1 Ir 40 .i,470 (0d) 1 1 1 2,76'4 (11 0 t I 3,0 .09 {0A) t 1 t 1 1 7.22i (n4; i•. 7 I 41 [t 40 0.77 0 20 h3 0 N, 0 1f, 163,.0f1 51) -0.248 {051 2!'1 2 3180 {1157 V 1 1 ?,,724 {VS) 2 2' 21 2 r r US} I I! 0.53 17 29 1)'£:i 71) V.2V tl] 19 141,1700 6V 5,098 {1)6) 2 2 3 SES f {lei 1 '7. 1 4,472 {06Y 2 2 `1 :3 350 fOcl 1162 V 54 U 20 01 [123 4.20 151,000 r - . AV 4.13 2'2 21 3A9 ?n�l� f 1_ 1 101 2 , �n 3.1�4II! I 11 59 0.32 0.29 76 I 0 ON 96.000 i 4 +J3 .. ii 130 VA2 0.36 101 U. 0.24 135,1101) 7' i•,� I 7 ? h +JT +:;� Iq .. .I�i I I It.' 1)!W DSII 1147 II 1 034 {3 TT 19000 4V 5,7(91) {114) 2 '1 21 4,215µ1o) 1 2 1 S.UUi) {i)4'I 2 2!2 3.75111:1)4.} 112 1 5 11133 0.44 U17 104 ! 0.30 0.24 65 O VU 5•'e. n:i. ? '' 7 5,725 iVSj 1 2 7 li.111 fil5y 7 7! ?' 4 3ILIS} 1 F 1 1'14 1 IW i) 55 U 4(e. 131 1 0'40 It 30 56,000 J ,. .n.. '• fl. 7ill fo131 1 3 7 l.83 &013) 9 2' 7 aiv11 it (116: 1 1 7 2 146 _ 1 23 0134 0 54 IlA 1) A4 0 al 50.000 1' -r t;' '.1; is rornalon •,n In I . ' E: V I I I tI.I I ' re' rianno !1 tlt rk r. :_.dd "an, a' u� e 2010 9elal-ED a division of Ruud Lighling • 1200 92nd Slreel • Slurtevanl, W153177 • 000 -236 -4906 • www- LEDwaySlreelii9hls -cam M.xcle in the 1)..S. /v. ur V_4. and im {narde6r {]arts- � Meets F1t1y American regganorTI wrfhirr 1ha AIM 5/18/2010 10 -4 -33 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P4 Notes: Page 2 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A Streefli Ty pe I I I Med Dale 01/15/09 General Description Finish Fixture hauling i3 all aluminum eowtiuction. Standard bxtuls utilizes lerminal block for Exclusive Colorlast ClsltaGuaid• finish features an E Coai epoxy primal evithan ullia power inlmt suilable for 22 --214 AWG wire and operates M b25mA Drive current is held durable silver pcwd or topcoat pram ding excellent resistance to corrosion, uttrayidel sxwlld ablc on 40, 54 and 60 a1) units (50 8 611 t I t) tends require two (Irivers} tixtilre rs degradation and abrasion Btowo, black, white and platinum bronze ponder topcoats Bra desigrmd to maunl an 1.25' IP 11.675' O.O.I and. +w 2' IP (2.375' O.D.) horizontal tenon and also available. The lnish is cowered by our 10 year laded warranty. i3 adiuslable r1 V to allow I& fixture levelling (includes leveling bubble to aid in this process). FI?'TUre Carriesa limited five year waimnrw Fixture and finish are otidurance tested tawitlastand 5,001) hnurs of elevafad ambient raft tog condtcons as debated in AS IM Standard l3 117 Electrical M adit Lv design accommodates varied lighting output tram hl gh power, white, 6000K Testing & Compliance (d- 500K per full tccture), minimum 70 CRI, long life LEE) sources. 120 -27TV 50160 It, 111 . listed in the U S and Canada for wet 10 Cali Otis. Consult factnrp for CF Corti hod Class 1 LED drivers are standard. 341 A80V 50!50 Ilk option is available. LED drivers leave producft Rol IS compliant Meatt GAL leans 611 Vibration Iaslmg and GI1- 63- 01RI power bactor >909L and THD 420 %At hill load IJ nits provided with integral Wit sit rge Sedlon 4.4N5,4.2 Earlllqudke [one 4. Intonational Dark -Sky Association avoros'od . supprestmn proloclian standard Olick dlsconnad harness suitable for mate and break u rider load pr avid ad on power Iced to driver roe case or maintenance. Surge protoctron Paireids tested in accar dance with IEEE C62.41.2 area ANSI stand aid 02.41.2 US. and international pataidt granted and pending BataLt❑ is a division of Ruud I ighhn;l. Inc. For a fisting or Ruud Lighting, Inc. patents, visit yr wespta.eov. F ield - Instal fed AccessiaTies XA SPtms for Light Engine ❑ gird Spikes HSG Housing %A -I i11l1PK6e E] %A- 11HH5NKf ISG Pliatotnetrius LEOway EPA & Weight Calculations rte_ -� ' i yr + -` - • --JSCN = � �`'- �. 157`fr I -50' ApprnT[ mate lY eight 12- 22711• z 12 z 4e- 60 LED fixture 16.0lba � �! EPA Horizontal Tenon Mount I firraite O.6B5 90 go 90' EPA Round Exuar at Mo l Squaw Inlareal Mains Harf¢ontal Tenons with Fixirrets) 6 PT.T iii Sunje 0.W PI /14)- I(W) 9' dwrn 1,189 \. PT-FFI 2R(180t 180' Twin 10 8ai +dleperre�irace: I1 .e Vanieel plan d;o Fvar - �- •` hanxomal art�e at malamlm ire ®epo'eer PT.rFfr -:g 10477 gfP Triply G !14 independent Testing LXOMCPeC wn.h07 I'St ieriri fdr, , Pa, il Stdmliff PUP[! 3H(12 12R Tliplu 1.590 ITL68266 0anditpowrr trace of 5400K, e0 LED Type III Medium Canelepuwsi trace of Type ill Medium LED Iumnaire wm1 plillap W) qu INwad 7170 SnealOghl lueiiea re Wei 4699 Initial ddiverad furnem backllghl ccntrol «AddSibs Io rar0 - :14 r- 1VVI eperaling nt 525mA All puhlidied lurrihaire pkelemerde test rip perfumed to IESKA LIA 79 -OS standards. P�iiiunulvtiiey:il Nlye m1 rnklirlJm �rAleeawer too' $D' $0' 40' 20' OF 20' 40' 6D' no' 100' - eJ' 244 60 183 i 40 122 20 — 61 0 k 0m CDh6 Lr4E 2D 61 • 314 113 132 11 J1) 11 122 185 244 40 122 PKLIMINAe'f go 180 Isele aleenith plot o16D0(NK, 60 LED Type Ill Madden elreelligel 375 244 183 122 61 Din 61 122 t88 244 305 tuminai re with backlgm coniml as 25' A.F.G. Lummai re with IspigoWodle plot of 6000K, 60 LED Type III Medium streel6¢M 5.1231niliat deow red lumens operating at 525mA. Initial FO at gnat 9iRriina4m at 2$' Ak.O. Wmdlnrre wIh 6,831 Iii Dal dHiwtrtd urnenr operating at 52W. Inillol F0 at gra4t. a 0 C) 2010 Beial-EV, a division of Ruud Lighting • 1200 92nd Street • Sl Uri evanl, WI 53177 • 600 -236 -6900 • www.LEOwayStreetIighls.cono s Made in fir4r U.S.!- uI U.S. and irn@d}tterlparfs- L�LJ Aft Cds Day A.rverxan foquiremenIS tvilhin the ARRA. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -34 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P5 Notes: Page 1 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A 1 f Type III Medium Da 01/15/99 BetaLEC Catalog #: STIR - LWY - 3MB - HT - 66 - C - UL - SK - 43K - 354 - SC Res t lgtl fnlnr Hw;eg r.[ar:e; Notes: [ 1 1. Mounted on a 3' -13` Mast AF in (b US Long I. ife) 1.Multi•WP11 rive r(Wired for 350mAinilia%e) 3- Black finish 4.4300K Color Ternp [ [Y ms I S. Door Safety Tether 6- With Backlight COntrOl Produtt Fanllbj Oplic Mounling #of LEDs LEO Yofl<a Color FWoin IDSlathM Options (KID) Series OPIILnff Inns In ininnally on Ina Imes pr a b o v e STfl LWY 13 3M' HTa 13 G pUL El Sir 13350 &,DmA Drive Currerdl p 3MW 1305 lfnwergal Si[j& ®439 4100K G olor Tony perahlre A05 120 - 2T7J p 0K E3 700 TOUmA Qnvo Gurreld' 10UH Black' E3 DIM 0--10Y Dimming! ° Universal 13 R E3 F Fusers 147 Ilrnllzr' ® HL FYA..ow (1175)35025. dual carrml input) s IE3 1`6 E3 N No Ouick. Dlsconnmct I larnpes or Lovelorn Bubble" Maintain 13 PD Power Door"" Broluee E3 R WIM Photocell Receplaelalo 13WH F3 SC Nor Salem felher" white' Clickllvle for Utility option for additiowl options, gee IP66 spree.. shoot Footnotes 1 Ik ly , , I :•' .I.I nA ms lC as of It,, unclad a2SnJ. 14. $laadard product leaw!es idles*. N opt on ie s, {sclhed; door ClGps 2 It$NA Typ III f7 dim :II. .. ui It Wrktighl Con trop Pfc.".rpa'll]nelwnlen outputandashonerllle not. included 3 Horizontal tenon moam 1. 3. Control by others 15. All cMnecllons m1weei door and Insure are shipped unconnecled 4 Llghl engine po rhon of exl ru> n Is not pain led and will renice 9 PIe93e pnnsull 15r1ISfy' ter 8meilupillly from the factors. door adle%* spring Included to open door nMOW alonvirrm regardlie 4e. Co1Cr $aleCIMn 10. Plat vadaGle wtH HL Option when VH voltage is Wtcle4 autorrlalirally aden she 131ch.s are r2leased S paver operate; a1 40ma Irsresd 01 the 3landa rd 525MA pronding 11 Plot available what UH ml last is Selected 15 Hinge retaining clips not Ineludsd w pan of Irls option a lo'Ner IumeJr output aid a. longer [Ile 32. FRIer to mu1111esel spec Sheat let mare Inlona wn 17 $Iainl u Steel al rcioll Cable 6. Color terrpersium per rislure. minimum 70 CRI 13. Senor not indvded A PERFOR Initial Delivered In ltial Delivered In ltial Delivered n U C. a 1J G inillal Delivered B D G B U G System Total Total Total Syrlum Total Total L „Heura" d W Lumens Type Ill Lumens - Fype Ili Lumens - Type 111 Lumens -Type 111 Watts Currom Cur at Current VAI parent Current 42VC LEDs Medium erJ nackllDm Medium w'f iniall9h[ Medium' #6DDOK Goal RUCK Medium de. d3gOK Control I4NI?K i20 -F77Y -# lsur 4130V 0PIiY g4'f- aeoY "3t 347r 21480V (77- F) Ra[mg "' Pl a ti ng - 1ralmg "` 1 1, 49 3,470(04) 1 1 1 ?.75'4(94) 0 t 1 3,949 {0A) t 111 7.22i (0413 i•. 7 1 41 (1 40 9.77 020 h3 01t, 01f, 163,.0f1 ,k) -0.248 {051 2 !'t 2 3 180 {057 V 1 1 ?,,724 {051 2 2' 2 1 2 r 1 US} I I;-0 V.53 17 29 U'£:i 7U 0.2V V 19 141,17V0 60 5,098 (0 G) 2 2 2 1,823 W43 1 2 1 4,472 {06Y 2 2 `2 j :3 354 f Oe'l 1 11 F2 V 54 D 2U 01 [1.21 0.29 111,O0U r - . Firma 4V 4.13' MIN 2'2 21 349 ?n�l� f 9 .0110 "101, 2 , �n 3�.114r11.1�, I II s9 V.32 0.29 76 I 0 -22 229 96.040 i 4 +J3 .. ii 1;11 VA2 0.36 lUl U. 0.24 05,000 7'11 7' i.�� I 7 ? h +JT +:;� Iq ... �i I I II.• 0!A 9S(I 1147 Ito 1 93-0 {3 2Y 1911911 4V 5,7(39 {[I-0) 2 'L 21 4,215 µt4) 1 2 1 S.00i) {i14'I 2 2!2 3.75111:174.} 1 2 1 yg tl 133 0A-0 U37 104 ! 0.30 0.24 65 5•'I n:i. ? '' 7 5,275iV5j 1 2 2 li.111 7 7! ?' 4 3ILIS} 1 7 1 1'14 1lW 1755 U 131 1 tl'ffi 1) ISO 56.000 J .. .n.. '• G.71(I f9131 1 3 7 7$3 &06) 7 T7 aivll 11(116. 117 2 14n _ 123 964 054 IlA 1) A4 0'A 50.000 .,r =a l r d.,';, al 1 -r t;' '.1; is rornalon •,n In I . 1E: V I I I tI.I I 'lary rlalln7 ,i, t r ilrL n1, 7 ° !1 tll rH r. _.dd "an, d' u� e 2010 9elal-ED a division of Ruud Lighling • 1200 92nd Slreel • Slurteranl, W153177 • 000 -236 -4906 • www- LEDwaySlreelii0his -cam M.xrle iu the U..S. /e. ur V_4. and im {narde6r {]offs- � Meels Ffuy American reepuiremcnds wrlhirf 1ha ArM 5/18/2010 10 -4 -35 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P5 Notes: Page 2 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A 1 1 1' III Medium Dale 0 t' General Descriplion Finish Fixture housing is all aluminum cmrslroctiml. Standard fixture ubli[es terminal block far Exclusive Colorfast LlellaGuard'n finish features an E Coal epoxy primer erithan ul €ia poorer input suitable for #2 #14 AWG wire and operates at 525mA Drive current is held durable silver powder topcoat, providing excellent resistant to corrosion, ulrrawirdet swdchatde on 40, 50 and 60 LID unds (50 S 611 1 E:D ends require two drivers) lixrurr rs degradation and abrasuon Nron7e, black, white and platinum brmne powder topcoats are designed to ruounl on 1.25' IP (1 -675' O.D.) and!m 2' IP (2.375' IJ.D,) horuordal tenon and also available. The hnlsh is covered by our 113 year lirnded warranty. is adiustable d SP to allow la fixture loading (includes leveling bubble to aid in this III ofesSj FlxrlJre canna& a limited five year warranly Fixture and finish are andurance tested towithstand 5,41110 hours of elowalid amhiont salt tog cendrhons as defined In AS IM Standard 6 117 Electrical Modular design accopurr ¢s vaned lighting output from high powar, white, 6000K Testing & Compliance (.!- 500K per lull taturo), minimum 70 CKI, long life LED sources. 1213-2778 513100 Fh, Lfl listed in the ll S and Canada for wet locations Consult factory for CF Certified Class 1 LED drivers are 5tandard. 341 480V bOM h12 option is aratlable. LED drivers have products DolIS compliant Moats OAI Iran$ 611 Vibration feshng and GK- 69 -GOKI power factor �g031, and THD t20% at full load. Units provided with integral 9k'1 surge Section 4.415, 4.2 Earthquake, Zone 4- International Dark -Sky Association approved. sltpprmswen prol¢clion standard Wick djukuwaad harness sellable for mate and break u ndor load provided on power load to driver for easo of marrdonancc Surge prolectron Patents tested in accordance with IEEE C62.41 -2 and ANSI standard 02.41.2 [IS. and international patents granted and pending Wail I'D is a dwision of hued I Ightmy. Inc. Fan a hsting of Ruud Lighlmg, klc. patents, vi sit wrww. usplo. gov. F told-] Intel led Accessories F-1 Bird Spares for Light Engne ❑ Sid Spikes 15t far Ffuusing Q Bird S ltk4PK613 ❑ %A -Ilfi 10SPKf ISG Photomellies LEDway" EPA A Weigtd Calculations 150 50 150 5I' Approximate Welighi120 -277V' 40- 66 LED Fixture, 16..0lb6. 3 �t2 2 EPA Horizontal Yukon Mount _ 1 fixture 0.68$ EPA �. hound External Mauit i Square Internal liou l / H urizurdal Tenons with Fiaiue(s) 6 6 - PWI) 114 Single 0.906 � PIIPU- ZIf {90t yrr lw±rn 1.1g9 CeMlepdua Ttade: Vedca Aamthrou¢I Cand6eposreiTars Vertical plane nroegh PTiM AH {1811] 1817 Twin 1590 hvnzontal male of nalansum ra'Idie0omr 3 Wriloraal Ogle of maxmran PTIPD- 811{901 90P Triple 1.774 Iadopalldmi Tooting Lab- ratDmao com@ed It$t. Fitpon No. PRELIMINARY PTIPD -"1213) 120 Triple 1.590 1 T10266 Carvitpowtr trace of "OOK., 40 LED Type I0 Mtdlum Cemilepuwer line e1 T9pe. 111 Medium LE 0 1 oniftle ulh pTIPD - "90) 91 Orlad 2178 trreellrphI n minute aim 4,696 inilisl delivered lumens backlighl c"trel 'Add $ 15 Dr rkaRS Drrtiur ii! 337-4 n%tufe5 eperaungw575mA All petit pled ]umieifre pkelmletde tssnnp pedamed to ONA LM - 79 -0S standees. Dili -n Dl venue pone D1 fr&lanndm prYJledg%2n 100' 60' 60' 4a ^rl ' P' 20 40, SO. IW e1' 244 .. 617 133 a. de 122 2 d t 20 culls Uc 1110119 t.rs- zm s 1 z0 24.4 189 I-- .. .l. �. 122 --• 4e " 122 PRELIMINARf 64 is Isolaoloana4e 0 -1- 1 6009. fin LEC Type lit Nkdlrn srteelligkl 375704 183122 61 410 e1 122 183244 301 Iumins m wllh bukbphl Cgnlml a32'5'A.f.G. Leminalrewnh Isvlovrcan6le plat of 6000 K, 60 LEI) Type III Medium streell:gAl S,iL miller dellve red lumens cpealing at 525mA. India FCal ni 2$'9..4.13 Luminarrc x11M1 6.8$1 IM1llld dtilwtRd d . n. .raung at 625mA. IM1I11af f G a0 prdeL. _�. @ 2010 BelaLEn'§, a division of Ruud Lighting + 1260 92nd Street • Sturtevant, WI 53131 • 966- 236 -6900 + www- LEDwayStreetlighis.eom z I ` Marie in [ire U.S.A. uF U -S. and imported Paris- LE EI !F= Meets Bony American re13uiiemenis wiihirl the ARRA. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -36 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P2, P3, P4, P5 Pole and Mast Arm Notes: Refer to P2, P3, P4, and P5 technical specs for length of Page 1 of 1 mast arm Supplier: U.S. LongLife Contact: Jack Mason, cu fl ers @aol.com; 1- 888 - 295 -2677 I �,- CAST ALUMINUM D €CORATIVE ACORN FINIAL TENON MOUNT 2"SCO. 40 STEEL PIPE (O.D. 2 W) -�..�_l_�- I` SECL9RE0 VIA (0) SIS SET SCREWS G r I - W SHOWN OR 2r I i r I 5'0 X .120 STEEL SHAFT 189 1W 011 1/F • 419 1W BASE PLATE " - W4' BOLT m'r1r• rvrP. 2 M CLAM SHELL CAST IRON BASE i (I � 1 - ACCESSDDOR •'- ACCEWHCIE MOUNTI DETAIL MOUNTING SLOr II II roR 39'0 ANCROR BOLT WIHH NOMI NAL RANGE 7 10 THRU 11 110 O AMETEP 60LT CIRCLE (4 EQ. SPACED) 1Y + 34'TH. STEEL BASE PLATE (OUSSETED) GROLINDUNE - L IWO X 1PLX TLEG GALVANIZEC STEEL ANCH M BOLT L (4 REQUIRED) Lon life Inc. PR 'F T Town of Vail Colorado 2021 Bridgetown Pilo, U .S ■ Fea9sterville, PA ISM PART# USLCS0099- 237FINIAUARM•24 "TO 36" N.T.S. " T.B.O. ° ""7715170 "' 7a7 7 5/18/2010 10 -4 -37 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type P2, P3, P4, P5 Multi -tap Driver Notes: Page 1 of 2 Supplier: N/A Contact: N/A I W 3-Output LED 1 river — CE366XO1 'I Technical Specifications dimensions :..................................... ...........................9.5" x 2.3" x 1.6" Wei, ght :........................................................ ............................... 2.0 lbs. Mounting: ..._....._ ................... 2tabs on each end ..... ............................... Case Material : ...................................... .......................................... Steel r Packaging: .............................................................. Silicone potted unit Input Voltage :......... ............................... .......................120 -277V -10 °I° I nput Frequency: .............................................................. 50160Ha +5 °I° Input Current :.. ...........................1.9A max. at 120V, 0. 9Amax. at 230V Active Power Factor Correction Operating Temperature: .................................................... 40 °C H +80 °C Isolated Output Rated Lifetime .......... ...... .............................................. Hours RoHS................................................................ ............................... Yes Output Power Output Output Current Max- THE Power Factor Ffliciency at Line Lead Voltage at 120Vdc Regulation Regulation (Vdc) °1 ° � Output 21pVdc0utput ( °f°} ( °l °y 147 0.700 110 105 - 210 0.525 15 >_ 0.92 0.9 ± 2 ± 2 74 0.350 WIRING INPUT OUTPUT Black Line Red Positive White Neutral Orange Negative 350mA Yellow Negative 525mA Blue Negative 700mA Protection Input High Voltage Surge ......................................................................... Yes InputOverload ....................._........ ............................... ............._..............Yes Output Short Circuit ................. I.................. Self - limited with Auto Recovery Output No -load .. ............................... ........................Output Voltage Limited Overheat.... ............................. Output Power is reduced with Auto Recovery C C LED" cus ■a.irleiwennxn E333031 02010 BetaLED -800- 236 -6800 - www.betaLED.com 5/18/2010 10 -4 -38 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Notes: This represents the wiring diagram for the multi -tap Type P2, P3, P4, P5 Multi -tap Driver ballast. Connect Red lead for 350mA, Orange lead for 525mA, Page 2of2 and Blue lead for 700mA. Cap all unused leads. Supplier: N/A Contact: N/A W I R I N G D I A G R A M S VOLTAGE(S) OPTION(S) i DRIVER LED'S DETAILS DOCUMENT REV DATE 525mA Drive Current IN LrI:H U LED 50 -60 32V 10 LED, 64V 20 LED WIMF- LSL -WD -23 Electronic Series Boards WIRING A Notes: 1.) Terminal block and lead wires may be used. 2. Lever nuts may be used refer to BOM. m M Yellow 525 8 M I --I = Black m 0 a - ote: NOT used on 50 LED units � L1 G N � t Black ® Ground White 5/18/2010 10 -4 -39 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Type BA1 Notes: Reference for future installation of banner arm poles by Page 1 of 1 TOV. No BA1 pole locations shown. Supplier: U.S. Long Life Contact: Jack Mason, cupflyers @aol.com 1- 888 - 295 -2677 2t CABT ALUMIN UM DECO 1 ACORN RNIAL ll SECL1REt3 VUY (3) 114 20 918 SET SCREWS I - STEEL C(wPLIMG ALUM NUM HEXAGON BREAK AWAY BANNER ARM P ALUMI NUM P IPE REMOVABLE END CAP INTEGRAL SAFETY CABLE y ' I ' I T,®.D. BANNER BANNER I 14 - I i' S„ ire - - .973 114' BASE PLATE — ;W —Sw BOLT � rY r NT Irr TYP. 4 ~. I �I .189 &TEFL SHAFT 45M - P HUL U31 GSM MOUNTING DETAIL MOUNTING SLOT - 15 1WO X 5'R CA37 ALLIM. FOR 314'9 ANCHOR BOLT 2 PC. SASE CCJVER WITH NOM NAL RANGE _ — STEEL BASE PLATE {gad} 7 1T2' THRU 11 V? OIAhEiER 9 . HCLT CIRCLE I4 Eq. SPACM n GROUND LINE I I - 3A'O X 17 %X MEG GALVANIZED M EL ANCHOR BOLT I (4 REQUIRED) L o n life Inc, PR JE T11 9 Town of Vail Colorado 2021 Bridgetown Pike, ■ ■ PART4F UUSLC314 'IFCHIALl BREAK-WAY BANNER " Feastelville, PA 49053 N.T.S. " T.BD_ "" 1115714 ' 7 ai 1 Type BL1 Notes: 5/18/2010 10 -4 -40 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Page 1 of 2 Supplier: ANY Contact: N/A VER. BY DATE DESCRIPTION 11A DIA (3) LOOSEN THREE HEXAGON SCREWS TO RE -LAMP FLARED LOUVER REFLECTOR SHADES FABRICATED OF HEAVY GAUGE CAST IRON. INNER SURFACES COVERED BY A CLEAR 10 . 5 ' POLYCARBONATE ENCLOSURE WITH WHITE REFLECTIVE SURFACES AND WATERTIGHT SEALS LAMP: 1135W /BF515IHPSi (S76) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM (BY OTHERS) MEDIUM BASE PULSE RATED SOCKET (3) HEAVY GAUGE STAINLESS STEEL CONNECTING STRUTS 45.0' CORES COIL BALLAST FOR 120V OPERATION ANSI CODE 876 8" DIA. COR -TEN STEEL POLE 12" DIA. CORTEN STEEL BASE PLATE SECURED WITH FOUR 1/2" DIA. X 15" HOT DIP GALVANIZED STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS FOR EMBEDDING IN 1ZO' CONCRETE FOUNDATION AT 90° SPACING ON DIA 10" DIA. BOLT CIRCLE (CONTACT FACTORY FOR FULL SIZE BOLT LOCATION TEMPLATE) NOTE: COR -TEN STEEL CONTAINS COPPER AND CARBON STEEL. AFTER WEATHERING, A THIN, UNIFORM LAYER OF RUST APPEARS AND ACTS TO SELF - PROTECT THE SURFACE FROM FURTHER CORROSION THUS ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE. THE PROCESS OF OXIDATION CAUSES THE SURFACE TO BLEED. CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO INSTALL THE BYSTED FIXTURE IN A DRAINAGE PIT OR IN GRASS TO PREVENT SLI RFACF STAIN INC. WFASHFRING• HOUSING2T03 YEARS, AND POST 1 TO 2 YEARS. TARGETTI JDs NAME TOWN OF VAIL POULSEN US4sc 71TLE BYS11135WlHPSIED -17 medEum1120V1COR -TEN w®. BYS111100WIMHIED -17 mediuRV " oen�°z. "Pou: 1207MICOR -TEN 5802001395 NOTES: INCHES DRAWN BY: DATE APPROVED BY: TYPE 1. FINISH:COR -TEN THU 11 _09_08 2. VOLTAGE: 120V ., MATERIAL VERSON: u�w AS NOTED 00 SCALE: SHEET: DYM.NO.: NTS 1 OF 1 131- 12581 -ODO 5/18/2010 10 -4 -41 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 8: Appendix c A. Life Cycle Cost Analysis for five lamp sources studied follows on page 44, and is based on a sample layout for each luminaire /lamp source, from the Village roundabout to the Village parking garage. Target average illuminance and uniformity ratios are based on IESNA RP -8 -00, adjusted for rural conditions in Town of Vail. 1 . Although the anticipated lamp life for the LED 35OmA source would indicate 0 lamp burnouts annually, we have included a single lamp burnout as a "worst case" factor. Real life conditions are likely to result in improved maintenance costs for the LED 35OmA source resulting from fewer lamp burnouts. B. Life Cycle Cost Analysis for total LED 35OmA roadway lighting system follows on page 45. This is an anaylsis of the legitimate roadway lighting system only, and does not include decorative lighting systems including the Village standard pedestrian lantern, the bike pathway bollard, and the non - illuminated banner arm pole. 1 . Although the anticipated lamp life for the LED 35OmA source would indicate 0 lamp burnouts annually, we have included a single lamp burnout every 4 years (.25 avg burnout annually) as a "worst case" factor. Real life conditions are likely to result in improved maintenance costs for the LED 35OmA source resulting from fewer lamp burnouts. C. Details 1 . Figure 8.1 illustrates pole setback relative to roadway edge. This is an approximate setback and must be verified with actual field conditions including underground utility placement 2. Figure 8.2 illustrates suggestion for placement of landscape material, particularly trees with mature height of crown at 20' -0" or less. 2 --LANE ROADWAY SHOWN, TYPICAL POLE PLACEMENT FOR 4 —LANE AND 5 —LANE ROADWAY. 6' -0" V -0` SHOULDER/ 12' -0 LANE 12' -0" LANE SHOULDER/ BIKE BIKE u u u u CENTERLINE OF POLE AT 18" FROM EDGE Of SHOULDER, CURB, BIKE LANE, OR WALK. POLE PLACEMENT RELATIVE TO ROADWAY NO SCALE Figure 8.1 5/18/2010 10 -4 -42 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan MINIMUM MINIMUM 40' -0" 40' -0" FROM POLES FROM POLES m L BEGINNING OF TURN /DECEL /ACCEL LANE POLE PLACEMENT RELATIVE TO ROADWAY NO SME le' —"" "ETAN auo 111 FN LANE 55 DEGREE ANGLE OF 55 DEGREE ANGLE OF TYPE 3 BEAM TYPE 3 BEAM leelll TWIN LANE I4' —e' LNE IY —C LAZE gNpIA➢Ep/ 16_0" YY CROWN OF MATURE TREES SHOULD BE MINIMUM 10' -0" ABOVE ROADWAY GRADE TO MINIMIZE OBSTRUCTIONS OF ROADWAY LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION TREE PLACEMENT RELATIVE TO LIGHT POLES NO 9CILE Figure 8.2 5/18/2010 10 -4 -43 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan 6W LED df1.n742.S*A IWW W.S-25'pdv 1001 'MR 25'" 1p% -26yw 3LE&Q35Dfuh LtuWtYnfnlonlai4a LEG 053M1 MT, L11 I1+1uAA LED 12 357aK IAn/apl w B"54 rn4 uS AMWOCIR" USArrAoud t1S LiptAnp ToM 9110.E nA mom 0 LEDx*f 100 GhIM CO FIRS 4 id" 400 NH 3131r LEG T5 LEDwaf 'Et2 Nunir+rnf Lum m 22 25 25 V Lemp�LUmrswal I l 1 1 I Sydrmwafttumam 440 139 125 110 76 Lumnaru kvKkt3r144mm) SQ4700 #1,!16'11 S S, 114 O7 563600 sm 03 Irwidtlim mmYAullwmrc 3.3 '33 3.3 35 33 H L"Ire1;"mCaq $15000 $15000 $15004 Moo $15003 Irdwalm tu3stuR.rzaw 543546 7$+19266 woo MOD $49606 CWnngriougf,urmaln 33 35 33 33 13 HWrVL" -.'W nrr10* $15000 S1000 $15006 SI^,06G Sti0D7 Clsar"C 4l-- -Immm mm moo 14% ca WIV woo LImR InPorn" Lmtw M&ed*m nr Kiwi GE Phil" M. Lump Mcdd 0 LE0437D1 Wpll+LlCdarELk 5 Cxanel:'*4 St rl kk[fun.I.Kkw LEG Llnv wit" 90 100 IC9 Ito 60 4a11p LAP 7 ,4100 40436 24.604 1t0.L170 131.006 lntral Lumwn m 9jx* &mo 44+2 Limp u mfl Dopacldwn 0915 496 b 73 995 695 Doha" ~ 097 450 094 1150 093 OR W Fidor ICU IOU 1 09 too 147 Im r4abb•l" Focl*r 1 40 147 1 M 1 1 r0 EQ1IP1ogt4Fwor boo I IOD Ico 100 fom LWm Low Fww 094 47. 1181 1077 821 fAgawwd Lvrwa 8.x1"3 6. 74 0475 69;'!3 4214 CtsdAillP &W 00 $75.07 $W CRT $81000 $9400 A"LWWFWra'law 33 3-3 33 33 33 "LIRWHe%mpi OW $I5D00 S15D66 $15300 SWOD $L5000 N gb'1v u w0wA4mp #"or) 5x9547 6458504 666017 moo BIB IMtiI.diI11 BOW T%* Nona CWA SCWA Nw* +4w r3eNSt1'I$111 D 38 49 4 4 1311th - fe PR I%606 60.006 96.000 10p0GD 159.607 ®t+4d rww fu Ir,17 1 p) NA NA Purge FBdcr ROD D90 085 1 OD 100 @e41rAomUffirme $17566 $1 2006 $Imou $0 OD $87500 f440t41ae1LaGarlil4rsliume w 33 33 33 313 33 Holtdy LB[+StPogE6lE�iy Ggll 315D.66 $15066 $15007 MOD $15000 AftelwCow um *t 1405.00 S"00 S+f33OO t"m S1WID Eirfpdf Ganw+pd411t Aq Wooddey C�95at M)'QA1Car 12 F2 112 12 12 Arp38Rd@41i43fpg1*4ffgh2= 42 t2 k^ 12 t2 it Sra7nf ?yer,krlptkxfR 12 R2 Q 12 12 k vAAW70&"Vl?LUT 4390 4m 4391 4,336 4,390 Tara'd,'p"Lo4mm.. 3 4 4 3 2 frmwCfrlipC+M&#uW 004 604 004 004 004 Ecwwsit A1w41dk L{1ly v FoA 11m1Cpff $;7.434 m e75 V7, $14,445 620.6b7 LIp1Yh jmfaith c&t 5 USO SIZ375 $12,375 $13;3% W.m WkiVWAC W $AIVA 8306 $ SUM 635060 #3 Iltrvpaw U240 $11,507 $11.62$ '$,914 $56147 Smltli>OxMioumSd C&ff.0VA $3,£61] 65006 33,000 $1,000 $3.016 Ctsf U.240 811.500 $11 - Q$9 63,910 SS." f4WfrNfalUd Mfu 164556 W $41.602 ✓ti IRaFIwwlceC' is f.unp &rirtiria'Id4r I I 2 1 I AmRW'RNAnrArq .G4f 6597 WO V 6625 3eLfittxm'iaiR 000 0•.07 0170 600 600 4k'nuffR'+�Galsore.6 rf 1 1 1 SR $1 66 rmrr'' 4tnr4d7af# Ste§ m $01 S41Z to 7ud.ImreMlS4arararseCArf 39.m $I,io 52 11.091 11,N4 TIdat Lis egdacoa Lrs+h411M�CSF' Sf�l+a.vm ?4 19 ^4 Lla�.r -JO $''!s7fCasP 5'JB.�46 :VS.� frAwc,[af =tat 56+1.Y6 5f.2.-M $41,0 + )VOIL3Ag Cori $147. '614519'1+ .. �61R3.687 Afflurk krxWCed 15.6£3 659x3. 14547 God Ribm LIsC3d+ #nsTfCcsr b7% 21 13% 'keg Gy4�14fYNMfo pg Ac�1r 4Q'ti 361 64 JiS '5416 re"C'' fd 40% 43%31% :;S'!L. 37% tg cfd&cp f Im lot Iw% 100% 811±5+261.0 TC1� i saurtr, 3 >�p 2 10 -4 -44 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan 3 LED 0 350 mA driver Luminaire Informatlon LED a350MA Idbnulaclurer Beta 325MA Wdel0 LEDway 102 Number of Luminaires 187 LampslLuminaire 1 stem WattslLuminaire 7S Luminaire Cost including lamps) $940.W Installation HuusdLuminaire 33 Hourly Lab or Installation Cost $150,00 Installation Cost/Luminare $495.00 Cleaning Hourskuminaire 3.3 Houlry Labor Cleaning Cost $150,00 Cleaning Cost /Lumina rye $495.00 Lamp Information Lamp Manufacturer Beta Lamp Model # LED Lamp Watts 60 Lamp Life 131,000 Initial Lumens 4,472 Lamp Lumen Depreciation 0.95 Dirt Depreciation 0.90 Ballast Factor 100 Tie mpeAure Factor 1 10 Equipment Factor 1.00 Teal Light Loss Factor 0.94 W1nlained Lumens 4,204 CostlLarnp $94.00 Relamp labor Hours/Lamp 3.3 Hourly Lab or Relamping Cost $154.00 Relamp Labor Cosftarrrp $495.00 Ballast Information Ballast Type None Ballast Watts 0 Ballast Lire, hrs 150,000 Ballast Factor NA Power Factor i.00 Ballast CostlLuminaire $175.00 Reballasi Labor HoursIu minaire 3.3 Hourly Labor Reballasting Cost $150.00 Reballasl CostlLu min aire $153.00 5/1 8/2010 10 -4 -45 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan Energy Consumption: Avg Weekday Operating HourslD ay 12 Avg Satufday Operating Hours 12 Avg Sunday Operaft Hours 12 Annual Operating Hours 4,380 TotalLighting Load, KYA 14 Energy Unit Cost, $X VVH 0.04 Economic Analysis Initial Costs: LigttingEquiomert Cost $175,780 Lighfinqinstablibn Cost $92,565 Wiring Unit Cost, VKVA $3,000 wift Cost $42,5536 SerV iCeDktribWon Unit CW?, $/K VA $3,000 So n4wD istribdion Cost $42,636 Total ln#iai Cost W,617 Annual Energy Costa $2,490 Annual Nbintenance Costs: Lamp Bunxxtsff ear 0.25 A rmal R elamping Cost $147 BaLastFafiureslYear 0.00 Annual Robaffasfing Cost $0 Annual Clearing Cost $495 Total Annual Maintenance Cost $642 Total Life Cycle Cost: UseAilLife of LighingSystem, yrs 25 inflation Factor 3% Life Cycle Energy Cost $1310,3:5 Life Cycle maintowre C osts $33,619 Initial cost $3,61' Tolai Life Cycle Cost $517,571 A mrked Annual Cost $20,703 Ratios Life Cycle Energy Cast 25% 016 Cycle Maintenance C osts 6% InNai cost 68% Total L)fe Cycle Cost 100% 5/18/2010 10-4-46 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 9: Appendix D A. Photographs of Comparative Sites in Vail and metered footcandle measurements. 1. City Market FEbfu2fy 9, 2010 s' 2. Safeway Parking February 9, 2010 s•, 5/18/2010 10 -4 -47 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan 4. West Vail Roundabout February 4, 2018 mi le 3.2 fC 2.4 fC I Off Ramp — West Vail Roundabout February % 2818 ■ ■ pole is out 3.4 fc 5/18/2010 10 -4 -48 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan S. Matterhorn Dr. and Frontage Rd. fn „roar•; 9, 2f1D ar L 5. Donovan Park Lot February 9, 2010 15.2 fc 5/18/2010 10 -4 -49 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan 7. Village Turnabout — Pedestrian Crosswalk February% 2030 `�- 5.4 fc 8. Village Roundabout February 9, 2010 1A 5/1 4/2010 10 -4 -50 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan 9. Village Roundabout 1 -70 Off Ramp Febru,�ry9, 2 @14 10. Ford Park Test Site February % 2010 1.4 f c at 20 from po .25 fc at edge of beam p attern 5/1 8/2010 10 -4 -51 Front •... Lighting Master Plan 52 F ord P ark Test Site February 9, 2010 t 1,1 �c at opposite side 1,�6 ft at 2U' from pale of dri�re .- .�� ft at edge of beam pattern Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan PART 10: Roadway Photometric Plans A. Application Notes 1 . Photometric plans are a point by point study of illuminance (light incident on the horizontal roadway surface). Study is limited to the roadway and adjacent shoulders and bike paths. 2. Backgrounds for the roadway have been provided by Town of Vail Public Works and incorporate future roadway configuration based on the Master Transportation Plan. 3. Calculation programs used in the photometric study are AG132, V1 .9, and Visual V2.6 Professional Edition. 4. IES files for calculation tools are the most current available in the industry, provided by product manufacturers. B. Lighting Photometric Plans included are: • PP -1 West Vail Part 1 • PP -2 West Vail Part 2 • PP -3 West Vail Part 3 • PP -4 Timber Ridge Part 1 • PP -5 Timber Ridge Part 2 • PP -6 Lionshead Part 1 • PP -7 Lionshead Part 2 • PP -8 Lionshead Part 3 • PP -9 Vail Village Part 1 • PP -10 Vail Village Part 2 • PP -11 Vail Village Part 3 • PP -1 2 Vail Village Part 4 C. Statistical Zones are identified on the photometric plans as "N -zone #" for North Frontage Road zones and "S- zone #" for South Frontage Road zones. Average footcandle (fc) and average /min footcandle (uniformity ration) represent the calculated values as compared to the target design values identified in Part 3 for medium, low, and intermitten intersection lighting zones. The high zones (proposed roundabouts at Simba Run) target the existing roundabout light levels. D. The proposed re- alignment of the South Frontage Road at EverVail (east of the proposed Simba Run underpass) is shown as statistical zone 7 -alt. The existing roadway configuration is shown as statistical zone 7. 5/18/2010 10 -4 -53 Frontage Road Lighting Master Plan North Frontage Road Statistical Zones: STATISTICS Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max(Min Avg /Min N -zone 1 mid 0.6 fc 1.4 fc 0.1 fc 14.01 6.0:1 N - zone 2 inter 0.4 fc 1.7 fc 0.1 fc 17.01 4.0:1 N -zone 3 inter 0.6 fc 1.8 fc 0.1 fe 18.0:1 6.0:1 N - zone 6 inter 0.6 fc 1.8 fc 0.1 fc 18.0:1 6.0:1 N - zone 7 med 0.7 fc 2.7 fc 0.2 fc 13.5:1 351 N - zone 8 high 2.2 fc 9.0 fc 0.6 fc 15,0:1 3.7:1 N - zone 9 med - 0.9 fc 5.0 fc 0.2 fc 25.01 4.5:1 N - zone 10 inter 0.6 fc 1.8 fc 0.2 fc 9.0:1 3.0:1 N - zone 11 inter + 0.6 fe 1.8 fc 0.2 fe 9.0:1 3.0:1 N - zone 12 inter + 0.7 fe 1.8 fc 0.2 fc 9.0:1 3.5:1 South Frontage Road Statistsical Zones: STATISTICS Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min AvgfMin S - zone 1 med + 0.6 fc 1.8 fc 0.1 fc 18.01 6.01 S - zone 2 inter + 0.7 fc 1.8 fc 0.3 fc 6.0 2.31 S - zone 3 inter 1 0.7 fc 1.7 fe 0.3 fe 5.7.1 2.3.1 S - zone 4 inter + 0.4 fc 1.7 fc 0.1 fc 17.01 4.0:1 S - zone 5 med 0.7 fc 3.6 fc 0.2 fc 18.0:1 3.5:1 S - zone 6 high 1.9 fc 6.3 fc 0.4 fc 15.8:1 4.8:1 S - zone 7 low + 0.5 fc 1.8 fc 0.1 fc 18.01 5.01 S - zone 7ALT med 1 0.8 fc 5.5 fe 0.0 fe NIA N 1 A S - zone 8 med + 0.8 fc 3.1 fc 0.2 fc 15.5:1 4.0:1 S - zone 9 high + 1.3 fc 4.9 fc 0.2 fc 24.51 6.51 S -zone 10 med i 07 fe 1.5 fe 0.2 fe 7.51 3.51 S - zone 11 inter + 0.9 fc 4.1 fc 0.2 fc 20.51 4.51 S - zone 12 med 0.8 fc 4.8 fc 0.2 fc 24.0:1 4.0:1 S - zone 13 law 0.6 fc 4.6 fc 0.1 fc 46.0:1 6.0:1 5 - zone 14 med + 0.9 fc 8.7 fc 0.2 fc 43.51 4.51 S - zone 15 low 0.5 fc 1.8 fc 0.1 fc 18.01 5.0:1 S - zone 16 inter I- 0.7 fc 5/18/20101.8 fc 0.2 fc 9.0:1 3.5:1 10 -4 -54 mil ill. ❑ \ Vll Q p o — -----------' —_ -�, °PZ 1-0 P3 o l t_ ,EO -o ❑ P z ALI I J 8 C[ IT 1E o ❑ �® REVOSOGNS o.FaF �,F,L_oF ,p➢ WEST VAIL - PART 1 ..m° _ ..a�. o�w.=�.a=uw�o. SCALE IN FEET LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: I\ SHIEST N. L� °� w J , pll ill. 0 so 90 ( E 0 0 B LLA - 0' Eii El p _ E LL 9 p BLi a u' -o. - U lo l o C F El REVOGNS So 200 2 N a WEST VAIL — PART 2 iu a••L °' -° SCALE IN FEET a.,.,N NOTES: �o�< ryLL MO,r HI LIGHTING PLA �. _ arm � Ro — �. °��w.�.�wW�� � I V DATE SHEET \� � ❑ E;FF {fig i a � 3 v_ ❑ � L 2 x \ \ J x F _ Q a oz REVOGNS WEST VAIL - PART S SCALE IN FEET MI ° LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: IV Nr� »° DATE p —. —_ ,mw N. L PLAC L IC 0 F'DR1 , EL 11 �P3 P A ARD D S D DF E DRIVE 2 11 125' -0 P3 D\ 1 S LI ° 0 ° 12 -D D Fo -a' D , Fz "m Px r +s m CL z = ce REVOGNS ISE Ps P Qp So °"` TIMBER RIDGE -PART1 ,a n _ �. ���w �.n.a �uw�u a•• ""_ SCALE IN FEET LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: _°ro, , M ..�„ _ mP. °��w °�, °a °�.,�°. ,.w pSHIE17 H '�O � AY' I \ �� s 9< \ Q Il7tRy��� � r �re C3 , ILI Ps o P3 J / � P '- \- \ - X30 P3 ➢A�TASe xo g \ c�NtER HEiraEN � =4ptlp�� - ` P \ \ O \ a \ 13 0 0 2 1 D o Z eo \ \ o � � \ J 121 \ �0 0" W � P2 12 \\ \ \ i re El �� \ �ivr � RIEV ONS P rere_re. A�M,. gyp➢ TIMBER RIDGE - PART 2 LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: DATE SHIEST ��_5 „m E�j DoR a %� P3 e ly ILI z° o ° o' ° BIT ° DR� AAA4. A'° Q ma P 7 LL ° o (TVeI ' e g Rp Q � ' i re °E i'/ �� \ CL _ / o w o -r O cL l o Z lo 1 D - -- so �- ° /y ,LCI n UaNM9J' � � W 2 P _ El RLvoso ®Ns `� °° LIONSHEAD - PART 1 IMMM M ,o.a - m.. n „....r.a [Way. SCALE IN FEET �< LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: DAT LD E. F� Mi � j flii� � m ED �MV� � /✓ ✓ ✓✓/P PApK,Na ENTRY n y 1 oe BOLLAF 5 a' _ 0 P EH[re SI ° y w uo„eemoe rty E DRIVE/ Pz BL1 p p BILL ga o l P2 L Pz PT U CL �,� L Imo✓ � U a ly J 8 P2 s W < N R v,s,oN, ,°a L LION SHEAD - PART 2 SCALE IN FEET °a zo° o LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: DATE IA '17 L� °J N. s �1� h UvTIRSTATE -70 E PS P1 ° Pi x Pv a Pn F3 ias�"�0 5 a� ar • as 30' - J p I1 0 2s'- D " -0.. 2 ._ Pi Pv Pi pi Pz vy ,. r � 35 0 uorvs v anxxxrvc srxo< n¢ 0 -0 6D' -D' 35 -D 5' -D' 3s -0 OBS' -0' S.Q 65 -0 P H � 0 -0 - �% � \ Ps a 3� ED �� �� a APR � o J 6 C[ Q <Q b war �� unw ac�vi„tr twin- vt��i..wt �.�t �wr. aru. i�w.vioiw ire o �,� - """' "' •a "" m '° ^' - "^' " " "' °"' " °°'"'"` LIONSHEAD - PART 3 u r LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: DATE p SHIE£d' LD -8 � y i:s��Filid ,so_o Q �: pp � -� — P- aRVE P o �- INT RS 7 T o I ❑ -. s I m �\ nas Dame 7 O runCE / O Ps - ^ 1 \� aE�ocni[D r�pc�coL[s \ ROB � \ ss -o I 65 � o � I � ry °P, o cL oaivE zs' -o '- - easy P° U oo- �E s.N ,E TO aEMAN F o P, 7 1 U a <s -o ss' -a' as -o ®. - cT e s o ❑ o _ W ox ee,says F _ llr . RE FELOCA -IEO AYE "' oFNE Z a� o-'� TOO TOO 200 VAIL VILLAGE - PART 1 J LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: i DATE ,m bbwa INT ' ERS TSTE, yo � - Ps izs'_o Ipi Ps uo ._ o : ° of Ps P -- __�__ P a3 Ps _ �- P, — Ps -° —�� °B PS P,e FUTUPE RELOCATE °u ° „ zs DFI ° 9 15 P5 P 0 a _ d�� / CL OF � �� 3� � � 5 ore uE P - �� 3� ol ED \ �_� PS PS R6\A fP ° ? —�� z g —o C oR�� �� °� cE �� � � a � RXINX ST S- U r U \ Z 9 C7 CL R OF R oren� __ter � CL ` c CD ' i I a lo REVOSO ®Ns TOO NLE nE I am�° .. VAIL VILLAGE - PART 2 J p➢ SCALE iN FEE1 � �m.m..,�. i � w �� aa �..a. LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: DATE SHIE£G DR. �� °1® Q Sr Tp 7p \ l as FR pV J CE @�qD ,as - o —�� IN TERSTgT E _ 7p p P 11 3 11 P — 3 ilo I ' \ \ _ _ _�_ u a \� _ l o F 6 '\ mI REV600Ns IM. °" - VAIL VILLAGE - PART 3 r ,a.. - rw, " " "w. =m ".. =u "mw SCALE IN FEET " =w< LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: pSHIE£G Q m = Q I � j — B I f O go U < Z � — o F U a Lj CL ce ^ / I nil RI v...GRIS VAIL VILLAGE - PART 4 J SCALE IN FEET IMMM »n m.m...�. it Pr.� A� LIGHTING PLAN NOTES: DATER qwe ���� �•�••�� pSHIEFG Pz \; 'Pill Hill �3 _ �= P o — a o V s —m�ie1 \� �i�,b - — P, F r J 6 D s TotiE z El I\ REVOSOGws W EST VAIL - PART 1 GENERAL NOTES: Wma Sri ',T WW+ o,,�-,w?%.�INmx�G��I �w o IM zao DATE =1 nww m a.m SCALE IN FEET LE17 E. / �i I i N ZONE LL. F2 -- N —Z E3 _ =Yr - __ _ _ - � ate, g - - U El REVOGNS I F WEST VAIL - PART 2 GENERAL NOTES: N 100 0 100 DATE SCALE w reeL eavxizmu rwnwe vnms ianixo uanee ate. ww. �. , „.,oP SHEET Pp-2 i file � °I; \- \ Ulf ol IE 3 ce E L y ❑ ELF REVISIGNS WEST VAIL - PARTS GENERAL NOTES: N ......o G.n�wa wM,. o,m,a� ioo a ioo 200 DATE rwnwo xnms �onixo uu�oe aw. ww. �" o� �o SCALE IN FEET SHEET Pp-3 E��j $jt4f 'P ill Hill o l �Ild r - -_ -. v v lo l o F— c e 1 17 \ 77 \ , ' REVISIGNS Z ONE ---- - - - - -- TIMBER RIDGE - PART 1 GENERAL NOTES: N tob o ioo 200 DATE aves; mm scene IN rEI SHIEFG N. �p�� u - - -- \ \ ✓ \�\ \\ FELT 1 1 P 9 L p 3 0 e �\ L 3 N - ZONE 10 o y �� __ - =ONE I ALT N, ,A e v o CL A \ S — ZONE 7 ALT t P \ I. — ZONE S S ZONES \ \ s _ eR . 3 , o z EA r, A \� \\ s,- ZONE 7 \ \ .. ..o.o ®H. y A > TIMBER RIDGE - PART 2 GENERAL NOTES: DATE naves; mm rxunwe vnms ianwo uanee aw. ww. "' , P ,00 0 Too 200 AE z mrcx,w e a momrp eows um ma uo-srzx rux °0R1 SCALE IN FEET i / / Q .PP3 3Z ONE ALT E - , .� - S - ZONE 10 _ v ,> �. `\ e� S- ZONE 7 ALT• { F _ o ol Q — g .,, o a U z 2 o z " U a � J 8 y- —" REV GN 7 ZONE 7 � , - - � - '- - --- LIONSHEAD -PART 1 \ Di i J GENERAL NOTES: ,aA zao DATE naves; mm SHIEST N. J I M — zoN- ,- E e c / F o ` o „ P e lo ce i° �® N REVOGNS loo LIONSHEAD - PART 2 - • =� =gy=m -� SCPLE w ree. GENERAL NOTES: naves; mm rwnwe vnms ianixo uanee ate. ww. . , „.,oP LE17 �Rx�aa�o��RO�a,oGaP �� 's f ia �� E���TEP-TATS � — � � E m ! r 3 Pi A, a� o S_ ZONE ,z P5 ° rt, a ll ..o LL 0 CL � / J Q <Q b LIONSHEAD —PART3 :1 GENERAL NOTES: REV6O GNS rw. mrrox wo us craw run SCALE iN FEE DApE r SHIEFd UT °� HIM! ;, jgl�g jlfl�i�irl L ,) . A ol CL �a��aApp 4r. ❑� �� �� \ ` 3 le lo UP3 U a Ely ce o z El 3 _ ❑ � �� —� �rzzoNE,A REVOSO ®NS VAIL VILLAGE- PART 1 GENERAL NOTES: 200 �L DATE navxi zmu ECALE IN FEET LE17 �. ill !II l l LL. PC's o P, p , a3 o l .� C \ - a s v W Pi , I El y Z_ VAIL VILLAGE - PART 2 �* GENERAL NOTES: Too o Too zoo rvnnwo xnms:onxo uo-noe aa,. wM. �. o,m,a� seaLe IN veer DATE naves; »ro rwnwe vnms ianixo uanee ate. ww. �. , „.,oP SHIFT Pp-10 o ri � LL. e PC PC . .... ........ .. 17 � �' r� �. P, I o � ARK O u � , s — zoNe �s d� g '� Lj _ � lo I F El N a \ / d _ I - - - - -- - - - -- — — �EVO�o ®N� VAIL VILLAGE -PART,3 -- -- -- GENERAL NOTES roo 0 wM..x o.re„a SALE IN FEE DATE �.w rwnwe vnms ianixo uanee ate. ww. . , „.,oP SHEET , G� � _ %'.',' �o��RO �a,oaP �� �p��� fp t ►4f ' } Q m LI -- -- Yy 3 --- - - - - -- -- I O S - ZONE is O 3 CL \� r ? o - -� - -- F LL U a J 6 i c / N a c R`VO..GN, VAIL VILLAGE - PART 4 So 2 C L SCALE IN FEET GENERAL NOTES: naves; mm rwnwe vnms ianixo uanee ate. ww. �. , „.,oP L117 �Rx�aa�o��RO�a�,oGaP �� 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Resolution No. 8, Series of 2010, a Resolution Approving an Intergovernmental Mutual Aid Agreement for the Provision of Law Enforcement Services and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. PRESENTER(S): Dwight Henninger ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 8, Series of 2010. BACKGROUND: The Town of Vail and the Eagle County Sheriff's Office entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement on March 16, 2010, authorizing the Municipal Officers to perform law enforcement functions and enforce the state laws within portions of Eagle County. The surrounding Eagle County municipalities, including the town, wish to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement allowing the Municipal Officer's to aid and assist each other by the exchange of Municipal Officers services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 8, Series of 2010. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 8, Series of 2010 Law Enforcement IGA 5/18/2010 RESOLUTION NO. 8 Series of 2010 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the "Town "), in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado and the Town Charter (the "Charter "); and WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council ") have been duly elected and qualified; and WHEREAS, in 2009 the Town and Eagle County Sheriffs Office entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement ( "IGA ") authorizing the Municipal Officers to perform law enforcement functions and enforce the State law's within portions of unincorporated Eagle County as necessary in the interest of public safety; and WHEREAS, the Town and the surrounding municipalities in Eagle County (the "County Municipalities ") wish to enter into a similar IGA authorizing the Municipal Officers ( "Officers ") to aid and assist each other by exchange of services when an Officer observes a felony, misdemeanor, crime, or other statutory offense being committed while that Officer is engaged in official police duties. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. The Council hereby approves the IGA and authorizes the Town Manager to enter into the IGA with the County Municipalities on behalf of the Town for the aid and assistance of law enforcement services in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A and in a form approved by the Town Attorney. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail held this 18 day of May, 2010. Richard Cleveland Town Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Resolution No. 8, Series 2010 5/18/2010 11 -1 -1 MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL AID, (hereinafter referred to as this "Agreement ") is made and entered into this day of , 2010, by and between the Town of Avon, Town of Basalt, Town of Eagle, Town of Minturn, and Town of Vail upon their authorized execution of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Parties" or singularly as "Party"), by and through their respective Town and City Councils. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Colorado General Assembly has authorized such intergovernmental mutual aid agreements by the provisions of C.R.S. §29 -1 -203 and §29 -5 -101 through §29 -5 -109; and WHEREAS, the Parties are empowered to provide law enforcement functions within its incorporated boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Parties peace officers are defined by C.R.S. § 16 -3 -110 (1)(a) ( "Municipal Officers ") and are authorized by their Municipalities and the terms of C.R.S. § 16 -3 -110 to act when a felony or misdemeanor is committed in a Municipal Officer's presence regardless of whether that Municipal Officer is within their jurisdictional boundaries or whether that Municipal Officer is on duty; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to aid and assist each other by the exchange of Municipal Officers services when a Municipal Officer observes a felony, misdemeanor, crime, or other statutory offense being committed while that Municipal Officer is engaged in official police duties; and WHEREAS, it is recognized by the Parties to this Agreement that the public health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of their respective jurisdictions would be best served by providing back -up response and protection services, should the need arise; and WHEREAS, each party will in good faith, make an attempt to assist the other based on their needs and specific request. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The Parties, through their Police Departments, will be authorized to provide general law enforcement services in other jurisdictions to the extent and the manner hereinafter set forth. For purposes of this agreement, general law enforcement services shall consist of responding to, investigating, and enforcing violations of the Colorado Criminal Code or other Colorado statute that the Municipal Officers are authorized to enforce in a manner consistent with the level of performance of peace officers throughout the State of Colorado. 2. The Parties, through their Police Department, will be authorized to act and otherwise provide general law enforcement services in any situation in which a felony, misdemeanor, crime or other statutory offense has been or is being committed in such Municipal Officer's presence when such Municipal Officer is in other jurisdictional boundaries due to official police duties. l 5/18/2010 11 -2 -1 3. As for Municipal Officers, management of the rendering of services, leadership and supervision, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers and other matters incident to the performance of law enforcement services and the review of personnel so employed, shall remain with the Party. 4. All citations written by a Municipal Officer for violations of any Colorado State Statute or law shall command the alleged violator to appear before the jurisdiction of where the violation was committed. The Municipal Officer shall be available to appear before that jurisdiction's Municipal Court as needed to prosecute each violation. 5. The Parties shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, equipment, and all supplies necessary to maintain the service to be rendered herein. 6. Each Party shall give prompt and due consideration to all requests from the other Party regarding delivery of general law enforcement services and shall work cooperatively to achieve the service called for herein. Such request may be transmitted in person, by phone, radio, electronic medium, or by a third party. Any reasonable transmittal shall be sufficient to invoke this Agreement. 7. The Parties enter into this Agreement as separate, independent governmental entities and officials and shall maintain such status throughout. Employees assigned under this Agreement shall be considered and shall remain employees of their respective law enforcement agencies at all times and for all purposes under this Agreement 8. To the extent allowed by law, each Party agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless each other, their respective agents, officers, and employees of and from any and all loss, costs, damages, injuries, liabilities, claims, liens, demands, actions and causes of actions brought by a third party, whatsoever, arising out of or related to the respective Party's performance or nonperformance under this Agreement. No Party shall be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negligent acts of any other Party. By agreeing to this provision, the Parties do not waive or intend to waive the limitations on liability which are provided to the Parties under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. § 24 -10 -101, et seq. The provisions of C.R.S. § 29 -5 -108 shall not apply to activities conducted pursuant to this Agreement. 9. Each Party shall provide its own public liability and property damage insurance coverage as it may deem necessary for any potential liability arising from the services to be provided under this Agreement. 10. Unless sooner terminated as provided hereunder, this Agreement shall be effective from the date of its execution though December 31, 2010. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, either Party, with or without cause, may terminate this Agreement upon the giving of ten (10) days prior written notice of such termination to the other respective Party. It is the intent of the Parties that this Agreement shall be renewed for additional one (1) year periods following the end of the initial period, and unless one of the Parties gives notice to the other at least ten (10) days prior to the end of the initial period, or then current additional period, that such Party desires to terminate this Agreement or to re- negotiate the terms, this Agreement shall be automatically extended for additional periods of twelve (12) months. After the initial period, this Agreement shall run from January 1 to December 31 of each respective year. 2 5/18/2010 11 -2 -2 11. The Parties agree that this Agreement is contingent upon all funds necessary for the performance of this Agreement being budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available. It is expressly understood that any financial obligations that may arise hereunder, whether direct or contingent, shall only extend to payment of monies duly and lawfully appropriated by the governing body of any Party hereto. Should any of the Parties fail to undertake the project because necessary funds have not been budgeted or duly appropriated, this Agreement may be terminated by any Party hereto. 12. This Agreement and the rights and obligations created hereby shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, and may not be assigned by any Party without the prior written consent of the other Parties. 13. Nothing herein expressed or implied is intended or should be construed to confer or give to any person or corporation or governmental entity other than the Parties within this Agreement, any right, remedy or claim under or by reason hereof or by reason of any covenant or condition herein contained. 14. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction as to any Party hereto, such portion shall be deemed severable and its invalidity or its unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions; such remaining provisions shall be fully severable and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid provisions had never been inserted into this Agreement. 15. This Agreement may be amended, modified, or changed in whole or in part only by written agreement duly authorized and executed by the Parties hereto. 16. The law of the State of Colorado shall be applied in the interpretation, execution and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue for any action arising out of any dispute pertaining to this Agreement shall be exclusive in Eagle County, Colorado 17. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of the Parties, and supersedes any prior agreements, discussions, negotiations, representations or understandings of Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and be effective as of the day and year first above written. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 3 5/18/2010 11 -2 -3 'OWN OF VAM . VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: May 18, 2010 ITEM /TOPIC: Resolution No. 15, Series of 2010 a Resolution Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Vail and Eagle County Regarding the Use of Eagle County's 800 MHz Area Wide Smartzone Trunked Radio Services; and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. PRESENTER(S): Dwight Henninger ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 15, Series of 2010. BACKGROUND: Eagle County has installed and maintained an 800 MHz radio system (the "System ") and is offering non - exclusive access of the radio system. The System will allow multi - jurisdictional agencies exclusively to communicate directly with public safety organizations, including but not limited to police activity, code enforcement, fire and emergency and disaster response. This Intergovernmental Agreement formalizes the existing process and gives authorization for a newly formed executive committee to make budget recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 15, Series of 2010. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 15, Series of 2010 Exhibit A IGA 5/18/2010 RESOLUTION NO. 15 Series of 2010 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VAIL AND EAGLE COUNTY REGARDING THE USE OF EAGLE COUNTY'S 800 MHZ WIDE AREA SMARTZONE TRUNKED RADIO SERVICES; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the "Town "), in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado and the Town Charter (the "Charter"); and WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council ") have been duly elected and qualified; and WHEREAS, Eagle County (the "County ") has installed and maintained an 800 MHz radio system (the "System ") which allows multi - jurisdictional agencies to communicate directly with public safety organizations, including but not limited to police activity, code - enforcement, fire, and emergency and disaster response; and WHEREAS, the County is offering non - exclusive access of the System; and WHEREAS, the Town and the County wish to enter into the Intergovernmental Agreement (the "IGA ") formalizing the existing process; and WHEREAS, the Council finds and determines that the non - exclusive access of the System is necessary and will promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Council's approval of Resolution No. 15, Series 2010, is required to enter into an IGA. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. The Council hereby approves the IGA and authorizes the Town Manager to enter into the IGA with the County, in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A and in a form approved by the Town Attorney. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail held this 18 day of May, 2010. Richard Cleveland, Town Mayor ATTEST: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Resolution No. 15, Series 2010 5/18/2010 12 -1 -1 AGREEMENT FOR USE OF EAGLE COUNTY'S 800 MHz WIDE AREA SMARTZONE TRUNKED RADIO SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into this _ day of , 2010, by and between the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, a body corporate and politic, acting by and through its Board of County Commissioners ( "County ") and ( "User Agency "). RECITALS WHEREAS, Eagle County has installed and maintained an 800 MHz radio system (the "System ") and is offering non - exclusive access of the System to other organizations including governments, emergency service responders, and certain other special districts (all of which, together, shall be referred to herein as "User Agencies" as listed in Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, User Agency desires to use the 800 MHz System ( "System ") for infra jurisdiction and inter jurisdiction communications; and WHEREAS, in addition to permitting the User Agency access to the System, User Agency and County desire to establish terms and conditions that will govern the participating organizations use and access to the System; and WHEREAS, additional organizations may be granted access to the System when the Executive Committee determines that such access will be of benefit to the citizens and visitors of Eagle County. These additional organizations shall be referred to as "Cooperating Agencies" and the currently approved Cooperating Agencies are listed in Exhibit A. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1.1 Cooperating Agency: Agencies who do not use the System as their primary radio system but who do use the system to interoperate with User Agencies. 1.2 Executive Committee: A policy advisory group comprised of a representative from each of the User Agencies. 1.3 Steering Groups: Groups who provide technical and/or policy guidance for operation of the System. See Technical Operations and Executive Committee. 1.4 System Manager: An Eagle County employee, assigned by the Eagle County Manager, to provide day to day management of the System. 1.5 Technical Operations Committee: An advisory committee made up of any representative of agencies or entities who have an interest in the operation of the System. 1 5/18/2010 12 -2 -1 1.6 The System: When the term "the system" is used in this agreement it is referring to the 800Mhz radio infrastructure which includes all radio transmitting and receiving sites and related equipment 1.7 User: Any individual operating radio equipment on the System. 1.8 User Agency: Any agency who is approved to have radio equipment operating on the System and who use it as their primary radio system. ARTICLE II TERM & TERMINATION 2.1 The initial term of this Agreement shall be the date set forth above through December 31, 2010. This Agreement shall automatically renew for one -year periods running from January 1 through December 31 of each consecutive year, unless this Agreement is otherwise terminated in accordance with this Agreement or unless either party gives the other written notice of its election not to renew no later than June 30 of the expiring term. 2.2 At anytime during the term of this Agreement, any party aggrieved of a material breach of this Agreement may serve on the other party a written notice describing the breach. If an attempt to cure the breach is not pursued within 30 days after the delivery of the notice, this Agreement shall automatically terminate. 2.3 Upon termination of this Agreement, the User Agency shall immediately reprogram all of its radios containing County template programming and SmartZone system parameters from its equipment at its sole expense. Such reprogramming must be performed by Motorola or a service provider approved by the System Manager as defined in Article IV of this Agreement. 2.4 For government entities only; notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, a government entity shall have no obligations under this Agreement after, nor shall any payments be made towards the System in respect of any period after December 31 of this Agreement's current year without an appropriation therefore by the government entity in accordance with a budget adopted in compliance with all or any of the applicable following laws: Article 25, Title 30 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, the Local Government Budget Law (C.R.S. §29 -1 -101 et.seq.) and the TABOR Amendment (Colorado Constitution, Article X, Sec. 20). ARTICLE III THE 800 MHz SYSTEM 3.1 The System is a radio communications system which allows defined multi - jurisdictional User Agencies and Cooperating Agencies to communicate with one another throughout the geographic reach of the system. System communications depend upon antenna/transmitter- receiver sites which the County may lease and/or sublease from other entities. Said aforementioned sites may be subject to leases of real property which may expire or be terminated. In the event of an expiration or termination of a site lease, the System may become limited in its geographic reach in which case the antennas /transmitter- receivers may need to be relocated at the expense of the User Agencies and Eagle County. Furthermore, the System is subject to electromagnetic and meteorological disruption and to electronic and mechanical failure. The County cannot and does not guarantee the operability of the System as a whole or in 2 5/18/2010 12 -2 -2 any part of its geographic reach; however, the County will use its best efforts to maintain the System. 3.2 The County at the County's discretion will from time to time continue to improve the System. The County will seek input from the Steering Groups regarding any recommended improvements. 3.3 The System shall be used exclusively by organizations that conduct operations as, or directly affiliated with, public safety organizations, including but not limited to police activity, code - enforcement, fire, and emergency & disaster response. 3.4 Any failure, impairment, delay, interruption to the use of the System due to an Act of God or due to any other causes beyond the direct control of the County, shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the County shall not be liable for any injuries, damages, or losses of any nature whatsoever resulting, directly or indirectly, from such failure, impairment, delay or interruption. 3.5 By entering into this Agreement, User Agency accepts the System AS IS , as it presently exists subject to the foregoing limitations. ARTICLE IV THE 800 MHz SYSTEM STEERING GROUPS 4.1 The County will establish the 800 MHz Executive Committee ( "Executive Committee ") for the purposes of assisting the County in administration of the System. The Executive Committee will consist of one designated representative from each User Agency. Cooperating Agencies will not be represented on the Executive Committee. Each User Agency shall submit the name of their designated representative to the System Manager, who is identified below in this Agreement, by January 31 st of each year. The Executive Committee may elect officers for this committee consisting of a Chair, Vice -Chair and Secretary. The County Finance Director, or his designee, shall serve as an advisor to the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee shall meet at least once per year to ratify the following year's budget recommendation to be made to the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners, and at other times at the request of the Executive Committee Chair, Board of Eagle County Commissioners, or in accordance with such bylaws as it may adopt. 4.2 The Eagle County Board of County Commissioners shall make all final budget decisions related to the Eagle County 800 MHz system. The System Manager will present a proposed budget to the Executive Committee no later than June 15` of each year. 4.3 The Executive Committee shall also be responsible for coordinating with all User Agencies and Cooperating Agencies regarding necessary appropriations to cover unforeseen expenses. 4.4 There will be an 800 MHz Technical Operations Committee ( "Tech Ops Committee ") for the purposes of assisting the System Manager in planning for the multi jurisdictional operation of the System. The Tech Ops Committee will consist of representatives from the User Agencies and the Cooperating Agencies. The Tech Ops representatives shall elect positions for this group consisting of a Chair, Vice -Chair and Secretary. The Tech Ops Committee shall meet periodically in accordance with such bylaws as it may adopt, and subject to any request made by 3 5/18/2010 12 -2 -3 the System Manager, the Executive Committee Chair, or the Board of County Commissioners. 4.5 The Executive Committee and Tech Ops Committee are advisory boards to the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners, and are not independent legal entities. ARTICLE V RADIO SYSTEM FEES 5.1 The Executive Committee will annually review the operating cost of the system and recommend the system budget to the Board of County Commissioners. User fees will then be determined for the following calendar year based upon the formula approved by the User Agencies in December of 2009, which formula is attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and incorporated herein by this reference. Recognizing that the costs and revenues from operation of the System must be incorporated into the annual County budget, and the annual budgets of all User Agencies, the Executive Committee will make its budget recommendation to the Eagle County Finance Director and all User Agencies by July 15th of each year, or as soon thereafter as is practicable. 5.2 Invoices will be delivered on or about March 15 of each year with the payment due by April 30` of each year. Invoices not paid by May 15` will be charged interest at a rate of 1.5% monthly (18% A.P.R.). Failure to remit payment within 90 days of the invoice date will be construed as a material breach of this agreement. ARTICLE VI SYSTEM COORDINATION 6.1 A "System Manager" shall be an Eagle County employee and shall be appointed by the Eagle County Manager. 6.2 The System Manager will take recommendations from the radio system Tech Ops Committee and will supervise and/or coordinate all work performed on the System. 6.3 Each User Agency shall designate a "Radio Coordinator" who will serve as the point of contact between the User Agencies and System Manager. A designation of the Radio Coordinator shall be made by notice in writing to the System Manager, and may be changed at User Agency's discretion by written notice to the System Manager. 6.4 The System Manager is responsible for reviewing and approving template designs for all User Agencies. 6.5 Neither a User Agency nor any employee, representative, agent or volunteer thereof may change talk group names, talk group functions, talk group aliases or any other programming without the recommendation of the Tech Ops Committee and the approval of the System Manager, who shall approve the change unless it will or may disrupt use or management of the System. 4 5/18/2010 12 -2 -4 6.6 Only persons approved by the System Manger will be allowed to program a User Agency's radios and other equipment. ARTICLE VII EQUIPMENT 7.1 No equipment may be installed at any remote site, including the master site, by any User Agency without the express written consent of the System Manager. User Agencies, through user fees, support the operation and maintenance of remote site equipment. Remote site equipment includes, but is not limited to: antennas, transmission lines, RF repeaters, microwave and land - based transport and multiplexing equipment, power supplies and backup power generation and storage. Also included are the central zone controller, servers and interface equipment at the master site. The cost of maintenance, repair and regularly scheduled replacement of these components is a part of the system budget. It is possible that lightning, wildfire, wind, flooding or other natural events as well as arson, sabotage or other acts of man may cause significant damage to multiple pieces of equipment at a site, or render the entire site inoperable. Should this occur, and replacement cannot be funded from insurance or the general operating budget, an appropriation and special assessment may be requested by the System Manager and ordered by the Executive Committee. 7.2 User Agency is solely responsible for the compatibility of its equipment with the System, even if that equipment has been approved by the System Manager, whose approvals are not intended to and do not constitute a promise or warranty of compatibility. User Agency acknowledges that the System is proprietary technology, and that equipment by other manufacturers (and some Motorola equipment) may not be compatible. User Agency acknowledges that it has familiarized itself with the technical characteristics of the System and of the types of equipment compatible with it. 7.3 All radio units must be approved by the System Manager before they are used on or programmed for use on the System. ARTICLE VIII PROGRAMMING 8.1 Programming requires one radio template for each model of radio and each feature sets in that radio. All patches, permanent or temporary, to conventional (UHFNHF) radio channels must be approved by the System Manager before they become operational, including patches controlled by Public Safety Electronics Banks, 800 MHz Control/Desktop Stations, Mobile and Portable Radios. ARTICLE IX SYSTEM RULES OF USE 9.1 FCC RULES Eagle County holds licenses from FCC for the operation of the System. User Agency and its employees, representatives, agents and volunteers shall comply with the all terms of the license and all federal, state, local laws, and orders and regulations with respect to the User Agency's 5 5/18/2010 12 -2 -5 use of the System. 9.2 SCAN User Agency will use the Radio "SCAN" feature at its own risk. The County is not responsible for loss of radio traffic to the User's radio when using scan and roaming throughout the network. 9.3 DISABLING RADIOS It is possible for a User Agency's radio to "drag" voice traffic to a radio site, thus causing unnecessary power consumption and system loading. The System Manager reserves the right to disable a radio from one or more sites when the System Manager or Technical Operations Committee determines that a radio is having an adverse impact on the radio system. 9.4 INTERFERENCE After initial installation, should any interference result from the User Agency's operation of its equipment the County may order corrective measures which may include deactivating the equipment. Use and activities which are or may be causing the interference shall be deactivated as soon as practical but no longer than two (2) days after being notified by the System Manager. The User Agency shall be responsible and shall assume the cost of corrective measures needed to eliminate the interference to the satisfaction of the System Manager. ARTICLE X SECURITY 10.1 User Agency may not loan, issue or assign any radios on a permanent or temporary basis to any outside person(s) or organization without a written authorization by the System Manager. 10.2 No radio service software ( "RSS ") modifications can be made to the units or central electronics (CEB) consoles without the written approval of the System Manager. These modifications include the System ID number, control channels, connect tones, call alert parameters, secure parameters, emergency channels, as well as options in future RSS software releases not listed herein. User Agency will be responsible and will assume the cost of the corrective measures needed to eliminate System problems due to any unauthorized radio software modifications. ARTICLE XI MISCELLANEOUS 11.1 This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of Colorado. Venue for any action arising out of any dispute pertaining to this Agreement shall be in the State of Colorado District Court in and for Eagle County, Colorado. 11.2 This Agreement, and the rights and obligations created hereby, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of County and User Agency. Nothing herein expressed or implied is intended or should be construed to confer or give to any person or entity other than County or User Agency, any right, remedy or claim under or by reason hereof or by reason of any covenant or condition herein contained. 6 5/18/2010 12 -2 -6 11.3 If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed severable and its invalidity or its unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions; such remaining provision shall be fully severable and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid provision had never been inserted into this Agreement. 11.4 This Agreement may be amended, modified, changed, or terminated in whole or in part only by written agreement duly authorized and executed by both County and User Agency. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of County and User Agency and supersedes any prior agreements, discussions, negotiations, representations or understandings of County and User Agency with respect to the subject matter contained herein. 11.5 The parties hereto agree that neither has made or authorized any agreement with respect to the subject matter of this instrument other than expressly set forth herein, and no oral representation, promise, or consideration different from the terms herein contained shall be binding on either party, or its agents or employees hereto. 11.6 All of the covenants herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefits of the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns. 7 5/18/2010 12 -2 -7 COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, by and through its Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: By: Sara J. Fisher, Chairman Clerk to the Board TOWN OF VAIL, by and through its Town Council ATTEST: By: Dick Cleveland, Mayor Town Clerk 18 5/18/2010 12 -2 -8 Exhibit A User Agencies Cooperating Agencies Eagle County Government Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District Eagle County Health Service District Colorado Department of Transportation Eagle County School District Colorado State Patrol Eagle River Fire Protection District Federal Bureau of Investigation Eagle River Water & Sanitation District United States Forest Service Greater Eagle Fire Protection District Vail Resorts Gypsum Fire Protection District Cordillera Public Safety Rock Creek Fire Department Lone Star Security Town of Avon Valagua Metropolitan District Town of Eagle Town of Minturn Town of Vail Vail Valley Medical Center Western Eagle County Ambulance District 21 5/18/2010 12 -2 -9 Exhibit B Radio System Invoicing Formula We have instituting a tiered funding formula for the Eagle County 800MHz system beginning with the 2010 budget year. 1. Funding for the anticipated radio infrastructure maintenance cost of $408,235 will be based on the percentage of radio system usage with the system logs for each talkgroup on a weekly basis. Weekly usage percentages have been averaged for each agency talkgroup and the dispatch talkgroups which will be divided amongst the agencies who are the users of that dispatch talkgroup based upon their percentage of dispatch center use. 2. Subscriber unit (radios) maintenance will be based each year upon the current cost of the depot service contract. For 2010 the cost is $90 per radio. 3. A contingency fund may be created in later years based upon a capital assessment added to the user agency's fee. Shown as an additional percentage added to the annual fee 4. A Foundation Fee schedule based upon the user agency's inventory (See Table) ❑ 1— 5 units $500 ❑ 101 -125 units = $26,000 ❑ 6 -10 units $2,000 ❑ 126 -150 units= $34,000 ❑ 11 -25 units $4,000 ❑ 151 -175 units = $40,000 ❑ 26 -50 units $8,000 ❑ 175 -200 units = $46,000 ❑ 51 -75 units = $14,000 ❑ 201+ Units $52,000 ❑ 76 -100 units = $20,000 The user agencies inventory on January l s ` will constitute the means for Foundation Fee Calculation. Any agency adding to their inventory during the year will be pro -rated a fee based upon the remaining portion of the year multiplied by the agency's average fee per radio. Agencies will not receive a refund for reducing their inventory. 22 5/18/2010 12 -2 -10