Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-02-21 Agenda and Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 1:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 21, 2012 T0I!'V?J OF A 7L9" NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. Public comments on work session item may be solicited by the Town Council. ITEM /TOPIC: Site Visit - Vail Village Townhomes District (20 min.) PRESENTER(S): Bill Gibson 2. ITEM /TOPIC: Site Visit - Vail Valley Drive Construction Project (weather dependent) (30 min.) PRESENTER(S): Tom Kassmel /Chad Salli 3. ITEM /TOPIC: Site Visit - Lionshead Welcome Center (30 min. ) 4. ITEM /TOPIC: DRB /PEC Update (15 min.) PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell 5. ITEM /TOPIC: Discussion of 2012 Community Survey Questions. (30 min.) PRESENTER(S): Suzanne Silverthorn & Chris Cares ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide direction to staff on areas of focus for 2012 Community Survey. BACKGROUND: The Town of Vail community survey is used to probe public policy issues and solicit feedback on other topics of community interest. It is also used to measure the town's operational performance as compared with previous years. The most recent surveys were conducted in 2003, 2005 and 2010. A 2012 survey is planned to coincide with the new Town Council term and to benchmark municipal service levels. The purpose of the discussion is to develop a list of community issues and topics to be included in the survey and to finalize methodology and schedule. 6. ITEM /TOPIC: Information Updates and Attachments: 1) VEAC Minutes from February 14, 2012 - Kelli McDonald 2) December 2011 All Store Same Store Sales Report - Kelli McDonald 3) AIPP Board member number and term revisions consideration - Molly Eppard 2/21/2012 4) Vail Valley Athlete Commission: The Commission convened February 14 to award grants to qualified local winter athletes. The Commission is composed of three members: Vail Valley Foundation ($10,000), Vail Resorts ($10,000) and the Town of Vail ($6,000). It was jointly decided to set aside a greater amount for summer athletes than in the past, based on the growing number of summer sports and participants. Those awarded grant money: Kathlyn Samuelson - Alpine Ski Racing: $1,500 (pending) Lucas Evans - Freestyle Skiing (Slopestyle /Big Air): $2,000 Dylan Bidez - Snowboarding: $2,000 (pending) Heidi Kloser - Mogul Skiing: $4,000 Sylvan Ellefson - Cross Country Skiing: $4,000 Taylor Seaton - Skiing Halfpipe: $2,000 Katharine Irwin - Alpine Skiing: $1,500 (15 min.) PRESENTER(S): Various 7. ITEM /TOPIC: Matters from Mayor and Council (15 min.) 8. ITEM /TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C. R. S. §24- 6- 402(4)(a)(b) (e) - to discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of property interests; to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Re: Discussion concerning negotiations regarding Ever Vail Redevelopment Agreement. (45 min. ) PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire & Stan Zemler 9. ITEM /TOPIC: Adjournment (4:35 p.m.) NOTE: UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW (ALL ARE APPROXIMATE DATES AND TIMES AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) -- - - - - -- ------------ THE NEXT REGULAR VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 12:30 P.M. (or TBD), TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2012 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: March 6, 2012: Vail Local Marketing District - Separate Meeting - John Dawsey - 3/6 - 30 min. Work Session: Task Force recommendation to Council re: permanent funding for special events - Mia Vlaar /Kelli McDonald - 3/6 - 30 min. - WS VLMDAC recommendation on infrastructure needs - Beth Slifer /Kelli McDonald - 30 min - WS 3/6 Info Update 3/6: VLHA Update - Nina; Revenue Highlights - Kathleen; - WS Future extensions to entitled projects - Warren - 15 min. - 3/6 - WS Sundial Plaza - Greg Hall - 3/6 Evening Meeting Municipal Site Redevelopment RFP Award- George - 60 min. - ES - 3/6 2/21/2012 Resolution #12, 2012 - VLMD Budget Approval - Kathleen - 5 min - 3/6 ES Ever Vail - Warren /George - 60 min. - ES Ord #2 - 1st reading - WTH District - Bill G - 30 min.- ES Resolution #7 - WTH District - Bill G - 30 min. - ES Consent Agenda: 1) February 7 and 21 meeting minutes; 5 min. - ES Town Manager Report - Naming of LH Welcome Center Community Room; 15 min. - ES Ford Park Planning - Todd O. /Greg H - 30 min. - 3 /6 -PEC submittal approval; 3/20- update as needed; 4 /17- Resolution approval; 6/5- update as needed; and 8/7- Contract Award Amendment to LMU1 - Rachel - 60 min. - 3/6 - ES Guest Enhancement Wayfinding Discussion - Greg H - 30 min - WS - 3/6 March 20, 2012: RSES - Katherine Lange, Principal - WS - 3/20 - 15 min. OTC - Executive Session - 3/20 - Matt Mire - 30 min. OTC - Evening - 3/20 - Matt - 45 min. Strategic Parking Plan - Greg Hall - 60 min. - 3/20 TBD: Council and Eagle County Commissioners joint meeting - 4/3 - 4:00 p.m. Gore Creek Water Quality Update - Bill Carlson - TBD Eagle County School District - Sandra Smyser - 30 min. - WS - TBD Kent Logan Appreciation Letter Proclamation - 5 min. - TBD RSES Elementary 5th Grade Government Studies Class Q &A - 30 min. WS (1:00 p.m.) Comcast Discussion - Ron Braden /Matt Mire 60 min. - TBD Outdoor Display Goods - George Ruther - TBD Sara Schleper Recognition - TBD Donovan Pricing - TBD Historic District - TBD TOV Project Updates - TBD Work Plan - TBD 2/21/2012 K � TOWN OF VAI!% VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: Site Visit - Vail Village Townhomes District PRESENTER(S): Bill Gibson 2/21/2012 K � TOWN OF VAI!% VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: Site Visit - Vail Valley Drive Construction Project (weather dependent) PRESENTER(S): Tom Kassmel /Chad Salli ATTACHMENTS: Vail Valley Drive Memorandum 2/21/2012 TOWN OF VAI To: From: Date: Subject Town Council Public Works 2 -20 -12 Vail Valley Drive Reconstruction Background Memorandum Vail Valley Drive, from the Ford Park Soccer Field parking lot to Sunburst Drive, has been scheduled for reconstruction for the past 15 years. The initial concept was a complete road reconstruction, including drainage improvements and a sidewalk/bike path to accommodate the Gore Valley Trail that runs along this stretch of road. The sidewalk was included to separate vehicular traffic from pedestrians, particularly from the bus traffic that runs along Vail Valley Drive. The project has evolved over the last 10 years, eliminating the sidewalk /bike path and reducing the amount of curb and gutter by over two thirds. Numerous bike path alternatives were analyzed, including; rerouting bicyclists onto the South Frontage Rd, along Gore Creek, along the current alignment of the Vail Trail or portions of it, and providing a widened shoulder along Vail Valley Drive. Ultimately the direction of Council has been to not include a bike path and implement a share the road policy for this portion of Vail Valley Drive. The project was scheduled for construction and budgeted for in 2011. However prior to bidding the project in the Spring of 2011, ERWSD expressed a potential interest in cost sharing a portion of the project and replacing infrastructure. It was deemed appropriate to hold the project until ERWSD could confirm their position. After a thorough analysis, ERWSD determined that the upgrades to their infrastructure are not needed. As a result of this determination, staff has completed final construction documents and the project is ready to bid. In order to bid and award the project in 2012, the 2011 project budget will have to be rolled into the 2012 budget. The remaining 2011 budget for construction of the project is $1.8 million. The current estimated construction budget for the project is $1.6 million. If approved, the project is currently anticipated to start in May and be completed by September. 2/21/2012 2 -1 -I K � TOWN OF VAI!% VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: Site Visit - Lionshead Welcome Center 2/21/2012 K � TOWN OF VAI!% VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: DRB /PEC Update PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell ATTACHMENTS: February 13, 2012 PEC Meeting Results February 15, 2012 DRB Meeting Results 2/21/2012 rawN of va PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION February 13, 2012 1:OOpm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Bill Pierce John Rediker Henry Pratt Michael Kurz Tyler Schneidman Pam Hopkins Luke Cartin 45 minutes A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a prescribed regulations amendment, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to amend Chapter 12 -22, View Corridors, Vail Town Code, to allow for the maintenance of designated view corridors impacted by vegetation, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110056) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Recommendation of approval MOTION: Pratt SECOND: Hopkins VOTE: 3 -3 -0 (Kurz, Cartin, Schniedman) The motion failed to be approved. There were no other motions made. Warren Campbell made a presentation per the Staff memorandum. Commissioner Kurz stated that this topic came up previously. He stated that he believes the Design Review Board made appropriate finding in taking their action. He stated that he was concerned about the long term effects of the removal of healthy trees and the environmental charge of the Commission. The view corridors today are narrow and many have building and streetscape element encroachments. He added that with the new larger buildings being constructed view corridors are not a viable concept. He stated that the proposal does not make sense and he is against the amendment. Commissioner Cartin asked who would be responsible for removal of a tree on private property should it be deemed to be detrimental to a view corridor. Warren Campbell responded that the Town would work with a private property owner to address all issues. Commissioner Cartin asked what the threshold would be to determine whether the tree was detrimental. Warren Campbell responded that criteria were not included in order to allow the DRB to make these determinations as they do currently for all landscaping changes. He added that all view corridor points originate on public property, although many cross private property. Pa gg 1 2/21 /2� 12 4 -1 -I Commissioner Cartin stated that there needs to be a balance between water quality and view corridors, as many of the trees in the photos of view corridors are trees along Gore Creek. With stream health becoming a paramount concern recently he is sensitive to the need to shade and stabilize the creek with trees. Commissioner Schneidman stated that he was curious about other communities that have view corridors and how they address this vary issue. Commissioner Pierce stated he is in support of the proposal as he felt the DRB could make the determination if landscaping was detrimental to a particular view corridor. The amendments provided flexibility, but would also prevent removal without consideration of the purpose of the view corridor. Commissioner Hopkins stated that healthy forests with trees of varying ages would be helpful for maintaining forested health and promoting water quality. She added that to maintain views tree maintenance was necessary. Warren Campbell clarified that the proposal would only allow for removal of trees in adopted view corridors and not views from private property. There was no public comment. Henry Pratt made a motion to recommend approval. Pam Hopkins 2n the motion. The vote was 3 -3 -0. The motion failed to be approved. Commissioner Kurz stated the view corridors are antiquated. Commissioner Schneidman said it would be better to say "no greater than what is necessary ..." to ensure the minimal amount of alteration was applied for and approved. Commissioner Cartin stated that the trees break up bulk and mass of the large scale buildings and sacrificing large trees that are appealing to the general public to save a certain angle of a certain view is not worth it. He added that the review of the alteration of landscaping in a view corridor was subjective. He continued by asking if trees were a part of a view corridor and added to its appeal or are they detrimental? Commissioner Pierce asked Commissioner Schneidman if there were any changes he would propose to the language which would gain his support? Commissioner Schneidman stated no. Commissioner Kurz stated maintenance of view corridors including trimming would be ok, but not removal of healthy trees. He stated that view corridors are very narrow and you don't even know you're looking through a corridor unless you're in a very specific location. Commissioner Pierce added that the view corridors are not static and you can see them through many different points. Commissioner Hopkins stated that she was on the Commission when the view corridors were established. They were established after Beaver Creek was built and very few views were preserved to the natural environment. The view corridors are achieving their intent.T Pa gg 2 2/21 /2� 12 4 -1 -2 Warren Campbell outlined how view corridors have been established in conjunction with the introduction of new buildings in the Town. Commissioner Kurz stated that removal of a tree for to achieve a view corridor in Colorado is offensive. 60 minutes 2. A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council for prescribed regulations amendments to Title 12, Zoning Regulations and Title 14, Development Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12 -3 -7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to provide regulations that will implement sustainable building and planning standards, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC090028) Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Rachel Dimond/ Kristen Bertuglia ACTION: Tabled to March 12, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0 Kristen Bertuglia made a presentation per the Staff memorandum. Building Design Commissioner Kurz asked if composting would be required in a home. Kristen Bertuglia responded that composting areas could count as recycling areas, but would not be required. Regarding heat tape, Commissioner Pierce stated that ice damming can be avoided with other regulations. Commissioner Hopkins stated that gutters can be problematic, and that unless you have larger gutters, there is always dripping. Commissioner Kurz stated that one major issue is roof forms shedding water onto parking lots that turns to ice as in his neighborhood. Kristen Bertuglia responded that you want to hold snow or divert melted snow from the driveway and walkways. Commissioner Pratt stated that a roof that is meant to hold snow and doesn't have gutters will still drip when melting. He added that there are many points that one can change after final approval. Commissioner Pierce stated that insulation can prevent ice damming. Warren Campbell asked if you can put controls on heat tape. Commissioner Pierce stated that some heat tape is triggered by temperature. Commissioner Cartin stated that Vail Resorts has heat tape with temperature controls. Commissioner Pierce questioned allowing water to drip on the ground. Commissioner Pratt said if the policy is to reduce heat tape, this is one way to do that. Pa gg 3 2/21 /2� 12 4 -1 -3 Landscaping and Irrigation Commissioner Cartin asked how large trees are to be protected. Warren Campbell responded that all trees on the survey would be subject to this point. Commissioner Pratt stated that 2 feet from the trunk would not save the tree, but it may help prevent materials be stored against it. Commissioner Hopkins asked if we can require or incentive healthy trees through watering and injections, or hiring an arborist to ensure the health of the tree. Commissioner Pratt stated that the defensible space could be added to this discussion. Commissioner Pierce stated that 2 feet is not enough to save a tree. Commissioner Pratt asked if this applies to properties with irrigation only. Commissioner Cartin stated that Vail uses more water in summer than in winter per the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District. Commissioner Pratt stated that the landscape requirements are pretty heavy, and now, 20 years later, you can't see the house. He said it was a problem to force people to replace trees, especially aspens. It should only be required for spruce trees. He said it should be more flexible. Commissioner Hopkins stated that on Mill Creek Circle, there are houses with massive trees that would be difficult to replace foot - for -foot. Commissioner Pierce stated that there are some projects that used poor site development tactics that ended up with removing every tree on the property. In some cases on Forest Road, there is no way to put those trees back on the site. Warren Campbell asked if the way a tree is measured should be clarified. Trees considered 6 feet in height count the root ball as well, and the actual tree is only 4 -5 feet tall. Both Commissioner Pratt and Pierce said the DRB should be the decision maker on tree replacement. Commissioner Kurz stated that Aspens proliferate but other trees do not. Commissioner Hopkins stated that some landscaping is worth removing. Commissioner Pratt stated that portions of landscaping that are sod should be split into a few levels of points. Commissioner Pierce said the grass blocks are tough to plow. Commissioner Hopkins asked if sand set block would count as permeable. Commissioner Cartin added that any fees applied through the program should be used only for the mitigation of environmental impacts for which it was collected. Pa gg 4 2/21 /2� 12 4 -1 -4 Commissioner Pratt said some negative aspects of building should result in negative points (i.e. more turf grass could result in negative points that would need to be made up elsewhere in the checklist). 5 minutes 3. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13 -12, Exemption Plat Review Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the re- subdivision of Lots 2 and 3, Bighorn Subdivision 4 Addition, located at 4316 and 4336 Streamside Circle West, and setting details in regards thereto. (PEC110063) Applicant: Diamond Assets, represented by Triumph Development Planner: Bill Gibson ACTION: Table to February 27, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0 5 minutes 4. A request for findings of fact and a determination of accuracy and completeness, pursuant to Chapter 12 -3, Administration and Enforcement, Vail Town Code, and Article 12 -713, Commercial Core 1 District, Vail Town Code, for applications for a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -713-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the addition of GRFA (Rucksack Building), located at 288 Bridge Street, Unit R -2/ Part of Lots C & D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110045); and a major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12 -713-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for additions of enclosed floor area; a variance, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, from Section 12- 14 -17, Setback from Watercourse, Vail Town Code, to allow for encroachments into the Mill Creek setback and a variance, pursuant to Chapter 12 -17, Variances, Vail Town Code, from Section 12- 713-15, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to allow for additions of enclosed floor area in excess of allowable site coverage, located at 288 Bridge Street, Unit R -1 (Rucksack Building)/ Part of Lots C & D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC110046, PEC110050) Appellant: Bridge Street Building, LLC Planner: Rachel Dimond ACTION: Table to February 27, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0 5. Approval of January 30, 2012 minutes MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0 6. Information Update Warren Campbell stated that there would be iPad training provided after the February 27 regular agenda was completed. 7. Adjournment MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6 -0 -0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479 -2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24 -hour notification. Please call (970) 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Pa gg 5 2/21 /2� 12 4 -1 -5 Community Development Department Published February 10, 2012, in the Vail Daily. Pa gge 6 2/21/212 4 -1 -6 TOWN OF VAIL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA PUBLIC MEETING February 15, 2012 Council Chambers 75 South Frontage Road West - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Tom DuBois Pete Dunning Brian Gillette Rollie Kjesbo (departed at 2pm) Libby Maio PROJECT ORIENTATION 1:30pm SITE VISITS 1. Vail Slopeside LLC — 446 Forest Road 2. Iceliux LLC — 2430 Chamonix Lane 3. Truscheit Residence — 4017 Lupine Drive MAIN AGENDA 3:00pm Iceliux LLC Residence DRB120009 / 15 minutes Rachel Final review of an addition (bedroom, entry) 2430 Chamonix Lane /Lot 12, Block b, Vail Das Schone Filing 1 Applicant: Iceliux LLC, represented by Kurt Segerberg ACTION: Approved MOTION: Gillette SECOND: Maio VOTE: 3 -0 -1 ( Kjesbo recused) CONDITION(S): 1. The applicant shall replace the proposed triple windows on the east elevation with narrower windows to match all other window widths on the east elevation. 2. Vail Slopeside LLC DRB120010 / 15 minutes Final review of new construction (single family residence) 446 Forest Road /Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 3 Applicant: Vail Slopeside LLC, represented by Tom Frye ACTION: Approved MOTION: Gillette SECOND: Maio VOTE: 3 -0 -0 3. Truscheit Residence DRB120011 / 15 minutes Final review of new construction (two - family residence) 4017 Lupine Drive /Lot 7, Bighorn Subdivision Applicant: Robert Truscheit, represented by Brennen Fitzgerald ACTION: Tabled to March 7, 2012 MOTION: Gillette SECOND: Maio VOTE: 3 -0 -0 STAFF APPROVALS Bishop Park Condominiums DRB110588 Final review of minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 63 Willow Place /Lot 1 & 2, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Bishop Park Condominium Association, represented by Kyle Webb Page 1 2/21/2012 Rachel Rachel 4 -2 -1 Cummings Residence DRB120004 Bill Final review of changes to approved plans (deck) 4936 Juniper Lane /Lot 6, Block 5, Bighorn Subdivision 5 th Addition Applicant: Greg and Janice Cummings Suszynski Residence DRB120015 Rachel Final review of changes to approved plans (railings) 1481 Aspen Grove Lane /Lot 1, Block 2, Lion's Ridge Filing 1 Applicant: Conrad Suszynski, represented by SRE Builders Phillips Residence DRB120016 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (gas piping) 1881 Lions Ridge Loop, Unit 33 /1-ot 1, Block 1, Lions Ridge Filing 3 Applicant: Brook Phillips Blue Jeans Bar DRB120019 Rachel Final review of sign application (business identification) 242 East Meadow Drive (Sonnenalp) /Lot B, Block 5, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Lady Fuller The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479 -2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479 -2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Page 2 2/21/2012 4 -2 -2 K � TOWN OF VA10 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: Discussion of 2012 Community Survey Questions. PRESENTER(S): Suzanne Silverthorn & Chris Cares ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide direction to staff on areas of focus for 2012 Community Survey. BACKGROUND: The Town of Vail community survey is used to probe public policy issues and solicit feedback on other topics of community interest. It is also used to measure the town's operational performance as compared with previous years. The most recent surveys were conducted in 2003, 2005 and 2010. A 2012 survey is planned to coincide with the new Town Council term and to benchmark municipal service levels. The purpose of the discussion is to develop a list of community issues and topics to be included in the survey and to finalize methodology and schedule. ATTACHMENTS: Council Memorandum 022112 TOV Survey 2012 TOV Survey 2010 2/21/2012 IN W VA I L ¢ To: Vail Town Council From: Suzanne Silverthorn, Community Information Date: February 21, 2012 Subject: Discussion of 2012 Community Survey Questions Memorandum I. BACKGROUND The Town of Vail community survey is used to probe public policy issues and solicit feedback on other topics of community interest. It is also used to measure the town's operational performance as compared with previous years. The most recent surveys were conducted in 2003, 2005 and 2010. A 2012 survey is planned to coincide with the new Town Council term and to benchmark municipal service levels. The purpose of the work session is to develop a list of community issues and topics to be included in the survey and to finalize methodology and schedule. Chris Cares of RRC Associates, the town's research contractor, will facilitate the discussion. II. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SURVEY QUESTIONS A working draft of the 2012 survey is included as an attachment. The questions shaded in blue are topics forwarded by the Town Council in 2010. While some of these questions are no longer pertinent, the Town Council may wish to retain selected questions to measure changes in community sentiment. In addition, there may be benefit in asking for feedback on the four goal areas identified recently by Town Council: 1) Improve Economic Vitality; 2) Grow a Balanced Community; 3) Improve the Quality of the Experience; and 4) Develop Future Leadership. Questions related to town service levels have been reviewed and updated by the staff and are included in the working draft. III. METHODOLOGY The proposed methodology for the 2012 survey would use two techniques: 1) an initial postcard mailing to households, business owners and part -time residents inviting recipients to enter a password to complete the survey on -line; and 2) promotion of an open invitation to complete the survey on -line without a password restriction. The two formats would be used to enhance participation, especially among subgroups of residents (such as the youth segment). The initial postcard invitation mailing would be based on a list of Vail households to be purchased from a third -party provider. In addition, paper copies of the survey would be available for distribution in Town of Vail buildings as a mail -back option. These methods were used in 2010 and resulted in 528 completed responses with a margin of error of about 5 percent. The proposed method would ensure comparability to past research and would represent an inclusive outreach to citizens with several different invitations to participate. The results provide an effective tool for understanding community sentiment. See results attached. IV. TIMELINE The proposed timeline for the 2012 survey project is as follows: 2/21/2012 5 -1 -I Feb. 21 Work Session Week of March 5 Week of March 26 April 2 -13 April 2 -13 April 16 June V. ATTACHMENT 2012 Draft Survey 2010 Survey Results Town of Vail Review of draft survey and discussion of community issues /topics by Town Council Finalization of survey Mailing to Vail households to invite participation (includes a sampling of second homeowners and business representatives) Promotion of survey to enlist participation by all interested parties Distribution of paper copies in municipal facilities for mail -back Last day for survey participation Presentation of report 2/21/2012 Page 2 5 -I -2 TOWN OF VAIL A Community Survey 2012 Draft 1 Town Council - Below is a copy of the 2010 Community Survey that is annotated for your review. The first 14 questions are shaded to call attention to our discussion on Feb. 21. Some of these shaded questions might be eliminated, changed or updated to address your assessment of current issues and priorities, while others are recommended to be retained to allow comparisons over time. The remainder of the survey measures service level benchmarks. While the benchmark questions can be edited, we are suggesting that the changes be kept to a minimum to insure comparability. I have made some notes concerning the shaded questions at various points in the survey. They are intended to offer you some perspective that might help in your review and discussion. Chris Cares, Research Contractor First, a few questions about the general state of Vail... Questions 1 and 2 have been asked in the same format since 2003. Q.1 is frequently used in polling, with wording identical to VaTs, to measure overall perceptions of direction. I encourage you to consider keeping these questions. Would you say that things in the Town of Vail are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? [ ] Right direction [ ] Wrong track [ ] Don't know In a few words, why do you feel that way? (Please attach an additional sheet of paper with your comments if needed on any survey question.) 2. Over the past two years has the sense of community within the Town improved, gotten worse or stayed the same? [ ] Improved [ ] Gotten worse [ ] Stayed the same [ ] Don't know /no opinion Do you have any comments or suggestions on your response? GUEST EXPERIENCE 3. What are one or two things the Town of Vail could do to improve the guest experience in Vail? This question was asked for the first time in 2010, a response to the Towns focus on guest experience. Note that guest relations are also measured in Q4(1) below. We gathered extensive feedback on this topic from the open ended responses in 2010 and it is likely that responses in 2012 to this open -ended question would be similar to those from 2010. You might consider modifying or deleting this question. 2/21/2012 5 -2 -1 COMMUNITY ISSUES 4. The Vail Town Council and staff have recently identified a number of topics to be addressed. For each area listed below, indicate the level of priority you believe is appropriate. (1 =Not a Priority, 3= Somewhat, 5 =High Priority) Tlus question was asked for the first time in 2010. It was based on some of the Council's areas of emphasis at that time. Recognizing that Council's focus has been reoriented to four goal areas you might want to consider modifying this question in various ways. PRIORITY PRIORITY DK 1. Guest relations and customer service 1 2 3 4 5 x 2. Economic vitality 1 2 3 4 5 x 3. Budget and capital management 1 2 3 4 5 x 4. Master planning (includes efforts to address development What one area is your highest priority? (Insert number from list # ) CONFERENCE CENTER FUNDS We anticipate removing Questions 5 and 6. 5. As you may be aware, $9.3 million was originally set aside for a town -owned conference center that was never built. The original objective of the conference center was to increase economic vitality and expand visitation to Vail. A ballot issue is required to determine use of these funds. The Vail Town Council has expressed a sense of urgency about determining the use of the available money. Which choice below best describes your suggestion for dealing with the opportunity these funds represent? [ ] Move as quickly as possible —a ballot issue on this topic is overdue [ ] Move at a moderate pace, taking time to study and evaluate the choices [ ] Move at a slow place —there is no hurry; having the money in hand preserves opportunities Do you have further comments on your response? 6. The Council has identified a range of choices for how the conference center fund money could be spent. Which choice best describes your preference? [ ] Use the money to build something (such as multipurpose facilities, expanded parking, etc.) [ ] Use the money for marketing or to support programs to enhance our economic condition [ ] Save the money for yet- undetermined needs [ ] Other: Do you have further comments on your response? 2/21/2012 2 5 -2 -2 and redevelopment throughout the town) 1 2 3 4 5 5. Transportation needs (bus service – local and regional) 1 2 3 4 5 6. Parking 1 2 3 4 5 7. Workforce housing (e.g., redevelopment of Timber Ridge) 1 2 3 4 5 8. Environmental sustainability (waste and energy conservation programs, environmental education, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 9. Use of the Conference Center Funds ($9.3 million) that the Town has available 1 2 3 4 5 10. Actions to improve Vail's appeal as a well- rounded community (a great place to live, work and play) 1 2 3 4 5 11. Planning for West Vail commercial redevelopment opportunities 1 2 3 4 5 Do you have any comments on these issues or the general direction of the Town? What one area is your highest priority? (Insert number from list # ) CONFERENCE CENTER FUNDS We anticipate removing Questions 5 and 6. 5. As you may be aware, $9.3 million was originally set aside for a town -owned conference center that was never built. The original objective of the conference center was to increase economic vitality and expand visitation to Vail. A ballot issue is required to determine use of these funds. The Vail Town Council has expressed a sense of urgency about determining the use of the available money. Which choice below best describes your suggestion for dealing with the opportunity these funds represent? [ ] Move as quickly as possible —a ballot issue on this topic is overdue [ ] Move at a moderate pace, taking time to study and evaluate the choices [ ] Move at a slow place —there is no hurry; having the money in hand preserves opportunities Do you have further comments on your response? 6. The Council has identified a range of choices for how the conference center fund money could be spent. Which choice best describes your preference? [ ] Use the money to build something (such as multipurpose facilities, expanded parking, etc.) [ ] Use the money for marketing or to support programs to enhance our economic condition [ ] Save the money for yet- undetermined needs [ ] Other: Do you have further comments on your response? 2/21/2012 2 5 -2 -2 FEES AND TAXES 7. Which statement below best describes your opinion about the relationship between taxes /fees and the services that are provided by the Town of Vail? [ ] I am satisfied with the current level of taxes and services [ ] I am willing to pay more taxes to get more services [ ] I feel that I pay too much for the services I receive [ ] I am willing to accept service reductions if it means lower taxes [ ] Other: [ ] I have no opinion Questions 7, 8 and 9 were asked for the first time in 2010. There could be a benefit in continuing these questions in 2012 (particularly 7 and 8) to measure changes in opinion. Alternatively, the Council might want to consider other questions on Fees and Taxes that would provide direction from the community. Q9, if it is kept, should be modified to current circumstances. 8. From the list below, are there specific revenue sources you would prioritize as potential sources of increased revenues? (Check all that apply) [ ] Construction permit and development review fees [ ] Construction use tax [ ] Less free parking (in summer, "free after 3:00," etc.) [ ] Lift ticket tax [ ] Liquor /cigarette tax [ ] Lodging tax [ ] Parking - daily fees [ ] Parking — season passes [ ] Property tax [ ] Real estate transfer tax [ ] Sales tax [ ] None of the above Do you have further comments on your response? 9. In 2009, the Town of Vail cut $2.9 million in operating expenditures to include 12 fewer full -time equivalent positions. A stated goal was that there would be no noticeable impact on services. In reality, how do you compare current service levels versus prior years? [ ] No change [ ] Slight improvement [ ] Large improvement [ ] Slight decline [ ] Large decline Do you have further comments on your response? PARKING Questions 10 tluough 12 address parking preferences and behavior. In light of continued interest in these topics we suggest that some questions be dedicated to parking. Asking them again would allow changes to be measured over time. Alternatively, are these the most helpful questions or are there other topics related to parking and transportation that should be probed with this 2012 survey? 10. When you visit Vail Vill age/Lions head, what is your first choice for parking for the following purposes? Shopping Skiing Work Lionshead Parking Structure [ ] [ ] [ ] Vail Village Parking Structure [ ] [ ] [ ] Cascade Area [ ] [ ] [ ] North Frontage Road in West Vail (Safeway area) [ ] [ ] [ ] Donovan Park [ ] [ ] [ ] Other: [ ] [ ] [ ] 2/21/2012 5 -2 -3 11. Why do you prefer that location for skiing [ ] Variety of shops and restaurants [ ] Overall experience [ ] Ski lockers [ ] Shorter walking distance [ ] Gets to parts of the mountain I prefer to ski [ ] Other: 12. Would you support charging a fee for parking in public lots in Vail during the summer months for the purpose of providing more parking opportunities? [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Uncertain The following question was asked for the first time in 2010. It did not include Gore Creek water quality. Is there a desire to keep this bank of questions as is (permitting comparison) or modifying the questions to further address current environmental policies and actions? Id a19 Please rate the amount of emphasis that is beina placed on the followina in Vail. Use a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 mean: "Much Too Little Emphasis" and 5 means "Far Too Much Emphasis." MUCH T00 1 2 ABOUT 4 FAR T00 Are there: [ ] too few events [ ] about the right number [ ] too many events LITTLE RIGHT Quality of event venues MUCH DK Overall attention to the threat of wildfire from beetle - killed trees Ford Park Fields 1 2 3 4 through forest management such as cutting and Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater 1 2 3 4 5 x removing trees, and forest regeneration 1 2 3 4 5 x Enforcement of the dead tree removal ordinance to address the 3 4 5 x Dobson Arena 1 2 beetle infestation 1 2 3 4 5 x Addressing environmental quality in the Town of Vail between Lionshead, Vail Village and (air, water, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 X Gore Creek water quality 1 2 3 4 5 x This is a series of new questions addressing Events that has come out of discussions with staff. Does Council want to add these or similar questions on events and related impacts? Are there other aspects of events that you might want to further evaluated? new Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of town -wide special events (races, concerts, festivals, etc.). NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Quality of events 1 2 3 4 5 x Are there: [ ] too few events [ ] about the right number [ ] too many events Quality of event venues Ford Park Fields 1 2 3 4 5 x Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater 1 2 3 4 5 x Vail Village 1 2 3 4 5 x Lionshead 1 2 3 4 5 x Dobson Arena 1 2 3 4 5 x Frontage Road express bus to transport event -goers between Lionshead, Vail Village and Ford Park in the summer 1 2 3 4 5 x Ease of access to event venues 1 2 3 4 5 x How do you access events? [ ] Public transportation [ ] Walking or cycling [ ] Driving Parking availability during special events 1 2 3 4 5 x Restroom availability and quality at special events 1 2 3 4 5 x 2/21/2012 4 5 -2 -4 Use and placement of directional signs 13. Do you own a parking pass or value card this season? 1 2 3 4 5 [ ]No (GO TOQ.15) [ ] Yes: [ ] Gold pass [ ] Blue pass [ ] Green pass [ ] Pink pass [ ] Value pass x 14. How satisfied are you with the benefits of your pass this year? NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Any comments on your response? 15. Please rate your satisfaction with public parking services in Vail. NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Overall parking fees /pricing structure 1 2 3 4 5 x Booth attendant courtesy 1 2 3 4 5 x Parking structure cleanliness 1 2 3 4 5 x Parking availability during winter periods 1 2 3 4 5 x Parking availability during summer periods 1 2 3 4 5 x Parking availability during Ford Park events 1 2 3 4 5 x The Community Development Department provides planning, design review, environmental programs, and building and restaurant inspection services. 16. Have you used the services of the Community Development Department within the past 12 months? [ ] Yes [ ] No 17. (IF YES) How did you access their services? (Check all that apply) [ ] Website [ ] Telephone [ ] Walk in to office [ ] Attend a meeting [ ] Other: 18. Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of the Community Development Department. NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Availability of information (e.g., public records) 1 2 3 4 5 x Overall service and efficiency 1 2 3 4 5 x Timeliness of response (to telephone calls, inspections, questions /inquiries, plan review, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 x Building permit review and inspections 1 2 3 4 5 x Courtesy and attitude /helpfulness 1 2 3 4 5 x Knowledge /ability to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x 2/21/2012 5 5 -2 -5 The Public Works Department provides maintenance of public areas including parks, buildings, roads and village areas. 19. Rate your satisfaction with Public Works services in the Town of Vail: NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Snow removal on roads 1 2 3 4 5 x Road and street maintenance by the Town of Vail (potholes, sweeping, drainage, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 x Overall park maintenance 1 2 3 4 5 x Appearance and condition of town -owned buildings 1 2 3 4 5 x Friendliness and courteous attitude of Public Works employees 1 2 3 4 5 x Cleanliness of pedestrian villages 1 2 3 4 5 x Cleanliness of public restrooms 1 2 3 4 5 x 20. Have you utilized Vail Fire for any service, inspection or 9 -1 -1 emergency within the past 12 months? [ ] Yes [ ] No 21. Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of Fire Services in the Town of Vail. NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Response times to basic medical emergencies and fires 1 2 3 4 5 x Courtesy and helpfulness of firefighters and fire prevention staff 1 2 3 4 5 x Timely plan -check and fire inspection systems on remodeled or new construction 1 2 3 4 5 x Fire safety, awareness and education programs provided 1 2 3 4 5 x 22. Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of Police Services in the Town of Vail. NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Overall feeling of safety and security 1 2 3 4 5 x Appropriate presence of police on foot/vehicle oatrol 1 2 3 4 5 x Friendliness and approachability of Vail police department employees 1 2 3 4 5 x Overall quality of service 1 2 3 4 5 x Crime prevention 1 2 3 4 5 x Managing parking and traffic control issues 1 2 3 4 5 x Any comments on your responses? 23. How many times per month do you use TOV bus service? times per month in winter in summer Are there any specific concerns or considerations that reduce your use of bus services? 2/21/2012 h 5 -2 -6 24. Please rate your satisfaction with bus service. Frequency of In -town shuttle Frequency of outlying service Bus driver courtesy Dependability of bus service Cleanliness of buses Level of crowding on buses Late night bus service —Town of Vail Late night bus service —ECO Regional Transit NOT AT ALL NOT AT ALL VERY VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED SATISFIED DK 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x 1 2 3 4 5 x The Vail Public Library offers access to information resources of many types to serve the needs of Vail's guests, residents, businesses and schools. 25. Do you hold a library card in the Town of Vail? [ ] Yes [ ] No 26. What typically brings you to the library? (Check the two most important categories) [ ] Materials (books, magazines, audio CDs, DVDs) [ ] Computers [ ] Wireless access [ ] Children's story hours /programs [ ] Programs for adults /families 27. How frequently do you use the library? times per month 28. What do you like best about your experiences at the library? 29. Please rate your satisfaction with the following: 2/21/2012 7 5 -2 -7 NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK Library collection (including magazines, books, audio and visual media) 1 2 3 4 5 x Library Story Hour 1 2 3 4 5 x Summer Reading Program 1 2 3 4 5 x Databases 1 2 3 4 5 x Friendliness /courtesy of library staff 1 2 3 4 5 x Library newsletter 1 2 3 4 5 x Library website 1 2 3 4 5 x SOURCES OF LOCAL INFORMATION 30. How do you receive information about the Town of Vail that may be of interest to you? (Check all that apply) PLEASE LIST SPECIFIC SOURCES FOR EACH [ ] Online [ ] Print [ ] Radio [ ] Television [ ] Other 2/21/2012 7 5 -2 -7 31 Do you subscribe to e- services provided by the Town of Vail? [ ] No (GO TO Q. 33) [ ] Yes (which ones ?) [ ] Special event info [ ] News releases I 1 Sales tax info Library updates Art in Public Places Community Development Department updates Meeting agendas Twitter Other 32. How satisfied are you with the e- services provided by the town of Vail? NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED DK 33. Do you use any social media on a regular basis? (Check all that apply) 11 Facebook Linkedln Twitter MySpace YouTube Flickr Other Please provide the following demographic information. Please remember that all responses remain strictly confidential and are reported only in group format. 34. What is the ZIP code of your primary residence? 35. Which of the following best describes you? [ ] Year -round resident (11+ months /year) [ ] Part -time resident [ ] Employed in the town of Vail but don't live there [ ] Get mail in the town but don't live or work there [ ] Non - resident owner of business /commercial property 36. Which of the following best describes your employment status? [ ] Work 8 months or more a year in the local area (Vail Valley, Summit County, etc.) [ ] Work 7 or fewer months a year in the local area (Vail Valley, Summit County, etc.) [ ] Currently employed outside of the local area (work on Front Range, out of state, etc.) [ ] Not employed: retired [ ] Not employed: unemployed and /or looking for work [ ] Not employed: homemaker [ ] Other: 2/21/2012 5 -2 -8 37. Is your residence (either year -round or seasonal) within the Town of Vail? [ ] Yes [ ] No If yes, where? [ ] East Vail [ ] Booth Falls and Bald Mountain Road areas [ ] Booth Creek/Aspen Lane [ ] Golf Course [ ] Vail Village [ ] Lionshead [ ] Potato Patch, Sandstone 38. Do you own or rent your residence? Buffehr Creek, Lionsridge, the Valley Vail Commons /Safeway area West Vail (north of 1 -70) Matterhorn, Glen Lyon Intermountain Not a resident of the Town of Vail Other [ ] Own [ ] Rent (Would you consider purchasing a deed - restricted home in the Town of Vail? [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Uncertain) [ ] Other (specify) 39. In an effort to help us understand local phone usage, which best describes your access to telephone services at your residence [ ] I have only a cell phone [ ] I have only a land line [ ] I have both a cell phone and a land line 40. How long have you lived within the Town of Vail (or owned property if a non - resident)? [ ] Less than 1 year [ ] 1 -5 years [ ] 6 -15 years [ ] More than 15 years [ ] Not applicable 41. (IF RESIDENT) Do you own or operate a business within the Town of Vail? [ ] Yes [ ] No 42. Are you a registered voter in Vail? [ ] Yes [ ] No 43. Which of these categories best describes your household status? [ ] Single, no children [ ] Couple, no children [ ] Household with children living at home [ ] Empty- nester, children no longer at home 44. Are you: [ ] Male [ ] Female 45. In what year were you born? THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION IN OUR CONTINUING EVALUATION PROGRAM. 2/21/2012 9 5 -2 -9 T0WN0FVK = Convnitnity Survey 2010 SUMMARY OF RESULTS First, a few questions about the general state of Vail... Would you say that things in the Town of Vail are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? 2007 2005 2003 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =) (n =397) (n =404) (n =400) 58% 58% 70% 57% Right direction 28 30 19 28 Wrong track 14 12 10 15 Don't know In a few words, why do you feel that way? (Please attach an additional sheet of paper with your comments if needed on any survey question.) 2. Over the past two years has the sense of community within the Town improved, gotten worse or stayed the same? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =369) (n =400) (n =404) (n =395) 9% 14% 17% 16% Improved 26 36 21 31 Gotten worse 54 45 53 46 Stayed the same 11 5 8 8 Don't know /no opinion Do you have any comments or suggestions on your response? GUEST EXPERIENCE 3. What are one or two things the Town of Vail could do to improve the guest experience in Vail? 2/21/2012 5 -3 -I COMMUNITY ISSUES 4. The Vail Town Council and staff have recently identified a number of topics to be addressed. For each area listed below, indicate the level of priority you believe is appropriate. (I =Not a Priority, 3= Somewhat, 5 =High Priority) Community Issues 87% Economic vitality (4.41) 2% 86% Budget and capital management (4.36) 1% Parking (4.46) 8q 7% 80% Guest relations and customer service (4.27) 4% Master planning (includes efforts to address development and 75% redevelopment throughout the Town) (4.1) 61� 75 Transportation needs (bus service -local and regional) (4.11) 6 0$ Actions to improve Vail's appeal as a well- rounded community (a great 71% place to live, work and play) (3.99) 12 %', 55Q/o Workforce housing (e.g., redevelopment ofbmber ridge) (3.61) 15b/o Environmental sustainability (waste and energy conservation programs, 51% environmental education, etc.) (3.51) 18% Use of the conference center funds ($9.3 million) that the Town has F D Not at a Priority (1 and 2) 8% available (3.41) 21% High Priority (4 and 5) Planning for West Vail redevelopment opportunities (3.09) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" Do you have any comments on these issues or the general direction of the Town? 2/21/2012 2 5 -3 -2 What one area is your highest priority? Parking Economic vitality Actions to improve Vail's appeal as a well- rounded community Master planning (includes development and redevelopment) Budgetand capital management Guest relations and customer service Environmental sustainability (environmental education, etc.) Transportation needs (bus service -local and regional) Use of the conference center funds the town has available Planning for West Vail redevelopment opportunities Workforce housing (e.g., redevelopment of Timber Ridge) Percent Responding CONFERENCE CENTER FUNDS 5. As you may be aware, $9.3 million was originally set aside for a town -owned conference center that was never built. The original objective of the conference center was to increase economic vitality and expand visitation to Vail. A ballot issue is required to determine use of these funds. The Vail Town Council has expressed a sense of urgency about determining the use of the available money. Which choice below best describes your suggestion for dealing with the opportunity these funds represent? n =364 18% Move as quickly as possible —a ballot issue on this topic is overdue 50 Move at a moderate pace, taking time to study and evaluate the choices 32 Move at a slow place —there is no hurry; having the money in hand preserves opportunities Do you have further comments on your response? 6. The Council has identified a range of choices for how the conference center fund money could be spent. Which choice best describes your preference? n =352 53% Use the money to build something (such as multipurpose facilities, expanded parking, etc.) 4 Use the money for marketing or to support programs to enhance our economic condition 29 Save the money for yet- undetermined needs 14 Other: Do you have further comments on your response? 2/21/2012 5 -3 -3 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% FEES AND TAXES 7. Which statement below best describes your opinion about the relationship between taxes /fees and the services that are provided by the Town of Vail? n =365 56% 1 am satisfied with the current level of taxes and services 6 1 am willing to pay more taxes to get more services 18 1 feel that I pay too much for the services I receive 10 1 am willing to accept service reductions if it means lower taxes 2 Other: 8 1 have no opinion 8. From the list below, are there specific revenue sources you would prioritize as potential sources of increased revenues? (Check all that apply) n =295 37 Construction permit and development review fees 7 Parking - daily fees 32 Construction use tax 8 Parking — season passes 6 Less free parking (in summer, "free after 3:00," etc.) 12 Property tax 19 Lift ticket tax 18 Real estate transfer tax 43 Liquor /cigarette tax 14 Sales tax 26 Lodging tax 20 None of the above Do you have further comments on your response? 9. In 2009, the Town of Vail cut $2.9 million in operating expenditures to include 12 fewer full -time equivalent positions. A stated goal was that there would be no noticeable impact on services. In reality, how do you compare current service levels versus prior years? n =348 76% No change 3 Slight improvement 1 Large improvement 18 Slight decline 1 Large decline Do you have further comments on your response? PARKING 10. When you visit Vail Village /Lionshead, what is your first choice for parking for the following purposes? 11. Why do you prefer that location for skiing n =305 5% Variety of shops and restaurants 13 Overall experience 10 Ski lockers 23 Shorter walking distance 28 Gets to parts of the mountain I prefer to ski 21 Other: 12. Would you support charging a fee for parking in public lots in Vail during the summer months for the purpose of providing more parking opportunities? n =367 15% Yes 72 No 13 Uncertain 2/21/2012 4 5 -3 -4 Shopping n =279 Skiing n =391 Work n =115 Lionshead Parking Structure 18% 21 19 Vail Village Parking Structure 64 48 44 Cascade Area 1 7 6 North Frontage Road in West Vail (Safeway area) 8 3 2 Donovan Park -- 2 2 Other: 9 19 27 11. Why do you prefer that location for skiing n =305 5% Variety of shops and restaurants 13 Overall experience 10 Ski lockers 23 Shorter walking distance 28 Gets to parts of the mountain I prefer to ski 21 Other: 12. Would you support charging a fee for parking in public lots in Vail during the summer months for the purpose of providing more parking opportunities? n =367 15% Yes 72 No 13 Uncertain 2/21/2012 4 5 -3 -4 13. Do you own a parking pass or value card this season? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =367) (n =399) (n =404) 74% 73% 72% 71% No 26 27 28 29 Yes (IF YES) Which one? 2010 2007 2005 (n =91) (n =101) (n =128) 10% 11% 6% 17 17 12 4 3 4 2003 1% 3 2 7 7 3 2 62 62 70 18 -- 5 -- Gold pass Blue pass Green pass Pink pass Value card Don't know 14. How satisfied are you with the benefits of your pass this year? NOT AT ALL VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED mean n= 9% 16 24 21 30 3.5 Any comments on your response? 2/21/2012 5 5 -3 -5 15. Please rate your satisfaction with public parking services in Vail. Public Parking Services Summer Pkg Availability Booth Attendant Courtesy Pkg Structure Cleanliness Parking availability during Ford Park events Winter Pkg Availability Pkg Fees/ Pricing Structure The Community Development Department provides planning, design review, environmental programs, and building and restaurant inspection services. 16. Have you used the services of the Community Development Department within the past 12 months? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =369) (n =388) (n =404) (n =401) 23% 26% 26 22 Yes 77% 74 73 77 No 17. (IF YES) How did you access their services? (Check all that apply) n =70 25% Website 45 Telephone 72 Walk in to office 19 Attend a meeting 9 Other: 2/21/2012 6 5 -3 -( 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 18. Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of the Community Development Department. Community Development Dept. Knowledge /ability to answer questions Courtesy & Attitude Availability of information Overall Service & Efficiency Building Permit Review & Inspections 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 19. Please rate the amount of emphasis that is being placed on the following in Vail. Use a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means "Much Too Little Emphasis" and 5 means "Far Too Much Emphasis." MUCHT00 ABOUT FART00 LITTLE RIGHT MUCH mean n= Overall attention to the threat of wildfire from beetle - killed trees through forest management such as cutting and removing trees, and forest regeneration 10% 23 58 Enforcement of the dead tree removal ordinance to address the beetle infestation 12% 24 56 Addressing environmental quality in the Town of Vail (air, water, etc.) 6% 23 55 2/21/2012 5 -3 -7 6 2 67% 329 6 66% 2.6 55% 12 4 2.9 63% 63% 57% 55% 46% 2010 47% 02007 47p/° 02005 2 % 02003 31% 40% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 19. Please rate the amount of emphasis that is being placed on the following in Vail. Use a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means "Much Too Little Emphasis" and 5 means "Far Too Much Emphasis." MUCHT00 ABOUT FART00 LITTLE RIGHT MUCH mean n= Overall attention to the threat of wildfire from beetle - killed trees through forest management such as cutting and removing trees, and forest regeneration 10% 23 58 Enforcement of the dead tree removal ordinance to address the beetle infestation 12% 24 56 Addressing environmental quality in the Town of Vail (air, water, etc.) 6% 23 55 2/21/2012 5 -3 -7 6 2 2.7 329 6 2 2.6 305 12 4 2.9 327 7 The Public Works Department provides maintenance of public areas including parks, buildings, roads and village areas. 20. Rate your satisfaction with Public Works services in the Town of Vail: Public Works Dept. Cleanliness Of Ped. Villages Park Maintenance Snow Removal On Roads Friendliness & Courtesy Of Public Works Emps T.O.V. Road /St. Maintenance Cleanliness Of Public Restrooms Appearance & Condition Of Town -Owned Bldgs 7 90% °I 84 %', /° 8�% 86¢/° 90% 86¢/° 0% 88% 91% " 2010 80% 2005 81% (n =363) 0% 75% (n =401) 73% 22% 73% 13 Yes 74 %', 78 81 85 No 73% ° 2010 02007 02005 ° 02003 09% 6 7% 2/21/2012 8 5 -3 -8 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 21. Have you utilized Vail Fire for any service, inspection or 9 -1 -1 emergency within the past 12 months? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =363) (n =395) (n =404) (n =401) 13% 22% 18 13 Yes 87 78 81 85 No 2/21/2012 8 5 -3 -8 22. Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of Fire Services in the Town of Vail. Fire Services Courtesy & Helpfulness Of Firefighters Response Time to Basic Medical Emergencies & Fires Timely Plan -Check & Fire Inspection Systems Fire Safety, Awareness & Eduction Programs 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 2/21/2012 9 5 -3 -9 92% 88% 93% $8% 86% 85 90% $9% I 71% 618% 62% 2010 C] 2007 64% a 2005 64% a 2003 66% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 2/21/2012 9 5 -3 -9 23. Please rate your satisfaction with the following aspects of Police Services in the Town of Vail. Police Services Feeling Of Safety & Security Quality Of Service Friendliness & Approachability Of Vail Police Dept Emps Visibility Of Police Patrol Crime prevention Appropriate presence of police on foot/vehicle patrol Managing parking and traffic control issues 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 7 /o 87,% $9% 7 o 173% 79% 75 °f° % 74 % 81% 71% ° 1 67% 71% 08% M 2010 p 2007 58% p 2005 p 2003 I I I I I I I I Any comments on your responses? 24. How many times per month do you use TOV bus service? 14.9 times per month in winter 7.4 in summer n =341 n =315 Are there any specific concerns or considerations that reduce your use of bus services? 2/21/2012 10 5 -3 -10 25. Please rate your satisfaction with bus service. Bus Service Dependability Of Bus Service Freq. Of In -Town Shuttle Cleanliness Of Buses Bus Driver Courtesy Freq. Of Outlying Service Late Night Bus Service - TOV Crowding On Buses Late Night Bus Service - ECO Reg Trans 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" The Vail Public Library offers access to information resources of many types to serve the needs of Vail's guests, residents, businesses and schools. 26. Do you hold a library card in the Town of Vail? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =367) (n =398) (n =404) (n =401) 62% 63% 65% 60% Yes 38 37 35 39 No 27. What typically brings you to the library? (check the two most important categories) n =206 89% Materials (books, magazines, audio CDs, DVDs) 14 Computers 12 Wireless access 18 Children's story hours /programs 15 Programs for adults /families 28. How frequently do you use the library? 2.4 times per month. n =291 (28% say "none ") 2/21/2012 11 5 -3 - 11 87% 89% 91% 83% 86% 81, 0% 83% 2% 81% 83% 86% 85% 656 11 1 1 1 ° 51% 73% 47% 50% 2010 69% M 2007 29% 2005 p 2003 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" The Vail Public Library offers access to information resources of many types to serve the needs of Vail's guests, residents, businesses and schools. 26. Do you hold a library card in the Town of Vail? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =367) (n =398) (n =404) (n =401) 62% 63% 65% 60% Yes 38 37 35 39 No 27. What typically brings you to the library? (check the two most important categories) n =206 89% Materials (books, magazines, audio CDs, DVDs) 14 Computers 12 Wireless access 18 Children's story hours /programs 15 Programs for adults /families 28. How frequently do you use the library? 2.4 times per month. n =291 (28% say "none ") 2/21/2012 11 5 -3 - 11 29. What do you like best about your experiences at the library? 30. Please rate your satisfaction with the following: Friendliness/ Courtesy Of Library Staff Databases Library Story Hour Library Collection (Mags, Books, Audio & Visual Media) Summer Reading Program Library website Library newsletter Library 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding "4" or "5" 85 M"T776% 81 % 80% 85% 2 0 /6 1 717% I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 75% 2010 67% 2007 2005 SOURCES OF LOCAL INFORMATION 31. How do you receive information about the Town of Vail that may be of interest to you? (Check all that apply) n =302 65% Newspaper 95 Vail Daily 49 Vail Mountaineer 2 Other 32 Local radio 27 Local television 15 Channe15 37 TV 8 15 Plum 1 Other 13 1 subscribe to the broadcast email system from the Town of Vail 34 Town of Vail Website www.vailgov.com 5 Other 2/21/2012 12 5 -3 -12 32. Do you use any social media on a regular basis? (check all that apply) n =130 85% Facebook 27 Linkedln 6 Twitter 1 MySpace 16 YouTube 1 Flickr 6 Other Please provide the following demographic information. Please remember that all responses remain strictly confidential and are reported only in group format. 33. What is the ZIP code of your primary residence? 34. Which of the following best describes you? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =394) (n =404) (n =401) 4% 4% 5% 5% 63 58 63 57 27 38 31 37 6 -- -- -- Non - resident owner of business /commercial property Year -round resident (12 months /year) Part -time resident Employed in town /get mail there 35. Which of the following best describes your employment status? n =366 53% Work 8 months or more a year in the local area (Vail Valley, Summit County, etc.) 4 Work 7 or fewer months a year in the local area (Vail Valley, Summit County, etc.) 19 Currently employed outside of the local area (work on Front Range, out of state, etc.) 15 Not employed: retired 2 Not employed: unemployed and /or looking for work 3 Not employed: homemaker 4 Other: 36. Is your residence (either year -round or part -time) within the Town of Vail? 78% Yes 22% No If yes, where? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =288) (n =396) (n =404) (n =401) 25% 27% 27% 30% East Vail 3 2 2 1 Booth Falls and Bald Mountain Road areas - 1 1 1 Booth Creek/Aspen Lane 3 3 3 4 Golf Course 8 9 8 8 Vail Village 4 8 7 8 Lionshead 12 10 11 9 Potato Patch, Sandstone 8 2 4 2 Buffehr Creek, Lionsridge, the Valley 4 2 1 1 Vail Commons /Safeway area 17 24 23 23 West Vail (north of 1 -70) 4 3 2 4 Matterhorn, Glen Lyon 9 3 5 3 Intermountain 1 -- 1 Located just outside Town of Vail 4 6 3 4 Other 2/21/2012 13 5 -3 -13 37. Do you own or rent your residence? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =370) (n =395) (n =404) (n =401) 86% 93% 84% 78% Own 13 7 14 20 Rent 1 1 1 'V1 Other (specify) 38. In an effort to help us understand local phone usage, which best describes your access to telephone services at your residence 23 21 2010 2007 26 (n =370) (n =394) 6 -15 years 32% 2% 1 have only a cell phone 3 8 1 have only a land line 66 89 1 have both a cell phone and a land line 39. How long have you lived within the Town of Vail (or owned property if a non - resident)? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =366) (n =342) (n =398) (n =404) (n =401) 21% 2% 3% 4% 6% Less than 1 year 15 14 23 21 1 -5 years 34 26 30 33 6 -15 years 49 56 42 39 More than 15 years 40. (IF RESIDENT) Do you own or operate a business within the Town of Vail? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =366) (n =380) (n =377) (n =377) 15% 21% 20% 19% Yes 85 79 80 81 No 41. Are you a registered voter in Vail? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =365) (n =393) (n =404) (n =401) 53% 55% 57% 51 Yes 47 45 41 48 No 42. Which of these categories best describes your household status? 2010 2007 2005 2003 (n =369) (n =393) (n =404) (n =401) 25% 24% 25% 31% Single, no children 26 17 20 16 Couple, no children 23 23 22 20 Household with children 27 37 32 31 Empty- nester, children no longer at home 43. Are you: 2010 2007 2005 (n =362) (n =400) (n =404) 54% 67% 52% Male 46 43 48 Female 44. What year were you born? average age =52.7, n =359 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION IN OUR CONTINUING EVALUATION PROGRAM. 2/21/2012 14 5 -3- 14 K � TOWN OF VAI!% VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: Information Updates and Attachments: 1) VEAC Minutes from February 14, 2012 - Kelli McDonald 2) December 2011 All Store Same Store Sales Report - Kelli McDonald 3) AIPP Board member number and term revisions consideration - Molly Eppard 4) Vail Valley Athlete Commission: The Commission convened February 14 to award grants to qualified local winter athletes. The Commission is composed of three members: Vail Valley Foundation ($10,000), Vail Resorts ($10,000) and the Town of Vail ($6,000). It was jointly decided to set aside a greater amount for summer athletes than in the past, based on the growing number of summer sports and participants. Those awarded grant money: Kathlyn Samuelson - Alpine Ski Racing: $1,500 (pending) Lucas Evans - Freestyle Skiing (Slopestyle /Big Air): $2,000 Dylan Bidez - Snowboarding: $2,000 (pending) Heidi Kloser - Mogul Skiing: $4,000 Sylvan Ellefson - Cross Country Skiing: $4,000 Taylor Seaton - Skiing Halfpipe: $2,000 Katharine Irwin - Alpine Skiing: $1,500 PRESENTER(S): Various ATTACHMENTS: VEAC February minutes Vail All Store Same Store AIPP Board Review Memorandum 2/21/2012 Vail Economic Advisory Council (VEAC) February 14, 2012 MEETING NOTES • VEAC Members Present: Rayla Kundolf; Rob LeVine; Pam Stenmark; Kim Newbury; Greg Moffett Laurie Mullen; Matt Morgan;; Brett Schoenfield; Andy Daly; Mark Gordon; Jamie Gunion (for Mike Ortiz); Kristin Williams (for Chris Jarnot); Michael Kurz • Others Present: Mark Woodberry; Constance Woodberry; Doe Browning; Pat Peeples; Robin Litt; Dick Cleveland; Carl Colby • TOV Staff Present: Town Manager Stan Zemler; Economic Development Manager Kelli McDonald; Public Works Director Greg Hall; Commission on Special Events Coordinator Sybill Navas; Capital Projects Manager Todd Oppenheimer; Executive Assistant Tammy Nagel • Update on Conference Center Funds Projects: Greg Hall, Public Works Director, gave a brief update on the golf course clubhouse /pavilion. Hall stated the design teams are under contract and construction will begin in 2013 with a soft opening in the spring of 2014. The clubhouse /pavilion will have views of the Gore Range Mountain with an inside and outside capacity of 400 -425. There is currently only one kitchen planned for the clubhouse restaurant but this kitchen will also be utilized by outside caterers for events in the pavilion. Hall did go onto say a second kitchen is being discussed, similar to a caterer's kitchen, - for the pavilion depending on the type of liquor license the premise will have. Todd Oppenheimer, Town of Vail Capital Projects Manager, presented a PowerPoint of the Ford Park improvements. There will be three full size softball fields, end to end soccer fields, new restrooms, concession stand near the east field and a maintenance facility near the west field. An overlook, walk and stair connection to the lower bench area of Ford Park is also part of the park's improvements. The Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater will have proposed improvements such as additional lawn, stadium like, seating, improved plaza entry and restrooms. Oppenheimer stated the truck turnaround at the amphitheater will also be improved to allow semi trucks making a delivery to do a 3 -point turnaround with the hopes to limit vehicle activity in Ford Park. Oppenheimer shared with the committee the proposed improvements to the Betty Ford Gardens such as expansion of the gardens to showcase AIPP art exhibits, improved restrooms, a - covered outdoor terrace, a welcome center, a Ford tribute and an overall enhancement of the landscape and pedestrian environment along Betty Ford Way. The grade of the stream walkway will be reduced, the parking area for the park will have an additional 32 spaces, the bus drop -off and all park entries will also be improved. Newbury reminded the committee that Ford Park is a park and if you add more buildings it will take away the "park feeling ". Mullen asked if the golf clubhouse & pavilion will have a liquor license or if it would be run like the Donovan Pavilion and give the event an option to bring in a caterer and liquor. Gunion stated the Vail Recreation Department is currently looking at the liquor options and what license would be a good fit. Navas expressed concern about the sporting fields being licensed and how that would affect nonprofits and sporting tournaments having special events in that area. Gordon inquired if there would be events such as concerts held on the fields. Zemler said it would be difficult to have events like a concert on the fields due to the damage to the turf and irrigation system from a large crowd. The replacement of the turf and irrigation system would be expensive. Zemler went on to say even if the fields had artificial turf (which is 2/21/2012 6 -1 -I not proposed) he felt the Town and the VRD would even be more protective of the fields due to the overall cost of replacement of the turf due to cigarette burns, gum etc. . Vail Global Energy Forum Update: Carl Colby spoke to the committee regarding the upcoming Vail Global Energy Forum being held at the Vilar Performing Arts Center in Beaver Creek on March 3 -4, 2012. The event is to examine the combined challenges of energy supply, energy security and the impacts of energy use that will shape the energy transitions underway now and in the decades to come. Colby informed the committee that there will be several distinguished speakers from Stanford University, MIT and Caltech, and the keynote speaker is the Colorado Governor, John Hickenlooper. The event is open to the public. Tickets are $100 for general admission and $175 for a "Signature Package," which includes reserved seating, pre and post event receptions on Saturday, as well as continental breakfast on Sunday. • Financial Reports: The financial reports were provided in the committees' packets. Event Metrics Report: McDonald explained to the committee how events that receive $10,000.00 and up are strongly encouraged to preform an independent survey of guests attending the event. The survey should provide information such as, how many attendees were at the event, an estimated spending of the guests, estimated room nights, overall satisfaction of the event and would the event attendees return to Vail. McDonald stated the Town Council requested intercept- studies to be paid for by VLMD and conducted on certain events occurring in the summer of 2011 to obtain consistent data on 10 -12 events. Navas said it was hard for an event producer to provide exact numbers of attendees and over night stays if there is more than one event happening that same day because an attendee will be counted for multiple events. Moffet stated the numbers of the projected revenue is not real and suggested the CSE take over conducting the surveys and hire high school students to assist with getting better data. Cleveland said anyone who attends the special events can see what events are good for town — you can just see it. Kurz thought Navas, the CSE board members, McDonald and the VLMDAC have done an excellent job deciding what events should receive or not receive funding. The proposed MTRiP retail proxy report was not approved by the group. • Town Manager Report: None. • Lodging Occupancy Reports: The Lodging Occupancy reports were provided in the committees' packets. • Citizen Input: None • Other Business: None • Next Meeting: The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 13, 2012 at The Antlers. 2/21/2012 6 -1 -2 Town of Vail - Sales Summary Winter 2011112, as of 12/31/11 This monthly Sales Tax Collection Summary provides both graphic and brief supporting narrative summaries of sales tax collections in the Town of Vail. It is prepared monthly by town staff in conjunction with MTRIP, and is intended to provide summary information for town management, Town Council, the Vail Economic Advisory Council (VEAC), and Vail Local Marketing District Advisory Council (VLMDAC). 1. Series One is an "All Store" series of sales tax collections from all businesses. The report series is best used to evaluate total sales activity for the current season, compared to last season, and is broken down by both geographic and business segments. 2. Series Two is a "Same Store" fixed set of select businesses (see table below), using gross sales revenue, and is best used to compare the performance of a fixed set of established businesses. 3. Series Three is a Comparison of Set One and Set Two, and can be used to compare and contrast the initial two sets. Comparisons between the two are based on percentage change year over year, thereby mitigating the fact that Series One—All Store is based on sales tax collections and Series Two —Same Store is based on gross sales. All Report sets are further broken down by Geographical subset and by Business Segment. Reports compare current season -to -date results against the previous season, where "Summer" is May — October, and "Winter" is November — April. Note: For purposes of the Series Two "Same Store" comparison, the following businesses are included in their respective sets: The report is produced by the Town of Vail Economic Development Office, with data provided by the Town of Vail Finance Department, and is prepared by MTRIP, the Mountain Travel Research Program. For further information, please contact: Kelli McDonald, Town of Vail Ecot 0' 6n 'bevelopment Manager (970.479.2454, kmcdonald @vailgov.com 6 -2 -1 LODGING RETAIL RESTAURANT VAI L VI LLAG E Austria Haus American Ski Exchange Blu's Gasthoff Gramshammer Blitz La Tour Lodge at Vail Colorado Footwear Red Lion Mountain Haus Golden Bear Russell's Sonnenalp Gorsuch Sweet Basil Vail Mountain Lodge Roxy Vendettas LIONSHEAD Antlers Charlie's T- Shirts Bart & Yeti's Destination Resorts Double Diamond Billy's Lift House Lions Head Jewelers Garfinkel's Lion Square Swedish Clog Cabin Les Delices De France Marriott Vail Ski Bike Tech Moe's Montaneros Vail T -Shirt Montauk The report is produced by the Town of Vail Economic Development Office, with data provided by the Town of Vail Finance Department, and is prepared by MTRIP, the Mountain Travel Research Program. For further information, please contact: Kelli McDonald, Town of Vail Ecot 0' 6n 'bevelopment Manager (970.479.2454, kmcdonald @vailgov.com 6 -2 -1 Town of Vail - Sales Summary Winter 2011112, as of 12/31/11 Series 1: ALL STORE report for Winter 2011/12 (Nov 11 thru Apr 12) $600,000 $500,000 y $400,000 d $300,000 U x $200,000 N $100,000 $0 - $100,000 ACTUALS UY MONTH "All Store" Sales Tax Collections Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 W Retail W Lod es W Restaurants LH Retail LH Lod es LH Restaurants o$ Change �Winter2010 /11 Winter2011 /12 1Ih 1h 3�h 2Ih 18h 1Ih ]h Yb 15h 11h 3h Sh N D N D N D N D N D N D Month (Year-over-year% chang e sh own above month labels) SEASON -TO -DATE CHANGE "All Store" Sales Tax Collections Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 30°k 25°k 6 20°k X d 15 °k N 10% v 5 °k a 0 °k -5 °k ■ VV+LH Com bi ned ❑ Vail Village ® Lionshead 20.9% 17.2% 12.2% 11.7% 2.9 Retail Lodges Restaurants MONTHLY CHANGE "All Store" Sales Tax Collections Winter2011112vs. Winter 2010111 45 40 `_ 35% 30% U A 25% 20% N 15% 10 U 5% a 0% -5 -10 • Nov Dec • WinterTotal VV Retail VV Lodges VV Restaurants LH Retail LH Lodges LH Restaurants In November and December 2011, sales tax collections were up in all sectors /locations (with the exception of a decrease for LH restaurants in December). Winter total sales tax collections to date are UP for: • VV retail • LH retail • VV lodges • LH Lodges • VV restaurants Winter total sales tax collections are DOWN for: • LH restaurants December sales tax collections were UP for: • VV retail • VV lodges • VV restaurants • LH retail • LH lodges December sales tax collections were DOWN for: • LH restaurants The report is produced by the Town of Vail Economic Development Office, with data provided by the Town of Vail Finance Department, and is prepared by MTRiP, the Mountain Travel Research Program. For further information, please contact: Kelli McDonald, Town of Vail Ecoi 66� Manager (970.479.2454, kmcdonald @vailgov.com 6 -2 -2 Town of Vail - Sales Summary Winter 2011112, as of 12/31/11 Series 2: SAME STORE report for Winter 2011/12 (Nov 11 thru Apr 12) $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 N c $3,000,000 N $2,000,000 N $1,000,000 $0 - $1,000,000 6 °k 6 °k y 4 °k y 2 °k E N � 0 °k -2 °k U -4 °k a 6 °k -6 °k ACTUALS BY MONTH "Same Store" Gross Sales Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 W Retail W Lod es W Restaurants LH Retail LH Lodoes LH Restaurants o$ Change +Winter 2010/11 f Winter 2011/12 f � � 1h b°h 8h 1h 9h 6h 21h 4h 8h 6h -1h 8h N D N D N D N D N D N D Month (Year- over -year %change shown above month labels) SEASON -TO -DATE CHANGE "Same Store" Gross Sales Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 6.8% 6.0% 4.1 2.0 6.1 6.5 -2.5% ■ VV+LH Combined ❑Vail Village U Lionshead -6.6 Retail Lodges Restaurants 25 20 N 15% N 10% N 5% U o% -10 MONTHLY CHANGE "Same Store" Gross Sales Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 ■ Nov Dec ■ WinterTotal r VV Retail VV Lodaes VV Restaurants LH Retail LH Lodaes LH Restaurants "Same store" gross sales were up in November and December in all sectors /locations (with the exception of decreases for LH restaurants in November and VV retail in December). Winter total "same store" gross sales are UP for: • LH retail • VV lodges • LH lodges • VV restaurants • LH restaurants Winter total "same store" gross sales are DOWN for: • VV retail December "same store" gross sales were UP for: • VV lodges • VV restaurants • LH retail • LH lodges • LH restaurants December "same store" gross sales were DOWN for: • VV retail The report is produced by the Town of Vail Economic Development Office, with data provided by the Town of Vail Finance Department, and is prepared by MTRiP, the Mountain Travel Research Program. For further information, please contact: Kelli McDonald, Town of Vail Ecoi b;W�'bevelopment Manager (970.479.2454, kmcdonald @vailgov.com 6 -2 -3 Town of Vail - Sales Summary Winter 2011112, as of 12/31/11 Series 3: COMPARISON: ALL STORE VS SAMES STORE for Winter 2011/12 (Nov 11 thru Apr 12) SEASON -TO -DATE CHANGE "All Store" vs. "Same Store' Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 80°k 60°k 40 °k 20°k 0% -20% n -40% -60% 80% 60% 46% 20% 0 °k -20°k n -40°k 60°k 80% 60% 46% 20% 0% -20°k n -40°k 60°k Retail Lodges Restaurants u ALL STORE: Winter2011112 to date uSAMESTORE: Winter 2011112 to date min e e e e 'e V+ LH VV LH VV +LH VV LH VV+LH VV LF MONTHLY CHANGE: VV + LH COMBINED "All Store" vs. "Same Store" Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 Retail Lodging Restaurants L1 ALL STORE: % Change, 2011112 vs. 2010111 u SAMESTORE: %Change, 2011112 vs. 2010111 e e e N D Tot. N D Tot. N D Tot. MONTHLY CHANGE: VAIL VILLAGE "All Store" vs. "Same Store' W i me r 2011112 vs. W i me r 2010111 Vail Village Retail van vmageLodging Vail Village Restaurants M M e e e ❑ALL STORE: % Change, 2011112 vs. 2010111 ® SAME STORE: % Change, 2011112 vs. 2010111 N D Tot. N D Tot. N D Tot. This winter, "same store" gross sales are outpacing "all store" sales tax collections for: • LH retail • LH restaurants This winter, "same store" gross sales are trailin all store" sales tax collections for: • VV retail • VV lodges • LH lodges • VV restaurants Monthly detail — VV+ LH combined • Retail "Same store" trailed "all store" in November and December. • Lodging "Same store" trailed "all store" in November and December. • Restaurants "Same store" trailed "all store" in November and December. Monthly detail — VV • Retail: "Same store" trailed "all store" in November and December. • Lodging "Same store" trailed "all store" in November and December. • Restaurants "Same store" trailed "all store" in November and December. The report is produced by the Town of Vail Economic Development Office, with data provided by the Town of Vail Finance Department, and is prepared by MTRiP, the Mountain Travel Research Program. For further information, please contact: Kelli McDonald, Town of Vail Ecoi 66� Manager (970.479.2454, kmcdonald @vailgov.com 6 -2 -4 Town of Vail - Sales Summary Winter 2011112, as of 12/31/11 80°k 1 60°k 0 40°k r7 20°k 0 °k -20% n -40% -60% MONTHLY CHANGE: LIONSHEAD "All Store" vs. "Same Store" Winter 2011112 vs. Winter 2010111 Lionshead Retail Lionshead Lodging F . -L STORE: % Change,2011112 vs.2010111 ❑ SAME STORE: % Change, 2011112 vs. 2010111 e e N D Tot. N D Tot. N D Tot. Lionshead Restaurants Monthly detail — LH • Retail "Same store" outpaced "all store" in November and December. • Lodging "Same store" trailed "all store" in November and December. • Restaurants "Same store" trailed "all store" in November, but outpaced "all store" in December. The report is produced by the Town of Vail Economic Development Office, with data provided by the Town of Vail Finance Department, and is prepared by MTRiP, the Mountain Travel Research Program. For further information, please contact: Kelli McDonald, Town of Vail Ecoi 66� Manager (970.479.2454, kmcdonald @vailgov.com 6 -2 -5 01 rowN of vain To: Town Council From: Molly Eppard, AIPP Coordinator with direction from AIPP Board Date: February 13, 2012 Memorandum Subject: Review of AIPP Board Membership and Terms: Title 3, Chapter 3, Sections 2 & 3 I. RATIONALE FOR REVIEW OF PRESENT CODE After reviewing the language of this section, staff recommends that it should be amended and clarified regarding AIPP Board Membership. The current ordinance states that there are 11 members appointed by Town Council to serve on the AIPP Board. There are actually 10 members, as the Town Council representative to the Board is not a voting member. After discussions with the Community Development staff, the presence of PEC and DRB members no longer seems a necessity, as it was when this was passed as an ordinance in 1996/1992. If there is significant future development, the AIPP Board would seek advisory representation from PEC and DRB with recommendations from Community Development. However, the day to day functions of the AIPP Board do not require their participation. If these two representatives to the Board were removed it would leave an even number of members. It is suggested to amend the AIPP Board size to 9 at large members. It is also suggested that the terms be on a 2 year basis, so that it is consistent with the other Boards within the Town of Vail. II. PRESENT TERMS AND AMENDED TERMS — 3 -3 -2 Present Terms: The Town Council hereby appoints the Vail Arts Board composed of eleven (11) members who shall act in accordance with the Charter, this Chapter, the direction of the Town Council, the ordinances of the Town and shall be appointed and serve as provided in this Chapter. (Ord. 10(1996): Ord. 7(1992)) Amended Terms: The Town Council hereby appoints the Vail Arts Board composed of nine (9) members at large who shall act in accordance with the Charter, this Chapter, the direction of the Town Council, the ordinances of the Town and shall be appointed and serve as provided in this Chapter. (Ord. 10(1996): Ord. 7(1992)) 2/21/2012 6 -3 -1 III. PRESENT AND AMENDED TERMS 3 -3 -3 Present Terms: The Arts Board shall consist of eleven (11) members appointed by the Town Council which shall include eight (8) members at large, one Town Councilmember, and one Planning and Environmental Commission member and one Design Review Board member. In addition, the Arts Board may consist of honorary advisory members who shall not have the power to vote on issues which come before the Board. The number and term of such advisory members shall be at the discretion of the Town Council. All members of the Arts Board shall be individuals who have demonstrated expertise in architecture, art criticism, art education, art history, foreign arts, graphic arts, interior design, landscape architecture, Town planning, or other art- and design - related fields, or who have demonstrated a strong interest in the visual arts and civic improvement. All members shall either be residents of the Town, or own property within the Town. The terms of the eight (8) members at large of the Arts Board shall be three (3) years on an overlapping basis and shall expire on March 31 of the year of termination. (Ord. 10(1996): Ord. 7(1992)) Amended terms: The Arts Board shall consist of nine (9) members at large appointed by the Town Council. In addition, the Arts Board may consist of honorary advisory members, including a sitting member of Town Council, who shall not have the power to vote on issues which come before the Board. The number and term of such advisory members shall be at the discretion of the Town Council. All members of the Arts Board shall be individuals who have demonstrated expertise in architecture, art criticism, art education, art history, foreign arts, graphic arts, interior design, landscape architecture, Town planning, or other art- and design - related fields, or who have demonstrated a strong interest in the visual arts and civic improvement. All members shall either be residents of the Town, or own property within the Town. The terms of the nine (9) members at large of the Arts Board shall be two (2) years on an overlapping basis and shall expire on March 31 of the year of termination. (Ord. 10(1996): Ord. 7(1992)) IV. RECOMMENDATION Staff would like to ask Council to recommend the Town Attorney to amend the ordinance for first reading. As the AIPP reappointment schedule is for April 2012, staff wanted to seek this direction in an information update at your meeting on February 21. Thank you. Town of Vail Page 2 2/21/2012 6 -3 -2 K � TOWN OF VAI!% VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: Matters from Mayor and Council 2/21/2012 K � TOWN OF'VA10 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012 ITEM /TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24- 6- 402(4)(a)(b)(e) - to discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of property interests; to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Re: Discussion concerning negotiations regarding Ever Vail Redevelopment Agreement. PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire & Stan Zemler 2/21/2012