HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-11-20 Agenda and Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION AGENDA
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, CO 81657
1:30 P.M., NOVEMBER 20, 2012
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied
upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item.
Public comments on work session item may be solicited by the Town
Council.
1.
ITEM/TOPIC: DRB/PEC Update (5 minutes)
PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell
2.
ITEM/TOPIC: A work session to receive instruction from the Vail Town
Council on the Council's initiative to preserve the character of Vail Village.
(60 min.)
PRESENTER(S): George Ruther Tom Braun, Braun Associates
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: A presentation will be made seeking
confirmation of a problem statement, project goals, project scope, and desired
outcomes. The Vail Town Council is asked to listen to the presentation and
provide feedback on the questions asked.
BACKGROUND: Resolution No. 23, Series of 2008, approved by the Vail Town
Council on September 16, 2008, included amendments to Goal 1 of the Master
Plan, which states the following:
"Encourage high quality, redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural
scale of the village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity."
Within this Goal an objective and policy statements were added addressing the the
"historic" importance of architecture, strucutres, landmarks, plazas and features in
preserving the character of Vail Village.
The following action step was identified in the Master Plan to achieve the adopted
objective and policy:
"Compile a list and develop a map identifying the location of potential strucutres,
landmarks, plazass and other similar features that may be of historical
importance."
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Commuity Development
Department recommends the Vail Town Council instructs staff to proceed forward
with the initiative to preserve the character of Vail Village.
3.
ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update and Attachments:
1) Follow up information from VLMD Summer Intercept 2012 Study - Kelli 11/20/2012
McDonald;
2) Follow up information for the 2012 Economic Impact Study of Special
Events - Kelli McDonald;
2) September Vail Business Review-3rd Quarter - Sally Lorton; and
3) Vail Valley Drive Traffic Information - Dwight Henninger
As a follow up to our discussion on traffic enforcement here are the types of
work product produced to assist the officers in determining enforcement
efforts and to see if there are engineering issues that need to be
addressed. As you can see on the attached map most of the crashes are
between Blue Cow Chute and Golden Peak. Additionally from the attached
table you will notice that almost all of the crashes are during the ski
season. Year 2010: 19 crashes; Year 2011: 14; Year 2012: 9; Total: 42.
Only 6 of these crashes are during non-ski season. (15 min.)
4. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor and Council (15 min. )
5.
ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(a)(b)
(e) - to discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of property
interests; to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to
determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Re:
Discussion concerning negotiations regarding Municipal Site
Redevelopment; 2) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive legal advice on
specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and
instruct negotiators, Regarding: update on pending litigation. (60 min.)
PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire
6. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (4:05 p.m.)
NOTE: UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW (ALL ARE
APPROXIMATE DATES AND TIMES AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
--------------------
THE NEXT REGULAR VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK
SESSION WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 12:30 P.M. (or TBD),
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2012 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
CHAMBERS
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Ongoing agenda items TBD: DRB/PEC updates - Warren - WS - 15 min.;
Information Updates Attachments: WS - 15 min.; Executive Session items:
30 min.; Consent Agenda: 5 min.; Town Manager Report: 5 min.
CIRSA board training for TC/PEC - Tami Tanoue/Matt Mire - WS - 60 min. -
12/4
Comcast Franchise Agreement approval - Matt M. - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
1st reading 3rd supplemental to 2012 budget - Kathleen - ES - 30 min. -
12/4
2nd reading Ord #16; 2013 budget ordinance - Kathleen - ES - 30 min. -
12/4
2nd reading of Ord #17; Mil Levy certification - Kathleen - ES - 5 min. - 12/4
2nd reading of Ord #19; Streamtract Zoning Regs - Restoration - George -
ES - 10 min. - 12/4
ERWSD Vail golf course easements - Todd Fessenden - ES - 30 min. -
12/4
Resolution No. 35, Ever Vail Preliminary Plan approval - George/Warren -
ES - 30 min. - 12/4 11/20/2012
CSE Allocations Approval and Mission Statement - Kelli - ES - 15 min. -
12/4
First Reading Vail Golf Course Rezoning - Bill G - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
First Reading Vail Golf Course Text Amendments - Bill G - ES - 30 min. -
12/4
ERWSD Wastewater Management Plan - Diane Johnson?/Tom K - WS - 30
min. - 12/18
Second Reading Vail Golf Course Rezoning - Bill G - ES - 30 min. - 12/18
Second Reading Vail Golf Course Text Amendments - Bill G - ES - 30 min. -
12/18
2nd reading 3rd supplemental to 2012 budget - Kathleen - ES - 30 min. -
12/18
Vail Village Info Center - Suzanne S - WS - 30 min. - 12/18
Citizen Award Dan T. - Daric Harvey/Mark Miller - ES - 5 min. - 12/4 or
12/18
1st reading of Charter Split Ordinance - Matt Mire - ES - 1/8/13
Site Visit - Vail Library - Pam Brandmeyer - 30 min. - WS - 2/13/13
Buy-down program funding discussion - Nina - WS - 30 min. - TBD
Strategic Parking Plan discussion - Greg H. - WS - 30 min. - TBD
Recycling discussion - Kristen B - 30 min. - WS - TBD
Housing Fee in Lieu Discussion – TBD
Ford Park discussion re: noise - Todd O./Greg Hall - WS - 30 min. - TBD
Outdoor Display Goods - George Ruther - TBD
Sister City discussion - TBD
Open Space Discussion with Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space
Director - TBD
Award Contract for Community Development IT Software- George Ruther -
ES - TBD
11/20/2012
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2012
ITEM/TOPIC: DRB/PEC Update
PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell
ATTACHMENTS:
PEC Meeting Results for 11/12/2012
DRB Meeting Results for 11/7/2012
11/20/2012
Page 1
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
November 12, 2012
1:00pm
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME
75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657
**Order and times of agenda items are subject to change**
SITE VISITS
None
20 minutes
1. A request for review of a conditional use permit for “public buildings, grounds and facilities,”
pursuant to Section 12-7A-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, to allow for a temporary fire
station, located at 100 East Meadow Drive, Unit 2 (Village Inn Plaza Phase V)/ Lot M, Block 5D,
Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120040)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Mike McGee
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Approved with conditions(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-1 (Pierce recused)
CONDITION(S):
1. The applicant, Town of Vail, and its tenants shall not use East Meadow Drive for any
loading, delivery, or parking associated with the uses in this commercial
condominium unit of Vail Village Inn Phase V. All loading and delivery shall occur
through the Sebastian hotel joint loading and delivery facility and parking shall occur
in designated areas.
2. This approval shall expire and all equipment and personnel shall be removed from the
commercial unit, seven days after the approval of a building final at the renovated Fire
Station No.2.
Bill Pierce recused himself due to a conflict of interest as he is the project architect for the
ongoing remodel of Fire Station No. 2.
Warren Campbell gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Commissioner Pratt noted concerns about staging the fire truck across the street at the fire
station construction site.
Warren Campbell and Greg Hall explained the accommodations have been made for the truck in
that location.
Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowners Association, asked for clarification about the notice and whether
the proposed use was only offices or also for dwelling units.
Warren Campbell responded that firemen would be using the space as for sleeping quarters,
food preparation, and offices for the on duty crew.
11/20/2012
Page 2
30 minutes
2. A request for a review of an exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12-7J-12, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a limited service lodge, located at 1783 North Frontage Road West (The
Roost Lodge)/ Lots 10, 11, 12, Buffehr Creek Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard
thereto (PEC120041).
Applicant: Timberline Roost Lodge, LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-1-0 (Rediker opposed)
CONDITION(S):
1. This exterior alteration or modification approval is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review application.
2. This exterior alteration or modification approval is contingent upon the applicant
mitigating the impacts on employee housing generated by this redevelopment in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12-23, Commercial Linkage, Vail Town
Code, as may be amended.
3. Prior to the submittal of building permit applications, the applicant must obtain Town
of Vail Public Works Department approval of final civil drawings, in compliance with all
standards of the Vail Town Code.
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise the Traffic Study
to address the 54 surplus parking spaces.
5. As presented, the Traffic Study indicates the net new peak hour trips as 54. This is
based on 112 proposed peak hour trips, less the 52 existing trips, less a 10%
reduction for multi-modal. Therefore, prior to the issuance of a building permit the
applicant shall pay a traffic mitigation fee for system wide transportation
improvements of $351,000 (54 x $6500). This amount shall be revised based on the
updates to the Traffic Study noted above. Portions of this fee may be offset by offsite
traffic/transportation improvements. that are not required by the development;
specifically, the sidewalk from the west property line to Buffehr Creek Road.
6. The developer recognizes that based on the Traffic Study, the SBL 2035 turning
movement has a Level of Service of F if the Simba Run Underpass is constructed. The
developer agrees that if this movement becomes a safety issue in the future this
development will be required to provide improvements to resolve or restrict this
movement.
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall resolve all construction
staging issues shall be resolved prior to construction including staging, phasing,
access, schedules, traffic control, emergency access, parking, loading and delivery,
etc.
8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant must obtain Town of Vail
Public Works Department approval and Colorado Department of Transportation
(CDOT) approval of Right-of-Way and Utility for all construction within the
street/highway right-of-way.
9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant must obtain general Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) approval of all improvements within the
11/20/2012
Page 3
street/highway right-of-way including road improvements and landscaping, and obtain
CDOT approval of an Access Permit.
10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or grading/excavation permit, the applicant
must obtain Town of Vail Public Works Department approval of a shoring and
excavation plan which shall include; excavation phasing, engineered shoring plans,
profile and cross sections. Cross Sections and plans shall include all existing
conflicts (i.e. utilities). The applicant must obtain Colorado Department of
Transportation (CDOT) approval for any shoring within the street/highway right-of-
way. The applicant must also obtain Public Works Department approval and a License
Agreement approval for any shoring within the street/highway right-of-way.
11. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant must obtain Town of Vail
Public Works Department approval of an engineered stamped final drainage report,
pavement design report, and geotechnical report.
12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise the proposed
plans to include all Frontage Road improvements including any necessary lighting,
irrigation, and signage.
13. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide the Town of Vail
an easement, in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney, in the northwest corner of the
property for existing encroachments of the roadway asphalt and shoulder area,
drainage and a 5 foot buffer to accommodate snow storage and a guardrail.
14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall provide the
Town of Vail a public access easement, in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney, for
the pedestrian connection between the bus stop and Meadow Ridge Road. The
applicant may dedication this public access easement in conjunction with the
proposed drainage easement in that area; however, the 10 foot proposed drainage
easement must be widened to accommodate the walkway plus a 2 foot buffer and also
be named as a general utility, drainage, pedestrian access easement.
15. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant must obtain Town of Vail
Public Works Department approval of a snowmelt heat and streetscape maintenance
agreement for those portions of heated walk located within the pedestrian easement
along the western property line.
16. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall construct the
concrete pedestrian walk from the proposed bus stop to Buffehr Creek Road; the walk
shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide.
17. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall coordinate all
Art in Public Places (AIPP) contributions with the Town of Vail Public Works
Department AIPP Coordinator.
18. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall construct a 2.0
inch asphalt overlay for the extent of all constructed Frontage Road improvements.
Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum.
Dominic Mauriello, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the request. He
highlighted that there was no change to the approved bulk and mass, but a conversion of the 28
11/20/2012
Page 4
dwelling units in the project to lodge units. He spoke to the removal of a small architectural
element on the west elevation of the building. He added that the project is compliant with the
current Town Code with regard to employee housing mitigation. He added that a process was
underway in which the Town staff was evaluating the employee housing generation rates for
limited service hotels of this caliber. He concluded by highlighting the projects benefits and a
change request to the Public Works Department’s recommended traffic mitigation condition.
Gregory Bemis, resident of the neighborhood, asked about the number of stories in the structure.
Dominic Mauriello, responded that the number of floors was the same as approved in 2006.
There was no change to approved plans with regard to building height.
Gregory Bemis asked about fire egress on the rear of the building, the retaining wall along the
rear, and requested that exterior lighting be subdued on the rear side of the structure. He added
that the neighborhood understands the need for the project, but expressed concern over the
shadow that might be cast on the street behind.
Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowners Association, asked what the average size of the hotel rooms
would be.
Dominic Mauriello brought up a slide depicting the breakdown of the room types of units.
Jim Lamont asked how fire department access was being provided for the project.
Dominic Mauriello explained that fire department access will be from the frontage road and the
street behind.
Jim Lamont inquired about the landscaping along the north property line.
Dominic Mauriello explained the retaining walls and landscaping.
Jim Lamont inquired as to the ability to reduce the width of pavement in front the structure to
achieve greater landscaping.
Dominic Mauriello explained the area necessary to accommodate a delivery truck turning radius.
Commissioner Pierce asked Tom Kassmel to speak to the applicant’s request for the traffic
impact fee to be off-set by their construction of street improvements.
Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, spoke to the change in policy in 2009 with regard to allowing for
traffic impact fees to be off-set. Tom pointed out that this is the first large scale project, other
than Solaris, which would need to comply with this revised policy.
Commissioner Kurz inquired as to the cost of installing the Simba Run underpass and the traffic
impacts generated.
Tom Kassmel answered Commissioner Kurz’s question.
Commissioner Pratt asked about recommended condition number 18 which would require an
overlay of the street and turn lanes.
Tom Kassmel explained the recommended overlay requirement.
11/20/2012
Page 5
Dominic Mauriello made an argument that the existing approval would be allowed to off-set its
traffic impact fees by constructing improvements and this new policy is a disincentive for the
applicant to convert the approved condominiums to hotel rooms.
Commissioner Kurz stated that it appeared capricious to no longer allow this project, which has
an existing approval, to offset the fees with improvements.
Commissioner Rediker inquired as to the accuracy of the submitted sun/shade analysis.
Dominic Mauriello stated that the analysis was based on final version of the previously approved
building design.
Commissioner Rediker stated that it might be unfortunate for this applicant, but the new traffic
impact fee policy should be assessed. He added that with the design of the roof structure
creates a building with a five stories appearance.
Commissioner Bird how the hotel would transport guests to the ski mountain.
Dominic Mauriello explained how guest could access the nearby bus routes.
Commissioner Bird recommended the applicant consider providing shuttle services for their
guests. She asked if guest could rent rooms for more than 30 days.
Dominic Mauriello clarified that this isn’t an extended stay hotel, but nothing would prohibit a
guest willing to pay the daily rate to stay for long periods.
Commissioner Pratt inquired as to any precedent of a property having two approved
development plans.
Bill Gibson noted that staff was not aware of any similar circumstances.
Commissioner Pratt stated that as the crux of the issue was the conversion of dwelling units to
accommodation units with no changes to the building bulk and mass which he believes is a
benefit to the community. He would be in support of allowing the traffic impact fees to be off-set.
He does not support on-site employee housing units because they are not compatible with hotel
uses in the same building.
Commissioner Cartin asked how the sidewalk along the front of the project will tie in with the
existing sidewalk along the frontage road.
Tom Kasmel explained that this is the “last piece” in bike path system in this neighborhood..
Commissioner Hopkins asked about the service of guest with a bus stop heading west and
adding time to get to the mountain. She also recommended the applicant consider providing
guests with a shuttle service.
Commissioner Kurz inquired about the traffic impact fee associated with the previous approval.
Tom Kassmel clarified how the previous fees could be off-set.
Commissioner Kurz noted his support for allowing the traffic impact fees to be off-set for this
proposal and made a motion for approval with conditions.
11/20/2012
Page 6
Dominic Mauriello clarified that the motion would allow the traffic impact fees to be off-set by the
construction of transportation improvements.
60 minutes
3. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-16-
10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Vail Golf
Course Club House (i.e. accessory buildings, permanent and temporary, and uses customarily
incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional outdoor recreational uses, and necessary for
the operation thereof, including restrooms, drinking fountains, bleachers, concessions, storage
buildings, and similar uses), located at 1775 Sunburst Drive/Lot 3, Sunburst Filing 3 and
Unplatted Parcels (a complete metes and bounds description is available at the Community
Development Department Office), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120036)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Continued to November 26, 2012
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5-0-2 (Pierce and Hopkins recused)
Commissioner Pierce recused himself due to a conflict of interest as he is the project architect on
the temporary golf course buildings and a member of the Fallridge home owners association. He
departed the meeting.
Commissioner Hopkins recused herself due to conflicts of interest as her architecture firm has
submitted an alternative design for the golf course clubhouse project. She also departed the
meeting.
Bill Gibson gave a presentation per the staff memorandum. He covered the three applications
and how together they would permit the reconstruction of the Vail Golf Course.
Commissioner Cartin asked that packets of this size be provide as much in advance as possible.
Commissioner Kurz inquired about the community liaison concept in the proposed operation
plan.
Tom Braun, the applicant’s representative, answered that the operation plan would provide for a
single point of contact for the neighborhood if they have questions or concerns.
Tom Braun gave a presentation highlighting questions asked previously by the Commissioners
about the design and program. He covered the clubhouse banquet/event room occupancy,
traffic trip analysis, Design Review conceptual review comments, the proposed rezoning, the
building height text amendments, and the amended conditional use permit application.
Commissioner Pratt asked if architectural projections would be allowed above the proposed
height limit.
Bill Gibson described how an architectural projection is allowed to be taller than the height limit in
all zone districts in Vail.
Tom Braun then presented each element of the proposed operations plan.
Commissioner Kurz stated that the neighborhood should have a similar liaison that interacts with
the VRD and the Town, and there needs to be accountability on both sides.
11/20/2012
Page 7
Commissioner Bird asked if there was air conditioning planned for the banquet room? She
asked if the bar/grill would also be available for rent by groups.
Greg Hall explained that the bar/grill during the summer would be made solely available to
golfers, but it was a possibility that it could be used by other groups in the winter.
Tom Braun described the proposed parking management plan. He covered statistic collected at
the Donovan Pavilion that may predict the types of events expected and the typical event start
times. He noted that the VRD operates the entire facility, so they would also manage the
parking.
Commissioner Bird inquired as to the enforceability of requiring a shuttle service for certain
events at certain times of day and asked what course of action would be used to prevent parking
on Sunburst Drive.
Tom Braun described how shuttles, parking, and other issues would be part of the contract and
deposit for reserving the banquet room.
Commissioner Kurz stated that parking on Sunburst Drive is a Code Enforcement (Police) issue
and will would to be addressed in that manner.
Commissioner Cartin inquired as to how the switch from general parking to valet parking would
occur and how will it be insured that non-valet cars aren’t blocked in.
Tom Braun explained the anticipated management process.
Commissioner Cartin asked about deliveries.
Pedros Campos explained how and where the loading and delivery will occur.
Dale Bugby, an avid golfer who spends a lot of time on the course, stated that the parking lot is
typically full. If this were any other applicant there would be a new parking structure with a park
on top. The proposed parking plan is flawed since it doesn’t address banquet staff parking.
There is not enough parking for golfing and an event since some rounds of golf go until 8:00 PM.
He covered a letter that he wrote and submitted through Art Abplanalp. An event center is not
compatible with the neighborhood. The property was purchased with open space tax money and
the PEC’s approval of this application will jeopardize the future collection of that tax. This
proposal conflicts with the Pulis covenants. The golf community is opposed to this plan. He
suggested a survey of season golf pass holders to ascertain the feelings on this application. The
Town Council and the VRD Board have made a back-door-deal that neither group will go back
on now. The Town will pay to fix the clubhouse, but only if they get an event center. Neighbors
will be impacts by noise since weddings don’t occur without someone opening the door to go
outside for a smoke. The applicant states that there is minimal change, but the destruction of the
18th green and the baffle nets have negative impacts. The existing clubhouse is a dump, but the
proposed building is out of scale with the neighborhood. The conditional use permit allows new
uses, not the expansion of existing uses. The event size description and parking proposal does
not take into account the total capacity of people in the banquet room, at the grill, on the patio,
and on the lawn area. The applicant is not proposing to prohibit tents. The proposed grill and
too small and won’t be a profitable business. The Commission needs to vote no on the project.
Art Abplanalp, attorney representing several property owners, asked if the members had
received his letter. His response was challenged because the Town was late publishing the
packet. He provide a packet of papers which he believed reflected what the Commissioner had
11/20/2012
Page 8
already received, but he wanted to ensure were a part of the record. He noted their support for
the proposed rezoning of the parking lot. He spoke to the height amendment and that
architectural projections should not be allowed over 33 feet. He spoke to the definition of what is
included as an accessory use to a golf course.
A public golf course does not typically have this type of a facility and it’s not within the
Commissioner purview to approve this application. He stated that a wedding chapel is not
necessary for a golf course. Other golf courses have event facilities separated from the
clubhouse. Facilities for events are not typically found at public golf courses. The proposed
building design looks like the wedding chapel at the Air Force Academy and doesn’t look like a
golf course clubhouse. This is a wedding chapel and restaurant with a clubhouse attached. He
stated that the only goal of this project is build a cash-cow for revenues that will come at the
neighbors’ expense. He compared the sizes of the existing and proposed banquet rooms, patio,
etc. He stated that the proposed chapel and restaurant are not necessary for a golf course. He
noted that the neighbors and golfers are opposed to the project. He objected to the public notice
not acknowledging the conversion of the 18th green. The notice only refers to the clubhouse and
does not speak to the changes on the golf course and the banquet facility. He asked about
bleachers and other items listed in the public notice.
Bill Gibson clarified that term bleachers and the other listed items in the notice is the verbatim
land use language from the Vail Town Code and are not the description of the applicant’s
request.
Art Abplanalp continued that he does not believe the Commission has been made aware of what
the applicant is actually asking for. The proposed conditional use permit is a blank-check.
Nothing being presented by the applicant is for sure, there is no certainty. The proposed
management and operation plan is worthless since the term “may” is used and it doesn’t address
the concerns of the neighbors. If the Commission is going to provide the type of hearing that the
constituents expect, the Commission needs to consider everything before them. He believes
staff will need to be on-site 24-7 to ensure compliance. People are furious about this proposal
but worn down by the review process, so that is why there are so few people in the audience.
Art stated that Warren Pulis himself is opposed to this project. He further noted that during past
Town Council hearings former Mayor Dick Cleveland and current Mayor Andy Daley said the
clubhouse remodel would occur within the footprint of the existing building. He noted than the
neighbors had submitted an alternative design to the Town Council, but have not yet received a
response. He requested that the Commission put an end to the VRD and Town Council’s
arrogance.
Gretchen Bussey a resident of the neighborhood, spoke to her concerns about parking. She
raised concerns about tents,, the process for approving the tents, will the tents have music, and
other questions. She asked who is the proposed neighborhood liaison and who will monitor the
parking lot. She is concerned that the proposed events center is a large size.
Lue Maslak, resident of Sunburst Drive representing herself and her husband, spoke about the
time she and her husband put into finding the perfect property to build their house and retire.
She is opposed to the proposed co-opting of the clubhouse and noted that the building is 1/3 for
golf and 2/3 for events. She noted that the bride’s room appears to be larger than the men’s
locker room. This is a residential neighborhood with bicycles and children and the proposal is
not compatible. She urged the Commission to denying the project.
Jim Lamont, Vail Homeowners Association, thanked those Commissioners who recognized that
they had a conflict of interest and stepped down. He added that in projects such as this with
11/20/2012
Page 9
many cross-currents that other conflicts should be made know. The Town should consider
adopting a code of ethics rather than simply relying on the conflict of interest rules.
He was confused if the neighbor’s alternative plan (referenced by Art Abplanalp) that was
prepared by Snowdon/Hopkins Architects had been submitted to the Commission. He asked the
attorney representing the neighbors if it has been submitted as a part of the record. Art
Abplanalp stated that it had been submitted prior to the last Commission hearing.
Jim Lamont asked if the VRD was a lessee of the Town and if any term of that agreement can be
overturned by the Town Council. There is confusion over the rolls and that the Town and VRD
are one and the same. They are separate entities and the Town can at its discretion modify the
agreement. Therefore, what is approved by this Council can be changed by a future Council.
Te is amused at the operation plan and finds it inadequate when compared to the Golden Peak
operation/management plan. In the Golden Peak Management plan there is a requirement for all
parties (including the neighbors) to be consulted on amendments and changes. The proposed
management plan submitted is dictatorial and not collaborative. He stated that the current
problems at the clubhouse will not go away with the approval of this project and the management
plan doesn’t solve any problems. He clarified that the Vail Homeowners are not a neighborhood
association and there only obligation is to communicate. He suggested that the proposed
building height text should have a separate clubhouse section in the code. He believes there
needs to be a paragraph for all parcels and then specifics for the clubhouse. He noted concern
that property owner adjacent to other Outdoor Recreation District properties have not been
specifically notified about proposed height change and would not support a height increase for all
buildings. The lack of landscaping along the south end of the parking lot is symptomatic of this
whole process. The Commission, even in their limited role, needs to send the message that the
applicant is not being a good neighbor.
Commissioner Kurz inquired of Matt Mire, Town Attorney, if approval of this project would
jeopardizing the collection of real estate transfer tax (as asserted by Dale Bugby).
Matt Mire answered no.
Commissioner Rediker inquired about the property covenant and any current or potential
violations.
Mire Mire said he has issued a legal opinion that he can share with the Commission in executive
session, but due to the ongoing litigation he will not disclose that opinion in the hearing. He
clarified that private coventents are outside the scope of the Commission scope of review.
Commissioner Rediker stated that as he reads the Outdoor Recreation District and he does not
read anything about a banquet facility, etc. He asked for clarification.
Bill Gibson read from the district stating that the golf course is a permitted use and the clubhouse
and related uses are accessory and subject to the review of a conditional use permit.
Commissioner Rediker inquired further about what is considered accessory. He does see how
someone could object to a pro shop, locker rooms, etc.; but was unclear whether or not a
banquet facility would be objectionable or not permitted.
Tom Braun, stated that the Town Code is not clear on the specific uses within the club house,
but many golf courses include a banquet facility.
11/20/2012
Page 10
Bill Gibson gave an example of City Market which is a grocery store. However, within that
grocery store there may be various types of the activities such as a pharmacy, photo
development, movie rentals, a deli, etc.
Commissioner Rediker noted that some concerns from the neighbors are being overblown and
some of their rhetoric is weird. He stated that this proposal is not a wedding chapel.
Art Abplanalp state that the covenant language and the Code include very similar language.
Dale Bugby added that everyone should read the Pulis deed as it states “only what is required”.
Bill Gibson clarified that the covenants are beyond the scope of the Commission’s review.
Commissioner Kurz stated his concerns about formalizing a liaison and his concerns about the
proposed building height language. Address Jim Lamont’s comments, Commissioner Kurz
disclosed that he serves on the Vail Local Marketing District and he is married to the VLMD
Coordinator; but this has no influence over him in reviewing this project.
Commissioner Bird suggested that the bride room be relabeled on the plans to be a meeting
room. She agrees that height needs to be more clearly defined and she is not sold on the
parking plan.
Commissioner Cartin asked the applicant to clearly identify the proposed conditional use permit
area.
Commissioner Pratt asked how tents are allowed.
Bill Gibson explained that there are two processes. There is a conditional use permit review
process for seasonal uses and structures, and there is a special event process through the
Committee on Special Events.
Commissioner Cartin agreed Jim Lamont’s recommendation to separate the code language
regarding building height for clubhouses. He clarified that the Commission is a judicial review
body, and does not make a decisions about the configuration of the holes at the golf course.
Bill Gibson clarified that the height architectural projections is not unlimited. The Town Code
limits there height to be 25% more than the height listed in every zone district. He gave an
example of an existing architectural projection in the neighborhood and described how the
observatory tower at the Maslak was approved to exceed the height limit of the Two-Family
Primary/Secondary District.
Commissioner Kurz suggested that the Commission take action on the proposed rezoning and
text amendment.
Commissioner Pratt noted his concern that the parking study shows enough parking, but
anecdotal evidence from the neighbors suggests otherwise. The retaining wall on the south end
of the lot should be looked at and reworked to achieve an improved buffer. He recommended
that the lawn area included in the conditional use permit area or that tents should not be erected.
The management plan seems to be reactive verses proactive. He wonders how all the elements
of the management plan are addressed real time during an event. He pointed out that the
drainage report speaks to surface drainage to an open ditch. He recommended that the
applicant install a sand and oil separator. He would like to see some sort of trigger for the
11/20/2012
Page 11
management plan to return to the Commission for review should a certain number of complaints
be received or maybe after one year of operation.
Motions were made on the rezoning and text amendments.
Tom Braun asked for clarification on the issues of concern.
The Commission summarized their concerns about parking and the day of management of
events.
Commissioner Kurz noted that he does not remember seeing an alternative plan proposal.
Commissioner Pratt stated that any alternative plan needs to be presented to the applicant and
not to the Commission.
Tom Braun noted that they would look into Commissioner Pratt suggestion of a trigger to re-
review any approvals.
Art Abplanalp noted that the exhibit in the document he submitted earlier in the hearing includes
the neighbor’s alterative plan and stated the that Commission should approve what the applicant
is proposing.
Commissioner Pratt again stated that the decision of what to propose is up to the applicant, not
the Commission.
20 minutes
4. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary
amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of
the Vail Golf Course parking lot from the General Use District to the Outdoor Recreation District,
located at 1775 Sunburst Drive/Lot 3, Sunburst Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC120037)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Recommendation of approval
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Rediker VOTE: 5-0-2 (Pierce and Hopkins recused)
20 minutes
5. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on prescribed regulation amendments,
pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to Section
12-8B-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to increase the allowable building height within the Outdoor
Recreation District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120039)
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Recommendation of approval
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5-0-2 (Pierce and Hopkins recused)
6. A request for the review of conditional use permits, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional
Uses, Vail Town Code, for a healthcare facility and a public building and grounds, to allow for the
redevelopment of the Town of Vail municipal site with a medical research, rehabilitation, and
office building and a municipal office building located at 75 and 111 South Frontage Road West/
Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120012)
11/20/2012
Page 12
Applicant: Vail MOB, LLC, represented by Triumph Development and Town of Vail, represented
by Consilium Partners, Vail
Planner: Warren Campbell
ACTION: Withdrawn
7. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12-6G-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of a garage
within the setbacks, located at 4192 Columbine Way/Lots 25 & 26, Bighorn Terrace, and setting
forth details in regard thereto. (PEC120027)
Applicant: Anne Upton, represented by Pierce Architects
Planner: Bill Gibson
ACTION: Table to December 10, 2012
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 7-0-0
8. Approval of October 22, 2012 minutes
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 7-0-0
9. Information Update
10. Adjournment
MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Bird VOTE: 5-0-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published November 9, 2012, in the Vail Daily.
11/20/2012
Page 1
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
PUBLIC MEETING
November 7, 2012
Council Chambers
75 South Frontage Road West - Vail, Colorado, 81657
**Order and times of agenda items are subject to change**
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Tom DuBois
Andy Forstl
Brian Gillette
Rollie Kjesbo
Libby Maio
LEGAL TRAINING 12:30pm
Matt Mire, Town Attorney will provide a presentation
PROJECT ORIENTATION 1:00pm
SITE VISITS
1. Mullaly Residence – 288 Bridge Street
2. Graham Residence – 123 Willow Place
3. Esteve, Barrios, and DeLaLama Residences – 520 East Lionshead Circle
4. Bridge Street Lodge – 278 Hanson Ranch Road
5. Lamina Jewelry – 1 Willow Bridge Road
6. Golf Course Clubhouse – 1775 Sunburst Drive
7. Lionshead RV Lot – 350 South Frontage Road West
MAIN AGENDA 3:00pm
1. Mullaly Residence DRB120530 / 10 minutes Warren
Final review of a change to approved plans (window)
288 Bridge Street Unit R-2 (Rucksack Building)/Lot D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Margo Mullaly, represented by VMD Architects
ACTION: Tabled to November 21, 2012
MOTION: Maio SECOND: Forstl VOTE: 4-0-1 (DuBois recused)
2. Graham Residence DRB120546 / 10 minutes Warren
Final review of changes to approved plans (roof material)
123 Willow Place Unit 3 (Summers Lodge)/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Richard and Kimberly Graham, represented by VMD Architects
ACTION: Approved
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Maio VOTE: 4-0-1 (DuBois recused)
3. Esteve, Barrios, and DeLaLama Residences DRB120433 / 15 minutes Bill
Final review of an addition (bedrooms)
520 East Lionshead Circle (Lionshead Centre) / Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Suman Architects
ACTION: Tabled to November 21, 2012
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Maio VOTE: 5-0-0
11/20/2012
Page 2
4. Bridge Street Lodge DRB120536 / 15 minutes Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping)
278 Hanson Ranch Road (Bridge Street Lodge)/Lots A & B, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Bridge Street Lodge Condo Association, represented by Green Valley Landscaping Inc.
ACTION: Tabled to November 21, 2012
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 5-0-0
5. Lamina Jewelry DRB120537 / 10 minutes Warren
Final review of a new sign (business identification)
1 Willow Bridge Road/Lot 2 Sonnenalp Subdivision
Applicant: One Willow Bridge Commercial LLC, represented by Sign Design & Graphics LLC
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 5-0-0
CONDITION(S):
1. The applicant shall apply a satin finish clear coat on the copper background to reduce the
reflectivity of the sign.
6. Town of Vail DRB120544 / 45 minutes Bill
Conceptual review of an addition (golf course clubhouse)
1775 Sunburst Drive (Vail Golf Course)/Unplatted and Lot 3, Sunburst Filing 3
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall
ACTION: Conceptual, no vote
7. Lionshead RV Lot Cell Tower DRB120474 / 15 minutes Warren
Final review of new construction (temporary cellular antenna)
350 South Frontage Road West/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Ralph Walker
ACTION: Approved with condition(s)
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Maio VOTE: 5-0-0
CONDITION(S):
1. The applicant shall resolve all Town of Vail staff concerns with regard to the location and
orientation of the cellular on wheels prior to submitting an application for a Building Permit.
2. The applicant shall remove the cellular on wheels and all associated equipment and improvements
by no later than May 1, 2013.
STAFF APPROVALS
Wallner Residence DRB120500 Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (windows, door)
1141 Casolar Del Norte Unit A/Lot A-7, Block A, Lion’s Ridge Filing 1
Applicant: Jack and Janie Wallner, represented by Stephen O’Brien
Centennial Bank DRB120507 Bill
Final review of a sign (business identification)
2111 North Frontage Road West/Vail Das Schone Filing 3
Applicant: West Vail Associates, represented by Alison Dickson
Vail Golf Course DRB120508 Bill
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping)
1775 Sunburst Drive/Unplatted
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Scott O’Connell
11/20/2012
Page 3
Prince Victoria LLP DRB120509 Warren
Final review of changes to approved plans (landscaping)
616 Forest Road/ Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 6
Applicant: Prince Victoria LLP, represented by Scott Turnipseed
Mill Creek Court DRB120513 Rachel
Final review of changes to approved plans (awning)
302 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot I, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 5
Applicant: Montage Properties, represented by Jon Stevenson
Mill Creek Court DRB120514 Rachel
Final review of a sign application (building identification)
302 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot I, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 5
Applicant: Montage Properties, represented by Jon Stevenson
Solaris DRB120515 Warren
Final review of a sign application (public parking on private property)
141 East Meadow Drive (Solaris)/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Solaris, represented by Jon Boord
Thomas Residence DRB120516 Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (garage doors)
4027 Lupine Drive/Lot 6, Block 1, Bighorn 1st
Applicant: Trudy F. Thomas
Snow Forest Chalet DRB120518 Rachel
Final review of changes to approved plans (windows)
186 Forest Road/ Lot 9, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: Gies Architects, Inc.
Quiksilver/Roxy DRB120519 Warren
Final review of sign application (business identification)
675 Lionshead Place Unit P214 (The Arrabelle at Vail Square)/ Lot 1 & 2, Lionshead Filing 6
Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Sign Design
One Willow Bridge Commercial DRB120521 Rachel
Final review of changes to approved plans (landscape planter)
1 Willow Bridge Road/ Lot 2, Sonnenalp Subdivision
Applicant: One Willow Bridge Commercial, LLC, represented by Sharon Cohn
Dolgin Residence DRB120522 Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (A/C condenser)
174 Gore C21reek Drive/Lot A, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1
Applicant: 248 LAV LLC, represented by Jeffrey Manley
Lapin Residence DRB120523 Bill
Final review of changes to approved plans (landscaping)
232 West Meadow Drive/Lot 7, Vail Village Filing 2
Applicant: Mervin Lapin, represented by Benno Scheidegger
Lapin Residence DRB120524 Bill
Final review of changes to approved plans (entry door)
232 West Meadow Drive/Lot 7, Vail Village Filing 2
Applicant: Mervin Lapin, represented by Hans Berglund
11/20/2012
Page 4
Vail 21 DRB120526 Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping)
521 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1
Applicant: Vail 21 Condominium Association Inc, represented by Geoffrey Wright
Deighan Residence DRB120528 Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (window removal)
2572 Cortina Lane/Lot 3, Block F, Vail Das Schone Filing 1
Applicant: Robin L. Deighan, represented by SRE Building Associates
Wolff/Pierce Residence DRB120529 Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (repaint)
2724 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 28, Block 3, Vail Village Filing 13
Applicant: Larry Wolff
Tanous Residence DRB120534 Warren
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (doors and windows)
4580 Racquest Club Drive Building 3 Unit 5/Unplatted
Applicant: Joanie Tanous, represented by Ankerholz Inc.
Beckley Residence DRB120535 Tom
Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping)
2508 Arosa Drive/Lot 11, Block C, Vail Das Schone Filing 1
Applicant: Travis and Kathy Beckley, represented by Larry Kalusin
Suszynski Residence DRB120538 Warren
Final review of changes to approved plans (deck)
1481 Aspen Grove Lane/Lot 1, Block 2, Lion’s Ridge Filing 1
Applicant: Kristina and Conrad Suszynski, represented by David Herrell
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner’s office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
11/20/2012
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2012
ITEM/TOPIC: A work session to receive instruction from the Vail Town Council on the
Council's initiative to preserve the character of Vail Village.
PRESENTER(S): George Ruther Tom Braun, Braun Associates
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: A presentation will be made seeking confirmation of a
problem statement, project goals, project scope, and desired outcomes. The Vail Town
Council is asked to listen to the presentation and provide feedback on the questions asked.
BACKGROUND: Resolution No. 23, Series of 2008, approved by the Vail Town Council on
September 16, 2008, included amendments to Goal 1 of the Master Plan, which states the
following:
"Encourage high quality, redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the
village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity."
Within this Goal an objective and policy statements were added addressing the the "historic"
importance of architecture, strucutres, landmarks, plazas and features in preserving the
character of Vail Village.
The following action step was identified in the Master Plan to achieve the adopted objective
and policy:
"Compile a list and develop a map identifying the location of potential strucutres, landmarks,
plazass and other similar features that may be of historical importance."
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Commuity Development Department recommends the
Vail Town Council instructs staff to proceed forward with the initiative to preserve the character
of Vail Village.
ATTACHMENTS:
Power Point Presentation
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
VAIL VILLAGE 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyVail Village Master Plan
Goal #1
Encourage high quality redevelopment while
preserving the architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyVail Village Master PlanObjective 1.4
Recognize the “historic” importance of the architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features
in preserving the character of
Vail Village. 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyVail Village Master Plan
Policy 1.4.1 The historical importance of structures, landmarks, plazas and other similar features shall be taken into consideration in the development review process.Policy 1.4.2The town shall grant flexibility in the interpretation and implementation of its regulations and guidelines to help protect and maintain the existing character of the Vail VillagePolicy 1.4.3Identification of “historic” importance shall not be used as the sole means of preventing or prohibiting development in Vail Village. 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyPurpose of Today’s DiscussionConfirm the “task at hand”
Confirm the goals/objectives of this effortConfirm the work products and outcomeConfirm the approach/scope of work
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
Vail Village Development Review “Tools”The Vail Plan
Zoning Regulations
Design Review Guidelines
Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
Vail Village Urban Design Considerations
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study. . . . . to identify aspects of the physical character of the
Village
and to assure as far as possible that future changes will be consistent with the established character, and will make positive contributions to the quality of life. . . . . recent rapid growth, both in size and popularity, has introduced new pressures for development, which many feel threaten the unique qualities
from which that
success has been derived. 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
There are rapidly increasing land values and resulting pressures to expand existing buildings, infill parcels, and even totally redevelop parcels less than 15 years old. This
pressure for growth has brought with it the potential for significant change.
That is not to imply that all growth and change in Vail is negative
. There are many areas that are
underdeveloped. The actual area of Vail that gives it its unique character is but a small area of the Village. There are definitely opportunities to extend the character of the Core
beyond its current limits.
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study. . . . . to identify aspects of the physical character of the Village
and to
assure as far as
possible that future changes will be cons
istent with the es
tablished character, and will
make positive contributions to the quality of life.
. . . . recent rapid growth, both in size and popularity, has introduced
new pressures for
development, which many feel threaten the unique qualities
from which that success
has been derived.
There are rapidly increasing land values
and resulting pressures to expand existing buildings, infill parcels, and even totally redevelop parcels less than 15 years old. This
pressure for growth has brought with
it the potential for significant change.
That is
not to imply that all growth and change in Vail is negative. There are many areas
that are underdeveloped. T
he actual area of Vail that gives it its unique character is but
a small area of the Village. There are definitely opportunities
to extend the character of
the Core
beyond its current limits.
-Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, 1980 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
GORE CREEK DRIVE 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
MILL CREEK COURT BUILDING 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyPEPI’S 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
KIANDRA LODGE/ONE WILLOW PLACE 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE/BRIDG
E STREET LODGE
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
BELL TOWER BUILDING 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
THE BUILDINGS 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
THE BUILDINGS 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
THE BUILDINGS 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
PLACES AND SPACES 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
PLACES AND SPACES 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
STREETS AND CORRIDORS 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyVIEWS 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
WINDOWS AND DOORS 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyDETAILING 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
RECENT PROJECTS 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
THE QUESTION AT HANDAs buildings in the Village continue to re-develop or other changes occur in the Village, are the Town’s current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure
that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced? 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
PROJECT GOALS/OBJECTIVES•Identify buildings, structures, landmarks, plazas and other features that define or contribute to the character of Vail Village.
•Re-evaluate regulatory tools with respect to how they can preserve the unique architectural scale of Vail Village in order to sustain its sense of place.
•Assess potential refinements to regulatory tools and potential alternatives to regulatory tools
•Determine strategy/steps for implementation 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
PROJECT OUTCOME•Define the features that contribute to the character of Vail Village
•Answer the question –are the Town’s current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced?•If “yes”, we’ve done our job•If “no”, we’ve defined a strategy for implementing the tools needed to ensure the Village’s character is maintained and enhanced
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
SCOPE/APPROACH TO PROJECTStep #1 -Data Gathering/Inventory of VillageStep #2 -Evaluate existing regulations and guidelines
Step #3 -Community Meeting(s)
Step #4 -Evaluate alternative approachesStep #5 –Define Next Steps
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character StudyVillage Inventory and Evaluation –On-goingHost Community Meeting #1 -DecemberEngage Stakeholders
Joint TC/PEC Work Session #1 -JanuaryEvaluate Alternative Approaches
Host Community Meeting #2 -FebruaryPEC Work Session #2 -MarchTC Work Session #3 -AprilSCHEDULE/NEXT STEPSApril 16
th
–final TC presentation
11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study
Confirm “task at hand”
Confirm project goals/objectives
Confirm approach to project/scopeConfirm project outcome
WRAP UP 11/20/2012
Vail Village Character Study 11/20/2012
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2012
ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update and Attachments:
1) Follow up information from VLMD Summer Intercept 2012 Study - Kelli McDonald;
2) Follow up information for the 2012 Economic Impact Study of Special Events - Kelli
McDonald;
2) September Vail Business Review-3rd Quarter - Sally Lorton; and
3) Vail Valley Drive Traffic Information - Dwight Henninger
As a follow up to our discussion on traffic enforcement here are the types of work product
produced to assist the officers in determining enforcement efforts and to see if there are
engineering issues that need to be addressed. As you can see on the attached map most of
the crashes are between Blue Cow Chute and Golden Peak. Additionally from the attached
table you will notice that almost all of the crashes are during the ski season. Year 2010: 19
crashes; Year 2011: 14; Year 2012: 9; Total: 42. Only 6 of these crashes are during non-ski
season.
ATTACHMENTS:
2013 Intercept Study Memorandum
Special Event Economic Impact memorandum
September Vail Business Review - 3rd Qtr
Accidents on Vail Valley Drive diagram
MVAs on Vail Valley Drive
11/20/2012
MEMO
To: Vail Town Council
CC: Kelli McDonald, Chris Romer
From: Bryant Leech, Doug Westenskow
Re: 2013 Vail Summer Intercept Study
The following is provided as response to questions raised by the Vail Town Council at the
November 6, 2012 work session regarding the Summer Intercept Study completed by Vail
Resorts market research team on behalf of the Vail Local Marketing District during summer
2012.
Please let us know any questions.
1. What are the key takeaways and recommended actions?
• Slide 5 has many of my recommendation but here is the quick wrap up:
o The recommendation is we should leverage our high satisfaction scores and use
our clientele to recommend our product. We need to continue to remind families
about our resort and promote our family friendly atmosphere. In addition, we
should align our summer message with the winter message to attract international
clientele.
o The key takeaways were that Vail¹s clientele are still wealthy families looking for
a relaxing vacation with their children. These clients are very happy with the
amenities and activities we provide and enjoy the scenic beauty of Vail in
addition to spending time on family oriented activities.
2. How does the planned infrastructure for Epic Discovery fit with the low exertion family
activities outlined in the research?
• Zip lining fits perfectly into our model of low excursion family oriented activities. It does
not take a lot of effort to go zip line and in marketing this activity we need to focus on the
family fun atmosphere that this activity presents. It will be perfect considering our
clientele are interested in entertaining their children without a high level of excursion.
3. Is the international guest underrepresented in this report?
• We don¹t believe the international guest is underrepresented and if they are it is no less
than the winter. International guests participate in our activities around the village just
like the rest of the guests and have just as much chance of being surveyed as our
domestic guest. With large efforts from our marketing teams to bring international guest
to Vail for the winter it doesn¹t surprise us that summer would have a lower percentage of
international guests.
4. Please explain the difference in responses relative to event answers
from respondents in slides 16, 17 and 18
• Slide 16: This slide shows the importance people place in Vail putting on different events
11/20/2012
and activities throughout the summer. This is NOT interest level in new events although
that might be a good addition for next year.
• Slide 17- This question is directed at what events guests would be interested in returning
for. This is not directed to find out about events we currently run and is trying to find out
what new events a guest would be interested in. In surveying, we did not find this
question to be an issue, most guests understood that this was about new events and
answered accordingly. Our clientele would be interested in new concerts and festivals. If
we added concerts and festivals in line with our customer¹s interests we could see a boost
in visitation.
• Slide 18- This slide is interested in finding out what kind of activities guest participated
in. I would say that there is a chance that concert/festivals are under represented since our
surveyors might miss a guest that would go directly to a venue like ford park and would
then not be represented in our sample. The low representation of that activity should not
deter future concerts and festivals since guests commented that is what they are interested
in seeing more of. Overall this slide does show that most of our guest do participate in
activities that are family oriented and do not require a high level of excursion.
5. Slide 21 please give more detail on breakout of Denver, Boulder, Greeley
• The PMSA (Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area) is a tool as defined by the Census
Bureau. Additional information and detailed breakouts have been added per the request
of the council.
11/20/2012
Town of Vail 2012 Summer Intercept Final Report
November 6th
2012
Photo by Jack Affleck
11/20/2012
Objectives
• To gain a picture of where Town of Vail guests reside and how satisfied they are
with their experience.
• To identify which summer events and activities guests participate in.
• To understand additional event themes that guests would be interested in seeing.
Methodology
• Intercept surveys are conducted around Vail Village and Lionshead in a random
fashion to obtain a diverse sample.
• 1,264 Intercept Surveys were conducted between May 25th-September 3rd
• Surveys are conducted between 10-4pm Wednesday thru Sunday
Sample Sizes
2012 Study - 1,264
2010 Study - 1,267
2007 Study - 1,133
2 Town of Vail | 11/6/12
Objectives and Methodology
11/20/2012
3 Town of Vail | 11/6/12
Executive Summary
Satisfaction
ü Town of Vail NPS was an 82.
• Town of Vail NPS has increased when compared to the last two studies in 2007 & 2010.
ü Overall experience satisfaction increased compared to two years ago.
ü Value for price paid has increased compared to the last two surveys.
Visitation
ü There was an increase (+17%) in the number of guests who chose to fly into Colorado instead of
driving, a possible sign of a recovering economy.
ü There was an increase (+8%) of guests who stayed in Paid Lodging when compared to last
season, possibly due to a recovering economy.
ü Activities that do not include a high level of physical exertion seem to be the most popular during
the summer which coincides with one of the main reasons they visit Vail for “Rest and Relaxation”.
11/20/2012
4 Town of Vail | 11/6/12
Executive Summary Continued…
Events and Activities
ü Over 80% of respondents stated that it is important for Vail to offer special events through out the
summer.
ü Music Festivals/Concerts and Sporting Events continue to be the top events that guests would
back to Vail specifically for.
Guest Demographics
ü The Mexico and England markets have continued to grow year over year.
ü The number of respondents who mentioned that they are here with family (including kids)
increased (4%) from last year.
ü The mean income of respondents has increased (+$5,000) from the respondents in 2010.
ü Other demographics are generally consistent with the study done two years ago.
11/20/2012
5 Town of Vail | 11/6/12
Recommendations
• Our customers are very happy with their experience at Vail, shown through the high
NPS and satisfaction scores, continue to drive our marketing messages to these core
clients.
• Families are becoming a larger percentage of our guests, continuing to market towards
families could help increase overall Vail visitation.
• Mexico and England are our largest international markets, showing continuous growth
year over year. Aligning Vail’s summer marketing message to attract international
clientele could boost summer visitation.
• Low exertion family oriented activities will have the best adoption from our guests. With
signs of the economy recovering we need to continue to push for new activities that will
be in line with these guests interests.
11/20/2012
Net Promoter Score & Satisfaction
November 6th
2012
Photo by Jack Affleck
11/20/2012
7
Net Promoter Score
Summer 2012: Active Promoter (84%) – Detractors (2%) = NPS (82)
Not only will a guest with a higher recommendation have a higher propensity to return, but will actively
promote the resort to other prospective guests – the most effective form of marketing. A Net Promoter
Score of 75 is considered to represent world-class loyalty.
• Town of Vail NPS has increased when compared to the last two studies in 2007 & 2010.
• An NPS of 82 is considered to be an excellent score.
84%
75%
69%
14%
22%
24%7%
3%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
Active PromoterPassive SupporterDetractor
NPS=82
NPS=72
NPS=62
Summer 2012 (n=1259)
Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | On a scale of 0 - 10 (0=Not at all likely, 10=Highly likely), how likely would you be to
recommend Vail to your friends/family as a summer vacaKon desKnaKon? 11/20/2012
8 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | Where 1 is not saKsfied at all and 5 extremely saKsfied, how saKsfied are you with yo
overall experience in Vail?
90%
70%
9%
27%3%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
5-Extremely Satisfied4321-Not Satisfied at All
Mean=4.9
Mean=4.7
• 90% of the respondents were “Extremely Satisfied” with their overall experience in Vail this summer.
• Nearly all respondents were satisfied with their overall experience in Vail year over year.
Overall Experience
Summer 2012 (n=1207)
11/20/2012
9 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | Where 1 is not saKsfied at all and 5 extremely saKsfied, how saKsfied are you with t
value for price paid for this trip?
Value for Price Paid
71%
64%
46%
22%
27%
5%
27%24%
8%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
5-Extremely Satisfied4321-Not Satisfied at All
• Satisfaction with the price paid for this trip has increased. Guests are generally satisfied as they feel
there is a better value for their dollar.
Summer 2012 (n=605)
Mean=4.6
Mean=4.5
Mean=4.2
11/20/2012
Visitation
November 6th
2012
Photo by Jack Affleck
11/20/2012
11 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What is the purpose of this visit to Vail?
Purpose of Visit
• Enjoying the Natural Beauty of the Rocky Mountains and Rest and Relaxation continue to be the main
reasons why guests visit Vail in the summer.
52%
50%
28%
24%
19%
6%
5%
3%
3%
2%
1%
1%
7%
21%
56%
15%
8%
6%
1%
2%
3%
1%
11%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
Enjoying the Natural Beauty of the Rocky Mtns
Rest and Relaxation
*Enjoyment of the Town (shopping, dining, leisure)
*Participate in Outdoor Activities
Visiting Friends/ Family
Attend Special Event
Combining Business w/ Pleasure
*Wedding
Business Trip/ Conference
Attend Competitive Sporting Event
Previous Experience
Medical Treatment/ Consultation
Other
Summer '12
Summer '10
Some Other
Reasons:
Vacation, To get
away from the
heat, and
Birthday .
*These purposes were added for the 2012 study
Summer 2012 (n=964)
11/20/2012
12 Town of Vail | 11/6/12
Market Segment
• Over ¾ of all respondents were overnight guests to Vail this summer.
17%
18%
9%
5%
10%
19%56%
47%
63%
3%
3%
6%3%19%
22%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
LocalIn-state Day/Drive Day
In-state Overnight/Drive OvernightOut-of-state/Domestic Destination
International
Summer 2012 (n=1244)
11/20/2012
13 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | Prior to this trip, when did you last visit Vail?
Previous Visitation
• Nearly 20% of respondents said that it was their first visit to Vail.
• Over 1/3 of respondents had visited Vail in the past but hadn’t been here since before last summer.
12%16%17%36%19%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
This Summer 2012
Last Winter 11/12
Last Summer 2011
Before Last Summer
First Visit
Summer 2012 (n=954)
11/20/2012
14 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What type of accommodaKons are you using this trip?
Lodging
• There was an increase (+8%) of guests who stayed in Paid Lodging when compared to last season,
possibly due to a recovering economy.
49%
41%
49%
10%
12%
13%
7%
8%
9%
7%
11%4%
24%
28%
12%11%
3%
4%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
Paid LodgingFriends/Family2nd HomeTimeshareOtherPrimary Residence
Summer 2012 (n=1254)
11/20/2012
Events and Activities
November 6th
2012
Photo by Jack Affleck
11/20/2012
16 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | Where 1 is not at all important and 5 extremely important, how important is it for
Vail to offer a variety of special events throughout the summer?
Importance of Having Events?
• Over 80% of respondents stated that it is important for Vail to offer special events through out the
summer.
68%
45%
51%
13%
23%
21%
13%
16%
19%
6%
3%
9%
5%
5%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
5-Extremely Important4321-Not At All Important
Mean=4.4
Mean=3.9
Mean=4.1
Summer 2012 (n=955)
11/20/2012
17 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What one type of summer event would you most likely come back to Vail for?
53%
14%
11%
7%
6%
3%
2%
5%
37%
23%
7%
7%
9%
5%
5%
9%
50%
20%
11%
9%
6%
4%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
Music Festivals/Concerts
Sporting Events
I would not come back just for a
summer event
Art Festivals
Food Festivals
Holiday Events (4th of July, Labor
Day, etc)
Seasonal Events (Oktoberfest)
Other-Specify
Summer '12*Summer '10Summer '07
• Music Festivals/Concerts and Sporting Events continue to be the top events that guests would back to
Vail specifically for.
• Over ½ half of guests mentioned Music Festivals and Concerts as an event they would return for.
Summer 2012 (n=764)
* The list of options was expanded in 2010.
What Type of Event Would You Come Back to Vail For?
11/20/2012
18 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | Which of the following acKviKes have you parKcipated in (or plan to) on this trip
43%
40%
38%
28%
25%
20%
19%
9%
8%
7%
6%
6%
6%
5%
39%
24%
22%
16%
29%
7%
13%
7%
12%
7%
5%
9%
7%
12%
2%
49%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
Hiking
Shopping
Rest/ Relaxation
Sightseeing
Mtn Biking
Walking
Scenic Chairlift Rides
Road Biking
Golf
Fishing
Horseback Riding
Whitewater Rafting
Elegant Restaurant Dining
Performing Arts/ Cultural Events/ Concerts
Bungee Trampoline
Summer '12
Summer '10
• Hiking continues to be the most popular summer activity at Vail.
• Activities that do not include a high level of physical exertion seem to be the most popular during the
summer which coincides with one of the main reasons they visit Vail for “Rest and Relaxation”.
Summer 2012 (n=964)
Top 15 Activities
11/20/2012
Guest Demographics
November 6th
2012
Photo by Jack Affleck
11/20/2012
20 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What is the zip code/country of your primary residence?
Top 10 State Visitation
• As destination guests are starting to travel more, the percentage of guests visiting from other
parts of Colorado has decreased.
• Guests from Texas, California and Illinois remain the largest markets of destination guests.
43%
9%
5%
4%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
50%
3%
4%
2%
2%
2%
6%
4%
5%
3%
2%
2%
2%
3%
2%
1%
1%
3%
8%
8%
30%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
Colorado
Texas
California
Illinois
Florida
Kansas
Georgia
Minnesota
Missouri
New York
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
Summer 2012 (n=1209)
11/20/2012
21 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What is the zip code/country of your primary residence?
Top 10 PMSA/MSA Visitation
• The top three destination PMSA/MSA’s are Chicago, Dallas and Houston.
26%
4%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
24%
3%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
2%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
2%
2%
1%
3%
3%3%
25%
0%10%20%30%40%
Denver, Boulder, Greeley, CO
Chicago, IL
Dallas, TX
Colorado Springs, CO
Houston, TX
Austin-San Marcos, TX
Atlanta, GA
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI, MN
Kansas City, MO-KS, MO
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ
New York, NY
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
Summer 2012 (n=893)
11/20/2012
22 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What is the zip code/country of your primary residence?
Local Visitation
• Local Markets visitation was similar to two year ago
• The locals market makes up 15% of our visitation
47%
22%
20%
7%
2%
1%
1%
46%
4%
2%
2%
1%
24%
18%
0%10%20%30%40%50%
Vail
Cordillera/Edwards
Avon
Eagle
Midturn
Dotsero
Wolcott
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer 2012 (n=893)
11/20/2012
23 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What is the zip code/country of your primary residence?
Top 10 Front Range Visitation
• Front Range Markets are similar to the previous study we conducted
• Colorado Front range guests make up 25% of our visitation
17%
7%
4%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
15%
4%
4%
4%
4%
3%
2%
3%
2%
5%
5%
0%10%20%30%
Denver
Boulder
Aurora
Cenntenial
Arvada
Colorado Springs
Littleton
Highlands Ranch
Fort Collins
Parker
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer 2012 (n=893)
11/20/2012
24 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | What is the zip code/country of your primary residence?
Top 10 Country Visitation
• The Mexican and English visitors continued to grow year over year.
26%
17%
11%
6%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
24%
3%
0%
9%
3%
3%
19%
2%
3%
2%
5%
3%
0%
42%
26%
16%
5%
29%
9%
6%
19%
0%10%20%30%40%50%
Mexico
England
Canada
Germany
Australia
Brazil
Ireland
Italy
Spain
Other Foreign
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
Summer 2012 (n=35)
11/20/2012
25 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | Who are you here with:
Who are you here with?
• The number of respondents who mentioned that they are here with family (including kids) increased
(4%) from last year.
• Most results are consistent year over year.
8%
31%
30%
41%
37%
40%
8%
8%
12%
14%
16%
8%
4%
3%
26%4%
3%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
Self
Spouse/Significant Other
Family (including kids)
Friends
Family and Friends
Group
Conference
Wedding
Summer 2012 (n=958)
11/20/2012
26 Town of Vail | 11/6/12 | Would you mind telling me which one of these your household fits into?
7%
9%
12%
11%
16%
11%
12%
16%
17%
13%
15%
17%
13%
9%
10%
10%
13%
16%
13%
9%
7%
15%5%5%8%4%
0%25%50%75%100%
Summer '12
Summer '10
Summer '07
$0-$29,000
$30,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999
$75,000-$99,999
$100,000-$124,999
$125,000-$149,999
$150,000-$199,999
$200,000-$499,999
$500,000-$749,999
$750,000-$999,999
$1 million and over
Income
• The mean income of respondents has increased (+$5,000) from the respondents in 2010.
Mean=$142,005
Mean=$136,981
Mean=$207,736
Summer 2012 (n=994)
11/20/2012
Photo Credit: Jack Afflec
For questions, please contact:
Bryant Leech: Bleech@vailresorts.com or
Doug Westenskow: Dwestenskow@vailresorts.com
11/20/2012
4940 Pearl East Circle, Suite 103 • Boulder, CO 80301 • 303/449-6558 • 303/449-6587 FAX • www.rrcassoc.com
Date: November 14, 2012
To: Kelli McDonald and Sybill Navas, Town of Vail
From: Chris Cares and David Becher, RRC Associates
Re: Followup on Vail Town Council questions regarding economic impact of special events
This memo provides a brief response to several questions posed by Town Council at our meeting last
week regarding the economic impact of special events on the Town of Vail. Please note that selected
slides from our presentation have been updated in response to these issues, and those slides are
attached to this memo.
1. Snow Daze and Holidaze research still to come. We anticipate conducting survey work at Snow
Daze and Holidaze in December in order to complete the work program for this year. We will be
adding those two events to our summary reports in early January.
2. Proportion of shopping expenditures in Town of Vail which are taxable has been reduced from
95 percent to 80 percent. For purposes of estimating the sales tax impacts of “shopping
(groceries, souvenirs, clothing, gifts, etc.),” we have adjusted our economic impact model to
assume that 80 percent of such expenditures are taxable, rather than the 95 percent amount we
had assumed in our original analysis. This is based on analysis conducted by Judy Camp which
found that approximately 80 percent of reported retail store sales in Vail are taxable (with the
remaining 20 percent non-taxable as a result of being shipped out of town, particularly in the
jewelry and art categories). The updated sales tax impact estimates are reflected in an attached
slide.
3. Farmer’s Market economic impact was questioned as being too high. We have evaluated this
question in several ways. As we said at the meeting, attendance estimates are a key variable for
events in general, and Farmer’s Market is an example of an event for which attendance is
particularly difficult to quantify. Looking to the future, we believe there are various methods
that can be used to improve upon attendance estimates and we encourage the Town to put
these tools in place for future years, and especially for the largest ungated events.
In our initial analysis we had used the estimate provided by the Farmer’s Market of 140,000 or
approximately 9,333 per day if we assume visitation to be the same at all events. (It should be
noted that there are variations in attendance over the course of the 15 day Farmer’s Market
season but we do not have a means to fully address these variations at this time.) Our initial
analysis used the attendance figures provided by the Market for summer 2012, i.e. 140,000.
To put these figures into context, we can examine the four day Teva Mountain Games (summer)
event which had an estimated 43,889 attendees, or an average of approximately 11,000 per
11/20/2012
Followup on TOV Council Questions re: Special Event Study November 14, 2012
RRC Associates 2
day. Examining parking records for the Frontage Road during Teva, we find that there were422
cars parked on the road on Saturday 6/2/12 and 140 on Sunday 6/3/12.
By comparison, there were four Farmer’s Market Sundays in which parking occurred on the
Frontage Road, listed below (along with Wednesday, July 4, for reference). The analysis shows
that on Saturday the Teva Games had more parking on the Frontage Road than any Farmer’s
Market Sunday. However, the Teva Games had a lower proportion of attendees who were
overnight visitors or seasonal residents staying in Vail than did the Farmer’s Market (46%
compared to 54%). Also, TOV lodging occupancy rates were lower during Teva (53% on the
nights before each event day,) than the 15 Farmers Markets (74% on the Saturday nights before
each market day). These overnight visitor groups would typically be able to park at their lodging
/ home, and thus not necessarily add to Frontage Road parking demand at the same rate as
selected other visitor groups. Altogether, taking these items into consideration, it seems clear
that the Teva Games produced larger crowds than the Market, but not greatly different on the
peak Sundays when the Market parking also spilled onto the Frontage Road.
Teva Games Days with Parking on the Frontage Rd Cars
Saturday, June 2, 2012 422
Sunday, June 3, 2012 140
Farmer’s Market Weekends with Parking on the FR Cars
Sunday, July 1, 2012 (influenced by July 4 holiday) 238
(Wed. July 4- not Farmers Mkt-for reference) 764
Sunday, July 15, 2012 197
Sunday, July 29, 2012 271
Sunday, Sept. 2, 2012 (Labor Day weekend) 316
Based on these figures, as well as observations at a number of the Farmer’s Market Sundays, we
believe some additional reductions in attendance could be warranted which would reduce the
economic impact of the event. Specifically, we have “bracketed” the estimates for the Farmer’s
Market with a reduced attendance figure that is 25% less than the 140,000 provided by the
event – i.e. 105,000 in total, or 7,000 per market. We would consider this a lower, more
conservative estimate of attendance and economic impact. Based on this adjustment, the total
economic impact of the Farmer’s Market would decline from the original estimate of $24.5
million to $18.4 million, still a very substantial figure.
4. Inclusion of ticket admission fees at selected events. Based on an examination of the survey
responses, it appears that event admission fees were likely excluded from respondents’
estimates of spending for Bravo, the International Dance Festival (IDF), Colorado Grand
(participants), and the Soul Music Festival. We have updated the economic impact analysis to
include aggregate ticket revenues for each of these events. Note that the estimates of
economic impact associated with ticket revenue are adjusted to exclude estimated spending by
TOV full-time residents, and are also adjusted for the importance of the event in driving the
decision to visit Vail (among non-TOV residents). (Economic impact associated with other
attendee spending – on restaurants, lodging, etc. – are also adjusted the same way.)
11/20/2012
Followup on TOV Council Questions re: Special Event Study November 14, 2012
RRC Associates 3
Taking these adjustments into account, economic impact associated with Bravo is estimated to
increase from approximately $3.8 million in the original analysis to $4.7 million in the updated
analysis. For IDF, economic impact increases from approximately $2.1 million to $2.4 million.
For the Soul Festival, economic impact increases from approximately $171,000 to $200,000; and
for Colorado Grand, economic impact increases from approximately $169,000 to $193,000.
5. Updated presentation slides. Attached to this memo are updated slides from the economic
impact analysis. Updated slides include the following:
• Slide 15, aggregate economic impact: Adjusted to reflect ticket admission fees at selected
events. Additionally, the slide also shows the impact if Farmers Market attendance is 25
percent lower than the 140,000 reported (i.e. 105,000).
• Slide 16, aggregate economic impact by sector: Adjusted to reflect ticket admission fees at
selected events (included in “other” category). Assumes Farmers Market attendance is
140,000.
• Slide 17, aggregate TOV sales tax collections: Adjusted to reflect shopping expenditures at
80% taxable rate instead of 95%. Also adjusted to reflect “other” expenditures at 20%
taxable rate instead of 25% (to reflect inclusion of ticket admission fees in “other” category,
and controlling for fact that subject admission fees are not taxable).
• Slide 18, payback ratios: Adjusted to reflect adjustments noted in slides 15, 16 and 17.
• Slide 21, per capita daily spending in Vail, by event: Adjusted for Bravo, IDF, Soul Music
Festival, and Colorado Grand to reflect assumed ticket expenditures (per point 4 above).
• Slide 24, economic impact, by event: Adjusted for Bravo, IDF, Soul Music Festival, and
Colorado Grand to reflect assumed admission expenditures. Also, high and low Farmer’s
Market impacts are shown.
11/20/2012
Economic Impact of Special Events 2012
AGGREGATE RESULTS: Economic Impact
15 Town of Vail | Economic Development Office | 11/13/12
Aggregate Economic Impact for 28 Events
Summary calculation method:
546,413Attendance (i.e. visitor days) at 28 events
$136.85* Per capita daily economic impact (adjusted for importance of event & TOV overnt stays beyond event timeframe)
$74,776,214= Direct economic impact
Note: Impact assumes 140,000 Farmers Market attendance. Impact would be $68.7 million at 105,000 Farmers Market attendance.
Note: Secondary/"multiplier" economic impacts (from indirect and induced effects) are excluded.
11/20/2012
Economic Impact of Special Events 2012
AGGREGATE RESULTS: Economic Impact – by Sector
16 Town of Vail | Economic Development Office | 11/13/12
Aggregate Economic Impact for 28 Events - by Sector
Breakout by sector:
$33,191,314Restaurants/bars/food concessions
$17,106,379Shopping (groceries, souvenirs, clothing, gifts, etc.)
$7,928,627Recreation (race entry fees, golf, bike rental, skiing, etc.)
$10,713,381Lodging
$5,828,274Other (gas, parking, movie, admission fees, etc.)
$74,767,975Direct economic impact
Note: Impact assumes 140,000 Farmers Market attendance.
Note: Secondary/"multiplier" economic impacts (from indirect and induced effects) are excluded.
11/20/2012
Economic Impact of Special Events 2012
AGGREGATE RESULTS: Economic Impact – Sales Tax
17 Town of Vail | Economic Development Office | 11/13/12
Aggregate TOV Sales Tax Collections (4% rate) - Attributable to 28 Events
Approximate sales tax collections:
$1,194,887Restaurants/bars/food concessions: assume 90% taxable (e.g. exclude tips)
$547,404Shopping: assume 80% taxable
$158,573Recreation: assume 50% taxable
$428,535Lodging: assume 100% taxable
$46,626Other (gas, parking, movie, admission fees, etc.): assume 20% taxable
$2,376,025Total sales tax collections
Note: Impact assumes 140,000 Farmers Market attendance.
Note: Sales taxes associated with secondary/"multiplier" economic impacts are excluded.
11/20/2012
Economic Impact of Special Events 2012
AGGREGATE RESULTS: Economic Impact – ROI
18 Town of Vail | Economic Development Office | 11/13/12
Return on Investment Ratios - Attributable to 28 Events
Ratio of direct economic impact to event funding received:
$74,767,975Event economic impact
$1,058,506Event funding provided by CSE/VLMD/Council
$70.64Payback ratio (incremental community economic impact per dollar of event funding)
Ratio of direct sales tax impact to event funding received:
$2,376,025Sales tax collections
$1,058,506Event funding provided by CSE/VLMD/Council
$2.24Payback ratio (incremental TOV sales tax revenue per dollar of event funding)
Note: Impact assumes 140,000 Farmers Market attendance.
Note: Secondary economic and sales tax impacts (from indirect and induced effects) are excluded from estimates.
11/20/2012
Economic Impact of Special Events 2012
INDIVIDUAL EVENT RESULTS – Per Capita Daily Spending
21 Town of Vail | Economic Development Office | 11/13/12
$322
$271
$251$242$235
$215
$192$185$179$178$177$175$165$159$152$144$142
$125$122$118$116$112$104$100$95$89
$66
$50
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Spending for Yourself Only Today and Tonight in Vail
Total amount you will spend today and tonight in TOV*
Mean
*TOV full-timeand seasonal residents: spending during the event timeframe only.
Overall average=$159
11/20/2012
Economic Impact of Special Events 2012
INDIVIDUAL EVENT RESULTS – Direct Economic Impact
24 Town of Vail | Economic Development Office | 11/13/12
$9,753,684
$4,810,241$4,652,096$3,782,510$3,477,141$2,494,186$2,303,108$2,302,310
$2,295,335$2,175,019$2,057,006$1,991,960$1,489,106$1,371,981$1,195,080$775,288$689,542$675,670$617,486$497,183$272,179$200,464$192,942$142,716$59,460$32,330
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000
Direct Economic Impact
Estimated direct economic impact to TOV
Overall average=$2.7 million
Farmers Market: $24.5M
@ 25% less attendees: $18.4M
11/20/2012
November 11, 2012
The September Vail Business Review breaks down the four percent sales tax collected for
September and year to date through third quarter.
Overall September sales tax increased 6.6% with Retail decreasing 6.3%, Lodging increased
33.1%, Food and Beverage increased 10.3% and Utilities/Other (which is mainly utilities but also
includes taxable services and rentals) decreased .1%. The Out of Town category continues to be
greatly affected by interior design firms and furniture stores delivering in to Vail. Excluding the Out
of Town category, sales tax for the month of September is up 13.7%.
Year to date through third quarter resulted in a 3.8% increase overall with Retail increasing .8%,
Lodging increased 8.1%, Food and Beverage increased 8.3% and Utilities decreased 10.4%.
Excluding the Out of Town category, sales tax year to date through third quarter is up 6.2%.
Town of Vail sales tax forms, the Vail Business Review and the sales tax worksheet are available
on www.vailgov.com. You can subscribe to have the Vail Business Review and the sales tax
worksheet e-mailed to you automatically from www.vailgov.com.
Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax
collections, as opposed to actual gross sales.
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125 or Judy
Camp at (970) 479-2119.
Sincerely,
Sally Lorton
Sales Tax Administrator
SEPTEMBER 2012
VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW
11/20/2012
September 2012 Sales Tax
VAIL VILLAGE
September September September
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 114,944 122,037 6.2%
Lodging 79,006 103,962 31.6%
Food &
Beverage 170,738 192,314 12.6%
Other 1,331 9,036 578.9%
Total 366,019 427,349 16.8%
LIONSHEAD
September September September
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
.
Retail 33,337 29,825 -10.5%
Lodging 41,068 61,490 49.7%
Food &
Beverage 44,912 54,056 20.4%
Other 3,497 4,034 15.4%
Total 122,814 149,405 21.7%
11/20/2012
September 2012 Sales Tax
CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIL/SANDSTONE/WEST VAIL
September September September
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 108,441 111,335 2.7%
Lodging 37,453 45,008 20.2%
Food &
Beverage 41,670 37,243 -10.6%
Other 9,406 9,579 1.8%
Total 196,970 203,165 3.1%
OUT OF TOWN
September September September
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 78,318 50,781 -35.2%
Lodging 4,060 4,575 12.7%
Food &
Beverage 963 1,287 33.6%
Utilities & 121,239 112,652 -7.1%
Other
Total 204,580 169,295 -17.2%
11/20/2012
September 2012 Sales Tax
TOTAL
September September September
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 335,040 313,978 -6.3%
Lodging 161,587 215,035 33.1%
Food &
Beverage 258,283 284,900 10.3%
Utilities & 135,473 135,301 -0.1%
Other
Total 890,383 949,214 6.6%
11/20/2012
RETAIL SUMMARY
September September September
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
FOOD 80,502 85,670 6.4%
LIQUOR 23,005 23,646 2.8%
APPAREL 45,050 46,388 3.0%
SPORT 61,950 62,630 1.1%
JEWELRY 19,006 15,650 -17.7%
GIFT 6,144 6,513 6.0%
GALLERY 3,918 3,421 -12.7%
OTHER 95,008 69,557 -26.8%
HOME
OCCUPATION
457 503 10.1%
TOTAL 335,040 313,978
-6.3%
11/20/2012
YTD 3rd Quarter 2012
VAIL VILLAGE
YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 1,985,239 2,105,512 6.1%
Lodging 2,207,089 2,488,005 12.7%
Food &
Beverage 2,502,559 2,753,732 10.0%
Other 62,919 84,212 33.8%
Total 6,757,806 7,431,461 10.0%
LIONSHEAD
YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
.
Retail 911,098 864,617 -5.1%
Lodging 1,626,818 1,698,950 4.4%
Food &
Beverage 735,762 794,287 8.0%
Other 43,589 45,278 3.9%
Total 3,317,267 3,403,132 2.6%
11/20/2012
YTD 3rd Quarter 2012
CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIL/SANDSTONE/WEST VAIL
YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 1,344,292 1,354,450 0.8%
Lodging 870,187 901,911 3.6%
Food &
Beverage 492,929 493,477 0.1%
Other 54,718 54,367 -0.6%
Total 2,762,126 2,804,205 1.5%
OUT OF TOWN
YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 485,885 439,660 -9.5%
Lodging 166,310 176,876 6.4%
Food &
Beverage 9,714 10,707 10.2%
Utilities & 1,491,881 1,298,062 -13.0%
Other
Total 2,153,790 1,925,305 -10.6%
11/20/2012
YTD 3rd Quarter 2012
TOTAL
YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
Retail 4,726,514 4,764,239 0.8%
Lodging 4,870,404 5,265,742 8.1%
Food &
Beverage 3,740,964 4,052,203 8.3%
Utilities & 1,653,107 1,481,919 -10.4%
Other
Total 14,990,989 15,564,103 3.8%
11/20/2012
RETAIL SUMMARY
YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr YTD 3rd Qtr
2011 2012 %
Collections Collections Change
FOOD 991,458 1,009,971 1.9%
LIQUOR 316,662 339,677 7.3%
APPAREL 609,283 675,642 10.9%
SPORT 1,790,186 1,751,938 -2.1%
JEWELRY 174,263 154,532 -11.3%
GIFT 74,035 63,785 -13.8%
GALLERY 44,931 50,033 11.4%
OTHER 721,285
714,558 -.9%
HOME
OCCUPATION
4,411
4,103 -7.0%
TOTAL 4,726,514 4,764,239 .8%
11/20/2012
460
841
967
1329
1309
620
132 6
17301645
240
1315
720
1028
1082
1660
1720
500
1067
1278
700
580
442
458
1190
1299
434
600
1289
1630
914
1229
1650
1085
530
540
1058
600
1179
990
1775
971
950
930
1012
925
1054
1785
1150
1136
1620
353
434
461
416
1314
1183
1592
1297
1280
975
345
365
1655
1578
1557 1738
433
998
595
14571 417
352
365
413
375
1397
1195
1127
967
1377
386
1487
342
992
994
910 920
395
356 1307
996
1220
335
385304
400
1250
1193
965
1628
970
362
1548
1014
1538
384
1287
1191
1119 1170
332
392
1027 1067
1157
1022
385
312
598
315
1184
1017
15371 163
1187
15881 045
1614
1635
1388 1468
1328
1055 1517
1034
1517
1125
360
1100
1044
366 1358
3051109
1042
141810 31
1130
1115
151810 50
1610
1710
1801
1568
302
303
1558
362
1734
1007
1547
1001
1498
1200
1670
955
15981448
621
1626
1367483
355
430
935
1337
1153
1527
1106
420
434
371
375
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, iPC, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), and the GIS UserCommunity
05001,000250 Feet This map was created by the Town of Vail GIS Team. Use of this map should be for general purposes only.The Town of Vail does not warrant the accuracy of the information contained herein.(where shown, parcel line work is approximate)
Count
1234 - 5 10
Accidents on Vail Valley Drive: Jan. 1, 2012 - Oct. 31, 2012
I 11/20/2012
Case #DateTimeAddressRoad CondWeatherHarmful Event2010000074 07-Jan-101704458 VAIL VALLEY DR
IcyNoneCollision with Parked Vehicle
2010000125 09-Jan-1010001468 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision Rear to Rear
2010000226 24-Jan-101450 VAIL VALLEY DR / E MEADOW DR
IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Side to Side Opp Dir
2010000401 13-Feb-101533 GORE CREEK DR / VAIL VALLEY DR
IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Front to Rear
2010000453 19-Feb-101633 GORE CREEK DR / VAIL VALLEY DR
IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Front to Rear
2010000707 21-Mar-101436458 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Curb
2010000708 21-Mar-102150400 VAIL VALLEY DR
WetNoneCollision with Lg Rocks/Boulders
2010000711 21-Mar-102140595 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Wall or Bldg
2010000752 27-Mar-1011581778 VAIL VALLEY DR
SnowySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Front to Front
2010000773 29-Mar-101000458 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision Side to Side Same Dir
2010001541 22-Sep-101411620 VAIL VALLEY DR
WetNoneCollision Rear to Front
2010001760 16-Nov-1023301287 VAIL VALLEY DR
SnowySnow/Sleet/HailCollision with Other Obj
2010001806 24-Nov-101701 E MEADOW DR / VAIL VALLEY DR
IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision with Lg Rocks/Boulders
2010001825 27-Nov-101628598 VAIL VALLEY DR
WetNoneCollision Rear to Side
2010001914 11-Dec-100818400 VAIL VALLEY DR
IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Front to Side
2010001999 18-Dec-101350 E MEADOW DR / VAIL VALLEY DR
IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Front to Side
2010002031 21-Dec-100900458 VAIL VALLEY DR
SlushySnow/Sleet/HailCollision with Parked Vehicle
2010002040 22-Dec-100847 VAIL VALLEY DR / E MEADOW DR
IcyNoneCollision Front to Rear
2010002099 28-Dec-101338458 VAIL VALLEY DR
treatmentNoneCollision Front to Side
2011000155 17-Jan-110950458 VAIL VALLEY DR
IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Front to Rear
2011000413 17-Feb-110929458 VAIL VALLEY DR
SnowySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Side to Side Opp Dir
2011000422 17-Feb-111650
MILL CREEK CIR / VAIL VALLEY DR IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Side to Side Opp Dir
2011000478 23-Feb-111634
VAIL VALLEY DR / PULIS BRIDGE
IcyNoneCollision Front to Front
2011000491 25-Feb-111624
620 VAIL VALLEY DR IcyNoneCollision Front to Side
2011000589 08-Mar-110755
458 VAIL VALLEY DR
SnowySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Side to Side Same Dir
2011000590 08-Mar-110811
458 VAIL VALLEY DR IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision with Light/Util Pole
2011000639 13-Mar-110758
VAIL VALLEY DR / S FRONTAGE RD IcySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Side to Side Opp Dir
2011000820 04-Apr-111642
GORE CREEK DR / VAIL VALLEY DR DryNoneCollision with Other Fixed Obj
2011001256 05-Jul-110825
400 VAIL VALLEY DR DryNoneCollision with Bicycle
2011001682 25-Sep-110828352 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Other Fixed Obj
2011001930 27-Nov-111200620 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Hwy Barrier
201100121227-Jun-11914395 GORE CRK DR/VAIL VALLEY D
RDryNoneCollision Rear to Front
2011002012 14-Dec-110831
362 VAIL VALLEY DR
SnowySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Front to RearMotor Vehicle Accidents on Vail Valley Drive: 01.01.10 - 10.31.12
Total Count of Accidents on Vail Valley Drive in 2010: 19Total Count of Accidents on Vail Valley Drive in 2011: 14
11/20/2012
2012000064 07-Jan-121033 E MEADOW DR / VAIL VALLEY DR
SnowySnow/Sleet/HailCollision Side to Side Opp Dir
2012000184 21-Jan-121949 CHALET RD / VAIL VALLEY DR
SnowySnow/Sleet/HailCollision with Traff Signal Pol
e
2012000201 23-Jan-120818 CHALET RD / VAIL VALLEY DR
IcyNoneCollision with Sign
2012000233 26-Jan-121700595 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Parked Vehicle
2012000470 27-Feb-120755620 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Other Fixed Obj
2012000738 05-Apr-121328350 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Other Obj
2012000960 02-Jun-120950458 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision Side to Side Same Dir
2012001465 30-Aug-121218600 VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision Side to Side Same Dir
2012001650 09-Oct-121550 HANSON RANCH RD /
VAIL VALLEY DR
DryNoneCollision with Light/Util Pole
Total Count of Accidents on Vail Valley Drive in 2012 YTD: 9
11/20/2012
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2012
ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor and Council
11/20/2012
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2012
ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(a)(b)(e) - to discuss
the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of property interests; to receive legal advice
on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct
negotiators, Re: Discussion concerning negotiations regarding Municipal Site Redevelopment;
2) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to
determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Regarding: update on
pending litigation.
PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire
11/20/2012
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2012
ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (4:05 p.m.)
NOTE: UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW (ALL ARE APPROXIMATE DATES
AND TIMES AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
--------------------
THE NEXT REGULAR VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT
APPROXIMATELY 12:30 P.M. (or TBD), TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2012 IN THE VAIL
TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Ongoing agenda items TBD: DRB/PEC updates - Warren - WS - 15 min.; Information
Updates Attachments: WS - 15 min.; Executive Session items: 30 min.; Consent Agenda: 5
min.; Town Manager Report: 5 min.
CIRSA board training for TC/PEC - Tami Tanoue/Matt Mire - WS - 60 min. - 12/4
Comcast Franchise Agreement approval - Matt M. - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
1st reading 3rd supplemental to 2012 budget - Kathleen - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
2nd reading Ord #16; 2013 budget ordinance - Kathleen - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
2nd reading of Ord #17; Mil Levy certification - Kathleen - ES - 5 min. - 12/4
2nd reading of Ord #19; Streamtract Zoning Regs - Restoration - George - ES - 10 min. - 12/4
ERWSD Vail golf course easements - Todd Fessenden - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
Resolution No. 35, Ever Vail Preliminary Plan approval - George/Warren - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
CSE Allocations Approval and Mission Statement - Kelli - ES - 15 min. - 12/4
First Reading Vail Golf Course Rezoning - Bill G - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
First Reading Vail Golf Course Text Amendments - Bill G - ES - 30 min. - 12/4
ERWSD Wastewater Management Plan - Diane Johnson?/Tom K - WS - 30 min. - 12/18
Second Reading Vail Golf Course Rezoning - Bill G - ES - 30 min. - 12/18
Second Reading Vail Golf Course Text Amendments - Bill G - ES - 30 min. - 12/18
2nd reading 3rd supplemental to 2012 budget - Kathleen - ES - 30 min. - 12/18
Vail Village Info Center - Suzanne S - WS - 30 min. - 12/18
Citizen Award Dan T. - Daric Harvey/Mark Miller - ES - 5 min. - 12/4 or 12/18
1st reading of Charter Split Ordinance - Matt Mire - ES - 1/8/13
Site Visit - Vail Library - Pam Brandmeyer - 30 min. - WS - 2/13/13
Buy-down program funding discussion - Nina - WS - 30 min. - TBD
Strategic Parking Plan discussion - Greg H. - WS - 30 min. - TBD
Recycling discussion - Kristen B - 30 min. - WS - TBD
Housing Fee in Lieu Discussion – TBD
Ford Park discussion re: noise - Todd O./Greg Hall - WS - 30 min. - TBD
Outdoor Display Goods - George Ruther - TBD
Sister City discussion - TBD
Open Space Discussion with Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space Director - TBD
Award Contract for Community Development IT Software- George Ruther - ES - TBD
11/20/2012