The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-03-19 Agenda and Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 10:30 A.M., MARCH 19, 2013 NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. Public comments on work session item may be solicited by the Town Council. 1. ITEM/TOPIC: DRB/PEC Update (10 min.) PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell 2. ITEM/TOPIC: Council interviews for appointments to the Art in Public Places (AIPP); Building and Fire Codes Appeals Board (B&FCAB); Design Review Board (DRB); and Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). (50 min.) PRESENTER(S): Pam Brandmeyer ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Staff requests each applicant be interviewed at the work session and appoint 3 members to the AIPP; 1 member and 2 alternates to the B&FCAB; 2 members to the DRB; and 3 members to the PEC at the evening meeting. Staff has provided possible questions to ask applicants and an attendance record for current members for Council review and use. The terms for vacancies for AIPP, DRB, and PEC are for two years, April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2015. The term for the B&FCAB is for five years, April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: The Town recieved ten letters of interest for the open positions on AIPP, BF&FCAB, DRB and PEC as follows (incumbent members are asterisked): AIPP: Jennifer Mason * B&FCAB: Kathy Langenwalter*; Beth Levine; Mark Donaldson; Mark Hallenbeck DRB: Brian Gillette *;Tom Du Bois * PEC: Michael Kurz *; Luke Cartin *; Pamela Hopkins* STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Council interview each applicant at the work session and appoint three members to the AIPP; one member and two alternate members to BF&CAB; two members to DRB; and three members to the PEC at the evening meeting. 3. ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b) - to receive legal advice on specific legal questions, Regarding: Council process; 2) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Regarding: Pending litigation; 3) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(f) - to 3/19/2013 discuss personnel matters, Regarding: Council direct reports. (45 min.) PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire 4. ITEM/TOPIC: Evolving Vail: Jeff Winston, of MIG Winston, will give a presentation on how Vail has changed, yet largely stayed the same, over the past 30 years through the application of the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines. (60 min.) PRESENTER(S): Jeff Winston 5. ITEM/TOPIC: The purpose of this work session is to update the Vail Town Council on the progress of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project. The Vail Village Character Area Preservation project is reviewing the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan to address the following problem statement: As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur to the physical features of Vail Village, are the town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. (45 min.) PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell Tom Braun, Braun Associates ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council is asked to listen to the presentation, ask questions, and provide feedback regarding the comments heard from the public and the Planning and Environmental Commission. BACKGROUND: On November 20, 2012, the Vail Town Council directed staff and Tom Braun, Braun Associates, to proceed forward with the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project. On February 7, 2013, several focus group meetings were held with various stakeholders in the Vail Village. Comments from those focus groups can be found in the attached Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum dated March 11, 2013. On February 11 and March 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission were introduced to the project and began discussing elements of the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Design Guide Plan that may need to be addressed in order to ensure redevelopment is achieving the desired results. 6. ITEM/TOPIC: Ford Park Master Plan and Management Plan Public Discussion. Public input will be heard in the evening (Item #4). (60 min. ) PRESENTER(S): George Ruther ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Does the Vail Town Council have concerns with the direction recommended for Ford Park based upon the existing planning documents (1985 Master Plan, 1997 Management Plan, 2012 Management Plan Amendment)? If so, what are the concerns of the Town Council and why are they of concern? Based upon the Town Council’s responses to the first two questions, which of the three options should be pursued in moving forward? 3/19/2013 BACKGROUND: On March 5, 2013, the Vail Town Council moved to temporarily withdraw its consent, as the owner of the Ford Park property, to allow the proposed Phase II improvements to proceed through the development review process. In doing so, the Town Council requested an opportunity to visit Ford Park on March 19th to more fully understand any impacts that the Phase I improvements, which are currently under construction, may have on the proposed Phase II improvements. The Town Council also asked town staff to request that the applicants (BFAG, VVF, VRD, ToV) request a tabling of the development application to the April 8th public hearing of the PEC. On March 11th, the PEC tabled final action on the development application to the April 8, 2013 public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The town staff recommends the Vail Town Council first provides answers to the questions posed in the staff memorandum, dated March 19, 2013. The answers to these questions will aid in determining whether the development applications should proceed forward as currently proposed or whether further amendments to the Master Plan and Management Plan are required. 7. ITEM/TOPIC: Information Updates and Attachments: 1) CSE March 6, 2013 Draft Minutes (5 min.) 8. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor and Council (15 min. ) 9. ITEM/TOPIC: Ford Park Phase I Site Visit (60 min. ) 10. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (4:15 p.m.) NOTE: UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW (ALL ARE APPROXIMATE DATES AND TIMES AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) -------------------- THE NEXT REGULAR VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 12:30 P.M. (or TBD), TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2013 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Ongoing agenda items TBD: DRB/PEC updates - Warren - WS - 15 min.; Information Updates Attachments: WS - 15 min.; Executive Session items: 30 min.; Consent Agenda: 5 min.; Town Manager Report: 5 min. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: History of Development in Vail - Jeff Winston - WS - 60 min. - 3/19 TOV Official Vehicle Sponsorship- Stan Z - WS - 30 min. - 3/19 Vail Village Character Area Preservation Update- Tom Braun and Warren Campbell - ES - 30 min. - 3/19 1st Reading of Ord 6, 1st Supplemental to 2013 Budget - Kathleen - ES - 30 min - 3/19 DRB, PEC, AIPP, BFCAB vacancy interviews - 30 min. - WS - 3/19 Joint VRD Meeting - economic study - Stan - WS - 60 min. 3/19 DRB, PEC, AIPP, BFCAB appointments - 20 min. - ES - 3/19 Parking Structures systems discussion - 3/19 Town Managers Report - 1) "i" Sign Options and Direction - 3/19 2nd Reading of Ord 6, 1st Supplemental of 2013 Budget - Kathleen - ES - 10 min. - 4/2 Eagle County Commissioner Joint Meeting - 60 min. - 4/02 Vail Community Wide Recycling Ordinance(moved from 3.19.13) Kristen 3/19/2013 Bertuglia WS - 4/2 VLMD Meeting: Health and Well Being - Adam Sutner - 30 min. - WS - 4/2 VLMDAC vacancy - WS - 10 min. ES - 5 min. - 4/2 Community wide recycling - Kristen Bertuglia -WS - 30 min 4/2 Twin Tunnels Construction Update - Margaret Bowes, CDOT - ES - 30 min. - 4/2 Healthcare Reform Act discussion - Stan/Krista - WS - 30 min. 4/2 Council Countribution Criteria - Judy/Kathleen - WS- 4/16 Approval of contractor for operational management of Vail Welcome Center & Host Program - Suzanne - ES - 6/18 Gore Creek Public Sign Campaign - George - WS - 20 min. - TBD Sign Code/Sponsor Vehicle Location - George - WS - 15 min. - TBD ERWSD easements - Todd Fessenden - ES - 30 min. - TBD 1st reading of Ord #1 - Charter Split - Matt M - ES - 30 min. - TBD EPS Economic Study of Vail Golf Course - Greg Hall - WS - 30 min. - TBD ROI Document Presentation - Adam Sutner - WS - 20 min. - TBD EHU Housing Authority - TBD 2015 WAC construction restrictions discussion - George - WS - 30 min. - TBD VVMC/TOV discussion on MOB - Doris Kirschner, VVMC - ES - 30 min. - TBD Strategic Parking Plan discussion - Greg H. - WS - 30 min. - TBD Sister City discussion - TBD Open Space Discussion with Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space Director - TBD Discussion of future of RSES - TBD Streaming PEC & DRB - TBD 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: DRB/PEC Update PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell ATTACHMENTS: DRB Results March 6, 2013 PEC Results March 11, 2013 3/19/2013 Page 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA PUBLIC MEETING March 6, 2013 Council Chambers 75 South Frontage Road West - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Tom DuBois Brian Gillette Andy Forstl Rollie Kjesbo Libby Maio PROJECT ORIENTATION 1:00pm SITE VISITS 1. Betteridge/Gotthelf Residence- 100 East Meadow Drive, Units 27 & 28 2. Tivoli Lodge- 386 Hanson Ranch Road 3. Vail Valley Medical Center - 181 West Meadow Drive 4. Scheerly/ Bolyard Residence - 133 Willow Place 5. Lodge at Vail - 174 Gore Creek Drive MAIN AGENDA 3:00pm 1. Dobyns Residence DRB130034 / 10 minutes Warren Final review of changes to approved plans (windows and siding) 3080 Booth Falls Road/Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 12 Applicant: Pete Dobyns, represented by Millie Aldrich ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 4-1-0 (Maio opposed) 2. Vail Valley Medical Center DRB130031 / 10 minutes Warren Final review of new construction (valet booth) 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E&F, Vail Village Filing 2 Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Ryan Magill ACTION: Approved MOTION: Gillette SECOND: Forstl VOTE: 5-0-0 3. Ruttum Residence DRB130024/ 15 minutes Rachel Final review of new construction (single family with EHU) 1388 Briar Patch Lane/Residences at Briar Patch Condos Applicant: David Ruttum, represented by David Irwin ACTION: Tabled to March 20, 2013 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Maio VOTE: 5-0-0 4. Williams Residence DRB130015 / 10 minutes Rachel Final review of changes to approved plans (doors, windows, roof) 302 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Margaret P. Williams represented by Pam Hopkins ACTION: Tabled to March 20, 2013 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Maio VOTE: 5-0-0 3/19/2013 Page 2 5. Betteridge/ Gotthelf Residence DRB130027/ 15 minutes Rachel Final review of an addition (bedroom, living room, kitchen) 100 East Meadow Drive Units 27 & 28/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Terry Betteridge and Paul Gotthelf, represented by Mark Donaldson ACTION: Tabled to March 20, 213 MOTION: Maio SECOND: Forstl VOTE: 4-0-1 (DuBois recused) 6. Tivoli Lodge DRB130040/ 15 minutes Rachel Final review of an addition (office, meeting space, dormers) 386 Hansen Ranch Road/Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 5 Applicant: Robert T. Lazier, represented by William Reslock Architect ACTION: Approved with conditions MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Maio VOTE: 5-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1. The applicant shall inset the sliding doors and railings into the façade in order to make the adjacent shutters appear functional. This shall be depicted on the plans submitted for building permit review. 7. Scheerly/ Bolyard Residence DRB130045 / 15 minutes Rachel Final review of an addition (living room, bedroom) 133 Willow Place (Riva Ridge South)/ Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: PK Scheerly and Bruce Bolyard, represented by Suman Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Forstl VOTE: 3-2-0 (Gillette, Maio opposed) 8. Lodge at Vail DRB130032 15 minutes Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (pool area/landscape changes) 174 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A,B,C, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Lodge Properties Inc, represented by Brandt Marott ACTION: Tabled to March 20, 2013 MOTION: Maio SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE: 5-0-0 9. Ford Park Athletic Fields DRB130042 / 15 minutes Rachel Final review of changes to approved plans (synthetic surface) 530 South Frontage Road East/unplatted Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Forstl VOTE: 3-2-0 (Maio, Gillette opposed) STAFF APPROVALS Bainbridge Residence DRB130020 Warren Final review of changes to approved plans (windows) 1116 Sandstone Drive Unit 701/Lot A5-1, Block A, Lion’s Ridge Filing 1 Applicant: Michelle and Louis Bainbridge, represented by Jason Morley Odum Residence DRB130028 Rachel Final review of an addition (bay window) 4254 Columbine Way Unit 9/ Bighorn Terrace Applicant: Johnnie and Deb Odum, represented by Rodney Molitor The Chalets at the Lodge at Vail DRB130030 Rachel Final review of a minor exterior alteration (chimney cap) 151 Vail Lane/Lot 1&2, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: The Chalets at the Lodge at Vail HOA, represented by Charley Viola 3/19/2013 Page 3 Deighan Residence DRB130033 Warren Final review of changes to approved plans (door) 2572 Cortina Lane/Lot 3, Block F, Vail Das Schone Filing 1 Applicant: Robin L. Deighan, represented by Sarah Wyscarver STAFF DENIALS Hernandez Residence DRB130022 Rachel Final review of changes to approved plans (roof) 1416 Moraine Drive/Lot 8, Block 2, Dauphinais-Mosely Filing 1 Applicant: Job and Ana Paula Hernandez, represented by Brian Gillette The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner’s office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 3/19/2013 Page 1 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION March 11, 2013 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Bill Pierce Pam Hopkins Henry Pratt Luke Cartin Michael Kurz Susan Bird John Rediker 1. A request for the review of a variance from Section 12-7B-15, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of additions in excess of the prescribed site coverage; and a request for the review of a major exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12-7B-7, Exterior Alterations and Modifications, Vail Town Code, to the allow for the construction of additions, located at 225 Wall Street/ Lot B, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130008, PEC130009) Applicant: Wall Street Commercial, LLC, represented by Suman Architects Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to March 25, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 6-0-0 2. A request for a work session to discuss the Vail Village Character Study, an initiative to examine the Town’s current regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village to determine whether they are sufficient to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell Warren Campbell gave a presentation focused on the steps taken thus far on the project and the goals of public hearing. Tom Braun gave a presentation per a power point. He spoke to each slide’s topic with the goal of obtaining feedback from the Commission. Landmarks: Tom Braun spoke to what the focus groups identified as landmarks. The groups identified the Covered Bridge, the Gorsuch Clock Tower, public plaza spaces, and pedestrian streets. The power point included several questions about the current ownership and protection of the public spaces and plaza. Commissioner Kurz spoke to the previous applications for development on the south side of the Village parking structure and the Gorsuch clock tower redevelopment proposal. He questioned whether landmark status should be applied to the identified features as they may not be timeless. He believes the curve in the street, layout of the town, and the environment around the town is timeless. Roof forms will change; architecture will change through redevelopment, etc. 3/19/2013 Page 2 He spoke to the interpretation that occurs when evaluating compliance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines. Commissioner Pierce spoke to the Wildflower (Elway’s) walkway between the Lodge at Vail and the Wall Street Building. He spoke to the benefits if the west side of the Wall Street Building were to open up onto the existing walkway. He added that Meadow Drive has become too wide. Commissioner Cartin spoke to the fact that as the town continues to develop a four season economy there is needed improvement on the incorporation of landscaping throughout the Village. He recognized landscaping will need to take into account cyclist flow and special events such as farmers market. The existing landscaping seems piecemeal. Commissioner Pierce believes there is a need to create a logical comprehensive plan for landscaping including trees in the Village. There needs to be a compromise to balance the location of trees and retail store fronts. Commissioner Bird stated that she felt that the Vail Interfaith Chapel should be considered a landmark and worth preserving. Commissioner Cartin spoke to the Vail Rowhouses which allows for a difference in development style and interest in the Village. Gorsuch clock tower: Tom Braun spoke to the discussion around the clock tower. Is the tower itself important or the architecture of the tower that is important? Commissioner Bird spoke to Jeff Winston’s presentation and his highlighting of the importance of stucco. Commissioner Pratt spoke to the clock tower not being of architectural interest, but it is the location of the tower at the intersection at the center of town. Some significant vertical element needs to be there and represents Vail. It should not be all glass and stone. He suggested the tower needs to be taller in the future. Commissioner Cartin spoke to the tower’s simplicity as being what is special. Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowners, suggested going to Google to find images of Vail to see what the world thinks is special about Vail. He felt it would be a barometer of what others think is special. He added that we locals get tired of things and want to see change, but it is the consumer/guest that tells us what we need to provide. Currently, the Latin culture is coming to Vail. As we are considering changes maybe we should focus on Barcelona verses Zermat. He added that we are struggling to recognize that Vail is a city. The market and the human soul are saying the Village is not broken, and there is no need to make significant changes. He spoke to the need to evaluate any proposal and change with regard to the ability to park the proposal. He feels that the clock tower is important and how it gets remade is a very important issue and how do you keep the corridors open around the Village in order to view the clock tower. He looks at landmarks more so as the bus stop with the children’s art, the berm on the south side of the Village Parking structure, Children’s Fountain, etc. Commissioner Kurz stated that he is aware Vail is a city, but he believes this task is an examination of how to keep a unique Village core protected. He spoke to the plaza east of 3/19/2013 Page 3 Campo DiFiori and the ability to redesign and redevelop the plaza to continue the character of the Village core onto Meadow Drive. Commissioner Rediker spoke to his belief that the simplicity of the clock tower is what is special. He spoke to a concern about going to far in the imposition of the requirement for a tower on a specific property. Commissioner Bird spoke to other communities which regulate architectural design and features. Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan (UDGP) Applicability: Tom Braun spoke to the current applicability of the UDGP. He added that the focus groups spoke to the expansion of the UDGP to the greater Village. Commissioner Kurz spoke to the successes of the Austria Haus and Sonnenalp redevelopments and the benefits of expanding the UDGP application. Commissioner Pratt spoke to a need to expand the UDGP east to include Manor Vail. He spoke to how the implementation of the UDGP, or version thereof, would help to tie it all together. Commissioner Pierce spoke to conversations on how to improve the pedestrian experience from the Village to Ford Park. It was suggested that tying the Village to Golden Peak to a greater degree. Can there be a retail link created? Is there an ability to expand our retail shopping experience? Include an art walk? Jim Lamont spoke to the conversation in conjunction with Ever Vail about how to connect Lionshead to Ever Vail along West Lionshead Circle through the incorporation of retail. The discussion focused on making the pedestrian experience more interesting verse the sterility that is currently present. The area to the east of the Village core is missing pedestrianization to make it feel like a part of the Village core. Non-conforming properties: Tom Braun identified several properties which exceed their development allowance (height, site coverage). How do these properties redevelop? Should incentives be provided to encourage redevelopment? Commissioner Pierce gave an example of Villa Valhalla being over on number of dwelling units but having remaining Gross Residential Floor Area that they cannot use because of the non- conformity. Commissioner Kurz spoke to changing demographics and future property owners wanting dwelling units to be larger to accommodate families. Jim Lamont spoke to what he heard in the focus groups. He heard the buildings will tend to be rehabilitated verses complete redevelopment. At what point do we limit the number of dwelling units and eliminate the ability to live for a day, week, month, or permanently in the Village. Commissioner Pratt stated that he felt redevelopment incentives over the last ten years have been handled poorly. There are many projects which are too tall. Height is key in the Village. He suggested potentially relaxing the 60/40 roof height split. The limited availability of properties will cause values to increase to allow for redevelopment. 3/19/2013 Page 4 Michael Kurz suggested that the taller the building is permitted that there may be increased architectural detailing requirements. Commissioner Pierce spoke to his ideas on how buildings might redevelop. He spoke to the fact that each property has an individual and unique circumstances which might need to be addressed. Commissioner Cartin spoke to a need to control the hop scotching of development which has resulted in each subsequent project being larger than the previous. He used height as an example. Development seems to want an extra floor if the buildings adjacent are of a certain height. There was conversation by the Commissioners generally agreeing to allow existing development to maintain what they have if they are already in excess. Architectural Character: Tom Braun spoke to the comments heard from the focus groups. Commissioner Pierce spoke to the Pepi’s Sports wing which is new and in contrast with the hotel as being appropriate. He spoke to the spaces between buildings which are special not necessarily the architecture. Commissioner Kurz spoke to the great architecture of the Bell Tower Building and the Gasthof Gramshammer as being special, but there are other expressions of alpine architecture which may be appropriate. Commissioner Pratt departed at 2:48 pm. Jim Lamont spoke to have buildings which all looked like the Bell Tower Building would be too much. He agrees that some diversity is appropriate. Commissioner Kurz spoke to a blend of Austria Haus, Sonnenalp, Bell Tower Building, as being appropriate with regard to architecture. Commissioner Kurz stated that if a building were to be big in the Village the Ritz-Carlton is an example of how to do big and beautiful. He added that rooflines and materials would be a good place to begin in defining the character. Commissioner Pierce spoke to his interactions with retailers and their thoughts around the need for windows and doors. Commissioner Cartin spoke to his disbelieve that planters and some landscaping prevent patrons from entering restaurants and retail. Retail storefront: Jim Lamont spoke to the European direction of store fronts, which is larger panes of glass and reduced divisions (mullions). Commissioner Cartin spoke to the variety of the window types being appropriate but the need for retailers to display goods in an attractive manner is important as well. 3/19/2013 Page 5 Commissioner Pierce spoke to the use of glass types which significantly reduces reflectance to allow for pedestrians to see in. There needs to be detailing of handles, etc. Tom Braun stated that maybe a building needs to be reviewed in whole with regard to store fronts. Allowing for differing windows in various tenant spaces based upon the compilation of the whole. Commissioner Pierce spoke to the need to balance landscaping with retail store fronts. Jim Lamont spoke to a need to find 4 to 5 locations where specimen trees could be installed so as to get the canopy up above the retail storefront level. Commissioners Pierce and Kurz spoke to a need to look at Meadow Drive and to reevaluate the ability for buses to pass each other along the extent of the road. This causes an expanse of pavers that may not be desirable. Building height and sun/shade: Commissioner Pierce spoke to the need to provide height to accommodate floor plates of approximately 11 feet. Retail floor levels should be between 12 and 14 feet. Jim Lamont suggested using 3D modeling tools to examine the Village if height were to be increased. Commissioner Pierce inquired as to how the sun/shade analysis is used. If a project complies with height what comment is there regarding sun/shade? Are we going to tell someone no? 3. A request for review of a major amendment to Special Development District No. 16, Elk Meadows, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for changes to building sites, changes to architectural guidelines, increase in GRFA, and revisions to the on-site EHU requirement, located at 1624, 1626, 1628, 1630, and 1632 Buffehr Creek Road/ Elk Meadows Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130005) Applicant: Elk Meadows Development, LLC, represented by Sharon Cohn Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Tabled to March 25, 2012 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5-0-0 4. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit for a “public and private parks and active outdoor recreation areas, facilities and uses”, pursuant to Section 12-16-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of various improvements at Ford Park (Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater social courtyard, box office improvements, Betty Ford Way improvements, Betty Ford Alpine Garden expansion, new Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Alpine Education Center, nature trail, riparian restoration, playground restrooms) located at 530, 540, and 580 South Frontage Road East/ Unplatted, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130004) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Todd Oppenheimer Planner: Rachel Dimond ACTION: Table to April 8, 2013 MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5-0-0 5. Approval of April 9, 2012 minutes MOTION: Bird SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 3-0-2 (Rediker, Cartin abstained) 3/19/2013 Page 6 6. Information Update 7. Adjournment MOTION: Rediker SECOND: Bird VOTE: 5-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published March 8, 2013 in the Vail Daily. 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Council interviews for appointments to the Art in Public Places (AIPP); Building and Fire Codes Appeals Board (B&FCAB); Design Review Board (DRB); and Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). PRESENTER(S): Pam Brandmeyer ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Staff requests each applicant be interviewed at the work session and appoint 3 members to the AIPP; 1 member and 2 alternates to the B&FCAB; 2 members to the DRB; and 3 members to the PEC at the evening meeting. Staff has provided possible questions to ask applicants and an attendance record for current members for Council review and use. The terms for vacancies for AIPP, DRB, and PEC are for two years, April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2015. The term for the B&FCAB is for five years, April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: The Town recieved ten letters of interest for the open positions on AIPP, BF&FCAB, DRB and PEC as follows (incumbent members are asterisked): AIPP: Jennifer Mason * B&FCAB: Kathy Langenwalter*; Beth Levine; Mark Donaldson; Mark Hallenbeck DRB: Brian Gillette *;Tom Du Bois * PEC: Michael Kurz *; Luke Cartin *; Pamela Hopkins* STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Council interview each applicant at the work session and appoint three members to the AIPP; one member and two alternate members to BF&CAB; two members to DRB; and three members to the PEC at the evening meeting. ATTACHMENTS: AIPP, B&FCAB, DRB, PEC Letters of Interest 031913 AIPP Questions and Board Attendance Records B&FCAB Questions and Board Attendance DRB & PEC Questions and Board Attendance 3/19/2013 To: Town Council From: Pam Brandmeyer Date: March 19, 2013 Subject: Appointments to the Art in Public Places Board (AIPP); Building and Fire Codes Appeals board (B&FCAB); Design Review Board (DRB); and Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) I. ITEM/TOPIC: Appointments to the Art in Public Places Board (AIPP); Building and Fire Codes Appeals board (B&FCAB); Design Review Board (DRB); and Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) II. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: There are currently three vacancies on the AIPP; three vacancies (one regular member and two alternates) on the B&FCAB; two vacancies on the DRB; and three vacancies on the PEC. The Town received one (1) application for the AIPP vacancies; four (4) applications for the B&FCAB vacancies; two (2) for the DRB vacancies; and three (3) applications for the PEC vacancies. There is one incumbent member for the AIPP and the B&FCAB vacancies; two incumbent members for the DRB; and three incumbent members for the PEC (noted by the asterisks below). Staff requests Council interview each applicant at the work session and then appoint the applicants to fill the vacancies on the AIPP, which terms end March 31, 2015; B&FCAB, which term ends March 31, 2018; DRB, which terms end March 31, 2015; and PEC, which terms end March 31, 2015. The applicants are as follows: AIPP Jennifer Mason * B&FCAB Kathy Langenwalter* Beth Levine Mark Donaldson Mark Hallenbeck DRB Brian Gillette * Tom Du Bois * 3/19/2013 Town of Vail Page 2 PEC Michael Kurz * Luke Cartin * Pamela Hopkins* III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Council appoint the members to the AIPP, which terms end March 31, 2015; B&FCAB, which term ends March 31, 2018; DRB, which terms end March 31, 2015; and PEC, which terms end March 31, 2015. 3/19/2013 • 3/19/2013 Jennifer Mason 2602 Cortina Lane Vail, Colorado 81657 February 28, 2013 Mrs. Lorelei Donaldson My name is Jennifer Mason and I am a resident of the town of Vail. The purpose of writing this letter is to express my intention of continuing a board position on the Art and Public Places board for the town of Vail. The program has particularly caught my interest, because of all the good work and public service this board is providing to the town of Vail. I served on the board for the last 3 years and I would like to continue to serve the town of Vail. My experience on the board has made me appreciate and value public art in our community. I work at the Vail Valley Foundation in the Operations department I bring to the board expertise of how events flow in and out of the community. I value both the visiting guest and long time local I believe by having a strong AIPP in Vail it will set the standard for all mountain communities and make the an even better place to live and visit. Sincerely, Jennifer Mason 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 peei/iangenwaiter architects, !.I.c. david m. peel. aJa. kathy langenwalter 2588 arosa drive p.O. box 1202 vail, co 81658 970-476-4506 970-476-4572 fax February 26,2013 Vail Town Council Members Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Lorelei Donaldson Dear Council Members; I am currently a member of the Vail Building and Fire Codes Appeals Board and would like to continue serving on this board. As a practicing licensed architect for thirty plus years, I am familiar with building and fire codes, building materials, and methods of construction. My work includes selecting alternate materials and methods as well as resolving conflicts and solving problems. I have a good working relationship with the staff as well as the necessary experience and qualities to serve as an advisor to the Council on building related issues. Last year the Appeals Board reviewed and recommended the adoption of the 2012 International Building and Residential Codes which went into effect on January 1 of this year. The board is continuing to work on improved customer services within the building department. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, Kathy Langenwalter 3/19/2013 Tammy Nagel From: Lorelei Donaldson Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:20 AM To: Tammy Nagel Subject: Fwd: Board of Appeals Attachments: Resume-Beth Levine Architect, Inc.2012-10-29doc.pdf; ATIOOOO1.htm Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Beth Levine <beth@bethlevinearchitect.com> Date: February 14, 2013, 1:58:24 PM MST To: 'Martin Haeberle' <MHaeberle@vailgov.com>, Lorelei Donaldson <LDonaldson@vailgov.com> Subject: RE: Board of Appeals 2013-2-14 TOV-Board of Appeals Hello Loreliie, I just wanted to touch base with you regarding my application for the Town of Vail Board of Appeals. I am interested in serving on the board as I have been working in and submitting drawings to the Town of Vail for over 25 years. I served on the 2009 CODE committees and on the Sustainability Board. Please E-mail when you get a moment and confirm my application for this position. Thank you, Beth Beth Levine Architect, Inc. 1 3/19/2013 Beth leYine Architect, Inc Beth Levine Architect, Inc. P.O. Box 1825 Avon, CO 81620 Phone: 970-926-4993 Fax: 970-926-2993 beth@bethlevinearchitect.com Education: 1985 1982 Licenses: 1987 Work History: 1997 to Present 1987 to 1997 1986 to 1992 1986 to 1987 1985 to 1986 1983 to 1985 1981 to 1983 Publications: 2008 2002 1997 1997 1989 Masters ofArchitecture University ofColorado; Denver, Colorado Bachelor ofEnvironmental Design Minor in Mechanical Engineering University ofMinnesota; Minneapolis, Minnesota State ofColorado Architectural License Owner; Beth Levine Architect, Inc. Project Architect; Pierce, Segerberg, Architects Instructor; Colorado Mountain College Intern Architect; Robert L. Arnold, Architect Intern Architect; Intratect, Bill Pierce Architect Teaching Assistant; University ofColorado at Denver Mechanical Designer; Toltz, King, Duvall, & Anderson, Inc. Golden Eagle Restaurant; Vail Home Magazine, Spring Vail Valley Drive Residence; Mountain Horizons, Winter Golden Peak Penthouse sales record, published in the Vail Daily Newspaper Chicago Condominium published in the "Showcase ofInterior Design: Pacific Edition II" Vail Village Inn Residence; Cover of"Colorado Homes and Lifestyles" Volunteer Experience 2011 Town ofVail, Sustainability Committee 2009 Town ofVail, CODE Committee for the 2009 code change 3/19/2013 v 970/949-5200 90 BENCHMARK ROAD SUITE 207 PO BOX 5300 AVON, C081620 FAX 949-5205 Vacancy for Town of Vail Building & Fire Codes Appeals Board February 28,2013 ARC HIT E C T S To: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk Idonaldson@vailgov.org Town of Vail From: Mark Donaldson, Principal markd@vmda.com Victor Mark Donaldson Architects Re: Statement of Interest in serving as Building & Fire Codes Appeals Board In response to the advertised vacancy on this Board, please accept this letter of interest and consider my extensive Colorado experience as a licensed Architect including Land Planning and Interior Design and Architecture. I have been a full time resident of Eagle County, beginning in Vail in March of 1976 and have practiced continuously for nearly 37 years. As a Principal in VMDA, our firm has designed and executed Design and Construction Documents and provided Contract Administration Services for many Commercial, Residential Single and Multi Family and Institutional development Projects. My extensive background includes Mixed-Use, Specialty Uses, Land Planning, Refurbishment, Re-Purposing, Remodel and New Construction. On behalf of our extensive Private, Municipal, Corporate and HOA Client Groups, we have continuously sought and coordinated effectively proper and compliant applications of Code and Regulatory Requirements. We work professionally and effectively with Building, Fire, Planning, Public Works and Engineering Departments including the towns of Vail, Avon, Eagle, Keystone, Aspen and Steamboat Springs as well as Eagle, Pitkin, Routt Summit and Boulder Counties. You will find attached, my personal curriculum vitae for further information. Warm regards, Mark Donaldson 3/19/2013 v 970/949-5200 0090 WEST BENCHMARK ROADN SUITE 207 PO BOX 5300 AVON, CO 81620 FAX 949-5205 WWW.VMDA.COM VICTOR MARK DONALDSON, PRINCIPAL VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS Spring 2012 ARC HIT E C T S Mark has 36 years experience in Eagle County, CO with a wide range of professional experience on numerous site and building specific envelope solutions. These Projects include Institutional, Government, Special Districts, Commercial and Private Sector Client Groups. Project Experience: Village Hall/Beaver Creek Mall Renovation Vail Inter-Faith Chapel Renovation Planning for Avon Town Square Joint Venture Mountain Center Renovation Beaver Creek Ski School Renovation Beaver Creek Metro District Operations Facility Trudeau Residence Renovation/Expansion Beaver Creek Resort Executive Offices Glenwood Springs Ford Dealership Beaver Creek Reception Center Refurbishment Reilly Estate Vail Resorts Regional Distribution Center Village Hall Parking Structure Renovation Medical Clinic -New Castle. CO City Market -Eagle, CO Metcalf Commercial Park Vail Commons/City Market Village Quayle Residence City Market -Silverthorne Renovation A von Chamber of Commerce Offices Buffaloes -Vail Mountain Restaurant Miller Residence Avon Municipal Complex & Renovation Vail Daily Regional Headquarters Marriott Courtyard Hotel Lot C Planning Seasons at A von Refurbishment/Expansion Lot C -PUD Entitlements & Land Planning Clocktower Place Avon CrOSSing Condominium Confluence -PUD Entitlements & Land Planning Town of Avon Recreation Center Refurbishment Vail Timber Ridge Education: Bachelor of Architecture, Texas Tech University, 1973 Registration: Licensed Architect, State of Colorado, Registration #B-1348 NCARB Certificate #24140 Licensed Architect, State of Texas. Registration #22870 Community Associations & Public Service: Echo Ranch Children's Home (501.C.3), Founding Director (12 years) Avon Planning Commission (6 years) Regional Fire Authority (1 year) Eagle County Planning Commission [4 years} Eagle County United Way. Founding Director (2 years) Avon Metropolitan District Board. Director [1 year) Mount Holy Cross Lutheran Church Board (4 years) Avon Building Department Board of Appeals, Chairman (4 years) 3/19/2013 March 11, 2013 Vail Town Council Attn: Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk 75 South Frontage Rd Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Council Members, Please accept this letter as confirmation that I wish to submit my name as a candidate to fill a vacant position on the Town of Vail Building and Fire Code Appeals Board. I trust you will find my qualifications and experience are well suited for this position. My qualifications are as follows: • 10 years experience as a general contractor living in Vail • 28 years experience as a general contractor • College degree in electrical engineering Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to becoming a member and serving on this Appeals Board for the Town of Vail. Yours respectfully, Mark Hallenbeck President Rocky Mountain Construction Group 120 Willow Bridge Rd Suite 7 Vail, CO 81657 Office 970476-4458 Fax: 970476-4951 www.rockymountainconstructiongroup.com 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 GILLETTE u.c CONSTRUCTION March 11, 2013 Lorelei Donaldson Vail Town Clerk 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: DRB and PEC appointment term expirations Dear Lorelei Donaldson: I am writing to express my interest in retaining my seat on the Design Review Board. I have been a board member since May 2, 2007. Please find a brief description of my experience below: BRIAN GILLETIE graduated from the University of Colorado at Boulder with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration in 1994. Gillette started with George Shaeffer Construction Company in 1995 as a carpenter. Quickly advancing to the position of site superintendent, Brian constructed a number of homes throughout the valley. Many close relationships with subcontractors and vendors were developed over these years. Gillette was serving in the capacity of both site superintendent and project manager by 2003, responsible for the buyout, budget management, scheduling, and quality control of each project. Gillette was chosen to head Shaeffer's preconstruction service efforts in 2003. He was responsible for their marketing, initial client contact and contract negotiation. Gillette worked closely with the various architects on estimating, value engineering, and job cost accounting. Additionally, Brian supervised staffing, information technology, insurance procurement, and other duties relating to Shaeffer's operations. Gillette left George Shaeffer in November 2006 to start Gillette Construction and is currently engaged in the construction of single family residences within the Town of Vail. Brian lives with his family in Vail, Colorado. I appreciate the Council's consideration. Sincerely, GILLETTE LLC !t\LL~"\t. Brian Gillette Voice: (970)390·7981 brianJiliette@gillettellc.com cc: Warren Campbell POST O( HCI: Box 5821 970.390.7981 VAIL. COU)f{\Df) 81658 gilIettcllC.com 3/19/2013 Thomas R Du Bois March 11,2013 Town Council Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Town Council, I would like to be considered for re-appointment to another tem on the Design Review Board. Should the Council choose to do so, this would be my last eligible term. I have been a resident of Vail for nearly 13 years and am a licensed architect, owning and managing my own architectural firm since 2003. I have found my time on the Design Review Board to be very rewarding and feel my experience has been very beneficial to the Town in preserving, maintaining and enhancing the quality of the built environment in accordance with the Town of Vail's vision, ordinances and various Design Review Guidelines. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Thomas R. Du Bois POBox 4118 tel: 970-390-6451 Vail, CO 81658 trdubois@att.net 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 Tammy Nagel From: Lorelei Donaldson Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:19 AM To: Tammy Nagel Subject: Fwd:PEC Attachments: imageOOl.gif; image002.png Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Kurz <mkurz@kurzstrategic.com> Date: March 4, 2013, 7:07:32 AM MST To: <Idonaldson@vailgov.com> Subject: PEe Good Morning Lorelei 'Hope you are feeling better. 'Must have been a scary thing to go through. Please accept this email as an indication of my interest in serving another term with the PEe. For the past 6 years, I've done my best to serve the Town and I'm thinking I finally have the hang of it. Please advise when the hearing will be. Thanks. Have a great, safe day. G --.-..---.--...--- 1 3/19/2013 Luke Cartin 3008 South Frontage Rd W. Vail, Colorado 81657 March 11, 2013 To the Vail Town Council: I am expressing my interest in renewing my position on the Planning and Environmental Commission. I believe my input during my role as a PEC Commissioner has been beneficial for the town. I have been fair and transparent with my decisions, and I have recused myself on any potential conflicts of interest I have used both my professional and personal experiences to help guide with environmental decisions, as well as decisions that will help shape the town into the future. I have enjoyed serving my town, and hope to be reappointed. Please feel free to address any questions, comments or concerns to me via email (lcartin@yahoo.com) or call me on my cell phone (970-331-9804). I look forward to your questions during the upcoming work session. Thank you for your consideration, Luke Cartin 3/19/2013 SNOWDON AND HOPKINS ARCB I(lJ 001 Snowdon dnd Hopkins. Architects, R,'. Milreh 11. 2013 Lorelei DumJlusoll VaH Tawil Clerk 75 Suuth Fl'onl1lgc Ruud Vail, Culorauo S}(>57 RE: ." ':C I\pplicaLion fkur I.(lrdeL Plea'i~ ucc~pl this IcUe!" ;'-IS my <lpplicaLiulllo npply for n position on lh~ PEe l1nunl. I havc work~d a~ a Partnl!r wilh Snuwdon and Ilopkins Archil~cLs for the Inst Ihirty-l~)ur yc::ars. Our ulliec wnl' loc:ued in the ViJ141gC l()I' Lwenty-tjv~ YC•.lrS, Twus on the PI ~(~ ti'om 11)~5 to 19lN and the AI PP Roaru for eight YCl.Irs 1.!1lC.1i1lg. 2012 uml currently Oil the Colorado SLaLe Board of Licensure tell' .l\rchih::cL~. Pl'l)f~ssional I~ngineers ulld Professionnl f.:-Inti Surveyors. My resume is included with this leHer, I was involvt:u in LIH..~ V(lirS Ma.')L~r I'lanning nlld am il1tcl'e~ted in hecoming involved wilh IIcxl :5f:lgC." nrVi.liI's Rc-dcvdopmenl. I have lived iulOWll for the Ino::t 14 years, nllseu my IUlTlily and h'1<1 i.l s\lcccs~flli ilrchiLeclural practice. My hcmt is in Vl.lill.lnd Jknow that I could conlrihule to the future of Vail. 1 have cn,ioycod working on Ihe /\IPI' Hoard I(>r the last seven YCtU's tinct seeing the increase in thc IHII110cr lIf pr~jcct~ compleled uver lhc last live years. We IUlvl! "Iso seen growth in thc m1l111al budget and the numher of pult::nli..t1 projects 1'01' (he coming Il:w yenrs. I have enjoyed Icnrning ",or~ anuul mt .IfIU :-;culptul'e ,md the new artists flS we select them for new )lrojecl~ and !'iile:-;. Twould enjoy conlilluing lo wurk wilh the Town (If V.,il as " mcmbcl' ufthc PEe hon,'" and hope to sec even mOl'e success/hi TcnUVttLion of the town, Thank you for your considerulinn. Pamela W. I [ol}kin~. AlA. LEE!> Aft Snuw~km <Iud 1 h\pkins Al'c-hill,Tls, I'.C. 7 h . 1. 1. () I • rtI x: q 7 () , 'I 7 h . 7 t1 I) I 3/19/2013 SNOWDON AND HOPKINS ARCH ~002 Snowdon dnd Hopkins. Architects; :P;'. ~~~.:~.<".. '. 1';,.'.:""._' Pamela W. Hopkins. AfA. LEED AP RAgi~tAred Architect, State of Colorado (81165) LEED Accredited Prorcssional Education Bachelor of Architecture, University or Colorado Professional Exporience Partncr in clu.IF!Jtt, Sunwl"l(Jn ;'lnd Hopkins Architects. P.C. E;.tyltt COUrlty's Continuunl of Care Retirement Community 2.011 Artdition ~nd Interior Henovation of Town of Vail Public Librury, 2012 L!:!ED Certiricd Silvcr Residence, Cordillera Hanch, :lU 10 Game Creek Club irrte;,riur rellovation, Vail Village location. 2010 Exterior Renovation of Diamond Buildino. RivArwalk, ErlwardR. :lOn9 Addition to the GilJJin County Public Library. 2009 1,000 sq.fl. Addition to the Eagle Public Library. 2008 8.500 sQJt.: construction dk1 not proceAd FirstBank of Vail and Firsll3ank of Avon; 2007 and 2009 FxlHrior lind landscaping upgrades Inn at Bellller CrAAk redevelopment, 2006 50,000 sq.ft., construction did not proceed Ski Club Vail redevelopmonl. Vuil. CI)loruuu, 2000 35.000 sq.ft. Base ofVaj. Mountain, construction did not proceed Pinedale PubliC Library. Wyom9, 1998 (Consullant Archilecl) Consulted during design phase for Carney Architects E;~gle Public Library. Eagle. Coforado. 1997 15,000 sq.rt. New library Avon Public Library. Avon. Colorudo. 1995 15,000 sq.n. New library Vail Mountnin School library Addition, Vail. Colorado, 1995 3,000 SII,fI. RHn(Jv~li(Jn and addition VilI' POlice Department and Municipal Complex, Vail. Colorado. 1994 (Consultant to Hoth Sheppard Architects) Gilpin County Public Library. Colorado. 1995 5,000 Rq,rt. New library F.rnerald Acre!'l Office Complex, Avon, Colorado. 1995 45,000 sq.n. Eight building campus Garden of the Gods Hotel and Condominiurn. Vuil. Coloruuo 30,000 sq.ft Renovation and uddilion eugene Field Public library. DeJlv6r. C(Jlur;~dO. 1993 (Collsultant Architect} Consulted during deSign phase and interior layout for Roth Sheppard Architects jl () H I,J X 3] 4 () • V d I I, C(J lor il d () X 1 (i;,8 • I' h () " f': I) 'i 0 . t1 7 h· ',,!. ! () t • r (I ~ q 70 . .:1 7 h • 7 Ll () ., 3/19/2013 SNOWDON AND HOPKINS ARCH I4J 003 Snowdon and Hopkins. Architects,<'.' '. Inn i:l1 Beaver Crcok. Beaver Crl1t1k. Colorado 5:;.000 sq.rt. Hotel at buse of ski moun\<1in Fluy~tarf Public Library, J=lagstarr. Arizona. 1087 35.0()O sq.fl. Nt1w library Vail Public L.ibrary. Vail. Colorado, 1983 15.000 sq.ft. New library nfi+ Custom Residences Associations American Institute of Architccts MAmber, U.S. Grt.tftn Building Council F.ii91tit County Sust;)inabllity Advisury Board, 2011 Town ot Vail Sush.tinabllity Advisory Committee. 2011 Member. Town of Vail Waste Diversion & Recycling Advisory CornrfJiUt.tft, 2009 Member. Vail's Arts in Public PIDce$ Commission. 2004-2012 Member. Planning and I::nvironmcnlu/ Commission. Town of Vail, 1985-1989.2011-2015 l-3oard of Trustees. Vail Mounlain School. 1986-2000 Member. Design Committec. Performance and Conference Center. V.iil, CO Jury and Awards 1987 Jury. Biennial AINALA National Dt.tsign Competition 1985 AtA/ALA AwcmJ of Excellence -Vail Library 1984 AlA Western Mountain Rf:tgion Award of Merit Vail Library Publications The Vail Library, Solar Age, Sljplember 1985 The Vail Library. rrocess: Architecture (9U), Passive c.Uld Low Energy Architecture, September 1991 City of Flagstaff/Coconino County Public Librury, Arizona libraries. September 1987 City of Flagstaff/Coconino County Public Library, Architecture. O(.;lulJar 1988 Public Libraries, Travel Treasures at the West. Mc.vlin 13. Rabkin, North American Press. Nt)vHmber 1993 Professional Oevoloprnent H;)rvard University Ext.tI~lJtive Program Public Libraries -1995 Hurvard University Executive Program -Pulllit: Libraries -200G Papers puthored. Sustai nable Architt1ctlJre and Green De~ign P () 11 n)( ~ ~ ,1 () • V.I i I. ((J lor d d 0 SIb 5 S • P II 1.1 n ": C) 70·4,' 6· ? .? 01 • I cI x: 970· tI 71"; . 7111) I 3/19/2013 Questions for Prospective AIPP Board Members 1. The arts can be a strong economic driver. Art in Public Places aims to stimulate cultural tourism, contribute to economic vitality and elevate the role ofthe visual arts in Vail. Do you support and can you help to further this vision? 2. Fundraising is becoming increasingly important to AIPP. How can you help? 3. The board meets on the first Monday ofeach month. Board members are expected to miss no more than 2 meetings per year. Board members also attend other meetings and serve on committees. Can you make the time commitment? 4. AIPP Guidelines state that a specific objective ofthe program is to develop a diverse, high quality public art collection. The overall program shall strive for diversity in style, scale, media and artists. Exploratory types ofwork as well as established art forms shall be encouraged. Is diversity an objective you can support? 3/19/2013 Art in Public Places Board Attendance 4/2012-3/2013 A B C D 1 Date !Doe Bro\<\fning . Kaili Chipman i Cookie Flaum 2 4/2/2012 3 5/7/2012 Absent-..---~~---- f-------.. 4 6/4/2012 -t Absent ..~... 5 7/2/2012' Absent 6 8/6/2012 7 9/10/2012 Absent 8 10/1/2012! 9 11/12/2012 Absent Absent . _. ~ 12/3/2012 Absent Absent1-.....__.. 11 1/7/2013 Absent 12 2/4/20131 !Absent 13 3/4{20131 .. IAbsent ._- E F G Susan :-.~ .,. ...~ ~!~y~",.~...~iJel'!.nifer Mas~n Absent Absent Absent ._---------- . _. t--. !Absent ---._-r·· Absent ~..--. .__.. Absent . .. H I 1 Monica 1\JI.......t:;., Bill Pierce Dan Telleen r --- Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent ---- . Absent ---_. ---._- IAbsent ._- Absent ---- Absent -~:::~i.-.. ._. IAbsent .----.. -... IAbsel IAbsent !Absent Absent 3/19/2013 Building and Fire Appeals Board Interview Questions 1. The main responsibility of a board member is to hear appeals of the building official and fire marshal as to interpretation of the building and fire codes. Example: The building official has determined that a specific foam product may not be used in a building. The product manufacturer is appealing that decision to the board. How will your previous experience be used to make a decision on a building or fire code requirement? 2. One of the responsibilities of a board member is to review new editions of the building codes for possible adoption by the town. Do you have any experience in a code development process? If so, please give us an example. If not, please explain how your previous experience and education will help you participate in the code review process. 3. A mountain community such as ours requires the use of some unique construction practices. Please give us an example of a construction practice that you have used to adapt to a condition that is unique to our local environment? 3/19/2013 Building and Fire Appeals Board Attendance. 2012 M'-':~:, .••. 'i\i!;c~z;":~:':cl;;:,!,i0'.' ,.,{. Mark Mueller January 12,2012 x February 7,2012 x March 8, 2012 X April 12, 2012 x May 10,2012 x June 14,2012 absent July 12, 2012 x August 9, 2012 absent September 13, 2012 x September 24, 2012 x October 11,2012 x November 8, 2012 x Decmeber Meeting Canceled Total Attended 10 Total Absent 2 Total EarIY[)~j)arture 0 .' t:citt~¥'i~" 'i'3,e.~ 14."" i*';'\~"";~'P.t;:::;·':ik.· '. ,e::': :ti,·'~~~~1;.~·';"',l" ";;,,.•: Kyle Webb Kathy Langenwalter Greg Conway x x x x absent x absent X X x absent x absent x x absent x Resigned absent x absent x x x x x x absent absent x 6 9 5 6 3 0 0 0 0 i"l,;' ,i1&",l,l , :··:~C~. ~••.Igl"~dc..;. .~"J;:~'.• :.'}'i'f!~.:.: ..•..••• ii" .,' In','; ;.;. H: ...• ;'~ Steve Loftus Rollie Kjesbo (alter) x x .' x absent X X x x x x absent x x absent x x x absent x x x Appt. member x x 11 8 1 3 0 0 C:\Users\magel\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\92XMHRPv\BOA Attendance 2012 3/19/2013 Potential Questions for ORB and PEC candidates 1) Do you understand the role and time commitment to be on the PEC/DRB? 2) What skills do you possess that you think would be a benefit to your role if appointed? 3) What do you think the role of a PEC/DRB member is or should be? 4) Why have you submitted an application to be appointed/reappointed to the PEC/DRB? 5) What impact do you believe you could have on the PEC/DRB if appointed? 6) What do you think the PEC/DRB is doing correctly? 7) What do you believe the PEC/DRB could improve upon? 8) What has been your most rewarding aspect of having served on the PEC/DRB? 9) What do you see as the future of the Town of Vail? 1 O)What impact are you hoping to have on the future of the Town of Vail? 3/19/2013 Design Review Board Attendance, 2011 • '~5 ~,,{ 1M ....,.. :~~'}~ ~;~~;~ April 4, 2012 April 18,2012 May 2,2012 May 16, 2012 June 6,2012 June 20, 2012 July 4, 2012 July 18, 2012 August 1, 2012 August 15, 2012 September 5, 2012 September 19, 2012 October 3, 2012 October 17, 2012 November 7,2012 November 21, 2012 December 5, 2012 December 19,2012 January 2, 2013 January 16, 2013 February 6, 2013 February 20, 2013 March 6, 2013 March 20, 2013 Total Attended Total Absent Total E;arly Departure R~~~f, .\~<i1;t::z:,¢ Andy Forstl X X X X ABSENT X Cancelled X X X X X X X X X X X ABSENT X x ABSENT x 19 3 . 0 ~,if,:l1~,~1{ L\'o;;/ >":f~" 'v:~;,:(,.;, . .....\,' ," . ..,~ ;1'111l>''''iiYil.·'; ,:; Rollie Kjesbo Tom DuBois Brian Gillette X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X ABSENT X X X X X ABSENT X X X X X X X X ABSENT X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 22 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 I:'·, , ..,t~.;,~",,:>Iq;,:/..·,,}< "I;; ....,.. .' UbbyMaio X X X ABSENT X X Cancelled X X X ABSENT X X X X X X X X X x X X . i 20 2 C:\Users\tnagel\AppOata\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\92XMHRPV\ORB Attendance Table 2012-2013 3/19/2013 PEC 2011 Attendance Table ."t'i:,/,{;;······iMeetiijo.[)I"·....'''4"''',~'.< . < "'"''''':':';':''' 'C':'" '.:·:/:f;j,f'-1~2 .. ':':t!{;:~.: ..••, ' : ..; :~", "". '.,', ";' " .. ' . .c:.: ,:: '.' :'. .:i.",·,:..,.,.:....., i e • ' • lt~l.l:~~lpeQ'Atte· d .. ·:c. .~, ". ;. n ance:tffl'i&L'Ff: Bill Pierce Henry Pratt Michael Kurz luke Cartin Susan Bird John Rediker Pam Hopkins April 9, 2012 X X X ABSENT X X X April 23, 2012 X X X X X X X May 14, 2012 X X X X X X X May 21,2012 X X X X X X ABSENT May 28,2012 Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled June 11,2012 Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled June 25, 2012 X X X X X X X July 9,2012 X X X X X X ABSENT July 23,2012 X X X X X X X August 13,2012 X X X X X ABSENT ABSENT August 27,2012 X X ABSENT ABSENT X X X September 10, 2012 X X X X X X X September 24,2012 X X X ABSENT X X X October 8,2012 ABSENT X X X ABSENT ABSENT X October 22,2012 X X X X X X X November 12, 2012 X X X X X X X November 26,2012 X X X X X X X December 10, 2012 X X X X X X ABSENT December 24, 2012 Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled January 14, 2013 X X X X X X X January 28, 2013 X X X X X X X February 11, 2013 X X X X X X X February 25, 2013 X X X ABSENT X ABSENT ABSENT March 11, 2013 X X X X X X ABSENT March 25, 2013 TOTAL ATTENDED 20 21 20 17 20 18 15 TOTAL ABSENT 1 0 1 4 1 3 6 C:\Users\tnagel\AppData\local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\92XMHRPv\PEC Attendance Table 2012-2013 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b) - to receive legal advice on specific legal questions, Regarding: Council process; 2) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Regarding: Pending litigation; 3) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(f) - to discuss personnel matters, Regarding: Council direct reports. PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Evolving Vail: Jeff Winston, of MIG Winston, will give a presentation on how Vail has changed, yet largely stayed the same, over the past 30 years through the application of the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines. PRESENTER(S): Jeff Winston ATTACHMENTS: Design Guidelines Overtime PowerPoint 3/19/2013 - 3/19/2013 Worl< in Vail. .. • W Urban Design Guide Plan • W Architectural Guidelines • W Master Plan • W Streetscape Master Plan • LH Master Plan • Library Plaza • Arosa Garmisch Park • Mayor's Park • Gore Creek Promenade • EastVail Roundabout • WestVail Roundabout • Covered Bridge Renovation • LH West Entry* • WestVail Master Plan • Design reviews (30+) 3/19/2013 Great appreciation for ... • how places really evolve • how form can be influenced • the power of a good idea, and committed people • the whole is truly greater than the sum of its parts 3/19/2013 » c- o c: r-t W o '< CD .,~ (I) ~ OQ o ••• 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 Key early decisions ... • Curve in Bridge Street • Gore Creek Drive views • Covered Bridge • Parking structures • Stucco • Ornamental woodwork 3/19/2013 • • • OJ '< '-'> (X) o 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 3/19/2013 Great appreciation for ... • how places really evolve • how form can be influenced • the power of a good idea, and committed people • the whole is truly greater than the sum of its parts 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: The purpose of this work session is to update the Vail Town Council on the progress of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project. The Vail Village Character Area Preservation project is reviewing the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan to address the following problem statement: As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur to the physical features of Vail Village, are the town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell Tom Braun, Braun Associates ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council is asked to listen to the presentation, ask questions, and provide feedback regarding the comments heard from the public and the Planning and Environmental Commission. BACKGROUND: On November 20, 2012, the Vail Town Council directed staff and Tom Braun, Braun Associates, to proceed forward with the Vail Village Character Area Preservation project. On February 7, 2013, several focus group meetings were held with various stakeholders in the Vail Village. Comments from those focus groups can be found in the attached Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum dated March 11, 2013. On February 11 and March 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission were introduced to the project and began discussing elements of the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Design Guide Plan that may need to be addressed in order to ensure redevelopment is achieving the desired results. ATTACHMENTS: PEC Memorandum 031113 Town Council Power Point Presentation 3/19/2013 TO: Planning and Environmental Commission and Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 11, 2013 SUBJECT: A request for a work session to discuss the Vail Village Character Study, an initiative to examine the Town’s current regulations, design standards and guidelines applicable to Vail Village to determine whether they are sufficient to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell I. SUMMARY The purpose of this work session is to allow the applicant, Town of Vail, to begin discussion on elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations which may need to be reexamined to address the project’s problem statement. The following problem statement was developed in conjunction with the Vail Town Council and is intended to guide the process, discussion and outcomes. As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur to the physical features of Vail Village, are the Town’s current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. Specifically staff will begin to discuss five topical areas of the Vail Village Master Plan and Vail Village Urban Design Guide. The five topical areas were developed through the focus group participation, staff’s, and consultant’s experience and observations. The five topics area as follows: • Architectural Character – Vail Village was “originally conceived as a mountain resort in the pattern of a quaint European alpine Village. Do the Town’s guidelines further this goal, what types of architectural expression, use of materials, etc. may be appropriate while still holding true to this vision? 3/19/2013 Town of Vail Page 2 • The Urban Design Guide Plan and Design and Design Considerations – Where do these guidelines currently apply, where should they apply? • Future re-development potential of properties that currently exceed allowable height, GRFA, etc. – A number of properties in VV that currently exceed zoning standards are considered potential candidates for redevelopment. Historically, properties in Vail have increased in size when re-developed. How can Town encourage re-development while at same time maintain the scale of buildings in the Village? • Landmark Designation – Are there improvements in the Village that warrant designation of “landmark” status? • Specific Elements of Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations – Eleven specific elements of the UDGP have been identified that may warrant refinement/clarification. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss each topic and determine which, if any, warrant further study and potentially amendments in order to improve the existing development review process and further the overall design goals for the Village. Based on feedback from the Planning and Environmental Commission, decisions will be made on which topics warrant further discussion. Staff and consultant will present amendment alternatives for such topics at a future meeting. Staff has provided links to the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan. II. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2009, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolution No. 23, Series of 2008, a resolution that provided for certain updates to the Vail Village Master Plan. One of the more significant updates to the plan was the addition of an objective recognizing the “historic” importance of architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features with the goal of preserving the existing character of Vail Village. In addition, one new policy statement was added to the plan to further the newly stated objective. The policy statement was developed to guide the Town's decision-making in achieving each of the stated objectives, whether it be through the review of private sector development proposals or in implementing capital improvement projects. Finally, action steps were suggested as immediate follow-up actions necessary to implement the goals of this Plan. To that end, the Vail Village Master Plan was updated to include the following language: GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY. 3/19/2013 Town of Vail Page 3 1.4 Objective: (in part) Recognize the “historic” importance of the architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features in preserving the character of Vail Village. 1.4.1 Policy: The historical importance of structures, landmarks, plazas and other similar features shall be taken into consideration in the development review process. 1.4.2 Policy: The town should grant flexibility in the interpretation and implementation of its regulations and design guidelines to help protect and maintain the existing character of Vail Village. 1.4.3 Policy: Identification of “historic” importance shall not be used as the sole means of preventing or prohibiting development in Vail Village. GOAL #1 Action Steps: (in part) 6. Compile a list and develop a map identifying the location of potential structures, landmarks, plazas and other similar features that may be of historical importance. On October 18, 2011 the Vail Town Council discussed Vail Village Historic Preservation and Landmark Designation. As a part of the discussion information was provided on historic preservation, preservation programs, creation of historic districts, common property owner concerns regarding historic designation, possible benefits of a historic district, etc. At the public hearing the Vail town Council was asked to respond to the following question: Should Town staff pursue a public process with the community to discuss preserving and protecting historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village and implementing any regulatory tools that may be necessary to carry out the Town’s development objectives? The Vail Town Council directed staff to pursue an initiative to preserve and protect historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village. On November 20, 2012 the Vail Town Council was introduced to the Vail Village Character Study that staff and Tom Braun of Braun and Associates was beginning. At the hearing The Vail Town Council was asked to affirm “The Question at Hand” (question provide under summary section of this memorandum). The Vail Town Council affirmed the direction that the project would take and the question it would seek to answer. 3/19/2013 Town of Vail Page 4 On February 7, 2013 several focus group sessions were conducted to obtain input and feedback on the initiative. Staff and the consultant have placed the comments heard from the focus groups into the following categories: Near Unanimous Consensus The character of the Village is important to Vail’s identity, it sets Vail apart, makes Vail unique. It is important to maintain this, to hold onto, reinforce the original vision for the Village. The Village is great, by and large the regulations/guidelines we have in place are working, with only a very few exceptions the new buildings have added/strengthened/reinforced the Village’s character The Village core is distinct from the rest of the Village, “character” is strongest in this area. Some variation to the literal interpretation of the “Swiss Alpine village” is OK, not all buildings will be perfect and not all buildings need to be, an anomaly here and there is OK. With regard to buildings, maintaining existing scale of the Village core is critically. There is no one single building in the Village that would rise to “landmark status”, rather it is the scale of buildings, the views, the plazas and public spaces, the pedestrian flow, dining decks are what set the Village apart. Iconic improvements – Covered Bridge. The Clock Tower (albeit no clear consensus as to whether the existing clock tower is worthy of preservation or whether having a clock tower in this location is important) Guidelines may need a refinement here or there, but no major overhaul of system is needed. General sense of what is most important – 1. Building scale 2. Public spaces/pedestrian flow/vitality and street life 3. Quality of design/construction/materials 4. Architecture Widely Held Consensus Some modest degree of additional height in Core might be acceptable (to address floor to ceiling “expectations” of guests) Greater building scale is acceptable outside of the Core (within reason) Design controls (UDGP) to further reinforce the Village’s establish character should be expanded to area outside of the Core (East Village, Meadow Drive) 3/19/2013 Town of Vail Page 5 Street life, vitality, activity . . . specifically outdoor dining decks are critical to the character of the Village. Some Degree of Consensus The most important change needed to design guidelines for the Village is to allow for/encourage the use of high quality materials (code talk for materials other than stucco). Guidelines need to encourage creativity/broader expression (while still respecting “alpine” character) More flexibility is needed with regard to window treatments (don’t mandate divided panes, allow for larger glass). Need to resolve conflict in Guidelines that require landscaping that blocks visibility of store fronts. Other Pertinent Comments When do you stop using increased levels of development as an incentive for redevelopment? The physical area of “the Village” is considered to extend from Vail Road to Vail Valley Drive, maybe to Manor Vail. Water is very important – both Gore Creek and the water features in the Village. Every site/building is unique, has its own characteristics/considerations that will influence review process. Mechanical – needs to be requirement to screen. What to do with non-conforming buildings – how will they ever have motivation to re-develop? Lodge at Vail, Sitzmark, etc. On February 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission was introduced to the project and the desired outcomes upon completion. III. RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission listens to the applicant’s presentation, asks questions, and provides feedback. IV. ATTACHMENTS 3/19/2013 Town of Vail Page 6 A. Vail Village Master Plan B. Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 VV Character Study Update Project Background/Context Community Input Sessions Identified Topics for Discussion/Potential Issues PEC Input Next Steps 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Community Input 3 small group interviews 1.5-2.0 hours each 21 participants Mixture of “old guard/new guard”, land owners, developers, architects, interested individuals Variety of comments – general and specific Fair amount of concensus 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Character of the Village is critical to Vail’s identity, it sets Vail apart Existing review process works well, nearly all new buildings have strengthened/reinforced original vision for Village. The Village core is distinct from the rest of the Village, “character” is strongest in this area. Maintaining existing scale of the Village core is critical, single most important consideration Greater building scale could be acceptable outside of the Core Some modest degree of additional height in Core might be acceptable (to address floor to ceiling “expectations” of guests) Summary of Input 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 No single building in Village has “landmark status”, rather it is the scale of buildings, views, the plazas, pedestrian flow that matter Dilemma – how to provide incentives for redevelopment of buildings that already exceed allowable development (height, SF) Some variation to the literal interpretation of the “Swiss Alpine village” is OK, not all buildings need to be “perfect” Design controls (UDGP) to further reinforce the Village’s establish character should be expanded to broader area Guidelines need refinement/clarification, but a major overhaul of system is not needed Summary of Input 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 PEC Topics for Discussion Landmarks Where UDGP Applies Non-conforming Properties/Redevelopment Potential Architectural Character Specific Elements of UDGP •Retail expansions •Storefronts/Windows •Storefronts/Landscaping •33’/43’ Building Height Limitation •Sun/Shade •Patios/Dining Decks •“Housekeeping” items 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Urban Design Guide Plan The Guide Plan The Design Considerations •Urban Design Considerations •Architectural and Landscape Considerations 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 The Guide Plan Sub-Area Concepts: 25. Commercial Expansion. 1 story to provide active façade to pedestrian street, help reinforce connection of Gore Creek Drive to Willow Bridge. 31. Future Bridge Improvement. Second major ped. entry to Village warrants increased imageability. . . . 15. Mid Block Connection. 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 The Guide Plan 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Urban Design Considerations - PEC Pedestrianization Vehicle Penetration Streetscape Framework Street Enclosure Street Edge Building Height Views 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Architectural/Landscape Considerations-DRB Roofs form/pitch/overhangs/compostion/stepped/materials Facades materials/color/transparency/windows/doors/trim Balconies color/size/mass/materials Decks and Patios Accent Elements Landscape Elements materials/paving/retaining walls/lighting/signage Services 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Topics for Discussion 1.Landmarks 2.Where UDGP Applies 3.Non-conforming Properties/Redevelopment Potential 4.Architectural Character 5.Specific Elements of UDGP •Retail expansions •Storefronts/Windows •Storefronts/Landscaping •33’/43’ Building Height Limitation •Sun/Shade •Patios/Dining Decks •“Housekeeping” items 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Landmarks 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Landmarks 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Landmarks 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Landmarks 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Landmarks PEC Direction Plazas/Ped Corridors/Public Spaces •Research status of non-TOV owned spaces •Strengthen public spaces via UDGP •Use UDGP to identify opportunities for new or improved public features Clock Tower •Presence of a landmark/tower in this location is critical •If replaced, design of new tower will be important, must be strong statement of Village Character •Utilize UDGP to re-inforce 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Where UDGP Applies 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Where UDGP Applies Questions for PEC: Should the principles of the UDGP apply to “outlying” areas of the Village? 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Where UDGP Applies PEC Direction •UDGP needs to be expanded to outlying Village area •“Blanket” application of UDGP may not be appropriate, need to evaluate specific elements of UDGP 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Non-Conforming Properties/Redevelopment 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Non-Conforming Properties/Redevelopment 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Non-Conforming Properties/Redevelopment Questions to PEC What incentive is the for non-conforming buildings to re- develop? How do you balance preserving scale of Village while also allowing for or encouraging re-development? Should the Town be encouraging re-development? Potentially conflicting goals: •Scale of buildings in core of Village is “right” •Scale is key defining feature of Village •Redevelopments have been positive •More buildings are in need of up-grade 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Non-Conforming Properties/Redevelopment PEC Direction •Study how non-conforming buildings could be allowed to build back to what they have (subject to site specific review) •Potentially address specific sites via UDGP •No real support for prohibition of SDD’s/height variances 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Architectural Character 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Architectural Character 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Architectural Character 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Architectural Character 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Architectural Character PEC Direction •General agreement that some variety is acceptable, this can be positive •Challenge lies in defining how much/what type/where variety may be appropriate •Ultimately, solution may be to rely on process and review boards •Return to PEC with more detailed evaluation of Guidelines, provide some definition of “variety”, ID areas that need clarification 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts/Retail Expansions 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts/Retail Expansion PEC Direction •Agreement on importance of retail and past success of UDGP in encouraging expansions •There is a need to evaluate Village for potential expansions or improvements of retail •Utilize UDGP as means to address potential areas 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts/Windows 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts/Windows PEC Direction •General consensus that the “process” has allowed for a variety of window treatments •Results have mostly been positive •Lack of clarity in UDGP, need to “clean up” and clarify Guidelines 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts/Landscaping 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts/Landscaping PEC Direction •Guidelines are lacking, do not provide clear direction •UDGP refinements need to find balance between goals of retail storefronts and use of plantings to soft streetscape, provide shade, provide color/interest, need to consider 4-season aspects, etc. 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP 33’/43’ building height allowance Current Guidelines Up to 60% of building may be built to a height of 33’ or less No more than 40% of the building may be higher than 33’, but not higher than 43’ PEC Direction •Height allowances are not in keeping with today’s standards •Modest increases to 33’/43’ may be warranted 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Outdoor Spaces/Sun/shade 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Outdoor Spaces/Sun Shade PEC Direction •Sun/Shade is critical, but is a difficult goal to achieve •Guidelines could benefit from more clarity, a more clear statement of expectations 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Specific Elements of UDGP Outdoor Spaces/Dining decks/patios PEC Direction •Consensus on importance of dining decks •Agreement that UDGP could address them more directly •Uncertainty as to how zoning could regulate 3/19/2013 Vail Village Character Study PEC Work Session #2 Next Steps •Evaluate approaches of other communities •Assess topics PEC wants to discuss further, define alternative responses, etc. •“Housekeeping” items •Follow-up work session with PEC 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Ford Park Master Plan and Management Plan Public Discussion. Public input will be heard in the evening (Item #4). PRESENTER(S): George Ruther ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Does the Vail Town Council have concerns with the direction recommended for Ford Park based upon the existing planning documents (1985 Master Plan, 1997 Management Plan, 2012 Management Plan Amendment)? If so, what are the concerns of the Town Council and why are they of concern? Based upon the Town Council’s responses to the first two questions, which of the three options should be pursued in moving forward? BACKGROUND: On March 5, 2013, the Vail Town Council moved to temporarily withdraw its consent, as the owner of the Ford Park property, to allow the proposed Phase II improvements to proceed through the development review process. In doing so, the Town Council requested an opportunity to visit Ford Park on March 19th to more fully understand any impacts that the Phase I improvements, which are currently under construction, may have on the proposed Phase II improvements. The Town Council also asked town staff to request that the applicants (BFAG, VVF, VRD, ToV) request a tabling of the development application to the April 8th public hearing of the PEC. On March 11th, the PEC tabled final action on the development application to the April 8, 2013 public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The town staff recommends the Vail Town Council first provides answers to the questions posed in the staff memorandum, dated March 19, 2013. The answers to these questions will aid in determining whether the development applications should proceed forward as currently proposed or whether further amendments to the Master Plan and Management Plan are required. ATTACHMENTS: Ford Park Management Plan memorandum Town Council Minutes 1973 Ordinance 6 1996 Vail Town Council Minutes Oct - Dec 1996-10-15 Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session 2013-0115 Town Council Minutes 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development MEMORANDUM To: Vail Town Council From: George Ruther, Community Development Director Date: March 19, 2013 Subject: Ford Park Management Plan and Phase II Improvements – Process Options Purpose There have been a number of questions circulating regarding the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment and the proposed Ford Park Phase II Improvements. The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to those questions in writing in hopes of clarifying the issues. To help clarify the issues, this memorandum provides information on the master plan history of Vail, a chronology of events and actions leading up to the submittal of a development application for Phase I and Phase II improvements in Ford Park, an overview of the process to amend a master plan and the review of a development application, a series of conclusions reached by staff, and options for the Vail Town Council to consider moving forward. Master Plan History 1973 Vail Plan The Vail Plan is Vail’s first master planning document. The master plan document was adopted by the Vail Town Council in August of 1973. According to the Plan, Antholz Park, later renamed Gerald R. Ford Park (1977), was identified as one means of addressing the Town’s growing need for recreational facilities. The Plan states, “As the Town has grown, the year-round resident population has increased and the need for recreation facilities, not only for visiting tourists, but for resident townspeople, has become apparent.” The Plan goes on to further state, “All properties of significant size within the Town limits were researched and the recommendation made that the Antholz property, adjacent to development at the east end of the Village, was the only site satisfying the recreation uses anticipated.” And, “The intended use program is a comprehensive one and eventually the park will include an impressive number of facilities in addition to extensive open turf space 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development and the delight of the natural earth forms and mature tree growth adjacent to Gore Creek. The uses include: Parking for 200 cars, ice rink, multi-use complex, grammar school, outdoor theater, picnic area, open space, play area, and tennis & handball courts.” 1985 Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan Park Master Plan On August 6, 1985, the Vail Town Council adopted the Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan Park Master Plan. Following a series of town meetings, meetings with special interest groups, the school district, youth services, and the completion of adult and school children surveys, three schematic designs were developed and presented. Ultimately Scheme A was selected. Scheme A included softball fields, parking, a swimming pool complex, pedestrian paths, a nature trail, open turf play/picnic areas, a nature center, an amphitheater, alpine garden area, historic buildings and structures, skating pond, and a snow dump. According to the Plan, “The master plan for Ford Park, along with this document, becomes the guidelines upon which development will be based. In addition, the design guidelines and maintenance recommendations presented in this report are the beginning of those to be developed by the Town of Vail for use in planning, design and management of future parks, open spaces and pedestrian/bikeway systems.” With regard to the park development and landscape character, the Plan indicates the following, “During the implementation of the amphitheater and alpine garden elements, a monitoring procedure should be developed by the Town which will provide for some measure of control over the private groups responsible for the construction of these facilities. These programs are needed to ensure that all development within the park is in accordance with the Master Plan and related guidelines.” And, “Structures, shelters or other site buildings are designed in a low “profile” or are set into slope areas to reduce their vertical dominance upon the site.” In summary, the Plan states, “Gerald R. Ford Park represents recreational master planning values which respect the natural environment of the site. Proper development and management provides in perpetuity for the recreational needs and enjoyment of citizens and visitors for generations to come.” 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development The Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan Park Master Plan remains in effect today. The Plan has since been amended to include the Ford Park Management Plan, as amended in 2012. 1997 Ford Park Management Plan On April 14, 1997, the Vail Town Council adopted the Ford Park Management Plan – an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan. Like all master planning documents, the Ford Park Management Plan is an element of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. As such, it is a planning document to be used to articulate the Town’s expectations for development and to guide future decision making. The Plan can be a regulatory when it is cited by reference in the Town’s zoning regulations. When considering an application for development in Ford Park, the final decision-makers (Town Council, PEC, DRB) shall make a finding that the proposal is in compliance with the recommendations of the Management Plan prior to granting an approval. If such a finding can not be made, the application shall be modified to ensure compliance, or denied. The following section of this memorandum highlights applicable text and diagrams from the Management Plan. These highlights are provided for informational purposes. “The Ford Park Management Plan process was initiated in June of 1995 in response to several development proposals which had been formally and informally discussed and as a means to solve existing park management issues. The development proposals included an Educational Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden, cultural/performing arts center, expansion of the tennis facility, athletic field fencing, and a community parking structure. Park management issues included parking shortage, frontage road access, pedestrian access and circulation, access for the elderly and disabled, utilization of the lower bench, conflicts between uses within the park, conflicts with adjacent property owners, and delineation of financial responsibilities. At the time the project was authorized Council expressed concern that a new master plan for Ford Park would result in an excessive amount of new development. In response, staff noted the intention of the project was to create a management plan as a means to adequately and consistently evaluate development proposals, thus limiting development and protecting the character of the park.” “The intention of the combined documents is to guide the outcome of future development proposals within Ford Park by modifying the permitted uses (1973 acquisition legislation), recommending development guidelines, limiting the number of leaseholders within Ford Park, and designating buffer/protection zones within and adjacent to the park.” “A proposal by the Alpine Garden Foundation to construct an educational center within the final phase of the garden area was controversial. Opposition to the expanded use of the garden and the interior of the park was a significant impetus to the creation of the 1997 Management Plan. In response to that opposition, the Vail Alpine Garden Foundation modified the proposal to locate the education 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development center near the athletic field parking lot on Vail Valley Drive. This location received conceptual approval by the Council on October 15, 1996, however the project was not implemented.” “To that end, this Plan, serving as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan, was intended to guide the outcome of future development and improvement proposals through the implementation of six major goals: 1. Preservation and protection 2. Reduction of vehicular intrusions 3. Reduction of conflicts between venues 4. Resolution of parking and Frontage Road access problems 5. Improvement of pedestrian circulation 6. Delineation of financial responsibilities” “The Ford Park Management Plan will take precedence over the 1985 Master Plan where conflicts or discrepancies occur. 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment The Ford Park Management Plan was adopted by the Vail Town Council in 1997. More recently, however, the Management Plan was amended by the Town Council in April of 2012. The expressed purpose of the amendment was “to reflect new ideas for improvements planned for the Park. Plans to make improvements to the Park were initiated when Vail voters approved funding by re-allocating a portion of Convention Center Funds to Ford Park.” Similar to other master plans adopted by the Town, the Management Plan establishes the overall policy objective for the use of Ford Park and provides recommended strategies for implementation to ensure that the policy objective is achieved. According to the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan, “The most recent motivation for initiating improvements to Ford Park evolved from discussions of how to utilize the Town’s Conference Center funding. In the Fall of 2011 Vail voters approved the re-allocation of the $9-plus million Conference Center Funds by an 87 percent margin. As endorsed by the voters, a portion of these funds was to provide funding for improvements to Ford Park, specifically improvements to the Ford Amphitheater, the Alpine Gardens, park- wide pedestrian flow, as well as expansion of the athletic fields and restroom improvements at the Ford Park athletic complex.” Additionally, Section 6: Illustrative Plan Components was amended to more specifically reflect the intended improvements. According to Section 6, in part, “The Ford Park Illustrative Plan provided herein replaces the site plans from the 1997 Ford Park Management plan. This new plan reflects many of the same 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development improvements contemplated by the 1997 Plan, but also includes a few improvements not previously contemplated. Concepts depicted on the Illustrative Plan are considered to be appropriate improvements and activities for the Park. However, all improvements are subject to further review by the Town (conditional use permit, development plan review, DRB review) prior to being implemented.” The Plan further states, “It should also be understood that the improvements being depicted on the Illustrative Plan does not ensure if or when they will be implemented. In many respects, the Illustrative Plan is a vision for how the may be developed and not a commitment to any specific improvement.” To support the images depicted on the Illustrative Plan narrative descriptions of specific improvements are included in the Management Plan. Narrative descriptions are provided in the Plan for improvements on the lower bench of Ford Park such as: • Playground Restrooms (location) • Ford Family Tribute (iconic arrival feature) • Betty Ford Way (widening) • Nature Trail (improvements) • Social Courtyard (gracious, functional entry) • Ticketing/Restrooms/Seating (remodel) • BFAG Education Center (size, height, uses, location, tree preservation, Chronology of Events and Actions June 1995 Town Begins Ford Park Management Plan October 1996 Council allows Vail Alpine Garden Foundation to proceed through process with Educational Center at Soccer Field parking lot (not implemented) April 1997 Ford Park Management Plan Adopted 1999 Lease with Vail Valley Foundation renewed 2008 Lease with Vail Recreation District renewed 2009 Vail transportation Plan Update completed November 2011 Voters approve use of Conference Center Funding for Ford Park Improvements April 2012 Planning and Environmental Commission forwards recommendation of approval on Ford Park Management Plan Amendments. April 2012 Vail Town Council approves Resolution No. 17, Series of 2012, adopting the amendments to the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan. May 2012 Planning and Environmental Commission approves the conditional use permit applications for the Phase I improvements. September 2012 Construction of Phase I improvements begins. 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development January 2013 Vail Town Council grants owner’s consent to BFAG, VVF, and VRD to submit development application for review (5-0) January 2013 Conditional use permit application for Phase II improvements submitted. February 2013 Planning and Environmental Commission was introduced to the Phase II requests at a public work session hearing. March 2013 Final action on Phase II improvements is pending. Overview of the Process Planning documents such as master plans and management plans can be amended from time to time. Criteria and findings have been established for the consideration of a planning document amendment. The criteria and findings include: • The plan was adopted in error. • Conditions have changed since the adoption of the plan. • How would an addition, deletion, or change to the plan be in concert with the plan in general? A planning document amendment can be initiated by the private sector, the Community Development Department or a Town board (Town Council, PEC, etc.). Once initiated, an amendment is reviewed by the Planning and Environmental Commission and a recommendation is forwarded to the Vail Town Council. The Town Council has the responsibility of approving amendment, approving the amendment with modifications, or denying the amendment. Whichever decision is made by the Town Council, it shall be supported based upon the criteria and findings established for an amendment. Planning document amendments are passed by resolution by the Town Council. Conclusions Staff has reached a number of conclusions on the Town’s policy for development in Ford Park and how that policy direction is to be implemented. The conclusions are based upon many factors and considerations. Factors such as: • the information on the master plan history of Vail, • the chronology of events and actions leading up to the submittal of a development application for Phase I (approved) and Phase II (pending) improvements in Ford Park, • and, an understanding of the process to amend a master plan and the review of a development application. Our conclusions are as followings: 1. Ford Park has been the Town’s longstanding solution to providing for the recreational needs of residents of the community and our visitors and guests. 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development 2. The 1985 Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan Park Master Plan, as adopted in 1985, and later amended in both 1997 and 2012, remains relevant and in effect today. 3. The three documents (the Master Plan, the Management Plan and the Management Plan Amendment) are a combined planning document for decision making purposes. 4. The 1997 Ford Park Management Plan articulated six major goals statements aimed at guiding future development decisions. Those goal statements, along with those articulated in the 1895 Master Plan, established the Town’s intentions for development within the Park in 1997. 5. An outcome of the Town’s planning efforts in 1996-97 resulted in the Betty Ford Garden Education Center being relocated out of Ford Park and onto the soccer field parking lot on Vail Valley Drive. 6. The Management Plan amendments adopted by the Vail Town Council in 2012 altered the policy direction for development in Ford Park from what had been established in 1997. 7. Policy direction established by the Town allows “administrative offices” and “education centers” in Ford Park, subject to review, and a finding of compliance with the planning documents. 8. The 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment established illustrative plans and descriptive narrative for “appropriate improvements and activities in the Park.” 9. The illustrative plans and descriptive narrative speaks generally, and specifically, to the development of an education center and amphitheater improvements, among numerous other physical improvements throughout Ford Park. 10. Those development applications for physical improvements which most closely adhere to the implementation strategies prescribed in the Management Plan Amendment have the greatest likelihood of being approved. Process Options for Moving Forward There are three options for the review of the current Ford Park Phase II Improvements application. The options include: 1. Continue forward with the recommendations of the Ford Park Management Plan Amendment and take no action. (no policy concerns/no implementation concerns) 2. Withdraw the Owner’s consent to proceed through the development review process prior to PEC public hearing on April 8th and direct staff to immediately initiate amendments to the master plan and management plan. (policy concerns) 3. Call up/appeal the final decision of the PEC on the development application after the public hearing on April 8th. (implementation concerns) In order to determine which of these options is most appropriate it is important to understand which concerns exist, if any, and why they are of concern. For instance, if the concerns are focused on policy-type of issues, (ie, no new development in Ford Park, RETT funds were used to purchase the park land and should not be used to support private uses, vehicles use within the park should be limited, open space is believed to be 3/19/2013 March 19, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development the most valued use, etc.) then Option #2 should be pursued. By contrast, if the concerns are focused on issues of implementation (ie, a proposed building is too tall, the pedestrian pathway creates conflicts with the varying users, too many trees are being removed, the roof pitches of the restroom building are too steep, the building materials are incompatible, etc.) then Option #3 should be pursued. If there is uncertainty whether any concerns exist at all, then Option #1 should be pursued at this time and allow the development application to move forward. Does the Vail Town Council have concerns with the direction recommended for Ford Park based upon the existing planning documents (1985 Master Plan, 1997 Management Plan, 2012 Management Plan Amendment)? If so, what are the concerns of the Town Council and why are they of concern? Based upon the Town Council’s responses to the first two questions, which of the three options should be pursued in moving forward? 3/19/2013 ORDINANCENO. 6 Seriesof1973 AN ORDINANCEAUTHORIZING THECONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REALESTATELOCATED WITHINTHE TOWNOF VAI L, COUNTY CFEAGLE, STATEOF COLORADO; DESCRIBINGTHEREAL ESTATETO .BE ACQUIRED BY EMINENTDOMAINANDCONDEMNA- TION PROCEEDINGS; AUTHORIZING THETOWN ATTORNEYAND SPECIALLEGA L COUNSE LTO INSTITUTELEGAL PROCEEDINGSFOR THECONDEM- NATIONOFTHESUBJECT PROPERTY; SETTING FORTHPUBLICANDMUNICIPA LPURPOSESAND USES FORTHEREALESTATE TOBE CONDEMNED; ANDSETTING FORTHMATTERSAND DETAILSIN RELATIONTHERETO. r WHEREAS, theTownCouncil FortheTownofVailhas determined that itis necessary and appropriate for thepublichealth, safety andwell- being ofthe townto acquire real estateFor the purpose of creating muni- cipal Facilities forthe use andbenefitofthe residentsoftheTownaF Vail; and WHEREAS, the TownCouncilhasdeterminedthat onlyby acquiring the property describedinthisordinance can it properlyprovide the munici- pal Facilities referredtoherein as well as to preserve For the inhabitants o'FtheTown cultural, educational, and recreationalfacilitiessuch as theaters, civic centers, parks, swimmingpools, skilifts, tennis courts, andotherFaciLitiesof similarcharacterand purpose; and WHEREAS, theTownCouncil hasdeterminedthatthe only real estate undeveloped andstillavailable Foracquisition Farthe purposes set forth in this ordinanceis a parcel ofland lying withinthe corporate boundaries oftheTownof Vail, consisting of approximately 39 acres, moreor less, and being owned by theManorVail Development Co.; and WHEREAS, theTownCounciland itsdulyappointed representatives have diligentlynegotiated topurchase and acquire saidrealestate and having failed to reach an agreement regarding the purchase of said property now deems it necessary and appropriate totakeaction by virtue oftheTown's power of eminentdomaintocondemn satdreal estate; NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT ORDAINEDBYTHETOWNCOUNCIL OF THETOWNOFVAI L, COLORADO, THAT: SECTION1 . Authorization to CondemnRealEstate. TheTown Attorney and special counselfor theTownofVail are hereby authorized anddirected toproceed forthwithto initiatecondemnation proceedings inaccordance withthe applicable [awFortheStateof ColoradoandtheCharter FortheTownofVail by virtueofthe power of eminentdomain conferred upon the TownofVailby theConstitution of theState ofColorado, state statutes and Charter. Thedescription ofthe property authorized tobe acquiredby condemnation is as Follows: Commencing at the Northwest cornerof the Northeast one-quarter of Section 8, Township 5South, Range 80West oftheSixth PrincipalMeridian, County of Eagle, Stateof Colorado; thence 3/19/2013 5.00°01'06"E. and along the WestlineofsaidNortheast one-quarter 583.82feet to a point of intersectionwiththe Southerly right of way of interstate Highway No. 70; thence continuingalong theaforesaid course 347.62feet to thetrue point of beginning; thencecontinuingalong the aforesaid course 118.33 feetto a point ofintersectionwiththe Northerly sineof VailVillage, Seventh Filing; thencealong the sinuosity ofsaid Northerly line: 5.74°03'32"E. , 297.79 feet; 5.19°57'03"E. , 455.47 feet; 5.40°47'03"E,, i71 .46 feet; 5.54°51'34"E., 206.78 Feet; S.$2°25'03"E,, 179.91 feet; N,75°32'26"E., 201 .18feet; N.66°20'58"E,, 581.89 feet; N.68°32'31"E., 861,23 feet; N . 72 ° 29' 19" E. , 223.43feetto a point of intersectionwiththe EastlineofsaidSection 8; thence N.02°30'30"E.. andalong saidEastline 267,62feet to a point of intersectionwiththe Southerlyright of way line ofinterstate Highway No. 70; thence Westerlyalong saidSoutherly right of way Lineand along acurve tothe righthaving a radiusof 5923.00 feet, acentral angle of 1 O°21'20" , anarc distanceof1070.51 feetto a paint of tangent (the chord ofsaid curvebearsS , 88° 14'25"W . a distanceof1069.02 feet); thence N.79°45'29"W. andalong said Southerlyright of way 227.00feet to a point of curve; thencealong said Southerlyright of way and along a curve to the right having a radiusof5900.00 feet, a central angle of 10°22'00", anarc distanceof1067.50 feetto a point of tangent; (the chord ofsaid curve bears N.78°53'39"W, a distance of1068.10 feet); thence N.71 ° 38'54"W, and along said tangent and along said Southerlyright of way 124.00 feet; thence 5.00°01'06"E, , 284.59 feet; thence5.89°58'54"W. , 189.81feet tothetrue point of beginning; containing1,650,243.48 square feet or 37.855 acres , moreorless . SECTION2. Public and MunicipalPurposes, TheTown Councilhereby declares thatthepublic and municipal purposes compelling thedetermination toacquire the property described inSection 1 by condemnation areas follows: a. forpark and greenbelt purposes, b . to preserve thenatural andphysical characterofthe area tobe condemned, c, for bicycle, equestrian and hikingtrails, d, forchildren's playgrounds, e. forperforming artsandcivic center, f, for a skiliftandrelated facilities, g. for picnic areas, h, forrecreationalfacilities such as tenniscourts, swimming pools, gymnasium, iceskating rink, i. fortheaterand assemblyhalls, convention center, public schools, j . for possibleexchange or tradeofthe condemnedland, or a portionthereof, withother property which may more exactly meet theneedsofthe Town. k, to constructandmaintain waterworks, transportation systems, andother public utilities relating tothe publichealth, safety andwelfare. SECTION 3. 5everability ofProvisions, If anypart, section, subsection, sentence,' clause or phrase ofthis ordinanceis for ary reasonheldtobe invalid, such decisionshall not affect thevalidity ofthe remainingportions ofthis ordinance; andthe TownCouncil 2- 3/19/2013 for the Town ofVailhereby declaresit wouldhave passed this ordinance and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any oneormore parts, sections, subsections, senten ces, clauses or phrases bedeclaredinvalid . INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED ANDORDERED PUBLISHED THIS «?~ r~ day pf March, 'I973. ATTEST: Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTEDAS AMENDED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHEDTHIS s.,~'.~„>; day ofApril, 1973. ATTEST: v_iT ! 1J~ TownClerk TOWNOFVAIL ~~ Byj .'~~~ MayoF f~ 3- TOWN OFVAIL 3/19/2013 S. 00°01'06" E, andalong the WestlineofsaidNortheast one-quarter 583 , 82Feetto a point ofintersectionwiththe Southerly right of way ofInterstate Highway 70andthe true point of beginning; thence5.71 ° 38'54"E, andalong said Southerly right of way 324,00feetto a point of curve; thence along said Southerly right of way and a long acurvetothe left having a radiusof5900.00 feet, a central angle of10°22'00", anarc distanceof 1067.50 Feet to a point ( the chordof said curvebears 5.78°53'3a"E, a distance of1066.10 Feet); thence S.79°45'29"E. and along saidSoutherly right of way 227.00 feet to a point; thence along saidSoutherly right of way andalong a curve to the lefthaving a radiusof 5923,00 Feet, a central angle of10°21'20", anarc distanceof 1070.51feet to a point ofintersectionwith theEastlineofsaidSection 8 (the chord of said curve bears N . 88 ° 14'25" E , a distanceof1069.02 Feet); thence S . 02 ° 30'30"W . and along thesaidEastLine 267.62feet to a point ofintersectionwiththe Northerly lineof VailVillage Seventh Filing; thencealong the sinuosity ofthe Northerly line ofVailVillage Seventh Filing: S . 72 ° 29' 19"W .a distance of223.43 feet; S . 68 °32'31 "W .adistanceof 861 , 23 feet; 5.66°20'56"W.a distanceof 581 ,89feet; S, 75°32'26"W,a distanceof 201 , 18 Feet; N.82°25'03"W,a distanceof179.91 feet; N.54°51'34"W,a distance of206.78 feet; N . 40° 47' 03"W .a distanceof171 , 46feet; N,19°57'03"W.a distanceof 455.47Feet; N , 74°03'32"W .a distanceof 297 , 79 Feet to a point ofintersection withtheWestfineofsaid Northeast one-quarter ofSection 8; thence N.00°01'06"W. and along said Westline465,96feet to the true point of beginning; containing 1,700,242,83 square Feet or 39.032 acres, more or less , SECTION 2. Public andMunicipal Purposes, The TownCouncil hereby declares thatthe public and municipal purposes compelling thedetermination toacquire the property described inSection1 by condemnation areas Follows: a, for park and greenbelt purposes, b. to preserve thenatural andphysical characterof the area tobecondemned , c. for bicycle, equestrian and hikingtrails, d, Forchildren's playgrounds, e, forperforming arts andcivic center, F, For a skiliFtandrelated Facilities, g . for picnic areas, h. forrecreational facilitiessuch as tennis courts, swimming pools, gymnasium, iceskating rink, i. for theaterand assemblyhalls, convention center, publicschools, j . For possible exchange or trade ofthecondemned land, ora portionthereof, withother property which may more exactly meettheneedsof theTown, k, t o construct and maintainwater works, transportation systems, andother public utilities relating tothe public health, saFety andwelfare. SECTION 3, 5everability ofProvisions. IF any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance isfor any reasonheldto beinvalid, suchdecision shallnot aFFect the validity ofthe remainingportions ofthis ordinance; andthe TownCouncil 2 - 3/19/2013 C; v_ O C X C s a C S` v, n C_ O n~+ C N n C4 O h i••, I~ co z o G t~ ro f d a W i„ ~` c a m C Q. F Q 0 a 9 W 7 O m C h n 0 5 O CrJ a~ n, rn e• ~ O r-i m C C d R H 1~ 0 9 d N 1 b c P a O a O n C H C m 0 M Q ro c m G. w a Cu O7 ~ yfyq ~ .~.. p.] F• ~O ~ ~ a A _ ro ~. ~ ~m p~ ~, ° ~ 6 n SD A R ~ d Ofl. 0 ~~ C ~' c. ~ °0 K r' m om C'! W O• ~+, .v d 11 R x 1/" ~ ~ m e~! ~ rr W C d " "" '~ CO ~ CO ~' R ' o a O ~ ~ m ~. a' a. ~ n. ~ o ~ m ~• er ro o ~ •a'e a~ ro a. r~ mR _ C O C. y Vi t~ b ~ ~ 0 ~ m anea r: a ~ ,n an. C ~ ro w O. 0 a. %c ~ ~ ~. ac ~tr.w 'rte ~ OcC [Cd ~~, Q.~C ~• C C b v' ~ ~ O ~, ro y ~ y ~ m OC a.d`~Q~w~a'7i, A, ~ CI] O m a` n Q ti 'C rr - t7 ~ C ~ R C ~ W v+' 7 0' ~ ~ ~' C d t] ~ O ~ Cr~ ~ m ~ qOq m ~, :'! w ~ ~ C C ~ owo~r:~e`~7'roe+ a~ eo ~'~ II. A~ "~ ~ ~ n.~ ON t9 R ~. '~ 0 ~ trt d ~ `ti° ~ r'h~mdO p~ Q'~mm~ar'no. n. ~a rya `° `~ ~ ~ O do m ~ p' ~'fl pPg ~C.n y7ro^m~^ r+W ~ ~. a ~ `SCR e. r•+ R 0 O~~ 7 0 e w n C z h C a r CrJ O n r O C 0 v ~..+ v 0 yo J Q r n z n~Cmme~~ma°w,~ ~ 3powoOw~ ~ q»q~i~Ld'~4~F'A~ Q,m~~~6~'~ ~~ ~y - .._.--~- Z 0 :d 5 ~aa~ a~ e a ~ .° e w s a.~" ~ 6 n n c g. "~: .ti'Ca y ~-3HmG7~b'aro Yxytr~lyaazon~~o~xo ~rGZ~S•m ,0 m S~ -• Om ~ x ~" fiiT ~'-. to F.'O mn O ~ ' X9oL~1[i30Cf H 4'~] /~~ O YO•• w" x" o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ n ~ ~a~ ~." c ~ ~ 8 [~ ~e~yv:af .~Gsyn~3*3.,"3 ~9 n~m~ V, G". ,A. 'o Om ~~+ Sw ~ ~',~ piO C.,. ~n n ~ ~ nC~1 -aw',~ O Sm a ~ 7y'-'yr.,t~7r' OU'C,ao'S'Odpepy~a9r7 p O a'°x~ a°,~ A ~ S.m < ~~ -~ A'~,' E.aq ~rro m ~ ~• ~ ~ ,~i o °« E ~ ° ~ my~~ n z~yr~GxO z rt~M~x aao"at:fo o „5:~,n~t~~ S~ ~ "na M y ~ C~1 z'~1x `~'a ~ 8' ~ ~ 5: Y G ~ ~~c~o' a a o~c7 ~ ~'~" m ~^ R. ~>Ct~ ^`w ~ ~R 5'a~ ~ ". q .. Cv~ c ~ a00 n~N an ~. °z a•x0 0~R ~ o' w ~" x ~~ n zr. W ,`~ ~_ p''< w m mm ,°.. o a ... " rn •• ~ „~ n ~ • O R Op ,,, '~ ~• '+ l'ro r O'c `" ,O `3 O. E C] .~'^ a 1+1 nAC wne~am` . Cn.G•'°0..~"subP•'"'d ~1rO .. -"'""' n~P.~S r.i~i:Y~a'~f Coq x'exCxnCyp~{i14za ~,° m ° .. ° ,,, ~. x O m a ~ $ ~ ~ ~a ^. ~ ~' S: '" C n . 6 " mS n 7. y Hw y G1 C1 'A Cpl r" c7 yyH Or~ks ~ m 5 n'o xbcog 5 ~" ~.~" m a ~' p ~" " m'E ~ ~ ° ~' y Cyl7'x~ym~y H'~y~y a~ OxxCY1~,'~ `+ttl y05C~ no_d awa.e moo." ".K ~ mw ao e1~~ +s~. m ~' 'tl ao xm zOx~~rHYz w pq'~ oA r"o.. "'~~ A5~-i,.m~a~ °g~O gr7 .° j ~'~'d~yr'~ww^m~~f yt7y~~~3~ r~aynaat=Jp'~zr9i0-lwx Oyd a~~~ NHnwwosr aa~ye3 o io" "° ° 005 o'oma x7d oz ~ x~,~ a~p.g H C G caT,q o~:~mo.+o,» nr' rj'O ~.-" Eam a ~ rotlmt'Y x O~ n ,° p•wm°'BnE::~ °°~ m oM~S-Sodd i~ ~ pa- ~~ ~mm Rv, ~ 1 v~ ~ E G 00 Off' ~ ZCn"D sOa`{ m~C ~ m S' '~ •+ V ° m5"s~ Or'.~t+ftila9` gZOyro az ~ ~ t~ltsizio qx p ;~ ~ ." m wmK n ° ef ° ° ~°. n °° ~ ~ n ro A fl.p G.rA a~ aa~3 air'" C7Clnpfify'-'a~va09„3m 1q~ e~-w ~~'° " aw00 0 l ~A~ ~~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~] O ert+l C] Z[r7 y.. ~-3 N r ofom~'v'"Keo"n~`D"e~r~ffi .eo~r. +~„ O ~ g ~'~m"ya. HA ro eh O ~a poy t o, ~ w ~; " " C » .-. y ~ o ~ ~ "° 44e a a~ ° CK :°-°A m " ° a« r. ~ ~ S,~ a ~ °..~~. ir~' Cl7zOx[y'~'~m.,9~G~~.,yar~yaz 1'!1h'' C ~~ ~ "m..m «vm ~ R a .Sn ~; 0 0 5 trp o til x ~ xx ~xx l?11~1 -- nK ,. 7 ns ~... ° n o ~ ~ ~ ~ m5 `~ C .... ~ nwro w " .'C , G~ , [ J , ~ ~ ~3 , T C" z .. [ 1 ~ [+f ',] L~ C"xy ~.w,kk.0i,~mo5*C m:°. n.w^'m~.C~ r!°. ......._.. r. y ~ O ns°w~.°i, 7'. r°wp n°n ~.RKA n [~ gw'p~z 7~'Na:.,o~~NOO~:eSe~°,p~.C~.€stcEm~a~'t~lm~~awnzga'~u,ht,P trix~<EmL'Qw"'~~.ooRmtj! rorno3oF.+G mn8tf~sp~Ri~~C~r n~1r~~"~O~o ~~w$'o:'~' o'~o ~iooa atn~'~m~9"~'a"~°~9w'.'°`~Rea a oo~..~°~y~ ~,`"'~ mo~7~K~e5e~m~~^~o5o`'AG~,~y~o~li.-., w~ 01FyOw p~OA~p°im~mcon noS ~ ~ rao" m x0 5: n..., 5..5 u,n OOSOO R~GaS,~ nCn SkOHn aO N ~• m., ~+ ~n 'R ~ :~ °'"'~~° °''°~ w O ,. A O~n n.~ ~ ~o a m ~ MN n ^' - y • p # ~• m x.. 0' ~n w w co m Vl .» ~ ~ W <. .'s' s D ~ ., M " L' vi .. yJ ~ - M q a m Cm ~Mr. Om O p'~', .rn mar+ . m"... m~~rs ~.NOm K~ Ra ty 7 n n• w.7 {A ~'.~ < p,?°P ~+~pO ~~- C~ P n am O y .+ d -. QO m !L p, O oo •-• ' w 0 ~. "' m R. m w z N Mm ~' '. ~., m m 5 ,,, y ~! O a ~ i mVi ~' 7 70Q. O .* 00 .. " ea ~+oe '"aa7' w..°ao::rnm••mao' oo'o~min °. o•m[+f~a,~~C~7~."~ •eo'w m °°mw ,* ne~~4°,~ °° xw .~q ~.., ~ c:a"o°y s ,~ ON A GQ ~'~~N "ma.e 04 ~ O~h+ m~'W.wm ""iyw0° O N .. 41" 0, .+~ ""mxti,,•" 7. w., ..nw Op°~» mAm 1•p ~ p0~°~~. "~~• P' ~ ."+,. ~. 7m a .. ~ m ~. °'Cmpan.w m" rti °'O ~ N~-.O m0 ~ ~ °O ` T ° O[*~i~mm~ nip' Lawn ~ m pw6 -" '"`w~"~ .m„o~°..m 4,n zmn~~; ry-.m,~w»oa; o;~.~' p~+WN~~,a~ _~~o" o~x'Es~oom °"o`"°~ym~ °,~~o~u'~a~~~." ~~O'~~.'n.~0^p ~~p..,~pmCS-.m .'s"^eD ~°eQnd. StC mN~ C' ~"s F+ W'~gj~' m0 .~ n ~~ "~1w W Gu's "'mtl m p ip roC1'gC ma~a e.. w,~m"o4°aoo p' K n" .w .» ~ " ~mfny tlf, ~° iN~. '~ m 3 ~~ Mm,« ok E °'"' ~;wE~ p,w" •c bTs'~*y o$pg9 0 rra~m DOa~~amGw CA'c3 'Ct]~Nwt'Le'wnts'~o ~''•GO ~n~~R: wsl.m N• ~' O~W O ~ ap~M.. .N..pOOm" 'I. nG' nr.n ~'"f0~ OsC a5'" pm'aC nG~w NMt,O°•ti9<~eo C'""„nm « W anN ,FrykO n D~' ~ W,.aOK O On~E0o av,..~, w m 5 .~ a:~+ !~'nw _ _ .,n ., o~,•w'~ ..a' „~ 57~] ~ lRa~O. ~Q p ~~~ A..P mrw .,• 3 ... n MmPO M nn~ ~ m W ~'µOG~t. pa~~~p m,m,RS'w ~, E-.'C, Oy Wm ON .~nN ° ~npt`Q'm P. h1~ 'a77 Rtimonw,C .w ~' ~ A°' m~gK.~ vUJ~'Om ~m S""N~ °wooaww~r~aW Am ooO~m"A tn~ 5 ~nm~.n ".* aA~ AE " m". ry0 O O O `. '[3a "' k .« m Oc s+ „ ~ .~: w ~ ~ m .. 0 ' Fi A. mO ~. " rpi G .. ~° .. ~,o ~...°~ °,m~,.,, .. c„-~ amw a m o..Ew.. cn: .."~~ v'o C ~ pa"R'o~~A n~ a ~cr.. N ° a xos' cnc ~. a{,q°~R~],:a~~roms~eno~...°'°.G•o wrnxo~Ntu ~,,. a°fNraAa s'o °N° o~"o" ~ ~•°~."" eT°~ C o nP O Sn^J ~,WOOO'°R OHO Sm zm ?0 yA WN °„~.+ wO nOmwm ~dw~n ^ P. ,y 4p""Np o. ~w~~c ~ otiwEwp~F"~maoc' Eti-~ '~° 49 ,r~• p`'-J ?,''`550° v'°~~,5'~emomo ~~'oweeoKUS " o,Gn ~mo'+o...bn' ~ oomos~mm'on ~ono~tl°7aw'om~y ~' R.a,",t~M;.m~~pit9.t ~ <ow" °~`"°O.Sop ~o"° o~ooE`~^'~y ~°Sto':Oap.mw,m.w..c~Om,~..,kammm.,,m•wmw kpN. mONw: Oo••NG aO~C~'-'aaan0.r~'Mm wo• ma'.+n •'m an.ow~n..m n~..Nwm..eo'. " w~°m°o"mmn,on~ a 5 H ~r~ °~a5:~°a~.°.5'5'°° rn `. , ru,,;; r. .,°'~ b,,.'' s~a n' ~~ wad = tr~o•~"b'~CZ~~ooR~~~o,<~:~~.;,".yEo~tgn Cr£rQ°'"w`".,~~ROR ~~co•° ,o~y ~~~ n N A•'Aw [4ya~ rserpaC:~,'~am~ ~. ~, p,O n~~,'nn"O~'e"y° O$nw"n'es a'~ ~~~) a a n eai n wo 0 .,. " n ~ ° a g ... Gn °~ ,. s m C`ti~npn' 'om ~;~ o ~ ~' o&' ~n < ,~.~ ii ~w~o~. e'~ ~nr O Irk Jypp.lA ~? `•H~Knn. `~ ~z~n° ~o~.°.p0~~' A ~o~' K° °~. b w,~ x 8' ~~ 1","~94p"~ «v"enr!aotrML''° r„ vm •.~~ ~~. c~~:~'~~'~s ,~~i' .n°'t 5 ~~ nq o ~ m _ zc] a ~ maO,Om~3"'aOC °"~g5'k "~° m r. ~ a ° 3 °' ~ m0~~;3~n E ~ axry.m~+~ w C~~€m ~7A°Rpr~$~ ~.: ,~ g ~ 94p~~9"~2' 4tl aa~~~~"p'OeneRl3.~ w m nC~w `~o ~mksne A~_~'~~~ ~ '~7• L~ i~ !!+_~~~nn CO 7 ~+ ~' n 'cs D n tr' mp w ~ p~ ~ " `: m mn ~ a~ ~ ° ~ m ,.% O. Pr ~ ~ ~:n ~11.~ '~ , ~ ~ i9q ~ ~ dC~ C try ~~ n'~ro~'~'~Md°~O~c 5'm x7 ~ ~°~~ x€ra~° w'g'~ ~ ~ ~~ c ax arrot~any'm~~°c 5'~o~y ,~ ~o°~ ~~ op~~ti. ~ ~.' ~. ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~, r~ O mYm .u0 w ~~ I'O'mC ~, m' ~ k ""~:~ ".~• n a ~' " ~ Mf ~ C7C7 GYOm"y~~ngypawo, c .o i0m qm ~'gw~ ~'~ a• 0. q~, O ~~ C ~ro g~Nti~co.y~Ma°,n °' ~ eN5' ~"a°~~~lr'. ~ ° ~ ~ ~m~ ~~.~~ ap°ae" ogero °amw~~;cEp°$v?~ ~ tt~5m ~~" a~~~r ~'~ ~' ~' ~ r«q.rM nm. Hkarn ..m ~ i- R. do Y'r, mk•y ", ~'~~ ~ nw ~f# ~ 3/19/2013 r i for theTown ofVail hereby declaresitwouldhave passed thisordinance andeach part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrasethereoF, irrespective ofthefact that any oneormore parts, sections, subsections, senten ces, clauses or phrases bedeclared invalid . INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVEDANDORDEREDPUBLISHED THIS ~orF, day ofMarch, 1973. ATTEST: Y Town Clerk r r' i t~ INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTEDAS AMENDED, ANDORDERED PUBLISHEDTHIS 4~,,,~t day ofApril, 1973. ATTEST: Town Clerk TOWNOFVAIL i By ,~6C-,~ ' C~~ Mayo 3- TOWNOFVAIL 3/19/2013 f t, I~ Cn o p -+, n a G. p C.v 19 y x ° ofl .s O ny ~ O t~ o h ~ a ~ a p o a f~ Jn 7.I r rna o I ~ (~ n ~ C o ~ a C7 ~ i• o' ~ Ct] b' I ~ 00. n IAA. ,1 VC n'n t~p ~ ~ 7C in' y ro R Z tOb 7 O. ~ O ~ A O n rpp~y,~p ~O 17 o e mmmw ~ n.~ VJC ~ y ~ H n' ~ p ~/} ti O ~ ~ O ~ m pC" w y~~av~C"d4 c.m y C7w oO ~ ~~ ~~OG ~' t~ I~O O Op r+M p mp GC 9 p `~t~ 7'r. o va ~ ~ °' ~ ~ p aF., NJ oK~~y'a r c ma~°¢ ~a o.y p n n ~ ~ a GO y~p w ~ m b ~~~ ~ m o z i bG.LzJ ~w Q eYy fC ~ ~ ~ p tr rsp ~ n• p ~eD y m w mro T ae.p :.~ w p n G.e+ C re Q. p rr '.T p e9 O rL ~ C .,, Oro -~ a rn fD s S 3/19/2013 y C~ O a x w A\ O l of all O o a 8 ~ m '~ H o f_N R Q 1ry~ 1 O ro o r ~ '~ Jn' 7 { f~ ~ 0. 0 o i,. 7 r ~ A o 9G a C7 0 J ~ d 0 w C C' n O* m O y7 T R Ot`~L ep y ytC a. 2 a R R A r J ~ R r. fD M n. fnD O a+ffI~r r` m O: A' O N R M d a N h M b a S o m O a a d a P'F m y a 1~ w n.a. a~~. o-'`Nm ~-o ~N~xa~~Ot+p,n~ `~~nm ~ n~,~o~~m~°O~'~mmm~-a~47aNo•»p'~o'~~<g~.~ ~•p°'.~,07.'~-~-~~toaa' l... ~' Oto . oa ~ nO .« mae }~~~~ ' 01~+.+~°xr`NO~oa°.~~o~m~6go~xM,o.~m~~~~ qs taiS~+ .~MO~~Kn tl~imnmN,°°. ."'..EL'~i00 CN~pm_oo••~m~ oa. ~ m ~'~o• ~.~~ e~m~a °' r aD~-~~~.;~~~ Vita ~. ~`O~ Q, f i.n " ~x.~. ~`° ~ mM. 7.g ~ O p, ~:O~m~.p0`l UtN fe ° m°m°d~, ~e ~~.~w.`4 ~.aM 0. ,,,, n C ~ j' ~. N ti j.:. O1~~ e° ~C nN a O C. ~~tiZ_sr r ~`°`~ rom ~_ ~ Cm~~= p~dA ~~ HOPIpoi n';,a ~ o~'~"....NC ~~.n m moQ ie o i;L°~ooo ~v+o .texts sQ IL9 ~ e~ !w roIaO is w ~ ' mC PQ. /e m - N M ° .oi. w m ~ ~' m! C~ N.~..'.~, °~ O ~ N w ~ OO A m is O O O C '~~'. m H ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ br~ ~ '~' to m t0 0~4 mw~•a.~m cG. M r C.~ ~ f1p y~„~ oe Q. ~ Vl Fqj ~ ~ ~ pv+1 w yq~Sa]. H 0 eD ~ n' n p. `"1 '~ r..s .7 ~ tD G C ~ mCrJG 0.ArKr, . ~ `~ CiOa ~m~~~a+a 0 p, ~ ~ p~ G a, a a ~~ ~ x'~ m.~ y 004 ~ N ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~t c.04 ~ ~ ~ro as y a o,~o,~~x`~~s~o r. R w K ~ ~ ~• ~ R n p, ~ Qp' ~ a' O R to e+ O. ~ `+~ ~' et e+ W ~ ~ O O7 t~D tpy~a~ a p.'dm m ` c ~ ' m I.r o ¢- R t4 Q ~ (/) f't1 ~ ~ (/~ g y. ~ ~+ Ci7 ~ w ro~o~'~a67ae~o-n g tD 'C N fD ~ i"p ~ ~ t9 H ~ ~" 4 pi w Q ~ ~ ~` y'fra=m~~R°7a~~m:Y~ m E ago ~,~ ~ y x,~a.R°o,~~ m 'e ~, O m .Ow ~ ~O-n ~~y i ~~ ~ ~! -OG O.3~yla. O to y m m C 1 L, r U} a yO J n O~y 1 d m Q b C r w z 3/19/2013 N. 71 degrees 98'64."°.}~•:;and•, along saidtangentagLl alongsaid' Southerlyxlght'~ o} way .;14.00 ', feet; thence , 8: DO depfees01'DB;' , E., • `2$4.68 teat: thence ;.~.`• 89 degt_ees SS'B4" W., 188.81 feetto ', the true ..= Doint ' of " beginning: containing #.,850.243.48' square':; feetor' 37.&66 acres, more or#esa. SECTION ~2.~ -Pub11c ' snitMunicipal Purposes. TheTown. Council herebyde- ciares thatthe public And municipal 1 purposes' c.omD~ng °. Lba'° determi- nation to- aaquire'^ the .. property I! descxlbed to 9aetian1' by,oondemaYlanon ate utollowa::r`; "- - s''' • a. for park and gi+~eabelt proposes, b.~`to. DreNrve•' tha_raatusal and phYaical' charaeter`'ott Wtiaxes to.', be condemned,'"'nv' -L'*M~<<'` , : .c. ; tor bicYcle,! dequesttian: and hikingtrails.' .. ~ ~.: .; -; . d. forch}ldren'sp1aygtounds; ' 'e.~,~ forY~pe~torming'tarts: and 'c[vlc~RCatBY, . 7:; r~:ni!!!!i. /1 .f+4S:. ': .'- ifor s skiliftand relatedfacil[ties; rg: for D[ cnic"areas; - ' ~ ~ ~; . .. ;h. for reareational'facilities`-suchas tennis` atouxts,~-switnmingpools,:gymnasium; Ice:skatingrink,.` 1 i. for' theater-,; pndrraggeitablY halls,4c.,,, :~, t; on~eepfer~~publioschools:1:`"Yor. Dossi111c,.p#Fhat~e~;'oi"`tride'ot'the ooademaAti. ox.a,portioa,f thereof; Mrlth~er~:DxapertY..,which raaY more ex~ agt1Y,~maetLhe'nQeds~ ofthe Towa,~ i" ~+`'~try. to"co~trucL ~sad' kmaiatain~Watez•,warks, z~ tYarisDOZtatioa~ systems;°and othezpublla. utilities relating tto the ,.pdbl# o,;.~enlth., :,sa~ety,,:andSECTION 8. J,BeverabiLLYot,iPro-f visioLsst. .., ~~, : ,~sentetio a#~`~eordixian$ d' ~t~-,io`:bain d;!~ Ygah~ cot atteeith~eidttYo ~jg. DOrtionsof thisoxdince; and `~ the "TownCouncil' for'theTov+nof Yellhereby declare~. itiwould'have.;DOSSedthis ordinance~., andsac part,' section,subsection, senteage~. clauseor phrase thereof; irrespectiveof ,the•:: factthat:.anY~ , one'$oz~:; moxe~,"•,P~s, .~ sections,subsections,+ ~ sentences, 'clauses ; ox phrases be declazed invalid`: ° ` • ' , `" ` ~' INTRODUCED;°~ " Rk.AD,~ AP-PROVED ~~' AND-~`ORDEItED' PUE-LISHED:.' THIB.;tawentiethT. day,'rofxi" .' M:~a"' :~~>r'7'QWNOF'VAII,tg,[ ndaR Hall; .. 5;'fr• '`"''i'ce- ,. ,.. -T_ ownClerk'~,~'': ;;'~: .~?~~~` fra!'~3.."INTRODUCEp,. READ, v"~AP-PRU VED ~' AND:"• ORDERED.:r~' PU8-I. 1SH$1~ ~:,TH19~~„~S'#~ ,April.193 .,~~, ~ ~ . w.~- ,..w :. rr"-..... ~v±~.~a~:.,a~-,.,~',TOWN:OE' VAIL ATTEI I. inda~1 3/19/2013 b MINUTES VAIL TOWNCOUNCIL MEETING October 15, 1996 7:30P.M. Aregularmeeting ofthe Vai[ TownCouncil was held an Tuesday, October 15, 1996, inthe CouncilChambers of the„Vail MunicipalBuilding. Themeeting wascalledto orderat approximately 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT:Robert W. Armour, Mayor Sybill Navas, Mayor Pro-tem Kevin Foley RobFord Mike Jewett PaulJohnston Ludwig Kurz MEMBERS ABSENT: TOWN OFFICIALSPRESENT:BobMcl_aurin, TownManager PamBrandmeyer, AssistantTownManager TomMoorhead, TownAttorney The firstitem ontheagenda was Citizen Participation. Lew Meskimen requested Councilprovide port-a-potties at theEastVailpark because, hesaid, therestrooms wereclosedand the park was getting alotof usage. Lew suggested thatcontractors removing snowfromroofsbe licensedand required to carry liability insurance. Further, he statedthatconstruction atVaiiCommons hasblockedentrancestoSafeway andVaildos Shoneandrequested theTownbegin anotification process, includingsignage. Ite~number two onthe agenda wasOrdinance No. 19, Seriesof199&, firstreading of anordinance correcting Ordinance No. 9, Seriesof 1995, rezoning a parcel of propertylegally described asTractC, Vail Village Seven#h Filing fromGeneral UseDistrict to PrimarylSecondary ResidentialDistrict. TownAttorney Tom Moorhead andTown PlannerDirkMason presented theitemand explained that the purpose ofthe ordinance wastocorrect a typographical errorin the original ordinance. It wasreferenced erroneously asthe "FirstFiling" ratherthanthe SeventhFiling" which iscorrect. The staff recommendation wasto approve Ordinance No. 19, Series of1996 on first reading. PaulJohnstonmade amotionto approve theOrdinance with asecondfromSybill Navas. Avote was takenandthe motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Third on theagenda wasareview oftheFordParkConceptualManagement Plan. Larry Grafel, PamBrandmeyer, Todd Oppenheimer ,andGeorge Ratherpresented thepreliminary plan forthemanagement of FordPark and askedCounci! for theircomments andfeedback. Pam explained that an extensive public process had been completed andthatinput had beenreceived from stakeholder, focus groups andthepublic. Further, thatseveral issues, concernsand solutionshad been identified. Proposed improvements included enhancedshuttlebusservice, streamwalkenrichment ( lighting, landscaping, grade improvements, and signage}, enhancing existing entrances, design andconstruction of acentral routeintothepark, new walkways, signage, trashenclosures, delivery access, Nature Center walkingpath, improveplayground tomeet safety standards, Streamwalk to Lionshead, Frontage Roadvehicular access, landscaping and paving ofparking lot. V~pine GardensDirector, HelenFritchpresented an overviewof a proposed educationcenterto be located at the ccerfieldparking lot. JoeStauffer discussed summer parking andscheduling for conflicting uses. He proposed afee forclosein parking and encouraged use ofthestreamwalkto accessthe park, anddiscussed theoriginal intentwhenthe park wasfirst purchased. TomSteinberg was unsupportive of any additionalparking regardless of whether ornot it was underground, and furtherstatedthatpaving was long overdue. He stressed nofurtherurbanizationshould occurand suggested improvedsigning couldsolve manyproblems. RossDavis questionedoverlapping events, general management of the park, and made some parking recommendations. He also suggested furthersubstantialchanges tothe park be put to avoteofthepeople. FloSteinberg expressed herfeeling thatparking should beleft as is, andrequested Councilnotmake a decision ontheAlpine Gardenproposal until moredefinitive plans were presented. Comments werealso heardfromHerman Staufer, BartCuomo, Jim Lamont, Lew Meskimen, andJustinKirkland. In response to public comment andthe presentation fromstaffthefollowing commentsfromCouncil were forming. Kevin stated accessremains anissueofftheFrontage Roadandagreed withall oftheproposed improvements in the Primary Action Plan. Inregard to the educationcenter, Kevin feltthe soccer field wasa good site, that itshould be landscaped, buried, etc. and shouldhave a parking component. 1 VailTownCouncilEveningMeating MinutesOctober15, 1896 3/19/2013 Y+ ti Ludwig Kurzstatedthat he would Piketo exploreclosing theFrontage Roadinordertopark cars whenthere are multiple events inthe park andalthough the non-profitsuggestion formonetary and charging and charging for close inparking wasan interesting idea, he thought there could be a police issue asfar asenforcement. Inregard tothe educationcenter, the soccerfieldis a potentiallygood sitebutthereshould be no netlossof parking andin fac#, with anadditional structure, there shouldbe a gain. P~Johnston agreed withbothofthe formerCouncilmembers stating the educationcentersiteat the soccerfield m sense, but he wasinterestedin working with thenon-profit groups to manage close inparking, buthefeltthe streamwalkcompletion fromFord ParktoLionshead was extraneousand shouldbeeliminated. RobFordagreed withthe formercomments andagain supportedpositioning theeducation centerinthe soccer field parking lot. MikeJewett agreed with the locationoftheeducation centerinthe soccerfieldparking lot, but was against non- profits "taxing" citizensforthe use of a public area. Heencouraged better useofthe VTRCfor parking andstrongly encouragedlegislation requiring that allleasesshould beadoptedby ordinance sothat they can be referred back to thepeople when futureCouncilsget out offine andmake decisions that are notinthepublic interest. Sybill Navas agreed theeducation center wassitedwell inthe soccerfieldparking lotand encouragedzoning the park toprovide asacrosanctenvironment. She also had concerns about accessandstated there isstill some confusion aboutwhether parking in Fard Park shouldbeparkparking orskierparking ora combinationof both. She furtherstated thereshouldbe exclusive useof the VTRC in providingparking and weshouldget ridofall parking currentlyprovided atthepark andturnthatparking lotintosomething moreaesthetic and pleasing. Shetoagreed withPaulJohnston thatthestreamwalk completion fromFord ParktoLionshead wasextraneous tothis process andshould beremovedand that weshouldconcentrate on using VailValley Drive for additional parking andlorfor access through a pedestrian sidewalk. She agreed the 6:00 a.m. to9:00 a.m. vehicle delivery to thepark was unorkableand ratherthan # aking ona management roleinschedulingoverlapping events, cautionedthat with coon senseandcourtesy, better coordinationcould be workedoutinthepark. BobArmour concludedthe commentsbystating hewanted toSee Ordinance No. 6, Series of1973, the origination ordinance forcondemnation of thisparcel amended toreflect current usesand expectations forthepark. Parking is an issuehe stated, butshould bemanagedthroughsigns andalso encouragedsaving evenadditionalparking fortheelderly, handicapped and vehiclesthat are required for special events. He encouragedpaving thesurface ofthe lot and maybe even using RETTfunds todo so. Inregard totheeducation center, hefeltthe soccerfield was an appropria#e site, again with nonetloss ofparking. Agenda itemnumberfour was a report fromtheTownManager. BobMcLaurin statedthatthelibrary chute road project wason timeandwould becompletedby thetimethe snow flies. Also the TRC waslikewise ontime and should beready forpublic access by Thanksgiving. Dowd Junction was movingalong and he said inregard to the Safeway entrance confusion, thishasturnedinto a largerproject than anticipated, itisthestorm sewer project as well as preparation for theadditional lanethatwill runtothesouthofSafeway andVaildos Shone. The contractor isworking very hardtomake suretheproject iscomplete. Thefinalitemofhisreport was to remind Council that VailTomorrow isscheduled farthe nexttwomeetings onNovember1st and2nd. There being nofurther business a motion was madeforadjournment and themeeting was adjourned at approximately 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Rdbert W. Armour, Mayor ff~/JCHoll~llcCrr+utcheon,:.Town ClerkY Minutes takenby Pam Brandmeyer Names ofcertainindividuals who gavepublicinput may beinaccurate.? i 2 VailTownCoundleveningHeeling Minutes Octoder 15, 1886 3/19/2013 VAILTOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1996 7:30P.M. INTOVCOUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA NOTE: Timesofitems areapproximate, cannot berelied upon to determine atwhattime Council will consider an item, and subject tochange. 1 •CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. (5mins.) 2•Ordinance No. 19, Seriesof 1996, first reading of an ordinance correcting TomMoorhead Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1995, rezoning a parcel of property legally DirkMason described asTract C, VailVillage Seventh Filing from GeneralUseDistrict to Primary/Secondary ResidentialDistrict. (5mins.) ACTION REQU€STEDOFCOUNCIL: Adopt OrdinanceNo. 19, Seriesof 1996 on first reading. BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Thisis correctionof a typographical errorin theoriginal ordinance. It was referenced as the "First Filing" rather thanthe Seventh Filing" whichiscorrect. 3•Review ofFordPark Conceptual Management Plan. (1hr.) Larry Grafel Pam Brandmeyer ACTINR UESTEDOFCOUNCIL: Discuss/comment on the Todd Oppenheimer conceptual outlinefortheFord ParkManagement Plan. George Ruther BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Therehas been an extensiveand extended public process thatincluded stakeholder, focus groups and thepublic. Severalissues/concerns andsolutions havebeenidentified andwillbe presented fordiscussionand comment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Comment, modify or addto the conceptual plan forthe management ofFordPark. 4•Town Manager's Report. (10mins.) 5•Adjournment - 9:00 p.m. NOTE UPCOMINGMEETING STARTTIMES BELOW: ALLTIMES AREAPPROXIMATEANDSUBJECTTO CNANGE) IIIIIII THENEXT VAILTOWN COUNCILSPECIAL WORKSESSION WILL BEON TUESDAY, 10129/96, BEGINNINGAT5:30P.M. INTOVCOUNCILCHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWINGVAIL TOWNCOUNCIL REGULARWORKSESSION WILL BEON TUESDAY, 1115196, BEGINNINGAT 2:00P.M. INTOVCOUNCIL CHAMBERS. THENEXTVAIL TOWNCOUNCIL REGULAREVENING MEETING WILLBEON TUESDAY, 11/5/96, BEGINNING AT7:30P.M. INTOV COUNCILCHAMBERS. I IIIIII Sign languageinterpretation available upon request with24hournotification. Pleasecall479-2332 voice or 479-2356TDD forinformation. C:VIGENDA.TC 1 3/19/2013 PUBLIC NOTICE VAILTOWN COUNCILMEETING Tuesdav. October22. 1996 Work session NOMEETING Signlanguageinterpretation availabie uponrequest with24hournotification. Pleasecall479-2332voice or 479-2356TDDforinformation. 3/19/2013 Agenda lastrevised10/15/96 8am PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, October 14, 1996 FINAL AGENDA Project Orientation / Lunch - CommunilyDevelopment Department 12:30 pm QUORUM - ( October 28, 1996) SiteVisits 1:15 pm 1.lot P-2 2.Savoy Villas Driver:Dirk PublicHearina - Town CouncilChambers 2:00 p.m. 1.A request fortwo 250's, inordertocontruct a Type II EHU, located at 1225Westhaven Lane/Lot43, GlenLyon Subdivision. Applicant:Sentry Construction, represented by Pam Hopkins Planner: George Ruther/MikeMollica MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: JohnSchofield VOTE: 6-0 ( Golden absent) APPROVEDWITH NOCONDITIONS 2.Arequest for a major subdivision ofLot P-2, Block3, VailVillage FirstFiling, and a vacated portion ofHansonRanchRoad. The siteisgenerally located eastofVailValley Drivebetween HansonRanchRoadand GoreCreek Drive. Acomplete legaldescription isavailable inthe CommunityDevelopment Department. Applicant:P-2 Association, represented by ArtAbplanalp Planner: George Ruther/Dirk Mason MOTION: Greg Amsden SECOND: Henry Pratt VOTE: 6-0 APPROVEDWITH TWOCONDITIONS 3.A request for a major SDDamendment toallow for amodification to Savoy Villas, ofSDD #5, iocatedat 1230LionsridgeLoop/Savoy Villas, Phase IIandIII. The site isgenerally located east ofTimberRidgeApartments, west ofSimba Run, northoftheNorthFrontage Road and southof LionsridgeLoop. Afull legaldescription isavailable inthe Community Development Department. Applicant:BWAB, Inc., representedby ChrisKlein Planner:DominicMauriello/Mike Mollica MOTION: Henry Pratt SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 6-0 TABLEDUNTILOCTOBER28,1996 3/19/2013 Agenda last revised 10/15/968am 4.A request for aninterior remodei to add abedroomand abathroom of approximately 250 square feet, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, locatedat1776 Sunburst Drive #9Nail GolfCourse Tovunhomes. Applicant:Anne & PeterMounsey and Joan & Marcella Fox Planner:Lauren Waterton STAFF APPROVED 5.A request for an exterior addition to amasterbedroom andbathroom and adding a3rd floor, utilizing the250Ordinance, located at8026 PotatoPatch/Lot4, Block 1, VailPotato Patch. Applicants: PadraicDeighan andBirgit Toome Planner:Dominic Mauriello TABLEDUNTIL OCTOBER28, 1996 6.Information Update: FordPark Management Plan update - Larry Grafel Geologic HazardReportupdate - DirkMason 7. Approval ofSeptember 9, 1996andSeptember 23, 1999minutes Theapplications andinformation abouttheproposals areavailab{e forpublic inspection during regular office hoursinthe project planner's officelocatedatthe TownofVail CommunityDevelopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Signlanguage interpretation available uponrequest with 24hour notification. Please call479-2114voice or479-2356 TDDfor information. CommimityDevelopmentDepartment Published October11, 1996intheVailTrail. 3/19/2013 Agenda lastrevised 10/9/968am PLANNINGANDENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, October14, 1996 AGENDA Project Orientation / Lunch - GommunilyDevelopment Deuartment 12:30 pm QUORUM - (October 28, 1996) SiteVisits 1:15 pm 1.LotP-2 2.Savoy Villas Driver:Dirk Public Hearing - Town CouncilChambers 2:00 p.m. 1.A request for two 250's, inorder tocontructa Type IIEHU,. located at1225Westhaven Lane/Lot 43, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Sentry Construction, representedby PamHopkins Planner:George Ruther/Mike Mollica 2.A request for a major subdivisionofLotP-2, Block 3, Vail Village FirstFiling, and a vacated portion ofHansonRanchRoad. Thesiteisgenerally located east of VailValley Drive between HansonRanchRoad and GoreCreek Drive. A completelegaldescription isavailable inthe CommunityDevelopmentDepartment. Applicant:P-2Association, representedby ArtAbplanalp Planner:George Ruther/DirkMason 3.A request for a major SDDamendmenttoallowfor amodification to SavoyVillas, ofSDD #5, located at1230 LionsridgeLoop/Savoy Villas, PhaseIIandIII. Thesite isgenerally located east ofTimberRidgeApartments, west of Simba Run, northoftheNorth Frontage Roadand southofLionsridge Loop. Afull legaldescription is available in theCommunityDevelopment Department. Applicant:BWA6, Inc., representedby Chris Klein Planner:DominicMauriello/MikeMollica 4.A request for an interiorremodeltoadd a bedroomand abathroomofapproximately 250 square feet, utilizing the250Ordinance, locatedat1776Sunburst Drive #9NailGolfCourse Townhomes. Applicant: Anne & Peter Mounsey andJoan & MarcellaFox Planner:LaurenWaterton STAFF APPROVED 3/19/2013 Agenda lastrevised10!9/968am 5.A request for an exterioraddition to a masterbedroomandbathroomandadding a 3rd floor, utilizing the250Ordinance, locatedat802BPotatoPatch/Lot 4, Block1, VailPotatoPatch. Applicants: PadraicDeighan andBirgit Toome Planner:DominicMauriello TABLEDUNTIL OCTOBER 28,1996 6.Information Update: FordPark Management Planupdate - Larry Grafel Geologic Hazard Reportupdate - DirkMason 7.Approval ofSeptember 9, 1996andSeptember 23, 1999minutes The applications andinformationabout the proposals areavailableforpublicinspectionduringregular officehours intheprojectplanner's officelocatedat theTownofVail CommunityDevelopment Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Signtanguageinterpretation available uponrequest with24hournotification. Pleasecall 479-2114 voice or479-2356TDDfor information. CommunityDevelopment Department PublishedOctober 11, 1996 intheVailTrail. 3/19/2013 r Vail Village Merchant Association POBox 2135, Vail, CO 81658 tm P 3/19/2013 We, thebelowsigned merchantswouidlike torestructure theallocation ofVailVillage's Business Licensefee. We wouldliketowithdraw a portion oftheamount currently allocated totheVVTCB, thentotheMarketing Board. Through theVail Village MerchantAssociation wewould like toseemore promotions, marketing andspecial events specifically directed at theVail Village. Owner/Manager Business Name Name AddressPhone Signature U,~~~v~u 7C~~ ~ q o z.. :r ~c.1 ~t3 z . ~ ~ C~~ k 4a t., lo i K I22-r C)o Ir i f%» i /F~, C~/ l ~G`> oti=7-.7 G= . ~ i rF~ r`D ir-% f~ 7 r c~C-'j~ / ~ z j 3/19/2013 We, thebelow signed merehants wouldliketorestructure theallocation ofVail Viliage's BusinessLicense fee. Wewouldlike to withdraw a portion ofthe amount currentiy allocated tothe VVTCB, then tothe Marketing Board. Through theVailVillage MerchantAssociation wewouldlike to seemore promotions, marketing andspecial events specifically directedat theVail Village. Owner/ManagerBusiness Name Name Address PhoneSignature jCGLS4~<1` n7-~ C,.F~77(2 l° c~ P_~-- L4 L 3/19/2013 onof VailVilla -We, the belowsigned merchants would liketorestructuretheaIlocati ge's Business Licensefee. Wewould liketo withdraw a portion of theamount currently allocated tothe VVTCB, then to theMarketing Board. Through theVail Village Merchant Association wewouldlike to seemore promotions, marketing andspecial events specifically directedat theVail Village. Owner/Manager Business Name Name Address Phone Signature 2!/*z iejg L. 440K~.~c/O ON FicavraG c~ Rv 7G-~ 7J~I GR4VL 2J. a-~.s y~~' -'q9 ~ CJw ~ criqd ~C~ nss /c~ 4--,i1 r'o Cen FL----1 ZZ E- !-Cc1LZcrzv2~Z21- 61 cF Jd't CF- a// o0J 40 s. Fiu&I*Y) 4 - z cti c~ ~L % >u -c~ I ~ieJ o w 76 a~-/i- 0 CbA I/ '1~ I Lr~,_ L k 4-76 4351 L 3/19/2013 We, the belowsigned merchants wouldliketorestructurethe allocationof VailVillage's BusinessLicensefee. We wouldlike towithdraw a portion ofthe amountcurrently allocated to theVVTCB, thento the Marketing Board. Through the VailVillage Merchant Association wewouldlike to seemore promotions, marketing andspecial events specifically directedatthe Vail Village. Owner/Manager Business Name Name AddressPhone Signature S"' Y t( L fi 3/19/2013 We, the belowsigned merchants would like to restructuretheallocation ofVail Village's Business Licensefee. We would liketowithdraw a portion oftheamount currently allocated tothe VVTCB, then totheMarketing Board. Through theVail Village MerchantAssociation wewould liketo see more promotions, marketing and special events specifically directed attheVailVillage. Owner/Manager Business Name Address Phone Sinature N e 61 VSar~-- 7Z. 5 H1r lS-1--, a S ~ yv~ o_~c. a~-~~.6~?-ro 22s Wb~a ~b ti i'v~~ cL 3/19/2013 We, ihe below signed rnerchants would like 1orestructure theallocalion ofVail VifEage's Business License tee. We would like to withdraw a portion ofthe arnaunt currently allocaled tothe VVTCB,Markeling eovendts y ThrougF? the Vail Village Merchant Association we wouidliketo seemore promoUons, m 9 and spe specifically direcled atihe Vail Village. Owner/Manager Business Name Address Phone Signature Name f95 dlti~ GV~1~(Sriv 72 7771 r 7 rm rt~j iavQrt zq r 3/19/2013 IJ~ We, thebelowsigned merchantswouldlike torestructuretheallocationofVail Village's Business Licensefee. We wouldliketo withdraw a portion ofthe amount currently allocated tothe VVTCB, then to the Marketing Board. Through theVailVillage MerchantAssociation we wouldliketo see more promotions, marketing and special events specifically directed attheVail Village. BusinessName OwnNaae ager AddressPhone Signaturem u3 S 4 3/19/2013 We, the belowsigned me reslructure the allocation of Vat~CBe thento Ihe fee. Board. f rchants would like to ortion otthe amount currently allocated tot e LL We wauld like to withdraw ap f~terchant Association we would {;keto see more promotians, marketing and specia evens Through the VailViltage specilically directed at the VailVitlage. phOne Signalure4wner/Manager Address Business Name Name er el) Me-&.d6 t4 y47& oz W L osa 3-m ~ LW U n 3/19/2013 Vail Village Merchant Association POBo. 2135, Vail, CO 81658 October 10, 1996 The following is a proposal totheVailTown Council regarding theVail Valley Tourism and ConventionBureau, the Vail ValleyMarketing Board andtheBusiness License Fee. The hope is thattheselong termgoals can bereached by the1998budget year with someinterimsteps achieved during the courseof the next 14z months. 1. The nameof theVVTCBbe changed totheVail Valley Tourism andConvention Bureau VTCB) orareturn to the formerVRA. 2. The nameoftheVail ValleyMarketing Boardbe changed tothe•Vail Marketing Board VMB). 3. Allactivities of the VTCBbefocused onthe Town of Vail. 4. All marketing by the VMBbetocused on theTown ofVail. 5. Al1seats onthe VMBbe filled by Vailbusiness owners ortheirrepresentatives. 6. Theiris nointentiontoreplace the staffateither theVTCB or the VMB. 7. TheVTCBshallretain itsrole asadministrators of the VMB andberesponsible for the implementation ofthe changed focus. 8. Business license-fees .,,vill. support-the _changPd=.marl-,eting effort. 9. The funding contribution made by the TownofVail will continue or beincreased. 10.An appeal --crilibe macle to. Vail. Ass.ociatesto continuQ their support. If pro-rated on thecurrentestimates, thatwould be 65% oftheir current funding. 11. Anappeal willbemadetothe business community, ie. the lodging community, toincrease their support when- ever possible. 3/19/2013 r We wouldsuggest that there are several reasons topursue this lineof reasoning, not theleastofwhich is that the current approach doesnot seem tofall within the original definition of theordinance. i'heordinance clearly states thefunds tobe used for".... the purpose ofmarketing and promoting the Town ofVail andits environs....". Environs as definedby Webster's New Y7orld Dictionary is thedistrictssurrounding a city, its suburbs. It is3ifficult to imagine that either Avonor BeaverCreE:k would qualify as asuburb ofVail orthat they wou:.d agree to such alabel. Bt.t more tothe point is our necessity atthis time to now simply focus in a newbut actually olddirection. Itis an attempt to bring the center of ourati:entionback toVail so thatthe funds raisedin our c:ommunity and by our bus-i- nessesgo to promote otLr community and our businesses. We urge theTown CoL.ncil tomake thedecisior? now for the d:irection to betaken for1998. Ii: thedecision `.SmarE: now, theTOV, the'`VVTCB, the VVMBandthe business commu- nity willhavethe next 141/2 monthswithin which toachieve asmooth transition ofboth philosophy and personnel. Inthe interim, the suggestion would be: l. Toredefine the assignment ofBoardofDirector seats on theVail Valley Marketing Board. It is ourrecommendation thattheseats befilledby areain direct proportion to thefunds collectedfrom that area. For example:l seat for every $50,000.00 incontribution. BCRA 181,000 4 seats Avon 50 , 000 1 seat..; VA116,000 2seats Vail 191,000 4seats BusinessLic. 345,000 7seats y TheBusiness License •sea~ts'Yshould .b.e .f.urfher '.broken'.down toreflectthe areas in.which they werecollected_ 2. o rewrite the BusinessL•icense fee ordinance so that the funds no longer areautomatically allocated tothe VVTCB and theVVMB. Thiswould provide a good faith gesture to the merchants andatthe same.tinie solve any conflict with theordinance. This would require asimultaneous commitment toleave the fundsinplace for 1997. The objective ofthis exercise is to remove theBusiness Li- cense Feefrom amandatedfunding source to avoluntary contribution until thechange overtakes place. 3. To distribute a portion of thosefunds tothe VailVillage Merchants' Association forthe followingpurposes: 30,000 to fund Turn It Up! Vail97 in conjunction withthe Lionshead Merchants 15,000 to fund a shoppingguide also in conjunction withthe Lionshead Merchants. 3/19/2013 FORDPARK MANAGEMENT PLAN PURPOSE TONIGHT o PROVIDE INFORMATION o SOL1CIT COMMENTSAND FEEDBACK o D/SCUSS /SSUES 3/19/2013 FORD PARKy MANAGEMENT PLAN TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA o Review ofthe PublicProcess Prob/em Definition Givens Goals and Objectives Project Timeline o Feedback Stakeho/ders Focus Groups o Discuss Management Plan Framework Preservation FacilityOperations N Loading & Delivery N Access N TrashRemoval Maintenance Coordination & Scheduling Capital lmprovement Plan Financial Responsibilities Issues Parking A/pine Garden Proposal 3/19/2013 FORD PARK MANA GEMENT PLAN EPR:COBLEM STATEMENT Ford Park currently accommodates a wide variety of recreational and cultural uses withinitslimited 39 acre area. These uses, whichtake place almost exclusively during the5 month period of May to September, include outdoor recreation, softball fieids, tennis courts, soccer fie/ds, concerts andotherperformances, a/pine gardens, an historical school house, nature center, walking paths, picnic pavillion, playground, administrative offices, park user andskier parking, special events, loading and delivery, trash removal, bicycling, fishing , andwhite water sports. No comprehensive decision-making framework currently exists for evaluating present or future management and park use issues, which results in an arbitrary andinconsistent management process. How willtheTown ofVail manage multiple, and sometimes conflicting uses, within or improvements to Ford Park andits infrastructurein amanner consistent with ownership and stewardshipresponsibilities? 3/19/2013 FORDPARK MANA GEMENT PLAN FPR~COJECT GIVENS o TheTown ofVailisthe ownerof FordPark. As owner,- theTown must manage its assets responsibly. o Assuming responsibility means managing the park in a way thatfulfills our moral, ethical, legal, financial, and safetyobligations. Ourmora/ obligation involves good conductand behavior; our ethical obligation involves our princip/es and standards; our financia/ obligation involves ourmanagement of revenue, costsandother resources; our legal obligation involves statutes and contractural commitments; and our safetyobligation involves freedom from risk, danger, orinjury to the public andthe town's employees. o TheVail TownCouncilwill be responsib/e for making thefina/ decision on the FordPark Management P/an. o There are existing legal interests affecting the useof FordPark. Currentinterests are held byVVF, VAG, VRD, utility company easements, CDOT andother rights-of-way. oAllideas for use and management ofthe park willbe considered. o CDOTapprova/ willbe required forall alternatives involving frontage road access. 3/19/2013 FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES o Creating a/ong-term visionforthe park. o Determing the "carrying capacity" ofthe park. o Crafting solutions tospecific site problems. How do we... provide sufficientparking to accommodate uses andactivities? get people fromthe village tothe park? allowfor acceptable internal circulation of pedestrian, service, and emergency vehicles ? resolve conflictsbetween users ? meet CDOTrequirements for highway access? o Defining re/ationships betweenstakeho/ders andthe genera/ public withtheTOV as / andlord, TOV as facilitator, andTOV as steward. o Developing a decision-making frameworkfor evaluating present andfuture management andpark use issues. o Defining financial obligations and opportunities. 3/19/2013 r FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN PROCESS TIMELINE October 15, 1996 Conceptua/ Review of preliminary plan framework by Vail Town Council. November 18, 1996PECRevie w of final p/an December 17, 1996 PresentationofFinal recommended plan to thePublic and Town Council for approval 3/19/2013 r FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN Extract from Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1973, signed April 3, 1973, defining the reasons for purchase ofthe park. Section 2. Public andMuniciaal Puraoses. The TownCouncil hereby declares thatthe public and municipa/ purposes compelling the determination to acquire the property describedinSection 1 by condemnation are as follows: a. forpark and greenbelt purposes, b. to preserve the naturalandphysical characterofthe area tobe condemned, c. forbicycle, equestrian and hiking trails, d. for children's playgrounds, e forperforming arts and civic center, f, for. a skilift andrelated facilities, g. forpicnic areas, h. for recreational facilitiessuch as tennis courts, swimming poo/s, gymnasium, ice skatingrink, i. for theatre and assemblyhalls, convention center, public schools, j. for possible exchange or tradeofcondemned /and, or a portion thereof, withother property which may more exactly meet the needsofthe town, k. to constructand maintain waterworks, transportation systems, andother public utilities relating topublic health, safety, andwelfare. 3/19/2013 FORD PARK - MANAGEMENT PLAN What was said.... About Open Space.... Improve quality ofgreen space.., underground potential for thepark and municipa/ services. " Are we trying to cramtoo muchinto a given area?" We'reproviding everything for everybody reduce uses andtake advantage ofthe park's naturalaspects." Fabulous asset asis. " Responsible stewardship, Don't screwit up!" Leavethe park asis. Don't ruin it. Take our stewardship seriously. " Ensure thatthe "whims" of a future group(s) will not _ erodethe original intent forthepark. " Howdo we reconcile current useswiththe original intent?" Maintain open space, remain asis. Keep CentralPark theme andprotection. " Don't loose anygreenspace. " Origina! 1970'svision still applies. " Rezone currentlyundeve/oped portion which then becomes sacrosanct. " 3/19/2013 FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN What was said.... About access..... There is no real entrance, where isthefrontdoor?" Entrance off ofthe Frontage Roadishideous. " Must complete thestreamwalkand advertiseit. It should run fromthe park to Lionshead.. " No new roadsin the park. More paths areok. " Must be accessible to everyone andtoall venues. " Itis great notto have a front door, access through a variety of ways iswonderful, " Access is more theissuethan parking. " Must incentivize alternative access opportunities." Each entranceshould beattractive." Exp/ore better connectionstothe park. " There are conflictsbetween vehiclesand pedestrians. " 3/19/2013 FORD PARK J MANAGEMENTPLAN What was said..... Aboutthe EducationCenter..... -" ECis a good addition if done right- underground, not toobig. " l have no strongfeelings abouttheEC. The garden is a show place. " Noadditiona/ surface structures- new structureslead to expanded uses. " Has anyone considered using theo/dschoo/ house?" What isthe anticipated number ofvisitors? I'm concerned abouttheedifice complex. The nature center andtheEC seem like a nice tie in. "I Venuesthat are integrated shouldbe together. Across theroad defeatsthe purpose." Whatisthe A/pine Garden's philosophy on theEC? What are they trying to accomplish Thisisproposal number one, what's next?" Underground EC in garden is good andis the oniy opportunity that existsfor deve/opment inthe park. " 3/19/2013 FORD PARK MANAGEMENTPLAN What was said.......... About Parking... Parking is an ongoingissue/prob/em. " A structureshould beinvisible underground." Let athleteswa/k and reserve parking for concert goers. " Existing parking lot accessisallmessed up, ratty, don'tknow where toturn. " This group is notsaying a parking structure is a must, butgood access is. " Only surfaceskierparking.. is an existing use. " The gravel lotis ugly---go verticalinto the hill. " No idea on location, just underground parking that works. " Use oftheVTC and stream walkiswiserthan spending $12 million ona structure." Isthe parking issue thenumberof spaces or proximity to the park?" 3/19/2013 FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN WHAT WEHEARD..... 1. Open and greenspace was why the park was bought andisstill an important functionofthe park andthetown shou/dn't "screw it up" by over deve/oping it. Thecharacter ofthe park isfinethe way itis. None ofthe current uses shouldbe discarded. 2. The multiple access points and means intothe park area good thing. However, they arenot as convenient, easy to use, easy to find, or attractive as they couldbe. Circulation withinthe park is alsoinconvenient andreducesthebest useofthe park. Non vehicular meansof accessshouldbe promoted such asmass transit andwa/kpaths. 3. Consistent withthe urging to " not screwit up" by over developing the park, comments regarding the proposedA/pine Gardens education center related to theimpacts on the park. Many ofthe comments were actuallyquestionsindicating the concept was not well understood. Some thought theeducation center was a duplication of, or at leastconsistent with, thefunctionofthe NatureCenter. Most agreed if theeducation center is going to exist, it mustbe adjacent to orwithin the gardens. 4. Parking is a serious problem at thepark. Theso/ution probably invo/ ves morethan one aspect. lmproving busserviceandthe wa/king connections are part ofthesolution. On-site parking, if expanded, shou/dbe underground with greenspace on top. The probab/e best location forthis structureisthe existing gravel lot. The townshould not be financiallyresponsib/e forproviding day skierparking whileVA sells spaces at Go/den Peak. Winter parking use shouldbe compatible withwinter activitieswithinthe park, and / or emp/oyee parking. 3/19/2013 FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN PLAN FRAMEWORK lA.reservation nes. Delineate areas within Ford Parkwith particular aesthetic or environmental significance as preservation zoneswhere nofurther development may occur. Changezoning ofthese areasto mostrestrictive zone district/classification possible. B. Draft legislation which establishes: 1. Allowable uses withinthe park. 2. Design guidelines and minimum constructionstandards. 3. Set maximumsizesforprojects or buildings thatcouldbe allowed. III. Facilit O erations A. Loading and Delivery. Lessee's operating facilities withinFord Park are required to minimize vehicular intrusions into the park. All deliveriesand loading willbe scheduled to occur between thehoursof 6 am and9 am. Allvehicles must be outofthe park areas by 9 am. Alllessee's willprovide adequate space within their facility toaccommodate storage requirements. B. TrashRemoval. Lessee's operating facilities within FordPark are required to utilize a centralized trash/refuse collection andpickup facility. No individual trash dumpsters willbe allowed. All outdoortrash or recycling receptacles will beof an approved animalproof desian. 3/19/2013 r FORDPARK MANAGEMENT PLAN PLAN FRAMEWORK (contd) C. Maintenance. Primary access routesto all buildings, structures, andfacilities areto be swept, cleared of snow and ice, and repaired ona routinebasis. Primary access routes areto be designated by the Director ofPublic Worksand Transportation. All buildings, structures, andfacilities are toreceive routine maintenance to include painting, staining, cleaning, debris removal, landscapemaintenance, etc. to ensure they remainin a safe, serviceab/e, anduseable condition. D. Coordination and scheduling. All events and activities programmed by the Townof Vail orthelessee's will bebased ona master schedule preparedby the Director ofPublic Worksand Transportation (PW/T). Overlapping events which create parking demands whic exceed space and transitservice capacities wili not be allowed. Requests for scheduling will bemade to the Director ofPW/T no / essthan one month and nomore than12 months prior tothe requested date. TheTown Council will establish priorities ifthere are conflicts. 3/19/2013 ti a FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN PLAN FRAMEWORK contd) lll. Financial Responsibilities A. Stakeho/ders willcontinue tobe responsible forthe financing of repair, maintenance, and improvements to their existing facilities. B. TheTown ofVailwillcontinue to provide existing municipal services tothe park. C. Public and privatepartnerships willbeformed to finance any future improvemen tsto the park that are currently orwill beshared by multiple users. D. For improvement relatedprojects, the initiating organization will be responsible forall costs relating to the construction, operations, and mitigation of the project. 3/19/2013 r FORDPARK k MANAGEMENT PLAN SSUES A. ;;; P~~~~ 1, Mixed commen ts on this issue Remove allparking. - Build structure underfie/dsand /etVA pay forthem. Makethebusfrom theVTCtheeasiest way to get to the park. Improve the existing surface /oton/y, Build a structure underthe existing /otand use itfor emp/oyeeparking. 2. So/utions to the parking issue may involve more than one aspect. Reduce demandforparking by making it easier to use the bus, bymaking it easierto wa/k, andby coordinating schedu/esto eliminate overlapping events. Reconfigure existingparking areas, possibly expand existingparking areas somewhatto maximizethepotentiai numberof spaces. Remember thatFrontage Road improvements require approval fromCDOTand the lossof some parking spaces. 3. Theprimary issuebecomes thenumberof spaces tobe provided. VA has requested thatthe option of a day skierparking facility option beleft open. Public comment was mixed as to whether day skier parking was appropriate. Several thought VAshou/dpay foritifit isto bebuilt. Most agreed thatif a parking structure is to be builtit shou/d go underthe existinggravel lot 3/19/2013 FORD PARK MANAGEMENTPLAN ISSUES (CONT'D) 1. Mixed comments on thisissue as well. Don't build anything more ornewin the park. Earthcovered centerinthe park is ok. Putin soccerfie/d parking lotand bury it. Combine with Nature center oruse another existingfacility in the park. It is important thattheeducation center be adjacent or connected to the existing gardens. 2. Aframework fordecision making must be put into place #o dealwith this, as well as future develoment proposals. These run the range frvm a referendum required forall future buildings, structures or facilities, to restricted zoning, to TownCouncil decision making as being the appropriatemethod(s) to protect and preserve the park. 3/19/2013 r FORD PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN PRELIMINARY ACTION PLAN PROPOSED /MPROVEMENTS o Improve shuttlebus service. o Improve existing Streamwalk by: lighting landscaping grade improvement signage o Improve theother4 existing entries. o Design and construct new central access route into the park. Will require re-orientationof existing ballfie/ds. o Design and construct new waikway from parking structureto the parka/ong the Frontage Road. o Develop new signage program. o Design and construct centraltrash dumpster enclosure. o Improve accessofroadB to facilitate deliveries. o/mprove walkpath intoNature Center. o Improve existingp/ayground tomeetcurrent safety standards. o Design and construct Streamwa/k to Lionshead o lmprove vehicular accessfrom Frontage Road by consolidating entries and /andscaping. o Pave and landscape existing gravelparking /ot. 3/19/2013 ORDINANCENO. 19 Seriesof1996 AFV ORDINANCECORRECTING ORDINANCENO. 9, SERIESOF 1995, REZONING APARCEL OFPROPERTYLEGALLY DESCRIBEDASTRACT C, VAILVILLAGE SEVENTHFILING FROMGENERALUSEDISTRICT TOPRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, OrdinanceNo. 9, Seriesof1995, improperly referred tothe property located at 967Vail Valley Drive, Vail, Colorado, as being "TractC, VailVillage First Filing" ratherthan TractC, Vail Village Seventh Filing; and WHEREAS, areviewofResolutionNo. 5, Seriesof 1995, modifying theTownofVail LandUse Plan, theMinutesof May16, 1995, andtheMinutesofJune6, 1995, clearly show thatthe intention wasto rezone Tract C, Vail Village Seventh Filing; and WHEREAS, theTownofVail Zoning map properly reflectsTractC, Vail Village Seventh Filing as being presently zonedPrimary/Secondary Residential District; and NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT ORDAINEDBYTHETOWNCOUNCILOFTHETOWNOF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section1. That OrdinanceNo. 9, Series of 1995, incorrectly referredto "Tract C, Vail Village FirstFiling" ratherthanTract C, VailVillage Seventh Filing. Section 2. TheTownCouncilfinds thatthe procedures for a provision ofrezoning property intheTownof Vailhave beenfulfilted, andtheTown Council, in considering OrdinanceNo. 9, Seriesof1995, receivedthe report ofrecommendationfromthe Planning andEnvironmental Commission, recommending the rezoning ofTract C, Vail Village Seventh Filing. Section 3. PursuanttoSection 18.66.100 - 18.66.180 oftheVail MunicipalCode, the parcel of property legally described as Tract C, Vail Village Seventh Filing iszoned as Primary/Secondary ResidentialDistrict. Section 4. As provided intheTown ofVail, the zoning administratorishereby directedto modify and amendtheofficial zoning map toinclude the zoningspecified in Section3 above. 1 3/19/2013 Section 5. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase ofthisordinance isfor any reason heldto be invalid, suchdecisionshall not effect thevalidity ofthe remainingportions of this ordinance; andtheTownCouncil hereby declaresitwouldhave passed thisordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless ofthefactfhat any oneormore parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section6. TheTown Council herebyfinds, determinesanddeclares that this ordinanceis necessary and proper forthe health, safety andwelfare oftheTownofVailandtheinhabitantsthereof. Section 7. Theamendment of anyprovision ofthe VailMunicipal Code as provided inthis ordinanceshall notaffect any right whichhas accrued, any dutyimposed, any violation thatoccurred prior to the effectivedate hereof, anyprosecutioncommenced, nor any otheraction or proceeding as commencedunder or by virtueofthe provision amended. The amendmentof any provision hereby shall notrevive anyprovision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly statedherein. Section 8. All bylaws, orders, resolutionsand ordinances, or partsthereof, inconsistentherewith are repealed to theextent only ofsuch inconsistency. This repealer shallnotbe construedtorevise anybylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or partthereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ONFIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDEREDPUBLISHED ONCE INFULL, this15th day of October, 1996. A publichearing onthisordinance shallbe heldat the regular meeting oftheTownCouncil oftheTownof Vail, Colorado, onthe5th day of November, 1996, in the MunicipalBuilding oftheTown. Robert W. Armour, Mayor Al?EST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk 2 3/19/2013 INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED ANDENACTEDONSECOND READINGANDORDERED PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THISDAYOF 1996. RobertW. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk f: \everyone\orftrd19.96 3 3/19/2013 AFFIDAVIT OFDIRKMASON I, Dirk Mason, upon beingduly cautioned and swom, states as follows: 1.I am currentlyemployed as a Planner IfortheTown ofVailin the Department of CommunityDevelopment. 2.Ithasbeenbrought totheattention oftheTownof Vailthat OrdinanceNo. 9, Series of1995 incorrectly referredto the property locatedat 967Vail ValleyDrive, Vail, Colorado as being locatedinVail Village First Filing, when infactit islocatedin Vail Village Seventh Filing. (See attachedExhibit "A"). 3In Section2 ofOrdinance No. 9, Series of 1995, theordinance incorrectlyrefers tothe zoning as General UseDistrict, wheninfact the zoning has been changedto Primary/Secondary Residentiai District as properly statedin thetitleof OrdinanceNo. 9, Seriesof 1995. (See Exhibit "A"). 4.On March 7, 1995, before presenting theOrdinance to 9, Series of 1995,Resolution No. 5, Seriesof 1995modified theTown ofVailLandUse Plan, changingthe land use designation ofTract C, Vail Viltage Seventh Filing fromPark toLow Density Residential. (See attached Exhibit "6"). 5.In theMinutes oftheVail TownCouncil meeting ofMay 16, 1995, it reflectsthe first reading ofOrdinance No. 9, Series of1995, and whiletheMinutes incorrectly refer to theVail Village First Filing itdoesrefer to the property as967Vail Valley Drive, and theMinutes reflectthat Council was fully aware ofthelocation and natureof property that was being considered for rezoning to Primary/SecondaryResidenfiial Zone District. (See attachedExhibit "C"). 6.On June 6, 1995, Ordinance No. 9, Seriesof 1995 was considered on second reading andinthe Minutesofthe VailTown Council meeting the property in qDu, jstion is properly referred to as Vail Village Seventh Filing. (See attachedExhibit 7.The Town ofVail zoning maps properly reflect Tract C, Vail VillageSeventh Filing as being presently zoned Primary/Secondary ResidentialDistrict. 8.Scheduledfor firstand second reading is OrdinanceNo. 19, Series of 1996, correcting Ordinance No. 9, Series of1995. (See attached Exhibit "E"). 9.Exhibits A through E, inclusive, areas attachedhereto are trueand accurate copies ofthe original documents which are maintained inthe Townof Vail permanentrecords. 3/19/2013 Furtheraffiant sayethnaught, irkMas n STATE OFCOLORADO ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before meon this.~~ day of S~-, i=-„~~~" 1996, by Dirk Mason, asa Planner Iinthe Department of Community Development, Town of Vail, Stateof Colorado. Witness my hand andofficial seal. My commission expires:kmEW*,t, Notary Publc Ny Comrnissim Expires 617-1999 75S. Frontage Road Notajy Public 3/19/2013 L. • ORDINANCEN0. 9 Seriesof1995 ANORDINANCE REZONING APARCEL OFPROPERTY LEGALLYDESCRIBEDAS TRACT C, VAIL VILLAGEFIRST FILING FROMGENERAL USEDISTRICT T0PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND AMENDING THEOFFICIAL ZONINGMAPIN RELATION TOTHE REZONING OFSAID PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the property to be rezonedislocated withinthe municipal limitsof theTownof Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission hasconsideredthe appropriate rezoning for the property andhas unanimously recommended that theTownCouncil rezonethe parcel from GeneralUse Disttict toPrimary/Secondary Residential District; and WHEREAS, theTown Council considersitinthe public interest to rezonesaid property. NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT ORDAINED BYTHE TOWNCOUNCIL OFTHETOWN OFVAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TheTown Council findsthatthe procedures forthe provision of rezoning property intheTownof Vail haveben fulfilled, and theTown Council hereby received the report of recommendationfromthe Planning andEnvironmental Commission recommending the rezoning of said property. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 18.66.100 -18.66.180of theVail Municipal Code, the parcel of property legally described as TractC, Vail Village First Filing iszoned as GeneralUse District. Section 3. As provided inthe ordinancesof theTown ofVai{, the zoning administratoris hereby directed to modify and amend theofficial zoning map to include the zoning specified in Section 2above. Sec If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase ofthis ordinanceisfor any reason heldto be invalid, such decisionshall not effectthe validity of the remaining poraons of this ordinance;; andthe Town Council hereby declares it wouldhave passed this ordinance, andeach nart. section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrasethereof, regardless ofthe factthat any one ormoreparts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declaredinvalid. Exhibit "A" 3/19/2013 gC1p115, TheTown Council herebyfinds, determinesanddeclares thatthisordinanceis necessary and proper for the health, safety andwelfareof theTown ofVailandthe inhabitants thereof. Sec The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision ofthe Vail Municipal Code as provided inthis, ordinanceshall not affect anyright which hasaccrued, anydutyimposed, any violafion that occurred prior tothe effectivedate hereof, any prosecutioncommenced, nor any otheraction or proceeding as commencedunder or by virtue ofthe provisionrepealed or repealed andreenacted. The repeal of any provisionhereby shall notrevive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly statedherein. Sect~ All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extentonly ofsuch inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READON FIRST READING, APPROVED ANDORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this16th day of May,1995. A public hearing shall beheld hereon on the6th day ofJune, 1995, at the regular meeting of theTownCouncil oftheTown ofVail, Colorado, inthe Municipal Building oftheTown. a_ Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST:Nu~?OF EAL 0~3~f1 pr~ , DYPv r0 n C/P/`~~ qOL~O AEADAND APPROVED ONSECOND READING ANDORDERED PUBLISHEDby Hle- m this day ofm-ne1995. Margaret A. sterfoss, Mayor AITEST: eo O1. r Sl4 EDApL wn Clerk uu0L0~~~ 3/19/2013 RESOLUTION N0. 5 Seriesof1995 ARESOLUTION MODIFYINGTHETOWN OFVAIL LANDUSE PLAN, CHANGINGTHELANDUSEDESIGNATION OFTRACT C, VAILVILLAGE7THFILINGFROM PARKTO LOWDENSITY RESIDENTIAL, ANDSETTINGFORTH DETAILSINREGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, conditionsintheTown ofVaiihave changed sincetheLand UsePlan was originally adopted; and WHEREAS, the proposed LandUsePlanmodification would serve to carry out the following poficies oftheLand UsePlan: 1.1Vail should continueto grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercialand recreational uses to serveboth thevisitorand the permanent resident. 1.3The quality of development should bemaintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vailshould accommodate mostof theadditional growth in existingdeveloped areas in-fill areas). 5.1Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in newareas where high hazardsdo not exist. 6.1 Services should keep pace with increased growth. 6.2The Townof Vailshould play a role in future developmentthrough balancing future growth with services. 6.3 Services shouldbe adjusted tokeep pace with theneedsof peak periods; and WHEREAS, theTown of Vail has a needforadditional landwiththe designation of Low Density Residential inorder to meet the standards oftheabove-listed policy statements. NOW, THEREFORE, BEITRESOLVED BYTHE TOWNCOUNCIL OFTHE TOWNOF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: 1.The TownCouncil finds the procedures foramending theLand UsePian, as set forth in ChapterVIII, Section 3oftheLand UsePlan havebeen satisfied. 2.The Town Council hereby amendstheLand UsePlan tochange theLand Use DP.cjnnatinn chnyvn nn FiniirA 14_M f1lAiri_Cprtinn 11Aan1nf thA nlflnfrnm po-rl, i~ L~y„ri r....... . _ Residential for the property moreparticularly described as TractC, Vail Village 7th Filing. 3.The properryownedapplicant, or his successorin interest, agrees withthe following requirements, which are apart ofthis modificabon to theLandUse Plan. Exhibit "B" 1 3/19/2013 A.Prior to the transferof ownership ofthe property, theVail VaileyConsolidated Water Districtwilldedicate an approximate 10-footwide public easement acrossthe eastern sideofTractC to theTownofVail, to allow forthe continued use of a, portion of TractCfor a golf cartpath. B.Prior tothe transferof ownership ofthe property, theVailVailey Consolidated Water Districtwill dedicate a road easement across the western portion of TractC to theTownofVail (approximately 60 feetfromthe westernmostend of the property) to beusedfor thefuture realignment ofVail Valley Drive (to connect withtheSouth Frontage Road). C.Atthe time oftransferof ownership ofthe property, theVail Valley Consolidated Water Districtandtheir grantee will enter into an agreement withtheTown ofVail to removeallabove andbelow groundimprovements on Tract C, withthe exception ofthe eastem 15feetofthe8-inch ironintake pipe, the10-inch iron pipe usedto backwashthe pump station andintake pipes, andthe sewer manholelocated along Vail Valley Drive. The agreement wiNbein terms that are acceptable to theTown ofVailand guarantee that suchremovalof improvements willbeconcluded withinthree years. The hole(s) resulting from theremovalofbelow groundimprovements willbefilled andthe property willbe regraded and revegetated according to a plan approved by theTown. D.The VailValley Consolidated Water Districthas agreed thatifthe transferof ownership ofthe raw water intake system and associated equipment (purnp station, backwash pipe, vaults, etc.) to theVailRecreation District hasnot been completed, al].d if the system isnotable to becomefully operational within three years fromthedate ofapproval ofthis LandUsePlan change, the raw waterintake system and associated equipment will immediately be removed at the expense oftheWater District. E.Prior totransferof ownership ofthe property theVail Valley Consolidated WatarDistrlc-t will prgcAnt a landcra~„r,c_ p!an fQrtho rn,I,'rnp Errt;C^ %l2:lftSw^A a plan forthe visual screening ofthe pipes locatedinGoreCreek to the Design Review Boardfortheir reviewand approval. All improvements authorized by the Design ReviewBoard willbeinstalled by theWaterDistrict no laterthan June30, 1995. 2 3/19/2013 INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVEDAND ADOPTEDthis 7''''day of M41dk1995. c~ C~ _ Margaret A. Osterfoss, May A) HotlyMcCutcheon, TownClerk f :leveryonebrMresS.JC 3 3/19/2013 MINUTES VAIL TOWNCOUNCIL MEE'TIlNG May 16, 1995 7:30P.M. A regularmeeting oftheVail TownCouncil was held on Tuesday, May 16, 1995, inthe Council Chambers ofthe Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 6:30P.M. MEMBERSPhESENT:Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Tom Steinberg Paul johnston Jan Strauch jun Shearer TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Assistant TownManager Anne Wright on behalfofthe TownClerk MEMBERS ABSINT:Sybill Navas The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation, there was none. At #histime Paul Johnston made a motion directing staff to prepare a supplementalappropriation of up to $ 25,000 for the Gypsum/Vail Express. Jim Shearer secondedthemotion. A vote was takenand passed unanimously, 6-0. The second item on the agenda Ordinance No. 9, Seriesof 1995, first reading of anordinance rezoning Tract C, Vail Village First Filing/967 Vail Valley Drive fromtheGeneral UseZone District to the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District. Applicant: Pat Dauphinais. JimCurnutte presented this Ordinance andnoted that on February 27, 1995, the WaterDistrict received Planning andEnvironmental Commission (PEC) reviewand approvalof their request tochange the Vail LandUsePlan designation ofthis property from parkto Low Density Residential. On March 7, 1995, theVail Town Council approvedResolution No. 5, Seriesof 1995which authorized the change to the VailLand UsePlanfrom Park toLowDensity Residential. ResolutionNo. 5containedfive conditions which must beaddressed by the applicant prior to thetransfer of ownership of the property.On April 10, 1995the PEC unanimously approve theWater District's request to rezoneTract Cfrom theGeneral use district tothePrimary/Secondary Residential Zone Districtsee attachedstaff inemorandum to thePEC anddraft copy ofthemeeting minutesfromthe April 10, 1995PEC meeting.) Mayor Osterfoss read Ordinance No. 9, Seriesof 1995in full. jan Strauch made a motionto approve Ordinance No. 9, with a secondby Paul Johnston. A vote was talcenandpassed, 5-1. Merv Lapin was opposed. The thirditem onthe agenda Presentations by thethreefinalists of proposals for theVail Commons development. 1. Lofius Development 2. City Market 3. The Gart Companies In conjunction with theTask Force and public, interview each development team afterthey have madetheir presentations. Fifteenminutes isallocated for each presentation,with the following 30 minutes reservedfor questions. Since short-listing these three firms, eachhas received questions and comments abouttheir original proposal. Theproposals were reviewed earlier by theCouncil, Task Force,and community members on March 20, 1995 at the open house and on Apri14,1995 at 1 Vail TownCoune2 EvemnB1[eetin6 lliadm6/16196 Exhibit "C" 3/19/2013 a publichearing. Staff understandsthat the proposals presentedtonight havebeen modified in response to theTown's comments. Affordable Housing Development Corporationdropped out. Merv Lapin stated a conflict ofinterest inthis project and stepped downfrom the Council table atthistime. 1.Presenters forLoftus Development were Randy McNichols, Co-Developer with JimLoftus; Mike Mulhern, Architect; John B. Young, affordable housingconsultant. 2•Presenters for City Market were John L. Caldwell, Director ofRealEstateforCityMarket; Mark Donaldson, Architect; and Robert Warner, Warner Development. 3.Presentersfor The Gart Companies were Steve Elkin, TomGart; Mark Humphreys, Architect. Presentations were made and questions askedfrom Counciland the public. The fourth item on the agenda TownCouncil appeal of a PECdecision to approve a Conditional Use Permitthat allows a Type II Employee Housing Unit to be 'located at126Forest Road/LotS, Block 7, Vail Village lstFiling. Applicant Ron Byrne. Susan Connelly presented this appeal andnoted that on May8,1995, the PEC approvedwith a condition (5-0-1, Greg Moffett abstained) a conditional use permit allowing a Type II employee housing unit to be located at 126Forest Road. Please see the memo to the PECfor additional background andthe condition of approval. Jay Peterson was present on behalfof the applicant, Ron Byrne. Paul johnston made a motion touphold the PECdecision to approve a conditional use permit, with a second by Jim Shearer. A vote was takenand failed, 2-3. Merv Lapin,Tom Steinberg and Jan Strauch beingopposed. A motion was then made by Jan Strauch touphold thePEC approval withthe additionof a condition that inaddiiion tothe restrictionsincluded inthe Type II EH[Tdeedrestriction, the applicant agrees to future restrictions thatthe Townwill adopt thatpertain to deed restricted employee housing. Tom Steinberg secondedthe motion. Avote was taken and passed, 4-1. Paul johnston being opposed. Thefifth item on the agenda wasa TownCouncil call-up of Design Review Boardapproval of Aipine Bank tenant finish at Crossroads Mall, eastbuilding (old VerbatimBookstore location). Atthis time Merv Lapin stated a conflictof interest stepped downfrom theCounciltable. Susan Connelly presented this call-up and notedthat on May 3,1995theDRB approveda tenantfinish and modification to the storefront exteriorand arcade roof supportcolumns. Since the Crossroads owners and tenants are inthe process of upgradingexterior facades atthe mall, the Council is requesting attention to several othermaintenance items. JayPeterson letCouncil know thatAlpine Bank was indeed the applicant forthisproject.John Young was present representingAlpine Bank. Jan Strauch made a motion to uphold theDRB approval oftheAlpine Bank tenant finishat Crossroads Mall, with a second by Jim Shearer. A vote was takenand passedunanimously, 5-0, with one abstention, Merv Lapin. 2 vailTo.n, couna EvewgMed;,,s Yia„ta. s1sl96 3/19/2013 The sixthitem onthe agenda was theTown Managefs Report. Noadditional presentation was made. There being nofurther business, Jim Shearer moved toadjourn at approximately 10:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ATTEST: Margaret A.Osterfoss, Mayor PamelaA. Brandmeyer, Deputy TownClerk Minutestaken by Mne Wright on behalf oftheTownClerk. Narnes ofoertanin3vidualswho gave puWicnput may be vwmrrate.) 3 vaiirw.n coum7EvwmW MadW Wnute. snslBs 3/19/2013 MINUTES VAILTOWN COUNCIL MEETING June 6, 1995 7:30P.M. A regular meeting oftheVail Town Council was held on Tuesday, June 6, 1995, intheCouncil Chambers ofthe Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called toorder at7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT:Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Tom Steinberg Sybill Navas JanStrauch Jim Shearer MEMBERS ABSENT:Paul Johnston TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney PamelaA. Brandmeyer, Asst. Town Manager Lori Aker, Deputy TownClerk The firstitem on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Lou Meskimen expressed concern about the potential displacement of beavers atBighorn Park. The beavers, if displaced, will pose the same or greater problem atanother location. He suggested feeding thebeavers withfallen or cut trees to helpsupplement their diet. He asked theTown to join himin keeping an eye on thesituation. Rick Sackbauer, chairman ofthe Upper Eagle Valley Water District, readfrom a pressrelease eorrecting a Denver news report which cited problems withVail's water. Hesaid the problems were actually occurring in theLake Creek Water District, 20mileswest of Vail. The Denver television station rana retractionto correct the error andoffered its apologies. Bill Kerig, Kent Rose, andPaul Gotthelf ofthe EagleValley Cycling Coalition presentedthe Council with a$1,000 check tobe earmarked for completion of theDowd Junctionbike path. The coalition is dedicated to seeking a complete bike system throughout theVail valley. Mayor PeggyOsterfoss thanked the group fortheir donation tothe TownofVail. The second item on the agenda was the Mauri Nottingham Environmental QualityAwards Ceremony. This award was createdto recognize outstanding environmentalachievements andactions. There are three categories forthe award: individual,business, and student. The three award winners are as follows: The Antlers ofVailBusiness) fortheir fireplace conversion; Bill andJean Johnson (Individual) for beingthe first to place land intothe Eagle County Land Conservancy for perpetuity; andtheEagle Valley High School Bio-Building (Student); which is a building specificallydedicated to hydroponics and aquaculture. Honorable mentions were also presented toMike King for starting arecycling program attheBattle Mountain HighSchool and toKerry Donovan at student atBattle Mountain HighSchool forher river watch efforts. Thethird item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda:A.Approval of theMinutes for the meetings of May 2and 16, 1995. B.Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance rezoning Tract 1 VailTown CouncilEvening Meeting Minutes616V95 Exhibit "D" 3/19/2013 C, Vail Village First Filing/967 Vail Valley Drivefrom theGeneral Use Zone District to the Primary/Secondary Residential ZoneDistrict. Mayor Osterfoss readthe Consent Agenda in full. Merv Lapin movedto approve theConsent Agenda with a second bySteinberg. Lapin then amendedhis motion to approve theMinutes only (with corrections being madeto the May16, minutes "four" changed to " three" on theVail Commons Developers item andthe vote on item five correctedto statethat Lapin abstained from voting) andthat discussion on OrdinanceNo. 9 beheld separately. Steinberg secondedthis amendedmotion. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 6-0. OrdinanceNo. 9, Series of 1995. Jim Curnutte presented this item to theCouncil andhanded out amemorandumfrom April 10, 1995, tothe Planning andEnvironmentalCommission explaining the request to rezone Tract C, Vail Village 7th Filing from theGeneral UseZone District the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District. Ann Repetti, Ratph Davis andJim Lamont offered commentsin opposition tothis ordinance.Jan Strauch moved to approve Ordinance No. 9, Seriesof 1995 on second reading,second bySteinberg. The motion passed5-1, with Merv Lapin opposing. Thefourth item on the agenda was first reading ofOrdinance No. 10, Seriesof 1995,Vail Recreation District (VRD) request tochange the zoning fromthe Natural Area Preservation District to the GeneralUse Districtfor theVailGolf Course Maintenance Facility located at1278 VailValley Drive, Parcel EVail Valley 7th Filing. On April 4, theTownCouncil unanimously approvedchanging the VailLandUse Plan designation forthis property from "Open Space" to "PublicSemi Public." This zone change request isthe second step in a three-step process thatcoutd enablethe District to apply for a conditional use permit toremodel the facility. This maintenance facility is currently a legal non conforming use onproperty thatiszoned NaturalArea Preservation (NAP).The useofthesite is non consistent with the zoning (theonly permitted use in NAPis nature preserve) andhasexisted on the sitesince 1966. The siteis usedfor storage offuel; equipment, and various supplies used tomaintainthe golf course. Ifthis amendment to theLand UsePlan is approved, theTown willconsider rezoning these properties, along with others, to further protect openspace and address conflicts between zoning and actualland use. On May 8, 1995, the Planning andEnvironmental Commission unanimously recommendedthe TownCouncil approve this zoning change.Russell Forrest presented thisordinance. Merv Lapin moved to approve OrdinanceNo. 10, Series of 1995, on first reading, with a secondby Tom Steinberg. A vote wastaken andthe motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Thefifth item on the agenda was second reading ofOrdinance No. 5, Series of1995,an Animal Control and Carriage Operations Ordinance. Tom Moorhead andBob Slaglepresented thisordinance. This comprehensive animalcontrol ordinance addresses carriage operations in addition to otheranimal issues. Tom Moorhead indicated the definitionfor "Training" hadbeen revised to mean the education, instruction, or discipline of a dog that is being trained. Healsoindicated a typo which wouldbe corrected. Citizen comments were received from Randy Guierro. Merv Lapin moved to approveOrdinance No. 5, Seriesof 1995, on second reading including the changespresented by Tom Moorhead, with a second by Jan Strauch. A vote was taken andthemotion passed, 5-1, withTom Steinberg opposing. The sixthitem on the agenda was Resolution No. 13, Series of 1995, a request to change theVail LandUse Planfor 13 parcels of property throughout theTown ofVailfrom their current Land UsePlan designations to theOpen Space and Public/Semi-Public designations. Russell Forrest andJimCurnutte presented this Resolution. TheCommunity Development Department is proposing to change theVail Land UsePlandesignations of 13 propertiesthroughout theTown ofVail. The reason for proposingthe changes is to address inconsistencies between the actual use ofthese parcels andtheir current designation on theLand UsePlan map. On May 8, 1995, the Planningand Environmental Commission unanimously recommended approval ofthis amendment totheVail LandUse Plan. Citizen input was receivedfrom the following: 2 Vai/ Town Counci! Evening Meeling Minutes616195 3/19/2013 Hermann Staufer, Peter Furstenberg, DouglasHawkins, BillWilto, John Milliganrepresenting the Mays family) andJim Lamont, all in support. Merv Lapin moved to approveResolution No. 13, Series of 1995, withthe revisionof adding to the propertylist "Lot 10, Bighorn Subdivision", with a secondby Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken andthe motion passedunanimously, 6-0. The seventhiterri on the agenda wasan Audit Report Presentation. Jerry McMahanof McMahan & Associates, PC, together withSteve Thompson andChristine Anderson presentedthe audit report. McMahan indicated theaudit was very "clean." Merv Lapindisclosed .that Jerry McMahanis his personal CPAfor VailSecurities. Lapin praisedMcMahan's work fortheTown ofVail. However Lapin felt theTownofVail should change who they hire to perForm theaudit every three or more years. Bob McLaurin stated theTown ofVailis currently in thefirst year of a three year contractwith McMahan, and attheendof thisterm theTown will go outto bid again for another. CPA. Merv Lapin movedto approve the 1994Town ofVail Audit, with a second byTom Steinberg. Avote was taken andthe motion passed unanimously, 6-0. The eighth item on the agenda was theTown Council appeal of a PECdecision to approve a Conditional UsePermit toallow forthe installation of an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) tobelocated atthe OneVail Place Building, 244Wall Street, a part ofBlock 5C, Vail Village First Filing. JimCurnutte presented this item. On May22, thePEC approved with two conditions a Conditional UsePermit to allowfor theinstallationof an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM). Joe Miller, Assistant VicePresident ofFirstBank andJack Curtin, owner ofOne Vail Place, gave their commentsto the Council.Lapin disclosed he was in negotiations withFirst Bank, but felthe was still eligible tovote on thisitem. Tom Steinberg moved touphold the PECdecision allowing an ATMmachine at 224Wall Street, with a secondby Jim Shearer. Avote was taken andthemotion passed unanimously, 6-0. The ninth item on the agenda was to Appoint threeLocal Licensing AuthorityMembers from thebelow list: Mary C. Zarba EllenSchmitt Joseph Palaszynski BenIrvin Davey Wilson Linda Fried Jeffrey S. Auxier Merv Lapin movedto appoint Mary C. Zarba, Ellen Schmitt, and Davey Wilson to theLocal Licensing Authority each forfinro year terms expiring inJune 1997. This wasseconded by Tom Steinberg. A vote was takenand themotion passed unanimously, 6-0. The tenth item on the agenda was theTown Manager's Report. $ob McLauren statedhe wouldbe outof TownJune 10-20, 1995. There being no further business, Merv Lapin moved to adjoum at approximately 10:00P.M. Respectfully submitted, 44 a~a,mn:i„;.,...,N Gf Margaret A. Osterfoss, MayorATTEST: z Lori Aker, D "LOe~ Namesof certefnindividuab whly(~iYlwpp~lld~p~t ~y peinacwrate,) 3 VailTown CouncilEvening Meeting Minutes 616)95 3/19/2013 f ORDINANCE NO. 19 Seriesof1996 AN ORDINANCE CORRECTINGORDINANCE NO. 9, SERIESOF 1995, REZONING APARCEL OFPROPERTY LEGALLYDESCRIBED ASTRACT C, VAIL VILLAGE SEVENTH FILINGFROM GENERALUSEDISTRICTTO PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9, Seriesof 1995, improperly referredtothe property locatedat967Vail ValleyDrive, Vail, Colorado, as being "Tract C, Vail Village First Filing" rather thanTract C, Vail Village Seventh Filing; and WHEREAS, a reviewofResolution No. 5, Seriesof 1995, modifying theTownofVail LandUse Plan, theMinutesof May 16, 1995, andtheMinutes ofJune6, 1995, clearly show thattheintention wasto rezoneTract C, VailVillage Seventh Filing; and WHEREAS, theTown ofVail Zoning map properly reflectsTractC, Vail Village Seventh Filing as beingpresently zoned Primary/Secondary Residential District; and NOW, THEREFORE, BEITORDAINEDBYTHETOWN COUNCILOFTHETOWNOF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. ThatOrdinanceNo. 9, Seriesof 1995, incorrectly referredto " TractC, Vail Village First Filing" ratherthan TractC, Vail Village Seventh Filing. Section2. TheTown Councilfindsthatthe procedures for a provision of rezoning property intheTownof Vailhavebeen fulfilled, andtheTown Council, inconsidering OrdinanceNo. 9, Series of1995, received the report of recommendationfromthe Planning and EnvironmentalCommission, recommending the rezoning ofTract C, VailVillage Seventh Filing. Section 3. Pursuant to Section 18.66.100 - 18.66.180 oftheVailMunicipal Code, theparcel of property legally described as Tract C, Vail Village Seventh Filing iszoned as Primary/Secondary Residential District. Section4. As provided intheTownof Vail, the zoning administrator is hereby directedto modify and amendtheofficial zoning map toinclude thezoningspecified inSection 3above. Section5. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of thisordinanceisfor any reason held to beinvalid, such decisionshall noteffect thevalidity ofthe remainingportions ofthis Exhibit "E" 3/19/2013 ordinance; and theTownCouncil hereby declaresitwouldhave passed thisordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of thefactthat any oneormore parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases bedeclared invalid. Section6. TheTownCouncil hereby finds, determines anddeclaresthatthisordinanceis necessary and proper for thehealth, safety and welfareoftheTownofVail andtheinhabitantsthereof. Section 7. The amendmentof any provision of theVailMunicipal Code as provided inthisordinanceshall not affect anyright whichhas accrued, any dutyimposed; any violationthatoccurred prior to theeffective datehereof, anyprosecution commenced, norany other action or proceeding as commencedunder or by virtue ofthe provision amended. Theamendmentof any provision hereby shall not revive anyprovision or any ordinance previouslyrepealed or superseded unless expressly statedherein. Section8. All bylaws, orders, resolutions andordinances, or partsthereof, inconsistentherewith are repealed to the extentonly ofsuch inconsistency. This repealer shall notbeconstruedtorevise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or partthereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READONFIRST READING, APPROVED, ANDORDEREDPUBLISHED ONCEIN FULL, this15th day ofOctober, 1996. Apublic hearing on this ordinanceshallbe held atthe regularmeeting oftheTown Councilofthe Town ofVail, Colorado, on the 5th day of November, 1996, inthe MunicipalBuilding ofthe Town. Robert W. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: HollyMcCutcheon, TownClerk 3/19/2013 INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED ANDENACTEDONSECOND READINGANDORDERED PUBLISHED (INFULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THISDAYOF 11996. RobertW. Armour, Mayor ATTEST: HollyMcCutcheon, TownClerk Meveryone\ordRord19.96 3/19/2013 u y TOWNOFYAIL 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX970-479-2157 MEDIA ADVISORY October 9, 1996 Contact:Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community InformationOffice VAILTOWN COUNCILHIGHLIGHTSFOROCTOBER 8 Work SessionBriefs Council members present: Armour, Foley, Ford, Jewett, Johnston, Kurz, Navas Tour oftheVailCommons Site During a walking tour oftheVailCommons development, Councilmembers visited one ofthe 53 housing units on thesite, among otherelements. A handfu( oftheiocals housing unitswillbe ready for occupancy within thenexttwo weeks, whilethe City Market grocery store component ofthedevelopment will open inmid-to-late February. Several Council membersinquired aboutthe statusof finding a day care provider to operate on thesite (ads are currentlybeing run byCity Marketinlocal newspapers to solicit proposals). In addition, CouncilmanPaul Johnstonstressedtheneed toprovide infant careat thefacility. JohnCaldwell ofCity Marketsaidfeedbackfrom providers, thus far, hasn'tbeen positive about providing infant care, due tothe profit margin. He saidhe'll sharethe day care proposals withthe town oncethedeadlinefor proposals has passed. SiteVisit to WallStreetFire Scene During a walk-through ofthe fire-ravaged WallStreet Building withmembersoftheFire Department, Council members saw wherethefire originated and inspected the building's damage. Thefire causedstructural damage tothe secondandthirdfloors. In addition, retailers onthefirstfloorlost100% oftheirstock. FireChief DickDuran saidthe Sept. 27 fire (alarm was at7:27 a.m.) occurred during a shift change of crew members, whichallowedtwice thenumberof firefighters torespond tothe scene. Fire MarshalMikeMcGee saidthe building burnedthree timesfaster thanusualbecauseof the presence of plastic skiboots andflammableliquid nearwherethefire began. He saidthe incident serves asa reminderofthe importance in knowing the types of materialsthat are storedineachofthe buildings. After expressing their appreciation to thoseinvolvedin extinguishing and investigating thefire, Councilmembersturnedtheir attention toreconstruction scenarios, pedestrian accesson WallStreetand staging operations. There are15 different owners involved withthebuilding, firefighters said. more) 5~ RECYCLEDPAPER 3/19/2013 Add 1lTOV Council Highlights Information Update PublicWorks DirectorLarry Grafel presented an update on theVail Village Club Serrano's). Hesaid theconstruction project is currently onschedule. The contractor is approved towork onthe project from7 a.m. to7 p.m. MondaythroughSaturday and from8 a.m. to5:30 p.m. on Sundays. Councilmembers are keeping aclosewatch on the constructiontominimize impactsduring ski season. Grafel alsoindicated acallfor artistshas beenpreparedby theArtsInPublicPlaces Boardforthe SeibertCircle project. The proposals willbe sentoutnext week, with responses due January 6. Selectionwill occuron January 21with construction beginning in the spring of1998 andcompletedJuly 4, 1998. Thetownhassetaside 300,000 forthe project. Jim LamontoftheEast Village HomeownersAssociationsaid his group fully supported moving aheadwiththe solicitation, but suggestedrefining the finai design toaccommodate emergency response vehiclesandloading and delivery interests through the area. Inaddition, Mike Rose, transit manager, andTodd Scholl, fleet manager, are attending theAmerican Public Transportation annual meeting, Grafelsaid. Oneofthe town's new40-ft. busesis on display atthe meeting. Also, the EagleCountyRegional Transportation Authority has agreed tolease an over-the-roadcoachto useonthe system during ski season. Grafel alsoannouncedthat 10membersfromthe Wyoming Department of Transportation areinVail thisweek tolearn moreabout theMainVaiiroundabouts. Lastly, it was announcedVail Valley MedicalCenterhasauthorized an appropriation of 8,000 to upgrade the helipadjust west oftheVail MunicipalBuildingalong South Frontage Road. Work willbegin Oct. 14andwill becompleted withintwoweeks. During theconstruction period, the helipad locationwill bemoved temporarily to the east endofFord Parkinthe parking lot. SPECIAL NOTE: Asof2:30P.M. today, Tawn staffhas just learned the access permit toallow thisupgrade mustbe approvedby a special commission meeting for CDOT tobeheld Thursday, October 17th. Assuming approval, the project willbegin thefollowing day. AssistantTown Manager Pam Brandmeyer said representatives fromtheWorldWide ChurchofGod had expressed theirthanksfor a great conventioninVail. She said construction atthe entranceofDobsonArenaand the Vail Library did not appear to negativelyimpact the group's convention activities. Discuss Changing theDatefor theRegular Municipal Election TheCouncil voted 7-0tocreate an ordinance to authorize aballotissueforthe next municipal election toallow votersto determineif they wish to amendthe VailCharterto more) 3/19/2013 t Add 2lTOVCouncil Highlights align the dateofVail's municipal election withelection datesforthe county and state. Currently, the county and state elections areheldthe firstTuesday afterthe first Monday inNovember. However, Vail's municipal electionisheldthefirst Tuesday after the third Monday (in odd years). Mayor Bob Armour, who suggested considerationof the change, notedtheconfusion and costs associatedwith thecurrent election schedule. Whilethe original intent was well-founded in giving consideration tothose who may havebeen outof town beforethestartofski season, Armour said, the community--and technology--havechanged to the point thatthe extratwoweeks might notbe as much afactor these days. Council members agreed thematter doesn't warrant a special election. The question will beaddedto the nextscheduled municipal electioninNovember 1997, unless other issues necessitate a special election prior to next fall. More Information Update TheCouncil authorized public distributionof expanded council meetingagendas which providebackground rationale, staff recommendationsand an estimated length oftime fordiscussion ofeachitem. Council membersasked the disclaimer indicating the approximation oftimes (on the agenda are subject tochange), be prominentlyposted, so membersofthe public willknow to usethetimetable asa guide, not asan absolute schedulefor timing appearances beforethe Council. Council Reports SybillNavas, theCouncil's representative on theSpecial EventsCommission, suggestedformalizing the entityby creating termsand membership forthe Commission, muchlikethe Arts InPublicPlacesBoard. Councilmembers expressed interest in discussing a proposal. Paul Johnston, theCouncil's representative on the EagleCounty Recreation Authority Berry Creek5th), gave an update on thelast meeting and expressed frustrationin advancing Vail's housing interests with the remainingpartners. TheTownofVailholds 60 percent ownership ofthe property. Wondering how practical itis forthetownto continue tohang on toits ownership percentage, RodFord suggested thetown take a proactive rolein determining howit might sellits ownership interesttoanother entity. Hesaid theTownofVail was instrumentalin protecting the property from development whentheland was purchased. He said nowit'stimeforother parties totake responsibility for the property andtobring the money back toVail. TownAttorney Tom Moorhead was asked toresearchthe town'soptions. Paul Johnstonalso toldof a company that usesanew technology of light-weight concrete systems infabricationof buildings and was Iooking toestablish a presence in theU.S., perhaps inVail. He wondered ifthe technology couldbe explored for a locals housing development. more) 3/19/2013 f Add3/TOVCouncil Highlights Bob Armour reported he metwith representatives from the NationalAssociationof BrotherhoodSkiers inpreparation foritsVail meeting in February andMarch. Armour also attended a 1999World Alpine Ski Championshiporganizing committeemeeting. UPCOMING DISCUSSIONTOPICS October 15Work Session PECReview JointPresentation by Vail Village and LionsheadMerchantsAssociations FordParkOverview October 15 EveningMeeting Reviewof FordPark Conceptual MasterPlan OrdinanceNo. 19, First Reading, Ordinance to Rezone a ParcelofPropertyLegally Described as TractC, Vail Village Seventh Filing fromGenera{ Use District to Primary/Secondary Residential District October 22WorkSession DRB Review November 5WQrkSession (at LibraryCommunityRoom) PEC/DRB Review Ordinance No. 18, SDD #5AmendmentDiscussion Loading & Delivery inCore 1997 Budget Lionshead Redevelopment Overview November5 Evening Meeting First Reading, Ordinance # 18, SDD #5Amendment Second Reading, Ordinance #19, Rezone Property fromGeneral Use District to Primary/Secondary Residential District Lionshead Redevelopment Update 3/19/2013 Eagle Valleyirir Habitat for Humanity invites you to join inthecelebration of XC~ DuAta ourfirst G bA. Q Tultul1910Du'n AnON October 19,1996 10:00 am At thenewlycompleted Lopez Home 503 2ndSt., Gypsum) Pan Please RSVPat827~-40o9~ng 1•~•~ 3/19/2013 TOWNOFVAIL 75 Souih Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2100 FAX 970-479-2157 FORIMMEDIATERELEASE October 11, 1996 Contact:RobFord, 479-1860Bob Armour, 479-1860 Vai! TownCouncilmanVail Mayor VAILTOWNCOUNCILEXTENDSCOMMUNITYOUTREACH WITHTWICE-A-MONTHDAILYGRINDAPPEARANCES Vail)--On thefirstandthird Tuesday ofeach month, a representative from theVail Town Council willbe onhandfrom8 to9 a.m. attheDaily Grind on Bridge Street inVail Village tohearwhat you thinkabout town-related matters. The new outreach program, which begins next Tuesday (10-15), istheideaof CouncilmanRobFord. "Weall wanttokeep in touchwithmembers ofthe community andthis is onesmall thing wecandotoreachout," Fordsaid. We'veallbeen doing this onourownto some extent, but nowitmakes somesensetocommit tohaving a regular presence onthe morning of our evening Council meetings." That way, if someone has a question about an agenda item to bediscussedlater inthe day, the issues can beaddressed, Fordsaid. The Council's outreachthis year hasalsoincluded a24-hourvoice-mailphone number, 479-1860, inwhich messages canbeleft any timeofday, and a commitment to involving citizensinthetown's decision-making, such astheWestVail Interchange project. Mayor BobArmour applauded Ford'sinitiative. "We really wanttoknowhow people feelabout issues," Armoursaid. "Andthisis one way we candothat." RECYCLEDPAPER 3/19/2013 CML RECEIvEO9cr 7 1996 1660LincolnStreet, Suite 2100 • Denver, Colorado80264-2101 • Phone (303) 831-6411, FAX (303) 860-8175 TO: (1) Mayors; (2) Managers (or ClerksinMunicipalities without Managers); (3) Municipal Attorneys; (4) CMLExecutive Board; (5) CML Municipal CaucusMembers; (6) Membersof CML'sBallot IssuesCommittee; (7) COG Directors; (8) DOLAField Reps FROM: KenBueche, ExecutiveDirector SUBJECT: NovemberStatewideBallotIssues AffectingMunicipalities DATE: October 2, 1996 Introduction OnNovember5, voterswill casttheirballots onfourreferredand eight initiatedstatewideissues. The Colorado MunicipalLeague ExecutiveBoardandBallotIssues Committeehavetakenpositions onfive ofthese measures thatparticularlyimpactmunicipal governments. CML's greatest concemiswith Amendment13, the so-called "PetitionRights" Amendment. Thisamendmentisalsosometimesreferred to as "Sonof 12," becauseitis patterned afterAmendment 12, which was rejected by voters in1994. ThestatewideballotissuesandCML's positions are printed below: TOPIC CMLPOSITION Refereudum Arequiring constitutional amendmentstobeapprovedby at Support least60% ofthosevoting ontheissue (ConstitutionalAmendments) Referendum Bmodifying time period for mailing information tovoters on Noposition ballotissues (Ballot Information Mailing TimePeriods) Referendum Cauthorizing the GeneralAssembly toestablish qualifications No position for county sheriffs (County Sheriff Qualifications) ReferendumDexemptingunemploymentcompensation fundsfrom No position TABORlimits (LTnemploymentCompensationExemption fromTABOR) Amendment 11 repealing property tax exemption forvarious non-profit Oppose entities (Changes in Property TaxExemption) Amendment12 providing forenforcement ofterm limits applicable tofed-Noposition eral electedofficials (TermLimits) Amendment13liberalizing initiativeandreferenda rightsapplicable to the Oppose stateandlocal governments (Petitions orSon of12) Amendment14prohibiting variousmethodsof taking wildlife (Prohibited Noposition Methodsof TakingWildlife) Amendment15 imposingcampaign financelimitations oncandidatesfor No position stateoffices (CampaignReform) Amendment16facilitatingpreservation ofthestate's public trust land Support State Land Board) Amendment17establishing inalienableparentalrights (ParentalRights)Oppose Amendment18 authorizing limitedgaming inTrinidad (TrinidadGaming)Noposition 3/19/2013 EnclosedInformation do. Electedofficialshaveboth a legal right and a Enclosedis a sample resolution opposing politicalresponsibility to speak out onballot Amendment 13that you canuseasa guide if your issues. municipality desires to pass a resolution. Also Fund Raising enclosedis abrochurepublishedby Balance Municipalfunds, of course, cannotbe con- Colorado, a politicalorganizationopposed tothe ttibuted to support or oppose an amendment. measure. Feel free to reproduce anddistribute theHowever, municipal officialsdesiring to con- brochure, but, of course, don't use public fundsin tributepersonal funds or knowing others who the process.wish tocontributein support or opposition to any Roleof Municipal Officials amendment may contact theCMLstaffforinfor- Municipal officials are stronglyencouraged to mation on political committees that are accepting becomeinvolvedwiththe issuesthataffecttheir contributions. municipalities. Elected andappointed officials Additional Information and municipalemployees have numerous oppor-CMI, hasjustpublished the September-October tunities toinfluencethe outcomeofthe vote.issueofColoradoMunicipalities magazine, which However, they are cautionedthatthere arestrict contains a great dealofinformation ontheballot legalprohibitions on expenditure ofpublic funds issuesofparticular municipal interest. Pleaserefer forthe purpose ofinfluencing passage ordefeatoftothemagazine forbackground information. ballotissues: Legalguidelines arecontainedin More information may beobtainedbycalling the materialspreviously distributed by CML andin CML, staff. theSeptember-October issue ofColorado Municipalitiesmagazine. Printedbelowis a Action checklist of some thingsmunicipal officials canActiveparticipationbypublic officialsand employees in an appropriate manner in their Checklistof Things municipal orindividual capacities isrequired now toinformcitizens regarding theeffects ofthe bal- Elected Officials CanDo lot measuresonlocal communities. Also, please Ask your municipal staff to analyze sharethesematerialswithother officialsin theAmendment'seffects onyour yourcommunity who are not onthisdistribu- municipality.tionlist. Adopt a resolution of support or opposition that describestheamend- ment'slocaleffects. On your own time, get information concerning theamendment'slocal consequences to your local newspa- per, radio, andothermedia. Write an op-ed piece, write a letter, or arrange an interview. On your own time, contact local business and civicleadersandmake sure they understand the localrami- ficationsoftheamendment. Encourage them to becomeactively involvedinnetworking and spread- ing the word. Check with your municipal attorney forfurtherclarification on Colorado'sCampaign Reform Act. 3/19/2013 A BU-81NE SECTION H M DENVERposr Alle ed scaman ers SEC ralses ared flagg g SrSbphenKeatiny oot6e street, thatI was taking other meain a securitieafraudhas angeredWashington andDen- Beyond the imageproblem, o.rn« Paeeu..n.swriw moneq, thet Iwas frateroixing;" caae broughtby t6eU.S. Attomey's verotficialsoft6e SEC. T6e agen- Neirnn's indictrceetraiees thedfa- ameaW. Nearen was feeling N~~ ~ attLetime. "BelieveOtticein Brootlyn. Ttreanests cy istanaiicalaboutconfLctot-imturping quratioi, e: Rne~er aqy ofT~ ~t,me, I'dloveto sitdownwit6 you came after an eight-moaW investi- terestappearances and many hiy'worlc at tteSrt. utainted. Atter a eeven-year career acros4thetable andlay thecardagationinvolving theFBI, SECandbr,okers fearitspolice powers.Withie aeel~s of leaving theDeirJ attheSecuHtiesaadEs- butI've beeniMornoedthafIIRS.d~~a~v~r SECof[ia inFebrnary o[ I995, change. CommiuioainDeova, the shouldheve nocommestonthoee TheindictmentaUeges thatthe tlont6at a lot ofpeople4ave spent iQearen w~ttowort as regulatory . attorney kftthefnveator watchdog ~6~~~ meohidrnMmloftwo compan?es a lotof yearsworkingon," said conaultaat to a Florida company agency laearly 1995 ~mdera doud Nearenaaid t6atveighty maband attempted toiMatet6ernm- William McLucas, the SEC'sdirec- whoseofficiaishehadiavatlQsted, otsuapicion. TheWaehington SEC ters WB'inthe balancebothingide panies' stockprice. Prosecutors torofenforceroeat inWashingtoe. accot'du?g totheindickmeot, which cfEice was piusuing aninternallo- anduutside theSEC. ° contend thathundredsofinvestors ~yye've aeverbeenaccusedofbr alSo UMestbMofficialr as dMen- veatigation ofNeane's acUvfUes, tt's 8 tanQledmeas," tle. said. lost money.iug. corcuptHopetully, we're dants. taeledinpartby ananonqmous let- itis eveamoreao today.Invdvemeatinthealleged scamnotint6ebusiness ofhavingpeople Nesrea's effortsinthatreQard terailepngimproprieties.Nearen, 47, wasarnstedandin• Ay a fotmerSECattomey who spe- workfor usw6o are going to sell itnowwheteverbody'ssayipg dictedearller thfsmonthwithfivecializedinsecnritiesfraud casestheiroffice."Please see SEC on14H i iendlieSkgortskiesr,.M"Aftiigtft ad"nsanismm~uslirs~are(aiiigsfd~eaorpibcApr~reYwraegua~Meb~eftitf~'ieeb~ Merchants 31d1ht ;A~o~r~o~; '•Y~MI~r fila~Uo~t t~rg~r~ 4 dM~Ee~help fund F y ; Co~t NMU . ~ ~ys ~ ~ 1~mPeYalleyFlegiorel `taanieo" L'o""~i Ze~ulelearrl llir A4PKArportpor~PcA y AaPortAiportt?1'kYde[?_:_ .i~Cour~y Ai1YK1lNeedExprese/+4UMieriran, Ihibd.: Mlerian,~or~e~liel, s#Lrt~.~.e.~fiw~14~GoI~hl~erdet0 l~ti6~. eyJettrey Leib s~t'~Ml~~10ltMIBB~,~, M~*AfIMfCd 0 i.=~E1. ` DenverPustBuunssaWribrA~oit+fainAkll.one .,~dWesterrt Ur~Aed; YVeslentVYestE~ess, A~ ;Ylfeelern4netiCli itist intimeforski 9easoq air serviceto Colorado's BmPadflC 1i4rE~+Bee taesailid.i*N19d~ JYMeeFerriExpieee YVa9~Bm skiresortsisbacktoits oldleveisafteraeveral lean years - but ata ptice. The price isbeiag paidin o ~ 'some mountain Wwnsbq lxal orthe '%-'97220,000286,500 155,600100,000 80,00080,400 merchants, wdoforthefirst ski s'timeare being asked tohelp subsidize oew jet service. Forthe upcomingeeawn, u Colorado'sdestioatian sE1 re- sorts report t6enumberofair- line seatsavailableAasin- ceasedfrom10percent to T5 r~T hseason be~y~inm~ld-De-. . cemberand ~asuntil lab . oreadApffl.wa~4 ~ WebotWmed outand now u cr: re coming back,,, saidJo4e 4New A'~~~,"I~re, ~~~PpM~ ileion~w oresidentofColoradoSki tldretOtlB ko~lt IMU.$; .Cormr~tal SAu~ nt eh A J Un~ed group that qerpqir pr ~esentat =1 I I . ' 1 [G- i181~1l~if/SOl'b IDMOlN LAfIB $~8(/~If~lI1C59t 8 "t, 1.4 v t re _ m~en -id o aa umouet of hardwork, Frew w.° therdorts andairlinea anoo tra¢t ~or . nd. Yetrre Etil1:.L ~ 3~ .eatiatylu` demm 6avea loagwayto ga.' . . Much ofthe cew ait'. se'vic~~ 4~_ to Cobrado tki datinadoae `i~ b DenverlnterntU'p~ ndEeading urafgtit forthe mountafm. Itincludeaoew neeatop~ ' . x ~ ,9~'tlighta fromLoaAng~ln, I.oais and Newark, N.7, (1n t!e NewYorkCitqarea~ a.i well ar: . plenned fli6htsDpWeetetu P115 cificAtrlines' commuter aidiaryMountain Air ~ frnmColorado Springi,x t , Y R" UaitedEspress c iaef l~':"fl~~ iromDenver ~ for aeaHy halfy/110b1'pwAettiliAt 4 Y nedsld-xason fligib.fdcxw'~' . iMI9~MNtemSbpBiilpBiYy`domonntain rmorb, ~t go,taeti induehg e= ibeeT-llufdeffld~P~ iBghba~oantad 1t wit.h` ilot0id Au",Ry~~ r. LWR~~ ~p.. ; iiwiwl 4M~ t Tl x • Reeorta ai! Tho am.?aoair.umm eosna PleeSe9!r 3/19/2013 Oh l(~C LU~rUl WI Air Semce to ski towns boom'l'ng year:after leanAIRLINES from Page 1H ketingmethodt wboat ski-seawnF mericao Alrlina foreer- from Newart. vicetravel. Vail wii? t" t0 ~~`+ h `0mmy~+f~ Da11aa WDuraago. Thia Vail's uae of coocierges on the ~ added that for the ~ igt Paconcivga"ti1111111.~ 1PurBa~'Y i+ offering agnarNewark fliu 4oNy 11 outot 1~0 flfrom Neark toaEagieCounyBAfrs glaunch o( nta WRdwAir for atarting nefor a~lu ~~tl ~ V~ 1°~0 ~Ble a~ suP~portWjth4B-uat deKavjllandlYlet demceErom Los Angeles S~~ yire tdon't t6is aeason. DurinB ~84ts, the ress, or Dah 8~rantees in case t6e air:Vail empioyeeswili assis~ic Afrl~~rango via Albuqueryue, MYe+s, andifit's succes~W, the re. I d ~ V~'mue targetgers witd reservtiooa for ePvry~asoo Colorado raorts a- Maverlck plans W aooa begin American endReeo will tiy MD- sort will eipaad the service.B~+aranlees andI've ~ PPortuairy to c thingfromakf echools to rental P~t a solid baostin airline aer- P~ngru nsfor itsairoret but80Iets. xatiog ae puny as IBO Vail,s p~ p ~ t, port t6e carrferatl!! needs to com• P~k ~ Dura o thispromotiooot noostopthat," said lyy~. "I ~ jt ec cars.vicethis seawn over last.08 aeasoo.tligdg from majorcities has the wrong mqyge ~ o~ air. So crucial are the mountain W~~pac plans W be P1ete fioa~ing and getep~i_ J~ ~tt ~ P~ bbrou 6t so iuany air travelers tu Elig6ts foraki areas that majur rn. nights from Colorado Spriagy o~ ato n fDepar~ eat Ttora its cal'lytCjyfrtomersomfwhoaeve n Westem Sloe~s typi• Eagle airport that airlioes 6ave places wityatfll: ay, stay ~o weanedfrom a de I'~ eort operawrstor years qave paid Pe airports in ~ryjre.tt on paaseng~), I p,ffl use aiNiaesto operateski-seaeon earlyDecember using9y.~at loo er at Purgato aod spend ~'~~e guaranceesin so~ PeY onany revep~lighu. Now, aome resorts areDO~er turboprop aimra[t. W~tern Pacific also needs mo rycases, we haven'tDOT certi[ication forita MAX6~ds a~ndcee9en•icey~ 1~0~ andM9erssaid. four years.^~~ 00a g~°~spreadingthe rnytof uoderwriting H'hile direct jet servicefrom o t6an othereirline servicetu small p~m~ majorU.S. cities toColorado rp- Afaverick, alr adytP~ ,e~ og ey ~~ory apokesma~fnt6eir rnmmuaLies.wrtsincreased in recent yqrs, tickeU forthemountain seMre, AndqLawlor, ahoacOs aki-vaca- Telluride andSWmboatSpringa commuter service from 16e INAX prqident TomMcC?aio tionhave Ukenthe leadin prpmoting Front Range to mountain re- saidjtyyproper jorWatern pa. g~ forTravel Store Inc.this airservice tithin6 b9 rcstau• 80~ °0~'dived two years ao LAx MBeks, saidthe neW ~llyrpats, accountants, rental ro 8cific tosellMAX ticketa ualer Aeooxrvitt toDurango from L.A.IP~nYwhen Contiaental ,~iri~p ~lt_ the pareotairline's certificate greatly en6aoceslus abilfty to owners, laundries and ot6er buai• i~ COOGpeD~I ~press ser- unqlMAX hasita own. Ifthepitc4 Purgatory uavacation des- Inmee. The merchants can eztvi~ 1° ~ eP~lamch ot11LV( ia delayed, West• tiaation.a oitt payback: Te1luNde Ski & Maverick Airways Corp, is p,c is respotWblefor refGoII Co. has lined up 16 percent ano~er commuter carrier try• the dckets or operacing ?pe pe ~ W~e feanmae airline xatafor the rnming n~r.otal fFa ~ gaP left bq Conti• mouutain (liglW, aaidMcClafa otleaving LA. hourswwn andSteambuat Ski & Resort P'~~ P~~~wrts DOT apokainan BillMosk Incredible Universeoffers you ~eCory. haa xcured 35 perceot more Maverick hopes tobeg intIY- would only say t at t e te d er8 l bly t 6e m t suc easful a fr mu ters, e le cuo ia an d WSest se lec don o fata.in g toSteamb oatSprings mu- a P+o&'emfaCoiorado ia run pecsonai m an e~P~~s inthe wodd. Now getContinental AiNine,y iethe yent dcipal airport andGrand Juna g~~ ~ 10°~g 1°~0 ~e legali- byVail AsBOCia~p. Xp2IT jtl hig~-~(~0iiclary ofTelluride'a largess, I~ tion's WalkerFieid nert moot4 t,reestPac's sale ofMAX TAe resurt comDecember, it ~vill begin -daiiytr01p ~pver Inceraa~onal Air-t6atItwlll have 74 panYPredicts Ou[ Commeraal Sa1es Represen~tive ~ a~~~~Montrose Jeffre3' t, a;e Percent more youruniquebusiness needs through volume discom~, aeab (lying into Fagle airportthis flfghb ~ L'Port. 85 from miles Aoustoo nort6 to ot theski ;nclude toeseasonwan ~se. SP~l purchases, custom shiPP~?B and other services. wo - a 6ig awitc5from last Bi°6 ewnpames, T-aL1rt 1'be reaortestlouates that airlirKS Wit6 a newterminal aoopto y forassistance.Year'r ooce-a-week xrvice,s6opa, accountingtirms, ratau. wiil otEer 155,000 eeafsiaW Ha UPort r~pectsw be ableNew jet urvlce totheHa den C80~ a°d att°rneys ~ta moreden, 22milp from SteamboaG y D~e ~~any as eig6t 757 jefs Contacc R~nGrahatp at aUp°rt 82miles westof Steamboat C0m°~ty ow°ersh~pofthe pro- T6e Purgatory resurt oortho( IYoa~ccasfW inllurinm~~Phoae: includes a dally TWA flight fromBram,~~ aaidTom Heae, Telluride 8 g pecial- St• Louis andAUanta and new dai- ~~O~OOda~°ns' vig president of ~ ran o alao paqhad notable aur (u htsfrom New Yort, ] 1~iy~ ~ F~;1q Unitedjet aervicefmm Cdica o. ~ 1~ and marketln ."Everyone c cess ~g ~w air xrvicefor the Deliaa, l~ino~~lia, Chicago and T~smTo date, about50 members ot ~e`~'" and the success. 11 t,o~ ,~npi~.There's no better way to dothe Steamboat Springs C6amber I° edd~t~°° to outrigptsubsidiey For a numper of years, the ~ 2aort Aasociation have rnntribut- aP idW airlineafor service, ~me aorthasotfered reveaue guaran- AmeNewr canr q6r~ip~ eiye (j~°g?~ b~~ ~ ~e Universe! moret6en =30,000 toward the ski res0rtsoffer carriees what areemboatAfrlineInvestment Pro- called "revenue gwrantees.,• am'sgoal of raisin8 $150,000 in T6ey requireairlines Wcompute FFbI ioe subsidies. Thelocal buai- ~ aP~ ofadding air seryfce tosesare asked tomake a conW- a rnmmunity aod t6en Wpottthatution to theairllne programt6at ti~ wi~ thecarrier's pmtit. If,natc6eat6eir c6amber ot com- etend oteac6 mooth, ur the endofnem dues.theaki aeaeon, the carrierhas notThe srbsidited flighw areworth ~ ade enough money to meetitsS~ r,,T,,~wid Sandy Evans, the Steam• kW ~rt makes upthedit• l~l~g +.cWtNl~t'g Med1?atc4amber'a interim esecutive fere°ce• evra;awt. ree new servicei, 7'eUaride Ski isoffering revmueYou or someone youknow suffersdai?j• fromixcted to bring anaddidooat 6uaranteeetoCondnental on ffa he2rtbuin000 vbitorsto Steamboat thk ~~Y -rvice from Houat~ toMon.P~~ afteteating, ypu ~y ~ q~-aaoa. Their apending will fflter ~ a~ 1aa1 businaees are6~p.s~ ~twn tothe entirepusiceu com• detrayNe cat. Montroae u 65 P~Cipate in 11+e- uniCy, shepid.miles notthoiTelluride andhao-h ~dy fiDi a Cu[ttinUy,Cwnpanieaio the 6ospitality in• dlre thebullc otthe resort'ajet ser-availabie heartburn9trY - wch u hotele andrestao- vice. I Ib - wily sa thebendits ot During the 1993-94 ski eeaeon,mediCadOA.asldf:iag airravitt, Evans wid airllnee tlew 142,000 eeata lntoh+S been Plaud wsee otherSteamboat SP~is• (Raor4 aod To Q~~YYou must beuncen - constructiu4 electric a6'lina 6auge t6eir rervlce bY the ai ltast 18, take antaCids, i oli compaNn, e,rcq o vetuy. pumber af avalLble "ay on allp~~ ~ the air bto a p~~lar datinati~).1 7lldbC UlCti-ftee.wbildy tuod. F~jOg t6e commuta-atr poll- Qualified a[tiCipanu tnhe tl wwn~ antryine tob9 ContinenW, the t+dort ~IP ayioe backfe~ the hitt6ey took iaw115,000alHiae eeabin wc6 o~t be C0~1ptt~Sated.meof theahutdown MContf- the laet two eeaean, l Eipress and ContioentalFor twu Years, we'vebeen trp.rction over the paattwo iog W getback W our piatoric level C~ures, i~ ~ aThat processdramatically ot aervice," a~d ys, q~CKS• ~:p~n~p~edair service to many qrpt- keting vice preaident tor~theo~ ei~ns, ;~ma;oe te~ sc~,~e~t c. 303) 443-7229 iE DENVERng theSteamboat and Tepu- For the upcoming aeason, I\\ r Traorts'Steamboat is Dack, andthm wme. F se,~ectt f/~CIASSiFIEDSoe rnmmuter carriers wereat- tedwltti Continental Airlines,6 slasAedopentlooa iuDenyer ng the period. eimpactot fewer airliae 6 1 9 9was simple anddirect for resorts. It wntributed tofew• ters atTeAuride last year,John Gusqtaon, the resort's The P,rvices manager. ttyearly teawnyeow was a A last seywnys aell, Dutair- ANCESi eats toTelluride and Mon• airports declined by20 per.rom twa seasons ago W last rnntributlag tothe 10 per-acline inakier visits toTellu• lopes. r auc6 adisappofnting yeyr, Yonts were asked to ante p"vi"airline subsidy program,stafwn. ear majorltyot our buai• mderstand the importance 198i~'sherc in an attord-1} 1. , nner," he said rds that air service comey accmtibIIity and aftorda- 1d e Reaoirt Accommoda- largest property manage. DPany inthe cnmmunfty,aineset6at contributed to subeidy program. rn tobroaden the tund• se for airline eervitt W1 Call i 6 3-2525 ir«AMM 3/19/2013 Ronaldti. Riley RECEIVED OCT 15 October10, 1996 Bob McLaurin, Town Manager BobArmour, Mayor Vail Town CouncilMembers: Sybill Navas, Paul Johnston, Ludwig Kurz, Kevin Foley, Michael Jewett, RobFord LarryGrafel, Director ofPublic Works NancySweeney, CoordinatorofArtinPublic.Places This morning, October 10, I wasinformed that SiebertCircle was discussedat lastTuesday's TownCouncil meeting andfurther morethat a reviewcommittee was appointed to oversee Siebert Circle issues. Giventheamountof property thatI personally own bordering SiebertCircle, how impactive theultimate design canbe onthat property, and myprior demonstratedlevelof interests, I am upset thatsomehowIhave been left outof theloop. Ihaveattended every meeting on SiebertCirclethat I had knowledge of. Iwas the only concernedcitizento appear at the Design ReviewBoard meeting whenWinston Associatesmadetheir presentation to narrowthe options topresent totheTown Councilin an effort to get final approvalduring thewinterof 95. Previously I hadofferedto provide the required space, at no charge, tohousetheboiler` equipment if a waterfeature was deemed desirable. I wasnever consulted as to whether ornotI wished to serveon thiscommittee or whoImight suggest to serve. In short, I very muchwishto beinvolved onthisissue to ensurethatthe very best design isadopted forthis unique location. Ron Riley RR/co 228Bnidgestveet, Vail, Colorado81657 ~ 303-476-3 1 09/4150 3/19/2013 Town Council meeting minutes of January 15, 2013 Page 1 Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:00 P.M. Vail Town Council Chambers The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by Mayor Andy Daly. Members present: Andy Daly, Mayor Kevin Foley Greg Moffet Margaret Rogers Susie Tjossem Members Absent: Kerry Donovan Ludwig Kurz Staff members: Stan Zemler, Town Manager Matt Mire, Town Attorney Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk _________________________________________________________________ The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. There was no public comment. The second item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda. Foley made a motion to approve the minutes of December 4, 2012, meeting. The motion was seconded by Tjossem. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Foley made a motion to approve the minutes of December 18, 2012, meeting and the motion was seconded by Moffet. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. The third item on the agenda was the Town Manager Report. Zemler informed the Council and public that the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) will begin construction at the end of April on the twin tunnel project near Idaho Springs. The construction and blasting will necessitate traffic being diverted onto the Frontage Road and back on to I-70 near the Central City exit. The construction and blasting will continue 24/7 from April through November, 2013. There will be three lanes eastbound. East and west bound lanes will be open but there will be 30 minute delays for blasting and safety purposes. The fourth item on the agenda was a request to table the first reading of Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2012, an Ordinance for prescribed regulation amendments, pursuant to Section 12-3- 7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to Section 12-8B-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to establish an allowable building height for golf course clubhouses within the outdoor recreation district, and to allow for amendments to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, to define the terms golf course and golf course clubhouse, and setting forth details in regard thereto. 3/19/2013 Town Council meeting minutes of January 15, 2013 Page 2 Moffet made a motion to table the first reading of Ordinance No. 21, 2012, to the February 5, 2013, meeting. The motion was seconded by Foley. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. The fifth item on the agenda was a request to table the first reading of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2012, an ordinance for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3- 7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of the Vail Golf Course parking lot from the General Use District to the Outdoor Recreation District, located at 1775 Sunburst Drive/Lot 3, Sunburst Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Moffet made a motion to table the first reading of Ordinance No. 22, 2012, to the February 5, 2013, meeting. The motion was seconded by Foley. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Foley said this item was also continued to the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting of January 28, 2013. The sixth item on the agenda was first Reading of Ordinance No. 2, Series of 2013, an Ordinance amending Section 6-3C-6 of the Vail Town Code to reconcile the Vail Town Code with the newly enacted Section 16 of Article XVIII of the Colorado Constitution (Amendment 64). Matt Mire, Town Attorney, said Colorado voters recently passed Amendment 64 which added a new Section 16 of Article XVIII regarding the personal use and regulation of marijuana. Amendment 64 allows local governments to prohibit the possession of marijuana and marijuana accessories by persons under the age of 21 years and to prohibit the open and public consumption of marijuana by persons of any age. It is the desire of the Council to pass legislation reconciling the Vail Town Code with Amendment 64 and to clarify and codify the town's prohibition of medical marijuana businesses. Daly asked if this ordinance would make the town code consistent with the Colorado state statutes. Mire said yes. Moffet made a motion to approve first reading of Ordinance No. 2, 2013, and the motion was seconded by Foley. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. The seventh item on the agenda was the reading of Ordinance No. 3, Series of 2013, An Emergency Ordinance Adopting a Temporary Ban on Marijuana Establishments in the Town, Pursuant to the Newly Enacted Section of Article XVIII of Colorado Constitution (Amendment 64). Matt Mire, Town Attorney, stated pursuant to Article XVIII, § 16(5)(f) of the Colorado Constitution, the town may "prohibit the operation of marijuana cultivation facilities, marijuana product manufacturing facilities, marijuana testing facilities, or retail marijuana stores through the enactment of an ordinance." He said this emergency ordinance allows staff time to study the effects of such marijuana establishments, consider the town's existing land use regulations and master plan and thereafter provide information to the Council as to whether such uses should be permitted at any location in the Town. During such time, the Council finds and determines that it is the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare for the town to adopt a temporary ban on the location of marijuana establishments in the town and the Council finds and determines that an emergency exists, to prevent marijuana establishments from 3/19/2013 Town Council meeting minutes of January 15, 2013 Page 3 locating in the town during the time that town staff is studying the effects of such establishments and the proper location for such establishments and if they will be permitted in town. The moratorium is valid until August 6, 2013, at which time the Council can then apply consistent regulations as the State of Colorado (State). The State has until July 1, 2013, to finalize language. Moffet said nuisance and odor issues will also need to be addressed. Rogers said this moratorium will be in place until the State gives guidance and allows the town to review local ordinances. This doesn’t mean the town will be banning anything but this ordinance just delays the process until the town staff finds out how to best regulate this process. Moffet made a motion to approve emergency Ordinance No. 3, 2013, and the motion was seconded by Rogers. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. The eighth item on the agenda was an update on Ford Park Phase 2. This update to the Council includes a status report of the Phase 1 Construction progress and schedule, the submittal to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) of the Phase 2 Development Plan for Ford Park and a request by the Vail Valley Foundation (VVF) to proceed through the Development Plan process. Greg Hall, Public Works Director, stated there are three items to be discussed; the Phase II Development Plan, Phase I items under construction and additional design work needed. The second phase deals with the covered social court yard at the Amphitheater; improvements to Betty Ford Way; the Betty Ford Alpine Garden (BFAG) education building; the box office improvements; the Ford family tribute; riparian restoration, playground improvements and permanent exhibit space which are all interrelated. Staff requested Council provide comments on the Ford Park Phase II Development Plan submittal to the PEC and grant permission to the VVF to proceed through the Phase II development process. Zemler said the Ford Tribute is now scheduled to be adjacent to the covered social court yard. All of the Phase II components are unfunded projects. The Council wanted to know who made the decision to move the Ford Tribute to the social courtyard instead of at the juncture of the Manor Vail entrance and Betty Ford Way. Pedro Campos, Landscape Architect with Zehren and Associates, said the cottage for AIPP needed to stay in this area. Adding the Ford Tribute created too much congestion in this area. So given the AIPP concerns and discussion with the VVF, because of the congestion in this area, they moved the tribute piece to the social area in front of the Amphitheater. Tjossem said if the space is too tight; take the tribute arrival monument out. Campos said an arrival component still needed to be there to announce people have arrived in Ford Park. Way finding solutions and landscape solutions are still being discussed and there is still a need to allow for large vehicles to come and go on Betty Ford Way. Further discussion ensued. Council was concerned the commons area of the lower bench open space has too many art zones. They want as much open space as possible in the lower bench. Campos said additional landscaping is in select corner areas where trees exist already and wouldn’t interfere with the open areas of the park. Further discussion ensued regarding the open space being sacred in 3/19/2013 Town Council meeting minutes of January 15, 2013 Page 4 the lower bench, possible additional landscape areas and possible art areas. If the AIPP cottage stays, it needs to be improved as well. Daly asked where the money for Phase II is coming from. Campos stated the VVF is fundraising. The original budget was approximately $7 million for Phase 1 and Phase II. However the scope of Phase II is growing and there are unfunded portions of Phase II including improving the picnic shelter. Rogers asked about the existing trees in the lower bench and the landscaping proposed around the lawn area. Campos said enhancing the landscaping along Betty Ford Way is one of the goals to make it more memorable. Ceil Folz, VVF, said the goal is to raise $6 million. The VVF has $3 million so far. They believe that they have another $1 million that is good and another $2 million they feel pretty good about. Their intention is to have all the fundraising completed by the beginning of the summer. Most donors are part-time residents. Some of the benefactors are John and Marlene Boll who are Beaver Creek residents; Mike and Mary Sue Shannon who are Vail residents and Lyda Hill. Daly asked if the VVF goal to provide the BFAG $1 million was still in the mix. Folz stated the VVF is going to provide $1 million for the BFAG education center. Any additional money for the education center above and beyond the $1 million is the responsibility of the BFAG. Daly stated the Council needs to give the VVF permission to move ahead with Phase II of the project. Foley stated in the documents submitted it said that Phase II is to design and construct Phase II. He wants more public comment. Rogers stated this approval just give the VVF permission to proceed through process and is not an approval for the design or construction. Campos said they were going to hold public work sessions with the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) in February to get their thoughts before moving forward and coming back to Council. Greg Hall asked if the Council was okay at this time with the design components of Phase II. Foley made a motion to allow the VVF to proceed through the planning process and Rogers seconded the motion. Daly said there were a lot of elements that will require significant review. He said the approval from Council to go through the development planning process is in no way approving the elements and design. He stated that approval from Council will have to be done in the future. He is very concerned there is too much stuff being added to the park. He said the goal is to preserve the open space in the park and keeping the character intact for the kids and to have a large play area. He said the common area needs to be held sacred and the whole area needs to be safe and fun for kids to play. He also wanted to make sure the Ford tribute and recognition is appropriate in size and quality to the contribution they made to Vail. Foley agreed with Daly on the tribute to the Ford’s. Hall said event producers have been notified of the Phase II schedule. Zemler said all the field improvements were moved back one year. Staff will make sure the public is informed about the fields being out of commission for the summer of 2014. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. The ninth item on the agenda was Adjournment. 3/19/2013 Town Council meeting minutes of January 15, 2013 Page 5 As there was no further business, Moffet made a motion to adjourn and the motion was seconded by Foley. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Attest: __________________________________ Andrew P. Daly, Mayor ________________________________ Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Information Updates and Attachments: 1) CSE March 6, 2013 Draft Minutes ATTACHMENTS: CSE 030613 Draft Meeting Minutes 3/19/2013 CSE/Meeting Minutes March 6, 2013 Page 1 of 5 MINUTES: Town of Vail: Commission on Special Events Meeting Town Council Chambers __________________Wednesday, March 6, 2013 @ 8:30 a.m.______________ CSE Members Present: Jenn Bruno Sonny Kerstiens Rayla Kundolf Bobby Bank Dave Chapin Barry Davis Amy Cassidy TOV Staff Present: Sybill Navas, CSE Coordinator Tammy Nagel, CSE Secretary Clare Hefferren, CSE Intern Kelli McDonald, Economic Development Director Others Present: Adam Sutner, Strategic Consultant to the CSE Margaret Rogers, Vail Town Council Member Robin Litt, Vail Jazz Festival James Deighan, Jeff Brausch and Missy Johnson: Highline Brian Nolan and Matt Morgan, Vail Restaurant Group Euginnia Manseau, Noram Cup/Ski and Snowboard Club Vail John Knight, The America Cup International Fly Fishing Tournament Scott Rednor and Ashley Erickson, Shakedown ______________________________________________________________________ CSE Chair, Jenn Bruno, called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. Administrative Items: • Approval of the Minutes of the meeting of the CSE meeting held February 6, 2013. Motion to approve the Minutes of the meeting of February 6, 2013, as presented. M/S/P: Chapin/Davis/Unanimous. • Overview of 2013 Budget: Navas reviewed the 2013 CSE budget that was provided in the committee’s packets. Members did not have any questions or concerns. Event Liaison Update to the CSE: 3/19/2013 CSE/Meeting Minutes March 6, 2013 Page 2 of 5 • PINK Vail: This March 9, 2013 event is a tier 2 event that was allocated $10,000.00 from CSE. Hefferren reported the event producer is doing a steller job on marketing with an editorial in Denver’s 5280 magazine. • Vail Film Festival: Is a tier 2 event scheduled for March 28 – 31, 2013 and received a $40,000.00 allocation from the CSE. Hefferren reported 5 of the 11 marketing gates are completed and the event is on schedule. • Taste of Vail: The Taste of Vail will be April 4-6, is a tier 2 event and CSE has allocated $30,000.00 towards this event. Hefferren reported the event producer has completed 10 of 11 marketing gates and is ahead of schedule. Highlights of the up coming event include a Nordic Wine Tour and The Restaurant Night. Special Event Recap: NORAM Cup/Ski and Snowboard Club Vail Euginnia Manseau, representing Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, presented a brief recap of the NORAM Cup to the CSE members. Manseau said that due to difficult snow conditions earlier in the week, the Vail Race Crew, SSCV staff and visiting coaches worked hard into the evenings to make the snow the best condition possible. Manseau stated that for both years the SSCV has hosted the FIS Noram Cup, they have exceeded the expectations of all the parties involved. Attendees came from local, regional, out of state, International. There were 17 countries represented by international athletes, plus athletes from Eastern, Central, Rocky and Western regions of the USA. Manseau stated the FIS Noram Cup is just a step below the World Cup level and many of these athletes will be returning to Vail to compete in the 2015 World Cup Championships. Vail America Days: Jeff Brausch, Highline Sports and Entertainment, presented an RFP for the event Vail America Days July 4-6, 2013 to CSE members. With the 4th falling on a Thursday this year, Brausch highlighted a five year window of opportunity that the event will straddle, or fall within, a weekend. Brausch stated Highline Sports and Entertainment would like the event to have more of a family festival atmosphere by having the Fourth of July parade, fireworks, entertainment throughout the afternoon, children’s activities, food and beverage hospitality and more, and that they are looking at venues including Mountain Plaza, Solaris, Arrabelle and Gore Creek Drive. The street festival atmosphere will be continued through the 5th and the 6th, and the Farmers’ Market will carry the fun into Sunday. The event will be marketed through both social and traditional media with front range and regional advertising, and will package the information for all of the weekend’s events and activities which will include the Vail Lacrosse Shootout and the kick-off of the Jazz at Vail Square series on Thursday evening. McDonald suggested working closely with TOV staff to alleviate the issues, including the large gaps, with the parade. Kundolf requested a marching band in the parade and recruiting local high school students to assist with volunteer staffing. Bank suggested including the lacrosse teams in the parade and possibly hosting lacrosse demonstrations and clinics. 3/19/2013 CSE/Meeting Minutes March 6, 2013 Page 3 of 5 Motion to approve the transfer of the allocation of $40,000, and the associated contract with Zambelli Fireworks in the amount of $31,500, from Human Movement Management to Highline for the purpose of putting on the 2013 Vail America Days. M/S/P: Davis/ Kerstiens /Unanimous FEAST! Vail: Jeff Deighan, Highline Sports and Entertainment, talked with members about the new Memorial Day Weekend event, FEAST! Vail. FEAST! Vail will provide an opportunity to showcase the culinary “chops” and lifestyle that Vail offers as a top destination, not only by Vail’s stand-alone talent but pairing the ocal talent up with and against the most renowned talent from the Front Range. Deighan stated that there are several local chefs interested in participating in this event. Event attendees will learn tricks of the trade, sample, be amazed, and get inspired with 12 custom seminars daily. There will be morning lifestyle events all paired with a signature brunch that promote exercising while still honing in on a participants epicurean side. The event will roll into the evening with lively après events where you can meet and mingle with guest chefs. For a more exclusive approach attendees can come to one of the intimate wine paired dinners which will bring them face to face with guest chefs working together with some of Vail’s finest talent to present a dinner for guests to remember. Bank asked whether the word “FEAST!” insinuates the concept of “luxury,” which received very negative response during the focus group research. Rogers responded that her reaction was just the opposite, that the word depicts a “medieval” image. Sutner observed that we have the opportunity to “define what “FEAST!” means” and to position it as a “living well” component of Vail’s focus on Health and Wellness. Bruno asked what options will be provided for kids. Deighan responded that Katie Tille, who will be the event director for Highline, is an expert in that area and will develop a spate of activities that will most likely be free. Kundolf asked if the “food trucks” concept was “gone?” Deighan replied that he did not know yet, but added that events are only viable if they work for their sponsors. The Friday night, May 24, kickoff is intended to provide a social gathering, with casual, light food in small portions from 3-5pm. Key for restaurant support is “small portions that don’t compete with dinner.” Since Brian Nolan and Matt Morgan had not yet arrived, Bruno asked if there was any New Business to discuss. New Business and Community Input: • Scott Rednor, one of the owners of Shakedown, approached the CSE board with an idea of his bar hosting a concert at the top of Bridge Street on the weekend the mountain closes for the winter and at the end of summer. Rednor stated he was not requesting any funding from the CSE, just their input. Chapin thought it was a great idea but not for that weekend, since Highline will be hosting Spring Back to Vail and there are concerts scheduled from Friday night through 3/19/2013 CSE/Meeting Minutes March 6, 2013 Page 4 of 5 Sunday night. Chapin suggested hosting the concert on Thursday night. Navas stated that approving an independent street concert in the middle of Spring Back to Vail would stress the Town’s resources and might conflict with Highline’s ability to control the brand of Spring Back to Vail. • Margaret Rogers gave the members a brief recap of the Town Council retreat that was held on February 26, 2013. Rogers stated Council is considering having Health & Wellness events be incorporated through CSE funding as well as the iconic events, such as the Jazz Festival, Bravo and International Dance Festival, all of which would increase the CSE’s funding budget. Rogers also stated some Council members were suggesting to combine the CSE and VLMDAC boards. McDonald suggested that members come to her with their comments, since she is part of the task force committee that Stan Zemler has been requested to set up in order to develop a recommendation for the Council’s consideration. • Deighan shared an email from Jake Burton thanking everyone who helped put on the Burton US Snowboard Championship, stating it was an “epic event.” Vail Restaurant Week: Brian Nolan, Group 970 accompanied by Matt Morgan, Sweet Basil and Mountain Standard, referred to the proposal included in the Commission’s packets, spoke with members about teaming up with Beaver Creek on a cooperative marketing effort for Vail/Beaver Creek Restaurant Week, with fall dates as yet TBD. Nolan is requesting the remaining $21,500 in the CSE’s budget for this project and stated it could be marketed in two ways: either together or as two separate events that occur at the same time. Nolan explained that the concept would be a combined week of special offerings from the entire “willing” restaurant community of both Beaver Creek and Vail and will be centered on the year we are in, $20.13. Each restaurant will choose their own $20.13 deals to be offered up during any meal segment(s) they choose. He stated that 100% of the Beaver Creek restaurants that are open during the time frame chosen will participate, but that he was unsure of the Vail restaurant participation. Sutner observed that a combined effort “statistically favors Vail” and that the “power of two” increases the benefit to the consumer. Matt Morgan, noting that he only has restaurants in Vail, admitted that he did not know whether all of the restaurants will want to participate, but stated that he likes the approach, and the compelling power in numbers that the Vail/Beaver Creek approach can deliver. Kundolf stated that it needs to be made clear that this is a cooperative marketing effort. Bruno noted that the project is compatible with the CSE’s mission. Motion to allocate funding in the amount of $21,500 for Vail/Beaver Creek Restaurant Week, contingent on the VLMDAC allocating marketing support and funding from Beaver Creek Resort to match the combined allocations from both the VLMD and the Commission on Special Events. 3/19/2013 CSE/Meeting Minutes March 6, 2013 Page 5 of 5 M/S/P: Kundolf/ Davis/Unanimous Adjournment: Motion to adjourn @ 10:00 a.m. M/S/P: Kundolf/ Chapin /Unanimous The annual “Brown Bag Lunch” discussion between the CSE, ERC members and local event producers followed at 10:30 a.m. The highlight of the meeting was Mike Richards’ and Mike Griffin’s presentation of the new on-line Special Event Permit application. Next CSE Meeting: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 @ 8:30 a.m. 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from Mayor and Council 3/19/2013 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: March 19, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Ford Park Phase I Site Visit 3/19/2013