HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-04-02 Agenda and Support Documentation Town Council Evening SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING SESSION AGENDA
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, CO 81657
6:00 P.M., APRIL 2, 2013
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot
be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider
an item.
1. ITEM/TOPIC: Citizen Participation (15 min)
2.
ITEM/TOPIC: Consent Agenda:
1) Approval of March 5 and 19 meeting minutes;
2) Proclamation No. 2, Series of 2013 Mayors Day of Recognition for
National Service
3) Proclamation No. 3, Series of 2013 Colorado Architecture Month (5 min.)
3.
ITEM/TOPIC: Town Manager Report:
1) Tree Removal discussion (5 min.)
4.
ITEM/TOPIC: A public hearing to discuss master planning for Gerald R.
Ford Park. (90 Minutes)
PRESENTER(S): George Ruther
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Should Town staff prepare proposed
amendments to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan to include the 1997 Ford
Park Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan
Amendments, adopted by the Town Council on April 12, 2012 (i.e.,
Resolution No. 17, Series of 2012)?
BACKGROUND: The Vail Town Council is considering whether to propose
amendments to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan which would include, all or
some of, the recommendations contained in the 1997 Ford Park
Management Plan and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment.
The planning documents for Ford Park are used in the development review
process to guide decision making for future development and improvements
to the park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Town staff recommends the Town Council
engages in a public discussion regarding possible amendments to Ford
Park. Following the public discussion, staff recommends the Town Council
determines whether to propose amendments to the 1985 Ford Park Master
Plan. If it is determined that amendments are needed, staff recommends the
Town Council clearly articulates its expectations for the proposed
amendments.
5. ITEM/TOPIC: Appoint one member to the Vail Local Marketing District
Advisory Committee (VLMDAC). (5 min.)
4/2/2013
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Council interviewed all
interested parties at the work session and Council should appoint one
member to the VLMDAC for one eight month term, April 2, 2013 - December
31, 2013.
BACKGROUND: The Town received four letters of interest for the open
position on the VLMDAC as follows: Michael Holton; Sonny Kerstiens; Liana
Carlson Moore; Jeff Morgan; Patrica McNamara
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Council interview each
applicant at the work session and appoint one member to the VLMDAC at
the evening meeting.
6.
ITEM/TOPIC: 2012 Year-end Investment Report (10 min.)
PRESENTER(S): Judy Camp
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: No formal action requested -
informational only
BACKGROUND: Section 2-2-8 of the Town Code requires an annual
presentation of the town's investment report, which is also provided as a
written report each quarter. This agenda item is a presentation of the town's
investment report as of December 31, 2012.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None
7.
ITEM/TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
supplementing the 2013 budget (10 min.)
PRESENTER(S): Kathleen Halloran
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or approve with
amendments Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
BACKGROUND: Please see attached memo
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve or approve with amendments
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
8. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (8:20 p.m.)
4/2/2013
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2013
ITEM/TOPIC: Citizen Participation
4/2/2013
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2013
ITEM/TOPIC: Consent Agenda:
1) Approval of March 5 and 19 meeting minutes;
2) Proclamation No. 2, Series of 2013 Mayors Day of Recognition for National Service
3) Proclamation No. 3, Series of 2013 Colorado Architecture Month
ATTACHMENTS:
March 5, 2013 Town Council Meeting Minutes
March 19, 2013 Town Council Meeting Minutes
Proclamation No. 2, Series of 2013 Mayors Day of Recognition for National Service
Proclamation No. 3, 2013 Colorado Architecture Month
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 5, 2013 Page 1
Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
6:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by
Mayor Andy Daly.
Members present: Andy Daly, Mayor
Kerry Donovan
Kevin Foley
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro-tem
Greg Moffet
Margaret Rogers
Susie Tjossem
Staff members: Stan Zemler, Town Manager
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
_________________________________________________________________
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Both Kevin Foley and Susie Tjossem
both asked to recognize the passing of long-time Vail supporters and residents, Cyrus Allen
(Buck Allen’s father) and June Simonton, local artist and writer.
The second item on the agenda was the Town Manager’s Report. Ron Braden, IT Director,
gave an update on AT&T and issues with this carrier. A tower has been constructed at Public
Works and both AT&T and Verizon hope to be on line by the summer of 2013, with ultimate
build out planned for this coming fall. While 4G coverage is still sporadic, the signal is getting
better and stronger and the community should see better propagation east of the golf course.
Verizon may also be on the Public Works tower. Inside the Village Parking Structure should
continue to improve. Ron Riley, East Vail resident and restaurateur, noted 200 people had
responded by e-mail to his Vail Daily full page ad. Of those, 187 filled out the questionnaire and
of those 187, 145 believed there would be an adverse economic effect due to the coverage
difficulties over the holidays. Respondents were angry and frustrated.
Additionally, under “new business,” Greg Moffet moved to ask Council to work with staff to table
the upcoming Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) application for the Ford Park
Phase II projects (scheduled for March 11) to April 22 in order to allow Council to do a site visit
to Phase I Ford Park improvements on March 19. He requested Council be able to look at
Phase II projects based on conditions now created by Phase I. He further moved to schedule a
public hearing on March 19 to discuss the Ford Park Management Plan. This two-part motion
was seconded by Kevin Foley. The motion passed 6-1, Rogers opposed.
The third item on the agenda was second reading of an ordinance repealing and re-enacting
Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2010, re-establishing the approved development plan and
development standards for site coverage, density and landscaping for Special Development
District No. 37, Tivoli Lodge, in accordance with Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures,
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 5, 2013 Page 2
Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to an accommodation unit, an office and a meeting
room, at the Tivoli Lodge, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/ Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5th
Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Chief of Planning Warren Campbell noted there had been no changes or modifications since the
first reading. With that, Moffet moved to approve Ordinance #5 on second reading, with a
second from Ludwig. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The fourth item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2012, an
ordinance for prescribed regulation amendments, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail
Town Code, to allow for amendments to Section 12-8B-7, Height, Vail Town Code, to establish
an allowable building height for golf course clubhouses within the outdoor recreation district, and
to allow for amendments to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code, to define the terms golf
course and golf course clubhouse, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
The applicant requested Council table the public hearing of Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2012,
to the January 8, 2013, Council meeting. Zemler asked that it be tabled to the January 15,
2012, public meeting because the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) won’t meet
until January 14, 2013. The applicant is again requesting tabling to March 19, 2013.
Moffet moved, with a dual second from Tjossem and Kurz, to table Ordinance No. 21, Series of
2012, until March 19. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The fifth item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2012, an
ordinance for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment,
Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of the Vail Golf Course parking lot from the General Use
District to the Outdoor Recreation District, located at 1775 Sunburst Drive/Lot 3, Sunburst Filing
3, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
The applicant requested Council table the public hearing of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2012 to
the January 8, 2013 public meeting. Zemler asked that this item be tabled to the January 15,
2013, public meeting as well. The applicant is again requesting tabling to March 19, 2013.
Moffet moved, with a second from Tjossem, to table Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2012, to the
March 19 evening meeting. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The sixth item on the agenda was adjournment.
There being no further business, Moffet moved, with a second from Donovan, to adjourn the
meeting at 6:20 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Attest: __________________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
___________________________________
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2013 Page 1
Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
6:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by
Mayor Andy Daly.
Members present: Andy Daly, Mayor
Kerry Donovan
Kevin Foley
Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro-tem
Greg Moffet
Margaret Rogers
Susie Tjossem
Staff members: Stan Zemler, Town Manager
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
_________________________________________________________________
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. There was none.
The second item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda.
a. Foley moved, with a second from Kurz, to approve the February 5 minutes. A
vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously, 7-0.
b. Foley asked these be considered separately because there was an addition to
the minutes to include a comment from Susie Tjossem acknowledging the passing of June
Simonton. Foley move to approve the February 19 minutes, with a second from Donovan. A
vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The third item on the agenda was Town Manager Report. George Ruther, Community
Development Director, reported on the Public Information Sign Options at the Lionshead
Parking Structure and requested direction from the Council. Ruther stated the town is exempt
from the sign code, but suggested the following standards be followed: compatibility
(appropriately sized); sign surface (non-reflective); lighting fixtures (shall not shine light onto
adjacent properties); electrical wiring (concealed); sign maintenance (kept in good repair); wind
pressure and dead load (compliance with IBC); and moving parts (prohibited). Donovan
questioned who we were trying to direct and suggested the brown “I” on the north side only of
the tower be installed. Tjossem said it should be compatible with the overall wayfinding
program. Foley, Kurz, Rogers, Moffet and Donovan all signed approval for moving forward with
its installation.
The fourth item on the agenda was the Ford Park Master Plan and Management Plan Public
Discussion. Ruther explained an overview of the questions for Council had been presented at
the afternoon work session. Questions before the Council were: Does the Town Council have
concerns with the direction recommended for Ford Park based upon the existing planning
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2013 Page 2
documents (1985 Master Plan, 1997 Management Plan and 2012 Management Plan
Amendments)? If so, what are those concerns and why are they of concern?
The three options for the review of the current Ford Park Phase II Improvements application
are: 1) Continue forward with the recommendations of the Ford Park Management Plan
Amendment and take no action (no policy or implementation concerns); or 2) Withdraw the
Owner’s consent to proceed through the development review process prior to the PEC public
hearing on April 8 and direct staff to immediately initiate amendments to the master plan and
management plan (policy concerns); or 3) Call up/appeal the final decision of the PEC on the
development application after the public hearing on April 8 (implementation concerns).
Ruther outlined the master plan history and the chronology of events (see Community
Development Memorandum dated March 19, 2013), ending with the following conclusions: 1)
Ford Park has been the town’s longstanding solution to providing for the recreational needs of
residents of the community, our visitors and guests; 2) The 1985 Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan
Park Master Plan, as adopted in 1985, and later amended in 1997 and 2012, remains relevant
and in effect today; 3) The three documents (the Master Plan, the Management Plan and the
Management Plan Amendment) are a combined planning document for decision making
purposes; 4) The 1997 Ford Park Management Plan articulated six major goals statement
aimed at guiding future development decisions. Those goal statements, along with those
articulated in the 1985 Master Plan, established the town’s intentions for development within the
park in 1997; 5) An outcome of the town’s planning efforts in 1996-97 resulted in the Betty Ford
Garden Education Center being relocated out of Ford Park and onto the soccer field parking lot
on Vail Valley Drive; 6) The Management Plan amendments adopted by the Council in 2012
altered the policy direction for development in Ford Park from what had been established in
1997; 7) Policy direction established by the town allows “administrative offices” and “education
centers” in Ford Park, subject to review, and a finding of compliance with the planning
documents; 8) The 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment established illustrative
plans and descriptive narrative for “appropriate improvements and activities in the park;” 9) The
illustrative plans and descriptive narrative speaks generally, and specifically, to the development
of an education center and amphitheater improvements, among numerous other physical
improvements throughout the park; and 10) Those development applications for physical
improvements which most closely adhere to the implementation strategies prescribed in the
Management Plan Amendment have the greatest likelihood of being approved.
Daly clarified the process which is to discuss the Master Plan only and not specific projects.
This applies to both the Council and the public. He also stated in the 1997 Management Plan
there was contained adequate guidance for future decisions with no additional significant user
groups or uses. However, some potential conflicts were not resolved at that time, with disputes
being handled by the Office of the Town Manager. It was clear that no event or program could
dominate the park.
Donovan asked why the 2012 Amendments were applied to the 1997 Management Plan vs. the
1985 Master Plan, and shouldn’t the amendments have applied to the Master Plan instead.
When she asked who made the amendment application, the response was the four
stakeholders: Vail Valley Foundation (VVF), Vail Recreation District (VRD), Betty Ford Alpine
Gardens (BFAG) and the Town of Vail (TOV).
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2013 Page 3
While this may be, Rogers stated, there were several open public meetings at Manor Vail.
Ruther responded that there were also public Council meetings, open houses and Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC) meetings where several versions were reviewed. He also
said a significant part of the management plan was not changed in any way. Daly noted there
had never been an update on the noise issues at the Amphitheater, as promised, and this
resolution was missing from the 2012 Amendment.
Foley stated at the January 15 Council meeting, there should have been more history shared
from the1996-97 process. Tjossem questioned whether the changes made in Resolution 17,
2012, had made permanent changes or was the Council still in the thought phase. She said
there was specific language in conflict with the amended plan (Memo page 6). Tjossem says a
lot of people felt this was under the radar and did not resonate to the surface. This was seen as
a placeholder and not a given. Rogers said the BFAG Education Center was moved; however,
objectives and policies were still in place. Tjossem noted Council was not as educated about
the verbiage in the ’85 and ’97 plans.
Rogers pointed out in April of 2012, Donovan had openly stated, “We have given ourselves
permission to use the term placeholder.” Donovan commented this community was pretty savvy
but the changes to the park did not carry the gravitas and did not evoke the weighty changes, a
gross error. She said the Management Plan is more an addendum to the original Master Plan
so the Amendment in 2012 was adopted in error.
Kurz weighed in saying the Council should stay the course and move forward with the language
and intent or the 2012 Amendment. Tjossem and Moffet both noted they had been mistaken in
voting in favor of the amendment.
At this point, Daly opened comment to the public, again reminding everyone comments were to
pertain only to the Master Plan and not to any specific projects.
Those in favor of leaving the 2012 Amendment in place were: Jack Hunn, on behalf of the Ford
Park stakeholders; Harry Frampton, who noted “everyone” owns Ford Park, the VVF had fund-
raised $4M for both Phase I and II, which would put that money in jeopardy and Vail must
remain competitive; Nicola Ripley, Executive Director with BFAG, asked Council not to
withdraw its support and to continue with the amended plan; Mike Charles, Vail resident, who
asked not to lose sight of “ends to the means” and to stay with the plan; Bob Fritch, treasurer of
BFAG, who stated in good faith the Gardens moved forward with planning and withdrawing
support would leave BFAG in a very bad position; Sheika Gramshammer, who claimed she was
a part of the old guard but said now is the time to proceed; June Vanorek, BFAG board
member, asked Council not to go back on their word and to please approve what’s in the best
interest of the town; Jackie Benson, Advisory Board for BFAG, was totally shocked to hear the
Council might withdraw support after they’d done so much to move forward; Gwen Scalpello,
BFAG board, stated the Amendment in 2012 was consistent with past master and management
plans and the town was surrounded by open space; Susan Schwimm, who works for the
Gardens, said this would be a great amenity for residents and tourists so to move forward with
the plan as amended; Liz Paxon, President of the BFAG, stated the building was consistent with
the Master Plan and to not withdraw support; Liz Campbell, Development Director with BFAG,
asked to support the Master Plan and not to fall short; Susan Milhoan, a fundraiser who had
been working with El Pomar, the Gates and Daniels Foundations, said she couldn’t believe
approval could be redacted; and Ceil Folz, President of the VVF, stated there would have to be
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2013 Page 4
a reconsideration of the consequences this action would trigger re: their fund raising plus
working out a new concept would cause a delay of at least two years.
Those in favor of Council’s withdrawing their support included: Jonathan Staufer, resident and
business owner, who thanked Council for revisiting the topic, which he felt was a mark of good
government. He felt the citizens did not have all the facts and with all due respect to both the
Gardens and the Foundation, certain things don’t belong in the park; Joe Staufer, resident and
former Councilmember, reminded Council that if the City of New York had said “yes” to all of its
development proposals for Central Park, it would’ve been built over 2-1/2 times by now and that
the Master Plan needed to be re-examined; Billy Suarez, local resident and business owner,
stated Council should look into new information and not be afraid to consider all of the
information available; Tom Steinberg, resident and former Councilmember, stated as a 47 year
resident of Vail he encouraged throwing out the Management Plan and starting over, doing a
2013 Master Plan – the park has been abused in the past and this cannot happen in the future;
Dick Cleveland, resident and former Mayor, thanked Council for reconsidering the Master Plan
and asked Council to limit further development and leave the park viability as it exists today;
Bob Armour, resident and former Mayor, agreed that Cleveland’s comments were spot on and
Council should re-visit the ’97 plan; Hermann Staufer, resident and former Councilmember, said
to re-look, re-think and re-do the Master Plan; Galen Aasland, local resident, asked to
reconsider the plan since there isn’t a lot of green left in the town any longer; and Kaye Ferry,
resident, said if Council didn’t look at the Master Plan again, it would be death from a thousand
cuts.
Foley questioned whether the Phase I improvements were fully funded and was told yes – and
that Phase II still required approvals from both the Design Review Board (DRB) and the PEC,
after which Council could call up either board’s decision. Tjossem said approvals were given
only for Phase I improvements. Further, she stated everyone is using “permission to proceed
through the process” as an explicit approval. That is not correct. Council had only agreed to let
the applicant proceed through the process. Council did not give its stamp of approval so this is
a cart before the horse situation. The word permission is misconstrued.
Rogers stated this is a perfect analogy for the Ever Vail process, where this is but one of the
things we wanted to see in the park and showed it on the map. Tjossem said the placeholder is
merely a concept, which is the basis of why we’re all here tonight. Mixed signals have been
given and there are multiple impressions of what’s been approved. Kurz said he did not base
his support of moving forward on the Foundation’s potential financial trouble if this is stalled or
honoring the Ford family. He said it’s the right decision and the community will gain from it. It’s
the right thing to do at the right time.
Donovan moved to withdraw the owner’s consent to proceed through the process, with a
second from Foley (for discussion purposes). Moffet noted the Master Plan is not known or
understood in the community. And while this would appear to be somewhat unprofessional
government, he is leaning toward not supporting the consent to proceed.
Daly said the site plan depicting improvements is conceptual and not a commitment; however,
Council gave permission to go through the process and should honor that commitment.
A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-3, Daly, Kurz and Rogers opposed.
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2013 Page 5
Daly clarified next steps to re-examine the master plan and management plan and to
immediately withdraw all aspects of Phase II. This will be scheduled for the next regular
meeting on April 2 and will include discussion of both the management and master plans. He
said it is apparent Council is opting for Option 2.
A 5 minute recess was taken.
The fifth item on the agenda was Vail Golf and Nordic Clubhouse Project Update. Ruther
introduced the item, stating the Council was being requested to make decisions on three
revisions to the plan based on input from the PEC: 1) A reduction in capacity of the banquet
room from 200 to 160 people; 2) A prohibition against parking on Sunburst Drive; and 3) A
requirement to implement a valet parking program to meet the parking needs of the club house
and to ensure no parking occurs on Sunburst Drive.
Tom Braun of Braun Associates and Dan Guimond of Economic and Planning Systems (EPS)
were then introduced to present their findings. Braun noted the Update would address the
renovation of the property and the banquet facility; would evaluate utilization from both a public
and private service provider’s view; would look at both costs and projected revenues; and would
look at the economic impact to the valley.
The evolution of the project has included an approach to re-zoning; expanded parking lot; tents;
parking lot entry; landscaping; noise and outdoor amplification of sound and use of outdoor
spaces; operations and management plan; bike lane signage along Sunburst Drive; and use of
the 18th green.
Guimond then presented the Vail Golf Club Banquet Room use Analysis. EPS looked at a
scope of work including existing Vail Golf course facilities and utilization; competitive facilities;
utilization forecasts; and economic impacts.
Major findings concluded the renovation would improve the golf course operations by having a
separate bar and grille and a dedicated banquet room that could capture up to 50 weddings per
year. The Clubhouse is a highly desired location and setting and most weddings would be
about 130 guests, with June to September weekend nights in peak season. This facility could
also attract limited corporate and community use, with perhaps corporate off-site dinners
totaling 5 and 15 community use events annually. He produced a valley wide market analysis
noting the valley hosts approximately 600 weddings a year, split between the Donovan Pavilion,
the Eagle Vail Pavilion and select resort hotels.
Tjossem noted that most weddings were held in the evening and would not compete with the
day time activities, e.g., golf and Nordic progress.
Major findings under the economic and financial analysis resulted in the Vail Golf Course
generating a net profit of $51,000 based on room rental only. By providing beverage service,
this could increase revenues to $130,000 annually. Total wedding spending would equal about
$5M a year; sales tax revenues would be in the $137,000 to $150,000 per year arena; and
lodging tax revenues are estimated at $124,000 to $137,000. Guimond noted these numbers
were achievable with professional marketing and as long as the space was made available.
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2013 Page 6
Dale Bugby, Vail property manager, reviewed language from the Pulis Ranch Deed Restriction
as it relates to the golf course: “To be used in perpetuity for a public golf course or open space
or park for benefit of the public and only such other related support facilities required for those
purposes. This covenant shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of Grantee and Grantor, their successors and assigns. He also expressed concern
about outdoor amplified music; no sharing of valet parking; and that there be no special event
patio or lawn events.
Attorney Chris Toll, who represents 8 homeowners on Sunburst Drive, was concerned with
operations policies that can change over time. He stated a design plan is needed.
Vail resident Kaye Ferry noted the banquet layout showed 168 seats, rather than the 160 called
for, as a revision.
Moffet moved, with a second from Kurz, to approve the 3 revisions as proposed. A vote was
taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The sixth item on the agenda was to appoint three members to the Art in Public Places (AIPP);
one member and two alternates to the Building and Fire Codes Appeal Boards (B&FCAB); two
members to the Design Review Board (DRB); and three members to the Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC).
Although there were three vacancies for the Art in Public Places Board, just one candidate,
Jennifer Mason, applied. She was unanimously approved for another two year term and the
remaining two vacancies will be re-advertised. Kathy Langenwalter was reappointed to the
Building and Fire Code Advisory Board, with Mark Donaldson and Mark Hallenbeck being
appointed as alternates for 5 year terms. Brian Gillette and Tom DuBois were reappointed to
the Design Review Board for another two year term each. And Michael Kurz, Luke Cartin and
Pamela Hopkins were reappointed to two year terms for the Planning and Environmental
Commission.
The seventh item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013
supplementing the 2013 budget. Mayor Daly read the title in full. Kathleen Halloran, Manager
of Budgets and Financial Reporting, stated there was nothing new, with the exception to some
increases to projects in the capital fund. Tjossem noted the second hour of the Vail’s 50th film
would fully document Vail’s first 50 years and recommended a general fund allocation of
$50,000 to Roger Cotton Brown to successfully complete this project.
Greg Hall, Public Works Director, stated the Bighorn Creek culvert was actually a joint project
with Eagle River Water and Sanitation District and would be a net zero cost to the town. It was
explained that the $40,000 laserfische upgrade would compliment the finance system. Stan
Zemler, Town Manager, noted the $630,000 Safeway parking upgrades project and contribution
from Vail Resorts, Inc., would have an answer by second reading of the ordinance. It was
clarified the sidewalk would be on the south side of the vehicles parallel to them. A question as
to whether parking meters could be installed was answered by Hall stating the Federal Highway
Administration was studying this request.
In response to funding an additional $190,000 for the Main Vail Fire Station EHU’s completion
was met with a request to have the Fire Department provide a further explanation at the second
4/2/2013
Town Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2013 Page 7
reading April 2. Another question arose about the RETT expense of diverting $360,000 formerly
to be used for bike paths to the stream walk behind Apollo Park and the Wren. Todd
Oppenheimer, project manager, explained this would lessen the grade from 17% to 6.3%, and
would consist of new construction, rebuilding more than half of the stream walk, placing boulder
walls and resurfacing. Oppenheimer was also asked to return to Council on April 2 with a more
thorough explanation of the work.
Judy Camp, Finance Director, clarified it had been normal practice to have an average of three
supplemental appropriation ordinances per year. Zemler noted the savings in overall operations
helped to fund special events from the general fund. Moffet moved to approve Ordinance 6 on
first reading, with a second from Donovan. A voted was taken and the motion passed
unanimously, 7-0.
The eighth item on the agenda was a request to table the first reading of Ordinance No. 21,
Series of 2012, an Ordinance for prescribed regulation amendments, pursuant to Section 12-3-
7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for amendments to Section 12-8B-7, Height, Vail Town
Code, to establish an allowable building height for golf course clubhouses within the outdoor
recreation district, and to allow for amendments to Section 12-2-2, Definitions, Vail Town Code,
to define the terms golf course and golf course clubhouse, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Mayor Daly read the title in full. Because the applicant was requesting a tabling to May 7,
Moffet moved, with a second from Donovan, to do so. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously, 7-0.
The ninth item on the agenda was a request to table the first reading of Ordinance No. 22,
Series of 2012, an ordinance for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-
7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of the Vail Golf Course parking lot from
the General Use District to the Outdoor Recreation District, located at 1775 Sunburst Drive/Lot
3, Sunburst Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Mayor Daly read the title in full. Again, because the applicant was requesting a tabling to May
7, Moffet moved, with a second from Donovan, to do so. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously, 7-0.
The tenth item on the agenda was Adjournment. There being no further business, Donovan
moved, with a second from Foley, to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. A vote was taken and the
motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
Respectfully Submitted,
Attest: __________________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
___________________________________
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
4/2/2013
Proclamation o. 2, Series of 2013
OFFICIAL PROCLAMATIO for Mayors Day of Recognition for ational Service, 2013
WHEREAS, service to others is a hallmark of the American character, and central to how we meet our
challenges; and
WHEREAS, the nation’s mayors are increasingly turning to national service and volunteerism as a
cost-effective strategy to meet city needs; and,
WHEREAS, national service expands economic opportunity by creating more sustainable, resilient
communities and providing education, career skills, and leadership abilities for those who serve; and
WHEREAS, national service participants serve in more than 70,000 locations across the country,
bolstering the civic, neighborhood, and faith-based organizations that are so vital to our economic and social
well-being; and
WHEREAS, national service participants increase the impact of the organizations they serve with,
both through their direct service and by recruiting and managing millions of additional volunteers; and,
WHEREAS, national service represents a unique public-private partnership that invests in community
solutions and leverages non-federal resources to strengthen community impact and increase the return on
taxpayer dollars; and,
WHEREAS, the Corporation for National and Community Service shares a priority with mayors
nationwide to engage citizens, improve lives, and strengthen communities; and is joining with mayors across
the country to support the Mayors Day of Recognition for National Service on April 9, 2013.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Andrew P. Daly, Mayor of the Town of Vail, do hereby
proclaim April 9, 2013, as National Service Recognition Day, and encourage residents to recognize the
positive impact of national service in our city, to thank those who serve and to find ways to give back to their
communities.
_______________________________
Attest: Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
_________________________
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
4/2/2013
Proclamation o. 3, Series of 2013
OFFICIAL PROCLAMATIO for Colorado Architecture Mon th, 2013
WHEREAS, we are shaped to great extent by our built environment—buildings, public
spaces, streetscapes, bridges—and the interaction with our natural environment; and
WHEREAS, an essential element of the Town of Vail character is the quality of its
architecture, urban design and civic realm created by architects of the past and the present; and
WHEREAS, The American Institute of Architects (AIA) Colorado Component and West
Chapter are dedicated to fostering design excellence by current architects and inspiring the next
generation of architects through events such as Colorado Architecture Month; and
WHEREAS, Colorado Architecture Month provides a series of free events that are open
to the public and are intended to celebrate the importance of architecture in people’s every day
lives. Architecture impacts how we live, work, play and even eat.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Andrew P. Daly, Mayor of the Town of Vail,
do hereby proclaim April 2013, as Colorado Architecture Month, and encourage residents to
recognize and support architecture and design in our community.
______________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
4/2/2013
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2013
ITEM/TOPIC: Town Manager Report:
1) Tree Removal discussion
4/2/2013
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2013
ITEM/TOPIC: A public hearing to discuss master planning for Gerald R. Ford Park.
PRESENTER(S): George Ruther
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Should Town staff prepare proposed amendments to
the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan to include the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the
2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendments, adopted by the Town Council on April 12,
2012 (i.e., Resolution No. 17, Series of 2012)?
BACKGROUND: The Vail Town Council is considering whether to propose amendments to
the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan which would include, all or some of, the recommendations
contained in the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan
Amendment. The planning documents for Ford Park are used in the development review
process to guide decision making for future development and improvements to the park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Town staff recommends the Town Council engages in a
public discussion regarding possible amendments to Ford Park. Following the public
discussion, staff recommends the Town Council determines whether to propose amendments
to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan. If it is determined that amendments are needed, staff
recommends the Town Council clearly articulates its expectations for the proposed
amendments.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ford Park Master Plan Memorandum
1985 Ford Park Master Map
2012 Management Plan Illustrative Plan
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
MEMORANDUM
To: Vail Town Council
From: George Ruther, Community Development Director
Date: April 2, 2013
Subject: Gerald R. Ford Park Master Plan Process
Purpose
There have been a number of questions circulating regarding the 1985 Gerald R. Ford
Park Master Plan, 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park
Management Plan Amendment. For instance,
• What is the policy direction provided in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan?
• What is the relationship between the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan, 1997 Ford
Park Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan?
• What is similar about the three planning documents and how do they differ?
• Did the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment alter the policy
direction provided in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan and 1997 Ford Park
Management Plan?
• Should the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan be amended to include, all or parts
of, the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendments. If so, which parts
should be included and how should the amendments be implemented in the
future?
The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to those questions in writing in hopes of
clarifying the issues. To help clarify the issues, this memorandum provides information
on the master planning history of Ford Park, a chronology of events and actions leading
up to recommendations of the 1985 Master Plan, 1997 Management Plan, and 2012
Management Plan Amendment and a recommended process by which to move this
discussion forward.
Gerald R. Ford Park Master Planning History
1985 Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan Park Master Plan
On August 6, 1985, the Vail Town Council adopted the Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan
Park Master Plan. Following a series of town meetings, meetings with special interest
groups, the school district, youth services, and the completion of adult and school
children surveys, three schematic designs were developed and presented. Ultimately
Scheme A was selected for adoption. Uses recommended by Scheme A include softball
fields, parking, a swimming pool complex, pedestrian paths, a nature trail, open turf
play/picnic areas, a nature center, an amphitheater, alpine garden area, historic buildings
and structures, a skating pond, and a snow dump.
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
According to the Plan,
“The master plan for Ford Park, along with this document, becomes the
guidelines upon which development will be based. In addition, the design
guidelines and maintenance recommendations presented in this report are the
beginning of those to be developed by the Town of Vail for use in planning, design
and management of future parks, open spaces and pedestrian/bikeway systems.”
With regard to the park development and landscape character, the Plan indicates the
following,
“During the implementation of the amphitheater and alpine garden elements, a
monitoring procedure should be developed by the Town which will provide for
some measure of control over the private groups responsible for the construction
of these facilities. These programs are needed to ensure that all development
within the park is in accordance with the Master Plan and related guidelines.”
And,
“Structures, shelters or other site buildings are designed in a low “profile” or
are set into slope areas to reduce their vertical dominance upon the site.”
In summary, the Plan states,
“Gerald R. Ford Park represents recreational master planning values which
respect the natural environment of the site. Proper development and management
provides in perpetuity for the recreational needs and enjoyment of citizens and
visitors for generations to come.”
The Gerald R. Ford Park/Donovan Park Master Plan remains in effect today. The Master
Plan has since been amended to include the Ford Park Management Plan, as amended in
2012.
1997 Ford Park Management Plan
On April 14, 1997, the Vail Town Council adopted the Ford Park Management Plan – an
amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan. Like all master planning documents, the
1997 Ford Park Management Plan is an element of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. As
such, it is a planning document to be used to articulate the Town’s expectations for
operations/development and to guide future decision making. When considering an
application for development in Ford Park, the final decision-makers (Town Council,
PEC, DRB) shall make a finding that the proposal is in compliance with the
recommendations of the Management Plan prior to granting an approval. If such a
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
finding can not be made, the application shall be modified to ensure compliance, or
denied.
The following section of this memorandum highlights applicable text and diagrams from
the Management Plan. These highlights are provided for informational purposes.
“The Ford Park Management Plan process was initiated in June of 1995 in
response to several development proposals which had been formally and
informally discussed and as a means to solve existing park management issues.
The development proposals included an Educational Center for the Betty Ford
Alpine Garden, cultural/performing arts center, expansion of the tennis facility,
athletic field fencing, and a community parking structure. Park management
issues included parking shortage, frontage road access, pedestrian access and
circulation, access for the elderly and disabled, utilization of the lower bench,
conflicts between uses within the park, conflicts with adjacent property owners,
and delineation of financial responsibilities. At the time the project was
authorized Council expressed concern that a new master plan for Ford Park
would result in an excessive amount of new development. In response, staff noted
the intention of the project was to create a management plan as a means to
adequately and consistently evaluate development proposals, thus limiting
development and protecting the character of the park.”
“The intention of the combined documents is to guide the outcome of future
development proposals within Ford Park by modifying the permitted uses (1973
acquisition legislation), recommending development guidelines, limiting the
number of leaseholders within Ford Park, and designating buffer/protection zones
within and adjacent to the park.”
“A proposal by the Alpine Garden Foundation to construct an educational center
within the final phase of the garden area was controversial. Opposition to the
expanded use of the garden and the interior of the park was a significant impetus
to the creation of the 1997 Management Plan. In response to that opposition, the
Vail Alpine Garden Foundation modified the proposal to locate the education
center near the athletic field parking lot on Vail Valley Drive. This location
received conceptual approval by the Council on October 15, 1996, however the
project was not implemented.”
“To that end, this Plan, serving as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master
Plan, was intended to guide the outcome of future development and improvement
proposals through the implementation of six major goals:
1. Preservation and protection
2. Reduction of vehicular intrusions
3. Reduction of conflicts between venues
4. Resolution of parking and Frontage Road access problems
5. Improvement of pedestrian circulation
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
6. Delineation of financial responsibilities”
“The Ford Park Management Plan will take precedence over the 1985 Master
Plan where conflicts or discrepancies occur.
2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment
The Ford Park Management Plan was adopted by the Vail Town Council in 1997. More
recently, however, the Management Plan was amended by the Town Council in April of
2012, resulting in the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment. The expressed
purpose of the amendment was “to reflect new ideas for improvements planned for the
Park. Plans to make improvements to the Park were initiated when Vail voters approved
funding by re-allocating a portion of Convention Center Funds to Ford Park.” Similar
to other master plans adopted by the Town, the Management Plan Amendment
establishes the overall policy objective for the use of Ford Park and provides
recommended strategies for implementation to ensure that the policy objective is
achieved.
According to the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan,
“The most recent motivation for initiating improvements to Ford Park evolved
from discussions of how to utilize the Town’s Conference Center funding. In the
Fall of 2011 Vail voters approved the re-allocation of the $9-plus million
Conference Center Funds by an 87 percent margin. As endorsed by the voters, a
portion of these funds was to provide funding for improvements to Ford Park,
specifically improvements to the Ford Amphitheater, the Alpine Gardens, park-
wide pedestrian flow, as well as expansion of the athletic fields and restroom
improvements at the Ford Park athletic complex.”
Additionally, Section 6: Illustrative Plan Components was amended to more specifically
reflect the intended improvements. According to Section 6, in part,
“The Ford Park Illustrative Plan provided herein replaces the site plans from the
1997 Ford Park Management plan. This new plan reflects many of the same
improvements contemplated by the 1997 Plan, but also includes a few
improvements not previously contemplated. Concepts depicted on the Illustrative
Plan are considered to be appropriate improvements and activities for the Park.
However, all improvements are subject to further review by the Town (conditional
use permit, development plan review, DRB review) prior to being implemented.”
The Plan further states,
“It should also be understood that the improvements being depicted on the
Illustrative Plan does not ensure if or when they will be implemented. In many
respects, the Illustrative Plan is a vision for how the may be developed and not a
commitment to any specific improvement.”
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
To support the images depicted on the Illustrative Plan narrative descriptions of specific
improvements are included in the Management Plan. Narrative descriptions are provided
in the Plan for improvements (e.g. Phase II) on the lower bench of Ford Park such as:
• Playground Restrooms (location)
• Ford Family Tribute (iconic arrival feature)
• Betty Ford Way (widening)
• Nature Trail (improvements)
• Social Courtyard (gracious, functional entry)
• Ticketing/Restrooms/Seating (remodel)
• BFAG Education Center (size, height, uses, location, tree preservation)
Chronology of Events and Actions
June 1995 Town begins Ford Park Management Plan process to address user
conflicts and “over development of the park”
October 1996 Council allows Vail Alpine Garden Foundation to proceed through
process with Educational Center at Soccer Field parking lot (not
implemented)
April 1997 Ford Park Management Plan adopted
1998 Fourth and Final Phase of Alpine Garden completed
1999 Lease with Vail Valley Foundation renewed
2008 Lease with Vail Recreation District renewed
2009 Vail Transportation Plan Update completed
November 2011 Voters approve use of Conference Center Funding for Ford Park
Improvements
April 2012 Planning and Environmental Commission forwards
recommendation of approval on Ford Park Management Plan
Amendments.
April 2012 Vail Town Council approves Resolution No. 17, Series of 2012,
adopting the amendments to the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan.
May 2012 Planning and Environmental Commission approves the conditional
use permit applications for the Phase I improvements.
September 2012 Construction of Phase I improvements begins.
January 2013 Vail Town Council grants owner’s consent to BFAG, VVF, and
VRD to submit development application for review (5-0)
January 2013 Conditional use permit application for Phase II improvements
submitted.
February 2013 Planning and Environmental Commission was introduced to the
Phase II requests at a public work session hearing.
March 2013 Final action on Phase II improvements is pending.
March 2013 Vail Town Council withdraws owner’s consent of development
applications.
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
Items for Discussion
What is the policy direction provided in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan?
Based upon the information contained in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan, the following
policy direction can be determined:
• Ford Park is intended to meet the recreational needs of the community.
• Care is to be taken to conserve and enhance natural areas.
• Active recreational elements are to be consolidated and located away from the
meadow and creek areas.
• The Park will be protected from over development.
• Locate high use facilities away from more passive uses.
• Stepping of structures into the existing topography.
• Parking areas adjacent to the Frontage Road and away from areas with children.
• Berms and landscape buffers to separate uses.
• The Master Plan provides the guidelines for which future development will be
evaluated.
What is the relationship between the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan, 1997 Ford Park
Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan?
The 1985 Master Plan is the original planning document created for the park. With few
exceptions, Ford Park has developed over time consistent with the Master Plan. The
1997 Ford Park Management Plan serves as an amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master
Plan. Originally intended to be a replacement to the 1985 Master Plan, the Management
Plan grew out of the input provided during the public process at the time and a desire to
address the existing conflicts between users and known deficiencies in the park. The
2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment was adopted as an amendment to the
Master Plan and Management Plan with the expressed purpose of allowing certain
improvements to occur within the park. According to both the 1997 and 2012 planning
documents,
“The Ford Park Management Plan will take precedence over the 1985
Master Plan where conflicts or discrepancies occur.”
The three plans, together, serve as the planning documents for Ford Park and are to be
used to guide future decisions for development within the park.
What is similar about the three planning documents and how do they differ?
Similarities
• Each of the three planning documents is intended to guide future development
decisions for Ford Park.
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
• Each maintains the current users within the park
• Each of the planning documents encourages low profile, appropriately sized
structures in the park.
• Each of the documents maintains a focus on recreation, protection, and
preservation of the park.
Differences
• The 1997 Management Plan relocated the Betty Ford Education Center to the
soccer field parking lot on Vail Valley Drive.
• The 1997 Management Plan focuses primarily on addressing conflicts between
the four stakeholders within the park.
• The 1985 Master Plan anticipated several potential uses which where never built
(i.e., skating pond and swimming complex)
• The 2012 Management Plan Amendment re-establishes the Betty Ford Education
Center within the interior of the park.
• The 2012 Management Plan Amendment updates the illustrative plan maps for
the park to include several expanded uses.
Did the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment alter the policy direction
provided in the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan and 1997 Ford Park Management
Plan?
Yes, the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan Amendment altered the policy direction of the
1985 and 1997 planning documents. For example, the 2012 Amendments re-established
the Betty Ford Alpine Garden Education Center within the interior of the park, down on
the lower bench, and recommended the widening of Betty Ford Way through the park to
accommodate larger vehicles.
Town Council Action
Should Town staff prepare proposed amendments to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan to
include the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan, and the 2012 Ford Park Management Plan
Amendments, adopted by the Town Council on April 12, 2012 (i.e., Resolution No. 17,
Series of 2012)? This would most likely be accomplished through the creation a new,
single planning document for Ford Park
If “yes”, then staff recommends the Vail Town Council instructs staff to immediately
begin preparing amendments to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan to include, all or parts of,
the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan and 2012 Ford Park Management Plan
Amendments. In order to do so efficiently, the Town Council must clearly articulate the
policy intent behind the amendments and state which elements of the 1997 Management
and 2012 Management Plan Amendments to include in the proposed amendments
application. For example, the Town Council, acting as the owner, needs to address the
following items:
4/2/2013
April 2, 2013 Town of Vail Community Development
• how are new buildings and structures to be addressed;
• upper bench or lower bench;
• what is the appropriate bulk, mass, scale of buildings;
• is year-round access permissible; noise impacts;
• are administrative office uses allowed;
• are there any uses which should be prohibited;
• what is the policy on impacts to existing landscaping;
• development areas vs. protection areas;
• when and where is vehicle access allowed;
• is additional parking needed;
• who is responsible for maintenance.
With this type of policy direction articulated, staff will return to the Vail Town Council
Meeting on Tuesday, April 16th with proposed master plan language and options for
future implementation. If deemed acceptable, the Vail Town Council, acting as the
owner of Ford Park, could then instruct staff to prepare a master plan amendment
application for review consistent with the Town’s adopted processes.
If “no”, then staff recommends the Vail Town Council repeals Resolution No. 17, Series
of 2012, as previously adopted, doing away with any and all recommendations for site
specific improvements (e.g. Phase II) within Ford Park. The practical effect of this
decision is that the park improvements remain “as is” and only Phase I improvements
will be completed. This action could be scheduled for a final decision at the evening
session of the Vail Town Council, on April 16, 2013.
4/2/2013
PLAY AREA
Sand Play Areas
Hard Surface Play Court
Restrooms
Picnic Tables & Grills
Drinking Fountains
Play Structures
PICNIC AREA -
Group Picnic
Picnic Shelter
Picnic Tables & Grills
Drinking Fountains
Existing Structures
SKATING PONDS
Warming Hut /Restroorns,
Observation Deck
Water Feature For Aeration
Bridge
SWIMMING POOL COMPLEX
Drop Off
Service
Employee Parking 7 Cars
Sun Decks
Pedestrian Access To Lower Bench
Passive Solar Orientation
am
ins
1
W,
SWIMMING POOL COMPLEX
Drop Off
Service
Employee Parking 7 Cars
Sun Decks
Pedestrian Access To Lower Bench
Passive Solar Orientation
am
V"
Bik /Ski TraiQ
3
Nature ar
ve Center
L
GE
RALD
R.
MASTER PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
550 Vo
50 scale
6
Town of VaVil
office of community
development
BASTE R PLAN THK associates,
inc.
AugustS.1985
ins
1
V"
Bik /Ski TraiQ
3
Nature ar
ve Center
L
GE
RALD R.
MASTER PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
550
Vo
50 scale
6
Town of
VaVil
office of community
developmentBASTERPLAN
THK
associates,
inc.
AugustS.1985
4/2/2013
4/2/2013
We are delivering this message on behalf of susan@colorado.net
To Members of the Vail Town Council, Attached is a visual presentation on the Betty Ford
Alpine Gardens Education that I put together for use in my fundraising efforts, I thought
you all might find a couple of the images helpful, particularly the ones representing
concepts we like for the main education/interpretive room and the Alpine Cold House.
Susan Milhoan
View Copy of Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education Center by Susan Milhoan on Prezi.com
by clicking the link below:
http://prezi.com/yvaklfil9otn/copy-of-betty-ford-alpine-gardens-education-center/
Happy zooming!
Prezi team
From: Lorraine Higbie [mailto:l.higbie@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 12:05 PM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Fwd: Betty Ford gardens
Begin forwarded message:
From: Lorraine Higbie <l.higbie@comcast.net>
Subject: Betty Ford gardens
Date: April 1, 2013 10:03:27 AM MDT
To: Harley higbie <hhigbie@qwestoffice.net>
I have been a supporter and early volunteer at the Vail Alpine Gardens since its
inception and watched it grow into a first class botanical garden which was the dream of its
founder Helen Fritch. Alpine flowers usually grow their best at higher altitudes, but because the
special attention these specimens have received from volunteers and professional gardeners we
have been able to grow exceptional alpines in the gardens.
These gems are covered in snow for five months of the year so to have a
herbarium, a library, a nd a space to display alpine specimens would be a great addition to the
gardens.
We have watched Vail grow from a winter sports resort to a resort where people
come of enjoy many different activities. A building at the gardens that would hold
educational classes and botanical displays would add another attraction to our town.
Lorraine Higbie
From: Gwen Scalpello [mailto:gscalpello@attglobal.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 10:49 PM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Ford Park Master Plan
Dear Town Council members:
As I am unable to attend Tuesday’s meeting, I wish to submit comments regarding the master
plan.
Ford Park was never intended to be only open space. I encourage you to adapt the Ford Park
Master Plan/Management Plan to the changing needs of our community, guests and stakeholders
in the Park and allow structures and uses that enhance the resident and guest experience year -
round as we have done in building the very successful Donovan Pavilion in Donovan Park. My
arguments are as follows:
1 –Ford Park was acquired not to preserve undeveloped open space but to provide recreational ,
educational and cultural amenities to our residents and our gue sts.
“ provide the municipal facilities referred to herein as well as to preserve for the
inhabitants of the Town cultural, educational and recreational facilities such as theaters,
civic centers, parks, swimming pools, ski lifts, tennis courts, and other facilities of
similar character and purpose. “
Ordinance 6, Series of 1973
The 1985 Master Plan added an alpine garden to its intended uses. An education center for the
Alpine Garden was later added (Item 7a). The ice rink was replaced by a skating pond to
promote year-round access. Now opponents to the recent amendment decry the possibility of
year round usage, wishing it to remain undisturbed in winter.
2 - The 1985 Master Plan clearly defines that Ford Park consists of impr oved and undeveloped
natural spaces.
“A careful blend of maintained active recreational areas and natural passive areas has
been achieved to accommodate the diverse pleasures and interests of this mountain
community. . . Open meadows of native grasses and flowers, and prominent stands of
evergreen forest are maintained in undeveloped areas of the park. In the spirit of the
Vail Nature Centre located in Ford Park, these natural areas of meadow, woodland and
sloping terrain with exposed rock, provide for the wildlife and their habitats and should
remain unchanged for all to enjoy.”
3 - The 1997 Management Plan limits but does not preclude future development changes to Ford
Park.
Goal #1 Preserve and Protect Ford Park
“1.1: Limit future development.
Action Step 1.1.1: Draft a new ordinance to exclude those uses listed in Ordinance No.6,
Series of 1973, now considered to be inappropriate, and to redefine the allowable uses
within Ford Park.”
Some uses were excised; new uses, including “Administrative offices” were permitted. I am told
administrative offices were included only to acknowledge the offices that already existed, not to
allow new ones. The argument of “intent at the time” should not be necessary when evaluating
new proposals against a master plan. If necessary, qualifiers such as "directly related to the
applicant's operations in Ford Park" could be added.
The 1997 plan also documents the controversy over the request of the Alpine Gardens to build an
education center and the Gardens’ subsequent withdrawal of its application to be in the core of
Ford Park. It does not preclude a future application by the Gardens, nor does it preclude future
buildings in the Park.
Sincerely,
Gwen Scalpello
From: Robert Fritch [mailto:hfritch@msn.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 10:08 AM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Vail Town Council
Vail Town Council
As suggested in the town of Vail News Release of March 29 concerning the discussion of the
Ford Park Master Plan the Council on April 2, I would like to comment on it.
It is my understanding that the decision that needs to be made is to whether or not the Master
Plan for the Park should more clearly spell out what additional buildings would be acceptable in
the park. It is my feeling that some additional buildings should be acceptable, as shown on the
Management Plan. Buildings should only be allowed when they enhance the activities currently
taking p lace in the Park and this restriction should be part of the Master Plan. The proposed
Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education Center building would be a great asset to the community
and visitors.
The withdrawal of the agreement you gave to The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens to proceed through
the process of gaining approval from the PEC and Design Review Board has put the Betty Ford
Alpine Gardens in an untenable situation. They have proceeded with the design of the building
and have a contract with someone to raise the funds for the project. In starting fundraising, they
have contacted organizations who have shown great enthusiasm in giving financially supporting
the program. They are now in the awkward position of not being able to further pursue either
those people or others until we can get approval from the Council to proceed with the building.
The clock is still ticking on expenses set in motion when you gave approval and now momentum
is being lost. The Garden is willing to discuss alternate locations of the bu ilding that might be
more acceptable to the Council.
I urge the Council to quickly find a way to allow the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education
Center to proceed without further delay. The Education Center would enhance the current
activities taking place in the park. It is important to find a way as quickly as possible for the
Garden to take advantage of what was set in motion when you first gave approval for the
building.
Bob Fritch March 30, 2013
From: Anne Esson [mailto:alesson05@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 3:55 PM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Ford Park Redevelopment
Ladies & gentlemen:
April 2 nd I hope to be at Town Council’s meeting for discussion of Ford Park situation. I
continue to feel strongly that TOV regulations for open space designation prohibit development
on these properties except for parks, general open space and recreation and not for worthy
purposes as supporting deserving non-profits, affordable housing, and helping such non-profits
raise revenues by developing commercial venues. As a long -time advocate for our watershed’s
health, I am also aghast that a two -story 3000sqft building would be constructed on the already
troubled r iparian area of Gore Creek.
I read in the Town’s public release after the Mar. 19 th meeting that Phase I which in general we
the public approved in a ballot measure would continue. This is not unreasonable. However,
Friday in driving by Ford Park I thought I could see that much more is underway on the west
plaza of the Amphitheater including removal of the garden & statue & emplacement of tall
girders or equipment. I plan to walk closer Monday or Tuesday & see this from a better vantage
point. This is NOT what we thought was agreed to. Please tell me it ain’t so! And on top of this
plans at the golf course for the public area seem out of control & a source of enragement for
nearby homeowners & the public I encounter daily. What ever has gotten into our u sually
reasonable Council?
Anne Esson
From: Awkosloff@aol.com [mailto:Awkosloff@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 1:12 PM
To: Council Dist List
Cc: Stan Zemler; jpalermo@bravovail.org
Subject: Ford Park
Good Morning,
there is some very important issues to be reconsidered for Phase II of this project but
my comments refer to Phase I currently under construction. as the immediate past
chair of Bravo my concern is finishing Phase I in time for the opening night June 28,
2013. we are selling tickets and receiving donations and any delay in the season would
be a disaster.
the economic impact of Bravo! is significant and delay in performance would put the
entire season in jeopardy. I know you all share this concern as well.
thanks for your consideration and the work you do.
Sincerely,
Alan Kosloff
From: Kirk Senske [mailto:ksenske@earthlink.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 9:37 AM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Consideration of Betty Ford Alpine Garden's education Building
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am a resident of Eagle-Vail from May through October and I have
volunteered at BFAG since my arrival in the Valley in 1999, first as a
weeder, pruner and cleaner-upper extraordinaire and now as a docent.
This garden has become a special place in my heart. I have met so many
wonderful people, all of whom are truly dedicated to the preservation and
enhancement of the garden. This garden draws people from all over the
country and the world and they acknowledge that they are experiencing a
rare treat. And they are spending their dollars in Vail. How many people
do you know who have brought visitors to the Garden for a visit. Many,
many.
I endorse the present plans of the garden for further improvement of the
Garden with the education building. The valley will truly benefit from this
addition. Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Kirk Senske (Mrs.)
325 A Greenway Circle
Avon, CO 81620
-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Narduzzi [mailto:1froglady@centurytel.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 9:06 AM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Betty Ford Educational Center
Dear Town Council Members,
I am urging you to support the proposed education center at the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. The
gardens are already a unique contribution to both our locals and all our visitors, but to add the
additional aspects of a horticultural library, herbarium, and educational programming would truly make
these gardens a unique and exceptional venue. To be a ble to have people see these remarkable gardens
as well as to take home knowledge that will keep their visit alive- would truly create and add to a
memorable experience of Vail.
I thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter.
Susan Narduzzi
From: ROB BEUTTAS [mailto:rcbeuttas@msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 7:52 AM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Betty Ford Park
> We will not be able to attend the meeting on April 2 regarding the Educational Center for the
Ford Park's Master Plan but wanted you to know what Ford Park means to those NOT living in
the Vail area. My husband and I have summered in Vail for the past 30 years in Golden Peak.
Every day we are in Ford Park and have met so many wonderful people from all over the world
that tell us what a wonderful hidden gem Ford Park is. By adding an Educational Center - you
will not only benefit the Park but also provide another amenity for your Vail guests to enjoy.
Please consider the addition of an Education Center.
>
> Rob and Cheryl Beuttas
> Dallas, Texas
From: Nicola Ripley [mailto:nicola@bettyfordalpinegardens.org]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 8:16 PM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Fwd: BFG Letter
I will be out of town next week. I sent this letter to the info at BFG, but thought I would send it
directly to you so that you can forward on to the appropriate people. I wish you luck, this is such
a crazy decision!!
--
Sandy Collier
sancollier@gmail.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Margaret Rogers
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 5:51 PM
To: Andrew P.Daly; Council Dist List; Stan Zemler; George Ruther
Subject: RE: Ford Park Master Plan
By now I'm sure everyone has reviewed the 1985, 1997 and 2012 documents. You will have noticed that
the first sentence of the 1997 plan states: "The Ford Park Management Plan herein presented is to serve
as an amendment to the 1985 Master Plan for Gerald R. Ford Park." Section 4: Purpose of the
Management Plan states ". . . The Ford Park Management Plan will take precedence over the 1985
Master Plan where conflicts and discrepancies occur." The 2012 plan retains the language of Section 4.
The 2012 update to the 1997 plan is a document that merges the 1997 plan with the changes adopted in
2012. Every word of the 1997 plan is contained in the 2012 document. The 2012 amendments are
placed in the appropriate sections of the 1997 plan; section 6 of the 1997 plan has been deleted and a
new section 6 added. So we have two documents to work with, 1985 and 2012.
I can understand the argument that because we were amending the 1997 "management" plan in 2012,
rather than the 1985 "master plan", the public may not have understood the import of the amendment.
I certainly don't expect that they would have focused on the first sentence of the 1997 plan stating that
it amends the master plan. Therefore, I have no objection to reviewing the plans and giv ing the public
the opportunity to give input and naming the resulting document an amendment to the 1985 master
plan.
Logically, however, I believe we should start with the 2012 plan since that is the one in effect, and it
addresses the issues presented today. I don't think we need to spend time discussing a swimming pool,
which is anticipated in the 1985 plan but which has subsequently been rejected. We also don't need to
address skating ponds or other uses in the 1985 master plan that are not being considered now. We
should focus on the issues raised by the current proposed changes to Ford Park.
Margaret
______________________________________
From: Andrew P.Daly [skidaly100@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 12:35 PM
To: Council Dist List; Stan Zemler; George Ruther
Subject: Ford Park Master Plan
All,
I have had the opportunity to discuss with each council member how they would like to proceed
with the review of the Ford Park Master Plan and the 1997 and 2012 Management plan updates and the
review of the projects that are proposed in the 2012 Management Illustrative Plan.
Almost unanimously. council members want to initiate the process by reviewing the the 1985
Master Plan then layering on it the 1997 Management Plan and finally, adding appropriate features of
the 2012 plan such that at completion, we end up with a 1985 plan with numerous amendments
including the management plans all combined in one document. They also want to ensure adequate
public input for the review process given the 2012 plan was principally engineered by the current
stakeholders. Except for one council member, all others agreed that there should be no consideration
of the Phase II projects as presented in the 2012 Illustrative Plan until the Council has completed their
review of the earlier documents and completed a list of proposed amendments that would then be
taken to the PEC for review. The concern of one council member was during the council deliberations
and public comment period that the Betty Ford Gardens Education building would be characterized as
an office building to the determine of the project. I believe that this is unlikely since we would not be
taking feedback on individual projects until after we had completed this review and amendment of the
MasterPlan process, which likely not occur until our second or third meeting on Ford Park, and if
someone did attempt to insert such a characterization, Stan and I will be quick to intervene.
In reviewing the areas that Council members would like to see discussed, and or addressed, in the
process , I have compiled the following initial list, in no particular order, as other points of discussion
are sure to come up during our deliberations.
A. Structures in Ford Park
1. Guidelines for modification of existing structures and hard surface areas in the Park. general
concern by some that the park is becoming urbanized.
2. New structures in the park and, if so,
a. location- lower bench and or upper bench
b. size guidelines
3. Guidelines for uses of structures -concerns for potential commercialization of structures for
retail, rental, weddings etc.
4. Ownership of structures. Town should own or lease structures in the park and should have
reversions clauses that give structure back to town at end of lease or in the case to meet lease
operational standards.
B. Temporary Structures-
1. appropriate locations for temporary structures
2. guidelines on size and frequency of use of temporary structures.
C. Riparian Areas
1. General concern for protection of riparian areas by avoiding structures and intensive use
2. Need for formal access point(s) in Ford Park to Gore Creek so as to take pressure of stream areas
in general D. Administrative Functions in the park.
1. should administrative functions be allowed in the park? If so, should the size of the
administrative areas be limited to a certain % of the overall space in the park by any particular
stakeholder?
2. Need to define/differentiate between office functions and support functions for on going
activities taking place in the park e.g. ticket sales
3. Management of impacts of administrative space e.g. Fedx and UPS deliveries.
F. Vehicular Traffic-
1. More definitive guidelines on limiting vehicular traffic in park particularly during peak use
periods.
2. Limiting activities that result in higher vehicular traffic.
G Seasonal vs Year Round use
1. Guidelines needed that define use expectations for seasonal, temporary and year round uses, if
any.
H. Noise
1. Noise continues to be an issue in the park both from the playing fields and the highway. The
Master Plan should consider including plans for mitigation in 2012 Phases I and II.
I. Parking
1. Maintain flexibility in the Master Plan for parking options
2. Keep possibility in the Plan for underground parking on upper portions of the Park.
J. Endowment
1. Should new structures in the Park be required to carry an endowment to ensure the long term
care and maintenance of the structures?
-----Original Message-----
From: Gretchen Busse [mailto:gretchengb@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:17 AM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Betty Ford Gardens
Good Day Council,
Across the bridge by the BFG, walking down a few yards on an enchanting path along the creek is the
Vail Nature Center with a charming house and outdoor educational area.
Couldn't this facility make an educational garden center for the Betty Ford-Garden visitors and children
alike?
Why duplicate what is already available?
Thank you, Gretchen Busse
Sent from my iPad
From: JOHN & DIANA DONOVAN [mailto:dianamdonovan@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:27 AM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Ford Park and plans
I always try to mention everything but I will keep this simple.
There needs to be one master plan and one management plan, guiding daily decisions, in the
back of the master plan.
The Master Plan needs to reflect the “as built” following Phase 1 and any approved
components of Phase 2.
The BFAG Bldg must be on the upper bench or soccer field parking lot with a parking structure
built by the town (if feasible)
No new bldgs/structures below the “edge” of the upper bench and no winter uses in this area.
10% (number in BFAG letter) administrative/office space per use in Ford Park.
Protect & preserve historical bldgs (I compiled a history of the bldgs a few years ago)
Restore riparian areas and have only “protected” access points.
Temp uses and special events need a great deal of study due to the negative impacts on the
Commons in particular and the loss of the lower bench for use by the public when it is most
needed.
I would be happy to serve on a committee to finalize “plans”. I helped on the Master Plan and
97 Management Plan. Plans like this require an educational component in order to be
successful. Pretty pictures are not representative and not appropriate to Master Plans.
From: Elizabeth Paxson [mailto:lizpaxson@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:46 PM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: FW: Ford Park
Dear Town Council Members,
Since the agenda tonight only speaks to the Master Plan question and not individual projects, I
want to pass along some information that you may not be aware of.
After listening to concerns of council and members of the community, we set out to find a mor e
acceptable location for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Education and Visitor Center. We found
an excellent location next to our tool shed, on the upper bench, tucked into the trees at the
entrance to the gardens.
see attachment
We can work with either the upper bench or lower bench, whichever you think most appropriate.
Since the accusation of "office building" has been put out repeatedly by opponents of the
project, it is important to reiterate that the office space will be less than 10% of the
building. This education/visitor center will benefit the local community and visitors with
horticultural dislays, classes, and space for garden related meetings. Our alpine greenhouse will
enable year round cultivation of alpine plants which will be fully acc essible to the public. The
herbarium (pressed plant collection) will be open to the public and visiting researchers. The
education and visitor center will be fully accessible and open to the public, with the only
exception of the Director's office.
Please include our Education and Visitors Center in whichever Master or Management
Plan you adopt.
Liz Paxson
President, Board of Trustees
Betty Ford Alpine Gardens
From: JOHN & DIANA DONOVAN [mailto:dianamdonovan@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:22 PM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: letter errors
2 weeks ago I made specific reference to changes from 1997 to 2012. In reviewing the red lined
document today I find that my document does not match the red lined one. Don’t know how
that happened as my document was supposed to be the final that only needed council
approval. I do not like to present misinformation. I do believe that my comments still
represented the “intent”.
The red lined version clearly states on page 12 that ...the 2012 Update suggests few significant
changes to the overall level of development and activities that take place in the Park.” That
concept is repeated over and over. The problem is that it is absolutely false.
The 2012 Plan seems to deliberately mislead the casual reader.
Page 2 last paragraph...One clear, concise message was conveyed to the town staff from the
public participants: Our role is steward to the park; don’t screw it up by over
development. That is still the message from the public that is not attached to a particular
special interest. The input from past mayors and council members two weeks ago is proof of
that.
If we work together for the good of the park as a whole we can accommodate all of the existing
needs. It is the wants that spoil the park for others.
From: Mike Charles [mailto:mcharles1@mcpsvail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 5:24 PM
To: Council Dist List
Cc: Liz Paxson (lizpaxson@comcast.net); Nicola (nicola@bettyfordalpinegardens.org); June Vanourek
(junevan@vail.net); gscalpello@attglobal.net; Susan Ford Bales (sfbales@aol.com); Sharon Sweeney
(cogambler@mac.com); Sheika Gramshammer (sheika@pepis.com)
Subject: FW: Ford Park - Vail Town Council 4-2-13
I am unable to attend tonight’s meeting. This is my sincere message regarding the Ford Park
issue.
Michael Charles
From: Mike Charles
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 5:12 PM
To: Nicola (nicola@bettyfordalpinegardens.org)
Cc: Mike Charles (mcharles1@mcpsvail.com)
Subject: Ford Park - Vail Town Council 4-2-13
To All Council Members
Regarding the question before the council “Should the Council direct the Staff to prepare and
amendment to the 1985 Ford Park Master Plan?” I would suggest that the intent of the present
plan is consistent with the responsible planned uses for the Ford Park Property. The Ford Park
was designated for recreational uses primarily. The facilities that have been developed to this
date have been to support the recreational, entertainment, educational, and athletic programs as
desired by the entire community of the Vail Valley, and not just he Vail Village Community.
Vail, as a whole, is a resort community that provides recreation and entertainment to the local
resident community, the resident community of the Vail Valley to the west as far as Gypsum, to
east as far as Summit County, and more importantly to the visiting and absentee second home
owners. The total community this Vail Valley and a ll of its constituents serves is well into the
millions on an annual basis. We must remember our primary product is entertainment and
recreation. The basis of Vail’s success has been to progress with time. To put it more simply Vail
is in Show Business. The Show has always gotten better each year for 50 years. Vail Resorts has
progressed the mountain experience to levels that are unmatched within the industry. The
lodging and restaurant sectors have as well progressed. The Ford Park is progressing as well.
The perception that these modest improvements, that support the already existing Ford Park
facilities, will harm the quality of the park is quite simply wrong. I suggest a review of an
alternate location for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens educational facility will prove to allow the
planning and construction process to move forward further improving the Show we produce for
the millions who attend, enjoy, and support The Vail Valley and all of its wonderful activities.
Michael Charles
Vail Resident - 37 years
BFAG Vice President
President
Maximum Comfort Pool & Spa Inc
Phone: 970-949-6339
Cell: 970-904-4000
From: Ken Maloney / Barbara Palermo [mailto:mal.pal@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:54 AM
To: Council Dist List
Subject: Alpine Garden Education Center
Hello,
My name is Barbara Palermo and I have been a resident of Vail for the past five years. During
those five years I have been a dedicated volunteer at the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens - most often
in the Schoolhouse Museum / gift Shop.
People from all over the United States and from many countries in the world visit Vail's garden
in the summer - all are impressed that we have here at 8,100 feet the highest elevation official
public botanical garden in the world. They visit the Museum / gift shop and ask us where the
visitor interpretive center is. Sadly we have to say we don't have one.
I firmly believe that a small, tastefully designed, informatively staffed , educational building
would enhance the visitor's experience and bring our " little garden " to the standard that is
expected of the " highest public botanical garden in the world ". Being labelled as such is quite
an honor - and Vail , being a world class resort, should endeavor to be the best it can be in all
aspects of public presentation.
Thank you for reading this. I hope my comments will be considered positively.
Regards,
Barbara Palermo
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2013
ITEM/TOPIC: Appoint one member to the Vail Local Marketing District Advisory Committee
(VLMDAC).
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Council interviewed all interested parties at the
work session and Council should appoint one member to the VLMDAC for one eight month
term, April 2, 2013 - December 31, 2013.
BACKGROUND: The Town received four letters of interest for the open position on the
VLMDAC as follows: Michael Holton; Sonny Kerstiens; Liana Carlson Moore; Jeff Morgan;
Patrica McNamara
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Council interview each applicant at the
work session and appoint one member to the VLMDAC at the evening meeting.
4/2/2013
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2013
ITEM/TOPIC: 2012 Year-end Investment Report
PRESENTER(S): Judy Camp
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: No formal action requested - informational only
BACKGROUND: Section 2-2-8 of the Town Code requires an annual presentation of the
town's investment report, which is also provided as a written report each quarter. This agenda
item is a presentation of the town's investment report as of December 31, 2012.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Investment report
Invest power pt
4/2/2013
TOWN OF VAIL MEMORANDUM
TO:Stan Zemler
Council Members
FROM: Kathleen Halloran
DATE:4th Qrtr 2012
RE:Investment Report
Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of December 31, 2012.
The estimated average yield for the pooled cash fund is 0.79%. As of
12/31/12, the Treasury yield curves for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year are 0.05%, 0.11%,
and 0.16% respectively. TOV investments performed above these yields.
Our investment mix follows the policy objectives of safety, liquidity, and yield in that order.
During the 4th quarter of 2012, the balance in the Colorado Investment Pool was reduced
by $10.8 million primarily to pay for capital projects, such as Main Vail Fire Station, Library Remodel,
CDOT required parking, Matterhorn bridge, Lionshead portals, Ford Park fields and the Ford Amphitheatre.
There were no other changes to investment products or banking institutions.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Gov't
Securities
$17.8M, 28%
CD's $13.7M,
21%
Colorado
Investment
Pool 22.6M,
35%
Cash
$10.4M, 16%
2012 Investment Mix
$64.5 million
4/2/2013
Town of Vail, Colorado
Investment Report
Summary of Accounts and Investments
As of 12/31/12
2012
Balances Percentage
Cash of Total
Commercial Banks$9,538,05314.78%
Money Market Funds$863,3411.34%
Total Cash$10,401,39416.12%
U.S. Government Securities (see page 4)
Government Agency Seurities -Piper Jaffray$11,669,50618.09%
FNMA'S, GNMA'S, FHLMC'S & SBA'S - Dana$6,118,6459.48%
Total Government Securities$17,788,15127.57%
Certificates of Deposit$13,743,52521.30%
Colorado Investment Pools$22,586,20735.01%
Total Portfolio$64,519,276100.0%
Maturing Within 12 Months35,893,499 55.63%
Maturing Within 24 Months$4,790,1217.42%
Maturing After 24 Months$23,835,65736.94%
64,519,276 100.0%
Investments 123120122 4/2/2013
InstitutionAverageBalances
Type of AccountsReturn12/31/12
"CASH" ACCOUNTS
Commercial Bank Accounts:
First Bank of Vail - Operating
Interest 0.200%$9,538,053
Money Market Accounts:
Schwab Institutional Money Market Fund - Dana Investments
Interest and Balance0.010%$325,196
Vail Super Now Public Funds Account - Piper Jaffray
Interest and Balance0.000%$538,144
Total Money Market Funds$863,341
Total "Cash" Accounts $10,401,394
GOVERNMENT SECURITIES (see pg 5)
Government Agency Seurities -Piper Jaffray1.17%11,669,506$
FNMA'S, GNMA'S, FHLMC'S & SBA'S - Dana1.93%6,118,645$
17,788,151$
Total Government Securities 17,788,151$
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#5734) Matures September 14, 20171.200%1,003,602
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#3782) Matures Nov 17, 20141.500%1,024,528
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#5114) Matures March 27, 20171.300%1,038,563
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#4983) Matures March 6, 20171.300%1,010,783
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#1992) Matures Nov 23, 20152.000%1,055,639
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#3421) Matures Mar 17, 20162.500%1,045,443
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#4290) Matures Sept 29, 20161.750%1,022,154
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#4754) Matures Dec 28, 20161.750%1,017,791
1st Bank, Vail Colorado (#5319) Matures May 19, 20140.600%1,505,663
Discover Bank Greenwood (#2546) Matures March 14, 20171.450%101,594
Ally Bank Midvale Utah (#2005) Matures March 28, 20161.200%100,672
Goldman Sachs Bank (#3814) Matures Feb 8, 20171.700%102,267
Piper Jaffray 795450PJ8 Matures Sept 19, 20171.590%100,383
GE Money Bank (#3616) Matures Apr 20, 20151.050%100,248
Alpine Bank, Vail Colorado (#35144) Matures Mar 28, 20131.440%1,040,476
Alpine Bank, Vail Colorado (#83597) Matures Sept 11, 20140.459%661,763
Alpine Bank, Vail Colorado (#15894) Matures Oct 16, 20134.400%698,631
Alpine Bank, Vail Colorado (#43763) Matures Nov 13, 20143.440%1,113,325
13,743,525
Total Certificates of Deposit 13,743,525$
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS
Colotrust General Fund
Interest0.040%$22,586,207
Total Local Government Investment Pools Accounts $22,586,207
Total All Accounts $64,519,276
Performance Summary
as of 12/31/12
Investments 123120123 4/2/2013
Days/Years
Int RatePurchaseMaturityto MaturityMarket
AgencyBrokerCouponYieldDateDateat PurchaseValue
***Federal Agency Discount Notes & Bonds***
FHLB 31339YJU7Piper Jaffray5.000%4.870%7/12/20107/23/20133.0$102,682
FNMA 3136FR2G7Piper Jaffray1.450%1.440%8/29/20119/20/20165.1$529,436
FNMA 3136FR3Q4Piper Jaffray1.320%1.320%9/14/20119/28/20165.0$501,435
FNMA 3136FTEK1Piper Jaffray1.500%1.480%10/24/201110/28/20165.0$1,010,220
FNMA 3136G0FA4Piper Jaffray1.125%1.120%5/16/201211/16/20164.5$501,720
FHLB 3134G3BROPiper Jaffray1.500%1.490%11/30/201112/14/20165.0$955,007
FNMA 3136FRWY5Piper Jaffray2.050%2.030%7/6/201112/27/20165.5$100,809
FHLM 3134G3GN4Piper Jaffray1.500%1.500%1/18/20121/18/20175.0$400,244
FNMA 3136G0ER8Piper Jaffray1.150%1.140%1/18/20125/9/20175.3$808,464
FFCB 3133EAF86Piper Jaffray0.970%0.970%1/19/20128/7/20175.6$1,003,040
FFCB 3133EAK49Piper Jaffray0.980%0.980%1/20/20128/15/20175.6$501,850
FNMA 3135G0NR0Piper Jaffray1.100%1.100%1/21/20128/28/20175.6$502,075
FNMA 3136G0ZG9Piper Jaffray1.150%1.140%1/22/20128/28/20175.6$502,540
FHLM 3134G3J43Piper Jaffray1.040%1.040%1/23/20129/27/20175.7$401,172
FNMA 3135G0PH0Piper Jaffray1.000%1.000%1/24/20129/27/20175.7$500,780
FNMA 3135GOPL1Piper Jaffray1.050%1.050%1/25/201210/4/20175.7$501,980
FHLB 3133813R4Piper Jaffray1.000%1.000%1/26/201211/9/20175.8$501,070
FHLB 3133814L6Piper Jaffray1.050%1.050%1/27/201211/15/20175.8$500,560
FFCB 3133EC5A8Piper Jaffray0.870%0.870%1/28/201211/27/20175.8$498,680
FFCB 3133EC7V4Piper Jaffray0.840%0.840%1/29/201212/13/20175.9$597,282
FNMA 3136G13C1Piper Jaffray0.750%0.750%1/30/201212/19/20175.9$499,230
FNMA 3136G16W4Piper Jaffray0.650%0.650%1/31/201212/27/20175.9$249,230
Average Yield1.17%$11,669,506
Days/Years
Interest RatePurchaseMaturityto MaturityMarket
AgencyBrokerCouponYieldDateDateat PurchaseValue
***FNMA'S, ARM'S & SBA'S***
SBA 502647V-QPooled - Dana3.975%3.9%1-Jul-9425-Jun-1925.0$6,658
SBA 508940Pooled - Dana2.575%2.4%6-May-1125-Jun-3019.2$345,018
SBA 508946Pooled - Dana2.250%2.1%1-Jan-1225-Jul-3018.6$325,110
SBA 505536V-MPooled - Dana3.125%2.9%1-Aug-0125-Jun-2624.9$22,428
GNMA 8417Pooled - Dana5.125%3.8%1-Oct-8820-Oct-1830.1$1,728
GNMA 8703Pooled - Dana4.750%1.7%1-Sep-9520-Sep-2530.1$870
GNMA 8720Pooled - Dana5.125%1.6%30-Sep-9520-Oct-2530.1$907
GNMA 8788Pooled - Dana5.375%1.6%1-Jan-9620-Jan-2630.1$718
GNMA 80426Pooled - Dana4.500%1.7%21-Jul-0020-Jul-3030.0$7,071
GNMA 80696Pooled - Dana3.375%1.7%23-May-1120-May-3322.0$324,003
GNMA 80710Pooled - Dana5.625%1.6%1-Jul-0320-Jul-3330.1$7,209
GNMA 82759Pooled - Dana2.500%2.4%20-Mar-1220-Mar-4129.0$464,158
GNMA 80593Pooled - Dana1.750%1.7%20-Apr-1220-Apr-3220.0$3,720
FNMA 850125Pooled - Dana5.146%2.5%1-May-091-Sep-3526.4$55,771
FNMA 422251Pooled - Dana5.589%2.2%1-Dec-951-Jan-2125.1$20,159
FNMA 334439Pooled - Dana6.200%2.3%1-Dec-951-Apr-2428.4$4,448
FNMA 520790Pooled - Dana6.077%2.3%1-Jun-001-Apr-2827.9$5,728
FNMA 546468Pooled - Dana5.563%2.2%24-May-001-Jun-2828.0$3,117
FNMA 535326Pooled - Dana5.263%2.1%26-Jun-001-Jun-2828.0$3,672
FNMA 323798Pooled - Dana5.749%2.1%1-Dec-991-May-2929.4$1,329
FNMA 567875Pooled - Dana6.336%2.5%1-Dec-001-Sep-3029.8$2,335
FNMA 593941Pooled - Dana6.010%1.8%1-Dec-011-Dec-3029.0$5,765
FNMA 545057Pooled - Dana5.487%2.2%1-May-011-May-3130.0$632
FNMA 650970Pooled - Dana5.118%2.3%1-Aug-011-Jul-3230.9$2,839
FNMA 555378Pooled - Dana5.120%2.1%14-May-081-Apr-3324.9$58,927
FNMA 709092Pooled - Dana5.085%2.2%1-Jun-031-Jun-3330.0$12,396
FNMA 723661Pooled - Dana5.025%2.1%1-Jul-031-Jul-3330.0$1,962
FNMA 761737Pooled - Dana6.488%2.2%16-May-051-Dec-3328.6$11,686
FNMA 725462Pooled - Dana5.688%1.8%1-Apr-041-Jan-3429.8$11,282
FNMA 745160Pooled - Dana5.763%2.2%1-Dec-051-Mar-3428.3$23,574
FNMA 791573Pooled - Dana5.057%2.2%1-Jul-041-Aug-3430.1$3,458
Government Securities
as of 12/31/12
Investments 123120124
4/2/2013
Days/Years
Int RatePurchaseMaturityto MaturityMarket
AgencyBrokerCouponYieldDateDateat PurchaseValue
Government Securities
as of 12/31/12
FNMA 888321Pooled - Dana5.737%2.2%1-Mar-071-Aug-3427.3$31,546
FNMA 849207Pooled - Dana6.340%1.8%1-Jan-061-Jan-3630.0$10,619
FNMA 888710Pooled - Dana5.374%2.2%1-Sep-071-Jul-3628.9$36,056
FNMA 893933Pooled - Dana5.209%2.3%1-Sep-061-Oct-3630.1$16,038
FNMA 555624Pooled - Dana5.366%2.2%1-Jun-031-Mar-3834.8$5,572
FNMA 735967Pooled - Dana6.107%2.2%1-Sep-051-Mar-3832.5$9,393
FNMA 888386Pooled - Dana5.623%2.2%1-Apr-071-Mar-3830.9$67,575
FNMA 888618Pooled - Dana5.799%2.2%1-Jul-071-Mar-3830.7$22,175
FNMA 995451Pooled - Dana4.581%2.2%12-Feb-091-May-3829.2$61,743
FNMA 557073Pooled - Dana4.255%1.5%1-Sep-001-Jun-4039.8$5,163
FNMA 110540Pooled - Dana5.150%2.9%1-Nov-901-May-2029.5$5,766
FNMA 327446Pooled - Dana5.747%2.4%1-Oct-951-Aug-2226.9$2,910
FNMA 555921Pooled - Dana3.000%2.9%1-Sep-121-Sep-3523.0$28,058
FNMA 868877Pooled - Dana5.191%2.3%1-Apr-061-Apr-3630.0$10,606
FNMA 701045Pooled - Dana4.830%2.5%1-Apr-031-Apr-3330.0$69,552
FNMA 848390Pooled - Dana3.755%1.8%12-Feb-091-Dec-3526.8$29,420
FNMA 844148Pooled - Dana3.183%2.0%1-Oct-051-Nov-3530.1$30,748
FNMA 748087Pooled - Dana2.585%2.2%1-Sep-101-Sep-3323.0$63,210
FNMA 851297Pooled - Dana2.604%2.4%3-May-111-Sep-3524.3$299,031
FNMA AC0038Pooled - Dana2.355%2.3%24-May-111-Sep-3827.3$285,078
FHLMC 775572Pooled - Dana5.594%3.2%1-Sep-941-Jun-2429.8$8,335
FHLMC 865469Pooled - Dana6.440%3.4%1-Dec-951-Aug-2529.7$556
FHLMC 755344Pooled - Dana5.160%2.3%1-May-001-Mar-2827.9$2,645
FHLMC 645235Pooled - Dana6.340%2.3%1-Jul-001-Mar-2928.7$2,321
FHLMC 846784Pooled - Dana5.576%2.2%1-Jul-001-May-2928.9$2,222
FHLMC 786867Pooled - Dana5.970%2.4%1-Nov-991-Aug-2929.8$107
FHLMC 846956Pooled - Dana6.446%2.4%1-Nov-011-Nov-3130.0$1,584
FHLMC 847166Pooled - Dana5.092%2.3%1-Jul-031-Aug-3330.1$4,802
FHLMC 847359Pooled - Dana6.072%2.3%1-Dec-041-Dec-3430.0$4,618
FHLMC 782526Pooled - Dana4.509%2.1%1-Apr-051-Apr-3530.0$84,986
FHLMC 848000Pooled - Dana4.665%2.2%1-Sep-081-Feb-3627.4$66,000
FHLMC 847629 Pooled - Dana6.092%2.3%1-Oct-061-Sep-3629.9$18,745
FHLMC 865006Pooled - Dana6.935%2.9%1-Feb-891-Aug-1829.5$463
FHLMC 865127Pooled - Dana3.130%3.1%1-Aug-891-Mar-1929.6$1,318
FHLMC 865476Pooled - Dana6.082%4.4%1-Apr-961-Feb-3639.9$519
FHLMC 865663Pooled - Dana6.040%4.0%1-Nov-001-Feb-3029.3$2,962
FHLMC 765114Pooled - Dana6.963%4.5%1-Mar-991-Jan-1818.9$2,545
FHLMC 847427Pooled - Dana5.264%2.7%1-Jul-051-Sep-3429.2$5,118
FHLMC 1G1840Pooled - Dana5.315%2.6%1-Feb-061-Nov-3529.8$19,694
FHLMC 1B3063Pooled - Dana5.553%2.7%1-Aug-061-Aug-3630.0$22,237
FHLMC 847058Pooled - Dana5.181%2.2%1-Aug-021-Aug-3230.0$21,014
FHLMC 1B7033Pooled - Dana2.846%2.6%25-May-111-Sep-3530.0$253,796
FHLMC 611384Pooled - Dana6.953%2.3%11-Feb-051-Dec-3227.8$9,090
TSY 912828HW30.625%0.6%30-Jun-1215-Apr-130.8$251,535
TSY 912828BD11.875%1.5%30-Jun-1215-Jul-131.0$512,329
TSY 912828KM11.250%1.1%30-Jun-1215-Apr-141.8$225,657
TSY 912828CP32.000%1.5%30-Jun-1215-Jul-142.0$259,184
TSY 912828MY30.500%0.5%15-Apr-152.0$278,741
FNMA Fixed rate agency 3135G0HG10.375%0.4%1-Jan-1216-Mar-153.2 $400,496
FNMA Fixed rate agency 3136FT4B20.500%0.7%31-Dec-116-Sep-131.7$300,246
FNMA Fixed rate agency 3134G3PD60.550%0.6%31-Dec-1127-Feb-153.2$501,260
Accrued Interest1.9%$18,485
Income Receivable $6,097
Average Yield1.93%6,118,645
Total$17,788,151
Investments 123120125
4/2/2013
20
1
2
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
FI
N
A
N
C
E
Ap
r
i
l
2
,
2
0
1
3
4/2/2013
Po
l
i
c
y
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
St
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
V
a
i
l
T
o
w
n
C
o
d
e
–
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
P
o
l
i
c
y
2
To
w
n
of
Va
i
l
|
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
|
04
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
3
1.
S
a
f
e
t
y
2.
L
i
q
u
i
d
i
t
y
3.
Y
i
e
l
d
4/2/2013
Yi
e
l
d
20
1
2
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
a
s
a
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
y
i
e
l
d
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
Tr
e
a
s
u
r
y
y
i
e
l
d
s
r
e
m
a
i
n
e
d
l
o
w
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
d
e
c
l
i
n
e
s
i
n
20
1
1
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
a
t
m
a
t
u
r
e
d
o
r
we
r
e
c
a
l
l
e
d
c
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
re
i
n
v
e
s
t
e
d
a
t
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
r
a
t
e
s
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
r
a
t
e
s
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
pe
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
(
c
a
l
l
e
d
“
s
t
e
p
s
”
)
we
r
e
s
h
o
r
t
-
l
i
v
e
d
Th
e
F
e
d
h
a
s
r
e
a
f
f
i
r
m
e
d
t
h
e
i
r
co
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
l
o
w
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
3
To
w
n
of
Va
i
l
|
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
|
4/
0
2
/
2
0
1
3
3 Mo
s
.
6 Mo
s
.
1 Yr
.
2
Yr
s
.
5
Yrs.10 Yrs.30 Yrs.
31
‐De
c
‐10
0.
1
2
%
0
.
1
9
%
0
.
2
9
%
0
.
5
9
%
2
.
0
1
%
3
.
2
9
%
4
.
3
3
%
31
‐De
c
‐11
0.
0
2
%
0
.
0
6
%
0
.
1
2
%
0
.
2
4
%
0
.
8
3
%
1
.
8
7
%
2
.
8
9
%
31
‐De
c
‐12
0.
0
5
%
0
.
1
1
%
0
.
1
6
%
0
.
2
5
%
0
.
7
2
%
1
.
7
8
%
2
.
9
5
%
0.
0
0
%
1.
0
0
%
2.
0
0
%
3.
0
0
%
4.
0
0
%
5.
0
0
%
TR
E
A
S
U
R
Y
Y
I
E
L
D
S
4/2/2013
To
w
n
o
f
V
a
i
l
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Co
m
p
a
r
e
d
w
i
t
h
b
e
n
c
h
m
a
r
k
1
y
e
a
r
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
y
Bo
t
h
t
h
e
t
o
w
n
’
s
y
i
e
l
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
be
n
c
h
m
a
r
k
f
e
l
l
i
n
Q
1
a
n
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
Q
2
To
w
n
y
i
e
l
d
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
i
n
Q
3
a
n
d
Q
4
w
h
i
l
e
th
e
b
e
n
c
h
m
a
r
k
f
e
l
l
Th
e
s
p
r
e
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
T
O
V
yi
e
l
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
b
e
n
c
h
m
a
r
k
gr
e
w
f
r
o
m
3
7
b
a
s
i
s
p
o
i
n
t
s
a
t
th
e
e
n
d
o
f
2
0
1
1
t
o
4
8
b
a
s
i
s
po
i
n
t
s
b
y
y
e
a
r
e
n
d
2
0
1
2
4
To
w
n
of
Va
i
l
|
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
|
4/
2
/
2
0
1
3
Q4
11
Q
1
12
Q
2
12
Q
3
12Q4 12
1 Ye
a
r
Tr
e
a
s
u
r
y
0.
1
2
%
0
.
0
7
%
0
.
2
1
%
0
.
1
7
%
0
.
1
6
%
To
w
n
of
Va
i
l
0.
4
9
%
0
.
4
4
%
0
.
6
2
%
0
.
6
3
%
0
.
7
9
%
0.
0
0
%
0.
1
0
%
0.
2
0
%
0.
3
0
%
0.
4
0
%
0.
5
0
%
0.
6
0
%
0.
7
0
%
0.
8
0
%
0.
9
0
%
YI
E
L
D
C
O
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N
4/2/2013
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
M
i
x
5
To
w
n
of
Va
i
l
|
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
|
4/
2
/
2
0
1
3
Colorado Pool 35%
CD
'
s
21
%
Go
v
'
t
Se
c
u
r
i
t
i
e
s
28
%
Ca
s
h
16
%
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
31
,
2012
Co
l
o
r
a
d
o
Po
o
l
49
%
CD
'
s
13
%
Go
v
'
t
Se
c
u
r
i
t
i
e
s
20
%
Ca
s
h
18
%
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
31
,
20
1
1
4/2/2013
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
6
To
w
n
of
Va
i
l
|
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
|
4/
0
2
/
2
0
1
3
< 1yr
56
%
1‐2 yr
s
7%
2‐5 yr
s
30
%
> 5 yr
s
7%
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
31
,
20
1
2
< 1 ye
a
r
72
%
1‐2 yr
s
3%
2‐5 yr
s
21
%
> 5 yr
s
4%
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
31
,
20
1
1
4/2/2013
20
1
3
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
7
To
w
n
of
Va
i
l
|
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
|
4/
0
2
/
2
0
1
3
St
i
c
k
t
o
o
u
r
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
:
s
a
f
e
t
y
,
li
q
u
i
d
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
y
i
e
l
d
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
m
a
n
a
g
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
m
i
x
a
n
d
m
a
t
u
r
i
t
i
e
s
Us
e
l
o
w
-
y
i
e
l
d
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
s
t
o
p
a
y
o
f
f
e
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
d
e
b
t
o
n
Ti
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
4/2/2013
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2013
ITEM/TOPIC: Second reading of Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 supplementing the 2013
budget
PRESENTER(S): Kathleen Halloran
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or approve with amendments Ordinance No.
6, Series 2013
BACKGROUND: Please see attached memo
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve or approve with amendments Ordinance No. 6,
Series 2013
ATTACHMENTS:
1st Supp 2nd
4/2/2013
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Finance Department
DATE: March 28, 2013
SUBJECT: 2013 Supplemental Appropriation
On Tuesday evening, you will be asked to approve the first supplemental appropriation
of 2013 upon second reading.
Changes from first reading
The following items reflect information requested by Council or updates since first
reading:
Capital Projects Fund
To clarify the requested re-appropriation of $148,336 for flood incident repairs: In 2012
Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD) reimbursed the town for work done
on the Bighorn Creek (at Spruce Way) water main repairs. The 2011/2012 budgets did
not anticipate the expenditure of this work due to ERWSD’s participation. Since the
town ultimately managed the project, we should have budgeted both the revenue and
expenditure so as not to reduce the budget available for other projects on the 2011
Flood Assessment Projects Summary list reviewed by Council. Staff is requesting
appropriation of those dollars to complete the flood repair plan.
An updated amount of budget overage on the Main Vail Fire Station renovation now
totals $215,000 (previously reported as $190,000) due to a clerical error by the
contractor (they gave us double credit for value engineered items). Please see
attached memo for more details on the project and this request.
Council requested more information on the request for $630,000 for parking along the
frontage road across from Safeway. The improvements would include sidewalks,
lighting, curb and gutter and a bus stop shelter. Per the lease agreement with CDOT,
the “installation of parking lane improvements” must be completed prior to November
15, 2013.
4/2/2013
- 2 -
Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) Fund
Council had further questions regarding the proposed $360,000 use of savings from the
frontage road bike paths completed in 2012 toward reconstruction of the streamwalk
path into Ford Park. The current slope on the eastern side of the path is at a 17%
grade, which is very steep for pedestrians. The reconstruction would reduce that grade
to a maximum of 8% slope. Please see attached memo from Public Works for
additional details on this project.
$5,657 of Environmental Sustainability programs is proposed for re-appropriation for
the purchase of a portable solar trailer that was ordered in 2012 but not received until
2013. “Sunny the Solar Roller” is a portable solar system designed to provide green
energy and education at Vail’s public events. The 2-panel trailer system is modeled
after the original Solar Roller designed by the Community Office of Resource Efficiency
(CORE) in Aspen which has proved to be a valuable educational tool, appearing
frequently at events and schools throughout the community.
In Vail, each special event permit holder must first complete the Celebrate Green!
program checklist, which is a points-based system that incentivizes sustainable
practices and requires basic environmental responsibility. Sunny the Solar Roller will
now be included in the program, making the permit holder eligible for additional points
and a rebate on permit fees.
When not in use at special events, the system may be plugged in and used to offset
building power.
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
U
n
a
u
d
i
t
e
d
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Lo
c
a
l
T
a
x
e
s
:
1
8
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
2
3
6
,
3
4
7
$
1
,
3
3
6
,
3
4
7
$
2
0
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
S
p
l
i
t
b
/
t
G
e
n
'
l
F
u
n
d
&
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
61
/
3
9
57
/
4
3
6
2
/
3
8
6
2
/
3
8
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
1
1
,
5
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
5
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
-
$
1
2
,
4
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
4
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
O
w
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
4
,
2
3
2
,
0
0
0
4
,
1
5
7
,
2
7
9
(
7
4
,
7
2
1
)
4
,
2
1
7
,
0
0
0
4
,
2
1
7
,
0
0
0
S
k
i
L
i
f
t
T
a
x
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
3
,
4
3
3
,
6
8
6
(
5
8
,
3
1
4
)
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
F
e
e
s
,
P
e
n
a
l
t
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
O
t
h
e
r
T
a
x
e
s
1
,
0
3
7
,
7
5
3
1
,
0
0
3
,
3
1
8
(
3
4
,
4
3
5
)
1
,
0
7
4
,
4
4
2
1
,
0
7
4
,
4
4
2
Li
c
e
n
s
e
s
&
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
1,
1
5
5
,
0
0
0
1
,
4
7
0
,
5
8
8
3
1
5
,
5
8
8
1
,
2
8
0
,
5
8
0
9
,
5
0
0
1
,
2
9
0
,
0
8
0
Li
m
o
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
1,
9
8
8
,
1
5
0
1
,
8
7
5
,
0
2
8
(
1
1
3
,
1
2
2
)
1
,
8
6
1
,
9
1
4
1
,
8
6
1
,
9
1
4
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
3
,
8
3
9
,
0
0
0
3
,
4
6
4
,
5
4
6
(
3
7
4
,
4
5
4
)
3
,
8
5
1
,
0
0
0
3
,
8
5
1
,
0
0
0
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
8
2
9
,
5
9
6
9
1
9
,
8
0
0
90
,
2
0
4
7
5
9
,
3
4
7
7
5
9
,
3
4
7
Fi
n
e
s
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
s
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
5
1
,
5
0
1
(
7
3
,
4
9
9
)
2
7
0
,
8
8
7
2
7
0
,
8
8
7
Ea
r
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
1
1
6
,
9
0
0
1
3
7
,
6
8
1
2
0
,
7
8
1
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
Re
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
9
2
9
,
8
1
6
8
3
2
,
1
3
4
(
9
7
,
6
8
2
)
9
0
5
,
6
0
5
9
0
5
,
6
0
5
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
a
n
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
R
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
3
3
4
,
0
0
0
8
9
5
,
3
6
4
56
1
,
3
6
4
17
5
,
0
0
0
17
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
9
,
8
0
9
,
2
1
5
2
9
,
9
7
0
,
9
2
5
1
6
1
,
7
1
0
3
0
,
5
2
4
,
7
7
5
9
,
5
0
0
3
0
,
5
3
4
,
2
7
5
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Sa
l
a
r
i
e
s
1
3
,
8
3
3
,
2
7
1
1
3
,
3
5
5
,
9
3
9
47
7
,
3
3
2
1
3
,
9
9
1
,
0
3
6
1
3
,
9
9
1
,
0
3
6
Be
n
e
f
i
t
s
4
,
6
0
0
,
3
9
6
4
,
8
3
1
,
4
5
5
(
2
3
1
,
0
5
9
)
4,
7
5
4
,
7
4
1
4,
7
5
4
,
7
4
1
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
C
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
1
8
,
4
3
3
,
6
6
7
1
8
,
1
8
7
,
3
9
4
2
4
6
,
2
7
3
1
8
,
7
4
5
,
7
7
7
1
8
,
7
4
5
,
7
7
7
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
E
v
e
n
t
s
1
,
5
4
1
,
2
1
8
1
,
4
9
9
,
7
8
2
41
,
4
3
6
1,
5
4
8
,
6
4
8
5
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
5
9
8
,
6
4
8
Va
i
l
5
0
t
h
D
V
D
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
Al
l
O
t
h
e
r
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
6
,
6
2
5
,
2
5
1
5
,
8
5
7
,
5
6
7
7
6
7
,
6
8
4
6
,
8
1
2
,
5
9
3
3
1
,
5
0
0
6
,
8
4
4
,
0
9
3
Su
m
m
e
r
A
i
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
2
3
.
5
K
;
L
i
m
o
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
ex
p
e
n
s
e
$
5
K
;
G
r
a
n
d
V
i
e
w
m
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
$
3
K
He
a
v
y
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
2
,
2
7
8
,
3
0
4
2
,
1
2
9
,
0
4
8
1
4
9
,
2
5
6
2
,
2
8
2
,
7
9
6
2,
2
8
2
,
7
9
6
He
a
v
y
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
5
4
7
,
0
0
8
5
3
0
,
5
6
0
1
6
,
4
4
8
56
0
,
2
8
4
5
6
0
,
2
8
4
Di
s
p
a
t
c
h
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
5
7
5
,
7
0
6
5
7
2
,
7
0
6
3
,
0
0
0
5
6
9
,
1
9
3
56
9
,
1
9
3
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
30
,
0
0
1
,
1
5
4
2
8
,
7
7
7
,
0
5
7
1
,
2
2
4
,
0
9
7
3
0
,
5
1
9
,
2
9
1
8
1
,
5
0
0
3
0
,
6
0
0
,
7
9
1
Re
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
(
U
n
d
e
r
)
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(
1
9
1
,
9
3
9
)
1
,
1
9
3
,
8
6
8
1
,
3
8
5
,
8
0
7
5
,
4
8
4
(
7
2
,
0
0
0
)
(
6
6
,
5
1
6
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
F
u
n
d
(5
2
,
0
0
0
)
(
5
2
,
0
0
0
)
-
-
-
Ti
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
-
-
-
(
8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
T
i
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
d
e
e
d
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
20
1
5
W
o
r
l
d
A
l
p
i
n
e
S
k
i
C
h
a
m
p
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
s
(2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
-
(
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
Pr
o
-
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
e
v
e
n
t
-
-
-
(
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
20
1
5
N
a
t
i
o
n
'
s
E
v
e
n
t
(3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
-
(
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
Va
i
l
'
s
5
0
t
h
A
n
n
i
v
e
r
s
a
r
y
(3
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
-
-
-
Bu
r
t
o
n
U
S
O
p
e
n
-
-
-
(
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
-
-
Su
r
p
l
u
s
N
e
t
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
&
N
e
w
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
(
1
,
2
1
8
,
9
3
9
)
1
6
6
,
8
6
8
1
,
3
8
5
,
8
0
7
(
9
,
0
9
4
,
5
1
6
)
(
9
,
1
6
6
,
5
1
6
)
-
-
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
2
3
,
5
4
6
,
2
8
5
2
3
,
5
4
6
,
2
8
5
-
2
2
,
3
2
7
,
3
4
6
1
,
3
8
5
,
8
0
7
2
3
,
7
1
3
,
1
5
3
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
2
2
,
3
2
7
,
3
4
6
$
2
3
,
7
1
3
,
1
5
3
$
1
,
3
8
5
,
8
0
7
$
1
3
,
2
3
2
,
8
3
0
$
1
4
,
5
4
6
,
6
3
7
$
EH
O
P
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
e
n
d
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
-
no
t
s
p
e
n
d
a
b
l
e
69
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
GE
N
E
R
A
L
F
U
N
D
3
4/2/2013
20
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
2
0
1
3
Am
e
n
d
e
d
Un
a
u
d
i
t
e
d
Fa
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Lo
c
a
l
T
a
x
e
s
:
1
8
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
2
3
6
,
3
4
7
$
1
,
3
3
6
,
3
4
7
$
2
0
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
S
p
l
i
t
b
/
t
G
e
n
'
l
F
u
n
d
&
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
u
n
61
/
3
9
57
/
4
3
6
1
/
3
9
6
2
/
3
8
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
1
1
,
5
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
5
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
-
$
1
2
,
4
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
4
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
O
w
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
4
,
2
3
2
,
0
0
0
4
,
1
5
7
,
2
7
9
(
7
4
,
7
2
1
)
$
4
,
2
1
7
,
0
0
0
4
,
2
1
7
,
0
0
0
S
k
i
L
i
f
t
T
a
x
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
3
,
4
3
3
,
6
8
6
(
5
8
,
3
1
4
)
$
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
3
,
4
9
2
,
0
0
0
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
F
e
e
s
,
P
e
n
a
l
t
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
O
t
h
e
r
T
a
x
e
s
1,
0
3
7
,
7
5
3
1
,
0
0
3
,
3
1
8
(
3
4
,
4
3
5
)
$
1
,
0
7
4
,
4
4
2
1
,
0
7
4
,
4
4
2
Li
c
e
n
s
e
s
&
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
1,
1
5
5
,
0
0
0
1
,
4
7
0
,
5
8
8
3
1
5
,
5
8
8
$
1
,
2
8
0
,
5
8
0
9
,
5
0
0
1
,
2
9
0
,
0
8
0
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
1,
9
8
8
,
1
5
0
1
,
8
7
5
,
0
2
8
(
1
1
3
,
1
2
2
)
$
1
,
8
6
1
,
9
1
4
1
,
8
6
1
,
9
1
4
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
3
,
8
3
9
,
0
0
0
3
,
4
6
4
,
5
4
6
(
3
7
4
,
4
5
4
)
$
3
,
8
5
1
,
0
0
0
3
,
8
5
1
,
0
0
0
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
82
9
,
5
9
6
9
1
9
,
8
0
0
90
,
2
0
4
$
7
5
9
,
3
4
7
7
5
9
,
3
4
7
Fi
n
e
s
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
s
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
5
1
,
5
0
1
(
7
3
,
4
9
9
)
$
2
7
0
,
8
8
7
2
7
0
,
8
8
7
Ea
r
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
1
1
6
,
9
0
0
1
3
7
,
6
8
1
2
0
,
7
8
1
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
Re
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
9
2
9
,
8
1
6
8
3
2
,
1
3
4
(
9
7
,
6
8
2
)
$
9
0
5
,
6
0
5
9
0
5
,
6
0
5
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
a
n
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
R
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
3
3
4
,
0
0
0
8
9
5
,
3
6
4
56
1
,
3
6
4
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
17
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
9
,
8
0
9
,
2
1
5
2
9
,
9
7
0
,
9
2
5
1
6
1
,
7
1
0
3
0
,
5
2
4
,
7
7
5
9
,
5
0
0
3
0
,
5
3
4
,
2
7
5
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
b
y
T
y
p
e
:
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
T
o
w
n
O
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
s
1
,
4
3
7
,
1
3
4
1
,
2
9
1
,
4
6
7
(
1
4
5
,
6
6
7
)
1
,
4
2
3
,
6
5
4
1
,
4
2
3
,
6
5
4
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
&
R
i
s
k
M
a
n
a
gem
e
n
t
3,
6
8
3
,
1
9
5
3
,
5
8
1
,
5
7
2
(
1
0
1
,
6
2
3
)
3
,
8
8
4
,
5
1
0
3
,
8
8
4
,
5
1
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
&
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
1
,
6
1
1
,
9
7
9
1
,
5
0
3
,
1
8
2
(
1
0
8
,
7
9
8
)
1
,
5
6
2
,
0
4
6
1
,
5
6
2
,
0
4
6
P
o
l
i
c
e
4,
6
2
1
,
4
2
3
4
,
2
6
1
,
1
0
1
(
3
6
0
,
3
2
2
)
4
,
6
9
9
,
0
6
9
5
,
0
0
0
4
,
7
0
4
,
0
6
9
P
o
l
i
c
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
5
7
5
,
7
0
6
5
7
2
,
7
0
6
(
3
,
0
0
0
)
5
6
9
,
1
9
3
5
6
9
,
1
9
3
F
i
r
e
3,
1
7
9
,
3
2
1
3
,
2
7
6
,
3
5
2
9
7
,
0
3
1
3
,
2
6
9
,
0
0
0
3
,
2
6
9
,
0
0
0
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
&
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
3
,
6
7
4
,
7
3
3
3
,
4
4
1
,
8
8
4
(
2
3
2
,
8
4
9
)
3
,
7
7
8
,
1
7
8
3
,
7
7
8
,
1
7
8
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
4
,
9
7
4
,
0
3
2
4
,
9
1
5
,
1
9
1
(
5
8
,
8
4
1
)
5
,
0
1
1
,
1
6
1
5
,
0
1
1
,
1
6
1
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
3,
6
8
8
,
8
4
5
3
,
4
2
8
,
8
3
0
(
2
6
0
,
0
1
5
)
3
,
7
5
4
,
3
7
4
3
,
0
0
0
3
,
7
5
7
,
3
7
4
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
8
1
6
,
7
5
1
7
9
5
,
6
2
0
(
2
1
,
1
3
1
)
8
1
3
,
9
5
9
8
1
3
,
9
5
9
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
1
,
7
3
8
,
0
3
5
1
,
7
0
9
,
1
5
1
(
2
8
,
8
8
4
)
1
,
7
5
4
,
1
4
7
7
3
,
5
0
0
1
,
8
2
7
,
6
4
7
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
3
0
,
0
0
1
,
1
5
4
2
8
,
7
7
7
,
0
5
7
(
1
,
2
2
4
,
0
9
7
)
3
0
,
5
1
9
,
2
9
1
8
1
,
5
0
0
3
0
,
6
0
0
,
7
9
1
Re
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
(
U
n
d
e
r
)
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(1
9
1
,
9
3
9
)
1
,
1
9
3
,
8
6
8
1
,
3
8
5
,
8
0
7
5
,
4
8
4
(
7
2
,
0
0
0
)
(
6
6
,
5
1
6
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
F
u
n
d
(5
2
,
0
0
0
)
(
5
2
,
0
0
0
)
-
-
-
Ti
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
B
u
y
-
D
o
w
n
-
-
-
(
8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
20
1
5
W
o
r
l
d
A
l
p
i
n
e
S
k
i
C
h
a
m
p
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
s
(2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
-
(
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
Pr
o
-
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
e
v
e
n
t
-
-
-
(
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
20
1
5
N
a
t
i
o
n
'
s
E
v
e
n
t
(3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
-
(
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
Va
i
l
'
s
5
0
t
h
A
n
n
i
v
e
r
s
a
r
y
(3
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
)
-
-
-
Bu
r
t
o
n
U
S
O
p
e
n
-
-
-
(
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
31
,
0
2
8
,
1
5
4
2
9
,
8
0
4
,
0
5
7
(
1
,
2
2
4
,
0
9
7
)
3
9
,
6
1
9
,
2
9
1
3
9
,
7
0
0
,
7
9
1
Su
r
p
l
u
s
N
e
t
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
&
N
e
w
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
(
1
,
2
1
8
,
9
3
9
)
1
6
6
,
8
6
8
1
,
3
8
5
,
8
0
7
(
9
,
0
9
4
,
5
1
6
)
(
9
,
1
6
6
,
5
1
6
)
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
2
3
,
5
4
6
,
2
8
5
2
3
,
5
4
6
,
2
8
5
2
1
,
6
4
5
,
2
2
4
2
2
,
3
2
7
,
3
4
6
1
,
3
8
5
,
8
0
7
2
3
,
7
1
3
,
1
5
3
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
2
2
,
3
2
7
,
3
4
6
$
2
3
,
7
1
3
,
1
5
3
$
2
3
,
0
3
1
,
0
3
1
$
1
3
,
2
3
2
,
8
3
0
$
1
4
,
5
4
6
,
6
3
7
$
EH
O
P
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
e
n
d
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
ba
l
a
n
c
e
-
n
o
t
s
p
e
n
d
a
b
l
e
69
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
GE
N
E
R
A
L
F
U
N
D
4
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
op
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
U
n
a
u
d
i
t
e
d
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
To
t
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
:
1
8
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
20
,
2
3
6
,
3
4
7
$
1,
3
3
6
,
3
4
7
$
2
0
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
S
p
l
i
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
&
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
61
/
3
9
5
7
/
4
3
6
2
/
3
8
6
2
/
3
8
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
F
u
n
d
7
,
3
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
,
7
0
6
,
3
4
7
$
1
,
3
3
6
,
3
4
7
$
7
,
6
3
8
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
6
3
8
,
0
0
0
$
Us
e
T
a
x
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
2
2
1
,
7
3
4
2
1
,
7
3
4
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Fe
d
e
r
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
1
,
1
8
4
,
0
0
0
7
2
6
,
4
4
4
(
4
5
7
,
5
5
6
)
-
-
2
0
1
2
:
$
3
9
4
.
4
K
f
o
r
b
r
i
d
g
e
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
;
$3
2
1
.
9
K
f
o
r
b
u
s
e
s
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
e
a
r
l
i
e
r
t
h
i
s
y
e
a
r
Ot
h
e
r
S
t
a
t
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
-
-
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
C
D
O
T
s
h
a
r
e
o
f
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
S
i
m
b
a
R
u
n
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
s
t
u
d
y
(
5
0
/
5
0
w
i
t
h
T
O
V
)
Le
a
s
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
1
8
8
,
1
6
0
1
9
2
,
7
1
0
4
,
5
5
0
1
9
2
,
6
6
0
1
9
2
,
6
6
0
P
e
r
V
a
i
l
C
o
m
m
o
n
s
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
e
a
s
e
s
Em
p
l
o
y
e
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
F
e
e
-
I
n
-
L
i
e
u
7
0
,
0
0
0
1
3
2
,
6
1
7
6
2
,
6
1
7
-
-
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
R
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
1
7
4
,
4
3
5
2
4
5
,
1
9
2
7
0
,
7
5
7
-
-
20
1
2
:
$
1
1
1
K
s
h
a
r
e
d
c
o
s
t
s
f
o
r
I
-
7
0
N
o
i
s
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
h
o
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
s
$
8
K
,
C
D
O
T
$
9
3
K
a
n
d
E
R
W
S
D
$
1
0
K
)
;
$
2
8
,
7
8
3
en
e
r
g
y
r
e
b
a
t
e
s
;
$
3
4
,
6
5
2
r
e
i
m
b
f
r
o
m
V
R
D
f
o
r
t
e
n
a
n
t
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
s
in
W
e
l
c
o
m
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
;
$
2
0
K
C
D
O
T
F
t
g
R
d
re
i
m
b
f
r
o
m
V
a
i
l
R
e
s
o
r
t
s
;
$1
4
8
K
f
r
o
m
E
R
W
S
D
f
o
r
S
p
r
u
c
e
W
a
y
w
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
a
t
B
i
gh
o
r
n
C
r
e
e
k
TR
A
H
C
26
8
,
0
9
4
2
6
8
,
0
9
4
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
n
l
o
a
n
s
t
o
T
R
A
H
C
Ea
r
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
O
t
h
e
r
8
1
,
0
0
0
1
3
0
,
1
4
5
4
9
,
1
4
5
5
7
,
2
9
5
3
0
,
0
0
0
8
7
,
2
9
5
$
3
0
K
s
a
l
e
o
f
o
l
d
f
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
1
0
,
2
6
7
,
5
9
5
1
1
,
3
5
5
,
1
8
9
1
,
0
8
7
,
5
9
4
9
,
3
5
6
,
0
4
9
3
0
,
0
0
0
9
,
3
8
6
,
0
4
9
Bu
s
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
3
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
-
3
0
,
0
0
0
-
3
0
,
0
0
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
6
7
0
,
0
0
0
2
6
1
,
2
3
3
4
0
8
,
7
6
7
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
5
,
0
0
0
6
6
5
,
0
0
0
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
o
v
e
r
ha
u
l
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
s
y
s
t
e
m
/
c
on
d
u
i
t
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
e
a
s
t
stairs at LH parking
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
M
a
i
n
t
en
a
n
c
e
8
9
8
,
9
9
9
5
1
6
,
7
2
8
3
8
2
,
2
7
1
5
9
2
,
0
0
0
-
5
9
2
,
0
0
0
20
1
3
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
c
k
e
r
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
a
t
V
a
i
l
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
b
o
i
l
e
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
P
o
l
i
c
e
,
n
e
w
r
o
o
f
o
n
P
W
Ad
m
i
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
t
E
a
s
t
V
a
i
l
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
i
t
e
m
s
Go
r
e
R
a
n
g
e
C
o
n
d
o
U
n
i
t
s
2
E
&
3
W
3
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
Go
r
e
R
a
n
g
e
T
o
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
en
t
f
o
r
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
s
t
a
i
r
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
d
e
c
k
s
(
3
u
n
i
t
s
,
$1
0
K
e
a
c
h
)
Cr
e
e
k
s
i
d
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4
0
0
,
8
0
0
4
0
0
,
8
0
0
-
-
-
-
Ne
e
d
t
o
g
u
t
p
l
u
m
b
i
n
g
;
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
w
i
r
i
n
g
;
r
o
o
f
i
n
g
,
e
t
c
.
;
a
s
be
s
t
o
s
a
n
d
m
o
l
d
r
e
m
e
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
;
4
u
n
i
t
s
w
e
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
20
1
0
;
4
i
n
2
0
1
1
;
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
4
u
n
i
t
s
i
n
20
1
2
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
si
d
i
n
g
,
s
t
a
i
rs and decks
Do
n
o
v
a
n
P
a
r
k
P
a
v
il
i
o
n
5
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
-
5
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
2
:
$
5
0
K
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
;
2
0
1
4
:
$
4
0
0
K
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
v
e
n
t
i
l
a
t
i
o
n
&
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
n
o
i
s
e
a
n
d
$
2
7
0
K
t
o
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
he
a
t
i
n
g
/
a
i
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
;
2
0
1
6
$
5
0
K
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
St
r
e
e
t
L
i
g
h
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
5
0
,
0
0
0
4
9
,
9
5
4
4
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
-
5
0
,
0
0
0
N
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
f
u
r
b
i
s
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
8
4
0
,
0
7
8
6
7
3
,
5
4
5
1
6
6
,
5
3
3
7
3
5
,
9
0
0
-
7
3
5
,
9
0
0
O
n
-
g
o
i
n
g
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
r
o
a
d
s
a
n
d
b
r
i
d
g
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
,
p
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
C
e
n
t
e
r
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
4
1
8
1
3
8
,
5
8
3
-
-
-
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
a
t
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
:
C
a
n
c
e
l
l
e
d
Fl
o
o
d
i
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
3
4
9
,
1
9
2
3
6
3
,
4
4
6
(
1
4
,
2
5
4
)
-
1
4
8
,
3
3
6
1
4
8
,
3
3
6
Re
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
t
o
u
s
e
$
1
4
8
K
o
f
r
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
E
R
W
S
D
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
2
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
f
l
ood repair projecst;
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
B
i
g
h
o
r
n
C
r
e
e
k
c
u
l
v
e
r
t
a
l
o
n
g
S
p
r
u
c
e
W
a
y
t
o
c
o
i
n
c
i
d
e
w
i
t
h
E
R
W
S
D
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
t
s
a
m
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Fi
r
e
T
r
u
c
k
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
5
9
0
,
0
0
0
5
7
7
,
5
7
4
1
2
,
4
2
6
-
4
2
,
4
2
6
4
2
,
4
2
6
20
1
2
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
p
u
m
p
e
r
t
r
u
c
k
f
r
o
m
1
9
9
4
;
r
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
$
1
2
K
r
e
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
pl
u
s
$
3
0
K
f
r
o
m
s
a
l
e
o
f
o
l
d
f
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
f
o
r
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
t
r
u
c
k
;
2
0
1
4
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
p
u
m
p
e
r
t
r
u
c
k
f
r
o
m
1
9
9
9
Au
d
i
o
V
i
s
u
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
-
-
4
0
,
0
0
0
-
4
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
3
:
$
3
0
K
f
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
e
n
t
i
r
e
A
/
V
s
y
s
t
em
a
t
D
o
n
o
v
a
n
;
$
1
0
K
a
n
n
u
a
l
m
t
c
e
/r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
u
d
i
o
-
v
i
s
u
a
l
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
o
w
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
B
l
d
g
;
G
r
a
n
d
V
i
e
w
,
L
H
W
e
l
c
o
m
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
e
t
c
.
To
w
n
-
w
i
d
e
c
a
m
e
r
a
s
y
s
t
e
m
1
2
,
0
0
0
4
,
9
2
4
7
,
0
7
6
2
3
,
0
0
0
7
,
0
7
6
3
0
,
0
7
6
$1
2
K
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
f
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
c
a
m
e
r
a
s
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
(
8
9
c
a
m
e
r
a
s
a
n
d
4
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
s
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
o
w
n
s
o
f
a
r
)
;
Re
c
o
r
d
e
r
s
c
o
s
t
$
7
-
8
K
e
a
c
h
;
c
a
m
e
r
a
s
r
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
$
8
0
0
-
$
3
8
0
0
e
a
c
h
;
R
e
p
l
a
c
i
n
g
t
h
r
e
e
D
V
R
'
s
i
n
2
0
1
3
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t
I
m
a
g
i
n
g
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
8
,
4
3
9
(
3
,
4
3
9
)
3
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
,
0
0
0
7
0
,
0
0
0
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
o
f
l
a
s
e
r
f
i
c
h
e
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
t
o
e
n
a
b
l
e
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
D
e
v
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
So
f
t
w
a
r
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
i
n
g
4
0
,
0
0
0
4
1
,
8
4
3
(
1
,
8
4
3
)
4
8
,
0
0
0
-
4
8
,
0
0
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
n
e
w
a
l
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
s
Ha
r
d
w
a
r
e
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
1
0
6
,
9
0
0
1
4
8
,
6
6
3
(
4
1
,
7
6
3
)
5
0
,
0
0
0
-
5
0
,
0
0
0
Up
g
r
a
d
e
M
i
c
r
o
s
o
f
t
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
o
n
a
l
l
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
;
r
e
n
e
w
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
s
i
n
f
u
t
u
r
e
;
2
0
1
2
$
1
6
K
I
p
a
d
s
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
f
o
r
b
o
a
r
d
s
;
la
r
g
e
s
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
2
0
1
2
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
w
n
'
s
r
e
m
o
t
e
d
e
s
k
t
o
p
s
e
r
v
e
r
,
o
r
R
D
S
Da
t
a
C
e
n
t
e
r
(
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
R
o
o
m
s
)
1
5
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
9
9
0
2
,
0
1
0
1
5
,
0
0
0
-
1
5
,
0
0
0
B
a
s
e
d
o
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
o
f
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
a
n
d
p
o
w
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
f
o
r
3
c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
r
o
o
m
s
We
b
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
e
-
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
6
1
,
7
0
0
8
,
8
7
5
5
2
,
8
2
5
3
1
,
0
0
0
5
2
,
8
2
5
8
3
,
8
2
5
R
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
n
e
w
w
e
b
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
&
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
e
r
f
a
c
e
s
Co
m
m
D
e
v
A
r
c
G
I
S
S
y
s
t
e
m
-
-
2
8
,
0
0
0
-
2
8
,
0
0
0
We
b
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
o
w
n
G
I
S
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
(
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
C
o
u
n
t
y
'
s
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
G
I
S
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
)
;
2
0
1
3
e
x
penditure to link the system
to
l
a
s
e
r
f
i
c
h
e
s
o
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
c
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
T
O
V
z
o
n
i
n
g
,
D
R
B
r
u
l
e
s
,
a
n
d
f
o
r
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
c
o
d
i
n
g
;
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
m
i
d
-
w
a
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
t
h
e
s
e
r
v
e
r
a
n
d
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
h
a
v
e
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
b
e
e
n
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
.
T
h
i
s
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
will finalize the
se
t
u
p
o
f
t
h
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
Fi
b
e
r
O
p
t
i
c
s
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
2
3
,
0
0
0
5
,
3
2
5
1
7
,
6
7
5
3
9
,
0
0
0
1
7
,
6
7
5
5
6
,
6
7
5
Ca
b
l
i
n
g
/
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
t
o
r
e
p
a
i
r
,
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
&
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
;
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
c
a
b
l
i
n
g
i
n
V
T
C
,
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
F
i
r
e
St
a
t
i
o
n
1
i
n
2
0
1
3
;
Q
M
o
E
f
i
b
e
r
r
i
n
g
i
n
2
0
1
3
(
F
i
b
e
r
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
u
r
t
o
w
n
o
f
f
i
c
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
f
o
r
n
e
w
p
h
o
n
e
sy
s
t
e
m
)
Ne
t
w
o
r
k
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
2
2
,
1
0
0
2
2
,
0
1
7
8
3
6
0
,
0
0
0
-
6
0
,
0
0
0
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
-
r
e
p
l
ac
e
m
e
n
t
c
y
c
l
e
e
v
e
r
y
3-
5
y
e
a
r
s
;
2
0
1
3
r
e
p
l
ac
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
s
w
i
t
ches and routers
Ph
o
n
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
3
5
,
0
0
0
3
5
,
0
0
0
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
3
5
,
0
0
0
1
8
5
,
0
0
0
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
fo
r
1
5
-
y
e
a
r
o
l
d
ph
o
n
e
sy
s
t
e
m
;
W
o
r
k
s
t
ar
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
3
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
S
y
s
t
e
m
5
9
,
0
0
0
5
9
,
9
9
7
(
9
9
7
)
6
1
,
0
0
0
-
6
1
,
0
0
0
An
n
u
a
l
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
"
C
o
u
n
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
"
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
A
i
d
e
d
D
i
s
p
a
t
c
h
/
R
e
c
o
r
d
s
M
g
m
t
S
y
s
t
e
m
"
;
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
p
a
t
r
o
l
ca
r
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
t
r
u
c
k
l
a
p
t
o
p
s
a
n
d
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
p
u
s
h
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
T
O
V
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
;
T
O
V
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
In
t
e
r
g
r
a
p
h
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
4
7
,
4
2
7
5
2
,
5
7
3
5
2
5
,
0
0
0
5
2
,
5
7
3
5
7
7
,
5
7
3
20
1
3
$
3
5
0
K
f
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
a
n
d
$
2
2
7
K
f
o
r
r
e
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
o
f
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
sy
s
t
e
m
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ra
d
i
o
T
o
w
e
r
(
V
a
i
l
R
5
6
)
6
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
,
9
2
3
4
9
,
0
7
7
-
-
R
a
d
i
o
t
o
w
e
r
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
;
n
o
w
c
a
n
c
e
l
l
e
d
In
t
e
r
g
r
a
p
h
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
8
0
,
0
0
0
5
3
,
2
6
4
2
6
,
7
3
6
6
0
,
0
0
0
2
6
,
7
3
6
8
6
,
7
3
6
R
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
T
O
V
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
o
c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
-
a
i
d
e
d
d
i
s
p
a
t
c
h
s
y
s
t
e
m
-
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
a
r
t
e
d
F
a
l
l
'
1
2
Po
l
i
c
e
i
n
-
c
a
r
c
a
m
e
r
a
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
-
-
5
5
,
0
0
0
-
5
5
,
0
0
0
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
m
o
b
i
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
c
a
m
e
r
a
s
i
n
c
a
r
s
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
6
y
e
a
r
s
a
g
o
Po
l
i
c
e
b
r
e
a
t
h
a
l
i
z
e
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
1
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
2
0
1
2
S
t
a
t
e
m
a
n
d
a
t
e
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
1
3
-
y
r
o
l
d
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
;
s
t
a
t
e
wi
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
o
w
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
g
r
a
n
t
-
f
unded
Po
l
i
c
e
r
i
f
l
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
2
1
,
2
5
0
2
0
,
8
4
9
4
0
1
-
-
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
2
1
-
y
e
a
r
o
l
d
r
i
f
l
e
s
(
1
7
u
n
i
t
s
)
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
F
U
N
D
5
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
op
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
U
n
a
u
d
i
t
e
d
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
F
U
N
D
To
t
a
l
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
5
,
1
0
0
,
0
1
9
.
0
0
3
,
7
5
0
,
2
3
2
1
,
3
4
9
,
7
8
7
3
,
2
2
2
,
9
0
0
5
3
7
,
6
4
7
3
,
7
6
0
,
5
4
7
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
o
w
n
A
s
s
e
t
s
CD
O
T
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
1
,
1
5
6
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
4
7
,
3
0
6
8
,
6
9
4
7
0
,
0
0
0
6
3
8
,
6
9
4
7
0
8
,
6
9
4
20
1
3
:
$
6
3
0
K
a
d
d
e
d
f
o
r
S
a
f
e
w
a
y
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
p
e
r
C
D
O
T
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
b
u
d
g
e
t
e
d
t
h
e
n
l
a
t
e
r
re
m
o
v
e
d
;
2
0
1
4
:
V
a
i
l
V
il
l
a
g
e
Va
i
l
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
I
n
f
o
B
o
o
t
h
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
5
5
,
4
3
2
1
4
4
,
5
6
8
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
4
4
,
5
6
8
1
,
0
4
4
,
5
6
8
R
e
m
o
d
e
l
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
a
n
d
s
o
m
e
g
u
e
s
t
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Va
i
l
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
I
n
f
o
B
o
o
t
h
p
u
l
l
i
n
l
a
n
e
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
-
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
-
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
:
P
u
l
l
o
f
f
l
a
n
e
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
V
a
i
l
V
il
l
a
g
e
i
n
f
o
b
o
o
t
h
f
o
r
s
h
o
r
t
t
e
r
m
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
a
n
RV
o
r
l
a
r
g
e
r
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
t
o
p
u
l
l
i
n
f
o
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Li
o
n
s
h
e
a
d
I
n
f
o
B
o
o
t
h
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
2
5
,
0
0
0
1
9
,
8
7
3
5
,
1
2
7
-
-
-
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
o
l
d
L
i
o
n
s
H
e
a
d
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
Gu
e
s
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
L
H
W
e
l
c
o
m
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
(
V
R
A
)
35
4
,
7
0
0
2
6
5
,
6
1
0
8
9
,
0
9
0
-
7
0
,
0
0
0
7
0
,
0
0
0
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
$
2
5
K
f
o
r
f
i
n
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
;
G
u
e
s
t
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
to
w
n
-
w
i
d
e
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
,
b
a
n
n
e
r
s
a
t
V
V
&
L
H
Gu
e
s
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
W
a
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
1
,
5
1
9
,
1
1
0
1
5
6
,
3
8
4
1
,
3
6
2
,
7
2
6
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
3
6
2
,
7
2
6
2
,
4
6
2
,
7
2
6
G
u
e
s
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
/
W
a
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
V
R
A
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Ma
i
n
V
a
i
l
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
7
3
,
4
0
3
2
6
,
5
9
7
8
5
0
,
0
0
0
3
4
1
,
5
9
7
1
,
1
9
1
,
5
9
7
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
r
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
$
2
7
K
u
n
u
s
e
d
f
u
n
d
s
f
r
o
m
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
$
1
0
0
K
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
em
p
l
o
y
e
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
.
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
b
u
d
g
e
t
o
v
e
r
a
g
e
o
f
$2
1
5
K
d
u
e
t
o
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
i
s
s
u
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
En
e
r
g
y
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
,
1
3
3
,
0
2
1
7
6
3
,
4
6
4
3
6
9
,
5
5
7
-
3
6
9
,
5
5
7
3
6
9
,
5
5
7
F
i
n
a
l
b
i
l
l
s
t
o
b
e
p
a
i
d
Fi
r
e
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
3
2
,
0
0
0
3
7
,
4
6
9
(
5
,
4
6
9
)
-
-
-
2
0
1
2
:
$
1
2
K
T
h
e
r
m
a
l
i
m
a
g
e
c
a
m
e
r
a
f
o
r
n
e
w
t
r
u
c
k
;
$
2
0
K
s
e
t
o
f
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
l
a
d
d
e
r
t
r
u
c
k
Ea
s
t
M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
-
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
3
8
0
,
0
0
0
3
6
3
,
7
0
1
1
6
,
2
9
9
-
-
-
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
E
.
M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
b
u
s
p
a
t
h
f
r
o
m
L
a
B
o
t
t
e
g
a
t
o
s
t
a
r
t
o
f
S
o
l
a
r
i
s
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
o
a
d
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
1
0
,
0
0
0
3
,
3
5
0
6
,
6
5
0
2
5
,
0
0
0
-
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ea
s
t
V
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
s
;
$
2
5
K
i
n
2
0
1
3
a
n
d
$
4
2
0
K
i
n
2
0
1
4
f
o
r
s
h
a
r
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
t
h
E
R
W
S
D
o
n
R
o
c
k
l
e
d
g
e
R
d
;
2
0
1
4
a
l
s
o
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
$
2
0
0
K
f
o
r
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
/
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
r
o
a
d
w
o
r
k
(
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
2
0
1
5
)
o
n
C
o
l
u
m
b
i
n
e
,
S
p
r
u
c
e
W
a
y
/
D
r
.
,
St
r
e
a
m
s
i
d
e
,
N
u
g
g
e
t
,
G
l
e
n
L
y
o
n
,
&
W
il
l
o
w
C
t
;
20
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
M
e
a
d
o
w
D
r
.
/
L
n
,
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
,
M
a
i
n
G
o
r
e
,
Ut
e
,
B
l
a
c
k
B
e
a
r
,
S
n
o
w
s
h
o
e
&
G
r
o
u
s
e
L
n
;
V
a
i
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
D
r
i
v
e
p
u
s
h
e
d
t
o
2
0
1
8
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
r
i
d
g
e
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
1
,
4
1
1
,
8
1
5
9
6
5
,
9
2
6
4
4
5
,
8
8
9
-
4
4
5
,
8
8
9
4
4
5
,
8
8
9
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
f
i
n
i
s
h
M
a
t
t
e
r
h
o
r
n
B
r
i
d
g
e
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
(
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
g
r
a
n
t
)
;
N
u
g
g
e
t
L
a
n
e
a
n
d
Br
i
d
g
e
R
d
b
r
i
d
g
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
n
2
0
1
3
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
2
0
1
4
t
o
c
o
i
n
c
i
d
e
w
i
t
h
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
g
r
a
n
t
s
.
Ra
d
i
o
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
p
u
b
.
w
o
r
k
s
,
pu
b
.
s
a
f
e
t
y
)
48
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
3
9
1
1
7
,
6
0
9
-
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
2
0
0
8
r
a
d
i
o
s
f
o
r
P
W
,
F
i
r
e
,
P
D
Hy
b
r
i
d
B
u
s
B
a
t
t
e
r
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
5
5
,
0
0
0
-
5
5
,
0
0
0
-
5
5
,
0
0
0
5
5
,
0
0
0
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
1
i
n
2
0
1
3
;
7
i
n
2
0
1
4
;
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
l
i
f
e
o
f
6
y
e
a
r
s
Re
p
l
a
c
e
B
u
s
e
s
1
,
2
4
5
,
9
7
8
1
,
1
6
8
,
4
0
5
7
7
,
5
7
3
-
2
0
,
2
8
2
2
0
,
2
8
2
2
0
1
2
:
2
H
y
b
r
i
d
b
u
s
e
s
;
r
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
f
i
n
a
l
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
b
il
l
s
Ti
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
L
e
g
a
l
/
Z
o
n
i
n
g
1
7
,
3
1
5
1
7
,
3
1
5
-
-
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
5
,
0
0
0
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
a
n
d
l
e
g
a
l
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
i
f
t
h
e
t
o
w
n
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
e
x
p
l
o
r
i
n
g
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
i
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
To
t
a
l
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
9,
0
3
7
,
9
3
9
6
,
1
6
8
,
0
2
7
2
,
8
6
9
,
9
1
2
2
,
9
4
5
,
0
0
0
3
,
7
2
3
,
3
1
5
6
,
6
6
8
,
3
1
5
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
-
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
Re
s
e
r
v
e
f
o
r
u
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ne
w
A
s
s
e
t
s
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
8
8
0
,
2
0
9
4
0
6
,
2
9
7
4
7
3
,
9
1
2
-
5
,
0
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
o
f
f
i
n
a
l
b
i
l
l
s
We
l
c
o
m
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
(
V
R
A
)
9
2
3
,
4
4
4
8
2
8
,
9
0
8
9
4
,
5
3
6
-
9
4
,
5
3
6
9
4
,
5
3
6
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
A
D
A
p
u
s
h
b
u
t
t
o
n
s
a
t
e
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
s
(
$
2
0
K
)
;
r
e
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
h
a
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
/
ro
a
d
w
a
y
i
c
i
n
g
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
Ea
s
t
L
i
o
n
s
H
e
a
d
P
o
r
t
a
l
(
V
R
A
)
2
,
1
1
6
,
2
8
9
1
,
6
5
2
,
7
2
8
4
6
3
,
5
6
1
-
4
6
3
,
5
6
1
4
6
3
,
5
6
1
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
f
i
n
a
l
b
il
l
s
;
R
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
i
t
e
m
s
i
n
c
l
ud
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
s
p
r
i
n
g
;
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
t
o
a
p
a
v
e
r
a
r
e
a
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
ho
l
d
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
;
F
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
V
a
i
l
R
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
(
E
a
s
t
L
H
C
i
r
c
l
e
)
We
s
t
L
i
o
n
s
H
e
a
d
P
o
r
t
a
l
(
V
R
A
)
7
7
2
,
5
0
0
6
4
2
,
9
5
6
1
2
9
,
5
4
4
-
1
2
9
,
5
4
4
1
2
9
,
5
4
4
R
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
;
F
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
V
a
i
l
R
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
(
C
o
n
c
e
r
t
H
a
l
l
P
l
a
z
a
)
Li
b
r
a
r
y
R
e
m
o
d
e
l
(
V
R
A
)
2
,
2
5
3
,
7
2
8
1
,
9
5
5
,
2
3
1
2
9
8
,
4
9
7
-
2
9
8
,
4
9
7
2
9
8
,
4
9
7
R
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
f
i
n
i
s
h
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
/
c
o
v
e
r
f
i
n
a
l
b
il
l
s
;
F
un
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
V
a
i
l
R
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
(
s
e
e
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
b
e
l
o
w
)
Su
n
d
i
a
l
P
l
a
z
a
(
V
R
A
)
8
5
0
,
0
0
0
9
,
4
3
2
8
4
0
,
5
6
8
-
8
4
0
,
5
6
8
8
4
0
,
5
6
8
F
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Si
m
b
a
R
u
n
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
(
V
R
A
)
-
-
-
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
-
f
un
d
e
d
b
y
V
R
A
;
C
D
O
T
s
h
a
r
i
n
g
5
0
%
o
f
c
o
s
t
s
(
s
e
e
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
b
o
v
e
)
Li
o
n
s
h
e
a
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
E
n
t
r
y
(
V
R
A
)
-
-
-
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Im
p
r
o
v
e
e
n
t
r
y
a
r
e
a
i
n
t
o
L
H
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
b
o
o
t
h
a
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
t
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
2
0
1
5
W
o
r
l
d
C
h
a
m
p
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
;
20
1
3
d
e
s
i
g
n
;
2
0
1
4
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
R
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
d
b
y
V
R
A
(
s
e
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
b
e
l
o
w
)
We
s
t
V
a
i
l
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
7
,
5
0
0
7
,
5
0
0
-
-
-
-
2
0
1
2
:
F
i
n
a
l
b
il
l
s
f
o
r
W
e
s
t
V
a
i
l
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Bu
y
-
d
o
w
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
4
0
2
,
1
1
8
4
0
2
,
1
1
8
-
4
0
2
,
1
1
8
4
0
2
,
1
1
8
C
a
r
r
y
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
;
$1
5
0
K
i
n
2
0
1
2
u
s
e
d
f
o
r
t
w
o
E
H
U
'
s
a
t
t
h
e
M
a
i
n
V
a
i
l
F
.
S
.
Bu
y
-
d
o
w
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
P
a
y
-
i
n
-
L
i
e
u
5
3
7
,
8
0
3
5
3
7
,
8
0
3
-
6
0
0
,
4
2
0
6
0
0
,
4
2
0
Ca
r
r
y
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
o
f
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
:
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
e
d
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
b
y
P
a
y
-
i
n
-
L
i
e
u
f
e
e
s
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
;
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
2
I-
7
0
N
o
i
s
e
3
5
0
,
1
8
3
1
9
6
,
1
7
5
1
5
4
,
0
0
8
-
-
-
2
0
1
2
:
u
t
il
i
t
y
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
B
a
l
d
M
ou
n
t
a
i
n
b
e
r
m
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
U
t
il
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
12
1
,
2
0
0
7
7
,
8
5
1
4
3
,
3
4
9
-
-
-
20
1
2
:
E
a
s
t
V
a
i
l
o
n
B
i
g
h
o
r
n
R
d
a
n
d
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
t
o
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
;
R
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
h
o
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
s
t
o
t
a
l
i
n
g
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
($
5
K
f
r
o
m
E
a
s
t
V
a
i
l
a
n
d
$
5
0
K
f
r
o
m
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
n
e
a
r
g
o
l
f
c
o
u
r
s
e
)
,
V
a
i
l
R
e
c
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(
$
1
5
K
)
a
n
d
H
o
l
y
C
r
o
s
s
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
fu
n
d
i
n
g
$
4
3
,
0
0
0
f
o
r
E
a
s
t
V
a
i
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
To
t
a
l
N
e
w
A
s
s
e
t
s
:
9
,
2
1
4
,
9
7
4
5
,
7
7
7
,
0
7
8
3
,
4
3
7
,
8
9
6
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
,
8
3
4
,
2
4
5
3
,
4
3
4
,
2
4
5
To
t
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
b
e
f
o
r
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
2
3
,
3
5
2
,
9
3
2
1
5
,
6
9
5
,
3
3
7
7
,
6
5
7
,
5
9
5
6
,
7
6
7
,
9
0
0
7
,
0
9
5
,
2
0
7
1
3
,
8
6
3
,
1
0
7
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
O
u
t
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
B
o
n
d
s
2
,
0
8
8
,
3
4
6
2
,
0
8
8
,
3
4
7
(
1
)
-
-
-
D
e
b
t
p
a
i
d
o
f
f
i
n
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
,
2
0
1
2
Ti
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
G
u
a
r
a
n
t
e
e
9
2
5
,
0
0
0
-
9
2
5
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
d
e
b
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
g
u
a
r
a
n
t
e
e
-
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
R
d
e
b
t
.
N
o
l
o
n
g
e
r
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
w
i
t
h
p
a
y
o
f
f
o
f
d
e
b
t
i
n
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
,
2013
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
:
3
,
0
1
3
,
3
4
6
2
,
0
8
8
,
3
4
7
9
2
4
,
9
9
9
-
-
-
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
2
6
,
3
6
6
,
2
7
8
1
7
,
7
8
3
,
6
8
4
8
,
5
8
2
,
5
9
4
6
,
7
6
7
,
9
0
0
7
,
0
9
5
,
2
0
7
1
3
,
8
6
3
,
1
0
7
Ot
h
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
U
s
e
s
)
Lo
a
n
t
o
T
i
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
(
T
R
A
H
C
)
-
-
(
8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
-
(
8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
L
o
a
n
t
o
T
i
m
b
e
r
R
i
d
g
e
A
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
-
f
i
n
a
n
c
e
d
e
b
t
6
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
op
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
U
n
a
u
d
i
t
e
d
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
F
U
N
D
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
V
a
i
l
R
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
9
,
0
3
5
,
5
7
4
5
,
3
5
4
,
8
6
4
3
,
6
8
0
,
7
1
0
1
,
2
1
0
,
0
0
0
3
,
6
8
0
,
7
1
0
4
,
8
9
0
,
7
1
0
20
1
2
b
u
d
g
e
t
:
L
H
P
o
r
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
2
.
9
M
,
S
u
n
d
i
a
l
p
l
a
z
a
$
8
5
0
K
,
$
2
.
0
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
r
e
m
o
d
e
l
,
C
D
O
T
-
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
$
1
0
2
K
i
n
L
H
,
L
H
P
k
g
m
t
c
$
3
6
5
K
,
L
H
W
e
l
c
o
m
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
$
1
.
1
M
,
G
u
e
s
t
S
vc
s
$
7
1
0
K
;
E
nergy enhancements
$9
5
3
K
;
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
5
2
,
0
0
0
5
2
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
G
F
f
r
o
m
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
g
r
a
n
t
s
f
o
r
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
o
o
m
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
D
i
s
p
a
t
c
h
F
u
n
d
1
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
0
,
0
0
0
-
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
D
i
s
p
a
t
c
h
f
o
r
R
a
d
i
o
T
o
w
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
(
U
n
d
e
r
)
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(
7
,
0
0
1
,
1
0
9
)
(
1
,
0
2
1
,
6
3
1
)
5
,
9
7
9
,
4
7
8
(
4
,
2
0
1
,
8
5
1
)
(
3
,
3
8
4
,
4
9
7
)
(
7
,
5
8
6
,
3
4
8
)
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
1
8
,
4
4
8
,
7
3
9
1
8
,
4
4
8
,
7
3
9
1
8
,
4
4
8
,
7
3
9
11
,
4
4
7
,
6
3
0
5
,
9
7
9
,
4
7
8
1
7
,
4
2
7
,
1
0
8
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
11
,
4
4
7
,
6
3
0
17
,
4
2
7
,
1
0
8
2
4
,
4
2
8
,
2
1
6
.
8
9
7
,
2
4
5
,
7
7
9
1
8
,
4
4
8
,
7
3
9
9
,
8
4
0
,
7
6
0
*P
r
o
m
i
s
s
o
r
y
n
o
t
e
d
u
e
f
r
o
m
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
s
'
G
a
r
d
e
n
of
L
e
a
n
i
n
g
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
e
n
d
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
-
no
t
s
p
e
n
d
a
b
l
e
5
,
0
0
0
-
-
P
a
i
d
o
f
f
d
u
r
i
n
g
2
0
1
3
7
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
U
n
a
u
d
i
t
e
d
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
Re
a
l
E
s
t
a
t
e
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
T
a
x
3
,
8
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
4
5
1
,
4
0
9
$
1
,
6
1
6
,
4
0
9
$
4
,
6
7
1
,
0
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
6
7
1
,
0
0
0
$
Fl
a
t
w
i
t
h
2
0
1
2
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
e
d
;
B
a
s
e
s
a
l
e
s
m
a
k
e
u
p
7
5
%
o
f
t
o
t
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
Go
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
L
e
a
s
e
1
2
6
,
8
8
8
1
2
6
,
7
6
8
(
1
2
0
)
1
2
9
,
4
2
6
1
2
9
,
4
2
6
An
n
u
a
l
l
e
a
s
e
p
a
y
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
V
a
i
l
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
D
i
s
t
r
i
ct
2
%
a
n
n
u
a
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
-
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
e
d
t
o
"
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
"
(
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
l
i
s
t
e
d
b
e
l
o
w
)
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
e
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
,
0
0
0
2
6
,
9
6
1
6
,
9
6
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
K
L
o
t
t
e
r
y
f
u
n
d
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
R
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
,
1
8
6
,
6
6
0
2
3
,
8
8
6
(
1
,
1
6
2
,
7
7
4
)
-
1
,
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
.
1
6
5
M
V
R
D
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
i
t
y
F
e
e
s
1
0
,
0
0
0
4
1
,
1
6
8
3
1
,
1
6
8
1
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
Ea
r
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
O
t
h
e
r
6
8
,
0
0
0
1
3
1
,
2
0
4
6
3
,
2
0
4
4
6
,
7
8
9
4
6
,
7
8
9
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
5
,
2
4
6
,
5
4
8
5
,
8
0
1
,
3
9
6
5
5
4
,
8
4
8
4
,
8
7
7
,
2
1
5
1
,
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
6
,
0
4
2
,
2
1
5
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
T
o
w
n
A
s
s
e
t
s
An
n
u
a
l
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
1
,
3
5
0
,
1
4
0
1
,
2
2
5
,
8
7
1
1
2
4
,
2
6
9
1
,
3
7
3
,
8
5
4
-
1
,
3
7
3
,
8
5
4
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
p
a
t
h
,
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
,
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
g
m
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
F
e
e
t
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
(
5
%
)
1
9
1
,
7
5
0
2
2
7
,
8
5
1
(
3
6
,
1
0
1
)
2
3
3
,
5
5
0
-
2
3
3
,
5
5
0
5
%
o
f
R
E
T
T
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
-
f
e
e
r
e
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
f
o
r
a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
e
e
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
9
0
,
0
0
0
4
7
,
8
4
4
4
2
,
1
5
6
6
5
,
0
0
0
2
5
,
0
0
0
9
0
,
0
0
0
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
A
s
p
e
n
t
r
e
e
s
c
a
l
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
V
a
i
l
V
il
l
a
g
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
m
o
v
e
ap
p
r
o
x
.
1
0
0
a
s
p
e
n
s
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
n
t
;
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
t
r
e
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
t
o
w
n
(
s
p
r
a
y
i
n
g
,
re
m
o
v
i
n
g
,
n
e
w
t
r
e
e
s
)
Fo
r
e
s
t
H
e
a
l
t
h
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
1
9
5
,
0
0
0
1
8
2
,
2
9
0
1
2
,
7
1
0
1
9
5
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
7
1
0
2
0
7
,
7
1
0
Pi
n
e
b
e
e
t
l
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
/
f
o
r
e
s
t
s
e
r
v
ic
e
(
C
r
e
w
o
f
6
d
u
r
i
n
g
s
p
r
i
n
g
/
s
u
m
m
e
r
m
o
n
t
h
s
)
;
R
e
-
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
$
1
2
K
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
re
e
r
a
d
i
o
s
p
l
u
s
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
St
r
e
e
t
F
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
4
,
8
7
9
1
2
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
-
7
5
,
0
0
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
r
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
b
i
k
e
r
a
c
k
s
Al
p
i
n
e
G
a
r
d
e
n
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
8
5
,
6
2
0
8
5
,
6
2
0
(
0
)
6
5
,
6
2
0
-
6
5
,
6
2
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
B
e
t
t
y
F
o
r
d
A
l
p
i
n
e
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
Ea
g
l
e
R
i
v
e
r
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
6
2
,
0
0
0
6
2
,
5
5
0
(
5
5
0
)
6
2
,
0
0
0
-
6
2
,
0
0
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
E
a
g
l
e
R
i
v
e
r
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
-
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
9
2
,
6
5
7
8
6
,
2
0
5
6
,
4
5
2
9
4
,
0
0
5
-
9
4
,
0
0
5
A
r
t
I
n
P
u
b
l
i
c
P
l
a
c
e
s
s
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
27
1
,
6
6
0
2
6
6
,
0
0
3
5
,
6
5
7
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
5
,
6
5
7
2
5
5
,
6
5
7
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
$
5
.
6
K
f
o
r
a
p
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
s
o
l
a
r
t
r
ai
l
e
r
o
r
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
2
b
u
t
n
o
t
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
u
n
t
i
l
2
0
1
3
;
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
To
t
a
l
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
2
,
3
6
3
,
8
2
7
2
,
2
0
9
,
1
1
3
1
5
4
,
7
1
4
2
,
4
1
4
,
0
2
9
4
3
,
3
6
7
2
,
4
5
7
,
3
9
6
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
o
w
n
A
s
s
e
t
s
Re
c
.
P
a
t
h
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
M
a
i
n
t
9
3
,
3
9
5
7
7
,
2
7
5
1
6
,
1
2
0
9
8
,
3
3
9
-
9
8
,
3
3
9
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
t
o
w
n
'
s
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
p
a
t
h
s
y
s
t
e
m
Pa
r
k
/
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
8
5
,
0
0
0
7
8
,
0
7
7
6
,
9
2
3
8
9
,
0
0
0
-
8
9
,
0
0
0
An
n
u
a
l
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
i
t
e
m
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
r
e
f
u
r
b
i
s
h
i
n
g
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
i
n
g
b
e
a
r
-
pr
o
o
f
t
r
a
s
h
c
a
n
s
,
p
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
/
s
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
o
f
p
l
a
y
s
t
r
u
ct
u
r
e
s
,
p
i
c
n
i
c
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
/
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
,
a
n
d
f
e
n
c
e
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Fl
o
o
d
I
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
1
,
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
1
1
9
,
1
6
8
9
3
0
,
8
3
2
-
9
3
0
,
8
3
2
9
3
0
,
8
3
2
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
D
o
w
d
J
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
/
B
o
o
t
h
C
r
ee
k
w
o
r
k
;
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
t
o
c
u
l
v
e
r
t
s
,
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
,
a
n
d
pr
e
v
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
St
r
e
a
m
b
a
n
k
/
t
r
a
c
t
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
9
5
0
,
0
0
0
R
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
d
o
l
l
a
r
s
;
W
a
i
t
i
n
g
f
o
r
w
a
t
e
r
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
t
u
d
y
o
n
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Tr
a
i
l
h
e
a
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
5
0
,
0
0
0
-
5
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
r
a
i
l
h
e
a
d
s
AD
A
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
w
/
V
R
D
1
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
Sh
a
r
e
d
c
o
s
t
s
w
i
t
h
V
R
D
-
A
D
A
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
t
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
a
c
il
i
t
i
e
s
;
n
e
w
A
D
A
r
egulations went into effect
20
1
1
;
N
e
e
d
t
o
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
f
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
s
a
t
a
l
l
p
a
r
k
s
(
$
2
K
e
a
c
h
)
Fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
B
i
k
e
L
a
n
e
s
/
T
r
a
i
l
s
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
7
0
1
,
9
8
5
4
4
8
,
0
1
5
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
8
8
,
0
1
5
6
8
8
,
0
1
5
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
$
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
o
f
s
a
v
i
n
g
s
i
n
2
0
1
2
f
o
r
s
t
r
e
a
m
w
a
l
k
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
;
R
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
r
e
-
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
r
o
a
d
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
a
c
c
e
l
e
r
a
t
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
C
D
O
T
'
s
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
f
o
r
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
r
o
a
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
;
2
0
1
3
b
u
d
g
e
t
f
o
r
D
o
n
o
v
a
n
t
o
W
e
s
t
V
a
i
l
r
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
Re
d
S
a
n
d
s
t
o
n
e
P
a
r
k
-
P
e
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
p
l
a
n
1
9
7
,
6
3
0
1
6
1
,
8
8
5
3
5
,
7
4
5
-
-
-
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
e
r
s
a
f
e
t
y
p
l
a
n
;
2
0
y
e
a
r
s
o
l
d
Fo
r
d
P
a
r
k
P
o
r
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
-
-
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
TO
V
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
s
i
x
p
o
r
t
a
l
s
i
n
t
o
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
;
M
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
V
a
i
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
Fo
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
;
2
0
1
3
f
o
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
/
a
r
t
3
3
5
,
8
7
8
3
2
,
6
1
8
3
0
3
,
2
6
0
8
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
8
,
0
2
7
3
8
8
,
0
2
7
To
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
c
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
s
,
a
r
t
w
o
r
k
,
ar
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
e
v
e
n
t
s
;
r
e
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
is
r
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
d
e
a
c
h
y
e
a
r
t
o
ac
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
e
e
n
o
u
g
h
f
u
n
d
s
;
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
b
u
d
g
e
t
f
o
r
a
n
n
u
a
l
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
m
a
n
h
o
l
e
c
o
v
e
r
&
j
e
w
e
l
e
r
y
sa
l
e
s
,
a
n
d
p
o
s
t
e
r
s
a
l
e
s
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
2
0
1
2
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
-
W
i
n
t
e
r
f
e
s
t
3
3
,
4
9
4
8
,
3
5
4
2
5
,
1
4
0
-
2
7
,
7
9
0
2
7
,
7
9
0
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
d
e
f
o
r
W
i
n
t
e
r
f
e
s
t
e
v
e
n
t
($
2
,
6
5
0
i
n
2
0
1
2
)
;
R
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
;
(a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
e
v
e
n
t
i
s
$
2
5
K
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
)
To
t
a
l
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
3
,
2
0
5
,
3
9
7
1
,
1
8
9
,
3
6
3
2
,
0
1
6
,
0
3
4
1
,
7
1
7
,
3
3
9
1
,
5
5
4
,
6
6
4
3
,
2
7
2
,
0
0
3
VR
D
-
M
a
n
a
g
e
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
-
-
-
1
2
9
,
4
2
6
-
1
2
9
,
4
2
6
F
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
e
a
s
e
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
p
a
i
d
b
y
V
a
i
l
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Go
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
-
O
t
h
e
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
5
1
,
6
3
5
9
1
,
7
0
7
5
9
,
9
2
8
4
,
4
8
9
5
9
,
9
2
8
6
4
,
4
1
7
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
s
h
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
g
o
l
f
c
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
;
s
e
w
e
r
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
t
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
RE
A
L
E
S
T
A
T
E
T
R
A
N
S
F
E
R
T
A
X
F
U
N
D
8
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
U
n
a
u
d
i
t
e
d
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
RE
A
L
E
S
T
A
T
E
T
R
A
N
S
F
E
R
T
A
X
F
U
N
D
Do
b
s
o
n
I
c
e
A
r
e
n
a
4
1
6
,
7
7
4
1
5
8
,
2
5
7
2
5
8
,
5
1
7
3
,
4
8
0
6
5
,
0
0
0
6
8
,
4
8
0
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
b
o
i
l
e
r
s
,
r
e
f
u
r
b
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
he
c
o
o
l
i
n
g
t
o
w
e
r
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
c
e
;
h
e
a
t
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
a
n
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Fo
r
d
P
a
r
k
/
T
e
n
n
i
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4
2
8
,
9
1
0
1
2
,
1
9
9
4
1
6
,
7
1
1
2
,
7
6
8
-
2
,
7
6
8
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
d
d
o
l
l
a
r
s
t
o
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
F
i
e
l
d
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
Gy
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
1
,
9
7
8
2
7
5
1
,
7
0
3
2
,
8
4
8
-
2
,
8
4
8
W
a
i
t
i
n
g
o
n
e
n
e
r
g
y
a
u
d
i
t
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
i
n
s
t
a
ll
i
n
g
c
o
o
l
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
Na
t
u
r
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
1
0
,
6
4
6
-
1
0
,
6
4
6
-
1
0
,
6
4
6
1
0
,
6
4
6
2
0
1
3
w
o
o
d
o
p
e
n
r
a
i
l
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
V
R
D
-
M
a
n
a
g
e
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
1
,
0
0
9
,
9
4
3
2
6
2
,
4
3
8
7
4
7
,
5
0
5
1
4
3
,
0
1
1
1
3
5
,
5
7
4
2
7
8
,
5
8
5
Ne
w
A
s
s
e
t
s
Go
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
(
C
C
F
)
6
,
7
1
2
,
7
6
1
3
2
9
,
0
2
2
6
,
3
8
3
,
7
3
9
-
6
,
3
8
3
,
7
3
9
6
,
3
8
3
,
7
3
9
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
T
o
t
a
l
i
n
c
l
ud
e
s
(
f
r
o
m
2
0
1
2
)
$
1
.
1
5
M
r
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
V
R
D
,
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
F
u
n
d
s
$
5
0
4
K
an
d
C
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
s
o
f
$
3
.
8
M
(
T
o
t
a
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
s
t
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
a
t
$
6
.
8
M
)
Fo
r
d
P
a
r
k
F
i
e
l
d
s
(
C
C
F
)
6
,
2
9
7
,
3
4
0
2
,
6
5
3
,
2
6
9
3
,
6
4
4
,
0
7
1
-
4
,
4
2
0
,
7
8
2
4
,
4
2
0
,
7
8
2
Re
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
p
l
u
s
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
o
f
$3
6
0
K
f
r
o
m
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
B
i
k
e
L
a
n
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
f
o
r
re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
(
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
g
r
a
d
e
f
r
o
m
a
m
a
x
o
f
1
7
%
t
o
a
ma
x
o
f
6
-
7
%
)
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
o
f
$
4
1
6
K
f
r
o
m
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
/
T
e
n
n
i
s
b
u
d
g
e
t
Pu
b
l
i
c
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
3
7
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
7
3
2
3
6
8
,
2
6
8
-
3
6
8
,
2
6
8
3
6
8
,
2
6
8
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
a
t
l
o
w
e
r
b
e
n
c
h
o
f
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
To
t
a
l
N
e
w
A
s
s
e
t
s
:
1
3
,
3
8
0
,
1
0
1
2
,
9
8
4
,
0
2
3
1
0
,
3
9
6
,
0
7
8
-
1
1
,
1
7
2
,
7
8
9
1
1
,
1
7
2
,
7
8
9
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
1
9
,
9
5
9
,
2
6
8
6
,
6
4
4
,
9
3
7
1
3
,
3
1
4
,
3
3
1
4
,
2
7
4
,
3
7
9
1
2
,
9
0
6
,
3
9
3
1
7
,
1
8
0
,
7
7
2
Ot
h
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
U
s
e
s
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
C
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
F
u
n
d
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
-
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
-
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
C
o
n
f
C
e
n
t
e
r
F
u
n
d
s
f
o
r
G
o
l
f
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
($
3
.
8
M
)
a
n
d
F
o
r
d
P
a
r
k
F
i
e
l
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
$
3
.
5
M
)
,
ne
t
o
f
$
5
1
5
K
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
1
f
o
r
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
/
d
e
s
i
g
n
Re
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
(
U
n
d
e
r
)
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(
7
,
9
2
7
,
7
2
0
)
(
8
4
3
,
5
4
1
)
7
,
0
8
4
,
1
7
9
6
0
2
,
8
3
6
(
4
,
9
5
6
,
3
9
3
)
(
4
,
3
5
3
,
5
5
7
)
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
1
7
,
2
8
5
,
6
0
5
1
7
,
2
8
5
,
6
0
5
9
,
3
5
7
,
8
8
6
7
,
0
8
4
,
1
7
9
1
6
,
4
4
2
,
0
6
4
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
9
,
3
5
7
,
8
8
5
$
1
6
,
4
4
2
,
0
6
4
$
9
,
9
6
0
,
7
2
2
$
1
2
,
0
8
8
,
5
0
7
$
9
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
A
c
t
u
a
l
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Ea
r
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
4
6
,
8
0
0
4
6
,
8
9
0
9
0
1
,
2
0
0
-
1
,
2
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
46
,
8
0
0
4
6
,
8
9
0
9
0
1
,
2
0
0
-
1
,
2
0
0
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
Fo
r
d
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
2
5
7
,
3
0
6
8
4
2
,
6
9
4
-
8
4
2
,
6
9
4
8
4
2
,
6
9
4
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
V
V
F
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
2,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
2
5
7
,
3
0
6
8
4
2
,
6
9
4
-
8
4
2
,
6
9
4
8
4
2
,
6
9
4
Ot
h
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
U
s
e
s
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
R
E
T
T
F
u
n
d
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
-
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
-
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
6
,
7
8
5
,
0
0
0
No
C
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
F
u
n
d
s
u
s
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
2
t
o
w
a
r
d
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
;
R
e
-
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
Re
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
(
U
n
d
e
r
)
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(8
,
8
3
8
,
2
0
0
)
(
1
,
2
1
0
,
4
1
6
)
7
,
6
2
7
,
7
8
4
1
,
2
0
0
(
7
,
6
2
7
,
6
9
4
)
(
7
,
6
2
6
,
4
9
4
)
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
8
,
9
1
5
,
7
9
1
8
,
9
1
5
,
7
9
1
7
7
,
5
9
1
7
,
6
2
7
,
7
8
4
7
,
7
0
5
,
3
7
5
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
7
7
,
5
9
1
$
7
,
7
0
5
,
3
7
5
$
7
8
,
7
9
1
$
7
8
,
8
8
1
$
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
CO
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
F
U
N
D
10
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
A
c
t
u
a
l
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
E9
1
1
B
o
a
r
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
74
2
,
2
5
6
$
7
4
4
,
1
5
6
$
1
,
9
0
0
$
8
0
1
,
6
0
3
$
-
$
8
0
1
,
6
0
3
$
In
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
1
,
1
7
7
,
0
6
1
1
,
1
7
1
,
0
6
2
(
5
,
9
9
9
)
1
,
1
2
7
,
3
3
8
-
1
,
1
2
7
,
3
3
8
To
w
n
o
f
V
a
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
C
h
a
r
g
e
5
7
5
,
7
0
6
5
7
2
,
7
0
6
(
3
,
0
0
0
)
5
6
9
,
1
9
3
-
5
6
9
,
1
9
3
Ea
r
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
&
O
t
h
e
r
7
,
5
0
0
3
,
2
1
9
(
4
,
2
8
1
)
1
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2,
5
0
2
,
5
2
3
2
,
4
9
1
,
1
4
3
(
1
1
,
3
8
0
)
2
,
5
0
8
,
1
3
4
-
2
,
5
0
8
,
1
3
4
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Sa
l
a
r
i
e
s
&
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
1,
8
8
1
,
2
0
4
1
,
7
0
7
,
1
3
7
1
7
4
,
0
6
7
1
,
9
4
7
,
8
8
7
-
1
,
9
4
7
,
8
8
7
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
,
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
&
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
5
1
4
,
0
0
1
5
0
9
,
7
4
4
4
,
2
5
7
5
4
6
,
3
8
8
-
5
4
6
,
3
8
8
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
O
u
t
l
a
y
4
3
3
,
1
5
9
2
7
6
,
0
1
4
1
5
7
,
1
4
6
2
0
,
0
0
0
1
5
7
,
1
4
6
1
7
7
,
1
4
6
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
g
r
a
p
h
s
y
s
t
e
m
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
2,
8
2
8
,
3
6
4
2
,
4
9
2
,
8
9
5
3
3
5
,
4
6
9
2
,
5
1
4
,
2
7
5
1
5
7
,
1
4
6
2
,
6
7
1
,
4
2
1
Re
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
(
U
n
d
e
r
)
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(
3
2
5
,
8
4
1
)
(
1
,
7
5
2
)
3
2
4
,
0
8
9
(
6
,
1
4
1
)
(
1
5
7
,
1
4
6
)
(
1
6
3
,
2
8
7
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
F
u
n
d
10
,
0
0
0
-
1
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
C
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
r
a
d
i
o
t
o
w
e
r
(
c
a
n
c
e
l
l
e
d
)
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
7
9
9
,
4
1
9
7
9
9
,
4
1
9
4
6
3
,
5
7
8
3
2
4
,
0
8
9
7
9
7
,
6
6
7
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
46
3
,
5
7
8
$
7
9
7
,
6
6
7
$
3
3
4
,
0
8
9
$
4
5
7
,
4
3
7
$
1
6
6
,
9
4
3
$
6
3
4
,
3
8
0
$
T
O
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
,
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
D
I
S
P
A
T
C
H
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
F
U
N
D
11
4/2/2013
20
1
3
2
0
1
3
20
1
2
2
0
1
2
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
1
s
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Am
e
n
d
e
d
A
c
t
u
a
l
F
a
v
/
(
U
n
f
a
v
)
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
Ame
n
d
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
To
w
n
o
f
V
a
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
C
h
a
r
g
e
2,
8
9
2
,
3
6
2
$
2
,
7
5
1
,
4
0
9
$
(
1
4
0
,
9
5
3
)
$
2
,
9
3
4
,
7
8
0
$
-
$
2
,
9
3
4
,
7
8
0
$
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
b
a
c
k
t
o
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
R
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
&
O
t
h
e
r
80
,
0
0
0
8
6
,
5
0
8
6
,
5
0
8
-
-
-
Ea
r
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
10
,
3
2
4
1
0
,
9
9
3
6
6
9
1
6
,
0
8
4
-
1
6
,
0
8
4
Equi
pme
n
t
S
a
l
e
s
a
n
d
T
r
a
d
e
-
i
n
s
16
0
,
5
0
0
1
7
4
,
8
4
8
1
4
,
3
4
8
1
1
1
,
9
2
0
-
1
1
1
,
9
2
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
3
,
1
4
3
,
1
8
6
3
,
0
2
3
,
7
5
8
(
1
1
9
,
4
2
8
)
3
,
0
6
2
,
7
8
4
-
3
,
0
6
2
,
7
8
4
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Sa
l
a
r
i
e
s
&
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
99
6
,
0
1
6
9
4
8
,
9
6
3
4
7
,
0
5
3
1
,
0
1
6
,
3
9
6
-
1,
0
1
6
,
3
9
6
no
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
i
n
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
l
e
v
e
l
s
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
,
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
&
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
1,
4
9
2
,
0
9
5
1
,
4
2
0
,
6
4
6
7
1
,
4
4
9
1
,
4
3
4
,
9
4
8
-
1,
4
3
4
,
9
4
8
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
O
u
t
l
a
y
8
0
9
,
1
4
4
6
1
4
,
1
8
8
1
9
4
,
9
5
6
6
4
8
,
7
0
0
1
8
0
,
2
0
0
8
2
8
,
9
0
0
Vo
l
v
o
t
r
u
c
k
a
n
d
f
l
a
t
b
e
d
p
i
c
k
u
p
w
e
r
e
o
r
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
2
,
b
u
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
3
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
3
,
2
9
7
,
2
5
5
2
,
9
8
3
,
7
9
6
3
1
3
,
4
5
9
3
,
1
0
0
,
0
4
4
1
8
0
,
2
0
0
3
,
2
8
0
,
2
4
4
Re
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
(
U
n
d
e
r
)
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(1
5
4
,
0
6
9
)
1
5
4
,
0
6
9
(
3
7
,
2
6
0
)
(
2
1
7
,
4
6
0
)
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
2
,
2
7
0
,
2
1
3
2
,
2
7
0
,
2
1
3
2
,
1
1
6
,
1
4
4
2
,
1
1
6
,
1
4
4
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
2,
1
1
6
,
1
4
4
$
2
,
2
7
0
,
2
1
3
$
1
5
4
,
0
6
9
$
2
,
0
7
8
,
8
8
4
$
-
$
1
,
8
9
8
,
6
8
4
$
TO
W
N
O
F
V
A
I
L
2
0
1
3
B
U
D
G
E
T
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
,
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
A
N
D
C
H
A
N
G
E
S
I
N
F
U
N
D
B
A
L
A
N
C
E
HE
A
V
Y
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
F
U
N
D
12
4/2/2013
To: TOV Council; Stan Zemler, Town Manager
From: Mark Miller, Fire Chief
Date: 04/02/13
Subject: Supplemental budget - fire station 2 renovation
The renovation of the Main Vail fire station 2 will be complete in approximately four weeks. Due
to numerous unforeseen issues, the project will be over budget by approximately $215,000. The
initial overage at the first reading on March 19th was $190,000, but due to a clerical error by the
contractor (they gave us double credit for value engineering items), we have had to adjust the
overall supplemental number. We are continuing to negotiate a few change orders in hopes we
can reduce the final number by the end of project.
The demolition of the existing structure at Vail Fire Station 2 uncovered a multitude of structural
issues which could not have been foreseen to the full extent by the design team or contractor -
despite due diligence exploratory demolition.
Some of the issues uncovered showed that the existing structure was deficient and, in some
cases, there was a significant risk of failure of the structure. All of these unforeseen issues had
to be corrected to bring the building into compliance with the current International Building
Code. It is my opinion that the design team, owners’ representatives and the contractor made
informed, prudent, and frugal decisions regarding rectifying these conditions in the most cost
effective way, while providing long performing systems to the project. The budget overages are
primarily due to circumstances related to structural issues, including:
None of the existing concrete Masonry Block walls had sufficient reinforcing and grouting
as required by the building code. Some of these walls were carrying floor loads and roof
loads and it is fortunate that the walls had not failed prior to this repair. The repair
required the shoring of the existing structure to stabilize it while the new work was
completed.
The second floor system was cantilevered over the first floor wall on the west side of the
building. This cantilever carried the roof load above. This floor system had not been
designed to carry the roof load and, again, failure of the system would have been most
likely been imminent over time. This repair required shoring and stabilization while the
new construction was completed.
The central bearing wall separating the east and west half of the second floor had
endured many remodels and multiple installations of plumbing and mechanical systems.
4/2/2013
Town of Vail Page 2
As such, the studs in this wall had been cut to less than 25% of their normal dimensions,
but were still in place. The integrity of this wall was severely compromised. Once again,
this required the shoring of the existing structure to ensure integrity.
The plan called for the infill of the northern most door bay on the east side of the building
in order to convert the space into new public restrooms. It was discovered that there
was no foundation wall under this section of the exterior wall. A new foundation wall had
to be excavated, poured and backfilled.
It’s important to note that in order for these structural repairs to be made, we had to
remove and replace electrical and mechanical systems along with removing and
replacing drywall.
The structure now meets all current electrical, plumbing, mechanical and fire codes.
While it is unfortunate that the project is over budget, it is apparent that the TOV will reap
substantial benefits with the addition of public restrooms and two EHU’s that will help alleviate
the problem of “core essential” employees leaving Vail to move to the Front Range or down
valley.
4/2/2013
To: Vail Town Council
From: Department of Public Works and Transportation
Date: April 2, 2013
Subject: Supplemental Fund Appropriation for Streamwalk Project
I. BACKGROUND
The Streamwalk, between Vail Valley Drive and Ford Park, is a popular and heavily used
pedestrian path. It provides access to Ford Park and opportunities for recreation. The overall
length of this path section is 1150 feet. Over this length the grade of the path the maximum
grade exceeds 17% in places making utilization difficult for many users. The steep grade and
gravel surface make the path subject to frequent washouts from heavy rain and irrigation run off.
Washouts create trip hazards and introduce sediment into Gore Creek.
II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed improvements to the Streamwalk are consistent with the 2012 Ford Park
Management Plan (Section 5, Goal 5, Objective 5.2) and will improve the comfort and safety of
path users. The attached plan sheets, with added notations, will help to illustrate the extent of
the improvements.
The proposed improvements will improve approximately 630 feet of path reducing the maximum
grade of 17% to a maximum grade of 8%. The improvements will also realign a section of the
path and remove it from the 100 year floodplain. Additional path can be removed from the
floodplain if the Council determines the small picnic space is inappropriate in the location
proposed. The path will remain at it current 6 foot width and will be resurfaced with a more
stable gravel material than is used currently.
The improvements include the addition of approximately 270 feet of low boulder wall intended to
reduce the overall size of the disturbed area and save several mature spruce trees from
construction impacts.
III. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST
R.A. Nelson has provided a favorable cost proposal to construct the proposed Streamwalk
improvements. The requested budget including contingency is $360,000. Boulders for
construction of the walls have been salvaged from Ford Park which will result in approximately
$16,000 in trucking costs.
R.A. Nelson is prepared to begin construction immediately and has provided and estimated
completion date of June 10, 2013.
4/2/2013
4/2/2013
mi
l
e
s
km
1
2
4/2/2013
4/2/2013
4/2/2013
4/2/2013
4/2/2013
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013
ORDINANCE NO. 6
SERIES OF 2013
AN ORDINANCE MAKING BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL
FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND, CONFERENCE
CENTER FUND, DISPATCH SERVICE FUND AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND OF THE
2013 BUDGET FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE SAID
ADJUSTMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD
THERETO.
WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 2013 which could not have
been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No.
16, Series of 2012, adopting the 2013 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado;
and,
WHEREAS, the Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are
available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in
accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and,
WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make
certain budget adjustments as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO that:
1. Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town
Council hereby makes the following budget adjustments for the 2013 Budget and Financial Plan for
the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the following budget adjustments:
General Fund $ 81,500
Capital Projects Fund 7,095,207
Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 12,906,393
Conference Center Fund 7,627,694
Dispatch Services Fund 157,146
Heavy Equipment Fund 180,200
Total $ 28,048,140
2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each
4/2/2013
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013
part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants
thereof.
4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty
imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced,
nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent
herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed
to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON
FIRST READING this 19th day of March, 2013, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance
on the 2nd day of April, 2013, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail,
Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the town.
_______________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this 2nd
day of April 2013.
_____________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
4/2/2013