Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-09-17 Agenda and Support Documentation Town Council Evening Session
VAILTOWNCOUNCIL EVENINGSESSIONAGENDA TOWNOfVAV VAILTOWNCOUNCILCHAMBERS 75S. FrontageRoadW. Vail, CO81657 6:00P.M., SEPTEMBER17, 2013 NOTE: Timesofitemsareapproximate, subjecttochange, andcannot bereliedupontodetermineatwhattimeCouncilwillconsider anitem. 1. ITEM/TOPIC: CitizenParticipation: (15min.) 2. ITEM/TOPIC: ConsentAgenda: 1) ResolutionNo. 9, Seriesof2013 (5min. ) 3. ITEM/TOPIC: TownManagersReport: 1) PedestrianSafetyonMeadowDrive; 2) EagleAirAllianceletterofsupport; 3) Winterparkingupdate (5min. ) PRESENTER(S): StanZemler 4. ITEM/TOPIC: Arequestforapublichearingtoprovideanupdatetothe VailTownCouncilontheprogressofthe2013GeraldR. FordParkMaster PlanandtoseekdirectionfromtheVailTownCouncilonthesiteselection preferencefortheproposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter. 30minutes) PRESENTER(S): GeorgeRuther, DirectorofCommunityDevelopment ACTIONREQUESTEDOFCOUNCIL: Theintendedoutcomeofthispublic hearingistogetananswertothefollowingquestion: ShouldtheTownStaff activelypursuetheTennisCenterBuildingsiteinFordParkasapotential locationfortheproposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter? BACKGROUND: TheTownofVailPlanningandEnvironmental Commissionhasmadesubstantialprogressonthereviewoftheproposed 2013GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlan. MuchoftheCommission'sfeedback, alongwiththatsharedbythepublic, hasbeenincorporatedintothedraftplan. Few, ifany, substantiveissues remainoutstanding. Theoneexceptionisthesiteselectionoftheproposed BettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter. AnoverallobjectiveofthemasterplanningprocessforFordParkisthe selectionofasitefortheproposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducation Center. Onceselected, itisintendedthatthechosensitewillbedocumented andillustratedinthemasterplanforthePark. Withthesitedocumentedand illustrated, themasterplanwouldthenbeusedtoevaluateanydevelopment applicationproposalsubmittedfortheEducationCenterintheTown's developmentreviewprocess. STAFFRECOMMENDATION: TownStaffrecommendstheVailTown Councilprovidesdirectiononwhetherthetenniscentersiteshouldremainin consideration. WiththisOrp¢d(westablished, thePECcanproceedforward inmakingarecommendationonthe2013GeraldR. FordMasterPlan. 5. ITEM/TOPIC: FirstreadingofOrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013, An OrdinanceAmendingtheVailTownCodetoIncreasetheMaximumFinefor CodeViolationsinAccordancewithStateLawandSettingForthDetailsin RegardThereto. (10min. ) PRESENTER(S): MattMire ACTIONREQUESTEDOFCOUNCIL: Approve, approvewith modifications, ordenyOrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013onfirstreading. BACKGROUND: TheColoradoGeneralAssemblyrecentlypassedHouse Bill13-1060, whichincreasedthemaximumfineavailableunderstatelawfor violationsofmunicipalordinances. OrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013 amendstheVailTownCodetoallowforanincreaseofthemaximumfine amountavailablethereundertocorrespondwiththemaximumfineamount availableunderstatelaw. STAFFRECOMMENDATION: Approve, approvewithmodifications, or denyOrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013onfirstreading. 6. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (7:15p.m.) 9/17/2013 TOWNOfVAV VAILTOWNCOUNCILAGENDAMEMO MEETINGDATE: September17, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: CitizenParticipation: 9/17/2013 TOWNOfVA10 VAILTOWNCOUNCILAGENDAMEMO MEETINGDATE: September17, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: ConsentAgenda: 1) ResolutionNo. 9, Seriesof2013 ATTACHMENTS: ResolutionNo. 9, Seriesof2013 9/17/2013 RESOLUTIONNO. 9 Seriesof2013 ARESOLUTIONESTABLISHINGATOWNOFVAILPUBLICRECORDSPOLICY; ANDSETTINGFORTHDETAILSINREGARDTHERETO. WHEREAS, theTownofVail (the "Town"), intheCountyofEagleandStateof Coloradoisahomerulemunicipalcorporationdulyorganizedandexistingunderthe lawsoftheStateofColoradoandtheTownCharter (the "Charter"); WHEREAS, themembersoftheTownCounciloftheTown (the "Council") have beendulyelectedandqualified; and WHEREAS, theTowndesirestoimplementawrittenpolicythatwillservethe public'srighttoaccesspublicrecordspursuanttotheColoradoOpenRecordsAct, C.R.S. § 24-72-200.1, etseq., ("CORA") whileidentifyingtoemployeestheinherent difficultiesinensuringprivacyintheuseoftheTown'scomputersystemforpersonal use; NOWTHEREFORE, BEITRESOLVEDBYTHETOWNCOUNCILOFTHE TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADOTHAT: Section1. TheCouncilherebyapprovestheTownofVailPublicRecords PolicyintheformasattachedheretoasExhibitA. Section2. ThisResolutionshalltakeeffectimmediatelyuponitspassage. INTRODUCED, PASSEDANDADOPTEDataregularmeetingoftheTown CounciloftheTownofVailheldthis3rddayofSeptember, 2013. AndrewP. Daly TownMayor ATTEST: TammyNagel, ActingTownClerk ResolutionNo.9,Series2013 9/17/2013 EXHIBITA TOWNOFVAILPUBLICRECORDSPOLICY I.PURPOSE ThepolicyoftheTownofVail (the "Town") isthatthedecision-makingprocessisa matterofpublicbusinessandmaynotbeconductedinsecret. Allpublicrecordsshallbeopen forinspectionbyanypersonatreasonabletimes, exceptasotherwiseprovidedbylaw. However, computer-generatedcommunicationsystemsarefrequentlyusedbyemployeesforthe purposesofdocumentingandsendingpersonalorprivatemessages, ormessagesnotintendedto beviewedbythepublic. TheTowndesirestoimplementapolicythatwillservethepublic's righttoaccesspublicrecords, whileidentifyingtoemployeestheinherentdifficultiesinensuring privacyintheuseoftheTown'scomputersystemforpersonaluse. II. AUTHORITY TheTownenactsthisPolicyunderthefollowingauthority: theColoradoOpenRecords Act, C.R.S. § 24-72-201, etseq., asamended (the "CORA"); theColoradoSunshineLaw, C.R.S. 24-6-401, etseq., asamended; Blackv. SouthwesternWaterConservationDistrict, 74P.3d462 Colo. App. 2003); GlenwoodPostv. CityofGlenwoodSprings, 731P2d761 (Colo. App. 1986); andMountainPlainsInvestmentCorp. v. ParkerJordanMetro. Dist., 12CA1034 (Colo. App.,August15, 2013). III. DEFINITIONS ForpurposesofthisPolicy, thefollowingtermsshallhavethefollowingmeanings: Correspondence: Acommunicationthatissenttoorreceivedbyoneormore specificallyidentifiedindividualsandthatisorcanbeproducedinwrittenform, including, withoutlimitation, communicationssentviaelectronicmail, privatecourier, U.S. mail, modem orcomputer. CustodianofRecords: Theindividualwhoshallberesponsibleforcompilingdocuments, schedulingappointmentsforinspection, andforrespondingtoanypublicrecordsrequest. The TownCouncilherebydesignatestheVailTownClerkastheCustodianofRecords. ElectronicMail ("E-mail'): Anelectronicmessagethatistransmittedbetweentwoor morecomputersorelectronicterminals, whetherornotthemessageisconvertedtohardcopy formatafterreceiptandwhetherornotthemessageisviewedupontransmissionorstoredfor laterretrieval. E-mailincludeselectronicmessagesthataretransmittedthroughalocal, regional orglobalcomputernetwork. WorkProduct: Alladvisoryordeliberativematerialsassembledforthebenefitofelected officials, whichmaterialsexpressanopinionoraredeliberativeinnatureandarecommunicated forthepurposeofassistingsuchelectedofficialsinreachingadecisionwithinthescopeoftheir authority. Suchmaterialsinclude, butarenotlimitedto: notesandmemorandathatrelatetoor serveasbackgroundinformationforsuchdecisions; andpreliminarydraftsanddiscussioncopies 9112113 RWb&AGEIDESKTOPS$UXAGELIDESKTOPIRECORDSPOLICY-2.DOC ofdocumentsthatexpressadecisionbyanelectedofficial. "Workproduct" alsoincludesa requestbyaTownofficialforthepreparationofsuchopinionordeliberativematerials. For example, iftheTownManagerrequestsinwritingthatstaffpreparematerialtoassisttheTown Councilinadecision-makingprocess, thewrittenrequestshallalsobeconsideredworkproduct. IV. PROTECTEDRECORDS A. CertainrecordsareprotectedbylawfrompublicinspectionundertheCORA, includingthefollowing: Personnelfiles Ongoinginvestigationsbylawenforcementauthorities Victim/witnessinformation Socialsecuritynumbers Juvenilecriminalrecords Workproduct Deliberativeprocessrecords Attorney-clientprivilegedrecords Individualmedical,mentalhealth, sociologicalandscholasticachievementdata Lettersofreference Tradesecrets Confidentialcommercialorfinancialdata Personalinformationofpastorpresentusersofpublicutilities, facilities, or recreationalorculturalservices Recordsofsexualharassmentcomplaintsandinvestigations Libraryrecordsandcontributions Addressesandtelephonenumbersofpublicschoolstudents B. RecordsthatareexemptfromtheCORAmightstillbeaccessibleviaotherforms ofinspection, suchassubpoena. V. PRIVACY Employeesshouldhavenoexpectationofprivacywhenusinganyequipmentowned, leasedoroperatedbytheTown. Informationstoredonsuchequipmentissubjecttoauditand reviewbytheTownatanytime, foranyreason. Suchinformationmayalsoconstituteapublic recordundertheCORA. 2 9112113 9/17/2013 11vws-storageldesktops$1tnagehdesktoplrecordspolicy-2.doc VI. E-MAIL A. TheTown'se-mailsystemisprovidedbytheTowntofacilitateTownworkandis intendedforbusiness-relatedcommunications, includingusesrelatedtoTown-sponsoredevents andactivities. TheTownrecognizesthatoccasionalpersonalusewilloccur, andsuchuseis permittedaslongasitdoesnotinterruptthenormalflowofTownbusiness. However, any improperuse, asdeterminedbytheTown, isprohibitedandmayresultin: suspensionorlossof e-mailaccess; disciplinaryactionuptoandincludingterminationofemployment; and/orlegal action. B. E-mailcorrespondenceofTownemployeesandelectedofficialsmaybeapublic recordundertheCORAandthereforemaybesubjecttopublicinspection. Exceptionsto inspectionmayincludee-mailwhichiscoveredbytheattorney-clientprivilege, workproduct privilegeorotherprivilegerecognizedbyColoradolaw. Mostroutinee-mail, however, will likelybeconsideredpublicinformation. Employeesandelectedofficialsshouldhaveno expectationofprivacywhenusingtheTown'se-mailsystem. Allelectroniccommunications sentorreceivedontheTown'se-mailsystem, regardlessofthesubjectmatterore-mailaddress used, areTownpropertyandmaybesubjecttodisclosureundertheCORA. TheTownreserves therightatanytime, tomonitor, access, view, use, copyand/ordiscloseallsuche-mail messages. C. E-mailusersareresponsibleforsafeguardingtheirpasswordsandmaynot disclosetheirpasswordstoothers. However, theuseofapassworddoesnotpreventtheTown frommonitoring, accessing, viewing, using, copyingordisclosinganye-mailmessagessentor receivedontheTown'se-mailsystem. D. Townemployeesmaynotaccessthecomputeraccountofanotherunlessgranted permissiontodosobythatuser. Thisrestrictiondoesnotapplytosystemadministratorsand otherswhoareauthorizedtoaccessthesystemsforlegitimatebusinesspurposes. E. Improperuseofe-mailincludes,butisnotlimitedto: 1. Languagewhichisoffensive, obscene, orinpoortaste, includingjokesor messageswhichcreateanintimidating, hostileoroffensiveworkenvironment; 2. MessagesorinformationwhichconflictwiththeTown'spoliciesagainst discriminationorharassmentintheworkplace; 3. Messagesorinformationwhichadvertiseorpromoteabusiness, political candidate, politicalorreligiouscause; 4. Referencesormessageswhichgiveoffenseonthebasisofrace, color, religion,nationalorigin, citizenship, ancestry, maritalstatus, sex, disability, age, veteran's statusorsexualorientation; 5. FrivoloususewhichinterruptsthenormalflowofTownbusiness, suchas playinggames, conductingbettingpools, andchainletters; 3 9112113 9/17/2013 11vws-storageldesktops$1tnagehdesktoplrecordspolicy-2.doc 6. Messageswhichviolateanylaw; and 7. Messagesurgingelectorstovoteinfavorofanystatewideballotissue, localballotissue,referredmeasure, orrecall,pursuanttoC.R.S. § 1-45-117. F. Townemployeesandelectedofficialsareexpectedtousecommonsenseand goodjudgmentinallofficialcommunicationsandtoavoidanycommunicationthatis disrespectful, offensive, orthreateningtoothers. Violationofthispolicymayresultinanyorall ofthefollowing: suspensionorlossofe-mailaccess; disciplinaryactionuptoandincluding terminationofemployment; andlegalaction. G. E-mailisretainedontheTown'sserverforadesignatedperiodoftime, so employeesandelectedofficialsshouldnotassumethatanye-mailthattheypersonallydeleteis therebydeletedfromtheTown'sserver. TheTownwillretain, archive, orpurge, astheTown deemsappropriate, anyincomingoroutgoinge-mailtoorfromanyTownemployee. H. PursuanttotheColoradoSunshineLaw, ameetingofthreeormoremembersof theTownCouncilatwhichanypublicbusinessisdiscussedoratwhichanyformalactionmay betakenisapublicmeeting. Theterm "discussion" asusedintheColoradoSunshineLaw implieslive, responsivecommunicationbetweenelectedofficials. Therefore, itistheTown's policythatthemerereceiptortransmissionofe-mailinotherthanalive, communicative discussionformatshallnotconstituteapublicmeetingandshallnotbesubjecttothe requirementsoftheColoradoSunshineLaw. Forexample, thereceiptbyoneormoreelected officialsofe-mailsentearlierinthedayorweekbyanotherelectedofficialconcerningpublic businessshallnotconstitutea "publicmeeting." Thee-mailmay, however, constituteapublic recordotherwisesubjecttodisclosurepursuanttotheCORAandthisPolicy. VII. RETENTIONOFDOCUMENTS Allpublicrecordsotherthane-mailshallberetainedinaccordancewiththeguidelines establishedbytheColoradoStateArchives. AttherequestoftheTownAttorney, theCustodian ofRecordsmayretaincertainrecordsaftertheretentionperiodexpires. VIII. INSPECTION A. General. Publicrecordsshallbeopenforinspectionbyanypersonatreasonable times, subjecttotheexceptionsfoundintheCORA. Allpublicrecordsshallbeinspectedat TownHallorattheofficesoftheTownAttorney. B. RequestRequired. Arequesttoinspectpublicrecordsmustbewritten, and sufficientlyspecificinscopetoenabletheCustodianofRecordstoidentifytheinformation desired. Requestsforinspectionofe-mailshallincludethesender'sname, therecipient'sname andtheapproximatedateandtimeofthetransmission. IftheCustodianofRecordsreceivesa requesttoinspectpublicrecordsthatisambiguousorlackssufficientspecificitytoenablethe CustodianofRecordstolocatetherecords, theCustodianofRecordsshall, withinthreeworking days, notifytherequestingpartyinwritingofthedeficienciesintherequest. Anyclarified requestshallbeconsideredanewrequestforpurposesofthisPolicyandtheCORA. 4 9112113 9/17/2013 11vws-storageldesktops$1tnagehdesktoplrecordspolicy-2.doc C. ReviewandResponse. Uponreceiptofarequestforinspectionofpublicrecords, theCustodianofRecordsshallreviewtherequestanddeterminewhethertherequestedrecords arevoluminous, inactiveuse, orotherwisenotreadilyavailable. Ifsodetermined, theCustodian ofRecords, withinthreebusinessdays, shallnotifytherequestingpartyinwritingthatthe documentswillbeproducedforinspectionwithinsevenadditionalbusinessdays, pursuantto C.R.S. § 24-72-203(3). Notwithstandingtheforegoing, ifitisphysicallyimpossibleforthe CustodianofRecordstocomplywitharequestforpublicrecordswithinthetimeperiods establishedbyCORA, theCustodianofRecordsshallcomplywiththerequestassoonas physicallypossible. Iftherecordsarereadilyavailable, theCustodianofRecordsshallsonotify therequestingparty. Eachnoticeshallincludetherequireddeposit, ifapplicable, andthetotal amountoffeesthatmustbepaidpriortoproductionortransmissionoftherecords. D. TransmissionorProduction. Asdirectedinthewrittenrequestforrecords, the CustodianofRecordswilltransmittherequestedrecordsbye-mail, regularmail, courierservice orfacsimile. Ifnodirectionisprovidedintherequest, theCustodianofRecordswillmakethe recordsavailableforinspectionatTownHallbyappointment. Innocaseshallrecordsbe transmittedorproduceduntilallfeesunderSectionIXhavebeenreceivedbytheTown. Once allfeesarepaid, theCustodianshalltransmitorproducetherecordswithinthreebusinessdays, unlessalongertimeisprovidedbySectionCabove. E. TownAttorney. AnyofthenoticesrequiredhereinmaybeissuedbytheTown AttorneyinlieuoftheCustodianofRecords. Bywrittennotice, theTownAttorneymayfurther requirethatanyrequestingpartycontacttheTownAttorneyratherthantheCustodianof Records. IX. FEES A. Copies, PrintoutsorPhotographs. PursuanttoC.R.S. § 24-72-205(5)(a), the Townshallchargeafeenottoexceed25centsperstandardpageforanycopyofapublicrecord orafeenottoexceedtheactualcostofprovidingacopy, printoutorphotographofapublic recordwhichisinaformatotherthanastandardpage. ForpurposesofthisPolicy, ablackand whitecopymadeonasinglesheetofletterorlegalsizedwhitepapershallconstitutea "standard page." B. ResearchandRetrievalFees. TheTownreservestherighttochargearesearch andretrievalfeeof $25.00perhourforanystafftimedevotedtosearchingfortherequested information. Agreaterfeemaybeassessedifprofessionalassistanceisneededtoretrievethe requestedinformation, includinganyactualattorneyfeesincurredintheperformanceofa privilegereviewandthecreationofaprivilegelog. Adepositofequalto50% oftheestimated costsofrespondingtoarecordsrequestshallbesubmittedtotheTownpriortoanysearchbeing commenced. C. Postage/CourierFees. IftheCustodianofRecordstransmitsrecordsbyregular mailorcourierservice, therequestingpartyshallberesponsibleforthecostofpostageorcourier fees. 5 9112113 9/17/2013 11vws-storageldesktops$1tnagehdesktoplrecordspolicy-2.doc D. ElectronicTransmissionFees. TheCustodianofRecordsmaynotcharge transmissionfeestotherequestingpartyfortransmittingpublicrecordsviae-mail, providedthat therequestingpartymaybechargedforstafftimeassociatedwithresearchandretrievalofthe requestedrecordsasprovidedherein. 6 9112113 9/17/2013 11vws-storageldesktops$1tnagehdesktoplrecordspolicy-2.doc TOWNOfVA10 VAILTOWNCOUNCILAGENDAMEMO MEETINGDATE: September17, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: TownManagersReport: 1) PedestrianSafetyonMeadowDrive; 2) EagleAirAllianceletterofsupport; 3) Winterparkingupdate PRESENTER(S): StanZemler ATTACHMENTS: EagleAirAllianceSupportRequest 9/17/2013 September5, 2013 SaraFisher, Commissioner JillRyan, Commissioner KathyChandler-Henry, Commissioner KeithMontag, CountyManager EagleCounty POBox850 500Broadway Eagle, CO81631 DearEagleCountyCommissionersandManagerMontag: First, theboardandmembersoftheEGEAirAlliancecannotthankyouenoughforthe timeandattentionyouhavesparedforus, particularlyduringourlastmeetingon September3. EagleCountyisavitalpartnertotheAlliance, andyoursupportremainsof criticalimportancetoourefforts. AndthatiswhywewishtoreiterateourrequesttoEagleCountyfor $200,000infunding for2014. WerealizethatoursisnottheonlyrequestforfundsthattheCountywill receive. Butwecannotoveremphasizetheimportanceofourcombinedeffortstothe successoftheEagleCountyRegionalAirportandtotheoveralleconomicwellbeingof EagleCounty. Thechallengesthatwefacearealarming. Aslowlyrecoveringeconomyhasnot translatedintoareboundinpassengerstoourairport. Infact, totalenplanementsandseat capacityattheEagleCountyRegionalAirporthavecontinuedtodeclinefrom2007 throughthepresentday. Andaswehavediscussed, thistrendcouldonlyworseninthe faceoffewerairlinesandsmalleraircraftflyingintoourairport. Additionally, wehave seenthattheColoradocommunitieswiththeirownregionalairportshavenotstoodidly by; theyhavetakenunited, proactivestepstocounterthesesameissues. TheEGEAirAlliancerecognizesthatthesechallengesbelongtoallofusinEagle County. Everytown, everybusiness, everypersonwillbenefitfromourcombined success, ortheywillsufferfromourcombinedfailure. Andthatiswhythedirectsupport fromEagleCountywillbemorethanmatchedbyfundsfromEagleCounty's municipalitiesandresortcompanies, aswellasfromthecounty'smanybusinesses. Armedwiththesecombinedresources, theAlliancewillachievethreegoalsfor2014. First, wehopetogrowthesummerflightbetweenourairportandHouston— aflightthat broughtover3,000visitorstoourvalley, andwhichcanonlygrowinpopularityasit continues. Second, webelievethatadditionalflightopportunitiesexistrightnow. Whetherthese includeawinterflightfromWashingtonD.C. orasummerflightfromChicago, our 9/17/2013 combinedfundscouldbringthousandsofadditionalvisitortoourairportandtoour communities. Andfinally, werealizetheimportanceofdevelopingoneormorelong-termfunding sourcessimilartothosealreadyputinplacebyotherresortcommunitiesinandnear Colorado. Ourcombinedfundsandeffortswillhopefullymakethislong-term, sustainablefundingarealityin2014andbeyond. Again, werespectfullyaskthatEagleCountyactfavorablyuponourrequest. Andwe hopethatyouwillcontinuetostandshoulder-to-shoulderwiththebusinesses, theresorts andthegovernmentsthataretheEGEAirAlliance. Thankyou. Sincerely, MichaelS. Brown, EGEBoardPresidentKelliMcDonald, EGEBoardMember AlpineBank,AvonTheTownofVail GabeShalley, EGEBoardTreasurer MikeBrumbaugh, EGEBoardMember VailResorts, Inc. VentureSports, Avon PeterDann, EGEBoardSecretary JeanAlexander, EGEBoardMember EastWestResorts TheResortCompany, BeaverCreek TimothyBaker, EGEBoardMemberJohnShipp, EGEBoardMember BeaverCreekResortCompanyDionysusHospitality, Eagle & BeaverCreek JeffShroll, EGEBoardMember TracyWalter, EGEBoardMember TownofGypsumColoradoMountainExpress RichCarroll, EGEBoardMember TownofAvon 9/17/2013 9/17/2013 TOWNOFVA10 VAILTOWNCOUNCILAGENDAMEMO MEETINGDATE: September17, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: ArequestforapublichearingtoprovideanupdatetotheVailTownCouncilon theprogressofthe2013GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlanandtoseekdirectionfromtheVail TownCouncilonthesiteselectionpreferencefortheproposedBettyFordAlpineGarden EducationCenter. PRESENTER(S): GeorgeRuther, DirectorofCommunityDevelopment ACTIONREQUESTEDOFCOUNCIL: Theintendedoutcomeofthispublichearingistoget ananswertothefollowingquestion: ShouldtheTownStaffactivelypursuetheTennisCenter BuildingsiteinFordParkasapotentiallocationfortheproposedBettyFordAlpineGarden EducationCenter? BACKGROUND: TheTownofVailPlanningandEnvironmentalCommissionhasmade substantialprogressonthereviewoftheproposed2013GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlan. MuchoftheCommission'sfeedback, alongwiththatsharedbythepublic, hasbeen incorporatedintothedraftplan. Few, ifany, substantiveissuesremainoutstanding. Theone exceptionisthesiteselectionoftheproposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter. AnoverallobjectiveofthemasterplanningprocessforFordParkistheselectionofasitefor theproposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter. Onceselected, itisintendedthat thechosensitewillbedocumentedandillustratedinthemasterplanforthePark. Withthesite documentedandillustrated, themasterplanwouldthenbeusedtoevaluateanydevelopment applicationproposalsubmittedfortheEducationCenterintheTown'sdevelopmentreview process. STAFFRECOMMENDATION: TownStaffrecommendstheVailTownCouncilprovides directiononwhetherthetenniscentersiteshouldremaininconsideration. Withthisdirection established, thePECcanproceedforwardinmakingarecommendationonthe2013Gerald R. FordMasterPlan. ATTACHMENTS: StaffMemorandum September9, 2013PECMeetingResults 9/17/2013 K TOWNOFVAIL "' Memorandum TO: PlanningandEnvironmentalCommission FROM: CommunityDevelopmentDepartment DATE: September17, 2013 SUBJECT: ArequestforapublichearingtoprovideanupdatetotheVailTownCouncilonthe progressofthe2013GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlanandtoseekdirectionfromthe VailTownCouncilonthesiteselectionpreferencefortheproposedBettyFordAlpine GardenEducationCenter. Applicant: TownofVail, representedbyTomBraun, Braun &Associates, Inc. Planner: GeorgeRuther I.DESCRIPTIONOFREQUEST Theapplicant, theTownofVail (ToV), representedbyTomBraun, isrequestingapublichearing withtheVailTownCouncil (TC). Thepurposeofthepublichearingisto: 1) provideanupdateontheprogressofthe2013GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlan. 2) seekdirectiononthesiteselectionpreferencefortheproposedBettyFordAlpineGarden EducationCenter. Theintendedoutcomeofthispublichearingistogetananswertothefollowingquestion: ShouldtheTownStaffactivelypursuetheTennisCenterBuildingsiteinFordParkasa potentiallocationfortheproposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter? II.BACKGROUND TheTownofVailPlanningandEnvironmentalCommissionhasmadesubstantialprogresson thereviewoftheproposed2013GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlan. Todate, theCommission hasreviewedandprovidedfeedbackonthefollowingelementsofthedraftplan: Goals, objectives, policiesandactionssteps FordParksubareas IllustrativePlan DesignCriteria MuchoftheCommission'sfeedback, alongwiththatsharedbythepublic, hasbeen incorporatedintothedraftplan. Few, ifany, substantiveissuesremainoutstanding. Theone exceptionisthesiteselectionoftheproposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter. 9/17/2013 AnoverallobjectiveofthemasterplanningprocessforFordParkistheselectionofasiteforthe proposedBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter. Onceselected, itisintendedthatthe chosensitewillbedocumentedandillustratedinthemasterplanforthePark. Withthesite documentedandillustrated, themasterplanwouldthenbeusedtoevaluateanydevelopment applicationproposalsubmittedfortheEducationCenterintheTown'sdevelopmentreview process. TheTownStaffhasevaluatedatleastseven (7) possiblesitesfortheproposedEducation Center. Toobjectivelyevaluatethesevensites, asiteselectionmatrixwasdevelopedandeach ofthesiteswasevaluatedbaseduponasetofcriteria (ie, sitesuitability, sitecharacter, visual connections, vehicularandpedestriancirculation, etc.). Asaresultofthiseffort, onJuly16tH theTownCouncilidentifiedthesitealongWestBettyFordWayadjacentthechildren's playgroundasthe "preferredsite" andinstructedstafftopursueasecondlevelofsitefeasibility. ThesitefeasibilityreportwasprovidedtotheVailTownCouncilonSeptember 4th. Insum, the reportconcludedthattheWestBettyFordWaysitewasfeasiblegiventherelocationand installationofcertainbelow-gradeinfrastructure. Thecurrentdraftofthemasterplanproposes thissitefortheEducationCenterbuilding. TheTownofVailPlanningandEnvironmentalCommissionhasrequestedthatmoreanalysis anddiscussionoccursaroundthepossibilitiesofco-locatingtheproposedEducationCenter withthetenniscenterbuilding, presumablywithanewsharedbuildingorwithanadditiontothe existingbuilding. TheCommissionbelievesgiventhegoals, objectivesandpoliciesoutlinedin thedraftmasterplan, thetenniscenterbuildingsitehasmeritandisworthyofcontinued consideration. AccordingtotheCommission, theissueisnotthattheWestBettyFordWaysite isunsuitable, butrather, thatthetenniscenterbuildingsiteappearstobebetterasthesiteisin closerproximitytotransitandparking, furthersthebroadobjectivesof"fewerbuildingsare betterthanmorebuildings" and "encouragesharedusebuildings", andaddressestheneedto eliminatethepotentialproblemofmanagingvehiclesonthelowerbenchToaidindetermining whetheranycontinuedconsiderationshouldbeundertakenTownStaffhasdevelopedalistof possibleprosandcons. ProsandCons ofthe TennisCenterBuildingSite Pros Capableofaccommodatingloading ConvenientaccesstotheAlpine anddeliveryneeds Gardens ADAaccessible Siteissuitabletoaccommodatea Closeproximitytopublictransitstop 3,000sq. ft. building Topographyofthesiteisconducive Easilyaccessibletovehicleparking toamulti-usebuilding Locatedonmajorpedestrianroute Usesarecompatible withinthePark Synergiesbetweentheusesmay Utilitiesreadilyavailable exist Convenientyearroundaccess Easilyaccessibletoemergency vehicles Consistentwithproposedmaster plangoals, objectivesandpolicies Infilldevelopmentversusgreenfield development TownofVail 9/17/2013Page2 Cons Requiresadditionalfunding Tenniscenterbuildingisownedby ReducesthesizeoftheVRDlease theVRD area CurrentleasewiththeVRDdoesnot Maydelaytheadoptionofthe2013 contemplateashareduse GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlan Redevelopmentofthebuilding wouldtemporarilydisplacetennis centerandadministrativeofficeuse TownofVail 9/17/2013Page3 TOWNOFVAIL' PLANNINGANDENVIRONMENTALCOMMISSION September9, 2013at1:00pm TOWNCOUNCILCHAMBERS/ PUBLICWELCOME 75S. FrontageRoad -Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERSPRESENTMEMBERSABSENT BillPierceSusanBird HenryPratt JohnRediker MichaelKurz PamHopkins LukeCartin 45minutes 1. ArequestforarecommendationtotheVailTownCouncilonamajoramendmenttoSpecial DevelopmentDistrictNo. 6, VailVillageInn, pursuanttoSection12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, VailTownCode, toallowforanadditiontoanexistingdwellingunit, locatedat16 VailRoad, (TheSebastian)/PartofLotsM, N, andO, Block5D, VailVillageFiling1, andsetting forthdetailsinregardthereto. (PEC130021) Applicant: AMPH, LLC, representedbyMaurielloPlanningGroup Planner: WarrenCampbell ACTION: Recommendationofapprovalwithcondition(s) MOTION: KurzSECOND: PierceVOTE: 2-3 (Carlin, Pratt, Hopkinsopposed) Motionfailed ACTION: TabledtoSeptember23, 2013 MOTION: CarlinSECOND: Hopkins VOTE: 4-1 (Kurzopposed) WarrenCampbellgaveapresentationperthestaffmemorandum CommissionerPierceaskedforclarificationregardingwhatportionofthesquarefootage requestedresultedfromanincreaseinwallheight. DominicMauriello, representingtheapplicant, estimatedthatapproximately10% oftheproposed GRFAadditionwasaresultofraisingtheroof. CommissionerKurzaskedwhatissueswererelatedtoanSDDandagrantingspecialprivilege. GeorgeRuther, DirectorofCommunityDevelopment, discussedthatthereviewcriteriaforboth theapprovalandmodificationofanSDDwerethesame. HeaddedthateachSDDisevaluated pursuanttothecriteria, independentofanypreviousapprovals. CommissionerKurzaskedhowthispotentialapprovaleffectsotherSDDapplicationstopushthe enveloperegardingheight. GeorgeRutherspoketothelackofprecedentsettingactioninthisoranyotheradoptedSDD. Hereiteratedstaff'sapproachtothefirstcriteria. DominicMauriello, representingtheapplicant, introducedtheteam. Dominicdiscussedthe conceptualmeeting, sitewalk, andgeneralcommissionfeelingsarticulatedattheworksession. Dominicshowedchangestotheplansmadesincethepreviousmeeting. Dominictalkedabout staff'sconcernandhowtheapplicationdemonstratescompliance. Dominicdiscussedhowthis 9p1OT6W13 elementwouldnot, inhisbelief, beafactorintheoriginalapproval. Hewalkedthroughsomeof theslidesshowingbeforeandafterviewsoftheprojectanditspurportedlackofeffectonthe pedestrianexperience. Therewasnopubliccomment. CommissionerKurztalkedaboutthemassandscaleandthedesign/functionoftheexisting space, asnotbeingliveable/workablespace. Headdedhefeltitwasincompliance. CommissionerPrattstatedthathebelievedthenorthelevationwasnotaconcern, howeverthe eastelevationwasnotincompliancewiththecriteria. Hediscussedhowtheproposedaddition destroyedthesteppingdownofthemass. CommissionerCartinaskedforclarificationregardingthebuildingadditioninthesightlinesand howmuchreductionwouldbenecessarytomeetthesteppingneed. WarrenCampbellstatedthatthereislikelyadesignwhichwouldbeappropriatetomaintainthe steppingofthebulk, mass, andheight; however, staffwouldawaitdesignsketchesillustrating options, beforedeterminingwhatwasappropriatetomeetthecriterion. DominicMauriellospoketothebuildingsteppingincontexttootherprojectsintheareasandthe roofplan. Headdedthattheirwereminimalimpactsfromthepedestrianviewofthisproposal. CommissionerHopkinsaskedaboutthefloorandceilingheightsineachoftheareas. KevinMorley, PossArchitecture, statedthatthecurrentheightis14' andtheadditionalroof heightrequest (2feet) allowsfortheheightofthewallswhereitmeetsthespringpointforthe roofincreasingtoapproximately7.5feet. Heshowedthepicturesinsidetheunitandspoketo thewallheights. Hopkinsclarifiedherquestion. Moreelutalkedabouttheadditionandunitlayoutandhowitsworkstogethertocreateadequate wallandceilingheight. Amotiontorecommendapprovalfailed. CommissionerCartinmadeamotiontotabletothenextmeeting. GeorgeRutherspoketotheprocessandiftherewasinterestonthepartoftheapplicanttoalter theapplication. Iftherewasnointerestinmakingchangesthefailedrecommendationshould moveforwardintheprocess. DominicMaurielloreiteratedtheapplicantsdesiretocontinuewiththeCommissionandpossibly makechanges. GregSpencer, TimbersResorts, representingtheapplicant, statedthattheteamwouldgoback anddiscussanychangeswiththeowner. 90aTW113 90minutes 2. ArequestforarecommendationtotheVailTownCouncilontheadoptionofthe2013GeraldR. FordParkMasterPlan, anassemblageofthe1985FordParkMasterPlan, the1997FordPark ManagementPlan, andthe2012FordParkManagementPlanAmendment, locatedat530, 540, and580SouthFrontageRoadEast/Unplatted, andsettingforthdetailsinregardthereto. PEC130012) Applicant: TownofVail Planner: GeorgeRuther ACTION: TabledSeptember23, 2013 MOTION: KurzSECOND: CartinVOTE: 5-0-0 GeorgeRuther, DirectorofCommunityDevelopment, introducedthegoaloftheworksession. Headdedthathewashopefulofprovidingadraftofthecompleteddocumenttothecommunity forreviewandcomment. TomBraun, BraunandAssociates, representingtheTown, beganhispresentationbyspeaking tothediscussionaroundthesuggestedlocationoftheBettyFordAlpineGardensnearthenew publicrestroomsandstoragebuildingonthewestendofFordPark. Hewentthroughamatrix depictingtheanalysisthatstaffandthegardenshadgonethroughinanalyzingsevenpotential locations. CommissionerPiercesuggestedthattheword "potential" shouldberemovedfromthedocument regardingtheimpactoftheBettyFordAlpineGardensEducationCenteronviewsfromThe Wrencondominiumsinordertoputthediscussiononthesitetorest. CommissionerKurzstatedhefeltthesitefortheBettyFordAlpineGardenEducationCenter wouldnotworktotheeastofTheWren. CommissionerPrattspoketohiscommentsoverthepasttwoyearsinoppositiontoabuildingto theeastofTheWren. Hewasconcernedaboutviewimpacts, busstopandparkingaccess proximity. CommissionerHopkinsspoketothepotentialtosplit (notstackingtheupperflooronthelower) thestructuresoitstepsdowntheslope. AccordingtoHopkins, architectshavesolvedmore difficultsiteconstraintsthanarepresent, includingview, ADAaccessibility, height, trees, bus stoplocation, etc. GeorgeRutherstatedthatstaffcoulddomorereviewandresearchifthatwasfelttobe necessary. HestatedthatitwouldbebeneficialtohavetheGarden'srepresentativesspeakto thesecommentsandquestions. CommissionerCartinstatedthathedidnotseethisasapreferredsite (eastofTheWren). He feltstronglythatmoreeffortshouldbefocusedonthetenniscentersite. CommissionerPiercestatedthatthisdiscussionisexactlywhyhevotedinoppositiontothe socialcourtyardatthelasthearing. ThelocationtotheeastofTheWrenmaybecompromised astherewasn'tfullthoughtintheMasterPlanonwherecertainusesandbuildingwere appropriate. HefeelsitismoreimportantforthebuildingtobeseenfromtheFrontageRoad. CommissionerHopkinsraisedthepointthattheBettyFordAlpineGardenandparkareused primarilyinthesummer, however, thebuildingisproposedtobeopenyearround. 9PaTdWj3 JimLamont, VailHomeownersAssociation, spoketoseveraltransportationconceptsthathave beenpreviouslyexploredwithround-abouts. HeagreedwithCommissionerPiercethatmaybea busstopisappropriateandneededontheFrontageRoadonthewestsideofFordPark. He spoketotheCommission'spreviousdiscussionswhichweretopreventadditionalbuildingson thelowerbenchofthepark. Thelocationproposedbelowtheretainingwallsforthesportsfields wouldviolatethispolicyfromthestart. Heaskedwheretheround-aboutthathastobeatFord ParkandnotinfrontofSolarisoftheBlueCowChutewastobelocated. Heaskedthatitbe showninthedocument. . NicolaRipley, DirectortotheBettyFordAlpineGardens, spoketothedifficultyinfindinga locationwhentherearemanyexistingimprovementsanduserswithinthepark. Ideallythe educationfacilitywouldbelocatednearparking, bevisiblefromtheFrontageRoad, andbeclose tothegardens. Thatsiteisprobablywhereoneofthetenniscourtsarecurrentlyconstructed. AccessibilityisveryimportantandthelocationnearTheWrenisaboutasfarawayasyoucould getfromthegarden. Vehicularaccessisnotthatimportanttothestructure. CommissionerPrattsummarizedthattheBettyFordAlpineGardensideallyshouldgowherethe tenniscenteristoday. Hestatedheunderstoodtheissueswithregardtocurrentusersofthat location, butthattheMasterPlanshouldnotcompromisethesitethatisbest. JackHunn, statedthathisperceptionwasthattheCommissionwastryingtonarrowthe EducationCenterdowntoonesite. Couldtherebeacoupleofsitesidentifiedaspossibilities? Suchasthetenniscourts, soccerfields, orbelowtheretainingwallssupportingtheathletic fields. HefeltthatasizelimitationonthestructureshouldnotbecontainedwithintheMaster Plan. Heaskedthatflexibilityinbuildingsizeandtrafficaccessbeincludedwithinthelanguage fortheEducationCenter. OtherusersbenefitfromlimitedaccessandtheEducationCenter shouldbepermittedaccessaswell. CommissionerPiercespoketoadesiretoremovethespecificsonsizeandspeakmoretothe scalethatisappropriate. CommissionerCartinspoketotheoverallgoaloftheCommissiontolookforefficienciesand reducetheperceptionofthreeseparateuserswithinthepark. Thetenniscenterandsoccer fieldskeepcomingupaspreferredlocations. CommissionerKurzspoketotheneedformoreinformationfromtheVailRecreationDistrict VRD). HowdoweworkwiththeVRDiftheyowntheirbuilding? Thetenniscenterareaisthe ideallocationasitconsolidatesusers, isvisible, andisnearparking. Canthatareabejointly plannedanddeveloped? JimLamontstatedthattheVRDleasecontainslanguagethatallowsfortheTownCouncilto discussdifferingthoughtsaboutuses, structures, etc. onthesite. Heraisedtheconcernabout theMasterPlannotshowingtheround-about. CommissionersPierceandKurzspoketotheneedtoincludeavisualdepictionoftheround- aboutintheplaninadditiontothewrittentext. GeorgeRuthersummarizedthatVRDinvolvementisneeded, morestudyofthetenniscenter siteisneeded, morestudyoftheround-aboutisneeded, andsomeconceptualstudyonthe EducationCenterdesignisnecessary. CommissionerCartinstatedthathestronglybelievesthetenniscenterareaisthebestlocation fortheEducationCenter. 9PaTW43 CommissionerPiercestatedthatheagreed, butwouldaddthattheconcessionsbuildingsite wouldworkaswell. TheremainingCommissionersstatedtheirsupportforthosecommentsanditwasagreedbyall thatequalfocusshouldbeplacedonthetenniscentersiteandtheWestBettyFordWay locations. TheCommissionrecognizedthechallengeswiththetenniscenter, butdon'tgiveup onthesite. TomBraunmovedforwardtoadiscussionofthegoals, objectives, andpolicystatements. JimLamontsuggestedthatacriterionforreviewofnewstructureswithintheparkshouldbethat thestructuremitigatesthenoiseimpactsoftheinterstateonthepark. TheCommissioners, GeorgeRuther, andTomBraunhadadiscussionregardingPolicy StatementNo. 2andthedesiredarchitecturaldirectionwithintheparkandaprohibitionof iconic" structures. CommissionerPierce, architectofthetenniscenter, statedthattheintentof thatdesignwastobeiconicandclearlyidentifythebuildingasthetenniscenter. Commissioner Hopkinsspoketo "iconic" asbeingbuildingswithegos. CommissionerPrattandothersagreed thatarchitecturalelementscouldbeincludedwithintheMasterPlanasageneralpolicydirection. 3. ArequestforthereviewofavariancefromSection12-6E-8, DensityControl, VailTownCode, pursuanttoChapter12-17, Variances, VailTownCode, toallowforanincreaseindwellingunits peracretofacilitatetheconstructionoftwosingle-familyresidences, locatedat1183and1191 CasolarDelNorteDrive/Lots4and5, CasolarVail, andsettingforthdetailsinregardthereto. PEC130010) Applicant: TodgerAnderson, representedbyTomBraun Planner: WarrenCampbell ACTION: TabletoOctober14, 2013 MOTION: KurzSECOND: CartinVOTE: 5-0-0 4. ApprovalofAugust26, 2012minutes MOTION: CartinSECOND: HopkinsVOTE: 4-0-1 (Prattrecused) 5. InformationUpdate CommissionerKurzwantedtoobjectstronglytotheTownCouncilstatementthatthe Commissionerredatapublichearingwiththepresspresent. Thisboardworkshardandinvests agreatdealoftime. CommissionerPrattstatedthathehasbeenonseveralCommissionsandthisCommission spendsmorethanothershehasbeenonreviewingeachproposal. 6. Adjournment MOTION: KurzSECOND: Cartin VOTE: 5-0-0 Theapplicationsandinformationabouttheproposalsareavailableforpublicinspectionduring regularofficehoursattheTownofVailCommunityDevelopmentDepartment, 75SouthFrontage Road. Thepublicisinvitedtoattendtheprojectorientationandthesitevisitsthatprecedethepublic hearingintheTownofVailCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. Timesandorderofitemsare approximate, subjecttochange, andcannotbereliedupontodetermineatwhattimethePlanning andEnvironmentalCommissionwillconsideranitem. Pleasecall (970) 479-2138foradditional 9PaTdW$3 information. Signlanguageinterpretationisavailableuponrequestwith24-hournotification. Please call (970) 479-2356, TelephonefortheHearingImpaired, forinformation. CommunityDevelopmentDepartment PublishedSeptember6, 2013intheVailDaily. 90oTdW63 TOWNOFVA10 VAILTOWNCOUNCILAGENDAMEMO MEETINGDATE: September17, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: FirstreadingofOrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013, AnOrdinanceAmendingthe VailTownCodetoIncreasetheMaximumFineforCodeViolationsinAccordancewithState LawandSettingForthDetailsinRegardThereto. PRESENTER(S): MattMire ACTIONREQUESTEDOFCOUNCIL: Approve, approvewithmodifications, ordeny OrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013onfirstreading. BACKGROUND: TheColoradoGeneralAssemblyrecentlypassedHouseBill13-1060, whichincreasedthemaximumfineavailableunderstatelawforviolationsofmunicipal ordinances. OrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013amendstheVailTownCodetoallowforan increaseofthemaximumfineamountavailablethereundertocorrespondwiththemaximum fineamountavailableunderstatelaw. STAFFRECOMMENDATION: Approve, approvewithmodifications, ordenyOrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013onfirstreading. ATTACHMENTS: OrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013 9/17/2013 ORDINANCENO. 14 SERIES2013 ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTHEVAILTOWNCODETOINCREASE THEMAXIMUMFINEFORCODEVIOLATIONSINACCORDANCE WITHSTATELAWANDSETTINGFORTHDETAILSINREGARD THERETO WHEREAS, theTownofVail, intheCountyofEagleandStateofColorado (the Town"), isahomerulemunicipalcorporationdulyorganizedandexistingunderthe lawsoftheStateofColoradoandtheVailTownCharter; WHEREAS, themembersoftheTownCounciloftheTown (the "Council") have beendulyelectedandqualified; WHEREAS, theColoradoGeneralAssemblyrecentlypassedHouseBill13- 1060, whichincreasedthemaximumfineavailableunderstatelawforviolationsof municipalordinances; and WHEREAS, theTownCouncildesirestoamendtheVailTownCodetoallowfor anincreaseofthemaximumfineamountavailablethereundertocorrespondwiththe maximumfineamountavailableunderstatelaw. NOW, THEREFORE, BEITORDAINEDBYTHETOWNCOUNCILOFTHE TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section1. Section1-4-1oftheVailTownCode, thegeneralpenaltyforall codeviolations, isherebyamendedasfollows: A. ViolationandPunishment. 1.Itisunlawfulforanypersontoviolateanyprovisionortofail tocomplywithanyoftherequirementsofthiscode. Unlessotherwise specificallyprovided, anypersoneighteen (18) yearsofageorolder violatinganysectionofthiscodeshallbepunishedbyafineofnotmore thantwothousandsixhundredfiftydollars ($2,650.00) nineh,,n,Jro,J deii, ($99900) orbincarcerationnottoexceedoner'e— zT°T y hundredeighty (180) daysorbybothsuchfineandincarceration. 2. Anypersonundereighteen (18) yearsofageconvictedof violatinganyprovisionofthiscodemaybepunishedbyafineofnotmore thantwothousandsixhundredfiftydollars ($2,650.00) nineh, pror! RiRetyRiRe-deaFs ($999Anypersonundertheageofeighteen (18) yearsconvictedofviolatinganyprovisionofthemodeltrafficcode adoptedbysection7-1-1ofthiscodemaybepunishedbyafineofnot morethanthreehundreddollars ($300.00) orbyincarcerationnotto exceedninety (90) days, orbybothsuchfineandincarceration. Anysuch personshallbeguiltyofaseparateoffenseforeachandeverydayduring OrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013 9/17/2013 anyportionofwhichaviolationofanyprovisionofthiscodeiscommitted, continued, orpermittedbysuchpersonandshallbepunishedaccordingly. Section2. Section4-12-20.AoftheVailTownCode, imposingpenaltiesfor violationsofthesexuallyorientedbusinessregulations, isherebyamendedasfollows: A. Itshallbeunlawfulforanyperson, corporationorotherentityto violateanyprovisionofthischapter, andanysuchviolationshallbe subjecttothepenaltiessetforthinSection1-4-1ofthisCodea-#+ne nnrrGt tG_ e4veed A i.. Aeh1i-.1TraF 4 rPavlliTaTO ($999.n °and imnricnnmentfnronerindnettoevneednnehundredeighty (1Stn) daysnr hn anh enr! imnricnRFRent QedthatnnneFSeRWAQerrttheage efeighteep,(181, yearsfonoshallahjenttoimnricnnmr°urnr Eachand everydayofviolationoftheprovisionsofthischaptershallconstitutea separateoffensepunishableassuch. Section3. Section6-3H-11oftheVailTownCode, imposingpenaltiesfor assaultweaponsviolations, isherebyamendedasfollows: 6-3H-11: PENALTY: AnypersonwhoisconvictedofviolatinganyprovisionofthisArticleshall bepunishedasprovidedinSection1-4-1ofthisCodeby ofineofnn+ leoothennneh,iAcirpcirinllero /Q1nnnn\ nermerethenninehiinrlrer! ca—crvr1- RiReti. dellars ($999.00) andotermofinnornerotinnofnotIeccthan ten (10) daysnnrmerethennneh1inrlredeighty /1Stn\ days. Section4. Section6-4-23.13oftheVailTownCode, imposingpenaltiesfor animalcontrolviolations, isherebyamendedasfollows: B. Theabove-statedfinesareminimumpenaltiesandallviolationsare subjecttothegeneralpenaltiessetforthinSection1-4-1ofthisCode nnehipdredeighty (1Stn) daysinieil Section5. Section6-4A-10.BoftheVailTownCode, imposingpenaltiesfor carriageviolations, isherebyamendedasfollows: B. ImpositionOfPenalty; RevocationOfPermit: Theabovestated finesareminimumpenaltiesandallviolationsaresubjecttothegeneral penaltiessetforthinSection1-4-1ofthisCodefinenrn„icinncofUp +n eonethte —AA. rinller /Q1nonnn fineand/oriintoonehi-Adreegh 180) daysORjail. Thereshallbeamandatoryrevocationofacarriage operation'spermituponathirdviolationofthisarticlewithinaneighteen 18) monthperiodoftime. Section6. Ifanypart, section, subsection, sentence, clauseorphraseofthis ordinanceisforanyreasonheldtobeinvalid, suchdecisionshallnoteffectthevalidity OrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013 9/17/2013 oftheremainingportionsofthisordinance; andtheCouncilherebydeclaresitwould havepassedthisordinance, andeachpart, section, subsection, sentence, clauseor phrasethereof, regardlessofthefactthatanyoneormoreparts, sections, subsections, sentences, clausesorphrasesbedeclaredinvalid. Section7. TheCouncilherebyfinds, determinesanddeclaresthatthis ordinanceisnecessaryandproperforthehealth, safetyandwelfareoftheTownand theinhabitantsthereof. Section8. TheamendmentofanyprovisionoftheTownCodeasprovidedin thisordinanceshallnotaffectanyrightwhichhasaccrued, anydutyimposed, any violationthatoccurredpriortotheeffectivedatehereof, anyprosecutioncommenced, noranyotheractionorproceedingascommencedunderorbyvirtueoftheprovision amended. Theamendmentofanyprovisionherebyshallnotreviveanyprovisionor anyordinancepreviouslyrepealedorsupersededunlessexpresslystatedherein. Section9. Allbylaws, orders, resolutionsandordinances, orpartsthereof, inconsistentherewitharerepealedtotheextentonlyofsuchinconsistency. This repealershallnotbeconstruedtoreviseanybylaw, order, resolutionorordinance, or partthereof, theretoforerepealed. INTRODUCED, READONFIRSTREADING, APPROVED, ANDORDERED PUBLISHEDONCEINFULLONFIRSTREADINGthis17thdayofSeptember, 2013 andapublichearingforsecondreadingofthisOrdinancesetforthe 1St dayofOctober, 2013, intheCouncilChambersoftheVailMunicipalBuilding, Vail, Colorado. AndrewP. Daly, Mayor ATTEST: TammyNagel, ActingTownClerk OrdinanceNo. 14, Seriesof2013 9/17/2013 TOWNOfVAV VAILTOWNCOUNCILAGENDAMEMO MEETINGDATE: September17, 2013 ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (7:15p.m.) 9/17/2013