HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-05-06 Agenda and Support Documentation Town Council Evening SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING SESSION AGENDA
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
75 S. Frontage Road W.
Vail, CO 81657
6:00 P.M., MAY 6, 2014
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot
be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider
an item.
1. ITEM/TOPIC: Citizen Participation (15 min.)
2.
ITEM/TOPIC: Consent Agenda:
1) Approval of Council Meeting Minutes from April 1, 2014 and April 15, 2014
2) Proclamation No. 2 declaring the month of May 2014 as "Building Safety
Month" (Martin Haeberle)
3) Proclamation No. 3 declaring May as National Physical Fitness and Sports
Month as sponsored by Colorado Governor's Council for Active and Healthy
Lifestyles
4) Parking Equipment Contract (Mike Rose) (5 min.)
3. ITEM/TOPIC: Town Managers Report (5 min. )
4.
ITEM/TOPIC: I-70 Vail Underpass Update (75 min.)
PRESENTER(S): Tom Kassmel
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review the reevaluated intersection
configurations based on traffic movement operations goal of LOS D, and
endorse an intersection type for both the North and South Frontage Roads.
BACKGROUND: The I-70 Vail Underpass is a proposed new multi-modal
pedestrian and vehicular connection that is midway between Main Vail and
West Vail exits, passing under I-70. This underpass has been identified in the
Vail Transportation Master Plan (VTMP). The design team previously
presented the traffic analysis for the underpass intersections. After much
discussion, Council directed the design team to reevaluate three specific
intersection configurations using only a traffic movement operations goal of
Level of Service (LOS) D for ideal conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council endorse the
recommended Compact Roundabout / Roundabout intersection
configuration.
5. ITEM/TOPIC: The purpose of this item is to present Phase II of the Town of
Vail’s Facility Wide Energy Conservation Project through use of LED lighting
technology, supported by Holy Cross Energy’s Think BIG Grant. (15 min)
PRESENTER(S): Greg Hall
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide direction to staff regarding 5/6/2014
moving forward with final project implementation.
BACKGROUND: Phase II Energy Project is a continuing effort by the Town
of Vail to meet the adopted goal of 20% energy savings by 2020. The project
is funded in part through grants and rebates from Holy Cross Energy. See
memo for specifics of the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Vail Town Council
direct staff to proceed to finalize the neighborhood streetlight design and
enter into a contract for Phase II of the Facility -Wide Energy Conservation
Project up to $ 543,868, and to supplement the budget up to $156,981
additional dollars from the capital projects fund balance.
6.
ITEM/TOPIC: First reading of Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, an
ordinance repealing and reenacting the approved development plan for
Phase III of Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to
Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an
increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing
dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village
Inn, Phase III) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. (PEC130046) (20 min.)
PRESENTER(S): Jonathan Spence
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall
approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 11, Series of
2014, upon first reading.
BACKGROUND: On March 24, 2014, the Planning and Environmental
Commission reviewed the proposal to add approximately 792 square feet of
GRFA to Units 501 and 502 of Vail Village Inn, Phase III. The Commission
offered comments on the proposal with regard to the need to evaluate the
proposal pursuant to the criteria, the new roof elements and the need to tie
the south roof element to the balcony below. The Commission, at the
applicant’s request, tabled the item to April 14, 2014. On April 14, 2014, the
Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the
request for a recommendation on a major amendment to add GRFA to Units
501 and 502. The Commission forwarded a recommend of approval, with
conditions, to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to SDD No.6,
Vail Village Inn, to increase the allowable GRFA for Phase III, with a vote of
7-0-0. This recommendation was based upon the review of the criteria
outlined in the April 14, 2014 memorandum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission, and the evidence and testimony presented.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Environmental
Commission recommends the Vail Town Council approves Ordinance No.
11, Series of 2014, upon first reading.
7.
ITEM/TOPIC: Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 A Resolution Approving
the Purchase of Property in the Town of Vail Legally Described as Unit 11,
Vail Heights Condominiums, Eagle County, Colorado with a Physical
Address of 2079 Chamonix Lane No. 11, Vail, Colorado; and Setting Forth
Details in Regard Thereto. (10 min. )
PRESENTER(S): Nina Timm
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Resolution
No. 16, Series of 2014 5/6/2014
BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum
8. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (Estimated 8:30 p.m.)
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: Citizen Participation
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: Consent Agenda:
1) Approval of Council Meeting Minutes from April 1, 2014 and April 15, 2014
2) Proclamation No. 2 declaring the month of May 2014 as "Building Safety Month" (Martin
Haeberle)
3) Proclamation No. 3 declaring May as National Physical Fitness and Sports Month as
sponsored by Colorado Governor's Council for Active and Healthy Lifestyles
4) Parking Equipment Contract (Mike Rose)
ATTACHMENTS:
April 1 Council Meeting Minutes
Minutes from April 15, 2014
Proclamation No. 2, Series of 2014
Proclamation No. 3, Series of 2014
Parking Equipment Contract
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 1, 2014 Page 1
Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
6:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by
Mayor Andy Daly.
Members present: Andy Daly, Mayor
Margaret Rogers
Greg Moffet
Jenn Bruno
Dave Chapin
Dale Bugby
Member absent: Ludwig Kurz
Staff members: Stan Zemler, Town Manager
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
Tammy Nagel, Deputy Clerk
_________________________________________________________________
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. There was none.
The second item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda.
1) Approval of the March 4 and March 18 meeting minutes.
Bugby reviewed his recommended changes to the March 4 and the March 18
meeting minutes. All council members agreed with the changes. Moffet made
a motion to approve the March 4 meeting minutes with the recommended
changes, with a second from Chapin. The motion passed unanimously 6-0.
Moffet made a motion to approve the March 18 meeting minutes with the
recommended changes, with a second from Chapin. The motion passed
unanimously 6-0.
2) Resolution No. 11, Series of 2014, A Resolution Approving an Amended
Operating Plan and Budget of the Vail Local Marketing District, for its Fiscal
Year January 1, 2014. Moffet made a motion to approve the resolution, with a
second from Rogers. The motion passed unanimously 6-0.
3) Pre-Construction Management Contract Award. Moffet made a motion to
direct the Town Manager to enter into a Construction Manager/General
Contractor with GE Johnson for the Vail Village Welcome Center remodel,
with a second from Rogers. The motion passed unanimously 6-0.
The third item on the agenda was the Town Manager’s Report. There was none.
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 1, 2014 Page 2
The fourth item on the agenda was I-70 Vail Underpass Traffic update. Town Engineer
Tom Kassmel stated that as a part of the project design process, a traffic operations
analysis had been completed for the I-70 Vail Underpass and the two new intersections
it would create. The traffic analysis was based on the adopted 2009 Vail Transportation
Master Plan (VTMP), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) requirements and guidelines, and recognized
traffic engineering best practices. Kassmel explained the data and assumptions for the
traffic analysis were based on the VTMP and include the 20 year design traffic service
life, the 15th busiest day, the VTMP traffic projections and the level of service (LOS).
Rogers asked what the 15th busiest traffic day was in Vail. Kassmel explained that it’s
not a specific date. The 15th busiest day was based on the significant holidays and
Special Events, the snow levels, the number of days Vail hotels are occupied and the
number of days in a year that Vail had overflow parking on the Frontage Roads. Mark
Meisinger, Engineer with Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig (FHU), reviewed several intersection
configurations with council: the Traditional T would allow the Frontage Roads to flow
freely and the underpass traffic would be required to stop; an All-way Stop T where all
directions stop; a Modified T which would allow the underpass to free flow and the
Frontage Roads to stop, similar to Blue Cow Chute; an All-way Stop T with Bypass
provided two Frontage Road movements being free flow and all other movements stop;
a Signalized T would have all movement stops at signals; a Single Lane Roundabout;
and a Single Lane Roundabout with an auxiliary lane. Meisinger demonstrated how a
single lane roundabout with an auxiliary lane met the 20 year design traffic life and the
FHWA/CDOT requirements and guidelines. Rogers asked what would prevent the town
making changes to the Bypass T in 2030 if the town was incorrect on its choice.
Kassmel stated the funding agreement with CDOT required the 20 year design traffic
life. All council members questioned the traffic data that was used for the traffic
analysis. Daly explained the traffic numbers would be the same, but the additional
underpass would relieve congestion on both the main Vail and West Vail roundabouts.
Rick Rejavec with FHU reviewed evaluation criteria with council. All types of T
Intersections did not provide adequate LOS or queues at intersections. A Single Lane
Roundabout accommodated ideal conditions at LOS C, had acceptable queues and
reduced impact to private property, but it did not accommodate snowy conditions at
LOS D. A Single Lane Roundabout with an Auxiliary Lane accommodated Ideal
conditions at LOS C, had acceptable queues, and it accommodated snowy conditions at
LOS D. Rogers asked if the town could ban trucks from using that roundabout.
Kassmel said at minimum large trucks would have to be able to go through the
roundabout. Bruno asked if the engineers considered a roundabout on one side and a
tee on the other. Rejavec said this model had not been done. Bugby questioned if
some of the traffic projections were using double counts. Kassmel said he would
confirm the numbers. Daly asked for public comment. Bill Pierce, owner at Simba Run,
questioned if the numbers used in the analysis were realistic for a 20 year outlook.
Pierce explained a LOS C rating is based on a 10-20 second stop and a LOS D is a wait
of 40 seconds per vehicle. Additionally Pierce did not agree with CDOT’s study that
roundabouts were safer. Charlie Calcaterra, representing Simba Run Homeowners
Association, said there was an opportunity for the town to do what is right by relieving
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 1, 2014 Page 3
traffic from the west and main roundabouts. Calcaterra felt there were two scenarios
that would satisfy everyone. If the town would use CDOTS level of service for this
project only, it would allow a T Intersection to be implemented or if the Council would
agree to do the T Intersection and if the intersection failed in 15 years then add a light
signal. With no further public comment, Daly asked if council had any additional
comments. Bugby said a T Intersection would be appropriate for this project. Rogers
felt the bypass T would allow for reasonable growth. Moffet reminded council that Vail
did have design requirements and there are no traffic lights allowed. Moffet went onto
say a T Intersection did not work unless the town would allow traffic lights. The town
needed to be consistent with the same standards that are applied to general
developers. Bruno also had problems with the numbers used for the analysis and
would like the engineers to pursue the Bypass T. Daly requested staff to re-examine
the traffic counts and confirm there was no double counting. Additionally, Daly
requested staff provide scenarios using LOS D for a Bypass T, single roundabout on the
North Frontage Road and double T on both North and South Frontage Roads.
The fifth item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2014,
An Ordinance Making Budget Adjustments to the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital
Projects Fund, Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, Conference Center Fund, Dispatch
Services Fund, Heavy Equipment Fund, Debt Service Fund and Timber Ridge
Enterprise Fund of the 2014 Budget for the Town of Vail. Daly questioned if the $13,200
to fund the transportation costs to move sports teams to other field locations during the
Ford Park Field construction was the Vail Recreation District’s responsibility. Rogers
explained it was a small cost to the town to ensure the events return to Vail next year.
Moffet expressed concern regarding the $17,200 in police officers overtime relating to
work done for the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). There was no public comment.
Moffet made a motion to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 10, with a second
from Rogers. The motion passed unanimously 6-0.
The sixth item on the agenda was review of the proposed Timber Ridge Development
Agreement. Community Development Director George Ruther presented council
Resolution No. 9, Series of 2014, A Resolution Approving a Timber Ridge Development
Agreement, and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. Daly questioned the
performance bond language in the development agreement. Town Attorney Matt Mire
explained if the developer was unable to complete the project, the lender would finish
the development with a new developer. Moffet moved to approve Resolution No. 9 and
direct the Town Manager to enter into the Developers Agreement with Lion's Ridge
Apartment Homes, LLC, with a second from Chapin. There was no public comment.
The motion passed unanimously 6-0.
The seventh item on the agenda was Resolution No. 12, Series of 2014, A Resolution
Authorizing the Town Manager to Enter into a Professional Service Agreement with
Reconstruction Experts, Inc. for the Renovation of Units at the Timber Ridge Village
Apartments. Ruther informed council concerning the need to complete interior
renovations to at least nine dwelling units at the Timber Ridge Village Apartments. The
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 1, 2014 Page 4
renovation work is expected to start in early April and to be fully completed by April 30,
2104. Ruther said that since a large number of units will become vacant during the
month of April that this is the correct time to complete renovation work. The estimated
total cost of the work is approximately $188,000. Bugby asked the lifespan on the
buildings that are being renovated. Ruther stated those buildings are not currently
being considered for construction and will be around for a long period of time to allow
the pay down from the new construction. Moffet made a motion to pass Resolution No.
12 and direct the Town Manager to enter into the service agreement, with a second
from Rogers. There was no public comment. The motion passes unanimously 6-0.
The eighth item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance No. 8, Series of
2014, An Ordinance for Prescribing Regulation Amendments, Pursuant to Section 12-3-
7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to Amend Section 12-2-2:Definitions of Words and
Terms Pertaining to Commercial Ski Storage and the Delineation of Different Floors or
Levels within a Structure, and to Amend Sections 12-7B, 12-7H, 12-7I and 12-8E
Replacing the Term “Commercial Ski Storage” with “Commercial Ski Storage/Ski Club”
and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. Community Development Planner
Jonathan Spence informed council there were no significant changes made since the
first reading of Ordinance No. 8. Moffet made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 8 on
second reading with a second by Rogers. There was no public comment. The motion
passed unanimously 6-0.
The ninth item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance No. 9, Series of
2014, An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Properties from the High Density Multiple-Family
District to the Vail Village Townhouse District, Located at 303 Gore Creek Drive (Vail
Rowhouse 7-13) and 483 Gore Creek Drive (Texas Townhomes)/Lots 7-13, A
Resubdivision of Block 5 and a Part of Gore Creek Drive, Vail Village Filing 1, and Lots
1-9 Vail Village Filing 4, and Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto. Spence stated
there were no changes made to the ordinance since the first reading. Moffet made a
motion to approve Ordinance No. 9 on second reading with a second from Bugby.
There was no public comment. The motion passed unanimously 6-0.
The Tenth item on the agenda was adjournment. Moffet mad a motion to adjourn with
a second from Rogers. The motion passed unanimously and council adjourned at 9:01
p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Attest: __________________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
___________________________________
Tammy Nagel, Deputy Clerk
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 15, 2014 Page 1
Vail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
6:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by
Mayor Andy Daly.
Members present: Andy Daly, Mayor
Ludwig Kurz
Margaret Rogers
Greg Moffet
Jenn Bruno
Dave Chapin
Dale Bugby
Staff members: Pam Brandmeyer, Acting Town Manager
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
_________________________________________________________________
The first item on the agenda was the 2013 L. Anthony Sutin Civic Imagination Award
Presentation. Chief Dwight Henninger, Vail Police Chief, and Megan McGee Bonta, Catholic
Charities, were presented the “L. Anthony Sutin Civic Imagination Award”, in recognition of their
partnership and work together building bridges with the immigrant community in Vail in an effort
to create trusting relationships between law enforcement agencies, social service agencies and
the residents they serve. Director Ronald Davis, US Dept. of Justice Office of Community
Oriented Policing Services, and US Attorney John Walsh, Colorado District Attorney’s Office,
were present to recognize these individuals and all those involved in helping to implement a
community that collaboratively works together on solving problems facing the immigrant
residents. High accolades were given to both individuals with recognition to Catholic Charities’
initiative in implementing a very active Eagle County Immigration Advisory Committee formed to
help to address such apparent needs of this community. In addition recognition of Chief
Henninger’s outstanding commitment to his community and profession was noted in helping to
successfully bridge the gap that has existed between the police and immigrant community. It
was noted that the award was named in memory of Tony Sutin, who served as a founder and
Deputy Director of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, and that these
nominees have shown the ability to create sustainable collaborations that are innovative and
creative and that they’ve shown civic leadership through problem solving and collaborative
partnerships, and finally that that they’ve shown the ability to institutionalize sustainable,
positive; observable public safety outcomes that promote public safety through a dedication to
the community policing philosophy. Mayor Daly commended the nominees noting that the
community of Vail is unique and complex in many ways and that their dedication and work has
helped make it a better place to live for all persons including the immigrant community.
The second item on the agenda was Citizen Participation, comments were heard as follows:
Chuck Ogilby, Vail resident, former council member, expressed support for the upcoming ballot
questions proposed by Eagle River Fire Protection District’s May election, questions that
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 15, 2014 Page 2
addressed: 1) General Obligation (GO, property tax) increase to help offset costs related to
capital project infrastructure upgrades, and 2) Taxpayer Bill of Rights exemption. He expressed
concerns with water quality of the Gore Creek noting that the new state and federal regulations
would only help improve the “state of the rivers.” He also requested the town consider
reviewing more stringent rules related to tree spraying and ensuring the most stringent
regulations are proposed for cleaning up Gore Creek. Mayor Daly noted the town has already
made a commitment to this effort and has begun implementing its “water quality improvement
plan” which outlines many measures addressing this topic.
The third item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda.
George Ruther presented the following 2 items:
1) Resolution No. 10, 2014 - Timber Ridge Rockfall Mitigation Contract
Moffet moved to approve Resolution No. 10, with a second from Kurz. The motion
passed unanimously, 7-0.
2) Resolution No. 13, 2014 - Timber Ridge Holy Cross Energy Easement
Moffet moved to approve Resolution No. 13, with a second from Kurz. The motion
passed unanimously, 7-0.
Ruther noted that the rockfall mitigation work would begin May 1 and press releases and
variable message signs would be used immediately to help notify the neighborhood and public
of the work to be done. He also noted that no helicopters or blasting would be required.
The fourth item on the agenda was Town Manager’s Report. Chief Henninger presented an
update on the police activity that occurred during this past weekend’s event, and specifically the
activity they responded to as a result of the Saturday night concert. He noted that when
compared with other events and concerts in Vail, this event presented many challenges for both
enforcement and medical personnel. While the event was successful in terms of the number of
people that attended, there were many challenges with the event itself.
The fifth item on the agenda was a request to proceed through the development review process
with a proposal to install a fence on the Town owned parcel in the Intermountain neighborhood
at the West Vail Community Garden as presented by Marion Carton, President. The slideshow
presentation provided information about their mission, background, location, history of its
improvements, community involvement, and now the need for a fence to keep the deer away in
order to remain a successful garden. It was noted that other deterrent means have been tried
with no success. Numerous reasons for a fence were outlined, including: 1) enhance safety
measures, 2) enhance wildlife and garden protection, 3) serve as dog deterrent, 4) provide
definition of the space and screens, and 5) add some visual appeal with fencing around the
entire garden. If there was permission to proceed with the request, it was noted that the
applicant would need to file a request for a variance from Section 14-10-9, Fences, Hedges,
Walls, and Screening, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12-17, Variances, to allow for
deviations from the fence height limitations. There was some discussion about the height of the
fence in terms of what other community gardens have installed, what has been successful in
terms of the height (typically at least 7 feet), and what type of fence materials were being
considered. Jeff Schneider, resident and user of the garden, spoke in support of the project and
request to proceed with a request for the fencing in light of it serving to improve the ability of the
community garden in being successful. There were no other public comments. Moffet moved to
approve the applicant’s request to proceed through the development review process. Ludwig
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously 7-0. Carton expressed her sincere
thanks to the council, to the community and to town staff for their support and efforts on the
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 15, 2014 Page 3
project. She also noted that the related costs are estimated at $9500, and that the group may
seek funding assistance from the town in order to implement the purchase and installation of the
fence.
The sixth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 14, Series of 2014 - A Resolution
Establishing the Annual Fee in Lieu Amount for Commercial Linkage and Inclusionary Zoning.
Nina Timm, Community Development, presented this item highlighting that in 2007 the Vail
Town Council established commercial linkage and inclusionary zoning requirements that
outlined one of the five methods to provide the requisite employee housing is payment of a fee
in lieu. She noted that in order to remain In accordance with Vail Town Code Sections 12-23-6
and 12-24-6, the fee in lieu amounts should be established annually by resolution of the Vail
Town Council. She spoke briefly .about the calculation as it related to using the Area Median
Income and real estate prices per square foot as depicted in the council packet memo. Moffet
expressed concern about the methodology behind the calculations and the impacts that are
brought on by a rising real estate market. Moffet moved to table Resolution No. 14, Series of
2014, in order to schedule further discussion about the details of the policy. He requested that
the topic be scheduled for work session on May 6th. Ludwig seconded the motion. There were
some council inquiries about how the calculations were developed. There were no public
comments on this topic. The motion passed unanimously 7-0.
The seventh item on the agenda was the Second reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series 2014,
Ordinance making budget adjustments to the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund,
Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, Conference Center Fund, Dispatch Services Fund, Heavy
Equipment Fund, Debt Service Fund and Timber Ridge Enterprise Fund. Kathleen Halloran
presented this item with a review of the changes from first reading that included General Fund
changes as follows:
$11,000 request to update the town’s emergency preparedness operations plan. A consultant
frequently used within Eagle County would be hired to prepare a strategic plan identifying an
emergency response approach based on national models (FEMA’s Incident Command
System format) in order to bring the town’s plan concurrent with the county’s updated plan.
Staff would review whether or not this funding couldn’t be included in 2015 budget as
requested by Daly.
$70,000 request to fund a resort competitiveness study to be completed by RRC Associates,
who would perform a review of existing research, develop a competitive assessment (peer
resort visits, analysis of infrastructure/facilities, etc.) and recommend actions. Rogers asked
the plan be completed per the Council’s strategic plan discussion. Daly asked why the
proposal was divided into 2 sections. Chris Cares, RRC, responded to questions explaining
their idea was to build on the existing work as well as capturing all other broader information
sources into one document, including nationally ski industry research and information. Bugby
questioned whether the marketing district should be funding the work; Rogers noted this
background work would serve the Council in many capacities and said that it would then be
likely to present possible marketing initiatives to the district with funding opportunities.
The Capital Projects Fund changes included the following:
$246,000, during the April 1st Council meeting, an acceleration of street light replacement
project was approved for replacement of light fixtures throughout town. Budgeted
expenditures would increase by this amount.
5/6/2014
Town Council Meeting Minutes of April 15, 2014 Page 4
$25,000 is requested for additional conceptual design, program analysis and potential legal
costs should the town continue plans for a municipal site redevelopment.
$7,550 is requested to supplement the $5,000 originally budgeted in 2014 for the Chamonix
Housing Market study. Earlier this year the town contracted with Rees Consulting for this
work.
With no further questions or comments, Moffet moved to approve on second reading Ordinance
No. 10, Series 2014 as read; Rogers seconded the motion. There were no public comments.
The motion passed unanimously 7-0.
The eighth item on the agenda was adjournment. There being no further business to come
before the council, Rogers moved to adjourn with a second from Moffet. The motion passed
unanimously, 7-0 and the meeting adjourned at 7 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Attest: __________________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
___________________________________
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
5/6/2014
PROCLAMATION NO. 2, SERIES OF 2014
A PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF MAY 2014
AS “BUILDING SAFETY MONTH”
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail holds the critical issues of safety, energy efficiency,
and resilience in the built environment as essential elements of a viable community; and
WHEREAS, our confidence is achieved through the devotion of vigilant
architects, engineers, builders, and others in the construction industry, who work year-
round to ensure the safe construction of buildings; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail adopted the 2012 editions of the International
Building and Fire Codes by reference in Title 10, Building Codes, Vail Town Code, to
protect public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, Building Safety Month is to remind the public about the critical role of
our communities’ local code officials, who assure us of safe, efficient and livable
buildings; and
WHEREAS, the theme for Building Safety Month 2014 is “Maximizing Resilience,
Minimizing Risk”
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the Vail Town Council declares
the month of May as Building Safety Month.
SIGNED this 6th day of May, 2014.
________________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
5/6/2014
Proclamation No. 3, Series of 2014
A Proclamation Declaring National Physical Education and Sport Week from May 1-7
and May as National Physical Fitness and Sports Month
Whereas, the Town of Vail along with the Colorado Governor’s Council for Active and
Healthy Lifestyles recommends this special week focuses on the value of physical education
and activity in the lives of children and adults;
Whereas, this year's theme is "Let's Shape America through Dance!";
Whereas, regular physical activity is necessary to support normal and healthy growth in
children;
Whereas, research shows that fit and active children are more likely to thrive
academically;
Whereas, participation in sports and physical activity improves self-esteem and body
image in children and adults;
Whereas, the Colorado Governor’s Council for active and healthy lifestyles goals are to
promote and support events and programs that encourage physical fitness and educate citizens
on the lifelong benefits of an active, healthy lifestyle.
Now, therefore, be it resolved this 6th day of May 2014 the Vail Town Council joins the
Colorado Governor’s Council in proclaiming National Physical Education and Sport Week as
May 1-7 and May as National Physical Fitness and Sports Month. The Vail Town Council
encourages parents and teachers to help children explore a wide variety of physical activities to
determine what they like and encourage them to participate in those activities on a regular
basis. The physical activity-inspired week begins the physical fitness and sports inspired month
to renew their commitment to make regular physical activity a part of their lives and quality
physical education programs a part of this community’s schools.
Town of Vail, Colorado
_______________________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
5/6/2014
To: Vail Town Council
From: Mike Rose, Parking and Transportation
Date: April 24, 2014
Subject: Parking Equipment Contract Approval
Introduction
The staff updated the Vail Town Council on February 4, 2014 regarding the parking structure
equipment replacement project.
Background Rational
The town received seven proposals for the replacement of the parking equipment at the structures,
Ford Park and the soccer field. The proposals were evaluated by a team from Finance, Parking and
IT. ProtectionTech from Denver Colorado was selected, the equipment provided is manufactured by
SkiData. Total contract price is $600,000.00, the package includes replacement of existing equipment
plus license plate recognition, pay on foot stations, value card recharging via the internet or at the
structures and improved revenue control for summer special event parking. The project will be
completed and operational for this winter season.
Action Requested of Town Council
Approve, approve with modifications or deny.
Staff recommendation
Staff recommends the Vail Town Council approve the Town Manager to enter into a contract with
ProtectionTech for $600,000.00.
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: Town Managers Report
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: I-70 Vail Underpass Update
PRESENTER(S): Tom Kassmel
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review the reevaluated intersection configurations
based on traffic movement operations goal of LOS D, and endorse an intersection type for
both the North and South Frontage Roads.
BACKGROUND: The I-70 Vail Underpass is a proposed new multi-modal pedestrian and
vehicular connection that is midway between Main Vail and West Vail exits, passing under I-
70. This underpass has been identified in the Vail Transportation Master Plan (VTMP). The
design team previously presented the traffic analysis for the underpass intersections. After
much discussion, Council directed the design team to reevaluate three specific intersection
configurations using only a traffic movement operations goal of Level of Service (LOS) D for
ideal conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council endorse the recommended
Compact Roundabout / Roundabout intersection configuration.
ATTACHMENTS:
Memo
Presentation
Traffic Districbution Memo & Figures
2040 PM Level of Service
5/6/2014
To: Town Council
From: Public Works Department
Date: 5-6-14
Subject: I-70 Vail Underpass Project Intersection Recommendation
I. BACKGROUND
The I-70 Vail Underpass is a proposed new multimodal pedestrian and vehicular
connection that is midway between Main Vail and West Vail exits, passing under I-70.
This underpass has been identified in the Vail Transportation Master Plan (VTMP) and
the CDOT I-70 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) as a critical link
between the North and South Frontage Road. The Town and CDOT have recently
entered into a Letter of Commitment and an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) to
jointly fund the design and construction of this project with an expected completion date
of December of 2017. CDOT, the Town of Vail, and the selected design consultant,
Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig (FHU), have begun the design process based on the recently
endorsed preferred location of the underpass and will provide an update of the traffic
analysis to Town Council. For reference each of the past Town Council presentations
and Council meeting video links along with additional project information is available at
the project website at www.vailgov.com/underpass
At the April 1st Town Council meeting, the design team presented the traffic analysis for
the underpass intersections. After much discussion, Council directed the design team
to reevaluate three specific intersection configurations using only a traffic movement
operations goal of Level of Service (LOS) D for ideal conditions. The LOS D goal will
meet the design criteria for CDOT and FHWA; however it will be a deviation from the
VTMP recommended LOS levels of C for ideal conditions and D for snowy conditions.
The three intersection configurations that were requested to be evaluated for the North
Frontage Rd/South Frontage Rd intersections are;
• T Intersection with WB Bypass / T Intersection with EB Bypass
• T Intersection with WB Bypass / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane
• Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane
The purpose of this Council session is to review the reevaluated intersection
configurations based on traffic movement operations goal of LOS D, and endorse an
intersection type for both the North and South Frontage Roads.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 2
II. INTERSECTION EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
As discussed at the April 1st Council meeting the traffic operations as well as many
other relating factors must be considered when evaluating the design of the two
intersections at the proposed underpass. In order to better evaluate this design
decision, the Project Staff and the Project Leadership Team developed Evaluation
Criteria for this decision.
• Intersection traffic design/service life meets the 20 year traffic projections
• Intersection traffic Level of Service meets Vail revised criteria and FHWA/CDOT
criteria at the new underpass locations and at nearby impacted intersections
• Conforms with Vail’s comprehensive plans and planning objectives
• Mitigates/minimizes safety issues (Vehicular, Pedestrian, Bicyclist, Transit)
• Minimizes maintenance impacts (Snow removal, Landscaping, Long term Mtn.
Costs)
• Provides adequate access for adjacent properties and community wide for
pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles
• Mitigates/minimizes environmental Impacts (Noise, Lighting, Property,
Accessibility, Water Quality, etcB)
• Provides enhanced aesthetics meeting Vail standards
• Provides scalability if needed in the future for increased traffic operations
• Minimizes construction cost, Right of Way acquisition, and duration
In order to complete this evaluation the design team reviewed conceptual layouts for
each of the 4 options (attached) and intersection traffic analyses for each option. The
traffic volumes and calculated Levels of Service and queue lengths are also attached.
Please note that the traffic LOS criteria for evaluation was revised based on Council
request to meet a LOS of D during ideal conditions. The traffic diagrams do show
snowy conditions to provide additional information.
Based on the above criteria, three intersection configurations requested by Council
were evaluated, as well as a fourth new option. The options include the following
configurations (north / south);
• T Intersection with WB Bypass / T Intersection with EB Bypass
• T Intersection with WB Bypass / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane
• Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane
• Compact Roundabout / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane (new concept)
The first three options were discussed at the previous Council session. The fourth
option includes a Compact Roundabout at the north intersection which is relatively new
to the United States and is not found on any state owned roadway facilities within
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 3
Colorado. Recently, in the past ten years, this type of compact roundabout has been
implemented in many private developments and locally owned road networks. Locally
this can be seen along Beard/Berry Creek Road in Edwards, the northernmost
roundabout at the Edwards interchange.
Compact roundabouts are generally up to 30% smaller than typical single lane
roundabouts. A typical single lane roundabout which accommodates all truck
movements has a diameter of 130’ to 180’. The compact roundabout in Edwards and
the one proposed in this option is ~105’ in diameter. The reduction in size directly
relates to the ability to landscape the center island and limits the ability for large trucks
to make all traffic movements unless the center island remains un-landscaped.
After some discussion regarding compact roundabouts, the design team along with
CDOT and FHWA believe that this may be an appropriate site to propose a compact
roundabout. The compact roundabout will provide the same traffic operation benefits as
a standard single lane roundabout, with the exception of allowing all truck turning
movements. The design limitations on the truck turning movements with be further
discussed with CDOT and FHWA, the outcome will directly impact the ability to
landscape a small center island. Currently the intent would be to have a small center
landscaped island similar in size and scale to the north Main Vail roundabout.
Evaluation of 4 Options:
Each of the four options can be summarized as follows;
T Intersection with WB Bypass / T Intersection with EB Bypass;
• An unfamiliar intersection configuration, a couple statewide examples can be
seen at the intersection of US 285 and US 24 (south of Buena Vista), and at DIA
(near gas station), both signalized versions.
• All traffic movements meet the traffic operations goal of LOS D at north
intersection, but not at south intersection, where the WB through movement is
expected to operate at LOS F. This option also introduces queue between each
intersection that may impact operations at peak times under all way stop control.
• Requires 4 lanes of traffic beneath the underpass to accommodate turn lanes
and queue lengths adding to the I-70 bridge span lengths.
• Reduces the area of impact on Simba Run Condominiums property; however it
extends the impacts along the length of the property, significantly impacting
driveway access flexibility. The Simba Run driveway will get closer to the east
building and the Savoy Villas driveway enters at the by-pass merge point,
therefore potentially requiring this driveway to be restricted to right in-right out
and/or being moved west onto Timber Ridge property.
• Can be designed to minimize safety and maintenance concerns, however this will
introduce a mid-block pedestrian/bicycle crossing across the bypass lanes, an
unfavorable condition similar to crosswalks at the Municipal Building, and the Ritz
Carlton,
• Aesthetically challenging, as it is very linear and functional in design and has
limited areas for landscape that can break up the intersection design.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 4
• Scalable to a degree. The most practical way to increase capacity in this type of
design is to add a traffic signal or replace with roundabout at a significant cost.
T Intersection with WB Bypass / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane
• The North Frontage Road T intersection will have the same conditions and
impacts as described above.
• All traffic movements at the south roundabout will operate well at LOS C or
better; however this configuration may lead to increased queue lengths along the
northbound approach of the underpass due to the unrestricted flow from south to
north and a stop condition at the North Frontage Road. This queue will
negatively affect the south roundabouts functionality.
• The south roundabout provides better safety conditions for pedestrians,
bicyclists, and vehicles as compared to the T intersection. This is based on
statewide and national accepted data. Roundabouts reduce vehicular speeds at
all legs, eliminate serious head-on and T-bone accidents, and shorten and
minimize conflict points for all modes.
• The south roundabout provides enhanced aesthetics due to the large landscaped
center island.
• The south roundabout is scalable to a degree. The most practical way to
increase capacity if needed is to enlarge the roundabout; this can be planned for
by placing required retaining walls in locations that allow for a future
enlargement.
Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux.Lane;
• Provides a traffic solution that is familiar in Vail,
• All traffic movements operate well at LOS C or better for both the north and south
intersections.
• Has the largest impacts to private property as compared to the other currently
considered configurations,
• Can be designed to minimize safety and maintenance concerns (Main Vail &
West Vail as examples). Based on actual accident data roundabouts are
considered the safest intersections for all modes of transportation.
• Is aesthetically pleasing,
• Scalable to a degree. The most practical way to increase capacity is to enlarge
the roundabout, this can be planned for by placing required retaining walls in
locations that allow for a future enlargement,
Compact Roundabout / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane;
• Provides a traffic solution that is familiar in Vail. However the North Roundabout
is considered a compact roundabout being approximately 25% smaller than a
typical single lane roundabout. The reduced size does not affect capacity just
landscaping potential.
• All traffic movements operate well at LOS C or better for both the north and south
intersections.
• Has the least physical impacts to private property with regards to area of
encroachment,
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 5
• Can be designed to minimize safety and maintenance concerns (Main Vail &
West Vail as examples). Based on actual accident data roundabouts are
considered the safest intersections for all modes of transportation.
• The north roundabout will have a smaller center island to provide landscaping
and enhanced aesthetics, however the south roundabout may be able to be
much larger providing significantly more landscaping, depending on final design
diameter.
• North roundabout would have limitations on truck turning movements, forcing
larger trucks to go straight along the Frontage Road and not through the
underpass.
• Scalable to a degree. The most practical way to increase capacity is to enlarge
the roundabout, this can be planned for by placing required retaining walls in
locations that allow for a future enlargement,
Recommended Option:
Based on a review of the conceptual design layouts (attached) and the evaluation
criteria matrix (attached), the design team recommends option 4, the Compact
Roundabout / Single Lane Roundabout w/ Aux. Lane. This option will provide for
current and future traffic needs, is an intersection configuration that is familiar within
Vail, provides the safest intersection configuration, provides the least encroachment into
private property, and will provide an aesthetically pleasing design for Vail.
III. NEXT STEPS
Staff is requesting that Council provides input and solicits public feedback regarding the
intersection configuration recommendation; and requests that Council endorse the
recommended intersection configuration.
Once an intersection configuration is endorsed the design team will continue to move
forward in preliminary design and environmental analysis. During preliminary design
and environmental analysis the design team will more thoroughly vet a design solution,
including but not limited to;
• Determining the best horizontal and vertical design location; finding the ‘best fit’
geometric design within the constraints of the endorsed preferred location and
endorsed intersection type, with emphasis to reduce encroachment and impacts
on private property.
• Structural selection for bridges and retaining walls. Taking into account structural
needs, impacts, and aesthetics.
• Project mitigation measures for adjacent properties in close proximity to the
proposed project related to environmental impacts, including Visibility, Noise,
Aesthetics, Lighting, Air and Water Quality.
• 3D interactive rendering will be prepared and presented to the public at a future
Town Council meeting. This model will allow the public to visualize the
underpass and how impacts may be mitigated.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 6
IV. PROJECT PROGRESS SCHEDULE
As we continue thru this collaborative process it is important to note that we are quickly
coming up against a critical milestone within the project’s schedule. In order to provide
adequate time to complete the construction of the project by December of 2017, it is
critical that we complete the preliminary design by August of 2014. This preliminary
design milestone, forces our hand to be starting geometric design of the underpass and
intersection by mid May. The following is a list of key design milestones and more
formal public input opportunities anticipated to occur during the design process. As this
process is dynamic these dates will fluctuate as the project develops;
May 2014 Town Council Update (Intersection Selection)
June 2014 Town Council Update (Design Progress)
August 2014 Town Council Update (Preliminary Design Complete)
September 2014 Open House
October 2014 Town Council Update (Environmental Clearance Update)
March 2015 Town Council Update (Final Design Complete)
March 2015 Open House (Final Design)
March 2015-Jan. 2016 Right of Way plans and property acquisition process
January 2016 Final Environmental Clearance (FHWA)
March-April 2016 Construction Documents, Bid & Award, Open House
May 2016-Dec. 2017 Construction
As the project progresses public input will be taken continuously thru the project website
at www.vailgov.com/underpass and thru specific stakeholders meetings and
correspondence.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council endorse the recommended Compact Roundabout /
Roundabout intersection configuration.
VI. ATTACHMENTS
Presentation
LOS and Queue Length Diagrams
Traffic Trip Generation and Distribution Memo & Figures
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
Ma
y
6
,
2
0
1
4
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
P
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
2
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
•
An
a
l
y
z
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
;
•
L
O
S
D
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
C
D
O
T
/
F
H
W
A
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
•
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
m
e
e
t
V
T
M
P
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
;
LO
S
C
f
o
r
i
d
e
a
l
/
L
O
S
D
f
o
r
sn
o
w
y
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
•
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
4
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
•
3
p
e
r
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
+
1
n
e
w
o
p
t
i
o
n
;
•
B
y
-
p
a
s
s
T
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
/
B
y
-
p
a
s
s
T
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
•
B
y
-
p
a
s
s
T
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
/
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
•
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
/
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
•
C
o
m
p
a
c
t
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
/
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
3
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Co
m
p
a
c
t
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
4
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
Wh
a
t
i
s
a
C
o
m
p
a
c
t
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
?
•
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
n
e
w
i
n
t
h
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
S
t
a
t
e
s
•
N
o
n
e
o
n
C
D
O
T
/
F
H
W
A
s
t
a
t
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
i
n
C
O
•
R
e
c
e
n
t
l
y
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
y
r
o
a
d
sy
s
t
e
m
s
•
L
o
c
a
l
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
:
E
d
w
a
r
d
s
(
~
1
0
5
’
)
•
U
p
t
o
3
0
%
s
m
a
l
l
e
r
•
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
/
s
a
f
e
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
•
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
t
r
a
d
e
s
o
f
f
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
;
•
T
r
u
c
k
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
•
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Co
m
p
a
c
t
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
–
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
v
s
T
r
u
c
k
T
u
r
n
i
n
g
5
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
L
a
y
o
u
t
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
6
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
•
By
-
p
a
s
s
T
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
/
B
y
-
p
a
s
s
T
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
•
By
-
p
a
s
s
T
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
/
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
•
Ro
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
/
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
•
Co
m
p
a
c
t
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
/
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
•
De
s
i
g
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
i
f
e
2
0
Y
e
a
r
s
•
LO
S
D
(R
e
v
i
s
e
d
)
•
Va
i
l
’
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
•
Sa
f
e
t
y
(
V
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
,
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
,
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
)
•
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
•
Ac
c
e
s
s
(
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
)
•
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
(
N
o
i
s
e
,
L
i
g
h
t
,
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
,
e
t
c
…
)
•
Ae
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
•
Sc
a
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
(
F
u
t
u
r
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
)
•
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
s
t
,
R
O
W
,
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
12
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
13
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Su
m
m
a
r
y
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
14
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
Co
m
p
a
c
t
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
/
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
•
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
be
s
t
L
O
S
an
d
le
a
s
t
q
u
e
u
e
•
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
b
e
s
t
g
e
o
m
e
t
r
y
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
sa
f
e
s
t
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
to
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
,
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
•
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
m
o
s
t
f
l
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
•
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
le
a
s
t
am
o
u
n
t
o
f
ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
to
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
•
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
g
o
o
d
ae
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
5/6/2014
I-
7
0
V
a
i
l
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
To
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
f
o
r
2
0
1
7
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
:
•
Ma
y
6
th
:
En
d
o
r
s
e
a
n
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
•
Ma
y
-
J
u
l
y
:
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
G
e
o
m
e
t
r
i
c
&
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
•
Ju
n
e
-
J
u
l
y
:
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
(
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
/
A
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
)
•
Au
g
u
s
t
:
3D
R
e
n
d
e
r
i
n
g
•
Au
g
u
s
t
:
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
–
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
4
15
To
w
n
o
f
Va
i
l
|
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
|
5/
6
/
1
4
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
To: Town Council
From: Public Works Department
Date: 5-6-14
Subject: I-70 Vail Underpass Project Trip Generation and Distribution
At the April 1st Council session questions came up regarding the distribution of traffic for
existing and projected traffic volumes projected to travel thru the underpass. A seven
step process was followed to develop the 2040 total traffic volumes for use in the I-70
Vail Underpass traffic analyses. This process is outlined below and should be read in
conjunction with the attached figures.
A. Step 1 - Existing Peak Season 2012 Traffic Conditions
Existing conditions are set at year 2012 to coincide with recent traffic counts collected
by the Town of Vail. Traffic counts were collected at the study intersections during the
2012 Christmas holiday. AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions were collected on
Friday December 28, 2012, corresponding to the day with highest hotel room booking
rates throughout the Town. These peak period counts were used as a basis in
analyzing peak conditions at the study intersections. Existing 2012 traffic volumes are
summarized for the project intersections in Step 1.
B. Step 2 - Existing Peak Season Traffic with Underpass
The intersections of Lions Ridge Loop with North Frontage Road (#29) and Westhaven
Drive with South Frontage Road (#23) were identified as the closest count locations to
the proposed underpass. The highlighted traffic movements were tabulated to derive
the existing through traffic volumes along the North and South Frontage Roads at the
proposed underpass location. The existing PM traffic volumes for both the eastbound
and westbound directions combined are 583 vph at the North intersection (#48), and
986 vph at the South intersection (#40).
C. Step 3 - Existing Peak Season Diversion by Movement
As described in the VTMP, a large number of trips currently use the Main Vail and West
Vail roundabout interchanges to perform “u-turn” movements between various locations
on the North and South Frontage Roads. Five movements were identified where traffic
would be expected to divert from the roundabout interchanges to the proposed
underpass:
North Main Vail (#1) Eastbound right turns (30% diversion)
South Main Vail (#2) Eastbound left turns (30% diversion)
South Main Vail (#2) Westbound right turns (15% diversion)
North West Vail (#5) Westbound left turns (30% diversion)
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 2
South West Vail (#6) Westbound right turns (30% diversion)
The diversion percentages and resultant diversion volumes (of existing trips) are
highlighted for each of the five movements.
D. Step 4 - Existing Peak Season Diverted Trips
The diversion volumes identified for each of the five movements described in Step 3
were diverted from the roundabout interchanges to the proposed underpass
intersections. Each of the five movement diversions have been tracked on the figure.
Note that when trips are diverted, the trips are subtracted from the origin location (and
corresponding downstream intersections) and then added to the diversion location to
ensure that double counting does not occur.
A total of 156 PM trips are estimated to divert from the North Frontage Road, and travel
on the underpass to the South intersection (#40). A total of 403 PM trips are estimated
to divert from the South Frontage Road and travel on the underpass to the North
intersection (#48). The diverted volumes are depicted on the Southbound approach to
the South intersection (62+94 = 156) and the Northbound approach to the North
intersection (302 + 101 = 403).
E. Step 5 – 2040 Background Peak Season Traffic with Underpass – General
Growth
The underpass project is projected to be complete in 2018. Typically a planning horizon
of 20 years is used for traffic analyses; the horizon / design year is often adjusted (by
industry practice) to the nearest 5 year increment to correspond with state and federal
planning documents. As such, a 22 year planning horizon / design year (2040) has been
agreed upon by the Town of Vail and CDOT for this project.
Based upon historic growth rates and estimated growth along the I-70 mountain
corridor, an annual growth percentage of 0.25% was selected by the project design
team to apply to existing traffic volumes. The existing traffic volumes were counted in
2012; the annual growth percentage was applied over 28 years to the design year of
2040. A multiplier of 1.072 was calculated and has been applied to the existing traffic
volumes with the underpass.
The general growth volumes do not include any additional development traffic in Vail;
they essentially represent an increase in vehicles passing by/through Vail on I-70. In
total, the general growth volumes in the PM peak hour are 84 vph at the North
intersection (#48), and 98 vph at the South intersection (#40).
F. Step 6 – 2040 Development Traffic with Underpass – Development Growth
As discussed at the Vail Town Council meeting on April 1, 2014, development growth at
33 sites in Vail was estimated based upon rates and procedures established in the
VTMP. The Town of Vail engineering staff has been tracking development since the
VTMP was finalized; the development growth expected to occur between 2012 and
2040 was estimated. The estimated development growth was then distributed to the
town roadway network which includes the proposed underpass. Development growth
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 3
volumes (rounded to the nearest 5) in the PM peak hour are 435 vph at the North
intersection (#48), and 425 vph at the South intersection (#40).
G. Step 7 – 2040 Total Traffic with Underpass
The component traffic volumes identified (existing, diverted, general growth, and
development growth) were added together to determine the total traffic volumes at the
North and South Underpass intersections. The 2040 total traffic volumes in the PM peak
hour are 1505 vph at the North intersection (#48), and 1665 vph at the South
intersection (#40).
5/6/2014
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
-
S
t
e
p
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
e
a
k
S
e
a
s
o
n
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
DO
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
L
O
R
A
D
O
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
Va
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
E
L
,
1
3
-
1
6
4
,
4
/
2
9
/
1
4
1(
3
)
1(
3
)
11
(
2
)
0(0
)
26
2
(
2
3
8
)
7(1
1
)
5(1)28(40)1(6)399(161)
2(6)
238(832)
162(304)
17(6)
64(180)413(1103)172(251)51(69)5(12)
210(154)
92(63)
382(253)
6(38)
6(
1
0
)
62
(
1
9
0
)
33
(
1
0
1
)
15
0
(
2
2
3
)
62
(
7
5
)
18(
1
5
)
0(0
)
531
(
3
4
0
)
157
(
9
3
)
256
(
9
1
)
33(57)
74(186)
13(35)
64(84)
28
(
4
4
)
14
8
(
3
2
3
)
57(28
)
29(47
)
2
4
(
3
5
)
1
6
4
(
1
7
8
)
1
3
2
(
5
7
8
)
4
1
(
6
6
)
4
0
3
(
2
6
9
)
9
0
(
8
9
)
61(73
)
34(10
6
)
S.
F
ro
n
t
a
ge
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
nta
g
e
R
d
.
EB
O
n-
R
a
m
p
EB O
ff
-
Ra
m
p
Vail Rd.
Vail Rd.
Spr
a
d
d
le Creek Rd.
N.
F
r
o
nt
a
ge Rd
.
WB
O
n
-R
a
m
p
WB
O
f
f-R
a
m
p
Vail Rd.
Cham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
WB
On-
R
a
m
p
W
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
275
(
3
8
0
)
33(4
7
)
9(17
)
104
(
3
7
2
)
N.
F
ront
a
g
e
R
d
.
2
2
(
4
0
)
3
(
2
0
)
1
6
6
(
3
3
0
)
2
3
2
(
2
8
4
)
3
(
1
3
)
u
-
t
u
r
n
8
6
(
4
0
)
1
5
(
2
8
)
2
(
2
0
)
4
(
2
)
1
6
(
3
6
)
0(0)
0(25
)
0(37
)
0(33
)
0(1)
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
E
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
EB
On-
R
a
m
p
2
0
4
(
1
9
6
)
0
(
1
)
2
6
5
(
1
8
8
)
5
(
9
)
1
(
3
2
)
0(
1
)
30
(
4
2
)
22
(
3
2
)
32
(
2
0
)
1(
1
)
15(
9
)
6(6
)
12(
2
1
)
0(1)
74(
1
1
0
)
141
(
1
9
9
)
11(1
3
)
25(
6
9
)
1
9
(
4
0
)
1
7
3
(
6
0
2
)
1
5
(
3
8
)
7
(
1
2
)
2
(
0
)
0(
4
)
1(6
)
2(
2
5
)
3(
2
1
)
19(
3
7
)
N. Frontage Rd.
L i o n s R i d g e L o o p
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
W . H a v e n D r.
1 2
5
6
=
A
M
(
P
M
)
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
=
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
XX
X
(
X
X
X
)
LE
G
E
N
D
X
29
23
L
i
o
n
s
R
idge
Red Sandstone Road
S
o
u
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
West Gore Cree
k
D
r
i
v
e
WE
S
T
V
A
I
L
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
PO
S
T
OF
F
I
C
E
TI
M
B
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
CA
S
C
A
D
E
VI
L
L
A
G
E
FU
T
U
R
E
EV
E
R
V
A
I
L
&
MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
LI
O
N
S
H
E
A
D
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
V.
T
.
C
.
L.T
.
C
.
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
HO
S
P
I
T
A
L
VA
I
L
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
6
(M
a
i
n
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
3
(W
e
s
t
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
OV
E
R
P
A
S
S
70
70
5
6
1
2
29
23
5/6/2014
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
-
S
t
e
p
2
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
e
a
k
S
e
a
s
o
n
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
w
i
t
h
N
e
w
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
DO
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
L
O
R
A
D
O
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
Va
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
E
L
,
1
3
-
1
6
4
,
4
/
3
0
/
1
4
1(3)1(3)11(2)
0(
0
)
26
2
(
2
3
8
)
7(1
1
)
5(1)28(40)1(6)399(161)2(6)238(832)162(304)17(6)64(180)413(1103)172(251)51(69)5(12)
210(154)
92(63)382(253)6(38)
6(
1
0
)
62
(
1
9
0
)
33
(
1
0
1
)
15
0
(
2
2
3
)
62
(
7
5
)
18(
1
5
)
0(0
)
531
(
3
4
0
)
157
(
9
3
)
256
(
9
1
)
33(57)74(186)13(35)64(84)
28
(
4
4
)
14
8
(
3
2
3
)
N. Frontage Rd.
L i o n s R i d g e L o o p
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
W . H a v e n D r.
29
23
2
4
(
3
5
)
1
6
4
(
1
7
8
)
57(28
)
29(47
)
1
3
2
(
5
7
8
)
4
1
(
6
6
)
4
0
3
(
2
6
9
)
9
0
(
8
9
)
61(73
)
34(10
6
)
Spraddle Creek Rd.
N.
F
r
o
nt
a
ge Rd.
S.
F
ro
n
t
a
ge
R
d
.
S. Frontage Rd.
WB
O
n
-R
a
m
p
EB On-RampWB Off-Ramp
EB O
ff
-
Ra
m
p
Vail Rd.Vail Rd.Vail Rd.
Cham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
WB
On-
R
a
m
p
W
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
275
(
3
8
0
)
33(4
7
)
9(17
)
104
(
3
7
2
)
N.
F
ront
a
g
e
R
d
.
2
2
(
4
0
)
3
(
2
0
)
1
6
6
(
3
3
0
)
2
3
2
(
2
8
4
)
3
(
1
3
)
u
-
t
u
r
n
8
6
(
4
0
)
1
5
(
2
8
)
2
(
2
0
)
4
(
2
)
1
6
(
3
6
)
0(0)
0(25
)
0(37
)
0(33
)
0(1)
C ham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
E
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
EB
On-
R
a
m
p
2
0
4
(
1
9
6
)
0
(
1
)
2
6
5
(
1
8
8
)
5
(
9
)
1
(
3
2
)
0(
1
)
30
(
4
2
)
22
(
3
2
)
32
(
2
0
)
1(
1
)
15(
9
)
6(6
)
12(
2
1
)
0(1
)
74(
1
1
0
)
141
(
1
9
9
)
11(1
3
)
25(
6
9
)
1
9
(
4
0
)
1
7
3
(
6
0
2
)
1
5
(
3
8
)
7(
1
2
)
2
(
0
)
0(
4
)
1(6
)
2(
2
5
)
3(
2
1
)
19
(
3
7
)
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
Rd
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
1
7
7
(
3
7
0
)
1
8
8
(
2
1
3
)
1
7
3
(
6
4
4
)
4
6
4
(
3
4
2
)
1 2
5 6
40
48
=
A
M
(
P
M
)
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
=
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
XX
X
(
X
X
X
)
LE
G
E
N
D
X
37
0
+
2
1
3
=
5
8
3
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
M
64
4
+
3
4
2
=
9
8
6
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
M
L
i
o
n
s
R
idge
Red Sandstone Road
S
o
u
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
West Gore Cree
k
D
r
i
v
e
Simba
Run
WE
S
T
V
A
I
L
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
PO
S
T
OF
F
I
C
E
TI
M
B
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
CA
S
C
A
D
E
VI
L
L
A
G
E
FU
T
U
R
E
EV
E
R
V
A
I
L
&
MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
LI
O
N
S
H
E
A
D
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
V.
T
.
C
.
L.T
.C
.
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
HO
S
P
I
T
A
L
VA
I
L
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
6
(M
a
i
n
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
3
(W
e
s
t
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
OV
E
R
P
A
S
S
70
70
5
6
1
48
40
2
29
23
5/6/2014
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
-
S
t
e
p
3
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
e
a
k
S
e
a
s
o
n
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
b
y
M
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
DO
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
L
O
R
A
D
O
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
Va
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
E
L
,
1
3
-
1
6
4
,
4
/
2
9
/
1
4
1(3)1(3)11(2)5(1)28(40)1(6)399(161)2(6)238(832)162(304)17(6)
210(154)
92(63)382(253)6(38)
18(
1
5
)
0(0
)
531
(
3
4
0
)
157
(
9
3
)
256
(
9
1
)
33(57)74(186)13(35)64(84)
6(
1
0
)
62
(
1
9
0
)
33
(
1
0
1
)
15
0
(
2
2
3
)
62
(
7
5
)
64(180)413(1103)172(251)51(69)5(12)
0(
0
)
26
2
(
2
3
8
)
7(
1
1
)
Spraddle Creek Rd.
N.
F
r
o
nt
a
ge Rd.
S.
F
ro
n
t
a
ge
R
d
.
S. Frontage Rd.
WB
O
n
-R
a
m
p
EB On-RampWB Off-Ramp
EB O
ff
-
Ra
m
p
Vail Rd.Vail Rd.Vail Rd.
Cham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
WB
On-
R
a
m
p
W
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
275
(
3
8
0
)
33(4
7
)
9(17
)
104
(
3
7
2
)
N.
F
ront
a
g
e
R
d
.
8
6
(
4
0
)
1
5
(
2
8
)
2
(
2
0
)
4
(
2
)
1
6
(
3
6
)
0(0)
0(25
)
0(37
)
0(33
)
0(1)
C ham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
E
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
EB
On-
R
a
m
p
2
0
4
(
1
9
6
)
0
(
1
)
2
6
5
(
1
8
8
)
5
(
9
)
1
(
3
2
)
0(
1
)
30
(
4
2
)
22
(
3
2
)
32
(
2
0
)
1(
1
)
15(
9
)
6(6
)
12(
2
1
)
0(1
)
74(
1
1
0
)
141
(
1
9
9
)
11(1
3
)
25(
6
9
)
1
9
(
4
0
)
1
7
3
(
6
0
2
)
1
5
(
3
8
)
7(
1
2
)
2
(
0
)
0(
4
)
1(6
)
2(
2
5
)
3(
2
1
)
19
(
3
7
)
2
2
(
4
0
)
3
(
2
0
)
1
6
6
(
3
3
0
)
2
3
2
(
2
8
4
)
3
(
1
3
)
u
-
t
u
r
n
30
%
x
2
8
4
=
8
5
30
%
x
6
0
2
=
1
8
1
15%x1103=165
30
%
x
1
9
0
=
5
7
30
%
x
2
3
8
=
7
1
1 2
5 6
=
A
M
(
P
M
)
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
=
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
=
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
B
y
M
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
XX
X
(
X
X
X
)
LE
G
E
N
D
X %
L
i
o
n
s
R
idge
Red Sandstone Road
S
o
u
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
West Gore Cree
k
D
r
i
v
e
Simba
Run
WE
S
T
V
A
I
L
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
PO
S
T
OF
F
I
C
E
TI
M
B
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
CA
S
C
A
D
E
VI
L
L
A
G
E
FU
T
U
R
E
EV
E
R
V
A
I
L
&
MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
LI
O
N
S
H
E
A
D
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
V.
T
.
C
.
L.T
.C
.
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
HO
S
P
I
T
A
L
VA
I
L
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
6
(M
a
i
n
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
3
(W
e
s
t
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
OV
E
R
P
A
S
S
70
70
5
6
1
48
40
2
5/6/2014
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
-
S
t
e
p
4
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
e
a
k
S
e
a
s
o
n
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
D
i
v
e
r
t
e
d
T
r
i
p
s
DO
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
L
O
R
A
D
O
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
Va
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
E
L
,
1
3
-
1
6
4
,
4
/
2
9
/
1
4
1(3)1(3)11(2)5(1)28(40)1(6)399(161)
210(121)
92(53)382(215)6(38)
18(
1
5
)
0(0
)
531
(
3
4
0
)
157
(
9
3
)
256
(
9
1
)
33(57)74(186)13(35)64(84)
0(
0
)
18
3
(
1
6
7
)
7(
1
1
)
2(6)238(832)81(82)17(6)
6(
1
0
)
43
(
1
3
3
)
33
(
1
0
1
)
15
0
(
2
2
3
)
62
(
7
5
)
64(180)351(938)172(251)51(69)5(12)
Divert 181
Spraddle Creek Rd.
N.
F
r
o
nt
a
ge Rd.
S.
F
ro
n
t
a
ge
R
d
.
S. Frontage Rd.
WB
O
n
-R
a
m
p
EB On-RampWB Off-Ramp
EB O
ff
-
Ra
m
p
Vail Rd.Vail Rd.Vail Rd.
Cham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
WB
On-
R
a
m
p
W
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
275
(
2
2
5
)
33(2
8
)
9(10
)
104
(
3
7
2
)
N.
F
ront
a
g
e
R
d
.
8
6
(
4
0
)
1
5
(
2
8
)
2
(
2
0
)
4
(
2
)
1
6
(
3
6
)
0(0)
0(25
)
0(37
)
0(33
)
0(1)
C ham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
E
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
EB
On-
R
a
m
p
2
0
4
(
1
9
6
)
0
(
1
)
2
6
5
(
1
8
8
)
5
(
9
)
1
(
3
2
)
0(
1
)
30
(
4
2
)
22
(
3
2
)
32
(
2
0
)
1(
1
)
15(
9
)
6(6
)
12(
2
1
)
0(1
)
74(
8
0
)
141
(
1
4
4
)
11(1
3
)
25(
6
9
)
1
9
(
4
0
)
1
2
1
(
4
2
1
)
1
5
(
3
8
)
7(
1
2
)
2
(
0
)
33(101)
100(302)
60(62)
89(94)
5
2
(
1
8
1
)
4
1
2
(
1
6
1
)
0(
4
)
1(6
)
2(
2
5
)
3(
2
1
)
19
(
3
7
)
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
Rd
.
Simba R
u
n
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
Simba R
u
n
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
81
(
2
2
2
)
91
(
4
2
2
)
2
2
(
4
0
)
3
(
2
0
)
1
6
6
(
3
3
0
)
1
6
2
(
1
9
9
)
3
(
1
3
)
u
-
t
u
r
n
1
2
4
(
1
2
8
)
7
0
(
8
5
)
D i v e rt 85
Diver
t
7
1
9
8
(
2
9
9
)
7
9
(
7
1
)
304-165-57=82
28
4
-
8
5
=
1
9
9
23
8
-
7
1
=
1
6
7
18
1
+
2
2
2
=
4
0
3
D
i
v
e
r
t
e
d
P
M
85
+
7
1
=
1
5
6
D
i
v
e
r
t
e
d
P
M
1 2
5 6
40
48
=
A
M
(
P
M
)
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
=
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
XX
X
(
X
X
X
)
LE
G
E
N
D
X
16
5
+
5
7
=
2
2
2
D i v e r t 5 7
Divert 165
19
0
-
5
7
=
1
3
3
1103-165=938
60
2
-
1
8
1
=
4
2
1
L
i
o
n
s
R
idge
Red Sandstone Road
S
o
u
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
West Gore
C
r
e
e
k Drive
Simba
Run
WE
S
T
V
A
I
L
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
PO
S
T
OF
F
I
C
E
TI
M
B
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
CA
S
C
A
D
E
VI
L
L
A
G
E
FU
T
U
R
E
EV
E
R
V
A
I
L
&
MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
LI
O
N
S
H
E
A
D
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
V.
T
.
C
.
L.T
.C
.
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
HO
S
P
I
T
A
L
VA
I
L
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
6
(M
a
i
n
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
3
(W
e
s
t
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
OV
E
R
P
A
S
S
70
70
5
6
1
48
40
2-7
1
-5
7
-1
6
5
+7
1
+8
5
-8
5
-1
8
1
+
1
8
1
+1
6
5
+
5
7
=
+
2
2
2
5/6/2014
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
-
S
t
e
p
5
20
4
0
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
P
e
a
k
S
e
a
s
o
n
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
N
e
w
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
G
r
o
w
t
h
DO
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
L
O
R
A
D
O
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
Va
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
E
L
,
1
3
-
1
6
4
,
4
/
3
0
/
1
4
5(5)5(5)15(5)
0(
0
)
20
0
(
1
8
0
)
10
(
1
5
)
5(5)30(45)5(5)435(175)5(5)260(900)85(75)20(5)70(195)380(1005)185(270)55(75)5(15)
230(165)
100(70)415(275)5(40)
5(
1
0
)
45
(
1
4
0
)
35
(
1
1
0
)
16
5
(
2
4
0
)
70
(
8
0
)
20(
1
5
)
0(0
)
575
(
3
7
0
)
170
(
1
0
0
)
280
(
1
0
0
)
35(60)80(200)15(40)70(90)
S.
F
ro
n
t
a
ge
R
d
.
S. Frontage Rd.EB On-Ramp
EB O
ff-
Ra
m
p
Vail Rd.Vail Rd.Spraddle Creek Rd.
N.
F
r
o
nt
a
ge Rd.
WB
O
n
-R
a
m
p
WB Off-Ramp Vail Rd.
Cham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
WB
On-
R
a
m
p
W
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
240
(
2
1
5
)
35(5
0
)
10(2
0
)
115
(
4
0
5
)
N.
F
ront
a
g
e
R
d
.
2
5
(
4
5
)
5
(
2
0
)
1
8
0
(
3
6
0
)
1
7
5
(
2
1
5
)
5
(
1
5
)
u
-
t
u
r
n
9
5
(
4
5
)
1
5
(
3
0
)
5
(
2
0
)
5
(
5
)
2
0
(
4
0
)
0(0)
0(25
)
0(40
)
0(35
)
0(0)
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
E
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
EB
On-
R
a
m
p
2
2
0
(
2
1
5
)
0
(
0
)
2
8
5
(
2
0
5
)
5
(
1
0
)
0
(
3
5
)
0(
0
)
35
(
4
5
)
25
(
3
5
)
35
(
2
0
)
5(
5
)
15(
1
0
)
5(5
)
15(
2
5
)
0(0
)
80(
1
2
0
)
80(
1
2
0
)
15(
1
5
)
25(
7
5
)
2
0
(
4
5
)
1
3
0
(
4
5
5
)
1
5
(
4
0
)
1
0
(
1
5
)
5
(
0
)
40(110)
110(325)
60(70)
100(105)
1
0
5
(
3
2
0
)
8
5
(
8
0
)
0(
5
)
5(
5
)
5(
2
5
)
5(
2
5
)
20
(
4
0
)
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
Rd
.
Simba R
u
n
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
Simba R
u
n
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
1
3
5
(
1
4
0
)
7
5
(
9
5
)
90
(
2
4
0
)
10
0
(
4
5
5
)
6
0
(
1
9
5
)
4
4
0
(
1
7
5
)
84
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
G
r
o
w
t
h
P
M
98
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
G
r
o
w
t
h
P
M
0.
2
5
%
A
n
n
u
a
l
G
r
o
w
t
h
n-
2
0
4
0
-
2
0
1
2
=
>
n
=
2
8
Eq
u
a
t
i
o
n
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
u
n
i
v
e
r
s
a
l
l
y
:
V
FU
T
=V
EX
x
(
1
+
0
.
0
0
2
5
)
28=1.072
Al
l
v
o
l
u
m
e
s
r
o
u
n
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
n
e
a
r
e
s
t
5
Ex
a
m
p
l
e
18
1
x
(
0
.
0
7
2
)
=
1
3
13
+
1
8
1
=
1
9
4
(1
9
4
r
o
u
n
d
e
d
t
o
ne
a
r
e
s
t
5
=
1
9
5
)
1 2
5 6
4048
=
A
M
(
P
M
)
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
=
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
XX
X
(
X
X
X
)
LE
G
E
N
D
X
NO
T
E
S
:
L
i
o
n
s
R
idge
Red Sandstone Road
S
o
u
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
West Gore Cree
k
D
r
i
v
e
Simba
Run
WE
S
T
V
A
I
L
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
PO
S
T
OF
F
I
C
E
TI
M
B
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
CA
S
C
A
D
E
VI
L
L
A
G
E
FU
T
U
R
E
EV
E
R
V
A
I
L
&
MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
LI
O
N
S
H
E
A
D
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
V.
T
.
C
.
L.T
.C
.
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
HO
S
P
I
T
A
L
VA
I
L
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
6
(M
a
i
n
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
3
(W
e
s
t
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
OV
E
R
P
A
S
S
70
70
5
6
1
48
40
2
5/6/2014
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
-
S
t
e
p
6
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
w
i
t
h
N
e
w
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
-
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
w
t
h
DO
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
L
O
R
A
D
O
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
Va
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
E
L
,
1
3
-
1
6
4
,
4
/
3
0
/
1
4
0(0)0(0)0(0)
0(
0
)
11
4
(
1
3
6
)
0(
0
)
0(0)45(86)0(0)131(240)0(0)200(246)33(55)0(0)79(96)91(119)51(94)16(12)0(0)
54(115)
51(54)70(122)70(85)
0(
0
)
77
(
1
0
6
)
68
(
8
5
)
66
(
8
6
)
6(
6
)
0(0
)
0(0
)
57
(
9
7
)
42
(
4
4
)
43
(
9
2
)
8(8)65(75)56(60)13(18)Spraddle Creek Rd.
N.
F
r
o
nt
a
ge Rd.
S.
F
ro
n
t
a
ge
R
d
.
S. Frontage Rd.
WB
O
n
-R
a
m
p
EB On-RampWB Off-Ramp
EB O
ff-
Ra
m
p
Vail Rd.Vail Rd.Vail Rd.
Cham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
WB On-
R
a
m
p
W
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
44(
1
0
3
)
29(
4
7
)
0(0
)
90(
1
1
6
)
N.
F
ront
a
g
e
R
d
.
2
8
(
3
3
)
0
(
0
)
7
7
(
7
3
)
8
2
(
9
3
)
0
(
0
)
u
-
t
u
r
n
4
3
(
8
8
)
2
7
(
3
9
)
0
(
0
)
0
(
0
)
0
(
0
)
0(0)
24(3
4
)
37(4
6
)
34(3
7
)
0(0)
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
E
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
EB
On-
R
a
m
p
5
5
(
1
2
3
)
0
(
0
)
6
4
(
1
2
3
)
0
(
0
)
0
(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(0
)
0(0
)
0(0
)
0(0
)
99(
1
1
3
)
19(
2
7
)
0(0
)
0(0
)
0
(
0
)
1
0
8
(
1
4
3
)
0
(
0
)
0
(
0
)
0
(
0
)
0(0)
49(86)
59(82)
0(1)
7
0
(
1
3
4
)
0
(
0
)
2
(
1
)
7
3
(
1
2
3
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
0(
0
)
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
Simba R
u
n
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
Simba R
u
n
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
1
1
0
(
1
2
9
)
5
9
(
8
3
)
48
(
8
5
)
77
(
1
2
9
)
EB
t
o
N
B
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
s
l
o
w
a
s
m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
r
e
a
s
s
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
w
a
s
We
s
t
V
a
i
l
t
o
L
i
o
n
s
h
e
a
d
a
n
d
V
a
i
l
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
To
t
a
l
s
r
o
u
n
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
n
e
a
r
e
s
t
5
NO
T
E
S
:
1 2
5 6
4048
=
A
M
(
P
M
)
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
=
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
XX
X
(
X
X
X
)
LE
G
E
N
D
X
43
5
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
w
t
h
P
M
42
5
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
w
t
h
P
M
L
i
o
n
s
R
idge
Red Sandstone Road
S
o
u
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
West Gore Cree
k
D
r
i
v
e
Simba
Run
WE
S
T
V
A
I
L
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
PO
S
T
OF
F
I
C
E
TI
M
B
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
CA
S
C
A
D
E
VI
L
L
A
G
E
FU
T
U
R
E
EV
E
R
V
A
I
L
&
MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
LI
O
N
S
H
E
A
D
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
V.
T
.
C
.
L.T
.C
.
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
HO
S
P
I
T
A
L
VA
I
L
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
6
(M
a
i
n
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
3
(W
e
s
t
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
OV
E
R
P
A
S
S
70
70
5
6
1
48
40
2
5/6/2014
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
-
S
t
e
p
7
20
4
0
T
o
t
a
l
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
w
i
t
h
N
e
w
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
DO
T
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
L
O
R
A
D
O
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
Va
i
l
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
P
E
L
,
1
3
-
1
6
4
,
4
/
3
0
/
1
4
5(5)5(5)15(5)
0(
0
)
31
4
(
3
1
5
)
10
(
1
5
)
5(5)75(130)5(5)566(415)5(5)460(1145)118(130)20(5)149(290)471(1125)236(365)71(90)5(15)
284(280
)
151(125)485(400)75(125)
5(
1
0
)
12
2
(
2
4
5
)
10
3
(
1
9
5
)
23
1
(
3
2
5
)
76
(
8
5
)
20(
1
5
)
0(0
)
632
(
4
7
0
)
212
(
1
4
5
)
323
(
1
9
5
)
43(70)145(275)71(100)83(110)Spraddle Creek Rd.
N.
F
r
o
nt
a
ge Rd.
WB
O
n
-
R
a
m
p
WB Off-Ramp Vail Rd.
S.
F
ro
n
t
a
ge
R
d
.
S. Frontage Rd.EB On-Ramp
EB O
ff-
Ra
m
p
Vail Rd.Vail Rd.
Cham
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
WB On-R
a
m
p
W
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
284
(
3
2
0
)
64(
1
0
0
)
10(
2
0
)
205
(
5
2
0
)
N.
F
ront
a
g
e
R
d
.
5
3
(
8
0
)
5
(
2
0
)
2
5
7
(
4
3
5
)
2
5
7
(
3
1
0
)
5
(
1
5
)
u
-
t
u
r
n
1
3
8
(
1
3
5
)
4
2
(
7
0
)
5
(
2
0
)
5
(
5
)
2
0
(
4
0
)
0(0)
24(6
0
)
37(8
5
)
34(7
5
)
0(0)
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
Cha
m
o
n
i
x
R
d
.
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
E
B
O
f
f
-
R
a
m
p
EB
On-
R
a
m
p
2
7
5
(
3
4
0
)
0
(
0
)
3
4
9
(
3
2
5
)
5
(
1
0
)
0
(
3
5
)
0(
0
)
3
5
(
4
5
)
2
5
(
3
5
)
35
(
2
0
)
5(
5
)
15(
1
0
)
5(5
)
15(
2
5
)
0(0
)
179
(
3
3
5
)
99(
1
5
0
)
15(
1
5
)
25(
7
5
)
2
0
(
4
5
)
2
3
8
(
6
0
0
)
1
0
(
4
0
)
5
(
1
5
)
0
(
0
)
40(110)
160(410)
120(155)
100(105)
1
7
5
(
4
5
5
)
8
5
(
8
0
)
6
5
(
1
9
5
)
5
1
5
(
3
0
0
)
0(
5
)
5(
5
)
5(
2
5
)
5(
2
5
)
20
(
4
0
)
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
Simba R
u
n
N
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
Simba R
u
n
S
.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
2
4
5
(
2
7
0
)
1
3
5
(
1
8
0
)
14
0
(
3
2
5
)
18
0
(
5
8
5
)
15
0
5
T
o
t
a
l
P
M
16
6
5
T
o
t
a
l
P
M
1 2
5 6
4048
=
A
M
(
P
M
)
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
V
o
l
u
m
e
s
=
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
XX
X
(
X
X
X
)
LE
G
E
N
D
X
L
i
o
n
s
R
idge
Red Sandstone Road
S
o
u
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
N
o
r
t
h
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
West Gore Cree
k
D
r
i
v
e
Simba
Run
WE
S
T
V
A
I
L
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
CE
N
T
E
R
PO
S
T
OF
F
I
C
E
TI
M
B
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
CA
S
C
A
D
E
VI
L
L
A
G
E
FU
T
U
R
E
EV
E
R
V
A
I
L
&
MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
LI
O
N
S
H
E
A
D
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
V.
T
.
C
.
L.T
.C
.
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
/
HO
S
P
I
T
A
L
VA
I
L
VI
L
L
A
G
E
VA
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
6
(M
a
i
n
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
Va
i
l
E
x
i
t
No
.
1
7
3
(W
e
s
t
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
)
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
OV
E
R
P
A
S
S
70
70
5
6
1
48
40
2
5/6/2014
c(
7
0
)
/
c
(
1
2
0
)
b(
3
5
)
/
b
(
5
0
)
b(
2
5
)
/
b
(
2
5
)
fr
e
e
C/
E
b(40)/c(55)
b(25)/b(25)
b(
4
5
)
/
b
(
6
0
)
fr
e
e
D/
E
20
4
0
P
M
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
1-Lane Roundabout w/Auxiliary Lanes North and South Compact Roundabout North Side
1-
L
a
n
e
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
/
A
u
x
i
l
i
a
r
y
L
a
n
e
s
S
o
u
t
h
S
i
d
e
N.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
S.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
Simba Run Simba Run
N.
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
.
N. Frontage Rd.S. Frontage Rd.Simba Run N. Frontage Rd.S. Frontage Rd.Simba Run
X/
X
=
I
d
e
a
l
/
S
n
o
w
M
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Le
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
(
9
5
%
Qu
e
u
e
s
i
n
F
e
e
t
)
=
I
d
e
a
l
/
S
n
o
w
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Le
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
=
S
t
o
p
S
i
g
n
=
L
a
n
e
A
s
s
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
LE
G
E
N
D
x(
x
x
)
/
x
(
x
x
)
b(
6
5
)
/
c
(
1
1
0
)
f(
3
7
5
)
/
f
(
3
7
5
)
a(25)/b(25)
d(190)/f(345)
c(
7
0
)
/
c
(
1
2
0
)
b(
3
5
)
/
b
(
5
0
)
fr
e
e
C/
E
b(
2
5
)
/
b
(
2
5
)
a(
6
5
)
/
b
(
9
0
)
a(25)/a(25)b(65)/b(110)c(160)/f(430)B/D a(45)/a(60)b(125)/c(250)b(50)/c(80)
b(
8
0
)
/
b
(
1
3
0
)
B/B
a(
6
5
)
/
b
(
9
0
)
a(25)/a(25)b(65)/b(110)c(160)/f(430)B/D a(45)/a(60)b(125)/c(250)b(50)/c(80)
b(
8
0
)
/
b
(
1
3
0
)
B/B
a(25)/b(25)
d(190)/f(345)
FELSBURG HOLT&ULLEVIG
By
p
a
s
s
-
T
a(
4
5
)
/
a
(
6
0
)
b(
1
2
5
)
/
c
(
2
5
0
)
b(50)/c(80)
b(
8
0
)
/
b
(
1
3
0
)
B/
B
By
p
a
s
s
T
N
o
r
t
h
S
i
d
e
,
1-
L
a
n
e
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
/
A
u
x
i
l
i
a
r
y
L
a
n
e
s
S
o
u
t
h
S
i
d
e
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: The purpose of this item is to present Phase II of the Town of Vail’s Facility
Wide Energy Conservation Project through use of LED lighting technology, supported by Holy
Cross Energy’s Think BIG Grant.
PRESENTER(S): Greg Hall
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide direction to staff regarding moving forward
with final project implementation.
BACKGROUND: Phase II Energy Project is a continuing effort by the Town of Vail to meet
the adopted goal of 20% energy savings by 2020. The project is funded in part through grants
and rebates from Holy Cross Energy. See memo for specifics of the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Vail Town Council direct staff to
proceed to finalize the neighborhood streetlight design and enter into a contract for Phase II of
the Facility -Wide Energy Conservation Project up to $ 543,868, and to supplement the budget
up to $156,981 additional dollars from the capital projects fund balance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Facility Wide Endergy Memorandum
5/6/2014
To: Vail Town Council
From: Community Development and Public Works Departments
Date: May 6, 2014
Subject: Holy Cross Energy Grant – Phase II Facility-Wide Energy Conservation Project
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to present Phase II of the Town of Vail’s Facility
Wide Energy Conservation Project through use of LED lighting technology, supported
by Holy Cross Energy’s Think BIG Grant.
II. BACKGROUND
In a continuing effort to meet the Town of Vail’s adopted sustainability goal of reducing
the town’s 2006 baseline energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by 20%
by 2020, staff evaluated an upgrade of remaining lights which were not part of the
town’s Phase I project, primarily outside lighting. The Phase I project resulted in a
reduction of 1,792,320 kilowatt hours (kWh) and an annual savings of $159,283.
The town applied for and received Holy Cross Energy’s Think BIG Grant last December.
Grant requirements included a minimum savings of 500,000 kilowatt hours per year and
project completion by December 31, 2014. The town contacted Illuminex, a LED bulb
supplier and retrofit specialty company to assist with the town’s application. They were
most recently contracted by the Town of Breckenridge in converting their street lights to
LED.
III. PROJECT
The conversion of the town street lights alone did not meet the savings requirements of
the Think BIG grant. In order to meet the requirements Illuminex recommended
upgrading current fluorescent facility lighting in addition to street lighting to LED
technology. In 2011 LED retrofit technology did not exist, but rather it was necessary to
replace old fluorescent lamps with a new fluorescent lamp and ballast, or it was
necessary to replace old fixtures with new LED fixtures as was done in both parking
structures. However since then, LED retrofit technology has evolved in two areas. The
dependability and wide array of products available in the market have increased, and the
cost of LED retrofit bulbs has halved in the last two years.
Grant Update
Since the grant award, a more detailed analysis has been performed and several
changes have been made: 5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 2
• The original grant proposal included the Dobson Ice arena. However,
because the town does not pay the utility bill at Dobson this portion of the
project was eliminated and the grant was adjusted. The current Think BIG
grant amount is $147,627.
• A detailed total inventory of street lights was conducted along with employee
housing projects, adding several hundred bulbs to the project.
• Because some of the street lights are not metered and the town pays a flat
rate, The Think BIG Grant does not apply, but Holy Cross Energy does have
a smaller rebate program which may be applied to non-metered lighting.
• Additional lighting at the employee housing projects also qualifies for a Holy
Cross rebate using their residential formula.
• The total value of grants and rebates available for this project is now
$165,663-$169,605 depending on the final neighborhood streetlight
design.
Energy Savings
With the assistance of Illuminex, the town initially identified an energy savings potential
of up to 882,093 kWh per year as a proposed Phase II lighting project upgrade. The
detailed analysis which included adjusting usage rates and adding additional street
lights and employee housing now shows an energy savings potential of between
936,933-964,468 kWh depending on the final neighborhood light fixture design. This
includes over 7,300 bulbs to be replaced.
A savings of 964,468 kWh equals an additional 6.16 % reduction in the town’s overall
energy use. The combined savings of Phases I and II will be 18.46% of the 20% goal.
This original estimated energy cost savings for this project per year was calculated at
$66,157. The revised energy cost savings is $73,309-$71,653.
Environmental Factors
Savings of 964,468 kWh per year is equal to a reduction of 705 tons of greenhouse gas
emissions, which equals:
• 213 cars removed from the roads
• 65,092 gallons of gas saved
• The equivalent of planting 775 trees.
Capital Cost
The initial project cost without Dobson was estimated at $ 433,211. The revised project
capital cost has been narrowed down to two final options for the design of the
neighborhood streetlights with an investment range of $519,147-$543,868.
Maintenance Savings
This original maintenance savings per year was estimated at $56,728. This included
annual product savings as well a labor savings due to the longer bulb life. The revised
estimate includes a total maintenance savings of $50,602 of which $19,638 is material
and $30,964 is labor.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 3
Simple Payback and Return on Investment Phase II Project (Original and Revised)
Simple Payback – Original and Revised Phase II Project
Cost Annual Savings Payback
Original project simple payback
$433,211
$66,157 (energy only) 6.54 yrs
Original project payback w/ grant
$285,584
$66,157 (energy only)
4.32 yrs
Revised project simple payback
$519,157
$92,947 (energy + materials)
($73,309+$19,638)
5.61 yrs
Revised project payback w/ grant
$360,072
$92,947 (energy + materials)
($73,309+$19,638)
3.80 yrs
Return on Investment – Revised Phase II Project
Return on Investment w/ grant $92,947 / $360,072
25.81%
Return on Investment with w/ grant, labor and material savings included
$73,309+$50,602 / $360,072
34.41%
Internal Return on Investment over the 9.6 year project life 24.67%
IV. PROJECT FUNDING
Costs
Material for 7,300 bulb replacements $ 353,058
Labor to install and remove the ballasts from the current fixtures $ 124,088
Total estimated cost $ 519,157-543,868
Funding Source
Energy Conservation project funds $ 221,224
Holy Cross Think BIG Grant and rebate funds $ 165,663-169,605
Additional capital funds required to complete the entire retrofit $ 128,328-156,981
Total Capital funds required $ 519,157-543,868
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Vail Town Council direct staff to proceed to finalize the
neighborhood streetlight design and enter into a contract for Phase II of the Facility -
Wide Energy Conservation Project up to $ 543,868, and to supplement the budget up to
$156,981 additional dollars from the capital projects fund balance.
VI. NEXT STEPS
Phase II timeline
Town Council review of detailed Phase II project May 2014
Construction/installation award May 2014
Installation period June-September 2014
Measurement/ Verification and reimbursement October-November 2014
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: First reading of Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, an ordinance repealing and
reenacting the approved development plan for Phase III of Special Development District No. 6,
Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to
allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling
units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn, Phase III) /Lot O, Block
5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130046)
PRESENTER(S): Jonathan Spence
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with
modifications, or deny Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, upon first reading.
BACKGROUND: On March 24, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed
the proposal to add approximately 792 square feet of GRFA to Units 501 and 502 of Vail
Village Inn, Phase III. The Commission offered comments on the proposal with regard to the
need to evaluate the proposal pursuant to the criteria, the new roof elements and the need to
tie the south roof element to the balcony below. The Commission, at the applicant’s request,
tabled the item to April 14, 2014. On April 14, 2014, the Planning and Environmental
Commission held a public hearing on the request for a recommendation on a major
amendment to add GRFA to Units 501 and 502. The Commission forwarded a recommend of
approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to SDD No.6, Vail
Village Inn, to increase the allowable GRFA for Phase III, with a vote of 7-0-0. This
recommendation was based upon the review of the criteria outlined in the April 14, 2014
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the evidence and
testimony presented.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends
the Vail Town Council approves Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, upon first reading.
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Memo with Att. PEC130046
5/6/2014
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: May 6, 2014
SUBJECT: First reading of Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, an ordinance repealing and
reenacting the approved development plan for Phase III of Special Development
District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment
Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor
area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow
Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn, Phase III) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing
1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130046)
Applicant: Deltec Bank and Trust, represented by Eggers Architect
Planner: Jonathan Spence
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Deltec Bank and Trust, represented by Eggers Architect, is requesting a
first reading of Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, an ordinance repealing and
reenacting the approved development plan for Phase III of Special Development District
No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail
Town Code to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions
to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village
Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard
thereto. (PEC130046)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
The Vail Town Council shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny Ordinance
No. 11, Series of 2014, upon first reading.
III. BACKGROUND
On March 24, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the
proposal to add approximately 792 square feet of GRFA to Units 501 and 502 of Vail
Village Inn, Phase III. The Commission offered comments on the proposal with regard
to the need to evaluate the proposal pursuant to the criteria, the new roof elements and
the need to tie the south roof element to the balcony below. The Commission, at the
applicant’s request, tabled the item to April 14, 2014.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 2
On April 14, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing
on the request for a recommendation on a major amendment to add GRFA to Units 501
and 502. The Commission forwarded a recommend of approval, with conditions, to the
Vail Town Council for a major amendment to SDD No.6, Vail Village Inn, to increase the
allowable GRFA for Phase III, with a vote of 7-0-0.
This recommendation was based upon the review of the criteria outlined in the April 14,
2014 memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the evidence
and testimony presented.
The Vail Town Code provides different review criteria, process and expectations
depending on the scope of the proposed project. Because the proposed additions to
each unit exceed 250 square feet (Unit 501 exceeds 250 square feet by 27 square feet,
Unit 502 by 265 square feet), this project is required to be processed as a Major
Amendment to a Special Development District and demonstrate compliance with the
following standard:
Public Benefit: The proposed deviations provide benefits to the town must
outweigh the adverse effects of such deviations.
As outlined in Section VII of the attached April 14, 2014 Planning and Environmental
Commission Staff Report, staff believes that the scope of the project, particularly its
proposed increase in square footage, does not necessitate considerable benefit as the
adverse effects of the proposed deviations are negligible. Staff considers that the
benefit proposed, including upgraded roofing materials over the majority of the structure
and replacement of outdated street lights to be commensurate with the deviations
requested. It is important to note that if this project were to reduce the proposed
additions to less than 250 square feet per unit, no demonstration of benefit would be
required.
IV. DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS
Should Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 be approved, the development statistics in
Phase III will change as follows:
Development Standard Approved/ Existing Proposed Change
Gross Residential
Floor Area (GRFA)
Unit 501
Unit 502
Total Phase III
SDD #6
2,467 sq. ft.
1,399 sq. ft.
46,067 sq. ft.
2,744 sq. ft.
1,914 sq. ft.
46,859 sq. ft.
+277 sq. ft.
+515 sq. ft.
+792 sq. ft. (1.7%↑)
Parking 108 spaces
1.4 spaces per unit
108 spaces
1.4 spaces per unit
No change
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 3
Dwelling Units (DUs) 11 Dwelling Units 11 Dwelling Units No change
Height 5 stories (74.3’ per
SDD)
5 stories (74.3’ per
SDD)
No change (new roof
elements @ 67.6’)
Site Coverage 55% (per SDD) 38% No change
Landscaping 30% (per SDD) 57% No change
V. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014,
upon first reading, the Community Development Department recommends the Council
passes the following motion:
“The Vail Town Council approves Ordinance No. 11, Series Of 2014, an
ordinance repealing and reenacting the approved development plan for
Phase III of Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant
to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow
for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to
existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502
(Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.”
Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, the
Community Development Department recommends the Council applies the following
condition:
1. This SDD major amendment approval is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review
application, including compliance with Sec. 14-10-5 Building Materials
and Design, Vail Town Code
2. The applicant shall mitigate the employee generation impact created by
the addition of 792 square feet of GRFA in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The
applicant shall make the required fee in lieu payment to the Town of
Vail prior to the issuance of any building permit.
3. The applicant shall receive and submit in conjunction with the building
permit, all applicable Colorado Department of Transportation approvals
for all impacts to the South Frontage Road East, including construction
staging, if necessary.
4. The applicant shall amend the recorded condominium map to reflect the
increase in floor area and space designation, prior to requesting any
certificate of occupancy inspection.
5. The applicant shall replace the three (3) existing street lights located
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 4
along the Frontage Road with Town of Vail street lights per Public
Work’s specification. The location of the streetlights is depicted in the
Streetlight Exhibit, included as Attachment C to the May 6, 2014
PEC130046 Town Council Memo. The number of new fixtures shall be
determined by the Director of Public Works and will not exceed three.
The new street lights shall be installed prior to requesting any
certificate of occupancy inspection.
Should the Vail Town Council choose to approve Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014, the
Community Development Department recommends the Council makes the following
findings:
“Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in the April 14, 2014
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the
evidence and testimony presented, the Vail Town Council finds:
1. That the special development district amendment complies with the
standards listed Article 12-9A, Special Development District, or that a
practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved.
2. That the special development district amendment is consistent with the
adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail
comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives
of the town; and
3. That the special development district amendment is compatible with
and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding
areas; and
4. That the special development district amendment promotes the health,
safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the
coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that
conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established
character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality.”
VI. ATTACHMENTS
A. Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014
B. PEC memorandum dated April 14, 2014
C. Streetlight Exhibit
5/6/2014
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 1
ORDINANCE NO. 11
Series of 2014
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 22, SERIES
2008, WHICH ADOPTED THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PHASE III
OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 6, VAIL VILLAGE INN, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 12-9A-10, AMENDMENT PROCEDURES, VAIL TOWN CODE, TO ALLOW
FOR AN INCREASE IN GROSS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA TO FACILITAT E
ADDITIONS TO EXISTING DWELLING UNITS, LOCATED AT 100 EAST ME ADOW
UNITS 501 AND 502 (VAIL VILLAGE INN, PHASE III) /LOT O, BLOCK 5D, VAIL
VILLAGE FILING 1, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail, in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado (the
"Town"), is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Colorado and the Vail Town Charter; and
WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the "Council") have
been duly elected and qualified; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2008, amended the approved
development plan for Phase III of Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn;
and
WHEREAS, amendments to a Special Development District are permitted
pursuant to the parameters set forth for such in Section 12-9A-10, Vail Town Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail
held a public hearing on April 14, 2014 to consider the proposed amendment in
accordance with the provisions of the Vail Town Code and forwarded a
recommendation of approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council by a vote of 7-0-
0; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the proposed amendment to
Special Development District No. 6, complies with the review criteria outlined in Section
12-9A-8, Vail Town Code, and that the applicant has demonstrated that any adverse
effects of the requested deviations from the development standards of the underlying
zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided; and
WHERAS, the Town Council finds that the special development district
amendment does comply with the standards listed Article 12-9A, Special Development
District, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been
achieved; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the special development district
amendment is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the
5/6/2014
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 2
Vail comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives of the town;
and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the special development district
amendment is compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the
surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that the special development district
amendment does promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the town
and promotes the coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner
that conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established character as a
resort and residential community of the highest quality; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council finds that temporary approval of this
amendment will have no negative effect on parking since the existing penthouse
dwelling unit can not yet be occupied; and
WHEREAS, the approval of this special development district amendment, and
the development standards in regard thereto, shall not establish precedence or
entitlements elsewhere within the Town of Vail.
WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code have
been sent to the appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the best interest of the public
health, safety, and welfare to amend the development plan for Phase III of Special
Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Purpose of the Ordinance
The purpose of this ordinance is to repeal and reenact Ordinance No 22, Series of 2008
to amend the approved development plan for Phase III of Special Development District
No. 6 to increase the allowable gross residential floor area (GRFA). This amendment
increases the allowable GRFA in Phase III from 46,067 square feet to 46,859 square feet,
an increase of 792 square feet.
Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2008, is hereby amended as follows (all additions are
illustrated with bold italics, deletions are illustrated with strikethrough, and text not
affected has been omitted):
5/6/2014
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 3
Section 2. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled, Planning Commission Report
The approval procedures described in Article 12-9A of the Vail Municipal Code have been
fulfilled, and the Vail Town Council has received the recommendation of the Planning and
Environmental Commission for a major amendment to the Approved Development Plan
for Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn Phase III.
Section 3. Special Development District No. 6
The Special Development District and the major amendment to the Approved
Development Plan for Phase III are established to assure comprehensive development
and use of the area in a manner that would be harmonious with the general character of
the Town, provide adequate open space and recreational amenities, and promote the
goals, objectives and policies of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Special Development
District No. 6 is regarded as being complementary to the Town of Vail by the Vail Town
Council and the Planning and Environmental Commission, and has been established
since there are significant aspects of the Special Development District that cannot be
satisfied through the imposition of standard Public Accommodation zone district
requirements.
Section 4. Development Standards – Special Development District No. 6, Vail
Village Inn, Phase III
The amended development plan for Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village
Inn, Phase III, shall include the following plans and materials prepared by Eggers
Architects, Inc., dated April 4, 2014 and stamped approved by the Town of Vail,
dated April 30, 2014 (as may be further amended by the Town of Vail Design
Review Board):
A. A1.3 Roof Plan, Proposed
B. A2.1 South Elevation, Proposed
C. A2.2 East Elevation, Proposed
D. A2.3 North Elevation, Proposed
E. A2.4 West Elevation, Proposed
The amended Development Plan for Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village
Inn, Phase III, shall include the following plans and materials prepared by Blue Line
Architects, dated September 24, 2008:
A. A1.3 Parking Map
B. A2.1 Level 95.0 Existing
C. A2.2 Level 95.0 Proposed
D. A2.3 Level 105.0 Existing
E. A2.4 Level 105.0 Proposed
F. A2.5 Level 114.4 Existing
5/6/2014
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 4
G. A3.1 Exterior Elevations
H. A3.2 Exterior Elevations
I. A5.1 Vicinity Map
Section 5. Condition of Approval for Special Development District No. 6, Phase
III.
Conditions applied by the Planning and Environmental Commission in
conjunction with the April 14, 2014 recommendation of approval with conditions:
1. This SDD major amendment approval is contingent upon the
applicant obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated
design review application, including compliance with Sec. 14-10-5
Building Materials and Design, Vail Town Code
2. The applicant shall mitigate the employee generation impact
created by the addition of 792 square feet of GRFA in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail
Town Code. The applicant shall make the required fee in lieu
payment to the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of any building
permit.
3. The applicant shall receive and submit in conjunction with the
building permit, all applicable Colorado Department of
Transportation approvals for all impacts to the South Frontage
Road East, including construction staging, if necessary.
4. The applicant shall amend the recorded condominium map to
reflect the increase in floor area and space designation, prior to
requesting any certificate of occupancy inspection.
5. The applicant shall replace the three (3) existing street lights located
along the Frontage Road with Town of Vail street lights per Public
Work’s specification. The location of the streetlights is depicted in
the Streetlight Exhibit, included as Attachment C to the May 6, 2014
PEC130046 Town Council Memo. The number of new fixtures shall
be determined by the Director of Public Works and will not exceed
three. The new street lights shall be installed prior to requesting any
certificate of occupancy inspection.
Section 6. Applicability
The changes contained in this ordinance shall only apply to the approved development
plan for Phase III of Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. Those
changes were contained within the documents associated with the Planning and
5/6/2014
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 5
Environmental Commission Major SDD Amendment, PEC13-0046. No other provisions
or requirements of the governing ordinance for any other phase of Special
Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, are amended, altered, or eliminated by this
ordinance.
Section 7.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining
portions of this ordinance; and the Vail Town Council hereby declares it would have
passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase
thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections,
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Section 8.
The amendment of any provision of the Town Code of Vail as provided in this ordinance
shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that
occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other
action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The
amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance
previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 9.
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith
are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be
construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof,
theretofore repealed.
Section 10.
The Vail Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof. The Council’s finding, determination and declaration is based upon
the review of the criteria prescribed by the Town Code of Vail and the evidence and
testimony presented in consideration of this ordinance.
5/6/2014
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2014 6
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of May, 2014 and a
public hearing for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 20th day of May, 2014, at
6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
_______________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDER PUBLISHED in
full this 20th day of May, 2014.
_______________________
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
5/6/2014
To: Planning and Environmental Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: April 14, 2014
Subject: A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment
to a Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-
9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in
gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located
at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block
5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC130046)
Applicant: Deltec Bank and Trust, represented by Eggers Architect
Planner: Jonathan Spence
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Deltec Bank and Trust, represented by Eggers Architecture, Inc., is
requesting a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to a
Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10,
Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential
floor area to facilitate additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow
Units 501 and 502 (Vail Village Inn Phase 3)
Based upon Staff’s review of the criteria outlined in Section VII of this memorandum and
the evidence and testimony presented, the Community Development Department
recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a
recommendation of approval, with conditions, of the major amendment to Special
Development District (SDD) No. 6, Vail Village Inn, subject to the findings noted in
Section VIII of this memorandum.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant is proposing to add approximately 277 square feet of GRFA to Unit 501
and approximately 515 square feet of GRFA to Unit 502. Components of this project
include:
• The main floor entrance of Unit 501 will expand into the existing common area,
capturing 103 square feet of floor area. This expansion coincides with a complete
interior remodel of that level.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 2
• The existing 322 square foot loft of Unit 501 is proposed to be remodeled to
include a bedroom suite and loft area with an increase of 174 square feet.
• A new roof element is being added to Unit 501 to meet egress requirements for
the bedroom suite and loft area. The roof will present as a dormer on the north
elevation and as a gable end element on the south elevation. The ridgeline of the
proposed gable matches the existing ridgeline of the building.
• The existing 5th floor deck of Unit 501 is proposed to be enlarged to coincide with
the new roof element.
• Unit 502 is proposing an interior remodel that includes a new loft in the attic area
above the unit currently occupied by a suspended mechanical mezzanine. The
mechanicals will be relocated and the 515 square foot loft will consist of an
exercise room with an attached bath and steam room.
• A shed dormer is proposed to provide natural lighting to the new loft area of Unit
502. This dormer bridges the existing tower elements and is approximately three
(3) feet above the existing ridge.
• All new roof elements and the existing roofs of levels four and five will be clad in
DaVinci Shakes. The existing roof was shingled with natural wood shakes in
2005. The remaining wood shingle elements in existence on levels two and three
will be replaced in the future with DaVinci Shakes to match.
• Replacement of the existing outdated street lights located along the Frontage
Road with lights that meet Town of Vail specifications.
The applicant has provided a written description of their request, (Attachment A) and
plans, (Attachment B), both dated April 4, 2014.
III. BACKGROUND
In 1976, the Vail Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1976, establishing
Special Development District No.6, Vail Village Inn. The purpose of SDD No.6 is to
assure the comprehensive development and use of an area of land in a manner that
would be harmonious with the general character of the town, provide adequate open
space and recreation amenities, and promote the objectives of the zoning ordinance
of the town. Ordinarily, a special development district will be created only when the
development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council, Planning
and Environmental Commission, and Design Review Board, and there are significant
aspects of the development which cannot be satisfied under the existing zoning.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 3
Project History:
The following is a summary of the existing phases and development for the Vail
Village Inn Special Development District (SDD No. 6):
Phase I- This phase consists of the buildings located at the southeast corner of
the District. Phase I includes one residential dwelling unit approximately 3,927
square feet in size and nine commercial/retail spaces. The original development
plan for Phase I called for 16,128 square feet of commercial space, and no
GRFA. The AIpenrose Restaurant is part of Phase I.
Phase II- This phase consists of three residential dwelling units totaling
approximately 3,492 square feet in size and three commercial/retail spaces.
Phase II is generally located in the center of the District and includes the
Claggett-Rey Gallery.
Phase Ill- This Phase consists of twenty-nine residential dwelling units totaling
approximately 44,830 square feet in size and six commercial/retail spaces.
Phase Ill is located at the northeast corner of the District.
Phase IV- This is the original, oldest and most recently redeveloped Phase in the
District. This Phase (The Sebastian) consists of two residential dwelling units
totaling approximately 6,827 square feet in size, one hundred accommodation
units and forty-nine fractional fee units comprising approximately 97,788 square
feet of floor area. Phase IV is generally located in the northwest corner of the
District.
Phase V- This Phase consists of eleven residential dwelling units and three
accommodation units totaling approximately 9,972 square feet of floor area and
four commercial/retail spaces. Phase V is located in the southwest corner of the
District at the intersection of Vail Road and East Meadow Drive. This phase
includes the La Botega restaurant.
Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1985 (March, 1985) granted 120,600 square feet of GRFA to
SDD No. 6. This ordinance also required a minimum of 175 accommodation units (AUs)
and 72,400 square feet of GRFA, devoted entirely to AUs in Phase IV.
Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1987 (May, 1987), amended Phase IV of SDD No. 6. The
amendment allowed Phase IV to be broken into two distinct and separate phases, which
were called Phase IV and Phase V. This ordinance also set the maximum GRFA for the
SDD at 120,600 square feet. Further, the ordinance required a minimum of 148 AUs
and 67,367 square feet of GRFA devoted to AUs in Phases IV and V.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 4
Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989 (November, 1989) amended the density section of
SDD No. 6. This ordinance modified the SOD by increasing the allowable GRFA to a
total of 124,527 square feet. This allowed Unit No. 30 (originally Good's retail) in the Vail
Village Plaza Condominiums to be converted from commercial to residential use. The
space consists of 3,927 square feet of GRFA, and the conversion to residential use has
been completed. This ordinance also maintained the approval for a minimum of 148
AUs and 67,367 square feet of GRFA, devoted to AUs, in Phases IV and V of SDD
No.6.
Ordinance No. 1 and No. 4, Series of 2000, a major amendment to Special
Development District No. 6 was approved to allow for construction of the Vail Plaza
Hotel.
Ordinance No. 15, Series of 2001 adopted a revised Approved Development Plan for
Phase II, which brought the total allowable GRFA for the entire SDD No. 6 to 182,325
square feet.
Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2001 adopted a revised Approved Development Plan for
Phase IV (i.e. Vail Plaza Hotel), and did not specify, in the form of a revised Approved
Development Plan, the total allowable GRFA for the entirety of SDD No. 6.
Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2003, adopted a major amendment to SDD No. 6, allowing
for the construction of a new dwelling unit above the Alpenrose Restaurant location,
which increase the amount of allowable GRFA for the entire SDD to 184,708 sq. ft. and
increase the density to 13 DU's per acre.
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2005, adopted a major amendment to SDD No. 6, revising
the amount of allowable GRFA for the entire SDD to 186,561 sq. ft. and increasing the
density to 13.25 DU's per acre.
IV. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
A. Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code
CHAPTER 12-1, TITLE, PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY (in part)
Section 12-1-2: Purpose:
A. General: These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Town, and to promote the
coordinated and harmonious development of the Town in a manner that will
conserve and enhance its natural environment and its established character as a
resort and residential community of high quality.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 5
B. Specific: These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific
purposes:
1. To provide for adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage, and public facilities.
2. To secure safety from fire, panic, flood, avalanche, accumulation of snow, and
other dangerous conditions.
3. To promote safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation and to
lessen congestion in the streets.
4. To promote adequate and appropriately located off-street parking and loading
facilities.
5. To conserve and maintain established community qualities and economic
values.
6. To encourage a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land
uses, consistent with Municipal development objectives.
7. To prevent excessive population densities and overcrowding of the land with
structures.
8. To safeguard and enhance the appearance of the Town.
9. To conserve and protect wildlife, streams, woods, hillsides, and other desirable
natural features.
10. To assure adequate open space, recreation opportunities, and other
amenities and facilities conducive to desired living quarters.
11. To otherwise provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community.
ARTICLE 12-9A, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (in part)
12-9A-1: Purpose and Applicability:
A. Purpose: The purpose of the special development district is to encourage
flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most
appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of the new
development with the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of
streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space
areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail
comprehensive plan. An approved development plan for a special development
district, in conjunction with the property's underlying zone district, shall establish
the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the
special development district.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 6
B. Applicability: Special development districts do not apply to and are not
available in the following zone districts: hillside residential, single-family
residential, two-family residential and two-family primary/secondary residential.
12-9A-10: AMENDMENT PROCEDURES:
B. Major Amendments:
1. Requests for major amendments to an approved special development district
shall be reviewed in accordance with the procedures described in section 12-
9A-4 of this article.
2. Owners of all property requesting the amendment, or their agents or
authorized representatives, shall sign the application. Notification of the
proposed amendment shall be made to owners of all property adjacent to the
property requesting the proposed amendment, owners of all property adjacent
to the special development district, and owners of all property within the
special development district that may be affected by the proposed amendment
(as determined by the department of community development). Notification
procedures shall be as outlined in subsection 12-3-6C of this title.
V. SURROUNDING LAND USES
Land Uses Zoning
North: CDOT right-of-way Not Zoned
South: Mixed Use Public Accommodation
East: Mixed Use SDD #39 (Solaris)
West: Multiple Family SDD #21 (Gateway)
VI. ZONING ANALYSIS/SDD #6, PHASE III
Development Standard Approved/ Existing Proposed Change
Gross Residential
Floor Area (GRFA)
Unit 501
Unit 502
Total Phase III
SDD #6
2,467 sq. ft.
1,399 sq. ft.
46,067 sq. ft.
2,744 sq. ft.
1,914 sq. ft.
46,859 sq. ft.
+277 sq. ft.
+515 sq. ft.
+792 sq. ft. (1.7%↑)
Parking 108 spaces
1.4 spaces per unit
108 spaces
1.4 spaces per unit
No change
Dwelling Units (DUs) 11 Dwelling Units 11 Dwelling Units No change
Height 5 stories (74.3’ per
SDD)
5 stories (74.3’ per
SDD)
No change (new roof
elements @ 67.6’)
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 7
Site Coverage 55% (per SDD) 38% No change
Landscaping 30% (per SDD) 57% No change
VII. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA
Before acting on a major amendment to a special development district amendment
application, the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council shall
consider the following factors with respect to the proposal:
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
In contrast to other phases of SDD #6, Phase III has seen relatively few amendments.
The structure has seen minor changes since its original construction, mainly exterior
window updates and interior remodels, but remains largely unchanged from its original
build. The proposed modifications will add interest and detail to the building and assists
in its relationship to the more recently constructed adjacent properties.
Staff believes that the proposed additions are compatible with the neighborhood related
to architectural design and style. The additions will have a minor effect on the building’s
perceived mass and scale. The application has followed the guidelines recommended in
the Vail Village Urban Design Standards by locating the infill out of sun/shade or views
as illustrated by the drawings below:
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 8
The proposal complies with the overall height limit of the district as the proposed
dormers do not increase the building’s height. The new roof forms follow the flow of the
existing roof forms to allow the viewer’s eye to carry, resulting in a complete building
whose additions are not over dominant or recognizable. The building additions are of
appropriate scale for the structure and are compatible with the character of the
neighborhood.
Staff finds the proposal does comply with this criterion.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient
and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
The proposal does not propose to change any of the uses, activity, or densities which
are currently constructed within the project. The proposal to increase the allowable
GRFA within the SDD requires mitigation of the impacts to employee generation
pursuant to Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The applicant has
stated in their written materials that the pay-in-lieu option would be selected if the
proposal were approved. An increase in the allowable GRFA by 792 square feet results
in a pay-in-lieu fee of $10,664.00 (79.2 s.f. x $134.65) under the existing adopted fee
schedule. The pay-in-lieu fee is currently under its annual review with potential changes
occurring in April. The required payment is calculated at the time of building permit
submittal and may be different that the number above.
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as
outlined in chapter 10 of this title.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 9
The proposal to add approximately 792 square feet of GRFA to Units 501 and 502 do
not change the required parking or loading and delivery requirements for the
development.
As a component of the approval for the Sebastian, its developer was required to provide
a centralized loading and delivery facility for the use of all owners and tenants within
SDD #6 and also to be made available for public and/or private loading and delivery
programs. The continued use of this facility is vital in mitigating the loading and delivery
impacts upon Vail Village.
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail
comprehensive plan, town policies and urban design plans.
Staff has reviewed the Vail comprehensive plan and found the following documents and
associated goals, objectives, statements applicable to this proposal.
Vail Land Use Plan (in part)
1. General Growth / Development
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve
both the visitor and the permanent resident.
1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing
developed areas (infill areas).
4. Village Core / Lionshead
4.1. Future commercial development should continue to occur primarily in
existing commercial areas. Future commercial development in the Core
areas needs to be carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery.
4.2. Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing
character of each area is preserved through implementation of the Urban
Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan.
4.3. The ambiance of the Village is important to the identity of Vail and should
be preserved. (Scale, alpine character, small town feeling, mountains,
natural settings, intimate size, cosmopolitan feeling, environmental
quality.)
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 10
5. Residential
5.1. Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing,
platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not
exist.
Vail Village Master Plan (in part)
V. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND ACTION STEPS
GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING
UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO
SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY.
Objective 1.1: Implement a consistent development review process to reinforce the
character of the Village.
Policy 1.1.1: Development and improvement projects approved in the Village
shall be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and design considerations
as outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design Guide Plan.
Objective 1.2: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: Additional development may be allowed as identified by the Action
Plan and as is consistent with the Vail Village Master Plan and Urban Design
Guide Plan.
VII. VAIL VILLAGE SUB-AREAS
A major goal of this Plan is to address the Village as a whole and at the same
time be sensitive to the opportunities and constraints that may exist on a site
specific basis. To facilitate long range planning unique to each area of the
Village, ten different sub-areas are delineated in this Plan. Sub-areas were
determined based on a number of different considerations. Foremost among
these were:
• design and site characteristics
• geographic or physical boundaries
• land uses and ownership patterns
Each of the ten sub-areas have been evaluated relative to the overall goals,
objectives, and policies outlined for Vail Village. The potential improvement
projects, referred to as sub-area concepts, which have emerged from this
evaluation are graphically represented on the Action Plan. These sub-area
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 11
concepts are physical improvements intended to reinforce the desired physical
form of the Village as outlined in the various elements of the Master Plan.
The 10 sub-areas (which follow), provide detailed descriptions of each sub-area
concept and express the relationship between the specific sub-area concepts
and the overall Plan. The applicable goals and objectives are cited for each of
the sub area concepts at the end of each description under "special emphasis."
The sub-area concepts described in this Section are meant to serve as advisory
guidelines for future land use decisions by the Planning and Environmental
Commission and the Town Council. Compliance with the sub-area concepts
does not assure development approval by the Town.
It is important to note that the likelihood of project approval will be greatest for
those proposals that can fully comply with the Vail Village Master Plan. The
Urban Design Guide Plan includes additional design detail that is to be used in
conjunction with the Vail Village Master Plan sub-area concepts.
MIXED USE SUB-AREA (#1)
The Mixed-Use sub-area is a prominent activity center for Vail Village. It is
distinguished from the Village core by the larger scale buildings and by the limited
auto traffic along East Meadow Drive. Comprised of five major development
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 12
projects, this sub-area is characterized by a mixture of residential/lodging and
commercial activity.
The Vail Comprehensive Plan elements that speak to this site include the Vail Land Use
Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. Staff believes the proposed changes do not
have an overall negative impact on the intent of stepping buildings up from the
pedestrian oriented East Meadow Drive to the South Frontage Road East.
The proposed building additions are consistent with the infill recommendations of the
Vail Village Urban Design Guidelines. The additions are located such that their impacts
on adjacent properties and on the pedestrian experience are minimal to nonexistent.
The changes to the roof form allow the greater utilization of the upper residential units
without the roof reading as cluttered or haphazard.
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
5. Natural and/or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or
geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development
district is proposed.
Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, is not located within any identified
geologic hazard.
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space
provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and
sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
The proposal does not include any changes to the site plan, building footprint design or
location, or open space provisions. The proposal does include modifications to the roof
plan that will allow the greater utilization of the top floor residential units. The new roof
elements are designed to be compatible both with the existing structure and the overall
design of the district.
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off site traffic circulation.
The proposal does not include any changes to the pedestrian or vehicular circulation on
or off site.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 13
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to
optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function.
The proposal does not include any changes to the landscaping or open space on the
site as identified on the approved development plan.
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
The proposal is intended to be constructed in one phase. Staging for any construction
related activity will be reviewed by the Town of Vail staff to ensure impacts are
minimized to public rights-of-way and adjacent properties. It is anticipated that the use
of the South Frontage Road East right-of-way will be necessary. This right-of-way is
controlled by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and will require all
appropriate review and permits from CDOT should the project move forward.
Staff finds the proposal complies with this criterion.
10. Public Benefit: The proposed deviations provide benefits to the town must
outweigh the adverse effects of such deviations.
As a component of this project, the applicant is proposing to use DaVinci shake shingles
on all new roof elements and to replace the existing roofs of levels four and five,
currently clad in wood shake, with the polymer based composite roof. This change in
roofing material over a significant portion of the building will reduce fire risks for the
residents in this building and in the general vicinity.
Also included as component of this project is the replacement of the existing outdated
street light fixtures along the Frontage Road with TOV approved street lights. As the
current plans do not illustrate this element, staff has included an appropriate condition of
approval.
It should be noted that Village Inn Plaza Phase III completed a rehabilitation of many of
its exterior, pedestrian level elements in 2009. Phase I and II are anticipated to act on a
recent DRB approval to complete these improvements in the district that include new
pavers, site walls, ADA access and landscaping. Although not tied to this proposal,
these improvements demonstrate Vail Village Inn’s commitment to maintaining and
improving public spaces.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 14
Staff believes that the benefits to the Town including the replacement of outdated street
lighting and a reduction in the fire risk to the area outweighs any adverse impacts
associated with the proposal.
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and
Environmental Commission forwards a recommendation of approval, with
conditions, to the Town Council on a major amendment to a Special Development
District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures,
Vail Town Code, to allow for an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate
additions to existing dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail
Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in
regard thereto. Staff’s recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria
described in Section VII of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony
presented.
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community
Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion:
“The Planning and Environmental Commission forwards a
recommendation of approval to the Town Council for a major amendment
to Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to
Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for
an increase in gross residential floor area to facilitate additions to existing
dwelling units, located at 100 East Meadow Units 501 and 502 (Vail
Village Inn Phase 3) /Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting
forth details in regard thereto.”
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community
Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings:
“Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VII this Staff
memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated April
14, 2014, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and
Environmental Commission finds:
1. That the special development district amendment complies with the
standards listed Article 12-9A, Special Development District, or that a
practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 15
2. That the special development district amendment is consistent with the
adopted goals, objectives and policies outlined in the Vail
comprehensive plan and compatible with the development objectives
of the town; and
3. That the special development district amendment is compatible with
and suitable to adjacent uses and appropriate for the surrounding
areas; and
4. That the special development district amendment promotes the health,
safety, morals, and general welfare of the town and promotes the
coordinated and harmonious development of the town in a manner that
conserves and enhances its natural environment and its established
character as a resort and residential community of the highest quality.”
Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to forward a
recommendation of approval, with conditions, for this request, the Community
Development Department recommends the Commission applies the following
conditions:
1. This SDD major amendment approval is contingent upon the applicant
obtaining Town of Vail approval of the associated design review
application, including compliance with Sec. 14-10-5 Building Materials
and Design, Vail Town Code
2. The applicant shall mitigate the employee generation impact created by
the addition of 792 square feet of GRFA in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 12-24, Inclusionary Zoning, Vail Town Code. The
applicant shall make the required fee in lieu payment to the Town of
Vail prior to the issuance of any building permit.
3. The applicant shall receive and submit in conjunction with the building
permit, all applicable Colorado Department of Transportation approvals
for all impacts to the South Frontage Road East, including construction
staging, if necessary.
4. The applicant shall amend the recorded condominium map to reflect the
increase in floor area and space designation, prior to requesting any
certificate of occupancy inspection.
5. The applicant shall replace the three (3) existing street lights located
along the Frontage Road with Town of Vail street lights per Public
Work’s specification. The location of the streetlights is depicted in the
Streetlight Exhibit, included as Attachment C to the May 6, 2014
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 16
PEC130046 Town Council Memo. The number of new fixtures shall be
determined by the Director of Public Works and will not exceed three.
The new street lights shall be installed prior to requesting any
certificate of occupancy inspection.
IX. ATTACHMENTS
A. Written Request dated April 4, 2014
B. Proposed Plans dated April 4, 2014
5/6/2014
Village Inn Plaza
Vail Village Inn, SDD #6, Phase III
Major Amendment to
Special District No. 6
Expansion of Units 501 & 502 with
Exterior Modifications
December 30, 2013
Amended March 12, 2014
Amended April 4, 2014
5/6/2014
I. Introduction
The owners of units 501 and 502, Lublan S.A., represented by Loguer Design and Eggers
Architecture, Inc., are requesting a major amendment to Special Development District No.6
(SDD#6) to allow for the remodel and expansion of their units. Unit 501 (parcel #: 2101-
082-54-027) is proposing to increase the GRFA by 277 square feet and includes exterior
changes to the building including the addition of secondary roof forms. Unit 502 (parcel #:
2101-082-54-028) is proposing to increase the GRFA by 515 square feet and includes the
addition of secondary roof forms. The modification of Unit 502 also includes the relocation
of an existing mechanical mezzanine to a newly constructed area with a net square
footage loss of 49 square feet. According to Section 12-9A-2: Definitions, Vail Town Code,
an increase of GRFA is considered a Major SDD Amendment.
Unit 501 is proposing to undergo a complete interior remodel. The current plan includes 4
bedrooms, 4 baths and major living spaces on the main level of 2145 square feet. This
plan has a loft area overlooking the main living space that includes 322 square feet. The
remodel proposes to redesign the main level into three bedrooms and baths with an entry
area expanded in to the common hallway between units 501 and 502. The new square
footage of the main level will be 2248 square feet, an increase of 103 square feet.
Additionally, the loft area will be remodel to include a bedroom suite and loft area
overlooking the common area. This new space will include 496 square feet of space, an
increase of 174 square feet. Total new GRFA will be 2744 square feet or an increase of
277 square feet on both levels. In order to meet egress requirements for the bedroom on
the loft level, a new roof element is being added. The roof will present as a dormer on the
north elevation and as a gable end element on the south elevation. The ridge line of the
proposed gable matches the existing ridgeline of the building and does not represent a
change is the building height. The size and configuration of the gable element is
consistent with the existing gable elements on the south elevation.
Unit 502 is proposing to remodel the existing kitchen/living area and update the bathrooms
in the unit. Additionally, a loft is proposed in the attic area immediately above the unit.
There currently exists a suspended mechanical mezzanine between the ceiling of the Unit
502 and the structural roof members. This loft area is 150 square feet is size. By
relocating and constructing a new mechanical area in the attic space immediately adjacent
and above the common area, the attic space can be utilized as living space by Unit 502.
This area is proposed as an exercise room with an attached bath and steam room. A shed
dormer is proposed for this area to allow for natural lighting. The roof element is above the
main ridgeline of the building but lower than the two elevator tower units on each side of
the dormer. This proposed loft represents an increase in the GRFA of 515 square feet to
the unit.
5/6/2014
Floor plans of the proposed changes are provided below:
5/6/2014
II. Background
Village Inn Plaza is located at 100 East Meadow Drive. The property is part of Phase III of
Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. This SDD has an underlying zoning of
Public Accommodation (PA). See vicinity map of property below:
SDD #6 was adopted by Ordinance No. 7 of 1976 and has undergone multiple
amendments since is adoption. Most of the amendments have been associated with the
other phases of the SDD. The structure has seen minor changes since its original
construction, mainly exterior window updates and interior remodels, but remains largely
unchanged from its original construction. The proposed modifications will be add some
exterior detail and update the appearance of the building to match the architectural
detailing of the more recently constructed adjacent properties. See photo of the frontage
road view taken from the north side of the highway:
5/6/2014
Vail Village Inn deviates from the maximum height limitation set forth in the Public
Accommodation zone district of 48 feet for sloped roofs. Building heights were defined by
number of stories in the original adoption of SDD#6 and further illustrated in a drawing
created by consultants Royston, Hanamoto, Beck and Abey dated February 12, 1976. The
building was constructed according to these height restrictions and has not been modified
since. The new major gable element matches the existing ridgeline and the new dormer is
lower in height than the existing elevator shaft roof elements, therefore not affecting the
overall building height. See drawing below:
There are no additional parking requirements as the number of units is not changing.
III. Zoning Analysis
The proposed modification only affects the GRFA and Employee Housing standards of the
zoning analysis. All other standards are unchanged and remain as approved by Special
Development District #6.
Standard Existing Proposed
GRFA
Unit 501
Unit 502
2467sf
1399 sf
2744 sf (277 additional)
1914 sf (515 additional)
Parking 1.4 spaces per unit No change
Employee Housing Approved prior to
Inclusionary Requirement
79 sf (pay-in-lieu)
5/6/2014
IV. Criteria for Review for the Major Amendment to a Special Development District
Section 12-9A-8: Design Criteria and Necessary Findings in the Vail Town Code provides
the criteria for review of a Major Amendment to a Special Development District. Below is a
listing of the criteria and how the proposal complies with each:
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building
height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.
Proposed: The architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity,
character, visual integrity and orientation remains largely unchanged as a result of the
proposed amendment. The roof changes align with the existing ridge, there fore the height
remains the same as constructed.
The massing and detailing of the gable elements is consistent with the adjacent gable
ends on the building and the added elements add a level of architectural character evident
on the newer adjacent properties.
Since originally constructed, the character and level of architectural detailing of the village
has increased dramatically. Adjacent buildings have been approved with greater heights
and the proposed modifications are compatible with the immediate environment.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
Proposed: There is no change to the use, activity or number of dwelling units within the
proposed amendment. The increase is GRFA is consistent with the intent of Chapter 15 of
the Vail Town Code and without the size of the roof elements would qualify as a minor
amendment to the SDD.
5/6/2014
3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in
chapter 10 of this title.
Proposed: The addition of GRFA does not affect the parking requirements for the units
and is unchanged.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive
plan, town policies and urban design plans.
Proposed: Village Inn Plaza is within the boundaries of the Vail Village Master Plan and
further located within Mixed Use Sub-Area #1. The following objectives of the master plan
are applicable to this application:
Objective 1.2:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities.
Objective 2.5:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and
commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
5. Natural And/Or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic
hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements as there are no
changes proposed for the site plan.
7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on
and off site traffic circulation.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional
and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
5/6/2014
V. Photo images:
Below are images taken from Meadow Drive and the Frontage Road. The proposed improvements
are not visible from other locations within the Village.
From Meadow Dr.
From walk below Vail Village Plaza
5/6/2014
From walk below Sebastian
From sidewalk along Frontage Road
5/6/2014
VI. Adjacent Property Owners
Vail Gateway Plaza Condo Association
c/o Vail Tax & Accounting
PO Box 5940
Avon, CO 81620
Vail Plaza Hotel (Sebastian)
c/o Timbers Resorts
16 Vail Road
Vail, CO 81657
Village Inn Plaza Phase I,II,V
c/o Jonathon Staufer, Manager
100 E. Meadow Drive, #31
Vail, CO 81657
Solaris
c/o Peter Noble, John Boord
2211 N. Frontage Road, Suite A
Vail, CO 81657
One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association
c/o Corporation Service Company
1560 Broadway, Suite 2090
Denver, CO 80202
One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association
4148 N Arcadia Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85018
Talisman Condo Association
c/o Ptarmigan Manangement
62 E. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Sonnenalp
c/o Johannes Faessler
20 Vail Road
Vail, CO 81657
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 A Resolution Approving the Purchase of
Property in the Town of Vail Legally Described as Unit 11, Vail Heights Condominiums, Eagle
County, Colorado with a Physical Address of 2079 Chamonix Lane No. 11, Vail, Colorado; and
Setting Forth Details in Regard Thereto.
PRESENTER(S): Nina Timm
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, amend or deny Resolution No. 16, Series of
2014
BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 16 Memorandum
Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014
5/6/2014
To: Vail Town Council
From: Nina Timm, Community Development
Krista Miller, Human Resources/Risk Management
Date: May 6, 2014
Subject: Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 – Purchase of Unit 11, Vail Heights
Condominiums
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 7, 2007 the Town of Vail (the “Town”) deed restricted unit No. 11, Vail
Heights Condominiums. The deed restriction includes a three percent annual price
appreciation cap and additional language that the occupant of the unit shall be a full
time employee of the Town of Vail and their families. In 2007 the Town of Vail sold the
unit to one of its full time employees. That employee has owned the unit and lived in it
since then. At the end of February 2014 that employee purchased a Vail Commons
two-bedroom unit and listed the Vail Heights unit for sale.
The Town actively sought another Town employee to purchase the one-bedroom unit.
At this time no Town employees have come forward to purchase the unit, while in the
past year the Town has seen an uptick in demand from its employees for rental units.
One-bedroom rental units constantly have the highest demand from a renter
perspective.
II. THE UNIT
2079 Chamonix Lane Unit No. 11 is a 564 square foot one-bedroom unit that has been
renovated to include all new flooring, fresh paint and a new refrigerator. Additionally the
Homeowner’s Association recently replaced the central boiler and water heater. The
unit also includes two plus assigned parking spaces, ample on-site storage and on-site
laundry facilities. There is also little highway noise.
The monthly HOA dues of $200 include heat, water and sewer, snow and trash
removal, building insurance, on-site property management, etc.
Under the deed restriction the maximum sale price for the unit is $212,543.87.
5/6/2014
Town of Vail Page 2
The most recent sales in the complex include:
Sale Date
Square
Feet Sale Price
Price / Square
Foot
2011/04/01 564 $225,000 $398.94
2010/10/02 564 $230,000 $407.80
2009/05/29 564 $279,000 $494.68
Proposed Town of Vail Purchase Price
2014/05/16 564 $196,500 $348.40
III. PURCHASE FUNDS
The Town of Vail currently has a Buy Down fund balance of $402,118. Staff
recommends these funds be used for the purchase of Unit 11, Vail Heights
Condominiums.
IV. ACTION REQUESTED OF TOWN COUNCIL
Approve, approve with modifications or deny Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 as
presented.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Vail Town Council approve Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 as
presented. Staff’s recommendation is based on the following:
• The unit was purchased to house Town of Vail employees
• Rental demand is increasing
• Demand for one-bedroom rental units is strongest
• The unit has been recently renovated, has sufficient parking and is well located
• The Town can choose to sell the unit at a later time, maintaining the deed
restriction
VI. ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014
5/6/2014
Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. 16
Series of 2014
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY IN THE TOWN OF
VAIL LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS UNIT 11, VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS, EAGLE
COUNTY, COLORADO WITH A PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF 2079 CHAMONIX LANE
NO. 11, VAIL, COLORADO; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the “Town”), in the County of Eagle and State of
Colorado is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Colorado and the Town Charter; and
WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the “Council”) have
been duly elected and qualified; and
WHEREAS, the Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety
and welfare to purchase the property legally described as Unit 11, Vail Heights
Condominiums, Eagle County, Colorado with a physical address of 2079 Chamonix
Lane No. 11, Vail, Colorado (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Council’s approval of this Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 is
required to purchase the Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT:
1. The purchase price of the Property is hereby approved by the Council at the
purchase price of $196,500 plus the cost of approved capital improvements.
2. The Town Manager is hereby authorized on behalf of the Town to take
whatever steps necessary to complete the purchase of the Property.
3. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2014.
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor, Town of Vail
ATTEST:
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (Estimated 8:30 p.m.)
5/6/2014
Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. 16
Series of 2014
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY IN THE TOWN OF
VAIL LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS UNIT 11, VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS, EAGLE
COUNTY, COLORADO WITH A PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF 2079 CHAMONIX LANE
NO. 11, VAIL, COLORADO; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the “Town”), in the County of Eagle and State of
Colorado is a home rule municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Colorado and the Town Charter; and
WHEREAS, the members of the Town Council of the Town (the “Council”) have
been duly elected and qualified; and
WHEREAS, the Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety
and welfare to purchase the property legally described as Unit 11, Vail Heights
Condominiums, Eagle County, Colorado with a physical address of 2079 Chamonix
Lane No. 11, Vail, Colorado (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Council’s approval of this Resolution No. 16, Series of 2014 is
required to purchase the Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT:
1. The purchase price of the Property is hereby approved by the Council at the
purchase price of $196,500 plus the cost of approved capital improvements.
2. The Town Manager is hereby authorized on behalf of the Town to take
whatever steps necessary to complete the purchase of the Property.
3. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2014.
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor, Town of Vail
ATTEST:
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
5/6/2014
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (Estimated 8:30 p.m.)
5/6/2014