Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-09-02 Agenda and Supporting Documentation Town Council Work SessionNOTE 1 E 3 M 5 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 12:30 P.M., SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 TOWN OF VAIL7 Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time Council will consider an item. Public comments on work session item may be solicited by the Town Council. ITEM/TOPIC: Booth Creek Park Site Visit (60 min. ) PRESENTER(S): Todd Oppenhiemer, Public Works ITEM/TOPIC: Bridge Road Bridge on Gore Creek Site Visit (East Vail) (15 min.) PRESENTER(S): Chad Salli, Public Works ITEM/TOPIC: Lower Bench proposed Phase III Ford Park Site Visit. Additionally, there is an attached site plan for your reference. (30 min. ) PRESENTER(S): Todd Oppenheimer, Public Works ITEM/TOPIC: DRB/PEC Update (10 min. ) PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell, Community Development ITEM/TOPIC: Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Discussion (15 min) PRESENTER(S): Chad Salli, Public Works ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide feedback on the bridge alignment alternatives, sanitary sewer alignment alternatives and aesthetics of the new structure. BACKGROUND: In 2011 the Town received a bridge replacement grant for reconstruction of Bridge Road over the Gore Creek. The Bridge Road structure is scheduled for construction in 2016 with preliminary engineering and design starting 2014. Town staff had identified 5 alternative alignments for the new structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a bridge alignment that would fall somewhere between the 60' and 80' span length keeping the new structure and roadway approaches in its current alignment and keep the sewer main in its current location with a new casing pipe. ITEM/TOPIC: Vail Village Character Area Preservation. The purpose of this work session to request direction on approaches to address five (5) identified elements to ensure/24018pecial character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan. The public, Planning and Environmental Commission, staff, and consultant have reviewed the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations to address the adopted problem statement. The Vail Town Council will be given a presentation highlighting the public process and resulting recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission in pursuing the direction provided by Vail Town Council in the adopted problem statement. As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur to the physical features of Vail Village, are the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. (60 min.) PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell, Community Development Department and Tom Braun, Braun and Associates ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall adopt, adopt with modifications, or reject the proposed recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Does the Vail Town Council support the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission to address Landmarks, Boundaries of the Urban Design Guide Plan, Non -conforming properties and redevelopment, Architectural Character, and Specific Design Elements of the Urban Design Guide Plan? If yes, Should Town staff pursue a public process with the community to discuss the implementation and adoption of amendments to the regulatory tools used to carry out the Town's development objectives for Vail Village? BACKGROUND: On July 28, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously forwarded a recommendation of approval to proceed forward with the Vail Village Character Area Preservation initiative to examine and implement approaches to address the identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the application and implementation Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Vail Town Council adopts the recommendations to proceed forward with an effort to address identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan. 7. ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update: 1) June Vail Business RevieW/2kd Quarter 2) July Sales Tax Memorandum 3) Revenue Highlights (5 min.) 8. ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from the Mayor, Council and Committee Reports. (15 min.) 9. ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Regarding: update on pending litigation concerning Staufer Commercial LLC v. Vail Village Inn Plaza Phase 5 Condominiums Case number 2014CV30259; 2) C.R.S. §24- 6-402(4)(a)(b)(e) - to discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of property interests; to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Regarding: Negotiations concerning the Timber Ridge Ground Lease Agreement. (20 min. ) PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire, Town Attorney 10. ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (estimated 4:20 p.m.) NOTE: UPCOMING MEETING TOPICS AND ESTIMATED TIMEFRAMES BELOW (ALL ARE APPROXIMATE DATES AND TIMES AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) THE NEXT REGULAR VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 12:30 P.M. (or TBD), TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Ongoing agenda items DRB/PEC updates WS - 15 min.; Information Updates Attachments: WS - 15 min.; Executive Session items: 30 min.; Consent Agenda: 5 min.; Town Manager Report: 5 min. Other agenda items: Discussion of Five Year Capital & RETT Plans - WS - 9/16 VVMC Master Plan Discussion - WS - 9/16 Special VLMD Work Session for 2015 Operating Plan and Budget - 9/16 Lower Bench Ford Park Update - 9/16 GOCO Resolutions - 9/16 Golf Course Update - 9/16 Responses from Town of Vail Picnic Comments - WS - 9/16 (Info Update) Half Day Retreat w/ VLHA - WS - 10/7 Municipal Building Update WS - 10/7 Council's Action Plan Review - WS - 10/21 Discussion on Town Manager's Budget (Final Draft) - WS - 10/21 Quarterly Status Report on Capital Projects & Programs (Info Update) - WS -10/21 VLMD Meeting and Budget Resolution (consent agenda) - 10/21 First Reading of Ordinance Budget Adoption - ES - 11/4 Discussion on Aspen Report/&2F ilow up - WS - 11/4 Second Reading of Ordinance Budget Adoption - ES - 11/18 Council Action Plan Items: Defining Balanced Community, Follow-up Competitiveness Plan, Parking & Transportation, Technology - TBD Piney Road Site Visit - TBD Lionshead Skate Park Update - TBD Ford Park Parking Reservation System - TBD Meet with Avon Town Council - TBD Investment Policy Update ES - TBD 1-70 Vail Underpass Updates - ES - TBD Clean Up Title 12 Ordinance - TBD Plastic bags - TBD Village Information Center - Greg - TBD Fee Schedule changes - George - TBD Housing Strategic Plan - George - TBD 2015 WAC updates (construction restrictions, legacy program) - WS - TBD Sister City discussion - TBD Streaming PEC & DRB - TBD VLMD Term limits - TBD Walking Mountains zero waste program presentation - TBD 9/2/2014 rnwH of vn' �Ii1 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Booth Creek Park Site Visit PRESENTER(S): Todd Oppenhiemer, Public Works 9/2/2014 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Bridge Road Bridge on Gore Creek Site Visit (East Vail) PRESENTER(S): Chad Salli, Public Works 9/2/2014 rnwH of vn' �Ii1 rnwH of vn' �Ii1 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Lower Bench proposed Phase III Ford Park Site Visit. Additionally, there is an attached site plan for your reference. PRESENTER(S): Todd Oppenheimer, Public Works ATTACHMENTS: Ford Park Lower Bench Site Plan 9/2/2014 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: DRB/PEC Update PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell, Community Development ATTACHMENTS: August 20, 2014 DRB Meeting Results August 25, 2014 PEC Meeting Results 9/2/2014 rnwH of vn' �Ii1 TOWN OF VAI1' DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA PUBLIC MEETING August 20, 2014 Council Chambers 75 South Frontage Road West - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Tom DuBois Bill Pierce Brian Gillette Andy Forstl Rollie Kjesbo PROJECT ORIENTATION SITE VISITS 1. 5087 Main Gore Drive — Leever Residence 2. 4288 Nugget Lane — Lot 2, Bighorn Estates 3. 1632 Buffehr Creek Road — Lot 5, Elk Meadows 4. 225 Wall Street — Wall Street Building MAIN AGENDA Mill Creek Property LLC DRB140245 Final review of changes to approved plans (pool facade, gate) 305 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Mill Creek Property LLC, represented by K.H. Webb Architects ACTION: Tabled to September 3, 2014 MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 3-0-0 2. 1632 Buffehr Creek Road LLC DRB140307 Final review of new construction (single family) 1632 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 5, Elk Meadows Applicant: Elk Meadows Development, LLC, represented by Suman Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 3-0-0 3. Wall Street Retail DRB140335 Final review of changes to approved plans (commercial expansion northeast corner) 225 Wall Street/Lots B & C, Block 5C, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Wall Street Retail LLC, represented by Suman Architects ACTION: Approved MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 3-0-0 4. Nugget Properties LLC DRB140312 Final review of new construction (duplex) 4288 Nugget Lane/Lot 2, Bighorn Estates Applicant: Nugget Properties LLC, represented by Scott Turnipseed Architects ACTION: Approved with a condition MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 3-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1:OOpm 3:OOpm Warren Joe Warren Joe 1) With the building permit application, the applicant shall submit a landscape plan showing native grasses within the drainage swale, rather than river rock. 9/2/20pbge 1 5. Pietrini Residence DRB140309 Jonathan Final review of new construction (duplex) 182 West Meadow Drive/Lot 5 Vail Village Filing 2 Applicant: Meribel Corporation, represented by Pierce Architects ACTION: Approved with a condition MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 3-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1) The approved materials include Autumn Davinci shingles, black clad windows, Rustic Wood Siding and Farmer's Blend Stone Veneer, as shown at hearing. 6. Leever Residence DRB140314 Joe Final review of new construction (single family) 5087 Main Gore Drive/Lots 2 & 3, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision 5t" Addition Applicant: Harold Leever, represented by Berglund Architects ACTION: Approved with a condition MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Gillette VOTE: 3-0-0 CONDITION(S): 1) Before the issuance of a building permit, an environmental impact report shall be submitted by the applicant, and reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. STAFF APPROVALS Stone Residence DRB140287 Final review of an addition (breakfast room & storage) 1241 Westhaven Circle/Lot 44, Glen Lyon Subdivision Applicant: Howard & Cathy Stone, represented by Aker Architects Jonathan Hubbard Residence DRB140292 Joe Final review of changes to approved plans (addition) 146 Forest Road/Lot 6, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Will Hubbard, represented by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects Chedraui Residence DRB140298 Final review of changes to approved plans (window/deck) 68 East Meadow Drive/Lot O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Gies Architects, represented by David Burns Joe Halpert Residence DRB140300 Jonathan Final review of a minor exterior alteration (deck, patio) 1054 Homestake Circle/Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 8 Applicant: Michael Halpert, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects Northwoods Condominium Association DRB140301 Joe Final review of a minor exterior alteration (siding) 600 Vail Valley Drive/Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7 Applicant: Northwoods Condominium Association represented by Zehren & Associates Inc. Horvitz Residence DRB140304 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 1255 Westhaven Circle/Lot 45, Glen Lyon Applicant: Elizabeth Horvitz, represented by Earth -Wise Horticultural 9/2/20pbge 2 Lion Square Lodge DRB140310 Warren Final review of changes to approved plans (walkway, deck) 660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 First Addition Applicant: Lion Square Lodge, represented by Bill Anderson Ford and Carey Residences DRB140311 Jonathan Final review of a minor exterior alteration (driveway) 2765 & 2785 Bald Mountain Road/Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 13 Applicant: Robert Ford, represented by Peel/Langewalter Architects — Kathy Langenwalter Bridge Street Building Condominiums DRB140316 Jonathan Final review of a minor exterior alteration (cooling unit) 288 Bridge Street/Lots C & D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Bridge Street Building Condominium Association, represented by Sortland Contractors Adler Residence DRB140320 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (windows/bedroom) 5020 Main Gore Drive Unit F-2/Vail East Townhomes Applicant: Jan & Frances Adler, represented by SIRE Building Associates Appel Residence DRB140321 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (sky lights/sliding doors) 9 Vail Road Unit 41/Lot B, Vail Village Filing 2 Applicant: Joel Appel represented by Rocky Mountain Construction Group Thomas Residence DRB140322 Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 4027 Lupine Drive/Lot 6, Bighorn Subdivision Applicant: Trudy Thomas, represented by Ceres Land Care Warren Chamonix Chalets DRB140323 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 2456 & 2469 Chamonix Lane/Lot 5, Block B, and Lots 15 & 16, Block C, Vail Das Shone Filing 1 Applicant: Chamonix Chalets, represented by Avalanche Property Management Cogswell Gallery DRB140324 Joe Final review of a sign application (business ID) 223 Gore Creek Drive Unit A (Creekside Condominiums)/Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Cogswell Gallery, represented by John Cogswell McIntyre Residence DRB140325 Jonathan Final review of a minor exterior alteration (water feature) 1191 Hornsilver Circle/Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Valley Filing 1 Applicant: Bill & Shirley McIntyre, represented by Pristine Landscapes Sarthou/Corcoran Duplex DRB140326 Joe Final review of a minor exterior alteration (re -roof) 891 Red Sandstone Circle/Lot 4, Vail Village Filing 9 Applicant: Deborah Sarthou and Paul & Cindy Corcoran, represented by G & G Roofing Vigil Residence DRB140327 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (stucco, decks, trim, windows) 3946 Lupine Drive/Lot 5, Block 2, Bighorn Subdivision 15t Addition Applicant: Eduardo & Pilar Vigil, represented by Bob Stephanoff 9/2/20Pbge 3 Bridge Street Building DRB140328 Jonathan Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 288 Bridge Street/Lot D, Block 5A, Vail Village Filing 1 Applicant: Bridge Street Building LLC, represented by Rocky Mountain Construction Group Golden Residence DRB140329 Final review of a minor exterior alteration (deck) 1430 Morraine Drive/Lot 24, Dauphiais-Moseley Subdivision Applicant: Paul & Diane Golden, represented by William Grossart Warren Gramshammer Residence DRB140330 Joe Final review of changes to approved plans (stair, guardrail) 950 Red Sandstone Road/Unplatted Potato Patch Club Applicant: Sheika & Pepi Gramshammer, represented by G.E. Johnson Construction Hartung Residence DRB140332 Joe Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 1726 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 6, Lia Zneimer Subdivision Applicant: Charles & Petey Hartung, represented by Vincent Kuhn Hyatt/Stamper Residence DRB140333 Jonathan Final review of a minor exterior alteration (deck) 1200 Ptarmigan Road Units A & B/Lot 1, Block 8, Vail Village Filing 7 Applicant: Eileen Charles Hyatt, represented by Aspen Grove Construction FG Vail Ltd DRB140336 Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 332 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 11, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 11 Applicant: Sheila Gunn, represented by Ceres Land Care Warren Kirby Residence DRB140338 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (door) 217 Rockledge Road/Lot 13B, Block 7, Vail Village Filing 1/Raether Minor Sub. Applicant: Steve and Suzette Kirby, represented by Eagle Eye Home Management Inc. Goldenberg Residence DRB140347 Warren Final review of a minor exterior alteration (landscaping) 1814 A Glacier Court/Lot 21 A, Lions Ridge Filing 3 Applicant: Karen Goldenberg Revocable Trust, represented by Eagle Tree Company The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. 9/2/20pbge 4 TOWN OF VAIt' PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION August 25, 2014 at 1:00pm TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS / PUBLIC WELCOME 75 S. Frontage Road - Vail, Colorado, 81657 MEMBERS PRESENT Henry Pratt Dick Cleveland Michael Kurz Luke Cartin Pam Hopkins John Rediker Site Visit: 1. 2000 and 2004 Chamonix Lane MEMBERS ABSENT Webb Martin 30 minutes A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a review of the Vail Land Use Plan map, pursuant to Section 8-3, Amendment Process, Vail Land Use Plan, to change the land use designation of 2000 and 2004 Chamonix Lane from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, located at 2000 and 2004 Chamonix Lane/Lots 37 and 38, Buffer Creek Resubdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140026) Applicant: Triumph Development, LLC Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Recommendation of approval MOTION: Rediker Motion failed due to lack of a second ACTION: Recommendation of denial MOTION: Cleveland SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 5-1-0 (Rediker opposed) Items 1 and 2 were discussed simultaneously, while actions on each were independently made. Jonathan Spence gave a presentation pursuant to the staff memorandum. He began with a discussion of the applications, how the two applications are related, and the process. Commissioner Cleveland inquired as to the ownership of the properties. Michael O'Connor, Triumph Development, is under contract and partnered with the current owners. He gave a power point presentation focused on land use policies and goals and the neighborhood history to support the proposal. The presentation highlighted many inconsistences in the built multi -family condition and the adopted zoning for many properties in the area. He concluded the presentation by addressing many of the concerns provided in the written correspondence of the neighboring property owners. Commissioner Hopkins inquired as to any future plans for the town to improve or add to pedestrian network of bike paths and sidewalks. Warren Campbell responded that he was not aware of any plans to extend or improve the pedestrian network in the neighborhood. Commissioner Cartin asked for a clear explanation of the differences between the Land Use Plan Map and Zoning Map, which he felt might be confusing to some in attendance. Jonathan Spence explained the differences and how they were interrelated. He further detailed the criteria for reviewing each of the requests. Commissioner Rediker asked why the property at the intersection of the Frontage Road and Buffehr Creek Road was multi -family but zoned for a duplex and why it is not in conformance with the Land Use Plan. Greg Bemis, resident of Vail, spoke to his knowledge of the property as having being built prior to annexation. Jonathan Spence spoke to the effort undertaken when adopting the Vail Land Use Plan Commissioner Kurz inquired as to the plan and the EHU designated Barbara Brandon, resident across road from the site, spoke to her understanding that the neighborhood has some eye sores and there is some redevelopment needed. Hopes that future redevelopment occurs within existing regulations. This proposal is a jump of 40% in the number of units. Worried about traffic and safety of walking in their quiet neighborhood. When Vail Commons was approved all/majority of traffic was to access off the Frontage Road. She spoke to the preferred Chamonix Master Plan site plan as serving as the "move -up" housing spoken to by the applicant. By her estimation each unit will be in the neighborhood of $600,000 based on recent price per square foot of units recently sold at Pine Ridge Townhomes. Supports a comprehensive approach to developing a master plan for the area which allows for public input. Wendy Erb, lives on Meadow Ridge Road, spoke to the increase in square footage increase from existing and the fact that it will equate to more people at the site. She spoke to her inability to get on buses in the winter due to the number of individuals using the bus. Opposed to piece meal approach to planning the neighborhood. There needs to be a comprehensive approach. The argument of what is next door has consequences as elaborated in several scenarios provided. The plan needs to be headed as creep will occur if the criteria is based upon what is next door. Greg Bemis, highlighted that for each positive the applicant has made there is negative impact as well. For instance to the west is Vail Commons, but to the east in duplex residential. He spoke to the plans he has seen over the years for the redevelopment of the West Vail Mall and Safeway which included multiple floors including residential. Feels like this change leads to a domino effect of increased development. Inquired as to process and the action that would occur today. Commissioner Pratt spoke as to the Commission's role in this review and a future opportunity as the proposal moves forward to the Town Council. Greg Bemis spoke further about his belief that the public notice should extend beyond neighboring properties as West Vail is a neighbor that tries to look out for its neighbors and neighborhood. Wendy Erb spoke to her understanding that the Commission recommendation is heavily weighed by the Town Council. She asked that the Commission send the message to the Town Council that a broader approach to master planning the area. Commissioner Hopkins spoke to her long term residency and asked when the last time a comprehensive review was performed on the Land Use Master Plan. Jonathan Spence spoke to his understanding that the last comprehensive review of the Land Use Master plan occurred at its adoption in the mid 1980's. Commissioner Cartin spoke to the criteria for the Land Use Master Plan and the third criteria which he did not feel was supportive with the application. He spoke to the pockets of low density that were put in place specifically. He spoke to the density projects access off the Frontage Road. Chamonix Lane is a more residentially neighborhood design. Commissioner Cleveland feels Chamonix is a residential street. It does not relate to the Frontage Road or I-70. It is a reach to speak to traffic on I-70 and the Frontage Road. The pockets of low density residential appropriately located. The plan is somewhat conceptual, however, the applicant has not met the criteria and the burden of proof. He feels that this is spot zoning. Commissioner Rediker, spoke to the opposition to the application. Piecemeal zoning is not appropriate. He has spoken in the past in opposition to projects he felt were spot zoning. He feels this is spot zoning. He asked staff to speak to the criteria that should be generally used to determine if a zoning request is "spot zoning". Jonathan Spence provided a response stating the difference between spot zoning and zoning requests which are not is in compliance with adopted plans. He spoke to how the first action in this request with regard to the Land Use Plan Map, if adopted, would negate an argument for spot zoning. Staff's review of the rezoning requested assumed the Land Use Plan Map amendment was recommended for approval. Commissioner Rediker asked staff to respond to its response to Criteria No. 5 and the impacts to the natural environment. How can staff respond to this criteria without a proposed development plan. Jonathan Spence spoke to the town's adopted regulations would address elements such as stormwater run-off, water quality, setbacks, etc. Commissioner Rediker inquired as to staff's response to the third criteria for the Land Use Plan Map amendment regarding support of the Comprehensive Plan. Jonathan Spence spoke to the general goals of the comprehensive plan being met by the proposed redevelopment of the site. Commissioner Kurz spoke his belief that Triumph previous good work however in his neighborhood in East Vail has narrow streets as well and cannot support the proposal. He did not feel change had occurred to warrant the proposed changes. Commissioner Pratt spoke to the fact that there is no guiding master plan for West Vail and that this may be a good time to undertake that effort. Does not feel that the sites warrant "trophy homes" in a neighborhood that doesn't support that approach. He did not feel the Land Use Plan Map amendment does not meet the criteria. Feels affordable townhouse properties are needed in Vail but this proposal today is not is supportable. Commissioner Rediker spoke to the fact that the neighborhood is full of moderate density properties inappropriately zoned for two-family duplexes. Spoke to the likelihood of redevelopment of other greater density projects in the neighborhood. A motion to recommend approval by Commissioner Rediker failed due to a lack of a second. A motion to recommend denial passed. 30 minutes 2. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for a rezoning of 2000 and 2004 Chamonix Lane from Two -Family Primary/Secondary District to Medium Density Multiple -Family District, located at 2000 and 2004 Chamonix Lane/ Lots 37 and 38, Buffer Creek Resubdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140025) Applicant: Triumph Development, LLC Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Recommendation of denial MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Kurz VOTE: 5-1-0 (Rediker opposed) 3. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on the adoption of the Vail Valley Medical Center Master Plan, to establish a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center, Lot 10 (Town of Vail parking lot), and US Bank Building, located at 181 and 281 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West/ Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140011) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell ACTION: Table to September 8, 2014 MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6-0-0 4. A request for the review of a development plan, pursuant to Section 12-8E-6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code and a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-8E-3, Conditional Use, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Ski and Snowboard Vail Club Vail site with a new private and public club and multi -family residential dwelling units, located at 598 Vail Valley Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140020, PEC140023) Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to September 22, 2014 MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6-0-0 5. A request for the review of a final plat, pursuant to Chapter 13-4, Minor Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the re -subdivision of Parcel 1 of the Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Parcel and Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, in order to establish Parcel 3, Golden Peak Ski Base And Recreation District Parcel, the redevelopment site for Ski and Snowboard Club Vail, located at 460 and 598 Vail Valley Drive/Parcel 1, Golden Peak Ski Base and Recreation District Parcel, and Part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140021) Applicant: Ski and Snowboard Club Vail and Vail Corporation, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to September 22, 2014 MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6-0-0 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow a revision to the approved development plan for the Cornerstone site to facilitate the construction of a tensioned membrane structure, located at 1300 Westhaven Drive/Unplatted, (Liftside/Cornerstone) and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140019) Applicant: Charter Sports, represented by Braun & Associates Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to September 22, 2014 MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6-0-0 7. A request for the review of amendments to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C- 3, Conditional Uses, to allow for improvements to a public park and active outdoor recreation area, facility, and use (restroom and picnic pavilion) on the Lower Bench of Ford Park, located at 530 South Frontage Road East/Unplatted (Ford Park), and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC140024) Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Greg Hall Planner: Jonathan Spence ACTION: Table to September 8, 2014 MOTION: Cartin SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 6-0-0 8. Approval of August 11, 2014 minutes MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland 9. Information Update 10. Adjournment MOTION: Kurz SECOND: Cleveland VOTE: 5-0-1(Rediker recused) VOTE: 6-0-0 The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Times and order of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relied upon to determine at what time the Planning and Environmental Commission will consider an item. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department Published August 22, 2014 in the Vail Daily. rnwH of vn' �Ii1 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Discussion PRESENTER(S): Chad Salli, Public Works ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide feedback on the bridge alignment alternatives, sanitary sewer alignment alternatives and aesthetics of the new structure. BACKGROUND: In 2011 the Town received a bridge replacement grant for reconstruction of Bridge Road over the Gore Creek. The Bridge Road structure is scheduled for construction in 2016 with preliminary engineering and design starting 2014. Town staff had identified 5 alternative alignments for the new structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a bridge alignment that would fall somewhere between the 60' and 80' span length keeping the new structure and roadway approaches in its current alignment and keep the sewer main in its current location with a new casing pipe. ATTACHMENTS: Bridge Rd memo Loris & Assoc. Alternatives memo 9/2/2014 TOWN OF Memorandum To: From: Date: Subject Town Council Public Works 8-20-14 Bridge Road Bridge Replacement SUMMARY In 2011 the Town received a bridge replacement grant for reconstruction of Bridge Road over the Gore Creek. The Bridge Road structure is scheduled for construction in 2016 with preliminary engineering and design starting 2014. Town staff had identified 5 alternative alignments for the new structure. The purpose of this Council work session is to present alignment alternatives for the new Bridge Road Bridge to Council and for council to provide feedback on the bridge alignment alternatives, sanitary sewer alignment alternatives and aesthetics of the new structure. PROJECT DETAIL The existing Bridge Road crossing of the Gore Creek is a triple culvert structure and is subject to overtopping due to blockage of one or more of the culverts during high water events. This overtopping of the roadway has required the closure of Bridge Road for safety. The latest bridge inspection report gives the Bridge Road structure a classification of "Structurally Deficient" with a sufficiency rating of 69.9 out of 100. The Town received a grant of $647,000 to replace the crossing with a single span structure. The project is currently budgeted at $1,300,000.00 for design, ROW/easement acquisition and construction. Staff identified 5 alignment alternatives for the new structure and had Loris and Associates evaluate the alternatives, identify right-of-way (ROW) impacts and develop a preliminary cost estimate of each option. Each alternative analysis was based on providing a required minimum 1' elevation clearance (freeboard) from the water elevation during the 100 yr storm event to the lowest structural element of the bridge. Staff has received a couple informal comments from the recreational community that they would like to see a greater vertical clearance for rafting, kayaking, etc. This is achievable with all 5 alternatives, but has costs and ROW impacts. 9/2/2014 Design/Construction* Alt 1 60' span in current alignment $761,000 Alt 2 80' span in current alignment $1,037,000 Alt 3 80' span curved alignment with new intersection at Bighorn Rd $1,251,000 Alt 4 80' span with new intersection at Bighorn Rd $1,533,000 Alt 5 80' span alignment skewed to follow the creek and reduce curvature of the roadway approach to Bighorn Rd $1,267,000 *Costs do not include relocation of sanitary sewer options Alternatives 3 and 4 realign the intersection of Bridge Road with Bighorn road to more traditional right angle "T" intersection eliminating the current reverse curve approach of Bridge Road. This alignment would free up the area of the existing roadway for an improved Gore Valley Trail connection or potential raft/kayak put in. This area is in an existing 50' wide roadway easement which would require any use other than a road to be negotiated with the property owner. In the time since Loris and Associates completed the alternative alignment analysis, it was discovered that an existing sanitary sewer main crosses Gore Creek between the existing roadway asphalt and culvert structure. Previously it was thought the sanitary sewer main crossed under the creek bed. The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD) has done some preliminary engineering to analyze the feasibility of rerouting the sewer main to tie into an existing main near the East Vail interchange eliminating the creek crossing. Preliminary estimates for the relocation of the sewer main are $605,000.00, not including the cost of obtaining easements. At this time the rerouting of this line is not a priority in the needs of the overall District sanitary system. The ERSWD is willing to contribute approximately $125,000.00 towards relocation of the main (projected 30yr cost of operations/maintenance of existing line) if the Town proceeds with that option. The other option is to replace the sewer main in its existing alignment and encase the main in a steel pipe across the creek under the bridge, similar to Pulis Bridge and Vail Valley Drive bridge. This cost is estimated at approximately $100,000.00 and would be borne by the bridge project. The negatives to this option are the potential for a failure of the pipe over the creek at some point in the future, and a sewer crossing that would be approximately 6 to 7' above the water level in late summer; thus creating a low clearance obstacle (-2'-4') for the recreational community during higher water levels. This low elevation clearance is not inconsistent with many other locations throughout Town, other example bridges in Town that have low clearance from water level to bottom of a sanitary sewer casing pipe include (date measured: 08/13/14): Pulis bridge 7' clearance, Vail Valley Drive bridge 6-6" clearance, Matterhorn bridge 7-6" clearance. In addition to low clearances to sanitary crossings, the golf course bridges at hole 14 and 15 have clearances of 7' and 5-9" respectively from current low water elevation to the bottom of the bridge structures. Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends a bridge alignment that would fall somewhere between the 60' and 80' span length keeping the new structure and roadway approaches in its current alignment and keep the sewer main in its current location with a new casing pipe. This would maintain the current character of the road and bridge, keep the project within current budget, remove the hazardous culvert bridge, and provide similar creek head height clearances for recreational users to many other bridges throughout Town. IV. ATTACHMENTS Loris and Associates Alternative Alignments Summary Letter Bridge Road, Pulis bridge, Vail Valley Drive bridge, Matterhorn bridge photos Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 3 Bridge Road Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 4 Vail Val Drive lookina downstream Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 6 LORIS June 6, 2012 Mr. Chad Salli, P.E. Project Engineer Town of Vail Public Works Department 1309 Elkhorn Drive Vail, CO 81657 Reference: Town of Vail Bridge Rd. Bridge RFP Assistance Findings Summary Letter LORIS Project No. 029-12106 Chad: Loris and Associates, Inc. 2585 Trailridge Drive East Lafayette, CO 80026 T: 303-444-2073 LorisAndAssociates.com In accordance with the RFP, we have evaluated the five (5) options for the Bridge Road Bridge replacement project. This evaluation consisted of the following key points: 1. Perform a conceptual hydraulic evaluation to determine the approximate 100 -year water surface elevation under proposed conditions. The low chord elevation for each option was set to provide one (1) foot of freeboard above this hydraulic event. 2. Develop the various options based on the RFP criteria. The actual alignments and substructure locations were modified from that of the RFP in order to best accomplish the objective of the option under evaluation. These options are as follows: a. Option 1 — 60' Single Span roughly on the existing alignment b. Option 2 — 80' Singe Span roughly on the existing alignment c. Option 3 — 80' Curved alignment within the ROW d. Option 4 — 80' Tangent from Bighorn e. Option 5 — 80' Skewed * The proposed alignment is skewed approximately 10' from the existing to better fit within the right-of-way and improve the roadway alignment. 3. For each option, the south abutment location was set roughly based on a 2:1 slope from the existing edge of channel. The location of the north abutment was then dictated by the structure length under consideration (generally 80'). 4. Bridge typical sections were then developed to provide an economical configuration that minimizes the structure depth and associated right-of-way impacts. Each option utilizes a single span. For Option 3, a single span is possible with straight beams and a variable overhang. 5. A cost estimate was then developed for each option. Unit costs were developed based on the Matterhorn project, CDOT cost data and engineering judgment. Quantities were developed for each option under consideration. Temporary right-of-way impact areas were based on approximate limits of excavation that extend beyond the existing right-of-way. Permanent impacts areas were based on the physical entities that extend beyond the right-of- way. During the course of this exercise, we came to learn that a transportation easement exists for the existing Bridge Road alignment, which drastically reduces the amount of right- of-way take originally believed necessary with alternatives that utilize the existing alignment. 9/2/2014 e �LoRis Town of Vail Bridge Rd. Bridge RFP Assistance June 6, 2012 — Page 2 Please see the attached conceptual Bridge General Layout sheets and conceptual Cost Comparison for your assistance in selecting a preferred alignment. It has become apparent through this exercise that each option does indeed offer its own relative advantage. Options that utilize the existing alignment are more cost effective, but may not be as desirable from a roadway geometric disposition. It should also be noted that the options that align well to Bighorn Road also represent the greatest amounts of fill at the north abutment, which may impede pedestrian access to Gore Creek and be considered visually obtrusive. Each of the options incurs temporary and permanent right-of-way impacts, although the degree of impacts varies considerably. Given the residential location of this bridge, the low ADT versus the high pedestrian volume and existing route of the pedestrian thoroughfare, we believe that the proposed replacement structure match the low profile character of the existing bridge to the best extent practical. In our opinion, the additional expense associated with aligning to Bighorn Road is neither warranted from a roadway geometric perspective nor desirable from the perspective of pedestrians or local residents. We therefore recommend Options 1 be selected for preliminary and final design. The exact bridge length and profile grade will largely depend on a formal hydraulic study. It should be expected that a longer bridge, perhaps that of Option 2 may prove necessary. It should also be noted that while only minor temporary and permanent impacts are associated with the preferred option, it will be possible to further reduce and perhaps eliminate all right-of-way impacts. This would involve further modification of the alignment, the use of steepened slopes and/or temporary and permanent walls. It has been our pleasure to be involved in the selection of the preferred replacement structure type and alignment for complicated yet exciting project. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if we can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, The Office of Loris and Associates, Inc. i Dan Beltzer, P.E. Associate 9/2/2014 L 0 Job: Bridge Road Bridge RFP Assistance Loris Project #029-12106 Conceptual Cost Comparison Loris and Associates, Inc. 2585 Trail Ridge Drive East Lafayette, Colorado 80026 T:303-444-2073 F:303-444-0611 lorisandassociates.com Mastering the Art of Engineering Structures and Infrastructures Notes: 1 In providing opinions of probable construction cost, the Client understands that Loris and Associates has no control over costs of the price of labor, equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of pricing, and that the opinions of probably construction costs provided herein are to be made on the basis of our qualifications and experience. Loris and Associates make no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs. Option 3: 80' Curved Option 4: 80' Tangent from Option 5: 80' Skewed Option 1: 60' Single Span Option 2: 80' Single Span Bighorn ITEM CONTRACT ITEM COMMENTS UNIT Unit QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL Cost 201 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS $5,000.00 10, $5,000.00 10, $5,000.00 10, $5,000.00 1" $5,000.00 10, $5,000.00 202 REMOVAL OF BRIDGE EA $50,000.00 1, $50,000.00 1, $50,000.00 1, $50,000.00 1, $50,000.00 10 $50,000.00 202 REMOVAL OF ASPHALT MAT SY $10.00 739f—$7,388.89 7T9(—$7,388.89 644f $6,444.44 9441 $9,444.44 8411 $8,405.56 203 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION CY $15.00 28 $415.80 205i $3,081.63 178i $2,675.40 188i $2,823.33 157i $2,349.33 203 EMBANKMENT CY $25.00 649' $16,219.31 649,0 $16,219.31 1507' $37,675.79 1308' $32,701.48 525' $13,125.74 206 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CY $20.00 325, $6,505.02 3701 $7,392.47 367, 7,344.19 347, $6,940.94 314, $6,289.42 206 STRUCTURE BACKFILL (CLASS 1) CY $35.00165 $5,777.64 17Lr $6,261.66 178 $6,234.98 175 $6,133.98 165 $5,767.48 210 RESET LIGHT STANDARD EA $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 403 HOT BITUMINIOUS PAVEMENT (3" OVERLAY) 5" HBP TON $120.00 202' $24,287.50 208' $24,921.87 204' $24,468.75 322' $38,606.25 217' $26,009.37 502 STEEL PILING (HP12X74) Assume 20' long piles, 6 piles/abut LF $60.00 2401 $14,400.00 240o'$14,400.00 240 $14,400.00 240; $14,400.00 240o'$14,400.00 502 PILE TIP EA $250.00 12 $3,000.00 12 $3,000.00 12 $3,000.00 12 $3,000.00 1201 $3,000.00 506 RIPRAP (18 INCH) 30" Thick CY $90.00 146 $13,136.90 144 $12,959.88 195 $17,590.40 173 $15,531.36 154 $13,900.89 515 WATERPROOFING (MEMBRANE) SY $20.00 200 $4,000.00 267 $5,333.33 2671 $5,333.33 267 $5,333.33 2671 $5,333.33 518 BRIDGE EXPANSION DEVICE (0-2 INCH) Assume no approach slab, asphalt joint only LF $150.00 6601 $9,900.00 661 $9,900.00 0 661 $9,900.00 661 $9,900.00 661 $9,900.00 601 CONCRETE CLASS B (WALL) Abutments & wingwalls CY $600.00 531 $32,066.67 561 $33,666.67 601 $36,066.67 561 $33,666.67 561 $33,666.67 601 CONCRETE CLASS D (BRIDGE) Deck & Haunch CY $700.00 69 $48,230.00 66 $46,074.26 94 $65,949.07 90 $63,185.37 90 $63,185.37 601 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE COATING Abutments, wingwalls & exterior SF $2.50 2118,1 $5,295.00 26370 $6,591.67 29450, $7,361.67 2677; $6,691.67 26770 $6,691.67 602 REINFORCING STEEL (EPDXY COATED) LB $1.50 23175, $34,762.00 228970 $34,345.72 297440 $44,615.28 28275, $42,412.39 282750 $42,412.39 606 BRIDGE RAIL LF $170.00 120 $20,400.00 160 $27,200.00 160 $27,200.00 160 $27,200.00 160 $27,200.00 606 BRIDGE RAIL TRANSITION TYPE 3G EA $1,600.00 2 $3,200.00 2 $3,200.00 2 $3,200.00 2 $3,200.00 2 $3,200.00 606 BRIDGE RAIL TRANSITION TYPE 3H EA $1,100.00 2' $2,200.00 2' $2,200.00 3' $3,300.00 2' $2,200.00 2' $2,200.00 606 BRIDGE RAIL TRANSITION TYPE 3J EA $2,200.00 , , 1, $2,200.00 1, $2,200.00 , 606 RAIL END ANCHORAGE (FLARED) EA $2,200.00 4 $8,800.00 4 $8,800.00 4 $8,800.00 4 $8,800.00 4 $8,800.00 618 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX (B18X48 SECTION) SF $65.00 11671 $75,842.00 618 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX (B24x78 SECTION) SF $75.00 ' 2546' $190,953.75 ' 2546' $190,953.75 2546' $190,953.75 618 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX (B35x48 SECTION) Straight beams with variable overhang SF $90.00 1 01 1253 $112,809.60 11 01 625 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LS $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 P�l MOBILIZATION LS $25,000.00 11 $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 11 $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 0 SUBTOTAL OF MAJOR ITEMS1 I 1 11 1 $430,826.73 $558,891.10 $541,569.58 $620,324.96 $581,790.97 AESTHETICS xx % of (MAJOR COSTS SUBTOTAL) 10% $ 43,082.67 $ 55,889.11 $ 54,156.96 $ 62,032.50 $ 58,179.10 SWMP & LANDSCAPE xx % of (MAJOR COSTS SUBTOTAL) 8% $ 34,466.14 $ 44,711.29 $ 43,325.57 $ 49,626.00 $ 46,543.28 MOT ITEMS xx % of (MAJOR COSTS SUBTOTAL) 8% $ 34,466.14 $ 44,711.29 $ 43,325.57 $ 49,626.00 $ 46,543.28 F/A ITEMS xx % of (MAJOR COSTS SUBTOTAL) 12% $ 51,699.21 $ 67,066.93 $ 64,988.35 $ 74,439.00 $ 69,814.92 SUBTOTAL OF CONSTRUCTION $594,540.88 $771,269.72 $747,366.01 $856,048.45 $802,871.54 ROW - TEMPORARY IMPACTS SF $100.00 196 $19,600.00 151 $15,100.00 102 $10,200.00 108 $10,800.00 294 $29,400.00 ROW - PERMANENT IMPACTS SF $200.00 139 $27,800.00 479 $95,800.00 1720 $344,000.00 2471 $494,200.00 1367 $273,400.00 PROJECT ENGINEERING xx % of (CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL) 20% $ 118,908.18 $ 154,253.94 $ 149,473.20 $ 171,209.69 $ 160,574.31 TOTAL $760,849.06 I $1,036,423.66 $1,251,039.22 1 $1,532,258.14 $1,266,245.85 9/2/2014 33'-0" 0/0 BRIDGE -6" S-0" 24'-0" S-0" V-13' SHDR SHDR BRIDGE RAIL TYPE 1D (SPECIAL)* 1V3" HBP OVER WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE* 8" CONCRETE DECK* / I SO 2'-6" (5) B18x48 ® 7'-0" C/C = 28'-0" 60' SPAN / CROSS SECTION C G S SCALE: %" = V-0" / / / IF APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF 60'-07 B ABUT. TO B/F ABUT - / �DISTURBANCE 747 ' , ; APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF \ I j / STRUCTURE EXCAVATION* I� � I 1+00 I 2+Q0 BRIDGE R AD \ / � I BRIDGE PLAN ,'�----—------ --- -APPROXIMATE LIM OF / STRUCTURE E NATION* CONCEPTIIAL i \ / NOT FOR CONSTBIA." O y / Hno /whs / 811 eFor oo dig.. / I / / I' , TRANSITION TYPE SSG & END ANCHORAGE TYPE 31` (TYP.)* 10 20 I / SCALE: 1 " = 20' LOW CHORD EL. 8365.00* 100 -YR PRESUMPTIVE `n _ 8370 WSEL 8364.00* 8 57 F%1STIN0- — — — — 837 — — — 0.0% 5.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 8360 — — — _ — / 836 INTEGRAL STUB ABUTMENT* APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF * = TYPICAL OF ALL OPTIONS AND STRUCTURE EXCAVATION* �HP PILING* ONLY CALLED OUT ON OPTION 1 8350 BRIDGE ® q 835 0 10 20 RIPRAP (18 -INCH)* SCALE: 1" = 20' 8340 834 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 Print Date: Jun 05, 2012 Sheet RevisionsAs Constructed BRIDGE STREET BRIDGE Project No. Code GENERAL LAYOUT — OPTION 1 File Name: Date: Comments Init. LA andAssocWA,�nt Colorado Department of Transportation Horiz. Scale: Vert. Scale: As Noted � � p° No Revisions: 60 ROUGHLY ON EX. ALIGNMENT 714 &WW M Unit Information Unit Leader Initials �6T"Hdped' 8002` � OTs CO ,1B1 Designer: DB 'p�1tlo7�8 � l).ize�sae� Revised: 9 Structure * O ,P.a,w., or .o. FAK 70 •^'M'�•�n Region •3 KEP/DM Detailer: BAO Numbers O Void:Sheet Subset: - Subset Sheets: _ Sheet Number 3 E s v n 33'-0" 0/0 BRIDGE V-6" 3'-0" 24'-0" 3'-0" 1'-6' SHDR SHDR E:J- 5'-6" 4 835x48 @ 8'-6" C C = 25'-6" MAX 80' SPAN VARIABLE OVERHANG MIN i 8380 CROSS SECTION 0 4 8 SCALE: t%" = 1'-0" i 8370 0.0% 8360 8350 I � I � \ i f I I I----------------------i------ I � I I I I ------------ IJ----�-- I I I / �� — g�F AgOT TO BIF r; RECONSTRUCT OLD Bf IDGE OAD TO 11 MAINTAIN BIKE PATH QR REALIGN / / BIKE PATH ONTO BIGHORN OAD I 5+00 I I i l II----------- 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 \ - ND CHORALE TYPE 3K ENI ANCHORAG E 13 � TYPE J i BRIDGE SECTI INI \ \ \ APPROX ROADWAY GRADIN LI IT (3:1 II 10 20 SCALE: 1" = 20' BRIDGE @ 0 10 20 SCALE: 1" = 20' CONCEPTUAL NOT FOR CONSTR[JI we MODIFY EXISTING GUARDRAIL Q469. Know what's 116101H. C31 before von dig. v 0 N N 8380 rn 8370 8360 8350 8340 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18340 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+20 5+40 5+60 5+80 Print Date: Jun 05, 2012BRIDGE � O 0 O LOdS2fIf dASSCC12t2S,Inc.lOC, "HtlprDM ado8D °' ,enwmnaoox sos.aeaxo� 'hen --7 oolorado Trans nation ortment PO�p 774 OTrd CO 8ae1wes .<a•, -.,o, ." . rar:ism) asa-zaae Region 3 KEP/DM z STREET BRIDGE GENERAL LAYOUT — OPTION 3 $0 CURVED WITHIN. EX. ROW Project No. Code 5+69 O Comments Init. No Revisions: Horiz. Scale: Vert. Scale: As Noted MODIFY EXISTING GUARDRAIL Q469. Know what's 116101H. C31 before von dig. v 0 N N 8380 rn 8370 8360 8350 8340 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18340 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+20 5+40 5+60 5+80 Print Date: Jun 05, 2012BRIDGE � O 0 Sheet Revisions LOdS2fIf dASSCC12t2S,Inc.lOC, "HtlprDM ado8D °' ,enwmnaoox sos.aeaxo� 'hen . TM OFl oolorado Trans nation ortment PO�p 774 OTrd CO 8ae1wes .<a•, -.,o, ." . rar:ism) asa-zaae Region 3 KEP/DM As Constructed STREET BRIDGE GENERAL LAYOUT — OPTION 3 $0 CURVED WITHIN. EX. ROW Project No. Code File Name:Date: Comments Init. No Revisions: Horiz. Scale: Vert. Scale: As Noted Unit Information Unit Leader Initials Revised: Designer: DB Structure Numbers Detailer: BAO Void: Sheet Number 3 Sheet Subset: - Subset Sheets: _ 3 E s v 3 E v d rnwH of vn' �Ii1 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Vail Village Character Area Preservation. The purpose of this work session to request direction on approaches to address five (5) identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan. The public, Planning and Environmental Commission, staff, and consultant have reviewed the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations to address the adopted problem statement. The Vail Town Council will be given a presentation highlighting the public process and resulting recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission in pursuing the direction provided by Vail Town Council in the adopted problem statement. As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur to the physical features of Vail Village, are the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. PRESENTER(S): Warren Campbell, Community Development Department and Tom Braun, Braun and Associates ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: The Vail Town Council shall adopt, adopt with modifications, or reject the proposed recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Does the Vail Town Council support the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission to address Landmarks, Boundaries of the Urban Design Guide Plan, Non -conforming properties and redevelopment, Architectural Character, and Specific Design Elements of the Urban Design Guide Plan? If yes, Should Town staff pursue a public process with the community to discuss the implementation and adoption of amendments to the regulatory tools used to carry out the Town's development objectives for Vail Village? BACKGROUND: On July 28, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously forwarded a recommendation of approval to proceed forward with the Vail Village Character Area Preservation initiative to examine and implement approaches to address the identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the application and implementation Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Vail Town Council adopts the recommendations to proceed forward with an effort to address identified elements to ensure the special�p)?kf-4cter of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the TC TC Power point 9/2/2014 TOWN OF 0) VAIL 1 Memorandum TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: September 2, 2014 SUBJECT: A work session to request direction on approaches to address the five identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan. Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Braun Associates, Inc. Planner: Warren Campbell I. SUMMARY The purpose of this work session to request direction affirmation on approaches to address five (5) identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan. The public, Planning and Environmental Commission, staff, and consultant have reviewed the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations to address the adopted problem statement. The following problem statement was adopted by the Vail Town Council and has guided the process, discussion and outcomes. As buildings in the Village continue to redevelop or as other changes occur to the physical features of Vail Village, are the Town's current regulations, design standards and guidelines sufficient to ensure that the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced. Five (5) elements have been identified through the public process with the community and the Planning and Environmental Commission as needing to be addressed. Those elements are as follows: o Public places and spaces o Pedestrian streets and corridors o Iconic features • Application boundaries of the Urban Design Guide Plan o Possible expansion 9/2/2014 o Clarification of when a property is within the boundaries Non -conforming properties and redevelopment potential o Height in excess of permitted o Dwelling units and GRFA in excess of permitted o Site coverage in excess of permitted o Incentive to redevelop when currently in excess of permitted Architectural Character o Maintaining a sense of a Vail as a special/identifiable place o Allowing for variety o Core verses outlining areas Specific Design Elements of the Urban Design Guide Plan o Retail store fronts o Building height o Sun/shade of outdoor spaces o Importance of outdoor dining decks/patios Staff has attached a power point presentation which discusses possible solutions to address these elements (Attachment A). Staff has provided hyperlinks to the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan under the attachments section of this memorandum for review (Attachments B and C). II. ACTION REQUEST OF COUNCIL The Vail Town Council shall adopt, adopt with modifications, or reject the proposed recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Does the Vail Town Council support the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission to address Landmarks, Boundaries of the Urban Design Guide Plan, Non -conforming properties and Redevelopment, Architectural Character, and Specific Design Elements of the Urban Design Guide Plan? If yes, Should Town staff pursue a public process with the community to discuss the implementation and adoption of amendments to the regulatory tools used to carry out the Town's development objectives for Vail Village? III. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2009, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolution No. 23, Series of 2008, a resolution that provided for certain updates to the Vail Village Master Plan. One of the more significant updates to the plan was the addition of an objective recognizing the "historic" importance of architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features with the goal of preserving the existing character of Vail Village. In addition, one new policy statement was added to the plan to further the newly stated objective. The policy Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 2 statement was developed to guide the Town's decision-making in achieving each of the stated objectives, whether it be through the review of private sector development proposals or in implementing capital improvement projects. Finally, action steps were suggested as immediate follow-up actions necessary to implement the goals of this Plan. To that end, the Vail Village Master Plan was updated to include the following language: GOAL #1 ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY, REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY. 1.4 Objective: (in part) Recognize the "historic" importance of the architecture, structures, landmarks, plazas and features in preserving the character of Vail Village. 1.4.1 Policy: The historical importance of other similar features shall development review process. structures, landmarks, plazas and e taken into consideration in the 1.4.2 Policy: The town should grant flexibility in the interpretation and implementation of its regulations and design guidelines to help protect and maintain the existing character of Vail Village. 1.4.3 Policy: Identification of "historic" importance shall not be used as the sole means of preventing or prohibiting development in Vail Village. GOAL #1 Action Steps: (in part) 6. Compile a list and develop a map identifying the location of potential structures, landmarks, plazas and other similar features that may be of historical importance. On October 18, 2011 the Vail Town Council discussed Vail Village Historic Preservation and Landmark Designation. As a part of the discussion information was provided on historic preservation, preservation programs, creation of historic districts, common property owner concerns regarding historic designation, possible benefits of a historic district, etc. At the public hearing the Vail town Council was asked to respond to the following question: Should Town staff pursue a public process with the community to discuss preserving and protecting historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 3 and implementing any regulatory tools that may be necessary to carry out the Town's development objectives? The Vail Town Council directed staff to pursue an initiative to preserve and protect historic structures and landmarks in Vail Village. On November 20, 2012 the Vail Town Council was introduced to the Vail Village Character Study that staff and Tom Braun of Braun and Associates was beginning. At the hearing The Vail Town Council was asked to affirm "The Question at Hand" (question provide under summary section of this memorandum). The Vail Town Council affirmed the direction that the project would take and the question it would seek to answer. On February 7, 2013 several focus group sessions were conducted to obtain input and feedback on the initiative. Staff and the consultant have placed the comments heard from the focus groups into the following categories: Near Unanimous Consensus The character of the Village is important to Vail's identity, it sets Vail apart, makes Vail unique. It is important to maintain this, to hold onto, reinforce the original vision for the Village. The Village is great, by and large the regulations/guidelines we have in place are working, with only a very few exceptions the new buildings have added/strengthened/reinforced the Village's character The Village core is distinct from the rest of the Village, "character" is strongest in this area. Some variation to the literal interpretation of the "Swiss Alpine village" is OK, not all buildings will be perfect and not all buildings need to be, an anomaly here and there is OK. With regard to buildings, maintaining existing scale of the Village core is critically. There is no one single building in the Village that would rise to "landmark status" rather it is the scale of buildings, the views, the plazas and public spaces, the pedestrian flow, dining decks are what set the Village apart. Iconic improvements — Covered Bridge. The Clock Tower (albeit no clear consensus as to whether the existing clock tower is worthy of preservation or whether having a clock tower in this location is important) Guidelines may need a refinement here or there, but no major overhaul of system is needed. General sense of what is most important — Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 4 1. Building scale 2. Public spaces/pedestrian flow/vitality and street life 3. Quality of design/construction/materials 4. Architecture Widely Held Consensus Some modest degree of additional height in Core might be acceptable (to address floor to ceiling "expectations" of guests) Greater building scale is acceptable outside of the Core (within reason) Design controls (UDGP) to further reinforce the Village's establish character should be expanded to area outside of the Core (East Village, Meadow Drive) Street life, vitality, activity ... specifically outdoor dining decks are critical to the character of the Village. Some Degree of Consensus The most important change needed to design guidelines for the Village is to allow for/encourage the use of high quality materials (code talk for materials other than stucco). Guidelines need to encourage creativity/broader expression (while still respecting "alpine" character) More flexibility is needed with regard to window treatments (don't mandate divided panes, allow for larger glass). Need to resolve conflict in Guidelines that require landscaping that blocks visibility of store fronts. Other Pertinent Comments When do you stop using increased levels of development as an incentive for redevelopment? The physical area of "the Village" is considered to extend from Vail Road to Vail Valley Drive, maybe to Manor Vail. Water is very important — both Gore Creek and the water features in the Village. Every site/building is unique, has its own characteristics/considerations that will influence review process. Mechanical — needs to be requirement to screen. What to do with non -conforming buildings — how will they ever have motivation to re -develop? Lodge at Vail, Sitzmark, etc. Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 5 On February 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission was introduced to the project and the desired outcomes upon completion. On March 11, 2013, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a work session to begin discussion on elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations which may need to be reexamined to address the project's problem statement. The five following topical areas of the Vail Village Master Plan and Vail Village Urban Design Guide were discussed. The topical areas were developed through the focus group participation, staff's, and consultant's experience and observations. The five topics area were as follows: Architectural Character — Vail Village was "originally conceived as a mountain resort in the pattern of a quaint European alpine Village. Do the Town's guidelines further this goal, what types of architectural expression, use of materials, etc. may be appropriate while still holding true to this vision? • The Urban Design Guide Plan and Design and Design Considerations —Where do these guidelines currently apply, where should they apply? Future re -development potential of properties that currently exceed allowable height, GRFA, etc. — A number of properties in VV that currently exceed zoning standards are considered potential candidates for redevelopment. Historically, properties in Vail have increased in size when re -developed. How can Town encourage re -development while at same time maintain the scale of buildings in the Village? • Landmark Designation — Are there improvements in the Village that warrant designation of "landmark" status? • Specific Elements of Urban Desian Guide Plan and Desian Considerations — Eleven specific elements of the UDGP have been identified that may warrant refinement/clarification. On April 1, 2014, the Vail Town Council received and update on the progress of the project and directed staff to move forward and complete Phase 1 of the project. On May 12, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing to revisit the project and bring new members up to the current level of knowledge. There was a discussion regarding the selected comparable communities and the fact that they were not ski communities. It was explained why the comparable communities were selected. Staff was specifically asked to speak with Carmel, California to discuss their tools to maintain character, bulk, and mass in the commercial core. A discussion with the planning director revealed that the primary factor limiting control development and redevelopment was water supply. There is no additional water resource so no land use can become more intense. Zoning regulations and a historic building inventory/registry also provide for significant restriction and review. Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 6 On July 28, 2014, the Planning and Environmental Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval on specific approaches to address the five (5) elements identified as needing to be addressed. IV. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the Vail Town Council adopts the recommendations to proceed forward with an effort to address five (5) identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the Vail Village Master Plan as an outcome of the Vail Village Character Area Preservation initiative. Should the Vail Town Council choose to proceed with the recommendations to continue forward with the examination and implementation of potential amendments to the Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends the following motion: "The Vail Town Council adopts the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission to proceed forward with the Vail Village Character Area Preservation initiative to examine and implement approaches to address the five (5) identified elements to ensure the special character of Vail Village is not just maintained but also enhanced through the application and implementation Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, and the Vail Village Design Considerations." V. ATTACHMENTS A. Town Council Power Point Presentation dated September 2, 2014 B. Vail Village Master Plan C. Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan Town of Vail 9/2/2014 Page 7 Today's Discussion Purpose of Meeting Development Review Process/Existing Tools Recommended Topics for Further Study Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 ` _,O, ;` .� TOWN OF UAIt AND— WC •,+ `r .. Cl M Ilk h `+ �,., Y� __ 1 v'r� ail •`,� ` � �-• Existing Tools Vail Village Master Plan �m% ACTION PLAN �.'Al VILLAGE PLAN .:,a:: VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CR�L� A A Vail Village Character Study RALI N TC Work Session #4 .,,IMI 1.1�1 TOWN OF mIi Zoning Vail V. Characte Existinj FSA colon Existing Tools ZON E DIS'MCM Public Acewnodation Special Development District F �r Vail Village Character Study RALI N TC Work Session #4 '.,,,, TOWN OF VAIs Existing Tools Urban Design Guide Plan 1. The Guide Plan 2. Design Considerations • Urban Design Considerations • Architectural and Landscape Design Considerations Vail V aiara[te UDGP' va4 Cabe Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 "171 .-., TOWN OF mu Existing Tools Urban Design Guide Plan Part 1 -The Guide Plan i ryr! Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 "171 1 lti TOWN OF UAIt KEY TO THE TO GUIDE PLAN: GRAPHICSYMBOLS E.j Gore Creek Pedestrian Path Featurearea-p—onttreatment E2All -Ilk - Open access (diredim daowl I M I ( 1 ' Fnml point odsting a prgrosed A,—,,,k-,Ll mtlod access, t_ne [laub d g, passing) Infill expanslan opp.,t n�AY -wilhin established wnslawn AontoRruck L' led access San+ica 8 remde Oeli-ery parking La14-11, fratn-1, deciduwslwnifemus tares � SeparaPed pedestrian way Annual wlw plad'ng color anent to rctiMorce movement l�: T Key to site-spedfc cansideretims j Shuttle bus we two line {eachdRedim) FxfAirtg caMrguralion �r ,y Shutlle bus rode me Iwo ��� 1 l --deimprovemenrarecammended i ryr! Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 "171 1 lti TOWN OF UAIt Existing Tools Urban Design Guide Plan Part 1 - The Guide Plan Vail Village Character Study PB BALI N TC Work Session #4 "171 TOWN OF mIi Existing Tools Urban Design Guide Plan Part 2 - Urban Design Considerations Pedestrian ization Vehicle Penetration Streetscape Framework Street Enclosure Street Edge Building Height Views and Focal Points Service and Delivery Sun/Shade Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 i�Ll N 0:fie. � , 4 Ai 1 1. 11, TOWN OF UAIt Existing Tools Urban Design Guide Plan Part 2 - Architectural and Landscape Considerations Roofs form/pitch/overhangs/composition/stepped/materials/construction Facades materials/color/transparency/windows/doors/trim Balconies color/size/mass/materials Decks and Patios Balconies Accent Elements Landscape Elements Plant materials/paving/retaining walls/lighting/signage Services Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RALI N Recommended Topics for Further Study • Where UDGP Applies • Landmarks • Non -conforming Properties/Redevelopment Potential • Architectural Character • Specific Elements of UDGP Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 i�Ll N 0:fie. � , 4 Ai 1 1. 11, TOWN OF UAIt Where UDGP AwAes What we heard ...... • The built environment of the Village is one of Vail's most important, most distinguishing characteristics. • The UDGP has been a very effective tool. TOWN OF VAIL V� OnraeEzr Study Ama v.R cw..dc- f11/W1[J osr.an Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 "l�LI � TOWN OF VAIL Vail V Characte UDGPI Vail, C0101 Where UDGP Applies �.131ZR411�t Eh—bm ,,2012 Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 ".,,, TOWN OF mIi Where UDGP Applies Goal — Expand the physical area of Vail Village where the UDGP will apply. Next Steps • Identify the implications of expanding the applicability of UDGP • Define potential UDGP "sub -areas" in the Village Recommended Approach • Adopt overlay map defining applicable the area where UDGP is • Modify UDGP as necessary to clarify applicability within specific areas of the Village Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs iAU N Landmarks What we heard .... • Few specific buildings warrant "landmark status" • Covered Bridge and a landmark/tower feature at Gorsuch Building are important • No real interest in "landmark designation" program • Public spaces/plazas and pedestrian corridors are very important, these must be maintained/protected F -I Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 "1711., TOWN OF UAIt Pedestrian Circulation Landmarks �. �.�� iwlSuway fd..nw P�Nnw Q1. sp— jjjl y f ka' i 47earicx. Remi Sludv Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs , 3RAL1 N Landmarks Places and Spaces vad) v cha-k ,A - Vail Village Character Study AoqpH3 BALI N TC Work Session #4 "'17, TOWN OF V41L Landmarks Pedestrian Circulation/Places and Spaces E Vail Village Character Area Study Town owned Land VaiL Colorado �l;ltflllfV luly,2ala ■ Town Owned Land Town [tight -Of -Way ;' ggwa Primary Pe ies'trian Pathl&C t --� SecondaryPedesirianCorridor Plazas 1 Public Spaces �'' Features Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 "171 TOWN OF UAIt Landmarks Pedestrian Circulation/Places and Spaces Goal — Preserve key pedestrian corridors and plazas throughout Vail Village. Next Ste p • Complete comprehensive inventory of existing corridors/plazas in Vail Village • Research ownership and easements of existing corridors/plazas • Identify potential areas for new corridors/plazas Recommended Approach • Amend the UDGP to address the preservation of existing corridors/plazas and to identify the potential for new corridors/plazas • Where deemed necessary, work with land owners on easements to protect improvements on private lands • Implement a no net loss of development potential" in cases of public improvements on private lands • Evaluate measures to preserve improvements on public improvements — i.e. deed restrictions, perpetual easements, zoning (i.e. "Designated Open Space) 9/2/2014 Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 o%VP-B`LI 0 TOWN OF UAIt LP , s _ ', mo b •i vow � ¢ a Ai r ph F . � r +�I 1 4 ly�•.� � }j � � 9f, p c , Landmarks Buildings/Structures Landmark/Historic Preservation Programs Sante Fe, New Mexico Historic Districts (zoning overlay district) Park City, Utah Guidelines for Historic Districts and Historic Sites Santa Barbara, California Urban Design Guidelines for City Grid EI Pueblo Viejo Landmark District Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 i�Ll N :fie. 0, 4 A i 1 1. 11' TOWN OF UAIt Landmarks Buildings/Structures Sante Fe, New Mexico Adopted in 1957, "to preserve and protect the character of Santa Fe's historic architecture and the integrity of its archaeological resources . . . ." • Five different historic districts cover nearly 20 percent of town. • Buildings classified as "significant", "contributing", "non-contributing" or "landmark status". • Code distinguishes between "old Sante Fe style" and "recent Sante Fe style". • Proposed modifications to existing buildings that would cause it to lose it's historic status "shall be denied". • Additions to primary facades are not permitted to "significant" or "landmark" buildings. • Limitations on % of additional SF and building height additions to existing buildings, cannot add floors to "significant" or "landmark" buildings. • Porches cannot be enclosed. • Non -conforming buildings can only be added to/modified unless brought into "degree of conformity" as determined by Board. • Regulations are predominantly "standards", not "guidelines". • The word "shall" is used extens((i��ve^^ly Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 i�Ll N :fie. 0, 4 A i 1 1. 11, TOWN OF UAIt Landmarks Buildings/Structures Park City, Utah Adopted in 2009, Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and Historic Sites are intended to meet the needs of various interests in the community by providing guidance in determining suitability and compatibility of proposed projects .... • 400 sites are identified on City's list of historic resources. Six historic districts (two are National Register Historic Districts). • "Landmark sites" (>50 years old, retain historic integrity, exemplify architectural styles of Park City's past) and "historic sites" (>50 years old, retain essential historic form, contribute to historic character and/or convey important info about community). • Sites cannot be demolished w/o "rigorous demolition permit approval process" • Four treatments for historic sites — Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration and Re- construction (re -construction is "rarely recommended"). • Explicit guidelines (site, landscape, architectural) for how landmark and historic sites are reviewed and for new construction in historic districts. • Extensive use of word "should" and "encouraged". Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RALI N Landmarks Buildings/Structures Santa Barbara, California Adopted EI Pueblo Viejo Landmark District in 1960, adopted Urban Design Guidelines for the "City Grid" in 1999. • Historic Landmarks Commission uses landmark guidelines for review of applications within landmark district and for landmark structures, separate design review board uses urban design guidelines for all other projects • "Compatibility" with adjacent properties and surrounding area is a requisite for approval of new development. • Guidelines articulates numerous design elements used in determining "compatibility" • Urban design guidelines address many of same topics as Vail's UDGP — street edge, pedestrian movement, outdoor spaces, automobiles and transit. • Landmark guidelines address more explicitly architectural/building elements. • Guidelines utilize "should", "encourage", "consider" far more than "shall", but at same time Guidelines provide significant explanation of community expectations. Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RALI N Landmarks Buildings/Structures Goal — Preserve key buildings and structures within the Village. Next Steps Identify other buildings, features, structures Vail Village that may warrant preservation (i.e. Vail Interfaith Chapel) Recommended Approach • Amend UDGP to address Clock Tower, Covered Bridge and if applicable other buildings/features in Village • Evaluate feasibility and potential benefits of town policy to facilitate/assist with private initiated preservation efforts Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RALI N NonmConformin What we heard ..... Properties/Redevelopment • Scale of buildings in core of Village is "right" • Building scale is the key defining feature of the Village • Recent re -developments have by and large been positive Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 1 TOWN OF VAIs ILI , 3ML1 N NonmConformina ProDerties/RedeveloDment What we heard . • More buildings are in need of up- grade • Need to provide incentives for re- development and upgrading of property • 33740' is considered restrictive, 60%/40% split is questioned. x Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RAL1 N NonmConformin Properties/Redevelopment Goal — Preserve the scale of buildings in the Village Core while providing some flexibility for the re -development of existing non -conforming buildings. Next Step • Complete inventory of existing non -conforming buildings in CCI. • Evaluate implications of 60/40 building height percentage and 33740' building height limit in CCI. Recommended Approach • Prohibit the use of SDD's to exceed allowable height limits within CCI Zone District • Adopt more stringent building height variance criteria in CCI Zone District • Amend zoning to allow existing non -conforming buildings in CCI to re- build to non -conforming level if proposed design provides improved conditions/compliance with UDGP considerations • Potentially address 60/40 % and 33'/40' height limit in CCI Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 i�Ll N :fie. 0, 4 A i 1 1. 11, TOWN OF UAIt Architectural Character What we heard ..... • Architectural character is defining aspect of Vail's identity, it sets Vail Village apart from other places • The "Swiss Alpine Village" creates a strong, identifiable sense of place • It is very important to maintain this character, to reinforce original vision for Village "Village character" is strongest in the Village Core (CCI) - 7" -- Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs iAU N Architectural Character What we heard ...... • Not every building will be "perfect not every building should be "perfect" Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 '_17I 1 TOWN OF UAIL Architectural Character What we heard ...... • Variety in buildings can be "OK" • Some anomalies are "OK" 9112�2e44 Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 �..,, TOWN OF VAIs Architectural Character Contradictions in what we heard - "strengthen Village character" . . . . but some variety is "OK" Begs the questions - • When do you have so many anomalies .... they are no longer anomalies?? • How much variety is the right amount of variety? • Where is variety "OK"? • Variety to what degree? • How do you legislate this? Role of guidelines in the review process (narrative, graphics, prescriptive vs. qualitative guidelines) Role of review boards in the review process (composition of boards, interpretation of guidelines) Review process in Village — it won't always be perfect, but it has been effective Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIt RALI 'N Architectural Character What do Design Considerations of the UDGP says about architecture ..... "Vail was originally conceived as a mountain resort in the pattern of a quaint European alpine village. It remains fairly faithful to that image today" "These Design Considerations, and the Urban Design Plan as a whole, are intended to guide growth and change in ways that will enhance and preserve the essential qualities of Vail Village. This character, while inspired to a degree by European models, has evolved into a distinctly local interpretation. Any standards, in the end, must be based upon Vail's own unique characteristics, and potential now. "To preserve this character, care must be taken to avoid both new architectural prototypes, and historical ones, local or foreign, which do not share the same design vocabulary. These Design Considerations are a recognition that there is a distinctive design character to the Village and that this character is important to preserve". 9112 i 9 ^ ^ Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 i�Ll N 0:fie. � , 4 Ai 1 1. 11, TOWN OF UAIt Architectural Character Elements of the UDGP intended to further the desired architectural and landscape character of Vail Village: Roofs form/pitch/overhangs/composition/stepped/materials/construction Facades materials/color/transparency/windows/doors/trim Balconies color/size/mass/materials Decks and Patios 0•- Accent Elements Landscape Elements Plant materials/paving/retaining walls/lighting/signage Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 Services TOWN OF VAIs RALI N Architectural Character Goal — Clarify the overall design goals for Vail Village in order to provide the PEC and DRB with the tools needed for an effective review process. Recommended Approach Amend the UDGP Design Considerations to: • Provide more clarity regarding the overall design goals for Vail Village . . ... what we want the Village to be, what we want to avoid. • Address variety in architectural character — how not all buildings must look alike, but should share a common design vocabulary. • Address "compatibility". • Identify the design features (i.e. roof forms, building materials, details, etc.), deemed critical to furthering Vail's desired design character. • Expand on specific Design Considerations as may be necessary. Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RALI N Specific Design Considerations of UDGP Specific design considerations to be evaluated as identified from community input, by PEC and by staff: Retail Storefronts Expansions Transparency/Windows Landscaping Sun/Shade Dining Decks/Patios Rooftop Mechanical Public Plazas/Outdoor Spaces "Housekeeping" Items Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 i�Ll N 0:fie. � , 4 Ai 1 1. 11, TOWN OF UAIt St)ecific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts • Retail Expansions 9/2/2014 Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs Recommended Approach Inventory the Village to identify areas where retail expansion may be appropriate. Update the Guide Plan as necessary. iAU N St)ecific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts • Windows I - I 4 Recommended Approach Amend UDGP to clarify design intent regarding scale of windows, sub- division of windows, window patterns, window frames, details, etc. Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs AIW-B RALI N St)ecific Elements of UDGP Retail/Storefronts • Landscaping Recommended Approach Better articulate expectations for landscape design. Find balance between potentially competing goals - landscaping and visibility to retail storefronts. Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 r Af f TOWN OF VAIs , 3RAL1 N Specific Elements of UDGP Outdoor Spaces • Sun/shade Recommended Approach Better define expectations for sun/shade, re: clarify meaning of "substantially increase", expectations for winter months, role of "sun pockets", sun/shade impact on public spaces, etc. Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RALI N St)ecific Elements of UDGP Outdoor Spaces • Dining decks/patios Recommended Approach Expand language to address the preservation of dining decks and patios (may occur in Guide Plan section). Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs , 3RAL1 N Specific Elements of UDGP Outdoor Spaces • Public Plazas Recommended Approach The UDGP goes to great lengths to address the design of private improvements. Introduce a new section of UDGP that addresses how private development should respond to public plazas. This could also be addressed in Guide Plan section. Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 `'>, ;'L� TOWN OF UAIt Specific Elements of UDGP Rooftop Mechanical Recommended Approach - UDGP is silent to rooftop mechanical. Incorporate design considerations that address mechanical equipment. Below is from the Lionshead Re -development Master Plan: Miscellaneous Equipment All miscellaneous rooftop equipment, including roof vents, antennas and satellite dishes, shall be painted to blend with the roofs to which they relate. Major pieces of equipment on commercial buildings shall be strategically located to conceal them from view, or hidden in cupolas or other structures—exposed equipment is not permitted. All flashings shall be copper or painted metal to match those found on exterior walls. The intent of these provisions is to present a well - blended roofscape throughout the community, as seen from the public spaces as well as from the mountain. Vail Village Character Study TC Work Session #4 TOWN OF VAIs RALI N St)ecific Elements of UDGP Housekeeping Items Recommended Approach - • Better define role of PEC and DRB • Clarify methodology for calculating building height • Condition of UDGP Sub -area Narrative and Maps r— cll_� Vail Village Character Study RALE N TC Work Session #4 �.,,, 1.1�, TOWN OF UAIL Next Steps PEC recommendations for how to proceed Update to Town Council, confirm direction Define Phase II Scope of Work/Project Schedule Initiate Phase II Vail Village Character Study BALI N TC Work Session #4 "1711., ,1.1�1 TOWN OF UAIt ,. 11� or Old L e - yy "1 k.3.� I .: _ � :. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Information Update: 1) June Vail Business Review 2nd Quarter 2) July Sales Tax Memorandum 3) Revenue Highlights ATTACHMENTS: June Vail Business Review 2nd Quarter July Sales Tax Memorandum Revenue Highlights 9/2/2014 rowH Of Mit: TOWN OF VAIL' 75 South Frontage Road west Finance Department Vail, Colorado 81857 970.479.2100 vailgov.com 970.479.2248 fax Vail Business Review June 2014 August 19, 2014 The June Vail Business Review breaks down the four percent sales tax collected for June and year to date through second quarter. Overall June sales tax increased 12.1 % with Retail increasing 8.6%, Lodging increased 23.4%, Food and Beverage increased 8.7% and Utilities/Other (which is mainly utilities but also includes taxable services and rentals) increased 9.1 %. The Out of Town category continues to be greatly affected by construction, interior design firms and furniture stores delivering in to Vail. Excluding the Out of Town category sales tax for the month of June was up 11.9%. Year to date through second quarter resulted in an 8.2% increase overall with Retail increasing 7.3%, Lodging increased 11.2%, Food and Beverage increased 6.4% and Utilities/Other increased 3.1 %. Excluding the Out of Town category, sales tax for the first quarter is up 8.1 %. Town of Vail sales tax forms, the Vail Business Review and the sales tax worksheet are available on the internet at www.vailgov.com. You can subscribe to have the Vail Business Review and the sales tax worksheet e-mailed to you automatically from www.vailaov.com. Please remember when reading the Vail Business Review that it is produced from sales tax collections, as opposed to actual gross sales. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (970) 479-2125 or Judy Camp at (970) 479-2119. Sincerely, LA Sally Lorton Sales Tax Administrator 9/2/2014 June Cq'TOWN OF VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW RI TO OF VAIL Sales Tax Newsletter June 2014 Sales Tax 8/15/2014 11:23:14 AM 192014 Page 1 of 2 June 2013 Collections June 2014 Collections June % Change VAIL VILLAGE Retail 110,130 131,506 19.41 % Lodging 105,776 136,052 28.62% F & B 201,975 214,804 6.35% Other 6,567 3,049 -53.56% Total 424,447 485,411 14.36% LIONSHEAD Retail 35,050 36,874 5.20% Lodging 71,530 92,575 29.42% F & B 60,223 69,331 15.13% Other 4,928 4,136 -16.06% Total 171,730 202,916 18.16% CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIL/SANDSTONE/WEST VAIL Retail 124,263 122,882 -1.11 % Lodging 56,242 59,000 4.90% F & B 57,333 61,050 6.48% Other 4,231 6,688 58.07% Total 242,069 249,620 3.12% OUT OF TOWN Retail 77,441 85,358 10.22% Lodging 3,594 4,903 36.44% F & B 406 2,660 554.47% Utilities & Other 102,780 115,400 12.28% Total 184,221 208,322 13.08% 8/15/2014 11:23:14 AM 192014 Page 1 of 2 June TOWN OF VA it TOWN OF VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW Sales Tax Newsletter June 2014 Sales Tax TOTAL 8/15/2014 11:23:14 AM er7Aj72 jcT4/er Page 2 of 2 June June June 2013 2014 % Collections Collections Change Retail 346,883 376,620 8.57% Lodging And Property Mgmt 237,142 292,530 23.36% Food and Beverage 319,937 347,845 8.72% Other 118,506 129,274 9.09% Total 1,022,468 1,146,268 12.11 % RETAIL SUMMARY June June June 2013 2014 % Collections Collections Change RETAIL -FOOD 97,601 95,989 -1.65% RETAIL -LIQUOR 28,777 30,820 7.10% RETAIL -APPAREL 56,824 65,647 15.53% RETAIL -SPORT 53,344 60,367 13.17% RETAIL -JEWELRY 12,902 16,709 29.50% RETAIL -GIFT 3,124 3,642 16.59% RETAIL -GALLERY 1,876 2,903 54.76% RETAIL -OTHER 92,220 100,509 8.99% RETAIL -HOME OCCUPATION 215 35 -83.94% Total 346,883 376,620 8.57% 8/15/2014 11:23:14 AM er7Aj72 jcT4/er Page 2 of 2 June YTD Cq'TOWN OF VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW RI TO OF VAIL Sales Tax Newsletter June YTD 2014 Sales Tax June YTD June YTD June YTD 2013 2014 % Collections Collections Change VAIL VILLAGE Retail 1,734,740 1,909,663 10.08% Lodging 2,288,597 2,527,121 10.42% F & B 2,052,247 2,179,481 6.20% Other 79,211 63,822 -19.43% Total 6,154,795 6,680,087 8.53% LIONSHEAD Retail 760,451 816,406 7.36% Lodging 1,520,554 1,712,424 12.62% F & B 586,787 616,906 5.13% Other 33,032 30,876 -6.53% Total 2,900,825 3,176,613 9.51 % CASCADE VILLAGE/EAST VAIL/SANDSTONE/WEST VAIL Retail 993,131 986,221 -0.70% Lodging 771,546 849,784 10.14% F & B 358,346 392,771 9.61 % Other 32,819 33,948 3.44% Total 2,155,842 2,262,723 4.96% OUT OF TOWN Retail 439,275 500,538 13.95% Lodging 132,507 153,590 15.91 % F & B 6,516 7,524 15.46% Utilities & Other 929,664 979,463 5.36% Total 1,507,962 1,641,115 8.83% 8/15/2014 11:24:17 AM 120,1,4; Page 1 of 2 June YTD Cq'TOWN OF VAIL BUSINESS REVIEW RI TO OF HAIL Sales Tax Newsletter June YTD 2014 Sales Tax TOTAL Total 12,719,425 13,760,537 8.19% RETAIL SUMMARY June YTD June YTD June YTD June YTD 2014 2013 2014 % Change Collections Collections Change Retail 3,927,598 4,212,828 7.26% Lodging And Property Mgmt 4,713,204 5,242,918 11.24% Food and Beverage 3,003,896 3,196,681 6.42% Other 1,074,726 1,108,109 3.11 % Total 12,719,425 13,760,537 8.19% RETAIL SUMMARY June YTD June YTD June YTD 2013 2014 % Collections Collections Change RETAIL -FOOD 726,808 RETAIL -LIQUOR 259,645 RETAIL -APPAREL 613,106 RETAIL -SPORT 1,596,722 RETAIL -JEWELRY 103,036 RETAIL -GIFT 39,752 RETAIL -GALLERY 27,930 RETAIL -OTHER 558,632 RETAIL -HOME OCCUPATION 1,967 Total 3,927,598 714,170 -1.74% 277,463 6.86% 660,107 7.67% 1,724,560 8.01 % 107,975 4.79% 27,859 -29.92% 29,107 4.22% 671,318 20.17% 269 -86.34% 4,212,828 7.26% 8/15/2014 11:24:18 AM ,9,x,4;,,, Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM August 27, 2014 To: Vail Town Council Stan Zemler Pam Brandmeyer Judy Camp From: Sally Lorton Re: July Sales Tax I estimate Vail will collect another $70,000 in July sales tax to bring collections to $1,813,290. If so, July will be up 14.2% or $225,962 from budget and up 9.6% or $159,129 from July 2013. Year to date increases 8.4% or $1,206,742 from 2013 and 7% or $1,016,907 from budget. 9/2/2014 Month 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Town of Vail Sales Tax Worksheet 8/27/2014 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Budget 2014 Collections Budget Variance % Change from 2013 % Change from Budget January 1,997,091 2,225,841 2,275,967 2,597,985 2,783,306 2,976,655 2,619,673 2,564,383 2,795,688 2,855,524 3,145,620 3,222,713 3,482,239 259,526 10.70% 8.05% February 2,111,163 2,362,825 2,429,377 2,527,130 2,718,643 3,071,615 2,588,889 2,577,360 2,803,136 2,994,580 3,267,351 3,268,542 3,476,412 207,870 6.40% 6.36% March 2,372,942 2,344,178 2,785,101 2,852,954 2,986,446 3,327,304 2,504,567 2,685,004 3,143,418 3,185,859 3,650,157 3,507,081 3,779,428 272,347 3.54% 7.77% April 871,468 992,157 915,554 1,280,324 1,330,740 1,098,918 1,235,941 1,156,934 1,191,690 1,183,087 1,069,186 1,349,514 1,276,834 (72,680) 19.42% -5.39% May 428,919 411,595 458,770 449,283 545,874 622,103 516,150 421,925 473,292 487,739 563,602 592,713 605,776 13,063 7.48% 2.20% June 742,755 732,113 834,913 805,362 953,017 918,061 717,233 873,765 895,951 963,143 1,023,801 1,035,823 1,146,641 110,818 12.00% 10.70% July 1,075,532 1,128,514 1,166,183 1,255,243 1,265,781 1,397,842 1,121,860 1,228,767 1,481,329 1,573,499 1,654,161 1,587,328 1,743,290 155,962 5.39% 9.83% Total 9,599,870 10,197,223 10,865,865 11,768,281 12,583,807 13,412,498 11,304,313 11,508,138 12,784,504 13,243,431 14,373,878 14,563,713 15,510,620 946,907 7.91% 6.50% August 1,029,446 994,445 993,985 1,055,614 1,162,746 1,349,795 1,068,391 1,147,352 1,310,471 1,380,710 1,507,048 1,457,262 September 679,208 757,033 795,807 832,549 908,318 834,569 753,754 761,425 889,945 978,037 994,135 999,126 October 508,092 532,537 566,173 614,396 688,519 662,767 581,033 594,362 623,420 644,577 755,133 742,761 November 591,269 623,646 713,117 799,582 747,877 719,109 651,873 701,075 788,430 825,873 947,627 878,595 December 2,171,098 2,362,095 2,549,032 2,771,258 2,821,871 2,652,628 2,553,974 2,963,763 3,184,645 2,973,826 3,422,178 3,358,544 Total 14,578,983 15,466,979 16,483,979 17,841,680 18,913,138 19,631,366 16,913,338 17,676,115 19,581,415 20,046,454 21,999,999 22,000,000 9/2/2014 TOWN OF VAIL REVENUE HIGHLIGHTS September 1, 2014 Sales Tax Upon receipt of all sales tax returns, July collections are estimated to be $1,813,290 up 9.6% from last year and up 14.2% compared to the original budget. Year to date collections of $15,580,620 are up 8.4% from the prior year and up 7.0% from the original budget. The annual budget was recently increased to $23.1 million. Inflation as measured by the consumer price index was up 2.0% for July and up 1.7% for the first half of the year. Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) RETT collections through August 27 total $3,849,757 up 41.3% ($1.1 M) from this time last year. The significant increase is mainly due to the purchase of residential properties. So far this year there have been 5 properties sold for over $10 million, 13 properties sold between $5 and $10 million and 23 properties sold between $2.5 and $5 million. These properties account for $2.5 million, or 65% of the total collections year to date. The amended annual RETT budget currently totals $4.9 million. Construction Use Tax Use Tax collections total $1,281,338 year-to-date compared to an amended annual budget of $1.5 million. Construction Use Tax is up 53.7% ($447,421) from collections this time last year. Summary Across all funds, year-to-date total revenue of $49.7 million is up 0.6% from the amended budget and up 14.2% from prior year, mainly due to increases in Sales Tax, Construction Use Tax and RETT collections. 9/2/2014- rnwH of vn' �Ii1 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Matters from the Mayor, Council and Committee Reports. 9/2/2014 rowH Of Mit: VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Executive Session, pursuant to: 1) C.R.S. §24-6-402(4)(b)(e) - to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Regarding: update on pending litigation concerning Staufer Commercial LLC v. Vail Village Inn Plaza Phase 5 Condominiums Case number 2014CV30259; 2) C.R.S. §24- 6-402(4)(a)(b)(e) - to discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of property interests; to receive legal advice on specific legal questions; and to determine positions, develop a strategy and instruct negotiators, Regarding: Negotiations concerning the Timber Ridge Ground Lease Agreement. PRESENTER(S): Matt Mire, Town Attorney 9/2/2014 TOW'S! OF NO VAIL TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO MEETING DATE: September 2, 2014 ITEM/TOPIC: Adjournment (estimated 4:20 p.m.) NOTE: UPCOMING MEETING TOPICS AND ESTIMATED TIMEFRAMES BELOW (ALL ARE APPROXIMATE DATES AND TIMES AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE) -------------------- THE NEXT REGULAR VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING WORK SESSION WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 12:30 P.M. (or TBD), TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 IN THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Ongoing agenda items DRB/PEC updates WS - 15 min.; Information Updates Attachments: WS - 15 min.; Executive Session items: 30 min.; Consent Agenda: 5 min.; Town Manager Report: 5 min. Other agenda items: Discussion of Five Year Capital & RETT Plans - WS - 9/16 VVMC Master Plan Discussion - WS - 9/16 Special VLMD Work Session for 2015 Operating Plan and Budget - 9/16 Lower Bench Ford Park Update - 9/16 GOCO Resolutions - 9/16 Golf Course Update - 9/16 Responses from Town of Vail Picnic Comments - WS - 9/16 (Info Update) Half Day Retreat w/ VLHA - WS - 10/7 Municipal Building Update WS - 10/7 Council's Action Plan Review - WS - 10/21 Discussion on Town Manager's Budget (Final Draft) - WS - 10/21 Quarterly Status Report on Capital Projects & Programs (Info Update) - WS - 10/21 VLMD Meeting and Budget Resolution (consent agenda) - 10/21 First Reading of Ordinance Budget Adoption - ES - 11/4 Discussion on Aspen Report & Follow up - WS - 11/4 Second Reading of Ordinance Budget Adoption - ES - 11/18 Council Action Plan Items: Defining Balanced Community, Follow-up Competitiveness Plan, Parking & Transportation, Technology - TBD Piney Road Site Visit - TBD Lionshead Skate Park Update - TBD Ford Park Parking Reservation System - TBD Meet with Avon Town Council - TBD Investment Policy Update ES - TBD 1-70 Vail Underpass Updates - ES - TBD Clean Up Title 12 Ordinance - TBD Plastic bags - TBD Village Information Center - Greg - TBD Fee Schedule changes - George - TBD Housing Strategic Plan - George - TBD 2015 WAC updates (construction restrictions, legacy program) - WS - TBD Sister City discussion - TBD Streaming PEC & DRB - TBD VLMD Term limits - TBD Walking Mountains zero waste program presentation - TBD 9/2/2014