Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay_5_2014_Minutes Minutes: Art in Public Places Board Meeting Monday, May 5, 2014, 8:30 a.m.,Town Council Chambers AIPP board members present: Julie Hansen, Kathy Langenwalter, Jen Mason, Dana Patterson, Kara Woods AIPP board members absent: Cookie Flaum, Bill Pierce, Wendy St. Charles, Amanda Zinn Others present: Molly Eppard AIPP Coordinator, Margaret Rogers – Town Council Rep 1. Swearing in of new board member Julie Hansen by town clerk Patty McKenny Julie introduces herself to the Board and vice versa. 2. Approval of minutes from April 7th meeting with edit clarifying that Starting Hearts is the organizer of the proposed Rembrandt etching exhibition. 3. No citizen input 4. CIRSA Board Training by Matt Mire, Town of Vail Attorney Matt introduces him as the town attorney. He represents the Board with their purposes of being an appointed town of Vail official to the AIPP Board. There is an errors and omission policy with CIRSA that as long as they are acting in accordance with course and scope of appointed office they are represented. The duties and functions of the Art Board are listed in the ordinance. The rules are different in that the Board acts with a different set of rules as a quasi judicial capacity as there is no legislation. They could affect one person’s property rights in regards to the role of the AIPP Board in developers’ projects. The fundamental rules are one of due process in the public hearings. The Board is prohibited from being lobbied outside of the public meetings. Conflicts of interest involve money. If there is any money that can be made individually or as a company the board member is prohibited from voting, participating, nor influencing the Board in any way. The conflict must be disclosed and the Board member asked to leave the room if necessary. To stay within scope of employment is to stay within the rules and only act with the authority to act. If there is any question ask Matt or Molly. Kathy asks about what constitutes an open meeting. Matt remarks to avoid the allegation that a meeting is occurring outside of the public meeting if three of more members are discussing public art related matters pertaining to the Board. If three or more Board members are together discussing AIPP related matters it is considered to be a public meeting. Meetings via emails should be avoided and unannounced site visits. Kathy asks about time sensitive issues and addressing those via email. Matt and Margaret suggest that the Coordinator should address time sensitive issues with the Chair. Issues that relate to artist selection and awarding contracts should be addressed only in the public meetings. Applications should only be discussed within the public meetings and casual conversations should be avoided. Scheduling via email is fine. Site visits are fine as long as they are included on the public notice as an agenda item. You have the personal benefit exclusion, so if you can benefit financially you are not covered by CIRSA. The Board thanks Matt. 5. Artist presentation – Karl Krueger Karl distributes six copies of materials to the Board and a copy of his portfolio. The packet is a refresher on who he is especially to the new Board members. He introduces himself to the Board and new members. He has his masters in architecture and is a local artist and architect. He was the Triumph Winterfest artist for two years having brought the snow polar bears to Vail. He explains his concepts behind the previously exhibited snow polar bears. He asks the Board to consider him and his concepts in snow sculpting for any possibilities for 2015. He reviews his concepts of the figure of the man and the horse at the last AIPP meeting. He built both horse and man and installed in a meadow in Matterhorn because of the snow that was available. These projects address that he is not concealing the frame in these particular projects. He shows the decay process of the sculpture and how it changed with the weather in the packet of materials. He is asking if AIPP is interested in these projects for Winterfest and how is AIPP coordinating with 2015. He asks if there is an overriding theme to create synergy in the Valley. He compliments Carrie Fell as the official artist selected by the VVF. He also discusses a project involving a bison and incorporating dirt and sod as a summer version of his snow frame concept. It would likely require irrigation to get the soil to grow grass. He is planning to experiment with this idea. Julie asks if he is asking for funding or to be a part of programming. He confirms that he is interested in a commission. He explains that the structures he creates can be reused versus a purely ice sculpture installation. Molly addresses his question about the future in that there are several moving parts. She suggests looking at all opportunities with 2015 and not just the Triumph Winterfest. AIPP has discussed ice projects with Paul Wertin for the coming winter season. Molly suggests that Karl keep the Board informed about any concepts that may fit into the winter schedule. Molly asks if he is interested in the polar bears. He is interested in the bears as the structures are still at his residence. Kathy asks Molly and Jen where the VVF is with 2015. Molly remarks that from the various meetings she has attended that the theme is a modern and contemporary Colorado with the colors of denim, sparkle and the red Levi tag. Molly understands that the old western Colorado is not the direction that they are taking and rather showcasing contemporary Colorado. Jen confirms. She also states that Carrie’s works will be of skiers and not her western themes. Molly comments on the positive feedback regarding the horse snow sculpture though it should have had approval prior to being installed on public land. Molly’s concern is that the horse structure is too reminiscent of a Deborah Butterfield sculpture. Karl explains that the horse and man are generic, but he is more concerned with the life scale and the un-canniness. He is looking for guidance. Molly comments that she liked that he did not pack the snow on the figure as a reveal. He states that the subject matter can be anything. Anything vertical can become the foundation for the sculptures. He reflects on the possibility on sculptures that are not as literal and perhaps reflecting on the history of Colorado. Jen explains that story has been told and that it is the American championships that should be considered. She does believe there is a place for this to be a part of the 2015, perhaps a part of the surprise and delight features. Jen does not think the general public will know of Butterfield’s work, but also likes the skier concept, bison, etc. Karl also is intrigued with creating the bison concept. He does think that there can be an interactive element in the labor involved in packing the snow. Margaret expresses concern that the stick constructions will invite climbing. Kara mentions that the bison could tie nicely into the winter season. Kara mentions that the climbing hazard could also result in a leg slipping through or other injury. Kathy suggests that he figure out costs as he develops his ideas. Kara compliments his polar bears and is enthusiastic to see how his ideas develop. Dana likes the idea that the bison will be growing out of the landscape. The Board is interested to see what he returns with to the Board. 6. Summer programing  Review of Colorado Loops by Yoshitomo Saito for summer temporary placement at International Bridge Colorado Loop #5, 2011, Unique cast bronze, 78"x 73"x 31" Colorado Loop #9, 2013, Unique cast bronze, 74.5"x 86"x 55" The ShipArt estimate for shipping was $4,432 - $5,504.00. Molly has received another estimate for loading and shipping at $2,500 from Art Management Planning. Julie asks to make sure insurance is included. The Board approves shipping costs of $2,500. Dates for display are now June through August. Molly suggests that the Board consider the installation after the Mountain games which would put us at a mid-June installation. The Board prefers extending the display through September/October. He is going to be in an exhibition at Michael Warren Contemporary gallery on Santa Fe through June 14. Molly comments that the planters on the International Bridge have thus far been good places to display art as people are not as inclined to climb on the work. The flower beds also create a boarder to the art work on display. Julie remarks that she likes collections on display for specific periods of time as it will drive people to come and view the work to see what is new. Molly would like to have other events around his works while they are on view in Vail. Molly comments while they are large in scale there is an airiness quality to the works. The Board motions to bring the work for summer display on the International Bridge.  Rembrandt exhibition at Grand View being organized by Starting Hearts. The one week exhibition is scheduled with setup: Wednesday, July 30th-Thursday, July 31st. Exhibit: Friday, Aug 1st-Thursday, Aug 7th. There will be 24 hour security and surveillance of the exhibition.  Molly discusses the community art exhibition at the Vail Public Library and that it will fall at the same time as the Rembrandt show. She is going to discuss the dates of the community show with Lori at the library.  The Vail Public Library has invited paper artist Helen Heibert to have three workshops this summer at the library. The programs will be promoted in the AIPP summer brochure.  Molly met with the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens about possible partnership. Molly suggested a tour of the gardens and perhaps a paper project beneath the canopy with the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens with Helen Heibert. The Board responds positively. Molly reminds the Board of Helen’s exhibition at the Alpine Arts Center.  The public art collection map has been sent to press.  The library would like to do a reception for Charmayne Bernhardt around the work that is on view at the fireplace. Molly reads a thank you letter from Charmayne to the Board. Molly confirms that the work will be on view until July 11.  Julie shares images of a large scale/life size interactive chess set.  Kara asks Molly about QR codes and if that is a possibility for the art collection. Molly comments on an audio mobile app that she is supposed to view with Susie Tjossem.  Kathy suggests that the walk about of the art collection take place at our June 2 meeting. Molly will know more about the agenda closer to the date.  Jen comments that Rider 001 should be fine during the Go Pro games. Molly will look at the dates with the artist and public works for the removal. 8. Site Visit to Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater The Board reconvenes for a tour of the social plaza at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater. The Board meets with Pedro Campos and David Baum from Zehren and Associates and Jack Hunn consultant to the project. Molly states that David would like to show a couple of changes at the site. The Board tours the plaza area and is updated on the progress of Chevo Studio with the Ford Family Tribute. The Board looks at the three pillars on the outside of the tent parameter where the time line will be installed. Molly asks Pedro to confirm which company in Germany is creating the photograph of the Fords in art glass and whether it is Mayer of Munich. The Board then examines the water feature also by Chevo Studio. The Board comments positively on the entire social plaza and the Ford Family Tribute. David shows drawings of a new gate that will be utilized when they need to clear the area of people prior to concerts and other performances. Rather than a manufactured gate, a design was created as collaboration between Pedro Campos, David Baum and Jim Morter. The inspiration was the existing artistic gate at the Alpine Gardens. It will be fabricated of aluminum and tubing materials. This will enable it to be light enough that staff can easily open and close the gates. The finish will be the same green as the masts in the amphitheater. Drawings of the gate are attached to the minutes. The Board motions and approves the artistic gate design as presented by Zehren. The Board walks to the eastern exterior of the amphitheater. The Board confirms that the location of the existing bronze eagle will be fine in the location that is presented to the Board. The eagle though will maintain to be in the VVF’s collection and it is their responsibility. The Board compliments Zehren and the VVF on the enhancements to the amphitheater and remark it will be a great asset to the community. Meeting adjourned.